5 = ¦ : %\U-

', ' ¦ ':'

'•'=: '-;* t ' I.

i- -

YALE UNIVERSITY
ART LIBRARY

ENGLISH SOCIETY
OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
IN CONTEMPORARY ART

I_)I11C1',\ ( IIAKliil I I', Willi THK I'KlNll'lss Rii\M., ,\Mi ¦nil'. lUrUKSS OV .\\r.\Sri',K.
I''r.>tn <r ll',!/f-r ,it/,./fr /*''<7r('/;/;' />)' l-'i.ithis C,..'<'S, R..-t.
IhiiiJi Miiseiiiii.

ENGLISH SOCIETY
OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
IN CONTEMPORART ART

BY

RANDALL DAVIES, F.S.A.
AUTHOR OF "CHELSEA OLD CHURCH," &'C.

LONDON
SEELEY AND CO. LIMITED, GREAT RUSSELL STREET
New York : E. P. DUTTON .^ CO.
1907

MADE AND PRINTED
111 GKBAT BKITAIN.

klo

Printed by BALLANTYNE, Hanson &¦ Co.
At the Ballantyne Press, Edinburgh

PREFACE

Apart from any question of sentiment, that may sanctify one age
or execrate another, the Eighteenth Century is a period that is
exceptionally interesting to glance over in search of illustrations of
Society in this country. For, as it happens, it is a period of
continuous development in the art of painting ; from a time, that
is to say, when there was practically no English painting at all, till
the arrival of Hogarth and his minor contemporaries ; from him to
the great age of Reynolds and Gainsborough ; and though after
these two nothing greater could be expected, yet in the close of the
century, when their influence was still paramount, and when the
wider diffusion of artistic influences that followed on the establish
ment of the Royal Academy was giving a stimulus to almost every
kind of art, it can hardly be said that there was any retrogression.
At the same time, the choice of illustrations for a subject of
this sort must necessarily prove to be a matter of some little
difficulty ; for while our public galleries are confined to exhibiting
only works of the first importance, the minor pictures, from which
the bulk of the selection would naturally be made, are mostly in
country houses, and not easily available for reproduction. But the
reader will, I hope, so far appreciate the series here given as to
share the gratitude I feel for the kindness of both owners and
custodians in helping me to make it so full of interest and variety.
To others, also, whom I have invoked and " found such fair assist
ance," I wish to acknowledge myself most gratefully indebted.
R. D.

1741 9

CONTENTS

CHAPTER I page
The Augustan Age . ... . . . i

CHAPTER II
Hogarth and His Times ...... 20
CHAPTER III
The Influence of Reynolds and Gainsborough . . 40
CHAPTER IV
The Close of the Century . . . . '59
INDEX  TJ

VU

*

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

printed in colours
PAGE
Queen Charlotte with the Princess Royal and the Duchess of Ancaster. From a
Water-colour Drawing by Francis Cotes, R.A. (British Museum) Frontispiece .
Author Reading from a Manuscript to Four Ladies. From a Water-colour Drawing
by M. Haughton. (Randall Davies)  48
Carlisle House. From a Drawing in Chalks by J. Raphael Smith. (Victoria and
Albert Museum)  56
Buckingham House. From a Water-colour Drawing by Edward Dayes. (Victoria
and Albert Museum)  62
PRINTED IN MONOCHROME
A Pinch of Snuff. From a Pencil Drawing by Marcellus Laroon. (British Museum) 6
The Duchess of Ormond. From a Mezzotint by John Smith after the Painting by
Kneller  14
Mariage a la Mode — Shortly after Marriage. By W. Hogarth. (National
Gallery.) From a Photograph by F. Hanfstaengl  20
The Wanstead Assembly. By W. Hogarth (South London Art GaUery) . . 22
Gustavus Viscount Boyne. From the Painting by Hogarth. (Viscount Boyne) . 24
The Duke of Montagu's Wedding. From the Painting by Marcellus Laroon . 24
The Enraged Husband. From a Drawing by "Joseph Highmore. (British Museum) 26
Illustration to " Pamela." From an Engraving by Benoist after the Painting by
Joseph Highmore  28
Illustration to " Pamela." From an Engraving by L. Truchy after the Painting by
Joseph Highmore  28
Vauxhall. From an Engraving after 1. Rowlandson. (G. Harland Peck, Esq.) . 30
Taste A la Mode, 1745. From an Engraving after Boitard  32
Masquerade at Ranelagh Gardens, April 26, 1749. From an Engraving after
Boitard  32
Concert at Montagu House. From a Drawing by Marcellus Laroon. (British Museum) 34
Two Illustrations to " Pamela." From Drawings by H. F. Gravelot. (British
Museum)  36
A Family Party. From a Drawing by Philip Mercier. (British Museum) . 38
The Royal Academy of 1787. From an Engraving by P. A. Martini after Ramberg 42
ix

LISr OF ILLUSTRATIONS

PAGE

The Eliot Family. By Sir Joshua Reynolds. From a Water-colour version in the
possession of G, Harland Peck, Esq  4^
Greenwich Hill. From a Print dated 1761. (Crace Collection, British Museum) 50
Children of Thomas Milward. From the Painting by J. Russell ... 52
The Book Shop. From a Drawing by J. Raphael Smith. (British Museum) . 54
Two Gentlemen. From a Drawing by Zoffany. (Victoria and Albert Museum) . 54
A Windy Day. From a Water-colour Drawing by R, Dighton, (Victoria and Albert
Museum)  60
A Family Group. From a Drawing for the Picture at Shardeloes by J, H, Mortimer,
(Randall Davies)  64
Children of Francis Sitwell, Esq. From the Painting by J. S, Copley, (Sir George
Sitwell, Bart.)  66
A Family Group. From a Silhouette by Ihonard, (Sir George Sitwell, Bart.) . 68
Children of George III. By J, S, Copley, (Buckingham Palace.) From a Photo
graph hy W, E, Gray  70
A Family Group. From the Painting by Zoffany, (Lord Sherborne) ... 72
A Family Party. From the Painting by Zoffany, (Countess Cowper) ... 72
A Country Race-Course. From an Engraving by W. Mason .... 72
Cricket. From an Engraving by Benoist after the Painting by F. Hayman ... 72
Skating. From a Print after the Painting by J. C. Ibbetson .... 72
The Family of Josiah Wedgwood. From the Painting by George Stubbs. (Cecil
Wedgwood, Esq.)  74
Spring Gardens. From a Water-colour Drawing by 1. Rowlandson. (G. Harland
Peck, Esq.)  74

English Society of the Eighteenth Century
in Contemporary Art

CHAPTER I ,
THE AUGUSTAN AGE
That Society flourished in England under Queen Anne and King
George I. is abundantly proved by contemporary records, but they
are not those of the brush ; and while our impressions of France
during the same period are coloured by the exquisite fancies of
Watteau, Lancret, and Pater, it is to books and letters that we
owe our knowledge of nearly all that was going on in England.
Tradition, it is true, has lent a tinge of colour to the black and
white of history in picturing Queen Anne sitting in the sun ; but
no painter has preserved the incident — or was it habit ? — in one of
those matchless Fetes Galantes that were so freely and enchantingly
being painted in France across the Channel ; and it is only in imagi
nation, tinged perhaps with sentiment, that we are permitted to think
of her as other than a very prosaic and matter-of-fact lady. Had
Watteau (who actually did visit England) found favour with Princes,
and left us richer for one or two pictures of them, what a different
impression we might now enjoy in recalling the glories of that
Augustan age ! At Hampton Court, perhaps, he might have caught
them, in the full bloom of the chestnuts then but lately planted,
and shown us the last of the Stuarts linked hand in hand with the
fair Jennings, and surrounded by Swift, Addison, Harley, and Steele,
all in the loosest and lightest of silks, listening to Marlborough
playing a lute ; but, as it is, we have nothing better than the sort of
art that may be seen in a couple of minor pictures at Kensington

1 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
Palace, the one a formal and stilted representation of the Queen
addressing the House of Lords, with the then all-powerful Sarah
standing behind her, painted by Peter Tillemans ; the other a slightly
more interesting piece by Peter Angelis, of an installation of four
Knights of the Garter in 17 13.
In the latter there is something like an attempt at a picture, for
Angelis (or Angillis, as it ought to be), who was a native of Dunkirk,
but worked in England long enough to be noticed by Walpole, had
a certain vogue as a painter of landscapes in which figures were
introduced, though the present example hardly justifies Walpole's
statement that his manner was a mixture of Teniers and Watteau,
with more grace than the former and more nature than the latter.
It is interesting, however, as containing portraits not only of the
Queen, but of four such prominent and doughty knights as Harley,
Earl of Oxford; Henry Grey, Duke of Kent; Charles Mordaunt,
Earl of Peterborough; and John, Earl Poulett, all of whom were
considerable figures in their time.
France, however, was then possessed of all that was really rare
and beautiful in painting ; but she was also singing to her children
'¦'¦ Marlbrook s'en va-fen guerre!" and could spare but little of her
artistic wealth for the English, who, for their part, were far too much
occupied in reading "The Conduct of the Allies," and in preening
themselves upon the Protestant succession, to care very much for the
fine arts.
At the same time there seems to have been a vogue, at least
among the fine ladies, for la mode Franfaise, in this as in every other
age of which any records exist of English Society. In the matter
of dress and fashion it was never beneath British dignity to learn
from their cultured though hereditary enemies ; and one of the earUest
satirical prints of this century, published in 1707, when Europe
was still ringing with Marlborough's victories, exposes this weakness,
among others, with startling candour. These so-called satirical prints,
of which some thousands are catalogued in the collections at the
British Museum, are by no means the least interesting source of
information about any period ; and in the absence of anything of
artistic importance at this particular time, it is worth while to glance

THE .AUGUSTAN ^GE 3
at a few examples. Most of them may be referred to some particular
event or topic, such as the South Sea Bubble, Dr. Sacheverell, or
the Hell Fire Clubs ; but there are some that are general in their
application, and, without attaching too much weight to them, we may
get some sharp hints on men and manners from these crude and
outspoken publications. The one in question, for instance, is so
sweeping an indictment of a period which we are used to call
Augustan, that even its title leaves us breathless — " The Ass Age,
or the world in Hieroglyphick, an amusement greatly resembling the
Humours of the Present Time." Its range is wide, and the repre
sentations of various social units all mounted on asses are fully
explained in verse. A few of the couplets on the lady of quality will
show the sort of thing aimed at, even if (to the cynic) they do not
seem to differentiate this particular epoch from any other: —
" Her Ladyship may next the ass engage
Mounted with all her modish equipage :
Pride aad new fashions are her daily prayers,
And all must come from France that e'er she wears.
Nothing but what is foreign must be seen ;
Her talk is French, her very air and mien.
With French cold-tea to cure her of the spleen.
Her page and monkey, too, from France must come,
For she despises everything at home ;
Nor had she yielded with such complaisance
To ride, but that she thought the ass might come from France !
With Pride incurable e'en let her sit,
Nothing, unless the ass, can teach her wit."
Another, probably published a year or two later, is "The Tea
Table," to which an interminable length of doggerel is subjoined. " The
Coffehous Mob " is the title of a third that forms the frontispiece to a
volume called "Vulgus Brittanicus, or the British Hudibras," which
was published in 17 10, the author being the somewhat notorious
Ned Ward.
" The Diabolical Masquerade, or the Dragon Feast, as acted by the
Hell Fire Club at Somerset House in the Strand," is a subject that
might easily be put aside as beyond the limits of fact or even pro
bability — the scene is a debauch in which a party seated at table are
disguised as Pluto, Proserpine, and various animals and demons — were

4 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
it not for an order of the Privy Council which was advertised in all the
newspapers (April 28, 1721) "for the suppression of the blasphemous
societies called Hell Fire Clubs." It appears to be a fact that there
were no less than three of these clubs or societies existing in London,
to which upwards of forty persons of quality of both sexes belonged,
and there even exists a picture, belonging to Sir Compton Domvile,
which is actually inscribed " The Hell Fire Club," and is a por
trait of Lord Santry and four of his companions in this curious
phase of social excitement.
There are plenty of other sources, too, from which it may be
gathered that the reigns of Queen Anne and her successor were not
all that the fairest fancies have painted them ; and while the names
of Addison and Steele are the first to occur to any well-regulated
mind as those of the representative men of the time, there is Defoe
to be reckoned with ; and there is also Mrs. Manley, as Steele,
indeed, found for himself. The "New Atalantis" — an island very
remote from Bacon's with one syllable less— was peopled by an
aristocracy with such romantic histories that it is much to be regretted
that it was never illustrated. Mrs. Haywood's " Utopia," too, —
which again must not be confused with Sir Thomas More's — would
have been a good subject for any contemporary pencil.
As for painters of portraits, the only one of any note in Queen
Anne's reign was, of course. Sir Godfrey Kneller ; and he was
already past his prime ; or, as Walpole puts it, was lessened by his
reputation as he chose to make it subservient to his fortune.
" Had he lived in a country," says Walpole, " where his merit had
been rewarded according to the worth of his productions, instead
of the number, he might have shone in the roll of the greatest
masters ; but he united the highest vanity with the most con
summate negligence of character — at least, where he offered one
picture to fame, he sacrificed twenty to lucre ; and he met with
customers of so little judgment, that they were fond of being
painted by a man who would gladly have disowned his works the
moment they were paid for."
At the present time indeed Kneller's reputation is very low, and
the makers of a hundred popular or learned books on his more

THE AUGUSTAN ^GE • 5
fashionable successors have not as yet received the encouragement
necessary to produce even a line about him. That he prostituted
his capabilities to making a fortune is of course notorious, and it
is doubtless true that he himself said that history painting only
revived the memory of the dead who could give him no testimony
of their gratitude, but that when he painted the living he gained
wherewithal to live from their bounty. So great is the number of
his inferior portraits, in fact, of which he scarcely more than
touched the faces, that it is no wonder he is neglected, and the
fact that he was a pupil of Rembrandt, and a very capable one,
forgotten. Walpole, to be sure, while none too sparing of his
censure, throws as much of his blame on the age in which he
lived as on the painter himself. " His airs of heads have extreme
grace," he says, " the hair admirably disposed, and if the locks seem
unnaturally elevated, it must be considered as an instance of the
painter's art. He painted in an age when the women erected
edifices of three storeys on their heads. Had he represented such
preposterous attire, in half a century his works would have been
ridiculous. To lower their dress to a natural level when the eye
was accustomed to pyramids would have shocked their prejudices
and diminished the resemblance. He took a middle way, and
weighed out ornament to them of more natural materials. Still it
must be owed there is too great a sameness in his airs, and no
imagination at all in his compositions. See but a head, it interests
you — -uncover the rest of the canvas, and you wonder faces so
expressive could be employed so insipidly. In truth, the age
demanded nothing correct, nothing complete."
Of the lesser lights one or two are worth mentioning, if only
to prove the bare existence of any sort of painting at this period.
Boit, for instance, whose father was a Frenchman, and who was
born at Stockholm, came to England to practise his trade of
jeweller ; but his ill success drove him to teaching children in the
country to draw. In this profession he established the precedent of
falling in love with one of his pupils, and the affair being dis
covered — he had engaged her to marry him — he was thrown into
prison. In that confinement, says Walpole, which lasted two years.

6 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
he studied enamelling, an art to which he fixed on his return to
London, and practised with the greatest success. The prices he
obtained were extraordinary, thirty guineas for a copy of Seymour's
picture by Kneller, sixty for a lady's head, and for a few plates j^foo.
His principal achievement, however, was in obtaining an advance
of no less than ;^i700 for the execution of a plate of but 24X i8
inches representing the Queen, Prince George, the principal officers
and ladies of the Court, and Victory introducing the Duke of Marl
borough and Prince Eugene ; France and Bavaria prostrate on the
ground, amidst standards, arms, and trophies. The design was painted
by Laguerre in oils, and Boit erected a furnace and workshops in
Mayfair, and commenced operations. His difficulties retarded the
work so long that before it was nearly completed Prince George,
who had done most to encourage it, died. This put a stop to the
work for some time, " during which happened the revolution at
Court, extending itself even to Bolt's work. Their Graces of Marl
borough were to be displaced even in the enamel, and her Majesty
ordered Boit to introduce Peace and Ormond instead of Victory
and Churchill. These alterations were made in the sketch which
had not been in the fire . . . Prince Eugene refused to sit. The
Queen died. Boit ran into debt, his goods were seized by execution,
and he fled to France ; where he changed his religion, was counten
anced by the Regent, obtained a pension of ;£2 8o per annum and
an apartment, and was much admired in a country where they had
seen no enameller since Petitot. . ."
Walpole also mentions one or two other plates of Bolt's, amongst
which was one at Kensington of a considerable size, representing
Queen Anne sitting and Prince George standing by her.
Another interesting, though not particularly important artist,
who settled in England in the latter years of the seventeenth
century and lived to see the commencement of the eighteenth, was
Marcellus Lauron — better known, so far as he can be said to be
known at all, as Old Laroon, as he was father to another Marcellus
of whom I shall have more to say presently. He was born at the
Hague in 1653, and came to England early in life, and found
employment under Kneller, for whom he painted the draperies of

//.J

r'

A Pinch Ol' S.NUrr. 1-rom a pencil dia-ioiug by Marcellus Larooti. British Museniu.
THE .AUGUSTAN .AGE 7
his innumerable portraits. His claim to be mentioned in the present
chapter rests on his designs for the seventy-four plates engraved
by Tempest, and published in 171 1, usually known as "Tempest's
London Cries." As Laroon died in 1702 — the day after King
William — these figures barely come into our century; but they are
near enough and certainly of sufficient interest to justify their
inclusion, though not distinguished for any particular beauty or
artistic force as engraved by Tempest. Of the seventy-four plates,
about sixty are "Cries," the rest being characters. Of the "Cries,"
most are merely the minor commodities of everyday life, such as
brooms, pots, baskets, and eatables, among which is a remarkable
plenty of all sorts of fish; a few of them, however, are strange
enough to be noticed, if only for the lilt of them —
Pretty maids, pretty pins, pretty women.
A bed mat or a door mat.
Lily white vinegar threepence a quart.
Twelve pence a peck oysters.
Old shoes for some brooms.
Hot baked wardens hot (Warden pears).
Colly Molly Puff (pastry).
Any old iron, take money for.
Buy a white line, a jack line, a clothes line.
Why some things should still be cried in the streets and others be
only obtainable in shops would require a good deal of explanation ;
and that brings us to consider how much the everyday life of a
subject of Queen Anne really differed from our own. A couple
of centuries seems a long time, but it is not really so long as it
sounds, and if any of us were suddenly asked what differences we
thought there probably were between the social life of the Romans
in 100 B.C., and in 100 a.d., we should probably say, none at all.
Some amusing descriptions of English society are given in the
letters of a Swiss gentleman, Mons. C^sar de Saussure, who visited
England in 1725, and again a little later, which will enable us to
test the truth of this. These have recently been published. In
English, by Mr. John Murray, and, though of no particular im
portance in themselves, are well worth reading, if only to find how
very little some of our ordinary manners and customs have changed

8 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
in a century and three-quarters. In fact, it has been questioned
whether the letters are altogether genuine, and it is not difficult
to see why ; for one is often assailed by the suspicion that some
modern Gulliver is slyly poking fun at his readers. In such passages,
for instance, as the description of cricket : — " The English are very
fond of a game called cricket. For this purpose they go into a
large open field and knock a small ball about with a piece of wood.
I will not attempt to describe the game to you ; it is too complicated ;
but it requires agility and skill, and every one plays it, the common
people and also men of rank. Sometimes one county plays against
another county. The papers give notice of these meetings before
hand and, later, tell you which side has come off victorious. Specta
tors crowd to these games when they are important."
Translation has no doubt invested a description of this sort with
a somewhat remarkable air of modernity, and there are other passages
which, though doubtless genuine enough, seem to have been some
what freely translated for modern readers. " The populace has
other amusements, and very rude ones ; such as throwing dead
dogs and cats and mud at passers-by on certain festival days.
Another amusement which is very inconvenient to passers-by Is
football. For this game a leather ball filled with air is used, and is
kicked about with the feet. In cold weather you sometimes see a
score of rascals in the streets kicking at a ball, and they will break
panes of glass and smash the windows of coaches, and also knock
you down without the slightest compunction; on the contrary, they
will roar with laughter."
The fact of the matter is that the character of a nation is not
seriously modified by altered conditions and what are called improve
ments In the social life. Superficially, of course, the modification is
proportionate to the Improvement, and the institution of the police
force alone has entirely changed the condition of the streets during
the last century or so. But were the police disbanded to-morrow,
the next day would find the old conditions obtaining. A London
house of half a century ago was in every way the same as those
built In the reign of Queen Anne, and even the invention of iron
girders, telephones, and bath-rooms has hardly altered them now—

THE AUGUSTAN .AGE 9
except when they are flats. But let us hear a little more from
De Saussure.
The path, he observes of the Mall, is every spring bestrewn with
tiny sea-shells which are then crushed by means of a heavy roller.
Society comes to walk here on fine warm days from seven to ten in
the evening, and In winter from one to three o'clock. English men
and women are fond of walking, and the park is so crowded at times
that you cannot help touching your neighbour. Some people come
to see, some to be seen, and others to seek their fortunes. In those
days the Thames was also a favourite resort, and De Saussure is amused
at the conversations there on fine summer evenings ; for it is the
custom, he tells, for any one on the water to call out whatever he
pleases to other occupants of boats, even were it to the King himself,
and no one has a right to be shocked. Dr. Johnson, we know, availed
himself of this privilege when assailed by the waterman, and De
Saussure gives a curious instance of how a Queen might be maligned
by the vulgar, even in those days, when the august Anne was often
called "Brandy-bottle," on account of a supposed weakness for
spirits. He also noted that amusing but now quite forgotten float
ing pleasure resort called The Folly, which was a large boat moored
near Somerset House, In which there was a band of musicians,
playing to water nymphs who ate and drank with Tritons and
other sea divinities who went to visit them.
The sanctuary of fashion, however, seems to have been what
De Saussure calls "The Ring," in Hyde Park, which he describes
as a round place two or three hundred feet in diameter, shut In by
railings, and surrounded by fine trees. Here, on Sundays during
the warm season, between five and six o'clock, the fine ladles and
gentlemen came and drove slowly round in order to see and to
be seen, there being sometimes as many as one or two hundred
chariots. Of the fine ladies, and in fact of all English ladies,
¦whether fine or not, the gallant visitor has a great deal to say, and
I fancy that at least a fair proportion of my readers will consider
it worth listening to.
" You are aware, I know," he writes, " that the women of this
country are said to be beautiful, and I must own that it is the truth.

