'Y&LE«¥JMlIVEI&S2irY«> Gift of Mrs George A.Smith SELECT DISCOURSES: BY JOHN SMITH, LATE FELLOW OF QOEEN'S COLLEGE IN CAMBRIDGE. TO WHICH IS ADDED A SERMON, PREACHED AT THE AUTHOR'S FUNERAL, BT SYMON PATRICK, D.D. THES FELLOW OF THE SAME COLLEGE, AFTERWARDS LORD BISHOP OF ELT : CONTAINING A BRIEF ACCOUNT OF HIS LIFE AND DEATH. THIRD EDITION, CAREFULLY CORRECTED. 'Am^miiii'gTi XaXs/ra/. — Heb. xi. 4. LONDON: PRINTED FOR RIVINGTONS AND COCHRAN, IN THE STRAND. MDCCCXXI. ADVERTISEMENT THIRD EDITION. In offering to the Public a new Edition of the Writings of John Smith, the Publishers think it necessary to state that it is printed from the second edition of 1673, collated with that of 1660, and that no alterations whatever have been made, farther than correcting the typographical errors with which they both abounded, and which were too palpable to be passed over. The Hebrew, Greek, and other quotations, have been examined with care, and, as often as possible, verified. Besides the two editions of the entire work, above-men tioned, an Abridgment, by Lord Hailes, was published in the year 1754, and another, by the Rev. John King, M. A. of Queen's College, Cambridge, in the course of the last year: " But," to use the words of a highly respectable Divine,* in reference to this Work, " in such abridgments the distinctive features of the original author are too commonly lost." — " He that should republish the Volume at large, would perform a great, and, it is hoped, an acceptable service to the religious public." This, and similar suggestions, from different quarters, to- * The Rev. John Jebb, Rector of Abingdon in the Diocese of Cashel Vide Sermons, 8vo. page 91. a b ADVERTISEMENT. gether with the extreme scarcity and exorbitant price * of both the former editions, have induced the Publishers to bring forward the present one. It is hoped, that in the improved form in which these Discourses are now pre sented to the Public, they will meet with that notice and regard, which, in the opinion of many persons, eminent alike for their talents and their piety, they are well entitled to receive. 148, Strand, August 1st, 1821. * The usual prices of the old 4to. editions have been for some years past from eighteen to twenty-four shillings ; and a copy of the second edition brought by public auction in the country a few months since thirty shillings ! MEMOIR OP THE AUTHOR, LORD HAILES. J ohn Smith, the author of the following Discourses, was born in the year 1618, at Achurch, near Oundle, in North amptonshire, where his father possessed a small farm.* On the 5th of April, 1636, he was admitted a scholar of Emanuel College in Cambridge.f It was his peculiar felicity to have for tiRor Dr. Whichcote : | by that excellent person he was directed in his studies, and bounteously maintained. | j In the year 1 640, he took the degree of Bachelor of Arts, and in the year 1644, the degree of Master of Arts. He never obtained a Fellowship in Emanuel College ; for which the following reason may be assigned ; by the statutes of that College, no more than one Fellow can be admitted from any one county ; and William Dilling- hame,J a native of Northamptonshire, had been admitted * Bishop Kennet. — Register and Chronicle, p. 127. — Bishop Patrick's Funeral Sermon. f Ibid. J At that time Fellow of Emanuel College, and afterwards Provost of King's College. || Preface to Smith's Select Discourses, by John Worthington, D. D. p. vi. § Afterwards Doctor of Divinity, and Master of that College. 8 MEMOIR OF THE AUTHOR. a Fellow in the year 1642, at which time Mr. Smith was not, by his standing in the University, capable of a Fellow ship.* He was, however, on the 11th of June, 1644, appointed Fellow of Queen's College in Cambridge, in the room of one of the Fellows whom the Earl of Manchester ejected at that time, by virtue of the Parliamentary ordinance-! In this College he became eminently useful as' a Fellow and a Tutor; after a tedious sickness, supported with exemplary patience, he died on the 7th of August, 1652, and was buried in the chapel of Queen's College. X To that College he bequeathed a valuable collection of books ; on which account he is recorded among its bene factors, and his name, and the donation made by him, are publicly recited at the end of every term. |] He was a person of lively apprehension, solid judgment, and unwearied diligence; by these qualifications he ac quired, at an early age, a knowledge in tjhe sciences, uncommonly extensive. He was read in law and physic, well versed in history, philosophy, and mathematics, and critically skilled in the learned languages.. His abilities as a moralist and a divine, may be discerned from his Select Discourses. . He may ' seem to have overrated the writings of the later Platonists, and to have paid too great regard to their authority : but - he had this fault in common with many of his cotempo- * From the information of the accurate and ingenious Dr. Bircb, Secretary to the Royal Society. f In the place of one Appleby, as Walker conjectures List of Loyal and Episcopal Clergy, p. 157. folio, London, 1714. f Bishop Patrick's Funeral Sermon. || From the information of Dr. Birch. MEMOIR OF THE AUTHOR. raries. The study of Plotinus, and of the other authors of his sect, was then much cultivated at Cambridge. They who knew him, represent him to have been of a j character most amiable. He was a conscientious and dis- / interested man : his notions of virtue were exalted, his j benevolence universal: Christian kindness was the ruling 1 principle of his heart, and the constant and delightful sub ject of his conversation : the zeal of the times in which he lived was unhappily violent, his own temper was passionate; yet he was ever faithful to the great law of love. The perverse and obstinate wickedness of mankind excited in him emotions of sorrow, not of anger. He was communicative of his knowledge to others, and on their account cheerfully permitted the interruption of his own studies. ^, He performed the duties belonging to his office of Tutor with faithful application : he taught equally by precept and example : he had an ease of expression rarely to be found in studious and abstracted persons : he laboured to accom plish his pupils in all human literature ; yet he employed his . most anxious care in leading them in the ways of heavenly. vgsdoE} ;\,for he was, as Bishop Patrick expresses it, " alwlyjandfkithful guardian." Yet did not his learning and superior usefulness swell him with arrogance : his humility was the most conspicu ous of all his virtues. He himself was wont to say, " That learning, when put in opposition to moral accomplish ments, was nothing more than an excellent kind of vanity." As a preacher, he was careful of adapting his discourses to the capacity of his audience : he was zealous for the salvation of souls ; to this great end he purposed to have 10 MEMOIR OF THE AUTHOR. dedicated his future labours : but God was pleased to call him early to the reward of obedience. He was constant in meditation, and serious in prayer : his faith in the great truths of religion was sincere, and productive of good works : in a word, he was a plain- hearted, intelligent, and practical Christian. He composed not only the Select Discourses, but also several Treatises, as well in Latin as in English. Some part of them appear to have been once in the hands of Dr. Worthington.* His mathematical lectures are men- tioned with particular commendation ; the contents of the other Treatises are not known. His Select Discourses were by his executor, Dr. Samuel Cradock, committed to the care of Dr. Worthington, + who, with much industry and labour, prepared them for the press. They were published at London in the year 166j^,; and again in the year 1673. The discourse of Prophecy was translated into Latin by M. Le Clerc, and prefixed to his Commentaries on the Prophets, printed at Amsterdam in the year 1731. The discourse of the Excellency and Nobleness of True Religion was also separately pubhshed at Glasgow in the year 1 745. * Preface, p. xxxi. (None of these have ever been printed.) f Preface, p. i. TO THE PRECEDING MEMOIR THE FOLLOWING TESTIMONIES MAY BE SUBJOINED. " His' Select Discourses, which were College Exercises, and contributed to raise new thoughts and a sublimer style in tbe members of the University, were published by his friend, Dr. Worthington, in April, 1660." Dr. Birch, in his Life of Archbishop Tiltotson, pp. 6, 7' " These are not Sermons, but Treatises; and are less known than they deserve. They show an uncommon reach of understanding and penetration, as well as an immense treasure of learning in their author.1' Mr. Chalmers, in his Biographical Dictionary, Vol. XXVIII. p. 126. " A mind which displays at once such vast intellectual powers, and such exalted spiritual endowments, may well excite our admiration, and leave us at a loss which most to wonder at, — that a man of thirty-five should have made such gigantic strides in literature ; or that, having done so, he should at the same time have made such rapid attainments in the Divine life." Rev. \ToHy Kino, M. A. Preface to his Abridgment of the Select Discourses, pp. xxix, xxx. Our author is mentioned with great respect by Professor Dugald Stewart, in giving some extracts from these Discourses in bis First Dissertation pre fixed to the New Supplement to the Encyclopedia Britannica, pp. 88, 93, 106. In the Quarterly Review, Vol. XVI. p. 527, these Discourses are quoted, and their author is styled " a writer of great erudition and strength of mind." A Life of Mr. Smith is given in the Christian Observer, Vol. III. p. 389, but it is entirely extracted from Bishop Patrick's Funeral Sermon, which will be found at the end of tins Volume, TO THE READER. J. he intendment of this Preface is not to court the reader into an high esteem either of these discourses or their author, the discourses will best speak what they are, and for the author, his own works will praise him ; but only to give a clear and plain account of what concerns this edition, and withal, to observe something concerning the discourses themselves, and the author of them, not unne cessary perhaps for the reader to be acquainted with. The papers now published, I received from the author's executor, Mr. Samuel Cradock, then Fellow of Em manuel College, now Rector of North Cadbury in Somer setshire, whose beneficence to the public in imparting these treasures, I thought worthy to be here, in the first place, gratefully remembered. Having taken a more general view of these, and some other papers, divers of which were loose and scattered, not being written by the author in any book, my first care was to collect such as were homogeneal and related to the same discourse ; as also to observe where any new addi tional matter was to be inserted; for the author, whose mind was a rich and fruitful soil, a bountiful and ever- bubbling fountain, sometimes would superadd upon fur ther thoughts some other considerations to what he had formerly delivered in public ; and this he would do some times after he had gone off from that argument, and TO THE READER. though matter of a different nature had come between. This employment I found at first sufficiently perplexed and toilsome ; but, through more than once reading over the manuscripts, I got through those difficulties, and de spatched that first trouble. And I am well assured that the severed parts, and also the additional considerations, are brought to their due and proper places, where the author himself would have disposed them, if he had tran scribed his papers. And now I found that I stood in need of more hands and eyes than mine own, for the fair transcribing of the papers, (otherwise impossible to be printed) as also for the examining of the material quotations in this volume : and in this labour I had the assistance of ¦some friends, to whom the memory of the author was very precious. As for some short allusions and expressions borrowed out of ancient authors, serving rather for ornament than support of the matter in hand, there seemed to be less need of being solicitous about all of them : but for the other testi monies, which are many and weighty, there were but few (some possibly among such a number of quotations might escape) that were not examined ; and I am sure that this labour was not unnecessary and in vain, how wearisome soever it was, especially where the authors, or the places in the authors, were not mentioned. And then, for the sake of such readers whose education had not acquainted them with some of the languages, wherein many of the testimonies were represented, beino- otherwise men of good accomplishments, and capable to receive the designed benefit of these papers, it seemed expedient to render the Latin, but especially the Hebrew and Greek quotations, into English; except in such places where, the substance and main importance of the quota- 3 TO THE READER. tions being insinuated in the neighbouring words, a trans lation was less needful, for the author seldom translated the Hebrew, and more seldom the Greek, but into Latin ; as considering that he delivered these discourses in the College-Chapel before an auditory not needing any such condescensions as are requisite in the publishing of these papers for the benefit of some readers. To despatch this first part of the Preface, which con cerns the preparations to this edition, I shall add only one thing more ; that whereas the papers now published, espe cially those that contained the six first discourses, were written in the author's own copy, without any distinction or sections, uno tenore et continud serie, as the Jews ob serve of the ancient writing of the law, pioso r*jin r~ninn L"» ins ' The whole law was but as one verse ;' it seemed ex pedient for the reader's accommodation to distinguish them into several discourses or treatises, the titlepage to each discourse giving a general account of the matter contained therein, and the discourses themselves into chapters and sections, except the discourses were short, as two or three of them are, which therefore have the contents set in the beginning, and before the chapters, to give a particular account of the chief matters therein contained ; that so the reader might have a clearer and fuller view, as of the strength and importance, so also of the contexture of . the whole, and the coherence of the several parts of the re spective discourses; which otherwise would not be so easily discerned by every reader, especially where there are some excursions and digressions in any of the treatises, (things- not unusual in the writings or discourses of other men, when the notion does strongly affect and possess their minds, and their fancies are therefore more active and vigorous,) and some such digressions the reader will VI TO THE READER. meet with here more than once ; though even therein he will see that the author did still respicere titulum, and kept the main design always in his eye. Nor does the author in these digressions lead the reader a httle out of the way, only to see " a reed shaken with the wind,"* an ordi nary trifle, some slight and inconsiderable object ; . but for better purposes ; that he might the better present to the perspicacious reader, something which is worthy his ob servation : and therefore these wagixZarixol Xoyoi being usually of such importance, need not be severely censured by rigid methodists, if any such chance to read these treatises. This is a plain account of some instances of the care and labour preparatory to this edition ; of all which I ac counted the author of these discourses to be most worthy : for I considered him as a friend, one whom I knew for many years, not only when he was Fellow of Queen's College, but when a student in Emmanuel College, where his early piety, and the remembering his Creator in those days of his youth, as also his excellent improvements in the choicest parts of learning, endeared him to many, ». particularly to his careful tutor, then Fellow of Emmanuel College, afterwards Provost of King's College, Dr. Which - - cote; to whom, for his directions and encouragements of him in his studies, his seasonable provision for his support and maintenance when he was a young scholar, as also upon other obliging considerations, our author did ever express a great and singular regard. Rut besides, I considered him (which was more) as a true servant and friend of God : and to such a one, and what relates to such, I thought that I owed no less care and diligence. The former title, " a servant of God," - Matt. xi. 7. TO THE READER. Vll is very often in Scripture given to that incomparable person Moses : incomparable for his philosophical ac complishments and knowledge of nature,' as also for his political wisdom, and great abilities in the conduct and managing of affairs; and in speaking excellent sense, strong and clear reason in any business and case that was before him; for " he was mighty in words and in deeds ;"* and of both these kinds of knowledge wherein Moses ex celled, as also in the more recondite and mysterious know ledge of the Egyptians, there are several instances and proofs in the Pentateuch written by him : incomparable as well for the loveliness of his disposition and temper, the in- . ward ornament and beauty of a meek and humble spirit,f as for the extraordinary amiableness of his outward per son ; and incomparable for his unexampled self-denial in the midst of the greatest allurements and most tempting advantages of this world.J And from all these great ac complishments and perfections in Moses, it appears how excellently he was qualified and enabled to answer that title, " the servant of God," more frequently given to him in Scripture than unto any other. The other title, " a friend of God," is given to Abra ham, the father of the faithful, an eminent exemplar of self-resignation and obedience even in trials of the greatest difficulty :§ and it is given to him thrice in Scripture, || and plainly implied in Gen. xviii. 17. " Shall I hide from Abraham," &c. but expressed in the Jerusalem Targum there, ]QrH and in Philo Jud.f rov fiXov /uou. Nor is less insinuated concerning Moses, with whom God is said to * Acts vii. 22. -f- Numb. xii. 3. J Heb. xi. 24, &c. § Rom. iv. Heb. xi. Jam. ii. 21 — 23. 2 Chron. xx. 7. Isa, xii. 8. James ii. Sj. f De Verbis, Resipuit Kue. VIII TO THE READER. have spoken, ,-fD "7N HE) " mouth to mouth,"* and 01D»D D'tiQ ^N " face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend."f And how fitly and properly both these titles were verified concerning our author, who was a faithful, hearty, and in dustrious " servant of God," counting it his duty and dignity, his meat and drink, to do the will of his Master in heaven, and that Ix -tyr)$s and fiir suvoiug, from his very soul, and with good will, (the characters of a good ser vant):) and who was dearly affected towards God, and treated by God as a friend ; may appear from that account i of him represented in the sermon at his funeral. I might easily fill much paper, if I should particularly recount those many excellencies that shined forth in him : but I would study to be short. I might truly say, that he was not only Bixawg, but a.yaS>oc, both a righteous § and truly honest man, and also a good man. He was a follower and imitator of God in purity and holiness, in benignity, goodness, and love ; a love enlarged as God's love is, whose goodness overflows and spreads itself to all, and his tender mercies are over all his works. He was a " lover of our Lord Jesus Christ in sincerity," || a lover of his spirit and of his life, a lover of his excellent laws and rules of holy life, a serious practiser of his sermon in the mount, If the best sermon that ever was preached, and yet hone more generally neglected by those that call themselves Chris tians ; though the observance of it be for the true interest both of men's souls, and of Christian states and common wealths ; and accordingly, as being the surest way to their true settlement and establishment, it is compared to " the * Numb. xii. 8. f Exod. xxxiii. 11. } Eph. vi. 6, 7. 5 Rom. v. 7. || Eph. vi. 21. ^ Matt. v. 6, 7. TO THE READER. building upon a rock."* To be short, he was a Christian not only h oX/y^, but h irt>Xk$, more than a little, even wholly and altogether such : j- a Christian h xguwrw, inward ly:): and in good earnest : religious he was, but without any vaingloriousness and ostentation ; not so much a talking or a disputing, as a living, a doing, and an obeying Christian; one inwardly acquainted with the simphcity and power of godhness, but no admirer ofthe Pharisaic forms and sanc-f timonious shows, though never so goodly and specious, \ which cannot and do not affect the adult and strong Chris tians, though they may and do those that are unskilful and weak. For in this weak and low state of the divided J i churches in Christendom, weak and slight things, espe cially if they make a fair show in the flesh, as the apostle speaks, are most esteemed ; whereas in the mean time " the weightier matters of the law," the most concerning and substantial parts of religion, are passed over and disregard ed by them, as being grievous to them, and no way for their turns, no way for their corrupt interests, fleshly ease, and worldly advantages. But God's thoughts are not as their thoughts : the " circumcision which is of the heart, and in the spirit, is that whose praise is of God, though not of men ;"§ and " that which is highly esteemed amongst men, is abomination in the sight of God." || What I shall further observe concerning the author, is only this, That he was eminent as well in those perfections which have most of divine worth and excellency in them, and rendered him a truly godlike man ; as in those other per fections and accomplishments of the mind, which rendered * Matt. vii. 24.. \ Acts. xxvi. 29. JRom. ii. 29. § Rom. ii. 29. || Luke xvi. 15. X TO THE READER. him a very rational and learned man : and withal, in the midst of all these great accomplishments, as eminent and exemplary in unaffected'" humility and true lowliness of mind. And herein he was hke to Moses, that servant and friend of God, who was most " meek and lewly in heart,"* as our Lord is also said to be, in this, as in all other re spects, greater than Moses who was vir mitissimus, " above all the men which were upon the face of the earth."f And thus he excelled others as much in humility as he did in knowledge, in that thing which, though in a lesser degree in others, is apt to puff up and swell them with pride and pelf-conceit. But Moses was humble, though he was a person of brave parts, pgoraj|ttar; ywaTos, as Josephus speaks of him, and having had the advantages of a most ingenuous education, was admirably accomplished in the choicest parts of knowledge, and " learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians ;"% whereby some of the ancients under stood the mysterious hieroglyphical learning, natural philosophy, music, physic, and mathematics. And for this last, to omit the rest, how excellent this humble man, the author, was therein, did appear to those that heard him read a mathematic lecture in the schools for some years, and may appear hereafter to the reader, if those lectures can be recovered. To conclude, he was a plain hearted friend and Christian, one in whose spirit and mouth there was no guile ; a profitable companion ; nothing of vanity and triflingness in him, as there was nothing of sourness and stoicism. I can very well remember, when I have had private converse with him, how pertinently and freely he would speak to any matter proposed, how weighty, sub stantial, and clearly expressive of his sense his private * Matt. xi. 29. f Numb. xii. 3. $ Acts vii. 21, 22. TO THE READER. Xl discourses would be, and both for matter and language much what of the same importance and value with such exercises as he studied for, and performed in public. I have intimated some things concerning the author; much more might be added : but it needs not, there being, as. I before insinuated, already drawn a fair and lively character of him by a worthy friend of his, in the, sermon preached at his funeral ; for the publishing whereof and annexing it (as now it is) to these discourses, he was im portuned by letters from several hands, and prevailed with : wherein, if some part of the character should seem to have in it any thing of hyperbolism and strangeness, it must seem so to such only who either were unacquainted with him and strangers to his worth, or else find it a hard thing not to be envious, and a difficulty to be humble. But those that had a more inward converse with him, knew him to be one of those " of whom the world was not worthy,"* one of the " excellent ones in the earth ;"f a person truly exemplary in the temper and constitution of his spirit, and in the well-ordered course of his hfe ; a life unius quasi coloris, sine actionum dissensione, as I remember Seneca doth express it somewhere in his epistles, 'all ofone colour, every where like itself:' and eminent in those things that are worthy of praise and imitation. And certainly a just representation of those excellencies that shined in him, as also a faithful celebration of the hke accomplishments in others, is a doing honour to God who is wonderful in his saints, if I may with some apply to this sense that in Psal. lxviii. 35. @uufMt,orbg & 0ii( h rote, btflois aurou, and it may be also of great use to others, .particularly for the awakening and obliging them to an earnest endeavouring after those * Heb. xi. 38. t Psalm xvi. 3. Xll TO THE READER. heights and eminent degrees in grace and virtue and every worthy accomplishment, which by such examples they see to be possible and attainable through the assistances which the divine goodness is ready to afford those souls which " press toward the mark, and reach forth to those things that are before." The hves and examples of men emi nently holy and useful in their generation, such as were Twroi xaXm 'igyuv, are ever to be valued by us as great bless ings and favours from heaven, and to be considered as excellent helps to the advancement of religion in the world : and therefore there being before us these shot's s^u^o/, as St. Basil speaks in his first Epistle, and a little afterwards in the same Epistle, aydX/Aara xivovptm xai t/jwrgaxra, such ' living pictures, moving and active statues,' fair ideas and lively patterns of what is most praiseworthy, lovely, and excellent ; it should be our serious care that we be not, through an unworthy and lazy self-neglect, ingentium exem- plorum parvi imitatores, to use Salvian's expression; it should be our holy ambition to transcribe their virtues and excellencies, xai rb ixehiiiv aya^hv oixelbv TCOiiTo^ai bia, /J,i/J,rj0ii,]g, to make their noblest and best accomplishments our own by a constant endeavour after the greatest resemblance of them, and by being " followers of them, as they were also of Christ," who is the fair and bright exemplar of all purity and hohness, the highest and most absolute pattern of whatsoever is lovely and excellent and makes most for the accomplishing and perfecting of human nature. Having observed some things concerning this edition and the author of these discourses, I proceed now, which was the last thing intended in this Preface, to observe something concerning the several discourses and treatises in this volume. And indeed, some of these observations I ought not in justice to the author to pretermit : and TO THE READER. all of them may be for the benefit of, at least, some readers. The first discourse ' Concerning the true Way or Me thod of attaining to Divine Knowledge, and an increase therein,' was intended by the author as a necessary intro duction to the ensuing treatises; and therefore is the shorter : yet it contains apu^Xarov vow iv bxiyy oyxui, to use Plutarch's expression, excellent sense and solid matter, well beaten and compacted and lying close together in a little room, many very seasonable observations for this age, wherein there is so much of fruitless notionality, so little of the true Christian life and practice. Shorter yet are the two next tracts ' of Superstition and Atheism,' which were also intended by the author to prepare the way for some of the following discourses upon which the author purposed to enlarge his thoughts. Yet as for that tract ' of Superstition,' some things that are but briefly intimated by the author therein, may re ceive a further explication from his other discourses, more especially from the eighth, viz. ' Of the Shortness and Vanity of a Pharisaical Righteousness, or An Account of the false Grounds upon which men are apt vainly to con ceit themselves to be religious.'* And indeed, what the author writes concerning that more refined, that more close and subtile superstition, by which he understands the formal and specious sanctity and vain religion of Pharisaical Christians, who yet would seem to be very abhorrent from superstition, and are apt to call every thing Babylonish and antichristian that is not of theif way, I say what he writes concerning this in both these or any other discourses, he would frequently speak of, and * See page 375. XIV TO THE READER. that with authority and power. For being possessed of the inward life and power of true hohness, he had a very strong and clear sense of what he spake, and therefore a great and just indignation, as against open and gross lrre- ligion, so also against that vainglorious, slight, and empty sanctity of the spiritual Pharisees, who would, as our Saviour speaks of the old Pharisees,* make vOid and very fairly disannul the commandments of God, the weightier things of religion, the indispensable concernments of Christianity ; while, instead of an inward hving righteous ness and entire obedience, they would substitute some ex ternal observances, and a mere outward, lifeless, and slight righteousness, and in the room of the new creature made after God, set up some creature of their own, made after their own image, a self-framed righteousness : they being strict in some things which have a show of wisdom and sanctity, things less necessary and more doubtful, and where the holy Scripture hath not placed the kingdom of God, but in the mean time loose and careless in their plain duty toward God and toward their neighbour, in things holy and divine, unquestionably just and good ; yet to make some compensation for their being deficient in things strictly and necessarily required, and primarily pleasing to God, and to excuse themselves, they would express a more than ordinary diligence and zeal in some easy and little things, as all the most specious observances of formal Christians are, and not worthy to be named with those great instances of " the power of godliness," such as hearty and universal obedience, entire self-resignation, a being crucified to the world, plucking out of the right eye, and cutting off the right hand, mortification of the more dear * Mark vii. TO THE READER. XV and beloved sins, and the closer tendencies and inclina tions to sin and vanity, and the hke; ' This is a short character ofthe Pharisaical and conceited righteousness ; and in our author's plain discovering the thinness and slightness thereof, and free reproving of these false religionists, it appears that the same nobleness of mind and spirit was in him which was also in Christ Jesus, who never expressed himself with so much vehemency and smartness, as when he was to reprove the Pharisees in his days,* those patterns of formal Christians in all ages. For there is nothmg more grievous to the sincerely reli gious soul than affectation and canting in religion, empty, though specious shows of sanctity, great pretendings to spirituality and higher degrees of grace, when to the free- spirited and discerning Christian it clearly appears that such boasters are but low and weak things, " unskilful" and unexperienced " in the word" and way " of righteous ness,"! an& manifestly short of being plain moral men; and that they are sensual, having not the spirit, nor bring ing forth those lovely and well-relished fruits of the Spirit, mentioned Gal. v. 22, 23. but, on the contrary, the cor rupt fruits of the flesh grow out of their hearts, and " the works 6f the flesh" there mentioned are manifested in them: so far are they from being " crucified" and not alive " to the world, and the world to them, "J so far are they from having " crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts,"§ that they do ra, rSjs eagxbg and rd iirl rrjg yrig pgbfth, mind and earnestly affect, savour and relish, the things of the flesh, and of the earth ; || aspiring as much after power and greatness, as self-seeking and self-pleas- * Matt, xxiii. j- Heb. v. 13. f Gal. vi. 14. § Gal. v. 24. || Rom. viii. S— 13. Col. iii. 5— 9. XVI TO THE READER. ing, as great lovers of themselves, loving the world and the things in the world, making haste to be rich, thirsting still after more of this world, pursuing worldly advantages and interests, with as much craft and policy, as much solicitude and eagerness, with as unsatisfied desires, as those do whom they call worldly and carnal. So of old the Gnostics called all others but themselves carnal and animal men ; they only were mivpanxol, others were ^vx'^h and vXixol, as Irenaeus tells us:* whereas in truth none were more sensual, more unspiritual, than they who by their uuevangelical lives were the great spots and blemishes ofthe Christian profession. But to let these alone, and to return to the former, with whom our author had to do in both these treatises, and in the 2d, 3d, and 4th, chapters of his seventh treatise, I shall add this word of faithful admonition ; " Be not de ceived, God is not mocked :"f God will not be put off with empty pretences and Pharisaical appearances, how glorious and precious soever in the eyes of men. God will not be flattered with goodly praises, nor satisfied with words and notions, when the life and practice is a real contradiction to them. God will not be satisfied with a specious " form of godliness," when men under this form are " lovers of themselves, covetous, proud, high-minded, fierce, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God, "J and are manifestly under the power of these and the like spiri tual, if not also fleshly, wickednesses. For the power of sin within can, it seems, easily agree and consist with the form of. godliness without : but two such contrary powers as the power of godliness and the power of sin, two such contrary kingdoms as the kingdom of the spirit and the * Lib. I. f Gal' vi- 7- I 2 Tim. iii. 2—4. . TO THE READER. XVII kingdom of the flesh, which is made up of many petty and lesser principalities, of various lusts and pleasures, warring sometimes amongst themselves, but always con- ', federate in warring against the soul ;* these so contrary powers and kingdoms cannot stand together, nor be esta blished in one soul. Be wise now therefore, and be ye instructed O ye sanctimonious Pharisees, ye blind leaders of the blind, and know the things that belong unto your peace : for the day of the Lord will come that shall burn as an oven, when all those fine coverings, wherewith men thought to hide their ungodlike dispositions, shall be torn from them and cast into the fire; and in this day shall even these " weak and beggarly elements,"f melt with a fervent heat, and for hypocrites, all their paint shall then drop off, and their deformity shall appear : in this day all affected modes of religion shall be rendered despicable, and all disguises and artificial dresses, whereby false Christians thought to hide their crookednesses, shall be plucked off, and all things shall appear as they are. Verily, there is a God that judgeth in the earth : he will judge of men by other measures and rules than they used here, whereby they deceived themselves and others. God is for reality and truth : " He desires truth in the inward I _i.L..i. , - ¦ " — -,. ^*-^^r.^r. ™,_ parts,'-'| his delight is in sincere and single minds. It will then appear that " he that walks uprightly, walks surely ;"§ and that " he that doth the will of God, abideth for ever." || If what the author, out of great charity to the souls of men, has observed concerning these things were seriously considered and laid to heart, Christianity would then re- * Titus iii. 3. f Gal. iv. 9. \ Psal. li. 6. J Prov. x. 9. || 1 John ii. 17. XVUI TO THE READER. cover its reputation, and appeal- in its own primitive lustre and native loveliness, such as shined forth in the lives of those first and best Christians, who were Christians -in good earnest, iv sgyy xai aXrfriiq, and were distinguished from all other men in excelling and outshining them in whatsoever things were " true, venerable, just, pure, love ly, and of good report."* Then would the true power of godliness manifest itself; which signifies infinitely more than a power to dispute with heat and vehemency about some opinions, or to discourse volubly about some matters in religion, and in such forms of words as are taking with the weak and unskilful: more than a power to pray with out a form of words ; for these and the like may be, and frequently are, done by the formal and unspiritual Chris tian : more than a power to deny themselves in some things that are easy to .part with, and do not much cross their inclinations, their self-will, their corrupt designs and interests, nor prejudice their dear and more beloved lusls and pleasures, their profitable and advantageous sins : and more than a power to observe some lesser and easier commands, or to perform an outward obedience arising out of slavish fear, void of inward life and love, and a complacency in the law of God, of which temper our author discourses at large. For concerning such cheap and little strictnesses as these it may be inquired, " What do you more than others ? Do not even Publicans and Pharisees the same?"f rS vegiegbv vontri ; what excellent and extraordinary thing do you ? what hard or difficult thing do you perform, such as may deserve to be thought a worthy instance and real manifestation of the power of godliness ? except such things are to be accounted hard * Phi), iv. 8. f Matt. v. 46, 47. TO THE READER. XIX or extraordinary, which are common to the real and to the formal Christian, and are performable by unregenerate and natural men, and are no peculiar characters of regen eration. No, these . and the like performances by which such religionists would set off themselves, are but poor and inconsiderable things, if compared with the mighty acts and noble achievements of the more excellent, though less ostentatious, Christians, who, through faith in the goodness and power of God, have been " enabled to do. all things through Christ, knowing both how to abound, and how to be abased,"* &c. enabled to overcome the world without them, and the love of the world within them ; enabled to overcome themselves, and for a man " to rule his own spirit" is a greater instance of power and valour than " to take a city,"f as Solomon judgeth ; enabled to resist the powers of darkness, and to quit themselves like men and good soldiers of Jesus Christ, giving many signal overthrows to those lusts that war against their souls, and to the mightiest and strongest of them,- the sons of Anak : and by engaging in the hardest services of this spiritual warfare, wherein the Pharisaical boasters dare not follow them, they show that there is a spirit of power in them, and that they can do more than others. These are some of the exploits of strong and healthful Christians ; and for the encouraging of them in these conflicts, which shall end in glorious conquests and joyous triumphs, the author hath in the tenth and last discourse suggested what is wor thy our consideration. But I must not forget that there remains something to be observed concerning some other treatises : and having been so large in the last observation, which was not unne- * Phil. iv. 12, 13. t Prov- xvil 32> XX TO THE READER. cessary, the world abounding, and ever having abounded, with spiritual Pharisees, I shall be shorter in the rest. And now to proceed to the next, which is ' of Atheism :' This discourse, being but preparatory to the ensuing tracts, is short : yet I would remind the reader, that what is more briefly^handled here, may be supplied and further cleared out of the fifth discourse, viz. ' Of the Existence and Nature of God,' of which, if the former part seem more speculative, subtile, and metaphysical, yet the latter, and greater part, containing several ' Deductions and In ferences from the Consideration of the Divine Nature and Attributes,' is less obscure, and more practical, as it clearly directs us to the best, though not much observed, way of glorifying God, and being made happy and blessed by a participation and resemblance of him ; and as it plainly directs a man to such apprehensions of God as are apt and powerful to beget in him the noblest and dearest love to God, the sweetest dehght, and the most peaceful con fidence in him. One thing more I would observe to the reader concern ing the discourse of Atheism ; and the same I would de sire to be observed also concerning the next, that large treatise ' of the Immortality of the Soul,' especially of the former part thereof; and it is shortly this, that the author in these treatises pursues his discourse with a particular reflection on the dogmas and notions of Epicurus and his followers, especially that great admirer of him, Lucretius, whose principles are here particularly examined and re^ futsd. These were the men whose 'opinions our author had to combat with; he lived not to see Atheism so closely and craftily insinuated, nor did he live to see Sadducism and Epicurism so boldly owned and industriously propa gated, as they have been of late by some, who being TO THE READER. XXI heartily desirous that there were no God, no providence, no reward nor punishment after this life, take upon them to deride the notion of spirit, or incorporeal substance, the existence of separate souls, and the life to come ; and by infusing into men's minds opinions contrary to these fundamental principles of religion, they have done that which manifestly tends to the overthrow of all religion, the destruction of morality and virtuous living, the de bauching of mankind, the consuming and eating out of any good principle left in the conscience, which doth tes tify for God and goodness, and against sin and wickedness, and to the defacing and expunging of the law written in men's hearts ;* and so the holy apostle judges of the Epi curean notions and discourses, a taste of which he gives in that passage, " Let us eat and drink, for to-morrow we die,"f and then there is an end of all, no other life or state, and he expresseth his judgment concerning the evil and dangerousness of these doctrines and their teachers, partly in a verse out of Menander, QSilgovoiv r^n xgriord bpiXiai xaxal, " Evil communications corrupt good manners," and in what he subjoins, ver. 34. besides many other passages in this chapter in opposition to the doctrine ofthe Saddu cees and Epicureans : and to the same purpose he speaks concerning those that denied the doctrine of the resurrec tion or any future state, and the life to come.:): The sum and substance of the apostle's judgment concerning these Epicurean principles is plainly this, that these principles properly and powerfully tend to the corrupting of men's minds and lives, to the advancement of irreligion and im morality in the world ; that they are no benign principles * This was of old confessed, and boasted of by Lucretius more than once in his poems. f 1 Cor. xv. 32. i 2 Tim. ii. 16, 17, 18. XXII TO THE READER. to piety and a good life. It is true, that some of the more wary and considerate modern Epicureans may express some care to live inoffensively, and to keep out of danger, and to maintain a reputation in the world as to their con verse with others, (and herein they mind their worldly interests and the advantages of this present life, the only life which they have in their eye ;) they may also express a care in avoiding what is prejudicial to health and a long life in this world : but all this is short of a true and noble love of goodness; and if in these men there be any appear ance of what is good and praiseworthy, they would have been really better, if they had been of other principles, and had believed in their hearts that there is a providence, a future state, and life to come, and had lived agreeably to the truths of the Christian, philosophy, which do more ennoble, and accomplish, and every way better a man, than the principles of the Epicurean sect. But to return, we have before observed that our author in these two treatises pursued his design in opposition to the master-notions and chief principles of Epicurus and Lucretius of old : I shall only add this, that if any of this sect in our days has done more than revived and repeated those principles, if any such has superadded any thing of any seeming force and moment to the pretensions of the old Epicureans men tioned in these tracts, the reader may find it particularly spoken to, and fully answered, by one whom our author highly esteemed, Mr. Henry More, in his late treatise of the Immortah^pfjhe^Soul, and in another discourse en titled, An Antidote against^Atheism, and in the appendix i thereunto annexed. I pass on to the discourse ' of Prophecy,' which, as it cost the author more pains, I believe, than any of the other, it containing many considerable inquiries in an ar- TO THE READER. XX1U gument not commonly treated of, and more than vulgar observations out of ancient Jewish writers, so did it, to gether with the former part of the next discourse, require more labour to prepare it for the press and the benefit of the reader, than any of the other tracts, by reason of the many quotations, especially the Hebrew ones, to be ex amined : in the perusing of which there would sometimes occur a dubious and dark expression, and then I thought it safest to confer with our Hebrew Professor, Dr. Cud- | worth, for whom the author had always a great affection | and respect. It is true, this elaborate treatise is of a more speculative nature than any of the rest, yet is it also useful, and con tains sundry observations not only of light and knowledge, but also of use and practice. For, besides that in this treatise, several passages of Scripture are illustrated out of Jewish monuments, which is no small instance of its use fulness ; there are two chapters, to name no more, viz. the 4th, and 8th, the longest in this treatise, which more par ticularly relate to practice, and might be, if well consid ered, available to the bettering of some men's manners. The matter of the fourth chapter, treating of ' the Differ ence between the true Prophetical Spirit and Enthusias- tical Impostures,' is seasonably useful, and of no small importance. Not to mention any later experiments and proofs how powerful such enthusiastical impostures have been to disquiet and endanger several parts of Christendom, it appears by good history, and the event is yet apparent, how strangely that poHtieal enthusiast, Mahomet, has be fooled a very great part of the world by his pretensions of being inspired and taught by the divine Spirit whispering in his ear, by his epileptical fits, pretended visions and revela tions. Thus Mahomet's dove hath as wonderfully prevailed XXIV TO THE READER. in the world, as of old the Roman eagles : although yet, which may abate our wondering at this success, this im- posturous and