DIVINITY SCHOOL TROWBRIDGE LIBRARY GIFT OF Mrs. Richmond Curtiss %fy Hfetotfcal TBible THE WORK AND TEACHINGS OF THE APOSTLES BY PROF. CHARLES FOSTER KENT THE SHORTER BIBLE —THE OLD TESTA MENT. THE SOCIAL TEACHINGS OP THE PROPH ETS AND JESUS. BIBLICAL GEOGRAPHY AND HISTORY. THE ORIGIN AND PERMANENT VALUE OF THE OLD TESTAMENT. HISTORY OF THE HEBREW PEOPLE. From the Settlement in Canaan to the FaU of Jerusalem in 586 B.C. 2 vols. HISTORY OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE. The Babylonian. Persian and Greek Periods. THE HISTORICAL BIBLE. With Maps. 6 vols. STUDENT'S OLD TESTAMENT. Logically and Chronologically Arranged and Trans lated. With Maps. 6 vols. THE MESSAGES OF ISRAEL'S LAW GIVERS. THE MESSAGES OF THE EARLIER PROPHETS. THE MESSAGES OF THE LATER PROPH ETS. CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS 15" 20° : T r S S/B i£aao N r/\ &te, E^fentym Sinus Tarentinua K'i o drun (K(N l{X^hil| N *» \BeroeaJ Larisa iifemetrias ¦xmm LEMNOS '°<3,\4@->u?Psacl3 \ pru » ¦ - - w ¦^?- e^iu VoseyHA fW+Wtt /Sw^ Laodiceia>| "Tav^rn...--^.,™ alic^nassu>sy/.°SSr*%S<^?S*T'1J,'V' / j&& THE Main Highways OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE AND THE Scenes of Paul's Work SCALE OF MILES ape Salmons E R Ptolemaia/ Cyrene CYEENAICA •^ r C I Was P*y^„ -eMSffi«i ^w^CYPRUSj, (tripdi^ o Sidb ft? Tyr4 ptolemaM * Caesare* _ 3op« ft Al4xASB««j fp^lusium E G Y PV 15" Longitude u s ?Hellopolis L.L. PQAT6B, ENQ. CO\, N.Y. Greenwich S5° Cte lijistotical "Bible THE WORK AND TEACHINGS OF THE APOSTLES BY CHARLES FOSTER KENT, Ph.D., Litt.D. WOOLSEY PROFESSOR OF BZBLZCAL LITERATURE IN YALB UNIVERSITY WITH MAP AND CHART CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS NEW YORK CHICAGO BOSTON COPTEIGHT, 1916, BT CHARLES SCRIBNER'S SONS PREFACE The Apostolic Age is the most complex period of biblical history. Until the death of Jesus the interest of the biblical student is focused on the Hebrew race, but after that great turning-point in human his tory it suddenly becomes world-wide. Rome soon takes the place of Jerusalem as the centre of Christianity, and its historical background is the great Graeco-Roman world. It is during the Apostolic Age that the relatively narrow current of Jewish thought mingles with those which flow from the ancient East, from cultured Hellas, and from Rome itself. The mingling of these currents explains the resulting complexity of apostolic life and thought. The New Testament writ ings vividly reflect this mingling of civilizations and ideas. As they stand these books also lack chronological arrangement. To most New Testament readers the latter part of the New Testament is a labyrinth. It is full of immortal truths and richly suggestive of the heroism and hopes of the early Christians; but, aside from the book of Acts, the New Testament writings in their present order fail to make clear the unity of the mighty, onward, first-century movement of which they are practically the only record. Therefore a chronological synthesis of the material in the epistles and Acts is an indispensable prerequisite for the intelligent study of apostolic Christianity. The cumulative testimony of an ever-increasing body of biblical students confirms the conclusion that the most fruitful, in fact, the only satisfactory way to study biblical history and the complex litera ture contained in the Old and New Testaments, is by means of the source-method. When the more important passages of this ancient literature are singled out and arranged according to the scientific methods of classification, the biblical writers tell their own story and the modern student gains for the first time a clear and comprehensive knowledge of the abounding life and the vital principles recorded in the Bible. In endeavoring to lay the foundations for this study, I have been constantly helped and inspired, not only by work in the college classroom, but also by scores and hundreds of letters from men and women in various professions and activities who have been able PREFACE to speak from their practical experience in the larger laboratory of life. To endeavor to lay before them in each succeeding period those portions of the Bible that are the most significant and to leave out none that are of primary importance has been one of the constant aims of this series. In the present volume the task has been especially dif ficult, yet inspiring because of the richness of the material. In Paul's epistles the historian also possesses contemporary records which are of priceless value; but even here frequent omissions bring out in clearer relief the remaining passages which present the logical thought and the essential teachings of the great apostle to the Gentiles. Following the example of modern translators like Moffatt and Weymouth, I have broken up many of Paul's cumbersome and involved sentences into smaller and more intelligible units. By so doing the modern reader is enabled to gain a truer appreciation, not only of the apos tle's thought but also of his vigorous literary style. The large debt which I owe to the writers who have pioneered this many-sided field is suggested in the Appendix. To my former student, Professor Case, of the University of Chicago, I feel under especial obligation for his illuminating survey of the religious background of the Apostolic Age in his Evolution cf Christianity. The study of each succeeding period of biblical history has also brought into increasing prominence the lofty yet practical social idealism of the men who in spired and wrote the Old and New Testaments. The subject is too large and too vital to be presented only fragmentarily. Its com prehensive treatment is, therefore, reserved for a separate volume on "The Social Teachings of the Prophets and Jesus." C. F. K. Yale University, January, 1916. VI CONTENTS INTRODUCTION THE RECORDS AND BACKGROUND OF THE APOSTOLIC AGE PAQB I. The Records of the Work and Teachings of the Apos tles 1 I. The Significance of the Apostolic Age. — II. The New Testament Letters and Epistles. — III. The Aim of the Book of Acts. — IV. Its Authorship and Date. — V. The Early Sources Quoted in Acts 1*-15M. — VI. Later Traditions in 1>-15». — VII. The Journal of Travel. H. The Historical and Religious Background of the Apostolic Age 9 I. The Rulers of Rome. — II. What" Rome Did for Chris tianity. — III. Contemporary Palestinian Judaism. — IV. The Judaism of the Dispersion. — V. The Greek Philosophies. — VI. The Emperor-Worship. — VII. The Mystery-Relig ions. — VIII. The Religious and Social Needs of the Masses in the Roman Empire. PRIMITIVE CHRISTIANITY IN PALESTINE AND SYRIA §CXLVI. The Origin of the Jerusalem Christian Com munity 21 Acts li3-». s"-25, 2l> *• *• 6a' 12-41. I. The Return of the Disciples to Jerusalem. — II. The Choice of a Successor to Judas. — III. The Story of the Day of Pentecost. — IV. The Coming of the Spirit. — V. Peter s Memorable Sermon. — VI. The Faith of the Early Chris tian Believers. § CXLVII. The Life of the Primitive Christian Com munity 34 Acts 2"-4"- »-*• *"-", 5'-". I. The Historical Record. — II. The Healing of the Lame Beggar. — III. Peter's Interpretation of the Old Testament Prophecies. — IV. His Defense before Jesus' Murderers. — V. The Effect of the Release of Peter and John upon the Christian Community. — VI The Communistic Tendencies of the Believers. — VII. The Story of Ananias and Sapphlra. — VIII. The Religious Life of the Jerusalem Christians. vii CONTENTS § CXLVIII. The Work and Death of Stephen 45 Acts B'-T- «*¦">. 8«. I. The Story of Stephen's Martyrdom. — II. The Appointment of theSeven. — III. Stephen's Discussions with the Hellenistic jews, — iv. The Logic of Stephen's Speech. — V. His Death. §CXLIX. The Expansion of Christianity after the Death of Stephen 54 Acts 8">. *-*», ii". »• *•¦ Mb. 121-". I. The Far-Reaching Effects of Stephen's Martyrdom. — II. The Samaritan Field. — III. The Results of Philip's Preach ing in Samaria. — IV. His Conversation with the Ethiopian Eunuch. — V. The Spread of Christianity to Antioch.— VI. The Persecution of the Jerusalem Christians by Herod Agrippa I. — VII. Peter's Changed Attitude Toward the Gentiles. — VIII. The Limitations and Significance of Early Palestinian Christianity. PAUL'S WORK AND TEACHINGS § CL. Paul's Early Training and Conversion 68 Acts 22», Gal. 1". «, Acts 26"-™ Gal. 1"-", Acts 26»\ II Cor. 11"". ". Gal. 1"-". I. Paul's Inheritance. — II. His Personality. — III. His Early Environment at Tarsus. — IV. His Training at Jerusalem. — V. His Zeal as a Persecutor. — VI. The Four Accounts of His Conversion. — VII. His Transforming Psychological Experi ence. — VIII. His First Fifteen Years of Missionary Activity. § CLI. Paul's First Missionary Campaign 80 Acts 12a- rf, ll"-s», 1225, 13>-14!». I. Paul's Work at Antioch. — II. The Sending Forth of Bar nabas and Paul. — III. Their Work in Cyprus. — IV. The Mission Field in Southern Asia Minor. — V. At Galatian Antioch. — VI. The Apostles' Work at Iconium^and Lystra. § CLII. The Breaking of Jewish Bonds 91 Gal. 2i-«, Acts 15i-«. I. The Burning Problem in the Christian Church. — II. The Accounts of the Way in Which It Was Solved. — III. Paul's Interview with the Pillars" at Jerusalem. — IV. Problems Arising from the Association of Jewish and Gentile Chris tians. — V. Paul's Controversy with Peter. — VI. The Sig nificance of the Breaking of Jewish Bonds. §CLIII. Paul's Second Visit and Later Letter to the Churches of Galatia. 100 Acts 15»-16», Gal. l>-», 3'-'. »»-«», 4«-«, 5*-«. «-6«. I. Date and Aim of Paul's Second Missionary Campaign. — II. Revisiting the Galatian Churches. — III. The Occasion viii CONTENTS PAGB of Paul's Letter to the Galatians. — TV. The Literary Struc ture and Contents of Galatians. — V. Paul's Interpretation of the Significance of the Jewish Law and of the Work of Jesus. —VI. The Responsibilities of Spiritual Liberty. § CLIV. Paul's Missionary Work in Macedonia 109 Acts 16«-17". I. Paul's Quest of a New Mission Field. — II. His Vision at Troas.— Ill His Work at Philippi.— IV. The Founding of the Church at Thessalonica. — V. Paul's Work at Beroea. — VI. The Results of His Work in Macedonia. § CLV. Paul's Letters to the Christians at Thessalonica 119 I Thess. li-«, 2'S^. "-»», II Thess. 1", 2i-', 3. I. The General Structure of Paul's Letters. — II. Their Literary Characteristics. — III. The Occasion of His First Letter to the Thessalonians. — IV. Its Contents. — V. The Contents and Authenticity of II Thessalonians. — VI. Paul's Aim hi n Thessalonians. § CLVI. Paul's Work at Athens and Corinth 132 Acts I7»«-18«». I. The Athens of Paul's Day. — II. His Attitude Toward Its Intellectual and Religious Life. — III. His Address to the Athenian Crowd. — IV. His Skill as an Orator. — V. His Problems and Methods at Corinth. — VI. The Results of His Work in Corinth. § CLVH. Paul's Correspondence with the Corinthian Church 142 I Cor. I1-*. io-i7». 2i-»( 21-5. "-18, 31-7' 9-n. w. 17' 2i-M, 48— 5«a. »-u( 1512-23, 36-38, 42-44, 49-58, 161"7- lo'-14, II Cor. IO1"6 ll1-8 1214» iB 132-5, l1-*- a. 2i-i°«, 611-13, 72-*, 81-*, 91- 2» "-16. I. Conditions in the Church at Corinth that Called Forth Paul's Letters. — II. His First Letter to the Corinthian Christians. — III. His Second Letter to the Corinthians. — IV. His Third Letter to the Corinthians. — V. His Fourth Letter to the Corinthians. § CLV 111. Paul's Principles of Christian Living 156 I Cor. 6, 7i»-M, s1-*- '-». W, ia, 913-27, 10". «. »i-», 12"-», 13>-14s. ¦* 18, 19, 28-33* , 37-40, I. Paul's Teaching Regarding the Christian's Duty in His Economic Relations. — II. His Advice Regarding Sex Ques tions and Divorce. — III. His Practical Application of Jesus' Law of Love. — IV. "The Body of Christ. ' — V. Paul's Im mortal Hymn in Praise of Love. § CLIX. Paul's Ministry at Ephesus 168 Acts 18i«-20". I. Paul's Journey to Syria. — II. The PoHtical and Religious Importance of Ephesus. — III. Conditions that Confronted Paul at Ephesus. — IV. His Method of Work at Ephesus. — V. His Conflict with the Pagan Cults. — VI. The Results of His Work at Ephesus. ix CONTENTS § CLX. Paul's Interpretation of Jesus' Saving Work 179 Romans 1>. 6-a, 2'-", 3»-12. 2°-81, 4u-i7i>, 5'-", 8, ll«-«. I. Date and Aim of Paul's Epistle to the Romans. — II. Its Structure. — III. Paul's Estimate of the Jewish Law. — IV. The Influences which Shaped His Conception of Jesus. — V. His Doctrine of Salvation through Faith in Christ. § CLXI. Paul's Social Teachings 190 Romans 121-14", 151-'. »>>-". I. The Two Sides of Paul's Personality and Teaching. — II. His Reassertion of Jesus' Social Teachings. — III. His Restatement of Jesus' Social Ideal. — IV. The Christian's Responsibility as a Member of Society. — V. His Duties of Toleration and Consideration for Others. — VI. His Obliga tion to Men of All Races. § CLXII. Paul's Last Journey to Jerusalem 200 Acts 21i-*°, 22a-23a». »-»». »-». I. The Record of Paul's Journey to Jerusalem and Rome. — II. His Reasons for Revisiting Jerusalem. — III His Recep tion at Jerusalem. — IV. The Jewish Attack. — V. The Re sults of Paul's Visit to Jerusalem. § CLXIII. The Ambassador in Bonds 210 Acts 24>-25u. a, 261-*. »-28». ". «. I. Paul's Imprisonment under Felix. — II. The Date of the Procuratorships of Felix and Festus. — III. Paul's Reasons for Appealing to Csesar. — IV. The Story of His Shipwreck. — V. His Journey to Rome. — VI. The End of the Race. § CLXIV. The Last Letters of the Aged Prisoner 223 Philemon, Col. l>-«. «-2', 2i-«. *¦", 3>. 2. •-2>, 47-». ". ¦«, Eph. V-*, 2H-18, 44-4, 11-18, 31. 82, 51, 2 QlD-24 Phil, Il-" 19"28 4*"20. I. Paul's Last Letters. — II. The Occasion of His Letter to Philemon. — III. The Purpose and Thought of His Epistle to the Colossians. — IV. The Identity of the So-called "Epis tle to the Ephesians." — V. Paul's Love-Letter to the Phi lippians. — VI. His Contributions to Christianity. CHRISTIANITY DURING THE SECOND HALF OF THE FIRST CENTURY § CLXV. The Message of Hope and Inspiration in I Peter 238 I Peter li-». «. », 2i-». »-», 31-ie, 41-8, 7-n, 5. I. The Later Years of the Apostle Peter. — II. His Martyr dom. — III. The Growth of the Western Church. — IV. The Persecution of the Christians by Domitian. — V. The Aim and Contents of I Peter. — VI. Its Authorship and Date. CONTENTS PAGE § CLXVI. The Early Christian Sermon in Hebrews 250 Heb. II*8- 1°-12, 21°. H. 17. 18, 31-7, 414-18, l()19-24. 32-88, m-10. 17-12, 23- 29, 81-40, 12, 138~18. 20, 21, I. The Literary Form of the Epistle to the Hebrews. — II. Its Authorship and History. — III. The Aim of the Ser mon In Hebrews. — IV. Its Theme and the Development of Its Thought. — V. Its Charm and Power. § CLXVII. The Visions of the Ultimate Victory of Chris tianity in the Book of Revelation 262 ROV. Il"8- I9. H», 21*-8*. 7-13, 18. 18, 26, 31-4, 7, 8, 10, 14-18, 19-22, 41-8, 8b, 5*8», U-14, 79,10, 13, 14-17, 148-13 JQll-lO, 19-21*, 20U-!5, 211-6-' 22-27, 221-s. 10-17. I. The Aim of the Book of Revelation. — II. Its Theme and Literary Character. — III. Its Authorship and Date. — IV. Its Contents and Sources. — V. Its Interpretation. § CLXV 111. The Christian Wisdom of the Epistle of James 277 James 11-2™ S^-i'. 5. I. The Literary Form of the Epistle of James. — II. Its Aim. — III. Its Authorship and Date. — IV. Its Contributions to Developing Christianity. — V. Its Democracy. § CLXIX. The Rule of Love in the Early Christian Church 287 I John 11-2". i8-", 3i->. »-"• »-", 47-si, Apology of Aristides, 15, 16. I. The Aim and Thought of I John. — II. Its Authorship and Date. — III. The Personality Back of the Johannine Writ ings. — IV. The life of the Early Christians. — V. The Es sence of Christianity. APPENDIX I. A Practical Reference Library 301 II. General Questions and Subjects for Special Research 303 MAP AND CHART The Main Highways of the Roman Empire and the Scenes of Paul's Work Frontispiece Chronology of the Apostolic Age To face page 21 xi INTRODUCTION THE RECORDS AND BACKGROUND OF THE APOSTOLIC AGE I THE RECORDS OF THE WORK AND TEACHINGS OF THE APOSTLES I. The Significance of the Apostolic Age. The Apostolic Age began with the death of Jesus in 29 or 30 a.d. and ended about the close of the first Christian century. This brief three-quarters of a century is significant primarily because it represented the practical application, the testing, and the crystallizing of the principles of faith and life which Jesus had set forth. Christianity then came into close contact and competition with many rival religions, such as the Roman emperor- worship, Greek Cynicism, Epicureanism, Stoicism, Judaism, many Egyptian and oriental cults, and, above all, with the popular mystery- religions. In this infinitely complex environment Christianity ceased to be based on certain simple principles proclaimed by Jesus and il lustrated by his life and acts; it gradually developed an elaborate system of doctrines, rules, and institutions. This period marked the beginning of that creed-making era which culminated in 325 a.d. in tlie formulation and acceptance by the Western Church of tiie Nicene Creed. It also witnessed the spread of Christianity from the little community at Jerusalem to Rome and to the widest bounds of the Roman Empire. It saw the growth of a chain of Christian churches reaching from Babylon in the East to Spain in the West and from the Black Sea in the North to the heart of Africa in the South. The vital questions presented by the period are historical and doc trinal. How far was tiie faith of Christianity based on the teachings of Jesus? How far did it come from the active mind cfPaul?, How far wits it a dbinpbsfifc! bf JeVish, Gre^k? anti brMl41 Kfeas? Forta- 1 RECORDS OF THE WORK OF THE APOSTLES nately, in answering these complex yet fundamental questions, we have as a basis of comparison the older records of Jesus' work and teachings. We can focus the search-light of these teachings upon those of Paul and of the other New Testament writers, even as the Great Teacher turned them upon those of the older prophets, priests, and sages. The historical study of the literature of the Apostolic Age gives us also a fresh vision of Jesus. Hitherto the Christian church has seen him largely through the medium of Paul's theology; but now we are be ginning to distinguish in Paul three distinct elements : (1) The Pharisee and devoted student of the Jewish law; (2) The Roman citizen and heir to many of the complex religious ideas current in western Asia during the first Christian century; (3) Paul the mystic and the devoted follower of Jesus who interpreted the teachings of his Master in the light of his own rich personal experience. With a clearer knowledge of the influences which entered into Paul's vision, we are better able to-day to interpret what he actually saw and thus to see Jesus anew through the eyes of the earliest New Testament writer. II. The New Testament Letters and Epistles. Fortunately, we are not dependent upon secondary sources for our knowledge of Paul. The oldest writings in the New Testament come directly from this heroic apostle to the Gentiles and furnish contemporary testimony re garding the most important movements of the first quarter century following the death of Jesus. Paul's letters and epistles were the spontaneous outgrowth of his work. When it was reported to him that false teachers were attempting to undermine his influence with the churches which he had established in Galatia, with hot indignation and earnest zeal he sat down and wrote his impassioned letter to the Galatians. Again, when he was unable to go in person and counsel his disciples in the newly established church at Thessalonica, he put into his letters known as I and II Thessalonians the words which he would doubtless have spoken could he have visited them. Later, in his ab sence from Corinth, he carried on an active correspondence with his fellow Christians there, which is at present incorporated in I and II Corinthians. When he found that he could not go on directly to Rome, as he had hoped, he embodied in a more general epistle the essence of his theological teaching, and added a practical application of the prin ciples of Christianity to the every-day problems of life. Thus arose the New Testament book known as the Epistle to the Romans. Through these letters and episties of Paul it is possible to know him almost as intimately as did those who sat under his direct teaching. NEW TESTAMENT LETTERS AND EPISTLES They introduce us to Paul as he pleads with the disciples to choose the right, or as he pours out his passionate protestations of affection and appreciation, or as he declares his faith in God and in his son, Jesus Christ, or at the high moments of his thought and experience, as when, for example, he sings his immortal hymn of love. Few characters of antiquity are revealed more clearly than is that of Paul in his ten or twelve original episties. Even in pastoral episties like Titus and I and II Timothy the nucleus is undoubtedly Pauline and the spirit of the great apostle transfuses them, though in their final form they probably came from the pens of later disciples. These epis tles also give valuable incidental information regarding the details of Paul's work and of conditions in the Roman world, thus richly supple menting and at several points correcting the more systematic record of Acts. In these episties, as well as in the later writings associated with the names of Peter, and James, and John, it is possible to trace clearly the growth of Christian institutions and doctrines. Epistles like II and III John and Philemon contain many personal touches which reveal the spirit and life of the early Christians. In Hebrews we listen to a great Christian preacher, setting forth the doctrines of the church as they were taught near the close of the first century. Thus through the epistles it is possible to view from many different angles the early growth and expansion of Christianity. III. The Aim of the Book of Acts. The reference in the preface of the book of Acts to "my former volume" and to "Theophilus" im phes that the purpose of its author was to continue the narrative of the Third Gospel and to trace the triumphs and progress of the Chris tian church from Jerusalem to Rome. A closer examination of Acts reveals the fact that its aim was not merely historical but irenical, practical, and to a certain extent apologetic. Its author evidently had three classes of readers in mind: (1) the Jewish and Gentile fol lowers of Jesus; (2) the Jews who refused to accept Jesus as the Mes siah; and (3) the Graeco-Roman world. His practical aim therefore is threefold: First, to reconcile the differences in the early church re garding its duty to Gentiles and to show how, notwithstanding the op position of certain narrow Judaizers in its ranks, under the guidance of the Spirit of God and through the heroism and persistency of the early apostles, and especially of Paul, it had swept over the barriers of Jewish and heathen opposition, and finally gained a firm foothold in the capital city of the empire. These facts are presented as the final, pragmatic answer to the objections of the narrow Judaistic Christians. 3 RECORDS OF THE WORK OF THE APOSTLES The second aim is to demonstrate that Christianity was born under the shadow of the temple or in the Jewish synagogues, and that not Christianity but Judaism precipitated the bitter hostility between the two kindred faiths. The third aim is to win a favorable reception for Christianity at Rome and from the Roman officials throughout the empire. To that end especial emphasis is placed upon Paul's Roman citizenship and on the endeavor to show that his persecutions and im prisonments came simply as the result of malignant Jewish or heathen attacks, and that the Roman officials with practical uniformity defended rather than assailed him. This aim doubtless explains why there is no mention of Paul's flogging by the Roman lictors, as recorded in II Corinthians ll26, and why the narrative of Acts ends abruptly, saying nothing about Paul's final trial and execution. The all-embracing aim was to show how the spirit and presence of Jesus continued to inspire and direct his followers, so that all that they taught and accomplished was inspired by their living Lord and Master. IV. Authorship and Date of Acts. The critical scholarship of the last century has tended to confirm the testimony of early-church tradition that Luke, the companion of Paul, was the writer of both the Third Gospel and the present book of Acts. Detailed studies of each word and phrase have demonstrated that tiie same literary character istics recur throughout these books. The preponderance of medical terms, the marked interest in miracles of healing, and the evidence at every turn of the exact knowledge which only a physician could pos sess (cf. Hobart, Medical Language of St. Luke) distinguish Acts and the Third Gospel from all other New Testament writings. This re markable unity of literary style and medical interest points clearly to Luke, the physician, as their common author. The direct statements in Acts strongly confirm this conclusion. In the accounts of Paul's journey from Troas to Philippi (1610"17), later from Philippi to Jerusalem (205-2118), and from Csesarea to Rome (27-28), the author writes in the first person, indicating that he accompanied Paul. The detailed ac count of their last journey to Rome implies that only two friends, Aristarchus and the author of the so-called "we" sections, were with Paul. Of the six friends whom Paul states were with him at Rome during his imprisonment (Col. 410"14, Philemon 23_24) practically none except Luke the "beloved physician" (in the light of Acts 1539, 272, and II Tim. 410) could have been the author of this journal of travel. Little is known regarding Luke, but that little is significant. It is clear that he was a Greek Christian. He was certainly for a time a 4 AUTHORSHIP AND DATE OF ACTS resident and possibly a native of Philippi, although tradition makes him a native of Syrian Antioch. He accompanied Paul in his longer and more important journeys, probably in the capacity of medical at tendant; but he is also mentioned by tiie great apostle as a "co worker." His keen interest in all questions which concerned the life and work of Jesus and the extension of Christianity throughout the Roman world is clearly demonstrated in the writings which have come from his pen. Acts 218-10 indicates that he remained for a time in the house of Philip the Evangehst and that at Jerusalem he had ample opportunity to converse with James, the brother of Jesus, as well as with many others of the early Christian disciples. At other times he was associated with John Mark, Barnabas, and Silas, and in fact was personally acquainted with practically all of the great Christian leaders of the ApostoUc Age. His opportunities, therefore, for gather ing information and written records regarding the facts of which he writes were unusual. The culture, the historical method, and the broad interest revealed throughout his writings give to them a unique value. The date of the book of Acts is still an open question. Its preface indicates that it was written after the Third Gospel, and its general point of view is that of the last quarter of the first Christian century, when the spirited conflicts between the Jewish and Gentile sections of the church had lost much of their bitterness. Its obvious endeavor to commend Christianity to the Roman world and to demonstrate that the early apostles were never hindered nor attacked by Roman officials suggests strongly that the book of Acts was written late in the century, when Roman opposition was beginning to develop but before the violent persecutions under Domitian about 96 a.d. The book in its final form may therefore be dated with considerable assurance between 80 and 95 a.d. V. The Early Sources Quoted in Acts I1— IS35. If we did not have the original Gospel of Mark, we would not have known that Luke in his gospel was quoting extensively from this older written source, for his method was to reproduce the ideas and facts of the original in his own language. This literary habit makes the discovery of the early sources which he quoted exceedingly difficult. The evidence, however, is convincing that in Acts, as well as in his gospel, he utilized earher records. Here the linguistic evidence is especially strong, for, as Professor Torrey has shown (The Aramaic Source in Acts), practically all of Acts lMo35 is Luke's translation of an older Aramaic source or 5 RECORDS OF THE WORK OF THE APOSTLES sources. This fact is vitally important, for it strongly supports the historical value of this part of Acts. Luke's sources were not floating, popular traditions but definite, written records evidently committed to writing long before Luke completed our present book of Acts. The linguistic evidence suggests that Luke found the Aramaic original of the first part of his history of early Christianity in practically the same form as he has given it to us in his Greek translation. The internal proof, however, is cumulative that originally independent documents or traditions have been combined in this old Aramaic source. In one or two cases duplicate traditions of the same event are discernible. Thus the analogies are so many and so close between the simple, straightforward account of the imprisonment and liberation of Peter and John in Acts 41"31 and the more miraculous and elaborate version in 517"42, that there is Uttle doubt that they are older and later versions of the same incident. In Acts 9, 22, and 26 Luke also gives three distinct accounts of Paul's conversion, each of which differs in details from the others. The incompleteness of certain of the narratives also points to originally independent sources. Thus, for example, in ll30 and 152 the elders at Jerusalem are introduced without any explanation of their origin. In 1217 James, the brother of Jesus, suddenly appears with out any account of his conversion or explanation of how he became the leader of the Jerusalem Christian community. In different parts of the book diverse points of view are also apparent. Thus in chapters 3-5, 8, and 9^-1 118, the interest centres in Peter and to him is attributed the pioneer work in reconciling the variant views of the Jewish and Gentile Christians regarding their obUgations to the Jewish ceremonial law. But in the section which begins with chapter 13 it is Paul's persistency and initiative, even in the face of strong opposition, that finaUy leads to the breaking of Jewish bonds. The only satisfactory explanation of these minor, yet significant variations, is that originaUy distinct tradi tions have here been combined. At least two important groups of early Christian traditions may be distinguished in chapters 3-15. The first is found in 3«-5>6, 8"°, 931-!!18, and 121-". The geographical back ground is Palestine and the events gather about Jerusalem, Csesarea, and Samaria. Peter and PhiUp are the chief actors. It is possible that the facts which these stories record were gathered and written down by Philip or his daughters. The narratives found in eMJ4, nu-so centre about Jerusalem and Antioch and form the natural introduction to the account of the first missionary campaign of Paul and Barnabas, found in Acts 12M-1536. It has been suggested that SUas, who, accord- 6 THE EARLY SOURCES QUOTED IN ACTS ing to 1527, was sent as a messenger by the Jerusalem church to the Christians at Antioch, was perhaps the one who wrote this group of narratives. Whatever be their exact history, it is clear that these nar ratives must be regarded as the primary sources in the book of Acts. The complete absence of any reference to the destruction of Jerusalem or to the bitter persecutions which the Christians experienced under Nero favor the conclusion that the majority of them at least were written early in the second half of the first century. VI. Later Traditions in l1-^85. In addition to the material drawn from the earher written sources certam narratives are found in the first part of Acts which bear aU the marks of being secondary. The first is the account of the ascension in l1"12. In the Gospel of Luke Jesus' ascension takes place at the close of the day on which he arose from the grave (cf. V, 304, 305) ; but in the account in Acts it is at the end of forty days. Why Luke preferred to incorporate this in his later work is not entirely clear. Its presence has been one of the chief stumbling-blocks in accepting the Lucan authorship of Acts. The reason is probably because he found it already in the Aramaic source, which he quoted as a whole. As has been truly said: "Whatever in volved a miracle attracted rather than repeUed Luke." The account of the choice of a successor to Judas, in l13"25, evidently contains an important historical kernel. At least this narrative gives us the first glimpse into the life of the Christian community at Jerusalem. The story of the day of Pentecost resembles in literary character the na tivity stories, which stand at the beginnings of the First and Third Gospels, but it clearly preserves the memory of a transcendently im portant event in the early history of Christianity. The later dupUcate account of the imprisonment and Uberation of Peter and John, con tained in 517"42, bears the marks of later growth. The account of Paul's conversion in 91"18 is probably based on what appear to be older ac counts in 22 and 26. Occasional editorial additions, as for example, 243-47) 1122, 23. so) 1225, may be detected, but the presence of these later traditions and editorial additions only tends to confirm the conviction that the web and woof of the narratives in Acts 1-15 is very early and reliable Christian tradition. VII. The Journal of Travel. The excellent historical character of the second half of the book of Acts has long been recognized. Here at every point a familiarity with detaUs and a certainty of touch are apparent which are possible only when the author is intimately familiar with the events which he is recording, as weU as with their geographical 7 RECORDS OF THE WORK OF THE APOSTLES and historical setting. Recent excavations and research have signaUy confirmed the accuracy of the minute political, social, and reUgious al lusions to the pecuUar and rapidly changing conditions in Asia Minor and southern Europe. The explanation of these significant facts is furnished by the book of Acts itself. As has already been noted, in 16io-is) 206-15, 211"18, 27L-2816, the author speaks not in the third but in the first person, thereby quietly setting forth the fact that he himself was a witness of the events which he records. The exactness and minuteness of detail which characterize these passages also suggest strongly that Luke is not dependent upon verbal memory but upon a journal of travel, such as it was customary for companions of important travellers to keep in order to recall their experiences. It is also probable that in the passages where the third person is used Luke was also able to draw from his own notes or from those of others who accompanied Paul, for they reveal much the same minuteness and exactness of detail as do the so-caUed "we" passages. This conviction is confirmed by the fact that from 1536 to the end of the book there is not the sUghtest evidence that Luke was translating from earUer Aramaic sources. The style is homogeneous throughout. In contrast to the first part of the book, where Luke is quoting from older Aramaic sources and where there are nearly a hundred quotations from the Old Testament, the second part of Acts contains only one or two quotations. The whole is written not only in a finished Uterary style but also from the point of view of Luke, who beyond reasonable doubt was himself the author of the journal of travel. Thus out of a half century of radical criticism, which has been in clined at times to seriously discredit the historicity of the book of Acts, it has emerged and stands as one of the best historical documents that have come down to us from antiquity. Its faults are shared in common with the best historical writings of the period as, for example, the Annals of Tacitus, in which miracle stories are recounted with the greatest as surance. In using the book of Acts it is important to follow the pri mary sources. There is every reason to beUeve that these give us a re markably faithful picture of the chief characters and events in the early history of the Christian church. WhUe the book of Acts is ex ceUent history, it is more than a history, it is the epic of conquering Christianity; it is the pragmatic proof of the bvincible power of the spirit and teachings of Jesus. n THE HISTORICAL AND RELIGIOUS BACKGROUND OF THE APOSTOLIC AGE I. The Rulers of Rome. Augustus realized his lofty ambition and brought practicaUy aU the civilized nations of the earth under one common rule. Rome in the first Christian century represented the world, and the emperor was not merely the symbol but the embodi ment of all authority and government. The welfare of the world, therefore, depended as never before upon his character and pohcy. As a result, the citizens of the empire experienced the most varied vicis situdes of fortune during the seventy years (between 30 and 100 a.d.) which constituted the background of the Apostolic Age. Tiberius, who reigned until 37, was a stern moralist, so severe that he was regarded as a despot by the Roman nobiUty, whose vices he vainly endeavored to check. Caligula, who reigned from 37 to 41, was thoroughly un sound both morally and mentaUy. The brevity of his reign alone saved the empire from shipwreck and his Jewish and Christian subjects from terrible persecution, for in his insanity he imperatively demanded that he be worshipped as a deity by every citizen of the empire. Clau dius, born in southern Gaul, proved, Uke Tiberius, a champion of the provinces and endeavored by a generous policy to unite in loyal citi zenship aU parts of the empire. He laid down the significant principle: "It is right that men should Uve in the religion of their country." He also instituted humane laws in behalf of slaves. For the first time in the history of Rome the killing of a slave by his master was branded as a capital offense. After a reign of thirteen years Claudius was suc ceeded in 54 by Nero, who came to the throne at the age of seventeen as a result of the intrigues of his mother, Agrippina. For the first eight years of his reign the direction of the government was left almost entirely to Burrus, the Pretorian prefect, and Seneca, the Stoic philos opher. Seneca favored the provinces, although he himself amassed a great fortune through the misuse of his official position. At the death of Burrus in 62 Seneca kiUed himself at the emperor's command, and 9 THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE AGE Nero assumed active control of the government. In contrast to his profligate nobles, Nero was not altogether bad but capricious. His persecution of the Christians in 64 was only one of the many mad acts of tyranny that in 68 led to a revolt of the provinces which drove Nero to suicide. In the anarchy which ensued four Roman emperors were crowned within a year, three of whom were military leaders. The last, Vespasian, the commander of the Roman army in Syria, a plebeian, succeeded in restoring peace to the empire. Setting aside the old Roman nobility, he recruited its ranks from the provinces and the cities of Italy. Thereby he gave new Ufe to the Senate which, nominaUy at least, represented the people. Henceforth it supported the emperor and assisted him in the reorganization of the empire. Titus, the con queror of Jerusalem, who in 79 succeeded his father, was kind and benev olent, intent only on promoting the welfare of his subjects. After a short reign of two years he was succeeded in 81 by his younger brother, Domitian, a scholar with high moral standards but ambitious of power and suspicious of the Senate. During his reign of fifteen years the empire prospered, but many of his subjects and especiaUy the Chris tians were the victims of his tyranny and suspicions. Nerva, who in 96 was chosen as Domitian's successor by the Senate, shared his author ity with his coUeagues and inaugurated an era of Uberty and good-will which was perpetuated by his successor, Trajan (98-117). The rulers of this period present the most striking contrasts. Claudius and Ves pasian heroically endeavored to conserve the interests of aU their subjects. Caligula and Nero, on the other hand, were absolutely irre sponsible and vicious. Titus and Nerva were too lenient toward of fenders and too lax in their rule to control the diverse elements in the empire. Tiberius and Domitian were conscientious tyrants who won the UI wiU of the majority of their subjects. Under these very differ ent types of rulers Christianity in turn prospered and was persecuted. II. What Rome Did for Christianity. It is an unquestioned fact that Rome alone made possible Christianity's marveUous progress during the first Christian century. The rapid spread of that local cult, an offspring of hated Judaism, until it reached the farthest bounds of the Roman Empire is unquestionably the greatest marvel in human history. The primary explanation is the personality of the Founder of Christianity and the potency of the principles which he proclaimed, but the miracle was possible because its environment was uniquely favorable. The strong hand of Augustus and of the emperors who succeeded him put an end to the destructive wars which had disrupted 10 WHAT ROME DID FOR CHRISTIANITY and devastated the states encircling the Mediterranean and for a cen tury established practically unbroken peace. Moreover, Rome unified these diverse nations, broke down all political and racial barriers, and substituted for petty patriotism an enlarged consciousness of world citizenship. Throughout its vast domains Rome established police protection; the pirates were hunted from the sea and robbers even from the remote mountain passes. Over vaUeys and rivers and mountains broad highways were bunt which made travel in all parts of the empire relatively easy and rapid. Accommodations for traveUers and traders were established in aU the important cities along these highways, and imperial postal service made communication easy. Under the fostering protection of Rome, Greek traders, artists, and travelling philosophers carried the culture and language of ancient Hellas from the vaUeys of the Tigris and Euphrates to the PUlars of Hercules, so that Greek be came the common language of communication between aU the different citizens of the empire, and even in the imperial city. The great pub- Ushing houses, through the services of hundreds of slaves, were able to issue books almost as cheaply as to-day. Literature and the easy means of communication made it possible for ideas to travel with marveUous rapidity throughout the civilized world. Above aU, Rome until the very close of the first century was tolerant toward all types of reUgion. Even in the imperial city itself scores of provincial cults had their devotees, their interpreters, and in many cases their priests and temples. III. Contemporary Palestinian Judaism. The Apostolic Age was a supremely critical period in the history of Judaism. Under the rule of the Roman procurators, who in turn were under the immediate direction of the emperor, Judea felt most acutely every change in the policy of succeeding rulers. Tiberius's zeal to protect the interest of the provinces led him in 36 to banish Pontius Pilate on a charge of mis- government. The mad Caligula figures both as a friend and a foe of the Jews. In 37 he appointed Herod Agrippa, the grandson of Herod the Great, king over the east-Jordan tetrarchy of PhUip and in 39 added GaUlee and Perea to his dominion. It was at this period that the per sonal intercession of Herod Agrippa, who had been a boon companion of Caligula, alone saved the Jews from wholesale slaughter because they refused to worship the emperor. The reign of Claudius was a golden era for his Jewish subjects. In payment of certain personal obUgations to Herod Agrippa the emperor made him king over all the territory that had belonged to his grandfather, Herod the Great. For three 11 THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE AGE years, 41-44, the Jews enjoyed great prosperity and privileges under his rule. Like most of the Herodian famuy he was a pagan at heart, but he posed as the guardian of Jewish traditions and rights not only in Palestine but throughout the Roman world. His sudden death in 44 a.d. marked the beginning of a disastrous chapter in Jewish his tory. His son, Agrippa II, was later made king of the kingdom of Chalcis and given charge of the Jerusalem temple and the right of ap pointing the high priest, but in 44 a.d. Judah was again placed under the rule of the procurators. Each succeeding ruler proved worse than his predecessor. The history of Judah from 44 to 66 is a sickening record of cruelty and rapacity on the part of the procurators and of insurrections, futile messianic uprisings, and growing hatred on the part of the Jews. After the death of Nero, and while rival emperors were struggling for the imperial throne, the Zealots precipitated the final rebellion against Rome which resulted in the complete destruc tion of Jerusalem and the temple. Fanaticism and civil war between the different Jewish factions made this one of the bloodiest struggles in human history. Finally, after Vespasian had been made emperor, Titus, his son, was left victor over a smouldering ruin and a devastated land. From 70 to -the end of the century the intellectual capital of Judaism was transferred to Jamnia. Here its learned rabbis continued to study the law. Here also the canon of the Old Testament was com pleted about 90 a.d. Though mortally smitten by Rome, the Jews con tinued to dream their dreams of the Messiah who would yet descend from heaven, judge the heathen nations, and set up his supernatural kingdom in which the faithful would be raised from the dead to share with those who were living the glories of the messianic reign. IV. The Judaism of the Dispersion. In the apostolic history the Jews of the dispersion figured more prominently than those of Palestine. Continued residence in Greek-speaking lands had produced in many ways a different type of Jew from that found under the shadow of the temple. He was equaUy loyal to the traditions and institutions of his race and made frequent pilgrimages to the sacred city, but his outlook was broader and his mind more open to new truth. Many of them, like Philo of Alexandria and the author of IV Maccabees, had accepted many of the principles of the Greek philosophers and were endeavoring both in theory and practice to reconcUe Judaism and Hellenism. In their contemporary writings one wUl find many ideas that are familiar to the readers of Paul's epistles. Thus, for example, the author of IV Ezra (321) declares: "The first Adam, clothing him- 12 THE JUDAISM OF THE DISPERSION self with the evil heart, transgressed and was overcome; and likewise also aU who were born of him." Like their Palestinian brothers, they were expecting the speedy advent of a divine messianic king to inaugu rate a new era in human history. Beginning as early as the second cen tury B.C. an earnest missionary spirit had developed among these Jews of the dispersion. The Greek translation of the scriptures had been made not only for their use but to commend the truths which these contained to the Gentile world. In such centres as Alexandria, the Greek allegorizing and spirituahzing methods of interpretation, had been applied by many Jewish scholars to these older scriptures. Israel's cere monial institutions and even the chief events of its history were inter preted simply as symbols of spiritual reahties or of future events. Under this aUegorizing process the strict insistence upon obedience to the ceremonial law was gradually given up and thus the door to Judaism was opened wide to the GentUe world. The intense zeal of these later Jewish missionaries is revealed by the volume and variety of the literature which they put forth. By means of an elastic, aUegorizing method of interpretation all that was finest in Greek phUosophy was read back into the Old Testament. Moses and the later prophets were proclaimed the forerunners of Plato and Aristotle. Greek phUosophy was thus made the servant of the Jewish reUgion, for whatever the Jews of the dispersion wrote had the prac tical aim of winning converts and of influencing men to Uve a higher moral Ufe. Imitating Homer, PhUo of Alexandria wrote an epic de scribing in heroic terms the great events and personalities of Israel's history. These earnest missionaries even dramatized that stirring his tory. Fragments of the great reUgious epic caUed The Exodus sur vive as an iUustration of the way in which they used the methods of the Greek drama to commend the religion of Jehovah to the Hellenic world. Their earnest efforts were rewarded. Many Greeks and Romans shared Israel's faith. A few became what were called "proselytes of righteousness," submitting to circumcision and faithfully keeping aU the commands of the Jewish ceremonial law. These were freely ad mitted to aU the services of the temple and enjoyed in full the re Ugious privileges of native-born Jews. The majority, however, took only a partial step toward Judaism. They accepted its monotheism and its moral and social teachings but did not attempt to meet all its ceremonial requirements. Apparently these converts were welcomed by the Jews of the dispersion and were admitted freely to the services of the synagogue. These were included in the class designated in the 13 THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE AGE book of Acts as the "God-fearing Greeks." They were found in al most every synagogue which Paul visited in the larger cities outside Palestine. It is probable that this class also included the open-minded students of religion, of whom there were many, who were seeking re ligious and ethical truth and inspiration wherever they could find them. They reveal clearly the religious conditions and spiritual needs of the world to which Christianity appealed. From their ranks came most of the early Gentile converts. Their presence in the synagogues also exerted a powerful broadening influence upon the Jews of the disper sion, preparing them for the reception of the nobler message which Christianity brought. Thus this wide-spread Jewish missionary move ment must be reckoned as one of the most important forces in preparing the world for Christianity. V. The Greek Philosophies. The Jewish scholars of the dis persion, in seeking to reconcUe Moses and Plato, paid the highest tribute they possibly could to the Greek phUosophers. Israel's prac tical religious teachers recognized that there was much in the intel lectual life of Greece that possessed a permanent value for aU man kind. They realized that the phUosophers, like the Hebrew sages, approached life from the point of view of the individual. When the gods of the old Greek mythology were beginning to topple into the dust, these lovers of men strove to give their feUows certam working principles by which to live. Plato's great permanent contribution to Hellenic thought was the belief in individual immortality. In the first Christian century he was better represented by PhUo, the fan tastic but earnest Jew of Alexandria, than by the dUettante acade micians at Rome, whose attitude on most vital questions was either negative or skeptical. Epicureanism was still an active force in the empire. These sturdy scientists of that early age held that matter was the only ultimate reality and that their senses were the only guides to be trusted in the quest for truth. All the current superstitions they unhesitatingly threw overboard. They were ready to grant that the gods existed, but not that they exerted any influence in the earth or on the Ufe of man. In this respect they stood directly opposed to the Stoics. The crowning virtue of the Epicureans was their sturdy loyalty to facts as they saw them. It was, however, a cold phUosophy entirely devoid of spiritual inspiration. Out of the noble teaching and example of Socrates grew the two phUosophies which were potent moral and religious forces in the life 14 THE GREEK PHILOSOPHIES of the age. Both were inspired by the same missionary zeal and the same interest in the moral welfare of the individual that had actuated the great Athenian teacher. Cynicism, whose founder was a pupU of Socrates, aimed to teach men how to live true to nature. This ideal was often carried to crude extremes. The Cynic philosophers were the early prototypes of the Franciscan friars, and they were sin cerely devoted to the interests of the masses. Most of them hved lives of noble self-sacrifice and undoubtedly exerted a great influence on the people. Their basic creed was closely akin to that of the Stoics. This popular phUosophy bore the stamp of its eastern origin. It taught that the ultimate reaUty in the universe was not matter but reason, and that the final source of reason was God. The Logos, or divine Reason, is what binds men to God. All men, therefore, are divine in so far as that divine Reason enters into them and they foUow its guidance. Here the author of the first chapter of Genesis and the Stoic phUosophers join hands. Like the Founder of Christianity, they taught that the supreme task in Ufe was to do the divine will, and that the wiU of God is done by Uving a virtuous life in the service of man. In theory at least Stoicism was also democratic, for it taught that all men possess this divine Reason and that only those who refuse to foUow its dictates and commit crimes not in harmony with the divine plan are slaves. The Stoics also beUeved that pain and suffering possess a positive value in developing the individual and that therefore they should be patiently and even joyously borne. In dealing with the old mythologies they, like the Jews of the dispersion, employed the aUegorical method of interpretation. They also sought to retain the older forms of their reUgion, as long as they were helpful in develop ing the individual. Regarding his future immortaUty their teachings, especiaUy in the first Christian century, were vague and uncertain. To the prosperous, educated man Cynicism and Stoicism had much to offer. They seemed to satisfy the facts of experience and furnished a practical basis for Uving. But for the outcast or the man who faced death the reUgion of Reason gave but cold comfort. At the same time these two philosophies were in a very real sense pioneers of Christian ity. The beUef that men were the children of God, that communica tion between him and them was possible, and that the end of existence was to do his wUl by Uving a virtuous and self-sacrificing life had been held and taught as strongly by Israel's prophets and sages as by the founders of these two phUosophies. The doctrine of the Logos, or divine Reason, as the bond between God and men was also destined to 15 THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE AGE exert a powerful influence upon certain phases of Christian thinking, and to find acceptance, as it does in the opening verses of the Fourth Gospel. VI. The Emperor-Worship. Rome did not inherit from its past a native religion virile and broad enough to become the religion of the empire. Yet the need was keenly felt for a co-ordinating religious influence which would reinforce the growing consciousness of poUtical unity. Emperor-worship attempted to meet this need. HistoricaUy it was the product of a long evolutionary process. In its origin the idea was Oriental rather than Occidental. In ancient Egypt and Baby lonia the kings were believed to be incarnations of the deity. Thus the old Babylonian kings Sargon I and Naram Sin in the fourth mU- lennium B.C. placed the sign for god before their names. Gudea, the Sumerian king of ancient Lagash, prayed to a goddess: "I have no mother, thou art my mother. I have no father, thou art my father. ... In the sanctuary thou didst bear me." When Alexander the Great conquered the East he was soon deified and was worshipped long after his death. His successors, the kings of Syria and Egypt, were practically without exception thus worshipped. From the Orient this tendency to deify successful rulers spread to the Western world. The Greeks themselves early show an inclination to worship genius. Thus Aristotle reared an altar in Athens to Plato soon after his death. As has been well said: "The Greek theory of monarchy started with man and made of him its god; the Oriental notion started with God and made the monarch in his image" (Case, Evolution of Early Christian ity, p. 205). Pompey was publicly proclaimed a god in Athens. Dio Cassius (XLIII, 146) and Suetonius (Julius Casar, 76) both state that Julius Csesar was styled during his lifetime "The God and Dictator and Saviour of All the World." In 42 B.C. the Roman Senate enacted that his title should be, "Divus Julius." Augustus's disapproval of this strong popular tendency repressed its public expression during his lifetime, but it did not prevent the masses from worshipping him long after his death. Henceforth it became a fixed institution in the Roman Empire. Inasmuch as it was a valuable uniting force, it was en couraged even by the better emperors. Moreover, there soon gathered about it certain national hopes that were akin to the Jewish messianic expectations. Gentiles as well as Jews were longing for a divine de liverer who would put down evil, establish justice, and inaugurate an era of prosperity. VergU's famous prediction, found in his fourth 16 THE EMPEROR-WORSHIP Eclogue, clearly voices this hope: "The last age prophesied by the sibyl has come and the great series of ages begins anew. Justice now returns, Saturn reigns once more, and a new progeny is sent down from high heaven. O chaste Lucina, be thou propitious to the infant boy under whom first the iron age shall cease and the golden age over all the world arise. . . . O chUd, as soon as thou shalt be able to read the praises of heroes and the achievements of thy sire and to know what virtue is, the fields shaU by degrees grow yellow with ripening corn, blushing grapes shaU hang on a rude bramble, and hard oaks shaU drip with dewy honey. . . . Dear offspring of the gods, mighty seed of Jove, enter thy great heritage, for the time is now at hand. See how the world's massive dome bows before thee — earth and oceans and the vault of heaven!" Roman and Jew be lieved that the coming deUverer, whom they, Uke Vergil, thought would speedUy appear, was to be divinely gffted and that his advent was to be attended by marveUous portents. These miracles meant more to the Orientals than to the Greeks or Romans. The latter preferred to worship a man who manifested heroic qualities rather than a God merely let down from heaven. Both Greek and Oriental believed, however, that the uniqueness of those whom they deified came through birth. "Son of God" was a common term among the Greeks and Romans and was interpreted by them in a very literal sense. Augustus bore the title Divi filius, and many were the traditions current regard ing his divine parentage and miraculous birth (e. g., Suetonius, Aug., 94). Therefore the early Christian missionaries found the Grseco- Roman world in an expectant attitude. Their claim seemed as natural as that of the scientists do to the men of the twentieth century. Their only task was to prove their facts. It was also inevitable that mission aries Uke Paul, who were Roman citizens, speaking to their Gentile audi ences, should interpret Jesus in the terms not only of the Jewish mes sianic hope but of the larger Roman world to which they appealed. Thus it was that the emperor- worship proved an active force in opening their eyes to the fact that Jesus was not a mere Jewish Messiah but the universal Saviour of mankind. This potent influence also carried many of the early Christian theologians still further and led them to proclaim him the Creator and Ruler of the universe, as weU as the Friend and Saviour of sinful men. VII. The Mystery-Religions. The emperor-cult, which was sim ply the worship of power and success, and the Greek phUosophies, 17 THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE AGE with their cold appeal to reason, never fuUy met the deeper spiritual needs of the people. What they desired was something that would satisfy their emotions as well as their reason and would give them the consciousness of fellowship with the Deity and the assurance of per sonal salvation. This craving for individual protection and salvation is as old as the race. As soon as man recognized the presence of hos tile forces in the world, he sought means whereby he might aUy him self with some higher power or powers that would dehver him. First he felt the need of deliverance from natural forces, from wUd beasts and human foes. Larger experience opened his eyes to the mahgnant effects of sin. Therefore he went in quest of a saviour or of a way that would deliver him from this insidious evU. Many were the ways that were devised. Scientific knowledge in time provided a partial way of deliverance from his old foes — hostile man and beast and the forces of nature. Moral laws also pointed out ways in which he might in part anticipate the malign effects of sin; but he never ceased to feel the need of the help of some power outside himseff. Judaism and Stoicism put the greater emphasis on man's activity as the way of deliverance. The so-caUed mystery-reUgions put the chief stress on the help from without. They greatly attracted the masses because they claimed to make clear the way in which man might put himself into touch with this power from without and be assured of salvation. There were many types of mystery-religions in the Roman Empire, each with its exponents and its devotees. From Egypt came the mysteries of Isis; from Persia and India the Mithra cults. From Asia Minor came the Cybele-Attis mysteries. In Greece the Eleu- sinian mysteries, which were associated with the worship of Demeter, and the more riotous Orphic cults had long flourished. Each of these had its representatives in Rome and in many of the larger cities in the empire. Each had attracted to its shrine Romans, Greeks, and Orientals, for each had ceased to be merely a national religion or local cult. The rites differed widely. As a rule, the Oriental types were more frenzied and appealed largely to the emotions and some times to the passions, but they all had certain characteristics in com mon. They all claimed to bring their initiates into personal communion with the Deity by means of their mystic rites. They demanded of their followers, as a preliminary, ceremonial and, to a certain degree, moral purity. Thus the requirement of the candidate in the Eleusinian mysteries was that he should be able to speak the Greek language in- 18 THE MYSTERY-RELIGIONS telligently and "be pure of hand." To this was later added the re quirement that he should "be pure of soul." Most of the mystery- religions also promised to give to their initiates the consciousness of deliverance from sin and of reconcUiation with the Deity. To this they added the assurance of personal immortality and of dwelling happUy with the gods. As a result of their primitive origin, the popular mys tery-religions were a strange, almost incomprehensible combination of sensuaUty and idealism, often passing over into asceticism, of sur vivals of pagan sorcery and rituaUsm, combined with the loftiest con ceptions of Greek phUosophy, of crude beUefs, coming from barbarous ages, and divine ideals of feUowship with God and man. Notwith standing their traditional limitations, they were not only tolerated by the emperors but received the indorsement of prominent Romans. Cicero declares (in De Leg., 314) : "In the mysteries we perceive the prin ciples of real Ufe and learn not only to Uve happUy but we die with a fairer hope." By virtue of their democracy and their appeal to uni versal human needs the mystery-religions proved Christianity's strong est competitor in the first century. At the same time, like Judaism and the Greek phUosophies and even the emperor-worship, they did much to prepare the minds of men for the reception of Christianity. As was inevitable, when competition was so close and constant and when there was so much in them that was essentially good, they exerted a powerful influence upon Christianity, as is shown, for example, not only in the language but also in the thought of Paul and in the rites which were ultimately adopted by the Christian church. VIII. The Religious and Social Needs of the Masses in the Roman Empire. Christianity in the first century spoke to a needy world. Rome had done much to promote the welfare of the masses, but it could not satisfy the deeper cravings of the individual. Men crave companionship. The many guUds and fraternities which flour ished throughout the empire revealed this need. They also longed for a way of personal as weU as social salvation. Amidst the wreck age of the old mythologies they longed for a worthy object of personal beUef and devotion. The crimes and their consequences, which del uged and blackened society and the life of the individual, had made vividly clear the need of a faith that would unite religion and morals. The disastrous distinctions between slave and freedmen and irre sponsible noble had sent the thinkers of the world in quest of a unifying faith that would bind aU men and classes together. Even in imperial 19 THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE AGE Rome the great crying need was for democracy and fellowship in re Ugion, for a faith that would make all men brothers and happy and hopeful in the common service of a common Lord and Master. In that ancient world, with its hundreds of rival cults, Christianity emerged triumphant because it met these universal needs. 20 CHRONOLOGY OF THE APOSTOLIC AGE JLD. 30 40 50 80 100 ROME JEWISH HISTORY AND LITERATURE CHRISTIAN HISTORY AND LITERATURE Tiber! Cal Lull is 18-36 Caiaphas high priest 26-36 Pontius Pilate procurator 20-42 Literary activity of Philo 137 Banishment of Herod Antipas 37 Herod Agrippa succeeds Philip 38 Persecution of Jews at Alexandria 29 or 30 Jesus' death. Day of Pentecost 31 Appointment of the Seven 32 Martyrdom of Stephen 32-33 Philip's preaching. Christianity at Antioch 33 Paul's conversion. 33-35 Paul in Arabia 35-47 Paul in Syria and Cilicia 41 L Ciau lius 40 Philo's Contra Flaccum and Legatio ad Caium 41-44 Retgn of Herod Agrippa 1 44 Rebellion led by Theudas 46-47 Famine in Palatine 44 Martyrdom of James the son of Zebedee 46 Paul at Antioch 47 Paul's conference with the "pillar" apostles 47-49 Paul's first missionary campaign 49 Council at Jerusalem. Peter at Antioch 49-50 Paul's work in Macedonia 54 50 Jews banished from Rome 50-100 Reign of Herod Agrippa II 52-55 Procuratorship of Feint 52-66 Rebellions in Palestine 56-58 Procuratorship of Festus 50 Paul's arrival at Athens and Corinth 50-51 Letters to Thessalonians and Galatians 52-54 Paul at Ephesus. Letters to Corinthians 54-56 Paul's arrest at Jerusalem. Imprisonment 57-58 Prisoner at Rome. Philemon, Col., Eph., Phil. 58 Parts of // Timothy. Paul's martyrdom Ne 68 69 ro 66 Jews declare war against Rome 69 False Nero in East 61 or 62 Martyrdom of James the brother of Jesus 64 Persecution of the Christians by Nero 64 Martyrdom of Peter at Rome 66 Right of the Christians to Pella Va79 Titin pasian I 70 Jerusalem and Temple destroyed 75-79 Josephus's Jewish Wat 70-75 Gospel of Mark 75-80 Gospel of Matthew 81 Dom IT" itian 80 Founding Rabbinic School at Jamnia 80-90 W Ezra 85-96 Domitian's oppression of the Jews 80-85 Gospel of Luke 80-90 Acts 85-90 Hebrew 85-96 Domitian's persecutions of Christians 96 Nerva 98 Tr. |an 90 Synod at Jamnia 90 Canon of 0. T. fixed 93 Josephus's Antiquities 90-95 / Peter 95 Revelation 96-110 Jama. I Clement 96-110 /, //. Ill John. Gospel of John 96-115 Pastoral Epistles // P*e* PRIMITIVE CHRISTIANITY IN PALES TINE AND SYRIA § CXLVI. THE ORIGIN OF THE JERUSALEM CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY Now when the disciples entered Jerusalem they went Return to the upper room where they were in the habit of staying. ^s*he There were Peter, John, James, Andrew, PhiUp and Thomas, <*lea Bartholomew and Matthew, James the son of Alphseus, Jem- Simon the Zealot, and Judas the son of James. All these (a™ men continued with one mind in earnest prayer, together 1I3") with the women, with Mary the mother of Jesus and his brothers. Now during those days Peter, standing up in the midst of choice the brothers— there was a crowd of about one hundred and ¦{££ twenty persons all together— said, Brothers, it is necessary ^°r that tiie scripture be fulfilled which the Holy Spirit spoke Judas beforehand by the mouth of David in regard to Judas, who acted as guide to those who seized Jesus. For it is written a°2') in the Book of Psalms Desolate be his habitation, And may no one dwell in it; also Let another man take over his office. Therefore it is necessary that of the men who have been associated with us, one should join us as a witness to his resurrection. So they put forward two men, Joseph, called Barsabbas (surnamed Justus), and Matthias. And they prayed, O Lord, who knowest well the hearts of all, do thou show clearly which of these two men thou hast chosen to take the place in this apostolic ministry from which Judas, through transgression, fell away, in order to go to his own 21 Iscari ot (I5-'«. ORIGIN OF THE JERUSALEM COMMUNITY place. Then they cast lots for them and the lot fell upon Matthias, who was assigned the place with the eleven apos tles. The Now when the day of Pentecost came, they were all to- 5£q" gether, when suddenly there came a sound from heaven ™*ri- like a violent rushing blast of wind which filled tiie whole tion house where they were seated. And they were all filled dayof with the Holy Spirit, and they began to speak in other Pente- tongues as the Spirit enabled them to express themselves. C2?-*.«. Now when this sound was heard the multitude gathered; ,,,u) and they were all amazed and perplexed, saying to one an other, What can it mean? But some others said sneeringly, They are brimful of new wine ! Peter's But Peter stood up along with the eleven, and raising his nation v°ice addressed them: Men of Judea and residents of acaon Jerusalem, let each of you understand this and listen at- ofthe tentively to what I say: these men are not drunk as you ciples suppose, for it is only nine in the morning! Rather this is (»M) what was predicted by the prophet Joel: And it shall be in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh, And your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, And your young men shall see visions, And your old men shall dream dreams, And yea, even upon slaves and slave-girls In those days I will pour out my Spirit, And they shall prophesy. And I will display wonders in the heavens above, And .signs on the earth below, Blood, fire, and vapor of smoke; The sun shall be changed into darkness, And the moon into blood, Before the great, illustrious day of the Lord comes. And every one who calls upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. dSth Men of I.srael» hear iiLese words: Jesus of Nazareth, a (jj.») man accredited to you by God through miracles, wonders, and signs which God performed by him in your midst, as 22 JESUS' DEATH AND RESURRECTION you yourselves know, this Jesus, delivered up in accor dance with God's settled purpose and foreknowledge, you by the hand of wicked men nailed to the cross and slew. But God raised him to life by checking the pangs of death His because it was not possible for him to be held by death, reckon For David says of him: ("-") I saw the Lord constantly before me, For he is at my right hand lest I be shaken. For this reason my heart is glad and my tongue exults, My flesh also shall rest in hope, Because thou wilt not leave my soul in the grave, Nor let thy holy one suffer decay. Thou hast made known to me the ways of life, Thou wilt fill me with gladness in thy presence. Brothers, I can speak freely to you about the patriarch David : he died and was buried and his tomb is with us to this day. Being a prophet and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him that he would seat one of his descen dants on his throne, he spoke with prophetic foresight of the resurrection of the Christ when he said that he was not left forsaken in the grave nor did his flesh suffer decay. This Jesus God raised to life as we all can bear witness. Exalted then by God's right hand, and having received His ex- from the Father tiie promised Holy Spirit, he hath poured on us this which you now see and hear. For it was not David who ascended to heaven, but David himself says, tlon'ofdivine authoiv The Lord said to my Lord, ' Sit at my right hand, i*y Until I put your enemies under your feet.' Therefore let all the house of Israel know beyond doubt that God hath made him both Lord and Christ, this very Jesus whom you have crucified. The Now when they heard this they were stung to the heart; effect alta^tionto a posi- they said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, Brothers, Peter's what are we to do? And Peter replied, Repent and be j^f*5 baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, in " order that your sins may be put away; then you will receive pK) 23 hishearers ORIGIN OF THE JERUSALEM COMMUNITY the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is intended for you and for your children and for all who are far off, for as many as the Lord our God may call to himself. And with many more appeals he solemnly warned and entreated them, saying, Save yourselves from this crooked generation! So those who accepted what he said were baptized and on that day about three thousand souls were added to them. I. The Return of the Disciples to Jerusalem. "Jesus lives and reigns on high" is the triumphant note with which the Gospels end and the history of the Apostolic Age begins. However the under lying historical facts may be conceived or psychologically interpreted in the light of the widely varying records, the vivid consciousness of Jesus' presence is one of the great impellmg forces throughout the apostolic period. At every point this consciousness explains what is otherwise inexplicable. It is the only sufficient answer to the question of why Jesus' disciples, who according to the oldest gospel record (cf. V, 298, 304) had fled to Galilee, terrified and heart-broken, suddenly returned, accompanied by over a hundred of his followers, to take up their permanent abode in Jerusalem. Their homes, their friends, and their occupations were all in Galilee; while Jerusalem was the centre of that Judaism which had rejected their Master and the home of the Pharisees who had hunted him out of Galilee. Here the Sadducean leaders, whose intrigues had placed him on the cross, ruled all but supreme. In returning to this city of tragic memories the followers of the crucified Nazarene had reason to expect only penury, peri], and persecution. Luke gives no direct explanation of their heroic action, for he follows the later traditions which overlook the humiliating fact that they had at first fled. Many have been the explanations offered by modern historians; but three closely related reasons appear to have influenced the disciples to take this perilous but important step. The first and chief reason was their absolute conviction that their Master was still living and in their midst. Paul declares that Jesus appeared not only to Peter and the Eleven but also to five hundred disci ples. This statement is supported by the important incidental testi mony of Acts l23- Joseph and Matthias, in the days preceding the memorable feast of Pentecost, are selected as apparently only two of the many who were witnesses of Jesus' resurrection, and Stephen and Paul appear to be the last to share these visions. No fear of danger could deter men into whose eyes the light of heaven had shone from 24 RETURN OF THE DISCIPLES TO JERUSALEM proclaiming that fact at the centre of their nation's life. These visions also confirmed them in the growing conviction that Jesus was beyond doubt the Messiah or Christ for which their race had long waited. Henceforth they unhesitatingly interpreted every utterance of Old Testament prophet, priest, or psalmist, which seemed to look forward to the work of the Messiah, as clear predictions of their Master and of the memorable era in which they were living. These marvellous experiences also seemed to them to confirm the popular Jewish apocalyptic beliefs, already strong in their minds, that Jesus as Messiah would soon come again with supernatural power to establish his rule on earth. The familiar prophecy of Malachi 31: "The Lord whom ye seek will suddenly come to his temple," undoubt edly seemed to them a direct divine promise pointing them the way to Jerusalem. It also explains most naturally why they spent so much time in those early days in the temple precincts and why the belief in the second coming of Jesus at first occupied a central place in their thought and life. It was easy for men who had just had visions of their risen and glorified Master to believe that he might at any moment appear in the heavens to proclaim and establish his visible kingdom on earth and to forget that he had declared that the Kingdom of God was not to come with observation but that it is within the hearts of hi3 followers (Luke 1721). A third and powerful motive impelling the disciples to go back to Jerusalem was their Master's own experience and example. His min istry had made tragically clear the limitations of the GaUlean field. His supreme courage and determination in going up to Jerusalem, even though well aware of the deadly perils that lurked there, were at last appreciated by his disciples in their true perspective. Now his task was theirs. Strait though the way be, they felt compelled to walk it. Only at Jerusalem could they touch the heart of their nation and bear witness most effectually to the work, the teachings, and the exaltation of their Master. Following his example, as at Capernaum, they aimed to establish a perfect brotherhood or community which would exem plify the principles of life that he had laid down and furnish the leaven needed to transform their nation. Thus their vision of their risen Master and the duty of announcing it to their nation, their expectation that he would speedily appear in the temple to inaugurate his mes sianic rule, and their obligation to establish at the historic place chosen by Jesus himself a miniature kingdom of God on earth were forces which drew his followers irresistibly to Jerusalem. 