MM wm. •Y^LE«¥Mfl¥EI&SIirY- DIVINITY SCHOOL TROWBRIDGE LIBRARY CHRISTIAN MYSTICISM BY W. H. DYSON "By love He may be gotten and holden, but by thought or understanding never." f —~.-*:js,~<- \ (YALE eiYIMITY SCHOOL | / LONDON JAMES CLARKE & CO., 13 & 14, FLEET STREET 1913 PREFACE The following Studies were written primarily for my own guidance, to give definiteness to thoughts suggested by a somewhat prolonged and extensive reading of the Mystics. I have also had in mind present-day questions of religious life and thought, and the influence of these has necessarily given colour to the consideration of the subject. Indeed, it is the intimate relation between Mysticism and the needs of our own time that has prompted the study. That for which the Mystics stand — intense personal religion — is, as I interpret the situation, the true solution of our problems. There is, of course, no attempt to treat exhaustively the questions raised, and I should not have ventured upon publication but for the encouragement of others, in whose judgment the book may prove useful to some of the increasing number of those whose interest in Mysticism is newly awakened but whose opportunities of personal study have been limited. The several chapters, while constituting separate studies, have a vital unity. Underlying all that I have written is the conviction that Religion, in its Christian form, is a Life-principle perfectly expressed in the two great Commandments of Love, and because essentially spiritual therefore mystical, in IV Preface the very- measure of its depth and sincerity. This conviction is the ground of the contention throughout that the Christian Mystics are not isolated instances of religious genius, removed from us by incom municable gifts and endowments, but are our " brethren in Christ," witnessing to us of " the Spirit of Christ which was in them," and calling us to share thexonfidence of their assurance, and to be partakers of the gladness of their joy. To those who with strenuous labour are seeking to build up the Kingdom of God ; to those who are weary and spent with ministering to the world's necessities ; to those in whom the River of Life is falling low, I offer this gathering of quiet hours. W. H. DYSON. Birkdale, southport, August 3, 1913. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAQE I. THE REVIVAL OF MYSTICISM ... 7 II. HAVE THE MYSTICS A MESSAGE FOR US ? 21 III. THE ABNORMAL IN MYSTICISM . . 33 IV. THE MYSTIC WAY 42 V. MYSTICAL THEOLOGY .... 54 VI. THE SEAT OF AUTHORITY ... 67 VII. MYSTICAL INTERPRETATION • • • 77 VIII. PRACTICAL MYSTICISM . . . . 90 IX. A TYPICAL MYSTIC . . . 102 X. SPIRITUAL RELIGION .... Il6 XI. THE MYSTIC LIFE 126 XII. QUAKERISM I42 XIII. THE HIDDEN LIFE OF THE SOUL . . 157 XIV. ASCETICISM I74 XV. THE INDWELLING SPIRIT . . . 189 STUDIES IN CHRISTIAN MYSTICISM CHAPTER I THE REVIVAL OF MYSTICISM The religious life of any period is conditioned, in outward expression, by the dominating spirit of the age. In an age characterised by great activity, when visible and tangible results are demanded, religion seeks expression in social service, and the Kingdom of Heaven is set forth pre-eminently as a Social Redemption. | Almost necessarily, the emphasis is laid upon the human side in the great work of righteousness. Duty, rather than faith, is the watchword. " To labour is to pray " is the controlling idea. The call to meditation, the exercises of secret devotion; the fellowship of social prayer, these are unresponded to, almost neglected. At such a time, when spiritual religion is, apparently at least, in abeyance, it is surely a vain hope to expect, or even to speak of, a revival of Mysticism. The very type of religion which that term suggests to many is deemed unpractical and sentimental, 7 Studies in Christian Mysticism or worse than that, Mysticism is thought of as but another name for mistiness and unreality. Even by thoughtful men religion is divided into different categories, Practical, Institutional, Mystical, as though each were in itself religion, adequate to the religious life of the special type of nature to which it appeals. I cannot accept this unnatural and impossible division. Vital religion is all of these, practical, institutional, mystical. It appeals to the fulness of human nature, and finds, or ought to find, its expression in all the activities of mind and of life. The revival of Mysticism is, in my judgment, the outstanding need at the present time, that is of Mysticism rightly interpreted, and expressed. Emphasis must be laid upon these very important qualifications. Mysticism, as it is found in Christian experience, has been and is much misunderstood, and, because misunderstood, neglected and even denounced. This conviction has grown upon me while engaged in a somewhat wide, and, I trust, sympathetic study of the subject generally, and of the writings of many of the greater Mystics, and it is with the hope of attracting others to enter upon the same study that I venture to give expression to these thoughts on Mysticism. Surprising as it may be, considering the prevailing spirit of the age, there are very marked signs of the 8 The Revival of Mysticism awakening of interest in this subject. If we may judge from the activity of the Press we cannot but conclude that many minds are now engaged in this study. The classics of the Mystics and selections from long-neglected mystical writings have recently been published. Even more notable is the increasing stream of new literature on the subject, critical and biographical. Indeed the publication, within a very short time, of several most scholarly and sympa thetic works on Mysticism is the principal feature of present-day religious thought. Three of these really great books I have found especially helpful and stimulating. The writer known in the literary world as " Evelyn Underhill," has laid all students under great obligation by her invaluable book, Mysticism, a Study in the Nature and Development of Man's Spiritual Consciousness. The writings of Dr. Rufus M. Jones are of supreme value, if for no other reason than this, that they present the subject from the sympathetic standpoint of a member of The Society of Friends. The introduction to his Studies in Mystical Religion impresses me as the best short exposition of Mysticism. To these two books must be added a third, Baron von Hiigel's The Mystical Element in Religion, in many respects a very trying book both in style and in arrangement, but discussing questions which are fundamental with great skill and profound scholarship. 9 Studies in Christian Mysticism Accepting as a fact the revived interest in and study of Mysticism we are led to ask what is behind this movement of thought, whence is its origin, and what is its significance for religion ? In the realm of Science new and marvellous discoveries have been made, discoveries which have gone far to revolutionise thought. The sense of the wonder and mystery of nature has again [ awakened. Fundamental ideas of a former genera- '. tion no longer satisfy. The secrets of nature are felt to be richer and more profound than reason can comprehend, secrets which seem to belong ultimately to the spiritual, rather than to the natural realm. In the " seventies " the material istic theory of the universe was dominant, a theory which found expression in the oft-quoted sentence of Tyndall's Belfast Address : " I discern in matter the potency and promise of all terrestrial life." How far the pendulum has swung may be judged from Sir William Crookes' Bristol Address, 1898, in which he said : "I should prefer to say that in life I see the promise and potency of all forms of matter." In Philosophy, Eucken stands for an essentially mystical basis of religion. In all his recent writings I he insists upon an independent " Spiritual Life " with which man is in fellowship, and through which alone he attains to the fulness of his own personality. 10 The Revival of Mysticism The oppressive weight of a materialistic philosophy has been removed. Complacent confidence in " progress " has received a shock. Two generations of universal education have not wrought righteous ness of life. Commercial prosperity has but forced the more upon us the grave problems of poverty. All is not well in the best of all possible worlds. The need, more or less openly confessed, is of a spiritual power, a moral, regenerating energy, " a power not ourselves making for righteousness." In Psychology the new experimental method of study has already enlarged and enriched our ideas of personality. The " Hidden Soul " is no longer a mere poetic fancy. We have been made to realise that mind, as it manifests itself in normal consciousness, is but a fragment of a larger self which lies behind. To this must be added the new doctrine, now generally received, that communi cation can take place between mind and mind, independently of the recognised channels of sense. Some of the results of " Psychical Research " are now included in the new Psychology, and the influence of both on the revival of the study of Mysticism is seen in the writings of William James, the greatest exponent of the new Psychology, and especially in his Gifford Lectures (1901-2), The Varieties of Religious Experience, which arrested very wide attention and quickened in many minds 11 Studies in Christian Mysticism a new interest in the reality and significance of mystical experience. It is, however, in religious thought itself that the movement towards Mysticism finds its direct and strongest impulse. German Mysticism was a re- ' action from the cold reasonings of Scholasticism, and the formalism of Ecclesiasticism. Quietism was a protest against the excessive externalism of the Roman Church. The Quakers stood for " the Inward Light " as opposed to the authority of Church and Creeds. In the history of religion progress has ever been by loss and recovery of balance, as a man walks. The condition of religion at the present time points unmistakably to some great change. This — it is often said — is an age of transition. The old order is gone, but the new is not yet visibly manifest. Fundamental issues are raised which cannot now be met by the appeal to authority. The principle of Evolution which now controls all our thinking ; the acceptance of the methods of literary and historical criticism and their unreserved use ; the repudiation of all dogmatic authority, and the confident claim to examine all that passes for truth by the powers of reason — these are some of the forces by which religious beliefs are now tested with a severity as great or greater than in any previous age. In some cases the result has been 12 The Revival of Mysticism disastrous. Old religious beliefs have been uprooted, and no new faiths have been implanted. In other cases the issue has been happier — the things that could be shaken have been removed, but the eternal realities have been revealed. But upon all thoughtful minds, and in the very measure of the sincerity of their convictions, the question is pressed : What is the true, firm basis of your religious life and faith ? It is just here that the new Psychology and the new Apologetics meet. Psychology insists that experience shall be accounted for, claims that experience is as real as any sensuous perception. So the religious life is cast in upon itself ; the t religious experience must be its own evidence. " Believe what thou findest written in the sanctuaries of man's soul." Yes, but what is written there, and how shall we discover and interpret the writing ? It is into the sanctuary of his own soul every man must enter, the thoughts of his own heart he must examine. But the task of self-knowledge is the hardest any man can set himself. " The calm of perfect knowledge, where spirit holds communion with itself, and is to itself transparent," is a fare grace, for which not only temperament, but also environment, is absolutely essential, and that temperament has to be cultivated, that environment created. Life, for the most part, 13 Studies in Christian Mysticism ' has to be lived at high pressure. Activity is the \ watchword of the hour. " The cares that occupy \ the passing day " are manifold and imperative. Of the prophets of truth and righteousness it has I been written : " These men mustered their powers I amidst the silences." Little wonder, then, that we have few prophets and seers in this busy age. To most, I fear, it can only be an academic truth : "That we can feed this Mind of ours In a wise passiveness." Times of quiet are hard to find, and if found, the habit of reflection, of turning the mind inward upon itself, of communing with one's self in stillness of all other thoughts, has yet to be formed. Those " unmannerly distractions," which Faber found intruding upon the hour of prayer, are with most of us all the time. And yet the duty abides, the call is imperative. Notwithstanding all hindrances, impelled by painful soul-hunger, we must search into the realities of personal experience, and find the sure foundation of the soul's eternal life. So ( we turn with wistful gaze to the saints of old, to | the goodly fellowship of the Mystics, whose testimony has a new significance for us, and whose mystical 1 experience is our secret quest. The significance for religion of this new direction of thought is a more searching question. It is always difficult to determine what is the true 14 The Revival of Mysticism inward meaning of any movement, and to escape the error of taking accidents for essentials is not always easy. Thus, in the case before us, the new interest in Mysticism has, almost certainly, to be included in a wider trend of thought. It is one form of the activity of the historical spirit which would embrace all that is human within its scope. But this will not explain all, for there is quite certainly a deep, religious spirit beneath the move ment. Some years ago the hope was cherished by many that a great creative theologian would appear, who, in the fulness of modern knowledge and the assurance of faith, should once more quicken thought and open a new vision of the eternal Gospel, a hope, however, which has not been realised, though the need which inspired the hope remains. This sense of unrest, dissatisfaction, ' uncertainty, the ever- deepening consciousness of i something lacking in our religious life to-day, and ; the increasing longing for a more vital and spiritual religion, are turning the thoughts of many to the old Mystics and to their writings, if, perchance,, they may learn their secret and know their assurance ; and their peace. Something more than this can be said, and must be, if we are to touch the heart of the matter. Much has been written about the decadence of religion, but there is another side of the shield, 15 Studies in Christian Mysticism brighter and more inspiring. Religion as it becomes less formal may become more intense ; less depen dence upon externals may spring from the fuller enjoyment of the worship which is in spirit and in truth. The mystical experience is by no means a bygone story ; the great leaders of the move ment in the past have their spiritual sons and daughters in our own day. In all the Churches there are those who in gladness and confidence can say " I know Him whom I have believed," a multi tude which no man can number, to whom conscious communion with God, the true mystical experience, is the one reality in their lives. The great Mystics have been named " the pioneers of the spiritual world," and we hold them in honour because of their spiritual pre-eminence. But all who have lived in and for the eternal, whose vision has embraced the realities of the spiritual world are also Mystics, a great company in every age and in every land. True, not all of these, not even many, have been conscious of " that instinct for the Absolute which is latent in man " which, according to Dean Inge, characterises the Mystic ; nor are they, in clear self-knowledge, attempting " to realise in thought and feeling the immanence of the temporal in the eternal, and of the eternal in the temporal," as Mysticism is defined by him — these ideas are too metaphysical for them. Yet 16 The Revival of Mysticism simple souls, in common walks of life, knowing nothing of the culture of the Schools, have lived their lives in conscious communion with the Spiritual World, counting the realities of that world the supreme good. All true religion is based upon the reality of the Spiritual ; and all devout souls live and move and have their being therein. In their lives the spiritual sense has been quickened, the birth from Above is a fact of experience, and life, for them, means an " ever closer and deeper dependence on and appropriation of the fulness of the Divine Life." It is this which vital religion in its full Christian sense always means, and means for all. It is fully recognised that, in religious experience, as in all other departments of life, there are degrees of attainment, and that the great Mystics may be justly styled " the heroic examples of the life of Spirit." What I wish to insist upon is that there is true Mysticism in all vital religion, and, very expressly, in the Christian religion. The assertion that " the spirit of mysticism is the true and essential Christianity " has been objected to as an extreme statement, but such a criticism, as it seems to me, arises either from a wrong idea of Mysticism, or from an inadequate realisation of what is essential Christianity. In his Bampton Lecture (1899), which may claim 17 B Studies in Christian Mysticism to be one of the earliest of the modern critical studies of the subject, Dean Inge gives twenty-six definitions of Mysticism, to which his own, given above, may be added. If every type of Mysticism, Speculative, Religious, Symbolic, is included, these definitions may be multiplied almost indefinitely. By some writers Nature-Mysticism is deemed the highest, and seen in the life of a St. Francis, or breathing in the poetry of a Wordsworth, it is attractive to most minds. To others, Speculative Mysticism is the most absorbing, and Plotinus, whose Mysticism has been characterised as " the ultimate result of the whole development of Greek Philosophy," is counted " the Mystic par excellence." Between Speculative and Religious Mysticism there is this important difference : in philosophic ideas the interest is mainly intellectual and conse quently limited to the few highly-trained minds ; in religious experience the fellowship is personal and may be shared by all. Between Nature-Mysticism and Religious Mysticism there is an underlying unity, for only to the religious spirit, conscious of the Divine within itself, is the vision of the Divine in Nature an inspiration and a joy. It is Religious Mysticism which is now to engage our thought. It is necessary, however, still further to limit our subject, and more definitely to define the term Mysticism. The psychological fact upon which 18 The Revival of Mysticism Religious Mysticism is based, has been thus stated : " Personal religious experience has its root and centre in mystical states of consciousness " (Varieties of Religious Experience, p. 379). To the Mystic, the vital element in his religion is direct and personal j communion with God, religion, that is, " in its most acute, intense, and living stage." Christian Mysticism, in its essential element, is the conscious communion of the soul with God, as revealed in and through Jesus Christ. This definition is based upon the conviction that Christianity is a Life, spiritual, eternal, a Life, from its very nature, essentially mystical. That it is possible to hold correct beliefs about God, and to fulfil all the outward requirements of a ceremonial religion, without living communion with God, is a fact too evident, but this is not even religion in any true sense, and, quite certainly, it is not the spiritual religion of Jesus Christ. Jesus Himself is The Great Mystic — I write these words in deep reverence of spirit — His oneness with the Father, and the oneness of the faithful in Him, constitute the sublimest heights of Mysticism. And the Christian is the disciple, the follower, the imitator of Christ, whose Pre-eminence is not that of isolation but of inspiration, and whose Headship is to reproduce His Life in ours. In this faith we realise that the Christian Scrip- 19 b 2 Studies in Christian Mysticism tures are mystical throughout ; not the Fourth Gospel alone, though that is deep in spiritual thought, but also the other three, in each of which is found the heart- truth of Mysticism : " Whosoever will come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross and follow Me." And not in St. John's First Epistle alone, though the communion of the soul with God who is Love, in love and obedience of life, is therein so richly taught ; but also, and very especially, in the Letters of St. Paul, wherein his Christian experience so deep and full is revealed, and his Gospel for all declared. In his life the words of Jesus, already quoted, find their exact fulfilment in personal experience, as his great mystical saying reveals : "I have been crucified with Christ ; yet I live ; and yet no longer I, but Christ liveth in me " ; and in his gospel there is no less exalted hope for those who truly believe — he knows but one Spirit, one faith, one life, the life which is " hid with Christ in God." The Christian Mystics, then, whose thoughts and Hves we study, were first of all and essentially Christian men and women, the re-discoverers, in their own age, of spiritual religion. Theirs was the vision of God Himself, of God as Love and Light and Spirit, indwelling, inspiring, redeeming ; the Christian faith of the Holy Ghost ; the Christian doctrine of the Immanence of God. 20 CHAPTER II HAVE THE MYSTICS A MESSAGE FOR US ? Is Mysticism an abnormal or a normal element in vital religion ? The question is of supreme import ance, and upon the answer our whole interest in the subject hangs. If the mystical experience in its essential nature is impossible to ordinary religious people, then our interest in it can only be intellectual, and life has other interests and duties which claim us more. I find conflicting answers in the writings of students of the subject. Thus in Miss Underbill's invaluable study we are invited to think of the Mystics as the great explorers of the Spiritual and] to give to them '": the same attention that we give to other explorers of countries in which we are not competent to adventure ourselves ; for the Mystics are the pioneers of the spiritual world, and we have no right to deny validity to their discoveries, merely because we lack the opportunity or the courage necessary to those who would prosecute such explorations for themselves " (pp. 4, 5). Again she .writes : " The Mystics show us this independent spiritual life, this fruition of the Absolute, enjoyed with a 21 Studies in Christian Mysticism fulness to which others cannot attain. They are the heroic examples of the life of the spirit ; just as the great artists, the great discoverers, are the heroic examples of the life of beauty and the life of truth " (p. 41). In each of these passages the statement is qualified, for though we may not be pioneers, cannot indeed be, in a land that