I m m i«i <&mmdedsv%- c£i. 'CcU&Zd' # Booty bj the {Same Author. # FROM BOSTON TO BAREILLY AND BACK. Portrait and Index. 517 pages. 121110. Cloth, $1.35. THE LAND OF THE VEDA: Personal Reminiscences of India — its People, Castes, Thugs, and Fakirs ; its Religions, Mythology, Princi pal Monuments, Palaces, and Mausoleums ; Incidents of the Great Sepoy Rebellion, etc. Map and Forty- two Illustrations. 8vo. Index. 557 pages. Cloth, $3.00; Morocco antique, $7.00. BENITO JUAREZ, The " "Washington " of Mexico. © Mexico in Transition The Power of Political I^omani^m Civil and ^eliqiou^ Liberty By WILLIAM BUTLER, D.D. SEAL OF MEXICO 'THERE IS A WAKING ON THE MIGHTY HILLS, A KINDLING WITH THE SPIRIT OF THE MORN.' ILLUSTRATED. NEW YORK : HUNT & EATON CINCINNATI : CRANSTON & CURTS Copyright, 1892, by lEllTTINrT cfc EATOM, New York. PREFACE. In view of the false representations which were so indus triously disseminated during the struggle described in this work by those who had an interest in the wrongs which Mexico so long endured, it is hoped that our readers may kindly excuse the constant quotations and documentary as pect of much of the text. Only by going back to original evidence and furnishing the authority for our statements could these falsehoods be exposed and the whole truth be placed before our readers. This for the author was a long, slow, and laborious process. But we believe it has been amply jus tified, and that the reading public has now at last Mexico's side of the question placed before it, with its evidences, so that it can form a more intelligent opinion upon the merits of the mighty struggle which was so providentially guided to an issue that, while it overwhelmed the enemies of the rights of the Mexican people, at the same time and in due order vindicated and established those rights upon foundations which it is ex pected will stand while sun and moon endure. The errors corrected the reader will find to have been very many ; some of them as willful and baseless as that which so daringly asserted that " Colonel Lopez was a traitor, who sold his sovereign and the password to the Republicans for thirty thousand dollars," and thus loaded down that officer for twenty years with an opprobrium that was heavy enough to have sunk him into a dishonored grave, while at the time his lips were closed in his own defense until the hour came, three years ago, when the commanding general broke the seal of silence and released the colonel from the peculiar and undeserved misery which he had so long endured under a sense of loyalty to the PREFACE. express wishes of Maximilian, adding another illustration to the maxim that " Truth is often stranger than fiction." While these pages were being prepared for the press, to illustrate the merciful intervention of Almighty God on behalf of those who are wronged and denied the rights of popular government, a remarkable utterance, and from a high quarter, for a contrary doctrine made its appearance. The United States senator from Kansas — regarded by his admirers as being " brainy, brilliant, and audacious " — saw fit to choose his oppor tunity lightly to pour his contempt upon convictions to which multitudes of thoughtful people give their earnest sympathy. Standing upon the battle-field of Gettysburg — upon ground hallowed by the blood of thousands of American heroes — this man is reported as having given utterance to the following pe culiar and amazing language : The purification of politics is an iridescent dream. Government is force. Politics is a battle for supremacy. Parties are the armies. The decalogue and the golden rule have no place in a political campaign. The object is success. To defeat the antagonist and expel the party in power is the purpose. In war it is lawful to deceive the adversary, to hire Hessians, to purchase mercenaries, to mutilate, to kill, to destroy. The commander who lost a battle through the activity of his moral nature would be the derision and jest of history. This modern cant about the corruption of politics is fatiguing in the extreme. It proceeds from the tea-cnstard and syllabub dilletanteism, the frivolous and desultory senti- mentalism of epicenes. No doubt but this would be welcome news to the enemies of the reign of law and personal and social purity everywhere, people who hate to be rebuked or controlled by either God or man, by law or by conscience. The decalogue and the ser mon on the mount stand very much in the way of such persons and it would have been greatly to their comfort and liberty of action had the senator been able to add the proof that they were really abrogated, as he said, and that such persons had nothing to fear from them either now or hereafter. ( But this book will show that it was not with such a creed as PREFACE. this that the wronged and suffering Liberals of Mexico struggled A up through their forty years of agony and effort to the joy of a purified political system which at last gave their country rest and peace. And surely the Christian and patriotic dead be neath that senator's feet in that cemetery, who gave up home, family, and life itself to rectify that " corruption of politics " which flung over out fair land treason, rebellion, and death, could they have risen from their graves, would have indignantly confronted him as he thus characterized convictions like theirs as " modern cant," etc. The conscience of the nation was shocked by this ill-omened utterance, and Kansas herself resented it as every way unwor thy of her own convictions. For a few weeks after, when the time for the re-election of her senator came round, she retired this man to private life and elected another in his place. Nor will the lesson be lost. It does not pay public men, and especially those in prominent positions, in the long run, to get into con flict with the Author of the ten commandments or the golden rule, or to turn an indifferent ear to the earnest appeals of the men or the women who look to them for sympathy and help in their struggles against sin and wrong. It seems singular that the refuge of divine law should be un welcome to any human being, or that men can be found who would object to have religion operate in this sphere of ours as though it were an intrusion to be tolerated only in the clouds above and the world beyond, but not to dictate here to the hearts and lives of men nor aim to control their private ways, much less their public acts and policies. Sooner or later an awakening comes to such dreamers, and they have to learn — often too late — that the ten commandments and the sermon on the mount were not given as laws of life to saints and angels in heaven, but to men and sinners down here in this wicked world, and that their mothers were right when they taught their infant lips to pray, " Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is done in heaven." Any attempt to exclude public life and its responsibilities from the sphere of conscience and the PREFACE. divine control, and then " to teach men so," is a high crime and misdemeanor, not only against the souls of men, but also against patriotism as well as religion, against love of country and love of God, all of which go hand in hand and constitute the " right eousness which exalteth a nation," and is equally exalting to its leading men. Rectification of wrong is the only true foundation of tranquil lity ; " first pure, then peaceable." " There is no peace, saith God, to the wicked," and never can be. The most perfect and permanent of all governments is that of the reigning Redeemer, of whose blessed administration the eternal Father testifies: " Unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever : a scepter of righteousness is the scepter of thy kingdom. Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity ; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows." He is the very model for legislators and governors. The anthem that inaugurated his administration has gone on sounding round the world ever since, " Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good-will toward men." He evidently maintains that purified politics and Christian prayer-meetings can go well together, that caucuses and class meetings stand related to each other, and that a man can he president of one of earth's mightiest empires and yet be a saint like Daniel, who bends his knees to the God whose help he implores. Thank Heaven, the men who recognize God in political life bear the names that humanity now loves to re member and honor — Protestant, Catholic, and heathen alike; and the number of such pure patriots is on the increase. It is not necessary that we quote illustrative instances. One alone shall speak a brief word for the whole class in decided contra diction of the unworthy utterance against which we here protest. The Marquis of Dalhousie was regarded by his contempora ries as the most distinguished governor-general that England ever sent to rule her Oriental empire. This honored man, dur ing the eight years that he held this great responsibility, ruled and guided nearly one sixth of the human family. His PREFACE. feeble frame bent down at last beneath the mighty load, but God, whom he had so long honored, enabled him to finish his duty. The day on* which his successor, Lord Canning, arrived, in 1856, he was ready to leave. They tenderly bore him from the viceregal palace in Calcutta down to the ship that awaited him, and laid him in the berth from which he was unable to rise till the voyage ended. As he lay there he wrote, with feeble hand, using pencil and tablets by his side, his last report to the Court of Directors. In that report he found room for God, and here is the finishing sentiment of his public life, so ger mane to our subject here : These papers are an instance of the principle that we should do right without fear of consequences. To fear God and to have no other fear is a maxim of religion, but the truth of it and the wisdom of it are proved every day in politics. The golden rule abrogated! Nay, verily. "Heaven and earth shall pass away, but His word shall not pass away ! " That word is pledged to help the oppressed of every land. " The meek shall inherit the earth and delight themselves in the abundance of peace." For nineteen hundred years since the Lord Jesus Christ announced his mission in Capernaum (Luke iv, 18) his has been the " power working for righteous ness " in all lands ; for this he lives and reigns. As immortal, while he may make haste, he does not need to hurry. He can take his time, for the future is all his own, and is sure to come to him for the completion of his great task. "Wisely and ef fectively is he now mightily working in " subduing all things unto himself" and guiding the elements in motion to the grand conclusions which will surely bring, by the attractions of his cross, the wide world to his feet in loving and adoring homage. Already there are millions of men and women who would will ingly lay down their lives for him to evidence that love ; and the number of such is daily increasing. Long after the men who have slighted his authority have passed away and been forgotten better men will be filling the positions which they PREFACE. were unworthy to occupy, and this glorious Deliverer will be closing up to completion the high mission of his manifesta tion. "In his name shall the Gentiles trust," not merely for the salvation of the soul, but also for the rectification of every wrong and the vindication of- every right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," for all the good available in " the life that now is, as well as for that which is to come." This " King of kings and Lord of lords," whose cross redeemed the world, is yet to sway its happy populations by his golden rule until even " the isles shall wait for his law." For ages this has been the expectation and prayer of Christians and lovers of the Bible, who have been looking forward to that ' ' One far-off divine event To which the whole creation moves." CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. Mexico's long and deep degradation — Unheeded — Daniel Webster — Warrant for the Conquest — Resources of Mexico — Population — The Armada — Mode of Christianizing Aztecs — Credibility of Cortez — Cuatemoctzin — Haciendas — Wealth of the Church — Lerdo's report — Fueros — Calderon and Domenech's testimony to desagravios and idolatrous worship — Character of clergy and people — Humboldt — Indulgences Page 1 CHAPTER II. " Gross darkness " — Mariolatry of Mexico unique — Hostility of the two Virgins — Their respective legends — Their fabulous wealth — General Thompson and Mrs. Gooch's testimony to this wild idolatry — The "cursed fools" of Guada lupe — Opposite parts taken by these Virgins in the conflict for popular rights — Impossible titles and relations — The terrible climax at Puebla — Mexico's degradation fully accounted for here — Dates of dogmas 42 CHAPTER III. From darkness to dawn through conflict and suffering — Spanish rule — Ticeroys — "Patriarch of Mexican Independence " — His "Grito" and helpers — The Bravos — Odds against freedom — Iturbide and coronation — Unfortunate return — Mon roe doctrine — Texan war and its object — McNamara and " Methodist wolves" — General Fremont — War with United States — Treachery at Cherubusco — The hand of God — Hidden refuge for Bible study in the Cafladas 64 CHAPTER IV. Extending freedom in South America. — Resisted by the pope — Liberalism dis tasteful to privilege — Duke of Richmond — Testimony of Curtis — Ecuador the papal model for Mexico — President Barrundia and the papal bull — Policy of Pius IX. — Constitutional freedom promised — Withdrawn — Flight of the pope to Gaeta — Roman republic — Papal appeal to Catholic powers to crush the Romans — Responded to by Louis Napoleon — Protest — Reaction and vengeance — "The Butcher of Bologna" — Gladstone — Sardinian-God within the shadow 96 CONTENTS. CHAPTER V. Desperate efforts of the Mexican clericals — Merits of the conflict — Coup dletatol the church party — Terrorizing policy of Miramon — Violation of British em bassy — Republican victories — Benito Juarez, Mexico's "Washington," and his aids — Perfidy of Louis Napoleon — Intervention — Co-operation of the pope — " Laws of reform " — Tripartite treaty — Jecker bonds — De Morny — Collapse of Jecker — " Cinco de Mayo " — Maximilian's call and warning. . . Page 118 CHAPTER VI. Why Maximilian failed — Warnings in Austrian history — Francis Joseph — Papal denunciation — Denying a grave — Jaurez and Congress — Jaurez and Lincoln — South American interest — Netherland League — Position of the United States — Marshal's disagreement with the archbishop — Impossible task — Em pire without foundation — Abbe" Domenech — Career for the Latin race — Grant — Failure of efforts — Nuncio — Pope's expostulation — Clericals in politics — Confidential letter of Carlota — Denial of papal authority 157 CHAPTER VII. England and recognition — Beecher's effort — Cotton-spinners of Lancashire — "Kicked out of Rome" — Papal. missive to "Lincoln & Co." — Recognition of Jeff Davis by the pontiff — Outline of policy — Interview with Juarez sought by Maximilian — Confidential letter of the emperor — False proclamation con cerning Juarez-^" The Black Decree " — Execution of Arteaga and Salazar — Letters — Libro Rojo — Santa Anna — Sudden departure of the empress — Inter view with the pope — Incurable insanity — French troops withdrawn — The emperor's attempted departure — Interference of French and clericals — Sheri dan at Rio Grande 181 CHAPTER VIII. Collapse of the empire — Siege of Queretaro — Efforts to escape — Capture of Maxi milian — Court-martial — Charges — Defense — Sentence — Appeals for pardon Why declined — Princess Salm-Salm — Plan of escape — Falsehood and bribery — Interview with Juarez — The execution — Unjust charges against Colonel Lopez — "Selling Maximilian for $30,000" — Escobedo's letter — Taking of Mexico city — Merciful treatment of prisoners — Santa Anna's last game — Disposal of the body of the archduke — Admission of Maximilian's lawyers 221 CHAPTER IX. "Vengeance is mine, I will repay, saith the Lord" — "So that men shall say, Verily there is a God that judgeth in the earth " — The conspirators against freedom — Could only be reached by the retributions of Almighty God The CONTENTS. pontiff — Temporal power for one thousand years — Decree of infallibility — Declaration of war — Downfall of Napoleon — The pope's temporal power ex tinguished — Italy unified — Papal coin — Scene in San Angelo — Emperor Will iam denies the pope's claim — Napoleon rushes to ruin at Sedan — End of his glory — Death of the Prince Imperial — Eugenie in exile — France republican — Religious liberty — Expulsion of the Jesuits Page 256 CHAPTER X. The star on Orizava — Summary of what Mexico has gained — Her resources — Im proved financial condition — Porfirio Diaz; — Evangelical missions — Miss Ran kin — Circus of Chiarini — Providential help — Purchase of Inquisition — Popular vengeance — Buried martyrs — General Assembly — Statistics of Protestantism — Persecution — Interview with President Diaz — Santa Anna — Epitaph — Tomb of Jaurez — Memorial services of the Emperor William — Madame Cal- deron's prophecy .\ . . 281 table of illustrations. Benito Juabez, The " Washington " of Mexico frontispiece Significant Seal of Mexico, Her Eagle, on the Nopal, killing the Serpent of Despotism ... on title pase Mexican System of Railways, pacing page Showing the eleven lines in use or under construction 1 Hernando Cortez, Marquis of the Valley of Oaxaca, Conqueror of this New World, and its first Captain-General, 1521 9 The Plaza, or Great Square of the Capital, The most historic spot in Mexico, and scene of its leading " Pronun- ciamentos." 25 The Disctplinas (two plates), Used on the hody for self-torture 32 The Virgin of Remedios, The Patroness of the Spaniards in Mexico 44 The Virgin of Guadalupe, The Patroness of the native Mexicans 48 Miguel Hidalgo, The " Patriarch of Mexican Independence." 67 General Santa Anna, The turbulent Dictator of Mexico 82 Pope Pius IX, Who sanctioned and sustained the usurpation of Maximilian 108 Louis Napoleon, Who originated the " Intervention " in Mexico 130 Maximilian, Archduke of Austria, For three years, by usurpation, " Emperor " of Mexico 169 Carlota, Archduchess of Austria, And " Empress" of Mexico 170 xvi TABLE OF ILLUSTRATIONS. The Monogram of Maximilian, facing pagb With Medallions of his favorite Generals 211 Cerro de las Campanas, Scene of the execution of Maximilian, June 19, 1867 240 General Porfirio Diaz, Mexico's brave soldier and honored president 286 Head-quarters of the Mission of the Methodist Episcopal Church, ' Calle de Gante, City of Mexico 292 The Inquisition, City of Puebla, Purchased by the Methodist Episcopal Church in 1873 293 Covered Way of the Inquisition, Connecting with the Examining Chapel 293 Martyrs of the Inquisition, Taken out of the cells in the walls, where they were built in to die 294 Personnel of the Mexican Annual Conference, in January, 1888, Seventeen of the number being natives of the country 297 Rev. J. L. Stephens, Congregational Missionary, Martyred at Ahualuloo, March, 1874 302 Rev. Epigmenio Monroy, Native Methodist Minister, Martyred near Apizaco, April 8, 1881 303 Interior of the Methodist Episcopal Church, City of Mexico, Formerly a part of the great San Franciscan monastery 313 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. CHAPTEE I. Mexico's long and deep degradation — Unheeded — Daniel Webster — Warrant for the Conquest — Resources of Mexico — Population — The Armada — Mode of Christianizing Aztecs — Credibility of Cortez — Cuatemoctzin — Haciendas — Wealth of the Church — Lerdo's report — Fueros — Calderon and Domenech's testimony to desagravios and idolatrous worship — Character of clergy and people — Humboldt — Indulgences. My interest in the events which this work is to describe originated in a Sabbath service toward the close of 1851. The congregation were singing Bishop Heber's missionary hymn, and as they reached the couplet " Till, like a sea of glory, It spreads from pole to pole," the glowing words seemed illuminated with a significance be yond any former apprehension. My attention was fixed, all else forgotten for the time, and questionings, new and strange, were speaking to my heart and insisting on being heard. Some of these questions ran on in this line : Does this congrega tion comprehend properly the meaning of the sublime thought to which they are giving utterance? Are they realizing the exalted hope which those lines express? Of what "poles" are they thinking — those of the eastern hemisphere, or those of our own continent, where the best connection of those poles exists by the formation which God has conferred upon them ? Here, then, where Heber's lines, in this sense, find their most literal interpretation, is the audience really anticipating the 2 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. hour when from the most northern of human homes the " sea of glory " is to illumine and bless the dwellers of the three Americas till it reaches the southern cape and crowns it with the cross of the world's Kedeemer ? Or, was the glowing song a mere poetic sentiment to fan for a moment the affections of these worshipers and, without further significance, sacrifice, or personal duty, to pass from their minds and be forgotten ? There was at least one heart in that assembly which was not to forget them while life shall last. The halo that invested those two lines was to draw its attention and stimulate its faith and hope, until now, after more than forty years, the great public events that have meanwhile transpired upon these conti nents have been seen and understood with increasing clearness in the illumination of that hour, and it has apprehended how wondrously God is moving in those lands to turn the hope of Heber's hymn into the bright reality of the perfect evangelical day, when the whole American hemisphere shall be radiant with the glory of the Lord. This book is the result of these increas ing and glad convictions, and the author's hope is that, when his readers have examined the facts traced and united here, they too will share his confidence and be ready to address them selves, " as workers together with God," to the sacrifices and duties which the hour and the divine call demand for their realization from the Church of Christ. The interest thus aroused developed into an anxiety to ascer tain what was the actual political, social, and religious condition of the nations existing between our own border and the south ern pole. Those seventeen States had then an aggregate popu lation exceeding that of the United States and Canada com bined. The results of this inquiry, faithfully prosecuted for a considerable length of time, through an extensive examination and correspondence, were sad indeed. In this advanced day people can hardly appreciate the fearful darkness and destitution which then prevailed over Central and South America, or realize that there was not then among the nearly forty-eight millions of human beings between our Texan border and Cape Horn one MEXICO IN TRANSITION. missionary of evangelical Christianity addressing those millions in their own tongue ! All was darkness and spiritual death ! Nearly every one of those States were bound hand and foot in concordat relations with the papal power, these concordats requiring the executive of each nation to make ecclesiastical matters paramount in his administration; to repress all dissent, even to the extent of the forfeiture of freedom or property — sometimes even of life itself; to maintain, unquestioned and un challenged, the stern rule of the papacy over these benighted millions. This had been going on for centuries past, and it was fully purposed to perpetuate the same dark dominion for ages yet to come ! No Bible, no missionary, no light from any source was to be permitted to enter or disturb this reign of igno rance and sin. It seemed in some respects a worse condition than that of any heathenism on earth, because more cruel, re pressive, and unreformable. Sufficient evidence of this will be forthcoming, most of it furnished by the very people whom Rome had overburdened for centuries, till at last, uhable to en dure longer, they have risen in their wrath, one State after another, and taken vengeance upon their clerical oppressors. They have snatched from their hands the civil and religious freedom which had been so long withheld, and secularized the vast church property which their clergy had unlawfully ac quired and so long employed for their own selfish purposes. This hour of divine relief had not dawned in 1851. Years of agony had yet to be endured ere it appeared, and the suf fering friends and martyrs of freedom and a purer faith had to wait and still cry to the Almighty, under their bitter pressure, " How long, O Lord, how long ? " Santa Anna was then in power, in the third term of his dic tatorship, and this record will evidence that a more unscrupu lous tool of the papacy never held a scepter. . Since the first blow was struck for freedom in Mexico, and the life of its noblest martyr was sacrificed, in 1811, occasional rumors reached the outside world revealing something of the struggles which the lovers of liberty were maintaining against fearful MEXICO IN TRANSITION. odds, and how the strong hand of the Church and the Spanish party were cruelly repressing their aspirations, endeavoring to extinguish them. It seems strange now, as we look back, how unconscious our people generally were of the condition of things in Mexico, • how little they realized the depth of the degradation in which her millions were perishing, or how long she had agonized to be lifted up to the condition of our land. We dreamed not of the debt we owed to her, and the nations beyond, but left them to their fate. Meanwhile we were loud enough in our jubila tion over our own happy condition, unconscious that we were side by side with a race of people, then more numerous than ourselves, who were under the dread control of the darkest Romanism on earth ! Forty years ago, in a circle of friends, some of whom ex pressed fears of national difficulties to grow out of the unset tled north-eastern and north-western boundaries, Daniel "Webster said: No, gentlemen, our great national difficulty lies not in that direction. Our greatest danger is that we have a sister republic on our southern border, almost in mortal agony, and no one amongst us seems willing to lend it a helping hand. Truly to comprehend the Mexican question we need to re call the professed Warrant for the Conquest. The origin of the title by which Spain and the Church of Rome claimed Mexico, and indeed the entire western hemisphere, as their exclusive domain, was an audacious act of the Roman pontiff at the close of the fifteenth century. The craze of the Crusades led men to imagine that the kingdom of Christ could be extended by the sword, and the maritime nations of the age waxed jealous of each other's share in the work and the gain it involved. Add to this motive the love of adventure and military glory, and the passion of avarice, and you have the elements which moved men, and often the vilest of men, to volunteer for such enterprises. As a warrant for all they undertook they looked to the pope to bestow the sanction, of Heaven upon their vent- MEXICO IN TRANSITION. ures. The pope, nothing loath, readily authorized such expe ditions, and that on the most extensive scale. Alexander VI., in 1494, settled the conflicting claims of the kings of Spain and Portugal by dividing the world between them. The account runs thus : He divided' the undiscovered regions of the earth by an imaginary line of longitude", running through the Atlantic Ocean, from pole to pole, three hundred and seventy miles west of the Azores. He gave the Portuguese unlimited sway over all the countries that they might discover to the east of that line, and pledged himself to confirm to Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain the right to every isle, continent, and sea where they should plant their flag on the western hemisphere. Hence in every picture of the landing of Columbus the first act in the scene is the planting of the flag of the Spanish crown.* This authority was to be unlimited and to cover all things temporal and spiritual ; the bodies and souls, the property and services of the conquered nations were to be their peculiar in heritance, and that of their successors forever. Such was the title-deed of Ferdinand and Isabella to North, Central, and South America. This wonderful grant of Alexander YI. was confirmed by his successor, Pope Julius II., to the Spanish monarchy. Thus the whole continent, " from pole to pole," all the kingdoms of this New "World, were assumed to be handed over to a dynasty by a pontiff who did not own and had no right to a foot of the territory or a single human being upon it. But where are the two empires so pompously divided to Portugal and Spain ? "Where the " Conquest " made under the authority of Alexander VI., and consolidated with such crush ing force on poor humanity, especially in Mexico ? What of the proud claims which Spaniards made when they engraved across their maps of the western world the words " New Spain," which were made to stretch from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific coast, and from the St. Lawrence to the southern cape, terri torially the greatest empire that the world had ever seen ? The pontifical gift has been wrested out of their blood-stained hands * Mexico and the United States, by Gorham D. Abbot, p. 21. Putnam. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. by a mightier Power than their own ; her sons who did all this wrong have been shaken out of this New World ; the bound aries which she obliterated have been restored ; the races which she so cruelly oppressed have risen again in this wonderful day to power, and her proud title has been erased from the maps of this hemisphere. The assumptions of Alexander VI. would have had far less significance to the world had not the papacy supposed they had found in them a clew to universal dominion over mankind. This idea was followed out, and Pope Paul III. convoked a council in the city of Trent, in 1545, which was to legislate, under the professed authority of the Holy Spirit, a body of canons that were to subject all mankind for all ages to the will of one man in the papal chair. This council was composed of 247 bishops, of whom 187 were Italians, 32 Spaniards, 26 French, and 2 Germans, and a majority vote (124) of these men undertook to make the laws by which the millions of the human race in all lands and ages were to be bound, under fearful penalties, to accept and obey as the edicts of Almighty God ! Though Mexico to-day retains only a part of the immense area which she once called her own, yether present size is stated as " ten times larger than Great Britain, and nearly equal in extent to France, Spain, Austria, Lombardy, and the British Isles combined." The physical facts of this great country are presented by Mr. Winston as follows : It extends from about the fourteenth to the thirty-second parallel of north latitude, and from the eighty-sixth to the one hundred and seventh degree of west longitude, being in length from north to south about two thousand miles, and in breadth from one hundred and forty miles at Tehuantepec, on the south, to over a thousand miles where it joins our own southern borders. It has a sea-coast on the Gulf of Mexico of about one thousand miles, and on the Pacific Ocean and the Gulf of California of over four thousand miles. Situated to a large extent within the tropics, its coasts and the land near them possess a tropical climate, while the plains of the interior rise to an altitude of seventy-five hundred feet above the level of the sea, securing a temperate climate, although within the tropics. Thus almost every product of fruit and grain is found within its MEXICO IN TRANSITION. borders. On no island in the southern seas is there a greater luxuriance and beauty of tree and plant and flower, from the majestic palm to the creeping vines which cover the ground and trees and overrun their dwell ings, than in the south and east of Mexico, while in the north all the prod ucts of our own land can be successfully cultivated. Its silver mines have been and are the richest in the world. It has gold also, with iron and other useful metals and minerals. Its majestic snow-clad mountains, its beautiful valleys and hills, its luxuriant verdure and abundant plants present rare pictures to all true lovers of nature. The natives speak of their country as divided into three zones, the lowlands along the coast as the tierras calientes (hot lands), the range above as tierras templadas (temperate lands), and the still higher table-lands as the tierras frias (cold lands). In these last are seen those great volcanoes which are such a strik ing feature in the scenery of Mexico. The height of the five leading ones, as given by Humboldt, is : Orizava 17,879 feet. Popocatepetl 17,726 " Ixtaccihuatl 15,705 " Toluca 15,168 " Colima 12,005 " The summits of these are covered with perpetual snow. Popocatepetl and Ixtaccihuatl rise in their sublimity on the eastern side of the valley of Mexico, hoary guardians of the Aztec capital, the first towering ten thousand feet above the city. A railroad, wonderful for its engineering, that has overcome such immense difficulties of construction, winds its way up from the sea-shore at Vera Cruz to the city of Mexico, a distance of two hundred and sixty-two miles, and an elevation of seventy-five hundred feet. Some of the scenery on this road, and on other lines lately constructed down to the coast, is unsurpassed in grandeur in the world. Passing through all these zones garden products are brought to the markets of Mexico, and dwellers in that city enjoy fresh fruits and vegetables and flowers every day in the year. The sweep of the mild currents of air from the tropical ocean below, united with the rarefied air of the elevated table-lands, afford one of the most balmy and equable climates in MEXICO IN TRANSITION. the world, free from extremes, so that in the valley of Mexico the mercury seldom rises over eighty -five degrees,' or falls much below forty-five degrees, and nature seems in its growth to be a perpetual spring. This wonderful land, so gifted by nature's God, if her people were only blest with evangelical religion, and the freedom, peace, and intelligence it brings in its train, might become like " the garden of the Lord," where "thanks giving and the voice of praise " might be perpetually resounding. In 1888 Mexico had an estimated population of 11,632,924. Of these 12 per cent, are supposed to be of European extrac tion, 28 per cent, mixed, and 60 per cent, aborigines. Such is the fertility of the land that it is estimated it could sustain more than one hundred millions of population. God has bestowed with bountiful hand, so that it has been truly said, she has " every herb bearing seed, and every tree that is pleasant to the sight and good for food," while her mines are rich with the precious metals. The single fact of Mexico's mineral wealth should have saved her from her wretchedness. Ages before our Nevadas were heard, of Mexico was the wealthiest of all lands, and specialists have calculated that fully one half of the silver of commerce was extracted from her mines since the Conquest. An enumeration of the wealth from Mexican mines which passed through the custom-houses of Spain from the Conquest to 1825 gives the enormous amount of £2,040,000,000, being an annual revenue to the Spanish monarch of £6,800,000 for the three hundred years then closing.* Nor is this all, for Robertson gives his authorities for the conclusion that the sum above named is less than the amount fraudulently introduced into Spain without paying the fifth part which was the king's duty on the importation.f No wonder this profusion of treasure astonished mankind, who had hitherto gleaned a limited supply of these precious metals from the scanty stores in the mines of the eastern hemisphere. Pampered with unsanctified wealth, gained by fraud and * See King's Proclamation, printed at Havana, Sept. 6, 1831. ¦j- Robertson's History of America, p. 366, and note on p. 519. HERNANDO CORTEZ, Marquis of the Valley of Oaxaca, Conqueror of this Xew World and its first Captuiii-Crcneral, 1.721. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. oppression, Spain became proud and overbearing, rejected the Bible and the gr^at Reformation, and in the intoxication of her bigotry madly essayed to dominate the world by terrorizing weak nations, while at home she energized her abominable In quisition in the interests of her intolerant Church. She then rashly attempted to extinguish in cruelty and blood the Reforma tion in its chosen home, by invading the country of Elizabeth. The preparations for this purpose were characteristic of the monarchy which had reduced the free Aztecs to peonage and degradation, and which was exulting in the anticipation of im posing a similar yoke on the necks of Englishmen. With the money of Mexico the Armada was built and outfitted, and then ostentatiously baptized the Invincible, as it sailed away to accomplish its purpose. But in one short week the wreckage of that vast fleet was strewing the Atlantic Ocean, or dashed up on the shores of the land which sent it forth. The terrible overthrow inspired the Protestant nations to build fleets to com pete with this relentless tyrant of the seas. The Dutch and English began to prey on the commerce of their common enemy, and many a Spanish galleon had to lower her flag and resign her treasure to build up the greatness of these powers. From that time the decadence of Spain commenced, until her argosies ceased to cross the ocean and rotted within her silent ports. " The Lord had them in derision." The wealth of Mexico has continued to flow, but no longer to enrich her spoilers. It is now building up the commerce of free and evangelical nations. Twice a month the transatlantic steamer leaves Vera Cruz, bearing it away to London, where it is turned into exchange for the East, and is soon reminted in Calcutta, and circulates in India, China, and Japan. The conquest of Mexico by Hernando Cortez, in the early part of the sixteenth century, is one of the most interesting subjects in all history. To overthrow an empire like that of Montezuma with the mere handful of men whom Cortez led seems incredible. The original account of this conquest is contained in the four dispatches of Cortez to his emperor, 10 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. Charles V. The representation is one-sided ; the conquered race have never until now had the opportunity of appealing to the considerate judgment of mankind by recounting the story of their wrongs, and the cruelties which they endured from the fanatical invaders of their country. The destruction of their civilization, their monuments, their literature and records, has swept away till the judgment-day the proof which they should have possessed. Zumarraga, the first Archbishop of Mexico, was prominent among the iconoclasts who so recklessly destroyed tlieir valuable manuscripts and monuments. Brantz Mayer describes the immense bonfire that he made of all the Aztec manuscripts he could collect " in and round the city of Mexico and Tlatelolco."* Of course the "pious" soldiers in this " holy war " zealously followed the example of their chief prel ate, and so treasures which might have thrown light on the history of Mexico and of the continent, invaluable to the his torian and antiquarian, were ruthlessly consumed by these igno rant vandals. The vast number of ruins of teocallis (temples or sacred places) that still remain evidence the immense popula tion which Mexico contained at the time of the Conquest, and seem to justify the conclusion reached by Humboldt, that at that period the empire of Montezuma may have " had a population of not less than thirty millions," and " the city of Mexico a population of three hundred thousand." The Christianization of such a mass of humanity by a mere handful of military adventurers and their few clerical helpers, by the off-hand methods which they employed, frequently at the sword's point, is an awful part of the record that has come down to us. The world never before witnessed any such process as they adopted in " Christianizing " those whom their cruelty spared. Robertson gives the authority (Romish, of course) for his statement : "While this rage of conversion continued a single clergyman baptized in one day about five thousand Mexicans, and did not desist until he was so exhausted by fatigue that he was unable to lift his hands. In the course * Brantz Mayer, vol. i, p. 93. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 11 of a few years after the reduction of the Mexican Empire the sacrament of baptism was administered to more than four millions. Proselytes adopted with such inconsiderate haste, and who were neither instructed in the nature of the tenets to which it was supposed they had given assent, nor taught the absurdity of those which they were required to relinquish, retained their veneration for their ancient superstitions in full force, or mingled an attachment to their doctrines and rites with that slender knowl edge of Christianity which they had acquired. These sentiments the new converts transmitted to their posterity, into whose minds they have sunk so deep that the Spanish ecclesiastics, with all their industry, have not been able to eradicate them.* " Conversion " and " baptism " are interchangeable in the language of such people, and cases are quoted where their doc trine of " baptismal regeneration " enabled two of their mis sionaries to boast that " their ordinary day's work was from ten to twenty thousand souls ! " The " fruits " of such a Christian ity are manifest to-day in Mexico, as they have been for three hundred years past, and Humboldt is fully justified in his state ment when he says : The introduction of the Romish religion had no other effect upon the Mexicans than to substitute new ceremonies and symbols for the rites of a sanguinary worship. Dogma has not succeeded dogma, but only cere mony to ceremony. I have seen them, marked and adorned with tink ling bells, perform savage dances around the altar while a monk of St. Francis elevated the Host. And equally true is Dr. Abbot's sad conclusion, that Christianity, instead of fulfilling its mission of enlightening, converting, and sanctifying the natives, was itself converted. Paganism was baptized, Christianity paganized. Cortez was not above the temptation to represent his oppo nents in the worst possible light and to magnify greatly his own victories as well as the number and character of those opposed to him, in order to dazzle his government and his countrymen with the splendor of his services and the proportionate rewards that were due to him, and those who served with him in his crusade against a peaceable nation in the ends of the earth, who * Robertson's America, p. 364. 12 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. had offered him neither wrong nor insult, and of whose hospi tality he took the meanest advantages and then punished their heroic defense with robbery, slavery, and death ! But who then dared to doubt the correctness of the narrations by Cortez ? Every document for the public eye had first to be submitted to the examination of the official censor, and without his license no work could be published. Cortez was too useful as a son of the Church and too valuable as a subject of the crown to have any of his statements qualified or denied. Bernal Diaz (one of his associates and a historian of the Conquest) ventures in a very meek way to withhold his approval of some such state ments, in these words : It may be that the person whom Gomara mentions as having appeared on a mottled gray horse was the glorious apostle San Jago or San Pedro, and that I as being a sinner, was not worthy to see him. This I know, that I saw Juan Francisco de Morla on such a horse, but, as an unworthy transgressor, did not deserve to see any of the holy apostles. It may have been the will of God ; that it was so as Gomara relates, but until I read his chronicle I never heard among any of the conquerors that such a thing had happened. (Chap, xxxiv.) The statements of Cortez went forth accepted as facts by the " Holy Office," and were commended to the belief of the un educated millions of Spain. The emblazoned cross upon his standard covered even the claims of miraculous assistance, the presence of the saints (St. James and St. Peter especially) with his army, and " the inspiration of the Holy Ghost," to guide in his policy. All of which is indorsed by no less an authority than Lorenzana, Archbishop of Mexico, in his Notes on the Letters of Cortez, published in 1770. To eulogize such a man as a "saintly " character was an insult to the moral sense of even worldly men. The glamour of his course has now departed, and candid criticism has weighed him in her balance and found him wanting. Abundant evidence — much of it under his own hand — has shown him to have been impure, untruthful, avaricious, and cruel, and to-day his character is most discounted where he was best known. The races which he so deeply wronged MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 13 execrate his memory, and one of their first acts as freemen was to raise the question whether the soil of their land should shel ter his remains, so that hastily and secretly his ashes were re moved, to avoid the indignities to which the excited people might have subjected them ! If any desire evidence to satisfy them that this is not too strong condemnation of his character, let them turn to the authorities given below (all from Roman Catholic writers), which are but samples of the many such tes timonies which could be added.* The exaggerations of Cortez and his followers were on a scale with their barbarities, and constitute a perpetual difficulty for all who attempt to describe his conquest. Time and closer exam ination only intensify this difficulty and throw a deeper shade over their credibility. Nearly all visitors to Mexico who have studied the subject, even partially, find themselves led to doubt the amazing statements of the Dispatches and become con vinced that Prescott should have discriminated in regard to many of these wild assertions of Cortez. We have not room to spare for the many illustrative instances at hand, but in pass ing we will note that the victory of Otumba, after the night of dreadful loss, called the Noche Triste (or Sad Night), where four or five hundred exhausted men are said to have conquered "more than one hundred thousand" Aztecs, may be regarded as on a par with his story of the "one hundred and thirty-six thousand skulls of the victims of the teocalli," which he says he saw there, or the equally incredible number of human sacrifices offered yearly on their reeking altars.f Even Clav igero, the Jesuit historian of Mexico, is forced to pause and decline to set down such monstrous figures in his history. £ But, on the contrary, he states that "the victors [Spaniards], in one year of merciless massacre, sacrificed more human vic tims to avarice and ambition than the Indians, during the * Dispatches of Cortez, pp. 362, 398, 405. Robertson's History of the Discovery and Settlement of America, pp. 252, 257, 485, 488, 494. \ Helps's Life of Cortez, vol. ii, p. 305. X History of Mexico, by Abbe F. S. Clavigero, vol. i, p. 281. 14 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. existence of their empire, devoted in chaste worship to their native gods." * Cortez's own lips have furnished the real secret to his charac ter, and proves that " the cursed lust for gold " was the leading motive that impelled him. Without hesitation he relates the following incident. At an entertainment which he gave to the officers of Montezuma on his first journey from the coast to the city of Mexico he inquired of them if tlieir emperor had any gold, and, being answered in the affirmative, Cortez said : " Let him send it to me, for I and my companions have a complaint, a disease of the heart, which' is cured by gold." f Montezuma soon sent all that he could spare, hoping to get rid of the un welcome visitor, but he had not enough to " cure" the disease. It was a spasm of the same complaint, when he had captured the valiant Cuatemoctzin, the nephew and successor of Monte zuma, who led the defense of the city when the emperor was a prisoner, that induced Cortez to commit the fearful crime that will forever stain the records of his great conquest. The booty which fell into his hands was so small, " only one hundred and twenty thousand pesos gold," that he believed Cuatemoctzin had secreted the treasure, and therefore ordered the princely man to be tortured, with his chief noble, by roasting their feet before a strong fire. The noble died under the torture, which was then suspended in the case of Cuatemoctzin, only to be renewed later, before he was hung by the conqueror, for refusing to reveal the secret. \ So far from being ashamed of this diabolical act, the anniversary of the capture of Cuatemoctzin and the fall of the city which he so valiantly defended was regularly celebrated „_during the three hundred years of Spanish rule, till the inde- 1 pendence, in 1821, brought the native race to the front and terminated the insulting celebration. With such ample facts before us, what are we to think of the indorsement given to Cortez by Archbishop Lorenzana (already mentioned), who * History of Mexico, by Abbe F. S. Clavigero, vol. ii, p. 194. f Helps's Life of Cortez, vol. i, p. 56. X Robertson's History, pp. 252, 257. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 15 annotated the Dispatches of Cortez to Charles V. ? In his clos ing note he says : The Conquest took place in 1521, and in three years after Cortez, in this dispatch, speaks as if fifty years of wise government had elapsed. I shall ever reverence Cortez, and respect his name as that of a civil, mil itary, and religious hero, unexampled in his career ; a subject who bore the freaks of fortune with fortitude and constancy, and a man destined by God to add to the possessions of the Catholic king a new and larger world. (P. 431.) We pause to note how completely the judgment of the arch bishop was reversed by the divine providence. All that Cortez established has been swept away, to the last remnant of the des potic civilization imposed upon the long-suffering race, whose enlightened sons are once more in possession of their country. On the 21st of August, 1889, the Mexicans dedicated on the Paseo de la Reforma — the magnificent drive leading from the city to the palace of Chapultepec — a colossal bronze statue of Cuatemoctzin, in honor of their valiant prince and last emperor. One of the largest assemblies of the aborigines ever seen in Mex ico city was present to witness the solemnities, each bearing his garland to grace the monument which memorializes their de liverance from ages of bitter humiliation. The triumphant ora tion was pronounced in the Aztec language by Colonel Don Prospero Cahuantzin, Governor of the State of Tlaxcala. The national anthem was enthusiastically sung and the royal salute of twenty-one guns thundered out, during which President Diaz advanced and laid a wreath of roses and laurel at the foot of the statue. Need we wonder that Cuatemoctzin's race is now claim ing a reversal of many of those popular opinions on the Con quest which Spanish historians and those who were misdirected by them, have imposed on the world as the facts of history ? In settling down to enjoy the results of their unjust invasion the Conquistadores (as Cortez and his associates then were called) adopted a social system of a very oppressive character. Large, portions of the land were parceled out into immense estates, and titles were conferred upon their Spanish owners, 16 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. while the millions of the Aztec race were reduced to a condition of peonage. In the center of each estate haciendas (forti fied farm-houses) were erected ; and here the natives had to live under the eye of the owner, or of his administrator, when the owner was non-resident, as was frequently the case. The owner, called a hacendado, fixed the rate of wages and re quired the peons to draw their supplies from his store, giving him a double profit on their toil. A church was also erected, a Spanish priest appointed to the charge, pledged to add spiritual authority to sustain the claims of the hacendado. The Domin ican monks were introduced, and under their administration branches of the Spanish Inquisition were established in the cities of Mexico and Puebla, for the repression of all dissent and the punishment of any heresy. Under the weight of this Spanish civilization the conquered race began their new life. Without education, on the most scanty subsistence, without owning the miserable hut of a single room that sheltered them, they dragged on for three centuries, ranking among the most ignorant and hopeless of the human race. Laws were passed by the viceroys, who were appointed by the King of Spain, to suit the situation, one of which was that the peons of one haci enda were not at liberty to transfer themselves to another with out the written, permit of the hacendado or his agent, if they were in debt to the amount of twenty dollars. The estate own ers took good care that their hands should be in debt to this extent all the time, so as to secure the control of their labor. Worse than this, many of these wretched people were formally reduced to the condition of absolute slavery, and some were even branded as such with the owner's initials by a red-hot iron women as well as men !* while the middle class, the real back bone of the nation, perished from the land. It is no wonder that Las Casas, the Bishop of Chiapas, pro tested so earnestly against his countrymen's barbarities, which he declared threatened to exterminate the Aztec race, nor that he twice crossed the Atlantic to lay the sorrowful story of their * Wilson's Mexico, p. 209. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 17 wrongs before Ferdinand and Charles V. A grateful Mexican artist — Felix Parra — has immortalized the good bishop's human ity in that famous picture which occupies the place of honor in the Academy of Fine Arts in the city of Mexico. It is entitled " Las Casas Protecting the Indians," and represents the venera ble man standing, while at his feet is the bleeding body of an Aztec, whose anguished wife clings to his robe as he raises the cross for their protection, and his face, uplifted, is illumined as he appeals to Heaven for help for the oppressed. Who that has looked upon that pleading countenance can ever forget it ? The historians of the Conquest admit that the merciless Span iards subjected not only the common people to these barbarous conditions of life, but also many of the caziques — nobles and governors — were degraded to the condition of peonage on ' the haciendas or to work in the mines. The monks of the Franciscan order were soon imported to Catholicize the native people and thus complete the work of Cortez. Magnificent endowments were provided for this order to carry on this work, until their head-quarters in the center of the city of Mexico became one of the most extensive and wealthy monastic institutions in Christendom. A hundred years after Cortez reached Mexico, with this creed and civilization, the Pilgrim Fathers landed on Plym outh Rock, and, notwithstanding all the natural disadvan tages, from which Mexico is so happily free, they planted a faith and a freedom which have made the wilderness, the ster ile soil, and the rock-bound coast a true commonwealth, and consolidated a glorious civilization of peace, intelligence, and prosperity without a rival on earth — the very reverse of the debasement to which Spain and Rome degraded Montezuma's race and country. If the Romish Church became an utter fail ure in Mexico, as well as in Central and South America, that failure cannot be accounted for at a future day by any lack of material or adequate, even absolute, power for the accomplish ment of the purposes to which Christianity aspires. She secured also boundless resources by means which she alone em- 18 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. ploys; she chose her methods, took all the time necessary to workout the results, and the world sees and laments her failure. Notwithstanding her efforts to conceal the vast accumula tions she had been sweeping into her treasuries for three hun dred years, rendering no account to the nation, either as to their extent or use, deliberately and contemptuously refusing to con tribute a single dollar toward the public burdens, while claim ing all immunities, some approximation of the amount had been made manifest to the nation she had so impoverished, and successive governments have investigated in the hope that some portion of it might be made to fulfill its duty in helping bear the public burdens, especially when it became apparent that the lay estate could no longer carry all, or save the State from bankruptcy. The most successful of these efforts was made by the Liberal government in 1850, when Sefior Lerdo, then minister of public works, compiled a synopsis of the Mexican hierarchy, of the religious houses, their endowments, revenues, salaries, etc. While he could approximate very closely in regard to the mon asteries, nunneries, their inmates, and the ecclesiastical staff, it was still in the power of the clericals to evade his investigations in regard to the bulk of the church property of Rome in Mexico, which they alone knew, and which for so many years they were using to fight against freedom in the land. Sefior Lerdo's exhibit was approved by the " Mexican Society of Geography and Statistics " as worthy of public confidence, and it created a sensation. Men knew that but a part of the resources of this foreign Church was laid bare, but what had been ascertained revealed vast sums lavished upon institutions and orders of indolent, ignorant monks and nuns, who were con suming in idleness wealth for want of which their poor suffer ing countrymen were steeped in poverty and their government without resources. It was then calculated that the Church of Rome owned " 861 estates valued at $71,000,000, and 22,000 city lots at $113,000,000— a total of $184,000,000." Some writers value the property thus held at $300,000,000, and the MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 19 yearly income at $25,000,000, while the floating capital under the control of the archbishop and his chapter amounted to about $20,000,000, and was employed largely in loans and mortgages. The money power wielded by the Church was only second to her spiritual power, and she had a practical monopoly of both. Even as late as 1873, when we entered Mexico, there were only two or three banks in the republic. Yet there was plenty of money to be loaned, and at moderate rates of interest. For security they preferred bonds and mortgages, the expectation being that before the spirit left the dying frame influences could be brought to bear to lead the owner to leave a suitable part to be used for masses for his soul. Seiior Lerdo estimates the amount consumed in the main tenance of the 3,223 ecclesiastics was annually $20,000,000, besides the large amounts expended in the repairs and orna ments of an enormous number of churches. In 1793 the twelve bishops had $539,000 appropriated to their support, but now their revenues are so mixed up with the revenues of the Church that it is impossible to say how much these twelve " successors of the apostles " appropriate for their support.* Of this sum, it is understood, the Archbishop of Mexico received as his yearly salary $130,000, the Bishop of Puebla and Valla dolid (Morelia) $110,000 each, and the rest in due proportion. These facts led several competent men to investigate the sub ject. Their substantial agreement renders it unnecessary that we should add statements to the representations which we have quoted and which are accepted in Mexico as sufficiently near to the facts of the case for all needful information. As to the object for which these means were employed and the power that they conferred to accomplish them, Mr. Wilson remarks, in 1854 : In place of the Inquisition, which the reformed Spanish government took away from the Church of Mexico, the Church now wields the power of wealth, almost fabulous in amount, which is practically in the hands of * Mexico To-day, by Brocklehurst. London, 1883. Mexico, 1861-62, by Dr. Lempriere. Wilson's Mexico, p. 322. 20 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. a close corporation sole. The influence of the arc/Mshop, as the substantial owner of nearly half the property in the city of Mexico, gives him a power over his tenants unknown under our system of laws. Besides this a large portion of the church property is in money, and the archbishop is the great loan and trust company of Mexico. Nor is this power by any means an insignificant one. A bankrupt government is overawed by it. Men of intellect are crushed into silence, and no opposition can successfully stand against the influence of the Church Lord, who carries in his hand the treasures of heaven and in his money-bags the material that moves the world. To understand the full force of his power of money it must be borne in mind that Mexico is a country proverbial for recklessness in all conditions of life ; for extravagant living and extravagant equipages ; a country where a man's position in society is determined by the state he maintains ; a country the basis of whose wealth is the mines of precious metal, where princely fortunes are quickly acquired and suddenly lost, and where hired labor has hardly a cash value. In such a country the power and influence of money has a meaning beyond any idea we can form. Look at a prominent man making an ostentatious display of his devotion ; his example is of advantage to the Church, and the Church may be of advantage to him, for it has an abundance of money at six per cent. per annum, while the outside money-lenders charge him two per cent, per month. The Church, too, may have a mortgage upon his house overdue; and woe betide him if he should undertake a crusade against the Church. This is a string that the Church can pull upon, which is strong enough to overawe government itself. (P. 323.) What has she to show the impoverished nation for these hundreds of millions which she has extracted from it ? A peo ple without intelligence or morality or self-respect, steeped to the lips in ignorance, poverty, and peonage as the Mexicans were thirty years ago, and had been ever since the Conquest. What became of all this wealth? Two or three quota tions' will indicate for what purposes it has been so prodigally employed, while the poor nation from which it was taken was perishing for the improved conditions which that wealth would surely have brought. Instead of that, this is the use of it in which they have gloried. Madame Calderon writes : Innumerable were the churches we visited that evening. . . . The cathe dral (in Mexico city) was the first we entered, and its magnificence struck us with amazement. Its gold and silver and jewels, its innumerable orna- MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 21 ments and holy vessels, the rich dresses of the priests, all seemed burning with almost intolerable brightness. The high altar was the most mag nificent; the second, with its pure white marble pillars, the most impos ing. . . . Each church had vied with the others in putting forth all its splendors of jewelry, of lights, of dresses, and of music. . . . There are be tween sixty and eighty others, some of them possessing little less wealth than the cathedral. (P. 108.) We were also shown the jewels, which they keep buried in case of a revolution. The custodia, the gold stand in which they carry the Host, is entirely incrusted with large diamonds, pearls, emeralds, amethysts, topazes, and rubies. The chalices are equally rich. There are four sets of jewels for the bishop. One of his crosses is of emeralds and diamonds, another of topazes and diamonds, with great rings of the same belonging to each. (P. 274.) To the right of the altar of the Cathedral of Puebla is the gem of the building. It is a figure of the Virgin Mary, near the size of life. Dressed in the richest embroidered satin, she displays strings of the largest pearls, hanging from her neck to below her knees. Around her brow is clasped a crown of gold, inlaid with emeralds of marvelous size. Her waist is bound with a zone of diamonds, from the center of which blaze numbers of enormous brilliants. To cap this climax we need only quote one more testimony concerning the shrine In which rest the figure of the "Virgin of Remedios," who enjoys the exclusive right, amid her other treasures, to three petticoats, one of them embroidered with pearls, another with emeralds, and a third with diamonds, the value of which is credibly stated at not less than three millions of dollars. In addition to all this wealth hidden in her churches, Rome increased the burdens upon the nation by her monastic system, which she jealously secluded from any governmental inspection, or the influence of public opinion as to the personnel, property, or the rights and liberties of the thousands around whom she erected those massive walls. Sefior Lerdo's statistics give their number. How fearful is the fact stated by Robertson : " In the city of Mexico alone there are more than fifty convents, male and female, containing three thousand three hundred indi viduals" (p. 515). The unfortunate city had borne this load 22 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. for centuries notwithstanding all her protests. In proof of this Robertson adds : In the year 1644 the city of Mexico presented a petition to the King of Spain, praying that no new monastery be founded, and that the revenues of those already established might be circumscribed ; otherwise the relig ious houses would soon acquire the property of the whole country. . . . The abuse must have been enormous indeed, when even the bigoted Span ish Americans were induced to remonstrate against them. He also states that these numerous clergy " were generally native Spaniards, devoted to the interests of the king, the Church, and the Inquisition, passing their lives in criminal indulgence or luxurious repose." The Spaniards took good care to reserve all the positions of their political system, as well as the ease of the monastic establishments for men of their own race, and systematically excluded all Aztecs from the priesthood. Clavigero took exception to this statement of Dr. Robertson, but on referring the question to Madrid the representations were amply vindicated (p. 518), It was a foreign priesthood from first to last that wrought out the sad condition that we deplore in Mexico. Let us contemplate a single item of this heavy burden which dragged so long upon the resources of the land. Of the fifty convents, in the capital alone, the most important and wealthy was that of San Francisco. We speak of this one from our per sonal knowledge. It was in the center of the city, and covered an area equivalent to four large blocks of ground. It con tained an immense church and four suffragan chapels. In the cen ter was a magnificent patio, or cloister, where the monks prome naded, which, with its pillars and carved arches, must have cost a very large amount of money to erect. There were also residences of the superior, refectories, gardens, and orchards, with suitable equipments, the whole inclosed with massive walls. Its re sources were so ample that it was regarded as the most wealthy monastic establishment in the New World, with few, if any, in the Old World to surpass it. In this establishment, as in all the rest of its kind throughout MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 23 the land, millions of the money of Mexico, extracted from its people by many questionable expedients, were locked up in costly buildings, while other millions were invested so as to yield large revenues for the luxurious use of the Spanish eccle siastics who occupied them. They scorned the idea of owing any responsibility for their vast revenues or paying taxation toward the support of the government of the country, while they were ever ready to furnish funds to aid every effort to crush the party of freedom in order to perpetuate their own exclusive privileges. When the Liberals at last struggled up to power, and had to face the question, and under Benito Juarez became strong enough to enforce the decree of sequestration, in spite of the stubborn defense of the church party, which re fused all compromise and threatened the government and the Congress with all the maledictions and ghostly penalties in their power, they began with this monastery of San Francisco, by a demand for admission and the keys. From within the monks refused. The general commanding sent for the engineer corps of his brigade, and led them to the center of the outer wall, where it was about twelve or fourteen feet high. Ladders were raised, and with pickax and crowbar the great stones were soon loos ened. They broke down the wall to the ground, and while part remained to clear away the debris the rest went across the garden and began their work on the opposite wall, and when this was open a street, now known as Calle de Independencia, was completed right through the establishment. The monks were then informed that the government was in possession, and that they must leave. A small pension was assigned them for their old age. The fraudulent aspect of the whole affair was laid bare when it was discovered that this massive establishment and its revenues were monopolized by the fourteen old monks who stood there before the Liberal general ! The place was mapped out and divided into lots to suit pur chasers, as were more than one hundred and fifty similar com munities, and was turned to all sorts of uses — dwellings, schools, stores, florist's garden, places of amusement, and of manufact- 24 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. ure. Being so many, they were sold at prices ridiculously low, considering their original cost. It became the duty of the writer to purchase a portion of this property of this San Francisco establishment, for our mission purposes, the part of it already mentioned as the "cloisters," for which we paid $16,300. The extent of the monastery may be imagined from the statement that this portion, though one hundred and eighty feet in depth, was not more than one fiftieth part of the property which had sheltered so many generations of lazy monks who added nothing- to the resources of the country, but lived and died like " Idle drones, Born to consume the produce of the soil." No wonder the freemen of Mexico wished to end this folly and deliver Mexico from the incubus of their presence. The archbishop protested, and threatened excommunication, but when all was done tried to force the purchasers into the con cession of paying a second- price to him as a condition of release from his interdicts, and giving the sanction of the Church to their title. A very few timid souls may have yielded to the illegal demand. The writer was artfully approached with the same purpose, but promptly declined to discredit the govern ment of the republic by any such concession. The great wealth she so long enjoyed corrupted the Church. In her self-sufficiency she arranged to elevate herself above all responsibility to any other power, and claimed inviolability and immunity from secular jurisdiction. The clericals should be amenable only to clerical courts, not merely for their own per sons, but their property as well — a repetition of the prerogatives insisted on by the clergy of the mediaeval ages, as lately shown by H. C. Lea, in his History of the Inquisition. These priv ileges were denominated fueros, under which They established courts, in which every question relating to their own character, their functions, their property, was tried and pleaded, and ob tained almost total exemption from the authority of civil law and civil judges.* * Robertson's Charles V., p. 34. THE PLAZA, OR GREAT SQUARE, OF MEXICO. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 25 This position, under which she could not be called to an}^ re sponsibility by the State, immensely increased her power for doing mischief. With her abundance of money and the co operation of the aristocracy, and the service of her partisans of every class, bound to her by all motives in heaven and earth, this ecclesiastical despotism dominated Mexico. It knew the price of the corrupt generals, and could furnish the funds for a " pronunciamento," under which the liberal administration of the hour would be overthrown, and the executive that replaced it would be required to furnish assurance that ecclesiastical mat ters should be held paramount in his administration. We have in our possession a body of photographs, fifty-two in number, portraits of the persons who have governed Mexico, under various titles, during the fifty-eight years from 1821 to 1879. Let three of these be deducted of those who ruled longest, Juarez, Maximilian, and Diaz, nearly seventeen years between them ; there remain then fifty governors for forty-one years, or an average reign to each of about nine months and twenty-one days. The terrible fact is that each of these frequent changes was the result of a "pronunciamento," a conflict, bloodshed, and waste of money. It may be asked here whether there is a par allel to this atrocious case in all the history of Christendom. Most of these sudden and expensive changes transpired in the great plaza, or square, shown in the opposite picture. This is the most historic spot in all Mexico. To the left is the great cathedral, built on the site of the Teocalli, or Temple, of Mon tezuma, so often referred to in the histories, and where so much of the wealth of the Church is stored. Back from the garden and where the flag waves is the National Palace, frequently called the "Halls of Montezuma." To the right, and under the tall flag, is the Municipal Palace, where the city govern ment and courts are situated. The whole area is very extensive and is a great center of business and wealth. Leaving the past out of view for the time, we present, from unquestioned evidence, some samples of their peculiar Catholi cism and its practices, which will explain the degradation into 26 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. which Mexico has sunk. In doing this very little Protestant testimony will be quoted — as some of our readers might hardly resist the fear that such representations would be prejudiced — nor will any Roman Catholic evidence be presented except that of the highest character. The two witnesses whose testimony will abundantly prove on this ground the necessity of introducing the reformed faith into Mexico are both of the highest class, prominent Romanists, one from Spain and the other from France. The witness from Spain is a lady, the accomplished wife of the first Spanish embassador to Mexico, Madame Calderon De La Barca. The reader is aware that as a result of the Avars of the first Napoleon and the state of things inaugurated in Spain by him something approaching constitutional rule was established there — the Inqui sition was abolished both in Spain and her dependencies. Mexico felt the thrill of the better day and welcomed it heartily, and before the despotism of the Spanish monarch, Ferdinand VIL, could be restored, Mexico proclaimed her independence, which was finally achieved in 1822. A feeble attempt was made to regain the lost province, but that failed, and Mexico was hence forth to govern herself as well as she could, amid the struggle with the Church and the aristocracy against the people. For fifteen years Spain remained aggrieved, wlien, finding she was only doing herself disadvantage by refusing to open diplomatic relations with her revolted dependency, she concluded, in 1839, to forget her wounded pride, and, acknowledging the independence of Mexico, appointed a minister to represent her. The choice fell upon Senor Calderon De La Barca, who was well suited for the purpose. His wife was eminently fitted to adorn her high position by a splendid education, her many accomplish ments, and other qualities which enabled her to fill most accept ably the delicate duties of her position. Coming by the United States, they left their daughters at school in New York, and reached Mexico in December of 1839, where they were received in the most cordial manner by the government and the people. Madame Calderon became a special favorite, and MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 27 was indeed a privileged person. She was truly devout as well as accomplished. The clergy were delighted with her, and she had the entree to every thing that a lady might see and study during the nearly three years that their term of office lasted. She was regarded as lending the luster of the Spanish court and aristocracy to the society of Mexico by her presence and courtesies. Meanwhile, to interest her daughters, she wrote a regular series of letters, giving them full particulars of all she was privileged to see and enjoy, without any expectation that they would ever go into print. But W. H. Prescott, the historian, had meanwhile made the acquaintance of the family, and was allowed to hear these interesting letters. He recommended so earnestly that such rich stores of instruction and amusement should not be reserved for the eyes of a few friends only, but that they should be given to the world, that after Madame Calderon's return from Mexico she consented to do so, having made such alterations and omissions as were necessary in a private cor respondence. They were accordingly published in a volume under the title Life in Mexico. How little she imagined the tumult of feeling the publication would cause among the clericals of Mexico ! And yet there is not a bitter word or a false accusa tion in the whole book ; nor could she imagine that the simple truth would hurt either their feelings or their interests. Yet it did, though so gently spoken, because they did not wish the light let in upon their doings. The other person whose testimony is so important in regard to the state of things in Mexico was the Abbe Emanuel Domenech, chaplain of the French Expeditionary Force, the trusted representative of Napoleon III., of whose admissions we shall have more to say later on, when we reach the " Interven tion " period, but whom we here introduce for his testimony in regard to what he found in Mexico after the failure of the French, and the death of Maximilian, when, his first office hav ing ended, he was required before leaving Mexico to go through the land on a tour of observation, and report on the truth of the rumors which had reached the outside world as to the low 28 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. moral and religious condition of the clergy and Church of Rome in Mexico. This duty he fulfilled thoroughly, and on his return published his report in Paris, in 1867, entitled Mexico As It Is, the Truth Respecting its Climate, its Inhabitants, and its Govern ment. His account is a fearful record. Nothing worse, prob ably, was ever published of a Church and people than what his pages contain. And yet the abbe was a prominent clergyman of the Romish Church of France, describing the clergy and people of the same Church in Mexico. The book was published in French, and was evidently not intended for the Protestant eye. As to the character of the religious sentiments which the Mexican clergy have so long fostered and still sustain, the abbe, writing in 1867, says : Mexican faith is a dead faith. The abuse of external ceremonies, the facility of reconciling the devil with God, the absence of internal exercises of piety, have hilled the faith in Mexico. It is in vain to seek good fruit from the worthless tree, which makes Mexican religion a singular as semblage of heartless devotion, shameful ignorance, insane superstition, and hideous vice. . . . The idolatrous character of Mexican Catholicism is a fact well known to all travelers. The worship of saints and madon nas so absorbs the devotion of the people that little time is left to think about God. Religious ceremonies are performed with a most lamentable indifference and want of decorum. The Indians go to hear mass with their poultry and vegetables which they are carrying to market. I have had to abandon the Cathedral of Mexico, where I used to go every morn ing, because I could not collect my thoughts there. The gobble of the turkeys, the crowing of cocks, the barking of dogs, the mewing of cats, the chirping of birds in their nests in the ceiling, and the flea- bites rendered meditation impossible to me, unaccustomed to live in such a menagerie. . . . One day I was present at an Indian dance, celebrated in honor of the patron saint of the village. Twenty-four boys and girls were dancing in the church, in the presence of the priest. An Indian, with his face concealed under a mask of an imaginary divinity resembling the devil, with horns and claws, was directing the figures of the dance which reminded me of that of the Redskins ! I remarked to the priest^ who, for all that, was an excellent priest, that it was very incongruous to permit such a frolic in a church. " The old customs," he replied, "are respectable; it is well to preserve them, only taking care that they do not degenerate into orgies." MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 29 During holy week I have seen processions of three thousand persons stripped and covered only with sackcloth, so coarse as to show that the individual had not even a shirt. The different phases of the passion of Christ were represented by groups of painted statues large as life, and by men and women placed upon stages, borne on the shoulders of hundreds of Indians. The bearers, bending under the weight of their burden, would go, from time to time, to refresh themselves at the liquor shops, leaving in the middle of the streets the groups representing the passion. Jews and Romans, decked with helmets of tin plate, breastplates of paste board, and breeches embroidered with silver, made a part of the procession. The mysteries of the Middle Ages are utterly outdone by the burlesque ceremonies of the Mexicans. The accouchement of the Virgin on Christ mas night appears to me indecent. In France the police would forbid the ceremony as a shock to public morals. But public morality being a thing unknown in Mexico the custom of representing the accouchement of the Virgin iu many of the churches offends no one. But we forbear any further quotations from this paragraph. The abbe finds himself forced to the sad conclusion, after their three hundred years of opportunity, which he expresses in the two sentences following : It would require volumes to relate the Indian superstitions of an idola trous character which exist to this day. For want of serious instruction you find in the Catholicism of the Indians numerous remains of the old Aztec paganism. The observations I have made of the religious sentiments of the Mexicans are not confined to the ignorant classes. They apply equally to those who are well-to-do.* As further samples of their religious practices we take from Madame Calderon's work the following extracts : All Mexicans at present, men and women, are engaged in what are called the desagravios, a public penance performed at this season in the churches during thirty-five days. The women attend church in the morning, no man being permitted to enter, and men in the evening, when women are not permitted. Both rules are occasionally broken. The other night I was present at a much stranger scene, at the discipline performed by the men, admission having been procured for us by certain means, private but powerful. Accordingly, when it was dark, enveloped from head to foot in large cloaks, and without the slightest idea of what * See Mexico and the United States, by Gorman D. Abbot, p. 203, etc. 30 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. it was, we went on foot through the streets to the Church of San Augus- tin. . . . The scene was curious. About one hundred and fifty men, en veloped in cloaks and serapes, their faces entirely concealed, were assem bled in the body of the church. A monk had just mounted the pulpit, and the church was dimly lighted, except where he stood in bold relief, with his gray robes and cowl thrown back, giving a full view of his high bald forehead and expressive face. His discourse was a rude but very forcible and eloquent description of the torments prepared in hell for impenitent sinners. The effect of the whole was very solemn. It appeared like a preparation or the execu tion of a multitude of condemned criminals. When the discourse was fin ished they all joined in prayer with much fervor and enthusiasm, beating their breasts and falling upon their faces. Then the monk stood up and in a very distinct voice read several passages of Scripture descriptive of the sufferings of Christ. The organ then struck up the Miserere, and all of a sudden the church was plunged in profound darkness, all but a sculptured representation of the crucifixion, which seemed to hang in the air illuminated. I felt rather frightened, and would have been very glad to leave the church, but it would have been impossible in the darkness. Suddenly a terrible voice in the dark cried, "My brothers, when Christ was fastened to the pillar by the Jews he was scourged ! " At these words the bright figure disappeared and the darkness became total. Suddenly we heard the souud of hundreds of scourges descending upon the bare flesh. I cannot conceive any thing more horrible. Before ten minutes had passed the sound became splashing, from the blood that was flowing. Incredible as it may seem, this awful penance continued, without in termission, for half an hour ! If they scourged each other their energy might be less astonishing. We could not leave the church, but it was perfectly sickening ; and had I not been able to take hold of the Senora 's hand, and feel something human beside me, I could have fancied myself transported into a congregation of evil spirits. Now and then, but very seldom, a sup pressed groan was heard, and occasionally the voice of the monk encour aging them by ejaculations or by short passages of Scripture. Sometimes the organ struck up, and the poor wretches, in a faint voice, tried to join in the Miserere. The sound of the scourging is indescribable. At the end of half an hour a little bell was rung, and the voice of the monk was heard calling upon them to desist; but such was their enthusiasm that the horrible lashing continued louder and fiercer than ever. In vain he entreated them not to kill themselves, and assured them that Heaven would be satisfied and that human nature could not endure beyond a certain point. No answer but the loud sound of the scourges. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 31 which are, many of them, of iron, with sharp points that enter the flesh. At length, as if they were perfectly exhausted, the sound grew fainter, and little by little ceased altogether. We then got up, and with great diffi culty groped our way in the pitch darkness through the galleries and down the stairs till we reached the door and had the pleasure of feeling the fresh air again. They say that the church floor is frequently covered with blood after one of those penances, and that a man died the other day in consequence of his wounds."* In the Santa Teresa convent, in the refectory . . . they showed us a crown of thorns, which on certain days is worn by one of their number by way of penance. It is made of iron, so that the nails, entering inward, run into the head and make it bleed. . . . We visited the different cells, and were horror-struck at the self-inflicted tortures. Each bed consists of a wooden plank raised in the middle, and on days of penance crossed by wooden bars. The pillow is wooden, with a cross lying on it, which they hold in their hands when they lie down. The nun lies on this penitential couch, embracing the cross, and her feet hanging out, as the bed is made too short for her upon principle. Round her waist she occasionally wears a band with iron points turning inward ; on her breast a cross with nails, of which the points enter the flesh, of the truth of which I had melancholy ocular demonstration. Thus, after hav ing scourged herself with a whip covered with iron nails, she lies down for a few hours on the wooden bars, and rises at four o'clock. All these in struments of discipline, which each nun keeps in a little box beside her bed, look as if their fitting place would be in the dungeons of the Inquisition. They made me try their bed and board, which I told them would give me a very decided taste for early rising.f These are some of the ceremonies of modern Romanism in Mexico. My readers can imagine what St. Paul would have said had he stood with Madame Calderon on these occasions and had been asked if this were Christianity. Or the prophet Elijah, to whom it might have recalled the dreadful scene on Mount Carmel, when confronted by the one hundred and fifty priests of Baal, who " cried aloud and cut themselves with knives and lancets until the blood gushed out upon them." Was the above scene any higher, as worship or atonement, than what we missionaries witness of the self- * Life in Mexico, by Madame Calderon, p. 213. Chapman &, Hall, London, 1843. f Ibid., pp. 223, 224. 32 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. torturing fakirs in India? Nay, verily, they are alike heathen abominations in the sight of God, and of no value to the soul. We brought from Mexico a full set of these instruments of tort ure, purchased from those who had used them. They are blood stained and rusty from use, and are here presented photographed on a reduced scale. The set includes five articles. Number 1 is the scourge referred to by Madame Calderon, and is used in the more public penance, which she was allowed, as a special favor, to witness. It is about eighteen inches long, and the steel points project a full half inch on all sides. The lash is swept over both shoulders and strikes down to the waist. Numbers 3, 4, and 5 are for more private infliction, and are worn under the clothing. Number 2 is a circlet, called " the crown," for the head, the points being about an eighth of an inch long, and is to be tightened around the head. Number 3 and the rest have points nearly a quarter of an inch long, and are designed for the arms and limbs. Number 5 is for the waist, and has a strong buckle at the end, by which it may be tightened as much as the poor sufferer can endure. The tighter they are worn the more meritorious is the penance. So unmercifully are they used that they often make the blood trickle down into the stockings and shoes ! Now let us hear the abbe further as to the character of the' religion which is professed in connection with these ceremo nies. He says : The Mexican is not a Catholic ; he is simply a Christian, because he has been baptized. I speak of the masses, and not of the numerous excep tions to be met with in all classes of society. I say that Mexico is not a Catholic country : 1. Because a majority of the native population are semi-idolaters. 2. Because the majority of the Mexicans carry ignorance of religion to such a point that they have no other worship than that of form. It is materialism without a doubt. They do not know what it is to worship God in spirit and in truth, according to the Gospel. ... If the pope should abolish all simoniacal livings, and excommunicate all the priests having concubines, the Mexican clergy would be reduced to a very small affair. Nevertheless, there are some worthy men among them, whose THE " DlSCIPLlNAS,' Used on the body for self-torture. THE " DlSCIPLlNAS," Used on the body for self-torture. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 33 conduct as priests is irreproachable. ... In all Spanish America there are found, among the priests, the veriest wretches — knaves deserving the gallows — men who make an infamous traffic of religion. Mexico has her share of these wretches. Whose fault is it? In the past it has been Spanish manners — climate. In the present it is the episcopate. If the bishops had good seminaries, where pupils could receive a sound and serious education; if the bishops had more energy; if they were more cautious in the choice of candidates for the priesthood; if they required others to observe, and observed themselves, more scrupulously, the canon ical laws of the Church, they would not see the disorder of which they are now the first to complain. ... I have known, in the south and in the north of the Mexican Empire, pastors who gave balls at their houses and never thought the least in the world that it would be better to dis tribute bread to the poor than to give champagne and refreshments to the danseuses. The clergy carry their love of the family to that of paternity. In my travels in the interior of Mexico many pastors have refused me hospi tality in order to prevent my seeing their nieces and cousins, and their children. It is difficult to determine the character of these connections. Priests who are recognized as fathers of families are by no means rare. The people consider it natural enough, and do not rail at the conduct of their pastors, excepting when they are not contented with one wife. ... I remember that one of these prelates, passing through a village near the episcopal city, the priest said to him, " Sire, have the goodness to bless my children and their mother." The good bishop blessed them. There was a chamberful. Another did better still. He baptized the child of one of his priests. Can a clergy of such character make saints ? I doubt. Nevertheless, they must not be taken for heretics. . . . They make merchandise of the sacraments, and make money by every religious ceremony, without thinking that they are guilty of simony, and expose themselves to the censures of the Church. If Roman justice had its course in Mexico one half of the Mexican clergy would be. excommuni cated. . . . The well-instructed priests, disinterested and animated by a truly apostolical spirit, holy souls whose religious sentiments are of good character, constitute an insignificant minority. . . . But is it not a lie to God and men to make a vow of poverty and then live in the midst of abundance and comfort, as the ecclesiastics of all Spanish America do? One of the greatest evils in Mexico is the exorbitant fee for the mar riage ceremony. The priests compel the poor to live without marriage, by demanding for the nuptial benediction a, sum that a Mexican mechanic, with his slender wages, can scarcely accumulate in fifty years of the 4 34 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. strictest economy. This is no exaggeration. The consequences of the excessive demands for perquisites in general are as lamentable to public morality as to religion. One of the first duties of the Mexican episcopate should be, in my opinion, to reduce the fee for baptisms, marriages, dis pensations, and every thing else indispensable to the performance of relig ious duties.* Another brief testimony from Madame Calderon which is especially pointed. The evil existing in monastic institutions was concealed as far as possible from her ; yet, doubtless with a sad heart, she made this entry : Some of these convents are not entirely free from scandal. Among the monks there are many who are openly a disgrace to their calling, though I firmly believe that by far the greater number lead a life of privation and virtue. Once more, as it intrudes itself on her view even in the public streets, she is reminded of the attempts of the Viceroy Revil lagigedo, as long ago as his time, to restrain the profligacy of these monks by stern expulsion. She adds : Alas! could his excellency have lived in these degenerate days and beheld certain monks of a certain order drinking pulque and otherwise dis porting themselves, nay, seen one, as we but just now did from the win dow, strolling along the street by lamp-light, with an Tndita (Indian girl) tucked under his arm ! (Pp. 153, 238.) In one of the quotations from the abbe we read, " The Mex ican is not a Catholic ; he is simply a Christian because he has been baptized." This distinction is amusing to a Protestant. How a " semi-idolater," " ignorant of spiritual worship," can be a Christian in any sense acceptable to God is something evan gelicals cannot realize, and it shows how sacred terms are per verted by the false theology of Romanism. He would explain his remark by the doctrine of baptismal regeneration. The poor Indian having been baptized by one in the " apostolic succession" was therein regenerated, notwithstanding all his " insane superstition " and " hideous vice." Poor Mexico ! Romanism has not saved her ; she needs the true Gospel * Mexico and the United States, pp. 195, etc. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 35 of the Lord Jesus, offering her the mercy that she requires,, freely. The perversion has been so great and the abolition of biblical ideas of truth and purity so complete in the ruin wrought by this fallen Church upon the nation that the evangelization of Mexico has thus been made the most difficult work to which the Church of Christ can now address herself. If it were not for the promised power of the Holy Spirit, to whose blessed agency all things are possible, the condition would seem almost hope less. But with this co-operation it is our privilege to believe and expect that the mercy and consolation reserved for this deeply injured people will all the more transcend the weight of sorrow through which they have passed, so that " where sin abounded grace shall much more abound." Rome began her rule in Mexico by sweeping away by red- handed violence the intellectual stamina of the nation as well as its records and literature. On this point Baron Humboldt's testimony is conclusive. His great learning and thorough inquiry in examinations conducted on the ground itself enable him to speak with full authority. Of the original wrong and destruction of the middle class, which wrecked the nation, he writes : The Christian fanaticism broke out in a particular manner against the Aztec priests and the teopiqui, or ministers of the divinity, and all those who inhabited the teocallis, or houses of God, who might be considered as the depositaries of the historical, mythological, and astronomical knowl edge of the country, were exterminated ; for the priests observed the me ridian shade in the gnomons and regulated the calendar. The monks burned the hieroglyphical paintings by which every kind of knowledge had been transmitted from generation to generation. The people, deprived of these means of instruction, were plunged in an ignorance so much the deeper, as the missionaries were unskilled in the Mexican languages and could substitute few new ideas in place of the old. The better sort of Indians, among whom a certain degree of culture and intellect might be supposed, perished in great part at. the commencement of the Spanish conquest, the victims of European ferocity. The natives who remained consisted only of the most indigent race — poor cultivators, artisans, weavers — porters who were used as beasts of burden. How shall we 36 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. judge, then, from these miserable remains of a powerful people, of the de gree of cultivation to which it had risen from the twelfth to the sixteenth century, and of the intellectual development of which it is susceptible ? If all that remained of the French or German nation were a few poor agriculturists, could we read in their features that they belonged to nations which had produced a Descartes and a Clairaut, a Kepler and a Leib nitz ? * In General Lew Wallace's valuable work entitled Quetzel, or The Fair God, the author has united together the incidental evidence which history and legend still hold of Montezuma's empire and people as they were before the Spaniards invaded their country and savagely destroyed their prosperity. It was a worthy service to render to Mexico, and may well rank in this sense next to that which he embodied in Ben Hur, when pre senting to the world the civilization which characterized the period of the Incarnation and the nature of the foreign rule which had displaced the native dynasty of the Jewish people. Even Nero's despotic government left uninjured the conquered race in the very particulars in which the Roman Church and Spanish government crushed life and freedom and hope out of the Aztec people. This conviction was ingrained into the minds of many of the intelligent native gentlemen of Mexico. One such said to the writer in 1875 : My countrymen are to-day in a far worse condition than they were when Cortez burned his ships behind him in the harbor of Vera Cruz and marched to the conquest of Montezuma's empire — worse fed, worse clad, worse housed, and more ignorant than they were that day. Few that know Mexico would call this terrible accusation in question ; while the quotations which we have made from the work of the Abbe Domenech (whose veracity no Romanist will call in question) show that it is the Church and not the State that must be held responsible for the guilt involved in the above charge. Take the single fact of the burning shame so long festering in the social life of Mexico, which is one of the charges that the abbe brings against his Church, the absence of * Essai Politique, vol. i, p. 117. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 37 marriage and the consequent general prevalence of illegitimacy over the land. Nor was it from the poor uninstructed millions of the Otomi or Aztec race alone that she took away the " key of knowledge," as we learned when fitting up a church in the city of Mexico. The Ten Commandments were placed on either side of the pulpit. Intelligent Mexican gentlemen were constantly coming in to see the changes going forward in the building, and they would stand in front of the second commandment and read every word of it, read it again, as those who had never seen it before, and sometimes would turn to us and ask if that " was really in the Bible?" Then, mark the universal practice of image worship, the doc- trine^>f purgatory, with its corresponding tenet of indulgences ; without the Bible or the school, terrorized by the Inquisition, and threatened with the " major excommunication," or the per petual pains of hell, if they desired a change or claimed freedom to worship God. It seems incredible that a Church could thus crowd a nation into destitution and ignorance, but the testimony cannot be questioned. Beyond the impoverishment caused by her extravagant church demands, there was another means more potent still to draw from the people their resources, by masses and indulgences for the souls of the dead. General Waddy Thompson, United States embassador in Mexico, ex presses his amazement at what he saw in 1845. He writes : The immense wealth which is collected in the churches is not by any means all, or even the larger portion, of the wealth of the Mexican Church and clergy. They own very many of the finest houses in Mexico and other cities' (the rents of which must be enormous), besides valuable real estates all over the republic. Almost every person leaves a bequest in his will for masses for his soul, which constitute an encumbrance upon the estate, and thus nearly all the estates of the small proprietors are mortgaged to the Church. As a means of raising money I would not give the single institution of the Catholic religion of masses and indulgences for the benefit of the souls of the dead for the power of taxation possessed by any government. Of all the artifices of cunning and venality to extort money from credulous 38 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. weakness there is none so potential as a mass for the benefit of the souls in purgatory. Our own more rational faith teaches that when a man dies his account is closed and his destiny for good or evil is fixed forever, and that he is to be judged by " the deeds done in the body; " but another creed inculcates that that destiny may be modified or changed by prayers at once posthumous, vicarious, and venal. It would seem to be in direct contradiction to the Saviour in the comparison of the camel passing through the eye of a needle. Nothing is easier than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven; he purchases that entrance with money. I do not know how the fee for these masses is exacted, but I do know that it is regularly paid, and that, without the fee, the mass would be regarded of no value or efficacy. I remember that my washerwoman once asked me to lend her two dollars. I asked her what she wanted with it. She told me that there was a particular mass to be said on that day which relieved the souls in purgatory from ten thousand years of torment, and that she wished to secure the benefit of it for her mother. I asked her if .^e was fool enough to believe it. She answered, "Why, yes, sir; is it not true? " and with a countenance of as much surprise as if I had denied that the sun was shining. I have seen stuck up on the door of the Church of San Francisco, one of the largest and most magnificent in Mexico, an adver tisement, of which the following was the substance : "His holiness the pope (and certain bishops which were named) have granted thirty-two thousand three hundred years, ten days, and six hours of indulgence for this mass." The manifest object of this particularity is to secure the more effect ual belief in the imposture. By thus giving to it the air of a business transaction, a sort of contract between the devotee and the Almighty, by his authorized agent and vicegerent on earth, the pope, is estab lished. I tremble at the apparent blasphemy of even describing these things.* Such indulgences are constantly seen, as advertisements on the church doors in Mexico, without any attempt at conceal ment. These facts justify Father Gavazzi's assertion that " the dogma of purgatory became the true California of the priests, the best gold-mine of the papal system." The pictures of purgatory, provided to make the requisite impressions on those who have lost friends, are frightful. One of, them, purchased in Mexico, lies before ns. It represents a lady shut up in this miniature hell, surrounded by thick walls * Recollections of Mexico, p. 43 . MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 39 and the window barred with heavy irons. On her wrists is fast ened a yard of heavy chain, while the lurid flames rise round her to the height of her shoulders. In agony she lifts up her manacled hands as in imploring supplication to her living friends to furnish the aid that shall end her misery and deliver her from the place of torment. No wonder that such pictures, among ignorant people, do the work they were intended to ac complish. Well did that vile peddler of such indulgences, sent out with full powers by Pope Leo X., in 1507, to dispose of them, know how to raise the requisite terror in the imagi nation of the crowds that stood around him in Germany, then so ignorant and superstitious. But Roman greed outdid itself when God's agent, Martin Luther, entered the crowd and heard the audacious Tetzel finish his harangue with the words, " The very moment the money clicks on the bottom of this chest the sonl escapes from purgatory and flies to heaven ! Bring your money, bring money, bring money ! " Luther was horrified with the profanation, and within a few days nailed up the ninety- five immortal theses on the doors of the Cathedral of Wiirtem- berg, and the great Reformation was born. Our characteristic designation sprang from the protest of this honest monk. We are, and will remain, Pro-test-ants in the name of Almighty God, against all doctrines that cannot be deduced from his Holy Bible. But, alas for the Mexican people ! Denied the word of God, they have no way of ascertaining that the doctrine is of man's invention, a perversion of the Gospel, "and a dishonor to the Redeemer's office. He is represented as interceding for the salvation of all who " come unto God by him." But if mul titudes of them are in purgatory, as Romanism teaches, they are practically beyond his help. He can do nothing for them, as the pope alone holds the key. There they may remain for ages, unless they have left money for masses, or their friends supply the lack. " The power of the keys " — a phrase which they boastingly use — is only exerted where money furnishes the motive, so that it has been bitterly said of these conditions, 40 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. " Where there is high money there is high muss, low mone}', low mass, and no money, no mass." One trembles on reflecting what will be the ultimate venge ance of God upon a system that so daringly misrepresents his mercy and the sole efficacy of the sacrifice of his Son. Now being the " accepted time, and this the day of salvation," by " the precious blood of Christ, which cleanseth from all sin," this leaves nothing for purgatory or priest to cleanse after death, and its special honor is that it is offered to all, " with out money and without price." A glorious Gospel for even the poorest sinner on earth. Many of the educated men of Mexico, disgusted with the manifestations of this money-getting system of Romanism, are infidels or free-thinkers, like the same class of men in France and Italy, while many of them who are not infidels cannot rec oncile this doctrine of their Church with common sense or with the justice of God. Madame Calderon refers to a con versation with one such after attending a ".high mass " for the release of a mutual friend : C n received an invitation some time ago to attend the honras of the daughter of the Marquis of S a. M. was observing to-day that if this Catholic doctrine was firmly believed, and that the prayers of the Church are indeed availing to shorten the sufferings of those who have gone before us, to relieve those whom we love from thousands of years of torture, it is astonishing how the rich do not become poor and the poor beggars in furtherance of this object; and that if the idea be purely human it showed a wonderful knowledge of human nature on the part of the inventor, as what source of profit could be more sure? (P. 81.) Madame Calderon evidently sympathized with the idea pre sented. How can men really believe as the priests of Rome profess to do and act so heartlessly ? Here is the pope, who upholds so strongly the belief in purgatory and in his own power of release from it, and yet only money can move him to open those dreadful doors and let out the sufferers. If this man truly believed in his doctrine and his power to meet the dreadful emergency of multitudes — of millions — shut up, as MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 41 they declare, in fires " only a little less hot than hell itself," how could he rest day or night ? Should we not expect that his zeal would consume him in his efforts to issue indulgences and offer these releasing masses from early morning to late at night, not waiting for any other motive but the promptings of compassion alone, to free them daily by the thousands from their tortures? And would not the Mexican clergy, if they sincerely maintained this doctrine, instead of waiting for the low motive of money to arouse them, rush to the rescue and be on their altars from dawn to dark to relieve such sufferers, and especially the poor who have nothing with which to pay for their release .? 42 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. CHAPTER II. " Gross darkness " — Mariolatry of Mexico unique — Hostility of the two Virgins — Their respective legends — Their fabulous wealth — General Thompson and Mrs. Gooch's testimony to this wild idolatry — The " cursed fools " of Guada lupe — Opposite parts taken by these Virgins in the conflict for popular rights — Impossible titles and relations — The terrible climax at Puebla — Mexico's degradation fully accounted for here — Dates of dogmas. We should not do our subject justice if we failed to present to our readers one of their religious peculiarities, and perhaps the most awful of them all — for the extent to which it has de based the nation. It is equally nnscriptural and irrational with those already named, and amazes strangers who visit the land. Even Romanists, who come not merely from Protestant coun tries, where religious competition has saved them from descend ing to the sad depths in which they find their Church in Mex ico, but natives of Spain and Italy as well, are pained to be hold what they witness here. Madame Calderon will be again our impartial guide. Here, too, we shall be conscious of that occasional quiet humor which she could not quite repress as the amazing stories were told her by bishops and others. Though a devoted Romanist, there was a revulsion in her intelligent mind as she witnessed these absurd and wicked idolatries of her Church in Mexico. Their splendor and costly decorations could not blind her as to their true character. We are referring to the practices of the Mariolatry, which has no parallel in any other land, and which has raised up two Virgins for the adoration of the Mexican people ! Madame Calderon tells the story of the first of these Virgins as follows : We went lately to pay a visit to the celebrated " Virgin de los Reme dios," the Spanish patroness and rival of "Our Lady of Guadalupe." MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 43 This Virgin was brought over from Spain by the army of Cort6z, and on the night of the Noche Triste the image disappeared, and nothing further was known of it, until, on the top of a barren mountain in the heart of a large maguey, it was found. Her restoration was joyfully hailed by the Spaniards. A church was erected on the spot. A priest was appointed to take charge of the miraculous image. Her fame spread abroad. Gifts of immense value were brought to her shrine. A treasurer was ap pointed to take care of her jewels, a camarista (a keeper of robes) to superintend her rich wardrobe. No wealthy dowager died in peace until she had bequeathed to Our Lady of Remedies her largest diamond or her richest pearl. In seasons of drought she is brought in from her dwelling in the mountain and carried in procession through the streets. The viceroy himself on foot used to lead the holy train. One of the highest rank drives the chariot in which she is seated. In succession she visits the principal convents, and as she is carried through the cloistered pre cincts the nuns are ranged on their knees in humble adoration. Plenti ful rains immediately follow her arrival or pestilences are terminated. ... It is true that there came a time when the famous curate Hidalgo, the prime mover in the revolution, having taken as his standard an image of the Virgin of Guadalupe, an increased rivalry arose between her and the Spanish Virgin ; and Hidalgo being defeated and forced to fly, the image of the Virgin de los Remedios was conducted to Mexico dressed as a general and invoked as the patroness of Spain. . . . The church where she is enshrined is handsome, and above the altar is a copy of the original Virgin. After we had remained there a little while we were admitted into the sanctum, where the identical Virgin of Cortez, with a large silver maguey, occupies her splendid shrine. The priest retired and put on his robes, and then returning, and all kneeling before the altar, he recited the Credo. This over, he mounted the steps, and, opening the shrine where the Virgin was incased, knelt down and removed her in his arms. He then presented her to each one of us in succession, every one kissing the hem of her satin robe. She was after ward replaced with the same ceremony. The image is a wooden doll about a foot high, holding in its arms an infant Jesus, both faces evidently carved with a rude penknife, two holes for the eyes and another for the mouth. The doll was dressed in blue satin and pearls, with a crown upon her head, and a quantity of hair fast ened onto the crown. No Indian idol could be much uglier. As she has been a good deal scratched and destroyed in the lapse of ages, C n ob served that he was astonished that they had not tried to restore her a little. To this the padre replied that the attempt had been made by several artists, each one of whom had sickened and died. He also mentioned as one of 44 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. her miracles that living on a solitary mountain she had never been robbed ; but I fear the good padre is somewhat oblivious, as this sacrilege has hap pened more than once. On one occasion, a crowd of leperos (beggars) being collected, and the image carried round to be kissed, one of them, affecting intense devotion, bit off the large pearl that adorned her dress in front, and before the theft was discovered he had mingled with the crowd and escaped. When reminded of the circumstance the padre said it was true, but that the thief was a Frenchman ! (P. 120.) This ill-conditioned image has been for more than three centuries the special idol of the Spanish aristocracy in Mexico. She was served with great splendor, and was the owner of the famous petticoats valued at $3,000,000. Waddy Thompson describes one of her processions which he witnessed, " number ing some forty to fifty thousand persons, including all the high dignitaries of the government, the Church, and the army," all professing to believe the priestly story that every attempt to repair the broken nose or to supply the lost eye " ended in the death of the daring sinner who would attempt to improve an image made in heaven." The Empress Carlota, on her arrival in Mexico in 1864, accepted this Virgin as her protectress, and resolved to serve her with an earnestness that would popularize her with the nation. Those who were present and saw her do it described to the writer how zealously she headed the proces sion of Mexican ladies, she, as each of them, carrying an immense burning wax taper as they walked through the dusty streets of the capital in honor of this image. The poor lady evidently knew not all the facts involved in her action, or how much too late it was to restore the popularity that had been waning ever since the republican movements, which began in 1810, bringing to the front another idol — another Virgin Mary — instead of this one, formerly the popular image of Mexico. We should say that the picture of this Virgin which we here present and which is the accepted type, brought from Mexico, rather flatters the original ! The artist evidently did not fol low copy in this case and give the world a faithful representation of the image which is so truly described as " rude and ugly." Of course one is expected to make allowance for a lady who not THE VIRGIN OF REMEDIOS, The patroness of the Spaniards in Mexico. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 45 only went through the vicissitudes and hard experiences of " the Conquest," but who in addition has added three hundred and fifty to her years of earthly life and shows now the effect of both ! In January, 1874, 1 paid a visit to this shrine to see and hear for myself what there was remaining of this once famous image. The church and its surroundings was a picture of desolation. The only power that could have restored its prestige and glory bad been overthrown when the cause of Maximilian and Carlota had been crushed. She shared their fate. The church, once so resplendent, was shut up, but three or four poor people, who were hanging round in expectation of an occasional visitor, on seeing us approach started off to call the priest of the church. He soon appeared, the doors were opened, and after robing him self he took down the image from her shrine with the usual large amount of formality and many genuflections, and pre sented her to our view, and then lowered her near enough for us to kiss the hem of her garment, if so disposed, and seemed rather disappointed when we declined the honor. Our lack of service and reverence, however, was made up by the three or four beggars who had come in when we entered. They adoringly kissed the " sacred " margin of her petticoat and crossed them selves. As we stood at that altar and contemplated this image . our hearts went out in deep compassion to the misguided millions of Mexico who have been taught to trust in and worship such a rival of Almighty God as this is, and at the same time became conscious of a deeper feeling than we have ever felt before of the guilt of a clergy who could thus mislead their fellow-beings. This idolatry explained the poverty, ignorance, and degradation of the people. I asked the priest why the Virgin no longer went in grand processions to Mexico, as of old, and he sadly re plied, " Ah, Senor, the Virgin of Remedios goes no more in pro cessions until the ' Laws of Reform ' are repealed ! " All right. Then she will probably stay where she is, more and more de serted, for the liberty-loving Mexicans are not likely to go back on their grand record of freedom. While the Mexicans are 46 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. greatly to be pitied, we have no reason to suppose that we should have been in a better state had we for three hundred years been bearing the burdens they have carried. Give the United States to the absolute control of the same Church and the same kind of clergy, let them inculcate the same doctrines and practices, place the same restrictions on freedom of thought and the Bible, grant them an established Church and the parochial school sys tem, with political corruption in national affairs, and what rea son have we to suppose that in half the time they have thus wielded power in the land of the Aztecs, say one hundred and fifty years, we would not show an equal ruin and degrada tion? Still, we have not completed our showing of the unique situ ation in Mexico. The second image of the Virgin, which has figured as a bitter rival of this one, shall have her story pre sented to us by Madame Calderon, who had the narration from the lips of the resident bishop, on the occasion of her visit to the grand shrine of the Virgin of Guadalupe, with all the surroundings of the gorgeous cathedral to impress her favor ably. The "divine painting" of the Virgin of Guadalupe repre sents her in a blue cloak covered with stars, a garment of crimson and gold, her hands clasped, and her foot on a crescent, supported by a cherub. The original painting is coarse, and only remarkable for the tradition attached to it. Madame Calderon's narrative is as follows : We went to call on the bishop, the Ylustrisimo Senor Campos, whom we found in his canonicals, and who seems a good little old man, but no conjurer. . . . Folding his hands and looking down, he proceeded to recount the history of the miraculous apparition, pretty much as fol lows: "In 1531, ten years and four months after the conquest of Mexico, a fort unate Indian, whose name was Juan Diego, passing by the mountain of Tepeyac, a short distance south of Mexico city, the holy Virgin suddenly appeared before him and ordered him to go in her name to the bishop, the Ylustrisimo D. Fr. Juan de Zumarraga, and to make known to him that she desired to have a place of worship erected in her honor on that MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 47 spot. The next day the Indian passed by the same place, when again the holy Virgin appeared before him and demanded the result of his commis sion. Juan Diego replied that in spite of his endeavor he had not been able to obtain an audience of the bishop. 'Return,' said the Virgin, 'and say that it is I, the Virgin Mary, mother of God, who sends thee.' Juan Diego obeyed the divine orders, yet still the bishop would not.give him credence, merely desiring him to bring some sign or token of the Virgin's will. He returned with this message on the 12th of December, when, for the third time, he beheld the apparition of the Virgin. She now commanded him to climb to the top of the oarren rock of Tepeyac, to gather the roses which he should find there, and to bring them to her. The humble messenger obeyed, though well knowing that on that spot were neither flowers nor any trace of vegetation. Nevertheless, he found the roses, which he gathered and brought to the Virgin Mary, who, throw ing them into his tilma [blanket], said, ' Return, show these to the bishop, and tell him that these are the credentials of thy mission.' Juan Diego set out for the episcopal residence, and when he found himself in the presence of the prelate he unfolded his tilma to show him the roses, when there appeared imprinted on it the miraculous image which has existed for more than three centuries. "When the bishop beheld it he was seized with astonishment and awe, and conveyed it in a solemn procession to his own oratory, and shortly after this splendid church was erected in honor of the patroness of New Spain. From all parts of the country," continued the old bishop, " people flocked in crowds to see our Lady of Guadalupe, and esteem it an honor to obtain sight of her. What must 1 >e my happiness, who can see her most gracious majesty every hour and every minute of the day? I would not quit Guadalupe for any other part of the world, nor for any temptation that could be held out to me ; " and the pious man remained for a few moments as if rapt in ecstasy.* The old bishop's account is borrowed, but in very much abridged form, from a printed sermon of Cardinal de Lorenzana, Archbishop of Mexico in 1760 ; and that sermon and descrip tion, be it observed, is the general source from whence all writers take in presenting this legend, though its value as to veracity is brought much into question by the fact that the cardinal did not give the story to the world until two hundred and twenty- seven years after the events were said to have occurred ! Those who desire the fuller account of the legend will find it in * Life in Mexico, p. 60. 48 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. Brantz Mayer's valuable work.* His account is taken from that printed by Ignatio Barillo y Perez. All persons visiting this now famous cathedral corroborate the account of the wealth and splendor which have been lav ished on this shrine until the facts seem bewildering, and the extravagant ceremonial of her anniversary every December may well be reckoned among the amazing facts of this world, espe cially considering the ponderous edifice that the clericals have ventured to build upon such a slender foundation as this story of the poor Indian peon and his blanket. Robertson describes the splendor of the scene which he witnessed on the anniversary. He says : The interior decorations of the church are sumptuous in the extreme. The altar at the north end, and the canopy and the pillars around it, are of the finest marbles. Above it, in a frame of solid gold, covered with a crystal plate, is the figure of the Virgin, painted on the Indian's tilma, presented in the picture on the opposite page here. On each side of the image, within the frame, and extending its whole length, are strips of gold literally crusted with emeralds, diamonds, and pearls. At the feet of the figure there are again large clusters of the same costly gems. From each side of the frame issues a circle of golden rays, while above it, as if floating in the air, hangs the figure of a dove of solid silver as large as a goose in size.t We here present this second Virgin of Mexico to our readers. This picture, gorgeously illuminated, of her whom they de light to call " The Patron Saint and Protectress of Mexico " is found in nearly all the homes in the land, in every variety, from cheap engravings to costly paintings. With her devotees the greatest day in the whole year is the 12th of December, the anniversary of her miraculous appearance, when the crowds come from all parts to witness the rites instituted in her honor. Until recently the whole pompous ceremonial was countenanced by the presence and apparent devotion of all the high officers of the government, including the president himself. In evi- * Mexico : Aztec, Spanish, and Republican, in two volumes, Drake & Co., Hartford, vol. i, p. 256, etc. f A Visit to Mexico, by W. P. Robertson, vol. ii. London, 1853". CMSBSAX Y ce NONFECIT TAUTER OMiNI NATI THE VIRGIN OF GUADALUPE, The patroness of the native Mexicans. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 49 dence of this amazing folly notice the testimony of General Thompson. After describing the scene and its prodigality of wealth in honor of this idol of Mexico, he says : If the reader should ask, "Does any body believe this?" I answer, that on the anniversary of this miracle I went to the Church of Guada lupe, where more than fifty thousand people were assembled, among them President Bravo and all his cabinet, the archbishop, and, in short, every body in high station in Mexico. An oration in commemoration of the event was delivered by a distinguished member of the Mexican Con gress. He described all the circumstances of the affair as I have given them, but with all the extravagance of Mexican rhetoric, just as one of our Fourth of July orators would narrate the events of the Revolution. The president and others exchanged all the while smiles and glances of pride and exultation.* Eleven years later R. A. Wilson, of Rochester, visited Mex ico and made a thorough examination of their ceremonies in this Gaudalupe cathedral. Two of his Sabbaths were given to the matter. He says : The State and the Church were duly represented upon the platform by -the president [then Santa Anna], the nuncio, and the archbishop.- Beneath the platform, and within the silver railing, were the official representatives of foreign nations, who were easily distinguished by a strip of gold or silver lace upon the collars and lapels of their coats. To this uniformity of dress there was a single exception in the person of the new American embassador, Mr. Gadsden, whose plain black dress and clerical appearance would have conveyed the impression that he was a Methodist preacher, had he not been engaged, with all the awkwardness of a novice, upon his knees in crossing himself. . . . On the next Sabbath I attended the Indian celebration of the appearance of "the most blessed Virgin." Dur ing the Christmas holidays in the country of the Pintos I had seen Indians dressed up in whimsical attire, enacting plays, and singing and dancing ; but this was the first time that I had ever seen, in a house dedicated to the worship of God, or, rather, in a temple consecrated to the adoration of the Virgin, fantastic dances performed by Indians under the supervision of priests and bishops. When I found out what the entertainment was I was heartily vexed that I should be at such a place on the Sabbath day. The dancing and singing were bad enough, but the climax was reached when the priest came down from the altar, with an array of attendants * Recollections of Mexico, p. 112. S 50 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. having immense candles, to the side-door, where the procession stopped to witness the discharge at midday of a large amount of fire-works in honor of the Virgin Mary. I hurried home from this profanation of the Lord's day, and sat down and comtemplated the old Aztec god, who had been deified for his wisdom, and could not but regret the change that had been imposed upon these Indians. The next Sabbath after this was the national anni versary of the miraculous apparition; but having seen enough of this sort of thing I concluded that my Sabbath would be better spent in staying at home and reading a Spanish Testament, which had been brought into the country in violation of the law. When I was first at the city of Mexico, Governor Letcher related to me the stratagem by which he con trived to smuggle an American Bible agent out of the country when the police were after him, on an accusation of selling prohibited books ; for in such a country as this the word of God is a prohibited book.* One is surprised that so competent an observer as Madame Calderon is so deficient in her account of the services at Guada lupe. It could not be for lack of opportunity, for she remained in Mexico for more than two years, and must have seen it all, especially at the time of the great festivals. Her silence, to us, can be accounted for in two ways — either the fact of her Spanish interests leading her to sympathize rather with the Virgin of Remedies, or else she had witnessed the scenes at Guadalupe and had been so grieved that she was unwilling to describe them. A recent witness, Mrs. F. C. Gooch, describes the occurrences in 1887. A change for the better has certainly come at Gua dalupe, especially in the entire withdrawal of government pat ronage ; yet these observations evidence that enough remains of these manifestations of folly and profanity in the name of religion to grieve the heart of every intelligent Romanist who visits Mexico. She writes : A party of Americans, of which I was one, with a few Mexicans, went to Guadalupe the night before the grand fiesta was to take place. To adequately describe the scene would require the pen of a Dickens. The poor, the lame, the halt, and the blind had been there congregated as well as the hale and the hearty. The babel of voices, the songs of the Indians, * Mexico and its Religion, p. 230, by R. A. Wilson. Harper & Co., 1856. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 51 the fire-crackers and sky-rockets, suggested to us, instead of a religious congregation, rather a demoniacal pandemonium. Gambling was in full force. . . . The air was filled with an indiscriminate jangle of un earthly sounds, from a variety of very earthly instruments, which, with the dust, the odor of the meat cooking, and the fumes from the crowd, made us hurry along to the chapel on the hill, where a treat was in store for us. The Indians from the fastnesses of the Sierras, in the far north, were to dance in their peculiar costumes. Animated by insatiable curiosity, and anxious to witness the entire cer emonials, I pressed through the crowd of poor people to the inner circle. What a scene ! The wildest, most fantastically decked beings that mor tal eye ever beheld were in the inner space. . . . Then the dance ! They formed circles, the men on the outer circle and the women on the first inner circle, and again other circles of the younger Indians of both sexes, forming one within the other. The everlasting jangle and trum- trum of the ghastly jarana covered with the skin of an armadillo, looking like an exhumed skeleton, with the finery of flaunting ribbons floating around it, its harsh notes mingling with the drowning wail of the wild musician who played as though in a frenzy, were in keeping with the whole scene. ... It was the wildest, most mournful dance that mortal could invent ; and it seemed as if the souls of the devotees were in the movement. It was a sort of paroxysm of physical devotion, and seemed to exhaust its votaries. Having concluded the dance to the honor and glory of Guadalupe, they filed into the church chanting a low, monotonous hymn. I was the first to enter after them, followed closely by my friends. When they reached the altar, where a large picture of the Virgin was suspended, all dropped on their knees in regular lines of fours, and began crossing themselves and murmuring their paternosters. The man who played on the jarana recited prayers, the others respond ing. After this they sang a litany, accompanied by low, moaning sounds, as if in anguish of spirit, while every eye was fixed steadily upon the pa tron saint in mute appeal, and tears streamed down their bronzed and hardened faces. After half an hour thus spent upon their knees they arose, and still accompanied by the strange music from the ghastly instrument, that seemed to have taken on a more unearthly character, moved backward, making a low courtesy at each step, and as they filed out sang in chorus in their strange tongue : " From heaven she descended, Triumphant and glorious, To favor us — La Guadalupana. 52 Mexico in transition. "Farewell, Guadalupe ! Queen of the Indians ! Our life is thine, This kingdom is thine." When they withdrew from the church, our party following closely, the dancing was renewed with added fervor. But before we had gone down ten of the almost countless steps, one of the most picturesquely attired of all the Indians was walking by my side, making a bargain with me for the sale of his crown and feathers ! While the scene I had just witnessed had at times an effect to excite merriment the contrary feeling of sadness and almost reverence prevailed. I could not but feel awe in the presence of those dark children of the wild mountains as they performed their mystical devotions and sang the rude barbaric songs that had in their tones the strangeness of another world.* All this heathenism in the house of God ! More Aztec by far than Christian ; for, save the person supposed to be repre sented on the " blanket " within the golden frame, there is not one Christian idea about the whole service. Yet these occasions are regarded as the most meritorious of the year in Mexico. The scene, taken altogether, is matchless on the earth. A vast multitude of people, all bent on these wild, idolatrous practices ; the sales of the sacred medals, ribbons, scapulars, and other de vices ; the crowd around the sacred well struggling for a share of the " holy " water, to carry to their distant homes, while the women and boys push vigorously the sale of the tickets for the lottery. One asks, " Is it possible that this scene is authorized by the Roman Catholic Church ? " It is, all authorized. Look into the center of that crowd at the church door and see. A busy man stands behind a table selling bright medals, which are oblong in shape, and about an inch and a half long. On one side is the image of the Virgin of Guadalupe, with the inscription, " N. S. D. Guadalupe de Mexico ; " on the obverse, " Non fecit taliter omni nationi." Each is delivered to the purchaser wrapped in a little piece of printed paper, on which you read : Our most holy father, the sovereign Pope Pius VI., by his brief of the 13th of April, 1785, has conceded plenary indulgence in the hour of death * Face to Face with the Mexicans, by F. C. Gooch, p. 251. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 53 to all those who shall then have upon them one of the medals of Our Lady of Guadalupe, which, ready blest, are sold in her sanctuary.* So the highest authority in the Church of Rome has indorsed all this perversion of Christianity, and even professes to carry its supposed benefits through death into eternity ! The poor, misguided people accept the assurance of their pontiff and vent ure their soul's welfare upon the possession of the medal ! They also furnish a document to show that this " miraculous appearance of the mother of God upon earth," the year and at the place aforesaid, was proved before the Congregation of Rites at Rome. And Benedict XIV. was so fully persuaded of the truth of the tradition that he made cordial devotion to our Lady of Guadalupe, conceded the proper mass and ritual of devotion. He also made mention of it in the lesson of the second nocturnal, . . . declaring from the high throne of the Vatican that Mary, most holy, non fecit taliter omni nationi. All this resting upon the slender foundation of the story of an Indian peon, " though, like many of his race, he was prob ably an habitual liar, yet when he bears testimony to a miracle he is presumed to speak the truth.f " Those who have examined the "miraculous" picture closely are very doubtful of the " blanket " part of it. Mr. W. E. Curtis, in 1888, while on a mission from our government, carefully examined the matter, and gives his conclusion : According to the story, the portrait is stamped upon the serape or blan ket of the shepherd, and this Catholics in Mexico devoutly believe. But a close examination reveals the fact that it is done in ordinary oil colors upon a piece of ordinary canvas, and that the pigments peel off like those of any poorly executed piece of work. J This testimony is confirmed by Colonel Evans in Our Sister Republic, p. 349. General Thompson was one day looking at this picture in company with a Mexican friend, and directing his attention to * See A Visit to Mexico, Robertson, vol. ii, p. 154. f Wilson's Mexico, pp. 231, 232. | The Capitals of Spanish America, p. 21. 54 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. the Latin sentence, Non fecit taliter omni nationi, which is no doubt quoted from the Vulgate of Psalm cxlvii, 20, where the psalmist is exulting in the distinguishing favors which the Lord Jehovah had conferred upon Israel, saying, " He hath not dealt so with any nation." Unaware that he was putting a question to his friend which intelligent Mexicans are reluctant to answer to a foreigner, he asked the meaning of the words, whereupon his friend promptly replied that it meant, " She had never made such cursed fools of any other people ! " The gentleman's exposition may pass unchallenged, though its utterance a few years earlier might have sent him to the Inquisition ; for there is no worse degradation than is here ex hibited, which this dreadful departure from primitive Chris tianity has entailed upon this people for generations. So far as we can trace back the origin of this legend we re member that the conquistadores found it impossible to complete the catholicizing of Mexico by force and cruelty. They found it equally difficult to attract the conquered natives to the wor ship of the Spanish Virgin Mary, whose image and pictures they sought to induce the Aztecs to accept and set up in their homes for worship. The conquered people could not forget that the figure of this Spanish Virgin was borne on the stand ards of their victorious oppressors, and aided, as they supposed, in their enslavement. This foreign goddess they thereforo rejected, unless when compelled to worship her. Tlieir own temples and idols had all been destroyed, and they longed for something to trust in and adore. So, a new policy to meet the case had to be thought out, and erelong the idea was conceived of a native Virgin Mary — not Spanish but Mexican — manifest ing herself as such to the Aztec race as their own Virgin and pa troness. It was not hard to find a suitable tool with which to try the experiment, and Juan Diego, being well backed up, worked out the problem successfully. It did not seem to give the con spirators who invented this new Virgin Mary much considera tion that the two ladies must necessarily be rivals and the whole affair become ridiculous in its results. It was enough for them MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 55 that the Spaniards could worship one Virgin Mary and the Aztecs worship the other, each with the services and rites which they preferred, and all would go conveniently. Wealth remained with the Spanish Virgin for a long time, but the one of Guadalupe had the crowds, and their devotion led them to emulate the liberality of the other party and in time to exceed it, though in doing so they made their own impover ishment perpetual, so that every stranger visiting the land is amazed at the incongruity of the poverty of the worshipers and the wealth and splendor of the services. When the great struggle for deliverance from the Spanish yoke culminated in the effort for independence led by Hidalgo, in 1810, the patriot priest saw that he could rally the oppressed native races best by putting the image of the Virgin of Gua dalupe on his flag of freedom. The Spaniards met this by painting the image of the Virgin of Remedios on their flag. Under this leading the conflict was fought out most bitterly for twelve years, when the native blood and determination proved the stronger, and " Nuestra Senora de los Remedios," used by the Spaniards as their war-cry, was silenced, and herself and shrine sunk into disregard, deserted by all save the few Spanish families that remain and still adhere to her. Iturbide, when, in 1822, he joined the party of freedom as the leader of the creole class, was wise enough to discern that with the " Guadalnpana" — as the Spanish aristocracy designate the " Indian Virgin " — was the best prospect of victory, and he thus united a con siderable section of the wealth and intelligence of the cities with the cause represented by the Virgin of Guadalupe. The failure of the French intervention and overthrow of Maximil ian's empire, as already intimated, extinguished the last hope of the partisans of the Virgin of Remedios for her recovery of her former glory and influence. During the years of the dreadful conflict waged by the dev otees of their two Virgins it is almost amusing to contemplate how much and how earnestly these two ridiculous dolls were regarded and treated as real personages, whose active influence 56 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. was looked for to crown the cause of their respective devotees with the victory which they implored. On one occasion, when the republican cause seemed to be getting the worst of it, the fact was attributed to the presence and favor of the Virgin of Remedios, and her expulsion from Mexico was therefore re solved upon. The general-in-chief made out her passport in due form, and is said to have gone with some of his staff to her shrine, where he tore the general's scarf, which she wore, from her waist, and, delivering her passport to the attendant priests, ordered her immediate expulsion from Mexico ! This order her devotees, however, found means to avoid, and she remained. After peace was won and the republic established it was deemed necessary to end the disgraceful squabbles and liability of conflict between the partisans of the two Virgins by for bidding either party to take their favorite in public processions through the streets. The " Laws of Reform " made this ex cellent rule perpetual. The utter absurdity of this condition of things in religion, running on through the centuries, was endured by the dis tracted nation without either party seeming to realize how unworthy of reason and common sense was the pretension to divine authority in either case. We are here reminded of Ma dame Calderon's excuse for some scenes not very unlike these which she describes, probably the only one she, as a Roman Catholic, could offer : " However childish and superstitious all this may seem, I doubt whether it may not be as well thus to impress certain religious truths on the minds of a people too ignorant to understand them by any other process" (p. 108). This is a poor explanation to offer for a wealthy Church which had these millions in her power for three centuries, and whose first duty it was to cure them of their " ignorance " and " super stition " and to elevate them in sacred knowledge and morality. Alas, what a failure is Romanism in Mexico ! Over this wide world Protestant mission work needs no excuses, nor has it any where any such failures to answer for. Its converts are a credit to it, no matter how brief the period it has had them MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 57 under training. "Where it has had them for even a fourth part of the time above mentioned they have become a self-support ing, intelligent, and missionary Christianity, an honor and a blessing to the lands whose highest positions some of them are to-day filling. Before leaving the subject it is our painful duty to ask the reader's attention to'one more aspect of the utterly unwarranted idolatrous extravagance of doctrine which this Church built up on the ruins of Aztec heathenism. Those who only know Romanism as they see it in the United States or in England — for there it is astute and careful — can have little idea of the practices which that Church has encouraged in Mexico. Not only has she failed to give them the Gospel of Christ, but she presented them with " another gospel," in the sense which St. Paul so plainly condemns. We are conscious of the seriousness of the words which we now use, but the painful evidence is too abundant to be over looked. We will present only a very few out of the many samples, each from their own acknowledged authorities, to justify the charge which Protestantism brings against the terrible departure from the teachings of revealed religion. These errors center around the person of the mother of our Lord, who has by them been exalted out of the sphere which she occupies in the evangelical narrative, clothed with divine attributes and made the supreme object of human trust in the matter of salvation. All this without any warrant from the word of God, and in defiance of its spirit and teaching. Let us take a few of the titles which Mexicans have been taught to employ in common with their co-religionists elsewhere before introducing what is special in the teaching of the hier archy of Mexico. One of these is that the Virgin Mary is " the mother of God ; " and because evangelical Christians object to such a title being applied to any creature, and being in strict language impossible in itself, the Romish clergy there bit terly misrepresent us and our teaching and try to raise the 58 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. hatred of their fanatical followers against us as " revilers of the Virgin Mary." A human creature " the mother of God " is an utter im possibility. The stream cannot rise higher than its source. She became, as the Scriptures call her, " the mother of Jesus," who derived his manhood from her, but not his godhead. That god head existed in all its perfection a whole' eternity before the Virgin Mary was born, and therefore could not be born of her in time. She gave him all she had to give, her humanity, and that was all that her mission called for. " The man Christ Jesus " was her child, and to this humanity the divine and eter nal Son of God united himself and became " Emmanuel " by the unity, and was thus qualified to become the atoning Saviour of the human race. Another of those titles invented to lend color to the claim which they have set up to invest her with superhuman attri butes and give her a title to divine honors is that of "the divinized mother of God." * Concerning this pure and honored woman no one knows any thing beyond what is written in the four gospels and Acts of the Apostles, because her name is not once mentioned in any of the epistles, while the five apostolic fathers of the first century after Christ say nothing about her save what is given as above. " Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ" (Matt, i, 16), is the opening of the sim ple and beautiful record. Now let us put by the side of this the amazing and awful designations invented by Romanism to prove her to be " divinized," and as such the object of human trust and adoration. The announcement of the new doctrine of " the Immaculate Conception " of the Virgin Mary, in December, 1854, by Pope Pius IX., revised the shocking profanity of the rosary of " the Blessed St. Anne, Mother of the Blessed Virgin, and Gbandmotheb of God Almighty ! " f All this blasphemous language is recklessly employed to commend " the divinized mother of God" to the adoration of her worshipers, while * Christian World, vol. xiv, p. 254. f Ibid., vol. vi, p. 163. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 59 true Christians grieve and infidels mock at such impossible assumptions. Still another of these unauthorized titles adopted for this humble woman is that of " Queen of Heaven." As such she is represented in their picture on page 44, crowned with the infant Saviour in her arms. There is nothing to justify this picture ; it is manifestly false to the facts. Mary was the wife of a poor carpenter in a humble home, and the bauble of a crown never rested upon her brow. If answered that the picture rep resents her as she appears in heaven, that view of it is equally false, for it is impossible for her to appear as this represents in the eternal world, where Christ sits — not in her lap or in her arms, but " on the right hand of the Majesty on high." There seems something very unworthy in this constant at tempt to keep Jesus in his babyhood before the minds of Roman Catholic people. It minifies him, and eclipses the true glory of his immortal manhood and priestly functions by thus exalting his mother's patronage and power over him, notwith standing that eighteen hundred years have passed since she had the opportunity of such responsibility. Pius IX. took special delight in thus exalting the Virgin Mary. He says in his encyclical letter to the bishops of the Catholic world, December, 1864, that the Virgin Mary, " who, sitting as a queen upon the right hand of her Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, in a golden vestment, shining with various adornments, knows nothing which she cannot obtain from the sovereign Master." * The old gentleman does not condescend to inform the world by what authority he states this as to her position, the dress she wears, and the ornaments with which she is decorated. His word is to be accepted without question. He knows, how ever, no more about these things than the humblest person who reads his pompous encyclical. Her spirit, no doubt, is before the throne, waiting, like all the true saints, for the glorious resurrection of the dead. And yet in this false and unwarranted * Christian World, vol. xvi, p. 200. 