ERSITY LIBRARY 07089 Q "IS've Oufe Saoki , for Hut fai^ruUng if a. CoUegt in. if^X^elbnf 'Y^ILE<'¥]MU¥EI^SIIir¥- THE HAVANA ICE-HOUM CONTROVEKSi:. immmmtii^ THE HAVANA ICE-HOUSE CONTROVERSY : FACTS versus FALSEHOOD, IN BEOARD TO TEANSACTI0N9 BETWEEN FREDERIC TUDOR AND JOHN W. DAMON. BOSTON: PBINTED FOR THE AUTHOR. 1846. INTRODUCTORY NOTICE. Most of our countrymen having business with Havana, and many who are nowise connected with the place, have heard of the IcE-HousE Controversy, in which a distinguished gen tleman of Boston has been involved, through the ingratitude and treachery of a man of no note, an obscure mechanic, who, owing his fortune to the generous confidence and liberality of that distinguished gentleman, had made the same return that JEsop tells us the viper did, when he struck his fangs into the bosom by which he had been warmed into life. The distinguished gentleman is Frederic Tudor, Esq., of Boston, who, to the personal superiority of birth and education, which confers so many advantages in a contention of this sort, unites the many other advantages flowing from a numerous fam ily connection and a large circle of influential friends in the_ higher walks of life. The ingrate who is said to have thus re quited Mr. Tudor's generosity, bears the obscure name of John W. Damon, which, whatever may be deemed its claims to respect among those who know him, can scarcely be expected to carry with it, into circles to which he is estranged, any weight against the representations of Mr. Tudor, his family and his friends. But, fortunately for the cause of Justice, the voice of Truth can receive from the Press a force which, bearing down all ob stacles, makes it heard and respected even in regions where oth erwise it could not penetrate. In the belief that this will happen in the present case, the following Statement of Facts is put into the shape requisite to becoming generally known. It is founded entirely upon extracts from Mr. Tudor's own letters, and other documents in his handwnriting. And these ma terials will be seen not only to establish their own authenticity, but to be of a nature to establish also the truth of the narrative by which they are connected. CONTENTS. Pagn. Chap. I. Statement of the Case now pending between Mr. Tudor and my self. — Necessity for recurring to the Partnership formerly existing be tween us, 9 Chap. II. History of the former Partnership between Mr. Tudor and myself, 12 5 1. 1821-3. Antecedent Relations between us, 12 § 2. 1823. Partnership proposed by Mr. Tudor. — Terms of his Proposal examined. — Points established by them, 13 ^ 3. 1824. Partnership formedwith Mr. Tudor.— The BiU of Saleand Con tract conveying to me one-fifth part of the Ice- House, &c., is written by him. — Bearing of this Fact upon his Conduct afterwards in attempting to avail himself of the alleged worthlessness of this Document. — The Tenor of the Document examined, and its Meaning ascertained, with reference to Mr. Tudor's subsequent Pretensions. — Fact that the Priv ilege, of which he sold me a part, had no existence, 20 44. 1824-30. Difficulties in which I found myself involved as Mr. Tudor's Partner. — Expiration of his Privilege. — Obstacles to its Renewal. — His Anxiety and Efforts to obtain it. — New Lot for an Ice-House. — Necessity for obtaining one. — Mr. Tudor's " Instructions" on the subject. — His in sulting Deportment and baseless Charges. — Management of the Ice- House. — Mr. Tudor's insulting, groundless, and ever renewing Charges of Neglect of Duty. — His Pretension to reduce my Compensation. — Mis sion of his brother Henry. — I retire from the post of Ice-House Keeper in April, 1830. — Extraordinary Game played by Mr. Tudor on this sub ject. — The Charge of the Ice-House temporarily resumed by me in Au gust. — More of Mr. Tudor's Self- Contradictions. — New Privilege ob tained August, 1830. — More again of Mr. Tudor. — My Position at the close of 1830. — I depart for Boston, 30 1831. My Visit to Boston, Jan., 1831, and its unexpected Result. — New Document from Mr. Tudor. — Its Nature considered. — His Diplo macy. Acknowled_gments contained in his Proposals. — The State of his Exchequer, and the consequent Necessity of my Return to Havana for an indefinite Period. — Mode in which the Money borrowed of me was repaid. — Intrinsic Value of this Payment considered. — His last Move in the Game commenced by him in 1829, respecting my ten per cent. Compensation.— His Letter of March 23, 1831.- Accuracy of his Portrait, as painted by himself. — My Return to Havana, April, 1831,- • • • 63 1831-33. Site for the Ice-House obtained,— Its Nature. — Conditions attached by Government to the Permission to Build. — New Ice-House built. — Breach of Faith on the part of Mr. Tudor in regard to the Cost. — Difficulties with which I had to struggle whilst building the House.— —-- ^Want of Funds. — Mr. T.'s Dunning for Remittances. — His Coffee and Sugar Speculations. — 111 Health compels me to leave, July, 1833. — Mr. T.'s subsequent " Generosity" on this subject, 87 1834. My Return to Havana, Feb. 1834. — New Difficulties with my Partner. — Consequences of the heavy Advances made by me. — His In struction forthwith to reduce the Price of Ice. — My Departure for Bos ton in October, 1834. — Purpose of my Visit. — This Ground of Difference between us is abandoned by Mr. Tudor, and his old Pretension to Re duce my Compensation is substituted in its Place. — New Discove ries made by him, in regard to the Nature of my Rights and Obliga tions, and New Positions assumed by him. — Alternative presented to me, to acquiesce in his old Pretension and new Positions, or submit to the Confiscation of my Property, 107 1835-6. My Return to Havana in March, 183.5.— The Person placed by me in charge of the Ice-House refused to allow me to resume it, and holds out as the Agent of .Mr.Tudor. — My Visit to Boston in May, 1835. — Mr. Tudor's Refusal to listen to me. — Legal Proceedings instituted by me. — Decision of the Jiic: Avenidor in my favor. — Decision of the Tri bunal of Commerce in my favor. — Appeal taken by Mr. Tudor to the Alzadas. — The Case remanded back to the Tribunal of Commerce. — Pending these Proceedings, Mr. Tudor pockets my Money. — The Case carried by me int) the Supreme Court. — Possession of the Ice House restored to me in November, 1836, by Sentence of the Supreme Court, 120 Nov. 1836 to July '37. Deplorable Condition of the Ice-House, and imminent Risk of the Penalty of $4000 for a Failure of Supply. — Mr. Tu dor's Treachery. — Arrival of his new Agent, Mr. Bacon, with a Cargo of Ice. — His Demand and Stratagem, and the Result. — Provisional Agreement with Bacon, — He refuses to sign Receipts, for Money tendered to him for Mr. Tudor.— All Differences between Mr. Tudor and myself referred to Arbitration. — Delays interposed by Bacon. — His last Proposal.— His Death.— Mr. Tudor's Determination to renew Litiga tion.— His Letter of January 11, 1837.— My Letter of December 17, 1836. —My Letter of February 1 1 , 1837.— My subsequent Letters, 127 § 10. July to Dec. 1837. Mr. Tudor's determination " to drop Law as he would a hot iron." — His Letter of July 8, 1837. — My Replies, August 23, 25, and 28, and September 1. — His Letters of September 22, and October 6.— My Reply, October 21.— His Letter of October 12.— My Reply, No vember 11. — His Letter of October 26. — My Reply, December 3. — His Letters of November 15and IS, pressing for further Remittances. — Cir cumstances under which this Demand is made. — My Reply, December 21. — His Letter of Dec. 1. — His new Declaration of War, December 16. — Falsity of the Pretext on which he puts it. — Artifice used by him to give it Plausibility. — Misstatements respecting his own Letter of Oc tober 6 — Suit instituted by him at Boston. — His Letter of December 18. — Peremptory Order to reduce the Price of Ice. — Circumstances under ¦which it is given. — My Reply, January 6. — Review of the Year 1837,- • 155 § 11. 1838. Last Year of the Privilege obtainedj^n J830.— I apply for a Re- ^ newal of the Privilege, and inform Mr. Tudor of it. — Measure adopted be me to secure to him and myself our respective Shares therein, on the same terms on which we had originally become connected. — He makes no Reply to my repeated Inquiry, whether he consents to become a Par ty to the now Privilege. — My Application is granted by the Authorities ; but the Business of closing the Contract with them is kept in suspense by me, waiting for Mr. T.'s Answer. — An Answer finally extorted from him. — Its Character. — Power of Attorney from him, and Letter accom- panyingit. — Insufficiency of the former and treacherous Nature of both.— This Answer leaves me no Option but to close the Contract in my own name. — Mr.T. informed of this and that I am still willing to admit him. — He despatches Mr. Fenno to Havana, as his Attorney. — Nature of the Power under which F. is sent to act. — Proof embodied therein, of Mr. T.'s Non- Acceptance of my Offer, and of his treacherous Designs. — Set tlements of Accounts with Fenno. — Fenno returns to Boston. — Conflict between our Statements respecting what had passed between us on the subject of the new Contract. — Circumstantial Evidence in Support of the Truth of my Statement. — More of Mr.T.'s Treachery. — New Attach ment on my Property at Boston. — Bills drawn by him. — My Offer to purchase his Share of the Building erected in 1831-3. — Demolition of the Building ordered by the Captain General. — Absurd Calumny on the subject.- Suit instituted by Mr. T. at Havana, 185 CONTENTS OP THE APPENDIX. (A.) Contract between John W. Damon and the Authorities of the city of Havana. 225. (B.) "Memorandum of Proposal to Mr. J. W. Damon," from Frederic Tudor, May, 1823. 226. (B. B.) Bill of Sale from Tudor to Damon. 228. (C.) Renewal of the Privilege. — Extracts from Damon's Letters to Tudor, showing the trouble and anxiety about the Privilege. 229. (D.) Mr. Tudor's_;?rsf Pretext for confiscating one half of Damon's stipulated Compen sation. — " Improper Letters." — His Munificence illustrated. — He "endeavors to be particularly moderate," and levies upon my one-fifth Share a Tax of no more than $tOO per annum. — Service of keeping and remitting his Money thrown upon me, and peiformed gratis. — Loss of a Remittance of $400 charged to my Account. — Cabbage Commissions charged, and Dog's-Meat Charges dis allowed. 234. (E.) The post of Ice-House Keeper relinquished by'me, April 17, 1830. — Resumed temporarily, August 27. — Again relinquished, December 21. — Game played by Mr. Tudor in regard to this matter, and kept up by him for a twelvemonth. — Our Correspondence renewed by him. — His Love for Strict Discipline exem plified.— My Notification to him regarding Payment of certain Notes of his held by me.— Novel Illustration of the legal Doctrine of" Set-off." 242. (F-) Extracts from my Letters, showing the extraordinary Non-committal Game played by Mr. Frederic Tudor towards his Attorneys, Messrs. Scull, Storey & Co and towards myself, in regard to the closing of the Contract for the Renewal' of the Privilege, which Game terminated with his Letter of December 10 1830 announcing that all Connection between us had ceased, and that he did" not accept the new Contract." 260. (G.) First Settlement of Accounts'between Mr. Tudor and myself.— A Sample of mv Trials in this respect. 266. i ' '"r THE HAVANA ICE-HOUSE CONTROVERSY. CHAPTER I. Statement of the case now pending between Mr. Tudor and myself. — Necessity for recurring to the Part nership formerly existing between us. On the 23d day of August, 1838, a public contract (a) was entered into by me (John W. Damon) with the Ayuntamiento (City Council) of Havana; whereby, upon the terms and con ditions therein set forth, I acquired, for the term of ten years from the 1st of January, 1839, the exclusive privilege of supply ing said city with ice. Mr. Frederic Tudor, of Boston, has advanced a claim to be considered my partner in said contract, as the owner of an inter est of four fifths of the same. Such is the nature of the legal confroversy now pending be tween us ; and the only point presented by it is, the simple question : whether said Tudor is, or is not, a partner in said con tract. I It requires but litlle knowledge of the principles of law, to perceive, that the decision of this question cannot, legally, any more than by the rules of logic and the dictates of common sense, — in any manner depend upon any partnership which may formerly have existed between the same parties, nor upon the line of conduct which may have been pursued by either of them towards the other. Neither can it depend upon the ques tion, whether, in obtaining said contract for myself alone, to the exclusion of said Tudor, I did or did not fulfil the obligations (a) See Appendix (A.) 10 of good faith towards him. Let it be supposed, that, in the as sociation formerly existing between us, Mr. Tudor had been defrauded by me to ever so great an amount. Add to lhis sup position the further supposition, that, in obtaining said contract for myself alone, I had abused the confidence of Mr. Tudor, and acted towards him wiih the utmost ill faith. Still, il would be an incontrovertible truth, that these facts, or any possible facts of this nature, however strong and however flagrant they might be against me, could not have any proper connection with the question just stated. They might be of a nature to subject me, before the Tribunal of Public Opinion, to the severest reproba tion ; and before the Tribunals of Law, to the most condign personal punishment, and the most onerous pecuniary retribu tion in favor of Mr. Tudor, slill ihey could not affect the ques tion, whether that individual is, or is not, a partner in a certain Public Contract, entered into under all the formalities prescribed by law, with the Ayuntainiento of Havana. To this question, they would be altogether irrelevant and inapposite. This incontrovertible truth is apparently too simple and obvi ous to be ovei'looked. Unfortunately, however, for the cause of justice, the case now pending between us has not been permitted to remain in the state proper lo its true nature. This was too simple to allow scope for those misrepresentations, upon the vague and undefined influence of which Mr. Tudor could alone build any hope of sympathy from men of probity, or any hope of success to his cause. No advocate retained to maintain that cause, could fail to see at a glance, the impossibility of sustain ing a pretension so unfounded and so preposterous, if presented in its own naked shape, and made to rest upon its own naked merits. Hence the necessity, on his part, of complicating and confusing the subject, until the true nature of the case should be merged and buried out of sight, in a mass of matter altogether foreign to it. For this purpose has the history of the anterior relations between Mr. Tudor and myself been resorted to, and ransacked for incidents calculated to awaken sympathy in his favor ; to produce the impression that he has been a wronged and injured man ; that but for ill faith on my part, he v:ould have been a partner in the contract; and that, consequently, viewed in the light of natural justice, his is the right side of the controver sy. A picture has been presented of a generous and magnani mous patron, belonging to the higher order of society, taking by the hand an obscure mechanic, " a poor miserable carpenter," befriending him, confiding in him, and thereby raising him from his native insignificance and poverty, to importance and wealth ; and after thus proving his benefactor, experiencing at his hands ingratitude, treachery and fraud. 11 Such is the picture that has been presented, to supply the place of argument appropriate to the nature of the case ; because the nature of the case was such as to preclude the possibility of any thing in the shape of a fair, open and direct argument in support of the affirmative of the question. Such is the purpose for which subjects entirely irrelevant to the case, have been in troduced; and the history of my previous association with Mr. Tudor, and the alleged demerits of my conduct towards him, have been substituted for the simple point which presented itself for discussion and decision. This course on the part of Mr. Tudor and his advocates, has imposed upon me the necessity of meeting them on their own ground. True, it is as little in my power as in theirs, to change the essential nature of the case now pending between us; or to make its decision turn upon the truth or the falsity of their repre sentations respecting the conduct observed by me towards Mr. Tudor, or upon any other irrelevant matter. The law, — framed, as it is, in accordance with the dictates of reason and common sense, — pronounces those representations to be irrelevant to the case; and that, whether true or false, they cannot influence the decision of the case. It is not in my power to control the laws, and\ to say, that upon these matters, irrelevant though they be, the decision shall be made to turn. Nevertheless, though I can not substitute the truth or the falsity of these representations for those points upon which the law has predetermined that the case shall turn, I can meet my antagonist on his own ground. I, too, can recur to the past relations between Mr. Tudor and myself. In the place of those fictions, by which he has sought to divert the course of law and justice, by exciting antipathy against me, and sympathy in behalf of himself, I can, and I will, give the truth. This will have the power to confound, if not to silence, him. This will show, that so far from his having any ground for complaining of fraud or ingratitude at my hands, the ground for such complaint lies entirely on my side. This will show that I have acted towards him with the utmost forbearance and delicacy ; with forbearance carried to the very last extreme, under every possible provocation from arrogance and injustice. It will belong to the reader to judge, whether, so far as Mr. Tudor's interests have suffered, they have not been made to suffer by himself, and no one else; whether the effect was not inevitable, and whether this effect can be traced to any other cause than his own inordinate selfishness and despotic temper; to any other cause than qualities in himself, precipitating him into a course of injustice, duplicity and treachery, as well as a career of wanton and senseless litigation ; some of his steps in which could be 12 dictated by sheer malice and vindictiveness alone, so remote and so uncertain was their bearing upon the only beneficial result he could promise himself from any part of the proceeding — that oi intimidating or harrassing me into the surrender of my property and my rights, at his dictation. CHAPTER II. History of the former Partnership between Mr. Tudor and myself. § 1. — 1821 - 23. — Antecedent relations between us. The Partnership by which it has been the mutual misfortune of Mr. Tudor and myself to be connected, as owners of the Havana Ice House, and purveyors of ice to that city, began in the year 1824. For some years previously, I had been in his employ at vari ous places and in various capacities, — beginning with that of carpenter, — relating to the ice business, which he is known lo have established and successfully prosecuted in many parts of the world. Among those places was the city of Havana ; from the au thorities of which he had, early in the present century, if I mis take not, obtained a Privilege for the introduction of ice; and this business having been broken up by the war of 1812-15, between the Uniled States and Great Britain, it had, two or three years after the restoration of peace, been resumed under a new Privilege ; in connection wilh which, he had obtained from the same authorities permission to erect a building upon public ground in the Plaza San Francisco, on the express condition that it should be demolished and removed by him whensoever this should be required by them. At the close of the year 1821, — as is shown by Mr. Tudor's letter to me of the 14th December, 1821,-1 was selected by him as his agent, to proceed to Havana and take charge of the ice house ; the compensation fixed for my services being '^ ten per cent, upon the gross sales of ice." 13 § 2. — 1823. — Partnership proposed by Mr. Tudor. Terms of his proposal examined. Points establislied by them. In May, 1823, Mr. Tudor, being then at Havana, proposed to me to become his partner, upon the terms set forlh in a docu ment (see Appendix B) which I yet possess, in his handwriting, bearing date May 5, 1823, and headed, ^^ Memorandum of Pro posal to Mr. J. W. Damon." This document is, as will be seen in the sequel, of great value. It is fraught with conclusive proofs in regard to the nature and terms of the understanding and agreement, upon which I after wards became Mr. Tudor's partner ; proofs which preclude all doubt respecting the injustice of the attempt made by him at a long subsequent period, and respecting the falsity of the ground assumed by him in regard to the nature of the rights acquired by me in acceding to his urgent wishes. I will here extract a part of it : ''I will sell one tenth of the ice-house, and rights appurtenant, for $3000, payable in 1, 2, and 3 year.-, with interest. The sale lo be made the 1st of January next, say when you are in Boston. Or I will contract to sell you the same share for one dollar at the end of the term proposed below, together with another tenih for three thousand dollars, if you arc willing to return here, [Havana] conducting the business as at present, and remain here two years and a half, that is to say, three summers. You will then have one fifth of the concern for $3000 paid. ' It is understood, when a partner in the concern, you are to undertake to look after tlie business; and, when it shall be necessary, to come here, [Havana.] Although you would, per haps, do this for your own interest, it is necessary to me that it should be agreed for. " Afier you have accomplished the time which I am desirous you. should remain here, you are, in your occasional visits, to be allowed say $2 a day, during your absence from Boston on the business. " At the termination of the present year, you will be better able to know what the business will, in all probability, amount to, and 1 make the pioposition to you absolutely, and give you the offer of accepting it, until the 1st of January next. " It is my wish to keep you here in good pay, for some time, {aa) (aa) Considered apart from the rest of the proposal, this would seem to imply, that my right to be employed. " conducting the business as at present," was to be limit ed to "some time;" which words refer, of course, to the term before specified. This interpretation is, however, precluded by the context. That proves the mean- 14 and not asking you to run risks, but making you the one dollar offer and ihe further right of purchase at the termination ot the 3 summers for $3000 to complete your fifth interest, although it may be worth more. If it is worth less, you are not bound to take it. .^ . r " By a steady conduct of the business, with a unilormity oi supply, you will know what the business ought to be ; and the agent who may be subsequently appointed be checked by the records of five years which will be known to be correct. " It is no object to me to sell, unless all the personal attention which may be necessary here, [at Havana,] shall be given by the purchaser, with an allowance as above slated, for his expenses To be relieved from personal attention to the business, parlicu- larly here, is very desirable to me. " The present house is guaranteed to stand against being removed by ihe authorities of the place, for three years ; (b) and the new house to be built at the expense of my four-fifths; your fifth, instead of paying, is lo be made up by your attention to the erection, and the concern charged with the $2, unless you are here selling ice as at present." Mr. Tudor winds up by saying, " Should you return home in December with a view of coming out here again, I am willing to be charged two doubloons if you come by the way of Balti more or Philadelphia, rather than by the way of Cape Cod in that stormy season." This shows how solicitous Mr. Tudor was about my personal safety, in the event of my leaving Havana, " at that stormy season," with an intention of contimdng in his service, or of becoming his partner. The previous extracts serve to establish points which Mr. Tudor's subsequent course renders it necessary ing of the present passage to be, not that my right in this respect was to be so restricted, but that Mr. Tudor would be satisfied with securing my services for the period named by him. This was all that he asked in exchange for what he offered to give; and beyond that period, my continuance in the post was to be optional with me alone. It will be seen in the sequel, that he attempted to reverse the matter in both re spects ; by asserting that, agreeably to what he had " all along understood," he had an absolute right to deprive me of the employment at any moment he might see fit, whilst I was bound to reside at Havana so long as he might please so to " order." (6) What right he had to give any such guarantee, and how far it was effectual to secure my peace and quiet, will appear in the sequel. It will be seen that the only ground which his guarantee had to rest upon, was in liis doctrine, that, "in a Spanish country, possession is more than nine points in the law," and that although he had no right, (and was under a solemn engagement to remove, so soon as the authorities should give the word,) it would require the whole power of the King of Spain to dispossess him in less than six years ! And this doctrine I was " in structed" lo enforce!! [For the letter in which this doctrine is particularly set forth, see § 8.1 15 that the reader's attention should be specially called to. It is seen, that, 1. First. Mr. Tudor here proposes to " sell one tenth of the ice house and rights appurtenant, for $3000, payable in 1, 2, and 3 years with interest ; the sale to be made on the 1st of January, 1824." The only stipulation on my part required by him is, that, " when a partner in the concern," I should look after the business; and, for the purpose of doing so, visit Havana when this should be necessary. 2 Secondly. Mr. Tudor makes another proposal, to wit : that, if I should be " willing to return here, [Havana] conducting the business as at present, and remain here two years and a half, that is to say, three summers," he would bind himself by contract, to sell me, at the expiration of that term, one tenth for one dollar, and another tenth for $3000. " Conducting the business as at present, " meant, at the compen sation of ten per cent, upon the gross sales, which had been fixed in 1821, and had continued ever since. Here, then, Mr. Tudor offers, that if I would continue at Havana in his service during "three summers" more, my compensation for so doing should be, not only the ten per cent, upon the gross sales which I was then receiving, but, in addition thereto, the ownership of "one tenth of the ic3-house, and rights and appurtenances." This is what he was willing to bind himself to sell me '¦\for one dollar" in other words, to give me, at the end of the two years and a half Moreover, as a further inducement slill, to pass these three summers at Havana in his service, and as a further compensation for so doing, it was to be optional with me, at the expiration of the term, to purchase or not, at my pleasure, another tenth of Mr. Tudor's "ice-house, rights and appurtenances," for the sum of $3000. He would bind himself to sell it for this sum, however great its value might by that time have become ; whilst, on the other hand, should it be worth less, I was not to be " bound to take it." In regard lo this second offer, as in regard to the first, the only stipulation on my part, required by him is, that, when a partner in the concern, I should look after the business ; and, for this purpose, visit Havana when necessary. It is to be observed, that by the words " when a partner in the concern," nothing else could be meant by Mr. Tudor, nor understood by me, than this, to wit : v}hen the sale which Mr. Tudor proposed to make, should have taken place, supposing his first offer to be accepted by me, then the sale was " to be made on the first of January next," [1824.] Supposing his second offer to be the one accepted by me, then he was immediately to 16 " contract to sell ; " and the sale itself was to take place at thS expiration of the term of two years and a half. In either case, so soon as the sale should be effected, Mr. Tudor would have ceased to be the owner of the share sold by him in " the ice house and rights and appurtenances ; " and I being the pur chaser, would have become the owner. And he remaining the owner of one part, [four-fiftiis] whilst I had become the owner of the other part, [one fifth] I would necessarily be, ipso facto, " a partner in the concern." It is to be observed also, that the stipulation requiring me to reside at Havana had no application to the time when I should have become " a partner in the concern." My residence at Havana for the " three summers" was the consideration, which, in the event of my accepting the second offer, was to be given by me in payment of one of those two tenths, the other of which was to be paid for in money ; and under this one of the two proposed arrangements, I was not lo become a partner until after this term of residence should have expired. Agreeably to the first of the two proposed arrangements, I was to become a partner " on the 1st of January next." In neither case was I, after becoming a partner, to be under any obligations to reside at Havana ; I was merely to visit it "when necessary." [bb.) 3. Thirdly. As a further inducement to me to accept his pro posal, Mr. Tudor offers to guarantee that there shall be no necessity to procure a new site for carrying on the business until the expiration of three years. 