25 ORIGIN OF THE JERUSALEM COMMUNITY II. The Choice of a Successor to Judas. The consciousness of a great mission was evidently strong in the minds of the disciples who rallied at Jerusalem within less than a month and a half after Jesus' crucifixion. A common purpose united them: it was to make clear to all members of their race that he was indeed the promised Messiah and that his messiahship had been attested not merely by his wondrous words and deeds while on earth but by the repeated visions of him as their risen and glorified Lord. This was evidently the reason why they took steps to fill at once the place left vacant in the ranks of the Twelve by the renegade Judas, who, the variant traditions preserved in Matthew and Acts declare, had meantime met with a violent death. As far as the disciples were concerned, he had forfeited his life in the unique brotherhood the moment he betrayed their Master. The de mand now was for one who had not only associated personally with Jesus, and so was familiar with his words and deeds, but was also a witness to his resurrection. This requirement also suggests the prim itive definition of the term apostle, which was later applied to cer tain missionaries, like Paul, who were not included in the Twelve. Peter's speech on this occasion, as recorded in Acts, makes pathetically clear the perplexity of the disciples, suddenly deprived of the author itative leadership of their Master, and the simple faith with which in their extremity they turned to the Old Testament scriptures for gui dance. Any passage, which on its surface seemed to throw light on their present problems, quite regardless of its original meaning or ap plication, was accepted as a definite guide or prediction. For example, in the original of Peter's first quotation (from Psalms 69s6), the psalmist evidently had his many enemies in mind and prayed that their habita tion might be desolate; but to adapt it to the later situation their is changed to his in Acts l20. Matthias, who was chosen by lot to fill the ranks of the Twelve, shares the complete obscurity that has engulfed a majority of the dis ciples who were most closely associated with Jesus. One questions whether the surprising paucity of references to them in early Christian literature is purely accidental. As a whole, the men to whom Jesus intrusted his priceless teachings and example do not appear to have been gifted with marked ability. With the exception of Peter they were men of one talent. Peter's strength consisted in a simple straight forwardness and zeal rather than ii\ statesmanship or insight. With the exception of Peter, the leading apostles, Philip, Stephen, Barnabas, Silas, Apollos, and Paul, were enlisted entirely outside the ranks of the 26 CHOICE OF A SUCCESSOR TO JUDAS Twelve. The ultimate success of Jesus' work came not from the ability of his immediate followers but from the invincible power of his personality and teachings. Moreover, "the advance was not the result of design, but of the inherent universality of the new religion. It passed on from race to race by channels of its own making, and broke, with a living power, through every restriction which men had placed upon it." It is also important to note that among the first to rally at Jerusalem were Mary the mother of Jesus and his brothers. Paul alone of all the New Testament writers gives any hint as to how the immediate mem bers of Jesus' family were transformed into devoted followers in the few brief days that intervened between his death and the gathering of his disciples at Jerusalem. Paul in his account of the resurrection appear ances states (I Cor. 151"8) that after "Jesus had appeared to Peter, to the Twelve, and to upward of five hundred Christian brothers at once, he appeared to James." This James was beyond reasonable doubt the brother of Jesus who later became the head of the Jerusalem church. The evident importance that Paul attributes to James's vision is sig nificant. The order perhaps implies a certain causal relation between the visions of the older disciples and that which later came to James. In the absence of detailed records it is yet possible to supply the missing links. Up to the time of Jesus' crucifixion James did not believe that his brother was the promised Messiah. Therefore his conversion and absolute conviction that Jesus was the fulfilment of Israel's hopes and that the grave could not hold him must have made a profound impres sion on the other members of his family. Their presence among the disciples who gathered at Jerusalem indicates that at last even those of his own household appreciated his uniqueness. III. The Story of the Day of Pentecost. Effects point back unmistakably to corresponding causes. The later history of Chris tianity is in itself convincing evidence that the day of Pentecost was the occasion of a tremendous spiritual experience. The memory of Jesus' words, of his unquenchable hope, and of his calmness in the presence of death were all fresh in the minds of the multitudes. Time and meditation had given them a perspective that enabled them to appreciate him as never before. News of the remarkable experiences that had come to his disciples had spread aheady among the thronging pilgrims. Among the disciples themselves the first dejection had been followed by a joyous reaction characterized by intense religious emo tion. On the day of Pentecost this pent-up feeling broke out into an 27 ORIGIN OF THE JERUSALEM COMMUNITY irresistible wave of spiritual enthusiasm that marked the beginning of the world-wide Christian missionary movement. The story in Acts 2 represents the first-century memory and interpretation of this event. Like most of the biblical narratives, which record the epoch-making moments in the development of human faith, the original account has apparently been supplemented by later additions intended to emphasize its divine character and significance. Fortunately it bears on its face the evidences of its growth, so that it is possible to distinguish the original historical nucleus which lies back of it. The jeers of the bystanders who heard the cries of the assembled disciples, "They are brimful of new winel" suggest that what prompted their criticism was some form of religious ecstasy rather than coherent addresses delivered in various languages. This inference regarding the historical fact underlying the story of Pentecost is con firmed by Peter's speech, in which he explains the remarkable behavior of the disciples as a fulfilment of the prediction of the prophet Joel in which there is no suggestion of speaking in foreign languages. It is clear also in the latter part of the narrative that what converted the multitudes was not miracles nor divine signs but Peter's calm, logical, convincing sermon. In its present form three elements are traceable which apparently were not found in the original account of the event: (1) The sound from heaven like a violent rushing blast of wind which filled the whole house where the disciples were seated; (2) the tongues as of fire which ap peared distributed among them with one resting upon the head of each; and (3) their speaking with foreign tongues so that their words were clearly intelligible to the pilgrims present from the various lands of the dispersion. The Bible and contemporary Jewish literature contain certain suggestive analogies which go far to explain the presence of these secondary elements in this nativity story of the Christian church. The subsequent narrative of Acts 2 implies that the sound like a violent rushing blast of wind, which filled the whole house, was the mingled ecstatic shouts and cries of the disciples upon whose waiting hearts the divine Spirit from heaven had breathed. The same dramatic mode of description recurs in 431. In the mind of the one who has given us this narrative in its present form, the analogies between the giving of the law at Sinai and the pouring out of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost were very close. In the late priestly account of the scene at Sinai we read: "As Moses came down from the mount he did not know that the skin of his face was emitting rays of light because Jehovah had been 28 STORY OF THE DAY OF PENTECOST speaking with him" (Ex. 3429). Just as the divine light shining in the face of Jesus at his transfiguration seemed to transfuse and trans form all about him, so Acts 2 suggests that the joy and courage which filled the faces of the disciples appeared to rest like a divine radiance upon them. The statement that the disciples spoke in foreign tongues was either part of the Christian tradition or else is due to the editor's desire to picture the event in keeping with its larger historic signif icance. The story is apparently a reflection of the current rabbinical tradition of the giving of the law at Sinai, which states that the voice of God proclaimed the law in the seventy different languages that represented all the then known races of the earth. Back of this late account of the pentecostal experience lies the profound fact that the language of the emotions is intelligible alike to men of all races and tongues. Furthermore, Christianity from the first appealed even more strongly to the Jews of the dispersion — "Parthians, Medes, and Elamites" — who had returned as pilgrims to Jerusalem than to those of Palestine. It was this universal quality in Christianity that most interested the author of Acts 1-15 and he has dramatically set it forth at the beginning of his history. IV. The Coming of the Spirit. Interpreting the secondary ele ments according to their deeper spiritual significance, the historical nucleus that remains in the story of Acts 2 furnishes a remarkably vivid and satisfying record of the epoch-making experience that came to the Christian community at Pentecost. It does not represent the beginning of the Christian church, for that existed at least in germ from the moment that the disciples reassembled at Jerusalem. Its separation from Judaism and its independent existence still lay in the future. The memorable day of Pentecost marked for the Christian community a new consciousness of direct divine guidance. It also demonstrated the universality and potency of the gospel of Jesus. Modern religious psychology aids in the interpretation of this dramatic story. The feast of Pentecost had doubtless brought to" Jerusalem many followers and sympathetic hearers of Jesus. The re telling of the visions which many of them had had of the risen Christ undoubtedly strengthened the faith and kindled the religious en thusiasm of all. The feast of Pentecost also recalled the never-to-be- forgotten events of the feast of the Passover only fifty days before. These national feasts during Jesus' ministry had offered rare opportu nity for the presentation of his teachings, and the influence of the ex ample of their Master on this memorable occasion must have been 29 ORIGIN OF THE JERUSALEM COMMUNITY strongly felt by his disciples. It was in these circumstances that a divine enthusiasm seized them — an enthusiasm which henceforth for a generation at least characterized the life of the various Christian com munities scattered throughout the Roman world. Paul has vividly described its manifestations in I Corinthians 14. He found it necessary at a later period to urge the Corinthian Christians, when the impulse seized them to speak with tongues, to "let two or at the most three speak at one time. Also to let some one interpret. If there is no interpreter, let the speaker keep quiet in church and speak to himself and God." He also sought to guard the early Christians from the charge which was originally flung at them by the sneering Jewish multitudes at Jeru salem, when he declared that "if at a gathering of the whole church everybody speaks with tongues, and if outsiders and unbelievers come in, will they not say, 'You are insane' ? " The phenomenon was a famihar one in the ancient Oriental world. Saul, after his memorable interview with Samuel, falling in with a group of the sons of the prophets, was seized by the same divine enthusiasm. It appears to have been exceedingly common in the primitive guilds of the prophets. It is not without close analogies in the revivalistic services of modern times. Back of this experience lies the firmly established Jewish belief that the Spirit of God the Holy One, or, as it is designated in later Christian times, the Holy Spirit, took possession of certain men and women of open minds and directed their thoughts, their feelings, their words, and their very acts. Practically every extraordinary action or event not explained by ordinary causes was attributed to this direct divine influence. Jesus himself declared that by the Spirit of God he was able to perform miracles, and he appears to have quietly assumed that all that he did and accomphshed was by means of the same divine power working through him. The Spirit of God in He brew and early Christian thought was his divine power or personahty, active in nature, in human history, or working through the minds, the feelings, and the natures of his devoted foUowers. The great revival istic experience at Pentecost was, therefore, not the first in Israel's history. The unique element appears to have been the intensity with which it affected the assembled disciples, and the fact that practically all of them felt its mysterious influence. It was not strange that the simple followers of Jesus lacked the vocabulary and articulate means of expressing the new and profound emotions of joy and gratitude and loyalty which filled their souls, and that they voiced them in inarticu late cries which, when heard from afar, gave tiie impression of a mighty, 30 THE COMING OF THE SPIRIT rushing wind, and evoked from bystanders the sneering words: "These men are brimful of new wine I " V. Peter's Memorable Sermon. The amazement and sneers of the multitude gave Peter, the spokesman of the disciples, his oppor tunity. Throughout his brief address, which reflects the beliefs and ideas which were in the forefront at the beginning rather than at the end of the ApostoUc Age, when the book of Acts was written, there run two parallel lines of argument and evidence. The one is drawn from Old Testament prophecy; the other is based on the actual experience of Peter and of the disciples whom he represented. Speaking to Jews, he starts from the point of view of the Old Testament and singles out the memorable prediction of the outpouring of Jehovah's Spirit upon aU classes in the nation, which is found in Joel 228_32a. He follows the Greek translation, quoting rather freely and supplying the words "last days" in order to make complete the appUcation of the ancient pre diction to the events of the day of Pentecost. The latter part of the quotation shows how directly the disciples from the first drew their apocalyptic hopes from these Old Testament predictions. Then fol lows a remarkably vigorous epitome of Jesus' life and death condensed into one sentence. Peter's statement, "was delivered up in accordance with God's settled purpose and foreknowledge," implies that, as at later times, he had in mind the familiar portrait of the suffering servant of Jehovah in Isaiah 53. He, in common with the Jewish and Christian writers of his age, regarded David as the author of aU the Psalms. In his quotation from Psalm 168"11, and in his interpretation of the promise, Thou wilt not leave my soul in the grave, Nor let thy holy one see corruption, the logical appUcation depends not only upon the tradition of Davidic authorship, but also upon the Greek version, which he follows and which differs widely from the Hebrew: Thou wilt not forsake me to Sheol, Nor suffer thy faithful one to see the grave. Similarly the apostle, in keeping with the current rabbinical methods of Old Testament interpretation, cites the first verse of Psalm 110 (which is probably a Maccabean poem originally connected with 31 ORIGIN OF THE JERUSALEM COMMUNITY Simon the Hasmonean) as a prediction of Jesus' resurrection. In the light of our modern historical methods of interpretation the logic may be faulty, but that does not invalidate Peter's underlying argument, for this is but the way in which he sought to interpret his own spiritual experience and that of his fellow disciples. While Jesus was with them they had felt the divine inspiration of his personality and teach ings. Even when death had taken him from them, the vivid conscious ness of that same personality and presence had impelled them to come up to Jerusalem and face persecution. Now, not only in their own individual experiences but in a most startling and unmistakable manner they and the multitude which they addressed had seen with their own eyes the evidences of the work of the Spirit of God. To this argument of fact Peter added a strong appeal to the multi tude: "Repent and be baptized every one of you," that "you may then receive the gift of the Holy Spirit." Contrition, confession, and moral cleansing — these are the prehminary steps declared to be absolutely essential by the early prophets and John the Baptist, as weU as by Jesus and his apostles, if the individual would enter into intimate spiritual relations with God. In the preaching of Peter "the name of Jesus," which stands for his character, his spirit, and his teachings, has become that which inspires contrition and public confession and gives the assurance of moral cleansing and the abounding joy and spiritual exaltation that made the day of Pentecost forever memorable. It also explains why a large number, possibly somewhat magnified, were then added to the Christian brotherhood. VI. The Faith of the Early Christian Believers. Peter's speech, supplemented by those which follow in Acts, reveals the chief elements in the faith of the early Christian beUevers. Its fixed foun dation was their personal acquaintance and association with Jesus during his life on earth and the teachings, the ideals, and the spirit with which he had filled their minds. This is the historical corner stone upon which Christianity rests and without which it would be, like most other reUgions, but a system of philosophical speculations or a body of ethical teachings. The faith of the early believers was in evitably and radically moulded by the current hopes of their race and the predictions of their prophets. It had been so even while Jesus was with them to interpret this ancient heritage; it was naturally ever more so when they ceased to hear his audible voice. All the great early teachers of their race had taught them that their varied experi ences as a nation were but a preparation for a glorious destiny that 32 BELIEF OF THE EARLY CHRISTIANS awaited them and that a Messiah, chosen and empowered by God, was to be the chief agent in realizing this divine purpose and in inaugurating the new era in human history. Naturally and rightly they identified Jesus as the promised Messiah or Christ. This identification at once broadened their conception of the significance of his personality and work. Hitherto they had known him simply as their personal teacher and friend and master; now the historic term Messiah, with its wealth of associations, emphasized his relation to their race and to other races. At the same time the teachings of Jesus, as weU as their own interpre tation of their ancient scriptures, led them to the conclusion that they, the disciples of the Nazarene, were the faithful remnant, the true Israel. Hence they were the heirs of all the Old Testament promises. Not only were they to have a central place in the new and divine order, that they beUeved would speedily and miraculously be estab lished, but they had an all-important r61e in preparing the way for its consummation. AU their inherited beliefs and their past and present experiences focused their attention upon Jesus as the central figure in the new divine order. Now they saw him through their spiritual vision, Uving and exalted, not identical with God but commissioned by him to estabUsh this new order. Hence they caUed him not only Messiah but also Lord. "Jesus is Lord" was the baptismal formula of the early Christian church. Paul declares in I Corinthians 86: "For us there is one Lord, Jesus Christ." On the Ups of the early believers the term Lord had a far more personal and intimate meaning than Messiah or Christ. It corresponded to the older term Master, interpreted in the light of the larger perspective now attained by his disciples. It sug gested a broader yet closer personal relation between him and his de voted foUowers. It was a term not only of adoration but of devotion and fealty. It meant the acceptance of his teachings and ideals as the absolute rule of life and his Spirit as the ever-present interpreter and guide. The first great task, therefore, of his foUowers was, as Peter declares, to "let aU the house of Israel know beyond doubt that God hath made bim both Lord and Christ." 33 ICXLVH. THE: LIFE OF THE PRIMITIVE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY Intro- The believers all kept together and shared all things with tion: one another; and they would sell their possessions and goods <^yf and distribute the proceeds to all according as each man the be- had need. Daily with one accord they resorted to the (Acts8 temple and broke bread in their own homes. They ate their 2"-") food with gladness and single-heartedness, praising God, and were well regarded by all the people. The Lord also added daily to their number those who were being saved. The Now Peter and John were going up to the temple for the th£eof hour of prayer at three in the afternoon, when a certain J^e man who had been lame from birth was carried past, whom (31-8) they used to lay daily at what is called the Beautiful Gate of tiie temple to ask alms from those who entered the tem ple. When he saw that Peter and John were about to enter the temple, he asked them for alms. But Peter looked at him intently, as did John also, and said to him, Look at us. And when he gave heed to them, expecting to receive something from them, Peter said, I have neither silver nor gold but what I have I give to you. In the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, walk! Then seizing him by the right hand he raised him up. Instantly his feet and ankles became strong and he leaped upright and walked about, and went with them into the temple, walking, leap ing, and praising God. Effect And all the people saw him walking about and praising taeon God. And when they recognized that this was the man ?S?le wn0 used t0 sit anA beg at the Beautiful Gate of the temple, they were filled with awe and amazement at what had be fallen him. And while he still clung to Peter and John, all the people rushed awe-struck to them in what was called Solomon's Porch. peter-s But when Peter saw this he spoke to the people: Men %$fcn of Israel, why are you filled with awe at this? Or why do nnr'Scie you stare at us as tf we had made him waik bv any power (»¦«) or piety of our own? The God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob, the God of our fathers, 34 PETER'S EXPLANATION OF THE MIRACLE hath glorified Jesus his servant, whom you delivered up and disowned before Pilate, even though Pilate had de cided to release him. But you disowned the Holy and Just One, and you asked as a favor the release of a man who was a murderer; but the leader in the way of life you put to death. But God raised him from the dead, as we ourselves can bear witness. Moreover, through faith in his name, his name has given strength to this man whom you see and know; and it is the faith which he inspires that has made this man sound and strong in the presence of you all. Now I know, brothers, that you have acted in ignorance, Appeal as have also your rulers ; but it is in this way that God hath people fulfilled the promises which he made by the mouth of the to prophets that his Christ would suffer. Repent therefore and and turn that your sins may be blotted out, in order that je^uf* times of revival may come from the Lord, and that he may ("-") send to you Jesus tiie Christ, appointed beforehand, whom heaven must receive until the times of the restoration of which God hath spoken from of old by the lips of his holy prophets. Moses indeed said, ' The Lord our God will raise up a prophet for you from among your brothers, as he raised me. You must listen to whatever he may say to you; any soul that will not listen to this prophet shall be utterly destroyed from among the people.' Yea, all the prophets who have spoken since Samuel and his succes sors have also announced these days. You indeed are the sons of the prophets and of the covenant which God made with your fathers when he said to Abraham, 'All the fam ilies of the earth shall be blessed through your offspring.' It was for you first that God raised up his servant and sent him to bless you by turning each of you from your wicked deeds. While they were speaking to the people, the priests and Arrest the commander of the temple and the Sadducees came upon apo&-e them, being greatly displeased because they taught the ^f2) people and proclaimed in the case of Jesus the resurrection from the dead. The next morning a meeting was held in Jerusalem of their rulers, elders, and scribes, at which were the high 35 THE PRIMITIVE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY Their priest Annas, Caiaphas, John, Alexander, and all the mem- !£d bers of the high priest's family. Placing the apostles in defense fl^ir midst, they inquired, By what power and in whose name have you done this? Then Peter, filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them: Rulers of the people and elders of Israel, if we are being examined to-day for a good act done to a man helplessly lame, as to how this man was cured, be it known to you all, and to all the people of Israel, that through the name of Jesus Christ the Nazarene, whom you crucified but whom God hath raised from the dead- through that name this man stands before you perfectly whole. This Jesus is the stone despised by you builders which has become the head of the corner. And in none other is there salvation: for neither is there any other name under heaven, that has been given among men, through which we may be saved. Be- Now, when they saw the boldness of Peter and John ofthe and perceived that they were uncultured and illiterate men, a/pos- they were astonished; they also recognized that they had (i3,u,21. been companions with Jesus. But, seeing the man who had been healed standing beside them, they had nothing to say in reply. But when they had threatened them still further, they let them go, being unable to find any way of punishing them on account of the people, for everybody was glorifying God over what had happened; for the man was over forty years of age on whom this miracle of healing had been performed. Prayer Now, when they were released, the disciples went to Christ their friends and reported what the high priest and elders Jjfc£_ had said. And on hearing this, these all lifted up their munity voices to God and said, O Sovereign Lord, thou art he who co^.. made heaven and earth and sea and all that in them is, (fS..... who said t0 our fathers by the Holy Spirit through the »°) mouth of David thy servant : ' Why did the Gentiles rage, And the peoples form futile plans? The kings of the earth set themselves in array, And the rulers assemble together i Against the Lord and his Christ.' 36 !2) The divineanswer AN EARLY CHRISTIAN PRAYER And now, O Lord, consider their threats and grant that thy servants may with all fearlessness speak thy word, when thy hand is stretched out to heal and to perform miracles and wonders by the name of thy holy servant Jesus. And while they were praying the place where they were was shaken, and they were filled with the Holy Spirit and continued speaking tiie word of God fearlessly. And the <"•") apostles gave their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus with great power, and much grace was upon them all. Now in the multitude of the believers there was but one Fra- heart and soul; not one of them called any of the things ^t1 which he possessed his personal property, but they shared g^6 all they had with one another. There was not a needy per- tianS" son among them, for those who owned land or houses sold munity them and brought the proceeds of the things which were ("¦**- sold and laid them at the apostles' feet. It was then dis tributed to every one according as each individual had need. Thus Joseph, who was surnamed by the apostles Barnabas or, as it may be interpreted, ' Son of encouragement,' a Levite, a native of Cyprus, sold a farm belonging to him and brought the money and placed it at the apostles' feet. But a certain man by the name of Ananias who, with his pecep- wife Sapphira, had sold some property, with her connivance A°°.of kept back part of the price and brought only a part of it to £jg lay at the apostles' feet. Ananias, said Peter, why has lap- Satan filled your heart that you should try to deceive the PjjSS) Holy Spirit and keep back part of the price of the land? While the land remained unsold was it not your own? And even after it was sold was it not at your disposal? How is it that you have planned this thing in your heart? You have not lied to man but to God. When Ananias heard these words he fell down and expired; and great fear came upon all who heard it. And the younger men arose, wrapped up the body, and carried it away to be buried. After an interval of about three hours, his wife came in, not knowing what had taken place. Tell me, said Peter to her, did you sell the land for such and such a sum? Yes, she said, that was the sum. But Peter said to her, How was it that you two could agree together to test the Lord's Spirit? Behold 37 (12-1.) THE PRIMITIVE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY the footsteps of those who have buried your husband! They are at the door and will carry you out! Instantly she fell down at his feet and expired. And the young men came in and found her dead, and they carried her out and buried her beside her husband. And great awe came over the whole church and over all who heard about these things. Effect Many miracles and wonders were performed among the 3?eon people by the apostles, and they were all with one accord peoirte in Solomon's Porch. But, although the people extolled them, none of the rest of the people dared join them. But instead multitudes of both men and women who believed in the Lord were brought in, so that they even carried in valids out into the streets and laid them on beds and mattresses, that when Peter passed, his shadow at least might fall on some one of them. Crowds also gathered from the towns about Jerusalem, bringing invalids and peo ple troubled with unclean spirits; and all of them were healed. I. The Historical Record. The occasional secondary passages in this section but serve to bring out by contrast the exact historical character of the older source here quoted. The general statements regarding the life of the Christian community, found in the closing verses of Acts 2, are probably from Luke's own pen. Verse 45, in its assertion that "they shared all that they had with one another," an ticipates the detailed statement of 4?2-5u and to a certain extent is at variance with the testimony of this older and fuUer source. The fourth verse of chapter 4, with its statement that the Christian com munity numbered about five thousand, is probably also an editorial addition, for it breaks the close connection between 3 and 5. Verses 15-20 0f ^ Same chapter appear to be an expansional duplicate of 12-14, 21, 22 "pjjg reason for the Uberation of the apostles given in a is the high priest's fear of a popular uprising, but in 16-20 they are repre sented as admitting the validity of the miracle which had been performed in the temple. Verses 27 and 28 also break the close connec tion between 26 and 29, and have all the characteristics of an explana tory clause. Otherwise the material in this section appears to have been taken from the early Jerusalem-Csesarean source. It is of the greatest historical value in portraying not only the life of the primitive Christian community but also the faith of the early disciples, while 38 THE HISTORICAL RECORD they still stood under the direct influence of Jesus' work and teach ings and had not been fundamentaUy influenced by Paul's dominating ideas. II. The Healing of the Lame Beggar. The book of Acts as cribes only three definite miracles of healing to the twelve disciples, and each of these is associated with the name of Peter. The gospel nar ratives state that miracles of healing were performed by the disciples during Jesus' lifetime, but furnish no details beyond recording the case of the epileptic (Mark 917-23) which had baffled them. Jesus himself appears to have anticipated that they would carry on his work of heal ing. The Fourth Gospel has expressed this conviction in the familiar passage: "He who beUeves on me also shaU do the works that I do, and greater works than these shall he do" (John 1412). The account of Peter's healing of the lame man in the temple is given in great detail. The situation suggests the experiences that reinforced the man's faith. Being a frequent visitor to the temple, he must have often heard the teachings and observed the acts of healing performed by Jesus. Also the news of the great spiritual experience which came to the disciples on the day of Pentecost must have filled Jerusalem, The conditions therefore were exceedingly favorable for a startling act of healing. The incident is in every respect paraUel to many of the weU-authen- ticated gospel miracles, except that Peter acted simply as the agent working in the name of Jesus. There is every reason for regarding the narrative as historical. The event was also of great importance in extending the work of the disciples. It was the credential required by the masses to prove by the testimony of their eyes that the Crucified One stiU Uved. Peter was quick to improve the unique opportunity thus offered. Here was the supreme answer to the taunts of the people that his Master had died an ignominious death on the cross. Boldly Peter turns upon the multitude and accuses them of being the mur derers of Jesus whom he designates as "the Holy and Just One," "God's servant" who had proved the "leader in the way of life." Each of these designations is rich in suggestiveness. The first is an echo of Isaiah 53 and anticipates the theme developed by Peter a little later. The second suggests the initial impression which Jesus' personality had made upon his disciples and upon all who had known him personally. The third title, with marvellous insight, describes him as the pioneer, the first to discover the boundless possibilities of life and to Uve it in its fulness. This phrase is nobly interpreted in the Fourth Gospel in the words attributed to Jesus: "You shall have 39 THE PRIMITIVE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY life and that abundantly" (John IO10). The once helpless cripple, who now stood before the multitude sound and strong, was a convincing proof of Jesus' power to give not only spiritual but physical life to those whose faith enabled them to reach out and receive it. III. Peter's Interpretation of the Old Testament Prophecies. The words with which Peter appealed to the multitude reveal great tact and, what is more important, a yearning love for them such as had filled the heart of Jesus: "Brothers, I know that you have acted in ignorance, as have also your rulers." The implied distinction be tween the responsibility of the common people and of their rulers was weU supported by the facts. Peter's declaration that "God hath ful filled the promises which he made by the mouth of the prophets that his Christ would suffer" is one of the many indications contained in these early records that the disciples found the explanation of the meaning of Jesus' death in the II Isaiah's portrait of the suffering ser vant of Jehovah. Peter reiterated John the Baptist's call to repen tance, but made the motive not merely individual forgiveness but that God might send to them "Jesus the Messiah, whom heaven must re ceive until the times of the restoration of which God hath spoken from of old by the lips of his holy prophets." Again the impression is deep ened that the apostles' firmly fixed conviction of Jesus' speedy second coming to accomplish by supernatural means what he seemed to have left undone, was derived not from their Master's words but from their perusal of the Old Testament prophecies under the influence of the current Jewish apocalyptic hopes. In Acts 3U Peter plainly states the principle that guided the apostles in their interpretation of these ancient scriptures: "Yea, all the prophets who have spoken since Samuel and his successors have announced these days." These typ ical early apostolic sermons in the opening chapters of Acts iUustrate their tendency to ignore the historical background and the immediate application of these Old Testament prophecies and to apply aU, which seemed apposite, to Jesus and to the age in which they were Uving. Their interpretation, however, of the meaning of Jesus' work and teaching to them and to all Jews who beUeved is of incomparable value. Peter's closing words in 3™ are the simplest and clearest statement of primitive apostolic faith to be found in the New Testament: "It was for you first that God raised up his servant and sent him to bless you by turning each of you from your wicked deeds." Here, as in the oldest gospel records, Jesus is recognized to be the personal Friend and Teacher and Saviour of men. His saving work is done in the lives of 40 PETER'S INTERPRETATION OF PROPHECY men by delivering them from the bondage of the evil habits and ideals engendered by their past deeds. IV. Peter's Defense before Jesus' Murderers. Acts is a book of striking contrasts. The event soon proved that "the disciples were not above their Lord." The conspirators and leaders of the Jewish nation who had plotted to encompass Jesus' death now interrupted Peter's earnest address. At their head was the commander of the temple pohce, or segan, who was the official representative of the high- priestly authorities. It was his duty to maintain order in the temple precincts, and the apostle's bold words gave him and the Sadducees whom he represented an excuse for sUencing Peter. Deeper than their opposition to the doctrine of the resurrection, which Peter im- pUcitly taught, was probably their recognition that he was the spokes man of the despised and crucified Nazarene. The informal meeting which was held the foUowing morning was in many respects closely similar to the preUminary investigation of Jesus which these same high-priestly officials had instituted in order to secure data for a formal charge. It was again a packed tribunal dominated by Annas, Caiaphas, John (in the Western text D, Jonathan), and Alexander. Jonathan was a son of Annas, as was probably also Alexander; at least the narrative of Acts distinctly states that aU the members of the high priest's family were present. Peter's reply to their demand that he explain by what authority he had performed the miracle was probably suggested by Jesus' reply to the Pharisees on a sinnlar occasion: "Is it lawful on the sabbath day to do good or to do harm, to save life or to kiU ? " (Mark 31"6.) Psalm 11822 furnished Peter the figure with which he proclaimed the power of his risen Lord: "This Jesus is the stone despised by you builders which has become the head of the corner." Again it is an echo of Jesus' words recorded in Mark 1210. Peter's closing assertion anticipates Paul's interpretation of the significance of Jesus' person- aUty and work. It is probable that here, as elsewhere in the Old and New Testaments, the name is not used in a magic sense but to de scribe the character, aims, spirit, and methods of its possessor. Out of the depths of his own personal experience Peter declared that the spirit and teachings which his Master exemplified present the only way in which men of aU races and ages may come into Uving and personal relations with their heavenly Father and attain the real goals of all Uving. V. The Effect of the Release of Peter and John upon the Christian Community. The grafting high priests were naturaUy 41 THE PRIMITIVE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY eager to silence the disciples of the Nazarene Teacher who had dared publicly to condemn their corrupt administration of the temple. The Sadducean nobles cared little about questions of orthodoxy. They evidently regarded the apostles as mad fanatics, followers of a Galilean Messiah, who might arouse the people unduly, and their aim was to intimidate them. There was, however, in the apostles' teaching no trace of disloyalty to the law or temple ritual or note of sedition, and for the moment they had the approval of the multitude. Hence the temple authorities, who depended largely on the support of the mob, could only let them go free. To the foUowers of Jesus this meant a great victory. Their leaders had openly faced the murderers of Jesus, had borne testimony to their Master's resurrection, and the crowds in the temple had upheld them. Here was another signal iUustration of their conviction that the Spirit of God was working mightily in their midst. The prayer in 423-26- 29. 30 may well have come down directly from the early Christian community. It fits most perfectly its pres ent historical setting. Its spirit and thought are characteristic of the primitive Christians. Psalm 21- 2, with its world-wide vision, seemed none too exalted to express their exultation and thanksgiving. The closing lines of the prayer breathe the spirit that actuated the early Christian martyrs and voice their consciousness of a mighty mission as the servants of God to proclaim the teachings and do the great work that God's holy servant Jesus had intrusted to them. As in chapter 2, Luke graphically describes the overmastering ecstasy which seized them by the statement that "the place where they were was shaken and they were filled with the Holy Spirit." This profound spiritual experience also inspired them with new zeal and courage in proclaim ing the divine truth intrusted to them and in bearing testimony to Jesus' resurrection. VI. The Communistic Tendencies of the Believers. The gen eral statements at the close of chapter 2 have been popularly inter preted to mean that the primitive Christian community at Jerusalem lived together on a thoroughly communistic basis. Luke may have wished to convey this impression. He himself would probably have commended such a social organization, for his sympathies, as revealed in his gospel, are strongly communistic; but the popular interpre tation is not borne out by the older sources which he has incorporated in Acts. These nowhere state that all oi the believers put all of their wealth in the common treasury. Instead it is implied that those who did so wholly or in part were highly commended for their excep- 42 COMMUNISTIC TENDENCIES tional generosity. Thus Barnabas, a Jew from the Island of Cyprus, who claimed Levitical descent and who later became an active apostle, sold a farm belonging to him and turned the proceeds into the common fund. The record does not even indicate that he sold all the property that he possessed. Peter's words to Ananias also plainly and de cisively indicate that no one was under any compulsion to seU his per sonal property or to turn any or all into the apostolic treasury. The absence of any trace of communism in the later history of Palestinian Christianity or elsewhere in the early Christian church, until the alien tendencies toward asceticism and monasticism gained a foothold within it, substantiates the testimony of Acts. AU the more significant, therefore, is the spirit of generosity and practical brotherhood that inspired these primitive Christian beUevers. Not under the com pulsion of a social compact or institution, but prompted simply by the spirit of their Master, "they called none of the things which they possessed their own, but shared all things with one another." The social ideals that Jesus had held up before his foUowers and tried to apply practicaUy in the Ufe of the closely knit community that Uved around the northern shores of the Sea of GaUlee were being reaUzed. WhUe his influence upon them was still freshest and strongest they UteraUy did to others as they would have others do to them. What Luke records is simply a practical application of Jesus' social teachings. Undoubtedly the beUevers' expectation of the speedy second coming of their Master was also the background of this unique social life; but it is weU that the Christian church has ever held up before it a concrete iUustration of what the teachings of Jesus can do and yet wiU do for society, as weU as for its individual citizens. Jesus saved Zaccheus, the tax coUector of Jericho, by influencing him to give back in generous measure what he had stolen from society. Barnabas and other Jeru salem citizens Uke him represent a stiU higher stage in that sociaUzing process which Jesus aimed to perfect in every man. The social leaven which he had implanted in the heart of Judaism was beginning to work silently but rapidly in an ever-widening circle. VII. The Story of Ananias and Sapphira. This story has been regarded by many historians as apocryphal. In the form in which it has come to us tradition may have heightened certain details, as, for example, the immediate death of Ananias and Sapphira on the dis covery of their deceit; or they may have been afflicted with acute heart-disease. One thing is certain: the narrative comes from one of the earner sources, for it impUcitly disproves the general statement 43 THE PRIMITIVE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY of the editor that "the believers shared all they had with one an other" (Acts 245). The apostles, like the ancient Hebrew prophets (e. g., Amos's doom upon Amaziah, Amos 717, or Isaiah's definite prediction of the fate of Shebna, Isaiah 2215"19), appear to have proclaimed the doom awaiting especially guilty offenders. Thus Paul in I Corinthians 55 declared regardmg a member of the Corinthian church who was guilty of gross social immorality: "By the power of our Lord Jesus Christ I here consign that individual to Satan for the destruction of his flesh .in order that his spirit may be saved on the day of our Lord Jesus." The sin of Ananias and Sapphira appears to have been their attempt to deceive their fellow Christians by retaining part of the proceeds from the sale of the land which they had donated to the community. Confronted by this evidence of disloyalty to the teachings of Jesus, Peter could not have refrained from a scathing condemnation, and it could not have faUed to make a profound impression upon the pathetic pair who were making such a disastrous attempt to serve both God and mammon. Whenever, whether at once or later, death overtook the culprits, it would be inevitably regarded as a divine judgment. It is important to note, however, that the story does not claim to recount a miracle; it simply aims to illustrate by contrast the powerful social spirit that inspired the Christian community and to point an exceed ingly important moral. VIII. The Religious Life of the Jerusalem Christians. Help fulness, hopefulness, unselfishness, and joyfulness characterized the life of the early Jerusalem community. In the days immediately fol lowing the great revival at Pentecost it was in a very true sense a partial realization of Jesus' ideal of the Kingdom of God on earth. All its members were bound together by a common loyalty to their heavenly Father and a single-minded devotion to the ideals of their Master. Daily they worshipped together in the temple; each meal in their homes was apparently eaten in commemoration of their dead but risen Lord. Together they constituted one large family united by a spirit of good-will and generosity and the consciousness of a great mission. The beauty of their common life and the teachings of the apostles attracted many Jews to their ranks. The step for them was easy, for the Twelve had no thought of a break with Judaism. They regarded the scriptures of their race and the service of the temple as essential foundations of their faith. The new elements in their beUef simply represented the last chapter in God's revelation to his people. Instead of separating from their fellow Jews, they sought to attract all 44 THE RELIGIOUS LIFE members of their race to themselves, the true Israel, The idea of a mission to the Gentiles outside Judaism was equally alien to the thought of the Twelve, although they would doubtless have welcomed pros elytes who came to them, even as did the strictest of the Jews. Acts 512-16 SUggests that in time they had fallen into an entanglement which Jesus in the early Galilean days had carefully avoided. The reputa tion which the apostles had gained through healing the lame man in the temple courts attracted to them credulous multitudes of men and women afflicted with physical and mental maladies. If the narrative be accepted as strictly historical, it is evident that this popular credu lity passed over into superstition. It is significant tha\ at this point the record of the successful preaching work of the Twelve in Jerusalem suddenly ceases. Henceforth the interest centres in the group of HeUenistic Jews, gifted with a larger outlook, whose work led ulti mately to the breaking of Jewish bonds and the expansion of Christian ity into a world reUgion. The important fact to be noted, however, is that the vital force in the life of the primitive church was not its ritual or its ceremonial forms but the common beliefs and the mutual love and spirit of service which bound aU together into one great fam ily and attracted to their ranks the many who felt the crying spiritual and social needs that Christianity, thus simply and concretely inter preted, was able to supply. The early Christian church was but an extension of the unique brotherhood which Jesus had established during his active GaUlean days. What was true of Christianity at first has proved true throughout its history: its significant and lasting conquests have been won through the personal touch and through fellowship in faith, in love, and in service. §CXLVm. THE WORK AND DEATH OF STEPHEN Now during those days, when the disciples were increas- The ing in number, the Hellenists (the Greek-speaking Jews) p?Int- began to complain against the Hebrews (who were natives ^e^e and residents in Palestine) because their widows were seven being overlooked in the daily distribution of food. There- k-f) fore the Twelve called together the main body of the dis ciples and said, It is not fitting that we should neglect preach ing the word of God in order to serve meals. Brothers, select seven of your own number, men of good reputation, full of the Spirit and of wisdom, whom we will place in 45 WORK AND DEATH OF STEPHEN charge of this matter; but we will continue to devote our selves to prayer and the ministry of the word. This plan met with the approval of the whole body. Accordingly, they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and the Holy Spirit, Philip, Prochorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas, and Nic olaus, a proselyte from Antioch. These men they set be fore the apostles, who after praying laid their hands upon them. in- And the word of the Lord spread and the number of the ofe^ disciples in Jerusalem increased greatly and a large number cii>ies 0f priests became obedient to the faith. The Now Stephen, who was full of grace and power, performed agSt great wonders and miracles among the people. But some s{£-n of those who belonged to the so-called synagogue of the ("e-S" Libyians and Cyrenians and the Alexandrians, and also the natives of Cilicia and the Roman province of Asia began to dispute with Stephen, and they were not able to meet the wisdom and spirit with which he spoke. Then they instigated certain men to say, We have heard him speak ing blasphemous words against Moses and God. Thus they stirred up the people, the elders and the scribes so that they rushed upon him and seized him and took him before the Sanhedrin. They also set up false witnesses who said, This man never ceases talking against this holy place and the law. Indeed we have heard him say that this Jesus the Nazarene will destroy this place and change the customs handed down to us by Moses ! His Then all who were seated in the Sanhedrin fixed their before8 eYes on him and saw that his face shone like the face of an stahe- ^g61- But the big11 priest said, Are these things so? drin Stephen replied, Brothers and fathers, listen: The God of s'16-76' glory appeared to our father Abraham while he was still in Mesopotamia, before he dwelt in Haran, and said to him, ' Go forth from thy land and from thy kinsmen and come to the land which I will show thee.' Then, leaving the land of the Chaldeans, he stayed in Haran. After his father's death, God moved him into this land where you now dwell. But he did not give him any inheritance in it nor even a foot of land. He did, however, promise that he would give it as a possession to him and to his descendants after him, 46 STEPHEN'S ADDRESS although as yet he was childless. So Abraham became the father of Isaac, whom he circumcised on the eighth day. And Isaac was the father of Jacob, and Jacob of the twelve patriarchs. And the patriarchs were jealous of Joseph and sold him God's into Egypt. But God was with him and delivered him out guper' of all his troubles and gave him favor and wisdom in the ote£hfg presence of Pharaoh, king of Egypt, who appointed him by°pe governor over Egypt and over all his own household. But (Sf£ph a famine came over the whole land of Egypt and Canaan and great misery so that our forefathers could find no food. But Jacob, hearing that there was food in Egypt, sent our forefathers there for the first time. And on their second visit, Joseph made himself known to his brothers, and Pharaoh was informed regarding Joseph's lineage. Then Joseph sent and invited his father Jacob and all his family, amounting to seventy-five persons. So Jacob went down into Egypt. But as the time drew near for the fulfilment of the prom- Their ise made to Abraham, the people grew and multiplied in ^llnce Egypt, until another king arose in Egypt who knew not ^v Joseph. He, adopting a crafty policy toward our race, op- (»-«) pressed our forefathers by making them expose their infants so that they might not live. At this time Moses was born, a divinely beautiful child, and for three months he was cared for in his father's house. Then he was exposed but Pharaoh's daughter adopted him and brought him up as her own son. So Moses was educated in all the learning of the Egyptians and was a man strong in speech and action. When he had completed his fortieth year, it oc curred to him to visit his kinsmen, the children of Israel. Seeing one of them being unjustly treated, he took his part and avenged the man who was being unjustly treated by striking down the Egyptian. He supposed that his kins men knew that by him God was going to bring them deliv erance: but they did not understand. Next day he came upon two of them fighting. And he tried to make peace between them, saying, ' Men, you are brothers ! Why injure one another? ' But the man who was injuring his neighbor pushed him away, saying, ' Who made you ruler 47 WORK AND DEATH OF STEPHEN and judge over us? Do you want to kill me as you killed the Egyptian yesterday? ' At this speech Moses fled and became a resident alien in the land of Midian, where he became the father of two sons. At the close of forty years an angel appeared to him in the flame of a burning thorn bush in the wilderness of Mount Sinai. When Moses saw this he marvelled at the sight; but as he went up to look at it, the voice of the Lord said, ' I am the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob.' Trem bling with fear, Moses did not dare to look. And the Lord said to him, ' Take thy sandals off thy feet, for the place where thou art standing is sacred ground. I have indeed seen the oppression of my people in Egypt. I have heard their groans and I have come down to deliver them. Come now, I will send thee back to Egypt.' That Moses whom they rejected, saying, ' Who made you a ruler and judge over us? ' — that was the very man whom God sent to rule and redeem them by the help of the angel who appeared to him in the bush. He it was who led them forth, doing wonders and signs in the land of Egypt, at the Red Sea, and in the wilderness for forty years. This is the Moses who said to the children of Israel, 'God will raise up a prophet for you from among your brotherhood, as he raised me.' Their This was the man who at the assembly in the wilderness jfo^jn intervened between the angel who spoke to him on Mount wilder- Sinai and our fathers; he received Uving words to be given Sesser~ to us. But our forefathers would not submit to him, but ("'") pushed him aside and in their hearts hankered for Egypt. They said to Aaron, ' Make for us gods that they may march in front of us! As for this Moses who led us out of Egypt, we do not know what has become of him!' Moreover they made a calf in those days, offered sacrifice to this idol, and rejoiced over what their own hands had made. So God turned from them and gave them up to the worship of the host of heaven. God's In the wilderness our forefathers had the tent of testi- skSnlor mony, made as he who spoke to Moses had instructed him tfc>£ to make it after the pattern he had seen. This also our Bhip forefathers in their turn brought in with Joshua when they <"-"> took possession of the territory of the nations whom God 48 THE WORSHIP OF THE EARLY ISRAELITES drove out before them. So it remained until the days of David. He found favor with God and asked that he might provide a dwelling for the God of Jacob. But it was Solor mon who built him a house. Yet the Most High doth not dwell in houses made with hands. As the prophet says: Heaven is my throne, And the earth is a footstool for my feet! What kind of house will ye build for me, saith the Lord? Or what resting place shall I have? Did not my hand make all this? Stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, you are always resisting the Holy Spirit! As with your fore- Tantde" fathers, so with you ! Which of tiie prophets did your fore- ™"£ fathers not persecute? They also killed those who an- ^tti-ve nounced beforehand the coming of the Just One, whose SJeeof betrayers and murderers you have become — you who re- Jews ceived the law given through angels and yet have not obeyed it! When they heard this they were furious and gnashed their teeth at him. But he, full of the Holy Spirit, gazed up into |fJe"n'S heaven and saw the glory of God and Jesus standing at the »J right hand of God. Behold, I see heaven open, he said, s») ' and the Son of Man standing at the right hand of God. But they with a loud shriek shut their ears and rushed at him in a body. Dragging him outside the city, they stoned him. And the witnesses laid their clothes at the feet of a youth called Saul. So they stoned Stephen while he prayed, Lord Jesus receive my spirit! Then kneeling down he cried with a loud voice, Lord, let not this sin stand against them! And when he had said this, he fell asleep. But certain devout men buried Stephen and made loud lamen tation over him. I. The Story of Stephen's Martyrdom. This story marks an important stage in the history of the Apostolic Age. It contains the first suggestion of a rift between the Jewish and Hellenistic elements in the Jewish Christian community. The only explanation of its presence in a writing, the irenical purpose of which is so evident as 49 WORK AND DEATH OF STEPHEN that of Acts, is that the narrative was originally drawn from an older and probably written source. The facts presented in this narrative have only the most general and loose relation to those found in the preceding chapters. The speech attributed to Stephen in chapter 7 is also the longest in the book. Its thought and argument have no close parallel in the New Testament except in the book of Hebrews. It is clearly the work of a Jew familiar with the contemporary rabbin ical interpretations of the older scriptures. Thus, for example, it is stated that an angel spoke to Moses on Mount Sinai and that the law was ordained by angels (Acts 7s8, B). These are detaUs of later Jewish tradition which would naturally be unknown to a Greek Uke Luke, except as he found them incorporated in some eariier source. Further more, the discourse attributed to Stephen is not closely connected with its context. It is not so much a defense as a part of a discussion such as Stephen is reported (in Acts 69, 10) to have carried on in the synst- gogues of the Greek-speaking Jews. The only satisfactory explana tion of its presence is that it was preserved and associated with the name of Stephen. These and other reasons indicate that this story of his martyrdom is one of the oldest narratives in the first part of the book of Acts. It certainly furnishes invaluable data for the interpre tation of this great turning-point in the life of the early Christian com munity. II. The Appointment of the Seven. The dramatic account of the day of Pentecost implies that many Jews of the dispersion were early attracted to the Christian community. This conclusion is con firmed by Acts 6. It was natural that the teachings and principles of Jesus should appeal more strongly to the Hellenistic Jews (that is, to the Greek-speaking Jews who had been born and reared beyond the bounds of Palestine) than to those of Palestine. Their contact with the larger Greek world had opened their minds to new truths and had developed a receptive attitude. As a whole, they were mentally more alert and better educated. Throughout all their history the Jews of the dispersion had shown themselves more friendly toward new ideas. Thus, for example, they alone accepted the so-called apocryphal books of the Old Testament, while the Palestinian Jews rejected them from their canon. Some of these Hellenistic Jews were probably temporary residents in Jerusalem, simply as pilgrims, while others, having acquired a competence, had returned, like many of the Jews to be found in Jerusalem to-day, to spend the remainder of their life under the shadow of the temple. The Jews of Palestine, on the other hand, were, as a 50 THE APPOINTMENT OF THE SEVEN rule, self-satisfied and inclined to look down upon tlie other members of their race, whom they regarded as contaminated by contact with the heathen and by long residence in foreign lands. They also viewed askance their more tolerant attitude toward Greek culture and life and the customs of the outside world. It was probably this inherited and inbred attitude that led the Palestinian Jewish Christians to neglect the needy members of the Hellenistic group. The apostles' evident ignorance of this tendency indicates that the neglect was the fault of the humbler members of the community, to whom was doubtless intrusted the task of serving food. Such differences are often more marked the lower the individuals stand in the social scale. The evU was suffi cient, however, to attract the attention of the leaders in the Helle nistic group and to induce them to lay the matter before the Twelve. When it was brought to their attention, they settled it in the fairest and simplest way. They rightly maintained that they themselves should not neglect their work of preaching to serve tables. Accord ingly they requested the HeUenists to select seven of their most re- Uable and spiritually minded leaders to look out for the interests of their group. This proposal was commended by the entire Christian community. The method adopted in meeting this difficulty also il lustrates the democratic spirit that actuated the Christian beUevers in all their relations with each other. The Greek names of the seven, as weU as the narrative, indicate that they were probably aU HeUenistic Jews by birth. It is a mistake to regard them as the prototypes of the later order of deacons. Rather they appear to have been a committee appointed to represent the Hel lenistic group in the Christian community in very much the same way as the apostles represented the Palestinian group. They were chosen apparently not because of their age but for their ability. Their ap pointment did not estabUsh a new office but rather met practicaUy a pressing need. As the event proved, the men appointed were of such signal abiUty that they soon showed themselves qualified to do far more than serve tables. Certain of them soon surpassed the Twelve as preachers and controversiaUsts and won a leading place among the apostles who proclaimed the teachings and works of Jesus to the Jewish and Gentile world. Their appointment is a convincing proof that the rift between the Palestinian and HeUenistic Jews, even within the Christian community, was practicaUy inevitable, and that it was recognized long before Paul entered upon his campaign to liberate Gentile Christians from Jewish bonds. 51 WORK AND DEATH OF STEPHEN III. Stephen's Discussions with the Hellenistic Jews. It is difficult to determine how much time is represented by the narrative of Acts 6 and 7. It may have been a year or more. During this period Stephen had evidently become the recognized leader and spokesman of the seven and had developed an apostolic abiUty which for a time even ecUpsed that of Peter himself. There was apparently a tacit and amicable division of the field between the Twelve and the seven. Stephen worked where the Twelve were only partiaUy effective, that is, among the HeUenistic Jews. The narrative indicates that, instead of confining his speeches to the temple courts, he went into their synar gogues, not to preach but, after the method so much beloved by the Greeks, to engage in open discussion with their elders. The fact that he first entered the synagogues whose membership was made up of HeUenists from the Jewish colonies in northern Africa suggests that Stephen himself came originally from that part of the Roman world. This inference is strongly supported by the marked pecuUarity and style of thought reflected in the speech attributed to him and recorded in Acts 7, for they are found only in writings that show the influence of Alexandria. It is exceedingly probable that in the synagogue of the Cilicians he first met, possibly in open discussion, a certain Jew from the CUician city of Tarsus by the name of Paul. The line of reasoning which Stephen adopted is doubtless represented by the discourse in chapter 7. Starting with Jewish premises, he aimed to show the logical connection with and yet the superiority of the teachings and work of Jesus to those of the earher teachers of his race. Apparently he triumphed over his opponents. He also aroused the bitter oppo sition of many of the HeUenists, so that in their rage they charged him with blasphemy. It was a charge which always stirred the wrath of the Jews. Not only did it enrage the mass of the people but evidently kindled the indignation of the Pharisaic leaders. Thus reinforced, the HeUenistic Jews lodged a definite charge against him before the national Jewish council, the Sanhedrin, before which cases of heresy were tried. The final form of the charge that they preferred against him was that his teachings had been hostile to the Jewish temple and law: "that Jesus the Nazarene will destroy this place and change the customs handed down to us by Moses." Evidently this was a popular inter pretation of the intent of Stephen's teachings. It impUes that he had quoted Jesus' words about the temple recorded in Mark 131- 2. The discourse which follows suggests the ultimate basis of their charge. Like Jesus, Stephen aimed not to destroy the law but to show that his 52 DISCUSSIONS WITH THE JEWS Master's work represented its logical fruition. This charge also sug gests what would have been the conclusion of Stephen's address had not the stones flung by the infuriated mob forever interrupted it. IV. The Logic of Stephen's Speech. The speech attributed to Stephen in Acts 7 is not a formal defense but a resume of his teach ings. Its logical connection is not always obvious and a certain typo logical undercurrent runs through it which is closely related to the contemporary writings emanating from the Alexandrian school. Its free interpretation of history and the use of scripture also recall the methods of the rabbis. He first reminds the Jews of how God called their forefather Abraham and guided their ancestors through countless perils that their descendants might ultimately realize their divine destiny. Each prophet and deUverer was a type of the deliverer that was ultimately to be revealed. The different physical resting-places to which he led his people, and, above all, the land of Canaan, were symboUc of the ultimate rest prepared for those who trust him. The tabernacle and the temple with their formal service were but primitive types of the real heavenly dwelling-place of the Almighty. Through all these various experiences God had been seeking to train his people for the reception of a greater truth, but they had consistently proved stubborn and irreceptive, resisting the influences of his Spirit. Not only they, but the men who stood before him were more intent upon persecuting and killing the prophets than of learning and accepting their messages. Little wonder then that when the Just One announced by all earlier prophets and the culmination of God's process of revela tion came to them they betrayed and murdered him, for they had dis obeyed the law and the divine revelation which it embodied. It is evident that Stephen was not conscious of repudiating the Jew ish law and temple ritual. Rather, like the ethical prophets of old, he felt that he was simply emphasizing their spiritual teachings. Far from desiring to bring about a breach between Judaism and Christian ity, he was, Uke the Twelve, trying to lead the Jews to accept the teachings and work of their greatest prophet and their promised Mes siah. Jesus, in the thought of Stephen, was the Just One toward whom aU their eariier leaders and experiences had pointed. V. The Death of Stephen. In the death of Stephen primitive Christianity lost one of its greatest interpreters. A first-hand impres sion of his character and work is probably preserved in Acts 616b. As he stood before the hostile members of the Sanhedrin, they saw that "his face shone like the face of an angel." It is a dramatic and sig- 53 WORK AND DEATH OF STEPHEN nificant fact that Acts in its account of the martyrdom has brought Paul and Stephen together, and has left us to infer that the divine light that shone from Stephen's dying eyes proved the foregleams of the divine effulgence that beamed upon Paul on his memorable journey a little later to Damascus. Stephen manifested the same tireless energy, the same boldness, and the same utter disregard of opposition and pain as did Paul. Like Paul, his logic was destined in the end to break the narrow bonds of Judaism, though he appears to have been unconscious of that fact. If he had lived, the later history of Pales tinian Christianity would probably have been very different. Cer tainly the break with narrow Judaistic Christianity would have come much earlier. Stephen in his preaching laid the foundations for the world-wide expansion of Christianity. In his work among the Jews of the dispersion resident at Jerusalem he apparently kindled the fire of Christianity which before long flamed up in the far-away cities of northern Africa and western Syria. Fortunately, in a very real sense the mantle which slipped from Stephen's shoulders feU upon Paul. Like Jesus, Stephen in certain ways accompUshed more by his mar tyrdom than he did whfle Uving. Again the age-long principle was illustrated that, if a man gives his life for a cause, no one can gainsay the sincerity of his testimony. The death of Stephen was well cal culated to make an indeUble impression upon all who witnessed or heard of it. The narrative of Acts implies that as he was dying there was given to him one of the many visions of the risen Christ which had characterized and inspired the activity of the early Christians. His words remain the only direct testimony we have regarding the exact nature of these visions: "Behold I see heaven open and the Son of Man standing at God's right hand." §CXLK. THE EXPANSION OF CHRISTIANITY AFTER THE DEATH OF STEPHEN The On the day when Stephen was stoned to death a great ^g persecution broke out against the church in Jerusalem, and ofthe all except the aposties were scattered throughout Judea tians3" and Samaria. And those who were scattered went in dif- sn.^)S ferent directions preaching the gospel. Philip travelled down to the city of Samaria, where he preached Christ to them. And the crowds attended with one accord to what was said by Philip, listening to him and 54 PHILIP'S WORK IN SAMARIA seeing the miracles he performed. For unclean spirits pmip's came with a loud cry out of many who had been possessed, s£rkta and many paralytics and lame people were healed. So ™na there was great joy in that city. Now for some time past a man named Simon had been Simon practising magic arts in the city and astonishing the Sa- mlgi.' maritans, pretending he was a great person. And all sorts «ian and conditions of people attached themselves to him, say ing, This one is that Power of God which is known as 'The Great Power.' They attached themselves to him because he had amazed them for a considerable time with his magic skill. But when they believed Philip, who preached tiie Kingdom of God and the name of Jesus, they had them selves baptized, both men and women. Simon himself also believed, and after being baptized kept close to Philip and was astonished to see the signs and great miracles which were performed. When the apostles at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had His accepted the word of God, they sent to them Peter and John, ^Sum. who came down and prayed that they might receive the ^J"7 Holy Spirit, for it had not yet fallen upon any of them. («-"T They had simply been baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. Then they laid their hands on them and they re ceived the Holy Spirit. But when Simon saw that the Holy Spirit was conferred by the laying on of the apostles' hands, he brought them money, saying, Give me, too, this power, so that anyone on whom I lay my hands may receive the Holy Spirit. Peter said to him, May your money and you perish for supposing that you could buy the gift of God! You have no share nor lot in this religion, for your heart is not right in the sight of God. So repent of this wickedness of yours and pray to the Lord in the hope that your heart's purpose may be forgiven. For I see that you are a bitter poison and a pack of evil. Simon replied, Pray the Lord for me. Pray that nothing you have said may befall me. p'S? So the apostles after bearing their testimony to the word mation of the Lord and preaching it, returned to Jerusalem preach- jesus ing the gospel to a number of the Samaritan villages. But Jp^ the angel of the Lord said to Philip, Rise and go south, gj™^ along the road from Jerusalem to Gaza (this is the desert <£3) 55 THE EXPANSION OF CHRISTIANITY route). So he arose and went on his way. Now there was an Ethiopian eunuch, a high official of Candace the queen of the Ethiopians, who was her chief treasurer and had come to Jerusalem for worship but was on his way home. And as he was sitting in his chariot, he was reading the prophet Isaiah. Then the Spirit said to Philip, Go up and join that chariot. And as PhiUp ran up he heard him reading the prophet Isaiah. Do you understand what you are reading, he asked. How can I, said the eunuch, unless someone guide me? And he begged Philip to get up and sit beside him. Now the passage of scripture which he was reading was this: He was led like a sheep to slaughter, And as a lamb is dumb before tiie shearer, So he opened not his lips. Who will make known his generation. In his humiliation the justice due him was taken away, For his life is cut off from the earth. So the eunuch said to Philip, Pray, of whom is the prophet speaking? Of himself or of someone else? Then Philip opened his mouth, and starting from this scripture preached the gospel of Jesus to him. As they proceeded on their way, they came to some water, and the eunuch said, there is water! What is to prevent me being baptized? So he ordered the chariot to stop, and both of them stepped into the water, and Philip baptized the eunuch. When they came up from the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught Philip away, and the eunuch saw him no longer, for he was proceeding on his way rejoicing. But Philip found himself at Azotus and he passed on, preaching the gospel in every town, until he reached Caesarea. Preach- Now those who had been scattered by the trouble which golpef arose over Stephen made their way as far as Phoenicia and Greeks Cyprus and Antioch, preaching the word to none except Jews. atAn- But some of them were citizens of Cyprus and Cyrene, who on reaching Antioch began preaching to the Greeks also the gospel of the Lord Jesus and considerable numbers were brought in for the Lord. In Antioch also the disciples were first called Christians. 56 tioch (lli» ft, 24, »b) HEROD'S PERSECUTION OF THE APOSTLES Now aoout that time King Herod laid violent hands on Her- some members of the church. James the brother of John °^ he slew with the sword. Seeing that this was pleasing to cution the Jews, he went on to seize Peter during the days of un- apo&-e leavened bread. After arresting him, he put him in prison, *J* handing him over to a guard of sixteen soldiers with the in tention after the passover to bring him out to the people. So Peter was kept in prison under guard; but earnest prayer for him was offered1 to God by the church. Now on the very night when Herod was about to lead peter*» him forth Peter lay asleep between two soldiers, bound by ^S^ two chains, with guards keeping watch before the door. And behold an angel of the Lord stood before him and a light shone in the cell; and striking Peter on the side he woke him and said, Rise quickly! And the fetters fell from his hands. Then the angel said to him, Gird your self and put on your sandals, and he did so. Then said the angel, Throw your cloak about you and follow me. So Peter followed him out not knowing that what the angel was doing was real, but supposing that he saw a vision. When they had passed the first guard and the second, they came to the iron gate leading into the city, which opened to them of its own accord. Then passing out they proceeded through one street, when suddenly the angel left him. Peter, coming to himself, said, Now I know for certain that the Lord hath sent his angel and delivered me from the hand of Herod and from all that the Jewish people were anticipating. When he appreciated this he went to the house of Mary, the mother of John who was surnamed Mark, where a number had assembled and were praying. When he knocked at the door of the porch, a maidservant named Rhoda came to answer it, and as soon as she rec ognized Peter's voice, she did not open the door because of her joy, but ran and told them that Peter was standing in front of the porch. They said to her, You are mad; but she insisted that it was so. It is his angel, they said. But Peter kept on knocking. And when they opened the door they knew that it was he and were amazed. But he beckoned to them with his hand to be silent and described to them how the Lord had brought him out of prison. He 57 THE EXPANSION OF CHRISTIANITY also said, Tell this to James and to the brothers. Then going forth, he went to another place. Now at daybreak there was no little commotion among the soldiers over what could have become of Peter. And when Herod had searched for him and could not find him after cross-questioning the guards, he ordered them away to execution. Her- Then Herod went down from Judea to Caesarea and drath spent some time there. As he was highly incensed against (ub-n) fog inhabitants of Tyre and Sidon, they waited on him unan imously and after having secured the good will of Blastus his chamberlain they begged the king to make pea'ce with them for their country was dependent upon his for its food- supply. So, on an appointed day, Herod, having arrayed himself in royal robes, took his seat on the tribunal and was haranguing them. And the people kept shouting, It is the voice of a god and not of a man. Instantly an angel of the Lord struck him, because he had not given due glory to God, and, being eaten by up worms, he died. I. The Far-Reaching Effects of Stephen's Martyrdom. The death of Stephen inaugurated a new era in the evolution of primitive Christianity. In its background and its influence this period corre sponds in many ways to the Babylonian exile out of which Judaism developed. It represented the beginning of the absolute breach be tween Judaism and Christianity and the birth of the Christian church as an organization independent of the Jewish temple and law. This fact was not suspected by the Palestinian Christians represented by the Twelve, who still clung to the Jewish rites. As a result, they do not appear to have been driven from Jerusalem nor to have been troubled by persecution. From Acts 81, M and Galatians l18 it is evident that, if they left Jerusalem at all, they soon returned to make it their permanent home. Only the Hellenistic Christians, those who had been born in the land of the dispersion and who, like Stephen, interpreted Chris tianity in its larger meaning, were branded as heretics by the Jews and made the object of their bitter persecution. Some were imprisoned (Acts 83), others publicly beaten in the Jewish synagogues (Acts 26u), while others, like Stephen, suffered martyrdom (Acts 2610). This bitter persecution extended even to the cities outside of Jerusalem and appears to have been chiefly instigated by Hellenistic Jews, of whom Paul of Tarsus was one of the most active leaders. 58 EFFECTS OF STEPHEN'S MARTYRDOM The second effect of the martyrdom of Stephen was the extension of the work of the Hellenistic Christian leaders like Philip beyond the narrow bounds of Judaism. Now began that world expansion of Christianity which Luke has dramatically recorded in the book of Acts. Hitherto the followers of Jesus have been content to remain in Jerusalem awaiting his miraculous return, but now the Hellenistic Christians took up anew his preaching mission. Many of them simply returned to their homes in the great commercial centres along the eastern Mediterranean, carrying with them the spirit and teachings of their Master. Thus Christianity, fanned into a flame by persecu tion, spread northward and westward along the great highways, kindling its fires in the chief cities of that ancient world. Each re turning Jewish Christian became a missionary as opportunity offered. Experience soon proved, even as it had in Jerusalem, that the leaven which Jesus placed in the centre of Judaism was even more effective among the peoples Uving beyond the immediate pale of the temple than in Jerusalem itself. The third effect of this first great Christian dispersion was the rapid transformation of the Palestinian type of Christianity when trans planted in new soil. It is difficult to predict what would have become of Stephen and those who accepted his point of view if they had re mained under the shadow of the Jewish temple and under the influ ence of the conservative Palestinian Christian community. But, released from the bonds of Judaism and in close contact with the broadening influences of the Grsecc-Roman world, they developed the type of faith which was destined to overleap all barriers and to inter pret the simple teachings and spirit of Jesus in terms intelligible to all mankind. II. The Samaritan Field. There were many reasons why the Samaritan field was favorable for early Christian missionary activity. Notwithstanding the bitter fraternal hatred with which the Jews re garded the Samaritans, they looked upon them very differently than they did upon the heathen. The Jews despised the Samaritans because their forefathers had freely intermarried with the heathen, because they had shown themselves ready at all times to accept Greek and Roman culture, and because, in accepting simply the Pentateuch as their scriptures, they represented an arrested stage of spiritual, religious, and moral development. And yet even the strictest Pharisee did not object to eating with a Samaritan. Common traditions, institutions, and worship bound the two peoples together. Ea«h shared the hopes 59 THE EXPANSION OF CHRISTIANITY of a coming Messiah. Jesus had set the example to his foUowers of freely associating with the Samaritans and even of preaching and min istering to them. Above all, in one of his great parables he had singled out a Samaritan as a supreme example of neighborUness. The Samar itans were on the whole much more open-minded and tolerant than the Jews. Samaria, therefore, was a field which appealed strongly to a Hellenistic Christian Uke PhiUp. III. The Results of Philip's Preaching in Samaria. Philip's Greek name suggests that he was a Hellenist, as does also his place among the seven appointed to guard the interests of the Hellenistic section of the Jerusalem church. Acts 218 states that his home was in Csesarea, a strong Grseco-Roman city. Apparently his teachings stood midway between those of the native Judaizing Christians and those of the extreme Hellenists. The content of his teaching, as well as the fact that he was a resident of Palestine, strongly point to the conclusion that he had personally seen and heard Jesus. Later Chris tian tradition even confuses him with Philip the disciple. Another tradition makes him one of the Seventy, who, according to Luke's later version of the sending out of the Twelve, were commanded to proclaim the Gospel to the people. This tradition is probably based on the fact that Philip's teachings and method of work closely resemble those adopted by Jesus during his GaUlean ministry. According to the testimony of Acts, PhiUp alone of aU the apostoUc teachers made the Gospel of the Kingdom of God central in his preaching. To this he added "the Gospel of the Name of Jesus" (Acts 8n). In the Ught of the teachings of the earlier apostles, it is evident that this pecuUar phrase refers to the primitive interpretation of the character and mes sianic work of Jesus. With the aid of these meagre records, it is possi ble to reconstruct partially at least the content of Philip's addresses. Evidently his preaching consisted chiefly in a reiteration of the teach ings of Jesus. On his lips may well have been preserved many of the matchless parables of the kingdom which reappear only in Luke's gospel. The scene of his work was apparently the city of Samaria itself, the metropolis and capital of the province which bore that name. Herod the Great had encircled the hill on which this ancient city rested with a great highway, flanked on either side by stately colonnades. The top of the hill he had crowned with a great temple dedicated to Augustus, the foundations of which have only recently been laid bare. Philip had evidently stopped at this centre of Samaritan life on his way back 60 THE RESULTS OF PHILIP'S PREACHING to his home at Csesarea, for the city of Samaria lay on the main high way which led northward and westward from Jerusalem to the sea. The Samaritans throughout their later history showed themselves a simple, childlike people, especiaUy superstitious and susceptible to suggestion. Philip's teaching, like that of Jesus at certain periods of his ministry, was accompanied by acts of healing which appealed power fully to the multitudes. Those who accepted his teachings were bap tized. Thus Philip developed a new and effective type of evangelism which combined the teachings of Jesus and the methods of John the Baptist with a supreme devotion to the Master and the declaration that he was the fulfilment of the messianic hopes which the Samaritans shared in common with their Jewish brothers. The passage in Acts 814"25 seems to imply that the people of Samaria as a whole had been converted and that the apostles Peter and John came as the official representatives of the Jerusalem church to receive these new converts into its membership. The inference that this apostoUc sanction was necessary reflects strongly the point of view and conceptions which first became prevalent during the latter part of the first Christian century. The older record implies that Philip's work was spontaneous, almost accidental, and that the results were themselves sufficient evidence of divine approval. If the apostles came to Samaria attracted by the success of his work, they probably came not in an official capacity but as fellow workers. To the same later churchly tendency is doubtless due the theory that the Holy Spirit came to the Samaritans only as a result of the laying on of the apos tles' hands. The underlying purpose of the story in Acts, however, is to illustrate the significant fact that, although Christianity doubtless often afc- tracted impostors, its innate moral and spiritual character quickly revealed what was spurious. Philip's work among the Samaritans was new evidence of the potency and adaptability of the Gospel of Jesus and of the Gospel about Jesus that was being rapidly formulated by his foUowers. There was nothing in Philip's work to arouse even the most conservative Jewish Christians; and yet the prominence which the narrator gave to PhUip's mission to the Samaritans indicates that it represented an important stage in the expansion of Christianity. It was apparently not in itself permanent and far-reaching largely because of the fickle character of the Samaritans. Possibly it was also because neither PhiUp nor Peter had Paul's organizing and pastoral skill. 