t^Ujt ETVEggffi YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY THE LIBRARY ASSOCIATES Gift of THOMAS EWART MARSTON YALE 1927 THE ROMANCE OF AN EMPRESS THE Romance of an Empress CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA FROM THE FRENCH OF R. WALISZEWSKI IN TWO VOLUMES Vol. II. LONDON WILLIAM HEINEMANN 1894 [A 11 fights reserved ] CONTENTS PART II— THE EMPRESS ( Continued) BOOK I— THE WOMAN CHAP. PAGE II. IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES, . . i BOOK II— THE SOVEREIGN I. THE ART OF RULING, . . .28 II. HOME POLICY, . . 58 III. FOREIGN POLICY, 104 BOOK III— THE FRIEND OF THE PHILOSOPHERS I. LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES, Il6 II. CATHERINE AS A WRITER, 146 III. CATHERINE AND EDUCATION, 1 57 BOOK IV— INNER ASPECTS I. HOME LIFE, . . • .170 II. FAMILY LIFE — THE GRAND DUKE PAUL, . 204 III. PRIVATE LIFE — FAVOURITISM, . . . . 234 CHAPTER II IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES I With the temperament that we have seen, Catherine could not well be a woman with prin ciples, at least immutable principles, nor with formulated ideas. Her fixed ideas, which she has often had, were so only for the moment ; they were comets, not the guiding stars of her life. One point, however, on which she never varies, is the national character, essentially Russian, that she impresses on her government, and that she seeks to extend to the entire development, politi cal, intellectual, and moral, of the Slavonic people, over whose destinies she, a German princess, has been called to preside. Not only the admi nistrative and legislative acts of her reign, but her slightest sayings and doings bear the trace of this constant preoccupation. Falconet had hard work not to invest Peter I. with the national Russian costume that the Czar was so vol. 11. A CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA emphatic in forbidding throughout his empire. Catherine would have had this trait in the history of the great reformer forgotten. She would have imposed, not merely upon the present, but upon the past, of her adopted country, a whole host of things contrary to the fact, but conformable to the idea that it had pleased her to give her self and others in regard to this land of vast horizons, so tempting to flights of fancy. She would have rewritten in her own way the whole history of the old Muscovite fatherland. In 1790 Senac de Meilhan offered himself as historio grapher of the empire : she hesitated to accept the offer. Would he be willing to lay aside the prejudices ' that most strangers have against Russia ' ? — to the point of believing, for example, ' that before Peter the Great the empire had neither laws nor administration.' Now, ' it is true that the troubles which followed on the death of the Czar Ivan Vassilevitch had put back Russia from forty to fifty years, but before this time it was on the level of the rest of Europe . . . the Grand Dukes of Russia took a prominent part in the affairs of Europe, and were allied and connected with all the sovereign houses of our hemisphere.' After this the poor Senac despaired of be- IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES ing able to cope with his task. But here too Catherine was convinced. She wrote to Grimm : ' No history furnishes better or greater men than ours. I am passionately fond of this history.' She meant, besides, to have a good space given to her own reign, ' for we live in an age in which, far from hiding the lustre of things and actions, it is essential to sustain people's minds.' Would S£nac consent to be ' directed ' in this respect ? Here again we observe a trace of the huge proportions which the vast empire, so strangely become her own property, had little by little attained in the Czarina's mind ; and we see one fixed star the more in her firmament. This hyperbolic idea of grandeur, applied to all the constituent elements of the national inheritance, to the past as to the present of Russia, to its extent as to its population, to its material power as to its moral worth, to its preponderance in the Slavonic world as to its European position, is one of those which never left Catherine, and never lost its hold upon her. She seems dazzled, hallucinated, and as if hypnotised before this collossal conception. High as was the opinion that she had, and that she wished others to have of herself, of the merits of her government, and of the great events which marked it, she did CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA not hesitate to make herself small by comparison : ' All that I can do for Russia is but a drop of water in the sea.' Russia is the sea, the ocean with its unsounded depths, its borders lost to sight in the immensity of space. It is for that that she has been willing to submerge in it her own past, and the very remembrance of her German fatherland. Never theless, it is she who writes, in 1782, complaining to Grimm of the conduct of the Sultan Abdul- Hamid : ' Das ist unmoglich dass ich mir sollte auf die Nase spielen lassen. You know that a German will never suffer that.' But her mind is essentially mobile, and, as she confesses, she does not always know what she wants, or even what she says, especially when she chats with her confidant, pen in hand, in her moments of most complete unbending, after the fatigues of her formidable task. But she has conscientiously applied to herself her Russophilist programme, and she has become Russian from head to foot, not only on the surface and by an artifice, but sincerely and profoundly, in her mind and flesh, in her most formal language, her most familiar motion, her most private thought. The following lines were probably seen by no one till after her death. IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES ' Never has the universe produced a creature more manly, more solid, more frank, more human, more benevolent, more generous, more obliging, than the Scythian (Scythian and Russian are synonymous in her eyes). No man equals him in regularity of features, in beauty of face, in fine ness of complexion, build, and stature ; having for the most part well-nourished, or nervous and muscular, limbs, a thick beard, long and bushy hair ; naturally averse to all ruse and artifice, to which his probity and uprightness are utterly alien. There is not on the earth a horse-soldier or foot-soldier, or sailor, or manager to equal him. No one is tenderer to his children and his kinsmen. He has an inborn deference for his parents and superiors. He is prompt and exact in obedience, always faithful.' This is quite a rhapsody! And no doubt there is something in it of personal recollection, too flatteringly recalled. In course of time, however, something more immaterial, purer and more profound, found its way into the love of Russia that the love of certain Russians gave to Catherine. We must not forget, among the ideas to which she remained faithful, what has been called the great idea of her reign : the Greek project. We CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA shall see that she has had it in view from 1762, and that she still has it in view on the eve of her death. It was a beautiful dream, beautiful and fantastic. The resurrection of Greece, the enfranchisement of the Yougo-Slavs, mingled with other equally dazzling, but less disinterested visions : Constantinople opening its gates to Christianity, represented by a Russian army ; the crescent replaced on the dome of St. Sophia by the double Greek cross, crowned by the two- headed imperial eagle. It is on this account that the second son of Paul is named Constantine, and not Peter or Ivan ; it is on this account that there is a Greek nurse and a Greek servant, who was afterwards to become an important per sonage, Count Kourouta. There was also a corps of Greek cadets, a Greek district-government at Kherson, newly founded, and under the charge of Eugene,a Bulgarian. Medals were struck, on which were seen symbolic and suggestive images : on one side the Empress, on the other Constantinople in flames, a minaret crumbling into the sea, and the cross resplendent in the clouds. The journal of Chrapowicki is not less edifying on the subject. On August 17, 1787, he considers a secret pro ject of Patiomkine for the capture of Bakou and Derbent. Capital for that could be made out of IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES the' troubles in Persia, and, by means of other connections, a province could be formed to be called Albania, which would serve as provisional appointment for the Grand Duke Constantine. On April 21, 1788, Moldavia and Wallachia are discussed : these provinces should remain independent, in order to serve as nucleus to the future ' Dacia,' that is to say, the future monarchy of Greece. On October 9, 1789, the i's are dotted. The Greeks need to be ' stirred up ' : Constantine may take charge of that. He has a future before him. In thirty. years he will have got from Sebastopol to Constantinople. 11 In 1769 the cause of liberty has no more enthusiastic defender in Europe than the Empress of Russia. ' To the brave Corsicans, defenders of liberty and of their country, and, in particular, to General Paoli : Gentlemen ! All Europe has for many years seen you oppose oppression, defend and redeem the country from an unjust usurpation, and fight for liberty. It is the duty of every human creature to aid and support all who mani fest sentiments so noble, so great, and so natural.' CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA The letter is from the hand of Catherine, and is signed ' Your sincere friends, the inhabitants of the North Pole (sic).' A sum of money is added, which passes in the eyes of the brave Corsicans as the result of a subscription. This, doubtless, is in order to spare them the humiliation of being subventioned by an absolute monarch, and also to make them believe that there is, in the neigh bourhood of the ' North Pole,' a respectable number of people capable of sympathising with the cause they defend. In 1 78 1 Catherine comes forward on behalf of Necker. His famous Compte rendu, which is practically an act of accusation against the ad ministration of royal finances, that is to say against royalty itself, enchants and delights her. She does not doubt that heaven has destined the able Genevese for the salvation of France. Certainly she has not much love, just then, either for France or for the turn that things are taking there ; but in her hostile feelings the court holds as large, if not larger, a place than the people, and the old rdgime foundering under the rising flood of social claims has no part in her favour. This is the impression we receive from her correspondence with her son and her daughter- IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES in-law, during the visit of their Imperial High nesses, in 1782, to Paris. Here is a specimen. It is Catherine who writes :• — ' May God bless her most Christian Majesty, her shows, her balls and her plays, her rouge and her beards, well or ill adjusted. I am not sorry that this annoys you and makes you anxious to return. But, how is it that, with its passion for the play, Paris is no better off than we ? I know the reason ; it is because every one leaves the good show for the bad ; that in tragedy they have nothing but what is atrocious ; that plays are written by those who know neither how to make comedies for laughter nor tragedies for tears ; that comedy, instead of bringing laughter, brings tears ; that nothing is in its proper place ; that colours even have only abject and indecent names. All that encourages no sort of talent, but spoils it.' A frivolous and corrupt court, in the midst of a society which its evil example has brought to the verge of a fatal precipice, that is the idea Catherine seems to hold, at this time, in regard to the country of her ' dear master,' who himself has given colour to her opinions, in denying at every opportunity his kinship with the pitiable 'Vandals.' Her dominant idea, however, is a feeling of in- CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA difference in regard to men and things there. For a long time, up to the very verge of the revolutionary crisis, the events and agitations, in this far country, seem to her without any general importance ; she does not perceive their bearing. Nor, whatever may have been said to the con trary, does she see the approach of the tempest. On April 19, 1788, she writes to Grimm : ' I do not share the belief of those who imagine that we are on the eve of a great revolution.' Hearing, in the course of her tour through the Crimea, of the resolution of Louis XVI. to convoke an 'Assembly of Notables,' she sees in it only an imitation of her own legislative commission. She invites Lafayette to visit her at Kief. To open her eyes on what is being prepared by the Lafayettes, it needs the thunderclap of the taking of the Bastille. Then she begins to under stand what is in the air, and the Gazette de St.- Pe,tersdourg,wh.ich had been silent on the Assembly of the States and the Tennis-court Oath, breaks out in indignant protestations : ' Our hand shakes with horror,' etc. The rest of the article may be imagined. Soon the constituents are com pared by the officious journal to ' a drunken mob,' as their successors are to be compared to ' cannibals.' IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES n From this moment Catherine's ideas underwent a rapid change, and it is curious to follow, in her correspondence and her confidential conversation, the progress of this evolution. In June 1790 Grimm, who has not yet had time to perceive the change which is coming over the Empress's mind, asks for her portrait on behalf of Bailly, offering in exchange that of the revolutionary hero of the day. Catherine replies — ' Listen : I cannot accede to your request, and it is as little suitable for the mayor who has dis- monarchised France to have the portrait of the most aristocratic Empress in Europe, as it would be for her to send it to the dismonarchising mayor ; it would be to place both the dis monarchising mayor and the aristocratissime Empress in contradiction with themselves and their functions, past, present, and future.' And two days after — ' I repeat that you are not to give to the dis monarchising mayor the portrait of the greatest aristocrat in Europe ; I would have nothing to do with Jean Marcel, who will be strung up a la lanterne some day soon.' Here is a complete . throwing overboard of republicanism. It is not so with regard to philo sophy, to which the Empress still clings. She CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA endeavours to find out how far it is responsible for the present events — TO GRIMM. ' Jtme 25, I79°- 'The National Assembly should burn all the best French authors, and all that has carried their language over Europe, for all that declares against the abominable mess that they have made. ... As for the people and its opinion, that is of no great consequence ! ' It is this last phrase especially which shows the antagonism, now only capable of increase, be tween the spirit of Catherine and of the Revolu tion. It is the part, more and more prominent, played by the people in the events of which Paris has become the theatre that shocks and offends the sovereign. There was a time when, in this respect also, she had other ideas. At the outset of her reign, in gathering together her legislative commission, she did nothing less, in reality, than summon it from the mass of her subjects. But it is then, too, that, coming for the first time in contact with the popular element, she began little by little to change her mind in regard to it. Perhaps she was unwise in generalising from her impressions, but she had no other points of comparison. She could but form her opinion on what was before her eyes, and this opinion IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES 13 became a profound contempt. In 1787, as her secretary, Chrapowicki, points out to her the enor mous number, of peasants who crowd to see her and pay homage to her in a certain country town, she replies with a shrug of the shoulders : ' They would come just the same to see a bear.' It is the same spirit to which she gives utterance two years after, when, referring to the composition of the political clubs in France, she says : ' How can shoemakers have anything to do with affairs ? A shoemaker only knows how to make shoes.' Soon philosophy in turn is abandoned. Cathe rine still speaks with respect of ' good French authors,' but she makes her choice, and, Voltaire excepted, she throws overboard all those of the eighteenth century. Diderot, d'Alembert, and Montesquieu himself, are sacrificed at one blow — TO GRIMM. ' Sept. 12, 1790. ' I must tell you the truth, the tone with you now is that of mere intemperance ; this is not the tone to make France illustrious. . . . What will the French do with their best writers, who almost all lived under Louis XIV. ? All — Voltaire himself — are royalists ; they preach order and tranquillity, and all that is opposed to the system of this hydra with twelve hundred heads.' The National Assembly is referred to more and 14 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA more bitterly. On August 7th, 1 790, Chrapowicki notes in his journal : ' Said in presence of her Majesty, speaking of France : " It is a meta physical country ; every member of the assembly is a king, and every citizen is an animal." Re ceived with approbation.' At the same time Catherine writes to Grimm — 'Sept. 27, 1790. ' In bed I reflected over things, and, among others, I thought that one reason why the Mathieu de Mont- morencys, the NoaiUes, etc., are so ill-taught and so base in spirit that they are among the first promoters of the decree abolishing the nobility ... is that the schools of the Jesuits have been abolished among you : whatever you may say, those scamps looked well after the morals and tastes of the young people, and what ever is best in France came out of their schools.' 'Jan. 13, 1791. ' One never knows if you are living in the midst of the murders, carnage, and uproar of the den of thieves who have seized upon the government of France, and who will soon turn it into Gaul as it was in the time of Caesar. But Caesar put them down ! When will this Caesar come ? Oh, come he will, you need not doubt' ' May 21, 1791. ' The best of possible constitutions is worth nothmg when it makes more people unhappy than happy, when brave and honest folk have to drudge, and only the rogues are in clover, because their pockets are filled, and nobody punishes them.' IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES 15 Observe, however, with what moderation Catherine is still capable, at this period, of dis cussing one of the revolutionary principles most repugnant to her. Her letter of June 30th, 1791, to the Prince de Ligne may be given in evi dence — ' I think that the Academies ought to offer a first prize for the question : What do honour and worth, synonyms dear to heroic ears, become in the mind of an active citizen under a jealous and suspicious government, which proscribes all distinction, while nature itself has given to the intelligent man a pre-eminence over the fool, and courage is founded on the sentiment of the force of the body or of the head ? Second prize for the question : Are honour and worth really needful ? And if so, surely one should not restrain the desire of emulation, and clog it with an insup portable enemy, equality.' But soon she is carried away by more violent feelings — 'Sept. I, 1791. ' If the French Revolution takes in Europe, there will come another Gengis or Tamerlane to restore it to reason : that is what I prophesy, and be sure it will come true, but it will not be in my time, nor, I hope, in that of M. Alexandre.' 1 6 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA When the news of the death of Louis XVI. reaches her, Catherine, as we have mentioned, is cut to the heart ; she betakes herself to bed, in a sort of fever, and she cries to her confidant — 'Feb. I, 1793. ' The very name of France should be exterminated ! Equality is a monster. It would fain be king!' This time the holocaust is complete. Voltaire is sacrificed with the rest. And in the words and writing of the Empress there are almost savage calls to vengeance, the most extravagant projects of repression — 'Feb. 15, 1794. ' I propose that all the Protestant powers should embrace the Greek religion, to save themselves from the irreligious, immoral, anarchical, abominable, and diabolical plague, enemy of God and of thrones ; it is the sole apostolic and truly Christian religion — an oak with wide-spreading roots.' Thus, after Caesar, she calls for Tamerlane and his exterminating sword ; after the Jesuits, a long-bearded pope, who will bring the lost peoples into the safeUold of the Orthodox Church. Is the Caesar for whom she calls, he whom France and Europe have indeed felt? Yes and no. This Caesar she did not at first perceive. In IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES 17 1 791 she is evidently dreaming of some officer of justice coming from without — some Brunswick. It is only later on that her point of view changes, becomes clearer, and then, it must be admitted, she comes very near the truth — touches it almost. Catherine sees Napoleon before he has ap peared ; she points to him, describes his charac teristics — ' If France is to come out of this alive,' she writes, February 11, 1794, 'she will be more vigorous than ever ; she will be meek and obedient as a lamb ; but it will need a man both great and bold, a man above his contemporaries, and perhaps above the age. Is he born ? Is he not ? Will he come ? All depends on that. If he is found, he will arrest the last downfall, and that will be arrested whenever he is found, in France or elsewhere.' The men of the Revolution who preceded Napoleon all shared in the indignation of the Empress, and in the severity of her judgments. Lafayette is now called 'the big booby.' Mira beau is at first better treated. The praises showered on his tardy loyalism in the Gazette de St. Pdtersbourg show that the relations of the tribune with the Russian Legation at Paris were not unknown, nor yet the services that were vol. 11. B 1 8 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA looked for from him. But, after his death, Catherine's personal opinion is emphatically ex pressed in her letters to Grimm — ' Mirabeau was the colossus or monster of our time ; in any other he would have been avoided, detected, imprisoned, hanged, or broken on the wheel.' And three days afterwards — ' I do not like the honours paid to Mirabeau, and I do not understand the why or wherefore, unless it be to encourage wickedness and all the vices. Mirabeau merits the esteem of Sodom and Gomorrha.' She retracts, too, her admiration for Necker — ' I agree with the views of M. F. on Malet du Pan and on that bad and foolish Necker : to me they are not merely hateful, but mere bores and chatterboxes.' She is not more tender towards the Duke of Orleans — ' I hope that no Bourbon will ever again bear the name of Orleans, after the horror that I feel towards the last who bore it.' As for the Abbe Sieges, she settles his account at once : ' I subscribe to the hanging of the Abbe Sieges.' It is but just to say that the Revolutionaries ; IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES 19 give her back her own. Volney returns the gold medal which the Empress has formerly bestowed on him. Sylvain Marechal, in his Jugement Dernier des Rois, depicts the Empress in gro tesque hand-to-hand conflict with the Pope, who throws his tiara at her head, after which she is swallowed up with all her accomplices by a volcano that opens under her feet. The Moni teur is not always amiable towards her. Nevertheless, it must be noted that, for a long time, Catherine, while severely condemning the revolutionary movement, does not, in Russia or elsewhere, set on foot against it any act of direct repression. She remains a passive, and in some sort disinterested, spectator of passing events. Her whole attitude seems to say that all these things have no concern for her ; that, whatever may happen, she has nothing to fear for herself or for the empire. At bottom, she is probably convinced of it to the last. Only it happens that the combinations, or we might better say the improvisations, of her policy come to impose upon her convictions. The precise epoch when she decides to abandon her inaction sufficiently indicates her reasons for doing so : it is the moment when, having settled affairs with Turkey and Sweden, she judges the hour come to inter- CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA fere in Poland, and to put her hand to the master-work of her reign. The French Revolu tion then appears in her eyes as one of those propitious ' conjunctions ' which, with conjectures and circumstances, make up, for her, the whole of politics. A dialogue with her secretary Chrapowicki, December 14, 1791, gives clear utterance to her view in this respect — ' I am doing all I can to get the courts of Berlin and Vienna to concern themselves with French affairs.' ' They are not very active.' ' No. The court of Berlin goes forward, but that of Vienna remains behind. They do not see my point. Am I wrong ? There are reasons that one cannot say openly. I wish them to become concerned in the French affairs in order to leave me elbow-room. I have many undertakings to be achieved. I would have them occupied so that they may leave my way clear. ' And immediately Catherine sets the tocsin ringing. Up to the present she has been content to publish in Paris, through her minister Simo- line (in August 1790) a ukase commanding all her subjects to quit France, in order that more of them should not think to imitate the example IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES of the young Count Alexander Strogonof, who, with his tutor, had joined a revolutionary club. But it had not occurred to her to interdict in her empire the incendiary publications coming from the banks of the Seine. Russia remained the sole country in Europe open to the circulation of the papers printed at Paris. One number of the Moni teur had been confiscated, because it enlarged somewhat too explicitly on the score of the Grand Duke and different personages of the court. From that day Catherine examined every number before authorising the distribution. She soon came across one where she herself, in her turn, was very hardly treated : she was described as 'the Messalina of the North.' 'That concerns no one but myself,' she said proudly, and ordered its distribution. She tolerated the presence in St. Petersburg of the brother of Marat, who, while condemning the sanguinary furies of the other, did not conceal his republican views. Tutor in the house of Count Saltykof, he often comes to court with his pupil. It is only in 1792 that he changes his name, and takes that of Boudri. Then, in truth, all around him changes : the Empress embarks in the anti-revolutionary campaign, at first without much enthusiasm, purely as a political manoeuvre, but more and CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA more sincerely, and more and more passionately too, entering little by little into the part she has wished to play, and adopting as her own those ideas, sentiments, and instincts. Not content with attacking the revolutionary spirit in France and among the French, she pursues it in Russia, among the Russians themselves, which is really doing it more honour than it deserves. In regard to France she draws up, in 1792, a memorandum on the means of restoring the monarchy. It must be said that she does not manifest much common-sense in the project. She imagines that a force of ten thousand men, marching from end to end of the country, would suffice to the task. The cost would only be ,£500,000, which could be borrowed at Genoa. France, once handed back to its king, would return the amount. In regard to the Frenchmen imbued with the revolutionary spirit, who might be found in her dominions, she concocts the famous ukase of February 3, 1793, which constrains them, under threat of immediate expulsion, to take an oath, of which the terms could not have been better imagined by a tribunal of inquisitors. Nor does she treat her subjects with more in dulgence. To ward them off from the contagion of Jacobinism, she has recourse to means which IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES 23 she could not have sufficiently scorned at the commencement of her reign. Learning the choice that had been made of Prozorofski for the post of Governor of Moscow, Patiomkine writes to his imperial friend — ' You have taken out of your arsenal the most ancient piece of artillery, which will certainly shoot in the direction in which you set it, for it has no motion of its own ; but beware lest it covers with blood for ever the name of your Majesty.' Prozorofski and his collaborators of Moscow and St. Petersburg, Arharof, Chechkofski, and Pestel, seemed, in the vigorous phrase of a Russian writer, 'to have risen into the light of day out of the torture-chambers of the Preo- brajenski Prikaz, already lost in the night of oblivion.' The trial of the Muscovite publicist, Novikof, condemned to fifteen years' imprison ment for carrying on certain publications to which the Empress herself had formerly con tributed, inaugurates a rigime which justifies only too well the apprehensions of Patiom kine. Catherine bears a grudge even against the high French cravats, covering the chin, which the dandies of St. Petersburg, Prince Borys Galitzine at their head, persist in wearing. 24 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA We have endeavoured to present the notions inspired in Catherine by the great political and social upheaval of the end of the eighteenth century. These notions, it is evident, were narrow. Catherine could not see that, under all its deplorable errors, its culpable mistakes, the movement that she sought to repress contained something noble, lofty, and generous. Perhaps mere intelligence could not suffice for the com prehension of these things. What was wanted was a certain personal elevation of sentiment, which Catherine never possessed. In trying to fight with the Revolution, she seized her chance of stifling the last vestiges of national independence on the banks of the Vistula : that was a matter of policy, and we may waive our judgment respecting it. But, the fight once at end in Poland, she was neither touched as a woman, nor impressed as a sovereign, by what made the glory of the expiring republic and its rehabilitation before posterity, by the last resist ance of the vanquished, by the hero who personi fied all its useless effort and its tragic destiny. Having, summoned to St. Petersburg as a com mon malefactor the vanquished soldier whom Michelet named ' the last Knight of the West and the first Citizen of the East,' whom Napoleon IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES 25 afterwards, at the height of his power, would have called to his aid, and who, in his Swiss shelter, was not to be dazzled by Napoleon, Catherine was not even curious to see him. She was content to abuse him. ' Kostiouchko ' — she did not even know how to spell his name — ' has been brought here ; he is seen to be in every way a mere fool, quite beneath contempt. That is how she judges the man. ' Ma pauvre bete de Kostiouchka,' we read in another letter. That is all the pity she can spare to the soldier who had fallen on the field of Macieiowice, the soldier in whose wounds the very soul of a great and noble people seemed to pass in one last cry of agony. Paul I., on reaching the throne, is said to have visited the ex-dictator in his prison, and, bending low before him, desired his pardon for his mother. Perhaps it is only a legend, and if so, so much the worse for the son of Catherine. At all events he set the prisoner free. Catherine had never thought of doing it. We once heard a German, who to-day occupies a high position at Vienna, declare that, being cosmopolitan in his tastes, he liked every nation ality equally, except one, and that his own ; for, said he, along with many good qualities, it had 26 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA one defect which he disliked above all others, it did not know how to be generous. In one sense, and from this point of view, just or not, Catherine remained German. She knew how to give, sometimes even how to pardon, but she was utterly inaccessible to certain sentiments that awaken naturally in all true hearts at the sight of weakness, suffering, and misfortune. Her ideas, as we know them, did not allow her to appreciate a certain type of simple grandeur. Her own simplicity was all made of show and convention. She was always playing a part when she showed herself under this aspect. She was willing to come down from Olympus, and she even took pleasure in it, but Olympus and all its train must be not far off. This is why, in 1782, she refused the honour of receiving Franklin. ' I do not care for him,' she said. She did not understand him. In 1795 she did not understand Kosciuszko. Is it true that she ever echoed the one among all the kings her contemporaries whom she pro fessed the most to scorn, Louis XV., by repeating in her way the famous saying 'After me the deluge ' ? ' Poslie mienia hot trava nie rosti (After me the grass may cease to grow) ' she is said to have said at the end of her life. It IDEAS AND PRINCIPLES may well be. But to arrive at that point, she had need to abjure all that made the true glory of her reign, all to which she owes to day that immortality of which she had the sublime thirst. BOOK II THE SOVEREIGN CHAPTER I THE ART OF RULING I ' I love the fallow land,' wrote Catherine. ' I have said it a thousand times, I am good for nothing out of Russia.' She thus proved the extreme lucidity of mind which permitted her, at least occasionally, to achieve this tour de force — a just appreciation of her own merits. Prince Henry of Prussia, sent to St. Petersburg, as an act of gratitude, by his brother, and there study ing the sovereign with a German's resolution to get to the bottom of things, said one day to the Comte de Segur — ' She (Catherine) is made to shine, she is immortalised during her lifetime ; otherwise, she would no doubt shine much less ; but in her THE ART OF RULING country she is more intelligent than all those about her. It is easy to be great on such a throne.' Catherine did not fail to recognise one of the elements, and perhaps the most essential, of all her successes — luck. ' I have had nothing but good luck,' she said frankly enough. How indeed could she fail to see in the path of her life this indispensable factor of all prosperity ? In 1770 she copied with her own hand a note from her improvised admiral, the commandant-in- chief of her naval forces in the Levant, Alexis Orlof, who, though he had never till then seen a ship or a sailor, knew enough at the end of a week to see that those with whom he had been told to conquer 'were not worth a pinch of salt.' ' My hair stands on end as I think of these things,' wrote Orlof. ' If we had to do with any but Turks, there would soon be an end of the fleet.' It is this fleet and its admiral that won the victory of Tchesme, shattering to atoms one of the finest fleets that Turkey had ever sent to sea. And in 1781 Catherine had already sent to Grimm the following rdsumd of the history of her reign, set forth by her new secretary and factotum, Besborodko, in the fantastic form of an inventory : — 3° CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Governments instituted according to the new form, 29 Towns built, ....... 144 Treaties made, ....... 30 Victories won, ....... 78 Notable edicts, decreeing laws, 88 Edicts on behalf of the people, 123 Total, 402 Four hundred and ninety-two active measures ! This astonishing piece of book-keeping, which betrays so naively all that there was of romantic, extravagant, childish, and very feminine, in the extraordinary genius that swayed Russia, and in some sort Europe, during thirty-four years, will no doubt make the reader smile. It corre sponds, however, truly enough, to a sum-total of great things accomplished under her direct inspiration. And all that, was it not really due to her good luck? No indeed! Prince Henry of Prussia is too severe, Catherine too modest, and we have proved it already in speaking of the character of the great sovereign. With such a character one generally puts something more than chance and success in the balance of human destinies, over which one is called to preside. Catherine put there, to begin with, remarkable qualities of THE ART OF RULING 31 tenue. On July 3, 1764, the envoy of Frederick, Comte de Solms, wrote to his master — ' On the part of the nation discontent and commotion, and much courage and firmness, at least in appearance, on the part of the Empress. She left here (Livonia) with an air of the greatest serenity and the most composed countenance, though, only two days before, there had been a mutiny in the army.' In another circumstance, the Prince de Ligne has noted — ' I was the only one to see that the last declara tion on part of Turkey gave her only a quarter of an hour's reflection on the instability of human things, and the uncertainty of success and glory. She left the room with the same air of serenity that she had before her courier had gone.' Imposing on all the world, her friends as well as her enemies, by this attitude, Catherine can never be imposed upon by man or thing, and is never put out of countenance. In 1788, at the moment when the Swedish war broke out, there was a terrible lack of men, both in the army and in the government, but especially in the army. The Count of Anhalt presents himself, backed by his European reputation as a soldier, and offers his services. He is received with open arms. 32 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA But he demands the rank of general-in-chief, and the supreme command. Catherine refuses. The German condottiere, surprised and indignant, de clares that he will go and plant cabbages. ' Look after them well,' replies the Empress calmly. To increase the prestige that she already has, she does not disdain, from time to time, to have recourse to certain artifices, to certain effects of pose and arrangement. The Comte de Segur, on presenting his credentials, perceives 'some thing theatrical ' in the behaviour of the Empress ; but this ' something ' has such an effect upon the new-comer that he forgets the formal speech he has prepared beforehand, and is obliged to improvise another. One of his predecessors, yet more overcome, was unable, if we may believe Catherine, to get beyond the words, ' The King my master,' which he repeated three times in succession. At the third repetition Catherine put an end to his misery by saying that she well knew the good-will of his master towards her. But she looked upon him, from that moment, as a fool, though he had the reputation in Paris of being a man of ready wit. She was indulgent only to her servants. It should be said that she had the right to be exigent in regard to those who had to speak THE ART OF RULING 33 before her, for, as the Prince de Lipme has observed, she had 'the art of listening.' 'Such was her presence of mind,' he tells us, 'that she seemed to be listening, even when she was thinking of something else.' The Prince de Ligne adds that nevertheless his own Empress, Maria Theresa, had 'more charm and magic,' Catherine manifests more authority. And she is careful to keep this side of her sovereign prestige intact. One day, at an official dinner, having to express some discontent with the envoy of a foreign power, she makes one of those scenes of which Napoleon, later on, was so fond. In the midst of her tirade she hears her secre tary, Chrapowicki, observing in an undertone how much it is to be regretted that the ma- touchka loses her temper in this way. She stops short, changes the conversation, behaves most amiably to the end of dinner ; but on rising from table she goes straight to the in terrupter : ' How dare you criticise in public what I say ! ' Her voice trembles with wrath, and the cup of coffee that she holds in her hand is in danger of falling to the ground. She puts down the cup without emptying it, and dismisses the unfortunate secretary. He thinks himself lost, and goes home expecting, at the very least, vol. 11. c 34 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA an order to set out for Siberia. A messenger comes to summon him before her Majesty. Catherine is still much excited, and overwhelms him with reproaches. He falls on his knees. ' Come,' says the Empress, presenting him with a snuff-box set with diamonds, ' keep this, and when you have any observations to make in public on what I say or do, hold your tongue and take a pinch of snuff. The reminder may be of use to me.' With such command over herself, it is certain that she must exercise great command over others. It is indeed enormous, and all the traits of her character, of her temperament, and of her mind, serve to strengthen it. Her attitude impresses and fascinates, her energy, her fire, her youthful 'go,' her confidence, her audacity, her verve, her way of presenting things to others as they present themselves to her, that is to say, on the brightest side, her scorn of danger and difficulty, made up of a good half of ignorance and a good third of adventurous infatuation, her day-dreams, that sort of gorgeous hallucination in which she lives, and through which the sense of real things comes to her ; all that aids her in driving forward good and bad, wise and foolish alike, driving them forward as a horseman does his horse, now carressed and now flogged, THE ART OF RULING 35 spurred, shaken, and in some sort borne along by the effort of a will which increases tenfold the play of the muscles. Read the correspondence of the sovereign with her generals in the first Turkish war, Galitzine and Roumiantsof. Galit- zine is utterly incompetent, Roumiantsof is an accomplished soldier : she scarcely notices the difference. They must both march ; they must both beat the Turks ; it is impossible that they should not do that. The Turks, what are they ? A herd, not an army. And then, 'Europe is ob serving us.' One seems to hear Napoleon be side the Pyramids. She thanks Roumiantsof for a Turkish poignard that he has sent her, but the capture of two ' hospodars ' would please her better. Nor is that enough : ' I beg you to be good enough to send me the Vizier himself, and, if God wills, his Highness the Sultan himself.' She will do all to render the victory easy : ' She is setting fire to the Turkish empire at all four corners.' She sends word to her Minister of War, so that he may hold himself in readiness : ' Monsieur, monsieur, I want plenty of cannons. . . . What am I to do if the cannons are dear ? ' One would take her for a fine lady ordering a further supply of dresses from a good maker. She adds : ' I have now an army at Cuban, an 36 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA army acting against the Turks, an army against the brainless Poles ; I am about to collar the Swedes, and I have three more soumatohi (brawls) in petto, that I dare not avow. Send me, if you can without attracting notice, a map of the Mediterranean and the Archipelago, and then pray God : God will arrange all.' But now, in September 1 771, one of the lieu tenants of Roumiantsof, General Essen, is de feated under the walls of Giourgi. It is nothing. ' Where there has been water, there is water still,' says the Russian proverb. The Russian proverb is right. ' God favours us, but some times he punishes us in order that we may not become too proud.' We must go ahead, and all will be well. Roumiantsof goes ahead, he leaves the right bank of the Danube. Victory! cries Catherine. Quick, a pen, to send the good news to Voltaire, that the good news may spread through all Europe ! Alas ! in obeying his sove reign, Roumiantsof has attempted too much. He is obliged to beat a retreat. He excuses himself on account of the state of the army. He ima gines that he has enemies about the Empress who have purposely left him without enough food and ammunition. ' He does not know what he is saying ! ' Catherine has never heard that he had THE ART OF RULING 37 enemies capable of doing him a mischief with her. That would be impossible. 'She has no people about her to whisper in her ear. . . . She will have none of such folk. . . . She judges those capable of doing well by what they do.' No doubt Roumiantsof s army is weak. Especially (a little cut in passing) as it must have suffered in the marches and counter-marches from one bank of the Danube to the other. But the Empress cannot forget the inscription en graved on the obelisk commemorating the vic tory won by Roumiantsof at Kagoul : it declares that he had only 17,000 men under his command. With his skill and energy he can renew this feat of arms ; provided always that he does not allow himself to be discouraged. Forward ! Forward ! 