4. Fourthly. And finally, as another inducement yet, he engages that, if I will consent to become proprietor of one fijth of the concern, the new house shall be built at his sole charge, as owner of the remaining four fifths ; the personal " attention to the erection," which I was to give, being considered as an equivalent for the contribution to which my one fifth would otherwise be subject, (c) (bb) It may perhaps occasion surprise, that so many words should be bestowed upon points, in themselves so perfectly obvious. This surprise will, however, cease, or at least receive a new direction, when the reader is informed of the fact, that abusing the reliance pl.iced by me in his good faith, in permitting him to write the document whereby this proposal was carried into effect, and 1 became his partner, Mr. Tudor, at a subsequent period, (in 1835,) denied my ownership of any part of the concern; maintaining that my interest of one fifth depended entirely on my continued residence at Havana; or, as he expressed it, was •'essentially founded on your residence m Havana;" that I was bound, on penalty of its instant forfeiture to continue to reside there as long as he might choose, whether it should or should not please him to " give " me the post of ice-house keeper, or whether it should or should not suit me to hold it, on such terms of compensation as he miuht nlease to fix ! a i- (c) Such was the obligation contracted by Mr. Tudor, when intent upon inducinff me to become his partner. Aftei- this object had been secured, as will be seen in 17 5. Fifthly. Though evidently anxious to secure my constant personal attendance at Havana, as deemed by him highly impor tant to his interests, Mr. Tudor limits his requirement in this respect to the term of two years and a half. It was for this term of residence, that he proposed to compensate me by selling me a one tent/i interest for one dollar, besides allowing me the ten per cent, upon the gross sales during that term, and engaging to exempt my share in the concern from all pecuniary charge for the erection of the new house, which was to be our common property in the proportion of four fifths, and one fifth. After this term of residence should be fulfilled, I was to be at liberty to reside at Boston, or wherever I liked. After that, I was to be bound only to visit Havana when it should be necessary to give to the business there that personal attention, from the burthen of which, Mr. Tudor wished to be relieved ; and, in these " occa sional visits," I was " to be allowed, say two dollars a day during your [my] absence from Boston on the business." But, although Mr. Tudor did not require me to reside at Havana for a longer period than the two years and a half, the same motives which prompted him to offer me the inducements held out as my compensation for that limited residence, — these same motives existed for his wishing that I should continue to reside at Havana after that period. This wish iv as -entertained and expressed by liim. And, suppose that it should be acceded to by me ; suppose, that, at the expiration of this limited period, I should be willing to prolong my residence at Havana indefi nitely, in charge of our joint property and business; what was then to be the compensation for my services ? This question finds an answer in the passage of Mr. Tudor's proposal just under consideration ; that which relates to the building of the new house. It is to be observed, that he here guarantees that there shall be no necessity for a new house until after the expiration of the " three summers" for which I was to engage to reside at Havana. When the new house should be constructing, I was to give my "attention to the erection," in lieu of that contribution in money which would otherwise be due from me as the owner of one undi vided fifth of the establishment. But was the compensation for my services, previously stipulated for, to continue during the the sequel, and after " the new house to be built," had been built, and not only my "attention," but the work of my hands, given "to the erection;" when all this was past and done, Mr. Tudor insisted that the expense should not be charged to his four fifths, but to the whole concern, including my one fifth! And in this in stance, as in others of the same kind, he carried his point, through my strong re pugnance to have recourse to that remedy which, on occasions of the sort, was pointed out to me by the phrase, " the courts are open." 3 18 time I should be thus giving my "attention to the erection?" Mr. Tudor engages that it should continue; and this engage ment is so expressed by him as to afford an answer to the ques tion which now occupies us. He says, that during the period that the house should be building, "the concern" should be "charged with the two dollars, unless you are here selling ice as at present." That is to say, if, at that future time, I should have ceased to reside at Havana, then and in that case, I was to repair to Havana for the purpose of superintending the erection of the new house, and whilst so engaged I should receive the per diem allowance of two dollars, previously mentioned in Mr. Tudor's memorandum. But, if my residence at Havana should not then have ceased, in this event I would still be " here, selling ice, as at present;" in other words, at ilie compensation of ten per cent. upon the gross sales. Although the document contains no formal stipulation upon this point, we here see, therefore, proof in regard to the wishes and intentions of Mr. Tudor, and the assurance held out to me by him. He did not require me to reside at Havana longer than the two years and a half; but, if at the expiration of that period, I should be willing to continue to reside there, he would ask no thing better than that I should so continue on the same terms "as at present," receiving for my compensation the " tenper cent. upon the gross sales of ice." It is true that this assurance was not given with reference to any determinate period. Mr. Tudor did not expressly stipulate that this rate of compensation should continue all my life, or so long as I might continue disposed to reside at Havana. But neither did he fix any limit to its duration. And, taking every thing into consideration, the anxiety so strongly evinced by Mr. Tudor to secure my services, and particularly lo induce me to become his partner; the gift of one tenth part of the concern, and the exemp tion of my share from all charge for the cost of the new house, — both of which were held out to me as inducements, ouer and above the compensation of ten per cent, on the gross sales, to agree to reside at Havana merely for three summers, — taking all this into consideration, no candid person wifl, I think, feel inclined to dispute, that the mode in which this assurance from Mr Tudor was understood by me was the mode in which I had a rio-ht to understand it, and in which it would naturally be understood by everyone, to wit: that, unless something altOi;ether unforeseen and extraordinary indeed should happen ; unless the nature of the business, or of its profits and results, should become in a most remarkable degree different from what it then was, or could then be anticipated to become ; unless this ground for a chano-e 19 should occur, the ten per cent, compensation was secured to me so long as I should be willing to reside at Havana, in charge of the business. 6. Sixthly. The interest here proposed to me by Mr. Tudor is not merely in "the ice house, and rights appurtenant," actually existing and possessed by him at that time ; but it is prospective, and embraces a share in all rights arising from any future renew al of the Privilege, and in the appurtenances and property, "new house " and all, to be connected therewith. The interest which he wishes me to purchase is a permanent interest ; to endure so long as he might continue to hold the Privilege ; or, should he fail to obtain its renewal, then, so long as he might continue to be engaged in the ice business at Havana. Just so long as he should have the right to carry on that business, and the ability and disposition to do so, just so long was a share in his right and his business and the appurtenances (including the " new house") to be mine. This results necessarily from the very nature of the proposal, when considered with reference to the nature of the business and property to which it relates. It is directly proved by the terms in which the proposal is expressed, and most particularly and irrefragably proved by certain parts of the proposal. Take, for instance, that part which relates to the building of the " new house." Mr. Tudor offers to guarantee that we shall not be disturbed in the occupancy of the existing house for the space of three years. It was not until after this period, that the new house was to be built, or, at any rate, was to come into use. Now, without entering here into the question how long his exist ing Privilege {d) might then have yet to run, it is evident that un less the unexpired portion of it was very considerable indeed, he could not have thought of incurring all the trouble and expense of building a new house, except with a view to continue the busi ness after the term of the existing Privilege should have expired. On any other supposition, of what use would the new house be to him ? or how could it be an object to me to own one fifth of it? (d) Not to complicate the subject, I speak here as if Mr. Tudor, at that time, really possessed a Privilege. This was my belief at the time. The truth of the matter, as will hereafter be seen, is, that he had no Privilege. This existing Privilege, which Mr Tudor sold me a share of in 1824, was More-existent. It will also be seen in the sequel, that, in the face of this fact, and of the entire tenor of his own pro posal, Mr. Tudor, some years afterwards, (in December 1830,) actually had the conscience to threaten me with litigation upon the point now under consideration : saying, that it should " be determined by the lawyers," whether, " at the end of the old contract with the Government," (a contract which had actually expired — although he left me to find this out for myself afterwards — before our connection commenced) he was not at liberty to say, that our connection was terminated, and I no longer had any interest in the concern ! 20 Again, on comparing Mr. Tudor's two offers, it is seen that by the one he oroposes to sell one tenth on the 1st of January, 1824, for the sum' of $3000 ; and by the other, to sell that same share, three years after the 1st of January, 1824, for the same sum of $3000. Now, this valuation of the same share at the same price, in 1824 and in 1827, (when the existing Privilege would have three years less to run) is manifesfly inexplicable on any other supposition than this, to wit: that it was Mr. Tudor's expectation to obtain a renewal of the Privilege when it should expire, or his intention to confinue the business, whether he ob tained the renewal or not; and that the interest which he proposed to sell me was a permanent interest, embracing all future rights, &c., as weU as those then existing. § Z. — 1S2A. — Partnership formed loith Mr. Tudor. The BUI of Sale and Contract, conveying to me one fifth part of the ice house ^c, is ivritlen by him. — Bearing of this fact upon his conduct afterwards, in attempting to avail himself of the alleged worthlessness of this Document. — The tenor of the Document examined, and its meaning ascertained, with reference to Mr. Tudor's subsequent pretensions. — Fact, that the Privilege, of which he sold me a part, had no existence. Partnership formed. Mr Tudor's proposal bears date early in May, 1823, and allowed me " until the first of January next," — that is to say, eight months' additional experience of the nature and value of the business, — to come to a decision. So little ambitious was I of the honor of becoming his partner, that I periTiitted this long term to expire without availing myself of his offer. After its expiration, as is shown by the memorandum written by Mr. Tudor's hand at the foot of his original proposal it was renewed by him and again declined by me. A few days after, however, in an evil hour for me, I finally allowed myself to be persuaded into a step which, limes without number, he has given me cause to regret most sincerely. On the 29th of Jan uary, 1824, we became partners ; and my little fortune became so bound up with the fitful capriciousness ; the domineering, dic tatorial, contumelious spirit; the reckless injustice, and the wanton vindictiveness of Mr. Frederic Tudor, as to place me for the better part of my life under the necessity of bearing the trials to which these qualities subjected me, as the only alterna tive to abandoning to his greed the property earned by the sweat of my brow, and saved by my frugality, that frugality which, congenial to my character, but contrasting wilh the princely expenditure appropriate to his, was once made by him the 21 subject of friendly remonstrance, in the shape of the conde scending remark, " Damon, you do n't spend enough." Having made up my mind to become his partner, I preferred to become such absolutely, and at once, by the present definitive purchase of that one fifth share wdiich he had proposed to me to acquire by paying for it, partly by the two years and a half resi dence at Havana, and partly in money at the expiration of that term. In other v/ords, I accepted his^rs^ offer; wilh the modifi cation merely of purchasing one fifth instead of one tentli, and paying $6000 instead of $3000. This, it is to be observed, left me free in regard to my residence at Havana. On referring to the foregoing examination (§ 2) of the terms of Mr. Tudor's pro posal, it will be seen, that ray obligation to reside at Havana was to exist only in case of my binding myself to render my services for "three summ;'rs," in payment of one half of my fifth part. By paying for the entire fifth part in money, ($6000, instead of the proposed $3000,) I remained free to reside at Ha vana only so long as it might suit me so to do, the only thing obligatory upon me in this respect being, that " when necessary" I should visit Havana, for the purpose of looking after the busi ness, with the conduct of which at Boston Mr. Tudor charged himself. Bill of sale. — The arrangement being completed by the payment of my money for a part of the sum, and the giving of my promissory note for the balance, it followed, as a matter of course, that I should receive in return, some evidence of the rights acquired by me ; some written proof that I had become interest ed in the business and property, as the owner of one fifth part, and entitled to the administration at the ten per cent, compensa tion. And here, Mr. Tudor's superiority in point of education came into play. Being nothing but a "poor miserable carpenter," — a fact since adduced to the Tribunals on behalf of Mr. Tudor, in proof of the justice of the allegation that the property now possessed by me must be due, not to the industry and frugality to which he knows it to be due, but to a course of treachery and fraud by which he has been the sufferer, — being at that time nothing but a " poor miserable carpenter," my hand was necessarily more familiar with the saw and plane than expert with the schol ar's implement, — the pen, — or conversant with the tricks of the law and the niceties of legal conveyances ; and the task of drawing up the document which was to serve as proof of the transaction between us naturally devolved on the hand of Mr. Tudor. The understanding and agreement between us was perfectly clear and explicit, and I had no distrust whatever of Mr. Tudor's rectitude 22 and fair dealing. I took for granted that the instrument written by him was, — as it seemed to me to be, — sufficient for every purpose ; and it was signed and exchanged between us, without a thought on my part that any mischief could ever grow out of the confidence thus reposed in him. The idea did not enter my head, that this document could ever give rise lo questions as to its meaning; or, supposing it should leave room for such ques tions, that Mr. Tudor was capable of desiring to take advantage of anything of the sort. This document wifl be found in the Appendix, (B. B.) In the eye of those skilled in the law, (which, by the way, Mr. Tu dor, at a subsequent period, tauntingly told me " is a very differ ent thing from equity,") in the eye, then, of those skilled in the law, as contradistinguished from equity, it may, — as Mr. Tudor has since maintained that it does, — amount to nothing at all; it may secure to me neither the ownership of the fifth part sold to me, nor that right to the custody and care and management of the property, on the strength of the assurance of which I consented to become a purchaser. In a word, it may in all respects leave me entirely at the mercy of his generosity and magnanimity. If this really be its character, I can only point to the document enti tled " Memorandum of Proposal to Mr. John W. Damon," and, having done so call upon Mr. Tudor's generosity and magna nimity, his justice and veracity, all combitied, lo testify to the point, whether this supposed worthlessness of my Title-Deed was the result of design on his part, at the time it was drawn up by his pen ; or whether it is only of late years that he has become conscious of it and has intended to avail himself of it. Let him depose and say, whether, at the time of drawing it up, he inwardly intended that it should not carry into effect ihe agreement between us, founded on his own written proposal; or whether its alleged inefficacy for any such purpose be a com paratively modern discovery of his or his lawyer's, and the de sign to avail himself of it a design growing out of that discovery. Upon this point, he, of all men living, has the best right to speak. Upon this point, his testimony alone is worth inore than the combined testimony of aU men living besides. To him, therefore, does it belong, — emphatically belong, to decide it. Not so, however, in regard to that alleged worthlessness of the Tille-Deed written by Mr. Tudor, which was subsequenUy sup ported by him, and asserted by him, to leave me entirely at his mercy. This is a point upon which his testimony is worthies.?, absolutely worthless. The Title-Deed must speak for itself, and if it leave room for doubt, other sources of evidence than Mr. Tudor's words, — unless, indeed they operate against himself, 23 must be had recourse to. Fortunately, however, this Tifle-Deed, is in all points save one, a very good' document in itself; nay, a perfect document: for, save in that one point, it is sufficiently clear and explicit to preclude all doubt respecting the true terms of our agreement, and therefore to answer all the substantial ends of justice. And even for this one defective point, a remedy is afforded by letters subsequently written by Mr. Tudor; so ihat there is no necessity for appealing to his previous " Memoran dum of Proposal." Its terms examined. The present document is seen to read as follows : " In consideration of six thousand dollars paid to me by John W. Damon by his note of hand and money, I do hereby sell to him one fifth part of the ice-house and its appurtenances, together with the like proportion in any privilege from the Gov ernment of Havana, where the ice-house is situated ; this inter est commencing on the first of January, 1824." Next comes the following qualification and stipulation : " This sale does not extend to heirs or assigns ; but in case of any misfortune, whereby said J, W. Damon cannot render any aid to the concern, then any money paid by him for the said fifth may be refunded to his representative by F. Tudor, the grantor, or his heirs ; but not in case J. W. Damon should re main in good health." What is the precise meaning of all this ? Its meaning is. First. That this is not to be understood to be an absolute sale, giving to said Damon a right to assign or sell his fifth part, or to his heirs a right to succeed thereto. But, is this qualification made absolutely ? Is it made without reference to possible contingencies and without provision for those contingencies ? Suppose, for instance, that said Damon should by loss of health, be incapacitated from giving any atten tion to the business ; is he, even in such case, to be precluded from seffing his interest? Or suppose him lo die the very next day after the purchase ; are his heirs to lose even the money he has paid for it ? Not at ah. No such absurdity as this was ever consented to by said Damon, nor (at that time) ever intimated by said Tu dor. No such absurdity is expressed in the document. Nor is it even left to be implied, as might have been the case, had it merely said, " This sale does not extend to heirs or assigns." The document expressly precludes any such implication, by providing expressly for both cases. It says. Secondly. That, in either case, it shall be optional wilh said " Tudor or his heirs," (they " may,") to refund " any money paid 24 by" said Damon. This expression, ^^ any money paid," having reference to the fact, that all the six thousand dollars had not been paid down, but a part of it was yet to be paid, and might still remain unpaid when said contingencies should have oc curred. To whom is this money to be refunded ? It is to be refunded to the ''representative" of said Damon. This word applies in differently to assigns or to lieirs ; and the stipulation, therefore, embraces both cases. But why is it left optional with said " Tudor or his heirs " to refund the money ? Why is it thus expressly stipulated that the money " raay be refunded" by them ? Is it because, — suppos ing Damon's fifth part to lapse to them absolutely by the event of his death or other misfortune, they would not have been at perfect liberty to indidge their generosity by refunding said money; and this stipulation was necessary to give them that liberty? We must either adopt this absurd reason, or we must adopt the only one which remains, to wit : that the stipulation has this meaning, and no other, that it should be optional with " Tudor or his heirs " to refund the money, or let Damon! s fifth part go to his heirs or his assigns, as the case might be. In other words, in the event of the death of Damon, or of his ina bility " to render any aid to the concern," they should have tlie right to purchase it back at the price ivhich he had paid. Next, come those words that have been referred to as the only part of the document which leaves room for doubt in regard to the precise nature of the agreement of which it is the expression. The above passage says. Thirdly. " But not in case J. W. Damon should remain in good health." What does this inean ? To what does this word "mo<" refer? What is it that was not Xo be, in case Damon should preserve his health ? This is a question that can be set- fled only by referring to what precedes, and applying the present negative stipulation to all those which from their nature are sus ceptible of being controlled by it. By pursuing this course, we arrive at the conclusion that this part of the contract means : In lhe/r.s^ place, in favor of Tudor : That if Damon preserves his health, he shaU not have it in his power to force upon Tudor or his heirs the alternative of refunding the money or admitting a new partner as the purchaser of his (Damon's) part. That is to say, that the expression " any misfortune wherebv said Damon cannot render any aid to the concern " shafl not be considered as meaning ah possible misfortunes attended with such effect. but solely his death, or the loss of his health. In these two cases alone, shall Tudor or his hehrs be under the alternative obligation 25 to refund the money, or admit as a new partner the heir of Da mon or the person to whom he may sell his part. No matter what misfortune may happen to Damon, rendering it impossible for him to " render any aid to the concern," this misfortune shall not, if he " remain in good health," give him any right to say to Tudor or his heirs, " you must pay me back my money, or aUow me to seU my part to some one else." So long as he shall re tain his health, he cannot sell his part except by the free consent of Tudor or his heirs ; he must retain it. In the second place, in favor of Damon : that so long as he shall live, absolute inability, through loss of his health, to " render any aid to the concern," shall be the only thing which shall give to Tudor or his heirs the right to say to him, " We wall refund you your money and resume the part sold to you." He must be incapacitated by ill health to render any aid to the concern, before the right just reserved to them, to refund his money and resume his share, shall exist. No dissalisfaclion on their part, no alleged ground of complaint regarding mismanage ment by him, or regarding the insufficiency of the aid rendered by him, shaU be sufficient to give them the right to deprive him of his share as a partner, even on refunding his money. That this was the true meaning of our agreement, so far as regards this point, is proved by a letter written by Mr. Tudor only a few months after, (May 14th, 1824.) In this letter, after complaining that my attention was given to other matters, and that the business of the ice-house was greatly neglected by me, he proposes that, if I was determined to persist in this course, I should relinquish my situation as ice-house keeper. And suppose me to do so, what then ? Suppose me to refuse to con form to his views in regard to the degree of attention due by me to our joint business ; and on this ground of disagreement, tr relinquish my situation : would my share be forfeited ? Would this alleged neglect, and my relinquishment of the charge of the ice-house, give him even the right to turn me out as a partner ? Not at all. He says to me, — if you will persist in attending to other business, why do so, " but give up your situation to another^ AND RETAIN YOUR FIFTH." That is to Say, although making bitter complaints of what he considered gross misconduct on my part, — • misconduct so very gross as to justify him in calling upon me to relinquish the charge of the property and business in which I owned an interest, — yet he acknowledged my right to retain my fifth and continue to be his partner. One other part of this document, — and a very important one it is, — remains to be examined : " Mr. Damon goes to Havana, and is to charge the concern 4 26 ten per centum for his services and remittances and other neces sary care of the business ; the same as last year." This, let it be remembered, is a part of the contract. It is not a mere memorandum, or letter from Mr. Tudor, such as I had formerly received from him, when, as his mere agent, I had gone to Havana to take charge of his business at the compensation agreed upon between us. It here constitutes an integral part of the deed of bargain and sale, signed by both, and exchanged between us. Formerly, when the stipulation here expressed had passed between Mr. Tudor as my employer, and me as his agent, our respective legal rights under it depended upon the law re garding that relation ; with certain restrictions and qualifications, dependent upon the particular circumstances of the case, he possessed the right to cease