61 THE EXPANSION OF CHRISTIANITY IV. Philip's Conversation with the Ethiopian Eunuch. The early apostles inherited from the Hebrew prophets and from Jesus the consciousness of acting at each important crisis in their Uves under direct divine guidance. This conviction is everywhere apparent, not only in Acts but in the writings of Paul. The terms by which this guidance is described vary, as in the present narrative. In Acts 8™ it is stated that an angel of the Lord gave the command to Philip. In 29 it was simply the Spirit, and in 39 the Spirit of the Lord that directed his evangelistic activity. In each case the impulse evidently came from within. The account of PhiUp's memorable conversation with the Ethiopian eunuch implies that the impulse to foUow him came after the evangelist had already returned with the apostles to Jerusalem. The visit of a prominent proselyte, such as the treasurer of Candace, the queen of the Ethiopians, to Jerusalem must have been quickly known to all of its inhabitants. Doubtless as a worshipper he also brought rich gifts to the temple. Ethiopia was the vast, mysterious region to the south of Egypt, whence in the days of Augustus had emerged a queen by the name of Candace who had attempted to drive the Romans out of the Thebiad, but who had been defeated by the Roman general Petronius in 24 B.C. and her capital, Meroe, captured. According to the testimony of Pliny the name Candace was regularly borne by the queens of Ethiopia, and probably corresponded to the Egyptian term Pharaoh. As early as 300 B.C. Greek culture had pene trated Ethiopia, and this fact explains how the Ethiopian eunuch was able to read the Greek version of the Old Testament which Philip found in his hands. It also reveals the influences which led him to make a pilgrimage of fully one thousand miles to the Jewish sanctuary at Jeru salem. The fact that he was reading from Isaiah 537- 8, which describes the suffering of Jehovah's servant, and questioning the meaning of this passage, strongly suggests that while at Jerusalem he had come in contact with the teachings of the apostles and their interpretation of this passage as a direct reference to Jesus. A knowledge of this fact may well have come to Philip and, if so, it constituted one of the chief elements in the impulse which led him to foUow the returning pilgrim. It was a case which must have appealed strongly to Philip's instincts as an evangelist. A late tradition places the spring where the Ethio pian official was baptized on the narrow road, practically impassable for chariots, which leads southwestward from Jerusalem. An older and more probable tradition, however, identifies it with the copious 62 THE ETHIOPIAN EUNUCH spring a little north of Bethzur on the main road southward through Hebron and Gaza. The latter corresponds more perfectly to the desert road definitely mentioned in Acts 8M. In a mind already pre pared Philip sowed the seeds of the Gospel and thereby added to the rapidly growing ranks of the believers one whose influence may go far to explain why before the end of the first Christian century in distant Abyssinia there was a strong and flourishing Christian community. The conversion and baptism of the Ethiopian was not contrary to the narrow traditions accepted by the Palestinian Christians, for, as a proselyte, he had already been accepted within the ranks of Judaism. The incident, however, represents the gradual opening of the door to the Gentiles and was evidently reported for this reason. With the true spirit of the evangelist, Philip, as he set out again for his home at Caesarea, stopped at Azotus on the coast, about twenty miles north of Gaza, and at the other towns on his way and preached the Gospel at every point until he finally carried it to his home city. V. The Spread of Christianity to Antioch. The interest of the author of Acts 21— 1536 in Paul and Peter led him to introduce im mediately after the story of Philip's baptism of the Ethiopian eunuch the accounts of the way in which these two leading apostles were di vinely led to see that God's gracious purpose included Gentiles as weU as Jews. In developing the symmetrical plan of his history, the author recorded the mission of the apostles first to the Jews, then to the Samaritans, then to the Gentiles. Out of deference to Paul and Peter and in keeping with his point of view, it was also natural that he should give Paul and Peter the precedence; although Acts 931 plainly states that the events underlying the account of Peter's vision and baptism of the Roman centurion Cornelius were not immediately after the death of Stephen but during a period of peace, after the church had been extended widely "aU over Judea, Galilee, and Samaria." Fortunately, however, Luke has cited definite evidence of what Paul states in his letter to the Galatians (cf. 28' 9), namely, that the pioneer in proclaiming Jesus to the GentUes was not Peter. It was not even Paul but certain Hellenistic Christians, natives of Cyprus and Cyrene, who at Antioch, soon after the death of Stephen, " told the Greeks also the Gospel of the Lord Jesus." This reading is supported by ex cellent texts and is clearly impUed by the context, although in the accepted version it reads HeUenists (Greek-speaking Jews) instead of Hellenes (Greeks). Probably Luke wrote HeUenists, although his 63 THE EXPANSION OF CHRISTIANITY source read Hellenes. It was this significant step in the extension of Christianity to the whole world which led the author to add in Acts ll22' 23 that, when the news of this preaching of the Gospel to the Gentiles reached the church in Jerusalem "they despatched Barnabas to Antioch. When he came and saw the grace of God he rejoiced and encouraged them all to remain loyal to the Lord with hearty pur pose, for he was a good man, fuU of the Holy Spirit and faith." The narrator has apparently forgotten for the moment that Barnabas was a HeUenist and therefore among those who had fled from Jerusalem after Stephen's martyrdom. The next verse, evidently quoted from an early source, states that "Barnabas went off to Tarsus to look for Saul." Barnabas was the leading spirit in the Antioch church. It is exceedingly probable that this Cypriot was the leader of "the citizens of Cyprus" who first preached the Gospel to the Greeks. Lucius, an other leader at Antioch, was a native of Cyrene (Acts 131). To these generous, noble-hearted Hellenistic Jews, Barnabas and Lucius, be yond reasonable doubt belongs the honor of first breaking the bonds of Judaism and of establishing the important precedents which Paul later made an accepted principle. While Jerusalem was the first home of Christianity, profligate, cos mopolitan Antioch was the birthplace and cradle of Gentile Chris tianity from which it radiated to all the great cities of the Graeco- Roman world. It is significant that here the foUowers of Jesus, who had hitherto called themselves "brothers" or "beUevers" or "the saints" and by the Jews had been known as the "Nazarenes" or "the sect of the Nazarenes," were first called Christians. The presence of Greeks in the ranks of the new sect called for a broader designation. The term is akin to those which the Greeks of Asia coined to designate different parties, so that there is little doubt of its HeUenistic and Antiochian origin. It also indicates that the Christians of Antioch used the Greek language (for Christ is the Greek equivalent of the Hebrew word Messiah) and that the doctrine that Jesus was the promised Messiah was a distinctive element in their teaching. Thus within less than five years after the death of Jesus his teachings had overleaped the narrow bounds of Judaism and Palestine and were the accepted rule of life for a large body of GentUes as well as Jews in the ancient capital city of Antiochus Epiphanes, the arch-persecutor of the Jewish race. From the first the Antioch church appears to have been strong in numbers and leadership and to have almost over shadowed the Jerusalem community. The gifts of the Antioch Chris- 64 CHRISTIANITY AT ANTIOCH tians at the time of the great famine of 46 a.d. stiU further strengthened their position. VI. The Persecution of the Jerusalem Christians by Herod Agrippa I. Luke or an earlier editor has arranged his material in Acts 9-12 not chronologically but according to a definite plan. Thus the account of the famine of 46 a.d. is introducted in ll27-29 before the record in 121"23 of the persecutions instigated by Herod Agrippa, which culminated in the death of James the apostle, probably at the Passover of 44 a.d. The editor's object is to complete his history of the Jerusalem church that he may devote the remainder of his narrative to a detailed account of Paul's missionary work. He also aims to give to the apostle Peter the prominence that he deemed fitting. To this end he intro duces the popular stories in Acts 931-1118, which represent Peter as a pioneer in proclaiming the Gospel to the GentUes, before the record of Paul's first missionary campaign. The first persecution of the Christians was about 32 a.d. and was directed chiefly against the HeUenistic Christians. In the second persecution of 44 the chief victims were the Twelve and especiaUy James, the son of Zebedee, and Peter. The years 41-44 were a bright spot in the otherwise gloomy, tempestuous history of Judaism under the rule of Rome. Among the profligate princes who had been edu cated at the imperial city was a son of Aristobulus, the Ul-fated off spring of the marriage of Herod the Great with Mariamne the Mao cabean princess. Herod Agrippa I was therefore not only a grandson of Herod the Great but also a prince of the Jewish royal line. As a youth at Rome, he had plunged deeply into all forms of vice which that great city presented. At forty he was bankrupt and in extreme disfavor even with the dissolute emperor Tiberius. To escape im prisonment for his debts and for his crimes, he fled to Palestine and through the intercession of his wife was saved from starvation by his relative, Herod Antipas, who appointed him superintendent of mar kets at Tiberias. He soon incurred the suspicion of Antipas and fled to Damascus, where he was caught in the act of accepting graft from its citizens. Thence he returned to Rome, where he was soon thrown into prison by the Emperor Tiberius, but on the accession of Caligula he was made king over the tetrarchy of. PhUip. When Claudius, Agrippa's boon companion, came to the throne in 41, he not only showed special favor to the Jews, giving them full rights as citizens and many privileges, but paid a debt that he owed Agrippa by giving him all the territory in Palestine once held by his grandfather, Herod 65 THE EXPANSION OF CHRISTIANITY the Great. To this concession he added the right of appointing the high priest at Jerusalem. Although a Hellenist and immoral at heart, Herod Agrippa assumed whfle at Jerusalem the r61e of an apostle of strict Pharisaic Judaism. His zeal to figure as the champion of his people led him to attack Christianity and to kiU James the apostle. Peter was also thrown into prison, but he was probably not put to death because of bis well-known regard for Jewish law and institutions. James, the brother of Jesus, who was a stfll more ardent supporter of the Jewish law, was apparently not even imprisoned. The weight of Herod's persecution seems to have faUen simply upon the leaders of the Jerusalem church. Acts 124-19 contains the popular account of Peter's remarkable escape from prison. The form of the story is probably determined by the current Jewish belief that each man had his own guardian angel which interposed in his behalf at critical moments in his Ufe. The detailed character of the narrative leaves Uttle doubt that it rests on historical facts and that Peter was enabled, to the utter surprise of his feUow Christians, to make his escape from Jerusalem on the night preceding the day set for his trial before Herod Agrippa. Possibly the angel of death that smote Herod was the divine agent that Uberated Peter. In any case, the sudden death of Agrippa at Caesarea put an end to the persecution of the Jerusalem Christians by the Jews, for Judea again came under the control of a Roman procurator. Herod paid the penalty for his earlier vices while attending one of the great HeUenic games which he had instituted at his capital and of which he was very fond. VII. Peter's Changed Attitude Toward the Gentiles. The narrative in Acts 12 indicates that Peter fled from Jerusalem and probably took refuge in some city outside the large kingdom which Herod Agrippa then ruled. Antioch with its strong Christian church would be the most natural place of refuge. Unfortunately, the nar rative in Acts leaves many gaps which can be filled in only conjectur- ally. It is probable, however, that when the sudden death of Herod Agrippa put an end for a time to the active persecution of the Jeru salem Christians Peter ventured to return to the borders of Palestine and to take up his abode at Joppa. There he would naturally come into contact with Gentiles and Gentile Christians and was subject to the broadening influences of an important seaport town. There he faced the great Western world even as Paul later did at Troas. It is probable, therefore, that the combined influence of bis recent per- 66 PETER'S ATTITUDE TOWARD THE GENTILES sonal experience, his contact with the Greek Christians at Antioch, and his new appreciation of the needs of the Graeco-Roman world were all effective in preparing the way for the vision recorded in the terms of popular tradition in Acts 10 and 11. Doubtless the problem was presented to him in concrete form in the person of the Roman centurion CorneUus. The narrative in Acts implies that Cornelius, Uke the Ethiopian eunuch, was already a sympathizer with, if not a proselyte to Judaism. It is possible that he had listened to the preach ing of PhiUp the EvangeUst, whose home was at Caesarea, and that Peter with his characteristic zeal and good sense could no longer re sist this appeal, although it was contrary to all his eariier Jewish train ing. In the minds of Luke and of the Palestinian Christians, among whom this tradition grew up, this change in Peter's attitude was evidently regarded as pre-eminently important. In the larger per spective of apostoUc history it was one of the many indubitable proofs of the potency and universaUty of the Gospel of Jesus and of its abil ity, not only to transform the minds and characters of the GentUes, but to broaden those who were rigorously trained under the Jewish law. VIII. The Limitations and Significance of Early Palestinian Christianity. There is much that is discouraging in the develop ment of the Jerusalem church and of the Palestinian Christianity which grew up about it. Most of the members of the Jerusalem church appear to have sunk into poverty and to have been largely dependent for subsistence upon the gifts of the Western churches. In their thinking and Ufe they were stiU largely bound by the fetters of Judaism and shared to a great extent the series of calamities which overtook the Jews of Palestine and culminated, in 70 a.d., in the destruction of the temple. The Jewish persecution had also driven from the capital city the virile leaders in the Christian church, leaving it sadly depleted. One great and inestimable service, however, was performed by the Jewish Christians who still clung to the temple and to places so fuU of rich associations: they collected and faithfully preserved the records of the teachings and deeds of Jesus. Without this service Christianity would have gone forth to its world-task sadly handicapped. If the Jewish Christians of Palestine failed to appreci ate the larger significance of the work and teachings of Jesus, they faithfuUy cherished the words and memories of the great Teacher and in so doing have transmitted to us those vivid portraits of the his torical Jesus without which Christianity would lack a definite, con crete historical foundation. 67 PAUL'S WORK AND TEACHINGS §CL. PAUL'S EARLY TRAINING AND CONVERSION Paul's I am a Jew, born at Tarsus of Cilicia, brought up in this tfonCa" city, educated at the feet of Gamaliel in the strictness of £Acts our ancestral laws, zealous for God. You know the story of my past career in Judaism. You ^aifor 'mow now bitterly I persecuted the church of God and Ms ra£r made havoc of it and how in zeal for my ancestral traditions tradi- I surpassed many of my own age and race. I indeed be- tions (Qal lieved it was my duty to do many things in opposition to !"¦»,' the name of Jesus the Nazarene. This I did in Jerusalem. 26»^) Armed with authority from the high priests, I shut up many of the saints in prison. When they were about to be put to death, I voted against them. In all the synagogues I often punished them and forced them to blaspheme, and in my insane fury I persecuted them even to foreign cities. his vi- I was travelling to Damascus on this business with author- jesus* ity and a commission from the high priest, when at mid- 26^ aay on *ne roao- * saw a uSnt from heaven more dazzling GaK ' than the sun flash around me and those who were trav- ,16'16") elling with me. We all fell to the ground, and I heard a voice saying to me in Hebrew, ' Saul, Saul, why dost thou persecute me? It is painful for thee to kick against the goad.' 'Who art thou?' I asked, and the L6rd said, 'I am Jesus and thou art persecuting me. Now arise and stand on thy feet, for I appeared to thee in order to ap point thee to my service as a witness of what thou hast seen and of the visions thou wilt have of me. I will de liver thee from the Jewish people and also from the Gen tiles, to whom I send thee, that their eyes may be opened and that they may turn from darkness to light, from the power of Satan to God, in order that they may receive the forgiveness of their sins and an inheritance among those 68 PAUL'S VISION OF JESUS sanctified by faith to me.' Thus the God who had set me apart from my birth and called me by his grace chose to reveal his son in me that I might proclaim the good news concerning him to the Gentiles. Forthwith, instead of conferring with any human being His or going up to Jerusalem to see those who had been apos- ^ee ties before me, I went off into Arabia, and I came back years again to Damascus. Then I proceeded to preach first to i«*», those at Damascus. At Damascus the ethnarch of King ^..n Aretas set guards in the city of the Damascenes to arrest f?£~ me, but I was lowered in a basket through the wall and so escaped from his hands. Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to become yisitto acquainted with Cephas (Peter). I remained a fortnight i6mUSa" with him. I saw no other apostle except James the brother Jg^l- of the Lord. I swear to you before God that I am telling the truth in what I write to you. Then I went to the districts of Syria and Cilicia. I was Work personally quite unknown to the Christian churches of s^na Judea; they only heard that ' our former persecutor is now ^cia preaching the faith of which he once made havoc,' which (aM) made them praise God for me. I. Paul's Inheritance. "A man small in size, baldheaded, bandy-legged, weU built, with eyebrows meeting, rather long nose, and with motions full of grace" — such is the traditional description in the late Christian story of Paul and Thecla of the man who, next to Jesus, has done more than any to shape the religious faith of the human race. The famfliar passage in II Corinthians 47 implies that in appearance Paul was weak and insignificant. At Lystra he was wor shipped as Hermes, the smaU, beardless god. The reference in II Corinthians 127 indicates that he was the victim of some chronic disease, which he dramatically describes as "a thorn in the flesh." Galatians 611 suggests that it was an affliction of the eyes: "See with what letters I am writing to you with my own hand." This implication is con firmed by the fact that otherwise Paul apparently always dictated rather than wrote his letters. Furthermore, in referring to his illness in his letter to the Galatian Christians he writes: "I can testify that you would have torn out your very eyes, if you could, and given them to me." From his statement that "my flesh was a trial to you" it 69 PAUL'S EARLY TRAINING would seem that intense sick headaches was one of the accompanying symptoms of his eye trouble. This was probably "the stake in the flesh" to which he elsewhere refers. Thus it would appear that Paul's physical inheritance was insignificant. It was indeed a fragile " earthen vessel" in which his indomitable spirit abode. Paul was probably born about the same time as Jesus. His family belonged to the tribe of Benjamin. He himself bore the Jewish name of Saul, Israel's first great king. His Roman name was Paulus, or Paul. In the book of Acts this is used uniformly and appropriately as soon as the description of his active mission to the Grseco-Roman world begins. He evidently sprang from the weU-to-do working class. His spontaneous interests were with the manual laborers rather than with the rich or learned. His father doubtless taught him his- trade of tent-maker. Weaving the wool of the CiUcian goats and making it into tents was an important industry for the inhabitants of Tarsus. From Acts 2316 we learn that Paul had a married sister and a nephew at Jerusalem. Like Jeremiah, he declares in Galatians l15, 16: "It was the good pleasure of God that separated me from my mother's womb and called me through his grace and revealed his Son in me." The Jewish colony at Tarsus, Uke most of the similar communities in the great cities of the eastern Mediterranean, was a small Jewish world in it self in the midst of the complex Greek and pagan civflization which surrounded it. Here the youthful Saul grew up a strict Jew, famfliar with all the customs of his race and zealous for its institutions. II. Paul's Personality. Paul possessed a versatile, mercurial temperament. He was subject to frequent reactions, but, on the whole, his spirit was that of buoyant optimism. In his reUgious Ufe he was a mystic, given to frequent visions, which to a great extent determined his thought and action; and yet in his teachings and methods of work he was intensely practical. To his versatflity and remarkable adaptability was added the characteristic persistency of his race. Nothing in heaven or earth could deter him from the reaU- zation of his purpose. Over burning deserts and bleak mountain passes, through perils of sea and perils of land he goaded on his weak body until he made it his obedient slave (I Cor. 927). In his letters and in his acts he shows himself not only courageous, strong, and enthusiastic but a hard fighter, whenever he was sure that he had a just case. He was absolutely fearless and outspoken in his denunciation of corruption and wrong-doing of every kind. He was governed by a high sense of personal honor and an intense moral 70 PAUL'S PERSONALITY earnestness. Like the great earlier prophets of his race, he was ready for the sake of the cause which he served to give up everything: fam ily, wealth, reputation, scholarship, ease. He deliberately chose arduous toil, privation, taunts, and danger, and at times active per secution and ultimate death rather than be disloyal to the highest interests of the Master whom he served. Through certain of his more personal letters it is possible to look into the very soul of the man. There we find a playful humor, warm feelings, deep sympathies, and strong friendships. Love is the impelling power. As he declares: "Love it is that constrains me." With these emotional quahties Paul combined a splendid organizing ability. He was unquestionably the greatest statesman of the primitive Christian church. Broad in his grasp of the world situation and master of details as weU as of men, able to execute as weU as to plan — the present generation is beginning to realize that Paul was even greater in his personality and work than in his teachings. III. Paul's Early Environment at Tarsus. Paul shows clearly the influence of the many and varied educational forces with which he came in contact during his diversified career. He ever remained a Hebrew of the Hebrews; but to the powerful racial influences which surrounded the young Jew of Tarsus were added those of the cosmo politan city in which he was born. This great metropolis of fully half a miUion inhabitants was situated on the River Cydnus, ten miles north from the coast, under the shadow of the Taurus mountains, which rise to the north. It commanded the famous southern gateway to Asia Minor which led northward through the Cilician passes. Tarsus was by virtue of its natural situation a great commercial and inteUectual centre, where the ideas and civilization of the East and West met and mingled as in no other Mediterranean city, except possibly in Ephesus. It contained an exceedingly enterprising, cos mopolitan population, in close touch with all the Roman world, ex ceedingly proud, as was Paul, of their Roman citizenship. It was also the seat of a great university, which for generations had been an important centre of Stoic and Cynic philosophy. Strabo's list of the famous philosophers who had either been born or who had studied here is a long one. Chrysippus, the great Stoic, was a native of Tarsus, and the teacher of Cleanthes, whose noble utterance Paul aptly quoted in his famous address at Athens before the court of the Areopagus. The Stoic philosopher Athenadorus, the teacher and friend of Augustus, had been appointed by his royal patron ruler of his native city, Tarsus. 71 PAUL'S EARLY TRAINING The principles which guided him in his effective rule are quoted by Seneca (Concerning the Peaceful Mind, III): "So it is requisite for us in order to prepare our minds for the managing of the civic affairs, to be always active. For if one is determined to make himself useful to his fellow citizens, yea, and to all men, one accomplishes two things at once. He who places himself at the centre of affairs and admin isters them according to his faculties benefits both the public interests and his own affairs." Nestor, also a weU-known phflosopher, suc ceeded Athenadorus and was probably at the head of the govern ment at Tarsus during Paul's boyhood. The University of Tarsus was chiefly attended by natives of that city. This seat of learning apparently exerted a powerful influence not only upon the govern ment but upon the life and thought of all the citizens. They were famous for their abiUty to speak on practicaUy any subject without previous preparation. Strabo declares: "Even the natives do not remain but travel abroad to complete their studies, and having com pleted them reside in foreign countries" (XTV, 513- "). Tarsus to a unique degree produced citizens of the world and sent forth many itinerant preachers of the Stoic and Cynic philosophies. These facts shed a new light on Paul's declaration: "I am debtor both to the Greeks and to the barbarians, both to the wise and to the foolish" (Rom. I14). It is clear, however, that although he was indirectly and inevitably influenced by the inteUectual and cultural environ ment in which he spent his early youth, the attitude of the young Jew of Tarsus toward Greek learning was, on the whole, one of dis trust, if not contempt. The Judaism of the dispersion was always self- sufficient. Though a part of the Graeco-Roman world, the Jews stood apart. Hence, the most powerful influences in Paul's early youth were unquestionably those of his Jewish home. As at Jesus' home at Nazareth, the traditions and laws of his race were closely interwoven with the every-day life of the family. Among the earUest words which fell upon his childish ears were those which voiced Israel's confession of faith: "Hear, O Israel, for the Lord our God is one Lord." Every waking hour was filled with reminders of his people's remark able past and of the presence of the supreme Ruler and Father whom they revered. His studies in the local synagogue school, to which he probably went at about the age of seven, further intensified the strong religious influence of his home. Here he was probably taught He brew and Aramaic, although most of his quotations from the Old Testament come from the Greek version, which was by this time in 72 PAUL'S ENVIRONMENT AT TARSUS common use among the Jews of the dispersion. His words in Galatians l15 strongly suggest that, although he was taught the trade of tent- making, from his earliest childhood he was consecrated by his parents to the rabbinate. This conclusion is confirmed by his appearance in Jerusalem a Uttle later. Thus from his boyhood years the conscious ness of a definite calling gave an especial interest and objective to all his studies. It doubtless also exerted a powerful influence on his daily life so that he was able to declare that as regards the righteous ness which was in the law he was blameless (Phil. 36"7). IV. Paul's Training at Jerusalem. Probably at about the age of fifteen Paul went to Jerusalem to complete his preparation as a rabbi. In the Jewish world Jerusalem was the great central uni versity, the home of advanced reUgious study. It was tOi Judaism what Athens had long been to the Grseco-Roman world.* The breadth of Paul's home training is indicated by the fact that he went to sit at the feet of Gamaliel, the most progressive and prominent Jewish teacher of his age. This famous rabbi is said to have been the grandson of Hfllel. He was then the head of the liberal school which that great teacher had founded. He it was who said: "Appoint for yourself a teacher; thus you wfll avoid what is doubtful." He was one of the very few Jewish teachers who dared depart from the traditions of his race and make use of Greek Uterature. In Paul's earlier years the master was probably much broader and more tolerant than his dis ciple, but his example later bore rich fruit in the memorable address on the Areopagus. In the schools of Jerusalem Paul was instructed not only in the current interpretations of the scriptures of his race but also in the pecuUar rabbinical methods which he frequently used in his later discourses and letters. These methods were intuitive rather than logical; often fanciful rather than inductive. Real or imaginary analogies were employed more often than strictly scientific processes of reasoning. Allegorical interpretations were freely adopted, even though they had no support in the original. Paul's tendency to employ these methods explains many of the most troublesome passages in his epistles, for notwithstanding his complete conversion to the principles of Christianity, he ever remained in his methods of thought an oriental Jew. V. Paul's Zeal as a Persecutor. It was not only the teaching which he received in Jerusalem but its atmosphere which powerfully affected Paul. There he became a Pharisee of the Pharisees (cf. Phil. 36 for his own testimony). In him the intense devotion, the 73 PAUL'S EARLY TRAINING aspiration, the zeal, and the intolerance of his race was sublimated. His was also in part the zeal and intolerance of youth. These were strengthened by his own natural characteristics. He never did any thing half-way. The result was that, according to his own testimony, Paul, the youthful candidate for the rabbinate, became the ardent persecutor of the Galilean sect which had suddenly taken root not only in Jerusalem but also in certain other Syrian cities. In him the Sadducean high priests, Ananus and Caiaphas, ever suspicious of this sect with its messianic leanings, found a valuable agent. They ap pear to have given him an open commission to accuse of blasphemy — a capital offense in the Jewish law — any whom he might suspect. Unfortunately, Paul gives no details concerning the inner develop ment which resulted thus tragically. The account of Stephen's work and martyrdom imphes that he first came into contact with the fol lowers of Jesus in the open discussions led by Stephen in the synagogues of the Hellenistic Jews in Jerusalem. As has been already noted, the report of Stephen's speech in Acts 7 suggests the nature of these dis cussions. The rabbinical methods employed in interpreting the Old Testament scriptures were accepted as vaUd by Paul as well as by Stephen. The great question at issue, the character, work, and ap pearance of the promised Messiah, was of the keenest interest to every member of the Pharisaic party. About it were focused their most cherished political and social and religious hopes. In the light of our later knowledge of Paul, it requires little imagination to picture the fiery zeal with which he entered into these discussions. The claim of Stephen and of the other foUowers of Jesus that he was indeed the Messiah seemed not only preposterous but blasphemous. There is no clear evidence that Paul had ever seen Jesus in the flesh. The references in his letters are evidently to his spiritual vision. He had doubtless often heard about Jesus and his work from the Pharisees who had dogged the footsteps of the Galilean Teacher; and their re ports would be far from favorable. It was the very leaven of the Pharisees, against which Jesus had so earnestly warned his disciples, that filled the mind of Paul. Jesus' critical attitude toward much of the Mosaic law and especially toward the traditions of the fathers was enough in itself to condemn him in the eyes of an enthusiastic young Pharisee. Instinctive antagonism explains why Paul, even if he had the opportunity to see and hear Jesus, probably never im proved it. So to one like Paul, familiar with the Deuteronomic law, which declared that "he who is hanged is accused of God" (Deut. 74 PAUL'S ZEAL AS A PERSECUTOR 2123) Jesus' ignominious death was in itself absolute proof of the flagrant impiety as well as folly of those who claimed that he was the Messiah. That this very passage was earlier one of Paul's chief stumbling- blocks is indicated by the way in which he refers to it in his letter to the Galatians (313, "). To their seeming impiety the followers of Jesus added the still more blasphemous claim that he yet lived and had been exalted to the right hand of God, and they adduced as proof the as tonishing statement that since his crucifixion he had repeatedly ap peared to them. The old law of Deuteronomy seemed to point the way of duty very clearly to Paul: "If thy brother, the son of thy mother, or thy son, or thy daughter or the wife of thy bosom, or thy friend, who is as thy own Ufe, teach heresy, thou shalt not listen to him nor pity him, but thou shalt surely kiU him; thy hand shall be first upon him to put him to death and afterward the hand of aU the people. And thou shalt stone him to death with stones." To one who was taught to beUeve, as were the disciples of the rabbis, that "he who asserts that the law is not from Heaven has no part in the future world," the command of God seemed clear though its execution was repugnant to all the best impulses implanted in the heart of man. Some such process of thought alone explains why the naturally kind- hearted, impulsive, conscientious Jew of Tarsus became an arch-per secutor of the humble foUowers of Jesus. Possibly the bitter heat engendered by the discussions in the synagogue of the Cilicians also explains why Paul first consented to the stoning of Stephen, the leader of the opposition, and then, having thus committed himself to an extreme position, threw himself into the persecution with his char acteristic vehemence. VT. The Four Accounts of Paul's Conversion. It is significant that the New Testament contains four variant accounts of what was in its far-reaching consequences the most important event in the history of the early Christian church. The author of Acts has preserved three of them, although no one agrees with another in all details. Here the analogies are close with the stories which gather about the important events of Old Testament history, as, for example, Moses' prophetic call or the exodus from Egypt. The oldest account is the briefest and comes directly from Paul: "God, who set me apart from my birth and caUed me by his grace, chose to reveal his Son in me that I might proclaim the good news concerning him to the Gentiles" (Gal. I15, M). To this he adds in connection with his account of the res urrection visions of Jesus in I Corinthians (151-8) : "And Tast of aU, as to 75 PAUL'S CONVERSION a child untimely born, he appeared to me also." Paul's words leave no doubt that his conversion was a real spiritual experience, as is evinced by his changed activity and attitude. The account in Acts 26 is evi dently the oldest of the three traditions presented by Luke. It agrees substantially with Paul's own testimony, but it makes the revelation more objective. The time and place are indicated and, as in the ac count of the caU of Isaiah or Jeremiah, the divine revelation takes the form of a dialogue. The entirely new element is the statement that a marveUous flashing light was seen not only by Paul but also by his companions. The second account in Acts 22 agrees substantially with that in Acts 26, except that it states that, while Paul's companions saw the light, they did not hear the voice that spoke to him. It also adds that Paul was divinely commanded to go to Damascus, where he would be told what he was destined to do and that this promise was fulfilled through the instrumentality of a certam Ananias, who bap tized him and in the presence of whom he regained his lost sight. It also states that he returned to Jerusalem, where he had another divine vision and a renewal of his commission to go to the Gentiles. The third account in Acts 9 is evidently in part a composite of the two accounts in 22 and 26. It differs, however, in stating that Paul's companions heard the divine voice but "saw no one. It adds that a special vision was vouchsafed Ananias very similar to that attributed to Peter in Acts 10. It also states that after conducting an active mission in Damascus he went up to Jerusalem and entered into open discussions with the HeUenistic Jews. Paul's own testimony, however, is that he remained but fifteen days in Jerusalem and saw no apostle except Peter and James, the brother of Jesus. The minor variations in these versions indicate clearly that in the later tradition imagination has furnished many details. The tendency in each succeeding genera tion was to interpret Paul's inner vision more objectively and super- naturally. VII. Paul's Transforming Psychological Experience. Paul and the early Christian historians inevitably described his conversion in terms of the first-century psychology and belief. Greek and Roman, as wefl as Jew, then firmly believed that the spirit of the departed could become visible to the human eye and exert a powerful influence in the affairs of men (cf. Morley, Greek and Roman Ghost Stories). They also beUeved that the gods could enter in and dwell in men and direct their thoughts and words and acts. Thus they interpreted the acts of the priestess at the Delphic oracle and the ecstatic deeds 76 PAUL'S TRANSFORMING EXPERIENCE and utterances of the devotees of the various mystery religions. This idea was already an estabUshed tenet in Judaism, as well as in other oriental religions. While these beliefs naturaUy determine the form in which Paul describes his experience, they do not conceal the ulti mate reality. The task of the modern age is to interpret it into the terms of present-day psychology. In his epistles, and especially Romans, Paul throws much Ught upon the inner struggle that pre ceded his conversion. In the first eight chapters of Romans he tells of the bitter dissatisfaction which came to him when he discovered that even the law which he so ardently championed could not free him from sin. In the face of the dying Stephen he saw reflected the peace and joy which he himself passionately coveted. The fierce zeal with which he persecuted the Christians suggests the acts of a fanatic, dimly con scious of the weakness of his position. Like a refractory ox, he was kicking against the goad. Not being an ox but an inteUigent being, the knowledge of how unreasonable was his action only added to his fury. Moreover, Paul was not governed primarily by his intellect but by his intuition and emotions. The devotion and forbearance of Stephen and of other Christian martyrs, who foUowed his heroic ex ample, undoubtedly appealed powerfully and in the end irresistibly to the naturaUy tender heart of Paul. Here was something that Phar isaism lacked. Could it be that the teacher, in loyalty to whom his foUowers serenely faced death, was indeed the promised Saviour of the race? Was the way of the cross, after aU, the way of salvation? If, as his disciples claimed, Jesus stfll lived, then he had indeed broken the power of the ancient curse upon any one that hangs upon a tree and had the unmistakable approval of God himself. Such thoughts must have been in the mind of Paul when the great transformation came to him. Later tradition is probably right in stating that this came suddenly. This rapid transformation was in perfect keeping with Paul's temperament and character. It is closely analogous to the epoch-making moments in the life of the ancient prophets like Isaiah and Jeremiah. It came as a sudden, marvellous vision of the crucified and risen Lord. What the disciples had seen, Paul now be held. Possibly in keeping with the psychology of his day, he himself believed that he saw and heard a visible, objective personality. Cer tainly those to whom he related his experience soon believed that he had. But the essential fact in Paul's experience was, as he declares, that God "had revealed his son in him." Henceforth the Spirit of Jesus became the abiding, guiding force in Paul's Ufe. All of his sub- 77 PAUL'S EARLY TRAINING sequent career bears testimony to the reality of this fact. He clearly had in mind his own transforming experience when he declared: "We all with unveiled face, reflecting as a mirror the glory of the Lord, are transformed into the same likeness as himself from glory to glory." To a man with Paul's earnest, devoted spirit, such a revelation was an imperative, divine caU to service, "for God who said, 'Let light shine out of darkness,' has shone within my heart to illuminate men with the knowledge of God's glory in the face of Christ." Paul also saw further than Jesus' disciples, for he recognized that through him the old law was set aside and a new way of finding God and the richness of Ufe was provided for Gentile as well as Jew. Paul's personal in terests, as well as the divine will, impelled him to proclaim that Gospel to the great world that lay outside of Palestine which he knew so well and which, like himself, was craving and seeking for that feUow ship with the eternal Father, that sense of brotherhood with the human race, and that ideal of service which Jesus had not only taught but realized. VIII. Paul's First Fifteen Years of Missionary Activity. The narrative of Acts is almost silent regarding the fifteen years immedi ately following Paul's conversion. The chief interest of the writers which Luke quotes regarding this period is in the Jerusalem church and the authority of the apostles. Luke does cite certain traditions which represent Paul as working at Jerusalem in conjunction with the apostles, but this is belied by Paul's own testimony. The one point in which Luke's evidence is supported by that of Paul is that he labored during the latter part of this period in his native province of CiUcia. Meagre though his aUusions are, Paul is practically our only informant regarding these early years. From the references in his epistles it is possible to develop at least the order of events with reasonable as surance. Paul's conversion must have taken place before 36 a.d., when Caiaphas was deposed. The year 33, three or four years after the death of Jesus, is a most probable date. Three years he appears to have worked in the neighborhood of Damascus before his expulsion by the ethnarch of the Arabian king Aretas IV. The exact way in which this was accomplished and the extent of the power of Aretas are not known. Paul's hasty, secret visit to Peter at Jerusalem evidently followed closely after his escape from Damascus. The next important conference with Peter fourteen years later (Gal. 21) would therefore be about 47 a.d., immediately before his first missionary campaign. This conclusion in perfect harmony with the data in Acts, which in- 78 PAUL'S FIRST FIFTEEN YEARS OF ACTIVITY dicates that 46 was the year spent by Paul at Antioch before he set out on that campaign. The period of retirement in Arabia was clearly a period of recon struction, spent not with men or apostles, but alone with God. Then Paul adjusted himself to his new vision of Jesus and to his new task. Immediately after this he began his missionary work in Damascus, preaching undoubtedly to Gentiles as well as Jews. That he did so and that his work met with some success alone explain the attempt of the ethnarch of the Arabian king to arrest him. The two weeks spent quietly at Jerusalem with Peter and James, the brother of Jesus, gave to an alert, devoted disciple like Paul a marveUous opportunity to become intimately acquainted with the facts regarding the life and especially with the teachings of Jesus. It, as well as later inter views, furnishes the explanation of that consciousness of speaking on the basis of Jesus' direct authority which is evident throughout Paul's letters. The next twelve years were devoted to missionary work in Syria and Cilicia. GraduaUy Paul worked back to his native city Tarsus. These years appear to have been rich in experience. In II Cormthians (ll23"27) he has given a word-picture of the trials and deeds of heroism which belong chiefly to these years: "I have often been at the point of death. Five times I have received forty lashes (all but one) from the Jews, three times have I been beaten; once I was stoned, three times shipwrecked; I have been adrift on the sea a night and a day, in many journeys, in perils from rivers, in perils from robbers, in perils from Jews and Gentiles, in peril of town and desert, in perils on the sea, in perils among false brothers, through labor and hardships, through many a sleepless night, through hunger and thirst, often starving, cold and ill-clad." It was in this school of strenuous, heroic service that the world's greatest missionary was trained. During these arduous years Paul does not seem to have met with large success. Nowhere in his letters does he refer to the results of this work. At least it was not sufficient to arouse the alarm of the conservative Jewish Christians at Jerusalem. Only to their ears had come the vague, though cheering report that "our former persecutor is now preaching the faith of which he once made havoc." This early work was sig nificant because it was an earnest of greater things. Like his Master, Paul found joy in the midst of pain and persecution. In II Cormthians (121-4) he teUs of one of the glorious visions that illumined his arduous way. He dates it about 40 A.D., when he was in the midst of his work 79 PAUL'S EARLY TRAINING in Syria and CiUcia. He declares that he was caught up into the third heaven. He frankly confesses that he does not know whether it was in the body or not that he was thus transported up to paradise, but he does know that he heard sacred secrets which no human lips can repeat. That this experience was to him of profound spiritual im port is clear from the way in which he refers to it and from its effect upon him and upon his life-work. In the same connection he speaks of his superabundance of visions, indicating that these experiences were frequent. They reveal the mystical side of Paul's nature, that capacity for personal fellowship with God which was the perennial source of his power. The vivid consciousness of God working in and through him was the irresistible force that drove him on through seemingly insuperable obstacles and perils. Even though its mani festations reflect the unscientific psychological ideas of the age, it was supremely vital and real to Paul and through him to the human race, for it meant personal redemption, liberty and life. § CLI. PAUL'S FIRST MISSIONARY CAMPAIGN Paul at Now Barnabas went off to Tarsus to try to find Saul. tfoch And when he found him, he brought him to Antioch, where {$£% for a whole year they were connected with the church there and taught a large number of people. contri- During these days certain prophets came down from to tC Jerusalem to Antioch. One of whom, named Agabus, famish- showed by the Spirit that a great famine was about to come cinis- throughout the whole world (the famine which came in judf™ the reign of Claudius). So the disciples, each as he was (i12I»)'M' able' decided t0 send relief to the brothers living in Judea. This they did, sending their contributions to the elders by Barnabas and Saul. After Barnabas and Saul had per formed their mission, they returned from Jerusalem bring ing with them John, surnamed Mark. com- In the church at Antioch there were prophets and teachers, ^ |a° Barnabas, Symeon (called Niger) and Lucius the Cyrenian, SSS" Resides Manaen (a playmate of Herod the tetrarch) and saui as Saul. As they were worshipping the Lord and fasting, the aon- Holy Spirit said, Set me apart Barnabas and Saul for the ¦j**^ work to which I have called them. Then after fasting and praying and laying their hands on them they let them go.» 80 WORK OF BARNABAS AND PAUL IN CYPRUS So they, being thus sent by the Holy Spirit, went down Their to Seleucia and from there they sailed to Cyprus. On ¦n'cy- reaching Salamis they proclaimed the word of God in the p™* Jewish synagogues, and they had John [Mark] as their assistant. And when they had gone through the whole is land as far as Paphos, they met with a Jewish sorcerer and false prophet called Bar- Jesus; he was with the proconsul Sergius Paulus, an intelligent man, who called for Barnabas and Saul and asked to hear the word of God. But Elymas the sorcerer (for that is the translation of his name) tried to divert the proconsul from the faith. So Saul (who is also called Paul), filled with the Holy Spirit, looked in tently at him and said, You son of the devil, you enemy of all that is right, full of craftiness and cunning, will you never stop diverting the straight paths of the Lord ? See, even now the Lord's hand will fall on you, and you will be blind, unable for a time to see the sun. Instantly a mist and a darkness fell upon him, and he groped about for someone to take him by the hand. Then the pro consul, when he saw what had happened believed, being astounded at the teaching of the Lord. Setting sail from Paphos, Paul and his companions came Jour- to Perga in Pamphylia. John left them and went back to 5^*° Jerusalem, but they, passing on from Perga, arrived at ^*} Pisidian Antioch. On the sabbath they went into the synagogue and sat Paul's down; and, after the reading of the law and the prophets, totiS8 the rulers of the synagogue sent word to them, Brothers, JJ^ot if you have any word of encouragement for the people, say tioch it. So Paul stood up and, motioning with his hand, said, <,'b"'1) Listen, men of Israel and you who revere God. The God of this people Israel chose our fathers; he made the people great during their stay in the land of Egypt and with uplifted arm led them out of it. For about forty years he fed them as a nursing mother in the desert, and after destroying seven nations in the land of Canaan, he gave them their land as an inheritance for about four hundred and fifty years. After that he gave them judges down to the time of tiie prophet Samuel. Then it was that they asked for a king, and God gave them for forty years Saul, the son of 81 PAUL'S FIRST MISSIONARY CAMPAIGN Kish, who belonged to the tribe of Benjamin. After de posing him, he raised up David to be their king, to whom he bore this testimony: ' In David the son of Jesse I have found a man after my own heart, who will obey all my will.' From his offspring God brought to Israel, as he had promised, a Saviour, even Jesus, before whose coming John had aheady preached a baptism of repentance for all the people of Israel. And as John was closing his career he often said, What do you consider that I am? I am not he. But there is one coming after me. I am not worthy to unloose the sandals on his feet! Brothers, sons of Abraham's race and all among you who revere God, the message of this salvation has been sent to us. The in habitants of Jerusalem and their rulers, by condemning him in their ignorance, fulfilled the words of the prophets which are read every sabbath. Though they could find him guilty of no crime that deserved death, they asked Pilate to have him put to death. After they had carried out all that had been written of him, they took him down from the cross and laid him in a tomb. But God raised him from the dead. For many days he was seen by those who had come up with him from Galilee to Jerusalem; they are now his witnesses to the people. And we preach to you the glad news that God hath fulfilled the promise made to our forefathers by raising up Jesus. As it is written in the second psalm: Thou art my son, To-day have I become thy father. And as a proof that he has raised him from the dead, never to return to corruption, he hath said, I will give you holy and trustworthy promises made to David; in another psalm he saith : For thou wilt not let thy Holy One see corruption. Of course David, after serving his own generation in accord with God's purpose, died and was laid beside his fathers; he saw corruption, but he whom God raised did 82 PAUL'S ADDRESS AT ANTIOCH not see corruption. Therefore you must understand, my brothers, that forgiveness of sins is proclaimed to you through him, and that by him everyone who believes is absolved from all that the law of Moses could not absolve you. Beware then lest the prophetic saying applies to you: Behold, ye who are disdainful, be astonished and perish, For in your days I am carrying out a work — A work which you will never believe, though one were to explain it to you. As Paul and Barnabas were going out, the people begged itsim- to have all this repeated to them on the following sabbath, ^f1' And when the synagogue broke up, a number of the Jews effect and the devout proselytes followed Paul and Barnabas who ^ talked to them and urged them to hold fast to the grace of God. And on the next sabbath nearly all the city gathered to oppo- hear the word of the Lord. But when the Jews saw the ff°^e crowds, they were filled with jealousy; they began to con- Jews tradict what Paul said and to abuse him. So Paul and procia^ Barnabas spoke out boldly. The word of God, they said, ^^ had to be spoken to you first; but since you spurn it and g°®gel judge yourselves unworthy of eternal life, well, here we Gen-e turn to the Gentiles. For this is the Lord's command to *«*!) us: I have set you to be a light for the Gentiles, To bring salvation to the end of the earth. When the Gentiles heard this they rejoiced and glorified the word of the Lord and beUeved, that is, all who had been ordained to eternal life; and the word of the Lord was spread abroad throughout the whole country. But the Jews incited the devout women of high rank and the lead ing men in the town, who stirred up persecution against Paul and Barnabas and drove them out of their territory. But they shook the dust off their feet as a protest against them and went to Iconium. The disciples, however, were filled with joy and the Holy Spirit. 83 PAUL'S FIRST MISSIONARY CAMPAIGN Perse- At Iconium the same thing happened. They went into £t ie?. the synagogue of the Jews and spoke in such a way that a n™> &eat numt>er both of Jews and Greeks believed. But the refractory Jews stirred up and exasperated the feeling of the Gentiles against the brothers. Yet they spent a con siderable time, speaking boldly about the Lord, who at tested the word of his grace by allowing signs and wonders to be performed by them. The populace of the town, however, was divided; some sided with the Jews, some with the aposties. But, when there was a hostile movement of Gentiles and Jews along with their rulers to insult and stone them, the apostles escaped to the Lycaonian towns of Lystra and Derbe and the surrounding country; there they con tinued to preach the gospel. The At Lystra there was a man sitting, who was powerless in of the bis *eet> a lame man unable to walk from birth. He heard curing paul speaking, and Paul, gazing intently at him and recog- famee nizing that he had faith enough to make him well, said in ^^ a loud voice, Stand upright on your feet. So he sprang up Lystra and began to walk. Now when the crowds saw what Paul had done, they shouted in the Lycaonian language, The gods have come down to us in human form ! Barnabas they called Zeus, and Paul Hermes, since he was the chief speaker. Indeed the priest of the temple of Zeus in front of the town brought oxen and garlands to the gates, in tending to offer sacrifice along with the crowds. But when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard this they tore theh clothes and rushed out into the crowd, shouting, Men, what is this you are doing? We are but men, with natures like your own! The gospel we are preaching to you is to turn you from these unreal things to the living God who made the heaven, the earth, the sea, and all that in them is. In past ages he allowed all nations to go theh own ways, though as the bountiful giver he did not leave himself without a witness, giving you rain from heaven and fruit ful seasons, giving you food and joy to your heart's con tent. Even by words like these they could scarcely keep rpjjg the crowds from sacrificing to them. stoning But Jews from Antioch and Iconium arrived, who won (i..m) over the crowds and stoned Paul and dragged him out of 84 Ga- THE STONING OF PAUL the city, thinking he was dead. But, as the disciples gath ered round him, he arose and went into the city. Next day he went off with Barnabas to Derbe; and after Revis- preaching the gospel to that city and making a number of }JJ£G. disciples, they turned back to Lystra, Iconium and Antioch, latLn strengthening the disciples, encouraging them to hold by e^urch the faith, and telling them, We must enter the Kingdom (""B> of God through many afflictions. They ordained elders for them in every church, and with prayer and fasting commended them to the Lord in whom they had beUeved. Then, passing through Pisidia they came to PamphyUa; and after speaking the word of the Lord in Perga they went down to Attatia. Thence they sailed for Antioch, where they had been commended to the grace of God for the work they had now completed. On theh arrival they gathered the church together and The proceeded to report how God had worked with them, and £*<£* how he had opened a door of faith for the Gentiles. They church spent a considerable time there with the disciples. tfoch1" (28-28) I. Paul's Work at Antioch. Antioch, the old Syrian capital, was not only the city where the term "Christians" was coined, but also the point from which Christianity set out on its deliberate con quest of the Roman world. Here it was that the Gospel of Jesus had first been proclaimed to the Gentiles. As a result, many Greeks were already found in the membership of the Antioch church. An tioch was also the Syrian gateway through which ran the main high way that led across Asia Minor and Macedonia to Rome. Its natural position, as well as its history, fitted it for its lofty role. The wisdom and foresight of the Antioch Christians and especially of Barnabas, their leader, were revealed by taking Paul into their ranks. It was a most significant recognition of the man and his work in Tarsus and Cflicia. Barnabas even went in person to bring Paul to Antioch, thus giving to the act an official authority. For Paul the year spent in teaching at Antioch must also have been of great value. Here amidst most favorable conditions he faced many of the problems that he later met single-handed in the other great cities of the empire. Here he worked side by side with Barnabas, whose earlier years as a follower of Jesus had been spent at Jerusalem in closest contact with the Twelve. Here Paul must have absorbed many of the beliefs 85 PAUL'S FIRST MISSIONARY CAMPAIGN and hopes of the primitive Jerusalem church, although, as he repeatedly asserts, his own faith rested on more personal grounds — his experience of the risen Christ and of the divine Spirit working in his life and in that of the converts who responded to his preaching. The date of Paul's work at Antioch is indicated by Luke, for he connects it with the terrible drought and famine that came according to Josephus during the procuratorship of Tiberius Alexander, 46-48 a.d. Jerusalem suffered especiaUy. The needs of its inhabitants were in part relieved through the generous gifts of a Jewish proselyte, Queen Helena, of Adiabene. Her example was foUowed by the Chris tians of Antioch. Barnabas and Paul, the leaders in the mission to the Gentiles, were chosen to bear these evidences of the good-will and devotion of the Gentile Christians to the members of the Judean churches. This Christian act undoubtedly did much to heal the threatening breach between these two branches of the church. It also opened the way for the memorable interview between Paul and the authorities at Jerusalem, recorded in Galatians 2 (cf. § CLII), which established the freedom of the Gentile Christians. It is also sig nificant that the one condition then insisted upon by the Jerusalem authorities was that the benefactions of the Gentile Christians be con tinued. Another important result of the mission to Jerusalem was that Paul and Barnabas brought back with them to Antioch Barnabas's nephew, John Mark, who, according to early Christian tradition, had been closely associated with Peter and who later wrote the earliest surviving life of Jesus. Thus the two very different types of churches, that at Jerusalem and that at Antioch, were closely bound together by the bond of mutual service and the way prepared for the great for ward step that came on the return of Paul and Barnabas to Antioch. II. The Sending Forth of Barnabas and Paul. The narrative in Acts implies that the impulse to enter upon the first foreign mis sionary campaign came not from one man but from the collective body of Antioch Christians. Paul by his teachings and example had undoubtedly sown the seed. It requires little imagination to detect his personal influence in the memorable meeting when the great de cision was made. Those who suggest are usually chosen to execute, and Barnabas and Paul were the two appointed to initiate the work. The success of the Jerusalem mission may also have led the Antioch Christians to seek a larger field. They probably had large resources at their command. Barnabas formerly held land in Jerusalem; Manaen, one of their number, had been a playmate of Herod, the 86 SENDING FORTH BARNABAS AND PAUL tetrarch. Antioch was an opulent city and the Jews were among its most prosperous citizens. It is probable, therefore, that Barnabas and Paul went forth on their foreign mission supported not only by the prayers and benedictions but also by the gifts of the Antioch Christians, for "freely you have received, freely give" was a funda mental tenet of their faith. The missionary spirit was not a later growth but a fundamental principle of primitive Christianity. III. The Work of Barnabas and Paul in Cyprus. It is sig nificant that when they went forth Barnabas was the leader; when they returned Paul, the younger, was the commanding spirit. Bar nabas first led Paul and Mark to his native island of Cyprus, but before the two leading apostles returned they had carried the Gospel of Jesus many miles beyond Paul's native city, Tarsus. The author of this section of Acts deliberately condenses his account of the mis sionary campaign in Cyprus. His reason is in keeping with his pur pose, which was to describe the victorious advance of Christianity from Jerusalem to Rome and to show that it was protected rather than op posed by the Roman authorities. Cyprus, as weU as Egypt, was aside from the main Une of that advance. At Salamis, the chief eastern port of Cyprus, the Christian missionaries found a large Jew ish colony and were doubtless freely admitted to the synagogues, for it is probable that in this distant outpost little opposition between Judaism and Christianity had as yet developed. Luke's narrative does not expand until Barnabas and Paul come into contact with the Roman proconsul who ruled the island from its capital, Paphos. This was the new Paphos on the coast ten miles northeast of the ancient city of Paphos which had long been famous for worship of the Paphian goddess, whose shrine was there. The Roman proconsul, Paulus, was evidently a man of culture, interested in the various current philosophies. Pliny mentions him among the Roman writers of the day. In his train was a Jew who had grafted on to his inherited faith many of the heathen ideas and practices that had come from the East, especiaUy from Persia. This haff philosopher and half fakir had also won a reputation as a prophet or pubUc preacher. He was one of the many missionaries in that strongly missionary age. The mother goddess of Phrygia, the Egyptian goddess Isis, as well as the Cynic and Stoic philosophies, all had their emissaries, like the Pharisees "encompassing sea and land to make proselytes." In Asia Minor, Macedonia, and Rome Paul met and contested with them for the faith of men. In the presence of the cultured Roman proconsul it is 87 PAUL'S FIRST MISSIONARY CAMPAIGN not Barnabas nor Saul the Jew, but Paulus the Roman citizen who suddenly stands forth and from this time on holds the central place not only in the book of Acts but in the missionary work of the Chris tian church. The scene in Acts is symbolic of the victorious contest that Christianity was destined to wage with the heathen cults and philosophies of the ancient world. IV. The Mission Field in Southern Asia Minor. The activity of Paul and Barnabas in Cyprus does not appear to have been very fruitful. The narrative in Acts impUes that they confined their work chiefly to the Jews. It is not even claimed that the Roman procon sul definitely aligned himself with the Christian beliefs. No discour agements or obstacles, however, could daunt Paul or deter him from the realization of the aim which he henceforth set before him. This aim alone explains why he left Cyprus and struck northward into Asia Minor. It was because he was eager to carry the Gospel of Jesus the next stage westward of Cilicia toward the heart of the Roman Empire. Perga, near the southern coast, was left behind, for it was strongly pagan and aside from the great world currents. There also, John Mark turned back, while Paul, sick in body but fearless and de termined, dragged Barnabas with him up over the almost impassable southern headlands of Asia Minor, facing untold hardships, "perils of rivers and perils of robbers," to the commercial cities that lay on the great highway which led from the East to Rome. Here Paul the cosmopolitan again found himself at home. Here, as at Tarsus, Roman organization, Greek culture, and Jewish reUgious zeal were found side by side, even though they did not blend. Here was a field that appealed to the great missionary statesman of early Christianity. V. At Galatian Antioch. Antioch, one of the two chief cities of the Roman province of Galatia, was an important eastern outpost of the imperial city. It lay on an isolated plateau over thirty-six hundred feet above the sea-level and two hundred feet above the western plain. It was guarded on the eastern side by the swift, deep- flowing River Anthios. Augustus, recognizing its strategic impor tance, had made it a Roman colony about the beginning of the Chris tian era. It dominated the surrounding region to which the narrative of Acts refers and was a most favorable centre in which to plant the Gospel seed. Here was evidently a large Jewish colony which had attracted to its ranks many thoughtful Greeks as well as Jews. The official abolition of the local religion increased the possibilities of this new mission field. Through the medium of the local synagogue Paul SS PAUL AT GALATIAN ANTIOCH and Barnabas easily gained a hearing from the more religiously minded citizens of this important metropolis. The sermon which the author attributes to Paul contains many echoes of Stephen's earlier address. In its use of the Old Testament it reflects the current rabbinical meth ods. While its -form may be due in part or largely to the author of this section of Acts, it is an excellent illustration of the sermons which carried conviction to the minds of earnest Jews and Gentiles seeking the way of salvation. The success of Paul and Barnabas in Galatia and Antioch was most marked. The Jews and devout Greeks gathered about them with eager questions. Not only the city itself but the surrounding region which it commanded was stirred by the message of the apostles until the opposition of the more conservative Jews was aroused. The author here as elsewhere represents the apostles as speaking first to the Jews and then to the Gentiles, but the account itself indicates that from the first the appeal was to both classes. Recognizing the universaUty of Jesus' work, Paul in his own teaching and activity had long since broken the bond which stUl fettered the Palestinian Christians. VI. The Apostles' Work at Iconium and Lystra. A positive character and message such as Paul's inevitably aroused opposition and he was soon driven with Barnabas to find refuge elsewhere and a new field of work. They left behind, however, a devoted group of disciples whose joy and spiritual exaltation testified to the divine transformation which had been worked in their lives. Eighty miles east of Antioch lay another important Galatian city. Iconium, un like Antioch, was on a fertile, level plain on the western side of a lofty mountain range from whose sides rushed the stream which irrigated the great plain about the city. The almost constant danger of floods and foreign invasion had developed in highest measure the energy and resourcefulness of its inhabitants. Here the apostles found a flourish ing colony and Jewish synagogue. Jews and Greeks alike responded to their teaching, although certain of the Jews bitterly opposed them. Here for weeks and probably months they conducted a successful mission, but its very success in time aroused the rulers, so that at last the apostles departed amidst taunts and pelting stones. Wearied by constant opposition and in quest of a quiet place of refuge, Paul and Barnabas turned westward to the native town of Lystra, twenty miles from Iconium. It was situated in a peaceful valley, watered by two streams from the western hills. In the midst of the vaUey rose the acropolis, a steep hfll, a hundred and fifty feet in 89 PAUL'S FIRST MISSIONARY CAMPAIGN height. Here the apostles were among a simple peasant people of the old Lycaonian stock. A kindly work of heaUng, wrought upon a lame man whose faith was equal to the task, almost instantly won the adoration of the populace. The narrative well illustrates the com mon popular belief of the day that the gods in human form frequently came down and walked among men. Barnabas, the taUer and more commanding figure, was identified as Zeus; Paul, the smaUer and alert and more gifted speaker, with Hermes, the spokesman and messenger of the gods. Not understanding the native language, the apostles ap parently did not at first understand that the people were about to worship and offer sacrifices to them; but as soon as they appreciated the situation they loudly protested and improved the opportunity to tell them of the one Uving God, whence came all their blessings. Lystra, however, was under the control of the Galatian Antioch and so near Iconium that the Jewish persecutors of the apostles soon over took them and turned the zeal of the populace into mad rage, so that Paul barely escaped death at their hands. Derbe, the next place to which the apostles turned for refuge, was on a great plain about forty- five miles south of Iconium. Here amidst the native population they met with little opposition. This point, however, marked the eastern limit of their campaign, for it was near the eastern bounds of the prov ince of Galatia. Paul, mstead of going eastward along the direct road to his boyhood home at Tarsus and to the field of his eariier activity in Cilicia, was evidently eager to return and perfect the or ganization of the Christian communities which they had estabUshed in the important cities of Galatia. The lapse of time and in many cases the change of rulers and the abatement of opposition made this possible. Hence they retraced their steps, in each place strengthening the disciples. Out of the ranks of each Christian community they selected certain presbyters or elders to direct and instruct the indi vidual members. Evidently Paul was seeking not to buUd up a hierarchy but a democratic brotherhood akin to that which Jesus him self had established during his ministry in Galilee. Thence they re turned through Pamphylia to the sea at Attalia and from there by ship to Antioch, where they reported the results of their work to the church which had sent them forth and the great fact that the Gentile world was waiting eagerly to receive the message of their risen Lord. Within less than two decades after the death of Jesus Christianity had entered upon its world conquest, so great was the potency of the personality and teachings of him who taught as never man taught before. 90 PAUL'S INTERVIEW WITH THE APOSTLES § CLII. THE BREAKING OF JEWISH BONDS [Paul himself states that] Fourteen years after my first Paul's visit with Peter I went up again to Jerusalem accompanied ^" by Barnabas. I also took Titus with me. I went up in and obedience to a revelation. And I laid before them the SnT gospel which I preach to the Gentiles; I did this in private SJeh before the authorities lest by any means I should be running, aP0S- or should aheady have run in vain. But even though coki. Titus, who was with me, was a Greek, he was not obliged 2110) to be circumcised. The opposition came through certain traitorous false brothers who had crept in to spy out the freedom we enjoy in Christ Jesus in order that they might enslave us again. But, in order that the truth of the gospel might hold good for you, we did not consent for an instant to submit to them. Indeed from the authorities — what ever they are it makes no difference to me ; God payeth no respect to persons — these authorities had no additions to make to my gospel. On the contrary, when they saw that I had been intrusted with the gospel for the unchcumcised just as Peter had been for the circumcised (for he who equipped Peter to be an apostle to the circumcised equipped me as well for the Gentiles), and when they recognized the grace that had been given me, James and Cephas and John, who were considered the pillars of the church, gave to me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship that we should go to the Gentiles, they to the circumcised. One thing they urged, that we should remember the poor, which I myself was exceedingly eager to do. When Cephas came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, Pauls because he stood condemned. For before certain persons rebuke came from James, he ate with the Gentile Christians; but p*ter when they came, he withdrew and held aloof for fear of the for m- circumcision party. The rest of the Jewish Christians also Smcy" played false along with him, so that even Barnabas was (U16) carried away by theh false play. But when I saw that they were not acting uprightly in the true spirit of the gospel, I said to Cephas in the presence of them all: If you who are a Jew live like the Gentiles and not like the 91 THE BREAKING OF JEWISH BONDS Jews, why do you oblige the Gentiles to become Jews? We may be Jews by birth and not ' Gentile sinners,' but, knowing that a man is justified by faith in Christ Jesus and not by doing the things which the law commands, we ourselves have believed in Christ Jesus so as to be jus tified by faith in Christ and not by doing the things that the law commands, for by doing those things which the law commands no human being shall be justified. The Now certain individuals came down from Jerusalem and SarS taught the brothers: Unless you are chcumcised after the tfonf*- custom of Moses you cannot be saved. Inasmuch as there to the was a sharp dispute and controversy between them and Mosaic pauj an(j Barnabas, it was arranged that Paul and Bar- [§£§ nabas, along with some others of theh number, should go up to Jerusalem to consult the apostles and elders at Jeru salem about this question. The So they set out, being accompanied for a distance by tation members of the church. And they passed through Phce- *°ru nicia and Samaria, telling about the conversion of the Gen- saiem tiles. And they inspired all the brothers with great joy. ("•*) When they arrived at Jerusalem, they were received by the church and the apostles and elders. And they reported all that God had done through them. Peters But some of the believers who belonged to the Pharisaic g^1 party got up and said, Gentiles must be chcumcised and councu enjoined to observe the law of Moses. Then the apostles and the presbyters met to investigate this question, and a keen controversy sprang up; but Peter rose and said to them, Brothers, you know well that from the earliest days God chose among you that by my mouth the Gentiles were to hear the word of the gospel and believe. The God who knows all hearts attested this by giving them the Holy Spirit just as he gave it to us; in cleansing theh hearts by faith he made no distinction at all between us and them. Well now, why are you trying an experiment upon God by imposing a yoke on the neck of the disciples which neither our fathers nor we ourselves could bear? No, it is by the grace of the Lord Jesus that we believe and are saved, in the same way as they. 92 STATEMENT OF PAUL AND BARNABAS Then the whole assembly was silent and listened to state- Barnabas and Paul recounting the signs and wonders God Sfplm had performed by them among the Gentiles. and' When they had finished speaking, James replied, Brothers, b^ listen to me. Simeon has told how God originally sought The to secure a people from among the Gentiles to bear his counsel name. This agrees with the words of the prophets; as it jlmes is written, c321) After this I will return and rebuild David's fallen tent, Its ruins I will rebuild and set it up again, That the rest of men may seek for the Lord, that they may possess the remnant of Edom Even all the Gentiles who are called by my name, Saith the Lord, who maketh this known from of old. My judgment therefore is that we ought not to put fresh difficulties in the way of those who are turning to God from among the Gentiles, but enjoin them to abstain from what ever is polluted by idols, from sexual vice, from the flesh of animals that have been strangled, and from blood; for Moses has had his preachers from earliest ages in every city, where he is read aloud in the synagogues every sab bath. Then the aposties and the elders, together with the The whole church, decided to select some of theh number toiic" and send them to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas. The {j^g, men selected were Judas (called Barsabbas) and Silas, Gentile leading members of the brotherhood. They bore the fol- §anT lowing letter: The aposties and the elder brothers send <""") greeting to the brothers who belong to the Gentiles through out Antioch and Syria and Cilicia. Since we have learned that some of our number, without being authorized by us, have disturbed you with theh teaching and upset your souls, we have decided unanimously to select some of our number and send them to you along with our beloved Barnabas and Paul who have risked theh lives for the sake of our Lord Jesus Christ. We therefore send Judas and Silas, who wih also tell you these things by word of mouth. The Holy Spirit and we have decided not to impose any 93 THE BREAKING OF JEWISH BONDS extra burden on you, except these essential requhements: abstain from food that has been offered to idols, from tast ing blood, from the flesh of animals that have been stran gled, and from sexual vice. Keep clear of all this and it will be well with you. Farewell. its When the messengers were despatched, they went down tf-») another in love. For the entire law is summed up in one word, You must love your neighbor as yourself. But, if you bite and devour one another, take care lest you be destroyed by one another. 102 THE GUIDANCE OF THE SPIRIT I mean, walk by the Spirit; then you wih not satisfy the The inclinations of the flesh. For the inclination of the flesh Ufce" is against the spirit, and the inclination of the spirit is f.^f against the flesh ; for these two are opposed to each other, o«-») so that you are not free to do as you please. But, if you are led by the spirit, you are not under the sway of tiie law. Now the deeds of the flesh are quite evident, such as The sexual vice, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery, quarrels, JJ'jg, contention, jealousy, anger, rivalry, factions, party spirit, flesh envy, drinking bouts, revelry, and the like. I tell you be- the ° forehand, as I have told you aheady, that those who do ^jjj* these things whi never inherit the Kingdom of God. But the fruit of the spirit is love, joy, peace, forbearance, kind ness, generosity, fidehty, gentleness, self-control— there is no law against those who do these things. Now those who belong to Christ have crucified the flesh The with its passions and inclinations. If we live by the spirit, tS?1" let us walk also in the spirit. Let us not be vain nor given J^of to provoking or envying one another. Even if anyone is (5«-«») caught in some wrong act, brothers, you who are spiritual must set such a one right in a spirit of gentleness. Let each one of you look to himself lest you be tempted. Bear one another's burdens and so fulfill the law of Christ. If any one imagines that he is somebody when he is nobody, he is deceiving himself. Let everyone test his own work and then he wih have something to boast about on his own ac count, and not in comparison with his neighbor. For every one wih have to bear his own load. Each one who is taught should share all the good things of life with those who teach him the word. Be not deceived; God is not to be mocked: for whatever The a man sows, that shah he also reap. He who sows for his ofufe3' own flesh shah from the flesh reap destruction, and he who t710) sows for the spirit shall reap from the spirit life eternal. And let us not grow weary of doing what is right, for in due season we shall reap if we faint not. So then, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all men and especially to those who are of the household of the faith. See what big letters I make when I write with mine own hand! These men who are seeking to compel you to be 103 PAUL'S LETTER TO THE GALATIANS Paul's chcumcised deshe to make a fine show in the flesh. It is Ir'aph simply that they may not be persecuted for the cross of fjgjjg. Christ. For even they who have been chcumcised do not diction keep the law themselves; but they deshe to have you cir- (1") cumcised so that they may boast over your flesh! But far be it from me to glory except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by which the world has been crucified to me and I to the world. For what counts is neither circumcision nor unchcumcision, but the new creation, and on as many as will walk by this rule may peace and mercy rest, even upon the Israel of God. Henceforth, let no man interfere with me, for I bear branded on my body the marks of Jesus. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit, brothers. Amen. I. Date and Aim of Paul's Second Missionary Campaign. Paul probably set out on his second missionary campaign in the early autumn of 49 a.d. He was eager to get away from the dissensions raised by the Judaizers at Jerusalem and Antioch. Acts states that his primary purpose was to visit the Galatian churches, doubtless with a view to strengthening them (Acts 165). He also aimed to prepare them for the problems that he saw before them. His ultimate purpose was to carry the Gospel of Jesus westward throughout the provinces of Asia Minor immediately beyond the Roman province of Galatia which had been the scene of his earlier work. The great metropolitan city of Ephesus, the commercial and religious capital of the province of Asia, was clearly Paul's definite objective. His comprehensive aim even at this period was evidently to conquer the great Gentile world that had been assigned to him at the memorable interview at Jeru salem. Paul sought not only to extend his conquests to the great pohtical and social centres of this Gentile world, but also, at this critical stage, to make each field in which he preached and planted churches the base for the next advance. II. Revisiting the Galatian Churches. Paul was evidently the one who originally proposed to Barnabas that they face the perils of Asia Minor and penetrate again to the heart of the Roman province of Galatia. Throughout this arduous but successful enterprise Paul had taken the initiative. The reason given in Acts why Barnabas did not accompany Paul in his second visit to this field is their disagree- 104 REVISITING THE GALATIAN CHURCHES ment about taking John Mark with them. Probably a deeper reason was their disagreement regarding the right and wisdom of letting Jewish and Gentile Christians freely associate together without im posing on either any ceremonial limitation. Moreover, Barnabas's interest lay in his homeland, Cyprus; Paul's in the unconquered ter ritory beyond his native city, Tarsus. Paul's later references to Barnabas indicate that there was no permanent alienation (I Cor. 96, Col. 410). The separation of these two pioneer apostles to the Gentiles appears to have resulted in a tacit, or possibly definitely defined di vision of the Gentile field. Tradition says that Barnabas not only went to Cyprus but also to Egypt, which early became an important Christian centre. Egypt also had a great Jewish population and might well be regarded as belonging to the sphere of activity set aside for the Twelve. At least some such implied division of territory best explains why Paul with his world-wide outlook and tireless zeal never visited nor even alludes in his letters to the populous land of the Nile and the flourishing cities on the southern Mediter ranean. Starting from Antioch and taking Silas, who was an influential member of the Jerusalem church and likewise possessed Roman citizenship (Acts 1637) and was therefore a Hellenist, Paul set out northward on the great highway that led through Asia Minor to Rome. On the way he probably strengthened the Christian churches which he had estabhshed during the first thirteen years of his ministry in northern Syria and Cilicia. Unfortunately, Luke has not preserved the names of these churches. That there was one at Tarsus is reason ably certain. Thence, following the great Roman highway, they passed through the cities which Paul had visited together with Barnabas. Paul's circumcision of the half-Jewish youth Timothy, whom he wished to accompany him on his visit to the strongly Jewish churches at Iconium and Galatian Antioch, is not a repudiation of the principles for which he contended at Jerusalem but rather an illustration of his avowed purpose, with the Jews "to become like a Jew to win over Jews." Unfortunately Luke, instead of giving details regarding the visit to these churches, has simply introduced one of his general sum maries (Acts, 164' 5). In keeping with his assumption that Paul had accepted the resolutions of James and the other authorities at Jeru salem, he states that Paul formally transmitted these to the different churches. What Paul actually did can best be learned from his own testimony in his letter to the Galatians. 