Si. a, I'll III y^LE UNIVERSITY LIBRABV 3 9002 05350 5492 Memoranda respecting the late Hon. Joseph Wood, New Haven, 1856. >Y^ILE«¥]MII¥IEI^SIIir¥« From the Library of SIMEON E. BALDWIN, Y '6i Gift of his children HELEN BALDWIN GILMAN ROGER SHERMAN BALDWIN, Y '90 1927 APR ll csimcrma the i.ate rf 1 " JOSEPH ¦¥ ^? I NEW HAVEM, GONK.. MEMORANDA BESFECTINQ THE LATE HON. JOSEPH VOOD, NEW HAVEN. CONN. PRINTED FOB TBE USE OF THE FAMILT. NEW HAVEN: PRINTED BY J. H. BENHAM, GLEBE BUILDING. 1856. Z^^2, GI3p SKETCH OF LIFE, &c. The paternal ancestors of Mr. Wood in this country, were Jonas, Samuel, Joseph, Joseph, 2d, and David.* Jonas Wood came to New England, probably Plymouth or Boston, from Halifax, in Yorkshire, Eng., in 1630, and sub sequently settled in Stamford, Conn., whence, in 1644, he removed to Huntington, (formerly Hempsted,) L. I. He was a man of great piety, respectability and influence, of excel lent education, and possessed of a large estate. Joseph Wood, 2d, great-grandson of Jonas, removed from Hunting ton to Stanwich parish in the town of Greenwich, Conn. ; at which place Joseph, (the late Judge Wood,) second son of David, and grandson of Joseph 2d, was born March 24th, 1779. His father was a respectable farmer and a man of piety. His mother was Sarah Ingersoll, a woman of great cheerfulness and amiability of disposition. Mr. Wood pursued farming till about sixteen years of age, when he commenced study preparatory to entering college. * The facts here stated respecting the ancestry of Mr. Wood, are from a paper found among his manuscripts, and were obtained by him in 1840 from Hon. Silas Wood, of Huntiagton, L. I. and in 1801 graduated at Yale College, New Haven. He read law under the direction of Judge Chauncey of New Haven, and was there admitted to the bar. He followed his profession in Stamford till the year 1826, when he removed to Bridgeport, and thence, in 1837, to New York city. In 1841, he removed to New Haven, where he continued to reside till the time of his death. For about ten years he held the office of Judge of Probate for the Dis trict of Stamford. After removing to New Haven he was for rsome itime Judge of the County Court, and in later years iheld the office of City Clerk. While residing in New York Ihe edited a periodical devoted to Agriculture, a subject in \which he always took a deep interest. In addition to pro- :fessional .duties, he spent much time and labor in collecting materials and preparing a memoir of Chief Justice Ellsworth, to whose second daughter, Frances, he was married May 10th, 1809. The work was never printed, and not long since he plaiced the manuscript in the hands of Mr. Flan ders, of Philadelphia, who is engaged in the preparation of " Lives of the Chief Justices," in several volumes, the first of which is already published. During the later years of his life, Mr. Wood devoted much itime to the study of the Scriptures and the investigation of tquestions of theology, particularly redemption, the resurrec- ition and the future life. His manuscripts on these subjects, however, are fragmentary and incomplete, for in the midst of his investigations he was called to exchange theory in these matters for experimental knowledge — faith for sight. In 1843, September 24th, he made a public profession of re ligion, (a step which he had long contemplated,) uniting with the First Church in New Haven, under the pastoral care of Rev. Dr. Bacon. He was chosen a deacon of this Church in 1848, and dischai-ged the duties of the office till the time of his death. As a Christian, he was consistent and uniform — not im pulsive, but making religion a matter of principle. Natu rally inclined to reserve, he seldom expressed freely his re ligious feelings to others. His views on theological subjects were clear, and in many respects original, for he was accus tomed to think for himself ; and taking the plain teachings of Scripture for his guide, he thought little of mere human authority in matters of religion. During his whole life, Mr. Wood enjoyed, in general, very excellent health. The only critical illness through which he passed, was a prolonged attack of pleurisy, in 1842. The disease which resulted in his death, as shown by a post mor tem exeimination, was ossification of the coronal artery of the heart. Other arteries, also, were similarly affected. So stealthy had been the approach of this disease, that he was not at £dl aware of its' existence, inasmuch as his general health was not sensibly impaired. He had indeed, at times, experienced pain and difficulty of breathing when walking rapidly, but had regarded it as arising from weakness of the lungs. Considering his constitutional shrinking from suff"ering and timidity in view of death, the manner of his removal from life — so free from conscious pain, so unassociated with sickness and the ordinary terrors of dissolution, so really a translation — can scarcely be looked upon as otherwise than merciful. He had finished his course, and suddenly "he was not, for God took him." The last moments of Judge Wood, and the manner of his death, are described in the following communication, kindly sent to the family by the Club of literary gentlemen to which he belonged, and at one of the weekly meetings of which, Thursday forenoon, Nov. 13, 1856, at the house of Presi dent Day, he was so suddenly taken from among the living. The following paper was adopted by the Club of retired gentlemen, at their session held in the study of Rev. Presi dent Day, D. D., Nov. 27th, 1856. " This Association would bow in reverent submission be fore the Supreme Ruler, who, by a most impressive act of his Providence, appeared in the midst of their circle at the last session, and called one of their number, instantaneously, out of this life into his eternal state. In a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, a highly respected and beloved mem ber. Judge Wood — after speaking for about thirty minutes in a clear and thorough manner to the question of the morn ing, and listening a few moments to the speaker who imme diately succeeded him — started from his chair, aS if with an instinctive impulse to rush to the door for breath, and fell down lifelesss upon the floor. Thus were the words with which he had just before concluded his speech — " This is all I have to say" — literally fulfilled, being the last utter ance ever to escape from his lips. In this solemn and impressive manner is this body again called to sorrow over the inroads made by death upon their rapidly thinning circle. Already within a few months have they recorded the deaths of those eminent inen, the Rev. James Murdock, D. D., and the Rev. Samuel Merwin. And now they have to add to the list the name of the Hon. Joseph Wood. On this occasion of their first meeting since that event, the Association would express their feelings in the following resolutions : Resolved, That in the death of Judge Wood, this body deplores the loss of -a fellow associate, highly esteemed for the pleasant society and the enlightened conference which he added to it by his presence. Resolved, That in the death which we deplore, the State has lost a virtuous citizen and an upright jurist ; the Church a devoted member and an efficient officer ; and the world a good and righteous man. Resolved, That we deeply sympathise in the affliction of the widow and children of the deceased, so suddenly be reaved of the presence, the counsels and the cares of an af fectionate husband and father ; and would record, for their consolation, the grace of God the Savior made manifest in enabling him during life to witness a good confession, and in taking him at death away from all his trials without a pang or struggle, to enter, we trust, upon his perfected state in glory." After adopting the above paper, it was voted that a copy, signed by the Chairman of the meeting, be presented to the widow and family of the deceased. JEREMIAH DAY, Chairman. Appended to the preceding paper, is the following report of the remarks of Mr. Wood on the occasion referred to, recorded from memory by the Rev. Dr. Fitch. The question before the Club on the morning on which Judge Wood died, was this : " What are the appropriate du ties of ministers of the Gospel, in reference to the civil gov ernment under which they live?" It was conceded that under this Republican government ministers of the Gospel, in their character as citizens, shared alike, in common with all citizens, in the duties and privi leges of controlling the course of government in the use of the elective franchise. It was conceded, too, that in their character as public preachers of the Gospel, it was an appro priate duty for them to intercede, they and their flocks, for the blessing of heaven to descend upon rulers ; and to teach the people the duty of submission to civil government. The chief point in the discussion turned upon the duty of their preaching in respect to questions of government at issue be fore the people ; political questions, or issues on which the people themselves are to act and decide, as the controlling power in this representative government. The Judge spoke to the following purport : That he might answer the general question somewhat difi"erently in respect to the different civil gorernments under which the ministers of Christ performed their office. In speaking to the sub jects of the Czar of Russia, the preacher did not speak to those who were responsible for the measures of government, and he had no duty to inculcate upon them as citizens but quiet submission to the government in all godliness and honesty, or in all things consistent with godliness and hon- esty. Under the constitutional government of Great Britain and the United States, there might be occasion for thc preachers of the Gospel to speak to the people of cases of politiccil duty, or to warn them against active fellowship in political crimes or sins. The ground which the Judge took was, the comprehen sive duty of the ministers of Christ to inculcate on the peo ple all the principles of religion and morality. Ministers, said he, are appointed of God to teach mankind the prin ciples of religion and morality. This was the commission of the Savior to the preachers of his Gospel, that they go out to all nations, " teaching them to observe all things what soever I have commanded you." There can be no question that the principles of morality upheld in the law of God and inculcated in the precepts of Christ, are comprehended in the instructions which they are to give to the people while ministering to them in the name of Christ. They are to inculcate on all, obedience to the laws of the Sabbath, of the family, of righteousness, of temperance, of kindness to the poor £md needy, and to reprove and rebuke, for the sake of correction, all sins against these laws. They act in their appropriate sphere of duty, when, in the name of God the Savior, they inculcate as they have opportunity and as the people need, these principles of morality. What then shall we say of cases in which the action of civil government is concerned in the plotting or execution of crime, and the people are called upon to aid the scheme ? Has the minis ter of God no warning to give ? Must he be silent ? But it is said that the preacher can have nothing to say in mat ters in which the action of civil government is concerned — 10 that it is no part of his business to preach politics. I do not pretend that it is an appropriate duty of preachers of the Gospel to give lectures on state policy, on questions that re late to merely temporal matters, and worldly expediency. But if measures contemplated by government, or any part of the people, which solicit public support, are themselves a manifest invasion upon the principles of morality — such as the extension of polygamy, or intemperance, or public rob bery, or unjust exaction and cruelty — then it is that politics have invaded the domain of the preacher ; and come up against these injunctions of moral duty which he is to pro claim and uphold in the name of God, whether men will hear or forbear. He remains in his appropriate sphere of duty, when, in the name of Christ, he warns and rebukes those who, with their politics, thus come up against the do main of moral duty. The formation of a political party, committed to the enaction of any law or scheme involving moral evil, cannot revoke the authority of Christ ; or the duties of the preachers of his Gospel to uphold that autho rity against invasion. There have been parties in the State, in reference to the Sabbath, to temperance, and other moral duties ; and ministers have inculcated moral obligation on these topics, not to put down a mere political party, as such, but to persuade men to righteousness, to confirm the faith ful, to enlist the undecided, to convert the erring, and aid the cause of God and righteousness against its enemies. Now if we pass from thei broad commission given by Christ to the preachers of his Gospel, we have an example in Paul, an inspired apostle of Christ, to show particularly that ministers of the Gospel are to apply the principles of 11 religion and morality to the sphere of political action. It is found in a precept which he gives in his epistle to the Phi- lippians, (i : 27*) ; that they conform their political life in the State to the Gospel. " Let your conversation be," it is rendered in our translation, " as becometh the Gospel of Christ :" — in accordance with its religious and moral teach ings. " iroXjrEusrf^s" is the Greek word which the apostle uses. Act politically, as becometh the Gospel of Christ. Let your conduct as citizens, your conduct in the State, correspond with the teachings of Christ. In other words, let the Gospel rule you as you act in society, and with the citizens of the State — and be not withdrawn from your duty, (as the context shows,) by fear of adversaries in the State around you. It would seem fi-om this precept, therefore, that ministers are to teach the christian religion and its morality as the duty of men, not merely individually, but in their relation to their fellow citizens and the State. This is all I have to say. The funeral of Judge Wood was attended at his late resi dence, on Monday, Nov. 17th, on which occasion were present all his children, except a son who arrived the day following, and before the remains were finally deposited. * This text was found written in Greek and English among some business memoranda in Mr. Wood's pocket-book — doubtless for use on this occasion. Famptiisji Binder Gaylord Bros.. Inc. Makers Syracuse, N. Y. PAI. JAN 21, 1308 --vf"-' , r - ¦- Jj." "¦ „ "* i IS I; iirl