to employ me, to withdraw from me both the employment and the compensation, at any time he saw fit ; and I had a corresponding right to throw up the employment. But now, the case is different, this stipulation here stands as an integral part of that covenant whereby he had become the ven der, and I had become the purchaser of a permanent interest in a particular piece of property ; and our respective rights depend upon essentially different considerations and rules. In regard to these rights, several questions present themselves. First Question. Supposing said Damon disposed to continue at Havana in charge of the ice-house, rendering the services and receiving the compensation agreed upon, for how long a period would he have a right to do so ? For how long a period would said Tudor (supposing no just ground of complaint on his part to exist) be under obligaflon to aflow said Damon to continue in charge of the property and business and to receive the compensation ? One thing is perfecffy manifest, to wit: that this part of the arrangement and bargain might have been the chief inducement on the part of Damon, to enter into it and become owner of the share purchased by him. At any rate, it must, untfl the contrary be made to appear, be considered as an essential part of that in ducement. Consequently, until tlie contrary should be made to appear, it could not be optional with Tudor to set it aside at any time he might please. But this is a negative merely; and the question is of a nature to require an answer in the positive form. It will be recollected that the point now before us has already been examined, (see i 2 ) when the fifth point settled by Mr. Tudor's proposal was under consideration. The conclusion to which its examination there led us, if just there, must be so here. It is, that, unless sometliing altogether unforeseen, and very extraordinary indeed, should hap- 27 pen; unless the nature of the business, or of its profits and results, should become in a most remarkable degree different from what it then was, or could then be anticipated to become ; unless tliis ground should arise for qualifying tlie operation of this stipula tion, THE CHARGE OP THE PROPERTY AND BUSINESS, WITH THE COMPENSATION SPECIFIED, WAS SECURED TO SAID DaMON SO LONG AS SAID BUSINESS SHOULD CONTINUE AND HE SHOULD CONTINUE DISPOSED TO RESIDE AT HaVANA AND COMPLY WITH HIS OBLIGA TIONS. Second Question. Supposing said Damon to become unwil ling to continue to reside at Havana ; for how long a period would he be under obligation to do so, if required by said Tudor? Here, as in regard to the first question, it is manifest, that this obligation on the part of Damon might have been the chief in ducement on the part of Tudor to sefl. At any rate, it must, until the contrary be made to appear, be considered as an essen tial part of that inducement. Consequently, until the contrary should be made to appear, it could not be optional with Damon to set it aside at any time he might please. The question then arises, can the contrary be made to appear ? It can ; and this, in several ways. In the first place, the total silence of the document is a strong evidence of it. Had it been a part of the agreement that Damon should continue to reside at Havana so long as Tudor might require it, the latter could scarcely have omitted to stipu late expressly for a thing so important to him. The more impor tant this right, on his part, to require Damon to reside at Havana, the greater the improbability that he would have omitted expressly to secure it and place it beyond question. Even leaving out of view the important fact, that the document was written by Tudor's own hand, its silence is far more expressive against his right to require Damon to continue at Havana, than against the right of Damon to retain charge of the business. In the second place, there is a part of the document which, as far, perhaps, as it is possible for a negative to be proved, does prove that Damon did not contract any such obligation. The part alluded to, is the one already examined ; where it is stipula ted, that the obligation on Tudor or his heirs, to refund the purchase-money or permit Damon to sell out his share to a third party, should not exist so long as Damon remained in good health. This stipulation, as we saw when it was under examin ation, is in truth, a mere qualification of a previous part of the same sentence, which, unless so qualified, would have imposed said obligation upon Tudor and his heirs " in case of any mis- 28 fortune whereby said Damon cannot render any aid to the concern." And, taking the whole together, it manifesfly involves an acknowledgement, that, agreeably to what was in contempla tion of the parties, Damon might, for other causes than the loss of heahh, (though this would be the only one giving him a right to seU without the consent of Tudor,) find it impossible to " render a»^ aid to the concern;" in other words, find it neces sary no longer to reside at Havana. This was evidenfly in contemplation of the parfles : and yet it is seen that the contract does not provide any indemnity to Tudor, in case Damon should, at any time, declare that he " cannot render any aid to the con cern ; " — a thing which it could not have failed to do, had the agreement between the parties, of which this contract is the expression, imposed any such obligation. The only restriction upon Damon, in regard to rendering or not rendering " any aid to the concern," is, that unless his not doing so should arise from inability, and that inability be caused by loss of health, he would have to continue to be a partner in the business so neg lected by him. We see then, that the interests of Tudor, — so far as these might be affected by Damon's personaFattention to the business, — are not left by the contract altogether without security. On the contrary, this double security is provided for them, to wit : first, the charge of the property, and the compensation of ten per cent, operating on Damon as one inducement; and, secondly, the necessity of continuing to be a partner, whether he remained in charge of the property or not, operating on him as a further inducement, both to continue at Havana, and to do all he could for their joint interests. — And containing as it does, these securities for a disposition on the part of Damon to continue at Havana for an indefinite period, whilst it does not contain any stipulation giving to Tudor the least shadow of right to require him to reside there against his will, the contract affords a double presumption, that, agreeably to the understanding and agreement between the parties, Tudor did not possess any such right, but, on the contrary, had contented himself with the double security just named. In the third place, the justness of this view of the bearing of the tenor and import of the contract upon the point in question, is confirmed and put beyond doubt, by Mr. Tudor's " Memoran dum of Proposal." This shows, that the utmost that he ever proposed in regard to my binding myself to reside at Havana, was, for " three summers," and that, in consideration of my binding myself to even this limited residence, he offered to give me one tenth part of the concern. The document now before us shows that my entire fifth part was paid for in money. 29 Thus, then, is it proved, that the arrangement under which I purchased that fifth part did not place me under any obligation to reside at Havana, but left me free to give up the charge of the establishment whenever I should see fit. Mr. Tudor's " Memorandum of Proposal," serves to establish one point in his favor, also ; a point which was never disputed by me ; but which, had I entertained a disposition to contest it, he would have appealed in vain to the contract to establish. The point to which I allude is, that conformably to our under standing and agreement, although Iwas not under any obligation whatever to continue to reside at Havana a moment longer than it should suit me so to do, yet I was under the obligation " occasionally" to " visit " Havana, " when necessary." Suppos ing I should become unwilling to continue in the post of ice house keeper, and that it should be voluntarily relinquished by me, (which supposition implies that Mr. Tudor's obligation in this respect has been faithfully observed,) I would still be bound to spare Mr. Tudor the necessity of visiting Havana for the purpose of giving to the business " the personal attention which may be necessary here, at Havana." This obhgation I did enter into ; but, as before remarked, had I felt disposed to put Mr. Tudor to the proof of it, he would not have been borne out by the contract. Privilege non existent. Before taking leave of this docu ment I will call attention to the legal skill, — may be only an attempt at legal skill, — which, in one point, it evinces. It is to be observed, that Mr. Tudor so words his biU of sale as to avoid asserting positively, that he does oivn that Privilege in which he had induced me to buy an interest from him. He says, " I do hereby seU to him one fifth part of the ice-house and its appurtenances, together with a like proportion in any Privilege from the Government of Havana, where the ice-house is situated." Now, the fact was, — as I discovered, to my cost, very soon after my return to Havana, — that he did not own " any Privi lege." He had once owned one, but it had expired ! Suppose, that, on making this discovery, I had returned to Bo-ston, and cafled Mr. Tudor to account before one of those Courts, charged speciaffy, as lawyers tefl us, with cases of ''fraud, accident and trust." Would he not have been compelled to refund me my money, even although I should still "remain in good health?" Or would the Court have allowed him to take refuge behind the quibble, that his bfll of sale had not contained any positive averment that he owned a Privflege ; but, on the contrary, that all he had sold me was an interest in " any Privilege," which he might own, or might not own, as the case might, in truth, be? 30 § 4. — 1824-30. — Difficulties in which I found myself involved as Mr. Tudor's partner. — Expiration of his Privilege. — Obstacles to its renewal. — His anxiety and efforts^ to obtain it. — New lot for an ice-house. — Necessity for obtaining one.^ Mr. Tudor's "instructions" on the subject. — His insulting deportment and baseless charges. — Management of the ice house. — Mr. Tudor's insulting, groundless, and ever-renewing charges of neglect of duty. — His pretension to reduce my com pensation. — Mission of his brother Henry. — / retire from the post of ice-house keeper in April, 1830. — Extraordinary game played by Mr. Tudor on this subject. — The charge of the ice house temporarily resumed by me in August. — More of Mr. Tudor's self-contradictions. — New Privilege obtained, August, 1830. — More, again, of Mr. Tudor. — My position at the close of 1830. — I depart for Boston. Difficulties. Having thus allowed myself to be induced to become Mr. Tudor's partner, and, by linking my own interests permanenfly with his, to surrender the freedom I had previously enjoyed, — to sever my connection with him at any moment it might become distasteful to me, — it was not long before I was made sensible of the nature of my new position. Instead of the secure possession and enjoyment of the property and Privi lege of which I had bought a share, I found that there was no Privilege, and that the whole " concern," — house, business, and all, — stood upon a basis so very precarious, that there was no telling at what moment it might come tumbling about my ears. Instead of having upon my hands merely the care of the prop erty and management of the business of receiving and vending ice, in peace and quiet, I found that this constituted but a most insignificant part of the task to which I had unconsciously bound myself; and to which I was compelled for many years to remain a slave, as the only alternative to the loss of what I had paid for. In place of the employer who had been so well satisfied with my management as to put upon the value of my services the high estimate indicated by his anxiety to secure them, and by the price at which he wished to do so, I found myself bound now by the iron bands of necessity to a partner whom it was impossible to please, and upon whom the only effect pro duced by the proof of the utter groundlessness of one string of insulting animadversions, seemed to be to charge him for another volley of contumely ; one, whose nature forbade that he should make a manly acknowledgement of error and injustice, or even allow the consciousness of it to check him in the future indul- 31 gence of those propensities by which he had been betrayed into them. Expiration of Mr. Tudor's Privilege, &c. Soon after the date of the arrangement concluded with Mr. Tudor, in the manner and terms above described, I left Boston for Havana, where I arrived on the 10th of March, 1824, in the ship Colum bus, loaded with a cargo of ice, to which had been added some fresh fruit and other minor articles. Upon this vessel, — as also upon the ship Bramin, which fol lowed soon after, wilh a similar cargo, — tonnage duties were demanded at the Custom House, contrary to what had been the practice in regard to vessels bringing ice, when I had been in charge of the business as Mr. Tudor's agent. It was at first supposed that this was owing to the fact that the cargoes of these vessels did not consist solely of ice, the article in favor of which the exemption had been granted ; and, acting upon this suppo sition, Mr. Tudor's mercantfle correspondents at Havana took steps to obtain the remission of the duties. These, however, served only to elicit the fact stated in the following extract from my letter to Mr. Tudor, of the 21st May, 1824. " The tonnage duty is not exacted on account of other mer chandise being brought in those vessels ; but, as the Collector says, on account of the contract having expired." Such was the position wherein I unexpectedly found myself in this particular ! " The contract having expired," a renewal of the Privilege had to be obtained, or these consequences would follow : first, our business would be left exposed to the compe tition of whomsoever might see fit to engage in the same ; secondly, the exclusive Privilege might be obtained by another party, in which event our business would be put a stop to alto gether, and the value of my fifth, together with the four fifths of Mr. Tudor, be reduced to nothing ; and thirdly, the precarious title by which we held the ground on which the ice-house stood, (which, it will be recollected, had been erected on the express condition that it should be removed whensoever Mr. Tudor should be called upon to remove it,) was rendered infinitely more pre carious, because the only reason which had induced the author ities to grant this lease-at-will, — to wit, the contract with them, — no longer existed. To procure the renewal of the Privilege, necessarily became, therefore, the primary object with us.(e) But it was no easy mat- (e) The following extract from a long letter of Mr. Tudor's, under date April 28, 1824, shows how very "coolly and dispassionately" the subject was at first treated by him. Long before the year was out, however, his tone underwent a change; — by no means, — as the reader will come to perceive, — a rare phenome- 32 ter; for several competitors presented themselves, and the com petition soon waxed so warm, that one of our rivals, (a person at this present time yet living in Havana,) went so far as to at tempt to drive me from the field by threats of personal violence. Meeting me one day on the wharf, he referred to what he chose to look upon as my unwarrantable interference with his interests, and said, " Young man, take care you do n't get a knife into you ! " During this contest for the exclusive Privilege, the business was open to all who might choose to engage in it; but, fortu nately for our interests, those who purposed doing so were intent, in the first place, upon obtaining the Privilege, as the means of excluding all competition, and especially ours, which, as we were already established, was felt to be the most to be dreaded. In their efforts to obtain it, they exhausted themselves, and lost time ; and the consequence was, that we were left in as exclu sive possession of the business as if the old Privilege had slill been in force. non. [It is to be observed too, that the date at which he thus speaks of the " ex-Piivilege,^' as he terms it, is some days prior to that of my letter informing him of my discovery of the existence of this valuable entity. It follows, therefore, that he must have received his intelligence on the subject, — if so be he needed any, — from some one else. At any rate, so far as he was concerned, I could claim no patent for the discovery, on the strength of my letter of May 21.] " As respects the ex-Privilege, no one can obtain it without notice being given to me ; and as the time of the revolution has passed without any one stirring, it is probably best not to move in it. Silence is valuable. Not to make the matter a subject of question is best. There remains a general impression that the ice business is a subject of exclusive Privilege ; and this impression, now that the government is despotic, is strengthened. In my opinion, it is the part of discretion not to say a word about privilege. " But the best privilege, and the greatest security, will be an exact attention that no whispering shall go abroad that the ice business is very good. That this may not be the case, never forget the verbal instructions which I have given you to be foUowed. Do not buy your bills aZi of one House. Nor send me always bills ; when bills are at par, dollars will be also ; " &c. &c. — " If one man says the ice is profit able, another adds to the story; and so it grows to a magnitude entirely beyond the reasonable and moderate thing it is." This, it must be confessed, was all very "cool and dispassionate," and very " snug and comfortable." A more felicitous mode of stowing away the " any Pjivilege" could not well have been devised. And yet, but two months pass over, and then, under date July 2, 1824 he dis courses in the following strain : ' " I shall consult with Mr. of the expediency of attempting a renewal of the Privilege, which will be more important if the street sales are undertaken and the jars get into vogue. When once it becomes a general custom to use cold drinks, the sales may be expected greatly to increase. This kind of use for the ice i« evidently growing. — The use of ice for creams, is limited to a certain amount, but for cold drinks every thing may be expected, and protection by the jirivilege becomes more necessary.'^ In one breath the Privilege is a mere matter of moonshine. In the next it is necessary, m the exact proportion as the business may be worth pursuing! ' And thus will It be found to be with ih. Tudor, throughout, in all things : questions of expediency, and questions of justice and obligation. 33 Thus did accident operate in my favor, and give me a reality, in place of the nonentity, for a share in which my money had been paid to Mr. Tudor. Meanwhile, however, I was not al lowed to enjoy this good fortune in idleness. It had to be worked and contested for;(/) and, whUst the toil and trouble of the contest fell almost entirely upon me, — Mr. Tudor seeing fit to turn a deaf ear to my repeated and urgent representation of the necessity of his presence at Havana, — any advantage which might attend my exertions would belong almost exclusively to my partner. Instead of the peaceful enjoyment of what his bill of sale and contract professed to secure to me, in return for my money and the services therein specified, the thing for which my money had been paid turned out lo be the right to render to Mr. Tudor, in addition to the services which I had engaged to perform, that of fighting a batfle for a renewal of the Privilege, among other things; and gaining for him the advan tage of owning four fifths of it, as the only way of securing my own share. This intermission of the Privilege lasted about seven years ; (from the beginning of 1824 to late in 1830,) during the greater part of which the subject was one of intense anxiety on the part of Mr. Tudor no less than of myself. A few extracts from his letters in 1824, will suffice to put this fact, and others connected with it, in a strong light. His lawyer at Havana was the dis tinguished Don Nicolas Escovedo, to whom on the 25th Octo ber of that year, he wrote a letter, of which he transmitted me a copy, that reads in part as follows : " I am desirous of making a new contract for ice. I under stand some other persons have made proposals to the Cabildo, full of great promises. But how can they fulfil them without ice-houses either in Havana or this country. I shall by this opportunity send out to Mr. Damon sufficient evidence of the immense expenses I have gone to for the purpose of furnishing ice from this country in summer. " I hope with your aid to make a new contract for supplying Havana, with an entire relinquishment of the tonnage duty, which is of the greatest importance. I have to request of you to bring this business to as speedy a determination as may be, before the commencement of wtinter, and before any of the new pretenders can do anything in the way of interference." To myself, he writes on the 30th of October, enclosing ex- "^, One of his letters in 1824, winds up with the following valorous exhortation : du have a battle to fight, and I expect you will do it like a brave man." 5 34 tracts ig) of two letters received by him from friends in New York and Phfladelphia ; through whose aid, in part, he promised himself success ; and he says : " I think when and shafl get out to Havana, they will add such an increase of strength that we can get on," &c. " I have no doubt of getting wefl through this business, and that these new Gobertos wifl do us good rather than harm. We shall be strengthened ; but what is wanted is despatch, so that the interferers may not be able to get out any ice." The Gobertos to whom he alludes, and in regard to whom he is anxious for despatch, are the competitors for the Privflege, who had expressed the intention to import ice the coming winter. He cafled them by this name because it was that of a compe titor whom Mr. Tudor had had at a former period. One thing in these extracts is rendered particularly worthy of remark by Mr. Tudor's subsequent course in denying that I had acquired any permanent share in the concern. He speaks al ways of us, as the party opposed to these new Gobertos; they "will do us good." " We shall be strengthened." The same feature is still more prominent and striking in his letter of November 6, 1824: " You will, before you get this, I hope, have received the many letters and documents," &c. " We have a great stake ; you have your fortune depending wpon a good issue in this contest; and I have done afl that I can, and I hope to inspire you with courage to assert my cause. For it will and shall prevail. The Count and Mr. are coming to your aid, and to defend me against these trashy, washy people." " When we get over this difficulty, we will build a great ice house, that shall by its permanent appearance appal such poor creatures as are now alarming you." Here again, as is seen, it is " we," afl through. At that time, I was told, "you have your fortune depending ; " and "we will bufld a great ice-house, that shall, by its permanent appearance," &c. ; which words, to make them the more emphaticafly signifi cant, were underscored by Mr. Tudor himself. The result, however, of all these efforts of Mr. Tudor, and of the commanding influence which he conceived himself to have brought to bear upon the subject, was, that nothing was accom plished. It was not until about six years after, — and then through (g) One of these says, " Count thinks he can get the exclusive Privilege renewed." The other says, " I will do all I can to promote your object of obtaining the exclusive Privilege of furnishing Havana with ice : for indeed t think no one is entitled to it but yourself; having persevered so many years, and expended so much time, trouble and mon ;y for that object. You may depend upon my exertions- and if 18 still in health, I shall have hopes of success." 35 my exertions chiefly, — that the renewal of the Privflege was ob tained ; and during this whole interval, our interests stood upon that precarious footing, which, notwithstanding Mr. Tudor's re proaches concerning the " alarm " that he attributed to me, con tinued to be with him a source of intense and undissembled anxiety. (A) New Lot for an Ice-House, &c. From this source of diffi culty, I wfll pass to another, closely connected with it, and often blended with it in Mr. Tudor's letters and in the insulting re proaches with which they came fraught. The state of the building used as an ice-house soon proved to be worse than I had formed any idea of. (i) Notwithstanding (A) About the middle of November, 1824, the Cabildo, or Ayumtamiinto, (City Council) passed a vote in favor of giving the preference to the former contractor (Mr. Tudor) over the other applicants. Further action on the subject was post poned until their next meeting; when they were to take under consideration the limitation of price, the term for which the Privilege should be granted, and other details. Owing, however, to a variety of causes, the matter stood still for about eight months. In July, 1825, a committee of the Cabildo, to whom the matter had been referred, reported the draught of a contract, fixing the price at one half reAl per lb., exempting vessels bringing ice from tonnage duties, and giving the exclusive Privi lege for the term of six years from the 1st of Jan. 1825. This draught was approved; and the contract, in this shape, was agreed to by the Cabildo and by Mr. Tudor's attorney. But, owing to obstacles interposed by the Reil Haciinda, whose concurrence was requisite, and the head of which de partment notified to the Cabildo not to proceed in the matter until it should have decided whether it were not expedient, instead of granting a new Privilege, to open the ice trade and to subject it to an import duty, the subject progressed no further : the Privilege — to repeat the expression made use of by one who was exerting himself in our behalf — was " hung up." One advantage, however, resulted from what had been done ; whilst the subject remained in this state of suspension, the existing establishment was looked upon with great indulgence, and was permitted always for the moment to enjoy that to which the contract (although demurred to by some of the authorities) would have entitled us, had it been completed. By the Cabildo — on which body we depended for being allowed to continue to occupy by sufferance the lot on which the ice-house stood — it was, to use the e.xpression of one of the members, considered that it " had about concluded the contract ; " and hence a disposition on its part to show us every favor, notwithstanding any opposi tion to the granting of the Privilege, from those whose concurrent action was requisite. By it, and its officers, "the contract " (as the above mentioned draught was termed) was, in after years, considered as fixing the time during which, if prac ticable, we should be deemed to have a claim to the indulgence. For extracts, showing, for the first two years, the course of this current in the " sea of troubles," which it pleased Mr. Tudor to leave me to buffet with, see Ap pendix, (c) ) Not only does he draw " at five days sight," but he wishes that I pay the bills " on presentation." Why such desperate haste? I leave it to the reader to guess, after being informed that Mr. Tudor had just adopted the course of instituting a new suit against me, (and a new attachment on my property,) claiming damages to the amount of one hundred thousand dollars. It is on the very heel of this amica ble proceeding that he despatches his bills, and does " earnestly request you not to have these bills dishonored ; and in the course you adopt in this matter, I shall see whether there is any latent hope, of ever being on^good terms with you again." Query : could Mr. Tudor think it possible that his bills could be accepted and paid, unless this should be done before I got wind of his new step for getting "on good terms?" Any one who can believe it possible that such expectation could be entertained by him, can also believe it /iossi6/e that his reason for drawing at short sight and making this whining appeal (sounding so much like a true note of dis tress) to my good feelings, was something else than the hope of surprising me be fore intelligence of his " war to the knife " movement should reach me. This is one point in this good-faith transaction. And now for another: It will be recollected, that, in my letter of April 1st, 1838, I had given him to understand that the money of his, then " in my trunk," or which might come there, should remain there until he should " have raised the interdict on my property and person ; " in other words, discontinue his Boston suit and attachment. Accordingly, when he despatched Mr. Fenno to Havana, he did not forget to in form me that Mr. Fenno was authorized " to give you a release of the suit now pending against you here, in case a settlement of accounts is made." 215 What reception I gave to these bifls will be seen from the first of the following extracts from letters to my friend in Boston : Jan. 7. " The above is a copy of a letter from Mr. Tudor, advising that he had drawn three bifls on rae to the amount of $3187 .2rs. These bflls I have protested, stating in the protest that it is for just motives that support me in it. These just mo tives are, first, that Tudor has no such sum due him from here ; and secondly, that your letter informs me that Tudor has re-com menced a suit against me for $100,000, and laid another attach ment on my property in Summer street Now, I think I am perfecfly justified in protesting these bills, and in refusing to make any more remittances, of that which I may have on hand, or may come into my hands hereafter, so long as he continues to molest me with attachments." " He could have no idea that I should be made acquainted with the new attachment until I had accepted his bills ; and your notice of it came just in time to save me. " I expect, in a few days, to have letters giving an account of your negotiation wilh Mr. Tudor for the purchase of his part of the house. As he is going on, I think you will see the impro priety of coming lo any arrangement [w) with him, for a contin uance of our co-partnership. It is impossible for him to come to any just arrangement." Jan. 12. " I was aware of Fenno's being a partner with Tu dor. Fenno told it me himself, and said he should have the transacting of all the business hereafter, and there would be no doubt of our agreeing harmoniously, and much more of such kind of soft soap. But when he found I would not petition the Cabildo to annul my Contract, so that he might apply for it, he changed his tone, and said that Mr. Tudor -vi'ould commence a suit against me, and it would go before an honest and impartial jury in Boston, and it would be likely they would call on him for declarations, and much more of a similar kind. These I Well, the settlement was made; and in consequence thereof, Mr. Fenno pocket ed for Mr. Tudor, (his own commission included, whatever this may have been,) nearly twenty-one thousand dollars. He simultaneously executed a notarial deed, (without which, the money must still have remained in my trunk,) giving me the "release of the suit now pending against you here." Of course, Mr. Tudor's "good faith," — to say nothing of the force of law, — would not allow him to do otherwise than proceed at Boston to withdraw his suit and raise the attachment. This was most scrupulously done by him. In the very same breath, without so much as taking a turn in the Clerk's office, so far as I am informed, he instituted a new suit, for five times the amount of the former, and attached my property again I , . , . So much, then, did I gain by letting his 820,824 pass from my trunk into his pocket! If this be " good faith " in law, then must law indeed be, — as Mr. Tudor had long ago informed me it was, — " a very different thing from equity." (w) See the close of my letter of Dec. 5. 