pretendedly-inspired doctrine was not pro pagated and promoted with a dove-like spirit, but with force of arms 5 Mahometanism cut out its way by the sword, the worst instrument for propagating religion ; to say nothing of the advantages it had from its compliance with flesh and blood, and a sensual life, and from the igno rance, rudeness, and barbarism of that people to whom that impure prophet communicated his Alcoran, a people capable of any doctrine, how absurd and irrational soever. Whereas Christianity was at first promoted, and made its way in the world, by methods more innocent and worthy of the doctrine of the great God, and our Saviour Jesus Christ, that true and great Prophet, of whom the voice from heaven was, " Hear ye him:"* after whose revelation of the counsel and will of God to man, there is not to be expected any new, and by him unrevealed doctrine, as pertaining to life and godliness, and necessaryto salvation. Neither is the eighth chapter, treating of ' the Disposi tions preparatory to Prophecy,' without its usefulness; there being an easy appliableness of what is contained therein to such as are pretenders to prophesying, accord ing to the more general importance of that word ; and it may be both a just reproof and a sober advice to those who, being full of themselves, swelled with self-conceit, and puffed up with an opinion of their own knowledge and abilities, which yet is but irn ivn, a windy and vain knowledge,-)- a knowledge falsely so called,^ and being wise and righteous in their own eyes, take upon them to * Matt. xvii. 5. See also Acts iii. 22. Deut. xviii. IS. t Job xv. 2. j 1 Tim. vi. 4. TO THE READER. XXV be most talkative and dogmatical, pert and magisterial, " Desiring to be teachers, although they understand nei ther what they say, nor whereof they affirm ;"* and there fore modesty and sparingness of speech, and swiftness to hear, would better become such than empty confidence and talkativeness, and a pouring out words without know ledge, Xi^suv i&v Koruftbg, vou de eraXayjjJtg' for indeed this is the true account of these men and their performances, the weakness and insignificancy of which, notwithstanding the strong voice and loud noise of the speakers, are easily discerned by those who in understanding are men, and have put away childish things.f What I would further intimate concerning this treatise of Prophecy, is briefly this, that though it be one of the largest treatises in this volume, yet there are some parts and passages in it which I think the author would have more enlarged and filled up, had he not hastened to that which, according to the method designed by him, he calls The Third Great Principle of Rehgion. But of this I have given an account in an Advertisement at the end of this treatise, % as also of the adjoining next to it. The discourse ' Of the Legal and the Evangelical Right eousness,' &c. which discourse is as much practical as the former was speculative. Nor was the composure of that treatise more painful to the author, than the elaborating of this, at least the former half of this, wherein the author has traversed loca nullius ante trita solo the more unknown records and monuments of Jewish authors, for the better stating the Jewish notion of ' the Righteous ness of the Law ;' the clearing of which, in chap. 2. and 3. as also the settling the difference between ' That * 1 Tim. i. 7. f I Cor. xiii. 11. { See page 302. XXVI TO THE READER. Righteousness which is of the Law, and that which is of Faith, between the Old and the New Covenant,' and the ' Account of the Nature of Justification and Divine Ac ceptance,' &c. are all of them of no small use and conse quence, but, together with the Appendix to this tract, made up of certain brief but comprehensive observations, they offer to the reader what is not unworthy of his serious con sideration. Ofthe eighth discourse, showing ' the Vanity of a Phari saical Righteousness,' or godhness falsely so called, I have spoken before. The next discourse, largely treating of the ' Excellency and Nobleness of True Religion and Holiness,' shows the author's mind to have been not slightly tinctured and washed over with religion, but rather to have been double- dyed, thoroughly imbued, and coloured with that generosum honestwm, as the Satyrist not unfitly styles it, incoc- tum generoso pectus honesto. But the author's life and actions spake no less ; and indeed there is no language so fully expressive of a man as the language of his deeds. ' Thpse that were thoroughly acquainted with him, knew well, that as there was in him* 3*7 nm as it was said of Solomon, a largeness and vastness of heart and under standing, so there was also in him-)- PITH? TO"! ' a free, ingenuous, noble spirit,' most abhorrent of what was sordid and unworthy; and this irviZ;j.a qywovixbv, as the LXX translate that Hebrew, is the genuine product pf religion in that soul where it is suffered to rule, and, as St. James speaks of patience, " to have her perfect work."J The style in this tract may seem more raised and sublime than in the * 1 K'lgs iv. 29. f Psal. li. 12. J James i. 4. TO THE READER. XXVII other, which might be perhaps from the nature and quality of the subject matter, apt to heighten expressions ; but yet in this, as in the other tracts, it is free from the vanity of affectation, which a mind truly ennobled by rehgion cannot stoop to, as counting it a pedantic business, and a certain argument of a poorness and weakness of spirit in either the writer or speaker. But if in this tract the style seem more magnificent, yet in the tenth and last discourse, viz. ' Of a Christian's Con flicts and Conquests,' it is most familiar. The matter of it is very useful and practical : for as it more fully and clearly acquaints a Christian with the more dangerous and unseen methods of Satan's activity, concerning which the notions and conceptions of many men are discovered here to be very short and imperfect; so it also acquaints him with such principles as are available to beget in him the greatest courage, spirit, and resolution against the day of battle, chasing away all lazy faintheartedness and despair of victory. This for the matter. The style is, as I said, most familiar. This discourse was dehvered in public at Huntingdon, where one of Queen's College is every year, on March 25th, to preach a sermon against witchcraft, diabohcal contracts, &c. I shall only add this, that when he preached in lesser country auditories, particularly at Achurch, near Oundle in Northamptonshire, the place of his nativity, as it was his care to preach upon arguments of most practical concernment, so was it also his desire and endeavour to accommodate his expressions to ordinary vulgar capacities ; being studious to be understood, and not to be ignorantly wondered at by amusing the people either with high unnecessary speculations, or with hard words and vain ostentations of scholastic learning, the low d XXVIII TO THE READER. design of some, that by such arts would gain a poor respect to themselves, for such, and no better, is all that stupid respect which is not founded upon knowledge and judg ment: he was studious, I say, there to speak untornen oixodopfi* edification, and everym Xoyov what was significant and easy to be understood,* as the apostle doth phrase it, and to express his mind in a way suitable to the apprehen sions of popular auditories. And as for the discourses now published, they also were delivered (being College ex ercises) in a way not less suitable to that auditory : and therefore it may not be thought strange, if sometimes they seem for matter and style more remote from vulgar capa cities. Yet even in these discourses, what is most practical, is more easily intelligible by every honest-hearted Chris tian. And indeed, that the whole might be made more familiar and easy, and more accommodate to the use of any such, I thought it would be very expedient to cast the discourses into chapters, and, before every chapter, to pro pose to the reader's view the full scope, sense, and strength ofthe principal matters contained therein: and I could wilhngly have spared such a labour, the greater, when busied about the notions and conceptions of another, and not our own, if I had not conceived it to be greatly help ful and beneficial to some readers : besides another advan tage to them hereby, viz. That they may the more easily find out and select any such particular matters in these discourses, as they shall think most fit or desirable for their perusal. Thus have I given the reader some account of what seemed fit to be observed concerning these ten discourses, which now present themselves to his free and candid judg- * 1 Cor. xiv. 3, 9. 3 TO THE READER. XXIX ment. And now, if in the reading of these tracts, enriched with arguments of great variety, there should occur any passage wherem either he or I may Wixuh it need not be a matter of wonder ; for what book, besides that book of books, the Bible, has not something in it that speaks the author man ? It would not have displeased our author in his lifetime to have been thought less than infallible. He was not tplXavrog, he was no fond self-admirer, nor was he desirous that others should have his person, his opinion and judgment, in admiration : he was far from the humour of magisterial dictating to others, not ambitious " to be called of men, Rabbi, Rabbi,"* as were and are the old and the modern Pharisees ; nor of the number of those who are inwardly transported and tickled, when others ap plaud their judgment, and receive their dictates with the greatest veneration and respect; but very peevish and sour, disturbed and out of order, when any shall express themselves dissatisfied and otherwise minded, or go about modestly to discover their mistakes. No, he was truly qiiXaXrfirig, a lover of truth, and of peace and charity. He loved an ingenuous and sober freedom of spirit, the gene rous Berean-hke temper and practice, agreeable to the apostle's prudent and faithful advice, of " proving, all things, and holding fast that which is good."f But to re turn, it is possible that some passages in these tracts which seem dubious, may, upon a patient considering of them, if the reader be unprejudiced, and one of a clear mind and heart, gain his assent ; and what upon the first reading seems obscure and less grateful, may, upon another view, and further thoughts, clear up, and be thought worthy of all acceptation. It is not with the fair representations and • Matt, xxiii. 7. t 1 Thess. v. 21. XXX TO THE READER. pictures of the mind as with other pictures ; these of the mind show best the nearer they are viewed, and the longer the intellectual eye dwells upon them. There is only one thing more which I ought not to for get to remind the reader of, and it is shortly this, that he would please to remember that the" tracts now published are posthumous works : and then affording that charity, candour, and fair respect, which is commonly allowed to such works of worthy men, I doubt not but he will judge them too good to have been buried in obscurity ; although it is likely, if the author himself had revised them hi his lifetime with an intent to present them to public view, they would have received from his happy hand some further polishing and enlargements. He could have easily obliged the world with other discourses of as valuable import ance, if he had hved, and been so minded. But it pleased the only wise God, in whose hand our breath is, to call for him home to the spirits of just men made perfect, after he had lent him to this unworthy world for about five and thirty years. A short life his was, if we measure it by so many years ; but if we consider the great ends of life and being in the world, which he fulfilled in his generation, his great accomplishments qualifying him for eminent service, and accompanied with as great a readiness to approve him- N self a good and faithful servant to his gracious Lord and Master in heaven, his life was not to be accounted short, but long; and we may justly say of him what is said by the author of the Book of Wisdom concerning Enoch, that great exemplar of hohness, and the shortest lived of the patriarchs before the flood, for he lived but three hundred and sixty-five years, as many years as there are days in one year, TiXuafttlg h lXiyii> faXqgojai xg°v°vs /JMxgovg, " He being consummated in a short time, fulfilled a long TO THE READER. XXXI time."* For, as the same author doth well express it in some preceding verses, " Honourable age is not that which standeth in length of time, nor that which is measured by number of years : but wisdom is the gray hair unto men, and an unspotted life is old age."f Thus much for the papers now published. There are some other pieces of this author's, both English and Latin, which may make another considerable volume, especially if some papers of his, in other hands, can be retrieved. For my particular, I shall wish and endeavour that not the least fragment of his may be concealed, which his friends shall think worthy of publishing : and I think all such fragments being gathered up may fitly be brought together under the title of Miscellanies. If others who have any of his papers shall please to communicate them, I doubt not but that there will be found in some of his friends a readiness to publish them with all due care and faithfulness. Ors if they shall think good to do it themselves, and publish them apart, I would desire and hope that they would be stow that labour and diligence about the preparing them for public view and use, as may testify their respect both to the reader's benefit, and the honour of the author's memory. And now that this volume is finished through the good guidance and assistance of God, the Father of lights and the Father of mercies, whose rich goodness and grace in enabling me both " to will and to do,"J and to continue patiently in so doing, notwithstanding the many tedious difficulties accompanying such kind of labour, I desire humbly to acknowledge ; now that the severed papers are brought together in this collection to their due and proper * Wisd. iv. 13. f Ibid- iv> 8> 9- t Phi1, "' 13, XXXU TO THE READER. places, as it was said of the bones scattered in the valley, that " they came together, bone to his bone,"* what re mains but that the Lord of life, he who " giveth to all things hfe and breath,-)- be with all earnestness and hu - mihty implored, that he would please to put bream into these, otherwise dry, bones, that they may live ; that be sides this paper-life, which is all that man can give to these writings, they may have a living form and vital energy within us; that the practical truths contained in these discourses may not be unto us a dead letter, but spirit and life ? That " he who teacheth us to profit,":): would prosper these papers for the attainment of all those good ends to which they are designed; that it would please the God of all grace to remove all darkness and prejudice from the mind and heart of any reader, and whatsoever would hinder the fair reception of truth ; that the reader may have an inward, practical, .and feeling knowledge of " the doctrine which is according to godliness,"^ and live a life worthy of that knowledge ; is the prayer of His Servant in Christ Jesus, John Worthington. Cambridge, » December 22, 165Q.J * Ezek. xxxvii. 7. f Acts xvii. 25. J Isa. xlviii. 17. § 1 Tim. vi. 3. CONTENTS. DISCOURSE I. . OF THE TRUE WAY OR METHOD OF ATTAINING TO DIVINE KNOWLEDGE. SECT. I. Page. That divine things are to be understood rather by a spiritual sensation ~~ than a verbal description, or mere speculation. Sin and wickedness prejudicial to true knowledge. That purity of heart and life, as also an ingenuous freedom of judgment, are the best grounds and pre parations for the entertainment of truth 3 SECT. II. An objection against the method of knowing laid down in the former section, answered. That men generally, notwithstanding their apos tasy, are furnished with the radical principles of true knowledge. (Men want not so much means of knowing what they ought to do, as | wills to do what they know. Practical knowledge differs from all other knowledge, and excels it 16 SECT. III. Men may be considered in a fourfold capacity in order to the perception of divine things. That the best and most excellent knowledge of divine things belongs only to the true and sober Christian ; and that it is but in its infancy while he is in this earthly body 20 XXXIV CONTENTS. DISCOURSE II. OF SUPERSTITION. Page The true notion of superstition well expressed by Asuri^ai^nvia,, i. e. ' an over-timorous and dreadful apprehension of the Deity.' — A false opin ion of the Deity the true cause and rise of superstition — Superstition is most incident to such as converse not with the goodness of God, or are conscious to themselves of their own unlikeness to him. — Right apprehensions of God" beget in man a nobleness and freedom of soul. — Superstition, though it looks upon God as an angry Deity, yet it counts him easily pleased with flattering worship. — Apprehensions of a Deity and guilt meeting together are apt to excite fear — Hypocrites, to spare their sins, seek out ways to compound with God. — Servile and superstitious fear is increased by ignorance of the certain causes of terrible effects in nature, &c. as also by frightful apparitions of ghosts and spectres.— A further consideration of superstition as a < composition of fear and flattery— A fuller definition of superstition, according to the sense of tbe ancients.— Superstition doth not always appear in the same form, but passes from one form to another, and sometimes shrouds itself under forms seemingly spiritual and more refined 29 DISCOURSE III. OP ATHEISM. That there is n near affinity between atheism and superstition That superstition doth not only prepare the way for atheism, but promotes and strengthens it. — That Epicurism is but atheism under * mask. A confutation of Epicurus' master-notion, together with some other pretences and dogmas of his sect. — The true knowledge of nature is advantageous to religion. — That superstition is more tolerable than atheism. — That atheism is both ignoble and uncomfortable. What low and unworthy notions the Epicureans had concerning man's hap piness : and what trouble they were put to, how to define, and where to place true happiness. — A true belief of a Deity supports the soul with a present tranquillity and future hopes Were it not for a Deity, the world would be unhabitable , 45 CONTENTS. DISCOURSE IV. or THE IMMORTALITY OF THE SOUL. CHAP. I. The first and main principles of religion, viz. I. That God is. 2. That God is a rewarder of them that seek him : wherein is included the great article of the immortality of the soul. These two principles ac knowledged by religious and serious persons in all ages. 3. That God communicates himself to mankind by Christ. The doctrine of the immortality of the soul discoursed of in the first place, and why ? 63 CHAP. II. Some considerations preparatory to the proof of the soul's immortality.... 67 CHAP. III. The first argument for the immortality of the soul. That the soul of man is not corporeal. The gross absurdities upon the supposition that the soul is a complex of fluid atoms, or that it is made up by a fortuitous concourse of atoms : which is Epicurus' notion concerning body. The principles and dogmas of the Epicurian philosophy in opposition to the immaterial and incorporeal nature of the soul, asserted by Lucretius ; but discovered to be false and insufficient. That motion cannot arise from body or matter. Nor can the power of sensation arise from matter : much less can reason. That all human knowledge hath not its rise from sense. The proper function of sense, and that it is never deceived. An addition of three considerations for the enforcing of this first argument, and further clearing the immateriality of the soul. That there is in man a faculty Which 1. Controls sense : and, 2. Collects and unites all the perceptions of our several senses. 3. That memory and prevision are not explicable upon the supposition of matter and motion. 73 CHAP. IV. The second argument for the immortality of the soul. Actions either auto matical or spontaneous. That spontaneous and illicit actions evidence the distinction of the soul from the body. Lucretius' evasion very slight and weak. That the liberty of the will is inconsistent with the Epicurean principles. That the conflict of reason against the sensitive appetite argues a being in us superior to matter 91 e XXXVI CONTENTS. CHAP. V. Page The third argument for the immortality of the soul. That mathematical notions argue the soul to be of a true spiritual and immaterial nature. . . 99 CHAP. VI. The fourth argument for the immortality of tho soul. That those clear and stable ideas of truth which are in man's mind evince an immortal and immaterial substance residing in us, distinct from the body. The soul more knowable than the body. Some passages out of Plotinus and Proclus for the further confirming of this argument 103 CHAP. VII. What it is that, beyond the highest and most subtile speculations whatso ever, does clear and evidence to a good man the immortality of his soul. That true gpodness and virtue begets the most raised sense of this immortality. Plotinus' excellent discourse to this purpose 108 CHAP. VIII. An appendix, containing an inquiry into the sense and opinion of Aris totle concerning the immortality of the soul. That according to him the rational soul is separable from the body and immortal. The true meaning of his intellectus agens aa&patiens 113 CHAP. IX. A main difficulty concerning the immortality of the soul [viz. The strong sympathy of the soul with the body] answered. An answer to another inquiry, viz. Under what account impressions derived from the body do fall in morality 120 DISCOURSE V. 1 OP THE EXISTENCE AND NATURE OF GOD. CHAP. I. That the best way to know God is by an attentive reflexion upon our own souls. God more clearly and lively pictured upon the souls of men, than upon any part of the sensible world 133 1 CONTENTS. XXXVII CHAP. II. Page How the contemplation of our own souls, and a right reflexion upon the operations thereof, may lead us into the knowledge of 1. The divine unity and omniscience, 2. God's omnipotence, 3. The divine love and goodness, 4. God's eternity, 5. His omnipresence, 6. The divine free dom and liberty 137 CHAP. III. How the consideration of those restless motions of our wills after some supreme and infinite good, leads us into the knowledge of a Deity 145 CHAP. IV. deductions and inferences from the consideration of the divine nature and attributes. 1. That all divine productions are the free effluxes of omnipotent love and goodness. The true notion of God's glory what it is. Men very apt to mistake in this point. God needs not the happiness or misery of bis creatures to make himself glorious. God does most glorify himself by communicating himself: we most glorify God when we most partake of him, and resemble him most.... 151 CHAP. V. A SECOND DEDUCTION. 2. That all things are supported and governed by an almighty wisdom and goodness. An answer to an objection made against the divine providence from an unequal distribution of things here below. Such quarrelling with providence ariseth from a pedantic and carnal notion of good and evil 155 CHAP. VI. A THIRD DEDUCTION. 3. That all true happiness consists in a participation of God, arising out of the assimilation and conformity of our souls to him ; and, that the most real misery ariseth out of the apostasy of souls from God. No . enjoyment of God without our being made like to him. The happiness and misery of man defined and stated, with the original and foundation of both 159 XXXVIII CONTENTS. CHAP. VII. A FOURTH DEDUCTION. Page 4. The fourth deduction acquaints us with the true notion of the divine justice, That the proper scope and design of it, is to preserve righteous ness, to. promote and encourage true goodness. That it does not primarily intend punishment, but only takes it up as a mean to prevent transgression. True justice never supplants any that itself may appear gloriousin their ruins. How divine justice is most advanced 163 CHAP. VIII. THE FIFTH AND LAST DEDUCTION. 5. That seeing there is such an intercourse and society, as it were, between God and men, therefore there' is also some law between them, which is the bond of all communion. The primitive rules of God's economy in this world, not the sole results of an absolute will, but the sacred decrees of reason and goodness. God could not design to make us sinful or miserable. Of the law of nature imbosomed in man's soul. How it obliges man to love and obey God, and to express a godlike spirit and life in this world. All souls the offspring of God ; but holy souls manifest themselves to be, and are more peculiarly, the children of God 16fJ CHAP. IX. An appendix concerning the reason of positive laws 170 CHAP. X. The conclusion of this treatise concerning the existence and nature of God, showing how our knowledge of God comes to be so imperfect in this state, while we are here in this terrestrial body. Two ways observed by Plotinus, whereby this body does prejudice the soul in her opera tions. That the better philosophers and more contemplative Jews did not deny the existence of all kind of body in the other state. What meant by Zoroaster's ettiaXm i^u^si,-. What kind of knowledge of God cannot be attained to in this life. What meant by flesh and blood, 1 Cor. xv, 50 , 174 CONTENTS. XXXIX DISCOURSE VI. OF PROPHECY. CHAP. I. Page That prophecy is the way whereby revealed truth is dispensed and con- veyed to us. Man's mind capable of conversing and being acquainted as well with revealed or positive truth, as with natural truth. Truths of natural inscription may be excited in us and cleared to us by means of prophetical influence. That the Scripture frequently accommodates itself to vulgar apprehension, and speaks of things in the greatest way of condescension 181 CHAP. II. That the prophetical spirit did not always manifest itself with the same clearness and evidence. The gradual difference of divine illumination between Moses, the prophets, and the hagiographi. A general survey of the nature of prophecy properly so called. Of the joint impressions and operations of the understanding and fancy in prophecy. Of the four degrees of prophecy. The difference between a vision and a dream 188 CHAP. III. How the prophetical dreams did differ from all other kinds of dreams recorded in Scripture. This further illustrated out of several passages of Philo Judaeus pertinent to this purpose 197 CHAP. IV. A large account of the difference between the true prophetical spirit and >' enthusiastical impostures. That the pseudo-prophetical spirit is seated ) ,.' only in the imaginative powers and faculties inferior to reason. That ' Plato and other wise men had a very low opinion of this spirit, and of the gift of divination, and of consulting the oracles. That the true prophetical spirit seats itself as well in the rational powers as in the sen sitive, and that it never alienates the mind, but informs and enlightens it. This further cleared by several testimonies from Gentile and Chris tian writers of old. An account of those fears and consternations which often seized upon the prophets. How the prophets perceived when the prophetical influx seized upon them. The different evidence and energy of the true and false prophetical spirit, 204 Xl CONTENTS. CHAP. V. Page An inquiry concerning the immediate efficient that represented the pro phetical visions to the fancy of the prophet. That these representations were made in the prophet's fancy by some angel. This cleared by several passages out of the Jewish monuments, and by testimonies of Scripture 226 CHAP. VI. The second inquiry, What the meaning of those actions is that are fre quently attributed to the prophets, whetlier they were real, or only imaginary and scenical. What actions of the prophets were only ima ginary and performed upon the stage of fancy. What we are to think of several actions and res gestce recorded of Hosea, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel, in their prophecies 237 CHAP. VII. Of that degree of divine inspiration properly called Ruach hahkodesh, i. u. the Holy Spirit. The nature of it described out of Jewish antiquities. Wherein this Spiritus Sanctus differed from prophecy strictly so called, and from the spirit of holiness in purified souls. What books of the Old Testament were ascribed by the Jews to Ruach hahkodesh. Of the Urim and Thummim 247 CHAP. VIII. Of the dispositions antecedent and preparatory to prophecy. That the qualifications which did fit a man for the prophetical spirit were such as these, viz. Inward piety, true wisdom, a pacate and serene temper of mind, and a due cheerfulness of spirit ; in opposition to viciousness, mental crazedness and inconsistency, unsubdued passions, black melan choly and dull sadness. This illustrated by several instances in Scrip ture. That music was greatly advantageous to the prophets and holy men of God, &c. What is meant by Saul's evil spirit -. 258 CHAP. IX. Of the sons or disciples of the prophets. An account of several schools of prophetical education, as at Naioth in Rama, at Jerusalem, Jericho, Gilgal, &c. Several passages in the historical books of Scripture perti nent to this argument explained 271 CONTENTS. Xii CHAP. X. Page Of Bath Kol, i. e. Filia Vocis : That it succeeded in the room of pro phecy : That it was by the Jews counted the lowest degree of revelation. What places in the New Testament are to be understood of it. 277 CHAP. XI. Of the highest degree of divine inspiration, viz. the Mosaical. Four dif ferences between the divine revelations made to Moses, and to the rest of the prophets. , How the doctrine of men prophetically inspired is to approve itself by miracles, or by its reasonableness. The sympathy and agreeableness between a holy mind and divine truth 281 CHAP. XII. When the prophetical spirit ceased in the Jewish church, The cessation of prophecy noted as a famous epocha by the Jews. The restoring of the prophetical spirit by Christ Some passages to this purpose in the New Testament explained. When the prophetical spirit ceased in tlie Christian church. That it did not continue long, proved by several testimonies of the ancient writers 287 CHAP. XIII. Some rules and observations concerning prophetical writ in general....... 293 DISCOURSE VII. OF LEGAL AND EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. CHAP. I. The intrdduction, showing what it is to have a right knowledge of divine truth, and what it is that is either available or prejudicial to the true Christian knowledge and life 307 CHAP. II. An inquiry into that Jewish notion of a legal righteousness, which is opposed by St. Paul. That their notion of it was such as this, viz. That the law externally dispensed to them, though it were as a dead xiii CONTENTS. Page letter, merely without them, and conjoined with the power of their own free-will, was sufficient to procure them acceptance with God, and to acquire merit enough to purchase eternal life, perfection and happiness. That this their notion had these two grounds ; First, An opinion of their own self-sufficiency, and that their free-will was so absolute and perfect, as that they needed not that God should do any thing for them, but only furnish them with some laws to exercise this innate power about. That they asserted such a freedom of will as might be to them a foundation of merit 311 CHAP. III. The second ground of the Jewish notion of a legal righteousness, viz. That the law delivered to them on mount Sinai was a sufficient dispen sation from God, and all that needed to be done by him to bring them to perfection and happiness ': and that the scope of their law was no thing but to afford them several ways and means of merit. The opinion of the Jewish writers concerning merit and the reward due to the works of the law. Their distinguishing of men in order to merit and demerit into three sorts, viz. perfectly righteous, perfectly wicked, and a mid dle sort betwixt these. The mercenary and low spirit of the Jewish reUgion. An account of what the Cabalists held in this point of legal righteousness 320 CHAP. IV. The second inquiry concerning the evangelical righteousness, or the righteousness of faith, and the true difference between the law and the gospel, the old and the new covenant, as it is laid down by the apostle Paul. A more general answer to this inquiry, together with a general observation of the apostle's main end in opposing faith to the works of the law, viz. To beat down the Jewish proud conceit of merit. A more particular and distinct answer to the inquiry, viz. That the law, or old covenant, is considered only as an external administration, a dead thing in itself, a dispensation consisting in an outward and written law of precepts -. but the gospel, or new covenant, is an internal thing, a vital form and principle of righteousness in the souls of men, an in ward manifestation of divine life, and a living impression upon the minds and spirits of men. This proved from several testimonies of Scripture , 332 CONTENTS. xliii CHAP. V. Tage Two propositions for the better understanding ofthe doctrine of justifica tion and divine acceptance. 1. Prop. That the divine judgment and estimation of every thing is according to the truth of the thing ; and God's acceptance or disacceptance of things is suitable to his judgment. On what account St. James does attribute a kind of justification to good works. 2. Prop. God's justifying of sinners, in pardoning their sins, carries in it a necessary reference to the sanctifying of their na tures. "This abundantly proved from the nature of the thing 351 CHAP. VI. How the gospel righteousness is conveyed to us by faith, made to appear from these two considerations. 1. The gospel lays a strong foundation of a cheerful dependence upon the grace and love of God, and affiance in it. This confirmed by several gospel expressions containing plainly in them the most strong motives and encouragements to all ingenuous addresses to God, to all cheerful dependence on him, and confident expectation of all assistance from bim. 2. A true evangelical faith is no lazy or languid thing, but an ardent breathing and thirsting after divine grace and righteousness : it looks beyond a mere pardon of sin, and mainly pursues after an inward participation of the divine nature. The mighty power of a living faith in the love and goodness of God, discoursed of throughout the whole chapter 359 CHAP. VII. An appendix to the foregoing discourse ; How the whole business and undertaking of Christ is eminently available both to give full relief and ease to our minds and hearts, and also to encourage us to godliness or a godlike righteousness, briefly represented in sundry particulars 371 DISCOURSE VIII. OF THE SHORTNESS OF A PHARISAICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. CHAP. I. A general account of men's mistakes about religion. Men are nowhere more lazy and sluggish, and more apt to delude themselves, than in matters of religion. The religion of most men is but an image and resemblance of their own fancies. The method propounded for dis- f xliv CONTENTS. coursing upon those words in St. Matthew. 1. To discover some of the mistakes and false notions about religion. 2. To discover the rea son of these mistakes. A brief explication of the words 377 CHAP. II. An account of men's mistakes about religion in four particulars. I. A partial obedience to some particular precepts. The false spirit of reli gion spends itself in some particulars, is confined, is overswayed by some prevailing lust. ' Men of this spirit may, by some book-skill, and a zeal about the externals of religion, lose the sense of their own guiltiness, and of their deficiences in the essentials of godliness, and fancy themselves nearly related to <5od. Where the true spirit of reli gion is, it informs and actuates the whole man, it will not be confined, but will be absolute within us, and not suffer any corrupt interest to grow by it 381 CHAP. III. The second mistake about religion, viz. A mere compliance of the out ward man with the law of God. True religion seats itself in the centre of men's souls, and first brings the inward man into obedience to the law of God : the superficial religion intermeddles chiefly with the cir. cumference and outside of men ; or rests in an outward abstaining from some sins. Of speculative and tbe most close and spiritual wickedness within. How apt men are to sink all religion into opinions and exter nal forms 385 CHAP. IV. The third mistake about religion, viz. A constrained and forced obedience lo God's commandments. The religion of many (some of whom would seem most abhorrent from superstition) is nothing else but superstition properly so called. False religionists, having no inward sense of the divine goodness, cannot truly love God, yet their sour and dreadful apprehensions of God compel them to serve him. A slavish spirit in religion may be very prodigal in such kind of serving God as doth not ' pinch their corruptions ; but in the great and weightier matters of reli gion, in such things as prejudice their beloved lusts, it is very needy and sparing. This servile spirit has low and mean thoughts of God, but a high opinion of its outward services, as conceiting that by such cheap things God is gratified and becomes indebted to it. The different effects of love and slavish fear in the truly, and in the falsely, reb'gious. 390 CONTENTS. XlV CHAP. V. Page The fourth and last mistake about religion, When a mere mechanical and artificial religion is taken for that which is a true impression of hea ven upon the souls of men, and wliich moves like a new nature. How religion is by some made a piece of art, and how there may be specious and plausible imitations of the internals of religion as well as of the externals. The method and power of fancy in contriving such arti ficial imitations. How apt men are in these to deceive both themselves and others. The difference between those that are governed in their religion by fancy, and those that are actuated by the divine Spirit, and in whom religion is a living form. That true religion is no art, but a new nature. Religion discovers itself best in a serene and clear temper of mind, in deep humility, meekness, self-denial, universal love of God and all true goodness 395 DISCOURSE IX. OF THE EXCELLENCY AND NOBLENESS OF TRUE RELIGION. CHAP. I. I. The nobleness of religion in regard of its original and fountain: it comes from heaven and moves towards heaven again. God the first excellency and primitive perfection. All perfections and excellencies in any kind are to be measured by their approach tu, and participation of, the first perfection. Religion the greatest participation of God : none capable of this divine communication but the highest of created beings : and consequently religion is the greatest excellency. A two fold fountain in God whence religion flows, viz. 1. His nature. 2. His will. Of truth, natural and revealed. Of an outward and inward revelation of God's will ; 408 CHAP. II. 2. The nobleness of religion in respect of its nature, briefly discovered in some particulars. How a man actuated by religion, 1. Lives above the world ; 2. Converses with himself, and knows how to love, value, and reverence himself, in the best sense ; 3. Lives above himself, not being content to enjoy himself, except he may enjoy God too, and himself in God. How he denies himself for God. To deny a man's ilvi CONTENTS. Page self, is not to deny right reason, for that were to deny God, instead of denying himself for God. Self-love the only principle that acts wicked men. The happy privileges of a soul united to God 413 CHAP. III. 3. The nobleness of religion in regard of its properties, &c. of which this is one, I. Religion enlarges all the faculties of the soul, and begets a true ingenuity,/liberty, and amplitude, the most free and generous spirit in the minds of good men. The nearer any being comes to God, the more large and free; the further it slides from God, the more straitened. Sin is the sinking of man's soul from God into sensual selfishness. An account when the most generous freedom of the soul is to be taken in its just proportions. How mechanical and formal Christians make an art of religion, set it such bounds as may not ex ceed the scant measure of their principles ; and then fit their own no tions as so many examples to it. A good man finds not his religion without him, but as a living principle within him. God's immutable and eternal goodness the unchangeable rule of his will. Peevish, self- willed, and imperious men, shape out such notions of God as are agree able to this pattern of themselves. The truly religious have better apprehensions of God 442 CHAP. IV. The second property discovering the nobleness of religion, viz. That it restores man to a just power and dominion over himself, enables him to overcome his self-will and passions. Of self-will, and the many evils that flow from it. That religion does nowhere discover its power and prowess so much, as in subduing this dangerous and potent enemy. The highest and noblest victories are those over our self-will and pas sions. Of self-denial, and the having power over our wills ; the hap piness and the privileges of such a state. How that magnanimity and puissance, which religion begets in holy souls, differs from and excels that gallantry and puissance which the great Nimrods of this world boast of. 427 CHAP. V. The third property or effect discovering the nobleness of religion, viz. That it directs and enables a man to propound to himself the best end, viz. Tlie glory of God, and his own becoming like unto God. Low and particular ends and interests both debase and straiten « man's spirit -. the universal, highest, and last end both ennobles and enlarges 1 CONTENTS. Xlvii Page it. A man is such as the end he aims at. The great power the end hath to mould and fashion man into its likeness. Religion obliges a man, not to seek himself, nor to drive a trade for himself; but to seek the glory of God, to live wholly to him ; and guides him steadily and uniformly to the one chief good and last end. Men are prone to flatter themselves with a pretended aiming at the glory of God. A more full and distinct explication of what is meant by a man's directing all his actions to the glory of God. What it is truly and really to glorify God. God's seeking his glory in respect of us is the flowing forth of his goodness upon us : our seeking the glory of God is our endeavour ing to partake more of God, and to resemble him, as much as we can, in true holiness and every divine virtue. That we are not nicely to distinguish between the glory of God and our own salvation. That salvation is nothing else for the main, but a true participation of the divine nature. To love God above ourselves, is not to love him above the salvation of our souls ; but above our particular beings, and above our sinful affections, &c. The difference between things that are good relatively, and those that are good absolutely and essentially : that in our conformity to these, God is most glorified, and we are made most happy, i 434 CHAP. VI. The fourth property or effect discovering the excellency of religion, viz. That it begets the greatest serenity and composedness of mind, and brings the truest contentment, the purest and most satisfying joy and pleasure to every holy soul. God, as being that uniform chief good, and the one last end, does attract and fix the soul. Wicked men dis tracted through a multiplicity of objects and ends. How the restless appetite of our wills after some supreme good leads to the knowledge, as of a Dejty, so of the unity of a Deity. How the joys and delights of good men differ from, and far excel those of the wicked. The con stancy and tranquillity of the spirits of good men in reference to ex ternal troubles. All perturbations of the mind arise from an inward rather than an outward cause. The Stoics' method for attaining kra^a- !-ia, and true rest examined, and the insufficiency of it discovered. A further illustration of what has been said concerning the peaceful and happy state of good men, from the contrary state ofthe wicked 443 CHAP. VII. The fifth property or effect discovering the excellency of religion, viz. That it advanceth the soul to a holy boldness and humble familiarity xlviii CONTENTS. Page with God, and to a comfortable confidence concerning the love of God towards it, and its own salvation. Fearfulness, consternation of mind, and frightful passions are consequent upon sin and guilt. These, to gether with the most dismal deportments of trembling and amazement, are agreeable to the nature of the devil, who delights to be served in this manner by his worshippers. Love, joy, and hope are most agree able to the nature of God, and most pleasing to him. The right apprehensions of God are such as are apt to beget love to God, delight and confidence in him. A true Christian is more for a solid and well- grounded peace than for high raptures and feelings of joy. How a Christian should endeavour the assurance of his salvation. That he should not importunately expect or desire some extraordinary manifes tations of God to him, but rather look after the manifestation of the life of God within him, the foundation or beginning of heaven and salvation in his own soul. That self-resignation, and the subduing of our own wills, are greatly available to obtain assurance. The vanity and absurdity of that opinion, viz. That in a perfect resignation, of our wills to God's will, a man should be content with his own damnation, and to be the subject of eternal wrath inhell, if it should so please God 456 CHAP. VIII. The sixth property or effect discovering the excellency of religion, viz. That it spiritualizes material things, and carries up the souls of good men from sensible and earthly things, to things intellectual and divine. There are lesser and fuller representations of God in the creatures. To converse with God in the creation, and to pass out of the sensible world into the intellectual, is most effectually taught by religion. Wicked men converse not with God as shining out in the creatures ; they converse with them in a sensual and unspiritual manner. Reli gion does spiritualize the creation to good men : it teaches them to look at any perfections or excellencies in themselves and others, not so much as theirs or others, but as so many beams flowing from one and the same fountain of light ; to love them all in God, and God in all ; the universal goodness in a particular being. A good man enjoys and delights in whatsoever good he sees otherwhere, as if it were his own : he does not fondly love and esteem either himself or others. The di vine temper and strain of the ancient philosophy 4g3 CHAP. IX. The seventh and last property or effect discovering the excellency of reli- CONTENTS. Xlix P.ige gion, viz. That it raiseth the minds of good men to a due observance of, and attendance upon, divine providence, and enables them to serve the will of God, and to acquiesce in it. For a man to serve providence and the will of God entirely, to work with God, and to bring himself and all his actions into a compliance with God's will, his ends and de signs, is an argument of the truest nobleness of spirit; it is the most excellent and divine life ; and it is most for man's advantage. How the consideration of divine providence is the way to inward quietness and establishment of spirit. How wicked men carry themselves unbecom ingly through their impatience and fretfulness under the disposals of providence. The beauty and harmony of the various methods of pro vidence. 