105 PAUL'S LETTER TO THE GALATIANS III. The Occasion of Paul's Letter to the Galatians. The interpreter of Paul's letter to the Galatians is at once confronted with a much-debated question. Did Paul write this letter to the churches in the Roman province of Galatia, which he and Barnabas had estab lished during their first missionary campaign, or was it written to Christian churches farther north organized by Paul in the old province of Galatia during his second missionary campaign? Volumes have been written in defense of each of these positions and New Testament scholars are about equally divided. Fortunately, our appreciation of Paul's vigorous letter to the Galatians and of the superb spirit and personality which it reveals is not dependent upon the answer to these questions. The chief corner-stone of what is known as the "North Galatian theory" is Luke's statement in Acts 166, following his summary of Paul's work in Derbe, Lystra, and Iconium, that "they crossed the Phrygian and Galatian region, the Holy Spirit having stopped them from preaching the word in Asia; when they got as far as Mysia they tried to enter Bithynia, but the spirit of Jesus would not allow them, and so they passed by Mysia and went down to Troas." Many hold that the most natural interpretation of this statement is that, having passed through the Derbe, Lystra, and Iconium, which were in ancient Phrygia, they turned northward to the old province of Galatia and from thence westward to the seaport of Troas. It is difficult, however, to explain why Luke is absolutely silent regarding Paul's activity in this northern province, if it had been significant enough in its results to call forth the powerful letter to the Galatians. In view of Paul's avowed purpose, we naturally anticipate that, after leaving Iconium, he would go directly to Antioch in Pisidia, which also lay in the Roman province of Galatia — in fact, it is almost impossible to believe that he failed to visit this important scene of his earlier work. The abso lute absence of any reference or suggestion, either in Acts or in Paul's own letters, that implies a period of successful missionary activity in the old province of Galatia leaves to the "North Galatian theory," to say the least, a very uncertain and indefinite basis. On the other hand, the churches founded by Paul and Barnabas in their first cam paign were on the direct highway from Syria to Rome, and therefore most exposed to the influence of the Judaizers to which Paul frequently refers in his letter to the Galatians. It is also exceedingly probable that Paul the traveller and Roman citizen would use the term Galatia in its contemporary Roman rather than in its older local application. This conclusion is supported by his custom at other times. In any 106 THE OCCASION OF PAUL'S LETTER case, the definitely known conditions and problems of the south Galatian cities furnish a thoroughly satisfactory explanation of the many detailed allusions contained in Paul's famous letter, so that there can be little doubt that the churches at Antioch, Iconium, Lystra, and Derbe were in his mind as he wrote. If Galatians was written to these churches, it must have been after Paul had revisited them at the beginning of his second missionary campaign. His inability to visit them again, to which he alludes at the beginning of his letter, suggests strongly that he was not in An tioch nor the East, but already actively engaged in his work either at Corinth or Ephesus. Apparently the Judaizers, to which he refers, followed close in his footsteps after leaving Antioch and had worked quietly and almost unknown to him while he was busy in the western field. At the same time the questions involved are the direct after math of the interview at Jerusalem and the reaction at Antioch to which Paul refers. It is probable, therefore, that the Epistle to the Galatians is one of the three earliest of Paul's letters and was prob ably written during the earlier part of his ministry at Corinth. IV. The Literary Structure and Contents of Galatians. Paul's letter to the Galatians falls naturally into four divisions, with an impassioned introduction found in l1-9. Chapters l10-^21 contain Paul's masterful declaration of independence and authority. Rapidly and evidently under the pressure of great feeling, he marshals the im portant events in his own career and especially his relations to the "pillars" at Jerusalem, concluding the description with a statement of the terms agreed upon in his famous interview at Jerusalem and their later interpretation at Antioch. The second main division of the letter, o1-^12, contains his defense of his gospel of freedom from the law and of justification by faith through Jesus Christ. In 513-610 he corrects the possible misinterpretations of his gospel of freedom by defining the moral responsibility of those that hold the Christian faith. The epilogue, 6U"18, recapitulates in short, forcible sentences the chief points for which he was contending and concludes with the usual benediction. This epistle has been appropriately likened to one of the dashing mountain torrents, which in many of the fields of Paul's activ ity leap from the heights above, at first sweeping away all opposition, but in time gradually broadening out to water the plain below. As Sabatier has said, here "unfinished phrases, daring omissions, paren theses which leave us out of sight and out of breath, rabbinical sub tleties, dashing paradoxes, vehement apostrophes pour on like surging 107 PAUL'S LETTER TO THE GALATIANS billows." Here Paul writes as he would doubtless have spoken could he have stood in the presence of the faltering and much-confused Chris tians of Galatia. It is Paul the militant who is here revealed, the man who quickly proved himself the master of every situation into which Providence led him. He is fighting here not merely for the faith of the Galatian Christians but also for the fundamental principles of Christian hberty. It was the age-long issue between the authority of accepted tradition and ceremonialism and the authority of the Spirit of God in the he^rt and life of the individual. The principle was the same for which Jesus contended against the Pharisees, Luther against the Catholic Church, and modern Christianity against ecclesiastical and literalistic con servatism. V. Paul's Interpretation of the Significance of the Jewish Law and of the Work of Jesus. It is evident that Paul's opponents made a strong and plausible appeal to the Galatian Christians. They had the whole weight of Jewish tradition back of them. Their charge that Paul was an iconoclast, who rejected as useless the greater part of the Jewish law, was valid. In comparison with the definite way of salvation presented by that law, Paul's gospel must have seemed to many minds somewhat vague. In supporting his position Paul reveals in this letter his marvellous skill in appealing to the intellects as well as to the hearts of men. His first appeal is to the inner spiritual experience of the Galatian Christians themselves. Was it the teachings of the Judaizers or Paul's gospel which had given them the conscious ness of the presence of the divine Spirit in their hearts and lives ? The phenomena of speaking with tongues and miracles had further attested the divine origin of his gospel. In Paul's mind this evidence of spiritual experience transcended all others. His next line of evi dence was historical. Abraham, the forefather of his race knew nothing of the later law, but to him had been given the divine promises of which the work of Jesus was the fruition. These promises had been given not only to the descendants of Abraham, but to all, both Jew and Gentile, who shared his faith. What, after all, had the law ac complished? In answering this question, Paul evidently drew from his own personal experience. It developed, he declared, a conscious ness of sin, which, on the one side, pointed only to death as its just penalty, but, on the other hand, in opening the minds of men to the need of divine forgiveness, it prepared the way for the fulfilment of God's promises and the accomplishment of the work of Jesus. Gen- 108 PAUL'S VALUATION OF THE JEWISH LAW tiles and Jews alike were subject to the laws of nature, which they believed to be controlled by elemental spirits. Hitherto men had been like immature children, under the tutelage of the law or of their im perfect religious beliefs; but now at last humanity was about to enter into its heritage. Through Jesus, whose central teaching had been the fatherhood of God and man's divine sonship, man had been de livered from its old bondage. "He was no longer a slave but a son and as son also God's heir." Therefore he assures the Galatian Christians that their inner spiritual experience, the consciousness, "of Christ formed within them," was the only and supreme evidence that they were the heirs of the promises given to Abraham and indeed the sons of God. To adopt the rite of circumcision and to go back to the ob servance of the Jewish ceremonial law would be to substitute form for the Spirit and to repudiate the divine heritage which had come to them through the work of Jesus. VI. The Responsibilities of Spiritual Liberty. To Paul, faith and life in Christ had brought liberty. Christian liberty is one of his favorite themes; but Paul always guarded against its interpre tation as license. He strongiy asserts that freedom from the law does not mean hberty to follow one's wayward caprices. It means rather, constant loyalty to the guidance of the Spirit. Indeed, those who "be long to Christ have crucified the flesh with its passions and inclinations." Furthermore in Paul's vocabulary, liberty is a synonym for responsi bility. Not only is the Christian to bear the fruits of the Spirit (which he defines) but also "to bear one another's burdens and so fulfil the law of Christ" — that higher spiritual law which has taken the place of the old Jewish law. The one supreme principle, he declares, in that new law is love: "For the entire law is summed up in one word, 'You must love your neighbor as yourself.' " Thus the epistle opens with powerful invective, which merges into impassioned argument and then in conclusion strikes Paul's ever-dominant note, that of love. §CLIV. PAUL'S MISSIONARY WORK IN MACEDONIA Paul and his associates crossed the Phrygian and Galatian The country, but were prevented by the Holy Spirit from preach- ^°™;0 ing the word in the province of Asia. When they reached Troas Mysia, they tried to enter Bithynia, but the Spirit of Jesus i6«-») would not ahow them, and so, passing by Mysia, they went down to Troas. 109 PAUL'S WORK IN MACEDONIA The appealto go to Mace donia (», 10) Arrival at I-hi-J lippi (U. 1!) Lydia'sconversion The healing of a slavegirl (16-18) The arrest of Paul and Silas (10-24) There a vision appeared to Paul by night: a man in Macedonia was standing and appealing to him and saying, Come over into Macedonia and help us. As soon as he saw the vision, we immediately made efforts to go on to Macedonia, inferring that God had called us to preach the gospel to them. Then setting sail from Troas, we ran straight to Samo- thrace and on the next day to Neapolis, thence to the Roman colony of Philippi, which is the foremost city of the district of Macedonia. In this city we spent some days. On the sabbath we went outside the gate by the river, where we had reason to believe there was a place of prayer; and we sat down and talked to the women who had gath ered. Among our hearers was a woman by the name of Lydia, a dealer in purple, who belonged to the city of Thyatha and was a worshipper of God. The Lord opened her heart to attend to what Paul was saying. When she and her household had been baptized, she begged us, say ing, If you are convinced that I am a believer in the Lord, come and stay in my house. And she compeUed us to come. Now it happened as we were going to the place of prayer that a slave girl met us who had a spirit of ventriloquism and brought great profit to her owners by telling fortunes. She kept following Paul and the rest of us crying aloud, These men are servants of the Most High God; they pro claim to you the way of salvation. This she did for many days. Then Paul, completely worn out, said to the spirit, In the name of Jesus Christ I order you to come out of her. And it came out of her immediately. But when her owners saw that theh hope of profit was gone, they caught hold of Paul and Silas and dragged them into the forum before the magistrates. Bringing them be fore the praetors they said, These are Jews who are making a disturbance in our city; they are proclaiming customs which we Romans are not allowed to adopt or observe. The crowd also joined in the attack upon them, while the prae tors, after having stripped them, ordered them to be flogged. After they had inflicted many lashes upon them they put 110 THE ARREST OF PAUL AND SILAS them into prison, charging the jailer to keep them safe. He, on receiving such an order, put them into the inner prison and secured theh feet in the stocks. About midnight, as Paul and Silas were praying and The singing to God and while the prisoners were listening to f^T'B them, there was suddenly such a great earthquake that it v$™on shook the very foundations of the prison. AU the doors (*"M) immediately flew open and the fetters of aU the prisoners were unfastened. The jaUer, starting up from sleep and seeing the prison wide open, drew his sword and was about to kill himself, supposing that the prisoners had made theh escape. But Paul said with a loud voice, Do not harm yourself, for we are aU here! So, calling for Ughts, the jailer rushed in, feU trembling before Paul and SUas, and brought them out of the prison. Shs, he said, what must I do to be saved? BeUeve in the Lord Jesus Christ, said Paul, and both you and your household wiU be saved. And they spoke the word of the Lord to him and to all his house. Then he took them at that very hour of the night and washed theh wounds. And he and all his family were immediately baptized. Then taking them to his house, he put food before them and rejoiced with all his household at having beUeved in God. The next morning the praetors sent the Uctors with the The order, Release these men. The jauer announced these ofthe words to Paul, saying, The praetors have sent to release Jgj*" you. So now come out and go in peace. But Paul repUed, C"-10) They flogged us in pubUc without trial, we who are Roman citizens! They put us in prison, and now they are going to eject us secretly! Far be it! Rather let them come here themselves and take us out. The Uctors reported these words to the praetors, who, on hearing that the men were Roman citizens, were filled with alarm, and came to ap pease them, and, after taking them out of prison, begged them to leave the city. So leaving the prison, they went to Lydia's house, where they saw the brothers and en- couraged them; then they departed. preach- Then travelling on to AmphipoUs and ApoUonia, they jj?^ reached Thessalonica, where there was a Jewish syna- saion- gogue. And, as was his custom, Paul went in to them and 07M) 111 PAUL'S WORK IN MACEDONIA for three sabbaths argued with them from the scriptures, explaining and quoting passages to show that the Mes siah had to suffer and rise from the dead, and that the Jesus I proclaim to you is the Messiah. Some were persuaded and attached themselves to Paul and SUas, including many devout Greeks and not a few of the leading women. The But the Jews, stirred by jealousy, caUed to theh aid some ktadied idle fellows and formed a mob and set the city in an up- jewi16 roar# Attacking Jason's house, they endeavored to bring (>-•) Paul and SUas out before the people, but failing to find them, they dragged Jason and some of the brothers before the potitarchs, shouting, These men, who have raised a tumult through the whole world, have come here too! Jason has welcomed them! These all violate the decrees of Caesar by declaring that there is another king called Jesus. Great was the excitement among the crowd and the poUtarchs when they heard this; but after binding Jason and the others over to keep the peace, they released them. Paul Then the brothers at once sent off Paul and SUas at ISas at night to Beroea. And they, on arriving there, went to the fiM™a Jewish synagogue. The people there were more noble than at Thessalonica, for they very readUy received the word and daily studied the scriptures to see if it reaUy was as Paul said. As a result many of them beheved, together with a large number of prominent Greeks, both men and women. Paul's But as soon as the Jews of Thessalonica heard that the neyto word of God was being proclaimed at Beroea as weU, they pS^™ came to create a disturbance there and a riot among the crowd at Beroea. Then the brothers at once sent Paul down to the sea coast, while Silas and Timothy remained there. Those who accompanied Paul brought him as far as Athens and left with orders that SUas and Timothy were to come to him as soon as possible. I. Paul's Quest of a New Mission Field. The narrative of Acts 166-8 is exceedingly condensed and leaves us in uncertainty re garding many questions. The inference is that Paul, all the way from Iconium until he finally found himself at Troas, was seeking vainly 112 PAUL'S QUEST OF A NEW FIELD for a suitable field for missionary activity. The phrases "forbidden by the Holy Spirit" and "the Spirit of Jesus would not allow them" are already familiar to the reader of the book of Acts. In Acts 214 it is stated that the disciples "told Paul by the Spirit not to set foot in Jerusalem." This statement apparently points to a prophetic utterance under the influence of ecstasy, and the same psychological phenomena probably lie back of the statements in Acts 16. Accord ing to Acts 1532, Silas, Paul's companion, already had a reputation as a prophet. It is possible that he was the spokesman of the Spirit on these occasions. The analogy of Galatians 22 points, however, to a decision in Paul's own mind made under the influence of a careful consideration of the facts involved. This was apparently the way in whicli he made most of the important decisions of his life. Facts and truths, which were more or less central in his thought, were sud denly and, as it seemed to him, miraculously crystallized into an abso lute conviction which he regarded as divinely inspired and which he henceforth followed unfalteringly. Even though the narrative of Acts at this point is meagre, it is possible to conjecture what were the underlying reasons which led Paul to turn aside from the Roman province of Asia and its chief city Ephesus, which evidently from the first had been the objective of his second missionary campaign. It is probable that already a small Christian community was found at Ephesus and therefore to go there was to break one of Paul's funda mental rules, namely, not to "build on another man's foundation" (Rom. 1520). It was also the seat of an exceedingly popular and strongly intrenched heathen cult. When Paul ultimately visited it, it proved a very difficult field. The province of Bithynia, from which he was also turned aside, was situated in the northwestern corner of Asia Minor. Pliny the Younger in his famous letter to Trajan, written near the beginning of the second Christian century, indicates that Christianity at a very early period had gained a strong foothold in this province. It is not at all improbable that when Paul drew near to Bithynia he learned that already other Christian missionaries had anticipated him. From a topographical point of view it was also a difficult field to traverse, and it is probable that the effects of the ill ness, to which Paul refers in his letters, still deterred him from doing what his indomitable spirit longed to accomplish. Thus hemmed in on every side, he at last found himself at the end of the great Roman highway which led from Syria to Europe. Troas was the door that led across the ..Egean to Europe and to Rome itself, the ultimate goal 113 PAUL'S WORK IN MACEDONIA of Paul's ambition. Should he abandon his well-established policy of pressing on from province to province, leaving no important strategic centres behind him, and follow instead the great Roman highway across the sea? Would he succeed, if he left behind him the more distinctly Jewish background and entered the very different Greek world? II. Paul's Vision at Troas. It is significant that at this point in Acts the history is written in the first person. This personal testi mony continues until Paul reaches Philippi and again appears when he comes back to Philippi on his way to Jerusalem and ultimately to Rome. The most natural explanation of these facts is that Luke lived at Philippi, and that either by chance or previous arrangement he first met Paul at Troas. Ramsay's suggestion that the prototype of the man of Macedonia, who figures in Paul's vision, was Luke himself has much to commend it. The words which came to Paul in his vision from the lips of the man in Macedonia, "Come over into Macedonia and help us," suggest strongly that the one who uttered them was aheady a follower of Jesus and eager to secure the co-operation of the great apostle to the Gentiles. The fact that Paul went directly to Philippi and began there rather than at Thessalonica his mission to the Macedonians strongly indicates that the words of Luke lay in the background of Paul's consciousness when he had his epoch-making vision. Such incidents, as well as the vision itself, were in perfect harmony with similar experiences in Paul's life. Even as the young patriot Isaiah, laboring under a sense of personal responsibility, sud denly beheld a vision of Jehovah in his temple and was thereby conse crated and committed to his life-work, so Paul in one significant mo ment left behind all uncertainty and recognized that he was divinely committed to the evangelization of Macedonia. III. Paul's Work in Philippi. Paul on landing on the northern shore of the .ZEgean passed through the seaport of Neapolis and pressed nine miles northward to Philippi, not the metropolis of Macedonia as the author of Acts states, but the chief city on the southern end of a great plain. This was bounded on the east by a river which lost it self in a huge marsh to the south of the city. Here in 42 B.C. Octavian and Anthony fought their great decisive battle against Brutus and Cassius. Here the ideal of a republic fell before that of an empire. Octavian in his gratitude for the victory made Philippi a Roman colony and gave it a thoroughly Roman form of government. Here Paul found a small Jewish community, too small to support a syna- 114 PAUL'S WORK IN PHILIPPI gogue but accustomed on the Jewish Sabbath to meet for worship by the riverside. In this group Paul found Greek proselytes as well as Jews. Chief among them was a certain Lydia from the Lydian city of Thyatira. She was evidently a woman of great ability and pos sessed of considerable wealth, for she appears to have had a bazaar, as well as a home in Philippi. To her Paul's preaching appealed so strongly that she offered her home as a centre for his work. There he apparently remained for some months. Certain details in Paul's experience at Philippi stand out clearly and are obviously based on the extracts from the journal of travel. The story of the slave girl, "who had a spirit of ventriloquism," gives a vivid impression of the religious and social environment amid which Paul worked. Evidently the girl possessed a keen mind, like many of the slaves to be found during that period throughout the broad bounds of the Roman Empire, for her success in predicting the future of those who appealed to her for a divine response was clearly due to her power of insight and inventive genius. Her attitude toward Paul and his fellow workers indicates that she appreciated the truth of their teaching and that she was apparently eager to help them. Her words and deeds, as reported, are a public confession of faith in their teaching. Paul, however, was evidently annoyed by the fact that that confession seemed to come through the medium of heathen divination. His words to her were therefore of the nature both of a command and of a rebuke. They produced the desired result. Evi dently she had hitherto believed in her miraculous powers; but now Paul's words through suggestion had acted as an inhibition. There fore she could not go on as formerly. Her silence is possibly an index that she accepted the apostle's teaching. That Paul believed that she was possessed of an unclean spirit cannot be doubted in the light of his assertion in I Cormthians IO20. The terms in which he addressed her recall Jesus' rebuke to the man possessed of an unclean spirit in the synagogue at Capernaum (Mark 2ffi). Furthermore, that Paul believed that he had performed a miracle cannot be doubted, for he plainly asserts his conviction that he possessed this power in II Co rinthians 1212 The slave girl's masters, in their mad frenzy, at first succeeded in playing on the prejudices of the Roman rulers of Philippi. Hatred of everything Jewish was then common throughout the Roman Empire, and Philippi was especially jealous of its Roman citizenship. Paul's personal appearance may have also aroused this race antago nism. Soon the city mob was seized with the same fanatical frenzy. 115 PAUL'S WORK IN MACEDONIA In these circumstances it was futile for Paul to urge in defense his Roman citizenship. Without waiting for the formality of a judicial trial, the praetors gave the cruel command to flog him and his associ ates. While Paul does not refer to this experience in his later letter to the Philippians, he does declare in II Corinthians ll25 that he was "thrice beaten with rods," indicating that on two other occasions his Roman citizenship was not sufficient to dehver him from this horrible indignity. It is possible that the account of the imprisonment of Paul and Silas has been influenced by the late tradition of Peter's imprisonment found in Acts 517"42. The present narrative, however, does not claim that the disciples were supernaturally liberated but simply states that a violent earthquake shook the very foundations of the prison, loosening the bars from the prison doors and the chains which bound the prisoners. In view of the insecure construction of prisons in this part of the world even to-day the phenomena described are not without analogies. Paul's action in this crisis is characteristic. As later, when ship wrecked, the prisoner suddenly becomes the master of the situation. Out of sheer admiration and gratitude the jailer, who doubtless had previously heard Paul's preaching and been impressed by his personality, voiced spontaneously the need and the belief that was already ger minating within him. Paul throughout all his ministry revealed a marvellous adaptability to every change of circumstance. Dramatic indeed is the picture of his preaching in the darkness of the earth quake-shaken prison to the frightened jailer and his prisoners. Pos sibly the earthquake was effectual in restoring the judicial prudence of the Roman praetors, for at dawn they sent the command to loose the prisoners whom they had so unjustly treated. Thus it is that Paul was able to gain a hearing for his assertion that he and Silas were Roman citizens, with the result that the Philippian judges came in person to beg their prisoners to leave the town and that they were thankful thus to escape the consequences of their rash action. Paul left behind him at Philippi a small but exceedingly devoted band of Christians that during the rest of his life was an unceasing source of joy to him. Their personal devotion to him was most marked. At least twice they sent funds for the support of his work at Thes salonica (Phil. 416); again at Corinth he was cheered by their gifts (II Cor. II10); and the one supreme love-letter that comes down to us from his lips was prompted by a similar evidence of their affection when he was a prisoner, facing death at Rome (Phil. 410- 18). 116 FOUNDING THE CHURCH AT THESSALONICA rV. The Founding of the Church at Thessalonica. Paul left Philippi, not as a fugitive, but at the request of the magistrates. His plan of campaign is again illustrated by the fact that he passed by the smaller cities of Amphipolis and Apollonia and went directly to Thessalonica, the metropolis of Macedonia. It was majestically situated at the head of the Theramic Gulf in a great natural ampi- theatre and looked southeastward toward the ./Egean Sea. Here the Egnatian Way met the highways of commerce that radiated from the northern .-Egean through the rich plains to the north. Commercially and strategically it resembled Corinth in many ways. It was a free Greek city, ruled by politarchs and proud of its independence and prestige. The opportunities of trade had attracted here a strong Jew ish colony. The Jewish faith had also won many Greek proselytes. As usual, the author of Acts emphasizes Paul's public preaching, especially in the Jewish synagogue. Fortunately in Paul's letters to the Christians of Thessalonica he has given vivid pictures of his work and experiences there. He found hving in this great commercial city expensive. Night and day he worked at his trade of tent-making, while he told his fellow workmen about Jesus (I Thess. 29). The ma jority of the converts were from the poorer classes (II Cor. 82). Most of them were Greeks, for he states that his chief task was to turn them from idols to the service of the living and real God and to prepare them for the coining of his son Jesus, who would dehver them from the wrath that threatened (I Thess. I9' 10). The idea of the parousia or coming of Antiochus or of Augustus or of a god was familiar to the devout Greeks, as we now know from many contemporary inscrip tions. Eagerly they entered into the expectation of a speedy coming of the divine king whom Paul proclaimed. Indeed, as the event proved, they were too eager, for their expectations in time affected unfavorably their ordinary activity (II Thess. 2). Paul's teaching regarding the coming of Jesus was apparently also the basis of the charge which the Jews preferred against him and Silas. While Paul does not directly refer to it in his letters, this is probably the reason for his reference to the Jews as those "who offend God and oppose all men by hindering us from speaking words of sal vation to the Gentiles" (I Thess. 216). Here, as at Philippi, Paul's assailants did not trust to a fair judicial trial but aroused the mob to support their indefinite charge. Warned by previous experience, Paul and Silas had found refuge in concealment. Jason, at whose house they had been received, and certain others of the Christian converts 117 PAUL'S WORK IN MACEDONIA resident at Thessalonica were dragged before the politarchs on the hysterical charge of having entertained "these upsetters of the whole world" who were treasonably proclaiming that not Augustus but Jesus was king. The charge is an echo of that which was brought by the Jewish high priests against Jesus himself. Although the rulers of Thessalonica were especially sensitive to a charge of this kind, they evidently recognized its absurdity and simply put Jason and his as sociates under bond to keep the peace. The incident, however, marked the end of the personal work of Paul and Silas at Thessalonica. Even though their sojourn there had been limited to a few months, Paul emphatically declared: "Our visit to you was no failure" (I Thess. 21). The foundations were laid for a strong, democratic, loyal Christian church, which was one of the crowns of his missionary activity. V. Paul's Work at Beroea. The pubhc attack upon Paul and Silas led the Christian brothers to send them off by night to Beroea, fifty miles southwest of Thessalonica. This secluded Greek town was on the western side of a fertile plain that extended eastward to the ^Egean Sea. It was flanked on the west by Mount Bermius, from whence came cool, flowing streams to water the groves and fields that encircled it. It proved a quiet haven of refuge for the apostles. While Paul would naturally have chosen a more important centre, he again illustrated his zeal and marvellous adaptability. In a short time he gathered about him an earnest band of Christian believers. The narrative of Acts states that he found here a better class of Jews than at the great commercial city of Thessalonica. It also states that his method was not so much that of public preaching as teaching. Here, as at Philippi and Thessalonica, he was doubtless working out with his fellow converts the doctrines that he later incorporates in his letters to the Corinthians and Romans. The majority of the Christian con verts at Beroea were evidently Greeks, and numbered many prominent men and women. This is implied by the narrative of Acts and con firmed by the fact that Sopater, the son of Pyrrhus, clearly a Greek, was the representative of this church, who later accompanied Paul to Jerusalem (Acts 204). VI. The Results of Paul's Work in Macedonia. The chrono logical data in Acts are at this point indefinite, but it is probable that Paul's missionary campaign in Macedonia did not extend over more than a year. It represented days and weeks of intense physical and religious work. Much of it was done in the face of strong opposition; but on the whole it was for him a period of great joy and exaltation. US THE RESULT OF PAUL'S WORK Here at last he demonstrated beyond all question the adaptability of the Gospel of and about Jesus to the purely Greek world. He must also have been profoundly impressed at this time by the readiness of the Gentiles for that new religion. Christianity was no longer the faith of a little Palestinian sect, but was rapidly becoming a universal world rehgion. At this time Paul also succeeded in planting the leaven of Christianity in two of the most important cities of southern Europe, which lay on the main highway that led directly to Rome. The Jewish element in these Macedonian churches appears to have been insignificant. Jason (the Greek form of Joshua and Jesus) of Thes salonica is the only distinctively Jewish name that appears in the record. Otherwise the relatively long list of converts mentioned in Acts and in Paul's letters all bear unmistakably Greek names. Dur ing his work in Macedonia Paul succeeded in establishing especially strong personal relations with the individual converts. As he faced new and more difficult fields, their love and warm friendship, as well as help, were his constant inspiration. During this period also he was training an efficient body of assistants. With the exception of Timothy they appear to have all been enlisted from this new field. We know the names of at least four who were native Macedonians: Sopater, Aristarchus, Secundus, and Gaius (Acts 1929, 204). To this list should perhaps be added the name of Luke. In Paul's later letter to the Philippians he mentions two women and three other men who were his active co-workers. In Macedonia Paul also realized in fullest measure his purpose to make each new Christian community the basis for the extension of the Gospel to other centres. Apparently in no other field did he succeed so well in implanting his intense missionary spirit. Until the very end of his life gifts to the "saints" in Jerusalem and to Paul himself were sent forth by the poor Christians of Mac&- donia whom he had helped so effectually. §CLV. PAUL'S LETTERS TO THE CHRISTIANS AT THESSALONICA Paul, SUas and Timothy to the Church of the Thes- saiu- salonians in God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ: (ition grace and peace to you. Jness' We always thank God for you aU when we make men tion of you in our prayers. We never fail to remember your works of faith and labor of love and steadfast hope • 119 PAUL'S LETTERS TO THE THESSALONIANS Paui-a in our Lord, Jesus Christ, before our God and Father. fSae" ° brothers, beloved by God, we know that he hath chosen for the you. For our gospel came to you not with mere words but of they with power and with the Holy Sphit and with great con- sja^" viction. For you know what sort of men we were among nians you for your sakes. And you are imitators of the examples «°n have suffered from the Jews who killed the Lord Jesus and the prophets. Your countrymen now persecute us and are not pleasing God, but oppose aU men by preventing us from preaching to the GentUes that they may be saved. Thus they continuaUy fill up the measure of theh own sins; but the wrath has come upon them at last! Brothers, when we were separated from you for a Uttle Paul's time (out of sight, not out of mind!), we were the more in- ^ljj5 tently eager to see you, for we did want to come to you — I *g*j did, I, Paul, more than once — but Satan hindered us. For who is ' our hope, our joy, our crown ' of which we boast? Is it not you yourselves in the presence of our Lord Jesus at his coming? Yes, you are our glory and joy! So when I could bear it no longer, I decided to remain The behind at Athens alone, and I sent Timothy, our brother ^d't and minister of God in proclaiming the gospel of Christ, for Tto- your strengthening and encouragement in the faith that V«) none of you might be disturbed by these present troubles; for you yourselves know that they are our appointed lot. And this is so, for even when we were with you, we fore warned you, saying that, ' We are soon to suffer affliction,' and so it proved as you know. I on this account, being un able to bear it any longer, sent to find out about your faith, lest perchance the tempter had tempted you and our labor had been lost. But now that Timothy has just come back to us from you Tim- and has brought us the good news of your faith and love °*h£j? and how you always remember me affectionately, longing <*-8) to see us, as we also long to see you, we have been com forted about you, brothers, in aU our distress and trouble 121 PAUL'S LETTERS TO THE THESSALONIANS because of your faith. For now we Uve indeed, if you but stand firm in the Lord. Paul's How can we give thanks enough to God for you in return jjJide1" f°r 811 me J°y which we experience because of you in the prayer Presence °f our God? Night and day we pray most ear- for the nestly that we may see your faces and supply whatever is j^gf" lacking in your faith. May our God and Father and our n^ Lord Jesus dhect our way to you, and may the Lord make you increase and excel in love to one another and to aU men, even as is our love toward you, so as to strengthen your hearts and make them blameless in holiness before our God and Father at the coming of our Lord Jesus with all his holy ones. The^ FinaUy, brothers, we beg and beseech you in the Lord anda Jesus to follow our instructions about the way you ought to owlla- uve m order t0 please God. You are indeed leading that Homs Ufe, but I write that you may excel in it sttil more. For Chris6- you know the commands we laid upon you on the authority gSq of the Lord Jesus. For it is God's will that you should be pure, that you abstain from sexual vice, that each of you learn to take for himself a wife, who shall be his own, in purity and honor, not to gratify sexual passion as do the GentUes who have no knowledge of God; and that in this matter there be no encroaching on or over-reaching the rights of his brother, for the Lord avengeth aU these sins, as we have aheady taught you and soundly warned you. For God did not caU us to an unclean but to a pure Ufe. Therefore, he who disregards this disregards not man but the God who gave you his Holy Spirit. There is no need that I should write you in regard to brotherly love, for you yourselves are taught by God to love one another, as in deed, is your practice toward aU the brothers in aU of Mace donia. We beseech you, brothers, to excel in this more and more and to endeavor to Uve peacefuUy, to attend to your own business, and, as we charged you, work with your own hands, so that you may Uve worthy Uves in your relations to those about, and not be a burden to anyone. We do not wish you to be ignorant, brothers, regarding those who sleep the sleep of death, lest you should mourn as others do who have no hope, for if we beUeve that Jesus 122 THE FUTURE OF THE FAITHFUL died and rose again, we also beUeve that God by means of The Jesus wiU bring with him those who have fallen asleep, for oUturs we teU you, as on the Lord's own authority, that we who are th°se ahve and survive until the Lord comes wiU by no means Save take precedence of those who have faUen asleep. The t£dia Lord himself wtil descend from heaven with a shout, with faith the voice of an archangel and with the trumpet of God. Then the dead hi Christ wtil rise first, afterwards we who are aUve and survive wtil be caught up along with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in tiie ah, and so we wtil be with the Lord forever. Therefore encourage one another with these words. But as to times and dates, brothers, it is unnecessary The that anything be written to you. For you know perfectly coming weU that the day of the Lord comes as a thief in the night. (5XB) When men are saying, Peace and safety, then aU of a sud den destruction is upon them, like birth pangs on a preg nant woman, and escape there is none. But you, brothers, are not in darkness that the day should surprise you Uke a thief. You are aU sons of the Ught and sons of the day. We do not belong to the night nor the darkness. So then let us not sleep Uke the rest of men, but let us keep awake and be sober; for sleepers sleep by night, whtie drunkards drink at night. But we who belong to the day must be sober, clad in faith and love as our coat of mail and the hope of salvation as our helmet. For God destined us not for wrath but to attain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, who died for us that waking or sleeping in death we should Uve together with him. Therefore encourage one another and let each edify the other, as indeed you are doing. Brothers, we beg you to show respect for those who are con: laboring among you and are your leaders in the Lord and ^ficx? advise you. Hold them in special esteem and love on ac- *ation count of the work they are doing. Be at peace among yourselves. We beseech you, brothers, admonish the un ruly, comfort the faint-hearted, sustain the weak, be pa tient toward aU. See that no one of you pays back evil for evti, but always seek for opportunities of doing good to one another and to all men. Rejoice at aU times, pray 123 PAUL'S LETTERS TO THE THESSALONIANS unceasingly. In every circumstance be thankful, for this is God's wUl in Christ Jesus respecting you. Do not quench the Spirit, do not disdain prophetic utterances, but test them aU, retain what is good; abstain from every form of evti. Bene- May the God of peace entirely consecrate you. May dfction you be kept Spirit, soul, and body, complete and blameless closing until the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. He who caUs tion you is faithful and he wtil do it. Brothers, pray for us. <""**> Salute aU the brothers with a holy kiss. I solemnly charge you by the Lord to have this letter read aloud to aU the brothers. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Super*. Paul, SUas and Timothy to the church of the Thes- tkm~of salonians in God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. Pauls Grace and peace to you from God the. Father and the Lord S6CO.QC1 v 4*i « • > letter Jesus Christ. V'iess. We are bound unceasingly to thank God for you, brothers ; ,IS) ' it is appropriate that we should because your faith is grow- Paui's ing greatly and the love of each of you for aU the others f£!^" is increasing. The result is that throughout the churches (") of God we are proud of you, because of your steadfastness and faith amidst all the persecutions and troubles which you are enduring. They are plain proof of God's justice; you are suffering for the Kingdom of God and he means to make you worthy of it. The As regards the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our jesus°f being gathered to meet him, we beg you, brothers, not to second iet your minds become easUy unsettled or disturbed by (21-?)118 any spiritual revelation, or any declaration, or any letter purporting to come from me to the effect the day of the Lord is now here. Let no one in any way deceive you. It wtil not come until the great act of apostasy first comes and the appearing of the man of sin, the son of perdition, the adversary who vaunts himself against and above every so- called god or object of worship so that he seats himself in the very temple of God, proclaiming himself to be God. Do you not remember that I used to teU you these things when I was still with you ? Therefore, you now know what re- 124 JESUS' SECOND COMING strained him from being revealed before his appointed time. For the secret force of lawlessness is aheady at work, only it cannot be revealed until he who restrains it is removed. FinaUy, brothers, pray for us that the word of God may Paul's spread rapidly and be glorified, as in your own case, and ^ue6t that we may be deUvered from unreasonable and evil men, v™*6* for the faith is not shared by all. But the Lord is faithful; he wtil surely strengthen you and guard you from the evil one. Now, we have confidence in you in the Lord that you are doing and will do what we command. May the Lord dhect your hearts in the love of God and the patience of Christ. We command you, brothers, in the name of the Lord The Jesus Christ to shun any brother who is an idler and not ^in's" living according to the teaching which he received from us. £kitea- For you yourselves know that it is your duty to follow our work example ; we did not act disorderly in your midst nor did we jj£detly eat any one's bread without paying for it. Rather we la- faith- bored and toUed hard day and night so as not to be a burden (»-4 to any of you. This was not because we have no right; it was simply that we might give you an example that you might imitate us. For even whtie we were with you, we laid down this rule : ' If a man is not wiUing to work, he shall not eat.' But we hear that some of your number are idlers and mere busy-bodies. Now by the authority of the Lord Jesus, we command and exhort such to work quietly and eat theh own bread. But you yourselves, brothers, must not grow weary of doing what is right. If any one wtil not obey our command in this letter, mark that man, do not associate with him so that he may be made to feel ashamed. Do not regard him as an enemy, caution him as a brother. May the Lord of peace himself, continuaUy grant you Pare- peace in every sense. The Lord be with you aU. The i!w salutation is in my own hand, Paul's. This is a mark in foe every letter. This is how I write. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you aU. I. The General Structure of Paul's Letters. Deissmann (Light From the Ancient East, pp. 218-221) has drawn a sharp distinction 125 PAUL'S LETTERS TO THE THESSALONIANS between a letter and an epistle. Recent excavations have disclosed many examples of these two types of hterature and have thrown much light upon the literary form of Paul's writings. The epistle was frequently used by the philosophers and teachers of the period to set forth their doctrines. These were essentially essays or discourses set in the epistolary form. Of this type of literature Paul's Epistle to the Romans is an excellent example. Of the simple letter his per sonal note to Philemon or the short note to the Ephesian Christians, found in the last chapter of Romans, are good illustrations. It is difficult, however, to rigidly classify the rest of Paul's writings either as letters or epistles, for the one almost insensibly merges into the other. It is clear, however, that Paul's epistles grew out of his habit of making public addresses and of writing personal letters. His first letter to the Thessalonians illustrates excellently the way in which a personal letter naturally developed into an epistle. With the exception of his letter to the Galatians, which was written to meet an imperative situation and under the influence of hot indignation, Paul's letters all possess the same general literary structure. They open with the salu tation, giving the names of those to whom they are addressed and conclude with the Greek word grace and the equivalent of the ancient Hebrew word peace. It probably corresponds to the blessing which opened every Jewish synagogue service and suggests the correspond ing order in the early Christian service, which was clearly modelled after the Jewish. The salutation was followed by words of thanksgiv ing and of commendation of the virtues of those whom he addressed and a prayer that these might continue. Being a wise teacher, Paul appreciated the value of sincere appreciation as a premise, even to the most severe condemnation. The third element in his letters was a statement of the thesis or doctrine which he wished to emphasize. This represented the heart of each epistle. It was followed in turn by practical moral applications of the principle stated and by earnest exhortations. When Paul wished to add personal notes or directions, these were introduced at this point and the letter or epistle concluded with a benediction, even as did the Jewish synagogue service. Some times Paul places greater emphasis on the doctrmal teachings and sometimes on the direct applications and exhortations, but with prac tically no exceptions each epistle contains these distinctive elements and in the same general order. II. The Literary Characteristics of Paul's Letters. The contents, as well as his frequent statements, leave littie doubt that 126 LITERARY CHARACTERISTICS OF PAUL'S LETTERS Paul usually dictated his letters. It is fortunate that he did so, for the epistles which have come down to us are as a result faithful repre sentations of the exact way in which he talked or preached. All that is lacking are his intonations and gestures, and these are some times implied by the context. It is possible that the scribes to whom Paul dictated his letters were masters of the short-hand system of writing which was well known at this period. As a rule the dictation was taken down on waxed tablets in a cursive script. If the letter was short, the wax impression was sent. If it were long, as were most of Paul's letters, it was carefully copied on rolls of papyrus. In one case we know the name of Paul's scribe. In the short letter to the Christians at Ephesus, which is now found in the sixteenth chapter of Romans, we find this postscript: "I, Tertius, who write the letter, salute you in the Lord." It has been suggested that Paul, coining from the ranks of the laboring class, was not himself a fluent writer and that he avoided when ever possible the mechanical work of writing. The postscript to II Thessalonians ends with the statement: "The salutation is in my own hand, Paul's. That is a mark in every letter of mine. This is how I write. Let the grace of Jesus Christ be with you all." It imphes that he never added more than a line or two and this simply for the pur pose of confirming the genuineness of his letters. His literary style reveals at points the results of his habit of dictating, for evidently the ideas often followed each other so rapidly that the amanuensis had difficulty in transcribing them. This characteristic is especially marked in his passionate epistle to the Galatians (2M0). Like Jesus, he was fond of striking paradoxes, as for example: "When I am weak, then am I strong." Many passages in his episties are characterized by certain rhythmical accents and balanced syllables which are clearer in Greek, yet apparent even in an Enghsh translation. Thus, for example, in I Corinthians 1522- M we read: "And so it is with the resurrection of the dead: It is sown corruptible, It rises incorruptible; It is sown inglorious, It rises in glory; It is sown in weakness, It rises in power; It is sown an animate body, It rises a spiritual body." 127 PAUL'S LETTERS TO THE THESSALONIANS Paul was also a master of the rhetorical climax, as is well illustrated in the classical passage, I Corinthians 1650-64. In this respect there is a striking contrast between Paul the cosmopoUtan, with his varied culture, acquainted with the complex life of the city, and Jesus the peasant, a keen lover of nature, reared amidst the simple life of Pales tine. Jesus' literary style is simple, direct, and limpid; Paul's is complex, often involved, and in some cases even turgid. Jesus drew most of his illustrations from the life of the country; Paul from the teeming life of the city. Both, however, revealed the powerful influ ence of the earlier wisdom teachers of their race and both employed the epigrammatic method in presenting their teachings. Thus, for example, in I Corinthians 36 Paul declares: I planted, Apollos watered, But God made the seed grow; So neither planter nor the waterer is important, But God who maketh the seed grow. The Old Testament which Paul used was the Septuagint or Greek translation. To him all written therein was practically of equal authority. Like the Jewish rabbis of his day and most of the early Christian teachers, he employed at. times the literalistic and allegoriz ing methods in interpreting these older scriptures. Freely he used whatever seemed to be adapted to the point which he was endeavoring to prove. As a result his logic often depended upon the superficial rather than the fundamental meaning of the earher bibhcal passages. His method of reasoning is intuitive rather than logical. His literary style is that of a religious mystic rather than that of the cold, dogmatic theologian. It appeals primarily to the heart rather than to the reason. It is also suffused with a brilliant, glowing imagination and profound emotion. It is inspired by the wide experiences and the deep feelings of the great apostle. Through it all one feels his intense zeal, his kinetic personahty, his heroic devotion, and his warm love for his fellow men. The famous hymn to love in I Cormthians 13 is beyond question the crown of Paul's literary efforts. Of it the classical Greek scholar von Norden has said: "Since the hymn of Clean thes nothing at once so heartfelt and magnificent had been written in Greek." The perennial charm of Paul's literary style, however, is not his logic nor finished literary form but the man himself and the heroic devotion to a great cause which are revealed in every sentence which comes from his lips. 128 THE OCCASION OF PAUL'S FIRST LETTER III. The Occasion of Paul's First Letter to the Thessalo nians. Paul had taken temporary refuge in Beroea in the hope that he might be able to return to his friends and converts at Thessalonica; but developments there rendered this impossible. Hence he turned southward, first to Athens and then to Corinth, from which he watched intently the course of events in Thessalonica. Great was his relief, therefore, when Timothy came bringing direct news. It is evident that Timothy also brought to Paul a letter from the Christians at Thessalonica and that the wording of his first letter to them is largely determined by what they had said to him. Thus, for example, in I Thessalonians 213 he replies, "We also thank God constantly, for you," implying that they had said the same of Paul and Silas. His state ment, "You are our glory and joy" (in 219, 20) probably also echoes the protestations of the loyal Thessalonians who were eager to repudiate the position taken by certain of their number who had openly questioned Paul's sincerity on account of his failure to return to them. The dramatic way in which Paul repeatedly emphasizes and develops the idea of imitation in this letter (l6, 214; cf. H Thess. 37"9) strongly sug gests that they had also declared their determination to imitate Paul in bearing the troubles that were overtaking them. Such loyal state ments fully explain the note of thanksgiving and mutual confidence that runs through Paul's first epistle to the Thessalonians and which beyond reasonable doubt is the earliest of his extant letters. On the whole, the report which Timothy brought to Paul was favorable, but there were some in the church at Thessalonica who had become idle and intemperate (57) and had shown an inclination to go back to the worship of heathen gods (4s-5). Paul, therefore, wrote to strengthen those who were loyal, to warn the weak and wavering, and to emphasize the more important teachings which he had set before them during his initial work in their midst. There is every reason to beheve that in this first epistle to the Thessalonians we have precisely the words which Paul would have spoken, could he have stood in person in the midst of bis Thessalonian friends and converts. D7. The Contents of Paul's First Letter to the Thessalo nians. The thought of this letter is remarkably clear. It is evident throughout that Paul is dealing with definite conditions and needs in the Christian community at Thessalonica. Hearty commendation and thanksgiving are expressed in l5-10. In declaring that the faith of the Thessalonian Christians had been reported throughout the world, Paul was using justifiable kyperbote. It Was the Western 129 PAUL'S LETTERS TO THE THESSALONIANS Christian world which he clearly had in mind. In 213-313 he ardently professes his love for them and his eagerness to revisit them and ex plains why it was impossible for him to do so. In the remainder of the letter (41"12) he stresses certain of his earlier teachings, the impor tance of which he more fully appreciates in the light of the information which has come to him. As occasionally elsewhere in his letters, he speaks on the basis of the direct authority of Jesus (4Z). It is sig nificant that where Paul stands most squarely on Jesus' teachings the social note is strongest. Chapter 41-12 is an important supplement to our gospel records, for it ranks in date and authority with the early collection of the teachings of Jesus attributed by tradition to the Apostle Matthew. The teachings here present the lofty standard of social morahty that Jesus held up before his followers. It does not teach asceticism but absolute fidehty to the marriage relation. It demands still more: the marriage bond was not to be made an excuse for grati fying the sensual passion, but each man is enjoined to treat his wife purely and honorably as a divine creation. This passage is a luminous reflection of Jesus' chivalrous attitude toward the weaker and more dependent members of society and especially toward women. The ideal here set forth is as important and certainly as valid to-day as when Paul contrasted Jesus' standard with the gross and brutal sen suality of the contemporary heathen world. Paul also emphasizes Jesus' law of brotherly love and each man's obligation quietly to at tend to his own business as his first and fundamental contribution to the welfare of society. fc Paul then discusses in 413-5U the much-debated question of what would become of those who died before Jesus' second coining and how soon that appearing would be. In 416 he quotes Jesus as the authority for the statement that, "we, the living, who survive until the Lord comes are by no means to take precedence of those who are fallen asleep." Nowhere in the gospels do we find the exact basis of this statement. Possibly Paul had in mind Jesus' declaration that "he who loses his life for my sake and the gospel's shall find it" (Mark 836), or perhaps the allusion may be to Jesus' mild rebuke of James and John, who asked to have the first place in the coming kingdom. In his general teaching regarding Jesus' second coming, Paul clearly reflects his Jewish inheritance and reiterates the current apocalyptic hopes which are found in the contemporary writings of the Sibylline Oracles, the apocalypses of Enoch, Baruch, and IV Ezra. In his two letters to the Thessalonians, Paul's expression of his belief in Jesus' second 130 THE CONTENTS OF I THESSALONIANS coming reaches its climax — in fact, II Thessalonians marks the begin ning of its subsidence. When a decade later Paul finally faced death, he spoke not of Jesus' coming, but of his going to Christ (Phil. I23). V. The Contents and Authenticity of II Thessalonians. Paul's second letter to the Thessalonians is little more than an ap pendix to I Thessalonians. It has, however, all the characteristic divisions of a typical letter. Chapter 1 contains Paul's words of greet ing and thanksgiving for the steadfastness of the Thessalonian Chris tians. In 2un he aims to correct certain misunderstandings regarding his teaching about the second coming of Christ. In 213-17 he expresses his strong confidence in the Thessalonians. Chapter 31"16 consists of concluding exhortations, and 316"18 contains his blessing, personal autograph, and farewell. Throughout this second letter he repeats and emphasizes the same points as in the first. The parallelism is so close that many scholars have regarded II Thessalonians as the work of another hand. The mark of Paul's style and thought are, however, indelibly stamped upon it. While it deals with the same conditions that are reflected in I Thessalonians, it nevertheless marks progress. In I Thessalonians Paul had poured oil on the fiercely burn ing expectation of Jesus' speedy coming. Now he aims to hold in check that over-ardent hope. In so doing he voices certain popular beliefs which clearly antedate the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 a.d. It is, therefore, far easier to hold that they came from the lips of Paul than from the pen of a later editor. Paul probably wrote his second letter to the Thessalonians only a few months after the first. In timations had evidently come to him that his first letter had been in part misinterpreted and he therefore wrote in haste in order to correct the false inferences which had been drawn from it. VI. Paul's Aim in II Thessalonians. A recent writer (Har nack) has suggested that in this second letter Paul had especially in mind the Jewish Christians in Thessalonica. They, rather than the Gentile Christians, would naturally be most interested in the apoca lyptic hopes which in their origin were distinctly Jewish rather than Greek. Possibly they had intimated that in his first letter Paul had reflected only a part of the current hopes which gathered about the doctrine of Jesus' second coming. In his second letter he adds what was a constant factor in Jewish eschatology. It is the allusion to the arch-enemy of God, the Anti-Christ, whose activity it was believed would reach its climax before the appearance of the Christ to over throw this foe and to establish his visible kingdom on earth. In Paul's 131 PAUL'S LETTERS TO THE THESSALONIANS mind the one who still held in restraint the secret forces of lawless ness was evidently Rome. It has even been suggested that here is a play on the name of the then reigning emperor, Claudius. Evidently Rome had not yet assumed in the minds of the Christians its later r61e of the Anti-Christ. Nowhere is Paul's good sense as a pastor and leader better illustrated than in this second epistle to the Thes salonians. Like every progressive Jew, he still held, as firmly as, for example, we to-day hold the theory of evolution, that the Messiah's work would not be complete until he estabhshed a visible kingdom on earth. It is through these letters of Paul, as well as through the in fluence of the books of Daniel and Revelation, that the old, popular Jewish apocalyptic hopes gained such a firm hold on Christianity that they constantly crop out to-day, not only in the cults of the Millerites and Second Adventists, but even in the earnest exhortations of cer tain of our most popular evangehsts. In the face, however, of all his Jewish inheritance and firm beUefs, Paul strove in his second letter to the Thessalonians to counteract the evil effects of this hope, which, we see, was a mistaken one, and to deliver the church from the perils which threatened it. In the first place, he called their attention to the fact that the present situation did not supply all the conditions which were popularly supposed to precede the advent of the Messiah. In the second place, he held up before them his own example and teach ing, how he toiled hard at his trade, working night and day, even though he shared with them the hope of Jesus' early reappearance. Finally, he enunciated a great and far-reaching economic law: "If a man will not work, he shall not eat." This is the heart of Paul's social philosophy, and it is one of his great contributions to the science of society. It is even more striking, because it was set forth at a moment when he expected even in his own lifetime to behold the end of the present social order. Time and deeper knowledge have demon strated the futility of the old Jewish apocalyptic hopes, the practical evils of which Paul himself appreciated, but the great social and economic principle which he laid down abides awaiting full acceptance and appUcation. §CLVI. PAUL'S WORK AT ATHENS AND CORINTH WhUe Paul was waiting at Athens for SUas and Tim othy, his spirit was stirred within him as he beheld the idols that fitied the city. So he argued in the synagogue i32 PAUL'S DISCUSSIONS WITH THE ATHENIANS with the Jews and the devout proselytes and also in the Pauls market place daily with those whom he happened to meet cjS- there. Some of the Epicurean and Stoic phUosophers also ^gf came across him and certain of them said, What has this the worthless picker-up of scraps of learning to say ? Others and8 said, He seems to be a herald of foreign deities. This f^^8 was because he preached Jesus and the resurrection, i?"-") Then taking him up to the Areopagus they said, May we know what this new teaching of yours is ? For certain things that you are saying sound strange to us; therefore, we want to know what they mean. (For aU the Athenians and the foreign visitors to Athens spent theh time at noth ing else than telling or hearing about something new.) So Paul standing in the midst of the Areopagus said, Pauls Men of Athens, I observe that in every respect you are tT£ most reUgious. For as I passed along and saw the objects £^e which you worship, I even found an altar with the in- Areop- scription, (Sf) TO AN UNKNOWN GOD. Now I proclaim to you that which you worship in your ignorance. The God who made the world and all things in it, he, being Lord of heaven and earth, doth not dweU in shrines made by human hands. He is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything, for he it is who giveth life and breath and all things to all men. He hath created all nations from a common ancestor that they may inhabit all the surface of the earth. He hath also fixed for them theh aUotted periods and the boundaries of theh abodes that they may seek for God on the chance of finding him in theh groping for him, although he is not far from each one of us; for it is in him that we Uve and move and exist, as certain of your own poets have said, For we also are his offspring. Therefore, as the offspring of God, we ought not to imagine that the divine nature resembles gold or silver or stone, the product of human art and in vention. These ages of ignorance God overlooked, but he now commandeth men that they are aU everywhere to re pent, since he hath fixed a day on which he wiU judge the world justly by a man whom he hath destined for this. 133 PAUL'S WORK AT ATHENS And he hath given proof of this to aU by raising him from the dead. its But when they heard of the resurrection of the dead, \%£{ some sneered, whUe others said, We wiU hear you again on this matter. So Paul withdrew from theh midst. Cer tain men, however, joined him and beUeved, among whom were Dionysius, the Areopagite, a woman called Damaris, and some others with them. Paul's After this Paul left Athens and went to Corinth. There Jngat** he found a Jew named Aquila, a native of Pontus, who £°£ had recently come from Italy with his wife, Priscilla, for (18H) Claudius had ordered aU Jews to leave Rome. Paul visited them and, as he was of the same trade, he remained with them and they aU worked together, for by trade they were tent-makers. On every sabbath he argued in the synagogue and tried to persuade both Jews and Greeks. By the time that SUas and Timothy came down from Mace donia, Paul was engrossed in preaching the word, testify ing to the Jews that Jesus was the Messiah. But as they opposed and abused him, he shook out his garments in protest, saying, Your blood be on your own heads! I am not responsible ; after this I wtil go to the GentUes. Paul's Then Paul went to the house of a devout proselyte called S^rin" Titus Justus, which adjoined the synagogue. But Crispus, JjJgJ- the president of the synagogue, beUeved in the Lord, to- 0-1°) gether with aU his household; and many of the Corin thians hearing, beUeved and were baptized. And the Lord said to Paul in a vision at night, Have no fear, speak on and do not stop, for I am with you and no one wtil attack you to injure you; I have many people in this city. So Paul settled there a year and six months, teaching among them the word of God. Paul's But when Galtio became proconsul of Achaia, the Jews fense with one accord rose against Paul and brought him before Gauio tbe tribunal saying, This man is inducing people to wor- piii.) ship God contrary to the law. But when Paul was about to begin his defense, Galtio said to the Jews, If it had been a misdemeanor or wicked crime, I might reasonably Usten to you, O Jews; but as these are merely questions of words and names and your law, you yourselves can attend 134 PAUL'S DEFENSE BEFORE GALLIO to them. I do not wish to pass judgment upon such mat ters. So he drove them from the tribunal. Then aU the Greeks, seizing Sosthenes, the president of the synagogue, beat him before the tribunal; but Galtio did not take the least notice of these things. Then after waiting for a number of days, Paul took leave of the brothers and sailed for Syria, accompanied by Priscilla and Aquila. I. The Athens of Paul's Day. Finding the door of Macedonia temporarily closed to him, Paul naturally turned to the original home of Greek culture. The goal of his journey from Beroea was evidently the great commercial city of Corinth, but Athens, like a loadstone, at tracted him irresistibly. Curiosity and his natural itinerary, rather than missionary zeal, apparently carried him thither. Although stripped of all political power and much of its intellectual prestige, Athens still stood at the height of its material splendor. It contained much that must have been of keenest interest to Paul. During his sojourn of several days he probably found his way to the great Stadium, on the hiUs at the east of the city, which had only recently been com pleted. Here were held the Panatheniac games — a type of sport with which Paul was weU acquainted and in which he probably was keenly interested. In the centre of Athens arose the stately Acropolis, crowned by the Parthenon, the chief glory of Athenian art and the home of PaUas Athena, the goddess of wisdom. About it were grouped the marveUous temples and public buildings which made Athens ar chitecturally the most beautiful city in the ancient world. Paul's attention was probably arrested by the massive temple of Olympian Zeus, standing southeast of the Acropolis, which had been reared by Antiochus Epiphanes, the arch-persecutor of Judaism. Below the AcropoUs on the southwest was the Agora, the centre of Athens's com mercial and intellectual Ufe. On the west was the Royal Porch in which the court of the Areopagus at this period usually held its sessions. On the south was the Senate house, the Hall of Zeus, and the Stoa Pcecile. Immediately to the west of the Agora was the Areopagus, or Hill of Mars, originally separated from the Acropolis by a deep, narrow chasm. II. Paul's Attitude Toward the Intellectual and Religious Life of Athens. In the cosmopoUtan university atmosphere of Athens the Jew from the university town of Tarsus found himself in part at least at home. He apparently spent most of his time in the 135 PAUL'S WORK AT ATHENS Agora. Its intense business and intellectual activity fascinated this cosmopoUtan city dweller. In the Stoa Pcecile, Zeno, the founder of the Stoic philosophy, had lived and taught about three centuries earlier. It was stiU the favorite place where the Stoic philosophers met their disciples and from whence their influence radiated to distant Tarsus and dominated the intellectual life of that great commercial city. Here also Cleanthes, the illustrious pupil of Zeno, had sung his im mortal hymn to Zeus, from which Paul quotes in his famous address to the men of Athens: O God, most glorious, called by many a name, Nature's great King, through endless years the same; Omnipotence, who by thy just decree ControUest all, hail Zeus, for unto thee Behooves thy creatures in aU lands to call. We are thy children, we alone, of all On earth's broad ways that wander to and fro, Bearing thy image wheresoe'er we go, Therefore with songs of praise thy power I wiU forth show. Three centuries earlier also in this same city Epicurus had lived for a considerable period and founded the philosophy which bore his name. The most prominent among the lecturers and students from aU parts of the Roman Empire who thronged the Agora were the foUowers of Zeno and Epicurus. Paul in the midst of this throng appears to have arrested attention both by his appearance and by his actions. In the university slang of the day he was soon contemptuously character ized as "a worthless picker-up of scraps of learning." In this in tellectual life of Athens Paul found much which he could approve. In its strong emphasis on the moral life and in its growing behef in one supreme God back of all phenomena, which Cleanthes so nobly voices in his hymn to Zeus, he found many points of contact. The deeply religious spirit of the city also impressed him. The Roman writer Petronius says sarcastically that it was easier to find a god in Athens than a man 1 Pausanias a century later said there were more gods in Athens than in all the rest of the country. Recent excava tions have disclosed a broken altar which apparently bore the in scription: "To the Unknown Gods Capiton Torchcarrier." 136 PAUL'S ATTITUDE TOWARD ATHENIAN CULTURE The beauty of the Athenian temples and the peerless statues may have appealed to Paul, for his repeated use of building figures reveals a certain interest, but what impressed him most and at the same time irritated him was this evidence on every side of the idolatry regnant in this most cultured city. Luke's Macedonian point of view is evinced in his general criticism in Acts 18a, and yet it was on the whole true of the Ufe of the city at the period when Paul visited it: "For all the Athenians and the foreign visitors to Athens occupied themselves with nothing else than with repeating and Ustening to the latest novelty." Apparently the common people, as weU as the foreign students that thronged the city, were confirmed lecture tasters but lacked the depth of conviction and emotion necessary for fundamental transformations in character and Ufe. The attitude of the Athenian university crowd toward Paul seems to have been thoroughly contemptuous. Here was a voluble Jew who promised them certain entertainment — a re Ugious sensation. Although Socrates had been condemned to death by the court of the Areopagus on the charge of introducing the wor ship of new gods, the Athenians had since the days of Socrates out grown their intolerance and prided themselves instead on welcoming teachers of aU reUgions. It is probable, however, that the court of the Areopagus, the duties of which in earlier days appear to have been the regulation of morals and education, still exercised a certain super vision over the lecturers who were aUowed to present their teachings in the Agora. The evidence is clear that Paul was not placed on trial under a definite charge but that rather he was given an opportunity to present his new teachings in order that the members of the court might determine whether he should be permitted to continue to teach in their midst. IH. Paul's Address to the Athenian Crowd. The scene of Paul's memorable address, as reported in Acts 17, was evidently the Agora, and very probably in or near the Royal Porch, where the court of the Areopagus held its sessions. Paul's introductory words, as weU as the contents of his address, indicate that his audience con sisted not merely of phUosophers and members of the court but also included the Athenian mob, the "worthless pickers-up of scraps of learning," whose decisions, Uke that of every Oriental mob, carried weight with the ruling authorities. To them, as the more hopeful elements in his audience, Paul seems to have primarily addressed his speech. As Professor Ramsay has said (St. Paul, p. 150) : "There is nothing in the reported words of Paul at Lystra and Athens (with 137 PAUL'S WORK AT ATHENS a possible exception of 'the man whom he hath ordained') that several Greek philosophers might not have said." With marvellous skill he adjusted himself to his environment and estabUshed a common point of contact between himself and his hearers. In many respects the principle contained in his address as here reported was the same as is found in his letter to the Romans in l19"32. The passage from the hymn of the Stoic poet Cleanthes, to which Paul aUudes, was one of the noblest expressions of the growing belief among the Greek philos ophers that one supreme personality was back of the phenomena of nature and therefore the ultimate object of aU worship. Equally significant is the similar hymn to Zeus that comes from Aratus, the poet of Soli, in Cuicia, Paul's native province, whom the apostle possi bly also had in mind: Zeus fiUs all the city streets Of the nation's crowded marts; fills the watery deeps And heavens. Every laborer needs the help of Zeus. His children are we. He, benignant, Raises high signals, summoning man to toU, And warning him of life's demands. Here, as at Thessalonica, Paul's aim was to turn the Gentiles from the worship of idols to the one living God. In his broad attitude to ward the Gentile world and in his declaration that the earlier ages of ignorance God overlooked, Paul reveals the influence of the Jewish Stoic who has given us the Wisdom of Solomon, which reads in ll23: "Thou overlookest the sins of men to the end that they may repent." Paul's Athenian audience followed him until he began to set forth the Jewish doctrine of a final judgment-day and to teU of the resurrection of him whom God had destined to sit on the seat of judgment. True to their well-known characteristics, the Athenian audience was divided in its judgment; but contempt or general indifference prevailed. Paul's immediate departure from the city also suggests strongly that the court of the Areopagus, if it passed formal judgment upon his address, refused him the rights of the Agora. The author of Acts, although elsewhere inclined to magnify the results of the work of the early apostles, is evidently here faithful to his data, for he emphasizes simply the few ness of those who responded to Paul's preaching. Paul himself speaks later of Stephanas of Corinth as the first-fruits of Achaia (I Cor. 1615), implying that he regarded his earlier work in Athens as practicaUy fruit less. This outcome of his brief sojourn at the historic centre of Greek 138 PAUL'S ADDRESS TO THE ATHENIANS culture is not so much a demonstration of Paul's limitations as a reve lation of the character of the class to which he spoke. IV. Paul's Skill as an Orator. It is not probable that the author of Acts has preserved a verbatim report of Paul's addresses; but he has given us an exceedingly vivid impression of the consum mate skiU, as weU as devotion, which made Paul the great apostle to the Greek world. In appealing to his Gentile audiences he was handi capped by the strong prejudices then felt toward his race, by his rather unattractive personal appearance, by his involved literary style, by his rabbinical methods of thought, and, above all, by the fact that in his appeal he spoke more to the heart than to the mind. Notwithstanding these seemingly impossible handicaps, he reached and won^many of the most thoughtful and cultured men of his age by his words and by his personaUty. He was like a rushing moun tain torrent that carried aU before it. The source of his irresistible strength was his absolute conviction of the truth of what he spoke and of his divinely given authority to proclaim it. Apparently, never for a moment did he question his caU or the certainty of bis con victions. To this assurance was added an intense earnestness, ac centuated doubtless by his belief that the end of the present order was at hand. Like the old Hebrew prophets, he was ever dominated by an overwhelming sense of responsibiUty and a passionate desire to save men from the appaUing calamity which he felt to be imminent. WhUe on the one side he shared the Jewish apocalyptic expectations, he felt the deep craving of the GentUe world for personal salvation and for the consciousness of feUowship and friendship with the In finite. Hence, his words appeal to universal human needs. He was keen to appreciate these needs but he was equally skilful in adapting his message to his audiences. He had the rare art of "being all things to aU men." He was also conscious of this art and deliberately exer cised it: "To the Jews I become like a Jew, in order to win Jews. To those outside the law, I become as one outside of the law, in order that I may win those outside of the law. To the weak I become as one weak myself, in order to win over the weak." He met the pagan peasants of Lystra and the cultured students of Athens on the common ground of universal reUgion. Having established a close point of con tact, he led them on tactfully to the appreciation and acceptance of his own point of view. To the Jews he appealed on the basis of the promises contained in their ancient scriptures. To use his own figure, he never planted his blows as one who beats the air. To his earnest 139 PAUL'S WORK AT ATHENS and consummate tact he added a profound sympathy for those whom he sought to reach. His method, like that of Jesus, was not negative and destructive, but prevaiUngly positive and constructive. His aim was not merely to interest and convince men, but to save them. The motive power in Paul, the orator, therefore, was not mere logic, but love for men and loyalty to the Master whom he served. Back of his words was his heroic personaUty. He spoke from personal experience, directly out of his own heart, to the hearts of men. To these strong qualifications were added a wide and varied knowledge of the world and of human nature, a bold originality and unusual abiUty in using apt and popular figures of speech and illustrations. These he drew from the life of the merchant, the farmer, the traveller, the saUor, and even the athlete. Colloquial phrases, current in the agora, the forum, and the temple, were constantly on his lips, for Paul was supremely skilful in interpreting the Gospel into the every-day Ufe and thought of the exceedingly varied audiences to which he spoke. V. Paul's Problems and Methods at Corinth. The great metropolis of Corinth lay on the "Bridge of the Sea," the isthmus which separated the Corinthian from the Saronic Gulf. This narrow neck of land cut straight across the shortest natural highway from Rome to Ephesus and the East. Every cargo sent on this route must here be transshipped. Hence it was one of the most important commercial centres in the Roman world. The city was buUt on a broad natural terrace above which its acropolis rose to a height of about eighteen hundred feet above the sea-level. Corinth had been a Roman colony since the days of Julius Csesar. To it had gravitated the most varied population. It was opulent, cosmopoUtan, corrupt, and profligate. Into it had poured, not only the gold and the ideas, but the vices of the East and West. Strategically, it was of the great est importance, for ideas implanted here would readily spread through the Roman world. Corinth was a city well calculated to appeal powerfully to the sympathies, to the heroic daring, and to the broad statesmanship of Paul. Fortune, or rather seeming misfortune, drove him here. Hunted from PhUippi, Thessalonica, and Beroea, baffled at Athens, anxious, harassed by poverty and weakened by sickness, Paul about 50 a.d. entered upon his work in this capital and metropolis of Achaia. For about a year and a hatf he lived and worked here. To support himself he took up his occupation as a. tent-maker. His earliest friends and fellow workmen were Aquila and his wife, Prisca, or, as she is better known by the diminutive form of her name, Pris- 140 PAUL'S PROBLEMS AT CORINTH cilia. They were natives of Pontus, but had lived in Rome until they had recently been expelled by the edict of Claudius, which is dated by Orosius in 49 B.C. Suetonius declares that this expulsion of the Jews was due to a certain riot led by one Chrestus. Apparently this is a popular corruption of the name Christ, and the remark of Suetonius suggests that at this early date the Christians already formed a strong community in the capital city. The fact that Paul early made his home with PrisciUa and Aquila and that he never includes them among his converts indicates that they were Christians before they found refuge in Corinth. Paul's intimate relations with them un doubtedly put him in close touch with conditions in Rome and must have contributed to his growing desire to visit the imperial city. Fol lowing his usual custom, Paul first sought through the Jewish syna gogue to gain a public hearing. SUas and Timothy aided him in his work, but soon they experienced the usual reaction. A majority of the Jews rejected Paul's claim that Jesus was the Messiah; but at least one devout proselyte, and probably several, opened their hearts and their homes to Paul's message. With his usual persistence and boldness, Paul chose the house of Titus Justus, which adjoined the syna gogue, as the new centre of his work. Crispus, a high official in the synagogue, accepted Paul's teachings and his example exerted a strong influence on aU classes in Corinth. So successful was Paul's work that it aroused the usual persecution, especially on the part of the Jews. In their blind rage they dragged Paul before the Roman proconsul, GaUio, a brother of the famous Stoic phUosopher Seneca. Recogniz ing that the case was simply a quarrel between the partisans of dif ferent reUgious sects the proconsul summarily dismissed the case and drove them from the tribunal. It is not entirely clear whether it was hatred of the Jews or interest in Paul and his teachings which led the mob to seize Sosthenes, the president of the Jewish synagogue, and beat him. Their action certainly did not reflect the spirit of Paul's teachings. It is possible, however, that this was the same Sosthenes to whom Paul refers later as a devoted convert. In his correspondence with the Corinthians Paul teUs us that at Corinth he abandoned aU phUosophical discussions and terminology and devoted himself solely to proclaiming in simplest terms the Gospel of the cross. VI. The Results of Paul's Work in Corinth. The eighteen months spent at Corinth were among the most critical and fruitful in Paul's ministry. The 'transformation of the ignorant and corrupt Greeks of this voluptuous city into worthy Christians was the great- 141 PAUL'S WORK AT CORINTH est miracle in Paul's ministry, if not in the early history of Christian ity. Here he was battling with the most seductive and brazen form of immorality which, under the guise of the old pagan religions, had permeated the whole life of Corinth. To this deep-seated immoraUty was added the gross materialism of a strongly commercial city and the fickleness which has always been a characteristic of the Greek race. In the face of all these odds Paul established a strong Chris tian church at Corinth. The so-called First Epistle of Clement, which was written near the close of the first Christian century by the Church of Rome to the Corinthian Christians, speaks of their name as vener able and famous and worthy of all men's love. Elsewhere in the same epistle is found this high commendation: "Who ever dwelt even for a short time among you, and did not find your faith to be as fruitful of virtue as it was firmly estabUshed? Who did not admire the sobriety and moderation of your godliness in Christ and who did not rejoice over your perfect and well-rounded knowledge?" It is from Corinth also that Paul sent his letters to the Macedonian churches and, through the frequent visits of his assistants, strengthened and confirmed them in the Christian faith. Here also he met the attack of the narrow Judaizers who sought to undermine his work in Galatia and even found their way to Corinth itself. Paul's ministry at Cor inth appears to have been one long battle, and the battle by no means ceased when he went on to Ephesus; but in the end he won a victory which marked a great and signal advance in Christianity's conquest of the Roman world. §CLVTI. PAUL'S CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE CORINTHIAN CHURCH The Paul caUed to be an apostle of Christ Jesus through ISp-" the wiU of God, with brother Sosthenes, to the church of Paul's' God at Corinth, to those who are consecrated in Christ s^ond Jesus, called to be saints, as weU as to aU who in every n cor. place call on the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, theh Lord i'"3) as weU as ours : grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. His I thank my God continuaUy in your behalf for the divine reasons gj.ace whici1 has been bestowed on you in Jesus Christ, in ti?