216 took as menaces, and let them pass by without any reply. He went into a long history, to tell me that Mr. Tudor had once be fore been usurped of his Privilege, but he drove the usurper away and recovered his rights. To this I made no reply neither; but I could have told Mr. Fenno something about thai usurpation, as he cafled it, which he knew nothing of. I befleve I know as much about that affair as Mr. Tudor himself; and if I was wflh you two or three hours, I could give you an idea of it Here, I wifl only say that Mr. Tudor had no more rights then, than he has now." The mode in which ray offer to purchase his part of the ice house at cost, (though the building was now between seven and eight years old,) was treated by Mr. Tudor, wifl be seen from the foUowing extracts from a letter of Col. Hobbs. His rejection of my offer was a very fortunate circumstance for me ; for, — as wifl be seen presently, — had he accepted it, the amount paid him would have been a clear loss to me. Jan. 4, 1839. " The foflowing is a copy of my note to him to day: " ' Frederic Tudor, Esq. : I am constrained to say, unless my proposition be accepted before three o'clock to-day, I shall con sider it as withdrawn, and notify my principal of that fact' " Mr. Tudor says that he is wifling to guarantee {x) to you the management of the business, as originally understood under the contract, waiving all claim to interfere with your ten per cent." — " Mr. Tudor denies ever having had an intention of taking away from you your one fifth. Mr. Fenno showed me some lelters which he calculates to make use of in this case, to prove that you secretly applied to the Government of Havana for a contract in your own name, after you were re-instated under the decision at Principe. It may be necessary to rebut this with evidence. " It is now past three o'clock, and I have no communication from Mr. Tudor. Therefore the business of purchasing the ice house is at an end." I will now give some extracts from my letters in reply to this, and to others which followed : Feb. 9. " I have done no wrong to Mr. Tudor, but he has done an in-eparable one to me ; and now he tells you he is ' wil ling to guarantee to (me) the management of the business, as originally under.stood under the contract, waiving all claim to in terfere with (my) ten per cent. I know the way he understands the ' constitution,' is, to ' instruct' me out, whenever he pleases." (x) He -was iiow wilUng to " guarantee " that which he had been constantly in tent upon finding some pretext for depriving me of, ever since the right to it had been acquired by my acceptance of his reiterated proposal ! 217 Mr. Tudor's denial that he ever had any intention of taking away my fifth, amounts to nolhing ; for his acts to take it away speak louder than words in denying his intentions so to do. Where is Tudor's letter to you in March, 1835, saying that I had forfeited my interest in the ice-house, &c. &c. ? where are the numerous declarations of his agent Davenport, to the same effect ? where is Tudor's letter to me, of Dec. 10, 1830 ? Are these not actions which speak as loud and as clear as his present professions ? " When Mr. Fenno shows you any more ' letters,' which he calculates to use in this case [at Boston] to prove that I secretly applied to ihe Government for the contract in my own name, tell him that it is false, a right down falsehood. To prove the falsity of his ' letters,' I send you newspapers, in which my proposal was published, the Government calling upon any one to better the proposition. You will perceive Fenno's tone to me, by the in closed copy of his letter of 1st January. He has denied ihe part which I wrote to Mr. Tudor the 1st of Dec, and has inserted what he says is a fact, but I say his insertion is false. I think you ought to give but litfle faith to anything Fenno or Tudor says ; if they do not give absolute falsehoods, they garble the truth so that one can hardly tell whether it be truth or falsehood. I believe Fenno's object in writing to me was to get me to put something on paper, that they would, if convenient, take advantage of; I therefore make him no reply. I think I can see in Fenno's letter, that there is something out of the way between him and Mr. Tudor ; and that the letter is intended to draw out something from me, on which he may be able to build himself up again. " Mr. Tudor's intentions not to take away my fifih, and Mr. Fenno's ' cannot forbear to express the hope,' &c., appear to me to chime in, as if they had become fearful ihat ' strength ' might be wanting to accomplish their desires, and they had therefore come to persuasions and protestations of intentions. This does not look like a valorous man going to batfle, having a good cause to defend. " By your letter of the 2d Jan., I see the ground Mr. Tudor was going to take, so as to consume time. He was wrong in saying I would not ])roceed to business untfl Mr. Fenno had procured papers, and was put to very useless expense. («/) We (v) " I called on Mr. Tudor and informed him of the proposal I was empowered to make He said he would not treat unless it was in a very formal way ; that you had put Mr. Fenno to very useless expense to procure papers before you would proceed to business with him. It was now necessary that he should adopt the same course towards you, and he should require of me a certified copy of my Power, and a proposition in writing." .„,... .v „ •„ This is valuable as a specimen of the minor fabncations, — the mall coin, — ^8 218 proceeded to business immediately on his arrival; and nothing was said about expense or papers until the accounts were made and ready for signing, and then, it was only to legalize his Power, so that he could give a receipt and bind his principal lo stop the law suit then pending in Boston. But notwithstanding those precautions, it seems they have evaded, at least for the present, afl of them." Feb. 12. [To another friend.] " Whatever Tudor and Fenno may say respecting their intentions about not taking my property away from rae, they will do it if they can ; and any assertions of theirs to the contrary, ought not to be credited for one moment My friends here are of opinion that I have done even too much towards a comproraise with Mr. Tudor, and that the better way now, is to break with him entirely, and lake no notice or care of him. This was the opinion of Mr. yesterday." [The gentleman here named was one of those to whom Mr. Tudor was most indebted at Havana, and on the efficacy of whose continued exertions in his favor he had most relied, during the long crisis which immediately followed his sale to me of a share in his "any Privilege."] April 27. " Respecting the evidence you wrote me about, I am advised by ray lawyer to take out a copy of all the memori als which I addressed to the Government, together with the acts of the Government upon them; which I think ought to be enough to satisfy any one that what I have done has been done according to the laws and customs of the country. But if there should be further proof wanted, I shall send you the names of all the Regidores (answering to your Aldermen,) who were im mediately concerned in the making of the contract, together with flie Procurador Sindico General, whose duty it is to look after the interests of the inhabitants and defend their rights. The.se were immediately concerned, (like a committee of your Alder men,) and their report made to the Board, lo be adopted, or mod ified or rejected. So, if there had been any 'fraud,' it would have been with all of them, more than a dozen in number." > which Tudor has deemed it not unworthy his lofty character to employ himself in stamping and giving circulation to, respecting the "poor miserable carpenter." The truth of the matter was, that, to spare him " expense," — certainly not for my own gratification, — Mr. Fenno, from the moment of his arrival at Havana, had been invited to be, and had been my guest. The only expense to which he was put, was that of having his Power translated and notarially recorded; and Mr. Tudor was perfectly aware that without this formality, the Power was as worth less, and all acts under it as invalid, as if it had been a piece of old newspaper. This was the case at Havana. As for his little "Ut for tat," at Boston, — where such formalities are but Uttle known ; and where, if it had been otherwise, they were not demanded by the nature of the case at that point, — it harmonized well with the "grand climacteric " to which this "child of a larger growth," was ap proaching. 219 May 24. " I now send," &c. &c. " The accusation of Tudor, that 1 fraudulently obtained the contract to supply this place with ice, is as false as the other pretexts he has made use of before now, to despoil me of my rights, and resist the fulfilment of the contract we had entered into, forcing me into law suits which he has lost by the decision of the Courts here. " It was impossible that I should have obtained this contract fraudulently ; as, according to the laws, the City Council cannot make contracts unless the proposals are made public by announc ing them in the papers of the city, as you wifl recollect was done in those of the 28th, 29lh, and oOth of January, last year, which I remitted. In those papers I remitted you, all persons were invited or cafled upon who might wish to belter the propo sals which I had made ; and although time was allowed, that they might do it, no one presented himself ; on which account the contract was ratified with me. You will be more fully in structed by the exact and legal copy of the process remitted you, through which the contract was made, and is more than suffi cient proof of the legality of my contract and which you can make use of in your Courts to show them, I think, that they have nothing to do in this aff'air. " Mr. Tudor has not proceeded with me, with the same frank ness and faithfulness I have wilh him. You will see in lhis pro cess I told the City Council, that if Tudor wished, and agreed with me on the conditions of the contract, we would be partners. I feel sure he would not have done this with me. I not only did this, but immediately gave him notice, as you will see by the copies of the letters I have sent you, and invited him to enter in to the proposals. But that which he did was, lo remit me a Power, that I should accept the new contract for him; and ac companying it by a letter in which he denied me the right of charging the ten per cent, or the fifth interest, which, by a writ ten agreement, has belonged to me ever since the first contract." Nevertheless, Mr. Tudor found means to keep his Boston suit .for $100,000 pending over me ; and to deprive me, so long as it should be in his power to keep matters in this stale, of all con trol over my property there ; a sale of a portion of which had, in consequence of his attachment, been interfered with, in such a way as to expose me to serious loss and trouble from the bona, fide purchasers, who had come upon me with a claim for dam ages. In this state of things I was determined, — as I had informed my correspondent, — that no property of his in my hands should pass out of them until he should have ceased so to harass me. In one respect, however, — as has already been intimated, — I 220 have reason to be thankful for the course he saw fit to pursue ; for, had he desisted from his persecutions and accepted my offer of $13,600, it would have been to me a clear loss of so much money. The reason wfll appear from the following order of the Captain General : " Captain Generalcy of the Ever Faithful Island of Cuba, Havana, Oct 21, 1839. " The chief Alguazil of this Captain Generalcy, wifl notify to the ice-contractor, that he proceed to demolish ihe ice-house, sit uated between the houses adjacent to the Cathedral Church, up on the wall in the vicinity of the Boquete ; this being in confor mity with the deed executed on the 5lh August, 1831 — Which order issues at the request of the Commandant of Engineers, who is about to proceed immediately to the repairing of said wall. Espeleta." This was followed by another, under date October 25 : " In view of the representation made by Mr. John W. Damon, expressing his compliance with the order requiring him lo pro ceed immediately to the demolition of the ice-house, and praying time lo build another deposite, I have judged fit to grant him until the 1st of April of next year; by which day, the house must have been demolished and Ihe ground cleared away. Which will be notified to him by the chief Alq'uazil of this Captain Generalcy. Espeleta." This order left me, of course, no option but to build immedi ately on the lot mentioned in my letter of Dec. 4, 1838, as having been offered me; and then pulldown the building, for Mr. Tudor's share in which I had offered hira nearly $14,000. His mode of treating that offer had therefore saved me from a heavy loss. The intimation has got abroad, — whether originating with Mr. Tudor, he can best say, — that this order of the Captain General was procured by me ! Not to mention other proofs which raight be adduced to show the absurdity of this slander, I will state one fact v.'hich is conclusive upon the subject The. reader is aware [see § 6] how the ice-house stood with reference to the wafl of the city. That wafl, — buifl of hewn stone, and rising from beneath the surface of the water of the Bay, to an average height of some thirty feet or more, — had become much undermined by the action of the waves; and the work of re pairing it, mentioned in the order of the Captain General, con sisted in taking it down andrebuflding it upon a new foundation. The repair was a general one, and had begun at the other ex tremity of the city, nearly a mile from where the ice-house stood. Such is the nature of the Utfle job, — involving the immense 221 labor and expense of coffer-dams, &c. &c., in a turbulent sea, — which, according to the stupid slander referred to, was got up through my intrigues with the authorities ! And all for the pur pose of benefiting myself at the expense of Mr. Frederic Tudor!! A fair specimen this, of the accuracy of the information ob tained from some sources in regard to Havana affairs. The demolition of the building, of course took place; and thus terminated that community of property between Mr. Tudor and myself which survived, for sometime, the expiration of the partnership, (or partnership no-partnership,) wilh the history of which, from the raoraent of its conception down to that of its death, the reader is now sufficiently acquainted. It only remains to add, that besides his Boston suit for $100,000 damages, Mr. Tudor saw fit to institute the one at Havana, mentioned at the beginning of this exposition, wherein he claimed to be the own er of four fifths of the contract entered into by me with the Cabildo ! The mode in which, and the principles upon which, this suit has been prosecuted by him, may perhaps form the subject of a supplemental narrative, wherein other distinguished personages besides Mr. Tudor, will be seen to figure. APPENDIX. APPENDIX. (A.) Contract between J. W. Damon and the Authorities of the City of Havana. ( Translation.) In the ever most faithful City of Havana, on the 23d of August, 1838, before me, the undersigned Notary and witnesses, appeared Mr. John W. Damon, a resident and trader in this place, known to me, and said that he has agreed with the most excellent Ayuntamiento, with the approbation of the raost excel lent Lord its President, the Governor and Captain General, to close and execute the Contract for supplying the City with ice, (the existing Contract being to expire on the 31st Dec. of the present year,) the preflrainaries to said Contract having been proceeded in according to law, by the publication of the propo sals, and the due participation to His Exceflency the Intendant and Superintendent General of the Royal Hacienda, which Contract is in the terms following, to wit: First. The said Damon binds himself to supply the market of this place with ice, for the term of ten years, to be counted from the 1st day of January, 1839, and to end on the 1st day of January, 1849. Second. The ice shafl be sold to the public at one half real the pound ; and no higher price shall be demanded under any pretext whatever, during the term of his contract Third. As a security for a constant supply of ice, he binds himself, in case of a failure of supply, through any default of his or of his agents, for twenty consecutive days, to pay the penal ty of $4000, which payment shall be made to the most excellent Ayuntamiento. And for the punctual fulfilment of this condi tion adequate security shall be given. 29 226 Fourth. In conformity with what has been agreed upon, said Damon shall have and enjoy the exclusive privilege of supplying ice, and no other person shall be allowed to introduce or to vend said article during the period for which this contract is made. [Here follow other numerous detafls; after which the instru ment closes as follows.] And being present Don Jose Patricio de Sizgado and Don Carlos Jose Pedroso, Regidores commissioned by the most ex cellent Ayuntamiento, and Don Romualdo de Zamora, Syndic Procurador General, known to me, ihey accepted, in behalf of those whom they represent, this Deed and the Mortgage therein embodied. In testimony whereof the said Regidores and Syn dic, together wilh the Contractor, hereunto set their names, &c. &c. (B.) [ Copy.] Memorandum of Proposal to Mr. J. W. Damon. I wfll sell one tenth of the ice-house and rights appurtenant, for three thousand dollars, payable in one, two, and three years,, with interest. The sale to be made the 1st of Jan. next, say when you are in Boston. Or I will contract to sell you the same share for one dollar at the end of the term proposed below;. together with another tenth for three thousand dollars, if you are willing to return here, conducting the business as at present, and remain here two years and a half, that is to say, three summers. You will then have one fifth of the concern for three thousand doflars paid. It is understood, when a parlner in the concern, you are to undertake to look after the business, and when it shall be neces sary, lo come here : although you would perhaps do this for your own interest, it is necessary to me that it should be agreed for. If the business should be equal in gross to 16, 17, or $18,000 per annum, you wifl make a profit by buying, next January, for $3,000, ralher than have it sold to you for one dollar, in the 3d year. After you have accomplished the time which I am desirous you should remain here, your are, in your occasional visits, to be allowed, say two dollars a day during your absence from Bos ton on the business. At the termination of the present year you will be better able to know what the business wifl, in all probabflity, amount to> 227 and I make the proposition to you absolutely, and give you the offer ol accepting it until the first of January next Observations. It is my wish to keep you here in good pay for some time, and not asking you to run risks, but making you the one dollar offer, and the further right of purchase at the termination of the three summers for three thousand dollars, to complete your fifih mterest, although it may be worth more. If it is worth less, you are not bound to take it By a steady conduct of the business, wflh a uniformity of «^PP'y) you wifl know what the business ought to be, and" the agent who may be subsequently appointed be checked by the records of five years which wfll be known to be correct The Increase of the Business. I have not changed my opinion respecting street sales ; and I should, if there had not been so much to do, have urged it more particularly. I hope you wifl make another and determined effort to get it going on when there is some leisure. I think the sales may be doubled by this thing. I have put the net income at $10,000, allowing $6,000 for expenses, but if one cargo can be made to answer, they wifl be reduced very nearly one half. I do not think any increase is to be expected, unless it is to be effected by street sales ; with a warm season it wifl be better, and with a cold one worse, than last year. Concluding Observations. I cannot be expected to sefl at a rate less than what the prop erty itself will produce in three years. It is no object to me lo sell, unless all the personal 'attention which may be necessary here, shall be given by the purchaser, with an allowance, as above stated, for his expenses. To be relieved from personal attention to the business, partic ularly here, is very desirable to me. If this country should remain as it is, and nolhing occurs to interrupt the business, you have a pretty fair prospect of owning a property 3^ years from now, which will net you $2,000 or more annually, and in the progress to this, if disastrous events interfere, you will have made and secured a very good pay for your trouble, let the busi ness be interrupted at what period it may. The present house is guaranteed to stand against being re moved by the authorities of the place, for three years, and the 228 new house to be buifl at the expense of my four fifths. Your fifih, instead of paying, is to be made up by your attention to the erection ; and the concern charged with the two dollars, un less you are here selling ice, as at present Should you return home in Dec. with a view of coming out here again, I ara willing to be charged two doubloons, if you come by way of Baltimore or Philadelphia, rather than by the way of Cape Cod in that stormy season. Frederick Tudor. Havana, May 5th, 1823. Sometime after the 1st of January, 1824, 1 having in my hand this paper, distincfly offered to J. W. Damon to accept the prop osition contained in it, and which he distinctly refused: which refusal ended it F. T. (B. B.) Bill of Sale from Tudor to Damon. In consideration of Six thousand dollars, paid to me by John W. Damon, by his note of hand and money, I do hereby sefl to hira one-fifth part of the ice house and its appurtenances, to gether with the like proportion in any Privilege from the gov ernment of Havana, where the ice house is situated, this interest commencing on the first of January, eighteen hundred and twenty-four. This sale does not extend to heirs or assigns ; but in case of any misfortune whereby said J. W. Damon cannot ren der any aid to the concern, then any money paid by him, for the said fifth, may be refunded to his representative by F. Tudor, the grantor, or his heirs; but not in case J. W. Damon should remain in good health. The right of instructing the mode in which the business shall be conducted is reserved entire in said F. Tudor. Said fifth is not to be charged any expense for cost and freight of ice now in Havana, but bears its proportion of the commis sions of $300, to be paid Mr. George Knight. Refrigerators, jars, &c. to be sold on account solely of F. Tudor. Mr. Damon goes to Havana, and is to charge the concern ten per centum for his services and remittances and other necessary care of the business ; the same as last year. Frederic Tudor, Boston, January 29, 1824. J. W. Damon. 