THE MESSAGES TO THE SEVEN CHURCHES OF ASIA MINOR. THE MESSAGES TO THE SEVEN CHURCHES OF ASIA MINOR: AN EXPOSITION OF THE FIRST THREE CHAPTERS OF THE BOOK OF THE REVELATION. BY THE REV. ANDREW TAIT, LL.D., F.R.S.E., Canon of St. Mary's Cathedral, Tuam, and Rector of Moylough, Co. Gahvay. MaKdpios 6 TT)puv Toiis X1S70VS ttjs Xpo4>-nTE(a5 TOV PlPXCoV TOVTOV Rev. xxii. 7. ITmtbon; HODDER AND STOUGHTON, 27, PATERNOSTER RO"W. MDCCCLXXXIV. (All rights reserved.) Butler &= Tanner, The Selwood Printing Works, Frome, and London. TO THE HONOURABLE AND RIGHT REVEREND CHARLES BRODRICK BERNARD, D.D., LORD BISHOP OF TUAM, KILLALA, AND ACHONRY, In dratifnl %tta^mtian NOT ONLY OF THE PRIVILEGES AND BLESSINGS WHICH ARE INSEPARABLY CONNECTED WITH HIS SACRED OFFICE, BUT ALSO IN ADMIRATION OF HIS HIGH PERSONAL QUALITIES BOTH OF HEAD AND HEART, THESE PAGES IN ELUCIDATION OF OUR BLESSED LORD'S LAST WORDS TO THE CHURCHES, ARE MOST RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED. PREFACE. Although no portion of the New Testament possesses more interest for the Christian student, or conveys a deeper instruction, than the first three chapters of the Book of the Revelation, which contain the Epistles to the Seven Churches of Asia Minor, perhaps there are fewer expositions of these Epistles, in separate form, than of any other section of Sacred Scripture. Next to the Holy Land, Asia Minor has associations and memories which make it dear to every Christian heart. It may be called the cradle of Christianity ; for if Judea was the birthplace of its Founder, Asia Minor was the scene of its earliest trials and triumphs. Here St. Paul spent several years of his life, and he wrote Epistles to, at least, three of its Churches. Towards Asia Minor he directed his steps on each of his three missionary journeys. At Ephesus he placed Timothy, whom he calls his own son in the faith ; and there is no more affecting address than that delivered by St. Paul, when bidding the elders of Ephesus farewell at Miletus. Possibly after the martyrdom of St. Paul, St. John left Jeru salem, and settled at Ephesus; but we find that he was barlished under Domitian, A,D. 95. viii Preface. These Epistles, which were written by St. John, when in his exile at Patmos, are the last words of Christ to the Churches ; and, as such, they are weighty, and worthy of serious consideration by all classes of professing Christians. "With the exception of the able Commentary on the Epistles to the Seven Churches, written by Archbishop Trench, there is scarcely any other in which . the subject-matter of these Messages is treated critically and exegetically. There is a popular Commentary by the present Dean of Wells, Dr. Plumptre, which, while it contains much that is valuable and instructive, loses considerably in its claim to acceptance on account of the author contending for an ear lier date for the Apocalypse than that commonly assigned, and thereby occasioning no little obscurity and confusion in the interpretation. In the exposition now offered, it would be hardly possible for me to claim to be an independent worker, as I have availed myself of any materials within my reach by which the work might be rendered more full, and the interpretation more clear and explicit ; still I venture to hope that there will be found a considerable amount of expository matter, the entire of which, if not absolutely original in its conception, may claim to be new at least in method and illustration. The Greek Text is that of Bishop Wordsworth's Greek Testament, a book which embodies the most elaborate col lation of the best MSS., the results of the most recent Recen sions,, and a careful and judicious selection from the various Readings, making the Text to approximate as closely as it is possible to perfection. And in referring to the Greek text of Preface. ix that elaborate work, I may venture to add that the appended notes are also of the highest value, marked as they are with profound erudition and wide patristic research, while in every page a fragrance of fervent piety is diffused, which is redolent of heaven. The Translation is as close as it is allowable for the Greek idiom to warrant, so as strictly to preserve the correct meaning of the original. The Revised New Testament has, in most cases, been adhered to as being generally exact ; but where the Greek Text required a different rendering, there has been no hesitation in taking an independent course. The explanatory remarks on each verse are such as have suggested themselves as the obvious interpretation, by com paring Scripture with Scripture, irrespective of any claims of authority, or any desire to follow implicitly the footsteps of those who have preceded me in the same path. If I have ventured to differ from others, it is in no pre sumptuous or self-confident spirit ; for in handling the Word of God, one must proceed calmly and carefully, and, by prayerful guidance, endeavour to ascertain what is really intended by its Divine Author. Except at the beginnning of the Message to each Church, I have not entered, to any great extent, into historical matter, the chief place being given to the systematic interpretation of each verse, not only in its general scope, but in its practical bearings ; and when subjects of controversy or dogmatic theology have presented themselves, as, for example, " the beginning of the Creation of God," as applied to Christ, "the second death," the "white raiment," the worthiness of the faithful of Sardis, the power X Preface. of the keys, " the New Jerusalem," the reigning with Christ in His kingdom, I have carefully avoided all novel or un authorized speculations, and have endeavoured to give such expositions as are, in my own opinion, warranted by the general teaching of God's word, and are in harmony with the Creeds and Articles of the Church. On the subject of unfulfilled prophecy, which has been but slightly alluded to in one or two instances, I have always felt that extreme caution is necessary, and that we have no right to dogmatize, or speculate, in treating of the mysteries of the Seven Sealed Book, which is in the hands of Christ ; yet, at the same time, we are not forbidden to notice — on the contrary, we are rather justified in observing — the landmarks laid down for our guidance, and we are directed to shape our course accordingly, so that we may be like men that wait for their Lord's return, and have the blessing of those servants whom, when He cometh. He shall find watching (Luke xii. 37). The following works I have consulted, and have derived from them important aid, for which I cannot but express my obligations : — Archbishop Trench, Epistles to the Seven Churches ; Bishop Wordsworth, Greek Testament with Notes ; Dr. , Tristram's Seven Golden Candlesticks, a work which is most valuable in treating the subject from a historic point of view; Epistles to the Seven Churches, by Dr. Plumptre, Dean of Wells ; Bampton Lectures, by Canon Liddon ; Meyer, amongst German writers, I am specially indebted to ; and the Gnomon of the New Testament, by Bengel. Much valu able help has also been obtained from Stier, Words of the Preface. xi Risen Saviour ; Bishop Lightfoot's Churches of the Lycus, and the Ante-Nicene Christian Library, published by Messrs. T. and T. Clark, Edinburgh. Here I must not omit to express my heartfelt thanks to my friend and fellow-labourer in the same diocese, the Rev. James Treanor, M.A., Rector of Ballinrobe, who has ren dered me valuable assistance in correcting the proof sheets of this work when passing through the press, and who has also given me the benefit of his kind suggestions. I do not expect that freedom from error has in all things been attained in a work that has been written amid the necessary calls of public duty, and the distracting influence of numerous cares ; but I have employed all my endeavour so as to prevent any passage, or subject connected therewith, escaping my notice, without offering what I believed a just and fair interpretation of it. We treasure our Lord's Sermon on the Mount as containing the true ethical precepts of His kingdom ; not less so should we hold in estimation thes,e messages to the Churches, as the last words of the Risen Saviour coming from heaven to men ; and, when we hear these Divine utterances, we should feel that they are the voice of Him who has proclaimed Himself as " the Resur rection and the Life," and who will not again speak until His redeemed Church shall hail His Second Advent, and say — " Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord." If Churches and individuals can only see themselves repre sented in some of the pictures of these Apocalyptic Churches portrayed by the hand of Him " unto whom all hearts are open," and learn the lessons intended to be conveyed by xii Preface. the Messages which proceeded from the Saviour's lips through His inspired servant, then much benefit and bless ing might be expected to follow. If lessons of patience under suffering, firmness under persecution, faithfulness in times of temptation, zeal for God in our Christian profes sion, and a growing attachment to Christ amid all the changes and chances of life — if these lessons are acquired, and enforced, by whatever exposition these pages may con tain, no greater object could be desired ; nor could any higher reward be conferred upon the writer, to whom the investigation of this department of Sacred Truth has been a labour of love, and the time occupied in its study " a time of refreshing." Moylough Rectory, February, 1884. CONTENTS. PAGE Introduction xv-xlviii The Seven Churches. — Their Position. — 'Why Seven? — The Design of the Messages. — Schemes of Interpretation. — The 'Writer of the Messages. — Their Authenticity and Genuineness. — Internal Evi dence. — Why i,pvlov is used in the Revelation instead of d^iu/ds. — Who are the Angels of the Churches ? — The Date of the Apo calypse. — Classes of Interpreters. — Praeterists, Historical and Futurists. — By -whom the Churches -were planted. — Character of the Apostle. — Christ Himself the Author of the Revelation — St. John the Amanuensis. THE MESSAGES TO THE CHURCHES. Rev. i. 1-8. Title. — Inscription.— Salutation, and Doxo logy 1-44 General Observations. — Witness-bearing to Christ. — Blessing attached to the Study of the Revelation, — Style of St. John's Address. — Meaning of term ' ' Asia. " — Salutation, Greek and Hebrew in form. — Title 6 Siv. — The Seven Spirits before the Throne. — Names of Christ. — Proof of an Atonement. — Doxology ascribing Glory and Dominion to Christ. — The Second Advent. — The Alpha and fi. — Almighty to Save. Rev. i. 9-20. Divine Commission AND Vision . . .45-110 St. John identifies himself -with Suffering Church. — Became a dweller in Patmos. — Commission to write the Messages, and send them to the Churches, received hy him on the Lord's Day. — Sublime Vision. — Seven Golden Candlesticlis separated from each other. — ¦ One like the Son of Man in the midst of them. — Description of His Appearance. — Clothed in a Royal or Priestly Garment.— Hold ing Seven Stars in His Right Hand. — His Feet like to xa^KoXi^di/o!! — Derivation of Word.^A sharp two-edged Sword out of His Mouth. —His Countenance like the Sun in his strength. — Effect of the Vision upon the Apostle. — How Restored to Consciousness. — Christ proclaiming Himself as the First, and the Last, and the Living One. — Holding Keys of Death and Hades. — Explanation ofthe Mystery ofthe Seven Stars and the Seven Candlesticks. I. Message to the, Church of Ephesus .... 1 11-180 Rev. ii. 1-7. Ephesus in its Pagan Condition. — The Introduction of Christianity there by St. Paul. — The Attribute of Christ, 6 Kparuv. — The Praise given to the Church. — The Censure. — "Leaving first Love." — The Threatening. — Deeds of the Nicolaitans. — Promise to the Victor—' ' Eating of the Tree of Life. " xiv Contents. PAGE II. Message to the Church of Smyrna .... 181-222 Rev. ii. 8-1 1. Smyrna, its Position and Circumstances. — Polycarp con sidered to be the "Angel."— Persecutions.— The Title, "The First and the Last."— A Suffering Church.— Meaning of term "Jews" in this Epistle.—" Synagogue of Satan."— " Devil cast ing some into Prison." — Ten Days' Tribulation.— Promise to him who Overcame: "Not hurt of Second Death "—Meaning of Expression. III. Message to the Church of Pergamum . . . 223-254 Rev. ii. 12-17. Historical Sketch.— Title Christ here Adopts.— Meaning of "Sharp Sword with Two Edges."— Satan's Seat.— Antipas. — Balaamites ; are they the same as Nicolaitans?^— Threatening.— Call to Repentance. — Promise to Victor.— Hidden Manna. — 'White Stone and New Name. IV. Message to the Church of Thyatira . . . 255-292 Rev. ii. 18-29. Thyatira, connection of with Macedonia. — Lydia. — Worship of Apollo. — Praise given to the Church. — " That Woman Jezebel," or, " Thy Wife Jezebel " ? — Her Wickedness in Seducing the Members ofthe Church. — Profligacy and Idol Meats.— Punish ment of herself and her Confederates. — " Depths of Satan." — Promise to him who should Overcome. — Power over the Nations. —The Gift of "the Morning Star." V. Message to the Church of Sardis .... 293-332 Rev. iii. 1-6. Sketch of its History. — Worship of Cybele. — Christ's Title : He that hath the Seven Spirits of God and the Seven Stars. . — Nominal Christians — Call to 'Watchfulness and Activity. — First Principles and Repentance. — Threatening. — Sudden Visitation. —A Faithful Few. — Promise. — Clothed in White Raiment. — Name in 600k of Life. — Acknowledged in Heaven. VI. Message to the Church of Philadelphia. . . 333-386 Rev. iii. 7-13. Philadelphia, now Allah Shehr, City of God. — Gibbon's Testimony. — " He who hath the Key of David."— The "Open Door," and "Little Strength." — Professing Jews worshipping at feet of Christians. — Precious Promises. — Safe-keeping in Times of Tribulation. — A Pillar in Temple of God. — Name of My God. — New Jerusalem. — New Name. VII. Message to the Church of Laodicea . . . 387-466 Rev. iii. 14-22. Laodicea, when, and by whom built. — Wealthy In habitants.— " Epistle from Laodicea" (Col. iv. 15, 16). The Amen. — The Witness. — " Beginning of Creation of God." — Neither Cold nor Hot : Lukewarm.— Rejection by Christ.— Self- Satisfaction ; Ignorance of Spiritual Poverty. — Gold, White Raiment, Eyesalve offered.— Rebuke and Chastisement : latter not Penal but Purifying ; not mark of God's Wrath, but of Mercy and Salvation. — Christ standing at Door Knocking ; Promise to him who should Open. — The Crowning promise to the Victor here-^Sitting with Christ on His Throne in His Kingdom. Index 467 INTRODUCTION. The Seven Churches of Asia Minor, to which our blessed Lord sent messages by His servant, St. John, were situated in the western portion of that country, not far remote from the shores of the .^gean Sea. They lay in a group chiefly in the provinces of Lydia and Ionia, which two divisions embraced what are called Proconsular Asia. In this limited signification, we find the term, " Asia," so used in the Acts of the Apostles, as, for example, when Demetrius told his fellow craftsmen that St. Paul had persuaded and turned away much people, not alone at Ephesus, but almost through out all Asia (Acts xix. 26). The entire district was not more than one hundred miles square ; and, besides the Seven Churches to which Epistles were written, there were other Churches of no less importance included within these re stricted limits. There were, on the banks of the river Meander, three cities. Magnesia, Hierapolis, and Colossm, and < a fourth, Tralles, a little to the north of that river, in all > of which there were flourishing Christian Churches when St. s John wrote ; but these are unnoticed in the Apocalyptic " Vision." There must have been a special design in this. The Revelation is a book of symbol. While it is the last book of prophecy — the only prophetic book, properly so called, of the New Testament — its prophecies are unfolded in a series of visions, a kind of prophetic tableau, successively xvi Introduction. exhibiting the dispensations of God's providence to His Church, from the early days of Christianity until the Second Advent and the final Judgment. Just as all the progressive stages of the earth's history, before man's creation, were unfolded before the eye of the Hebrew prophet and lawgiver, until, in the six days' work, the entire series had been fully brought to view ; ^ so here, in the vision of the Apocalypse, symbolic representations of events which were to happen were made to pass before the eye of the Apostle until, like some dissolving view, the Church's long night of sorrow melted away into the light of heaven. The typical number, seven, is employed as the symbol of perfection, or completeness, ^ and in this sense it frequently occurs in the Apocalypse — denoting that these messages sent I to the Seven Churches were for all Churches throughout the world, and for all time. In accordance with this view, it has been noticed by some of the early Christian writers that I St. Paul wrote Epistles to Seven Gentile Churches, because what he wrote to them he wrote to all ; * and we are there fore no more warranted in appropriating the consolations, and hopes, the warnings and rebukes, addressed to the Asiatic Churches, as solely for their own edification and improvement, than we are in confining St. Paul's writings to the Churches of the age when he wrote. The Churches of Asia Minor are clearly representative. They are types of the Universal Church in its varied phases of spiritual life, and are designed so to be until that day when her absent Lord shall return, and when His people shall, out of every nation, and kindred, and tribe, stand in His presence, one glorious Church, " with out spot, or blemish, or any such thing." 1 Kurtz, Bibel und Astronomie. • Bahl-, Symbolik des Mos. Cult, vol. i. p. 129. ' Cyprian, De Exhort. Martyr., c. 11. Introduction. ¦ xvii Schemes of Interpretation. Some entertain the notion that, while these Churches are representative, they are so not only as descriptive of the spiritual condition of the Church of every age, but also as con taining the outline of the various states through which the Church of Christ is to pass until the Second Advent of our Lord. Vitringa, thus expresses this view : " Omnino igitur existimo Spiritum S. sub typo et emblemate septem Eccle siarum Asiae, nobis mystice et prophetice voluisse depingere septem variantes status Ecclesiae Christianas, quibus successive conspiceretur usque ad adventum Domini, et omnium rerum finem," etc. This notion is utterly untenable. It has no sanction from antiquity, nor is it borne out by the condition of the Church as recorded in history, from the time of St. John to the present. Archbishop Trench thinks that, because certain Churches of the seven, of small importance, were taken into the number, while others of greater note were omitted, this was for the purpose of supplying types of the different phases the Church was to assume. But it can hardly be seriously supposed that the Church of Ephesus, as addressed . by our Lord, through the beloved disciple, could be a type of the Christian Church in the first or second century, or Smyrna, the representative of the succeeding age. The idea conveyed by the addresses to the Seven Churches is not pro- t gression. If anything is clearly seen, it is that they are all communicated with at the same time, and that the substance of the message — indeed the very introduction of the Speaker in each case — applies directly to the condition of each Church, , and is adapted specially to the circumstances under which the particular Church addressed was placed. " Where the literal interpretation will stand, the farthest from it is the worst." This is one of the rules of the judicious Hooker ; and when men look for a prophetic meaning in plain historic narrative, b xviii Introduction. they betray all the weakness of a vain imagination, that would be wise above what is written, and, Icarus-like, foolishly attempt to penetrate beyond the cloud which hides the dim and distant future from the eye of mortals. Vitringa sees, for example, the Church of Ephesus repre senting that period which extended from the Day of Pentecost to the persecution under Decius ; Smyrna, the period from Decius to Diocletian ; Pergamum, from Constantine to the close of the seventh century; Thyatira, the first half of the Middle Ages ; Sardis, the period from the twelfth century to the Reformation ; Philadelphia, the first century of the Reformation ; Laodicea, the Reformed Church at the time he was writing.^ There may be in this arrangement certain points of coin cidence between the assumed prophecy and the fulfilment ; but the application is unnatural, forced, and arbitrary ; and any one acquainted with Church history must be aware that there is no connexion between the alleged symbol and the thing signified. Nor does it appear that those who have thought that " the promises in the seven Epistles correspond to the unfolding of the kingdom of God, from its first beginnings on earth to its consummation in heaven," have been more fortunate in their scheme of interpretation. For example — to the faithful in Ephesus is promised " the tree of life in the Paradise of God " (Rev. ii. 7). This, we are told, corresponds to the tree of life in Eden, around which were placed cherubim and a flaming sword. To the faithful in Smyrna, " they shall not be hurt of the second death." This corresponds to what is written regarding the introduction of sin and death into the world. Then the promise made to Pergamum as to the "hidden manna" brings us to the journeying of Israel in the wilderness, and so on. To follow up such designed coincidences would only be perverting ' Lange, vol. ii. p. 472. Introduction. xix Scripture, and seeking for concord and harmony where there was neither aflinity nor cohesion — mistaking the foolish and vague fancies of men for the mind of the Spirit of God. Never should we be found taking such unwarrantable liberties in the matter of Scripture interpretation ; but rather like the wheels described in Ezekiel, "when the spirit went they went, and when the spirit stood they stood ; " so should we ever seek to be guided into all truth by Him who alone can make us wise unto salvation. The Writer of the Messages to the Churches. There is considerable difference of opinion amongst critics as to the writer of these Messages, and the time when they were sent to the several Churches. The Revelation is very unlike any of the other writings of St. John, so much so, that the genuineness and authenticity of the book have been questioned. Any one reading the Epistles and Gospel would find it hard to recognise the Revelation as the work of the same author, and yet there are certain marks, and finger posts, which make it clear - that they all came from the same source. In the Epistles and Gospel of St. John, the title, " Word," as applied to Christ is found, and this designation is not used by any of the other Apostles and Evangelists. We find this appellation in Rev. xix. 13. In the other writings of St. John, we are reminded of a conflict and a victory in the Christian life ; so in the Messages to the Seven Churches, this " overcoming " is the condition of, and qualifi cation for, the Christian's final glory, honour, and blessedness. The Divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ runs, like a silver thread, through all the writings of St. John, and imparts such an individuality of character, as distinguishes them from the writings of any other Apostle ; and this prominently appears in the section of the Revelation now under review. The Epistles to the Seven Churches were received, retained, XX Introduction. and acknowledged by the Churches of Proconsular Asia as having been written by St. John ; and if they had been the work of one who said he was an Apostle, and was not, they would have been rejected. Indeed, the very commendation which St. John gives to the Church of Ephesus for " trying them that said they were Apostles and were not," indicates clearly his own claim to Divine inspiration. There is a marked peculiarity in all St. John's writings in the affirmation he makes in regard to the accuracy of his testimony : " This is the disciple which testifieth of these things and wrote these things, and we know that his testimony is true" (John xxi. 24). See also Rev. i. 2, 3 ; John i. 14, 15 ; I John i. I, 2. The designation, " Lamb," and " Lamb of God," as applied to Christ, is specially characteristic of St. John, although he employs a different word in the Revelation from that which he makes use of in the Gospel, to express the title. I The word apviov is used twenty-nine times in the Revela tion to describe Christ as the Lamb, while in the Gospel of St. John it only once occurs, — but in a different application — (John xxi. 15), the word a/ivo? being invariably employed. Some have thought that this fact is at variance with St. John's having been the author of the Revelation. But they never seem to have inquired whether there was a design in » this change. 