60 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. teaching she is represented as embodied clothed in cloth of gold, wearing a crown and exercising her mediation for sinners here on earth as the great " Queen of Heaven." But heaven has no queen. The term is drawn from the Sabian idolatry > and as such is denounced and condemned by Almighty God in Jeremiah vii, 18, and xliv, 17. The two most popular books of devotion which they use are The Litany of the Dolorous Virgin Mary, prepared by Pope Pius VIL, and The Glories of Mary, by Ligouri. These books contain ascriptions to the Virgin of nearly every attribute of Almighty God ; but the climax is reached where she is repre sented as having by the act of the divine Father superseded the adorable Saviour as being more tender-hearted toward the sinner than he can be ! It is expressly taught in these books of their devotions that " the Lord Christ has assumed the administration of justice and punishment " toward men " and resigned to her the functions of grace and mercy ! " So the poor, misguided souls are taught to transfer their appeals and hopes to her in such prayers as these : " O Mary, we poor sinners know no refuge hut thee. Thou art our only hope. To thee we intrust our salva tion " (p. 130). This shocking inversion of the Gospel is then wound up in a grand doxology, putting her on a par with the adorable Trinity, at which I tremble as I copy it : I salute thee, 0 Great Mediatrix of peace between men and God ; O Mother of Jesus our Lord, the love of all men and of God : to thee be honor and blessing with the Father and with the Holy Spirit. Amen.* With assumptions and ascriptions like these Pins IX. carried his point and gave forth to the world, on the 8th of December, 1854, as an article of faith henceforth " necessary to salvation," his dogma of the Immaculate Conception of the Virgin Mary. In his missive he tells Christendom that he did this with a particular filial devotion and with our whole heart, to adore the blessed Virgin and to promote all that tended to her praise and glory, and whereby her worship might be more and more extended.f * The Glories of Mary, by Ligouri, and Christian World, vol. xxi, p. 10. f Christian World, vol. vi, pp. 212, 213. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 61 One might suppose that the widest departure from the Bible and apostolic Christianity had been reached when the above were written, but there was one step more that might be taken, and Cathohcism in Mexico has not shrunk from taking it. We now, with a heavy heart, present this additional evidence of the peculiar Mariolatry for the invention of which the Church has incurred such a fearful accountability to the Holy Trinity, as well as to the judgment of the Christian world, whose sen sibilities have been shocked as the facts became known that Romanists in Mexico have dared to adopt such language on such a subject. To be cautious to the fullest degree, I have had the inscription carefully copied from the tablet on the immense "reja," or iron screen, of the third chapel on the left as one enters the great cathedral in the city of Puebla. This is, next to the cathedral in the city of Mexico, regarded as the most im posing church on this continent. The tablet hangs in front of the Chapel of the Virgin of Guadalupe, and the inscription is in the form of a prayer to her. We' give first the original Spanish and then the translation : Oracion. Vfrgen santisima de Guadalupe, admirable Hija de Dios Padre, Madre de Dios Hijo, y Esposa de Dios Espiritu Santo, Senora mfa consagrada, primero santificada que creada, suplfcote Patrona y Senora mfa, que si en este dia, en este instante, en esta hora, d en lo restante de mi vida, 6 en la muerte, contra mi 6 contra cosa mfa alguna sentencia f uere dada, sea por vuestra intercesion revocada, y por mano de tu Hijo nuestro Sefior Jesu- cristo sea perdonada. Amen, Jesfis. The translation is as follows : Pkatbr. Most holy Virgin of Guadalupe, glorious daughter of God the Father, mother of God the Son, and wife of God the Holy Spirit, my Lady conse crated and sanctified before thou wast created: I pray thee, my patron saint and Lady, that if to-day, if this moment, if this hour, or if during the remainder of my life, or in death, any sentence should be passed against me or against any thing of mine, it may by thy intercession be revoked, and by the hand of thy Son our Lord Jesus Christ be turned aside. Amen, Jesus. 62 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. This awful language is not a thing allowed in the past times of ignorance only ; but in the recent issue of the Novena, or manual for nine days' prayer to the Virgin of Guadalupe, au thorized by the members of the " Chapter of Holy Mary of Guadalupe," in 1885, and printed by J. J. Little & Co., New York, the same expressions are found on the eleventh page, ending with these words : The Holy Spirit also has made thee the dispenser of all his gifts and graces. All the three divine persons concurred to crown thee at thy glo rious ascension to the heavens, and then there was conferred upon thee absolute power over all created in heaven and on earth. How heart-sickening to think that these extracts and that doxology are sanctioned by highest authority in the Roman Church ! No wonder that the millions of Mexicans have failed to find their Saviour, and that their services have degenerated into the heathenish spectacles such as we have presented. Thoughtful students of history, as they note the difference between nations, are impressed by the fact that wherever image- worship is met, there ignorance, degradation, and wretchedness abound. There is an adequate cause for this that can only be accounted for by the recognition that there exists an all-power ful Being whose decalogue is the supreme law of this world. The Almighty avows his position and purposes toward the vio lators of his holy law as expressed in the second commandment, who, making any " graven image, or any likeness of any thing in heaven above, or on the earth beneath," do " bow down to it, or serve it." The reason is given why he punishes this fear ful sin not merely with individual but with national judg ments : " For I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; and showing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my com mandments." No wonder the Romish priests fear to let their people "search the Scriptures;" no wonder that they exclude the MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 63 second commandment from many of their catechisms and nearly all their books of devotion. But it is a wonder that they do not realize the fearful responsibility which they assume in so doing, nor the account that they may yet have to render to God and to their people for having done so. Keeping close, as we Protestants do, to the Bible teachings, and ready at any hour to have our opinions brought to the test of the word of God, it is. unjust to call us " heretics." Con trast our position with the fluctuations and theological novel ties of the following list of dates of the doctrines now held by the Roman Church, not one of which is in the Bible, nor can be proved thereby, but several of which we have shown here to be contrary to its teaching, and it will be easy to decide who are the "heretics." DATES OF EOMISH DOGMAS. The Church of Rome claims to be apostolic, immutable, and infallible. The following table will show how far this is from being true : Prayer for the dead began a. d. 200 Worship of saints, martyrs, and angels 350 Worship of the Virgin Mary was developed about 431 Worship in an unknown tongue 600 Papal supremacy 606 Worship of images and relics imposed 788 Obligatory celibacy of the priests 1000 Infallibility of the Church 1076 Sale of indulgences 1190 The dogma of transubstantiation officially decreed 1215 Auricular confession officially imposed 1215 The cup kept back from the laity officially sanctioned. . . . 1415 Purgatory officially recognized 1439 Romish tradition put on a level with the Scriptures 1540 Worship of the Virgin of Guadalupe sanctioned by the pope. 1785 The Immaculate Conception proclaimed 1854 The pope's temporal power proclaimed 1864 Papal inf allibility proclaimed 1870 The last pope made the belief in the three items which he proclaimed a necessary condition of grace and salvation. 64 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. CHAPTER III. From darkness to dawn through conflict and suffering — Spanish rule — Viceroys — " Patriarch of Mexican Independence '' — His " Grito " and helpers — The Bravos — Odds against freedom — Iturbide and coronation — Unfortunate re turn — Monroe doctrine — Texan war and its object — McNamara and " Meth odist wolves" — General Fremont — War with United States — Treachery at Cherubusco — The hand of God — Hidden refuge for Bible study in the Canadas. Feom the year 1535 until the year 1821, when Mexico obtained her independence, the country was governed by sixty-one vice roys appointed by the Spanish crown. Their term of service extended over a period of two hundred and eighty-six years, giving to each viceroy an average of more than four years. Among these Spanish rulers there was occasionally found one of benevolent disposition and liberal ideas. But it must be con ceded that in the main the Spanish rule in New Spain was one of iron despotism, in which priest and soldier bore an equal part, until several millions of human beings, the constitutional ele ments of whose character were gentleness and docility, rose against their oppressors with the determination of driving them from the land. The Spaniards had acted so domineeringly in the exercise of their absolute rule, and in the monopoly of all places of trust and power, that they oppressed and insulted the native Mexicans until positive hatred was the result. Not only so, but they had also made the public service so close that even the " creole " class were by law excluded from any participation in it. The Cre oles were descendants of the Spaniards, members of their own families ; but under the rule that no country-born person should be allowed to participate in the government of the colonies in the slightest degree they were made to feel the inferiority of their birth. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 65 The legislation prepared in Spain for the government of these " colonies of the crown " was equally exclusive and oppressive, though New Spain was a hundred times larger than Old Spain, and far more populons ; yet at every point the laws were made to discriminate against the former, to the extent that the mul berry-tree or the silk-worm were not allowed to be cultivated, nor the vine grown (though both so genial to the soil). Mexico must purchase her wine and her silk of the mother- country or do without them, nor could her poor raise and sell them elsewhere and so assist themselves to this extent by their industry. The Spaniards were, in many cases, non-resident, living in Spain on the incomes remitted from their Mexican estates, and the rest occupying their high positions in the capital and lead ing points of the country. The Creoles numbered several hundred thousand. The Roman Church stood with the Spaniards, with all her influence and wealth, as against the popular wishes, save in those very few cases where some of the humble clergy (bet- ¦ ter than their system) ventured to sympathize with their poor people in the heavy burdens which they endured. Early in this century a movement had begun with the creole class to have the Spaniards share with them political rights, and in this desire the then viceroy, Iturrigaray, was disposed to concur, in the in terest of peace, if not of justice. It was a great blow aimed at caste 'after nearly three hundred years of monopoly ! But this kind concession cost the viceroy his position. He was re moved, and the Archbishop of Mexico was placed in power, until a new viceroy, of a sterner kind, was sent from Spain. The French Revolution and the changes made by the move ments of Napoleon L, including the removal of the Bourbons from the throne of Spain, reduced the prestige of the Spanish rule in Mexico and seriously lessened the power of the viceroys. This was intensified when the emperor placed his brother on the Spanish throne, thus giving a heavy shock to the doctrine of the "divine right of kings," and the immutability of estab lished order, and raising hopes that changes in the interests of 66 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. . liberty and right were to be expected and welcomed, and, if need be, fought for, by those who appreciated the sentiment, " Who would be free himself must strike the blow ! " The spirit of liberty became infectious, and was strengthened by the Consti tution granted by the new Cortes of Spain in 1812, which abolished the Inquisition and gave to Mexico more freedom than she had known since the Conquest. The viceroy was a cruel absolutist, and had no heart to welcome the beneficent change, and longed for its overthrow. The fall of Napoleon was fol lowed by the removal of his brother and the change of the liberal regimen in Spain. Ferdinand VIL, who was restored to the throne by the policy of the " Allied Powers," who met in Paris to reconstruct the map of Europe, was one of the most despotic of the Bourbons. He abolished the Constitution, restored the Inquisition, and absolute government once more oppressed the inhabitants of the Spanish peninsula. Stern orders were sent to withdraw all that had been conceded to the people of Mexico. Fearing the progress of the liberal ideas in that country as well as in the South American colonies, Ferdi nand was intending to dispatch a fleet and army to bring the Mexico and South American, colonies into submission. Before it was ready to sail the discovery was made that many of the officers had become infected with "this new fever of liberty," and even dared to express their displeasure at the service de manded of them, and were, indeed, more likely to lead the revolt in . Mexico than to suppress it. None others could take their places, and Ferdinand and his clerical sympathizers were openly criticised for their despotic plans till, alarmed for the stability of his throne, the Constitution was restored and the hostile expedition to Mexico abandoned. Next to personal redemption, that in which man most needs the intervention of Almighty God is in his aspirations for jus tice and freedom. Of these it is true that " every good gift, and every perfect gift, is from above." The apostles of liberty, as those of religion, are messengers of God, the author of liberty. The martyrs of both are under his vindication, accepting their MIGUEL HIDALGO, The " Patriarch of Mexican Independence." MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 67 work and crowning their efforts with success. So that in this sense also we hold that "The proper place for man to die Is where he dies for man; " or, better still, as they sang so enthusiastically during our civil war: "As He died to make men holy, Let us die to make them free ! " The honored men who laid the foundations of our republic, and the devoted man who dared to abolish slavery forever within our borders, appealed to the " considerate judgment of man kind and the gracious favor of Almighty God" for the rectitude of their intentions and the successful prosecution of the work before them. So also in Mexico the divine Spirit raised up de voted men who dared to face danger and death to secure the " good gift " of freedom for the millions around them. We have no doubt, when the facts are fairly stated, generous Ameri cans will admit that these are as worthy as any to be held in " everlasting remembrance." We now present to our readers the head of this illustrious line, Hidalgo, whom the Mexicans so delight to honor. He is called " The Liberator of Mexico," " The first Governor of Mexico by the National Will ; " and " The Patriarch of Mexican Independ ence." Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla was born on the 8th of May, 1753, received a liberal education, entered the Roman Cath olic priesthood, and at the time of his great effort was curate in the town of Dolores, in the State of Guanajuato. He was fully devoted to the welfare of his parishioners. Among other things he taught them the culture of the vine and the silk-worm, the making of porcelain and other small industries, by which their temporal condition began to improve. Although the spirit of freedom was in the air in 1810, and some relaxation of the cruel prohibitions of Spain against Mexico might have been taken for granted, these humble efforts of the kind-hearted cu rate were disapproved at head-qnarters as a daring innovation MEXICO IN TRANSITION. not to be tolerated. The viceroy gave orders for the destruc tion of the industries, and there was some talk of passing over Hidalgo to the Inquisition, where his notions might be inquired into, for he was known to entertain liberal views. When the agents of the viceroy reached Dolores, and Hidalgo saw with indignant sorrow all that he had accom plished for his people destroyed, the vines rooted up, the mul berry trees cut down, and the other works overthrown, the tyr annous act incensed him and his people, as it also aroused the general disapprobation of the nation. He was then nearly sixty years of age, and had previously been in correspondence with other lovers of liberty. The thought of independence had grown stronger in view of the weakening of the Spanish monarchy. Hidalgo had several persons on whom he could rely, some of them, priests of good reputation, assured him of their co-operation if he would lead the way. Satisfied that the time had come to strike the blow, Hidalgo prepared his declara tion of independence, made his flag, and on the 16th of Septem ber, 1810, displayed that flag and gave forth the " Grito," or cry of independence. His own people and the country around took up the cry, thousands flocked to his standard and placed themselves under his leadership. His first move was toward Guanajuato, where he believed some creole officers would join him with the men under their command. That city of 70,000 inhabitants is the center of the silver mining of the district. Hidalgo and his army were cordially welcomed and remained there for ten days organiz ing his troops. Again, and more formally, he proclaimed the independence of Mexico, and was announced as " captain-gen eral " of the forces. In the government treasury he found $1,000,000, which very opportunely supplied him with the sinews of war. The increasing crowd that he led was but half armed and entirely undisciplined, and it need not be wondered at that in the first hour of their power the arrogant conduct of their Spanish oppressors was remembered, and in that bitter re sentment for the wrongs so long endured by their race venge- MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 69 ance was taken upon some of them before Hidalgo and the leaders could restrain their men. Soon Valladolid, Guadalajara, and other cities fell into their hands. More patriots reached their camp, foremost among whom were the priests Morelos and Matamoros. This army swept on, the country rising in favor of the cause of independence, enthusiastically recogniz ing Hidalgo and his chiefs as representing the national will, and justly claiming the allegiance and help of all who loved their native country. In a few days they reached the crest of the great valley of Mexico, and a halt was there made to take council as to their movements. Right before them in the center of that valley was the capital, the possession of which would add thousands of sym pathizers to their numbers and soon place the whole country in their power. But a royal garrison held it, amply provided with the best armaments of the times, including artillery, and having well-disciplined cavalry. Hidalgo hesitated to lead his followers into a conflict so unequal. Numbers and courage were under his command, ample for any effort, but discipline, weapons, artillery, and cavalry he had not, and while some were for taking all the risks involved, and desirous of prompt attack, the leader and his officers concluded that it was safer for the sacred cause they had in charge to retire toward the United States frontier, where, with the money in hand, they could purchase all that they required, and meanwhile discipline and training would be organizing their followers to return again, better fitted for a con flict which now seemed so unequal. The order was given to turn northward. But the vigilant agent of the viceroy, General Calleja, was watching tlieir move ments and saw that he had them at a disadvantage. He con centrated his troops and followed, attacking them at Aculco and again at Calderon, inflicting terrible damages upon the undis ciplined crowd. The main body still held together and reached Saltillo in January, 1811. Here Hidalgo left Rayon in com mand, and with an escort pushed on for the Texan frontier to purchase the military equipment so much required. Unfortu- 70 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. nately, just before reaching it he and his party were betrayed, by a former friend named Elizondo, into the hands of the Spanards. Hidalgo and his three chiefs were at once loaded with chains and cast into prison. On the 29th of July he was led before the ecclesiastical tribunal, clad in clerical robes, for degradation from the priesthood. He was stripped of his sacerdotal garb, the chains and fetters put upon him again, and then was handed over for execution to the civil authority. It is narrated of him by those who witnessed the trying scenes that " even the chains and shackles could not detract from the dignity and patience that characterized him." He was led out to be shot on the morning of July 30, 1811. He faced his executioners with courage, and placed his hand over his heart as a guide to the soldiers' aim ; but it required the fifth volley to extinguish his noble life, the veneration in which he was held probably interfering with the accuracy of their aim. His offi cers, Jimenez, Aldama, and Santa Maria, had been executed three days before. The heads of all four were placed on spikes and elevated on the corners of the castle of Granaditas, in Guanajuato, and their bodies in the chapel of the Franciscans. When his cause was triumphant, twelve years later, the grate ful nation decreed them a public funeral, and the remains of these heroes were tenderly brought from the scene of their sufferings and deposited beneath the "Altar of the Three Kings," under the dome of the cathedral of the capital of the country for whose liberty they died. Certainly Hidalgo could not have dreamed of the glorious part which his tattered flag should bear in the future. On the eve of the 16th of September, the highest national holiday, at eleven o'clock P. M., in the Hall of Representatives, the presi dent, his cabinet, and the members of Congress, public men of Mexico, with all the brilliancy of society in the capital, crowd the structure and wait for the moment when the hands of the clock reach the hour at which Hidalgo first raised the cry of independence. Then the President of Mexico raises the old flag, waves it three times, and repeats the " Grito," " Viva la MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 71 Libertad ! Viva la Republica ! Viva Mexico ! " and the great audience rises to join in the shout, " Viva la Republica ! " as if they would lift the roof off the building. The thunder of the artillery gives its response to the popular joy, and the more than three hundred thousand people in the capital, and, indeed, the whole nation, remember gratefully the man who died to make them free. Visitors who are privileged to witness the scene can never forget its deep enthusiasm or fail to realize how much constitutional liberty cost the Mexican people and how dearly they prize it. On the death of Hidalgo the leadership devolved upon Jose Maria Morelos. He was also a priest, but a born warrior, and one who earned for himself in his brief career the popular title of " the hero of a hundred battles." His army continued to increase, and many victories were gained over the royalist forces ; in many cases the garrisons were surprised, the officers were imprisoned, and the troops induced to join the Republican army. Morelos became immensely popular, and men began to feel that the cause of independence was already won. In 1812 he was joined by theBravos (father and son), Guadalupe Victo ria, Bustamente, and Guerrero. Morelos was impressed with the necessity of having the movement for independence sustain a truly national character, and that its interests should be furthered by constitutional means. A Congress was gathered representing all classes of the Mexican people. It was limited in number, as it was subject to constant movement, and could be more easily protected from the pursuing army of the viceroy. The care of this Congress devolved upon Morelos ; while they deliberated, his division of the patriot forces stood over them to guard them from impend ing danger. A constitution was finally framed and proclaimed in October, 1814. Some time after the Congress was moving to a more distant point, when Morelos, discovering that the royal ist force was gaining upon them, decided to save the represent atives of the people by remaining with a small guard to check the progress of the enemy, while the larger part of the force, 72 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. under Nicolas Bravo, had time to conduct them to a place of safety. Having thus secured their escape, Morelos was unable to face the greatly superior force which confronted him, and was taken prisoner on the 15th of November. General Concha was amazed at the quiet resignation of his prisoner as he remarked, " My life is nothing if the Congress be saved ; my task was finished from the moment that an inde pendent government was established." He was taken to the capital, degraded by the bishop from the priesthood, and handed over to the secular power for execution. To increase the deg radation of his death it was ordered that he should be shot in the back as a traitor. The vindictive nature of the hierarchy, who exulted in his death, is seen in the cruel and reckless lan guage used in the document ordering his execution. He is characterized as " an uneonfessed heretic, and an abettor of heretics, a profaner of the holy sacraments, and a traitor to God, the king, and the pope." All this malignity was manufactured out of the one fact that this brave man loved liberty so much that he was willing to fight to see it established in his country. But the honorable name of Morelos could not be tarnished. His countrymen have conferred his worthy name upon the capital of one of their greatest States, and in Morelia his name is preserved as a shrine of freedom where men go to do homage to his memory. His portrait hangs in its principal hall, and beneath a frame holds the remnant of the silk handkerchief with which he covered his eyes in the hour of his execution, and underneath are the lines : " This is the venerated relic, The mournful bandage with which the tyrant Hid the gaze of Morelos, When the martyr of the Mexican people Offered to his beloved country His precious life as a sacrifice." How fearful the acts against the patriots is indicated in the records of the years between 1810 and 1820. The viceroys con ducted the war with a vengeance which is described as " proc- MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 73 lamations which make the hair stand on end." So says Chev alier, and adds: "A system of extermination was ordered. An order of the day of General Cruz, even still more revolting, directed that 'the insurgents should be pursued, incarcerated, and killed like wild beasts.' " An illustration of their spirit, which contrasts so favorably with the noble conduct of the patriotic leaders, is shown in the case of the two Bravos, father and son, both holding the rank of generals in the Republican army. The father was named Leonardo and the son Nicolas. They were devoted to each other as well as to the cause of their country. Leonardo Bravo was taken prisoner at the battle of Cuautla, was tried and con demned to be shot. Venegas, then viceroy, so highly appreci ated Leonardo's abilities that he offered him his life if he would induce his brothers and son, Nicolas, to join the royalists. Leonardo scorned such an offer. Before his execution, Nicolas Bravo, having in his hands as captives three hundred Spanish prisoners — some of whom were wealthy and influential men — was authorized by Morelos to offer to exchange the whole of them for his father. But the viceroy, appreciating the value of a Bravo to the popular cause, rejected the offer and ordered the execution to take place. The grief of Nicolas for his father was extreme, and he ordered his three hundred prisoners to be shot, and had them placed " in chapel" (religious preparation for death) for execution next morning. During the night he reflected that if his order was carried out, while he would be justified in the eyes of the world and by the usages of war in executing them under the circumstances, in retaliation for his father's death, the cause of independence, so dear to him, might be dishonored by the act. So his measures were taken, and at sunrise the next morn ing he was on the ground when his army stood confronting the prisoners and waiting for the order. Riding out in front, he thus addressed the doomed men : Tour lives are forfeited. Your master, Spain's minion, has murdered my father, murdered him in cold blood for choosing Mexico and liberty 74 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. before Spain and her tyrannies. Some of you are fathers, and may imagine what my father felt in being thrust from the world without one farewell word from his son ; aye, and your sons may feel a portion of that anguish of soul which fills my heart as thoughts arise of my father's wrongs and cruel death. And what a master is this of yours ! For one life, my poor father's, he might have saved you all and would not ! So deadly is his hate that he would sacrifice three hundred of his friends rather than forego this one sweet morsel of vengeance ! Even I, who am no viceroy, have three hundred lives for my father's. But there is a nobler revenge than this. Go 1 You are all free ! Go, find your vile master, and hence forth serve him if you can ! The effect was overwhelming. In gratitude to him for sparing their lives, the soldiers, with tears streaming from their eyes, rushed forward and offered their services to his cause, and remained faithful to him and to it to the end. General Bravo afterward bore a conspicuous share in the history of his liberated country. He lived to take part in the American war (1847), his last military service being at the de fense of Chapultepec and Molino del Rey. He died at the age of sixty-eight, beloved and admired by all who knew him. Meanwhile the Congress continued its labors, and had the courage to send a completed copy of the Constitution which they had framed to the viceroy Calleja. The royal council to whom he referred it solemnly condemned the document. The viceroy had a copy of it burned in the great plaza of Mexico by the public executioner, and ordered a similar cere mony performed in all the chief cities where Spain had a garri son. He also issued an edict which threatened with the death penalty and confiscation of property any one who was found with a copy of the Constitution in his possession, and forbade any person to refer to it. The peculiar difficulties under which the patriots of Mexico wrought out the freedom of their country will be made the more manifest and impressive when the actual facts are clearly understood. While the Mexicans studied with admiration, so far as they could from time to time obtain a view of the condition of peace and prosperity which the United States had won for MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 75 themselves, and longed to be like them, yet there were diffi culties in their way which our patriot fathers never knew, and burdens to be borne beyond all that they ever carried, while the shut-in condition of the Mexicans separated them from the light and intelligence which so brightly shone to guide our way to constitutional freedom. Let us mark the difference more definitely, that our Mexican neighbors may have the proper credit for the freedom which they won against such fearful odds. When our patriot fathers here pledged " life and fortune and sacred honor " to become independent and free, they had not been for three hundred years crushed down in ignorance and poverty, almost without hope or aspiration. No powerful viceroy wielding the military forces of a foreign despot was in power to repress every utter ance for liberty or " hunt them down like beasts of prey " when they attempted to obtain it. No great landed aristocracy, owning every acre of the soil, laid its heavy hand upon them in vengeance. No wealthy established Church united its ghostly power with the civil despotism to repress them, bringing to its aid the remorseless Inquisition and their spiritual maledictions, adding blasphemously the terrors of God and of eternity to utterly crush their cause and their hopes as unlawful. Nor were they cut off from the sea and its resources or left without one friendly nation on the earth to extend sympathy or a help ing hand to them in the unequal struggle, nor so destitute of resources that they had to win battles to obtain weapons and ammunition to continue the conflict. All these disabilities the patriot Mexicans had to endure for years ere they were able to stand on equal terms with the combined and relentless foes of their freedom. All they had to begin with was tlieir own right hands and noble leaders, who " loved not their lives unto the death," to make their nation a land of liberty. Generous Americans will give worthy credit to such a people, and to the patriots who led them at last to the liberal institutions which they now enjoy. To all this we may add that the land was, from end to end, 76 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. without the Bible, the school, or the most elementary literature ; that even their Constitution (when they gained one) had not the doctrine of religions liberty in it, for that they had to learn at a later day, when Benito Juarez enshrined it in his glorious Constitution of 1857, and thus crowned the freedom of his country. It surely may be questioned whether a people ever won constitutional liberty under greater disadvantages than these had to endure during their struggles from 1810 to 1857. Matters moved slowly during the four following years, but in 1820 events in Spain again revived the hopes of the Mexi can Liberals, and they renewed their efforts for independence. This led the viceroy to re-organize his army for offensive oper ations and to call once more to his aid the creole Colonel Augustine Iturbide, who had already made himself famous in the war against Hidalgo and Morelos. The Spanish forces then in Mexico and subject to the viceroy's orders amounted to eleven regiments, while the patriot army was estimated at twenty-four regiments ; but they were more widely scattered than was the royal army, less disciplined, and but half armed. Iturbide was appointed by the viceroy to the command of the Army of the South-west. About this time it came to be supposed that Ferdinand VIL, in view of the insecurity and unrest of his Spanish throne, was considering the question of abandoning that uneasy seat in Madrid for a quieter one in Mexico, where he might find more devoted subjects and an asylum from revolutions. Some of the Liberals were led to suppose that they could obtain constitu tional freedom under Ferdinand, and were willing to consider the question. This led to a temporary cessation of hostilities, and to the removal of the despotic viceroy. A man of more gentle character, named O'Donoju, was sent in his place. Yield ing to the patriotic influences brought to bear on him, Iturbide had just before (February 24, 1821) issued to the nation what was called the " Plan of Iguala," or the " Constitution of the three Guarantees " — religion, independence, and union. In re ligion the nation was to be Roman Catholic, without toleration MEXICO IN TRANSITION. of any other faith — independence of the entire country from Spain ; union conceding the equal rights of the native races with those of the Creoles and Europeans. This proposal was such an immense advance toward freedom that the "Plan" took extensively with the masses, while the enlightened leaders, on reflection, regarded it with suspicion as being too churchly to be safe for complete liberty. The new viceroy and Iturbide met at Cordova and discussed the situation. A few modifications in the plan satisfied the viceroy, who consented to become one of the members of the " Provisional Junta " to carry on the government until a mon arch could be obtained. On reflection Ferdinand declined the offered throne. The crown-princes of Spain also refused to come. Each thought he had interests at home that would be compromised, and the whole affair dropped to the ground. During these negotiations the viceroy died, and none other had been appointed before events hurried on to a conclusion. Itur bide was now standing at the head of affairs. His "Plan" went forth to the nation, the first article of which declared as follows : " The Mexican nation is independent of the Spanish nation, and of every other, even on its own continent." By this act Mexico virtually became independent of Spain, and Spain was then so much disturbed and impoverished that she was unable to do more than protest ; and so Mexico and South America were left, at least for the present, to organize them selves as they chose under the circumstances. But it does seem singular that after all the long years of strife Mexico should have effected her independence without shedding another drop of blood. The Spanish flag, after having floated for just three hundred years, was hauled down on the 24th of February, 1821, and thus the good seed sown by Hidalgo and his followers was in great part harvested by the hand of Iturbide eleven years afterward. Iturbide had already secured an understanding with Guerrero, the Republican leader, for uniting the two armies in view of independence. Had he been satisfied to have remained a pop- 78 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. ular leader he would probably have been promptly elected con stitutional President of Mexico. But Iturbide was not a patriot, and thought more of his own interests than of those of his country. Chance threw in his way the opportunity of doing a great service to the nation without suffering or risk to himself, and he did it, and thus earned the designation of " The Liber ator of Mexico." Those who knew him well and remembered his antecedents believed him to be heartless and animated by personal ambition. Republicans could not forget that Good Friday in 1814 (of which Chevalier gives the account in his second volume), when, to celebrate his victory at Salvatierra, two or three days pre viously, over the feeble patriotic forces, in the mere wantonness of his power he resolved to " celebrate the day becomingly " by shooting the three hundred Republican prisoners whom he had taken, on the pretext that " they were excommunicated persons, and that the Spanish authorities employed spiritual weapons as well as swords, muskets, and cannon in subjugating the Inde pendents ! " So, to please the hierarchy and consummate their work, Iturbide doomed those men to die like dogs — not on the battle-field, but on the parade-ground — because the Church had excommunicated them for taking up arms to win the liberty of their native land ! Now, however, he had done Mexico a good ' turn, and men hoped he might prove worthy. A new Congress in which the clergy were well represented was in session, and great solicitude was felt as to the form of government. This body stood in the way of Iturbide's ambition to reign, of which the patriots learned with alarm. Having gained the attach ment of many of the officers and promised large concessions to the Church, his first move was to have a number of his partisans parade the streets shouting, " Long live Augustine I: ! " The next day the Congress debated the question, while the galleries were crowded with adherents of Iturbide, who was also present. Some voted to appeal to the various States, but a vote was forced (May 19, 1822) which awarded the imperial crown to Iturbide. The church party gave their influence, as well they MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 79 might, considering what was wrapped up in the plan of Iguala, from which the Republicans were beginning to fall away. Every thing was done to make the coronation a gorgeous cere mony. An archbishop and many bishops added their dignity to the occasion. The great cathedral was made to display all its resources of magnificence. On the 21st of June, with music, processions, illuminations, incense, joy-bells, and salvos of artil lery, he was anointed and crowned at the high altar as Augus tine the First. A heavy civil list was voted, an imperial court was arranged, his children were entitled as princes, and an aristocracy was instituted. The Spanish government contempt uously repudiated the movement, but was unable then to reverse it. Unfortunately for Iturbide's welfare, he soon began to presume too much upon the power of his position. The Spaniards were unduly favored in the gifts of offices and honors, the representatives of the nation were treated to some manifes tations of arbitrary conduct that were unpleasant, and a de mand for more centralized power in the Imperial hands was advanced. These and other kindred developments opened the eyes of the people to the consciousness that they had not gained much by this change of masters. Just here a name looms up that was to fill a large space in the future history of Mexico, and which became, by force of circumstances, better known to Americans than any other south of our own border for the fol lowing forty years. Santa Anna was at this time in military command at Vera Cruz. Hearing how matters were going on at the capital, and perceiving therein an opportunity to push himself into prominence by resistance to a man whom many were already beginning to regard as a tyrant, he raised the standard of revolt and " pronounced " against Iturbide. Yet to Iturbide he owed his own position, as he had been raised by the emperor within a few months past from the rank of captain to that of general. The Republican leaders, Victoria, Guerrero, and Nicolas Bravo, supposing Santa Anna sincere in his profes sions of freedom, hastened to join him with their followers. Iturbide soon realized that he had forfeited the confidence of 80 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. his subjects, that civil war was upon him, and he was powerless to meet it with any hope of victory. So on the 20th of March, 1823 — just nine months* after his elaborate coronation — he tendered his resignation. The Congress, however, refused to accept it, on the ground that it had not voluntarily elected him emperor, and proceeded to form a provisional government composed of four revolutionary chiefs — Bravo, Victoria, Negrete, and Guerrero. Sentence of exile was pronounced against Iturbide, but in view of his services in securing inde pendence the Congress voted him a pension of $24,000 per annum, on condition of his leaving the country and residing in Italy, without the right to return to Mexico. Accepting these terms, Iturbide left, with his family, for Italy. Happy had it been for him and them had he kept his word with the Mexican nation, but on the 14th of July, 1824 — only fourteen months after his departure — he returned, with his family, to Mexico, landing at Sota la Marina, in the State of Tamaulipas, when he was arrested by the governor and executed. The Congress granted a pension of $8,000 to the family, which went forthwith to reside in the United States, where the son, Don Angel Itur bide, became a student at the Jesuit college at Georgetown, D. O, and there married an American lady of the Romish com munion, daughter of Mr. Nathaniel Green, of that city. A son of this marriage, " Prince Augustine," as he is regarded by the church party in Mexico, represents the dead emperor, and is the connecting link between the past and the present. After his father's death he remained in Mexico, with his mother, and was there during the French intervention. Toward the close of the empire of Maximilian, who was childless, this boy attracted the attention of the Empress Carlota, and was adopted with the intention of making him heir to the throne, but on the collapse of the empire he was surrendered again to his mother. After ward he entered the same college that his father had attended, and on completing his course returned to Mexico, while he took a subordinate position in the army. Here,, after a couple of years, he was charged with some acts of insubordination toward MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 81 his superior officer, and after trial was sent to prison for fifteen months. Meanwhile his mother had died, and on his release lately he left for the United States. This, no doubt, ends the probability of the Iturbide family being any further a disturbing element in Mexican history. The fall of Iturbide closed the empire, and a republic, on the model of the United States (save the one item of full relig ious freedom), was established under a constitution, in October, 1824, General Victoria becoming first constitutional President of Mexico, remaining in power until April, 1829. By this time Spain had recovered a measure of her strength and took the resolution to reconquer Mexico and South Amer ica. A small army was landed at Tampico under the com mand of General Barradas, but it was soon after defeated by the Republican army under Santa Anna and General Teran, and forced to quit Mexico. These events intensified the hatred of the Spaniards, already strong enough. In a moment of irritation the Congress voted the exile of all Spaniards from the country, but it was not fully carried out. From that hour, however, Spanish influence has declined, and the Mexicans have come to the front in public affairs. What remain of the Span iards in Mexico have generally continued faithful to their preference for monarchical government, and did what they could for its re-establishment in Mexico during the following thirty years. The events which we have now rapidly enumerated, com mencing with the declaration of independence by Iturbide in 1822 — an event which led the United States to acknowledge that independence in the same year — were the facts which, in the interests of the peace and political welfare of this continent, led President James Monroe to issue in 1823 that doctrine of reciprocity of non-intervention which has ever since been asso ciated with his name, and which has done so much to preserve our own nation from entanglement with European quarrels. It had equally preserved us and the neighboring nations from disturbance from foreign powers from that time up to the 7 82 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. year 1862, when it was so maliciously violated by Napoleon III. and led to the fearful events which the further part of this nar rative is to lay before our readers. The first effect of that doctrine was seen in the fact above intimated, that Spain never attempted a repetition of the barbarous purpose she undertook in 1829, to force her cruel rule on an unwilling people, while the failure of the last attempt has, no doubt, settled that question for this continent for all time to come. The accepted summary of this grand doctrine, under the protection of which the nations of North, Central, and South America are resting, maybe here presented. It runs thus : The American continents, by the free and independent condition they had assumed and maintained, are no longer to be considered subjects for colonization by European powers. Any attempt on the part of European powers to extend their political systems to the western hemisphere would be considered dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States. Any interposition by such powers to oppress or control the governments that had declared their independence and maintained it, and whose independ ence had been acknowledged by the United States, would be viewed as unfriendly to the United States. The political systems of Europe could not be extended to any portion of the American continent without endan gering the peace and happiness of the United States, and such extension would not be regarded with indifference. From 1822 to 1855 the name of Santa Anna was the most con spicuous in Mexican politics, chiefly as the most active disturber of the peace of the nation. His clerical patrons knew well how to utilize his remarkable qualities, though it must be con fessed that his eye to the main chance was always as keenly open for his own advantage as for the promotion of their purposes. His vanity and love of display are apparent in the picture opposite, where his breast is covered with decorations that were never won nor conferred, though they were assumed, and were his because he had paid for them ! His despotic acts no doubt postponed by twenty years the rest of constitutional freedom that would have been won but for his reckless interferences. His full name was Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna. His home was at Manga de Clavo, near Jalapa, where he had an GENERAL SAXTA A.NXA, The turbulent Dictator of Mexico. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 83 estate, the extent of which Madame Calderon tells us was twelve leagues, between that city and Vera Cruz. Mrs. F. C. Gooch truly says of him that When only twenty years old he entered the arena of politics by disrupt ing the empire established by Iturbide, and the career thus begun was consistently carried out. At an early age he had so mastered the arcana of scheming and revolution as to reflect credit on a veteran in the cause, demolishing and creating sovereignties, often grasping victory from defeat, and gathering strength when all seemed lost. He was five times president, and was the means of deposing, probably, twenty rulers. As a commander of men his resources and ability were remarkable. After the most disas trous defeat he generally managed to retire from the scene still holding the confidence of his ragged, half-starved army, increasing it materially while on the move. His fertile brain was ever ready to plan a revolution or arrange a coup d'etat. In the change which he fomented of establishing a central system, abolishing the federal power, every State was deprived of its share of control and all authority lodged in the hands of the executive in Mexico city. No wonder that Yucatan and Texas rebelled and resolved to establish each a separate gov ernment. This was the origin of the war with Texas, and that developed into the war with the United States. Santa Anna is best remembered by Americans for his attempt to whip back the Texans into the traces, when they made their effort for independence of Mexican control, and also for his infa mous perfidy in executing the little Texan force under Colonel Fannin, after they had surrendered under written stipulation that their lives should be spared. Nor will he be soon forgotten in our history in connection with his capture by General Houston and his little army of Americans and Texans on the 21st of April, 1836, or the inordinate vanity that he displayed when led into the presence of Houston. Santa Anna laid the flattering unction to his soul that he was himself a hero of the highest class. He had already given himself the amazing title of " The Napoleon of the South ! " and expected of his followers that he should be so regarded. The record tells us that even in his fallen condi tion as defeated and a prisoner, when he was led into the Texan 84 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. camp and to Houston's presence, he pompously announced him self as "Antonio L6pez de Santa Anna, the President of Mexico, who surrenders as your prisoner ; " and then added, as he looked at General Houston, " Yon are born to no common destiny, who are the conqueror of the Napoleon of the South ! " The treaty signed recognized the independence of Texas and prompt evacuation of Texas by the Mexican army, and solemnly pledged Santa Anna and his four generals (who all signed with him) to obtain its confirmation by the government of Mexico. How much value there was in the promises and the signature of this hypocritical character was evident enough when, about six months afterward, on reaching Mexico, he publicly repudi ated the convention into which he had entered and had signed, on the contemptible ground that " obligations contracted by an individual under duress were absolutely void ! " He thus proved himself to be as false and hypocritical to his own parole as he was in respecting the conditions which he violated in the case of the brave Texans who unfortunately trusted his promises at Goliad and San Antonio. During his parole in the United States ere he returned to Mexico he visited Washington and had an interview with Presi dent Jackson, upon which he afterward liked to dilate, as the writer had opportunity to hear him do toward the end of his career. Disgraced in the eyes of his countrymen by his failure in the Texan campaign, Santa Anna retire/! to his estate and remained there until the following year, when a hostile visit of the French navy to Vera Cruz made his services again desirable. He was placed in command of the army at that port, and in re pulsing the French troops on the 5th of December, 1838, he lost one of his legs. This mended his reputation somewhat, but laid him aside until the events of 1841 once more called him out, and he became president again, but soon took advan tage of his position and proclaimed himself dictator. It may interest the reader and throw some additional light upon the great transition through which Mexico had to pass on her way from such follies to respectability and character in her MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 85 public life, if we take another glance at the whimsicalities of the man whom we leave here for the present as the arbitrary dictator of his suffering country. Some of them seem incredi ble, but we have the authority for them all. "The fantastic tricks before high Heaven" which Santa Anna was so fond of playing may refer us again to that left leg, which he lost by a shot from the Prince de Joinville's artil lery. He had it carefully boxed up, and sent it from Vera Cruz to his admirers in the capital, accompanied by an eloquent letter breathing great patriotism. The stratagem succeeded, and the leg was appropriately cared for until a magnificent monument, surmounted by the national insignia, was prepared to receive it. Santa Anna returned to the capital before the monument was quite finished, and it is said went in the procession to the burial of his own leg ! It was deposited with all the honors. He de fended the affair very laconically by remarking that, " It was a Christian leg, and deserved to have a Christian burial ! " The newspapers of the day announced the event as follows : Mexico, September 28, 1842. — Yesterday was buried with pomp and solemnity, in the cemetery of St. Paul, the leg which his excellency, Presi dent Santa Anna, lost in the action of December 5, 1838. It was depos ited in a monument erected for that purpose, Don Ignacio Sierra y Rosa having pronounced a funeral discourse appropriate to the subject. Gilliam, while referring to these facts, was reminded of an event which has a good parallel in it. He says : It is true that while Benedict Arnold, the traitor, was in London he in- quired of an American what the people of the United States would do with him if he should return to his home. The American replied that the leg in which he had received an honorable wound, in his career for liberty and independence, would be separated from his body and buried with all military honors ; but that his body would be hung between heaven and earth as a traitor to his country.* As Santa Anna stood before the crowd around that monu ment where this singular funeral was so pompously conducted, * Travels over the Table-Lands and Cordilleras of Mexico during 1843-44, by A. M. Gilliam, p. 119, and Calderon's Life in Mexico, p. 368. 86 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. how little he imagined what would there occur within only two years after ! During this brief term of time he could not be satisfied with being president ; he must assume dictatorial powers and try to bend the Congress to his will. Even the archbishop, at the head of the church party, pronounced against his tyran nical policy of levying a forced loan of $4,000,000 — the most odious of all imposts, because so opposed to the principal object for which governments are founded, the security of the prop erty of the people. His effort excited universal indignation throughout the republic and caused his overthrow. Even his army refused to fight for him, and deserted, so that he was now " The leader of a broken host, His standard fallen and his honor lost." He had to surrender himself into the hands of his bitter foes, who sent him a prisoner to the gloomy fortress of Perote, within whose walls many of the victims of his vindictive policy had pined in days gone by. During the tumult in December, 1844, the monument was desecrated, and the leg it contained was dragged from its resting-place and kicked through the streets by the rabble ! This was all the more humiliating to him because he had during this very dictatorship indulged so freely in that extravagance of display and vulgar love of pageantry for which he was so noted. After ten years of independence Texas applied for admission to the United States. The resolutions providing for her annex ation awakened hot debate in Congress and violent discussions all over the country. Into the debates entered the great ques tion of African slavery in the Union. To annex Texas was sure to involve the United States in a war with Mexico. To advocate war for the sake of extending slavery and increasing the slave power of the Union was enough to excite the most bitter oppo sition from the Whig and the Free Soil parties. Texas contained two hundred thousand square miles of un disputed territory, out of which, Senator Benton, of Missouri, said in Congress, " nine slave States could be made, each equal to MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 87 the State of Kentucky." This would give, he argued, a pre dominant slave representation in the government. Here, then, we find the great underlying cause of the war which so soon followed. Mr. Calhoun, also in the Senate, at the close of this Texan war, maintained the right of slave-holders to carry and hold their slaves in all the free territory acquired by conquest from Mexico.* It is honorable to Mexico just here to call attention to the fact that, as soon as this purpose was avowed, her republican sons protested against such a desecration of the territory which they had made free by abolishing slavery forever from every part of it. But all in vain, as we shall see. Our Southern slave holders, infatuated, forgot Him who is " higher than the high est," who was able to defeat their purposes. At this period an event occurred which was to prove of the highest moment to the future of the United States and Mexico. The war-ships of the British and American navies were hover ing off the coast of California, each anxious to arrive before the other, so as to land and run up the flag and take possession in the name of their government. Colonel Fremont, with a small force, having the same object in view, was operating in the in terior. But there was another party also, representing a differ ent government from either, who was anxiously pushing a proj ect of his own to secure that California for his master and a very different future. We have heard of that wonderful map which hangs in the library of the Propaganda at Rome, said to be the largest map of the United States in existence, on which are definitely marked all the points of interest and prospective importance and power in our great West and away to the Californian coast. It was an immense work then to ascertain and locate these points so well and so quietly, " while men slept," unconscious that the papacy was preparing to preempt in advance the strategic points of these broad lands for its own purposes. These facts were presented by Rev. Dr. Ellinwbod in an able paper read * See History of the War with Mexico, by H. 0. Ladd. 88 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. before the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in 1881. We copy so much as refers to our subject. He said : But while a Mexican dictator had grasped despotic power, and our statesmen had planned for territory which would render slavery secure, there were other schemes afloat. Testimony now to be found in the archives of the State department at Washington shows that in the years 1845 and 1846, just as our conflict with Mexico was commencing, an Irish Catholic missionary in California, of the name of McNamara, conceived a plan for planting on a very large scale a colony of Irish Catholics in the rich valley of the San Joaquin River. In an intercepted letter to the Mexican president Father McNa mara says: "I have a triple object in my proposal. I wish, first, to ad vance the cause of Catholicism ; second, to promote the happiness and thrift of my countrymen ; and, thirdly, to put an obstacle in the way of the further usurpations of that irreligious and anti-Catholic nation — the United States. And if the plan which I propose be not speedily adopted your excellency may be assured that before another year the Californias will form a part of the American nation. The Catholic institutions will become the prey of Methodist wolves, and the whole country will be in undated with cruel invaders." The grant of the land was made; and, according to the testimony given before a committee of Congress, General Castro had armed and organized the Mexican Californians, and had en gaged the Indian tribes to help to exterminate the American settlers, when the whole scheme was reported at Washington. Captain Gillespie was at once dispatched as a secret messenger to Gen eral Fremont, then on the Oregon border. After many hair-breadth escapes from the Indians the message was delivered. Fremont turned back, rallied the American settlers, levied on horses, guns, and stores, and with the suddenness of a thunder-bolt routed the Mexican force, broke up a junta which had been appointed to nego tiate with the British Admiral Seymour, then off the coast, to establish a British protectorate, and on the 5th of July, 1846, having learned of the declaration of war between Mexico and the United States, he ran up the Stars and Stripes, and California was saved for the "Methodists." These events are wonderfully like those which had transpired in Ore gon a short time before ; and it is fortunate for Christian civilization that the result was the same in both cases.* Further light is thrown upon this subject by a paper furnished to the Century Magazine by Mrs. Jessie Benton Fremont, * Mexico, Her Past and Present Resources, in The New York Evangelist, June 30, 1887. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 89 widow of General Fremont. From this it appears that McNa mara was a British subject, but working in the interest of a project originated at Rome to checkmate the growing Protest antism of the United States. He had succeeded in interesting both the civil and religious authorities at Mexico, who had con sidered and indorsed this colonization plan, in which he had engaged to locate ten thousand families, to each of whom he was to apportion a square league of land. Mexican authority in that great West was then a mere shadow, without force and unable to sustain itself against the American element scattered through the country, if they would only come together and set up a government of some kind. Hence the efforts made by McNa mara to hasten the British Admiral Seymour to land in Califor nia, raise his flag, and take possession. He had almost secured his prize of 13,500,000 acres, from San Francisco to the San Gabriel Mission, near Los Angeles, the San Joaquin River and the Sierra Nevada being the boundaries. The Mexican gov ernor, Pio Pico, issued this immense tract of land to Father McNamara " on the express condition that the grant was to keep out the Americans." But Fremont and his band suc ceeded in raising the United States flag that very day at Mon terey before Admiral Seymour could arrive and act in McNa- mara's interest. California was thus added to the United States, and his plan was utterly defeated. The following year the treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo closed the war with Mexico and confirmed by purchase as well as conquest the possession of California to our Union.* A brief reference to our war with Mexico is necessary here. Santa Anna (who was recalled from exile to aid in the strug gle) took the field at the head of twenty thousand men. He met General "Zachary Taylor at Buena Vista, and suffered a heavy defeat. At Cerro Gordo he was vanquished, after which he retreated to defend the capital, but Molino del Rey, Chapul tepec, and Mexico city surrendered to General Scott. * Compiled from Mrs. Fremont's manuscript, in the Century Magazine, April, 1891. 90 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. The Stars and Stripes floated over the national palace in Mexico from September 14, 1847, till June 12, 1848. The concessions demanded by the United States government were embodied in the treaty signed at Guadalupe by the plenipoten tiaries of both nations on the 2d of February, 1848. By this treaty Mexico surrendered territory about equal to one half of her former extent, making the enormous total of our southern and south-western border of 851,590 square miles ; seventeen times the size of the great State of New York, including ten degrees of latitude on the Pacific coast, and extending a thou sand miles to the east. It is true that $15,000,000 of compensation and a release from $3,250,000 of claims of United States citizens on Mexico were tendered and accepted by the vanquished nation. But the Mexican government well knew that the acceptance of the sum offered was obligatory, though it was not, even then, more than a fraction of its value, not to mention the hundreds of millions which the mines of California were to yield in all the future to the United States ! To this was added the bitter re flection to the Mexican administration that after they had, in their honest and painful efforts to establish a true republican government in their country, abolished slavery forever, and now when they entreated, in the framing of this treaty with tlieir conquerors, that a clause should be inserted committing the United States not to permit slavery to be established in any part of the ceded territory, they were met with a disdainful refusal, and their honorable demands were rejected by the great republic, the power that of all on earth should have been to them a friend in their struggle to maintain the liberty they had established. Instead of this, our nation was led to wage this unnecessary and unjustifiable war inN the interest of the Southern slave-holders and for the wider extension of tlieir wicked institution. For abundant evidence of this fact we refer the reader to the book of Mr. Jay,* where, from page 150 * A Review of the Causes and Consequences of the Mexican War. Boston. Mussey i. Co., 1849. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 91 to 195, will be seen, from the action and language of our gov ernment and the debates in Congress, that the extension of the area of slavery was the paramount object of the war with Mexico. It is enough to make any lover of freedom tremble to im agine what the result would have been to the future of the world and of Christian civilization had the purpose of the Southern oligarchy been carried out as they intended. The gain of this immense territory made them so bold that they next planned the abolition of all restriction throughout the country, so that they might have power of control over their slaves from the Canada line to the Gulf of Mexico. The Fugitive Slave Law was passed in their interest, and the hunted slave was no longer safe wherever the Stars and Stripes floated. The surprise and excitement of the nation, and especially of our liberty-loving millions, became intense, while the haters of constitutional freedom indulged their bitter sarcasm at our expense. We were on the high road to the building up, over this wide land, from the Atlantic to the Pacific, of the most colossal empire of negro slavery that the world had ever seen. It only needed time for development, and to be left unhindered by God and man to become even far worse and more awful than that " open sore of the world " of which Livingtone spoke in Africa. Worse, because the Arabs there have set that sore running under the sanction of their Koran, while our sacred Book, in its spirit and precepts, forbids such injustice. So men who were ruled by their consciences and who feared God declared that they would not be forced to aid or to perpet uate an institution so unchristian. Slave-holders professed to laugh at our reverence for the " higher law," and our convic tions, and were determined to force obedience to the Fugitive Slave Law, even declaring that they would erelong " call the roll of their slaves under the shadow of Bunker Hill." Slowly the great North arose to the duty which she owed to God and humanity to free herself from what Mr. Wesley designated as 92 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. " the sum of all villainies." Judge Harrington, of Vermont, well voiced the conscience of the North in that case where the slave-hunter had overtaken his victim and brought him into court to demand his rendition, offering the proof of ownership in the bill of sale to the person whom he represented. The worthy judge closed the case when he ruled that, " This title is invalid here. I demand a bill of sale from the Almighty ! " So the slave went forth to freedom. The word of God is the instrument to unify the world, and these mighty movements were in his providence to open its way to its great mission among men. In our war with Mexico the Bible entered to begin its beneficent work in the hands of the Aztecs. There were a few there who had heard of it, though they had not seen it ; but they welcomed it, for they were longing for a clearer knowledge of the way to salvation. A small number of these were priests, like Orestes, Gomez, and others. Among the laity more were anxious for its introduc tion, for they had learned that the Bible stood well with liberty, that Bible readers every-where were free men, that the most en lightened nations were those where the Holy Scriptures had the fullest circulation, and they desired the help of such a book in their struggle for popular freedom. When the war with Mexico was proclaimed in 1847 the American Bible Society grasped the opportunity and appointed Rev. M. Norris as agent, an edition of the Spanish Scriptures being then just published. Mr. Norris went with the army and distributed many copies, and was aided by some of the men and officers. An account of what was done in this respect was written by Major-General Casey in 1850. We will quote one fact of special interest on the sub ject, to show how some of the educated people looked at the wonderful book, now for the first time within their reach. He writes : The occupying of the city of Mexico by our army, considering the obstacles which were to be overcome, naturally excited a new train of thought among the intelligent and thinking Mexicans. They would ask these questions of one another : "How is it that these people, whom we had MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 93 been taught by our priests to consider as God-forsaken heretics, over come all obstacles which have been opposed to them from Vera Cruz to this city, and then with a comparative handful of men have broken through the three lines of fortifications with which our city was surrounded and taken possession of the capital of our republic ? Our city had a popula tion of 200,000, and besides it was under the special protection of Mary of Guadalupe, who in many priestly processions about our streets was inter ceded by us. These people possess and are zealously distributing a book from which they profess to derive their religion, and from which we also pretend to derive ours. May it not possibly be that the priests from interested motives have corrupted the teachings of the truth ? " A little leaven has been planted in Mexico which by God's blessing will leaven the whole. At this time General Casey held the rank of captain, and in this capacity led the storming party at Cherubusco, where the American army suffered its greatest loss, chiefly by the treachery of some of its own soldiers. His account of this affair is as follows : On the 20th of August the battles of Contreras and Cherubusco were fought. At the latter place the principal point of attack was a fortified convent, and the American army lost 1,000 men in killed and wounded by the obstinate resistance. This was caused by the presence of more than two hundred deserters from the American army, composed mostly of Catholic Irish, who had been persuaded to desert by the instigation of the Mexican Catholic priests. Fifty of these men were afterward captured and hung, the drop at the gallows falling just as the American flag went up on the castle of Chapultepec. When the final assault on the city was made by the causeway, at the extremity of which the castle of Chapul tepec was situated, we had but little more than 6,000 men.* The sectarian treachery of the Irish deserters might have proved to be overwhelming. Yet Mr. Jay considers the pun ishment as excessive.-)- But it is only fair to remember that this had to be judged in the light of the emergency which their desertion, and the turning of their weapons against their gov ernment in the presence of the enemy, had created. It might have involved the destruction of the whole American force, which was so small comparatively. As it was it cost them * Christian World, vol. xxiv, p. 47. \ Review of the Mexican War, p. 208. 94 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. nearly one seventh of their whole number. Nor should it be forgotten that this was not the first time. A few months be fore a similar act of treachery had occurred in General Taylor's command at Monterey, by the same class of men deserting and crossing the river to join their co-religionists on the other side and help them fight the Americans. While Christians may well seek the intervention of the Omniscient One to guard against dangers of this class, the patriot is equally bound to use his vigilance to counteract them. On some occasions yet to come the celebrated order may need to be repeated as a precau tion, "Put none but Americans on guard to-night!" The spirit of that order might have saved a large part of that dis heartening loss at Cherubusco. The valley of Anahuac, in which the city of Mexico is situ ated, is surrounded by high mountains on every 6ide. Between the peaks are deep gorges known as " cafiadas." To one of these we went, in 1874, to see the place where a few Mexicans used to meet on the Sabbath day to listen to the reading of the word of God. A copy of the Scriptures had come into their pos session, and they arranged to assemble to hear it read. The place selected was high up on the side of a mountain where a little cave was found. They dug a bank for seats on the sides, where twenty or thirty might sit, and in the center they built up with sods a little rest where the Bible could be laid, and a seat be hind it for the reader to occupy. Every thing had to be done with the greatest secrecy. They could not dare to approach or leave the place together, for their Jesuit enemies would soon have suspected and discovered their retreat. So, from various directions and one by one, they came to enjoy their oppor tunity. Every Sabbath this little company of Mexicans met together, and the Bible was then brought from its hiding- place and read and talked over, and then they would kneel down and pray, imploring God to give them grace faithfully to follow what they had learned, and entreating him to have mercy upon their country and hasten the hour when this holy book should be free and available to all in their benighted land. While here MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 95 in this favored country we were in the regular enjoyment of our luxury of the means of grace with " none to make us afraid," how little we could realize at what risk and under what diffi culties these honest souls, without any man to guide them, were seeking light and help from the divine oracles ! It was no ordinary privilege to visit such a place and try to realize how it looked with its worshipers only a few years before. Un doubtedly this was a sample of several such scenes over the country after the distribution of the Bible had taken place, and before the triumph of the republic had made it safe to let it be known that people were in possession of it or that they met to read or hear it read. After the departure of the Ameri can army in 1848 a raid was made by the clergy upon these holy books, and many of them were given up and destroyed by burning them publicly with indignities, especially in the cities; but yet many of them were never surrendered, and to-day some of those old and well-worn Bibles are seen and examined with a peculiar reverence. Thank Heaven, it is not the Bible- burners that have the upper hand in Mexico to-day! Their malignant power to hinder it is gone. It has at last "free course and is glorified " in all the land. Santa Anna's failure to free the country from the presence of the United States army greatly disappointed the nation and led to the formation of factions against him, so that he felt him self forced to resign his positions of president and commander- in-chief on the 1st of February, 1848, and on the 5th of April he sailed with his family for the island of Jamaica, where for nearly five years he found a quiet asylum. But we shall see him once more as a turbulent dictator ere his final exile is pronounced. The Mexican Congress declared General Herrera constitutional president, and the nation tried to recover from its terrible experience of war and its many miseries. 96 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. CHAPTER IV. Extending freedom in South America — Resisted by the pope— Liberalism dis tasteful to privilege — Duke of Richmond — Testimony of Curtis — Ecuador the papal model for Mexico — President Barrundia and the papal bull — Policy of Pius IX. — Constitutional freedom promised — Withdrawn — Flight of the pope to Gaeta — Roman republic — Papal appeal to Catholic powers to crush the Romans — Responded to by Louis Napoleon — Protest — Reaction and vengeance — "The Butcher of Bologna" — Gladstone — Sardinia — God within the shadow. This brings us to a period where we have to consider certain events transpiring in Europe which will be found to have a very intimate relation with those which have preceded and are yet to follow in Mexico — facts that proved more hostile to her aspirations for freedom than were the events now passed under review, sad as they were, bnt which nevertheless, in the mercy of God, contrary to their designed intent, were to help her forward. He who would properly comprehend the crisis in Mexico which we now approach must bear in mind that her sorrows were shared by others, and that they arose from identical causes. Her great transition did not stand alone, nor was it at all isolated, while on her struggle for constitutional freedom was probably suspended the future peace and welfare of this whole continent. This was specially true of Latin America, but also, and in a very serious sense, it was true of Anglo-Saxon America. All that both in the best estate longed for in their respective futures was involved in the Mexican struggle, and, under God, depended upon her success. If she were crushed they must have been involved sooner or later in the great catastrophe ; while, if she rose triumphant, the security of all the rest would be established. The States of Central and South America had, with one ex ception, enthusiastically proclaimed themselves converts to the MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 97 theory of constitutional freedom for all their people, which the Anglo-Saxon portion so grandly illustrates before them in its peace and prosperity, and were coming into possession of simi lar blessings for themselves. To gain this for their respective countries their bravest and best had given their treasure and their blood, and thousands of them had become martyrs in the glorious cause. But all this is hateful to the claims of political Romanism. That one little State of Ecuador is more to the pope's mind as to what the condition of a State should be than all the order, prosperity, and intelligence of the rest put together. Once, and only about seventy years ago, all of Central and South America were about as Ecuador is to-day, and the papacy was happy over their condition, so much so that no voice, with her sanction, was ever raised to call them to a better life of freedom or intelligence. On the contrary, Romanism did her best to rivet those chains and to proscribe and punish with dis abilities and even cruel deaths, as we have already seen, those who raised the flag of freedom, even when the ever^to-be-honored men who did this were some of her own clergy. In this regard (whatever she may say to the contrary occa sionally) Rome holds that the greatest of all offenders on this hemisphere against her will and preferences is the United States. If it were not for this land of ours her rule would have been undisturbed and unchallenged over all the rest, per haps for generations to come. We chose to be free, and at once began to talk about it quite loudly as a very good thing and desirable for every body else, and our neighbors heard and proceeded to examine our condition in order to judge for them selves, and were won by 'the teaching of our example. The pope and his curia are not at all in love with us and our meas ures, and their occasional compliments to our blessings must be taken with many grains of allowance, as their official utterances frequently evidence. It was bad enough for us to have a " free Church in a free State " for ourselves, but to '•' let our light so shine" that sixteen States should follow our example and cast their concordats away and declare for similar freedom — this 8 98 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. was outrageous. In fact, we are a great concern to the pope. Worse yet, we are using our prosperity not merely as an example of freedom and safe statehood, but we are also employing our resources to evangelize the natives of the earth with such vigor that our contributions for the spread of the Gospel are double what the pope collects from his whole denomination to extend his papal missions ! Hence his tears and lamentations and encycli cals bearing on the subject, and his fixed resolves to checkmate us by any means within his power. There were other elements also that entered into the struggle in regard to Mexico. The toryism of the English nation and her high churchism found our example distasteful, illustrating as it did the capability of enlightened men for self-government and the power of the Christian Church to sustain herself and her institutions without the crutches of State support. To peo ple who held to the " divine right of kings," and the theory of a national church establishment and such laws as those of pri mogeniture and entail, the United States was an unwelcome fact before the Mexican question was raised. No one can fully understand the story of the French intervention in Mexico and our relation to it if he does not comprehend how far these jealousies entered into the question as well as their sympathy for the Southern rebellion. There are facts that seem to intimate that a purpose has been long entertained by the monarchists of Europe to neutralize the influence and example of the United States, and, if possible, to overthrow our institutions. There are those who remember the language used by the Duke of Richmond, when Governor- General of Canada in 1819, to Mr. H. G. Gates, of Montreal, and by him faithfully reported afterward. Speaking of the government of the United States, the duke is reported to have said: It was weak, inconsistent, and bad, and could not long exist. It will be destroyed ; it ought not, and will not, be permitted to exist; for many and great are the evils that have originated from the existence of that government. The curse of the French Revolution and subsequent wars MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 99 and commotions in Europe are to be attributed to its example, and so long as it exists no prince will be safe upon his throne, and the sovereigns of Europe are aware of it, and they have been determined upon its de struction, and have come to an understanding upon this subject and have decided on the means to accomplish it ; and they will even finally succeed by subversion rather than conquest. The Church, of Rome has a design upon that country, and it will, in time, be the established religion and will aid in the destruction of that republic. I have conversed with many of the sovereigns and princes of Em-ope, particularly with George the Third and Louis the Eighteenth, and they have unanimously expressed these opinions relative to the government of the United States and their determination to subvert it.* Mr. Gates tells us that the duke then proceeded to show how this plan would be carried out. We were to be swamped by immigration ; these immigrants would in time become citizens, next they would get strong enough to hold the balance of power between the parties into which the nation was divided, and finally would gain the majority, when our institutions would be overthrown and the republic abolished. This is very like the testimony and warning of the illustrious Lafayette, who well knew the hostility of Romanism to republican governments, and declared it as his conviction to Prof. Morse and others that " if ever the liberties of the United States are destroyed it will be by Romish priests." f It is somewhat startling to pause and realize how the duke's anticipations seem in process of accom plishment, and especially remembering that immigration at that date was only about 11,000 per annum and the Romish popu lation in this country very small indeed. Now the former has risen into hundreds of thousands annually and the latter has climbed up to nearly 8,000,000. How amazed would this aristocrat become were he here to-day to see it, and how assured of the near approach to fulfillment of his anticipations ! Such men, however, leave out of their calculations the divine control in human affairs and that power which is working for right eousness in this world. The servants of God can be calm and confident, even with full knowledge of the wicked purposes of * Christian World, vol. vii, p. 132. \ Ibid., vol. vi, pp. 305, 359, 454. 100 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. their enemies, as they realize " The Lord is our defense ; and the Holy One of Israel is our King " (Psa. lxxxix, 18). The duke in his prophecy only represented the most unworthy element of his nation. America and American principles are better understood and appreciated by England than ever before. We have a hundred friends there to-day for the one that we had in his day, and so also of the wide world; grand men, too, in all ranks of life, who rejoice in our prosperity, and who feel all the stronger in view of the fact that they have such an ally as the United States to stand with them for constitutional freedom (whether monarchical or republican) and evangelical faith, speaking the same grand language, reading the same free Bible, ruled by the same just laws, laboring together to make this world better by the agency of evangelical religion. We can offset the prejudiced duke by one of his own order, the devout Earl of Shaftesbury, when he wrote to Dr. Baird, of New York, declaring, " The union of America with England in all these things of prime importance to the human race is of incalculable value. May God make us to be ever of one mind and one heart for his service and glory ! " All the States of Central and South America have broken away from the yoke of Spain or Portugal, one after another, following the cry for independence proclaimed by Hidalgo in 1811, and have declared for a republican form of government. Mexico became the key to the whole position ; she was nearest to us, and, as fast as able, copied our example. The others, bound largely by the medium of a common language, studied and imitated her. Their struggle with dictatorships has resulted in constitutional order more or less perfect. Their concor dats are abrogated, in many civil and religious liberty is pro claimed, monasteries and nunneries abolished and their proper ties secularized for the support of the State and education, the press made free, civil marriage laws passed, and altogether a new life of peace and prosperity has been entered upon under which some of these States have reached an era of order and social welfare which surprises those who visit their territories. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 101 Meanwhile Protestant missions have gone in to offer a purer faith and a Christian education to their youth. This has been accomplished by resolute men in the face of mighty opposition. From Rome came anathemas and excommunications, hurled at them in the name of Almighty God by a power that could not show its right to speak in his name. At home clerical des potism, with all the bitterness it dared to show, fought the new-born freedom, but the rising intelligence of the people saved the precious cause and brought it to its present state of advance. We select an illustrative instance here from a responsible source, one which will present the very latest aspects of the situation. The government of President Arthur selected a gentleman of known ability to proceed to Central and South America as commissioner and accredited agent of the United States, to examine and inquire thoroughly into the condition of the States of Spanish America and the prospects of trade and commerce with this country, and to furnish reliable information concerning the finances, trade, agriculture, politics, social con dition, and necessities of the several States. Mr. William E. Curtis was selected to fulfill this commission. A short time since he returned, and has given us a volume entitled Capitals of Spanish America, in which he has concentrated a mass of information, well arranged and illustrated, more complete than can be found in any other work. Mr. Curtis was evidently surprised and delighted to find such enlightened freedom and extending prosperity among these South American States. We present the condition of one State which he visited and found to be in such fearful contrast with all the rest, the lowest of the low, which had deliberately refused the boon that the others had so earnestly sought, and in the possession of which they are so glad and grateful. Yet the fact will show that this sad exception of Ecuador is one fixed exactly according to papal requirement, and just as political Romanism would have it arranged. As our readers study the description they will do well to bear in mind that here is shown the model after which 102 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. such desperate effort would have been made to mold the future of Mexico had the French intervention been successful. That all this miserable condition of things was intended and provided for by the papacy as their idea of what a State should be is evident in the terms of the treaty into which this very State entered, or rather to which its ultramontane President Moreno committed it, in April, 1863, when he negotiated that treaty with Cardinal Antonelli, the papal secretary of state. Three or four paragraphs will show its character as a sample of her preferences, and will equally show what Rome would have insisted on had she succeeded in Mexico, and would insist on every-where if she once gained her hoped-for ascendency in America. It was expressly stipulated in the case in the pope's name as follows : 1. The Roman Catholic and apostolic religion is the religion of the re public of Ecuador. Consequently the exercise of any other worship or the existence of any society condemned by the Church will not be permitted by the republic. » 2. The education of the young in all public and private schools shall be entirely conformed to the doctrines of the (Roman) Catholic religion. The teachers, the books, the instructions imparted, etc., etc., shall be sub mitted to the decision of the bishops. 3. Government will give its powerful patronage and its support to the bishops in their resistance to the evil designs of wicked persons, etc. 4. All matrimonial causes, and all those which concern the faith, the sacraments, the public morals, etc., are placed under the sole jurisdiction of the ecclesiastical tribunals, and the civil magistrates shall be charged to carry them into execution. 5. The privileges of churches (the ancient right of asylum in conse crated buildings) shall be fully respected. 6. Tithes shall be punctually paid, etc. The preceding extracts vindicate the deliberate judgment of Lord Palmerston, for so many years prime minister of En gland, and who had the widest opportunity to form an opinion of Romanism in this respect. He left us his conviction in the following language : All history tells us that wherever the Romish priesthood have gained a predominance there the utmost amount of intolerance is invariably theprac- MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 103 tice. In countries where they are in the minority they instantly demand not only toleration, but equality, but in countries where they predomi nate they allow neither toleration nor equality. But we need not now to go to foreigners to ascertain the real purposes contemplated by the papacy, not only in Mexico and South America, but in this, our own land, as well. The pope may not have intended this to be so plainly uttered just yet in a Protestant country, but as a sample of what is already avowed by Catholic writers, who jump so confidently to tlieir conclusions as to our prospective subjugation when they gain the power of numerical majority, and as an illustration of Lord Palmerston's words, take the following, which appeared some time since in the Rambler, a prominent Roman Catholic journal in our own land : You ask, If the Catholic were lord in the land, and you (Protestants) in the minority, what would he do with you ? That would depend upon circumstances. If it would benefit Catholicism he would tolerate you ; if expedient he would imprison you, banish you, fine you, possibly he might even hang you. But be assured of one thing, he would never tolerate you for the sake of the " glorious principles of civil and religious liberty." * Many Protestants suppose, as did the writer in other days, that, whatever might be the record of Romanism in the past, she must have been touched with the tolerant spirit of our age, and that it is a mistake to suppose she is really so false to free dom and so resolutely bent, whenever she gains the power of numbers, on renewing her intolerant course toward those who dissent from her teaching as these utterances of her public writers so often imply. Alas ! the language of her highest au thorities and her work as we see it here and in Mexico make it impossible longer to hold on to this judgment of charity con cerning her real intentions. We have no evidence that as a Church she is changed for the better or would show herself more tolerant and less cruel than she was in the days of old. Romanists can easily be found who favor tolerance, but they do not guide her policy, and could not 'restrain it if the hour * Christian World, vol. xiv, pp. 299, 301. 104 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. and the opportunity which she so much desires should again return to her. Now, what did Mr. Curtis find in Ecuador as a result of their concordat relations with Rome ? We quote a few sentences in reply : The rule which prevails every-where, that the less a people are under the control of that Church the greater their prosperity, enlightenment, and progress, is illustrated in Ecuador with striking force. One fourth of all the property in Ecuador belongs to the bishop. There is a Catholic church for every one hundred and fifty inhabitants ; of the population of the country ten per cent, are priests, monks, or nuns, and two hundred and seventy-two of the three hundred and sixty-five days of the year are ob served as feasts or fast days. The priests control the government in all its branches, dictate its laws and govern their enforcement, and rule the country as absolutely as if the pope were its king. There is not a railroad or stage-coach in the entire country, and until recently there was not a telegraph wire. Laborers get from two to ten dollars a month, and men are paid two dollars and a quar ter for carrying one hundred pounds of merchandise on their backs two hundred and eighty-five miles. There is not a wagon in the republic out side of Guayaquil (the port), and not a road over which a wagon could pass. The people know nothing but what the priests tell them ; they have no amusements but cock-fights and bull-fights, no literature, no mail routes except from Guayaquil to the capital (Quito). If one tenth of the money that has been expended in building monasteries had been devoted to the construction of cart-roads, Ecuador, which is naturally rich, would be one of the most wealthy nations, in proportion to its area, on the globe. Although Ecuador is set down in the geographies as a republic, it is simply a popish colony, and the power of the Vatican is nowhere felt so completely as there. ... So subordinated is the State to the Church that the latter elects the president, the Congress, and the judges. A crucifix sits in the audience chamber of the president and on the desk of the pre siding officer of Congress. All the schools are controlled by the Church, and the children know more about the lives of the saints than about the geography of their own country. There is not even a good map of Ecua dor. . . . The social and political condition of Ecuador presents a pict ure of the Dark Ages. There is not a newspaper printed outside of the city of Guayaquil, and the only information the people have of what is going on in the world is gained from strangers who now and then visit the country, and a class of peddlers who make periodical trips, traversing the whole hemisphere from Guatemala to Patagonia. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 105 The ceremony of marriage is not observed to any great extent, for the expense of matrimony is too heavy for the common people to think of paying it. For this the Catholic Church is responsible, and to it can be traced the cause of the illegitimacy of more than half of the population. One fourth of the city of Quito is covered with convents, and every fourth person you meet is a priest or a monk or a nun. Until the influence of the Romish Church is destroyed, until immigra tion is invited and secured, Ecuador will be a desert rich in undeveloped resources. Witli plenty of natural wealth, it has neither peace nor in dustry, and such a thing as a surplus of any character is unknown. One of the richest of the South American republics and the oldest of them all, it is the poorest and most backward.* How there could be found people who deliberately prefer this condition of things seems impossible to comprehend. Yet the beneficent changes wrought in other States alarmed the papacy and aroused its determination to force back these States into the condition of Ecuador. For this purpose the French Intervention was attempted in Mexico, to extinguish, if pos sible, constitutional freedom and evangelical Christianity upon this continent. Every step toward progress which these now free States made has been fought by the pope. Evidence of this is abundant. We need only quote one as a sample, the case of New Granada. There lies before us the allocution of the pope against that State, dated 27th of September, 1852. Being nearly nine pages long we have room only for the doings which he denounces and his attempted abrogation of them and his threats of punishment. The translation is from the Tablet, the Irish Roman Catholic journal. His " holiness " first enumerates the chief actions of the government and legislature of New Granada, which he denounces. They are as follows : 1. The expulsion of the Jesuits and the breaking up of the other or ders. 2. The encouragement given to those who had taken the monastic vows to break them and return to the ordinary manner of life. 3. The giving of the appointment of parish priests and the regulation of their salaries to the people of each parish, convened in public meeting. 