11 This correspondence discovers yet another superiority in Catherine : her skill in the manage ment of men. In that she is simply marvellous. She employs all the resources of a trained diplo matist, of a subtle psychologist, and of a woman who knows the art of fascination ; she employs them together or apart, she handles them with unequalled mae stria. If it is true that she some- 38 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA times takes her lovers for generals and statesmen, it is no less true that she treats on occasion her generals and statesmen as lovers. When the sovereign can do nothing, the Circe intervenes. If it avails nothing to command, to threaten, or to punish, she becomes coaxing and wheedling. To wards the soldiers that she sends to death, bidding them only win for her victory, she has delicate attentions, flattering forethought, adorable little ways. After the battle of Kinburn (October 1787), having to send quantities of ribbon to the heroes of the day, she arranges them with her own hands, in a basket of flowers, which she sends to Patiomkine. In September 1789 she sends to Prince von Nassau-Siegen, the hew commander of the fleet, two warm dressing-gowns, ' like those I sent last year to Marshal Prince Patiomkine before Otchakof, and which were of great service to him, as he himself assured me.' She flatters the literary ambitions of the' Comte de Segur in absolutely insisting on putting his Coriolanus on the stage, and, in the course of the performance, she seizes both his hands to make him applaud himself. She even gives out that she knows the piece by heart, reciting aloud a dozen lines, where, it is true, she has caught a political allusion that she wishes to emphasise. THE ART OF RULING 39 Should fortune smile upon the efforts she has thus provoked and stimulated, she is profusely grateful : honours, pensions, gifts of money, of peasants, of land, rain upon the artisans of her glory. But she does not abandon those who have had the misfortune to be unlucky. In June 1790 Prince von Nassau-Siegen is ingloriously defeated. She immediately writes to him — ' I hope you know me well enough to be sure that the gossip of the town, which has apparently reached you, will have no effect upon me. I know perfectly your zeal ; I do it justice ; I most sin cerely share your mortification ; I am distressed to hear that it has even affected your health. . . . Mon Dieu, who is there, then, that has not had great reverses in his life ? Have not the greatest captains had their unlucky days. The late King of Prussia was really only great after a great reverse. . . . Remember, Prince, your successes in the South and North, rise above these untoward events, and go forward against the enemy, instead of asking me to appoint another commander for the fleet. I cannot do so now without giving occasion to your enemies. I lay too great store by the services you have rendered me not to support you, especially at a time when you are suffering, as you tell me, in body and mind.' 4o CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA She supports him, in fact, against all. As, in his endeavour to retire from the position, he appeals to the unfavourable state of affairs, she replies that it will be cruel of him towards her if he cannot remedy them. ' I have always liked to take an interest in the affairs of those who looked after mine.' And, as the clamour of court and town still continue against the defeated general, she writes to him again — ' You acted upon a plan approved by me and upon my orders, and, coming from the supreme authority, they could not have been submitted to any further opinion, since, as long as I live, I shall never allow what I have ordered and approved of in regard to service to be called in question by a living soul ; nor does any one here attempt to do so. You are right, and you must be right, since I say that you are right. That is an " aristocratic " reason, no doubt ; but it can be no otherwise without turning every thing upside down.' And it is always thus. In 1794 General Igelstrom, having been surprised at Warsaw by a popular outbreak, is suspended from office ; but, one day, as those about the Empress are intent upon running him down, she raises her voice : ' Silence, gentlemen ; do not forget that he served THE ART OF RULING 41 me for thirty years, and that I owe to him the peace with Sweden.' A fragment of conversation with Count Nicolas Roumiantsof, the son of the hero of the first Turkish war, which is reported to us by Gretch, shows, on the other hand, the multiplicity of means which she has at her command, and which she uses to obtain the aid of those whose devotion is likely to be useful to her. She asks the Count if he thinks it easy to govern men. ' I think there is nothing more difficult,' replies Roumiantsof. ' Come now, you have only to observe three principles : the first is to act so that people fancy they are doing of their own accord what you make them do.' 'That is quite enough,' interrupts Roumiantsof. Admiral Tchitchagof relates that his brother, who was gentleman of the bedchamber, had one day the misfortune to be late in arriving. The Empress observed it, and did not fail to com ment on this negligence, but it was in the form of eulogies heaped on the father of Tchitchagof, who, for fifty years, never once failed to be at his post. Those who were present imagined that the young man was receiving the most extraordinary signs of imperial favour, until he confessed to them afterwards that he had never been so miserable and confused. ' I make it a point to 42 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA praise aloud, and to complain quietly,' said Catherine. And is it not easy to imagine the effect that a word from her lips, a gesture of her hand, the slightest mark of satisfaction or of dissatisfaction, coming from her, would have over the simple and impressionable people with whom she was for the most part brought in contact ? Tchitchagof relates that a General Vorontsof, Commandant of the Post of Revel, whom he had known well, was struck by an attack of apoplexy, of which he died, at the mere idea of having incurred the sovereign's displeasure. A non-commissioned officer named Stepan Chirai, sent to the Empress by Souvarof with the news of the taking of a fortress, returned with the Cross of St. Vladimir of the fourth class, which the Empress herself had pinned on his chest. Thirty years later the Emperor Nicholas, on the day of his coronation, thought to advance him a class. He returned the new cross: he could not make up his mind to give up the one that he had received from the hands of the matouchka ! in Catherine's art of ruling was not, however, without its shortcomings, some of which were THE ART OF RULING 43 due to the mere fact of her sex, whose depen dences and weaknesses she was powerless to overcome. ' Ah ! ' she cried one day, ' if heaven had only granted me breeches instead of petti coats, I could do anything. It is with eyes and arms that one rules, and a woman has only ears.' The petticoats were not solely responsible for her difficulties. We have already referred to a defect which bore heavily upon the conduct of affairs during her reign : this great leader of men, who knew so well how to make use of them, did not know how to choose them. Her judgment, usually so accurate and penetrating, her lucidity, great as it was, deserted her on this point. She could not see in others either the qualities or the defects that she discovered and analysed in herself with so extraordinary a clearness of sight. There was here a gap in her intelligence, due probably, in part at least, to the influence of her tempera ment. It seems that her vision of men in general - was disturbed, in this respect, by the breath of ^passion which influenced all her life. The general, the statesman, of whom she had need, she seemed to see only through the male whom she liked or disliked. What she looked for first, in the face of any functionary whatever, was the romantic side, the more or less attractive exterior. That she took 44 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Patiomkine for an able man may be excused ; he was perhaps a madman, but he had the madness of genius. He belonged to the category of men who are called forces of nature. And this force, let loose upon immensity in this ' fallow land ' for which Catherine felt that she had been born, had its value. But after Patiomkine came Zoubof. He was a mere puppet : Catherine took him for a man of genius. The contrary also happened to her. Rou miantsof having presented before her one of his lieutenants, General Weissmann, whom he judged capable of taking his place in case of need, Catherine conversed with him on three occasions, and, having turned him this way and that, ' came to the conclusion that he was an absolute fool.' The wretched man shortly afterwards rushed upon his death in the battle of Koutchouk- Kajnardji. In the opinion of all competent to judge, he was beyond compare as a soldier, and valiant among the valiant. One historian has called him ' the Achilles of the Russian army.' These mistakes of judgment were frequent. But Catherine did more than this, and worse. With the obstinacy which characterised her, and the infatuation that her successes gave her, she came little by little to translate this capital defect THE ART OF RULING 45 into a parti pris, to formulate it as a system ; one man was worth another, in her eyes, so long as he was docile and prompt to obey. She had in this respect maxims which might well disconcert her admirers. ' Tell me,' she wrote to Grimm, ' if ever sovereign has more absolutely chosen his min isters according to the voice of public opinion than Louis XVI. ? And we have seen what happened. According to me, no country has a dearth of men. Don't try to look all round about you, try to use what you have at hand. It is always said of us that we have a dearth of men ; yet in spite of all, things come right. Peter I. had the same, and knew not how to read or write ; well, did not things succeed ? Ergo, there is no such thing as a dearth of men ; there is a multi tude, but you must make them move : all will go well if you have this other to make them move. What does your coachman do, souffre-douleur, when you are boxed up in your coach ? A good heart goes everywhere ; ' because this or that is narrow and limited, the master is not.' And again : ' Assuredly men of worth are never lacking, for it is affairs which make men and men which make affairs ; I have never tried to look for them, and I have always found close 46 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA at hand the men who have served me, and I have for the most part been well served.' This does not hinder her from one day making this reflection, which she puts in a letter to the Prince de Ligne — ' Ah, Prince, who knows better than I do that there are clerks who are ignorant that a maritime town has a port ? ' And this other — ' It is not ideas which are wanting ; it is in the execution, it is in the application, that things often go awry.' This does not prevent her, in 1774, from being on the point of going to Moscow herself in order to put down Pougatchef ; for, since the death of Bibikof, she knows not who can cope with him. She summons a council : Gregory Orlof declares that he has slept badly and has not an idea in his head ; Razoumofski and Galitzine are silent ; Patiomkine is for the man whom she chooses ; Panine alone has the courage to give advice, and his advice is that the Empress should appeal to his brother, General Panine, whose services she has long neglected, thinking that another would do equally well in his place. The peril being urgent, she submits, sacrifices her amour-propre, and Panine saves the crown THE ART OF RULING 47 and the empire. In 1788, after the first en counter with the Swedes, she court-martials three captains of frigates ; the next day she writes to Patiomkine : ' They deserve the gallows, but there is nobody else to put in their place, unless he falls from the sky.' With the multiplicity of her enterprises, and with her ideas on this point, which are but the expression of her caprices, she uses up a terrible number of men. Her maxim that ' affairs make men ' leads her to multiply to excess the number of functionaries. According to one testimony, if the two capitals and a few other larger towns are left out of the question, there is one functionary to every ten inhabitants in the provinces. And her idea that one man is worth as much as another causes her, for a mere nothing, for a word that offends her, for a cast of countenance that she finds unpleasing, or even without motive, for the pleasure of change and the delight of having to do with some one new, as she avows naively in a letter to Grimm, to set aside, disgraced or merely cashiered, one or another of her most devoted servants. In 1788 Rou miantsof, the greatest warrior whom Russia pro duced before Souvarof, is still alive, and well able to take the command, and Alexis Orlof, 48 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA the hero of Tchesme, is burning to renew his old exploits. He has had a certain apprentice ship to the trade, which he entered into in 1770, and a name that the enthusiasm of Catherine herself has surrounded with such an aureole, that his reputation is worth in itself a fleet or an army. But both the one and the other, Roumiantsof and Orlof, have long been sacrificed to Patiomkine, and Catherine is re duced to seeking generals and admirals in Eng land, in Holland, in Germany. At last she finds Nassau-Siegen, who, after having enchanted her by his matador airs and stage costumes, ere long costs her a fleet, and the shame of a disaster without precedent in the history of the young Russian navy. The extravagant optimism, which is part of the character of Catherine, and which colleagues like Nassau and Patiomkine assiduously encour age, has also to be observed. The story of the scene-painting on canvas, which, during the visit to the Crimea, is said to have represented the absent villages, has been disproved. It is not so very far from the truth, on the testimony even of those who have contested its reality. The Prince de Ligne is among these; he observes, nevertheless, that Catherine, never going on foot, THE ART OF RULING 49 could see no more than what was shown her, and imagined frequently that a town was built and inhabited, ' when this town had no streets, the streets no houses, and the houses no roofs, doors, or windows.' The Comte de Langeron, who was afterwards governor of these very provinces, and whose memoirs have not the slightest trace of retrospective hostility, goes even further. A proclamation of the governor of Harkof, Vassili Tchertkof, issued at the same time to announce to the inhabitants the coming of the sovereign and to instruct them in their duties on this solemn occasion, is equally characteristic in the same way. It is severely ordered that the in habitants are to dress themselves in their best clothes when her Majesty is expected to pass by. The girls are to have their hair carefully combed out and adorned with flowers. They are also to strew flowers on the Empress's path, and all the population is to ' express its delight by appropriate gestures and attitudes.' The houses on the route are to be repainted, the roofs repaired, the doors and windows decked with festoons, and, as far as possible, with rugs pleasing to the- eye. It is forbidden for any one to get drunk, or to present to her Majesty the smallest request ; this under penalty of the knout VOL. II. d So CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA and hard labour. The local magistrates will see to it in addition that the passage of the sovereign does not raise the price of food. Prince Chtcher- batof relates that at Moscow all the beggars had been put outside, so that the Empress should not see them. ' The Empress has looked, but not seen (vidiela i ne vidala),' he adds, with an un translatable play on words. This is how she came to be convinced that ' there were no hungry people in Russia.' She gives that assurance one day to Grimm ! But the conquest and the arrangement of the Tauric peninsula were, in the hands of Patiom kine, nothing but a colossal fderie mounted by that prodigious improvisatore and disappearing with him. It was difficult to decide, on seeing him at work, which to admire the most : his extraordinary activity and the fertility of his imagination, or the incredible navvetd with which both Catherine and himself take their creation, part madness, part fancy, part childish mystifica tion, absolutely au sdrieux. A desert is to be transformed into a cultivated and well-populated land, inhabited by industry and the arts, and this is to be done in a few years, as if by magic. Patiomkine sets to work. He plants forests in the Steppes, imports the seeds of all known THE ART OF RULING 51 vegetables, trains vines, cultivates mulberry-trees for silk-worms, builds manufactories, theatres, palaces, barracks, and cathedrals. He covers the peninsula with magnificent towns. The history of these towns is astounding. The examples which America offers to-day to our astonishment, in the same order of instantaneous improvisa tions, are outdone. In 1784 a site is wanted for the capital of the province, which is to be named ' Iekatierinoslaf ' — glory of Catherine. Two months after the site has been marked out, there is already a project for a university, open not only to natives, but also to the strangers who are expected to flock from all the corners of Europe. Soon an army of workmen appears on the right bank of the Dnieper, at the spot chosen, not far from a humble Tartar village called Kai'dak; Lieutenant Sinielnikof, who has charge of them, receives 200,000 roubles for the first cost, and the work commences. The town is to extend along the river about 25 versts, and to cover 300 square versts with streets 200 feet wide. There is to be a park, with a botanical garden, fish-pond, and different other embellish ments. In the middle is to be the palace of the Prince of Taurida, Patiomkine the magnificent. Around are the buildings apportioned to the 52 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA different services of the administration ; then come the dwellings of the workmen employed in building the town, the workshops, the manu factories, the houses of the coming population. Twelve large factories, one of them for silk fabrics, are planned, and the funds for establish ing them partly collected. A town-hall in the style of the old basilicas, a great bazaar in the style of the Propylaeum, a Bourse, a theatre, a Conservatoire of music, finally a cathedral on the model of St. Peter's, but larger, will be erected in various parts of the city, suitably chosen. The materials are ready, Patiomkine declares. In addition, professors are already summoned for the university and the conservatoire. The cele brated Sarti is to direct the latter. For the chair of history in the university a Frenchman named Guyenne is appointed, a soldier by profession. But these details must not be looked into too closely. An observatory too is thought of, and a sort of Quartier Latin for the students. Such are the plans ; now see the results. The palace of Patiomkine is built of conservatories, one for pine-apples, another for laurels and orange-trees, others again for pomegranates, dates, etc. The silk factory is also built. It costs 240,000 roubles, and works for two years, THE ART OF RULING 53 after which various reasons, the principal of which is a scarcity of material, bring it to an end. The silk-worm industry, for which a manager has been brought from abroad at a considerable salary, produces a maximum of twenty pounds of silk a year ! The remainder of the great city exists only in fancy. But Iekatierinoslaf had, all the same, a chance of becoming in time a little provincial town. Kherson, of which Joseph II. laid the first stone in 1787, saying that after him Catherine had laid the last, did not even arrive at this modest result. In other parts of the empire the rapid erection of administrative or industrial centres ran similar risks. In 1787 the poet Dierjavine, accompanying the governor of Petrosavodsk in a journey undertaken for the inauguration of a town which had been appointed chief town of the district, never reached the goal, he tells us : the town existed only on paper ! Nevertheless the Crimea was conquered and began to be populated. ' Such, in Russia,' said the Comte de Segur, ' is the double magic of absolute power and of passive obedience, that nobody murmurs, even though in want of everything, and things go on, although nothing has been prepared or looked after in advance.' 54 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA ' Things went on,' in fact, from one end to the other of Catherine's reign, and 'passive obe dience,' no doubt, had a large share in it. The adventure of Sutherland, the English banker at St. Petersburg, is well known. One day the chief of police, Ryleief, presents himself, and, with all sorts of excuses, communicates to him an order of the sovereign which concerns him, an order which he cannot but deplore, despite his respect for the will of her Majesty, but which it is out of his power not to execute. In a word, he has been ordered to stuff the unfortunate banker. Conceive of the poor man's fright ! Happily the mistake is discovered in time. The Empress had spoken of stuffing a favourite dog that she had lost, and the English name had put Ryleief on the wrong track. The English Dr. Dimsdale relates, in the notes he has left on his residence in Russia, that having wished to take the lymph for inoculating the Empress from a child belong ing to poor moujiks, the mother opposed it : according to the general belief, it meant the death of the child. But the father intervened : ' If the Empress ordered us to cut off both the child's legs, should we not do it ? ' Dimsdale adds nevertheless another characteristic. The sick child was placed in an overheated room, in THE ART OF RULING 55 a fetid atmosphere, the opening of a window, according to the parents, meaning certain death. But Dimsdale produced a rouble : he could open as much as he liked. The anecdote reveals another agent, universal and all-powerful, which the ways of the country put in the hands of Catherine. She did not fail to use it. She used it vigorously and to excess, after her usual style. She gave much, and let even more be taken. The waste of money in every branch of the administration was enormous. One day Catherine, in the midst of a violent headache, could not suppress a smile : ' She did not wonder that she was suffering so much, for she had seen in the accounts that she used apoud (over thirty pounds) of powder every day for her hair ! ' This detail enables one to judge of the rest. But the accounts that Harris sent to the English court, with the detail of 'tens of thou sands of pounds sterling' used by his French colleagues in corrupting the functionaries of the Empress, were not less fanciful. The Baron de Breteuil was the sole French minister at this epoch who was empowered to employ in this manner a considerable sum, to the extent of a million of francs ; and he never made use of the permission. His successors had something to do 56 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA to obtain a few ten thousand pounds intended for the buying over of certain influences or certain secret documents. And these attempts, con sidered even at Versailles as useless or dangerous, had not as a rule any success during the reign of Catherine. A functionary of the Empress, who had, or appeared to have, a great fancy for a fine coach made in Paris, thought better of it before he had received the present, and informed the sovereign, who dictated to him herself an ironi cally-polite letter of refusal. After the Baron de Breteuil, in the long series of agents repre senting the French policy who succeeded him at St. Petersburg, the Comte de S6gur was the only one who succeeded in exercising any particular influence, and money, which he would have found it very difficult to raise, had no share in this. From 1762 to the death of Catherine, there was only one great corrupting influence in her empire — and that was herself. It is certain that she used it mainly for the good of the empire, as she conceived it, and that she found in it the resources for the accomplishment of great things. It is not less certain that morality had to suffer for it, and that the influence of ideas and customs thus implanted in the national genius, THE ART OF RULING 57 was destined to exercise on its later development a long and untoward action. We shall now endeavour to pass rapidly in review the results obtained by means of all these resources as they were wielded in the hands of the sovereign. CHAPTER II HOME POLICY Happy is the nation without a history : from 1775 the Russian people counted, in point of view of the home policy, among the happy nations. After the great effort which she had to make in putting down the revolt of Pougatchef, Catherine found herself at first fatigued, then disenchanted, and finally absorbed by her foreign policy, by the conquest of the Crimea, the second Turkish war, the second and third division of Poland, and the anti-revolutionary campaign. Up to 1775 she asserted, and had need to assert, her exuberant activity in every direction. She had first to defend her throne against a series of more or less threatening attempts. A series of repressive measures, more or less calculated to add to her glory, corresponded with them. In October 1762 a certain Peter Hrouchtchof was accused, with the brothers Simon, Ivan, and HOME POLICY S9 Peter Gourief, of having plotted for the re- establishment on the throne of Ivan of Brunswick, shut up since 1741 in prison. Having been condemned, together with his accomplices, to transportation to the government of Oremburg, Hrouchtchof took part in 1772 in the revolt of the exiles in Siberia, under the leadership of the famous Beniowski. He succeeded in escaping, after a series of romantic adventures, reached the west of Europe by way of America, and served in the French army in the rank of captain. This conspiracy, true or false, for the reality of the criminal intentions imputed to the accused seems not to have been clearly established, has often been confused with another later event, in which the Princess Dachkof was compromised. In May 1763, during Catherine's visit to Moscow on the occasion of her coronation, fresh arrests for high treason were commanded by the Empress. But the unhappy Ivan, languishing in his prison, was not the cause this time. It was quite another affair. There had been a rumour that Catherine intended to marry Gregory Orlof. Some of those who had taken the most active part in the elevation of the new Czarina, Fedor Hitrovo at their head, judged the interests of the empire endangered by this real or imaginary 60 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA project. They formed a plot to hinder the Empress from carrying it out, or, in case of her persisting, to kill the favourite. Hitrovo, the first to be arrested, named as accomplices, Panine, Hliebof, Tieplof, Passek, the greater part of the heroes of the 12th of July, and the Princess Dachkof. He afterwards contradicted his assertions, and declared that he had only had to do with more obscure friends, the two brothers Roslavlef and Lasounski. Princess Dachkof, on being examined, declared proudly that she knew nothing in the matter, but that, if she had known anything, she would have kept silence just the same. Moreover, if the Empress wished to bring her head to the scaffold, after she had helped to set the crown on hers, she was prepared ! The affair had no very serious consequences. Hitrovo alone was exiled in the government of Orel. A ukase was also proclaimed in the streets of Moscow, to the sound of the drum, a ukase which was merely the repetition of an earlier act of Elizabeth's government (June 5, 1757), by which it was forbidden to the inhabitants to occupy themselves with matters which did not concern them. The affairs of state in general were com prised in the enumeration of subjects thus denoted. The interdiction was renewed in 1772. HOME POLICY 61 Almost at the same time, a priest, the Arch bishop of Rostof, Arsene Matsieievitch, raised the standard of revolt in a much more audacious manner. The policy of Catherine in regard to the orthodox clergy did not fail to give rise to well-established criticisms. On coming to the throne she had pronounced vigorously against the measures by which Peter III. had brought about the disaffection, if not the active opposi tion, of the church. She had reopened the private chapels, closed by order of the Czar, forbidden the performance of pagan plays at the theatre, reinforced the censorship of books ; finally, she had put an end to the secularisation of ecclesiastical property. Suddenly she changed her mind, and revoked all these measures in protection of interests which she thought it no longer needful to consult. A part of the goods returned to their former possessors was the object of fresh claims. The clergy in general bowed the head, as they had done before. Arsene alone rose in defence of the common rights thus outraged. He went so far as to introduce into the ritual certain new formulas which, under colour of menacing the enemies of the church, were levelled directly against the Empress. Arrested and brought before the 62 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA sovereign, he broke out into language so violent that her Majesty was obliged to cover her ears. He was condemned to be degraded from his office, and shut up in a cloister, where he was employed, by express order, in the meanest work, in fetching water and chopping wood. Four years later, after a new attempt at revolt, he was removed from the cloister to a better-guarded prison. The fortress of Revel was selected in order that he might not be able to talk in Russian with his keepers, who only understood Lithuanian. He changed his name, and called himself the peasant Andre Vrai, that is to say, liar, or Brodi- giaguine, that is to say, brigand. He died in 1772. A year afterwards, a shopkeeper named Smoline renewed the protest of the unfortunate bishop against the infringement of the rights of the clergy. In a letter addressed to the Empress, and filled with the most virulent invectives, he openly accused the sovereign of having ap propriated the goods of the church in order to distribute them to Orlof and other favourites. He ended with this apostrophe : ' Thou hast a heart of stone like Pharaoh. ... Of what chastise ment art thou not worthy, thou who every day dost chastise robbers and brigands ! ' Catherine proved that the mad creature calumniated her HOME POLICY 63 by showing him mercy. Smoline was only im prisoned for five years, after which, at his own request, he was made a monk, and nothing more was heard of him. Nevertheless, in 1764, the death of Ivan of Brunswick had already added another stain of blood to that which the drama of Ropcha left on the dazzling horizon of the new reign. Ivan, it may be remembered, was the little Emperor of two years old, dethroned in 1741 by Elizabeth. Shut up at first with the rest of his family at Holmogory, on the White Sea, then, alone, in the fortress of Schlusselburg, he had grown up in the shadow of the dungeon. He was said to be weak-minded and to stutter ; but he had reigned, and such another act of violence as the one that had dethroned him might reinstate him on the throne : he remained a menace. He gave some anxiety to Voltaire himself, who foresaw that the philosophers would not find in him a friend. In September 1764 he disappeared. The incident has given rise to contradictory tales and comments, in which history is quite at a loss. To oblige his imperial benefactress, the patriarch of Ferney was good enough to ' arrange ' the incident. Others have done the same, Catherine the first of all. Here are the known facts. An 64 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA officer of the name of Mirovitch, on guard at the fortress of Schliisselburg, induced a party of men under his command to render him assistance in setting free the 'Czar.' But Ivan had two guardians, to whom the strict command had been given to kill him rather than let him escape. They killed him. Catherine was suspected of complicity in the murder : she was thought to have planned the whole thing with Mirovitch, He, it is true, let himself be judged, condemned, and executed without a word ; but had he not been made to believe that he would be reprieved at the last moment ? Precedents existed ; under Elizabeth, several high dignitaries, Osterman among others, had profited by the imperial clemency at the very moment when their head rested on the block. There were certain curious details in the trial : on the express command of the Empress, no attempt was made to find other accomplices, likely as they were to be found, in the crime. The relatives of Mirovitch were not interfered with. It would be unreasonable to try to prove an accusation on such vague grounds. Catherine showed once again, in these circumstances, the force of mind which she possessed. She was travelling in Livonia when the news reached HOME POLICY 65 her. She did not hasten her return, or make any change in her itinerary. But the great crisis in home affairs was that of I77I-I775- At all times, up to the begin ning of this century at least, Russia has been the home of pretenders. From the first half of the seventeenth century, after the extinction of the dynasty of Rourik, they followed one another at brief intervals. Under Catherine the series was almost interminable. In 1765 two deserters, Gavrilo Kremnief and Ievdokimof, successively assumed the name of Peter III. In 1769 there was a fresh apparition of the murdered Czar, and it was once more a deserter, Mamykine, who assumed the tragic and am bitious mask. Emelian Pougatchef is thus only the continuation of a series. But this time Catherine has not to do with an obscure plot or a puerile attempt, which a few blows of the knout or the axe will soon set right. A whole tempest is let loose after the wild Samozvaniets, a storm which threatens to shake the throne and the foundations of the empire in a general downfall of the whole political and social structure. It is no more a mere duel between usurpers more or less well-armed for the defence or the con quest of a crown, which has so long been at vol. 11. e 66 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA the disposal of whoever can seize upon it. The contest has another name and another bearing. It is a contest between the modern state, which Catherine is endeavouring to extricate from the unfinished materials left by Peter I. to his heirs, and the primitive state, in which the mass of the people persist in still living ; between organi sation and the inorganic disorder, which is the natural mode of existence of savage nations ; between centralisation and the centrifugal force which is peculiar to that state of nature. It is also the cry of that misery, in which the depths of the populace lie buried, rising against the improvised splendour of a class, how con fined ! of privileged persons. It is the obscure protestation of the national conscience against the panegyrics of philosophers and poets, of Voltaire and Dierjavine, chanting the splendours of the new reign. For if Catherine, on the heights on which she is surrounded by her crowd of dignitaries and favourites, by all the pomp and majesty of her supreme rank, has done much already to give incomparable lustre to her name, her power, her own greatness, she has done as yet nothing, or almost nothing, for those under her, for the poor, the lowly, who toil and suffer as in the past, who have no HOME POLICY 67 share in these triumphs and conquests on high, who know nothing of them, save to be ex asperated by the reflection which does but light up the depths of their own misery. Among these, the short reign of Peter III. had awakened hopes and left behind it regrets. The seculari sation of the estates of the clergy, begun by the Emperor, had seemed to lead the way towards the enfranchisement of the serfs, and did indeed point in that direction, for the serfs belonging to the secularised domains became free. We have seen that Catherine put an end to this. Peter had also inaugurated a system of absolute tolerance in regard to religious dissent. He had no wish to keep special watch over the welfare of the orthodox church. Legend, as usual, exaggerated his merits. The skoptsi, or mutilators, in particular, venerated in him a saint and martyr of their cause. His affiliation to their sect was, they imagined, the real reason of his death ; and the accidents of his married life lent some colour to these fables. Catherine, as we have seen, did not follow in this respect either the course of her husband, and what had made her victorious now turned against her. The raskol played a considerable part in the movement of insurrection, and with it all the 68 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA elements of discontent and disorder, even to the turbulent restlessness of the Asiatic races, now in conflict, in the neighbourhood of Kasan and of Moscow, with the Russifying headship of the state : all that entered into conflict with the state and the rdgime which it made and maintained. Emelian Pougatchef was merely the instrument, the nominal leader of this general uprising of the rancours and appetites of an immense proletariat. Yet earlier, scattered instances of revolt among the serfs attached to the soil had often been seen. In 1768, in the government of Moscow alone, there were nine cases of proprietors killed by their peasants. The following year there were eight more, and among the victims was one of the heroes of the Seven Years' War, General Leontief, taken prisoner on the battlefield of Zorndorf, and married to a sister of the victorious Roumiantsof. Emelian Pougatchef was the son of a Cossack of the Don. He too had taken part in the Seven Years' War, where he had distinguished himself, had served also against the Turks, and had then deserted. He was captured, escaped again, and entered upon the career of an outlaw and brigand, by which he came in time to the sanguinary drama which brought HOME POLICY 69 his life to an end. The fact of an accidental resemblance with Peter III., which rendered his imposition more practicable, has been denied, and seems to rest on no serious authority. The portraits of the Samozvaniets which have reached us show no trace of likeness. Peter III. had the face of a grimacing ape; Pou gatchef s was of the common type of the Russian moujik. He took the name of the deceased Emperor as others had taken it before him. But he had the fatal luck to appear at the hour marked for the social convulsion, whose causes we have indicated. He did not start the movement, which had long been gathering force ; it was rather the movement that bore him with it. He did not even try to direct its course. He put himself at its head and rushed forward blindly, urged on by the tumul tuous and threatening flood. It was a terrible course, covering with smoking ruins a half of the empire. After four years, the disciplined force of the organised element got the better of the savage element. Pougatchef, conquered and made prisoner by one of the lieutenants of Panine, was brought to Moscow in a wooden cage, condemned to death, and executed. The headsman cut off his head before quartering 70 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA him. Catherine declared that it was by her order : she wished to appear more clement than Louis XV. had been with Damiens. She had nevertheless other injuries and other crimes to avenge. The victims made by Pougatchef and his band were beyond all reckoning, and Cathe rine had been greatly terrified, whatever sallies, more or less witty, she may have sent to Voltaire on the subject of the ' Marquis de Pougatchef.' An odd characteristic of this incident, but odd in a way which is often seen in similar circum stances, was that, while revolting against the state, as they saw it under Catherine's organisa-^ tion, Pougatchef and his companions could only copy this organisation, ape it at least, even to the smallest details of its outer forms. After having married a daughter of the people, the false emperor gave her a species of court of honour. Young peasants, beaten into trim, played the freiline with immense grotesqueness, attempting ceremonious reverences and a respectful way of kissing the hand. To increase the illusion of his supposed sovereignty, Pougatchef even went the length of naming his principal lieutenants after the principal members of the court of Catherine : the Cossack Tchika took the name of Tcherni- chef, with the title of field-marshal ; others were HOME POLICY 71 called Count Vorontsof, Count Panine, Count Orlof, etc. This comedy cost dear to every one. It took from Catherine the last remains of her former enthusiasm for the redress of social iniquities ; Russia, apart from immense material losses, had probably that of a reign which had seemed to be fruitful in great humanitarian reforms. The home policy of Catherine preserved to the last, as we have intimated, the trace of these terrible years, like the scar of blows received and rendered in a fight which was a fight to the death. There were others among the dead than those who perished by fire or steel. Some of the ideas that Catherine had brought with her to the government of the empire remained behind on the field of battle ; and perhaps they were among the best that she had brought. In regard to the department of police, Cathe rine's rdgime, from 1775 especially, was, in a sense, a rdgime of reaction against that which Peter III. had inaugurated. Peter had suppressed the sinister secret chancellorship, the shameful heirloom of a time which Russia hoped never to see again. Catherine would not re-establish the institution with its hateful obsolete forms, but little by little, without using the name, she re- 72 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA stored something very like the thing. She had Stephen Ivanovitch Chechkofski. A legend has been formed about this mysterious functionary, whom Catherine was never without. The reality, without equalling the horror of the memories left by the functionaries of Ivan Vassilevich, was doubtless of a kind to cast some shadow on the reputation that the friend of philosophers desired to preserve in Europe. In her hands it was a cunning and hypocritical machine of state. Chechkofski had neither official titles corre sponding with his position nor apparent organisa tion of his inquisitorial work. But his hand and eye were everywhere. He seemed to possess the gift of ubiquity. He never arrested any one : he sent out an invitation to dinner, which no one dared refuse. After dinner, there was conversa tion, and the walls of the comfortable and'discreet abode betrayed none of the secrets of these conversations. A particular chair was, it seems, set aside for the guest, whom a word, amiable but significant, had induced to cross the formidable threshold. Suddenly the chair, in which he had politely been motioned to be seated, tightened upon him, and descended with him to the floor below, in such a manner, however, that the head and shoulders of the personage remained above. HOME POLICY 73 The victim thus preserved his incognito from the assistants of Chechkofski, who subjected the lower part of the body to more or less rigorous treatment. Chechkofski himself turned away at this moment, and appeared to ignore what was passing. The performance finished, and the chair restored to its place, the host turned about, and smilingly took up the conversation at the point where it had been interrupted by this little surprise. It is said that a young man, fore warned of what awaited him, used his presence of mind, and his great muscular strength, to thrust Chechkofski himself into the place reserved for him on the fatal seat. After this he took to flight. The rest can be imagined. Chechkofski died in 1 794, leaving a large fortune. 