229 (C.) Reneival of the Privilege. — Extracts from my Letters to Mr. Tudor. ( They convey a faint idea of the ' course which this business took, and of the trouble and anxiety it occasioned me.) Aug. 14, 1824. " I think it would be well for you to come out here as soon as you can make it convenient. I have already informed you that the original charier could not be found ; if it had been, there would have been a memorial presented long ago, which might have prevented the presenj: difficulty. If you have it in your possession it would be well to bring il." Sept. 2. " Mr. A. says he does not know whether there is some intrigue or not ; nevertheless, Mr. D. has been asked for his influence in favor of somebody, and gave an unfavorable answer, says Mr. A. I understand Mr. F. is to be here next month. I think it of the utmost importance that you should be here as soon you can make it convenient." Sept. 12. " I also learned of Mr. A. that a Spaniard (he said he did not know who) had made a proposition to the Cabildo, to supply the Havana with ice, at a real a pound, and that Mr. D. had made the same proposal, (if I understood him right,) if they would renew the charter." Sept. 16. " I this day cafled again and presented him with your letter, and requested his influence wilh the inhabitants of this city, in your favor, respecting the ice Privilege. He said he was willing to do all he could for your interest, that there was no doubt the Cabildo would be willing to give you the pre ference, and that Mr. D. would be able to accomplish the busi ness. I'liope to see you here in all next month ; for I think it of the utmost importance for the ice business, that you shoidd be here." Sept. 21. " Yesterday, by accident, I met with J A , (he is the man who said he was trying for a Privilege, about 18 months past,) who told me he had a memorial before the Cabil do for a Privilege. It is certainly for your interest that you should come here as soon as you can make it convenient." Oct. 2. " I have heard nothing from the Cabildo, or your competitor, since my last." Oct. 4. " If this finds you in Boston, it is of the utmost im portance that you should come herein all possible speed; for I have just seen Mr. D. who told me that the men who have pe titioned the Cabildo, for the Privflege of bringing ice into the Havana, have offered to supply the city at one real the pound, 230 and have a number of places about the city where the public may be supplied. They do not ask for any land, but wfll erect their house at a convenient place on their own land, and then separate it to the places for the convenience of the public. " It is now one o'clock, and the vessel is to sail this afternoon ; do not neglect to come as soon as possible." Oct. 12. " I wish that the causes of my fears were not of a greater magnitude than you conceive them to be ; and if I have disclosed a cowardly heart, you wifl impute it to my simplicity or ignorance."Oct. 16. " I this morning called on the Doctor, to see if there was anything done.in the Cabildo respecting the ice business, who told me there was not ; there were six or eight men appoint ed to consult and report on it, and it was likely in five or six days he should be able to give something certain. " M. told Mr. S. that there were some Spaniards determined to take the ice business from you ; th-at it was contrary to the laws of the country for a non-resident to carry on any business in it, &c., and there was no doubt they would carry their point." Oct. 18. " I have heard nothing of A. and his confederates, since my last" Oct. 26. "Yesterday I called on the Doctor, to know if any thing had been done in the Cabildo respecting the Privilege. The Doctor said everything was perfecfly secure ; for the Cabil do had given you the preference instead of A., yet there were some negocialions to be made with the , which were to be made or commenced that evening." Nov. 3. " I was much disappointed when I found there were no letters from you ; but I consoled myself with the idea, that the reason you did not write, was, that you were about to embark for this place." Nov. 8. " Saturday I called for Mr. E.'s information about the changing of the market; he said he did not think it would be done soon, but when it was set in motion he would give us notice, and recommended me lo D. for particular information, as he was in the Cabildo the day before. " When I saw Mr. D. he said, the affair of the privilege is not yet concluded, and it is uncertain how it will turn ; therefore it is best to patch up the house and say but litfle until the Privi lege affair is settled." Nov. 14. "I have not seen Messrs. E. or D. since my last; but, by accident, I met with Mr. A., who said Mr. D. had a deal of trouble about the ice privflege, that he had been accused of being the contractor, &c. 231 " It is quite current about the city, that there is an opposition ; and to-day I was told, by an ice-cream-maker, that he had been told by one of the regidores, that, on the first of January, ice was to be sold at a lower rale. One offered it at $3 the arobe, and the other at 20 reals the arobe." Nov. 19. " Mr. D. said the Privilege was now clear ; that at the last silling of the Cabildo, it passed a vote that the prefer ence should be given to you, and on the next (that is to-day) it was to act on the length of time, price of ice, &c." Nov. 21. " You have been told that the Doctor said he could do nolhing, for want of the original charter. You have also been asked some questions respecting the original charier, or a copy of the same, but never have mentioned it in any of your letters ; these are unpleasant things." Nov. 26. " I then asked him how far he had progressed with the ice Privilege. He said it was clear, but not yet concluded. It was the same as I wrote you on the 19th and 21st inst" " You exhort me to boldness, a suitable degree of which may be called virtue ; but I hope you -will never be able to charge me with temerity." Nov. 27. " Mr. D. says, he does not think we shall be able to get a dispensation of tonnage duty, only on those vessels loaded entirely with ice." " Mr. D. says, it is a matter of doubt whether we recover the exacted tonnage duty, as they were vessels that arrived after the charter expired, and brought other articles." Dec. 1. " I fear the papers wifl not be brought to a close be fore January." Dec. 9.. " The ice Privilege, in my opinion, is secure, and will be placed on the same footing as before ; vessels bringing nothing but ice will be cleared of tonnage duly, and no others." Dec. 11. " Mr. F. came here this morning and said, he had made inquiries and finds everything in a good way. Mr. F. said, he had made inquiries respecting the tonnage duty, and found that it was impossible for vessels bringing ice and other articles lo be cleared of the tonnage duty." 1825. Jan. 28. " This morning I informed Mr. D. that the supply of ice had failed ; he said that it was well that the con tract was not concluded, for that would oblige us to have ice here all the season." March 3. " Yesterday I called on Doctor , to inquire after the contract ; he said, that nothing had been done for some time, on account of the Commissioners being in the country, but you raight be sure everything was secure." March 9. " There has nothing taken place respecting the tonnage or contract, since my letter of 27th. uito. continued to 3d inst." 232 March 17. " Every time I saw Mr. D. in January, he said, he was looking for information of the old charter, to aid him in drawing up the new contract" March 19. " Mr. D. arrived in town yesterday afternoon. I shall endeavor to see him as soon as convenient" April 1. " I have seen Mr. D. since my last, who says noth ing more is done about the Privilege. Mr. K. says, Mr. D. is examining the papers you sent here." April 7. " There has nothing been done for the Privflege, or about the house, since mine of the 1st inst." April 20. " There has nothing been done about the new Privilege. I saw Mr. K. two days since, and he said Mr. D. was in the country, but he was in hopes to have everything settled before he left this for the U. S. which would be some time in June." April 25. " I am as ignorant of any further progress of the Privilege, than of what you have been informed, as the man in the moon ; not that I have not made inquiries, but that I believe there has been no further disclosure made, however far it may have been discussed by the Commissioners. I would wish, for your own convenience, that you might be saved the fatigue of a voyage here ; but for my own satisfaction, I should be very happy to have you come." April 27. " I have just returned from Doctor , by way of the Custom House. The Doctor tells me the sarae thing as heretofore; that is, that everything is secure; but there is one escritura wanted to finish the business. The reason it has not been done, he says, is, that Mr. D. has been in the country, and now is ill Matanzas." May 11. "I saw Mr. D. to-day, who said nolhing further has been done about the Privilege. They are now examining the Custom House records to ascertain the tonnage duty." June 10. " I was to see Doctor three days since, who told me the sarae as usual, that the Privilege was concedido, but the Commissioners had not completed the contract." June 21. " Mr. D. had some talk wilh the Doctor about former papers, the Intendant, &c. I told Mr. D. that it had been urged upon me very hard [by Mr. Tudor] to have the conti-act finished ; when he made the answer, that it probably might be done in two or three weeks." July 1. " A few days since," [here some details about a doc- unient wanted] "it is possible something may be done about the Privilege soon." July 6. " I saw Mr. D. this morning, when he showed me the paper he had drawn up for the contract. The contract, I 233 think, contains seven articles, which I am not able to repeat, having only looked it over whfle he read it It gives you the exclusive privflege of supplying Havana and its suburbs with ice, at a real per lb. for the term of six years from the 1st of January, 1825." July 20. " I asked Mr. if there had been anything done about the contract; he said no; the Intendant had refused to admit any vessels with ice without paying the tonnage, "and that he was about to levy a duty on ice. He said there was a memo rial before the governor aboul it ; that all the documents were to be collected and sent on to you. What wifl be the result of afl this it is difficult to ascertain." Aug. 24. " Mr. D. said he had had an interview with the In tendant, and that he had promised to desist from the contribu tion on ice, but it was not yet given officially." Sept. 21. " About ten days since, Doctor told me that the affairs or things of the ice house estanandantes ; that is, are going on." Oct. 3. " This morning I presented the your enclosed letter. After reading it, he said he would inform himself of the Sindico, how far the business had progressed, &c. and said he would let me know in two or three days : for which I must call at his house, and in case of his absence his major domo would inform me. The asked rae what D. had to do with it, &c. I told hira that Mr. D. was appointed by the Ca bildo to draw the contract, which had been done ; but not yet accepted by the Cabildo. I told hira the Intendant had pro posed to lay a contribution on the importation of ice ; which, under present circumstances, would be ruinous." Oct. 6. " This morning cafled on the , when he said, he had not been able to do any thing." — " I fear there is not much to be expected from ihat quarter." Oct. 17. " This morning I called on the to know the result of his inquiries at the Sindico's office, when he said, that Mr. D. had not yet returned from the country, perhaps in a few days he might, &c. " It is possible the may do something in our favor, but this second delay strengthens my former doubts." Nov. 15. " I have not been to see the since I wrote vou. I met Mr. D. about the time the Criterion arrived, when he said the contract was hung up, or to that effect." Nov. 30. " I have been to see the since my letter of the 15th inst who said, he had spoken to one of the regidores ; but, for want of information respecting the contract, (this is pretty evident that he has not inquired of the Sindico,) that is, 30 234 how far it had proceeded, and what were the obstacles in the wav, he could do no more; he v,'isht'd," &c. (kc. Dec. 10. " Mr. D. said that the Fiscal had told him that if it could be made evidt-nt that the importation of ice would not bear the imposition of duties, he would consent lo have the con tract passed." 1826. Feb. 21. "Last evenino- I returned from Matanzas, which I have examined all over, and to give you a better idea of the place, or rather to explain my own mor^ clearly, I have sketched out a part of the city and its harbor. The city of IVfa- lanzas stands," &c. &c. I am ralher donbtl'ul whether the first year or two wifl be profitable, but it is likely it may become so after a while. Many people appeared very anxious to have an ice house established there; and Mr. M. said he had no doubt but the authorities would grant everything that had been grant ed in Havana, and anyihing more was very doubtful. 1 am now to see what and how much has been done here, and then make an attempt at Matanzas again; but I would like lo have your o|)inion farther. March 20. " I have had no time to inquire after the con tract, for 1 have been so unwell since the discharge of the Noble that 1 could do hardly anything." Murtdt 25. " The Doctor said the contract remained as it was some time since ; that is, with the Intendancy." And thus did the matter go on, week after week, month after month, and year after year. (D.) Mr. Tudor's first Pretext for Confiscating one half of my stipu- lal.id. Compensation. — ''Impioper Letters." — His Munifi cence illusl rated. — He " endfavors to be particularly mod- era/e," and levies upon my one fifth Share a Ta.c of no more than % 100 per annum. — Service of Kef ping and Remilting his Money thrown upon me, and jierjbrmed gratis. — Loss of a Rpmil/anre of $400 charged lo my account. — Cabbage Com missions charged, and Dog's-Meat Charges disallowed. I must here request the reader to turn to Mr. Tudor's " :\lemorandnii-i of Proposal," and also to his Bill of Sale, and peruse thetn with special reference to the two fi)ilowing ques tions : First. After becoming Mr. Tudor's partner, could I anticipate 235 that the gains of the joint concern were, before a division of them between us, to be reduced by any charge on his part, in the shape of compensatidn for the attention given by him to our joint business ? After what had passed beiween us, had he any right whatever, in law or in justice, to seize upon and appropri ate to himself, under the name of a commission for his services to the concern, any portion of the proceeds of our business? Second. Had he, in law or in justice, any claim upon rae, as ice-house keeper, for any services essentially differing in kind, or e-ven in degree, from those rendered by me in thai capacity previously to becoining his parlner? With regard to the first of these questions, it is seen, that in neither of ihe two documents is to be found a word, directly or indirecfly intimating that Mr. Tudor was to receive any cotn- pensation for continuing to give lo the business in which he had sold me a fifth inierest the same agency which he had given when the whole belonged to himself. In his proposal, Mr. Tu dor had said, " At the termination of the present year you will be better able to know what the business will in all probability amount lo." How was this to inffuence me in my decision? How, but as one of the elements for ascertaining what the busi ness w^as worth? And how was this to be ascertained, but by striking the balance between the expenditures and the receipts? This balance showed what the property and business yielded ; and when the owner of that property and business invitetl anoth er to purchase a share therein, the invitation (in the absence of all intimation to ihe contrary) could not but be understood as being made with reference to the result oi the business, in regard to profit or income ; said result to be arrived at in the same way, for ihe future, that it had heretofore been arrived at. If, in keep ing his account with the Havana establishment, Mr. Tudor had been in the practice of distinguishing between the use of the capital invested therein and his own agency in making that cap ital productive, and, in consequence of such distinction of mak ing against the establishment, under the latter head, a certain charge as compensation for his services, his right to continue this practice, in staling the accounts of the establishment, after selling a share in it to any one duly notified thereof, would have been inctmtestible. But is it not equally plain, that after such sale, unless this were attended wilh a stipulation or explanation to that effect, he could have no right lo introduce this practice ? (a) (a) Besides this annual tax, under the name of "commissions," levied upon my share of the concern, there was, so far as 1 know to the contrary, auothei aunual 236 We wfll now pass to the second question : the one relating to the nature and extent of the services which he had a right to require of me. On this point, Mr. Tudor's Proposal says, " con ducting the business as at present;" which words determine no less the nature of ihe services which he proposed to me to render in consideration of the ten per cent and other advantages therein held out, than the amount of that compensation. His Bill of Scde says, " Mr. Damon is to charge the concern ten per cent for his services and remittances and other necessary care of the busi ness ; the same as last year. Here, also, it is "the same as last year." The only difference between this definition and that con tained in the previous document, is the one expressed by the words " and remittances ; " and a most important difference it proved lo be, not only to my " higher cares, trouble and anxiety," but to my pocket, as well as that of Mr. Tudor. tax, — to say nothing of occasional assessments, — levied upon it, in the shape of profits on the business of supplying the Havana establishment with ice. So far as I know aught of the principles of justice and fair dealing, the only course, on the part of Jlr. Tudor, at all compatible with them, was to charge those supplies of ice a/ cos*. Some men, standing towards others in the relation in which my purchase of a share in his estabUshment placed him towards me, would have felt a single cent of profit on those supplies burn in their pockets like a lump of frozen mercury. It is true that the obligation to furnish ice at cost was not ex pressly contracted by him; but if ever there existed any such thing as an implied obligation, surely there was one here. When he was sole owner of the establishment, — at that time when he proposed to me to become part owner of it, — there would have been absurdity in the idea of his charging the ice furnished to it, at anything more than the bare and exact cost What was the thing which he had sold to me, and which I had purchased ¦? Why, a share in the establishment, as then conducted. Agreeably to his proposal, I was to become the owner of one fifth thereof; and the income on my share was to be one filth of that same income, the whole of which would continue to be his if I should not accept his proposal. The sale being made, the income, — except so far as might be stipulated to the contrary, — was not to be subject, previously to its being divided between us, to any other deductions or charges than it had been sub ject to at the time the sale was proposed. That Mr. Tudor's " commission " tax was not the only one levied upon the share he had sold me, I do not positively affirm ; for I have not the materials at hand to substantiate such an assertion. But I do say, that I positively believe that he was very far from governing himself by the principle of supplying our establishment with ice at cost; and I do affirm that his course afforded more than one ground for my belief In July, 1829, 1 wrote him as follows : " 1 have your account of e.xpenses for this year, made out by Mr. Wyeth; and I there observe that you continue your $ 500 commission, although there is an extra charge for clerk hire. I also perceive, that the cargo of the Fiancis is brought into the account. I hope there will be a sum equal, to balance it, from the insurers." This, I give as a sample. To mention but one of the more general grounds upon -ivhirh my belief arose: Mr. Tudor proposed, on more than one occasion, that I (!) should name (of course reserving to himself the right to agree or not) the price per ton at which the ice shipped to our establishment should be charged. If my helieldoes him injustice, he possesses the materials for demonstrating this, by proving that he made no profit on the suppUes to our establishment. If he can .prove this, — or even that the aggregate cost, and nothing beyond the cost, of supply ing the ice furnished to his different establishments, was charged to them and di vided between them according to the quantities shipped to each, — I shaU cheer- lully acknowledge that I am now laboring under an erroneous imcression. 237 Whflst intrusted with the Ice House as his agent, I had at first had no other trouble or responsibility, connected wilh the income of the establishment, than that of receiving the proceeds of sales, and paying them over daily to the commercial house by which his funds were remitted to him and the usual com mission was charged ; which customary commission at Havana was, in case of guarantee of the bflls remitted, 2^ per. cent ; and without guarantee, 1| per cent (b) Thus stood the matter, at the time his Proposal was made, in May, 1823 ; which proposal was but a written " memorandum" of' — to use his own words a year after — " the wish which I pressed upon you in March and April." Down to this time, the services, of which he was so anxious to secure the continuance, at an increased compensation beyond the 10 per cent, had in volved no further care or responsibility, regarding his funds, than that above stated. A short time after, however, just previous to his departure from Havana on his return to Boston, he expressed the wish that, instead of paying over his money, as previously practised, I would retain it in my own care and remit lo him monthly. In an unguarded moment, I assented, (c) This, (b) It will be seen that be held me strictly to the guarantee. Even after an un doubted bill had been accepted, he would still keep himself safe behind the formula — " which, when duly paid, shall be passed to your credit." (c) It was a hasty and inconsiderate acquiescence on my part, which, under the circumstances in which we then stood, could not be ascribed to any other motive than a friendly and Uberal desire to gratify and to serve him. Although it was a great saving to him, it was on my part (to say nothing of the personal risk attend ing it) a purely gratuitous assumption of most serious trouble and anxiety; for, no addition to the compensation I had been receiving whilst free from this care, was offered, and none was asked ; and, seeing that Mr. Tudor's wish that I should consent to continue in the post was already as urgent as it could well be, I could not, in giving my assent to this modification of the " as at present," referred to in his previous proposal, have been influenced by any such motive as a supposition that my assent might be necessary to secure such a disposition on his part. The service, then, was a purely gratuitous one, valuable to him, and, to my self, onerous in the extreme, and even dangerous, as he himself subsequently proved that he was conscious of its being. And yet, mark the sequel! It proved the cause of reproaches and gratuitous insults from him, without number; nor was this all, for my pocket was made to suffer. Towards the close of 1825, — -when the amount which I had thus been remitting to Mr. Tudor, since the formation of our partnership, was about $30,000, — I had the mishap to purchase for him a biU for JE400, which turned out to be worthless. I had bought this particular bill in preference to others, solely because he had enjoined it upon me not to buy bills always of the same persons. I had good reason to believe the bill trustworthy, or I should not have bought it ; but it turned out to be good for nothing. The commissions which I had saved him exceeded the amount, many times told. Nevertheless, so soon as be had reason to suppose the money was in jeopardy, he wrote to me saying : " I know not how I can credit you with such a draft, when neither drawee nor drawer are anywhere to be found. In my opinion it will be lost. I shall leave it with you to determine whether you think I ought to lose by your taking a bill which all sober-minded people would say was bad before it left Havana." This is a aamplf of the "liberality" with which the "poor miserable carpenter'" 238 however, was the only modification of the " as at present," pro posed in May, 1823, which entered into our subsequent agree ment of January, 1824. And yet, we have seen what vast addi tions to ray duties, as determined by this standard, had been imposed upon me, by the force of circuinstances, — circumstances which 1 could not have forseen, but which Mr. Tudor could not but have foreseen, (in their general character at least,) and which he was bound in good faith to apprise me of. Such was the slate of the case, in reference to the two points, presented by the above questions. And now for those " improper letters," the reference lo which by Mr. Tudor has pro duced this Appendix. In a letter from hira, under date Dec. 1, 1824, occurs the fol lowing paragraph : " I shall, when I get your accounts lo the close of this month, make up the accounts for the year. I have been in doubt what I should charge the concern as my commissions. The Charles ton and Savannah Ice Houses are charged $200 a cargo, or rath er a year. I think $500 will be about right for Havana ; so that you will pay $100." To this, 1 replied, under date Dec. 27, as follows : " I received your No. 33, after sunset, when I had completed a hard day's work of digging, setting posts, &c. ; and nothing could have induced me to write this evenino- but your mention of .$500 commissions, — a thing never stipulated for, or even thought of by me before now. In consequence of which 1 now inform you that I shall charge the concern $3 per day for my labor daring the addilion, [an addition to the Ice House - which I was then cnnslructing, in pursuance of his " instruc tions."] 1 shall expect a commission on all the remittances made to you. Your charge of commissions amounts to upwards of 25 per cent, on the amount of your bill, -^.vhich, in iTiy opinion, is high. You would not allow me anv commission on the sale of cabbages and apples, but have yourself charged near 30 per cent, on ibe pi-irchase." [The articles herein referred to, used to accompany the cargoes of ice. Mr. Tudor had proposed, that, in consideration of their perishable nature, they should be exempt from my 10 per cent cornmission, and 1 had consented.] Such was the " improper letter" relerred to by Mr. Tudor! On receipt of it, he had stood aghast at my ineffable audacity, and was afterwards to be reproached, as what he owed his fortune to I In my reply, after stating the reasons which had determined me to purchase the bill, {and also another, which he supposed to be bad, but which proved good,) 1 say, " I leave it altogether with you, whether I shall be credited with them or not.'' There- suit was, that the loss of the entire amount was thrown upon me ! ! 