IO ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
and they are so more especially in the country. Nothing can be
more charming and attractive than these country girls. Their com
plexions are like lilies and roses ; they have a look of health that
entrances you ; and their manners are artless, simple, and modest. . . .
You do not see many beautiful women in London Society, and at
Court I remarked only four or five who could pass muster. . . .
Most English women are fair and have pink and white complexions,
soft though not expressive eyes, and slim, pretty figures, of which they
are very proud and take great care, for in the morning, as soon as
they rise, they don a sort of bodice which encircles their waists tightly.
Their shoulders and throats are generally fine. They are fond of
ornaments, and old and young alike wear four or five patches, and
always two large ones on the forehead. Few women curl or powder
their hair, and they seldom wear ribbons, feathers, or flowers, but
little headdresses of cambric or of magnificent lace on their pretty,
well-kept hair. They pride themselves on their neatly shod feet,
on their fine linen, and on their gowns, which are made according
to the season either of rich silk or of cotton from the Indies. Very
f&vf women wear woollen gowns. Even servant maids wear silks on
Sundays and holidays, when they are almost as well dressed as their
mistresses. Gowns have enormous hoops, short and very wide sleeves,
and it is the fashion to wear little mantles of scarlet or of black velvet
and small hats of straw that are vastly becoming. Ladies even of
the highest rank are thus attired when they go walking or to make
a simple visit. English women and men are very clean ; not a day
passes by without their washing their hands, faces, necks and throats
in cold water, and that in winter as well as in summer.
" I must now give you my experience of the character of English
women. I find them gentle, frank, and artless, and they do not try
to conceal their sentiments and passions. Generally speaking they
are not coquettish, they do not simper affectedly, nor do they make
a show of displeasing, bold airs. On the contrary their modest
demeanour charms you, and they soon lose their timidity, and will
banter with you. They are rather lazy, and few do any needle
work, but spend their time eating or walking, and going to the
play or assemblies, where games are played." English women are

THE .AUGUSTAN .AGE ii
tender-hearted (he further observes), and capable of great resolution
to show their love, which is the cause of many Ill-assorted marriages ;
but neither husbands nor wives in these cases are jealous.
That we should have to turn to books for all our ideas of what
Society was In these days, without any sort of illustration to guide
us except the portraits of its more noticeable units, is the more
regrettable when we think of how much the old Dutch painters, for
instance, have recorded of their everyday life. But it is comforting
to reflect that of all the life-like characters depicted in these match
less Dutch pictures, there were hardly any who were sufficiently dis
tinguished to excite any curiosity as to who they were or what they
did, while in England the reign of Queen Anne was " so illustrated
by heroes, poets, and authors," that there Is something almost
ungracious in even commenting on the non-existence of a school of
painting. " We are now arrived," says Walpole of George I.'s reign, " at
the period in which the arts were sunk to the lowest ebb in Britain.
... Sir Godfrey Kneller still lived, but only in name, which he
prostituted by suffering the most wretched daubings of hired sub
stitutes to pass for his works, while at most he gave himself the
trouble of taking the likeness of the persons who sat to him. His
bold and free manner was the sole admiration of his successors, who
thought they had caught his style, when they neglected drawing,
probability, and finishing. . . . The habits of the time were shrunk
to awkward coats and waistcoats for the men ; and for the women,
to tight-laced gowns, round hoops, and half-a-dozen squeezed plaits
of linen, to which dangled two unmeaning pendants, called lappets,
not half covering the straight-drawn hair. . . . Linen, from what
economy I know not, is seldom allowed in those portraits, even to
the ladies, who lean carelessly on a bank, and play with a parrot
they do not look at, under a tranquillity which ill accords with
their seeming situation, the slightness of their vestment and the
lankness of their hair having the appearance of their being just
risen from the bath, and found none of their clothes to put on, but
a loose gown."
Of the work of Charles Jervas, who, after Kneller, had the

12 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
greatest vogue as a portrait painter during the reign of George I.,
there is a fair example at the National Portrait Gallery — Catherine
Hyde, the beautiful and witty Duchess of Queensberry ; but the
reader will possibly be more entertained by Walpole's amusing sketch
of the artist tljan by the sight of any of his work. " Between the
badness of the age's taste," he writes, " the dearth of good masters,
and a fashionable reputation, Jervas sat at the top of his profession ;
and his own vanity thought no encomium disproportionate to his
merit. Yet he was defective in drawing, colouring, composition, and
even in that most necessary, and perhaps most easy talent of a
portrait painter, likeness. In general his pictures are a light flimsy
kind of fan-painting as large as the life. Yet I have seen a few of
his works highly coloured ; and it is certain that his copies of Carlo
Maratti, whom most he studied and imitated, were extremely just,
and scarce inferior to the originals. It is a well-known story of him
that having succeeded happily in copying (he thought In surpassing)
a picture of Titian, he looked at the one, then at the other, and
then with parental complacency cried, 'Poor little Tit! how he
would stare ! ' But what will recommend the name of Jervas to
inquisitive posterity was his intimacy with Pope, whom he instructed
to draw and paint . . . and who has enshrined the feeble talents of
the painter in the lucid amber of his glowing lines. The repeated
name of Lady Bridgwater in that epistle was not the sole effect of
chance, of the lady's charms, or of the conveniency of her name to
the measure of the verse. Jervas had ventured to look on that fair
one with more than a painter's eye; so entirely did the lovely form
possess his imagination, that many a homely dame was delighted to
find her picture resemble Lady Bridgwater. Yet neither his pre
sumption nor his passion could extinguish his self-love. One day,
as she was sitting to him, he ran over the beauties of her face with
rapture — 'But,' said he, 'I cannot help telling your Ladyship that
you have not a handsome ear.' 'No!' said Lady Bridgwater;
'pray, Mr. Jervas, what is a handsome ear.?' He turned aside his
cap and showed her his own ..."
Swift's portrait had been painted by Jervas, which he appears to
have rolled up and sent (or a copy of it) to " M. D.," as he tells

THE .AUGUSTAN .AGE 13
her to treat it carefully and not hang it over the back of a chair.
It is regrettable that his long journal to Stella contains so little
that is actually descriptive of the brilliant society he moved in ; but
the mere mention of dinners and assemblies and visits seems to
have been enough for Stella, and we seldom get more than even a
snapshot portrait of any of the characters. The following passages
are 'perhaps worth quoting as relating to the matter In hand : —
"17 1 2. December 19. — The Duchess of Ormond promised
me her picture, and coming home to-night I found hers and
the Duke's both In my chamber. Was not that a pretty civil
surprise ? Yes, and they are In fine gilded frames, too. I am
writing a letter to thank her, which I will send to-morrow
morning. I'll tell her she is such a prude that she will not
let so much as her picture be alone in a room with a man
unless the Duke's be with it; and so forth."
"17 1 2-3. February 8. — Lady Orkney has given me her
picture ; a very fine original of Sir Godfrey Kneller's ; it is
now amending. He has favoured her squint admirably and
you know how I love a cast in the eye."
'¦'¦February 27. — Did I tell you that I have a very fine
picture of Lady Orkney, an original, by Sir Godfrey Kneller,
three-quarters length? I have it now with a fine frame. Lord
Bolingbroke and Lady Masham have promised to sit for me ;
but I despair of Lord Treasurer ; only I hope he will give me
a copy, and then I shall have all the pictures of those I really
love here ; just half-a-dozen, only I'll make Lord Keeper give
me his print In a frame."
" 1713. April II. — I dined at Lord Treasurer's with his Satur
day company. We had ten at table, all lords but myself and
the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Argyle went off at six, and
was In very Indifferent humour as usual. Duke of Ormond
and Lord Bolingbroke were absent. Lord Treasurer showed
us a small picture, enamelled work, and set in gold, worth
about twenty pounds; a picture, I mean of the Queen, which
she gave to the Duchess of Marlborough, set in diamonds.

14 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
When the Duchess was leaving England, she took off all the
diamonds and gave the picture to one Mrs. Higgins (an old
Intriguing woman, whom everybody knows), bidding her make
the best of it she could. Lord Treasurer sent to Mrs. Higgins
for the picture, and gave her a hundred pounds for it. Was
ever such an ungrateful beast as the Duchess.? Or did you
ever hear such a story.? I suppose the Whigs will not believe
it. Pray, try them. Takes off the diamonds and gives away
the picture, to an insignificant woman, as a thing of no con
sequence : and gives it her to sell like a piece of old-fashioned
plate ! Is she not a detestable slut .? "
This picture of the Duke of Ormond occasioned an effusion
from Matthew Prior that sounds hardly as complimentary to the
artist as to his subject : —
" Out from the injured canvas, Kneller, strike
These lines too faint : the picture is not like.
Exalt thy thought ; and try thy toil again :
Dreadful in arms on Landen's glorious plain
Place Ormond's Duke : impendent in the air
Let his keen sabre comet-like appear." &c.
Swift has several notes of picture auctions in his correspondence
with Stella, that throw a little light on the sort of interest that was
taken in art at this time. " I sauntered about this morning (2
January 17 13), and went with Dr. Pratt to a picture auction, where
I had like to be drawn in to buy a picture that I was fond of, but
it seems was good for nothing. Pratt was there to buy some pictures
for the Bishop of Clogher, who resolves to lay out ten pounds to
furnish his house with curious pieces." On the 6th March next:
" I was to-day at an auction of pictures with Pratt, and laid out two
pound five shillings for a picture of Titian, and if it were a Titian
it would be worth twice as many pounds. If I'm cheated, I'll part
with it to Lord Masham; if it be a bargain I'll keep it to myself.
That's my conscience. But I made Pratt buy several pictures for
Lord Masham. Pratt is a great virtuoso that way." A couple of
days later he laid out another fourteen shillings — whether on another
Titian or not he does not say. Next day he was at another auction ;

The Duchess of Ormond. From a mezzotint by John Smilh afler the painting by Knelled

THE .AUGUSTAN .AGE 15
" and a great auction it was. I made Lord Masham lay out forty
pounds. There were pictures sold of twice as much value apiece."
On the 25 th March was another, where he met the Duke of Beaufort,
and " the Bishop of Clogher has bought abundance of pictures, and
Dr. Pratt has got him very good pennyworths."
But though we have only snapshots of the realities of Society
in his journal to Stella, Swift has woven a wonderfully elaborate
composition out of its idiosyncrasies, in the "complete collection
of genteel and ingenious conversation according to the most polite
mode and method now used at Court, and in the best companies
of England, in three dialogues," usually known by the short title
of "Polite Conversations." These dialogues are pretended to be
the satirist's epitome of the smart sayings he has noted down
in his large table-book during a long period of years, put Into
the mouths of a small party of smart people spending a day
together, and, although written with the tongue far into the cheek,
they betray an unmistakable air of being as near an impression
of the truth of things as it is possible for any sort of fiction to
be. Swift is of course ridiculing the use of set phrases by rote,
clichis, as substitutes for original conversation, and there is a
strange familiarity about much of the repartee which, if he may
be taken seriously for once, was all at least a hundred years old in
his day. He claims that he has passed perhaps more time than any
other man of his age and country in visits and assemblies, where
the polite persons of both sexes distinguish themselves, and that he
could not without much grief observe how frequently both gentlemen
and ladies were at a loss for questions, answers, replies, and rejoinder ;
that the conversation at Court, at public visiting days, and other
places of general meeting, was often seen to fall and drop to nothing,
like a fire without supply of fuel. Accordingly he devoted himself
to classifying, all the ingenious remarks he heard, and arranging
them in the form of dialogues that might be an example for all
to learn from.
The argument of the dialogues, which outlines the whole of
a fashionable day's occupation, is as follows: — Lord Sparkish and
Colonel Atwit meet in the morning upon the Mall; Mr. Neverdut

1 6 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
joins them ; they all go to breakfast at Lady Smart's. Their
conversation over their tea, after which they part, but my Lord
and the two gentlemen are invited to dinner. Sir John Linger (a
Derbyshire squire) is likewise invited, but comes late. The whole
conversation at dinner, after which the ladies retire to their tea.
The conversation of the ladies without the men, who are supposed
to stay and drink a bottle ; but In some time go to the ladies and
drink tea with them. The conversation there. After which a party
at quadrille, until three in the morning ; but no conversation set down.
They all take leave and go home.
As for there being no conversation set down at cards, Swift con
fesses his disappointment that so universal and polite an entertainment
had contributed so little to the enlargement of his work, as he had
sat many hundred times with the utmost vigilance, and his table-
book ready, without being able, In eight hours, to gather matter for '
so much as one single phrase. But to make up for this he has con
centrated on the pert Miss Notable — evidently a very young and
distracting lady — and Mr. Neverout, who seem to have kept the
company fairly alive with their sparkling repartee, a great part of
which might almost be overheard nowadays In suburban villas or in
a Bank Holiday excursion train. Neverout asks her to fill him a
dish of tea, and she asks if he will have it now or stay till he gets
it. A second time he asks : —
Miss. Pray, let your betters be served before you ; I'm just going
to fill one for myself: and you know the parson always christens his
own child first.
Nev. But I saw you fill one just now for the Colonel. Well, I
find kissing goes by favour. :
Miss. Pray, Mr. Neverout, what lady was that you were talking
with in the side box last Tuesday .?
Nev. Miss — Can you keep a secret .?
Miss. Yes. I can.
Nev. Well, Miss — and so can I !
The Colonel and Lord Sparkish, too, have some pretty passages.

THE .AUGUSTAN .AGE ij
Col. But, my Lord, I forgot to ask you how you like my new
clothes. Lord S. Why, very well. Colonel ; only, to deal plainly with you,
methinks the worst piece is in the middle. {Here a loud laugh, oft
repeated.) Pray, is Miss Buxom married? I hear 'tis all over the
town. Col. If she be'nt married, at least she's lustily promised. But is
it certain that Sir John Blunderbuss is dead at last?
Lord S. Yes, or else he's sadly wronged, for they have burled him.
Nev. Pray, Miss, why do you sigh?
Miss. To make a fool ask, and you are the first.
Nev. Well. I see one fool makes many.
Miss. And you are the greatest fool of any.
The Colonel spills his tea, and his hostess cheers him with the
remark that it is as well done as if she had done it herself. But it
is useless to quote any more — it is all quotation, and the whole day's
entertainment makes a very good afternoon's reading.
These " Polite Conversations " were not published till some years
after the close of the period we are now considering, though perhaps
we may take their author's word seriously enough to believe that he
had been collecting material for them for many years past. But there
is another satirical picture of Society at the close of George I.'s reign
— shortly after the execution of Jonathan Wild — that took such an
extraordinary hold on the public of all classes, and so influenced the
art and literature of the succeeding decade or so, that, In spite of its
subject being one of low life, it forms an important link between
this chapter and the next — I mean "The Beggar's Opera." As this has
not been performed now for nearly half a century, and as the present
age is so taken up with what it is pleased to call " musical farce,"
it is perhaps worth calling to mind the outlines of this famous piece,
that so roused the public interest in the humours of the criminal
classes as exploited for satirical purposes.
Peachum is the thieves' lawyer, and his daughter Polly furnishes
the first development of the plot by letting out that she is married to
Captain Macheath, the highwayman. Peachum questions her, and con-

1 8 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
eludes by speaking his mind very plainly : " You know, Polly, I'm not
against your toying and trifling with a customer in the way of business,
or to get out a secret or so. But if I find out that you have play'd
the fool and are married, you jade you, I'll cut your throat, hussy.
Now you know my mind." Mrs. Peachum then bursts in — or out —
"In a very great passion," with the following, set to the tune of
" O London is a fine Town."
" Our Polly is a sad slut ! nor heeds what we have taught her ;
I wonder any man alive will ever rear a daughter ! " &c.
"I knew she was always a proud slut," she continues, "and now
the wench hath played the fool and married, because forsooth
she would do like the gentry. Can you support the expence of a
husband, hussy, in drinking and gaming ? Have you money enough
to carry on the daily quarrels of man and wife about who shall
squander most? If you must be married, could you introduce
nobody into our family but a highwayman? Why, thou foolish
jade, thou wilt be as ill used and as much neglected as if thou hadst
married a Lord ! " Peachum comes to the rescue with some very
sage reflections. " Let not your anger, my dear, break through the
rules of decency, for the Captain looks upon himself in the military
capacity as a gentleman by profession. Besides what he hath already,
I know he is in a fair way of getting [making money] or of dying ;
and both these ways, let me tell you, are most excellent chances for
a wife." Mrs. Peachum, however, is not so easily consoled. " With
Polly's fortune," she says, " she might well have gone off to a person
of distinction. Yes, that you might, you pouting slut ! . . . All
the hopes of the family are gone for ever and ever 1 " Polly, after
a short ditty to the tune of "Grim King of the Ghosts," patheti
cally remarks, "I did not marry him (as 'tis the fashion) coolly and
deliberately for honour or money. But, I love him." " Love him ! "
screams her mother, " worse and worse 1 I thought the girl had been
better bred. Oh husband, husband ! her folly makes me mad ! My
head swims ! I'm distracted I I can't support myself . . . Oh ! "
{Faints.) The act closes with a charming love scene between Mac-
heath and Polly, In which one of the ditties is, "Over the Hills

THE .AUGUSTAN .AGE 19
and far away," while another contains this simple yet captivating
couplet : "Folly. Fondly let me loll.
Macheath. O pretty, pretty Poll."
Several of these old tunes survived — and possibly still survive in
old-fashioned houses — in "The Lancers"; as, for instance, "If the
heart of a man is deprest by care," which was the regular music for
the " Ladies in the middle " figure.
In the next act, Macheath Is " lagged," and the unfortunate Lucy
Lockit, the jailor's daughter, comes on the scene, with reproaches for
Macheath's perfidy. Polly afterwards joins them, giving occasion to
Macheath's ever remembered —
" How happy could I be with either
Were t' other dear charmer away !
But while you thus teaze me together,
To neither a word will I say.
But loi de roi," &c.,
which is shortly followed by Polly's " Cease your funning."
In the third act the plot thickens, as it should, and ditties to
the tunes of " Happy Groves," " Of all the girls that are so smart/'
"Britons, strike home," "Chevy Chase," "Joy to great Cassar,"
" Green Sleeves," and the like, follow in dazzling succession, till the
curtain is rung down on "Lumps of Pudding." A chorus, consisting
of a Beggar and a Player, then enter, and explain that poetical Justice
must be done to make the piece perfect — " Macheath is to be hanged ;
and for the other personages of the drama, the audience must have
supposed they were all either hanged or transported." But this was
so fatal an objection that a general reprieve was ordered, and the
conclusion of the whole matter was resolved thus by the Beggar —
"Through the whole piece you may observe such a similitude of manners
in high and low life that it is difficult to determine whether (in the
fashionable vices) the fine gentlemen imitate the gentlemen of the road ,
or the gentlemen of the road the fine gentlemen. Had the play re
mained as at first intended, it would have carried a most excellent moral.
'Twould have shown that the lower sort of people have their vices in
a degree as well as the rich, and that they are punished for them."
In the next chapter we shall see how this theme was worked out.