4. The interference of the government in the question of the revenues of the * Capitals of South America, by W. E. Curtis, p. 306. 106 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. archbishop and bishops. 5. The introduction of " free education." 6. The liberty given to all to print and publish their opinions on the subject of religion. 7. And finally the liberty granted to immigrants and to any one else to profess privately and publicly whatever worship they please. And this is all to make him, as he declares, "heavily op pressed," and cause him " bitter grief." How does he meet the situation ? He states that since 1845 he has been complaining and remonstrating with that legislature and government " against these unjust laws " and " nefarious decrees," and had backed up the bishops in their resistance to them ; and he condemns the clergy who were willing to accept and obey them, and denounces the proposal of the president " to give our legate his conge when he did not neglect to protest in our name against all those wicked and sacrilegious attempts." Then he comes to his denunciation : We do censure, condemn, and declare utterly null and void all the afore said decrees, which have, so much to the contempt of the ecclesiastical authority and of this holy see, been there enacted by the civil power. He then adds his threat and closes : We very gravely admonish all those by whose instrumentality and orders they were put forth that they seriously consider the penalties and censures which have been constituted by the apostolical constitutions and the sacred canons of councils against those who violate and profane sacred persons and things and the ecclesiastical power and the right of this apos tolic see.* The legislature and government of New Granada were un moved by this bitter blast from Rome, and paid it no more at tention than the idle wind which passed by them. The presi dent and public men of the State of Honduras were not quite so patient, when about the same time the pope and his secretary of state, Antonelli, tried the same course with them, and on their refusal to be moved one iota from the liberal constitution which they had framed and were following the pope excommunicated the president. When the bull of excommunication arrived the president called a mass-meeting in the public square to hear it * Christian World, vol. iv, pp. 55-63. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 107 read. He had a company of artillery and a cannon placed in front of the crowd, with the muzzle pointed toward Rome and loaded with blank cartridge. When all was ready President Barrundia, standing beside the gun and facing the dignitaries of state, civil and military, drew forth and read aloud every word of the bull. Then, carefully folding it, he placed it in the cannon, had it rammed home, and gave the signal to send it back to Rome ! * This was the very spirit of Martin Luther when he burned the pope's bull at Wittenberg. The free and enlightened world applauds the courageous act of the great re former, as the freemen of South America to-day do that of Barrundia. One of the leading editors of the State struck the key-note of their freedom when, in view of these transactions, he wrote : We are Catholics and partisans of the absolute emancipation of the Church, because religion is all conscience and needs nothing from force. Its seat is in the heart. What religion needs is what every thing needs — liberty, not in licentiousness, but in justice. When will Rome learn this simple lesson and give up her f oolish attempts to override the conscience of mankind ? This is the power whose workings we have to watch with sleepless vigilance as the price of liberty for ourselves and for others — a power unscrupulous, unchanging, and centralized, wielding the false assumption of a divine authority and demand ing the absolute subjection of all to its despotic will ; its center the Roman curia, its secret police the Jesuits, its army of oper ations the bishops and priests, sworn to implicit obedience to all its behests, no matter how unpatriotic, illiberal, or unscriptu- ral they may be. Not satisfied with his despotic rule over his own denomination, Pius IX. set his heart upon extending that rule over all the other Churches. He asserted that he was the vicegerent of God upon this earth, without warrant for the claim ; still he attempted to force that claim on Mexico, thereby causing the most agonizing conflict of her history. What made this all the more difficult to endure was the fact that he made * Christian World, vol. v, p. 307. 108 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. the world believe, for a few weeks at the beginning of his reign, that the spirit of the nineteenth century had reached the Ro man curia, and that their war against modern civilization was to cease. The liberal cabinet selected by Pius IX. framed a statuto (constitution), which was promised in the pope's name in 1847. The liberal world was taken by storm, men threw up their hats and cheered for " the reforming pope ! " "A con federated Christendom " was talked of, with Pius IX. at the head, and universal liberty safe under its protection. Crowded public meetings were held in the cities of our land ; one such, on the 29th of November, 1847, in the Broadway Tabernacle, with the mayor of New York in the chair, while the leading men present exulted in " the movement which had placed the head of the most venerable Church in Western Christendom at the front of the great liberal movement in the whole world ! " Horace Greeley made one of the addresses, and moved six enthusiastic resolutions, the last of which we here quote : Resolved, That "peace hath her victories, no less renowned than war," and that the noble attitude of Pius IX., throwing the vast influence of the pontificate into the scale of well-attempted freedom, standing as the ad vocate of peaceful progress, the prompter of social amelioration, industrial development, and political reform, . . . is the grandest spectacle of our day, full of encouragement and promise to Europe, more grateful to us, and more ' glorious to himself, than triumphs on a hundred battle-fields ! * Mexico doubtless rejoiced as she heard their jubilations, and supposed her long conflict was ended — that freedom's bright day under the highest religious sanction had dawned at last for her. She could not then have for a moment anticipated a French Intervention and a cruel war, forced upon her within sixteen years, sanctioned by the man who at that moment was raising such hopes of freedom. Poor Greeley, too ! How little he could imagine in that hour that twenty years after he would stand again on that same plat form to utter his disappointment at the failure of the hopes he then expressed, to indignantly denounce those who had proved * Christian World, vol. xxii, p. 92. POPE PICS IX., Who sanctioned and sustained the usurpation of Maximilian. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 109 so false to their pledges of freedom, and to give his sympathy to a real liberty in Italy under the constitutional rule of Victor Emmanuel when the pope's temporal power was in the dust ! This purposed freedom in Rome, under pontifical patronage, was destined to an imperfect development and a short life. It is amusing to read the " faint praise " with which the experi ment was greeted by Roman Catholic writers, like Maguire, in his Rome ; Its Rulers and its Institutions. As we follow him for a little we see that it did not put him into any intoxication of delight, like that exhibited by the advocates of liberty who be lieved the papacy sincere in its reforming course. Unfortunately for himself, the pope had raised hopes of constitutional freedom in the minds of the liberal party in Italy, but when the constitu tion, after long delay, appeared it did not give satisfaction. The press of Rome and the liberal leaders began to realize that they were trifled with. The Romans, army and people, resolved not to be cheated out of their right to a liberal constitution, and held Pius IX. to his promises. Their determination was such that the Pope chose to regard himself as in danger for his liberty, if notfor his life — an insinuation which they indignantly re pelled. Instead of conciliating, he made np his mind to desert them, and thus, he thought, to throw all things into confusion. This was carried into effect on the night of November 24, 1847. Count Spaur, the Bavarian minister, and his wife had their car riage at the palace of the Quirinal, where the pope, disguised in a suit of livery, took his seat on the box beside the coachman, and thus the head of the Catholic world, under the hat of a lackey, rolled away from his palace. They rode all night to Gaeta, where, under the wing of the King of Naples, he was pro tected during the seventeen months of his absence from Rome. For this secret flight there was no necessity. He had only to keep his promises to his people to win their loving gratitude ; but, having decided to disappoint their hopes, and by appealing to the Catholic powers to restore him to his throne by force of arms in case the Romans did not invite his return on his own 110 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. terms, he could provide for the punishment of the patriotic leaders of the Roman people, who were so obnoxious to him, as well as secure a foreign garrison to keep the people in subjec tion in the future. The flight of Pius IX. was welcome news to the Romans, who proceeded at once to organize a constitutional assembly. They closed the Inquisition, re-organized the police, provided educational facilities and other beneficent measures that were greatly needed. A most respectful appeal was made to the pontiff to return and resume his spiritual functions, assuring him of their loyalty to him as the head of the Church, asking only that be recognize the civil liberties which they had estab lished and had determined to maintain. They would concede complete liberty of action in religious matters, and so end peace ably the long contention. But this proposition from the people was indignantly spurned by the pope. Nothing but their abso lute submission to the former state of things would satisfy him. Instead of' conciliating those whom he professed so much to love, like the " gentle lamb " and " mild dove," as Maguire calls him, he issued an appeal, couched in the harshest language, addressed to the great Catholic powers, demanding their armed assistance to crush his people and their chosen government, to re-instate him on his throne, and to sustain him there. This is the clos ing sentence of the appeal : Since Austria, France, Spain, and the kingdom of the Two Sicilies are, by their geographical position, in a situation to be able efficaciously to concur by their armies in re-establishing in the holy see the order which has been destroyed by a band of sectarians, the holy father, relying on the religious feeling of those powerful children of the Church, demands with full confidence their armed intervention to deliver the States of the Church from this band of wretches who by every sort of crime have prac ticed the most atrocious despotism.* Louis Napoleon, anxious to bid largely for the support of the priesthood in France, and jealous of the rival power of Austria, regarded up to that time as " the pope's broad shield," promptly * Rome : Its Rulers and its Institutions, by T. J. Maguire, M.P., p. 116. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. Ill sent a force of forty thousand men, that after a struggle of two months overcame the heroic defenders of Rome. The Austrian troops meanwhile stamped out all patriotic resist ance in northern Italy. The pope may be said to have walked over the mutilated bodies of his subjects to his throne. The survivors published to the world a protest that in vigor of lan guage exceeds any thing ever addressed to any pontiff. This document was prepared by the " Circolo Populare " (the People's Club). It was issued a short time before the city of Rome fell into the hands of Louis Napoleon, and had the widest circulation among the people. In it is expressed with dignity and sincerity an exalted knowledge of justice and right and true religion. We have room for only a few of its vigorous sentences. They thus address Pius IX. : You say that you have received from God, the Author of peace and charity, the mission to love with parental affection all people and all nations, and to procure for them, as far as lies in you, protection and safety, and not to urge them on to slaughter and death. False words! for they are belied by the solemn fact, confessed by yourself, of your hav ing called against us, and urged on to fratricidal war, Austria, France, Spain, and part of Italy. Who has caused the slaughter at Bologna and Ancona, and the carnage under the walls of Rome? You were adverse to that war which brave citizens fought for the safety of Italy ; but O, you are not averse to this one, carried on by vile men for the purpose of replacing you, the most abhorred of sovereigns, on the throne which you deserted, and from which, by the inscrutable decree of divine Providence, rather than by act of ours, you have been deposed ! Whose blood waters our land? Whose carcasses cover our fields ? Unworthy pontiff ! This blood cries for vengeance before the throne of God, and those souls will bring down on you the judgment of the Most High ! . . . Who can for give you your perversions of facts and outrages on persons? Language has not words more black and disdainful than those you employ against us, whose crime is that of having despoiled you of your earthly sovereignty after having exhorted you, in a thousand ways, to carry out true reforms, stable, and such as our wants demanded. It is not the word " republic " we are in love with, but we want a wise, provident, and just government. Now this, callit what you will, is what we have always wanted, and we have a right to it. To this point we tried to urge you, from which the government of the popes had so far receded. 112 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. Vindicating their claim to be called Bible Christians, and not " infidels," as he called them for opposing his temporal power, they continue : We hold the religion of Christ dear, because we believe it to be true, saving, and holy. But this religion, which is none other than faith in Christ, by which we are justified before God, and forgiven all sins, can well exist without bishops and priests. This religion of faith, professed by many persons in all parts of the world, constitutes that invisible Church of believers which is universal, whose Head and Pontiff and Priest is, and can only be, Jesus Christ. . . . When you left Rome the Bible entered it. The Bible so long perse cuted by the popes, both the Gospel of Christ and the holy letters of the apostles faithfully translated into Italian, are now in the hands of the people, who read them, and there they find neither popery nor pope. . . . O, senseless we! That we should ever have believed you, ever ap plauded your feigned promises and ephemeral concessions, to find ourselves now deluded in our hopes and cheated of our happiness! If you appeal to the religion of the canons, we stand by the holy religion of the Gospel; you belie it ; we are faithful to God and to his Christ. Yes, we believe in the Chkist op God, and our faith daily increases in comparing his doc trine with your practice. The more we disbelieve you, the more are we led to see that we ought to believe him. He is the free Saviour of his people, you an oppressor and destroyer. You, who alone might have saved our country and redeemed it from its lost condition, have joined yourself to her enemies to condemn and destroy her.* These are not the words of " blasphemers of God and relig ion," nor of " anarchists," nor " red republicans," nor of " de mons let loose from hell," as Pius IX. so cruelly and unjustly called them. They were merchants, teachers, business men of intelligence, trusted by those below them in the social scale, whose violence they restrained. This indignant protest of the heroic defenders of freedom called the attention of the civilized world to the awful venge ance dealt out to the patriots on the restoration of the papal power. When government expostulations had been tried in vain, several public men went to Italy to investigate the truth * Christian World, vol. i, pp. 12-17. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 113 of these reports. From England, among others, went the Hon. W. E. Gladstone and Rev. William Arthur. Their letters and books show what they found. Mr. Maguire fights very shy of the terrible vengeance taken on the republicans by the government of the pope and the other potentates of Italy on their restoration. He sneers at English opinion, and especially at Mr. Gladstone for aiding to form that opinion, as to the cruelties practiced by the Italian despots in 1849. He assures us that all this is the unwarranted exaggerations of the liberal party, and states that it cannot be true, because " his holiness Pius IX. was as gentle as a lamb and as mild as a dove " (p. 412), and even dares to add that " the King of Naples was one of the most foully libeled of living men." This Romish way of writing history is worthy of Jesuitism itself. The facts form one of the saddest chapters of the modern history of Europe, and received at the time the attention of many competent witnesses. Mr. Arthur gives his authorities for the dreadful facts he pre sents in his work, The Modern Jove. We quote one or two paragraphs : Under guise of an amnesty the pope excluded from political pardon members of the assembly, general officers, and a multitude besides, and applied the rule with such rigor that among his subjects the word " amnesty " became another name for death, prison, and exile. No sooner did the French authorities see what cruelties were meditated by the ecclesiastics than they tried to prevent them, but in vain. The Austrians, who held the northern part of his States, were at first and in general ready instruments of the priestly excesses, but even they some times turned upon their employers. Gennarelli, in his sad little book, I Lutti dello Stato Romano, quotes a case of an Austrian officer who, with his battalion of Croats, had to protect executioners from popular fury, and said that had he to serve such a government, he would tear off his uniform and break his sword. In the town of Bologna alone, during the years of restored papal authority, one hundred and eighty-six persons were shot. And as to Faenza and Imola, Gennarelli cites a document in which the government alleges a case where no less than eighty were shot after a single trial, while ten more were sent to the galleys, and thirteen to prison. (P. 108.) 9 114 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. The wonder is that enough to continue the struggle for lib erty were left when this savage process had ceased ; and the fact that there were, and to win it, too, shows, as it did in Mexico, how universally and sincerely the people had resolved to be free. God alone knows the price they had to pay in either land to win their freedom. It would be hard to find a patriot people whose heroic endurance of exile, scaffold, and dungeon more appropriately suggests Lowell's lines : ' ' Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne. Yet that scaffold sways the future, And behind the dim unknown Standeth God, within the shadow, Keeping watch above his own." One of the most unscrupulous of the officials of the papacy, in carrying out the persecutions and massacres of the defeated liberals, was Monseigneur Bidini, apostolic nuncio. So atrocious was this man's thirst for vengeance that he has been since known and hated through Italy as " the Butcher of Bologna." In view of the character for ferocity which he had acquired there were few governments in Europe that were willing to have him made the medium of communication with them. Yet only two years after these events, and while his cruel noto riety was still so fresh, this was the person chosen by the pope to be sent to America to perform some mission in this country, and then to go to Mexico and Brazil. This seemed to be a studied insult, in complete disregard of our views, for which there could be no excuse. President Polk, in 1847, when send ing our first charge d'affaires to Rome, had requested the pon tifical court, in the event of their sending any diplomatic agent to this country, to send always a layman, not an ecclesiastic — the same thing that the Duke of Wellington had insisted upon before, when it was proposed that England should send an embassador to Rome. Notwithstanding this distinct notifica tion Pius IX. deliberately disregarded the request of our gov ernment, and not only selected an ecclesiastic, but one whose MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 115 hands were stained with the blood of the martyrs of Italian lib erty, this Archbishop Bidini, as their chosen emissary to this republic. Father Gavazzi was here when this ill-omened messenger ar rived, and publicly denounced him in one of his lectures. The exiled Italian patriots then in New York heard of his land ing, and called a public meeting, where they denounced him from their personal knowledge of his cruel acts against their countrymen, and exhibited his infamous character before the American people. His clerical friends were led to fear for his life, so they kept his whereabouts as secret as possible, and when the hour for his departure arrived he was taken on a tug boat down the Hudson to the ship without passing through the city, and so escaped the vengeance of his countrymen. He had previously been burned in effigy in Cincinnati, Baltimore, and other cities, and his cruelties exposed in many of the leading papers. In the sorrowful period which now ensued in Italy only one of her sovereigns paid the slightest regard to the constitutions and promises of freedom granted in 1848. The others de stroyed their constitutions, resumed their despotic rule, opened the dungeons of the Inquisition, and the cause of freedom soon seemed dead in Italy. The grand exception was Charles Albert, King of Sardinia, who, faithful among the faithless, became the star of hope amid the darkness. Still, what could he do against the despotism of the other six rulers, and the Legion of France upholding the power of the pope? God raised up to help him one of the grandest of men, Count Camillo di Cavour, a man who had traveled and studied the institutions of self-governing countries till the freedom of his native land became his absorb ing passion. He believed it was possible to liberate and unite the Italian people. The brave little kingdom of Sardinia had only four millions of subjects, while the reactionary powers had twenty millions, but it began its march of progress by granting liberty to its inhabitants and religious freedom to the Waldenses, who were reduced to about twenty-five thousand souls by the 116 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. persecutions that had wasted them for the past six hundred years. Their gratitude to this constitutional king was unbounded, and a legion of them was raised that faithfully served in the final struggle for the unity of Italy. They bore on their banners the inscription "The grateful Waldenses to Charles Albert." The fearful "shadow" over them had been lifted. All through the past two hundred and fifty years the prayer of John Milton, Oliver Cromwell's great secretary, had been in the heart of evangelical Christendom for them. The reader will remem ber how the sonl of Cromwell was stirred to indignation by the accounts of what these people were enduring from the cruelty of Rome and its allies, and how he interposed for their relief, and wrote to the Protestant governments of Europe, asking them to join in their defense. But Protestantism was then weak, and power was on the side of the oppressors, and little could be done. At that hour Milton wrote his immortal prayer : "Avenge, O, Lord, thy slaughtered saints, whose bones Lie scattered on the Alpine mountains cold ; Even them who kept thy truth so pure of old, When all our fathers worshiped stocks and stones. Forget not ; in thy book record their groans, Who were thy sheep, and in their ancient fold, Slain by the bloody Piedmontese, that rolled Mother with infant down the rocks. Their moans The vales redoubled to the hills, and they To heaven. Their martyred blood and ashes sow O'er all the Italian fields-where still doth sway The triple tyrant; that from these may grow An hundred-fold, who, having learned thy way Early, may fly the Babylonian woe." The " bloody Piedmontese " whom he thus so justly character ized were the cruel Duke of Savoy and his troops, urged on to this awful work by Pope Paul IV., and also Francis I., sovereign of France, who ordered his soldiers to " extirpate the Waldenses without mercy." How wonderful to note now who became the agents of the Lord's predicted mercy for these people ! First, MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 117 the Duke of Savoy's descendant, Charles Albert, and then a suc cessor of Francis I. on the throne of France, Napoleon III., was providentially constrained, by a way that he knew not, and did not choose, to close the temporal sovereignty of the pontiff, and to consent that the " States of the Church " should be added to complete Italy's unity ! Now the Waldenses worship in Rome, right in view of the Vatican ! Milton's prayer has been glo riously answered, to the permanent peace and benefit of all con cerned. The papacy still keeps up a tirade against modern civilization and its progress in the hope that the emancipated nations will some_day regret their freedom and unite to crush the constitutional security of its former subjects and restore its misrule. Truly this illusion is unique and wonderful ! We have thus passed briefly in review for the better under standing of our main subject the antecedent and contemporary facts by which the events in Mexico are to be understood. No unusual thing, in this sense, was happening to her ; she was only suffering from the conspiracy against freedom which had long afflicted the world on the other side of the Atlantic. If she had been able to take a comprehensive view of what was trans piring in Europe, her hope of a blessed solution of her own trials would have been greatly strengthened. The Roman hierarchy, indignant at the losses which constitu tional struggles in Europe had caused, in desperation deter mined to make good its losses in the New World. To this end all its great resources were ready, and the plans were to be carried out regardless of public opinion or will. Here, then, we find the source of Mexico's latest struggle and recognize those with whom she had to deal. 118 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. CHAPTER V. Desperate efforts of the Mexican clericals — Merits of the conflict — Coup d'etat of the church party — Terrorizing policy of Miramon — Violation of British em bassy — Republican victories — Benito Juarez, Mexico's "Washington," and his aids — Perfidy of Louis Napoleon — Intervention — Co-operation of the pope — " Laws of reform " — Tripartite treaty — Jecker bonds — De Moray — Collapse of Jecker — " Cinco de Mayo " — Maximilian's call and warning. Santa Anna was recalled in 1853 and appointed president " for one year, until a constitutional Congress could be convened and the future provided for." It soon became evident that the years of his exile had not been employed in learning lessons friendly to popular government or his country's peace under republican forms. The record of the past might have saved the Mexican patriots from the error of supposing that this " leopard " could change his characteristic " spots." In the twenty years that had passed since his first inauguration as pres ident he had become as despotic as he had then sworn to be constitutional. Hardly was he seated in the presidential chair when he began to develop his real character. He proceeded to overthrow the federal republic, and announced himself on December 16, 1853, as permanent dictator, and assumed the title of " Serene High ness," with power to name his successor ! He recalled the Jesuits, whom the nation had previously expelled, knowing that they would work out zealously his projects for the church faction, and finished his desperate course by the crime against the Constitution of investing, on July 1, 1854, Jose Gutierrez de Estrada with powers " to negotiate iii Europe for the es tablishment of a monarchy in Mexico," and this without any authorization from the nation ! This Senor Estrada, as the agent of the church party, was not new to such business. It MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 119 was he who in October, 1840, issued a pamphlet in Mexico ad vocating the overthrow of the republican institutions and the establishment of a Mexican monarchy. Madame Calderon tells us of the excitement caused by this production. Estrada was compelled to exile himself to escape the vengeance of the gov ernment. But he still proved true to his clerical affiliations, and ten years after this authorization by Santa Anna we find him heading the deputation which waited on Maximilian at Miramar, to offer him an imperial crown in Mexico.* Santa Anna brought about his own overthrow by one more despotic step in abolishing the Institute of Sciences in Oaxaca because of its liberal principles, and was compelled to fly, in August, 1855, to Cuba, and later to St. Thomas. He was tried once again for high treason, sentenced to be hanged, and his property confiscated. President Juarez afterward commuted the sentence to banishment for eight years. This was the end of his power, but not of his disturbing presence in Mexico. We shall hear from him again, in an aspect of deception which illus trated still more fully the vileness of his character. The overthrow of Santa Anna carried down once more the un scrupulous church party and swept away the plan of Tacubaya, under which they acted. Estrada was not able to bring his royal prince to aid in time, and the nation was aroused to a sense of this new conspiracy against its freedom. These various "plans" were found to contain one fatal defect which the grow ing liberty party now resolved to remedy. This was the attempt to build a free State without its foundation-stone. All the con stitutions framed under the various " plans " retained the papal concordat as an item of the social compact. From 1822 to this time (1854) this excluded religious liberty. The highest of all liberty being denied, the remainder was not worth dying for. At last the true republican idea was embraced, the concordat abolished, and religious freedom was to be incorporated into a constitution under which the nation should find permanent peace. * Mexico and the United States, p. 2 7 6. The Fall of Maximilian's Empire, Schroeder. 120 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. General Alvarez, a true patriot, but aged and infirm, was elected president, and called Benito Juarez to his cabinet as secretary for the departments of justice, ecclesiastical affairs, and public instruction. Soon afterward there was issued a proclamation for the election of delegates to a national Con gress, " for the purpose of reconstructing the nation under the form of a popular representative democratic republic." On the 22d of November, 1855, the celebrated law for the admin istration of justice, known as the "Law of Juarez," was pro claimed. This grand law abolished the whole sj'stem of class legislation, and was deeply resented by the clerical party. The Congress devoted a whole year to the task of framing a Consti tution based on this law, and on the 3d of February, 1857, it " issued in the name of God, and by the authority of the Mexi can people," the magnificent Constitution of which Mr. Seward said that he regarded it as the best instrument of its kind in the world. It may be found in Abbot's Mexico and the United States, p. 283. President Alvarez having been obliged to resign on account of increasing infirmities, General Comonfort was elected to the office. The implacable and still powerful church party pro nounced against the Constitution. We present the leading prin ciples of each of the parties in question, so that what they were fighting for may be made clear to the reader. The clerical platform was as follows : SYNOPSIS OP THE PLAN OF TACUBAYA PROCLAIMED BY ZULOAGA. 1. The inviolability of all church property and church revenues and the re-establishment of former exactions. 2. The re-establishment of the fueros, or special rights of the church and of the army. (Under these fueros the military and clergy were responsible only to their own tribunals, and not to the law of the land.) 3. The restoration of the Roman Catholic religion as the sole and exclu sive religion of Mexico. 4. The censorship of the press. 5. The exclusive system with regard to foreign immigration, confining it solely to immigrants from Catholic countries. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 121 6. The overthrow of the Constitution of 1857, and the establishment of an irresponsible central dictatorship, subservient solely to the Church. 7. If possible, the restoration of a monarchy in Mexico, or the estab lishment of a European protectorate. In contradistinction to this was the platform of the Repub lican party, as follows : SYNOPSIS OF THE LIBERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1857. 1. The establishment of a constitutional federal government in the place of a military dictatorship. 2. Freedom and protection to slaves that enter the national territory. 3. Freedom of religion. i. Freedom of the press. ' 5. The nationalization of the $200, 000, 000 of property held by the clergy, from which, and other sources, the Church derives an annual income of not less than $20, 000, 000. * 6. The subordination of the army to the civil power and the abolition of military and ecclesiastical fueros, or special tribunals. 7. The negotiation of commercial treaties of the fullest scope and liberal character, including reciprocity of trade on our frontiers. 8. The colonization of Mexico by the full opening of every part of the country to immigration, and the encouragement of foreign enterprise in every branch of industry, particularly in mining and in works of internal improvement.* The resources of wealth wielded by the church party were yet too strong for freedom, and Comonfort was compelled to retire in 1858. However, Juarez was soon elected to the presidency. Before he could assume the reins of government the clericals, led by the papal nuncio, Clementi, called the " Junta de Notables " (an aristocratic council of twenty-eight persons of their own choice), and sustained by a small body of the military, annulled the grand Constitution over which the whole country was re joicing and proclaimed the plan of Tacubaya in its stead. They elected Zuloaga as their president, while the constitu tional president was compelled to leave the capital and carry on his government at Guanajuato or Vera Cruz, protected by the loyal portion of the army, and being recognized and sus- * Mexico in 1861-62, by Dr. C. Lempriere, p. 37. London, 1862. 122 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. tained by all the States of the Mexican Union save two, which were under the control of the clerical troops. Though this clerical government held only the cities of Mexico and Puebla and the country immediately surrounding them, they managed by tlieir large financial resources to hold their position for three years. How the usurpation was accomplished and how it retained its hold of the capital for such a length of time needs explanations. Of all the despotic acts of the clerical party this was the most daring. Four men were chiefly used for the pur pose, Gabriac, who represented France, Senor del Barrio, the Guatemalan minister, Senor Pacheco, from Spain, and Louis Clementi, the nuncio of the pope. The latter was the ruling spirit and inspired the others with the idea that it was the will of the pope, and of Almighty God through him, and was their positive duty, to render tlieir service to the pontiff and the cause of religion. So firm was the stand which they took, though concealing the religious motive as well as they could, that the other foreign ministers stupidly allowed themselves to be led to recognize the usurpation of Zuloaga. This prolonged the situation, which otherwise could only have lasted for a few months. The clericals improved the opportunity to send em bassadors to foreign courts, Almonte, the most detested of their agents, being sent as representative to the French court, where he was soon to plan, with Napoleon, so much suffering for his native land. These agents represented only a pronun ciamento of traitors, not the lawfnl government of Mexico. President Juarez meanwhile issued protests against the legiti macy of their actions, the nation became thoroughly aroused, while the facts began to find their way to foreign governments, so that one after another the embassadors of England, Prussia, and the United States were ordered away from the capital, and appeared at Vera Cruz to recognize President Juarez, our own representative, Mr. McLane, being the first to do so. The downfall of these traitors was approaching. The Re publican army, ably led by such generals as Ortega and Uruaga, was augmenting and increasingly victorious. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 123 The clericals were not long in discovering that Zuloaga was not exactly the man to do their work. Their purposes required an instrument with less conscience and more despotism. Zu loaga was displaced and General Miguel Miramon was named by the junta as their president, on January 31, 1859. The character of this new instrument of papal power, as well as of Marquez, whom he made commander-in-chief, was eminently worthy of the party which sanctioned and approved of their conduct, both then and some years later, under Maximilian, when they repeated, only on a larger scale, these same outrages on the laws of war and of common humanity. In illustration of this we here quote an order of Miramon to the general-in-chief, issued after the battle of Tacubaya (in which the Republican troops were victorious), when the church president resolved that he would terrorize Mexico by authorizing assassination of all those who would lift their hands to help her into the posses sion of constitutional freedom : Mexico, April 11, 1861. In the afternoon of to-day and under your excellency's most strict responsibility, your excellency will give the order for all the prisoners holding the grade of officers and chiefs to be shot, informing me of the number which have fallen under this lot. Miramon. Marquez at once followed this out by a proclamation to the nation itself, as follows : LEONARDO MARQUEZ TO THE PEOPLE OF MEXICO. Know ye, that in virtue of the faculties with which I am invested, I have resolved to publish the following decree : 1. Benito Juarez, and all who have obeyed him or recognized his gov ernment, are traitors to their country, as well as all who have aided him by any means, secretly or indirectly, no matter how insignificantly. 2. All persons coming under the heads of the preceding article shall be shot immediately on their apprehension, without further investigation than the identification of their persons. Marquez.* This atrocious attempt to terrorize a whole people into obe dience to a body of despots is the most awful fact up to this * Mexico in 1861-62, by C. Lempriere, p. 127. 124 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. date in Mexican history. The clericals knew that the masses of the people were overwhelmingly against them, yet they author ized these two men to work out their will, becoming guilty of the blood of their countrymen in order to serve those who pro fessed to be ministers of God ! Nor was this all of which this pair of traitors proved themselves to be capable. At the close of 1860 there was in deposit in the British Legation in the city of Mexico the sum of $660,000, which President Juarez had paid in on account of the English bond-holders' debt. It was under the seal of the British embassador, who was then absent. Miramon and Marquez, who were on the eve of being thrust from the capital by the advancing Republican army, forcibly entered the legation, broke the seals, and carried off the money. The British government exonerated the government of Juarez and the Mexican people from blame for the outrage, but Mexico had to pay the amount over again notwithstanding. There was one government, however, which was in no haste to be undeceived, and which had ulterior ends to be served. This vile Miramon faction had negotiated a treaty through its agent at Paris, Juan N. Almonte, which conferred advantages and recognized claims before refused by every liberal govern ment of Mexico, and this to a very large amount. The consti tutional government protested against this Almonte treaty as " unjust in its essence, foreign to the usage of nations in the principles it established, illegal in the manner in which it was negotiated, and contrary to the rights of the country." But it furnished Napoleon III. with just such a weapon as he wanted, and he gladly took its infamous author under his special pro tection and resolved on a war whose injustice will be recognized as long as modern history is studied by honest men, and can never be forgotten by Mexico. As to how matters seemed to strike an intelligent stranger visiting the country at the time, we may quote a sentence from the work of Dr. Lempriere, fellow of St. John's Col lege, Oxford, whose indignation was aroused to find that his own government was so completely deceived by the artful MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 125 policy of the cabal then holding the city of Mexico. He writes thus : And yet at present England seems moving as the tool of such an unmiti gated scoundrel as Miramon — a man whom, if there existed an extradition treaty, we should have insisted on being hung; Gabriac (the ultramontane French representative), the fosterer of this man's murderous rule, and Pacheco, both of whom have been hooted out of the country with well- merited and universal execration. These are the men who are moving the strings at Paris, with Almonte their able embassador. The clergy of France are in accord with their distressed and exiled brethren; but who can explain the action of England? [He means in recognizing such a usurpation as the true government of Mexico.] We are aiding a power and establishing a religious dominion which is abhorrent to the mind of every honest Englishman.* He adds this note on Gabriac : \ In the papers of the Archbishop of Mexico (captured by the Liberals) was found a recommendation of this man to the prayers and favor of the pope for the valuable services he had rendered the clerical party in the revolu tion of Mexico, and the recognition of Miramon, their champion. Another proof of the papacy being the life and soul of these reactionary measures against popular freedom, as much so as it had been against those of Italy and other lands already liberated from its despotism. During Miramon's absence at the head of his army the de moralization in the city of Mexico was such that a document was drawn up and signed by the members of the diplomatic corps still remaining at the capital, with the exception of the Guatemalan minister and the nuncio, declaring that " there was no government existing at the capital." On the 23d of Decem ber, 1860, Miramon returned to the city, escorted by only two or three aids, having been completely routed the day previous at Calpulalpam. The ministers of France and Spain tried to make terms for him with the advancing General Ortega,- but he would not listen to them. So Miramon fled secretly, taking with him what remained of the English bond-holders' money, which he had stolen eight days before from the legation. The * Mexico in 1861-62, p. 9. 126 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. advanced portion of the constitutional army reached Mexico city the next day — Christmas day — and the government of Juarez was peacefully established in the National Palace on the 11th of January, 1861. There was one more struggle to be endured ere the clerical party should submit to popular rule, and this the most deadly of all. -The Spanish element here dropped from sight and was replaced by the French, or rather by the French emperor, for France would not have been guilty of such wrong against a feeble nation ; but for the following six years she had to see her sons and her resources employed to assassinate free dom, the very form of freedom that she preferred above all others. The compromised clerical and military traitors fled from Mex ico, fearing the vengeance of the Republican government. It is significant that they went directly to Paris, to the man who was already known as the protector of all such, and by whose army they were to be escorted back within a year to renew the cruel struggle against Mexican liberty. Three of the compromised diplomatic representatives re solved to remain, perhaps not aware that their records were so well known to Juarez. They were Pacheco, del Barrio, and Clementi. Four days after the re-establishment of the govern ment in the capital they were ordered to leave the country forthwith. Senor Ocampo, the secretary for foreign affairs, pre pared a circular, stating the reasons for the action, which was sent to every legation where Mexico had a representative. What he said concerning the reasons for dementi's expulsion we will quote in full : Don Louis Clementi has held in this country the mission of nuncio from his holiness the pope. His disposition, and the general tone of the Roman Church which he has represented, has caused him to figure throughout the civil war as a partisan of the seditious clergy of the republic, who, to the greatest degree, have stained with blood the past revolution in this country, under the pretext of religion. Now that the Mexican republic has, in the exercise of its sovereign MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 127 power, declared religious liberty, and the absolute independence of each other of Church and State, the official representative of the Roman Church can have no mission whatever to the general government of the republic. Ocampo.* It is sad to add of this worthy minister Ocampo, one of the most disinterested patriots of the land, that within three years, when Maximilian was emperor and the clericals had induced him to employ Miramon and Marquez as generals, they took the first opportunity to be revenged. Pie had retired from public life and was living in his private residence in the coun try, when Miramon came upon him with his army and brutally murdered him, after torturing him for two days. The full account is given in the Libro Rojo. Let us contemplate the man, the most remarkable in every respect that Mexico has yet produced, Benito Juarez, one of Montezuma's race, without a drop of Spanish blood in his veins, often affectionately styled in Mexico " our little Indian," being small in stature. We call attention to his portrait on the frontispiece of this work, taken from a life-size painting which hangs in the place of honor in the " Hall of Embassadors," in the National Palace, which is regarded as the best in existence of this patriot, whom Castelar called " the saviour of the honor of his country." Juarez was born in 1806, in the little Indian village of San Pablo Guelatao, twenty miles north-east of the city of Oaxaca. His early years were passed in the quiet of the little hamlet, serving as shepherd for his uncle's flocks. His parents having died, leaving him in care of relatives, at the age of twelve he went to a sister living in Oaxaca, where for the first time he began to learn Spanish and to study under the care of a worthy citizen named Perez, who recognized the ability of the lad. Another kind merchant, Senor Diego Chavez, encouraged him to enter the seminary of Oaxaca, from which he graduated with honors. A friendly Franciscan monk urged him to enter the priesthood, but his liberal ideas inclined him to a political career, and therefore he pursued the law course in the * Mexico in 1861-62, p. 9. 128 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. Institute of Sciences, being admitted to the bar in 1834. Before this he had become somewhat prominent in his advocacy of liberal ideas and reforms, and suffered imprisonment during one of the terms when the Conservative party was in power. In 1842 he was elected chief-justice of his native State, and when the Governor of Oaxaca resigned, being unable to quell a revo lution raised by the clericals on account of a proposition to despoil them of some of their possessions in order to defend the State from the invasion of the American army in 1847, Juarez was placed in power, and for the ensuing five years governed most acceptably, bringing the finances of the State to a better condition, encouraging reforms, and making the State the most prosperous of the Mexican Union. In 1853 he was exiled by Santa Anna, on account of his lib eral views, and took up his residence in New Orleans, where he lived in great poverty, but gaining strength for the future conflict from the study of our institutions and our leaders. Washington and Bolivar were his heroes. Two years later he joined Alvarez in a revolution against Santa Anna's despotic rule, and on its success he was again brought into power as minister of justice under President Alvarez. His first act was to abolish the special military and clerical courts, which had so long removed these two classes from the power of the national law. In 1858 he became president, and we shall follow him as we note the events of the country's history. His family life was of the happiest nature. No shadow of injustice or wrong dims the luster of his name. In his vari ous prominent positions many opportunities must have pre sented themselves for him to gain wealth at the expense of the nation, but he was superior to such temptations and died a comparatively poor man. How he impressed a stranger is admirably given in the de scription of Colonel G. S. Church, of the United States, who visited him at Chihuahua during the French intervention : Pushing aside the curtains from the door of an interior room a quiet, unassuming man advances to meet you. A courteous greeting, a frank MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 129 grasp of the hand, and a cordial invitation to be seated place you at once at your ease, and you prepare to study the Indian before you. He is, perhaps, five feet five inches in height, thick set, and with a broad, full chest, which gives him a powerful vitality. A bold rounded and high forehead, very slightly receding from a vertical line, eyes large and swimming in liquid blackness, finely cut eyebrows, arched and curving far back, a goodly development of practical as well as theoretical brain. While at rest his Indian features do not show the power behind them; but once kindled to action the brain illuminates every one of them, and the black eyes flash a peculiar light, as if to give more forcible expression to his language. A quiet, unyielding determination and a firm reliance upon self are the impressions you gain of him upon acquaintance. You converse upon politics, and you find that your ideas are not more thor oughly republican than his ; you speak of war, and his military knowledge meets you half-way; you turn to political economy and find that you pro pose nothing that he has not analyzed, and you finally leave him with the impression that you have met one of the ablest men that Mexico has pro duced.