239 had entertained serious " thoughts of discharging you as Ice House Keeper, or reducing your pay one-half" He deigned, nevertheless, lo enler into a justification of his commissions, as follo\-\-s : " The charge of a commission for transacting the business of a concern is universally done, in all the ice-houses in which I am concerned, and in all business that I ever heard of I might as well ask you to sell the ice gratis in Havana, in consequence of your owning a fifth, as you should expect 1 ara to do the busi ness of the concern here and in Havana for nothing because I own four fifths." The reader cannot fail to be struck with the exact parallelism of the two cases; and how perfectly this argument meets my ob jection, that nothing of ihe sort had been stipulated for, nor inti mated, when he had urged and induced me to consent to become his parlner. He goes on : " With respect to the awounl of the commission, $500, I an swer, that 1 endeavored to be particularly moderate; and I may add that I should willingly give $1500 to any person who would and could take my place. I would, out of my own pocket, give even $1500 to be relieved from the excessive care, trouble and anxiety of the Havana concern. But there is no person who could lake my place, or who can, were I to give that or more." And so, because Mr. Frederic Tudor would have willingly given $1500 to any one "who would and could" reWeve him from "the excessive care, trouble and anxiety" which he found it to his account to rernain subject to, as owner of four fifths of the Havana concern ; because of this willingness in regard to his own anxieties and his own pocket, he was " particularly moderate " in taking no more than $100 a year out of my pock et, in the shape of a contribution to indemnify hira for his " ex cessive care,'' &c., levied upon the fifth part of the concern, which he had sold me without the remotest hint that it was sold and purchased subject to any such tax! Again, coming to the sub ject of ihe cabbages, he says : " You talk improperly about my refusing a commission to you on apples, &c., and chiarging myself thirty per cent. The subject is not worth reraai-king upon, for its amount; and I only speak of it merely to say in answer, that I raake no charge on these things whatever of commissions. In the conduct of the business here, were there no care or concern but about shipping ice, apples and cabbages, a very small commission would suffice; but in the higher cares of this ctmccrn, in attending to everything necessary, a very large commission is in fact earned, but which I have not charged, and should, as I said before, be wflflng to 240 pay, could I find a substitute. You may rest assured I shafl not reduce that charge." Here we have it again. This twenty-five and thirty per cent is not lo be considered in the light of a vulgar " commission." It is no such thing; it is a sort of tertium quid, resulting from the operation of Mr. Tudor's " particularly moderate " and generous disposition, — a mediura beiween the "very small commission," which "would suffice" if it were only a vulgar shipment of cabbages, &c., and the " very large commission, in fact earned," by Mr. Tudor's attention to the " higher cares." And this logic, I had to rest satisfied wilh ; this " black mail" levy, I had lo put up with, as the alternative to going to law about $100 ! And let it be noted, that this notable illustration of the " they may take who have the power" principle, comes from a man who had not only sold a share in his business without any intimation that it was to be subjected to any such tax, but who, (to use his own expression after the sale,) had effected that sale through a reluct ant yielding on my part to " the wish which I pressed upon you;" and who afterwards acknowledged the truth, that he had ralher be the owner of four fifths of the concern under my management, than of the whole under the management of another, — an ac knowledgment, too, which was made without reference to his relief from that load of cares and troubles and anxiety which he had contrived to throw from his own shoulders upon mine ; for it was made at a time when, thanks to ray exertions, all " anx iety " was at an end, and the business stood upon a perfectly se cure footing in every respect, and it was with reference solely to my ordinary services, that the estimate was made, (d) With regard to the charge for the work of my hands as carpenter and laborer, which I notified to him my intention to make, in con sequence of the charge so unexpectedly presented by him, no one apprized of all the circumstances of my position, will question that it was one that I had a perfect right to make, even without the provocation but for which it would not have been made. And yet, his reply contains a denial of ray right to charge for this labor, or for any other possible service, which, after it should have been rendered, Mr. Tudor might see fit to say was but part of ray duty, express or implied." " Respecting your charging anything for any labor, or for re- (d) In a hostile letter under date July 8, 1835, (written to serve as a sort of ground work for a claim for heavy damages,) after calling upon me to return to my "duty," in devoting myself to the care of the establishment, he says ; " I have repeatedly told you, and I now again write you, that I consider it rather a loss to me to have the whole of the Havana ice-business, as I have at this time, than to have my interest of four fifths protected and looked after, as it would be if you fulfilled your engagements." 241 mittances, or anything which, by contract, it is the express or im plied duty of the ice-house keeper to perform, you cannot." Such was Ihe result of the objections which, in the reckless ness of my disloyal temerfly, I dared to make to the accounts of my flege. Nor were the objections altogether on my side. My own accounts were transmitted at the same period, and Mr. Tu dor found the occasion most favorable for retaliation. If I had found "cabbage" commissions (or cabbaging commissions, if the reader pleases) in his account, my own was open to the objection that it contained a "dog-meat" charge. Even so! I had kept a dog to guard the premises, and the cost of his maintenance had been charged among the expenditures of the establishment, as had also that of the food of a man hired in its service. On this subject Mr. Tudor says: " I now come to your account, which I suppose will prove correct in the castings, and everything except the charge for nine months board of a hired man, and the board of a dog. Both of these are utterly disallowed." This was written on the 8lh of Feb. 1825, — just two months and eight days after the foflowing had flowed from the same pen : "I have some fear that handling specie at the ice-house may sometimes be discovered by the bad gente (people) in the neigh borhood. Nothing can be more dangerous than a knowledge of this kind amongst this class of people ; your personal safety would be endangered. " I have often told you not to apjoear unprotected; be rather al ways on your guard. In my last, I recommended particularly tlmt you have a good DOG. A Spanish ladron (robber) never makes an attack upon one who is looking out, and who is always ready for defence." From this, it is seen that Mr. Tudor was no less solicitous about ray personal safety from robbers, in Dec. 1825, than he had been in May, 1823, about the safety of the sarae precious person from shipwreck the ensuing winter. In the one case, in order to determine rae not to attempt the passage round Cape Cod " at that stormy season," he offered to pay two ounces towards ray travelling expenses by a safer route ; that is, provided always that I should be travelling to Boston in the intention of continuing my connection with Mr. Tudor's interests, and of returning to Havana in compUance with his earnest wish. In the other case, he is "particularly" desirous, I should "have a good dog," so that I might have a chance for my life, even although robbers should be tempted to assail it by that " specie " which Mr. Tudor was requiring me to keep hoarded in a very exposed and danger- 31 242 ous position, in order that he might be gainer of the amount of that commission which he used lo pay for safe keeping and re mittance to the mercantile establishment where it used to be de posited every afternoon. Wefl then I It turns out, that this "good dog," -v\'hich Mr. Tudor, whilst trembling for the fate of his " specie," was so tremblingly alive to the importance of my procuring, — this good dog had already been procured, and had perhaps been the means of saving ray Ufe many a night, and with it, Mr. Tudor's specie. And, inasmuch as he was not a chameleon, he had not lived upon air, but had had dog's meat to eat And the cost of this rneatis one of the two things in my account, which Mr. Tudor " utterly disaflowed," by way of offset to my "impertinence" in finding fault with his snip — I beg pardon, I mean — cabbage commis sion. This' disallowance of the two charges in my account was afterwards revoked. But the $100 a year, out of my pocket, ctmtinued to be taken. If I was not satisfied, why, " the Courts are open;" — this being the standing reply to all impertinent objec tions from rae to cabbage commissions, or any other petty spoli ations of which the above may be taken as samples. (E.) 1829 — 30. The post of Ice-House Keeper relinquished by me, April 17,1830. — Resumed temporarily, August 27. — Again relinquished, December 21. — Game played by Mr. Tudor in regard to this matter, and kept up for about a twelvemonth. — Our Corres pondence renewed by him. — His Love for Strict Discipline ex- emplifi.ed.. — My Notification to him regarding Payment of Cer tain Notes of his, held by me. — Novel Illustration of the Legal Doctrine of " Set-off." Late in December, 1829, I received from Mr. Tudor, un der date Nov. 26, a letter replete wflh insult, announcing his fixed determination to subject the ice-house keeper lo certain new rules and regulations, and to reduce my compensation one half; and desiring that, if I did not see fit to retain the post upon those terms, I would place it in charge of some one else. Although I was far from believing that he possessed, either in law or in equity, any right to make any such reduction, I was so heartfly sick of my connection with him as to experience any thing but regret at the occasion for relinquishing the post which everything had conspired to render hateful. In my reply, besides 243 giving various explanations called for by his unfounded charges and unjust pretensions, I say : Dec. 29, 1829. " Your No. 33, of the 26lh ult, is received. I have read it, and pondered on it ; and if you had appointed or named a successor, I would gladly have left the ice-house with out any reply, as you have mentioned in your letter. But, as I have heretofore told you that I could not think of taking the responsibflity of appointing my successor, and you have seen fit not to do it, I feel myself obliged to make some reply." — " Afl the protestations I have made against the accusation of employ ing your money for my own use, appear lo have no other effect than to call forth more and stronger accusations. I make no more protestations ; but I would be glad, if any one has given you information to that effect, that you would inform me who it was." — " You have, within a few months, accused me, in effect, of telling you untruths ; but never before was it mentioned. I wish you may get an ice-house keeper who will spend as much of his time in the ice-house, and put his hand lo the work as I have done." — " Restitution I have none to niake ; for I have taken naught from you; but if you think I have not earned my wages, or that I have made too much money, I will refer you to my letter of the 14th March, 1825. I want nothing but that which belongs to me. If you had informed me, three or four months ago, that you intended to reduce my pay on the 1st of January, 1830, I should have given you seasonable notice to procure another ice-house keeper in season. To this reduction of pay I do not assent." Here, then, was an opportunity for Mr. Tudor. All he had to do was, to send out an ice-house keeper, or even to name some person in Havana whom I might place in charge without being responsible for his conduct, and should this ever prove bad, subjecting myself to future accusations and perhaps " ac tions for damages" upon this ground. On the 6th of Feb. 1830, acknowledging the receipt of his letter of Jan. 9, I say : " I am happy to learn that your brother may be expected here every day; who, I hope, will have power over the affairs of the ice-house, as well as those with the Government." Feb. 21. " Yesterday afternoon your brother arrived, by whom I have received your No. 3. I have had but Uttle talk with him, but by your lelteV I see ihat he has full power to act in all cases, and I hope to have some conversation wflh him on the points of disagreement If he shall call on me as interpreter between him and Don Nicolas Escovedo, or any other persons, T assure you that I wfll do as well as I can, although you have been pleased lo cafl me 'disloyal ;' but I hope he may have been in structed to take some one else." 244 But it turned out that Mr. Henry Tudor had not been provided with either instructions or power "lo act in all cases." (a) He called upon me for assistance in all matters, but could do noth ing towards releasing me from my position by appointing a suc cessor. Early in March, I received Mr. Tudor's letter No. 4, contain ing, among other matter, the following : Feb. 22. " I shafl make no change in [the] allowance to you as ice-house keeper per my No. 33, of 26ih Nov. last You wifl observe that by the reduction of the 10 per cent to 5 per cent on the gross sales, you increase the general dividend. ¦ — Thus, if this reduction had taken place last year, there would have been added to the profits about $945, of which you have a fifth. When your commission is $1000, at the 5 per cent, you make by the reduction $200 more. To this, the 5 per cent, (for the pres ent) on the Matanzas business, for care, receiving and remitting, will add another $100. In all $1300, which is something more than double what the business can be well done for. " I have an excellent raan ready, and could have fifty, to lake your place, at half the amount of the 5 per cent, and one who I hope will not so soon forget his duty. I am desirous of having you leave my concerns ; and you are to write to me your deter mination on ihe Matanzas aff'air, and also respecting your accept ance of the reduction. In order that no time be lost in useless writing, your answer will be definitive on both subjects. My mind is made up. It will doubfless be better and more satisfactory to you to leave the employ. It must be painful to you to be con tinually reminded of duty neglected. It is, I assure you, unsat isfactory to rae to have a man in my employ who knows better than I do how my business should be conducted." " I shall allow you five per cent on the sale of crucibles. It is an excellent sale. (a) Mr. Tudor's No. 3 began as follows : " My brother comes out to Havana with full power to act for me in all cases whatever, and he will converse with you on the subject of the inconvenient derange ment which is caused to me by inattention to the regularity and uniformity in re- rnitiing. In fact, if you cannot get over this great deficiency of yours, itis not pos sible to allow you, on any terms, to have the charge of nay concern in Havana." But, so far from bis coming prepared "to act for me in all cases whatever," he had not come at all prepared to act with reference to the very point here specified, to wit : the quesuon whether I should, or should not, continue to hold the post of ice-house keeper. With regard to the " great deficiency," here spoken of by Mr. Tudor, he had just been replied to, for the hundredth time : " To make remittances at the close of each month, I believe to be as impracticable now, as I did when I wrote you on the 3d of last September. I found it so on the 1st of January last, or I should not have scut an order on Mr. H. for the balance of accounts of last year. 245 " Wrhe a prompt and decided answ-er to this letter." (b) This medley of coaxing and bullying is what I received, instead of the successor whom I had a right lo expect The reader will not fail duly to admire the ingenuity of the argu ment, in which Mr. Tudor deemed it worth his while to expend his peculiar mixture of logic and arithmetic, to coax me into the belief, that by accepting five instead of ten per cent (and this upon the gross amount of sales,) as the compensation for my services, I should, as owner of one-fifth of the net pro ceeds, " make by the reduction." This farrago was repUed to, as follows : March 13. " Your No. 4, 22d of February, together wflh a letter to your brother, were received last Monday, when I carried (b) This is the main body and conclusion of the letter. The beginning is as follows : " I have your accounts, to the close of the year. They will be examined. Your c'narge for a hired man, — exceeding a dollar a day through the year, — is quite high, considering that it was never agreed to allow you a servant ; occasional assistance has always been admitted." He is here seen to assert, that it had " never been agreed, ^x." Let us go back to the year 1824, the first year of our partnership. The reader need not be told of the multifarious calls upon my time. at that period, and ever since ; and that these, generally, were of a nature to require me to be running about town, and often to lose much time, seeking or awaiting an opportunity to converse with people, on subjects which Mr. Tudor ought to have been there to attend to himself An assistant in the ice house was, therefore, absolutely indispensable ; it was a phy sical impossibility that the business should get along wiihout one. Most men, indeed, situated as Mr. Tudor was with regard to me, would have felt it incum bent upon them, in common honesty and decency, to give roe a carte blanche on the subject, and to enjoin it upon me to employ, not one, but a number. This, how ever, never suggested itself to the patron, who has made people believe that I am in debted to his liberality and generosity for my fortune. I was left to my own resources. An assistant was employed by me, and his wages charged in my account. It was this man's victuals, which, together with the dog's meat, had constituted the two items in my account '' utterly disallowed" by Mr. Tudor, in February, 1825. [See Appendix (D).] On that occasion I had replied to Mr. Tudor : " I do not see why the dog's board is not a legitimate charge, and the man's also ; the one is employed to work, and the other as a guard, not only of my person, but the ice house and that which belongs to it." " The man I have with me, is the Greek you saw here some twenty months since," &c. Through the expansibility of my patron's generosity, the disallowance was revoked, the employment of the man was approved, and his victuals allowed. Subsequently, towards the close of 1S25, this assistant asked to have his wages raised, and I wrote on the subject to Mr. Tudor, who replied as follows: "Re specting the Greek, who wishes to have his wages to be increased, I leave that to your discretion. "You [know] that white men do not obtain so high wages as colored, because they are plenty and of less value. If you think it expedient to ¦ increase the pay of Antonio, I shall not object." The necessity for my having an assistant continuing, I continued to employ one from that time to the date of Mr. Tudor's present letter. And yet we here see him, when intent upon finding grounds for "restitution" demands, putting down in black and white, that it had "never been agreed to allow" me an assistant I or " servant," as he finds it convenient to call him ; by way, perhaps, of conveying the idea, that I had been making, against the concern, a charge for the wages of a body-servant. 246 the one for your brother to him. After reading your letter to me, I showed it to him, who was sick in bed, and wished I would wait a day or two, that he might get up from his sick ness before I should write. To-day is the first of his going abroad, and I have asked him if he had power to come to a close wilh me, as ice-house keeper, when he said no ; his mission was merely to attend to the subject of a new ice-house, &c. This puts me under the disagreeable necessity of informing you again, that I cannot accept of the reduced commission on any account, more particularly as I am not wanted ; and I would have been glad if you had sent my successor. " "The Matanzas affair, I beg leave to put off until I see you in Boston, which will be, God permitting, in a short time after my successor arrives." Another month elapsed, and still no successor ! I then wrote as follows : April 11, 1830. Yours of the 13th uito. was received per Nile, on the 2d instant, and I have shown it to your brother, and told him that I could not think of stopping here [at the ice house] any longer ; who said he would read over your letters again, and see what his inslructions directed him to do, but he has not given me any answer yet." April 19, 1830. " A man has been procured to take charge of the ice-house, and he entered on his duty the 17lh instant." From this lime, I ceased to correspond with Mr. Tudor. I ex pected, indeed, to leave Havana immediately, and to settle with him, face to face, at Boston, all that remained to be settled between us. At the earnest request of Mr. Henry Tudor, I consented to continue to reside at the establishment, during the few days (as I thought) that I had to remain, and to give my attention lo all the matters with which he had been charged, as his brother's representative. In a week, or less, — after placing provisionafly in the post of ice-house keeper the person (a Mr. Limbough) whom I had procured for him, until the individual mentioried by his brother should have arrived, — he departed on his return to Boston ; and my own departure being delayed from time to time, I advised him, by frequent lelters, of the progress of the matters to which he had requested ray attention. On the 22d April, I wrote lo a friend at Boston : " I believe the difference between Mr. Tudor and myself is now coming to a close; and if so, there is no Ukelihood of any ever occurring again, as I now have no charge here, [at the ice house] only by request of Mr. Tudor's brother, lo look after and advise the man here, so long as I remain. I expect to leave this for New Orleans, soon ; from which place I shafl take pas- 247 sage up the river, as far as Ohio or Indiana, and then travel along to the eastward, slowly." On the 24th Aprfl, I wrote to the gentleman at Matanzas, who gave an eye to our business there : " Mr. Henry Tudor has transferred the agency of the ice business, to the house of Messrs. Scufl, Storey & Co., and placed a man to take charge of the selling of ice, and then returned to Boston, for which place I expect to set out in ten or twelve days." On the 26th of May, I -wrote to Mr. Henry Tudor : " On account of my agreeing to settle the accounts of the ice-house, I was detained here until I lost the opportunity of going to New Orleans, as I expected ; and now, I fear that by the next oppor- 'unity for New Orleans, it will be too late for me take the course through the western country ; so it is likely I shall remain here the best part of the coming month, and then lake passage direct to Boston." The engagement here referred to, " to settle the accounts," had been entered into by me, at the desire of Mr. Henry Tudor, and to oblige hira. An incident, connected with it, occasioned the renewal of my correspondence with my partner. It will be seen that, in the performance of my promise, I had advanced money out of my own pocket, which was to be repaid from the receipts of the ice-house ; that the re-payment of a portion of this money was refused by Mr. Limbough, the ice-house keeper, on the ground that he had not received instructions from Mr. F. Tudor lo pay it; and that this refusal was applauded by that genfleman, through his fondness for good discipline. On the 15th June, Mr Tudor writes me a letter, in part (the rest of it being on the subject of the new contract we were then seeking to obtain) as follows : "Ihave received several letters from you ;(c) and have not -written, in expectation you had left Havana. I perceive by your account current of 22d uito., this is not the case. " I thought, upon reflection, you would not leave Havana at this crisis of affairs. The Brig Mars, for our concern in Matanzas, sailed some time since, and I hope may have arrived well. When you reflect upon the Matanzas affair, you will come right upon that question also, and matters will go along smoothly. " I enclose you copy of a letter to Limbough, who appears to be a really excellent man." (c) The letters referred to, had been received long before. They had all been written before I had retired from the post of ice-house keeper. Mr. Tudor seems to have thought it best to appear not to have become aware of the fact, that I had dropped all correspondence with him. He writes as if nothing of the sort had hap pened ; and yet he must have been avi'are of it, for at least two of my letters to his brother had been received. 248 The letter to Limbough was as follows : "I have received your letter on, the subject of your refusal to pay Mr. Damon more money than you were instructed to do. This was correct; although I have every confidence in Mr. Da mon, and he has considerable interest in the ice business for Havana and Matanzas, still, he knows loo wefl how very satis factory it is lo have an agent obey orders, not to be pleased (as my partner) with you, when you have obeyed your instructions even against him." (d) In my reply, after giving the details respecting the new con tract, in continuation of those contained in the lelters from time to time addressed to his brother, I say : July 31. " Your reflection hit ihe right place; it was the 'crisis of affairs' that has, and stifl keeps me here. I will be stifl more honest, to declare to you, (although it may ruin the already broken confidence you have in rae,) that had the entire destruction of one or even two years' sales depended on my stay here this season, I hardly think I could have been prevafled up on to stop. You may be assured that on litis contract, now pend ing, rests the Privilege of iyitroducing ice into this city for many years to come." " Mr. Scull tells me that his house has written you about in structions, and has recommended your appointing a general agent, SfC. ; for he could not think of taking any mure upon him self, than he had promised your brother ; and if I mistake not, my name was there mentioned, but in what manner I do not recollect. I really wish you would appoint somebody to attend to the affairs here, for I am very anxious to see you in Boston." "There are two things in which I ask your favor: "First, that you will not accuse rae of raeddling with the duties of the ice-house keeper, for anything I have written in this letter ; for, had I not subraitled to the request of your brother, — at the time very much against my inclination, — to remain in the ice-house so long as I should remain in this city, I should have known nolh ing, and ignorance would have kept me silent Setond, that you wifl appoint ihe general agent recommended by Mr. Scull, very soon; so that I may be released from my present disagree able state. These I shall receive of you as favors, and as such, will ever appreciate them. I wait your immediate ansiver after receiving this, if not anticipated in your letters to Messrs. Scufl, Storey & Co." Concerning the Limbough letter, which had been used by Mr. Tudor, as a pretext for renewing our correspendence, I say: (d) Here, under date June 15, 1830, is an acknowledgment of my being, at that time, Mr. Tudor's "partner." The reader will please bear this in mind. 249 " I have to thank you for the copy of your letter to Mr. Lim bough, and particularly for that part where you make mention of the confidence you stiU appear to retain in me. I know not what Mr. L. wrote you about giving rae more money than his instructions w^ould aflow. If my recollection serves me right, he was ordered by your brother, to repay me what I might have to pay out, over and above the balance then due the ice-house from me ; and I can hardly see why a mistake of raine to bring in a specific sum should debar me from it If such is the case, it is very dangerous, indeed, to raake mistakes or omissions." After slating that I had not seen fit to quarrel with Mr. L. for refusing this repayment, " although he says he remembers per fectly well, seeing me give a sura of money to your brother the day previous to his sailing," (which was the item refused,) I tell him that he could not but think that his own course afiforded just cause of complaint; -"when I had arranged matters in and about the establishment, as well as time would admit, previous to your brother's deparlLire, and then consented to take upon myself, at the request of your brother, certain debts due from the establishment, lo be repaid from the funds accruing to the establishment, — to be refused the repayment of a certain part, because it whs omitted in the first account exhibited ; and then for you to send me a copy of a letter to the person who refused me justice, lauding him for it, ' although I have confi dence in Mr. D.,' — this puis rae in raind of a common saying when I was a carpenter's apprentice-boy, 'fed with roast beef, and then beaten with the spit' " [It is to be observed, too, that with all these compliraents to Mr. Daraon, and to Mr. Lim bough, for his rigid adherence to the rules of good discipline, no order came to rectify the injustice committed through that rigid ity, by repaying the money which I had advanced !] Wilh respect to the " Matanzas affair,'' I say, in a letter writ ten a few days after : " whether my mind wfll ever be correct on the subject of Matanzas or not, it is impossible for me to say. That it will never be in unison with yours, as expressed in letters on that subject, is my sincere opinion at present." My reply, from which the foregoing extracts are taken, was closed in August, upwards of five months after the dale of Mr. Tudor's letter of the 22d February, wherein, after stating, " I HAVE an excellent man ready, and could have fifty, to take your place, at half the amount of tho five per cent," he had wound up with " write a prompt and decided answer to this letter." I had conformed literally to this "instruction." On turning to my reply of March 13, the reader will see that it was as decided a one as could well be written ; and that, although delayed some 32 250 days, by the illness and the request of his own representative, it was also prompt. Upwards of four months had elapsed since it had been received by Mr. Tudor ; and yet his " exceUent man ready" had not yet appeared above the Havana horizon; nor did he ever show his face. Let the reader ponder upon the course of events at this period; and then decide, whether he does or does not believe that Mr. Tudor told the truth, when he asserted, " I have an excellent man ready;" whether the conduct of this gentleman, from beginning to end of the episode we are now engaged in, does or does not deserve to be called a game; and whether it is or is not in perfect keeping wilh the other parts of the poem. If neither the " exceflent man," nor anyone of the "fifty" others, made his appearance, lelters came as thick as black berries. The ice once broken by the compliment of enclosing me a copy of his letter to Limbough, Mr. Tudor seemed deter mined not to let the opening freeze up again. Whflst awaiting his concession of the last " favor " 1 had asked of him, I had lelters in abundance to reply to, although not of the sort which I desired, or which the gentleman desired, who, at the urgent request of his brother Henry, had consented to attend to his business at Havana. What we both wanted, and expected by every vessel, (besides the appearance of his "excellent man ready,'' or of some other excellent man, who might not have been "ready" in February, but had got ready since,) was, cer tain deterrainations and dispositions on the part of Mr. Tudor respecting the Privilege and Contract then pending, and at a very critical point. Instead of this, there came letters to me, freighted with arguments upon the subject, which I had, (as I had a right to believe,) cut short and laid to rest, by my " prompt and decided answer " of March 13. From my reply to one of these missives, I will give some extracts : Aug. 16, 1830. " You say you know not why my letters have been directed to your brother, and that you never had written me that, on my leaving the ice-house, I would be incompetent to giving ihe directions, SfC. It was understood before your brother left this place, that I should remain here ten or fifteen days longer; and he requested me to have a representation made to the Cabfldo, and that I should look after it as long as I should remain here, and give account of, its progress, &c. To this, I at first objected, having reference to the second postscript of your No. 33, for 1829, dated Nov. 29, wherein you say I should be aflowed to come to the ice-house ^ only as a visitor ; ' (e) that (c) He had said, that in the event of my declining to remain in the post on the terms proposed, " the new ice-house keeper will be subject to no control on your part, and you will be allowed to come to the ice-house only as a visitor." 