4g9 CHAP. X. 4. The excellency of religion in regard of its progress, as it is perpetually carrying on the soul towards perfection. Every nature hath its proper centre which it hastens to. Sin and wickedness is within the attractive power of hell, and hastens thither : grace and holiness is within the central force of heaven, and moves thither. It is not the speculation of heaven as a thing to come that satisfies the desires of religious souls, but tbe real possession of it even in this life. Men are apt to seek after assurance of heaven as a thing to come, rather than after heaven itself and the inward possession of it here. How the assurance of heaven rises from the growth of holiness and the powerful progress of religion in our souls. That we are not hastily to believe that we are Christ's, or that Christ is in us. That the works which Christ does in holy souls testify of him, and best evidence Christ's spiritual appearance in them. 474 CHAP. XI. 5. The excellency of religion in regard of its term and end, viz. Perfect blessedness. How unable we are in this state to comprehend and de scribe the full and perfect state of happiness and glory to come. The more godlike a Christian is, the better may he understand that stale. Holiness and happiness not two distinct things, but two several notions of one and the same thing. Heaven cannot so well be defined by any thing without us, as by something within us. The great nearness and . affinity between sin and hell. The conclusion of this treatise, contain ing a serious exhortation to a diligent minding of religion, with a dis covery of tbe vanity of those pretences which keep men off from minding religion 478 CONTENTS. DISCOURSE X. A CHRISTIAN'S CONFLICTS WITH, AND CONQUESTS OVER, SATAN. CHAP. I. Page The introduction, summarily treating of the perpetual enmity between God, the principle of good, and the principle of evil, the devil : as also between whatsoever is from God and that -which is from tbe devil. That wicked men, by destroying what there is from God within them, and devesting themselves of all that which hath any alliance to God or true goodness, and transforming themselves into the diabolical image, fit themselves for correspondence and converse with the devil. The fears and horrors which infest both the apostate spirits and wicked men. The weakness of the devil's kingdom ; Christ's success against it 491 CHAP. II. The first observable, That the devil is continually busy with us. The devil considered under a double notion. 1. As an apostate spirit which fell from God. The great danger of the devil's activity, not only when he presents himself in some corporeal shape, but when he is un seen and appears not- The weakness and folly of those who are afraid of him only when he appears imbodied. That the good Spirit of God is active for the good of souls.' How regardless men are of the gentle motions of the divine spirit ; and how unwatchful and secure under tbe suggestions of tbe evil spirit. How we may discover the devil in his stratagems and under his several disguises and appearances 495 CHAP. III. 2. Of ihe activity of the devil considered as a spirit of apostasy, and as a degenerate nature in men. That the devil is not only the name of one particular thing, but a nature. The difference between the devil and wicked men is rather the difference of a name than of natures. The kingdom and tyranny of the devil and hell is chiefly within, in the qua lities and dispositions of men's minds. Men are apt to quarrel with the devil in the name and notion, and defy him with their tongues, while they entertain him in their hearts, and comply with all that which CONTENTS. li the devil is. The vanity of their pretended love to God, and hatred of the devil. That there is nothing better than God himself, for which we should love him ; and to love him for his own beauty and excellency is the best way of loving him. That there is nothing worse than sin itself, for which we should hate it ; and to hate it for its own deformity is the truest way of hating it. How hell and misery arises from within men. Why wicked men are so insensible of their misery in this life 499 CHAP. IV. The second observable, viz. The warfare of a Christian life. True reli gion consists not in a mere passive capacity and sluggish kind of doing nothing, nor in a melancholy sitting still or slothful waiting, &c. but it consists in inward life and power, vigour and activity. A discovery of the dulness and erroneousness of that hypothesis, vix. That good men are wholly passive and unable at any time to move without some ex ternal impetus, some impression and impulse from without upon them : or, that all motions in religion are from an external principle. Of the quality aud nature of the true spiritual warfare, and of the manner and method of it. That it is transacted upon the inner stage of men's souls, and managed without noise or pompous observation ; and without any hinderance or prejudice to the most peaceful, sedate, and composed temper of a religious soul. This further illustrated from the consider ation of the false and pretended zeal for God and his kingdom against the devil ; which though it be impetuous, and makes a great noise, and a fair show in the world, is yet both impotent and ineffectual 506 CHAP. V. The third observable, viz. , The certainty of success and victory to all those that resist the devil. This grounded upon, 1. The weakness of the devil and sin considered in themselves. 2. God's powerful assisting all faithful Christians in this warfare. The devil may allure and tempt, but cannot prevail, except men consent and yield to his suggestions. The devil's strength lies in men's treachery and falseness to their own souls. Sin is strong, because men oppose it weakly. Tbe error of the Manichees about a principium mali defended by men in their lives and practices. Of God's readiness to assist Christians in their spiritual con flicts ; his compassionate regards and the more special respects of his providence towards them in such occasions. The conclusion, discover ing the evil and horridness of magic, diabolical contracts, &c 512 g DISCOURSES. DISCOURSE CONCERNING THE TRUE WAY OR METHOD OF ATTAINING DIVINE KNOWLEDGE. Tke fear of tke Lord is tke beginning of wisdom: a good understanding kavc all they that do his commandments. Psal. cxi. 10. If any man will do his wilt, ke shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, John vii. 17. n&Is Se \ffTi Swvarflv, vrrtiB-ivra rm rov fft»(/.ctro$ v$ovw, i^of^oiouffB-ui rS K.U{>it ©say Se yvuffiv Xafhiiv rats 'in itvro tov wo&m ayoftivotSt advrocrov-—™ Ta TVS ^oXirtiots \~kiyx1' c^i£irou. vt yvutrts ouv Ik tou *ag- ir&u xa,) tw$ WsAjTs/aj, olx lx, rou Xoyou xm tou avSouj. Clem. Alexandr. Strom. 3. PREFATORY DISCOURSE CONCERNING THE TRUE WAY OR METHOD OF ATTAINING DIVINE KNOWLEDGE. SECTION I. That divine things are to be understood rather by a spiritual sen sation than a verbal description, or mere speculation. Sin and wickedness prejudicial to true knowledge. That purity of heart and life, as also an ingenuous freedom of judgment, are the best grounds and preparations for the entertainment qf truth. J.T hath been long since well observed, that every art and science hath some certain principles upon which the whole frame and body of it must de pend ; and he that will fully acquaint himself with the mysteries thereof, must come furnished with some prcecognita or wgoX^g;?, that I may speak in the language of the Stoics. Were I indeed to de fine divinity, I should rather call it a divine life, than a divine science ; it being something rather to be understood by a^Mtaal_sjensatign, than by any verbal description, as all things of sense and Ufe are best known by sentient and vital faculties; yvuatg iKuorov h' opotbrnros y'mTKi, as the Greek Philosopher 4 THE TRUE WAY OR METHOD hath well observed, every thing is best known by that which bears a just resemblance and analogy with it: and therefore the scripture is wont to set forth a good life as the prolepsis and funda mental principle of divine science ; " Wisdom hath builded her house, and hewn out her seven pil lars :"* but " the fear ofthe Lord is nMn nWN"l the beginning of wisdom,"t the foundation ofthe whole fabric. We shall therefore, as a prolegomenon or preface to what we shall afterward discourse upon the heads of divinity, speak something of this true method qf knowing, which is not so much by no tions as actions ; as religion itself consists not so , much in words as in things. They are not always the best skilled in divinity, that are the most studied in those pandects, into which it is sometimes digested, or that have erected the greatest mono polies of art and science. He that is most prac- i tical in divine things* hath the purest and siri- | cerest knowledge of them, and. not he that is most dogmatical. Divinity indeed is a true efflux from tJie eternal light, which, like the sun-beams, does not only enlighten, but heat and enliven; and therefore our Saviour hath in his beatitudes con nected purity of heart with the beatifical vision. And as the eye cannot behold the sun, qktoufyg prj yivbpivog, X unless it be sunlike, and hath the form and resemblance of the sun drawn in it; so neither can the soul of man behold God, Ssositirjg p?j yivoy&vri, unless it be Godlike, hath God formed in it, and. be made partaker of the divine nature. And the apostle St. Paul, when hewould lay open the right * Prov. ix. 1. f Ver- 10. 1 Plotin. En. 1. 1. 6. OF ATTAINING DIVINE KNOWLEDGE. 5 way of attaining to divine truth, saith, that "know- j ledge puffeth up," but it is " love that edifieth."* [ The knowledge of divinity that appears in systems I and models is but a poor wan light; but the { powerful energy of divine knowledge displays it- I self in purified souls : here we shall find the true j tssdiBv kkrfc'uug, as the ancient philosophy speaks, \ ' the land of truth/ / To seek our divinity merely in books and writ- ' ings, is to seek the living among the dead: we do ' but in vain seek God many times in these, where his truth too often is not so much enshrined as en tombed : ab ; intra te quaere Deum, seek for God within thine own soul ; he is best discerned nosqS Ira/pfi, as Plotinus phraseth it, by an intellectual touch of him: we must "see with our eyes, and hear with our ears, and our hands must handle the u word of life,"t that I may express it in St. John's ( words. "Eo-77 xoti ipvxfis ahSrjslg ng. The soul itself hath its sense, as well as the body : and therefore David, when he would teach us how to know what the divine goodness is, calls not for speculation but sensation, " Taste and see how good the Lord isJ't /That is not the best and truest knowledge of God which is wrought out by the labour and sweat of the brain, but that which is kindled with in us by a heavenly warmth in our hearts. As in the natural body, it is the heart that sends up good blood and warm spirits into the head, where by it is best enabled to perform its several functions ; so that which enables us to know and understand aright in the things of God, must be a living prin ciple of holiness within us. When the tree of\ »i Cor. viii. 1. ¦)• 1 John i. 1 i Psal. xxiv. 8. 6 THE TRUE WAY OR METHOD knowledge is not planted by the tree of life, and sucks not up sap from thence, it may be as well fruitful with evil as with good, and bring forth bitter fruit as well as sweet. If we would indeed have our knowledge thrive and flourish, we must water the tender plants of it with hohness. When Zoro aster's scholars asked him what they should do to get winged souls,' such as might soar aloft in the bright beams of divine truth, he bids them bathe themselves in the waters of life : they asking what they were, he tells them, the four cardinal virtues, which are the four rivers of paradise. It is but a thin airy knowledge that is got by mere specula tion, which is ushered in by syllogisms and de monstrations ; but that which springs forth from true goodness, is ^£/6reg6i> n ratnjg arohi^eag, as Origen speaks, it brings such a divine light into the soul, as is more clear and convincing than any I demonstration. The reason_why, notwithstanding all our acute reasons and subtile disputes, truth ! prevails no more in the world, is, we so often dis- 1 join truth and true goodness, which in themselves | can never be disunited ; they grow both from the | same root, and live in one another. We may, like those in Plato's deep pit with their faces bended downwards, converse with sounds and shadows; but not with the life and substance Of truth, while our souls remain defiled with any- vice or lusts. These are the black. Lethe lake which drench the souls of men : he that wants true virtue, in heaven's logic, " is blind, and cannot see afar off." * Those J filthy mists that arise from impure and terrene | minds, like an atmosphere, perpetually encompass * 2 Peter i. 9. OF ATTAINING DIVINE KNOWLEDGE. 7 them, that they cannot see that sun of divine truth! that shines about them, but never shines into any! unpurged souls ; the darkness comprehends it not, the foolish man understands it not. All the light and knowledge that may seem sometimes to rise up in unhallowed minds, is but like those fuliginous flames that arise up from our culinary fire, that are soon quenched in their own smoke ; or like those foolish fires that fetch their birth from terrene exu dations, that do but hop up and down, and flit to and fro upon the surface of this earth where they were first brought forth ; and serve not so much to enlighten, as to delude us ; nor to direct the wan dering traveller into his way, but to lead him far ther out of it. While we lodge any filthy vice in us, this will be perpetually twisting itself into the thread of our finest spun speculations ; it will be continually climbing up into the to 'Hyepovixdv, the hegemonical powers of the soul, into the bed of reason, and defile it : hke the wanton ivy twisting itself about the oak, it will twine about our judg ments and understandings, till it hath sucked out the life and spirit of them. I cannot think such black oblivion should possess the minds of some, as to make them question that truth which to good men shines as bright as the sun at noon-day, had they not foully defiled their own souls with some hellish vice or other, how fairly soever it may be they may dissemble it. There is a_benumbing_ spirit, a congealing vapour that ariseth from sin and vice, that will stupify the senses of the soul; as the naturalists" say there is from the torpedo, that smites the senses of those that approach to it. This is that venomous solanum, that deadly night- O THE TRUE WAY OR METHOD shade, that drives its cold poison into the under standings of men. Such as men_^mselve^^.^ucJi„3riB. God hinL- self seem to be. It is the maxim of most wicked men, that the Deity is some way or other like themm selves : their souk do more than whisper it, though their Hps speak it not ; and though their tongues be silent, yet their lives cry it upon the house topsy amid in the public streets., That idea which men generally have of God isa nothing else but the pic ture of their own complexion : that archetypal no tion of him which hath the supremacy in their minds, is none else but such a one as hath been shaped out according to some pattern of them selves; though they may so clothe and disguise this idol of their own, when they carry it about in a pompous procession to expose it to the view of the world, that it may seem very beautiful, and in deed any thing else rather than what it is. Most men, though it may be they themselves; take no great notice of it, like that dissembling monk, ali- ter sentire in sckolis, aliter in musceis, are of a differ ent judgment in the schools from what they are in the retirements of their private closets. There is a double head, as well as a double heart. Men's corrupt heart* will not suffer their notions and ccoaceptions of divine things to be cast into that form, that a higher reason, which may sometime work within them, would put them into* I would not be thought all this while to banish the befief of all innate notions of divine truth : but these are toa often smothered, or tainted with a deep dye of men's filthy lusts. It is but lux sepulta in opaei materia, light buried and stifled in some OF ATTAINING DIVINE KNOWLEDGE. 9 dark body, from whence all those coloured, or ra ther discoloured, notions and apprehensions of divine things are begotten. Though these common no tions may be very busy sometimes in the vegetation of divine knowledge ; yet the corrupt vices of men may so clog, disturb, and overrule them, as the naturalists say, this unruly and masterless matter doth the natural forms in the formation of living creatures, that they may produce nothing but mon sters, miserably distorted and misshapen. This kind of science, as Plotinus speaks, tu vKixu irdkhS ffvvowet,, xui slg uut^v ilah^ttfjuir/i, t&og 'in^ov jjXX<£SjeM-o xgdau if :rgo? ro %s5goi<, « accompanying too familiar ly with matter, and receiving and imbibing it into itself, changeth its shape by this incestuous mixr ture.' At best, while any inward lust is harbour ed in the minds of men, it will so weaken them, that they can never bring forth any masculine or generous knowledge ; as JElian observes of the stork, that if the night-owl chanceth to sit upon her eggs, they become presently as it were mm\hia, and all incubation rendered impotent and ineffec tual. Sin and lust are always of a hungry nature, and suck up all those vital affections of men's souls which should feed and nourish their under standings. ; What are all our most sublime speculations of I the Deity, that are not impregnated with true good ness, but insipid things that have no taste nor life j in them, that do but. swell like empty froth in the i s.ouls of men ! They do not feed men's souls, but only puff them up, and fill them with pride, arro gance, contempt, and tyranny towards those that cannot well understand their subtile curiosities : as 10 i THE TRUE WAY OR METHOD those philosophers that Tully complains of in his times, qui disciplinam suam ostentationem scientia;, non legem vital, putabant, which made their know ledge pnly matter of ostentation, to venditate and set off themselves, but never caring to square and govern their lives by it. Such as these do but, spi der-like, take a great deal of pains to spin a worth less web out of their own bowels, which will not keep them warm. These indeed are those silly souls that are " ever learning, but never come to the knowledge of the truth." * They may, with Pharaoh's lean kine, eat up and devour all tongues and sciences, and yet when they have done, still re main lean and ill-favoured as they were at first. Je june and barren speculations may be hovering and fluttering up and down about divinity, but they can not settle or fix themselves upon it : they unfold ; the plicatures of truth's garment, but they cannot behbld~the lovely face of it. There are hidden mysterielTin divine truth, wrapt up one within an other, which cannot be discerned but only by di vine Epoptists. We must not think we have then attained to the right knowledge of truth, when we have broken through the outward shell of words and phrases that house it up ; or when by a logical analysis we have found out the dependencies and coherencies of them one with another; or when, like stout cham pions of it, having well guarded it with the invin cible strength of our demonstration, we dare stand out in the face of the world, and challenge the field of all those that would pretend to be our rivals. * 2 Tim. iii. 7. OF ATTAINING DIVINE KNOWLEDGE. 1 1 We have many grave and reverend idolaters that worship truth only in the image of their own wits ; that could never adore it so much as they may seem to do, were it any thing else but such a form of belief as their own wandering speculations had at last met together in, were it not that they find their own image and superscription upon it. There is a " knowing of the t^uth as it is in Je sus," as it is in a, Christ-like nature, as it is in that sweet, mild, humble, and loving spirit of Jesus, which spreads itself Hke a morning sun upon the souk~oTgood men, full of light and life. It profits little to know Christ himselFafter the flesh; but he gives his spirit to good men, that searcheth the deep things of God. There is an inward beauty, - life, and loveliness in divine truth, which cannot be known but only then when it is digested into life and practice. The Greek philosopher could tell those high soaring Gnostics that thought them selves no less than Jovis alites, that could (as he speaks in the Comedy) uegoZaTeTi/ xai yrspipgomv ro» nktov, and cried out so much /3^S!r? wgos toV Qsov, * look upon God,' that uvtv agedfe Qeog wopa (juovou, 1 without virtue and real goodness, God is but a name,' a dry and empty notion. The profane sort of men, like those old Gentile Greeks, may make many ruptures in the walls of God's temple, and break into the holy ground, but yet may find God no more there than they did. Divine truth is better understood, as it unfolds itself in the purity of men's hearts and lives, than in all those subtile niceties into which curious wits may lay it forth. And therefore our Saviour, who is the great master of it, wbuld not, while he was 12'* . THE TRUE WAY OR METHOD here on earth, draw it Up into any system or body, nor would his disciples after him ; he would not lay it but to us in any canons or articles bf belief, riot being indeed so careful to stock and enrich the world with opinions and notions, as with true piety, and a Godlike pattern of purity, as the best way to thrive in all spiritual understanding* His main I scope was to promote a holy life, as the best jmd most compendious way to a right behef: He hangs alTtrue acquaintance with divinity upon the doing God's will, " If any man will do his will* he shall <. know of the doctrine, whether it be of God." * This is that alone which will make us, as St. Peter tells us, " that we shall not be barren nor Unfruit- *ful in the knowledge of our Lord and Saviour." t There is an inward sweetness and delicibiisness in divine truth, which no sensual mind can taste or relish : this is that •v|/u%i*oV «"^> that natural man that savours not the things of God. Corrupt pas sions and terrene affections are apt of their own nature to disturb all serene thoughts, to precipitate our judgments, and warp our understandings. It was a good maxim of the old Jewish writers, tin W22 s6i avjn ™ 16 unpn < the Holy Spirit dwells not in terrene and earthly passions.' Divinity is not so well perceived by a subtile wit, uczig ulaStriGu *i- "xa^a^hri, ' as by a purified sense,' as Plotinus phraseth it. Neither was the ancient philosophy unacquaint ed with this way and niethod of attaining tb the ( knowledge of divine things; and therefore X Aris totle himself thought a young man unfit to meddle .-<> * John vii. 17. f 2 Pet. i. 8. { Eth. Nicom. 1. 1. OF ATTAINING DIVINE KNOWLEDGE. 13 with the grave precepts of morahty, till the heat {-Aa and violent precipitancy of his youthful affections . $,, were cooled and moderated. And it is observed of Pvjhjjgoras, that he had several ways to tiy the ca>- pacity of his scholars, and to prove the sedateness and moral temper of their minds, before he would entrust them with the sublimer mysteries of his philosophy. The Platonists were herein so wary ahd solicitous, that they thought the minds of men could never be purged enough from those earthly dregs of sense and passion, in which they were so much steeped, before they could be capable of their divine metaphysics : and therefore they so much solicit a yyngifrfjbog uto tou aw^otTog, as they were wont to phrase it, ' a separation from the body,' in all those that would za&agwg siv, we may a little enlarge, and so fit it for an ingenious pursuer after divine truth : * he that will find truth, must seek it with a free judgment,. and a sanctified mind:' he that thus seeks shall fihirpieLsftaTI Kvein truth, and that shall live in him; it shall be like a stream of living waters issuing out of his own soul ; he shall drink of the waters of his own cistern, and be satisfied; he shall every morning find this heavenly manna lying upon the top of his own soul, and be fed with it to eternal life; he will find satisfaction within, feeling himself in conjunction with truth, though all the world should dispute against him. 16 THE TRUE WAY OR METHOD SECTION II. An objection against the method qf knowing laid down in the for mer section, answered^ That men generally, notwithstanding their apostasy, are furnished with the radical principles of true knowledge. Men want not so much means qf knowing what they ought to do, as wills to do what they know. Practical know ledge differs from all other knowledge, and excels it. AND thus I should again leave this argument, but that perhaps we may all this while have seem ed to undermine what we intend to build up. For jf divine truth spring up only from the root of true goodness ; how shall we ever endeavour to be good, before we know what if is to be so? or how shall we convince the gainsaying world of truth, unless we could also inspire virtue into it ? To both which we shaU make this reply ; that , there are some radical principles of knowledge that are so deeply sunk into the souls of men, as that the impression cannot easily be obliterated, though it may be so much darkened. Sensual baseness doth not so grossly suUy and bemire the souls of aU wicked men at first, as to make them with Diagoras to deny the Deity, or with Protagoras to doubt of, or with Diodorus to question the immor tality of rational souls. Neither are the common principles of virtue so pulled up by the roots in all, as to make them so dubious in stating the bounds of virtue and vice as Epicurus was, though he could not but sometimes take notice of them. Neither is the retentive power of truth so weak and loose in all sceptics, as it was in him, who being well scourged in the streets till the blood ran about him, question- OF ATTAINING DIVINE KNOWLEDGE. 17 ed when he came home, whetlier 'he had been beat en or not. Arrianus hath well observed, that the common notions of God and virtue impressed upon the souls of men, are more clear and perspicuous than any else ; and that if they have not more cer tainty, yet have they more evidence, and display themselves with less difficulty to our reflective faculty than any geometrical demonstrations : and these are both available to prescribe out ways of virtue to men's own souls, and to force an acknow ledgment of truth from those that oppose, when they are well guided by a skilful hand. Truth needs not at any time fly from reason, there being an eternal amity between them. They are only some private dogmas, that may well be suspected as spurious and adulterate, that dare not abide the trial thereof. And this reason is not every where so extinguished, as that we may not by that enter into the souls of men. What the magnetical virtue is in these earthly bodies, that reason is in men's minds, which when it is put forth, draws them one to another. Besides in wicked men there are some times distastes of vice, and flashes of love to virtue ; which are the motions which spring from a true inteUect, and the faint strugglings of a higher life within them, which they crucify again by their wicked sensuality. As truth doth not always act in good men, so neither doth sense always act in wicked men: they may sometimes have their lucida intervalla, their sober fits ; and a divine spirit blow ing and breathing upon them, may then blow up some live sparks of true understanding within them ; though, they may soon endeavour to quench them 18 THE TRUE WAY OR METHOD again, and to rake them up in the ashes of their own earthly thoughts. All this, and more that might be said upon this argument, may serve to point out the way of virtue. We want not so much means of knowing what we ought to do, alT ^fffls^to 39jthat which we may know But yet all that knowledge which is sepa- ratecTfrom an inward acquaintance with virtue and goodness, is of a far different nature from that which ariseth out of a true living sense of them, which is the best discerner thereof, and by which alone we know the true perfection, sweetness, energy, and loveliness of them, and all that which is outs dtjtov, outs ygaTToV, that which can no more be known by a naked demonstration, than colours can be perceived of a blind man by any definition or description which he can hear of them. And, further, the clearest and most distinct no tions of truth that shine in the souls ofthe common sort of men, may be extremely clouded, if they be not accompanied with that answerable practice that might preserve their integrity : these tender plants may soon be spoiled by the continual drop pings of our corrupt affections upon them ; they are but of a weak and feminine nature, and so may be sooner deceived by that wily serpent of sensu ality that harbours within us. While the soul is Khrigqg tou aupuTog, ' full of the body,' while we suffer those notions and common principles of religion to lie asleep within us ; that ymtHovgyog huvupig, ' the power of an animal life,' will be apt to incorporate and mingle itself with them ; and that reason that is within us, as Ploti nus hath well expressed it, becomes more and more OF ATTAINING DIVINE KNOWLEDGE. 19 irufiQvrog xaxoug raiig liriyivoftiimtg M&ig, it will be in fected with those evU opinions that arise from our corporeal life. The more deeply our souls dive into our bodies, the more will reason and sensual- 1 ity run one into another, and make up a most] dilute, unsavoury, and muddy kind of knowledge.! We must therefore endeavour more and more to withdraw ourselves from these bodily things, to set our- souls as free as may be from its miserable sla very to this base flesh : we must shut the eyes of sense, and open that brighter eye of our under standings, that other eye of the soul, as the phUo- sopher caUs our inteUectual faculty, r\v sy^i ph irag,, yguvTM hs oktyoi, 'which indeed all have, but fewj make use of it.' • This is the way to see clearly;' the light of the divine world will then begin to! faU upon us, and those sacred sKKa^sig, those j pure coruscations of immortal and ever-Hving truths wiU shine into us, and in God's own light shall we behold him. The fruit of this knowledge wUl be sweet to our taste, and pleasant to our palates, " sweeter than the honey or the honey-comb." * The priests of Mercury, as Plutarch tells us, in the eating of their holy things, were wont to cry out ykvuu n ukifasia, ' sweet is truth.' But how sweet and delicious "that truth is which holy and heaven- born souls feed upon in their mysterious converse with the Deity, who can tell but they that taste it ? When reason once is raised by the mighty force of the divine Spirit into a converse with God, it is turned into sense : that which before was only faith \ weU built upon sure principles, (for such our science 1 • Psal. xix. 10. 20 THE TRUE WAY OR METHOD may be) now becomes vision. We shaU -then con verse with GoSTtu~vu, whereas before we conversed with him only rj? havoia with our discursive faculty, as the Platonists were wont to distinguish. Before we laid hold on him only IJbyu kmobuxTixu, with a struggling, agonistical, and contentious reason, hotly combating, with difficulties and sharp contests of diverse opinions, and labouring in. itself, in its deductions of one thing from another; we shall then fasten our minds upon him \byu KTosvog, the man that looks at himself as being what he is rather by his soul than by his body; that thinks not .fit to view .his own face in any other glass ., but that., of reason and understanding ; that reckons upon his soul as that which was made to rule, his body as that which was born to obey, and like a handmaid perpetuaUy to wait upon his higher and nobler part. And in such a one the communes 22 THE TRUE WAY OR METHOD notitixB, or common principles of virtue and good ness, are more clear and steady. To such a one we may aUow TgamTigav xai l^avsaTsgav hb\av, ' more clear and distinct opinions,' as being already h xad- agffg/, in a method or course of purgation, or at least fit to be initiated into the mysteria minora, the less er mysteries of religion. For though these innate notions of truth may be but poor, empty, and hun gry things of themselves, before they be fed and fiUed with the practice of true virtue ; yet they are capable of being impregnated, and exalted with the rules and precepts of it. And therefore the Stoics supposed on toioutu wgoayixovsiv at qSixcci xai iro~hmxai agsTa), that the doctrine of poHtieal and moral vir tues was fit to be delivered to such as these ; and though they may not be so well prepared for divine virtue, (which is of a higher emanation) yet they are not immature for human, as having the seeds of it already within themselves, which being water ed by answerable practice, may sprout up within them. The third is uvfyuvog jjdr) xtzo£>a%p£vog, he whose soul is already purged by this lower sort of virtue, and so is continuaUy flying off from the body and bodily passion, and returning into himself. Such in St. Peter's language are those " who have es caped the poUutions which are in the world through lust." * To these we may attribute a vb$ri imar^ij, a lower degree of science, their inward sense of vir tue and moral goodness being far transcendent to aU mere speculative opinions of it. But if this know ledge settle here, it may be quickly apt to corrupt. *2Peterii. 20. OF ATTAINING DIVINE KNOWLEDGE. 23 Many of our most refined moralists may be, in a worse sense than Plotinus means, irkrj^'iVTsg rJJ sav- tuv Quest, ' full with their -own pregnancy ;' their souls may too much heave and swell with the sense of their own virtue and knowledge : there may be an ill ferment of self-love lying at the bottom, which may puff it up the more with pride, arro gance, and self-conceit. These forces with which the divine bounty suppHes us to keep a stronger guard against the evil spirit, may be abused by our own rebelHous pride, enticing them from their alle giance to God, to strengthen itself in our souls, and fortify them against heaven : Hke that supercihous Stoic, who, when he thought his mind well armed and appointed with wisdom and virtue, cried out, Sapiens contendet cum ipso Jove de felicitate. They may make an airy heaven of these, and waU it about with their own self-flattery, and then sit in it as gods, as Cosroes the Persian king was sometimes laughed at for enshrining himself in a temple of his own. And therefore if this knowledge be not at tended with humility and a deep sense of self-pen ury and self-emptiness, we may easily fall short of that true knowledge of God, after which we seem to aspire. We may carry such an image and spe cies of ourselves constantly before 'us*, as will make us lose the clear sight of the Divinity, and be too apt to rest in a mere ' logical life,' an expression of Simplicius, without any true participation of the divine life, if we do not (as many do, if not all, who rise no higher) relapse and slide back by vain-glory, popularity, or such like vices, into some mundane and external vanity or other. The fourth is av^uxog SsaigqTixbg, the true meta- 24 THE TRUE WAY OR METHOD physical and contemplative man, dg ttjv sclutov Xoyt- xriv Zfi)rjv u^rsgrgs^a/c, oKnog shai fiovkSTat tw xgitTTOvm, who running and shooting up above his own logi cal or self-rational life, pierceth into the highest life : such a one, who by universal love and holy affection abstracting himself from himself) endea vours the nearest union with the divine essence that may be, x'svtqov xsvTgw cuvaipag, as Plotinus speaks; knitting his own centre, if he have' any, unto the centre of divine being. To such a one the Platonists are wont to attribute Situv wrutrfi(tai* * a true divine wisdom,' powerfully displaying itself h vosga Zpuri in an ' intellectual life,' as they phrase it. Such a knowledge they say is always pregnant with divine virtue, which ariseth out of a happy union of souls with God, and is nothing else but a living imitation of a godlike perfection drawn out by a strong fervent love of it. This divine know ledge xaXoug zut s^asToug toisi, &c. as Plotinus speaks, makes us amorous of divine beauty, beautiful and lovely; and this divine love and purity reciprocally exalts divine knowledge ; both of them growing up together, like that "Egas and ' Avri§a>s that Pausanias sometimes speaks of. Though, by the Platonists* leave, such a life and knowledge as this is, peculi arly belongs to the true and sober Christian, who lives in him who is life itself, and is enlightened by him who is the truth itself, and is made partaker of the divine unction, " and knoweth all things," as St. John speaks.* TJnj_Hfe_is jiptihing else but Gpd^s_own__^athjwitiiin him, and arTinfanMJhrist (OJSSZi!!? *^e expression) formed in his^ouU * 1 John iii. 20. OF ATTAINING DIVINE KNOWLEDGE. 25 who is in a sense kxauyaa^a Trig dbltjg, ' the shining forth of the Father's glory.' But yet we must not mistake ; this knowledge is but here in its infancy ; there is a higher knowledge, or a higher degree of this knowledge, that doth not, that cannot, descend upon us in these earthly habitations. We cannot here see sn^psDja trvvm in speculo lucido ; here we can see but in a glass, and that darkly too. * Our own imaginative powers, which are perpetually at tending the highest acts of our souls, will be breath ing a gross dew upon the pure glass of our under standings, and so sully and besmear it, that we cannot see the image of the Divinity sincerely in it. But yet this knowledge being a true heavenly fire kindled from God's own altar, begets an undaunt ed courage in the souls of good men, and enables them to cast a holy scorn upon the poor petty trash of this life, in comparison with divine things, and to pity those poor brutish Epicureans that have no thing but the mere husks of fleshly pleasure to feed themselves with. This sight of God makes pious souls breathe after that blessed time when mortality shall be swallowed up of life, when they shall no more behold the Divinity through the dark medi ums that eclipse the blessed sight of it. • 1 Cor. xiii. 12. D SHORT DISCOURSE SUPERSTITION. 'Akpotutz; dfiaS-iccg uB-torns xui fttfffiaif&ovia, av Ix-roz f/imv fftfovb&ffriov. Clem. Alex, in Admon. ad Grjec. (H rZv T^afffyioofi-Utov ToXvriXua, *rif&n us 3«ov eb ymrett, u fth fiiro, tov IvSiov (pgovriftetros vrgoffayotTO, }ajpcc yscg xx) SutitfaXieti dtpgovm, -yrupog rj>o>s. E 34 OF SUPERSTITION. the fruit of his body and the firstlings of his flock to expiate the sin of his soul. * But it maybe we may seem all this while to have made too tragical a description of superstition ; and indeed our author, whom we have all this while had recourse to, seems to have set it forth, as anciently painters were wont to do those pieces in which they would demonstrate most their own skiU ; they would not content themselves with the shape bf one body only, but borrowed several parts from se veral bodies as might most fit their design, and fill up the picture of that they desired chiefly to repre^ sent. Superstition, it may be, looks not so foul and deformed in every soul that is dyed with it, as he hath there set it forth, nor doth it every where spread itself alike : this ira6og that shrouds itself under the name of religion will variously discover itself as it is seated in minds of a various temper, and meets with variety of matter to exercise itself about. We shall therefore a Httle further inquire into it, and what the judgments of the soberest men an ciently were of it ; the rather for that a learned au thor of our own, seems unwilling to own that no tion of it which we have hitherto out of Plutarch and others contended for ; whb, though he hath freed it from that glbss which the late ages have put upon it, yet he riiay seem to have too strictly con fined it to a cowardly worship of the ancient Gen tile demons, as if superstition and Polytheism were indeed the same thing, whereas Polytheism or de>- mon-worship is but one branch of it : which was * Micah vi. 7. OF SUPERSTITION. 35 partly observed by the learned Cafaubon in his notes upon that chapter of Theophrastus icigi hsiatiau (jbou'tts, where it is described to be hsihia ergo? ro hai- friviov, which he thus interprets, Theophrastus voce ^m^b»io» et Deos et damones complexus est, et quicquid divinitatis esse particeps malesana putavit antiquitas. And in this sense it was truly observed by Petro- nius Arbiter, Primus in orbe Deos fecit Timor. The whole progeny of the ancient demons, at least in the minds of the vulgar, sprung out of fear, and were supported by it : though notwithstanding, this fear, when in a being void of all true sense of divine goodness, hath not escaped the censure of supersti tion in Varro's judgment, whose maxim it was, as . St. Austin tells us, Deum d religioso vereri, d super- stitioso timeri : which distinction Servius seems to have made use of in his comment upon Virgil, JE- neid. vi. where the poet describing the torments of the wicked in heU, he runs out into an allegorical exposition of aU, it may be too much in favour of Lucretius, whom he there magnifies. His words are these, Ipse etiam Lucretius dicit per eos super quos jamjam casurus imminet lapis, superstitiosos signifi- cari, qui inaniter semper verentur, et de diis et cazlo et locis superioribus male opinantur ; nam religiosi sunt qui per reverentiam timent. But that we may the more fully unfold the nature of this -rdhg, and the effects of it, which are not al ways of one sort, we shall first premise something concerning the rise of it. The common notions of a Deity, strongly rooted 36 OF SUPERSTITION. in men's souls, and meeting with the apprehensions of guiltiness, are very apt to excite this servile fear : and when men love their own filthy lusts, that they may spare them, they are presently apt to contrive some other ways of appeasing the Deity and com pounding with it. Unhallowed minds, that have no inward foundations of true holiness to fix themselves upon, are easily shaken and tossed from all inward peace and tranquillity : and as the thoughts of some supreme power above them seize upon them, so they are struck with tlie lightning thereof into inward affrightments, which are further increased by a vul gar observation of those strange, stupendous, and terrifying effects in nature, whereof they can give no certain reason, as earthquakes, thunderings, and lightnings, blazing comets, and other meteors of a Hke nature, which are apt to terrify those especiaUy who are already unsettled and chased with an in ward sense of guilt, and, as Seneca speaks, inevita- bilem metum, ut supra nos aliquid timeremus incutiunt. Petronius Arbiter hath weU described this business for us, Primus in orbe deos fecit timor, ardua ccelo Fulmina cum caderent, discussaque mcenia flammis, Atque ictus flagraret Athos From hence it was that the libri fulgurales of the Romans, and other such like volumes of supersti tion, sweUed so much, and that the pulvinaria deo rum were so often frequented, as will easily appear to any one a little conversant in Livy, who every where sets forth this devotion so largely, as if he himself had been too passionately in love with it. OF SUPERSTITION. 37 And though as the events in nature began some times to be found out better by a discovery of their immediate natural causes, so some particular pieces of superstitious customs were antiquated and grown out of date, (as is well observed concerning those charms and februations anciently in use upon the appearing of an eclipse, and some others) yet often affrights and horrors were not so easily abated, whUe they were unacquainted with the Deity, and with the other mysterious events in nature, which begot those furies and unlucky goblins, ahaarogag xai ra\a- (Jbvaioug haifjuovag, in the weak minds of men. To all which we may add the frequent spectres and fright ful apparitions of ghosts and mormos : all which extorted such a kind of worship from them as was most correspondent to such causes of it. And those rites and ceremonies which were begotten by super stition, were again the unhappy nurses of it ; such as are well described by Plutarch in his De Defect. Oracul. 'Eogrow xai dvaiai, #Weg jyjJigat uTopg&dsg, xai axu^uicai, \v a7g a^o ike; tmv otifftoatftaviaVf 'ikaS-w avB-is ajffTtg us xgtlj&vov lft,#£ffGvrt$ v a'l- paai, xai rsKeiordrriv ^uaiav xai tsgougyiav raurtjv vopji- Zpvrug ; ' Were it not better for the Gauls and Scy thians, not to have had any notion, fancy, or history of the gods, than to think them such as delighted in the blood of men offered up in sacrifices upon their altars, as reckoning this the most perfect kind of sacrifice and consummate devotion ?' For thus his words are to be translated in reference to those ancient Gauls and Scythians, whom almost aU his tories testify to have been avQgayirodurar which hor rid and monstrous superstition was anciently very 48 OF ATHEISM. frequent among the heathen, and was sharply tax ed by Empedocles of old, Mogpjjv d' aXha.Za.iru. tuty)? p/Xov Vibv dzigag 2pa£«, litity/ftiung jiiya, vqirios. This made Lucretius cry out with so much indig nation, when he took notice of Agamemnon's ^dia bolical devotion in sacrificing his daughter Iphigenia to make expiation at his Trojan expedition, Tantum religio potuit suadere mahrum. And indeed what sober man could brook such an esteem of himself as this blind superstition, which overspread the hea then world, and (I doubt) is not sufficiently rooted out of the Christian, fastened upon God himseU'? which made Plutarch so much in defiance of it cry out, as willing almost to be an atheist as to enter tain the vulgar superstition, • As for me, (saith he,) I had rather men should say that there is no such man, nor ever was, as Plutarch, than to say that he is or was avQgwitog aQ'ehaiog, luperd&o'kog, sti^egsjj srgoj ogyjjv, eici ro7g rvyfluai rifjuu^rixbg, ' an inconstant, fickle man, apt to be angry, and for every trifle re vengeful,' &c. as he goes on farther to express this blasphemy of superstition. But it may not be amiss, to learn from Atheists themselves what was the impulsive cause that mov ed them to banish away all thoughts and sober fear of a Deity, what was the principle upon which this black opinion was buUt, and by which it was sus tained. And this we may have from the confes sions of the Epicureans, who though they seemed to acknowledge a Deity, yet I doubt not but those that search into their writings will soon embrace OF ATHEISM. 