'Apviov is an appellation of tender emotion and endearment, and is just such a designation as the beloved disciple would haVe been likely to use in reference to Him whom he had seen " brought as a lamb to the slaughter," and upon whom he never could expend too great a wealth of love. Although the word is in a diminutive form, it had then lost its diminutive signification, and was well suited to convey the idea of Christ as the sacrificial Lamb in virtue of His death still sustaining to His people, in His glorified humanity, the most intimate and endearing relation as the Apostle and Introduction. xxi High Priest of their profession, and the exalted Head of His Church. We find apviov first applied to Christ in the Revelation in connexion with the seven-sealed roll which contained a prophetic detail of the Church's sufferings, from the period of the vision of Patmos to the world's close. In chap. xii. there is a description of t\xQ faithful Church, symbolized by the woman clothed with the sun ; and in chap, xvii., we read of the faithless Church under the figure of a woman seated on a scarlet-coloured beast {Orjpiov), so that there is a contrast presented, as Bishop Wordsworth observes, between the v Tropvrj Kai to drjpiov on the one side, and •q vvfir] Koi TO apviov on the other ; and to make the contrast more marked, the word chosen by St. John (apviov) is exactly adapted. To argue against St. John's authorship of the Revelation, because in the Gospel the designation, " Lamb," is a/j.vo'i, but in the former, apviov, would be to ignore the character and object of these books — the one dealing exclusively, except in the first three chapters, with prophecy and symbol, th'e other with historic narrative ; the one in reference to Christ now glorified on His throne, the other in regard to His humiliation and suffering here on earth. This change of expression, which is noticeable here, we find in other instances also. When in the Revelation St. John refers to the heavenly Jerusalem, he writes, 'lepova-aXrjfji ; while in the Gospel alluding to the earthly city it is 'lepoaoXvfia. In like manner ol 'lovSaioi in the Gospel designates the literal Jews, the bitter enemies of Christ, yet in the Revelation the term is used to denote the true followers of Christ (ii. 9 ; iii. 9). So that, although the Apocalypse differs in style and manner from the other writings of the Apostle, this may be accounted for by the difference of subject, and the mode of communica tion by vision, through which the things he afterwards com- xxii Introduction. mitted to writing, were made known to him. By symbol, he was instructed to depict the Church's condition and history, her perils and progress, her sorrows and joys, her trials and triumphs ; and while the world kingdoms were in the fore ground of the picture in formidable array against the Church, the full and final triumjA of Christ over every opposing power was the goal to which all his prophetic disclosures tended. There is no other Book of Scripture like this ; and we may- feel assured that no lesser inspiration than that of the Divine Spirit could have enabled the Apostle to place on record the marvellous things contained in it, so far beyond what human foresight could disclose. In parts of Isaiah, Daniel, and Zechariah, there are some points resembling the Revelation ; but nothing equal to it in portraying the chequered history of the Church in the latter days, at the end of which we are taught to expect the complete overthrow of the world power and the establishment of Christ's kingdom — that grand consummation evincing to the universe "the manifold wisdom of God." That St. John wrote the Revelation was acknowledged universally until the third century, when certain views re specting the millennium having been founded on passages contained in it, by those who were called Chiliasts, to get rid of the arguments put forward by these men, their opponents went so far as to deny the authenticity of the Book ; after wards, however, it regained its ancient authority, and has never since been questioned as to the place it occupies in the Sacred Canon. Who are Meant by the Angels of the Seven Churches .' (Rev. i. 20). This question is one of considerable difficulty, and has received a variety of answers. The cause of the difficulty has arisen from the term, "Angels," being nowhere else in the New Testament applied to designate the Heads of Churches. Introduction. xxiii The words, " bishops " and " elders," are frequently used in the Pastoral Epistles as descriptive of those who had the over sight of Churches ; but the word, " Angel," in this connexion is a novelty ; hence, there are writers who have denied its applicability to presidents, or overseers of Churches, altogether, and who have adhered to the plain and obvious interpretation of the term, as denoting a heavenly Angel. Bishop Lightfoot considers the stars as symbolic of the heavenly representa tives ; the lamps, the earthly realization, the outward embodi ment of the Churches. In this view the Angels are regarded as celestial guardians, just as guardian angels are supposed to be set apart for the bodily protection of individuals. Bishop Lightfoot further adds : " Whatever may be the exact con ception, the Angel is identified with, and made responsible for, the Church, to a degree wholly unsuited to any human officer." Against this view there are insuperable difficulties. The idea of Churches having " guardian angels " is not less a novelty than the term, "Angel," being used in the sense of bishop. It is true that in i Cor. xi. lo, we read of Angels being present in the worshipping assemblies of God's people ; and the argument used by St. Paul for women covering their heads in the Church, thereby exhibiting reverence, submission, and modesty, is "because of the Angels," who are present intermingling in the worship of God, and who veil their faces, in token of their reverence, and are most pleased when they perceive in their fellow-worshippers whatever most conduces to peace, harmony, and edification. We read, too, that Angels are "ministering spirits, sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation " ; and in Matt, xviii. ID, where our Lord is mentioned as speaking of children, and where He tells His disciples not to despise them, however weak and helpless they may appear to be; the reason is, because they have a dignity and an immortality which will outlive the stars of heaven, and which dignity and immortality xxiv Introduction. are proved by the fact that " in heaven their angels do always behold the face of My Father which is in heaven." The words, " their angels " would seem to favour the notion of guardian angels set apart to keep watch and ward over the young; and the Psalmist says: "The angel of the Lord en- campeth round about them that fear Him," — showing that not merely to children, but also to all, irrespective of age or sex, who fear the Lord, the same privilege of bodily protection - and help in difficulty is afforded But with all these passages, the persons addressed as Angels in the Messages to the Seven Churches have nothing whatever to do. The Angels I of the different Churches were to be written to ; they were, 1 some of them, reproved and rebuked, while others were ' approved and praised. This could not apply to heavenly Angels. It could not be said of one of those bright and holy beings who stand before the throne of God, "Nevertheless, I have somewhat against thee, because thou hast left thy first love " ; or, " I know thy works that thou art neither cold nor hot"; or, if the reading of Rev. ii. 20, t^i/ '^vvalKo, crov Te^a/SeX, be correct, which Bishops Wordsworth and Lightfoot consider it to be, there would be a gross incongruity in identifying the Angel of the Church of Thyatira with one of those heavenly spirits, who "neither marry nor are given in marriage." We may, therefore, dismiss this view of the term. Angel, in Rev. i. 20, as utterly unsupported, as in applicable to the requirements of the case, and too fanciful for a moment to be entertained. Whatever meaning we may attach to the word, it must be understood as designating some human being who held a distinguished place at the head of each of the Churches, and who was its superintendent, and was responsible for its spiritual condition. The person styled " Angel," could not have been an Apostle, as St. John was then the last surviving Apostle of the Twelve. He must, therefore, have been the president, Introduction. xxv chief pastor, or head of the Church to which the message was sent; and it was intended that, through him, the subject matter communicated should be conveyed to the particular Church in which he was an overseer. He is closely identified with it; so much so, that it is difficult to decide, in many instances, whether the message is sent directly to himself, or through him to it. If there is praise or blame, the Angel receives either the one or the other, just in proportion as the Church deserves it. Was the Angel then the Bishop of the Church addressed ? and, if so, why was not the title. Bishop, used instead of the peculiar designation of Angel .¦" Timothy had been ordained the first Bishop of Ephesus by St. Paul, many years before the addresses to the Seven Churches were sent, and if he was then at Ephesus, it is re markable that the word " Angel," should have been used to denote his episcopal office. It does not, however, appear that, in the days of the Apostles, or for some time afterwards, the name bishop, as denoting an order superior to that of presbyter, was in common use, as the words presbyter and bishop, were interchangeable. Even St. Peter calls himself an elder ; and St. Paul, in addressing the elders of Ephesus, calls them all by this name ; and at the same time speaks of them as overseers {iiriaKoirowi) ; and on his first Apostolic journey in company with Barnabas, we are told, "they ordained them elders in every Church." These seem to have occupied in the Christian Church :a similar position to that which the priests did in the Jewish synagogue ; and as in Apostolic times the synagogue was more or less frequented by Christian pro fessors, the model of the Christian Church was adopted from and planned according to the organization of the synagogue. The council which met at Jerusalem was composed of presbyters, from the number of whom St. James was elected as president ; and though Apostles were there, presbyters were associated with them in confirming the decrees of that council. xxvi Introduction. We might then expect that the term " presbyter," would be that by which the president of each of the Seven Churches should have been designated. It has been observed that the name Bishop was indifferently used for presbyter ; but it had not come sufiiciently into recognition while the Apostles lived. Bishop Lightfoot considers the title Bishop as having been first used by Gentile Churches, and that it was suggested by and borrowed from the directors of religious and social clubs among the heathen.^ He adduces the commissioners appointed by the Greeks to regulate a new colony, as having been designated eiria-Korroi, and the Roman magistrates who regulated the sale of provisions, he tells us, also adopted the same title. But in Apostolic times, when St. Paul addresses, epistles or salutations to the bishops and deacons, while he makes no mention of presbyters, we must clearly infer that the terms bishop and presbyter were identical. For half a century from the date of the destruction of Jerusalem, during which there is a perfect blank in ecclesi astical history, we have no sure warrant for ascertaining what were the designations used in the Christian ministry. So long as Apostles lived, the name "Apostles," was the distinctive title ; but when they passed away, we may suppose that, in the organization of the different Churches, there were men appointed, who, although they did not pretend to per form the extraordinary functions of the Apostles, in working miracles, or lay claim to possess the gift of tongues, yet were set apart for the supervision and effective adminis tration of the affairs of the Churches. St. Ignatius mentions the three orders of bishops, presbyters and deacons, in his Epistle to Polycarp. " Give heed to the bishop, that God also may give heed to you. I am devoted to those who are obedient to the bishop, to presbyters, to deacons " (tcG eTna-KOTTO), irpea^vripoi';, BiaKovois) ; and by this Apostolic ' Bishop Lightfoot, on Phil., p. 95. Introduction. xxvii Father, the bishop is always spoken of as the chief officer of the Church. Now the Epistle to Polycarp was written in the beginning of the second century, as Ignatius suffered mar tyrdom in the ninth year of Trajan's reign, A.D. 107, so that the title bishop had then been recognised as distinct from that of presbyter. We may believe that those who were set apart by Apostles for the supervision of special communities of. Christians, where many Churches were grouped together — such as Ignatius for Antioch, Polycarp for Smyrna, and Clement for Rome — were, in virtue of their office, in a higher position than the presbyters of individual Churches. The letter of Clement of Rome shows this : "The Apostles having appointed elders in every Church, and foreseeing that disputes would arise afterwards, added a codicil, that if they should fall asleep, other approved men should succeed to their office."^ In the Asiatic Church, we may suppose that during the thirty years from the overthrow of Jerusalem to the end of the first century, the organization of these Churches was carried out by St. John. When Jerusalem was destroyed, and the disciples of our Lord scattered abroad, Asia Minor afforded a refuge where they escaped, in some degree, the persecution which sorely tried the Christians in other parts of the Roman empire. Christianity was not new to the people of Proconsular Asia, for there St. Philip had already preached the gospel, and there also St. Andrew had, for a protracted period, laboured. St. Paul and St. Barnabas had in previous times planted many Christian Churches in that country, the former having remained for three years at Ephesus. If after the death of St. James, when the disciples met to appoint a successor, and actually did select Symeon, as Eusebius mentions, there was an apportionment of districts for mis sionary effort, we may conclude that the portion assigned to St. John was Asia Minor, and that, as an Apostle, he was to 1 Clem. Rom., § 44, quoted by Bishop Lightfoot, Comm. on Phil, p. 203. xxviii Introduction. exercise authority and jurisdiction over the Churches in that locality to the end of his life. When he went to Ephesus, if Timothy was already there, having been appointed by St. Paul as bishop, this title does not appear to have carried with it any meaning more than that of chief presbyter, with power to ordain, to appoint, or depose elders. In all likelihood, " parishes " had not been regularly mapped out, but Churches here and there had been col lected and grouped, and presbyters placed in charge of them. Now by what name was such a Church officer as Timothy to be known ? He was not an Apostle, although selected to fill the post of honour and of duty which an Apostle had occupied. He was more than an ordinary presbyter, for the functions of his office were such as a mere presbyter could not discharge. The word "Angel" might fitly express the dignity and importance of the office assigned to him, who held that intermediate position between an Apostle on the one hand, and an ordinary presbyter on the other ; and more especially as the period during which this term was applied was a transitional one, — the extraordinary dignity of Apostle con ferred directly by Christ passing away with St. John, and the ordinary office of overseer, or bishop, being about to take its place. It is clear that, in the beginning of the second century, the three orders of bishop, presbyter, and deacon, were recognised, defined, and confirmed. This is shown from the writings of Ignatius already referred to, who speaks of himself as bishop of Antioch, and who expressly specifies the three orders of bishop, presbyter, and deacon.^ Clemens of Alexandria states that St. John went about from city to city in Asia Minor, his purpose being "in some places to establish bishops, in others to consolidate whole Churches, in others again to appoint to the clerical office some one of ' Ignat., Epist. to Polyc, 6. Introduction, xxix those who had been signified by the Spirit." ^ Of Polycarp, Bishop of Smyrna, Irenaeus, his pupil, says, " he had not only been instructed by Apostles, and had conversed with many who had seen Christ, but had also been established by Apostles in Asia, as bishop in the Church at Smyrna," ^ In the Circular Epistle of the Church of Smyrna, relating to the Martyrdom of Polycarp, that faithful martyr is styled "a truly Apostolic and prophetic teacher, and the Bishop of the Catholic Church which is at Smyrna." * We find then that the term, "Angel," was only of tem porary application, and it suited the period of transition ' between the last of the Apostles and the development of the episcopal oflfice. It was not unknown to the Churches as having been applied to those who spoke in former times in the name of the Lord, such as Malachi, who is called " My Angel, or messenger " ; John the Baptist, who is spoken of by the same figure (Mal. iii. i), and the Jewish priests (Mal. ii. 7). The expression was apposite, however singular it may have appeared. As Dean Plumptre says, " It testified that the servants of God who had been called to this special office were to lead on earth an angel's life ; that they, both in the liturgical and the ministerial aspects of their work, were to be as those who, in both senses, were ministering spirits in heaven (Heb. i. 14). It helped also — and this may well have commended it — to bring the language of the Revelation into 1 harmony with that of the great Apocalyptic work of the Old 1 Testament, the prophecy of Daniel. On the other hand, we need not wonder that it did not take a prominent place in the vocabulary of the Church. The old associations of the word were too dominant, the difficulty of distinguishing the newi from the old too great, to allow of its being generally accepted. It was enough that it answered, as now, a special purpose." * ' ' Quis Div. Salv. f 42, p. 959. ' Iren., iii. 3, 4. 8 Epist. of Ch. of Smyrna, sec. l6. * Dean Plumptre, Ep. to Seven Ch., p. 48. xxx Introduction. The Date of the Apocalypse. The traditional view as regards the date of the Apocalypse has been recently set aside by some, and a much earlier date assigned to it. But it is hardly safe, unless upon sufficient authority, to disturb those long-established bases upon which the genuineness and authenticity of the books of Scripture rest. The effect is to loosen the bond which unites us to them, to engender doubt, and to lead men to say : If there is uncertainty in such a plain matter as the date of author ship, what reliance can be placed in results which have been reached in matters of difficulty, where the data have been obscure or imperfect t German investigation has frequently outstepped the bounds of legitimate criticism ; and by vain speculation, men of the nineteenth century pretend to be better informed as regards the time and place of the writing of a book of Holy Scripture than the Apostolic Fathers, and the other eminent theologians who lived in the early days of Christianity. Now as regards the time when the Revelation was written, it is contended that it was in the reign of Nero, A.D. 54-68, and that the banishment of St. John was contem poraneous with the martyrdom of St. Peter and St. Paul ; but has it never occurred to those who advocate an early date for the Revelation, that it could hardly be supposed Nero would put two Apostles to death, and permit a third to end his days in exile.? Indeed, such a punishment as exile to Patmos was unknown in the time of Nero, nor is there any evidence to show that, except at Rome, any Christian suffered death during his reign. St. Irenffius, who was a disciple of Polycarp, the actual disciple of St. John, affirms— and there is no reason to doubt his testimony — that the Apocalypse "was seen not so long ago, but almost in our generation, towards the close of the Introduction. xxxi reign of Domitian " •} but we are told by Lutzelberger, Renan, , Baur, and others, that no value can be attached to any state ment of Irenaeus, because he held the tradition that Christ was fifty years old, and he asserted, on the authority of Papias, that our blessed Lord uttered a strange prediction, to the effect that "days shall come in which vines shall grow, of which each shall have ten thousand shoots," etc. When Irenaeus, therefore, stated that St. John wrote the Apocalypse towards the end of the reign of Domitian, this statement is as destitute of historic authority as the other assertions are of truth, and that it goes for nothing. This inference, however, is scarcely justified ; for his testimony as to the time of St. John's writing the Apocalypse is in regard to a matter of fact, while the other points to which exception has been taken are only matters of hearsay or tradition. An attempt has been made to explain away the evidence of Irenaeus, by making the word " Domitian " identical with Domitius Nero j but Tertullian, in writing on the same point, distinguishes clearly between Nero and Domitian, where he says, " Nero was the first Emperor who used the sword against the Church, and the next who imitated him was Domitian."^ This distinction clearly shows that there was no such con fusion of names as is alleged, and that it was therefore not Nero, who died A.D. 68, but Domitian, who died A.D. 96, that St. Irenaeus alluded to. But there is other testimony to the fact besides that of Irenaeus. Clemens of Alexandria, who was contemporary with Irenaeus, and who occupied a distinguished place in the Church towards the close of the second century, does not name the Emperor, it is true, by whom St. John was banished, but he says that, " after the death of the tyrant, John went from the island of Patmos to Ephesus " ; and he adds that "John remained with the elders of Asia to the time of ' Iren , adv. Har. v., 30, 3. ^ Tertull., Apol., i, 6. xxxii Introduction. Trajan."! Xhg tyrant alluded to here is obviously Domitian, whose cruelty was in no degree less than that of Nero ; and the allusion to St. John continuing to live through Nerva's reign to the times of Trajan, is a strong presump tion that it was not in the reign of Nero he was exiled to Patmos, but in that of the second persecutor of the Church, who, according to Tertullian, imitated Nero, namely Domitian. By the time Domitian died, A.D. 96, we are told St. John would have been " too old to write the fiery pages of the Apocalypse." We are not to infer that it was after the death of the tyrant, but during St. John's exile in Patmos, in Domitian's lifetime, he wrote the Apocalypse. Besides, if his life was prolonged until the times of Trajan, we may suppose that, like Moses who had the vision of God, he who leant upon the Saviour's bosom may have been similarly sustained, so that " his eye was not dim, nor his natural force abated." Trajan came to the throne in A.D. 98, and he reigned nineteen years. We have further evidence from Victorinus, who suffered martyrdom, A.D. 303, and who not only affirms that St. John was in Patmos when " he saw the Apocalypse," but was banished there by Domitian, to work in the mines, and that after the assassination of the tyrant, he was released.^ To this testimony may also be added that of Eusebius and St. Jerome, both of whom state that it was in the fourteenth year of the reign of Domitian, A.D. 95, when, in the isle of Patmos, through the persecution of Domitian, St. John wrote the Apocalypse. ^ Surely in the face of this external evidence it is impossible to believe that an earlier date than the close of the first century could be assigned to the Revelation. But it is said that there is internal evidence which must go a long way ' Clem. Alex., apud Euseb., iii. 23. » Victor., in Apocal., x. 11. ' Jerome, Dt Vir. Illust., 9. Euseb., Chron. and H. E., iii. 18. Introduction. xxxiii to demand an earlier date, and in fact make it absolutely necessary. The style of the Apocalypse is so poor, and the structure of the sentences in many cases so defective, that, when compared with the Gospel, it could scarcely be recog nised as having been written by the same individual. The gospel shows an acquaintance with Hellenistic Greek, of which the Revelation gives not the faintest trace. How then, it is asked, if the Apocalypse was written in A.D. 95, could the writer in five years at most have made such progress in the acquisition of style and in the perfection of language, as to make the one book almost a contrast to the other ? But do the facts justify the inference here drawn ? It is admitted that the Gospel of St. John shows poverty of language and - style in many respects as great as the Apocalypse. Tholuck, than whom no scholar was more competent to decide, alludes to the use of certain particles which are constantly repeated in St. John's Gospel, and he also speaks of barbarisms and solecisms, in various places ; so that St. John is not to be regarded as such a practised and perfect writer, even when he wrote the Gospel ; and, this being so, there would be no difficulty in his acquiring, in a very few years, such an im provement in style as the Gospel evinces when compared with the Apocalypse, instead of our supposing him to have spent twenty or thirty years in endeavouring to attain it. Even in the writings of St. Paul, the most highly educated and gifted of the Apostles, there are many deviations from pure classic style. To fix the period of the Apocalypse in the time of Nero, or Galba, the conspirator, who hurled Nero from his throne, would be attended with insuperable difficulties. (i) As has been already shown, it would be contrary to the voice of the early Apostolic Fathers, some of whom con versed with St. John, and the latest of whom were separated from the Apostle by only one generation, and who must, xxxiv Introduction. therefore, have been in a better position to know the fact than we who are removed from him by 1800 years. (2) If banished in the reign of Nero, he must then have been a resident in Rome ; but there is no evidence to show that he was ever in Rome, and the Neronian persecution of Christians was altogether confined to those who were in the city. Had St. John been there, most probably he never would have seen Patmos, but must have endured the same kind of martyrdom which the other followers of Christ suffered at the hands of the tyrant Nero. There can be no doubt that St. John was residing at Ephesus for some considerable time, before " he became a dweller " in Patmos ; but when he went to that city, there is no certain evidence. Probably he did not go to Ephesus until after St. Paul's martyrdom, which took place in either A.D. 6"] {Euseb), or 68 (Jerome). He was not there when St. Paul summoned the elders of Ephesus to meet him at Miletus ; nor have we any proof that he was there when St. Paul wrote his Epistle to the Ephesians, or his two Epistles to Timothy, the second of which was written immediately before his death. The Jewish war broke out about that time, and if St. John was then in Jerusalem, he may have gone to Asia Minor, especially as dangerous heresies prevailed there, and the presence of an Apostle was needful in order to counteract them and preserve purity of doctrine. Indeed, Jerome says, that owing to those heresies, St. John was urged by all the Asiatic bishops and deputations from many Churches to write respecting the Divinity of the Saviour.^ That he was in Asia Minor before being sent to Patmos is clear from the fact that those Fathers who have referred to his exile, speak of his returning to Ephesus. Irenaeus for example says : " After the death of Domitian he returned from Patmos to Ephesus, where he lived to the reign of 1 Hieron., Prafat. in Matth. Introduction, xxxv Trajan, and died at Ephesus in the sixty-eighth year after our Lord's Crucifixion." i So also Jerome : " When Domi tian was slain and his decrees rescinded by the Senate, on account of his cruelty, John returned to Ephesus in the reign of Nerva." ^ Eusebius, following Irenaeus, says that " the Apocalyptic vision was given to John at the end of the reign of Domitian;"^ and Tertullian speaks of the Apostle having been cast into a vessel of boiling oil, by command of Domitian, and when taken out miraculously unhurt, having been banished to Patmos.* If then St. John did not go to Ephesus until after the martyrdom of St. Paul, and if he was in Ephesus before being sent to Patmos, as the statements of Irenaeus, Jerome, and others imply, it is obvious he could have neither been banished to that island, nor have written the Apocalypse, during the reign of Nero. (3) But how can the statement of Irenaeus, that, "when a boy (about A.D. 150), he had heard from the mouth of Polycarp, Bishop of Smyrna, and many other elders, many memorable things about John, the Lord's disciple, who, as a successor to St. Paul, lived in Ephesus, wrote the Revelation, and died at a great age in the reign of Trajan "^ — be recon ciled with St. John's banishment to Patmos in the reign of Claudius, Nero, or Galba ? (4) When St. Paul wrote his Epistle to the Ephesians, which was during his first imprisonment in Rome, A.D. 61-63, that Church is spoken of in terms of the highest praise, and the Apostle " thanks God for their faith in the Lord Jesus and love unto all the saints" (i. 15). He speaks of them as " raised up and made to sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus " — " built together for an habitation of God ' Iren., ii. 22, J. ^ Hieron., de Script Eccles., c. lo. 3 Euseb., Eccl. Hist., iii. 18. ¦* Tertul., Prascr. adv. Hcer., c. 36. ° Euseb., V. 20, 24. Iren., adv. Har., iii. 3 xxxvi Introdziction. through the spirit " (ii. 22) ; and it could hardly be supposed that, in the course of four or five years from that time, the Church at Ephesus should have sunk so low as it un doubtedly was when St. John wrote. Nemo repente turpis- simus applies to Churches as well as individuals. If St. John wrote the Apocalypse in the reign of Nero, how was it that the Church presented such a contrast to what it had been a few years previously.' This is wholly inexplicable. How can we account for the sudden departure from " first love " } Instead of the Church at Ephesus having "lost its first love," it was flourishing in the days of Nero, as Bishop Wordsworth well remarks, "in the first springtime of the gospel, which it had received from St. Paul." (5) The Seven Churches were, when St. John wrote, not newly formed Churches, but had been for years in existence ; they had become thoroughly organized and settled ; they had suffered trial, and some of them fierce persecution ; there had been at Pergamum one who is designated by the Lord Himself, " My faithful martyr" (Antipas), and who had nobly perished for the truth ; there were heresies prevailing in some of the Churches to which St. John wrote, and which had not been known in the time of St. Paul, such as the Nicolaitan heresy, called also the " doctrine of Balaam," and the perni cious teachings of the woman (or " thy wife ") Jezebel. Now if these Asiatic Churches were planted by St. Paul, some very , considerable time must have passed before they could have ' arrived at the state in which they were when St. John ad dressed them. We know that Timothy was presiding over the Church at Ephesus at the time that St. Paul was about to suffer martyrdom ; and how could St. John say then that he was "a companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ," for we do not find any record of his having at that time been in any way associated with Ephesus, at least there is no mention of him by St. Paul in that con- Introduction. xxxvii nection? We have no positive information as to the time when St. John left Jerusalem. No doubt he remained the twelve years, which tradition says Christ had told His disciples to stay in the Holy City after His ascension ;! and we may be assured he continued to dwell there until after the death of Mary, the mother of our Lord, which took place A.D. 48. We find SS. Peter, James and John, the Apostles of the Circumcision, associated together in Jerusalem, and present at the Council held there in A.D. 50 ; and as there is no record of St. John having left that city, he may have re mained there for some years afterwards. It is probable he was temporarily absent in A.D. 62, when St. James was martyred by the rulers of the Jews, who were exasperated because, a year previously, St. Paul had escaped from their hands. Had St. John been then in the city, it could scarcely be supposed he should have been spared, as the rage and fanaticism that had spent their force in slaying one Apostle would not have been withdrawn or withheld in the case of another. Possibly between that time and the martyrdom of St. Paul, he was preparing to leave Jerusalem for ever ; and the immediate necessity for his going to Asia Minor after St. Paul's death has already been shown. That St. John did reside at Ephesus we have positive evi dence furnished by Irenaeus (iii. 3, 4), Clemens Alexandrinus (Quis Div. Salv., c. 42), and Eusebius (H. E., iii. 31) ; but we have no possibility of ascertaining the circumstances under which, or the exact time when, he removed to that city. It has been said that the Apocalypse must have been written before the fall of Jerusalem, because in Rev. xi. i, the writer speaks of " a reed " having been given to him, with directions " to rise and measure the temple of God, and the altar, and them that worship therein." But in reply to this ob jection, the word, vaof, is never used, throughout the Epistles ' ApoUonius apud Euseb., H. E. V., 18. xxxviii Introduction. or in the Book of the Revelation, to denote the literal temple, tut it invariably applies to the Church of Christ (i Cor. iii. i6; vi. 19 ; 2 Cor. vi. 16 ; Eph. ii. 21) ; and as the measuring here applies to the worshippers, as well as the temple, it must be interpreted in a spiritual sense, as descriptive of that pre servation and protection which God has at all times bestowed on His Church, and the pledge of the perpetuity of which is contained in, " Lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the worid" (Matt, xxviii. 20). There is no more reason for holding that the literal temple was then standing when St. John wrote the passage in Rev. xi. i, than there is for believing that Jerusalem was standing when St. John wrote his Gospel, where he says (v. 2), " Now there is at Jerusalem, by the sheep-market, a pool," etc., the explanation of which statement is, that the pool remained after the city had been destroyed ; for it is allowed by those who fix an early date for the Apocalypse, that the Gospel was written at a late period, long after the destruction of Jerusalem. See Westcott, on St. John, p. 87 ; Early Days of Christianity, vol. ii. p. 189. Tertullian, alluding to the persecution of the Church at Pergamum, in which Antipas suffered, describes this per secution as having occurred during the time of Domitian ; so that the end of the reign of that sanguinary monarch may be accepted as the time when the Revelation was " seen," as an earlier date would not accord with the condition of things which prevailed in the Asiatic Churches when St. John wrote. " In these seven Epistles," says Wordsworth, " we see Churches settled with Angels, or Chief Pastors, at their head ; we see that some years have elapsed since they were planted ; that time has passed away in which they have been tried, and some have stood the trial, as Smyrna and Philadelphia ; that some of them have declined from their primitive standard, as Ephesus, under fear of persecution, or, through worldliness and lukewarmness, as Laodicea ; that others have a name Introduction. xxxix to live and are dead, as Sardis ; and that heresies have grown up amongst them, as at Thyatira ; and that they have been visited by forms of heretical pravity and moral libertinism, such as the doctrines and practice of the Nicolaitans and Judaizers, which were the scourges of the Asiatic Churches at that time." ^ Assuredly such a state of things as is here described could hardly find a place in a scheme that would connect the date of the Epistles to the Seven Churches with Nero's time ; and, but for the gaining of an object, interpreters would never have thought of adopting such a date. Three Classes of Interpreters. There are three classes of interpreters ; the Prceterists, who consider that all the Revelation has had its fulfilment, except ing, perhaps, the last four chapters ; the Historical, who regard the Revelation as a consecutive series of prophecies, the chief of which have been fulfilled, as shown by the testimony of history ; and the Futurists, who consider the entire book as prophecy yet to be fulfilled. The Prceterist looks upon all that the Apocalypse contains as having had its fulfilment in primitive times ; first, in the destruction of Jerusalem, and the subsequent dispersion of the Jewish race ; and secondly in the downfall of the Roman empire ; and hence the anxiety to fix an early date for the writing of this book. The interpreters of this class are generally confined to the Rationalistic School ; but their views are in direct contravention of the Fathers and the theological writers of the first six centuries, and utterly at variance with the whole course of Providence as developed in the history ofthe Church. The Praeterist view of the Apocalypse, is to regard it merely as "an inspired outline of contemporary history," and as referring to, and having had its fulfilment in, " events occurring in the sixth decade of the first century," which ' Bishop Wordsworth, On the Rev., p. 158. xl Introduction. corresponds to the last days of the reign of Nero. These events were made known, we are told, by symbols presented to the eye of St. John, after the opening of seals, the sound ing of trumpets, and the pouring out of vials. The thing signified was the overthrow of the Jewish nation, the triumphs of Christianity over the Pagan power of Rome. Nero was the antichrist in St. John's day, just as Antiochus Epiphanes had been his prototype in the time of the Maccabees; and the only coming of Christ which was announced in the Revelation, had its fulfilment when that political judgment was inflicted upon the Jews in A.D. 70, by Titus Vespasian, which resulted in the burning of the Temple, the destruction of the city, and the complete dis persion of the Jewish race. Some writers on prophecy who have adopted the Praeterist theory even allege that " the new heaven and the new earth " (Rev. xxi. i), are to be under stood as the happy state of the world after the destruction of Jerusalem, — seeming to forget the ten persecutions which began with Nero and ended with Diocletian. Now this may be New Testament exegesis, but it is, to say the least, sui generis. It yields but little deference to the voice of antiquity, to the teaching of the Church, and to the creeds and formularies of the Christian faith, which have been handed down from generation to generation as "forms of sound words " that we are to hold dear as life itself. Such interpretation of the Apocalypse savours some-what of the secularism of the last times, when men will not endure sound doctrine, when "they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." If, for example, we take 2 Thess. ii. 8, and apply the principle of interpretation adopted by the Praeterist to that passage, we must identify Nero with " the lawless one ; " but in what way can we suppose he was destroyed by the manifestation of Christ's personal Presence, inasmuch as that Introduction. xii monster of cruelty perished by his own hand two years before Jerusalem's overthrow, March 19, a.d. 68 .' Surely this is not the glorious Advent of Christ that we are taught to look for by our blessed Lord Himself, and by His Apostles. This could not be the hope which sustained the, early Christian.s, and led them to glory in tribulations, in view of " the inheritance incorruptible, undefiled, and that fadeth not away." Rather would such a view of our Lord's coming have had the tendency to extinguish Christian hope, to paralyse the grandest motives of the Christian life, and neutralize every noble effort in the cause of God. To think of Christ's Second Coming as past, reminds one of those mentioned by St. Paul in his Epistle to Timothy, "who con cerning the truth have erred, saying that the resurrection is past already ; and overthrow the faith of some." We might naturally expect to find amongst such a school of interpreters, Renan, and Baur, and Maurice, and Strauss, adapting Scrip ture prophecy to events occurring at the time when the predictions were written, and seeing only the circumstances and surroundings of the locality as affording an explana tion of what was expressed in type or symbol ; but it could hardly be supposed that men who claim to be defenders of the faith, and who are recognised as such, would be asso ciated with those whose teaching tends to loosen the fabric of Christianity and undermine the bulwarks of the Church. Then on the other hand, what is to be thought of those who regard the existence of the Seven Churches as mythical, and deny a historical foundation to them ? No Churches actually existed, say they, and the various circumstances expressive of their spiritual condition were merely inserted to fill up the details of the story, parable, or myth, as the case might be. If this scheme had any pretext for its reception, the whole Bible would be a meaningless pageant, and our common sense would receive such a shock when we attempted to understand xlii Introduction. it, that it would be utterly confounded. To be told there were no Churches in Asia Minor in St. John's time; no Epistles sent to them ; no Angels or presidents over them, would be to ignore all history, to suspend all reason, and ¦get transported into the shadowy region of a dreamy tran scendentalism. The Asiatic Churches, by whom Planted. When, or by whom, the gospel 'was first introduced into Asia Minor, we have no distinct record. We read that amongst those who were at Jerusalem on the Day of Pentecost, " dwellers in Cappadocia, in Pontus and Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia," were present. We may, therefore, conjecture that many of the Jews of those countries, who had seen the wonders in the city on that day, would be led to believe the gospel, and carry back to their households tidings of the things they had seen and heard. But little eflfect was apparent before the first visit of St. Paul to those places. Indeed, the Asiatic Churches, of which the chief was Ephesus, we may regard as primarily having been planted by that Apostle. In Acts xviii., we find mention of St. Paul, accompanied by Aquila and Priscilla (A.D. 54), as having left Corinth — where his missionary exertions had been successful in the conver sion to the faith, of Crispus, the chief ruler of the synagogue, and where " many of the Corinthians hearing, believed and were baptized ; " and we are told of his having sailed into Syria, and thence to Ephesus.^ He left Aquila and Priscilla there, and after reasoning in the synagogue with the Jews, he sailed from Ephesus and landed at Caesarea, on his way to Jerusalem. Then we find he went up and saluted the Church, and afterwards proceeded to Antioch. After spending some time there, we are informed " he departed, and went over all the country of Galatia and Phrygia, in order strengthening all > Acts xviii. 19-24. Introduction. xliii the disciples" From this, it appears that Christianity had ex isted in these quarters previous to St. Paul's first visit there. In Asia Minor both SS. Andrew and Philip had laboured; there it was Apollos joined Aquila and Priscilla; and the good work was carried on by these disciples, and afterwards by Tychicus. St. Paul, on his second visit to Ephesus, remained there for three years;! ^^d we may reasonably suppose he would, during that time, visit the cities which lay contiguous to that great commercial centre, and establish those Churches which, in after time, St. John was to have charge of, especially as it was not St. Paul's rule "to build upon another man's foundation."^ St. Paul remained longer at Ephesus than he did at any of the other large cities where Churches were planted ; and this accounts for the superior knowledge in the Divine mysteries of the gospel possessed by the Ephesians. He placed Timothy in charge of that Church, and in the Epistles which he addressed to him, he is styled the first Bishop of the Church of the Ephesians. It is thought by some writers, that the Churches of Asia Minor were first planted by St. John. Their view is, that he remained at Jerusalem till after the death of the mother of our Lord, and then went to reside at Ephesus. It is certain that St. Paul finds him at Jerusalem on the occasion of his third journey there ^ (A.D. 52), although there is no mention of his having met him on his first journey.* The death of the mother of our Lord occurred, according to Eusebius, A.D. 48, so that St. John was still at Jerusalem four years after that event ; and it is clear that St. John could not have been at Ephesus when St. Paul in A.D. 58 touched at Miletus, and sent for the presbyters of Ephesus to meet him there. We may, therefore, assume that, as has been already shown, not until after the martyrdom of St. Paul, did circumstances occur to induce St. John to direct his steps to those Asiatic 1 Acts xix. 10. - Rom. xv. 20. ' Gal. ii. 9. '• Gal. i. 19. xliv Introduction. Churches, which the former had founded ; and if this view be correct, we may regard A.D. 66 or 6^ as the year of St. John's removal from Jerusalem, and his entering upon the supervision and nurture of those Churches which occupied the greater portion of the latter years of his life. The Character of the Writer. Of all the disciples of our Lord, St. John stands pre eminently exalted. He was the disciple whom Jesus loved. He was one of the three privileged to enjoy the closest intimacy with the Saviour. He leaned on His breast at the Paschal supper, and to him our Lord, when on the cross, com mitted His mother. We see a gentle affectionate disposition on the part of this Apostle, and yet an impulsiveness, and a susceptibility of sudden flashes of anger, which made the title Boanerges peculiarly appropriate to the sons of Zebedee.^ Not that righteous indignation against sin is not allowable, but our Lord showed that a spirit of severity belonged more to the Jewish code than the Christian. We see also no little ambition on the part of this disciple, and not a little pride of worldly distinction, in the early days of his disciple ship ; but grace takes the rough stone from the quarry, and hews and chisels it, and makes it meet to occupy a dis tinguished place in the Lord's temple. The Apostle St. John breathes love throughout all his writings, and this shows us that, in possessing and extolling a quality not naturally inherent in him, the Holy Spirit exerted that Divine in fluence upon him which qualified him not only for Apostle ship, but for writing that portion of the New Testament which was to be the consummation of the Sacred Canon. Modern painters have given him- a languid, soft, effeminate expression, as the type of his character ; but more properly the eagle should be his symbol. ' Luke ix. 54. Introduction, xlv Clemens of Alexandria records a touching story regarding him on his return from Patmos.^ At one of the Churches he committed to the care of the bishop, a young man to whom he felt himself powerfully drawn, and one whom he considered well suited to the work of the ministry. The bishop received the young man, and promised to educate and watch over him, and do all in his power to prepare him for the course marked out by the Apostle. The youth, freed from restraint, became idle and dissolute, and at length renouncing all hope in the grace of God, he joined himself to a band of robbers, put himself at their head, and surpassed them all in cruelty and violence. Some time afterwards St. John visited the city, and after arranging some matters, he said to the bishop — " Well, bishop, restore the pledge which the Saviour and I entrusted to thee in the presence of the congregation ! " The bishop was at first alarmed, supposing that St. John was charging him with misappropriating money that had been given to him. At length the Apostle said, " I demand again that young man and the soul of the brother." The old man sighed heavily, and with tears, replied : " He is dead ! " " Dead ? " said the disciple of the Lord. " In what way did he die ? " "He is dead to God," responded the bishop. "He became godless, and finally a robber." The Apostle, with a loud cry, rent his clothing, and smote his head, and ex claimed — " To what a keeper have I committed my brother's soul .' " Instantly he takes a horse and a guide, and hastens to the spot where the band of robbers was to be found. He is seized by their guard, he makes no attempt to escape, but cries out : " I have come for this very purpose ; take me to your captain ! " Their captain completely armed is awaiting their arrival, but, recognising St. John as he approached, flees, from a ' Quis Div. Salv. ? u. 42. The Chron. Alexand., says the city, where this incident occurred, was Smyrna, and that Polycarp was the bishop. xlvi Introduction. sense of shame. St. John, nevertheless, forgetting his age, hastens after him with all speed, crying, "Why, my son, do you flee from me— from me your father, an unarmed old man .' Have compassion on me, my son ; do not be afraid. You yet have a hope of life. I will give account to Christ for you, should needs be. I will gladly die for you ; Christ endured death for us. For thy sake I will give in ransom my own soul. Stop! believe! Christ hath sent me." Hearing these words, he first stands still, and casts his eyes upon the ground. He next throws away his arms, and begins to tremble and to weep bitterly. When the old man approached, he clasped his knees, and with the most vehement agony- pleaded for forgiveness, baptizing himself anevs^ as it were, with his own tears. The Apostle finally led him back to the Church. Here he pleaded with him earnestly, strove with him in fasting, urged him with monitions, until he was able to restore him to the Church, an example of sincere repent ance and genuine regeneration. Polycarp records another incident of the beloved disciple, as presented to us as the Son of Thunder, in the fact of St. John having fled from a bath in which he found the heretic, Cerinthus, saying that he feared it would fall upon their heads. And Jerome adds the following: "When St. John had reached his extremest old age, he became too feeble to walk to the meetings, and was carried to them by young men. He could no longer say much, but he constantly repeated the words, " Little children, love one another ! " When he was asked why he constantly repeated this expression, his answer was, " Because this is the command of the Lord, and because enough is done if but this one thing be done." ^ Nor do we lose sight of the well defined lines of character of this eagle-eyed disciple, in the scenes he witnessed, when he beheld those visions of God in the Isle of Patmos. 1 Jerome, Com. ad Galat., vi. lo, vol. iii. p. 314. "Filioli, diligite alterutrum — quia preceptum Domini est, et si solum fiat, sufficit." Introduction. xlvii The man who could calmly look on, when thunders were pealing, seals opening, when trumpets were shaking the solid earth and vials were being poured out with all their scathing violence, must have had courage of no ordinary character, faith to enable him to penetrate the dark cloud, and patience leading him to endure, and wait, and hope for the unveiling of the mystery. If St. Matthew, in the cherubic symbols of Ezekiel, might be represented by a Lion, as one who gives prominence to the royalty of Christ ; if St. Mark may be fitly represented by a Man, to indicate the manner in which he sets forth the humanity of Christ ; if St. Luke may be sym bolized by ah Ox, the animal used in sacrifices, inasmuch as the priesthood and propitiation of Christ are clearly defined in his Gospel, we may compare the beloved disciple to the Eagle, soaring towards heaven, teaching us to look upward, and gaze on the uncreated glory and splendour of our Divine Redeemer. He has drawn aside the veil which hides heaven's glories ; he has opened up a vista, and enabled us to see unrolled by Him who is styled, " the Lion of the tribe of Judah," the seven-sealed book of Prophecy and Providence, with all its dark secrets, with its deep impenetrable mysteries ; and lest we should be doubtful or discouraged, he has given us a glimpse of the new heaven and the new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness, and which Christian faith and hope delight to contemplate. St. John, the Amanuensis; Christ the Author of the Revelation. It has been said, that if our Lord Jesus Christ intended that men should learn religion from a book. He Himself would have written that book, but that He wrote no part of the New Testament. Now the Book of the Revelation is strictly and properly that of which He has the claim to be the exalted Author. The book is called the Revelation of St. John, but xlviii Introduction. the first verse of the first chapter applies the authorship to Christ, 'AtroKaXv^it 'Irjaov Xpiarov. He speaks not by in spiration as the Apostles; but He, "in whom dwelt all the fulness of the Godhead bodily," directly shows to His servant John those things which are contained in this book, embracing the things which were, when St. John wrote, and the things which were to be hereafter. Christ told His disciples, " I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now.'' He gradually opened their understandings and hearts to receive the truth. During the great Forty Days, He was making known to them the things He had heard of His Father, and afterwards He sent His Holy Spirit " to show the Apostles things to come ; " and now, to complete the revealed record, Christ discloses all that God had designed the Church should know in this dis pensation, regarding the scheme of redemption. The thread of the Church's history is taken up here from the Acts of the Apostles, and as we read in that history of the planting and watering of Churches by the Apostles in various parts of the great Roman Empire, so here we get a glimpse of some of those Churches, half a century afterwards — whether faith ful or faithless, whether maintaining first love or lukewarm, whether holding the truth or giving way to error, beacons to warn us of danger on the one hand, or to guide us safely to our destination on the other. Then are we introduced to the Inner Sanctuary. We, who have been made acquainted with, and have been sharers in, the sufferings of Christ, are also permitted to see in symbol and in shadow the glory that is to be revealed— the closing scenes of this dispensation, and the dawn of that brighter and better day, which is to be ushered in by the actual manifesta tion of the Son of God in power and great glory. THE MESSAGES TO THE SEVEN CHURCHES OF ASIA MINOR. INSCRIPTION AND DOXOLOGY. Chap. i. i-8. I 'A?roraXvi/'is 'IijiroO Xpiarou, f/v ^So}Kei> air^ 6 Qebs, Sel^cu tois SoiJXois airoO a S« yeviadai iv rax^i- Kol ia-rniavev AToarelXas Sii. rov &yyiKov auroC r$ SoiXif aliTov 'lujdvPT], 2 'Os €ii,apTipi](7e rov \liyov'TO\j efou, ko! t^jc /laprvpiav 'l-qaov XpiffToO, Sera etSe. 3 Ma/tdpios 6 cLvayivilKTKWi', xal ol dicoiovTes Tois \6yovs rijs Tvpotfrqreias, Kal TTjpovvTes TO, iv aln-fj y€ypap.fji,iva- 6 yh,p Kacpos iyyvs. 