251 you had trusted me one year too long; that my disloyalty be gan, (tec, &c. But when he said he requested it on his own au thority, I consented, and told him I should make my communi cations to him. " Your brother, I recollect, urged the importance of my looking after the business, saying that my interest was at stake. This, I acknowledged; but your positive refusal to my being anything more than a visitor overruled my interest Nevertheless, after I had begun with the representation lo the Cabildo, I saw that the contract was likely to be lost, if I should not continue to follow it up. My determination has been, ever since I left charge of the house, and now is, not to meddle with the duties or rights of the ice-house keeper; when he has a.sked advice, I have invari ably given it ; but when not asked, I do not give any. " It is my opinion, that you want a person here to take charge of your affairs, in whom you should have greater confidence than you have had in any one who has had charge, at least for these eleven years past. If you do not, you wfll always be in hot water. You may give him some general instructions ; but they should not be too minute, nor too strictly to be observed. " You say you had no other course than the one you adopted, because I would not explain the reasons of not remitting, &c. (/) I gave you at the time all the reasons I had, and you as often said they were not satisfactory. When you accused me of ap propriating your money to my own use, I declared to the con trary ; and then I was called a liar, and disloyal, and you said that you should be indebted to me for the loss of your l-'rivilege, &c. When your fears of my using your money for myself were swept away by a remittance of ali, you slill persisted in your proposal of your new rules and the reduction of ray salary; nor did you clear me from the accusations of a — I say thief, for I know of no other term to give it — and a liar. I did not see fit to keep the house under those rules and those accusations. " You have said, in the postscript to your letter, that whenever I shall incline to accept the proposal made through your brother, I can do it, and lake charge again if 1 like it I do not know what proposal this is, as I have had no news from him since he left here. I recollect he advised me to accept of your proposal in your No. 33, and that I told hira I could not." At length, after long waiting, I received Mr. Tudor's reply to my letter of July 31 and August 4, which had concluded with requesting as a favor which I would " ever appreciate," the im- (f ) It is to be noted that 't every instance of an effort on his part to reduce my compensation, his determination to do so was put upon the ground of some imput ed misconduct in me. 252 mediate appointment of "the general agent recommended by Mr. Scull, so that I may be released from my present disagreea ble state." Instead of a compliance with my entreaty, there comes another argument, or rather a repetition of the old threadbare apologetic assertions, prefaced by a new asseveration of " confi dence;" all uttered, too, in the same old tone of master. August 26th, 1830. " I have received your letter of 30th ufl., with addition on 4th inst " I have never withdrawn my confidence from you. I have asked explanations, which you declined to give. When you wished to do wrong in the case of the Matanzas concern, I thought it time to take a stand against such a course, which never can be considered otherwise than as I have placed it " I reduced your pay, as I had a right to do. As my partner, and interested in the Havana and the Matanzas concerns, you are a different person from being keeper of the house and seller of the ice. As interested, and owner of part of the property, I had no control. How could I control, or take away, or lessen your property ? But as agent for the concern and sefler of the ice, &c., I had, and have, complete control. " Five per cent, on gross sales, is enough and rich pay for the services ; and rnore especially so, as you gained yourself one out of the five per cent, saved. " As to Mr. Limbough, I know very little about him ; and if he has conducted improperly towards you, I should think him very unwise; because it has always been in your power to dis place him, al your pleasure. I had no expectation you would refuse the ultimatum which I sent out to my brother. It was reasonable and just I think it remains. " As I have before repeatedly written, you can resume your situation ; but never on any other terms than those proposed in letters per Nile. " I contemplate shipping a full cargo from hence or Kennebec ; but the time when, will depend on circumstances and further advices. " All my letters to you contain no such words or suggestions as you suppose and say they contain ; I have carefully examined them. It would have been not difficult, to have established the good habit of remitting the 1st of every month, sent accounts and done as I wished. You would not What other remedy bad I than the one I adopted ? " The Matanzas concern requires looking to, and Ihe imposi tions of the government and people resisted in Ihat place." One thing to be noted in this letter, (wflh reference to his sub sequent course,) is, the acknowledgment of the fact that I was 253 his "partner ; " and, as " owner of part of the property," exempt from all control. Another thing is, that here, as on every other occasion, Mr. T. shows that he had confounded two entirely distinct things, to ^yit : his right to instruct me, as ice-house keeper, and his right to deprive me of the post, either directly or indirecfly, by lowering my compensation. Here, as everywhere else, he be trays this confusion of ideas : because I was subject, as ice-house Keeper, to his " control," in one sense, therefore I was subject to it with regard to deprivation of office. This is evidenfly his train of thought Indeed, by his language and his acts, through out, on this subject, he betrays a consciousness that he did not possess the latter right absolutely ; for the pretension was always advanced as a consequence of his right to instruct, and of my al leged disregard thereof. I would not, he said, conform to his in structions ; therefore, " what other remedy " had he ? The Irulh of the matter is, that this afleged disobedience was A\ pretext ; and only served to raake it obvious that he was conscious that he did not possess the right If the child ask for liquorice and sugar candy, as the "remedy " for a cold, when he has no cold, this pretence of a cold only serves to prove, that, besides a longing for sugar candy and liquorice, there is in him a consciousness that he has no right to them, except as a " remedy." Just so in regard to my 5 per cent, pearl, and the disease in Mr. T.'s ice house keeper ; the only " remedy " for which was, that said pearl should be gulped down by Mr. T., after the fashion of the African doctors, who cure their patients by kindly swallowing the " remedy." Another thing to be noted is, the reproduction of Mr. T.'s pe culiar mixture of logic and arithmetic; which, if he have not taken out a patent for it, only serves to prove the unbounded- ness of his " generosity" to the public, no less than to his ice house keepers. He had announced his determination, that if I remained ice house keeper, I must do so subject to new rules, and at half the stipulated salary. He had instructed me to " write a prompt and decided answer," " in order that no time may be lost" in despatching the " exceflent man " whom he had "re'ady" to take my place, at one half of the half generously offered me. My answer, prompt and decided, and repeated over and over, had been, that his new rules did not suit me, that I would con sent to no reduction of my compensation, and I wished to be relieved as soon as possible. And now, at Ihe end of August, instead of sending his " excellent man," he sends me : " Five per cent, on gross sales is enough and rich pay for the service ; and 254 more especially so, as you gained yourself one out of the five per cent saved." {g) Another thing to he particularly noticed, (with reference to his subsequent course,) is, speaking of Limbough, " Jil has always been in your power to displace him cd pleasure." Under a\\ the circumstances of L.'s appointraent, this was an absurdity. The appointment had been made by Mr. Henry Tudor, in con sequence of ray refusal to continue in the post, at a lime when I expected to leave Havana immediately ; and I possessed no shadow of authority to remove the incumbent, or lo interfere wilh him in any way. And yet, see what Mr. Frederic here says! In the course of a few months, we shall see from the same hand a totally gratuitous and insulting denial that I had possessed any authority to displace Mr. L. ! ! A short extract from my reply will suffice : " You say you have asked explanations, which I have declined to give. I have read your letters from No. 23, 1829, to No. 6, 1830, and likewise all my answers to them, and can see nothing that I could have said more in explanation, and you as often said it was not satisfactory. I know of nothing more I could have done. You say that your lelters contain no such words or sug gestions as 1 suppose and say they contain ; for you have care fuUy exarnined them. I will refer you to your No. 33, of 1829, 6th charge, (for a liar) the latter part of which says ' it arnounted to tefling rae what was untrue;' to the 3d charge, (for what I have called in one letter, iliief,) 'eraploying the money of the Ha vana Ice House, — both last year and the present, — in loans, or buying notes at excessive interest ; which interest you put in your own pocket, and which I require to be accounted for as part of (g) In the then state of the case, to send me any arguments on the subject, would have been deemed, by any other man than Mr. Tudor, indecent. But this argu ment was inherently absurd, and essentiallv preposterous. In the first place, it lost sight of the distinction between gross sales and net profits. There are few, if any, in the mercantile world, who would not gladly unite in a contribution that would make Mr. T. forget all disasters from coffee speculations, could he but make good, that one per cent, on gross sales and one per cent, on net profits, is one and the same thing. In the next place, the rule by which he here works would estab lish the fact, that, of the 5 per cent, which he proposed to cut me down to, he would pay but four ; and so, it would be a reduction from 10 to 4 per cent. And, although his rule was absurd, yet it was strictly true, that, so far as my 10 per cent. could be considered as coming out of his pocket, it had really been but 8 per cent. ever since I had become his partner. He has since declared, that he considered four-fifths of the concern of greater value to him, under my management, than the whole under that of another. Although, therefore, the 8 of my 10 per cent, on the gross sales, which was contributed by Mr. T.'s four-fifth share, still amounted to 10 per cent, upon that share ; still, considered as a payment by Mr. T. for service re ceived by Mr. T., the amount was but eight-tenths of that previously paid by hira for a less amount of service ; for such the former had been, if he considered it more advantageous to his interests to be owner of four-fifths than of the whole. 255 the revenue of the ice concern, without consenting to the loans if slill at risk.' " At the close of August, I consented, at the request of Mr. Tu dor's attorney at Havana, provisionally to resume charge of the ice-house, untfl Mr. Tudor should be able to send out a keeper. If there was one point upon which, more than any other, Mr. Tu dor was particular in his injunctions, it was, the importance of not disclosing the amount of sales of the establishment, lest it should give rise to exaggerated estimates of the value of the business and to subsequent rivalry and hostility. On reference to his letter of Aprfl 28, 1824, it will be seen Ihat he there lays down : " But the best privilege and the greatest security will be an exact attention that no whispering shall go abroad, that the ice business is very good. That this may not be the case, never forget the verbal instructions which I have given you to be fol lowed. Do not buy your bifls all of one house," &c. &c. Such was the vital importance attached by Mr. Tudor to secre cy. If important at any time, it was peculiarly so at the present, when we were about to obtain that exclusive Privilege whicli had been the object of our untiring endeavors (or rather of my endeav ors, and of /its desire and anxiety, with all the el celeras) for seven years. At this critical juncture, it came to my knowledge that the ice-house keeper was, through loquacity, violating Mr. Tudor's aU-important injunction. I lost no lime in advising him of the fact, which was immediately made known also to the house re cently selected by his brother to attend to his interests. Some days after, I advised Mr. Tudor of the result. Sept. 2, 1830. " By this you wfll learn that I have charge of the Havana ice-house. When I saw Mr. Storey again, he said that he had no power to place any one in charge of the ice house but myself, that having been given him in one of your late letters. I told Mr. S. that I thought it very improper to have the amount of sales made known, and as none could be placed in charge but me, I would do it, under, as I thought, the present critical affairs of the establishment, until you could be made aware of it As it respects the charge I have of the sales of ice, I consider myself under the direction of Messrs. Scull, Storey 4" Co., to whom I shall pay over the money from time to time." This letter was replied to as follows : Oct. 5, 1830. " I have received your letter of Sept. 2. It was pleasing to me again to see your hand-writing reporting sales, ^c. as in old times ; but your letter was not accompanied with any observations on the subject of the Matanzas concern. Until this is adjusted there can be no return to a just position. I shall not concede to you anything more than 5 per cent on 256 the gross sales, and am entirely indifferent whether you retain ilie position of^ keeper of the ice-house or not I am willing you should, as I have confidence in your correctness in the main. But I must confess to you, Mr. Damon, the Matanzas affair has hurt you wilh me very much, very much. It is not well what you have endeavored to do in that affair." (A) (h) I have quoted the passage entire, to preclude all pretext for the charge of garbling Mr. Tudor's letters by suppressing the expressions of dissatisfaction coupled by him with those of a contrary character. This renders it necessary that I should say a word regarding the " Matanzas affair," my conduct in which is here referred to as so very reprehensible. To explain it in such a way as to enable the reader to judge fully and conclusively of the respective merits of my course and that of Mr. Tudor, and whether mine afforded cause for its hurting me in the esti mation of any just man, it would be requisite to enter into details that would sen sibly swell the mass of matter belonging to the subject of the Havana ice-house. This subject is, in ilself, far too extensive to permit the introduction of others hav ing no proper connection with it. I must therefore content myself with giving a naked outline of the case, and stating that our Matanzas disagreement arose out of an experiment, determined upon by Mr. Tudor, to establish an ice-house at that place. The reader will see in the sequel, that, several years after the date of the above letter, Mr. Tudor's emphatic protestations of entire and never-interrupted confidence in my integrity, commenced in 1824, were reiterated. Consequently the severe "hurt" which I had on the present occasion received, in his good opin ion, must have proved quite a medicable wound, no less transient than severe. Towards the close of 1830, the Matanzas experiment liaving thus far, — after -some twelve or fifteen months trial, — proved a losing one, Mr. Tudor insisted that I was concerned in it as owner of two-fifths; whereas I considered that I had no share in it whatever. This was the disagreement. In regard to the nature of the grounds for it, a sufficient idea is afforded by the following particulars : Mr. Tudor, when the establishment at Matanzas was first determined upon by him, had proposed that it should be a joint concern of ours. I had assented, and expressed my willingness to take an interest of one-half. To this equality he de murred, and he expressed his willingness to admit me to so near an approximation as two-fifths. Thus the matter stood for some time ; when, in 1S28, it was re sumed in the way shown by the foUowing extracts from my letters : Aug. 29, 1828. " If you wish that I should go one-half with you at Matanzas, as has been heretofore talked of, I am willing; but 1 would not wish to go anything less than one-half Please to let me know your mind, on the receipt of this." Oct. 21, 1S2S. " I observe what you say in your No. 19. I have heard nothing from Matanzas since I sent a legalized copy," &c. &c. "I recollect perfectly well that you opposed my being half concerned in the Matanzas business, on the ground, if I recollect right, that you would lose the commanding part ; but I have 710 recollection of its being agreed to either way. I am not disposed at present to dis agree respecting Matanzas, even should you refuse to let me participate any in it; neither shall this loosen my exertions to obtain the Privilege there. But I will write more fuUy on this hereafter." Nov. 7, 1828. " In your No. 19, you say you had proposed my taking double the interest in the Matanzas concern than I have in Havana, and that you could not consent to any other proportion, &c., that you are giving up an important cus tomer of Havana. '¦You would be giving up an important customer of Havana, if no one else would ever take hold of Matanzas," &c. &c. "My object in going equally con cerned with you at Matanzas, was, to make money ; that is, I thought Matanzas might be profitable, and while I was here, I should have about all my property nearly, under my immediate inspection. But my vievi's are somewhat changed : not that I think Matanzas will be unprofitable, but that I may change my place of residence sooner than I was aware of." This, it is to be borne in mind, was written before the Matanzas establishment 257 I have quoted this to show in what way the news of the dis placement of Mr. Limbough was received. Wilh regard to the rest of the letter, — the remarks about my retention of the post, and the Matanzas affair, — I leave it to the reader to advert to the state of the case between us at the time it was written, and then to say whether fl was, or was not, afl a piece of " inexcusa ble impertinence," as Mr. Tudor once said of a remark of mine upon an item in one of his accounts. Under the circumstances in which this letter was written, could it have been written by any boy twelve years of age, imbued wilh a becoming sense of what was due to himself even ? But what will the reader think when he reads the foflowing : Nov. 22, 1830. " I hereby forbid you to proceed in the erec tion of an ice-house for my account in Havana. And it would be with very great satisfaction I should hear, as 'you have stepped in to prevent a fatal consequence,' that you would step out of my ice-house in the Plaza San Francisco. " And as you have turned out, without authority, a very ex ceflent man, that you would replace the said man and prepare yourself to answer to me for violations of the most plain con tracts." This is the entire letter. Suppose the " very excellent man" [It may be well lo say that I always bore explicit testimony to his honesty, so far as I had means of judging] had been turned was commenced, or any expense incurred there ; and my meaning, unless I greatly mistake, is very clear and indubitable. When I said, " I am not disposed at present to rfisogrcc respecting Matanzas," I meant, nonhat I consented to be interested in the new establishment on any other footing than that of equality , hut that Iwas not dis posed, should he persist in his refusal to admit me on that footing, to make this a ground of disagreement or contention. On the contrary, my views having chang ed, I was perfectly willing, and even glad, »io( to be interested in it. Betwen four and five months after, to wit ; in March, 1839, the pains I had for a long time been taking, were crowned with success, and I obtained the Privilege for Mr. Tudor, for two years. I made repeated journeys to Matanzas, and pre pared every thing for the reception of ice, the first cargo of which arrived in June. On the 27th July, Mr. Tudor wrote as follows : " The particular detail of instructions for Matanzas need not at present be gone into. I should prefer, if that should be profitable, to have you receive the avails; as your interest is two fifths in that undertaking, it may be better that you should do every thing relating to it." It is here seen, that Mr. Tudor, notwithstanding what had passed between us on the subject, undprtakes to agree for me that my " interest is two fifths in that under taking." In other words, I was to be a partner, whether I would or no; and for such precise share as it pleased him to allot me. He was immediately replied to as follows : Sept. 3, 1829. " I would wish to decline receiving the avails from Matanzas, if that concern should be profitable; and as you have refused, all along, my being equally concerned with you in it, I now inform you that I decline having any part in it." Such was the nature of the case. The use to which it was ultimately put by Mr. Tudor, in 1831, is seen in ^5. 33 258 out by me, — would this assertion of Mr. Tudor, that he had been turned out " wiihout authority," have been true, or have had the semblance of a shadow of truth, after I had received his letter of August 26, saying : " As to Mr. Limbough, I know very lit tle about him ; and if he has conducted improperly towards you, I should think hira unwise ; because it has always been in your power to displace hira at your pleasure ?" Most consistent of all gentlemen, and most accurate withal ! But Mr. L. had not been turned out by me. And this Mr. Tu dor positively knew. He had been turned out by his attorneys at Havana ; and I had consented temporarily to take the place, solely because Mr. Tudor had seen fit, not only not to send out any one of his fifty-one excellent men, but to restrict the pow er of appointment, recently given by him to his said attorneys, to my individual self. Most consistent, most accurate, most just, most liberal, most generous of all living gentlemen! Paragon of partners and of "patrons" ! where shall we find your match ? Thus much of the circumstances relating to my retirement from the post of ice-house keeper, and thus much of the game played by Mr. Tudor, in respect thereto. But the reader will naturally inquire, ivhat was the cause of this new outbreak ? In reply to this question I will state a few facts, respecting Mr. Tudor's pecuniary position at the time, and leave it to the reader to judge, whether, taken in connection wilh what he has seen of ray partner's character, they afford a suflicient ex planation of the motives, by which he was in this instance im pelled. It is seen, that he here forbids me " to proceed in the erection of an ice-house." Now, the course that our affairs had recently taken at Havana, was such as to leave us no option whatever in this respect ; and he had become apprised of my intention to commence operations, the instant a site should be obtained. But why should this put him beside himself? Because his pecuniary position was such, as to render the bare idea of the expense of the new building, absolute " distraction." The funds yielded by the Havana establishment he wanted, and most sorely wanted, for other purposes. This I state as a fact, because here is the proof of it, in another fact, (or, strictly speaking, a string of facts,) which' only served to aggravate the inconvenience to hira of the impending neces sity of applying to the erection of a new house, funds which had been prospectively appropriated, in his mind, to other ob jects. Mr. Tudor was my debtor, for raoney lent and advanced ; and this, in the not insignificant sum of about six thousand dot- 259 lars. (i) Subsequenfly to writing his letter of October 5, — ac knowledging mine of September 2, in reference to which he was graciously pleased to say : " It was pleasing to me again to see your handwriting, reporting sales, &c., as in old tiraes," — he had received another letter from me, under date of September 18th-26th, containing, among other matters, the following : " If my recoflection serves me right, it was understood, when you gave me your notes, that I was to give you notice of a month or two, before I called for their payment ; I now give you notice that I shall want them paid in December next, and I have written to Mr. Hobbs to have them ready for that time." The directions to my friend, here referred to, were as follows : " I wish you would, on receipt of this, demand the payment of them and interest Mr. Tudor wrote me, a litfle less than a year ago, that he would keep that raoney another year, if I did not want it, at five per cent I wrote him that I did not want it, and that he could act his pleasure as to paying or keeping it, but that I thought it worth more than five per cent Some three or four months afterwards, he wrote me that he understood, from the tenor of my letter, that I wished him to keep the money at five per cent, to which he acceded. To this last I made no reply, thinking I should be in Boston soon after. Should he stick at five per cent, for this year, you will let it go at that, but recover six per cent, for the previous time." So far, my string of facts goes to show, if anything, that Mr. Tudor was rather flush of money, than otherwise. Had this not been the nature of his position the year previous, he could scarcely then have made it an act of friendly condescension and Uberality to accommodate me, by retaining for another year, at five per cent, money which he had borrowed at six. And if this had been the state of the case the year previous, what reason is there for supposing that it had now become reversed? That reason consists in another fact, which I will now state, premis ing, however, that I do not by any means adduce it, as conclu sive proof that Mr. Tudor's position, in 1830, was the reverse of what it had in truth been a year before ; but simply as proof that it now was the reverse of what it might be supposed to have been a year previous, judging from his then apparent unwifling- ness to pay so high an interest as .six per cent After afl, the truth of the matter might be, that this unwillingness had been (i) By the settlement (or rather the liquidation) which took place between us, shortly after, the exact amount then due, and acknowledged by him, was $6,255 71. 