49 TuUy's censure of them, Verbis quidem ponunt, re- ipsa tollunt deos. Indeed it was not safe for Epi curus (though he had a good mind to let the world know how Httle he cared for their deities) to pro fess he believed there were none, lest he should have met with the same entertainment for it that Prota goras did at Athens, who for declaring himself doubtful, she ehi, e'ire pn siai dsoi, was himself put to death, and his books burnt in the streets of Athens, uto xqguxa sub voce pr&conis, as Diogenes Laertius and others record : and indeed the world was ne ver so degenerated any where, as to suffer atheism to appear in public view. But that we may return, and take the confessions a Httle of these secret atheists of the Epicurean sect : and of these Tully gives us a large account in his books De Finibus, and other parts of his phi losophy. Torquatus the Epicurean, in his first book De Finibus, liberally spends his breath to cool that too much heat of reHgion, as he thought, in those that could not apprehend God as any other than curiosum et plenum negotii Deum, (as one of that sect doth phrase it, Lib. I. De Nat. Deor.) and so he states this maxim of the religion that then was most in use, Superstitione qui est imbutus, quietus esse nunquam potest. By the way, it may be worth our observing, how this monstrous progeny of men, when they would seem to acknowledge a Deity, could not forget their own beloved image, which was always before their eyes ; and therefore they would have it as careless of any thing but its own pleasure and idle life as they themselves were. So easy is it for all sects, some way or other, to slide into a compliance with the Anthropomorphites, 50 OF ATHEISM. and to bring down the Deity to a conformity to their own image. But we shaU rather choose a little to examine LiicretiuJuin this point, who hath, in the name of aU his sect, largely told us the rise and original of this design. After a short introduction to his fol lowing discourse of nature, he thus begins his pro logue in commendation of Epicurus' exploit, as he fancies it. Humana ante oculos fcedS cum vita jaceret, Id terris oppressa gravi sub religione, Quae caput e coeli regionibus ostendebat Horribili aspectu semper mortalibus instans ; Primum Graius homo mortales tendere contra Est oculos ausus, primusque obsistere contra : Quem nee fama deum, nee f uhuina, nee minitanti Murmure compressit caelum And a little after in a sorry ovation, proudly cries out, Quare religio pedibus subjecta vicissim Obteritur ; nos exaequat victoria ccelo. But to proceed ; our author observing the timorous minds of men to have been struck with this dread ful superstition, from the observation of some stu pendous effects and events (as he pleaseth rather to caU them) in nature; he therefore, following herein the steps of his great master Epicurus, un dertakes so to solve all those knots into which su perstition was tied up, by unfolding the secrets of nature, as that men might find themselves loosened from those scevi domini and crudeles tyranni, as he caUs the vulgar creeds of the Deity. And so be gins with a simple confutation ofthe opinion ofthe OF ATHEISM. 51 creation, which he supposed to contain a sure and sensible demonstration of a Deity, and to have sprung up from an admiring ignorance of natural productions. Quippe ita formido mortales continet omnes, Quod multa in terris fieri cceloque tuentur, Quorum operum causas nulla ratione videre Possunt, ac fieri divino numine rentur; Lib. I. And towards the end of this first book, Primum quod magnis doceo de rebus, et arctis Religionum animos nodis exsolvere pergo. But herein all the Epicureans (who are not the true, but foster-fathers of that natural phUosophy they brag of, and of which indeed Democritus was the first author) do miserably blunder themselves. For though a lawful acquaintance with aU the events and phenomena that show themselves upon this mundane stage, would contribute much to free men's minds from the slavery of dull superstition : yet would it also breed a sober and amiable belief of the Deity, as it did in all the Pythagoreans, Pla tonists, and other sects of phUosophers, if we may believe themselves ; and an ingenuous knowledge hereof would be as fertUe with reHgion, as the ig norance thereof in affrighted and base minds is with superstition. For which purpose I shaU need only to touch upon Epicurus' master-notion, by which he under takes to solve aU difficulties that might hold our thoughts in suspense about a hqpiovgybg, or a creator, which is that plenum (which is all one with corpus) and inane, that this body (which in his philosophy 51 OF ATHEISM. is nothing but an infinity of insensible atoms mov ing to and fro in an empty space) is, together with that space in which it is, sufficient to beget all those phenomena which we see in nature. Which, how ever true it might be, motion being once granted, yet herein Tully hath well stopped the wheel of this over-hasty philosophy, Lib. I. De Finibus. Cum in rerum natura duo sint quxerenda, unum, qua; ma teria sit ex qua qu&que res efficiatur ; alterum, qua? vis sit quce quidque efficiat : de materia disserue- runt Epicurei ; vim et causam efficiendi reliquerunt. Which is as, much as if some conceited piece of sophistry should go about to prove that an automa ton had no dependency upon the skill of an artificer, by descanting upon the several parts of it, without taking notice in the mean while of some external weight or spring that moves it : or, to use his own simUitude, as if one that undertakes to analyze any learned book, should tell us how so many letters meeting together in several combinations, should beget all that sense that is contained therein, with out minding that wit that cast them aU into their se- veral ranks. And this made Aristotle, otherwise not over zealous of religion, soberly to acknowledge some ' first mover,' ro Tgurov xivouv axivqrov. And yet could we allow Epicurus this power of motion to be seated in nature, yet that he might perform the true task of a naturalist, he must also give us an account how such a force and power in nature should subsist : which indeed is easy to do, if we call in Qebv a-xb prryfivrig, God himself as the architect and mover of this divine artifice; but without some infinite power, impossible. And we should further inquire, how. these move- OF ATHEISM. 53 able and rambling atoms come to place themselves so orderly in the universe, and observe that abso lute harmony and decorum in aU their motions, as if they kept time with the musical laws of some al mighty mind that composed all their lessons, and measured out their dances up and down in the uni verse ; and also how it comes to pass, if they be only moved by chance and accident, that such re gular mutations and generations should be begotten by a fortuitous concourse of atoms, as sometimes they speak of, they having no centre to seat them selves about in an infinite vacuity, as Tully argues ; and how these bodies that are once moved by some impulse from their former station, return again, or at least come to stay themselves, and do not rather move perpetuaUy the same way the first impulse and direction carried them ; or why they do not there rest where their motion first began to cease, if they were interrupted by any thing without them : or again, if the proper motion of these atoms be al ways toward some centre, as Epicurus sometimes is pleased to state the business, lineis rectis, as he saith, then how comes there, as Tully replies, to be any generation ? or if there be a motus declinationis joined with this motion of gravity, (which was one of Epicurus' xugiai lb\ai, which he borrowed not from Democritus) then why should not all tend the same way ? and so all those motions, generations, and appearances in nature all vanish, seeing all va riety of motion would be taken away which way soever this unhallowed opinion be stated ?^ Thus we see, though we should aUow Epicurus' principle and fundamental absurdity in the frame of nature, yet it is too airy and weak a thing to sup- 54 OF ATHEISM. port that massy bulk of absurdities which he would bmld upon it. But it was not the lot of any of his stamp to be over wise (however they did boast most in the title of Sophi) as is weU observed of them ; for then they might have been so happy too as to have dispelled these thick and filthy mists of atheism, by those bright beams of truth that shine in the frame of this inferior world, wherein, as St. Paul speaks, the to yvasrov rou §zou is made mani fest. * Atheism most commonly lurks in confinio sciential et ignorantia? ; when the minds of men begin to draw those gross, earthly vapours of sensual and material speculations by dark and cloudy disputes, they are then most in danger of being benighted in them. There is a natural sense of God that lodges in the minds of the lowest and dullest sort of vul gar men, which is always roving after him, catch ing at him, though it cannot lay any sure hold on him ; which works luce a natural instinct antece dent to any mature knowledge, as being indeed the first principle of it : and if I were to speak precise ly in the mode of the Stoics, I would rather call it ogpw vgog rbv Sebv, than with Plutarch Ssou vbriatv. But when contentious disputes, and frothy reason ings, and contemplations informed by fleshly affec tions, conversant only about the outside of nature, begin to rise up in men's souls ; they may then be in some danger of depressing all those inbred no tions of a Deity, and to reason themselves out of their own senses, as the old sceptics did : and there fore it might perhaps be wished, that some men that have not religion, had had more superstition * Rom. i. 19. OF ATHEISM. 55 to accompany them in their passage from ignorance to knowledge. But we have run out too far in this digression: we shall now return, and observe how our former author takes notice of another piece of vulgar su perstition, which he thinks fit to be chased away by atheism, and that is, ' the terrors of the world to come,' which he thus sets upon in his third book, Animi natura videtur Atque animas claranda meis jam versibus esse, Et metus ille foras praeceps Acherontis agendus Funditus, humanam vitam qui turbat ab imo, Omnia suffundens mortis nigrore And afterwards he tells us how this fear of the gods thus proceeding from tlie former causes, and from those spectres and ghastly apparitions with which men were sometimes terrified, begat all those fan tastic rites and ceremonies in use among them, as their temples, sacred lakes and pools, their groves, altars,' images, and other like vanities, as so many idle toys to please these deities with ; and at last concludes himself thus into atheism, as a strong fort to preserve himself from these cruel deities that superstition had made, because he could not find the way to true religion. Nunc quae causa deum per magnas numina gentes Pervulgarit, et ararum compleverit urbes, Suscipiendaque curarit solennia sacra, Quae nunc in magnis florent reb usque locisque; Unde etiam nunc est mortalibus insitus horror Qui delubra deum nova toto suscitat orbi Terrarum, et in festis cogit celebrare diebus ; Non ita difficile est rationem reddere verbis. Lib. V. 56 OF ATHEISM. Thus we see how superstition strengthened the wicked hands of atheism ; so far is a formal and ritual way of religion proceeding from baseness and servility of mind (though backed with never so much rigour and severity) from keeping it out. And I wish some of our opinions in religion in these days may not have the same evil influences as the notorious Gentile superstition of old had, as well for the begetting this brat of atheism, as I doubt it is too manifest they have for some other. Thus we should now leave this argument ; only before we pass from it, we shall observe two things which Plutarch hath suggested to us. The first whereof is, that howsoever superstition be never so unlovely a thing, yet it is more tolerable than atheism, which I shall repeat in his words, As? pose apAXsi rrjg vsgi 'hsuv hbtflg, uawsg oipsug X^f/jtiv^ ctipaigsiv r»jv heiGihaipoviav si hs rouro ahuvarov, (Atj avvexxbirrsiv, \j,r\6\ ru$kouv rqv irisriv ijv ol Kksttrroi icegi §e£v e^outri, * ' We should endeavour to take off superstition from our minds, as a film from our eyes; but if that cannot be, we must not therefore pluck out our eyes, and blind the faith that generaUy we have of the Deity.' Superstition may sometimes keep men from the outward acts of sin, and so their fu ture punishment may have some abatement. Be sides that atheism offers the greatest violence to men's souls that may be, pulling up the notions of a Deity, which have spread their roots quite through all the powers of men's souls. The second is this, ' that atheism itself is a most ignoble and uncomfortable thing,' as Tully hath * Lib. "Or/ ovTt Zfiv Xtfrtt «5swj x«t' 'Evrtxovgov. OF ATHEISM. 5J largely discussed it, and especially Plutarch in the above-named treatise of his, written by way of con futation of Colotes the Epicurean, who wrote a book to prove that a man could not live quietly by foUowing any other sects of phUosophers besides his own ; as if all true good were only conversant ?rsgj yaar'sga, xai roug aKkoug irogoug rqg aagxog ditavrag, ' about the beUy, and all the pores and passages of the body,' and the way to true happiness was - parog qhovaig xaraau%ureiv, as Plutarch hath not more wittily than judiciously replied upon him. What is aU that happiness that ariseth from these bodUy pleasures to any one that hath any high or noble sense within him ? This gross, muddy, and stupid opinion is nothing else but a dehonestamen- tum humani generis, that casts as great a scorn and reproach upon the nature of mankind as may be, and 'sinks it into the deepest abyss of baseness. And certainly, were the highest happiness of man kind such a thing as might be felt by a corporeal touch, were it of so ignoble a birth as to spring out of this earth, and to grow up out of this mire and clay, we might well sit down, and bewaU our un happy fates, that we should rather be born men than brute beasts, which enjoy more, of this world's happiness than we can do, without any sin or guilt. How little of pleasure these short lives taste here, which only lasts so long as the indigency of nature is in supplying, and after that, only axid r/j xai ovag b rjj -buyy, ' a flying shadow, or flitting dream' of that pleasure (which is choked as soon as craving nature is satisfied) remains in the fancy, o7ov vr'sx- H 58 OF ATHEISM. xavpa rm sm^ufjutSv, as Plutarch hath well observed in the same discourse. And therefore Epicurus, seeing how slippery the soul was to all sensual pleasure, which was apt to sHde away perpetuaUy from it, and again how little of it the body was capable of where it had a shorter stay ; he and his followers could not well teU where to place this beggarly guest : and therefore, as Plu tarch speaks, ava/ xai xdru peraigovrsg, ex rou caiparog eig rnv ^vr^v eira icakiv \x raurqg sig sxsivo, ' one whUe they would place it in the body, and then lead it back again into the soul, not knowing where to be stow it.' And Diodorus, and the Cyreniaci, and the Epicureans, as TuUy tells us, who all could fancy nothing but a bodily happiness, yet could not agree whether it should be voluptas, or vacuitas do* loris, or something else ; it being ever found so hard a thing to define, like that base matter of which it is begotten, which, by reason of its penury and scan tiness of being, as phUosophers teU us, doth effugere intellectum, and is nothing else but a shady kind of nothing, something that hath a name, but nothing else. I dare say that all those that have any just esteem of humanity, cannot but with a noble scorn disdain such a base-born happiness as this is, gene rated only out of the slime of this earth : and yet this is all the portion of atheism, which teaches the entertainers qf it to believe themselves nothing else but so many heaps of more refined dust, fortuitously gathered together, which at last must be all blown away again. But a true beHef of a Deity is a sure support to all serious minds, which, besides the future hopes it is pregnant with, entertains them here with tran- OF ATHEISM. 59 quillity and inward serenity. What the Stoic said in his cool and mature thoughts, oux sen Zfiv ev ru xoo~- \ flu xsvu §s£v xai xsvu wgovoiag, ' it is not worth the while to live in a world empty of God and provi dence,' is the sense of all those that know what a Deity means. Indeed it were the greatest unhap- piness that might be, to have been born into such a world, where we should be perpetually tossed up and down- by a rude and blind fortune, and be per petually Hable to all those abuses which the savage lusts and passions of the world would put upon us. It is not possible for any thing well to bear up the spirit of that man that shaU calmly meditate with himself on the true state and condition of this world, should that mind and wisdom be taken away from it which governs every part of it, and over rules all those disorders that at any time begin to break forth in it. Were there not an omniscient skiU to temper, and fitly to rank in their due places all those quarrelsome and extravagant spirits that are in the world, it would soon prove an unhabit able place, and sink under the heavy weight of its own confusion ; which was wittily signified in that fable of Phaeton, who being admitted to drive the chariot of the sun but for one day, by his rude and unskUful guidance of it made it fall down, and burn the world. Remove God and providence out of the world, and then we have nothing to depend upon but chance and fortune, the humours and passions of men ; and he that could then live in it, had need be as blind as these lords would be, that he might not see his own misery always star ing upon him ; and had need be more senseless and stupid, that he might not be affected with 60 OF ATHEISM. it. " The wicked through the pride of his coun tenance wiU not seek after God : God is not in aU his thoughts." *¦ " O Lord, Father and God of my life, give me not a proud look ; but turn away from thy servants a + giant-like mind." t * Fsal. x. 4. f yiym-riSin -^uxm. Sic Edit. Complut. } Ecclus. xxiii. 4. DISCOURSE DEMONSTRATING THE IMMORTALITY OF THE SOUL. Sejfiot y&Q ix yetttis s%of&ivt xai tfc&VTtf Is uvrw PHOCYLIDES. F.vtnZr,? va> Titpvx*/?* ou vroit)ot$ y oudlv xaxov xar0avivv' CCV6J TO TVSVJ40& StCtf&Uu HUT 6V(!CCV0V. EPICHARMUS APUD CLEM. ALEX. STROM. IV. 'O dyvJos ov du a-rittri, xai yivutrxu ^r^iv amUai, ou uvt&yxn auru eXSovtj oixuv, xat tvtXwis ten*, to$ (Atra, Qtuv 'io-oirc. PLOTIN. ENNEAD. LIB. IV. CAP. 45. J Ov fioutercti o xctxo; otSxwrov nvm TJjy \avrov i/'W^jJv. HIEROCT.. IN PYTHAG. AUR. CARM. DISCOURSE IMMORTALITY OF THE SOUL. CHAP. I. The first and main principles of religion, viz. 1. That God is. 2. Thflt God is a rewarder qf them that seek him : wherein is included the great article of tke immortality qf the soul. , These two principles acknowledged by religious and serious persons in all ages. 3. That God communicates himself to' mankind by Christ. The doctrine of the immortality qf the soul discoursed of in the first place, and why ? XXAVING finished our two short discourses con cerning those two anti-deities, viz. superstition and atheism ; we shaU now proceed to discourse more largely concerning the main heads and principles of religion. And here we are to take notice of those two car dinal points which the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews makes the necessary foundations of all reHgion, viz. " That God is, and That he is a re warder of them that seek him." * To which we * Heb. xi. 6. 64 OF THE IMMORTALITY should add, the immortality qf the reasonable soul, but that that may seem included in the former : and indeed we can neither believe any invisible reward of which he there speaks, without an anterior be lief of the soul's immortality ; neither can we en tertain a serious belief of that, but the notions of poena and praimium will naturaUy follow from it ; we never meet with any who were persuaded of the former, that ever doubted of the latter: and therefore the former two have been usually taken alone for the first principles of reHgion, and have been most insisted upon by the Platonists ; and ac cordingly a novel Platonist writing a summary of Plato's divinity, entitles his book, De Deo etlmmor- talitate Anima?. And also the Stoical philosophy re quires a belief of these as the fundamental princi ples of all religion, of the one whereof Epictetus himself assures us, cap. xxxviii. fo§i on ro xugmrarov, &c. ' Know that the main foundation of piety is this, to have o^sag vrok^'? right opinions and ap prehensions of God, viz. That he is, and that he governs all things' xa~hJug xai hixaiag. And the other is sufficiently insinuated in that cardinal distinction of their ra lXpv, ' tlie Eternal Word is the figbt of souls,' which the vulgar Latin referred to* in Psal. rv. 7« Signatum est supra nos lumen vultus tui, Domine, as Aquinas observes. But we shall not search into the fuU nature of the soul, but rather make our in quiry into tke immortality of it, and endeavour to demonstrate that. *^ CHAP. II. Some considerations preparatory to the proof qf the soul's immortality. JdUT before we fall more closely upon this, viz. the demonstrating the soul's immortality, we shall premise three -things. 1. That the immortality qf the soul doth not ab solutely need any demonstration, to clear it, but might be assumed rather as a principle or postulatum, see ing tlie notion of it is apt naturally to insinuate itself into the belief ofthe most vulgar sort of men. Men's understandings commonly lead them as readUy to beHeve that their souls are immortal, as that they Have any existence at aU. And, though they be not aU so wise and logical, as to distinguish aright between their souls and their bodies, or tell what kind of thing that is which they commonly call their soul ; yet they are strongly inclined to believe that some part of them shall survive another, and that that soul, which it may be they conceive by a gross phantasm, shall live, when the other more vi- 68 OF THE IMMORTALITY sible part of them shaH moulder into dust. And therefore all nations have consented in this belief^ which hath almost been as vulgarly received as the beHef of a Deity ; as a diligent converse with his tory wUl assure us, it having been never so much questioned by the idiotical sort of men, as by some unskUful phUosophers, who have had wit and fancy enough to raise doubts, like evU spirits, but not judgment enough to send them down again. This consensus gentium Tully thinks enough to conclude a law and maxim of nature by, which though I should not universally grant, seeing some times error and superstition may strongly plead this argument ; yet I think for those things that are the matter of our first belief, that notion may not be refused. For we cannot easily conceive how any prime notion,: that hath no dependency on any other antecedent to it, should be generally enter tained, did not the common dictate of nature or reason, acting alike in all men, move them to con spire together in the embracing of it, though they knew not one another's minds. And this it may be might first persuade Averroes to think of a com mon intellect, becauij*e of the uniform judgments of men in some things. But indeed in those no tions, which we may call notiones orta?, there a communis notitia is not so free from all suspicion ; which may be cleared by taking an instance from our present argument. The notion of the immor tality of the soul is such a one as is generally owned by aU those that yet are not able to coUect it by a long series and concatenation of sensible observa tions, and, by a logical dependence of one thing upon another, deduce it from sensible experiments ; OF THE SOUL. 69 "a thing that, it may be, was scarce ever done by the wisest phUosophers, but is rather believed with a kind of repugnancy to sense, which shows aU things to be mortal, and which would have been too apt to have deluded the ruder sort of men, did not a more powerful impression upon their souls forcibly urge them to beHeve their own immortality. Though indeed, if the common notions of men were well examined, it may be some common no tion adherent to this of the immortality may be as generaUy received, which yet in itself is false ; and that by reason of a common prejudice which the earthly and sensual part of man wUl equaUy possess all men with, untU they come to be weU acquainted with their own souls ; as namely, a notion of the soul's materiality, and, it may be its traduction too, which seems to be as generally received by the vul gar sort as the former. But the reason of that is evident ; for the souls of men exercising themselves first of aU zivrioii r^bQanx^, as the Greek philoso pher expresseth, merely by a ' progressive kind of motion,' spending themselves about bodily and ma terial acts, and conversing only with sensible things ; they are apt to acquire such deep stamps of material phantasms to themselves, that they cannot imagine their own being to be any other than material and divisible, though of a fine ethereal nature : which kind of conceit, though it may be inconsistent with an immortal and incorruptible nature, yet hath had too much prevalency in phUosophers themselves, their minds not being sufficiently abstracted whUe they have contemplated the highest Being of aU. And some think Aristotle himself cannot be excus ed in this point, who seems to have thought God 70 OF THE IMMORTALITY himself to be nothing else but f*gy« Zciov, as he styles him. But such common notions as these are, aris ing from, the deceptions and haUucinations of sense, ought not to prejudice those which not sense, but some higlier power begets in aU men. And so we have done with that. The second thing I should premise should be in place of a Postulatwm to our following demonstra tions, or rather a caution about them, which is, that, to a right conceiving the force of any such argu ments as may prove the soul's immortality^ there must be an antecedent converse with our own souls. It is no hard matter to convince any one, by clear and evident principles, fetched from his own sense of himself, who hath ever well meditated on the powers and operations of his own soul, that it is immaterial and immortal. But those very arguments that to such will be demonstrative, to others wiH lose something ofthe strength of probabUity : for indeed'it is not possible for us weU to know what our souls are, but only by their xtvfosig xuxkixai, their ' circular and reflex motions,' and converse with themselves, which on ly can steal from them their own secrets. All those discourses which' Have been written of the soul's heraldry, wUl not blazon it so well to us as itself wUl do. When we turn our own eyes in upon it, it wUl soon teU us its own royal pedigree and noble extraction, by those sacred hieroglyphics which it bears upon itself. We shaU endeavour to inter pret and unfold some of them in our foUowing dis course. ii. There is one thing more to be considered, which may serve as a common basis or principle to OF THE SOUL. 71 our following arguments j and it is this hypothesis, that no substantial and indivisible thing ever perisheth. And this Epicurus and all of his sect must needs grant, as indeed they do, and much more than it is lawful to plead for ; and therefore they make this one of the first principles of their atheistical phUosophy, * ex nihilo fieri nil, et in nihilum nil posse reverti.' But we shall here be content with that sober thesis of Plato in his Timaeus, who attributes the perpetuation of all substances to the benignity and liberality of the Creator, whom he therefore brings in thus speaking to the angels, those v'eoi SW, as he calls them, vpsig oux sari a^dvaroi oufis ctkurm, &c. ' you are not of yourselves immortal, nor indis soluble ; but would relapse and slide back from that being which I have given you, should I with draw the influence of my own power from you : but yet you shall hold your immortality by a patent of mere grace from myself.' But to return, Plato held, that the whole world, howsoever it might meet with many periodical mutations, should re main eterhaUy ; which I think our Christian divin ity doth no where deny: and so Plotinus frames this general axiom, obhev ex rod ovrog amXsirui, ' that no substance shall ever perish.' And indeed, if we collate aU our own observations and experience, with such as the history of former times hath de livered to us, we shall not find that ever any sub stance was quite lost ; but though this Proteus-like matter may perpetually change its shape, yet it wUl constantly appear under one form or another, what artsoever we use to destroy it : as it seems to have been set forth in that old gryphe or riddle of the Peripatetic school, Mlia Lcelia Crispis, nee mas, nee 72 OF THE IMMORTALITY fcemina, nee androgyna, nee casta, nee meretrix, nee pudica ; sed omnia, &c. as Fortunius Licetus hath expounded it. Therefore it was never doubted whether ever any piece of substance was lost, tiU of latter times some hot-brained Peripatetics, who could not bring their fiery and subtile fancies to any cool judgment, began rashly to determine that all material forms (as they are pleased to call them) were lost. For, having once jumbled and crowded in a new kind of being, never anciently heard of, between the parts of a contradiction, that is, mat ter and spirit, which they call material forms, be cause they could not well tell whence these new upstarts should arise, nor how to dispose of them when matter began to shift herself into some new garb, they condemned them to utter destruction ; and yet, lest they should seem too rudely to con trol aU sense and reason, they found out this com mon tale which signifieth nothing, that these sub stantial forms were educed ex potentia materia?, whenever matter began to appear in any new dis guise, and afterwards again returned in gremium materia? ; and so they thought them not quite lost. But this curiosity consisting only of words fortui tously packed up together, being too subtile for any sober judgment to lay hold upon, and which they themselves could never yet tell how to define ; we shaU as carelessly lay it aside,, as they boldly obtrude it upon us, and take the common distinc tion of all substantial being for granted, viz. That it is either body, and so divisible, and of three di mensions ; or else it is something which is not pro perly a body or matter, and so hath no such dimen sions as 'that the parts thereof should be crowding OF THE SOUL. 73 for place, and justling one with another, not being all able to couch together, or run one into another : and this is nothing else but what is. commonly call ed spirit. Though yet we will not be too critical in depriving every thing which is not grossly cor poreal of all kind of extension. CHAP. III. The first argument for the immortality qf the soul. That the soul qf man is not corporeal. The gross absurdities upon the suppo sition that the soul is a complex qf fluid atoms, or that it is made up by a fortuitous concourse qf atoms : which is Epicurus' no tion concerning body. The principles and dogmas qf the Epi curean philosophy in opposition to the immaterial and incorporeal nature qf the soul, asserted by Lucretius s but discovered to be false and insufficient. That motion cannot arise from body or matter. Nor can the power qf sensation arise from matter : much less can reason. That all human knowledge hath not its rise from sense. The proper function qf sense, and that it is never, deceived. An addition qf three considerations for the en forcing qf this first argument, and further clearing the immate riality qf the soul. That there is in man a faculty which 1. controls sense : and 2. collects and unites aU the perceptions of our several senses. 3. That memory and prevision are not explicable upon the supposition qf matter and motion. W E shall therefore now endeavour to prove, that the soul of man is something really distinct from his body, of_an indivisible nature^ and so cannot be I divided into such parts as should flit one from ano ther ; and consequently is apt of its own nature to remain to eternity, and so will do, except the de crees of heaven should abandon it from being. K 74 OF THE IMMORTALITY And first, we shaU prove it ab absurdo, and here do as the mathematicians used. to do in such kind of demonstrations : we wUl suppose that, if the reasonable soul be not of such an immaterial na ture, then it must be a body, and so suppose it to be made up as aU bodies are : where, because the opinions of phUosophers differ, we shaU only take one, viz. that of Epicurus, which supposeth it to be made up by a fortuitous concourse of atoms ; and in that demonstrate against all the rest : (for indeed herein a particular demonstration is a universal, as it is in all mathematical demonstrations of this kind.) For, if all that which is the basis of our reasons and understandings, which we here caU the substance of the soul, be nothing else but a mere body, and therefore be infinitely divisible, as all bo dies are ; it will be all one in effect whatsoever no tion we have ofthe generation or production there of. We may give it, if we please, finer words, and use more demure and smooth language about it than Epicurus did, as some that, lest they should speak too rudely and rustically of it by caUing it matter, wUl name it effiorescentia materia? : and yet, lest that should not be enough, add Aristotle's quint essence to it also : they wiU be so trim and courtly in defining of it, that they wUl not caU it by the name of aer, ignis, or fiamma, as some ofthe ancient vulgar phUosophers did, bnt fios fiamma? : and yet the Epicurean poet could use as much chymistry in exalting his fancy as these subtUe doctors do ; and when he would dress out the notion of it more gaudily, he resembles it to * flos Bacchi, and spiri- * LucrcU Lib. III. OF THE SOUL. 75 tus unguenti suavis. But, when we have taken away this disguise of wanton wit, we shall find nothing better than mere body, which wUl be recoUing back perpetually into its own inert and sluggish passive ness : though we may think we have quickened it never so much by this subtile artifice of words and phrases, a man's new-born soul wUl for aU this be but little better than his body ; and, as that is, be but a rasura corporis alieni, made up of some small and thin shavings pared off from the bodies of the parents by a continual motion of the several parts of it ; and must afterwards receive its augmentation from that food and nourishment which is taken in, as the body doth. So that the very grass we walk over in the fields, the dust and mire in the streets that we tread upon, may, according to the true meaning of this duU phUosophy, after many refin- ings, macerations, and maturations, which nature performs by the help of motion, spring up into so many rational souls, and prove as wise as any Epi curean, and discourse as subtily of what it once was, when it lay drooping in a senseless passiveness. This conceit is so gross, that one would think it wanted nothing but that witty sarcasm that Plutarch cast upon Nicocles the Epicurean, to confute it, n ^vrr^ arb[Jboug saypv sv avry roaauragy oiat suvs\6ouaai co- pbv av eyevvqaav. But, because the heavy minds of men are so fre quently sinking into this earthly fancy, we shall further search into the entraUs of this phUosophy ; and see how like that is to a rational soul, of which it pretends to declare the production. Lucretius first of all taking notice of the mighty swiftness and celerity of the soul in all its operations, lest his 76 OF THE IMMORTALITY matter should be too soon tired and not able to keep pace with it, he first casts the atoms prepared for this purpose into such perfect spherical and small figures as might be most capable of these swift im pressions ; for so he, At, quod mobile tantopere est, constare rotundis Perquam seminibus debet, perquamque minutis, Momine uti parvo possint impulsa moveri. Lib. III. But here, before we go any further, we might in quire what it should be that should move these small and insensible globes of matter. For Epicurus' two principles, which he caUs plenum and inane, wUl here by no means serve our turn to find out motion. For, though our communes notitia? assure us, that wherever there is a multiplicity of parts, (as there is in every quantitative being) there may be a variety of application in those parts one to another, and so a mobility; yet motion itself will not so easUy arise out of a plenum, though we allow it an empty space and room enough to play up and down in. For we may conceive a body, which is his ple num, only as trine dimensum, being longum, latum et profundum, without attributing any motion at aU to it: and Aristotle in hisDe Ccelo doubts not herein to speak plainly, on ex row euuiarog xivqaig oux eyyiverai, 1 that motion cannot arise from a body.' For in deed this power of motion must needs argue some efficient cause, as Tully hath well observed, if we suppose any rest antecedent ; or if any body be once moving, it must also find some potent efficient to stay it and settle it in rest, as Simplicius hath somewhere in his comment upon Epictetus wisely determined. So that, if we wiU suppose either mo- i jr OF THE SOUL. 77 tion or rest to be contained originally in the nature of any body ; we must of necessity conclude some potent efficient to produce the contrary, or else at tribute this power to bodies themselves ; which wiU at last grow unbounded and infinite, and indeed altogether inconsistent with the nature of a body. But yet, though we should grant aU this which Lucretius contends for, how shaU we force up these particles of matter into any true and real percep tions, and make them perceive their own or others' v motions, which he caUs motus sensiferi ? For he u having first laid down his principles of all being, as he supposeth, (neither is he wUling to leave his ¦ deities themselves tout of the number) he only re quires these postulata to unfold the nature of aU by, concursus, motus, ordo, positura, figura?. Lib. I. But how any such thing as sensation, or much less reason, should spring out of this barren soil, how weU tilled soever, no composed mind can imagine. For indeed that infinite variety which is in the mag nitude of parts, their positions, figures and motions, may easily, and indeed must needs produce an in finite variety of phenomena, which the Epicurean philosophy calls eventa. And accordingly, where there is a sentient faculty, it may receive the great est variety of impressions from them, by which the perceptions, which are the immediate result of a knowing faculty, wiH be distinguished : yet cannot | the power itself of sensation arise from them, no more than vision can rise out of a glass, whereby it should be able to perceive these idola that paint themselves upon it, though it were never so exactly 78 OF THE IMMORTALITY polished, and they much finer than they are or can be. Neither can those smaU corpuscula, which in them selves have no power of sense, ever produce it by any kind of concourse or motion ; for so a cause might in its production rise up above the height of its own nature and virtue ; which I think every calm contemplator of truth wUl judge impossible : for seeing whatsoever any effect hath, it must needs derive from its causes, and can receive no other tincture and impression than they can bestow upon it ; that signature must first be in the cause itself, which is by it derived to the effect. And therefore the wisest phUosophers amongst the ancients uni versally concluded that there was some higher prin ciple than mere matter, which was the cause of all life and sense, and that to be immortal : as the Pla tonists, who thought this reason sufficient to move them to assert a mundane soul. And Aristotle, though he talks much of nature, yet he delivers his mind so cloudily, that all that he hath said of it may pass with that which himself said of his Acroa- tici libri, or physics, that they were exfahop&voi xai fw} \xheho\i!evoi. Nor is it likely that he who was so little satisfied with his own notion of nature as being the cause of all motion and rest, as seemingly to desert it while he placeth so many intelligences about the heavens, could much please himself with such a gross conceit of mere matter, that that should be the true moving and sentient entelech of some other matter ; as it is manifest he did not. But indeed Lucretius himself, though he could in a jolly fit of his over-flushed and fiery fancy tell us, OF THE SOUL. 79 Et ridere potest non ex ridentibu* factus, Et sapere, et doctis rationem reddere dictis, Non ex seminibus sapientibus, atque disertis : Lib. II. yet in more cool thoughts he found his own com mon notions too sturdy to be so easily silenced ; and therefore set his wits at work to find the most quintessential particles of matter that may be, that might do that feat, which those smooth spherical bodies, calor, a'e'r, and ventus (for aU come into this composition) could not do : and this was of such a subtile and exalted nature, that his earthly fancy could not comprehend it, and therefore he con fesses plainly he could not tell what name to give it, though, for want of a better, he calls it mobilem vim, as neither his master before him, who was pleased to compound the soul (as Plutarch relates*) of four ingredients, ex iroiou ituguhoug, ix votou asgwhoug, lx iroiou ¦avsuparixou, sx rerdp'ov nvog axarovopdarou o jjv auru aioSnnxbv. But because this giant-like Pro teus found himself here bound with such strong cords, that notwithstanding all his struggling he could by no means break them off from him, we shall relate his own words the more largely. I find them, Lib. III. Sic calor, atque aer, et venti caeca potestas Mista creant unam naturam, et mobilis ilia Vis, initium motus abs se quae dividit ollis : Sensifer unde oritur primum per viscera motus. Nam penitus prorsum latet haec natura, subestque ; Nee magis hac infra quidquam est in corpore nostro ; Atque anima' st anima- proporro totius ipsa. Quod genus in nostris membris et corpore toto * Lib. IV. Dc Placitis Philosophoruin. 80 OF THE IMMORTALITY Mista latens animi vis est, animaeque potestas, Corporibus quia de parvis paucisque creata est. Sic tibi nominis haec expers vis, facta minutis Corporibus, latet — — — — Thus we see how he found himself overmastered with difficulties, whUe he endeavoured to find the place of the sensitive powers in matter : and yet this is the highest that he dares aim at, namely, to prove that sensation might from thence derive its original, as stiffly opposing any higher power of reason ; which we shall in lucro ponere against an other time. But surely had not the Epicureans abandoned all logic, together with some other sciences, (as TuUy and Laertius teU us they did) they would here have found themselves too much pressed with this argument, (which yet some will think to be but levis armatura? in respect of some other) and have found it as little short of a demonstration to prove the soul's immortality as the Platonists themselves did: but herein how they dealt, Plotinus* hath well observed of them all who denied lives and souls to be immortal, which he asserts, and make them nothing but bodies, that when they were pinched with the strength of any argument fetched from the tpucrig h^aerngiog of the soul, it was usual a- mongst them to call this body irvsupa irSg sy/tv, or ventus certo quodam modo se habens ; to which he well replies, ri ro iroku^gukkr^rov abroig itug e%ov, sit 8 xarapeuyoutriv avayxaZpftevoi rfo&foai ak\riv iragaro au- pa y_Jin immediate conyerse^with ourselves, and a distinct sense oftheir operations ; whereas all our knowledge of the body is little better than merely historical, which we gather up by scraps and piecemeals from more doubtful and uncertain experiments which we make of them : but the no tions which we have of a mind, i. e. something within us that thinks, apprehends, reasons, and discourses, are so clear and distinct from all those notions which we can fasten upon a body, that we can easUy con ceive that if all body-being in the world were des troyed, yet we might then as well subsist as we now do. For whensoever we take notice of those im mediate motions of our own minds, whereby they make themselves known to us, we find no such thing in them as extension or divisibility, which are con tained in every corporeal essence : and having no such thing discovered to us from our nearest fami liarity with our own souls, we could never so easily know whether they had any such things as bodies joined to them or not, did not those extrinsical im pressions that their turbulent motions make upon them admonish them thereof. But, as the more we reflect upon our own minds, we find all intelligible things more clear, (as when 106 OF THE IMMORTALITY we look up to the heaven§, we see all things more bright and radiant, than when we look down upon this dark earth when the sunbeams are withdrawn from it :) so, when we see all intelligible being con centring together in a greater oneness, and aU kind of multiplicity running more and more into the strictest unity, till at last we find all variety and di vision sucked up into a perfect simplicity, where all happily conspire together in the most undivided peace and friendship ; we then easily perceive that the reason of all diversity and distinction is (that I may use Plotinus' words not much differently from his meaning) (jt/erd&uctig awo vou e\g koyiffUibv. For, though in our contentious pursuits after science, we cast wisdom, power, eternity, goodness, and the like, into several formalities, that so we may trace down science in a constant chain of deductions ; yet, in our naked intuitions and visions of them, we clearly discern that goodness and wisdom lodge to gether, justice and mercy kiss each Other : and all these, and whatsoever pieces else, into which our reasons may sometime break divine and intelligible being, are fast knit up together in the invincible bonds of eternity. And in this sense is that notion of Propius, descanting upon Plato's riddle. of the soul, \ug yevwfrq xai ay'evvrfrog, * as if it were gener ated and yet not generated'] to be understood ; ygovog ccpa xai aiuv iregi rrp -^/uy^v, the soul partaking of time in its broken and particular conceptions and apprehensions, and of eternity in its comprehensive and stable contemplations. I need not say that when the soul is once got up to the top of this bright Olympus, it wUl then no more doubt of its own im mortality, or fear any dissipation, or doubt whether OF THE SOUL. 107 any drowsy sleep shall hereafter seize upon it : no, j it will then feel itself grasping fast and safely its j own iminortality, and view itself in the horizon of \ eternity. In such sober kind of ecstacies did Plo tinus find his own soul separated from his body, as if it had divorced it for a time from itself: irokkdxig iyeigopsvog sig spaurbv ix rou aaipurog, xai yevbpsvog ruv [th akkav s\a), kftiaurov he s'iaia, SavfAuerbv qkixov bgm xdkkog, &c. ' I being often awakened into a sense of my self, and being sequestered from my body, and be taking myself from all things else into myself; what admirable beauty did I then behold,' &c. as he him self teUs us.