4 'ladvv-rjs rats eirri iKK\rip,evor Kai d-iro tZv iiTTk Tvev/idTOiv & ivJnnov tov 6p6vov airoO. 5 Kai idTTo 'Ii/ffoC XpuTTOv, o puiprvs 6 mo-Tos, 6 TporroTOKOS tuv vtKpiiv, Kal 6 Hpxiiiv tQv PaffiXioiv t^s 7?s- t(} Aya-Truvn ¦lip.as, Kal \oiaavTL r]p,S,! diro rue ap.ap- Tiiov ijfiwv iv T£p oXp^aTL oiJroO, 6 Kal i-n-ol-q, 'ipxirai. /terd tuv ve prophets. They must be wise above what is written, and rashly fix dates for prophetic fulfilments ; and sometimes these very men live to find their utterances contradicted by fact. Our aim should be not to speculate, but earnestly and soberly search and watch and wait for God's time. Like the wheels in Ezekiel's vision, when the spirit moved they moved, and when the spirit stood they stood — so should we ; or to take another figure, we are not to go before the pillar of cloud or to lag behind, but to regulate our procedure by its movement. When our Lord has distinctly said : " But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father," it is our wisdom to be silent. It is no part of Christ's office to reveal it. The word olBev in this passage means to deter- 6 The Messages to the Seven Churches mine, or to declare ; for Christ, as God, knows all that the Father knows, inasmuch as in Him are hid all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge; but it has been His will and pleasure to conceal as well as reveal, thereby teaching us to exercise faith and hope, and wait patiently until the light of eternity, if need be, will render luminous the darkness of time. "The things that were shortly to come to pass" were given by distinct revelation from Christ ; and human cal culations are all vain conjectures. We are told, for example, that the measurements of the Great Pyramid at Memphis exactly correspond to certain fixed periods of Biblical chronology I If this be so, then the things which " no man knoweth," are so clearly made known that they are de monstrated by mathematical precision ! In that case the Pharaohs and Ptolemies of Egypt who built that pyramid must have had a special revelation, and a knowledge of facts of which we are ignorant, and must be ignorant, because Christ has willed it to be so. Such statements as those marking a connection between things that are utterly op posed to one another, or at least that have no affinity, are mere puerile trifling. Better to be contented with what we know, and not pry into secrets which lie beyond us. To do so is like lifting the lid of the ark and looking in, for which act the men of Bethshemesh perished. " The secret things belong unto the Lord our God, but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever " (Deut. xxix. 29) . KoX ia-r}p,avev aTToaTeiXai; Bid tov dyyeXov avrov too BovXco avTov 'Iwdwrj, and He sent and signijied it by His angel unto His servant John. The word " it " is not in the original, and it may either be taken absolutely as referring to the revelation, or it may be applied to a Bel yeveadai, in which case the word supplied should be "them." The manner of Asia Minor. 7 of making known to St. John the things that must shortly come to pass was "by His angel." This shows us that angels are in Christ's hands, and under His authority. We read that the " law was given by the disposition of angels." " The word spoken by angels " is placed in contrast with the word spoken in these last days by the Son of God ; so that angels have, from the earliest times, occupied an important place in the communications of God's revealed will. In this book we do not find the angel making known anything to the Apostle before chap. xvii. i. In chap. vi. i, one of the four living creatures calls upon St. John to " come and see"; and in chap. vii. 13 one of the elders gives him the necessary information ; but there is little to be gathered from the book as to what was communicated to St. John by the angel, or how this was done. As symbolic repre sentations may be supposed to have passed before the Apostle, perhaps the angel may have made known their meaning, although we have no direct proof as to whether St. John knew what these symbols which he saw signified. We know that much of what was written by the Apostles was enigmatical to themselves. They prophesied, but knew not the interpretation of their own prophecies (i Pet. i. 10-12) ; and we may therefore conceive that the office of the angel was to present the symbols before the mind of St. John, so as to enable him to record them. In the administration of Providence angels are employed for carrying out God's purposes, and in the afifairs of grace they exert a moral and spiritual influence for good upon the minds of God's people. They are ministering spirits waiting to bring support and relief to His servants under every pressure. " The angel of the Lord encamps around them that fear Him." We may therefore understand how they have been employed in making known the manifold wisdom of God, in the revela tion of His will. 8 The Messages to the Seven Churches TO) BovXw avTov 'Iwdwrj, to His servant John. He does not call himself an Apostle, and it has been contended that the Book of Revelation was not the work of St. John. But if this argument has any weight, St. James's Epistle and St. Jude's would both be wanting in authenticity and genuine ness, because the writer of each does not style himself an Apostle. St. John remembered the words of his Master : " The servant is not greater than his Lord " ; and although he was permitted to possess the gift of prophecy, and un derstand all mysteries, and speak with the tongue of angels, he was not exalted above measure by the abundance of his revelations, but possessed that ornament of a meek and quiet spirit which is in God's sight inestimably precious. St. Paul, in his Epistle to the Romans, calls himself "a servant of Jesus Christ." Was he less an Apostle, or was his Epistle less genuine, because he adopted this style of expression ? Ver. 2. o? ipMprvprjae tov Xoyov tov Geov Kal Trjv fiap- Tvpiav 'Irjaov Xpiarov, oaa elBe, who bare witness of the Word of God, and of tlie testimony of Jesus Christ, even of all things that he saw. In Acts i. 8 we find our Lord told His disciples, " Ye shall be witnesses unto Me." Others may bear witness respecting the works of Christ, but ye shall bear witness of His person as the Son of God. Here St. John speaks of his own witness-bearing. This expression is one in frequent use by St. John (i John i. 2 ; iv. 14). But what does he mean to convey by it here ? Vitringa thinks reference is made to the Gospel which had already been written by St. John ; but from the style of the writer, and his familiarity with • Hellenistic Greek, it is considered that the Gospel was written subsequently to the Apocalypse. May not his witness-bearing here refer to the testimony he had borne to the Word of God, whether in teaching or otherwise, and for which he was then an exile >. All the other books of the New Testament had already been written. The three Gospels had entered into of Asia Minor. 9 an historic detail of our Lord's works — His life, death, and resurrection ; but none of them had sufficiently dwelt on the Divine side of Christ's character, and we may regard St. John as prominently proclaiming Christ as. "the true God and eternal life." Augustine says of St. John : " He speaks of the Divinity of our Lord as no other person has spoken. He pours forth that into which he had drunk. For not without a reason is it mentioned in his own Gospel that at the feast he reclined upon the bosom of his Lord. From that bosom he had in secrecy drunk in the stream, but what he drank in secret he poured forth openly." ^ And Origen, speaking of the Gospel which St. John wrote, observes : " As the Gospels are the first-fruits of all the Scriptures, the first-fruits of the Gospels is that of St. John, into whose meaning no man can enter unless he has reclined upon the bosom of Jesus." Nowhere can we see moral beauty so well delineated as in St. John's testimony of Christ's character ; and that moral beauty has such a constraining effect as to compel the ad miration of the world. The Gentile might see in the outer world the marks of a Divine hand, the Jew might behold God clothed in majesty — " His pavilion round about Him dark waters, and thick clouds of the sky " ; but to us Christ is the personal manifestation of the Divine character. Here " mercy and truth meet together, righteousness and peace have kissed each other." Even to those who are strangers to the truth, there is something in the character of Christ so ineflfably sublime and attractive that they are compelled to say, " Never man spake like this Man." " Go to your natural religion," — says Bishop Sherlock, contrasting Christ with the founder of the Mahometan faith, — " lay before her Mahomet and his disciples arrayed in armour and in blood, riding in triumph over the spoils of thousands, and tens of thousands, who fell by his victorious sword ; show her the ^ Aug., Tract, 'id in Joan. IO The Messages to the Seven Churches cities which he set in flames, the countries which he ravaged and destroyed, and the miserable distress of all the inhabi tants of the earth. When she has viewed him in this scene, carry her into his retirements ; show her the prophet's chamber, his concubines and wives, and hear him allege revelation to justify his lust and oppression.' When she is tired with this prospect, then show her the blessed Jesus, humble and meek, doing good to all the sons of men, patiently instructing both the ignorant and perverse ; let her see Him in His most retired privacy ; let her follow Him to the mountain, and hear His devotions and supplications to God ; carry her to His table to see His poor fare, and hear His heavenly discourses ; let her see Him injured, but not provoked ; let her attend Him to the tribunals, and consider the patience with which He endured the scoffs and reproaches of His enemies. Lead her to His cross, and let her view Him in the agony of death, and hear His last prayer for His persecutors : ' Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.' When natural religion has seen both, ask which is the prophet of God ? But her answer we have already had. When she saw part of His scene through the eyes of the centurion who attended at the cross, by him she spake and said, ' Truly this man was the Son of God.' " ^ Contrast ing Christ with Socrates — Rousseau says : " If the life and death of Socrates be the life and death of a sage, the life and death of Jesus were those of a God." How shall we account for that beauty of character which the very enemies of our Lord admit .? If Christ be not Divine, then we must reject it as the baseless fabric of a vision. KoX Trjv papTVpiav 'Irjaoij Xpiarov, and of the testimony of Jesus Christ. St. John not only was a witness-bearer of the Word of God, but of the testimony of Jesus Christ ; namely, of the testimony which Christ bore to the truth. This clearly ' Sherlock's Sermons, vol. i. p. 271. of Asia Minor. 1 1 shows that our Lord was a witness. In Rev. iii. 14, He is called " the faithful and true Witness." Christ bore witness to the Old Testament Scriptures. He testified to man's con dition and destiny, and by His resurrection opened up to those who, through fear of death, were all their lifetime subject to bondage, the joys and hopes of a bright and glorious immor tality. St. John was one of the privileged Apostles, and he had frequent opportunities of hearing from the lips of Christ those teachings in which, whether in the world at large, in the Jewish synagogue, or before Pontius Pilate, Christ witnessed a good confession ; and he alone of all the Apostles has frequently referred to this. For example, John viii. 18 : " I am one that bear witness of Myself, and the Father that sent Me beareth witness of Me." John xviii. 37 : " To this end was I born, and for this cause came I into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth." St. John then means to convey to us that he was a witness of Christ's faithful testimony to the truth as connected with those great eternal realities which He came to reveal to man. oaa elBe, of all things that he saw. He did not record what was merely the product of his own imagination, but the things which God showed to him. "The prophecy came not in old time by the will of man " — and so here what he saw was the direct and infallible revelation of Jesus Christ. Ver. 3. MaKdpioq 6 dvayivoaaKcov, Kal oi dKOVovTei tou? \070u9 Ttj^ TT/so^ijTeta?, Kal TrjpoijVTe^ to, iv airy yeypap.p,eva- 6 yap Kaipcxi iyyv'i. Blessed is he that readeth, and they that hear the words of the prophecy, and keep the things which are written therein: for the time is at hand. The allusion is here to a public reader, whose office it was to read aloud for the benefit of the audience, as was done in Eastern countries before the art of printing was discovered, and when books written on parchment rolls were the only source of 12 The Messages to the Seven Churches information available, apart from that of vivA voce teaching. The blessing here applies both to the reader and hearer ; and we have therefore a very strong argument -against those who say that the prophetic portions of Scripture should not be studied, because unprofitable. "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness," etc. (2 Tim. iii. 16). There are three words here, " read," "hear," "keep," which show that this book was not merely to be read, but studied, so as to ascertain, in so far as it is given to man to understand, the development of prophecy; and, in the exercise of this investigation, the student would derive such benefit as would guard him against coming dangers, and thus prove a blessing to him. The word, dKovovTeavvri<; rat? eTTTa iKKXrjaiai^ Tat? eV t^ Aaia' ydpi^ vp-iv Kal eipijvr] aTro 6 wv, Kal 6 rjv, Kal 6 ep')(pp,evo<;' Kal aTro TOiv emd irvevp.dTOiV a ivanriov tov Opovov a-uroU, John, to the seven churches which are in Asia : Grace unto you, and peace from Him which is, and which was, and which is to come ; and from the seven Spirits which are before His throne. In this address, or inscription, St. John speaks of himself as the author or writer of this book. The style he adopts in this address is peculiar. He speaks of himself as John. Now there could be no difficulty in ascertaining who was meant by this name. He was the only one of the twelve Apostles then living, and no individual except himself could properly make use of such a mode of prefacing what he was about to write. ' See Joseph., de BeU. Jud., lib. 7, cap. 8, sect. 7. of Asia Minor. 15 He does not call himself an Apostle, as St. Peter and St. Paul, at the commencement of their Epistles, nor does he, in any way, afford evidence of his identity as the last sur viving Apostle. Like St. James, in ver. i, he is described as the Lord's servant, John. In the title of the book he is styled John the Divine, 6 BeoXLyo%, but this title was given him by the Fathers because, more than any other of the inspired writers of the New Testament, he discussed the sublime mysteries of Christian theology, and particularly asserted and enforced the doctrine of Christ's divinity.^ Irenaeus, who was brought up under the ministry of Poly carp, who was contemporary with the Apostle St. John, in many instances ascribes this book to "St. John, the Evangelist, the Disciple of the Lord, that John who leaned on the Lord's breast at the last supper":^ and Polycarp, Bishop of Smyrna, who was privileged to converse with, and to be a disciple of, St. John, begins the solemn prayer which he uttered at the stake, when about to seal by martyr dom the testimony which he held, with the words of Rev. xi. 17 : Kvpie, 6 ©eo?, o TravTOKparmp. Tai<; eTTTa iKKXrjaiai^ Tali iv Tr} Acria, to the seven Churches which are in Asia. The "Asia" here mentioned was strictly what was known by Proconsular Asia, and embraced the > two divisions of Ionia and Lydia. Its capital was Ephesus, > where, we are informed, St. John lived after his return from exile, and wrote his Gospel, and died. " After the death of Domitian, he returned from Patmos to Ephesus, where he lived to the reign of Trajan, and died at Ephesus in the ' sixty-eighth year after our Lord's crucifixion." * That these seven Churches were neither the whole of the Churches of the district, nor in some respects the most influential, we have evidence to show. At Colossae, Hiera- 1 McLeod on Rev., lect. ii. p. 21. ^ Iren., lib. iv. p. 330. 8 Iren., ii. 22. Euseb., iii. 23. 1 6 The Messages to the Seven Churches polls. Magnesia, and Tralles, there were Churches ; but these were unnoticed in the messages conveyed to the Asiatic Churches. The number seven denotes totality, universality, • completeness, and therefore the messages sent to the seven • were designed for the edification of all Churches in every age. This is clearly seen from the concluding words of each message : " He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the Churches." There is no number of such frequent occurrence in the Revelation as seven. We have seven seals, seven candlesticks, seven trumpets, seven spirits, seven vials, etc., and as it is the number denoting perfection or completeness, we may look upon the seven Churches as types of the Christian Church of all ages unto the end of time. If the Epistles written by other Apostles to particular Churches were designed for general application, it could hardly be supposed that these should be limited, because whatever has been written for encouragement or warning, for approval or condemnation, for instruction or discipline, is adapted to all others under the same circum stances. These Churches illustrate doctrine, they inculcate obedience now as well as in the first or second century ; and in this respect they have a prospective reference. But it should never be supposed that these Churches were so many allegorical representations of successive stages of Christen dom. This would be to confound history with allegory ; and distinctly " the things that are " are marked by a line of demarcation broad enough for all purposes from " the things that shall be hereafter." The prophetic part of Revelation does not commence till the beginning of the fourth chapter ; and therefore all that is addressed to these Churches is historic narrative. 'Xdpi'i v/jblv Kal eip-qvr) diro 6 av, Kal 6 ^v, Kal 6 ipyop.evoi;, Grace unto you, and peace, from Him which is, and which was, and which is to come. This is the usual salutation in all of Asia Minor. 1 7 the Apostolic Epistles, except in those of St. Paul to Timothy and Titus, in which e\eo?, mercy, is placed between "grace and peace." It has been observed by Wordsworth that Xdpi^, grace, was the Greek form of social greeting {^aipeiv), and Eip-^vT], peace, the Hebrew D'b^ (shalom), and that St. John elevates and spiritualizes, consecrates and Christianizes, the Greek and Hebrew forms of social salutation, and gives an Apostolic greeting to the world. How different is this from the conventional mode of salutation amongst us — • worldly prosperity, health, happiness, and the expression of ¦ our good wishes for each other. St. John in his Epistle to the well-beloved Gains, conveys the same idea as he has here expressed : " Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth " (3 John 2). He desired for him worldly prosperity in the ratio 1 of his soul's prosperity. Generally we read the Apostle's good wish backwards : Get worldly advantage at any cost, and, like Lot, choose the well watered plains of Sodom, even at the risk of losing the soul ! Grace is the free favour of God, and peace is the result of it. Every good and perfect gift that we receive is of God's grace ; and St. Jerome makes use of the frequent Apostolic salutation as an argument against the Pelagians, when he says : " St. Paul, who was more eminent in labours than the rest of the Apostles, is a signal example of humility, ascribing all his powers to Divine grace." ^ Grace is designed to bestow upon us the fulness of the blessing of the Gospel of Christ in our salvation ; and, when that grace has been conveyed to the soul of a sinner, it issues in his justification, and peace is the fruit which follows. diro 6 av, Kal 6 rjv, Kal o epxop'evo'i, from Him which is, and which was, and which is to come. These words are a paraphrase of the Hebrew XV\7V_, Jehovah, and the fact of the participles 1 not having been declined, as the name Jehovah was not, would 1 Jerome, adv. Pelag., Dial. ii. p. 515. C 1 8 The Messages to the Seven Churches indicate that God, the self-existent One, was unchangeable — the same yesterday, to-day, and for ever ; and what greater source of consolation to the suffering Christian than to know that the Being on whom he is relying changes not — that He "rests in His love." To Moses in the wilderness God revealed Himself, "E,yai eip,i 6 wv, I am the Existing One: and the salutation of this passage resembles that description which God gave of Himself. The Jerusalem Targum renders the expression / am that I am by the very words before us, " who was, is, and shall be."^ It may be observed that the word e/j^oyiiero? is the key note of Revelation. It runs like a silver thread through the entire book. It enters into it at the beginning, and it is summed up at the end by " Surely I come quickly." All its teachings, warnings, hopes, and promises, point to this grand event, and it is with precision and point well designated the Book of the Second Advent. Kai diro TWV eTTTa Trvevpiareov a evwiriov tov dpovov avrov, and from the seven Spirits which are before His throne. The Holy Spirit in His sevenfold operations and gifts : one in essence, but sevenfold in influence ; or as the number seven is that which marks perfection, the Holy Spirit in His com plete and perfect energy — must be here understood. Here the blessings of grace and peace are traced to a Triune God. It has been thought by some that " the seven Spirits before the throne" are seven angels which stand in God's presence, as the Jews were of opinion that as seven princes stood in the Persian court before the king, angels occupied a like position in heaven. In the apocryphal Books of Tobit (xii. 15) and Enoch (xx.) seven holy angels are represented as ' Plumptre, Ep. to Seven Churches, p. 13, quotes the inscription jn the temple of Athene (the Egyptian Isis) at Sais, alluded to by Plutarch, as bearing a striking similarity to this Divine Name : 'E7U ei/ni ttoi' to ye-^ovin, Kal iv, Kal io-6p.evov, I am all that has come into being, and that which is, and that which shall be, and to this is added, " and no man hath lifted my veil." of Asia Minor. 1 9 " watching, presenting the prayers of saints, and going in and out before the glory of God." But surely there would be a gross incongruity in placing any created being on a level with the absolute and eternal God, and more so in supposing that St. John would invoke grace and peace from any but God. It is true that God in the administration of His provi dence and grace makes use of angels in carrying out His purposes ; but we may not, under the pretence of voluntary humility that man in his fallen state needs the mediation of angels, worship or invoke them, which is strictly forbidden (Col. ii. 18 ; Rev. xix. 10). In the Epistle of St. Paul to the Hebrews, he shows, in chap, i., that Christ is pre-eminently above angels, which are "ministering spirits sent forth to minister to them who are heirs of salvation," and that His dignity is lowered by our yielding homage to those who are merely His servants. When in early times false teachers, such as Cerinthus and the Ebionites, introduced angel worship into their systems, they were condemned by the Church ; and specially was the Council of Laodicea (AD. 363) con vened for repressing, among other things, the errors of angel worship, which council decreed that " Christians may not leave the Church of God, and go away and invoke the names of angels : and let such persons be anathema, for they desert our Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God." ^ Can it be supposed, therefore, that St. John would couple angels » with God the Father and God the Son, omitting all refer ence to the Holy Spirit, as the source of grace and peace 1 Besides, angels are never called " spirits " in the Apocalypse. < The words "who maketh His angels spirits, and His minis ters a flame of fire" (Ps. civ. 4), have no reference to the nature of angels, but to the mode of their agency in the , natural world, when employed by God as His messengers. " Who maketh His angels to be winds, and His ministers to 1 Labb., Cone., i. 1530, sq. ed. Coleti. 20 The Messages to the Seven Churches be a flame of fire," is the correct rendering of that passage. God makes use of them as His servants ; and they are all standing to do His high behests. In Rev. iii. i, our Lord is said, " to have the seven Spirits of God," i.e. all the fulness of the Holy Spirit that rests on Him (Isa. Ixi. i ; Luke iv. i8). Now if by these Spirits we were to understand " angels," what meaning would be conveyed .' What distinction to Christ to hold the angels in His hand, as He was Lord of all creation } It would be a mere truism which would have no connection whatever with the circumstances of the Church addressed. In the words, therefore, which we have been considering, it is no created being that is brought before us, placed on the same level with the Almighty, but it is He who inspired the Psalmist to write of the Son of God before He came into the world, "Let all the angels of God worship Him." Ver. 5- K-oi drro 'Irjaov Xpiarov, 6 p,dpTvTu? 6 Trto-To?, where the words which are in apposition are in different cases. Critics have supposed that the structure of such phrases shows the Apostle's deficiency « in the knowledge of the Greek language, never for a mo ment considering whether there was a design on the part of the inspired writer in such departures from the ordinary rules of grammar. In Verse 4, we have had occasion to notice this already in conpection with the names of God, with whom there is no variableness nor shadow of turning ; and Bishop Wordsworth well observes on this point that these remark able structures which, by their singularity, attract the reader's attention, serve as mementos that the truths which they ex- i press transcend the reach of human thought and language. 2 2 The Messages to the Seven Churches o •npwTOTOKO'i T&v veKp&v, the first born of the dead. This designation peculiariy belongs to Christ. He was the first raised from the dead never to die again. He had raised others — Jairus' daughter, the widow's son at Nain, and Lazarus ' —but all these were restored to life by Him who is the Prince of Life, only to die again. But Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more, death hath no more dominion over him. He was the Firstfruits of them that slept. As the firstfruits of. the barley harvest were taken into the temple and presented as a wave offering before the Lord, the pledge of the coming harvest ; so Christ was the Firstfruits from the grave, the earnest, and pledge, and pattern of that future resurrection to which the Church of God in every age has been looking forward in anxious expectation. He was the first who could say, " O grave, where is thy victory 1 " His primogeniture is threefold : (i) From eternity he was the first begotten of the Father. (2) When He was born at Bethlehem, He was the firstborn son of Mary. (3) And here He is by His glorious Resurrection proclaimed the Firstborn of the dead — the Son of God with power ; and, in virtue of His being, the Firstborn of the dead, He is the source of that spiritual life by which the new creation is quickened and sustained. Hence He is the Head of the Church which is His body, the fulness of Him that fiUeth all in all. In the expression, irpwTOTOKos, we see One who, by His resurrection, carried life into the chambers of the dead ; for, on the morning of the resurrection, many saints which slept arose, and formed the vanguard of His mighty train. He was TrpeoTOTo/eo?, I because He was the first to arise by His own power. He had said, " I have power to lay down My life, and I have power to take it again." In all who returned to life before our Lord's resurrection, life was not merely resumed, but restored ; it was given back, not taken. He had laid it down voluntarily, and now He takes it again. He is Tr/aoiTOTKoo?, because He of Asia Minor. 23 has taken precedence of His people who shall at His sum mons rise from the dead : " Because I live, ye shall live also." He is the harbinger of our resurrection, the Elder Brother of the family that no man could number, redeemed out of every nation, and kindred, and people, and tongue — countless as the sand on the seashore, bright and varied as the myriad stars which light up the dome of heaven. Blessed day when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal immortality ; and when shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, " Death is swallowed up in victory " ! KoX 6 ap'xwv TOiv ^aaiXecov t-»j? 7)}?, and the ruler of the kings of tJu earth. When our Lord had achieved the victory over death. He proclaimed Himself as having all power in heaven and on earth. When He had endured the cross, despising the the shame, God highly exalted Him. His triumphs were the reward of His humiliation. These are and have been appa rent in the history of His Church for nineteen centuries ; nor are His conquests ended. " His name shall endure for ever ; it shall be lasting as the sun ; men shall be blessed in Him ; all nations shall call Him blessed." Voltaire said he lived in the twilight of Christianity, meaning that it should soon die out in endless night ; but it was the twilight before the dawn of a yet brighter and more glorious day than ever the world saw : that day when the Prince of the kings of the earth shall be crowned King of kings and Lord of lords. " The kings of the earth have set themselves, and the rulers have taken counsel together against the Lord and against His Anointed, but He that sits in the heavens shall laugh, the Lord shall have them in derision." There need be no fear of the Gospel failing in success, or being driven back to the shores of Gennesaret. It has had opponents in the past, as it has enemies now ; but it has gone forward in its march of conquest from victory to victory, and will not cease until He, whose right it is to take the kingdom to Himself and reign, shall come with power and 24 The Messages to the Seven Churches great glory. Religions have risen in opposition to the religion of the Cross, but they have become feeble and effete, while Christianity is yet young, because her Author lives, and " has still the dew of His youth." Empires rise and fall, kingdoms fade and perish, but the kingdom of Christ, which is the Church, can never be moved, for He is in the midst of her, and He shall help her and that right eariy. " By Me kings reign, and princes decree justice." Every event occurring around us is only the forerunner of the overthrow, the final overthrow, of the powers of darkness, the unbolting of the bars of the prison of bondage and corruption, and the delivering of groan ing creation from the curse, and the ushering in of the joyous Advent when, as amid the voice of many waters and the voice of mighty thunderings, shall the welcome of the count less multitude of the ransomed of the Lord be heard, saying, " Alleluia ! for the Lord God omnipotent reigneth" (Rev. xix. 6, 19-21). Tc5 dyairavTi rjp,d<; Kal XovaavTi 'fjp,d<; drro twv ap^apTiuv ¦fjfiSiv ev TO) a'ip,aTi avrov, unto Him that loveth us, and washed us from our sins by His blood. , The participle, df^a-irwvTi, is the present tense, and conveys to us the idea of a per- ' petual love. Those whom He once loves He loves to the end. " Who can separate us from the love of Christ .' " Cer tainly nothing external to us, but we must exercise vigilance and prayer, lest the enemy of souls get an advantage over us. While Christ alone can keep us from falling, we are told to keep ourselves in the love of God.^ It is needful both to believe as if Christ did all, and to work as if we ourselves did all in the matter of our salvation. Our love to Christ springs from His love to us ; and if the love of Christ, even to His death for us on the Cross, does not constrain us to give our selves — our souls and bodies — as a living sacrifice to Him, nothing else can. Christ is the exponent of the Father's love, * ' Jude 21. of Asia Minor. 25 not the procuring cause of it. It was not that God did not love us, and that Christ came and removed the hindrances ; for the heart of God was not turned away from His wayward children ; but Christ's coming into the world was a proof of the love of God : so that we may well say with the Apostle, " O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and know ledge of God ! how unsearchable are His judgments, and His ways past finding out ! " (Rom. xi. 33). Kal Xovaavri fjp.d. Im possible. The martyrs' blood could not wash the stain of sin from their own souls. No man could redeem his brother, or give to God a ransom for him. Each must own, "Jesus Christ is my Redeemer." And the theme of rejoicing through eternity will be this grand fact, that Christ has washed us from our sins in His own blood. When one of the elders asked the Seer of Patmos, " Who are these arrayed in white robes, and whence came they? " and when St. John teplied : " My Lord, thou knowest," the answer came : " These are they which come out of the great tribulation, and they washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb : therefore are they before the throne of God" (Rev. vii. 13-15). Ver. 6. KoX itroirjaev rjp.d<; ^aaiXeiav iepei<; tS ©e

vii. 12) in which there is a sevenfold ascription of praise to God and to the Lamb. It is remarkable that the article is placed before each of the subjects of praise which make up this doxology, thus confining the honour to those to whom it is ascribed, a clear proof of the Godhead of Christ. All these doxologies are of the nature of prayer, not petition but adoration, which is the highest form of prayer, and which will enter largely into the communion of saints with God in heaven. The Te Deum, the Gloria in Excelsis, the Sanctus, are all of this character. In the Temple service, public prayer always concluded with a doxology. The people made the response : " Blessed be the name bf the glory of His kingdom for ever and ever." The doxology was never used in private prayer, or in the synagogue ; and in this respect we have an argument for the use of the Lord's prayer both in public and private, as recorded by St. Matthew and St Luke, occurring as it does in the one Gospel with a doxology, and in the other without it. The more we dwell upon the excellencies of the Divine character, the more do they be come the subjects of thankful praise and adoration, and kindle within us feelings of joy and reverence and love. Praise takes the place of prayer, and we enter as it were within the sacred precincts of the Holy of Holies. We join for the moment with the general assembly and Church of the firstborn in heaven, and mingle with angels and archangels and all the company of heaven, in their hallowed, appropriate and unremitting employment. It is for this reason that doxologies are of such frequent occurrence in Scripture. They express an acknowledgment of all blessings and gifts as coming from a Triune God, and gratitude to Him as the Giver of every good and perfect gift. Here glory and dominion are ascribed to Christ : glory, the bright manifesta tion of His excellencies ; dominion, the right which belongs to Him of universal sovereignty, whether in the kingdom of of Asia Minor. 3 1 Providence or grace. There is glory in the natural world, and every devout Christian as he looks upward to the bound less fields of space must join the Psalmist in saying, " The heavens declare the glory of God and the firmament showeth His handiwork " ; but what perfections meet in all their loveliness and beauty — wisdom, power, justice, mercy, faith fulness, and love — in that new creation which He has made in the hearts of men, with its joys, and hopes, and aspirations, and which will outshine the stars of heaven, and last when the cycles of time shall have ceased to revolve ! " It is more blessed to give than to receive." God is al ways giving, never receiving ; and there is glory in this. On the Cross of Calvary we might read in letters of gold : " Ye know the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ, that, though He was rich, yet for your sakes He became poor, that ye, through His poverty, might be rich." It is said that on one occasion Alexander the Great told the philosopher, Anaxarchus, to go to his treasurer, and ask from him anything he wanted. The treasurer was surprised at the magnitude of the demand, and refused to pay it without first consulting the king, as he added : " It seemed too much for one man to receive." The king replied : " It is not too much for Alexander to give. He does honour to my riches and liberality by so large a request." So with our faithful covenant-keeping God : " He that spared not His own Son, but delivered Him up to death for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give us all things V (Rom. viii. 32). Dominion is also ascribed to Christ. " On His head are many crowns." Creation is His, for all things were created by Him and for Him. Providence is His, for of Him and through Him and to Him are all things. Grace is His — He opens and no man shuts. He shuts and 32 The Messages to the Seven Churches no man opens. He has the keys of death and Hades. He is Head over all things to His Church, which is His body, the fulness of Him that filleth all in all. And His are crowns of victory too. While He has do minion by right, He has it also by conquest. " His own right ihand and His holy arm hath gotten Himself the victory." He has triumphed over the world. He could say to His disciples, " Be of good cheer, I have overcome the world." The world which He has overcome is that which St. John has described as the " lust of the flesh, the lust of the eye, the pride of life," all of which presented to Him their tempt ing power, but in vain. " The prince of this world cometh and hath nothing in Me." He has vanquished Sin and Satan. He has spoiled Death of its power, and delivered them who, through fear of death, were all their lifetime sub ject to bondage. " His kingdom is an everlasting kingdom and His dominion endureth throughout all generations." The " stone " spoken of in Daniel ii. 45, " cut out of the mountain without hands," is yet destined to break in pieces every earthly sovereignty and fill all lands with glory. Even, so, blessed Jesus ! Thy name shall endure for ever : men shall be blessed in Thee : all nations shall call Thee blessed. " Let the whole earth be filled with Thy glory. Amen and Amen." Ver. 7. 'IBoi) epyerai p,eTd Ttov ve^eXwv, Kal oyfrerai avrov 7ra? 6daXp,oi, Kal oiTive<; aiirov i^eKevrrjaav, Kal KOifrovrai i-TT avrov trdaai, ai (pvXal t^? 77}?' val, dp.ijv. Behold He cometh with the clouds; and every eye sliall see Him, and they which pierced Him : and all the tribes of the earth shall mourn over Him. Even so, Amen. The Second Advent of our Lord Jesus Christ is here distinctly announced ; and, how ever much men may differ as to the time, manner, and circumstances of that great event, every section of the Chris- of Asia Minor. 33 tian Church admits it as a fact, and as an article of faith. It is the theme of the first prophet, for Enoch the seventh from Adam prophesied " The Lord cometh with ten thousands of His saints "; and St. John, the last inspired Apostle, begins and ends the Book of Revelation by directing attention to that sublime subject : " Behold He cometh with the clouds." In St. Luke we are told, " And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory." St. Matthew records our Lord's words : " Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power and com ing in the clouds of heaven " ; and we may believe our Lord in these two passages is appropriating to Himself the words of Daniel's prophecy (vii. 13) — "One like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of Days, and they brought Him near before Him, and there was given Him dominion, and glory, and a kingdom, that all people, nations, and languages, should serve Him." Can it be sup posed for a moment that these events have already had their fulfilment, as Hengstenberg has represented — that the coming with clouds was the fiery train in which Jerusalem was en veloped when destroyed by the overwhelming power of the Roman army ? Strauss has upheld this view from our Lord's words — " This yeved (race) shall not pass away till all be fulfilled " (Luke xxi. 32) — but with a different object, namely, that of discrediting our Lord's prophetic character. He renders the word 7evea as denoting a generation of thirty or forty years, and he says, if the words spoken by our Lord were true, the advent of Christ should have been shortly after His ascension. But if the word 76vea be examined, it will be seen to have no connection whatever with the destruction of Jerusalem, as it stands immediately connected with our Lord's Second Advent. Now instead of the word yeved de noting a generation, Stier renders it a race, nationality, class, - and by it he understands the Jewish race. Dean Alford also D 34 The Messages to the Seven Churches adopts the same view : (i) Because there is not one word in reference to the Jews, or Jerusalem, where this verse is intro duced. (2) Because in Matt. xxiv. 36, our Lord has said, " Of that day and hour knoweth no man," etc. If the word 761'ea meant the generation of men then living, our Lord must have announced the day, as the event would have taken place within the limits of a generation. (3) But long after Jerusalem had been destroyed and its inhabitants scattered to the four corners of the earth, the last surviving Apostle and the early Christians were still looking for the Second Advent. The Jewish race are still surviving, and their existence will be coeval with the fulfilment of our Lord's prophecy. Other races have mingled like streams in the great river of humanity ; the Jewish race have been persecuted, trampled upon and crushed, but like the bush which burned at Horeb, they have not been consumed. In their existence in the world, they stand as a living witness for the truth of Christ ianity ; and they await the great event, which is fast drawing nigh, when, like converging streams, they shall meet together, and greet the Messiah — whom they pierced — with their glad Hosannah to the Son of David, " Blessed is He that cometh in the name of the Lord." When our blessed Lord was about to leave the world, it is remarkable how much the Second Advent occupied His thoughts. Every object seemed to turn His attention in that direction. The goodly stones of the temple, the children crying in the temple, the fig-tree putting on its green leaves — all these spoke to Him of that event, and led Him to impress upon His disciples the need of watchfulness, and the duty on their part of waiting the development of God's plans, and marking the lines of Providence in His dealings with His Church ; and although He left them in uncertainty as regards the time of the end, they could look around them and see God's purposes ripening, and a succession of events of Asia Minor. 35 occurring which were all to lead to that grand consumma tion. To us who are living in the " last times," there is a con firmation of the faith which the Apostles had not. " Blessed are the eyes which see the things that ye see," may appro priately be applied to us. Glance at the course of Scripture prophecy, and surely there is much to awaken hope in those who look for and love the Saviour's appearing ; while, on the other hand, there is much to excite alarm in those who dread His coming. (i) Forty years had scarcely elapsed from the time of our Lord's ascension, when Jerusalem was destroyed, the temple burned, and its very foundations upturned — " one stone not left upon another," — and the Jews scattered through all lands, a hissing and a by-word among all nations, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. (2) We live in an age when we are witnessing the expiring throes of two great apostate systems, both of which arose together, and which were to exist side by side with the Church of God for 1260 prophetic years. (3) We iind, the gospel has been preached in many lands for a witness to man's condition, to God's unbounded mercy, to the fulness of Christ's atonement, to the inexcusableness of all before God. Within the last fifty years the gospel has been translated into upwards of two hundred languages and dialects spoken by 800,000,000 of mankind ; and we know that, when it is preached for a witness to all nations, then shall the end come. (4) We have seen, and are seeing daily before our eyes, iniquity abounding, the love of many waxing cold, scoffers walking after their own lusts, and saying, "Where is the promise of His coming, for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the world } " — men losing their belief in the supernatural, and regarding the world as governed by the iron law of necsssity. 36 The Messages to the Seven Churches This was not so in the past ; it belongs to, and is one special mark of, the age in which we live, not merely observed by the enthusiast in the study of prophecy, but by men who are remarkable for calm and sober views of Scriptural truth. "We are passing over an interval," says Canon Liddon, " which separates the religious past, whose opportunities have been too sadly neglected, from a future of pure secularism." ^ New forms of evil seem to multiply. Those three unclean spirits like frogs (Rev. xvi. 13), infidelity, secularism, and apostasy, are polluting the nations with their foul and offen sive touch, and the witnesses for God and His cause are but a little flock. When the Son of man comes will He find faith on the earth ? Men do not retain God in their knowledge ; they ignore Him, if they do not deny Him ; their lives are for the world alone, as if there was no account to render, as if there was^o retribution to apprehend. For the great event that is to come — we know not when, we know not how, except in so far as God hath revealed it — everything would appear to be in preparation, bidding God's people " to lift up their heads, for their redemption draweth nigh."- p^erd TWV ve(peXwv, with the clouds. As He passed away to heaven from the gaze of His astonished disciples, in like manner Christ shall come again. A cloud received Him from their sight, and now " behold He cometh with the clouds." This indicates the majesty arid glory with which the Second Advent shall be ushered in ; but the clouds with which He shall be surrounded rather bespeak terror than joy. They are symbols of wrath to sinners (Ps. xcvii. 2 ; xviii. 11). God is frequently represented as encompassed with the clouds as His chariot, and which contribute to veil from the eyes of men His awful majesty (Job xxii. 14 ; Isa. xix. i). While the return of Christ will bring joy and gladness to the hearts of His people, it will be a day of judgment and anguish for His , ' Canon Liddon's Sermons, vol. ii. p. 104. of Asia Minor. 2)7 enemies. Perhaps there is no more terrible expression in Holy Scriptur^e than "the wrath of the Lamb" (Rev. vi. i6). " Kiss the Son, lest He be angry, and ye perish from the way, when His wrath is kindled but a little. Blessed are all they that put their trust in Him " (Ps. ii. 12). Kal ot^eTai avrov trd'i o^daXp.o';, and every eye shall see Him. Not in any spiritual or transcendental sense shall Christ our King and Judge be seen ; but all who are alive at 1 His coming, as well as those who shall have a share in the 1 first resurrection, shall see Him — see Him as He was when, from the Mount of Olives, He left this earth, bearing in His body those marks of suffering which He carried with Him to heaven — those "wounds wherewith He was wounded in the house of His friends " (Zech. xiii. 6). Was not the seeing Christ what Job, the patriarch of Uz, so ardently longed for ? " Yet in my flesh shall I see God." I — this poor creaturely being, racked with pain, and weak with sores, brought down with infirmity and disease to the very dust, helpless, bereaved, alone — I shall see the Redeemer for myself, mine eyes shall behold Him, and not another (Job xix. 27). Every eye shall see Him, not " with visage marred more than any man, and His form more than the sons of men " — " an astonishment and a byword" (Deut. xxviii. 37) — so that those who saw Him were dumb with the amazement of scorn at one so abject claiming to be the Messiah ; but now He shall be seen coming as from Bozrah, travelling in the greatness of His strength, proclaiming Himself as He that speaks of righteousness, mighty to save those who trust in Him, while He will inflict judgment upon His enemies. It will be a day of judgment to the hostile Gentiles, as His first coming was to the unbe lieving Jews. Every eye shall see Him. Now the heavens have received Him ; He has entered within the veil, and as He has gone out of sight of bodily eye. He is forgotten and disowned. Men 38 The Messages to the Seven Churches live and act as if He was never to return, and as if there was no responsibility. They say, " God hath forgotten : He hideth His face. He will never see it" (Ps. x. ii). Life to them is a mystery ; death a leap in the dark. Eyes have they, but they see not. The god of this world hath blinded the minds of those who believe not ; and with capacities which if rightly made use of, with reason which ought to dignify them, with conscience— the eye of the soul— with all these high endow ments, they bring themselves to a level with the brutes that perish. If one would come back from the dead, they would believe— if some sign would be given, the ungodly world would be converted ; but no sign greater than what has been given will be afforded, until they shall see the sign of the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven, too late for their pardon and peace, too certain to bring dismay and disaster among the ranks of those who knew not the day of their visitation. Blessed are they who, having not seen yet have believed, who now in this their day can adopt the words of the Apostle of the Circumcision, when speaking of those who would be found unto praise, and honour, and glory, at the appearing of Jesus Christ : " Whom having not seen, ye love ; in whom, though now ye see Him not, yet believing, ye rejoice with joy un speakable and full of glory" (i Pet. i. 8). KoX oiTivei avTov i^eKevTtjaav, Kal K6-<^ovTai, k.t.X., and they which pierced Him, and all tlie tribes of the earth shall mourn over Him. There are two Old Testament prophecies relating to the circumstance of the piercing of Christ, viz. Ps. xxii. i6, and Zech. xii. lo. In the one, there is an allusion to the piercing of His hands and feet with the nails; in the other, ' there is a prophecy of the conversion of the Jews, when God shall turn the captivity of Zion and plant them in their own land, and when they shall look upon Him whom they pierced. St. John quotes the latter passage in his Gospel (xix. 37). "OyjrovTai et? ov i^eKevrrjaav. In the Hebrew it is -"npT of Asia Minor. 39 (dakaru), which is correctly rendered " pierced." The Septua gint version is here different ; KaTwpyf\aavTo is used, which signifies " danced for joy," or " insulted." The Jews pierced Christ not less by their cruel mockeries and insults than they did by the spear. As He listens to the taunts of the reckless multitude, and watches their malignant doings, how deeply must their bitter arrows have penetrated His soul, when He cried, " They that see Me laugh Me to scorn, they shoot out their lips, they shake their heads, saying. He trusted in the Lord that He would deliver Him ; let Him deliver Him if He delight in Him " (Ps. xxii. 8, comp. with Matt, xxvii. 42). But in Zechariah the words which St. John here refers to, and which are also alluded to in his Gospel, are connected with a gracious dispensation. They speak of repentance and a return to the Lord ; here, however, there does not appear to be any manifestation of grace, but rather a revelation of judgment and righteous indignation. The restoration of the Jews and their final conversion are clearly the subjects of prophecy ; and St. Paul in Romans xi. has shown that they shall occupy a prominent position, and serve an important purpose, in the future of the Church ; for " if the casting away of them be the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them be but life from the dead .''" (Rom. xi. 15). Except by way of adaptation, the words here can hardly apply to the Jews at all. All the tribes of the earth — irdaai ai (f)vXal t-^? 7^? — refer to the Gentile world, " the world that lieth in the evil one." Our Lord in the Gospel (Matt. xxiv. 30) has used these latter words in this connection, as indicative of the confusion and despair of unbelievers, when they shall see Him whom they slighted and rejected, coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory ; and we cannot doubt that the expression. All the tribes of the earth, includes all to whom the message of salvation has been offered in vain — all whose god is the world, whose treasure is here, whose hearts have 40 The Messages to the Seven Churches been detached from God, their true centre, and who have not set their affections on things above. They shall wail with remorse and despair, because the things belonging to their peace, once within their reach, are now hid for ever from their eyes. That the phrase the tribes of the earth bears this signification we may refer to St. Augustine (as quoted by Wordsworth), Serm. 57 : " Ecclesia Dei ccelum est, inimici Ejus terra sunt." The Church of God is heaven. His enemies are the earth. Nal, dp,rjv, even so, A men. This is not the expression of a wish on the part of St. John ; it is rather the affirmation » of a certainty. A double Amen — the one in Hebrew, the other in Greek. It is God's seal to the truth of these solemn statements of revelation, to assure us that though heaven and earth pass away. His word shall not pass away. God's promises and threatenings are unchangeable. If God is eternal, then what He proclaims as truth is eternal ; whether that truth is revealed in His word, or in the human conscience, it lasts ; it is above the water-floods of change. " Thy word, O Lord, endureth for ever in heaven." Ver. 8. '£!7(» etyiti to "AX^a Kal to fl, Xeyei Kvpio<; 6 ©eo? o wv, Kal 6 ?jv, Kal 6 ip-^op-evoi;, 6 iravTOKpaTwp, I am the Alpha and the Omega, saith the Lord God, wlio is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty. It would seem difficult to ascertain whether this designation. Alpha and 12, refers to God the Father, or God the Son, in the passage now before us, as the declaration is that of " the Lord the God," without any special adaptation to one person more than another of the Trinity. In verse 4, God the Father is spoken of by the very same terms which are here used, " who is, who was, and who is to come ; '' but as the Revelation is that of Jesus Christ, as He is the author of it (verse i), we may regard these words as spoken by Him. In verse 17, Christ calls Him.self the First of Asia Minor. 41 and the Last ; and in chapter ii. 8, the title is more definite still, for He adds, "which was dead, and lived again." In chapters xxi. 6, and xxii. 1 3, the expression. Alpha and 12 is » applied by our Lord Jesus Christ to Himself; and as it is thus used in other portions of the Revelation in regard to Christ, we may also consider it as applicable here. There is, however, the designation, 6 ep^o/tevo?, who is to come, which must be ^ taken to convey a different meaning from 6 iaopi.evo^, who shall be ; and surely it was not without some intention that the one word was used instead of the other. The Coming One is the theme, the subject and substance of the book, and can only refer to the Second Advent of our Lord Jesus Christ. ' With it the book begins, with it it ends. The Alpha of the Old Testament was laid in Paradise lost, the Omega of the New is in Paradise regained. Alpha and 12, as applied to Christ, is a proof of His Godhead. He is the initial cause, as well as the end of all creation. The Jewish Rabbins use to speak of the commencement and end of a thing as being from K to /I ; and the use of the Greek letters, instead of the Hebrew, would indicate the universality of the Gospel dispen sation, the revelation of the mystery which was from all ages hid in Christ. The beginning and end of all things is Christ, as He was at the starting-point of all time. " In the begin ning was the Word." At a point when time was not, when as yet the orbs of space were uncreated, Jesus Christ existed, not irapd tw @ew, along with God, but tt/so? tov Qeov, with » God, in close and constant communion. iv dp'xv- In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth, iv dpxfi- In the beginning was the Word. Do these refer to the same point of time ? Certainly not. We may • regard the act of creation as occurring at the initial moment of time ; but the iv dpxu ^^ ° X670? goes back beyond our • conceptions of time to the aeons of past duration — and then was the Logos existing, everlastingly present with God. The 42 The Messages to the Seven Churches Word was God ; and if so, how can we conceive of His being God, and other than eternal .'' ^ " This declaration of Christ concerning Himself, ' I am the Alpha and the i2,' was reverently accepted," says Wordsworth, " by early Christian art, and is often seen in ancient inscrip tions, particulariy in the catacombs of Rome, where the symbols A and i2 are frequently accompanied by the well- known monogram of Christos, ^. In one case the symbol is accompanied with the words ES DEIS, probably DEUS, ' Thou art God,' asserting the Godhead of Christ." "- The use of the definite articles prefixed to the A and i2 clearly shows that Christ is the only beginning and end of all things, and that beside Him there is no other, a distinct proof of the co-equality and co-eternity of Christ with the Father (Isa. xii. 4 ; xliv. 6 ; xlviii. 1 2). 6 wv, b rjv, Kal 6 ipxbp-evo<;, the existing one. He who was, and He who is to come. Christ's names here with the article before each may be regarded as proper. The 6 wv, k.t.X., correspond with the Hebrew Tf\TV, and reminds us of the description given by the Angel of the Lord who appeared to Moses at Horeb in the bush. He who is at once God and His Angel is Christ; and when Moses asked God His name, God said, 'Eyw et/tt o "flv, and 6 "flv sent me'to you. " This is My name for ever, and this is My memorial unto all generations." From this it appears that Christ's name from eternity was 6 V2i', or the Existing One (John i. 18; vi. 46). Christ then is 6 wv in His unity with God from everlasting ; He is o ^v after His incarnation, and 6 €'jO%6ju,6vo?, in His Second Advent as our King and Judge. r 6 ¦jravTOKpaTwp, the Almighty. Excepting in 2 Cor. vi. 18, a quotation from Isaiah, this word does not occur in any part of the New Testament besides the Revelation, where ' See Canon Liddon's Bampton Lectures, p. 226. 2 Bp. Wordsworth, on Rev., p. 168. of Asia Minor. 43 it is found in iv. 8 ; xi. 17 ; xix. 6 ; and xxi. 22. It is correctly rendered " Almighty." The Hebrew words corre sponding to it are '•'71^ (Shaddai), TiytXlt nini (Jehovah Sabaoth), the one indicative of the power with which God works, and the other the instrumentality with which He executes that power. All power in heaven and earth be longs to Christ ; He can therefore save His people under every circumstance, and scatter His enemies, like the dust before the wind. As He is the Omnipotent Lord God, there need be no discouragement to His suffering people, or any doubt that what He has purposed shall come to pass. Christ's dominion was to be universal ; His kingdom an everlasting kingdom, and of His dominion and government there should be no end. The powers of the world were then directed against His Church in the person of His persecuted Apostle, but His name is 6 iravTOKpdrwp, the Almighty — " I am the Lord, I change not," I ever live, and what I have spoken shall stand from generation to genera tion. " Unto the Son God saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever " (Heb. i. 8). DIVINE COMMISSION AND VISION. Chap. i. 9-20. 9 'E7iavT}v -iJTis iXdXei /leT ifiov' Kal i-iriaTpi^j/as eXSov i-TTTci Xv%vlas xpvo-ds' 13 Kai iv piffifi TUIV iirTh Xvxvi.uv op,oiov Tiip dvdpdmov ivSeSvpiivov iroS-Z/pri, Kal Trepiet^ojo-pivov Trphs rois ^aCTols ^iinn)V xp^o-ijv. 14 'H 5^ Ke^aX^ airrov Kai al Tplxes XevKoX us Ipiov XevKov, lis x"'"' fai oi 6^&aX/xoi aiiroD us ^Xo^ irvpds, 15 Kai oi irSSes avTov Sp.0101 xaXKoXL^dvcp, us iv Kap.lv

o§ov' iyib elp,L 6 irpuTOS Kal 6 ^axaTos, 18 Kai 6 ^uv, Kai iyev6p,7jv veKpbs, Kai Idod ^v elp,i. els tovs aluvas tuv altavuv Kai *exo> Tds KXels tov BavdTov koX tov q,dov. 19 Tpd^ov oSv & eldes, Kai d elirt,, Kai & /lAXet ylveffdai ^tterd TavTa. 20 T6 p.vffT'^pLov TUV e-iTTd daripuv Siv eXSes iiri ttjs Se^ids p^ov, Kai rds iirrd Xvxvias Tds x/jwffds. Oi eTrrd dcTTipes, dyyeXoL tuv i-jrTa iKKXea-iuv eltri' Kai Xvxvlai al iiTTd, iiTTd iKKXf^fflat elal. 9 I John, your brother, and partaker with you in the tribulation, and kingdom and patience which are in Christ Jesus, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and the testimony of Jesus Christ. 10 I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and I heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet, , II Saying, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it to the seven churches ; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamum, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea. 12 And I turned to see the voice which spake with me. And having turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks : 13 And in the midst of the seven candlesticks one like the Son of man, clothed with a long garment reaching down to his feet, and girt about at the breasts with a golden girdle. 14 And his head and his hair were white as white wool, as snow ; and his eyes were as a flame of fire ; 15 And his feet like unto burnished brass, as if they burned in a furnace ; and his voice as tlie voice of many waters. 16 And he had in his right hand seven stars : and out of his mouth proceeded a sharp twoedged sword : and his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength. 17 And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as one dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying. Fear not ; I am the first and the last, 18 And the Living one ; and I was dead ; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, and I have the keys of death and of Hades. 19 Write therefore the things which thou sawest, and the things which are, and the things which shall come to pass hereafter ; 20 The mystery of the seven stars which thou sawest in my right hand, and the seven golden candlesticks. The seven stars are the angels of the seven churches : and the seven candlesticks are seven churches. 46 DIVINE COMMISSION AND VISION. Ver. 9. 'Eyw 'Iwdvvrj<;, 6 dBeXo'; vp,wv, I John, your brother — not, I John, the Apostle, the privileged disciple, who had been an eyewitness of the transfiguration ; who had been at the last supper, at Gethsemane, and at the cross ; to whose care the Saviour of the world committed His mother in His last agony, and who had been one of the earliest to see the risen Redeemer on the morning of His resurrection day— but, I John, your brother in Christ Jesus— one who has become partaker of the Divine nature, being born again by the Holy of Asia Minor. 49 Ghost, — who am a member of the same household of faith, a sharer with you in all your joys and sorrows, your trials and triumphs, and who now identify myself with the suffering Church. The Roman orator once said,^ "I am a man, and whatever relates to man cannot be a matter of indifference to me ; " so here the last surviving Apostle, no longer looking for a seat on the right hand or the left hand in an earthly kingdom, is content to style himself a brother in adversity, happier in his exile than Caesar on the throne of the world. He was then doing the will of his heavenly Father, and like his Lord and Master, by the things he suffered he was learn ing obedience, establishing his claim to be one of Christ's " brethren," and, as such, the brother of all who are united to Christ in the bonds of the Gospel. KoX avyKoivwvo to Ephesus, he was induced to write his Gospel concerning the Divinity of Christ co-eternal with the Father, in which he refutes the heretics, Cerinthus, and the Nicolaitans, and the Ebionites, who denied that Christ had existed before Mary.^ All these writers show that, for the faithful testimony which St. John bore to the word of God and to the Lord Jesus Christ, he was exiled to the isle that is called Patmos. Irenaeus further states that, after the death of Domitian, St. John returned from Patmos to Ephesus, where he lived to the reign of Trajan, and died at Ephesus in the sixty-eighth year after our Lord's crucifixion.* ev Trj vrjatp ry KaXovp,evrj UaTp^w, in the island that is called Patmos. This island was one of a group in the wfEgean Sea called Sporades, and was situated about 30 miles south of Samos, and 60 miles S.W. of Ephesus. It was so small , and insignificant that it was httle known in St. John's. day, and we can therefore understand the particularity with which he describes it—" the island that is called Patmos." It ' Euseb., Chron., lib. ii. ad Olymp. 218. ' St. Jerome, Ep. 87, 3 Iren., v. 30, 3. ¦* •^''««-. "• 22, S- 54 The Messages io the Seven Churches was a rugged, bare and rocky island, about 8 miles long by one mile broad, and 15 miles in circumference, without cultivation, except in small patches among the rocks, and possessing but few inhabitants. Victorinus, bishop and martyr, at the close of the third century, tells us that, when John saw the Apocalypse, he was in the island of Patmos, being condemned by Domitian Cffisar to the mines there; and that when John, on account of his old age, supposed he would have a release by death, Domitian was slain, and his decrees were rescinded, and John was liberated from the mines.i Condemnation to the mines wcts the punishment inflicted upon criminals of the worst sort ; and it has been considered that banishment was the only punishment St. John suffered, as there is no allusion by any of the early writers, except Victorinus, to the circumstance of the Apostle's working in the mines. Amongst the Romans, transportation was a common punishment.^ Patmos is now called Patmo, or Patmosa, and has a town called Patmos, with a harbour and some monasteries of Greek monks ; and on the side of the hill on which the town is built, a natural grotto is shown in a rock, where St. John is said to have seen his visions and to have written the Revelation. Domitian thought to silence the Apostle, and crush the infant Church, by sending the aged president of the Church at Ephesus into exile, but in vain did the waves of persecution beat against the ark of God, because God was upholding it. And in that lonely island of Patmos, where the Apostle was cut off from all means of usefulness, where no longer he could go up to the house of God with them who kept holy day, where no longer he could teach the faithful flock at Ephesus the great truths of Christianity with that Apostolic authority and love for which he was so remarkable, he was not left comfortless. ' Victorinus, in Apoc. x. 1 1, quoted by Woi-dsworth. "^Juvenal, i. 73. Tacit., Aimed., i. 39. of Asia Minor. 55 In his retirement and banishment he had a work to do for • God, greater perhaps than what he could have done at Ephesus ; he had to record the closing scenes of Revelation, the last words of Christ to mankind, until that day when we shall no longer see in a mirror dimly, but behold our Saviour face to face, when He shall come again, to be glorified in His saints, and to be admired in all them that believe. And is it not so that in our own experience we have often found that, when deprived of those earthly stays on which 1 we have been leaning, and when the gourd which we looked upon as " a shadow to our heads to deliver us from our grief," has been removed, the Lord Himself has come to us and whispered in our ears, " Fear not, for I am with thee " 1 Our earthly joys are often like the incoming wave which breaks upon the shore, while our sorrows are like the wave which recedes, carrying us out to the great ocean of Godhead, and making us cling more firmly to Him who is " the same yesterday, to-day, and for ever." Ver. 10, II. 'Eyevop/Tjv iv Hvevp^art iv t-t} KvpiaK-rj rjfiepa' Kal rjKovaa oiriaw fiov ^wvfjv pieydXrjV w? aaXTnyyo';, Xeyovarji' *0 ySXeTrei? ypdi^ov et? ^i^Xiov, Kal irep.'^ov Tat? "eTTTa iKKXrj- aiaii;, et? "E^eaov, Kal et? Sp,vpvav, Kal et? IIepyap,ov, Kal et? ©vdreipav, Kal ei'; SdpSeiv, Kal et? ^iXaBeX4>eiav, Kal et? AaoBiKeiav. I was in the Spirit on the Lord's day, and T heard behind me a great voice, as of a trumpet, saying, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it to the seven churches ; unto Ephesus, and unto Smyrna, and unto Pergamum, and unto Thyatira, and unto Sardis, and unto Philadelphia, and unto Laodicea. 'Eyevop-rjv iv Hvevp^ari, I became in tJu Spirit. He became a dweller in Patmos, and while there he became supernaturally influenced. His mental and spiritual faculties were so re moved from the regions of time and sense, that he was, as it 56 The Messages to the Seven Churches were, transported out of himself. Like St. Paul, whether in . the body or out of the body he could not tell. We call this transition a state of trance, or ecstasy. In the case of St. Paul, that extraordinary rapture to the third heaven, which he » speaks of in 2 Cor. xii. 2, was vouchsafed when he was about to enter upon his great mission as the Apostle of the Gentiles, probably because he was to labour more abundantly, and endure more humiliation, afifliction and suffering, than the rest of the Apostles ; and to strengthen him for the work before him, it was needful he should have visions from the Lord, so that, amid all his trials and sorrows, he could look upward and say : " For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us " (Rom. viii. 1 8). In like manner, St. John describes himself as being carried out of himself, and becoming the subject of distinct supernatural manifestations — of hearing things not to be kept secret, and seeing things which were not to be concealed — but he was privileged to see the vision in order that he might record it for the benefit of the Church, and that his faith might be strengthened in those dark and lonely hours of exile he was called upon to endure for the sake of his Lord and Master. As his day, so should his strength be ; and as the sufferings of Christ were abundant in him, so his consolation was made to abound by Christ. iv TTj KvpiaKTJ rjpiipa, on the Lords day. Not the Day of the Lord as some would interpret it, because if such a meaning were attached to the expression, it would suppose St. John was carried in some extraordinary manner to the Day of Judgment, and the scenes with which its advent would be accompanied, and that on that day when the Church on earth would be exchanged for the Church in heaven, he was to write certain Epistles to seven Churches in Asia Minor ! There are only two places in the New Testament where the word rj KvpiaKrj occurs, namely here, rj KvpiaKrj rjp,epa, and i Cor. of Asia Minor. 5 7 xi. 20, KvpiaKov BeiTTvov. When the Day of the Lord is spoken of it is always '^p,epa Kvpiov that is used. The Lord's day, or the day belonging to the Lord, is some day that He has specially made His own by some signal act, and properly applies to the day of our Lord's resurrection. It was the day on which He was declared to be the Son of God with power by the resurrection from the dead (Rom. i. 4). It was His resting day, because on that day the work of atonement had been for ever completed. The day of Christ's incarnation or His passion could not be called by the name, the Lord's day, because He had yet to labour before He entered into His rest ; nor could the day of His ascension be called the Lord's day, for by His ascension He only entered into His place of rest. He having by His resurrection already entered into His state of rest ; so that the first day of the week, or Christian sabbath, has, ever since the morning of His resurrection, been designated the Lord's day. Christ arose from the dead on the first day of the week. Twice he appeared tb His disciples on that day; on that day He gave special evi dence of His resurrection ; on that day He gave first the earnest of the Spirit, and afterwards poured out upon His Church the full effusion of the Holy Ghost on the day of Pentecost, which was the fiftieth day after the Passover, as we find in Lev. xxiii. 16, where it is said, the morrow after the seventh sabbath is the fiftieth day ; and on the first day of the week the Apostles and early Christians were accustomed to meet for religious worship and "breaking of bread." In Acts XX. 7, we read that " on the first day of the week, when the disciples came together to break bread, Paul preached to them." Now we find in verse 6, that he had already been seven days with the disciples at Troas, yet on none of the seven are we told they met for public worship, but on the first day of the week only. For all these reasons, the day on which St. John was in the Spirit was the first day 58 The Messages to the Seven Churches of the week, or Lord's day. It was known as such when St. John wrote the Revelation, and we find that on that day it was customary for the disciples to meet together for the reception of Holy Communion and for hearing the word of ' God. Justin Martyr, in his Apology, i. 85, says : " On the day called Sunday, our common assembly of all who are in the cities and the country is held, and we read the writings of the apostles and the books of the prophets." Then, after describ ing the sermon, the administration of Holy Communion, and the collection of alms for the poor, he adds " We all assemble together in common on the day called Sunday, because it is the day on which God created the world out of darkness and vXrj, and on which Jesus Christ our Saviour arose from the dead ; for on the day before Saturday they crucified Him, and on the day after Saturday He arose from the grave, and taught His apostles and disciples those things which we have delivered to you." St. Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch, who was a martyr in the reign of Trajan, desires • those to whom he wrote to " keep the Lord's day, on which our ) Life arose," ^ and St. Barnabas, his contemporary, says, " We observe the eighth day with gladness in which Jesus rose from I the dead." ^ And Eusebius bears testimony to the first day of the week as the Lord's day, when he writes : " The Logos (Christ) by the new covenant translated and transferred the feast of the sabbath to the morning light, and gave us the symbol of true rest, the saving Lord's day, the first day of the week. On this day we do those things, according to the spiritual law, which were decreed for the priests to do on the sabbath ; all things proper to do on the sabbath we have trans ferred to the Lord's day. . . . it is delivered to us that we should meet on this day."* It was then the day of our Lord's resurrection, the first day of the week, that St. John was privi- ' S. Ignat., ad Magnes., sec. 9. 2 S. Barnab,, Ep., c. xv. 3. ' Euseb., H. E., iv. 23, 8. of Asia Minor. 59 leged to enjoy that marvellous manifestation which he after wards describes ; and therefore the observance of that day for religious worship has both the authority of Christ and Apostolic sanction. St. John did not forget the claims of the Lord's day in his lonely exile, and as he honoured God, God honoured him. That day for the Apostle, as it should ever be for us, was the Day of days. It taught him that the resurrec tion power of Christ was the guarantee for the efficacy of His sacrifice and the salvation of His people, to the end of time. It told him that Christ lives to intercede, and, because He lives, we shall live also ; it poured a flood of light upon the Garden and the Cross, and pointed to the rest that remaineth for the people of God. Well might he take up the words of Psalm cxviii. and say, " This is the day which the Lord hath made ; we will rejoice and be glad in it." Kai rjKovaa oiricrw p,ov, k.t.X., and f heard behind m,e a great voice as of a trumpet. When in that state of ecstasy in which his bodily and mental existence were merged in the spiritual, he heard a great voice, as of a trumpet, to summon his attention, and gradually prepare him for what he was now to see. He had in his early days been familiar with the sound of the trumpet, which the priests were accustomed to use, in publishing the approach of festivals, or giving the signals of war. The first day of every month was sacred to the Jews, and was announced by the sound of a trumpet. Every solemn festival and every public assembly was introduced by the deep ' sound of a trumpet as recorded in Numbers x. 10; and perhaps as this sound was so familiar to St John, he makes use of it to describe the character of that voice which he heard behind him. In Psalm xxix. the voice of the Lord is compared to the loud thunder peal, and therefore it may be said to be a great voice. The trumpet is alluded to as calling the dead to judg ment (Matt. xxiv. 31 ; I Cor. xv. 52 ; i Thess. iv. 16). The object of that loud and thrilling voice which the Apostle 6o The Messages to the Seven Churches heard could not be mistaken, and he proceeds to tell us the instruction he received. Xeyovarji- *0 /SXcTrei?, ypd-^ov, k.t.X., saying, What thou seest, write in a book, etc. The revised New Testament properly omits the words, " I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last," which words are not in the Greek text, and must have found their place in any copy in which they are inserted, by the carelessness of transcribers. The things that thou now seest, write at once (ypdyfrov) into a book. The word ^i^Xiov means a roll or scroll, books having been written in ancient times in that form ; and even still the Jews use rolls in their synagogues. Various materials were used for writing before the invention of paper. Parchment, •n-epydixrjvrj, takes its name from Pergamum (the seat of one of the seven Churches of Asia Minor), and was invented by the kings of that place, because the kings of Egypt refused to allow the exportation of papyrus out of their dominions, as they were jealous of any imitation of their great library at Alexandria. Hesiod's works were written on leaden tablets ; the laws of Solon on wooden planks ; and the moral law, which God delivered to Moses, on tables of stone. St. John was enjoined to write immediately upon a roll what he saw, and we may therefore believe the vision was recorded by hiir while he was in Patmos. But why enjoined to be written } Might not the Apostle have been the sole guardian of that Revelation, and have dispensed a knowledge of it to the "Angels" ofthe seven Churches from time to time, as they were able to receive it, so that they might communicate it to the people 1 If there is any meaning in this direction given to St. John, it is that all possibility of change or error, in the lapse of time, should be prevented, and that the Churches should not be left to the uncertain voice of tradition, in ascertaining the knowledge of God's will. Why were the tables of stone delivered to Moses .' That Divine truth might of Asia Minor. 6i be preserved, and handed down to future generations. Why were the books of the New Testament ordered to be written ? " These are written that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ the Son of God, and that, believing, ye might have life through His name " (John xx. 31). Jren^us says : " We know not the dispensing of our salvation through any others than those by which the gospel came to us ; what they then preached, afterwards indeed by the will of God they delivered to us in the Scriptures, to be the ground and pillar of our faith."! St. Augustine also adds his testimony in a similar manner : " Therefore since they have written what He (Christ) made known and spoke, it is by no means to be said that He did not write Himself, since His members performed that which they knew by the dictation of the Head ; for whatsoever He wished us to read concerning His deeds and words, this He commanded to be written by them, or by His members." * The word was written that the faith might be preserved and that no admixture of error should be permitted to enter into God's revealed will. And to St. John, the last surviving Apostle, was made the final communication of that will, not for himself alone ; but he was commanded to write it in a book — that in future ages we, through patience and comfort of the Scriptures, might have hope. To him the eventful history of the Church in her trials and triumphs was disclosed, and by him recorded as a chart to guide her through the ocean of the world, in the dark midnight of time. The distinction therefore between the written and unwritten word is un- » tenable. If tradition contradict the word of God, it must be ' rejected ; if it agree with it, it is useless. What has not been . committed to writing must, in the lapse of centuries, have lost " much of its original character, and would therefore be a very . ' Adv. Hares., lib. xi. c. 47. ' Aug., de Consensu Evang., lib i., cap. ult. 62 The Messages to the Seven Churches unsafe guide to depend upon. Even in the written word we find interpolations and omissions, the insertion of side notes in the text, and various readings of many passages. If it was hard to preserve in its integrity what was written, how much more difficult to keep, with any degree of trustworthiness, what was unwritten. Never can we forget the withering re buke given by our Lord to the Pharisees and scribes : " Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition. In vain do they worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men " (Mark. vii. 7, 9). What thou seest, write in a book. What things were to be written t Evidently all the vision that the Apostle saw ; not merely the things contained in chapters ii. and iii., but the whole of the Revelation. The seven Churches were not only to have the advantage of those special Epistles that were addressed to them ; but the entire Revelation which Christ was pleased to show to His servant John. The seven Churches were as much concerned in knowing the whole book, as they were in being made acquainted with the mes sages sent to them. Just as the Epistles addressed to these Churches were not for them alone, but for all Churches — " He that hath an ear let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the Churches '' — so the unveiling of the mind of God in regard to the Church, through the centuries which were to pass, concerned the Asiatic Churches as much as it does ourselves. It gave them the same hopes, comforts, and consolations in their sufferings and sorrows as it has afforded to Christians in every age, making earthly things fade away by reason of " the glory that excelleth," and opening to the enraptured vision that bright world where faith and hope and patient waiting for Christ, shall have their full and perfect consummation. The things that St. John was to write are enumerated in verse 19 : " The things which thou hast seen, the things that are, and the things which shall be hereafter." " The things which of Asia Minor. 63 thou hast seen" are clearly those referred to in verse 11, and are identical with "the things that are, and that shall be hereafter." Dean Alford is hardly justified in construing the Kal d eia-i to mean " what things they signify " ; because the ' a etcrt are clearly put in contrast with a p.eXXei yiveadai. ' Bishop Wordsworth also takes the same view as Alford. He says : " St. John was not only admitted to see, and en abled to describe, the mysteries of the spiritual world and of futurity, but also to explain them." What thou seest, St. John ' was to write in a book, and this vision was to include the things that are — the present condition of the Churches, and * what should be the future disclosures of God's Providence in « relation to His Church till the end of time. KoX rrkp/^ov Tat? CTTTa iKKXrjaiai<; k.t.X., and send it to the seven churches, etc. Why these seven Churches were selected to the exclusion of others in the same region, such as Tralles, Magnesia, Miletus, Hierapolis, and Colossae, we have no means of ascertaining satisfactorily. We may conjecture, and offer some reasons which may occur to us as guiding this selec tion ; but, at best, the solution of this difficult question must only be considered as probable, (i) The number seven is typical and representative, and is used to denote complete ness and universality. So St. Augustine writes : " Numero septenario Universae Ecclesiae significata est plenitudo : prop ter quod et Joannes Apostolus ad septem scribit Ecclesias, eo modo se ostendens ad unius plenitudinem scribere." ^ It has been observed that St. Paul wrote seven Epistles to» Gentile Churches, and in doing so, he wrote to all. So in the Revelation seven Epistles are written to seven specified Churches, and all Churches are addressed. (2) There may have been in these Churches certain fea tures or characteristics which would be observable in the Church of Christ in every age, and in directing attention to 1 Aug., de Civ. Dei, xvii. 4. 64 The Messages to the Seven Churches them, whether by way of approval or censure, they would afford a beacon light through all time, either to warn of danger, or to guide in safety into the desired haven. This may account for Churches of lesser note having been addressed, while those of more importance were omitted. If we may suppose the condition of these several Churches to embrace all the marks of faithfulness or unfaithfulness, of vitality or decay, of earnest zeal or hollow indifference, of spiritual progress or hopeless retrogression, then it will be clear that, in selecting these Churches, the great Head of the Church designed to impart a lesson which might be learned with profit in every age. (3) That such was His design, we have only to examine the state of the seven Churches addressed. Ephesus is addressed first, being the capital of Proconsular Asia, nearest to Patmos, and the Church which had been presided over by St. John himself. It was marked chiefly for its intolerance of evil, and of those who said they were Apostles and were not ; but it was censured because it had left its first love. Smyrna was a seaport town of Ionia, about forty miles north of Ephesus. The " Angel " of the Church of Smyrna, Christian history informs us, was Polycarp, the disciple of St. John. The commendations given to the Angel of the Church of Smyrna agree well with this fact, for in the entire Epistle there is not a word of censure, but, on the contrary, the highest praise for patience and faithfulness during a period of persecution. Pergamum, now called Bergama, was a city of Mysia, one of the most renowned of Asiatic cities, once the residence of King Eumenes, and of other Attalic princes. The Church in that place was first praised for constancy and firmness in hold ing fast the faith in the midst of fearful persecution ; yet there is censure, because she kept within her communion certain of Asia Minor. 65 persons of corrupt lives and erroneous doctrine — Balaamites or Nicolaitans, who were a stumbling-block to weak brethren, and a disgrace to the Christian profession. Thyatira was in Lydia, and is first mentioned in the Acts , of the Apostles, xvi. 14, as the city to which Lydia, who was converted by the preaching of St. Paul, belonged. The Church of Thyatira is addressed in terms of praise and blame ; her faith, works, patience, and charity, are all recognised ; but having permitted the false prophetess to seduce many, she is called upon to repent, or, if not. He whose eyes were as a flame of fire and whose feet were as fine brass, would visit her transgressions with the rod, and her iniquity with stripes. Sardis, the ancient capital of Croesus and the Lydian kings 1 was situated at the foot of Mount Tmolus, on a plain watered by the river Pactolus, whose waters are said to have carried in their current golden sands, the source of the immense riches amassed by these potentates. The Church of Sardis was characterized by its members having a high name while they were spiritually dead. Spi ritual declension was everywhere apparent, and the Church is reproached for backsliding, apathy, and hypocrisy. High in reputation among the other Churches, He who searcheth the heart and trieth the reins of the children of men, weighs her in the balance and finds her wanting — her pro fession no better than "the sounding brass or tinkling cymbal." Philadelphia, the sixth in order of the Churches here named, was situated in the province of Lydia, and so called from Attains Philadelphus, king of Pergamum, by whom the city was founded. It stood on a lower slope of Mount Tmolus, about 28 miles S.E. of Sardis. This city was; greatly subject to earthquakes. The Church of Philadelphia receives unmixed praise. She had little strength, and in a time of severe trial was faithful in keeping Christ's word ; and F 66 The Messages to the Seven Churches an open door of usefulness was set before this Church by Christ Himself. Laodicea was in Phrygia, and was so called from Laodice, wife of Antiochus II. It was not far from Colosse, and was watered by the river Lycus. Its ancient name was Diospolis, afterwards Rhaos, and lastly Laodicea; a great commercial city. The Church here was rich in its own estimate, " having need of nothing," and is characterized by want of zeal in the cause of Christ, and a lukewarmness which our Lord condemns in the strongest terms, preferring even the want of religious profession to that condition which is described as being "neither cold nor hot." In Apostolic times this I Church had Archippus (Col. iv. 17) as its bishop, who was also a martyr in the cause of Christ. In all these Churches we see every condition of spiritual vigour and decay illustrated, and if we could , only realize the ideal of a perfect Church, it would be by eliminating the defects, errors, and infirmities, for which these several Churches are censured, and combining the virtues and excel lencies for which they are praised — blending, as the seven prismatic colours are united in a ray of pure light, all those % varied qualities of spirituality, zeal, love, patience, faithfulness, perseverance, and service, which constitute the household of God what the Psalmist has so appositely designated it — " the Perfection of Beauty " (Ps. 1. 2). Ver. 12. Kat eirearpeylra ^Xeireiv Trjv Xo^ Trupo?, and His head and His hair were white as white wool, as snow; and His eyes were as a flame of fire. The description here given corresponds exactly with that which Daniel gives of the Ancient of Days (Dan. vii. 9, x. 6), and which would seem to indicate eternal duration, or perhaps more properly to ex press the glory of Christ's Godhead. We can hardly regard this whiteness, which the Apostle desires to intensify by selecting wool and snow as its symbols, to be indicative of age, or of the decay which accompanies it ; for this would be inadmissible in speaking of Him who is from everlasting to everlasting, with whom one day is as a thousand years and a of Asia Minor. 75 thousand years as one day, who gathers as into a point all the duration of human history, and who is the mighty centre of two eternities. Solomon speaks of the hoary head as a crown of glory, and it is always associated with honour and respect But we must attach some other meaning to the appearance here described, as it would be an incongruity to apply the symbol of age to one who had just risen from the dead, and who would be in the full vigour of youth and im mortality. In Christ there could be neither weakness nor decay, for as the Psalmist in the i loth Psalm, when alluding to the Messiah as the Ruler of His people in the Gospel dis pensation, says, " Thou hast the dew of Thy youth," thus showing that Christ's strength and activity continue unim paired, refreshed and renewed by the dew of God's grace and Spirit ; or that His body is constantly refreshed and strength ened by successive accessions of people, as dew from the morning. The angel at the sepulchre, as described by St. Mark (xvi. 5), is spoken of as a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment ; how much more then are youth and vigour applicable to Him who is the angels' Lord .' The head and hair white as wool and snow would properly recall the transfiguration scene, when His face did shine as the sun, and His raiment white as the light; St. Mark says, " exceeding white as snow." If the transfiguration scene foreshadowed His glory After His decease, St. John, who had been an eye-witness of that scene, must have had it vividly impressed upon his memory ; and now that the Lord appears to him with all the brightness, radiance, and intense splendour which he had observed on Hermon, he must have had no difficulty in recognising his risen and ascended Saviour, and in fully understanding what the transfiguration was intended to convey. He is the specially favoured Apostle,, and while St. Peter and St. James were admitted to one glimpse of the heavenly glory, he was privileged to have the vision repeated 76 The Messages to the Seven Churches for his special support and encouragement in Patmos. In the days of His flesh, Christ had given him a manifestation of the glory of His Divine Person, to prepare him for the dark scenes of His sufferings and of His death; now the glory of the risen and exalted Saviour is again brought before him to quicken his faith and strengthen his hope, when banished from the Church he loved, and to make him feel that " though persecuted he was not forsaken, cast down, he was not destroyed," — that, in the hour of his deepest gloom, there was One present who could say, " Fear not, for I am with thee." KoiX oi 6cf)6aX/jiol avrov, k.t.X., and His eyes were as a flame of fire. This indicates the powerful, penetrating, all- searching glance of Christ, to whom all hearts are open, all desires known, and from whom no secrets are hid. "All things are naked and opened to the eyes of Him with whom we have to do." In the address to the Church at Thyatira (Rev. ii. 18) this attribute of Christ is alluded to, and is there designed to inspire awe by the thought that nothing can be concealed from His view; indeed, in ii. 23, He explains the purport of the symbol here used by saying, " And all the Churches shall know that I am He which searcheth the reins and the hearts." But the words of this passage show not merely that Christ's eyes are so searching that nothing can escape His notice; they have a still deeper meaning, and a more judicial application. Fire, in most places where it is mentioned in Scripture, is indicative of indignation and wrath against sin. Perhaps the only exception is where our Lord is spoken of as baptizing with the Holy Ghost and with fire ; there indicating the descent of the Holy Ghost at Pentecost in tongues of fire. "Eyes, as a fiame of fire," signify that withering condemnation of sin to which He, who is of purer eyes than to behold iniquity, always in dealing with Churches or individuals gives expression. Sin cannot stand in His of Asia Minor. 77 presence, and wherever it appears it calls forth His righteous indignation. In this case the adversaries of the Church were Domitian and the power of heathen Rome ; and those Eyes, which the Apostle compares to a flame of fire, were indicative of retribution against that power, and of the speedy overthrow of the Church's enemies. In chapter xix. 11, 12, where Christ is represented as "judging and making war" upon His enemies, it is imme diately added in connection with that execution of judgment, " His eyes are as a flame of fire." Ver. 15. Kal oi iroSe? avTOv o/ioioi "xaXKoXi^avw w? ev Kap,ivw Treirvpwp.evoi, Kal rj ijjwvrj avrov w? (pwvrj vBdrwv iroXXwv, and His feet like unto burnished brass, as if they burned in a furnace ; and His voice as the voice of many waters. In Daniel's vision -by the river Hiddekel (x. 6) He whom he saw, who was clothed in linen, and whose loins were girt with fine gold of Uphaz, and whose eyes were as lamps of fire, had arms and feet like in colour to polished brass ; and in Ezekiel's vision (i. 7) the feet of the living creatures "sparkled like the colour of burnished brass." The word ¦XaXKoXi^dvw has afforded scope for much investigation by critics, as its etymology is involved in doubt. It occurs only twice in the New Testament, and in both places in the Revelation ; here, and in ii. i8. We know that ;;^a\A:o? means brass, but what Xi^av6<; means is the difficulty. Per haps it corresponds to the Hebrew ]^b, to be white ; but to what the allusion is there is a variety of opinion. As St. John has clearly in view the description given by Daniel, we may be safe in following the Hebrew analogy, and construe the word as meaning shining brass, or molten brass in a state of incandescence in a furnace. The light from brass molten in a furnace is insupportable, and it may be fitly used as an image of that dazzling brightness with which the feet of the 78 The Messages to the Seven Churches Saviour shone, and which St. John compares to %aXKoAtySai/o?. The Vulgate renders the word auricJtalcum, or orichalcum, an alloy of gold and brass. Some think that the last half of the word {Xi/3av6(;) should be detached from the first, and con strued as a proper name, to mean " Lebanon," and that the whole word would then mean, " brass of Lebanon," or moun tain brass. Wordsworth conjectures that the word \t/8avo? may be taken to mean frankincense, and that the reference is to copper in a state of ignition, like frankincense when it is red hot. Trench makes the word a hybrid, the first half Greek, and the second Hebrew, the word XtySavo? being taken from the Hebrew p7 (laban) white ; the entire word would then mean, brass in a state of white heat. There is great objection to this, as it is a very unusual thing to have such a combina tion, except perhaps in proper names. If then a Greek word could be found from which Xij3avo'; could be derived, it would be preferable, and Wordsworth has suggested that it might come from Xei^m (liquo), and that the word would then mean, liquid or molten brass. This finds acceptance from the words which follow, " as if they burned in a furnace " ; and, considering the variety of views which have been advanced, we may regard this derivation as conveying the meaning of the passage as fully as any other, besides being in closer analogy with the requirements of the language. The description here given seems to indicate judgment, just as the preceding clause was expressive of indignation against the Lord's adversaries. In Isaiah Ixiii. i, the question is put, " Who is this that cometh from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah ? " and in the answer it is said, " I have trodden the winepress alone, and of the people there was none with Me : for I will tread them in Mine anger, and trample them in My fury." In Malachi iv. 2, 3, reference is also made to this mode of executing judgment : " Ye shall go forth, and grow up as calves of the stall. And ye shall of Asia Minor. 70 tread down the wicked, for they shall be ashes under the soles of your feet." We may, therefore, consider the imagery here introduced as denoting the power with which Christ should subdue His enemies, and bring deliverance to His oppressed and down-trodden servants. Kai rj (f>wvrj avTov fa? (jtmvrj vBdrav •jroXXwv, and His voice as the voice of many waters. This is descriptive of majesty and authority. Next to the power and majesty of the voice of the Lord in the loud thunder-peal we may regard the deep sound of the waters of the sea. In Daniel x. 6, the imagery used is less in grandeur than that here introduced. " And the voice of His words, Hke the voice of a multitude," does not give the same idea of overwhelming majesty and might as the voice of the far-sounding sea. Ezekiel has adopted the latter symbol (xliii. 2) when, speaking of the glory of the God of Israel, he says : " His voice was like the sound of many waters, and the earth shined with His glory." When, at the cave of Horeb, the Lord appeared to Elijah, there was the wind that rent the mountains, then the earth quake, and the fire, — but the Lord was not in these, — and, after the' fire, a still small voice. He came to give strength and a fresh commission to His servant, to confirm the hands that were hanging down and the feeble knees ; therefore that voice was the voice of love and mercy. And when the Lord Jesus Christ went forth on His mission of love to the souls of men, the spirit of Prophecy had declared respecting Him : " He shall not strive nor cry, neither shall any man hear His voice in the streets." UnHke the ostentatious Pharisees, His demeanour was calm, yet dignified ; His preaching earnest, yet unobtrusive. But now, when He comes to the Apostle in Patmos, His voice is as the voice of many waters — solemn and deep, loud and penetrating. It is not the gentle voice which was lifted up in pity, pleading for the Jews, His countrymen : " Ye will not come unto Me that ye might have 8o The Messages to the Seven Churches life " ; not the voice which spoke in accents of sorrow as He saw Jerusalem for the last time, " How often would I have gathered thee, but ye would not"; nor was it the voice that woke the dead at the gates of Nain, or brought back Lazarus from his tomb. It is the voice of judgment addressing im penitent sinners, carrying in its deep tones alarm to the con science, and conveying a sense of remorse to those who have set themselves against Christ, alike to false friends and open foes, to whom nothing remains but a fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation which shall devour the ad versaries. However much His rebellious subjects may rise against Him, and however loud their hard sayings, the voice of Christ is irresistible, for He shall " smite the earth with the rod of His mouth, and with the breath of His lips shall He slay the wicked " (Isa. xi. 4). Ver. 16. KoiX 'e'j(wv iv ry Be^ia avrov %ei/3t daTepa<; eirTa, Kal iK TOV aTOfiaro^ avrov pop, Owing to that consubstantiality between the Father and the Son, Christ could proclaim Himself as the Resurrection and the Life, and declare that he that had seen Him had seen the Father ; not that Christ was the Father, as the Patropassians alleged, but because of Christ's co- equality with the Father. On this passage St. Chrysostom says : " He who sees My Divine substance sees the substance of the Father. Whence it is clear that Christ is not a creature, for they who see the creature see not God. Christ is there fore consubstantial with the Father." All life is the gift of Christ, and Christ is therefore called the Word of Life (i John i. i), the Logos whose essence is Life. It was Christ's object to manifest this life as well as to communicate it. Life, and love, and light constituted the irXijpwp.a, or fulness which dwelt in Christ, of which His disciples have received. Of Christ it may be said as in Psalm xxxvi. 9, " For with Thee is the Fountain of Life : in Thy Hght shall we see light." As God, He is the Fountain of Life, for all created life has pro ceeded from Him. This St Paul, in his speech before the Athenians, took occasion to inform the benighted Agnostics, when he quoted one of their poets (Aratus) : " For in Him we live, and move, and have our being ; as certain also of your oJ Asia Minor. 91 own poets have said. For we are also His offspring." All derived life proceeds from Christ, and depends for its main tenance upon Him, whether we view it physically or spiritu ally. Life in Christ is personal life. All life is not represented here as proceeding from a great boundless expanse, and each individual unit of existence as coming from this great ocean and returning to it again. Pantheistic ideas of God are quite inconsistent with what oUr blessed Lord here describes Him self, and the Living One. Pantheism makes God and the uni verse one, and regards all manifestations of outward activity and life as expressions of the working of this speculative deity, if we can apply this term to an impersonality. The Pantheist's notion is that the aggregate of life is God, life in the plant, life in the animal, or the higher Hfe in man. We can find no place for personality in the Pantheist's God, no consciousness, no memory, no will. And it is singular that, while we recognise personal existence here, and beings endowed with personal faculties, yet, on the Pantheist's hypothesis, the source of life must have communicated to others what it did not itself possess I In this view of God we see no room for morality — no distinction between good and evil. We hear not the voice of the Lord by the prophet saying : " Say ye to the righteous, that it shall be well with him, for they shall eat the fruit of their doings. Woe unto the wicked ! it shall be ill with him, for the reward of his hands shall be given him" (Isa. iii. 10, 11). Yet the Pan theistic theory is plausible. It tells us that what once exists can never cease to exist, and therefore holds out the hope of immortality ; but it is an immortality which, to all intents and purposes, is no better than non-existence ; for if the soul loses all its powers — if the Ego, that which distinguishes one from another — if personal identity be lost, what good can there be in the prolongation of existence.' what greater benefit to continue in endless Hfe than to become finally and for 92 The Messages to the Seven Churches ever annihilated? To all who know the power of Christ's resurrection, how different the prospect, how infinitely brighter the hope ! " Because I live," says Christ, " ye shall live also " — not in some impersonal unconscious condition, but as par takers of the Divine nature, and as sharers with Him in the happiness of a personal immortality ; that which the patriarch of Uz, with the eye of faith, looked forward to, when he said, " I know that my Redeemer liveth, and that He shall stand at the latter day upon the earth, and though after my skin worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh shall I see God, whom I shall see for myself, and mine eyes shall behold and not another" (Job xix. 25-27). And what was the hope of the Apostle of the Gentiles when he was about to lay down his life in exchange for the martyr's crown } — " Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, shall give me at that day, and not to me only, but unto all them also that love His appearing " (2 Tim. iv. 8). Kai iyev6p,rjv veKp6<;, Kal iBoii ^wv eip,i et? Toii<; at'cSva?, k.t.X. This applies strictly to Christ's death and resurrection. St. John had been an eyewitness of the Crucifixion, and was one of the two disciples who went, at the dawn of the first day of the week, and who had seen the empty grave. He had seen Christ after His resurrection, and had heard his Lord's answer to St. Peter, when he asked respecting the beloved disciple, " Lord and what shall this man do ? " — " If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee ? Follow thou Me " (John xxi. 21, 22). The Resurrection of Christ was the grand central fact of Christianity. Upon it the whole weight of Christianity depends. It is like the keystone to the arch, like the central sun to the solar system. If it was essential for Christ to die to save the world, it was equally necessary that He should rise again from the dead to prove Himself a Saviour. If He died to purchase redemption — to give His life a Xiirpov of Asia Minor. ni (ransom) for many — He rose again in order that He might live to apply the benefits of that purchase to the souls of His people. To this great fact our Lord frequently pointed His disciples during the period of His personal Ministry; and, after His resurrection, when one was chosen to fill up the gap left by Judas, the object of this election was, that "one must be ordained to be a witness with us of His resurrection" (Acts i. 22). What is the evidence upon which our Lord's resurrec tion rests ? In this age of myths and misbeliefs, it is needful that the Christian should thoroughly see that he is following no cunningly devised fable, but that the evidence upon which his faith stands is sufficient to support that faith amid all the chances and changes of time. In every Christian's own bosom there is an all powerful evidence. He may not be able to enter into and appreciate all the external evidences which may be appealed to in order to convince the gainsayer, but he can say with the blind man whose eyes the Lord opened — " Whether Christ be a sinner or no, I know not ; but one thing I know, whereas I was blind, now I see." Happy are they who thus have experimental evidence, who know in their hearts the joy and peace in believing ; who have not sought for the touch required by the incredulous disciple, but who enjoy the blessedness of those who, having not seen yet have believed. What have Christianity and its great Author done for me .¦• Do I know Him .¦" Am I found in Him not having mine own righteousness which is of the law, but the righteous ness which is of God by faith .' Am I living to magnify Him in life and in death, and have I the calm assured hope of living with Him hereafter .? But there are people who are differently constituted, who will not be satisfied unless they can have all their doubts and misgivings removed, and whose rule is, " Prove all things, and doubt all things until they be proved." Among men of this class was our Lord's disciple, St. Thomas, and the Lord graciously condescended to his 94 The Messages to the Seven Churches weakness " for the more confirmation of the faith," and gave him the proof of His resurrection which he required, after receiving which he exclaimed " My Lord and my God ! " There is one case of conversion to Christianity on record to which every doubting inquirer should refer, namely, that of St. Paul. We ask how it was that Saul of Tarsus, when going to Damascus to persecute the Christians, suddenly became converted ? He was a Pharisee, an able dialectician, a man of influence, of means, and education, and one not favourably disposed to the despised sect of the Nazarenes — he was one capable of weighing evidence, and not likely to be imposed upon ; and we should sooner expect the high priest to descend from his palace, and cast in his lot with the perse cuted followers of Jesus, than this cruel, blood-thirsty, blas pheming murderer, who was mad with passion against the Christians. Why did he suddenly lose that savage nature, that cruel taste for blood, and become a preacher of the Cross .-" He tells us in i Corinthians xv. 8, and ix. i — " Have not I seen Christ Jesus the Lord ? " He proclaims himself a witness of the resurrection. He was thoroughly convinced that Christ had actually spoken to him on his way to Damascus ; and in proof of that firm persuasion regarding the truth of our Lord's resurrection, he went and preached that gospel which he once endeavoured to destroy. When our Lord appeared to His scattered followers on the morning of the resurrection day, could it have been a dream, or a vision ? If there had been only an appearance to one, such might be possible ; but there were five disthict appear ances on the day of the resurrection. For forty days He manifested Himself; He was seen ofthe disciples in breaking of bread— by the way — in the city — by the side of the Lake — in Galilee, by 500 at once — they talked to Him, and He to them — they ate with Him, they saw His face, they knew the familiar voice, — they saw He was no spirit ; — in His resur- of Asia Minor. gc rection body He gave them tangible proofs when He said, " handle Me and see, for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see Me have," — and at the end of the forty days He ascended in their presence from " the Mount called Olivet " to heaven. What followed ? The Holy Ghost, according to His promise, was sent on the Day of Pentecost to bestow the miraculous gift of tongues. What caused the change of the Sabbath from the seventh to the first day of the week 1 Surely what had been observed from the creation of the world, and had become one of the most sacred of the Jewish ordinances, could not have undergone a change so suddenly without sufficient grounds. What was the cause of the establishment of a Christian Church upon earth .-' It could not have arisen without some all-powerful impulse. The two or three humble followers of the despised Nazarene could not have accom plished the " turning of the world upside down," unless there was power given them from on high. And then when we look at the lives of the Apostles — all, excepting the aged disciple of Patmos, after testifying to the fact of our Lord's resurrection, laying down their lives in defence of what they had believed and taught — surely we have such evidence as carries with it overwhelming conviction, and if we are not persuaded by it, neither would we be persuaded though one rose from the dead. Christ then appeared to St. John more than thirty years after the last of the witnesses of the resurrection in the person of St. Paul had passed away. He might feel, like Elijah, that he was left alone, unbefriended, and helpless ; that Jesus whom he had seen go away from Mount Olivet was still within the folds of that ascending cloud, and while a spectator of the trials and sufferings of His disciple, was too far removed to bring him relief ; but Christ once more reveals Himself to him, as he had proclaimed Himself at the grave of Lazarus, " The 96 The Messages to the Seven Churches Resurrection and the Life." " I was dead, and behold I am alive for evermore." " Christ being raised from the dead, dieth no more, death hath no more dominion over Him." He still lives, and because He lives, our prayers are presented before God ; because He lives, our daily infirmities and transgressions are forgiven ; because He lives, the door of heaven is kept open and the repentant sinner may find access, for over its archway is written, " By Me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out and find pasture." Because He lives, we can calmly await the issues of life, and meet the last enemy in the mortal struggle, not as an adversary, but a friend sent to unbar the prison gates which surround us, and set free the emancipated spirit, to find a shelter and home in His bosom, until the day shall dawn and the shadows flee away, when He shall have swallowed up death in victory. Koi e%ft) Ta? «X6t?, k.t.X., and T have the keys of death and of Hades. In the Revised Version the reading is properly changed into " of death and of Hades," which appears more in harmony with the nature of things. It is death which contributes to the filling up of the unseen world, and day by day multitudes are borne thither to swell the myriad throng. Of death and Hades, Christ holds the keys. By His victory over natural death. He proved His power and authority, of which the keys are the emblem ; and in every soul which is reclaimed from the thraldom of Satan, He asserts His power over spiritual death. During our Lord's ministry. He exercised lifegiving power over three individuals who had been claimed by Death as his trophies ; and by His own glorious resurrection, we are told, " He destroyed death and him that had the power of death, that is, the devil, and delivered them who, through fear of death, were all their lifetime subject to bondage" (Heb. ii. 14, 15). And now, by His word and Spirit, He is robbing of Asia Minor. 97 the prince of darkness of his spoils, and opening up the kingdom of heaven to all believers. When we think on the triumphs of the Cross, during the past, we may well exclaim : " What hath God wrought " ! Each land retrieved from barbarism — each soul quickened and converted, sancti fied and saved — is evidence that the keys are still in Christ's hands, that He openeth and no man shutteth, and shutteth and no man openeth. Multitudes now live to bear testimony to the moral conquests of Him who, in the words of Richter, " being the Holiest among the mighty, and Mightiest among the holy, has lifted with His pierced hand empires off" their hinges, has turned the stream of centuries out of its channel, and still governs the ages.'' Every effort made to check the spread of Christianity and to extinguish the name of its Founder has only recoiled disastrously upon the assailants, and given fresh strength to the cause they sought to destroy. Porphyry, and Celsus, and Julian, strove in past times, to overthrow the City of God, but the Stone of Stumbling fell upon them, and crushed them to powder. Nor will it be otherwise now in these last days. While the keys are in the hands of the Son of God, it needs no prophet to predict the perpetuity of spiritual life in the world. Christ has also the keys of Hades. This word corresponds to ^iJ^'i^ (Sheol) in the Old Testament, and never in any passage does it mean the final abode of the reprobate. In the New Testament it is used to denote the place of dis embodied spirits, or the unseen world. Now we profess in the Creed to believe in the descent of Christ into hell, and in Art III. " As Christ died for us, and was buried, so also is it to be believed, that He went down into Hell." In Ps. xvi. David says, "Thou wilt not leave my soul in hell, neither wilt Thou suffer Thine Holy One to see corruption ; " and in Acts ii. St. Peter tells us that this passage refers prophetically to Christ : so that when we declare our belief H 98 The Messages to the Seven Churches in the descent of Christ into hell, or Hades, it is important to understand what is meant by it By the word Hades, we are to understand the place of departed spirits, whether good or bad ; to the one class, a state of bliss and peace — a foretaste of heaven — th6 complete happiness of which will be realized at the Resurrection ; to the other, a place of restraint and anguish, and also a foretaste of that greater woe which awaits the ungodly. In the unseen world there are two states or conditions : Paradise, into which the soul of Christ entered after its separation from the body, and Gehenna, where the souls of the ungodly remain until the General Resurrection. These two states are separated from each other by an impass able gulf, as we read in the parable of the rich man and Lazarus. The place of eternal torment, which is spoken of as the second death, has never yet had, and will not receive any, occupants until after the Great Day. Disembodied spirits do not enter at death into that perfect glory to which after the Resurrection they shall attain. Hades is not in itself a place of happiness or misery ; yet those who enter it must be either happy or miserable according to what their lives have been here. Lazarus was comforted, while the rich man was tor mented. The dying malefactor was with Christ in Paradise that very day on which his body was left hanging on the cross, a deformed spectacle, showing to men and to angels that he was not fit to live. The felicity which will arise to the righteous between death and the resurrection, will proceed from a sense of God's favour, and the everlasting security of God's preservation against external foes ; and the misery of the wicked in Hades will proceed from remorse of conscience — from memory reminding them of what they might have been, had they been wise in time — and possibly from a sense of anticipation of their final doom ; and if they are not excluded from seeing beyond that gulf— as the rich man saw Lazarus in Abraham's bosom — the comfort and safety of the of Asia Minor. 99 blessed, from the enjoyment of which they are for ever shut out, — this will in itself be an aggravation of their sufferings. There is one passage bearing on this subject in i Peter iii. 18, where we read of Christ having gone and preached to the spirits in prison during the interval between His having been "put to death in the flesh," and His resurrec tion. This has received a variety of interpretations, as well in early as in modern times. The obvious reading of the passage would lead one to believe that Christ went in spirit, i.e. without any instrumentality of the body, and preached to the spirits of those who were shut in Hades, in safe keeping, but who had been disobedient in the days of Noah. Why did Christ preach to them, and for what purpose? Did He proclaim the gospel to them with the object of leading them to repentance "i A very able writer ^ has recently answered this question in the affirmative, and has adduced Matthew xii. 32, to prove that repentance, recon ciliation, and salvation are admissible in Hades, and that the special proclamation of peace to the souls of the ante diluvian sinners would in equity demand the communication of it to all who have not heard it here. But it might be askeid, how could this view be reconciled with what our Lord says in Luke xvi. 26, about a great gulf fixed, so as to prevent any communication between the two portions of Hades >. Read also John ix. 4 ; Heb. iii. 13; ix. 27. All the calls to repentance, which the Scriptures contain, are ad dressed only to those who are in the flesh — we find none speaking of repentance and salvation beyond the grave. cure ev toutw to3 aiwvi, ovre iv tw /ieXXoj/Tt has been sug gested as implying eternal hope; but this expression is a Hebraism for nunquam."^ In the parallel passage in St. 1 Dean Reichel, Serm,. Ch. of Eng. Pulpit, vol. xii. p. 145. 2 6 oiibv oStos corresponds to the Messianic age, just as ^i* ti? /iAXoi/n, refers to the time that follows the Second Advent, and the phrase combined may be regarded as a Hebraism equivalent to semper, as in Ephesians i. 21. IOO The Messages to the Seven Churches Mark, we read he hath never forgiveness (Mark iii. 29), St. Mark explains what St. Matthew has expressed enig matically. The view taken by the writer alluded to above is not unlike that of Origen, one of whose heresies was that, after many ages, all sinners should obtain pardon. How then is the preaching of our Lord to the spirits in prison to be explained ? We know neither the subject matter of Christ's preaching to the spirits in prison, nor do we know of any results which followed. We are not told of any of the people during the 120 years in which the ark was in building, having been saved, except Noah and his family. By Christ's going in Spirit, and preaching to the spirits in prison, may it not have been with the design of making known His power and triumph over death and Satan, to all disembodied spirits t Besides, the circumstances of the ante diluvians were unique. A similar condition can never occur again, for God has given us the assurance that He will never again destroy the earth by a flood of waters. Dean Alford has also entertained the notion that a second day of grace was granted in Hades to the antediluvians ; but, as has been already observed, " Now is the accepted time, now is the day of salvation." There would be less difficulty in ex pounding this passage if, instead of taking the Spirit of Christ to mean His disembodied spirit, separated from the body by death, it were to be taken as that quickening energy by which He raised Himself from the dead, and by which He went and preached — iropevOeli; iKrjpv^ev. The Syriac version has Et predicavit. Cases might be found in Greek writers where the phrase. He went and preached, may be con sidered a pleonasm for simply, " He preached." In Ephesians ii. IS, 17, we read, iXOwv evrjyyeXia-aro, and came and preached peace, etc. Now Christ did not go personally to the Gentiles to preach peace to them — He did so by His apostles ; so by His Spirit in Noah He preached for 120 years to the antedi- of Asia Minor. loi luvians, who were disobedient and perished for their unbelief. When Noah preached to them, they were men in the flesh ; they were now spirits in prison when St. Peter wrote, kept unto the judgment of the Great Day. Or the prison may be construed as indicating the condition in which the souls of the antediluvians were bound upon the earth, during the time that God's long-suffering waited, just as the fallen angels are said by St. Jude to be in chains, under darkness, unto the judgment of the Great Day, although now permitted to exercise their malignity upon the earth. There is a parallel passage in Isaiah xxiv. 21, 22, where the Jews are represented as being shut up as in a prison, and which may have had its fulfilment when Nebuchadnezzar besieged Jerusalem, and afterwards when Titus Vespasian surrounded it, and shut in the inhabitants, previous to their final overthrow. What then will the passage in i Peter iii. 19, teach ? It will show us that Christ, by His Spirit in Noah, preached for 120 years to the antediluvians, who were then as in prison, being bound by the chain of their sins. A proclamation of mercy was given them, but they took no heed to it. That Spirit in Noah enabled him to bear the reproaches and blasphemies of that wicked race, and steadfastly to stretch out his hands- to a disobedient and gainsaying people. This same Spirit of Christ can enable you, the Christians of the dispersion, to suffer patiently the fiery trial through which you are now passing, " not accepting deliverance, that you may obtain a better resurrection." But why is reference made to the days of Noah at all, as the Apostle is speaking of patient en durance and suffering for righteousness' sake .-• Because not only was Noah a perfect example in this respect, but the ark in which he was safely kept was a symbol of the bless ings which Christians derive from being admitted into the ark of Christ's Church, and sealed with the baptismal seal of the New Covenant And as the ark was a type of 102 The Messages to the Seven Churches Christ's Church, the admission to which is by baptism, so the flood, which destroyed the ungodly, was a like type of that everlasting destruction with which the wicked in this dispen sation shall be punished, " from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power " (2 Thess. i. 9). Eight persons were saved by water ; for that which brought safety to them, brought destruction to the world of the ungodly. This water, which was thus the medium of safety to Noah :and his family, was a figure of the waters of baptism, which is now putting us into a state of salvation. It was not the fiood that preserved Noah, but it was the means of sustaining the ark ; it transferred him from the old world to the new, and was therefore to Noah a kind of baptism, just as the Red Sea was to the children of Israel. "The Hke figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us " — not of itself, but the spiritual thing conjoined with it, repentance and faith, of which it is the sign and the seal. Christ has therefore descended into the region of the dead, and has come forth the conqueror of its tyrant king ; and He holds in His hands alike the keys of the grave and the unseen world, admitting and excluding as He pleases, until He shall return to unlock their prison doors for ever, and swallow up death in victory. Ver. 19. Tpd-^ov ovv a etSe?, Kal d eiai, Kal d p,iXXei yiveadai p^erd ravra, write therefore the things which thou sawest, and tJte things which are, and the things which shall come to pass hereafter. The a et'o-i is interpreted by some as the same as d eiBe'i, and the former is taken as an explana tion of the things St. John had seen — or " what they are " ; and this view is supported by the fact that an explanation is at once given of the mystery of the seven stars and the seven golden candlesticks. In this respect St. John was specially privileged, as the of Asia Minor. 103 Apostles were not instructed, as a rule, to throw Hght upon what had been communicated to them, by ofifering an ex planation. But the things St. John saw included more than the a eiai, for the vision we have just now described, and en deavoured to elucidate, and the whole indeed of chapter i., are quite distinct from the d eiai, which occupies the ad dresses to the Seven Churches in chapters ii. iii. " Write : for what thou sawest is proof that I, the first and the last, and the Living One, am able to fulfil what I promise, and that My words shall stand to a thousand generations — that heaven and earth may pass away but My words shall not pass away. Write, therefore, because I have the keys of death and Hades, and I know the Church's trials, and will bring her safely through them all. Write, for her encouragement, for her comfort, for her support" " The things that are," relate to the condition of the Churches of Asia Minor, to which he was instructed to give both warning and consolation. " The things that shall be hereafter," refer to the things recorded from Revelation iv. to the end, and which are a symbolical representation of the Church's future history. The words, p,erd Tavra, after these things, are indefinite. They do not fix the period embraced by the Apocalypse ; but we know, from the concluding portions of the book, that, as the Bible begins with Paradise lost, it ends with Paradise regained ; and the grand terminus of prophecy is, therefore, reached, when, after all the events connected with the Second Advent, the first resurrection, the binding of Satan, the millennial reign of Christ with His risen saints, the General Judgment follows, and the new heaven and new earth, fitted for the reception of the redeemed, are occupied by their pure and spotless inhabitants, whose unending and unabated enjoyment and happiness shall be the service of their God. Heaven shall be the Great Temple of the Universe, lighted up by the presence of God Himself. His servants shall serve Him; they shall see I04 The Messages to the Seven Churches His face ; enjoy, what they ardently longed for here, the rapture of the Beatific Vision ; and His name shall be in their foreheads ; and they shall reign for ever and ever. Thus the perd ravra reaches to the final consummation of all things ; and the outlines of the Church's history were intended to be defined with accuracy and precision, from the period in which the Apocalyptic vision was revealed until the end, when the Church militant here on earth would be exchanged for the Church triumphant in heaven. Ver. 20. TO pivaTrjpiov toii/ emd darepwv, wv eiBe<; irrl t-^? Sefta? p.ov, Kal Td