* Such was the man on whom had already fallen the heaviest burden of responsibility and care for his country's freedom that had probably ever rested on a patriot's heart. How well and conscientiously he bore it, and to what victory he carried it, this record will soon show. If our space had permitted it would have been a pleasure to have presented a view of the noble men who stood so faithfully by him to the last through that " great fight of afflictions," and who were, in the mercy of God, spared to share his triumph. Prominent among these was Matias Romero, his worthy and distinguished representative at Washington, who so. faithfully and laboriously sustained his duties as embassador of Mexico. Few have any adequate idea of the toil demanded from one filling the position of Mexican representative during the events of the Intervention. Seiior Romero had not only the usual diplomatic duties resting upon him, but had also to be on the alert to collect the archives of the governments of England, France, Spain, Austria, and the Holy See in regard to the Mexican Empire, so called, and to make this information available for his government and also for the Presi- * Historical and Political Review of Mexico, by Col. G. S. Church. 10 130 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. dent of the United States. It was necessary to have the truth concerning Mexico published in order to counteract the false statements of the press agents of the empire ; to purchase arms and munitions of war and charter steamers to convey them to ports where they could be safely entered ; to print Mexican bonds and negotiate them in the market, and to make contracts for other purposes as well as being the medium of intercourse to and from the outside world for all matters, postal and other wise. Senor Romero has been honored almost ever since by his grateful country, by keeping him in his important position. The cabinet of Juarez also deserve mention for their loyalty during the dark period from 1862 to 1867. We can but name these patriots : Sebastian Lerdo de Tejada, secretary of state ; Jose Maria Yglesias, minister of the interior; Ignacio Mejia, minister of war ; and Ignacio Mariscal, minister of justice. And the brave military chiefs who served their country with such valor, Zaragoza, Escobedo, Porfirio Diaz, Salazar, Arteaga, Trevino, Corona, and others, deserve honorable mention for their services to the cause of freedom in Mexico. Before proceeding with our narrative let us consider the man who was to be for the ensuing five years the controlling impulse of all the wrong which liberty was to suffer from his " Intervention." This picture here given well expresses the sinister character of the man whom Mexico especially has rea son to hold in abhorrence through all her future life. What a record has he left behind for the world to study ! We abridge a few sentences from Hugo's summary of his earlier life: Charles Louis Napoleon was born in Paris, on the 20th of April, 1808, the son of Hortense de Beauharnais and Louis Napoleon, then King of Holland, and brother of Napoleon I. This youth commenced his varied career by scheming in his own interest for the overthrow of the French monarchy, on the 30th of Oc tober, 1836, at Strasburg, being then twenty-eight years of age. This abortive attempt was pardoned by King Louis Philippe, with the understanding that Louis Napoleon was to exile himself to the United States. But before two years had expired he LOUIS NAPOLEON, Who devised and carried out the " Intervention " in Mexico. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 131 violated his parole and returned from America to Switzerland. Finding that the French government was made uneasy by his return, he wrote assuring them " that he lived almost alone in the house where his mother died, and that his firm desire was to remain quiet." They supposed he meant what he said, but his characteristic duplicity manifested itself when on the 20th of August, 1840 — only two years after giving his solemn pledge to the government — he landed at Boulogne at the head of sixty followers (disguised as French soldiers). He carried a gilt eagle on the top of a flag-staff, with a live eagle in a cage, and a large supply of proclamations pronouncing for an empire. As he and his curious following advanced up the street he flung money to the passers-by, and, elevating his hat on the point of his sword, cried out, " Vive l'Empereur ! " Meeting with no favorable response, he fled, but was captured and condemned to imprisonment for life in the fortress of Ham, from which, disguised as a working mason, he escaped six years afterward and took refuge in England. In 1848 the French monarchy fell and a republic was pro claimed. Professing to lay aside his imperial aspirations, he returned to France and offered himself as a representative of the people in the Constitutional Assembly. When elected he made a display of his pretended democratic sentiments, saying, " All my life shall be consecrated to the strengthening of the republic." Though some were suspicious of him he was elected president. On the 20th of December he took the oath, and as the presi dent of the Assembly uttered the formula, " In the presence of God, and before the French people, I swear to remain faith ful to the democratic republic, one and indivisible, and to ful- . fill all the duties which the Constitution imposes upon me," Louis Napoleon raised his right hand and said, " I swear it." He then voluntarily added : The suffages of the nation and the oath which I have just taken com mand my future conduct. My duty is traced. I will fulfill it as a man of honor. I will see enemies of the country in all those who would try to change by illegal means what France entire has established. 132 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. The president of the Assembly replied, " We call God and man to witness the oath which has just been taken." They expected he would be true to this pledge. The Consti tution, which he swore he would maintain, contained among other articles these : Article 36. The representatives of the people are inviolable. Article 37. They cannot be arrested on a criminal charge save in case of fla grant misdemeanor, nor prosecuted except after the Assembly has permitted. Article 68. Every measure by which the president of the republic dis solves the National Assembly, or places obstacles in the way of the execution of its decrees, is a crime of high treason. By this sole act the president is suspended from his functions. On December 2, 1851, less than three years after the mem orable oath was taken, he proclaimed, " The National Assembly is dissolved ; the first military division is placed in a state of siege ; the council of state is dissolved." To this terrible record of the highest treason against a whole nation by this perjured adventurer the historian adds the fol lowing dreadful record, in which one would fain hope that there may be some exaggeration, as the account was written so close to the events — only a few weeks after — and under the fearful pressure of that coup d'etat. But it must be confessed that the judgment of charity thus intimated finds little con firmation of its hope in the subsequent career of this man either in France, Rome, or, above all, in Mexico. The historian adds: At the same time Paris learned that fifteen of the "inviolable" repre sentatives of the people had been arrested in their homes during the night by order of Louis Napoleon. In the days following he seized the execu tive power, made an attempt on the legislative power, drove away the As sembly, expelled the high court of justice, took twenty-five millions from the bank, gorged the army with gold, raked Paris with grape-shot, and terrorized France. He proscribed eighty-four of the representatives of the people, decreed despotism in fifty-eight articles under the title of a con stitution; garroted the republic, made the sword of France a gag in the mouth of liberty, transported to Africa and Cayenne ten thousand Demo crats, exiled forty thousand Republicans, placed in all souls grief and on all foreheads blushes. * * The Destroyer of the Second Republic, by Victor Hugo, 1852, p. 29, etc. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 133 How significant it is that this violent change from a free republic to a despotic empire was quickly indorsed by the hierarchy of Rome and the pope, and that neither is on record as having uttered one word of protest against the overthrow of the government of the people or the acts of treason by which it was consummated ! It is equally significant that the first per son to congratulate him on the complete success of his move was the Countess Montijo, who was already known as being under Jesuit influence, intensely bigoted, and to whom he was soon afterward married. The church party could now rejoice that they had an emperor and that he was suitably mated for their purposes. Victor Hugo seems justified in his assertion that " Louis Napoleon had on his side the clergy, from the highest to the lowest, in the coup d'etat." Almonte, the embassador of the clerical party of Mexico, fonnd in Napoleon a ready listener to his wicked statements con cerning Mexico, that it was " monarchical to the core," only held back from expressing its preferences by a faction of Republicans "without character, who were stained by crimes and oppres sions of the worst kind," and that it would be a highly meri torious and Christian act for some power to intervene to free Mexico from her oppressors, and give her an opportunity to express her preferences, which, he said, " she would do promptly and gratefully." Louis Napoleon was eager for just such a chance, now outlined as desirable. We have already seen what his apologist, the Abbe Domenech, admitted as to the ultimate object of Napoleon's intervention in Mexican affairs, and how he fondly anticipated that the results would so redound to his fame as to be afterward regarded as " the crowning event of the nineteenth century," and Mexico was but the stepping-stone to this consummation. He was already being dispossessed of the idea that he could emulate his uncle's fame and become the dictator of Europe, to give away thrones and dominions. Probably he imagined he could gain in the New World what was eluding his grasp in the Old. He knew he could use the papacy in aid of his purpose, by having an under- 134 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. standing with the pope, and that he could calculate on Spanish aid in view of the compensation he could render her in South America. We find both these influences co-operating with him in the project. The intervention in Mexico was to be an entering wedge to split up the democracy of America and found a mo narchical system upon its ruins. Similar work south of Mexico would have been comparatively easy. With our United States divided by civil war, and the presence of an aristocratic ele ment in the Confederacy, the bribe of a restored slavocracy might have had an immense influence in reconciling the South ern States to a monarchical system, which could have been mild at first, and less constitutional later. How long could the North have held her own under such circumstances ? With her mill ions of Romanists acting as a unit under priestly guidance, and a doubtful papal immigration (and the reader will remember that immigration, avowed by the Duke of Richmond, is hinted at by Domenech as part of Napoleon's plan) pouring in upon us, soon gaining the " balance of power," then, alas ! might soon have come a long farewell to freedom and republican govern ment on this continent. Bnt there is a divine providence in human affairs, however much such men as Napoleon choose to ignore it, and we were under its blessed care. On his restoration to Mexico city President Juarez set him self zealously to establish order and carry out the enactments of the Congress, especially in regard to the financial condition of the country. When he and his cabinet reached the capital they found the treasury empty, so the continuation of the seculariza tion and sale of the unused church property became a necessity. The hierarchy had previously been requested to consider the situation and to relinquish a portion of their large possessions that they did not require, but without avail. Even the Abbe Domenech admits that they were blind to refuse such a com promise. The sales, though slow at first, brought into the public treasury within a year the sum of $5,000,000,* and confirmed * La Carte de Roma y el Emperador Maximiliano. Mexico, 1870. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 135 the purpose of the Liberals to thus utilize a portion of this vast property. The pope issued his expostulations and sustained the Mexi can bishops in their resistance to the law until two of them — the Bishops of Puebla and of Guadalajara — were exiled by the government for rebellious interference. As a last resource the pope issued an allocution declaring, " We condemn, disavow, and declare absolutely null and void and of no effect all the decrees above mentioned, and all the acts which the civil power in Mexico has done, in contempt of the ecclesiastical authority of the holy see." He then expresses " the deep grief of his soul " over these principles, and closes by threatening the " pen alties and censures " which he holds against " these usurpers of the rights of the holy see." He utters a similar jeremiad against South America, as " following the sad example of the Liberals of Mexico." * The leaders of Mexico, instead of heeding the pope's nullifi cation, shrugged their shoulders and went ou with the good work of building up the welfare of the nation. Mexico and South America were not doing a deed unknown in any other nation, as the papal lamentation might lead one to believe, but they were doing what England, France, Italy, Portugal, Germany, and nearly all the other States of Christendom had already done. Of the nationalization of ecclesiastical property, and abolition of monastic institutions, European history is full, from Magna Charta and King John down to our days in Italy. Mackenzie puts the facts in regard to France : The possessions of the Church, amounting to one third of all the soil of France, were seized. Henceforth the priests were to be paid their pain fully reduced salaries by the State. Tlie Church held property valued at £80,000,000 ($400,000,000), and yielding an annual revenue of over £3,000,000 ($15,000,000), all of which was appropriated by the State in its necessity in the period when it abolished feudalism and privilege and laid the foundations of French freedom. The nation afterward safe guarded her rights and limited the interference of the pope and the * Christian World, vol. xiv, p. 195. 136 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. Church in matters of state by a dictated concordat, which is to-day her defens,e against ecclesiastical aggressions. (P. 5.) And in the same way Magna Charta, wrested by the liberty- loving and sturdy barons of England from that papal tyrant and coward, King John, proved the sure foundation of English freedom, notwithstanding the thunders of excommunication which Pope Innocent III. hurled against the barons and their Charta, and his foolish attempt to hand over the English king dom to Philip of France, as well as absolving John from all obligation of fidelity to the solemn signature which he had affixed to the great document. No wonder that when "the French troops and tlieir officers reached Mexico, in 1864, and heard the complaints of the church party against the Republicans on these grounds, they were amazed, knowing well, as they did, that their own country had done the very same things with the papal Church and its over grown wealth and monastic orders, and in doing so had laid the foundations of the liberties and greatness of France. It was equally a matter of surprise to the Abbe Domenech, and for the same reasons. Mexico and South America could thus quote a score of precedents to justify their actions in all that they did, and yet the pope in this allocution bitterly denounced Mexico as if her government and legislative action were unprec edented and unjust. It is surprising how legally the statesmen of Mexico moved in their measures to build up the condition of their country on right foundations. Even in this very matter, where to the superficial observer they might seem to be depending alone on power, they kept within the clear limits of the accepted usages and law which govern such cases. There is probably no higher authority on the " Law of Nations " than Emerich Vattel, of Switzerland, and no commentator on English law superior to Sir William Blackstone. Both of these jurists lay down rules which vindicate the actions of the popular government of Mexico in the demands which they made on the vast ecclesiastical property. Blackstone says : MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 137 The priests would have engulfed all the real estate of England. It took centuries to protect and perfect the nation against their rapacity and schemes to avoid the statutes. And Vattel covers the whole question arising out of this con dition of affairs in the following rule : Far from the goods of the Church being exempted because they are consecrated to God, it is for that very reason that they should be the first taken for the welfare of the State. There is nothing more agreeable to the common Father of men than to preserve a nation from destruction. As God has no need of property the consecration of goods to him is their devotion to such purposes as are pleasant to him. Besides, the property of the Church, by the confession of the clergy themselves, is chiefly des tined for the poor; and when the State is in want it is, doubtless, the first pauper and the worthiest of succor. To carry out the provision and purposes of the national Con stitution and guard the liberties which it guarantees, enact ments of the legislature, called " Laws of Reform," were issued. We will here enumerate the leading items of these laws, issued by the secretary of state : The complete separation of Church and State. Congress cannot pass laws establishing or prohibiting any religion. The free exercise of religious services. The State will not give official recognition to any religious festivals, save the Sabbath, as a day of rest. Religious services are to be held only within the place of worship. Clerical vestments are forbidden in the streets. Religious processions are forbidden. The use of church-bells is restricted to calling the people to religious work. Pulpit discourses advising disobedience to the law, or injury to any. one, are strictly forbidden. Worship in churches shall be public only. Gifts of real estate to religious institutions are unlawful, with the sole exception of edifices designed exclusively to the purposes of the insti tution. The State does not recognize monastic orders nor permit their estab lishment. The association of Sisters of Charity is suppressed in the republic, and Jesuits are expelled and may not return. Matrimony is a civil contract and to be duly registered. The religious service may be added. 138 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. Cemeteries are under civil inspection and open for the burial of all classes and creeds. No one can sign away their liberty by contract or religious vow. Education in the public schools is free and compulsory. This synopsis of the " Laws of Reform" represents the action of the Mexican Congress on the 12th of February, 1857, with the amendments of the same of September, 1873, and the cir cular issued by the Interior Department January 15, 1877. In view of the conspiracy to overthrow the republic and to establish a monarchy a special law was passed in 1862, making a capital crime of Invitations given by Mexicans, or by foreigners resident in the republic, to subjects of other powers, to invade the national territory or change the fonn of government the republic has adopted, whatever the pretext set up. Yet within three months after the enactment of this law Almonte and his associates left Paris for Mexico and were re ceived with honor by the French military chiefs at Vera Cruz, given the protection of their flag and an escort of two thousand cavalry, thus violating the statutes of the land, which they pre tended they had come in a friendly spirit to establish. The pretense under which that army and the forces of En gland and Spain were sent to Mexico was the " tripartite treaty," reached at the convention of London, and signed by the three powers on the 31st of October, 1861, for the accom plishment of common objects in Mexico. The necessity for such a convention had been well worked up by the representa tive of Napoleon in Mexico, M. Saligny, who all through, like Shylock, mercilessly insisted upon having his " pound of flesh," no matter how much blood came with it. In the unsettled condition of Mexico by the intrigues and pronunciamentos of the clerical party during these years, society was disturbed and wrongs were perpetrated, by forced loans, highway rob bery, and otherwise ; and foreigners shared in these imposts, Frenchmen among them, of course. Saligny trumped up a heavy list of these inflictions against the Republican govern- MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 139 ment and demanded heavy indemnities for each case. While admitting some of them the government declared the majority were without foundation, and asked for the proofs, which Sa ligny could not furnish. He resented all attempts to require evidence of his French claims, and his master backed him up in his demands. Let it also be remembered that these forced loans and other criminalities were not inflicted by the Republican party, but by their bitter foes during the brief terms in which from time to time they held power, and yet that all of these were saddled upon the Republican government when restored, which had to pay these exactions, as in the case where Miramon robbed the British Legation of the $600,000. Another item of the claim was made out of the debts due to foreigners who had lent Mex ico money in her emergencies, at enormous rates of interest, and these debts she did not deny, save when fictitious claims were added to them, as in the case of the "Jecker bonds." The Mexican government, on its restoration to power, finding the treasury empty, and being unable to raise money sufficient, postponed payment of the interest on outside debts for two years, promising then to resume payment. In the business world such a concession is constantly made by creditors toward those who only want 'time' to enable them to recover, espe cially when the parties thus favored have hitherto met tlieir ob ligations faithfully. But Mexico, on which now rested the duty of self-preservation, which in a nation is certainly for the time being superior to the obligation to pay debts, was now to real ize no mercy from hard-hearted men who took her by the throat, saying, " Pay me what thou owest ! " though she pleaded, " Have patience with me, and I will pay thee all." M. Saligny had circulated the false and cruel impression that she could but would not. Hence England and Spain were led blindfolded into " the London Convention," only to be unde ceived a year after, when their commissioners reached Mexico and ascertained the truth from interviews with Senor Doblado, President Juarez's secretary of state. England and Spain 140 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. freely gave Mexico the time she required, and their claims were recognized to be paid, principal and interest. As we examine this unworthy transaction there is revealed an unexampled rascality. Government documents furnished by Mexico present the facts of her indebtedness with detailed statements of what had been paid these three nations, and what she still owed to each when they invaded her soil. Apart from the Jecker claim, the diplomatic correspondence shows, quoting a dispatch of Sir Charles Wyke that was laid before Parlia ment, " the French have only a small debt of $190,S56 to re cover, which is being paid off by twenty-five per cent, of the import duties levied at Vera Cruz." The first thing that Saligny did when he left his legation at the capital and came down to meet the French force, to guide its action, was to advise the French commander to seize the custom-house and appropriate its income to meet the French claims, so that it is likely that almost all had been paid ere Sir Charles wrote his dis patch. Saligny contended, however, that the claims of the " Jecker bonds " should be added to the French debt, and the Mexican government had to submit. After a full investi gation they decided that all that could be honestly claimed by France for the debt, the indemnities due to French subjects for losses during the revolutions, for interest, and the Jecker bonds was $2,859,917. So her debts to the three nations were shown to be, "to British subjects, $69,311,657; to Spanish subjects, $9,461,986, and to the French the smallest sum of all, $2,859,- 917." France was then the nation which had the least motive to make war on Mexico. Napoleon's object was not merely the settlement of the claim, but he sought a pretext for a quarrel with Mexico for the accomplishment of ulterior purposes. When the English and Spanish commissioners understood this they withdrew from the country, leaving Saligny to push the outrageously magnified Jecker bonds, which Napoleon was confident they could force to payment. M. Jecker was a Swiss speculator who went to Mexico and assumed the role of a banker during the period when Miramon MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 141 and the clericals held the capital. The ready money of the party running low, Jecker made the most of the opportunity. He could furnish $750,000 cash, and securities amounting, appar ently, to $740,000 more, in all $1,490,428. " For this amount the reactionary government issued paper to the value of $15,- 000,000, at six per cent, annually, and fundable in eight or ten years." A large part of the issue was made available " for the value on their face at the custom-houses in Mexico, in the pro portion of a fifth of their exhibits, M. Jecker to pay the bearer interest at three per centum." * Merchants who bought up these bonds were soon to realize how Miramon had deceived them when they began to present them for duties. The constitutional president, on learning of their issue, had proclaimed them illegal and worthless, and not a custom-house in Mexico would accept them. Merchants turned to the French Legation, on the ground that France had recognized the Miramon party as the government of Mexico, and a plot was raised to include these bonds as part of the French claims against the Juarez government and to demand payment for the full amount on their face. Just then it was discovered that Jecker was not a French subject, and therefore his bonds could not legally be included in French claims ; but the rogues were not to be defeated, and an effort was made to naturalize him and leave the date of the nefarious deed in the background. Before the naturalization papers could arrive from France two packets of secret correspondence between Jecker and his representatives in Paris fell into the hands of the Republican troops, were forwarded to the president, and the villainous conspiracy was revealed. They stated, among other things, how the conspirators were manufacturing public opinion in Europe, how much they were afraid of the coming of Pacheco, the embassador of Juarez, who would be sure to expose their baseness, of their efforts to get the naturalization papers to Jecker, and how they "showed your letters to his majesty," and speak of their intercourse with "the duke," * Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States, 1863, pp. 239, 249. 142 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. called in one place " the new duke," which soon identified the person intended, who was so deeply interested in the success of the Jecker claims. Who was this person so high at court, thus mysteriously named as " near the throne," who had so much at stake in these fraudulent transactions? Only a few knew when the dis patches were written, but recently it has been given to the world. The new duke referred to was the Count de Morny, illegitimate half-brother of the French emperor. When a child he was given into the custody of a Frenchman by name of de Morny, who had his home in the West Indies. His mother left him 40,000 francs, which was intrusted to the guardian, who squandered it in gambling. When the young man be came of age he was penniless, but returned to France and en tered the army, developing soon the sharp points of his character. He and Louis Napoleon had never yet met, but Napoleon heard of him as a suitable instrument for his purposes in the coup d'etat which he was then contemplating. He was brought to Paris and proved just the conscienceless personage such as Napoleon wanted to aid in this great crime against the re public. When he had proclaimed himself emperor the traitors who shared in the iniquitous plan were rewarded, De Moray's share being money, which he much coveted, and the life-presi dency of the Corps Legislatif. A more mercenary man never held office. His extravagance earned for him the title of " the Magnificent Spendthrift." It is asserted that " his great crime was in taking money from all sides, all parties, all men." While president of the Corps Legislatif he was " known to receive a yearly subsidy from the Viceroy of Egypt for certain reasons." Napoleon made him a duke while Miramon was the clerical party's President of Mexico, and when the chance arose to make a few millions out of these infamous Jecker bonds this unprincipled man demeaned himself still further by stooping to unite with Jecker and Miramon to organize the scheme to float these worthless bonds and to force their payment in full on Mexico, while his half-brother seized upon them as an ad- MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 143 ditional pretext to carry out his ulterior purposes in America. They were worthy of each other in the wicked use they made of power.* When our civil war broke out the French emperor deemed that the time had come for the development of his purposes in America. The convention of London was arranged, and the allied fleet arrived at Vera Cruz in December, 1861. There was some surprise felt on finding that England had no soldiers, only seven hundred marines as a guard of honor for her rep resentative, and Spain but a few soldiers, while France had nearly seven thousand men fully prepared for aggressive move ments. The Spanish commissioner was General Prim, the En glish, Sir Charles Wyke, and the French, M. E. Jurien. They opened negotiations with the government of President Juarez, professing solemnly over their respective signatures that the object of their coming was entirely pacific, without any inten tion of interference with the form of government preferred by the nation, but they were there only as " lookers-on, to preside at the grand spectacle of your regeneration, guaranteed by order and liberty." They then gently intimate that they also seek " satisfaction for outrages inflicted, and sacred obligations that have not been discharged," but assert that the other is the higher object of their coming. To this President Juarez replied that, while obliged to them for their interest in the welfare of the country, he was not con scious that Mexico needed any intervention for the regulation of her affairs, being competent to manage for herself ; but in regard to any claims, he was willing to hear and consider them, and that they could appoint commissioners on their part, who should be met by others from him, and the cases be considered. He did more ; for on the commissioners informing him that their men were suffering from sickness on account of the heat and climate, and would soon be liable to the yellow fever, so * Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States, 1863, part i, p. 239, etc. The Cosmopolitan, May, 1890. Christian World, vol. xvii, p. 72. Diplomatic Corre spondence Presented to Parliament, 1862, pp. 602-614. 144 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. common in Vera Cruz during the heated term, and requesting his permission to move up to the mountain region where they would be exempt, the president kindly granted this conces sion as soon as the allies would agree upon its conditions. This led without delay to what is called " the Convention of Soledad " (twenty-six miles from Vera Cruz), where the commissioners pro ceeded and were met by the secretary of state. A conference was agreed to, to be held at Orizaba, up in the mountains and eighty-two miles from Vera Cruz, where it was comfortable and healthy, and during the negotiations the troops might be brought up and allowed to occupy the towns of Cordova, Ori zaba, and Tehuacan. The fourth article stipulated : That it may not be believed, even remotely, that the allies have signed those preliminaries in order to procure the passage of the fortified posi tions garrisoned by the Mexican army, it is stipulated that, in the unhappy event of the rupture of negotiations, the forces of the allies shall evacuate the aforesaid towns and situate themselves in the line which is before said fortifications on the way to Vera Cruz. The fifth article provided that in these unfortunate circum stances " the hospitals that the allies may have shall remain under the safe-guard of the Mexican nation." These fortifications were places of great natural strength and could easily be defended by even a small force. The president could not then dream that any of the persons whom he had thus treated with such candor and kindness would prove un worthy or unfaithful to this fourth article, after having accepted and signed it. As the negotiations progressed the bad faith of the French began its development and introduced confusion, and at last involved defeat of the entire effort. The first of these was the announcement that General Miramon and staff were on the ex pected English mail steamer with the intention of renewing the civil war which had only just died out after the three years' bloody struggle. It was also ascertained that a party of church troops, with horse and munitions, were awaiting him above to enable him to penetrate into the interior. The commissioners MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 145 discussed the situation, and the majority were for preventing him from landing, while the English Commodore Dunlop de clared he would " arrest him for having robbed the British Legation if he lands while our flag is flying here." It was very significant that Saligny " earnestly protested in the name of his government against any such thing being attempted." Nor could he be moved by the consideration urged by the British and Spanish commissioners, that to allow Miramon to land, and thus invade the country with an expedition of his own, would utterly disgust the Liberal government with whom they were treating and lead it and the nation to infer that the allied commissioners must be in collusion with that traitor to per mit him to land where their flags were. flying. So Dunlop, not withstanding Saligny's protest, two days after, when the packet arrived, had Miramon arrested and returned to Havana by the next steamer, and the difficulty ended for a time. The English and Spanish claims for indemnity were accepted by the Mexican commissioners without any difficulty. They were recognized and placed on file to be discharged as soon as possible. But when the French claims were presented the commissioners were simply amazed, and especially when the " Jecker bonds " were introduced and full recognition de manded for them. No wonder that the English and Spanish commissioners were astounded when demand was made by Sa ligny for their recognition to the full amount of the $15,000,000 ! In common honesty the government of Juarez did not owe Jecker a single dollar. When Miramon fled from the city on the approach of the national troops, and President Juarez had arrived, he was soon after called on by Jecker, who claimed to be under the protection of the French Legation. Under the supposition that the president was intimidated by the In tervention and would yield any thing, Jecker made a demand for the payment of the bonds issued by the fugitive clerical president on the plea that "one government must be held responsible for the acts and obligations of the other." This Juarez refused to do. A parallel case would have been orig- 11 146 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. inated had Jefferson Davis after the battle of Bull Run entered Washington, and while he remained there in the absence of Mr. Lincoln had issued bonds to French subjects and gone off with the money received from them, and Napoleon on the re turn of Mr. Lincoln had sent a force to the United States to demand the payment of said bonds. The Jecker claims were originated by one who was a rebel against the constitutional government, which had not ceased to exist during the three years, and ought not therefore to be held responsible for the acts of an unlawful party. For the sake of peace, and in order to get rid of the hostile visitors, the Mexican government was disposed to concede the original sum of $750,000, with five per cent, interest, but repudiated any further claims on that ground. The English and Spanish commissioners positively declined to be parties to pass up such claims to the Mexican president, and reported the facts to their respective governments, and were sustained in their course. The next item in the French demands was for reclamations for injuries and impositions suffered by French subjects on various occasions during past years; for them a round sum of $12,000,000 was claimed. No detailed statements were presented, no names of persons or dates of events or ex tent of wrong or injury in each case were forthcoming, and when these were inquired for the French minister replied that his government had made a general estimate to cover all the cases, and that he regarded that as entirely sufficient. The English and Spanish commissioners, after having submitted the items in their claims which they were to urge on the Mexican government, felt that they could not be parties to include a demand like this without vouchers of any kind. They then proposed to M. Sa ligny to grant to the Mexican government the right to examine into the justice of such claims through the medium of a mixed commission, to which Mexico was ready to consent; but even this reasonable proposition was declined by M. Saligny. Mex ico must pay what France demanded, " trusting to her high sense of honor to demand only what was right." The ulterior object of MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 147 France was by this made manifest. Up to this hour the French government on repeated occasions had declared that it went to Mexico "to obtain satisfaction for its demands, and nothing more." The French representative signed the agreement in the treaty of London and of Soledad, " not to interfere in the in terior affairs of Mexico." In the address of Napoleon's secre tary of state to the French Parliament he used these words : France can do no more than she has already — that is, to repeat the assurance that she does not propose to intervene in any manner with the internal affairs of Mexico; that her sole object is to obtain payment of her claims and reparation of the injuries that had been done her. . . . But to compel them by force, never ! Honest men have only certain terms to characterize profes sions like these when they contrast so widely with the conduct pursued. It is worthy of note that while the convention was sitting ships of the French navy were visiting the leading ports of Mexico, trying to induce them to " pronounce " in favor of the plan of Almonte (the agent of the church party) and mon archy, as well as sheltering traitors like Miramon, Marquez, and others who were ready, when this convention should break up, to commence their efforts to overthrow the Republican govern ment preferred by the nation and erect on its ruins an imperial throne ! To proceed further was impossible ; the convention of Sole- dad terminated. The English and Spanish representatives duly informed the Mexican government, and retired with their mili tary escort from Mexico, sending on the facts to their respective governments, which approved their action. The French repre sentative alone remained and transferred to the French general and his army the obligation to proceed without delay to execute the will of their imperial master, and ordered up the additional troops that had arrived. Saligny was asked if he really did not intend to observe the distinct condition into which they had all entered, in case the negotiations were broken off, to retire their troops " to the line below the fortifications " on the Cumbres before beginning their operations. Not he ! He well knew 148 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. he served a master who would freely condone the base treach ery of thus violating his own signature. He had an immense advantage for his purpose, and was going to retain it, no matter how all honorable soldiers, or the whole world itself, might stamp it with infamy as an almost unprecedented violation of diplo matic and military honor ! The French emperor gained what he wanted, the power to act alone, on his own terms, in forcing his demands, at the bayonet's point, on an enemy whose gener osity he violated, while he demanded full payment of fictitious claims, and then drove him from the seat of authority to which the nation had elected him in order to place upon it a stranger whom he had already selected for that purpose ! In addition to a full account of the convention so disastrously ended Sir C. Wyke and General Prim declared to their govern ments that their observation and inquiries in Mexico " had fully satisfied them that a monarchy was not desired by any one in Mexico save a few Conservatives and the church party." The church party embraces all that is bigoted and fanatical in the country, and is therefore retrogressive in policy, and at variance with the spirit of the age, and is detested by a great majority of the people, who are in favor of a liberal policy. (P. 723.) It is not usual for the secretary of state of a great nation to take the responsibility of expressing himself so bluntly concern ing the measures of a neighboring sovereign and his government as Lord John Russell did at this time concerning the whole question under review here. Writing to his embassador at Paris, who he expected would report the sentiments of his government to the French secretary of state, Lord Russell says : It is hardly possible that claims so excessive as that of $12,000,000 in the lump, without an account, and that of $15,000,000 for $750,000 actually received, can have been put forward with an expectation that they would be complied with. ... I stated to Mr. Flahault (the French embassador at London) that what we could not agree to, and must keep clear of, was the putting forward of claims merely for the sake of making a quarrel. That was a course we could not adopt ourselves nor defend in others. . . . The principle -of non-intervention having been always maintained by the MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 149 English government, our force was withdrawn and our flag hauled down upon the express determination of Admiral de la Graviere and M. Saligny to march to Mexico for the purpose of overthrowing the government of President Juarez.* General Prim in his address to the Cortes held exactly the same position. Having gained their point of being left alone in Mexico, being heavily re-enforced, ultimately up to forty-five thousand men, and with the full intention of forcing the payment of both these enormous claims, and in addition resolved to make Mexico " pay the expense of the war, which on her side was not provoked, nor declared by the other," as Seiior Romero phrased it, the march toward Mexico city was begun. Before the allied com missioners had left Saligny made an unexpected proposal. He had evidently become alarmed at the effect which his enormous demands would have on public opinion in Europe when the reasons for the breaking up of the convention were made known ; so he offered to abandon the Jecker claims if the other two commissioners would indorse the claim for $12,000,000, which, being entirely without evidence, they would not do. Saligny then withdrew his proposal and referred the matter to Napoleon. Late in September, 1862, the Republican forces operating between Vera Cruz and the city of Mexico intercepted another packet of letters addressed to M. Jecker by his friends in Paris. They were sent to President Juarez, and were found even more nefarious than the previous ones captured. The president sent them to Senor Romero, who laid them before the government at Washington, and they were sent to Congress. A few sentences will show their purport, and who was operating influentially behind the scenes in this abominable business, and also give a clearer view of the objects of these enemies of freedom and justice. One tells Jecker, among other things, "Your letter of July 16 has been presented entire before the eyes of his Maj- * Diplomatic Correspondence Presented to Parliament, 1862, part iii, pp. 242, 720, 801. 150 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. esty, as has been done with the previous ones when their tenor has permitted." Another of this band of sharpers writes : Affairs are taking a better aspect for us. For a decision has been come to to colonize. Forty-five thousand men are to be sent out. . . . Our friends think the bonds will be admitted in Mexico. I will divulge noth ing though I see every thing has been prohibited since the disgusting correspondence of Sir C. Wyke has been submitted to Parliament. That diplomate has been your adversary and deadly enemy. . . . Feeling itself almost anticipated, and closely watched by Wyke, the French government lets nothing transpire with reference to its projects of protectorate, colon ization, etc. Not less than eighteen generals go out with the expedi tionary corps, for which reason it must be very considerable. . . . The expedition will have relation also to the affairs of the United States. Jecker's father in another letter says : I have not deceived you in repeating to you now for more than a year that there would be colonization, a throne, protectorate, etc. I believe, also, these forces have in view to restrain the United States, drunk with pride and vain boasting. ... In Paris, for the present, it is better not to wake the cat that sleeps. Wyke has been our real enemy, Juarez should burn a long candle for him. . . . With forty-five thousand men submission will follow, and even a pressure will be brought to bear upon the United States, the jiosition of which is not without its influence on what passes. . With reference to the organization of the government (in Mexico), Maximilian was nothing more than a pilot balloon without any importance. Who will be placed to govern under the tutelage of France I cannot say. . . . C (who has just returned from Mexico) says : "The reactionaries fear the entire and full recognition of the bonds, because it would burden the treasury. The Liberals execrate them, and the French believe the calum nies employed to depreciate them, so that I can truly say that I have not encountered any one in Mexico but Saligny who sustains them." * These are merely samples. The "new duke" figures con stantly, and they boast of the able men whom they employ to manufacture public opinion in France and Europe to favor the bonds and to sustain Saligny's policy, yet (np to September 3) the naturalization papers for Jecker had not reached him, and the French government was thus zealously engaged in behalf of a wretched swindler who was not even a French subject ! * Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States, ~So. 54, pp. 375-387. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 151 Having sold his bonds at a large advance, Jecker had obligated himself to pay interest at three per cent, until they were re deemed at the treasury or custom-houses of Mexico for their face. So long as Juarez held power nothing could be realized on them. The interest had to be paid promptly to keep up the credit of the bonds, and Jecker was ruined before aid could reach him. President Juarez (early in October) ordered the arrest and banishment of Jecker and his crew from the country, and thus ended their dreams of enormous wealth at Mexico's expense. The expulsion of Jecker and the contents of the intercepted letters were not long in reaching the English government, and soon after found their place in the London Times. Telegrams to Paris of what was coming created quite a commotion among " those personages who occupy high positions in the court of the Tuileries near the imperial throne." It was in vain the next morning to prohibit the entrance of The Times into Paris as they attempted. Many had obtained the news, and Jules Favre arose in the Chamber of Deputies to question M. Billant, who was known to be the mouth-piece and defender of the em peror. The questions were scorching, such as a minister has rarely had to face in Parliament. The worst could not be spoken, but men understood the meaning of the courageous deputy as he denounced those who had so despicably traded with the char acter of France in a foreign land, while the Duke de Morny sat presiding over the Assembly ! No wonder that Jecker had boasted in the past that Napoleon was bound to sustain him and his bonds because of the hold he had upon his character and of those who stood with him. The Mexican government had come to understand that France was not to blame for her sufferings, and attributed them solely to the emperor. An incident which showed President Juarez's feel ing on the subject occurred at a reception given in his honor at Chihuahua, when an indiscreet admirer spread the French flag on the ground in front of the door with the intent that the president should tread on it. The moment that Juarez saw it 152 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. he turned, went around it, and requested that it be lifted up. When remonstrated with for declining to dishonor the flag that was invading their country he answered : " No; that flag rep resents France, against which we have no cause of complaint. We distinguish between the French people and their emperor, and when all is over France will yet do Mexico justice. Let us honor that flag." On the way to the city of Mexico the French troops under General Laurency were met near Puebla by a force of Repub licans under General Zaragoza, and there, under the shadow of the snow-capped volcanoes, Popocatepetl and Ixtaccihuatl, they suffered the humiliation of defeat by Mexico's poorly equipped soldiers. The heroes of Solferino, who had known no defeat since Waterloo, were driven back to Orizaba with serious loss. It was not because of any special superiority of numbers or facil ities of the ground occupied by the Mexicans in the struggle. Under God it was won by the vigor which comes to those who fight for their homes, their country, and the freedom which they love. This triumph filled Mexico with exultation and hope, and the day, the fifth of May, "Cinco de Mayo," is yearly celebrated. The French troops waited at Orizaba for re-enforcements before renewing their march against Mex ico. The chagrin of Napoleon may be imagined, and his pride urged him to send forward more than adequate resources, with a consequent increase of expense which he confidently expected that Mexico should pay, and which claim was em bodied in the convention between himself and Maximilian, as we shall see. This check and its results consumed several months of time, and enabled President Juarez and the Congress more fully to make their final arrangements for the preservation of the government and the defense of the nation against its implaca ble enemy. At Miramar and Rome matters were being pushed forward in regard to the departure of the Archduke of Austria for Mexico as soon as the French should clear his way to the capital. Already he had accepted the crown proffered him, MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 153 not by " the people of Mexico," as he was untruthfully assured, but by the exiles and traitors who hung around the French court, and by the " Assembly of Notables," so called, who mysteriously kept up from the Mexican capital communica tions with these enemies of their country's freedom. Maxi milian apparently tried to believe their assurances of the senti ments of their country — that he would find his path " strewn with flowers from Vera Cruz to the throne in the ' Halls of Montezuma,' and that all opposition would drop into the dust within a few weeks of his arrival," and " the united nation would gather around him with enthusiasm as their beloved sovereign." Yet, after all these assurances, he seemed to hesi tate, and stipulated that a general vote of the people should be obtained, that he might have the assurance that not a class only, but the nation itself, was really calling him to be their sovereign. This hesitancy was not causeless. It was the result of a warning that he had received by a trusty messenger from President Juarez, in regard to the danger to which his advisers were luring him for their own purposes. Happy had it been for him had he heeded that warning. It appeared on his trial and aided in his condemnation. The Conservative faction assured him that the popular vote which he desired would most certainly be promptly taken. If Maximilian had not been weak-minded and so disposed to yield to undue influence he would have known that such a vote was impossible in view of the fact that the Republican forces were controlling more than two thirds of the nation, and that less than one third was held by French bayonets, and that only in places where the latter held sway could such a vote be taken, and that even then it would be utterly unreliable as an expression of the popular will. Among those surrounding the archduke was Sefior Gutierrez de Estrada, president of the delegates of the "Council of Notables," which was an -assembly of aristocratic aspirants, composed of persons whose families formerly bore titles before the republic superseded them, while the rest of the council was made up of " priests, friars, and military officers in the service 154 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. of the bishops." They anticipated a titled aristocracy as a suit able setting for an imperial throne in Mexico, and this would have required territorial endowments, a law of primogeniture and entail for its due dignity, while the Church was to " raise her mitered fronts in court and Parliament," and Mexico was to bear the financial burdens of those Old World pomps and decorations. Some of the doings became known, and liberals, even in Austria, made themselves merry over the situation and the ridiculous aspects of the matter. Among these questions were proposed : " What relation has the young prince to Mexico, that he should be made emperor ?" " By what title will he reign over a country at the other end of the world ? " while others offered the advice that " Maximilian should study the Spanish, in order to be able to converse with his subjects ! " John Lothrop Motley was at that time the United States embassador at the court of Austria, and was personally ac quainted with the archduke and his views. As an American he was frequently asked his opinion of this curious affair in its different aspects. We place before the reader what he says upon the subject in his correspondence, as follows : Vienna. September 22, 1863. In this capital the great interest just now is about the new Mexican emperor. The Archduke Maximilian is next brother to the Emperor of Austria, and about thirty years of age. He has been a kind of lord high admiral, an office which, in the present condition of the imperial navy, may be supposed to be not a very onerous one. He was Governor-General of Lombardy until that kingdom was ceded to Victor Emmanuel, and he is considered a somewhat restless and ambitious youth. ... It is, I believe, unquestionable that the archduke is most desirous to go forth on this adventure. It is equally certain that the step is exceedingly unpopular in Austria. That a prince of the House of Hapsburg should become the satrap of the Bonaparte dynasty, and should sit on an American throne, which could not exist a moment but for French bayonets and French ships, is most galling to all classes of Austrians. The intrigue is a most embarrassing one to the government. If the fatal gift is refused, Louis Napoleon, of course, takes it highly in dudgeon. If it is accepted, Aus tria takes a kind of millstone around her neck in the shape of gratitude for something she didn't want, and some day she will be expected to pay MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 155 for it in something she had rather not give. The deputation of the so- called "Notables" is expected here this week, and then the conditions will be laid down on which Maximilian will consent to lie in the bed of roses of Montezuma and Iturbide. The matter is a very serious and menacing one to us. He adds, under the same date, to Oliver W. Holmes, and in allusion to the drought then prevailing in Austria, the significant words : There is no glory in the grass nor verdure in any thing. In fact, we have nothing green here but the Archduke Maximilian, who firmly believes that he is going forth to Mexico to establish an American empire, and that it is his divine mission to destroy the dragon of democracy and re establish the true Church, the right divine, and all sorts of games. Poor young man ! Speaking of Maximilian's characteristic and church notions, Mr. Motley adds what might have been expected as a result of the training which he received under the bigoted influence of his mother, the^ Archduchess Sophia : Maximilian adores bull-fights, rather regrets the Inquisition, and con siders the Duke of Alva every thing noble and chivalrous and the most abused of men. It would do your heart good to hear his invocation to that deeply injured shade, and his denunciations of the ignorant and vulgar Protestants who have defamed him. . . . You can imagine the rest.* How completely Maximilian was in the hands of the wily French emperor may be seen in the terms of the treaty which he was required to sign before he left for Mexico. How any man with his eyes open could be induced to bow his neck to accept such a heavy load of financial obligations is incompre hensible. Not merely did it include the cost of the intervention from first to last, but also the claims rejected at Soledad, and which could be made to cover, surreptitiously, even the Jecker bonds. Besides these it was necessary to provide for his im perial salary, the civil list, and all the national expenses, military and naval. Very adroitly the proposed loan of £8,000,000 sterling at ten per cent, interest, about to be floated, professedly * The Correspondence of J. L. Motley, vol. ii, p. 138. 156 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. to put Maximilian in funds to begin his administration, was ar ranged so that fifty-four million francs were at once to be paid to the French emperor on account, and twelve million francs as an installment of the indemnities due to Frenchmen ! Poor Maximilian, this treaty was to prove one of the millstones that was to sink his empire ! He signed it because he was misin formed and deceived as to the prof essedly great resources of the land he thought he was invited to govern ! MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 157 CHAPTER VI. Why Maximilian failed — Warnings in Austrian history — Francis Joseph — Papal denunciation— Denying a grave — Juarez and Congress — Juarez and Lincoln — South American interest — Netherland League — Position of tbe United States — Marshal's disagreement with the archbishop — Impossible task — Em pire without foundation — Abbe Domenech — Career for the Latin race — Grant — Failure of efforts — Nuncio — Pope's expostulation — Clericals in politics — Confidential letter of Carlota — Denial of papal authority. Maximilian had his personal warnings as to the serious risks in which such a course as he was now entering upon might in volve him. He had seen this illustrated under his own eyes during the previous five years, and to what risks and humilia tion attempts to do the papal will and ignore popular rights had brought his brother the emperor, until at last, driven to desper ation by the pope's demands, Francis Joseph had to fling these demands to the winds and break with the papacy in order to save his crown and kingdom. He thus made Austria constitution ally free, and gave Roman Catholic Europe an example which she has been swift to follow in ridding herself of the burden of political Romanism. Many concordats were smashed when it was seen that Austria, so long subservient, could no longer exist in the nineteenth century hampered with one. This had recently occurred under Maximilian's observation, and was the more emphatic as he was obliged to relinquish his viceroyalty of Lombardy and yield up that territory to Victor Emmanuel for the unification of Italy, as demanded by her people, who scorned Austria's claim to rule longer any part of their land. This prince leaves all this scene of rectified wrong in the inter ests of a nation's liberty, as if he had learned no lesson from it to cross the ocean and impose a foreign sovereignty on a free nation, and all this in order to do the will of a crafty pope and 158 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. his clergy, and through the agency of an army of foreigners sent by an unscrupulous sovereign. The Austrian nation had long been regarded as " the broad shield of papacy," and had been trusted accordingly. In all emergencies of the pontiff a word was sufficient to bring the armies of Austria to his aid. Freedom was thus repeatedly crushed and despotism sustained. In her pride and self-confidence she aspired to dominate Germany, and watched with jealous eyes the rising greatness of Prussia. Meanwhile she was closely observed by Louis Napoleon, who coveted her peculiar position as patron of the papacy, and aspired to fill the place of " the eldest son of the Church." To gain this point he was ready to aid Victor Emmanuel to drive Austria out of Italy. The hour desired came in 1859, and the terrible overthrow of Magenta and Solferino spread the gloom and despair of defeat through out the Austrian empire. Four years previously Francis Joseph had completed with the pope a concordat, every item of which had been dictated by the clericals, and under the pro tection of which Austria considered herself safe. The pope's allocution, issued only six weeks later, intended to strengthen the concordat, wrought exactly the other way. As a sample of how the papacy can pour its adulation upon those who stoop so low as the Austrian emperor did to take this yoke upon him, it is very monitory. Thanks to the infinite bounty of God, and to the piety of our most dear son in Jesus Christ, Francis Joseph, Emperor and Apostolic King of Austria, what we desired has come to pass — in this completed concordat — and has been regularly and solemnly confirmed. . . . We offer up great thanksgivings to the Father of mercies and God of all consolation, who has given a wise and enlightened heart to our most dear son in Jesus Christ, Francis Joseph, Emperor and Apostolic King of Austria. All this gush of joy soon proved a delusion, and this " dear son " had a rude awakening when, crushed on the battle-field, he found no hand to help him. Hurrying back to Vienna, he took counsel with the best men of his diversified empire. They advised him to break with the papacy, to cast off the concordat, MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 159 and to unify his empire by granting civil and religious free dom. Acting upon this advice, the emperor adopted a consti tutional course which saved Austria. Under the guidance of Count von Beust (a Protestant statesman, called to be premier) the nation began to enjoy freedom and peace. Nearly all that Kossuth and his compatriots had unsuccessfully struggled to obtain more than a score of years before was conceded, and the empire was at last united in civil and religious freedom, guar anteed to them by their enlightened sovereign and the excel lent constitution which he had signed. While the States around were rejoicing with the Austrians in their freedom and the peace that had come with it, there was one power which surveyed the scene with envious eyes and cursed it, not merely " in their hearts," but in the bitterest language, and that too, in the name of Almighty God, whose holy providence had led these millions out of such long-time tribulation into the happiest condition their country had ever known. That power was the papacy. An allocution full of wrath was pronounced by the pope. How outspoken and violent it was may be judged by our read ers from an epitome of it expressed in his own words. He denounces them for having not only abrogated the concordat with him, but for having, in place of it, dared to pass " the fol lowing odious and abominable laws : " 1. Laws establishing liberty for all opinions, liberty of the press, and liberty of faith and worship. "> 2. Laws granting to the members of all denominations the right of es tablishing schools and colleges. 3. Laws permitting the intermarriage, on terms of religious equality, of Catholics and Protestants. 4. Laws permitting civil marriage. 5. Laws permitting the burial of Protestants in Romish lands where Protestants have no cemeteries of their own in which to bury. 6. Laws establishing public schools for secular education that shall be free from the control of the Romish priesthood. The pope denounces the above laws and declares them "contrary to the doctrines, rights, and authority of the 160 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. Catholic religion ; " and adds, " Let it be understood that the Roman Catholic Church declares such laws as these, wherever they may be enacted, to be null and void." * He closes his lengthy and excited allocution by reminding all who had act, hand, or part in the framing or enactment of those laws that they had made themselves amenable to " the censures and spiritual punish ments" which it was in his power to inflict upon them ! To this un-Christlike tirade Baron von Beust, the premier, calmly re plied through the embassador of Austria at Rome, informing the pope and his curia that they were not going to be moved in the slightest degree from the beneficent course they had deliberately chosen for themselves as freemen ; nor have they been moved from that day to this. The people and the press of Austria have stood by their government loyally, and the clergy have not dared to institute any resistance to the national will. If there be any thing in a man's relation to his fellow-creat ures that is most detestable in the estimation of heathen and Mohammedan people, it is the very course here pursued by the pope of Rome, when he utters his shameful protest against the humanity of the Austrians in allowing a dead Protestant a place to rest in peace. Yet here is a man ready to shed his tears because the Austrians had that much common humanity left. That unreasoning fanatics of his Church should now and then so far forget themselves as thus to insult the dead of other Christian denominations is a small offense compared to this. Here is a man professing to be the chief priest of Chris tianity, publicly taking this awful stand before all the world, and this, too, in our tolerant age, as the avowed and settled policy and principle of his Church every-where, that she holds the power to inflict this last indignity upon the man, the woman, or the babe that dies where his religion has temporal sway ! We may well thank Heaven that Romanism controls only a limited portion of our race, and also that of those she yet con trols there are not five States to-day that would do her bidding on this question, while even this number is growing less. * Christian World, vol. xix, pp. 312-314. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 161 Maximilian was going to a country where such wicked in tolerance was carried out not so many years ago, while in Europe it was common enough, in papal lands, in the days of our fathers. The readers of Dr. Young's Night Thoughts will recall his terrible experience in Spain. Dr. Young, as a last hope for recovery, took his gifted daughter to try the effect of that climate upon the consumption that was wasting her away. She continued to fail and soon died. He went out to make arrangements for her burial and was horrified to learn from the undertaker that no grave could be claimed for her, she having been a " heretic ! " Dr. Young inquired of the man what then was he to do. A shrug of the shoulders was the only answer. Money could not bribe him to attempt it, even privately, for fear of the priests ; so that Dr. Young returned to his dead almost distracted. The account- runs that a kind-hearted gentleman came to advise with him, and they arranged to make up the body into the smallest parcel possible, and after midnight, when all had retired, they bore the precious burden between them, and, leaving the road, found a plowed field, where they dug such a grave as they were able and laid the loved one to her rest. The doctor has memorial ized the event in his Night Thoughts : " While nature yearned blind superstition raved, That mourned the dead, and this denied a grave." Surely here is evidence in the pope's own words, as well as the facts of history, justifying the sad conclusion that Roman ism is unchangeable, that the cruelty she has inflicted upon humanity, living and dead, she would repeat if she only had the power again to exercise it, and that therefore she cannot be trusted. Napoleon's increased army now advanced to open the way for the Austrian archduke, and the Mexican president and Con gress, unable to offer an adequate resistance, were compelled to retire from Mexico city. The Congress dispersed, but before doing so they invested the president with what is called in n 162 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. Mexico " ample faculties," giving him their unlimited confi dence, and the use of all the available resources of the nation in the great task of carrying on the conflict for the freedom of Mexico. Thirty days after the return of peace the Congress was to convene and receive the report of the use made of ' this power. How wonderful the scene when the legislature transferred its authority to the discretion of this incorruptible patriot! The sublime faith and devotion to the cause embodied in the Constitution which he drew up in 1857 displayed by this distinguished man is a most remarkable fact in the history of freedom. With the army of a foreign despot threatening his capital and his navy bombarding the coast cities to force a for eign monarch on the nation ; with domestic treason, led by men \ called ministers of the Most High ; with forces scattered, few in number and deficient in resources ; with foes to misrepresent the truth in other lands and with none to help, yet this good \ \ Republican president faints not. There is only one man with '; whom to compare him — Lincoln; and they are worthy to be associated in honor together. The address of Bishop Simpson, able, affectionate, and excellent as it was, at the funeral of our martyred president, contained nothing more not able than the quotation that the orator made from one of Mr. Lincoln's speeches, uttered in 1859 (four years before these events in Mexico), in which, speaking of the slave power, he said : " Broken by it, I, too, may be ; bow to it, I never will. The probability that we may fail in the strug gle ought not to deter us from the support of a cause which I deem to be just, and it shall not deter me. If ever I feel the soul within me elevate and expand to those dimensions not wholly unworthy of its Almighty architect, it is when I contemplate the cause of my country, deserted by all the world besides, and I, standing up boldly and alone, and hurling de fiance at her victorious oppressors. Here, without contemplating conse quences, before high Heaven and in the face of the world, I swear eternal fidelity to the just cause, as I deem it, of the land of my life, my liberty, and my love." No inspiration finer than this breathes in any of Mr. Lincoln's utterances. It almost seems as if an intimation of his life and death were given to him at the moment, as if a glimpse into his own and his country's future had been vouchsafed to his excited vision.* * Holland's Life of Lincoln, p. 534. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 163 Every word here could have been adopted by Juarez as his own in his struggle with clerical despotism. How wonderful the providence that raised up two such men, living and acting side by side, taking the same risks for the same cause, enduring this during the same eventful decade, 1860 to 1870, thinking not of themselves, but of that " vision of their country's future," by that God-given glimpse vouchsafed to each of them, now so fully realized by their grateful countrymen and by those who love liberty in every laud ! Juarez and his cabinet sought safety in the Northern States of the republic while they were developing the resources of their country and preparing their plan of resistance in the hope of ultimate victory over all this Avrong. The States of Cen tral and South America took the alarm to heart very seriously. They hastened to communicate with the Mexican president, to assure him of their detestation of Louis Napoleon's treason to freedom, and that they held the cause of Mexico as their cause, and it should have their abundant sympathy, while they would forever honor the man who so worthily bore the banner of con stitutional freedom for the New World, as he was doing. We have not room for their utterances which came to cheer Juarez in that anxious hour, and can only briefly refer to them. The president of Pern, in his address to the Congress at Lima, closed with these stirring words : No ; the republics of the New World, from Hudson's Bay to Tierra del Fuego, are and will be free, independent, and sovereign ; because such is their will — it accords with their democratic instincts and most profound convictions ; and because in America monarchy is an impossibility. Mexico responds with her friendship and sympathy to that which Peru displays and demonstrates for her. The Argentine Republic, Chili, Bolivia, Nicaragua, the United States of Colombia, and others followed, adding their protest against the French invasion. Under all the circumstances they regarded our own United States as within the circle of dan ger should Mexico fall before the remorseless power which had 164 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. already its grip upon her life, and which led the venerable Masquera, then President of New Granada, to say to his own Congress, " If the United States fails we all go under." Well he might say so, in view of the fact (among many other things then taking form) that when Peru proposed that " league for mutual protection," and it was being discussed, it was credi bly reported that the minister of Napoleon at Bogota remarked to the minister of Ecuador that "France would not allow such a league to be formed ! " * So the pressure first was to fall on Mexico, but the others correctly understood that that was but the entering wedge to more destructive results, and that thus Mexico was not merely struggling for the rights and freedom " which affect all America," as the address of the United States of Colombia declared, but on a broader and higher scale even than this, as Abbott remarks, like Washington and the found ers of our republic " she was struggling not for herself and America alone, but was in a sense fighting Fbeedom's Battle for all mankind and for posterity." The eyes of the world were already drawn toward Mexico, and true lovers of constitutional liberty on the other side of the Atlantic were yielding their sympathy and prayers for her suc cess in the unequal conflict. In a document drawn up by the "Netherlands League," a Democratic association at the very home of Carlota, were the following expressions, sent to Presi dent Juarez by Senor Romero: We address you as the only legal representative of the Mexican nations, to congratulate you on y%our persevering resistance against a foreign usurper, who is trying to rob the Mexicans of their liberty and independence. . . . The sixteen hundred young men who left Belgium for Mexico were made to believe that they were going solely to serve as a guard to the so- called Empress of Mexico, daughter of the King of the Belgians, and these men, thus deceived, continued to enlist without reflecting that they were going to uphold principles of tyranny and oppression. The people of Belgium are lovers of liberty, and the independence they want for them selves they desire for other nations. * Christian World, vol. xvi, 1865, p. 136. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 165 The hour had now come for the United States to take their position so as to justify their future course, whatever that might be. Mr. Seward wrote on the 7th of April, 1864, to our minis ter at Paris, for the information of the French government : A resolution passed the House of Representatives by a unanimous vote, which declares the opposition of that body to a recognition of a monarchy in Mexico. He adds in his letter to the minister these decisive words: "I remain now Arm as heretofore in the opinion that the destinies of the American continent are not to be permanently controlled by any political arrangement that can be made in the capitals of Europe." At the same time, in response to a dispatch in which Napo leon assumed great frankness, while really concealing his pur pose toward Mexico, Mr. Seward stated our position : While I appreciate the frankness and the good-will which the emperor's government manifests in thus communicating its views and purposes on the subject, it nevertheless remains my duty to say that this government has long recognized and does continue to recognize the constitutional government of the United States of Mexico as the sovereign authority in that country, and the president, Benito Juarez, as its chief. This govern ment at the same time recognizes the condition of war existing in Mexico between that country and France. We maintain absolute neutrality be tween the belligerents.* Our present duty was done when President Lincoln laid before Congress, a few days after, the views of the administration in regard to Mexico, expressed with his usual candor. Napoleon might dissemble as he chose, but henceforth he knew what to expect from the United States in regard to Mexico. As President Juarez passed out of the northern end of the valley of Anahuac the vanguard of the French despot entered at the southern, coming to dictate in the New World what style of government he would allow here, and what measure of civil and religious liberty we must give up, and what we might retain, conformably to papal dictation ! The president fixed his government at San Luis Potosi, Chi huahua, and El Paso alternately. So well was he served by his faithful people that, though the clerical faction would have 166 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. given " large money " to any one who would have betrayed him into their hands (and they would probably have given him but a short shrift), yet he was preserved from all plots, to carry on his great work, until his cause was triumphant in Mexico. After his departure from the capital, and until the Austrian archduke should arrive, an interregnum government was arranged by a regency of three persons, of whom Archbishop Labastida was one. This domineering prelate was in his element, and soon tried to introduce reactionary and repressive measures. He could not wait till the prince arrived and had the opportunity to approve what was now done in his name. The insolent course of this ecclesiastic soon brought him into conflict with Marshal Neigre, who commanded the French forces. The archbishop was not disposed to relax one iota of the Church's claims on the confiscated property, but demanded that the sales should be declared " null and void," though they had been effected legally under the preceding regimen ; but he cared nothing for the laws of the Congress, and considered a simple decree of the regency sufficient to restore all the properties, no matter whose interests were violated. The marshal expostulated, and reminded the prelate that such action did not become him who had so lately been sheltered at the French court and had been brought back under the protection of the French flag. He considered the archbishop's course so compromising and premature that he raised the question whether an appeal to the pope " against this retrograde spirit of the higher Mexican clergy would not be successful and the archbishop suppressed." The heavier storm, however, came when the marshal requested the archbishop to indicate which of the unused churches at the capital might be taken as a place of worship for such of his soldiers as were Protestants. His own government made such provision, and furnished chaplains for them, and they expected the same privilege in Mexico. The wrath of the archbishop was extreme when the marshal preferred his reasonable request, without dreaming of being refused. What followed we will state in the language of Chevalier, a French writer, who, though MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 167 a Romanist, seems to have been as much surprised at the prel ate's violence and intolerance as was the marshal : The Archbishop of Mexico, forgetting not only what he owed to France, but also the services that the French Intervention was rendering to Mex ico and to Catholicism, was eager to create a sensation. He resigned his functions as a member of the provisional government, he issued a protest, and a little later he distributed papers among the faithful, in which, accord ing to the terms of a letter addressed to this high church dignitary by Gen eral Neigre, "appeal was made to the most detestable passions against the army of his majesty the emperor." The circumstances of the case were such that the general thought it his duty to address these severe words to the archbishop. "Tell that party, monseigneur, that we are watching them and are aware of their plots. Tell them that though it is always re pugnant to us to employ violent measures of repression we shall yet, should circumstances make the painful duty incumbent, know how to thrust back the real enemies of Mexico into the obscurity from which they dare to issue their diatribes."* Alas ! General Neigre forgot he was not in enlightened Europe, but in Mexico, so long oppressed, and that this wicked prelate was trying to drag the nation back into the darkness from which she had so lately emerged, and that in doing this he was obey ing the will of the pontiff, to whom they dreamed of appealing against his acts. What a lesson unfolds itself in this interfer ence of the marshal and its results as to the burden which had so long oppressed Mexico ! All things being now ready, Maximilian went to Rome to re ceive the papal benediction. Pius IX. was flattered by this act. It recalled the customs of the Middle Ages, and the most was made of the example ; but it has had no imitators, and how much good the pontifical benediction did this " crowned adventurer," as some one then called him, we shall see. Maximilian received the full assurance of " perpetuity to his dynasty," and the "blessing of Heaven upon his enterprise" from the pontiff, who claimed that, as God's vicegerent, he was the only authority on earth which could originate a new dynasty by " divine right " and transmit to it Heaven's indorsement. The entire clerical * Mexico, Ancient and Modern, by M. Chevalier, 1864, p. 10. 168 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. party seconded this assurance. How grim this appears now, and what a fearful mistake this " infallible " man made in regard to this new Catholic empire and its perpetuity ! Pius IX. did a large amount of blessing and cursing in his time. Some curious lists were made up to illustrate how often and how completely Providence reversed his benedictions and his anathemas until men became so indifferent that they neither desired the one nor feared the other, and especially after the overwhelming disaster that followed his benediction upon Maximilian and his empire ! Of God alone, as the omniscient Judge of men, can the words of the heathen king of Moab to Balaam be true : " I know that he whom thou blessest is blessed, and he whom thou cursest is cursed." The exercise of these prerogatives God has never con ferred on mortal man, not even on this one who set up his claim to be " supreme judge of Christendom ! " Even though thus fortified there is evidence that Maximilian was not quite assured that his empire would be altogether safe. Before leaving Miramar he exacted a guarantee from Louis Na poleon, pledging the power of France to " keep the new throne secure." What power on this continent could Maximilian be anx ious about save the United States ? Already Napoleon's minister, M. Billant, had begun in the French Parliament to dilate on the benefits which his master's policy was to confer upon this hem isphere. He intimated that when the emperor had succeeded in giving " a good government " to Mexico he might then extend his benevolence " over the other disorderly republics of the New World." And it was noted that M. Billant in this connection made no exception of the United States.* Senor Romero, the Mexican embassador, had full evidence in his possession for his belief that Napoleon had unfriendly intentions against our country. This he placed before Mr. Seward and President Lin coln. When our hands were tied on account of our civil war Napoleon hastened the Intervention in Mexico, and undoubtedly stood prepared to utilize his chances, whatever they might be, to our disadvantage. * Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States, 1863, pp. 63, 310, 444. MAXIMILIAN, ARCHDUKE OP AUSTRIA, For three years, by usurpation, " Emperor " of Mexico. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 169 The church party made great preparations to receive Maxi milian and Carlota at Vera Cruz, and on the 12th of June, 1864, they made their formal entry into the city of Mexico, and were escorted with great pomp to the cathedral, where they were enthroned. The great building was decorated, and under the direction of Archbishop Labastida all that was possible was done to show popular jubilation. Mr. Flint gives a very full account of what was said and done, and evidently leaves nothing out in his zeal to mark their welcome to the capital and to create the impression that Maximilian was received in a great blaze of popularity. How much of this was spontaneous and outside of clerical manipulation this partisan does not state, but the further part of this narrative will show. We here present this now imperial couple to our readers. The pictures are from photographs taken at Trieste, when on their way to sail for Mexico. The prince, or emperor, as we must now begin to call him, came well equipped to set up a gorgeous court before the Mex icans. Among other costly articles he had brought a gaudy state carriage, so rich with gold trimmings, plate-glass, and other trappings, after the old French style, that it was a load for four horses to draw, and is reported to have cost $47,000. Tourists go to see this curiosity, and also rooms full, until lately, of fur niture and other luxurious articles, all bearing the imperial monogram. Few of them came into use and some were never unpacked ! Sad reminders of vanities and glories provided at an immense cost ! Colonel Evans gives five pages to an enumer ation of these frivolities with which the poor emperor provided himself, which those curious in such matters can consult. What intensifies the foolishness of the prince who was tjius led to emulate the court spendors of Napoleon III. was the fact that they were provided with borrowed money, much of which was never paid, and never will be ! Maximilian himself was com paratively poor, and had only a small patrimony. These thou sands thus vaingloriously squandered in advance could have been taken only from that ill-starred Mexican Loan in Europe 170 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. into which Napoleon had led him. Thus Maximilian lands in the country which he invades at the head of a foreign army, and, before he can realize a dollar from taxation or from her customs, fastens round her neck bonds which demand millions for their discharge, but for not one cent of which could the poor suffering nation be fairly and honestly held accountable in any court on earth. Nor is this all, nor even the worst of the financial wretchedness he brings to load her down in helpless ness and long years of future misery. How is his costly court and administration and this reckless war he wages to be sus tained by her ? This question was thoroughly examined by a competent Mexican statist, Senor Francisco Zarco, of Saltillo. The entire paper lies before us, but we have only room for his exhibit for the yearly demand and his conclusion upon it. After showing that the new empire had to begin its life with a debt of its own of $26,580,000 he comes to the question of the annual expense sanctioned (including interest on the $40,000,000 of the loan taken in Paris, Brussels, Hamburg, and Amsterdam), and de velops the following table as the result to be met when the first year ends : International obligations $12,781,000 Interest on the home debt 1,200,000 The emperor's salary 1,500,000 Appropriation for the empress 100,000 Expenses of the imperial household 100,000 Worship and clergy, at least 5,000,000 The army, 40,000 men, same pay as French 8,000,000 Civil list, pensions, rewards, annuities, and secret service fund 8,000,000 A total annual expense of $36,681,000 While Maximilian is perfecting this prodigious invention the empire would have to suffer a deficit of $20,681,000 in the second year of its estab lishment, as the revenue could not be more then than $16,000,000 annu ally, considering the state of war and other serious obstacles. How was this deficiency, threatening to increase, too, from year to year, to be sup plied? That is the question. It is the death of the empire in its cradle ! CARLOTA, ARCHDUCHESS OF AUSTRIA, and " Empress" of Mexico. MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 171 Sefior Zarco pauses here to realize how Prince Maximilian, with his eyes open, could have been led into such a hopeless and helpless enterprise as this ; and then, recalling the archduke's amazing confidence in the pope's blessings and in Napoleon's deceptive assurance that he " was going to seat him on piles of gold and silver instead of on a throne," Zarco laconically winds up his review of the doubtful situation with this remark : The pope's precious blessings may do well for eternal life, or help to make a passage through purgatory shorter, but nobody ever made a pot- pie out of them. . . . Sad will be the archduke's waking, when his frolic is over, and, looking for the promised "piles of gold and silver," sees only his poor wife's dressing-table.* In confirmation of the accuracy of Sefior Zarco's estimate it is well to note that the same ground was gone over in the fol lowing year by Mr. Middleton, secretary of the British Lega tion in Mexico, fully sustaining what Senor Zarco had antici- pated.f No wonder that Louis Napoleon's minister of finance declined to make France responsible for so much, or that Francis Joseph refused to have part in such transactions, or that so early there arose the talk of " taking material guarantees," or even the proposals for " the sale of the border States of the empire, with the Juarists thrown in as chattels." Who could be the purchasers ? The United States did not desire an extension of territory ; the Confederate States could not afford such luxuries, and France was not in condition to claim Sonora or Tehuantepec, much as she desired them, in satisfaction of the Miramar contract ! Sad and distracting as all this was there lay before the unfort unate emperor a more difficult duty to his employers, through which he was expected to go without shrinking so as to carry it to its full consummation. The clericals had laid out the work, and the pope had accepted the arrangement. Maximilian had no alternative, nor was he to be allowed any modification of * Diplomatic Correspondence of the United States, 1864, p. 518. La Accion, June 18, 1864. f Papers Relating to Foreign Affairs of the United States, 1866, part ii. 172 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. its execution. Those whose work he was to do laughed at hi& modern notions of a " limited monarchy " and " constitutional sovereignty." " The allocution of the holy father " against Mexico (already presented to our readers) was placed before him as his guide. It bitterly condemns the laws passed under the famous Constitution drafted by Juarez, and declares all the acts done under it to be " condemned, disallowed, and absolutely null and void, and of no effect ! " The people, the Congress, and the government are sternly required to bow down before the demands of the pope and to surrender all that they had won, under the threat of " the penalties and censures of the holy see." Maximilian was to build up by its terms a model Romish State for this continent ! At first he tried to conciliate the hierarchy, choosing the members of his cabinet from among the Conservatives, and endeavored to subjugate the national affairs to the papal will. Let us now turn our attention to the broader facts of the Intervention now so fully launched in Mexico. It had more than armies in the field and navies on the ocean for the accom plishment of its purposes. It had its trained writers and pamphleteers, for the manufacturing of public opinion, sta tioned in New York and in the leading cities of Europe. All that related to the Intervention was put in the most flattering aspects, and the republic was misrepresented in a detestable manner, calculated to bring down the curse of " the God of truth " upon those who sought their objects by such means. The man who occupied a prominent position among the calum niators of the republic, and the special eulogist of the empire, has already been introduced to our readers. The Abbe Em manuel Domenech bore the title of " Senior Director of the Press of the Cabinet of his Majesty the Emperor Maximilian," and was so appointed by Napoleon for very special service. He thus occupied a position between two thrones, was informed concerning all that passed, and had immense influence in mold ing public opinion in Europe in regard to the Mexican question. His whole heart was given to the work of representing unfa- MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 173 vorably the character of the Mexican Liberals and to building up on this continent the European system of government, with its civil and religious despotism. In his volume, Mexico As It Is, he distinctly avows that the object of Napoleon in the Intervention was to checkmate the United States. Our trans formation was to be accomplished by overthrowing the Monroe doctrine, and by "giving to the Latin race a career on this continent." That career was to change the republics of Central and Sonth America into monarchies, and thus open the way to monarchize us. We will quote his words : If monarchy should be successfully introduced into the Spanish repub lics, in ten years the United States would themselves declare a dictator ship, which is a kind of republican monarchy adopted by degenerate or too revolutionary republics. (P. 226.) He next asserts that the settled policy of the United States was to appropriate Mexico as their own, and then the rest of the continent. He adds : In starting with the principle, which is now a fact, that the American continent is the common property of the human race, and not of the shat tered union of a single race, without title or right, at least to Spanish America and the Latin race, mother of all civilization, it evidently follows that the principle of the protection of Europe, at least in the seventeen republican States of South America, belongs to us (the French) and to all the powers of the Old World. We must protect the Latin race, and in order to protect it we must first take possession of the point menaced by the United States. (P. 230.) This is the policy indicated by Napoleon's words on another occasion, when he said, "My object is to assure the preponder ance of France over the Latin races, and to augment the influence of those races in America." * Domenech then adds : It would have been good policy to have recognized the Southern Con federacy, in order to make the work of intervention more speedy. (P. 240.) While several times too he declares : The Intervention was a grand and glorious undertaking, which prom ised to be for France the crowning glory of the reign of Napoleon III., and * Mackenzie, p.- 53. 174 MEXICO IN TRANSITION. for Europe and the world the grandest enterprise of the nineteenth cent ury. (P. 223.) These assertions were written after the utter failure of the In-, tervention, when the French had left Mexico, and this "Senior Director of the Press of the Cabinet of his Majesty the Em peror of Mexico " was trying to account for the overthrow of all these grand plans of his master, and felt so exasperated against Mr. Seward's diplomacy and the moral support which the United States had given to Mexico in her struggle. He knew far more than he chooses to tell us ; but as he sits there, so disap pointed and so disconsolate, with the ruins of their " empire " around him, the Confederacy collapsed and the United States right before him now more powerful and glorious than ever, we can well enough understand what he means when he writes this closing paragraph and says : Behind the Mexican expedition there was more than an empire to found, a nation to save, markets to create, thousands of millions to develop; there was a world tributary to France, happy to submit to our sympa thetic influence, to receive their supplies from us, and to ascribe to us their resurrection to the political and social life of civilized people. (P. 242.) Yes, indeed, behind the Mexican expedition there was more to be accomplished than he here enumerates. He does not state what or how much more, but it is no longer difficult to surmise the rest, after these admissions of this deeply disap pointed priest and the side lights that we now have from so many other quarters. The wicked conspiracy stands clearly revealed. How blind to the teachings of history must have been this man ! The Latin and the Teutonic races had been struggling for supremacy for generations on the European continent, and such battle-fields as Sadowa and Gravelotte had given the ascendency to Teuton civilization, and that of Sedan soon after consummated the great change. Three hundred years ago the Latin race held the wealth of the world in its possession, with MEXICO IN TRANSITION. 175 all that that wealth could command, and the fairest and most fruitful realms of earth as its own, to show what it could do for humanity. Refusing the blessings conferred by the Refor mation and the open Bible, it bowed to papal despotism, and now the result shows Italy, Spain, Mexico, and South America far behind Protestant nations in enterprise, intelligence, indus try, and virtue ! Yet this enemy of constitutional freedom was vain enough to imagine that he conld dazzle the world by holding up the ignis fatuus of " Latin civilization " as something to be preferred to Protestant and Christian freedom at the close of the nine teenth century. His folly provoked extensive examinations into national statistics covering such questions as those of illiteracy, crime, legitimacy, and prosperity, which were tabulated and published, presenting comparisons as to the respective results of the two systems of civilization. These various exhibits lie be fore us, but leaving those which present the sad results of Latin civilization in regard to all the other points, we take up the one that deals with illiteracy and present it for the consideration of our readers. Eight countries of each civilization, aggregat ing each other closely in population, etc., are here compared.* What a lesson do these tables teach ! ILLITERACY 01" LATIN AND TEUTONIC POPULATIONS. ROMAN CATHOLIC COUNTRIES. LATIN. Venezuela Austria-Hungary, France Brazil Spain Portugal Belgium Italy Total Average A o