has already been explored, yet we may be followers along the same way — if, indeed, we are prepared for the great enterprise. Even though we may not attain to the same fulness of the spiritual life, yet we may follow in the footsteps of the saints. If, then, these passages gave the final conclusion we should have no ground of disagree ment, but the author of Mysticism makes other and far more definite statements. To affirm that " only Mystics can really write about Mysticism " is to sound a much-needed note of warning. The blind cannot appreciate colour. Our anxious question is : are ordinary religious men and women incapacitated by " colour-blind ness " ? Is the mystic sense lacking wholly, or is the religious man, by virtue of his religious consciousness, a seer, if but dimly ? The author leaves us in no doubt as to her own conclusions. The history of Mysticism, she says, " demonstrates plainly enough that there is developed in some men another sort of consciousness, another ' sense ' beyond those normal qualities of the self which we have discussed " 22 Have the Mystics a Message for Us ? (p. 59). She speaks of an " abnormal and highly- sensitised type of mind which we call mystical " (p. 70), a " peculiar mental make-up," so that we may speak of " the born mystic," as we speak of " the born musician and poet " (p. 78). Pressed to their full meaning these statements leave us in no doubt as to the opinion held. The Mystics stand apart, a class to themselves, endowed with powers which are not given to all, which, in fact, are the peculiar inheritance of the few elect souls. For one here and there the study of Mysti cism may prove as the Divine voice calling to the Mount of Vision, but for the rest of us there is nothing left but to walk the common path, and live our life, as best we may, on the lower plains. But is this conclusion justified ? The quotations given seem to be conclusive, but I am not at all sure that we do the author justice by so interpreting them. Had this been her final word I do not think she would have written Mysticism, and certainly it would not have been the really great book it is. It must be of some " accident " of Mysticism and not of its essential quality that such statements are made. Perhaps the following may be accepted as her final judgment : " Just as genius in any of the arts is — humanly speaking — the final term of a power of which each 23 Studies in Christian Mysticism individual possesses the rudiments, so mysticism may be looked upon as the final term, the active expression, of a power latent in the whole race ; the power, that is to say, of so perceiving transcen dent reality. Few people pass through life without knowing what it is to be at least touched by this mystical feeling " (p. 87). In referring to the accidents of Mysticism I have in mind several considerations which are of the utmost importance if we are to come to any true conclusion as to its normal or abnormal character. (1) Due allowance must always be made for the influences of time and place. All our experience is toned by our expectations, determined in great measure by our beliefs. This is true in a marked degree of religious experience. " The actual mystical views of any given period, the symbolism through which these inward experi ences are expressed, the ' revelations ' which come to mystical prophets, all bear the mark and colour of their particular age. There are no ' pure experi ences,' i.e., no experiences which come wholly from beyond the person who has them " (Studies in Mystical Religion p. xxxiv.). There is a very definite allowance which has to be made for the Mysticism of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. That was, in spirit at least, the rise of essential Protestantism in the midst of dominant Catholicism. Men and women trained in a religion of externalism discovered for themselves a direct way to God. For them religion henceforth 24 Have the Mystics a Message for Us ? had " the throb of personal experience in it." Their life stands out in sharp and challenging outline against the spirit of their age. They were no longer merely " Religious," devoted by vows to the practice of rites and ceremonies, they were devout, spiritual men who had personal experience of religion " in its most acute, intense, and living stage." The fact that Priests and People alike made religion a mockery by their irreligious lives served the more to isolate the Mystics from their fellows, to give deeper significance to their experience, and to determine their mission. To St. Catherine of Siena (1347 — 1380) the corruptions of the Church were her Cross, and her life-work was to restore the spiritual power of the Church. " Holy Church," she wrote, " should return to her first condition — poor, humble, and meek. For ever since the Church has aimed more at temporal than at spiritual things it has gone from bad to worse " (Letters, pp. 119 — 121). From her writings we learn that " moral corruption was rampant in the convents and monasteries, amongst men and women alike " (Gardner's Saint Catherine of Siena, p. 3). The evidence of Thomas a Kempis is to the same effect. In his book, The Founders of the New Devotion, and writing of Gerard the Great (1340 — 1384), he says : 25 Studies in Christian Mysticism " Now at that time particularly the disposition of the world seemed to be on all sides turned to evil, so that there were few who preached the Word of Life both by example and precept, and fewer still who followed the rule of continency " (p. 9). This isolation of character and inevitable antago nism to the irreligion of the day could not fail to affect the life and thought of the devout. One good resulted — many of the Mystics, far from being " recluses," out of touch with affairs, shut up to the enjoyment of their own devotion, were active and aggressive, reformers before the Refor mation, and their thoughts could not fail to be moulded by their mission. I do not say that this antagonism caused them to exaggerate their own religious experience, but it could not fail to make them realise more vividly the value of personal piety, and to speak and write of the new devotion in terms which could not fail to sound strange in their own age and which have not wholly lost that note for ours. (2) The spirit of the age must always influence thought — but allowance must also be made for peculiarities of disposition. Principal Lindsay, in his History of the Reformation, supplies a very good illustration of this personal equation. Writing of St. Ignatius (1491 — 1556), he says : " This intensity of the Spanish character, this 26 Have the Mystics a Message for Us ? temperament distinguished by force rather than moderation, easily gave birth to superstition and burning devotion, and both furnished a fruitful soil for the extravagances of Mysticism, which affected every class in society " (II. p. 530). St. Ignatius himself was carried away by his own passionate enthusiasm. " He believed that he could actually see with bodily eyes divine mysteries which the intelligence could not comprehend." " He felt assured he could see the mystery of Tran- substantiation actually taking place." For him " the Incarnation of our Lord, the Holy Trinity, the personality of Satan, were translated into visible symbols which made them plainly under stood." The influence of St. Ignatius was far-reaching. He is thought of mainly as the founder of the Society of Jesus, but he was a true mystic. His spiritual experience, as Dr. Lindsay shows, was almost identical with Luther's. " The words used by the two great religious leaders were different, but the experience of pardon won by throwing one's self upon the mercy of God was the same." St. Teresa (15-15— 1582), and through her St. John of the Cross (1542 — 1591), were greatly influenced by the life of St. Ignatius, and in reading their writings we reahse over and over again the importance of making due allowances for peculiarities of disposition. But there is a more evident direction in which 27 Studies in Christian Mysticism this caution must be observed. Ecstasy and Mysticism have been very closely related, indeed the two terms are sometimes used interchangeably, as representing that " transport of feeling in which thought and will are merged." In the lives of some of the Mystics we are con fronted again and again with abnormal experiences. We are told of visions and voices and external signs. The " ecstasy " of the Mystics is counted a supreme favour, and their abnormal experience is one ground of their canonisation. It is quite certain that among the really great Mystics there have been men and women of exceptional and quite extra ordinary " psychic " powers. Probably we touch here one of the reasons, perhaps the chief reason, why the Mystics, as such, are thought of as possessing some " sense " or " faculty " over and above the common endowment. The more, therefore, does it need to be asserted with all possible emphasis that the possession of extraordinary powers has no essential relation to Religious Mysticism. There have been Mystics who were also " Psychics," but there have also been Mystics innumerable who were not. The conscious posses sion of these strange powers is certainly rare, and if their exercise is bound up inseparably with Mysticism then is it indeed abnormal, and may well be distrusted by devout souls. We may indeed rejoice that 28 Have the Mystics a Message for Us ? while " psychic " gifts are rare, the mystical experience belongs to " the multitude which no man can number." (3) In one remarkable gift the Mystics who are best known to us are indeed pre-eminent — they possessed the literary gift, the gift of expression. They could interpret their experience, and so quicken and illuminate the experience of others. Miss Underbill's illustrations are suggestive. There is a genius of the Artist, the Poet, the Musician, a genius unshared by the ordinary man. But wherein is the genius ? It is not the Artist alone, the great landscape painter, who gazes entranced upon the sunset glory. It is not the Poet alone who has felt " a presence which disturbed him with the joy of elevated thought." In this experience many share who cannot be credited with " genius " in any measure. The genius of the Painter and the Poet lies in this — they are able to interpret and express the transcendent vision, the conscious emotion, the hidden experience, and communicate it in colour and in song. Even so is it in Religion. The uniqueness of the great Mystics was not in their experience, but in their gift of telling the vision, rare gift as it often was. " It is one grace," writes St. Teresa, " that our Lord gives grace ; it is another grace to understand what grace and what gift it is ; and it is another and further grace 29 Studies in Christian Mysticism to have the power to describe and explain it to others " (Life of St. Teresa, p. 136). Here, I think, we discover the special power of the great Mystics whose writings supply the basis of our study. They were men and women of excep tional gifts, both of thought and of expression. No one can read The Imitation or St. Augustine's Confessions without realising that a master-mind speaks. These books rank amongst the world's treasures. But the " uniqueness " is not so much in the religious experience of the writers as in their ability to tell the story. Thomas a Kempis was one of a large brotherhood of like-minded men, and what has made his name to stand out so markedly was not that he alone of all the brotherhood had the mystic experience, the deep, rich, personal religious life of The Imitation, but that his, pre-eminently, was the gift of writing. He was the ready scribe of the Community, the historian and the preacher. There was another a Kempis, an elder brother, John, to whom Thomas went for guidance and instruction, but of John a Kempis we know very little, for his was not the gift of writing. So has it ever been ; behind the outstanding figures, the leaders and teachers, there have always been a body of believers, men and women of the devout life, Mystics as truly as these better-known saints. 30 Have the Mystics a Message for Us ? We read the Confessions with wonder and reverence. By all Mystics of a later age St. Augustine has been looked up to as to a great Master. But behind his life was another, as rich in vital religion, and even in visions of the Lord, the saintly Monica, whose tender, trustful prayers for her son stir our hearts to tears. In that hour when mother and son stood together " seeking between themselves, in the presence of the Truth, of what nature the eternal life of the saints would be," we know that not St. Augustine alone but the Mother Saint as truly as her son must be numbered with the great Mystics. Together they passed into a very ecstasy of joy so that " the very highest pleasure of the carnal sense, and that in the very brightest material light, seemed by reason of the sweetness of that life not only not worthy of comparison, but not even of mention, we lifting ourselves with a more ardent affection towards ' the Self-same ' did gradually pass through all corporeal things, and even the heaven itself, where sun, and moon, and stars shine upon the earth ; yea, we soared higher yet by inward musing and discoursing, and admiring Thy works ; and we came to our own minds and went beyond them, that we might advance as high as that region of unfailing plenty, where Thou feedest Israel for ever with the food of truth, and where life is that Wisdom by whom all 3i Studies in Christian Mysticism these things are made, both which have been and which are to come." The Mother shared the experience, but the Son tells the vision. We know of certain of the Mystics through their writings, but behind the known, and often in closest fellowship with them, were the unknown saints, unknown and unnamed for the most part, who shared the deeper faith and the fuller life. Every great religious movement has had its prophets, whose special gifts of leadership and of utterance have brought them enduring fame, but behind them has been the great company of the faithful, whose fellowship of faith has made possible the prophet's mission. 33 CHAPTER III THE ABNORMAL IN MYSTICISM The questions discussed in the last chapter are of such vital importance to a true understanding of Mysticism, that we must return to them again. Unless we can come to some definite conclusion as to the place and meaning for the Mystics themselves, and for us, of the abnormal in their experience, we shall fail to profit by our study of the subject generally. For my own part I accept this statement : " The downright ecstatics and hearers of voices and seers of visions have all, wherever we are able to trace their temperamental and neural constitu tion and. history, possessed and developed a defi nitely peculiar psycho-physical organisation " (The Mystical Element of Religion, II., p. 42). The discussion by Baron von Hugel of these psycho physical and temperamental questions is most illuminating. He speaks with the authority of profound knowledge, and with the religious sympathy of a devout Catholic. I propose to ask this question : What do the Mystics themselves say about their abnormal 33 c Studies in Christian Mysticism (i) In some cases they warn us against reading a sensuous meaning into their accounts of voices and visions. This may be best illustrated from The Life of St. Teresa of Jesus, written by herself. To St. Teresa " locutions " were an ordinary occurrence in her life, and she discusses them very fully. " A real locution " — she writes — " is nothing else but a word uttered by one, and listened to by another," and from which it is impossible to turn away attention. " The words are very distinctly formed ; but by the bodily ear they are not heard. They are, however, much more clearly understood than they would be if they were heard by the ear " (p. 214). Then, as to visions, which also were of frequent occurrence, she writes : " I was in prayer one day, when I saw Christ close by me, or, to speak more correctly, felt Him ; for / saw nothing with the eyes of the body, nothing with the eyes of the soul. He seemed to me to be close beside me ; and I saw, too, as I believe, that it was He who was speaking to me. The vision was not imaginary ; I saw no form " (p. 233). St. Teresa writes with great, even surprising wisdom of these voices and visions, but the essential matter is her clear knowledge that these were not outward and sensuous, but inward and spiritual. I believe she would have us interpret in the same way all her special visitations, though she does not always repeat her caution. Thus when she tells 34 The Abnormal in Mysticism how, on one occasion, when holding in her hand the Cross of her rosary, the Lord took it from her into His own hand, and returned it, " but it was then four large stones incomparably more precious than diamonds, "[and so it always appeared to her from that time. She adds : "I never saw the wood of which it was made, but only the precious stones. They were seen, however, by no one else — only by myself " (p. 262). I take this last statement as giving the key to the whole story. No one else would have seen the transference of the Cross — the whole was in the realm of spirit. In contrast we may turn to the story she tells of one whom she revered as a saint : " A year before his death," she writes, " he appeared to me, being far away. I knew he was about to die, and so I sent him word to that effect, when he was some leagues from here. When he died, he appeared to me, and said that he was going to his rest. I did not believe it. I spoke of it to some persons, and within eight days came the news that he was dead — or, to speak more correctly, he had begun to live for evermore " (p. 244). This story will not surprise those who are familiar with the records of The Society for Psychical Research. If we may read into the words " appeared to me" their significance in similar stories, then we may say that St. Teresa knew quite well what a seeming objective vision was, and her clear denial of 35 C2 Studies in Christian Mysticism any such objectivity, whether real or apparent, in her religious experiences is the more significant. (2) The Mystics affirm that all abnormal experi ences must be severely tested. It is indeed a painful side of our study of this subject to find how devout souls were tortured by the fear that their voices and visions might be of Satanic origin. " Satan very quickly betrays himself," is St. Teresa's opinion, but it was not the confident assurance of many others. The decisive test in St. Teresa's experience she declares to have been this : " The words formed by the understanding effect nothing ; but, when our Lord speaks, it is at once word and work " (p. 215). It will be noticed that auto-suggestion was fully recognised by St. Teresa as a possible source of her locutions. It is in this direction that many will turn for a full explanation of all these experiences. But I cannot accept it as such. It leaves out of account the essential element in the experience : the overmastering sense of an authority not of self. It begs the whole question of the reality of a Spiritual World, and of God. The spiritual guides and teachers of Mysticism knew better, but just because they knew that there was a Power, or Powers, not ourselves, they insisted upon " trying the spirits, whether they be of God." Walter Hilton (ob. 1396), whose Scale of Perfection 36 The Abnormal in Mysticism ought to be read by all students of our subject, urges this very searching test of all feelings and voices and visions. What is their effect — do they cause delight in themselves, and the longing for their return, or do they make the soul more devout, more fervent in prayer, more wise to think spiritual thoughts, more full of love to God and love to neighbour, and more lowly minded (pp. 14, 15) ? So, too, in the matter of bodily penance, the extremes of which have ever been the chief cause of all manner of delusions, he urges discretion, saying " the mean is the best " (p. 32). (3) The argument can be carried a step further. These experiences are not to be relied upon, not to be sought, not even to be desired ; they are a hindrance, not a help, to spiritual life. This counsel is urged by Father Baker (1575 — 1641) with great force : " As for extraordinary supernatural inspirations, illuminations, apparitions, voices, conversations with spirits, messages from heaven, etc., a spiritual internal liver is forbidden to pretend to, or so much as desire them ; yes, rather to pray against them, lest he should abuse them to vanity and pride." (Holy Wisdom, p. 72). But it is to St. John of the Cross we must turn for the most emphatic direction. (The quotations are from his Ascent of Mount Carmel.) Writing of 37 Studies in Christian Mysticism sense perceptions of an extraordinary character, he says : " Though all these may happen to the bodily senses in the way of God, we must never rely on them, nor encourage them. Yea, rather we must fly from them, without examining whether they be good or evil " (p. 104). Even of mental images and forms he says : " The soul must not willingly accept them, nor rest upon them " (p. 136). " He who shall now desire to know anything by extraordinary supernatural ways, implies a defect in God, as if He has not given us enough when He gave us His only Son " (p. 186). " One good work, or act of the will, wrought in charity is more precious in the eyes of God than that which all the visions and revelations of heaven might effect. Many souls, to whom visions have never come, are incomparably more advanced in the way of perfection than others to whom many have been given " (p. 195). (4) So we reach our final conclusion. These abnor mal experiences are not of the essence of Mysticism. All that is vital is found apart from them. The proof of this is found in the Mystics themselves. Thomas a Kempis (1380 — 1471) has been classed as a " half-mystic," and if, indeed, the perfect Mystic is " one who relies upon the Inner Light and shuts his eyes to facts, " we may rightly rejoice in his imperfection. But Thomas a Kempis was a religious Mystic, and was recognised as such by 38 The Abnormal in Mysticism Mystics themselves. The Imitation was one of the books which, according to St. Teresa's Constitutions, every Prioress was bound to provide for her Convent. Its author is a notable instance of Mysticism freed from all confusion of voices and visions. True he had three visions of a remarkable character, but their character is clearly indicated. One sentence in the story of each gives the key : " While he was resting on his bed, behold ! " " One night he saw himself in a dream seated with other students. . . . " " He saw in the heavens. . . . And immediately in his sleep he heard. ..." The Imitation is a mystical guide. It has the faults of its age, or rather the limitations of its time and place, but it has spoken and 'will continue to speak to the devout in all ages. Ranking with the Imitation we place Theologia Germanica, of which Luther wrote : " Next to the Bible and St. Augustine, no book hath ever come into my hands from which I have learnt more of what God and Christ and Man and all things are." To these I would add The Cloud of Unknowing — one sentence from which gives us the very heart of mystical teaching : "By love He may be gotten and holden, but by thought or understanding never." In these writings it is not in visions and ecstasies that true religion is found, but in the Kingdom within, the life with God and in God. 39 Studies in Christian Mysticism This was the unwearying witness of Tauler, the great preacher of the mystical way. To him the religion of experience was all in all ; in his sermon on the Feast of St. Augustine, under the text : " Watch ye. therefore, because you know not what hour your Lord will come," he sounds the deepest note of Mysticism : " This marriage, from which the Lord comes, is in the very innermost parts of the soul, where the Image of God is. The nearness of the soul to God, and of God to the soul, the wonderful works God does there, and the joy and delight which God has there, are beyond all reason and understanding ; although man himself knows nothing and feels nothing thereof. But the men in whom God thus (rejoices, and with whom He thus unites Himself, are the men who have turned with all their hearts : and all their desires to God, away from the world and all creatures, and who ever desire to live only unto Him." But it is useless to press the argument further. If to these names we add those of Walter Hilton and Father Baker, whose clear testimony we have already given, we have a band of Mystics, saintly, wise, and richly endowed, whose combined witness is conclusive. The mystical experience, in its essence, is wholly independent of any and every form of " ecstasy." It is a spiritual quest, and a spiritual experience, the quest of God, and the finding, say rather the being found, oi Him. 40 The Abnormal in Mysticism Every sincere Christian is a Mystic, and must be, if his religion is not mere formalism. Men and women, poor it may be in this world's riches, ignorant of its wisdom, but " rich towards God," and wise in faith, know in personal experience the peace, the joy, the hope which the Mystics counted the supreme good. I recall, in wonder and in reverence, the simple faith, the clear vision, the abounding hope of a poor man, almost blind, blind to the glory of this world but seeing the unseen with eyes undimmed ; I hear him again in prayer, how near God was to him, how intimate their fellowship, what flights of eloquence, what wealth of imagery, what child- likeness of simple trust ! He was the one great Mystic whom I have personally known. Would that our Churches numbered more such saints ! They do number many in their ranks, and these, be they few or many, are the salt of the Church, keeping it still sweet and Christian. , " The Church can never get rid of the mystic spirit ;. nor should she attempt to do so, for it is, in fact, her life. It is another name for Conscience, for freedom, for the rights of the individual soul, for the grace and privilege of direct access to the Redeemer, for the presence of the Divine Spirit in the heart " (Unity in Diversity, Dr. Bigg, p. 93). 