* Thus is that intelligence begotten which Proclus t calls ' a correction of science :' his notion is worth our taking notice of, and gives us in a manner a brief recapitulation of our former discourse, showing, the higher we ascend in the contemplation of the soul, the higher still we rise above this low sphere of sense and matter. His words are these, Awn? $ sirtarrifjai ug psv b -^u%a7g av'e- ksyxrog eenv, skeyyjrai S1 curb vou, &c. that is, * science, as it is in the soul (by which he means the dis- coursive power of it) is blameless, but yet is cor rected by the mind ; as resolving that which is in divisible, and dividing simple being as if it were compounded : as fancy corrects sense for discerning with passion and material mixture, from which that purifies its object ; opinion corrects fancy, because it apprehends things by forms and phantasms, which itself is above ; and science corrects opinion, be cause it knows without "discerning of causes ; and the mind, (as was insinuated) or the intuitive fa- * Enn. IV. Lib. viii. cap. I. f L'b- "• '" plat- Tim> 108 OF THE IMMORTALITY culty corrects the scientifical, because, by a pro gressive kind of analysis, it divides the intelligible object, where itself knows and sees things together in their undivided essence : wherefore this only is immoveable, and science or scientifical reason is in ferior to it in the knowledge of true being.' Thushe. But here we must use some caution, lest we should arrogate too much to the power of our own souls, which indeed cannot raise up themselves into that pure and steady contemplation of true being ; but will rather act with some multiplicity or srsgoryg (as they speak) attending it. But thus much of its high original may appear to us, that it can (as our author told us) correct itself, for dividing and dis joining therein, as knowing all to be every way one most entire and simple : though yet all men cannot easily improve their own understandings to this high degree of comprehension ; and therefore aU ancient phUosophers, and Aristotle himself, made it the peculiar privilege of some men more abstracted from themselves and all corporeal commerce. CHAP. VII. What it is that, beyond the highest and most subtile speculations whatsoever, does clear and evidence to a goodman the immortal ity qf his soul. That true goodness and virtue begets the most raised sense qf this immortality. Plotinus? excellent discourse to this purpose. AND now, that we may conclude the argument in hand, we shaU add but this one thing further to clear the soul's immortality, and it is indeed that OF THE SOUL. 109 which breeds a true sense of it, viz. True and real goodness. Our highest speculations ofthe soul may beget a sufficient conviction thereof within us, but yet it is only true goodness and virtue in the souls of men that can make them both know and love, believe and delight themselves in their own immor taHty. Though every good man is not so logically t subtile as to be able by fit mediums to demonstrate his own immortality, yet he sees it in a higher light: his soul being purged and enhghtened by true sanc tity, is more capable of those divine irradiations, , whereby it feels itself in conjunction with God, and I by a euvduyetu (as the Greeks speak) the light of di- J vine goodness mixing itself with the light of its own j reason, sees more clearly not only that it may, if it \ please the supreme Deity, of its own nature exist \ eternally, but also that it shall do so : it knows it ( shall never be deserted of that free goodness that always embraceth it : it knows that Almighty love which it lives by, to be stronger than death, and \ more powerful than the grave ; it will not suffer [ those holy ones that are partakers of it to lie inhell, •¦ or their souls to see corruption ; and, though worms \ may devour their flesh, and putrefaction enter into \ those bones that fence it, yet it knows that its Re- \ deemer lives, and that it shall at last see him with a pure intellectual eye, which wiU then be clear and ! bright, when all that earthly dust, which converse , with this mortal body filled it with, shall be remo ved: it knows that God will never forsake his own I life which, he liatliquickened in it; he will never1; deny"tiioleiar^hT^esires of & blissful fruition off himseH0, which the lively sense of his own goodness i hath excited within it : those breathings and gasp- j 1 10 OF THE IMMORTALITY ings after an eternaljgarticipation of him are but the energy 01 his own breathwlthin us ; jf he had had any mind to. destroy it, he would never have shown_jj^i^^things^ done ; he would not raise it up to such mounts of vision, to show it aU the glory of that heavenly Canaan flowing with eternal and unbounded pleasures, and then preci pitate it again into that deep and darkest abyss of death and non-entity. Divine goodness cannot, it wUl not, be so cruel to holy souls that are such ambitious suitors for his love. The more they con template the blissful effluxes of his divine love upon themselves, the more they find themselyes strength ened with an undaunted confidence in him ; and look not upon themselves in these poor bodUy rela tions and dependences, but intheir eternal alliances, &g xbaptot, . wg u!oi rou Seov, (as Arrianus sometimes \ speaks) _as_the sons of_God, who is the Fatherjrf souls, souls that are able to live any where in this j spaciojisjaniverse, and_ better out. pf this dark and i lonesome cell of bodily matter,, which is always cKeckihg and clogging them in their noble motions, than in it: as knowing that when they leave this body, they shall then be received into everlasting \ habitations, and converse freely and familiarly with \ that source of life and spirit which they conversed | with in this life in a poor, disturbed, and straitened / manner. It k indeed nothing else that makes men question the immortality of their souls, so much as their own base and Wthly loves, which first makes them wish their soWwere not immortal, and then to think they are nor^ which Plotinus hath well observed, and accordingly, hath soberly pursued this argument. OF THE SOUL. Ill I cannot omit a large recital of his discourse, which tends so much to disparage that inanimated philosophy which these latter ages have brought forth ; as also those heavy spirited Christians that find so little divine life and activity in their own souls, as to imagine them to fall into such a dead sleep as soon as they leave this earthly tabernacle, that they cannot be awakened again, till that last trumpet and the voice of an archangel shaU rouse them up. Our author's discourse is this,* having first premised this principle, that every divine thing is immortal, kd&apev he "fyuyfiv, p) rrjv brS amyjan, Sec. ' Let us now consider a soul (saith he) not such a one as is immersed into the body having contracted unreasonable concupiscence and anger (eirfoupiuv xai SufJ!,bv, according to which they were wont to dis tinguish between the irascible and concupiscible fa culty) and other passions ; but such a one as hath cast away these, and as Httle as may be commu nicates with the body : such a one as this will suf ficiently manifest that all vice is unnatural to the soul, and something acquired only from abroad ; and that the best wisdom and all other virtues lodge in a purged soul, as being alHed to it. If therefore such a soul shall reflect upon itself, how shall it not appear to itself to be of such a kind of nature as divine and eternal essences are ? for wisdom and true virtue being divine effluxes can never enter into any unhallowed and mortal thing : it must therefore needs be divine, seeing it is filled with a divine nature hid auyy'sveiav xai rb bpoouciov by its kin dred and consanguinity therewith. Whoever there- * Enn TV. Lib. vii. cnp. 10. 112 OF THE IMMORTALITY fore amongst us is such a one, differs but little in his soul from angelical essences ; and that little is the present inhabitation in the body, in which he is inferior to them. And if every man were of this raised temper, or any considerable number had but such holy souls, there would be no such infidels as would in any sort disbelieve the soul's immortality. But now the vulgar sort of men beholding the souls of the generality so mutilated and deformed with vice and wickedness, they cannot think of the soul as of any divine and immortal being ; . though in deed they ought to judge of things as they are in their own naked essences, and not with respect to that which extra-essentially adheres to them ; which is the great prejudice of knowledge. Contemplate therefore the soul of man denuding it of all that which itself is not, or let him that does this, view his own soul ; then he will believe it to be immortal, when he shall behold it b ru voriru xai sv ru xaSag», fixed in an intelligible and pure nature ; he shall then behold his own inteUect contemplating, not any sensible thing, but eternal things, with that which is eternal, that is, with itself, looking into the intellectual world, being itself made all lucid, intel lectual, and shining with the sunbeams of eternal truth, borrowed from the first good, which perpe- tually rayeth forth his truth upon all intellectual [ beings. One thus qualified may seem, without any arrogance, to take up that saying of Empedocles, Xoc/ggr, syu h' vpiv Ssbg dpQgorog. Farewell all earthly allies, I am henceforth no mortal being, but an immortal angel, ascending up into divinity, and reflecting upon that likeness of it which I find in myself. When true sanctity and purity shall ground OF THE SOUL. 113 him in the knowledge of divine things, then shall the inward sciences, that arise from the bottom of his own soul, "display themselves ; which indeed are the only true sciences : for the soul runs not j out of itself to behold temperance and justice abroad, but its own light sees them in the contem- i plation of its own being, and that divine essence which was before enshrined within itself.' I might, after all this, add many more reasons for a further confirmation of this present thesis, which are as numerous as the soul's relations and productions themselves are ; but to every one who is wUling to do his own soul right, this evidence we have already brought in is more than suffi cient. CHAP. VIII. An appendix, vontaining an inquiry into the se?ise and opinion qf Aristotle concerning the immortality qf the soul. That accord ing to him the rational soul is separable from the body, and immortal. The true meaning of his intellectus agens and pa- tiens. JriAVING done with the several proofs of the soul's immortaHty, (that great principle of natural theology, which if it be not entertained as a com munis notitia, as I doubt not but that it. is by the vulgar sort of men, or as an axiom, or, if you wUl, a theorem of free and impartial reason, all endea vours in religion will be very cool and languid) it 114 OF THE IMMORTALITY may not be amiss to inquire a little concerning his opinion, whom so many take for the great intelli gencer of nature, and omniscient oracle of truth ; though it be too manifest that he hath so defaced the sacred monuments of the ancient metaphysical theology by his profane hands, that it is hard to see that lovely face of truth which was once engra ven upon them, (as some of his own interpreters have long ago observed) and so blurred those fair copies of divine learning which he received from his predecessors, that his late interpreters, who' make him their all, are sometimes as little acquaint ed with his meaning and design, as they are with that elder philosophy which he so corrupts ; which indeed is the true reason they are so ambiguous in determining his opinion of the soul's immortality ; which yet he often asserts and demonstrates in his three books De Anima. We shall not here traverse this notion through them all, but only briefly take notice of that which hath made his expositors stum ble so much in this point ; the main whereof is that definition which he gives of the soul, wherein he seems to make it nothing else for the genus of it, but an entelechia or informative thing, which spends all its virtue upon that matter which it in forms, ancl cannot act any other way than merely by information ; being indeed nothing else but some material sihog, like an impression in wax which cannot subsist without it, or else the result of it : whence it is that he caUs only either material forms, or the func tions and operations of those forms, by this name. But indeed he intended not this for a general defini tion ofthe soul of man, and therefore after he had laid down this particular definition of the soul, he tells OF THE SOUL. 1 15 us expressly, * that that which we call the rational soul is ypiporrj or ' separable from the body,' hid rb fjt,rjhevbg slvai Gaparag brek'synav, ' because it is not the entelech of any body.' Which he lays down the demonstration of, in several places of all those three books, by inquiring si sari ri rav rrjg ^uyfjg egyav $ ira- ^ri^drav 'ihiov, as he speaks, t ' whether the soul hath any proper function or operation of its own,' or whether all be compounded, and result from the soul and body together : and in this inquiry finding that all sensations and passions arise as well from the bo dy as from the soul, and spring out ofthe conjunc tion of both of them, (which he therefore calls hukoi kbyoi, as being begotten by the soul upon the body) he concludes that aU this savours of nothing else but a material nature, inseparable from the body. But then finding acts of mind and understanding, which cannot be propagated from matter, or casually de pend upon the body, he resolves the principles from whence they flow to be immortal ; which he thus sets down, t iregi hs rou vou xai rra Ssagrirtxrjg huvd^sug, obh'sxu pavsgbv, dkk' eoixs -^vyjjg y'svog 'iregov elvai, &c. that is, ' now as for the mind and theoretical power, it appears not,' viz. that they belong to that soul which in the former chapter was defined by brske- %eia, * but it seems to be another kind of soul, and that only is separable from the body, as that which is eternal and immortal from that which is corrup tible. But the other powers or parts of the soul, viz. the vegetative and sensitive, are not separable, xaSdirsg paat nvsg, as some think.' Where by these, \_nvsg some] which he here refutes, he manifestly « Lib. 11. cap. I. f Lib- l- caP- 1- f Lib- l1, caP' " 116 OF THE IMMORTALITY means the Platonists and Pythagoreans, who held that all kinds of souls were immortal, as well the souls of beasts as of men ; whereas he, upon that former inquiry, concluded that nothing was immor tal, but that which is the seat of reason and under standing : and so his meaning is, that this rational soul is altogether a distinct essence from those other; or else that glory which he makes account, he reaps from his supposed victory over the other sects of philosophers, will be much eclipsed, seeing they themselves did not so much contend for that which he decries, viz. an exercise of any such informative faculties in a state of separation, neither do we find them much more, to reject one part of that com plex axiom of his, to (usv atoSqnxbv oux avsu o~uparog, 6 hs voug xagio-rbg, * ' that which is sensitive is not without the body, but the intellect or mind is se parable,' than they do the other. The other difficulty with which Aristotle's opinion seems to be clogged, is that conclusion which he lays down, o' hs irdSrsnxbg voug, pSagrbg, * which is commonly thus expounded, intellectus patiens est corruptibilis. But all this difficulty will soon be cleared, if once it may appear how ridi culous their conceit is, that from that chapter fetch that idle distinction of intellectus agens et patiens ; meaning by the agens, that which prepares phan tasms, and exalts them into the nature of inteUigi ble species, and then propounds them to the patiens to judge thereof: whereas indeed he means nothing else by his voug iraSrwxbg, but only the understand ing in potentia, and by his voug iroiqnxbg, the same in • Lib. III. cap. 4. | Lib. III. cap. 5. OF THE SOUL. 117 actu Qr in habitu, as the schoolmen are wont to • phrase it : and accordingly thus lays down his meaning and method of this notion. In the pre ceding chapter of that book, he disputes against Plato's connate species, as being afraid, lest if the soul should be prejudiced by any home-born no tions, it would not be indifferent to the entertaining of any other truth. Where, by the way, we may observe how unreasonable his argument is : for if the soul hath no such stock of principles to trade with, nor any proper notions of its own that might be a xgtrqgiov of aU opinions, it would be so indif ferent to any, that the foulest error might be as easily entertained by it as the fairest truth ; neither could it ever know what guest it receives, whether truth, or falsehood. But yet our author found him self able to swallow down this absurdity, though when he had done he could not well digest it. For he could not but take notice of that which was ob vious for any one to reply, that irdg voug ian vorirbg, and so reflecting upon itself, may find matter with in to work upon ; and so lays down this scruple in a way not much different from his masters, xai au- rbg. he vorirbg ian, uairsg ra vorira, &c. ' but the soul itself is also intelligible, as well as aU other intelli gible natures are ; and in those beings which are purely abstracted from matter, that which under stands is the same with that which is understood.' Thus he. But not being master of this notion, he finds it a little too unruly for him, and falls to in quire why the soul should not then always be in actu; quitting himself of the whole difficulty at once by telHng us, that our souls are here clogged with a hyle or matter that cleaves to them, and so all the 118 OF THE IMMORTALITY matter of their knowledge is contained in sensible objects, which they must extract -out of them, be ing themselves only iv huvdpst or in potentia ad in- telligendum. Just as in a like, argument (Chap. VIII.) he would needs persuade us, that the under standing beholds all things in the glass of fancy ; and then questioning how our irgwra vori^ara or ' first principles of knowledge' should be phan tasms, he grants ' that they are not indeed phan tasms, dkk' oux avsu pavraa^drcov, but yet they are not -without phantasms ;' which he thinks is enough to say, and so by his mere dictate without any fur ther discussion to solve that knot : whereas in all reflex acts, whereby the soul reviews its own opin ions, . and finds out the nature of them, it makes neither use of sense or phantasms ; but acting im mediately by its own power, finds itself dauparov xai yjugiarrjv aupdrav, as Simplicius observes. But to return, this hyle or matter which our au thor supposeth to hinder a free and uninterrupted exercise of understanding, is indeed nothing else but the soul's potentiality ; and not any kind of di visible or extended nature. And, therefore, when he thus distinguisheth between his intellectus agens and patiens, he seems to mean almost nothing else but what our ordinary metaphysicians do in their distinction of actus and potentia, (as Simplicius hath truly observed) when they teU us, that the finest created nature is made up of these two compound ed together. For we must know that the genius of his phUosophy led him to fancy a uiroxsipsvbv n, ' a certain subject or obediential power' in every thing that fell within the compass of physical specu lation, or that had any relation to any natural bo- OF THE SOUL. 119 dy ; and some other power which was sihoiroiouv, that was of an active and operating nature : and Consequently that both these principles were in the soul itself, which as it was capable of receiving impressions and species from the fancy, and in a posse to understand, so it was passive ; but as it doth actually understand, so it is itoinnxbg or active. And with this notion he begins his fifth chapter, 'Eirsi hs aiWeg b airdar) rri puaei ian' ri, rb \Csv ukrj exda- tu y'svei, &c. that is, ' Seeing that in every nature there is something which as a first subject is all things potentially, and some active principle which produceth all things, as art doth in matter ; it is necessary that the soul also partake of these differ ences.' And this he illustrates by light and colours ; resembling the passive power of the intellect to colours, the active or energetical to light : and therefore he says, ' it is yjagiarbg, xai djxiyrig, xai d- ira^sng, separable, unmixed, and impassible ;' and so at last concludes, yju^ta^eig hi ian pbvov rou§' oVeg sari, ' in the state of separation this intellect is al ways that which it is (that is, it is always active and energetical, as he had told us before, njf ouaia uv iv'sgysia, the essence of it being activity) xai rouro Ujbvov dSdvarov xai d'ihiov, ou (JtiV/i[/iOveuo[Aev he on rouro psv uira'&eg, and this only is immortal and eternal, but we do not remember because it is impassible.' In which last words he seems to disprove Plato's Re- miniscentia, because the soul in a state of separa tion being always in act, the passive power of it, which then first begins to appear when it is embo died, could not represent or contain any such tra ditional species as the energetical faculty acted up on before ; seeing there was then no fancy to retain 120 OF THE IMMORTALITY them in, as Simplicius expounds it, hib iv rjj irsy rSv pvri\hoveuruv voriaei, hebpeba irdvrwg rou fteygt pavraaiag irgotbvrog kbyou, because in all remembrance we must reflect upon our fancy. And this our author seems to glance at, it being indeed never out of his eye, in these words we have endeavoured to give an ac count of, o he ira&nnxbg voug pSagrbg, xai avsu rourou ouSsv voei, ' but the passive inteUect is corruptible, and without this we can understand nothing in this life.' And thus our forenamed commentator doubts not to gloss on them. CHAP. IX. A main difficulty concerning the immortality of the soul [viz. The strong sympathy of the soul with the body"] answered. An an swer to another inquiry, viz. Under what account impressions derived from the body do fall in morality. W E have now done with the confirmation of this point, which is the main basis of all religion, and shaU not at present trouble ourselves with those difficulties that may seem to incumber it ; which indeed are only such as beg for a solution, but do not, if they be impartiaUy considered, proudly con test with it : and such of them which depend upon any hypothesis which we may apprehend to be laid down in Scripture, I cannot think them to be of any such moment, but that anyone who deals free ly and ingenuously with this portion of God's truth, OF THE SOUL. 121 may from thence find a far better method of an swering, than he can of moving any scruples against the soul's immortality, which that most strongly every where supposes, and does not so positively and hnrug lay down, as presume that we have an an tecedent knowledge of it, and therefore principaUy teaches us the right way and method of providing in this Hfe for our happy subsistence in that eternal estate. And as for what pretends to reason or ex perience, I think it may not be amiss briefly to search into one main difficulty concerning the soul's immortaHty : and that is, that strange kind of de pendency which it seems to have on the body, whereby it seems constantly to comply and sympa thize therewith, and to assume to itself the frailties and infirmities thereof, to laugh and languish as it. were together with that : and so when the body is composed to rest, our soul seems to sleep together with it ; and as the spring of bodUy motion seated in our brains is more clear or muddy, so the con ceptions of our minds are more distinct or dis turbed. To answer this difficulty, it might be enough per haps to say, that the sympathy of things is no suf ficient argument to prove the identity of their es sences by, as I think all wiU grant ; yet we shall en deavour more fully to solve it. And for that purpose we must take notice, that though our souls be of an incorporeal nature, as we have already demonstrated, yet they are united to our bodies, not as assisting forms or intelligences, as some have thought, but in some more immediate way ; though we cannot teU what that is, it being the great arcanum in man's nature^ that it was " ~' ' """" ' oT 122 OF THE IMMORTALITY which troubled Plotinus so much, when he had contemplated the immortality of it, that, as he speaks of himself ',* eig koyia^bv dxsb vou xara&ag, dirogw irug wore xai vuv xaraQaiva, xai oV/aj iror'e (fjOi evhov r] -^uy^ yey'svnrai rou awparog, rouro ouaa olbv ipdvrj xaSr' saurr)v, xai irsg ouaa iv au^ari. But indeed to make such a complex thing as man is, it was necessary that the soul should be so united to the body, as to share in its passions and infirmities so far as they are void of sinfulness. And as the .body alone could not perform any act of sensation or reason, and so it self become a Zfiov irokmxbv, so neither would the soul be capable of providing for the necessities of the body, without some way whereby a feeling and sense of them might be conveyed to it ; neither could it take sufficient care of this corporeal lUe, as nothing pertaining to it, were it not solicited to a natural compunction and compassion by the indi gencies of our bodies. It cannot be a mere men tal speculation that would be so sensibly affected with hunger or cold or other griefs that our bodies, necessarUy partake of, to move our souls to take care for their relief: and were there not such a commerce between our souls and bodies, as that our souls also might be made acquainted by a pleasur able and delightful sense of those things that most gratify our bodies, and tend most to the support of their crasis and temperament ; the soul would be apt whoUy to neglect the body, and commit it wholly to all changes and casualties.^ Neither would it be any thing more to us than the body of a plant or star, which we contemplate sometimes " Enn. IV. Lib. viii. cap. I. OF THE SOUL. 123 with as much contentment as we do our own bodies, having as much of the theory of the one as of the other. And the relation that our souls bear to such peculiar bodies as they inhabit, is one and the same in point of notion and speculation with that which they have to any other body : and therefore that which determines the soul to this body more than that, must be some subtile vinculum that knits and unites it to it in a more physical way, which there fore Proclus sometimes calls irveupanxbv oyyiMt Trig ¦<\iuy/ig, * a spiritual kind of vehicle,' whereby cor poreal impressions are transferred to the mind, and the dictates and decrees of that are carried back again into the body to act and move it. He- raclitus, wittily glancing at these mutual aspects and intercourses, caUs them * dpoiQag dvayxaiag ix rZv buvriuv, ' the responsals or antiphons wherein each of them catcheth at the other's part, and keeps time with it ;' and so he tells us that there is bhbg avca Kai xara, ' a way that leads upwards and down wards between the soul and body,' whereby their affairs are made known to one another. For as the soul could not have a sufficient relation of the state and condition of our bodies, except it received some impressions from them ; so neither could our souls make use of our bodies, or derive their own virtue into them as they do, without some interme diate motions. For as some motions may seem to have their beginning in our bodies, or in some ex ternal mover, which are not known by our souls till their advertency be awakened by the impetuousness of them : so some other motions are derived by our * Plotin. Enn. IV. Lib. viii. cap. 1. 124 OF THE IMMORTALITY own wills into our bodies, but yet in such a way as they cannot be into any other body; for we cannot by the mere magical virtue of our wiUs move any thing else without ourselves, nor follow any such virtue by a concurrent sense of those mutations that are made by it, as we do in our own bodies. And as this conjugal affection and sympathy be tween soul and body are thus necessary to the being of mankind ; so we may further take notice of some peculiar part within us where aU this first begins : which a late sagacious philosopher hath happUy ob served to be in that part of the brain from whence all those nerves that conduct the animal spirits up and down the body take their first original ; seeing we find aU motions that first arise in our bodies, to direct their course straight up to that, as continu aUy respecting it, and there only to be sensated, and all the imperate motions of our wUls issuing forth from the same consistory. Therefore the animal spirits, by reason of their constant mobUity and swift motion, ascending to the place of the origi nation of our nerves, move the soul, which there sits enthroned, in some mysterious way ; and de scending at the beck of our wiUs from thence, move all the muscles and joints in such sort as they are guided and directed by the soul. And if we ob serve the subtile mechanism of our own bodies, we may easUy conceive how the least motion in these animal spirits wUl, by their relaxing or distending the nerves, membranes, and muscles, according to their different quantity, or the celerity and qua- Hty of their motions, beget all kind of motions Hkewise in the organical part of our bodies. And therefore that our souls may the better inform our OF THE SOUL. 125 bodies, they must perceive all their varieties ; and because they have such an immediate proximity to these spirits, therefore, also, aU the motions of our souls in the highest way of reason and understand ing are apt to stir these quick and nimble spirits always attending upon them, or else fix them too much. And thus we may easily see, that should our souls be always acting and working within us, our bodies could never take that rest and repose which is requisite for the conservation of nature. As we may easUy perceive in all our studies and meditations that are most serious, our spirits are the more fixed, attending the beck of our minds. And except this knot whereby our souls are wedded to our bodies were unloosed that our souls were loose from them, they could not act, but presently some motion or other would be impressed upon our bo dies : as every motion in our bodies that is extra ordinary, when our nerves are distended with the animal spirits, by a continual communication of it self in these nerves like so many intended chords to their original, moves our souls ; and so, though we always perceive that one of them is primarily affected, yet we also find the other presently by consent to be affected too. And because the soul hath all corporeal passions and impressions thus conveyed to it, without which it could not express a due benevolence to that body which peculiarly belongs to it ; therefore as the mo tions of these animal spirits are more or less either disorderly and confused, or gentle and composed, so those souls especially who have not by the exer cise of true virtue got the dominion over them, are also more or less affected proportionably in their 126 OF THE IMMORTALITY operations. And therefore indeed to question whether the soul, that is of an immortal nature, should entertain these corporeal passions, is to doubt whether God could make a man or not, and to question that which we find by experience in ourselves ; for we find both that it doth thus, and yet that the original of these is sometimes from bo dies, and sometimes again by the force of our wills they are impressed upon our bodies. Here by the way we may consider in a moral way what to judge of those impressions that are derived from our bodies to our souls, which the Stoics call dkoya ird^rr not because they are repugnant to rea son, or are aberrations from it, but because they de rive not their original from reason, but from the body, which is akoybv rr and are by Aristotle, more agreeably to the ancient dialect, called evukoi kbyot, 1 material or corporeal ideas or impressions.' And these we may safely reckon, I think, amongst our adiaphora in morality, as being in themselves nei ther good nor evil, (as all the ancient writers have done) but only are formed into either by that stamp that the soul prints upon them, when they come to ?be entertained into it. And therefore whereas some are apt, in the most severe way, to censure rag irgurag xara puatv bgpdg, all those commotions and passions that first affect our souls ; they might do well more cautiously to distinguish between such of these motions as have their origination in our bodies, and such as immediately arise from our souls : else may w.e not too hastily displace the an cient termini, and remove the land-marks of virtue and vice ? For seeing the soul could not descend into any corporeal act, as it must do while it is more OF THE SOUL. 127 present to one body than another, except it could partake of the griefs and pleasures of the body ; can it be any more sinful for it to sensate this, than it is for it to be united to the body ? If our soul could not know what it is to eat or drink, but only by a mere ratiocination, collecting by a dry syllogistical discourse, that meats and drinks preserve the health and fabric of the body, repairing what daily exhales from it without sensating any kind of grief in the want, or refreshment in the use of them ; it would soon suffer the body to languish and decay. And therefore as these bodUy infirmities and passions are not evil in themselves ; so neither are they evil as they first affect our souls. When our animal spi rits, begot of fine and good blood, gently and nimb ly play up and down in our brains, and swiftly fly up and down our whole bodies, we presently find our fancies raised with mirth and cheerfulness : and as when our fancies are thus exalted, we may not call this the energy of grace ; so if our spleen or hypochondria, sweUing with terrene and sluggish vapours, send up such melancholic fumes into our heads as move us to sadness and timorousness, we cannot justly call that vice ; nor when the gall does pour forth its bitter juice into our liver, which mingling itself with the blood, begets fiery spirits that presently fly up into our brain, and there beget impressions of, anger within us. The Hke we may say of those corporeal passions which are not bred first of all by any peccant humours or distempera- tures in our own bodies, but are excited in us by any external objects which by those idola and ima ges that they present to our senses, or rather those motions they make in them, may presently raise 128 OF THE IMMORTALITY ^ such commotions in our spirits : for our body main tains not only a conspiration and consent of aU its own parts, but also it bears a like relation to other mundane bodies with which it is conversant, as be ing a part of the whole universe. But when our soul, once moved by the undisciplined petulancy of our animal spirits, shall foment and cherish that ir rational grief, fear, anger, love, or any other such like passions contrary to the dictates of reason ; it then sets the stamp of sinfulness upon them. It is the consent of our own wiUs that by brooding of them brings forth those hateful serpents. For though our souls be espoused to these earthly bo dies, and cannot but in some measure sympathize with them, yet hath the soul a true dominion of its own acts. It is not the mere passion, if we take it in a physical sense, but rather some inordinate ac tion of our own wiUs that entertain it : and these passions cannot force our wills, but we may be able to chastise and allay aU the inordinacy of them by the power of our wUls and reasons : and therefore God hath not made us under the necessity of sin, by making us men subject to such infirmities as these are, which are merely Zpai aupdrav, as the Greek phUosopher hath well caUed them, ' the blos somings and shootings forth of bodily life within us ;' which is but rb dv&gairivov or humanity. And, if I mistake not,, our divinity is wont some times to acknowledge some such thing in our Sa viour himself, who was in all things made like to us our sinfulness excepted. He was " a man of sor rows and acquainted with griefs,"* as the pro * Isa. Iiii. 3. OF THE SOUL. 129 phet Isaiah speaks of him : and when he was in bodily agonies and horrors, the powerful assaults thereof upon his soul moved him to petition his Father, that, " if it were possible, that bitter cup might pass from him ;"* and the sense of death so much afflicted him, that it bred in him the sad griefs which St. Peter expresseth by ahivug rou S-a- vdrou, 'the pangs or throes of death,' t and that fear that extorted a desire to be freed from it, as it is insinuated by that in Heb. v. 7. ' he was deli vered from what he feared ;' for so the words, being nothing else but an Hebraism, are to be rendered, siaaxouaSsig airb rrjg iuka&eiag. And we are wont to caU this the language and dictate of nature which lawfully endeavours to preserve itself, though pre sently a higher principle must bring all these under a subjection to God, and a free submission to his good pleasure : as it was with our Saviour, who moderated all these passions by a ready resignment of himself and his own will up to the will of God ; and though his humanity craved for ease and relax ation, yet that divine nature that was within him would not have it with any repugnancy to the su preme wUl of God. * Matt. xxvi. 39. f Acts "• 24' DISCOURSE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE AND NATURE OF GOD. " 'O yap savrov ytovs, yvuffiroa 9-iov* Stov Se o yvovs, ofAOieulbvitrirat 9-eS' ofASiatSwirui Si B'iM, a a%io$ ytvof&tvog Slow' a.%tog di ymrut Siov, a fcrj^h uvafyov vrgurroiv Siout aXXa (poavujv y.iv ra avrov, XoySv Se a (pgovu, tfoim Se « "koyu" Agapetus ad Justinianum. " Ex tot generibus nullum est animal prater hominem quod habeat notitiam aliquam Dei : ipsisque in hominibus nulla gens est neque tam immansueta, neque tam f era, qua non, etiamsi ignoret quahm habere Deum deceat, tamen habendum sciat" M. T. Cicero Lib. I. De Legibus. DISCOURSE EXISTENCE AND NATURE OF GOD. CHAP. I. That the best may to know God is by an attentive reflection upon our own souls. God more clearly and lively pictured upon fhe souls qf men, than upon any part qf the sensible world. W E shaU now come to the other cardinal princi ple of aU religion, and treat something concerning God. Where we shaU not so much demonstrate that he is^ as what he is. Both which we may best learn from a reflection upon our , own souls, as Plotinus hath well taught us, etg eaurbv lirtargspw, sig dgy/jv iiriargepei, ' he who reflects upon himself, 'reflects upon his own origi nal,' and finds the clearest impression of some eter nal nature and perfect being stamped upon his own soul. And therefore Plato seems sometimes to re prove the ruder sort of men in his times for their contrivance of pictures and images to put them- 134 OF THE EXISTENCE selves in mind of the Oeoi or angelical beings, and exhorts them to look into their own souls, which are the fairest images not only of the lower divine natures, but of the Deity itself; God haying 7 so copied forth himself into the whole life and en- ergy of man's soul, as that the lovely characters of Divinity may be most easily seen and read of aU men within themselves : as they say Phidias the famous statuary, after he had made the statue of Minerva with the greatest exquisiteness of art to be set up in the Acropolis at Athens, afterwards im- \ pressed his own image so deeply in her buckler, ; ut nemo delere possit aut divellere, qui totam statuam jnon imminueret. And if we would know what the impresse of souls is, it is nothing but God himself, who could not write his own name so as that it might be read, but only in rational natures. Nei ther' could he make such without imparting such an imitation of his own eternal understanding to them as might be a perpetual memorial of himself within them. And whenever we look upon our own soul in a right manner, we shall find an Urim and Thummim there, by which we may ask coun sel of God himself, who will have this always borne upon its breastplate. There is nothing that so debases and enthrals the souls of men, as the dismal and dreadful thoughts of their own mortality, which will not suffer them to look beyond this short span of time, to see an hour's length before them, or to look higher, than these material heavens; which though they could be stretched forth to infinity, yet would the space be too narrow for an enlightened mind, that will not be confined within the compass of corporeal di- AND NATURE OF GOD. 135 mensions. These black opinions of death and the non-entity of souls (darker than hell itself) shrink up the free-born spirit which is within us, which would otherwise be dilating and spreading itself boundlessly beyond aU finite being: and when these sorry pinching mists are once blown away, it finds this narrow 7 sphere of being to give way be fore it; and having once seen beyond time and matter, it finds then no more ends nor bounds to stop its swift and restless motion. It may then fly upwards from one heaven to another, tUl it be be yond all orb of finite being, swallowed up in the 1 boundless abyss of divinity, uirsgdvu rrig ouaiag, be yond aU that which darker thoughts are wont to represent under the idea of essence. This is that §s7ov axbrog of which the Areopagite speaks, which the higher our minds soar into, the more incompre hensible they find it. Those dismal apprehensions which pinion the souls of men to mortality, churl ishly check and starve that noble life thereof, which would always be rising upwards, and spread itself in a free heaven: and when once the soul hath shaken off these, when it is once able to look through a grave, and see beyond death, it finds a vast immensity of being opening itself more and more before it, and the ineffable light and beauty thereof shining more and more into it ; when it can rest and bear up itself upon an immaterial centre oT~immortality within, it will then find itself able to bear itself away by a self-reflection into the con templation of an eternal Deity. For though God hath copied forth his own per fections in this conspicable and sensible world, ac cording as it is capable of entertaining them ; yet 336 OF THE EXISTENCE the most clear and distinct copy of himself could be imparted to none else but to inteUigible and in- conspicable natures : and though the whole fabric of this visible universe be whispering out the no tions of a Deity, and always inculcates this lesson to the contemplators of it, ag iyh ireiroirixs b Ssbg, as Plotinus expresseth it ; yet we cannot understand it without some interpreter within. " The heavens" indeed " declare the glory of God, and the firma ment shows his handy-work," * and the rb yvuarbv rou Ssou, " that which may be known of God," even " his eternal power and Godhead," as St. Paul tells us, t is to be seen in these external appearances : yet it must be something within that must instruct us in all these mysteries, and we shall then best understand them, when we compare that copy which we find of them within ourselves, with that which we see without us. The schoolmen have well compared sensible and intelligible beings in re ference to the Deity, when they tell us that the one do only represent vestigia Dei, the other faciem Dei. We shall therefore here inquire what that knowledge of a Deity is, which a due converse with our own naked understandings wiU lead us into. * Psal. xix. 1. f ft°m- '• 19> 20' AND NATURE OF GOD. 137 CHAP. II. How the contemplation of our own souls, and a right reflection up on the operations thereof, may lead us into the knowledge qfl. The divine unity and omniscience, 2. God's omnipotence, 3. The divine love and goodness, 4. God's eternity, 5. His omnipre sence, 6. The divine freedom and liberty. J.T being our design to discourse more particular ly of that knowledge of the Deity that we may learn immediately from ourselves, we shall observe, ""First, There is nothing whereby our own souls are better known to us than by the properties and operations of reason : but when we reflect upon our own idea of pire"and perfect reason, we know that our own souls are not it, but only partake of it; and that it is of such a nature that we cannot denomi nate any other thing of the same rank with our selves by ; and yet we know certainly that it is, as finding from an inward sense of it within ourselves, that both we and other things else beside ourselves partake of it, and that we have it xara y!s6s\iv and not xar oueiav neither do we or any finite thing contain the source of it within ourselves : and be cause we have a distinct notion of the most perfect mind and understanding, we own our deficiency therein. And as that idea of understanding which we have within us points not out to us this or that particular, but something which is neither this nor that, but total, understanding ; so neither will any elevation of it serve every way to fit and answer that idea. And therefore when we find that we cannot attain to science but by a discursive deduc tion of one. thing from another, that our knowledge s 138 OF THE EXISTENCE is confined, and is not fully adequate and commen surate to the largest sphere of being, it not running quite through it, nor fining the whole area of it ; or that our knowledge is chronical and successive, and cannot grasp all things at once, but works by intervals, and runs out into division and multiplici ty ; we know aU this is from want of reason and understanding, and that a pure and simple mind and inteUect is free from aU these restraints and im perfections, and therefore can be no less than infi nite. As this idea which we have of it in our own souls will not suffer us to rest in any conception thereof which represents it less than infinite: so neither will it suffer us to conceive of it any other wise than as one simple being : and could we mul tiply understandings into never so vast a number, yet should we be again coUecting and knitting them up together in some universal one. So that if we rightly reflect upon our own minds and the method of their energies, we shall find them to be so framed, as not to admit of any other than one infinite source of all that reason and understanding which themselves partake of, in which they live, move, and have their being. And therefore in the old metaphysical theology, an original and uncreat ed fibmg or unity is made the fountain of aU parti cularities and numbers which have their existence from the efflux of its almighty power. Second, And that is the next thing in which our own understandings wUl instruct us concerning God, viz. his eternal power. For as we find avyill and power within ourselves to execute the results of our ^own reason and judgment, so far as we are not hin dered by some more potent cause : so indeed we 4 AND NATURE OF GOD. 139 know it must be a mighty inward strength and force that must enable our understandings to their proper functions, and that life, energy, and activity can never be separated from a power of understand ing. Themore unbodied any thing is, the more unbounded also is it in its effective power : body and matter being the most sluggish, inert, and un wieldy thing that may be, having no power from itself, nor over itself: and therefore the purest mmd must also needs be the most almighty life and jjpirit; and as it comprehends all things, and sums them up together in its infinite knowledge, so it must also comprehend them all in its own life and power. Besides, when we review our own im mortal souls, and their dependency upon some al mighty mind, we know that we neither did nor could produce ourselves ; and withal know that all that power which lies within the compass of our selves, will serve for no other purpose than to ap ply several pre-existent things one to another, from whence all generations and mutations arise, which are nothing else but the events of different applica tions and complications of bodies that were exist ent before: and therefore that which produced that substantial life and mind by which we know ourselves, must be something much more mighty than we are, and can be no less indeed than omni potent, and must also be the first architect and hrj- fMsogybg of all other beings, and the perpetual sup porter of them. Third, We may also know from the same prin ciples, that anjblnugh^loye, every way commensur ate to that most perfect being, eternally rests in it, which is as strong as that is infinite, and as full of life 140 OF THE EXISTENCE and vigour as that is of perfection. And because it finds no beauty nor loveHness but only in that and the issues thereof, therefore it never does nor can fasten upon any thing else. And therefore the di vinity always enjoys itself and its own infinite per fections, seeing it is that eternal and stable sun of goodness that neither rises nor sets, is neither eclips ed nor can receive any increase of light and beauty. Hence the divine love is never attended with those turbulent passions, perturbations, or wrestlings'within itself, of fear, desire, grief, anger, or any such like, whereby our love is wont to explicate and unfold its affection towards its object. But as the divine love is perpetuaUy most infinitely ardent and potent, so it is always calm and serene, unchangeable, hav ing no such ebbings and flowings, no such diversity of stations and retrogradations as that love hath in us which ariseth from the weakness of our under standings, that do not present things to us always in the same orient lustre and beauty : neither we nor any other mundane thing (all which are in a perpetual flux) are always the same. Besides, though our love may sometimes transport us and violently rend us from ourselves and from all self- enjoyment, yet the more forcible it is, by so much the more it wUl be apt to torment us, whUe it can not centre itself in that which it so strongly endea vours to attract to it ; and when it possesseth most, yet is it always hungry and craving, as Plotinus hath weU expressed it, irdvrore irkrigourai xai irdvrors izgsT, ' it may always be filling itself, but, Hke a leaking vessel, it wUl be always emptying itself again.' Whereas the infinite ardour of the divine love, arising from the unbounded perfection of, the AND NATURE OF GOD. 141 divine being, always rests satisfied within itself, and so may rather be defined by a ardaig than a xivriatg, and is wrapt up and rests in the same central unity in which it first begins. And therefore I think some men of latter times have much mistaken the nature of the divine love, in imagining that love is to be attributed to God, as all other passions are, rather secundum effectum than affectum : whereas St. John, who was well acquainted with this noble spirit of love, when he defined God by it, and calls him Love, meant not to signify a bare nothing known by some effects, but that which was infi nitely such as it seems to be. And we might well spare our labour, when we so industriously endea vour to find something in God that might produce the effects of some other passions in us, which look rather Hke the brats of hell and darkness than the lovely offspring of heaven. Fourth, When we reflect upon all this, which signifies some perfect essence, as a mind, wisdom, understanding, omnipotency, goodness, and the like, we can find no such thing as time or place, or any corporeal or finite properties which arise indeed, not ex plenitudine, but ex inopia entitatis ; we may also know God to be eternal^and omnipresent, not because he fills either place or time, but rather be cause he wanteth neither. That which first begets the notion of time in us, is nothing else but that succession and multiplicity which we find in our own thoughts, which move from one thing to ano ther, as the sun in the firmament is said to walk from one planetary house to another, and to have his several stages to pass by. And therefore where there is no such vicissitude or variety, as there can 142 OF THE EXISTENCE be no sense of time, so there can be nothing of the thing. Proclus hath wittily observed that Saturn, or (as the Greeks called him) Kgbvog, was the first of the hsoi iirixba(btoi or mundane gods, or/ oirou y'evseig, sxsi irgoriyeirai ygbvog, because time is necessarily pre supposed to aH generation, which proceeds by cer tain motions and intervals. This world is indeed a great horologe to itself, and is continually number ing out its own age ; but it cannot lay any sure hold upon its own past revolutions, nor can it ga ther up its infancy and old age, and couple them up together. Whereas an infinitely comprehensive mind hath a simultaneous possession of its own ne ver-flitting life ; and because it finds no succession in its own immutable understanding, therefore it \ cannot find any thing to measure out its own dura* I tion. And as time Hes in the basis of all finite life, whereby it is enabled by degrees to display aU the virtue of its own essence, which it cannot do at once ; so such an eternity lies at the foundation of the divinity, whereby it becomes one " without any shadow of turning,"* as St. James speaks, without any variety or multiplicity within himself, of which all created beings that are carried down in the cur rent of time partake. And therefore the Platonists were wont to attribute Ai»» or eternity to God, not so much because he had neither beginning nor end of days, but because of his immutable and uniform nature, which admits of no such variety of concep tions as all temporary things do : and time they at tributed to all created beings, because .there is a yeveaig or constant generation both of and in their * Jam. 1. 