^gs- that through him you have been so richly blessed with aU ?«) power of speech and with aU knowledge. Thus in you the testimony which we bore to Christ has been confirmed. 142 PAUL'S APPEAL TO DROP PARTY STRIFE Brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, I beg of Appeal you that you aU speak in harmony. There must be no %JbyP divisions among you, but rather you must be united with ^2*& the same mind and by the same point of view. For I have been informed regarding you, brothers, by Chloe's people, that there are dissensions among you. What I mean is this: each of you is saying, 'I belong to Paul,' and 'I to Apohos,' and 'I to Cephas' [Peter], and 'I to Christ.' Is Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for you, or was it in Paul's name that you were baptized? I am thankful that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius, so that no man can say that you were baptized in my name. Yes, I did baptize the household of Stephanus, but I baptized no one else as far as I know. For Christ sent me not to baptize, but to preach the gospel. For when the world with its wisdom fatied to know God The in his wisdom, God was pleased, through the fooUshness rnes?le of the message which we proclaim, to save those who be- ^|eof Ueve. The Jews demand mhacles and the Greeks seek cross wisdom. We, however, proclaim Christ, the crucified, a comes from God, that we may know the blessings which come from God. And of these things we speak, not in language taught by human wisdom, but taught by the Spirit, interpreting spiritual things in spiritual terms. The unspiritual man does not receive the truths of the Spirit of God, for they are foUy to him and he cannot know them, since they must be spirituaUy appreciated. The spiritual man, on the contrary, can appreciate aU things, although he himself is appreciated by no one. For who has known the mind of the Lord, so as to instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ. The But I, brothers, was not able to speak to you as spirit- detce ual persons. I had to speak to you as worldlings, as babes °ickhof in Christ. I fed you with milk, not soUd food, for you spirit- were not strong enough, and you are not even strong enough Sght1" now; you are stiU worldly. For with jealousy and quarrel- among fog fo y0ur midst, are you not worldly? Are you not act- corin- ing Uke ordinary men? For whenever any one says, 'I belong to Paul' and 'I to ApoUos,' are you not Uke ordinary men? Who then is ApoUos? Who is Paul? They are simply servants through whom, as to each the Lord gave power, you learned to beUeve. I planted and ApoUos watered, but God made the seed grow. So neither the planter nor the waterer is important, but God who maketh the seed grow. Re- We are feUow workers with God. You are God's field, biuty1" God's building. According to the grace of God which was teacher 1=P?en me as ^e w^se master-butider, I laid the foundation; M OT but another builds on this foundation. Let each be careful how he builds, for no one can lay any other foundation than that which is laid, namely, Jesus Christ. Do you not know that you are God's temple and that God's Sphit dweUs within you? If anyone destroys God's tem- 144 thians (3i-') OBLIGATIONS OF THE CORINTHIANS pie, God wtil destroy that one, for God's temple is sacred, obugar and that is what you are. Therefore, let no one boast J^e about men. For aU things are yours : Paul, ApoUos, Cephas, g°™- the world, Ufe, death, the present, and the future — aU are (".^ yours and you are Christ's and Christ is God's. !,'23) You are satisfied aheady, are you? You are rich al- Paul's ready! You reign without us! Would, indeed, that we rebuke1 might reign with you! For I think God hath set forth us £f $£. aposties last of aU, as men doomed to death ! We are made tiSans as spectacles to the world, to angels, and to men. For (48ia) Christ's sake we are fools, but you are wise in Christ! We are weak but you are strong! You are honored, we are dishonored! To this very hour we hunger and thirst, we are scantily clad and knocked about. We are homeless. Wearily we toU with our own hands. When reviled, we bless. When persecuted, we put up with it. When slandered, we try to conciliate. We have come to be re garded as the scum of the earth, the refuse of the uni verse, even until now. I am not writing this to make you ashamed, but to counsel His you as my beloved children. For if you had ten thousand tude1" instructors in Christ, you could not have many fathers. I, f™em it was, who in Christ Jesus became your father by means ("-«) of the gospel. I beg of you, therefore, imitate me. To this end, I am sending you Timothy, who is my beloved and faithful son in the Lord. He wtil remind you of my methods in Christ Jesus by which I teach everywhere, in every church. Some of you have been puffed up, as if I were not coming to you. Indeed, I wtil come to you quickly, if the Lord willeth, and then I wtil learn from those who are puffed up, not what they say, but what power they have. For the Kingdom of God is not a thing of words but of power. What do you wish? ShaU I come to you with the rod, or with a loving and gentle spirit? It is actuaUy reported that there is immoraUty among his you, immoraUty such as is not even practised among the JJS^na, GentUes — that a man has taken his father's wife ! And yet ^ °* you are puffed up! You should rathe/ mourn, in order pant that the perpetrator of such a crime might be expeUed from ™3J5£" your midst. I, indeed, though absent in the body, but <*"•) 145 PAUL'S CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE CORINTHIANS present in spirit,*have aheady come to a decision as though present, namely, that by the power of our Lord Jesus, when you are assembled in the name of the Lord Jesus and my spirit is with you, that individual be deUvered over to Satan for the destruction of his flesh in order that his spirit may he saved in the day of our Lord Jesus. The I wrote you in my letter that you were not to associate mint" with the immoral, not that in this world you are to keep {^ose enthely aloof from the immoral or the avaricious or the who thievish or from idolaters, since in that case you would have uifer1-6" to leave the world altogether. What I now write is, that frn1ly y°u are not to associate with any so-caUed brother who is moral immoral or avaricious or idolatrous or given to abusive (9"u) language or hard drinking or robbery. With such you ought not even to eat. For what business have I to judge out siders? Is it not for you to judge those who are within the church? God wtil judge outsiders. Remove the wicked from among you. The If Christ is preached as having risen from the dead, how vaSing is it that some of you say that there is no resurrection of regard- tne dead. ^ there is no resurrection of the dead, then mg the Christ did not rise; and if Christ did not rise, then our rectfon preaching has been in vain and your faith also is vain. We dead6 a^so are Qetectes he has some knowledge has not as yet attained the knowl- $5.7. edge which he ought to have attained. But if anyone ».i2.u) loves God, that man is known by him. Now in regard to food which has been offered to idols : we know weU that an idol is nothing in the world and there is only the one God. But this knowledge is not shared by aU. Some through theh relation with idols even now eat that which has been sacrificed to idols as such, and theh conscience being weak is poUuted. Food itseh wtil not bring us any nearer to God, nor do we lose anything if we do not eat; while, if we do eat, we do not gain anything. But take care lest this Uberty of yours prove a stumbling block to the weak. By thus sinning against the brothers and wounding theh weaker consciences, you are sinning against Christ. There fore if such food causes my brother to faU, I wtil never eat it again as long as I Uve, lest I should cause my brother to fall. Paul's Do you not know that those who perform the temple rites ^* get their food from the temple and that the attendants at grac- the altar share the sacrifices? In the same way the Lord as an also directed that those who proclaim the gospel are to TJK*1)6 get theh Uving from the gospel. But I have not avatied myself of any of these rights, nor do I now write in order to secure any of these rights for myself; for I would rather die than have anyone render this boast of mine an empty one. For if I go on preaching the gospel, that is nothing for me to boast of, for the necessity is imposed upon me. Yes, woe to me if I do not preach the gospel. For only if I preach it willingly, do I receive a reward. If I do it simply because I must, it only means that I have a stewardship intrusted to me. How then do I get a reward? In that I preach the gospel free of charge, that I refrain from using my fuU rights as a preacher of the gospel. For though I am free from aU, I have made myself the slave of all in order to win the more converts. To the Jews 158 PAUL'S PRACTICE AS AN APOSTLE I have become Uke a Jew in order to win Jews. To those his , under the law I have been as if I were under the law in nS"o order to win those under the law. To those outside the ^^ law I have become as one outside of the law — though I So"1 y am not outside the law of God, but under Christ's law — in ^S^ order that I may win those outside the law. To the weak I have become as weak myself in order to win over the weak. To aU men I have become aU things in order to save some in all of these ways. And I do all of these things for the sake of the gospel in order that I may share in it. Do you not know that in a race, though aU run, only one The receives the prize? So run that you may get the prize. fa% Every athlete practises restraint in all ways; but while they do this to receive a fading wreath, we do it for the sake of one that wtil not fade. Therefore, I thus run with no uncertainty. I plant my blows not as one who beats the ah; rather I maul and master my body lest I, after preach ing to others, might myself be disqualified. So then, let bim who thinks he stands securely take care how to lest he fall. No temptation has waylaid you that has not &$£. come to man. God, indeed, is faithful and wtil not permit ^"L you to be tempted beyond what you can stand; but when the temptation comes, he wtil also provide a way of escape, so that you wtil be able to bear it. Whether you eat or drink or whatever you do, do aU to com- the glory of God. Do not be causes of stumbling either to ***!,_ the Jews or the GentUes or to the church of God. Thus I ga*^°n seek to satisfy aU men in aU points, aiming not at my own service advantage but at that of the many in order that they may be and od saved. Imitate me, just as I imitate Christ. man As the human body is one, yet has many members, and aU the members form one body, though they are so many, o^aJjic so it is with Christ. For by one Sphit we have aU been jjoity baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, slaves chris^ or freedmen. We have all been nourished by one Spirit, broth- For even the human body does not consist of one member ?Jj}£°& but many. H the foot were to say, Because I am not the hand, I do not belong to the body, that would not make it any less a part of the body, li the ear were to say, Because I am not the eye, I do not belong to the body, that would 159 PAUL'S PRINCIPLES OF CHRISTIAN LIVING not make it any less a part of the body. If all the body were an eye, where would the hearing be ? If all the body were an ear, where would the smeU be ? But as it is, God hath placed the members in the body, each as he pleased. If they are aU but one member, where would the body be ? As it is, there are many members and one body. Each The eye cannot say to the hand, I have no need of you, esTen- nor again the head to the feet, I have no need of you. No, toHhe *t is decidedly otherwise. Even those members of the body whole which are considered weaker are indispensable, and the parts which we deem less honorable, we invest with special honor, while our indecorous parts receive a special atten tion which it is not necessary to pay to our more decorous parts. Rather, God hath built up the body and bestowed a special attention on the parts that lacked, so that there might be no disunion in the body but that the parts might have a common concern for one another. And if one mem ber suffers, aU members suffer with it. H one member is honored, all the members share its honor. You, indeed, are Christ's body and individuaUy members of it. Thus God hath set people in the church, first as apostles, second as prophets, third as teachers, then workers of mhacles, then those who are able to cure diseases, helpers, admin istrators and those who speak in tongues of various kinds. Are aU apostles? Are aU prophets ? Are all teachers ? Are aU workers of mhacles? Are all able to cure diseases? Are aU able to speak in tongues? Are aU able to interpret? But always seek the highest gifts. And now I wtil point out to you a sttil higher way. Thesu preme gift: love Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, But have not love, I am become Uke sounding brass or a clanging cymbal. (i3^') Though I have the gift of prophecy, And know aU mysteries and all knowledge, And have such faith that I can remove mountains, But have not love, I am nothing. Though I distribute aU my goods to the poor, And give up my body to be burned, But have not love, it profits me nothing. 160 LOVE'S WAY Love is patient and kind, Love's Love knows no jealousy, (Kf Love is neither boastful nor conceited, It is not shameless nor self-seeking, It is\ never provoked nor resentful, It rejoices not in evil, But rejoices in the truth. It covers aU faults, It beUeves aU things, It hopes all things, It endures all things. Love never fails; its As for prophecies, they shah be set aside, SnT181 As for tongues, they shaU cease, g*- As for knowledge, it shall be set aside, nent For we know in part, a^er And we prophesy in part, C"") But when that which is perfect comes, That which is imperfect shall be set aside. When I was a child, I talked as a child, I thought as a child, I argued as a child, But now that I am become a man, I have put away childish things. For now we look in a mirror and are puzzled, But then we wtil meet face to face. Now I know only in part, But then I will fully know, Even as I have been fully known. And so these three abide: Faith, hope, and love. But the greatest of these is love. FoUow after love and zealously seek spiritual gifts, but orityoi most of aU that you may prophesy. For he who speaks in ecyP " tongues is not speaking to men but to God, for no one un- J?.1^ derstands him. He is speaking of divine secrets in the ecstasy Spirit. But he who prophesies, speaks to men that which is L\il%) 161 87-40) PAUL'S PRINCIPLES OF CHRISTIAN LIVING edifying, encouraging, and comforting. He who speaks with tongues edifies himseh, but he who prophesies, edifies the church. I would Uke to have you aU speak with tongues, but I would prefer to have you prophesy. The man who prophesies is superior to him who speaks with tongues — unless, indeed, tiie latter interprets, so that the church re ceives edification. Therefore, let a man who speaks in tongues pray that he may be able to interpret it. Thank God, I speak in tongues more than any of you; but in church I would rather say five words with my own mind, in order that I might instruct other people, than ten thousand in tongues. The What then, brothers ? Whenever you meet together each s?M°f has something to contribute: a song of praise, a teaching, *jg* a revelation, a speaking in tongues or an interpretation; «-«*. but let aU things be for edification. If there is speaking in tongues, let two or at the most three speak, one at a time. Also let someone interpret. If there is no interpreter, let the speaker keep quiet in church and speak to himseh and God. Let only two or three prophets speak, and let the rest use theh judgment. If a revelation comes to one who is seated, let the first speaker be silent. You can aU prophesy, one after another, in order that aU may learn and aU be encouraged, for the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets, for God is not a God of disorder but of harmony. If anyone considers himseh to be a prophet or gifted with the Spirit, let him recognize that what I write to you is a command of the Lord, li anyone ignores this, let him be ignored. To sum up, my brothers : zealously seek to prophesy and do not check speaking with tongues; but let everything be done in a decorous and orderly manner. I. Paul's Teachings Regarding the Christian's Duty in His Economic Relations. The heart of Paul's second letter to the Corinthian Christians (now found in I Cor.) contains detailed an swers to certain practical questions which they had raised in a letter that Paul had recently received. In the light of the answers it is possible to determine the character of these questions. Each question and its answer must be interpreted in the light of its peculiar Corin- 162 A CHRISTIAN'S DUTY IN HIS ECONOMIC RELATIONS thian background. Corinth, because of its geographical position and resulting commercial activity, was the scene of constant and doubt less bitter litigation. This tendency was intensified by the mixed character of its population. After its destruction by the Romans Julius Csesar had recolonized it with Italians and dispossessed Greeks. Both of these races, and especially the Greeks, were given to quarrels and lawsuits, and the population of Corinth largely consisted of the pioneer spirits who had settled there, or their descendants. Evidently the Corinthian Christians could not quickly throw off their inheritance, especially in the contentious atmosphere in which they lived. Ap parently the question raised by the leaders of the Corinthian church, was whether disputes between Christians should be referred to the^ Roman courts. Paul answered: "No." He argued that certainly there was enough justice and legal insight within the Christian com- * munity to settle all petty disputes. He also called their attention to their belief that the Christians, as heirs to the promises originally given to the Jewish race, were ultimately to sit in judgment upon the heathen. This belief is clearly one of Paul's Jewish inheritances, and yet back of t it hes the great fact that, inasmuch as the true Christians embodied the higher principles of their Master, the injustice and crime of the Gentile world were to be revealed by comparison with the righteous and pure lives of Jesus' followers. This teaching, however, was only . preliminary to Paul's more fundamental treatment of the question. I His ultimate argument rested upon Jesus' law of love. He who de- ( frauds or wrongs another, or even entertains hate against another, thereby excludes himself from participating in God's rule in the world, for such acts and feelings are evidence that God is not ruling in his life. H Jesus' principle of considering first the best interests of the other is apphed, the very causes of lawsuits are removed. The exis tence of such lawsuits, therefore,' is evidence that they have reverted to the old condition from which Paul's preaching and the Gospel of Jesus had temporarily lifted them. Thus, by kindly irony, plain logic, and an appeal to the lofty social ideals of Jesus, Paul endeavored to lift the ignorant and sorely tempted Corinthian Christians to the high level of social living demanded by their Master. II. Paul's Advice Regarding Sex Questions and Divorce. It was inevitable that insistent sex problems should come to the fore front in ancient Corinth. The city was steeped in social immorality. We are told that in the great temple of Venus, which stood on its acropoUs, there were to be found one thousand courtesans. Gross 163 PAUL'S PRINCIPLES OF CHRISTIAN LIVING immorality stalked abroad under the guise of religion. There is little wonder that Paul said with vehemence to his Corinthian converts: "Shun immorality." Licentious feasts and immoral practices con fronted and allured them at every turn. This deadly leaven was even working within the Christian community itself. Some of its members were interpreting Paul's own words, "All things are lawful for me," as an excuse for mere license. They also insidiously urged that, as it was right to gratify the appetite for food, so also the grosser appetites. With his usual skill, Paul met this seductive reasoning. "Yes," he declared, "all things may be lawful, but all things are not good." Waving aside all appeal to the Jewish or Roman law, he de clared that the analogy drawn between the bodily appetites was not valid. The body is not for self-gratification but for the glorification of God. It is the dwelling-place of God's Spirit. Social immorality means the pollution of the body, the lowering of the individual to the level of the harlot, and hence the destroying of the seat of the spiritual life. The figure which he employs to crystallize this fundamental teaching was especially effective with the Greek Christians at Cor inth. The glory of Greece and of Corinth was its temples. The temple was the symbol of the abiding presence of the Deity. For centuries among all ancient peoples its sanctity had been jealously guarded by laws and institutions. Therefore, when Paul declared that the human body was the temple of the Spirit of God, he set forth in a way never to be forgotten one of the most fundamental teachings of Christianity. Paul answers questions of social morality in the hght of the peculiar conditions existing in Corinth. He nowhere suggests that he is laying down universal rules for the Christian world. On only one point is he absolutely certain and that is regarding divorce and remarriage. Here he reiterates in clearest terms Jesus' command, as recorded in Mark IO9"12. No husband or wife is to break the marriage bond and remarry another. The wife may separate from her husband for suf ficient grounds, but is to remain single. On his own authority Paul advises Christians married to unbelievers not to separate. If tiie un believing partner insists upon separation, Paul grants that the Chris tian brother or sister is thereby freed from the marriage bond; but in the same breath he earnestly exhorts all Christian husbands and wives to spare no effort to save their unbelieving partners. The entire aim in Paul's teaching is to preserve the sanctity of the marriage relation even in the most desperate cases. 164 MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE In his advice to the Corinthian Christians Paul undoubtedly reveals a slightly ascetic tendency which is one of the chief bases of mediaeval monasticism and similar modern movements. He frankly states, how ever, that it is not on the authority of Jesus, but simply to insure the freedom of the individual Christians in the Corinthian church and to "secure decorum and concentration upon a life of devotion to the Lord" (7s6' 36). He also says that the chief reason why he counselled those who are able to remain unmarried is the distress that he deems imminent and because he believes the interval until Christ comes again is short. At the same time he does not forbid marriage nor say that it is in any sense evil. In Ephesians 5a_23 we have his true convic tions regarding marriage expressed under more normal conditions. He there uses the figure of the marriage relation to describe Christ's in timate relation to the church. He reaffirms, as did Jesus (in Mark IO9), its divine foundation as set forth in Genesis 22i. Far from con demning it, he simply endeavors to make its bonds so strong that nothing can sever them. He exhorts all wives to reverence and be subject to their husbands. Even though Paul lacks Jesus' supremely chivalrous attitude toward woman, he does assert in Galatians 3M : "There is no room for slave or freeman, there is no room for male and female; you are all one in Christ Jesus." To his exhortation to wives in Ephesians 5 (which reflects his oriental conception of woman) he adds the ringing command to husbands: "Let every man of you love his wife as himself." In I Corinthians 73, 4 he also places the intimate obligations of the husband to his wife and of the wife to her husband on an absolute equality. Here again we recognize the direct reflection of Jesus' absolute democracy and knightly chivalry which have ex alted woman to her rightful place. in. Paul's Practical Application of Jesus' Law of Love. The detailed problems of the tempted and perplexed Corinthian Christians precipitated some of Paul's noblest and most practical teachings. One of these questions was: "Shall we eat food that has been offered to heathen idols?" It is evident that much of the food, and especially the meat thus offered, was later exposed for sale in the public markets of Corinth. Hence it was almost impossible for the Christians to be sure that any food which they might buy had not been thus polluted. This insistent question had evidently developed two parties in the Corinthian church. One echoed Paul's teachings and asserted: "We all possess knowledge; belief is the essential thing. Mere ceremonial questions are entirely unimportant. As long as our 165 PAUL'S PRINCIPLES OF CHRISTIAN LIVING faith is clear and true, it makes no difference what we eat." The other party — possibly the Cephas party — had not yet broken away from their traditional regard for ceremonial distinctions. Obviously the more broad-minded Corinthian Christians found great difficulty in satisfying the demands of these two antithetic positions. Paul meets the situation in his characteristic practical way. "Yes," he declared, "knowledge is all right but it puffs up. There is a higher principle and that is love, for it builds up." Here again he used a word which appealed with peculiar power to the Greek mind. To build was their dominant ambition and genius. Knowledge, Paul declares, is indi vidualistic but love is social and constructive. Thus early in his epistle he strikes that lofty note which forever immortalizes it. His applica tion of the principle of love is as clear as it is convincing. It is the guide of individual liberty. Liberty and knowledge thus guided by love will never permit a brother to ride roughshod over the conscientious scruples of a fellow Christian. In eating food offered to idols, there fore, each man will be governed not only by his own conception of what is right but by the effect of his act upon his less enlightened brothers. Back of Paul's teachings lay his own life and example, which he repeatedly cites with great effectiveness. Forgetting his own individualistic point of view and selfish wishes, he had become all things to all men to win them to Christ. Again adopting a figure very dear to the inhabitants of a city long famous for its Isthmian games, he urges the Corinthian Christians to keep this high goal ever in view and, like trained athletes, make everything else subservient to attain ing it. At the conclusion of this discussion stands Paul's great social confession of faith: "Thus I seek to satisfy all men in all points, aiming not at my own advantage but at that of the many that they may be saved." In this practical way Paul interpreted by example, as well as by word, Jesus' supreme command: "Do to others as you would have them do to you." IV. "The Body of Christ." In setting forth his social, teach ings, Paul employed a figure already used by the Stoic philosophers. They, however, spoke of all humanity as one body. Paul had in mind, when he used this pregnant phrase "the Body of Christ," the collec tive group of Christian believers. It was the objective social realiza tion of Jesus' ideal of the Kingdom of God. It recognized that in this more ideal social group each had his own peculiar gift and task. If one member suffers, all the members share his suffering. As each contributes faithfully to the rest, the whole body prospers. The 166 THE BODY OF CHRIST fidelity of each individual member is, therefore, essential to the welfare of the whole. Hence each individual gift must be consecrated to the common social good. It was from this higher vantage-point that Paul approached the problems presented by the jealousy between the dif ferent members of the Corinthian church and the heartburns caused by the fact that some appeared to possess higher spiritual gifts than others. It is evident from his statements that the intellectual and emotional life of that church was intense. Paul recognized the danger that it might become merely individualistic, merely emotional, and therefore shallow. The picture which he gives of its life is exceedingly illuminating. In his recapitulation he places first the more intellectual gifts: the power to speak words of wisdom and knowledge by the Spirit; second, the gift of faith and the corresponding power of heal ing; third, the more intuitive gift of prophecy, which is evidently here used in the sense of preaching and exhorting; and, fourth, the uncon scious gift of tongues or ecstatic utterance and the power of interpret ing the meaning of these emotional ejaculations. Each, Paul declares, is inspired by the same divine Spirit. Each is of value simply as it is made to conserve the common good. The one supreme aim must be the edification, that is, the building up of the Christian body. V. Paul's Immortal Hymn in Praise of Love. It was while Paul was struggling to emphasize the importance of the motive that should he back of these various expressions of the religious life that there dawned upon him the immortal principle which is crystallized in his matchless hymn in praise of love. It is one of his wonderful digressions, and yet it was the culmination of all of his thinking in the early part of the epistle and the embodiment of his own life and expe rience. He calls it the still higher way in which these spiritual gifts are to be used. With a remarkable breadth and insight he declares that all those gifts that were so highly esteemed in the early church, and even the most passionate self-sacrificing devotion, were absolutely useless unless inspired and guided by brotherly love. Then follows the famihar description of the characteristics of love's way in I Cor inthians 134-7. Its background is the personal ambitions, the jealousy, the self-glorification, the backbiting, the factiousness, and the dis couragement of the Corinthian Christians. Clearly Paul sees the intellectual and moral perils that confront them. Only as they are lifted into the higher levels of faith and feeling can they hope to realize the ideals which he set before them. Childish, indeed, seemed their bickerings. Like a father, he yearned to lead them" on from imper- 167 PAUL'S PRINCIPLES OF CHRISTIAN LIVING fection to perfection, to teach them step by step until they might at tain a perfect vision of truth. In meeting all these universal needs, he declared that not human knowledge but faith and hope and love were eternal and invincible; yet the greatest of all was love. § CLK. PAUL'S MINISTRY AT EPHESUS Paul at When Priscilla and Aqutia reached Ephesus, Paul left SS116" them there, but he went into the synagogue and argued \sn% w*th the Jews, who asked him to stay for a longer time, but he would not consent. Instead, taking leave of them, he said, I wtil come back to you, if it be the wtil of God. Then sailing from Ephesus and reaching Caesarea, he went up to salute the church and then traveUed down to An tioch. After spending some time there he went off on a journey through the Galatian and Phrygian region, strength ening all the disciples. Apoi- Meanwhile a Jew by the name of ApoUos came to Ephe- Ephe- sus. He was a native of Alexandria, a man of culture, Acha'fa strong m ms knowledge of the scriptures. He had been (24-28) instructed in the way of the Lord, and he preached zeal ously and taught accurately about Jesus, though aU the baptism he knew was that of John. He began to speak boldly in the synagogue; but after PrisciUa and AquUa Ustened to him they took him home and explained more accurately to him the way of God. And as he wished to cross over to Achaia, the brothers wrote urging the dis ciples there to welcome him. And on his arrival he ren dered great service to those who by God's grace had be Ueved, for he powerfuUy and pubUcly refuted the Jews, showing from the scripture that Jesus was the Messiah. Dis- It was whtie Apollos was in Corinth that Paul, after pass- ofjohn hig through the inland districts, came to Ephesus and found Iphe- there certain disciples to whom he said, Did you receive sus the Holy Spirit when you beUeved? No, they repUed, we (,9l,) have not even heard that there is a Holy Spirit. Then he said, In what were you baptized? They repUed, In John's baptism. John, said Paul, baptized with a baptism of repentance, telUng the people that they should beUeve him who was to come after him, that is in Jesus. When they heard this, they had themselves baptized in tiie name 168 DISCIPLES OF JOHN AT EPHESUS of the Lord Jesus. And after Paul laid his hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they began speak ing with tongues and prophesying. They were in aU about twelve men. Then Paul entered the synagogue and for three months Pauls spoke fearlessly, arguing and persuading people about the jgethod Kingdom of God. But as some grew stubborn and dis- work obedient, defaming the way in the presence of the multi- Iphe- tude, he left them, withdrew the disciples; and continued (Sf0) his argument every day from eleven to four in the lecture room of Tyrannus. This continued for two years, so that all the inhabitants of the province of Asia, both Jews and Greeks, heard the word of the Lord. God also worked no ordinary mhacles by means of Paul, Mir- so that even towels or aprons which he had used were ut™ carried to the sick and they were deUvered from theh dis- formed eases and evti spirits came out of them. Certain travelling Paul Jewish exorcists also attempted to pronounce the name of (u20) the Lord Jesus over those who had evil sphits, saying, I adjure you by the Jesus whom Paul preaches. The seven sons of a certain Sceva, a Jewish high priest, were doing this; but the evti spirit answered and said, Jesus I know and Paul I know, but who are you? And the man in whom was the evti spirit, springing at them, overpowered two of them and treated them with such violence that they rushed out of the house stripped and wounded. This became known to all the inhabitants of Ephesus, Jews as weU as Greeks; and awe feU on them all, and the name of the Lord Jesus was magnified. Many beUevers also came to confess and declare what they had done. And numbers who practised magic arts coUected theh books and burned them in the presence of Paul. When they added up theh value they found that they were worth about ten thousand dollars. Thus the word of the Lord mightily increased and prevailed. After these events had transpired Paul resolved in the Paul's spirit to travel through Macedonia and Achaia to Jerusalem, $™ saying, After I get there I must see Rome. So he sent two of his assistants to Macedonia, Timothy and Erastus, while he himseh stayed on for a while in Asia. 169 PAUL'S MINISTRY AT EPHESUS The It was about that time that no smaU commotion arose smith's over the way. For a sUversmith by the name of Deme- attack trius, by making silver shrines of Artemis, brought rich Paul profit to his workmen. Calling these together, along with the workmen who foUowed similar trades, he said to them, You men weU know that this trade is tiie source of our wealth. You also see and hear that not only at Ephesus but over almost aU the province of Asia this Paul has drawn off a considerable number of people by persuading them that hand-made gods are no gods at aU. There is danger therefore not only that this our trade will be discredited but also that the temple of the great goddess Artemis wtil faU into contempt and that she wtil be degraded from her majestic rule, she whom all the province of Asia and the inhabited world worship. When they heard this they were ftiled with rage and kept crying out, Great is Artemis of the Ephesians! So the city was fiUed with confusion, and they rushed into the theater dragging with them Gaius and Aristarchus, Macedonians who were travelting with Paul. Paul also wanted to enter the popular assembly, but the disciples would not permit him. Certain of the Asiarchs, who were friends of his, also sent entreating him not to venture into the theater. Now some of the people were shouting one thing, and some another; for the assem bly were in confusion, and most of them had no idea why they had come together. Certain of the mob concluded that it must be Alexander, since the Jews pushed him to the front. So Alexander, motioning with his hand, desired to defend himseh before the people; but when they dis covered that he was a Jew, one cry broke from them aU, and for about two hours they shouted, Great is Artemis of the Ephesians! Then the recorder, quieting the mob, said, Men of Ephesus, who is there among men that does not know that the city of Ephesus is the guardian of the temple of the great Artemis and of the image that feU from heaven? Therefore, since these things are so, you should keep calm and do nothing reckless. But instead you have brought these men here who are neither robbers of temples nor blasphemers of our goddess. If Demetrius and his feUow tradesmen have a grievance against anybody, pubUc ses- 170 THE ATTACK OF THE SILVERSMITHS sions of the courts are held and there are proconsuls; let both sides state theh charges, li you deshe anything further, it must be settled in the legal assembly of the citizens. Indeed we are in danger of being charged with riot in connection with to-day's proceedings, for there is no reason that we can give for this riot. After saying these words he dismissed the assembly. When the tumult had ceased, Paul sent for the disciples Paul's and encouraged them. Then, taking leave of them, he went *°™~ on his way to Macedonia. After passing through these through districts and encouraging the people with many an address, ^o^T he came to Greece, where he spent three months. Just as he was about to set sail for Syria, a plot was laid against him by the Jews. He therefore decided to return through Macedonia. And these accompanied him : Sopater of Beroea, the son of Pyrrhus, Aristarchus and Secundus from Thessa lonica, Gaius of Derbe, Timothy and Tychicus and Trophimus from tiie province of Asia. These went on ahead to wait for us at Troas, while we sailed from PhiUppi after the days of unleavened bread and joined them at Troas, where we spent seven days. On the first day of the week, when we met for the breaking Paul's of bread, Paul was addressing them, for he was to leave on ration the next day. And he continued his address until midnight. jjfut j Now there were a considerable number of lamps in the upper chus " room where we met. In the window sat a young man ('"'a)' named Eutychus and, while Paul preached on and on, he was overcome with drowsiness, went fast asleep, and feU from the third story, and was picked up dead. But Paul, going down, threw himseh upon him and embraced him. Do not lament, he said, for his hfe is still in him. Then he went up stairs, broke bread and ate ; at length after convers ing with them until dawn he departed. As for the lad, they took him away ative and were greatly comforted. Now we had gone on beforehand to the ship and set saU Paul for Assos, planning there to take Paul on board, for this Sort"^ was his own arrangement, since he intended to travel by Ephe- land. So when we met him at Assos, we took him on board (™<) and went to Mitylene. Sailing from there on the foUowing day, we arrived opposite Chios. Next day we crossed over 171 PAUL'S MINISTRY AT EPHESUS to Samos and went on the foUowing day to Mtietus, for Paul had decided to sati past Ephesus in order that he might lose no time in the province of Asia, for he was very eager if possible to reach Jerusalem by the day of Pentecost. His ad- From Miletus Paul sent to Ephesus and called to him the toethe elders of the church. When they came to him, he said, eiders y0u know weU how I Uved among you aU the time since I set foot in the province of Asia; how I served the Lord in aU humility and with tears and trials which came to me through the plots of the Jews, how I never shrank from declaring to you anything that was for your good or from teaching you in pubUc and in your houses, bearing my testimony both to Jews and Greeks of repentance toward God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. And now behold I go to Jerusalem, impelled by the Spirit. What things will befaU me there I do not know. Only I know this, that in every city the Holy Spirit testifies to me that bonds and troubles are awaiting me. But I set no value on my own life, if I may but finish my course and carry out the commission that I received from tiie Lord Jesus to attest the gospel of the grace of God. And now behold I know that not one of you shaU ever see my face again — you among whom I went about preaching the Kingdom of God. Therefore I protest before you this day that I am not responsible for the blood of any of you, for I never shrank from declaring to you the entire purpose of God. Take heed to yourselves and to aU the flock of which the Holy Spirit has appointed you guardians that you shepherd the church of the Lord which he has bought with his own blood. I know that when I am gone, fierce wolves wtil enter in among you, and they wtil not spare the flock, and that many of your own number wtil arise who wtil pervert the truth in order to draw away the disciples after them. Therefore be on your guard, remember how for three whole years I never ceased night and day admonish ing each of you with tears. And now I commend you to God and the word of his grace. He is able to butid you up and give you your inheritance among aU the consecrated. I coveted no man's silver, gold, or apparel. You yourselves know how these hands of mine provided everything for my 172 PAUL'S ADDRESS TO THE ELDERS own needs and for those who were with me. In aU things I set you an example that, working as I do, you should succor the needy and remember the word of the Lord Jesus, who said, It brings more happiness to give than to receive. Having spoken thus, Paul knelt down and prayed with them all. Then they all broke into loud lamentation and falling upon Paul's neck, kissed him lovingly, sorrowing most of all because he told them that they would never see his face again. Then they escorted him to the ship. I. Paul's Journey to Syria. As has aheady been noted, Paul's original objective in his second missionary campaign was Ephesus. He apparently had intended to go there at once after leaving Achaia and to remain. Instead he made a hurried trip to Syria. His reason for so doing is not stated in the biblical narrative and evidently was an open question in the minds of the early narrators. The author of Acts inferred that his object was to salute the mother church at Jerusalem. Under the influence of this inference, Luke, in Acts 1822, has not stated directly but left his readers to imply that Paul actually went to Jerusalem. Here one recognizes the influence of Luke's pro found regard for the authority of the Jerusalem church. There is much evidence, however, that Paul did not revisit Jerusalem at this time. The account of the completion of his third missionary journey in Acts 21 clearly imphes that he had not returned since the council at Jerusalem. At his private interview with the "pillar" apostles the one command which they had laid upon him was to remember the poor with gifts. That he would return to Jerusalem empty-handed is almost incredible. The evidence rather is that he went back to Antioch and there remained for some time. The situation suggests that the reasons which led him to do so, instead of going directly back to Ephesus, were twofold. The first was his need of rest after his exceedingly strenuous and in many ways discouraging work at Corinth. Paul, the native of the seaport town of Tarsus, was naturally fond of the sea and for him the sea journey was ordinarily restful rather than arduous. His remaining for some time at Antioch, even though the crying needs of the western fields were ringing in his ears, is best explained because of his need of rest. The other and probably the principal reason why he returned to Syria was that, after having rested for a time, he might revisit the churches of Galatia. Apparently the strenuous letter which he had written these Galatian churches was 173 PAUL'S MINISTRY AT EPHESUS penned at Corinth and he was naturally desirous of following it in per son. Inasmuch as the land journey was far more arduous, he wisely determined to make it, not on his return to Antioch, but as he, again refreshed, set out for his new field of activity. That he did then re visit the Galatian churches is stated by Luke. This time Paul fol lowed the great Roman highway westward, from Antioch in Pisidia, taking the northern, more mountainous, route directly to Ephesus. Then at last, after having revisited the scenes of his earher missionary activity, he found himself free for work in the chief emporium and political capital of the Roman province of Asia. II. The Political and Religious Importance of Ephesus. The province of Asia was one of the largest, richest, and most closely knit of all the Roman provinces in Asia Minor. Here at Ephesus the Ro man proconsul had his official residence. From Ephesus great com mercial highways radiated to all the important cities of the province, and it was the chief gateway which led over the sea to Corinth and Rome. On the main highway to the east lay the cities of Colossae and Laodicea. Northward, all within a radius of one hundred and fifty miles, were Sardis and Thyatira, the cities in which were estab lished the important Christian churches mentioned in the opening chapters of Revelation. Ephesus was in many ways the most in fluential city in which Paul had as yet worked. Like most Greek cities, it encircled a hill rising about five hundred feet from the plain and crowned with an acropolis. The business and intellec tual centre of the city was on the west of this hill looking toward the sea. On its northwestern slope above the River Cayster was the huge stadium capable of holding fully six thousand people. Here Paul with the Ephesian populace doubtless witnessed many of the popular games from which he draws some of his most effective figures of speech. Farther to the south on the western brow of the hill wastihe great theatre. The remarkably well-preserved ruins which have been ex cavated at this point probably represent a somewhat later theatre built on the site of the one which figures so prominently in the nar rative of Acts. It marked the centre of the life of the ancient city. Just below it to the northwest was the Roman agora, while to the southwest was the famous Hellenistic agora, surrounded by beautiful porticos with public halls on the south. Not far from this point prob ably stood the Hall of Tyrannus. According to tradition, Ephesus was settled by a Greek colony from Athens in the eleventh century b.c. Even before the Greeks 174 THE RELIGIOUS IMPORTANCE OF EPHESUS appeared, the city was already famous as the shrine of a native nature- goddess, whose temple lay on the broad plain beside the Cayster to the northeast of the Grsecc-Roman Ephesus. Recent excavations have laid bare the foundations of this ancient sanctuary far below the huge platform of the great Greek temple of Artemis, which was built as early as the sixth century b.c. Out of the conflicts between the Greek colonists and the priestesses of the native temple grew the famous traditions of the Amazons who fought as men. In Paul's day the temple of Artemis stood seven feet above the plain on a great artificial platform, which had been built on the ruins of earlier temples. It is approached by ten steps, and covered an area of over eighty thousand square feet. Its huge columns rose more than sixty feet above the platform. Standing in solitary grandeur in the midst of the great plain, it appears to have well merited the signal honor of being reckoned as one of the seven wonders of the world. The oracles of the Greek goddess Artemis rivalled those even of Delphi, although they never appear to have exerted as wholesome a political or moral influence as did those of its more famous Hellenic rival. To the temple of Artemis came fugitives from all parts of Asia Minor, for within its sacred precincts they were immune from all pursuit or attack. It was also the great banking centre of that part of the Roman Empire, for kings as well as thousands of private individuals placed their wealth under the protection of the temple authorities, assured that it would be safely guarded. The gifts of thousands of pilgrims swelled the temple's income and supported the vast horde of virgin priestesses and celibate priests, of temple singers and hymn-writers, and of menial servants associated with this ancient shrine. The hierarchy of the temple and those whose income was dependent either directly or in directly on the worship of the temple were always a powerful factor in the life of Ephesus. The city itself bore the coveted title of "Guard ian (literally, Sweeper) of the temple." III. Conditions that Confronted Paul at Ephesus. As early as 44 B.C. the Roman consul Dolabella had granted to the Jews of Ephesus the toleration of their religious rites, the privilege of Sabbath observance, and protection in making pilgrimages to Jerusalem (Jos., Ant., XIV, IO12, M). Augustus had later confirmed these privileges. Paul, therefore, found a strong Jewish colony at this great commercial metropolis. As at Corinth, he also found them unwilling to accept a religion which was offered to Jew and Gentile alike and which set aside as obsolete many of the inherited laws of their race. Ephesus 175 PAUL'S MINISTRY AT EPHESUS was pre-eminently given up to magic and the religious quackeries in herited from the ancient religions. Many Jews were found in a cos mopolitan city like Ephesus who, for mercenary reasons, practised these magical arts. To this class belonged the strolling Jewish ex orcists, the sons of Sceva, who figure in a popular tradition concerning Paul's work at Ephesus which the author of Acts has incorporated in his narrative. Ramsay is probably right in saying that "the writer is here rather a picker up of current gossip, like Herodotus, than a real historian" (St. Paul, p. 273). The story, however, records the in dubitable fact that Paul here came into constant contact with this debased Judaism, in which popular demonology, angelology, and superstition were grotesquely commingled. Modern excavations have revealed hundreds of the magic papyri, or "Ephesian letters," as they are called because most of them were prepared in Ephesus. Although the prevailing religious life of Ephesus was shallow, the spirit of the city was on the whole tolerant. Here all religions of the East and West and of the North and South — Judaism, Gnosticism, the oriental mystery cults, Greek and Alexandrian philosophy, and nature-faiths — commingled; but the prevailing rehgious fashion was to single out and combine what was attractive in each. Hence, as long as Paul did not interfere with vested or financial interests, he was free to teach whatever and whenever and wherever he pleased and was sure of a Uberal hearing. IV. Paul's Method of Work at Ephesus. Again Paul's mar vellous gift of adapting himself to any situation was well illustrated. The narrative in Acts states that he first went into the Jewish syna gogue and endeavored by argument and persuasion to convince them that Jesus had inaugurated the Kingdom of God for which their race was longing, but that they rejected the way of thinking and Uving which he proclaimed. Then Paul adopted and followed a daily pro gramme which evidently fitted the peculiar conditions of that ancient Ionian city in which the working hours for all classes began with sun rise and extended to eleven o'clock in the morning. The remainder of the day they spent in their homes or at public places. Paul ap parently plied his trade of tent-maker during business hours. Then, when the lecture hours of the public philosophers and rhetoricians were over, he secured the lecture hall of one of them, a certain Tyrannus, and, as is recorded in the Beza text, argued publicly from eleven to four each day. In closely crowded Ephesus many were doubtiess attracted to the lecture room of Paul the Christian philosopher. Jews 176 PAUL'S METHOD OF WORK and Greeks, and many visiting strangers from the neighboring cities of Asia listened to his fervid appeals. In Ephesus Paul himself must have become intimately acquainted with the mystery-religions of Asia Minor from which are drawn many of the figures of speech that appear in his later letters. His epistle to the near-by church of Colossae is an excellent illustration of the way in which he probably combated the prevalent gnostic doctrines. At Ephesus Paul built on foundations already laid by his co-workers Priscilla and Aquila, if not by earher Christian apostles. In thus build ing he departed from his general rule of action because he recognized the great strategic importance of Ephesus. Evidently he made it the base for missionary activity throughout Asia. Epaphras and probably Timothy were sent to estabhsh a Christian community in Colossae (Col. I1*7). Tychicus possibly did similar pioneer work in Laodicea (Eph. 6a). The personal letter appended in chapter 16 to the Epistle to the Romans was evidently written to the Christians of Ephesus (cf., e. g., Rom. 16s) from Corinth, after Paul had left the capital city of Asia. In it are found warm personal greetings addressed to his fellow workers in Asia. Twenty-four in all are mentioned in this short letter. It suggests how weU and how broadly Paul's work at Ephesus was organized and that Ephesus was but the centre through which he sought to reach all the important cities in southwestern Asia Minor. V. Paul's Conflict with the Pagan Cults. For a considerable period Paul's work seems to have met with little opposition. In his contest with the Jewish exorcists the sympathy of a majority of the Ephesian populace was with him, for the anti-Jewish feeling was evi dently strong. He does not appear to have come into direct conflict with the authorities of the temple of Artemis. The Asiarchs, some of whom sympathized with Paul, were the official local representatives in the province of the worship of the emperor and of Rome. Their task at this period was apparently more political than religious, for the bitter conflict between Christianity and the Roman emperor- worship still lay in the future. According to Acts, the first strong opposition to Paul's teaching came from organized labor and was due to the fact that his teachings had aheady gained a wide acceptance throughout the city. One of the favorite offerings of the pilgrims to the temple of Artemis was a votive image, which was presented to the goddess by the offerer and left within the temple precincts. These votive images represented the goddess seated on a throne. Those 177 PAUL'S MINISTRY AT EPHESUS offered by the poorer people were usually made of terrarcotta. The wealthy brought images of silver. The guild of the silversmiths, of which Demetrius was the spokesman, evidently manufactured these silver images. Contemporary inscriptions indicate that there were many guilds of manual workers in ancient Ephesus. Thus, for example, the guilds of the wool-workers, of the surveyors, and of the workmen before the gate are mentioned in the inscriptions. They constituted, therefore, an important class in this commercial metropoUs and were able by the cry of class interest to stir the mob to action. While sub ject to the strict supervision of Rome, Ephesus still enjoyed the demo cratic organization of a typical Greek city. It had its senate and in addition its popular assembly. In the pecuUar civic organization of the cities of Asia Minor, the recorder or clerk was the leading official, as appears in the narrative of Acts. This narrative is probably cor rect in stating that he opposed the class uprising, fearing Roman sus picion and possible interposition. Either through ignorance of facts or intentionally the author of Acts has failed to speak of the greater misfortunes which overtook Paul. In fact, the exact order of events is not entirely clear, although it is obvious that the scene in the theatre, at which Paul was not present, occurred during the latter part of his sojourn at Ephesus and was probably one of the causes of his ultimate departure. Paul himself declared that he fought with wild beasts at Ephesus and many are inclined to interpret these words Uterally. It is possible, however, that he had in mind the infuriated mob which sought his life and that of his associates. In a later letter, written to the Corinthian Christians from Ephesus, he states that he nearly lost his life there (II Cor. II23). There can be little doubt that the closing months of his activity were marked by bitter opposition and persecution. VI. The Results of Paul's Work at Ephesus. Paul spent more time and apparently suffered more bitter persecution at Ephesus than at any other city that he visited except Rome, where he at last gave his life for the cause he served. At Ephesus also he had to con tend against a complex of false philosophies, as well as pagan super stitions. And yet it proved a most fruitful field. In writing from there to the Corinthians he declared: "A great door'is opened to me" (I Cor. 169). There he was able to rally about him an exceedingly loyal band of helpers. In the Ephesian letter, appended to Romans, he speaks of "Priscilla and Aquila, my fellow workers in Jesus who for my life laid down their own necks" (Rom. 16s- 4). Two others, 178 THE RESULTS OF PAUL'S WORK Andronicus and Junius, shared a prison experience with him. Ephesus and the province of Asia in the succeeding centuries proved one of the great strongholds of Christianity, and yet the results of Paul's per sonal work there appear to have been far less permanent than else where. We have no record that he ever again visited or wrote any other letter to the Ephesian Christians except the short personal note in Romans 16. Even in this he urges his fellow workers' at Ephesus to keep their eye on "those who stir up dissensions and put hindrances in your way, contrary to the doctrine which you have been taught. Avoid them. Such creatures are no servants of Christ our Lord, they are slaves of their own base desires; with their plausible and pious talk they beguile the hearts of unsuspecting people." In Paul's later ad dress to the Ephesian elders he is represented as warning them that "fierce wolves will get in among them, and they will not spare the flock"; also that "men of their own number will arise with perversions of the truth to draw the disciples after them" (Acts 2129- 30). These statements point to the many heretical and especially gnostic doctrines that sprang spontaneously from the already infected soil of Ephesus. In their earher dealings with Rome the citizens of Ephesus had repeat edly shown themselves exceedingly fickle. The same impression re garding the Ephesian church is conveyed by the letter addressed to it in Revelation 24> 5. The two letters to Timothy, to whose care the Christian communities in Asia were intrusted, indicate that the loyalty to Paul which had characterized the other churches of his planting was lacking here. II Timothy l15 contains the sweeping statement: "You know that all who are in Asia have turned away from me." While their nominal allegiance appears to have been trans ferred from Paul to John the presbyter and other apostohc leaders, the pioneer work of Paul remained the foundation of the church in Asia, and the principles laid down by him reappear in the rich Johan nine Uterature that later sprang from Ephesus (§ CLXIX). § CLX. PAUL'S INTERPRETATION OF JESUS' SAVING WORK Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to be an apostle, Greet- set apart for the gospel of God concerning Jesus Christ ^0m. our Lord, through whom I have received grace and a com- »'• '¦') mission to promote obedience to the faith for his name's sake among aU the GentUes, among whom are you also, who are called to belong to Jesus Christ; to all in Rome who 179 PAUL'S INTERPRETATION OF JESUS' WORK are beloved by God, caUed to be saints, Grace and peace from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. Paul's Fhst of aU, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for tfon to you aU, because your faith is reported throughout the whole Roman world. God is my witness, the God whom I serve with my church spirit in the gospel of his Son, how unceasingly I always 1S) mention you in my prayers, asking if at last the way may be opened to me by God's will to come to you. For I long to see you that I may impart to you some spiritual gift for your strengthening or, in other words, that I may be comforted by meeting you, I by your faith and you by mine. Brothers, I would not have you ignorant that I have often purposed to come to you (though hitherto I have been prevented) so as to have some results among you, as well as among the rest of the Gentiles. I have an obligation to Greeks and to barbarians, to wise and to foolish alike. Hence my eager ness to preach the gospel to you also who are in Rome. Thesis: I indeed am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is God's eous-*" saving power for everyone who has faith, for the Jew first romes and for the Creek as weU. In that gospel God's righteous- thr116 h ness *s revea^ed Dv feith to develop faith, as it is written: faithue Now the righteous shall Uve by faith. ("-") For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against aU Failure the impurity and wickedness of those who hinder the truth Sea-e by theh wickedness, for what is to be known of God is *^d plain to them; for God himseh hath made it plain. For, obtain s"lce *^e creat^on °* the world, his invisible things, his right? everlasting power and divine nature, have been clearly £°£f perceptible in what he hath made, that they may have no Snick8 excuse- Though they knew God, they have not glorified of faith him as God nor given him thanks; they have given them- things of the flesh, but those who are spiritually minded in cline to the things of the spirit. The inclinations of the flesh mean death, but the inclinations of the sphit hfe and peace. For the inclinations of the flesh are hostile to God, for they do not submit to the wtil of God (indeed they can not). Those who are in the flesh cannot please God, but you are not in the flesh but in the spirit, if tiie Spirit of God dweUs in you. Anyone who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him. But, if Christ is within you, though the body is dead as a result of sin, the spirit is Uving as a result of righteousness. And, if the Spirit of him who raised up Jesus from the dead dweUs within you, then he who raised Christ Jesus from the dead wtil also make your mortal bodies Uve because his Spirit is dwelling within you. So then, brothers, we are under no obligation to the obiigar flesh to Uve by the flesh. If you Uve by the flesh you must |ndS die, but, if by the sphit you put to death the deeds of the f£j£~oi body, you will Uve. For as many as are led by the Spirit spin- of God these are the sons of God. For you have not re- son. ceived a slavish spirit that would make you fear again; ^?7) but you have received the spirit of sonship, whereby we cry, Abba Father! This Spirit bears witness with our own spirit that we are children of God; and if children then heirs, hehs of God and hehs with Christ also; for we share his suffering in order to share his glory. I consider that the sufferings of this present Ufe are not Man's worthy to be compared to the glory which shaU be revealed ISp to us. Even the creation waits in eager expectation for the ™ <*° d revealing of the sons of God. For the creation was sub- goal of jected to vanity, not by its own choice but by him who thus K~ subjected it, whose hope being that creation itseh will also (18a6) be deUvered from the bondage of corruption and gain the glorious Uberty of the chUdren of God. For we know that 183 PAUL'S INTERPRETATION OF JESUS' WORK even until now the whole creation sighs and throbs in pain; and not only so but we ourselves also, who have the first- fruits of the Spirit, sigh to ourselves as we wait for the de Uverance of our body that means our adoption as sons. By this hope we were saved. But hope that is seen is not hope. Whoever hopes for what he sees aheady ? But, if we hope for something that we do not see, we wait for it patiently. Assis- So also the Spirit helps us in our weakness; for we do ofnce not know how to pray as we ought, but the Spirit pleads for f0lri'{! us with sighs that cannot be uttered, and he who searcheth (!?,'") hearts knoweth what is in the mind of the Spirit, for the Spirit pleads for the saints according to the wtil of God. Eon of We know also that to those who love God, even those who who6 are called according to his purpose, aU things work together J?J| for good. For those whom he knew beforehand he also M appointed beforehand that they might be transformed into the likeness of his Son, that he might be the first-born of a great brotherhood. Then he also caUed those whom he had appointed beforehand, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified. invui- What then shall we say to aU this? li God is for us, secu?le who can be against us ? WUl not he who spared not his those f own S°n but gave him up for us all freely give us aU things? who Who wtil lay a charge against those whom God hath chosen ? GodV When God acquitteth, who wtil condemn? WUl Christ vealed' Jesus ' — ne wn0 died, yes, and rather who was raised through from the dead, who is at God's right hand, who also pleads ), and IV Ezra (37), Adam, the traditional forefather of the human race, is re garded as the source of all the sin and woe which he has transmitted to his descendants. The burdening beUef that all flesh was bowed to earth by a crushing, cumulative weight of sin was shared alike by Stoic philosophers and thoughtful Jews. In his own spiritual ex perience of Jesus and in that of his fellow Christians Paul found the fulfilment of aU his inherited hopes and beliefs and the solution of all his spiritual problems. It was also inevitable that he should interpret Jesus and his work in the Ught of these varied inheritances. To ignore this fact is to misinterpret Paul and to fail to appreciate his perma nent contributions to Christianity which are enmeshed in the figures and beliefs of a bygone age. V. Paul's Doctrine of Salvation through Faith in Christ. To understand Paul's teachings it is also important to note that he is fond of using a great variety of figures to set forth the same ultimate truth. This method is a characteristic of most great religious teachers. The more important the truth the more important that it be viewed from many points. Paul, in his endeavor to make clear what Christ has done for him and could do for all men, used four familiar figures, each drawn from the legal vocabulary of his age. It is evident that they all represent the same vital experience in the life of the individual. The first, that of the redemption or emancipation of a slave from bondage, was grimly suggestive and famiUar to every citizen of that 188 SALVATION THROUGH FAITH IN CHRIST ancient world. It was probably suggested by Jesus' words, recorded in Mark IO45: "The Son of man has come not to be served but to serve (as a slave) and to give his life as a ransom for many (slaves)." The underlying idea is closely related to Paul's characteristic doctrine of Christian liberty. By its use he declared that Jesus came to free men from the bondage of that merely judical relationship to God of which Paul frequently speaks and which in his experience he found so onerous. Another figure was that of justification or acquittal. This figure, of course, was suggested by the ancient courts of justice, where the culprit was arraigned by the representatives of the state and his release was assured only when his innocence could be proved or palliating circum stance adduced. Here, as in each of these parallel figures, the domi nating idea is that deUverance or salvation is attained as the result of the divine love expressed in the work and death of Jesus. A third figure was that of forgiveness. Here the sinner was thought of as a debtor to whom God had granted f uU forgiveness, because of divine love which Jesus supremely exemplified and proclaimed. The fourth parallel figure was that of reconcUiation. It implied that the sinner by his acts had put himself in an attitude of enmity toward God. Jesus is again the one who reconcUes him to his divine Father. It is significant that in each of these figures, by which Paul de scribes the salvation of the individual, the work of an intermediary between God and man is impUed, if not absolutely required. It em phasizes the fundamental difference between Paul's own relation to God and that of Jesus. Jesus did not desire nor would he have toler ated any intermediary between himself and God. Paul and the great majority of his feUow Christians in the past, as in the present, crave such an interpreter of God. In supplying this practically universal need, Paul and the early apostles made their supreme contribution to Chris tianity, for they proclaimed Jesus to be the great interpreter of God to man. Christ in man and man in Christ made personal feUowship with God possible and easy. Here Paul unconsciously joins hands with the Greek mystics. His doctrine of Christ in him and he in Christ was not a mere figure of speech nor a dogma; it was a deep, transforming, spiritual experience which freed him from his conscious ness of sin and gave him instead a consciousness of fellowship with God. Sometimes Paul attributed this mystic experience to the pres ence of Christ, sometimes to the Spirit of Christ, and sometimes to the Spirit of God within him. In Romans 89_u he uses these three synonyms together: "But you are not in the flesh but in the spirit, if 189 PAUL'S INTERPRETATION OF JESUS' WORK the Spirit of God dweUs in you. Any one who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him; but if Christ is within you, though the body is dead as a result of sin, the spirit is living as a result of righteous ness. And if the Spirit of him who raised up Jesus from the dead dweUs within you, then he who raised Christ Jesus from the dead wiU also make your immortal bodies Uve because his Spirit is dwelUng within you." Like certain of the early writers in Acts, Paul evidently uses the terms "Spirit of Jesus," "Holy Spirit," and "Spirit of God" interchangeably. The ultimate basis of his mysticism is the contrast between a life governed by the fleshly passions and a life governed by the higher spiritual emotions which find their source and inspiration in God. It is a life of feUowship and loyal co-operation with God made possible as the individual is touched by the personahty and in spired by the teachings of Jesus. It is this spiritual experience which Paul describes by his favorite term "faith in Christ." It is not mere subscription to articles of belief, but it is the effect of the Spirit of Christ at work in the heart of the individual. It is the spirit of love which Jesus proclaimed and exemplified, which transforms men into his likeness and binds them together in loyal, devoted, self-sacrificing service of the great brotherhood which he founded. When this Spirit is at work in the heart of a man his past sins and his evil habits no longer have power over him; he is conscious of God's forgiveness, and is invincible against the pains and perils of life, for he is " more than a conqueror through him who loved us." No power in heaven or earth can separate him " from God's love in Jesus Christ our Lord." It is thus that men are saved through faith in Christ. Well is this trans forming spiritual process described in the primitive Christian prayer preserved in the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles: "We thank thee, our Father, for the life and the knowledge which thou hast made known to us through Jesus thy Servant." §CLXI. PAUL'S SOCIAL TEACHINGS Theme: I beseech you, therefore, brothers, on account of the new mercies of God, dedicate your bodies as a Uving sacrifice, gin- holy and acceptable to God, for this is your reasonable of self- service. And do not be moulded in conformity to this world, Sg.f " but be transformed through the complete renewal of your jRom. mind, so that you may be able to make out what is the wtil of God, even what is good and acceptable and perfect. 190 .EACH TO DO HIS TASK By virtue of the divine authority granted to me, I charge Bach every one of you not to think of himseh more than he ought f°ifh- to think; but so to think that he wtil attain a sane estimate fgjiy of himseh according to the degree of faith which God hath task apportioned to each. For just as in our one body we have ^cn many members, and all the members do not have the same gefe functions, so we, though many, are one body in Christ and (?¦*) we are each members one with another. We have different gifts according to the grace that is given us ; if it is prophecy let us use it in proportion to our faith; if practical service, in practical service ; the teacher must do the same in teach ing; he who exhorts in his exhortation; he who gives must do it liberally; he who is an authority must be in earnest; he who does acts of mercy must do them cheerfuUy. Let love be without hypocrisy; abhor what is evU, cleave in Ms to what is good. In your love for your brothers feel true reia? affection for one another. In matters of honor yield to one tj0^ another. Be not lacking in zeal; keep aUve the sphitual feiiow glow; serve the Lord; rejoice in your hope; be steadfast in c^r- trouble, persistent in prayer; contribute to the needs of Lord. Rather, if your enemy is hungry feed him, if he is thirsty give him drink; for in so doing you will heap coals of fire on his head. Be not conquered by evil, but conquer evti by doing good. Every individual must obey those who rule over him, for The there is no authority apart from God; the existing author- §££*" ities have been constituted by God. Therefore, whoever %?$t0 resists authority is resisting the order estabUshed by God, author- and they who oppose wtil bring judgment on themselves, (ft,.,) For rulers are no terror to right-doers but to wrong-doers. 191 PAUL'S SOCIAL TEACHINGS You wish, do you not, to have no fear of authority? Then do what is right and you wtil be commended by it, for a ruler is the servant of God for your good. But if you do wrong, you have cause to fear, for he does not bear the sword for nothing, for he is God's servant to inflict divine punishment upon evU-doers. It is necessary, therefore, that we should obey, not only to avoid divine vengeance, but also for conscience' sake. For this same reason we pay taxes, for tax coUectors are God's servants, devoting theh energies to this very thing. Render to all theh dues, tribute to whom tribute is due, taxes to whom taxes, respect to whom respect, and honor to whom honor is due. To his Owe no man anything, except to love one another, for he men™ who loves his fellow man has fulfilled the law. For the (8~10) commands, Thou shalt not commit adultery, thou shalt not ktil, thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not covet, these and aU other commands are summed up in this one word, Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. Love does no wrong to a neighbor; therefore love is the fulfillment of the law. obiiga- You also know what this crisis means: that it is high ofthe time to arouse ourselves from sleep, for salvation is nearer present ^0 us now fa^ when we first believed. The night is far (u.m) advanced, the day is near. Let us, therefore, lay aside the deeds of darkness and put on the armour of tight. Let us behave ourselves becomingly, as in the Ught of day without revelry or drunkenness, without lust or sensuality, without quarrelling or jealousy. Rather let us put on the character of the Lord Jesus Christ and make no provision for gratify ing the cravings of the flesh. Toiera- Receive a man of weak faith, but not to pass judgment toward upon his scruples. One man has faith enough to eat all things; whtie the man of weak faith eats only vegetables. Let not the one who eats look down upon the one who does not eat, nor let the man who does not eat condemn bim who eats aU things, for God hath received him. Who are you that you should criticize the servant of another? Whether he stands or faUs concerns only his own Master, and stand he wtil for the Master hath power to make him stand. One man rates one day above another, whtie an other man rates aU days alike. Let every man be fuUy 192 others (14i-«) TOLERATION OF OTHERS' CONVICTIONS convinced in his own mind. He who rates highly a cer tain day does it for the Lord. The eater also eats to the Lord, for he gives thanks to God; and he who refrains from eating, refrains for the Lord's sake and he also gives thanks to God. For none of us Uves for. himseh and none of us dies for himseh; for if we Uve, we Uve for the Lord, and if we die, we die for the Lord. Thus whether we live or whether we die, we are the Lord's. It was for this that Christ died and Uves again in order that he might be the Lord both of the dead and of the Uving. And why do you criticize your brother? Or you, why do you look down upon your brother? All of us wtil have to stand before God's tribunal, for it is written: As I Uve, saith the Lord, Every knee shall bend before me, And every tongue shall make confession to God. Every one of us, therefore, wtil have to give an account of himseh to God. Therefore, let us no longer criticize one another. Rather con- make this decision, never to put any stumbling block or «onra* hindrance in your brother's way. I know and am convinced 'X™!" in Christ that nothing is in itseh unclean, except that it is con-r s unclean to the man who considers it unclean, li your l^^ brother is being troubled because of food that you eat, then scra- you are no longer hving in accordance with the law of love. ?»^») Do not by the food that you eat ruin that man for whom Christ died. Therefore let not what is good for you become a cause of reproach, for the Kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, but of righteousness, peace, and joy in the Holy Spirit. He who serves Christ in this way is acceptable to God and esteemed by men. We who are strong ought to bear the infirmities of the oblige weak, and not to please ourselves. Each of us should toward please his neighbor in order to do him good by building *J«^ bim up. And, this is our duty, for Christ did not please us*-*) himself, but, as it is written, The reproaches of those who reproached thee feU on me. For what was written of old was written for our instruction, that through our stead fastness and the encouragement of the scriptures, we ought 193 (16b-21) PAUL'S SOCIAL TEACHINGS have hope. May the God who inspires steadfastness and encouragement grant to you that you may think in such harmony, one with another, after the example of Christ Jesus, that with one heart and voice you wtil glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. The Therefore, welcome one another, as Christ has welcomed oTboth you, for the glory of God. Christ, I say, became a servant Jewish t0 the chcumcised in order to vindicate God' s truthfulness Gentue in showing how sure are the promises given to our forefathers erst'^) and also that the GentUes might glorify God for his mercy. Even so it is written, For this reason I wtil praise thee among the Gentiles and sing to thy name. The My aim has been to make the Gentiles an offering ac- ftoin ceptable to God and consecrated by the Holy Spirit. There- Paui's fore) j have cause to be proud in Christ Jesus of the work work which I have done for God, for I will not presume to speak of anything except what Christ has accomphshed through me in securing the obedience of the Gentiles, by word and deed, by means of signs and mhacles, and by the power of the Holy Spirit. The fact is that, from Jerusalem around as far as lllyricum, I have proclaimed fuUy the gospel of Christ. My ambition, however, has always been to preach the gospel only where Christ's name had not been men tioned lest I should be building on a foundation laid by another man, but, as it is written, That they might see to whom no report about him had come, That those who had not heard of bim should under stand. I. The Two Sides of Paul's Personality and Teaching. Paul's breadth and greatness are attested by the fact that throughout the ages the most diverse types of mind have found in him their supreme inspiration. Ignatius, Luther, and Calvin are only a few of his many devoted, spiritual disciples. For eighteen centuries each generation has taken from Paul that which most appealed to its interests and needs and left the rest of his teachings almost untouched. A theo logical age found in Paul's writings the materials from which it recon structed a complete metaphysical system. Now, in the present strongly 194 THE TWO SIDES OF PAUL social age, Paul promises stiU to hold his place as a moulder of Chris tian thought. The explanation of this marvel is Paul himself. At heart he was a mystic, but, unlike most mystics, he was intensely prac tical. This fact alone saved his theology from becoming mere vague mysticism or cold philosophy. His head was often in the clouds, but his feet were always planted squarely on earth. Faith meant every thing to him, and yet in many of his writings he asserted in most practical terms that "faith without works is dead." This unique combination of mysticism and the strongly ethical and social interpre tation of reUgion is undoubtedly the explanation of his continuous leadership. Men to-day may reject many of his theoretical doctrines, but they cannot escape the charm and inspiration of his practical ethics. This rare combination of the mystic and social teacher is due to Paul's personality and training. His peculiar type of mind and his unique psychological experiences made him a mystic. The apocalyptic tendencies of contemporary Pharisaism undoubtedly in tensified this tendency. On the other hand, his early study of the Jewish law forever fixed in his mind the practical, social concept of reUgion. This precipitate remained long after he had rejected the ceremonial side of the law. This tendency was strengthened by his study of the ethical prophets and by his knowledge of the practical problems that were constantly arising in the Uves of the Christians who looked to him for pastoral guidance. II. Paul's Reassertion of Jesus' Social Teachings. The great force, however, which made Paul a strong social teacher was his familiarity with Jesus' social teachings. Paul was intensely interested in his own theories about Jesus; but it was in the field of practical social ethics that the great apostle stands closest to his Master. That this should be true was natural, for the heart of Jesus' teachings was ethical and social. Evidently Paul had a more extensive and intimate knowledge of these teachings than is generaUy recognized. His oppor tunities for gaining this knowledge were many, for he came into intimate and repeated contact with the disciples of Jesus while the first im pression of their Master's work and teachings were stfll upon them. Evidently Paul also had in certain respects a more extensive acquain tance with certain of Jesus' teachings than is reflected in our gospel records. This fact is obscured, however, by Paul's peculiar method of quoting. Even his direct citations from the Old Testament are rarely reproduced with absolute accuracy. It was more natural for him to paraphrase and interpret than to quote verbatim. Ordinarily he did 195 PAUL'S SOCIAL TEACHINGS not believe it necessary to state that he was reproducing Jesus' teach ings, for he assumed that practically aU that he proclaimed was based on those teachings. Also he felt the Uving spirit of Jesus working in his mind and prompting his every word. It was only when he was in doubt as to whether or not he was reproducing his Master's teachings, as in I Corinthians 7, that he plainly states this fact. Hence, there are good grounds for beUeving that in the field of social ethics Paul is simply interpreting Jesus' teachings and that he has thus preserved certain elements not found in our four gospels. This conclusion is strongly confirmed by a careful examination of Romans 12 and 13, where in a majority of the cases the underlying principle can be di rectly traced to the lips of Jesus. III. Paul's Restatement of Jesus' Social Ideal. Paul, like Jesus, began not with organized society but with the individual, and sought to develop socially minded citizens as the foundation for an ideal social order. Like his Master, he dealt primarUy not with external acts, but with inner motives. He recognized that the individual must first be sociaUy redeemed, transformed, and consecrated to the service of God and society. His thoughts and character must be moulded, not only by circumstances and social conventions, but above all by loyalty to the wiU of God and to the interests of the Christian commu nity. After he has made this complete self-sacrifice to the service of God and his Kingdom, it is easy for each man to find his own individual task in the church and in society and to perform it efficiently. In Paul's mind the perfect social order is the "one body in Christ," of which all his faithful followers are members. It is unimportant that individual talents differ; the one essential is that each use his own for the largest profit of the community. Here, as in I Corinthians and Ephesians, he buUt on the foundations laid by Jesus in his parables regarding the Kingdom of God; but the details are determined by Paul's own personal experience. The Christian communities which he had founded had given him a vision of the perfect community, bound to gether by the spirit and principles of Christ. In his vision he saw this ideal community growing and extending, even as the Christian church was then rapidly extending, until it included all mankind. Paul, in his loyal service to the local communities, which were the pro totype of the aU-embracing community of the saints to be estab Ushed in the future, had himself attained personal salvation, liberty, and fulness of life. Therefore he pointed out to his fellow Christians the same sure and satisfying way of salvation and life. He declared 196 HIS RESTATEMENT OF JESUS' SOCIAL IDEAL by implication that, instead of losing their life, they also could find it through loyalty to the ideal of the perfect community and in work ing for its establishment. In its glories each individual would attain the complete expression of his own highest aspirations; in its fellow ship the full satisfaction of his social craving; in its service the development of his noblest gifts. This community of the socially re deemed, which Paul called the "Body of Christ," is not a mere mys tical abstraction but a perfectly practical social ideal. In Paul's day each local Christian community gave to the individual Christian the field and the definite objective needed to develop his loyalty to the ideal community. Here, as always, Paul makes a complete and natural synthesis of the ideal and the practical. In so doing he has presented a working social programme as appUcable to the needs of society to-day and in the future as it was in the first Christian cen tury. IV. The Christian's Responsibility as a Member of Society. Jesus simply presented social principles; but Paul in his fervent zeal to develop efficient loyalty to the ideal community (which occupied the central place in his vision of the future) lays down many definite laws and commands. He also sets forth his specific social teachings in systematic order and in a most condensed yet forceful form. In Romans 129"16 he defines the Christian's responsibilities to the mem bers of the Christian community. Verse 14 clearly belongs with the next section P7"21), which describes the Christian's obligations to those outside the community. In 131"7 he discusses the Christian's obU- gations to civil authorities. In verses 8"10 he stresses the underlying and aU-comprehending principle of love. Love is indeed the golden strand that runs through aU of Paul's social teachings. He begins with the command, "Let love be without hypocrisy," and ends with the quotation, "Love is the fulfillment of the law." His social teach ings as a whole are simply a practical, detailed appUcation of the Golden Rule to the problems of the individual in his relation to, society. Jesus' beatitude, "Happy are the peacemakers," becomes on the lips of Paul a definite command: "Think in harmony one with another." "Happy are the humble" and "Happy are the poor in spirit" are also transformed into the definite commands: "Strive not for the high things but associate with the humble" and "Do not be self-con ceited." The Master's command, "Love your enemies," on the lips of Paul becomes, "Bless those who persecute you, bless and curse them not." Paul also concludes his recapitulation of the Christian's 197 PAUL'S SOCIAL TEACHINGS responsibilities with the powerful, positive command: "Be not con quered by evU, but conquer evU by doing good," which is a splendid summary of the principles which underlie both Jesus' social teachings and method. Throughout Paul's discussion of the Christian's obligations to or ganized society we recognize the influence of Jesus' broad principle: "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's and to God the things that are God's." In the concluding sentence Paul quotes almost ver batim the words of his Master, expanding them freely, however : "Render to aU their dues, tribute to whom tribute is due, taxes to whom taxes, respect to whom respect and honor to whom honor is due." In his interpretation of Jesus' principle Paul shows the influence of his Ro man citizenship, of his cosmopolitan training, and of his practical statesmanship. His assertion of the divine authority of rulers is in striking contrast with Jesus' rather contemptuous estimate of the men who play the tyrant over their subjects. The context impUes that Paul had in mind simply those rulers who proved by their acts that they were "servants of God." His aim is evidently to deUver the Christians from conflict with the pagan authorities, but the working principles which he lays down are intensely practical through all ages. Nowhere can one find in such condensed form a more exact statement of a theory of government, of its obligations to the individual citizen, and of the duties of a citizen to the state. V. The Christian's Duties of Toleration and Consideration for Others. It has been asserted that Paul's "outlook is almost devoid of social elements" and that the hope of the speedy second coming of Jesus destroyed his interest in society. Carried to its logical conclusion, this result would seem to a superficial reader in evitable; but exactly the opposite effect is discernible. Instead of encouraging his converts to sit with idle hands awaiting the great consummation, which he, as an heir to the Jewish apocalyptic hopes, regarded as imminent, Paul encouraged them to discharge all their social obligations with the greatest care and consideration. His be Uef that the "night is far advanced and that the day is near" only intensified his social consciousness. The explanation is that he re garded the Christian church already established and rapidly expand ing as the foundation of the new world-wide community that was to be perfected at the second coming of Jesus. Paul's breadth is also revealed in the principles which he laid down regarding toleration toward others. The man of weak faith, whom he 198 TOLERATION AND CONSIDERATION FOR OTHERS had in mind, was the one limited by the conventional conceptions of reUgion. It was the type of man who regarded the observation of certain ritualistic forms and of days of feasting or fasting as abso lutely essential. Evidently Paul himself did not share these beliefs; but he contended as earnestly for the liberty of personal judgment for the man with whom he did not agree as he did for his own. Each man, as he convincingly argues, is simply responsible to God. Here again it seems probable that Paul is standing squarely on principles proclaimed by Jesus and implied, though not recorded, in our gospels. It was this principle which determined the attitude of Jesus, as well as Paul, toward the ceremonial institutions of Judaism. Underlying Paul's command not to criticise nor look down upon a brother Christian one sees clearly Jesus' teaching: "Judge not that you be not judged." Also his command not to put a stumbling-block or hinderance in a brother's way is but Paul's free paraphrase of Jesus' words: "Woe to you who cause any of these little ones to stumble." With rare effec tiveness and feUcity Paul lays down the comprehensive Christian prin ciple that the larger responsibflity to show toleration and considera tion to the brother of more limited vision rests upon the man of broader faith and outlook. He is the one who should be supremely governed by the law of love. The context also implies that the significant saying: The Kingdom of God is not a matter of eating and drinking, But of righteousness, peace, and joy, came directly from the Ups of Jesus. VI. The Christian's Obligation to Men of All Races. In conclusion Paul suggests the Christian's larger missionary obligations to the Gentile world. He presents this responsibility, not in the form of a direct command, but first by pointing out the fact that Jesus' work was done that Gentiles as well as Jews "might glorify God for his mercy." He then adds that his own primary aim as an apostle has been to bring the GentUes into harmony with God's purpose. He declares that his great ambition has been to preach the Gospel where before Christ's name had not been mentioned. Paul wisely leaves to each individual Christian the appUcation of the principle so nobly illustrated by his own example and by that of his Master. Thus, Paul's teachings regarding the social responsibilities of each Christian may be briefly summarized under six heads: (1) To give him self completely to tiie service df his divine Master, (2) To use each 199 PAUL'S SOCIAL TEACHINGS and aU of his talents in behalf of "the body of Christ." (3) To show to his fellow citizens in this ideal commonwealth justice, love, consider ation, and hospitality. (4) To regard all men of every shade of faith in the spirit of love and forgiveness and to serve them as opportunity offers. (5) To pay to the state its dues and to respect and obey its rulers. (6) To extend to the Gentiles everywhere the hand of Chris tian fellowship, to proclaim to them the Gospel of the Master, and by these means to attract them to the ranks of those who are loyaUy working for that perfect community which is ultimately to include aU mankind. Thus, nobly and practically, in the concrete terms of love and loyalty and service, Paul interpreted Jesus' great social command to "seek first the Kingdom of God." §CLXH. PAUL'S LAST JOURNEY TO JERUSALEM Paul's When we had torn ourselves away from the presbyters of voyage Ephesus and had set sail, we ran in a straight course to ptoie- cos; on the next day to Rhodes, and from there to Patera. (Acts Finding a ship bound for Phoenicia, we embarked and set 3|M) saU. After sighting Cyprus and leaving it on our left, we sailed for Syria and landed at Tyre, for there the ship was to unload her cargo. After we had searched out the dis ciples, we remained there seven days. Certain of these disciples under the inspiration of the Spirit kept telling Paul not to set foot in Jerusalem; but when our time was up, we set out and went our way, escorted until we were out of the city by all of them, including women and children. Then kneeling on the beach we prayed and said good-bye to one another. While we went on board the ship, they re turned home. SaiUng from Tyre to Ptolemais, we com pleted our voyage. Then after we had saluted the brothers, we spent one day with them. ms ex- Setting out the next morning, we came to Caesarea and ISi" at entered the house of PhUip, the evangeUst, who was one of Cffisa- the seven, and stayed with him. Now he had four un- (8-n) married daughters who prophesied. WhUe we remained there many days a certain prophet by the name of Agabus came down from Judea. Coming to us, he took Paul's girdle and bound his own feet and hands, saying, Thus saith the Holy Spirit, ' So shaU the Jews bind the owner of 200 PAUL'S EXPERIENCE AT C2ESAREA this girdle and hand him over to the Gentiles.' When we heard these words, we and those who dwelt at Caesarea be sought Paul not to go up to Jerusalem; but Paul repUed, What do you mean by weeping and breaking my heart? For I am ready not only to be bound but to die in Jerusalem for the sake of the Lord Jesus. When he would not be persuaded, we ceased speaking, saying, May the Lord's wtil be done. After some days, we packed up our baggage and set out His for Jerusalem. And certain of the disciples from Caesarea ^nval accompanied us, conducting us to the house of a certain J^> Mnason, a native of Cyprus, one of the early disciples with (»-?™ whom we were to lodge. When we arrived at Jerusalem the brothers received us gladly. On the next day Paul went with us to James. AU the Kecep- presbyters were present and, after saluting them, Paul told j^?* in detail all that God had done through his ministry among saiem the Gentiles; and when they heard it they glorified God. They also said to him, Brother, you see how many tens of The thousands there are among the Jews who beUeve and that E^i" aU of them zealously uphold the law. Now they have been ^^ne told that you teach all Jews who Uve among the Gentiles (?<*-¦*) to break away from Moses and that you tell them not to circumcise theh chUdren and not to follow the old customs. What now is to be done ? They are sure to hear that you have arrived, therefore do what we say. We have four men here who have taken a vow upon themselves. As sociate with them, purify yourself with them, and pay theh expenses that they may shave theh heads and all wtil know that there is no foundation for the stories about you but that you are orthodox and that you yourseh keep the law. As for the Gentile beUevers, we have communicated to them our decision that they must abstain from those things which have been offered to idols, from blood, from the flesh of animals which have been strangled and from sexual vice. Then Paul associated himseh with the men the next day, was purified along with them, and went into the temple, announcing when the days of purification would be completed, that is, when sacrifice could be offered for each of them. 201 PAUL'S LAST JOURNEY TO JERUSALEM Paul's But when the seven days were almost over, certain Jews bytEif from the province of Asia, seeing Paul in the temple, stirred ™°fc up all the crowd and laid hands on him, shouting, Men of Israel, help ! This is the man who teaches aU men every where against the Jewish people and the law and this place. And besides he has even brought Greeks into the temple and desecrated this holy place. (For they had previously seen Trophimus, the Ephesian, with him in the city whom they supposed Paul had taken into the temple.) The whole city was aroused and the people rushed to gether and seized Paul and dragged him outside the temple, and immediately the gates were closed. His But while the people were seeking to ktil Paul, word erance came to the commander of the garrison that ati Jerusalem Roman was "* COIhusion. Immediately taking some soldiers and com- officers, he rushed down to them. But when they saw the pHJf™ commander and the soldiers they ceased beating Paul. 22»)' Then the commander drew near and arrested him and ordered him to be bound with two chains. And he in quired, Who is he and what has he done ? Some of the crowd shouted one thing, some another; but when he could not learn the exact truth on account of the uproar, he ordered Paul to be led into the barracks. But when Paul was at the steps, he had to be carried by the soldiers on account of the violence of the crowd, for the whole multi tude of the people followed shouting, Away with bim » Just as Paul was about to be led into the barracks, he said to the commander, May I say something to you ? The com mander repUed, Do you know Greek ? Then you are not the Egyptian who in former days stirred up the four thou sand Assassins and led them out into the desert? Paul repUed, I am a Jew, a native of Tarsus of Cilicia, a citizen of no insignificant city. I beg you, permit me to speak to the people. And as the commander gave permission, Paul stood on the steps and motioned with his hands to the people; and when there was perfect silence he addressed them in Hebrew, telling them of his vision on the way to Damascus and how the Lord said to him, Go, for I send you afar to the Gentiles. Until he had said this the people had Ustened to Paul, 202 PAUL'S SCOURGING but now they raised a great outcry saying, Away with such scourg- a feUow from the earth, for he is not fit to Uve! They |Slfn- shouted and threw theh clothes into the ah and flung dust stjga- about until the commander ordered Paul to be led into the o'rTue barracks and to be examined under the lash in order to "^L ascertain the reason why the people had shouted at him. "> But when they had tied him up with straps, Paul said to the officer who was standing by, Are you permitted to scourge a Roman citizen, and that without trial? When the officer heard this he went to report the matter to the commander, saying, What is this you are about to do ? For this man is a Roman citizen. Then the commander went to him and said, Tell me, are you a Roman citizen ? And he answered, Yes. Then the commander repUed, I paid a large sum for this citizenship. But I was born a Roman citizen, said Paul. Then the men who were about to ex amine him immediately left him. The commander also was alarmed when he learned that Paul was a Roman citizen and that he had bound him. The next day the commander, wishing to know exactly Paul's what charge was brought against Paul by the Jews, unbound before6 bim and ordered the high priests and all the Sanhedrin to j*e assemble. Then bringing Paul down, he made him stand hedrin before them. Whereupon, Paul looking straight at the ¥$°~ Sanhedrin, said, Brothers, I have Uved before God with a perfectly good conscience up to this day. Then the high priest Ananias ordered those who were standing near Paul to strike him on the mouth. Paul said to him, You white washed wall, God wtil strike you ! Do you sit there to judge me according to the law while you yourself break the law by ordering me to be struck ? But those who were stand ing by said, Would you rati at God's high priest? Paul said, Brothers, I did not know that he was a high priest (for it is written, ' Thou shalt not speak evU of a ruler of thy people '). Then Paul, knowing that part of the Sanhedrin con sisted of Sadducees and the other part of Pharisees, shouted to them, Brothers, I am a Pharisee, the son of Pharisees. For the hope of the resurrection of the dead I am on trial ! When he said this, there was a quarrel between the Phari- 203 (.-10) PAUL'S LAST JOURNEY TO JERUSALEM The sees and the Sadducees, and the assembly was divided. bav&i For while the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection !>*> nor angel nor spirit, the Pharisees acknowledge all these ducees things; hence there was a great uproar. And some of %££te the scribes, who belonged to the party of the Pharisees, arose and contended, We find no harm in this man. What if some sphit or angel has spoken to him? When the quarrel became so violent that the commander feared that Paul would be torn in pieces by them, he ordered the troops to go down and take him from theh midst by force and bring him into the barracks. Paul's On tiie foUowing night the Lord stood by Paul and said, (Sf011 Be of good courage, for as you have borne witness to me at Jerusalem so you must bear witness also at Rome. The Now when dayUght came, the Jews formed a conspiracy gnJhiSi aud solemnly swore not to eat or drink until they had killed (im) Paul. Those who bound themselves by this oath were more than forty in all. Going to the high priests and elders they said, We have bound ourselves by a solemn oath not to taste anything until we have killed Paul. Now you, together with the Sanhedrin, must make it appear to the commander that you wish him to bring Paul down to you because you wish to investigate more minutely the charges brought against him. We will be ready to kill him before he comes near this place. The But Paul's nephew heard of the treacherous ambush and closure gained admission to the barracks and informed Paul. Then pio?16 -Pau* caUed one of the officers and said, Take this young man Ju-m.) to the commander for he has some information to give him. Accordingly the officer took and brought him to the com mander and said, Paul the prisoner called me and asked me if I would bring this young man to you for he has something to say to you. Then the commander took him aside by the hand and inquired of him in private, What is the informa tion you have to give me ? He said, The Jews have agreed to ask you to bring Paul to-morrow down to the Sanhedrin for the avowed purpose of examining his case in detail. Now do not be persuaded by them, for more than forty of them are lying in wait for him. Then the commander sent away the young man, enjoin- 204 PAUL AT CESAREA ing him to ' teU no one that you informed me of these things.' Paul He then summoned two of the officers and said, Make g^*.0 ready two hundred infantry, seventy horsemen, and two «» hundred spearmen by nine o'clock to-night to march as far as Caesarea. Provide horses also to mount Paul so as to bring him safely to Felix the governor. He also wrote a letter to Felix. The soldiers, therefore, according to theh instructions, Arrival took Paul and brought him by night to Antipatris. On the ciesa- next day the infantry returned to the barracks, leaving the "» cavalry to go on with him. When they reached Caesarea, they deUvered the letter to the governor and also brought Paul to him. When he had read the letter, Felix asked from what province he was, and learning that it was Cilicia he said, I wtil hear all about your case whenever your ac cusers arrive. And he gave orders that Paul be kept in the pretorium of Herod. I. The Record of Paul's Journey to Jerusalem and Rome. When Paul set out on his final journey to Jerusalem, the intermittent stream of narrative in Acts suddenly broadens, giving us a detaUed picture of Paul's pubUc activity. FuUy one-fourth of the book of Acts is devoted to these journeys which finally led him to Rome. Only regarding Paul's two years' imprisonment at Caesarea the narra tive suddenly becomes sUent. Two reasons probably explain this striking Uterary phenomenon. With the exception of the two years at Caesarea, Luke was evidently drawing from his own personal experi ence and observation. Throughout most of this narrative he speaks in the first person plural. As has already been noted, the evidence is practically conclusive that Luke himself is the author of this journal of travel and that, even where he does not use the first person, he is in close personal touch with the facts. The second reason is because of the nature of the material here presented. Two of Luke's most important contentions are: (1) that practicaUy aU the opposition to Christianity came from the Jews, and (2) that the early attitude of the Roman officials toward Christianity was not only friendly but protective. It is probably under the influence of this motive that Luke has reproduced and expanded the speeches of Paul and the Roman officials and introduced even the supposed text of the letter sent by the Roman governor of Jerusalem to Felix, the procurator of 205 PAUL'S LAST JOURNEY TO JERUSALEM Judea. He also aimed to say as little as possible about the heart burns and bitternesses of the past. Luke's concentration on these definite aims alone explains his sUence regarding the real object of Paul's visit to Jerusalem and the realization of the apostle's great ambition. II. Paul's Reasons for Revisiting Jerusalem. The narrative of Acts indicates clearly that Paul went up to Jerusalem in direct op position to the earnest warnings of his friends. They knew well the bitterness of the opposition which he would meet in that centre of Judaism. The account of the warning of Agabus, who had just come from Judea and was therefore in close touch with conditions there, indicates that the old type of Hebrew prophet stUl survived in the Christian church. For the "Thus saith Jehovah" is substituted the equally impressive phrase "Thus saith the Holy Spirit." The over mastering conviction that incites him to speak is evidently akin in every respect to that which in earner days drew Amos from his flock and impelled him to speak before the assembled multitudes at the great sanctuary in Bethel. The methods whereby Agabus impressed his message upon Paul also recaU the dramatic object-lessons which Ezekiel used to convince his irresolute countrymen. But neither the warnings of the Christian prophets nor Paul's own knowledge of the perils which confronted him at Jerusalem deterred him. What were the reasons which thus impeUed him onward? The first was evi dently his feeling that he must fulfil the parting injunction of the piUar apostles in their last interview at Jerusalem, when they urged him to remember the poor at Jerusalem. He also felt a deep obliga tion to discharge the trust placed in his hands by the Gentile churches and to deliver at Jerusalem in person the funds intrusted to his care. More important stiU, Paul desired in the presence of the mother church to vindicate his work among the GentUes. He plainly declares this purpose in the conclusion of his letter to the Roman Christians: "Pray that I may be delivered from the unbelievers in Judea and also that my mission to Jerusalem may prove acceptable to the saints." Above all, Paul ardently hoped by this visit to establish the unity of the "Body of Christ." This achievement he hoped to make the crown of his Ufe-work. All the influences of his Jewish inheritance led him to crave the approval and fellowship of his Jewish Christian brothers. If he could win these, aU the bitterness of the Judaistic controversies would be but easily forgotten memories, and the Christian church would be in a position to face the Graeco-Roman world with unbroken 206 PAUL'S REASONS FOR REVISITING JERUSALEM front. It was, therefore, as the first great apostle of Christian unity that Paul undertook this perilous adventure. III. Paul's Reception at Jerusalem. The narrative of Acts indicates that Paul's reception by the leaders of the Jerusalem church was on the whole friendly, but it is ominously sUent regarding the way in which they received the contributions of the Gentile churches. They were stiU chiefly concerned about Paul's attitude toward the Jewish law. It is evident that they were unable to rise above their intense Jewish environment. It is probable that already the storm of Jewish persecution was rising, which resulted a few years later in the death of James, the brother of Jesus, and in the scattering of the Jerusalem church. Even the optimistic Luke gives the impression that within the Christian brotherhood Paul met with bitter disap pointment. WhUe the leaders shared with him the joy inspired by his marveUous achievements in GentUe lands, they were unable to shake off their immediate fears. Their chief concern was still about his at titude toward the Jewish law. Was his action, as reported, in avowing pubUcly his personal loyalty to the Jewish law inconsistent with his earlier teachings and practices ? It was certainly consistent with his avowed principle "of becoming like the Jews to win over the Jews and as one of themselves to those under the law." Moreover, his chief contention had been that the Jewish law was not binding on any Christians except as they freely chose to keep it in order not to offend the "weak." Against the action of the Jewish Christians, who con tinued for conscientious reasons to observe the laws of their fathers, he was the last to raise a voice of protest. The impression that he was opposed to the Mosaic law itself was also wrong. In the circum stances he probably felt amply justified, in order to remove false im pressions, in associating with four poor men who had taken a vow and in defraying the expense of the sacrifices demanded by the Jewish ritual. IV. The Jewish Attack. Paul's action probably satisfied the Jewish Christians, but in the end it proved disastrous. His presence in the temple aroused the smouldering antagonism of certain of the visiting Jews from the province of Asia, who had probably come into hostUe contact with Paul during his long and strenuous ministry at Ephesus. The memory that Paid had earlier brought Titus, a Greek Christian, to Jerusalem, may stiU have lingered in the popular mind. If so, it tended to give credence to the charge of the Ephesian Jews that Paul had taken another GentUe Christian, Trophimus of Ephesus (who had journeyed to Jerusalem with Paul) into the sacred temple 207 PAUL'S LAST JOURNEY TO JERUSALEM precincts. According to the Jewish law, confirmed by the tablets set up by Herod about the enclosure which shut in the inner courts of the temple, this was a capital offense. The charge was undoubtedly false, but it was sufficient to inflame the mind of the fanatical mob. The Romans were ordinarily inclined to support the Jewish law, but the Jews in their fury evidently intended to take justice in their own hands and to slay Paul on the charge of impiety. Uprisings of this character, even in the temple courts at this period, were evidently common, and the Roman guards, stationed at the tower of Antonia on the northwestern side of the temple area, were ever on the alert to put down an uprising. Their timely interference alone saved Paul's life. As ever in face of danger, he was cool and alert. It was characteristic of Paul to face the mob and to improve the dramatic opportunity thus offered to preach the faith for which he was ready to die. The variations in the account of his conversions indicate that the detaUs of the speech here attributed to him are not the result of the verbatim report, for which the occasion offered no opportunity, but of Luke's tendency to present vividly and concretely the spirit and thought of the characters who figure in his narrative. Even in the hands of the Roman soldiers, Paul again proved himself master of the situation. Emperors like Augustus and Tiberius, keenly interested in the welfare of the provinces, had taught the Roman provincial officials to beware lest they misuse their power. Paul's assertions that he was a Roman citizen not only saved him from scourging but also insured him a fair hearing. Before the Roman official could take action, Paul, because of the nature of the charge brought against him, must be tried and con demned by the supreme Jewish court, the Sanhedrin. According to Luke's account, Paul, knowing well the constitution of this unique assembly, precipitated a dispute among its members which again brought in the Roman troops. The futUity of the charge brought against Paul was evidently recognized by his bitterest foes. Baffled in their attempt to put an end to him at the hands of the mob, they formed a conspiracy to km him secretiy. Fortunately for Paul, he had Jewish kinsmen at Jerusalem, who revealed this plot to him. His abflity and Roman citizenship had evidently made a deep impression upon the Roman commander, so that almost as a royal prisoner Paul was sent to Felix, the governor of Judea, whose official residence was at Caesarea. V. The Results of Paul's Visit to Jerusalem. Unfortunately, the detaUs in Luke's account of Paul's visit to Jerusalem have ob scured the main issue. Was his mission successful? Did the Jeru- 208 THE RESULTS OF PAUL'S VISIT salem church accept the contributions of the Gentile Christians and in so doing cement the bond between the two branches of the Chris tian church? Whatever be the answer, the significant fact is estab Ushed that Paul, who most nobly interpreted the spirit of Jesus, was such an ardent advocate of Christian unity that he was quite ready, if necessary, to die for this cause. The facts themselves are fugitive. Luke's narrative leaves us to infer that Paul's mission to Jerusalem was successful. Possibly there were detaUs which Luke deemed best to omit. Early Christian tradition asserts that Luke himself was the one whom Paul describes in II Cormthians 818"21 as "the brother who is praised by aU the churches because of his services for the Gospel, and not only so, but who has been appointed by the churches to travel with us in charge of this contribution which we are admin istering for the glory of the Lord. His appointment was also in ac cord with our desire, for we want to take precaution lest any one should find fault with us regarding the administration of this charity, for we aim to do those things which are honorable, not only in the sight of God, but also in the sight of men." That Luke accompanied Paul to Jerusalem is clear. He appears also to have returned to Syria after the apostle's long imprisonment, for he was present to accompany him on his journey to Rome. It is strange that Luke says nothing in Acts concerning the realization of Paul's ardent hope that "his mission to Jerusalem might prove acceptable to the saints." Luke's account leaves us to infer that it was acceptable and that Paul's pubUc proof of his personal regard for the Jewish law was one of the conditions under which they accepted it. If so, further light is thrown upon his reasons for submitting to what must to many of his friends have been regarded as a compromise. Possibly at the suggestion of the Jeru salem apostles part of the contributions from the GentUe churches was used to defray the expenses of the four Jewish Christians, who were thus enabled to fulfil their vows. Certainly Paul's later letters, and especiaUy PhiUppians and Ephesians, resound with thanksgiving because the unity of the church of Christ had been established and the barriers, which had kept Gentile and Jew apart, had been removed. To the GentUes of Asia Minor he writes (Eph. 219"21) : "You are no longer strangers and foreigners, you share the membership of the saints, you belong to God's own household, you are a building which rests on the apostles and prophets as its foundation, with Jesus Christ as the corner-stone. In him the whole structure is welded together and rises into a sacred temple in the Lord." 209 §CLXm. THE AMBASSADOR IN BONDS Pauls Five days after Paul arrived at Caesarea the high priest, ^ch. Ananias, came down with some elders and an orator called ™«?* TertuUus. They laid the case against Paul before the 24'V governor. After Paul had been summoned, TertuUus be gan to accuse him, saying, Inasmuch as it is owing to you, most exceUent Felix, that we enjoy perfect peace and as it is through your wise provision that evtis are corrected in this nation in every instance and in every place, we accept these with profound gratitude. But in order that I may not detain you too long, I beg you in your forbearance to hear a brief statement from us. For we have found this man Paul a pest and a disturber of the peace among aU the Jews throughout the world and a ringleader of the Nazarene sect. He even tried to desecrate the temple, but we ar rested him. By examining him yourself you wtil be able to find out about all these charges which we allege against him. The Jews also joined in the attack, declaring that these things were so. Paul's Then at a signal from the governor, Paul made his reply: g^T Knowing that you have administered justice in this nation tionof for many years, I willingly make my defense, because, as cence you are able to ascertain, it is not more than twelve days (10!1) since I went up to worship at Jerusalem. They neither found me arguing with any one in the temple nor stirring up a crowd either in the synagogues or in the city. They cannot prove the charges which they are now bringing against me. But this I confess to you that in the way, which they call a sect, I worship the God of our fathers, and I beUeve aU that is written in the law and the prophets and I hold the same hope in God as they themselves enter tain, that there is to be a resurrection of the just and the unjust. Therefore, I too am under obligation at aU times to have a clear conscience before God and man. After several years I came up to bring alms and sacrifices for my nation. They found me while doing this in the temple, ceremoniaUy pure and mixed up in no mob nor riot; but there were certain Jews from Asia who ought to be here 210 PAUL'S PROTESTATION OF INNOCENCE before you to present whatever charge they may have against me. Or let those men there teU what fault they found in me when I stood before the Sanhedrin, unless it be that single sentence which I uttered when I shouted as I stood among them, ' It is for the resurrection of the dead that I am being tried to-day before you.' But Felix, being accurately informed regarding the way, Felix's adjourned theh case, saying to them, When Lysias the com- r||ard" mander comes down, I wtil decide your case. He also gave g8 orders to the officer to hold him in custody and to aUow him (», ») some Uberty and not to prevent his own friends from min istering to him. Some days later, Felix came with DrusUla his wife, who helix's was a Jewess, and sent for Paul and heard bim speak re- of ay garding faith in Christ Jesus. But when he argued about £j)^'s justice, self-control, and future judgment, Felix became ("-") alarmed and repUed, You may go for the present and when I find a convenient time I wtil send for you, though he hoped at the same time that Paul would give him money. For this reason he sent for bim frequently and conversed with him. But when two full years had passed, Felix was suc ceeded by Porcius Festus. And as Felix wished to in gratiate himseh with the Jews, he left Paul in custody. Now three days after Festus entered the province he The went up from Caesarea to Jerusalem. Then the high "fJt priests and the leading Jews brought a charge against Paul fe£f and begged Festus as a favor to send and have him brought (25'-»«) to Jerusalem, for they were planning an ambush to kill him on the way. But Festus repUed that Paul was in custody in Caesarea and that he himseh was about to go there in a short time. Therefore, he said, let those of you who are able go down with me and charge the man with whatever crime he has committed. After staying eight or ten days in Jerusalem he went down to Caesarea. The next day Festus took his seat on the tribunal and Pauls ordered Paul to be brought in. When he arrived, the Jews $b-e)lse who had come down from Jerusalem stood around him and brought many and grave charges against him which they were unable to prove. Paul said in reply, I have committed no offense against the Jewish law or the temple or Caesar. 211 peror (i-i.) THE AMBASSADOR IN BONDS Paul's But Festus, wishing to win favor with the Jews, asked to'the1 Paul, Are you wiUing to go up to Jerusalem and be tried lf;OT there before me regarding these charges? Paul said, I am standing before Caesar's tribunal, where I ought to be tried. I have done no wrong to the Jews, as you also know perfectly weU. If, however, I have done wrong and have done anything worthy of death I do not object to dy ing. But if these men have brought no real charges against me, then no one has a right to favor them by giving me up to them. I appeal to Caesar! Then after conferring with the councU, Festus answered, You have appealed to Caesar, to Caesar you shaU go. Paul After some days had passed, King Agrippa and Bernice A^p6- came down to Caesarea to pay theh respects to Festus. ]?£„ And since they were spending many days there, Festus a) laid Paul's case before the king. So on the next day Agrippa and Bernice came with much pomp and entered the audience haU, accompanied by the military com manders and by the chief men of the city. Then at the command of Festus Paul was brought in. Pauls Thereupon, Agrippa said to Paul, You have permission to before6 speak in your own behah. At this, Paul, stretching out A|rip- his hand, began his defense: I consider myself fortunate, C26j-«. King Agrippa, in being able this day to defend myself before *' a) you against all the accusations with which I am charged by the Jews, for you are exceedingly weU informed regarding aU the Jewish customs and questions. Therefore, I beg of you hear me patiently. AU the Jews know the kind of Ufe I Uved from my youth upwards among my nation and in Jerusalem. . . . Now to this day I have had the help of God and have stood firm, testifying to small and great, never saying a single word beyond what the prophets and Moses said would take place, namely, that the Christ was to suffer and be the first to rise from the dead and proclaim a message of Ught to the Jewish people and to the Gentiles. The When Paul thus made his defense, Festus said in a loud o?p "" voice, Paul, you are stark mad ! Your great learning is Festus driving you insane ! But Paul said, I am not mad, most Agrip- noble Festus, but I am speaking words of truth and sober- ?«.») ness. For the king to whom I can speak freely, knows 212 PAUL'S REPLY TO KING AGRIPPA about these things. Indeed, I cannot but beUeve that no detail has escaped his notice, for this thing was not done in a corner. King Agrippa, do you not beUeve the prophets? I know that you do. But Agrippa said to Paul, In a short time you wtil beUeve that you have made a Christian of me ! Paul repUed, Long or short, I pray to God that not only you but also aU my hearers this day may be such as I am, excepting these chains. Then the king arose with the governor and Bernice and Decia- those who had been sitting with them and withdrew to dis- oftlon cuss the matter with one another. And they said, This Paul's man has done nothing deserving of death or imprison- cence ment. Agrippa also said to Festus, This man might have (°° ""^ been released if he had not appealed to Caesar. Now when it was decided that we were to sail for Italy, ind- they handed over Paul and certain other prisoners to an „f "jfe officer of the imperial regiment named JuUus. Then J£JfMe going on board of a ship of Adramyttium, which was bound to the seaports of the province of Asia, we set sail, having with us Aristarchus, a Macedonian from Thessalonica. On the next day we put in at Sidon, where JuUus treated Paul very kindly and aUowed him to visit his friends and to avati himseh of theh generous care. Putting to sea from there, we sailed under the lee of Cyprus, because the wind was against us. Then, after sailing the whole length of the sea which Ues off Citicia and PamphyUa, we came to Myra in Lycia. There the officer found an Alexandrian ship bound for Italy and put us on board of her. For a number of days we made slow progress and came with great difficulty off Cnidus. Then, as the wind did not al low us to go on, we satied under the lee of Crete, opposite Cape Salome, and coasting along with difficulty we reached a place called Fah Havens, near the city of Lasea. Inasmuch as our voyage had taken considerable time Paul's and the sailing had become dangerous, and the autumn tothe fast was aheady over, Paul warned them saying, Men, I sauora perceive that this voyage will be attended with danger and much loss not only to the cargo and the ship but to our own Uves. The officer, however, let himseh be persuaded by the captain and the owner of the ship rather than by the 213 Gtorm (18-20) THE AMBASSADOR IN BONDS things which Paul said. And as the harbor was incon venient for wintering in, the majority advised putting to sea to try to reach Phoenix, a Cretan harbor facing southwest and northwest, in order to winter there. The^ When a Ught southerly breeze sprung up, they thought that they had secured theh object. After weighing an chor they ran close along the coast of Crete ; but it was not long before a tempestuous wind called Euroklydon rushed down. The ship was caught and was not able to face the wind; so we gave up and let it drive. Then we ran along the lee of a Uttle island caUed Cauda, where we managed with great difficulty to secure the ship's boat. After hoist ing it on board, they used ropes to underghd the ship. Fearing lest they should be stranded on the Syrtis quick sands, they lowered the sail and lay to. But as we were being terribly battered by the storm, they began to tighten the ship the next day, and on the third day they threw the ship's tackle overboard with theh own hands. Then for many days, neither sun nor stars were seen and a heavy gale still raged so that at last all hope of our being saved was taken away. Paul's Now when they had gone a long time without food, Paul JJJPenf stood forth in theh midst and said, Men, you should have cour- listened to me and not have set sati from Crete and thus ment spared yourself this hardship and loss. But now I bid you <"¦*> have courage, for there will be no loss of tiie, only of the ship, for last night an angel of the God to whom I belong and whom I serve, stood beside me and said, ' Fear not, Paul, for you must stand before Caesar. Behold also, God hath granted you the Uves of aU those who are sailing with you.' Therefore, have courage, men ! For I believe God and that it wtil be just as I have been told. But we are to be stranded on a certain island. Ap- It was now the fourteenth night and we were drifting toiand through the Sea of Adria, when the sailors in the middle of <"-"> the night suspected that land was near. And when they cast the lead, they found twenty fathoms of water and a little further, when they cast the lead, they found fifteen. Then, fearing lest we should be stranded on the rocks, they threw out four anchors from the stern and longed for 214 PAUL'S SHIPWRECK the day. The sailors were trying to escape from the ship and had even lowered the boat in the sea, pretending that they were going to lay out anchors from the bow, when Paul said to the officers and the soldiers, Unless these men stay in the ship you cannot be saved. Then the soldiers cut away the ropes of the boat and let her faU off. Just before daybreak, Paul begged them all to take some Pauls food, saying, To-day is the fourteenth day that you have $££)* been anxiously watching and fasting without taking food. Therefore I beg of you take some food, for this wtil keep you ahve ; indeed, not one hah of your heads will perish. After he had said these words, he took a loaf and, after giving thanks to God, he broke and began to eat it in the presence of them all. Then they were aU encouraged and they themselves took food. There were about seventy- six souls of us on board. And when they had eaten enough, they tightened the ship by throwing the wheat into the sea. When it was day, they could not recognize what land it The was ; but they noticed a certain inlet with a sandy beach on ^^ which they planned if possible to run the ship ashore. So ("¦") cutting away the anchors, they left them in the sea. At the same time unloosing the ropes which tied the rudders and hoisting the foresail to the wind, they made for the beach. Coming to a place where two seas met, they stranded the ship. The prow, sticking fast, remained im movable, but the stern began to go to pieces on account of the beating of the waves. Then the soldiers counselled that they should ktil the prisoners lest some one of them might swim ashore and escape. But the officer, desiring to save Paul, prevented them from carrying out theh plan and commanded that those who were able to swim should jump overboard first and get to land and that the rest should foUow, some on planks and the others on pieces of wreck age. Thus, they aU got safely to land. Now, after we had escaped, we found that the island was Paul's caUed Malta. The rude natives showed us more than or dinary kindness, for they Ughted a fire and welcomed us all because of the pouring rain and the cold. Now, when Paul had gathered a bundle of sticks and put them on the fire, a viper driven forth by the heat fastened itseh on his 215 experience •withthe¦viper (28H) THE AMBASSADOR IN BONDS hand. When the natives saw the creature hanging from his hand, they said to one another, Undoubtedly this man is a murderer ! Though he has escaped from the sea, justice wtil not let him Uve. He, however, shook off the creature into the fire and suffered no harm. But the natives waited for him to swell up or suddenly faU down dead; but after waiting a long time and seeing that no harm came to him, they changed theh minds and said that he was a god. Paul's In the same part of the island there was an estate belong- healing ing to the governor, whose name was PubUus. He wel- C10) corned us and entertained us most hospitably for three days. Now it happened that the father of PubUus was lying til of fever and dysentery; so Paul went in to see him and after he had prayed, laid his hands on him and cured him. When this had happened, the other sick people in the island also came and were cured. Moreover, they loaded us with many honors and when we set sail they provided us with aU those things which we needed. voyage After three months we set sati in an Alexandrian ship Puteoii called The Twin Brothers, which had wintered in the is- ("-") land. And touching at Syracuse, we remained there three days. Then tacking around we reached Rhegium. A day later a south wind sprang up and we arrived tiie second day at PuteoU where we found Christian brothers and were urged to spend a week with them. Paul at Thus, we reached Rome. From thence, brothers who (iS°™e had heard about us, came out to meet us as far as the •"• "> Forum of Appius and the Three Taverns. And when Paul saw them, he thanked God and took courage. When we finaUy reached Rome, Paul was aUowed to Uve by himseh with a soldier to guard him. For two entire years he Uved in his own hired house, receiving all who came to him, preaching the Kingdom of God and teaching about the Lord Jesus Christ, quite openly and without hindrance. I. Paul's Imprisonment under Felix. Paul's transfer from Jerusalem to Caesarea delivered him from assassination at the hands of the Jews but brought him under the power of Felix, one of the most unprincipled of the Roman procurators who ruled during this period over the troubled province of Judea. Like his brother Pallas, Felix 216 PAUL'S IMPRISONMENT UNDER FELIX was probably once a slave of Antonia, the mother of the emperor Claudius. The conservative Roman historian Tacitus thus tersely describes him: "He exercised the prerogative of a king in the spirit of a slave, with superlative cruelty and licentiousness" (59). His rule, as procurator, was in keeping with his character. He so exas perated his Jewish subjects that the Zealots and the Sicarii, the Nihil ists of that period, fomented a series of rebellions which were merci lessly repressed by Felix. Popular messiahs, some of them secretly in league with Felix, also kindled false hopes among the common people and gave him further opportunity for pillage and confiscation. The statement, therefore, that Felix kept Paul in prison for two years, hoping to extract from him a bribe, is in perfect keeping with the character of this former slave, who by a turn of the wheel of fortune had been received into the imperial circle and had married, first a daughter of Mark Anthony and Cleopatra, and later Drusilla, the daughter of Herod Agrippa I. The account of Paul's trial before Felix is probably based on Luke's memory of the event. The flattering words addressed to Felix by the orator, Tertullus, were well calculated to win a favorable hearing, but they were a parody upon the facts. In declaring that Paul was a disturber of the peace, Tertullus appealed to Felix on a point in re gard to which he was exceedingly sensitive. Paul's reply is a notable example of direct, powerful oratory and probably represents the main points in the great apostle's address. His Roman citizenship probably alone saved him from an adverse decision. Felix had heard from Paul's own lips that his mission to Jerusalem was to bear funds from the Gen tile churches. This fact was evidently the basis of his hope of securing a rich bribe. His mercenary purpose also explains the large degree of freedom which he granted to Paul. Instead of being mcarcerated in a vile prison, the apostle was placed under the charge of a Roman mili tary officer and allowed considerable liberty. The narrative of Acts is largely silent regarding the details of these two years. For Paul, however, they were years of intense intellectual and literary activity. His later letters suggest that he continued his correspondence with the Western churches and directed his lieutenants. Luke's silence re garding this period indicates that he returned to the Greek churches and possibly brought back at the end of the two years further contribu tions for Paul's support. Caesarea was already one of the great in tellectual centres of Syria, and Paul evidently improved the oppor tunities which it offered for further study. There is evidence in his 217 THE AMBASSADOR IN BONDS later writing that during this period he read certain apocalyptic writ ings such as the Assumption of Moses and an otherwise unknown writing which Epiphanius designates as the Apocalypse of Elias. Also in the light of Paul's later letters it is evident that his conceptions of Jesus and of the significance of his work still further developed dur ing these years so rich in their opportunities for meditation. II. The Date of the Procuratorships of Felix and Festus. The retirement of Felix and the succession of Festus to the procurator- ship is one of the landmarks in New Testament chronology. Josephus states that "when Portius Festus was sent to succeed Felix, the leading Jewish inhabitants of Caesarea went up to Rome to accuse Felix. He would certainly have been brought to punishment for his mis deeds toward the Jews had not Nero yielded to the importunate solici tations of Felix's brother, Pallas, whom he at that time held in the greatest honor." Tacitus in his Annals (1323) states that Pallas fell from Nero's favor in the year 55 a.d. This definite statement would fix very closely the date of the beginning of the procuratorship of Festus, did not Tacitus also add in the same context that Pallas was later tried and acquitted by an unprincipled judge by the name of Paetus, although, "the approved innocence of Pallas did not please men so much as his arrogance offended them." It is possible that this reference means that Pallas was later restored to Nero's favor. His restoration, however, is only a possibility. It is, on the whole, more probable that Felix was retired and Festus entered upon his proconsulship as early as 55 or 56 a.d. III. Paul's Reasons for Appealing to Caesar. Festus appears, on the whole, to have been one of the best of the Roman procurators. He was unfamiliar, however, with Jewish institutions. The accession of a new procurator encouraged Paul's Jewish foes to beheve that they might secure a verdict against him, for Festus was naturally eager to win the favor of the leaders of the nation. The narrative of Acts suggests that Festus suspected their demand that Paul be transferred for trial to Jerusalem. At the same time, as a Roman ruler intent upon restoring peace to the province which had been torn by dis sensions and riots as a result of the unprincipled rule of Felix, Festus naturally looked with suspicion upon the prisoner Paul. He evidently regarded him as a religious fanatic and therefore one to be carefully watched. Festus's desire to please the Jews evidently so overruled his Roman sense of justice that he was inclined to yield to the de mands of the high priest and transfer Paul's trial to Jerusalem. This 218 PAUL'S APPEAL TO OESAR decision left Paul in a most critical position. To go to Jerusalem was to face the danger of secret assassination and tlie probability of ulti mate condemnation, for a man like Paul, whose activity had so often aroused the mob, was regarded by the Roman officials as a criminal, even though he be innocent of any evil intent. On the other hand, as we know from Paul's letter to the Romans, his chief passion at this time was to visit the imperial city. Hence his appeal to Caesar. As a Roman citizen he possessed the right of appeal and Festus had no valid grounds for refusing it. Paul's later examination before King Agrippa II, the son of Herod Agrippa I, was an unimportant episode, except that it reveals still further the heroic spirit of the great apostle and his zeal to improve every possible opportunity to proclaim the religion of his Master. It was evidently introduced by Luke as a further illustration of the fact that the Roman officials found nothing in the work of Paul worthy of condemnation. IV. The Story of His Shipwreck. The account of Paul's voy age and shipwreck is one of the classical passages of the New Testa ment. It gives us the most vivid picture in ancient literature of the life of the courageous mariners who defied in their little craft the perils of the sea. Most travellers bound from Palestine to Rome by the sea route embarked at Caesarea, Accho, or Tyre. The small ships which plied from these ports sailed close to the shores of Syria and Asia Minor. There their passengers often transshipped, as did Paul at Myra in southern Lycia, in one of the larger Alexandrian grain ships, which sailed from the great Egyptian seaport directly to Rome. Thence the ordinary course ran past Rhodes, along the southern shore of Crete, where there were favorable harbors and thence north westerly past the southern shores of Greece until they felt in their sails the northern winds which came down through the Adriatic and which bore them quickly to the eastern shores of Sicily. There they turned abruptly northward through the Straits of Messina and sailed directly to Puteoli or the mouth of the Tiber. The open season for navigation was ended by the 10th of November, although, according to the Latin writer Vegitius, the favorable season was limited to four short months between May 26 and September 14. Paul was placed as a prisoner under the charge of the centurion Julius, who was apparently one of the many officers under the immedi ate direction of the emperor. With him went Aristarchus, whom Paul in Colossians 410 speaks of as his "fellow prisoner." According 219 THE AMBASSADOR IN BONDS to the Western text, the journey from Sidon to Myra took fifteen days. The accepted text states that they met adverse winds which retarded/ their progress and compelled them to sail south of the Island of Cyprus, rather than skirt the shores of Syria and Asia Minor. From the first Paul seemed to have won the respect and later the genuine affection of the Roman official in whose charge he had been placed. With his usual enthusiasm and energy the apostle entered heartily into the discussion as to whether or not they should venture to continue their belated voyage along the southern shores of Crete. Paul's experience and good judgment led him to oppose this plan, but the counsel of the captain and the owner of the ship overruled his advice. The reference to the Feast of the Atonement indicates that they were venturing beyond the open season for sailing, and the event signally confirmed the wisdom of Paul's counsel. The vivid description of the storm and shipwreck needs no interpretation. Above it all Paul rises sane and serene, again the master of the situation. In the hour of crisis, as so often in his experience, his dauntless faith expressed itself first through a heavenly vision and then through words of cheer and inspiration. Here we see the reasons why Paul gained an in vincible hold upon the affections and wills of men. Good faith, good fellowship, and unceasing confidence in the unlimited power and the constant guidance of a kindly Providence inspired him and all to whom he spoke. Even the venomous serpent, probably still par alyzed by the cold, seemed to the onlookers to have no power over this man who was in such close league with the Infinite. Even the sick were given new hope and health by his sympathetic touch. The miracles which Luke records seem but commonplaces in the life of Paul. As we have aheady seen, the apostle himself regarded them simply as incidental proofs of his divine commission. Before their three months' sojourn was over, not only the governor but also the en tire population of the little island of Malta were vying with each other in showing hospitality to the Roman prisoner who had appealed to Caesar. V. Paul's Journey to Rome. After Paul and his strange com pany had spent three winter months in Malta they set out on an Alexandrian ship for Rome. Instead of going around to the mouth of the Tiber they entered the Bay of Naples and landed at Puteoli. It was a period when the beautiful Italian springtime was just burst ing forth in its glory. Puteoli was at this time the favorite watermg resort of the Roman nobility whose magnificent villas skirted the Bay 220 PAUL'S JOURNEY TO ROME of Naples. Dearer to the heart of Paul than the beauties of nature and the creations of man was the hearty welcome which he received from the Christian brothers residing there. His friend, the Roman centurion, allowed him to spend the week with them. On his arrival a messenger had evidently been sent to inform the Christians at Rome, for, as he proceeded on his journey, a deputation met him at the Forum of Appius, forty-three miles south of Rome. To Paul this evidence of their loyalty was a great inspiration. More as a trium phant conqueror than as a prisoner under a serious charge, he proceeded along the famous Appian Way toward the Imperial City which he en tered at the Porta Capaena. Thence he probably proceeded through the heart of the city, viewing the Palatine with its stately palaces on the left, past the old Forum toward the northern side of the city where was situated the camp of the pretorian guard. VI. The End of the Race. Luke states that for two years Paul lived in his own hired house, receiving all that came to him, preaching the Kingdom of God, and teaching about the Lord Jesus Christ, quite openly and without hinderance. This remarkable freedom may have been due to the influence of his friend the Roman centurion. It was entirely in keeping with the Roman custom of the period. Tacitus states in his Annals (63) that Gallio, the brother of Seneca, who had been proconsul of Achaia during Paul's activity at Corinth and who, like the great apostle, met his death at the hands of Nero, was thus kept under guard, not in his own hired house but in the house of a Roman officer. One of Luke's chief aims was to show that, while the hand of Christian fellowship had been freely extended to the Jews, they had almost invariably taken the initiative in persecuting the Christians. He, therefore, departs from the direct narrative to tell us that Paul, soon after his arrival, called together the leading Jews of Rome, stated his case, and appealed to their sense of justice. Not having received any news from their fellow Jews in Palestine, they were at first inclined to accept his story, but the majority of them re fused to accept his teachings. Luke's condensed narrative leads us to imply that Paul in the end failed to win that support from the Jews at Rome which he sorely needed. It was so contrary to his character istic tact to upbraid them for their failure to accept the Christian faith that it is probable that this portion of the narrative has been somewhat colored by Luke's apologetic purpose. The significant fact underlying the narrative is that Paul fully recognized the peril of his position and the importance of conciUating, if possible, the Jews 221 THE AMBASSADOR IN BONDS at Rome. The abrupt ending of Luke's narrative is in itself ominous. If Paul had been liberated by the Roman emperor, Luke would have been the first to proclaim this fact, for it would have conserved as nothing else could one of the chief aims for which he wrote. Luke, on the other hand, was not writing a book of martyrs. Nothing is said of the death of Peter, the other leading character in his history. The death of James is passed over with the barest mention. The martyrdom of Stephen alone is recorded in detail because of its power ful influence on the expansion of the Christian church. The tradition that Paul was released to preach in the West cannot be traced earlier than the end of the second Christian century and was probably based on the apostle's expression of the hope, in Romans 1524, that he might live to visit Spain. The long delay of Paul's trial is in perfect keep ing with all that we know about Nero and especially the early, irrespon sible years of his reign when he spent practically all of his time in the pursuit of pleasure and left the direction of pubhc affairs to his old teacher Seneca, the Stoic philosopher, and to Burrus, the pretorian prefect. This long delay also gave Paul's Jewish foes, of whom the heads of the priestly hierarchy at Jerusalem were the chief, an op portunity to collect ample evidence against him. There was much that they could present to blacken his character in the eyes of the Roman officials, who, in dealing with a prisoner charged with stirring up sedition, were not so much concerned with motives as with acts. Even Luke's narrative indicates that wherever Paul went he aroused bitter opposition which frequently expressed itself in mob attack and popular uproar. In II Timothy 4 we evidently have notes from the closing days of Paul's life. In 414 the apostle speaks of Alexander the blacksmith: "He has done me a great harm; the Lord will pay him back for what he has done. Beware of him for he has been bit terly hostile to everything that I have said." It is not impossible that this is Alexander the Jew of Ephesus, who, according to Acts 1933, was put forward as spokesman when the silversmiths and tradesmen of that temple city rose up to mob Paul and his associates. In II Timothy 416' " Paul adds pathetically: "The first time there was no one to defend me, but all deserted me. May this not be brought up against them! But the Lord supported me and gave me strength. ... I was rescued from the jaws of the lion." In the light of u we see him alone, with only the faithful Luke to comfort him, fighting his last great fight. Pitted against him were the same foes that had, under the shadow of Roman authority a quarter of a century before, 222 THE END OF THE RACE hunted to death his innocent Master. The analogies between the two scenes are strikingly close. The actors and setting alone are different. Jesus faced death at the capital city of his nation. Paul the Roman citizen died at the capital of the empire to which he owed allegiance. Clement of Rome, who hved near the close of the first century, wrote : "Paul by his example pointed out the prize of patient endurance, . . . he won the noble renown, which was the reward of his faith, having taught righteousness to the whole world and having reached the farthest bounds of the West. And when he had borne his testimony before the rulers, he departed from the world and went into the holy place, having been found a notable example of patient endurance." Tertullian, who wrote in the second century, is more explicit: "Paul has for his crown the same death with John (the Baptist)." And Origen, early in the third century, states definitely that Paul "suf fered martyrdom in Rome under Nero." Paul was probably beheaded at Rome in 57 or 58 a.d., early in the reign of Nero. In II Timothy 4s"8 we have his final song of triumph: "I am already being poured out as a drink offering and my time to go has come. I have fought the good fight, I have run the race, I have kept the faith. Hence forth there is left for me the crown of righteousness which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me on that great day — and not only to me but to all who have loved the thought of his appearing." § CLXIV. THE LAST LETTERS OF THE AGED PRISONER Paul, a prisoner of Jesus Christ and Timothy our brother, Greet- to our beloved fellow-worker, Philemon, to our sister Apphia, (pghi. to our feUow-soldier, Archippus, and to the church which J^"10™ meets in your house. May grace and peace be granted you all from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. I always give thanks to my God when I mention you in Thanks- my prayers; for as I hear of your love and faith which you ffi^ manifest toward the Lord Jesus and to all the saints, I pray that theh participation in your faith may result in theh gaining a clear knowledge of all the good we enjoy through our relations to Christ. For I have had great joy and com fort in your love, my brother, because the hearts of the saints have been refreshed through you. Therefore, although in Christ I might be quite free to ward you to command you to do what is fitting, I appeal to 223 LAST LETTERS OF THE AGED PRISONER Appeal you rather on the ground of love. So as Paul, the old man, ciem- who is now a prisoner for Christ Jesus, I appeal to you on toward *>eha.]i of my spiritual chUd who was born while I was in onesi- chains — Onesimus! Once you found him worthless, but now, (K?) true to his name (Profitable),'he is worth something both to you and to me. I am sending him back to you, though it means parting with my very heart. I would have liked to keep him with me, that in your stead he might serve me during my imprisonment for the gospel; but I wish to do nothing without your consent, so that this kind act of yours might not be done under compulsion but of your own free wtil. For Perhaps it was for this very reason that he was parted sider- fr°m you f°r a whtie, that you might receive him back for treat- S000-> n0 longer as a slave but something more than a slave mint — a brother, pecuharly dear to me, but even dearer to (1M0) you both as a human being and as a feUow Christian ! Therefore if you regard me as a partner, then receive him as you would me. And if he has done anything dishonest or owes you any sum, put that down to my account: 'I, Paul, write this with my own hand, I wtil pay it back.' (I say nothing of the fact that you owe me, over and above, your very soul.) Yes, brother, let me have some return from you in the Lord ! Refresh my heart in Christ. Paul's I write you, trusting in your obedience. I know you will (£5!) do even more than I say, and at the same time get quarters ready for me, for I hope that through your prayers I may be sent back to you ! oon: Epaphras, my feUow prisoner in Christ, salutes you, as safuu-8 do also Mark, Aristarchus, Demas and Luke, my feUow- £?£, workers. May the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with your spirit. Amen. (28-2&J Greet ing (Co! Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the wtil of God, and Timothy, our brother, to the consecrated and faithful ¦ ) brothers in Christ at Colossae. May grace and peace be granted to you from God our Father. Tharto- We always give thanks to God, the Father of our Lord f^ns Jesus Christ, when we pray for you because we have heard of your faith in Christ Jesus and of the love which you cher- 224 THANKSGIVING FOR FAITH OF THE COLOSSIANS ish for aU the saints on account of the hope laid up for you in heaven. You have heard of this hope in the message of gospel truth which has come to you, as it spreads over all the world, yielding fruit and increasing, as it also has done among you from the day that you heard it and learned to know what God's grace reaUy is, as indeed you did learn to know it from Epaphras, our beloved feUow servant. He is a faithful minister of Christ in your behah and it is he who has informed us of your love in the Spirit. Now I rejoice in my sufferings in your behah, and I would Pauls make up in my own person whatever is lacking of the suf- Sn ferings which Christ has to suffer in behah of his body, the ^W church. I have been appointed a minister of the church Gen- in the position intrusted to me by God in your interests, flT-2») to present God's message fuUy, even that secret which, though concealed from all ages and generations, now has been disclosed to his saints. God willed that they should understand the glorious wealth which this secret holds for the Gentiles — this secret which is Christ in you as your hope of glory. Him we proclaim, training and teaching every man in aU wisdom in order that we may present every man before God, perfect in Christ. For this end I labor, striving with a divine energy which is working might- Uy within me. Yes, I want you to know how severe is the struggle in which I am engaged in behah of you and the brothers in Laodicea and for all who have never seen my face, that theh hearts may be encouraged, that they may be welded together in love, that they may have aU the wealth of conviction that comes from insight, and that they may know the secret of God which is Christ, in whom all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge Ue hidden ! Therefore, since you have received the Messiah, even Christ's Jesus the Lord, Uve your Ufe in him, being firmly rooted j*^ and founded in him, confirmed in the faith, as you have ^dn been taught it, and fined to overflowing with gratitude to power5 God. Take care lest anyone lead you away prisoner by his ('"u) philosophy or idle fancy based on human tradition, or on a belief in the elemental spirits of the world and not on Christ. For it is in Christ that the entire fullness of the divine na ture dwells embodied and in him you are made perfect. 225 Christ (3> B-ll' LAST LETTERS OF THE AGED PRISONER It is he who is the head of aU rulers and powers; in him you have also been chcumcised with a circumcision not performed by human hand, but with Christ's own circum cision, which consists in the putting off of the body of flesh, for you were buried with him in baptism and thereby raised with him through faith in the power of God which raised him from the dead. what li, therefore, you have risen with Christ, seek those means things which are above, where Christ is seated at the raked "Sn* nan'¦ !) Lord Jesus Christ. Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ Thanks. who hath blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the fijjj118 heavenly realms through Christ! He chose us in him before the creation of the world that we might be conse crated and without blemish in his sight, destining us to be his sons through Jesus Christ. Therefore, remember that once you were GentUes in The the flesh, who are called the ' Uncircumcision ' by the so- Jrfjew called ' Circumcision,' which is the work of human hands g^ in the flesh. Remember that you were at that time out- tiiejn side Christ, ahens to the commonwealth of Israel and strangers to the covenants of the promise, without hope and without God in the world. But now in Christ Jesus you, who were once far away, have been brought near by the blood of Christ. For he is our peace— he who united us both and broke down the hostile dividing wall. In his own flesh he set aside the law with its definite commands so as to make peace by uniting these two parts in himseh into a new mankind. Thus in himseh he put an end to that hostility by reconciling both Jew and GentUe to God in one body through the cross. And he came to proclaim a gospel of peace to you Gentiles who were far away and to the Jews who were near, for it is through him that we both have ac cess by one Spirit to the Father. 227 Christ (2U-18) LAST LETTERS OF THE AGED PRISONER Trmty There is one body and one spirit — one hope was held church out to you as the goal of your calling— one Lord, one faith, (4"> one baptism, one God and Father of aU, who is over us all, acts through us aU, and is in us aU. But to each of us has been given his own grace, according to the measure of the gift of Christ. The Christ himseh granted some to be apostles, some to be bodyin prophets, some to be evangeUsts, some to be pastors and SSf* teachers, in order that the saints may be fuUy equipped for the work of service, that is, for the upbuUding of the body of Christ, untU we aU attain the unity of the faith and the knowledge of God's son, even to the perfect manhood and to the full measure of maturity which belongs to the fullness of Christ, that we may no longer be babes, blown from our course and carried here and there by every passing wind of doctrine, by the adroitness of men who are skilful in mak ing use of every evU device to mislead. Rather we are to hold to the truth and by our love grow up whoUy into union with him who is our head, even Christ. Dependent on him, the whole body is welded together and compacted by every joint with which it is supptied, and by the due activity of each part the body is enabled to grow so as to build itseh up in love. The Put away aU bitterness and passion, anger, clamoring efty " and insults, together with aU malice. Be kind to one an- (Si? other, tender hearted, forgiving one another, as God in s») Christ has also forgiven you. Therefore, be imitators of God, as his beloved children, and lead Uves of love just as Christ loved you and gave himseh up for you to be a fra grant offering and sacrifice to God. Arm- In conclusion, be strong in the Lord and in the strength fof the of his might. Put on the complete armor of God, so as to long be abie to stand against the stratagems of the devU. For fljct we have to struggle not with flesh and blood but against ' } rulers and authorities, against the forces which govern this darkened world, against the spiritual hosts of evil ar rayed against us in the heavens. Therefore put on the complete armor of God that you may be able to stand on the evil day and remain victors over all. Stand, therefore, fastening the girdle of truth about your loins, putting on the breastplate of righteousness, and having your feet shod 228 sonal notes ARMING FOR THE LONG CONFLICT with the preparation of the gospel of peace. Above all, take the shield of faith by which you will be able to quench all the flaming darts of the evil one. Take the helmet of salvation and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God. Pray at aU times in the Spirit, with all manner of prayer and entreaty. Be alert to seize every such oppor tunity, interceding in behah of aU the saints and in my behalf also, that speech may be given me, that I may ex pound fuUy and openly the mystery of the gospel on behah of which I am an ambassador in bonds, that I may have freedom to speak boldly as I ought. Our beloved brother Tychicus, a faithful minister in the Per- Lord, wtil give you aU the information about me, that you "'_"_'_ may know how I am doing; that is why I am sending/ him to (2IM) you that you may know all about me and that he may en courage your hearts. Peace and love with faith be to the brothers from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. May grace be with aU who love our Lord Jesus Christ sincerely. Paul and Timothy, servants of Jesus Christ, to aU the Greet- saints in Christ Jesus who are at Phitippi, as weU as to ^,shi,. the bishops and deacons : Grace and peace to you from God >'¦ 2) our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ. I thank my God whenever I remember you; in aU my Thanks- prayers for you aU I always pray with joy because of your co- g^ng operation jin furthering the gospel from the very first day to vmt- this moment. For of this I am confident, that he who began tfonof the good work in you will go on to perfect it until the day of f^f" Jesus Christ. It is only right for me to be thus thinking of <*-u) you all, for in my prison and as I defend and confirm the gospel, I recaU how you aU share with me the same grace. God is my witness that I yearn for you aU with the tender affection of Christ Jesus himseh. And this is my prayer that your love may become richer and richer in knowledge and in all manner of insight, that you may be able to make right distinctions, so that you may be men of transparent character and that you may do no harm to any one, in view of the day of Christ, and that you may be fuU of the fruits of righteousness, which come through Jesus Christ to the glory and praise of God. Now I would have you know, brothers, that the things 229 LAST LETTERS OF THE AGED PRISONER The which have befaUen me have reaUy tended to advance the nateu" gospel; throughout the whole of the pretorian guard and effects everywhere else it is generally recognized that I am im- Pauis prisoned for the sake of Christ, and most of the brothers ^on. have through my imprisonment gained greater confidence ment jn the Lord to speak fearlessly the word of God. ms I know that this wtil result in my release, because of your calm prayers and the supply of the Sphit of Jesus Christ, in ful- tude fiUment of my earnest expectation and hope that I may toward never feel ashamed, but that, now as ever, by my boldness o™s Christ may be honored in my person, whether by Ufe or $?Sf by death. For me to Uve is Christ and to die is gain. But, if it is to Uve in the body, this means for me fruitful work; but what I should choose I know not. I am in a dilemma between the two. I have a strong deshe to depart and be with Christ, for that is by far the best. But for your sakes it is more necessary that I should live on here in the flesh. And since I am sure of this, I know that I shall abide and remain with you aU, to promote your progress and joy in the faith. Thus you wtil have ample cause to glory in Jesus Christ over me, as a result of my again being with you. Exhor- Rejoice in the Lord always. Again I say, Rejoice. Let tot>en Your forbearance be known to all men. The Lord is at joyful hand. Be anxious about nothing; but in regard to every- caim thing make known your requests to God in prayer and (4'"') supptication with thanksgiving; so shaU the peace of God, which surpasses aU understanding, keep guard over your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus. cher- FinaUy, brothers, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever noMe things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever thoughts things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good repute — ii there be any virtue or anything worthy of praise— think on these things. Practise also what you have learned and received and heard and seen in me; then the God of peace will be with you. But I rejoice in the Lord greatly that now at length you have revived your thoughtfulness for me; for you were ever thoughtful, but you lacked opportunity. Not that I speak of want, for I have learned how to be content wher ever I am. I know how to Uve humbly; I also know how to 230 THANKSGIVING FOR KINDNESS Uve amidst abundance. I have been initiated into each T^^s and every secret of Ufe, both of plenty and of hunger, of p?ac-e abundance and of want. I can do all things in him who jjigj}. strengtheneth me. Yet it was beautiful of you to share in ness my affliction. You PhiUppians know weU that, in the be- phiiip- ginning of the gospel, when I departed from Macedonia, no $£J|s- church but yours had any communication with me about tians giving and receiving; even when I was m Thessalonica you sent money once and again for my needs. It is not the money I am anxious about, but what I am anxious about is the interest that accumulates in this way to your credit! I have enough of everything and more than enough. I am amply supplied with what you sent by Epaphroditus; it is a fragrant perfume, a sacrifice acceptable, weU pleasing to God. And my God wtil supply aU your own needs from his wealth in glory in Christ Jesus. Glory to God our Father for ever and ever. Amen. I. Paul's Last Letters. Bound in chains and faping almost certain death, Paul continued to direct the churches of his planting by means of letters and faithful messengers. Five and possibly six of his surviving letters come from this period of imprisonment. They fall into two groups. The first group includes the letters to Philemon and the Colossians and the one which at present bears the name Ephesians. From references within them we learn that all three were sent at the same time in the care of Tychicus and Onesimus to Paul's friends in Asia Minor. The letter to the Philippians was written when Paul had already begun to feel the pinch of poverty. In this letter he promises to send Timothy to them ere long. In the closing chapter of II Timothy, which is unquestionably Pauline, his faithful fellow worker has already left him and, save for Luke, he is quite alone. This, therefore, represents the last of that remarkable series of letters which had come from the great apostle to the Gentiles. They contain Paul's dying testament. In them he has endeavored to formulate the heart of the message with which he has been intrusted and to explain the mystery of the gospel. As the result, they are, with the exception of Romans, the most doctrinal of his epistles. Under the shadow of his coming death he was evidently relaxing his hold on the detailed problems of individual churches. The distinctions between Jew and Gentile and the conflicts about the ceremonial law 231 LAST LETTERS OF THE AGED PRISONER are but distant memories. Instead his thoughts are fixed on the eternal verities. As he himself tells us, he is now an old man. The reader sometimes misses the fiery vigor and the crisp incisiveness that characterize Paul's earher controversial letters. The strength and charm of these letters Ues in the wealth of rich and warm emotion which pervades them. The stream of love and brotherly kindness, which runs through all of his writings, now broadens and deepens. Paul is here intimately revealed as the friend and loving adviser of master and slave, of saint and sinner, of those strong in the Christian faith and of those perplexed with doubts. He is anxious about his own future only as it will affect his friends. Like his Master, he faces life and death unafraid. The peace of Christ completely fills his heart and brims over into these peerless love-letters. They also develop certain profound and important religious conceptions which he had only hinted at in his earlier letters. II. The Occasion of Paul's Letter to Philemon. Paul's letter to Philemon and that in Romans 16 are the only personal notes that have survived from the apostle's voluminous correspondence. From Colossians 49 we learn that Philemon was probably a native of the little town of Colossae on the great highway that ran eastward from Ephesus. Paul's words imply that he was one of the converts won during the apostle's ministry at Ephesus. The letter is addressed to Philemon and his wife Apphia and to Archippus, who was probably their son. Philemon was evidently a wealthy and influential man. At this home the Christian church held its meetings, and Archippus was their leader. Among the many whom Paul had attracted to him through his personality and preaching, while a prisoner at Rome, was the runaway slave Onesimus — a part of the vast human wreckage that gravitated irresistibly to Rome. The confession of this genuinely converted slave revealed the fact that he had once belonged to Paul's friend Philemon and that he had not only run away but had probably stolen from his master. Both of these offenses, according to Roman law, were punishable by death. Paul's faith in the social efficiency of Christianity is signally illustrated by what he did. Into the hands of the runaway slave he put this letter and confidently sent hir" back to his master. It breathed the spirit of good-fellowship, mutual confidence, and brotherly kindness. It reveals a democracy that over leaps all social distinctions. With kindly humor that is not the least of Paul's many attractions he makes a friendly pun on the name of Onesimus (Profitable). It is the letter of a courtly, noble-minded 232 THE LETTER TO PHILEMON Christian gentleman, forgetful of self and intent simply upon establish ing goodwill between all men. It also well illustrates Paul's superla tive tact. Not by command, but by an appeal to Philemon's generosity, he insures a hearty welcome and full forgiveness for the once dishonest, runaway slave. This homely little letter is, therefore, of large signifi cance, for it presents Christianity not in theory but in practice, and introduces us to two worthy citizens of the ideal Christian community which Paul was seeking to make world-wide. III. The Purpose and Thought of Paul's Epistle to the Colossians. Like the Epistle to the Romans, this letter was ap parently written to the members of a church which Paul had never visited. Its general structure closely resembles that of the larger epistle. It begins with the usual greeting and thanksgiving (l1-23). The doctrinal and most important section is found in \2i-2[l3, the prac tical apphcations in S1-^6, and the concluding notes and salutations in 47"18. The occasion of the letter was a visit of Epaphras, a faith ful Christian, who laid before Paul the complex problems which were troubling the Christians of Colossae. Colossae, by virtue of its geo graphical situation was pecuharly exposed to the gnostic and Greek influences which emanated from Ephesus on the west, and to the popular doctrines of the mystic religions which came pouring in from the East. Certain Jewish exorcists, who still insisted on the impor tance of ceremonial rites, such as circumcision and strict Sabbath observance, apparently contributed to the confusion of religious ideas and so completed the bewilderment of the simple-minded Christians of Colossae. In this epistle Paul is evidently fighting the current gnostic and mystical religions with their own weapons. It is another graphic illustration of his being "all things to all men." His language and teachings clearly show the influence of his talks with Epaphras. Here behefs partially suggested in earlier epistles are expanded. It is also possible that during his imprisonment Paul had been reading certam current Jewish apocalyptic books. The result is that in this epistle and in its companion, Ephesians, the historical Jesus largely disappears and the Christ is interpreted in the language of the Jewish apocalypses. Like all the Jews of his age, Paul firmly beUeved in hierarchies of angelic beings both good and bad. Through the Jewish belief in personified Wisdom his mind had been opened to the doctrine of the Logos, set forth by the Greek philosophers and Philo. He also appreciated the attractions of the mystery-religions, which offered personal salvation through mystical unity with the Deity. 233 LAST LETTERS OF THE AGED PRISONER The terms in which Paul sets forth his Christology in these epistles are, therefore, not peculiar to him but a part of his varied inheritance. His aim is to make clear to all types of readers his profound conviction that Christ is absolutely supreme above all the elemental spirits of earth and heaven and thus to furnish a practical basis for unity and to prevent discord and factiousness. To those familiar with Greek philosophy he declared: "In Christ the entire fulness of the divine nature dwells in the body." To those who inclined toward the pagan mystery-religions, he said in terms already familiar to them: "You have been buried with him in baptism and thereby raised with him through faith in the power of God which raised him from the dead." The key to the interpretation of his statements is found in his profound and original conception of the mystical social solidarity of the race and of Jesus' unique relation to the ultimate ideal community which he calls the "Body of Christ." With prophetic insight he sees this "new crea tion in which there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcised nor uncir cumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave nor freeman; but Christ is every thing and in all of us." This new mankind is a product of the mind and work of Jesus. His life, his heroic sacrifice, and his abiding spirit are the essential creative forces. Paul evidently has these facts in mind when he declares that "Christ is everything and in all of us." Every noble emotion, every spiritual aspiration, and every prompting of loyalty to the ideal community are felt by Paul to be "Christ in him." Christ represents in Paul's thought those eternal forces at work in the world and in the hearts of men that have already broken down the hos tile dividing wall between Jew and Gentile and are uniting by the bonds of love and brotherhood all mankind into one universal community. In the light of this profound conviction the Pauline Christology, with all its poetic, old-world imagery, becomes the symbol of eternal and intelligible verities. IV. The Identity of the So-called "Epistle to the Ephe= sians." One of the perplexing New Testament problems is the strik ingly close analogy both in structure and thought between the epistle to the Colossians and that addressed (in its present superscription) to the Ephesians. The absence of any reference to specific conditions in the Ephesian church and the relative lateness of the tradition embodied in the superscription make it exceedingly improbable that this epistle was originally sent to the Christian community at Ephesus. In Colossians 416 Paul refers to a letter which he was sending to the Laodi ceans and which he wished the Christians of Colossae also to read. Just why he wrote two letters dealing with practically the same themes 234 THE IDENTITY OF EPHESIANS in very much the same way is not clear; but that he did so is on the whole the best explanation of the existence of Ephesians. Laodicea was only six miles from Colossae, and Hierapolis across the Lycus River was the home of another Christian community. Each of these Christian churches was confronted by the same problems. Realizing how great was the peril and possibly fearing lest the letter to the Colossians might be lost, Paul apparently, in the enforced leisure of his imprisonment, wrote a duplicate letter, at the same time modify ing and expanding the original. It is possible that this second letter bore the superscription, "To the Laodiceans," as is suggested by Marcion and other early authorities. This explanation is, on the whole, more satisfactory than that it is the work of an unknown Christian who used Paul's letter to the Colossians as a foundation on which to build later doctrines. Even though, like Colossians, it reflects many beUefs only hinted at in earlier epistles but found in the complex of reUgions which was the background of Paul's work and thought, its ideas are distinctively Pauline. V. Paul's Love-Letter to the Philippians. The occasion of Paul's letter to the PhiUppians was the visit of one of their number, Epaphroditus, who had brought from them to Paul in prison a gift of much-needed money. The messenger had been seriously ill and homesick at Rome. He accordingly is to be Paul's messenger to the PhiUppian Christians. The apostle's aim is to express his thanks and love, not only for this gift but for the many which had endeared their friendship and bound him pecuharly close to them. It is, therefore, one of the most intimate of his letters. His larger aim is to set forth his faith under trial and thereby to strengthen that of his loyal friends so that they may enjoy in largest measure the peace and happiness that the Christian Ufe affords. Paul's approaching death sanctifies and glorifies this letter. Its detailed aUusions light up the darkness which otherwise shrouds the closing days of his Roman imprison ment. All anxieties and polemics have disappeared. "Rejoice" is its key-note. In fact Paul uses this word so often that in 31 he ex claims, with a characteristic flash of kindly humor: "Well then, my brothers, rejoice in the Lord. I am repeating this word 'rejoice' in my letter, but that does not tire me and it is for you a safe precau tion." Here is spontaneously revealed the joy of a runner who has nearly completed his race — the joy of one who speaks out of his own rich experience. He is stiU hoping that he may be released in order to visit them, but regarding the outcome of his trial he is indifferent, assured that, whether it be life or death, either is gain. In his closing 235 LAST LETTERS OF THE AGED PRISONER words he expresses the wealth of his love for them and reveals his burning zeal to inspire each of them with the serene faith which made life or death for him a joy. VI. Paul's Contribution to Christianity. Chief among the many diflficult tasks which the present generation has undertaken is the evaluation of the work of Paul. Many have contended that he has concealed rather than revealed the personality and teachings of the Master whom he professed to serve. For a generation the question of whether Jesus or Paul is the real founder of Christianity has been hotly discussed. That Paul's beUefs, especially regarding the Christ, were influenced by his Jewish and HeUenic inheritances cannot be questioned. His pictures of a pre-existent, supernatural Messiah who is to come again from heaven to judge mankind and to establish a new kingdom on earth, is very different from the simple portraits of Jesus in the oldest gospel records; but he shared these beliefs with the primi tive church. They are not his unique or permanent contributions to Christianity. It is, therefore, unfortunate that Christian theology in the past has been built more on the teachings of Paul than on those of Jesus. The chief reason is because the material which has come from Paul is far more abundant. His great historic work was the break ing of the bonds of Judaism. In this task he did not work alone, for Stephen and many others shared in this labor; but it was Paul who formulated the declaration of independence and commanded the forces that effected the revolution. He grasped most clearly Jesus' great teaching of individual liberty and made it an accepted tenet in the Christian church. Paul also found the results of Jesus' work and teachings enmeshed in a narrow Jewish environment. He brought them out and held them up before the enraptured gaze of humanity. Moreover, he interpreted the principles of Jesus and the beUefs of his immediate followers into the language and figures current in the larger Graeco-Roman world of his day. Thus Paul was the chief leader in that band of enthusiastic, devoted missionaries who transplanted Christianity from Jewish to Gentile soil. While he was not tiie first Christian missionary, he inspired and directed the great missionary movement of the first century until, through his wise statesmanship and tireless activity, Christianity had been established in all the great cities of the empire. Paul also reared up a large band of efficient Christian preachers and teachers, who multiplied his work and carried its influence to all civilized races. In his life, as weU as in his teachings, Paul interpreted Christianity 236 PAUL'S CONTRIBUTION TO CHRISTIANITY as a personal, spiritual fellowship between God and the individual; at the same time he placed a profound emphasis upon the ethical and social aspects of religion. All generations have recognized that Paul's warm, religious life, his devotion to his Master, and his self-sacrificing heroism are to be counted among the richest heritages of Christendom. The present generation, however, is beginning to appreciate the su preme value of his contribution to the practical interpretation of Jesus' social teachings. He it was who developed the logical and concrete impUcations of his Master's ideal of the Kingdom of God. On the basis of his work with the Christian communities which he established in the fields of his missionary effort he perfected the plan of an ideal community that would include all mankind, that would give every man an opportunity through loyal, loving service to attain fulness of Ufe and happiness and would realize in definite form on earth the lofty, social teachings of his Master. It is, therefore, not as a theologian but as a Christian missionary, statesman, and social organizer that Paul has made his greatest and most permanent con tributions to Christianity. The external structure and the creeds of historic Christianity are largely the results of his building; but, as he always asserted, the foundation on which it is laid is Jesus Christ. 237 CHRISTIANITY DURING THE SECOND HALF OF THE FIRST CENTURY CLXV. THE MESSAGE OF HOPE AND INSPIRATION IN I PETER Greet ing (I Peter theirfuturehope Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ to God's chosen people, the exiles of the dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia, chosen in accordance with the fore knowledge of God the Father through the sanctifying work of the Spirit to obey Jesus Christ and to be sprinkled with his blood. May grace and peace be multiplied to you. Thanks- Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! ^me In accordance with his great mercy he hath caused us to be born anew to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to an inheritance imperishable, undefiled, and unfading. It has been reserved in heaven for you who are guarded by the power of God through faith for a salvation which is ready to be revealed at the last hour. Rejoice, therefore, in this, even though now for a short time you may need to suffer various trials. This suffering is only for the testing of your faith (far more precious than gold which perishes and yet is tested by fire), and it will be found to result in praise and glory and honor at the reappearing of Jesus Christ. Him you love, although you have not looked upon him. Though at present you cannot see him, you nevertheless beUeve in him and you wtil exult with an unspeakable and glorious joy when you ob tain, as the object of your faith, the salvation of your souls. Now that through your obedience to the truth you have purified your souls for a brotherly love that is sincere, love one another heartily and fervently; for you have been born anew, not of mortal but of immortal seed by God's ever- living and enduring word. So put away all malice, aU deceit and insincerity and envy and slander of every kind! 238 The fruits of this newbirth (22. 23, FRUITS OF THE NEW BIRTH Like newly born infants, thirst for the pure spiritual milk, that by it you may grow up to salvation. You are the chosen race, the royal priesthood, the holy The nation, the people who belong to God, that you may pro- i™fel claim the exceUencies of him who called you out of darkness <'• 10) into his marvelous tight. Once you were no people but now you are God's people. Once you were unpitied but now you are pitied. Beloved, I entreat you as sojourners and exiles not to Toat- indulge the fleshly passions which wage war upon the soul, the0* Conduct yourselves properly before the heathen, so that, Jgj£to although they now defame you as evil-doers, they may yet God glorify God, when you are put on trial, because they see (11'1J) your good deeds. Submit for the Lord's sake to every human authority, To whether it be the emperor as supreme or governors sent t0bmit by him for the punishment of evil-doers and the encourage- £^|n ment of those who do what is right. For it is God's will («-") that by doing what is right you should silence the ignorant charges of foolish persons. Be free men, but do not make your freedom an excuse for evil conduct; rather be God's true servants. Honor everyone, love the brotherhood, rev erence God, honor the emperor. Household servants, be submissive to your masters with Duty aU respect, not only to those who are kind and considerate °^S" but also to those who are surly; for it is a merit, when from <18-2'') a sense of a duty to God one patiently endures the pains of suffering unjustly inflicted. For if you do wrong and re ceive a blow for it, what credit is there in your bearing it patiently? But if, when you do right and suffer for it, you bear it patiently this counts as a merit in God's sight. It is for this that you were called, for when Christ also Jesus' suffered in your behah, he left you an example that you pfl™" should foUow hi his footsteps. He committed no sin nor was (21M) guile found in his mouth. When he was reviled he reviled not again; when he suffered he never threatened, but left everything to bim who judgeth justly. He it was who bore our sins in his own body on the cross that we, having died as far as our sins are concerned, may hve for righteousness. By his wounds you have been healed. For you were 239 MESSAGE OF INSPIRATION IN I PETER straying Uke lost sheep, but now you have come back to the Shepherd and Guardian of your souls. Duties In the same way you wives must be submissive to your wives husbands so that, even if some of these husbands do not 6) and with II Maccabees. There are also many points of contact with the Epistle to the Hebrews, and it seems probable that the dependence is on the side of I Peter. On the other hand, this homily is quoted by the author of James and also by Clement of Rome, who wrote about 100 a.d. Even more significant are the repeated allusions to the per sistent persecutions to which the "exiles of the dispersion," that is, the Christians scattered throughout the Roman Empire, are subjected. The only historical situation which fully meets these conditions is furnished by the reign of Domitian, 81-96. They are in exact accord with those which Pliny found in Bithynia a decade or two later. While it would have been chronologically possible for Peter to have written this homily before his death, the persecutions of Nero, as reported by the Roman and Christian historians, do not present the back ground imphed in I Peter. Pliny's reference to a Christian who declared that he had recanted twenty years before may well be a di rect allusion to the persecution which our author contemplated. In the hght of all the facts, therefore, it seems probable that I Peter was written between 90 and 95 a.d., although an earlier dating in the reign of Nero is not absolutely excluded. In certain respects this homily presents a striking analogy to the first half of the book of Acts. In both books Paul is clearly the more original, pioneer spirit. His convictions and energy dominate the situation; but the authors of each of these writings reveal a strong de sire to give to Peter a certain pre-eminence. In each writing the aim also is to reconcile the thought of these two great leaders in the apos tolic church. In Acts the earlier differences were passed over in silence. In I Peter many of the ideas and striking phrases of Paul reappear under the name of the Gahlean apostle. The explanation of this surprising phenomenon is perhaps to be found in the unusual phrase, "through Silvanus," which is found in the postscript to the epistle. 249 MESSAGE OF INSPIRATION IN I PETER The identity of Silvanus is not certain. This postscript indicates that he was Peter's scribe. The preposition that is used, as well as the context, implies that he was more. If the epistle was dictated by the Galilean apostle the present Greek form of the epistle is probably the work of the amanuensis. Furthermore, if Silvanus or Silas is the one who accompanied Paul in his second missionary journey, the prominence of Pauline ideas and phrases is easily explained. The broad outlook of the epistle, the mention of "my son Mark" in the concluding verses, and, above all, of the church in Babylon, as the church which sends greetings, point to Rome as the place where this epistle was written. Tradition furnishes not the least evidence that Peter ever visited Babylon or that Christianity by the middle of the first century had penetrated the valley of the Tigris and Euphrates. As in later Christian literature, Babylon is beyond reasonable doubt a symbolic designation for corrupt Rome, even as "my son" is applied to Mark, not UteraUy but symbolically. The conclusion which on the whole best satisfies these complex facts is that the central teach ings in the epistle came originally from the Ups of Peter, but that the letter in its present form is largely the work of SUvanus or SUas. Writ ing as he probably did at the beginning of the last decade of the first century, when the controversy between Jew and GentUe Christian, between Peter and Paul, was practicaUy forgotten and when Paul's teachings had broadened and deepened the current of Christian thought, he unconsciously, if not deliberately, blended the teachings of the two great apostles and sent the epistle forth in the name of Peter as a practical message of hope and encouragement to the perse cuted Christians in the distant provinces. § CLXVI. THE EARLY CHRISTIAN SERMON IN HEBREWS God's God, who in ancient days spoke to our forefathers in many preme forms and fashions through the prophets, has at the end of revels these days spoken to us through a Son whom he appointed ggough heh of all things, as it was through him that he created the (Heb. universe. He, reflecting the brightness of God's glory and |w> being the exact image of God's own character, upholds aU things by his word of power. After he had secured our purification from sins, he sat down at the right hand of the majesty on high, having become as far superior to the angels as the name he has inherited is superior to theirs. 250 CHRIST'S SUPERIORITY TO ANGELS For to what angel did God ever say, Christ's 0 * superiority to Thou art my son, ?f ??n\ I have this day become thy Father? Or again, I will be a father to him, And he wtil be my son. He says to the Son, Thou didst found the earth at the beginning, O Lord, And the heavens are the work of thy hand. They wtil perish, but thou remainest, They will all grow old Uke a garment, And thou wilt roU them up Uke a mantle, And Uke a garment they shall be changed, But thou art the same, And thy years will never fati. For it was fitting that God, for whom and by whom aU signifl- things exist, after he had brought many sons to glory, should ^nce perfect by suffering, the Pioneer of theh salvation, for both v^™^'3 he who sanctifies and those who are sanctified all have one ?ng er~ Father. It was necessary that he should resemble his i?";*' brothers in every respect in order to prove a merciful and faithful high priest in all things divine, and in order to atone for the sins of the people. For, inasmuch as he has suffered by his temptations, he is able to help those who are tempted. Therefore, holy brothers, you who share a heavenly Christ's calling, fix your thoughts on Jesus, the apostle and high s^tfl'0 priest of our confession. He was faithful to those who ap- M°fes pointed him, just as Moses also was faithful in all God's house. For Jesus has been counted worthy of greater glory than Moses, inasmuch as the founder of the house enjoys greater honor than the house itseh. For every house is founded by some one, but God is the founder of all things. Moreover, Moses was faithful in all God's house as an attendant, in order to bear witness to the things which are to be revealed; but Christ was faithful as a Son 251 U1-') THE EARLY CHRISTIAN SERMON IN HEBREWS over God's house, and we are that house, h we hold firm to the end the confidence and the pride in our hope. our Inasmuch, therefore, as we have a great high priest who tletlca" has passed through the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let Jjf^. us hold firmly our confession of faith. For we have not a (414-u) high priest who is incapable of sympathizing with our weak nesses, but one who has been tempted in aU ways Uke our selves, yet without sinning. So let us approach the throne of grace with confidence, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help us in the hour of need. The Therefore, brothers, since we have confidence to enter £rjpW" the holy Presence by virtue of the blood of Jesus, by the g1^ new and Uving way which he has opened up for us by rend- thus ing the veti, that is, of his earthly nature, and since we have ushed a great priest over the house of God, let us draw near with §0"' a true heart and fuU assurance of faith, having had our hearts sprinkled clean from an evti conscience and our bodies bathed in pure water. Let us hold the hope which we avow without wavering, for he is faithful who gave us the promise. Let us consider how we can sth up one an other to love and to good deeds. En- RecaU the former days, when, after you were enlightened, ^" you endured a hard struggle and much suffering. This f?om was P^ly because you yourselves were being held up as the objects of reproach and persecution and partly because (aw*) you made a common cause with those who were thus treated ; for you not only sympathized with the prisoners but you also accepted the confiscation of your own possessions cheerfuUy, knowing that you have for yourselves more valuable and lasting possessions. Therefore, do not cast aside your confident hope, for it carries with it great reward. For you stand in need of patient endurance, so that, after doing the wtil of God, you may receive what you have been promised. Exam- Now faith is the assurance that we wtil receive that for Sf the which we hope, the conviction of the reaUty of those things power which we do not see. It was for this that the men of olden faith time were attested. Through faith we understand that the ( "} world was fashioned by the word of God so that what is seen was made out of the invisible. 252 THE POWER OF ABEL'S FAITH By faith Abel offered God a more acceptable sacrifice Abel than Cain and thus was attested to be righteous. For God w gave the attestation by accepting his gifts and through this faith, though dead, he still speaks. By faith Enoch was taken to heaven, so that he did not Enoch die and could not be found, because God had taken him (6'6) away. For before he was taken to heaven he was attested to be weU pleasing to God; but without faith it is impos sible to be weU pleasing to him, for the man who draws near to God must beUeve that he doth exist and that he doth reward those who earnestly try to find him. By faith Noah, after having been taught by God about Noah things still unseen, reverently constructed an ark to save (,) his household; thus he condemned the world and became heh of the righteousness that depends on faith. By faith, Abraham obeyed, when he was called to go Abra^ forth to a place which he woitid receive as an inheritance, $*£ and he went forth not knowing where he was to go. By "¦") faith he came and made his home in the promised land as in a foreign country, Uving in tents, as did Isaac and Jacob who were co-heirs with him of the same promise. For he was waiting for the city which has the foundations, whose buUder and maker is God. By faith, when Abraham was tested he sacrificed Isaac and was ready to sacrifice his only son, although he had received the promise and had been told, It is through Isaac that your offspring shaU be reckoned ; yet he considered that God was able to raise men even from the dead. By faith, Moses was hidden for three months after bhth Moses by his parents, because they saw that the child was beauti- ("'J,) ful and they did not fear the royal decree. By faith Moses when he had grown up refused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter, preferring to endure til-treatment with God's people rather than to have the passing pleasures of sin, because he considered reproaches with the Messiah to be richer wealth than all the treasures of Egypt; for he was looking for the reward. By faith he left Egypt, not because he feared the king's wrath, for he held on his course as one who saw him who is invisible. By faith he instituted the passover that the destroying angel might not touch the first- 253 THE EARLY CHRISTIAN SERMON IN HEBREWS born of the IsraeUtes. By faith they crossed the Red Sea, as through dry land; but when the Egyptians made the at tempt, they were drowned. Rahab By faith, Rahab, the harlot, did not perish with those who (S1) were disobedient for she had welcomed the spies peaceably. other What more shaU I say ? For time would fail me to tell hero^* of Gideon and Barak and Samson and Jephthah, of David °f.*^e and Samuel and the prophets — they who by faith conquered (««) kingdoms, administered justice, obtained promises, shut the mouths of Uons, quenched the power of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, from weakness were made strong, proved vaUant in war and put to flight foreign armies. Later Women received back some as though raised from the ™l~ dead; others were broken on the wheel, refusing release their *^at ^ev ^S0* secure a better resurrection. Others again faith were tested by scoffs and scourgings; yes, and by chains (M.«) an(j imprisoujngnt They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were tried by temptation, they were killed by the sword. They went about in sheepskins and goatskins, en during want, oppressed, ill-treated (men of whom the world was not worthy), wanderers in the desert and among the htils, in caves and in holes in the ground. Through faith, these aU were attested, but they did not obtain the promise. God had something better in store for us, so that apart from us they were not to attain fuU perfection. There- Therefore, surrounded as we are by such a great crowd brave6 of witnesses, let us lay aside every handicap and the sin, staid which clings so closely to us, and let us run with patient (121-8) endurance our appointed course, fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Pioneer and Perfecter of faith. He, for the sake of the joy which lay before him, patiently endured the cross, looking with contempt upon the shame, and is now seated at the right hand of the throne of God. Therefore consider him who steadily endures aU that hostihty from sinful men, so as to keep your own hearts from fainting and failing. In your struggle against sin you have not yet shed your blood. Have you forgotten the comforting message that reasons with you as with sons? My son, do not think Ughtly of the Lord's discipUne, And do not faint when he correcteth you, 254 COMMAND TO BE BRAVE AND STAND For whom the Lord loveth he disciplineth, And scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. Patiently endure for the sake of discipline, God is deaUng with you as with sons; For where is the son whom his father does not disci phne? And if you are left without that discipline which all share, Then you are not sons but bastards. Moreover, we had our earthly fathers to discipUne us, There- and we yielded to them! Shall we not much more pa- IUbmit tiently submit to the Father of our spirits, and so Uve? js-^ For while theh discipline was only for a time and accord- disci-s ing to theh judgment, he disciplines us for our profit that $5f we may share in his hoUness. AU discipUne seems for the present to be painful not joyous; but to those who are trained by it, it afterwards yields the fruit of peace and righteousness. Therefore, strengthen your drooping hands and weak knees and make straight the paths for your feet, so that what is lame may not be dislocated but rather be made whole. Persistently strive for peace with aU men and for that Avoid consecration without which no man will ever see the Lord, b^- CarefuUy guard lest anyone misses the grace of God, that Riding no root of bitterness grow up to trouble you and through it many be denied ; also that there be no fornicator or un godly person Uke Esau, who for a single meal parted with his birthright. For you know how, when later on he wanted to secure the blessing, he was set aside, for he found no opportunity to repent, though he sought it earnestly with tears. For you have not come to what you can touch, to flaming The fire, to gloom and darkness and to storm and the blare of £°ast the trumpet, and the sound of words, such that those who ^een heard it begged that no more should be added (for they the old could not bear the command, If a beast touches the moun- new*he tain it must be stoned). So terrible was the sight that even cove- Moses said, I am terrified and trembling. Rather you (S>> have come to Mount Sion, the city of the Uving God, the heavenly Jerusalem, to myriads of angels, to the festal 255 THE EARLY CHRISTIAN SERMON IN HEBREWS gathering, and to the assembly of the first-born whose names are recorded in heaven, to the spirits of righteous men made perfect, to Jesus who mediates the new cove nant, and to the sprinkled blood which speaks a nobler message than Abel's. There- See to it that you do not refuse to Usten to him who is obredi-e speaking to you, for h they who refuse to Usten to theh !°^° earthly instructors fail to escape, how much less shaU we divine escape if we turn a deaf ear to him who speaketh from (£3?)ter heaven. Then God's voice shook the earth, but now he promiseth, saying, Once again I will cause not only the earth but the heavens to quake. The phrase 'once again' denotes the removal of those things which can be shaken as created things, in order that those things only which cannot be shaken may remain. Therefore, let us render thanks that we are receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken, and in this way let us worship God acceptably with godly reverence and awe, for our God is indeed a consuming fire. jesus, Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, to-day and forever. spMt- Do not let yourselves be drawn aside by aU sorts of strange OTe£nd teachings, for it is weU to have one's heart strengthened lasting by God's grace and not by special kinds of food which have fl^n" never been of any use to those who scrupulously attend to (is815) them. We have an altar from which the worshippers at the Jewish tabernacle have no right to eat. For the bodies of those animals whose blood is taken by the high priest into the holy place as a sin offering are burned outside the camp. And for this reason Jesus also suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify the people by his blood. There fore, let us go to him outside the camp, sharing his reproach, for we have no lasting city here below, but we seek for tiie city to come. Through him, then, let us constantly offer to God our sacrifice of praise, namely, the fruit of tips which make confession in his name. Bene- Now may the God of peace, who brought up from the dead (Krf1 our Lord Jesus, who by the blood of the eternal covenant is the great Shepherd of the sheep, fuUy equip you with every good thing that you may do his wtil, creating in us, through Christ Jesus, what is acceptable in his sight. To him be the glory for ever and ever. Amen. 256 THE LITERARY FORM OF HEBREWS I. The Literary Form of the Epistle to the Hebrews. In its literary form and thought the so-called "Epistle to the Hebrews" stands in solitary grandeur among New Testament writings. Its only kinsmen are the speeches of Peter, Stephen, and Paul reported in Acts. It was evidently written by a Greek Christian. Its involved, often redundant sentences reveal the student rather than the man trained in the active stream of life. Its traditional title and the personal notes in the last chapter give it the semblance of an epistle; but there can be little doubt that it was originally addressed by word of mouth to a definite assembly of Christians, for it has aU the char acteristics of a sermon. It is faultlessly constructed as an oration according to the canons of the Greek rhetoricians. The impressive introduction is found in V~413. The formal argument, which develops the thought that Jesus is our great high priest who enables us to enter the divine presence with confidence, is presented in 413-1031. The ideas are here prevailingly expressed in the first person. The short passage, IO32"39, marks the sharp transition to the direct personal ap pUcation. The pronoun "you" henceforth takes the place of "we." The examples of the men of faith who have endured sufferings are massed impressively and dramaticaUy in chapter 11. The general izations, the logical conclusions, and the practical exhortations foUow in 121"29 and 13*"15. The elaborate benediction, which furnishes the appropriate conclusion to this noble sermon, is found in 1320, 21. The indications that the contents of this epistle were first presented to an audience within the physical as weU as the mental vision of the preacher are many. In 5U, for example, when he began to develop the intricate allegory of "the high priest with the rank of Melchizedek," some of his audience may weU have yawned. With the intuitions of the true preacher he felt that their interests were suddenly relaxed, for he adds: "On this point I have a great deal to say which it is hard to make clear to you, for you have grown dull of hearing." Indeed, there is a trace of impatience in his words: "You stiU need someone to teach you once more the elementary principles of the divine revelation. You are in need of milk not of solid food!" But in the next paragraph he recovers his buoyant optimism and probably also the attention of his audience: "Let us go on then to what is mature, leaving elementary Christian doctrine behind." In ll32 he exclaims: "Time would fail me to teU of Gideon" and the other heroes of the faith. It is the preacher, not the writer, who feels the imperative limitations of time. The bonds of sympathy and interest between the speaker and his 257 THE EARLY CHRISTIAN SERMON IN HEBREWS audience were evidently very close. He constantly addresses them as "beloved" or as "brothers." In IO32"34 he asks them to "recaU the former days when, after you were enlightened, you endured a hard struggle and much suffering." He goes on to speak of the reproaches which they endured, of their sympathy for those who were in prison, and of the cheerfulness with which they bore the confiscation of their possessions. Here we listen to a pastor praising and exhorting mem bers of the flock which he has led through much tribulation and which is again facing persecution. As several scholars have observed, the personal notes in 131"7' 16"19' 22"24, destroy the otherwise close-knit unity of the book (cf. Torrey, Journal of Bib. Lit., XXX, 137-156). The interest, the vocabulary, and the literary style are fundamentaUy different from those which characterize the rest of the sermon. It is exceedingly probable that the notes were later added to this address in order to give it the appearance of an epistle and to imply that it came from the great apostle to the GentUes. The reference to brother Timothy and the salutation from the ItaUans support the inference without definitely stating that what preceded was written by Paul from Rome. II. The Authorship and History of Hebrews. Notwithstand ing the implication of the personal notes in chapter 13, the Pauline authorship of Hebrews was early questioned, even by the church at Rome. That he is not its author is now almost universally recognized. WhUe Hebrews has many points of contact with Paul's epistles, its thought moves on an entirely different level. Its author was a theo logian, a finished orator, and a master of the Greek idiom. He was acquainted with the writings of PhUo and the Alexandrian type of thought. The early conflict between Jew and GentUe had completely disappeared from his horizon. AU the institutions and events of Old Testament history were to him but prophetic types of heavenly and future realities. He adopted without question the apostoUc teaching that the Christians were the seed of Abraham (216) and the true people of God (49). He quotes at length from the Greek version of the Old Testament, and his quotations are very exact, but he fol lows guilelessly the mistakes of the Greek translators. Like most of the apostles, he regards the Old Testament primarUy as a coUection of predictions regarding Jesus and the triumphant progress of Chris tianity. As has been truly said, the author is "a man of deep sincer ity and great richness of soul." His interest in Christ, however, is more inteUectual and not so personal as Paul's. For him Christ is 258 AUTHORSHIP AND HISTORY the great high priest who has made it possible for his followers to at tain forgiveness of their sins and direct access to God. And yet the author of Hebrews has an intensely practical rather than a merely theological interest. He was endeavoring to inspire and help his fellow Christians who were facing bitter persecution. In the latter part of the famous eleventh chapter he apparently has in mind the persecutions of Nero in 64, as well as the earher attempt of Antiochus Epiphanes to wipe out Judaism. When he spoke, these events lay in the distant past. The persecutions which he immediately faced were probably those under Domitian. A date about 85 a.d. also satisfies in every respect the Uterary relationships of Hebrews. Its use by Clement of Rome about 100 fixes its origin in the first century. Alex andria at this time undoubtedly had a large Christian community and this strongly Grasco-Roman city furnishes the most natural background for the original sermon contained in Hebrews. Either by chance or definite intention it was carried in time to Rome. Its high intellectual and spiritual values undoubtedly from the first gave it an accepted position in the rapidly growing coUection of early Christian writings. When later in the second Christian century the New Testament canon was beginning to be definitely fixed, Hebrews lacked but one thing and that was the apostoUc (Pauline) authority which, by implication, the personal notes in 13 supply. It is probable that by the middle of the second century Hebrews was current in its present form and had won its place side by side with the other New Testament epistles. IH. The Aim of the Sermon in Hebrews. Pliny's famous letter to Hadrian makes clear the perU which the author of Hebrews was seekingjto avert. The Roman governor teUs of many who were or had been Christians, who at his dictation prayed to the gods and made suppUcation with incense and wine to the emperor's statue, which Pliny had ordered to be brought into the court for this pur pose. He also says: "In addition to this they cursed Christ, none of which things, it is said, those who are reaUy Christians can be made to do." In 6U' n the author of Hebrews states his aim: "It is my earnest desire that each of you should show his zeal to realize your full hope to the very end, so that instead of being slack you may imitate those who inherit the promises by their unswerving faith." His purpose is to strengthen the faith of the Christians so that they wUl hold fast to it amidst the trying temptations and persecutions that impend. AU of his thought and teaching are focused on this definite end. In this respect the epistle of I Peter and Hebrews are in close accord. 259 THE EARLY CHRISTIAN SERMON IN HEBREWS1 They are probably the outgrowth of the same great struggle. In preserving the faith of Christendom during this severe ordeal they each performed an inestimable service. IV. The Theme and the Development of the Thought of Hebrews. The text from which the sermon in Hebrews was preached was apparently taken from Jeremiah 3131. It is quoted not at the beginning but in the heart of the sermon (810) : This is the covenant I wUl make with the house of Israel; I will set my laws within their mind, And I wUl inscribe them upon their hearts, I wUl be a God to them, And they shall be a people to me. The author's thesis is that Christ, superior to all other agents sent by God to man, is the culmination of aU preceding revelation and the one who has established the new and everlasting covenant between God and the individual. In 122 he describes Jesus as the Pioneer and Perfecter of our faith. The foundations of this sermon are the primitive Christian beliefs and the teachings of Paul. To these are added the distinctive contributions of the Alexandrian type of thought. While there are few traces of rabbinical influence, there are many points of contact with the noble homily in IV Maccabees which at about the same period was either preached as a sermon or sent out as a general epistle. Possibly both emanate from Alexandria. Both accept the belief in atonement for sin. This doctrine was in fact a fixed tenet of contemporary Judaism. In both of these homilies faith is conceived of, not in the Pauline sense of mystical feUowship with God, but as a behef in the providential rulership of the world (cf. IV Mac. 1524, 1622). Both also iUustrate their teachings by the example of the Old Testament heroes. To a modern reader the first, the doctrinal part of the sermon in Hebrews, is the least convincing. The picture of the exalted Christ in the opening paragraphs undoubtedly represents the beliefs of a majority of the Christian church at the close of the first century. Already the roots of this doctrine have been traced through Paul and the early apostles back to the Jewish apocalypses. The author of Hebrews has evidently arrived at the same beliefs by a different way. Following the Alexandrian teachers and especially PhUo, who inter preted the entire Old Testament allegorically, he drew chiefly from the Psalms the proofs of Jesus' divine nature. The present age is par- 260 THEME AND DEVELOPMENT OF THOUGHT ticularly impatient with the use of proof texts, especially when they are torn from their context and given an interpretation entirely foreign to that in the mind of the original writer. Thus, for example, in l10"12 he quotes from Psalm 10226-27, which was clearly addressed to Jehovah, for the original psalm begins in a: Thou, Jehovah, art enthroned forever, And thy fame is to all generations. As uniformly in the Greek tert (which the author of Hebrews fol lowed) "Jehovah" was translated "Lord." This fact alone explains his interpretation of the psalm as a description of Christ's character and creative work. The passage is significant because it throws clear hght on one of the ways in which the creed of the later church de veloped. It also explains why there is such a vast difference between the simple, vivid picture of Jesus in the Synoptic Gospels and the elaborate Christology of these later writers. Throughout the opening chapters of Hebrews the logic is largely that of the Alexandrian al legorical school, which was inclined to find a symbohc meaning in every Old Testament phrase and figure. Even though the author of Hebrews feared that his audience might fah asleep in the process, he developed at length his aUegory regarding Melchizedek, the king of Salem, finding in the meaning of each of these titles symboUc sugges tions of the character and work of the future Messiah. To his hearers, however, this aUegorical method of interpretation was undoubtedly as convincing as that of the modern biblical interpreter is to the present generation. In estimating the permanent value of Hebrews, it is important to remember that the author's aim was not doctrinal but practical. In describing the character and work of Jesus he used the terms and figures which were most intelhgible and impressive to his hearers. The conclusion of his doctrinal introduction is found in IO19"31. Its great central teaching is in perfect harmony with the teaching of Paul and the gospel narratives, and is as true as it is sig nificant: Jesus by his work has rendered unnecessary all the compli cated rites which were associated with the ancient covenant and has made it possible for each individual to enter into personal, intimate feUowship with God himself. The thought in the remamder of the sermon moves on a high inteUectual and spiritual plane. The au thor's noble array of the heroes of the faith has been the inspiration of millions of tried and tempted souls through the ages. With the true instincts of the preacher he has included women as weU as men in 261 THE EARLY CHRISTIAN SERMON IN HEBREWS this Ust. Even Rahab, the harlot, rises to bear testimony to the power of faith to transform a wasted, impure life. Faith, as thus concretely defined, is not only intellectual belief but trust and loyalty expressed in life and acts. Thus it is that our author supplements Paul's mystical, though more spiritual conception of faith, and imparts to it a practical, kinetic quality. V. The Charm and Power of Hebrews. Undoubtedly the sermon in Hebrews brought conviction and inspiration to the perse cuted Christians who first heard it. It has also contributed much to the beliefs of the Christian church. It is tc-day one of the ten or twelve great books of the New Testament. Its charm Ues not merely in its majestic rolling sentences. Its power is certainly not dependent upon its logic. Unlike many of Paul's epistles, its appeal is not pri marUy to the emotions. Its charm and power he rather in its dauntless, courageous spirit and in the marveUously effective way in which the author has rallied the forces which engender faith and steadfast en durance in the presence of temptation and trial. It is interesting to analyze these forces. The first is Christ's triumphant exaltation and his superiority to angels and men. The second is his sympathy with our trials and temptations, for he himself has shared them. The third is his supreme achievement in having made access to and feUow ship with God possible and easy for every individual, however bur dened with sins. The fourth is that he has swept away the cumber some forms of the old covenant and estabhshed a new and simpler relation between God and man. The fifth is that the Christian, if he proves faithless, will forfeit thereby all hope for the future. The sixth is that past experience has shown that Christ's followers have the power to endure even the most terrible trials and persecutions. The seventh is the inspiring example of the long list of heroes who, through faith, have achieved. The eighth is the supreme example of Jesus himself. Thus the ultimate charm and power of Hebrews Ue not in its theology nor its rhetoric but in its abUity to inspire heroic, self- sacrificing faith in God and undying loyalty to the principles of Jesus. §CLXVTI. THE VISIONS OF THE ULTIMATE VICTORY OF The CHRISTIANITY IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION po^e A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God granted him ?lvliL that he might make known to his servants what must tion quickly come to pass. He disclosed it by sending it through iS)v' his angel, to his servant John, who bore witness as to what is 262 THE PURPOSE OF REVELATION the Word of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ, even to what he saw. Blessed is he who reads and blessed are they who hear the words of this prophecy and lay to heart the things which are written in it, for the time is near. John to the seven churches in the province of Asia. May Greet- grace be granted to you and peace from him who is and ^Es.) was and is forevermore, and from the seven spirits before his throne and from Jesus Christ who is the faithful wit ness, the first-born from the dead and the ruler of the kings of the earth. To him who loves us and who has freed us from our sins Ascrip- by bis own blood and made us a Kingdom, to be priests to p°5sef bis God and Father, to bim be glory and power for ever and ^bIist ever. Amen. Lo, he is coming on the clouds and every («>-s) eye wtil see him, even those who pierced him, and the tribes of earth wtil mourn over him. Even so. Amen. I am the Alpha and the Omega, saith the Lord God, he who is and was and is forevermore the Almighty. On the Lord's day I was in the Spirit, and I heard a loud The voice behind me Uke a trumpet calling, Write what you see mSia in a book and send it to the seven churches. *° To the angel at the church at Ephesus write: I know your (^"»> deeds, your toti and your patient endurance. 'And I know The that you cannot tolerate wicked men and that you have fo^e tested those who called themselves aposties but are not Ephe- and have found them to be tiars. And I know that you are ^L. enduring patiently and have borne up for my sake and 7) have not grown weary. Yet I have this against you: you have given up your first love. Let anyone who has ears Usten to what the Spirit says to the churches : To him who overcomes I will grant to eat from the tree of Ufe which is in the paradise of God.' To the angel of the church at Smyrna write: These are Tothe the words of the Fhst and Last, he who is dead and has ^mch returned to Ufe: 'I know your distress and poverty (but smyr- you are rich!). I know how you are being slandered by (s-"> those who caU themselves Jews and are not, but are a mere synagogue of Satan. Do not fear what you are about to suffer. The devil, indeed is going to throw some of you into prison, that you may be tested, and for ten days you wtil 263 VISIONS IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION To the church at Per- gamtm (12, is) To the churchat Thy atira (18, 10 15) To the church atSardis (J1-1) To the churchat Phil adelphia (7, 8, 10) have to endure distress. Be faithful even to death and I wtil give you the crown of Ufe. Let anyone who has ears Usten to what the Spirit says to the churches: He who overcomes shaU not be injured by the second death.' To the angel of the church at Pergamum write: These are the words of him who has the sharp, two-edged sword: 'I know where you dweU. Satan's throne is there; and yet you are loyal to my name and have not renounced your faith in me, even in the days of Antipas, my witness and faithful servant, who was put to death among you in the place where Satan dweUs.' To the angel of the church at Thyatha write : These are the words of the Son of God who has eyes Uke a flame of fire and whose feet are Uke burnished brass: ' I know your deeds, your love, your faith, your service, and your patient endurance. I know that of late you are doing more than you did at first. Only hold fast to what you have until I come.' To the angel of the church at Sardis write : These are the words of him who holds the seven spirits of God and the seven stars: ' I know your deeds; you have the name of being ative but are dead. Be watchful, raUy what is stiU left, though it is about to perish; for I have found none of your deeds complete in the eyes of God. Now, re member, those teachings which you have received and heard, hold to them and repent. H you wtil not be watch ful, I wUl come Uke a thief and you wtil not know at what hour I wtil come upon you. Still you have a few names in Sardis of those who have not sotied theh garments. They wtil walk beside me in white, for they are worthy.' To the angel of the church at Philadelphia write : These are the words of the faithful and Holy One who has the key of David, who opens and none shall shut and shuts and none shaU open: ' I know your deeds. See, I have set an open door before you which no one is able to shut, for though you have Uttle strength, you have kept my word, you have not renounced my name. Because you have kept my word through your patient endurance, I wtil keep you safe from the hour of trial which is coming upon the whole world to test the dweUers on earth.' 264 LETTER TO THE CHURCH AT LAODICEA To the angel of the church at Laodicea write : These are To the the words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the ^t Lao- beginning of God's creation: ' I know your deeds; you are *j«» neither cold nor hot — would that you were either cold or »-*>)' hot! So because you are hike-warm, neither hot nor cold, I am going to spit you out of my mouth. I reprove and discipUne those whom I love; therefore be in earnest and repent. Lo, I stand at the door and knock. If anyone Ustens to my voice and opens the door, I wtil come in to him and sup with him and he with me. To bim who over comes I wtil grant to sit beside me on my throne, as I myseh have overcome and sat down with my Father on his throne. Let anyone who has ears Usten to what the Spirit says to the churches.' After this I looked, and there was a door standing open The in heaven. And the first voice which I had heard talking ^oSi with me Uke a trumpet said, Come up here, and I wtil show Jj^gj* you what must come to pass after these things. Immedi- neW- ately I found myseh in the Spirit, and lo, a throne stood in throne heaven and One sitting on the throne who resembled in w'-». appearance jasper and sardius. And around the throne there was a rainbow, resembling emeralds in appearance, and also around the throne were twenty-four other thrones and on these thrones were seated twenty-four elders, clad in white robes with golden crowns upon theh heads. From the throne there come flashes of lightning and peals of thunder, while in front of the throne seven blazing torches are burning, which are the seven spirits of God. And in front of the throne there appears to be a sea of glass, re sembling crystal, and on each side of the throne aU around it are four Uving creatures, full of eyes before and behind. And day and night they never cease saying, Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord God Almighty, Who was and is and ever more shall be. The Then in the midst of the throne and before the Uving ander creatures I saw a Lamb standing among the elders. And $%&> I looked and heard the voice of many angels round the ^j™**. throne and the Uving creatures and the elders, numbering »> 265 VISIONS IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION myriads of myriads and thousands of thousands, crying aloud, Worthy is the Lamb that has been slain to receive power and wealth and wisdom and might and honor and glory and blessing. And I heard every creature in heaven and on earth and under the earth and on the sea and all things that are in them, crying, To him who is seated on the throne and to the Lamb be blessing and honor and glory and dominion for ever and ever. And the four Uving creatures said, Amen. And the elders feU down and wor shipped. The After that I looked, and there was a vast host which no f™te~ one could count, from every nation and tribe and people and aj«i tongue, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, nessse " clad in white robes, with palm branches in theh hands. trium- An(l tnev cfie(l aloud, saying, It is to our God who is seated phant on the throne and to the Lamb that we owe our salvation ! (7»?i?. Then one of the elders addressed me, saying, Who are "¦"¦") these clad in white robes, whence have they come? I said to him, You know, my Lord. So he told me, These are the people who have come out of the great distress and washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb. For this reason they are now before the throne of God and serve him day and night within his temple. He who is sitting on the throne wtil shelter them in his tent; Never again will they be hungry or thirsty, Never again wtil the sun or any scorching heat smite them; For the Lamb in the midst of the throne wtil be theh shepherd, And will guide them to fountains of living water; And God wUl wipe away every tear from theh eyes. The g^°_f Then I saw another angel flying in mid-heaven, with an ofthSse eternal gospel to proclaim to the inhabitants of the earth, who to every nation, tribe, language and people. He cried SSpped aloud, Fear God, give him glory, for the hour of his judgment beLt is come* Worship him who made heaven and earth, the (Hon) sea and the fountains of water. And another, a second 266 THE FATE OF BABYLON angel foUowed, crying, Fallen, fallen is Babylon, the great. She who made aU nations drink the wine of wrath pro voked by her vice ! And then another, a third angel fol lowed these, crying aloud, Whoever worships the Beast and his image or receives a mark on his forehead or on his hand shaU drink the wine of God's wrath which stands ready un mixed in the cup of his fury and shall be tortured with fire and brimstone before the holy angels and the Lamb. And the smoke of theh torture goes up for ever and ever, and they get no rest from it day and night — the worshippers of the Beast and his statue and all who receive the mark of his name. This is what reveals the patient endurance of the saints who keep God's commands and the faith of Jesus ! Then I heard a voice from heaven saying, Write this: The Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord from henceforth ! ^^ Even so, says the Spirit; let them rest from theh labors; ^htvi for what they have done goes with them. Then I saw heaven open wide and there was a white The horse. Its rider was named Faithful and True, and he deemer righteously judges and makes war. His eyes are a flame S'i}f.16. of fire and on his head are many diadems. He has a name inscribed upon him, known to no one but himseh. He is clad in a robe dipped in blood, and his name is the Word of God. The armies of heaven foUow him on white horses, clothed in fine linen, white and spotless. From his mouth proceeds a sharp sword wherewith ito smite the nations, and he will shepherd them with a rod of hon and tread the wine-press with the fierce anger of God Almighty. On his robe and on his thigh his name is written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS And I saw the Beast and the kings of earth and theh The armies assembled to make war on bim who was seated on j^ic. a horse and against his army. But the Beast was seized, Jj1™^ together with tiie false prophet who had done signs before human him by means of which he seduced those who received the ^^ mark of the Beast and worshipped his statue. Both of ("•*¦) them were cast ative into the lake of fire that burns with brimstone, and the rest were killed by the sword which 267 men <21«0 VISIONS IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION came forth from the mouth of bim who was seated on the horse. Final Then I saw a great white throne and One was seated on rection h fr°m whose presence earth and sky fled away and no ajd place was found for them; and I saw the dead, great and ment small, standing before the throne. And the books were (20"-") 0peQ — t^SQ another book, the book of life, was open. And the dead were judged by what was written in these books according to theh deeds. And the sea also gave up its corpses and Death and Hades gave up theh dead; and all were judged according to theh deeds. Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire (this is the second death — the lake of fire). And everyone who was not found enrolled in the book of Ufe was cast into the lake of fire. God> Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first down18 heaven and the first earth had passed away and the sea dweii *s no more* A110- * saw *he Holy City, the New Jerusalem, among coming down from God out of heaven, all ready Uke a bride arrayed for her husband, and I heard a loud voice out of the throne saying, Behold God's dwelling place is with men, And he wifi dweU among them, And they shall be his people. Yea, God himseh will be among them, And he wtil wipe away every tear from theh eyes, And death shall be no more; No sorrow nor wailing nor pain, For the first things have passed away. And he who was seated on the throne said, Behold, I am making all things new ! And he added, Write this: These words are faithful and true. The I saw no temple in the city, p^e For its temple is the Lord Almighty and the Lamb. e™®^ The city has no need of the sun, the Nor of the moon to give it Ught, pSi) For the glory of God illumines it, And the lamp thereof is the Lamb. 268 THE DIVINE PRESENCE By its Ught will the nations walk, And into it wtil the kings of earth bring theh glory. Its gates will never be shut by day, For there wtil be no night there. They wtil bring into it the glory and honor of nations, But nothing unclean shall ever enter it, Nor any one who practises abomination or falsehood, Only those whose names are written in the Lamb's book of Ufe. Then he showed me the river of the water of Ufe, bright The_ as crystal, flowing through the streets of the city from the ancf throne of God and of the Lamb. On both sides of the river $£ of grew the tree of Ufe, bearing twelve kinds of fruit, each (221!) month yielding its own fruit. And the leaves of the tree serve to heal the nations. None who was accursed wtil remain there; The But the throne of God and of the Lamb wtil be in it, orthe And his servants wtil render him holy service, jjgj And they wtil look upon his face, («) And his name wtil be on theh foreheads. And there wtil be no more night there, And they wtil have no need of the Ught of lamp or sun, For the Lord God wtil illumine them; And they wtil reign for ever and ever. Then he said to me, do not seal up the word of the its prophecy of this book, for the time is near. coming (10-16) Let the wicked sttil be wicked, Let the filthy sttil be filthy, Let the righteous sttil do right, Let the holy still be holy. Behold I am coming quickly, And my reward is with me, To reward each one for what he has done. I am the Alpha and the Omega, The Fhst and the Last, The Beginning and the End. Blessed are those who wash theh robes, 269 tion (.«, 17) VISIONS IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION That thehs may be the right to the tree of Ufe, That they may go through the gates into the city. Without are the dogs and the sorcerers, The fornicators, the murderers, and the idolaters, And everyone who loves and practises falsehood. 'rb*,* I. Jesus, have sent my angel to testify these things to world- ' ; r ., ' , , J wide you for the churches. invita- I am the Root and the Offspring of David, The bright, the morning Star. The Spirit and the Bride say, Come, And he who hears, let him say, Come; And let the thirsty come, Whoever will, let him take the water of life freely. I. The Aim of the Book of Revelation. Through the ages the book of Revelation has been the stumbling-block of the realist and the delight of the mystic. Hundreds of volumes have been written interpreting its symbolism. Its magic phrases have been interwoven in Christian hymns and the devotional life of the church; but for the majority of men and women to-day it is a sealed book — sealed so tightly that they pass it by with calm unconcern. It represents the opposite pole of thought from that of the present historical, scientific age. Its literary antecedents are the apocalypses of Ezekiel, Zech ariah, and the closing chapters of Daniel. Its author was a poet and a dreamer; but, like the authors of I Peter and Hebrews, his aim was intensely practical. The hopes, which he clothes in his highly sym bolic visions, were the common property of the primitive church. Paul frequently alluded to them. In the second chapter of II Thes salonians he presents these hopes in detail. The authors of I Peter and Hebrews were constantly reminding their readers that "the end of all is near." These apocalyptic hopes, as have been noted, were a part of their Jewish inheritance. But the attitude of the Graeco- Roman world was also that of expectancy. The greater the prevailing vice and suffering, the more ardently Jew and Gentile hoped and be lieved that a great world upheaval was near. In his preface the author of Revelation states that his purpose was to "show what must soon come to pass." But his aim was not merely to satisfy the curiosity of his fellow Christians; it was to prevent their accepting the false teachings and teachers to which he refers in his opening exhortations 270 THE AIM OF THE BOOK to the seven churches. It was to keep the tempted Christians through out the world from bowing down to the Beast which represented Rome and the emperor-worship. It was to hold up so vividly before them the rewards of future blessedness awaiting the faithful that they would resist persecution even to death. This strange book is saturated with the spirit and the ideals that actuated the early Christian martyrs. It dramatizes the mighty conflict between Christianity and heathen dom. Its appeal is not primarily to the reason but to the emotions. It was well calculated to stir the enthusiasms, to call forth deeds of heroic self-sacrifice, and to buoy up the martyr at the stake. The author, like all the other apocalyptic writers, was also inspired by an ethical aim. In the bitter conflict between Christianity and heathen dom the righteousness of the divine Ruler of the universe was at the stake. Our author, like the immortal poet who has given us the book of Job, asserts his invincible conviction that God is just and good and that he will in the end vindicate, not only his righteous servants, but his own eternal justice. II. The Theme and Literary Character of the Book of Reve lation. In this book we have a stupendous world drama set forth in the form of an epistle. Under the influence of Paul's brilliant example, later Christian authors and editors evidently felt that this was the only acceptable way in which to gain authority and general accept ance for their teachings. The personal notes in the introduction (1-3) and in the epilogue (2218-21) are loosely connected with the rest of the book. After 1-3 the geographical background of the book is not Asia Minor but Palestine. These introductory and concluding notes were apparently added to give to the book the semblance of an epistle. Its theme is Christianity's long and painful struggle with paganism and the organized forces of evil and its ultimate triumph. Revelation also objectifies and dramatizes the great truth that the supreme power at work in the regeneration of human society is the spirit and work of the Christ and the heroic self-sacrifice which he exemplifies and in turn inspires. Such a dramatic foreshortening of history possesses a unique value, for it enables us to see the great historic movements in their genetic relations and in their real significance. The book of Revelation is, therefore, a fitting conclusion to the Bible, which be gins with a description of the creation of the universe and a setting forth of the divine purpose, for it gives a glorious picture of the ultimate realization of that purpose. The book is a composite of dissolving visions, all blended together hke the different motifs in a grand ora- 271 VISIONS IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION torio. Bold figures and strange symbols, with which we have become partially familiar in the Old Testament prophecies and in contempo rary Jewish literature, confront us at every point. The picture of a woman arrayed with the sun, with the moon under her feet, and on her head a crown of twelve stars, seems but the dream of a mere vision ary unless we are acquainted with the literary and intellectual atmos phere which produced it. A leading characteristic of the apocalyptic literature is that historic forces and movements are represented largely by symbols drawn from the animal or natural world. Not only is the imagery exceedingly dramatic, but the action is rapid and on a broad scale. The whole is distinctly impressionistic. It is impossible to visualize many of these pictures notwithstanding their seeming con- creteness. If we could see in our mental vision an objective city of gold with walls of jasper and twelve huge gates, each made of a single pearl, and yet the whole transparent like glass, we would fail com pletely to appreciate the author's purpose. The language is that of mysticism and it speaks almost wholly to the feelings. As the late Professor James has said, in commenting upon these visions: "They stir chords within us which music and language touch in common." in. The Authorship and Date of the Book of Revelation. Another marked characteristic of the apocalyptic writings is that they were all (except the Shepherd of Hermas) published anonymously or rather under the pseudonym of some earlier saint who was supposed to have possessed the power of predicting the future. Thus the score or more of extant Jewish apocalypses are all later than 200 B.C., but bear the names of Enoch, Noah, Daniel, Baruch, and Ezra, who lived long before. From Christian sources comes the Apocalypse of Peter, of which a fragment has recently been discovered. Although at one period it nearly gained a place in the New Testament canon, it is now universally recognized as pseudonymous. It is probable that the book of Revelation is no exception to this otherwise universal rule. The account in Mark ll37- 38 of a request of the disciples James and John that they be allowed to sit one on Jesus' right hand and the other on his left in his glory, reveals an apocalyptic interest which would naturally lead a later Christian writer to single out these two disciples as the most natural medium for revelations regarding the future. The early death of the apostle James was a well-known fact of primitive Christian history. The martyrdom of his brother John, though clearly implied by the early traditions, was not so firmly es tablished. Hence he who was Jesus' favorite disciple would most 272 AUTHORSHIP AND DATE naturally be selected from the Twelve as the one to whom to ascribe later visions. That he is the author of the book of Revelation is not clearly stated but strongly implied in its opening chapters. The possibility, of course, remains that it was the work of another John. John, the presbyter of Ephesus, is held by many scholars to be its author. It is probable that the book was written in Ephesus, but the internal evidence is decisive that it is not from the same author that wrote the Fourth Gospel. The language and idioms of the two books are fundamentally different. Revelation is an Hebraic writing tran scribed rather than translated into popular, Hellenistic Greek. As Dionysius, bishop of Alexandria in the middle of the third century, says, after describing the distmctive characteristics of the Gospel of John: "Utterly diverse and strange is the apocalypse in comparison with all this, hardly touching or even approximating to any of these things, having no common relation to them." The God of Revelation is not the loving Father of the Fourth Gospel but a majestic King sitting in solemn state to receive the homage of his human subjects. Very different also is the portrait of Jesus. In the book of Revelation the note of love is almost lacking. It reverses the words of Jesus in John 1515: "I call you servants no longer. ... I call you friends." The indications that the book was written near the close of the first Chris tian century are cumulative. It probably contains fragments of an earlier Christian apocalypse coming from the reign of Nero, but it also reflects the popular belief, current in the latter part of the century, that Nero, the arch persecutor of the Christians, had again come back to life and was instigating a new and more horrible persecution (17s). The dark and ominous horizon revealed in this book has all the char acteristics of the latter part of the reign of Domitian. Then not only the Christians of Rome but all throughout the empire were ex posed to constant temptation and many to active persecution. The Beast and his statue, which had many worshippers (cf. 14u), are ap parently but veiled allusions to Domitian and to his vigorous campaign against all Christians who refused publicly to acknowledge his divine authority. The book of Revelation, therefore, may with reasonable confidence be attributed to an otherwise unknown Christian prophet who wrote about 95 B.C., and like the writers of the Gospel and epistles of John belonged to the Johannine school, who were strongly influenced by John, the presbyter of Ephesus. IV. The Contents and Sources of Revelation. The general divisions of the book of Revelation are obvious. Chapters 1-3 contain 273 VISIONS IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION letters to seven important churches in the province of Asia. In 41- ll13 are found preliminary visions of coming judgment. Chapters ll14-2015 describe in vivid apocalyptic form the overthrow of Rome and of Satan. The culmination of the book is a description, in 21, 22, of the new and heavenly reign which is to be instituted on earth when the preliminary work of destruction has been completed. Into the body of the book have been woven many older apocalypses and apoca lyptic themes, but they all lead up to one grand, final crescendo. Thus, for example, the vision in 4 of Jehovah seated high on his throne, guarded by four beasts, each with six wings, who cry, "Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty," is an expansion of Isaiah's magnificent vision (recorded in Isaiah 6). The Old Testament student also rec ognizes in the succeeding visions the four living beings of Ezekiel 1, the four horns of Zechariah 1; in 14, vivid descriptions of the day of judgment drawn from Zephaniah and Joel. The glowing picture of the New Jerusalem is suggested by Isaiah 49-54. The figures and symbols of Daniel 7-12 also reappear at many points. In Revelation 11-13 and 18 there are traces of older Jewish apocalypses, which have been only slightly revised and adjusted to their new Christian setting. Thus, for example, the command in ll1- 2 "to rise up and measure the temple of God and the altar" strongly implies that this was first written before the destruction of the Jewish temple in 70 a.d. Furthermore, in the symbolism there are unmistakable traces of older Babylonian and Persian myths. The sun and moon and the five planets are probably to be identified with the seven astral deities of the Baby lonian pantheon. Corresponding to these are the seven spirits in l4 and the seven angels in 82. The huge red dragon, with its seven heads and seven horns and seven diadems upon its heads, which "with his tail swept away a third of the stars of heaven and flung them to the earth," probably represents the later Jewish version of the old Baby lonian story of Tiamat, personified chaos, that contended against the gods. In Revelation 12, "that old serpent is called the Devil and Satan, the seducer of the whole earth." He is overthrown by the angels of heaven, led by Michael, who in the book of Daniel figures as Israel's patron angel. V. The Interpretation of the Book of Revelation. Inter preters of Revelation are divided into two distinct groups. The first includes those who disregard the fact that a fundamental characteristic of the apocalyptic type of literature is the presentation of past and present history as though it were still future. Therefore, they regard 274 ITS INTERPRETATION the visions as predictions yet to be fulfilled and interpret them liter- alistically. The second group interpret the visions in the light of the conditions that obtained during the first Christian century and seek to find the underlying principles which they illustrate. The first group rarely agree in their detailed interpretations, for they ignore the historical background and are guided almost wholly by ingenious con jecture. Their followers are usually of the mystical, enigmatical type of mind that scorns scientific methods of research. The second group follow the only method that promises to give a true understanding of the thought and purpose of the original writer. The selection of seven churches is probably because seven is a part of the prevailing sym bolism of the book. The churches mentioned first are situated in the three leading cities along the eastern Mgean. The order is from south to north: Ephesus, Smyrna, and Pergamum; then from north to south, including representative inland towns. Each of these churches had on the whole proved faithful. The allusion to "Satan's throne" is probably due to the fact that Pergamum was the old capital of the province of Asia and was therefore the traditional centre of the emperor- worship. Since 29 B.C. it had also had a flourishing temple dedicated to Augustus or Rome. Chapters 4-6 contain the impressive introduction to the great world drama. In 5 the Almighty is pictured, seated on his throne, attended by angels and worshipped by the representatives of the church. In 5 the figure of the "Lion of the tribe of Judah and the Scion of David" looms up impressively. He proves to be none other than "the Lamb that seemed to have been slain." This unique description of the Messiah is evidently taken from Isaiah 537 ("as a lamb that is led to the slaughter"). In 6 the agents of death appear. In these opening chapters the poet brings out with great dramatic effectiveness the tremendous contrast between the bitter conflict that was then raging and that was destined to rage between the church and the empire, and the peace and majesty in heaven above. Chapter 7, which represents a digression from the main theme, introduces another element of con trast, for it gives an anticipatory vision of the countless hosts of the servants of God. It is evidently introduced to give the reader an assurance of the ultimate outcome of the great conflict. The recurrence of the number seven gives a certain literary unity to the book. Not only are there seven letters to seven churches from the seven spirits before the divine throne, but the scroll which con tains the record apparently of the sins of mankind is sealed by seven 275 VISIONS IN THE BOOK OF REVELATION seals. At the breaking of each of these seals a new judgment is visited upon the earth. The breaking of the seventh seal (81_s) is the prelude to the blowing of seven trumpets that announce the world judgment. Each blast introduces one of the natural portents, which were associ ated in apocalyptic thought with the end of the world. The blowing of the sixth trumpet marked the destruction of Jerusalem (ll1-14). With the blowing of the seventh trumpet, the scene is transferred temporarily from earth to heaven. This last blast inaugurates the titanic struggle between the hosts of good and evil. Here the author weaves in many of the figures of the old mythology and it is difficult to be absolutely sure of his meaning at every point. Chapter 12 is the most difficult in the book. The people of promise, of whom the Christians are the lineal heirs, is apparently represented by the woman clad in the sun with the moon under her feet. The male child to whom she gives birth, who is to "shepherd all the nations with an iron flail and who was caught up to God and to his throne," is clearly the Mes siah or Lamb whose victorious role is later described. The first of the two Beasts, which emerge in 13, represents Rome and the emperor- worship; the second Beast her zealous provincial priesthood that had "every one put to death who would not worship the statue of the Beast and obliges all men low and high, rich and poor, freemen and slaves alike, to have a mark put upon their right hand or forehead so that no one can buy or sell unless he bears the mark, that is the name of the Beast." The cipher 666 is the total of the numerical values represented by the Hebrew letters of the name Csesar Neron (k = 100, s = 60, r = 200, n = 50, r = 200, w = 6, and n = 50; making 666). This identification is confirmed by the fact that in the old Latin version, where Nero is written without the final n (which equals 50), the number is 616, representing again the exact total of the Hebrew letters. Chapter 141-5 is another of those marvellous digressions which stir the imagination and hope of the reader and anticipate the final victory recorded in 21 and 22. In 146"20 the theme of judgment is again taken up, and in 14-20 the final judgment recorded in the succeed ing chapters is anticipated. In lS1-^1 the scene is transferred again to earth. The seven angels with seven bowls represent the seven plagues which are poured out upon earth. Again the seventh is the culmination. This last bowl is emptied upon Rome, the woman with seven heads, which represented the seven hills on which she was seated and the seven kings who ruled over her (179' 10). The eighth head is apparently to be identified with Domitian. The ten horns 276 ITS INTERPRETATION possibly stand for the angelic being which will fight for her at the great final conflict. The vivid description of the overthrow of Rome in 18 was largely suggested by the II Isaiah's lament over fallen Baby lon (Isaiah 47), and that of Ezekiel over Tyre (Ezek. 26, 27). Chapter 191-10 contains another of the wonderful anticipatory visions of the certain vindication of the faithful. It furnishes an effective contrast to the powerful description of the final overthrow of the Beast and of Satan in 19u-2016. The culminating scene of this tremendous drama (211-2217) is one of the most poetic and powerful passages in literature. Here all the noblest promises found in the Old Testament prophets are presented in one stupendous, concrete picture. The underlying thought is that after all the evil in the earth has been swept away by the purifying fires of judgment, God himself will come to dwell among his faithful people and to satisfy their every want. Jew and Gentile will share alike in the privileges of this ideal commonwealth in which "nothing unclean shall enter, nor any one who practises abomination or false hood." Like Paul, the author of Revelation is endeavoring to portray objectively the ideal of the Kingdom of God, the community of the morally and socially redeemed, that Jesus held up before his followers. It is this picture of the perfect social state, as the final goal of creation, which gives to the book its perennial value for all generations. §CLXVm. THE CHRISTIAN WISDOM OF THE EPISTLE OF JAMES James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ to Greet- the twelve tribes in the dispersion, greeting. ™lmes Count it as pure joy, my brothers, whenever you find >') yourselves hedged about by various trials. Be sure that The the testing of your faith produces endurance ; only let your Jesting endurance be a finished product that you may be perfect and faith complete, lacking in nothing. If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask God who giveth to aU men Uberally and without reproach, and it shaU be given him. Only let him ask in faith, with never a doubt; for the man who doubts is tike a surge of the sea driven and tossed by the wind. Let not that man think that from the Lord he wtil receive anything, double-minded that he is, unstable in aU his ways. Let a brother of low position rejoice when he is raised up ; 277 (2-8) real nature oftemp- THE CHRISTIAN WISDOM IN JAMES The but also let one who is rich rejoice in being brought low, Ey for he wtil pass away Uke the flower of the grass, for the sun Sches r*ses w*ta tne scorcnmg wind and the grass withers, its ("»)"* flower drops off, and the beauty of its appearance perishes. So shaU the rich fade away in the midst of theh undertakings. The Happy is the man who endures under trial; for when he has stood the test he wtil receive the crown of Ufe which is promised to all who love God. Let no one say, when he is taSSn being tried by temptation, I am being tempted by God; for (I215) God is incapable of being tempted by evil and he tempts no one. Everyone is tempted as he is carried away and lured by bis own deshe; then deshe conceives and bears sin and when sin is fuUy matured it gives birth to death. Gods My beloved brothers, do not be deceived: every gift is {jjjfy good and every endowment is perfect, coming down from f2°8) above, from the Father who is the source of all love, with whom there is no variation nor shadow of change. In ac cordance with his own wtil he brought us forth by the word of truth, in order that we might be a kind of first- fruits among his creatures. The Know this, my beloved brothers. Therefore, let every sily'tf man be quick to hear, slow to speak, slow to be angry; for control numan anger does not lead to what God regards as right. (isa) So ridding yourselves of aU that is vile and of the evti that abounds, receive humbly the message implanted within you which is able to save your souls. of _ Act on the word instead of merely hearing it and deluding ence11" yourselves. For, if any one hears but does not act, he is (22-25) ]jke a man wj10 i00]jS at bis natural face in a mirror, for he looks at himseh, goes off and at once forgets what he was like. But he who looks intently at the perfect law of free dom and continues looking, proving himseh to be no forget ful hearer, but an active doer, wtil be blessed in his activity. The H any one thinks he is reUgious and does not bridle his essence tongue but deceives himseh, his reUgion is worthless. The $Ff™5 reUgion that is pure and stainless in the sight of God the Fattier is this: to care personaUy for orphans and widows in theh trouble and to keep oneself unspotted from the world. My brothers, as you beUeve in our Lord Jesus Christ, who 278 THE DEMOCRACY is our glory, do not show favoritism. For suppose a man True comes into one of your meetings, wearing gold rings and fac%oc" handsome clothes, and there also comes in a poor man in (21 -•) dirty clothes. If you attend to the one who wears hand some clothes and say, Sit here, this is a good place, and say to the poor man, Stand there, or Sit at my feet, are you not making distinctions among yourselves and judging people with wrong standards? Listen, my beloved brothers, hath not God chosen the poor of this world to be rich in faith and to inherit the Kingdom which he has promised to those who love him? Yet you insult the poor man. Is it not the rich who lord it over you and themselves drag you into law courts? Is it not they who revtie the noble name you bear? If, however, you are fulfilling the royal law according to scripture, which says, You must love your neighbor as your self, you are doing weU; but if you show partiaUty you are committing sin and are convicted by the law as offenders. For whoever obeys the law as a whole, but makes a single The stip is guilty of everything. For he who said, Do not com- {Jt^'of mit adultery, also said, Do not kill. Now, h you do not com- commit adultery but do kill, you have transgressed the law. obedi- Speak and act as those who are to be judged by the law of (SS) freedom; for a merciless judgment wtil be meted out to him who shows no mercy; but mercy triumphs in the face of judgment. What use is it, my brothers, if a man says he has faith The and yet has no works? Can his faith save him? Suppose offtith a brother or a sister is til-clad or lacks daily food, and one ^^- of you says to them, Depart in peace ; be warmed and weU works fed, but does not give them what theh body needs, what c""18) use is that? So faith without deeds is dead in itseh. But some one wtil say, You have faith ! Yes, and I have deeds as weU. You show me your faith without works and I wiU show you by works what faith is ! You beUeve hi one God? You are quite right; evti spirits also beUeve and shudder. My brothers, let not many become teachers, for you know The that we teachers shall be subjected to severe judgment. Sty'of We aU make many stips; if any one does not make a sUp ^Sing in speech that man is perfect; he is able to curb his whole «jjj nature. In the case of horses we put the bridles into theh S^6 279 THE CHRISTIAN WISDOM IN JAMES mouths to make them obey us and so we move the whole of theh bodies. See also the ships; though of great size and driven by stiff winds, they are turned by a tiny rudder, wherever the mind of the steersman wishes. So the tongue is a smaU member of the body, but it can boast of great achievements! See how a Uttle spark may set a vast forest on fire! The tongue also is a fire. It is a world of mischief. The tongue is set among our members, stain ing the whole body and setting fire to the whole chcle of existence and is itseh set on fire by heU. For every kind of beast and bhd, of creeping animals and creatures of the sea may be tamed and has been tamed by mankind; but no man can tame the tongue. It is an incessant evil, full of deadly venom ! With it we bless the Lord and Father, and with it we curse men made in the likeness of God. Blesses and curses come from the same mouth. My brothers, this ought not to be. Does a fountain pour out fresh water and bitter from the same opening? Can a fig tree, my brothers, bear oUves? Or a vine, figs? No more can salt water yield fresh. Noble Who among you is wise and intelUgent? Let him show the^i- by wise conduct that his deeds are inspired by a wise of trae modestv- But if You are cherishing in your hearts bitter wis- jealousy and rivalry, do not speak boastfuUy and falsely $?SJ) against the truth. That is not the wisdom which comes down from above, but it is earthly, sensuous and devtiish. For wherever jealousy and rivalry are there is disorder and every kind of vUe deed. The wisdom from above is fhst of aU pure, then peaceable, forbearing, well-wishing, fuU of mercy, and good fruits, impartial and sincere. For the peacemakers who sow in peace there is a harvest of righteousness. causes What causes wars and contentions in your midst? Is it 1l%fT not from the cravings which are at war in your members? You crave things and yet cannot get them. You envy and covet, yet you cannot obtain your end. You fight and make war; you do not get what you want because you do not ask God for it. You do ask, but you do not receive because you ask with the wicked intent that you may spend it on your pleasures. 280 THE CURSE UPON ILL-GOTTEN RICHES Come now, you rich men, weep and howl over your im- The pending miseries. Your riches are rotting, your clothes are <£S0% moth-eaten, your gold and stiver are covered with rust and ujtten theh rust wtil be evidence against you and it wtil devour riches your flesh Uke fire. You have been storing up treasures (SIJI) in these last days. See the wages due those who have reaped your fields — the wages of which you have defrauded them — are calling out against you and the cries of the har vesters have reached the ears of the Lord of hosts. You have reveUed here on earth and given yourselves to pleasure ; you have fattened yourselves as for the day of slaughter; you have condemned, you have murdered the righteous man who does not resist you. Be patient therefore, brothers, until the Lord arrives. The See how the farmer waits for the precious fruit of the ofthe* earth, waiting patiently over it until it receives the early Lord and latter rain. So you must be patient. Strengthen your hearts, for the coming of the Lord is near. Do not murmur against one another, brothers, lest you be judged. See, the judge is standing at the door! Take, brothers, as an example of fortitude and patience the prophets who have spoken in the name of the Lord. Remember, we call those blessed who patiently endure. You have heard of Job's patient endurance and you have seen the issue of the Lord's deaUng with him, how the Lord is full of compassion and pity. But above aU, my brothers, swear not, neither by heaven To nor by earth, nor by anything else. Let your ' Yes ' be a a50ld simple ' Yes ' and your ' No ' a simple * No,' that you may °»*ns not fall under condemnation. Is any one of you suffering? Let him pray. Is any one The in good spirits? Let him sing praise. Is any one among Zflue you sick? Let him send for the elders of the church and 8jaj™ let them pray over him, anointing him with oU in the name of the Lord. And the prayer of faith wtil restore the sick man, and the Lord wtil raise bim up; even if he has com mitted sins they wtil be forgiven him. So confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another that you may be healed. The prayers of a righteous man exert a powerful influence. Elijah was a man with a nature Uke 281 tunity (19-20) THE CHRISTIAN WISDOM IN JAMES ours; and he earnestly prayed that there might be no rain and for three years and six months there was no rain. Then he prayed again, and the sky gave forth rain and the earth yielded its fruit. The My brothers, if any of you goes away from the truth §h£|" and some one brings bim back, know that he who brings PPiK^r ttie sinner back from the error of his way saves his soul from death and covers a multitude of sins. I. The Literary Form of the Epistle of James. The epistle of James stands unique among the New Testament writers. In liter ary form it resembles more closely the collection of Jesus' sayings found in the so-called "Sermon on the Mount" (Matt. 5-7) than any other New Testament book. Like the proverbs and gnomic essays in Ben Sira and the book of Proverbs, it is a string of pearls loosely strung together and sent forth as an epistle. At many points the author shows intimate familiarity with the writings of the famous old Jewish sage, Ben Sira (e. g., ln, and B. Sir. 318"10). The author's com parison of the words of a teacher to a stream flowing from a fountain is taken from Ben Sira 2430. In 54"6 he evidently had in mind the words of that famous wise man, found in 3432: "He who deprives the hireling of his hire is a shedder of blood." The literary characteristics of the epistle of James are those of the Jewish wisdom literature, which found its later counterparts in the writings of Epictetus and Marcus Aurelius. The thought gathers about certain themes, such as temptation, the value of riches, the use of the tongue, and the relation of faith and works. The themes discussed throughout are those which especially interested the sages and moralists of all ages. The tone is that of a practical, ethical teacher. Fifty-four imperatives are found in the one hundred and eight verses. The style is vivid, the literary -figures fresh and striking, and the illustrations are drawn from nature and every-day life. Although there is a distinctly Jewish coloring, the language is that of a finished Greek writer. There are no traces of the strong Aramaic influence which is clearly apparent in many other New Testament writings. II. The Aim of the Epistle of James. The forceful literary form in which the thought is expressed strongly suggests that this epistle contains teachings which had often been communicated orally before they were committed to writing. In 31 the author plainly states that he was a teacher. Like Ben Sira, his aim was evidently to 282 THE AIM OF THE EPISTLE OF JAMES put in permanent form the most important of his practical teachings. His abrupt ending also recalls that of Ben Sira and the book of Prov erbs. The indications of logical order are more evident in the first part of the book; the latter part contains loosely arranged supplemental teachings. The author's aim was to correct certain false interpreta tions of Christianity that were then current. Paul's doctrine of jus tification through faith had evidently been misinterpreted and mis used by many who claimed, in practice at least, that intellectual be liefs or mystical religious experiences were the essentials in the Christian life, and that their moral acts were relatively unimportant. It is not entirely clear whether the author is taking direct issue with Paul's assertion, for example, in Galatians 2W, " that a man is justified simply by faith in Jesus Christ" or with the misinterpreters of Paul. In any case, it is obvious that the entire aim of the book is practical rather than theological. The author and Paul live in different intel lectual worlds. Evidently the author of the epistle of James was familiar with Galatians, I Cormthians, and Romans, and did not wholly approve of Paul's emphasis on faith in contrast to works; but he had no desire nor intention to enter into a controversy with the great apostle. His chief concern was to deliver the church from the abuses which, in his day, were bringing disgrace upon the name of Christ. In addressing his teachings to "the twelve tribes in the dispersion," it is clear that he was not speaking to Jews but to Christendom. When he wrote it was the universally accepted belief throughout the church that the Christians were the lineal heirs of the chosen people. Like the Jews after the exile, they were scattered widely throughout the world. In the light of his teachings it is also evident that he was addressing not Jews nor the heathen, but backsliding members of the Christian commonwealth and that, as has well been said, his aim was "to hold a mirror before his brethren that they might see their sorry figures and be lastingly ashamed." III. The Authorship and Date of James. The gnomic form of the book and its strong social interest suggest at once a kinship with the teachings of Jesus. The emphasis on law, as opposed to faith, also seems to point to James, the stanch supporter of the Jewish law. He it was who, according to Paul, forced even Peter and Barnabas to recant from the broad position which they had taken in their relation to Gentile Christians (Gal. 212'14). Josephus in his Antiquities (XX, 91) states that Ananus, or Annas, the son of the corrupt high priest of the same name who had been chiefly instrumental in causing the 283 THE CHRISTIAN WISDOM IN JAMES crucifixion of Jesus, succeeded his father in the priesthood. After the death of the procurator Festus he put to death James, the brother of Jesus. Josephus says that this younger Ananus "was a bold man in his temper and very insolent. He also belonged to the se(rt of the Sadducees, who were more rigorous than the rest of the Jews in judging offenders. Accordingly (while Albinus, the new procurator, was still on his way to Judea), he assembled the court of the Sanhedrin and brought before them James, the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, and certain others, and, when he had preferred an accusation against them as breakers of the law, he delivered them to be stoned." Josephus adds that this act did not meet with the approval of the better-minded Jews and that as a result Ananus was speedily removed from the high-priesthood. The date of the death of James, the brother of Jesus, was therefore about 62 A.D., under the reign of Nero. The real cause of his death was probably the fear of the Sadducees lest the Christian doctrine of the Messiah might compromise them with Rome. Symeon, a nephew of Joseph and a cousin of Jesus, was placed at the head of the Christian church in Palestine; but even before the death of James the centre of thought and influence had passed to the Western Church. From the occasional references to James, the brother of Jesus, it is evident that he was a strong character, zealous for the Jewish law and eager to prevent a breach between Christianity and Judaism. In the light of his historical relations to Paul, opposition to the teachings of the great apostle, such as is implied in the epistle of James, might be expected. The date of James's martyrdom would give time for him to become acquainted with the epistles as well as with the teachings of Paul. It is not entirely impossible that some of the teachings of James, the brother of Jesus, have been incorporated in this epistle, but the evidence that he is not its author is overwhelm ing. The practical impossibility that a Galilean peasant, constantly using Aramaic, could write in a rhetorical Greek style, free from all Aramaisms, has long been recognized. The legal emphasis in this epistle is not upon the Jewish law but upon a body of Christian prin ciples which had begun to take definite form near the close of the first Christian century. Not a single reference is found in the epistle to the earlier conflict between Judaism and Christianity. When its author wrote, entirely new problems were on the horizon. Paul's teachings and work are not in the near but remote background. It is practically incredible that a writing coming from the brother of Jesus could have been so completely without personal references to the Master and to 284 AUTHORSHIP AND DATE his teachings as is the epistle of James. Its problems and interests are practically the same as those that figure in the epistle to the Hebrews, in the writings of Clement of Rome, and in the Shepherd of Hermas, which belong to the last two decades of the first and opening years of the second century. The evidence is also reasonably convinc ing that the author was familiar with I Peter. Add to this the peculiar problems with which he is dealing, and the proof becomes cumulative that he was probably a Greek Christian, by the name of James, who wrote from Rome during the closing years of the first or the opening years of the second century. This conclusion is in full accord with the testimony of the superscription, as well as with the contents of the epistle. The earliest church traditions also support this dating. Eusebius placed this epistle among the controverted books. Jerome says that it was probably written by a different James from the brother of Jesus, though it gradually acquired authority. It is not found in the earliest lists of New Testament books, and not until the third century did it gain an established place in the canon. Its place there is probably due to the later belief that it was written by the brother of Jesus; but its contents and contribution to the history of Christian ity amply justify its position in the canon. The New Testament, like the Old, reflects many diverse points of view and beliefs. Not the least of its charms and values is that it presents not merely one but all sides of truth. IV. The Contributions of the Book of James to Developing Christianity. It is evident that this epistle, like all the New Testa ment writings, grew out of practical needs. The author, in his spirit and theme, reminds us in many ways of the old Hebrew prophet Amos. He evidently had a warm heart, but an exceedingly brusque exterior. He was so intent upon making his points that he did not stop to pre sent the other side of the truth which he was emphasizing. In the days of Amos religion had been interpreted as mere conformity to certain ceremonial rites. When the epistle of James was written the danger that threatened Christianity was that faith might be in terpreted narrowly as the mere acceptance of certain doctrines, or as nominal allegiance to its Founder, or as the sharing of certain mystical experiences which failed to transform the individual character or to lead to right acts. Christianity, like Judaism and all great reUgions, faced this peril at the end of the first Christian century, even as it has at many later periods in its history. In sounding a sharp note of warning, this otherwise unknown James has made a large contribution 285 THE CHRISTIAN WISDOM IN JAMES to Christianity. In his interpretation of the principles of Jesus he undoubtedly was not the equal of Paul. The great apostle declared that the first and absolute essential in the Christian life was to estab lish an intimate, spiritual fellowship with God. At the same time, he always affirmed that the fruits of the Spirit, that is, of that genuinely spiritual fellowship with God which he described as faith, were the only certain proofs that a man had this faith. These are precisely the characteristics and the acts for which the author of James was con tending. As we have seen, Paul devoted nearly as much attention to describing and emphasizing these fruits of the Spirit as he did to his analysis of the individual spiritual experience of which they were but the external evidence. The author of James was the forerunner of the modern ethical-cul ture movement. In his emphasis on personal dependence upon God and of unwavering faith he also laid a sound foundation for morals; but he lacked the profound spiritual experience of the great apostle to the Gentiles and therefore the power to interpret Christianity as a whole rather than in its parts. His epistle is not, however, as Luther asserted, "an epistle of straw." It is a noble and practical homily on a text which Jesus himself propounded: "By their fruits you shall know them." It was a strong protest against the tendencies which during the Middle Ages obscured the real essence of Christianity. It is a protest to which Christianity in the present age is listening with results which are most practicable and commendable. At the same time, it is equally important to remember that the epistle of James presents not all but only a part of Christianity. V. The Democracy of the Epistle of James. The historical student of religion naturally classifies many of the tendencies in the epistle of James as Ebionite. Its denunciation of riches, its disparage ment of worldly wisdom, and its emphasis on deeds of mercy are all characteristic tenets of that Palestinian Christian sect. But they are not due to the influence of a particular sect. They are the natural corollaries of the great social principles laid down by Jesus. Like Paul, its author was seeking to define the duties of citizens in the King dom of God. The book of James is the most democratic of all the New Testament writings except the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, which present most fully the teachings of the Master. Simply and concretely James interprets into every-day life Jesus' social teachings and acts, which acknowledge no superiority except that established by service. The resentment which he feels toward the rich who defraud 286 ITS DEMOCRACY those who labor for them is closely akin to Jesus' hot indignation against the grafting high priests who in legalized ways were putting their hands in the pockets of the poor. His vivid picture of the defer ence paid to the rich and the neglect shown to the poor brother (21"9) is unfortunately not entirely inapplicable to certain Christian churches to-day. If the epistle of James had not found a place in the New Testa ment real Christianity would never have been committed so absolutely and irrevocably to practical democracy. It is not "an epistle of straw," but of practical power, for it contributes many important details to the plan of the ideal community, the establishment of which is the goal of Christianity. §CLXK. THE RULE OF LOVE IN THE EARLY CHRISTIAN CHURCH That you may share our feUowship, we now declare to The you that which existed from the very beginning, which ^^ we have heard and which we have seen with our eyes and feiiow- touched with our own hands, namely, the Word of Life. sav The Life has appeared and we saw it and bear witness and iS^aj announce to you that eternal Life which was with the Father and was manifested to us. And our feUowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ. And we are writing these things that our own joy may be complete. This is the message which we heard from the Lord The-w Jesus and now announce to you : God is Ught and in him f^ ' there is no darkness at aU. If we say, We have feUow- S^8' ship with him whtie we walk in darkness, we are lying shipw" and do not act sincerely; but if we walk in the Ught, as he (wo) J is in the Ught, we have feUowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from every sin. If we say we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is so faithful and just that he forgives our sins and cleanses us from aU unrighteousness. If we say we have not sinned, we make him a liar and his word is not in us. My dear children, I am writing this to you that you may The not sin,; but h anyone does sin, we have an advocate with ^^ the Father in Jesus Christ, the righteous. He himseh is gjj- an atoning sacrifice for our sins, though not for ours alone (2>. 9 but also for the sins of the whole world. 287 THE CHRISTIAN RULE OF LOVE The And by this we may be sure that we know him — ii we dence °oey his commands. He who says, I know him, but does ingbr not 0Dey k*8 commands is a tiar and the truth is not in him. Chris- But whoever obeys his word, in him love for God has really (S" reached perfection. By this means we may be sure that we are in him; whoever says he remains in him ought him seh to walk even as he walked. of Beloved, I am not writing you any new command, but an jp^in old command which you have had from the beginning: *^et the old command is the word which you have heard. And (7-u) yet I am writing you a new command, which is realized in him and also in you, for the darkness is passing away and the true Ught is aheady shining. He who says he is in the Ught but hates his brother is sttil in darkness. He who loves his brother remains in the light, and in the Ught there is no stumbling block. But he who hates his brother is in darkness, he is walking in darkness and does not know where he is going, for the darkness is blinding his eyes. The My dear chUdren, I am writing to you because for his com- sake your sins are forgiven. Fathers, I am writing to you of ISve Decause vou know him who has been from the very be- g*.*. ginning. Young men, I am writing to you because you have " } conquered the evti one. Children, I have written to you because you know the Father. Love not the world nor the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, love for the Father is not in him. For aU that is in the world, the cravings of the flesh and the cravings of the eyes and the vainglory of Ufe, belongs not to the Father but to the world. And the world with its cravings is passing away, but he who does the wtil of God remains forever. See what a marvelous love the Father hath bestowed upon us in letting us be called the chUdren of God! And that *bJT" we are' .^or *k*s reason ^e w°fld does not recognize us: dren because it has not known him. Beloved, we are now cbil- (31-8) dren of God, but what we are to be has not been revealed. We do know that when Christ appears, we shaU be Uke him, for we shaU see him as he is. And everyone who has this hope fixed on him keeps himseh pure just as he is pure. Anyone who is born of God does not commit sin, for a 288 Got lovitoward THE CHRISTIANS' LOVE FOR THEIR BROTHERS divine seed remains in bim and he cannot sin because he Then- is born a child of God. By this the chUdren of God and %£e the chUdren of the devU are recognized: anyone who does {iheir not do right is not a child of God nor is he who does not era love his brother. For this is the message you have heard H,' from the very beginning, that you are to love one another. Do not wonder, brothers, that the world hates you. We know that we have passed over from death to Ufe because we love our brothers. He who has no love remains in death. Anyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life remaining in him. We know what love is by this, that Christ laid down his The Ufe for us; so we ought to lay down our Uves for the ™|"of brothers. But if anyone has this world's wealth and sees gMs- his brother in need and restrains his sympathy for him, how love can love for God remain in him. My children, let us show (1,18) our love not in words nor with tips only, but by deed and sincerity. Beloved, let us love one another for love comes from God God is and everyone who loves is born of God and knows God. '5™) He who does not love, does not know God, for God is love. God's love for us has been manifested by his sending his only Son into the world that through him we might Uve. Love consists in this, not in our love for him but in his love for us and in his sending his Son to be an atoning sacrifice for our sins. Beloved, since God so loved us, then we ought to love The one another. No one has ever seen God; but if we love gf00fs one another, then God remaineth in us and the love for him g".^ is perfect within us. By this we know that we remain in man bim and he remaineth in us because he hath given us a <"'21) portion of his own Spirit. And we have seen and bear wit ness that the Father hath sent the Son as a Saviour of the world. Whoever confesses that Jesus is the Son of God, God remaineth in bim and he remains in God, and we our selves know the love God hath for us and we beUeve in it. God is love, and he who remains in love remains in God and God remaineth in him. Love is perfect with us when we have fuU confidence about the day of judgment, for we 289 THE CHRISTIAN RULE OF LOVE are just as he is in respect to this world. In love there is no fear. Instead of that, perfect love drives out all fear, for fear has to do with punishment; he who fears has not at tained perfect love. We love because he first loved us. If anyone declares, I love God and yet hates his brother, he is a Uar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen, cannot love God whom he has never seen. And we have this command from him, that he who loves God is to love his brother also. The The Christians know and trust God, the Creator of heaven feu0aw-d and earth in whom are aU things and from whom are aU ship of things, and who hath no other God beside bim. From him early they have received the commandments which they have t£"t engraved on theh minds and keep in the hope and ex- (apoi- pectation of the world to come. Therefore they do not Ans- commit adultery nor fornication; they do not bear false i5)es witness; they do not deny what has been deposited with them, nor covet what is not theirs. They honor father and mother and show kindness to theh neighbors. If they are judges, they judge uprightly. They do not wor ship idols made in human form, and whatever they do not wish that others should do to them, they do not to others. They do not eat of food offered to idols because they are undefiled. They placate those who oppress them and make them theh friends; they do good to theh enemies. Theh wives are absolutely pure and theh daughters modest. Theh men abstain from every unlawful marriage and from all impurity in the hope of future recompense. If any of them have bondmen, bondwomen or chUdren, they persuade them to become Christians for the love that they have towards them; and when they become so they call them without distinction, brothers. They do not worship strange gods. They walk in aU humility and kindness, and falsehood is not found among them. They love one an other. They do not refuse to help the widows. They res cue the orphan from him who does him violence. He who has' gives ungrudgingly to him who has not. If they see a stranger, they take him to theh dwellings and rejoice over him as over a real brother; for they do not caU themselves 290 LIFE OF THE EARLY CHRISTIANS brothers after the flesh but after the Spirit and in God. When one of theh poor passes from the world, any one of them who sees it provides for his burial according to his abihty. And if they hear that any one of theh number is in prison or oppressed for the name of theh Messiah, aU of them provide for his needs. And if it is possible to re deem him, they detiver him. If any one among them is poor and needy and they do not have food to spare, they fast two or three days that they may supply bim with the necessary food. They scrupulously observe the commands of theh Messiah. They Uve honestly and soberly as the Lord theh God commanded them. Every morning and every hour they thank and praise God for his loving kind nesses toward them; and for theh food and drink they give thanks to him. If any righteous man among them passes from this world, they rejoice and give thanks to God, and they escort his body as if he were setting out on a journey from one place to another. If, on the other hand, they see that one of theh number has died in his ungodliness or in his sins, they weep bitterly and sigh as over one who is about to go to punishment. As men who know God, they ask from bim what is proper The for him to give and for them to receive. Thus they do SjLs116" throughout theh entire Ufe. And inasmuch as they acknowl- ot the edge the loving kindnesses of God toward them, lo, because oVthe of them, there flows forth aU the beauty that is in the world ! 8J™f" But the good deeds which they do, they do not proclaim ('«) in the ears of the multitude, but they take care that no one shall perceive them. They hide theh gift as one who has found a treasure hides it. Thus they labor to become righteous as those who expect to see theh Messiah and to receive from bim the glorious fulfillment of the promises made to them. Truly this is a new people and there is something divine in them ! I. The Aim and Thought of I John. First John occupies a unique place among the New Testament writings. Although one of the latest, it presents in simplest form the essence of Christianity. In its literary character and in its conception of Jesus and his work, it is closely related to Hebrews. While it is nominally an epistle, it is in 291 THE CHRISTIAN RULE OF LOVE reality a brief homily, containing a series of meditations and exhor tations. In its loosely connected structure, in its epigrammatic style, and in its profound emphasis on life and deeds, as well as upon belief, it is closely akin to the book of James. The reader also recognizes many echoes of Paul's distinctive teachings. All non-essentials, how ever, are cast aside and the eternal principle of love, first clearly pro claimed by the prophet Hosea, and declared by Jesus to be the supreme motive power in religion and morals, is given the central place. What the earlier prophets and Jesus had assumed, the author plainly states, namely, that God is love. The logic that underlies I John is simple and compelling: love, being the chief attribute of God, is the supreme force in the universe. It inspired Jesus to do that saving work for men which is the highest expression of divine love. True love for God begets love for men. It is this love which overcomes all fear, all hatred, and even the power of sin and death, and binds together God, the individual, and mankind into one divine fellowship. The author of I John clearly states in his opening paragraph that his purpose is to enable his readers to enjoy that divine fellowship which has been made possible through the self-sacrificing work of Jesus. He also aims to guard them against certain Docetic teachings, which led to a practical denial of Jesus' human existence (42, 3) and substituted for the simple belief in the Friend and Teacher of mankind a vague, meta physical mysticism. In the concluding notes (513) he reasserts his dominant aim: "I have written in this way to you who believe in the Son of God, that you may be sure that you have eternal life." It was, therefore, to promote love and trust and fellowship among the followers of Jesus that this wonderful homily was committed to writing and sent forth as a tract. II. The Authorship and Date of I John. The bonds which bind together this epistle and the Fourth Gospel are both many and close. In each the point of view is that of eternity, rather than any specific moment in history. Each was inspired by a practical, evan gelical aim. That of the Fourth Gospel is plainly stated in 2031: it is "that you may believe that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in his name." The Fourth Gospel is apparently addressed to both believers and unbelievers, while I John is an intimate message to those who have already felt the love of God inspired by Jesus. Both writings come from a mystic who regards the facts of history and ordinary experience as but symbols of deeper, spiritual realities. To him the material world, with its pomps and its 292 AUTHORSHIP AND DATE OF I JOHN passions, is but a passing panorama. He who does the will of God is the only abiding factor in the phenomena of human life. Many strik ing phrases also bind together these two writings (e. g., "to walk in the light," or, "in darkness," "to be born of God," "to do the truth," and "God is light"). There are also equally striking points of difference. For example, the epistle does not use the Old Testament, while the gos pel does so frequently. In the epistle man's relation to God is direct, while in the gospel it is through Christ. In one the thesis is that the Christ is Jesus, in the other that Jesus is the Christ. While these points of contact and difference may not point to absolute identity of authorship, they can be explained only on the hypothesis that both writings come from the same school ,and are inspired by the same deeply spiritual mind. The maturity of the thought points to a rela tively late period in the apostolic age. The absence of any references to persecution suggests that they come from the brief but bright period between the persecution of Domitian, which ended in 96, and the reign of Trajan, which began in 98. At least a date very close to the beginning of the second Christian century fully satisfies all the impli cations of I John. The author, like that of the Fourth Gospel, reveals the influence of the Alexandrian type of thought. He identifies Jesus with the Logos or Word of Life, eternal and ever existent with God, yet incarnated so that he was seen with the eyes and touched by the hands of his followers. Here the Stoic doctrine of the Logos, the Jewish belief in a pre-existent Messiah, and the Christian memories of the historic Jesus blend. In the light of the oldest historic evidence, it is probable that not John, the son of Zebedee, who, the earliest tra ditions state, was martyred about the middle of the first century, but John, the presbyter of Ephesus, speaks to us, if not through his own pen, through that of one of his faithful followers. If this generally accepted conclusion of modern scholarship be true, we probably have here not merely the richly spiritual message of a later Christian writer, but a luminous reflection of the teachings of the Master himself. III. The Personality back of the Johannine Writings. John, the presbyter of Ephesus, was in all probability "the beloved dis ciple," who, according to the gospel that bears his name, was inti mately associated with Jesus during the closing days of his ministry. He is described in the epilogue of the Fourth Gospel (2124) as, "the disciple who bears testimony to these facts and who wrote them down; his testimony we know is true." It is significant that the early Chris tian writer, Papias, also calls this John, the presbyter, a disciple of 293 THE CHRISTIAN RULE OF LOVE Jesus, even though he was not one of the Twelve. The brief letters known as II John and III John come directly from his hand. The first is a friendly note of warning, sent to an important Christian com munity (addressed as "the elect lady and her children") which the presbyter hopes in the near future to visit personally. The warning is directed against certain travelling preachers who are advocating Docetic teachings similar to those referred to in I John 42- 8. Third John is a private letter to Gaius, who was probably a member of the same community to which the letter in II John was sent. It reveals the fact that another leader of the Christian church, Diotrephes, had refused to submit to the authority of the presbyter and had threat ened to excommunicate Gaius. It is clear that both of these letters were written by one accustomed to exercise authority over the local Christian communities. He is strenuous for the truth which has evidently crystallized in his mind into a definite body of doctrines. Thus he speaks in II John 2 of "the truth which remains within us and will be with us forever." But the dominant note in all this thinking, as in I John, is love: "It is the command which we have had from the very beginning — 'Let us love one another.' To live by his commands, that is what love means. And the command is, 'Live in love as you have learned to do from the beginning.'" The personality revealed in these letters is that of an old man who calls the members of the community under his care "children," and who can remember the historic beginnings of their faith. He, therefore, speaks with the authority of one who had personally heard the com mands of the Master. These implications correspond to the beautiful portrait preserved in a fourth-century tradition, recounted by Jerome in his commentary on Galatians: "When the holy evangelist, John, had lived to extreme old age in Ephesus, he could be carried only with difficulty by the hands of the disciples, and as he was not able to pro nounce more words, he was accustomed to say at every assembly: ' Little children, love one another.' At length the disciples and brothers, being tired of hearing always the same thing, said: 'Master, why do you always say this?' Thereupon John gave an answer worthy of himself: 'Because this is the command of the Lord, and if it is observed, then it is enough.' " The John who is revealed in this tradition, and especially through the three epistles and the gospel which bear his name and the im print of his profound thinking, has a distinct and consistent personality. Even though we know practically nothing about the details of his 294 THE PERSONALITY OF JOHN life, he must be counted with Peter and Paul as one of the three great forces in the apostolic church. The influence of the Alexandrian Greek atmosphere amidst which he spent at least his later years may be recognized not only in his free use of allegory but also in his pecuhar type of thought. He has much in common with Philo of Alexandria, who interpreted the thought of the Greek philosophers in the light of his Jewish inheritance. When John declared in the prologue of his gos pel, "In the beginning the Logos (or Word) was with God," he spoke as a Jew, familiar with the personification of Wisdom in Proverbs S22. When he declared that "the Logos was God," he echoed a familiar Stoic teaching. The two great teachers, however, who influenced John and his disciples most were Paul and Jesus. He fully accepted, for example, Paul's doctrine of the eternal, pre-existent Christ, and of his exaltation in the presence of the Father and the belief that he was to come again to judge the world. He also reasserted Paul's great principle of Christian Uberty through Christ. In his allegory of the vine and its branches he taught Paul's social ideal of the "Body of Christ," From both Jesus and Paul he drew his central teaching that love is the ruling principle in the universe and that service for the Christian community is the only valid basis of reward. In all of his writings he is evidently combating on the one side the belief that Jesus was nothing more than a great teacher and prophet, and on the other the fatal tendency to deny altogether Jesus' humanity. The Fourth Gospel asserts in strongest terms Jesus' divinity and seeks to establish it by seven great signs of which the account of the raising of Lazarus is the culmination. At the same time it emphasizes Jesus' human side: his hunger, his weariness, his changing emotions, and his warm personal affection for his disciples. Thus John established the identity of the exalted Christ, which Paul and the other apostles revered, with the historical Jesus of the Synoptic Gospels. While he harmo nized different currents of Christian thought and combated others, John's great contribution was the emphasis which he placed on Chris tian love and liberty and upon service for the universal brotherhood, which Jesus gave his life to establish. The New Testament would be incomplete without the immortal declaration of faith contained in the words: "God is Love. God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that every one who believes in him might not perish but have eternal life. We love because he first loved us." IV. The Life of the Early Christians. Aristides, the Athenian philosopher, in his defense of the Christians before the Emperor Ha- 295 THE CHRISTIAN RULE OF LOVE drian (117-138), has given a remarkably vivid picture of the life of the early followers of Jesus. It is a picture which is confirmed and supple mented by the testimony of scores of contemporary witnesses. Christi anity proved an open door of hope and opportunity not only to the "lost sheep of the house of Israel" but also to the lost sheep of the pagan world. Even Celsus, its bitterest enemy, exclaims: "What sort of people do the Christians invite to their religious rites ? 'Any one who is a sinner,' they say, 'or devoid of understanding, or simple-minded — in short, whoever is unfortunate will be received in the Kingdom of God.' " To the despondent sinner, to the homeless stranger, to the helpless slave, and to the hopeless outcast Christianity extended the hand of fellowship and a cordial invitation to join the brotherhood of those who were living in accordance with the spirit and teaching of him who declared: "One is your Master, and you all are brothers. Let him who would be first among you be the servant of all." Brother- liness, as illustrated in the life of the early Christian church, has well been defined as "love on a footing of equality." In the presence of the early Christians hostile pagan critics were forced to cry out: "Look, how they love one another!" All this varied cloud of witnesses bear testimony that primitive Christianity was not primarily a creed but a life of love and service. Its rites were very simple. Baptism was conceived of as a bath of purification, "to restore the health of the soul," and to endue the individual with the spirit of Jesus. It meant adoption as a son of God and admission into the Christian fellowship which Jesus had estabUshed. During the first century the Lord's Supper was the evening meal which each local community shared in common. Not until the days of Trajan was it transferred (as a re sult of the imperial decree) to the morning and made a distinctly liturgical act. In the apostoUc church it symbolized Jesus' self-sacri ficing, triumphant service for his followers. It was also the expressive rite which bound together the members of each local Christian com munity and kept forever alive within them their Master's spirit of love and fellowship. Prayers were spontaneous, being inspired by the di rect influence of the Spirit. Speaking with tongues was common. The enthusiasm begotten by the consciousness of being enUsted in a great cause stirred all hearts. These Christian communities were also potent educational forces. All their members were trained by con stant practice, as well as by precept, to govern their every act by the spirit of love and loyalty to the interests of the great brotherhood and to labor for its extension throughout the world. 296 THE LIFE OF THE EARLY CHRISTIANS The organization of these communities was simple and for practical service. At the head of each community stood the bishop who di rected its reUgious life and especially its work for the sick and needy. Next to him, as the responsible directors of the Christian community, were the presbyters or elders. Under the immediate direction of the bishop were the deacons, who are described in an early Christian writ ing as "doers of good works, looking after all by day and by night." In another Christian writing they are directed " to act as eyes for the bishop, caref uUy inquiring into the actions of every church member . . . in order to find out those who are sick in the flesh and to bring such to the notice of the main body, who know nothing of them, that they may visit them and supply their wants." In the early church, widows were appointed to perform the services which later devolved upon the deaconesses. Thus we are told in a second-century document that "in every congregation at least one widow is to be appointed to take care of sick women; she is to be obUging and sober; she is to report cases of need to the elders." Definite contributions were provided for the needy. Justin Martyr in his Apology (LXVII) states: "Those who are well-to-do give as they choose, each as he himself purposes. The coUection is then deposited with the president, who succors or phans, widows, those who are in want owing to sickness or any other cause, those who are in prison, and strangers who are on a journey." AU gifts were voluntary and were simply and directly applied to the needs of each community. Not every Christian proved loyal to the spirit and teachings of his Master, but every effort was made by the members of the community to care for its moraUy delinquent. The lofty yet practical moral ideals of Jesus and Paul were constantly held up before them, not only through the words, but in the lives of their fellow Christians. The second chapter of the First Epistle of Clement, which was written to the Corinthian Christians near the close of the first century, bears eloquent testimony to this fact: "Day and night you agonized for all the brother hood, that by means of compassion and care the number of God's elect might be saved. You were sincere, guileless, and void of maUce among yourselves. Every sedition and every schism was an abomi nation to you. You lamented the transgressions of your neighbors and judged their shortcomings to be your own." Visiting Christians were entertained for three or four days as guests of the local community. Then, if they remained, work was secured for them. Visiting evangehsts, prophets, and laymen bound the Christian 297 THE CHRISTIAN RULE OF LOVE communities together into one great brotherhood. These bonds were strengthened by the exchange of letters and in time by common super vision. The Roman church ultimately won its position of pre-emi nence and authority through its kindly reception of aU Christians visit ing the Imperial City and through its valuable services to the local Christian communities far and near. Thus Paul's great ideal of the unity of the "Body of Christ" was in a measure concretely reaUzed and the social principles of Jesus became the most powerful and abid ing forces in the empire. V. The Essence of Christianity. The ApostoUc Age is pre eminently significant because it reveals in concrete, historical terms the essence of Christianity. Obviously, it is not a system of dogmas, nor a complex ecclesiastical organization, but a Uving historic move ment. From the point of view of the individual, Christianity is not only a faith but an attitude and a way of Uving. Objectively, it is the expansion of the unique brotherhood which Jesus estabUshed during his Galilean ministry. It is the community of those who, under the impulse of his teaching and example, recognize God as their Father and all men as brothers. It is a world-wide fraternity of men and women, young and old, who, in their loyalty to God and in their ser vice for their fellows, are being socially and moraUy redeemed. It is a movement which, during the first century, spread throughout the world unfettered by creeds or rules or complex organization and, therefore, free to adapt itself to the varied needs of humanity. The heroic death of Jesus, instead of destroying this brotherhood, trans ferred its centre to Jerusalem. There his invincible faith, his divine enthusiasm, and his burning zeal to redeem and serve humanity so inspired his followers that their numbers increased with incredible rapidity. Persecution only fanned the flame of love and loyalty into a conflagration that scattered its firebrands throughout the great cities of the empire. The love and zeal of the scattered disciples quickly attracted others to this divine brotherhood, so that before the genera tion which had felt the immediate touch of Jesus' personality had passed away, a chain of Christian communities extended from Jeru salem to Rome. Each citizen of this new commonwealth, that had suddenly sprung into existence, felt himself bound to every other member by the bonds of love and common endeavor. Fraternal co operation took the place of hostile competition. The wiU of God, as interpreted by Jesus and the divine Spirit within them, became their supreme rule of Ufe. Thus in a large measure the spiritual and social 298 THE ESSENCE OF CHRISTIANITY ideal, which Jesus called "the Kingdom of God" and Paul the "Body of Christ," became in the Apostolic Age an historic reaUty. In the succeeding centuries many influences tended to arrest Christianity's normal development; but its ideal of loving fellowship with God and of complete loyalty to the perfect community, which Jesus aimed to estabUsh, remains for the individual and humamty "the way, the truth and the Ufe." 299; APPENDIX A PRACTICAL REFERENCE LIBRARY Books for Constant Reference. The literature on the Apostolic Age is exceedingly voluminous. Moffatt's Introduction to the Litera ture of the New Testament presents in easily accessible form the impor tant bibliography in connection with the New Testament books and the results of modern critical scholarship. McGiffert's Apostolic Age remains the most thoroughgoing and satisfactory history of this im portant period. The general student will find many valuable sugges tions in Bacon's Story of St. Paul. The first part is devoted to the history of Paul and the second part to a discussion of the contents of his letters. Wood's Life and Ministry cf Paul, the Apostle, is an ex ceedingly compact, weU-proportioned study of the work and teachings of the great apostle in the Ught of their historical setting. Ramsay's St. Paul the Traveller and Roman Citizen is in reaUty a historical and geographical commentary on the records of Paul's journeys found in the book of Acts. Upon the problems which these narratives present Professor Ramsay has focused the results of his important investi gations in Asia Minor and Greece. Deissmann's St. Paul — A Study in Social and Religious History is an exceedingly fresh and stimulating interpretation of Paul not only in the Ught of his geographical but also of his inteUectual and reUgious environment. For the study of in dividual books, the volumes of the Century Bible, and especiaUy the compact yet scholarly commentaries in The Bible for Home and School, are reUable and usable. For more detailed study the volumes of the International Critical Commentaries are the best authorities. Additional Books of Reference: Introductions. The brief, compact introductions to the New Testament by Peake and Bacon present the results of critical yet constructive scholarship. JiiUcher's Introduction to the New Testament is more detailed and yet is exceed ingly luminous and stimulating. Harnack's Acts of the Apostles contains a minute study of the Uterary structure and sources of Acts. Even 301 APPENDIX though the facts and conclusions here presented may not be accepted by the reader, they are exceedingly suggestive. The monograph by Torrey, entitled The Aramaic Source in the Book of Acts, throws much new Ught upon the origin and historical value of Luke's great epic of conquering Christianity. Lake's Earlier Epistles cf St. Paul deals not only with the critical questions presented by Paul's major epistles but also with their interpretation and harmonization with the paraUel records contained in Acts. In his Light from the Ancient East Professor Deissmann has placed at the disposal of the reader a wealth of con temporary Greek Uterature and archaeological material which illumi nates the New Testament writings. Contemporary Religions. In his Evolution of Early Christianity Professor Case has presented in compact but masterly form the differ ent currents of religious Ufe and thought amidst which Christianity developed and has traced their influence upon Christian thought during the formative Apostolic Age. In a more minute, painstaking, and yet on the whole less satisfying manner, Clemen deals with the same problem in his Primitive Christianity and its Non-Jewish Sources. Kennedy in his St. Paul and the Mystery Religions and Gardner in his Religious Experiences of St. Paul discuss the influence of Paul's religious environment upon the development of his faith. Histories of the Apostolic Age. Weizsacher's The Apostolic Age and the Christian Church (I, II) presents a vivid and detailed pic ture of the development of the early church. Bartlet's The Apostolic Age is a well-proportioned sketch of the period. Ropes's Apostolic Age is not a complete history but rather a discussion of certain im portant problems and phases in the life of this important era. It contains many valuable suggestions for the more advanced student. Scott's The Beginnings of the Church is a detailed study of the life of the Christian community at Jerusalem in the days preceding the work of Paul. Ramsay, in his Church in the Roman Empire, presents the larger political environment of Christianity. Dobschutz, in his Apostolic Age, treats briefly but vividly the life of the Christian com munities, beginning with the death of Jesus and extending down into the Post-Apostolic Age. This volume is paraUeled by his larger and more detaued Christian Life in the Primitive Church. This volume contains a wealth of data which make exceedingly real the life and problems of the early Christian communities. Sinular in scope and aim is Harnack's Expansion of Christianity (I, II). The student who desires to consult the extrarcanonical authorities regarding the Apos- 302 APPENDIX toUc and Post-Apostolic Age will find a careful selection of the more important passages in Ayer's Source Book for Ancient Church History. Lives of Paul. A fascinating, concise sketch of the personality and thought of Paul, written from a critical but sympathetic point of view, is found in Wrede's Paul. Equally critical, but in many respects more satisfying, is Weinel's St. Paul — The Man and His Work. Each of these writers is a severe yet appreciative critic of the great apostle. To this same class belongs Clemen's Paul, His Life and Work. Two stimulating volumes, which are the outgrowth of the hotly contested controversy as to whether Jesus or Paul was the real founder of Christianity, are Meyer's Jesus or Paul and Weiss's Paul and Jesus. Jones, in his Paul, the Orator, discusses at length the forensic side of the great apostle's activity. Ramsay, in his Cities of St. Paul, presents a rich abundance of historical and archaeological data regarding the scenes amidst which Paul carried on his epoch-making missionary campaigns in Asia Minor. II GENERAL QUESTIONS AND SUBJECTS FOR SPECIAL RESEARCH The General Questions, as in the preceding volumes, follow the main divisions of the book and aim to guide the student in collecting and co-ordinating the more important facts presented in the biblical texts or in the notes. The Subjects for Special Research are intended as a guide for further study in related lines, and aim, by means of detafled refer ences, to introduce the student and the teacher to the more important passages in the best EngUsh books of reference. In classroom work many of these topics may profitably be assigned for individual research. The references are to pages, unless otherwise indicated. Ordinarily, several paraUel references are given, that the student may be able to utilize the book at hand. INTRODUCTION: THE RECORDS AND BACKGROUND OF THE APOSTOLIC AGE I. The Records of the Work and Teachings of the Apostles. General Questions: 1. Describe the duration and importance of the Apostolic Age. 2. The historical value of the New Testament letters 303 APPENDIX and epistles. 3. Reasons that led the author to write the book of Acts. 4. Evidence that the author was Luke, the physician. 5. His per sonality and equipment. 6. Nature of the sources incorporated in Acts V-1536. 7. Historical value of the journal of travel in 1535-2831. 8. Conclusions regardmg the historical value of the records of the ApostoUc Age. Subjects for Special Research: 1. Luke's use of medical terms in Acts. Moffatt, Introd. to N. T., 289, 290; Harnack, Luke the Physi cian, 175-198; Hobart, The Medical Language of St Paul. 2. The historical accuracy of Acts. Moffatt, Introd. to N. T., 304-8; Light foot, Essay on "Supernatural Religions," 291-302; Ramsay, Christian ity in the Roman Empire, chaps. II-VHI. II. The Historical and Religious Background of the Apos tolic Age. General Questions: 1. Describe the personahty and policy of each of the Roman emperors from Tiberius to Trajan. 2. The ways in which Rome prepared the world for Christianity. 3. The his tory of the Jews of Palestine from 36 to 90 a.d. 4. Compare the Jews of Palestine with those of the dispersion. 5. Describe the ways in which the Jews attempted to win the heathen to Judaism. 6. The teachings of Epicureanism, Cynicism, and Stoicism. 7. The ideas underlying emperor-worship, and their significance for Christianity. 8. The char acteristics of the mystery-religions. 9. The social and reUgious needs of the Roman world. Subjects for Special Research: 1. The history and tenets of Stoicism. Case, Evolution of Christianity, 267-283; Article, "Stoicism," in Encyc. Brit. 2. Origin of the Roman emperor-worship. Case, Evolution of Christianity, 195-222; Deissmann, Light from the Ancient East, 342-384. 3. Contemporary mystery-religions. Case, Evolution of Christianity, 284-330; Cumont, Oriental Religions in Roman Paganism; Mead, Thrice Greatest Hermes; Reitzenstein, Poimandres; Jacoby, Die antiken Mysterienreligionen und das Christentum. PRIMITIVE CHRISTIANITY IN PALESTINE AND SYRIA § CXLVL The Origin of the Jerusalem Christian Community. General Questions: 1. Why did Jesus' followers immediately after his death make Jerusalem their home? 2. Describe the personnel of the Jerusalem Christian community. 3. The motives that led the disciples to elect Matthias. 4. The historical and traditional ele ments in the story of the day of Pentecost. 5. The psychological ex- 304 APPENDIX perience that then came to the members of the Jerusalem commu nity. 6. The central ideas in Peter's sermon. 7. The beliefs of the primitive Christians. Subjects for Special Research: 1. Speaking with tongues in the early Christian church. Scott, The Beginnings of the Church, 57-83; Lake, Earlier Epistles of St. Paul, 241-252; Cutten, Psych. Phenomena of Christianity, 37-59. 2. The use of the title "Lord." Scott, Begin nings of the Church, 84-108; Weiss, Kurios. 3. Mediseval and modern faith-cures. Cutten, Psych. Phenomena of Christianity, 196-231. § CXLVII. The Life of the Primitive Christian Community. General Questions: 1. Describe the circumstances and the sig nificance of the healing of the lame man in the temple. 2. The lead ing ideas in Peter's address to the multitude. 3. The reasons why the apostles were arrested and the basis of their defense before the Sanhedrin. 4. Economic and social principles governing the Chris tian community at Jerusalem. 5. The sin of Ananias and Sapphira. 6. How far and in what respects was the community at Jerusalem a local realization of Jesus' ideal of the Kingdom of God ? Subjects for Special Research: 1. The origin and history of the Ecclesia or Church. Scott, Beginnings of the Church, 28-56; Hastings, D. B.,1, 425, 426. 2. Communistic tendencies in early Christianity. McGiffert, Apostolic Age, 66-70; Dobschutz, Christian Life in the Prim. Church, 143-6; Rauschenbush, Christianity and the Social Crisis 120-3. §CXLVm. The Work and Death of Stephen. General Questions: 1. Why did Christianity appeal especiaUy to the Jews of the dispersion? 2. Describe the reasons which led to the appointment of the seven, and their personnel. 3. The personality of Stephen. 4. The subjects discussed by him with the Hellenistic Jews. 5. His attitude toward Judaism and his claims for Christianity. 6. His con tributions to the new faith through his teachings and martyrdom. Subjects for Special Research: 1. The reUgious and social Ufe of the Jewish synagogue. Hastings, D. B., IV, 640-3; Oesterley and Box, Religion and Worship of the Synagogue. 2. The Jewish proselyting movement. McGiffert, Apostolic Age, 157-160; Dobschutz, Life in the Primitive Church, 160-7; Harnack, Expansion of Christianity,!, 11-18; Thatcher, The Apostolic Church, 19-33. § CXLIX. The Expansion of Christianity after the Death of Stephen. General Questions: 1. Describe the effect of Stephen's martyrdom upon Jesus' foUowers. 2. The personaUty and teachings 305 APPENDIX of PhiUp the evangelist. 3. The results and limitations of his work among the Samaritans. 4. The basis and significance of the conver sion of the Ethiopian eunuch. 5. The steps which led to the estabUsh- ment of Christianity at Antioch. 6. The historical origin of the term "Christian." 7. The nature of the persecution of the Christians under Herod Agrippa I. 8. Influences that transformed Peter's attitude toward the Gentiles. 9. The permanent contributions of the Pales tinian Christians to Christianity. Subjects for Special Research: 1. Antioch at the middle of the first Christian century. Hastings, D. B., I, 103, 104; Ramsay, Church in the Roman Empire, chaps. II-VII. 2. The reign of Herod Agrippa I. Hastings, D. B., II, 359, 360; Mathews, Hist, of N. T. Times, 181-7; Schurer, Jewish People in the Time of Jesus Christ, Div. I, II, 150-165. PAUL'S WORK AND TEACHINGS § CL. Paul's Early Training and Conversion. General Ques tions: 1. Describe Paul's physical and fanuly inheritance. 2. His personal characteristics. 3. His intellectual and religious environment at Tarsus. 4. His educational opportunities at Jerusalem. 5. The motives that led him to persecute the followers of Jesus. 6. The dif ferences and points of agreement in the four accounts of his conversion. 7. The experience that made him a devoted foUower of Jesus. 8. The first fifteen years of his missionary activity. 9. His opportunities to become acquainted with the life and teachings of Jesus. Subjects for Special Research: 1. The situation and history of Tarsus. Wood, Life and Ministry of Paul, 23-30; Ramsay, Cities of St. Paul, 85-244. 2. Paul's conversion. Wood, Life and Ministry of Paul, 49-53; Bacon, Story of St. Paul, 34-67; Deissmann, St. Paul, 115-124; Gardner, Religious Experiences of St. Paul, 20-56. §CLI. Paul's First Missionary Campaign. General Ques tions: 1. Significance of Paul's year of work with the Antioch com munity. 2. The reasons why he and Barnabas set out on their first missionary campaign. 3. The limitations and results of their work at Cyprus. 4. Paul's reasons for going to southern Asia Minor. 5. The conditions which confronted Paul and Barnabas in Galatian Antioch. 6. Their experiences at Iconium and Lystra. 7. The results of their first campaign in Asia Minor. Subjects for Special Research: 1. The situation and strategic importance of Galatian Antioch. En. Bib., I, 184; Ramsay, Cities of 306 APPENDIX St. Paul, 247-295. 2. The situation of Iconium. En. Bib., II, 2144-o; Ramsay, Cities of St. Paul, 317-382. § CLII. The Breaking of Jewish Bonds. General Ques tions: 1. Why did the missionary campaign of Paul and Barnabas present a difficult problem to the Christian church, and what was the nature of that problem ? 2. Discuss the date and significance of Paul's conference with the "pular" apostles at Jerusalem. 3. Peter's vac illation in regard to associating with Gentile Christians. 4. The atti tude of the Judaistic party in the church. 5. The proposed com promise. 6. Paul's contributions to the ultimate solution of the problem. Subjects for Special Research: 1. The chronology of Paul's Ufe. Moffatt, Introd. to N. T., 62-64; Hastings, D. B., I, 423-5; En. Bib., I, 809-817; Deissmann, St. Paul, 235-260. 2. The charges which the Jews brought against the Christians. Case, Evolution of Christianity, 123-146; McGiffert, Apostolic Age, 192-211. § CLII I . Paul ' s Second Visit and Later Letter to the Churches of Galatia. General Questions: 1. Describe Paul's immediate and ultimate objective in his second missionary campaign. 2. The com munities to which the epistle to the Galatians was written. 3. Its date and aim. 4. Paul's method of presenting his convictions. 5. His estimate of the relative importance of the Jewish law and of the work of Jesus. 6. The meaning and responsibflities of Christian freedom. Subjects for Special Research: 1. The North and South Galatian theories. Moffatt, Introd. to N. T., 90-101; McGiffert, Apostolic Age, 178-181; Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveller, 178-184. 2. Date of Paul's letter to the Galatians. Moffatt, Introd. to N. T., 101-6; Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveller, 189-192; Lake, Earlier Epistles of St. Paul, 253-273. § CLLV. Paul's Missionary Work in Macedonia. General Questions: 1. Describe the probable reasons why Paul did not at once continue his work in Asia Minor. 2. The psychological antece dents and significance of his vision at Troas. 3. The conditions under which he worked at PbiUppi. 4. The results of his work there. 5. Con ditions at Thessalonica. 6. The character of the Christian commu nity which he there estabUshed. 7. The significance of his work in Macedonia. Subjects for Special Research: 1. The nature of Paul's visions. Weinel, St. Paul, 80-84; Cutten, Psych. Phenomena of Christianity, 60-70. 2. The situation and history of PhiUppi. Hastings, D. B., IH, 837; En. Bib., Ill, 3701-3. 307 APPENDIX §CLV. Paul's Letters to the Christians at Thessalonica. General Questions: 1. Describe the general structure and the five distinctive divisions found in the majority of Paul's letters. 2. The characteristics and the charm of Paul's Uterary style. 3. The rea sons why Paul wrote his first letter to the Thessalonians. 4. Its structure. 5. Its leading ideas. 6. The structure of II Thessalonians. 7. The evidence that it was written by Paul. 8. Its important teachings. Subjects for Special Research: 1. Contemporary Greek letters. Deissmann, Light from the Ancient East, 107-400. 2. Evidence for and against the authenticity of II Thessalonians. Moffatt, Introd. to N. T., 81, 82; Bacon, St. Paul, 243-251. 3. The situation and history of Thessalonica. En. Bib., IV, 5046-8; Hastings, D. B., IV, 749, 750. §CLVI. Paul's Work at Athens and Corinth. General Questions: 1. Draw a general plan indicating the situation of the important pubUc bufldings at Athens when Paul visited it. 2. De scribe its inteUectual and religious life and Paul's attitude toward it. 3. Express in the form of a paraphrase the leading ideas in his ad dress to the Athenian crowd. 4. The way in which it was received. 5. In what did Paul's skill as an orator consist? 6. What pecuUar and difficult problems confronted Paul at Corinth ? 7. What new methods did he there employ? 8. In what respects was his work at Corinth successful? Subjects for Special Research: 1. PhUosophical schools in Athens in Paul's day. Ramsay, St. Paul the Traveller, 238-244; ZeUer, The Stoics, Epicureans, and Skeptics; Windelband, Hist, of Ancient Philosophy; Gomperz, Greek Thinkers, II, III. 2. The geographical and commercial importance of Corinth. Dobschutz, Life in the Primi tive Church, 11-13; Frazer, Pausanias, II, 1, 2; En. Bib., I, 897-9. § CLVII. Paul's Correspondence with the Corinthian Church. General Questions: 1. Describe the intellectual and moral con ditions in Corinth when Paul visited it. 2. The pecuUar problems in the Christian church at Corinth. 3. The contents of Paul's first letter to the Corinthian Christians. 4. The structure and contents of his second letter: I Corinthians. 5. Paul's method of dealing with factions in the Christian church. 6. His teachings regarding personal im moraUty. 7. The occasion and contents of his third letter to the Corinthians. 8. The structure and leading ideas of his fourth letter. Subjects for Special Research: 1. Paul's teachings regarding the death and resurrection of Jesus. Deissmann, St. Paul, 173-9; Weinel, St. Paul, 300-312. 2. The later history of the Corinthian 308 APPENDIX church reflected in I Clement. Dobschutz, Life in the Primitive Church, 211-7; Ante-Nicene Fathers, I, 1-21. §CLVIII. Paul's Principles of Christian Living. General Questions: 1. Formulate in your own words Paul's statement of a Christian's duty in case a dispute arises with a feUow Christian. 2. Describe his conception of the moral responsibilities of those who enjoyed Christian Uberty. 3. Compare his teachings and those of Jesus regarding marriage and divorce. 4. Describe his practical inter pretation of Jesus' law of love. 5. His teachings regarding the "Body of Christ." 6. The setting of his hymn to love in I Corinthians 13. 7. Express in the form of a paraphrase the leading ideas in this hymn. Subjects for Special Research: 1. A comparison of the Roman and Christian attitude toward divorce. Westermarck, Hist, of Human Marriage; Howard, Hist, of Matrimonial Institutions, I. 2. The literary charm of Paul's hymn in praise of love. Weinel, St. Paul, 137; Von Norden, Antik. Kunstprosa, II, 506. §CLIX. Paul's Ministry at Ephesus. General Questions: 1. Trace on the map Paul's probable itinerary from Ephesus to An tioch. 2. Describe the situation of Ephesus. 3. Its political and re Ugious importance. 4. Its inteUectual Ufe in Paul's day. 5. The ways in which Paul adapted his methods to local conditions. 6. The pagan opposition which he aroused. 7. The limitations and the re sults of his work at Ephesus. Subjects for Special Research: 1. The history of Ephesus and the results of recent excavation. En. Bib., II, 1302-5; Hastings, D. B., I, 720-4; Wood, Discoveries at Ephesus. 2. The temple of Artemis. Hastings, D. B., I, 605, 606, 724; En. Bib., I, 1098-1100. § CLX. Paul's Interpretation of Jesus' Saving Work. Gen eral Questions: 1. Describe the reasons which led Paul to write his epistle to the Romans. 2. Its structure and important divisions. 3. The practical value and limitations of the Jewish legal system. 4. What Jesus and his teaching had done for Paul. 5. The inherited ideas which shaped Paul's conception of Jesus. 6. The different figures which he employed to describe Jesus' saving work, and their meaning. 7. The way in which Jesus, according to Paul, saves men. Subjects for Special Research: 1. The Christian church at Rome. McGiffert, Apostolic Age, 325, 328, 588-593; Dobschutz, Life in the Primitive Church, 121-3, 203, 204. 2. Paul's theology. Deiss mann, St. Paul, 143-192; Ropes, Apostolic Age, 134-168; Wrede, Paul, 84-119; Weinel, St. Paul, 286-352. 309 APPENDIX §CLXI. Paul's Social Teachings. General Questions: 1. Describe Paul's interest in ethical and social questions. 2. The evidence that he had a wide and first-hand knowledge of many of Jesus' social teachings. 3. Paul's statement of Jesus' principle of self- sacrifice. 4. The Christian's duty to his feUow Christians. 5. To civU authorities and organized society. 6. Paul's principle of tolera tion. 7. The influence of his belief in the speedy second coming of Jesus upon his social teaching and activity. 8. Compare Jesus' teach ings regarding the Kingdom of God and Paul's regarding the "Body of Christ." Subjects for Special Research: 1. Social Ufe in the Roman Em pire. Fowler, Social Life at Rome in the Age of Cicero; Tucker, Life in the Roman World of Nero and St. Paul. 2. The social Ufe of the early Christian churches. Harnack, Expansion of Christianity, I, 181-249. 3. Royce's interpretation of Paul's social teachings, The Problem of Christianity, I, II. § CLXII. Paul's Last Journey to Jerusalem. General Ques tions : 1. Describe the incidents of Paul's journey to Jerusalem. 2. The reasons that led him to revisit the home of Judaism. 3. The extent to which his mission to the Jerusalem church appears to have been successful. 4. The reasons why the Jews hated him. 5. The basis and nature of their attack. 6. Was Paul's visit to Jerusalem a mistake ? Subjects for Special Research: 1. Paul's skill and methods as an organizer. Wrede, Paul, 56-62; Weinel, St. Paul, 200-217. 2. The finances of the early Christian churches. Dobschutz, Life in the Primi tive Church, 58, 59; Harnack, Expansion cf Christianity, I, 227-230. § CLXIII. The Ambassador in Bonds. General Questions: 1. Describe the reasons why Felix kept Paul in prison for two years. 2. The charge of TertuUus, .and Paul's defense before Felix. 3. The intellectual atmosphere of Caesarea. 4. The evidence regarding the date of the proconsulship of Festus. 5. Paul's reasons for appealing to Caesar. 6. Trace on a map Paul's journey from Jerusalem to Rome. 7. The story of his shipwreck. 8. His life as a prisoner at Rome. Subjects for Special Research: 1. The personal history of Felix. En. Bib., II, 1516, 1517; Schurer, Hist, of the Jew. People, Div. I, II, 174-183. 2. Roman ships and methods of sailing. En. Bib., IV, 4480-4; Smith, Voyage and Shipwreck of St. Paul; Torr, An cient Ships. § CLXIV. The Last Letters of the Aged Prisoner. General Questions: 1. Describe the letters which Paul wrote during his im- 310 APPENDIX prisonment at Rome. 2. His aim in writing to PhUemon and the way in which he endeavored to accompUsh it. 3. The occasion of his letter to the Colossians. 4. The teachings which it presents. 5. The evi dence that the so-caUed epistle to the Ephesians was written by Paul. 6. Its leading ideas. 7. The aim of Paul's letter to the Philippians. 8. The Ught which it throws upon Paul's condition at the time. 9. Paul's leading contributions to the beUefs, the organization, and the social ideals of Christianity. Subjects for Special Research: 1. Origin and distinctive be Uefs of Gnosticism. Dobschutz, Life in the Primitive Church, 251-276; En. Bib., H, 1738-42; Mansel, Gnostic Heresies. 2. Polycarp's Epis tle to the PhiUppians. Ante-Nicene Fathers, 1, 31-36. 3. Paul's contri butions to the faith of Christianity. Wrede, Paul, 155-182. CHRISTIANITY DURING THE SECOND HALF OF THE FIRST CENTURY §CLXV. The Message of Hope and Inspiration in I Peter. General Questions: 1. What is known regarding Peter's later activity? 2. What evidence is there that he died a martyr at Rome? 3. Describe the extension of Christianity throughout the Roman world during the first century. 4. How far did it penetrate the im perial household ? 5. What does Pliny state regarding the character of the Christians in Bithynia? 6. Describe Domitian's persecutions of the Christians. 7. The aim of I Peter. 8. Its probable authorship and date. 9. Its leading ideas. Subjects for Special Research: 1. Domitian's poUcy toward his subjects. Ayer, Source Book for Ancient Church History, 11, 12; Ramsay, The Church in the Roman Empire. 2. The thought and au thorship of II Peter. Moffatt, Introd. to N. T., 359-371; JiiUcher, Introd. to N. T., 232-241. § CLXVI. The Early Christian Sermon in Hebrews. General Questions: 1. Describe the evidence that the so-called epistle to the Hebrews was originally uttered as a sermon. 2. The character and point of view of its author. 3. The class to which it was ad dressed. 4. The temptations which confronted them. 5. The aim of the author of Hebrews. 6. The way in which he develops his theme. 7. The Uterary charm of Hebrews. 8. Its contribution to the faith of Christianity. 311 APPENDIX Subjects for Special Research: 1. The characteristics of Alex andrian life and philosophy. Encyc. Brit. I, 573-5; Kingsley, Alex andria and Her Schools; Zeller, History of Philosophy; Knaack, Alexandrische Litteratur. 2. A comparison of Paul's interpretation of the character and work of Jesus with that of the author of Hebrews. § CLXVTI. The Visions of the Ultimate Victory of Christian ity in the Book of Revelation. General Questions: 1. Describe the aims of the author of the book of Revelation. 2. The practical problems with which the author is dealing. 3. The class of literature to which it belongs. 4. Point of view and date at which it was written. 5. Its use of figures drawn from early apocalyptic writings. 6. The meaning of its dramatic pictures. 7. The social significance of its description of the new Jerusalem. Subjects for Special Research: 1. The apocalypse contained in IV Ezra. Charles, The Apocryphal and Pseudepigrapha of the 0. T., 542-624. 2. Christian beliefs regarding the end of the world. Clemen, Primitive Christianity and its Non-Jewish Sources, 117-174. § CLXVIIL The Christian Wisdom of the Epistle of James. General Questions: 1. Describe the Uterary pecuUarities of the epistle of James. 2. The motives which influenced its author to write. 3. The history of James, the brother of Jesus. 4. The prob able date of the epistle of James. 5. The point of view and char acter of its author. 6. Its distinctive teachings. 7. Its emphasis on democracy. 8. Its practical value. Subjects for Special Research: 1. History of the Palestinian Christian communities. Harnack, Expansion cf Christianity, II, 247- 276. 2. The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles. Ayer, Source Book for Ancient Church History, 37-11; Hastings, D. B., Extra Vol., 438-451. § CLXIX. The Rule of Love in the Early Christian Church. General Questions: 1. Describe the aim of the author of I John. 2. Its teaching regarding love. 3. Its probable author and date. 4. The evidence that I John and the Fourth Gospel come from the same ultimate source. 5. The personality revealed in the Johannine writings. 6. Evidences that the principles of love prevaUed in the early Christian communities. 7. The organization and institutions of the early churches. 8. What is Christianity? Subjects for Special Research: 1. The picture of early Chris tian life in the Shepherd of Hermas. Dobschutz, Life in the Primitive Church, 309-362. 2. The treatment of the sick and needy in the early church. Dobschutz, Life in tlie Primitive Church, 368-370; Harnack, 312 APPENDIX Expansion of Christianity, I, 131-151, 230-236; Ulhorn, Christian Charity in the Ancient Church. 3. Baptism and the Lord's Supper in the early church. Scott, Beginnings of the Church, 162-223; Clemen, Primitive Christianity and its Non-Jewish Sources, 212-266; Heit- muller, Taufe und Abendmahl im Urchristentum. 313 YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 3 9002 05130 4849