41 CHAPTER IV I THE MYSTIC WAY The treatment of this subject in Miss Underbill's Mysticism is very full. Considerably more than half the book is devoted to it. Her reading has been very wide, and her conclusion, which may be accepted absolutely, is that " no one Mystic can be discovered in whom all the observed characteristics of the transcendental consciousness are resumed, and who can on that account be treated as typical " (p. 204). This fact is most significant. All the observed characteristics are not essential, and our aim must be to discover the common factors, the underlying unity of experience. The books of the Mystics were written for the guidance and help of disciples. In some cases, the authors tell the story of their own religious life, how they found God. These mystical writings are always the most interesting, though even these require to be read with some reserve. An experience is one thing, but the statement of an experience is almost always coloured. Seldom is the narrative contemporaneous with the experience. Reflection, and the ruling purpose of edification, are apt to over emphasise and even to distort simple facts. 42 The Mystic Way In other cases mystical writings have been pre pared as manuals of devotion, based, no doubt, upon their author's experience, but written in more general terms. These are open to the danger of formalism. They frequently evidence the study of earher writings, and are coloured by the accepted " system " of their time. This was especially true of the " Speculative " Mystics. The influence of Plotinus was far reaching. It entered into and dominated Christian thought for many centuries, through the writings of the Pseudo- Dionysius. Through this " anonymous, mysterious man " the Neoplatonic philosophy " was brought over into the Church, and became ' spiritual bee- bread ' for many centuries " (Studies in Mysticism, p. 98). Scholastic speculation coloured all mystical writings. The religion of experience became syste- matised, and only when the influence of Dionysius ceased to control thought, did the imitation of Christ, and the religion of His Apostles, become again paramount. If, then, we would enter into the inheritance of the faith we must get behind and beneath this specula tive element, and all formal " cataloguing of stages of experience," to the common and essential religion .2 of experience. The division of the religious life into three stages, purgative, illuminative, unitive, is found in most of 43 Studies in Christian Mysticism the mystical writers. The soul must be cleansed and enlightened in order that it may be united with God. The tendency to systematise is seen even in the Theologia Germanica, where the " three stages by which a man is led upwards till he attaineth true perfection " are again sub-divided. " The purification concerneth those who are beginning or repenting, and is brought to pass in a threefold wise : by contrition and sorrow for sin, by full confession, by hearty amendment. The enlighten ment belongeth to such as are growing, and also taketh place in three ways : to wit, by the eschewal of sin, by the practice of virtue and good works, and by the willing endurance of all manner of temptation and trials. The union belongeth to such as are perfect, and also is brought to pass in three ways : to wit, by pureness and singleness of heart, by love, and by the contemplation of God, the Creator of all things " (Ch. XIV.). This sub-division is not followed, indeed it is not found, in the edition which Luther used. The aim of the author is really to simplify, rather than systematise. He reduces all to the denial of self-will, and the exercise of love. It is in " the self, the I, the Me, the Mine, that is, self-seeking and selfish ness," he finds the root of all evil. " If there were no self-will there would be no Devil and no Hell." The doing of the Will of God is life and joy — " I would fain be to the Eternal Goodness what his own hand is to a man." And this Will is ever and in all 44 The Mystic Way things, Love. " Knowledge and light profit nothing without Love." The threefold division can thus be reduced to a twofold : e.g., Mortification and Prayer, as was done by many. I There must be detachment, the breaking away from all lusts of the flesh, and attachment, the fixing of the soul in goodness and in God. Thus Eckhart in his sermon on Sanctification says : — " Ways of living are many ; one lives thus, and another thus ; but whosoever will reach the highest life, let him in a few words hear the conclu sion of the whole matter : Keep thyself clear of all men, keep thyself from all imaginations that crowd upon the mind, free thyself from all that is contingent, entangling, and cumbersome, and direct thy mind always to gazing upon God in thy heart, with a steadfast look that never wavers." More helpful, I think, is the testimony of Gerson, accepted and enforced by Molinos, in The Spiritual Guide : " Though I have spent forty years in reading and prayer, yet I could never find any more effectual way for attaining to Mystical Theology than that the spirit should become as a young child or as a beggar in the presence of God." This brings our thought more into line with our Christian Scriptures, which must be our best guide in spiritual life. The turning away from all self- trust and self-will, from all sin, and the turning to 45 Studies in Christian Mysticism God in reverence and obedience and love, is the life to which we are called. And this is one act of the whole man ; an act not done " once for all," but repeated over and over again, all through life, in ever-deepening reality. The " Scale " in Music is a natural division of sound, but Music is found in harmony. So, in the religious experience, while it is possible and useful to speak of several notes, yet in actual experience, these are blended, and it is the harmony which is known. In mental philosophy it is useful to classify the powers of mind, as reason, affection, will ; but in every movement of the self, it is the whole self which acts. So in religious experience, the great stages are never isolated ; they run into one another, not always in equal proportions, and in some measure the soul is being cleansed, and enlightened, and unified in every spiritual movement. It is the recognition of this fact which gives to the Imitation its pre-eminent place. Human nature varies so much in every way that it is quite impossible to lay down rules for uni versal guidance. " The wind bloweth where it listeth." " The city lieth four-square " with gates on every side, and — may we not add ? — with paths innumerable leading to them. " There are as many ways to Heaven as there are blades of grass pointing upwards." 46 The Mystic Way It is good, therefore, to find that there are Mystical Guides who do not insist upon all treading one path. Thus Father Baker writes : — " The instructor's office is not to teach his own way nor indeed any determined way of prayer, etc., but to instruct his disciples how they may them selves find out the way proper for them." (Holy Wisdom, p. 85). " Such is the inexplicable variety of internal dispositions that the same course and order in all things will scarce save any two souls " (p. 88). In The Scale of Perfection, which would well repay fuller examination in this connection, Walter Hilton says : — " Not that I would by these discourses limit God's working by the law of my speaking, as to say that God worketh thus in a soul and no otherwise. No, I mean not so, but I speak after my simple feeling that our Lord worketh thus in some creatures as I conceive. And I hope well also that He worketh otherwise, which passeth my wit and my feeling " (P- 235)- The same spirit is found in Richard Rolle (1300 — 1349), " the earliest in time of our famous English Mystics." (\After giving a form of words to hold in thought at all times — he adds : ) " Or if thou hast other thoughts, that thou hast more sweetness in and devotion than in those that I teach thee, thou may'st think them. For I hope that God will put such thoughts in thine heart as 47 / Studies in . Christian Mysticism He is pleased with^and as thou art ordained for " (The Form of Perfect Living, p. 45). The lowly spirit of these early English Mystics is very marked. There is no trace of mere personal authority or dictatorship in their writings. It is as " fellow-helpers to the truth " they desire to be received. "If it do thee good and profit to thee, thank God, and pray for me " (The Form of Perfect Living, p. 79). It is quite possible, therefore, to make too much of these formal divisions. They are important, but should be used to help and not fetter the spiritual life. The better way, however, is to try to get at the very heart of mystic experience, and of this we are never left in doubt. With one voice all the Religious Mystics set forth " Love " as the crown of perfection, the fruition of all beatitude, " God is love ; and he that abideth in love abideth in God, and God abideth in him." To understand and interpret aright this great truth of God's essential character, and of the soul's fellowship with God, is the highest wisdom. Mystical Theology has been named " the science of love, by which the divine verities are not only learned, but at the same time are relished also." This is the definition of St. John of the Cross in his Spiritual Canticle of The Soul and The Bridegroom Christ, which, as its title indicates, is based upon " The Song of Solomon." This love song has been, and is still, 48 The Mystic Way very dear to the heart of saintly men and women, and it has coloured, in some cases almost dominated, the writings of some Mystics, to their hurt, and our distaste. It is always a satisfaction to find this symbol ignored. For even St. John of the Cross does not wholly escape extravagances. Thus he writes : " An instant of pure love is more precious in the eyes of God and the Soul, and more profitable to the Church, than all other good works together " (p. 223). We turn with satisfaction from this thought to the words of a greater St. John : " This is the love of God, that we keep His commandments." Love active, expressed in service, is surely more than love inactive, absorbed in its own rapture. Our own English Mystic, Richard Rolle, has in glowing words described What Love is and works : " Love is a burning yearning after God, with a wonderful delight and certainty." " Love is a life, joining together the loving and the loved." " Love makes us one with God. Love is the beauty of all virtues." " Love is a stirring of the soul for to love God for Himself, and all other things for God." " Truth may be without love ; but it cannot help without it. Love is a perfection of learning, virtue of prophecy, fruit of truth, help of sacraments, establishing of wit and knowledge ; riches of pure men ; life of dying men " (The Form of Perfect Living, pp. 55—57)- 49 D Studies in Christian Mysticism Here, then, is the harmony of the three notes of the Mystic Scale— for love at once purifies, illumines, and unites the soul to God. It is " the expulsive power of a new affection," which drives out all unrighteousness. This is the essential Gospel : it is " the goodness of God which leadeth to repen tance." This way of true holiness is definitely taught by Spiritual Guides ; but it is implied in their reverence of " The Sacred Humanity," and their insistent requirement of meditation upon the Life and the Passion of Jesus Christ. Here, again, I quote from Richard Rolle, though I have other references before me. He writes : " If thou wilt be well with God, and have grace to rule thy life, and come to the joy of love : this name Jesus, fasten it so fast in thy heart that it come never out of thy thought. ... If thou thinkest Jesus continually, and holdest it firmly, it purges thy sin, and kindles thine heart ; it clarifies thy soul, it removes anger and does away slowness. ... It opens heaven, and makes a contemplative man " (The Form of Perfect Living, p. 53). This, then, as I read the story, is the message of the Mystics to all who would enter into their secret peace and joy — they bid us think, and meditate, and pray. They tell us that the Great Reality, God, is known in silence ; that His Holy Place is in the soul, and that to get alone with God is the way of life. They bid us hold before the mind the Jesus of the 50 The Mystic Way Gospel story, if we would know, in truth, the mind and will of God, the Love whichGod is. This " free dom of the will," at least, we have : we can hold Jesus before the mind and prolong the consideration of Him . How truth is vitalised is God's secret . ' ' Man cannot without God ; God may not without man." The Mystics divide life into two — the Active, and the Contemplative, and their books were written, for the most part, for the guidance of Contemplatives. To withdraw themselves from all secular life, and , even from the office of the Priesthood, seemed good and wise to them. We need not discuss their duties, enough that we know and do our own. But this must be said — it is not to Contemplatives alone that the mystic experience belongs. Jesus Himself lived the " Active " life. The great missionary Apostle was no " Contemplative," and shall we say that St. Paul did not attain to the " Unitive " Life ? " Not that I have already obtained, or am already made perfect : but I press on " — that is the true Christian Perfection, in this life certainly — the per fection of unceasing endeavour. There are, and must be, degrees of attainment, but the measure of this is not in visible expression, but in inward purpose, in love, and the truth holds still : " much forgiveness, much love." But the law abides : without " contemplation " there can be no spiritual progress, and no depth and 51 D2 Studies in Christian Mysticism warmth of religious experience. Here, for us, is the opening of the mystic way. We must find time for quiet thought. The need for this is well known and often spoken of. We are so pre-occupied, " lost among the stuff " of life. Business and politics and pleasures fill life to overflowing. Even the Church can find no place for Prayer. Organisations are innumerable, and what with running these, and run ning here and everywhere to fulfil engagements, even our spiritual leaders have scarce time left for true meditation. " Clergymen are often tempted by the devil to turn their meditation into a work of sermon- making " (Ara Coeli, p. 72, note). Yet it is to the ministers of the Churches, our preachers and teachers, we look for leadership in this movement, and that they may lead, they must set the example of serious devotion. The true note of Mysticism must be heard in their sermons. Out of a deepened hfe they alone can hope to quicken the deeper life in others. Not by exhortation however earnest, nor by exposition however lucid, will they lead their people along the mystic way, but by them selves entering therein. Only as they see the Vision of God can they reveal it. Only as they themselves are purified and illumined and made one with God will they draw their hearers into His Presence and kindle the fire that flames forth in prayer and faith, and glows in works of holy love. 52 The Mystic Way In all the Churches there are faithful men and women who earnestly desire for themselves and for the whole Church a revival of spiritual religion, and who are looking to their spiritual Leaders with wistful eyes to lead them into the larger life of fuller faith and richer experience. 53 CHAPTER V MYSTICAL THEOLOGY Is the mystical consciousness limited to the verifying and vitalising of truth already received, or are new revelations given ? The importance of this question cannot well be over-estimated. It is the common confession of all saintly souls that goodness is ever and always of God, " the fruit of the Spirit." It is in this sense we are to interpret the oft-quoted and usually misunderstood phrase in the General Confession : " There is no i health in us," i.e., there is no self-healing, no healing power in and of ourselves. "And every virtue we possess, And every victory won, And every thought of holiness, Are His alone." ' Even so also is it of Truth. All knowledge is a communication of the Divine Mind. In the realms of Science itself there is no " logic of discovery." New ideas are given to thought, rather than won by thinking. What is told us of Herbert Spencer is of great interest in this connection. 54 Mystical Theology " His inactive disposition recoiled from the notion of wrestling with a problem in an attempt to solve it. Whenever he was confronted with a problem whose solution was not obvious to him he would push it aside, and abandon all conscious effort to solve it. But the matter would not usually be entirely lost sight of ; it would stick in the back of his mind, and by and by, very likely while thinking of something else, a little inward flash would occur, rendering the solution somewhat less obscure than it was before. With the lapse of time other flashes would follow ; and after several years, maybe, the solution of that problem would be set forth with the marvellous lucidity that Spencer commanded, as an integral portion of his system of philosophy " (Letters of J. S. Mill, Intro. p. xxviii). This, we shall be told, is the working of the sub-conscious self. But this only puts the problem further back. A name is not an explanation, though it too often ranks as such. At the sight of some new wonder we exclaim " Manna ! " — ¦ What is it ? — and are satisfied that we know. Intuition, insight, uprushes of clear thought are known to us all, but their secret springs are hidden from us. Truth flashes upon the mind, comes as a surprise, not unfrequently as an unwelcome surprise, conflicting with prejudices and cherished beliefs. In our moral judgments this is a constant experience. Duty appeals to us, not as self- selected, but as commanded, and with a personal 55 Studies in Christian Mysticism emphasis as of another and higher Self — " Ye have not chosen Me, but I have chosen you." In this wider .sense, Mysticism enters into the whole of life. There is a mystical element in all moral judgments, and in all intellectual apprehen sions of truth. The Divine Spirit quickens all human powers, thought, feeling, will. But our concern now is with Christian Mysticism, as imme diate, conscious communion with God in and through Christ, and, for this religious experience, belief that God is, and knowledge of the historic Jesus, are essential conditions. In this experience the vital element is the sense of God's Presence, a sense varying, indeed, in degree, from an arresting sense of a Personal Will other and higher than our own, to the full rapture of holy love. In this mystic consciousness the impres sion is not that of new truth, but of the supreme value of all truth, and the august authority of all righteousness. The great ends of life receive Divine Sanction, and all motives are resolved into the Will of God. The thoughts of the heart are cleansed, and the soul's vision of religious truth, in its moral significance, is enlarged and strengthened. In so far, then, as religious insight is dependent upon character, the mystical experience, by en riching character does also enrich the knowledge | of truth, but it is ever of truth as life. Communion 56 Mystical Theology with God is the inspiration of spiritual life, not'1 the strengthening of the reasoning faculties. The ¦ mystical consciousness provides the dynamic of faith, not the skill of the logician. While, then, ' there is no " Mystic-Creed " as such, yet there are j important truths which are known in fuller, richer i measure by the Mystics, and which are enforced \ by them in all their writings. Limiting our consideration of Mysticism to its religious and Christian phase, we shall find that two great subjects of thought stand out pre-eminently : God, and the Soul, in their essential moral nature, and in their relation to one another. If the witness ' of the Mystics is indeed true, and man can come into direct, conscious communion with God, this fact alone must have deep significance. Speculative Mysticism finds its delight in this theme, and has not escaped the