17. AND NATURE OF GOD. 143 essence, by reason whereof we may call any of them, as Proclus tells us, by that borrowed expres sion, 'ivriv xai v'eav ' old and new,' being every mo ment as it were re-produced, and acting something which it did not individually before. Though otherwise they supposed this world, constantly de pending upon the Creator's omnipotency, might from all eternity flow forth from the same power that still sustains it, and which was never less po tent to uphold it than now it is : notwithstanding this piece of it which is visible to us, or at least this scheme or fashion of it, they acknowledged to have been but of a late date. Fifth, Now thus as we conceive of God's eter nity, we may in a correspondent manner apprehend his omnipresence ; « not so much by an infinite ex panse or extension of essence, as by an unlimited power,' as Plotinus hath fitly expressed it, kriirr'eov h\ xai Hirei^pv aurbv ou toj dhie\irriTu ri rou (Aey'sSoug % tou agt^ou, dkka ru dire^ikriirru rrjg huvdpewg. For as nothing Can ever stray out of the bounds, or get out of the reach of an almighty mind and power ; so when we barely think of mind or power, or any thing else most peculiar to the divine essence, we cannot find any of the properties of quantity mix ing themselves with it : . and as we cannot confine it in regard thereof to any one point of the uni verse, so neither can we well conceive it extended through the whole, or excluded from any part of it. It is always some material being that contends for space : bodily parts wUl not lodge together, and the more bulky they are, the more they justle for, room one with another ; as Plotinus teUs us, rdw\v ivrau^a fAsydku iv oyxu, rd he exei iv huvdpei, ' bodily 144 OF THE EXISTENCE beings are great only in bulk, but divine essences in virtue and power.' Sixth, We may in the next place, consider that free dom and liberty which we find in our own souls, which is founded in our reason and understanding ; and this is therefore infinite in God, because there is, nothing that can bound the first mind, or disobey f an almighty power. We must not conceive God | to be the freest agent, because he can do and pre- 1 scribe what he pleaseth, and so set up an absolute \ will wrhich shall make both law and reason, as some \. imagine. For as God cannot know himself to be I any other than what indeed he is ; so neither can he wUl himself to be any thing else than what he ' is, or that any thing else should swerve from those laws which his own eternal nature and understand- ; ing -prescribes to it. For this were to make God free to dethrone himself, and set up a liberty with in him that should contend with the royal preroga tive of his own boundless wisdom. To be short ; when we converse with our own souls, we find the spring of all liberty to be nothing else but reason ; and therefore no unreasonable creature" can "partake of it : and that it is not so much any indifferency in our wUls of determining without reason, much less against it, as the Uberal election of, and complacency in, that which our understandings propound to us as most expedient : I and our, Hberty most appears, when our will most of j all congratulates the results of our own judgments ; and then shows itself most vigorous, when either the particularity of that good, which the under standing converseth with, or the weak knowledge that it hath of it, restrains it not. Then is it most AND NATURE OF GOD. 145 pregnant, and flows forth in the fullest stream, when its object is most fuU, and the acquaintance with it most ample : all liberty in the soul being a kind of liberality in the bestowing of our affections, and the want or scarce measure of it, parsimoniousness. And therefore the more the results of our judg ments tend to an indifferency, the more we find our wiUs dubious and in suspense what to choose ; con trary inclinations arising and falling within inter changeably, as the scales of a balance equally laden with weighfs ; and all this while the soul's liberty is nothing else but a fluctuation between uncertain ties, and languisheth away in the impotency of our understandings. Whereas the divine understanding beholding all things most clearly, must needs beget the greatest freedom that may be ; which freedom, as it is bred in it, so it never moves without the compass of it. And though the divine wiU be not determined always to this or that particular, yet it is never bereft of eternal light and truth to act by: and therefore, though we cannot see a reason for aU God's actions, yet we may know they were neither done against it, nor without it. CHAP. III. How the consideration of those restless motions qf our wills after some supreme and infinite good, leads us into the knowledge of a Deity. VV E shall once more take a view of our own souls, and observe how the motions thereof lead us T 146 OF THE EXISTENCE into the knowledge of a Deity. „ We always find ; a restless appetite within ourselves which craves for some supreme and chief good, and will not be satisfied with any thing less .than infinity itself; as j if our own penury and indigency were commen- \ surate to the divine fulness : and therefore no ques- . tion has been more canvassed by all philosophy \ than this, de summo hominis bono, and all the sects thereof were anciently distinguished by those opinions that they entertained de finibus boni etmali, as Tully phraseth it. But of how weak and dUute a nature soever some of them may have conceived that summum bonum, yet they could not so satisfy their own inflamed thirst after it, We find by ex perience that our souls cannot live upon that thin and spare diet which they are entertained with at their own home ; neither can they be satiated with those jejune and insipid morsels which this out ward world furnisheth their table with. I cannot think the most voluptuous Epicurean could ever satisfy the cravings of his soul wifh corporeal plea sure, though he might endeavour to. persuade him self there' was no better: nor the most quintessen tial Stoics find an aurdgxeia and dragafcia a self-suf ficiency and tranquUlity within their own souls, arising out of the pregnancy of their own mind and reason; though their sullen thoughts would not suf fer them to be beholden to a higher being for their happiness. The more we endeavour to ex tract an autarchy out of our own souls, the more we torment them, and force them to feel and sen- sate their own pinching poverty. Ever since our minds became so dim-sighted as not to pierce into that original and primitive blessedness which is AND NATURE OF GOD. 147 above, our wills are too big for our understandings, and will believe their beloved prey is to be found where reason discovers it not: tliey will pursue it through all the vast wUderness of this world, and force our understandings to follow the chase with them : nor may we think to tame this violent appe tite, or allay the heat of it, except we can look up ward to some eternal and almighty goodness which is alone able to master it. It is not the nimbi eness and agility of our own reason which stirs up these eager affections within us, (for then the most ignorant sort of men would never feel the sting thereof) but indeed some more potent nature which hath planted a restless motion within us that might more forcibly carry us out to itself; and therefore it will never suffer itself to be controUed by any of our thin speculations, or satis fied with those airy delights that our fancies may offer to it : it doth not, it cannot, rest itself any where but upon the centre of some almighty good, some solid and substantial happiness ; like the hun gry child that wiU not be stiUed by all the mother's music, or change its sour and angry looks for her smUing countenance ; nothing will satisfy it but the full breasts. The whole work of this world is nothing but a perpetual contention for true happiness, and men are scattered up and down the world, moving to and fro therein, to seek it. Our souls, by a natural science, as it were, feeling their own original, are perpetually travailing with new designs and contri vances whereby they may purchase the scope of their high ambitions. Happiness is that pearl of price which all adventure for, though few find it. 148 OF THE EXISTENCE tit is not gold or silver that the earthlings of this world seek after, but some satisfying good which they think is there treasured up. Neither is it a little empty breath that ambition and popularity soars after, but some kind of happiness that it thinks to catch and suck in with it. And thus indeed, when men most of aU fly from God, they stiU seek after him. Wicked men pur sue indeed after a deity in their worldly lusts ; wherein yet they most blaspheme ; for God is not a mere empty name or title, but that self-sufficient good wliich brings along with it that rest and peace which they so much seek after, though they do most prodigiously conjoin it with something which it is not, nor can it be, and in a true and real strain of blasphemy, attribute aU that which God is, to something else which is most unlike him, and, as St. Paul speaks of those infatuated GentUes, " turn the glory of the, incorruptible God into the image of corruptible man, of birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things." * God is not better defined to us by our under standings than by our wills and affections : he is not only the 'eternal reason, that "almighty mind and wisdom which our understandings converse with; but he is also that unstained beauty and su preme good after which ouFwills are^erp~etuaTly" aspiring z and wheresoever we find true beauty, h2ve^n^g^^nessrwe""may sayT" here or tfiere"1s GocL- And as we cannot understand any thing of an intelligible nature, but by some primitive idea we have of God, whereby we are able to guess at * Rom. i. 23. AND NATURE OF GOD. 149 the elevation of its being, and the pitch of its per fection ; so neither do, our wills embrace any thing without some latent sense of him, whereby they can taste and discern how near any thing comes to that self-sufficient good they seek after : and, in deed, without such an internal sensating faculty as this is, we should never know when our souls are in conjunction with the Deity, or be able to relish the ineffable sweetness of true happiness. Though here below we know but little what this is, because we are little acquainted with fruition and enjoy ment ; we know well what belongs to longing and languishment, but we know not so well what be longs to plenty and fulness ; we are well acquaint ed with the griefs and sicknesses of this inbred love, but we know not what its health and compla cencies are. To conclude this particular, (leydkag sypi xivriasig h •fyvy/i, the soul hath strong and weighty motions, and nothing else can bear it up but something per manent and immutable. Nothing can beget a con stant serenity and composedness within, but some thing supreme to its own essence; as if having once departed from the primitive fountain of its life, it were deprived of itself, perpetually contesting within itself and divided against itself: and all this evidently proves to our inward sense and feeling, that there is some higher good than ourselves, something that is much more amiable and desir able, and therefore must be loved and preferred before ourselves, as Plotinus hath excellently ob served, rm ovrav exaarov eptefj/svov rou ayaSou, fioukerai ixeivo (jbdkkov ri o ianv slivat, &c. ' every thing that de sires the enjoyment of the first good, would rather 150 OF THE EXISTENCE AND NATURE OF GOD. be that than what it is, because indeed the nature of that is much more desirable than its own.' And therefore the Platonists, when they contemplate the Deity under these three notions of ro sv, rb ov, and rb dyaSbv, and question which to place first in order of understanding, resolve the pre-eminence to be due to the rb dya&bv, as Simplicius tells us, because that is first known to us as the architect of the world, and, we may add, as that which begets in us this sgunxov ird&og, these strong passionate de sires whereby all sorts of men, even those that are rude and illiterate, are first known to themselves, and, by that knowledge, may know what diminu tive, poor, and helpless things they are, who can never be satisfied from themselves, and what an excellent and sovereign goodness there is above them which they ought to serve, and cannot but serve it, or some filthy idol instead of it ; though this mental idolatry be like that gross and external in this also, that howsoever we attend it not (and so are never the more blameless) yet our worship of these images -and pictures of goodness rests not there, it being some all-sufficient good that (as we observed before) calls forth and commands our a- Idorations. DEDUCTIONS AND INFERENCES FROM THE, &C. 151 CHAP. IV. DEDUCTIONS AND INFERENCES FROM THE CONSIDERATION OF THE DIVINE NATURE AND ATTRIBUTES. 1. That all divine productions are the free effluxes qf omnipotent love and goodness. The true notion qf God's glory ; what it is. JHfen very apt to mistake in this point. God-needs not the hap piness or misery of his creatures to make himself glorious, God does most glorify himself by communicating himself: we most glorify God when we most partake qf him, and resemble him most. W E have seen how we may rise up to the under standing of the Deity by the contemplation of our owiv souls : and now it may seem worthy of the best attention of our minds to consider some de ductions and inferences which naturally flow from the true knowledge of the divine nature and attri butes. And the first is this, That all divine productions or operations that terminate in something without him, are nothing else but the free effluxes of his own omnipotent love and goodness, which always moves along with them, and never wiUingly departs from thgrn. When God made^the world, it was not out of a piece of self-interest, as if he had had any de sign to advance himself, or to enlarge his own stock of glory and happiness ; for what beauty or perfec tion can be in this whole creation which was not be fore contained in himself as the free fountain of ali? or what could he see out of himself that could add any thing to his own stature, which he found not already in himself? He made not the world ygiiag evixev, i'va npdg irepg re av^ganrtuv xai zsgbg ^suv 152 DEDUCTIONS AND INFERENCES FROM THE dkkuv xui haipbvwv xagirolro, ohv irgbaohbv r/ra uiro rrjg yev'eaeug o\vu\hevog, ' It was not for any need, or that he might gain some honour to himself from men, archangels or angels, as the tribute or rent to be paid to him from his creation,' as Clemens Alexan- drinus observes out of Plato.* Though I know not how it comes about that some bring in God as it were casting about how he might erect a new monopoly of glory to himself, and so to serve this purpose made the world, that he might have a stock of glory here going in it. And I doubt we are wont sometimes to paint him forth too much in the Hkeness of corrupt and impotent men, that by a fond ambition please themselves and feed their lust ful fancies with their own praises chanted out to them by their admirers ; and another whUe as much sport themselves and applaud their own greatness, to hear what hideous cries the severity of their own power can extort from those they have a mind to make miserable. We all speak much of the glory of God, and en tertain a common belief oF~that being the^bnly end for which we were all made : and I wish we were aU more inwardly moved with a true and lively sense of it. There can be nothing else that either God could propound to himself, or that we ought, if it be rightly understood. But we must not think that God, who is infinite fulness, would seek for any thing without himself: he needs neither our happiness nor our misery, in order to make himself : more ulustrious ; but, being full in himself, it was \ his good pleasure to communicate of his own ful- * Strom. 5. DIVINE NATURE AND ATTRIBUTES. 153 ness : for, as Proclus hath well observed,* irZg iy«g ggw fik'eirei voug av, &c. * How can he look without himself, seeing he is a pure mind, always encom passed with its own glorious brightness ? But the good pleasure of his will being filled with bounty, and the power of a most gracious Deity proceeding from it, HberaUy dispensed themselves, and distri buted those gifts of grace that might make all cre ated being the more to resemble that archetypal idea of themselves.' Accordingly Timaeus Locrus represents the Creator of the world in the same strain that Moses did, ug dyaZppsvog xai slpgav^sig, de lighted as it were in himself to see that all things that he had made Were good, and some things ex ceeding good. God himself being infinitely full, and having enough and to spare, is always over flowing ; and goodness and love issue forth from him by way of redundancy. When he made the world, because there was nothing better than him self, he shadowed forth himself therein, and, as far as might be, was pleased to represent himself and manifest his own eternal glory and perfection in it. When he is said to seek his own glory, it is indeed nothing else but to ray and beam forth, as it were, his own lustre ; as R. Jehuda in his book Cosri hath glanced at it, is-uoi my Svx S^uon ti^k m« ymi -roan gloria ha?c scintilla est lucis divina?, cedens in utilita tem populi ejus in terra ejus. God does then most glorify and exalt himself in the most triumphant way that may be od extra or out oFJEmselfj if I may so phrase it, when he most 6F all communicates himself, and when he erects Lib. IV. in Timseum. U 154 DEDUCTIONS AND INFERENCES FROM THE such monuments of his own majesty, wherein his ISwnTove and goodness may Hve and reign. "And we then most of all glorify him, when we partake most of him, when our serious endeavours of a true assimilation to him, and conformity to his image, declare ffiatTwe think nothing better than he is, and are therefore most ambitious of being one with him, by a universal resignation of ourselves unto him. This is his glory in its lowest humiliation, while it beams forth out of himself; and our happiness in its exaltation, which heaven never separates nor divides, though earth doth. His honour is his love and goodness in paraphrase, spreading itself over all those that can or do receive it; and this he loves arid cherishes wheresoever he finds it, as something of himself therein. Thus I should leave this particular, but that being gone so far in it, it may be worth the whUe to take notice of three things wherein God most of all glo ries and takes the greatest complacency, in refer ence to creatures, as they are laid down by Proclus, * fLbpgaivsrai fuv irgurag xara rrjv svhov saurou vbriatv, dirkrj xaidvs(/,irohiaruxaid^tgba iregtQokrj irav rb vorjrbv irs- gika/jjQavouari, ' The first, and chiefest, is concurrent with his own internal vision of aU things in that simple, expedite and simultaneous comprehension of aU things inteUigible, piercing through all their essences, and viewing them all in himself, he is de- Hghted therein, as seeing how his own glory can display and imitate itself in outward matter.' - The second is, hid rnv iirirrjheibrrira rm urroheyptmon rriv 'i& * Lib. IV. in Tiir. I. 7 DIVINE NATURE AND ATTRIBUTES. 155 irgo'iouaav aurou rSv dya&avyjogriyittv; 'in the aptness and capacity of those things which he hath made to receive a further influence of good, ready to stream forth from himself into them. The last is, b rrj i% dy{poiv auppsrgia, xai uaavsi aupirvoia xai auf/>- paivia, ' in the sweet symmetry of his own forms with this capacity, and as it were the harmonious conspiration and symphony of them, when his own ' Hght pleasantly plays upon those well tuned instru ments which he hath fitted to run the descants of his own goodness upon.' And therefore it becomes us whom he hath endued with vital power of action, aMin "some sense a self-moving life, to stir up his good gifts within ourselves ; and, if we would have himVtake pleasure in us, to prepare our own souls more"arici more to receive of. his liberality, .'iva f«? agyjj sig h[bdg jf row Jhou hbaig, that the stock which he is pleased to impart to us may not lie dead within us. And this is the appHcation which he makes of this particular. CHAP. V. A SECOND DEDUCTION. 2. Tliat all things are supported and governed by an almighty wisdom and goodness, An answer to an objection made against the divine providence from an unequal distribution qf things here below. Such quarrelling with providence ariseth from a pedan tic and carnal notion qf good and evil. ±N the next place, we may, by way of further de duction, gather, That that almighty wisdom arid good- 1 156 DEDUCTIONS AND INFERENCES FROM THE ness which first made all things, doth also perpetually conserve and govern them; extending themselves through the whole fabric, and seating themselves in every finite essence, tvu pr} puybvra rb Seiov rekeug draxra y'evnrat, (as the same philosopher expresseth it) 'lest, straggling and falling off from the Deity, they should become altogether disorderly,' relapsing and sHding back into their first chaos. As in all motion there must be some first mover, from whence the beginning and perpetuation of all motion is de duced : so in beings there must be some first es sence upon which all other must constantly depend. And therefore the Pythagorean phUosophy was wont to look upon these v'ea hnpmugyriyjara, as they call this production of every thing that is not truly divine, wg dei iv yev'eaet, as being always in fieri. For as no finite thing can subsist by its own strength, or take its place upon the stage of space without the leave of an almighty and supreme power : so neither can it remain here without licence and as sistance from it. The Deity indeed is the centre of all finite being, and entity itself, which is self- sufficient, must of necessity be the foundation and basis of every one of these weak essences, which cannot bear up themselves by any central power of their own ; as we may also be almost assured of, from a sensible feeling of all the constant muta tions and impotency which we find both in ourselves and all other things. And as God thus preserves all things, so he is continually ordering and disposing aU things in the best way, and providing so as may be best for them. He did not make the world as a mere exercise of his almighty power, or to try his own strength, and DIVINE NATURE AND ATTRIBUTES. 157 then throw it away from himself without any fur-( 'f-7% ther attention to it ; for he is that omnipresent Hfelx^.. that penetrates and runs through aU things, con-i taining and holding all fast together within him self; and therefore the ancient philosophy was wont rather to say, that the world was in God, than that God was in the worldT~TletilHTuoTiook with- out HmieTFtcT search for some solid foundation that might bear up this weighty building, but indeed reared it up within him, and spread his own omni- potency under it and through it : and being cen trally in every part of it, he governs it according to the prescript of his own unsearchable wisdom and goodness, and orders aU things for the best. And this is one principal orthodox point the Stoics would have us to believe concerning providence, on irdvra uir dgiarou vou yiverai, ' that all things are here done in this world by the appointment of the best mind.' And now, if any should quarrel with the unequal djsjtribjution of things here, as if rather some blind fortune had bestowed her blessings carelessly tiU she had no more left, and thereby made so many standings, rather than some all-knowing mind that deals forth its bounty in due proportions ; I should send them to Plutarch and Plotinus to have their reasons fully satisfied in this point, (for we here deal with the principles of natural light) all these \ debates arising from nothing but pedantical and| carnal notions of good and^eyil : as if it were so! gaUant a thing to be dealing with crowns and scep tres, to be bravely arrayed, and wallow in that| which is called the wealth of this world. God in- i deed never took any such notice of good men as to 158 DEDUCTIONS AND INFERENCES FROM THE make them all rulers, as the last of those fore- cited authors tells us ;* neither was it worth the while, ouhe ^te^irbv roug dvhgag dya&oug dkkov (Ziov ZSvrag rbv agyjjg uv'Stgairivrig dfieiva), rouroug auruv dgyjov- rag ehai, * neither is it fit for good men that par take of a higher life than the most princely is, to trouble themselves about lording and ruling over other men ;' as if such a splendid kind of nothing as this is, were of so much worth. It may be generally much better for us, while we are so apt to magnify and court any mundane beauty and glory, as we are, that providence should disorder and deface these things, that we might all be weaned from the love of them, than that their lovely looks should so bewitch and en chant our souls as to draw them off from better things. And I dare say, that a sober mind that shall contemplate the state and temper of men's minds, and the confused frame of this outward world, wul rather admire the infinite wisdom of a gracious providence in permitting and ordering that ataxy which is in it, than he would were it to be beheld in a more comely frame and order. * riotin. Enn. III. Lib. ii. cap. 9, DIVINE NATURE AND ATTRIBUTES, 159 CHAP. VI. A THIRD DEDUCTION. 3. That all true happiness consists in a participation qf God, aris ing out qf the assimilation and conformity qf our souls to him ; and, that the most real misery ariseth out qf the apostacy of souls from God. No enjoyment of God without our being made like to him. The happiness and misery qf man defined and stated, with the original and foundation qf both. VV E proceed now to another deduction or infe rence, viz. That all true happiness consists in a par ticipation of God, arising out of the assimilation and conformity of our souls to him ; and, that the most real misery ariseth out of tlie apostacy of souls from God. And so we are led to speak of the rewards and punishments of the life to come, pra?mium and poena, vssn "w» as the Jewish writers are wont to express them : and it will not be any hard labour from what hath been said, to find out the original and nature of both of them ; and though perhaps we cannot dive into the bottom of them, yet we may go about them, and tell how in a general way to define and distinguish them. Happiness is nothing else, as we usuaUy describe it to ourselves, but the enjoyment of some chief good : and therefore the Deity is so boundlessly happy, because it is every way one with its own immense perfection ; and every thing so much the more feehngly Hves upon happiness, by how much the more it comes to partake of God, and to be made like to him : and therefore the Platonists well defined it to consist in idea boni. And, as it is im- \ 160 DEDUCTIONS AND INFERENCES FROM THE possible to enjoy happiness without a fruition of God ; so it is impossible to enjoy him without an assimilation and conformity of our natures to him in a way of true goodness and godlike perfection. It is a common maxim of Socrates, (a>i xa^agu xa§- agou ipdirrea^ai jtwj ou Ssfitrbv rj, ' it is not lawful for any impure nature to touch pure divinity.' For we cannot enjoy God by any external conjunction with him : divine fruition is not by a mere kind of apposition or contiguity of our natures with the di vine, but it is an internal union, whereby a divine spirit informing our souls, sends the strength of a divine life through them ; and as this is more strong and active,"" so is happiness itself more energetical within us. It must be some divine efflux running quite through our souls, awakening and exalting all the vital powers of them into an active sympathy with some absolute good, that renders us complete ly blessed. It is not to sit gazing upon a deity by some thin speculations ; but it is an inward feeling and sensation of this mighty goodness displaying itself within us, melting our fierce and furious na tures, that would fain be something in contradic tion to God, into a universal compliance with itself, and wrapping up our amorous minds wholly into itself, whereby God comes to be all in all to us. And therefore, so long as our wills and affections endeavour to fix upon any thing but God and true goodness, we do but indeed anxiously endeavour to wring happiness out of something that will yield no more than a flinty rock to all our pressing and for cing. The more we endeavour to force out our af fections to stay and rest themselves upon any finite thing, the more violently will they recoil, back again DIVINE NATURE AND ATTRIBUTES. lGl upon us. It is only a tine sense and relish of God that can tame and master that rage of our insatiable and restless desires, which is still forcing us out of ourselves to seek some perfect good, that which, from a latent sense of our own souls, we feel our selves to want. The foundation of heaven and hell is laid in men's own souls, in an ardent and vehement appetite after happiness, which can neither attain to it, nor miss finally of it and of all appearances of it, without a quick and piercing sense. Our souls are not like so many lumps of dead and senseless matter to a true living happiness ; they are not like these dull clods of earth which discern not the good or ill sa vour of those plants that grow upon them. Gain and loss are very sensibly felt by greedy minds. The soul of man was made with such a large capa city as it is, that so it might be better fitted to en tertain a full and liberal happiness, that the divine love and goodness might more freely spread itself in it, and unite it to itself. And accordingly, when it misseth of God, it must feel so much the more the fury and pangs of misery, and find a severe Nemesis arising out of its guilty conscience, which, Hke a fiery scorpion, will fasten its stings within it. And thus as heaven, love, joy, peace, serenity, and j all that which happiness is, buds and blossoms out of holy and godlike spirits : so also hell and misery will perpetually spring out of impure minds, dis tracted with envy, maHce, ambition, self-will, or any inordinate loves to any particular thing. This is that 'Ahgaarsiag vopog that Plato speaks of, that fatal law that is first made in heaven's consis tory, ' that purity and holiness shall be happy, and x 162 DEDUCTIONS AND INFERENCES FROM THE all vice and sin miserable.' Holiness of mind will be more and more attracting God to itself, as all vice wiU lapse and slide more and more from him. \The more pure our souls are, and abstracted from all mundane things, the more sincerely will they (endeavour the nearest union that may be with God, jthe more they will pant and breathe after him alone, leaving the chase of any other delight. There is such a noble and free-born spirit in true goodness seated in immortal natures, as will not be satisfied merely with innocency, nor rest itself in this mixed bodily state, though it could converse with bodily things without sinking to a vicious love of them ; | but. would always be returning to a more intimate | union with that Being from whence it came, and which will be drawing it more and more to itself : and therefore it seems very reasonable to beHeve that, if Adam had continued in a state of innocen cy, he should have been raised by God to a greater fruition of him, and his nature should have been elevated to a more transcendent condition. And, if there was any covenant made with Adam in Pa radise, I think we cannot understand it in any other sense but this : the Scripture speaks not of any other terms between God and man. And the law of life, which we have spoken of, is eternal and im mutable; nor does the dispensation of grace by Christ Jesus at aU abrogate or disannul, but rather | enforce it: for so we find that the law of Christ, that which he gave out to all his disciples, was the law of perfection that carries true happiness along jjin the sense of it, which, asthe great prince of souls, |he dispenseth by his eternal Spirit in^JvuQ^way funto the minds of men. DIVINE NATURE AND ATTRIBUTES. J 63 CHAP. VII. A FOURTH DEDUCTION. 4. Tke fourth deduction acquaints us with the true notion qf the divine justice, That the proper scope and design of it, is to pre serve righteousness, to promote and encourage true goodness. That it does not primarily intend punishment, but only takes it up as a mean to prevent transgression. True justice never sup plants any that itself may appear more glorious in their ruins. How divine justice is most advanced. AN the fourth place, we may further collect how to state rightly the notion of the divine justice, the scope whereof is nothing else but to assert and establish eternal law and right, and to preserve the integrity thereof ; it is no design of vengeance, which, though God takes on wicked men, yet he delights not in it. The divine justice first pre scribes that which is most conformable to the di vine nature, and mainly pursues the conservation of righteousness. We would not think him a good! ruler that should give out laws to ensnare his sub jects, with an even indifferency of mind whether his laws be kept, or punishment suffered ; but such a one who would make the best security for right and equity by wholesome laws, and annexing jDumsb- ' ments as a mean to prevent transgression, and not to manifest severity. The proper scope of justice seemsToTDe nothing else but the preserving and maintaining that which is just and right : the scope of that justice which is in any righteous law, is pro perly to provide for a righteous execution of that which is just and fit to be, without intending pun- 164 DEDUCTIONS AND INFERENCES FROM THE ishment ; for to intend that properly and directly, might rather seem cruelty than justice : and there fore justice takes not up punishment, but only for securing the performance of righteous laws, viz. a either for the amendment of the person transgress- I ing, or a due example to others to keep them off | from transgression. For I would here suppose a good and righteous man, who, in some desolate place of the world, should have the command of a hundred more, and himself be supreme and under no command. He prescribes laws to this company, makes it death for any one to take away another's life. But now one proves a murderer, kUls one of his fellows ; afterwards repents heartily, and is like to prove useful among the rest of his fellows : they all are so heartily affected one to another, that there is no danger, upon sparing this penitent's life, that any one of them should be encouraged to commit the like evil. The case being thus stated, it wiU not seem difficult to conclude that the justice of this righteous and good commander would spare this poor penitent : for his justice would have pre served that life which is lost, and seeing there is nothing further that it can obtain in taking away this, it will save this which may be saved ; for it affects not any blood ; and when it destroys, it is out of necessity, to take away a destructive person, and to give example, which in the case stated faUs not out. Again, jiistice is the justice of .gftgdjasss, and so cannot delight to punish ; it aims at nothing more than the maintaining and promoting the laws of goodness, and hath always some good end before it, DIVINE NATURE AND ATTRIBUTES. 165 and therefore would never punish except some fur ther good were in view. True justice never supplants any that itself might appear more glorious in their ruins ; for this would be to make justice love something better than right eousness, and to advance and magnify itself in something which is not itself) but rather an aberra tion from itself: and therefore God himself so ear nestly contends with the Jews about the equity of his own ways, with frequent asseverations that his justice is thirsty after no man's blood, but rather that sinners would repent, turn from their evil ways, and Hve. And then justice is most advanced, when the contents of it are fulfilled ; and though it does not, and wUl not, acquit the guilty without repent ance, yet the design of it is to encourage innocency, and promote true goodness. 166 DEDUCTIONS AND INFERENCES FROM "THE CHAP. VIII. THE FIFTH AND LAST DEDUCTION. 5. That seeing there is such an intercourse and society, as it were, between God and men, therefore there is also some law between them, which is the bond qf all communion. The primitive rules qf God's economy in this world, not the sole results qf an abso lute will, but the sacred decrees qf reason and goodness. God could not design to make us sinful or miserable. Of the law qf nature embosomed in man's soul. How it obliges man to love and obey God, and to express a godlike spirit and life. in this world. All souls the offspring qf God ; but holy souls manifest tluiik- selves lo be, and are more peculiarly, the children qf God. . JL HE former deduction leads me to another akin to it, which shall be my last, and it is that which Tully intimates in his De Legibus, viz. That seeing there is such an intercourse and society as it were be tween God and men, therefore there is also some law between them, which is the bond of all communion. God himself, from whom all law takes its rise and emanation, is not exlex and without all law, nor, in a sober sense, above it. Neither are the primitive rules of his economy in this world the sole results , of an absolute will, but the sacred decrees of rea- J son and goodness. I cannot think God to be so unbounded in his legislative power, that he can make every thing law, both for his own dispensa tions and our observance, that we may sometime imagine. We cannot say, indeed, that God was absolutely determined from some law within him self to make us ; but I think we may safely say, DIVINE NATURE AND ATTRIBUTES. 167 when he had once determined to make us, he could neither make us sinful, seeing he had no idea nor shadow of evU within himself, nor wrap up those dreadful fates within our natures, or set them over us, that might arcana inspiratione (as some are pleased to phrase it) secretly work our ruin, and si lently carry us on, making use of our own natural infirmity, to eternal misery. Neither could he de- 1 sign to make his creatures miserable, that so he \ might show himself just. These are rather the by- ' ways of cruel and ambitious men, that seek their own advantage in the mischiefs of other men, and contrive their own rise by their ruins : this is not divine justice, but the cruelty of degenerated men. But, as the divinity could propound nothing to itself in the making of the world, but the commu nication of its own love and goodness ; so it can never swerve from the same scope and end in the dispensation of itself to it. Neither did God so boundlessly enlarge the appetite of souls after some all-sufficient good, that so they might be the more unspeakably tortured in the missing of it ; but that they might more certainly return to the original of their beings. And such busy-working essences as the souls of men are, could neither be made as dull and senseless of true happiness as stocks and stones J are, neither could they contain the whole sum andf perfection of it within themselves : therefore they' must also be informed with such principles as might conduct them back again to him from whom they first came. God does not make creatures," for the mere sport of his almighty arm, to raise and ruin, and toss up and down at mere pleasure. No, that euhoxia or good pleasure of that will that made them 168 DEDUCTIONS AND INFERENCES FROM THE is the same still, it changes not, though we may change, and make ourselves incapable of partaking the blissful fruits and effects of it. And so we come to consider that law embosomed in the souls of men which ties them again to their Creator, "arid this iT called the law of nature; which indeed is nothing else but a paraphrase or comment upon the nature of God, as it copies forth itself in the soul of man. Because God is the first mind and the first good, propagating an imitation of himself in such immor tal natures as the souls of men are ; therefore ought the soul to renounce all mortal and mundane things, and preserve its affections chaste and pure for God himself; to love him with a most universal and un bounded love ; to trust in him and reverence him ; to converse with him in a free and cheerful manner, as one " in whom we live, and move, and have our being ;"* being perpetuaUy encompassed by him, and never moving out of him ; to resign all our ways and wiUs up to him with an equal and indif ferent mind, as knowing that he guides and governs aU things in the best way ; to sink ourselves as low in humility, as we are in self-nothingness. And because all those scattered rays of beauty and loveliness which we behold spread up and down over all the world^se only the emanations of that inexhausted light which js above ; therefore should we love them all in that, and climb up always by those sunbeams unto the eterha| Father of lights : we should look upon him, and take from him the pattern of our lives, and always eyeing him, should * Acts xvii. 28. DIVINE NATURE AND ATTRIBUTES. 169 dydkfAara Seia rexraiveiv, &c. (as Hierocles speaks) \ ' poHsh and shape our souls into the clearest resem- } blance of him ;' and in all our behaviour in this f world (that great temple of his) deport ourselves decently and reverently, with that humility, meek ness, and modesty, that becomes his house. We ' should endeavour more and more to be perfect, as he is ; in all our dealings with men, doing good, showing mercy and compassion, advancing justice and righteousness, being always full of charity and good works ; and lo6^ upon ourselves as having nothing to do here but\p display and blazon the glory of our heavenly Father, and frame our hearts and lives according to that pattern which we behold in the mount of a holy contemplation of him. Thus we should endeavour to preserve that heavenly fire of the divine love and goodness (which issuing forth from God centres itself within us, and is the protoplastic virtue of our being) always alive and burning in the temple of our souls, and to sa crifice ourselves back again to him. And, when "we" rumTtliis "royal law arising but of the heart of eternity, then shall we here appear to be "the chil dren of God,"* when he thus lives in us, as our Saviour speaks. And so we shall close up this par- j ticular with that high privilege which immortal I souls are invested with : they are all thejaffspringf of God, for so St. Paul allows the heathen poet to calTtKem :t they are all royally descended, and have no father but Go JTu^seTfT being originally formed into his image and likeness ; and when they express the purity and holiness of the divine life in * Matt. v. 15. f Acts. xvij. 28. 170 DEDUCTIONS AND INFERENCES FROM THE, &C. being perfect as God is perfect, then they manifest themselves to be his children.* And Christ en- courageth men to seek and pray for the Spirit,t (which is the best gift that God can give to men) because he is their heavenly Father, much more bountiful and tender to aU helpless souls that seek to him, than any earthly parent, whose nature is degenerated from that primitive goodness, can be to his children. But those apojrtate„_§piats that know not to return to the original of their beings, but implant themselves into some other stock, and seek to incorporate and unite themselves to another line by sin and wickedness, cfekt themselves off from this divine privUege, and lose trWr own birthright; they do peraQaiveiv elg dkko y'evog, (if I may borrow that phrase) and lapse into another nature. All this was well expressed by Proclus, t iraaai ¦J/uylai SeSiv iraihsg, akk' ou iraaai rbv sauruv iir'syvaaav Sebv at he iiriyvouaai xai rnv bpoiav ekbpevai Zprjv, xukouvrui SeSiv iraihsg, ' all souls are the children of God, but all of them know riot their God ; but such as know him and live like to him, are called the chil dren of God.' CHAP. IX. AN APPENDIX CONCERNING THE REASON OF POSITIVE LAWS. JjUT here, as an appendix to the two former de ductions, it may be of good use to inquire into the * Matth. v. 48. f Mattb. vii. 11. f Lib. IV. in Timieum. 4 CONCERNING THE REASON OF POSITIVE LAWS. 171 reason of such laws as we call positive, which God hath in all times, as is commonly supposed, enjoin ed obedience to ; which are not the eternal dictates and decretals of the divine nature communicating itself to immortal spirits, but rather deduce their original from the free will and pleasure of God. To solve this difficulty, that of St. Paul may seem a fit medium, who teUs us, " The law was added because of transgression ;"* though I doubt not but he means thereby the moral law, as well as any other. The true intent and scope of these positive laws, (and it may be of such an external promul gation of the moral) seems to be nothing else but this, to secure the eternal law of righteousness from transgression. As the Jews say of their decreta sapientum, that they were min"? T13 ' a hedge to the law ;' so we may say of these divine decre tals, they were but cautionary and preventive of disobedience to that higher law : and therefore St. Paul teUs us why the moral law was made such a political business by an external promulgation, &c. not so much because of righteous men, in whom the law of nature Hves, who perform the rd tou vbpov without any outward law, but it was given "for the lawless and disobedient," &c.t And therefore 1 doubt not but we may safely conclude, that God gave not those positive laws merely pro imperio, if I may use that expression ; it was not merely to manifest his absolute dominion and sove reignty, as some think, but for the good of those that were enjoined to obey ; and this belief Moses endeavours almost throughout the whole book of * Gal. iii. 19. f 1 Tim. i. 9. 172 CONCERNING THE REASON OF POSITIVE LAWS. Deuteronomy to strengthen the Israelites in : and therefore God was so ready upon aU occasions to dispense with these laws, and requires the Jews to omit the observance of them, when they might seem to justle with any other law of moral duty or human necessity, as may be observed in many instances in scripture. But, for a more distinct unfolding of this point, we may take notice of this difference in the notion of good and evU, as we are to converse with them. Some things are so absolutely, and some things are so only relatively. That which is absolutely good, is every way superior to us, and we ought always to be commanded by it, because we are made under it : but that which is relatively good to us, may sometime be commanded by us. Eternal truth and righteousness are in themselves perfectly and abso lutely good, and the more we conform ourselves to them, the better we are. But those things that are only good relatively and in order to us, we may say of them, that they are so much the better, by how much the more they are conformed to us, I mean, by how much the more they are accommodated and fitted to our estate and condition, and may be fit means to help and promote us in our pursuit of some higher good : arid such indeed is the matter of all positive laws, and thejymbolical or ritual partjjf religion. And, as we are made for the former, viz. what is~absolutely good, to serve that ; so are these latter made for us, as our Saviour hath taught us, when he tells us that " the sabbath was made for man, and not man for the sabbath :"* and, as sin- * Mark. ii. 27. OF THINGS ABSOLUTELY GOOD, &C. 173 cere and real Christians grow up towards true per fection, the less need have they of positive pre cepts or external helps. Yet I doubt it is nothing else but a -waxitonfastus and proud temper of spirit in our times that makes so many talk of being above ordinances, who, if their own arrogance and pre sumption would give them leave to lay aside the flattering glass of their own self-love, would find themselves to have most need of them. What 1 have observed concerning the things ab solutely good, I conceive to be included in that D^oViy pis mentioned Dan. ix. 24. " everlasting righteousness," which the prophet there saith should be " brought in" and advanced by Messiah : this htxatoauvn almiog is the righteousness which is of an eternal and immutable nature, as being a conform ity with eternal and unchangeable truth. For there is a righteousness which thus is not eternal, but po sitive, and at the pleasure of God that dictates it : and such was the righteousness which Christ said " it became him to fulfil" when he was baptized ;* there was no necessity that any such thing should become due. But the foundation of this everlast ing righteousness is something unalterable. To speak more particularly, That the highest good should be loved in the highest degree ; that de- . pendent creatures, that borrow all they have from God, should never glory in themselves, or admire themselves, but ever admire and adore that unbound ed goodness which is the source of their being, and all the good they partake of; that we should al ways do that which is just and right, according to * Matt. iii. IS. 174 HOW OUR KNOWLEDGE OF GOD COMES TO BE the measure we would others should do with us : these, and some other things which a rectified rea son will easily supply, are immutably true and righteous ; so that it never was nor can be true, that they are unnecessary. And whoso hath his heart moulded into a delight in such a righteous ness and the practice thereof, hath this eternal right eousness brought into his soul, which righteous ness is also true and real, not like that imaginary external righteousness of the law, in which the Pharisees boasted. CHAP. X. The conclusion qf this treatise, concerning the existence and nature ' of God, showing how our knowledge qf God comes to be so im perfect in this state, while we are here in this terrestrial body. Two ways observed by Plotinus, whereby this body does preju dice the soul in her operations. That the better philosophers and more contemplative Jews did not deny the existence qf all kind qf body in the other state. Wliat meant by Zoroaster's i/Sukov •\[/u%?J£. What kind qf knowledge qf God cannot be attained to in this life. What meant by flesh and blood, 1 Cor. xv. 50. X OR the concluding of this discourse, as a man tissa to what hath been said, we shaU a little consi der how inconsistent a thing a perfect knowledge of God is with this mundane and corporeal state in which we are here. " While we are in the body, SO IMPERFECT IN THIS STATE. 175 we are absent from the Lord,"* as St. Paul speaks, and that, I think, without a mystery : such bodies as ours are, being fitted for an animal state, and pieces of this whole machina of sensible matter, are perpetuaUy drawing down our souls, when they would raise up themselves by contemplation of the Deity ; and the caring more or, less for the things of this body, so exercises the soul in this state, that it cannot attend upon God dirsgiardaraig without distrac tion. In the ancient metaphysics, such a body as this which we carry about us, is called dvrgov, arnkaiov, &c. ' the dark den and sepulchre in which souls are imprisoned and entombed,' with many other expres sions of the like importance ; and Proclus tells us that the commoration of the soul in such a body as this, is, according to the common vote of antiquity, nothing else but xaratfxnvaaig iv irshiai kn^nSt ' a dweU- ing or pitching its tabernacle in the valley of obli vion and death.' But Plotinus, t in his irsgi rrjg slg rd ad/para xuSbhou rrjg i^uy/is, seems not to be easily satisfied with aUegorical descriptions, and therefore, searching more strictly into this business, tells his own and their meaning in plainer terms, that this body is an occasion of evil to the soul two ways ; 1. on rb i\/jirhhiov irgbg rag vorjaeig yivsrai, as it hinders its mental operations, presenting its idola specus continually to it : 2. on nhovav xai iirStupiuv xai ku- iruv iripirknaiv aurrjv, as it caUs forth its advertency to its own passions, which whUe it exerciseth it self about too earnestly, it faUs into a sinful inor dinacy. Yet did not the Platonists, nor the more contem- * 2 Cor. v. 6, f En'1, Iv> ^ib. viii. 176 HOW OUR KNOWLEDGE OF GOD COMES TO BE plative Jews, deny the existence of aU kind of bo dy in the other state, as if there should be nothing residing there but naked souls totaUy divested of all corporeal essence ; for they held that the soul should in the other world be united with a body, not such a one as it did act in here, which was not without disturbance, but such as should be most agreeable to the soul, which they called irvsupan- xbv oy/ipa rrjg -^uy/ig, ' the spiritual vehicle of the soul,' and by Zoroaster it was called s'ihukov 4'VXSih * a kind of umbra or aereal mantle in which the soul wraps herself,' which, he said, remained with her in the state of glory, "Etrn xai slhuka u,sgig sig rb- irov dfjitpipdovra' and in the Jewish language it is nwsn iffiabn indumentum quoddam interius, as Gaul- min hath observed in his De Vita et Morte Mosis. But to return ; the Platonists have pointed out a threefold knowledge of God, first, xar iiriarnpnh second, xara vbnaiv, lastly, xard iragouaiav and this last they affirmed to be unattainable by us, it being that ineffable Hght whereby the Divinity compre hends its own essence, penetrating all that immen sity of being which itself is. The first may be at tained to in this life ; but the second, in its full perfection, we cannot reach in this life, because this knowledge ariseth out of a blissful union with God himself, which therefore they are wont to call iirapnv rou vonrou, ' a contact of intellectual being,' and sometimes uuropdveiav or iirtfiokw auroirnxnv, that is, that I may phrase it in the scripture words, ' a beholding of God face to face,'* which is that cmoti no arcanum facierum the Jewish writers speak * I Cor. xiii. 12. SO IMPERFECT IN THIS STATE. 177 of, which we cannot attain to while we continue in this concrete and bodily state. And so when Mo ses desired to behold the face of God, that is, as the Jews * understand it, that a distinct idea of the divine essence might be imprinted upon his mind, God told him, " No man can see me, and live ;'* t that is, no man in this corruptible state is capable of attaining to this auropdvsia or visio facierum as Maimonides expounds it, «m »nn a-i«n njna na iw laiisrsui *)un-oin» 'the understanding ofthe living man, who is compounded of body and soul, is utterly un able clearly to apprehend the divine essence, to see it as it is.' And so St. Paul distinguisheth the know ledge of this life as taken in this complex sense, and of the Hfe to come : that " now we see hi sa'oir- rgou in a glass," which is continually sulfied and darkened, while we look into it, by the breathing of our animal fancies, passions, and imaginations upon it ; and b alviypan darkly : " but we shall see then irgbaairov irgbg irgbaairov face to face ;" X which is the translation of the Hebrew phrase o:s Ss cms. And in the like manner does a Greek philosopher compare these two sorts of knowledge which the soul hath of God in this life and in that to come, Tous eiriarri\hovixoug kbyoug (AuSovg nynasrat avvouaa ru irargi xai suveanu^bn rnv dkn^eiav rou ovrog, xai iv auyn xadagu, ' The soul wUl reckon all this knowledge of God" which we have here by way of science but like a fable or parable, when once it is in conjunction with the Father, feasting upon truth itself, and be holding God in the pure rays of his own divinity.' I shall conclude all with that which St. Paul ex- * Maimon. de Fundam. Legis, cap. 1. f Exod. xxxiii. 20. f 1 Cor. xiii. 12. Z 178 HOW OUR KNOWLEDGE OF GOD, &C pressly tells us, " flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God ;" * where, by " flesh and blood," he seems to mean nothing else but man in this com plex and compounded state of soul and body, I mean corruptible, earthy body : and it was a com mon periphrasis of this uvSguirog 6 irokug amongst the Jews, cm iao : in the like sense is o-ag| xai aipita, " flesh and blood," in those and other places in the New Testament used, where this phrase occurs, viz. Matth. xvi. 17- Gal. i. 16. Ephes. vi. 12. Heb. ii. 14. But in opposition to this gross earthy body, the apostle speaks of aZpu irvsvpanxov, " a spiritual body," ver. 44. such as shall " put on incorruption and immortality," ver. 53. and consequently differ4. ing from that body which here makes up this com pounded animal being: and accordingly our Sa viour speaks of " the chUdren of the resurrection," that " they neither marry nor are given in marriage^ nor can they die any more, but are iadyyskoi," t or, as it is in St. Matthew and Mark, ag dyyskoi rou 9sou, " as the angels of God ;" artd so the Jewish writers are wont to use the same phrase to express the state of glory by, viz. that then good men shall be ias6toa r-nipn sicut angeli ministerii. * 1 Cor. xv. 50. f Luke xx. 36. PROPHECY : A DISCOURSE TREATING OF The nature of prophecy — The different degrees of the prophe tical spirit. — The difference of prophetical dreams from all other dreams recorded in Scripture — The difference of the true prophetical spirit from enthusiastical imposture. — What the meaning of those actions is that are frequently in Scrip ture attributed to the prophets, whether they were real or only imaginary. — The schools of the prophets The sons, or disciples of the prophets — The dispositions antecedent and preparatory to prophecy. — The periods of time when the pro phetical spirit ceased in the Jewish and Christian churches. — Rules for the better understanding of prophetical writ. For prophecy came not in. obi time by the will of man ; but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. 2 Pet. i. 21 . Tlgnpirns ?J/o» fit-'* •&&•» £of : and therefore we may have as certain and in fallible a way of being acquainted with the one, as I with the other. And God having so contrived the nature of our souls, that we may converse one with another, and inform one another of things we knew not before, would not make us so deaf to his di- OF PROPHECY. 183 vine voice that breaks the rocks, and rends the( mountains asunder ; he would not make us so un- disciphnable in divine things, as that we should not be capable of receiving any impressions from him self of those things which we were before unac-J quainted with. And this way of communicating truth to the souls of men is originally nothing else ' but prophetical or enthusiastical ; and so we may take notice of the general nature of prophecy. Though I would not all this while be mistaken, as if I thought no natural truth might be by the means of prophetical influence awakened within us, and cleared up to us, or that we could not lumine prophetico behold the ' truths of natural inscrip tion;' for, indeed, one main end and scope of the prophetical spirit seems to be the quickening up of our minds to a more lively converse with those eternal truths of reason, which commonly lie bu ried in so much fleshly obscurity within us, that we discern them not. And therefore the Scripture treats not only of those pieces of truth which are the results of God's free counsels, but also of those which are most akin and allied to our own under standings; and that in the greatest way of conde scension that may be, speaking to the weakest sort of men in the most vulgar sort of dialect : which it may not be amiss to take a little notice of. Divine truth hath its humiliation and exinanitiqn, as well as its exaltation. Divine_ ti'Uth becomes ' manyJjuneTin Scripture incarnate, debasing itself to assume our rude conceptions, that so it might - converse" moje^gely with_ us, and infuse its own divinity into us. God having been pleased herein to~~manifest himself not more jealous of his own 184 OF PROPHECY. Tos non habemus aures, sicutJDeus habet linguqm.^ If he should speak in the language of eternity, who could mi^^Hnirnuri, or interpret his meaning ? or if he should have declared his truth to us only in a way of the purest abstraction that human souls are capable of, how should then the more rude and illiterate sort of men have been able to apprehend it ? Truthsis content, when it conies into the world, to wear ourma^ti^es, to learn our language, to con form itself as it weft* to our dress and fashions : it affects not that state or fastus which the disdainful rhetorician sets out his style withal, non Tarentinis aut Siculis ha?c scribimus ; but it speaks with the most idiotical sort of men in the most idiotical way, and becomes all things to aU men, as every son of truth should do, for their good. Which was well observed in that old cabalistical axiom among the Jews, lumen supernum nunquam descendit sine indu menta. And therefore, it may be, the best way to understand the true sense and meaning of the Scrip ture is not rigidly to examine it upon phUosophical interrogatories, or to bring if under the scrutiny of school definitions and distinctions. It speaks not to us so much in the tongue of the learned sophies of the world, as in the plainest and most vulgar di alect that may be. Which the Jews constantly ob served and took notice of, and therefore it was one common rule among them for a true understanding ofthe Scripture, dim 131 fM^l mm rmnrr lex loquitur lingua filiorum hominum. Which Maimo nides expounds thus, * quicquid homines ab initio co- * More Nevocli. par. I. c. 26. OF PROPHECY. 185 gitationis sua? intelligentid et imaginatione sua pos sunt assequi, id in Scriptura attribuitur Creatori. And therefore we find almost all corporeal proper ties attributed to God in Scripture, quia vulgus ho minum ab initio cogitationis entitatem non apprehen-. dunt, nisi in rebus corporeis, as the same author ob-\ serves. But such of them as sound imperfection in vulgar ears, as eating and drinking, and the like, these (saith he) the Scripture no where attributes to him. The reason of this plain and idiotical style of Scripture it may be worth our farther taking no tice of, as it is laid down by the forenamed author, chap. 33. Ha?c causa est propter quam lex loquitur lingua filiorum hominum, &c. ' For this reason the law speaks according to the language of the sons of men, because it is the most commodious and easy way of initiating and teaching children, wo men, and the common people, who have not abUity to apprehend things according to the very nature and essence of them.' And in chap. 34. Et si per exempla et similitudines non deduceremur, &c. ' And if we were not led to the knowledge of things by examples and simUitudes, but were put to learn and understand all things in their formal notions and essential definitions, and were to believe no thing but upon preceding demonstrations ; then we may well think that (seeing this cannot be done but after long preparations) the greater part of men would be at the conclusion of their days, before they could know whether there be a God or no,' &c. Hence is that axiom so frequent among the Jewish doctors, Magna est virtus velfortitudo prophetarum, qui assimilant formam cum formante eam, i. e. /' Great is the power of the prophets, who while Aa 186 OF PROPHECY. they looked down upon these sensible and conspi- cable things, were able to furnish out the notion of intelligible and inconspicable beings thereby, to the rude senses of illiterate people.' The Scripture was not writ for sagacious and ab stracted minds only, or philosophical heads ; for then how few are there that should have been taught the true knowledge of God thereby ? Vidi filios ccenaculi, et erant pauci, was an ancient Jew ish proverb. We are not always rigidly to adhere to the very letter of the text. There is a r-hu and a -inoa in the Scripture, as the Jewish interpreters observe. We must not think that it always gives us formal definitions of things, for it speaks com monly according to vulgar apprehension : as when it tells of " the ends of the heaven," * which now almost every idiot knows hath no ends at all. So when it tells us that " God breathed into man the breath of Hfe, and man became a living soul ;" t the expression is very idiotical as may be, and seems to comply with that vulgar conceit, that the soul of man is nothing else but a kind of vital breath or air: and yet the immortality thereof is evidently insinuated in setting forth a double original of the two parts of man, his body and his soul ; the one of which is brought in as arising up out of the dust of the earth, the other as proceed ing from the breath of God himself. So we find very vulgar expressions concerning God himself, besides those which attribute sensa tion and motion to him, as when he is set forth as " riding upon the wings of the wind, riding upon * Psal. xix. 6. Matth. xxiv. 31. f Gen. ii. 7. 4 OF PROPHECY. 187 , the clouds, sitting in heaven," and the like, which seem to determine his indifferent omnipresence to some peculiar place : whereas indeed such pas sages as these can be fetched from nothing else but those crass apprehensions which the generality of men have of God, as being most there, from whence the objects of dread and admiration most of all smite and insinuate themselves into their senses, as they do from the air, clouds, winds, or heaven. So the state of hell and misery is set forth by such de nominations as were most apt to strike a terror in to the minds of men, and accordingly it is called castus gigantum, the place where all those old giants, whom divine vengeance pursued in the general de luge, were assembled together, as it is well observ ed by a late author * of our own upon Prov. xxi. 16. " The man that wandereth out of the way of understanding," in ccetu gigantum commordbitur. And accordingly we find the state and condition of these expressed, gigantes gemunt sub aquis, et qui habitant cum iis. Nudus est infernus coram illo, et nullum est operimentum perditioni, as the vul gar Latin renders it, " The giants groan under the waters, and they that dwell with them. Hell is naked before him, (that is, God,) and destruction hath no covering." t In like manner our Saviour sets forth hell as a great valley of fire like that of j Hinnom, which was prepared with a great deal off skUl, to torture and torment the devils in. Again we find heaven set forth sometimes as a place of continual banqueting, where, according to the Jew ish customs, thev should lie down in one another's * Mr. Mede in Diatrib. first part. f Job xxvi. 5, 6. 188 OF PROPHECY. bosoms at a perpetual feast : sometimes as a para dise furnished with all kinds of delight and pleasure. Again, when the Scripture would insinuate God's seriousness and reality in any thing, it brings him in as ordering it a great while ago, before the foun dation of the world was laid, as if he more regard ed that than the building of the world. I might instance in many more things of this na ture, wherein the phUosophical or physical nature and literal verity of things cannot so reasonably be supposed to be set forth to us, as the moral and theo logical. But I shall leave this argument, and now come more precisely to consider the nature of pro phecy, by which God flows in upon the minds of men extrinsically to their own proper operations, and conveys truth immediately from himself into them. CHAP. II. That the prophetical spirit did not always manifest itself with the same clearness and evidence. The gradual difference of divine illumination between Moses, the prophets, and the hagiographi. A general survey qf the nature qf prophecy properly so called. Of the joint impressions and operations ofthe understanding and fancy in prophecy. Of the four degrees of prophecy. The dif ference between a vision and a dream. -DUT before we do this, we shall briefly premise something in general concerning that gradual vari ety whereby these divine enthusiasms were disco vered to the prophets of old. The prophetical OF PROPHECY. 189 spirit did not always manifest itself eodem vigore lu- minis, with the same clearness and evidence, in the same exaltation of its light: but sometimes that light was more strong and vivid, ,sometimes more wan and obscure ; which seems to be insinuated in that passage, " God who in time past spake unto the fathers by the prophets," * mkvpsgug xai irokurgb- irug. So we find an evident difference of propheti- cal^ illumination asserted in Scripture between Mo ses and the rest of the prophets, " and there arose not a prophet since in Israel like unto Moses, whom the Lord knew face to face :" t which words have a manifest reference to that which God himself, in a more public and open way, declared concerning Moses, upon occasion of some arrogant speeches of Aaron and Miriam, who would equalise their own degree of prophecy to that of Moses. " And the Lord came down in the pillar of the cloud, and stood in the door of the tabernacle, and called Aaron and Miriam ; and they both came forth : and he said, Hear my words ; if there be a prophet among you, I the Lord wUl make myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto him in a dream : my servant Moses is not so, who is faithful in all mine house ; with him wiU I speak mouth to mouth, even apparently, and not in dark speeches; and the similitude of the Lord shall he behold. Wherefore then were ye not afraid to speak against my servant Moses ?"t In which words that degree of divine illumination whereby God made himself known to Moses seems to be set forth as something transcendent to the prophetical Ulumination : and * Heb. Ll. f Deut. xxxiv. 10. $ Numb. xii. 5—8. 190 OF PROPHECY. so the phrase of the New Testament is wont to distinguish between Moses and the prophets, as if indeed Moses had been greater than any prophet. But besides this gradual difference between Moses and the prophets, there is another difference very famous amongst the Jewish writers between the pro* phets and the hagiographi, which hagiographi were supposed by them to be much inferior to the pro* phets. But what this difference between them was, we shall endeavour to show more fully hereafter. Having briefly premised this, and glanced at a threefold inspiration relating to Moses, the prophets, and the hagiographi ; we shall first of all inquire into the nature of that which is peculiarly amongst the Jews called prophetical. And this is thus de fined to us by Maimonides,* Veritas et quidditas pro phetia? nihil aliud est quam infiuentia d Deo optimo maximo, mediante intellectu agente, super facul- tatem rationalem primb, deinde super facultatem imaginatricem infiuens, i. e. ' The true essence of prophecy is nothing else but an influence from the Deity upon the rational first, and afterwards the imaginative faculty, by the mediation of the active intellect.' Which definition belongs indeed to pro phecy as it is technically so called, and distinguish- ' ed by Maimonides both from that degree of divine Ulumination which was above it, which the masters constantly attribute to Moses, and from that other degree inferior to it, which they call «mpn nn spi ritus sanctus, that holy Spirit that moved in the souls of the hagiographi. But Rabbi Joseph Albot hath given us a more * More Nev. par. ii. cap. 36. f Maam. iii. cap. 8. De Fundamentis Fidei. OF PROPHECY. 191/ extensive description, so as to take in also the gra dus MosaicuS, -wpk na-in run Sy "pan' aurno ysva ysv Kin ¦oi crisa i. e. ' Prophecy is an influence from God upon the rational faculty, either by the mediation of the fancy or otherwise : and this influence, whe ther by the ministry of an angel or otherwise, makes a man to know such things as by his natural abUi ties he could not attain to the knowledge of.' Though here our author seems too much to have straightened the latitude of prophetical influence, whereby (as we intimated before) not only those pieces of divine truth may be communicated to the souls of men which are not contained within their own ideas, but also those may be excited which have a necessary connexion with, and dependence upon, reason. But the main thing that we shall observe in this description is, that faculty or power of the soul upon which these extraordinary impressions of di vine light or influence are made ; which in all pro per prophecy is both the rational and imaginative power. For in this case they supposed the imagin ative power to be set forth as a stage, upon which certain visa and simulacra were represented to their understandings, just indeed as they are to us in our common dreams ; only that the understandings of the prophets were always kept awake and strongly acted by God in the midst of these apparitions, to see the intelligible mysteries in them, and so in these types and shadows, which were symbols of some spiritual things, to behold the antitypes them selves : which is the meaning of that old maxim of the Jews wliich we formerly cited out of Maimo nides, Magna est virtus seufortitudo prophetarum 192 OF PROPHECY. qui assimilant formam cum formante eam. But in case the imaginative faculty be not thus set forth as the scene of all prophetical illumination, but that the impressions of things nakedly without any schemes or pictures be made immediately upon the understanding itself, then is it reckoned to be the gradus Mosaicus, wherein God speaks as it were '* face to face ;" of which more hereafter. Accordingly R. Albo, in the book before cited and tenth chapter, hath distinguished prophecy into these four degrees. The first and lowest of all is, when the imaginative power is most predo minant, so that the impressions made upon it are too busy, and the scene becomes too turbulent for the rational faculty to discern the true mystical and anagogical sense of them clearly ; and in this case the enthusiasms spend themselves extremely in pa rables, similitudes and allegories, in a dark and ob scure manner, as is very manifest in Zechariah's, and many of Ezekiel's prophecies, as also those of Dan iel : where, though we have first the outward frame of things dramatically set forth so potently in the prophet's fancy, as that his mind was not at the same time capable of the mystical meaning, yet that was afterwards made known to him, but yet with much obscurity still attending it. This declining state of prophecy the Jews sup posed then principally to have been, and this divine Ulumination to have been then, setting in the horizon of the Jewish church, when they were carried cap tive into Babylon. All which we may take a little more fully from our author himself* "oirwna pin r«ww vo, * Book iii. chap. 17. OF PROPHECY. 193 i. e. ' Every prophet that is of a strong, sagacious, and piercing understanding, will apprehend the thing nakedly without any similitude, whence it comes to pass that all his sayings prove distinct and clear, and free from all obscurity, having a Hteral truth in them : but a prophet of an inferior rank or degree, his words are obscure, inwrapped in rid dles and parables, and therefore have not a Hteral but allegorical truth contained in them.' Thus he. And so afterwards, according to the general opinion of the Jewish masters, he teUs us that after the captivity, in the twUight of prophecy, Ezekiel be gan to speak altogether in riddles and parables ; and so he himself complains to God, " Ah Lord God, they say of me, Doth he not speak para bles?"* The second degree which our forementioned au thor makes of prophecy is, when the strength of / the imaginative and rational powers equally balance^ each other. ^ The third is, when the rational power is most pre dominant ; in which case (as we heard before) the mind of the prophet is able to strip those things, that are represented to it in the glass of fancy, of"/ all their materiality and sensible nature, arid ap prehend them more distinctly in their own naked essence. The last and highest is the gradus Mosaicus, in which all imagination ceasejth, and the representa tion of truth descends not so low as the imaginative part, but is made in the highest stage of reason and understanding. But we shaU hereafter speak more fully concern- * Ezek. xx. 49. B b 194 OF PROPHECY. ing the several degrees of prophetical inspiration,. and discourse more particularly of the Ruach kak- kodesh, the highest degree of prophecy or gradus Mosaicus, and Bath col, or the lowest degree of prophecy. Seeing then, that generaUy, all prophecy or pro phetical enthusiasm Hes in the joint impressions and operations of both these forementioned facul ties, the Jews were wont to understand that place* as generaUy decyphering that state or degree of prophecy by which God woiUd discover himself to all those prophets that ever should arise up amongst them, or ever had been, except Moses and the Messiah. And there are only these two ways de clared, whereby God would reveal himself to every other prophet, either in a vision or a dream ;f both which are perpetually attended with those visa and simulacra sensibilia as must needs be impressed upon common sense or fancy, whereby the prophets seemed to have all their senses waking and exercis ing their several functions, though indeed aU was but scenical or dramatical. According to this two fold way of divine inspiration, the prophet Joel foretels the nature of that prophetical spirit that should be poured out in the latter times ;t and we have the false prophets brought in as endeavouring apishly to imitate the true prophets of God, in for tifying their fancies by the power of divination, that they might talk of dreams and visions when they came among the people. § * Numb. xii. 6, &c. , f In istis duabus partibus, somnio et visions, continentur omnes prophetia; gradus. Maimon. in More Nev. Part. II. cap. 36. t Joel. ii. 28. § Jer. xiv. 14. 3 OF PROPHECY. 195 Now for the difference of these two, a dream / and a vision, it seems rather to lie in circumstan tials than in any thing essential ; and therefore Maimonides tells us,* that in a dream a voice was frequently heard, which was not usual .in a vision. But? the representation of divine things by some sensible images or some narrative voice must needs be in them both. But yet the Jews are wont to make a vision superior to a dream, as represent ing things 'more to the life, which indeed seizeth upon the prophet while he is awake, but it no sooner surpriseth him than all his external senses are bound; and so it often declines into a true dream, as Maimonides, in the place forenamed, proves by the example of Abraham, where the vi sion in which God had appeared to him (as it is re lated Gen. xv. 1.) passed into a sleep. " And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abraham ; and, lo, a horror of great darkness fell upon him."t Which words seem to be nothing else but a description of that passage which he had by sleep out of his vision into a dream, v > Now these ecstatical impressions, whereby the imagination and mind of the prophet was thus ra vished from itself, and was made subject wholly to some agent, intellect informing it and shining upon it, I suppose St. Paul had respect to. " Now we see hi iabirrgou iv aiviy^ari, by a glass, in riddles or parables ;t for so he seems to compare the highest Uluminations which we have here, with that con stant irradiation of the Divinity upon the souls of men in the life to come : and this glassing of di- •Maira. Part II. More N«v. cap. 45. f Gen. xv. 12. \ 1 Cor. xiii. 12. J 96 OF PROPHECY. vine things by hieroglyphics and emblems in the fancy which he speaks of, was the proper way of prophetical inspiration. For the further clearing of which, I shall take notice of one passage more out of a Jewish writer, that is, R. Bechai, concerning this present argu ment* 'i3i D'sojn -mo rwoa b^vmrh rofi voluit Deus assi- milare prophetiam reliquorum prophetarum homini speculum inspicienti, prout innuunt Rabbini nostri illo axiomate proverbiali, nemo inspiciat speculum sabbato : illud speculum est vitreum, in quorefkctitur homini sua ipsius forma et imago per vim reflexivdm speculi, cum revera nihil ejusmodi in speculo realiter existat. Talis erat prophetia reliquorum propheta rum, eo quod contuebantur sacras etpuras imagines et lumina superna, ex medio splendoris et puritatis isto- rum luminum realium, visa? sunt illis similitudines, vi sa? sunt illis tales forma? quotes sunt forma? humana?. By which he seems to refer to those images of the living creatures represented in a prophetical vision to Isaiah and Ezekiel ; but generally inti mates thus much to us, that the Hght and splendour of prophetical Ulumination was not so triumphant over the prophet's fancy, but that he viewed his own image, and saw like a man, and understood things after the manner of men in all these pro phetical visions. * Com. in Num. xii. 6. OF PROPHECY. 197 CHAP. III. How tke prophetical dreams did differ from all other kinds qf dreams recorded in Scripture. This further illustrated out qf several passages qf Philo Judceus pertinent to this purpose. W E have now taken a general survey of the na ture of prophecy, which is always attended, as we have shown, with a vision or a dream, though in deed there is no dream properly without a vision. And here, before we pass from hence, it wiU be ne cessary to take notice of a main distinction the Hebrew doctors are wont to make of dreams, lest we mistake all those dreams which we meet with in Scrip ture, and take them aU for prophetical, whereas many of them were not such. For though indeed they were all Sebirepirra sent by God, yet many were sent as monitions and instructions, and, had not Jjj.g .true force and vigour of prophetical dreams in them; and so~tHey'afe wont commonly fo distinguish be tween p"W ca^n and"Ki33n o-bn. There are somniavera, and somnia prophetica : and these Maimonides hath thus generally characterized,* quando dicitur, Deus venit ad N. in somnio noctis, id prophetia minime nuncupari potest, neque vir talis, propheta, &c. ' When it is said in holy writ, that God came to such a man in a dream of the night, that cannot be caUed a prophecy, nor such a man a prophet ; for the meaning is no more than this, that some admo nition or instruction was given by God to such a man, and that it was in a dream.' Of this sort he and the rest of the Hebrew writers hold those * More Nev. Part II. cap. 41. 198 OF PROPHECY. dreams to be which were sent to Pharaoh, Nebu chadnezzar, Abimelech, and Laban; upon which two last our author observes the great caution of Onkelos the proselyte, who was instructed in the Jewish learning by R. Eleazar and R. Joshua, the most famous doctors of that age, that in his pre face to those dreams of Laban and Abimelech he says, et venit verbum d Domino : but doth not say, as when the dreams were prophetical, et revelavit se Dominus. Besides, a main reason for which they deny those dreams to be prophetical is, that they that were made partakers of them were unsanctified men ; whereas it is a tradition amongst them, that the spirit of prophecy was not communicated to any but good men. But indeed the main difference between these two sorts of dreams seems to consist in this, that such as were not prophetical were much weaker in their energy upon the imagination than the other were, in so much that they wanted the strength and force of a divine evidence, so as to give a plenary assurance to the mind of him who was the subject of them, of their divine original ; as we see in those dreams of Solomon,* where it is said of him, when he awoke he said, " Behold it was a dream ;" as if he had not been effectually confirmed from the energy of the dream itself that it was a true pro phetical influx. But there is yet another difference they are wont to make between them, which is, that these somnia vera or vouhenxd ordinarily contained in them ona-i o,l?B3 something that was dgybv or void of reality : * 1 Kings iii. 5 — IS. an! ix. 2. OF PROPHECY. 199 as in that dream of Joseph concerning the sun, the moon, and the eleven stars bowing down to him ; whereas his mother, which should there have been signified by the moon, was dead and buried before, and so incapable of performing that respect to him which the other at last did. Upon occasion of which dream the Gemarist. doctors * have framed this axiom, ^a Dibrfr-wstt vx ?a »3nt6a -ob -«P3K vssp atra D'Soa ona-i, « As there is no corn without straw, so neither is there any mere dream without something ' that is dgybv, void of reahty, and insignificant. Ac cordingly Rab. Albo t hath framed this distinction between them, rv?a nwajm o^tsa ona-i sba a-fen *'« vinw pmx yis ' There is no mere dream without some thing in it that is agybv, but prophecy is, a thing wholly and most exactly true.' The general difference between prophetical dreams and those that are merely nouthetical or monitory, and all else which we find recorded in Scripture, PhUo Jud. in his Tract irsgi rou ^eair'spirroug shai bveigoug, and elsewhere, hath at large laid down. The proper character of those that were propheti cal he clearly insinuates to be that ecstatical rapture whereby in all prophetical dreams some more po tent cause, acting upon the mind and imagination of the prophets, snatched them from themselves, and so left more potent and evident impressions upon them. I shall the more largely set down his notion, be cause it tends to the clearing ofthe business in hand, and is, I think, much obscured, if not totaUy cor rupted by his translator Gelenius. His design is * Berachoth, cap. ix. f Maam. iii. cap. 9. 200 OF PROPHECY. indeed to show, that Moses taught these several ways whereby dreams are conveyed from heaven, that so his subhme and recondite doctrine might be the better hid up therein ; and therefore sailing be- . tween Cabbalism and Platonism, he gropes after an allegorical and mystical meaning in them all. His first sort of divine dreams he thus defines, rb ukv irgurov, nv dgypvrog rrjg xtvnaemg §eou, xai inrnyfiuvrog aogd- rtug rd r)fuv f/iev dhifka, yvugif/jcc hs sauru, ' The first kind was when God himself did begin the motion in the fancy, and secretly whispered such things as are unknown indeed to us, but perfectly known to himself.' And of this sort he makes Joseph's dreams, the sense whereof was unknown to Joseph himself at first, and then runs out into an allegori cal exposition of them in the book entitled Joseph. The second kind is this, Trig npsr'egag hiavoiag w? ruv okuv auyxivoufju'evng ^"Xtf* *°" Ssopognrou paviag dva- iripirka\jkvng, &c. ' When our rational faculty, being moved together with the soul of the world, and filled with a divinely-inspired fury, doth predict those things that are to come.' In which words, by his ¦fyuyf} ruv okuv he means the same thing with that which in a former book about the same argument he had called ruv okuv vouv ' the mind, of the universe,' which mingling its influence with our minds, begets these irgoyvuasig or previsions. And this is nothing else but that which others of his tribe call Span "-ot or intellectus agens, which it seems he understood to be the same with anima mundi, or « universal soul,' as it is described by the Pythagoreans and Platonists. Of this sort of dreams he makes those of Jacobus ladder and of Laban's sheep. And these kinds of dreams, viz. that where- OF PROPHECY. 201 in the intellectus agens doth simply act upon our minds as patients to it, and that wherein our minds do co-operate with the universal soul, and so under stand the meaning of the influx, he thus compares together ; A ip<& ftiapsusiv hgdlyfiara' rb fi&, yfiw, suS'sag ahtjkoui/rog xai hhoiuZpProg xai dpvhgSig uifokapfidvbvrog, ou irayimg xai rrjkavyug oguvrog avdp^ffld ianv, &C. " Joseph Said, - [t methought we were binding sheaves" tj * That word [methought] is the language of one that is un- certain* dubious, and obscurely surmising ; not of one that is firmly assured, and plainly sees things : indeed it Very well befits those who are newly awoke out of a sound sleep, and have scarce ceased to dream, to say [methought ;] not those who are fully awake, and behold all things clearly. But Jacob, who was more exercised in divine things, hath no such word as [methought] when he speaks of his dream, but, says he, *' Behold, a ladder set upon the earth, and the top of it reached up to heaven/' ' &c.§ After the same manner, almost, doth Maimonides in his More Nev. distinguish between somniavera m&pFophetica, Making Jacob's dreams (as all the Jewish writers do) to be prophetical. The third kind of dreams mentioned by Philo is thus laid down by him, *2,uvivrarai hs rb rgirov eihmg, 'bir'orav h> rdig b'lrvmg if iawfe $ ^vyjj ixivovp&vq-, xai ava- ^woSow iuurjjv> xoguftavna' xai iv^touatuaa, huvd^et n°go- yvuarixvi rd pAkkovra fteairifyi, i. e. ' The third kind is, when in sleep the soul being moved of itself and agitating itself, is in a kind of rapturous rage, and in a divine fury doth foretell future "tilings by a prophetic faculty.' And then* which is more to our purpose, he thus sets forth the nature of those fen-- * Though he was a Jew, yet was he trained up amongst the "Greeks, and not well acquainted With the Hebrew language. ., •(¦ Which word Is not in the Hebrew. \ Gen. xxxvii. 7. § Gen. xxviii. 12. OJ PROPHECY. 203 cies which discover themselves in these kiad of dreams. A/ he xard rb rgirov ethog pavraaiat pakkov ruv irgor'eguv hnkoupevat, hid rb |3a^t) xai xaraxogsg s%etv ,rb a'iviypa, ihei$rflav xai rijg bveigoxginxtji eirtarrj^rig, i. e. ' The phantasms which belong to the third kind, are more plainly declared by Moses than the for mer ; for, containing a very profound and dark meaning, they required to the explaining of them a knowledge of the art of interpreting dreams : as those dreams of Pharaoh, his butler, and baker, and of Nebuchadnezzar, who were only amazed and dazzled with those strange apparitions that were made to them, but not at all enlightened by them. These are of that kind whieh Plato sometimes speaks of, that cannot be understood without a pro phet ; and therefore he would have some prophet or wise man always set over this pavnxq. Thus we have seen these three sorts of dreams according to PhUo^t he first and last whereof the Jewish doc tors conjoin together, apd constantly prefer the Qneiroqritics of them, to the dreamers themselves : and therefore, whereas they depress the notion of • them considered in themselves below any degree of prophecy, yet the interpretation of them they attri bute to the «nipn rvo or Holy Spirit; except there be an interpretation of the dream in the dream itself, so that the mind of the dreamer be fuUy satisfied both in the meaning and divinity thereof; for then it is truly prophetical. And thus much for this particular. 