11 The great ensemble of laws which Catherine proposed, in 1767, to graft upon Russia, on the model of Montesquieu and Beccaria, was destined never to be achieved, despite certain legislative experiments, done always by fits and starts. The main reason for this, apart from many secondary reasons, is that the work could only be done by beginning at the beginning, and the 74 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA beginning was the reform, if not the suppression, of serfdom. This question, be it said to the honour of Catherine, is one of those that occupied her mind the most. When she was yet Grand Duchess, she had, as we have seen, certain projects, quite impracticable indeed, for the enfranchisement of the peasants belonging to the soil. She had found in books, one knows not where, the history of a general and simultaneous emancipation of serfs in Germany, France, Spain, and other coun tries, — the work of a council ! She asked herself if a meeting of archimandrites could not produce the same excellent result in Russia. On reaching the throne she inaugurated the great work by reforming the condition of the serfs in the matter of the ecclesiastical estates confiscated by the Treasury : the peasants, included there, were subjected simply to a light poll-tax ; all that they gained in addition was their own property, and they could free themselves altogether for a moderate amount. It was the offer of liberty as a premium on the labour and industry of those concerned; and it was a fruitful idea. Its carry ing out was not without inconveniences : the despoiled monks found themselves all at once reduced to beggary. According to the Marquis HOME POLICY 75 de Bausset, they had only about eight roubles a year per head to live on ; they were forced to beg on the roads ; and the degradation of the Russian clergy, one of the most melancholy features of modern Russia, may well be derived, in part at least, from this. But there were about a million peasants enfranchised, or about to be. It was a beginning. For further progress, Catherine counted on her legislative commission. She had to alter her course, as we have seen. Her In struction had in this respect to be retouched as we have indicated. The great mass of peasants belonging with the soil had not even a repre sentative in the assembly, which merely discussed to whom they should belong. Every one sought after this right : the shopkeepers laid claim to it, and also the clergy, and even the Cossacks, jealous of reclaiming their privileges. This re luctance to admit her humanitarian ideas vexed Catherine. Some notes written at this period give us a curious glimpse of her impressions : ' If it is not possible to admit the personality of a serf, he is not a man. Call him an animal, and we shall win the respect of the whole world. . . . The law of serfdom rests on an honest principle established for animals by animals.' But the deputies of the commission did not 76 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA read these notes, and probably they would have made no difference to their feelings. On all sides Catherine found an invincible opposition. By 1766 she had already proposed to the Society of Political Economy, founded under her auspices, a question concerning the right of the labourer to the land which he has watered with his sweat. A hundred and twenty replies were sent, in Russian, French, German, and Latin. It was Bearde de I'Abbaye, member of the Academy of Dijon, who won the prize of a thousand ducats. But, by thirteen voices against three, the society opposed the publication of his work. Catherine finally persuaded herself that the problem was for the present insoluble and dangerous to approach. The revolt of Pougat chef confirmed her in this idea. In the course of a conversation which she had at this time with the head of the excise office, V. Dahl, she ex pressed the fear that in raising the question there might result a revolution like that in America. She had evidently very vague notions as to what was happening at this moment across the ocean. ' Who knows, however ? ' she added ; ' I have succeeded in so many other things!' In 1775, writing to her Attorney-General, Prince Via- zemski, she insisted again on the necessity of HOME POLICY 77 doing something for the unhappy serfs, without which ' they will sooner or later take the liberty that we refuse them.' Count Bloudof professes to have seen in the Empress's hands, in 1784, a projected ukase ruling that the serfs born after 1785 should be free. This ukase never saw the light. In the papers of the Empress, found after her death, there is another project concerning the organisation of freedmen, notably the nine hun dred thousand serfs who had been emancipated by the secularisation of the ecclesiastical estates. This document has been published in the 20th volume of the Recueil de la Socidtd d 'Histoire (of Russia). The -numerous corrections on the original, written throughout in Catherine's hand writing, prove that she worked over it a long time. She only arrived, however, at the some what odd, and probably impracticable, idea of an application of municipal institutions to the very different conditions of rural life. This con ception remained equally barren. There were many reasons why it should be so. In fact, the elevation of Catherine in 1762 had been the work of the nobility, or at least of the upper classes, and not that of the people. It was therefore essential that the new Czarina should stand by this element, and be, in the 78 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA first place, sure of it. Besides, even before her accession to the throne, the ' philosophical mind ' of Catherine, and her liberalism, did not prevent her from a certain preference for the old families, as we see plainly in her memoirs. In course of time she substituted little by little for the old aristocracy of the Narychkines, the Saltykofs, the Galitzines, an aristocracy of recent creation, the Orlofs, the Patiomkines. But this was merely an exchange. On the other side, it is easy to see how a liberal of the stamp of Diderot could easily, after having examined the question of Prussian serfdom with the Princess Dachkof, come to the conclusion that a radical reform on this point would be premature. The observations of the Princess sufficed to shake, in the mind of the philosopher, convictions formed and nourished during twenty years. Probably something of this appeared in the conversations that Diderot afterwards had with Catherine herself. And ten years later, the Comte de Sdgur, having doubtless seen the peasants through the windows of the imperial coach, calmly expressed the conviction that their lot left nothing to desire. Catherine was bound to end, as indeed she did, by becoming per suaded of it herself. In her notes on the book HOME POLICY 79 of Radistchef, an avowed and inflexible liberal, who, in 1790, thought it was still possible to act on the principles of philosophy, and paid dear for his error, the Empress goes the length of declaring, as an incontestable fact, that there is no peasant in the world better treated than the Russian peasant, and no master more kind and humane than a proprietor of serfs in Russia ! To know the real truth in the matter, it is need less to go very deeply into the examination of the facts, facts which resemble those of a martyro- logy. As an example of the humanity shown by the Russian lords to the serfs belonging to them, the Comte de Segur has pointed in his memoirs to a certain Countess Saltykof. It is an unfortunate instance. The early years of the reign of Catherine were filled with the re port of the trial and condemnation of a Countess Daria Saltykof, accused of having put to death, by means of refined tortures, a hundred and thirty-eight of her serfs of both sexes. Seventy- five victims, one of them a girl of fifteen, were proved with certainty by the inquiry. And yet, despite the outcry of popular indignation, which has made the name of the Saltytchiha a fearful memory, Catherine dared not do complete justice. The more or less voluntary accomplices of the So CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA horrible woman, the pope who presided at the burial of the victims, and the valet who flogged them, received the knout in one of the squares of Moscow ; the Countess Saltykof escaped with penal servitude for life. Even this, however, denoted a progress ; under the reign of Elizabeth, under that of Peter III., these very facts, uni versally known, remained unpunished. The knout was brought into play merely upon those who had denounced these abominable crimes ! The case of the Saltytchiha was exceptional ; the rule, however, was cruel enough. The law appointed no limit to the right of proprietors, in regard to the corporal chastisement of their serfs. It authorised them to send them to Siberia. It was a means of peopling the vast solitudes of the land of exile. Catherine added the power of completing the exile by hard labour. For the rest, the law was dumb, as in the past. And the jurisprudence varied. In 1762 the senate sentenced to transportation a proprietor who had flogged a peasant to death. But in 1 76 1 an identical act was punished merely by religious penance. A curious document has come down to us, a list of punishments inflicted, in the year 1 75 1 and onward, on the estates of Count P. Roumiantsof. It is distressing to read ; HOME POLICY a very nightmare. For entering his masters' room while they were asleep, and thus disturbing their sleep, a servant is flogged and condemned to the loss of his name : he is to be called only by an insulting nickname, any one infringing this order to suffer five thozisand blows of the stick, without mercy. Five thousand blows of the stick are, however, far from constituting a maxi mum. A sort of criminal code, in use on the same estates, includes much severer chastise ments. It is further provided that the applica tion of these penalties is not to cause too much inconvenience to the proprietor, by depriving him too long of the labour of the beaten servants.. It is ruled that a man who has received seven teen thousand (sic) blows of the stick, or a hundred blows of the knout — the two are con sidered equivalent — is not to remain in bed more than a week. If he is longer in rising and re turning to work, he will be deprived of food. This code was in force during the reign of Catherine. It corresponds pretty well with the general practice. In fact, after all her contra dictory tentatives, Catherine took the initiative in this direction only in two cases, both of them a distinct aggravation of the existing rdgime. In re gard to the treatment of the serfs by their masters, VOL. II. F 82 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA by suppressing the right of direct appeal to the sovereign, she suppressed the sole corrective, indeed a very insufficient one, which might, in a certain measure, have attenuated these monstrous abuses. Those who had complaints were sent to their proprietors, that is to say, to the butchers themselves ; and there the lash was applied. In 1765 a ukase of the senate substituted for the penalty of the lash that of the knout and hard labour. In 1779 a French painter of the name of Velly, employed to paint the portrait of the Empress, was near making the acquaintance of this new legislation, having taken advantage of a sitting to present a petition to her Majesty. A diplomatic intervention was required to rescue] him from the consequences of his false step. In regard to the law of serfdom itself, the great work of Catherine's reign was the introduction of the Russian common law in the ancient Polish pro vinces of Lesser Russia, that is to say, the trans formation of the free peasants into serfs belonging with the soil. In 1774, in talking with Diderot, who spoke with some disgust of the dirtiness that he had noticed in the peasants round St. Petersburg, the Empress demanded : ' Why should they look after a body which is not their own ? ' This HOME POLICY 83 bitter word, if it was really said, sums up a state of things with which she had finally come to reconcile her humanitarian aspiration. In 1789, in a series of advertisements in the Gazette de St. Pdtersbourg (No. 36), side by side with the offer of a Holstein stallion for sale, we find that of some copies of the Instruction pour la Com mission Ldgislative, and lower down these lines — ' Any one wishing to buy an entire family, or a young man and a girl separately, may inquire at the silk-washer's, opposite the church of Kasan. The young man, named Ivan, is twenty-one years of age ; he is healthy, robust, and can curl a lady's hair. The girl, well-made and healthy, named Marfa, aged fifteen, can do sewing and embroidery. They can be examined, and are to be had at a reasonable price.' This sums up what Catherine left to her suc cessor by way of result, in regard to her work as legislator. ' As she is ambitious of all sorts of fame,' wrote the Comte de Segur in 1786, 'she wishes to lay claim, during the peace, to that of legislator ; but her subjects have put more obstacles in her way than her enemies, . . . and she has been forced to acknowledge that it is unfortunately easier to make great conquests than good laws.' 84 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA At the same time, sending a memorandum on the general state of the legislation in Russia, the work of his brother, M. d' Aguesseau, he added the following reflections : — ' The result of his work will be one more proof of this truth, that in a land of slaves there can be neither good laws nor good morals, that every thing becomes corrupt before being civilised, that there is an inevitable lack of light and help, and that all things betray the irrationality of despotism, even the very measures that are in tended to restrain and modify it.' At the top of his memorandum D'Aguesseau had put this line of Du Bellay : ' Plus je vois l'etranger, plus j'aime ma patrie.' in In regard to the administration of justice, Catherine's reign is distinguished by several important reforms, whose merit, however, has been very variously appreciated. Mercier de la Riviere expressed great enthusiasm in regard to an organisation of provincial tribunals put in force after the peace with Turkey in 1774. In the memoirs of a contemporary (Vinski), perhaps a better judge, these tribunals are referred to with not nearly so much praise. The reform has HOME POLICY 85 merely put 320 judges where there had formerly been 50, that is to say, in a government divided, according to the new regulations, into four districts with 80 judges each. ' The most obvious result of this benefit to the poor farmer is that instead of three sheep he must now bring fifteen a year to the town,' in order to keep in well with justice. All that, adds Vinski, may be good to dazzle strangers, and make them admire the Semiramis of the North ; for us Russians 'it is a mere puppet-play.' Catherine also did her best to quicken the march of justice, always desperately slow. In 1 769 a tradesman of Moscow, Popof, having been driven by the exasperating intricacies of procedure into crying aloud in open court that there was no justice in Russia under the reign of Catherine II., the Empress had these audacious words erased from the minutes of proceedings, but she com manded, at the same time, that the affairs of Popof should be settled with the greatest despatch, ' so that he might see that there was justice in Russia.' The sovereign's zeal was praiseworthy ; it pro duced, as a rule, but little effect. The machine was too cumbersome for any one hand, even as energetic as hers, to regulate the heavy wheels. In 1785 some French shipowners were still 86 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA awaiting at St. Petersburg the settlement of certain indemnities due to them for the losses they had endured in the first Turkish war. The Comte de Segur, who had exerted himself on their behalf, wrote that he could obtain no more than a postponement from day to day instead of from week to week. He added — ' As for the actual debts, I will certainly do what I can, but I guarantee in advance that it will be useless. The English minister and I are convinced by sad experience that it is impossible here to get the money for letters of credit when the debtor refuses to pay. The laws are explicit, but the corruption of the judges, the indolence of the tribunals, custom and precedent, are always in his favour. The Empress has at this moment to decide the case of the Sieur Prory of Lyon, and the debtor says openly that if it is possible to make him lose his case, it will be at least quite impossible to make him pay. This inconceivable negligence in the execution of the ukases relative to debts is caused by the general disorder of the principal people here, who are all in a state of ruin, and who protect the knavery of the Russian merchants who prop them up. ' The initiative of the Empress, and her supreme right of justice, are frequently put in force, and HOME POLICY 87 in the most effectual manner, as we have already intimated, in the mitigation of the excessive severities to which the ordinary jurisdictions still cling. Catherine boasted that she had never signed a death-warrant. She nevertheless allowed both Pougatchef and Mirovitch to be brought to the scaffold. But she employed a subterfuge for these exceptional cases : declaring herself directly implicated in the case of those outrages which were to be punished, she would occasionally renounce her prerogative as high justiciary, in order, as she said, that she might not be at once judge and party. In general, she substituted transportation for capital punishment, and even for the lash. She nevertheless allowed the knout to be sometimes used, even as a means of coercion, in order to obtain the confession of the accused. It must be understood what this kind of torture was. 'The knout was a whip with a leather thong prepared in such a manner that it possessed at once the elasticity of gutta-percha and the hardness of steel. Wielded by an execu tioner, who took a spring to strike with greater force, the thong cut into the flesh to the very bone, and left at every blow a deep furrow. A hundred blows were considered the limit, beyond which the resistance, that is to say the life, of the CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA patient, even if exceptionally vigorous, could not go. In general, the ' subjects ' lost consciousness at the tenth or fifteenth blow. To continue, was soon to flog a dead body. The skill of the torturer consisted in taking aim, so as to lengthen out the bloody slashes on the patient's back, one by the side of another, without taking away an inch of flesh. At the moment of striking, the zaplietchnik (so called because he put the whip- hand behind his shoulder to give more force to the blow) cried to the patient : Bieriegis ! (Look out! or, literally, get aside) as a last touch of irony. In the torture-chambers the knout was commonly combined with the strappado ; the patient was flogged after having been sus pended in the air by the arms, which had been pinioned behind the . back, so as to put the shoulders out of joint, and cause an intolerable pain. We know that Catherine was resolutely op posed to the use of torture. Nevertheless, in the course of a trial which lasted from 1765 to 1774, in connection with some fires, the torture was applied three times to the accused. A legend, of which we cannot verify the source, shows the sovereign, in the part of high justiciary, brought into contact with what is called to-day HOME POLICY 89 ' un crime passionnel.' The case is very compli cated. A young peasant, the child of rich parents, is in love with a poor young man. Surprised by the father, she hides her lover under the mattress of the common bed ; promiscuity in sleeping ac commodation being then general in Russia, even among well-to-do people of this class. The father stretches himself on the bed, and the unlucky man is stifled. A neighbour comes in. On hearing what has happened, he takes the corpse and throws it into the sea. But in return he forces the girl to become his mistress. She has a child, whom he also drowns. Then he becomes in want of money, and demands it from the girl, who, in order to satisfy him, steals from her father. Finally, he makes her go with him to the tavern, so that he may parade his conquest. She goes, but, on coming out of the tavern, she sets- it on fire. It burns, with all who are in it. She is arrested, and convicted of theft, infanticide, and incendiarism. The tribunals condemn her. Catherine sets her free, restricting her punish ment to a religious penance. IV It is in the domain of administration, properly so called, that Catherine, from one end to the 90 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA other of her reign, showed the most sustained, and, to a certain point, the most fruitful activity. She concerned herself with everything. We have a very voluminous personal work of hers on the establishment of manufactures. On the other hand, she takes it into her head, in 1783, to reform the toilette of the lords and ladies of her court, in order to render it less costly : this reform is not at all pleasing to the manufacturers. Elizabeth, we are told by Count Galovkine, in his memoirs, forced the beautiful Narychkine to wear her dresses without a hoop, in order that the charms of her figure did not too much outdo her own beauty. For less personal reasons Catherine had recourse to sumptuary laws, and the Grand Duchess Paul, on returning from Paris, is obliged to send back, without even un packing them, the marvels that the famous Mademoiselle Bertin had put in her boxes. In general, it must be said, notwithstanding energy and good intentions, the initiative of the sovereign is shown in this direction, as in others, without either consistency or any particular knowledge of things, fragmentary, capricious, and at the beck of chance. 'There are too many undertakings in this empire,' writes the Comte de Segur, in 1787; HOME POLICY 91 ' the disorder that follows on the heels of pre cipitation spoils the greater part of the best ideas. At the same time, there is an attempt to form a tiers dtat, attract foreign commerce, establish manufactures of all kinds, extend agriculture, increase the paper currency, raise the rate of exchange, build in towns, people deserts, cover the Black Sea with a new fleet, conquer a neigh bouring country, bind down another, and extend the influence of Russia over all Europe. Certainly this is undertaking a great deal.' Catherine, too, had to fight with enormous difficulties. During the first year of her reign she discovered that in the Senate, where the most complex questions regarding the administra tion of the country were being debated, there was no map indicating the position of the governmental centres, whose affairs were settled without the least notion whether they were on the Black Sea or the White Sea. She sent a messenger to the Academy of Sciences with five roubles to bring one. She worked energetically at the repression of the many and extravagant abuses which had crept into the procedure of all the branches of local government, and Russia is indebted to her for much serious progress in this respect; yet there too the task proved to be beyond her 92 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA strength. One day she sent an officer of her guard, Moltchanof, to Moscow, to give a reversion of judgment, and clear up certain official corrup tions which had been brought to her notice. Moltchanof required a passport for the journey. Russia has always been the land of passports. He lost three days in going about from office to office in order to obtain one. Meanwhile the delinquents, duly forewarned, had had time to put everything in order. A vast and shameless corruption spreads from top to bottom of the ladder of government. In 1770, during the plague of Moscow, the police officers arranged with the health officers to levy contributions on the rich bourgeois of the city. They were denounced as suspects ; the doctor, under pretence of ex amining them, smeared nitrate of silver over their hands ; black spots soon appeared, the supposed plague-stricken people were put in quarantine : if they did not buy themselves out, their houses were pillaged. At St. Petersburg even, a trust worthy witness, the inspector of police, Longpre, sent over from Paris in 1783, on a judicial mission, points out the most shocking disorders : streets unguarded, fires destroying, at every instant, whole quarters of the town, etc. About the same time, the English envoy, Harris, HOME POLICY 93 mentions the case of one of his compatriots who, ' having been robbed of a large sum of money, tries in vain to obtain redress from the under- officers of police, and ends by going to the lieutenant of police in person, whom he finds at ten o'clock in the morning employed in working out combinations with a packet of dirty cards. One of the most durable, beneficial, and best managed works of Catherine was the Foundling Asylum, erected in 1763. Privileges and favours, such as no benevolent institution ever received before, were granted to this estab lishment : exemption from taxes and statute- labour, powers of legal self-government, personal liberty of inmates, and of those employed in their care, monopoly of the lottery, share in benefits at the theatre, etc. A revenue of 50,000 roubles was assigned by the Empress for the mainten ance of the Asylum, while a philanthropist, Procope Demidof, erected the huge buildings at his cost. Betzki, appointed director, put into it his whole fortune (about two millions of francs) and twenty years of assiduous toil. A work published by him in 1775, under the title, Plans et Statuts des diffdrents Etabhssements ordonnds par I' Impdratrice Catherine pour T Education de la Jeunesse, gives a good idea of the greatness of 94 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA the scheme. Diderot, who superintended its translation and publication at the Hague, added a note in which we find these lines : — ' When time and the steadfastness of this great sovereign shall have brought (these establish ments) to the point of perfection of which they are all susceptible, and which some have reached, people will go to Russia for the purpose of seeing them, as people formerly went to Egypt, Lace- demon, and Crete, but with a curiosity which will, I venture to think, be better founded and better rewarded.' By this time people are, indeed, beginning to visit Russia. It is true that it is not precisely with the object that Diderot prophesied. But perhaps we must still wait for the accomplishment of his prophecy. v One side of Catherine's administration presents itself before us under the aspect of a problem defying all solution : this is her financial policy. What the finances of Russia were at her acces sion she has said in a private journal, of which, unfortunately, a fragment only has been pre served : — ' I found the army stationed in Prussia without HOME POLICY 95 pay for the past eight months ; in the Treasury 1 7 millions of roubles of unpaid bonds ; a mone tary circulation of ioo millions of roubles, of which 40 millions were taken in kind abroad ; almost all the branches of commerce monopo lised by private individuals ; the excise revenue farmed out for two millions ; a loan of two millions attempted in Holland by the Empress Elizabeth, but without success ; no credit and no confidence abroad ; at home, the peasants in revolt everywhere, and, in certain districts, the proprietors themselves ready to imitate their example.' This was the result of the rdgime that Peter I. had found in force, and had not attempted to modify, which came from a conglomeration of ideas and traditions, the direct heritage of the Tartar domination, and of the Eastern habit which was summed up, not so much in the squandering, as in the pillage of all the econo mical resources of the country, and which we have thus characterised, a few years since, in a study of the financial aspect of the great empire — ' Everything that could be taxed was taxed, even to the long beards of the moiijiki, who found themselves obliged to pay toll at the gates of the towns ! To bring in the taxes, those in 96 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA power resorted to fire and steel, to military warrants, and to ingenuities of torture recom mended by the experience of centuries. The treasury still remaining empty, the revenues were farmed out, sold, and put up for lottery. Finally, in despair, the whole was taken for the part, the object taxed for the tax, and in 1729 there was established an "office of confiscated goods." ' What does Catherine do with this state of things? She begins by trying to palliafe.it. She puts the resources of her private purse at the disposition of the state. Then she endeavours to amend the organisation, of the public treasury. The capital vice of this organisation is the lack of unity : the finances of the empire are in the hands of different institutions, independent one of another, each acting in a different direction, each seeing which can make the most out of the other. Catherine attempts a unification and a centralisation of these services. Isolated reforms, the suppression of monopolies and indivisible privileges in a certain number of commercial societies, the cancelling of the farming out of the excises, furnish a supplement of receipts. , But the sum-total of the revenue remains very low : it is not more than 1 7 millions of roubles (about HOME POLICY 97 85 millions of francs). Now the question is how to make it even with the new demands of the imperial policy, which would be on a level with that of the great European powers, that of France, which has a budget of five hundred millions of francs, of England, which has one of twelve million pounds. More than this, Cathe rine desires to eclipse her rivals in the West. By her innumerable enterprises at home, by the pageantry of her court, by her largesses to a whole crowd of adulators, with which Europe is soon filled, by the gold which she showers on her favourites, she desires to efface the memory of the great king, the Roi Soleil, whose dazzling memory haunts her imagination. And she well-nigh succeeds ! The first Turkish war costs 47^ millions of roubles. And, after a few years' respite, she follows up again her great enterprises abroad with the annexation of the Crimea, the second Turkish war, the war with Sweden, the conquest of Poland, the expedition to Persia, etc. At home the outlay is not less. Favouritism costs in thirty-four years about 50 millions of roubles. The maintenance of the court, with its disorder and extravagance, re quires enormous sums. From 1762 to 1768 the keeping up of the palace of Peterhof alone is vol. 11. G CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA debited to the state in 180,000 roubles (900,000 francs), and when the Empress arrives there in June 1768 she finds everything in absolute dila pidation. The money has all gone elsewhere. In 1796 it is with a budget of about 80 millions of roubles that Catherine has to meet her liabilities. And meet them she does. From one end of her reign to the other she supplies for all. She pays for everybody and for everything : the apprenticeship of Alexis Orlof on the fleet in the Archipelago, the follies of Patiomkine, and the enthusiasm of Voltaire. She lets the gold slip through her fingers, and she is never in want, or never seems to be in want. How ? by what miracle ? The explanation is easy to give ; but, to understand that explanation, it is needful to penetrate a secret, of which Catherine had (and this was her merit and her great source of strength), if not the profound knowledge, at all events the intuition of genius. In all their struggles with the finances of the empire, it is strange that the governments of the empire never thought, at one time or another, of an expedient which, disastrous as its practice had been in the West, still tempted the fancy. On arriving at power Peter III. did, in fact, decree the founda tion of a bank, and the issue of bank-notes for HOME POLICY 99 the sum of 5 millions of roubles. The idea of the Emperor did not at first attract the Empress. The paper currency, whose workings she did not exactly understand, did not seem of much use. But, in 1769, the exigencies of the Turkish war overcame her repugnances and scruples, and, from that time, the instrument of her financial power, the magic power which, from 1769 to 1796, sustained the fortune and the fame of the great sovereign, fed the colossal and ever-renewed effort of her reign, and made up for all her prodigalities, was born. In twenty-seven years Catherine issued 137,700,000 roubles'-worth of paper money. Adding 47,739,130 roubles on the one part, and 82,457,426 roubles on the other, for the proceeds of home or foreign loans contracted at the same period, we arrive at a total of 264,665,556 roubles, or more than a milliard of francs, raised on the public credit. That is how Catherine paid. VI There is not much to be said respecting the army in the reign of Catherine. Her reign was warlike; it countenanced neither militarism nor the military spirit. The military spirit lives on CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA discipline, respect for the powers that be, and also ambition. In making Alexis Orlof an admiral and Patiomkine a general in chief, Catherine by no means cultivated these sentiments. In 1772, at the congress of Fokchany, Gregory Orlof, who had never seen a battlefield, assumed the tone of a superior in speaking to Roumiantsof, the con queror of Kagoul, and was near taking the com mand in partnership with him. But Roumiantsof only changed rivals. A few years later, he had to retire before a new favourite. When it was no longer commanded by Roumiantsof, and not yet by Souvarof, the army was in general very ill commanded. But the soldier was then as he has since been, as he recently was under the walls of Plewna, and he had before him only the Turks, who were put hors de combat, so to speak, before the combat began, by the European tactics ; or else the Poles, who, like the Turks, were, in point of view of the art of war, two centuries behind the time. Catherine was careful to avoid fighting with the disciplined troops of the West. When she went against the Swedes, who were never theless a poor adversary for Russia, she had cause to repent of it. Besides, she conquered cheaply, as Prince Henry of Prussia said. Doubt less, however, her indomitable energy and her HOME POLICY audacity contributed to bring victory to her side. Competent judges have accused her of having, in all that concerns the military administration, spoilt the work of Peter the Great. In 1763 she sanctioned a reform which put the regiments entirely into the hands of their colonels. Peter had confided the cares of administration to in spectors, employed by a general commissariat, though a commissariat very much centralised. The abandonment of this organisation gave rise to numerous abuses. According to the Comte de Segur, the Russian army amounted, in 1785, to a fighting force of about five hundred and thirty thousand men, of whom two hundred and thirty thousand were the regular troops. Segur observed, nevertheless, that the disorder which reigned in the War Office made it impossible to get at the exact figures, and that the official numeration was a little dubious. He added : ' Many colonels have confessed to me that they made from 3000 to 4000 roubles annually out of their infantry regiments, and that those of cavalry brought in 18,000 to their chiefs.' The Comte de Vergennes wrote at the same time : ' The Russian fleets were far from gaining fame by leaving the Baltic. The one which was last CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA seen in the Mediterranean has not left a good reputation. Leghorn complains particularly of the officers, who have bought much and paid for little.' To sum up, Catherine attempted and began many things ; she achieved hardly any. It was in her nature to go forward without looking1- at what she left behind her. She left many ruins. ' Before the death of Catherine,' some one has said, ' the greater part of the monuments of her reign were already in ddbris.' There was a demon in her which drove her forward, ever forward, beyond the present hour and the result already attained, without leaving her even the satisfaction of a moment's pause to contemplate the finished work. This demon was perhaps only that of ambition, and of an ambition sometimes poor and trivial. When she had settled the plans and laid the foundations of an edifice, she had a medal struck, and, the medal once struck and out awav in her cabinet/ she thought no more of what was to be built. ' The famous marble church, begun in 1780, was still only begun twenty years after. But perhaps this was the part allotted by Pro vidence to the Czarina, and was it not hers also to carry with her on this headlong course a people HOME POLICY 103 whom Peter I. had not succeeded in shaking entirely out of its sleep of ages— a sleeping giant under a shroud of snow — and who needed only to be drawn out of this torpor in order to follow the natural course, a torrentjthat nothing can inter cept, towardsa mysterious destiny ) And perhaps also Catherine was not entirely at fault when she wrote to Grimm, the day after the day on which was unveiled the monument which she had erected to the great Czar, her predecessor — ' Peter I., seen in the open air, seemed to me to look quite brisk as well as imposing; one would have said he was pleased with the work. For some time I could not look at him fixedly ; I felt moved, and when I looked around me I saw that all had tears in their eyes. The face was turned away from the Black Sea, but the pose of his head seemed to say that he could see well enough either way. He was too far away to speak to me, but he seemed to me to have an air of satisfaction, which communicated itself to me, and encouraged me to try to do yet better in the future, if I can.' CHAPTER III FOREIGN POLICY I The famous German historian Sybel wrote in 1869: 'No burning question arises in Germany in our days without our finding some trace of the policy of Catherine II.' This observation might well be generalised and applied to the greater part of Europe. Very ambitious, very feminine, sometimes almost childish, the foreign policy of Catherine was one of universal expansion. The opening of her reign seemed nevertheless to intimate something quite different. On coming to the throne, the Empress an nounced herself as a peaceful sovereign, disposed to remain quietly at home if she were not inter fered with, desirous, in consequence, of avoiding all conflict with her neighbours, and determined to employ all her activity in the home govern ment of an empire which offered a sufficient field for her spirit of enterprise. This programme corresponded, even from the point of view of 104 FOREIGN POLICY 105 international relations, with an ambition which abdicated none of its rights, but which was governed by the most generous inspirations. Writing to Count Kayserling, her ambassador at Warsaw, Catherine wrote : ' I tell you, in a word, that my aim is to be joined in the bonds of friend ship with all the powers, in armed alliance, so that I may always be able to range myself on the side of the oppressed, and in this way become the arbiter of Europe.' She was not as yet, it is evident, thinking of the spoliation of Poland. She rejected the very idea of conquest. Courland itself did not tempt her. ' I have people enough to render happy,' she said, ' and this little corner of the earth will add nothing to my comfort' She thought to confirm the treaty of perpetual peace with Turkey. She reduced the fighting force of her army. She was in no haste to fill the vacancies made in her arsenals by the ruinous wars of the preceding reigns. She repeated that it was needful, before all things, to set the country in order and repair the finances. How did she come to abandon so soon and so entirely this initial point of view ? We can cite in this respect a most valuable piece of evidence. The man to whom we owe it is one of those who 106 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA are the honour of their country, and the frankness of his language is calculated to throw light on this obscure side of Catherine's history ; it seems also to indicate that certain sentiments, to-day ignored or discredited in Russia, were not always foreign to noble minds. Some years after the death of Catherine, in a letter addressed to Alexander I., who had just assumed the throne, Count Simon Vorontsof wrote as follows : — 'The late Empress desired peace and desired it to last. . . . Everything was calculated to con firm it. ... It is Prussia . . . that induced Count Panine to revoke the ameliorations which had been introduced into the constitution of Poland in order to gain possession of the country with more facility. It is Prussia who persuaded this same minister to insist that all the Polish dissi dents should be admitted to all the posts of state, which was impossible without employing violence against the Poles. It was employed, and it was this which formed the confederations, the number of which was carefully concealed from the Empress. Bishops and senators were arrested in full diet and exiled to Russia. Our troops entered Poland, ravaged everything, pursued the confederates into the Turkish provinces, and this violation of territory caused the Turks to declare FOREIGN POLICY 107 war against us. ... It is from the time of this war that we must date the foreign debts, and the creation of paper money at home, two calamities which are the misery of Russia.' Thus it was Prussia which, in order to gain the assistance of Russia in its Polish policy, drew Catherine into a career of violent and violating enterprises of all kinds in which she found herself caught as in a wheel. This course, nevertheless, was, we incline to believe, inevitable for her in one way or another. Quite apart from Prussia, Catherine had from the first too lofty a notion of her power not to be tempted, one day or another, to make use of it, and too lofty a conception of the part she had to play, not to brush aside any sort of scruples. In October 1762, the court of Denmark having proposed to her to renounce the guardianship of her son, in respect of the Duchy of Holstein, she replied in these characteristic terms — ' The case is perhaps unique that a sovereign empress should be guardian in a fief of empire for her son, but it is stranger still that a woman, who has five hundred thousand men ready to do battle for her ward, should be told that she ought not to be concerned with a Schvverdt (sic) which can hardly maintain three hundred men.' 108 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA It is nevertheless probable, if not certain, that in entering upon the course which was to lead her so far from her first projects of collected and peaceful labour, Catherine did not realise whither she was going, nor that the current was bearing her along, that her first successes had intoxicated her, and that she was thus hurried forward, in her own despite, into a state of war-fever, which rose at times almost to madness, and in which she lost all count of the means at her disposal, and of every consideration of prudence, or, alas ! of equity. The Marquis de Virac wrote to the Comte de Vergennes in 1782 : ' Here they snatch at everything, greedily and unthinkingly, which seems likely to add a new glory to the reign of Catherine II. They do not trouble to count the cost ; the first thing is to be moving.' To be moving, no matter how, no matter where, to make a great racket, no matter at what cost, such, in effect, seemed to be the constant concern of Catherine from the time of the first Turkish war onward. Helped by her ' luck,' she reposed on the belief that something for her greater fame and the greater grandeur of her empire would come out of everything. 'The good fortune which crowns all the enterprises of the Russians,' writes the Comte de Vergennes in FOREIGN POLICY 109 1 784, ' wraps them, so to speak in a radiant atmosphere, through which they see nothing.' As for political system or general idea at the back of her enterprises, do not ask the Empress for anything of the sort. She will answer : 'Cirumstances, conjunctures, and conjectures.' As for conciliating these enterprises with a higher law of morals, of humanity, or of international right, she has no thought of such a thing. ' It is as useless to speak to her of Puffendorf or of Grotius,' writes the English envoy Macartney from St. Petersburg in 1770, 'as if one spoke of Clarke or Tillotson at Constantinople.' Catherine, moreover, inaugurates, in the conduct of foreign affairs, a rule of personal initiative, which itself cannot but give to them an adven turous turn, for she flings herself into it with her nervous and excitable woman's temperament. She expends, especially at the outset, an extra ordinary activity. She dictates herself all the diplomatic correspondence. She soon finds out, it is true, that she cannot manage it all, and that the service suffers by it. She then reserves to herself the most important matters, leaving to the minister, that is to say, to Count Panine, the bulk of the work. She writes on April 1, 1763, to Count Kayserling : ' In future I hope secrecy CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA will be better kept, for I do not choose to take any one into my confidence in regard to what is in the air.' Her predecessors had only short extracts communicated to them from the de spatches of her foreign ambassadors. She insists on seeing the originals ; she reads and annotates them. These annotations are curious. On the margin of a despatch from Prince Galitzine, her ambassador at Vienna, informing her that the courts of Vienna and of Versailles are inciting the Porte to meddle in the affairs of Poland, she writes : 'He does not keep his eyes open, for he does not know even what the street children know, or else he says less than he knows.' Prince Repnine, writing from Warsaw, that in the course of a conversation with the Prussian ambassador, Baron Goltz, the latter has recog nised that the orders of the King, his master, do not seem to him in the interests of his subjects, though they are perhaps in those of the sove reign, she annotates : ' Is there then any other glory than the good of the subject. These are oddities beyond my pale.' In 1780, on the first visit that he makes to the sovereign, Joseph II. is informed of this method of work, and is amazed at it. Up to the time of this meeting, however, which played a decisive part in the history of FOREIGN POLICY Catherine, the influence of Panine, as head of the department of foreign affairs, had been very great. It is this influence which, in spite of wind and tide, in spite even of the personal re pugnance of the Empress, had kept her policy in touch with the Prussian alliance. The visit of Joseph brings about a sudden change. Catherine promptly brushes her minister aside in order to form, on her own account, the new alliance which opens new horizons before her on the side of the North Sea. And soon Panine is quite out of the reckoning. A mere clerk, obedient in carrying out the inspirations of the imperial mind, will suffice. One is soon found, excellent for the purpose, Bezborodko. ' Properly speaking, the Empress has no longer a minister,' writes the Marquis de Verac in September 1781. This personal policy, superior as are the qualities of mind and temper of which Catherine gives proof, is not slow to subject her to numer ous failures. There are infatuations, followed by disenchantments equally arbitrary. Fancy has full play, and the woman is too often seen in the place of the sovereign. It is a woman, and an angry woman, who from the 4th to the 9th of July 1796 draws up for Count Budberg, Russian minister at Stockholm, a communication intended CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA to take the King of Sweden to task for thinking of coming to St. Petersburg without entering into an engagement beforehand to marry the grand-daughter of the Empress. Let him stay at home, then, this ill-bred prince ! She is tired of all the crotchets that cloud his brain. When one means to do anything, one does not make difficulties at every step. The document, an official document which has to pass through the chancellor's office, is all in this tone. But can it be called a diplomatic communication ? One would say rather, a confidential letter to an in timate friend, on whom one pours out all one's wrath and impatience, simply and solely to ease one's nerves. And to make the resemblance complete, there is a postscript. There are even four, each of which says something different, and indeed precisely opposite, to what has just been said by the last ; the whole summed up by agreeing, unconditionally and without reserve, to the visit which had been so vigorously objected to at the outset. At times Catherine realises the action of her temperament on her state policy, and the unbalanced elements that this influence brings into it. A propos of her declaration of armed neutrality, issued April 28, 1780, she writes to FOREIGN FOLIC Y j , 3 Grimm : ' You will say that it is volcanic, but there was no means of doing otherwise.' She adds a reflection which we have already found her making, and which seems to intimate that she has not forgotten her German origin, but still desires to make what capital out of it she can : ' Denn die Teutschen,' she says, ' hassen nicht so als wenn die Leute ihnen auf die Nase spielen wollen ; das liebte der Herr Wagner auch nicht! But this is only a way of putting things, or, at the most, a proof that she sometimes mis judges the transformation which has taken place in her, and which links her to her adopted country by the deepest fibres of her being ; for her foreign and home policy alike are essentially Russian, as is her mode of thinking and feeling, indeed her whole nature. Russian, and not German, are the personal elements of success that she puts at the disposal of her ambition, as are also the defects which hinder their free course. For there is nothing German in this way of rushing forward with one's eyes shut, or dreaming with one's eyes open, which is peculiar to her, this way of leaving reflection and calculation out of the question. It may be said that her success is due to qualities the most VOL. II. H ii4 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA precisely opposed to the German temperament. A cold and calculating German would never have undertaken the first Turkish war. ' The army,' writes Count Simon Vorontsof, ' was re duced, imperfect, and scattered all over the empire. It had to march in the depth of winter against the Turkish frontier, and the cannons, mortars, bombs, and explosives had to be sent with the greatest possible speed from the arsenal at St. Petersburg to Kief.' When the second Turkish war and the Swedish war broke out, it was worse still. In 1783 the rupture with the Porte being imminent, a regiment of dragoons, which should have consisted of 1200 to 1500 men, was summoned from Esthonia. Only 700 men were to be found, with 300 horses, and not a single saddle. Catherine was by no means daunted. She had the faith which scorns ob stacles, and will not admit impossibilities. This faith, which removes mountains, and sets cannons travelling from one end to the other of an empire some thousand miles in length, is not a German quality. Meanwhile, in the domain of foreign politics, Catherine accomplished great things with means which the constant illusion in which she lived doubled or tripled in her eyes, but which were FOREIGN POLICY "5 really most moderate. She supplied their lack by her moral force, which was immense. From the point of view of the administration of the department of foreign affairs, she brought a distinct progress to Russia. Nothing daunted by the labour of which Frederick alone among contemporary sovereigns showed himself careful and capable, and adding to it the authority that she always carried with her, she gave to the administration of this department a unity of direction that it had never yet had. At the same time she insisted on habits of probity and professional dignity quite alien to the modes of a not very distant past. In June 1793 the English ambassador Buckingham, urging upon the chancellor Vorontsof the conclusion of a treaty of commerce, thought it quite natural to supplement his demand by the offer of a personal gratuity of ,£2000. But Vorontsof at once re plied : ' I leave it to those who are well versed in these shameful traffickings to decide whether 2000 or 200,000 pieces would balance the sale of my sovereign's interests.' Bestoujef, the chancellor of Elizabeth, did not speak this language. BOOK III THE FRIEND OF THE PHILOSOPHERS CHAPTER I LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES I Count Hordt, a Swede, serving in the Prussian army, has left some interesting notes on his visit to St. Petersburg. The first five months of it were spent in prison. This was under the reign of Elizabeth. Peter, on coming to the throne, liberated the prisoner and invited him to dinner. 