260 but affected, — a mere stratagem, corresponding with other pieces of Mr. Tudor's diplomacy. Whether it was so or not, I leave it to those acquainted with the state of his affairs at that period, (fall of 1829,) to pronounce. My remaining fact is, that Mr. Tudor, although notified as we see he was, and although the demand was made upon him, was not able to pay me my money. And this inabflity existed, not only at that particular time, but for a very considerable time afterwards. When I say not able, I do not mean that it was an absolute impossibility to him, (for I do not know that this was the case,) but merely, that it was far more convenient to him not to pay. So far was this the case, that when, in the month of March foflowing, we made a final adjustment, (on the supposition that I was not to resume the post of ice-house keeper,) instead of paying me my $6,255, which I had repaired to Boston in the expectation of receiving, he gave rae an order for the amount on his agents at Havana, to be paid from the income of the establishment, as this should accrue. The reader is now in possession of the facts, from which I proposed he should judge for himself, as to the probable cause of Mr. Tudor's November outbreak. The reader may also con jecture for himself, whether those terrible words, " prepare your self to answer to me, for violation of the most plain contracts," are indicative of a design, on the part of the writer, to meet my demand for my $6,255, by a claim for damages " for violations of the most plain contracts," by way of what the lawyers call a " set-off." Immediately on the receipt of Mr. Tudor's letter, I made ar rangements for again retiring from the ice-house, and replacing it in the charge of Mr. Limbough ; which being done, I departed for Boston. (F.) [Referred to in § 4, near the end.] Extracts from my Letters, showing the extraordinary Non-com mittal Game played by Mr. Frederic Tudor, in regard to the closing of the Contract for the Renewal of the Privilege ; which Game terminated with his Letter of December 10, 1830, announcing that all connection between us had ceased, and that he did " not accept the New Contract." The reader is aware, that the mission of Mr. Henry Tudor to Havana had resulted in his inducing me to take anew the steps 261 for obtaining a renewal of the Privflege ; and then departing for Boston, after obtaining from Messrs. Scufl, Storey & Co., the promise to attend to his brother's business, and fiom me the promise to follow it up, during the short time I expected to remain at Havana. The fine of conduct which Mr. Frederic Tudor saw fit to pursue, under these circumstances, towards those genflemen and myself, is sufficiently shown by the foflowing extracts from my letters : June 11, 1830. [To Mr. Henry Tudor.] " Wflh my last, of the 27th uflo., I forwarded one of the Diario's, containing the ad vertisement of the Cabildo, setting forth the new propositions, and calling on any one that might wish to contract at a farther reduced price, to send in their propositions to the Secretary, &c. Since then, I have made it a point to see some one in the office every day or two, but could learn nolhing of a certainty until last Saturday, when the Escribiente sent for me, and said he was not knowing to any one having made any proposition, and although the fifteen days would not be out until the Mon day following, I had belter take the expediente, and have another representation made, accompanied by the advertisements, asking for a speedy conclusion of the contract, and hand it into the office on Tuesday. I took the expediente, and went and told Mr. Scull wdiat was done, and what was said was to be done. " Mr. Scull said, he was very much surprised at not having had by the Alfonso any letters of instructions from you or Mr. Tudor, and he -would call in Mr. Storey, to see if he had any. There was considerable consultation between them. Mr. Scull said he had no power to make the contract and if he should make it, it would be upon his own responsibility ; nevertheless, have the representation made, and it may be the full powers and instructions will arrive before it becomes necessary to sign the contract. The representation was made, and handed in on Tuesday ; and this afternoon I was in the office and saw that the Cabfldo had ordered the Coraisario to make out the con tract and send it to the Captain General for his approbation, and for him to send to the Intendant for the relinquishment of the duties." " If Mr. Scull had received his Power and instructions by the Alfonso, I should probably have left here before now ; but as it is, I shaU wait to see something about the contract, or at least until he gets his power." July 2. " In mine of June 11, I informed you that anolher representation had been made, asking for a speedy conclusion of 262 the contract, and that the Cabildo had ordered the Comisario to make it, &c. Since then I have frequently been to the Ca bildo office, and nearly as often cafled on the Comisario, who said he would attend to it ; and yesterday I was at his house three times before I could find him, when he said he had made a draft of the contract, and wished I would call this morning early and read it over with him to see whether it would be ac ceptable. When I went to the Commissary's house this morn ing, I found he had made almost an e.x.act copy of the last con tract, putting in even the names of the last securities. Mr. Scull not having seen the last contract, and it being necessary that he should see this, which the Commissary called a draft, I requested permission to take it wilh rae. Mr. Scull says it will do, after having made some little alterations ; but that he cannot think of binding himself to it without first having received instructions and Power of Attorney from Mr Tudor, and still expresses his surprise that none has arrived, nor even a word from Mr. Tudor." July 16. " In my letter of 2nd inst. I informed you that one of the Comisarios had given me what he called a draft of a contract, and that it was almost an exact copy of the last, and that it had been shown to Mr. Scull, &c. When I returned to the Comisario and told him that Mr. Scull said the contract was well, with some few exceptions, and that his House would be surety for the penal part of it, the Comisario said that was all very well, but that itivas necessary for the farther security of the penalty that there should be a mortgage given on real estate. This not having been hinted at when I took the draft to Mr. Scull, it was necessary to inform him of it, who said he would not mortgage any of his property on any account whatever." " The brig Commissary arrived on the afternoon of the 14th. ; and yesterday Mr. Storey told me they had received your broth er's Power of Attorney, with a letter, but no particular instruc tions. I then waited until Mr. Scull came in, and asked him (after having told him as above, what had been done in the Ca bildo) what should be done ? He said he had no particular instructions from your brother, and that he had said in his letter that it appeared unnecessary to have any penalty affixed to the contract until after the new house should be built, SfC. I believe you are aware that the • Coraisarios said, before you left here, that they could not do anything about the new house until it should be determined with whom the new contract was made ; that it was first suggested by Escovedo, and afterwards ordered by you, to have the sum of four thousand dollars inserted in the representation to be made as a forfeiture for the failure of the 263 supply of ice. It is now certain they will not close the contract without a mortgage on real estate, and it is possible that some thing wifl have to be done about the spot for a new house." July 31. [To Mr. Frederic Tudor.] "The Comisario said, that we could proceed to conclude the contract, if there was any place fixed upon where to build the new house; and the Intendant's oficio would come in in time. Having been posi tively refused a situation on this square, by the Director of En gineers, I requested the Comisario to hold an interview with the Director, and ask him to point out a spot where we might bufld, that he would not oppose. To this the Comisario con sented, and after a few days, told me that the Director said there was no place wflhin the line of fortifications that he could con sent to." " Mr. Scufl tefls me that his House have written to you about instructions, and have recommended your appointing a general agent, SfC. ; for he could not think of taking any more upon him self than he had promised your brother." Aug. 1 3. " Dr. Escovedo mentioned a hulk for the ice, or the building of a house in some other place that may be con venient for discharging, and to have a retail place in the city ; to all of which I objected, either on account of the expense or the loss of ice, when he said some such way must be adopted, for there was no hope from the Director of Engineers." — " When I was with Mr. D. yesterday, I mentioned the sfluation by the fish market, when he said he thought it the most Ukely place to be obtained." Aug. 18. " Yesterday there was an arrival from New York, and I called at Mr. Scull's house to see if he had received any letters from you, when I found there were none. He told me he had got his answer from the Governor, (about permission to build,) saying that he could do nolhing wilh a representation to hira, as he should be obliged to take counsel of the Director of Engineers, and as the Director had opposed it so strenuously heretofore, there was no hope of his favoring it now. " If it were not for the lot for a new house, the contract might as well be concluded to-morrow as next month, everything but the lot being ready; the Intendant having sent in his oficio two days ago, relinquishing the tonnage on ice vessels ; and the Ca bildo having agreed to take a mortgage on my property as a security for the penalty." Aug. 26. " I saw Mr. B. this morning, and he told me he had some talk with the Adjutant last evening, who said he would give up his right to the piece of gi-ound near the fish market for fifty doflars per month, or rather he would rent it to 264 any one to build upon for that sum monthly. Mr. B. thought he might be bought out for about $2,000, but of this he was not certain." Sep. 11. " I requested Mr. B., at his next interview with the Adjutant, to ascertain the exact sum the lot could be had for, when he said, it was useless to go into any negotiation until it was determined on your part to close the bargain, if it could be had at a fair price. So it stood unlil I was stopped in the street by the Secretary of the Cabildo, and asked when the contract could be closed; for he had been asked by some of the Regidores for the expediente, and been told by them that it could not be kept open as it is a great while longer. This I told .to Messrs. Scull & Storey, who came to the conclusion lo make the de mand for the lowest price, (to inquire the lowest price at which the lot could be had from the Adjutant,) not, however, until I had again sounded the depth of the water in front of the lot." Sept. 18. " I sawr Mr. Scull yesterday, who told rae that Mr. B. had inforraed him that the Adjutant vi'ould dispose of the lot at the fish market for $3,000, as his lowest price ; he (the Ad jutant) to obtain the permission for building and discharging - over the wall. Mr. Scull advised rae to go and raeasure the lot, and see if it was sufficiently large for the new house; which I have done to-day. I find it raeasures,'' &c. &c. " When I was measuring the lot, the Coraisario of the Cabildo (of whora I have spoken several times as exerting himself in our behalf) said we ought to be 'expeditious and close the contract ; for he should not be able to keep it open much longer. I told him it was likely it might be ready to be closed in a few days." Oct. 12. " A few days since, I was sent for by Mr. B., when he showed me a rough draft, said it must be dressed by a law yer or some one acquainted with memorials, and then the Adju tant (Don Francisco Seydefl) would present it, and have it carried through the different offices to obtain the permission to build by the fish market. When this is carried through, and the permission obtained, I suppose Mr. Scull will have to pay the money and wait for you to build. Everything else respect ing the contract for the ice Privflege remains as it was, waiting for the decision about the 1st before they will conclude it." [That is to say, the Authorities would not consent to the execu tion of the document securing the Privilege to us until we could show that we had obtained a lot upon which to build the house requisite to the fulfilment of the contract] Oct. 21. " Your letter per brig Alphonso was received on the 15th. / had thought that you would have written something about ihe Privilege, and the lot for a new house ; but you have 265 said nothing to me, only that the assistance I have rendered the concern in ' the security is good, and I am told by Mr. Storey that you have not mentioned anything to him." — " AU the agree ments, as they stand, are merely verbal ; that for the Contract and Privflege not having been carried into effect for want of a lot of land to bufld upon ; that respecting the land, for want of a Ucense to build, and of your consent whether you wifl have it or not" Nov. 6. " I have seen Messrs. Scull & Storey several times since the first instant. Mr. Storey says he has no accounts from you, only the acknowledgment of the reception of some money. He has no instructions respecting a lot of land; and I believe he hardly knows what to do, whether to purchase or not the lot that is now in agitation, even if it should be consented to by the In tendant, which appears rather doubtful at present ; at any rate, it seems as if there will be a rent placed upon it, in addition to the sum to be paid the Adjutant for his reflnquishment." Nov. 7. " There are no accounts from you here since per Dromo, and no one knows what you intend to do. If you intend ed to build this year if the lot was granted, or to purchase a lot in some other place, it would not have been bad to have given orders to buy timber, as this is the time of year when it can be had lower than at any other. The coasters have nothing to do in sugar ; they are employed in bringing timber ; and by purchas ing it from them you get it for half of what you can get it for out of the lumber yards." Nov. 15. " I have not been able to ascertain anything about the memorial for the lot at the fish market until to-day. This morning Mr. B. gave me a note to the Secretary, for him to de- Uver to me the memorial with the Governor's decree, which I was not able to get until the afternoon, when I carried it to Mr. B. The decree was very good as far as it w^ent, giving permis sion to take the lot and build the house ; but not to have a crane to hoist the ice. Mr. B. said another memorial must be made, asking for the crane, and I have got the papers drawn up." Nov. 21. " This morning I was at Mr. B.'s, when he told me that the memorial mentioned in my last had been passed by the Governor to the Intendant, to see if he would consent to the crane for hoisting ice." " If this affair of the lot is not brought to a close soon, it appears to me there wfll be other difficulties in the way ; and it is doubtful whether the Privilege can be ob tained. There have been several vessels from Boston since the Dromo, but no letters from you. I hope you ivere about /send ing your brother again to look into affairs here." Dec. 1. " The PrivUege is not yet closed, because the busi- 34 266 ness of the lot has not been brought to a close ; that is, about the crane. If the Intendant should refuse the crane, and it should be thought advisable to take the lot as it is, with the Gov ernor's decree upon the last memorial but one, the contract for the Privilege can be closed, and the ice will have to be got into the house in the best manner it can until," &c. (tec. " If the contract is not closed during this month, other Comisarios will be appointed at the commencement of the new year; and itis most likely the work wfll have to be commenced anew." Dec. 11. " The Intendant has seen fit to refuse his consent to have a crane built on the wall for the hoisting of ice ; and if he cannot be prevailed upon hereafter to give his consent, the ice wfll have to be brought through the arches in the fish mar ket, which wifl make it a Uttle more difficult than it would be with the crane. " Mr. Scull has concluded to have the contract closed before the present Comisarios go out; and steps are taking to that effect, so that in all next week it is likely it will be closed." Such was the predicament in which it proved to be the sov ereign will and pleasure of Mr. Frederick Tudor to leave Messrs. Scufl, Storey & Co., and myself, for month after month, as the proper state of preparation for his December announcement that he then saw fit not to " accept the contract ! " (G.) First Settlement of Accounts between Mr. Tudor and myself. — A Sample of my Trials, in this respect. Early in 1826, — about two years after my partnership with Mr. Tudor had commenced, — I was invited by a friend in Boston to unite some of my funds with his, in an investment contemplated by him. My affairs being in a state enabling me to accept the offer, I was, on every account, glad to do so. In a very short time, however, I was thrown all aback, by the trans mission of my partner's accounts ; which, if true, proved that I had no money at my disposal, but, on the conti-ary, was stifl deeply in his debt. The nature of this business, and how it ended, is sufficiently explained by the foUowing extracts from my letters to him : April 14, 1826. " Your letters and accounts, per Ninus, were received last evening. In reading No. 8, I observed mention made of my note as not being paid ; and on reference lo your accounts, I found I was indebted to you upwards of $5,000, at 267 which I was much surprised, for I had expected that the note was paid, and if anything, a balance in my favor, in your hands. In looking over your account, I find you have omitted the credfl of one bifl, on William B. Swett & Co., for $1,000, pur chased 29th September, at five per cent I fear there are other mistakes of equal amount ; and there is one small one, where you charge the Havana ice-house wflh insurance of specie, per Laurel and Alert; the insurance of specie, per Laurel, was charged in your account of 1824. " I have said, heretofore, there were mistakes in your accounts of 1824, but you never have seen fit to make any reply. I will now point out some of them." I then wrote lo the Boston friend above referred to : April 24. " When I received your letter of the 16th Febru ary, I did not think but I should be able to furnish you with the sum required, neither did I have any doubt of it when I received that of the 17th uUo., until I read Mr. Tudor's, and looked at his accounts, forwarded at the same time ; when, to my great surprise, I found I was owing him upwards of five thousand dollars. It is what I had never thought ; to the con trary, I supposed he was owing me. I think I can see some errors in his accounts ; and I hope he will find them also, — at least enough of them to wear off the sum he has charged to me. It is flkely I shall be able to send you some ; but I want to hear from Mr. Tudor, in answer to one of my letters of the 14th in stant, in which I have intimated to him his mistake." May 26. [To Mr. Tudor.] " I have looked over our ac counts, from 1st January, 1824, to 15th September, 1825, and I find there was a balance in my favor in your hands, of upwards of $400." " I cannot think you have had anything to do in making out these accounts ; there is too much irregularity in them, to bear your stamp. I have cast the interest of several of the sums, and I find but few of them correct" June 10. [To my friend.] " I enclose you a bill of exchange for $1,500. I would have sent it sooner, but for the disagree ment of accounts between Mr. Tudor and me ; but I find there is no way of getting Mr. Tudor to re-examine his accounts, and so I take this to myself. " If Mr. Tudor looks to his accounts himself, I can hardly see how he can be so much out of the way ; and if he does not, he must have bad advice. " For 1824 and 1825, he has received," (tec, (tec. " And yet he brings me in debt $5,000 ! And when written to on the 268 subject, tefls me to foflow his orders, make remittances, and not pay any regard to my accounts ! " (a) September 21. [To Mr. Tudor.] " I observe what you say about Mr. , and my return to Boston about Christmas." " I cannot think of making another winter passage to Boston ; for I suffered so severely in the last, that it is stfll fresh in my mind. It appears to me, that our accounts can be settled as wefl where we are, as if we were both in one room. I hope to see your accounts stated, in the manner you wrote me some time since." November 8. " You stifl urge my return to Boston this win- er. Unless it is for something of much greater consequence than to settle our accounts, I would not wish to run the risk of going into cold weather, so sudden as it would be to leave here about Christmas for Boston. My health is not very sound now ; or rather, my constitution is not so strong as it was." " I have examined my books and can find nothing that alters my accounts in any way materially from those already forwarded." Nov. 22. " Your No. 32, was received last evening, together with a letter from Mr. Pratt covering a statement of accounts for 1824 and 25, and accompanied with remarks. (a) In one of my partner's letters, received the day before, he had said : Miy 20, 1826. " I hope you will not give me occasion to complain of money ¦ lying unremitted, for any reason which you have given relative to accounts. If it should so happen, that more moneys come into my hands than should come, the moment it becomes effective an interest account is kept, and you derive your part of the advantage; and surely money in this country at six per cent, is far safer than money in Havana at twelve." What Boston merchant can be found to resist the force of this logic ? Was ever reasoning more conclusive and satisfactory — to those who do n't much mind if it so happen that more moneys do come into their hands than should come into their hands 1 Of course, I had to go on remitting; — for, " poor miserable carpenter," as I was, I could not be absolutely certain that the error did not lay in my accounts, in stead of those of my " munificent patron," or his book-keeper's. Tfie result of the matter was, that at the close of the year 1826, he was in my debt to the amount of $5,980 66 ; which, by the close of 1827, had sweUed to $6,840 81. But what of that I Was not money, at six per cent., in Boston, safer than at twelve at Havana 1 And in Boston town, in whose hands could my money be so safe or so profitable, as in those of my patron '! This large balance in his hands, having been brought about solely by oner- remittances, extorted from me, in the way that has been seen, the very least he could, in common justice do, was, when our accounts finally came to be adjusted, to give me credit for the amoimts invested in the bills so remitted by me, as so much money paid to him, or for him, at Havana. Instead of this, the amounts were credited to me, and interest upon them allowed, only from the time the several bills came to maturity, and were paid to him at Boston ! And, to the loss of in terest thus thrown upon me, was added the amount of premiums paid by me, in the purchase of those bills; that also, — with an inconsiderable deduction,— was made my loss. All this, however, was a mere trifle, compared with the loss which would have attended these extorted remittances, had the larger bills proved equally unfortunate with the $400 one. 269 " I -am pleased with this statement, in a great measure ; for it reduces the balance due to you, from $5,000 and odd, to $300 ; yet I consider it incorrect " Mr. P , in his letter, says I have mentioned mistakes in casting interest on cash received by you, and requests me to point them out I did not say there were mistakes in casting in terest on cash received by you, but that there were mistakes in easting interest on several sums ; neither was that intended to con vey an idea that the amount of interest would change materially the face of the accounts ; (as some were too large, and I believe others too small,) but as there were mistakes in one part, it was possible there were others in another part, and the present state ment proves there were ; and yet the present statement is incor rect." " I do not profess to be well skflled in the science of accounts, neither have I consulted with any that does ; but it appears to me that we must, to have our accounts adjusted in a clear and correct manner, make them out separate. It is my opinon that your account with Havana ice-house should," (tec. &c. " I wifl write Mr. to adjust the Smith affair {b) with you ; or you may put it to account of the concern ; more than this, I cannot feel myself justified in doing at this time." Dec. 16. [To my friend.] " When I bought into this estab Ushment, I paid Mr. Tudor $2000, and gave him my note on demand for $4000 more, bearing interest It was understood that ray payments should be made in Boston ; consequently all the products of the establishment, except its disbursements and my personal expenses, were forwarded to Mr. Tudor, as fast as they occurred and opportunities offered. Some time in the sum mer of 1825, Mr. Tudor wrote me, stating that, by an estimate of his, my note would be paid in when all the bills should be cashed that he had received. According to an estimate of mine in Sept 1825, I concluded there was a balance in my favor in Mr. Tudor's hands, and that together with what I then had, the amount would be about Mr. Tudor's share for the year ; leaving for me and the expenses of the establishment, what I should receive from then to the close of the year. At that time bills were selling at five per cent, advance, which was higher than I liked to pay on my account ; and being urged by Mr. Tudor to remit his money as soon as I could, I then concluded to remit all the money there was in my possession, on Mr. Tudor's account, and take raine out of what I should receive, and keep it on hand untfl bills should fall, the fafl of which I concluded would be more than I could obtain at interest providing it could be em- (b) This is the bill of. exchange for $400, mentioned in Appendix (D). 270 ployed. One of the bifls remitted at that time unfortunately has never been paid, and Mr. Tudor says I ought to lose it, if it is finally lost " This I dispute with him, as being unfair, and this is what you are requested to settle wilh him. In one of my late letters I have told him, the most I could do was, to throw the bifls into the concern an(l make it a general loss. Why should I be re sponsible for remitting raoney ? One or two such cases would ruin me. I will further request you, if convenient, to look over Mr. Tudor's accounts with me, if he has not corrected them him self. There are some great mistakes or errors in them. In his accounts at the close of 1825, he brought me in debt $5152.96f ; and after much ado on my part, I received a few weeks since, what Mr. Pratt calls a statement of accounts ; and there, my debt was mollified down to $322.97^ ; there are errors stifl." Dec. 31. [To Mr. Tudor.] " I do not see why we cannot settle and balance our accounts where we are, as well as other people can setfle their accounts in different countries. To the form of Mr. Pratt's last statement I do not particularly object ; yet, I think there is some that ought to be taken off, such as the Smith bifl," (tec. Jan. 31, 1827. " If you will order the accounts to be made out anew from the beginning, and correct the mistakes where they have been found to occur, I have no doubt but they will be satisfactory." Erratum. — Page 74, note ::, for" see a subsequent note (o),"read- preceding note, (o). YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY