Ca^CLi 60 &.A '''^ lerreotyped by M'^DorvieQl y^^ LIFE OP GEORGE P. BARKER. WITH SKETCHES OF SOME OP HIS CELEBEATED SPEECHES ; THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE BAR OP ERIE COUNTY ON THE OCCASION OF HIS DEATH ; FUNERAL SERMON OF JOHN C. LORD, D. D. BY GEORGE J. BRYAN. BUFFALO: OLIVER G. STEELE. 1849. "^1 , HU Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1849, by GEORGE J. BRYAN, In the Clerk's Office of the Northern District of New York. U\x PREFACE. It is wiih considerable diffidence that I present this work to the public. The ordinary difficulties which attend the preparation of a Biography, were in this instance considerably increased by causes which were directly connected wiili the sub ject of this memoir. George P. Baukhr, it is true, is exten sively known as a man of genius and fascinating social qualities, which language cannot adequately describe ; but from the pecu liar character of his public efforts, I found it extremely difficult to collate materials out of which to frame a work that would do justice to his great reputation. Doubtless much of hisfame was acquired by his splendid, and in some respects, unrivaled forensic efforts. Tne imperfect record ofthem, however, precluded their detailed narration. In my endeavors to portray his intellectual and social qualities, I may have failed to depict them as more ex perienced writers would have done. I may even have uninten tionally offended those I am most desirous of pleasing. I trust, however, though all I submit can not be approved, it will not elicit condemnation. Undertakings like mine, are ever attended with difficulties, and sometimes meet with disapproval. As a general thing, I have met with the most gratifying and generous VI PREFACE. support. To those kind friends who have cheered my humble enterprise by their countenance and efficient aid, I tender my cordial thanks. I must attribute their approval, however, rather to the high estimation in which they hold the memory of him I have feebly attempted to portray, than to any merit of my own. In conclusion, I ask for the imperfections and errors which may have crept into my work, the indulgence of a generous public. G. J. B, CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. Page. Introduction 9 Early career of M r. Barker, 12 His collegiate history, 13 CHAPTER II. His life as a student, 18 Incidents, 21 His admission to the bar, 33 Nominated for the legislature, 34 Appointed District Attorney, 35 His marriage, 37 Nominated for Congress, 38 CHAPTER III. Elected to the legislature, 40 His legislative career, 50 CHAPTER IV. His legislative career continued, 68 CHAPTER V. Again nominated for Congress, 92 His law partnerships, 93 His military career 94 Vlil CONTENTS. Contest for Mayor, 96 Election of 1840, 99 Assembly of 1842, 102 Democratic legislative caucus, 103 Appointed Attorney General, 109 Correspondence, 110 CHAPTER VI. Presidential election of 1844, 115 The secret circular, 118 Mr. Barker's speech with reference thereto, 119 Result of the election, 134 CHAPTER VII. History of his Attorney Generalship, 135 CHAPTER VIII. Re-appointed District Attorney, 152 Incident, 153 His health, 156 Case of Pollock, 159 Syracuse Convention, 165 "Mr. Barker's last political speech, 169 CHAPTER IX. Alarming state of his health, 171 His death, 173 Proceedings in the Recorder's Court 174 Meeting of the bar 175 His funeral, 17g His general characteristics, 180 Eulogies, 182 CHAPTER X. Funeral sermon of John C. Lord, D. D., 185 LIFE OF BARKER. CHAPTER I. Conspicuous among those names which have shed luster on Western New York, stands that of George Payson Barker. Though all that was mortal of him has been gathered to his fathers, the fragrance of his good name survives in its original freshness. In his decease. Liberty lost one of its giant defenders ; — Oratory, one of its colossal pillars-, — Magnanimity, one of its noblest illustrations, and Generosity one of its stri king examples. Few men ever lived in our country who were so singularly gifted with those rare qualities of the head and heart, that call forth admiration and enchain the affections. Entirely the architect of his 2 10 LIFE OF BARKEH. own fortune, he carved out by his energy, perseverance and talent, a name of which any man might well be proud. He was a man of genius, impetuous and brilliant. Tali, exceedingly prepossessing and commanding in person •, urbane in his manners ; generous to a fault, with an car never closed to the appeals of suffering humanity ; the possessor of oratorical pow ers which have been compared to those that immortalize the name of Henry Clay, — endowed with good judgment 5 — possess ing great decision and elasticity of mind j accessible to all, no wonder he was so uni versally popular. His deep sympathy with the masses 5 his appreciation of their true condition ; his ever ready aid to the suffer ing, gathered around him hosts of devoted friends, who were true, whether fortune frowned cr smiled upon his pathway. Such were some of the general characteristics of the subject of this memoir. Citizens do not often over estimate townsmen, and sometimes see "things that are not to be seen" in the characters of those viewed through that distance which lends enchant- LIFE OP B.ARKER. ll tncnt. As a general thing, CufTalonians, however, have ever done justice to George P. Barker. His name has become identi- jSed with the history of thc city. His elo quence, his ardent, generous nature can not soon be forgotten. It is to place in a con nected form the pi'incipal events ofhis bril liant career, that I write his biography. I have no desiie to pen a fulsome panegyric. I shall endeavor in the course of this work to give in detail his history. While I free ly accord to m;my greater ability to do so, I concede to no one a mare enthusiastic ad miration of his distinguishing traits. I purpose to narrate incidents illustrative of his character 5 to portray, as vividly and graphically as possible, his intellectual, moral and social qualities. If I succeed in chronicling a f-ufficiency of incidents to enable those who were unacquainted with him to arrive at an accurate e&timate of his real character ; if I can infuse into ethers something of the high admiration I enter- tain lor the nobility of soul he possessed ; something like a just estimation ofhis genius, my object will be attained. In my humble 12 LIP'S OF BARKER. judgment there are few men now living who excel him in those qualities which exalt and dignify. In the language of an esteemed friend and classmate of the deceased, he was " Generous, high minded, frank and chivalrous 5 — gifted with a most delicate sense of honor, and a brilliant intellect. Whether he was a " gentleman born " or not, I cannot say, but I am certain that na ture made him a gentleman, '1 here was an irresistible charm in his manner that no art or inheritance could impart." Mr. Barker was born at Rindge, in the State of New Hampshire, on the 2oth of October, 1807. He was an only child. His parents were respectable, and in his mother's line are found some of the most distinguished men in New England. Her maiden name was Payson. Mr. Barker was much indebted to Rev. Dr. Payson, his maternal uncle, a clergyman of high stand ing, for his early education. He was pre pared for college in his native State, under the private tuition of a clergyman, which was a custom much in vogue in New Eng land thirty years since. He always thought tit^E OF BARKER. 13 this the most thorough part of his educa tion. His father died when the subject of this memoir was quite young. His mother however, is still living at Rindge. Although far advanced in years, she is still in full pos session of all the faculties of a mind of re markable strength, and enjoys the esteem of all who know her. The materials out of which to gather his early career, I found very imperfect. His character up to entering Amherst col lege, was that of a bold, restless and prom ising boy. He gave early indications of the genius for which he was afterwards noted. He was fond of youthful pastimes, and at an early age developed the vigorous frame of a man. He was admitted into Amherst college in 1823, and immediately became distinguished as an indefatigable student. Ho indeed soon ranked among the first scholars of the institution. He entered the senior class in Union college in October, 1826, on an honorable dismission from Amherst. Rev. Dr. Nott, the venerable and highly esteemed Presi^ dent of Union collge, over which he has 2* 14 LIFE OF BARKEfif. presided for some forty four years, in an swer to a letter addressed to him on thc subject of Mr. Barker's collegiate career, writes me that he was in good standing as a scholar duri ig the year he passed there, and that his attendance and application to study was equal to the be.st. He was in rather straightened circumstances, and de pended m.-iinly on his own exertions for support. He was often in the habit of attending the minor courts in Schenectady and some of the adjacent villages and trying causes. The remuneration however, for these services was of course inconsiderable. Th3 college books show the prompt and honorable discharge after leaving, of an obligation left with thcui for a portion of his college bills. Many of his classmates in college have become distinguished. Prominent among them are lion. Preston King; Hon. Levi Hubbell, formerly adju tant general of this state-, Hon. Rufus W. Peckham of Albany ; William W. Campbell of New York-, Hon. Min- thorno Tompkins, late state senator from Long Island 5 Hon. Virgil Paris, late LIFE OF KAIIKKR. 15 M. C. from Maine; Hon. P. H. Sylvester, M. C. from Kinderhook; Rev. President Woods, of IJowdoin college, Brunswick, Maine -, Kev. J'resident McMaster, of the Miami Uaiversity, Oxford, Ohio; Rev. John Wayland, D. !>., late of Canandaigua, and Ambrose Stevens, Esq., of New York. Rev. Arthur Burtis, now of this city was also one of his classmntes. In our city are located several gentlemen who were in Union college at the time of Mr. B.'s con nection with it, but they were members of younger classes and consequently did not graduate the same year. Hon. .John T. Hudson, lion. .Joseph G. Masten, Elijah Ford, Esq., Dr. Charles Winne, and Rev. M. La Rue P. Thompson, are all I now re collect. To many of these gentlemen I addressed communications for the purpose of eliciting facts relative to his colleyiate history. Quite a number of them rendered mc prompt and satisfactory answers, whicli were of essential service. Some of them pronounced feeling and beautiful eulogies on the great merits of deceased. They speak of his personal appearance at that 16 LIFE OF BARKER. age, (about 19 years) as being unusually imposing; his manners and address quite superior; his conversational powers as un rivaled; and as having a natural fluency which placed him much in advance of all others of his age in the charms of social conversation and in the debates in which the members of his class were called upon at times to engage. His liberality to stu dents whose circumstances or position were not equal to his own, was always extended to the limits of his means. His kindness of heart and uniform amenity of deportment won a high place in the affections of all in the institution. He was an attentive and in dustrious student. In general information, history, biography, classical literature and the belles-lettres, he had few equals. Al though in some departments of the course of studies he might have had superiors, it was thought he was unsurpassed in general scholarship. All confidently predicted that he would rise to distinction in after life. It was conceded that ho possessed abilities, industry and energy sufficient to surmount all obstacles ; they were of such a sterling LIFE OF BARKER. 17 character as to be depressed by no opposi- sition or adversity. He was in his college career sensibly alive to a good joke; in fact, were I disposed, I could narrate some ad ventures in which he shone proudly con spicuous. But, as it would be inconsis tent with the limits of this work to do so, I forbear. None of them however, exhibited qualities of a very exceptionable nature. They were simply the exuberances of a high spirited youth ; the offspring of a mag nanimous disposition ; the natural result of a keen sense of the ridiculous, and a convi vial temperament. In many men they would have been less pardonable. They were to him part of his existence. He gra duated with honor on the 27th of July, 1827, with the regard of his fellow students and the respect of the faculty, and at the public commencement delivered an ora tion which elicited warm encomiums by the elegance of its composition and the elo quence of its delivery. His departure from the institution was regarded by those who knew him, as the breaking up of agreeable associations and the sundering of the plea,-. sant bonds of social intercourse, 18 LIFE OF BARKER. CHAPTER IL Mr. Barker came on to Buffalo with a fearless heart and with a determination to succeed in whatever he might undertake. He arrived in the city about the first of August, 1827, ai;d soon after entered the office of Stephen G. Austin, Esq., a highly respect ibic citizen, as a student at law. While in college, he entered his na-ne as a student in the office of Alonzo C. Paige, Esq., in Schenectady, and on leaving, pro cured a certificate of six months' clerkship. He came into thc city a stranger, but soon gained the esteem of some of the most sub stantial citizens by his industry and appli cation to business, aud noble social qualities. I need not recount his arduous struggles to rise ; — thc difficulties he overcame, nor the courage with which he surmounted obsta cles. Like other students, he sometimes resorted to minor courts, and engaged in the causes which came under their jurisdic tion. He soon attracted public attention by LIFE OP BARKER. 19 his superior oratorica.1 powers, and was regarded as a young man of great promise. Vice President Fillmore and Mr. Barker were frequently employed on opposite sides in these minor courts, and each exerted himself to the utmost. Probably neither then anticipated their subsequent brilliant career. Mr. Fillmore then evinced that great industry and applictition which has since distinguished him, and laid the founda tion of his future eminence. The du 1 routine of Mr. Barker's studies were occasionally enlivened by adventures, some of which I shall notice. In order more fully to appreciate them, and not im bibe from them an erroneous impression, it is perhaps proper for me to state that Buf falo, at that early day, was essentially dif ferent from the present busy emporium. It was then a small but rapidly growing village. It is now a great commercial city of 45,0CO inhabitants. 'J'he harbor did not then as now, present a forest of masts, and nu merous floating steam palaces. The .streets were not as now thronged with a moving mass of life by day, nor illumined by bril- 20 LIFE OF BARKER. liant gas lights at night. The genius of Benjamin Rathbun had not then adorned it with edifices, which in architectural beauty fend size compare favorably with those in older cities. Block after block of stately warehouses, and splendid private residences were not as now observed on all sides. None then living anticipated the rapid ad vances the city has since made in popula tion, business and wealth. In other respects there was a difference. The want of lite rary institutions like the Young Men's As- cociation, was felt by the young men, and the customs of the time were such as ordi narily pertain to a newly settled town. There is in every man's life a period when he acts from impulse. Youth, it is conceded, is generally that period. Then, if at all, do the passions master the judgment. The subjoined incident has been kindly furnished by an intimate friend of deceased; — a gentleman of high respectability; — one who was alike his friend in youth and in after life when honors clustered around him. He was a participator also in the adventure. It illustrates his power to engage and entertain LIFE OF BARKER. 21 under most unpropitious circumstances, by his extraordinary command of language, his eloquent descriptive powers, his wit, his address and manly bearing : "On one occasion, some eighteen years ago. Barker and another young gentleman with myself, got up a sleigh ride and invited ten young ladies to go with us in a large stage sleigh to Hamburgh, some twelve miles out. We started late in the after noon, intending to return in thc evening after supper. Our ride out and sojourn at the public house there, was exceedingly enlivened by Barker's inexhaustible fund of wit and humor. But before we were ready to return there came on a most vio lent storm of snow and wind, which dam pened the ardor and alarmed some of the more timid of the young ladies. We however sallied forth to return about ten o'clock ; — ten young ladies and three gen tlemen crowded into one sleigh; — full of glee and animation, though the storm was unu sually violent, even for this lake shore. After proceeding a mile or two, the driv er lost his road, and wandered far out of 3 22 LIFE OF BARKER. his way, so that after some three hours drive over roads almost entirely obstructed by the drifting snow, we came to a dead halt in an open field, without the power of going another foot, and as we afterwards learned, some six miles out of our way in the town of Boston, a mile or more from any house, the weather intensely cold, with the storm and darkness increasing if possible. It was then that we all drew on Barker's resources to cheer, animate and encourage the ladies under the exigencies of the case, which had really become no joke. They all had to get out into the snow knee deep, so that we men, with the driver could lift the sleigh round, and get the horses again attached, taking our back track with a vieAv of finding some habitation, as it had become abso lutely necessary to keep from perishing. We at length reached a farm-house, roused the family, got a fire made, and our girls restored to life, and a pilot to conduct us on our right road. We reached a public house at Potter's Corners between two and three o'clock, when we stopped and took another supper and then pursued our way LIFE OF BARKER. 23 home, reaching Buffalo a little after sunrise, with the thermometer below zero, nearer dead than alive. But in all the trouble and difficulty here related, our drafts on Barker were not dishonored ; he was the life of the party. Amid all the suflfering and alarm of the young ladies, he would more than half the time keep them in a roar of laughter by his wit and humor. " Of this party of thirteen individuals, at this famous sleigh ride, which has ever been regarded by us all as an event of con siderable importance in our lives, and always spoken of with much interest by ourselves and friends who were at the time acquainted with the facts, several of them have since died, several others are married and live here, and others are scattered about in various parts of the country, and will read ily recognize this sketch of that sleigh ride to Hamburgh with Barker." The same gentleman says : " During my intercourse with Mr. Barker of some twen ty years, we have passed through many scenes together of mirth and frolic, scenes of business of much importance, and sea- 24 LIFE OF BARKER. sons of sickness, trouble and great diffi culty, and I have ever found him the same kind hearted friend, the same judicious counselor, and the same high minded, hon orable man." It may not be considered irrelevant, that I should now advert to the least attractive features in the character of him I am en deavoring to delineate. It is not surprising that a difference of opinion should exist as to the province of a biographer. All whose good opinion I most desire to retain, agree with me, that a fulsome eulogy is excep tionable. But all are not agreed, as to the course to be pursued to avoid subjecting myself to the charge of indiscriminate praise. My view of it, however, is, that other than a general allusion to the excep tionable characteristics of the subject of my memoir, I should particularly confine my self to giving, as fully and accurately as possible, his professional and political his tory. I have endeavored to conform to this opinion in a satisfactory manner. I ha^ e only deviated from it by introducing inci dents illustrative of qualities we can all LIFE OP BARKER. 25 commend. I am conscious that Mr. Barker had faults, for who has not? But, com pared with his virtues they were insignifi cant. Whatever may have been their nature, they were never justified, and in tho latter period of his life were deeply regret ted. I do not deem it necessary to define them. I ask no one to imitate other than his virtues. In considering some adventures of his life, all the accompanying circum stances should be weighed. The period when they occurred — the character of the customs which prevailed at the time — the peculiar disposition and attributes of the man and his after conduct. As to thc particular character of them, it is of no consequence. The great point to be considered is, from whence did they ema nate? Were they afterwards regretted? Were they ever justified? With these observations I shall take leave of this sub ject. I am conscious of my own rectitude in making these allusions, and think they are alike due to myself and him to whom they relate. 3* 26 LIFE OF BARKER. Youth, hilarity and freedom from care are generally associated together. In after years, when man reaches maturity and old age, he often looks back with peculiar emo tions to the golden hours of his youth. Its pleasures and its thousand glorious remi niscences are still dear to him and he cher ishes their recollection as he would the memory of a pleasant dream. Social pastimes, however, did not divert Mr. Barker's attention from subjects of more moment. These sufficed but for his leisure hours. His intellect craved something more substantial. Previous to his leaving college he had taken no active part in the politics of the day, being devoted entirely to the prosecution of his studies. It may readily be conceived, however, that his ac tive and intelligent mind could not long remain indifferent to the great questions of state which have divided and agitated the public mind from the foundation of the government ; nor that he could refrain from being an ac.tor in the great political strife for power and principle going on around him. He had", accordingly, investigated the LIFE OP BARKER. 27 origin of parties ; carefully marked their distinctive characteristics, and from reason, conviction and inclination, he had early at tached himself to the principles of demo cracy. At the time of his arrival in Buffalo, the. state was agitated by the conflicting strife of three political parties — the Jackson or democratic, the National Republican, and anti-masonic parties. In the Eighth District, the anti-masonic party prevailed by a large majority over both the others ; the National Republican party was next in numerical strength, and the Jackson or democratic party was the smallest of the three. Actuated by no motive but princi ple, Mr. Barker did not hesitate in which of the three parties to enroll himself. Re gardless of interests immediate or remote, and fully sensible of the hopeless minority ofthe democratic party in this section he fearlessly enrolled himself in its ranks, and with all his energy, zeal and ability, entered into the support of Gen. Jackson, and the principles of democracy. He wrote leading editorials during the cam paign, for the Buffalo Republican, the first 28 LIFE OF BARKER. democratic paper published in this city, and also furnished political communications for the same paper, over the signature of " Amor Patria. " He likewise, though not upon the committee appointed to prepare it, wrote the first address issued to the electors of this county by a democratic convention. The Jackson party, as the democratic masses were styled, numbered then but a small band against the over whelming majority ofthe dominant party in this section, but it was the nucleus, around which the democracy have since been rally ing, and their " Corporal's Guard " of those times has often subsequently proved that the phalanx of their opponents is not invin- cibls. The address then penned by Mr. Barker, is rather to be regarded as a foil to the splendid efforts of his after career, than as a production giving evidence of those great abilities that so shortly after wards were commandingly developed. It was made a mark to be shot at by the news paper scribblers of the day, who were par ticularly severe in their anima^d ver sions. The address, was, in truth, metaphorical to LIFE OF BARKER. 29 a fault, declamative rather than argumenta tive in style, and more in the " Sophomore" vein than consistent with the grave nature of a declaration of political principles. It was of the imagination rather than the reason — but gave evidence, even in its unpruned luxuriance, of that feitility of ge nius, which, in after years, when time and opportunity had developed and cultivated his native powers, made Mr. Barker the elo quent orator. In the excitement of the political war fare which grew out of the anti-masonic controversy, there were many bitter things said on both sides. Mr. Barker was parti cularly happy in repelling invectives of this character, by the severe retort, or the un answerable sarcasm. On one occasion, when an opponent was denouncing Gen. Washington and other great men of thc revolution for having countenanced the " mummeries of masonry," Mr. Barker replied : " Why, sir, a single kick from one of those illustrious men, would have immor talized you." I have often heard Mr. Barker encourage 30 LIFE OF BARKER. his political friends to renewed exertions during the dark campaign of 1840, and at the first inception of the division of the party in this state, b}'^ reciting the events which transpired in this county in 1828, when the Jackson party was formed. He said the first Jackson meeting ever con vened in this city was attended by only seven persons, but they pressed forward and made regular nominations for all offices in the county. A large hand-bill contain ing the nominations was printed, surmount ed by an eagle large enough to protect a con tinent. He mounted a gaunt nag with ample saddle bags filled with the democra tic posting bills and thus commenced his first political pilgrimage in this county, bouyant in youthful spirits and firm in pur pose, determined that the people here at least should have an opportunity to see democratic nominations, if they could not appreciate them. Nothing occurred to dis turb his quiet avocations until he arrived I believe at Boston Corners. There he found a bar-room filled with village poli ticians debating the heinous crime of voting LIFE OP BARKER. 31 or giving countenance to the democratic ticket. Mr. Barker with the coolness which was often manifest in his character, approached the landlord and suggested that he had a hand-bill which he wished to put up. The landlord, without knowing the nature of the missile, readily consented. He then commenced unrolling the ample folds of the printed eagle and nailed the same at the top of the wall and then fol lowed along down the democratic nomina tion, and as he drove the nails into the lower part of the bill the sound was more dismal to the audience, than was the ham mer ofthe celebrated Luther to the Catho lic Bishops, when he nailed his creed to the door of the cathedral at Wittemberg. The audacity of the tall and graceful young democrat for a time confounded the anti- masonic congregation, and silence reigned. But, finally, after a long and breathless pause, a man of gigantic proportions, with a " huge paw " well suited to the size of the eagle, brought down with one fell swoop the bird of Jove and the democratic nomi nations. The blood of young Barker was 32 LIFE OF BARKER. aroused at the indignity and as quick as thought he precipitated the hammer at the head of the intruder which brought him to the floor on the democratic platform which he had so ruthlessly torn from the wall. " Then commenced in that little bar-room" said Mr. Barker, " the contest between the anti-masonic and democratic parties, with the proportion of thirty to one." After a few interchanges of bar-room courtesies Mr. Barker, through the intercession of the landlord made a compromise with his as sailants, but a number of the actors bore away on their eyes marks of the democra tic influence. When Mr. Barker was pre pared to leave, he found that his horse which had been fastened at the door had been turned loose and had Avended his way home alone and when found was shorn of his tail and mane and bedaubed in a man ner I cannot describe. The saddle bags and democratic handbills, saddle and bri dle were discovered hanging at the top of the sign post and found guilty of high trea son against anti-masonry. The manner in which he would relate LIFE OF BARKER. incidents like the above reached the hearts of his hearers and revived the drooping spirits of his political associates. The election of 1828 resulted, as is well known, in the entire defeat of national republicanism and anti-masonry, and the triumph throughout this state and the United States was complete. And to this result, Mr. iiarker contributed in no trifling degree. He was admitted to the bar in 1830, and commenced on the regular practice of his profession. Immediately after his admis sion, he entered into a co-partnership with S. G. Austin, Esq. The bar of Erie county at that time, comprised as much talent and learning, as perhaps any other of equal number in the state ; and Mr. Barke/ had besides to contend against the odds of well established reputations, powerful connec tions, and settled business. He was, howe ver, undaunted. He entered upon practice with the same untiring diligence and energy which distinguished him as a student, and he rose rapidly to the rank of the very first. He was appointed clerk of the village of 4 34 LIFE OF BARKER. Buffalo, on the 2nd of .]unc,1829. In 1831, he was for the first time brought before the people for an elective office. He was nom inated by the democratic party of the county for member of assembly. The election was not a general one, and no important questions were before the elec tors to call out a full vote. He neverthe less, obtained a handsome majority in the city, and the opposition majority in the county scarcely exceeded eight hundred. This vote, when the attendant circumstan ces are considered, evinced his popularity in an eminent degree. His youth ; his bril liant talents; his great personal popularity, and his ambition rendered him an object of envy to older politicians and they put forth every exertion to secure his defeat. There was also a strong and confident majority to contend against. The official canvass was as follows : — Horace Clark, anti-mason, 2287; William Mills, do., 2066 ;— George P. Barker, democrat, 1459 ; Calvin Bishop, do., 1216. In June, 1832, the co-partnership which had existed from 1830 between S. G. A us- LIFE OP BARKER. 35 tin, Esq., and Mr. Barker, was dissolved, and a co-partnership was formed with John T. Hudson, Esq., under the firm of Barker and Hudson. This partnership continued until April, 1836. He w:is appointed Attor ney for the city of Buffalo in 183:^. He was the first Attorney of the city. The same year, as soon as the rule of court permitted he was admitted to the degree of Counselor, and immediately after was ap pointed District Attorney of the county. The duties of thc office were then, as now, extremely arduous and responsible. The criminal business transacted in ICrie county, and which of course comes under the super vision of thc prosecuting officer, is greater than in any county in the state. New York alone excepted. Rlr. Barker made a fear less and able officer, and discharged his duties in a manner alike creditable to him self and satisfactory to the community. He in fact, laid the foundation for a higher legal position. I shall here briefly notice the imperial manner in which Mr, Barker ad dressed a jury. Thc annals of Western New York do not furnish his equal in that 36 LIFE OF BARKER. respect. Although he could enchain a popular assemblage by the vigor and beauty of his declamation, his forte was before a jury. With a tall and commanding person, he united the rare qualities of a melodious voice of great power and discipline. His pronunciation, although occasionally orna mental, was generally correct, and his com mand of language wonderful. His figures were always striking and oftentimes ex tremely brilliant. His manner was ani mated and impassioned. He portrayed the passions with an artist's fidelity. He thrilled by his towering declamation, fasci nated by his persuasive powers; moved by his pathos ; his " gentlemen of the jury " once heard could not be forgotten. He was effective both in the defense and in the prosecution. Indeed, many ofhis inti mate friends in the legal profession are undecided where he shone best — in the attack or defense. His efforts were gene rally crowned with success. He seized upon the prominent features of a case at once, and then presented them with great perspicuity. In the retort he was ever LIFE OF BARKER. 37 ready. He loved a joke. He indulg ed his facetiae sometimes, even at the peril of his cause. His splendid efforts before juries are deserving of a better eulogy thtm I can give. Though few are in print, tho name of those engraven on the memory ofour citizens, is legion. Mr. Barker discharged the duties of his office until the December term of the com mon pleas in 1836, when he resigned, and Hon. Henry K. Smith vvas appointed his successor. Mr. Smith held the office until the 7th June, 1837, when Henry W. Rogers, Esq., Avas appointed. Mr. Rogers after serving two terms was succeeded by S. G. Haven, Esq., in Juno^ 1843. Each of these gentlemen are well known as able lawyers, and severally performed their duties in a satisfactory manner. In the summer of 1834, Mr. Barker was married to Miss Abby Coit, a lady of high respectability and very fair accomplish ments. This connection was productive of much happiness which was unbroken until Mr. Barker's death. Mrs. Barker is a sister of George Coit, Esq., one of our 4* 38 LIFE OP BARKER. oldest and most respectable citizens. After her husband's demise, she returned to her relatives at Norwich, Connecticut. In the fall of the same year, Mr. Barker was nominated for congress by the demo cratic party. This, it will be recollected, was the panic year. The election was a general one; party lines were strictly drawn, political feelings ran high and the opposi tion exerted their utmost strength. Mr. Barker's friends entertained no hopes of success ; — indeed, defeat seemed inevitable. He notwithstanding, received two hundred more votes than any other candidate on the democratic ticket, and his opponent was elected by nearly three hundred less votes than any other candidate on the oppi- sition ticket. The official canvass shows the following: — Thomas C. Love, anti- mason, 4783 ; George P. Barker, democrat, 2466. LIFE OF BARKER. 39 CHAPTER III. I have thus far chronicled Mr. Barker's defeat as a candidate for public favor. I have now to speak of his success. Un daunted by previous trials; unshaken in their high estimation of their favorite; — unawcd by the overwhelming anti-masonic majority in the county against them, Mr. Barker's political and personal friends again placed him in nomination for the assembly in the fall of 1835. They gathered around and bore him triumphant'y through the contest. It was a severe one. His splen did abilities and great personal popularity rendered his defeat " a consummation de voutly to be wished." Every thing was brought to bear against him which inge nuity, hatred and envy could devise. His strength with the people, however, was too great to be overcome. His star was in 40 LIFE OF BARKER. the ascendant. The canvass resulted in his election by the very handsome majority of 1180! In the city of Buffalo, his residence, where of course he was best known, and where the great strength and influence ofthe opposition principally lay, out of a poll of about 1900 votes he receiv ed a majority of 1212 ! The vote in the county was as follows : — George P. Barker, (democrat,) 3400; Chauncey Hastings, do., 2442;— Noah P. Sprague, (whig,) 2220; Wells Brooks, do., 2652. Thus, in thc 28th year of his age ; in the zenith of his intellect, he was called to take part in the Legislation of the Empire State ! Subsequent events fully demonstrated that his friends had rightly estimated his abili ties. His legislative career reflected honor on Western New York, and placed his fame beyond the reach of envy and calumny. The November election in 1835 was not very sharply contested in most of the coun ties in the state. It as usual resulted in favor of the democratic party. The fol lowing senators Avere chosen : — From the First District, Henry Floyd Jones, LIFE OP BARKER. 41 Fi'om the Second District, Ebenezer Lounsbury, and John Hunter; Third do., James Powers ; Fourth, do., David Spraker; Fifth do., David Wager and Micah Ster ling ; Sixth do., George Huntington ; Sev enth do., John Beardsley ; Eighth do., Chauncey J. Fox. All of these were elected on the reorular democratic ticket, except Mr. Fox, of the eighth district, who was a whig. Mr. Fox was elected by a majoritj^ which did not much exceed 160. The Legislature met on the 5th of January, 1S36. Both branches were strongly democratic. Hon. John Tracy, Lieutenant Governor, made an able presid ing officer in the senate. Hon. Charles Humphrey, was re-elected speaker of the House and presided with dignity. By the proceedings of a caucus of the democratic members ofthe House, held for the purpose of nominating off;cers for the session, I per ceive General Lockwood, of Westchester, presided, and Mr. Barker of Erie, and Mr. Wetmore, of New York, were Secretaries. One hundred and five members were pre- 42 LIFE OP BARKER. sent and ansv/ered to their names. Gover nor Marcy's annual message was communi cated to both houses on the 5th. The Albany Jlrgus, of the 5th, speaking of it, says : " The topics of more direct interest and importance — the increase of the bank ing capital of the state, internal improve ments, relief to the city of New York under the recent calamitous fire, and the move ments and designs of the .abolitionists, par ticularly the latter, — are treated wdth great fullness, and with a frankness and directness of manner, becoming the occasion and the subject, and worthy of the character of a chief magistrate who has devoted all his energies, during an able and prosperous admiaistration of the government, to the promotion oT the Avelfare of the people." The governor communicated on the 6th, a special message to both houses on the subject of the Great Fire in New York city in December, 1835, by which immense loss of property was sustained and great suffer ing brought upon thousands. The citizens of New York had previously appointed Messrs. Philip Hone, Daniel Jackson, James LIFE OP BARKER. 43 B. Murray, and Charles Augustus Davis, a committee to wait upon His Excellency and endeavor to obtain legislative relief for the city. The Message and accompanying docu ments were referred to a joint committee as follows : — Messrs. Van Schaick, L. Beards- ley and Wager of the senate, and Messrs. Wetmore, Dayan, M. H. Sibley, Luther Bradish and G. P. Barker of the assembly. Among the standing committees of the session, Mr. Barker's name appears as fol lows : On ways and means. — Messrs. Dayan, Morgan, G. P. Barker, D. L. Seymour, Carroll. On Colleges, Academies and Common Schools. — Messrs. Wetmore, Duane, G. P. Barker, Yates and Bradish. He was also a member of the joint select committee on so much ofthe Governor's mes sage, as related to the constitutional rights and safety of the States in relation to do mestic slavery. It consisted of Messrs. Mack, Wager and Willes of the senate, and Messrs. Judd, G. P. Barker, Duane, 44 LIFE OF BARKER. Cowdrey and Tomlinson, of the assembly. Before alluding at length to Mr. Barker's legislative career, I shall briefly describe some of the more prominent members, and certainly, it comprised much more than ordinary ability. In the senate there were several demo cratic members of decided ability, although since the withdrawal of Mr. N. P.. Tall- MADGE, elected to the United States senate, there was no one to whom the character of tho leader of the party in that body was generally accorded. Among them I may name Mr. Young of Saratoga, and Mr. Beardsley of Otsego. Of Mr. YoUiVG it is scarcely necessary to speak, for having filled for many years im portant public stations he is well known as a man of genius and extensive attainments. Mr. Beardsley was a shrewd and skilfull legislator, who, without pretentions to elo quence exercised a prominent influence on all important subjects to which his attention was directed. Several other members of the senate on the democratic side might also be referred LIFE OP BARKER. 45 to in this connection, if my limits would jus tify the introduction of all who possessed considerable ability and distinction. There were but four opposition members in the senate and they were all from the eighth district. Albert H. Tracy, of Buffalo, stood con fessedly in the front rank in the senate. Mr. Tracy, is a proud example of the suc cess, which in this country rewards well directed effort aid honorable ambition. He is truly the architect of his ov/n fortune. As long ago as 1818, he represented in Congress, the district which then comprised the counties of Allegany, Cattaraugus, Chau- taque, Ontario, Genesee and Niagara. Since then, however, Erie, Orleans, Mon roe, Seneca, Wyoming and Yates have been formed from it, and several new dis tricts created. He was but twenty five years of age at the time of his election, but so great was his industry and application to the practical duties of legislation, that he was elected three successive terms. In 1829, he was first elected to the senate of this state and at once took a high position. His ex- 5 46 LIFE OP BARKER. perience in parliamentary usages ; his great industry; his clear mind; his sound judg ment and prepossessing manners, won for him a senatorial reputation Avhich must be enduring. He was re-elected in 1833, as an anti-mason, and during his whole term fully sustained his reputation. Mr. Tracy, by his powers of comprehension ; his acuteness ; his high character and capacity for business is indisputably qualified for a much higher position than he has yet filled. He possesses a highly cultivated mind, and his style as a speaker and writer, is forci ble and elegant. Mr. Fox, was an industrious member, and is a man of fine talents. On the democratic side, in the House, Preston King, of St. Lawrence, first claims my attention. He was an industrious and valuable member, and displayed during the session of '36, that skill and tact for which he has since become so widely distinguished. Though not an orator, he is still a ready and forcible debater. His congressional career has placed him in a high rank as a politician, and he is known throughout the LIFE OF BARKER. 47 Union as the able defender of the Wilmot Proviso. Horace Gay, of Monroe, was a useful member. He is a gentlemen of integrity, very fair legal attainments and possesses literary acquirements of no common order. He was a warm personal friend of Mr. Barker, and now speaks feelingly of their intimacy. He still resides in the city of Rochester. John Chamberlain, of Orleans, w-as elected in a county opposed to him in poli tics, owing to his personal popularity. He did not speak often, but when he did, it was with great effect. In his personal appear ance, he was a unique character. Negligent in dress ; his every joint moved with a loose and irregular motion ; his frame was stooping, and he had about him an air of abstraction that marked him for an original. At times, however, he would raise his bent form to an erect attitude, and become the accomplished orator. His voice was clear and musical, and his manner brilliant and impassioned. Great as was his mind, it had important defects. He was sometimes 48 LIFE OF BARKER, haunted with fits of misanthropy and mel ancholy. He Avas prostrated by disease for a number of years, and finally emigrated to an obscure portion of Illinois, where his talents, which might have been the admi ration of his fellow citizens, remain un known and unappreciated. Francis B. Cutting and Prosper M. Wetmore, of New York and Mr. Dayan, of Lewis, were active and valuable members and are deserving of a more extended notice than my limits will permit. Prominent among the opposition mem bers of the House, was Luther Bradish, then of Franklin county, and now of New York city. Dignified and courteous in debate, possessing excellent judgment, and an enviable reputation for integrity, he has ever ranked high in the estimation of his political friends and enjoys in a great degree the respect of his opponents. Mark H. Sibley, of Ontario, is a ready and accomplished debater and first rate laAvyer. He Avas elected to congress in '36, and Avas a member of the senate of this state in '39. He has displayed ability in LIFE OF BARKER. 49 all these positions and was an active mem ber during the session. George W. Patterson, of Chautauque, (now lieutenant governor of the state,) is a man of intelligence and an able legislator. He was first elected to the assembly in 1832. He represented Livingston in '36, and was an active and very useful member. He was also speaker of the house during the session of '39. Mr. Patterson's career thus far has been honorable to himself and creditable to his political friends. Richard P. Marvin, of Chautauque, is well known to our citizens as one of the supreme court justices of the eighth judicial district. He was a member of the consti tutional convention in 1846, and, as a mem ber of congress, creditably sustained himself. He is a man of good talents, and possesses uncommon industry. These gentlemen are by no means all on the opposition side who were members dur ing the session, nor are they all who are deserving a notice. It would not be con sistent, however, with my limits to extend this portion of the work. 5* 50 LIFE OF BARKER. It was among such men as I have feebly attempted to sketch, that Mr. Barker ac quired his legislative reputation. But his fine oratorical powers; excellent discretion ; agreeable manners, and integrity of pur pose, at once enabled him not only suc cessfully to compete Avith them, but also to take and maintain a prominent position. I am sustained by incontestible evidence, in pronouncing him one of the very first members ofthe House in 1836.* The first remarks he made in the House of which any record are to be found, were made in committee of the whole, on Saturday, Janu ary 16th, on the "Bill for the Relief of the city of New York." The question pending was on the substitute proposed by Mr. Bradish for the 3d section. I copy from the Argus -. He said, " that although a member of the select committee which reported this *Tn obtaining the materials for this portion of his life, lam much indebted to the courtesies of the Librarian of the Young Men's Association, of Buffalo, in furnishing me with the files of the Albany Argus, Buffalo Republican, and other papers and documents ; and to several gentlemen who were members during the session. LIFE OP BARKER. 51 bill, he thought it fair to state, and he wished to advertise that committee that he had no particular parental feeling for it ; but although he feared that the main object of it might be lost sight of in attempting to perfect it — he for one, after some reflection, had concluded lo support this section. If he had erred in that conclusion, on him rested the responsibility ; nor had he any wish — he could have none — to influence the least action of the house, unless dictated by the intelligence and purity which ought always to guide their deliberations. He had no part to play in the matter; no point to gain, ex cept simply to discharge his duty as a mem ber of the select committee which reported the bill. With respect to the amendments he proposed, he had only to say that he was not tenacious of the details of the bill, provided the house did not undertake to play Hamlet with Hamlet out. If the main object of the bill — the relief of the city of New York, and indirectly the relief of the whole state — were preserved, then his ob ject would have been accomplished. " His friend from St. Lawrence (Mr.King,) 52 LIFE OP BARKER. proposed to strike out this 3d section. He knew that gentleman too well to distrust his motives. He had known him too long to treat with disrespect any suggestion ofhis. But in this instance, it had been already shown, that his proposition went to destroy the vital principle of the bill, and that the alternative which he suggested would not meet the emergency. As to the objection of the gentleman from New York, (Mr. Cowdrey) that we were giving more, as he believed, than the case required, he appeal ed to the delegation from that city to say whether they knew or could know the ex tent of the wants of the metropolis, under this calamity? The records of the past furnished no precedent to guide us in the estimate ; but all knew that it required more to raise than to sustain; that as the Speaker had well said, this credit, was a matter of faith, and that if we acted at all we must act in that bold and decided man ner which could alone set this matter entire ly at rest. And did gentlemen think to avoid responsibility there? Let such re member that there was a sin of omission as LIFE OP BARKER. 53 great and more unpardonable than the sin of commission. If the house hesitated at this measure of relief he begged leave to remind them that it would be quite as cen surable and more unpardonable than if from the best feelings of the heart they should go too far. " He asked those who presumed to esti mate — for no one would presume to mea sure, the extent of the calamity which had befallen the city of New York — how they could judge of the wants of that city in all their aspects and varieties, except frora the representations before the house ? Those representations came from a body of citi zens, to whose intelligence and high char acter he desired there to bear his testimony, and whose conduct evinced throughout all their intercourse with the committee of the house, a scrupulous desire to ask nothing which the occasion did not absolutely demand. With respect to the amount of relief, the house had no guide but that fur nished by the committee of citizens, and the only alternative presented was to act, if we acted at all, with the magnanimity and 54 LIFE OP BARKER. liberality which the occasion seemed to call at the hands of the legislature. And at all events, so to act that we might not hereafter be reproached with having been guided by a contracted spirit. "As to the preference expressed for a permanent increase of banking capital, although not opposed to that course on the principle advanced by one of the gentle men from N. Y. (Mr. Cutting) although he came there with no religious, moral or legal scruples against banks, more than anything else ; yet he had not that ethical lens Avhich some gentlemen seemed to have, which enabled them to discuss the differ ence in point of principle between a perma nent and temporary increase of banking capital, and by which others affected to dis cover their right as legislators to disregard the real wants of one section of the state. He could vote as freely and cheerfully for a bank, provided the public interest did not conflict with it, as he Avould vote forthe erec tion of a bridge. " He Avas aAvare that perhaps something had been said in the course of this discus- LIFE OP BARKER. 55 sion, which might be thought extraneous, considering the subject in debate ; but he trusted he might be indulged — and after the able remarks of the Speaker he did not feel justified in detaining the house much longer, with a feAv remarks with reference to the matters to which their attention had been called. He asked the gentleman frora Ncav York, (Mr. Cutting) and in a spirit of kind ness, where he founded his opposition to banks in cases where banks were required? Was it because the system adopted by this state had anything peculiar iu its features to excite distrust? Had not that system withstood the attacks of its enemies and the more dangerous sort of support — the faint praise of its friends ? And what would be the effect of a contracted, artificial, unna tural repugnance to an extension of the banking capital of New York, whilst for eign states were holding out more fruitful fields of speculation, and when men of capi tal were already driven by the paucity of banking facilities in their own state, to seek investments elsewhere? — The effect must be in the end, to render us dependent on 56 LIFE OF BARKER. foreign banks, and to drive from this state a vast amount of capital, actually required here, and to place it where it would be ex empt from taxation. "One word in reply to the gentleman from Ulster, (Mr. Romeyn,) for whom he entertained certainly no feeling of unkind- ness or disrespect. He felt constrained to ask that gentleman, Avhether, in his denun ciations of all appeals to the passions and feelings of members, he had not himself made a direct appeal to the passions and jealousies of that house, when he travelled out of his way to warn the committee that after New York had obtained the facilities contemplated by this bill, the New York delegation might turn round upon the coun try and say that enough had been already granted and that they would grant no more. For himself, he had only to say to that gentleman, and to the New York delega tion, that although the humble portion of the state which he in part represented had as anxious an eye to the action of that legislature as any other section, and that although there are all that he had or hoped LIFE OF BARKER. 57 to have was centered — yet that even could he know that the Ncav York delegation Would oppose every application from his constituents — still he begged leave to tell them that they had nothing to fear from him, and for that reason, and that he should dis charge his duty regardless of the conse quences. He appealed to the gentleman from Ulster to say whether AA'hen he took his oath before that table to do his duty as a legislator, he swore that he would do it, provided the New York delegation did their's also ? If the representatives from New York should oppose every object in which he might be interested, he could find no relief in that circumstance, from the obli gation resting on him to do his duty, not merely as a representative of a single sec tion, but of the whole state. His constit uents did not send him there to play a a game of rush for legislative favors, at the expense of New York and the integrity of the house; believing that the legislature would give them all that their situation re quired without a resort to such means. If he were to assume to serve them by pitting 58 LIFE OF BARKER. himself against a particular section of the state, supposed to be unfriendly to his pro jects, his constituents Avould be misrepre sented there. He could not enter upon such a course. " The gentleman from Ulster as he said, had brought to this question the experience of foity and three years, and a mind disci plined by professional studies. He (Mr.B.) left it to the house to say, judging from the gentleman's matter, (for he would not speak of his manner) Avhether in the period of these forty and three years, the fire and ardor of his youth were quite extinguished. For no man he presumed on that floor would have imagined, but for the gentle man's explanation of his remarks, that when he tinkered the heavens into brass and the earth into iron, he intended to allude to the western deluge. If it would relieve the gent's illustration in the least, he would tell him that on the spot they did not think it much of a shower after all. Nor need he be alarmed for the west on that score, for it could not well be supposed that thc ques tion now before the house, or any other act LIFE OF BARKER. 59 of legislation, could affect the season alluded to, especially as that season had passed. When that case should come up, with a vicAvto relief, then perhaps the figures ofthe gentleman might be in good taste ; but here they could hardly be considered applicable. He agreed Avith the Speaker that the effect of this bill was not confined to the city of New York. He did not ask the represen tatives of that city to concede anything in return. He stood there as the representa tive of his immediate constituents, it was true,.and he considered it fortunate for them that the;f believed their interests as well as those of the state, to be identified too intimately with the prosperity of New York. to be induced to go into the suicidal policy of cutting off the body to retain the limbs. As the gentleman from Ulster Avas at home on classic ground, he begged leave to call to his recollection, in illustration of his course on this bill, the old Roman story, where the limbs entered into a conspiracy that they Avould no longer support the slug gish belly, and to ask him whether his at tempts to excite a country feeling against 60 LIFE OP BARKER. the city, would not if he found a response there, prove equally absurd and destructive to the interests of the Avhole ? But he would not detain the committee longer at that late hour ; nor did he believe it to be ne cessary Avere it in his power to say any thing in aid of the appeals which had already been made to the house. But he Avould ask merabers frora every section of the state to bury under a comraon regard for the common good, all sectional or personal feelings, and to come forward and discharge their duty independently, and under the responsibilities Avhieh they owed to them selves, their constituents and the whole state." The Argus, ofthe 6th February, says: "The material Ncav York relief bill, was finally passed yesterday and has become a laAv. The Assembly concurred in the amendments of the Senate chiefly (striking out tho second section) by a vote of 101 to 5. The bill among other provisions, au thorises the banks in the city of New York to loan for two years a sura equal to one-half of their capitals respectively, and to dis count upon it as capital to the amount of LIFE OP BARKER. 61 once and a half of the sum borrowed." In order to explain somewhat the re marks of Mr. Barker, on the bill to " expe dite the construction of a railroad from New York to Lake Erie," I have copied as follows, from the second volume of Mr. Hammond's political history : " On the sub ject of internal improvements Gov. Marcy stated in his annual message that the general fund was entirely exhausted; that the Chenan go Canal would cost, instead of one million, as had been represented, about two millions of dollars, and that the enlargement of the Erie canal would cost at least twelve millions of dollars, and that he protested against pledging the state for any further works of internal improvement, unless the legislature would provide some specific means for the payment of the interest of the money which Avould be required to be borrowed. In the face of these facts, and this solemn Avarning, the legislature passed laws during this session for loaning to the New York and Erie railroad company $3,000,000, and for constructing the Black River and Genesee Valley canals. To these 6* 62 LIFE OP BARKER. measures the majority in the legislature were goaded on by the Avhig ncAvspapers and politicians, who charged them with being governed by narrow vicAvs and a se cret hostility to all internal improvements. Against the assumption of these tremen dous liabilities. Col. Young, Mr. D. Spraker and a few other senators raised their voices, and some feeble efforts Avere raade in the assembly to arrest the progress of these measures, but their exertions Avere Avholly ineffectual." (Mr. Barker's remarks in the Assembly on the 20th of February, on an appeal from the decision of the chair, on the final pas sage of the bill to expedite the construction of a rail road frora New York to Lake Erie.) He said, "he felt called upon to explain a remark of his in favor of laying this ques tion on the table, and especially as it had been said that this subject had been long before the house, and that every gentleman should have been long prepared to act upon it. If he had erred in not having brought to this subject the examination which Avas due to it, the responsibility he was aware LIFE OP BARKER. 63 rested on him. — But if he had erred, it was from misrepresentation as to the proper course to be adopted to bring the question before the house. He had supposed that the proper course was to refer it to the standing committee appointed Avith refer ence to their qualifications to examine these questions and he had expected to have been guided by the light Avhich that committee would throAv upon the subject. He assured the gentleman that he had no earthly object in calling for an examination, but to come to an honest conclusion; and although others might be fully satisfied in their own minds on the subject, he could only say that they were more fortunate than he. But opinions were sometimes founded on a partial as well as a thorough examina tion of a subject, and long continued reflec tion sometimes led to doubts where none were entertained before. He knew not what examination those who spoke with so much confidence, had brought to this sub ject, nor was it to be supposed that acting as they did there under a heavy responsi bility, they had expressed a mere off-hand LIFE OP BARKER. opinion. He could only say to such that he acted on his OAvn responsibility there ; and although as the gentleman from Ulster (Mr. Romeyn) had said, a precedent of this kind might lose us the $800,000 loan to the Hudson and Delaware canal company, for one, he had rather lose eight hundred mil lions than to commit an error, on a grave constitutional question like this. Such ar guments had no influence on him. He Avas to act in this case on the lights of his own judgment, and independently of the views hoAvever confidently expressed, of others. What then was the point? It was true as stated by the gentleman from Oswego (though he stated the proposition in a sense perhaps too much restricted) that a corpo ration was a creature of the statute — that it had no powers except such as it derived from the statute. It might be said to live and move and have its being by statute. But he had understood that a corporation had all the powers necessary to a full en joyment of the authority granted. Noav his difficulty as to the power of corporation to a mortgage was this. It was not the design Life op barker. 65 of the legislature or of the corporation, that it should mortgage or convey its real estate. The corporation was to make the road and its powers to raise money for that purpose were prescribed by its charter. It was to be built by the stock subscribed. It never entered into the heart or minds, he trust ed, of this corporation that they Avere to apply for a loan on giving a mortgage. The charter contemplated no such thing. Now here it was proposed that they should loan money and give a mortgage, when the original act of incorporation did not con template that the road should be built in that Avay. However confident others raight be on this subject he appealed to every pro fessional man whose attention had been drawn to this subject to say, whether there was any one subject of judicial investigation, where there was less harmony of decis ion — perhaps he should say Avhere decis ions of courts in this country and in Europe were more at war — than on this subject. There was no analogy between the corpo rations themselves, and no arguments could be draAvn from the one Avhich could be ap- 66 LIFE OP BARKER. plicable here. Nor was it to his mind a perfect answer to the position taken here, to say that the bill merely granted the power to borrow — that it contemplated nothing conventional — that the lien was created by the operation of the law. He asked the gentleman who urged this argu ment, to point out the distinction (for it was too subtle for him) between giving the poAver to execute and sign a bond and mort gage, and creating a conditional lien by ths act itself. Were not the powers of the corporation in effect extended just as much in one case as in the other? If not he had not fully appreciated the argument. As to this being a public act, because thc school fund Avas to be increased by it, he did not think the argument of that conclusive kind that it had been claimed to be ; for it w^as to be supposed that every act of incorporation was intended to benefit indirectly the Avhole state. Still he would not be understood to speak Avith confidence on the question before the house. He had no right to be confident, and he Avas not ashamed to own that without more reflection, he could not LIFE OF BARKER. 67 feel entirely free from doubt. It might well be that the friends of the bifl felt entirely clear upon this subject, but he asked whe ther in a case involving so much doubt, and when it was expected as it was here, that the question would go to the appropriate committee, it was extraordinary that raany should be unprepared to vote. For himself he was sure that the question was not pres sed upon the house with a view to embar rass the bill. If he knew himself, he Avas willing that the bill should pass, if it could pass constitutionally, and he should in that case, say amen to it as heartily as any man on that floor. All he wished Avas to give an honest and intelligent vote on the question." 68 LIFE OF BARKER. CHAPTER IV. Connected with the legislation of 1836, it may be well here to note, that opposition to banking or other monopolies was not then as since, to some extent it has been made, an article in the creed of the demo cratic party in this state. On the contrary, after the adoption by the legislature of the safety fund system, under the recommen dation of Mr. Van Buren, during the short time he was Governor, the protection and extension of that system was regarded ge nerally as an important duty of the demo cratic party, and the multiplication of bank charters occupied a large portion of the time of the legislature, and the distribution of the stock under those charters was re garded as a legitimate means of extending party influence and of rewarding party ser vices. Most of the prominent members of the party, availed themselves of their posi- LIFE OF BARKER. 69 tion of influence, to secure directly or indi rectly a share of the spoils, either in the shape of bank stock or bank offices, and this practice had extended so far, that it is believed, that of the prominent members of the party at this time, either in the legis lature or out of it, very few could be named who were not largely interested in banks. Even Col. Young, whose general integrity could not be doubted, and whose zeal against chartered monopolies has since been conspicuous, at this time had a large portion of his fortune invested in the stock of the safety fund banks. Of course the organs of the party were ready to de nounce as incendiary and disorganizing the movements now beginning to be made by a portion of the democratic party in the city of New York against a then very apparent bank influence. This section of the party, then opprobiously denominated loco foco, small as it was, numerically, embraced, how ever, several men of distinguished ability and courage and sustained by the powerful pen of the late Wm. Leggett, succeeded in making itself heard and felt in the legisla- 7 70 LIFE OP BARKER. tive hall at this session. It Avas the oppo sition of this party to the further extension of banks that Mr. Barker had to encounter in the prosecution of his favorite mea sure, and in his speech, extracts from which now folloAv, if all his positions do not accord with what aftei-Avards came to be recognized as sound democratic principles, it must be borne in m.ind that the}^ Avere the prevailing doctrines of the democratic party of that day. In Assembly, , Tuesday, April 19, Mr. Barker, after some remarks in opposition to the bill to repeal parts of the restraining act — directed not against the measure it self, except so far as it was urged as a sub stitute for, or as an antagonist to the safety fund system — went on to say : — [Argus.] " There is still another point on which I wish to say a few Avords by way of appeal to western members. And on that head let me not be misunderstood. I don't ap peal to them because I suppose they have any interests distinct from the general inte rests. I appeal to them because they know and feel our identity of interest, and be- LIFE OF BARKER. 71 cause they can appreciate Avhat I have to say. And now I ask every western mem ber satisfied as I know every western man must be of thc wants and demands of the people of the west in reference to banking capital, whether he feels justified in attempt ing to evade these demands, under the plea that to gratify them would be but to minis ter to the interests of a few individuals? Let me a'sk Avhetlier the sailor on our lakes don't know the difference between $15 and ^18 a month — Avhether the farmer does not know the difference between six and seven shillings a bushel for his wheat — whether the laborer does not knoAv the difference be tween four and six shillings a day? This is a matter which the people distinctly under stand, and the man who believes that the cry for more banks emanates from the aris tocracy, or from any other source than the back-bone of that section of the state is mistaken. " He knows not western New York, and however honest men may be in supposing that the great body of thc people are crying '«ut against banks, they forget the wide dis- 72 LIFE OP BARKER, tinction which exists betAveen the feeling of indignation everywhere raised against an institution that was at war Avith our own, and to ward off Avhose attacks the strong arm of state poAver was put in requisition — and the safety fund banks of this state. They mistake the intelligence ofthe people, when they undertake to identify the one with the other. They know better and I Avill say that the man Avho strikes a blow at the safety fund system of this state, touches the democracy of this state where they feel most. Yes sir, were I called on now (as I have been) to say Avhat that man had done, who originated that system, the best answer I could make would be to tell the inquirer to open his pocket book and see Avhether he had a safety fund note in it. You mis take if you suppose that this is not a favo rite system, and the raan Avho has taken up a different impression, has derived his opi nions from the mob, and not from the peo ple. And will gentlemen prefer to take for their guide on this subject, the opinions of those Avho are here to-day and there to morrow, or the views of those on AA'hose LIFE OP BARKER. 73 intelligence are suspended the destinies of our country ? " The man who raises his hand against the safety fund system, permit me to say, does it on a responsibility that I do not envy. I will say further that even if thc father of that system, could we suppose a thing so unnatural, (which I cannot) or he who sustained by what is called the six million mortgage, should attempt to crush it, his arm would perish in the effort. The people of this state cannot be trifled with. No man can lend his countenance to a sys tem until the people have experienced its benefits, and then withdraAV it at his plea sure, and at the same time recline on the reputation of having created it. I believe I speak the feelings of the democracy, and I may include also men of all par ties, when I say that the people will never submit to that policy. And on this point, I say no more than I intend, I mean to be so distinctly understood. " I regret that owing to indisposition, I cannot now pursue this subject as far as I intended ; but probably during the course 7* 74 LIFE OF BARKER. of this discussion, I shall have another op portunity, to extend my views. But I do say here — and I address myself again to western men — that however we may differ in political sentiments, there is an interest paramount to that — and that is the duty we owe to Western New York ; — a duty grow ing out of the state of the currency, and the wants of the business community in that section — to which everything else mustbow. Such as choose to sacrifice the interests of the west, either to views of policy or expe diency, must take the responsibility upon themselves. I wash ray hands of it, here and before ray constituents. And I will say for one, (and I hope the majority will sus tain me,) that I never will vote for an ad journment of this house (until another body better able to express the feelings of my constituents shall take our places) — until banking facilities are extended to the west, or every bank charter in the state is repeal ed, I mean all that too Mr. Chairman. In Assembly, Wednesday, April 20, P. M. — The committee of the vvhole Mr. R. L. Smith in the chair had risen and reported LIFE OP BARKER. 75 on Mr. Yates' bill, (in addition to Mr. Cut ting's) and refused to rise and report on the latter. The question Avas on Mr, Wil- kison's motion to strike out the enacting clause, and Mr. Barker and Mr. Marvin had spoken in opposition to the motion. Mr. Barker addressed the committee as follows -. — " Mr. Chairman — as I have once had the floor on this subject, I will not detain the committee with any remarks, except such as seem to be called for as a matter of justice to myself, and in reply to arguments addressed to me personally. The arguments urged in relation to the subject generally, I leave for the present, at least to other members of the committee to answer, confining myself entirely to cer tain allusions Avhich have been thrown out in the course of this debate, connected with me and my course in relation to this bill, to which 1 feel called upon to reply. And in doing this, I would premise by saying to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Cutting) that the sentiments of kindness which he has expressed towards me personally, find in my heart a perfect reciprocity of feeling; 76 LIFE OP BARKER. but that at the same time AA'hile I stand up here for my constituents he, as he conceives, acts for his own, and that our course in re ference to this bill is, in consequence, fated to be different. I vote as I believe the interests of my constituents demand at my hands, and I am not at liberty to com promise them for any feeling of friendship which I raay entertain for any individual. Still, I will say to the gentleman, that were I to be governed in this matter, only by personal predilections, which are my own property and at ray OAvn disposal, and that were it possible for me to be seduced by a man, under the circumstances in which I am placed I Avould, without hesitation, choose him as the seducer. As to the remarks I have made in justifica tion of my course as regards this bill, they are before the committee. They are satis factory to my OAvn mind, and that matter I must justify before my constituents. I propose now, therefore, to confine myself as I promised to the affusions made by the gentleman from New York (Mr. Cutting) to myself, and to the arguments adduced by LIFE OF BARKER. 77 him in reply to Avhat fell from from me yes terday ; I appeal to the gentleman himself to say whether he treated my remarks with perfect fairness Avhen he said the only argu ment I had urged Avas in favor ofthe Buffa lo Bank ? The course of ray argument (if that can be called argument, Avhicli was designed to justify my own mind) was to charge and prove upon the gentleman from Ncav York, in the introduction of his bill, hostility to the increase all banking facilities. I also said and attempted to prove that those Avho advocated this measure and Avho would impose this injunction, were at war with our bank ing system — that this compound monopoly which he and they would introduce, would never be submitted to by the people of this state — and 1 asked the gentleman whether he could furnish a single argument against the increase of banking capital, which did not go to the system itself. That ques tion the gentleman has not yet an swered^ " The gentleman saAv fit in the course of his remarks to say in reference to the with- YS LIFE OP BARKER. drawal of the U. S. branch bank, that he had understood that in 1824, a bank of $400,000 capital Avas granted to Buffalo, having in view the Avithdrawal of that very branch bank. Now, I ask the gentleman from New York, (Mr. Cutting) the gentleman who cal led for argument but gave none — (whether from his need of it, or otherwise is not for mc to say,) conceding the fact that ^400,- 000 was granted to Buffalo, in 1824, by way of banking facilities, because the branch bank Avas to be withdraAvn, Avhether that act gave any more than $400,000 to Buffalo ? No matter Avhat the inducements Avere for the increase of banking fa.cilities in Buffalo, did it make more than ^400,000? Did it do more than supply tbe vacuum oc casioned by the withdrawal, and did it nccessai-ily dispense with any further exten sion of banking facilities to th-at city for all time to come? On this point also 1 shall await a reply from the gcntleraan from New York. The gentleman also remarked, in refer ence to the uncurrent money afloat m Buf falo, that it was a very easy matter to re- LIFE OF BARKER. 79 duce that circulation to specie. Now, I can say that hoAvever applicable the remark may be to the city of New York, it evinces that the gentleman's knoAvledge of the business of western New York is extremely limited. The business men of Buffalo are compelled to go into other states, and almost on their knees, beg of foreign institutions the use of their paper, on condition that they keep it in circulation. Yes, sir, to foreign corpo rations they are compelled to bow. And why? Because the wisdom of their own legislature refuses to minister to their ne cessities. Why, sir, the business man who should undertake to buy up this paper, for the purpose of returning it to its source, would find himself among business men, an outlaw — a traitor to the interests of his brethren in commercial transactions. " And here I must treat the gentleman as a lawyer. I said his argument was adverse to the increase of banking facilities. I plead to his decleration. If I traversed or departed in my plea, as a lawyer he should have demurred. But he saw fit to reply, and on fair legal principles, his argument 80 LIFE OF BARKER. is confessed to have been adverse to the increase of banking facilities. The gen tleman also asked — at the same time saying that he was not opposed to the banking system — that his bill was not adverse to it — why it was that Buffalo and other por tions ofthe state, were now writhing under this policy? Still that was no attack on the system? Sir, it was not the fault of the system itself, but the evil the gentleman alludes to is the result of the want of the extension of the system to meet the con stantly increasing demand for banking fa cilities. As well might you say that be cause a barrel of pork thrown in among a hungry multitude would be productive of serious consequences, from the inadequacy of the supply — that therefore the pork itself is good for nothing. The difficulty is that the system has not been extended sufficient ly at the west; and because it has not been extended to such a degree as to meet the absolute necessities of that section, is that any evidence that the system itself is a bad one? I for one cannot see how the con clusion follows. LIFE OF BARKER. 81 " There is another portion of the gentle man's remarks Avhich I intended to reply to immediately. The gentleman said, in an swer to my appeal to the house on behalf of the Avest that he had shown himself a greater friend to the west than myself. He points to his vote for the Rochester and Olean canal. He points, not to his vote, but to his generosity towards the southern rail road company. Let us examine this subject. And first I have to say to the gen tleman, that notwithstanding all the feelings of partiality I may have for those deeply interested in the Olean canal, and although I do not suppose that my efforts would have altered the determination of the house, in reference to that work, (and viith the result I am content,) yet had I been able to have taken the floor at the time, I should have brought all the capacity which God has given me to bear in opposition to that bill, and let the responsibility of that course and of this avowal rest on mc and upon us in the west. But look at the generosity ofthe gentleman in reference to that bill. The common council of his own city instructed 8 82 LIFE OP BARKER. hrim to A'ote for it. The resolutions of that body were spread upon our tables, pointing out thc advantages which Avould result to the city of New York, from the construc tion of the work ; and it a\ as even pro claimed on this floor, that when that canal shall have been completed, Buffalo would no longer be the " Queen of the West ! " And yet thc gentleman supposes that I Avas recreant to the west, when I gave my vote against that bill, and speaks of it as a merit that he has obeyed the instructions of his common council ! " As to the southern railroad, my course is also before the house, and before my con stituents ; and with them I am content to let it rest. With respect to the gentleman's own course, I should have never inquired into it, had it not been put forward here, as constituting a peculiar claim upon west ern feeling, on the part of the gentleman from New York. Having been thus parad ed here, I may be permitted to remark that if it be true, (as I have no reason to doubt it is) that he has paid $10,000 for stock in that railroad, it is equally true that that LIFE OF BARKER. 83 very railroad was eloquently advocated by a brother colleague of his on this floor, as a measure calculated to bring the whole western trade, without fear of competition, to the city of New York. Did the gentle man (let me ask) look beyond Ncav York for a motive to that subscription ? That is all I have to say on that head ; for I will not say that the gentleman has a large for tune invested there in real estate. To sup pose that consideration had any influence, Avould be to impute selfishness to the gen tleman and that I can never impute to him. " There is another part of the gentle man's (Mr. Cutting's) argument, if it may be called argument, that I regret to refer to; and let it be understood that if I talk with plainness, it is not because anything I have said has left a sting here. I shall treat this as a matter between friend and friend, who stand, in their official capaci ties upon an equal footing on this floor. The remark of mine to Avhich the gentleman alluded, the committee will recollect, I pre faced with another, that I was about to say no more than I meant, and I now add that 84 LIFE OF BARKER. I meant no more than I said. I make that amendment to it. What was the remark I made that called out from the prime min ister (as he would appear to be) of the ad ministration, the sentence of excommunica tion? I said in relation to the safety fund system, that it had come to be a favorite with the democracy of this state. That although it OAved its origin to the favorite Son of this state, it had not commended itself to their regard on that account alone, but that it had been tested by experience, and triumphantly tested. And I said that should that man (and I say so still) deep as may be the channels he has worn to the affections of the people of this state — should that raan I repeat, array himself against the democracy, as to a course of policy Avhich they haA^e at heart (and of this they will judge) — and I say still, though without any apprehensions that matters will ever come to that pass — that the demo cracy will say to that man " thy glory has departed." I take back nothing on that subject. "Sir, (said Mr. B.) let us see whether LIFE OF BARKER. 85 there be anything in this, that would bring me under the ban of the gentleman from New York, (Mr. Cutting.) Let me ask that gentleman, if even that man, who has been well said to have filled " the measure £>( his country's glory" if that same arm which was stretched out at New Orleans in defense of his country, should noAv be raised against that country — if that same voice which was once heard against a powerful monopoly, then preying on the vital inte rests of the country, should now be heard in its support — let me ask the gentleman what Avould be the verdict of the people of this state and ofthe Union? All I meant to say (and I repeat it) was, that that man who supposes that he can array himself against the intelligence of the democracy of this state or of the Union calculates too much on his strength. 1 said, and I say it again, that I acknowledge no power here^ that is paramount to the will of my constituents; and if the gentleman argues from this, that I am about to leave the party, and under takes to say that I can leave the party — I have to reply, that until I leave the people. 8* 86 LIFE OF BARKER. Mr. Cutting: Does the gentleman attri bute such remarks to me? Mr. ^Barker : I understood the gentleman to say something like this — is it to be de clared that because a bank can't be granted, I leave the party? Mr. Cutting : My language was this — that because a bank can't be granted, I leave those I have heretofore supported? Mr. Barker: I say if the people want capital — if the democracy demand it — the representative assumes upon himself too much who undertakes to resist it ; for that voice is omnipotent and Avill always be heard. So far the gentleman understands mc. But I say further, that if we could suppose anything so improbable as that such motives or designs could be charged upon either of the men I have alluded to, (which I utterly deny) — I do say as an ab stract truth and I care not where it touches — that the man Avho arrays himself against thc wishes of the great body of the people, will soon receive his verdict at their hands. Does the gentleman doubt it? Where now is he of Delaware, who once held the LIFE OP BARKER. 87 democracy of this state, as it Avere in the hollow of his hand? By the betrayal and desertion of thc principles of the democra cy, even that man has forfeited their confi dence and is forgotten. Where now is tho promising young man, Avho once represent ed the democracy of the county of Orange? He too has received his verdict. And Avhy? Because he arrayed himself against the wishes of the people and no man can stand against that power. " The gentleman also remarked that we, (the applicants for banks,) were standing here like Swiss soldiers, asking pay for services. The proposition was not stated affirmatively, to be sure, but in the form of an interrogatory, and the remark w^as not less pointed for that reason. Now I can not accord to the gentleman CA-enthe merit of originality in that remark. I have heard it before. It is like a story thrice told in Western Ncav York. It is however, so far original with the gentleman, that I have always been accustomed to hear it from those holding different political principles from those the gentleman himself professes. 88 LIFE OF BARKER. It is not a ncAv song to me. But I have to say to the gentleman that I know not under Avhat power of attorney he assumes to ask whether I am prepared by adhering to the wishes of my constituents, to prove re creant to my faith. I can say that I regard no Avarrant of attorney, unless it be given by the demociacy of Erie, and I invite the gentleman if he wishes to read me out — or as the phrase is, to Vanduzer me — for the remark I made — to lay the venue in the county of Erie, and try the issue before my constituents. That is the only tribunal to which I submit. I have a few words more to say to the gentleman frora New York, and but a few. I asii him with what grace he calls me to account, as recreant to my faith, in advocat ing the extension of banking facilities? By lioAv large a majority of those Avho claim to be democratic members of this house, is he sustained here. Who have stood shoulder to shoulder Avith him in his proposition to repeal the restraining act? I wish no an swer. I mean no disrespect to those Avho differ Avith me in politics, nor should I have LIFE OP BARKER. 89 introduced the topic on this floor; but it having been introduced I am free to speak of it. I wear no screen before my breast, every portal of it is open to the gentleman, and if he pleases he can enter. If I have erred, the gentleman shall not be put to the ti-ouble of taking testimony on the subject. I will argue the question with him on bill and ansAver. If any expression I have used — if any doctrine I have advanced, be het erodox — I ara easy of conviction — for I will furnish on short notice, and at any time, the evidence desired. I say therefore in conclusion to the gen tleman from New York, [and my object in rising now was merely to make myself un derstood on this point,] that Avith a full knoAvledge of all the responsibility of the declaration, I shall go home to my constitu ents as fearlessly as he Avill to his, and Avith the assurance that I have not disobeyed the instructions given by raore than three-fourths of the committee which nominated me. The Argus of May 26th, 1836, sums up the session as follows: — " The legislature of this state adjourned 90 LIFE OP BARKER. this day at 12 o'clock. The session has been one of longer duration, and more ar duous than any which has ever preceded it. It extended to 143 days. The number of acts passed is 536 — a far greater number than has ever been passed at any previous session. Among the laws are comparatively feAv of a public nature. Of these the apportionment bill, under the ncAv census, may be said to have excited as much interest, and to have produced as much discussion as any other. Equal in interest and importance were the bills for internal improvement. Araong these, are the Black River Canal, and fee ders, and the Genesee Valley Canal, and the bill to expedite the construction of the New York and Erie Rail Road. The two former involves an estimated expenditure of about three millions of dollars, and the latter the loan of the credit of the state, in the pro gress and at the completion of the A^^ork to the same amount. The local acts of incorporation for pur poses of internal improvement, extended to no less than forty-tAvo rail road companies, with an immense aggregate capital. LIFE OF BARKER. 91 The question of the incorporation of banks was as usual an engrossing one. The legislative action on this subject resulted in grants for charters of twelve new banks, and an increase of the capitals of two ex isting banks : making an aggregate addition to the banking capital of the state five mil- hons six hundred and seventy thousand. The calamitous fire in the city of New York, — the cause of much legislation early in the session, produced also a species of incorporation heretofore but little known in this state. We allude to the mutual insur ance companies. Of these there were 26 acts passed during the session." 92 LIFE OF BARKER. CHAPTER V. Mr. Barker after the adjournment of the Legislature returned to Buffalo, and em barked with zeal once raore in his profes sional business. In the fall of 1836, he was put in nomination for congress by the de mocratic party. He declined the nomina tion, however, for private reasons, but he sustained Mr. Van Buren and the demo cratic ticket with vigor. In 1837, when Mr. Van Buren's special message was promul gated, he was among the first to give in his cordial support to the statesmanlike views and the bold and vital measures advanced in that admirable document. Though many from whom better things were expected, re ceded at once from the party — men who had been cherished and made by its bounty; — he stood up amid the general defection which surrounded him, and fearlessly and warmly supported the doctrines so patrioti cally presented. LIFE OF BARKER. 93 In April, 1837, Mr. Barker formed a part nership Avith Seth E. Sill and Seth C. Haavley, Esqs., under the firm of Barker, Hawley and Sill. This firm continued till November, 1839, when Mr. Hawley went out, and the firra went on as Barker and Sill, until Mr. Barker was elected attorney gen eral in February, 1842. The business trans acted by this firm was very great, as all of the gentlemen connected Avith it possessed distinguished legal attainments. All of the gentlemen who have at any time been con nected with Mr. Barker as partners, speak in the highest terms of their deceased friend, and warmly commend his virtues and talent. In September, 1838, he was chosen a dele gate from the county of Erie to the demo cratic young men's convention at Utica. This convention was one of the most nu merous, talented and enthusiastic bodies that had ever assembled in the state. Many there present had been distinguished for their tal ents and the public stations they had filled; and in comparison with whom Mr. B., was little known ; the West however, whose ar dent friend and vigilant supporter he had 9 94 LIFE OF BARKER. always been, knew and appreciated his merit and abilities, and with one voice presented hira as the one most worthy to perform the duties of presiding officer. He was accord ingly chosen to preside OA^er this noble rep resentation of the junior democracy. Those who listened to that burst of true eloquence AA'ith which, on assuming the duties of the station, he electrified that vast assemblage ; and who witnessed the dignity and irapar- tiality with which he presided, Avill look back upon the scene as one of the most gratify ing of their lives. This convention dis solved, but each member carried away Avith him admiration for the abilities of its pre siding officer, and regard for his personal qualities. I shall now allude to the military career of Mr. Barker. By the records in the ad jutant general's office, it appears that on the 31st January, 1838, orders were issued, or ganizing five coinpanies of light infantry, under command of captain John J. Fay, George P. Barker, etc., and commissions were issued to the officers of the companies. They were organized into a regiment called LIFE OF BARKER. 95 the 10th regiment of light infantry, and at tached to the 8th brigade of artillery. On the 12th February, 1838, an election was held for field officers, and Mr. Barker was elected major. On the 28th of February, of the same year, general orders were is sued changing the organization of the regi ment to artillery, and commissions were is sued to the field officers of the 37th regi ment of artillery. On the 14th of August, 1838, he Avas elected lieutenant colonel of that regiment, and commissioned as such, September 11th. In June, 1839, he was elected brigadier general of the 8th brigade of artillery, in the place of general Nelson Randall, promoted. At this election, seve ral officers superior in rank, were competi tors, yet so great was his popularity, that he received a large majority of the votes cast. He made a splendid review officer. Indeed, his appearance on horseback was commanding and quite dashy. He continued to hold the office of brigadier general until his appointment as attorney general. It is perhaps proper here to state that Mr. Bar ker's connection with the military, was at- 96 LIFE OF BARKER tributable to the Canadian troubles of 1837, with the history of Avhicli ray readers are doubtless generally farailiar. The burning of the Steamer Caroline, and other acts, and the prospect of trouble with Great Britain, had created a feeling of distrust as to the sufficiency of the military force ofthe city to protect the lives and property of the in habitants, and hence several new companies Avere organized as before related. In the spring of 1840, Mr. Barker Avas nominated by the democracy of Buffalo for Mayor. It was the first election by the peo ple of that officer, and perhaps increased in terest was felt in consequence. He entered upon the canvass under raany and great dis advantages ; — the anti-raasons and whigs had long maintained a majority in the city rang ing from three to six hundred, the commer cial, monied, and raarine interests of the city have in almost all cases been with them; and this majority had, since the revulsion in the credit system been confirmed, and per haps increased by the accession of raany of those whose ruin has been its consequence. The tide of speculation which flowed into LIFE OP BARKER. 97 the city with such rapidity and fullness, finally ebbed; and many, eager to lay the blame of their own folly any where but at their own door, grasped at the first specious cause which offered — that happened to be the democratic administration of the gov ernment; and upon this they laid the re sponsibility of their own acts, and made it the scape-goat for the sins of the people. Smarting under their losses, and actuated by the hope of bettering their condition by a change, this class regarded the adminis tration as a public enemy, and its support ers as their personal foes; their political became their personal feelings ; and the or dinary virulence and bitterness of political contests were much enhanced. Added to this, the opposition put in nomination their strongest man; one whose residence was coeval with the first settlement of the coun try — whose acquaintance and connections were extensive, and whose wealth and weight of character added strength to their already great numerical majority. It was against such adverse influences that Mr. Barker, at the call of his demo- 9* 98 LIFE OF BARKER. cratic friends entered upon the contest.— It was, without doubt, the most severe one ever known at our charter elections. The friends of each candidate exerted them selves to the utmost. Every influence which could be used was brought to bear. Few general elections have ever been so warmly contested. The eyes of the city and indeed of western New York were cen tered upon the issue. He Avas defeated by ten votes as follows : — Sheldon Thompson, Esq., 1 135 ; George P. Barker, 1 125. The array against Mr. Barker was too strong to be resisted. His private character Avas aspersed ; his professional integrity impugn ed, and his very honesty questioned by the opposition. The vote he received, all things considered, was a very gratifying one. He ran at an unfortunate crisis. That train of events which placed General William H. Harrison, in the Presidential chair was in motion. Few men would have run as well under the circumstances. As a matter of interest to Buflfalonians I here insert the vote cast for the several can didates for the Mayoralty of our city since 1840 : LIFE OP BARKER. 99 Year. Democratic. Whig. 1842. George W. Clinton, 1486. Isaac R. Harrington, 909 1843. Joseph G. Masten, 1657. Walter Joy, 1197 1844. Oliver G. Steele, 1389. Wm. Ketchum, 1602 1845. Joseph G. Masten, 1837. Hiram Barton, 1538 1846. Isaac Sherman, 1693. Solomon G. Haven, 2029 1847. Isaac Sherman, 2013. E. G. Spaulding, 2192 1848. Israel T. Hatch, 1855. Orlando Allen, 1970 The election in 1841 was not contested on party grounds, though the democrats generally supported Mr. Hathaway avIio was elected in opposition to I. A. Blossom, Esq. In 1849, the democracy were divided and ran two candidates : — Hiram Barton, - whig, 2341, Elijah Ford, - dem., 1466, Thompson Blersee, dem., 481. In the fall of 1840, occurred the exciting contest between Mr. Van Buren and Gen. Harrison for the Presidency. Mr. Barker, it is needless to say, gave to Mr. Van Buren his hearty support. He addressed meetings of the democracy with more than his usual force and beauty, and strove in every way not incompatible with honor to arrest the tide which was evidently setting in against his party. The Syracuse democratic state 100 LIFE OF BARKER. convention >which nominated Presidential electors, presented the names of Samuel Young, and George P. Barker as candidates for electors at large. Two nobler standard bearers could hardly have been found in the democratic galaxy. The election resulted in the prostration for a time ofthe democratic party, and the novel spectacle was presented of a whig state and national administration. The brief career of Gen. Harrison as Presi dent is well known. Scarce a month had elapsed, ere the citizens of our national capital who had witnessed the splendid pageant of the inaugural cavalcade, beheld with sincere regret all that was mortal of him conveyed to his long home. Grief, deep and universal was felt throughout the Union. Orations, feeling and beautiful were pronounced in our principal cities and towns. Funeral obsequies imposing and solemn testified in a touching manner the national bereavement. History seldom presents so striking an instance of the mu tability of earthly possessions. Called by a large m.ajority of his countrymen to fill LIFE OF BARKER. 101 the highest office known to our constitution, General Harrison was the center around which a great political party revolved. He was regarded with fond attachment by thou sands and high and raany were the expec tations his election created. His greatest ambition was satisfied, for he sat in that chair Avhich had been filled by a Washing ton, a Jefferson, a Jackson and a Van Buren. He was truly the " observed of all observers." Yet in one month after his assumption of the exalted duties of his sta tion, he was laid in " dull, cold marble " amid a nation's tears. The events Avhich succeeded are matters of history. John Tyler, brought down upon his administration the anathemas of the party that elected him and very essen tially aided by his general conduct, the re- establishment in the state and nation of democratic principles. Contrary to the general expectation, the November election in this state, in 1841, resulted in the complete and unexpected triumph of the democratic party. Calcu lating men on both sides may have antici* 102 LIFE OF BARKER. pated the election of a democratic majority of the merabers of the assembly, but the senate being a permanent body, and the whig majority in 1841 being quite large, few men before the election entertained the opinion that there would be a change of political power in that branch of the legis lature so early as the year 1842. Without enumerating the causes Avhich contributed to this result, it is sufficient for my purpose to notice briefly the events which led to the nomination and election of Mr. Barker as attorney general of the state. Mr. Hammond, in his '' Life and Times of Silas Wright," speaking of the assembly of 1842 says: — " There Avas an unusual number of men of talents elected to the assembly at the annual election in 1841. Frora the city of New York, O'SuUivan and Townsend, and Messrs. McClay, Grout, Jones, McMurray, etc., added much to the strength of the rep resentation from that city. Horatio Sey mour, frora Utica ; John A. Dix, late secre tary of state, now United States Senator from Albany ; Samuel Stetson, from Clinton LIFE OF BARKER. 103 county ; that learned and able lawyer, Geo. A. Simmons, from Essex; John W. Tamhn, from Jefferson; John A. Lott, from Kings; Levi S. Chatfield, from Otsego; George R. Davis, from Rensselaer ; the benevolent friend of popular education and of man, Calvin T. Hulburt, from St. Lawrence; the active and energetic Halsey Rogers and John Cramer, from Saratoga ; Ziba A. Le- land, from Steuben ; Charles Humphrey, for mer speaker, and now clerk of the Supreme Court, from Tompkins; and Michael Hoff man and Arphaxad Loomis, from the coun ty of Herkimer, were all men of distin guished ability." Isaac R. Elwood, of Rochester, was elec ted clerk of the senate, and Levi S. Chat field, of Otsego, speaker of the assembly. Mr. Elwood, is a gentleman of high culti vation, and possesses extensive and varied literary attainments. Mr. Chatfield is a man of superior talents and has exhibited ability in all the stations of responsibility he has filled. On the evening of the 4th of February, 1842, the democratic members of the legis- 104 LIFE OP BARKER. lature met in caucus to make nominations of state officers. Mr. Flagg was nomina ted almost by acclamation as comptroller, receiving 105 votes of the 107 members of the caucus; but the nomination of the other state officers was attended Avith more oppo sition and excited feeling. The principal competitors against Mr. Barker for the of fice of attorney general, were Sam'l Beards ley and Robert H. Morris. Mr. Beards ley had been the occupant of the office when the democratic party last retired from poAver, and his friends urged his nomination as an act of justice to him in as much as Mr. Flagg was nominated, Avho had also been one of the old officers. Besides, he had the influence of many leading politi cians at Albany, and in other parts of the state. His friends were confident of suc cess and did not treat Mr. Barker as a for midable candidate. Mr. Morris had pow erful friends in the caucus Avho strenu ously urged his nomination, on the ground of the abuse and obloquy which had been heaped upon him by Gov. Seward and the whig party for his participation in laying LIFE OF BARKER. 105 before the public the Glentworth papers, Avhicli had produced at that time great in terest throughout the state. During the excitement Mr. Morris found a deep feeling of sympathy in his favor in the democratic party, Avhich resulted greatly to his benefit in the legislative caucus. He was support ed by many men of great weight and influ ence in the party in various portions of the state. F. G. Jewett, Amasa J. Parker, H. L. Hogeboom and John B. Skinner were candidates who were supported by many prominent merabers of the party. George Rathbun Avas also a candidate until the night of the caucus when he authorized his friends to withdraw his narae. It will be perceived that almost each de mocratic portion of the state had a candi date for the office which rendered Mr. Bar ker's nomination quite doubtful in the minds of his friends, and his opponents considered it out of the question, but were willing to own him to be their second choice. He Avas however supported by many from different localities of the state, for his eminent quali fications and boundless popularity. No 10 106 LIFE OF BARKER. very prominent or influential men of the party originally advocated his nomination for they were committed to the candidates from their localities. Sanford E. Church, of Orleans county, had been elected to the legislature, the only democratic member from the eig^hth district. Mr. Church Avas a warm personal and po litical friend of Mr. Barker, and at once en tered into the contest with great enthusiasm tempered Avith caution and cool judgment. He was the youngest member of the legis lature ; but the fact that he had been elect ed from a county which Avas politically op posed to hira, and in the eighth district, where it was supposed no deraocrat could ever be elected to the legislature, counter acted the effect of his youthful appearance. His strong coramon sense and consuraraate tact were soon raanifest to thc sagacious politicians then at Albany, and raaterially assisted Mr. Barker's election to the office. When in the caucus it Avas moved to pro ceed to ballot for attorney general, Mr. Church rose and offered a resolution that the representation from each senate district LIFE OF BARKER. 107 should cast the number of votes of the members of the legislature frora the district. This resolution Avas offered notAvith a view to its passage, but to impress upon the cau cus the claims of Western New York, and thereby Mr. Barker. Mr. Church addressed the caucus on his resolution with marked ability and earnestness. He depicted the struggles of the democracy in this portion of the state for a quarter of a century, with overwhelming majorities against them, and unable to have from year to year a single voice in a democratic legislative caucus, and deprived of all participation in the election of officers Avho receive their appointment from the legislature. He appealed to the magnanimity of the members of the caucus to do an act of justice to a meritorious class of fellow democrats. His appeal met a magnanimous respond. As soon as he had closed his remarks Mr. Rathbun went to his friends and requested them to vote for Mr. Barker, and raany who were before doubt ful at once avowed in favor of his support. It was at once apparent that the tact and pianagement of Mr. Church had set the 108 LIFE OP BARKER. current irresistibly in favor of the nomina tion of Mr. Barker, notAvithstanding the great and prominent names and influences that were arrayed against him. No rejoin der could be made at such a time, by the friends of the opposing candidates, which could overcome the popularity of Mr. Bar ker, and as will be seen below at each bal loting his strength was increasing until on the third ballot he received 68 votes being a majority. When his nomination Avas an nounced the audience in the galleries gave long and repeated cheers for raa ny minutes, which exhibited the deep feeling which Mr. Barker's name carried among the masses. The nomination also was cordially approved by the friends of the various candidates, and the best feeling was exhibited on the result in every quarter. Mr. Church for his agency in the nomina tion received from Mr. Barker the title of the Democratic JMember from the eighth dis trict, by which designation he was known during the remainder of the session. LIFE OF BARKER. 109 Ballotings for attorney general in caucus. 1st Ballot. 2d Ballot. 3d Ballot. George P. Barker, 26 37 68 Samuel Beardsley, 23 18 2 Robert H. Morris, 22 34 35 A. J. Parker, 10 8 1 H. L. Hogeboom, 6 5 F. G. Jewett, 8 4 John B. Skinner, 10 1 The election for state officers was held on the 7th of February. Azariah C. Flagg, was elected comptroller; Samuel Young, secretary of state ; George P. Barker, at torney general ; (Mr. Barker's vote in the senate was 17 and in the assembly 79 against Willis Hall, who received ten in the senate and twenty-six in the assembly.) Thomas Farrington, at the same time was elected state treasurer ; Nathaniel Jones, surveyor general, and Henry Storms, ad jutant general. Mr. Barker's appointment was received with enthusiasm by his numerous friends throughout the state, and especially welcome was it to western New York . It was regarded as a just tribute to his genius and as an 10* 110 LIFE OF BARKER. acknowledgment of his great exertions in behalf of democracy. The folloAving correspondence does honor to all concerned, and evinces clearly the high estimation in which Mr. Barker was held by the bar of Erie county : — Buffalo, Feb. 10th, 1842. Dear Sir: — The members of the bar of this county, in common, as they believe, with all classes of their fellow citizens, have heard Avith emotions of pride and pleasure, that one of their number towards AA'hom they have entertained high feelings of pro fessional esteem and private regard, has been selected to fill the responsible and honorable office of attorney general of the state. They ought not to disguise from you, however, (if indeed disguise were possible in such a case,) that there is mingled with gratification at this appointment something of regret. Regret, that the relations which have so long, and so happily subsisted be tween them and yourself, must now be, in a degree, though slight we trust, less inti mate ; that the friendship which has known LIFE OP BARKER. Ill no political differences and in Avhich official position can effect no change, should be separated by distance even; that the en dearments of social intercourse, and the pride of professional association, cannot both continue to unite them to you. Re gret, public duties should require you to leave, for a time,Avhat they had hoped would always, remain their and your home. We have been appointed a committee to communicate in behalf of the members of the bar, these sentiments, and to express, without distinction of party, their ardent desires for your success and happiness. As heretofore, they felt a common inter est in your just reputation, they will rejoice as it shall be more eminent, in more extend ed usefulness, and in a wider sphere. They wish you, with one accord, personal pros perity and professional fame. Should your arrangements permit, the members of the bar wish to meet you at the festive board before you leave the city, and they request that you will partake, with them, a dinner on such day as your own convenience may suggest. 112 LIFE OF BARKER. We are your friends, H. J. STOW, HORATIO SEYMOUR, Jr. S. G. HAVEN, E. S. WARREN, GEO. R. BABCOCK, Committee. To George P. Barker, Attorney General. Buffalo, February 14th, 1842. To H. J. Stow, Horatio Seymour, Jr., S. G. Haven, E. S. Warren and Geo. R. Bab cock, Esquires : Gentlemen : — I had the pleasure on the 11th instant, to receive the favor of the members of the bar of Erie county, through you as their honored organ, congratulating me upon my "recent appointment to fill the responsible and honorable office of attorney general of this state" and re questing me to meet them at the festive board on such day previous to my depar ture as my own convenience might suggest. I need not assure you gentlemen, how deeply and how gratefully I am impressed by this compliment, so generously designed LIFE OP BARKER. 113 on the part ofmy brethren ofthe profession, and go flatteringly communicated by you, their committee. I regret that the period to my departure from this city is so short, interrupted as it must be by duties incident thereto, that I am compelled to decline an invitation, the acceptance of which Avould give me so much pleasure. The manner in which you have seen fit to allude to our professional and social in tercourse, has aAvakened sentiments in me which I ara Avithout language to express and must content myself by simply assuring you, and those you represent, that I appre ciate all your and their past and present kindness, and reciprocate all the friendship so happily expressed ; and I am fully confi dent that if I in any degree, possess those social virtues Avhich you have so flatteringly conceded, it is because I have breathed the atmosphere which you created — and if I have made one step in professional ad vancement, it is because your example has inspired me, and your partiality cheer ed me. 114 LIFE OF BARKER. The strong and I doubt not sincere ex pressions of kind regard toward me person ally, contained in your communication, gives me ample proof that your social feel ings are of a character too elevated and too pure to be influenced by any diversity of political sentiments or professional contro versy, and fully evince that the members of the bar of Erie county are indeed legiti mate members of a liberal profession. I beg therefore, my brethren of the pro fession to be assured that I shall carry with me the highest respect for their talents and friendship, Avhich will not be changed by any future vicissitude of fortune ; that my eyes will always be turned to the members of the bar of Erie county, as my earliest and best tried friends. With best wishes for your collective and individual happiness, I have the honor to be Your friend, GEO. P. BARKER. LIFE OP BARKER. 115 CHAPTER VI. Mr. Barker in common with most of the democracy of this state regarded the selec tion of Mr. Van Buren as the candi date at the presidential election in 1844 as an act of justice due not only to Mr. Van Buren personally, but also to the principles of the party he had represented and which had been temporarily overthrown by the great \fhig triumph four years be fore. Brought by his official position and other circumstances into intimate connection with men feeling the deepest personal inte rest in Mr. Van Buren's re-election to the presidency, it was natural that one of his ardent temperament should become strongly excited by events then transpir ing, which were diminishing, if not certainly destroying every chance of Mr. Van Buren's obtaining the nomination of the Baltimore convention. Chief among those events was 116 LIFE OF BARKER. the question of the annexation of Texas, and the position in which Mr. Van Buren had placed him-self thereto. No doubt the position was taken under a clear conviction of duty. His sagacious mind foreshadowed the dangers of war Avith a neighboring Repub lic, if the annexation of Texas Avas urged upon grounds of sectional interest, Avithout proper regard to the feelings of Mexico, and in A'iolation of the ordinary rules of diplomacy. Subsequent events have shown his apprehensions were well founded; but Avhether Texas could have been peaceably annexed under his line of policy is a matter of conjecture, which each citizen of our government must decide. Those, and there were many such, pro minent in the democratic ranks, who coin cided fully in the sentiments expressed in Mr. Van Buren's letter, considered the pressing of the question into the presiden tial canvass, as not required by the state of popular feeling, but as aggressive on the part of the slave holding states, with an exclusive design of strengthening sectional interests at the expense of Mr. Van Buren LIFE OP BARKER. 117 and at the hazard of the success of the de mocratic party. It is not strange therefore, that an act, which although demanded by national considerations of great magnitude and Avhich subsequent events proved to have been indispensable elements of the great victory achieved by the democracy, should have been viewed by those whose cherished hopes, it must disappoint, as an ungenerous contrivance to prevent Mr. Van Buren's nomination ; and especially as it was impossible for them to doubt that his election would certainly folloAv a nomina tion, or to credit the sincerity of those Avho looking more calmly at the popular senti ment on the subject of the annexation, and therefore measuring it raore accurately, declared that it was impossible for the de mocratic party to succeed with a candidate not unqualifiedly in favor of the measure. The irritation incident to so great a dis appointment could not be expected to sub side at once into an unqualified acquies cence in the action of the convention, however wise the course of events might show that action to have been, but very 11 118 LIFE OF BARKER. naturally showed itself in some acts of in discretion amount • a>";few most warmly excited against what they deemed soutjiern domination. The most exceptionable, of these acts, more perhaps frf)m the form of doing it than othe]*"wise, was the getting up and confidentially distributing a letter known generally as " the secret circular," to Avhich Mr. Barker's name was attached. It is uncertain what degree of responsi bility should be ascribed to him for this document. Probably much less than might be inferred from his high and influential party position. Indeed there is reason for supposing that he had little direct agency in its production, and that his signature to^ it was conceded rather to the wishes of pes^: sonal friends than to the conviction of his own judgment. But however this may be, he was not a man to shrink from a respon-' sibility which friends had brought him un der, and therefore we must leave him as he chose to be left, subject to the imputation of whatever indiscretion the act may be thought to involve. In the view I have taken of this subject I LIFE OF BARKER. 119 am fully co'nfirmeid by Mr. Bark^'s own testimony. He "defined his position " in a speech made in Buffalo, on the evening of the 7th of Septcrtibcr, 1844. The meet ing was held for the purpose of responding to the nomination of Messrs. Wright and Gardiner, and Avas numerously attended by the democracy of the city. The daily Courier, the democratic organ of the city at that time, speaking of the speech says : — " The speech of Gen. Barker on that oc casion deserves more than the passing notice we have given it, more than the con- depsed report of the proceedings could embody. The circumstances under Avhich it was made gave it a peculiar interest, and -it is presumed that the same circumstances must to some extent influence his numerous friends throughout the country. His views have been so systematicafly misrepresented by the federal press, that it was due to them to be presented by himself to those with who'm he had so long battled in behalf of the democratic cause, who had supported hira through every period of his political career, who had cheered, encouraged and 120 LIFE OP BARKER. countenanced his efforts on the side of hu man rights from his first aAvakening to the duty of a disciple of Jefferson, and a servant of humanity, to the last struggle in which with them he opposed the enemies of popu lar freedom, that they might see wherein he had strayed from the republican fold, if he had done so — that they might shield him against detraction if he still held his old place in their full confidence and esteem. " It is needless to say that this speech, though rather the friendly converse of an old acquaintance, than any labored effort to be brilliant and oratorical, was eloquent and spirit stirring. There were passages in it that awoke the fiery enthusiasm of the old Democracy of Buffalo to a pitch that never but in the present canvass and under the circumstances could be paralleled and there were also passages that almost brought unbidden tears to the cheeks of veterans in the democratic ranks that surrounded him. It was full of feeling and truth, and went to the hearts of those avIio heard it." He commenced by alluding to the old re lations he held to those he addressed, and LIFE OF BARKER. 121 the pleasure it gave him to meet with and congratulate them on such an occasion. He congratulated them and the democracy of the state and the Union on the expres sion that had been given of their wishes by the state convention which nominated Silas Wright for governor of New York. And who was Silas Wright? He was one, in the language of the poet, " On whom each god did seem to set his seal. To give the world assurance of a Man. " He was one whose far seeing sagacity, whose deep sympathy with whatever was beautiful and true, and whose disinterested and devoted love of country had wrested from admiration, for a garland to his name, the proud title of " Cato of America." He was the personification of American Democracy, of that profound regard for the rights of the many, as men, which, glowing in the bosom of the Sage of Monticello, sparkled forth from his pen and was en shrined in the foundation of our freedom. He was one who had just turned his back upon the highest office this side of heaven, who had turned his back also, upon the 11* 122 LIFE OP BARKER. highest judicial station in the country, but who freely gave himself to the democracy of the state, feeling the holiness of their claim upon him. And the democracy of the state in the spirit of the patriarch who offered his son for a sacrifice, had nominated him to shoAV to the Union the devotion they felt to the common cause in this great crisis of republicanism, and to assure thera^ that although they sustained a deep disappoint ment in the defeat of Mr. Van Buren at the National Convention, they gave to the worthy nominee upon whom the preference had fallen, their whole and cordial support. They gave to the democracy of their sister states for an example and encouragement, the choicest jewel in their possession as an hostage for her fidelity to the republican cause, thus assuring the triumph of the national democratic candidates. No mili tary laurels lustered the head of this favorite son of Ncav York, no startling incident in the history of his country was identified with his fame, but by the native dignity of his character, by the faultless purity of his public life, by his ceaseless devotioq LIFE OF BARKER. 123 to the common welfare, by the unvarying fidelity of his attachment to democratic principles, he stood araong the very first and noblest of his nation and his age, the pride of his state and one of the pillars of his country's glory. Such was the candidate for the chief office, and such the spirit in which the nomination had been raade. He said it was with emotions of peculiar gratification that he referred to the selection of Addison Gardiner for Lieut. Governor. If any thing could add to the satisfaction the nomination of Mr. Wright had given, it was abundantly increased by the choice of Mr. G., a man of the purest character, of sterling qualities, and a democrat of that district, the old 8th, where they were born so, and hated federalism because they couldn't help it. The sentiment was innate. In Mr. G„ the democracy of Western New York hailed a brother and a friend. One who in that station or any other in which he raight be placed, would deserve and re ciprocate their fullest confidence. This nomination added to the assurance New York had given to the rest of the Union 124 LIFE OF BARKER. that her soul was in the great contest, that her vote should be bestowed on the Baltimore Democratic Nominees. These selections settled her vote and settled the triumph of the country in the eleva tion of Polk and Dallas to the high offi ces for which they had been nominated. Again he congratulated the democracy present and every where, upon the aus picious promise secured to the state and the Union by the nominations of Wright and Gardiner. He had intended to address thera upon the great questions which the issue of this contest involved. He was suf fering under physical debility, the conse quence of previous exertion, and felt unable to do them that justice which their impor tance demanded. He would embrace a future opportunity to do so, and before the election would terminate, would tread his old battle ground of Erie county over again as a soldier of the war. But there was one question on which it became him to make a few remarks to them, his old personal and political friends. He would open his whole heart to them and talk with an unreserved LIFE OP BARKER. 125 confidence, as though he were conversing with each by his own family fireside. The question he alluded to, it would be readily surmised was the annexation of Texas. The whig press had systematically and grossly misrepresented his views upon that subject and one or two democratic journals had seemingly given some credit to their erroneous intimations. He felt the flame of democracy burn as brightly and purely in his bosom as it had ever done, and his explanation of his sentiments would show that if he had erred, it was from too much and not too little of the democratic infu sion — because he was in advance and not behind his party. If he ever fell, he would assure them that it Avould be at the head and not in the rear of their column. He was at peace with himself, and if he was not also at peace with his friends the fault was in his too much zeal, but he hoped better of it. The annexation of Texas he regarded as a great national, a great American question. It could not, from its very nature, be a party question, because it involved none of those principles which were in issue between the 126 LIFE OP BARKER. parties. If the question was merely of the extension of democratic principles it would have a different form. He regarded slavery quite in other, than the light of a blessing. That institution, as it existed, he Avould suf fer to remain as it is under the guard of the constitution, until it be removed by the ac tion of the states in which it exists. He should dislike the extension of slavery over the whole of a new and vast country. He A\dshed also that the public debt of Texas should be ascertained before the union Avith this country should be effected. He could not corarait hiraself with a blind and reck less disregard of what was just and right, to any terms of annexation that raight possi bly be offered. He thought the resolution of the Baltimore convention might have ex pressed raore clearly the intention of its framers to sanction nothing but what was proper and just. It was liable to raisrepre- sentation, and had been so raisrepresentcd by our opponents. He should have liked it better, had it been more definite as to terms, expressing justice and honor instead of leav ing thera to be understood as conditions of tho act of union. LIFE OP BARKER. 127 The relations between Mexico and Texas he did not regard as insuperable obstacles. The title of the former was to be deter mined by her abihty to enforce it, and if upon a precept to show cause she did not in a reasonable time plead recovery and possession, she A\as justly barred from the right to reclaim. There Avas a law of limi tations in the code of coraraon sense as Avell as in the statute books of the civil tribu nals. The circumstances of the case were such that he should almost be willing to give her the length of an usual notice to quit and let that be the end of it. He believed and felt assured that the in stitutions of this country might be safely extended over the entire continent, and he did not doubt, but they would be. The flight of the American Eagle raight be from pole to pole, and from sea to sea, and the stars and stripes be the banner of the whole broad dominion. They would be at some future period, and he thanked God they were abundantly able to protect it. Oregon was ours, ours by discovery, by purchase and by conquest, and he was for taking pos- 128 LIFE OF BARKER. session of it and making short work with the pretensions of England. He would al most rather fight England without cause than any other nation with, but there would be cause enough if she persisted in her claim to Oregon. It was ours and we would have it, because it was ours, even if we had no present use for it. The soil that is con secrated by the rights of liberty must never be yielded to despots. It Avas bought by the blood of our fathers, and the blood of those father's children should preserve it if needs be. Texas must belong to the Union and be a part of it. Nature made it so, and man must confirm it. Its annexation was inev itable and neither could, nor ought to be prevented. The only question that could arise was upon the conditions of her com ing. It was desirable to have those condi tions suitable and proper, based upon equit able terms, and adjusted in a wise and libe ral spirit. The adjustment of those condi tions he was content to leave with the de mocratic party, for he was satisfied that they would be just and reasonable, and such as LIFE OP BARKER. 129 would satisfy the country and do no preju dice to the national honor. It Avould be seen that he could not withhold his support from the democratic candidates, even if he differed with the federalists on no other sub ject than this. Their whole past course had been such as to show that they could not be trusted Avith the rights or the honor of the country. In the last war they were on the side of England, their whole policy was a British one, and even so late as within the last three or four years they had bowed the Eagle's head in the dust in obedience to that power, and even bartered away for a song the sacred soil of the republic. How then could the settlement of this great ques tion be trusted with that party? It could not, and it was the duty of every one who wished it to be settled in a proper and equitable manner, to place the power in the hands of those whose past conduct was a guarantee that it would be wisely and right eously used. It was seen that he Avas not opposed to the annexation of Texas, that he was on the contrary decidedly in favor of it, and 12 130 LIFE OP BARKER. that in fact the only difference between him and the democratic party at large, was that he had expressed his opinion as to some of the conditions that should govern it, instead of being silent and leaving them to be broached when thc time for the execution of the project came up. He had offended only in this, if he offended at all, which he could not believe. He left to his friends to say whether they approved of or condemned his views, but he could not consent to be judged by his enemies, and hoped only they would continue to abuse him, for praise from a federal tongue was the bitterest malignity of detraction. Much had been said about a certain cir cular, a sort of bugbear with which the whigs had sought to frighten democrats from their propriety of demeanor, and this use of it had probably made it to be regard ed as infinitely more terrible than it really was. It was never intended as thc basis of a secret measure but only as the origin of a public one, if the leading democrats of the state thought there existed sufficient cause for it. It was prepared and sent at a time LIFE OP BARKER. 131 when it was apprehended that there might be many honest people in the state who from a misapprehension of the views ofthe national convention in regard to Texas, might feel disposed to abandon the demo cratic platform and vote for Mr. Clay. The object of the circular was to ascertain if there Avere many such, and if there were, consequently a necessity of some public step to induce them to support the democratic nominees, Polk and DaHas, by shoAving them that that course Avas the only consistent or prudent one, as it certainly Avould have been. The Avhole compass of its meaning was to serve and not to injure, to unite and not to divide the democratic party. It was sent as confidential to avoid false alarm, the object being simply to inquire. If the result should show that there were doubts to remove and difficulties to heal, then a public step Avas to be taken to perform that office. But if, as proved to be the case, there was no danger to apprehend, then of course there Avas no thing to be done, and the inquiry would rest in the oblivi^ to Avhich it belonged. That was the whole length and breadth ofthe cele- 132 LIFE OP BARKER. brated secret circular. There was no gall in its chemistry until it was infused by its foes. It originated in the best intentions : from an over anxious, perhaps, but not un kindly meant solicitude for the harmony and efficiency of the democratic force. The event showed that it was not needed, per haps that it was unwise, but it was born in good thoughts and ought not to be kept alive by bad motives. Let it sleep, in its folly if people will, but also in its innocence. It was said by the federal press that he ought to support Mr. Clay. He support Mr. Clay! The thought was a libel, the suggestion a falsehood. Mr. Clay was not opposed to the annexation of Texas, he had said he would be glad to see it, and if be (Mr. B.) Avas as hostile to it as he was the reverse, he could not with any propriety support him, even throwing out of the ques tion all the great and important issues — issues upon which he believed the destiny not only of a small territory, a few thousand inhabitants, but of this great country with its myriad people, depend for weal or woe — ^which were to be determined by this LIFE OP BARKER. 133 election. There was but one democratic course, there was but one patriotic course, and there Avas but one prudent course, and there was but one honest course, and that course had been his from the first. He had not wavered the length of a line, or a hair's breadth from it; and he should carry it out, as every friend of his country, of humanity, of all, in one Avord, and that word democracy, he hoped Avould do, and that vvas, by supporting the democratic nominees of nation and state, with his best ability and zeal, and putting up prayers in addition, if he thought them necessary, for the success of Polk, Dallas, Wright and Gardiner. The election resulted in the triumph ofthe democracy in the state and nation. The Empire State had been the battle ground of the Union. Here the orators of each party had made formidable demonstrations in favor of their respective candidates. But Silas Wright's name was a " tower of strength ; " under it, the legions of demo cracy were invincible. The principles of the democratic party were once more plac-^ 12* 134 LIFE OF BARKER. ed in the ascendant. I do not purpose to allude to the administration of Mr. Polk ; — to its many important events ; — nor to the divisions in the democratic party in this state, which became more manifest after his elevation to thc presidency, in other than general terms. Without dilating upon the events which produced these divisions, it is proper however, that I should state that Mr. Barker from the first, sided warmly with the radical, or barn burning portion of the party. On every occasion which was pre sented he took decided and high grounds in favor of the principles of the Wilmot Proviso, and the distinctive principles ofhis section of thc party. His labors in favor of radical democracy justly entitle him to the honor of being classed with the la mented Wright and HoFPMAr;r. Like them, alas ! he Avas struck down by death in the meridian of life, and in the prime of his intellect. LIFE OF BARKER. 135 CHAPTER VII. Before alluding to Mr. Barker's career as attorney general, I shall briefly notice the difficulties which became more palpable in the democratic party in this state, during the period he held the office. I cannot make myself better understood on this point than by quoting from Mr. Hammond's valuable political history. Speaking of the legislature of 1843, he says: " No material alterations Avere made in the New York legislature, as respects the committees of the two houses, except those caused by the election of new members, in lieu of those of last year. Mr. Hoffman not having been a candidate, and of course not having been re-elected, Mr. Allen, of Oswego, was appointed to supply his place as chairman of the committee of ways and means in the assembly. " The state officers — consisting of Sam- 136 LIFE OF BARKER. UEL Young, secretary of state; A. C. Flagg, comptroller; George P. Barker, attorney general; Thomas Farrington, treasurer; and Mr. Jones, the surveyor general — were all of them radical in their political views, and warmly in favor of the financial act of 1842. Besides, as we have before remarked, if not opposed to the nomination of Mr. Bouck they at least ac quiesced in it with coldness and some reluc tance. From their standing and talents they possessed great influence in the legis lature, and over the minds ofthe masses of the democratic party." *4t .&£. ^ M, M, •TV" "TT TV ^r W "With men of such talents, weight of character, and political influence, compri sing in theory a part of the state adminis tration, who looked upon him with cold ness, the situation of Mr. Bouck may well be considered as having been anything but that of ease and quiet. "The state officers, as we are assured by a gentleman intimate with them all, doubted whether the governor really and cordially approved of Mr. Hoffman's act of 1842 ; LIFE OF BARKER. 137 and his message on that subject Avas not satisfactory to them, nor, as our correspon dent says, to those 'who, in 1840, '41 and '42, had occupied the front of the battle against the continuation of expenditures for the extension of internal improvements, but,' he adds, 'they remained inactive.' "By some means it came to be under stood at the very commencement of Mr. Bouck's administration, that a portion of the democratic party were opposed to him. This portion Avas understood as acting under the advisement of the state officers. Whether such was the fact, we do not know ; but Ave do know it Avas so reported, and we have reason to believe that Gov. Bouck gave some credit to the rumor. No doubt some of the applicants for office encouraged this notion, and were careful to represent themselves as friends to thc gov ernor, par excellence. If this disaffection Avas at first ideal, it soon became real, and began to be recognized. The governor, however, attempted to conciliate ; and with that view generally made his appointments from candidates recommended by county 138 LIFE OF BARKER. conventions, or by members of the legisla ture from the respective counties where the applicants resided. By adopting this course, he appointed nearly or perhaps quite as many of those who Avere called his opponents, as of those who were knoAvn to be his friends. In this way the governor surrendered to irresponsible county conven tions and to the members ofthe legislature, that patronage Avith which the constitution had invested him. He nevertheless Avas held responsible by his friends for appoint ing those they cafled his enemies. "We have never known this temporizing policy pursued with success. We like much belter the course which our corres pondent says Mr. Flagg pursued in the canal board. Thc gOA'ernor should either in all his conversations and intercourse have repudiated the insinuations that the state officers and their friends were opposed to him, and waged AA-^ar against the men who persisted in asserting that such Avas the fact; or he should have declared war agaiiist the state officers, and Avielded his patronage accordingly. With such veteran LIFE OF BARK&R. 13d political partizans he should have seen no middle course could be taken. We hope our readers will bear in mind that we now speak oi party policy only. "But the controversy which grew out of the appointment of a state printer as the successor of Mr. Weed, whom it was deter^ mined to remove, (solely for party reasons,) produced the sharpest collisions, and prob ably had more effect in creating and perpet uating the difference between the two sections of the democratic party, and attracted more the attention of the legisla ture and of the public, than any other oc currence during the year 1843." After, at con.siderable length stating the history of the controversy and of the action of the legislature with reference to the public printing, Mr. Hammond goes on to say: "On the 21st of January, a caucus of the democratic members of the two houses Avas held for the nomination of state printer. But before giving the result of this meeting it may be proper to state that Mr. Van Dyck had withdrawn his name as a candi- 140 LIFE OP BARKER. date for the office, and there was not in Reality any candidate against Mr. Croswell. Those of the caucus who Avould not vot6 for Mr. Croswellj voted, Avithout any hope of success, and we presume without any serious effort on his part, for William C. Bryant, of the Evening Post. There were 108 members present, of whom 66 voted for Mr. Croswefl, 40 for Mr. Bryant, and there were two scattering votes cast. "The next day the election was made by the two houses, in pursuance of the nomi nation. On the same day Ebenezer Mack, of Ithaca, formerly a senator, and author of the biography of General Lafayette, was chosen printer to the senate, and Messrs. Carrol & Cook for the assembly." Mr. H. then alludes to the establishment of the Albany Atlas, in 1841, by Messrs. Vance & Wendell; to its transfer in 1843 to Messrs. French & Cassidy; to the course it pursued while Mr. Van Dyck Avas contending with Mr. Croswell for the state printing; to the fact that on the 7th of February, 1843, Silas Wright Avas re-elected senator of the United States for six years LIFE OP BARKER. 141 from the 4th day of March, 1843. At the caucus held on tho evening before the day on which Mr. Wright was chosen, upon balloting for a candidate, his name was found written on every ballot. He had in fact outlived not only opposition but com petition. "The feuds that prevailed at Albany, and among the democratic merabers of the legislature, did not to any extent affect the people in the country counties. They were, it is true, felt in the county of Oneida; but there thc hunkers seem at that time to have held a majority over both whigs and radi cals. However, Mr. Horatio Seymour, Avho was very popular, was a candidate for the assembly from the city of Utica, and undoubtedly added great strength to the ticket; besides, we believe both parties at that time in Oneida county held themselves bound by regular nominations. " That the divisions in Albany did not affect the election in the state, is proved by the general result. Nearly three to one of thc members returned to the assembly Avere democrats ; and in eight senatorial districts. 13 142 LIFE OF BARKER- the democratic pa.rty succeeded in all except the eighth. The senate after this election contained twenty-six democrats and only six whigs. Of a transaction which occurred in 1844, and which doubtless contributed considerably to widen the breach which then prevailed in the party in this state, Mr. Hammond thus speaks: " Formerly the librarian of the state library was appointed by the governor, lieutenant governor and state officers. In the year 1842, Mr. William Cassidy, a young man who had raany friends in Alba ny, as well on account of his own character as on that of his father, who, though httle known out of Albany, with all the ardent, native benevolence of an Irishman, literally fed the hungry and clothed the naked, was appointed librarian by the votes of the state officers — Messrs. Young, Flagg and Bar ker — against the votes of Governor Sew ard and lieutenant governor Bradish. He continued to hold the office till June, 1844. But in the winter of that year an act was passed constituting the regents of the LIFE OP BARKER. 143 university trustees of the state library, and transferring to them the power of appoint ing the librarian. It has been suggested by the friends of Mr. Cassidy, that one cause of passing this act was to procure his removal from the office. However this may be, on the first day of June, at a meet ing of the regents, Mr. Cassidy was re- maved. We ought to have mentioned, that he had for some time before been one of the editors of the Albany Atlas ; and it was urged, on a motion for his removal, that his time and attention were so much engaged in the management of that paper, that he did not, and could not, devote the necessary time to the proper performance of his du ties as a librarian, but no specific charge of official negligence vras made against him. The board of regents proper were equally divided on the question of removal. The ex-ojjicio regents then present were, the secretary of state, Col. Young, and Gov. Bouck and lieutenant governor Dickinson. Mr. Young voted against the removal, and Mr. Dickinson for it. This cast the re sponsibility on governor Bouck of giving a 144 LIFE OF BARKER. casting vote, and he gave that vote for the removal of Cassidy. The course of thc governor on this question increased the hostility and irritation against him." It would be inconsistent Avith my limits for me to go at length into a narration of the dissensions in the democratic party in this state. Yet, it seemed necessary to give something, by which an accurate opinion could be formed of Mr. Barker's connection Avith them. In a previous chap ter I have given at some length, his opin ions with reference to the "secret circular" and have also noticed some of the causes of its promulgation. I believe Mr. Barker was conscientiously opposed to the exten sion of slavery over territories noAv free. He regarded its influence upon the great elements of national prosperity as deleteri ous. He believed it Avas opposed to the genius ofour institutions, and looked upon it as calculated to thwart all thc efforts of the fathers of the Republic to establish and perpetuate the blessings of free institu tions. He Avas a sincere believer in the doctrine of free soil for free men. He LIFE OP BARKER. 145 thought Avith some of our wisest and best men, that free and slave labor could not flourish on the same soil. In 1847, he believed "the time had come" when oppo sition to .slavery extension should bo incor porated into the democratic platform. He felt, thereiore, constrained to act zeal ously with the radxal democracy in carry ing out their principles. His conduct Avas, as might have been expected, rigidly scru tinized. He was bitterly dencunced by some, and charged with deserting the parly. To those acquainted Avith his history, this charge Avas regarded as frivolous, if not ridiculous. They recollected, that, Avhen years ago, anti-masonry swept over the Avestern portion of the state, he was fear- les.^ly battling for democratic mc:isures and men; that from his youth he had adhered t-o the party in the darkest hours; they remembered how he threw himself into the breach in 1840, against the excitement of "Tippecanoe and 'l"}ler too" — they could not forget his enthusiastic support of the ticket in 184-1, notwithstanding Mr. Van Buren's treatment at the Baltimore con- 13* 146 LIFE OF BARKER, vention ; they could not forget how gener ously he had devoted his time and talents in aid of the democracy through a series of years. His course, therefore, caused most of his political friends to cling still closer to him. He identified himself with the section of the party which sustained, as he believed, the principles of true democracy. In behalf of those principles he battled with all the energy and eloquence with which he was endowed. Among the pioneers in thc noble stand made by the friends of free soil against the slavery extension principle, his name must ever stand prominent. With that fearlessness and frankness so natural to him, he embarked in the struggle be tween antagonistic interests, and upon the issue staked his political prospects. I have often heard him speak in prophetic lan guage with reference to the free soil move ment; he predicted the day was not far distant when it would meet the cordial ap proval of the entire democratic party. Though firm and decided in his course, he was still courteous and kind to those who entertained different opinions. LIFE OF BARKER. 147 I cannot better conclude this connection, than by noticing the Syracuse convention of 1844, which nominated Silas Wright for governor, and thereby secured the ascen dancy of the democratic party in the state and nation. Mr. Hammond alluding to it says: "Tho convention was held on the 14th of Sep tember, and the various counties in the state were fully represented in it. " Mr. Heman j. Redfield, of Genesee, a hunker, Avas, it is said, at the request of Mr. Wright, unanimously elected President, and Judge Denio, of Oneida, and general Sawyer, of Schoharie, with six others, were chosen vice presidents. Governor Bouck had instructed a judicious friend, who was a delegate, to withdraw his name from com petition if he should think proper; and as it Avas soon ascertained that a large major ity of the delegates were for nominating Mr. Wright, thc personal friends of that gentleman urged that the name of governor Bouck should be withdrawn, they having, as was supposed, reason to believe that Mr. Wright would be dissatisfied if his name 148 LIFE OP BARKER. should be used in oppc^ition to 'anyrepub- licuti.' But the delegate to Avhom governor Bouck had given this discretionary author ity, upon consulting with thc other friends of Mr. B., was advised against AvitiidraAving his name. Tho convention therefore pro ceeded to a ballot, v.'hich icsulted in 95 voles for Wright and 30 for Bouck; Avhere- upon Mr. Seymour, one ofthe most distin guished and zealous friends of the re-nomi nation of governor Bouck, moved that the nomination of Mr. Wright should be de clared unanimous, and the resolution Avas adopted AvithoUt a dissenting voice. Addi- sox Gardiner, late circuit judge of thc eighth circuit, Avas unanimously nominated for lieutennnt governor." * * * '-By the resolutions adopted by the convention they denounced a high tariff, a national bank, the distribution ofthe proceeds ofthe public lands, &;c., and they approved the resolutions adopted by the Baltimore con vention. They do not allude to the annex- tion of Texas, other than by expressing their approbation of the principles put forth by the Baltimore convention. They prob- Life op barker. 140 ably designedly avoided any express allu sion to that '¦great American measure,^ be cause, araong other reasons, their candidate for governor had voted against thc Texas treaty in the senate, and sinco his return from Washington, and since the Baltimore convention, had declared in a speech deliv ered at Watertown to a mass meeting, that he Avas opposed to annexation." In order to explain Mr. Barker's position on what I regard as important subjects, I have somewhat deviated from my regular narrative. I shall now briefly al'ude to his professional career as attorney general. Shortly after his election in February, 1842, he took up his residence in Albany, and entered upon the discharge of the respon sible and delicate duties of his office. His immediate predecessors, Samuel Beards ley and Willis Hall, Avere raen of great legal ability and were pecu'.iarly well qua lified for their station. They dis charged their duties in a very satisfactory manner. All that seems strictly necessary for me to notice in this connection, is the manner 150 LIFE OP BARKER. in which Mr. Barker discharged the ardu ous duties pertaining to his station. I infer the peculiar character of the duties of the attorney general are well understood. It is conceded that he exhibited in a pre-emi nent degree those qualities for which he was noted. His intellect, as I have before remarked, shone best before a jury. In many important trials, he acquitted himself with distinguished credit, and some of his forensic efforts during his attorney general ship are acknowledged to have been among the noblest emanations from the American bar. He was necessarily brought into com petition with men of the highest legal at tainments, but on all occasions he sustained himself with honor. His intellect seemed to brighten by the contests and each en counter added to his fame. In the city of NeAv York, particularly — a city noted for great professional ability, and numbering in its bar gentlemen celebrated for their soul- stirring eloquence, his commanding talents elicited from the press of both the great political parties, the warmest encomiums. Indeed, the press throughout the state LIFE OF BARKER. 151 without distinction of party bore testimony to his( success. His pohshed and kind manner rendered him popular among all with whom his official duties brought him in contact, and it is universally admitted that he honorably sustained himself through out his entire term. In February, 1845, the period for the election of state officers having arrived, Mr. Barker was offered a re-appointment, but he declined, and John Van Buren, Esq., a gentleman of distinguished attainments, was elected his successor. During the three years Mr. Barker re sided in the capital, he gained the esteem of all classes, and his memory is warmly cherished by the Albanians. After his re tirement from the office of attorney general, he returned to Buffalo, and resumed the practice of the law. Since Avriting Mr. Barker's legislative history, my attention has been called to a letter (which I subjoin,) written by the highly esteemed President of Union College. It was addressed to Mr. Barker, and con tains the most salutary ad^ ice expressed in 152 life OP barker. the most felicitous style. Additional in terest will be attached to it, when I state tliat Dr. Nott has always entertained the warmest feehngs of friendship towards him, and when he left Union college confidently predicted his future eminence. Umo.n Cui.legr, Jan. 20, 1836. Deak Sir: — Since I did not find you in the other day when j called, the interest I feel in your success as a public man, will be my apology for troubling you with a few observations, the observance of which may be of some use. Do not speak often, and only on important occasions. When you do speak be brief, pertinent and stop when you have finished. Speak rather in the furtherance of your own objects than in de feating those of others. Endeavor to allay the prejudices which naturally exist between the city and the country. Be cojrteous e \ all occasions, especially in debate and to your immediate an tagonists. Never indulge in personalities. Never lose your temper, nor make an enemy if you can avoid it. Conquests may be made by conciliation and persuasion as certainly as by ridicule and .Jarcasm, but in the one case the chains are silken and sit easy — in the other, iron and gall the wearer. Though you point your arrows never poison them; and if the club of Hercules must be raised, let it be the naked club, not entwined with serpents. These are hints merely, but a word to the wise is sufficient. And with legislators or others, a man needs to live one life to know how to live another, and since this cannot be done liter ally, we can only do it in cflect, by availing ourselves of the ex perience of others. Wishing you every success, I am, in haste, very sincerely yours. ELIPHALET NOTT. CIFB OF BARKER. 153 CHAPTER VIII. Mr. Barker was again appointed district attorney of Erie county in October, 1845, but his health was so impaired as to occa sion interruptions in the discharge of the duties of the office. He was for the last time brought before the people for an elective office in the spring of 1846. He was nominated by the democ racy of the county as one of the candidates for election to the convention which was called to revise the constitution of this state in June of that year. The election was held in April, and although it was not per haps contested on strict party grounds, the electors nevertheless generally voted in ac cordance with their political preferences. Mr. Barker ran ahead of his ticket as will be seen by the following : H. J. Stow, whig, 3308 5 A. Bull, do., 3265 ; Aaron Sahsbury, do.,3299 5 AmosWright,do.,3210; George 14 154 LIFE OF BARKER. P. Barker, democrat, 2891; H. H. Barney, do., 2841; SilasTaber, do., 3572; Jonathan H. Ford, do., 2509. His vote, though a mi nority one, was still creditable when all the attendant circumstances arc considered. A friend ofthe deceased, a gentleman fa vorably known as a writer, furnishes the sub joined, which illustrates forcibly one of his charactevistics : — "It is easy to perceive that thc public character of a man so conspicuous as was Mr. Barker raust have been well knoAvn and appreciated. So fnink and unguarded Avas his deportraent that the characteristics of his private life were almost as generally known as his public career. As he was en tirely destitute of all pretence, he Avas never guilty of inconsistency. Many of his acts might be enumerated, which he little thought Avould ever become subjects of printed no tice, and which however trivial they may be deemed by superficial thinkers, prove the essential benevolence and generosity of his character. It is said of a certain laAvyer that having taken a very sma'l fee, he was ac cused by his brethren of having disgraced LIFE OP BARKER. 155 theii- profession. He replied that he had taken little because he could not get more, and that, little as it might seem, it was the whole Avoildly estate of his client. " 'i'liis" he submitted "could not be called disgrac ing thc profession." In such things, Mr. Barker might be termed a disgrace to his profession, but an honor to mankind. He Avas singularly disinterested in many of his most strenuous exertions ; and if the walls of thc prison could tell the annals of their various inmates, he would be knoAvn as one Avho, \vithout fee or reward or the hope of any, would often devote his professional and oratorical ability to the utmost in aiding the wretched. Nor Avas he deficient in firmness when acting in behalf of thc public. The Avriter Avili always remeiubcr tho words of a colored man, whom Mr. Barker assisted, but who underwent the extreme pcniilty of the law. " Mr. Barker " said he, " gives rae his heart — he gives me himself. I have nothing to pay him Avith, but if I were thc riche.-.t man in thc country, he could not be more attentive to mc, or e.vert hiii.self more in my behalf." Such deeds 156 LIFE OP BARKER. as these form his epitaph, and when the recording angel shall contradict the words on many an ostentatious tomb-stone, these so slightly known shall duly appear, as laAvyers say to have been " placed on record." The last words I heard him utter, Avere, AA'hen passing hurriedly through the hall, being busily occupied in the discharge of his laborious duties as district attorney, a poor Avoman stopped him and pleaded pov erty as a reason Avhy the county should not press a certain claim against her. Many men would have given a hasty or pe tulant answer. But he stopped patiently, and in the mild and kind tones of thc voice we so well remember, giving each AVord its deliberate emphasis assured her that " if she was so poor as she said she was, he would see that the county should deal le niently with her." How many to whom this notice may ap pear too trivial for publication, Avill read it and cooly say or think, ' Well, that Avas just Barker's way;" wliilst he Avho accu rately observes and reflects upon the nature LIFE OF BARKER. 157 of mankind will be reminded in Avords simi lar to those of Voltaire, that " these may be little matters, but they portray the cha racter." It noAV seems appropriate, that I should advert to Mr. Barker's health, which about this time began sensibly to fail. Frora 1833, (as I am informed by Dr. Charles Winne, who was for several years his attending physician,) he was subject to frequent attacks of cholic. His natural buoyancy of disposition and zeal in the professional en gagements which a large private business and official duties pressed upon him, caused him to disregard generally the injurious ef fects of great mental and bodily exertion in a depressed state of health. During the winter, spring and summer of 1846 all the symptoms of disease seemed to be aggravat ed and his health was evidently much im paired. Although he made extraordinary and injurious efforts to attend to his profes sional duties, he was subject to repeated interruptions from the failure of his bodily strength. On the' 19th of September, 1846, while in court, he Avas seized with a convuU 14* 158 LIFE OP BARKER. sivc fit of near half an hour's duration, fol- loAved by heavy sleep. He was at the time removed from the court room into the jury room in the same building, and the neces sary medical aid was rendered. In some two hours from the time of the seizure he was so far recovered as to be able to be re moved to the Mansion House, where he boarded Avith his family. His recovery from the effects of this shock was slow, but it promised to be perfect. His mental faculties Avere not perceptibly impaired in their clearness, but there seemed ever after in his best state of health to be a depres sion that depreciated their force and effec tiveness. This Avas more obvious after a recurrence of a similar attack, on the 20th of March, 1847. This followed a protract ed labor in court of four weeks duration, in which many exciting causes were tried, and his convalescence Avas consequently very slow. He continued quite feeble up to the time of leaving Buffalo on a journey. He Avas also subject to great depression of spi rits, and his mental faculties though still clear partook in a measure of the feeble- LIFE OP BARKER. 159 ness of his body. In thc early p:irt of June, 1847, increased debility and a threatened renewal of spasms, induced him at the soli citation of his friends to withdraAV from business and its cares, and seek for renewed health in traveling. He accordingly pro ceeded to Litchfield and Norwich, Connec ticut, where he spent some time among Mrs. Barker's relatives ; he proceeded thence to Rindge, and visited his mother, and frora thence to Halifax, where he spent much time at the fishing banks. During this tirae his health very much improved. He Avas subject to no sickness, except a brief period of pain frora the accident of dislocating his shoulder Avhile on a fishing excursion. His wonted cheerfulness re turned, and with it the hope that he could again pursue the profession he loved. Ho returned to Buffalo in August, and re ceived the hearty congratulations of his friends on his restored health and improved appearance. He at once resumed the du ties ofhis profession and of prosecuting at torney, (of which latter duties he had been kindly relieved by volunteering friends,) 160 LIFE OF BARKER. but it was soon perceptible that a few weeks exertion had destroyed all that he had gain ed during his absence. One of the last forensic efforts of Mr. Barker, was during the trial of a young midshipraan named William W. Pollock, for attempting the life of Mr. Elam R. Jewett, one of the publishers of the Buffalo Commercial Advertiser. The cause was tried in Buffalo, at the September term of the Circuit Court, before Hon. R. P. Mar vin. It naturally excited deep interest throughout the city and the court room was thronged during its continuance. In the Buffalo Republic, I find the following sketch : — "After considerable difficulty attendant upon getting a jury, one at last was obtain ed. When they were sworn, district at torney Barker in a style peculiar to himself and with his accustomed eloquence opened the case to the jury. He said the case Avas one of much inte rest and importance. This description of offense Avas one ofthe worst against the peace and security of society. The LIFE OP BARKER. 161 prisoner at the bar, Avas charged with at tempting the hfe of Mr. E. H. Jewett, one of the publishers of thc Commercial Adver tiser. The prisoner had occupied a respon sible station in community. He had no personal feeling to gratify, or malice against the prisoner, but was actuated only by a desire to discharge to the best of his ability and with fearlessness, his duty as prosecuting attorney. Hon. Millard Fill more, made an eloquent address in behalf of the prisoner, after which Mr. Barker folloAved for the people. He did not doubt that Mr. Fillmore felt as he ought (for he was the counsel ofthe prisoner) the importance ofthe verdict ofthe jury to him. He had feelings of sympathy with his fellow citizens. His was an unpleasant duty to discharge ; but believing as he did, that there had not occurred in the county of Erie, a case, the effect of an acquital in which, would he fraught Avith more serious consequences to the well being of society he should discharge his duty fearlessly and fully. What gentlemen of the jury, arc the facts of this case ? Avhy, this Wm. W. Pol- 162 LIFE OF BARKER. lock, the prisoner at the bar, has resided a year or more, in our city ; from some feelings of resentment ;it the pubhcation of an article reflecting as he thought, too harshly on his character, came into the counting room of Mr. .Jewett, and after ask ing hira a kw questions regarding the res ponsibility of the article in question, fired a pistol at hira which he dre^v frora beneath his cloak and but for the providential inter ference of a pocket book and its contents, Aviiich stood between hiin and his intended victim, Avould have taken his life. This, was performed in broad day light. It was a deed that Avould have been more appro priate if committed at t!ie South, Avhcre such offenses are winked at by juries ; but it wanted the southern chivalry of the thing. It was as coAvardly as unprovoked. Sup])ose the prisoner at the bar had been an unbe- friended and unknown peisonage ; AA^ould Ave have seen this array of distinguished coun.'^cl ; this tremendous effort made to clear hira ? No, had it been such a ca.se, the prisoner, Avould have been convicted and sentenced in a single day. The charge LIFE OP BARKER. 163 had been too often made, that persons who had wealthy and influential friends, had fre quently escaped with irapunity, while the friendless and destitute, even if they were innocent found a ready conviction. He trusted that in this case, guilt would not be permitted to shield itself behind tal ent however exalted it might be. See what a respectable physician testifies : If the shot had taken cfi'cct in the artery, near which it hit, death Avould have been the re- Bu't. Is he not responsible for the conse quences of the act? Did he not know what would result from the firing of the pistol at Mr. Jcwctt's body? According to Mr. F.'s argument, a man raust understand the laws of anatomy perfectly, before he can be convicted of a crime like the one the prisoner was charged with;, he must attend four or five courses of medical lectures. It was owing to no act or merit of the pris oner, that he was not tried for murder, his intention was good enough. Did he not select the weapon which is regarded among all nations as the most deadly — thc most murderous for such an object? Was not 164 LIFE OP BARKER. the prisoner in a hurry to kill his victim for fear of interruption from those in the store at the time? After he tried to shoot Mr. Jewett, did he not attempt to escape? Did this shoAv guilt or innocence? Was he not acquainted with the instrument he fired? What was his intention in firing? That is for you to determine gentlemen of the jury. The prisoner felt injured from a certain ar ticle Avhich appeared in Mr. Jewett's paper. Acting on that feeling he sought him in his counting room, weapon in hand, and at tempted his life. The verdict they were to render in this case would exercise a great influence on public opinion. The character adduced for Mr. Pollock by the high minded and gentlemanly officers of the steamer Michigan was of an irrelevant nature. He asked the jury how they could go beyond the evidence, and admit in extenuation the previous good character of the prisoner." It is but justice to Mr. Pollock, that I should state that though he was convicted and sentenced to thc state prison at Auburn, he was, after a short time pardoned by Gov ernor Young. The principal reason for so LIFE OP BARKER. 165 doing was the good character of Mr. Pol lock, previous to committing the deed for which he was tried and convicted. I come now to speak of the Syracuse de mocratic state convention of 1847. It was without doubt one of the most important political bodies ever convened in the Union. It was an extraordinary assemblage, wheth er the character of the men who composed it, or the momentous consequences which re sulted from its deliberations are considered. Mr. Barker was appointed by a county con vention of the democracy as one of the four delegates to represent Erie county. His associates were Messrs. H. B. Ransom, Stephen Holmes, and Isaac Potter. It is perhaps proper to mention that the seats of Mr. Barker and Mr. Potter were contes ted, but after submitting the facts to a com mittee of opposite views they were admit ted as the regular members. The part Mr. Barker took in the proceedings of the con vention was the last occasion in which he acted as a representative of his political friends. His health was precarious, but he yielded to their urgent solicitations15 166 LIFE OF BARKER. and accepted the appointment. The subject of the convention had attracted much attention throu