YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Gift at George H. Nett let on Ki&B *-.:%-'' AN ILLUSTRATED HISTORY or THE HOLT BIBLE: BEING A CONNECTED ACCOUNT OF THE EEMAEKABLE EVENTS AND DISTINGUISHED CHAEACTEES CONTAINED IN THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS, AND IN Jewish History during the Four Hundred Years INTERVENING BETWEEN THE TIME OF MALACHI AND THE BIKTH OF CHEIST, INCLUDING ALSO THE LIFE OF CHEIST AND HIS APOSTLES: THE WHOLE EMBRACING A PERIOD OF FOUR THOUSAND YEARS, WITH NOTES CRITICAL, TOPOGRAPHICAL AND EXPLANATORY, TOGETHER WITH CHRONOLOGICAL AND OTHER VALUABLE TABLES. BY JOHN KITTO, D.D., F.S.A., OR OF "CYCLOPEDIA OF BIBLICAL LITEB ATUEE, " "HISTOEY OF PALESTINE," EDITED BT ALVAN BOND, D.D., Formerly Professor of Biblical Literature in the Theological Seminary at Bangor, Me., and for more than twenty years Pastor ofthe Second Congregational Church, Norwich, Conn. EMBELLISHED AND ILLUSTEATED BY OVER 100 FULL-PAGE ENGRAVINGS AND MAPS. NORWICH, CONN. PUBLISHED BY HENRY BILL. 1868. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1S67. By HENRY BILL, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States for tho District of Connecticut, Printed by Geo. C. Rand & Avery, Boston. P E E F A C E. " Bible History," says Dr. Lange, " differs from the general history of the kingdom of God, in that it delineates only the foundation of this kingdom by means of and during the course of revelation: It traces, in historical succession, the narrative contained in the Scriptures in all its essential features. In the Old Testament it shows us all the elements of the life of faith, and sets before us many a precious example of faith and patience for our imitation ; while in the New Testament it exhibits the history of faith and salvation ' made perfect,' both in the miracles and triumphs ofthe Lord, and in the deeds of His apostles. Thus Bible history forms the basis of Church history." As a department of useful knowledge, it possesses an intrinsic value and in terest, surpassing whatever can be claimed for any other history. It covers a1 long period in the age of human society, whose chronicles, in an authentic form, have been nowhere else preserved. It runs back to the eventful epoch whence the creation of the world, in its present organic state, dates its existence ; and furnishes the only reliable record of the origin of man, of his primitive condi tion, his fall, his subsequent development, and the fortunes of his family. Biblical history is the source of all we know of the antediluvian period, and subsequent ages of the world down to the time of Herodotus, the father of his tory. It contains the only truthful account of the ancient and long since vanished civilizations. Herodotus was a contemporary of Ezra and Nehemiah, the last of the Old Testament historians. The antediluvian period, and that intervening between the Noachian deluge and the times of Nehemiah, embrace an era 01 about three thousand five hundred years, the history of which is nowhere found but in the Old Testament. True, there are fabulous legends and cosmogonies in which may be found a confused intermingling of traditional lore and the in ventions of the imagination, but they are wanting in all the essential elements of authentic history. It has been said by Dr. Kitto, that " Amidst the various profane authors who have written more or less in detail on Egypt, the Bible remains our best and fullest authority for the early history of this country. * * * * The Bible supplies, either by express statement or obvious implication, facts and principles which constitute genuine history, and go far to give the past all the value which it can possess for the men of these times. The history of the pre-Christian era embraces, 1. The primeval ages till the deluge, and the re-settlement of Noah aud his family in Armenia. . 2. The dis persion of the posterity of Noah's three sons till the calling of Abraham. 3. The origin and establishment of the Hebrew Theocracy, and its relations to the ancient empires of the world, comprising the period from Moses to David — the period of the kings from David to the Babylonian exile— the period of sacer dotal rule under the Maccabeean administration, or what is called the middle period. 4. Primitive Christianity to the close of the first century. Thus surveyed, it appears that Biblical history covers a period of four thou sand years — from the morning of creation. to the establishment of Christianity in all parts of the Roman empire. When considered in respect to the infallible sources whence it is derived, and the long flight of ages which it embraces, it ¦ must be regarded as possessing the highest claims to our careful study. v PREFACE. " Viewed merely as a literary production, the Bible," says the able and learned editor of Dr. Lange's Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, " is a marvellous book, and without a rival. All the libraries of theology, philosophy, history, antiquities, poetry, law, and policy would not furnish material enough for so rich a treasure of the choicest gems of human genius, wisdom, and experience. It embraces works of about forty authors, representing the extremes of society, from the throne of the king to the boat of the fisherman ; it was written during a long period of sixteen centuries, on the banks of the Nile, in the desert of Arabia, in the land of promise, in Asia Minor, in classical Greece, and in im perial Rome ; it commences with the creation, and ends with the final glorifica tion, after describing all the intervening stages in the revelation of God and the spiritual development of man ; it uses all forms of literary composition ; it rises to the highest heights, and descends to the lowest depths of humanity ; it measures all states and conditions of life ; it is acquainted with every grief and every woe; it touches every chord of sympathy; it contains the spiritual biography of every human heart ; it is suited to every class oi society, and can be read with the same interest and profit by the king and the beggar, by the philosopher and the child ; it is as universal as the race, and reaches beyond the limits of time into the boundless regions of eternity." * The Illustrated History of the Bible is to be accredited to the labors of Kitto, who has contributed several valuable and voluminous works to the cause of biblical learning. For the numerous notes introduced, recourse has been had to the most reliable authors, and especially to the later researches in the depart ment of sacred literature. As some readers may be interested in a brief biographical notice of the distinguished Christian scholar referred to above, the following is here inserted. John Kitto was born in Plymouth, England, Dec. 4, 1804. His father was a common laborer, in humble circumstances. Being addicted to intemperance, he squandered his earnings in ale-houses, and his family was subjected to poverty and mortification. His son, John, was consequently removed to the home of his maternal grandmother, where he was tenderly cared for and instructed. Very early he manifested a strong desire for knowledge, and sought the society of those who would entertain him with stories or loan him books. In his grandmother's library he found a family Bible, containing many pictorial illustrations of scenes in sacred history, which afforded him much pleasure, and induced him to read the Scriptures. The course of an eventftC life is not unfrequently shaped by some single incident in the experience of childhood. In the case of Kitto, it is very evident that there was a connection between his interest in the old family Bible, with its pictures, and his subse quent fondness for Biblical studies. When he was ten years old, he was brought back to the parental home ; his father, a journeyman mason, required John to assist him. In the mean time, he improved every leisure day and hour in reading such hooks as he could find or borrow. While other boys were at play, he was reading. In the year 1817, the thirteenth of his age, young Ki$to suffered an injury which cast a disheartening cloud over his future prospects. He was employed iu carrying slates to the roof of a house which his father was repairing when stepping from the ladder to the roof, his foot slipped, and he fell to the pave ment below. He was conveyed in a senseless state to his home, and for two •weeks there seemed to be but little hope of his recovery. At the expiration PREFACE. * of this time he opened his eyes and consciousness returned. His first thoughts were directed to his books, his mind reverting to the subject with which it was occupied at the time of the casualty. He seemed greatly surprised to find him self weak and helpless. As yet he was not aware that, in consequence of the injury he had received, he had become entirely deaf. On inquiring for a book which he was reading just before he fell, he heard no answer. "Why do you not speak?" he asked with some impatience. The painful information was given to him, in writing, that he was deaf. The fact of his deafness, depressing as it was, and unfitting him as it did for most kinds of business, did not extinguish his thirst for knowledge. He resorted to a variety of resources and expedients for earning small sums of money, which he expended in the purchase of cheap books. But his scanty earnings were not sufficient for the purchase of such books as he now craved, and for procuring food and clothing, which his parents in their poverty could no longer provide for him. Consequently, in the fifteenth year of his age, the poor deaf boy was sent to the poor-house. This stern, humiliating necessity seemed intolerable to his noble and sensitive spirit. After a while, however, he became resigned to this hard lot, and conducted himself in a manner that won the sympathy and kindness of the overseer. In the latter part of the year 1821, John Kitto was apprenticed to a shoe maker, who proved to be an unreasonable and cruel master. But in these circumstances, trying as they were, and though required to work sixteen or eighteen hours a day, he redeemed time from sleep for the pursuit of knowledge. His was a mind that rose above the pressure of the most depressing adversity. The promising abilities of this unfortunate youth were at last brought to the notice of several gentlemen in Plymouth. Measures were proposed by them in 1823, with a view to procuring for him a situation favorable to the attainment of that knowledge and culture on which ho was so intent. As the result of these humane efforts, he was removed from the work-house to the position of sub-librarian in the Plymouth Public Library. Having triumphed over discouragements and difficulties which would have utterly disheartened a less brave and resolute spirit, he found himself on the upward career of success ful literary culture and achievement. Two grand ideas now impressed and affected his mind, viz.: that he must make himself, and that usefulness should be the ruling purpose in the prosecu tion of his literary labors and attainments. The eventful history of his life affords abundant evidence that these noble ideas were not theoretical elements, but practical forces, the influence of which was signally manifested in the strength and affluence of a cultivated intellect, and in the widely appreciated usefulness resulting from his manifold and elaborate contributions to the department of Biblical learning. There were other elements of character which contributed to his masterly activity and signal success. These were singleness of aim, thoroughness of execution, rigid system, personal independence, and strong faith in God. The friends of Kitto advised him to engage in the work of a printing-office, for the purpose of qualifying himself to superintend a mission press. He did so, and in 1827 he received from the Church Missionary Society the appoint ment of lay missionary. In this capacity he sailed for the Island of Malta. where he engaged in the department of labor for which he had been set apart. vi PREFACE. On finding that his work was less favorable to intellectual and spiritual growth than he had expected, he resigned the situation. As a missionary company was about to be sent to Bagdad, he readily accepted an invitation to join the same. The voyage to that oriental city occupied six months, which time he improved in careful observations on men, customs, aud places. While residing in that city, it was visited by the plague, the terrific ravages of which swept off more than one-half the inhabitants in two months. Amidst this fearful desolation he remained calm and active at his post. His connection with this mission continued about three and a half years. On returning to England, he settled near London, and engaged in literary pursuits. About this time he was married to a very excellent woman, who aided him in his labors. His first work was a book of travels in the East. Soon he commenced his great work, the "Pictorial Bible," in three volumes. His "Pictorial History of Palestine and the Holy Land" followed. Then another great work, the " The Cyclopaedia of Biblical Literature," was published in two very large volumes. Another work was the "Gallery of Scripture Engravings and Landscape," in three volumes. Among his last productions may be mentioned the " Daily Bible Illustrations," in two series of four volumes each, designed for morning and evening reading. Other works, besides numer ous contributions to magazines, were among his literary productions. They have, as a whole, greatly enriched the department of Biblical Literature, and been regarded as valuable helps in the explanation and illustration of the Sacred Scriptures. Their acknowledged value has secured for them a wide circulation among Bible students in England and in our own country. The religious change in the experience of Dr. Kitto, which occurred at the age of twenty-two, is referred to by him in a manner showing that it was deep and thorough. He speaks of it as the rising of "the day-spring from on high" upon his soul, through the grace of God. His intense and unremitting application to literary labors impaired his health, so that, when fifty years of age, he was compelled to suspend his labors, and resort to measures for recruiting his overtasked constitution. He visited Germany for this purpose, but without any benefit. He rapidly declined, and died at Caanstadt, near Stuttgardt. His wife, who was with him, has furnished a beautiful record of his last days, which shows that his end was peace. It has been the special care of the editor, in preparing this work, to verify references, to review, and, in some instances, revise the marginal notes, and to eliminate doubtful and irrelevant matter. As an humble contribution to the department of Bible history, this work is offered to Christian readers, and espe- sially to the young, with the prayer and the hope that it may not only contrib ute something towards a popular and attractive illustration of the Historical Scriptures, but create an increased interest in the sacred book given of God for the edification, enlightenment, and spiritual benefit of all nations and all ages. Nokwich. Conn., May, 1866. A._ B_ SfOTE BY THE PUBLISHER. In order to prevent any misapprehension which may arise, from finding in the community an occasional copy of a book similar to this it is due to the public to Btate, that an edition of Dr. Kitto's work with some alterations and additions, has been issued by an American publisher, as his own, omitting the ordinal author's name entirely. Not having, however, a literary reputation sufficient to give it character ft did not attain that wide circulation which its intrinsic value warrants. The present publisher has, therefore, restored Dr. Kitto's name, and offers the work in a much more attractive form. HENKY HILL. TABLE OF CONTENTS. *• » ¦» HISTORIC AND LITERARY INTRODUCTION Authorship of the Bible. The several books. Their divisions. Hebrew manuscripts. The Hebrew language. Integrity of the text. Various readings. Ancient versions. Schism between the Jews ana Samaritans. The Septuagint The Septuagint and Vulgate. Modern foreign versions. Eng lish versions. The Apocrypha. HISTORY OF THE OLD TESTAMENT. CHAPTER I. ,The Creation. The Bible account consistent with Geology. Opinions of distinguished writers. The Firmament Orde*. -«f Crea tion. Adam. Eve. The Seventh "Day. bite of the Garden of Eden. The Tempta tion, The Full, Expulsion from Eden. CHAPTEE II. Birth of Cain and Abel. Their Sacrifices. Murder of Abel. Genealogy of Cain. Birth of Seth. His Posterity. Great depravity of the race. Noah ordered to build the ark. Description of it. The Deluge. Mount Ararat. Noah's intoxication. Ca naan's curse. CHAPTEE III. The Tower of BabeL, Description of Babylon. Language. Its origin. Different dialects. Genealogy of Noah s sons. Countries pos sessed by their descendants. Description of Nineveh. Modern discoveries of its ruins by Botta and Layard. They con firm the prophecies. Important results to Biblical history. The posterity of Shem. Terah, the father of Abraham. His re moval from Ur to Haran, in Mesopotamia. His death. CHAPTEE IV. The call of Abram. Description of Ur. Abram removes, with Lot and Sarai, to the land of Canaan. Description of Canaan. Fam ine. Abram's removal to Egypt He calls his wife his sister. Abram's return to Ca naan. Friendly separation of Abram and Lot. Lot chooses the plain of Sodom and Gomorrah. The Jordan. Abram settles in tbe plain of Mamre. He rescues Lot. Melchiaedek. God's promise to Abram of a numerous posterity. Hagar. Ishmael. Change of name to Abraham. Promise of a son to Sarah. Circumcision. CHAPTEE V. 6odom and Gomorrah. Abraham warned of their destruction. His petitions for their salvation. Lot warned to flee. Lot's wife. Description of the Dead Sea. Destruction of the cities of the plain. "Wickedness of Lot's daughters. Abraham's removal to Gi*rar. His second equivocation in regard to his wife. The TalmuUical story of it Primitive longevity and vigor. Birth of Isaac. Hagar and Ishmael banished. A- nalogy of Hebrew and Dreidical worship. Abraham commanded to sacrifice Isaac. His rescue. Death of Sarah. Her burial 45 in the cave of Machpelah. Marriage of Isaac and Rebecca. Eastern customs, Death of Abraham. Account of the Ish- maelites. 7d CHAPTER VL Birth of Esau and Jacob. Esau sells his birth right. Explanation of the birthright Isaac removes from Beersheba to Gerar. His prosperity. Enmity of the Philistines. Wells. Isaac returns to Beersheba. He calls his wife his sister. Description of Beersheba. Stratagem of Eebecca to ob tain the parental "benediction for Jacob. The EdomiteB. Jacob's departure to find a wife. His dream. Bethel. He meets BO Rachel at the well. He marries Leah and Rachel. Leah's sons. Birth of Joseph. Jacob's prosperity. His flight from La- ban. Labnn's pursuit. Treaty of alliance. Images. List of idols mentioned In Scrip ture. Meeting of Esau and Jacob. Tents- Dinah's disgrace. The revenge of her bro thers. Slaughter of the Shechemites. Jacob's return to Bethel Birth of Benja min, and death of Rachel. Jacob visits his father at Mamre. Death of Isaac. 00 CHAPTER VII. Joseph. Hib parti-colored coat. Eastern fab rics. Jealousy of Joseph's brethren. His two dreams. He is sent to Shechem. De scription of Dothan. Ishmaelites. Midian- ites. Caravans. Account of the com merce of Eastern nations. Joseph sold to the Ishmaelites. The plot to deceive his father. Joseph sold to Potiphar. He is made ehief manager of his master's affairs. His temptation and triumph. His false accusation and imprisonment. His inter pretation of the dreams of the cup-bearer and baker. Pharaoh's dreams. Joseph's interpretation, and his wise advice. His deliverance from prison. He is appointed chief deputy of the king. The Nile. Famine. Visit of Joseph's brethren to E|rypt Joseph discovers himself to them. His father removes to Eeypt Jacob's dying words. His death. He is buried in the cavft of Machpelah. Joseph's death. His character. Ill CHAPTER VIII. Oppression of the Hebrews. Pharaoh's order to drown all their male children. Birth of Moses. He is hiddon in the ark of rushes. t Found, adopted, and educated by the King's daughter. He avenges his breth ren. He flees to Midian— helps the women at the well— is invited to the house of V1U TABLE OF CONTENTS. Jethro — marrieB his daughter, and becomes his shepherd. The Lord appears to him in the burning bush. Commissions him to deliver his people. Aaron accompanies him to Pharaoh. Pharaoh refuses to let the people go. Moses performs a miracle before Pharaoh. The ten plagues. The borrowed jewels. The departure from Egypt The column of fire and cloud. Pursuit of the Egyptians. The Israelites pass the Red Sea. The Egyptians over whelmed. The song of triumph. Egypt- its learning, language, religion, and idola try. CHAPTER IX. Journey of the Israelites. They are miracu lously supplied with quails and manna. The palm-tree. Smiting ofthe rock. De feat of the Amalekites. Mount Sinai.' Giving of the Decalogue. Description of the Tabernacle. The golden calf. Pun ishment of the idolaters. Table of Hebrew months and sacred festivals. The sacri fices explained. Aaron constituted High Priest CHAPTEE X. Census of the people. Plan of the Israelitish encampment - Mode of marching. Mur- murings of the people. Jealousy of Aaron and Miriam against Moses. Miriam pun ished with leprosy. God pardonB and heals her upon the prayer of Moses. Spies are sent to Canaan. The people desire to return to Egypt. Rebellion of Korab, Dathan, and Abiram. They are swallowed up by a miraculous opening of the earth. Death of Miriam at Kadesh. Second smi ting of the rock for water. Death of Aaron. Eleazer, his son, succeeds him in the priesthood. CHAPTER XI. Mount Hor. Murmurings of the people. Pun ishment by fiery serpents. The brazen serpent. Victories over the Ammonites. Balaam is called to curse Israel. He is met in the way by an angel. His ass speaks to him in reproof. Balaam pronounces a bless ing instead of a curse. Israel's idolatry and punishment Successful expedition against the Midianites. Slaughter of five kings. Balaam iB slain. The Israelites draw near to Canaan. The tribes of Reu ben and Gad settle upon the east of Jordan, with the half tribe of Manasseh. Moses appoints the division of Canaan by lot Cities of refuge. Farewelladdress of Moses to the tribes. ITrim and Thummim. Death of Moses. Mount Pisgah, CHAPTEE XII. The Conquest Joshua succeeds Moses. Spies sent' to Jericho. Rahab conceals them. Crossing of the Jordan. Joshua is informed in a vision how to take Jericho. The walls of the city fall down. Description of Jeri cho. Achan's theft. Its consequences. Achan stoned. Capture of Al. Sacrifices and reading of the law upon Mount Ebal, Treaty with the Gideonites. Joshua routs and slays the confederate kings. The sun stands still. The whole country subdued. Dea.u of Joshua and Eleazer. Burial of the bones of Joseph at Shechem. i CHAPTEE XIII. The Hebrews become corrupted by their idola trous neighbors. Idolatry prevails. They are subdued and become tribntary to the king of Mesopotamia. Othniel delivers 130 them. Again subdued by the Moabites. Ehud is their deliverer. Eighty years of rest, e. c. 1426. Story of Ruth. "War with the Canaanites. The great victory of Deb orah and Barak over Sisera. Sisera slain by Ja'el, the wife of Heber. Song of Debo rah. Incursions of the Midianites. Gideon, the deliverer. His great victory with three hundred men. The Israelites offer to make him king. He refuses. His death. 217 CHAPTEE XIV. Abimelech, spurious son of Gideon, murders all his brothers except Jotham. He takes the government He oppresses the people. They expel him. He is killed by a woman. Tola and Jair govern Israel. .Tephtha de feats the Ammonites. Jephtha's vow. He judges Israel sis years, 1247 u. o. Idolatry and subjection of the Israelites. Birth of Samson. His strength. His capture by the Philistines. He carries off the gates of Gaza. He pulls down the temple, and kills great numbers of his enemies, with 166 himself, 1222 b. c. 234 CHAPTEE XV. , Eli. His neglect of family government Pun ishment denounced upon him. The Israel ites defeated by the Philistines. The Ark taken. Death of Eli. Samuel judges Is rael. Israel renounces idolatry. Great victory over the Philistines. Wickedness of Samuel's sons. The people demand a king. Jahn'B estimate of the causes that led the .nation to this demand. Samuel endeavors to dissuade them. Saul the first king. Chosen by lot, 1110 e. o. Jahn's account of the times and the office ofthe judges. 246 CHAPTEE XVI. Saul's reign. His victory over the Ammonites at Jabesh Gilead. He conquers the Ama lekites. His sinful neglect to destroy King Agag and the booty. The prophet Samuel's rebuke of Saul. Samuel anoints David to be king. Saul's mental malady. He is soothed Dy David's harp. "War with the Philistines. Story of David and Goliah. Glory of David. Jealousy of Saul. His efforts to kill David. Friendship of David and Jonathan. Death of Samuel. Saul's continued hostility. David's gener ous forbearance. Saul consults the witch of Endor, and hears his doom. Israel is overcome by the Philistines. Death of Saul's three sons. Saul's suicide. 261 CHAPTEE XVII. David reigns at Hebron. His lamentation over the death of Saul. Wars between the houses of David and Saul. Description of Hebron. Death of Abner. The inaugura tion of David. He takes possession of Mount Zion. He prepares to build a tem ple to Jehovah. His victories over East ern nations. His fall, and his murder of Uriah. The reproof of Nathan, the prophet- The rebellion of Absalom. Battle in the forest of Ephraim. Absalom slain. Absa lom's sepulchre. The famine. Revolt of Adonijah. The anointing of Solomon. David's last counsel to Solomon. Death of David. His burial on Mount Zion. 284 CHAPTEE XVIII. Solomon comes to the throne, 1030 b. o. HIb great wealth and power. Plot of Adonijah to gain the kingdom. Adonijah and Joab are put to death. Solomon marries the daughter of Pharaoh. Building of the TABLE OF CONTENTS. IX Temple on Mount Mortah. Description of it. Solomon's pools. His splendid palaces. Account of the commerce and revenues of his kingdom. Solomon reigns forty years. His death. 817 CHAPTER XIX. Rehoboam succeeds Solomon. Eevolt of the ten tribes under Jeroboam. Judah and Benjamin adhere to Rehoboam. Jeroboam establishes other places of worship besides Jerusalem, aud a new priesthood. Jero boam's death, 96S b. o. He is followed by Nadab, Baasha, Zimri, and Omri. Omri builds Samaria. He dies. 931 b. 0. De scription of Samaria. Judah, from b. c.990 to b. o. 929. Rehoboam soon falls into idolatry. He is con quered, and Jerusalem plundered by Shi- shak, king of Egypt. Rehoboam dies, 973 b. c. Abiiah succeeds him. Asa follows, a pious ami prosperous king. Israel, from b. c. 931 to b.o. 895. Ahab succeeds Omri. Evil influence of Je- zabel. Idolatry becomes prevalent. Eli jah announces famine. He confounds the prophets of Baal, whom the people slay, and acknowledge Jehovah. Great victory of Israel over Ben Hadad. Doom of Ahab pronounced by Elijah. Ahab slain, 909 b. o. Ahaziah. Jehoram. Elisha raises the Shunamite's son. Story of Naaman. Fam ine. Panic and flight of the Syrian host Jehu anointed king by Elisha. Jehoram, Ahaziah, and Jezabel slain. Destruction of the family of Ahab. Jehu destroys the temple of Baal, and roots out idolatry. 337 CHAPTEE XX. >udah, from b. c. 929 to b. o. 725r Jehoshaphat begins to reign, 929 b. a— one of the best of the Hebrew kings. He contin ues to root out idolatry. One million one hundred and sixty thousand men enrolled to bear arms. Judges are placed in all the principal cities. Jehoshaphafs admirable charge to them. Death of Jehoshaphat Jehoranj cmies to the throne, 904 it. o. His wife was Athaliah, daughter of Jezebel. Jehoram murders his six brothers. Idol atry again established. Judgi .*its de nounced by Elisha. Death and disgrace of the king. Ahaziah succeeds to the throne. A bad man. Reigns one year. Athaliah slays all her grandsons except Joash. Joash hidden in the temple. The people rise and slay Athaliah, and make Joash king. Jehoiada, the chief priest, is regent Juash repairs the temple. His apostacy and murder. Amaziah reigns. Victory over the tidomites. He is killed by con spirators, r..c. 809. Uzziah succeeds. He is struck with leprosy. Jotham, his son, administers the government Death of Uzziah. Death of Jotham. Ahaz on the throne. A corrupt, idolatrous monarch. Dies, 725 b. o. He is not allowed a place In the sepulchre of the kings. CHAPTER XXI. Israel, from b. o. 895 to b. c. 719. Jehu comes to the throne, b. o. 895. The coun try east of the , Jordan seized by Hazael, king of Syria. Death of Jehu. Death of Elisha. Jonah's mission. Conquest of Samaria and the whole country by Shalma- neser, king of Assyria. The principal in habitants carried away captive. Judah, from b. c. 725 to b. o. 586. Hezekiah, a pious prince. Description of tho sepulchre of the kings. Hezekiah restores the true worship. The passover revived. Hezekiah subject, for a time, to Sennache rib, the Assyrian king. Destruction of the Assyrian host bya "blast" from the Lord. Sickness of Hezekiah. His life prolonged in answer to prayer. His death. Manas seh succeeds, at twelve years of a<;e. lie becomes corrupt Defeated by Esarhad- don, taken captive, and sent to Babylon. He repents and is released. Josiah, a good king. He overturns idolatry. Killed in battle against Necho, king of Egypt. Jo- hoiakim. Warning by Jeremiah. IDs Imprisonment by Jehoiakim. Jehoiakim SLUlued by Nebuchadnezzar. Forty thou sand of the people sent into captivity. Zedekiah made king. He revolts. Nebu chadnezzar burns the temple and city, de molishes the walls, carries off all tho sacred vessels and treasure. Zedekiah is taken, and carried in fetters to Babylon. The country depopulated. 875 CHAPTER XXII. The seventy years' captivity. Discussion of the causes of the downfall of the Hebrew nation. The divine Intention in its estab lishment not frustrated. Media the scene of the captivity. Tho captivity a coloniza tion rather than a slavery. Tobit Daniel and his three friends. Their Chaldean names. Nebuchadnezzar's dream of the image. Daniel's interpretation. Nebuch adnezzar acknowledges God. Daniel and his friends promoted. They refuse to wor ship the image. The fiery furnace. Other dreams. Their interpretation and accom plishment Nebuchadnezzar again honors . Jehovah. Ho dies, 561 b. o. Succeeded , by Evil Merodach, who Is slain in battle with Cyrus. Belshazzar comes to the throne. He profanes the sacred vessels. The handwriting upon the wall. Daniel's interpretation. Belbhazzar's death, 553 b. o. Darius tikes the kingdom. Daniel exalted. Jealousy. He is thrown to lions for pray ing to the Almighty. His deliverance. Jehovah honored. Death of Darius, 551 b. o. Cyrus succeeds. Defection of Na- bonadius. Babylon taken by Cyrus. Pro phecy of Isaiah. Cyrus acknowledges the supremacy of Jehovah. He allows the captives to return to the Holy Land. 892 CHAPTER XXIII. The Restoration. The honor of Jehovah main- ¦ tained and extended by the Captivity. Why was Judah allowed to return, and not Israel? Remarks of Professor Jahn. What became of the Ten TribeB? Remarks of Eabbi Benjamin — of Major Eawlinson. Ze- rubbabel and Joshua, with Ifty thousand of the people, return to Palestine. Daniel remains at the Court of Cyrus. Zerubba- bol is appointed Governor of Judea. He receives from Cyrus the sacred vessels of the Temple. 3? east of Tabernacles cele brated at Jerusalem. An altar is built on the ruins of the Temple. The people as semble to rebuild the Temple. Death of Cyrus. Darius Hystaspes elected King. The Temple completed, 516 b. o. The dedi cation. The temple service re-established. Battle of Marathon, b. c. 490. Darius dies, 485 b. o. Succeeded by Xerxes, the Ahasu- erus of Ezra. Artaxerxes. The rebuilding of Jerusalem stopped. Queen Vashti de posed. EBther promoted. Ezra commis sioned to go to Jerusalem and beautify the Tflmple. The plot of Haman. The Jews saved by Esther'. Nehemiah gains permis sion to rebuild the walls. Jeremiah ap pointed Governor of Judea. Collection and revisal of the sacred books of the Old Testament The Chaldee dialect displaces TABLE OF CONTENTS. the old Hebrew. A temple built on Mount Gerizim. End of the Old Testament Can on. CHAPTEE XXIV. (From b. 0. 420 to b. o. 163.) Inspired History is discontinued from 420 b. o. to His birth. Hebrew history derived from Josephus and others. Artaxerxes succeed ed by Xerxes on the Persian throne. Wars of the Persians with the Egyptians. The Jews faithful to the Persians. Destruction of Sidon. Overthrow of E^rypt by the Per sian King, 850 b. o. Invasion of Persia by Alexander, 334 b. c. Fulfilment of the prophecy of Zechariah. Alexander invades Syria. He is met in his march against Jerusalem by a procession of priests. He is shown the prophecy of Daniel. Offers sacrifices. Grants the Jews free enjoy ment of their national laws. Exemption from tribute every seventh year. Alexan der dies at Babylon. Ptolemy. He favors the Jews. Depopulation of Babylon. The High Priest, Simon, repairs the temple and city of Jerusalem. He completes the Canon of the Old Testament. Simon dies, 291 b. o. Ptolemy Philadelphus executes the transla tion of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek, called the Septuagint, b. o. 278. Influence of the Greeks. Origin of the Sadducees. Persecution of the Jews by Ptolemy Philo- { later. Destruction of the temple by Appo- onius, 167 b. c. Idolatry established. Judas Maccabeus desires to maintain the true worship. He gains the mastery of Judea. Attempts to rebuild the temple. Wars of the Maccabees. 422 CHAPTER XXV. Death of Judas Maccabeus. Jonathan suc ceeds him. His treaty with the Syrian king. Siege of the citadel of Jerusalem. Jonathan taken and murdered. Simon, his brother, succeeds him as leader of the Maccabees. Simon gains possession ofthe country. Alliance with the Romans. Cleo patra becomes'mistress of Syria. Pompey en.ters Syria, 65 n. o. The country becomes a Eoman province. The temple taken and complete establishment of the Roman pow er, b. o. 63. Cicero and Antonius, Eoman Consuls. The Jews obliged to pay large trib ute. Hyrcanus appointed High Priest CHAPTEE XXVI. Antipater, governor of Judea. The Sanhedrim suppressed. The government changed to an aristocracy. Hyrcanus and the Jewish government restored, b. o. 44,.. by Julius Caesar. The temple plundered by Crassus. Liberty given to rebuild the walls of Jeru salem. Herod made king, 40 b. c. His cruelty. He builds cities and splendid palaces. He builds heathen temples. He also rebuilds the temple of Jehovah at Jerusa lem, b. o. 17. Birth of John the Baptist, b. o. 5. Birth of Jesus Christ Slaughter of the infants of Bethlehem. Account of Herod's ten wives. His death. Archelaus, his son, succeeds him. Account of the Herods. 1 CHAPTEE XXVII. Prophecies concerning Christ, and the Chris tian religion. The time of His appearance. The place of His birth. The family from which He was to come. His life and char acter. His sufferings and death. The nature of His doctrine. The extent of His Kingdom. The value of the Bible. 15ft 474 NEW TESTAMENT. CHAPTEE L The New Testament the best commentary on the Old. The promise of the Angel Ga briel to Zacharias an Elizabeth. The an nouncement by Gabriel to the Virgin Mary. Birth of John. Bethlehem. Birth of Christ The joy of the aged Simeon and Anui. The wise men. The Star. Herod's bloody purpose. Flight of Joseph to Egypt. Death of Herod. Eeturn of Joseph and Mary. Nazareth. John the Baptist. Baptism of Christ. His fast of forty days. His temptation. Testimony of John. Christ's miracle at Cana. De scription of Cana. Cleansing the Temple. Nicodemus. Death of John. Christ in Galilee. Attempt of the people to kill him. Call of Simon and Andrew, James and John. The great draught of fishes. Healing of the demoniac, and of Peter's wife's mother. Sermon on the Mount Mimcies. Pool of Bethesda. The man with the withered hand. The twelve Apostles. Their commission. CHAPTEE II. Raising the widow's son at Nain. Christ is anointed from the alsbaster box of precious ointment. Description of Tiberias. The stilling of the tempest. Casting out of devils. Eaising ofthe daughter of Jairus. Feeding of the multitude. The storm upon the lake. Peter's attempt to walk upon the 499 water. Second miraculous supply of food to the multitude. Christ's transfiguration. Healing of the lunatic. - Paying * tribute. Teaching in the Temple. Discussions with < the Scribes. Jericho. The Holy Land in the time of Christ, with map. Parable of the Prodigal. The rich man and Lazarus. Restoring sight to the blind. Christ blesses little children. Mary and Martha. Raising of Lazarus. CHAPTEE III. 510 The Passover at Jerusalem. Description of Jerusalem, with a plan. Plan of the Temple. Blind Bartimeus. -Bethany. The anointing by Mary. Triumphal entry into Jerusalem. .Expulsion of the money changers from the Temple. Treachery of Judas. The Last Supper. Gethsemane. The olive-trees. Peter's zeal. The agony. - Peter's fall. His repentance. ' Remorse of Judas. His suicide. 520 CHAPTER IV Jesus at the bar of Pilate. His condemnation. Mocking. Scourging. Crowning with thorns. Crucifixion. The two thieves. Description of the cross, and the mode of execution. Christ's filial affection. The darkness. Rending of the veil of the Temple. Rending of the rocks. Opening &Jf? g/a^e8. Piercing of the body. Christ's bunal by Joseph. Closing the TABLE OF CONTENTS. XI tomb. The guard. The constancy of the women. The Eesurrection. Absurd false hood of the chief priests. ChriBt's appear ance to Mary — to Thomas— to the two dis ciples on the way to Emmaus— to the dis ciples at tho Sea of Tiberias. His final instructions to the Apostles. His ascen sion from the Mount of Olives. The char acter of Christ. The Christian religion. Contrast with heathenism. List of Christ's Miracles, Parables, and Discourses. 524 CHAPTER V. From the Ascension to the full establishment of Christianity. Choice of Matthias as successor to Judas. Pentecost. The gift of tongues. Preaching of Peter. Conver sion of three thousand people. Healing of the cripple at the beautiful gate. Peter and John thrown into prison. Peter's ad dress to the Council. They are released. The gift of the Holy Ghost Charity of the believers. Ananias and Sapphira. Cures wrought by the Apostles. They are again cast into prison. Miraculous deliverance. They are scourged. Choice of seven dea cons to care for the poor. Stephen. His arrest. His address to the Council. HIb martyrdom. Dispersion of the Christians from Jerusalem. 540 CHAPTEE VI. Philip flees from Jerusalem. His successful preaching in Samaria. Philip and the Eunuch. Saul's persecution of Christians. His miraculous conversion. Cesarea. Damascus. His powerful preaching. De scription of Joppa. Peter raises Tabitha, His vision and commission to the Gentiles. Cornelius. Peter's discourse. Descent of the Holy Ghost Conversion and baptism of many. CHAPTEE VIL Persecutions under Herod Agrippa. He kills James. Peter imprisoned. He is deliver ed by an'angel in answer to prayer. Death of Herod. Barnabas and Saul journey to Cyprus, Paphos, Perga, and Antioch, preaching. Paul's discourse in the syna gogue in Pisidia. He is invited to preach again. He proclaims the doctrine that salvation is for the Gentiles as well as the Jews. He is driven out of the city. He heals the cripple at Lystra. The people wish to offer sacrifice to him and Barna bas. They forbid it. Paul stoned. 557 CHAPTEE VIII. Paul and Silas make an extensive tour to preach. The cure of the demoniac. Paul and Silas are taken before the magistrates. Imprisoned, with their feet in the stocks. They pray and sing. The prison doors opened by an earthquake. Conversion and baptism of the jailer and his family. Paul at Athens. Idolatry of the city. Paul brought before the Areopagus. His discourse to the judges. Conversion of some persons of rank. Paul at Corinth. Description of the city. Paul writes his second letter to the Thessalonians. Paul's success at Ephesus. Geographical no tices. 564 CHAPTER IX description of Ephesus. Disorderly conduct of some Christians at Corinth. Paul writes them a letter. He also writes to the Gala tians. Jealousy of Demetrius, the silver smith. Paul's deliverance from the fury of the people. He leaves Timothy in care of the Church at Ephesus. He travels through Macedonia and Achaia. He preaches at Troas. The death of Eu- tychus. Paul restores him to life. Geo graphical notices. Paul's farewell dis course to the Ephesian Christians. He visits Tyre. Hero he is advised not to go to Jerusalem. Paul at Jerusalem. He is falsely accused and dragged from the Tem ple: He is allowed by tho Roman com mandor to speak. He gives a detailed ac count Of his conversion. They dare not scourge him, because he is a Roman citi zen. The plot to kill him. It is frus trated. He is Bent under guard to Cesarea to Felix, the Eoman governor. 576 CHAPTEE X. Paul brought before Felix. Tertullus speaks against Mm. Paul's defence. Paul speaks again before Felix and his wife, Drusilla, upon the doctrines of Christianity. Paul Is kept in prison two years. He is brought before the new governor, Festus. Paul's defence and appeal to Csesar. His speech before Agrippa. He is Bent to Rome. The shipwreck. Paul's vision. He foretells the safety of all. They land on the island of Malta. Account of Malta. Paul heals the governor's father. Per forms many other cures. They remain three months on the island. Arrival at Rome. Paul assembles the rulers and ex plains the doctrines of the Gospel. He preaches two years at Rome. Description of the city. Colossal Paul writes his let ter to Philemon — also an epistle to the Ephesians— also to the Colossians. James writes his epistle. Martyrdom of James. His character. 535 CHAPTEE XL After two vears Paul is set at liberty. He writes nis epistle to the Hebrews. He, with Timothy, travels into Spain. Visits Sicily and Greece. Peter also set at lib erty. He visits Africa, Sicily, Italy, and Britain, preaching the Christian faith. Ho returns to Eome. Nero orders the perse cution of the Jews. Burning of Rome by Nero. Paul returns to Rome. Paul and Peter instruct the Jews in the synagogues. They are thrown into prison. Here Peter writes his second epistle, and Paul his sec ond letter to Timothy. They are con demned to death, Peter is crucified. Paul beheaded. Sketch of their charac ters. 596 CHAPTER XII. St. Andrew. He was crucified. He taught the people while hanging upon the cross. St. James the Great Beheaded. St John the Evangelist. Thrown into a caldron of boil ing oil, Miraculously saved. Banished to Patmos, where he wrote the Revelation. Account of Patmos. St John, the only Apostle who escaped a violent death. St. Philip, crucified. St Bartholomew, beaten and crucified. St Matthew. Thought to have been slain with a halberd. St. Thomas. Pierced with a lance. St Simon the Zealot. Crucified. St Jude. Cruelly Sut to death. St. Matthias. Stoned. St. lark. Bound and dragged through rough places till he died. St. Luke. Hung on an olive-tree. St. Barnabas. Stoned. Timo thy. Beaten to death. Titus— died a natural death. John Mark— died at Ephe sus. Clement— death unknown. 604 TABLE OF CONTENTS. CHAPTEE XIII. The seven churches of Asia. Ephesus. Smyrna, Pergamos. Thyatira. Sardis. Philadel phia. Laodicea. CHAPTER XIV. Account of the final destruction of Jerusalem by the Eomans, a. d. 70, as foretold by our Saviour. Josephus an eye-witness. Pro phecies in regard to it. Their agreement with fac& Prodigies that preceded the destruction of the city. Eevolt under Eleazer. Massacre of Jews at Cesarea. Siege of Jerusalem by CeBtius. His re pulse. Vespasian assumes command o. the Roman army. Great slaughter of the Jews. Siege of Jotapata. Its reduction. Capture of Joseph, the Jewish general. He foretells the elevation of VeBpasian to the Empire. Death of Nero. Civil war at Rome. Vespasian proclaimed Emperor by the army. He sets Joseph at liberty. He commits the war against the Jews to his son Titus. Titus lays siege to Jerusa lem. Joseph in vain entreats the Jews to surrendor. Famine in the city. Plunder and burning of the temple. Conquest of the city, and its complete destruction. 681 AN ILLUSTEATED HISTORY OF THE HOLY BIBLE. HISTORIC AND LITERARY INTRODUCTION. The Bible of the Christians is, without exception, the most remarkable work now in existence. In the libraries of the learned, there are frequently seen books of an extraoidmary antiquity, and curious and interesting from the nature of their contents ; but none approach the Bible, taken in its complete sense, in point of age, while cer tainly no production whatever has any pretension to rival it in the dignity of compo sition, or the important nature of the subjects treated of in its pages. The word Bible is of Greek origin, and, in signifying simply The Book, is expressive of its su periority over all other literary productions. The origin and nature of this every way singular work, how it was preserved during the most remote ages, and how it became known to the modern world in its present shape, form a highly interesting chapter of literary history. The Bible comprehends the entire foundation of the religious belief of the .Tews and Christians, and is divided into two distinct portions, entitled the Old and New Testaments, the former being that which is esteemed by the Jewish nation, but both neing essential in forming the faith of the Christian. The Old Testament is the largest department of the work, and appears a collection of detached histories, moral essays, and pious poetical effusions, all placed together in the order of time, or, as they may serve, for the purpose of mutual illustration. On taking a glance at the contents, the principal subject of narration seems the history of the Jews, com mencing with an account of the creation of the world, and tracing their history gen ealogically, through a series of striking vicissitudes and changes of situation. But when we examine the narrative minutely, it is found that there is another meaning than that of mere historical elucidation. It is perceived that the whole train of events recorded, the whole of those lofty, impassioned strains of poetry which dis tinguish the volume, are precursory and prophetic of a great change, which, at a fu ture period, was to be wrought on the moral properties and fate of mankind, by the- coming to the earth of a Messiah. The authorship of the Old Testament has been universally ascribed, by both Jews- and Christians, to God himself, though not by direct composition, but by spiritually influencing the minds of certain sages to accomplish the work, or, in ordinary phrase ology, by inspiring or endowing them with a perfect knowledge of the transactions- to be recorded and predicted, in a way suitable to the great end in view. The Bible is hence usually termed the Sacred Scriptures. The periods when the act of writing all or most part of the Scriptures took place, as well as most of the names of those- who were instrumental in forming the work, have been ascertained with surprising. accuracy, both from written evidence in the narratives themselves, and from the well- preserved traditions of the Jews. At whatever time the different books were writ ten, they were not collected and put into a connected form till long after their im mediate authors were deceased ; and their present arrangement, as we shall after ward fully explain, is of comparatively modern date. According to the order in which the books of the Old Testament now stand, those- of an historical nature are appropriately placed at the beginning. The first five books,. paving a chain of connexion throughout, are Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers,, md Deuteronomy. These are styled the Pentateuch, such being the Greek com- 6 INTRODUCTION TO THE pound for five books. They are likewise entitled the Books of Moses, from the belief that that enlightened Jewish leader composed them. The Jews, or Hebrews, take the name of the sacred books from the first word with which each begins ; but the Greeks, whom our translators generally foll°w' take the names from the subject-matter of them. Thus, the first book is called by the Hebrews, Bereshith, which signifies " In the beginning," these being the first words : but the Greeks call it Genesis* which signifies " production," because the cre ation of the world is the first thing of which it gives an account. It likewise con tains an account of the increase of mankind ; of their corruption of manners, and its cause; of their punishment by the deluge (an event which, by scientific investigation and historical research, is placed beyond a doubt) ; of the origin of the Jewish peo ple from Abraham ; of the manner in which God was pleased to have them gov erned ; and, particularly, of the nature of the special superintendence vouchsafed to the Jewish nation by the Creator. This comprehensive narrative reaches from the creation of the world till the death of Joseph, or a period of 2,369 years. In another part of the Scriptures, reference is made to the Book . of Jasher, and it is believed that Genesis is there meant ; for Jasher signifies " the Just," and, according to St. Je rome, a learned Christian writer, the name of the Book of the Just, or the Authen tic Book, was applied to it from its containing the history of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Exodus, the title of the second book of Moses, signifies in the Greek," The going out," and was applied from the account which it gives of the Israelites going out of Egypt. In it are related the cruel Egyptian slavery under which .the Jews groaned ; their delivery by flight and passage through the Red sea;. the history of the estab lishment of their very peculiar law, and many, remarkable transactions ; concluding with the building of the tabernacle, or place appropriated to the service of the Di vinity. This book comprises the history of 145 years, from the .death of Joseph till the building of the tabernacle. The Hebrews call it VelleShemoth, that is, in En glish, " These are the names," which are the words with which it begins. The third book of Moses is called Leviticus, because it contains the laws which God commanded should be observed by those of the' tribe of Levi who ministered at the al tar. It treats at large of all the functions of the Levites ; of the ceremonial of religion ; of the different sorts of sacrifices ; of the distinction of clean and unclean beasts ; of the different festivals ; and of the year of jubilee, or continued holyday. It like wise presents us with an account of what happened to the Jews during the space of one month and a half; that is, from the time the tabernacle was erected, which was the first day of. the first month of the second year after the Israelites came out of Egypt, till the second month of the same year, when God commanded the people to be numbered. The Hebrews called this book Vayicre, that is, " And he called," these being the first, words ; they call it also The Law of the Priests. In the fourth book, which we. call Numbers, Moses numbers the Israelites, and that, too, in the beginning of the booK, which shows whence it had its name. The Hebrews call it Vayedavber, that is, " And he spake." This book contains the history of all that passed from the second month of the second year after the Israelites came out of Egypt, till the beginning of the eleventh month of the fortieth year ; that is, it contains the history of thirty-nine years, or thereabouts. In it we have also the history of the prophet Balaam, whom the king of the Midianites brought to curse the people of God, and who, on the contrary, heaped blessings upon the Israel ites, and foretold the coming of the Messiah. It particularly mentions, also, the two-and-forty encampments of the Israelites in the wilderness. The fifth book is called Deuteronomy, a Greek term which signifies, " The second law," or, rather, " The repetition of the law," because it does not contain a law dif ferent from that which was given on Mount Sinai ; but it repeats the same law, for the sake of the children of those who had received it there, and were since dead it. the wilderness. The Hebrews call it Elle-haddebarim, that is, "These are the words." Deuteronomy begins with a short account of what had passed in the wil derness, and then Moses repeats what he had before commanded in Exodus, Leviti cus, and Numbers, and admonishes the people to be faithful in. keeping the com mandments of God. After this, he relates what, had happened from. the, beginning of the eleventh month, to the seventh day of the twelfth month of the same year, which was the fortieth after their leaving Egypt. The discourse which is at the begin- HISTORY OP THE BIBLE. 7 ning of this book was made to the people by Moses, on the first day of the eleventh month. According to Josephus, he died on the first day of the twelfth ; and the Israelites, as the Scriptures say, mourned for him in the plains of Moab thirty days, and, consequently, during the whole of the twelfth month. The Jews called the Pentateuch " The Law," without doubt because the law of God which Moses received on Mount Sinai is the principal part of it ; and it is as little to' be doubted whether that great man was the writer of the Pentateuch. This is expressly declared both in Exodus and Deuteronomy. But as an account of the death of Moses is given in the last eight verses of this book, it is therefore thought that these verses were added either by Joshua or Ezra. The opinion of Josephus concerning them is very singular ; he pretends that Moses, finding his death approach ing, and being willing to prevent an error into which the veneration the people had for him might cause the Jews to fall, wrote this account himself, without which the Jews would probably have supposed that God had taken him away, like Enoch. After the death of Moses, Joshua, by the order of the Divine Being, took upon himself the conducting of the Hebrew people, and succeeded Moses, to whom he had been a faithful servant, and by whom he had been instructed in what he ought to do. It is uncertain whether the book which contains the history of this successor of Moses be called Joshua, from the subject of it, or from his having been the wri ter of it. But it is certain that it contains an account of what passed from the death of Moses to that of Joshua. Nevertheless, there are several things in it which did not come to pass till after the death of this great man, and which, consequently, could not have been written by him. The common opinion as to the length of time it contains is, that Joshua discharged his office only for seventeen years, and that, therefore, this book contains no more than the history of that number of years. After the death of Joshua, the Israelites were governed by magistrates, who ruled under the general designation of Judges; and the book which contains the history of these rulers is called, The Book of Judges. This history begins with the .death of Joshua, and reaches to that of Samson. We here see the people of God often en slaved in punishment of their crimes, and often wonderfully delivered from slavery. Toward the end of it, we have some instances of this people's inclination to idolatry, and of the corruption of their manners, even before they had been brought into slavery. Such are the histories of Micah, and of the Benjamites who abused the Levite's wife. This book contains the history of three hundred and seventy years. During the time of the government of the Judges, there was a great famine m the land of Israel, which forced Elimelech, a native of Bethlehem, to retire into the land of Moab, with his wife Naomi, and two children. Elimelech died there, as also his two sons, who had married two Moabitish women, one of whom was named Ruth. Naomi, after the death of her husband and her children, returned to Bethle hem, accompanied by Ruth, her daughter-in-law, who was there married to Boaz, Elimelech's near relation, and the heir to his estate. The book which contains this history, is called, The Book of Ruth. The beginning of it shows that it happened in the time of the Judges, but under which of them is not certainly known; some place it in the time of Shamgar, or of Deborah. As to the writer of this book, some think that the books of Judges and Ruth were both written by Samuel; others at tribute them to Hezekiah, and others to Ezra. The Jews place the boob of Ruth among the five books which they usually read on all the festivals in the year. These five books are, the Song of Songs, Ruth, the Lamentations of Jeremiah, Ecclesiastes, and the book of Esther. In the Hebrew bibles they are printed or written apart by themselves, and are bound lip together. The four books following Ruth are called by the Greeks, and also in some Latin bibles, The History of the Reigns. Others call them all, The Books of Kings, because they give an account of the establishment of the monarchy, and of the suc cession of the kings, who reigned over the whole kingdom at first, and over the king doms of Judah and Israel after its division. At the beginning of these books is given the history of the prophet Samuel, which gives light to that of The Kings. The Jews call the first two of these books, The Books of Samuel : perhaps because they contain the history of the two kings, who were both anointed by Samuel ; and be cause what is said of Saul in the first, and of David in the second, proves the truth of Samuel's prophecies. They give the name of The Books of Kings only to the other 6 INTRODUCTION TO THE two, which, in the Latin and French bibles, are called the Third and Fourth Boobs of Kings. The First Book of Kings, or the First of Samuel, contains the history of the high- priest Eli, of Samuel, and of Saul. As the first year of Eli's high-priesthood falls on the year of the world 2848, and the death of Saul in 2949, the history of this book must comprehend the space of one hundred and one years. The Second contains the reign of David, which is the history of about forty years. It is commonly believed that Samuel, Nathan, and Gad, were the writers of these two books, and, indeed, they are called, in the end of the first book of Chronicles, David's historians. The Third, or, according to the Hebrews, the First Book of Kings, begins with a relation of the manner in which Solomon came to the throne, and contains the whole of his reign. After that, an account follows of the division of the kingdom, and the history of four kings of Judah and eight kings of Israel. All these reigns, including that of Solomon, which occupies the first forty years, comprise the space of one hun dred and twenty-six years. The Fourth of these books contains the history of sixteen kings of Judah, and twelve kings of Israel. It likewise gives an account of the prophets who lived dur ing this time. It is quite uncertain who were the writers of the last two mentioned books. They are by some attributed to Jeremiah or Ezra, but no very convincing proofs have been adduced in support of this opinion. It is evident, indeed, that these books form a varied collection of several particular histories. The name of Paralipomena, which in Greek signifies the " history of things omit ted," is given to the two books which follow those of The Kings. These form, in fact, a supplement, containing what had been omitted in the Pentateuch, and the books of Joshua, Judges, and Kings, or rather they contain a fuller description of some things which had been therein only briefly related. Some give them the name of Chronicles, because they are very exact in mentioning the time when every trans action happened. We divide them into two books, as do also the Jews, who call them Dibere Hayanim, that is, an " historical journal," the matters of which they treat having been taken from the journals of the kings. In the original language, however, the word days often signifies the year ;¦ and, in this sense, we may under stand the term to signify properly "annals." The generally-received opinion is, that Ezra was the writer of these. In the first book, he begins with a succinct historical abridgment, from the creation of Adam to the return of the Jews from their cap tivity ; and then he resumes the history of David, and carries it on to the consecra tion of Solomon, that is, down to the year before Christ 1015. The history contained in the second book reaches down to the year before Christ 536, when, upon the expi ration of the seventy years of captivity, Cyrus gave the Jews leave to return to then- own country. Ezra wrote the history of the return of the Jews from the captivity of Babylon into Judea. It is the history of about eighty-two years, from the year of the world 3468, when Cyrus became master of the eastern empire, by the death of his father, Cam- byses, in Persia, and his father-in:law, Cyaxares, in Media, to the year 3550, which was the twentieth year of the reign of Artaxerxes, suruamed Longimanus. This book bears the name of Ezra, who was the writer of it. The next book is a continuation of that of Ezra, and therefore it is by some called the Second Book of Ezra. It was Nehemiah, however, whose name it also bears. who wrote it, as is said, by the advice of Ezra. It contains the account of the re- establishment of Jerusalem, and the temple, and the worship of God. It is the his tory of about thirty-one years; that is to say, from the twentieth year of the reign of Artaxerxes Longimanus, to the reign of Darius Nothus, his son, which began, in the year of the world 3581. After this general history of the Jews, follow two histories of particular persons, viz., Esther and Job. The first contains the account of a miraculous deliverance of the Jews, which was accomplished by means of the heroine named Esther. The Scrip ture says it happened under the reign of Ahasuerus, king of Persia ; but as there have been several Persian kings of that name, it is not exactly known in which reio-n it is to be dated. Dr. Lightfoot thinks it was that Artaxerxes who hindered the build ing of the temple, and who, in the book of Ezra, is called also Ahasuerus, after his great grandfather *he king of the Medes. HISTORY OF THE BIBLE. 9 The history of Job, which is next in order, is not only a narration of his actions, but contains also the entire discourses which this pious man had with his wife and his friends, and is, indeed, one of the most eloquent books in the Holy Scriptures. It is generally conjectured that Moses was the writer or compiler of this book ; but this in very uncertain. Next lo the historical books of Scripture follow those of a moral nature. The first of these is the Book of Psalms, which is likewise in some measure historicai ; for they recite, the miracles which God had wrought, and contain, as it were, an abridg ment of all that had been done for the Israelites, and that had happened to them. The Hebrews call them " the Book of Praises," by which they mean, " of the Praises of God." The word psalm is Greek, and properly signifies the sound of a stringed instrument of music. The Hebrews sung the Psalms with different instruments. We make but one book of them all, but the Hebrews divide them into five parts, which all end with the words Amen, Amen. Though the Psalms bear the name of David, yet they were not all composed by him ; some of them are more ancient, and others are of a later date than his time; some of them being ascribed to Moses, Samuel, and Ezra. Speaking of the dedication of the second temple, Prideaux says, " In this dedication, the 146th, the 147th, and the 148th psalms seem to have been sung ; for in tlie Septuagint versions they are styled the Psalms of Haggai and Zechariah, as if they had been composed by them for this occasion ; and this, no doubt, was from some ancient tradition : but, in the original Hebrew, these Psalms have no such title prefixed to them, neither have they any other to contradict it." It i<5 not probable, however, that all those whose names they bear were the true authors of them ; it is more likely that these are only the names of those to whom they were first given to sing. After the Psalms are the Proverbs, which are a collection of moral sentences, of which Solomon was the writer. This name is given them by the Greeks, but the Hebrews call them Myste, that is, parables, or comparisons ; and the word may also signify sentences, or maxims. It is a collection of divine precepts, proper for every age, and every condition of life. The book which follows is also a moral one, and was likewise composed by Solo mon. The Greeks call it Ecclesiastes, which answers to the name of Koheleth, which it bears in the Hebrew. Both these words signify, in our language, a preacher, or one who speaks in an assembly. In this book is given an admirable picture of the vanity ofthe world. Among the moral books is also reckoned the Song of Songs ; that is to say, accord ing to the Hebrew manner of speaking, a most excellent song. This book has noth ing of morality in it, and therefore, it is thought the only reason of its being placed here is because it was a third work of Solomon ; for there is not one moral or religious maxim in it, and the name of God is not so much as mentioned in it, except once in the original Hebrew, where it is used adjectively. It is an Epithalamium, or nup tial song, wherein, by the expressions of love between a bridegroom and his bride, are set forth and illustrated the mutual affections that pass between Ged and a dis tinguished remnant of mankind. It is a sort of dramatic poem or pastoral : the bride and bridegroom, for the more lively representation of humility and innocence, are brought in as a shepb'.J and shepherdess. We learn from St. Jerome, that the Jews were not permitted to read this song, or the chapters at the beginning of the book of Genesis, till they were thirty years old. In regard to the prophets, it may be observed, that all the Old Testament is con sidered to be in substance one continued prophecy of the coming of Jesus Christ ; so that all the books of which it consists are understood to be in some sense prophetical. But this name is more especially given to those books which were written by persons who had a clearer knowledge of futurity, who forewarned both kings and people of what would happen to them, and who at the same time pointed out what the Mes siah was to do, whom they who are acknowledged to have been prophets had always in view : and this is what ought most especially to be taken notice of in their writings. The prophecies bear the name of those to whom they belong. Some learned men are of opinion that the prophets made abridgments of the discourses which they had written, and fixed them up at the gates ofthe temple, that all the people might read them ; and that after this ihe ministers of the temple might take them away, and place them among the archives, which is the reason why we have not the prophecies 10 INTRODUCTION TO THE in the order in which they were written. But the interpreters of Scripture have long since labored to restore that order, according to the course of their history. The works of the prophets are divided into two parts, the first of which contains the greater, and the second, the lesser prophets. This distinction, of course, does not apply at all to the persons of the prophets, but only to the bulk of their works. The greater prophets are Isaiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, and Jeremiah. The Lamentations of Jeremiah make a separate book by themselves, containing that prophet's descriptions, of the destruction of the city of Jerusalem, and of the captivity of the people. The lesser prophets are Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micai, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Ha'ggai, Zechariah, and Malachi. They were formerly contained in one single volume, which the Hebrews call Thereaser, which means twelve, or the book of the twelve. The dates of many of the prophecies are uncertain, but the earliest of them was in the days of Uzziah, king of Judah, and Jeroboam the Second, his contemporary, king of Israel, about 200 years before the captivity, and not long after Joash had slain Zechariah, the son of Jehoiada, in the court of the temple. Hosea was the first of the writing prophets, and Joel, Amos, and Obadiah, published their prophecies about the same time. Isaiah began his remarkable prophecies a short time afterward, but his book is placed first, because it is the largest of them all, and is more explicit relative to the advent of Christ than any of the others. The language of this eminent writer is ex ceedingly sublime and affecting ; so much so, that it has never been equalled by any profane poet either in ancient or modern .times. It is impossible to read some of the chapters without being struck by the force of the prophetic allusions to the character and sufferings of the Messiah ; and in consequence of these prevailing characteristics, the author is ordinarily styled the evangelical prophet, and by some of the ancients, a fifth evangelist. The Jews say that the spirit of prophecy continued forty years during the second temple ; and Malachi they call the seal of prophecy, because in him the succession or series of prophets broke off, and came to a period. The book of Malachi, therefore, appropriately closes the sacred record of the Old Testament. The second and lesser division of the Bible relates entirely to the Christian re ligion, or the fulfilment of that which was predicted in the preceding and more ancient department ofthe work. This division of the sacred Scriptures is generally styled the New Testament; and that portion of it which relates to the history of the life of Christ is called the Gospel, and by some the Evangel, both these words having the same meaning, and implying good news, or glad tidings, from the circumstance that the narratives contain an account of things which are to benefit mankind. The New Testament, like the Old, is a compilation of books written by different in spired individuals, and all put together in a manner so as to exhibit a regular account of the birth, actions, and death of Christ — the doctrines he promulgated — and the prophe cies regarding the future state of the church which he founded. The hisiorical books are the four gospels and the Acts of the Apostles, all these being of the character of narratives of events; the doctrinal are the Epistles of St. Paul, and some others; the prophetic book is the last, and this is called the Revelation or Apocalypse of St. John, having been written by that aposlle while he was in the island of Patmos. The writers of the books of the New Testament are gent. -illy well known, each having the name of the author affixed to it, with the exception of the Acts of the Apostles, which, it is presumed, was compiled by St. Luke. It was long disputed whether St. Paul was the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews ; Tertullian, an an cient Christian writer, and some others, attribute it to St. Barnabas ; others to St Luke ; and others to St. Clement ; while some think, with greater probability, that St. Paul dictated it, and St. Luke acted as the writer ; and that the reason why the name of the true author was not affixed to it, was because he was disliked by the Jews. The four evangelists, or writers of the leading narratives, are St. Matthew, St. Mark, St. Luke, and St. John ; these having been companions to Christ during his ministrations, and, therefore, personally acquainted with his life and character Each of the four books is principally a repetition of the history of Christ, yet they ali possess a difference of style,,and each mentions some circumstances omitted by the others, so that the whole is essential in making up a complete life of the Messiah. These distinctions in the tone of the narratives and other peculiarities, are always considered as strong circumstantial evidence in proof of their authenticity and ni HISTORY OF THE BIBLE. 11 ihwe having been no collusion on the part of the writers. But, indeed, the events they record are detailed in so exceedingly simple and unaffected a manner, that it is impossible to suppose that they were written with a view to impose on the credulity of mankind. The veracity and actual belief of the evangelists themselves are placed beyond a doubt. The first book is written by Matthew, who was by birth a Jew, and exercised the profession of a publican — that is, a collector of the public tax or assessment imposed upon the Jewish people by their conquerors, the Romans. Matthew, who was also called by the name of Levi, was one ofthe twelve apostles of Christ, and he is said to have written his narrative about eight years after the departure of his Master from the earth. Many of the ancients say "that he wrote it in the Hebrew or Syriac language; but Dr. Whitby is clearly of opinion that this tradition is entirely void of foundation, and that it was doubtless written in Greek, as the other parts of the New Testament were. Yet it is probable that there might be an edition of it in Hebrew, published by St. Matthew himself, at the same time that he wrote it in Greek ; the former for the Jews, the latter for the Gentiles, when he left Judea to preach among the heathen. In regard to Mark, the writer of the second Gospel, it may be observed, that although Mark, or Marcus, was a Roman name, and a very common one, yet we have no reason to think but that he was by birth a Jew ; but as Saul, when he went among the Gentiles, took the Roman name of Paul, so did this evangelist take that of Mark, his Jewish name, perhaps, being Mardacai, as Grotius observes. Jerome and Tertullian say that he was a disciple of the Apostle Peter, and his interpreter or amanuensis. We have every reason to believe that both he and Luke were of the number of the seventy disciples who companied all along with the apostles, and who had a commission like to theirs: so that it is no diminution at all to the validity or value of this Gospel that Mark was not one of the twelve, as Matthew and John were. Jerome says, that after the writing of this Gospel he went into Egypt, and was the first that preached the gospel at Alexandria, where he founded a church, to which he was a great example of holy living. The Gospel of St. Mark is much shorter than that of Matthew, not giving so full an account of Christ's sermons as that did, but insisting chiefly on his miracles ; and in regard to these, also, it is very much a repetition of what we have in Matthew, many remarkable circumstances being added to the stories there related, but not many new matters. There is a tradition that it was first written in Latin, because it was written at Rome ; but this is generally thought to be without foundation, and that it was written in Greek, as was St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans, the Greek being the more universal language. Luke, the name of the third evangelist, is considered by some to be a contraction of Lucilius, and it is said by St. Jerome to have been borne at Antioch. Some think that he was the only one of all the penmen of the Scriptures that was not of the Israelites ; that he was a Jewish proselyte, and was converted to Christianity by the ministry of St. Paul at Antioch, and after his coming into Macedonia he was his con stant companion. He had employed himself in the study and practice of physic, and hence Paul calls him "Luke, the beloved physician." It is more than probable, however, as is testified both by Origen and Epiphanius, that he was one of the seventy disciples, and a follower of Christ when he was upon earth ; and if so, he was most likely to be a native Israelite. Luke most probably wrote his Gospel at Rome, a little before he wrote his history of the " Acts of the Apostles," which is a continuation, of the former, when he was there with Paul, while he was a prisoner, and " preaching in his own hired house," with which the history of the Acts con cludes. In this case, it must have been written about twenty-seven years after Christ's departure, and about the fourth year ofthe reign of Nero. Jerome says thai St. Luke died when he was eighty-four years of age, and that he was never married. Dr. Cave observes that " his way and manner of writing are accurate and exact, his style polite and elegant, sublime and lofty, yet perspicuous; and that he expresses himself in a vein of purer Greek than is to be found in the other writers of this holy history." Thus he relates several things more copiously than the other evangelist*. and thus he especially treats of those things which relate to the priestly office of Christ. The fourth evangelist, John, was one of the sons of Zebedee, a fisherman of Gali- .2 INTRODUCTION TO THE tee, the brother of James, one of the twelve apostles, and distinguished by tne honorable appellation, " that disciple whom Jesus loved." The ancients tell us thai John lived the longest of all the apostles, and was the only one of them that died a natural death, all the rest suffering martyrdom ; and some of them say that he wrote this Gospel " Ephesus, at the request of the ministers of the several churches of Asia, in order to combat certain heresies. It seems most probable that he composed it before his banishment into the isle of Patmos, for there he wrote his Revelation, the close of which seems designed for the closing up of the canon of scripture; in which case this Gospel could not have been written after. It is clear that ne wrote the last of the four Evangelists, and, comparing his Gospel with theirs, we may observe that he relates what they had omitted, and thus gleans up what they had passed by. These four Gospels were early and constantly received by the primitive church, and read in Christian assemblies, as appears by the writings of Justin Martyr and Irenxus, who lived little more than one hundred years after the origin of Christianity.; they declared that neither more nor fewer than four were received by the church. A Harmony of these four Evangelists was compiled by Tatian about that time, which he called " The Gospel out of the four." In the third and fourth centuries there were gospels forged by divers sects, and published, one under the name of St. Peter, another of St. Thomas, another of St. Philip, &c. But they were never owned by the church, nor was any credit given to them, as the learned Dr. Whitby shows. And he gives this good reason why we should adhere to these written records : " be cause," says he, " whatever the pretences of tradition may be, it is not sufficient to preserve things with any certainty, as appears by experience. For whereas Christ said and did many memorable things which were not written, tradition has not pre served any one of them to us, but all is lost except what was written ; and that, there fore, is what we must abide by." After the Gospel, or history of Jesus Christ, follows the history of what passed after his ascension, and was transacted by the apostles. The book, therefore, which contains this history is called " The Acts of the Apostles." It is a history of the rising church for about the space of thirty years. It was written, as has been already observed, by St. Luke the Evangelist, when he was with St. Paul at Rome, during his imprisonment there. In the end of the book he mentions particularly his being with Paul in his dangerous voyage to Rome, when he was carried thither a prisoner; and it is'evident that he was with him when, from his prison there, Paul wrote his epistles to the Colossians and Philemon ; for in bolh of these he is named by him. Next to this come the Epistles of St. Paul, which are fourteen in number : one to the Romans, two to the Corinthians, one to the Galatians, one to the Ephesians, one to the Philippians, one to the Colossians, two to the Thessalonians, two to Timothy, one to Titus, one to Philemon, and one to the Hebrews. They contain that part of ecclesiastical history which immediately follows after what is. related in the Acts. The principal matter contained in them is the establishment or confirmation of the doctrine which Jesus Christ taught his disciples. According as the difficulties which raised disputes among the Christians, or the heresies which sprung up in the church from the first age of it, required, St. Paul in these epistles clears up and proves all matters of faith, and gives excellent rules for morality. His epistles may be con sidered as a commentary on, or an interpretation of, the four books of the Gospel.* The chronological succession ofthe Epistles, according to Prof. Lange, is as follows: 1. To the Thessalonians. 2. To the Galatians. 3. To the Corinthians. 4. To the * In respect to the leading design of the apostolical epistles, Dr. Bloomfield remarks : " That though the essential doctrines and precepts of Christianity are to be found in the ( lospels, yet a fuller and clearer statement of them was necessary, considering the altered state of things to that which existed during our ¦ Saviour's life-time ; and especially afner the uprise of serious corruptions and dangerouB errors, originating partly in misconception, but which required to be checked by a more explicit, aud yet equally authoritative revelation. Now this was done by St. Paul and the other writers of the Epistles. Consequently, though thi'y were written for the immediate purpose of refuting heresies, arising from a mixture of Christianity witli Judaism or Gentilism, of repressing corruptions, reforming abuses, and composing schisms and differ ences, yet, in point of fact, they became, and were avowedly, commentaries on the doctrines of Christ as delivered in the Gospels ; and though originally intended for particular Christian societies, yet are adapted to the instruction of Christians in all ages." Principles are involved, which are our surest guides on all points relating to church liberty, especially as to abstaining from things innocent in themselves if likely tc give offence to scrupulous brethren. — Ed. HISTORY OF THE BIBLE. J3 Romans. 5. The epistle of James. 6. To the Ephesians. 7. To the Philippians. 8. To the Hebrews. 9. The first epistle of Peter. 10. The first to Timothy. 11. To Titus. 12. The second to Timothy. 13. The second of Peter, 14. The epistle of Jude. 15. The three epistles of John. . As it respects the date of these apostolic epistles, it is very generally agreed that they were written between the years A. D. 54 and 68, excepting those of John, written probably between the years 96 and 100.* It has sometimes occurred to the minds of many well-disposed persons, that it would have been better for Christianity had there never been any other record of its origin and doctrines than the writings of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. But, however plain and satisfactory the histories of these evangelists may be, and how- evei little they admit of controversy, it has to be remembered that it required the strong arguments and illustrations brought forward in the epistles, by Paul and others, to combat the sophistry of the Greeks, and the self-sufficient philosophies of other races of man. Paul, the chief of the epistle writers, who became a Christian by conversion after Christ had departed from the earth, is the great champion of the faith, and exposes, in strong and dauntless language, the hidden depravities of the human heart ; so that where the affecting discourses and sufferings of the Messiah fail to convert and convince, the reasoning of this great writer is calculated to silence and subdue those who stubbornly resist the benignant influence of the Christian faith. The first division of the Scriptures, as already mentioned, is into the Old and New Testaments. The New belongs to the Christians, but the Old was received from the Tews ; and it is from them, therefore, that we must learn what the number of the books of it originally was, and everything else relating to this most ancient and in teresting production. The celebrated Jewish writers, Josephus and Philo, reckon two and twenty canoni cal books in the Old Testament, which is the number of the letters in the Hebrew alphabet: and to make out this, they join the book of Ruth to that of Judges, and the Lamentations of Jeremiah to the book of his Prophecies. But other Jewish doc tors divide the book of Ruth from that of Judges, and, making likewise a separate Book of the Lamentations of Jeremiah, they reckon four and twenty books in all. In order to accommodate this number to that of the letters of the alphabet, they repeat the letter yod three times, as they say, in honor to the great name of God Jehovah, of which yod is the first letter; and in Chaldee, three yods together were used to express this adorable name : but as the modern Jews thought this savored too much of what Christians call the Trinity, they use only two yods for this purpose. St. Jerome is of opinion that St. John had this division of the Hebrew scriptures in view, when in his Revelation he speaks of the four and twenty elders who paid adoration to the Lamb of God. The Jews divide the whole of these books into three classes, namely, the Law, the Prophets, and the Hagiographa or Holy Writings, which last division includes more particularly the poetical parts; and some are of opinion that Jesus Christ alludes to this division of the Scriptures, when he says that " all things must be fulfilled that were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning" him. For the book of Psalms, they understand all the books of the third class. The Law comprehends the Pentateuch; that is, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. The Prophetical books are eight, viz: (1) Joshua, (2) Judges, with Ruth, (3) Samuel, (4) Kings, (5) Isaiah, (6) Jeremiah, (7) Ezekiel, and (8) the twelve Lesser Prophets. The first four books of this division are called the For mer Prophets, and the last four the Latter Prophets. The Hagiographa, or Holy Writings, are nine, viz: (1) Job, (2) the Psalms, (3) Proverbs, (4) Ecelesiastes, (5) The Song of Songs, (6) Daniel, (7) Chronicles, (8) Ezra, with Nehemiah, and (9) Esther. The Jews do not put Daniel in the rank of a prophet, although they ac knowledge him to have been a man inspired by God, and whose writings are full of the clearest prophecies concerning the time of the Messiah's coming, and what should * The apostolic epistles are didactic or catholic. The didactic epistles are those addressed to particular churches ; the catholic or general are addressed to the whole church, or to a larger section of it. The writings of Paul, for the most part, belong to the former class. They are analyzed or classified by Lange, as MIOwb: 1. Eschatological epistles, which treat of the last things. 2. Ecclesiastic epistles, which treat of -the discipline of the church. 3. Soteriological epistles, which treat of redemption and righteousneRs by faith. 4. Christological epistles, which treat of the person of Christ. 5. Pastoral epistles. The Epistle to the Hebrews, that of James, and the three of John, and those of Peter and Jude, arc classed as catholu epistles.— Ed. 14 INTRODUCTION TO THK happen lo their nation. Jesus Christ, therefore, gives him the name of a Prophet, and the Jewish doctors are much puzzled to find out a proper reason for their no< doing the same. " It is," says Maimonides, " because everything that Daniel wrote was not revealed to him when he was awake and had the use of his reason, but in the night, and in obscure dreams." But this is a very unsatisfactory account of the matter; and others are of opinion that the name of a Prophet was commonly given to those only who were of a certain college, and whose business it was to write the annals ; and that, therefore, their works were ranked among the prophetical books, though they did not contain a single prediction of anything to come, as the books of Joshua and Judges ; while, on the contrary, the works of those who were not of these colleges of the prophets were not ranked, among the prophetical books, although they contained true prophecies. The Latins agree with the Jews as to the number of the Psalms, which is a hun dred and fifty ; but both they and the Greeks divide them differently from the He brews. In the Greek Bible and the Vulgate, or common Latin version, the. ninth and tenth, according to the Hebrew, make but one psalm ; and therefore, in order to make up the number of a hundred and fifty, they divide the hundred and forty-sev enth into two. This is the general division of the sacred books among the Jews. But they divide the Pentateuch, in particular, into certain paragraphs or sections, which they call Parashiuih, and which they subdivide into the Great and Little. A Great section contains as much as is to be read in the synagogue in a week. There are in all fifty- four of these, inasmuch as there may be so many weeks in a year ; for the Jews are obliged to read- all the Pentateuch over once every year, finishing it on the feast of tabernacles, and beginning, it again on the next sabbath day. In the time of the persecution by Antiochus Epiphanes, they also selected fifty-four sections to be read out of the Prophets, which have ever since constituted the second lessons in the Jewish synagogue-service. The Little sections, which are subdivisions of the Greater, are made according to the subjects they treat of; and these Great and Little sections are again of two sorts, one of which is called Petuchoth, that is, open sec tions ; and the other Sethumoth, that is, close sections. The former commences in the Hebrew Bibles always at the beginning of lines, and are marked with three P's if it be a great section, and with only one if it be a little section ; because P is the first letter of the word Petuchoth. Every open section takes its name from its first word ; and thus the first section in the whole Bible is called Bereshith, which is the first word of the Book of Genesis in Hebrew. The close sections begin the middle of a line, and are marked with the letter Samech, which is the first letter of the word Sethumoth ; if it be a great section it has three Samechs ; if a little section, only one. Every great section is also divided again into seven parts, which are read in the synagogue by so many different persons. If any priest be present, he begins, and a Levite reads after him ; and in the choice of the rest, regard is had to their dignity and condition. The divisions of the prophetical books already mentioned are read jointly with those of Moses, in the same manner. These latter divisions they- call Haphleroth, a term which signifies, in Hebrew, dismissions ; because after this read ing is over they dismiss the people. The Jews call the division of the Holy Scriptures into chapters, Perakim, which signifies fragments ; and the division into verses they call Pesukim, a word of nearly the same signification as the former. These last are marked out in the Hebrew Bibles by two great points at the end of them, called hence Soph-Pasuk, that is, the end of the verse. But the division of the Scriptures into chapters and verses, as we now have them, is of a much later date. The Psalms, indeed, were always. divided as at present ; for St. Paul, in his sermon at Antioch in Pisidia, quotes the second Psalm But as to the rest of the Holy Scriptures, the division of them into such cnapters as it present, is what the ancients knew nothing of. Some attribute it to Stephen Langton, who was archbishop of Canterbury in the reigns of King John and his son Henry the Third. But the true author of this invention, as is shown by Dean Piv deaux at great length, was Hugo de Sancto Caro, who, being from a Dominican monk advanced to the dignity of a cardinal, and the first of tha order that was so is com monly called Hugo Cardinalis. ' This Cardinal Hugo, who flourished about the year ,e?40, and died in 1262 had labored much in the study of the Holy Scriptures, anu iiade a comment upon the HISTORY OF THE BIBLE. 15 whole of them. The carrying-on o'f tnis work gave him the occasion of invent ing the first concordance that was made of the Scriptures — that is, of the vulgar Latin Bible; for, conceiving that such an index of all the words and phrases in the Bible would be of great use for the attaining of a better understanding of it, he pro jected a scheme for the making of such an index, and forthwith set a great number of the monks of his order on the collecting of the words under their proper classes in every letter of the alphabet, in order to this design ; and, by the help of so many hands, he soon brought it to what he intended. This work was afterward much improved by those who followed him, especially by Arlottus Thuseus, and Conradus Halberstadius, the firmer a Franc:scan and the other a Dominican friar, who both lived about the end of the same century. But the whole intention of tne work being for the easier finding of any word or passage in the Scriptures, to make it answer this purpose the cardinal found it necessary, in the first place, to divide the book into sec tions, and the sections into other divisions, that by these he might the better make the references, and the more exactly point out in the index where any word or pas sage might ,be found in the text ; and these sections are the chapters into which the Bible has ever since been divided. For, on the publishing of this concordance, the usefulness of it being immediately discerned, all were desirous to have it; and, for the sake of the use of it, they all divided their bibles as Hugo had done; for the references in the concordance being made by these chapters and the subdivisions of them, unless their bibles were so divided too, the concordance would be of no use to them. And thus this division of the several books of the Bible into chapters had its original, which has ever since been made use of in all places and among all people, wherever the Bible itself is used in these western parts of the world ; for before this there was no division of the books in the vulgar Latin bibles at all. But the subdivisions of the chapters were not then by verses as now. Hugo's way of subdividing them was by the letters A, B, C, D, E, F, G, placed in the margin at equal distances from one another, according as the chapters were longer or shorter. In long chapters all these seven letters were used, in others fewer, as the length of the chapters required ; for the subdivision of the chapters by verses, which is now in all our bibles, was not introduced into them till some ages after ; and then it was from the Jews that the use of it, as we now have it, took its original on the follow ing occasion. About the year 1430, there lived here among the western Jews a famous rabbi, called by some Rabbi Mordecai Nathan, by others Rabbi Isaac Nathan, and by many by both these names, as if he were first called by one of them, and then, by a change of it, by the other. This rabbi being much conversant with the Christians, and having frequent disputes with their learned men about religion, he thereby came to the knowledge of the great use which they made of the Latin concordance composed by Cardinal Hugo, and the benefit which they had from it, in the ready finding of any place in the Scriptures which they had occasion to consult ; which he was so much taken with,' that he immediately set about making such a concordance to the Hebrew Bible for the use of the Jews. He began this work in the year 1438, and finished it in 1445, being seven years in composing it; and the first publishing of it happening about the time when printing was invented, it has since undergone sev eral "editions from the press. The Buxtorrs, father and son, bestowed much pains on this work; and the edition of it published by them at Basil in 1632 is by far the most complete, and has deservedly the reputation of being the best book of the kind that is extant. Indeed, it is so useful for the understanding ofthe Hebrew scriptures, that no one who employs his studies in this way can have a better companion; it being the best dictionary, as well as the best concordance to them. In the composing of this book, Rabbi Nathan finding it necessary to follow the same division of the Scriptures into chapters which Hugo had made in them, it had the like effect as to the Hebrew bibles that Hugo's had as to the Latin, causing the same di visions to be made in all the Hebrew bibles which were afterward either written out or printed for common use ; and hence the division into chapters first came into the Hebrew bibles. But Nathan, though he followed Hugo in the division into chapters, yet did not do so in the division of the chapters by the letters A, B, C, &c, in the margin, but introduced a better usage by employing the division that was made by verse. This division, as already mentioned, was very ancient ; but it was till now ,without and numbers put to the verses. The numbering, therefore, of the verses in x6 INTRODUCTION TO THE the chapters, and the quoting of the passages in every chapter by the verses, were Rabbi Nathan's invention ; in everything else he followed the pattern which Cardinal Hugo had set him. But it is to be observed, that he did not number the verses any otherwise than by affixing the numerical Hebrew letters in the margin at every fifth verse ; and this has been the usage of the Jews in all their Hebrew bibles ever since, except that latterly they have also introduced the common figures for numbering the intermediate verses between every fifth. Vatalibius soon after published a Latin Bible according to this pattern, with the chapters divided into verses, and the verses so numbered ; and this example has been followed in all other editions that have been since put forth. So that, as the Jews borrowed the division of the books of the Holy Scriptures into chapters from the Christians, in like manner the Christians bor rowed that of the chapters into verses from the Jews. But to this day the book of the law, which is read by the Jews in their synagogues every sabbath day, has none of these distinctions, that is, is not divided into verses as the Bible is. The division of the books of Scripture into great and little sections, does, without doiibt, contribute much to the clearing up of their contents; and for this reason, as well as because they found it practised in the synagogues, the Christians also divided the books of the New Testament into what the Greeks call pericopes, that is, sec tions, that they might be read in their order. Each of these sections contained, under the same title, all the matters that had any relation to one another, and were solemnly read in the churches by the public readers, after the deacons had admon ished the faithful to be attentive to it, crying with a loud voice, "Attendance, Let us attend." The name of titles was given to these sections, because each of them had its own title. Robert Stephens, the famous printer, who died at Geneva in 1559, gets the credit of being the first who made the division of the chapters of the New Testament into verses, and for the same reason as Rabbi Nathan had done before him as to the Old Testament ; that is, for the sake of a concordance which he was then composing for the Greek Testament, and which was afterward printed by Henry Stephens, his son, who gives this account of the matter in his preface to the concord ance. Since that time, this division of the whole Bible by chapters and verses, and the quoting of all passages in them by the numbers of both, has grown into use everywhere among us in these western parts ; so that not only all Latin bibles, but all Greek ones also, as well as every other that has been printed in any of the mod ern languages, have followed this division. They who most approve of this division of the Bible into chapters and verses, as at present used, agree that a much more convenient one might be made; since it often happens that things which ought to be separated are joined together, and many things which ought to be joined together are divided. The respect which the Jews have for the sacred books, and which even degener ates into superstition, is one of the principal of their religious practices. Nothing can be added to the care they take in writing them. The books of the ancients were of a different form from ours ; they did not consist of several leaves, but of one or more skins or parchments sewn together, and fastened at the ends to rollers of wood, upon which they were rolled up ; so that a book when thus shut up might easily be sealed in several places. And such was the book mentioned in the Revelations, which St. John says " was sealed with seven seals," and which no one but " the Lion of the tribe of Judah could open and explain." The Hebrew manuscripts of the Bible are of two kinds — the rolled ones, or those used in the synagogues, and the square ones, or those which are to be found in pri • vate collections. The rules laid down by the Jews with respect to their manuscripts have undoubtedly tended much to preserve the integrity of the text. They are di rected to be written upon parchment, made from the skm of a clean animal, and to be tied together with strings of similar substance, or sewn with goat's-hair, which has been spun and prepared by a Jewess. It must be likewise a Jew that writes the law, and they are extremely diligent and exact in it, because the least fault in the world profanes the book. Every skin of parchment is to contain a certain number of columns, which are to be of a precise length and breadth, and to contain a certain number of words. They are to be written with the purest ink, and no word is to be written by heart or with the points ; it must be first orally pronounced by the copyist. The name of God is directed to be written with the utmost attention and devotion. and the transcriber is to wash his pen before he inscribes it on the parchment. If HISTORY- OF THE BIBLE. 17 ihere should chance to be a word with either a deficient or a redundant letter, oi should any of the prosaic part of the Old Testament be written as verse, or vice versa, the manuscript is vitiated. No Hebrew manuscript with any illumination is, on any account, admitted into a synagogue, although privaie individuals are permit ted to have them ornamented for their own use ; but in the illustrations, the resem blance of any animal denounced by the Jews as unclean can not be admitted. Among the modern Jews, the book of Esther, in particular, is frequently decorated with rude figures of various kinds ; but with respect to this book, it must be ohsei ved that, owing to its wanting the sacred name of God, it is not held in such repute for holiness as the other books are. The manuscripts for private use may be either upon parchment, vellum, or paper, and of various sizes. " There is," says Prideaux, " in the church of St. Dominic, in Bononia, a copy of the Hebrew Scriptures, kept with a great deal of care, which they pretend to be the original copy written by Ezra him self; and therefore it is there valued at so high a rate, that great sums of money have been borrowed by the Bononians upon the pawn of it, and again repaid for its redemption. It is written in a very fair character upon a sort of leather, and made up in a roll according to the ancient manner; hut it having the vowel-points an nexed, and the writing being fresh and fair, without any decay, both these particu lars prove the novelty of that copy. But such forgeries are no uncommon things among the papistical sect." To open and shut up the roll or book ofthe law, to hold it, and to raise and show it to the people, are three offices, which are sold, and bring in a great deal of money. The skins on wnich the law is written are fastened to two rollers, whose ends jut out at the sides, beyond the skins, and are usually adorned with silver ; and it is by them that they hold the book when they lift it up, and ex hibit it to the congregation ; because they are forbidden to touch the book itself with their hands. All who are in the synagogue kiss it, and they who are not near enough to reach it with their mouths, touch the silken cover of it, and then kiss their hands, and put the two fingers with which they touched if upon theit eyes, which they think preserves the sight. They keep it in a cupboard, which supplies the place of the ark of the covenant, and they therefore call this cupboard Aaron, which is the Hebrew name for the ark ; and this is always placed in the east end of the synagogue. He who presides chooses any one whom he pleases to read and explain the scripture, which was a mark of distinction; as we see in the thirteenth chapter of the Acts, where we find the rulers of the synagogue de siring the apostles, when they were in the synagogue, to make a discourse to the people. Ordinarily speaking, a priest began, a Levite read on, and at last one of tne people, whom the president chose, concluded. He who reads stands upright, and is not suffered so much as to lean against a wall. Before he begins, he says with a loud voice, "Bless ye God ;" and the congregation answer, "Blessed be thou, 0 my God, blessed be thou for ever;" and when the lesson is ended, the book is rolled up, and wrapped in a piece of silk. The Jews still retain so great a veneration for the Hebrew tongue, that they do not think it lawful to use any other bibles in the synagogues but such as are written in that language. This was what enraged them so much against the Hellenistic or Grsecising Jews, who read the Septuagint Greek version in their synagogues ; and so much were they grieved that this version was ever made,'that they instituted a fast, in which they annually lament this as a misfortune. But because the Hebrew was, after the captivity, no longer the vulgar tongue, there was an interpreter in the syna gogues, who explained to the people in the Chaldee, or common tongue, what was read to them in the Hebrew. The use thev made of the Scriptures, however, gave the people at least an imperfect knowledge if the Hebrew language. And thus we see the eunuch who is mentioned in the Acts, could read Isaiah, and understand enoup Ii of it to form the question which he put to Philip, concerning the passage in the prophecy relating to Jesus Christ. After having spoken of the books contained in the Bible, and of the divisions of those books which have been used by the Jews and the Christians, both in ancient ar.d modern times, it may now be necessary to examine a little into the language in which they were written. The Old Testament was originally written in the Hebrew tongue; and this language is generally considered as having the best claims to be considered the most ancient at present existing in the world, and, perhaps, as the 2 18 INTRODUCTION TO THE prinlc/al tongue of the human race. By the Hebrew language, therefore, is meff.nl that which was spoken by Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and the twelve patriarchs, which was afterward preserved among their posterity, and in which Moses wrote, it being improbable that he would employ any other language than that which was in use among the Jews. This language is supposed by some to derive its name from Heber, great-grand son to Shem, whose posterity were denominated Hebrews; but it is much more likely that it received its name from its being the mother-tongue of the descendants of Abraham, who were called Hebrews, not because they were descended from He ber, but because Abraham, having received a command from God to leave the coun try where he lived, which was beyond the Euphrates, passea hat river, and came into the land of Canaan, where the inhabitants ofthe country gave htm the name of the Hebrew, that is, one that has passed over ; in the same manner as the French call all those that live beyond the mountains, Ultramontanes. The reasons that demonstrate the antiquity of the Hebrew tongue are many. In the first place, the names which the Scripture explains are therein drawn from He brew roots. It was thus that the first man was called Adam, because he had been formed out of the ground, which in Hebrew is called Adamah. The first woman was called Eve, because she was the origin of life to all, evach in Hebrew signifying to live. The name of Cain, which comes from Canah, signifying to acquire, or gel, alludes to .what Eve said when he was born: "I have got a man from the Lord." The explanation of these names is not to be found in any language but the Hebrew ,' and as this relation between names and things does not occur in any other language, it is in it alone that we can see the reasons why the first human beings were so called. The names of an immense number of people, also, who are descended from the Hebrews, show the antiquity both of the nation and the language. The Assurians,"' for instance, derive their name from Ashur, the Elamites from Elam, the Arameans from Aram, the Lydians from Lud, the Medes from Madai, and the Ionians from Javan, who are all traced in the Hebrew bible to Shem, Ham, and Japhet. These names' have no signification in any language but the Hebrew, which shows that they are derived thence, as are also the ancient names of the pagan deities ; to which we must add the remark which several learned men have made, namely, that there is no language in which some remains of the Hebrew are not to be found. A very apposite example, in allusion to the meaning of proper names in Hebrew, is to be found in the Book of Ruth, toward the end of the first chapter, where it is said, "And the whole town was in commotion about them; and the women said, Is this Naomi ? And she said, Call me not Naomi (which means Delightful) ; call me Marah (which means Bitter) ; for the Almighty (Emer) hath caused bitterness ex ceedingly to me. I went away full, and Jehovah hath caused me to return empty; wherefore then do ye call me Naomi, since Jehovah hath brought affliction on me, and the Almighty hath caused evil to befall me?" Thus we see that in Hebrew, as well as in most of the oriental languages, ail proper names are significant words ; and this is found to be the case also among many of the nations of Afnca. This circumstance has a great effect in increasing the energy ofthe diction in ihese tongues; for it not unfrequently happens, as in the case of Naomi, that the speaker or writer, in addressing a person by his name, makes use of it at the same time as a word of ordinary signification, to express something in the inward disposition or the outward circumstances of the possessor. Instances of this occur in almost every page of the Hebrew scriptures ; and, as may readily be supposed, it is impossible in such cases, for any common translation to do justice to the energy of the original. We have a very remarkable example of this in the twenty-fifth chapter of 1 Samuel, at the twenty-fifth verse, in which Abigail, speaking of her husband Nabal, says to David : " Let not my lord set his mind al all now toward the man of Belial (that is, worthless), mis same person, Nabal (which means a scoundrel) ; for like his name so is he; Nabal is his name, and Ne- belah (that is, vileness) is with him." In speaking ofthe meaning of proper names, however, the most extraordinary ex ample, perhaps, that can be produced from any book, either ancient or modern, is the following, which is to be found in the fifth chapter of Genesis : the names of the ten antediluvian patriarchs, from Adam to Noah inclusive, are there given ; and when these ten names are 1 orally translated, and placed in the order in which'thev occur- HISTORY OF THE BIBLE. 19 they form altogether the following very remarkable sentence in English: man, ap pointed, miserable, lamenting, the God of glory, shall descend, to instruct, his death sends to the afflicted, consolation ! We need not be surprised, therefore, at what is mentioned in the Spectator (No. 221), of a certain rabbinical divine having taken the first three of these names as the subjeet of his discourse, forming thus the text of a regular sermon. " We had a rabbinical divine in England," says Addison, " who was chaplain to the earl of Essex in Queen Elizabeth's time, that had an admirable head for secrets of this nature. Upon his taking the doctor of divinity's degree, he preached before the university of Cambridge upon the first verse of the first chapter of the First Book of Chronicles, 'in which,' says he, 'you have the three following words: 'Adam, Sheth, Enosh.' "He divided this short text into many parts, and by discovering several mysteries in each word, made a most learned and elaborate discourse. The name of this pro found preacher was Dr. Alabaster, of whom the reader may find a more particular account in Dr. Fuller's Book of English Worthies." It is evident, that although this matter appeared ridiculous enough in Addison's eyes, so as to furnish him with a theme for a very amusing paper, yet, on considering attentively the meaning of the original words here used as proper names, a great deal of very sound doctrine might be elicited by a subtile divine, even from such an ap parently insignificant text. In the same way the names of animals in Hebrew are found to be words expressive of their qualities, which gives support to the idea that this was the language which Adam used when he gave them their names ; as we find recorded in the second chapter of Genesis, at the 19th verse: "And Jehovah God formed out ofthe ground every beast of the field, and he formed also every lowl of the heavens ; and he broughl them unto Adam to see what he would call them, and whatever Adam called it — the living creature — it is its name." Some ofthe names of animals in Hebrew are still found to be clearly descriptive of their qualities, and therefore in regard to what animal is intended there can in such cases be no dispute. But with respect to some others the matter is not so plain, as, from the root not being now found in the language, the ideal meaning of the name can not be so readily ascertained : and hence the eleventh chapter of Leviticus, in which the names of certain clean and unclean animals are enumerated, presents difficulties to a translator of no ordinary description. There is, perhaps, no language in the world so easily reduced to its original ele ments as the Hebrew. As Wilson has well expressed it, " We descend from words to their element; and the accurate knowledge of letters is the principal part of He brew grammar. Its flexion nearly approaches (hat of the modern languages, par ticularly the English. The relations and dependan es of nouns are not distinguished by terminations, or cases, but by particles or prepositions prefixed. The persons, moods, or tenses, of verbs are not marked by the changes of their last syllables, bui by means of letters of a particular order, which sometimes appear in the middle, sometimes in the beginning, and sometimes in the end of the original word." In fact the structure of the Hebrew language is peculiarly favorable for the expression of energy and sublimity. The words, as is well known, are remarkable for short ness, the greater part consisting of not more than two, three, or four letters ; few words have more than ten letters, and those that consist of that number are not many. The sentences are also for the most part short, and are quite free from that complexity which is apt to embarrass the reader when perusing even the best authors of Greece and Rome. The idiom of any language consists in the order of the words ; but it is well known that, in this respect, the Greek and Latin tongues are extremely capricious, the words being arranged in them not in the order of the understanding, but ofthe ear, according to the sound rather than the sense. The Greek and Roman writers place the emphatic words in whatever order the sentence can be made to run most musically, though the sense be suspended till the speaker or reader come to fhf and; and hence the need of so many flexions and syntax-rules for a learner to arrange them to find out 1ne meaning. Yet even for this purpose more declensions than one were not necessary ; nor more tenses than three, a past, a present, and a future. From this mass of perplexity the Hebrew language is entirely free. Its original Words, called roots consist of a proper tiuro^er of letters, commonly three, the fewest 20 INTRODUCTION TO THE that make a perfect number ; and they express an action finished or expressed by a sinsae aeeni. It has a proper number of voices, that is, active, passive, and medial — and only the tenses that are in nature. Its primitive words are more sentimental and st ientific than sonorous ; aud they express original ideas, being definitions of things descriptive of their natures. The Hebrew, Greek, and Latin, and such as are immediately derived from them, or constructed on their model, are the only languages that are formed on a regular artificial plan ; and all other tongues of which we know anything, except perhaps the Persian and the Sanscrit, must be considered in comparison as mere gibberish, being quite rude in their original formation; nor is it possible to reduce them to another state, without wholly metamorphosing them. That which was never the language of a cultivated, learned people, and in which there are no literary works of taste, can not be a polished language, although it may have been the language of a civilized nation, or of a court, if they were only an illiterate people. In a word, all languages that have a concourse of consonants, or silent letters, are rude in their writing or pronunciation, whatever their structure may be. The Greek and Latin are free from the latter fault, and the Hebrew from both. "As Solomon possessed the most wis dom and knowledge," says Mr. Ray, "and treated all subjects of natural philosophy, Sfc, and his court being the most splendid and elegant, as people came to it from all nations, and greatly admired it, the Hebrew must be a copious, elegant language ; and its structure is invariable, being the same in Moses and Malachi, at a thousand years' distance." In speaking ofthe genius of a language, indeed, which is its force, vigor, or energy, the Hebrew, may, without doubt, be said to excel all. It is evident therefore that if, as Longinus observes. " saying the greatest things in the fewest words" he essential to simplicity and energy in discourse, the Hebrew is the best language in the world for the purpose. In it we have no superfluous parts of a sentence in words, or even in letters. A Hebrew writer conveys his meaning without circumlocution; for, although he were inclined, he would be unable to ac complish il, because the language is quite unsuitable in its nature for being employed in ^ny such way; and therefore if an author's subject be good, even although he should possess but little genius, he will find no great difficulty to clothe his ideas in sublime and energetic language, if he write in Hebrew.* Such is the simple nature of the formation of this primitive language, and which seems, at the same time, to entitle it more to the claim of being a philosophical tongue than, perhaps, any other in the world. It is remarkable that the structure of this very ancient language approaches closely to that of the English, and other modern tongues, as the relations and dependances of nouns, according to what has been already remarked, are not distinguished by terminations, or cases, as in Greek and Latin, but by particles or prepositions (or little words) prefixed, and which are, at the same time, conjoined with the noun, as if they were a part of it. The advantages which the Hebrew language possesses, above all others, in the simplicity of its formation — its remarkable originality, in that it borrows from no language, while almost all others borrow from it — as also the ideality which is found 10 pervade its roots or primitive words — have all been considered as entitling it to higher claims in the consideration of philosophers, than any other language in the world, either ancient or modern. These notions have been carried to such a length, indeed, by some learned men, that they gave rise to an entirelv new school of philosophy, generally known by t.he designation of the Hutchinson'ian ; the disciples of which are remarkable as beino; opposed in many things to the Newtonian system, and as being possessed with the belief that in the Hebrew language, and in it alone, are to be found the germes of all true philosophy. INTEGRITY OF THE TEXT. The sacred books which were written, as we have seen, in Hebrew, ihe langunge ofthe patriarchs, have been preserved down to our days without any corruption ; and * Tlie Bible was composed, says Prof. Lange, in the two leading Ianeua?ea of Rntfnnit*. «.^:„*. - a ... «.„ ;ra«est contrast in the intellectual world. The Hebrew tongue m - bf ch ^acLrizX^T <*«'*«' «» aud child-like, as the deepest, purest, and most direct language of ^rituaUxTer\ences rtSS.'SS*^ Hi most ou tivated, renued, aud philosophical expression of intellectual life.— Eii, ' e """=* HISTORY OF THE BIBLE. 21 he same judgment may also be formed of those other books of Scripture which have been since written in Greek. But before proving the purity and integrity of these original texts, it may be necessary to remove a prejudice which may arise from the variety of different readings that are found in the manuscript and printed copies of the Bible. The different manner in which some passages are expressed in different manu scripts, together with the omission or insertion of a word, or of a clause, constitute what are called various readings. This was occasioned by the oversights or mistakes of transcribers, who deviated from the copy before them, these persons not being, as some have supposed, supernaturally guarded against the possibility of error ; and a mistake in one copy would, of course, be propagated through all that were taken from it, each of which copies might likewise have peculiar faults of its own, so thai various readings would thus be increased in proportion to the number of transcripts that were made. Besides actual oversights, transcribers might have occasioned various readings by substituting, through ignorance, one word, or even letter, in place of another; they might have mistaken the line on which the copy before them was written, for part of a letter, or they might have mistaken the lower stroke of a letter for the line, and thus have altered the reading; at the same time they were unwilling to correct such mistakes as they delected, lest their pages should appear blotted or defaced ; and thus they sacrificed the correctness of their copy to its fair appearance. Copyers, seem not unfrequently, to have added letters to the last word in their lines, in order to preserve them even, and marginal notes have been sometimes introduced into the text. These different circumstances, as well as others with which we may not be acquainted, did no doubt contribute very much to produce and multiply mis takes and variations in the manuscripts of the Hebrew scriptures. This language is more susceptible of corruption, and any alteration would be more detrimental in ii than in others. In English, if a letter be omitted, or altered, the mistake can be easily corrected, because the word thus corrupted may have no meaning ; but in He brew, almost every combination of the letters forms a new word, so that an alteration of even one letter of any description is likely to produce a new word and a new mean ing. Thus putting all alterations made knowingly — for the purpose of corrupting the text, out of the question — we must allow that from these circumstances connected with the transcribing, some errata may have found their way into it, and that the sacred Scriptures have in this case suffered the fate of other productions of antiquity. When we have collected all the differences that are found in manuscripts of the original text, and have selected from them what are really various readings, we are able to determine, from the number and authority of the manuscripts, with tolerable correctness, what is the genuine reading. Beside the authority of the manuscript, we must also be guided in determining the true reading by the scope of the passage, by the interpretations and quotations of ancient writers, by the old versions, and not un frequently by Scripture itself; for similar or parallel passages will often be found useful for this purpose. When all these things are considered, it. will seldom happen that the true reading of a passage will be doubtful ; yet should it continue so, either reading may contain a truih, though certainly both can not be authentic, and in a theological point of view, either of them may be followed without involving a doc trinal error; and in such a case, the common reading should not be relinquished. To a person who has not considered the subject closely, it may appear sufficient to overthrow the authority of the text, that no less than thirty thousand various readings of the scriptures of the Old and New Testaments have been discovered. But when these are examined closely, and all that are not properly various readings are rejected, the number will be considerably diminished; from these again let all be deductel which make no alteration in the several passages to which they refer, and the reduc tion will be much greater ; and out of the remainder there are none found that can invalidate the authority of those doctrines that have been esteemed fundamental, or that can shake a single portion of that internal evidence whereby the divine origin of the Scriptures is supported ; so that the friends of revelation had no grounds for the alarm they felt at the time when the subject of various readings began to be discussed. These observations apply strongly to the New Testament, which, as it ha« been transcribed more frequently, and probably by less skilful transcribers than the Old, lias, in proportion, many more various readings. Respecting these, however, it has Oeen said, that " all the omissions ofthe ancient manuscripis put together, would not 22 INTRODUCTION TO THE countenance the omission of any essential doctrine of the gospel, relative to faith or morals ; and all the additions countenanced by the whole mass of manuscripts already collated,, do not introduce a single point essential either to faith or morals, beyond what may be found in ihe Complutensian or Elzevir editions.* The manner in which the original text of the Scriptures, particularly the He; brew, has been preserved free from all material corruption, and handed down pure through such a long succession of ages, may now form the subject of our especial, con sideration. It has been supposed by many that the Christian fathers accused the Jews of cor rupting the text ;, bill from an examination of such passages as seem to imply this, it appears that they spoke not of corrupting the text,, but of adopting unfaithful transta tions. Justin Martyr, one of the most celebrated of the Christian fathers, defends the Itws very well as to this point, and proves that they have not corrupted the Scrip- lures : and it is past doubt they have not ; for, as St. Jerome observes, before the birth of Jesus Christ they had certainly made no malicious alterations in them. If they had done so, our Saviour and his apostles, who cast so many reproaches upon the scribes and Pharisees, would not have passed over in silence so great a crime. To suppose such a thing, indeed, were to know little of the attachment of the Jews tor the Scriptures. Josephus and Philo assure us that they would have undergone all sorts of torments rather than have taken a letter from the Scripture, or altered a word, in it. A copy which had only one fault in it was by them thought polluted,, and was not suffered to be kept above thirty days; and one thauhad four faults, was ordered to be hid in the earth. In the Babylonian Talmud it is laid down as a regulation, that " the books of the law which have beeu written by a heretic, a traitor, one who is a stranger to the Jewish religion, an idolatrous minister — by which they mean a monk— a slave, a woman, one under age, a Cuthsean, or Christian, or an apostate Israelite, are unlawful." " This," says St. Augustine, " is a most visible effect of the providence of God over Lis church. It pleased him that the Jews should be our librarians; that, when the Pagans jeject the oracles of the ancient prophets concerning Jesus Christ, which we quote against them as being invented by us, we might refer them to the enemies of, )ur religion, whp will show them in their books the same prophecies, which we quote against them." The class of Jewish doctors called Massorites were grammarians, who engaged with peculiar ardor in the revisal of the Hebrew scriptures. The Massoritic, notes and criticisms relate to the verses, words, letters, vowel-points, and accents. , All the verses -of each book and of each section are numbered, and the amount placed at the end of each in numerical letters, or in some symbolical word formed out of them ; the middle verse of each book is also marked, and even the very ietters are numbered; and all this is done to preserve the text from any alteration, by either fraud or neg ligence. For instance, Bereshith, or Genesis, is marked as containing 1,534 verses, and the middle one is, at — " And by thy sword thou shalt live" (xxvii. 40). The lines ire 4,395 ; its columns are 43, and its chapters 50. The number of its words is 27,713, and its letters are 78,100. The Massoritic notes, or Massorah, as the work is called, contain also observations on the words and letters of the verses ; for instance, how many verses end with the letter samech; how many there are in which the same word is repeated twice or thrice ; and other remarks of a similar nature. It SPtms now generally agreed upon that the Massorites of Tiberias, during the, fourth century of the Christian era, were the inventors of the system of the vowel- points and accents in the Hebrew Bible ; and although they multiply them very un necessarily, it must be allowed that this is the most useful of their works. From the points we learn how the text was read in their time, as we know they were guided inj,afhxing them by the mode of reading which then prevailed, and which they sup posed .to have been traditionally, conveyed down from the sacred writers. The Massoritic notes were at first written in separate rolls, but they are now usually placed, in the margin, or at the top and bottom of the page in printed copies. Many opinions are entertained about the authors of them ; some think they were be gun by Moses : others regard them as the work of Ezra and the members of the "real synagogue, among whom were the later prophets ; while others refer them entirely .o the rabbins of Tiberias, who are usually styled the Massorites, and suppose thai ' Vide Dr. Adam Clarke's Tract on the Editions of the New Testament, and also the Critical FillrlniM of the New Testament, by Tichendorf, Ur. iieury Alford, and Dr. S. P. TregeUes.-J&L "*' tll'Uo"" "* HISTORY OF THE BIBLE. 23 they commenced this system, which was augmented and continued at diffc rent times by various authors, so that it was not the work of one man, nor of one age. It is not improbable that these notes were begun about the time of the Maccabees, when the Pharisees, who were called the masters of tradition, first began to make their obser vations on the letter of the law though they were regardless of its spirit. They might have commenced by numbering first the verses, next the words and letters; and then, when the vowel-points were added, others continued the system by making observa tions on them. On the whole, then it appears that what is called the Massorah is entitled to no greater reverence or attention than may be claimed by any other human compilation ; but, at the same time, it must be allowed that it has preserved the Hebrew text from the time it was formed, and conveyed it to us as perfect as any ancient work could be given. ¦ The various readings given in the Hebrew Bibles, and which are technically de nominated by the Jews the Keri and Cetib, are not to be ascribed to Moses or the prophets, for it can not be supposed that inspired writers were ignorant of what was the true reading of the scripture text. One principal occasion of the notes of the Keri and Cetib is, that there are several words which the Jews, either from super stitious reverence or from contempt, are never allowed to pronounce. When they meet with them in the text, instead of pronouncing them, they pronounce others that are marked by certain vowels or consonants in the margin. The chief of these is the great name of God Jehovah, instead of which they always read Adonai, Lord, or Elohtm, God. This is the word called Tetragrammalon, or the ineffable name of God, consisting of the four letters, Yod, He, Wau, He. The people were not suffered to pronounce it ; the high-priest alone had that privilege, and that only in the temple once a year, when he blessed the people on the great day of atonement ; and hence il is; that, as this holy name has not been pronounced since the destruction of the tem ple, its true pronunciation i