'Were you well treated in your captivity?' asked the Emperor. ' Don't be afraid to tell me.' ' Very ill-treated,' replied the Swede. ' I had not even any books.' At that a voice was heard, saying loudly : ' That was barbarous indeed.' It was the voice of Catherine. We shall endeavour to show what were the relations, so often commented upon, but still so LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 117 little really known, between the Empress and those who were the main instruments of her European fame. Voltaire and his rivals in the honour and adulation of the ' Semiramis of the North ' demand a separate study. We shall here concern ourselves with Catherine alone. She loved books, as she has abundantly proved. Her purchase of Diderot's library is well known. Dorat has celebrated this ac quisition in an epistle in verse which figures in the edition of his CEuvres Choisis, embellished with a vignette in which are seen little Loves dressed in furs and travelling in sledges. Diderot asked 15,000 francs for his treasure. The Empress offered him 16,000, on condition that the great writer should remain in posses sion to the time of his death. Diderot thus became, without leaving Paris, librarian of Catherine the Great in his own library. For this he had a pension of 1000 francs a year. It was to commence in 1765. The following year the pension was not paid. This was then the common lot of pensions and pensioners, not only in Russia. On hearing of it from Betzky, Catherine wrote through him to her librarian that she did not wish ' the negligence of an official to cause any disturbance to her library, and, for this reason, 1 1 8 CA THERINE II. OF R US SIA she would send to M. Diderot for fifty years in advance the amount destined to the maintenance and increase of her books, and at the expiration of that period, she would take further measures.' A bill of exchange for 25,000 francs accompanied the letter. One can imagine the transports of enthusiasm in the philosophic camp. Later on, the library of Voltaire joined that of Diderot in the Hermi tage collection. It was Grimm who, after the death of the patriarch of Ferney, arranged with Madame Denis for this new acquisition. The conditions were, ' a certain sum ' at the discretion of the Empress, and a statue of Voltaire which she would place in one of the rooms of her palace. Madame Denis relied on the generosity of Catherine, so much belauded by the illustrious dead and by his friends, and Catherine was re solved, as Grimm expresses it, ' to avenge the ashes of the greatest of philosophers from the insults that he had received in his own country.' The great man's relatives, his grand-nephews particularly, MM. Mignot and d'Hornoy, pro tested against the transaction, which, they con sidered, infringed upon their rights and upon those of France. M. d'Hornoy even attempted to procure an official intervention. But the LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES ng Empress held to her bargain. Voltaire's books now form part of the Imperial Library, to which they have been removed from the palace of the Hermitage. A special room is assigned to them. In the middle is the statue of Houdon, a replica, from the hand of the master, of the one in the foyer of the Comedie Francaise at Paris. There are about 7000 volumes, the greater part half- bound in red morocco. Every volume contains annotations in Voltaire's handwriting. One need not be a Frenchman to feel, on entering this room, the indefinable sensation caused by the sight of things which are not in their proper place. These relics, the monument of one of the greatest glories of France, should assuredly not be here. These were not, however, the largest part of the additions to the imposing collection of printed books and manuscripts with which Catherine endowed Russia. The king Stanislas Ponia towski was, we know, a cultivated man. On arriving at the throne, he endeavoured to satisfy his tastes and to share them with his fellow- citizens. The capital of Poland profited by this. It had already a considerable library, founded in 1745 by two brothers, who were distinguished savans and good citizens, the Zaluskis. Ponia- CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA towski enlarged it. On taking possession of Warsaw, Catherine transported the king to St. Petersburg, and the library along with him. Having no longer any political independence, the Poles were supposed to have no longer any need of books. Thus Catherine loved books : did she equally love literature ? The question may seem strange. It demands an answer, nevertheless. The reign of Catherine corresponds, in the history of literary development in Russia, to a well-marked epoch. The preceding epoch, dominated by the great figure of Lomonossof, stands out clearly. It was, during the lifetime of Elizabeth and for some years after her death, a period of absorption and assimilation of foreign elements en masse. Euro pean culture entered into the national life by the door, one might say rather by the breach that Peter the Great had hewed open. A period of reaction and of struggle followed. The national genius, submerged, trampled upon, oppressed, revolted and demanded back its rights. It came finally to treat foreign litera ture and science as enemies. The poet Dier- javine, and the satirical journalist and thinker Novikof, were the heroes of this campaign of liberation. What part was played in this crisis LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 121 by Catherine ? We know what she did with Novikof : she broke his pen and his life ; fifteen years of imprisonment were the last reward that she gave to his labours. She treated Dierjavine worse still : she made him a tchinovnik and an abject courtier. For all this there is a reason. Catherine's was an intelligence specially, and, so to speak, solely organised for politics and the government of men. She is a little German princess, who, at the age of fourteen, comes to Russia with the idea that she will be one day the absolute mis tress of this immense empire, and who has con scientiously applied herself to prepare for the part she will have to play, a part, judging by the examples before her, which has nothing in common with that of a literary Mecaenas. Consequently, all her ideas, all her tastes, are subordinated to this definite conception of her destiny, and of the rights and duties resulting from it. What she appreciates in Voltaire, when the fame and the books of Voltaire reach her, is not the charm of style — does she even know what style is ? — but the support that the prose, good or bad, of the author, his poetry, melodious and full of senti ment, or dry and hard to the ear, might afford to the development of the programme of govern- CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA ment that she has vaguely mapped out in her mind. She has no sense of harmony, and, beyond her family relations and her love-episodes, she pays little heed to sentiment. At one moment, at the beginning of her reign, influenced a little by her reading and a great deal by her friend of some years' standing, Princess Dachkof, she is wishful to take part in the artistic, scientific, and literary movement which she perceives about her. She flings herself into the melde with the ardour she puts into everything. She becomes a writer. She becomes a journalist. But we know already the lamentable shipwreck of her liberal ideas. And what happens to her ideas happens also to her tastes. All the love she may have ever had for letters founders in this disaster, which even the glory of Voltaire does not survive. But let us first look at her tastes. Voltaire apart, French literature, the only literature with which she is familiar up to a late period of her life, is far from attracting her as a whole. She makes her selection, and what she selects are the works of Le Sage, and those of Moliere and Corneille. After studying Voltaire, she has en joyed Rabelais, and even Scarron. But she has gone back upon her tastes in this direction, only remembering them with a sort of shame that she LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 123 has ever had them. As for Racine, she simply does not understand him. He is too literary for her. Literature with him is art for art's sake, and art for art's sake, to Catherine, is nonsense. When she applies herself to the task of writing comedies and tragedies, she does not for an instant dream of making a work of art : what she does is criticism, satire, and, above all, politics. She attacks the prejudices and vices that, she perceives in the morals of the country, the ideas, and even the men, that offend her. She makes war upon the Martinists, and occa sionally upon the King of Sweden. Literature, to her, is merely a branch of her military and repressive powers. Rhetoric, for her, does not exist : she replaces it by logic and her authority as samodierjitsa, ruler of forty millions of men. She, nevertheless, makes a solitary choice in the work of Racine : she likes Mithridate. One sees why. Still her disputatious instincts and her moralis ing intentions come in collision with continual obstacles in the surroundings in which she lives. The incident in connection with Sedaine is charac teristic in this respect. She had liked Sedaine for his simple gaiety, and the easy flow of his couplets, so pleasantly brought out by the music 124 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA of Philidor. This pupil of Montesquieu and of Voltaire had a taste for comic opera. In 1779 it occurred to her to utilise, after her own fashion, the talent of the witty and prolific writer. Why should he not compose, on her lines, and for her theatre at the Hermitage, a comedy which might follow up her own satirical pieces? Urged on by Grimm, encouraged by Diderot, Sedaine com poses a piece, L' Epreuve Inutile. ' Tell him,' writes Catherine immediately to Grimm, ' that if instead of one, two, or three pieces, he were to do a hundred, I would read them all with the greatest eagerness. You know that, after the Patriarch, there is no one whose writing I like so much as Sedaine's.' But Betzky, who has read the piece aloud to his august benefactress, is much less enthusiastic. He points out ' that the piece, if it were played before the court, would give umbrage to the spectators, and that the master plays a very small part in it.' Catherine at first rebukes these timid objections ; she intends to have the piece acted, ' if it were only to show that she has more credit herself than Raymond.' Betzky insists ; he considers such a tentative not merely useless, but dangerous ; and the Empress finally comes round to his point of view. She tells Sedaine that she thinks his play LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 125 ' good, very good ' ; she sends him 1 2,000 francs for his trouble, but she informs him that his masterpiece will not be acted, ' from precaution.' L'Epreuve Inutile does not even receive the honours of print. We are unaware if it was pre served in manuscript. Some years later a polemical writer of quite other range appeared on the scene, before a public at first surprised and terrified, but soon in great part won over, and doing all that could be done to atone for its first scandal by the vehemence of its present applause. Catherine ranges herself on the side of those whom the new work still continues to shock or frighten. ' If I ever write a comedy,' she says, ' I shall certainly not take the Mariage de Figaro as a model, for, after Jonathan Wild, I have never found myself in such bad company as at this celebrated marriage. It is apparently with an idea of imitating the ancients that the theatre has recurred to this taste, from which it had seemed to be purified. The expressions of Moliere were free, and bubbled up like effervescence from a natural gaiety, but his thought is never vicious, while in this popular play the undertone is con stantly unworthy, and it goes on for three hours and a half. Besides that, it is a mere web of 126 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA intrigues, in which there is a continual effort, and not a scrap of what is natural. I never laughed once all the time I was reading it.' But Catherine's business is not to play the part of a critic, it is to govern Russia, and what Russia needed at this period was assuredly not to be set in the van of European progress, intel lectual and artistic ; it was to follow, at a great distance, those who were ahead, to try to come up with them, not by a servile imitation, but doubtless by finding inspiration in them for the development of the original resources of the national genius. What did Catherine do to help on rthis event, as was her duty and even her ambition in the radiant days -when-sbe-' accepted- the title of ' the Semiramis "of the North,' and Voltaire declared that the sun seemed to have taken to shining on the world from another quarter? We hold with those who think that the best way of protecting literature that can be found by a ruler, is to leave it alone without interfering in its concerns. Such was not the opinion of Catherine. She wished to assert, in this as in all other domains, her personal initia tive and her supreme command. She professed in vain to have ' a republican soul ' ; the republic of letters . was transformed in her eyes into a LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 127 __ _ I monarchy governed by her despotic will. Did she, however, bring to light a force, a glory, or did she even aid the outcome of a new period in letters, which could balance the merit and the reputation of the writers of whom the reign of Elizabeth could legitimately boast ? We cannot see that she did. No name of the importance of Lomonossof and Soumarokof, whose fame belongs to the former reign, can be found in hers. Catherine confined herself to making the most of this heritage, always for her own personal interests, which were far from being those of art and literature. Lomonossof, now grown old, served as a sort of figure-head ; Soumarokof, with his imitations of the French dramatists, was suffi ciently good as a set-off. There was perhaps in Dierjavine the making of a great poet ; she sees nothing of it in him, and in time he ceases to see it in himself. Felitsa, the poem on which his literary reputation rests, is merely a pamphlet done to order, half panegyric, half satire. The panegyric, we need not say, is for the Empress ; the satire for the court nobles, to whom Catherine desires to read a lesson, and to whom she sends copies of the work, with the passages concerning them carefully underlined. At the end of the reign the author of Felitsa is a mere buffoon, 128 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA wallowing in the antechambers of the favourite, Plato Zoubof. The serious rivals of Lomonossof, — those who try to react against the current of foreign importation, by which Soumarokof is carried along, Kherasskof too, in his Rossiade, and Bogdanovitch, in his Douchenka, made up from the insipidities of the centuries on the subject of the loves of Psyche — Kniajnine, Von- Visine, Loukine, add some interesting plays to the national drama. Kniajnine writes the Fan- faron, a comedy which remains one of the classics of Russian literature, and, in Vadime a Nov gorod, attempts the historical drama, drawn from the fresh sources of national tradition. Von- Visine, the Russian Moliere, ridicules in his Brigadier the acquirements of Muscovite Tris- sotins, founded on the reading of French novels ; and, in his Dadais, takes off the educators of aristocratic youth, brought at great expense from abroad. But this national drama is not that of Catherine. She never visits it, until in her later years, when the whim takes her, or rather she finds it good policy, to be interested in the dramatisation of scenes taken from the history of the country. Meanwhile, literature, national or otherwise, feels itself so little under her protection, that the contributors to the Sobiessiednik, founded by the LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 129 Princess Dachkof, dare not sign their articles, even though they are aware that the Empress herself is one of their number. They are not unwise, if one may recall the fate of Prince Bielossielski, who wrote so charming an : Epistle to France,' won so flattering a reply from Voltaire on ' the laurels thrown to his compatriots and falling back upon himself,' and who, then being Minister at Turin, was recalled in disgrace, for no reason but that he was a man of wit, that he showed it in his despatches, and that he turned agreeable verse. Kniajnine, too, knew what it cost to cultivate the national drama. His Vadime a Novgorod was torn up by order of the Empress, and came near being burnt by the public executioner. An Academy, founded in 1 783 on the model of the French Academy, under the inspiration of the Princess Dachkof, is the sole monument that Russian literature owes to a sovereign to whom Russia owes so much in other respects. To this Academy was confided the mission of fixing the rules of orthography, the grammar and prosody, of the Russian language, and of encouraging the study of history. It began, one need hardly say, by undertaking a dictionary, to which Catherine herself contributed. vol. 11. 1 1 30 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA II ' Tragedy offends her, comedy bores her, she does not care for music, her cuisine is quite unstudied ; in gardens she cares only for roses ; she has, in short, no taste for anything but for building and for domineering over her court — for what she has for reigning, and figuring in the world, is a passion.' It is thus that Durand, the French chargd- d' affaires, summed up, in 1773, the intellectual position of Catherine the Great. His observation was correct, especially from the artistic point of view. Was it lack of knowledge in her, or lack of natural disposition ? It was as much the one as the other. She herself was well aware of it. In 1767, when Falconet submitted to her judg ment the design for the statue of Peter the Great, she excused herself from passing an opinion ; she understood nothing about it, and she recom mended the artist to the judgment of his own conscience and of posterity. Falconet was foolish enough to insist — ' My posterity is your Majesty. The other may come when it will.' ' Not at all,' replied Catherine. ' How can you submit yourself to my opinion ? I do not even LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 131 know how to draw. This is perhaps the first good statue I have ever seen in my life. The merest school-boy knows more about your art than I do.' We often find in her mouth, and in her writing, this parti pris of incompetence and self-abnega tion, so alien from the general tendency of her mind and temperament. She has an opera for which the best singers are sought all over Europe. She pays heavy incomes to the 'stars,' whose demands at that time were without limit. But she acknowledges that all this expense is not in the least for her own pleasure. ' In music,' she writes, ' I am no more advanced than formerly. I can recognise no tones but those of my nine dogs, who in turn share the honour of being in my room, and whose individual voices I can recognise from a distance ; the music of Galuppi and Paisiello I hear, and I am astonished at the tones that it combines, but I cannot recognise them at all.' Nevertheless, certain comic operas of Paisiello succeed in charming her. She ha's a sense and taste for the grotesque. She is enchanted by the Pulmonia, and even remembers some of the airs, which she hums over when she happens to meet the maestro. 132 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Sometimes, too, even in the domain of art, where she feels so out of place, her despotic instincts claim their rights ; and, as if by miracle, she has certain inspirations which are not without a certain savour. Here is a letter, written at the time of her first triumphs over Turkey — ' Since you speak to me of festivities in honour of the peace, listen to what I am going to say, and do not believe a word of the absurdities of the gazettes. The original project was like that of all festivities : temple of Janus, temple of Bacchus, temple of the Devil and his grand mother, stupid and intolerable allegories, because they were gigantic, and because not to have common sense was supposed to be an effort of genius. Disgusted with all these fine and mighty plans, which I positively would not have, one fine day I summon M. Bajenof, my architect, and I say to him : My friend, three versts from the city there is a meadow ; imagine that this meadow is the Black Sea ; that there are two roads leading to it from the city ; well, one of these roads shall be the Tanai's, the other the Borysthene : at the mouth of the first you will build a banqueting- hall, that you will name Azof; at the mouth of the other you will build a theatre, that you will name Kinburn ; you will trace out with sand the LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 133 peninsula of the Crimea ; you will there enclose Kertch and Ienicale\ as ball-rooms ; on the left of the Tanais you will place buffets of wine and eatables for the people ; opposite to the Crimea you will have illuminations which will represent the joy of the two empires over the re-establish ment of peace ; on the other side of the Danube you will have the fireworks, and on the land which is supposed to be the Black Sea you will place illuminated ships and boats ; you will garnish the banks of the rivers which serve as roads with landscapes, mills, trees, houses, all lit up; and there you will have z.fete without any thing imaginary in it, but perhaps as good as many others, and much more natural.' There is something, indeed, very natural and charming in this plan of a fete, but there is also a stroke of policy. There is always this in every thing that Catherine thinks and does. All her prepossessions, artistic and literary included, tend in this direction. She accumulates in her Her mitage considerable artistic collections, but she confesses that it is not for love of the things of beauty that are heaped up in the galleries and cabinets that she prepares expressly for them. One cannot delight in what one does not under stand, and she does not understand in what 134 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA consists the merit of a fine picture or of a fine statue. She admits that it is part of the glory of a great sovereign to have these things in his palace. All her famous predecessors, all the monarchs in history whose renown she envies or seeks, Louis XIV. at their head, have had them. But she hits on a word which, coming from any one but herself, would have the air of a cruel epigram, but which characterises the purchases, very extensive during the first part of her reign in particular, to which she submits in order to carry out this part of her programme of imperial magnificence. ' It is not love of art,' she says, ' it is voracity. I am not an amateur, I am a glutton.' In 1768 she buys for 180,000 roubles the famous Dresden gallery of Count Briihl, ex- Minister of the King of Poland. In 1772 she purchases, at Paris, the Crozat collection. In reference to this Diderot writes to Falconet : ' Ah, my friend Falconet, how things have changed! We sell our pictures and our statues in time of peace ; Catherine buys them in time of war. The sciences, the arts, taste, and wisdom, all make for the North, and barbarism with its attendant train comes down upon the South. I have just carried through an important affair : the acquisition of the collection of Crozat, in- LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 135 creased by his descendants, and known to-day under the name of the gallery of the Baron de Thiers. There are Raphaels, Guidos, Poussins, Van Dycks, Schidones, Carlo Lottis, Rem- brandts, Wouvermans, Teniers, etc., to the number of about eleven hundred. It has cost her Imperial Majesty 460,000 francs. That is not half its value. ' Her usual good luck accompanied Catherine in these proceedings. Three months later, fifty pictures of not greater worth were sold for 440,000 francs at the sale of the Due de Choiseul's collection. She herself paid 30,000 francs to Mme. Geoffrin for two pictures of Van Loo, La Conversation Espagnole and La Lechtre Espagnole. It is true that this is, perhaps, on her part, a way of establishing friendly relations with the in fluential matron, who gains on the bargain two- thirds of the amount. She has one misfortune, in 177 1, with the Braancamp collection, bought in Holland for 60,000 ecus, which goes down on the coast of Finland with the vessel that brings it. But, says Catherine, there is only 60,000 ecus lost. She can easily make up for the rest. She buys en bloc the engraved gems of the Due d'Orleans. Through Grimm and Diderot she sends order after order to French artists : from 136 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Chardin and Vernet she demands landscapes ; from Houdon a Diana (which has been refused admittance at the Louvre, on the ground that it is too little clothed) ; from Vien, a ceiling for the grand staircase at T_zarskoieT.£i|elo ; from the painter on enamel, De Mailly, an artistic inkstand for the room of the Order of St. George, for which he charges 36,000 francs, and which he executes very unwillingly, and only on being forced to do so by an intervention of Government. In 1778 she has copies made at Rome, by Gunterberger and Reiffenstein, of the frescoes of Raphael in the Vatican ; and she has a gallery erected at the Hermitage with panels of the same dimension to receive these copies, which, being done on canvas, have been since utilised in the reconstruction of the palace. They can still be seen there. In 1790, in sending to Grimm her portrait, ' in a fur cap,' she writes : ' Here is some thing for your museum ; mine, at the Hermitage, consists of pictures, the panels of Raphael, 38,000 books, four rooms filled with books and prints, 10,000 engraved gems, nearly 10,000 drawings, and a cabinet of natural history contained in two large rooms. All that is accompanied by a charming theatre, admirably adapted for seeing and hearing, and also as to seating accommodation, and with LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 137 no draughts. My little retreat is so situated that to go there and back from my room is just 3000 paces. There I walk about in the midst of a quantity of things that I love and delight in, and these winter walks are what keep me in health and on foot.' All that is her own doing. In accomplishing it she has had to fight with serious difficulties, for, though she may make gold at will, her power in this respect is unlimited only within the limits of her empire — outside, the paper money loses too much in change. Thus, from the year 1781 she feels obliged to use moderation. She writes to Grimm : ' I renew my resolution to buy nothing more, not a picture, nothing ; I want nothing more, and consequently I give up the Correggio of "the divine." : That is indeed a 'glutton's ' vow, as valid as a drunkard's ! A veritable conflict commences, from this moment, in the mind of Catherine, between her desires as a collector, now a passion with her, and her forced instincts of economy. It is not the latter that most generally win the day. The letter to Grimm that we have just cited is dated March 29 ; on the 14th of April we find in the correspondence of the Empress with her art-purveyor this passage : 'If "the divine" [Reiffenstein] would send her, 138 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA direct to St. Petersburg, some very very fine old cameos, in one, two, or three colours, in perfect state and keeping, we should be infinitely obliged to those who would procure them for us. That is not to be called a purchase, but what is one to do? ' And on the 23rd she writes : ' Now, you may say what you like, you may rail at me as you please, but I must have two copies of coloured prints, according to the list I am going to give you ... for we are gluttons, and so gluttonous for everything of that kind, that there is no longer a house in St. Petersburg where one can decently live if it does not contain something faintly resembling the panels, the Eternal Father or the whole string that I have enumerated.' ' Lord, one would say that the good resolutions of Thine anointed are wavering ! ' observes Grimm maliciously in his reply. He has his doubts, too, as to what has provoked this return of 'gluttony.' In using the collective pronoun ' us,' Catherine does not use the plural instead of the singular by a mere trick of speech. The ' gluttons ' of whom she speaks are indeed two at present. After the favourite Korssakof, who was a mere boor, has, come, since the end of 1780, the handsome Lanskoi', who is a man of education and refined tastes. And the handsome Lanskoi LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 139 has a real passion for prints and cameos. In July 1 78 1, sending Grimm new orders for purchases, Catherine explains that these are not for her, 'but for gluttons who have become gluttons through knowing me.' The money is certainly hers, that is to say, Russia's. In 1784 she renews her resolution of buying nothing more, 'being poor as church mice.' But Lanskoi sends 50,000 francs to Grimm 'for the purchase of a cabinet of pictures,' and promises a further amount shortly. This new course of things goes on for some time. In 1784, it is true, there is a momentary pause : Catherine will have no more cameos, nor anything of the kind. Lanskoi' is dead, and with him is dead also the taste for things which, as she frankly confesses, she does not understand a bit. But in April 1785 it begins again. What has happened ? Mamonof has taken the place of Lanskoi, and with the place he seems to have inherited the artistic • tastes of the deceased. It is not till 1794 that this intermittent fever comes finally to an end. 'I shall not buy anything more,' says Catherine, on January 13. 'I must pay my debts and save up money ; so refuse all the bargains that are offered you.' It is Plato Zoubof who reigns now, and Zoubof cares for nothing engraved save the Ho CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA gold circles bearing the effigy of his imperial mistress. Up to now the Empress has not merely been increasing her collections ; she has also been building. We should say, she has especially been building. And this time the pleasure has all been her own, as Durand intimated in 1773. We have seen what the Prince de Ligne thought of the sovereign's taste and knowledge in regard to architecture. But in default of judgment and sense of proportion she has at least plenty of spirit. She replaces artistic sense by enthusiasm, and quality by quantity. 'You know,' she writes in 1779, 'that the mania of building is stronger with us than ever, and no earthquake ever demolished so many buildings as we have set up.' She adds in German these sad re flections : ' The mania of building is an infernal thing ; it runs away with money, and the more one builds, the more one wants to build ; it is a disease, like drunkenness.' At this moment she sends to Rome for two architects — Giacomo Trombara and Geronino Quarenghi. She thus explains her choice : ' I want Italians because our Frenchmen know too much, and make horrid houses, inside and out, because they know too much.' Always the same LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 141 contempt for care, the same penchant for impro visation ! She nevertheless frequently consults the learned Clerisseau, who sends her plans of palaces in the Roman style. Perronnet furnishes her with the scheme of a bridge over the Neva ; Bourgeois de Chateaublanc, another of a light house for the shores of the Baltic. In 1765 she demands of Vasse a design for an audience- chamber 1 20 feet long and 62 high. With all that, does she give good cause to artists, whether architects, painters, or solictors, to praise her treatment of them ? Let us not ask Falconet, on his return from St. Petersburg ; his reply would be too bitter. We shall have to speak elsewhere of the visit to the capital of the North of the man to whom the city of Peter the Great and of Catherine owes to this very moment its finest ornament. We shall try also to show what were his relations with the sovereign, beginning, on her part, with more than courtesy, and ending with more than indifference. Let us say here that, not having the least comprehension of artistic things, Catherine could not in any way be likely to understand the soul of an artist. Falconet pleased her at first by his original and somewhat paradoxical turn of mind, still more perhaps by the oddities of his disposition ; she soon grew 142 CA THERINE II. OF RUSSIA tired, and finally impatient of him. He was too much of an artist for her liking. She had always her own way of interpreting the part to be played in the world by the men of talent whom she wished to employ in improving her capital. She frankly confesses it in one of her letters to Grimm : ' Si il signor marchese del Grimmo volio mi fare [sic] a pleasure, he will have the goodness to write to the divine Reif fenstein to look me out two good architects, Italians by birth and skilled in their profession, whom he will engage in the service of her Imperial Majesty of Russia for so many years, and whom he will send from Rome to St. Petersburg like a bundle of tools.' Tools — it is just that ; tools that one uses, and then throws away when they are done with, or one finds better and handier ones at hand. It was thus that she did with Falconet. She gives this further piece of advice to Grimm : ' He will choose honest and reasonable people, not dreamers like Falconet ; people who walk on the earth, not in the air.' She will have nothing aspiring. A Michael Angelo,' it has been justly said, ' would never have remained three weeks at the court of Catherine.' To remain there nearly twelve years, required in Falconet an extra ordinary power of resistance, and a veritable LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 143 passion for the work he had begun, into which he had put all his soul. But when at last he went, he was broken down. Apart from him, Catherine did not keep by her any foreign artists who were not mediocrities : Brompton, an English painter, a pupil of Mengs, and Koenig, a German sculp tor. Brompton paints allegories which delight the sovereign, for they are political allegories. ' He has painted my two grandsons, and it is a charming picture : the elder amuses himself by cutting the Gordian knot, and the other has proudly put the flag of Constantine about his shoulders.' Koenig does a bust of Patiomkine. Mme. Vigee-Lebrun, arriving at St. Petersburg in 1795 with an achieved reputation, meets with a flattering reception everywhere but at the court — Catherine finds little pleasure in her society, and considers her pictures so bad ' that one must have a very distorted sense of things to paint like that.' And the Russian artists — what does she do in this respect? Does she try to discover native talent, to encourage it, and bring it to the front ? The list of national glories, contemporaneous with her reign, is easy to establish in this sphere. There is Scorodoumof, an engraver, who had studied art in France, and whom she sent for at 144 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Paris in 1782, in order to take him into her service ; and whom a traveller, Fortia de Piles, found, a few years later, in an empty studio, engaged in polishing a copper plate for a wretched design done to order : he explained that there was not a workman in St. Petersburg capable of doing this kind of work ; was astonished that a stranger took any interest in what he was doing ; was quite resigned to the low uses of his pro fession. There is Choubine, a sculptor, dis covered by the same visitor in a narrow room, without models, without pupils, with only one order, a bust, for which an admiral has offered him 100 roubles, the marble itself costing 80 roubles, which he has to take out of the price. There is, lastly, the painter Lossienko. Here is what Falconet says of him : ' The poor fellow, starving and in the depths of misery, wishing to live anywhere but at St. Petersburg, came and told me all his troubles ; then, sinking into drunk enness in his despair, he little knew what he would gain by dying : we read on his tombstone that he was a great man ! ' The glory of Catherine wanted one great man the more, and she had him cheaply. The artist once dead, she willingly added his apotheosis to all her grandeurs. She had not taken any LITERARY AND ARTISTIC TASTES 145 pains to keep him alive. All her artistic ideas reduce themselves, in the last resort, to a question of show. And, for this object, the ' divine ' Reiffenstein, whose name is known all over Europe, is obviously worth more than the poor Lossienko, though he was no more than a good copyist. National art, in short, owes to Catherine some models furnished by her to the study and emulation of Russian artists. Beyond that, she did not give it so much as a morsel of bread. vol. il. K CHAPTER II CATHERINE AS A WRITER Durand certainly made a mistake in his reckon ing when giving his list of the things in which Catherine took pleasure. He forgot one at least of her favourite pastimes : she liked to write. We do not believe there was anything she liked so much. It was not only a taste in her — it was in some sort a necessity, almost a physical neces sity. It seems that the mere fact of holding a pen in her hand, and having before her a white sheet of paper, on which she can set her fancy roving, gives her a pleasant sensation, not only mental, but like a thrill of physical delight. She says herself, in one of her letters to Grimm, that the sight of a new pen makes her fingers itch. She never dictates. ' I do not know how to dictate,' she says. All that she writes is written with her own hand, and what does she not write ? Besides her political correspondence, which is very active, and her private correspondence, 146 CATHERINE AS A WRITER 147 which, with the enormous budgets sent regularly to Grimm, attains huge proportions ; besides her work in regard to signatures, to reports sent in to her, which she covers with marginal notes, to her dramatic and other compositions, she writes much and often for herself, for her own satisfac tion, sometimes for no apparent reason, unless for that of calming that itching of the fingers. She makes extracts from old chronicles relating to the life and glorious actions of St. Sergius, in which we cannot imagine that she has any particular interest. She works at copying the old church Sclavonic, an acquaintance with which would not seem to be indispensable to her duties as Orthodox sovereign. She cannot read a book without covering the margins with her great scrawling writing. She draws up plans for fites and pro grammes for concerts. Contrary to that statesman of our days who could only think when he was talking, one might say of her that she could only think when writing. So, like the other with his words, she was carried away by what she wrote. Her pen ran away with her thought, and sent it astray. She was well aware of it herself. She wrote to Grimm — ' I was going to say that I would write for you, so much in the scribbling mood am I ; but I 148 CATHERINE II OF RUSSIA recollect that I am here and you in Paris. I advise you to dictate, for I have been advised a hundred times to do so myself : happy is the man who can do so ; for my part, it would be impossible to talk nonsense with the pen of an other. . . . If I said to this other what flows from my pen, he would often not write what I said.' How does she find the time to write all that she writes ? She rises at six o'clock in the morning to chat at her ease with her confidant, pen in hand. Despite these laborious habits, the question remains for us an enigma. On May 7, 1767, the Empress, on a voyage of inspection, finds, herself on the Volga in ' frightful ' weather. She takes the opportunity to write a long letter to Marmontel, who has just sent her his Bdlisaire. It is miraculous. Note that, thinking and writing being the same thing to her, and her inaptitude to precede the manual labour of putting things down by the intellectual labour of putting them together being complete, she goes over and over again anything to which she attaches much importance. We have thus two rough drafts of a letter addressed by her in 1768 to the Aca demy of Berlin, which had offered her the title of honorary member. She sometimes makes more, for she does not like erasures. If the CATHERINE AS A WRITER 149 expression or the phrase which comes up does not suit her, she throws aside the sheet — ¦ generally a large-sized sheet, gilt-edged — and begins over again. Her phraseology is at times very happy, trans lating her thought with a single vigorous or picturesque expression. In refusing to evacuate the Crimea, as the cowardice of Patiomkine ad vises her in 1788, and looking for arguments to justify her decision, she writes : ' Does a man who is in the saddle get down in order to hold on to the horse's tail?' Her letters, especially her letters to Grimm, are full, at the same time, of words and turns of phrase in which the bonhomie and carelessness of thought and lan guage alike are unbounded, - and sometimes be come positively gross. Not content with inter larding her incorrect French with German or Italian words and phrases, she often writes in slang. She puts 'sti-la' for 'celui-la,' 'ma 'for 'mais.' Probably she speaks in the same way. She is not averse from a certain triviality. We shall not venture to reproduce here the gaul- oiseries — are they indeed gauloiseries ? — which sometimes crop up when she is in the jocose and familiar vein, and we should certainly tire or even disgust our readers with the quips and 150 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA quibbles which she is for ever sprinkling over her epistolary conversation. It is true that this is her 'undress' style, her language of asides. Let us see now what is her style as a writer, her way of writing for the public. n It is in her works written for the stage that the pen of Catherine is most prolific. She does something of everything in literature, but espe cially dramatic writing. 'You ask me,' she writes to Grimm, 'why I write so many comedies. I will reply, like M. Pinc6, with three reasons : primo, because it amuses me ; secundo, because I should like to restore the national theatre, which, owing to its lack of new plays, is somewhat gone out of fashion ; and tertio, because it was time to put down the visionaries who were beginning to hold up their heads. Le Trompeur and Le Trompd have had a prodigious success. . . . The most amusing part of it is that at the first performance there were cries of "Author!" who, however, kept completely incognito, despite his huge success. Each of these pieces has brought in, at Moscow, 10,000 roubles to the management.' CATHERINE AS A WRITER 151 It is not needful, we see, to be an author played at Paris to secure the welcome that a happy idea always receives from the public, and the imperial diadem does not preclude happy ideas. In Le Trompeur and Le Trompd Catherine has brought Cagliostro and his dupes on the stage. The greater part of her plays are thus polemical or satirical, philosophical, social, or religious. She bravely attacks the ideas or tendencies, or even persons, that she disapproves of or dislikes. One may say that she has put into them her best work as a writer. She has, nevertheless, not the least sense of the dramatic. The dramatic element, properly speaking, is absent from her comedies as from her serious dramas. There is no art of composition, no knowledge of effect, no creative faculty, not a type among all these characters ; but here and there certain traits caught sur le vif in the manners of the country, a certain wit, good- humour, and a real gift of observation. The general tendency is that of Voltaire, toned down by the respect of certain sentiments, the religious sentiment among others, which she is obliged to treat so carefully in the surroundings in which she is placed. The principal aim is to oppose the 152 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA current of mysticism which begins to penetrate the upper strata of society, finding in the natural leanings of the Russian mind an element highly favourable to its propagation. It is with Free masonry and Martinism that she has most often a bone to pick. One day she assimilates the Freemasons to the Siberian sect of Chamanes, whom she tries to turn into ridicule by accusing them of extorting money from the weak-witted folk on whose credulity they trade. This is the theme of Chamane Sibirski (Chamane of Siberia), a piece for which an article in the Encyclopddie (Theosophy) has furnished her with the canvas ; it is also that of Obmanchtchik (The Deceiver), and Obolchtchenie (The Deceit). But she also attacks occasionally other errors and absurdities. One of the characters of O Vremia ! (translated into French under the title, O temps ! O moeurs I), Madame Hanjahina, in the fervour of her religious devotion, is in the act of performing fifty genu flections before a holy image. A peasant enters, and, after kissing his mistress's feet, puts a paper into her hand. How dare he trouble her at such a moment. ' Leave me, demon, imp of hell ! ' she cries. ' Fear the wrath of God, and mine.' She nevertheless glances at the paper : it is a petition, on the part of a lover who wishes to CATHERINE AS A WRITER 153 marry, and who, in his capacity of serf, requires the authorisation of his mistress. ' The idea of coming and disturbing with such requests a pro prietress of serfs, who is at her devotions ! ' Mme. Hanjahina turns the luckless importunate out of doors, and returns to her genuflections. But she has lost the reckoning. Must she do them all over again ?/She begins the task, but before beginning she summons her people, and orders them to give fifty times fifty blows to the peasant, who must have been sent by Satan him self, and who shall never marry, let him be assured of that, as long as she lives and continues to reverence the holv images. Catherine also, itTappears, wrote fiction. In the third volume of his History of German Literature, Kurtz includes the Empress among the number of German writers of the eighteenth century, as author of an Eastern romance, Obidach, written in 1786. He attributes to her several other works in her mother tongue, of which he does not mention the titles. We have also some fragments of the Empress's work as a fabulist. In writing for her grand children one of the tales that Grimm published for the first time in 1 790, in his Correspondence, Catherine was a little out of her reckoning. The *&• 154 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Tsarevitch Chlore, as well as the Tsarevitch Febei, are philosophical tales in the style of Voltaire, with allegorical turns, moralising intentions, and scientific pretensions, quite out of the range of childish minds. Catherine had, nevertheless, what we now call ' a knowledge of children,' the art of putting herself on the level of young, fresh, naive imaginations ; she had also a love of children. But, pen in hand, she sometimes forgot what she knew the best. Nor has she given evidence, in these compositions, of much fertility of invention, or of a particularly in genious turn of mind, or an original inspiration. She has once again stolen some one's ideas — those of Jean-Jacques and of Locke this time. Finally, Catherine has had her poetical moments. The taste came to her late in life. 'Imagine,' she writes in 1787, to Grimm, 'that on my galley, going down the Borysthene, he [the Comte de Segur] wanted to teach me to write verse ! I have been rhyming for the last four days, but it takes too much time, and I have begun too late.' Nevertheless, the year before, she had already asked Chrapowicki to send her a dictionary of Russian rhymes, if there was one in existence. We do not know what success attended her CATHERINE AS A WRITER 155 secretary's researches in this direction, but after 1788 we often enough find the Empress rhym ing, both in Russian and in French. In August 1788 she writes burlesque verses on the King of Sweden, while composing a French comedy, Les Voyages de Madame Bontemps, which she intends to have acted, by way of surprise, in the apartments of the favourite Mamonof on his birthday. In January 1789 she sends to Chrapo- wicki two Russian quatrains on the taking of Otchakof. One of them is somewhat remark able for its vigour of thought and the energy of some expressions. As for the poetic form, it escapes our estimation. Here is a French qua train, without date, which will permit the reader to see for himself the skill of Catherine in this branch of literature. It is an epitaph composed by her on the occasion of the death of the Count I. I. Chouvalof, who, since 1777, had been the Empress's high chamberlain — ' Ci git Monseigneur le grand chambellan A cent ans blanc comme Milan ; Le voila qui fait la moue ; Vivant il grattait la joue.' We shall doubtless be excused from giving more. 156 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Catherine also undertook to translate the Iliad. Three sheets of attempts in her hand writing are preserved in the archives of the empire. Certainly, she attempted many things. CHAPTER III CATHERINE AND EDUCATION I The institutions founded by Catherine for the furtherance of national education, her educational ideas and writings, hold too large a place in the history of her reign, and in that of the intellectual development of her people, for us to omit some consideration of them in this study, brief as must be the space that we can give them. On arriving at power, Catherine was quick to see what ad vantage she had derived, in the struggle from which she had come out victorious, from the superiority of her intellectual culture, the relative extent and variety of her knowledge. At the same time, she was able to judge how much it cost in Russia, even on the throne, to arrive at the little knowledge that she possessed. Finally, the handling of power must soon have shown her the enormous difficulties that the best-inten- tioned rulers have always had to meet with from the ignorance of their subjects. The reform, or 157 158 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA rather the establishment, of national education is, from the first, one of the principal ideas brought by the Empress to the government of her empire. In this regard she had everything, or almost everything, to do. The lower classes did not count, the middle class hardly existed ; there was therefore nothing to do but to raise the level of studies at the summit of the social ladder. But this level was terribly low. The children of the nobility were brought up by serfs or by foreign tutors. We can guess what they had to learn from the former ; as for the latter, we can guess also what sort of people they were — French for the most part — who at that time entered upon the career of private tutor in the far-distant Russia. Mehee de la Touche tells the story of the governess who, being asked by the parents of her future charge if she spoke French, replied: ' Sacrddid ! I should think so; if is my own language.' She was engaged without further question; only, the name of Mile. Sacredie always stuck to her. As ever, Catherine would do everything, and everything at once. In the second year of herreign, Betzky, the collaborator whom she picked out for this purpose, received the order to set to work on a project, which included a whole new system CA THERINE AND ED UCA TION 1 59 of education, able to serve as basis for a number of scholastic institutions, to be set on foot sub sequently. The result was the publication, in 1764, of General Regulations for the Education of Children of both Sexes. Betzky has admitted that the ideas developed in this document were those of the Empress herself. They must be considered bold, if not original : they are more or less those of Locke and of Jean-Jacques Rousseau; those of Jean- Jacques especially, little as Catherine generally professed to think of his genius. It was a project for fabricating men and women not in the least like any that had ever been seen in Russia, taken radically away from the soil which had given them birth, transplanted from their natural surroundings, and developed in an atmosphere artificially prepared for the culture to which they were destined. They were to be taken at the age of five or six, kept strictly shut up, and removed from all outside influence, to the age of twenty or more. Catherine seriously thought of carrying out this programme. If this was not done, at least within the desired limits and proportions — that is to say, throughout the whole length and breadth of public education — it is because she encountered great difficulties on the way, and that here, too, patience, 160 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA firmness of resolution, and continuity of effort were once again lacking to her will. Difficulties arose at the outset from the opposition that she met with, not only in her immediate surroundings — but little enlightened itself, as a rule, and con sequently indifferent, if not hostile, to the develop ment of any programme whatever, relating to this order of ideas — but also among even the most open-minded and cultivated of those to whom she could appeal, outside the official sphere, for some amount of help in her enterprise. The ideas of Jean-Jacques were by no means those of Novikof, for example, nor those of the circle in which the influence of the publicist was exercised. Now, this was perhaps the most intelligent circle in the Russia of that time. Novikof had pedagogic views of his own, entirely different, giving a large place, in national education, to local feeling, to custom, tradition, to the ways of the country, averse from the introduction of foreign elements. As for the officials at Catherine's disposal, they were inclined to ask whether public education, and schools in general, were of any real value. In 1785, at one of the Empress's evening recep tions, as Patiomkine was discussing the necessity of starting a large number of universities through out Russia, Zavadofski, the director of the CATHERINE AND EDUCATION 161 recently established normal schools, observed that the University of Moscow had not produced a single distinguished man in science during the whole of its existence. 'That,' replied Patiom kine, ' is because you hindered me from continuing my studies by turning me out.' This was a fact ; the favourite had been sent down, and obliged to enter a regiment, which was the beginning of his fortune. He forgot to say that his idleness and misconduct had quite justified the punishment. Catherine thereupon declared that she herself owed much to the university education : since she had had in her service some men who had carried out their studies at Moscow, she had been able to make out something in the memoranda and other official documents presented for her signature. It was after this conversation that she decided upon founding the Universities of Nijni-Nov- gorod, and Iekatierinoslaf. But the latter town had itself yet to be founded. Another difficulty presented itself in the selec tion of a staff of teachers. In organising the establishment of the corps of cadets, Betzky took for director a former prompter from the French theatre, and for inspector of classes a former valet de chambre of Catherine's mother. One of the professors, Faber, had been a lackey VOL. II. L 162 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA in the service of two other French professors, Pictet and Mallet, whose colleague he now became. Pictet and Mallet having ventured to protest, Betzky contented himself with giving Faber the rank of lieutenant in the Russian army, which, it appeared, put things straight. The master of police in the establishment was a certain Lascaris, a mere adventurer, who after wards became director, with the title of lieutenant- colonel. The greatest liberty reigned in this school, if we may believe the testimony of Bobrinski, the natural son of Catherine, who was brought up there : the ideas of Jean-Jacques were liberally applied. Catherine was thus forced to complicate her programme of scholastic organisation ; she had first to think of training the masters for the future pupils that she meant to intrust to them. She sent to Oxford, to the Academy of Turin, to the schools in Germany, young men who were to be prepared for the delicate duties of professorship. But many other things were yet wanting for the founding of national schools, and first, to know how to set about it. She confessed it naively to Grimm- ' Listen a moment, my philosophical friends : CATHERINE AND EDUCATION you would be charming, adorable, if you would have the charity to map out a plan of study for young people, from A B C to the University. I am told that there should be three kinds of schools, and I who have not studied and have not been at Paris, I have neither knowledge nor insight in the matter, and consequently I know not what should be learnt, nor even what can be learnt, nor where one is to find out unless from you. I am very much concerned about an idea for a university and its management, a gym nasium and its management, a school and its management. ' She intimates, however, the means by which she intends to get over the difficulty for the present — ' Until you accede or do not accede to my request, I know what I shall do : I shall hunt through the Encyclopedie. Oh, I shall be certain to haul out what I want and what I don't want.' The philosophers remaining silent, it is the Encyclopedie that has to afford matter for the conceptions to which the universal genius of Catherine betakes itself, in this new order of things. 1 64 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA II These conceptions were destined to remain sterile, with one exception. Some scholastic establishments date, it is true, from her reign. But these are special schools, that, for instance, of artillery and engineering, founded in 1762, the school of commerce founded in 1772, the academy of mines in 1773, the academy of Beaux Arts in 1774. In 1781 there was even an attempt at popular schools, and in 1783 Jankovitz was summoned for the foundation of normal schools, after the order of those in Austria. Ten were at once founded at St. Petersburg, and the following year they had 1000 pupils. Catherine was full of enthusiasm on the subject, and wrote to Grimm : ' Do you know that we are really doing fine things, and getting along famously, not in the air (for, from dread of fire, I have expressly forbidden aerostatic globes) but ventre a terre, for the enlightening of the people.' In reply Grimm conferred upon the sovereign the title of Universal-normalschulmeisterin. But all that was not the national education according to Locke and Jean-Jacques, of which the Empress dreamed, and which ought, she thought, to regenerate Russia. The dream was CATHERINE AND EDUCATION 165 unrealised save in the establishment founded in 1764 for the education of girls, in the famous Smolnyi Monastyr, which was one of the favourite achievements of Catherine, the one among all others to which she was most constant ; the majestic edifice on the banks of the Neva is even now the admiration of travellers from the West. Demoiselles nobles are still educated there in the most careful manner, and but lately the two daughters of the Prince of Montenegro grew up within these walls, where so often the Empress was to be seen surrounded by her pupils, following their studies with solicitude, and in teresting herself in their recreations. Rigorous seclusion, during twelve years, the removal of all outside influences, even family influences, even religious influences : all the details of the plan sketched out in 1764 were to be found in the scheme of this institution. No one was allowed to go out, except to go to the court, whither the Empress frequently summoned the scholars whom she had particularly noticed. There were hardly any holidays. Every six weeks the parents were admitted to see their children, and to witness a public examination which showed what progress they were making. That was all. The lay schoolmistresses never spoke to their 1 66 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA pupils of God or the Devil save in general terms, without any attempt at proselytism ; the clergy were admitted to this singular monastery, and to some part in the instruction given there, but within prescribed limits. It was a convent having as abbess a philosophising Empress; monastic life with a door of communication opening on the splendours and seductions of the imperial palace ; St. Cyr, minus Christianity, and not merely the severe and gloomy Christianity of Madame de Maintenon, but Christianity in general. A long- bearded pope was sometimes seen there ; the Christian teaching was absent. The very plan of the establishment was alien to it, for could anything be more absolutely contrary to its spirit than the separation into two divisions of the inmates, kept absolutely apart and distinct, by the very first principles of the undertaking ? In this establishment, in which there is room for 500 pupils, there are daughters of the nobility and of the middle classes. They have nothing in com mon one with another, either in mode of living, of education, or even of costume. The former are indulged with fine clothes, the refinements of the toilette, of the table, and of accommodation, a course of study in which the arts of pleasing hold a large place ; the latter have to put up with a CATHERINE AND EDUCATION 167 coarse kind of clothing, with simple dishes, with lessons in sewing, washing, and cooking. The colour of the clothes is the same, but the ' corset ' takes the place of the elegant 'fourreau,' and is •completed by a pinafore, which denotes the humility of their condition. All that is Pagan, utterly Pagan, as is the plan of the teaching itself, into which Diderot would have wished to in troduce thorough instruction in anatomy ; as are the sallies into the frivolous and corrupt world of the court. As it has been noted, Catherine is the first Russian sovereign to give attention to the educa tion of women. She gave to her undertaking all the breadth and magnificence that we find in all her creations, and that would seem to be in some sort the natural emanation of herself. But she also put to proof principles which she had not sufficiently gauged. The germs that she thus introduced into the intellectual and moral develop ment of her sex still bear fruit in Russia, not perhaps always for the best. We have had means of judging, in the Empress's confidences to Grimm, what point she had reached, after fifteen years of sway, in her own studies and notions in regard to this delicate and difficult matter : she obviously went right 1 68 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA ahead, picking up principles and ideas for her plans of education as she picked up soldiers for her plans of conquest. In the very numerous writings on educational subjects that she has handed down to posterity, some ideas and in genious intuitions alternate with the most para doxical assertions, as, for example, that ' the study of languages and sciences ought to hold the last place in education,' or that 'the health of the body and the inclination of the mind towards what is good make up the whole of education.' The idea of enlightened despotism, coming out in the blind subjection of pupil to master, accords as best it can with that of the progressive develop ment of the spirit of independence, in which one is to endeavour to fortify the child's mind. As a whole it is almost incoherent. Catherine saw clearly that the way in which the youth of Russia in her time was educated was useless alike to them and to Russia, and she admitted the necessity of a change of system, as an abso lute necessity of national progress. It was only on this one point that she had quite made up her mind. At her time, and in the place that she occupied, coming after Ann, Elizabeth, and Peter III., it was something already to have made this discovery and cherished this conviction. But CATHERINE AND EDUCATION 169 the glory of having been the founder of the national education was not to be hers. The judgment of posterity has given this title to a name more humble than hers, that of a man whom she treated as a foe, to whom she gave a dungeon and a chain as the reward of the labours of which Russia reaps the benefit to-day. It was in the educational establishments founded at St. Petersburg by Novikof that the programme of studies and the plan of scholastic organisation now in force throughout the empire were really mapped out. BOOK IV INNER ASPECTS CHAPTER I HOME LIFE I We shall try to give an account of a single day in the life of the Empress, an ordinary day, one of those which show the habitual course of her existence. We are in winter, let us suppose, and about the middle of the reign, in 1785 for example, a year of peace. The Empress occu pies the Zimnyi Dvariets, the Winter Palace. The private suite of rooms, on the first story, is not very large. On mounting the little stair case, we come to a room in which a table, covered with writing materials, awaits the secre taries and others employed in her Majesty's immediate service. We pass through this first room, and enter the dressing-room, whose win dows look out on the square of the palace. It is there that the Empress's hair is dressed 170 HOME LIFE 171 before a small circle of intimate friends and high functionaries, admitted to the early morning audiences. It is the petit lever of her Majesty. There is no grand lever. Two doors open before us : one leads to the Diamond Room, the other to the bedroom. The bedroom communi cates at the back with a private dressing-room, and at the left with a work-room opening on the Mirror Room, and the other reception-rooms. It is six o'clock in the morning, the hour at which the Empress rises. By the side of her bed is a basket, where, on a couch of pink satin ornamented with lace, sleeps a whole family of little dogs, Catherine's inseparable companions. They are English greyhounds. In 1770 Dr. Dimsdale, whom the Empress, as we know, sum moned from London to inoculate her, brought over for her a couple of these creatures. They have increased and multiplied, so that one sees a greyhound in all the aristocratic houses in St. Petersburg. The Empress always has half a dozen about her, sometimes more. The bell- ringer of the palace having rung the hour of six, Maria Savichna Pierekousihina, the head femme de chambre of her Majesty, enters the bedroom. Formerly Catherine had no one about her at this time ; she rose by herself, and in 172 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA winter even lit her own fire. Time has changed this habit. But to-day her Majesty is late in waking. The night before she was not so early as usual in going to bed ; an interesting conversation detained her at the Hermitage after ten. Maria Savichna coolly finds a divan, opposite to the sovereign's bed, lies down on it, and seizes the happy chance of a little additional nap. But now the Empress awakens. She gets up, and in her turn awakens the slumbering Maria Savichna. She goes into her dressing- room. A little warm water to rinse out her mouth, and a little ice to rub over her face, are all that her Majesty is in need of for the moment. But where is Catherine Ivanovna, the young Calmuck, whose business it is to have these things ready? She is always behind her time, this Catherine Ivanovna ! What, already a quarter past six ! The Empress has a move ment of impatience ; she taps her foot nervously on the ground. Here she is at last : beware of her Majesty's wrath ! Catherine snatches from her hands the silver-gilt ewer, and, hastily making use of it, she apostrophises the lazy girl— ' What are you thinking about, Catherine Ivanovna? Do you think you will always be HOME LIFE 173 able to go on like this ? One day you will get married, you will leave my service, and your husband, be sure, will not be like me. He will be much more particular. Think of your future, Catherine Ivanovna ! ' That is all, and that is repeated day after day. Meanwhile the Empress goes briskly into her work-room, followed by her dogs, who have waited till now to leave their luxurious bed. It is time for ddjeuner. The coffee is waiting: good. Is it strong enough ? It needs a pound of coffee for the five cups that the Empress is accustomed to take. One day one of her secre taries, a certain Kozmine, coming to make his report, is benumbed with the cold. The Empress rings. ' A cup of coffee for the poor shivering wretch ! ' She insists on his swallowing the steaming cup at a draught. But what is the matter ? He is unwell ; he has palpitations of the heart. He has had the coffee that is pre pared for her Majesty, and which she alone can drink. It never occurred to any one that the cup was for the secretary ; who could imagine that her Majesty would share her ddjetmer with a mere tchinovnik like him ? Generally Catherine only shares her ddjeuner with her dogs. The imperial coffee is not in their line ; but there is 174 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA thick cream, biscuits, sugar. The whole con tents of the sugar-basin go to them, and the biscuits too. Her Majesty has now no further need of any one. If her dogs want to go out, she opens the door for them herself. She wishes to be alone, and to give herself entirely to her work or correspondence, till nine o'clock. But where is her favourite snuff-box, which should always be on her work-table ? A portrait of Peter the Great, which is on the cover, is there, she says, to remind her that she has to continue the work of the Great Czar. Catherine takes a great deal of snuff. But she never carries a snuff-box. There must be one at hand in every corner of her palace. She uses only a particular kind of tobacco that is specially grown for her in her garden of Tzarskoie-Sielo. When writing, she needs to take snuff almost all the time. She rings. 'Will you kindly,' she says to a valet de chambre who enters, 'look for my snuff-box.' 'Veuillez,' ' Prenez la peine de,' are formulas that she invariably uses in speaking to the people about her, however humble. At nine precisely Catherine returns to her bedroom. It is there that she receives the officials who come to give in their report. The HOME LIFE 175 prefect of police enters first. Her Majesty is dressed, at this moment, in a white dressing- gown of gros de Toiirs, with large folds. She wears a cap of white crape, which the vigour of her work or the excitement of her conversation with Grimm has accidentally pushed aside, to right or left. Her complexion is fresh, her eyes bright ; nevertheless, in reading the papers pre sented for her signature, she puts on glasses. ' You don't need this, do you ? ' she says to her secretary Gribofski. ' How old are you ? ' ' Twenty-six.' 'You have not had time, as I have, to lose your sight in the service of the empire.' On entering, Gribofski has bowed very low. The Empress has replied with a slight inclination of the head, after which, with an amiable smile, she lends her - hand to the secretary. At this moment Gribofski can notice that a front tooth is missing from the otherwise well-furnished mouth of the sovereign. On stooping to kiss the imperial hand, a white, plump hand, he has felt a pressure of this august hand, and he has heard the words 'sit down,' which summon him to his task. It is a task often interrupted. Ministers, generals, high officials, who have been granted audiences, are announced, and the Em- 176 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA press is often considerate enough not to make them wait. Now General Souvarof is ushered in. Without looking at the Empress, he marches with his automatic soldier's step straight to the right, where, in a corner, a lamp is always kept burning before the image of Our Lady of Kasan. He stops short before the icone, and bends three times, striking the ground with his forehead. Having accomplished this rite, he turns sharply, as if he were at drill, takes a few steps forward, and a fourth genuflection brings him to the sovereign's feet. ' Pray, are you not ashamed ? ' she murmurs. She makes him sit down, addresses two or three questions to him, one after another, to which he replies in the tone of a trooper catechised by a corporal, and she dismisses him after two minutes. Other personages arrive. But, all at once, some one whispers a word in the Empress's ear, she gives a sign of the head, and all retire : it is the favourite, Patiomkine, Lanskoi, or Mamonof, who wishes to come in. For him her Majesty is always visible, and, when he comes, every one else goes. This goes on till mid-day, afterwards till one o'clock when the dinner-hour has been changed from one to two. After dismissing her secretary, HOME LIFE 177 the Empress retires to her private dressing-room, where she makes a complete toilette, dresses, and has her hair dressed by her old coiffeur Koz- lof. Her costume, except on great occasions, is extremely simple : a loose and open gown, a la Moldave, with double sleeves ; the under ones of a light material, plaited to the wrist, the over ones very long, of similar material to the skirt, and caught up at the back. The gown is of violet or grey silk ; thfere are no jewels, no indication of supreme rank ; comfortable shoes with very low heels. Catherine puts no coquetry in anything but the arrangement of her hair : she wears her hair drawn back, showing the whole of the forehead, the development of which she per haps likes to emphasise. Her hair is long and heavy ; when she sits before her toilet-table, it touches the ground. On state occasions a diadem crowns the cunning edifice raised by the skilful hands of Kozlof ; but then the silk dress is replaced by red velvet, and the costume thus transformed, though it keeps much the same easy character, takes the name of ' the Russian dress.' It is obligatory at court, despite the heavy sacrifices it imposes on the young women, who are distressed at not being got up in the Paris fashion. VOL. II. M 178 CA THERINE II. OF RUSSIA Her private toilette over, Catherine goes into the official toilette-chamber, where she finishes dressing. It is the petit lever. The number of those who have the privilege of being present is - limited ; but in spite of this, the room is full. There are, first, the Empress's grandchildren, who are invariably brought in; then the favourite ; with a few friends, such as Leon Narychkine. There is also the court fool, who is a person of much wisdom : Matrena Danilevna holds this office, to which she adds that of tale-bearer. She diverts the sovereign by her jokes, and Catherine is kept au courant of all that is going on at court and in the city, the scandals in the air since the night before, and even the best kept family secrets. Matrena Danilevna has an eye and ear everywhere, and admirable police instincts. One day she is very severe upon Ryleief, the chief of imperial police. Catherine summons him to her, and advises him in a friendly manner to send some fat fowls and geese to Matrena Danilevna, who seems to be in want of them in order to duly celebrate the Prasdnik (Easter). A week passes. 'And Ryleief?' asks the Empress of the worthy gossip, who is dishing up to her the string of daily tattle. Matrena Danilevna has nothing but praise for the official, for whom, a week HOME LIFE 1 79 before, she had nothing but abuse. ' Ah ! ah ! ' interrupts Catherine. ' I see what it is : he has sent you some fowls and geese.' But now the Empress is seated before her toilet- table, a superb table in massive gold. Her four femmes de chambi'e approach her. They are four old maids, whom she has had in her service since her accession to the throne, and who have passed their heyday in her service. They were all of them very plain. One of them, Maria Stiepanovna Aleksieievna, paints her face in the most preposterous way. They are all Russian. To give her subjects an example that they have never, up to the present time, followed, Catherine has absolutely none but Russian servants. Now Maria Stiepanovna presents to the sovereign a piece of ice, which she rubs over her cheeks in public, to prove that she herself has no recourse to the coquettish tricks employed by her femme de chambre ; the old Palakoutchi places on her head a little crape cap, this time carefully adjusted ; the two Zvieref sisters add some pins, and her Majesty's toilette is over. The whole ceremony has lasted about ten minutes, during which Catherine has spoken to several of those present. And now to table. Up to the time of the Swedish war, dinner was at one o'clock. At that 180 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA time the pressing occupations with which Cathe rine was burdened made her put off the hour of dinner, which remained afterwards at two o'clock. On ordinary days there are generally about a dozen guests at her Majesty's table : the favourite first of all, as a matter of course, a few friends, Count Razoumofski, Field-Marshal Prince Galit- zine, Prince Patiomkine, the Count of Anhalt, the two Narychkine brothers, the General Aide-de-Camp, Count Tchernichef, Count Stro- gonof, Prince Bariatinski, Countess Bruce, Coun tess Branicka, Princess Dachkof, and, later on, during the last years of the reign, the General Aide-de-Camp Passek, Count Strogonof, the Maid of Honour Protassof, Vice-Admiral Ribas, the General Governor of the Polish provinces, Toutolmine, and two of the French emigres, Comte Esterhazy and the Marquis de Lambert. Dinner lasts about an hour. The dishes are very simple. Catherine cares nothing about elaborate cookery. Her favourite dish is boiled beef with salted cucumber; her drink, water with gooseberry sirup. Later, on the advice of physicians, she takes a glass of Madeira or Rhine wine. For desert, some fruit, apples or cherries by preference. Among her cooks there is one who cooks abominably. For years she HOME LIFE has never noticed it. When it has been pointed out to her, she has refused to dismiss the man, saying that he has been in her service too long. She merely inquires when his turn comes, and then says on sitting down to table : ' Ladies and gentlemen, we must exer cise our patience ; we have a week's fast before us.' Twice a week her Majesty keeps jour maigre, and on these occasions she has only two or three people to dinner. It should be added that her guests are not obliged to go beyond the palace to find better cheer. Her Majesty's table is poorly served, and Catherine sees that the expenses are kept down ; but the table of the favourite, Zoubof, that of his protector, the Count N. J. Saltykof, and that of the Countess Branicka, Patiomkine's niece, which are all three paid for out of the imperial treasury, come to 400 roubles (2000 francs) a day in 1792, without counting the drink, which, with tea, coffee, and chocolate, comes to 200 roubles a day extra. After dinner there are a few minutes' con versation ; then every one retires. Catherine takes up her embroidery, at which she is very skilful, and Betzky reads aloud to her. When 182 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Betzky, now growing old, begins to lose his sight, she does not have him replaced ; she reads herself, with the aid of her glasses. An hour passes in this way, and now her secretary is announced : twice a week he comes with the courier, who is immediately despoiled. The other days, it is the officials who come, one after another, handing in reports, demanding instructions. All the while the Empress gener ally has with her her grandchildren, with whom she plays in the intervals of her business. By four o'clock she has well earned the rest and recreation which she now allows herself. She betakes herself to her favourite Hermitage, through the long gallery which connects it with the Winter Palace. Lanskoi or Mamonof or Zoubof accompanies her. She examines her new collections, sees to their arrangement, has a game of billiards, and sometimes amuses herself with turning ivory. At six o'clock she returns to the reception-rooms. Slowly she makes the round of her salons, giving an amiable word here and there, and then sits down to her whist-table. She plays whist at ten roubles the rubber, rocambole, piquet, and Boston ; always very cheaply. Her usual partners are Count Razou- mofski, Field-Marshal Count Tchernichef, Field- HOME LIFE 183 Marshal Prince Galitzine, Count Bruce, Count Strogonof, Prince Orlof, Prince Viazemski, and the foreign ministers. Catherine gives the pre ference to the two first, because they play well, and do not try to make her gain. She herself plays her very best. The chamberlain Tchert- kof, whom she sometimes admits to make up a party, generally gets in a rage, reproaches her with not playing fair, .and, sometimes, in his vexation, throws the cards' in her Majesty's face. She never loses her temper, defends her way of playing as best she can, appealing to the bystanders. One day she calls on the two French exiles, who are of the party, to give their opinion. ' Fine arbiters ! ' cries Tchertkof. ' They be trayed their own king ! ' This time Catherine has to impose silence on the too reckless player. One sees that she has no easy task to maintain at her court the tone that should reign there. Another time, as she is playing at whist with Count Strogonof, General Arharof, and Count Stackelberg, Strogonof con stantly loses. At last, unable to contain himself any longer, and forgetting all the convenances, he rises in a heat, leaves the party without finishing it, and, with purple cheeks, begins to stride to 1 84 CATHERINE IT. OF RUSSIA and fro in the Diamond Room, giving free course to his irritation — ' I shall lose all my money ! As for you, it makes no difference for you if you lose. But as for me, I shall soon be in, destitution.' Thinking that this is going too far, Arharof would interfere, but Catherine stops him : ' Let him be ! He has been just like that for fifty years. You will never change him, no more shall I.' The play invariably stops at ten o'clock. Her Majesty then retires. Except on reception-days, there is no supper, and even on these days Catherine only sits down to table as a matter of form. Returning to her private suite of rooms, she goes immediately to her bedroom, drinks a large glass of boiled water, and goes to bed. Her day is ended. n This is a quiet enough course of existence, and the picture that we have just presented will not, perhaps, be much in agreement with the very different pictures presented to us by the usual legend. We have, however, drawn from the best sources ; but we find a very natural explanation of the contrast between legend and HOME LIFE 185 history. The former draws its inspiration, for one thing, from what was really reprehensible, and might well have justified the most ill-natured sup positions in regard to one side of the Empress's private life, on which we shall enlarge later. Legend and ill-feeling have also made capital out of certain periods of dissipation which were never theless only accidental and occasional in the history of the great Empress, such as that which followed the great crisis of despair after the death of Lanskoi. The general course of life of Catherine appears under quite a different light, and, if we can make up our minds to throw a veil over certain pleasures, which, for the rest, never dis turbed, in a permanent fashion, the harmonious balance of her faculties, nor the wisely planned programme of her occupations, the other distrac tions, associated with them, were quite mild and innocent. Those who, on the strength of certain reports, have looked upon her existence as one continual orgy, would find it hard indeed to justify such a conception by the testimony of fact. History gives no support to it. But is this history well informed ? Did not the more or less edifying outside of the Empress's private life hide something far more scandalous under neath? Were there not, in the palaces of St. 1 86 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Petersburg and Tzarskoie-Sielo, in the rooms of the Hermitage, certain hidden corners, conceal ing more unmentionable pleasures ? We do not think so, for reasons founded as much on the character of Catherine as on the very organisa tion of her private life, itself, in one way, so much a scandal, but a scandal which was official, cynically but frankly avowed. The Empress has given the lie, for the rest, not in words but in actions, to the greater part of the infamous accusations that were brought against her during her lifetime. The Englishman Harris wrote in January 1779 : 'The Empress becomes from day to day more disordered and dissipated, and her society is composed of the lowest set among the courtiers ; the health of her Majesty is certainly tried by the life she leads.' And the Foreign Office concluding that the sovereign, ' worn out by debauch,' had only a short while to live, all Europe soon found out, rather at its expense, that Catherine was quite alive, healthy in body and mind. Never was she in better health, physically and mentally, than at this time. Catherine was certainly sensual, licentious if you will, but she was nothing of a Bacchante. Insatiably amorous, as she was infinitely ambi tious, she accommodated her love affairs, as she HOME LIFE 187 accommodated her ambition, to certain rules of conduct, from which she never varied. Favour ites had always a large place in her palace and in all the material, moral, and even political organisation of her life ; but the sovereign always held her own, and, strange as it may sound, the quiet housewife as well. Catherine was passionately fond of children ; it was one of her favourite pastimes to play with them. In a letter addressed to Ivan Tchernichef in 1769 she brings herself before us, with the usual company of her leisure hours, and we see her, Gregory Orlof, Count Razoumofski, and Zahar Tchernichef, Ivan's brother, playing with the little Markof, whom the sovereign has just adopted, gambolling, rolling on the ground, com mitting a thousand absurdities, and all the time in fits of laughter. The little Markof, then six years old, is afterwards replaced by the son of Admiral Ribeaupierre. The child is hard to tame, having got into his little brain the idea that he has been brought to the palace that he may have his head cut off. But Catherine gradually wins him over, cutting out paper figures, making toys for him. One day she tears a ribbon out of her collerette to make the reins of a horse and pair that she has cut out of card- 1 88 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA board. She has him with her for hours together, sends him away when any one comes to her on business, then sends for him again ; at the age of five she makes him an officer of the Guards. He is not the only one to be thus favoured : two little Galitzines, four grand-nephews of Patiom kine, the son of the Field-Marshal Count Salty kof, the son of the hetman Branicki, the young Count Chouvalof, who afterwards accompanied Napoleon to Elba, and young Valentine Ester hazy, all have their share. Little Ribeaupierre lives under her Majesty's roof till the age of twelve. On sending him away, Catherine wishes him to write to her, and she replies to his letter in her own handwriting. But her letter is so full of erasures — she has not, this time, taken the trouble to begin over again — that she has it copied out by her secretary, Popof, who after wards sends on the original. After children, we dare not say before, but it would perhaps be more correct, dogs, and ani mals in general, play a large part in Catherine's private life. The family of Sir Tom Anderson is certainly, of all the families of the empire, the one whose position at court is most solidly established. Here is the list, in one of the Empress's letters — HOME LIFE ' First comes the head of the race, Sir Tom Anderson, his spouse, Duchess Anderson, their children, the young Duchess Anderson, Mr. Anderson, and Tom Thomson : the last is established at Moscow under the guardianship of Prince Volkonski, Governor- General of the city. There are also, besides these, whose reputation is made, four or five young people of infinite promise, who are being brought up in the best houses in Moscow and St. Petersburg, as for example that of Prince Orlof, MM. Narychkine, and Prince Toupiakine. Sir Tom Anderson has taken as second wife Mile. Mimi, who has since taken the name of Mimi Anderson. But up to now there is no family. Besides these legitimate marriages (since the faults as well as the virtues of people must be told in their history) M. Tom has had several illegitimate attachments : the Grand Duchess has several pretty bitches who have greatly taken him, but up to the present no bastards have been seen, and it would seem that there are none ; anything to the contrary is a mere calumny.' But Catherine was not content with dogs alone. In 1785 she takes a fancy to a white squirrel, which she brings up herself, and feeds out of her hand with nuts. And about the same 1 90 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA time she gets a monkey, of whose cleverness and pretty ways she often boasts. ' You should have seen,' she writes to Grimm, ' the amazement of Prince Henry ' (brother of the King of Prussia) ' one day when Prince Potemkin let loose a monkey in the room, with which I began to play, instead of going on with the conversation we were engaged in. He opened his eyes, but in spite of all, he could not resist the tricks of the monkey.' At that time she had also a cat, the present of Prince Patiomkine : ' the most tom-cat of all tom-cats, gay, witty, not obstinate.' The present is in return for a service in Sevres porcelain, which she has had made for the favourite, saying that it was for her, 'so that it should be finer.' The Anderson family, however, loses none of its rights. 'You will excuse me,' says the Empress in one of her letters, ' if all the preceding page is very badly written. I am extremely hampered at the moment by a certain young and fair Zemire, who of all the Thomassins is the one who will come closest to me, and who pushes her pretensions to the point of having her paws on my paper.' Let us quote also this fragment of the Sou venirs of Madame Vigee-Lebrun : ' When the Empress had returned to town, I used to see her HOME LIFE 191 every morning open the shutters and throw out crumbs to hundreds of rooks who came every day at the same hour to seek their pittance. In the evening, about ten, when the rooms were lit up, I used also to see her send for her grand children and some persons of the court, to play at hot cockles and hide-and-seek.' Madame Vigee-Lebrun lodged in a house op posite to the imperial palace. Regardless of local colour, legend has since transformed the rooks into pigeons ; but, legend or history, does not all that the one and the other tell us of the tastes and habits of Catherine stand out in anything but the colours of a Messalina ? Doubtless the objection that we have ourselves raised retains its force. Is what we know of the interior of a palace in which Catherine dwelt in company with an Orlof or a Patiomkine the whole truth, the true truth, as the Italians say? Doubt is the first virtue of the historian, and we would not forget it. Nevertheless, as we have already said, Catherine was no hypocrite ; she lived openly before the world, and she had the pride, or the shamelessness, to seek no disguise, and to defy rebuke, at the point where our respect and admira tion must needs forsake her. 192 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA III From the outside, the Empress's life offers little material for the chronicler, favourably in clined or the reverse. Apart from the great tours which stand out in the history of her reign, that in the Crimea for instance, she preferred generally to keep within the bounds of her vast and luxurious palaces. Sometimes, during the carnival, on a fine sunny day, she would make a longer expedition. Three great sledges, drawn by ten or twelve horses, carried her and her ordinary retinue. To each of these sledges a dozen smaller ones were fastened on behind with ropes, and into these the lords and ladies of the court crowded pell-mell, and the strange cavalcade set out at a gallop. They have dinner in the suburbs of the capital, in the Tchesme Palace, and afterwards cross the Neva and go on as far as Gorbilevo, an imperial villa where there are montagnes russes ; returning to the Taurida Palace for supper. On one of these excursions, after having dined and returned to her place in one of the large sledges, which she has all to herself, Catherine inquires of her squire if the drivers and lackeys have had their dinner. On his replying in the negative, she gets down HOME LIFE I93 from the sledge. ' They want dinner as much as we do,' she says. And, as there is no meal ready for them, she waits patiently until the hunger of the poor servants is appeased. But these escapades are rare. The sovereign does not care to be seen too often, except in her palace, in the midst of the decorative mise-en- scene that surrounds her ; she fears to lessen her prestige. One day when she has a headache, and a walk in the open air has done her good, she is recommended to try it again next day, the headache having returned. ' What would the people say,' she replies, ' if they saw me in the street two days following ? ' Twice in the course of the winter she goes to the masked ball. Those whom she invites to accompany her find masks and costumes at the court. Generally, on these occasions, in order the better to preserve her incognito, Catherine goes in some one else's coach. She likes to put on a man's costume, and to puzzle the women, to whom she pays court, and whose curiosity she puts off the track. Her voice, rather deep, lends itself to this disguise. One of those whose fancy she takes, carrying her imaginary conquest to some lengths, is so curious that she ends by violently tearing off the mask of the mysterious cavalier. Catherine is very angry, VOL. II. N 194 CA THERINE II. OF RUSSIA but she merely reproaches the too susceptible fair one of having broken the etiquette in usage a.t fetes of this kind. She accepts no invitations. The opulent Prince of Taurida, Count Razoumofski, Prince Field-Marshal Galitzine, the two Narychkines, the Countess Bruce, and Madame Batiouchkine are almost the only persons who have sometimes the honour of having her as guest. But as a rule she will not have herself announced, delighting in the confusion caused by her unexpected ap parition. In spring she leaves the Winter Palace for the Taurida Palace, when that magnificent abode, built by Patiomkine, has been bought by her from the wealthy favourite. She generally goes there on Palm Sunday, and pays her Easter devotions. She remains there till the month of May, when she returns to the shades of Tzar skoie-Sielo. This abode that she has built, in place of the residences of Peterhof and Oranien- baum, about which there cling too mournful souvenirs, is the spot where she is most happy. There, no more reception, no more court cere mony, no more tiresome audiences. Affairs even are in some sort suspended, or at least reduced to what is strictly necessary. The Empress rises HOME LIFE I95 at six or seven, and begins her day with a walk. Lightly dressed, a cane in her hand, she strolls through her gardens. The faithful Pierekousihina, a valet de chambre, and a huntsman, are the only ones who accompany her. But the Anderson family, one may be sure, is of the party, and the sovereign's presence is known from afar by the joyous barking of the band that gambols before her on the grass. Catherine is passionately fond of gardening, and plantomania, as she calls that taste, rivals with her the taste for building. She follows, in this respect, the fashion of the age. ' I am madly enamoured at present,' she writes in 1772, 'of gardens in the English manner, curved lines, gentle slopes, pools in the form of lakes, archipelagos in terra firma, and I have a profound scorn for straight lines. I hate foun tains that torture the water to make it take a course contrary to nature : in a word anglomania dominates my plantomania.' And five years later : ' I often enrage my gardeners, and more than one German gardener has said to me : Aber, mein Gott, was wird das werden ! I found that the greater part were mere pedantic followers of routine : the departures from routine that I often propose to them horrify them, and, when I see that routine is too strong for me, I employ the 196 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA first docile young gardener that comes to hand. There is no one who laughs at my plantomania so much as Count Orlof. He spies on me, mimics me, makes fun of me, criticises me, but, on going away, he asked me to look after his garden during the summer, and this year I am going to play pranks there after my own fashion. His land is close to mine ; I am very proud that he has recognised my merits as a gardener.' The gardens of Tzarskoie are public. One day, sitting on a bench with la Pierekousihina, Catherine sees a man pass, a citizen of St. Peters burg, who, seeing the two old women, and not recognising the~~sovefe'i'ghrcasts a scornful look upon them, and goes on his way. La Pierekousi hina is indignant, but Catherine replies : ' What would you have, Maria Savichna? /J Twenty years ago that would not have happened to us ; we have aged : it is our fault.' // After her walk, at nine, Catherine begins work, and till six o'clock the rest of the day goes on much as it does in town, except that there are fewer officials and tedious clerkly people, and that the private retinue is lessened. One or two invited guests from the capital sometimes appear at dinner. At six o'clock, another walk, this time in larger numbers, but in the most complete HOME LIFE 197 liberty. The Empress's grandchildren play at base-ball, with Count Razoumofski as umpire. If it rains, Catherine gathers together her people in the famous gallery of colonnades covered with glass, in which one sees the busts of the great men, ancient and modern, for whom she has a particular admiration. The foreign ministers are sometimes admitted to share the pleasures of the imperial villegiahtra. The Comte de S6gur, who had this honour, thus recounts his recollections of it : — Catherine II. had the extreme kindness to show me herself all the beauties of this magnificent pleasure-house, whose limpid waters, fresh groves, elegant pavilions, noble architecture, priceless furniture, cabinets panelled in porphyry, in lapis- lazuli, in malachite, had a fairy-like air, and recalled to those who admired them the palace and gardens of Armida. . . . The entire liberty, the gaiety of conversation, the absence of all ennui and con straint, might have made me believe, had I turned away my eyes from the imposing majesty of the Palace of Tzarskoie-Sielo, that I was in the country among the pleasantest of private people.^^. . M. de Cobenzel manifested his unquenchable gaiety ; M. Fitz-Herbert, a fine and finished wit; General Potemkin, an originality 198 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA that made him always new, even during his frequent moments of moroseness or dreaminess. The Empress chatted familiarly on all subjects, politics excepted ; she liked to hear amusing stories, and to tell them, and if by chance the conversation flagged, the chief equerry, Narych- kine, recalled the laughter and gaiety by his mad humour. Catherine worked almost all the morning, and we were all free to write, read, walk, or do whatever we felt inclined. / The dinner, very limited as to dishes and guests, was good, simple, without display ; the time after dinner was devoted to play and conversation. In the evening the Empress retired early, ana after that we met together, Cobenzel, Fitz- Herbert, and I, either in the room of one of our number, or in Prince Potemkin's.' Catherine rested in this pleasant retreat from the fatigues of her position, from those especially which came from the necessity of her presence in the court festivities and ceremonies. We owe our readers a few words on the celebrated soirees of the Hermitage. In the amplitude of its proportions, the magni ficence of its interior decoration, the palace thus called did not by any means answer to its name. A series of rooms and galleries led to a circular HOME LIFE 199 salle de spectacle, a reduced copy of the ancient theatre at Vicenza. The receptions were of three different kinds, the great receptions, the medium, and the small. To the first were ad mitted generally all the persons of distinction and the foreign ministers. Balls alternated with performances, in which all the famous artists took part : Sarti, Cimarosa, Paisiello conducted the orchestra ; Biotti, Puniani, Dietz, Lulli, Michel, displayed their talents on different instruments ; la Gabrielli, la Todi, the baritone Marchesi, the tenor Majorletti, sang ; in pantomime there were Pic, Rossi, Santini, Canucciani. After the concerts and Italian operas came the performances of Russian comedies and plays, with Volkof, Dmitrefski, Choumski, Kroutitski, Tchernikof, Sandounoff, la Trepolskaia. The French drama and opera also had their place, with Sedaine, Philidor, Gretry, whose works found elegant interpreters, such as the famous Aufresne. At the ball, each lady had two cavaliers, who supped with her.^\fter supper one more polonaise was danced, and the ball was over before ten. The medium receptions differed from the grand receptions merely by the smaller number of guests. Ouite different was the character of the small CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA receptions. As a rule no one was present except the members of the imperial family and some special friends carefully selected — a score of people in all. An invitation to a stranger was a mark of exceptional favour, to which the greatest value was attached. In the orchestra, when there was a play, as was often the case, there were sometimes only three or four picked musi cians, Dietz with his violin, Delfini with his violoncello, Cardon with his harp. After the play, every one did as he liked. In the rooms thrown open to the guests there was really no longer un soupgon dimpdratrice, as she is made to say to the Baron Grimm in a passage of his memoirs^ On the walls is a notice : it is forbidden, among other things, to rise before the sovereign, even if one is sitting down, and the Empress comes over, and chooses to enter into conversation while standing. It is forbidden to have an ill-tempered air, to exchange unkind words, to speak ill of any one whatever. It is forbidden to remember the quarrels or the friend ships that one may have out of doors : they must be left at the door, with sword and hat. It is forbidden also to lie and to talk idly. A fine of ten kopecks, which is received in a poor-box, is inflicted on those who break these rules. Bez- HOME LIFE borodko is appointed cashier/M.mong the habituds there is one who, by his constant blunders, con tinually has the cashier after him with his money box. One day when the bore has gone before the other guests, Bezborodko says to the Empress that she ought to refuse him admission to the Hermitage, otherwise he will ruin himself in fines. 'Let him be,' replies Catherine, 'after having passed the day in hearing your reports and those of your colleagues, I need some rest, and such idle talk is quite pleasant.' ' Then, Matouchka,' says Bezborodko, 'come and pay us a visit in the senate : you will get as much of it as ever you want.' Games are all the rage in these gatherings, and Catherine herself is the life and soul of the company, stirring up the gaiety of her guests, and authorising every liberty^' The forfeits are, to drink a glass of water at one draught, to recite a passage of the Tdldmachide of Trediakofski without yawning, etc. The evening ends with a game of cards. Often, in the middle of a rubber, the sovereign is interrupted to execute some forfeit. ' What must I do ? ' she asks meekly. 'Sit on the ground, Matouchka.' She obeys at once. Am that is far enough from the imaginary CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA orgies which haunted the minds of her contem poraries. In a way, it is true, Catherine afforded some excuse for suppositions of this kind, which have done some harm to her reputation. She had from the first, and she kept to the last, ways and manners which are unusual enough in sovereigns. In 1763 the Baron de Breteuil, just as he was leaving his post, received from her the following letter, the style of which might have surprised a diplomatist accustomed to the ceremonious forms in use in courts : — ' Monsieur le Baron de Breteuil will have the kindness to be at the cottage, on whose beauty he has promised to keep eternal secrecy, on Sunday at eleven o'clock in the morning, and if he will be so good, he will remain till after supper on the pretext of paying a visit to Count Orlof The note, without date or signature, was in the Empress's handwriting. The cottage referred to was a villa newly built in the neighbourhood of Moscow. Breteuil answered as follows : — 'The Baron de Breteuil renews his vows of secrecy in regard to the cottage, where he looks forward to the pleasure of being publicly admitted on Sunday at eleven o'clock. He will be there, in all respect and gratitude, and he will take advantage of the kind permission to remain all HOME LIFE day, but M. le Comte d' Orlof will excuse him from making the pretext of paying him a visit.' One would say that this was written at the dictation of the Baroness. But if she really saw anything dubious in the sovereign's invita tion, she was well deceived, and her husband well taken aback, when he found out the real cause of it. CHAPTER II FAMILY LIFE THE GRAND DUKE ' PAUL I Catherine did not show a very profound affec tion for her parents ; she seemed to forget that she had a brother ; she was on bad terms with her husband, if she had not even some share, direct or indirect, in his tragic end ; finally, her son, the only one of her legitimate children who survived her, had not much cause for gratitude to her, if even, as it has been supposed, she did not think of disinheriting him. These are facts. It has been inferred from this that she had no sort of family feeling, and that even the maternal feeling, found in the lowest of the low, and even among the animals, was alien to her cold and corrupt heart, depraved by ambition and by vice. These are questions to be considered. What were the relations of Catherine with her husband, we have already said. Her relations with the heir to the throne have been variously interpreted. Some have imagined them to have FAMILY LIFE— THE GRAND DUKE PAUL 205 been excellent up to the time of Paul's first marriage. From this moment the presence of a stranger may have exercised, in their regard, a jarring influence, such as one finds in the history of many families. Besides this, in the first year of this union, in 1774, a conspiracy is said to have been discovered, the aim of which was to raise the Grand Duke to the throne in place of his mother, and at the head of this plot was the new daughter-in-law of Catherine, the Grand Duchess Nathalie Aleksieievna, nde Prin cess of Darmstadt. A secretary of Count Panine, Bakounine, betrayed the secret to the Empress, who threw the list of conspirators in the fire : among the names she had found that of her Prime Minister, side by side with her former friend, Princess Dachkof. This story, which is founded merely on a family tradition, has been doubted by many. It raises, in fact, many objections. Plots, real or imagin ary, having for object the support of the incon testable rights of the son of Peter IIL, were frequent throughout the whole reign of Catherine. In his despatch of June 26, 1772, Count Solms notifies to Frederick the discovery of an intrigue of this kind set on foot by some officers of the Pr^obrajenski regiment. But he speaks also of 206 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA blows of the knout distributed, of noses and ears cut off. Such was the natural order of things. The fact admitted of an almost hostile tension between mother and son, in place of the former harmonious, if never very intimate and affec tionate, relations, another explanation has been given and another date attributed to this change of things. The tour that Paul wished to make in Europe, in company with his second wife, the Grand Duchess Maria of Wurtemberg, brought about the crisis. Having authorised this excur sion only against her will, Catherine wished her son, at all events, not to stop at Berlin. She was on the point of breaking with the court there. Paul took no heed of all that. He let himself be feted, flattered, and cajoled by Frederick, and when he made his appearance at Vienna, people were astonished to find that he knew nothing, or professed to know nothing, of the alliance which had already linked that court with his. He put himself forward everywhere as a severe critic of his mother's policy. At Florence, talking with Leopold, the brother of Joseph, he expressed himself in the most unguarded manner in reference to the principal assistants of Catherine, Prince Patiomkine, Bezborodko, Panine himself, declaring that they were all FAMILY LIFE— THE GRAND DUKE PAUL 207 without exception in the pay of the Emperor. ' I will stamp them all out,' he repeated wrath - fully. This second version seems to us as arbitrary as the first, and neither appears to have any foundation ; it , remains to be proved that at any period whatever Catherine treated her son better than she did after his marriage, or after the ' grand tour ' which separated them for a time. Doubtless, in her letters to Madame Bielke, which date from 1772, it pleases the sovereign to paint in the most agreeable colours the life that she leads at Tzarskoie, in company with Paul ; but we know already what Catherine's epistolary sincerity is worth. Doubtless also, in the course of the September of that year, the Prussian ambassador, Count Solms, mentions several times a revival of tender demonstrations of the Empress to the Grand Duke. ' She cannot make a step without having him with her,' he writes. But this is at the very height of the crisis which, in separating the sovereign from her first favourite, and thus putting her at variance with the powerful tribe of the Orlofs, causes her serious misgivings as to the security of her throne. ' I know on sure authority,' adds Solms, ' that the Grand Duke is not too sure 208 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA himself of the meaning of this excess of friend liness on the part of his mother.' And not without reason. About the same time, writing to her son, and beginning her letter twice over, Catherine first wrote these words : — ' It seems to me that you were either afflicted or sulky during the day ; both would distress me as a mother ; but as for the sulkiness, I confess I am not much concerned about that, either as mother or as Empress.' She tore up the page, and began again thus : — ' It seems to me that you were either afflicted or sulky during the day ; if you were in affliction, I should be distressed by it ; if it was sullenness, I leave you to imagine what attention I should pay to that.' But the first draft probably rendered her thought more exactly, and it does not indicate, to our view, very cordial relations. Catherine supposed that the affliction or sulkiness of the Grand Duke came from her refusal to admit him to her council, and this refusal was assuredly not in itself a proof of confidence or affection. As early as 1764 Berenger wrote from St. Peters burg to the Duke of Praslin — 'This young Prince gives evidence of dark and dangerous dispositions. It is known that FAMILY LIFE— THE GRAND DUKE PAUL 209 his mother does not love him, and that, since her accession, she shows -him none of the marks of tenderness that she showered upon him be fore. ... He asked, a few days ago [Berenger had this detail from one of the Grand Duke's valets de chambre\, why his father had died, and why the throne which belonged to him had been given to his mother. He added that when he was grown up, he would get at the bottom of all that. They say . that the child makes too many such remarks for them not to reach the ears of the Empress. Now, no one doubts that this Princess takes all possible precautions against such an event.' It is possible, however, that the tour under taken by Paul against the wish of his mother, and the attitude that he often assumed on that occasion, may have helped to bring about some ill-feeling on the part of the Empress, and to urge her forward on a path on which her ac cession to the throne, that is to say, properly speaking, her usurpation of the rights of her son, had made her enter. But the intimacy and affection had ceased before this. They were incompatible with the respective position of these two beings, one of whom had violently taken the place of the other. VOL. 11. o CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Had these affectionate feelings and relations ever existed? Could Catherine ever have had a mother's heart for the child who had been torn from her arms as soon as he was born, whom she had never nursed, whom she had never brought up, whom she had never even seen except at rare intervals ? Did she ever really shower upon him those caresses of which Beren ger speaks ? Perhaps, before she had become Empress, when the child, her son, might one day become her Emperor and her master. If there was a change in her demeanour, the event must have been simultaneous with that of July 5, 1762, as indeed the report of the French chargd- d'affaires clearly indicates, and the reason is sufficiently apparent. 11 We have already spoken several times of the tour of the Count and Countess du Nord. The departure, which took place on October 5, 1781, produced a great sensation at St. Petersburg. The people surrounded the carriage which bore the heir to the throne, with tears and sobs and every sign of the warmest affection. Some enthusiasts threw themselves under the wheels of the carriage to hinder it from advancing. This FAMILY LIFE— THE GRAND DUKE PAUL 211 alone might well have alarmed Catherine. She was, however, at first well pleased, rather than otherwise, by the homage with which Paul was greeted at Berlin. A conversation that she had with her son, after his return, changed her feelings on the subject. Then only she be thought herself that he had been made too much of by Frederick. As Paul made no disguise of his opinions and sympathies, she grew angry, declaring in her wrath that after she was dead ' Russia would become a Prussian province.' The Grand Duke's travels were in the strictest incognito. Their Highnesses refused even the apartments that had been prepared for them, putting up in furnished lodgings with all their suite, which must have been considerable, since it required sixty horses at every posting station. Paul and his wife consented, however, to be guests at Versailles for a few days, and their visit seems to have left a favourable impression. ' The Grand Duke,' wrote Marie Antoinette, the day after their departure, ' has the air of an ardent and impetuous man who holds himself in. . . . The King has not noticed that he professed ex travagant opinions.' There was a mythological and allegorical fHe at Trianon, where a young Hebe particularly charmed the august spectators. CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA It was — how can one record it without a pang ? — Madame Elizabeth ! The royal family wished also to make good the reputation of French hospitality. At Mouceaux (sic), in the gardens of the Due de Chartres, 'after having traversed a thousand winding byways, arched over with sycamores, lilac-trees, Italian poplars, and a thou sand shrubs of the Indies ; after having breathed the fresh air, and rested on plots of grass and wild thyme, visited rustic huts and crumbling Gothic manor-houses, the Comte and Comtesse du Nord partook of the simple repast of the labouring shepherds.' At Paris the passage of their Highnesses, coinciding with the effervescence of Russian sympathies that we have noted above, had almost the air of a triumphal progress. Everywhere agreeable surprises were in store for the visitors. At the Royal Library, a number of Russian books were taken down for the Grand Duke's benefit from the shelves, where no doubt they found few readers, and the librarian, Desolnais, called his attention to a volume that had served, said he, in the education of a prince whom Paris had long learned to admire, and was now learning to love. It was a manual composed for the use of Paul himself by the Archbishop Plato. Their FAMILY LIFE— THE GRAND DUKE PAUL 213 Highnesses did their utmost to repay all this courtesy. After having reviewed Marshal Biron's regiment of Gardes-francaises, the Grand Duchess sent to the marshal a gracious letter, enclosing ten bank-notes of 1200 francs, for the soldiers to drink the health of their chief. The parsimony, a forced parsimony indeed, of Paul in 1776 was still remembered at Berlin, where the Grand Duke had come to marry his second wife. Imperious orders from St. Petersburg had cut short his generous intentions. The proceeding was much criticised, even at Paris, and the present differ ence was all the more appreciated. There was, however, the painful incident of Clerisseau. Paul, naturally, was surrounded in the capital of arts and letters by the literary clique with which his mother was connected. He did not always give it satisfaction, or consider all its susceptibilities. But for the distance which separ ated Paris from St. Petersburg, Catherine herself might not have succeeded. Madame d'Ober- kirch relates this scene in her memoirs, much as follows. The scene took place at the house of M. de la Reyniere, now occupied by the Cercle de 1' Union Artistique. M. de la Reyniere was a wealthy fermier-gdndral, and his house, which was decorated by the best artists in Paris, 214 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Clerisseau at their head, was famed as one of the wonders of the city. Paul wished to see it. He had already been introduced to the irascible architect, and he had not been too attentive to him : so at least Clerisseau thought, and he had written a letter to Prince Bariatinski, the Grand Duke's aide-de-camp — a very dignified letter, according to Grimm — in which he had stated that he would acquaint the Empress with the reception that persons honoured by her esteem met with from her son. A few days after, the artist and the prince met in the dining-room of de la Reyniere's house, one of C16risseau's masterpieces. On entering, the Comte du Nord perceived a man who bowed without speaking. Paul returned the bow, but the man barred the way. ' What do you want, Monsieur ? ' ' You do not recognise me, Monseigneur? ' ' I recognise you perfectly ; you are the Sieur Clerisseau.' ' Why then do you not speak to me ? ' ' Because I have nothing to say.' ' Then you are going to be here as you were at home, Monseigneur, slight me, treat me as a stranger; I, the architect of the Empress, and in correspondence with her ! And I have written FAMIL Y LIFE— THE GRAND DUKE PA UL 215 to her, to complain of your unworthy treatment of me.' ' Write her also, then, that you are hindering me from passing, Monsieur. She will certainly thank you for it.' The version that Grimm gives of the incident, in his correspondence with Catherine, is quite different, and it seems to us more probable. It was Paul who first made overtures to Clerisseau, wishing to repair the wrongs he might have done him, showing himself most amiable, and recalling the flattering words that he had used on their first meeting. But Clerisseau cut short these tardy demonstrations — ' Monsieur le Comte, you may have intended to say all that to me, but I heard nothing of it.' 'You must have neither ears nor memory, then,' said Paul, with some heat. With this, some people coming up just then, the conversation ended. ' Never was I so uncivilly used,' said the Grand Duke, laughing, to those about him; 'it gave me quite a shock.' The Grand Duchess tried to smooth over matters ; but Clerisseau was unmanageable, and ended by becoming rude. The Princess having asked him to send her the plan and sketches of a salon that she had admired, he replied dryly — 216 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA ' I will send them to my august benefactress, where Madame la Comtesse can have them.' Catherine did not, in this circumstance, attempt to justify her architect against the heir to her throne; she knew too well the interests of her rank and dignity ; but the incident doubtless left an unpleasant impression on her mind : she was only too much disposed to think her son and heir a clumsy creature. The letters that she sent to the travellers, during their absence, were, however, always affectionately maternal. It would seem even as if this separation exercised a calming influence over her mind. When he was present, and by her side, Paul became a menace and a source of perpetual uneasiness. Had it not been publicly stated that she was only awaiting his coming of age to restore to him his own, that is to say, the place that she herself occupied ? in After his return these disagreements grew worse. Paul and his wife complained that the Empress took out of their hands the education of their children. At the time of the Crimean tour, Catherine had wished to take with her the little Grand Dukes Alexander and Constantine. This FAMILY LIFE— THE GRAND DUKE PAUL 217 time the parents' objections were so strong that she hesitated to go against them. But questions of policy played a considerable part in the quarrel, which grew worse from day to day. In July 1783 the Marquis de Verac, then French minister at St. Petersburg, wishing to prevent a conflict between Russia and Turkey, renewed the representations that the Court of Versailles never ceased to urge, and complained of the unfavour able, almost scornful, reception that was given them on the part of the Empress and her ministers ; he insisted in these terms on an antagonism in which he saw some hope for the future : ' The Grand Duke is entirely opposed to all this system of ideas ; this Prince, brought up in the wise principles of the late Count Panine, regards with mortal dissatisfaction the deplorable state to which the empire has come through the boundless prodigality of the Empress. He con siders the plan of campaign against the Turks a project likely to lead Russia to utter ruin, and he is personally much incensed against the Emperor, whom he regards as the prime mover in the matter.' When the war had broken out, Catherine objected to the Grand Duke's taking part in it. ' It would be a fresh inconvenience,' she wrote to 218 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Patiomkine. She allowed him to go to Finland, during the Swedish war ; but Knorring, who commanded the army in the field, declared after wards that he had been commanded not to communicate to his Highness any plan of opera tions. In 1789, when there was question of a rupture with Prussia, the situation of Paul assumed a certain likeness, irritating for Catherine, but still more threatening for him, with that occupied by Peter during the last years of Elizabeth's reign. Dark rumours were in the air. The famous Greek project of the Empress was yet another source of continual conflict : on the part of the Grand Duke it met with open opposition. Finally, in the course of the changes which came about from year to year in those who were about the Empress, Paul sometimes went so far as to forget his duty as a son, and, in return, the favourites, whether Patiomkine or Zoubof, did not feel obliged to be very respectful to his Highness. One day, at table, the Grand Duke having approved of an idea put forward by Zoubof, ' Have I said anything stupid ? ' said he. The young count was frequently in difficulties about money. In 1793, when Catherine was engaged in looking through the accounts of the FAMILY LIFE— THE GRAND DUKE PAUL 219 court banker, Sutherland, who had made some bad speculations, and was on the point of sus pending payment, her secretary, Dierjavine, comes, in his enumeration of the assets, to a sum due to the banker ' from a person in high position, but who has the misfortune not to be loved by the Empress.' Catherine was not long in dis covering who was meant. ' How absurd ! ' she cries ; ' what does he want with such sums ? ' Dierjavine ventures to observe that the late Prince Patiomkine had been accustomed to borrow much larger sums ; he points out some in Suther land's assets. The Empress pays no heed, and the examination of the accounts goes on. They come to another item of the ' person in high position.' ' Another !' cries Catherine, furiously. ' No wonder, after that, Sutherland became bankrupt ! ' Dierjavine thinks the occasion favourable to pay a bad turn to the new favourite, Plato Zoubof, by whom he does not consider himself sufficiently well paid. He turns to a long sum recently put to his account. The Empress, without replying, rings a bell. ' Is there any one in the secretary's room ? ' she asks. There is Vassili Stiepanovitch Popof. ' Send him in.' Popof enters. ' Sit down there, and do not leave me till the end of this report. This CA THERINE II. OF RUSSIA gentleman' (pointing to Dierjavine) 'wishes to come to blows with me, I think.' At this period the Grand Duke lives with his wife at Gatchina or Pavlovsk, entirely apart from his mother and also from his children, who are with her, and whom he sometimes does not see for months together. To see them he requires the permission of Count Saltykof, their governor. We have already spoken of the opinion, general enough during the last years of Catherine's reign, according to which she intended to disinherit her son. This measure was hoped for by a large number of persons. A manifesto deciding this important point was anxiously expected. It was thought that it would appear on January i, 1797. According to one version, the manifesto was already drawn up, and was intended to inaugurate constitutional government in Russia under the sceptre of Alexander, the character of Paul being utterly opposed to the adoption of this form of government. In the memoirs of Engelhardt, in a fragment of the memoirs of Dierjavine, which has been preserved, there is, on the other hand, some reference to a testament of the Empress, having the same object, except for the enigmatic and doubtful introduction of constitutionalism, so little in accord with the ideas then prevailing in FAMILY LIFE— THE GRAND. DUKE PAUL 221 the mind of Catherine. The Ode written by Dierjavine for the coronation of Alexander seems to allude to it, as well as a curious document which circulated after the death of the Empress under the title, Catherine II. in the Elysian Fields. The sovereign reproaches Bezborodko, to whom the testament in question was supposed to have been confided, with having inflicted the reign of Paul on her country. It is certain that in alluding, frequently enough, in her correspondence, ,to the future of Russia after her death. Catherine never speaks of the reign of her son. It is always Alexander whom she speaks of as her heir. According to certain authorities, she finally took stringent measures against the difficulties that she anticipated on the part of the natural heir. Mother and son now met only in official ceremonies. They exchanged ceremonious letters. During the very short visit of the Grand Duke to the army in Finland, where he soon discovered that he had nothing to do, the cor respondence is almost daily. It recalls a little that of the King of Spain with Maria of Neubourg, in the version that Victor Hugo has given of it. Here is a specimen : — ' My dear Mother, — The letter of your Imperial CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Majesty has caused me the greatest pleasure, and I am deeply touched by what is said in it. I beg her to accept the expression of my grati tude, and at the same time that of the respect and affection with which I am . . .' Here is Catherine's reply : — ' I have received, my dear son, your letter of the 5th, with the expression of your sentiments, to which mine respond. Good-bye. I hope you are well.' The letters are all after this fashion, almost without variation. IV What bears witness against Catherine in these unhappy events — the seamy side of the splen dours of the great reign— is the way in which she acted in regard to another son, in whom there was nothing to alarm her ambition or her responsibility as a sovereign. She had, as we know, a second son, a love-child, who was known as Bobrinski. Did she love him? It does not seem so. Did she look after his welfare? She gave him enough to live comfortably, to travel abroad, and even to commit some extravagances. He carried them to excess : she hears of it, and betrays an astonishing indifference on the subject. FAMILY LIFE— THE GRAND DUKE PAUL 223 'What,' she writes to Grimm, 'is this affair of Bobrinski ? The young man is singularly un concerned. ... If you could manage to find out the state of his affairs at Paris, you would oblige me. . . . However, he ought to be well able to pay his way ; he has 30,000 roubles a year.' Two years afterwards she writes — ' It is tiresome that M. Bobrinski will get into debt ; he knows the amount of his income, and is quite honest. Beyond that, he has nothing.' It is thus that she announces her resolution not to meet the debts of this son ; beyond the modest quota that she allows him, he and his creditors must not count upon her. And she keeps her word. At the end of 1787 young Bobrinski is in Paris, in the greatest distress, several million francs in arrears, besides the amount that he owes in London, whence he has just fled his creditors. For one thing, he has given the Marquis de Ferrieres a bill of credit for 1,400,000 francs. Catherine up to now has made no attempt to arrest this disordered career. She now makes up her mind to act ; she recalls the young man to Russia, and confines him to Revel, where she has all his movements carefully watched, without, however, caring to see him or 224 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA to know what becomes of him. As long as he leaves her in peace, and does not ask her for money, and she does not hear him referred to, she is quite satisfied. Nothing could be more definite than that. But is there no touch of nature in the heart of this insensible mother ? How can we maintain the contrary ? But how also can we affirm it ? We have seen her relations with her son. But now let us see her relations with her grand children. From 1779 onwards, every day at half- past ten, the little Alexander is brought to her. ' I have said it to you before and I say it to you again,' she writes to Grimm, ' I dote on the little monkey. . . . Every day we make new acquaint ances, that is to say that of every toy we make ten or twelve, and we try which of the two can best develop his talents. It is extraordinary how industrious we have become. . . . After dinner my little monkey comes back as often as he likes, and he spends three or four hours a day in my room.' The same year she begins to teach his ABC to 'Mr. Alexander, who cannot yet talk, and who is only a year and a half old.' As we have seen, she makes his clothes for him. ' This is how he has been dressed ever since he was six months old,' she says, when sending to Grimm FA MIL Y LIFE - THE GRA ND D UKE PAUL 225 the facsimile of a costume of her invention. ' All that is sewn together, and goes on at once, and fastens behind with four or five little hooks. . . . There is no ligature anywhere, and the child scarcely knows that he is being dressed : his arms and legs are put into the dress at once, and it is all done ; it is a stroke of genius on my part, this dress. The King of Sweden and the Prince of Prussia have demanded and received a pattern of the dress of Mr. Alexander.' Then come the inevitable anecdotes that we find in the letters of all mothers, in which are narrated day by day the great deeds of the infant prodigy, the clever sayings, the indications of intelligence, 'wonder ful for his age.' One day when the precious ' little monkey ' is ill and shivering with fever, Catherine finds him at the door of her room, wrapped up in a great cloak. She asks what that is for, and the child replies, ' It is a sentinel dying of cold.' One day he asks one of the Empress's femmes de chambre whom he is like. ' Your mother,' she replies ; ' you have all her features, her nose, her mouth.' 'No, not that; but my temper, my ways, what are they like ? ' ' Oh, in that you are more like grandmamma than any body.' Thereupon the little Grand Duke throws his arms round the old woman's neck, and kisses vol. 11. p 226 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA her effusively. ' That is what I wanted you to say ! ' This story is very significant in regard to the place that Paul and Catherine occupied respec tively in this family, in which the widow of Peter III. usurps all the supremacy. Read one more passage from a letter to Grimm, referring to the adored little being : 'He will, to my thinking, become a most wonderful personage indeed, provided the secondaterie does not hinder his progress.' Secondat, secondaterie, are words after the manner of Catherine, used by her to describe her son and her daughter-in-law, as well as the educational, political, and all kinds of ideas that prevail at Pavlovsk, and are in general entirely opposed to her own. The little Constantine does not at first get into the good graces of his grandmother to the same extent as his brother. Catherine finds him too frail, too delicate, for an Empress's grandson. ' As for the other,' she says, after having spoken enthusiastically of Alexander, ' I would not give ten sous for him ; I am very much mistaken if he is likely to live very long.' But by and by the younger wins his way. With time the child grows and becomes stronger, and, dreams of FAMIL Y LIFE— THE GRA ND D UKE PAUL 227 Byzantine sovereignty showing themselves on the horizon, the affection of Catherine awakens little by little for the nursling of the Greek Helen. Alas ! it must needs be said that her state policy plays its part, and even a main part, in this chapter of the great sovereign's history. Policy ! we are sure to find that wherever we follow Catherine: in her feelings as in her thoughts, in her likes as in her dislikes, and her family feelings themselves make no exception to the rule. It is there, to our mind, that we must seek the starting-point and the solution of all the doubts, all the enigmas, to which the study that this book is devoted to may give rise. Naturally, as we think, in this woman, who, in certain sides of her character and certain details of her conduct, deserves all reprobation, as on other sides she merits all the praise, the moral sensibility, without being of a high order, was neither absent, as some have fancied, nor yet deadened, nor vitiated and reduced to the level of the lowest instincts. Her heart was on a level with her mind, which, as we have intimated, never reached a very great elevation. She could love, but she subordinated love, as she subordinated everything else, to the motive force of her life, which was of exceptional CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA force and vigour : she lived, above all things, by and for politics. At one time she loved the handsome Orlof because he was handsome, but also because he declared that he would risk his life to give her a crown, and she believed him capable of carrying out his word. She was cold and even harsh towards Paul, a little because she had not had the leisure to develop the maternal sentiments, thwarted from the cradle, but very much because she saw in him a dangerous rival in the present, and a pitiful successor in the future. She manifested a passionate affection for the little Alexander under the influence of just opposite causes, in the same category of ideas and feelings. The letters that she wrote to her grandchildren when she was away from them, in 1783, during her stay in Finland, in 1785, when she spent some time in Moscow, and in 1787, during her Crimean tour, are full of freshness, of communi cative warmth, of loving abandonment. It was a great trial to her not to have them with her on the fairyland roads of Taurida. It was a reason of economy that decided her to cut short the endless negotiations, on this subject, between St. Petersburg and Pavlovsk : every day's delay cost her 12.000 roubles. One may judge from that FA MIL Y LIFE— THE GRAND D UKE\PA UL 229 what must have been the total expense of the tour, which all Europe looked on in wonderment. Catherine had the opportunity, in directing the education of Alexander and Constantine, of applying her own theories in the matter. Her success seems to have been doubtful. The sove reign was almost alone, it would seem, in being satisfied with the progress of her scholars. La Harpe, among others, did not share her opinion. He had often to complain of the bad instincts and defects that he found in the elder. He gives several unpleasant enough traits. In 1796 the visit of the young King of Sweden caused comparisons to be made, not to the advantage of the two boys. Catherine, however, did her best, not allowing her affection to hinder her from a sometimes necessary severity. One day she noticed that in changing the squad on guard under the windows of the palace the men were kept under arms longer than was needful : it was a sight intended for the little Grand Dukes. She immediately sent for their tutor, and reprimanded him severely. The service of the state, the military service in particular, was not made for the amusement of children. If the Grand Dukes complained, they were to be informed that grand mamma had forbidden it. This was an accidental CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA instance of a very wise principle. But perhaps the system as a whole was less wise. Catherine was much concerned, and she was the only one to concern herself, as to the marriage of her grandchildren. The parents were not even consulted. Paul was scarcely consulted, indeed, in regard to his own marriage. Eleven German princesses were successively brought to Russia by the sovereign, solicitous as to the well-being of her son and her grandchildren : three Princesses of Darmstadt, three Princesses of Wurtemberg, two Princesses of Baden, and three Princesses of Coburg. Choice was to be made from the lot. The Princesses of Wurtemberg only went as far as Berlin, Frederick having insisted on Paul being sufficiently gallant to come half way to meet his fiancde. It was Prince Henry of Prussia, who was at St. Petersburg in 1776, who arranged the marriage. The eldest of the Princesses was already promised to the Prince of Darmstadt, but it was understood that he would give her up if, as Prince Henry wrote to his brother, ' he had the least good feeling,' and did not desire to trouble the happiness of two states.' The Prince of Darmstadt did indeed prove his ' good feeling.' Being deprived of the eldest, he turned his attention to the younger, 'because, at bottom, FAMILY LIFE— THE GRAND DUKE PAUL 231 that came to the same thing.' Besides, as Frederick gave him to understand, the father of the Princess had not waited to consult him before ' playing for the biggest stake that presented itself to his daughter.' He had had no difficulty beyond that of finding a Lutheran minister suf ficiently ' enlightened ' to make the future Grand Duchess understand that she would please God by changing her religion. But, as the court of St. Petersburg had sent 40,000 roubles for the cost of the Princess's journey, 'a real help,' as their mother said, to the rickety finances of the family, that difficulty was soon overcome. Two years later, the Princesses of Darmstadt went all the way to St. Petersburg. Then came the turn of the two Princesses of Baden-Durlach. As they were orphans, the Countess Chouvalof, widow of the author of the Epitre a Ninon, was sent to bring them over ; and she was accom panied by a certain Strekalof, who appears to have conducted himself like a Cossack who had been ordered to carry off girls into Georgia. But the German courts were not susceptible at this time. On the arrival of the Princesses, the Empress asked to see their trousseau. Having examined it, she said, ' My friends, I was not so rich as you when I arrived in Russia.' CA THERINE II. OF RUSSIA The elder remained in Russia, and married Alexander ; the younger returned to her own country : Constantine would not have her. She was only fourteen, and not yet developed. Later on she married the King of Sweden. The files which were given on the occasion of the marriage of Alexander mark the last brilliant and happy moment of the reign of Catherine. The following epithalamium was composed : — ' Ni la reine de Thebes au milieu de ses filles, Ni Louis et ses fils assemblant les families, Ne formerent jamais un cercle si pompeux. Trois generations vont fieurir devant elle, Et c'est Elle toujours qui charmera nos yeux. Fiere d'etre leur mere et non d'etre immortelle : Telle est Junon parmi les dieux ! ' The year after, the arrival of the Princess of Saxe-Coburg with her three daughters produced less effect. This time Catherine considered that the belongings of their Highnesses were quite too mean. Her own penury at the time of her arrival in Russia was exceeded. The wardrobe of the family had to be renewed before it was presentable to the court, and Constantine, in spite of all, was still unsatisfied. He ended, however, by deciding on the youngest. Catherine, then, resolutely disregarded certain family affections and responsibilities imposed on FAMILY LIFE— THE GRAND DUKE PAUL 233 her both by nature and the proprieties ; she entered into others with at least equal intensity. We have pointed out the most admissible solu tion, in our eyes, of this moral problem ; we do not profess that it answers every objection. But, with regard to the great figures of history, there are many of these insoluble enigmas, in which no one can say the last word. CHAPTER III PRIVATE life FAVOURITISM I There is a whole legend in regard to the love affairs of Catherine. We shall try to replace it by a few pages of history. It is certainly not in the character of historian that Laveaux has re corded Catherine's first taste of intrigue, at a time when she had not yet arrived in Russia. Even at Stettin she would have had as lover a Count B., who imagined that he was marrying her, when leading one of her friends to the altar. It is an absurd fabrication. The small courts of Germany were certainly not temples of virtue ; nevertheless, at the age of fourteen, princesses were not exactly on the streets. Afterwards, at Moscow and at St. Petersburg, Laveaux shows us Catherine abandoning herself to the first comer, in the house of a Countess J., where she had in numerable lovers, who had no idea who she was. Saltykof gives place to a Venetian actor named Dalolio, who, in turn, arranges new rendezvous for 234 PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 235 his mistress of a day in the house of Ielaguine. In all this Laveaux echoes mere on dits without the slightest shadow of proof. Sabatier de Cabre is a witness really well informed and really serious, and one, too, who cannot be suspected of partiality. Now, in a memorandum drawn up by him in 1772, we read : ' Though not free from reproach, she is far from the excess of which she has been accused ; nothing has been proved beyond the three known connections — with M. Saltykof, the King of Poland, and Count Orlof On arriving in Russia, Catherine finds a court and society, we dare not say more debauched than those of the other great European centres, but at least equally so, and, to crown it all, a form of regal debauchery, similar also, though with an inversion of roles, to the examples afforded elsewhere by the morals of the time, by French royalty among others. This is favouritism. Since the death of Peter I. the throne of Russia has been constantly occupied by women ; they have lovers, as Louis XV. has mistresses, and, when the imperial lover is called Biron, he is as powerful in Russia as a royal mistress, when she is called Pompadour, can be in France. As Louis XIV. married Madame de Maintenon, so Elizabeth marries Razoumofski. He is only the 236 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA son of a little Russian peasant, once choir-boy in the imperial chapel ; but Scarron's widow is of no very illustrious line. Choubine, who had preceded Razoumofski, was a mere soldier in the Guards : he was at all events the equivalent of the du Barry. And, going back a little further, when, by the cradle of Louis XIV., royalty had provisionally fallen to the female line, the presence of Signor Mazarini on the steps of the throne must have seemed not less extraordinary to the people who are easily astonished than, a hundred and fifty years later, that of Patiomkine. Need one even, to parallel the favourites of Catherine, go back so far ? Struensee, Godoy, Lord Acton, are contemporaries. Favouritism in Russia is what it is or has been elsewhere, allowing for the difference of scale. It is just this which gives it, under the reign of Catherine, a place apart. This time it is a woman who has the gift of going to extremes in everything. She has favourites, as Elizabeth and Anne have had ; but urged by her tempera ment, her character, her inclination to do things grandly, she gives unparalleled proportions to this usual, traditional order or disorder of things. Anne merely made Biihren the groom a Duke of Courland ; Catherine makes Poniatowski King of PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 237 Poland. Elizabeth was content with two ad mitted favourites, Razoumofski and Chouvalof; Catherine has them by dozens. Nor is this all. Her mind is not only of vast reach, scorning the ordinary limits, passionately desirous of what lies beyond ; it is also, and especially, imperious, absolute, disregardful of established rules, but readily turning into rule or law the inspiration of the moment, will or caprice. With Anne and Elizabeth, favouritism is a mere caprice ; with Catherine it becomes almost an institution of state. It is only gradually, however, that things reach this height. Up to 1772 Catherine is merely a sovereign who takes her pleasures as all those who preceded her on the same throne have done. Her caprices are talked of just as were those of Elizabeth, in the most unconcerned way.. Writ ing to Frederick, the Comte de Solms does, it is true, a propos of Gregory Orlof, make this observation, that ' one might find to-day artisans and lackeys who have been seated with him at the same table ' ; but he adds, ' One is so ac customed to favouritism in Russia, so little sur prised at any rapid ascent, that one can but applaud the choice of a young man who is mild and polished in his manners, who betrays neither pride nor vanity, who lives with his old acquaint- 238 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA ances on the same terms of familiarity, and never loses sight of them in the crowd, avoiding mixing himself up in affairs, except sometimes to recom mend a friend.' Gregory Orlof, it is true, does not long content himself, or rather Catherine is not contented on his behalf, with this modest and retiring part, and the Comte de Solms writes later on : ' Her Majesty's passion having in creased, she has wished to bring Orlof into affairs. She has put him into the commissions established for the reform of government.' And it is then, if we may believe the Prussian am bassador, that discontent breaks out. The hetman Razoumofski, Count Boutourline, both generals aides-de-camp, do not willingly suffer that a man who has been so far below them, just before, should now become their equal. Other lords, princes, and generals are scandal ised at being obliged to wait in the Sieur Orlof's antechamber, to be admitted to his lever. Count Cheremetief, the high chamberlain, one of the first and wealthiest lords of the land, as well as all whom their offices oblige to accompany the Empress's carriage on horseback, see with dis satisfaction the favourite seated in the coach beside their sovereign, while they trot by at the side. PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 239 But that is an old tale, and those of the great Russian lords who remember the favouritism of Biron under the reign of the Empress Anne, the Bironovchtchina, as the detested period has been called, must find the present state of things very acceptable in comparison, especially as Gregory Orlof rarely shows much inclination to avail him self of the somewhat forced part that the loving attentions of Catherine impose upon him in the government of the country. His ambitious fits are few and far between. Generally, as we have pointed out, he merely obeys the exigencies of the sovereign in this respect, and with a con strained and unwilling air. He is backward and retiring, a lover of voluptuous ease, careless and inoffensive. On the giddy heights, in the intoxi cating atmosphere, where the stroke of fortune has suddenly raised him, he lives in a half dream, and a day comes when his reason gives way altogether, sinking into the black abyss of madness. With him the weakness of Catherine has an excuse, a defence ; the man has risked his life for her, the man has given her a crown, and she loves him, or imagines she loves him, with a love not only of the senses. Separated from him, she will suffer in all his sufferings, and at his death 240 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA she will shed real tears, tears coming from the heart. The scandal really commences only after the disgrace of this first favourite. With Vassiltch- kof, in 1772, it is the mere lust of the flesh, gross and shameless. With Patiomkine, in 1774, it is the division of power with mere chance lovers that enters into the history of the reign. Then comes the long procession of passing favours : in June 1778 the Englishman Harris announces the elevation of Korssakof; in August, he speaks of competitors who are already canvassing his suc cession, some supported by Patiomkine, others by Panine and Orlof acting in concert ; in Sep tember, it is a certain Strahof, ' a low buffoon,' who seems to win the day; four months after, it is a major of the Siemionofski Guards, a certain Levachof, a young man protected by the Countess Bruce, Svie'ikofski, stabs himself in despair at seeing a rival preferred to himself. Then Korssakof seems once more to gain the upper hand. He struggles with a new com petitor, Stianof, then is blotted out entirely by Lanskoi, who is replaced by Mamonof, who struggles in turn with Miloradovitch and Mik- lachefski ; and so on, and so on. It is the rising of a tide that is to go on for ever; in 1792, at PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 24 1 sixty-three years of age, Catherine begins again with Plato Zoubof, and probably also with his brother, the same old story that has been gone over with twenty predecessors. Is it, nevertheless, even in this last descent into nameless depths, sheer shameless sensuality on her part ? and is her reason, the reason of a woman of genius, carried away, along with her modesty and her dignity, by the impetuous current which bears her forward ? In our belief, no. A phenomenon of another order is to be met with, raising the old and ever new problem which, now once more, is being passionately discussed. The question in regard to Catherine and her favourites is the broad question of 'sexuality,' from the material and moral point of view, and this question resolves itself, we can almost say, in the clear light of historical experiences. Here is an exceptional woman, exceptionally endowed with aptitudes and energies, both intellectual and moral, even physical, exceptionally exempt also from the bondage common to her sex. She has all liberty, all independence, and all power, an absolute power. How does she make use of it ? No, it is not alone the imperious and unwearying appeal of the senses that throws her, now into the arms of a Zoubof, now into the arms of a VOL. 11. Q 242 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Patiomkine. Another need, another imperative demand, comes into play, by its side, in the amorous Odyssey whose changing fortunes we are about to sketch. And in the first place, whatever may be the energy of her character, the firmness of her mind, and the good opinion that she has of her own abilities, Catherine does not profess that they can suffice to themselves and to her for the accomplishment of her task ; she feels the need of support from a virile mind and re solution, however inferior these may be to hers in actual value. And she proves this necessity ! When she writes to Patiomkine that without him ' she is without arms,' it is not a mere phrase. In 1788, when the favourite is in the Crimea, the letters that her confidential agent, Garnofski, sends to him from St. Petersburg are full of pressing objurgations, showing the urgent need of his return, as much on account of the disorder into which his absence has thrown affairs, as of the state in which the Empress herself is, 'de jected, subject to constant terrors, and vacillating from lack of support.' And it is here, too, that the part played in history by the- conqueror of the Crimea and his fellows differs from the ex amples given at the same time, at the other end of Europe, by feminine favouritism : Louis XV. PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 243 simply endures the influence of his mistresses and their intervention in affairs of government : Catherine encourages and demands it. Nor is this all. Lanskoi, Zoubof, are twenty- two when they succeed to the place of Patiom kine. Now Nicholas Saltykof, who retains his freedom of speech with the Empress, expressing his astonishment at a choice so utterly out of keeping with the age of the sovereign, she makes this reply, which may perhaps cause a smile, but which contains a characteristic trait of the ' eternal feminine ' : ' Well ! I am serving the empire in the education of such capable young men.' And she believes it! In her anxiety to initiate these young ' scholars ' of a particular kind into the handling of the great interests of the state, there is really a sort of maternity. And it is thus that in her the irremediable weaknesses of a woman's nature join with her highest vocation in necessi tating the presence and assistance of the male, near this proud and headstrong female autocrat. Naturally, — for without this Catherine would not be herself— political calculation has its share in this particular complication of her existence, strange as it may seem to say so. The statement is verified by the facts, and, so fantastic as a whole is the fortune of this great handler of men, 244 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA the facts decide in her favour even on this point. Her intentions, extravagant as they may seem, are not entirely unjustified ; ' educated ' by her, trained, rough-hewn, raised from step to step, rapidly it is true, in the hierarchy of high civil and military functions, Patiomkine finally cuts a certain figure as all-powerful minister. When a whim of the sovereign installs him for a few months in the special suite of rooms communi cating with the Empress's by an inner staircar Zovitch is merely a major in the Hussars. comes afterwards to fill an important placy history of national education. We areX venting : this favourite was the first to conct. of a military school modelled on the foreign establishments of the kind. At Chklof, a magni ficent estate near Mohilef, which was given him as a residence after his disgrace, a school founded by him for the children of poor gentle-folk served as nucleus for the establishment of the Corps de Cadets of Moscow, now the principal military gymnasium of the city. Doubtless, such miracles came about through a peculiar concourse of circumstances presiding over the material and moral development of the great empire, become so entirely her own. But the complete history of her life is unintelligible ; PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 245 indeed, none such is possible, when it is not seen in this light. With Zovitch, Patiomkine, Mamonof, and ten others, the court of Catherine is quite that of Gerolstein, but a Gerolstein in which the comic, the grotesque, and the extravagant com bine with serious elements, which make of this amalgam one of the most singular pages in the annals of the world. The Russia of to-day is still a unique country, existing, so to speak, on the verge of the European community ; and Catherine was also a most extraordinary woman. These two conditions were required in order that it might be possible for operatic heroes to thus enact by her side, on one of the great stages of the universe, the great parts of the human drama. But these conditions being realised, and the history of the Russia of that day being thus played out amid pantomime scenery, it would be idle to try to explain it on the ordinary lines of analysis, which belong to the ordinary run of things. Lastly, from a final point of view, favouritism such as Catherine practised was by no means the reign of sensuality pure and simple, blindly reaching after ever new pleasures. There was method in the madness of Hamlet; and in the veins of Catherine there was a little Danish blood. 246 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA As we have said, she made of favouritism an institution. n We read, under date September 17, 1778, the following lines in the despatch of the day sent from St. Petersburg to the Comte de Vergennes by M. de Corberon : — ' We may observe in Russia a sort of inter regnum in affairs, caused by the displacement of one favourite and the installation of his successor. This event eclipses everything else. On it hang all the interests of a certain side of things, and even the cabinet ministers, succumbing to the general influence, suspend their operations until the choice has been made, and things fall back into the accustomed groove, and the machine is once more in proper order.' All this is an essential part of the machinery of government, and, this once lacking, everything comes to a dead stop. The interregnums are, however, as a rule of very short duration. Only one lasts for several months, between the death of Lanskoi (1784) and the succession of Iermolof. Generally it is a matter of twenty-four hours, and the slightest ministerial crisis is a much more serious inconvenience to-day. There is no lack PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 247 of candidates. The place is good, and those whose ambition it tempts are legion. In the regiments of the Guards, the traditional home of vremienchtchiks (favourites), there are always two or three handsome officers who turn their eyes in the direction of the imperial palace with a hope and longing more or less concealed. From time to time one of them makes his appearance at court, introduced by some great personage, who tries his chance of making a ' creature ' for him self, and in a post which is the source of all riches and honours. In 1774 a nephew of Count Zahar Tchernichef, a Prince Kantemir, young, dissolute, deep in debt, beau garpon, prowls for some weeks around the Empress. Twice, pretending to have lost his way, he reaches the private apartments of the Empress. The third time, he finds her, falls on his knees, and begs her to use him as she will. She rings, he is seized, put in a kibitka, and sent back to his uncle, who is advised to teach his nephew a little wisdom. Catherine is indulgent for this kind of folly. Patiomkine, more for tunate, makes his way by a bold stroke almost exactly similar. In general, however, this post, so much sought after, is the price of some intriguing. After 1 776 it is Patiomkine, now honorary favourite, who brings forward deputies discovered, trained, 248 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA and managed by him, and offers them to the choice of the sovereign. But both they and he have no easy task to keep the position, once attained : an absence, an illness, a momentary default, are enough to ruin all their chances. The very name, so expressive in Russian (vremia means time, moment ; vremienchtchik, the man of the moment) tells the chosen ones that the favour is fleeting. In 1772 it is at Fokchany, where he has gone to negotiate peace with Turkey, that Gregory Orlof learns of the installation of Vassil- tchikof in the place that he has imprudently quitted. He sets out at full speed, covers 2000 miles without stopping, travelling post, without sleep, almost without food, in order to reach the capital as quickly as he can. In spite of all, he arrives too late. In L764, Lanskoi, fallen ill, has recourse to artificial stimulants, which irreparably ruin his health. Sometimes, too, on the height by the throne, reached at a bound, these spoilt children of fate grow giddy : Zovitch thinks he may even defy her who has raised him from nothingness. Mamonof even imagines that he can share her favour with a court lady, for whom he sighs. It is over in an instant : at an evening reception, it is noticed that the Empress has gazed attentively at some obscure lieutenant, PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 249 presented but just before, or lost sight of till then among the crowd of courtiers ; next day, it is reported that he has been appointed aide-de camp to her Majesty. What that means is well known. Next day he finds himself in the special suite of rooms, in which the abode of the favourite is as brief as, in our days, are those of the heads of departments in the ministerial quarters. The rooms are already vacated, and everything is pre pared for the new-comer. All imaginable comfort and luxury, a splendidly appointed house, await him ; and, on opening a drawer, he finds a hundred thousand roubles (about 500,000 francs), the usual first gift, a foretaste of Pactolus. That evening, before the assembled court, the Empress appears, leaning familiarly on his arm, and on the stroke of ten, as she retires, the new favourite follows her. He will never leave the palace except at the side of his august mistress. From this moment he is a bird in a cage. The cage is fine, but it is carefully guarded : the Empress is on her guard against accidents, such as the generally far from reassuring antecedents of the chosen ones might reasonably lead her to fear. And it is for this reason, among others, that we can give no credit to the stories that represent the 250 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA favours of Catherine as shared by casual comers and goers. No doubt the place to which Patiom kine, Lanskoi, and so many others have found their way is not an inviolate sanctuary ; still, it is by no means accessible to the first comer. At the outset of her reign, Catherine certainly committed some imprudences, which caused her no little inconvenience. In 1762 an officer of the name of Hrastof, charged with the inventory of the wardrobe of the late Empress Elizabeth, was accused of making away with 200,000 roubles'-worth. A woman had been seen wear ing jewels that had belonged to the deceased sovereign. She was recognised as one of the innumerable mistresses of the favourite, Gregory Orlof, who probably shared the fair lady's favours with Hrastof. Now, the latter, according to the report of the French charge"- d'affaires Berenger, had been living for some time in considerable intimacy with the new Czarina. Since then, Catherine has put all that in order : the favourite is a person whose slightest move ments are subjected to an invariable routine and a minute scrutiny. He pays no visits, accepts no invitations. Once only was Mamonof authorised to accept a dinner, to which he had been invited by the Comte de Segur. Even then Catherine PRI VA TE L IFF— FA VO URITISM 2 5 1 became uneasy, and the French minister and his guests, on rising from table, see the Empress's coach under the windows : it goes slowly back ward and forward, with a persistence which betrays all the distress of the momentarily aban doned lover. A year later, the vremienchtchik nearly loses his place through a very natural and a very innocent infraction of the severe discipline to which he is subjected. On his birthday the Czarina has authorised him to pre sent her with a pair of earrings, which she her self has purchased for the sum of 30,000 roubles. The Grand Duchess sees the earrings and admires them greatly : upon which Catherine makes her a present of them. She puts them on, and next day she summons Mamonof to her, to thank him for having, however indirectly, contributed to this unexpected liberality. He is on the point of going, considering himself bound to obey a command from one so high in position ; but the Empress, on finding it out, falls into a violent rage ; she apostrophises him in violent terms, and sends to the Grand Duchess the most severe of reprimands : let her take care never to do it again ! Paul thinks to make himself agreeable by sending to the favourite a snuff-box set with diamonds ; Catherine allows CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Mamonof to go and thank the Grand Duke, but not by himself: she designates the particular person who is to accompany him. Paul refuses the visit. We must add that, on their side, the favourites do their best to guard against the danger of an unfaithfulness, even accidental, which would put them into competition with a rival perhaps capable of supplanting them. Their power, and it is great, is employed in a vigilance not less active than that of Catherine herself. So long as Patiomkine is in favour, and he is in favour, 'honorary' after a certain time, for fifteen years, from 1774 to 1789, his imperious will raises an insurmountable barrier against every caprice that he does not choose to sanction. He can even, at need, use violence to her who, in giving her self to him, has found a master indeed. Catherine's choice, it should be noted, falls, without exception, on men in the prime of life, and, for the most part, of Herculean build. As she grows older, she chooses them younger and younger. Of the two brothers Zoubof, one was twenty-two and the other eighteen at the time when she was first attracted by them. We know the age of Lanskoi, and the circumstances of his premature end. PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 2 5 3 What was the actual number of favourites, from the day of Catherine's accession to the day of her death ? It is not easy to say with absolute precision. Only ten officially occupied the post, with all the privileges and responsibilities of the post: Gregory Orlof, from 1762 to 1772 ; Vas- siltchikof, from 1772 to 1774; Patiomkine, from 1774 to 1776; Zavadofski, from 1776 to 1777; Zovitch, from 1777 to 1778; Korssakof, from 1778 to 1780; Lanskoi, from 1780 to 1784; Iermolof, from 1784 to 1785; Mamonof, from 1785 to 1789; Zoubof, from 1789 to 1796. But at the time when Korssakof was in favour, a crisis came about which called forth several aspirants, and brought at least one of them, Strahof, very much into the good graces of the sovereign. Strahof never occupied the special apartments of the favourite ; it is almost certain, however, that he took the place, for a short time, of the official favourite. Very likely something similar happened on various occasions. On visit ing the Winter Palace, shortly before the death of Catherine, a traveller was particularly struck by the decoration of two little rooms close to the Empress's bedroom : the walls of one of these rooms were completely covered with minia tures of great price, set in gold, and representing 254 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA different lascivious scenes ; the other room was similarly decorated, but the miniatures were por traits, portraits of men whom Catherine had known or loved. Among these men, some showed themselves singularly ungrateful for the excess of favours which Catherine heaped indiscriminately upon them all. She herself behaved well to every one of them, and not one, even of those who were unfaithful to her, had to suffer the weight of her wrath and vengeance. For she was betrayed and abandoned like the most vulgar of mistresses : all her power, all her fascination, and the im mensity of the price set on her favour, could not shield her from the mishaps that have tortured the hearts of empresses and of grisettes alike since the beginning of the world. In 1780 she sur prises Korssakof in the arms of the Countess Bruce. In 1789 it is Mamonof who gives her up to marry 2.freiline. Taking everything into con sideration, it is she who was the least changeable. Referring to the departure of Mamonof, simply sent to Moscow with his lady, with whom he is soon in disagreement, the Comte de Segur wrote in a despatch to the Comte de Montmorin ' One can shut one's eyes indulgently on the errors of a woman who is a great man, when she PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 255 shows, even in her weaknesses, such mastery over herself, such mercy, and such magnanimity. It is rarely that one finds in union absolute power, jealousy, and moderation, and such a character could only be condemned by a man without a heart, or a prince without a weakness.' Perhaps the Comte de Segur was too in dulgent. Perhaps, too, Saint- Beuve was not sufficiently so, when he observed that Catherine's way of treating her lovers, when she got tired of them, so different from that of Elizabeth of England and Christina of Sweden, really told against her. That she should load them with gifts, instead of having them assassinated, ' is too much, betrays too openly the scorn that she has of men and of nations.' There is, at all events, an error of fact in this severe judgment : Catherine was not tired of either Korssakof or Mamonof when she learned how they had deceived her. She clung to them still, to the latter especially, and her pride was not alone in suffering from the disgrace that they inflicted upon her. Her weaknesses were often, too often, those of a woman who takes her pleasure where she finds it ; but the English statesman who wrote ' she was a stranger to love,' understood very little, to our mind, of the psychology of a woman. 256 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA III Before making up her mind to abandon Gregory Orlof, Catherine endured from him what few women would have endured. In 1765, seven years before the rupture, Berenger writes from St. Petersburg to the Due de Praslin : — 'This Russian openly violates the laws of love in regard to the Empress. He has mis tresses in town, who, far from calling down the indignation of the sovereign through their com plaisance to Orlof, seem, on the contrary, to gain her favour by it. The senator, Mouravief who had found his wife with him, attempted to make a sensation by demanding a separation : the Empress appeased him by giving him some land in Livonia.' But at last things get to such a pitch that Catherine can endure it no longer, and she profits by the absence of the favourite to break her chain. At the moment when Orlof, travelling post, is coming to reclaim his rights, he is stopped by command a few versts from St. Petersburg, and banished to his estates. But he will not admit that he is beaten; now suppliant, now menacing, he begs to be allowed to see the sovereign again, if only for a moment. She has PRIVA TE LIFE- FA VO URITISM 257 only to say the word to be rid for ever of his importunities : Patiomkine is already at hand, and he would willingly make away with all the Orlofs at once. But this word is never said. She parleys, comes to an agreement, and finally sends to the lover, — how lightly punished for a part that might justify quite other measures ! — a plan of agreement which is a very poem of supreme tenderness of heart ; the past forgotten, an appeal to the reason of the guilty one that painful mutual explanations may be spared, the necessity of separation for a time, indicated how mildly, almost imploringly — nothing is wanting. He is to take leave of absence, to settle at Moscow, or on his estates, or elsewhere, if he will. His allowance of 150,000 roubles a year will be con tinued, and he will receive 100,000 roubles in addition, to furnish a house. Meanwhile he may make use of any of the Empress's houses near Moscow, use the court equipages as before, and keep the servants in the imperial livery. Catherine remembers that she has promised him 4000 peasants for the victory of Tchesme, in which it happens he took no part ; she adds 6000 more, whom he can pick out as he likes, in any of the domains of the crown. And as if she were afraid of not doing enough for him, she multiplies VOL. II. R 258 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA the proofs of her munificence : now a silver service, and then another ' for ordinary use,' and then a house at the Troitskaia Pristagne, furni ture, and everything that is found in the apart ments that had belonged to the favourite in the imperial palace, the value of which escapes her reckoning. In return, Catherine exacts only a year's absence. At the end of a year the ex- favourite will be better able to realise the situa tion. As for Catherine, ' she will never forget all that she owes to the family of Gregory Orlof, nor the talents with which he is personally endowed, and how useful they may be to the nation.' She desires only 'a mutual repose, which she will do her best to preserve.' It may be that in this way of accommodating things there is a little fear of what might be the result of hostility on the part of a family to which she herself has given such power in her empire ; but is there not also a genuine tenderness? Eleven years later, on hearing of the ex-favourite's death, Catherine wrote — ' The loss of Prince Orlof put me into a fever, with such delirium during the night, that I had to be bled.' It is in June 1783 that she hears the fatal news, and two months after, on her way to PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 1 59 Frederikshamn to meet the King of Sweden, she stipulates beforehand that he will not speak to her of this catastrophe, which still moves her to the very depths of her being. She is the first to speak of it, with an effort to conceal the agitation which so distant a past never fails to awaken in her mind. Nevertheless, she has found several successors to the lover whom she had replaced even before his death. Is it a mere infatuation, as Grimm at first supposes, which, in 1778, throws her into the arms of Korssakof? ' Infatuated ? infatuated ? ' she replies to her confidant. ' Do you not know that this term is out of place in speaking of Pyrrhus, King of Epirus' (the name she gives to the new favourite), 'a peril to painters, a despair to sculptors ? It is the admiration, sir, it is the enthusiasm, that the masterpieces of nature inspire ! Things of beauty fall and are dashed to pieces like idols before the ark of the Lord, before the character of this mighty man. Never does Pyrrhus make a move ment which is not either noble or graceful. He is radiant as the sun, he radiates light. All that is not effeminate, but male, all that one would have it : in a word, it is Pyrrhus, King of Epirus. It is all in harmony ; nothing is out of place : it is the effect of a mingling of the priceless gifts 26o CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA of nature; art is not absent, but artifice is a thousand leagues away.' We may admit that the sentiment which in spires this language in her is neither very deep nor very delicate. And indeed Korssakof is a mere hector. But take another actor in this drama of passion, Patiomkine, the man of genius, and read what follows. It is a letter from the favourite, written after a lover's quarrel of a few days' duration. Catherine replies in the margin, point by point. A sort of treaty of eternal peace and love is thus signed and sealed by the re conciled lovers : — In Patiomkine' s handwriting — ' Permit me, dear love, to tell you how I think our quarrel will end. Do not be surprised that I am concerned in regard to our love. Besides the number less favours you have showered upon me, you have also given me a place in your heart. I would be there alone, and above all who have gone before, for none has loved you as I love you. And as I am In Catherine 's ' The sooner the better. Do not be concerned. Hand washes hand. Sure and firm. He is and will be. I see and believe it. I rejoice at it. PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 26 1 the work of your hands, I That is my greatest joy. would find rest in you also ; I would have you delight That will come of itself. in doing me kindness; I would have you toil for Let calm return to your my happiness, and find in mind, and your feelings it a solace from the serious have free course ; they are tasks that are laid upon loving, and will find the you by your high position, best way themselves. End Amen.' of the quarrel. Amen.' This is no commonplace exchange of vows, and the two beings who, placed at the summit of human greatness, speak of their love in these terms are no vulgar debauchees. All the dreamy, troubled, and imperious disposition of Patiomkine manifests itself in these lines, as does the tempera ment, at once practical and exalted, of Catherine. It is by her judgment that the sovereign generally rules the favourite, it is by his ardour that he often carries her away. A great part of their correspondence has been published. There never was such a correspondence between two persons so linked by a common destiny. The turns of phrase generally employed by Catherine, especially during the early years of their connection, could not be paralleled, perhaps, in their excessive familiarity, in the correspondence of no matter what jeune galante of the time. We will not 262 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA dwell on, ' I embrace you a thousand times, my friend,' ' Forgive me if I am troubling you, my heart,' 'Do you see, my soul?' little as one expects to find these tender expressions from the hand of an Empress. But here is a note which ends, ' Good-bye, my bow-wow.' ' Good-bye, my gold pheasant,' we read elsewhere. Or again, ' Good-bye, papa.' There are frequent squabbles : Patiomkine has a troublesome disposition, and is sulky or furious at the least excuse. She writes to him thus : ' If you are not more amiable to-day than you were yesterday, I — I — I — well, I really won't eat my dinner.' Is there an allusion, in this other note, to the project that this irascible lover professed at one time of going into a monastery ? We know not. 'A plan,' writes Catherine, ' which had been formed four or five months ago, with which even N. B., the town and suburbs, were acquainted ; a plan for plunging a dagger into the breast of his friend, on the part of one who loves us the most, who has our happiness always at heart ; does such a plan do credit to the mind and heart of him who has conceived it and would put it into execution ? ' The favourite, as one may imagine, is him self not behindhand in tender flowers of speech. Only, and it is a curious trait of this astonishing PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 263 idyl, in all the abandonment of his amorous warmth, he never for a single instant forgets the distance between them. His turns of phrase, often more passionate and intense, always preserve a certain solemnity, never follow those of Catherine in their rather trivial freedom. ' If my prayer is heard, God will prolong your days to the utmost limit, O thou merciful mother ! ' That is his most customary style. He never, as a rule, uses the tutoiement except in this form of invocation, in which he seems to address her, the work of whose hands he feels himself to be, as he would address God. We have other fragments of love-letters of Patiomkine, not addressed to Catherine, in which he reveals himself as an accomplished virtuoso, mingling Oriental fantasy with the reverie of the North, and the delicacy of the most exquisite models that the West has furnished. ' O my life, O sister soul of mine, how can words tell thee of all my love ? Come, O my mistress (soudarka maid), hearken, O my friend, my joy, my treasure without price, gift un paralleled that God has given me ! . . . Darling (matouchka goloubouchka), give me the joy of seeing thee, the delight of rejoicing in thy heart. ... I kiss with all my love thy pretty little hands and thy pretty little feet.' 264 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA It is not to Catherine that Patiomkine writes that. Matouchka she is, indeed, but at the same time, and always, gossoudarinia (sovereign), before whom one bows with his forehead in the dust, even when speaking of love ; never goloubouchka (darling) nor soudarka (mistress). Called to the post of favourite in 1774, Patiomkine makes way, two years later, for Zavadofski. The lover gives place, but the friend remains ; and the engagement entered into at the beginning is not broken as yet. It will scarcely be so, even when, just before the death of the Prince of Taurida, Zoubof, installing himself as master in the palace as well as the heart of the sovereign, leaves no room for one who had formerly ruled alone. Till that time there is scarcely a difference to be traced in Catherine's manner towards the brilliant adventurer, whom she allows to rule over her court, command her armies, govern her empire, though she has already broken off her more tender relations with him ; and she accepts from him new lovers, while showering upon him not only riches and honours, but the most unmistakable signs of an unbroken affection. ' Good-bye, my friend ; take care of yourself ; PRI VA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 265 I embrace you with all my heart. Sacha sends greetings.' This is dated June 29, 1789, and Sacha is ¦Mamonof, the reigning favourite, and the creature of Patiomkine. ' Sachenka greets you and loves you as his own soul,' we read in another letter, dated May 5, 1784 ; ' he often speaks of you.' In September 1777, Patiomkine receives from the sovereign a present of 150,000 roubles. In 1779 he receives an advance of 750,000 roubles as his annual pension of 75,000. In 1783 Catherine pays to his account 100,000 roubles to hasten on the erection of a palace that he is building, which she will buy from him for several millions, and of which she will make him a present immediately after. He is Field-Marshal, he is Prime Minister, he is Prince, he has all the distinctions, all the posts, all the honours, all the powers, that there are to be bestowed. At the time of the annexa tion of the Crimea, during the second Turkish war, he acts as master, without guidance and without control. He does as he pleases, follows his own devices, and Catherine is like a little girl who bows before the decree of a superior genius. He leaves her without news for months to gether; he does not even trouble to reply to 266 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA her letters. Then she complains, but timidly, almost humbly : — ' I have been between life and death all the time that I have had no news of you. . . . For God's sake and for mine, take more care of yourself than you have done in the past. I am afraid of nothing, except that you may be ill. ... At this moment, my dear friend, you are no longer a private person who lives as he likes and does as he pleases : you belong to the state, to me.' Tender appellations, that of ' papa ' among others, find their place once more in the former lover's letters. The Empress is herself again in the frequent moments of discouragement into which the conqueror of the Crimea is always thrown by a momentary reverse. In 1787 an attack of the Turks on Kinburn makes him think of resigning his command. Catherine will not hear of it. ' Strengthen your mind and soul against all that may befall, and be assured that you will overcome everything with a little patience, but it is a weakness indeed to wish to quit your post and hide yourself away.' A few weeks later a storm destroyed part of the fleet brought together by Patiomkine at PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 267 Sebastopol. This time he would not only abandon the army, but evacuate the Crimea. 'What is it you say? 'writes Catherine. 'No doubt you thought so at the first moment, fancy ing that all the fleet had perished, but what would become of the rest of this fleet after the evacuation ? And how can you begin a campaign by the evacuation of a province which is not even threatened? It would be better to attack Otcha- kof or Bender, thus substituting the offensive for the defensive attitude, which you yourself say is less politic. Besides, it is not only against us that the wind has blown, I imagine ! Courage ! courage ! I write all this to you as to my best friend, my pupil and scholar, who at times shows more resolution than I, but at this moment I have more courage than you, because you are ill and I am well. ... I think you are as impatient as a child of five, whilst the affairs under your charge at this moment demand an imperturbable patience.' She adds that he may return for a time to St. Petersburg. Is he afraid that some one will play him an ill turn during his absence ? ' Neither time, nor distance, nor any one in the world will ever change my way of thinking in regard to you, nor the feelings I have for you.' 268 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA This freedom of action that Catherine allows to the man in whom she has placed her confi dence, this way of closing her eyes on his pro ceedings, in order to pay him the greater com pliment, is only the application of a system that we know already. Occasions are not wanting, however, on which the will of the Empress and her personal intervention are exercised in a direct and effectual manner. There are then frequent disagreements between the two, and neither friendship nor love hinder Catherine from insist ing on her authority being obeyed. The ill- temper of the favourite comes out plainly enough : he is now sharp, now sulky : ' I tell you,' he writes, ' what is for your interest ; after that, do as you please.' ' You may get angry if you like,' replies Catherine, ' but you must admit that I am right' The causes of disagreement are some times of a rather delicate nature. An inspector of the troops has been nominated by Patiom kine. Catherine opposes the choice, which she conceives to have been made for a parti cular reason. This is how she reasons the matter out : — ' Allow me to tell you that the miserable face of his wife is not worth the trouble you will have with such a man. Nor have you any chance PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 269 there, for madame is charming, but there is nothing to be gained by paying court to her. That is a well-known fact, and an immense family watches over her reputation. My friend, I am accustomed to tell you the truth. You do the same with me when there is occasion for it. Oblige me in this instance by choosing some one more suitable for the post, one who knows the work, so that the approval of the public and of the army may crown your choice and my nomina tion. I like to give you pleasure, and I do not like to refuse you anything, but I should like that in a post of that sort, every one might say, what a good choice, and not, what a wretched choice, of a man who does not know what he has to do. Make peace, after which you can come here and amuse yourself as much as you like.' Catherine forgot to add that meanwhile she was amusing herself on her side, and that this time she had not consulted her ' friend ' on the nature of the new amusement that she had found for herself. Zoubof appeared on the horizon and proclaimed himself a formidable rival in the conquest of the imperial favour, and even of the part that friendship had left to his pre decessor. Tied to the other extremity of the empire, Patiomkine bounded with rage ; he de- 270 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA clared that he would soon return to St. Peters burg, ' to have a tooth taken out ' (zoub means tooth in Russian) which troubled him. He did not succeed in his attempt. He came back only to witness the definite triumph of the enemy. He returned to the South, chafing at his fate ; he was struck to the heart, and soon death came to spare him the last humiliations of disgrace. Catherine, nevertheless, had taken all the trouble in the world to make him look favourably upon her new choice, and the letters in which she gives voice to this anxiety are not the least curious of the collection from which we have already made many extracts. Compliments, kind attentions, delicate flatteries, even unexpected outbursts of tenderness, follow one another, coming to the friend already sacrificed, on the part of the victorious lover, of ' the child,' the ' little blacky,' as she delights in calling the new favourite, with the caressing ways that age has not taken from her. ' The child,' she writes, ' thinks you are cleverer and more amusing and more amiable than all those about you ; but keep this quiet, for he does not know that I know that.' But Patiomkine is not to be wheedled. He sees his prestige escaping him, he feels that PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 27 1 this time the place is taken altogether, and not only the corner of the imperial palace, near her Majesty's private rooms, which he had let go so lightly, but that other sanctuary as well, which the vows of bygone days had led him to hope would retain a place for him for ever. That too he was going to lose ! Once already he had had a serious cause for anxiety. Among his rivals there had been one, before Zoubof, whom Catherine seemed to have loved as she never loved before or after. It seems to have been the fate of this extraordinary woman to exhaust, in all their diversity, the whole range of sentiments and sensations, and the entire order of the phenomena of passion. The love that she experienced for Lanskoi was utterly different from that which she had for Patiomkine, or for any of those who filled her life, so rich in varied impressions. But Lanskoi was not ambitious, and it was not given to Cathe rine to keep him long. On June 19, 1784, the young man who for the last four years had made the joy of her existence, in whom all her thoughts, all her affections, and all her desires were con centrated, the most petted, the most caressed, the most feted of favourites, was attacked by a mysterious disease. The German physician 272 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA Weikard was hastily summoned from St. Peters burg to Tzarskoie-Sielo. He was a savant of the pure Teutonic breed, little used to delicate discretion in his dealings. Sitting on the patient's bed, Catherine anxiously questioned him. ' What is it ? ' she asked. 'A bad fever, Madame, and he will die of it.' He insisted that the Empress should leave the patient, judging the malady to be contagious. So far as we can conjecture, it was a quinsy. Catherine never hesitated an instant between the counsels of prudence and those more imperious ones of her heart. She was soon taken with a troublesome uneasiness of the throat. She braved it all. Ten days later Lanskoi expired in her arms. He was only twenty-six. Hear the lament of the lover from whom the loved one has been taken by death : — ' When I began this letter, I was in hope and joy, and my thoughts came so swiftly that I knew not what became of them. It is so no more : I am plunged into the depths of sorrow, and my happiness has fled : I thought I should have died of the irreparable loss that I have just had, a week ago, of my best friend. I had hoped that he would be the support of my old age : he was attentive, he learnt much, he had acquired all my PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 273 tastes. He was a young man whom I was bringing up, who was grateful, kind, and good, who shared my sorrows when I had them, and rejoiced in my joys. In a word, I have the mis fortune to have to tell you, with tears, that General Lanskoi is no more, . . . and my room, so pleasant before, has become an empty den, in which I can just drag myself about like a shadow. Something went wrong with my throat the day before his death, and I have a raging fever ; nevertheless, since yesterday, I have got up from bed, but so feeble and sorrowful that at the present hour I cannot look on a human face without my voice being choked with tears. I cannot sleep or eat ; reading wearies me, and writing is too much for me. I know not what will become of me ; but I know that never in my life have I been so unhappy as since my kind, my best friend has quitted me. I have opened my drawer, I have found this sheet that I have begun, I have written these lines, but I can no more.' This is on July 2, 1784. Only after two months does Catherine resume her correspond ence with Grimm. ' I confess to you that all that time I was incapable of writing to you, because I knew that vol. 11. s 274 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA it would make us both suffer. A week after I had written to you my letter of July, Count Fedor Orlof and Prince Potemkin came to me. Up to then I could not endure to see any one ; these took me just in the right way : they began to howl with me, and then I felt at my ease with them ; but it took a long time to come to it, and thanks to my sensibility, I had become insensible to everything but this one sorrow ; and this seemed to increase and take fresh hold at every step, at every word. Do not think, however, that despite the horror of the situation, I neglected the least thing which required my attention. In the most awful moments I was called upon to give orders, and I gave them, in an orderly and sane manner : which particularly struck General Saltykof. More than two months passed without any respite ; at last some calmer hours have come, and now calmer days. The weather having become wet, the rooms at Tsarsko-Selo have had to be heated. Mine have been heated with such violence that on the evening of the 5 th September, not knowing where to go, I called out my coach, and came straight here without any one's knowing it; I have put up at the Her mitage, and yesterday, for the first time, I went to mass, and consequently, for the first time also, PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 275 I saw everybody and. was seen by everybody ; but, in truth, it was such an effort that on getting back to my room I was so overcome that any one but I would have fainted. ... I ought to re-read your three last letters, but I really cannot. ... I have become a most sad creature, and speak only in monosyllables. . . . Everything distresses me . . . and I never liked to be an object of pity.' An English orator, Lord Camelford, has said that Catherine honoured the throne by her vices, while the King of England (George III.) dis honoured it by his virtues. The expression is somewhat strong ; but it may be admitted that vices capable of manifesting themselves in so touching a form deserve something other than absolute condemnation. IV Favouritism, as practised by Catherine, was not without its serious inconveniences. On December 1, 1772, the French minister at St. Petersburg, Durand, writes to the Due d'AiguiUon that, according to reports coming from the palace, ' the Empress is so singularly occupied with the affair of M. Orlof, that for nearly two months she 276 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA has attended to nothing else, she reads nothing, and scarcely ever goes out.' Two months after, the crisis is not yet over. ' This woman does nothing,' says one of the courtiers to Durand ; ' so long as the Orlof faction is in power, there is nothing to be done.' Now these crises are frequent. In February 1780 the English am bassador Harris, coming to Prince Patiomkine to question him in reference to an important memorandum which has been in the Empress's hands for some time, is told that he has come at a wrong time : Lanskoi is ill, and the dread of his death so paralyses the Empress that she is unable to fix her attention on anything. All her thoughts of ambition and of glory are forgotten ; all care for her own interest or her own dignity leaves her; she is completely absorbed in this one anxiety. And Prince Patiomkine expresses his fear lest Count Panine should profit by the occasion to bring his ideas into play, and give a new direction to the foreign policy. Three years later, it is an illness of the Prince himself that throws the Sovereign into a state of such dis tress, that the Marquis de Verac, on the point of leaving St. Petersburg, cannot obtain his fare well audience. Those about the Empress, seeing her eyes red with the tears that she cannot PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 277 restrain, beg her not to appear in public. The audience is put off. When favouritism does not bring affairs to a standstill, it sometimes puts their guidance into hands as little suitable as possible to manage the helm, those of Mamonof or Zoubof, for example. And it is not merely the hasty advance ment of the favourites themselves, becoming generals, marshals, ministers, from one day to another : the high personages thus created with a wave of the wand have in turn their dependants. They have also their enemies whom they seek to put in the background — as Patiomkine did with the illustrious Roumiantsof, thus depriving the empire of its finest soldier. Sometimes they push forward an ambitious man in order to get rid of a rival. In 1787 Mamonof is alarmed by the appearance at court of a young Prince Kotchou- bey : he arranges to have him sent as ambassador to Constantinople! The favourite gone, the consequences of his elevation still last. After the death of Patiomkine, his secretary, Popof, replaces him as head of the government of Iekatierinoslaf. He settles everything off-hand by the magic formula : ' Such was the will of the late Prince.' He inherits the secret of this will, and remains the instrument of his ' maker,' as he 278 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA calls the deceased. Now, Count Rastoptchine, a good judge, declares that this man, though, during the lifetime of Patiomkine, he had governed the whole empire in his name for ten years, had no aptitude for affairs. Besides, he had other engagements. Rastoptchine never noticed in him more than one quality : the strength of his physical constitution, which enabled him regularly to pass his days and nights in gambling. Meanwhile, he is appointed general, chevalier of three orders, and incumbent of posts which bring him in 50,000 roubles a year. In February 1796 Rastoptchine writes : ' Never were crimes so frequent as they are now. Impunity and audacity are pushed to their utmost. Three days ago, a certain Kovalinski, who had been secretary of the War Commission, and had been dismissed by the Empress for pillage and cor ruption, was appointed governor at Riazan, because he has a brother blackguard like himself who is in favour with Gribolski, Plato Zoubofs chancellor. Ribas alone steals 500,000 roubles a year.' Favouritism is expensive. Castera has made out a formidable sum-total on account of ten principal heads of affairs, adding a doubtful supernumerary, Vysotski. I PRIVATE LIFE— FAVOURITISM 279 Amounts received — Roubles. The five Orlofs, . 17,000,000 Vysotski, . 300,000 Vassiltchikof, 1,110,000 Patiomkine, 50,000,000 Zavadofski, 1,380,000 Zovitch, 1,420,000 Korssakof, 920,000 Lanskoi', 7,260,000 Iermolof, . 550,000 Mamonof, . 88o,000 The brothers Zoubof, 3,500,000 Expenses of the favourites, Total 8,500,000 92,820,000 This comes, at the then rate of exchange, to more than 400 millions of francs. This is much the same as the calculation of the English am bassador Harris. From 1762 to 1783 the Orlof family received, according to him, 40,000 to 50,000 peasants and 17 million roubles in money, houses, plate, and jewels. Vassiltchikof, in twenty-two months, received 100,000 roubles in cash, 50,000 in jewels, a fur nished palace with 100,000 roubles, plate worth 30,000, a pension of 20,000, and 7000 peasants ; Patiomkine, in two years, 37,000 peasants, and about 9,000,000 roubles in jewels, palaces, pen sion, and plate ; Zavadofski, in eighteen months, 6000 peasants in Ukraine, 2000 in Poland, 280 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA 1800 in Russia, 80,000 roubles'-worth of jewels, 150,000 roubles in cash, plate worth 30,000, and a pension of 10,000; Zovitch, in a year, an. estate worth 500,000 roubles in Poland, another worth 100,000 in Livonia, 500,000 roubles in cash, 200,000 in jewels, and a commandership in Poland, with an income of 12,000 roubles; Kors sakof, in sixteen months, 150,000 roubles, and, on his leaving, 4000 peasants in Poland, 100,000 roubles to pay his debt, 100,000 for his equip ment, 20,000 roubles a month to travel abroad. These figures need no comment. In July 1778 the Chevalier de Corberon wrote from St. Peters burg to the Comte de Vergennes — ' The new favourite Corsak ' (such appears to have been the individual's original name) 'has just been made chamberlain. He has received 150,000 roubles, and his fortune, which will not last, will be at least brilliant for him and burden some for the state, which has to suffer for it. This nuisance, so often repeated, spreads dissatis faction and discontent in the public mind, and the result might be dangerous if Catherine II. were not more powerful and more farseeing than those about her. There are murmurs, but she rules through all, and the ascendency of her mind is her salvation, . . . Lately, in a Russian house, PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 281 some one calculated how much had been spent on favouritism during the present reign : the total came to 48 million roubles.' But it was not merely a question of money. Prince Chtcherbatof has excellently characterised the demoralising influence of an institution which brought into prominence excesses of this kind at the highest point of society. The favourites of Catherine might well, from the absolute point of view, seem only the equivalent of the mistresses of Louis XV., but the absolute is out of place both in morals and in politics, the difference of the sexes will probably always make, in this con nection, an enormous difference in the relative bearing of the same facts, and if Marie- Antoinette found painful surprises awaiting her at the court of her father-in-law, these were probably nothing to the impression made on the second wife of Paul, Maria Fedorovna, when her residence at St. Petersburg had brought her in contact with the official scandal of the imperial palace. Be sides, the mistresses of Louis XV. were not sup posed, in France, to transact the business of royalty. One of Kosciuszko's campanions in arms, Niemcewicz, speaks in his memoirs of having visited in 1794 the houses constructed for the 282 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA passage of the Empress on her tour in the Crimea, in 1787. The Empress's bedroom was everywhere made after a uniform plan. Beside the bed was a square of glass ; on touching a spring it moved, and another bed, that of Mamonof, appeared. Catherine was then fifty- nine ! Shamelessness carried to this height was surely a school of vice. There was certainly, in this strange woman, a colossal disregard of her situation in regard to the eternal laws of womanhood. For it must be observed that there was in her in no sense an affectation of cynicism, nor even an obliteration of the moral sense, nor even deprava tion of mind. Favouritism with all its conse quences once excepted, Catherine is severe in regard to moral questions, and very susceptible in regard to outward decency. She values chastity, and at times is even prudish. One day, on the way to Kief, she requests the Comte de Segur, who is in her carriage, to repeat some verses. He recites a piece, ' a little free and gay,' he tells us, 'but nevertheless decent enough to have been well received at Paris by the Due de Nivernais, the Prince de Beauveau, and ladies as virtuous as they are amiable.' Catherine at once frowns, stops him midway by a question PRIVATE LIFE— FAVOURITISM on quite another subject, and turns off the conver sation. In 1788, the Admiral Paul Jones, whom she has summoned to her service from England, is accused of having taken liberties with a girl belonging to the court. He is immediately dismissed, notwithstanding the dearth of men capable of taking the command. For a similar reason the English ambassador Macartney is obliged to leave his post. In 1790, chatting with her secretary over the events that have been taking place in France, Catherine inveighs against the actresses, whom she accuses of having depraved the morals of the nation. ' What has ruined the country,' she declares, ' is that the people fall into vice and drunkenness. The comic opera has corrupted the whole nation.' She is conscious of not having taken to drink herself, and of having done nothing to corrupt the morals of her_ country// »• But she thinks it quite natural to write to Patiomkine that his successor Mamonof — Sachenka, as she calls him — 'loves him, and looks upon him as a father.' And she is in nowise embarrassed in asking her son and daughter-in-law for news of the King Poniatowski, whom they have seen in passing through Warsaw. 'I think,' she writes, 'that his Polish Majesty would have some difficulty 284 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA in remembering my face as it was twenty-five years ago by the portraits you showed him.' 'One could never venture,' writes the Prince de Ligne in his portrait of the sovereign, 'to speak ill of Peter I. nor of Louis XVI. before the Empress, nor the least thing in regard to religion or morals. Scarcely could one venture on anything in the least risky, however glossed over ; at which, however, she would laugh quietly. She never permitted trifling, either of this kind or in reference to any one.' A ukase instructing keepers of public baths to have separate compartments for the two sexes, and not to allow any men in the women's quarter, except those required for attendance, and doctors, bears the signature of Catherine. An odd ex ception is made in favour of painters, who would study their art in the feminine compartments. Certain accusations have nevertheless been brought forward, associating the last years in particular of the Empress with infamous tastes and habits. Besides the 'set' admitted to the private receptions at the Hermitage, another more limited ' set ' had been formed, comprising, in addition to the two brothers Zoubof and Peter Saltykof, some women whose names we prefer to omit. The name of Lesbos has been uttered PRIVA TE LIFE— FA VO URITISM 285 in regard to these gatherings, and the name of the Cybele of the North affixed to the other glorious titles of Catherine the Great. We are averse to discuss such imputations. We cannot believe that Catherine has ever justified them, though we dare not say that she has not, in a sense, deserved them. Is not this outrage to her memory a just expiation ? Maria Theresa was not a woman to give credence to calumnies without proper examination. She could also be indulgent, needing no indulgence on her own account. Nevertheless she wrote in 1778 — 'The Grand Duke, it is well known, like his supposed father and the Empress, is utterly debauched.' From the sovereign and mother, by way of the lover, the scandal thus attained the son also. The sudden death of Catherine, coming as it did, was perhaps another expiation. For a long time past her excesses had been thought to be telling on her robust health. In a despatch of May 1774, Durand, the French charge- d' affaires, speaking of the anxiety of the favourite on account of the Empress's health, wrote — ' He is well aware of what few people know, that the Empress had a fainting-fit a day or two ago, lasting more than half an hour, just as she 286 CATHERINE II. OF RUSSIA was about to take a cold bath; that her most trusty servants have noticed curious twitches and movements that she has been subject to for some time ; that by the use of cold baths and of tobacco she has moments of absence of mind and ideas quite opposed to her natural ones. All that I infer at present from these symptoms is that she is affected with hysteria.' In 1774 these conjectures were premature. Twenty years later Catherine justified them. We ask the pardon of our readers for having raised the veil cast by time and oblivion over these details. For all we have done we have had but one reason, and we desire but one excuse — the sincerity that, in default of other merit, we have brought to our task, a task whose difficulties and dangers we have by no means ignored, but one which has appealed to us in spite of all, as it has interested, we hope, others as well, by reason of the variety, the complexity, and the originality, perhaps unique, of facts which are purely a matter of history, and which yet might challenge the best attempts of the most fertile imagination. FINIS. Printed by T. and A. Constable, Printers to Her Majesty, at the Edinburgh University Press. TTeleovapbic Kfcbrees : SunlocJes, .'London, si Bedford street, w.c September i S<)3 A LIST OF Mr. WILLIAM HEINEMANN'S Publications AND Forthcoming Works The Books wentwned in this List can be obtained to order by any Book seller if not tn stock, or ivill be sent by the Publisher post free on receipt of the published price. jnaej of autbors. PAGE TAGE Alexander 13 Knight - - 4 Anstey 8 Kraszewski 12 Arbuthnot 9 14 Atherton 14 Le Caron . 7 Baddeley 7, 16 Lee ... 11 Balestier 10, 14 Leighton . 10 Barrett 14 Leland 4 Behrs . 7 Lie . 7,J8 Bendall 16 Lowe ... Bjornson * A> I2 Lowry ij Bowen 5 Lynch . 13 Briscoe 14 Maartens 11 Brown TO Macnab 11 Brown and 3ii:Tulis . . 16 Maeterlinck IS 8 8 Buchanan . 9, n, 14 Mantegazza Butler 5 Maude Caine . 9, *3 Maupassant 12 88 Caine . 16 Maurice Cambridge T3 njerriman . Chester 8 Michel .... 3 Clarke 11 Mitford .... 13 Colomb 8 10 Compayre- 5 Murray 8 Coppee 14 Norris 10 Couperus 12 11 Cowen 11 Palacio-Vakk's 12 Crackantho pe . . 14 Pearce 11 Davidson 5 Pennell 8 Dawson 16 Philips 14 De Quincey 7 Phelps 14 Dow.-, on 10 Pinero 15 Eeden 4 Rawnstey , 9 Ellwanger 8 Kenan 9 Ely . 9 Richter 9 Farrar . 9 Riddell 14 Fitch . 5 Rives .... 14 Forbes 8 Roberts (C.G.TJ.)' . 10 Fothergill 14 Roberts (A vim) 12 Franzos 12 Salaman (M. C.J 8 Frederic . 8, 13 Salaman (J. S.) 9 Garner 9 Sarcey 7 Garnett 4 Scidmore . 10 Gaulot 4 Scudamore . S Gilchrist 11 Serao 12 Gore . 16 Sergeant , 13 Gosse . . • t,n, 15 Steel . 11 Grand . 10, 1 • Tallentyre 8 Gray . 8 Tasma 11, 13 Gray (Max veil) 10 Terry . . . 4 Griffiths 16 Thurston . 16 Hall . 16 Tolstoy T2, 15 Hanus > ¦ 5 Tree . 15 Harland 14 Valera .... 12 Hardy 13 Vazoff 12 Heine . • • • 6, 7 Waliszewski 4 Henderson 14 ^ Ward . ... T4 Howard 11 Warden .... IJ Hughes . 5 Waugh 7 Hungerford . ii, 13 Weitemeyer 9 Ibsen . 15 West . 5 Irving . 15 Whistler . 4, a Ingersoll 10 White 11 Jarger . 7 Whitman .... 9 Jeaffreson 7 Williams .... 9 Keeling • . 1 c Wood .... 11 Kennedy . . IX Zangwill .... 8, 11 Kimball . _ . . . 16 Zola . . 14 Kipling ani-* Balestier . . . n MR. WILLIAM HEINEMANN'S LIST. In preparation. REMBRANDT: HIS LIFE, HIS WORK, AND HIS TIME. BY EMILE MICHEL, MEMBER OF THE INSTITUTE OF FKA.VCE. (Authorised EngUsh Edition.) EDITED AND PREFACED EY FREDERICK • WEDMORE. Nothing need be said in justification of a comprehensive book upon the life and work of Rembrandt. A classic among classics, he is also a modern of moderns. His works are to-day more sought after and better paid for than ever before ; he is now at the zenith of a fame which can hardly decline. The author of this work is perhaps, of all living authorities on Rembrandt, the one who has had the largest experience, the best opportunity of knowing all that can be known of the master. The latest inventions in photogravure and process-engraving have enabled the publisher to reproduce almost everything that is accessible in the public galleries of Europe, as well as most of the numerous private collections containing specimens of Rembrandt's work in England and on the Continent. This work will be published in two volumes 4to, each containing over 300 pages. There will be over 30 photogravures, about 40 coloured reproductions of paintings and chalk drawings, and 250 illustrations in the text. Two Editions will be printed — one on Japanese vellum, limited to 200 numbered copies (for England and America), with duplicates of the plates on India paper, price £\o icr. net. The ordinary edition will be published at £2 2s. net. An illustrated prospectus is now ready and may be had on applica tion. Orders will be received by all booksellers, in town and country MR. WILLIAM HEINEMANN'S LIST. forthcoming Works. MEMOIRS. By Charles Godfrey Leland (Hans Breitmann) In Two Volumes, 8vo. With a Portrait. THE ROMANCE OF AN EMPRESS. Catharine II. of Russia. By R. Waliszewski. In Two Volumes, 8vo. With a Portrait. A FRIEND OF THE QUEEN. Being Correspondence between Marie Antoinette and Monsieur de Fersen. By Paul Gaulot. In One Volume, 8vo. With Portraits. LIFE OF HEINRICH HEINE. By Richard Garnett, LL.D. With Portrait. Crown 8vo (uniform with the translation of Heine's Works). GOLF STORIES. By Professor Knight of St. Andrews University. Crown 8vo. LITTLE JOHANNES. By Frederick van Eeden. Translated from the Dutch by Clara Bell. With an Introduction by Andrew Lang. Illustrated. *,* Also a Large Paper Edition. STRAY MEMORIES. By Ellen Terry. In One Volume. 410. Illustrated. A NEW PLAY. By BjiiRNSTjERNE Ejornson. Translated from the Norwegian. SONGS ON STONE. By J. McNeill Whistler. A Series of lithographic drawings in colour by Mr. Whistler, will appear from time to time in parts, under the ab.jve title. Each containing four plates. The first issue of 200 copies will be sold at Two Guineas net per part, by Subscription for the Series only. The*e will also be issued 50 copies on J 'apanese paper, signed by the artist, each Five Guineas net. MR. WILLIAM HEINEMANN'S LIST. £be (Sreat Eoucatore. A Series of Volumes by Eminent Writers^ presenting in their entirety "A Biographical History of Education?* The Times.—" A Series of Monographs on ' The Great Educators ' should prove of service to all who concern themselves with the history, theory, and practice of education." The Speaker. — ** There is a promising sound about the title of Mr. Heine- mann's new series, ' The Great Educators.' It should help to allay the hunger and thirst for knowledge and culture of the vast multitude of young men and maidens which our educational system turns out yearly, provided at least with an appetite for instruction." Each subject will form a complete volume, crown 8vo, $s. Nozu ready. ARISTOTLE, and the Ancient Educational Ideals. Thomas Davidson, M.A., LL.D. The Times. — " A very readable sketch of a very interesting subject." LOYOLA, and the Educational System of the Jesuits. By Rev. Thomas Hughes, S.J. Saturday Review. — " Full of valuable information. . . . If a school master would learn how the education of the young can be carried on so as to confer real dignity on those engaged in it, we recommend him to read Mr, Hughes' book." ALCUIN, and the Rise of the Christian Schools. By Professor Andrew F. West, Ph.D. FROEBEL, and Education by Self-Activity. By H. Cour- THOPE BOWEN, M.A. ABELARD, and the Origin and Early History of Uni versities. By Jules Gabriel Compayre, Piofessor in the Faculty of Toulouse. In preparation. ROUSSEAU; and, Education according to Nature. By Paul H. Han us. HORACE MANN, and Public Education in the United States. By Nicholas Murray Butler, Ph.D. BELL and LANCASTER, and Public Elementary Edu cation in England. By J. G. Fitch, LL.D., Her Majesty's Inspector of Schools. Volumes on Herbart, and Modern German Education ; and Pestalozzi : or, the Friend and Student of Children, to fallow. 6 MR. WILLIAM HEINEMANN'S LIST. THE WORKS OF HEINRICH HEINE. TRANSLATED BY CHARLES GODFREY LELAND, M.A., F.R.L.S. (HANS BEEITMANN.) Issued in Two Editions : — The Library Edition, in crown Svo, cloth, at $s. per volume. Each volume of this edition is sold separately. The Large Paper Edition, limited to 100 Numbered Copies, price 15.V. per volume net, will only be supplied to subscribers for the Complete Work, The following Volumes, forming HEINE'S PROSE WORKS, Are now ready, and may be had in a handsome box, in special binding, gilt top, price 1.1 iqs. I. FLORENTINE NIGHTS, SCHNABELEWOPSKI, THE RABBI OF BACHARACH, and SHAKE SPEARE'S MAIDENS AND WOMEN. II., III. PICTURES OF TRAVEL. 1823-1828. In Two Volumes. IV. THE SALON. Letters on Art, Music, Popular Life, and Politics. V., VI. GERMANY. In Two Volumes. VII., VIII. FRENCH AFFAIRS. Letters from Paris 1832 and Lutetia. In Two Vols. Times. — "We can recommend no better medium for making; acquaintance at. first hand with 'the German Aristophanes' than the works of Heinrich Heine, translated by Charles Godfrey Leland. Mr. Leland manages pretty successfully to preserve the easy grace of the original." Saturday Review.— ¦" Veriiy Heinrich Heine and not Jean Paul is der Einzige among Germans: and great is the venture of translating him which Mr. Leland has so boldly undertaken, and in which he has for the most part quitted himself so well." Pall Mall Gazette. ~u It is a brilliant performance, both for the quality of the translation of each page and the sustained effort of rendering so many of them. ( There is really hardly any need to learn German now to appreciate Heine s prose. English literature of this country does not contain much prose more striking, more entertaining, and more thought provoking than these now placed before English readers." Daily Telegraph.— -"Mr. Leland has done his translation in able and scho larly fashion.' In preparation, THE POETIC WORKS OF HEINRICH HEINE. The first of which, forming Vol. IX. of the Works, will be THE BOOK OF SONGS. Followed by NEW POEMS. ATTA TROLL, GERMANY and ROMANCERO LAST POEMS. %* Large Paper Edition, limited to loo Numbered Copies, 15s. each, net. Prospectus on application. MR. WILLIAM HEINEMANN'S LIST. 7 VICTORIA : Queen and Empress. By John Cordy Jeaffreson-, Author o "The Real Lord Byron," &c. In Two Volumes Svo. With Portraits. £1 ios. ALFRED, LORD TENNYSON: a Study of his Life and Work. By Arthur Waugh, B.A. Oxon. With Twenty Illustrations from Photographs Specially Taken for this Work, and Five Portraits. Third Edition, Revised. Crown 8vo, 6s. TWENTY-FIVE YEARS IN THE SECRET SERVICE. The Recollections of a Spy. By Major Le Caron. Ninth Edition. In One Volume, 8vo. With Portraits and Facsimiles. Price 14J. ALSO A POPULAR EDITION, without portraits, 8vo, boards, 2s. 6d. DE QUINCEY MEMORIALS. Being Letters and other Records here first Published, with Communications from Coleridge, The Wordsworths, Hannah More, Professor Wilson and others. Edited, with Introduction, Notes, and Narrative, by Alexander H. Japp, LL.D., F.R.S.E. In two volumes, demy 8vo, cloth, with portraits, 30s. net. RECOLLECTIONS OF MIDDLE LIFE. By Francisque Sarcey. Translated by E. L. Carey. In One Volume, Svo. With Portrait, xos. 6d. PRINCE BISMARCK. An Historical Biography. By Charles Lowe, M.A. With Portraits. Crown 8vo, 6s. THE FAMILY LIFE OF HEINRICH HEINE. Illus trated by one hundred and twenty-two hitherto unpublished letters ad dressed by him to different members of his famihy. Edited by his nephew Baron Ludwig von Embden, and translated by Charles Godfrey Leland. In One Volume, 8vo, with 4 Portraits. 12s. 6d. RECOLLECTIONS OF COUNT LEO TOLSTOY. Together with a Letter to the Women of France on the " Kreutzer Sonata." By C. A. Behrs. Translated from the Russian by C E. Turner, English Lecturer in the University of St. Petersburg. In One Volume, 8vo. With Portrait. 105. 6d. THE LIFE OF HENRIK IBSEN. By Henrik J/eger. Translated by Clara Bell. With the Verse done into English from the Norwegian Original by Edmund GoSSE. Crown Svo, cloth, 6s. QUEEN JOANNA I. OF NAPLES, SICILY, AND JERUSALEM ; Countess of Provence Forcalquier, and Piedmont. An Essay on her Times. By St. Clair Baddeley. Imperial 8vo. With Numerous Illustrations. *6s. THE POSTHUMOUS WORKS OF THOMAS DE QUINCEY. Edited with Introduction and Notes from the Author's Original MSS., by Alexander H. Japp, LL.D, F.R.S.E., &c. Crown 8vo, cloth, 6s. each. I SUSPIRIA DE PROFUND1S. With other Essays. II. CONVERSATION AND COLERIDGE. With other Essays. 8 MR. WILLIAM HEINEMANN'S LIS7. MR. PUNCH'S POCKET IBSEN. A Collection of some of the Master's best known Dramas, condensed, revised, and slightly re arranged for the benefit of the Earnest Student. By F. Anstey Author of "Vice Versa," "Voces Populi," &c. With Illustrations, reproduced by permission, from. Punch, and a new Frontispiece, by Bernard Part-. ridge. i6mo, cloth, ^s. 6d. FROM WISDOM COURT. By Henry Seton Merriman and Stephen Graham Tallentvre. With 30 Illustrations by E. Courboin. Crown 8vo, cloth, 3$. 6d. THE OLD MAIDS' CLUB. By I. Zangwill, Author of " The Bachelors' Club." Illustrated by F. H. Townsend. Crown 8vo, cloth, 3J. 6d. WOMAN— THROUGH A MAN'S EYEGLASS. By Malcolm C. Salaman. With Illustrations by Dudley Hardy. Crown 8vo, cloth, 3J. 6d. THE ART OF TAKING A WIFE. By Professor Mante- gazza. Translated from the Italian. Crown 8vo, cloth. GIRLS AND WOMEN. By E. Chester. Pott 8vo, cloth, 2j. 6d. , or gilt extra, 3J. 6d. QUESTIONS AT ISSUE. Essays. By Edmund Gosse. Crown 8vo, buckram, gilt top, 7s. 6d. **** A Limited Edition on Large Paper, 25s. net. GOSSIP IN A LIBRARY. By Edmund Gosse, Author of " Northern Studies," &c. Third Edition. Crown 8vo, buckram, gilt top, js. 6d. *** A Limited Edition on Large Paper, 25$. net. THE ROSE : A Treatise on the Cultivation, History, Family Characteristics, &c, of the Various Groups of Roses. With Accurate Description of the Varieties now Generally Grown. By H. B. Ell- wanger With an Introduction by George H Ellwanger. i2mo cloth, 5s THE GARDEN'S STORY; or, Pleasures and Trials of an Amateur Gardener. By G. H. Ellwanger. With an Introduction by the Rev. C. Wolley Dod. i2mo, cloth, with Illustrations, ss. THE GENTLE ART OF MAKING ENEMIES. As pleasingly exemplified in many instances, wherein the serious ones of this earth, carefully exasperated, have been prettily spurred on to indiscretions and unseemliness, while overcome by an undue sense of right Bv J , M'Neill Whistler. A New Edition. Pott 4to, half-cloth, 10V. 6d. THE JEW AT HOME. Impressions of a Summer and Autumn Spent with Him in Austria and Russia. By Joseph Pennei i With Illustrations by the Author. 4to, cloth, ss. THE NEW EXODUS. A Study of Israel in Russia. By Harold Frederic. Demy 8vo, Illustrated. i6j. THE GREAT WAR IN 189 -. A Forecast. By Rear- Admiral Colomb, Col. Maurice, R.A., Captain Maude, Archibald Forbes Charles Lowe, D Christie Murray, and F. Scudamore. In One Volume, large 8vo. With numerous Illustrations, 121. 6d. IDLE MUSINGS: Essays in Social Mosaic. By E Conder Gray, Author of " Wise Words and Loving Deeds," &c. &c. Crown 8vo cloth, os. ' MR. WILLIAM HEINEMANN'S LIST. g STUDIES OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY. By Ernest Renan, late of the French Academy. In One Volume, 8vo, 7$. 6d. THE ARBITRATOR'S MANUAL. Under the London Chamber of Arbitration. Being a Practical Treatise on the Power and Duties of an Arbitrator, with the Rules and Procedure of the Court of Arbitration, and the Forms. By Joseph Seymour Salaman, Author of " Trade Marks," etc. Fcap. Svo. 3$. 6d. THE COMING TERROR. And other Essays and Letters. By Robert Buchanan. Second Edition. Demy 8vo, cloth, 12s. 6d. ARABIC AUTHORS: A Manual of Arabian History and Literature. By F. F. Arbuthnot, M.R.A.S., Author of " Early Ideas," "Persian Portraits," &c. 8vo, cloth, 5s. THE LABOUR MOVEMENT IN AMERICA. By Richard T. Ely, Ph.D., Associate in Political Economy, Johns Hopkins University. Crown 8vo, cloth, 5$. THE SPEECH OF MONKEYS. By Professor R. L. Garner. Crown 8vo, 7^. 6d. THE WORD OF THE LORD UPON THE WATERS. Sermons read by His Imperial Majesty the Emperor of Germany, while at Sea on his Voyages to the Land of the Midnight Sun. Composed by Dr. Richter, Army Chaplain, and Translated from the German by John R. McIlraith. 4to, cloth, ss. 6d. THE HOURS OF RAPHAEL, IN OUTLINE. Together with the Ceiling of the Hall where they were originally painted By Mary E. Williams. Folio, cloth, £2 2s. net. THE PASSION PLAY AT OBERAMMERGAU, 1890. By F. W. Farrar, D.D., F.R.S., Archdeacon and Canon of Westminster, &c &c. 4to, cloth, 2s. 6d. THE LITTLE MANX NATION. (Lectures delivered at the Royal Institution, 1891.) By Hall Caine, Author of "The Bond man," " The Scapegoat," &c. Crown 8vo, cloth, 3s. 6d.; paper, 2s. 6d. NOTES FOR THE NILE. Together with a Metrical Rendering of the Hymns of Ancient Egypt and of the Precepts of Ptah- hotep (the oldest book in the world). By Hardwicke D. Kawnsley, M.A. Imperial i6mo, cloth, 5s. DENMARK: lis History, Topography, Language, Literature, Fine Arts, Social Life, and Finance. Edited by H. Weitemeyer. Demy Svo, cloth, with Map, 12s. 6d. '"'> LOU. Fr..m the German of Baron Alexander von Roberts. DONA LUZ. From the Spanish of Juan Valera. THE J EW. From the Polish of Joseph Ignatius Kraszewski UNDJiR THE YOKE. From the Bulgarian of Ivan Vazoif! MR. WILLIAM HEINEMANN'S LIST. 13 popular 3s. 65. IRovels. CAPT'N DAVY'S HONEYMOON, The Blind Mother, and The Last Confession. By Hall Caine, Author of " The Bondman," " The Scapegoat," &c. Sixth Thousand. THE SCAPEGOAT. By Hall Caine, Author of "The Bondman," &c. Nineteenth Thousand. THE BONDMAN. A New Saga. By Hall Caine. Twenty-third Thousand. DESPERATE REMEDIES. By Thomas Hardy, Author of "Tess of the D'Urbervilles," &c. A LITTLE MINX. By Ada Cambridge, Author of "A Marked Man," &c. A MARKED MAN: Some Episodes in his Life. By Ada Cambridge, Author of "Two Years' Time," "A Mere Chance," &c. THE THREE MISS KINGS. By Ada Cambridge, Author of Chemical News.— "The man of culture who wishes for a general and accurate acquaintance with the physical properties of gases, will rind in Mr Kimball'! work just what he requires. * ¦"¦uilu'lu a HEAT AS A FORM OF ENERGY. By Professor R H Thurston, of Cornell University. Crown 8vo, cloth, Illustrated u ' Manchester Examiner.- Bears out the character of its predecessors for discoveries' "° statement and deduction under the light of the most recent LONDON : WILLIAM HEINEMANN, 21 BEDFORD STREET, W.C. 7833