errors of Pantheism, in its doctrine of God ; and Deification, in its conception of man. But this speculative philosophy is not integral to Religious Mysticism. Were these high realms of thought to be climbed by all who would attain to " perfection," then must hopeless despair paralyse endeavour for most of us. What has been said of one, is true in measure of all Philoso phic Mystics : "It seems as if in ascending Plotinus had drawn up the ladder after him, and left himself no possibility of descending again" (Caird's Evolution 57 Studies in Christian Mysticism of Theology in the Greek Philosophers, p. 253). Certainly there is no ladder left by which simple souls may ascend. It was only as Mysticism became emancipated from Neo-Platonism, and from Scholasticism, and returned to the earliest sources of Christian thought and life, that it is : seen as a simple, yet practical, religion of experience, : the life " hid with Christ in God." And this life is not exceptional, abnormal, but life in its fulness and joy, only to be understood as it is known, and never able to be explained or adequately expressed. " What this opening of the spiritual eye is, the greatest scholar on earth cannot imagine by his wit nor show fully by his tongue ; for it cannot be gotten by study, nor by man's industry alone, but principally by grace of the Holy Ghost, and with human industry " (The Scale of Perfection, p. 273). Accepting this limitation we may consider the two great truths underlying the soul's vital experience of God. (1) Of God. — The testimony of the Mystics as to the nature of God can be summed up in the two great sayings : " God is Spirit " ; " God is Love." How these are known must be evident from the very nature of the religious experience. God is known in direct fellowship with the soul, known, that is, as Spirit, by the spirit which man is. God is known as Love, by the love which alone brings the soul 58 Mystical Theology into fellowship with Him, and by the Grace of Condescension which makes such fellowship with sinful man possible. It would be easy to find in the writings of all the Christian Mystics glowing sentences in which these truths of God are declared. I have already given some extracts enforcing the human side of this truth — that love alone knows God. The ground of this love is seen in God Himself. " Contemplation is a wonderful joy of God's love " (Rolle). God is " The Living Fountain of Goodness " (Catherine of Genoa). Richard of St. Victor writes thus : " In this state a man's soul feeleth God so sweet, so merciful, so good, so courteous, so true, and so kind, so faithful, so lovely, and so homely, that he leaveth nothing in him that he offereth not it clearly, freely, and homely unto Him " (The Cell of Self-knowledge, p. n). Such joy in God, so rich and full, can only be in God as Love. Reference has already been made to the danger of so pressing the love-symbols of Marriage, and of the Bride and Bridegroom, as to repel, rather than inspire devotion. There is a corresponding danger of thinking and speaking of Divine Love as weak and sentimental. But deep religious experience saves from this error. The vision of God brings true self-knowledge. This is emphasised by many of the Mystics. Thus, Richard of St. Victor writes : 59 Studies in Christian Mysticism " When a soul, by the grace of God and long travail, is come to feeling of ghostly joy in God, then it feeleth that sin hath been the cause of the delaying thereof" (p. 22). "When thou feelest continually thine heart desire after the love of God, then, by the light of His grace that He sendeth in thy reason, thou mayest see both thine own un- worthiness and His great goodness " (p. 30). Further evidence of this truth is found in the stern rebukes of " the sin of presumption," and of all spiritual pride and self-righteousness, and in the demand for humility before God, in which all Mystical Guides unite. To claim any good as of self " toucheth God in His honour." This is the spirit throughout of the Theologia Germanica, and of the Imitation. Indeed the grace of humility is pressed so urgently, that it has seemed to some an unmanning of the self, a self-abasement altogether too abject. But this is to do these great souls grave injustice, and to miss altogether the deep significance of their teaching. It is the intense, even passionate realisa tion of the Love of God, which inspires and compels humility before God. All must be read in the spirit of a prayer so tender and trustful as this : " Blessed be Thou my God ; for although I be unworthy of any benefits : yet Thy nobleness and infinite kindness never ceases to do good even to the ungrateful and to those who are turned away far from Thee. Turn Thou us unto Thee, that we may 60 Mystical Theology be thankful, humble and devout ; for Thou art our salvation, our courage and our strength " (Imitation, Bk. IV, Ch. VIII.). One further testimony must be given, and again from one of our own English Mystics. Amongst the re-issues of the books of the Mystics, that of the Revelation of Divine Love, Recorded by Julian, Anchoress at Norwich, A.D. 1373, is especially welcome. Little is known of the outer life of the Lady Julian. She speaks of herself as "a simple creature, that cowde no letter " (unskilled in letters), and if we are to understand that she was an uneducated woman, then she is a truly remark able illustration of " the genius " to which reference has previously been made. She certainly was a literary genius, with a rare gift of expression. Her Revelation is the story of the Answers to her three desires, and especially to the third, which she tells us was " a mighty desire to receive three wounds in my life : that is to say, the wound of very con trition, the wound of kind compassion, and the wound of steadfast longing towards God " (p. 5). Her vision of the Love which God is was that of Fatherhood, and even more remarkable, of Mother hood. " As verily as God is our Father, so verily God is our Mother ; and that showed He in all, and especially in these sweet words where He saith : 61 Studies in Christian Mysticism I it am. That is to say, I it am, the Might and the Goodness of the Fatherhood ; I it am, the Wisdom of the Motherhood ; I it am, the Light and the Grace that is all blessed Love ; I it am, the Trinity ; I it am, the Unity : I am the sovereign Goodness of all manner of things. I am that maketh thee to love : I am that maketh thee to long : I it am, the endless fulfilling of ah true desires " (p. 147). One other passage must be given, the closing one of her book : " And I saw full surely that ere God made us He loved us ; which love was never slacked, nor ever shall be. And in this love He hath done all His works ; and in this love He hath made all things profitable to us ; and in this love our life is everlasting. In our making we had beginning ; but the love wherein He made us was in Him from without beginning : in which love we have our beginning. And all this shall we see in God, without end " (p. 203). What the vision meant to the Lady Julian is seen, I think, in this hope, in the expression of which she anticipates the faith which holds the heart of many in our day, and which is grounded in the vision of the Holy Love of God : " Thus I understood that all His blessed children which be come out of Him by Nature shall be brought again into Him by Grace " (p. 159). (2) Of the Soul. — If the vision of God brings with it true self-knowledge, " beholding His greatness we 62 Mystical Theology are struck by our own baseness, His purity shows our foulness, and by meditating on His humility we find how very far we are from being humble " (The Interior Castle, p. 18), yet this self-abasement is but one result. True self-exaltation also follows, for the worth and dignity of the soul are revealed. The soul that is of worth to God must also be of worth to itself, and the measure of God's regard declares that worth. The discovery of God's Presence in the Soul is the mystic secret. " Why do I pray that Thou shouldest enter into me, seeing that I also am ? For I should not be, if Thou wert not in me " — so St. Augustine writes. It is the re-discovery of the Apostolic faith : "Ye are a sanctuary of God ; and the Spirit of God dwelleth in you." The doctrine of the Immanence of God is taught by all Mystics. In Philosophic Mysticism this essential truth passes almost if not wholly into Pantheism, but in Religious Mysticism it is a truth of experience. Eckhart, in whom the speculative and deeply religious elements were remarkably combined, in his sermon on " The Nearness of the Kingdom," says : " I am as sure as I live that nothing is so near to me as God. God is nearer to me than I am to myself ; my existence depends on the nearness and presence of God," and to know this nearness of God is our happiness. In another sermon he; 63 Studies in Christian Mysticism declares : " There is a somewhat in the soul that is, as it were, a blood relative of God." Tauler speaks of " the unseen depths of the spirit where lies the image of God," and declares : " He is much nearer than anything is to itself in the depths of the heart." Rusybroeck taught that " the soul finds God in its own depths." St. John of the Cross wrote : " In every soul, even that of the greatest sinner in the world, God dwells, and is substantially present." It is unnecessary to press the matter further. Freed from philosophic terms and scholastic specula tion, the truth of Mysticism is the simple yet profound truth of Scripture. Man is the Image, the Offspring, the Son of God, and to restore and perfect the lost image, and to draw back the wandering sons to the Father is the place and power of Christ. "Thou hast made us for Thyself, and our hearts are restless until they find rest in Thee." " The direct access of the soul to God — the direct access of God to the soul," this, which has been declared to be " the ultimate principle of Protes tantism," is the first-hand experience of the Religious Mystics. To them this was no mere " principle " — it was the life of their life. For them, conversion was in truth " the solitary disclosure of God to the Soul." Enough has not been made of this experience, 64 Mystical Theology which is by no means limited to the past. It is a vital experience to-day, though far less notably so than all devout souls wish. I press the point : Conversion is essentially mystical, and true Mysti cism is found in every genuine conversion. The author of Mysticism, as it appears to me, has a very inadequate idea of what the Evangelical Churches, at least, mean by conversion. She defines " religious conversion as ordinarily under stood " thus : " the sudden and emotional accept ance of theological beliefs which the self had previously either rejected or treated as conventions dwelling upon the margin of consciousness and having no meaning for her actual life " (p. 213). As known to many of us, conversion is not necessarily sudden, and it is always moral. It is often an epitome of the " Mystic Way." There is a gradual detachment from old ways, a greater thoughtfulness, with times of serious self-questioning. The thought of God and of His Will becomes persistent. Memories of Christ are revived. Often there is severe inward conflict, the sense of past wrong-doing, and the secret longing for deliverance. At last light breaks, God speaks, and the will is yielded to His obedience, and in that experience God is known, His Presence is a reality, and life is changed. This experience is repeated upon higher planes 65 E Studies in Christian Mysticism of life and thought. Now the turning away is from the pride of intellect, or from self-satisfaction in spiritual things. The Vision of Christ is fuller, deeper. The contemplation of God is more profound. God and the soul, the soul and God, ever in closer fellowship, in living, personal union, knowing and known — this is the mystic consciousness. 66 CHAPTER VI THE SEAT OF AUTHORITY The great truths of Mysticism are, as we have seen, two, of God, and of the soul. Other truths are discussed by the Mystics, and many startling theories are propounded — doctrines of Sin, of the Soul's essential nature and destiny, of the nature of God Himself, and of the Universe. But these do not arise necessarily out of, or belong essentially to, the religious experience. They belong to the speculative element in Mysticism. The Divine in Man, and the Human in God, the true kinship of man and God, the discovery of and communion with God in the secret life within — this it is which is given in religious experience. Out of this experience arises the doctrine of the " Inner Light," its reality and its authority. Here we touch the danger zone of Mysticism. To many it has seemed that Mysticism is but another name for " Subjectivism." In the very measure of the brightness of the " Inner Light " must be the impulse to reject all external aids to, and authority in, matters of faith. The strong emphasis which is laid upon humility is not without its special need. 67 E 2 Studies in Christian Mysticism The testimony of experience is that God dwells " with him that is of a contrite and humble spirit." This danger has been strongly emphasised by Herrmann in his deeply religious book : The Communion of the Christian with God. To him the piety of Mysticism is : " When the influence of God upon the soul is sought and found solely in an inward experience of the individual ; when certain excitements of the emotions are taken, with no further question, as evidence that the soul is possessed by God ; when, at the same time, nothing external to the soul is consciously and clearly perceived and firmly grasped." I have emphasised the qualifying words upon which the whole of his assumption rests. He grants all for which we contend when he says : " The Mystic seeks God in his own inner life. In this he ' is indeed not altogether wrong. For we never find God until He rules in our inner life." But Herr mann will not admit that this is Mysticism in and of itself ; to complete the idea there must be the minimising, even to rejection, of all external authority. Hence he can say : " Mysticism is not that which is common to all religion, but a particular species of religion, namely, a piety which feels that which is historical in the positive religion to be burdensome and so rejects it." In his earnest desire to exalt the historical Person of Jesus, 68 The Seat of Authority he seems to go to the opposite extreme and to deny to experimental religion its true place and power. What are the facts ? Do the Christian Mystics limit all Divine Revelation to the " Inner Light," rejecting all historical religion, and refusing guidance from external sources ? Were this the case then it would be no wonder that devout men should leave the Mystics severely alone. Wesley's well-known objection to the mystical writers is based largely upon this misunderstanding. " I think," he wrote in 1736, " the rock on which I had the nearest made shipwreck of the faith was the writings of the Mystics — under which term I comprehend all, and only those, who slight any of the means of grace " (Life and Times of Wesley, Vol. I . , p. 133) . His own mystic experience, " second conversion " it is often named, two years later, when for the first time he experi enced religion in its fulness of conviction and of joy, ought to have changed his attitude ; but so late as 1764 he returned to the attack. After reading a Defence of the Mystic Writers he formulated his objections : to their sentiments — their spirit — and their whole phraseology. We can only con clude that Wesley's acquaintance with the Mystics was very limited. It is evident that Jacob Boehme is most in his mind, for he concludes : "St. John speaks as high and as deep things as Jacob Behmen. 69 Studies in Christian Mysticism Why then does not Jacob speak as plain as he ? " (Vol. II., p. 521.) For the understanding of the subject before us, two considerations must be held in mind. First, that there is no pure, unmixed experience, unin fluenced by anything outside itself, just as there is no self-realisation except under the influence of other selves. Second— that all vital knowledge of God must be direct Self-revelation, not otherwise can it carry conviction as of God. In the final issue the seat of Authority, for each soul for itself, must be within. No outer revelation can be received unless it is authenticated within, and, unless received within, it must remain inoperative. " All the great works and wonders that God has ever wrought or shall ever work in or through the creatures, or even God Himself with all His good ness, so far as these things exist or are done outside of me, can never make me blessed, but only in so far as they exist and are done and loved, known, tasted and felt within me " (Theologia Germanica, p. 28). It is a simple truism to say that we receive only < what we can receive. Every nature is the measure of its own receptivity. This is not to make the individual the measure of the truth, but he is his ¦ own measure as to what of truth he can receive. There must be "an inner witness " if any external voice is to carry conviction. The Word of God Him- 70 The Seat of Authority self, whether as contained in the Bible, or as spoken by living voices, must speak to this " inner witness " if it is to be verily God's Word. This truth the Prophets knew. They spoke with conviction, out of their own souls, hoping to evoke, not override, the moral sense of their hearers. " Come now let us reason together " — is the Divine note. So our Lord Himself appealed to those whom He addressed. " How think ye — What think ye — Why of your selves judge ye not what is right." The true relation of the outward and inward voices has been clearly stated by Coleridge : " As much of reality, as much of objective truth, as the Scriptures communicate to the subjective experiences of the Believer, so much of present life, of living and effective import do these experiences give to the letter of the Scriptures. In the one, the Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we have received the spirit of adoption ; in the other our spirit bears witness to the power of the Word, that it is indeed the Spirit that proceedeth from' God" (Confessions — Letter VII.). We return to our question — What are the facts ? Do the Mystics as such " slight the means of grace " ? (i) They were devout and loyal sons and daughters of their Church, fulfilling all her rites, and sub jecting themselves in all outward duties to her discipline. This is the surprising fact. We expect to find a breaking away from formal religion coire- 7i Studies in Christian Mysticism sponding to the inward realisation of vital, personal religion. It was not so. No doubt there are exceptions. There are extravagances of Mysticism, and something worse. But, speaking generally, the great Mystics of the Middle Ages did not depre ciate external obligations or disregard the doctrines of their Church. Holding the essential Protestant faith of direct personal fellowship with God, they were in no sense " Protestants." There is no need to adduce evidence. Indeed the fact that mystical writings are so permeated with Roman Catholic ideas and rites has proved a stumbling-block in the way of their appreciation by the devout of other Churches. The enlargement of ideas and widening of sympathies which is in process, and which, in part at least, accounts for the new awakening of interest in Mysticism, will minimise this objection. But this must be said — these outward forms of religion are not essential elements in Mysticism. The proof of this is seen in The Society of Friends : " A religious body which has made a serious attempt to unite inward, mystical religion with active, social endeavours, and to maintain a religious fellowship without a rigid ecclesiastical system, and with large scope for personal initiative, immediate revelation and individual responsibility " (Studies in Mystical Religion, p. xxxviii.). 