CHAPTER II
HOGARTH AND HIS TIMES
The extraordinary success of "The Beggar's Opera" seems almost, as
I have already hinted, to have been the determining factor in the
development of both art and literature during the next quarter of
the century, a period that has somehow acquired the air of belonging
almost exclusively to those two very brilliant but decidedly rough
diamonds, Hogarth and Fielding. To pass from the age of The
Spectator to the age of Reynolds Is something like crossing the
servants' quarters on one's way from the study to the drawing-room,
and for the high-minded and fastidious the babble of loud and
rather coarse voices is too much, and the general atmosphere too
strong, to permit them to stay and make any acquaintance with the
company whose quality and manners, it must be admitted, are hardly
those of Sir Roger or Lord Chesterfield. That the passing-away of
Addison and Steele — or, for the matter of that, the execution of
Jonathan Wild — had any cataclysmal effect on the general tone of
society, or that even its outward appearances underwent any con
siderable change at this particular time, need hardly be supposed;
it is merely that the individuality of Hogarth and Fielding was
strong enough to dominate their period, and their brilliance to eclipse
the lesser lights, just as the gentler spirits of Addison, Steele, and
Pope illuminated the preceding period with a glow that even a fire
brand like Swift rarely outshone.
What Hogarth's career would have been but for his early success
with "The Harlot's Progress," it is, of course, impossible to say;
but, as it happened, that was the great turning point, and, before
he was old or experienced enough to decide for himself whether he
should remain an engraver of popular prints, or a painter of people's
likenesses, decided for him that he was to be both, and a great deal

HOGARTH .AND HIS TIMES 21
more besides. The success of " The Harlot's Progress " was pheno
menal. The familiarity of the subject (as Nichols observes), and the
propriety of its execution made it tasted by all ranks of people, so
that above twelve hundred names were entered in the subscription
book. Cibber made a pantomime out of it, and somebody else a
ballad opera, under the attractive title of "The Jew Decoyed." Its
general popularity was increased by the fact, related by Nichols,
that at a Board of Treasury held a day or two after the appearance
of the third print, a copy of it was shown to one of the Lords as
containing, among other excellences, a striking likeness of Sir John
Gonson, the incomparable and learned magistrate who was so zealous
and so eloquent in the suppression of this sort of iniquity. This
gave universal satisfaction, and each Lord repaired from the Treasury
to the print shop for a copy of it, and Hogarth rose completely
into fame. Henceforth he was to be public moralist, an occupation
which, if it did not dignify his art, ensured him at all events a
great deal more attention than he would have ever attracted as a
mere painter, whether of portraits or of subjects.
Whether we look at Hogarth as the founder of a school of
painting, . or, in connection with the subject in hand, as simply a
painter of contemporary Society, it is impossible not to admire his
extraordinary independence and originality It is amusing enough
to know that he was the inventor of the thumb-nail sketch, as is
certified by Nichols on the information of a friend of his, who
actually saw Hogarth, "being once with our painter at the Bedford
Coffee House, draw something with a pencil on his nail. On
inquiring what had been his employment, he was shown the coun
tenance (a whimsical one) of a person who was there at a small
distance." But what Is really worth considering is that, without
any English precedents to work upon, he should have produced
such surprisingly successful pictures of groups of figures engaged
in action or conversation, while even more extraordinary is his
brilliant idea of painting not one but a whole series of pictures,
giving his characters life as only the theatre had done before him.
Hogarth was always striking out on new tracks, and doing things
that no one had done before. Even in his personal relations

22 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
with uncongenial sitters he anticipated the moderns, and the follow
ing epistle has hardly been surpassed by any professor of the
"gentle art."
" Mr. Hogarth's dutiful respects to Lord  ; finding that he
does not mean to have the picture which was drawn for him, is
informed again of Mr. H.'s necessity for the money ; if, therefore, his
lordship does not send for the picture in three days it will be disposed
of, with the addition of a tail, and some other little appendages, to
Mr. Hare, the famous wild beast man ; Mr. H. having given that
gentleman a conditional promise of it for an exhibition picture, on
his Lordship's refusal."
Hogarth was of course a realist, and it Is fortunate that his reputa
tion was established before he attempted Sigismunda. Had he begun
with Sigismunda, and found a few noble noodles to crack him up as
a classical painter, no one can tell how lamentable the result would
have been. At any rate we should have lost the Hogarth we have
now, and we can hardly be too thankful that Kate Hackabout and
Mother Needham occupied so prominent a place in the public eye
as to ensure for our blunt Englishman the recognition which in
a more artificial age would have been denied him.
Of his sermons and satires, however, it Is hardly necessary to say
any more on this occasion, and we may turn at once to consider a
minor and less familiar branch of his art, but one that is of special
Interest in relation to the society of his time, namely, the painting
of "conversation pieces," as they were generally called. Instead of
painting single portraits of different members of a family, he developed,
if he did not originate, the fashion for depicting whole families not
merely sitting in groups, but engaged in some natural occupation or
" conversation " ; and besides Hogarth there is only one artist who has
left us any considerable quantity of them, namely Zoffany. Hogarth,
in fact, was an observer of Society rather than of individuals, and his
forte was in dealing with humanity in everyday expressions of itself
rather than In penetrating the characteristics of any single member of it
as a unit. To Hogarth men and women were merely atoms in a
universe, and their relation one to another concerned him far more
than to attempt the dissection of any particular atom. To Hogarth

HOGARTH .AND HIS TIMES 23
the canvas was a stage on which men and women must speak and act,
and not sit mute and motionless. To him a picture was the means of
expressing some phase of life, not the mere rendering in paint of the
likeness of a man ; and even In a single portrait, like that of John
Broughton, his independence and originality carry him far away from
his contemporaries. Here is a full-length portrait, but instead of Mr.
Broughton being posed, in his best get-up, against a pillar, he is boldly
taken walking at you, in undress, his stick raised in one hand, his hat
in the other, notwithstanding he has no wig to cover his bare head. It
is quite Impudent, and quite successful. That Hogarth could equal
his contemporaries in a more conventional portrait — it is hardly fair to
compare his work with that of his more accomplished successors — Is
quite clear from such a picture as that of Lord Lovat, which as a
soliloquy, on a bare stage without any setting, is as eloquent as any
scene in his " Progresses." There sits the old fox !
It is not every one, however, who has as much In his face as old
Simon Fraser, and there is no doubt that a family group of ordinary
people is a more satisfactory way of expressing the life, if it can be
decently done, than a series of single portraits. The thing is so
obvious that it hardly needs talking about ; but yet when we come to
look at the attempts that are occasionally made nowadays, what use do
we find made of it ? With the exception of Mr, Sargent, there is
hardly a painter of modern times who can put half as much life and
expression into a group of figures as may be seen in any of Hogarth's.
The family are all in their best clothes, and look thoroughly strained
and uncomfortable. They are seldom doing anything, except sitting
for their portraits, and on the whole the photographer can produce just
as good a result with a camera and a few persuasive words to each of
his sitters in turn. This was not Hogarth's way. If he had a family
to paint, he made them for the time being his own : he ordered them
about, or, if he didn't, he knew exactly how to get them into their
proper relations with one another without orders : If it was not
composition, it was at least arrangement, and when it was not that, it
was simply genius.
Take, for Instance, the picture of the Strode Family, which is now at
the National Gallery, which Nichols calls a " Breakfast Piece." Here,

24 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
on a small canvas, are portraits of William Strode, of Northaw in
Hertfordshire; his mother. Lady Anne, who was sister to Lord
Salisbury, Colonel Strode, and Dr. Arthur Smith, afterwards Arch
bishop of Dublin. There are also two dogs, one of which, says
Nichols, was Mr. Strode's, and. the other (a pug) the Colonel's.
Another group is that of the Woollaston Family, painted in 1730,
which was lately exhibited by Messrs. D. & P. Colnaghi, but without
their being at liberty to Inform me whom it belonged to. Here there
are two tables in a large room, one for tea and another for cards,
and at each are grouped four or five figures, while the principal
gentleman is standing talking between the two.
But even more successful than these, and, as any of my readers
who may recall the Exhibition of National Portraits in 1867 will
probably agree, considerably more charming, is the picture of the
Western family of Rivenhall, which Hogarth probably painted in
1735. I" this, too, the scene is an interior, and the principal piece
of furniture a tea-table — or it may be a " breakfast " table, slightly
to one side. In the centre is Mr. Western, a tall big man, who
has evidently just entered the room and is standing, with a lady on
his right side, holding in his left hand a dead partridge. Behind
the tea-table is standing another lady, of very sparkling mien, who
with a lively gesture plucks the gown of the chaplain, Mr. Hartell
(who is sitting to her left talking to a man-servant), to call his
attention to the bird, leaving the tea-things (and this is the prettiest
touch) to the attention of a little wee girl, who is standing nearest
to us, in front of the table, and is just tall enough to be peeping
over the edge of it.^ After this, the picture of Sir Andrew Foun-
taine and his family seems a little flat, though it can hardly be
considered inferior. The scene is a garden, and the motive is the
display of a picture, which is held upright by Cocks the auctioneer,
while it is examined closely by Sir Andrew and another man, two
seated ladies regarding it from a distance. A smaller group, and
one which compares in treatment with that of " Hogarth's Servants "
at the National Gallery, is the four figures, of three-quarter-length,
' Nichols describes another group of the Western family which includes Hoadly and
others.

Gustavus Viscount Boyne. Fiom ihe painling by Hogarth. Viseount Boyne.

The Duke of Montagu's Wedding. From the painling by Marcellus Laroon

HOGARTH .AND HIS TIMES 25
of the Misses Weston, of Stallbridge in Dorsetshire. Here the effect
is obtained by the characterisation of the faces of the four girls,
there being little opportunity of grouping, and Hogarth shows him
self equally capable. The faces are full of life, and considerably
more character than is often seen in the faces of a group of sisters.
As a picture, however, by far the most vivid and impressive is
the extraordinary portrait of Lord Boyne in the cabin of his yacht.
It is thoroughly characteristic of Hogarth that he should paint a
Peer as no one before or since has ever done ; that he should spurn
the idea of coronet or robes, or of any state and pomp, and present
his Lordship seated in a cabin, in undress, his hands resting on a
stick, one leg crossed over the other, and his bare feet in slippers.
Instead of making his maiden speech in the House, or driving Envy
and Fraud from the councils of the nation, or doing any other of
those things actual or allegorical which Peers are so fond of being
found doing. Lord Boyne is paying the most natural attention to the
skipper, who is showing him a chart ; and we have here, for once,
a portrait in which we may learn something of the subject from the
actual surroundings in which the painter saw him. The picture is
skilfully composed ; the cabin is somewhat dark, but the light,
striking from our left, catches the broad sheets of the chart, which
is in the centre, and enough of the terrestrial globe across the room
on our right to relieve a dark corner. A large round table occupies
the centre of the cabin. Lord Boyne being seated in front of it, and
the skipper reaching across it from behind, and there is room on it
for a good-sized punchbowl (besides the charts), from which one of
the two standing figures on our left has taken a cupful. Behind
the skipper, on our right, is a fifth figure, with a short stick, which
is said to be a likeness of the artist. Under the table is seen a very
Hogarthian cat.
But Hogarth must not be allowed to monopolise this chapter.
He has had ample justice done him of late, both by Sir Walter
Armstrong and Mr. Austin Dobson, and there are some of his con
temporaries who are well worth becoming acquainted with, even if
their voices are not so loud, nor their talents so dominating. Much
as we admire Mr. Hogarth and his outspoken exposition of the

26 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
morals of his time, we should like to know a little more of its
manners ; and though we esteem him as the salt of the earth — that
portion of it in particular which men were getting prouder and
prouder of calling England — there is no reason why we should not
be looking about for a little of the sugar. What we want is to
make friends with a few of his contemporaries, brother artists, who
will convince us in their own way that there Is still something
worth discovering in the work of this period besides Hogarth's, and
that the population of these islands in his time (outside the charm
ing family circles he depicted) was not entirely composed of thieves
and blackguards.
Certainly there are others besides Hogarth, whose known work
though not perhaps of first-rate importance Is charming enough to
make us hope that sooner or later a great deal more of it may be
brought to light from the odd corners of old country houses, and
may show us that there is really something worth staying to look
at in the way of pictures in the passage from the Augustan age to
Sir Joshua and his circle. To begin with, there is Sir Joshua's
master, Hudson, though there is no need to say very much of his
v/ork on the present occasion, as his occupation was chiefly that of
the conventional portrait painter, to whom people sat as a matter of
course without feeling any of the thrill of being made a picture of
by a great artist. He was the son-in-law of Jonathan Richardson,
and successor to him and the fatuous Jervas as the fashionable
portrait painter of his time, and I think I am right in saying that he
did little besides single portraits. Vanloo, as Walpole observes, and
Llotard, for a few years diverted the torrent of fashion from the
established professor, but the county gentlemen were faithful to their
compatriot, and were content with his honest similitudes and with
the fair tied wigs, blue velvet coats, and white satin waistcoats, which
he liberally bestowed on his customers, and which with complaisance
they beheld multiplied in Faber's mezzotintos. The better taste
Introduced by Sir Joshua Reynolds (Walpole continues) put an end
to Hudson's reign, who had the good sense to resign the throne
soon after finishing his capital work, the family piece of Charies,
Duke of Marlborough.

r"--  ¦" > ¦

¦^ ¦' >.*

^...^.^.^^ .__.^,. ^ .

>\ ;¦" '¦" ,"""..-<^' ";^;7'"

.; . -1-5V,

* 4 *f*r

^'-¦* 'v *

- ¦¦ . / ",, ¦' :¦¦

- ?'"^ .:¦';"•'

V ¦

~~..,-

^¦^- ^

..^ ..:¦  >,l, .,-. .-._"¦

^¦.¦--,¥r':

. '-^
. -.-'-- . ^
^^  it
'¦'•K- ' .
1^
"¦'c^''
" . •^;. ¦ :
^^*%
1
/ -" ^
;
.xh> ^y ^ , •*
z~-yi^ ' ¦¦ ' ''-""'
1?
NX- 3 i
1
^i
,y:jj... ; -~""\'^. ,-
-. -^V^ •¦ • , ' V'."'- .¦ / ¦ . 1 ¦
. ^-<^\^^
i-...
' ¦ i- ' 1
The Enraged Husband. From a drawing by Joseph Highmore. British Museum.
HOGARTH .AND HIS TIMES 27
Joseph Highmore, who was bred for a lawyer, but studied paint
ing with some success, is a more promising subject, as he is said to
have devoted himself particularly to family groups. Unfortunately
his works are so little known that I am unable to lay hands on any
example of a painting of this sort which is accessible for reproduction
in this volume; but the single drawing which the British Museum
contains of his, goes some way to atone for the deficiency. This
drawing, "The Enraged Husband," as it is called, is the slightest
of pencil sketches, but it shows such force and such delicacy alike
that one hardly regrets that it was carried no further. There is
enough in its few strokes to convey with the most charming ease
and certainty not only the nature of the scene at which we are
onlookers, but the characters who are enacting it ; and the artist
seems to have accomplished quite as much with his delicate pencil
point as Hogarth with his bludgeon. One feels that the shape and
hang of the lady's hoop and her easy contemptuous attitude as she
feels in her purse, have quite as much to do with her lord's exaspera
tion as the state of the clock at which he is pointing, while the
yawning maids and the huddling footmen, dimly outlined as they are,
are far more useful in completing the effect than any of Hogarth's
inanimate symbols and labels that he filled up his backgrounds with.
Besides family pieces, however, Highmore Is known to have
painted a series of pictures illustrating scenes from " Pamela," which
were engraved by L. Truchy and A. Benoist, and published on the
1st July 1745. What has become of the pictures I have no idea,
but the engravings, of which two are here reproduced, are enough
to show that it would be well worth anybody's while to find them.
It is so easy to believe that things are lost or destroyed merely
because nobody one asks happens to know where they are, that I
have the greatest hopes that this charming series is somewhere under
our noses all the time, perhaps in the safe keeping of some trusty
custodians whose last care about the treasures they are put to guard
is that the public should see them. The Chardin pictures at Glasgow,
for instance, which were shown at Whitechapel last Spring, were
so entirely unknown, that I was fortunate enough to pick up an
unnamed mezzotint of the largest of them for no more than three

2 8 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
francs In Paris the other day. The Soane Museum is open occasion
ally, and is sometimes visited by people from a distance who happen
to strike the particular month, day, and hour of its being open.
Pending their discovery, however, it is only fair to Highmore to
reproduce a couple of the series in a work of this sort, and to quote
the descriptions of them which are probably from his pen: —
" Pamela on her knees before her father, whom she had discovered
behind the door, having overturned the card-table in her way. Sir
Simon Darnford, his lady, &c., observing her with eagerness and
admiration. Mr. B., struck with this scene, is waiting the issue.
" Pamela with her children and Miss Goodwin, to whom she is telling
her nursery tales. This last piece leaves her in full possession of the
peaceable fruits of her virtue long after having surmounted all the
difficulties it has been exposed to."
No less interesting is the work of Francis Hayman, of which a
good deal was engraved by Grignon and others. In his pictures,
says Walpole, his colouring was raw, nor in any light did he attain
excellence. But that his work was distinguishable by the large noses
and shambling legs of his figures is a criticism for which Walpole
may well be called to task, if Hayman is to be judged by the
engravings after his Vauxhall pictures and his illustrations to Pope,
Milton, and other editions of his period. These Vauxhall pictures,
which were engraved by Grignon, Parr, Truchy, and others, and
published in 1743, are a most charming and lively series, and afford
us a very amusing view of the diversions of the homely classes at
that time. These include Battledore and Shittlecock, Leapfrog,
See-Saw, Stealing a Kiss, Quadrille (not the dance but a game of
cards). The Fortune-Teller, Blind Man's Buff, and Building Houses
with Cards ; and in most of them the personages are all graceful and
attractive, especially the children in their quaint habits, while the
grouping is admirable.
Another of these Vauxhall pictures was the allegorical piece In
commemoration of Hawke's victory in Quiberon Bay, in which a
diversity of nymphs are swimming round a chariot, each holding

Illusiration to "Pamela." F

rom an en

'graving by Benoist afler the painling by Joseph Highmore.

Illustration to "Pamela." Fn

¦om an engraving by L. Tiuchy after the painting by Joseph Highmore.

HOGARTH .AND HIS TIMES 29
a medallion bearing the portrait of an Admiral. The nymphs are
amusingly Hogarthian in feature, though in costume they are of
an earlier epoch — that of Eve — and the naval heroes' countenances
on the medallion make an effective contrast. It was this picture
that occasioned the scene In "Evelina," where (at a later date than
we are now speaking of) Mr. Smith, an art critic of a type that is
by no means extinct in these present days, was so beautifully
" smoked." Evelina relates how, to escape the Importunities of Sir
Clement, she turns towards one of the paintings, and, pretending to
be very much occupied in looking at it, asks M. des Bois some
questions concerning the figures.
" O ! Mon Dieu ! " cried Madame Duval, " don't ask him ; your
best way is to ask Mr. Smith, for he's been here the oftenest.
Come, Mr. Smith, I daresay you can tell us all about them."
" Why, yes, Ma'am, yes 1 " said Mr. Smith, who, brightening up
at the application, advanced toward us with an air of assumed
importance, which, however, sat very uneasily upon him, and begged
to know what he should explain first: "for I have attended," said
he, "to all these paintings, and know everything in them perfectly
well, for I am rather fond of pictures. Ma'am ; and really I must
say, I think a pretty picture is a — a very — is really a very — is
something very pretty  "
"So do I too," said Madame Duval; "but pray now. Sir, tell
us who that is meant for," pointing to a figure of Neptune.
" That 1 Why, that, Ma'am, is — Lord bless me, I can't think
how I come to be so stupid, but really I have forgot his name ; —
and yet — I know it as well as my own too ; — however he's a General,
Ma'am, they are all Generals."
I saw Sir Clement bite his lip ; and, indeed, so did I mine.
" Well," said Madame Duval, " it's the oddest dress for a General
ever I see ! "
" He seems so capital a figure," said Sir Clement to Mr. Smith,
" that I'm sure he must be the Generalissimo of the whole army."
"Yes, sir, yes," answered Mr. Smith, respectfully bowing, and
highly delighted at being thus referred to, " you are perfectly right ;

30 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
— but I cannot for my life think of his name ; — perhaps. Sir, you
may remember it ? "
" No, really," replied Sir Clement, " my acquaintance among the
generals Is not so extensive."
For over two centuries Vauxhall was London's most popular
place of recreation, and its history from the time it was visited by
Pepys, until in 1869 it made way for the Railway Station where
tickets are taken, would fill a very large volume. In Mr. Wroth's
recent book on " The Pleasure Gardens of London," there is only
room for one short chapter upon it, so numerous were the gardens
and wells all round London, whose names only now survive in some
cases, while others are completely .forgotten. Hockley-in-the-Hole
and Baggnigge Wells were places of great resort, but how many
inhabitants of London to-day could place them on the map ? — while
Islington and Marylebone have grown into such important parts of
the metropolis that the idea of Pleasure Gardens has fled far from
them. The last survival of this sort of place was Cremorne, which,
after a chequered, though on the whole successful career of about
half a century, was finally closed in 1875.
It was in 1742 that Vauxhall at last had a serious rival — Lord
Ranelagh's grounds adjoining the Royal Hospital being turned into
a place of public amusement. "Two nights ago," writes Walpole
on the 26th May, "Ranelagh Gardens were opened at Chelsea; the
Prince, Princess, Duke, and much nobility, and much mob besides,
were there. There is a vast amphitheatre [better known as the
Rotunda] finely gilt, painted, and illuminated, into which everybody
that loves eating, drinking, staring, or crowding, is admitted for
twelvepence. The building and disposition of the gardens cost sixteen
thousand pounds. Twice a week there are to be rid ottos, at guinea-
tickets, for which you are to have a supper and music. I was there
last night [he adds] but did not find the joy of it. Vauxhall is a little
better ; for the garden is pleasanter and one goes by water."
Ranelagh, indeed, was a less joyous place than Vauxhall, even
if it was occasionally more fashionable. Its chief attraction was the
Rotunda, which gave it a more formal character than that of the

I

^
^

1^

HOGARTH .AND HIS TIMES 31
secluded alleys and al fresco suppers of Vauxhall. At Ranelagh there
was only tea and bread and butter, and the chief amusement, such
as it was, was to promenade round and round the Rotunda. But
there were great occasions, and perhaps the greatest of these was
the Venetian F6te in 1749, an illustration of which is in existence.
This print, which bears the name of Boitard, a spirited artist and
engraver who contributed not a few examples of contemporary manners
that are catalogued among the "Satirical Prints," is accompanied
by a good deal of letterpress that is hardly In keeping with Boitard's
representation of what was undoubtedly a most brilliant and successful
entertainment. It is possible that those interested in Vauxhall may
have had something to do with its publication, and intended to
discredit these foreign innovations by pretending to be shocked at
the Royal sanction being given to so frivolous an undertaking. If
so, they should have chosen a less sympathetic draughtsman than
Boitard, who has certainly been carried along by the lively crowd
he depicts. With their poet they were more fortunate, for the
satirical title, " By the King's Command," is followed by a dozen
couplets or so that might have been written by a disappointed non
conformist who had not only had his pocket picked, but also lost
his umbrella : — " England, most fond of foreign follies grown.
Each new device adopts and makes her own :
France cannot fast enough supply the call,
From Venice they import the Fresco ball.
Where nymphs in loose and antick robes appear.
And motley shapes our warlike heroes wear." —
And SO forth. But the entertainment was so successful that another
was given on the 24th May 175 1, being the Prince of Wales' birth
day, and this was depicted by Canaletto.
It was in 1749, as it happens, that London was first honoured
by the attentions of Antonio Canaletto, " the perspective painter of
Venice," as Vertue calls him In noting his arrival at this date.
Vauxhall, as will be seen from our illustration, was likewise honoured,
and Vertue makes the following interesting note about another of
his London subjects : —
"It may be supposed that, his shyness of showing his works

32 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
doing or done he has been told of, and therefore probably he put
this advertisement in the public newspaper : — Signor Canaletto hereby
invites any gentlemen that will be pleased to come to his house
to see a picture done by him, being a view of St. James' Park,
which he hopes may in some measure deserve their approbation,
any morning or afternoon at his lodgings [at] Mr Wiggan, cabinet
maker in Silver street. Golden square."
Boitard's print of the Venetian Masquerade is the more interesting
Inasmuch as the event which it depicts is minutely described by
Walpole, who gives a very different view of it from that of the
publishers of the print. Peace had been proclaimed on the 25th
April 1749, "and on the next day," Walpole writes, "was what was
called a Jubilee Masquerade in the Venetian manner, at Ranelagh ;
it had nothing Venetian in it, but was by far the best understood and
prettiest spectacle I ever saw ; nothing in a fairy tale even surpassed
it. One of the proprietors, who is a German, and belongs to the
Court, had got my Lady Yarmouth to persuade the King to order
it. It began at three o'clock, and about five people of fashion
began to go. When you entered you found the whole garden filled
with masks and spread with tents, which remained all night very
commodely. In one quarter was a Maypole dressed with garlands and
people dancing round it to a tabor and pipe and rustic music, all
masqued, as were all the various bands of music that were disposed
in different parts of the garden ; some like huntsmen with French
horns, some like peasants, and a troop of harlequins and scaramouches
in the little open temple on the mount. On the Canal was a sort
of gondola adorned with flags and streamers, and filled with music,
rowing about. All round the outside of the amphitheatre were shops
filled with Dresden china, Japan, &c., and, all the shopkeepers in mask.
The amphitheatre was illuminated, and in the middle was a circular
bower, composed of all kinds of firs in tubs, from twenty to thirty
feet high : under them orange trees with small lamps in each orange,
and below them all sorts of the finest auriculas in pots ; and festoons
of natural flowers hanging from tree to tree. . . . There were booths
for tea and wine, gaming tables and dancing, and about two thousand
persons. In short It pleased me more than anything I ever saw."

Taste a La >ronE, 1745 From an ene'ravinr; after Boitard.

Masquerade at Ranelagh G.-vkdens, April 26, 1749. From nn engraving after Boitard.

HOGARTH .AND HIS TIMES 33
Of the private Court life under George II. an amusing if grim
sketch is given in a letter of Lord Hervey's to Lady Sundon, which
is quoted by Thackeray in "The Four Georges." "I will not trouble
you," he writes, " with any account of our occupations at Hampton
Court. No mill-horse ever went in a more constant track, or a
more unchanging circle ; so that by the assistance of an almanack
for the day of the week, and a watch for the hour of the day, you
may inform yourself fully, without any other intelligence but your
memory, of every transaction within the verge of the Court.
Walking, chaises, levees, and audiences fill the morning. At night
the King plays at commerce and backgammon, and the Queen at
quadrille, where poor Lady Charlotte runs her usual nightly gauntlet,
the Queen pulling her hood, and the Princess Royal rapping her
knuckles. The Duke of Grafton takes his nightly opiate of lottery,
and sleeps as usual between the Princess Amelia and Caroline. Lord
Grantham strolls from one room to another (as Dryden says) like
some discontented ghost that oft appears, and is forbid to speak,
and stirs himself about as people stir a fire, not with any design,
but in hopes to make it burn brisker. At last the King gets up ;
the pool finishes ; and everybody has their dismission. Their
Majesties retire to Lady Charlotte and my Lord Lifford ; my Lord
Grantham to Lady Frances and Mr. Clark ; some to supper, some
to bed ; and thus the evening and the morning make the day."
Besides the three English artists, Hogarth, Highmore, and
Hayman, to whom we are indebted for so much of our knowledge
of what people looked like and what they did, there are several
foreigners who have also contributed a great deal that is worth
thanking them for, and whose names will perhaps be better known
when this particular period in the history of the English school of
painting comes to be a more fashionable study than It is at the present
moment, when the examples which are here reproduced are practi
cally all that are procurable. Boitard we have already mentioned
in connection with Ranelagh, and he has given us lively pictures of
the men and women of his time in a couple of prints called "Taste
i la Mode," in 1735 ^"^ ^745 '¦> ^^^ ^^ ^^^ rather a broad-sheet
satirist than anything more considerable. Of the painters, Marcellus

34 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
Laroon the younger may first be mentioned, and he should perhaps
be included among the Englishmen, being born and bred in England,
though of course of foreign extraction. He was the son of " Old
Laroon " mentioned In my first chapter, and was born near London
in 1679. He began life as an actor, and he also served as a soldier,
and obtained a commission, whence he is known as Captain Laroon.
What has become of all his work It is impossible to say, but there
is doubtless a good deal of it somewhere if it could only be found.
A couple of drawings at the British Museum, and one or two in
private collections are all that I have ever seen of it myself, besides
the two pictures at Kensington Palace, and I have searched in vain
for the present whereabouts of the larger picture of the " Duke of
Montagu's Wedding," which is here reproduced. That an artist
who could paint pictures like these should be so entirely forgotten
seems almost impossible, not that they are in any sense masterpieces,
but they show that Laroon was not only entrusted with important
work of this sort, but was very capable of executing it.
So far as I can ascertain, there is no history of the last-named
picture beyond what was stated about it In the Catalogue of
National Portraits, to the effect that it depicted the marriage of
Lord Cardigan and Lady Mary Montagu, and that the bride and
bridegroom are the figures talking to the parson near the door.
This of itself would date the picture as having been painted
in 1730, or thereabouts, as the wedding in question took place in
July of that year. On the other hand Laroon was more or less
engaged in active service till 1734, and there is the drawing by him
reproduced opposite this page, which can hardly be dissociated from
the picture; and that is inscribed "Marcellus Laroon fecit 1736,"
while underneath it is the following : "A Concert, by Captain
Laroon. The gentleman on the left under the door is John,
Duke of Montague; the lady standing by him is his daughter
Mary, Countess of Cardigan, afterwards Duchess of Montague."
This is of course a considerably later inscription, as Cardigan was
not created Duke of Montagu till 1776, about which rime Gains
borough painted him and his Duchess, making an even more won
derfully attractive picture of the elderly lady than of many a younger

/il

¦'ftl

c.''i- .

ft

r^
•..ji?
ii
l:
¦':*';
M>
« ^'
¦ . J
i"
1 t
1^ ',
1 '
-^ "^ jt"' '"'.
1
.-¦' 'H\-j ''
.i^i*^'-
fi'"^
.«5L-''J* "»
I,
Co.NCERr at .AJon'iacu House. From a drawing by Maieiliin Laroon. Briliih Museum.
HOGARTH .AND HIS TIMES 35
beauty. In Laroon's picture are traceable three or four points that
connect it with the drawing, such as the violoncello case in the fore
ground of either, the portraits of Lady Cardigan and her father, and
the lady with the fan, who is evidently the same in both the drawing
and the picture. In both it is quite obvious that all the figures are
portraits, and that the subject is an actual scene In one or other of
the rooms in Montagu House.
There is a further point to be considered, however, and that
is the similarity of this picture and the drawing to one of the two
pictures at Kensington, which is called " Royal Assembly in Kew
Palace." This is stated in the catalogue to be dated 1 740 ; but
it is evidently another version of the wedding group, and is in fact
closer to the drawing than the picture last described. There are
variations, to be sure, but not of sufficient importance to allow of
the slightest doubt that the scene is the same, and its appellation
of a Royal assembly at Kew must yield to the inscription on the
drawing. The other Kensington picture, which was formerly at
Hampton Court, was for some time attributed to Vanderbank, and
it is still catalogued as a Royal group, the person at the head of
the table being said to be the Prince of Wales. But I cannot help
thinking that here again we have something connected with the
Montagu Wedding, especially as in an old catalogue the picture has
been described as the marriage of the Duke of Wharton. Certainly
a ducal coronet is discernible on the iron gate seen through an
open window, but that either of the meteoric Wharton's two
romantic weddings (one in the Fleet, and the other at Madrid) is
here the subject is hardly possible.
Hubert Fran9ois Gravelot was another Frenchman who worked for
some time in England during the 'forties, though he is not known
to have painted any pictures. Walpole only mentions him in his
" Catalogue of Engravers," though be begins by saying that he was
not much known as an engraver, but was an excellent draughtsman.
A glance at the specimens of his work here reproduced is enough
to confirm the latter part of this statement ; and, though there is not
very much either of his drawing or engraving extant, the few examples
there are, both at the British Museum and in the National Art

36 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
Library at South Kensington, are well worth hunting up. The
Illustrations to " Pamela," of which five of the drawings are at the
British Museum, are widely different from those of Highmore, and
it is perhaps hardly fair to the latter to compare them, as Gravelot s
are finely drawn with a sharp pen on a very small scale, while
Highmore's were oil paintings, of which we only know the engravings
of Truchy, who was no great engraver, and Benoist, who, if he was
rather better, was hardly of the first order. But the comparison is
worth making if only to show what an English artist could do at
that date when virtually in competition with a Frenchman; and
though Gravelot's work must be ranked by so many degrees the
higher, that of Highmore has a greater value to us as being of our
own school, and bringing home to us the life of the time with a
sincerity that has certainly a charm of its own. Gravelot's " Ladies
and Gentlemen on a Terrace," again, with all its delicate charm, is
hardly English, and the voice of conscience tells me it is more
likely that it represents a French scene than an English one ; but
the composition is so entirely charming that I feel sure an indulgence
will be granted, and England be given the benefit of the doubt.
Another foreigner who painted portraits in England was John
Baptist Vanloo, a brother of Carl Vanloo, whose " Halte a la Chasse"
in the Louvre eclipses most of the illustrations of Society we have
in England. Even John Baptist, as Walpole observes, soon bore
away the chief business of London from every other painter, and
had his visit not been so short (173 7- 174 2) there can be no doubt
that he would have acquired a much greater fame in this country.
As it is, his work is but little known. There is a portrait of his
of Augusta, Princess of Wales, holding the young George III. by
the hand, at Buckingham Palace ; but a more charming, if less
important, specimen is the half-length of Peg Woffington in the
Jones Collection at South Kensington. Why it should now be
labelled as by an unknown artist when it was exhibited with the
National Portraits in 1867 as Vanloo, was perhaps known to Mr.
Jones, or to the Museum authorities ; but whether it be his or not,
it Is certainly an exceedingly delightful picture, and the treatment
of the hands, in particular, is far more delicate than anything

M'%r.J m-'^p- -^-1

p

HOGARTH .AND HIS TIMES 37
that might be expected from most of the English painters of the
period. What Vanloo might have done for English patrons may be
judged from what his countryman Philip Mercier did — though even
of Mercier's work, during a sojourn of over forty years In England,
it is difficult to enumerate more than a bare percentage. That
Mercier has not left a deeper mark on his time is due rather to
his own weakness than to any want of opportunity, for he came
to England under the wing of Royalty, and was never In want of
patronage. His work, however, is not of the strongest character ;
in fact its principal charm is a sort of childishness ; and, delightful
as many of his pieces are, they are not of a quality to command
the admiration that, at the same time, they are quite capable of
winning. Mercier was appointed principal painter and librarian to the
Prince and Princess of Wales at their independent establishment
in Leicester Fields, and while he was in favour he painted various
portraits of the Royalties, and no doubt many of the nobility
and gentry, which are awaiting re -discovery when the fashion
for the name of Mercier sets in. Of the Royal portraits, those of
the Prince of Wales and of his three sisters, painted in 1728, were
all engraved in mezzotint by Simon, and that of the three elder
children of the Prince of Wales by the younger Faber In 1744.
This last was a typical piece of Mercier's composition, the children
being made the subject of a spirited, if somewhat childish, allegory
in their game of play. Prince George is represented with a firelock
on his shoulder, teaching a dog his drill, while his little brother
and sister are equally occupied in a scene which Is aptly used to
point a patriotic moral embodied in some verses subjoined to the
plate, of which the concluding couplet is as follows : —
" Illustrious Isle where either sex displays
Such early omens of their future praise ! "
Faber also engraved six plates of " Rural Life " after Mercier, and
several other subjects of his have survived him, and show that
possibly he did not make the fullest use of his Royal patronage.

38 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
Be that as It may, he lost favour, and it is probable that it
was shortly after this that he left London and settled in York;
where he practised portrait painting for over ten years, before
returning to London again. In Yorkshire houses there must be
many of his portraits painted at this time. Vertue mentions that
he " had much imployments of Nobility and Gentry and substantial
persons, whose portraits he drew, being well paid for them," before
returning to London in October 1751. At Hovingham Hall, for
instance, there are three juvenile portraits, painted in 1742, of the
daughters of Thomas Worsley, in whose account -book is the
following entry on the 31st July in that year — "Paid Mr. Mercier
for three pictures, viz., of my daughters Betty, Kitty, and Nancy,
at whole length, ;£2i." Lord Malmesbury's portrait of Handel
is a very life-like and natural picture of Mercier's, said to have
been painted in or about 1748. In 1752 Vertue records that Mercier
went to Portugal at the request of several English merchants. He
did not long remain there, however, but came back to London,
where he died in 1760.
That Mercier's name should not figure in the Catalogue of our
National Gallery is hardly surprising, but it is worth mentioning,
perhaps, that one of his subject pictures has recently been acquired
for the Louvre. This is a small piece called "Le Degustateur," a
half-length of a boy seated beside a wine cask, a full glass uplifted
to the light in his right hand, and a flask in his left. In treatment,
though hardly in technique, it anticipates Chardin, and it will be
interesting to see whether Mercier's name is catalogued with the
English or the French School. Certainly the bulk of his work was
done in England, and even before his appointment to the Royal
Household, he was painting English portraits. A view of the terrace
of Shotover House, near Oxford, was recently sold out of the collection
of Dr. Briscoe of Holton Park, which contained portraits of Baron
and Lady Schutz, Dr. Tessier, Mrs. Blunt, the daughter of Sir
Timothy Tyrrell, Mrs. Bensoln, Colonel Schutz, and Count Betmere.
This was painted by Mercier in 1725. Another family group is
that at Belton, of Viscount Tyrconnel and his family in a garden,
and Mercier himself sketching them. Neither of these pictures

¦<si^

A Family

Party. From a drawing by Philip Mereicr. Britnii Museum.

HOGARTH .AND HIS TIMES 39
however, is accessible to public view, and as a painter of conversation
pieces Mercier has still to be "discovered." If time, fashion, or
accident will bring to light a few examples of the sort of picture
sketched In the accompanying drawing, we shall have reason to be
grateful to this Frenchman, if only for showing us that the fancy
portrait I ventured to draw of the Court of Queen Anne might very
possibly have been painted in fact. We have become so used to
thinking of our ancestors in terms of conventional family portraits,
that we can hardly imagine them engaging in less prosaic pursuits than
politics or war. But what is to be said of a group like this, where
a country gentleman and his party are actually depicted at a concert
in the garden ? If it is not Marlborough with a lute. It is at least
a squire, and . possibly a nobleman, with a violoncello ; and, for all
we know, this delightful party may be composed of some of the
very stiffest and starchiest of Georgian Society as we know it from
less romantic records. As a matter of fact, the notorious pompousness
of the English is not even skin deep — it goes no deeper than their
decorations, or at most than their clothes ; and as a record of what
Society actually was, a sketch of this sort is worth a hundred
ancestral portraits.

CHAPTER III
THE INFLUENCE OF REYNOLDS AND GAINSBOROUGH
The more one thinks of it the more extraordinary it seems that
out of nothing should have sprung almost at the same moment two
great painters, of such different methods, training, and surroundings;
yet whose works (besides being the most wonderful that this country
has ever produced) are In not a few instances so much alike that
it requires a skilled judgment to decide whether they are by the one
or the other. It is as though the Goddesses or Genii of East and
West had wagered as to which could produce the greater artist,
and that Suffolk and Devonshire were on their mettle. From Plympton
came the ambitious Reynolds — ambitious, I mean, to learn and practise
all that had been possible in painting, and more. From Sudbury,
the natural, easy Gainsborough, who never travelled further than
Bath, and who studied his landscapes from sticks and weeds. That
both had a natural genius for painting need hardly be said — the
Goddesses saw to that ; but while Reynolds was ceaselessly studying from
the old masters how to accomplish their excellences and to use them
in discovering fresh ones of his own, Gainsborough was simply
painting ; and, even if we must accord Reynolds the higher place,
we cannot help feeling that, of the two, Gainsborough is by far
the more lovable, and that perhaps his coolness to Reynolds is not
altogether inexplicable, if we imagine, as it is easy to do, that he
read the high-flown Presidential discourses with a little impatience
now and then. "All the indigested notions of painting which I
had brought with me from England," we may quote as an instance,
" where art was at the lowest state it had ever been in (it could
not indeed be lower), were to be totally done away with, and eradicated
from my mind." It is true that this particular passage was not
published in Gainsborough's lifetime, and that it refers to a period
40

THE INFLUENCE OF I^ETNOLDS .AND QAINSBOROUGH 41
when he was but twenty years old ; but it Is a good instance of
Reynolds' view of his own and his country's art, which was no
doubt expressed in some form or another whenever occasion allowed.
Can we not sympathise with Gainsborough, who had learnt only
from Hayman and Gravelot, and take pleasure in recalling that
there was at all events enough art In England in 1761 to elicit
the following stanzas from Roubiliac the sculptor, which were
stuck up at the Spring Gardens exhibition of English paintings in
that year. " Pr^tendu connoiseur qui sur I'antique glose
Idolatrant le nom sans connoitre la chose,
Vrai peste des beaux arts, sans godt sans Equit^,
Quitez ce ton pedant, ce m^pris affectd
Pour tout ce que le temps n'a pas encore gatd.
Ne peus-tu pas, en admirant
Les maitres de la Gr^ce et ceux de I'ltalie,
Rendre justice egalement
A ceux qu'a nourris ta Patrie ?
Vois ce Salon et tu perdras
Cette prevention in juste ;
Et, bien etonn^, conviendras
Qu'il ne faut pas qu'un Mecenas
Pour revoir le Si^cle d' Auguste."
Can we not sympathise with Gainsborough In feeling a little
resentment at having Italy perpetually rammed down his countrymen's
throats, and at such passages In particular as that in the discourse
on "the grand style".'' — "As for the various departments of painting,
which do not presume to make such high pretensions, they are
many. None of them are without their merit, though none enter
into competition with this universal presiding idea of the art" [this
by-the-by from " The President"]. " The painters who have applied
themselves more particularly to low and vulgar characters, and who
express with precision the various shades of passion as they are
exhibited by vulgar minds (such as we see In the works of Hogarth)
deserve great praise ; but as their genius has been employed on low
and confined subjects, the praise which we give must be as limited
as its object."

42 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
How true and how Important ! But also how exasperating. We
know that Reynolds was, and alone was, quahfied to discourse in this
strain ; but on the other hand Gainsborough was qualified, and alone
qualified, to be independent of it ; and Interesting as it Is to know, as
Reynolds admitted' to Malone, that he had Paul Veronese in view
when painting the two groups of the Dilettante Society, we feel
much more charmed with Gainsborough's method of showing his fair
sitters into a room Illumined with but a single ray of light, and
engaging them In conversation until the moment arrived when he
would shout at them, " Stop as you are 1 "
It seems to me that some feeling of this sort more easily explains
Malone's account (which he had from Reynolds) of the relations
between two such discuneate painters, than any question of professional
rivalry or envy. " Soon after Gainsborough settled in London," says
Malone, " Sir Joshua Reynolds thought himself bound in civility to
pay him a visit. That painter, however (as our author told me),
took not the least notice of him for several years ; but at length
called on him, and requested him to sit for his picture. Sir Joshua
complied, and sat once to that artist, but being soon afterwards
taken ill, he was obliged to go to Bath for his health. On his
return to London perfectly restored, he sent Gainsborough word
that he was returned, to which Gainsborough, who was extremely
capricious, only replied that he was glad to hear that Sir Joshua
Reynolds was well ; and he never afterwards desired Sir Joshua to
sit, nor had any other intercourse with him till Gainsborough was
dying." Each went his own way ; the one to paint as many as one
hundred and twenty portraits of the nobility and gentry in a single
year, to frame his immortal discourses, and to send his sister out
driving in his state coach ; the other to thunder at the Academy
when his portrait of Royalty was not hung as he desired it, and to
dazzle the world with an Inexplicable technique that drew from
Quin the delightful criticism, related by Angelo, "Sometimes, Tom
Gainsborough, the same picture from your rigmarole style appears
to my optics the veriest daub, and then — the devil's in you  I think
you a Vandyke."

The Royal Academy of 1787. From an engraving by I: A. Marlini after Ramberg.

THE INFLUENCE OF I^TNOLDS .AND QAINSBOROUGH 43
Still more extraordinary was Gainsborough's " mopping," as it was
commonly called, when he employed all the kitchen crockery and a
quantity of sponges In the composition of landscape sketches — a
meccanismo which became so popular that even the Queen had lessons
from him. That he was so favoured of Royalty to the exclusion
of Reynolds, even Angelo cannot explain, only suggesting that Gains
borough's charming personality was the most probable cause. " When
my father was In attendance at Buckingham House," he writes,
" Gainsborough was busily engaged in painting separate portraits of
the Royal children. He used to tell my father he was all but
raving mad with ecstasy in beholding such a constellation of youth
ful beauty. Indeed he used sometimes to rattle away in so hyper
bolical a strain upon the subject of his art, that any indifferent
observer would have concluded the painter was beside his wits.
' Talk of the Greeks ! ' he would exclaim, ' the pale-faced, long-
nosed, unmeaning-visaged ghosts ! Look at the living, delectable
carnations in this royal progeny. Talk of old Dame Cornelia, the
mother of the Gracchi ! ' (addressing himself to his own painted
resemblance of the sons and daughter of his Royal employer). 'Sir,
here you behold half a score of youthful divinities I Look on, ye
Gods ! ' ' Hist,' my father would say, ' Mister Gainsborough ! you
will be overheard, and we shall both be sent to St. Luke's.' ' St.
Luke's, sir,' replied the madcap, ' know ye not that I am a painter,
ergo a son of St. Luke ? Ha ! ha ! ha ! ' "
The arrival of two such great portrait painters so entirely upset
the existing state of the arts in England, and raised the practice of
portraiture to such an unexpected height, that it is a little difficult
to decide how far our ideas of society are affected by the painters,
and how far the painters were influenced by society, or whether, in
fact, they had any effect upon each other at all. At first thought
it seems almost as if these two creators had of themselves brought
into existence an entirely new race of superlntelllgent characters, and,
like Deucalion and Pyrrha, peopled these islands, that of late had
seemed to be overrun by pickpockets and prostitutes, with a society of
statesmen, wits, and beauties which but for them would never have
come into existence. It was not merely that England was becoming

44 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
more civilised — she is doing that still; but that the genius of two
of her children seems all of a sudden to have transformed the coarse
English Society of Hogarth and Fielding into ranks of great per
sonages, and to have given them such an everllving quality that
their features and figures are still almost as familiar to us, and at
least as Inspiring to the imagination, as those of the men and women
whom we point out to our country cousins to-day^
That there were any good portraits painted before Reynolds'
"Admiral Keppel" ushered in the new epoch, Is perhaps hardly as
well known, or at least remembered, as that there was a super
abundance of bad ones; for Reynolds, not content with eclipsing
his predecessors, went so far as to stigmatise their period as one in
which "art was at the lowest state it had ever been in, it could
not be lower." Nevertheless there were some very capable men
at work in painting portraits, whose work would be much more
appreciated if it were more studied. Philip Mercier I have already
mentioned. George Knapton, besides being an able painter, is noted
by Vertue for being "the most skilful judge or connoisseur in
pictures," on which account he was appointed by the Prince of
Wales keeper of the pictures at Kensington Palace. "At several
times seeing Mr. Knapton at his house," wrote Vertue in 1750
(Add. MS. 23074, fol. 72), I observed his great improvement In
oil painting — particularly a large family piece of the Duke and
Duchess of Bedford and their children in one picture. Also another
family piece of a gentleman, his lady and child, well drawn, dis
posed, and well coloured and painted, which pieces no doubt will
do him much credit." At Althorp is a portrait group painted by
him in 1745 of the Hon. John Spencer, with dog and gun, and his
son, the first Earl Spencer, and a black servant, which is not at all
a bad example of what a family picture ought to be. Hudson's
portraits, too, are by no means as negligible as his pupil's performances
have conspired with other circumstances to make them, and besides
the goodly number of painters whose names are more or less
familiar, there were doubtless many of sterling merit of whom we
know nothing, such as the following note, extracted by Vertue from
the Daily Advertiser in 175 1, seems to refer to: —

THE INFLUENCE OF ^ETNOLDS .AND QAINSBOROUGH 45
" Andreas Mustard, limner in enamel and miniature ; come
to London — learnt of Rosalba in Venice : has drawn pictures
of Nobles, Princes, and Kings ; his price for enamelling, ten
guineas : for limning, five guineas : in crayons, two guineas."
But Reynolds' most serious rival at this early period was Ramsay,
of whose pictures Vertue observes in the same year that they were
" much superior in merit than other portrait painters — his men's
pictures strong likenesses, firm in drawing, and true flesh colouring,
natural tinctures : his ladles delicate and genteel — easy free likenesses —
their habits and dresses well disposed and airy. His flesh tints under
his silks and satins, &c., shining beautiful and clear with great
variety ; his portraits generally very like ; rather a true imitation of
nature than any mannerist."
Walpole's letter to Sir David Dalrymple in 1759 is a very
useful note at this critical moment. He mentions Ramsay the painter
as the writer of certain anonymous pieces, and continues : "In his
own walk he has great merit. He and Mr. Reynolds are the favourite
painters, and two of the very best we ever had. Indeed the number
of good has been very small considering the number there are. A
very few years ago there were computed two thousand , portrait
painters in London ; I do not exaggerate the computation, but
diminish it, though I think it must have been exaggerated."
But still more surprising is what follows : —
" Mr. Reynolds and Mr. Ramsay can scarce be rivals ; their
manners are so different. The former is bold, and has a kind of
tempestuous colouring, yet with dignity and grace ; the latter Is all
delicacy. Mr. Reynolds seldom succeeds in women, Mr. Ramsay
is formed to paint them."
This, however, was long before the enchanting picture of Nelly
O'Brien was painted, and before the end of 1761 Walpole had so far
modified his seemingly extraordinary opinion as to mention " a pretty
whole-length of Lady Elizabeth Keppel in the bridesmaid's habit,
sacrificing to Hymen " ; but this is only put in as d propos of the
preceding sentence : " Did you see the charming picture Reynolds
painted for me of him (Hon. Richard Edgecumbe), Selwyn, and

46 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
Gilly Williams ? It is by far one of the best things he has
executed." This is one of the few " conversation pieces " that were painted
by Reynolds, the great bulk of his work being of course single
portraits. Family groups, even, are rare, which is a matter for the
keenest regret, when we see how perfect a master of composition
his studies in Italy had helped to make him. One of his earliest
pictures, painted in 1746, is that of the Eliot family, at Port Eliot,
St. Germans, which is here reproduced from a small water-colour
belonging to Mr. G. Harland Peck. In 1777, Sir Joshua seems
to have reverted somewhat to groups, for there are no less than four
that belong to this year or the next. First there is the pair of,
large portrait groups of the Dilettante Society (now at the Grafton
Gallery), the club for which, said Walpole, the nominal qualification
was having been In Italy, and the real one being drunk. Then
there is the Bedford family group, in which the Duke is repre
sented as St. George in the act of combat with the dragon, while Miss
Vernon is Sabrina, and Lords John and William fill up the landscape.
But the most important of all is the superb Marlborough picture, in
which there are no less than eight figures — to say nothing of the dogs
— which Ticozzi is not far wrong in naming as il suo capo d' opera.
If there is not very much of Sir Joshua's work that illustrates
the manners and actions of people, there is still less of Gains
borough's ; and of what there is, one cannot help feeling that Sir
Walter Armstrong's criticism is very true. "In such complex
matters as groups of many figures," he writes, "Gainsborough was
never successful in hitting upon a quite satisfactory conception. The
Balllie family in the National Gallery is a collection of beautiful
passages. It Is not a picture. In a less degree we may say the same
thing of the Marsham family, of the eldest Princesses, and even
of such compararively simple things as the Sussex group, or the
Eliza and Tom Linley. In each of these, separate ideas were
suggested by the different figures, and the painter was defective in
the faculty required for seducing them into a real intimacy
The only striking exceptions to this are afforded by those few cases
in which his portraits become so far subject pictures as to suggest

The I-t.io'I' 1''amily. By Sir Joshua Reynolds. From a waler-eoloiir in the possession of G. Harland Veek.

THE INFLUENCE OF HETNOLDS .AND QAINSBOROUGH 47
an independent title, like ' The Morning Walk.' . . ." This last
sentence must certainly be taken to include the beautiful picture of
" Ladies Walking in the Mall," belonging to Sir Audley Neeld, which
is perhaps the very finest example there is of a picture of English
Society. But, save for exceptions of this sort, it is not the actual
works of Reynolds and Gainsborough so much as their example and
the effect they had on the art of their time that concern us, and we
may begin to look round and see who else there was who has
depicted Society In one form or another.
George Romney, who is certainly nearer, and that by many degrees,
to Reynolds and Gainsborough than any one of his time, or since,
has succeeded in getting, appears to have started his career by
painting composition pieces as well as the portraits of his Westmore
land neighbours ; and Cunningham mentions that he exhibited about
a score of these in the Town Hall at Kendal, and disposed of them
by lottery. Most of these had disappeared long before Cunningham's.
time, and young Romney relates how he and his father discovered
one of them at Barfield in 1798, when they were looking over a
house with a view to taking it, and thus describes it : " It repre
sents a party consisting of three gentlemen and two ladles going
on board a boat on a lake. The ladles show great timidity, so
natural to the female character under the impression of danger,
which expression is frequently accompanied by a certain degree of
grace ; but are politely urged by their attendant gallants. The
colouring is beautifully clear and as fresh as if recently painted.
The execution evinces great facility and freedom of handling, and
the touches are spirited and neat."
That we have no more of such compositions and but few family
pieces of Romney's, Is perhaps accounted for by another Incident related
by Cunningham, namely, a visit from Garrick in the year 1768, or
thereabouts, when Romney had been painting the Leigh family in a
group, which he exhibited at the Free Society of Artists in that
year. Cumberland had persuaded Garrick to visit Romney, who,
before his tour to Italy, found London none too sympathetic, and
was sadly in need of encouragement. Whether Garrick's pleasantry
was ill or well intentioned it may not be possible to determine;,

48 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
but it certainly appears to have been the latter, or we can hardly
imagine how a North countryman would have suffered such intolerable
impertinence from a stranger, however illustrious. A large family
piece, says Cunningham, unluckily arrested his attention — a gentle
man in a close buckled bob-wig and a scarlet waistcoat laced with
gold, with his wife and children (some sitting, some standing), had
taken possession of some yards of canvas, very much, as it appeared,
to their own satisfaction — for they were perfectly amused in a con
tented abstinence from all thought or action. Upon this unfortunate
group, when Garrick had fixed his lynx's eyes, he began to put him
self into the attitude of the gentleman, and turning to Mr. Romney,
" Upon my word, sir," said he, " this is a very regular well-ordered
family, and that is a very bright rubbed mahogany table at which
that motherly good lady is sitting ; and this worthy gentleman in the
scarlet waistcoat is doubtless a very excellent subject (to the State, I
mean, if these are all his children), but not for your art, Mr. Romney,
if you mean to pursue It with that success which I hope will attend
you." The modest artist, Cunningham adds, took the hint as it was
meant, in good part, and turned his family with their faces to the
wall. One cannot help wishing David Garrick anywhere but in
Romney's studio after hearing this, for there is no doubt that
Romney had a very good feeling for grouping figures, and indeed
one of his first portraits done in London, that gave him a great
vogue, was that of Sir George Warren and his lady, and their little
girl caressing a bullfinch, which, says Cunningham, was so full of
nature and tenderness that all who saw it went away admiring, and
spread praise of the artist far and near.
The picture of the Gower children, again, painted in 1777, is a
charming example of his success in groups of figures; four or five
studies for this, in sepia, were once in my possession, all of them
differing considerably, and showing what pains he was at, and how
successful they were, in the arrangement of a family picture. Another
group painted at about the same rime is that of the Beaumont
family; and in 1795 ^e executed two most important groups, one of
the Bosanquet family, in which there are six full-length figures, and
the famous Egremont picture at Petworth.

/¦ -*'" "

.^y

'^<r.;<^^;--' X-
*s,'N '^'Jat
k-Q •— V
Author Ke.adini; from a Manusorh'I to F'our Laiues. From a Il'aler-colour Drawing by Al. Haughlo
Randall Davies, F.S.A,
THE INFLUENCE OF 1(ETN0LDS .AND QAINSBOROUGH 49
Before we pass on to some of the minor artists of this period,
let us glance for a moment at one or two notes by contemporary
writers that may help to show us how the times were moving.
Walpole is of course the most entertaining authority for this, even
more than for other periods of the century, and for a terse outline
of the annual course of Society in 1763, we may turn to a letter of
his to Lord Hertford. "We are a very absurd nation," he writes,
"but then that absurdity depends upon the almanac. Posterity,
who will know nothing of our intervals, will conclude that this age
was a succession of events. I could tell them [the French] that we
know as well when an event as when Easter will happen. Do but
recollect this last ten years. The beginning of October one is
certain that everybody will be at Newmarket, and the Duke of
Cumberland will lose and Shafto will win two or three thousand
pounds. After that, while people are preparing to come to town
for the winter, the Ministry is suddenly changed, and all the world
comes to learn how it happened, a fortnight sooner than they in
tended ; and fully persuaded that the new arrangement cannot last
a month. The Parliament opens ; everybody is bribed ; and the new
establishment is perceived to be composed of adamant. November
passes with two or three self-murders, and a new play. Christmas
arrives ; everybody goes out of town ; and a riot happens In one of
the theatres. The Parliament meets again . . . balls and assemblies
begin ; some master and miss get together, are talked of, and give
occasion to forty more matches being invented. . . . Ranelagh opens,
and Vauxhall ; one produces scandal, and t'other a drunken quarrel.
People separate, some to Tunbridge and some to all the horse races
in England ; and so the year comes again to October."
In a letter to Montagu in the following year he is a little more
particular. " If you like to know the state of the town," he says,
"here it is. In the first place it is very empty (this was on the
1 6th December), and in the next there arc more diversions than the
week will hold. A charming Italian Opera, with no dances and
no company, at least on Tuesdays ; to satisfy which defect the
subscribers are to have a ball and a supper — a plan that in my
humble opinion will fill the Tuesdays and empty the Saturdays.

50 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
At both playhouses are woful English Operas ; which, however, fill
better than the Italian, patriotism being entirely confined to our
ears; how long the sages of the law will leave us these I cannot
say. . . . Well, but there are more joys; a dinner and assembly
every Monday at the Austrian Minister's ; ditto on Thursdays at
the Spaniard's ; ditto on Wednesdays and Sundays at the French
Ambassador's, besides Madame de Welderen's on Wednesdays, Lady
Harrington's Sundays, and occasional private mobs at my Lady
Northumberland's. Then for the mornings there are levees and
drawing-rooms without end, not to mention the Macaroni Club,
which has quite absorbed Arthur's, for you know old fools will be
after young ones."
Another of Walpole's letters to the sympathetic George Montagu
contains an enlightening little passage on country town society, when
he was being elected as member of Parliament for the borough
of King's Lynn in 1761. "Think of me," he writes, "the subject
of a mob, who was scarce ever before in a mob, addressing them
in the Town Hall, riding at the head of two thousand people
through such a town as Lynn, dining with about two hundred of
them amid bumpers, hurras, soup and tobacco, and finishing with
country dancing at a ball and sixpenny whisk! I have borne it all
cheerfully; nay, have sat hours in conversation, the thing upon earth
that I hate; have been to hear misses play on the harpsichord, and
to see an alderman's copies of Rubens and Carlo Marat. Yet to
do the folks justice they are sensible, and reasonable and civilised ;
their very language is (become) polished since I (last) lived among
them. I attribute this to their frequent intercourse with the world
and the capital, by the help of good roads and postchaises which,
if they have abridged the King's dominions, have at least tamed
his subjects."
In 1769 Vauxhall was still in high fashion, and Walpole gives a
vivid picture of a Ridotto al fresco there at the beginning of May.
"Mr. Conway and I set out from his house at eight o'clock; the
tide and torrent of coaches was so prodigious that it was half-an-
hour after nine before we got half-way from Westminster Bridge.
We then alighted ; and after scrambling under the bellies of horses.

Greenwich Hill. From a print dated I'jbi. Craee Colleelion, British Museum.

THE INFLUENCE OF I^ETNOLDS .AND QAINSBOROUGH 51
through wheels and over posts and rails, we reached the gardens,
where were already many thousand persons. Nothing diverted me
but a man in Turk's dress and two nymphs in masquerade without
masques, who sailed among the company, and, which was surprising,
seemed to surprise nobody. It had been given out that people
were desired to come in fancied dress without masks. We walked
twice round, and were rejoiced to come away, though with the
same difficulties as at our entrance, for we found three strings of
coaches all along the road who did not move half a foot in half
an hour. There is to be a rival mob in the same way at Ranelagh
to-morrow, for the greater the folly and imposition the greater is
the crowd."
Of the private or domestic occupations of society it is more
difficult to find either descriptions or Illustrations ; but there is a
charming little picture by Goldsmith, framed in the form of a
letter from a young lady, a leader of fashion in 1760 or there
abouts, that is certainly worth quoting : —
"As I live, my dear Charlotte, I believe the Colonel will carry
it at last; he is a most irresistible fellow, that's flat. So well
dressed, so neat, so sprightly, and plays about one so agreeably,
that I vow he has as much spirits as the Marquis of Monkeyman's
Italian greyhound. I first saw him at Ranelagh ; he shines there ;
he is nothing without Ranelagh, and Ranelagh nothing without
him. The next day he sent a card and compliments, desiring to
wait on mamma and me to the music subscription. He looked
all the time with such irresistible impudence, that positively he
had something in his face gave me as much pleasure as a pair-royal
of naturals in my own hand. He waited on mamma and me the
next morning to know how we got home ; you must know the
insidious devil makes love to us both. Rap went the footman at
the door; bounce went my heart; I thought he would have rattled
the house down. Chariot drove up to the window with his foot
men in the prettiest liveries ; he has infinite taste, that's flat.
Mamma had spent all the morning at her head ; but for my part, I
was in an undress to. receive him ; quite easy, mind that ; no way

52 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
disturbed at his approach ; mamma pretended to be as digagi as
I, and yet I saw her blush in spite of her. Positively he is a
most killing devil ! He did nothing but laugh all the time he
staid with us; I never heard so very many good things before;
at first he mistook mamma for my sister, at which she laughed:
then he mistook my natural complexion for paint, at which I
laughed : and then he showed us a picture in the lid of his snuff
box, at which we all laughed. He plays picquet so very ill, and
is so very fond of cards, and loses with such a grace, that positively
he has won me; I have got a cool hundred, but have lost my
heart. I need not tell you that he is only a colonel of train
bands. I am, dear Charlotte, Your's for ever, Belinda."^
The feminine passion for gaming, of which a faint recurrence
occasionally flutters society even in modern times, was a constant
subject for satirical pen and pencil in the seventeenth and
eighteenth centuries — Hogarth's little picture of "The Lady's Last
Stake " is an instance ; and Goldsmith's Chinese friend. Lien Chi
Atlangi, has another rap at the English ladies under cover of
applauding their moderation as compared with the excesses of the
Chinese. After mentioning an instance of one of his countrywomen
staking her clothes, her teeth, and her glass eye- — all of which, it
would appear, were delivered over on the nail — and that of the
Spaniard who, when all his money was gone, endeavoured to borrow
more by offering to pawn his whiskers, he pays this delicate tribute
to the English ladles : —
"How happy, my friend, are the English ladies who never rise
to such an inordinance of passion 1 Though the sex here are
naturally fond of games of chance, and are taught to manage games
of skill from their infancy, yet they never pursue ill-fortune with
such amazing intrepidity. Indeed, I may entirely acquit them of
ever playing — I mean playing for their eyes or their teeth. It is
true they often stake their fortune, their beauty, health, and
reputations at a gaming table. It even sometimes happens that
' " Citizen of the World," vol. i. No, xxxix.

CniLiiREN OF Thomas A[ilw.\ri>. l-'roiii llie painling by J. Russell.

THE INFLUENCE OF ^ETNOLDS .AND QAINSBOROUGH 53
they play their husbands into a jail ; yet still they preserve a decorum
unknown to our wives and daughters of China. I have been present
at a rout in this country where a woman of fashion, after losing her
money, has sat writhing in all the agonies of bad luck; and yet,
after all, never once attempted to strip a single petticoat, or cover
the board, as her last stake, with her head-clothes."
Hogarth, whose career by-the-bye extended as far into this
period as 1765, left a very tolerable disciple in the person of John
Collett. Whether Collett was actually a pupil of Hogarth's or not,
I do not know ; but he was certainly an imitator, and has not only
left us a good many single prints designed in Hogarth's manner,
but even a series, which bears the alluring title of " Modern Love."
This series consists of four prints, which were engraved by J.
Goldar and published in 1782, the pictures no doubt being painted
considerably earlier. The first is " Courtship," where the foreground
is occupied by a very sentimental young lady who is presumably an
heiress, and an impassioned lover who Is doubtless impecunious.
The parents, unobserved, are watching the interview In consternation.
Plate 2 is styled "The Elopement," which has less interest than the
third, " The Honeymoon." Plate 4, " Discordant Matrimony," Is
the best of all, and is so naturally composed that it may fairly be
taken as an example of what a domestic Interior actually looked like
at that date, putting aside of course the Hogarthian letterpress that
is printed on every available space to point the moral.
Of the single prints, " High Life Below Stairs " is one of the
most successful, published in 1772. Another is "The Cotillion
Dance," published In 1771, in which are eight figures of dancers,
besides one or two spectators, and the musicians in a gallery.
Another is a village scene, "The Vicar going to Dinner with the
Esquire," engraved by T. Stayner in 1768, as is also "The Re
cruiting Sergeant," engraved by Goldar in the year following. In all
of these there is humour enough to enliven them, without their
being coarse or burlesque, and it is much to be regretted that none
of the original pictures are in our public galleries. That any of
them are still in existence, may, of course, be doubted; but my

54 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
own opinion is that if once the fashion set in for this class of
picture, there would be countless examples sent up to Christie's for
sale which are now hanging in obscure corners of country houses,
or standing face to the walls in the lumber rooms of provincial
dealers. An outcry is sometimes raised against the Trustees of the
National Gallery for their inability to give thousands and tens of
thousands for great and famous pictures, which in past years might
have been purchased for a tenth of the money now asked for them ;
but they might much more reasonably be urged to consider the
advisability of the nation now securing, by a little judicious industry
and less money, a few examples of the early British painters whose
names are not yet well enough known or regarded to inflate the
prices of their work Irrespective of its merit or its value in the
history of English painting. To show how feasible this is, it is
only necessary to turn to the British Museum, to whose Department
of Prints and Drawings we are indebted for almost all that is
known of any but the first rank of our earlier artists. Mr.
Laurence Binyon's catalogue of English drawings is a revelation to
any beginner in the study of this country's art, and, though the
collection Is far from complete, the most watchful eye is ever open
to secure any desirable additions at a reasonable price.
While Collett's work carries us back to the old school of
Hogarth, it is time to look forward to the newer art that under
the (then) quickening influence of the Royal Academy was springing
up and showing itself everywhere. A suitable instance for closing
this chapter is that of John Raphael Smith, whose work, though it
principally belongs to the last quarter of the century, has preserved
at least one very precious relic of the second quarter In his delicious
sketch of the Promenade at Carlisle House.
John Raphael Smith Is so well known as an engraver, that his
charm as a draughtsman has been rather eclipsed by the popularity
of his mezzotints after Sir Joshua and others of the great painters,
and even this delightful scene at Carlisle House is probably more
familiar to the public from the prints of it in the shop windows
than from the drawing itself, which is hung in the water-colour
galleries at the South Kensington Museum. His original work is

The Book .Shop. From a drawing by J. Raphael Smith. British Museum.

¦-^jJlFWr

.j^

jh-h ^^~\ c;

[VVi

It *=
,i i
ty^r
i\ \.
Two Gentlemen. From a drawing by Zoffany, Victoria and .Albert Museum.
THE INFLUENCE OF liETNOLDS .AND QAINSBOROUGH 55
lamentably scarce, and we may well wish that he had devoted less
time to engraving and more to drawing.
Carlisle House stood at the corner of Sutton Street, on the east
side of Soho Square. It was kept by Mrs. Cornelys, whom Walpole
indirectly stigmatises as the ugliest woman of her day by describing
Heidegger as her male counterpart. "On Wednesday evenings,"
wrote the eighteen-year-old Fanny Burney in her diary, "we went
to Mrs. Cornelys' with Papa and Miss Nancy Pascall. The magnifi
cence of the rooms, splendour of the illuminations and embellishment,
and the brilliant appearance of the company exceeded anything I ever
before saw. The apartments were so crowded we had scarce room to
move, which was quite disagreeable ; nevertheless, the flight of apart
ments both upstairs and on the ground floor seemed endless . .
the rooms were so full and hot that nobody attempted to dance."
It was In 1760 that Mrs. Cornelys — who had appeared In England
as an opera singer In 1746 — first took Carlisle House, which, under
her auspices, was during the next dozen years the scene of some of
the most brilliant assemblies that have ever been recorded. Casa
nova mentions that she had sometimes as many as six hundred
people In her saloon at one time at two guineas a head, and
even the institution of Almack's, In 1764, seems not to have affected
her success to any appreciable extent. " Mrs. Cornelys," writes
Walpole in this year, " apprehending the future assembly at Almack's,
has enlarged her vast room, and hung it with blue satin, and another
with yellow satin ; but Almack's room, which is to be ninety feet
long, proposes to swallow up both hers, as easily as Moses' rod
gobbled down those of the magicians." Mrs. Cornelys, however,
replied with an expenditure of a couple of thousand pounds In the
year following on furniture and embellishments, including " the
most curious, singular, and superb celling to one of the rooms that
was ever executed or even thought of," an outlay which was amply
justified by h'er future successes. In April 1768, for instance, the
following is recorded in the Daily Advertiser: —
" On Thursday last there was a remarkably brilliant Assembly
at Mrs. Cornelys' in Soho Square. There were present (besides

56 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
some of the Royal Family) many of the foreign ministry and
first nobility, the Prince of Monaco, and two or three of the
principal gentlemen in his Serene Highness' train. The Prince
seemed astonished at the profusion of state, elegance, and ex
pense displayed throughout the house, and declared his perfect
.approbation of the Assembly, as by far exceeding the highest
of his expectations, or what he could possibly have conceived
of any place of entertainment of that nature."
In the following August the King of Denmark honoured Mrs.
Cornelys' with a visit, and next year were added a new room for
the dancing of Cotillons and Allemandes, and a suite of new rooms
adjoining. In February 1770, one of the most brilliant masquerades
'of all was held, of which the following account in the papers is
printed in Mr. Clinch's most interesting edition of Dr. Rimbault's
MSS., with many other details of the history of this remarkable
though now totally forgotten house : —
" Monday night, the principal nobility and gentry of this king
dom, to the number of near eight hundred, were present at the
masked ball at Mrs. Cornelys' in Soho Square, given by the gentle
men of the Tuesday Night's Club, held at the Star and Garter
Tavern in Pall Mall, Soho Square and the adjacent streets were
lined with thousands of people, whose curiosity led them to get a
sight of the persons going to the masquerade ; nor was any coach
or chair suffered to pass unrevlewed, the windows being obliged to
be let down, and lights held up to display the figures to more
advantage. At nine o'clock the doors of the house were opened,
and from that time for about three or four hours the company con
tinued to pour into the assembly. At twelve the lower rooms were
opened ; in these were prepared the sideboards, containing sweetmeats
and a cold collation, in which elegance was more conspicuous than
profusion. . . . The richness and brilliancy of the dresses were
almost beyond imagination; nor did any assembly ever exhibit a
collecrion of more elegant and beautiful female figures. Among

2 G "S

¦S I
8 ji

¦S'

THE INFLUENCE OF T^ETNOLDS .AND QAINSBOROUGH 57
them were Lady Waldegrave, Lady Pembroke, the Duchess of
Hamilton, Mrs. Crewe, Mrs. Hodges, Lady Almeria Carpenter,
&c. Some of the most remarkable figures were a Highlander (Mr.
R. Conway) ; a double man, half miller, half chimney-sweeper (Sir R.
Phillips) ; a Political Bedlamite, run mad for Wilkes and Liberty and
No. 45 ; a figure of Adam in flesh-coloured silk, with an apron of
fig-leaves ; a Druid (Sir W. W. Wynne) ; a figure of Somebody ; a
figure of Nobody ; a running Footman, very richly dressed, with a
cap set with diamonds, and the words, " Tuesday Night's Club "
in the front (the Earl of Carlisle) ; His Royal Highness the Duke
of Gloucester in the old English habit, with a star on the cloak ;
Midas (Mr. James, the Painter) ; Miss Monckton, daughter to Lord
Galloway, appeared in the character of an Indian Sultana, in a robe
of cloth of gold and a rich veil. The seams of her habit were
embroidered with precious stones, and she had a magnificent cluster
of diamonds on her head ; the jewels she wore were valued at
^^30,000. The Duke of Devonshire was very fine, but in no par
ticular character. Captain Nugent, of the Guards, in the character
of Mungo, greatly diverted the company. The Countess Dowager
of Waldegrave wore a dress richly trimmed with beads and pearls,
in the character of Jane Shore. Her Grace of Ancaster claimed
the attention of all the company in the dress of Mandane.
The Countess of Pomfret, in the character of a Greek Sultana,
and the two Miss Fredericks, who accompanied her as Greek
slaves, made a complete group. The Duchess of Bolton in the
character of Diana, was captivating. Lord Edg — b, in the char
acter of an Old Woman, was full as lovely as his lady in that
of a Nun. Lady Stanhope, as Melpomene, was a striking fine
figure ; Lady Augusta Stuart as a Vestal, and Lady Caroline as
a Fille de Patmos, showed that true elegance may be expressed
without gold and diamonds. The Chimney-sweeper, Quack Doctor,
and a Friar acquitted themselves with much entertainment to the
company." Within the next two years, however, Mrs. Cornelys' successful
career was checked, and at the instigation of envious rivals she was

58 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
prosecuted and fined. For another dozen years or more the house
fitfully broke into splendour again, but with nothing of its former
lustre, and it was at last demolished in 1788. Smith's engraving
was published in 178 1, but it is probable that the drawing was made
somewhat earlier, though not as early as the really splendid period
of this extraordinary resort of fashion.

CHAPTER IV
THE CLOSE OF THE CENTURY
Roughly speaking, our four chapters coincide with the four quarters
of the century. The reigns of Anne and George I., as it happened,
not only in themselves marked off the first quarter, to within a couple
of years, but were fully accomplished before there was any sign of
the quickening influence, or atmosphere, of Hogarth. But as Hogarth
was alive and active beyond the middle of the second quarter, and
his career fits in more nearly with the reign of George II., so
Reynolds, Gainsborough, and Romney, to mention no others, who
distinguished the third quarter, were still working well on into the
fourth. By this time, however, the practice no less than the know
ledge of art was so widely extended, that whereas for the beginning
of the century one searched In vain for adequate examples to illus
trate our subject, it has now become rather a matter of embarrassment
what to choose out of such a multitude of charming, if not always
very classical, specimens as may be seen in almost any shop window.
Invention and industry had so multiplied the opportunities of inter
course, and accumulated such wealth for the nation, that art could
not fail to find encouragement of a much more practical kind than
the mere patronage of Royalty and a few of the nobility. For
engraving the print, for instance, of Copley's excellent though by
no means popular picture, "The Death of Chatham," Bartolozzi
had no less than ;^2000 ; while more than double the number of
subscribers were entered for it than for the sensational " Harlot's
Progress " of Hogarth. England had never been so rich, and the loss
of the American Colonies, so far from ruining England, seems to
have been the starting point of her present progress. " She rose
from it," as Green observes, "stronger and greater than ever, and
the next ten years saw a display of industrial activity such as the
59

6o ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
world had never witnessed before. During the twenty years which
followed she wrestled almost single-handed against the energy of the
French Revolution as well as against the colossal force of Napoleonic
tyranny, and came out of the one struggle unconquered and out of
the other a conqueror."
Society, in the meantime, went on much as it usually does when
great events are stirring, and, whether or not the pen was mightier
than the sword, the brush at this time was quite as busy as the
cannon ; while Nelson was fitting himself for a national monument
in Trafalgar Square, the fascinating Emma was no less readily en
gaged in being commemorated in records of a more perishable but
quite as popular a quality, while of all the men who contributed
to England's marvellous advancement at this period there are hardly
more than one or two who are not, probably, better known by their
portraits than for their achievements. Reynolds and Gainsborough
had, in fact, created such a demand for good pictures that others
had to supply it, and had set such an example that others had to
follow it, so that while these two names are still the foremost during
the greater part of the last quarter of the century, it is rather to
some of the stars of the lesser magnitudes that our remaining pages
should be devoted. Of these not a few have been made so familiar
to the public of late years through the enterprise of the fashionable
dealers, that the term "star" may seem to fit them in its theatrical
rather than its celestial sense, and it is really rather difficult to say
anything about them that is not common knowledge. Downman,
for instance, whose delightful profiles are being raked out of every
corner in England to be scrambled for at Christie's ; Cosway, Beechey,
Plimer, Wheatley, Morland, Russell, and Raeburn, too, are names
that the mere mention of is enough to rally all Bond Street; and
even Lawrence has fetched his thousands, and Hoppner his tens of
thousands. All of these were, in one sense or another, painters of
Society, and most, if not all of them, very good ones too; while
among the caricaturists are Gilray, Bunbury, and Rowlandson, whose
collective works would of themselves tell us volumes about the Society
of their time. But these are by no means the only ones, and there is
still a great deal of talent that Is waiting for fuller recognition.

A Windy D.\y. From aivater-eoloiir dratoing by R. Dighton. Vieloria and Albert Museum.

THE CLOSE OF THE CENTURT 6i
First, let us make our compliments to a lady who, besides
penning a thousand descriptions of Society as she found it at the
beginning of this last quarter of the century, might almost be supposed
from the following eulogy to have painted at least one picture of
it: "Thank you, my dear Fanny," writes Daddy Crisp to Miss
Burney, "for your conversation piece at Sir James Lake's. If speci
mens of this kind had been preserved of the different tons that
have succeeded one another for twenty centuries last past, how
interesting would they have been ! To compare the vanities and
puppyisms of the Greek and Roman, and Gothic, and Moorish,
and ecclesiastic reigning fine gentlemen of the day with one another,
and the present age, must be a high entertainment to a mind that
has a turn for a mixture of contemplation and satire ; and to do
you justice, Fanny, you paint well ; therefore send me more and
more." This was written in 1776, only a year or two before Miss Burney's
"Evelina" had done for fiction what Reynolds' "Admiral Keppel"
had done for portrait painting. With "Evelina" the world starts
afresh, and instead of watching with a sort of dim curiosity the
strange adventures of Toms or Josephs, and the trials of Pamelas and
Amelias, we find ourselves in the society of Evelina and her friends
and acquaintances without feeling in the least out of date. It is
like passing from a wilderness of rhubarb and horse-radish into a
garden of roses and pinks. Page after page of Fanny Burney's
diary might be quoted, and scene after scene from " Evelina," to show
what English Society had become ; but there is no excuse for doing
so in a book of this sort until Evelina and her authoress have been
as effectually superseded in the hearts of English readers as she has
superseded the roughshod sons of Pegasus who trampled the road
before her. As students we can still read and admire the genius of
Fielding and Smollett, but with the characters they delineate we have
nothing in common. If I met Pamela in the street I do not for
the life of me know what I should talk to her about, while as for
Joseph Andrews or Peregrine Pickle, I should feel more inclined to hand
them over to the servants. But Evelina ! The heart-strings jerk
at the very thought ; while even Madame Duval might help one to

62 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
pass a very amusing evening at Earl's Court. But let us see what
our painters are doing.
There is a letter of Charlotte Burney's published in Mrs. Ellis's
edition of Fanny's early diary and correspondence that contains its
own excuse for its being quoted here, not only as a description of
Society, but also as mentioning one of the minor illustrators of the
Society of his time, Edward Burney. " The masquerade at the
Pantheon," she writes to her sister, on the loth April 1780, "was
rather thinnish, owing, as they suppose, to so many people seeing
masks — but there was one person there I fancy you'll be a little
surprised to hear of ... no other than Mr. Edward Burney — papa
gave him his Proprietor's Ticket, and the dress cost him nothing
but a day's work, for he went as a native of Otaheite, so he cook'd
up a dress out of Jemm's Otaheite merchandise. I contrived to
go to York Street that night to tea, and saw his dress, which was
a very good one, he went privately to Sir Joshua's and took a
sketch of Omiah's dress, which he copied in his own pretty easily . . .
[the further description of this it costs me a pang to omit] — but I
have something to tell you about Edward that I think you will not
be displeased at. He has just finished three stain'd drawings in
miniature, designs for 'Evelina' — and most sweet things they are.
The design of the first volume is the scene of Ranelagh after the
disaster of Madame Duval and Monsieur du Bois. He had just
caught the moment when Madame French is going to dash the
candle out of the Captain's hand ; he says he was very much puzzled
how to give Madame Duval the beau-reste, but we think he has suc
ceeded delightfully. But Monsieur Slippery is my favourite figure.
I do think it a most incomparable one indeed ! So miserably triste !
He has taken him shivering by the fire. Evelina is introduced into
all three, and a most lovely creature he has made of her, but it's
whimsical enough that there must certainly be a likeness between
Edward's Evelina and Miss Streatfeild, as separately and apart (as
Sir Anthony Branville says) Susan and I were both struck by the
resemblance. The subject in the second volume is the part where
Evelina is sitting in that dejected way, leaning her arm on the
table, and Mr. Villars Is watching her at the door before she

Hucicin(;ham Hoi'se. From a IValcr-coloiir Ih-awing by Edward Daves. Victoria and .llhcrl Miiscuni.

THE CLOSE OF THE CENTURT 63
perceives him. The design for the third volume is as affecting as
that for the second, it is the scene between Evelina and her father
when she is kneeling and he in an agony is turning from her. I
think there can't be a greater proof of Edward's having read and
felt every passage in the book than these drawings. My father is
so pleased with them that he has shown them to Sir Joshua Reynolds
and ask'd him whether there would be any impropriety in putting
them into the Exhibition? Sir Joshua highly approved of the pro
posal, and sure enough into the Exhibition they are to go, and Mr.
Barry, who is mightily struck with them, has promised of his own
accord to endeavour to procure a good place for them — Sir Joshua
was amazed that he could do anything original so well, as he had
seen nothing but copies before of his doing — he said some very
handsome things of them, and was much pleased with the picture
(that Edward had introduced into Mr. Villars' parlour) of Dr.
Johnson, as he says he thinks it very natural for so good a man
as Mr. Villars to have a value for Dr. Johnson. But pray, my
dear Fanny, write me word of what you think of all this. It is a
very popular subject, and they are to be inserted in the catalogue
' Designs for Evelina.' "
Another illustrator of "Evelina" was John Hamilton Mortimer,
R.A., an artist whose work has been unaccountably neglected. He
was a native of Sussex, and when he came to London in 1760 he
made a lucky hit in painting the Royal coach, for the King was so
pleased with the public attention it attracted when he drove abroad
in it that he gave Mortimer some encouragement. His rather
loose habits are supposed to have interfered with his success,
though Cunningham is probably nearer the mark in explaining that
Mortimer lost patronage from want of skill or want of inclination
(when painting portraits) " to dip his brush In the hues of heaven
and soothe the fair or the vain, so that he had no chance of
profitable success in that line."
His etchings of Shakespearian and other subjects are, at least, as
valuable as those of his contemporaries, Bartolozzi, Cipriani, and
Angelica Kauffmann, while his picture of himself at the National
Portrait Gallery is a great deal more interesting than the common

64 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
run, and shows him to have been a skilful and accomplished painter.
The Illustration opposite this page is reproduced from a drawing of
a family group, in my own collection, that may possibly be a sketch
for the picture mentioned in the Academy catalogue of 1778 as "a
small family picture, full length," though it is more probably a
suggestion for the large picture at Shardeloes of the Drake family,
which Edwards mentions as having been painted in 1777 or 1778,
The picture is widely different in detail, and contains three more
men — sons and sons-in-law of William Drake — than the drawing;
but the general scheme is the same, including the father seated by
the table, on which is a globe, and examining the plans of the house
then newly built in such exquisite style by the brothers Adam. As
this picture has never, I believe, been exhibited, it may be worth while
to note a few of the points in which it differs from my drawing.
In the first place, the arrangement of the background is similar, but
instead of the sea view is a landscape, apparently the view from
the house, of Amersham. The grouping of the furniture is the
same, but the pieces themselves are not, and the floor is covered with
an oriental carpet. Seated in the chair on our right is a gentleman
in uniform, and between him and the table are two others standing.
On the sofa on our left are two ladies, one with a tambour frame
and the other with a spool of thread, while in the place of the dog
there is an open work-basket. Behind the sofa is standing a gentle
man in black, presumably the Rev. John Drake, who was Rector
of Amersham for fifty years.
Before leaving "Evelina," we may mention a couple of Miss
Burney's acquaintances, of whom one, at least, was a very consider
able figure as a portrait painter. This was Catherine Reid, whose
skill in crayon portraits earned her the title of "The English
Rosalba." Fanny Burney alludes to her as "the famous pantress,"
and records two visits to her and her niece. Miss Beatson, who
was also an artist, which are perhaps worth quoting. "Miss Reid
is shrewd and clever," she writes (in 1774, when Miss Reid must
have been quite an old lady), "where she has any opportunity given
her to make it known; but she is so very deaf, that it is a fatigue
to attempt any conversation with her. She is most exceedingly ugly.

A Family Group. From a drawing for the picture at Sliardehes by P H. Mcrlim-'r. Randall Davies, F.S.

THE CLOSE OF THE CENTURT 65
and of a very melancholy, or rather discontented, humour. . . .
Miss Beatson is a very young and very fine girl, not absolutely
handsome, yet Infinitely attractive ; she Is sensible, smart, quick, and
comical ; and has not only an understanding which seems already to
be mature, but a most astonishing genius for drawing, though never
taught. She groups figures of children in the most ingenious,
playful, and beautiful variety of attitudes and employments in a
manner surpassing all credibility, but what the eye Itself obtains :
in truth she is a very wonderful girl."
Miss Beatson married a couple of years later, which may
possibly account for posterity hearing no more of her wonderful
~ talent. Her husband was Charles Oakley, who was made a baronet
in 1790, and Governor of Madras in 1794.
In February 1775 Fanny paid another visit to Miss Reid, and
gives an amusing account of her eccentricity, which, at that par
ticular moment, was centred (if I may say so) on the making of
a petticoat. " Her crayon drawings," she notes, " nearly reach
perfection ; their not standing appears to me the only inferiority
they have to oil-colours ; while they are new nothing can be so
soft, so delicate, so blooming. . . . She is a very clever woman,
and in her profession has certainly very great merit ; but her turn
of mind is naturally melancholy. . . . When the foul fiend Is not
tormenting her she is even droll and entertaining."
Nelly Beatson was disobliging on this occasion, and refused to
show her drawings, but "as we were going," Fanny continues,
"Miss Reid called me, and said she wanted to speak to me. 'I
have a favour to ask of you,' said she, 'which is that you will sit
to me In an attitude.' I burst out in laughter, and told her I was
then in haste; but would call soon and talk about it. I cannot
imagine what she means; however. If it is to finish any burlesque
picture, I am much at her service." Unfortunately, she never did
call on Miss Reid again.
John Singleton Copley, whom we were fortunate enough to
welcome in England a year or two before the Declaration of
Independence, was content, like West before him and Whistler
since, to stay with us ; and in the Intervals between painting such

66 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
momentous scenes as the death of Chatham, the French at St.
Heller, or the " Arrest of the Five Members," endeared himself to his
country's oppressors and their posterity by such charming family
groups as that of the Sitwell family, which, by Sir George's kind
permission. Is here reproduced.
That Copley was an able draughtsman is evident enough from
his two large pictures in the National Gallery, and in the
National Art Library at South Kensington is a series of his
studies for the repulse of the floating batteries at Gibraltar, for
which it is to be hoped that room will be found for exhibition
when the new buildings are open. Most of his work is in
America, where he is said to have painted between two and
three hundred portraits and other pieces before he came to Europe,
and whatever there may be in England is seldom seen. Considering
how great a number of single portraits were painted, it is the
more regrettable that we have not more examples of Copley, who
was so excellent a composer of pictures of living people. It seems
to have been a tradition in England that only gods and goddesses
were suitable for painting in numbers, or scriptural characters, or
heroes and heroines of drama and history, and the living men and
women were only to be painted singly. How much more interest
ing Thornhill would have been if he had condescended to illustrate
the scenes he lived in Instead of the celestial and mythical groups
by which he is now distantly recognised. How much more would
Fuseli now be thought of If, instead of scenes from Shakespeare, he
had painted the actual people he met. His drawings of con
temporary people, that occasionally come to the surface at Christie's,
are full of charm and wonder, and could he have brought himself
to earth and forsworn raw pork for supper, his pictures would
probably be now as highly prized as those of any of his con
temporaries. Copley seems to have followed Zoffany in his fondness for
family pictures, and Cunningham, after alluding to a very fine
group of Copley himself, his wife and children, in which he says
"there is much nature In the looks of the whole and some very
fine colouring," goes on to mention an amusing instance of what

The Children of Francis Sitwei l, Ks'.i. From the painting by J. S. Copley. Sir George Sit-well. Bart.

THE CLOSE OF THE CENTURT 67
was required of the artist in this direction. A certain man came
to him, and had himself and his wife and seven children all
included in a family piece. " It wants but one thing," said the
man, "and that is the portrait of my first wife." "But," said
the artist, " she is dead, you know, sir — what can I do ? She is
only to be admitted as an angel." " Oh no, not at all," answered
the other, " she must come in as a woman ; no angels for me."
The portrait was added ; but some time elapsed before the person
came back. When he returned he had a strange lady on his arm.
"I must have another cast of your hand, Copley," he said. "An
accident befell my second wife : this lady Is my third, and she
is come to have her likeness included in the family picture." The
painter complied ; and the likeness was introduced, and the husband
looked with satisfaction on his three spouses. Not so the lady ;
she remonstrated ; never was such a thing heard of — out her
predecessors must go. The artist painted them out accordingly,
and had to bring an action at law to obtain payment for the
portraits which he had obliterated.
The picture of the painter and his family above mentioned is now
in Boston, America. It was last seen in England at the Exhibition
of 1862, where it was greatly admired for its "composition, drawing,
force of expression, and fine colour." The Sitwell picture may
readily be accorded praise for the same qualities, to which may be
added another that is perhaps the rarest of all in these family groups,
namely vivacity. To group a family in their natural surroundings
sounds easy enough — but how few have ever accomplished It
successfully ! Holbein's famous drawing of the More family in
their house at Chelsea is one of the great examples, but one feels
that they were all there for no other purpose than making a family
record. Hals' Van Bereslyn family at the Louvre Is in reality much
more successful, for though one sees that the parents knew they were
sitting there to be painted, their children are so naturally occupied
that one feels, or at least imagines, they did not know it. Two of
them are occupied with a young bird that has been snatched from
its nest in the wood at whose edge the family are grouped. The
others are playing with flowers, while the two adult women are

68 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
engrossed with the children. Now this is exactly what would
happen if, as Is intended by the painter to be imagined, he made a
sketch of them just as they were. The parents, who commissioned
the work, are conscious of being painted. The children are not ;
while the grown-up women — whether they are nurses or other — ¦
are too much occupied with the children to know whether they
are conscious or not. The result Is a perfectly natural picture,
brimming with life.
Copley, it need hardly be said, was not of the same rank as
Hals ; but in this picture of the Sitwells we can see that he had
something of the secret of making a picture live of Itself besides
charming the beholder. He takes Miss Sitwell and stands her In
the best light at the open window In one of the new rooms at
Renishaw, through which a charming view of the North Derbyshire
hills makes an effective background for her, on either side being
the plain green wall of the room, pink window curtains, marble
chimney-piece, and a pot of flowers to relieve a dark corner. He
observes that she is delightfully dressed, in a cool and airy white
frock, low-necked, and Is wearing the most enchanting hat with a
diaphanous brim, which he can make into a nimbus, though without
stopping out the feathers and ribbons that can be seen through it.
He admires her striped sash, which he finds very useful in breaking
the monotony of the white frock, and does not object to her holding
an open music book as a hint of her accomplishments. Meantime
her two little brothers had been building a card house on the floor;
and if it was not so nearly in front of her when they began It, It
is now very usefully placed in the foreground, and is obviously more
interesting than the wheelbarrow that balances it. Hart, the
youngest boy, appears to have been lured from architecture to the
true but baser uses of the cards, and to have selected a thumping
hand. The card house has reached the second storey, under the
able attentions of Francis, when in comes Sitwell, the son and heir,
from riding, and throwing his hat on the floor, by way of deference
to his sister, of whom he takes no other notice for the moment,
he proceeds jocularly to overthrow his little brothers' card house
with his whip. Now it is the recognised characteristic of eldest

THE CLOSE OF THE CENTURT 69
brothers in all ages to slight their sisters, and domineer over their
little brothers. They are encouraged in It by their parents, from
generation to generation, until it has become an hereditary trait by
which they are easily distinguished. Consciously or not, Copley
uses this characteristic in painting his family group, and the effect
is a living picture, and not a mere collection of likenesses ; one feels
that if this was not actually the way the picture came to be com
posed, it might very well have been. As it happens, Sitwell, the
heir, is evidently a very charming young fellow, and his instinctive
domineering is not of a nature to be the least resented by his small
brothers, who obviously love him very much. Copley, too, seems
to have regarded him as a more Interesting figure than his sister,
though she has the place of honour, but the whole thing is so
nicely balanced, both as a picture and as a family record, that it
would be difficult to find a better exemple of what a family picture
ought to be. One would like to have had Garrick's opinion
upon it.
Another delightful group of the Sitwell family, which I have
very kindly been allowed to reproduce, is the silhouette opposite
page 68. This, I am informed, bears an unmistakable resemblance
in some of its details to a similar group that was reproduced in The
Girls' Realm in June 1899, as the work of an artist named Thonard,
who lived at 18 Wells Street, taught drawing, and took likenesses,
"singly and In groups, in the genteelest taste." His technique —
meccanismo would be a fitter term, as he is supposed to have used
some kind of machine — was to trace real shadows, and afterwards
reduce and compose them into groups.
Copley's picture of the three youngest daughters of George III.,
which is now at Buckingham Palace, is still more brilliant than that
of the Sitwell children. For Copley was certainly not the sort of
man to let Royalty interfere with youth, and though the picture
was to be something more than an ordinary family portrait, the
first thing the artist evidently did was to make friends with the
children, even if, as is recorded, he wearied the attendants, the dogs,
and even the parrot, with the extraordinary pains he took in
painting the picture. The youngest, about two years old— this

70 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
picture was also painted in 1785 — is seated in what Mr. Lionel
Cust rather timidly describes as " a wooden chair or go-cart,"
but which is evidently the forerunner of what is now vulgarly
known as a "pram," a stout wooden contrivance on four wheels,
drawn by a handle like a bath chair, and large and substantial
enough for the second sister to perch herself somehow on the back
of it behind the hood. The eldest girl is holding the handle with
her right hand, while in her left she brandishes a tambourine, turning
towards the baby ; so that the whole composition is a sort of trium
phal procession about to start; and the rowdy-dow is accentuated by
the enjoyment of the three dogs. If I have rather elaborated the
descriptions of this and the Sitwell picture, it is because it seems
to me that the significance of the various figures in these composi
tions of Copley's, which proves to be the most important factor in
their success. Is apt to be overlooked; for In the "Old Masters"
catalogue the two principal figures in the Sitwell pictures are actually
described as seated, while even Mr. Cust speaks of the Princess Sophia
as standing behind her infant sister, whereas it is quite evident that
she is seated on the back of the cart — unless indeed she Is standing
on one leg — and the way she is brought into relation with the baby
is not only very happy in itself, but adds prodigiously to the vivacity
of the whole group.
About Zoffany and his conversation pieces there is less need to
particularise, as his name is already so familiar — if only from Gilbert's
Immortal couplet In the Major-General's song —
" I can tell a genuine Raphael from Gerard Dow's or Zoffany's.
I know the Croaking Chorus from the « Frogs ' of Aristophanes,"
while his pictures are fetching higher and higher prices when they
come up at Christie's. He is better known, in fact, as a painter of
conversation pieces — whether an English drawing-room, a cock-fight
at Lucknow, or the Tribuna at Florence — than of anything else.
That he was not an Englishman gives his work the greater value,
as all Englishmen seem to have been ashamed of painting their
surroundings as they actually were, and the work of Laroon, Mercier,
Gravelot, Boitard, or Copley, who, coming fresh to these barbarous

Children of George III. By J. S. Copley. Buckingham Palace. From a photograph by IV. E. Gray.

THE CLOSE OF THE CENTURT 71
shores, were so struck with the na'ive simplicity of English life that
their renderings of It exactly as it appeared to them, are far more
convincing in their actual representation than those of Reynolds, or
even Hogarth.
To Zoffany, the prim English parlour must have seemed fasci-
naring, and he paints It with a zest that is entirely absent from
the efforts of Augustus Egg, or of the pre-Raphaellte younger-
brotherhood, who merely used it as a background for some senti
mental vapouring, which at the moment, perhaps, may have passed
for inspiration, and has now a certain charm that we miss in the
glare of the modern competition for sensationalism. For Zoffany,
the parlour was something more than a background ; it was a
machine that contained the people he was painting; and it not only
contained them, but it also summed them up. It was the same
with the drawing-room — save that there was, as might be supposed,
less of the machine about It than the setting for a somewhat grander
scene ; but the point is the same — his people occupy the room they
happen to be in, with precisely the air of being discovered there
without knowing it, and, consequently, without any appearance of
having been arranged into a lively but artificially natural group
such as we have seen in the works of Hogarth and Copley.
How true this is, if indeed any one doubted it, is evident when
one sees how little, in effect, Zoffany's pictures lose by repro
duction. Of all the illustrations here given, there are few as
successful as these two of Zoffany's, and of the two It will hardly
be guessed which was photographed with every modern appliance
during the present year, and which with the Imperfect apparatus
of exactly forty years ago. Both are life-like representations of
what was going on in a room at a particular moment ; and while
Hogarth could hardly conceal a certain skill and sometimes a
kind of bravado in disregarding the pompous conventionalities,
and while Reynolds must cast his eyes up to Heaven, or invoke
the spirit of Paul Veronese, before he could do justice to the
nobility or the charm of his illustrious sitters, this cold-blooded
but skilful foreigner depicted the familiar life of this great nation's
nobles with as much unconcern as If they were so many trades-

72 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
men and their families whom he was observing unperceived through
the keyhole.
How successful, and indeed how charming, Zoffany could be
may be seen ftom the examples here given, which are from pictures
belonging to the Countess Cowper and Lord Sherborne respectively.
In the former we see George, third Earl Cowper, and his Countess,
Mr. and Mrs. Gore and the two Misses Gore, as naturally grouped
as though Zoffany had simply reproduced a kodak snapshot taken
in passing the window, out of which one of the younger ladies,
not being engaged in the concert, and tiring for the moment of
her book, has happened to catch sight of him as she looks up.
The other, if it is by comparison a little less spontaneous in
effect than the first. Is still extraordinarily natural and unaffected.
It represents James Lennox Naper (afterwards Dutton) and his
second wife Jane, daughter of Christopher Bond, their son James,
first Lord Sherborne, and their daughter Jane Mary, who married
Thomas Coke, first Earl of Leicester. No wonder that pictures
like this were not only popular, but even acceptable to the fastidious
Walpole..,. "I dined to-day at the ^exhibition of pictures with the
Royal Academicians," he writes to Sir Horace Mann, on 22nd April
1775. "We do not beat Titian or Guido yet. Zoffany has sent
over a wretched Holy Family. He is the Hogarth of Dutch
painting, but no more than Hogarth can shine out of his own way.
He might have drawn the Holy Family if he had seen them in
statu quo.'' In criticising the Tribuna picture, again, he concludes :
" However, it is a great and curious work, and Zoffany might have
been better employed. His talent Is representing natural humour ;
I look upon him as a Dutch painter polished and civilised. He
finishes as highly, and renders nature as justly, and does not degrade
it as the Flemish school did. . . ."
Of the sporting proclivities of the EngUsh in this century there are
fewer examples in contemporary art than might be supposed, and such
as there are can hardly be regarded as generally illustrative of Society,
but are rather interesting in their respective departments of sports.
Cricket, as we have seen, was depicted by Hayman, and skating
by Julius Caesar Ibbetson, a painter who came within measurable dis-

A Family Group. From tlie painting by Zoffany. Lord Sherborne.

A Family Party. From the painting hy Zoffany. Counhss Cozvpa:

A Country Race Course. From an engraving after IV. Mason,

Cricket. From an engraving by Benoist after ihe painling by F. Hayman.

Skating. From a print ajter the painting by J. C. Ibbetson.

THE CLOSE OF THE CENTURT 73
tance of Richard Wilson in landscape, and quite equalled Morland In
depicring rural life. Sartorius is a name familiar to lovers of racing,
as well as Wootton. The example selected in this chapter, by William
Mason, is one of a pair of engravings that are not very widely
known; and, another by the same hand, the subject of which is a
coach being driven through the high street of a county town, is
quite as rare. All three of these are of a quality and spirit that
excite some surprise at Mason's name not being better known, and
if the sporting faternity were not so easily pleased with the repro
ductions of ridiculous coaching and racing prints of the early
nineteenth century that now fetch such high prices, It is possible
that his work might have a little more of the recognition it
undoubtedly deserves.
Equestrian portraits were so rarely painted, and so pompously, that
the work of George Stubbs is more than usually interesting, especially
when It happens to be a conversation piece — or at least a family group
— as well as the mere delineation of a horse. One of his most
charming pictures is that of Josiah Wedgwood and his family, painted
in 1780, now in the possession of Mr. Cecil Wedgwood, who has
kindly allowed it to be reproduced. The scene Is Etruria Hall, and
in the distance may be seen the smoke of the pottery, while at Josiah's
elbow is a specimen of its production. The children are Susannah
(Mrs. R. W. Darwin), John, Josiah, Tom, Kitty, Marianne, and
Sarah — the last-named being the child by the go-cart, who was so
little satisfied with her likeness that for many years she had the picture
turned with its face to the wall.
Another of Stubbs' family pieces, that of Lord Hchester, Mr.
Digby, and Mr. James, who are represented as resting during the
enjoyment of partridge-shooting, was exhibited with the National
Portraits in 1867 ; while in the following year were shown two more
which he painted for the Duke of Richmond, the one a shooting
party with Lord Holland, Lord Albemarle, and others, the other of
the Duchess of Richmond and Lady Louisa Lennox on horseback
watching a string of racehorses training. These were painted in
1760, and in 1762 he also did a large picture of Lord Albemarle
embarking to the Havana expedition ; and In the same year a picture

74 ENGLISH SOCIETT OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURT
at Eaton called " The Grosvenor Hunt," with portraits of Lord
Grosvenor, his brother Thomas Grosvenor, Sir Roger Mostyn, and
others. His chief occupation, however, was in painting horses, before
he devoted himself to the publication of " The Anatomy of the
Horse," and his price for an equine portrait was no less than a
hundred guineas. A very charming subject, entitled " Refreshment
at St. James'," by Charles Ansell, was engraved by his son, George
Townley Stubbs, In 1789.
Even to mention all of the charming illustrators of various social
scenes at the close of the century is hardly possible in so slight a
sketch as this must necessarily be, and the examples by Dighton,
Russell, M. Haughton, and Edward Dayes which have been selected
for reproduction are but a bare Indication of the sort of work that was
now being accomplished by artists whose names are comparatively
unknown ; but to Rowlandson, of all his contemporaries, it is only just
to pay some passing tribute In taking leave of our subject ; for while
our two illustrations, taken from a print and a drawing kindly lent
by Mr. G. Harland Peck, certainly show him at his best, it would
require not two only but a couple of score to give any adequate
idea of how wide a field his " best " covered, when he was giving
free expression to his wonderful feeling for all he saw around him,
and was not working simply for the publisher. His pen never
seemed to tire — a reed pen, whose outlines were filled in with
the most delicate washes of yellow, pink and blue, that the modern
water-colourlst seems to know nothing about — and we can follow
him as he flits like a bee over the garden of rural England, lighting
on a hundred little wild-flowers of country life, that, but for him,
we should never have noticed. To the general public, indeed,
Rowlandson's work as a caricaturist is too well known to be very
dear, and his political and social broad-sheets, though they earned
him enough money and fame in the coarse clamour of the Regency,
have considerably effaced his real talent for depicting everyday life
with a charm and naturalness that have hardly been equalled by any
English artist, not even forgetting Gainsborough and Morland.
Much of his work belongs, of course, to the nineteenth century,
and his Influence on coloured Illustration, so industriously fostered

The Family of Josiah Wedgwood. From the painting by George Stubbs. Cecil Wedgwood, Esq.

Spring Gardens. From

a water-colour drawing by T. Ro-wlandson. G. Harland Peek, Esq.

THE CLOSE OF THE CENTURT 75
by Ackerman, has been well demonstrated in Mr. Mardn Hardie's
recent book ; but of his earlier work, and especially that portion of
it which was purely spontaneous, the collector alone knows anything.
As it is, the nation may be content that some half-dozen — and
those by no means of the best — of his sketches are to be seen at
the South Kensington Museum, and can hardly grumble at his name
being unknown at the National Gallery. Were it probable, or even
possible, that another benefactor like Mr. Tate should realise how
his countrymen appreciate a gift, or even enjoy a legacy, he could
find fewer objects that would yield more agreeably surprising results
than the formation of a public gallery of paintings and drawings
by minor English artists. Over its portico might be Inscribed the
stanza from Roubiliac's poem above quoted : —
" Ne peus-tu pas, en admirant
Les Maitres de la Grece et ceux de P Italic,
Rendre justice egalement
A ceux qu'a nourris ta Patrie ? "

INDEX

Addison, Joseph, i, 4, 20
Angelis, Peter, 2
Angelo, 42, 43
Anne, Queen, i, 4, 6
Ansell, Charles, 74
Bartolozzi, Francesco, 59, 63
Beatson, Nelly, 64, 65
Beaufort, Duke of, 15
Beechey, Sir William,
"Beggar's Opera," 17-19, 20
Benoist, A., 27, 36
Boit, Charles, 5, 6
Boitard, Louis Peter, 31, 32, 33, 70
Bolingbroke, Viscount, 13
Boyne, Viscount, 25
Bridgwater, Lady, 12
Bunbury, Henry William, 60
Burney, Charlotte, 62
 Edward, 62
 Fanny, 55, 61-64
Canaletto, Antonio, 31, 32
Cardigan, Lord. See Montagu, Duke of
Carhsle House, 55
Chardin, Jean Simeon, 27, 38
Chesterfield, Earl of, 21
Cibber, Colley, 21
Cipriani, Giovanni Battista, 63
Clogher, Bishop of, 14
Collett, John, 53
Copley, John Singleton, 59, 65, 70
Cornelys, Mrs., 55, 56, 57
Cosway, Richard, 60
" Cowper Family " (Zoffany's), 72
Cremorne Gardens, 30
Crisp, Samuel, 61
Cunningham, Allan, 47, 48, 63
Defoe, Daniel, 4
Downman, John, 60
Eugene, Prince, 6
"Evelina," 29, 61, 62, 63

Faber, John, the younger, 26, 37
Fielding, Henry, 20
Fountaine, Sir Andrew, 24
Frederick, Prince of Wales, 37
Gainsborough, Thomas, 40-47, 59, 74
Garrick, David, 47, 48
George, Prince, of Denmark, 6
George I., 11
 II-. 32,33
 Ill-, 31,36,37
Gilray, James, 60
Goldar, John, 53
Goldsmith, Oliver, 51, 52
Gonson, Sir John, 21
Grafton, Duke of, 33
Grantham, Lord, 33
Gravelot, Hubert Frangois, 35, 41, 70
Grignon, Charles, 28
Hals, Franz, 67
Hamilton, Lady, 60
Hampton Court, i, 33, 35
Harley, Edward, second Earl of Oxford, I
Hayman, Francis, 28, 33, 41, 72
Haywood, Mrs., 4
Hell Fire Club, 2, 3
Hervey, Lord, 33
Higgins, Mrs., 14
Highmore, Joseph, 27, 33, 36
Hogarth, William, 20-26, 33, 59, 71
Holbein, 67
Hoppner, John, 60
Hudson, Thomas, 26, 44
Hyde, Catherine, 12
Hyde Park, 9
Ibbetson, Julius Csesar, 72
Jervas, Charles, 11, 12, 26
Johnson, Dr., 9, 12, 63
Jones Collection, 36

n

78

INDEX

Kauffmann, Angelica, 63
Knapton, George, 44
Kneller, Sir Godfrey, 4, 6, 11, 13
Laguerre, 6
Laroon, Marcellus, 6, 7, 70
 the younger, 6, 34
Liotard, John Stephen, 26
Lovat, Lord, 23
Mall, The, 9
Malone, Edmund, 42
Manley, Mrs., 4
Maratti, Carlo, 12
Marlborough, Duke of, I, 2, 39
 Duchess of, I, 2, 13
Masham, Lady, 13, 14
Mason, William, 73
Mercier, Philip, 37, 38, 44, 70
Montagu, Duke of, 34
Montagu House, 34, 35
Morland, George, 60, 73, 74
Mortimer, John Hamilton, 63
Nelson, Lord, 60
Nichols, John, 21-23
Oakley, Sir Charles, 65
Orkney, Countess of, 13
Ormond, Duke of, 6, 13, 14
 Duchess, 13, 14
"Pamela," 27, 28, 36, 61
Parr, R., 28
Pepys, Samuel, 30
Plimer, Andrew, 60
"Polite Conversations," 15-17
Pope, Alexander, 20
Pratt, Dr., 14
Prior, Matthew, 14
QuiN, James, 42
Raeburn, Sir Henry, 60
Ramsay, Allan, 45

Ranelagh, 31, 32, 49, 51
Reid, Catherine, 64, 65
Reynolds, Sir Joshua, 26, 40, 59, 63, 71
Richardson, Jonathan, 26
 Samuel, 26
Rimbault, Dr., 56
Romney, George, 47, 59, 60
Roubiliac, L. F., 41, 75
Rowlandson, Thomas, 60, 74
Russell, John, 60
Sartorius, 73
Satirical Prints, 2, 3, 31
Saussure, Caesar de, 7, 8, 9, 10
Simon, John, 37
"Sitwell Family" (Copley's), 66-68
Smith, John Raphael, 54, 55, 58
Steele, Richard, i, 4, 20
" Stella, Journal to," 13, 14, 15
Strode Family, 23
Stubbs, George, 73
Swift, Dean, i, 12, 13, 14
Tempest, Pierce, 7
Thames, the, 9
Thonard, 69
Tillemans, Peter, 2
Truchy, L., 27, 28, 36
Vanloo, John Baptist, 26, 34
Vauxhall Gardens, 30, 49, 51
Vertue, George, 31, 38, 44
Walpole, Horace, i, 4, 11, 26, 28, 32, 45,
49,55
Watteau, Antoine, i
Wharton, Duke of, 35
Wheatley, Francis, 60
Wild, Jonathan, 17
Wootton, John, 73
Yarmouth, Lady, 32
Zoffany, John, 22, 66, 70-72

Printed by Ballantyne, Hanson &= Co.
Edinburgh &• London

THE PORTFOLIO MONOGRAPHS, No. 47
With Four Illustrations in Colours and Gold, and many others.
Price 51. netf, or in cloth is. nett.
THE TOWER OF LONDON
By the Rev. CANON BENHAM, D.D., F.S.A.
Author of " Mediisval London," " Old St. PauVs Cathedral," b^c.
THE Tower of London is the most interesting fortress in Great Britain ; it has a
history equalled in interest by few fortresses in the world. The Acropolis at
Athens and the Capitol at Rome are far more ancient, but they are fortresses no
longer. " The only rival in this respect that occurs to me," says Canon Benham, "is
the massive tower at the Western Gate of Jerusalem. It was probably built by king
David, and enlarged by Herod, and it is a military castle at this day. So is our
Tower, and it was built for that use."
Of the buildings of the Tower, and of the . additions made by successive Kings,
Canon Benham's monograph gives a detailed account ; and he tells also the story of
the events which have happened within its walls, linking it so closely with the history
of England, the scenes of chivalry and tragedy for ever associated with the great
fortress, palace, and prison.
PLATES IN COLOURS AND GOLD
From MSS. at the British Museum
The Tower of London. From the Poems of Charles, Duke of Orleans. ;
A Tournament. From the Romance of the Sire Jehan de Saintre.
An Assault on a Fortress. From Boccaccio de Casibus Virorum et Foeminarum illustrium.
Artillery of the Fifteenth Century. From " The Chronicles of England," Vol. IIL
OTHER ILLUSTRATIONS

Vaulted Room in the White Tower, in which the
Rack stood.
A Cell in the Bloody Tower. J. Wykeham
Archer.
Building a Gateway. From a MS. of Le Tresor
des Histoires.
Men-at-Arms Crossing a Drawbridge. From a
MS. of Les Chroniques d'Angleterre.
The Prisoners' Walk. C. J. Richardson.
The Wakefield Tower. C. Tomkins.
Traitor's Gate, from without. C. TOMKINS.
Traitor's Gate, from within. From an old en
graving.
The Collegiate Church of St. Katherine, looking
west. J. Carter.
The Gothic Altarpiece in the Collegiate Church
of St. Katherine. B. T. PouNCEY.
A Room in the Beauchamp Tower, with Prisoners'
Inscriptions on the Walls.
Banquet given by Richard II. From a MS. of
" The Chronicles of England."
An Act of Arms before the King and Queen.
From a MS. of the Romance of the Sire
Jehan de Saintr^.
Queen in a Horse Litter, attended by her Ladies
on Horseback. From a MS. of Froissart's
Chronicles.

The Tower and Old London Bridge. J. Maurer.
The Tower, from the Thames. E. Duncan.
The Moat. J. Maurer.
Gateway of the Bloody Tower. F. Nash.
The City Barges at the Tower Stairs. W.
Parrott.
South Aisle of St. John's Chapel. J. Wykeham
Archer.
Staircase of the White Tower. J. Wykeham
Archer.
The Salt Tower, and part of the Ancient Ballium.
J. Wykeham Archer.
The Tower and Mint, from Tower Hill. T. S.
Boys.
The Execution of the Earl of Strafford. Hollar.
The Seven Bishops taken to the Tower. From a
Dutch etching of the time.
Indian Elephant and Rhinoceros brought over in
1686. P. Vander Berge.
Lions' Dens in the Tower. From a Drawing
made in 1779.
The Beauchamp Tower, and St. Peter's Chapel.
P. Justyne.
The Governor's House. C. J. Richardson.
The Tower, showing the East Outer Ballium.
H. Hodge.
A Plan of the Tower. Drawn about 1861.

London: SEELEY &' CO. LIMITED, 38 Great Russell Street
1

THE PORTFOLIO MONOGRAPHS, No. 46
With 4 Illuminations in Colours and Gold, and 33 other Illustrations.
Sewed, 55. nett, or in cloth, gilt top, is. nett.
THE CATHEDRAL
BUILDERS IN ENGLAND
By EDWARD S. PRIOR, M.A., F.S.A.
Author of " A History of Gothic Art in England," ifc.
In this volume Mr. Prior treats of the Great English Mediaeval Cathedrals, with
special reference to the men by whom they were designed, and the craftsmen by
whom they were erected. He thus characterises the successive periods of Cathedral
building in England : —
I. Norman, Benedictine, "Romanesque."
2. Angevin, Neomonastic, " Transitional to Gothic."
3. Insular, Episcopal, " Early English."
4. Continental, Regal, " The Summit of Gothic.''
5. English, Aristocratic, " Decorated."
6. After the Black Death : Official, " Perpendicular."
7. Fifteenth Century : Parochial and Trading, " Perpendicular."
8. Sixteenth to Eighteenth Centuries : the Craftsman and the Architect.
9. Nineteenth Century : the Restorer and Revivalist.
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Miniatures from Illuminated MSS. in the British Museum, printed in Colours.
Christ in Glory. From a Missal oi\h& Fourteenth Century.
The Angels with the Seven Vials. From an Apocalypse of the Fourteenth Century.
Bishop carrying the Sacrament. From a Lectionary of the Fifteenth Century.
Group of Bishops. From a Psalter of the Fifteenth Century.
Other Illustrations

Westminster Abbey, Confessor's Chapel. BoYCE.
Westminster Abbey, N. Ambulatory. Nash.
Canterbury Cathedral, from the S. Hollar.
Durham Cathedral, from the River. Daniell.
Durham Cathedral, from the West. Cotman.
Winchester Cathedral, N. Transept. Blore.
Norwich Cathedral, Nave. F. Mackenzie.
Canterbury Cathedral, N. Aisle of Choir. G.
Cattermole.
Wells Cathedral, Arches under the Central
Tower. Garland.
Wells Cathedral, N.W. Tower. J. H. GiBBONS.
Chichester Cathedral, S.E. View. Garland.
Southwark Cathedral, Nave. DiBDEN.
Salisbury Cathedral, Small Transept. F.
Mackenzie.
York Minster, from the North. Ed. Blore.
York Minster, North Transept. Garland.
Lincoln Cathedral, from the West. De Wint.
Lincoln Cathedral, the Chancel. Garland.

Lincoln Cathedral, from the East. Hollar.
Salisbury Cathedral, the Chapter House. F.
Mackenzie.
Salisbury Cathedral, from Cloisters. Turner.
Exeter Cathedral, from the S.E. S. Rayner.
Ely Cathedral, the Octagon. Garland.
Gloucester Cathedral, Presbytery. J. Harold
Gibbons.
Gloucester Cathedral, Cloisters. Garland.
York Minster, East End. E. Mackenzie.
Winchester Cathedral, West Front. Garland.
York Minster, Choir. F. Mackenzie.
Sherborne Minster. Constable.
St. George's Chapel, Windsor, from S. Hollar.
St. George's Chapel, Windsor, Interior of Choir.
Hollar.
St. Paul's Cathedral, West Front. T. Malton.
St. Paul's Cathedral, Interior of Choir. R.
Trevitt.
Truro Cathedral, from the South-East.

"It is satisfactory to find the subject approached after a masterly and in many respects an original
fashion. This book is brightened by various able reproductions of some of the best old engravings of
England's minsters." — Athenaum.
" To not a few every page will be a delight." — Church Times.
London: SEELEY 6- CO. LIMITED, 38 Great Russell Street
2

!

-.-yri!**

\m

If. •

1 ,» • ¦
< .'(ft j'j