72 The Seat of Authority (2) Mystics recognise the need for the correction of individual experience by external authority. No man may be a law to himself, in thought or in action. No life is alone. Comparison is necessary, and truth gains added force as it is seen working in other lives. In the Life of St. Teresa it is told again and again how eagerly she sought guidance, and submitted her experience to the judgment of others. And for " her children " she insists that while " experience is necessary throughout, so also is a spiritual Director." For herself she welcomed most those who were " timid about these things," and to them she " laid bare her secrets with the greater joy." " I hold all truth in suspicion which the authority of the Scriptures does not confirm," writes Richard of St. Victor. Telling of the three means that bring a soul to contemplation, Walter Hilton includes " reading of Holy Scripture and good books." One of the joys of the contemplative life, he says, is " to see Jesus in the Scriptures after the opening of the spiritual eye." It is, I think, in the writings of St. John of the Cross, who might be cited as one of the most exclu sive and self-centred of the Mystics, that the need of f ellowship with others in the faith is most strikingly taught. Quoting a well-known passage, he writes, paraphrasing the thought : " Where two or three meet together, to consider what is for the greater glory and honour of My 73 Studies in Christian Mysticism name, there am I in the midst of them, enlightening them, and confirming the truths of God in their hearts. Remember, He does not say : Where one is, but where two are, at the least. He would have us know that it is not His will that anyone should, trusting to himself, rely on the divine communica tions ; and that He will not establish us therein without the authority and direction of the Church or His Ministers. God will not enlighten him who is alone, nor confirm the truth in his heart : such an one will be weak and cold " (The Ascent of Mount Carmel, p. 189). (3) The place of Jesus Christ in mystical experi ence. In view of the criticism of Herrmann, and of his express statement that the Mystic in finding God " has left Christ behind," the question of the relation of Christ to mystical experience is supremely important. In Christ we have the Highest Authority, and for any religious experience which is to be called Christian His place must be pre eminent. Here, again, we turn to the words of the Mystics themselves. St. John of the Cross writes : " We must abide in the teaching of Christ, all beside is nothing, and not to be believed, unless it be in harmony therewith " (The Ascent of Mount Carmel, p. 186). " God hath now so spoken, that nothing remains unspoken ; for that which He partially revealed to the prophets He hath now revealed wholly in Him, giving unto us all, that is, His Son " (p. 184). " If thou desirest to learn of God secret things, fix thine eyes upon Christ, and 74 The Seat of Authority thou wilt find the profoundest mysteries, the wisdom and marvels of God, hidden in Him " (p. 185). Even Eckhart, " who more than any other of the German Mystics gives himself to abstract specula tion," has this direction : "If the Divine Nature be beyond your comprehension, believe simply on Christ ; follow His holy example, and remain steadfast." And for himself, he says : " If I should remain entombed in flesh till the judgment day and suffer the pains of hell, that would be for me a small thing to bear for my beloved Lord Jesus Christ, if I had the certainty at last of not being separated from Him. While I am here, He is in me ; after this hfe, I am in Him. All things are therefore possible to me, if I am united to Him who can do all things " (Sermons, p. 37). The testimony given under these three heads might be added to almost indefinitely, but what has been given will, I think, suffice to justify the asser tion that Christian Mysticism does not include the rejection or the depreciation of external religion. The mystic experience is of a deep and vital spiritual life, the discovery of God within, and the communion of the Soul with God, a knowledge of God and com munion with God as revealed in and through Jesus Christ, so that the Gospel Story is bound up in separably with the religious experience. Nor must we omit from thought the natural fellowship of kindred minds which instinctively 75 Studies in Christian Mysticism draws into close sympathy those who share the same experience. There is abundant evidence that the Mystics, generally, read and carefully studied the writings of those who had lived the life before them, and even in the few cases where there is little evidence of this, yet the very fact that these secluded Mystics should have recorded their experience shows that they were not mere isolated units — they wrote for the guidance of those who they knew desired their help. In this fellowship one with another we seem to be witnessing the re-birth of the great Christian faith of " The Communion of Saints." Indeed, whatever their own Church life, the devout Mystics reveal, and sometimes even consciously realise, that in this fellowship of spiritual life is the true Unity of the Body of Christ. And this is our hope for our own day. More and more is it seen that outward uniformity and intellectual agreement cannot be looked for. It is for " the Unity of the Spirit " we pray. And this unity already exists among all those who have discovered God in their souls and are dealing directly with Him. 76 CHAPTER VII MYSTICAL INTERPRETATION The distinction between Mysticism considered as a vital rehgious experience and Mysticism as a principle of interpretation is of the greatest import ance. There is a certain fascination in a thorough going doctrine of Symbolism, and most of all when, to the seeing eye, " all things are full of God." The Nature Symbolism of our great Poets is beautiful and helpful. The tender reverence for Nature of St. Francis of Assisi, who could speak of " my little sisters the birds," is delightful. The Lady Julian wrote : " After this I saw God in a Point, that is to say in mine understanding — by which sight I saw that He is in all things." Even the author of Theologia Germanica can say : " The creatures are a guide and a path unto God and Eternity. This world is an outer court of Eternity." There is, however, one essential condition of this vision of God in all things : the spiritual eye must be opened, God must be known first of all within, in the soul itself, not otherwise will He be found in Nature. This is ever the witness of Rehgious Mysticism. This principle is of special force in the interpreta- 77 Studies in Christian Mysticism tion of Scripture. To the soul that knows God and waits upon His Word, symbols of His thought are found everywhere ; all Holy Scripture is full of God. But it is quite possible to hold a doctrine of interpre tation, and to be able to elaborate and apply its rules, without any first-hand knowledge of God Himself. There is a danger of Mysticism degenerat ing into mere Symbolism, and delight in mystic meanings taking the place of religious experience. Indeed not a little of the " spiritual interpretation of Scripture " has been prompted by the exigencies of Apologetics, rather than by the insight of experience. This is true, in great measure, of Origen, the prince of Allegorists. His was the serious task of meeting opponents, and refuting their objections to the Hebrew Scriptures as of Divine origin and i authority. He laid down the doctrine that " as man consists of body and soul and spirit, so in the same way does Scripture," which has a literal, a moral, and a mystical significance. In his Homilies on Exodus he declares that " not one iota or one tittle is without mysteries." All is precious— every minute detail, incident, turn of expression, name, number. " For those who can understand " there is a spiritual sense in everything. Some passages, he held, " do not at all contain the corporeal sense." In illustration, he instances the vessels of water for 78 Mystical Interpretation purification, containing two or three firkins apiece— "darkly intimating that the Jews are purified by the word of Scripture, receiving sometimes two firkins, i.e., so to speak, the ' psychical ' and ' spiritual ' sense ; and sometimes three firkins, since some have in addition to those already men tioned also the ' corporeal ' sense, which is capable of edification." Origen finds the justification of his method in the writings of St. Paul, and no doubt the Apostle's Rabbinical training does colour his thought at times, though in his Epistles allegory holds a very sub ordinate place. It is but " the turn of a metaphor, or the character of an illustration, or the form of an argument," and can hardly be used in support of a thorough-going system of allegorical interpretation. " The object of the Spirit," so Origen believed, was the enumeration " of ineffable mysteries," in order that " he who is capable of instruction may by investigation, and by devoting himself to the study of the profundities of meaning contained in the words, become a participator of all the doctrines of His Counsel." This introduces into Divine Revela tion the definite purpose of concealment, and exalts the " esoteric " into a Divine grace. The very basis of allegorism is in the assumed Divine intention to " conceal from the multitude the deeper meaning " of Scripture, 79 Studies in Christian Mysticism Through Origen, the principle of mystical inter pretation became established in Christian thought, and, as we should expect, it entered very largely into the writings of the Mystics. The surprise, I think, is that it did not enter more largely. Allow ance, however, has to be made for unfamiliarity with the Bible. Before the age of printing, copies of the Scriptures must have been comparatively rare, and before the age of translations into the vernacular, the Bible was a sealed book to many. St. Teresa tells us that she " scarcely understood a word of Latin." In her writings there are very few Scripture references. Their charm lies in her directness of speech, " illustrated by so nice and homely examples." Her parable oi the watered garden is rich in suggestiveness. It is given in her Life, written by herself. " A beginner must look upon himself as making a garden, wherein our Lord may take His delight, but in a soil unfruitful, and abounding in weeds." The Lord roots up the weeds, and plants good herbs. " We have, as good gardeners, by the help of God, to see that the plants grow, to water them carefully that they may not die, but produce blossoms which shall send forth much fragrance. ... It seems to me that the garden may be watered in four ways : by water taken out of a well, which is very laborious ; or with water raised by means of an engine and buckets, drawn by a windlass — I have drawn it this way sometimes — it is a less troublesome way than 80 Mystical Interpretation the first, and gives more water ; or by a stream or brook, whereby the garden is watered in a much better way ... or by showers of rain when our Lord Himself waters it." [She then proceeds to give " the application of these four ways of irrigation by which the garden is to be maintained "] (p. 81). This use of natural imagery runs through her books, but of allegorising there is little or nothing. Of course — for this contrast belongs to the subject — there is the usual reference to Martha and Mary, as types of the Active and Contemplative lives. Here again her woman's wit serves her well. She writes : " St. Martha was holy, though we are never told she was a contemplative ; would you not be content with resembling this blessed woman, who deserved to receive Christ our Lord so often into her home ? . . . Remember that some one must cook the food, and think yourself favoured in being allowed to serve with Martha " (The Way of Perfection, p. no). In another place, indeed in more than one, she speaks of the contemplative and active life com bined — " thus Martha and Mary toil together." In St. John of the Cross we meet another type of mind. He is the scholar, the student, and to him the Bible was a well-known book. In the Index of Scripture texts in The Ascent of Mount Carmel there are over 200 Old Testament passages given, and 150 New Testament. In that of the Spiritual Canticle, there are about 200 references — excluding the passages from The Song of Solomon, upon which the 81 F Studies in Christian Mysticism book is based. Reference has already been made to this book. It seems as if it were only in the ecstatic emotions of this love-song that the Mystics could find adequate symbols of their own spiritual love. For the most part the applications of Scripture in the writings of St. John of the Cross, are direct and apt. There are occasional " mystical interpreta tions." " ' He sendeth His crystals ' — that is con templation — ' like morsels ' — these morsels of dim contemplation." " ' At the brightness that was before Him the clouds passed ' — that is, between Him and our understanding." " These are they — the soul's lower operations, passions, and desires — of whom our Saviour said in the holy Gospel, ' A man's enemies shall be they of his own household.' " The ladder of Jacob's dream shadows forth " the ladder of contemplation." This symbol is frequently used in mystical writings. In his use of it, the ladder has ten steps. The creeping things and abomina tions which Ezekiel saw, in his vision, painted on the walls of the Temple are " the thoughts and concep tions of the intellect derived from the vile things of earth, which defile the Temple of the Soul." Often his spiritualisings are apt and suggestive. " Why do you spend money, of self-will, for that which is not bread, that is, the Spirit of God." Of the longing of the soul for God, he writes : 82 Mystical Interpretation " So oppressive is this thirst of the soul, that it counts it as nothing to break through the camp of the Philistines, like the valiant men of David, to fill its pitcher with ' water out of the cisterns of Bethlehem ' which is Christ." " ' Let your loins be girt ' — the loins are the desires." Christ is the " Treasure hidden in the Soul." The command to enter the inner chamber and shut the door is a command to " enter within thyself " and shut the door " of the soul," or as Richard Rolle has it — " call thine heart home, and hold thy wits in there, that none go out." There is one great Mystical Book which runs an allegorisation of a Bible story through all its parts : I refer to the treatise Benjamin Minor, by Richard of St. Victor. Following the reading of the Vul gate : " This is Benjamin, a youth, in ecstasy of mind," this son of Jacob is taken as the type of contemplation. The whole scale of perfection is worked out under the characters of Jacob, his wives, and his children. " By Jacob is understanden God, by Rachel reason, by Leah affection," and so on through the whole family story. What, then, is to be our attitude to the mystical interpretation of Scripture ? (i) It must be admitted that the Bible is essen tially a mystical book. As a book of religion, telling the story of how men found God, and how God found and inspired men, it could not well be other. 83 F2 Studies in Christian Mysticism It must also be granted that there are special and remarkable mystical experiences told of many of the great leaders of rehgion. The whole story of Moses is full of these. Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and most of the Prophets had their " vision." And in the Christian Scriptures there are incidents and experiences of a like character. The conversion of St. Paul, and his trance visions, and St. Peter's experience at Joppa, may be cited in evidence. Then, too, there are many passages in these writings of the finest spiritual Mysticism ; not in the Fourth Gospel alone, but also in the other three, and not by any means in the writings of St. John alone, but also and, I think, in richer significance, in those of St. Paul. But all this may be freely and gladly admitted without going to the extreme of asserting, as some do, that the Bible is mystical throughout, and that deep spiritual meanings are to be found in any and every part. To count the whole of the New Testa ment as mystical in intention is to rob the supreme mystical passages therein of their special force and value. By reducing all to a common level, the rare wine of the richest Mysticism is sadly diluted. Indeed this is to set aside all ideas of historical interpretation, and to bring us back again to the old error of the " equal and level " theory of the Bible, and an altogether impossible doctrine of 84 Mystical Interpretation Inspiration and of Revelation. It is a return to the standpoint of Origen, without his excuse, compelling us to say, with the late Dean Burgon : " The Bible is none other than the voice of Him that sitteth upon the Throne. Every book of it, every chapter of it, every verse of it, every word of it, every syllable of it (where are we to stop ?), every letter of it, is the direct utterance of the Most High " (Inspiration and Interpretation, p. 89). To affirm that all in the Bible is thus the very Word of God, and charged with Divine significance, is to affirm that there is no Word of God which we need to consider, and no Divine message of any practical use to us. A chain is ever the strength of its weakest link. (2) But further than this, and if possible worse, the doctrine of the mystical interpretation of all sacred writings reduces to one level all religious writings, all Scriptures. The " enlightened " can discover the profoundest truths in all. To them the Bhagavad-GUd, especially as it is rendered in " The Song Celestial," is as the Fourth Gospel. The whole of mystical theology is found therein. Esoteric Buddhism becomes as rich and fruitful as Christianity itself. Of course, the form of these writings is different, and a certain superiority of the Christian Scriptures will be admitted, but to the " initiated " their essential value is the same. Now all this is 85 Studies in Christian Mysticism to shut the eyes to the witness of History. As a simple matter of fact, the Scriptures of the World have not wrought the same righteousness of life either in nations, or in individual lives. God has not been known in the same fulness, nor has com munion with Him been experienced in the same peace and gladness of heart, by the devout of all religions. The ultimate test remains : "by their fruits ye shall know them." (3) This principle of interpretation tends, in great measure, to the denial of the historical in Rehgion. This was felt by Origen, and he guards himself against the possible charge. " But that no one may suppose that we assert respecting the whole that no history is real because a certain one is not ; and that no law is to be literally observed, because a certain one according to the letter is absurd or impossible ; or that the state ments regarding the Saviour are not true in a manner perceptible to the senses ; or that no commandment and precept of His ought to be obeyed ; we have to answer that, with regard to certain things, it is perfectly clear to us that the historical account is true." ..." The passages that are true in their historical meaning are much more numerous than those which are interspersed with a purely spiritual signification " (De Principiis, Bk. IV., Ch. I). The tendency to ignore or deny the historical, under the assumption of enlightened Mysticism, is not wholly unknown in our own day. We find 86 Mystical Interpretation evidence of it in the interpretation of the Fourth Gospel. The writer of this Gospel confessedly uses his material for definite spiritual instruction. The miracles of Jesus are thought of as " Signs." Yes, it is said, they are Parables in the form of stories of action,, and have spiritual meanings only. I am not now discussing the question of the fact of the Miracles, neither do I doubt the mystic significance of many miracles. What I urge is that the pre sumed incompatibility between Mystical and His torical is false and misleading ; even if it were admitted that the Fourth Gospel is mystical through out, yet the question of the historical truth of the facts and incidents used by the writer is not settled. It is still open to say that the writer, in fulfilment of his purpose and for the enforcement and embodiment of his ideas, makes use of historical facts and not of mere imaginative pictures. The facts of Nature are not denied in Nature Mysticism. It is a sense of the meaning, thought, idea behind the outward that is felt. Assuming that the Divine Life is lived under human conditions, such a life must surely, in all its activities, be rich in the expression of mystical experience, richer far than any imaginatively created mystical stories. (4) The principle of mystical interpretation carries the fatal doctrine of the esoteric in religion. The Scriptures, on this theory, were written by 87 ' Studies in Christian Mysticism " initiates " for the initiated. In one sense this must be true ; " the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God : for they are foolishness unto him ; neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned." But there is a radical difference between these initiations. The Apostle's doctrine is that of all religious experience : " The meek will He guide in judgment, and the meek will He teach His way." The doctrine of Symbol Mysticism is : " By wisdom is God known." Such Mysticism is " for the educated and developed." " For the uninstructed and undeveloped the Church must continue to speak with veiled face, in parable and symbol." This is the " note " of the occult, rather than of Mysticism. In Christianity it is a discordant note. The doctrine that the Bible is first of all and mainly a religious Book is entirely right and good. It is for this very reason that it appeals to simple souls who know and experience vital religion. And this is the true attitude of the Mystics, and their united witness. The richest mystical experience may be, often has been, enjoyed by the lowly and uncultured. " Born of the Spirit," spiritual things are their highest good. Untrained in mental exercises they are yet " rich in faith." To them has been given to know the secret wisdom of God. In their experience has been fulfilled the saying of the Greatest 88 Mystical Interpretation Mystic : "I thank thee, 0 Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because Thou hast hid these things from the wise and prudent, and hast revealed them unto babes." " Blessed are the poor in spirit for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven." 89 CHAPTER VIII PRACTICAL MYSTICISM A Mystic, in the thought of many, is an imprac tical dreamer rejoicing, it may be, in the indulgence of his own emotions, but of no service to anybody else. Let it be at once admitted that this judgment is not wholly baseless. In mystical writings the affec tions and activities of ordinary life are so utterly contemned, and the call to complete detachment from all external realities is so absolute, that readers are not altogether without excuse for their mis understanding. To some minds even the Imitation is positively distasteful. Ardent lovers of the book have to admit that, on its negative side, it is " false in emphasis and, more than that, false to the facts of experience and realit)'. This picture of the worthlessness of the finite, the vanity of all that is, is untrue and impossible. Taken consistently, it cuts the nerve of spiritual effort, and destroys all faith in the significance of earthly life with its myriad moral issues. It turns the gaze away from the very stuff out of which moral and spiritual fibre is to be woven." "The eternal thing in the book is its calm and compelling revelation of the reality of the 90 Practical Mysticism spiritual Kingdom, and its complete sufficiency for the soul " (Mystical Religion, pp. 326 — 7). Milman's criticism that it "begins in self and terminates in self," has been refuted at some length by Mr. Montmorency in his Thomas d, Kempis, his Age and Book. We agree that in one sentence, which by no means stands alone, this criticism is refuted. " If thou wilt be carried : carry also another " — to which we may add this saying : "If thy heart were right then every creature would be a mirror of life, and a book of holy doctrine to thee." The prayer of Jesus for His disciples : "I pray not that Thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that Thou shouldest keep them from the evil," gives the true life-principle— 4n the world but not of the world. This way of life some at least of the Mystics clearly perceived, as I shall hope to illustrate from their writings and from their hves. In the teaching of the Mystics, three directions of thought may be profitably considered. Their thoughts of Nature, of love and service of one another, and of service in relation especially to ecstasy. (1) Nature.— -In any fuU study of Mysticism account must be taken of the symbolism of Nature. Indeed Mysticism itself has been defined in terms of symbolism, " that everything, in being what it is, is symbolic of something more." It is not of this I wish to speak, but of the first-hand experience of 9i Studies in Christian Mysticism God. Is there a message of God in Nature ? Are the Mystics, as such, blind — self-blinded it could only be — to the glories of earth and sea and sky ? The answer may be given in the words of Suso : " O tender God ! if Thou art so loving in Thy creations, how beautiful and delightful must Thou be Thyself." Nature parables and images abound in the writings of St. Teresa, showing how richly she had fulfilled the command to " consider the lilies, and behold the birds." The love of St. Francis for all living creatures as sharers with himself of the Divine life is one of the many attractive qualities in a life full of love and tenderness. (2) Love and Service of one another. — The second great commandment, even as the first, and as necessitated by it, is ever emphasised. Love to our neighbour is part of our love of God. " What a man takes in by Contemplation he must pour out in love " — so Eckhart taught. He even exalts Martha, " who has learnt her lesson," above Mary," who is still at school." Tauler's sermons are charged with ascetisicm. Even the affections of ordinary life are set aside. They were sermons to the religious, and due allow ance must be made accordingly. But there is another note therein. Thus, when distinguishing between true and false conversion, he says the truly converted are " kind-hearted to their neighbour " 92 Practical Mysticism and ever ready to " lend him a helping hand." They are " careful to fill up their time industriously with good and useful undertakings to the glory of God and the good of their neighbours." All aptness for any art of life he counts a gift of God. " If I were not a priest," he says, " but were living as a layman, I should take it as a great favour that I knew how to make shoes, and should try to make them better than anyone else, and would gladly earn my bread by the labour of my hands." He urges that this is the spirit in which all work should be done, " in God with a view to His glory, and the good of his neighbour." " I will not that thou shouldest ween that all are holy that have the habit of holiness, and are not occupied with the world. Nor that all are ill who discourse of earthly business; " thus Richard Rolle, who also says : " He is ever praying, who is doing good." In the writings of St. Teresa the second command ment of love is very strongly enforced, and with a special emphasis which sounds quite modern : " Our Lord asks but two things of us : love for Him and for our neighbour ; this is what we must strive to obtain. Let us try to do His will perfectly ; then we shall be united to Him. ... I think the most certain sign that we keep these two command ments is that we have a genuine love for others. We cannot know whether we love God, although 93 Studies in Christian Mysticism there may be strong reasons for thinking so, but there can be no doubt about whether we love our neighbour or no " (The Interior Castle, p. 117). (3) Service and Ecstasy— As, the inward joy of the life with God is so dwelt upon by the Mystics, we might expect them to teach that nothing should ever be allowed to interrupt this holy fellowship. The hours of devotion, these surely, they will tell us, must be kept sacred for God and the soul alone. Let us hear their own answer : " Even if a man were in rapture such as Paul experienced, and if he knew of a person who needed something of him, I think it would be far better out of love to leave the rapture and serve the needy man." This is Eckhart's teaching, and it is followed by others. Thus Ruysbroeck writes : " Interior consolation is of an inferior order to the act of love which renders service to the poor. Were you rapt in ecstasy like St. Peter or St. Paul, or whomsoever you will, and heard that some poor person was in want of a hot drink, or other assistance, I should advise you to awake for a moment from your ecstasy to go to prepare the food. Leave God for God ; find Him, serve Him in His members ; you will lose nothing by the exchange " (Reflections from the Mirror of a Mystic, p. 54). The solitary life, he teaches, is not in outward condition, but in spirit, for " none can prevent him who seeks and tastes God in all things, from being 94 Practical Mysticism a solitary amid all multitudes and multiplicities whatsoever." " He lives in the market place as if it were a church or a cell." " The same spirit should accompany a spiritual man everywhere." This also was Eckhart's teaching before him. For them the division of hfe between the sacred and the secular was altogether unspiritual. Here, again, the words of St. Teresa are very direct : " When I see people very anxious to know what sort of prayer they practise, covering their faces and afraid to move or think, lest they should lose what tenderness and devotion they feel, I know how little they understand how to attain union with God, since they think it consists in such things as this. No, my sisters, no ; our Lord expects works from us ! If you see a sick sister whom you can relieve, never fear losing your devotion ; compassionate her ; if she is in pain, pity her, and when there is need, fast so that she may eat, not so much for her sake, as because you know your Lord asks it of you. This is the true union of our will with that of God. . . . Beg of our Lord to grant you perfect love for your neighbour and leave the rest to Him. . . . Forget your self-interests for theirs, however much nature may rebel ; when there is an opportunity, take some burden upon yourself to ease your neighbour of it " (The Interior Castle, p. 119). That there are serious omissions in the teaching of the Mystics is indeed true. To them the very idea of the Kingdom of God as a social regeneration was an impossible conception, so intent were they upon 95 Studies in Christian Mysticism proclaiming the Kingdom of God within. The tendency of rehgious thought in our own time is in the opposite direction ; so intent are we upon the regeneration of social life that we are in danger of undervaluing its essential condition, the regeneration . of the soul itself. One fact should be remembered, a fact full of significance for our Christian teachers to-day. All their compassion was inspired by the thought and spiritual realisation of the sufferings of Christ. This is strikingly illustrated in Margery Kempe of Lynn, of whom it is said : " When she saw the Crucifix, or if she saw a man had a wound, or a beast, or if a man beat a child before her, or smote a horse or-another beast with a whip, if she might see it or hear it, she thought she saw our Lord beaten or wounded, like as she saw in the man or in the beast " (The Cell of Self -Knowledge, P- 54)- " And then I saw that each kind compassion that man hath on his even-Christians with charity, it is Christ in him. . . . He suffereth with us." So wrote Julian, Anchoress at Norwich. The teaching of the Mystics is, in a very true sense, practical, and in life they fulfilled their own words. They were deeply in earnest, seeking the true well- being of all. Why else did they write their books ? It was the desire to help others into and along the Way that moved them to tell the story of their own religious experience. 96 Practical Mysticism Even in their " calling," all were not priests, or monks. Many were simple laymen, engaged in common toil. Such, for the most part, were " The Friends of God," who " formed small groups, or local societies, gathered about some spiritual leader or counsellor." Tauler, himself one of these leaders, says : " I know a man who has the closest walk with God of any I ever saw, and who has been all his life a husbandman — for more than forty years, and is so still." Baron von Hiigel writes of St. Catherine of Genoa as, " amongst formally canonised Saints, a rare example of a contemplative and Mystic who, from first to last, leads at the same time the common life of marriage and of widowhood in the world " (The Mystical Element of Religion, I., p. 248). The story of her activities is remarkable. " For eleven years she worked among the sick as but one of their many nurses." Throughout this period "she never was without the consciousness of her tender Love, nor again did she, because of this consciousness, fail in any practical matter concerning the Hospital." Later she was appointed Matron of the whole institu tion. " During the six years in which she held this office, she had much administrative business and responsibility weighing upon her. Large sums of money passed through her hands, and she always managed to spend and account for them with the 97 g Studies in Christian Mysticism greatest care and success" (I., p. 143). During the great Plague of 1493 she was untiring in her devotion. She organised tent wards, appointed doctors, nurses, priests and attendants. " Throughout the weeks and months of the visitation she was daily in their midst, superintending, ordering, stimulating, steady ing, consoling, strengthening this vast crowd of panic-stricken poor and severely strained workers " (I., p. 144). But the Mystics who may be said to have devoted themselves wholly to the Contemplative life were not inactive. The story of many of them is that of toilsome labour in the service of the Church, and of religion. Many of them were evangelists, in the literal sense of the term, and some also in the ordi nary meaning of that term. A notable example is found in Gerard Groote, styled by his contemporaries " the first father of our Reformation " and " founder of all our modern devotion." His first awakening was through the instrumentality of an unknown, unnamed " Friend of God," who whispered to him : " Why standest thou here ? — thou oughtest to become another man." Later, with his heart on fire, he went forth to preach the love of God, and such was the general awaken ing, that had he not been silenced by the Church authorities, Luther's great work might have been his. 98 Practical Mysticism As it was he founded the new order of " The Brethren of the Common Life." " The members took no permanent vows, they mingled freely in the world for purposes of service, and lived from their manual labour (copying and beautifying manuscripts) without any resort to begging. They wore a simple grey garb and followed a very simple manner of life — it was an effort to make daily life spiritual. Their emphasis was on practice rather than on contemplation. The most visible social service which came from the movement was the impetus it gave to practical education, in which direction Gerard was the prime mover. Through his brotherhoods he provided not only copies of the Scriptures and other holy books for the people, but what was still more important, he pro vided for the instruction of the common people, especially the children. His brothers gave free teaching in their communities to the poorer people, teaching them to read and write, and creating in their minds an appreciation of the real meaning of their religion " (Mystical Religion, p. 320). The influence of Gerard the Great was far-reaching. In his book, The Founders of the New Devotion, Thomas a Kempis speaks of himself as " first launched for the services of God, and in the fulness of time steered to the haven of the monastery " — by " Florentius, that Reverend Father of pious memory, Priest of the Church of Deventer, and once a disciple of that Master Gerard of whom I have told above." The fellowship was more than is thus indicated ; it was one of spiritual sympathy, as his Life of Gerard shows. Indeed Dr. Rufus Jones goes 99 G 2 Studies in Christian Mysticism so far as to say that Gerard is the " true spiritual father of the author of the Imitation." Reference has been made to education, and much might be added. In Germany it was the Mystics who founded schools. Because of his great work as a teacher of poor children, Gerson gained for himself the title of " Doctor of the people, and Doctor of little children." It was thus that the Mystics prepared the way in Germany and the Low Countries for the revival of letters, art and science. It is impossible, within our limits, to complete the tale. The story of four of the great Mystics is one of active devotion to the reform of religion. The great work which St. Catherine of Siena set herself was to restore the spiritual power to the Church. St. Ignatius was the founder of the Society of Jesus, a Missionary Society in its first great purpose. St. Teresa was the great reformer of her Order of Carmelites, infusing new life therein. In this work she had the help of her disciple, St. John of the Cross. It is needless to press the case further. The charge of mere dreamery will not bear investigation. In the measure of the vitality of religious experience, a life of service must flow therefrom. " Far from being the unpractical, dreamy persons they are too often conceived to have been, they have weathered storms, endured conflicts, and lived through water-spouts which would have over whelmed souls whose anchor did not reach beyond ioo Practical Mysticism the veil. They have discovered an inner refuge, where they enjoy the truce of God, even amid the din of the world's warfare. They have led great reforms, championed movements of great moment to humanity, and they have saved Christianity from being submerged under scholastic formalism and ecclesiastical systems, which were alien to man's essential need and nature " (Mystical Religion, p. xxx.). 101 CHAPTER IX A TYPICAL MYSTIC I have purposely refrained from giving lengthy quotations from the writings of Walter Hilton, so that I might be free to devote one chapter entirely to this great English Mystic and to illustrate more fully from his teaching some of the questions considered. But little is known of his active life, beyond the fact that he was a Canon of Thurgarton, in Notting hamshire. In his brief reference, entirely sympa thetic, Dr. Rufus Jones has this paragraph, which will serve well as our starting-point : " Walter Hilton is the best known of the popular writers of mystical literature in England in the fourteenth century. He was, as was Rolle, an Oxford scholar and a contemporary of Wyclif — the probable date of his death being 1395. He was a man of rare and saintly life, ' travailing busily with all the powers of his soul to fulfil the truth of good life.' A very strong case has been made out for settling upon him the authorship of the Imitation of Christ, and, though it is practically certain that he did not write it, it is high praise to say, what critics generally admit, that he might have written it " (Studies in Mystical Religion, p. 338). 102 A Typical Mystic The Scale of Perfection, of which there are five MSS. in the British Museum, was often printed. In recent times two editions have appeared, one of which was re-issued by the Art and Book Company, in 1908. In this edition the Treatise written to a Devout Man is included. There is also a short treatise Of the Song of Angels included in The Cell of Self-Knowledge (Chatto & Windus). The refer ences throughout are to The Scale of Perfection. The personal notes, though few, are suggestive. They are like little windows through which we catch glimpses of a rich landscape beyond. Once and again he states that his words, often most searching, have a double purpose, " both for thy profit and my own." He writes for the guidance of a " Contem plative," an Anchoress whom he addresses as " Ghostly Sister in Christ Jesus," though his words have often a wider reference. In fellowship with all saintly souls, he has a very lowly opinion of himself. Dwelling upon " the endless mercy of our Lord," it is of mercy " to thee and to me and to all sinful caitiffs." In another place he describes himself as " a wretched caitiff, living in sin." He never writes in a dictatorial spirit, but always by way of guidance and direction : " This is my opinion herein ; do thou better if thou canst." " Not that I would by these discourses limit God's working by the law of my speaking, as 103 Studies in Christian Mysticism to say God worketh thus in a soul and no otherwise. No, I mean not so, but I speak after my simple feeling that our Lord worketh thus in some creatures as I conceive. And I hope well, also, that He worketh otherwise, which passeth my wit and my feeling" (p. 235). Nor does he write in any self-righteous spirit, claiming himself to be and to do all that he teaches. Like St. Paul, he too knows that he has not yet attained, nor is yet made perfect. After writing of the Contemplative life, what it is, and of the ways thereto, he adds : " Not as if I had it myself in feeling and in working, as I have it in talking. Nevertheless, I would by this writing of mine (such as it is) first stir up my own negligence to do better than I have done ; and also my purpose is to stir thee, or any other man or woman that hath taken the state of life Contemplative, to travail more diligently and more humbly in that manner of life, by such simple words as God hath given me grace for to say " (pp. 131— 2). The guide and teacher in spiritual things must always lay himself open to the charge of urging upon others duties which he himself but imperfectly fulfils. His duty is to set forth the best he knows, the ideal life, and it is no shame to himself if that ideal life has not been realised in his own, provided always that he " follows the gleam." Imperfection is not always inconsistency. No true Christian ever claimed to be perfect. He is inconsistent 104 A Typical Mystic when he ceases to " follow after " — that he may attain. Here is Hilton's statement : " In answer to that which thou saidst, that I spake too high of prayer, I grant well that I spake more than I myself can or may do. Nevertheless, I spake it for this intent that thou shouldst know how we ought to pray ; and when we cannot do so, that we should acknowledge our weakness with all humility and God's mercy " (p. 43). If others attain where he fails, he will rejoice : " God knows I speak more than I do myself. But I pray thee do thus as I say, by the grace of God, if thou canst, or any other man that will, for it would be a comfort to my heart — though I have it not in myself that which I say — that I might have it in thee, or in any other creature, which hath received more plenty of His grace than I " (p. 105). Of the gracious beholding of Jesus, and the virtue and graces of the soul whose spiritual eye is opened to the vision of His glory, he writes : "I am afraid to speak anything of it, for me thinketh that I cannot, it passeth my attempt, and my lips are unclean " (p. 273). " A beautiful soul " — this term has rarely found more justification. There is a tenderness, a lowli ness of mind, and openness and teachableness of spirit, which win our trust and reverence. If Walter Hilton is in any sense a fair type of f ourteenth- 105 Studies in Christian Mysticism century piety, and we know he is not alone, then we shall have to revise some of our estimates of those times, and learn to think more worthily alike of our fellow-Christians, and of the enriching grace of God. Personal religion was a reality to him. This is his essential Mysticism, a vital experience of God, and of God in and through Jesus Christ. Voices and visions, and the abnormal generally, have no attrac tion for him. He knows the danger in these, and, as we have seen, knows how to bring all these to the test. For himself he declares : " Verily I had rather feel and have a true and clean desire in my heart to my Lord Jesus Christ, though I see little of Him with my spiritual eye, than to have without this desire all the bodily penance of all men living, all visions, all revelations of Angels appearing, all songs and sounding to the ear, all tastes and smellings, fervours or any delights, or bodily feelings, and (to be brief) all the joys of heaven and earth which are possible to be had, without this desire to my Lord Jesus " (p. 69). To his " dear brother in Christ," the devout lay man for whose instruction he is writing, he says : " Seek and nourish only this desire for God Himself, and seek not after any feeling in thy corporal senses, external or internal, nor any sensible sweetness or devotion, neither by the ear nor by the taste of thy palate, nor by any wonderful light or sight of thy eyes, nor seek the sight of Angels, no, though our Lord Himself would appear 106 A Typical Mystic in His body to the sight of thy eyes, make no great matter of that " (p. 338). Following the usual division, Hilton writes of " two manner of lives in which a Christian is to be saved " — Active and Contemplative. The Active life is for all, to be practised " according to their best knowledge and ability, and as reason and discretion shall require." The Contemplative life belongs especially to those who have withdrawn themselves from " outward businesses, and wholly given themselves soul and body to the service of God, by exercises of the soul." But these two fives are not incompatible — they can be, and ought to be, united by Christian men and women. " Thou shalt mingle the works of active hfe with the spiritual works of the contem plative life, and then thou dost well," is the advice to " a Devout Man." This mixed hfe " belongeth to Prelates of holy Church, and to pastors and curates." " And this mixed life did our Lord in Himself exercise, and show in the same manner, for an example to all other men that have taken on them the state or condition that requireth the exercise of the said mixed life " (p. 324). As Hilton holds Jesus Christ in supreme rever ence, we cannot doubt that he counts the " mixed hfe " as the highest. This life he himself followed, and though his Scale of Perfection was written for 107 Studies in Christian Mysticism a " Contemplative," and though he holds this life in great reverence, believing that therein a special fulness of spiritual joy is found, yet he knows also this separated life is for the few whom God calls thereto. " Let every man wherein he is called, therein abide with God " — such, it seems to me, is Hilton's teaching. " For thou must think, that since He hath put thee into that charge and estate of life, that it is the very best for thee, and that thou canst not do better than in performing what belongs thereto in the best manner and with all the willing ness and gladness of mind that thou art able " (P- 330). For the most part, Hilton's teaching is practical. Once and again he touches speculative questions, hinting, as it were, that he was familiar with these matters, and could, if so minded, deal with them, but his controlling purpose is to be definitely and practically useful. Thus of sin he says : " Verily it is nought, or no real thing." But at once he realises that his words wiU convey no clear meaning, and proceeds to speak of sin as " a false inordinate love of thyself," out of which flow the seven deadly sins, "pride, envy, anger, sloth, covetousness, glut tony and lechery," and of each of these he writes at length. In one passage he shows his knowledge of the speculative doctrine of " Union." " He who by ravishing of love is become united to God, God 108 A Typical Mystic and that soul are not now two, but both one. And surely in this Oneing consisteth the marriage which passeth betwixt God and the soul, that shall never be dissolved or broken " (p. 10). But this thought is not dwelt upon further. So also he is familiar with the mystical doctrine of interpretation of Scripture, which, when the spiritual eye is opened, and Jesus is Himself the ' teacher, " is expounded and declared literally, morally, mystically, and heavenly, if the matter will : bear it." His own use of Scripture, which is full, is always appropriate, with little trace of allegorising. The only instance of really poor and unsatisfactory symbolism is, when following St. Gregory, he writes of Rachel and Leah as types of " the two kinds of lives that are in the holy Church " (p. 331/.). He also speaks of the Sisters of Bethany in the usual way, urging his disciple to be " sometimes busy with Martha . . . and sometimes with Mary ... at the feet of our Lord with humility, in prayers and holy thoughts and in Contemplation of Him " (p. 320). For Hilton, the one great truth is " the uncreated ', love of God," and communion with Him in love and ¦ humihty. " Ask, then, of God nothing but this 'j gift of love, which is the Holy Ghost. For among all the gifts that our Lord giveth there is none so good, nor so profitable, so worthy, nor so excellent as this is. For there is no gift of God that is both 109 Studies in Christian Mysticism the giver and the gift, but this gift of love " (p. 254). It is the love of God which " cleanseth us from our sins," and " stirreth us up to exercise ourselves " in all virtues. The assertion that the Mystics, in finding God, " leave Jesus behind," is wholly inapplicable to Hilton. In his teaching, as in his experience, the desire for God and for Jesus are one. " He worketh this desire in thee, and giveth it thee ; and He it is that desireth in thee, and He it is that is desired ; He is all, and He doeth all " (p. 198). " Jesus is endless might, wisdom and goodness, righteousness, truth, holiness and mercy " (p. 299). "He is all-sovereign might and all- sovereign verity and all-sovereign goodness " (p. 250). " Jesus Christ, that blessed Person, God and Man, Son of the Virgin Mary — that is all good ness, endless wisdom, love and sweetness, thy joy, thy glory, and thy everlasting bliss, thy God, thy Lord, and thy salvation " (p. 67). " For wot thou well, that what thou feelest of Him, be it never so much, yea, though thou wert ravished with St. Paul into the third heaven, yet hast thou not found Jesus as He is in His joy ; know thou, or feel thou never so much of Him, He is still above it " (p. 68). Hilton's guidance into and along the " Mystic Way " is at once clear, direct and practicable. He knows full well that " neither grace alone, without the full working of the soul so far as it can, nor the man's working alone, without grace, bringeth the soul to the reform ing in feeling, the which reforming consisteth in no A Typical Mystic perfect love and charity. But that both joined together, bringeth into a soul the blessed feeling of perfect love. The which grace cannot rest fully, but only on humble souls that be full of the fear of God" (p. 183). -—'The which grace, for its part, is most willing and ready to shine to all creatures, and enter into the souls of men, that will but be willing to receive it, even as the sun shineth upon all creatures bodily, where it is not hindered " (p. 172). " A soul that would know spiritual things needs! first to have the knowledge of itself." " Withdraw I thy thoughts from all bodily things outward, and from minding of thy own body, also from all thy five senses, as much as thou canst, and think on the nature of a reasonable soul spiritually, as thouwouldst 1 think for to know any virtue, as justice, humility) or any other. Right so think that a soul is a life immortal, invisible, and hath in itself a power to know the sovereign verity, and for to love the sovereign goodness which is God ; when thou seest this, then feelest thou somewhat of thyself " (p. 227). " Never theless, I say not that thy soul should rest still in this knowing, but it shall by this seek a higher knowledge above itself, and that is the nature of God, for the soul is but a glass in the which thou shouldst see God spiritually " (p. 228). " For thy soul and my soul and every rational soul is an image, and that a worthy one, for it is the image of God " (p. 133). " It behoveth thee to delve deep in thy-r heart, for therein Jesus is hid, and cast out perfectly; all loves, and likings, sorrows and fears of all earthly! things, and so shall thou find wisdom, that is; Jesus " (p. 70). " See then the mercy and courtesy of Jesus. Thou hast lost Him, but where ? Soothly in thy house, that is to say, in thy soul, that if thou hadst lost all thy reason of thy soul by in Studies in Christian Mysticism its first sin, thou shouldst never have found Him again : but He left thee thy reason, and so He is still in thy soul, and never is quite lost out of it. Nevertheless thou art never the nearer Him till thou hast found Him. He is in thee, though He be lost from thee ; but thou art not in Him till thou hast found Him. This is His mercy also, that He would suffer Himself to be lost only there, where He may be found, so that thou needest not run to Rome, nor to Jerusalem to seek Him there, but turn thy thoughts unto thy own soul, where He is hid " (pp. 71 — 2). By humility and love, the soul finds God. " Humility saith, I am nothing, I have nothing ; Love saith, I covet nothing, but one, and that is Jesus " (p. 188). And by prayer, the soul is made ready and able to rejoice in God. " Not that thou shouldst thereby make our Lord know what thou desirest, for He knoweth well enough what thou needest, but to dispose thee and imake thee ready and able thereby, as a clean i vessel, to receive the grace which our Lord would freely give thee, which grace cannot be felt till thou !be exercised and purified by the fire of desire in .devout prayer. For though it be so that prayer is not the cause for which our Lord giveth grace, never theless it is a way or means by which grace freely given cometh into the soul " (p. 34). " For prayer is nothing else but an ascending or getting up of the desire of the heart into God, by withdrawing of it from all earthly thoughts " (pv 35). " And though thou be at prayer, or at thy devotions, that thou thinkest loth to break off, for that thou thinkest that thou oughtest not leave God for to 112 A Typical Mystic speak with anyone, I think not so in this case, for if thou be wise thou shalt not leave God, but thou shalt find Him, and have Him, and see Him, in thy neighbour, as well as in prayer, only in another manner " (p. 119). In reading the books of the Mystics many, I think, must have felt confused and troubled by the use of unfamiliar terms for spiritual experience. Again and again it seems as though some secret of life were about to be disclosed, and yet the secret, if such it be, is illusive. This, I am sure, is especially true of Theosophy, and indeed must be, for its secret whatsoever it be, is revealed only to the fully initiated. But pure, religious Mysticism is not of this character. Its secret is an open one ; it is the mystery of love, hid indeed from the unloving, and not to be known by reason, or scholar-1 ship, but only by loving. Where love is, all else! is that is vital to true religion ; where love is not, then ah is wanting. This is the Mysticism of Walter Hilton. He recognised the possibility of confusion and troubled thoughts through the use of strange terms, and he guarded himself against this, using, for the most part, simple and homely terms, and where other terms are used explaining them with care. Here is a passage which illustrates what I mean. He has been speaking of how love opens the spiritual eye 113 H Studies in Christian Mysticism by cleansing the soul from all deadly sins ; and he adds : " This opening of the spiritual eye is that light some darkness and rich nought that I spake of before, fand it may be called purity of spirit and spiritual rest, inward stillness and peace of conscience, highness of thought and loneliness of soul, a lively feeling of grace and retiredness of heart, the watchful sleep of the spouse and tasting of heavenly savour, burning in love, and shining in light, the gate of Contemplation and reforming in feelings. All these expressions are found in holy writings of divers men, for every one of them speaketh according to his feeling in grace. And though all these be divers in show of words yet are they all one in meaning and verity ; for that soul which through visiting of grace hath one of them hath all " (pp. 273 — 4). The difficulty of terms may repel some, and so bring to an abrupt conclusion their study of the Mystics, though the really serious difficulty is of another character — we are hindered by our own sloth. Others there are who have to fight with their own fears and self -distrust. To these Walter Hilton speaks. He bids all who are " in the way " beware of their enemies. Certain temptations are peculiar to earnest souls ; and against these he forewarns. These are — the backward look, which would recall past sins unconfessed, or but imper fectly confessed ; the sense of unworthiness of the love of God, anticipations of failure, the fear and opposition of man, flattery and vain pleasing. Under 114 A Typical Mystic each of these heads, Hilton has very wise and helpful counsel (p. 192^). But the two deadly sins against which those who have been enlightened are most earnestly warned, are : " presumption and exalting of himself " and " the down-putting and disdaining of his neighbour " (p. 209). "It is no mastery to watch and fast till thy head ache ; nor to run to Rome or Jerusalem on pilgrimage upon thy bare feet ; nor for to stir about and preach, or if thou wouldst turn all men by thy preaching. Nor is it any mastery to build churches or chapels, or to feed poor men and build hospitals. But it is mastery for a man to love his neighbour in charity, and wisely hate his sin and love the man " (P- 93)- Upon all, the duty of ceaseless endeavour after richer and fuller spiritual life is solemnly urged — " for a soul cannot stand still always in one state, for it is either profiting in grace, or decaying through sin." Much more might be written, but enough, I hope, has been given to attract serious students of Mysti cism to Walter Hilton. One further word only must be added. Hilton was a loyal son of his Church, himself in its official ministry, and faithful to all its observances. A firm faith in all the Articles and Sacraments of the Church, and obedi ence to all the laws and ordinances of prelates and rulers, is, as we should expect, unhesitatingly enforced. 115 h 2 CHAPTER X SPIRITUAL RELIGION Mysticism is the experience of God, the immediacy and reality of God in us, and of God as known to us in and through Jesus Christ. The inward experience must be based upon and controUed by the outward Revelation ; only thus can it be freed from aberrations. This is the Mysticism not of thought or of feeling alone, but of inspiration and of power ; and this, as I hold, is the true religious Mysticism, as witnessed to by the great Christian Mystics. It is the realisation of the eternal truth ; " Ye are a Sanctuary of God, and the Spirit of God dwelleth in you." " There in that Supreme Region and sacred Temple of the Soul the Highest Good delights to dwell, to manifest Himself and to give Himself to the Creature, in a way above sense and all under standing." — so writes the author of The Spiritual Guide. In another place he quotes the words of St. Augustine : "I, Lord, went wandering like a strayed sheep, seeking Thee with anxious reasonings without, whilst Thou wast within me. I wearied myself 116 Spiritual Religion much in looking for Thee without, and yet Thou hast Thy habitation within me. I went round the1 streets and squares of the City of this world seeking Thee ; and I found Thee not, because in vain I j sought without for Him who was within myself." This is the message of the Mystics, their discovery for themselves and their testimony to us. Whatever their outward condition of life, whether that of the Monk, the Priest, or the Layman, and whatever their ecclesiastical beliefs and observances, this was their one vital unity, a religion of the Spirit, the experience of God as Spirit in direct fellowship with the spirit which man also is ; and this fellow ship is in love, with God who is Love, and in the love of God, a love which is known best, and always expressed, in love one to another. " The Holy Ghost is Love " — so they found, and taught. God and His gift are one, for " God is Love." This is the truth of their experience, but they had not known it thus without the " Sacred Humanity " — meditation upon which was practised and enforced by all. Indeed, in their experience, no distinction is known between Christ and God. " It is all One," is their witness. We reach the same conclusion as to the essential element in their Mysticism from their doctrine of Prayer. It has to be confessed that their terminology and their systematisings are very 117 Studies in Christian Mysticism bewildering. There is no general agreement, at least I have found it impossible to draw up any common method for prayer. Nor is this to be regretted ; we are thrown back upon the underlying unity. The one truth which has to find a place in our thought of prayer is its universality for life — we are to " pray without ceasing." Once and again this Apostolic injunction arrests attention when prayer is being discussed. Hence, over and above all instructions as to methods of prayer, we find definitions which cover wider ground. Thus it is said : " Prayer is an elevation of the mind to God " — " the desire of the soul turned to God " — " the application of the heart to God and the inward exercise of love." And when the hindrances to special times and acts of prayer are thought of, the true spirit of prayer, which should inspire and control all life, is at once perceived, and it is said : " True prayer consists when the soul loves " and is found " in recognition of the Will of God." The terse saying of the Lady Julian gathers up the whole truth : " Prayer oneth the soul to God." With this in mind it will not appear strange to us that in a book like the Imitation, there is no special instruction as to Prayer. The soul " oned " to God needs no further guidance. All else in the devout life will follow naturally. So again we 118 Spiritual Religion reach our conclusion. " To enjoy God without \ intermediary," the first-hand experience of God, i is the essential truth of Christian Mysticism. We are then, as it seems to me, thrown back upon the Bible as the one sure and best guide in the Mystic Way. Even in the Hebrew Scriptures we have Mysticism of the finest type. It was out of an intense and vital religious experience that the great Prophets spoke and wrote. God was a reality, a present reality, to them. The Word of the Lord was " as a fire in their heart," a very " burden " upon the soul. It is, however, in one or two of the Psalms that the utterance of personal experience is most direct. The soul that had the experience of God which the CXXXIXth Psalm described was a Mystic of a true type. He speaks of a dual life of which he is conscious, of a Presence that follows him every where, and from which there is no possible escape. A Presence, moreover, not by his side, haunting him like his own shadow, but a presence within, where thought works, and feeling is stirred, searching the heart, trying the thoughts, judging every life movement at its secret spring. A second self, an uprush of " the subliminal consciousness " — not that, nor anything like it. It is a greater than self, greater and holier, with august authority. Not a law simply ; law is impersonal, inarticulate. Not 119 Studies in Christian Mysticism a voice merely, but a Righteous Will, as truly personal as is the soul itself. A Power, an Authority, a Will which encompasses his life ; a Presence which besets him behind and before and lays its hand upon the centre of his life. Resisted it may be, and silenced, at least for the moment, but only to re-assert its authority in the first calm hour of self- communion. Forgotten in sleep, but with him again the moment he awakes from sleep, searching him through and through, dealing out blame and praise with impartial judgment. Had we written the Psalm, we should have spoken of " Conscience," and under a mere name concealed our ignorance. This Mystic speaks of God. This, he tells us, is God's Presence in the Soul. God is found there, bound up with the soul's hfe. But the highest Mysticism is not possible except where there is the richest content in the name God. The experience does not give the revelation of Truth, it turns knowledge into Life and belief into Faith. Hence the place of Jesus Christ in Mystical Religion — the Christ of History, and the Christ of Faith, for the two cannot be separated. It is in the life of Jesus that we must study Mysticism at its highest. In His Life we see what perfect com munion with God is, the Human and the Divine perfectly at One. And the power of that Life continues. That was 120 Spiritual Religion the experience of the first Apostles, and it has been the experience of His followers through the centuries. The great mystical sayings of St. Paul have this for their significance. " I live, yet not I, Christ liveth in me." " Alive unto God in Christ Jesus." " Your hfe is hid with Christ in God." " I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me." " Christ in you the hope of glory." It is not in the extraordinary raptures of the great Apostle that we find his Mysticism, but in this full and rich personal consciousness of union with Christ. For him " the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord " was the great Faith. Through all his wonderful activities it was " the love of Christ " which con strained him. For him love was the fulfilling of the law. To him we owe the inspired chapter on Christian Love. The Mystic Way is ever the Way of the Cross. " He that would come after Me let him deny himself, and take up his cross and follow Me." To live the Christ-life was the one hope and prayer of the Mystics. " I am not now asking you to meditate on Him nor to produce great thoughts, nor to feel deep devotion : I only ask you to look at Him. Who can prevent you turning the eyes of your soul on our Lord ? " It is St. Teresa who so bids us " consider Christ." " If you feel happy, think of Him at His Resurrection. If you have trials to 121 Studies in Christian Mysticism bear, if you are sorrowful^ watch Him on His way to the garden." " Christ who is our life," the Way for us to walk in, the Truth for us to experience, the Life to reproduce His life in ours — it is thus we know what life truly is, " the realisation of human personality as characterised by, and consummated in, the indwelling reality of the Spirit of Christ, which is God " (Atonement and Personality, p. 312). He who would quicken that life in others must know it in himself. This is the strange, mystic power of preaching, and we welcome its reappear ance in the preaching of our own day. In every great religious revival this has been the secret force. It was the appeal and persuasion of personal experience which drew crowds to listen to Gerard the Great, and which arrested men of all classes, and turned their lives into better ways. " He preached out of his own life — what he knew." It was this power which was behind the pre-ref ormation [ in England. " God is our best Master, and ready | to teach true men all things profitable and needful 1 for their souls " — so wrote Wyclif, and out of this direct teaching he, and his itinerant preachers, appealed to the people. It was this power which Luther knew, and used. His own vital religious experience urged him forward in all his great work. He discovered for himself, and preached as the Gospel for all, the true 122 Spiritual Religion . Mystical Faith, that nothing is received from God \ because we are worthy, but we receive God's grace i in Christ that we may become worthy. All is of ' God, of His great Love in Christ — the forgiveness of sins, the cleansing of His Spirit, the gift of Himself — and taking His gifts and Himself, for Giver and gifts are one, the soul that so experiences God is moved to all spiritual endeavour, and freely gives itself in love. " He is our justification " was Luther's great saying. " Christ in you the hope of glory " is the Mystic faith. It was this power of personal experience and personal appeal which was in the movement of the Wesleys, as their hymns show. It was not until after his own deeper, more real and personal experience of the things of God that John Wesley's great work became possible. The story bears repetition. At a meeting of a Moravian Society in London " there entered into his soul, as by a flash of light, a joyful assurance that his sins were freely forgiven." So he testified everywhere of the Grace of God which might be experienced in renewing power anywhere and everywhere where God and the soul might meet. And this is the message our age calls for. On every hand there is the cry of a great need. Religion, it is felt, has again become too formal, and unspiri- tual ; activities abound, interesting, even eloquent, preaching is not lacking, but the note of urgency and 123 Studies in Christian Mysticism reality is missing. The need is for " religion in its most acute, intense, and living stage." The rebuke of Thomas a Kempis rests upon us : " We are glad to see others perfect : and yet we mend not our j own faults." We are so busy in religious things \ that we have no time for serious religion. The machinery is there, and " up-to-date," but the moving power is whoUy inadequate. St. Teresa's criticism of the preachers of her own day is, I fear, only too true of many in ours : " They have a good intention, and their work is good ; yet still few amend their lives. But how is it that there are not many who, in consequence of these sermons, abstain from public sins ? Well, I think it is because the preachers are highly sensible men. They are not burning with the great fire of the love of God, as the Apostles were, casting worldly prudence aside ; and so their fire throws out but little heat " (Life, p. 131). During the last few years I have had opportunities of hearing preachers in many parts of Great Britain, and, with notable exceptions, the impression left upon my mind is that preachers generally do not seem to take their great work seriously to heart. They are " highly sensible men," and can write very interesting essays, but too often they have no message, no " burden of the Lord " which they must deliver. They sound no note of Mysticism, and rarely speak out of an intense personal experience. 124 Spiritual Religion " Wanted is what ? "^-i believe the almost unanimous answer to that question by our religious leaders would be : the revival of personal religion. " What we want is not to know Truth, Beauty, and Goodness — though that is necessary by the way ; it is to be true, beautiful, and good. We want God in us and with us — not immanently and naturally as He is in everything, but personally and tran- scendently as He is only in those who are themselves in Him, whose faith and hope and love are in Him, and whose holiness, righteousness, and life are His in them " (The Constructive Quarterly, March, 1913, p. 14). As the same writer puts the need in his valuable preface to Liberal and Mystical Writings of William Law : " We want a real God, the living Christ, not only in meditation but in action, not in our retreats only, but in our furthest advances, in our most active enterprises and our most enter prising activities." "Not only in meditation," true; but first, and, at the present time, most surely in our meditation. It is this which is most lacking. We must feed the fires of the Divine within. 125 CHAPTER XI THE MYSTIC LIFE Since the foregoing chapters were written a new contribution to the question before us has appeared. The author of Mysticism has again laid all students of the subject under obligation by her serious consideration of the relation between Mysticism and Christianity, which is discussed in her new book, The Mystic Way. The position held is clearly stated. " All the doctrines and all the experiences characteristic of genuine Christian Mysticism can be found in the New Testament ; and I believe that its emergence as a definite type of spiritual life coincides with the emergence of Christianity itself, in the person of its Founder " (Preface, p. vii.). This statement is indeed most important. It has this obvious advantage — it narrows the question, and by defining the field of discussion, makes possible definite issues. Mysticism, in the wide field of Christian history, is far too large a subject for adequate treatment in any book, or indeed by any single writer. But the Mysticism of the Founder of Christianity can be so considered, and its very earnest study is pressed upon every thoughtful Christian. 126 The Mystic Life The really vital question is thus raised — What is the very heart and essence of Christian Mysticism ? The author rejects, and rightly rejects, the idea that " Christian Mysticism is no integral part of Christianity." The attainment of the " Kingdom " is urged upon all. " He that would come after Me let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow Me " is the way of Discipleship, the only way. It is not possible to escape the conclusion that what Christianity meant for its Founder it means also for all who are called by His Name. This was Apostolic Christianity. That " Christ is our Life, to reproduce His life in ours " — is the uniform teaching of St. Paul. This was his own most earnest prayer and endeavour, and it was ever his Gospel message. He counted himself and his fellow- workers as " stewards of the mysteries of God," mysteries " kept in silence through times eternal, but now manifested," " the mystery which hath been hid from all ages and generations : but now hath it been manifested to His saints . . . which is Christ in you, the hope of glory." Not for Himself alone, but for all " saints," for " all that call upon the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ in every place, their Lord and ours," the " life in Christ " was and is an essential element in their religion. This is Christian Mysticism, not a stage in, but an essential element of, any life which is truly Studies in Christian Mysticism Christian. It is just this which we mean by the statement that Christianity is a Life, a vital experi ence of religion, the direct personal and all-control ling, all-inspiring fellowship of the Spirit of Christ and the spirit which is man. It is exceedingly desirable that we should under stand the terms we use in any discussion, and most of all in this discussion. " I give and demand change for phrases," was the test principle of Maurice. It is very necessary to apply the test to the term " Mysticism." Far too often it is used as a synonym for mystery or mystification, " a dreamy contempla tion on ideas that have no foundation in human experience," to quote a dictionary definition. This, I think, must be insisted upon ; the " Mystic Way " is not to be identified with Mysticism. A form of experience, its interpretation, or sequence, is not the experience itself. Life is ever more than its forms and manifestations. In the book now before us is the following state ment : " The great Christians of the primitive time, the great Mystics in whom their spirit has lived on, exhibit, one and all, an organic growth, pass through a series of profound psychic changes and re-adjust ments, by which they move from the condition of that which we like to call the ' normal man ' to that state of spiritual maturity, of an actually enhanced power of dealing with circumstances, which they sometimes call the ' Unitive Life.' 128 The Mystic Life This sequence of psychological states is the ' Mystic Way,' which gives its title to my book " (Preface, p. viii.). As a matter of fact, it is not possible to justify this absolute statement. There are great Mystics concerning whose personal life we know too little to be able to speak thus of them. Their writings we know, but their experience we do not know. This is especiaUy true of " The Johannine Mystic." This our author has to admit. She writes : " In the fourth Gospel we see nothing of this ' process of becoming,' though the life presented is the Pauhne life mirrored in a different temperament. This book is written from the standpoint of one in whom the ' great work ' of readjustment is already accomplished ; and who has ' entered the Kingdom ' and knows himself a member of a new order, in habited by a new life " (p. 219). Whether or not this Mystic " passed through a series of profound psychic changes and readjust ments " it is quite impossible to say. He knew " The Life "—and that is everything. What that life was we can also say ; and in declaring it we define true Christian Mysticism. Itwas the ' ' Eternal Life," or again to change the phrase, Spiritual Life," a life in closest fellowship with the Eternal Spirit. A " sequence of psychological states " is not Mysticism, however marked that sequence may be in the experience of certain Mystics. As in Theology, 129 1 Studies in Christian Mysticism so also in Mysticism, the craving after a weU-defined and orderly system is fatal. It is now generaUy recognised that no systematic theology can be built up out of the Christian Scriptures. The same conclusion in regard to Mysticism is forced upon us by a somewhat wide study of the writings of the Mystics. The endeavour to force aU through the same mould of experience utterly fails. Some of us can recaU the time when this was the method foUowed with regard to Conversion, and Christian Discipleship. The method broke down utterly in face of the facts of life. Now it is just here, I think, where the author of the Mystic Way altogether fails. With the assertion that Christian Mysticism must find its highest iUustration in the person of its Founder, we are in fuUest agreement, but this is not to say that each and aU of the stages of the Mystic Way, as usuaUy described, and as illustrated in the fives of some Mystics, must be found in the Life of Christ. Yet this is Miss UnderhiU's con tention. In the Scale, or Ladder of Perfection, we are told, are these stages : Conversion, Purgation, IUumina- tion, the Dark Night of the Soul, the State of Union. In the life of Jesus these are said to correspond to the Baptism ; Temptation in the Wilderness ; the Early Ministry culminating in the Transfiguration ; the Way of the Cross — Gethsemane and Calvary ; 130 The Mystic Life the Cross and Resurrection. Such a scheme breaks down utterly in face of the Gospel narratives. The impression which that Life makes upon us is not thus to be systematised. Jesus appears before us, from the first, as equal to His task. That the Baptism meant much to Jesus Himself we cannot doubt — but we cannot believe that then, for the first time, " the strange, new life latent in Jesus of Nazareth suddenly flooded His human conscious ness. That consciousness was abruptly lifted to new levels ; suddenly became aware of Reality, and of its own complete participation in Reality " (p. 87). The thirty years of silence were not thus empty and unspiritual. The Baptism was the Ordination of one already prepared, the solemn and public dedication of Himself to the great work over which He had long brooded. The Temptation itself turns upon this pre vious spiritual preparation. It was essentiaUy related to His Mission, how that Mission now entered upon should be fulfiUed, and in each of the three great trials of faith, victory was won by the life in and with God already attained. The Transfiguration also has the like significance. The " decease which He should accomplish at Jerusalem " was the subject of His meditation and prayer. That there were great crises in the life of Jesus is clear indeed, but these were always incident to His Mission, and how they were met reveals the Mind of Christ ; for great 131 12 Studies in Christian Mysticism critical moments do not fashion the soul — they reveal it, prove what has been and is. Even so Gethsemane and Calvary express the victory of the wUderness. So, as I read the Story, the impression throughout is of One equal to His Task, " made perfect through the things which He suffered," but perfect most of aU as Saviour and Redeemer of men. Even in the skilful hands of the author, this scheme, as applied to Jesus, breaks down altogether. The admissions are significant — and fatal to the scheme. Thus she writes : " There is one deeply significant difference between this psychological crisis in the life of Jesus and its lesser equivalent in the lives of Christian and other Mystics. I mean the total absence of the ' sense of sin ' " (p. 89). Again, we read : " His growth in the Transcendent Order was of an unequalled swiftness, that a personal and impassioned consciousness of unbroken union with Reality was from the first the centre of His secret life " (p. 145). The words which I have emphasised are, I think, a tacit admission that the endeavour to interpret the one Supreme Experience by any experience less than itself has failed, and must fail. The same conclusion is forced upon us by the following comparison of the experience of St. Paul with that of Jesus : " Once more we see the enormous difference in quality between the nature of Jesus 132 The Mystic Life and that of His first and greatest successor. With Him, the stress and effort which is felt behind all Paul's attainments are concentrated into the two swift and furious battles of the Wilderness and of Gethsemane " (p. 172). From a careful study of the author's third chapter : "St. Paul and the Mystic Way," I have been forced to the same conclusion as to the supreme importance of distinguishing between a " sequence of psycho logical states " and Christian Mysticism. The Mysticism of Jesus was His Oneness with the Father, a life whoUy " oned," to use the common mystic term. The Mysticism of St. Paul was expressed by himself : " Christ liveth in me." The peculiar form of certain of his experiences was determined by his individual psychical constitution. With this qualification, the assertion may be accepted that St. Paul " is the supreme example of the Christian Mystic ; of a ' change of mind ' result ing in an enormous dower of vitality : of a career of impassioned activity, of ' divine fecundity ' second only to that of Jesus Himself " (p. 159). When, however, it is said that his conversion " was of course characteristically mystical " we must exercise caution. " The light, the voice, the blind ness," are accidents, not essentials of that " vivid consciousness of a personal and crucial encounter with the spiritual world " (p. 160). Every true 133 Studies in Christian Mysticism conversion is a mystical experience, but there is no one form of the experience which is to be looked for in every case. She " whose heart the Lord opened " experienced conversion as truly as did St. Paul. Again, when it is said : " St. Paul's proceedings after his conversion are no less characteristic of the peculiar mystic type. His first instinct was an instinct of retreat " (p. 163), we must press the question of the significance of this retreat for St. Paul himself. His own words tell what this was : " that I might preach Him among the Gentiles." It was for preparation for his fife-work that he withdrew into seclusion. Nor may the period of self-discipline be limited to any definite part of his career. AU through his life, and up to its close, he " counted not himself to have apprehended ; " but ever " pressed on toward the goal . " One iUustr ation of how this attempt to work the Apostle's experience into the mould of the Mystic Way is characteristic of all systematisers — the facts are more or less forced to fit the theory. Much that the author has to say of the Apostle's inward life as revealed in his successive letters is helpful and suggestive, but the inferences are by no means convincing. The Epistle to the Romans holds a critical place, and a very special and individual interpretation of the 7th and 8th Chapters is essential, if the author's contention is to be established. The experience 134 The Mystic Life described in these chapters must fit in with one critical period in the Apostle's life, one stage of his spiritual development — " the last purification of personality," " the very frontier of the new life," " the moment of supreme attainment." Somewhat full quotation is necessary to do the writer justice : " The epistle to the Romans appears to be the literary expression of the last phase in Paul's long struggle for transcendence. In the 7th and 8th chapters of that most wonderful of letters, we seem to see the travail of his interior life coming to its term, the new state towards which his growth was directed established at last " (p. 183). And again, writing of the contrast between the experiences described in the two chapters : " The sudden wild happiness of the spirit caught up to supreme communion with the Absolute has seldom found finer expression than this : here another personality seems to speak from the heart broken prisoner who had cried but a page or two earlier, ' Who shall deliver me from the body of this death ? ' " (p. 185). All turns upon the assumption that the experience of the 7th Chapter is the Apostle's own experience, and at one definitely defined period in his life, and, further, upon the assumption that the confidence and gladness of the 8th Chapter foUow that experi ence almost immediately. This most important fact, as it seems to me, has been overlooked : the experiences of the 7th Chapter are not summed up 135 Studies in Christian Mysticism in the cry of seeming hopelessness and despair, " Who shall deliver me out of (R.V.) the body of this death ? " That cry does not end the chapter, and very certainly it does not complete the Apostle's thought. Drawing upon his knowledge of himself, and upon his insight into human life, he gathers up and concentrates in a single portraiture " aU the struggles of the natural man with temptation," his conflict before Christ has " shined upon him," and then, in one triumphant outburst, he proclaims his Gospel — " I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord." This is the only possible conclusion of the Apostle's description, and to omit this is to miss the very aim and purpose of all that has gone before. Up to this point, in that finely imaginative and dramatic picture, there is no word of Christianity, and for him to write of human sorrows and conflicts without one word of hope was altogether impossible. Indeed the 7th Chapter of Romans has its text in an earlier letter : " The sting of death is sin ; and the power of sin is the law : but thanks be to God, which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ." However we may interpret his words in the 7th Chapter, whether of his own actual experience, or of that of the " natural man," it is quite certain that for the Apostle himself, when he wrote his 136 The Mystic Life Epistle, the conflict was long ended, ended indeed in its bitterness and severity of inward strife when he " saw the Lord," and yielded himself His servant to do His will. He who could say, out of the fulness of his own personal experience, " I have been crucified with Christ ; yet I live ; and yet no longer I, but Christ liveth in me," has already rejoiced in that freedom wherewith Christ makes His people free. For, and this is the very Gospel which the Apostle preached, Christ brings deliverance from this terrible inward conflict, wherever and whenever He is known in His saving grace. The abnormal experiences of the Apostle are too Well known to need detaUed reference. But I must again protest against an appeal to these as proving their necessary association with Christian Mysticism. " Visions and revelations of the Lord," ecstatic utterances, gifts of tongues, and of healing, found their place in his life. In this connection his personal testimony may be quoted : "I thank God I speak with tongues more than you all." But it is altogether to misjudge the case if we omit to quote the words which foUow : " Howbeit in the Church I had rather speak five words with my understanding, that I might instruct others also, than ten thousand words in a tongue." The Apostle's " thorn in the flesh " is counted " a 137 Studies in Christian Mysticism more human mark of his thoroughly mystical temperament " (p. 174), an evidence that he experi enced that " mystic iU health " which, we are told, is " the natural result, and not the pathological cause, of the characteristic activities of the Mystics." The breakdown of the physical constitution has often been the penalty of altogether excessive and unwise self-discipline, against which many of the Mystics warn their disciples. Out of this excess and consequent " ill health " have come aU manner of abnormalities, exaggerations and superstitions, but surely it is an assumption to connect the Apostle's "thorn in the flesh" with this condition. It is not necessary to discuss the origin of St. Paul's bodily affliction, concerning which it is quite impossible to come to any conclusion. It were strange indeed if one who had endured aU the labours, and afflictions, and sufferings recounted in his second letter to the Corinthians should know no permanent disability. Of this " mystic iU-health," there is no trace, no hint, in the life of Jesus, nor can we admit the thought of it when speaking of His experience, a further evidence that the systematising of that Divine Life is impossible. It becomes evident that in this discussion of Mysticism, we really approach a far more vital question, the question as to Christianity itself, 138 The Mystic Life what it is, and especially what makes a Christian. FundamentaUy different answers to this question cannot but result in divergent ideas as to Chrsitian Mysticism. If, for instance, it is held " that men become Christians, in the first instance, by incorpora tion into one visible Christian society, and then, after that, are bound to realise individually their Christian privileges," then, of course, the mystical experience belongs to some and not to all who are " in Christ." Underlying the discussion of Mysticism there is thus discovered the old controversy of " Justifica tion by Faith." With this statement I am in fullest agreement : " By ' faith ' man centres himself in the spiritual order, identifies himself with its interests, and thus justifies himself as a spiritual creation ; for the essence of Pauline faith is not ' belief ' but awareness of, attention to, union with the ' Kingdom ' — con vinced consciousness of a life lived in the atmosphere of God" (p. 199). It is even so, but with this added truth : " Without faith it is impossible to please God," and without faith there is no Christian man, and faith is essentially mystical. It is this " new kind of life," this " new type of human consciousness," which is bound up inseparably with Christianity in its personal element. Far then from being " the few chosen out of the many caUed," or a " thin bright chain of the Christian Mystics stretching across the centuries," the true 139 Studies in Christian Mysticism Mystics are a multitude which no man can number through all the Christian centuries ; the salt of the earth, and the light of the world, because " with unveiled face reflecting as a mirror the glory of the Lord," they have been " transformed into the same image from glory to glory, even as from the Lord the Spirit." Christianity has been defined as " eternal life in the midst of time, by the strength and under the eyes of God." The definition is not complete, but it is so far true, for Christianity is a life, the life of faith and of love, of love to God and love to man. Where this life is known, there is the Christian, where it is not known Christ is Himself unknown. Here the terms " initiate " and " uninitiated," as used in the old Mystics, cannot apply as defining two degrees of Christian life. The life is there or it is not, and in the measure that it is known, in that measure is the life itself mystical, spiritual. The conclusion at which we arrive has been thus stated : " The Mystics who have enriched the content and meaning of religion, insist that true Mysticism is neither passive nor negative nor theoretical. It is a type of religion, according to them, in which all the deep-lying powers of the personal life come into positive exercise and function, so that there results an experience, not merely emotional, not merely intellectual, not merely volitional, through which the soul finds itself in a love-relation with the Living 140 The Mystic Life God. There are all possible stages and degrees of the experience of this ' relation,' from simple aware ness of the soul's Divine Companion to a rapt consciousness of union with the One and Only Reality. The term ' mystical ' is properly used for any type of religion which insists upon an immediate inward revelation of God ^within the sphere of personal experience " (The Beginnings of Quakerism, Preface by Dr. Rufus M. Jones). 141 CHAPTER XII QUAKERISM A careful study of Quakerism, especially in its beginnings, is essential to the right understanding and interpretation of Religious Mysticism. This study is now greatly facilitated by the publication of The Beginnings of Quakerism, by William C. Braithwaite, B.A., LL.B., and to this book I am greatly indebted, and any references, not otherwise stated, are to this publication. In all writings on Mysticism reference has to be made to George Fox, and his most striking experi ences. Readers of The Varieties of Religious Experience wiU recall how these experiences are pressed in evidence. One sentence, however, should not be overlooked. " The Quaker religion," writes William James, " is something which it is impossible to overpraise. In a day of shams, it was a religion of veracity rooted in spiritual inwardness, and a return to something more hke the original Gospel truth than men had ever known in England." It was out of this sense of the unreality of religion as witnessed on every hand that Quakerism had its origin. 142 Quakerism The experience of Fox himself in this respect, and his own personal testimony, are well known. The mere profession of religion, joined as it might be, with great learning, was not enough. From all hope of help from priests and ministers of religion, Fox withdrew more and more into solitude. Rebuked for his absence from the Church Services, he replied : " There was an anointing within man to teach him, and that the Lord would teach His people Himself." " When aU my hope in them and in aU men was gone, so that I had nothing outwardly to help me, nor could teU what to do, then, O then I heard a voice which said, ' There is one, even Christ Jesus, that can speak to thy condition,' and, when I heard it, my heart did leap for joy. . . . Then the Lord did gently lead me along, and did let me see His love, which was endless and eternal, and surpasseth all the knowledge that men have in the natural state or can get by history or books : and that love did let me see myself as I was without Him "(p. 34)- This was Fox's spiritual discovery — the disclosure of the Divine Presence within, himself taught directly of God, himself God's Sanctuary. Hence his great doctrine of the Inward Light, " the Light that lighteth every man," and his call to all was to live in the Light. His own experience of newness of life, through the indwelling Spirit, was the ground of his confidence for others. Out of this inward compulsion