204 OF PROPHECY. CHAP. IV. A large account qf the difference between the true prophetical spirit and enthusiastical impostures. That the pseudo-prophe tical spirit is seated only in the imaginative powers and faculties inferior to reason. That Plato and other wise men had a very low opinion qf this spirit, and qf the gift of divination, and of consulting the oracles. That the true prophetical spirit seats it self as well in the rational as in the sensitive powers, and that it never alienates the mind, but informs and enlightens it. This further cleared by several testimonies from Gentile and Christian writers qf old. An account qf those fears and consternations • which often seized upon the prophets. How the prophets per ceived when the prophetical influx seized upon them. The dif ferent evidence and energy qf the true and false prophetical spirit. j Jt* ROM what we have formerly discoursed con cerning the stage of fancy and imagination upon which those visa presented themselves to the mind of the prophet, in which he beheld the real objects of divine truth in which he was inspired by this means ; it may be easily apprehended how easy a matter it might be for the DevU's prophets many times, by an apish imitation, to counterfeit the true prophets of God, and how sometimes melancholy and turgent fancies, fortified with a strong power of divination, might unfold themselves in a sem blance of true enthusiasms. For indeed herein the prophetical influx seems to agree with a mistaken enthusiasm, that both of them make strong impres sions upon the imaginative powers, and require the imaginative. Faculty to be vigorous and potent : and therefore Maimonides tells us that the gift of divi- OF PROPHECY. 205 nation, which consisted in a mighty force of ima gination, was always given to the prophets, and that this and a spirit of fortitude were the main basis of prophecy ;* Duas istasfacultates,fortitudinis scilicet et divinationis, in prophetis forlissimas et vehemen- tissimas esse necesse est, &c. i. e. * It is necessary that these two faculties of fortitude and divination should be most strong and vehement in the pro phets : whereunto if at any time there was an ac cession of the influence of the intellect, they were then beyond measure corroborated; in so much that (as it is well known) it hath come to this, that one man by a naked staff did prevaU over a potent king, and most manfully delivered a whole nation from bondage, viz. after it was said to him " I will be with thee."t And though there be different degrees of these in men, yet none can be altogether without that fortitude and magnanimity. So it was said to Jeremiah, " Be not dismayed at their faces," &ct " Behold I have made thee this day a defenced city ;" and so to Ezekiel, " Be not afraid of them nor their words :"§ and generaUy in all the prophets we shall find a great fortitude and magna nimity of spirit. But by the excellency of the gift of divining they could on a sudden and in a moment foreteU future things ; in which faculty notwithstanding there was great diversity.' Thus he. It wUl not be therefore any great digression here, awhile to examine the nature of this false light which pretends to prophecy, but is not ; as being * More Nev. Part. II. cap. 38. f Exod- "'• 12- \ Jer. xvii. 18. § Ezek. ii. 6. 206 , OF PROPHECY. seated only in the imaginative power, from whence the first occasion of this delusion ariseth, seeing that power is also the seat of aU prophetical vision. For this purpose it wUlnot be amiss to premise that threefold degree of cognitive influence pointed out by Maimonides.* Theirs* is whoUy inteUectual, descending only into the rational faculty, by which that is extremely fortified and strengthened in the distinct apprehension of metaphysical truths, from whence, as he tells us, ariseth the sect of philoso phers, and contemplative persons. The second is jointly into the rational and imaginative faculty to gether, and from thence springs the sect of prophets, The third into the imaginative only, from whence proceeds the sect of poHticians, lawyers, and law givers, whose conceptions only run in a secular channel, as also the sect of diviners, enchanters, dreamers, and soothsayers. We shaU copy out of him a character of some of this third sort, the rather because it so graphically delineates to us many enthusiastical impostors. of our age. His words are these, Hic vero monendus es, ex tertio genere esse quosdam, quibus phantasia?, somnia et ecstases, quales in prophetiw visione esse so- lent, ita mirabiles obveniunt, ut plane sibi persuadeant se prophetas esse, &c. i. e. ' But here I must inform thee, that there are some of this third sort who have sometimes such strange fancies, dreams, and ecstacies, that they take themselves for prophets, and much marvel that they have such fancies and imaginations ; conceiting at last that all sciences and faculties are without any pains or study infused * More Nev. Part. II. cap. 37. OF PROPHECY. 207 into them. And hence it is that they fall into great confusions in many theoretical matters of no smaU moment, and do so mix true notions with such as are merely seeming and imaginary, as if heaven and earth were jumbled together. AU which proceeds from the too great force of the imaginative faculty, and the imbecUity of the rational, whence it is that nothing in it can pass forth into act.' Thus he. This delusion then, in his sense of those 'EvegyeO- pievoi which pretend to revelations, ariseth from hence, that all this foreign force that is upon them, serves only to vigorate and impregnate their fancies andiwiaginatioaas, but does not inform their reasons, nor elevate them to a true understanding of things in their coherence and contexture ; and therefore they can so easUy embrace things absurd to all true and sober reason: whereas the prophetical spirit acting principally upon the reason and utiderstand- mg of the prophets, guided them consistently and inteUigibly into the understanding of things. But this pseudo-prophetical spirit being not able to rise up above this low and dark region of sense or mat ter, or to soar al«ofl into a clear heaven of vision, endeavoured always, as much as might be, to Strengthen itself in the imaginative part :: and therefore the wizards and false prophets of old and latter times have been wont always to heighten their fancies and imaginations by all means pos sible ; which R. Albo insinuates,* carraa to vi "wifW r-misn cana© «a" * There are some men whose imaginative faculty is strong, either by nature, ot by some artifice which they use to fortify this ima- * Maam. III. cap. 10. 208 OF PROPHECY. ginative faculty with ; and for such purpose are the artifices which witches and such as have familiar spirits do use, by the help whereof the simUitudes of things are more easily excited in the imagina tion.' Accordingly Wierus,* who was a man (as some think) too well acquainted with these myste ries, though he himself seems to defy them, speaks to the same purpose concerning witches, how that, so they may have more pregnant fancies, they anoint themselves, and diet themselves with some such food as they understand from the DevU is very fit for that purpose. And for further proof hereof he there quotes Baptista Porta, lib. II. and Cardan de Subtil, cap. 18. But we shaU not over- curiously pry any further into these arts. This kind of divination resting merely in the imaginative faculty, seemed so exactly to imitate the prophetical energy in this part of it, that in deed it hath been by weaker minds mistaken for it, though the wiser sort of the heathens have happily found out the lameness and delusiveness bf it. We have it excellently set forth by Plato in his Timaeus, where, speaking of God's liberality in constituting man, he thus speaks of this divination, xai rb pau- kov npuv, 'iva dkndsiag irrj irgoadirroiro, xarsarnaav iv rov- tu rb pavrsiov. ixavbv hs anpsTov ug pavnxnv dpgoauvn < Osbg dvdguirivn h'shuxsv, &c. i. e. ' As for our baser part, that it might in some sort partake of truth, God hath seated in it the power of divining : and it is a sufficient sign that God has indulged this faculty of divining to the foolishness of men ; for there is no sober man that is touched with this power of divin- * Lib. III. cap. 17. De Praestigiis Dajmonum. OF PROPHECY. 209 ation, unless in sleep, when his reason is bound, or when by sickness or enthusiasm he suffers some alienation of mind. But it is then for the wise and sober to understand what is spoken or represented in this fatidical passion.' And so it seems Plato, who was no careless observer of these matters, could no where find this divining spirit in his time, except it were joined some way or other cum mentis alie- natione ; and therefore he looks upon it as that wliich is inferior to wisdom, and to be regulated by it : for so he further declares his mind to the same purpose, "O&c hq xai rb ruv Ugoprjruv y'evog im ratg h- 6'sotg ftavrsiaig xgirag iirixa&tardvai vbyuog, oug fjjdvretg iiro- vopdfyuai rivsg, &c. that is, ' Wherefore it is a law that prophets, should be set as it were judges over these enthusiastic divinations, which prophets some ignorantly and falsely call diviners.' For indeed these prophets to whom in his sense he gives fhe pre-eminence, are none else but wise and prudent men, who by reason of the sagacity of their under standings were able to judge of those things which were uttered by this dull spirit of divination, which resided only in faculties inferior to reason. So in his Charmides, E; he (Zoukoib ys, xai rnv (Jbavrixjjv sHvai auy- yp)gnao\hsv siriarn^nv rou fju'skkovrog saeadai, &c. i. e. ' But, if you wUl, we wiU grant the gift of divination to be a knowledge of what is to come : but withal, that it is fit that wisdom and sobriety should be judge and interpreter.' But further, that his age was ac quainted with no other divinations than that which ariseth from a troubled fancy, and is conceived in a dark melancholy imagination, he confirms to us in his Phasdrus, where he rightly gives us the true etymon of this pavnxn, that it was called so dirb rn~g Pd 210 OF PROPHECY. fmviag, ' from rage and fury,' and therefore says it was anciently called pavtxn. However, he grants that it happened to many ^teia poiga by divine allot ment ; yet it was most vulgarly incident to sick and melancholy men, who oftentimes by the power thereof were able to presage by what medicines their own distempers might be best cured, as if it were nothing else but a discerning of that sympa thizing and symbolizing complexion of their own bodies with some other bodies without them. And elsewhere he tells us that these uidvrstg never, or very rarely, understood the meaning and nature of their own visa. And therefore indeed the Platonists^ generaUy seemed to reject, or very much to slight aU this kind of revelation, and to acknowledge nothing transcendent to the naked reason and understand ing of man. So Maximus Tyrius in Dissert. III. &eou hs ybavretov xai dvdguiruv joug (rokpngbv psv elirsiv, pgdaai hs opug) ygrjpa auyyeveg, ' It is a bold assertion, yet I shall not doubt to say, that God's oracles and men's understandings are of a near aUiance.' And so, according to Porphyrius, * iregi diroy/jg, a good man is Aibg psydkou bagiarrjg, one that needs not soothsaying, being familiarly and intimately ac quainted with God himself. Likewise the Stoics will scarce allow their wise man at any time to consult an oracle, as we may learn from Arrian, L. II. c. 7. and Epictetus, c. 39. and Simplicus' Comment thereupon: where that great philosopher, making a scrupulous search what those things were about which it might be fit to • Lib. II. §. 52. 5 OF PROPHECY. 21 1 consult the oracle, at last brings them into so narrow a compass, that a wise man should never find oc casion to honour the oracle with his presence. A famous instance whereof we have in Lucan, Lib. IX. where Cato, being advised to consult Jupiter Hammon's oracle after Pompey's death, answers, Estm? Dei s^des nisi terra et pontus et aer Et coelum et virtus ? Superos quid quaerimus ultra ? Jupiter est quodcunque vides, quocunque moveris. Sortilegis egeant dubii semperque futuris Casibus ancipites ; me non oracula certum, Sed mors certa facit But enough of this particular ; and I hope by this time I have sufficiently unfolded the true seat of prophecy, and showed the right stage thereof: as also how lame and delusive the spirit of divination was, which endeavoured to imitate it. Now from what hath been said ariseth one main characteristical distinction between the prophetical and pseudo-prophetical spirit, viz. That the pro phetical spirit doth never alienate the mind, (seeing it seats itself as well in the rational as in the sen sitive powers,) but always maintains a consistency and clearness of reason, strength, and solidity of judgment, where it comes ; it doth not ravish the mind, but inform and enlighten it : but the pseu do-prophetical spirit, if indeed without any kind of dissimulation it enters into any one, because it can rise no higher than the middle region of man, which is his fancy, it there dwells as in storms and tempests, and being akoybv n in itself, is also con joined _mtix.jHenations_ and abruptions of mind. For whensoever the phantasms come to be disor- 212, OF PROPHECY. dered, and to be presented tumultuously to the soul, as it is either in a pavta fury, or in melan choly, (both which kinds of alienation are com monly observed by physicians) or else by the ener gy of this spirit of' divination, the mind can pass no true judgment upon them ; but its light and influ ence becomes eclipsed. But of this alienation we have already discoursed out of Plato and others. And thus the Pythian prophetess is described by the scholiast upon Aristophanes' Plutus, and by Lucan,* as being filled with inward fury, while she was inspired by the fatidical spirit, and uttering her oracles in a strange disguise with many antic ges tures, her hair torn, and foaming at her mouth. As also Cassandra is brought in prophesying in the like manner by Lycophron. So the sibyl was not ed by Heraclitus, ug patvo\Avu arbpari yskaara xai u- xakkuiriara pkyyoylevn, ' as one speaking ridiculous and unseemly speeches with her furious mouth.' And Ammianus Marcellinus, in the beginning of his 21st book, hath told us an old observation con cerning- the sibyls, sibylla? crebro se dicunt ardere, torrente vi magna fiammarum. This was cautiously observed by the primitive fathers, who hereby detected the impostures of the Montanists, that pretended much to prophecy, but indeed were acquainted with nothing more of it than ecstacies or abruptions of mind : for that is it which they mean by ecstacies. I shall first men tion that of Clemens Alexandrinus,t 'Ek he roig -\iu- heat xai dkndn rtva ekeyov 0/ ipsuhoirgoprJTtti' xai ru b'vn ourot iv ixardaet irgospnreuov, ug av ' Airoardrou htdxovoi, • Lib. V. f Strom. 1. OF PROPHECY. 213 that is, ' The false prophets mingled truth some times with falsehood : and indeed when they were in an ecstacy, they prophesied, as being servants to that grand apostate the Devil.' Eusebius* men tions a discourse of Miltiades to this purpose, iregi rou pr) hetv wgopnrnv iv iragexaraaei kakeiv. Tertul lian, who was a great friend to Montanus and his prophetical sisters MaximUla and Priscilla, speak ing of them, endeavours to alleviate this business : and though he grants they were ecstatical in their prophecies, that is, only transported by the power of a spirit more potent than their own, as he would seem to imply ; yet he denies that they used to faU into any rage or fury, which he says is the charac ter of every false prophet ; and so Montanus ex cused himself. But yet for all this, they could not avoid the lash of Jerome, who thought he saw through this ecstacy, and that indeed it was a true alienation, seeing they understood not what they spoke. Neque verb fut Montanus, cuminsanis fe minis, somniatj propheta? in ecstasi locuti sunt, ut nes- cirent quid loquerentur ; et cum alios erudirent, ipsi ignorarent quid dicerent, ' The prophets did not (as Montanus, together with some mad women, dreams) speak in ecstacies, nor did they speak they knew not what; nor were they, when they' went about fo instruct others, ignorant of what they said themselves.' So he in his preface to Isaiah. This also he elsewhere brands the Montanists withal ; as in his Prooemium to Nahum, Non loquitur pro pheta iv exardaei, ut Montanus et Prisca Maximil- laque delirant ; sed quod prophetat, liber est intelli- * Histor. Eccles. Lib. V. cap. 7. 214 OF PROPHECY. gentis qua? loquitur. And in his preface to Ha bakkuk, — propheta? visio est, et adversum Montani dogma perversum intelligit quod videt, nee ut amens loquitur, nee in morem insanientium feminarum dot sine mente sonum. I shaU add but one author more, and that is Chrysostom, who hath very fully and excellently laid down this difference between the true and false prophets,* ToDro pdvrsag 'ihiov, rb efy- arnx'svai, rb uvdyxnv uiropevetv, rb u6eia6at, ro ekxeadai ua- •rsg f//aivbf/,svov, ' It is the property of a diviner to be ecstatical, to undergo some violence, to be tossed and hurried about like a madman :' 'O hs irgopnrnt ouy ourug, akkd fjusra hiavoiag vnpouang, xai awpgovouaqg xa- raardaeug, xai sihug a p&syysrai pnatv diravra, ' But it is otherwise with a prophet, whose understanding is awake, and his mind in a sober and orderly temper, and he knows every thing that he saith.' But here we must not mistake the business, as if there were nothing but the most absolute clearness and serenity of thoughts lodging in the soul of the prophet amidst all his visions: and therefore we shall further take notice of that observation of the Jews, which is vulgarly known by all acquainted with their writings, which is concerning those pa nic fears, consternations, affrightments, and trem blings, which frequently seized upon them, together with the prophetical influx. And indeed, by how much stronger and more vehement those impres sions were which were made by those unwonted visa which came in to act upon their imagina tive faculty, by so much the greater was this per turbation and trouble : and by how much the more * Horn. 28. on the first Epistle to the Corinthian?. OF PROPHECY. 215 the propliet's imagination was exercised by the la- boriousness of these phantasms, the more were his natural strength and spirits exhausted, as indeed it must needs be. Therefore Daniel, being wearied with the toUsome work of his fancy about those vi sions that were presented to him, complains that " there was no strength left in him ;" that " his comeliness was turned into corruption, and he re tained no strength ;" that " when he heard the voice, he was in a deep sleep, and his face toward the ground ;" that " his sorrows were turned upon him, and no breath was left in him."* So when the vision presented to Abraham passed into a pro phetical dream, it is said, " a deep sleep fell upon Abraham, and a horror of great darkness fell upon him."t Upon which passage Maimonides thus discourseth : Quandoque autem prophetia incipit in visione prophetica, et postea multiplicatur terror et passio ilia vehemens, quce sequitur perfectionem opera- tionum facultatis imaginatricis, et tum demum venit prophetia, sicuti contigit Abrahamo. In principio enim prophetia? illius dicitur, (Gen. xv. 1.) Et fuit verbum Domini ad Abrahamum in visione ; et in fine ejusdem (ver. 12.). Et sopor irruit in Abrahamum, &c. And in like manner he speaks of those fati- gations that Daniel complains of, Est autem terror quidam panicus qui occupat prophetam inter vigilan- dum, sicut ex Daniele patet, quando ait, Et vidivisio- nem magnam hanc, neque remansit in me ullaforti- tudo, et vis mea mutata est in corruptionem, nee reti- nui fortitudinem ullam. Et fiui lethargo pppressus super faciem meam ; et facies mea ad terrain.. And \ * Dan. x. 8,&c. f Sen, xv. 12. J More Nev. Part II. cap. 41. 216 OF PROPHECY. thus this whole business is excellently decyphered to us by R. Albo* 'iav pro-ran man rvnaxnn "«n nan ' Behold, by reason of the strength of the imagin ative feculty, and the precedency of the influence upon that to the influence upon the rational, the influx doth not remain upon the prophet without terror and consternation ; insomuch that his mem bers shake and his joints are loosened, and he seems like one that is ready to give up the ghost by reason of his great astonishment : after all which perturba tion the prophetical influx settles itself upon the rational faculty.' From this notion perhaps we may borrow some light for the clearing of Jeremiah, xxiii. 9. " Mine heart within me is broken because of the prophets ; all my bones shake : I am like a drunken man, and like a man whom wine hath overcome, because ofthe Lord,' and because ofthe words of his holiness." The importance of which words is, That the energy of prophetical vision wrought- thus potently upon his animal part. Though I know R. Solomon seems to look at another meaning : but Abarbanel is here full for our present purpose, a,l?a« Dwajn ojvk irvn-v nisna 'iai '3"ipa -a1? iaw nntn M*np otijmtoi dtthpi ' When Jere miah saw those false prophets eating and drinking, and faring deliriously, he cried out and said, " My heart is broken within me because ofthe prophets ;" for while I behold their works, my heart is rent asunder with the extremity of my sorrow, and be cause of the prophetical influx residing upon me, " my bones are all rotten, and I am like a drunken man" that neither sees nor hears. And all this hath * Lib. III. cap. 10. OF PROPHECY. 217 befell me, " because of the Lord," that is, because of the divine influx that seized upon me, and "be cause ofthe words of his holiness," which have wrought such a conturbation within me, that all my senses are stupified thereby.' And thus I suppose is also that passage in Ezekiel Hi. 14. to be expounded, where the prophet describes the energy and dominion which the prophetical spirit had over him, when in a prophetical vision he was carried by way of imagi nation a tedious journey to those of the captivity that dwelt by the river Chebar. "The spirit ofthe Lord lifted me up, and took me away, and I went in bitterness, and in the heat (or hot chafing and anger) of my spirit ; but the hand of the Lord was strong upon me." So Habak. Hi. 2. " O Lord, I have heard thy speech, and was afraid ;" that is, the prophetical voice heard by him, and represent ed in his imagination, was so strong that it struck a panic fear (as Maimonides expresseth it) into him. And it may be the same thing is meant Isa. xxi. 3. where the prophet describes that inward conturba tion and consternation that his vision of Babylon's ruin was accompanied withal. " Therefore are my loins filled with pain ; pangs have taken hold upon me, as the pangs of a woman that travaileth : I was bowed down at the hearing of it, I was dismayed at the seeing of it." Though I know there may be another meaning of that place not improper, viz. that the prophet personates Babylon in the horror of that anguish that should come upon them, whereby he sets it forth the more to the life, as Jonathan the Targumist and others would have it ; though yet I cannot think this the most congruous meaning. But I have now done with this particular, and I Ee 218 OF PROPHECY. hope by this time have gained a fair advantage of solving one difficulty, which, though it be not so much observed by our own as it is by the Jewish writers, yet it is worth our scanning, viz. How the prophets perceived when the prophetical inspiration first seized upon them. For, as we have before showed, there may be such dreams and visions which are merely delusive, and such as the false prophets were often partakers of; and besides, the true prophets might have often such dreams as were merely vera somnia, tme dreams, but not prophetical. For the full solution of this knot we have before showed how this pseudo-prophetical spirit only flut ters below upon the more terrene parts of man's soul, liis passions and fancy. The prince of dark ness comes not within the sphere of light and rea son to order affairs there, but that is left to the sole economy and sovereignty of the Father of lights. There is a clear and bright heaven in manfs soul, in which LucireTTmiuself cannot subsist, but is thrown down from thence as often as he essays to climb up into it. But to come more expressly to the business ; the Hebrew masters here tell us, that in the beginning of prophetical inspiration the prophets used to have some apparition or image of a man or angel pre senting itself to .their imagination. Sometimes it began withja voice, and that either strong and vehe ment, or else soft and famUiar. And so God is said first of all to appear to Samuel, who is said " not yet to have known the Lord," * that is, as Maimonides + expounds it, Ignoravit adhuc tunc temporis Deum hoc modo cum prophetis loqui solere, * 1 Sam. iii. 7. fMore Nev. Part II. cap. 44. OF PROPHECY. 219 et quod hoc mysterium nondum fuit ei revelatum. In the same manner R. Albo. * For otherwise we must not think that Samuel was then ignorant ofthe true God, but that he knew not the manner of that voice by which the prophetical spirit was wont to awaken the attention of the prophets. And that this was the ancient opinion ofthe Jews, R. Solomon tells us out of the Massecheth Tamid, where the doctors thus gloss upon this place, Q-)® nNiiJ Vip pay too n\-r n1? pny n\n\ myvi\ i- e. * as yet he knew not the Lord, that is, he knew not the manner of the prophetical voice. This is that soft and gentle voice whereby the sense of the prophet is sometimes attempted, but sometimes this voice is more vehement.' It will not be amiss to hear Maimonides' words ;t Nonnunquam fit ut verbum illud quod propheta audit in visione prophetia?, ei vi deatur fieri voce robustissimd, &c. i. e. ' It sometimes happens that the word which the prophet hears in a prophetical vision, seems to strike him with a more vehement noise ; and accordingly some dream that they hear thunder and earthquake, or some great clashing ;, and sometimes again with an ordi nary and famUiar noise, as if it was close by him.' We have a famous instance of the last, in that voice whereby God appeared unto Adam after he had sinned, and of the former in Job and Elijah. That instance of Adam is set down Gen. iii. 8, 9. " And they heard the voice of the Lord God, walking in the garden in the cool ofthe day, and Adam hid him self from the presence of the Lord God amongst the -trees of the garden : and the Lord God called unto * Maam. iii. cap. 11. f More Nev. Part II. cap. 44. 220 OF PROPHECY. Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?" Where those words =vn nn which we render "the cool of the day," the Jews expound of ' a gentle vocal air,' such a one as breathed in the day-time more pa- cately. For this appearance of God to him they suppose to be. in a prophetical vision ; and so Nach- manides comments upon those words, sy\"\\ oyiDi '¦di ptm rrrna nn win m^rwrr nV?:im -o Di^rr the sense of this [msn rrn1? in the gale of the day] is, 'that ordinarily in the manifestation of tlie Shechinah or divine presence, there comes a great and mighty wind to usher it in, according to what we read of Elijah, " And behold, the Lord passed by, and a great and strong wind rent the mountains, and brake in pieces the rocks before the Lord :"* and in Psalm xvui. 10. and elsewhere, "He flew upon the wings of the wind :" accordingly it is written con cerning Job, that " the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind."t Wherefore by way of distinction it is said in this place, that " they heard the voice of the Lord," that is, that the divine majesty was revealed to them in the garden, as approaching to them, in the gale of the day. For the wind of the day blew according to the manner of the day-time in the garden ; not as a great and strong wind in this vision, (as it was in other prophetical ap proaches) lest they should fear and be dismayed.' This mighty voice we also find recorded as rousing up the attention of Ezekiel, " He cried also in mine ears with a loud voice, saying,"t &c. So that aU these schemes are merely prophetical, and import nothing else but the strong awakening and quick- * 1 Kings xix, 11. f Job. xxxviii. 1. f Ezek. ix. 1. OF PROPHECY. 221 ening of the prophet's mind into a lively sense of the divine majesty appearing to him. And of these the Apocalypse is full, there being indeed no prophetical writ, where the whole dra matical series of things, as they were acted over in the mind of the prophet, are more graphically and to the Hfe set forth. So we have this vox pra?centrix to the whole scene sometimes sounding like a trum pet, " I was in the spirit on the Lord's day, and heard behind me a great voice as of a trumpet."* And upon the beginning of a new vision we find this prologue, " I looked, and behold a door was opened in heaven : and the first voice which I heard was as it were the sound of a trumpet, talking with me, which said, Come up hither," &c.t And when a new act of opening the seals begins, he is excited by another voice sounding like thunder. " And I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seals, and I heard as it were the noise of thunder, one ofthe four beasts saying, Come and see."t And " voices, and thunders, and lightnings, and an earthquake" § are the procemium to the vision of the seven angels with seven trumpets. Lastly, to name no more, sometimes it is brought in sounding like the roaring of a lion. So when he was to receive the little book of prophecy, " an angel cried with a loud voice, as when a lion roareth ; and when he had cried, seven thunders uttered their voices."|| Hence it is that we find the prophets ordinarily prefacing to their visions in this manner, " The hand of the Lord was upon me ;" that is indeed some potent * Rev. i. 10. f Ibid. chap. iv. 1. \ Ibid. chap. vi. 1. § Ibid. chap. viii. 5. || Ibid. chap. x. 3. 222 OF PROPHECY. force rousing them up to a lively sense of the di vine majesty, or some heavenly ambassador speak ing with them. And that the sense hereof might be the more energetical, sometimes in a prophetical vision they are commanded to eat those prophetic rolls given them, which are described with the great est contrariety of taste that may be, " sweet as honey in their mouths, and. in their beUies as bitter as gall."* Thus we have seen in part how those impres sions, by which the prophets were made partakers of divine inspiration, carried a strong evidence of their original along with them, whereby they might be able to distinguish them both from any hallucin ation, as also from their own true dreams, which might be 'hebirepra sent by God, but not prophetical : which yet I think is more universally unfolded in Jer. xxiii. where the difference between true divine inspiration and such false dreams and visions as sometimes a lying spirit breathed into the false pro phets, is on set purpose described to us from their different evidence and energy. The pseudo-pro phetical spirit being but chaff, ver. 28. as vain as vanity itself, subject to every wind : the matter it self indeed, which was suggested in such, tending to nourish immorality and profaneness ; and besides, for the manner of inspiration, it was more dilute and languid. Whereas true prophecy entered upon the mind " as a fire," and " Hke a hammer that break- eth the rock in pieces :" ver. 29. and therefore the true prophets might know themselves to have re ceived command from heaven, when the false might, * Rev. x. 9. Ezek. ii. 9. OF PROPHECY. 228 if they would have laid aside their own fond self- conceit, have known as easily that God sent them not. For so 1 think those words are spoken by way of conviction, and to provoke a self-condemnation, " Behold, I am against those that prophesy false dreams, saith the Lord, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies and by their lightness ; yet I sent them not, neither commanded them," ver. 32. And this might be evident to them from the feeble nature of those inspirations of which they boasted, as it is insinuated, " The prophet that hath a dream," &c. ver. 28, 29. And thus Abarbanel expounds this place, whose sense I shaU a little the more pursue, because he from hence undertakes to ' solve the difficulty of that question which we are now upon, and thus speaks of it as a question of very great moment. '«i ntnaan nyjD npinj? rhvao rrajca i. e. ' Certainly it is one of the profoundest ques tions that are made concerning prophecy, and I have inquired after the opinion of the wise men of our nation about it.' What answer they gave to this question which he anxiously inquired after, it seems he tells us not, but his own answer which he ad heres to, he founds upon those words, jii^-nn "OrrnN " What is the chaff to the wheat?" T — V ver. 28. And upon this occasion he says that old rule of the Jews was framed, of which we formerly spoke, 'As there is no wheat without chaff, so nei ther is there any dream without something that is agybv, void of reality and insignificant.' Maimo nides here in a general way resolves the business, nsiajsincr *««£ jnn nsoajn {. e, < All prophecy makes itself known to the prophet, that it is prophecy in deed.' Which general solution Abarbanel having 224 OF PROPHECY. a little examined, thus coUects the sense of it, San "sroj r-u'8 -ws6 "wajn or?nn ya iw invna N:*'3Jn abs iniVyan r-uVsni wj-in puna nsnaan nnn w ' Such a thing is the prophetical spirit, by reason of the strength of its impression and the forcibleness of its operation upon the heart of the prophet ; it is even like a thing tliat burns and tears him : and this happens to him either amidst the dream itself, or afterwards when he is fully awakened and rous ed out of tliat prophetical dream. But those dreams which are not prophetical, although they be true, are weak and languid things, easUy blasted as it were with the east wind :' and, as he further goes on by way of allusion, like those dreams that the prophet Isaiah speaks of, " when a hungry man dreams he eats, but when he awakes, behold he is still hungry ; and as when a thirsty man dreams he drinks, but when he is awake he is still thirsty."* * Isa. xxix. 8. OF PROPHECY. 225 And thus also the Chaldee paraphrast, Jer. xxiii. 29. iai v> 1DN N/liy^p PSJffl injjpp to M^rr Nonne om nia verba mea suntfortia sicut ignis, &c. But we have yet another evident demonstration of this no tion which may not be omitted, which is, " Then I said, I will not make mention of him, nor speak any more in his name : . but his word was in mine heart as a burning fire shut up within my bones, and I was weary with forbearing, and I could not stay."* And, " The Lord is with me as a mighty terrible one." ver. 11. With reference to which paragraph, R. Solomon thus glosseth on the for merly-quoted, chap, xxiii. 29. w^ ^a nsauo nsiaj -m n-iya \pk3 '3V3 erd($uaig from a vision which begun upon the prophets while they were awake into a prophe tical dream. So chap. vii. 1. "In the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon, Daniel had a dream, and visions of his head upon his bed ;" and in this dream and night vision, as in the other before- mentioned, a man or angel comes in to expound the matter, ver. 15, 16. " I Daniel was grieved in my spirit in the midst of my body, and the visions of my head troubled me. I came near to one of them that stood by, and asked him the truth of all this : so he told me, and made me know the inter pretation ofthe things." But that the Talmudists do maintain true pro phecy to have been communicated by angels, we shall further confirm from one place which is in Gemara Beracoth, cap. 9. where the doctors are brought in, comparing two places of Scripture, which seem contradictory. One of them is Numb. xii. 6. " In a dream will I speak unto him ;" the other is Zech. x. 2. " They have told false dreams :" which they solve thus. R. Rami said, it is written, "naT wen nroVm a'nai 13 -oik cairns < I wUl speak to him in a dream ; and again, They have told false dreams. Now there is no difficulty at all in this : for the first sort of dreams came by the hand of an angel ;* and the other by an evU ge- nius.'t And this opinion is generaUy followed by -jKbn »t bp * iv "T>b t 232 OF PROPHECY. the rest of the Jewish writers, commentators, and others, who thus compound the difference between those two famous adversaries Nachmanides and Maimonides, by granting a twofold appearance of angels, the one real, and the other imaginary. And so they say this real vision of angels is a degree in ferior to the prophetical vision of them. As we are told by R. Jehudah in the book Cosri ; where having disputed,* what hallowed minds they ought to have who maintain commerce with the Deity, he thus goes on, 'iai nn'Dna pirn =« ' If a man be very pious, and be in those places where the divine in fluence uses to manifest itself, the angels will ac company him with their real presence, and he shall see them face to face ; yet in an inferior way to that vision of angels which accompanies the pro phetical degree. Under the second temple, ac cording as men were more endowed with wisdom, they beheld apparitions, and heard the Bath Col, which is a degree of sanctity, but yet inferior to the prophetical.' To conclude, R. Bechai makes it an article of faith to believe the existence of an gels for this reason, that angels were the furnishers of the prophetical scene, and therefore to deny them was to deny all prophecy ; so he in Parasha Terumah 'iai aa'jj'swn an o'asbn pw ish « because (saith he) the divine ^influx comes by the ministry of angels, who order and dispose the word in the mouth of the prophet according to the mind of God : and if it were not so, there would be no pro phecy ; and if no prophecy, no law. So Jos. Albo, we may remember, defined prophecy by the imme diate orderers of it, the angels. * Maaun. iii. OF PROPHECY. 233 But it is best to consult the Scripture itself in this business, which declares all that way by which it descended from God to the sons of men. The first place which Maimonides* brings for confirma tion of this opinion is that of Gen. xvui. 1. with the exposition of R. Chija,. which he leaves as a great secret. But that which is more for his and our purpose, is Gen. xxxii. 24. where Jacob wrestled all night with the angel ; for so that man was, as Hosea tells us ; and ver. 1. " The angels of God met Jacob." Neither doth this interpretation of that lucta between the angel and Jacob to have been only in a prophetical vision, at all prejudice the historical truth of that event, which was Jacob's halting upon his thigh : for that is no very unusual thing at other times to have some real passions in our bodies, represented to us in our dreams than when they first begin. Another place is Josh. v. 13. " Joshua lifted up his eyes and looked, and be hold a man stood over against him." Again, De borah attributes the command she had to curse Meroz, to an angel : " Curse ye Meroz, said the angel of the Lord :"t which words Kimchi would have to be understood in a literal sense, nn'n n«'3J 'a pit pvrox nsoajn '3 Syi n-vm « for Deborah was a pro phetess, and so spake according to prophetical in spiration ;' and so Rabbi Levi Ben Gersom also ex pounds it : Onkelos and Rasi, with less reason, I think, make this angel to be none else but Baruch. Though I am not ignorant that sometimes the pro phets themselves are called angels of God, and thence Malachi, the last of them, had his name ; yet - More Nev. Part II. dap. 42. t 3u&g. v. 25. o.s 234 OF PROPHECY. we have no such testimony concerning Baruch, that ever he was a prophet, but only a judge or commander of the military forces. In the first book of Kings, chap. xix. 11, 12. we have a large description of this, imaginary appearance of angels in the several modes of it ; " Behold the Lord passed by, and a great and strong wind rent the mountains, and brake in pieces the rocks before the Lord ; but the Lord was not in the wind : and after the wind an earthquake, and after the earthquake a- fire," &c. All which appearances Jonathan the Targumist expounds by ON^n ni_iu>0 'Armies of angels,' which were attended with those terrible phenomena. And the still voice in which the Lord was, he renders answerably to the rest by prQ^'q^ "?;? "'wrn ' the voice of angels praising God in a gentle kind of harmony.' For though it be there said that the Lord was in the soft voice, yet that paraphrast seems to understand it only of his embassador : which in some other places of Scripture is very manifest; as in 2 Kings i. 3, 15, 16. where ver. 3. we find the angel delivered to Elijah the message to Ahaziah king of Israel, who sent to Baal-zebub the god of Ekron to inquire about his disease ; " But the angel ofthe Lord said to Elijah the Tish- bite, Arise, go up to meet the messengers of the king of Samaria, and say unto them, Is it not be-' cause there is not a God in Israel, that ye go to inquire of Baal-zebub." And ver. 16, we have all this message attributed to God himself by the pro phet, as if he had received the dictate immediately from God himself. And in Daniel, the Apocalypse, and Zachariah, we find all things perpetually repre sented and interpreted by angels. And Abarbanel OF PROPHECY. 235 upon Zach. ii. tells us that several prophets had several angels that delivered the heavenly embassy to them, for that every prophet was not so well fitted to converse with any kind of angel : *"» ra 'iai pawn Sap? j3in h*aj < Every prophet was not in a fit capacity of receiving prophetical influence from any angel indifferently ; but according to the dis position of the receiver, the degree and quality of the angel was accommodated.' But I shall not fur ther pursue this argument. In the general, that the prophetical scene was perpetually ordered by some angel, I think it is evident from what hath been already said, which I might further confirm from Ezekiel, all whose prophecies about the tem ple are expressly attributed to a man as the actor of them, that is indeed an angel ; for so they used constantly to appear to the prophets in a human shape. And likewise in Jacob's vision of a ladder that reached up to heaven,* we find the angels as cending and descending, to intimate that this sca- la prophetica, whereby divine influence descended upon the mind of the prophet, is always filled with angels. From this place, compared with Jacob's vision of Laban' s sheep, presented to him by an an- gel,t Philo thus determines in his book vssgi tou Sso- icepirroug sivai roug bvslgoug, Ogag or< ^soir's^irroug bveigoug uvaygdpsi b §Hog kbyog, ou pbvov roug xara rb irgsafiurarov ruv ainuv irgopatvojjJsvoug, dkkd xai roug ruv uiropnruv au- rou xui oTuhuv dyy'ekuv, ' You see how the Scripture represents such dreams as sent of God, not only those that proceed from the first, cause [God], but such also - as come by his ministers, the angels.* * Gen. xxviii. 18. f Gen. xxxi. 11. l 236 OF PROPHECY. But St. Jerome hath given us a more full and am ple testimony in this matter, in his comment on Gal. iii. 19. " The law was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator." His words are these ; Quod autem ait, lex ordinata per angelos, hoc vult intelligi, quod in omni veteri testamento, ubi angelus primum visus refertur, et postea quasi Deus loquens inducitur, angelus quidem vere ex ministris pluribus quicumque sit visus, sed in illo . mediator [Christus^ loquatur qui dicat, Ego sum Deus Abraham, Deus Isaac, et Deus Jacob. Nee mirum si Deus loquatur in angelis, cum etiam per angelos qui in hominibus sunt loquatur Deus in prophetis ; dicente Zacharia, el ait angelus qui loquebatur in me, ac deinceps infe- rente, ha?c dicit Dominus omnipotens. We might further add to all this, those visions we meet with in the New Testament, which, as a thing vulgarly known, were attributed to angels. So Acts xxvii. 23. " There stood by me the an gel of God this night," that is, in a prophetical dream. And Acts xii. when the angel of God did really appear to Peter, and bring him out of prison, he could scarce be persuaded of a long time but that aU this was a vision, this indeed being the common manner of all prophetical vision. And Acts xxiii. when the Pharisees would describe St. Paul as a prophet that had received some vision or revelation from heaven, they phrase it by the speaking of an angel or spirit unto him, " We find no evil in this man ; but if an angel or • spirit hath spoken to him, let us not fight against God," ver. 9. OF PROPHECY. 237 CHAP. VI, The second inquiry, What the meaning qf those actions is thai are frequently attributed to the prophets, whether they were real, or only imaginary and scenical. What actions of the prophets were only imaginary, and performed upon the stage of fancy. What we are to think of several actions and res gestae recorded qf Hosea, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel in their prophecies. JL HUS we have done with our first inquiry con cerning the contriver and orderer of the propheti cal stage : that which was acted upon it, no doubt, every one will grant to have been a masking or imaginary business. But there are many times in the midst of prophetical narrations some things re lated to be done by the prophets themselves upon the command of the prophetic voice, which have been generally conceived to_haye been acted real ly, the grossest of all not excepted, as Hosea's taking a harlot for his wife, and begetting children, &c. Which conceit Mr. Calvin hath in part hap pily undermined. But we shaIT~not here doubt to conclude, both of that and all other actions of the prophets which they were enjoined upon the stage of prophecy, that they were only scenical and ima ginary; except indeed they were such as of their own nature must have a historical meaning, in which an imaginary performance would not serve the turn. For this purpose it may be worth our while to take notice of what Maimonides hath well determined in this case,* Scias ergo,, quemadmodum * More Nev. Part II. cnp. 46. 238 OF PROPHECY. in somnio accidit, &c. ' Know therefore, that as it is in a dream, a man thinks that he hath been in this or that country, that he has married a wife there, and continued there for some certain time, that by this wife he has had a son of such a name, of such a disposition, and the like; know (saith he) that even just so it is with the prophetical para bles, as to what the prophets see or do in a prophe tical vision. For whatsoever those parables inform us concerning any action the prophet doth, or con cerning the space of time between one action and another, or going from one place to another ; all this is in a prophetical vision : neither are these actions real to sense, although some particularities may be precisely reckoned up in the writings of the prophets. For because it was well known that it was all done in a prophetical vision ; it was not necessary in the rehearsing of every particularity to reiterate that it was in a prophetical vision ; as it was also needless to inculcate that it was in a dream. But now the vulgar sort of men think that all such actions, journeys, questions, and answers were really and sensibly performed, and not in a prophetical vision. And therefore I have an in tention to make plain this business, arid shall bring such things as no man shall be able to doubt of; adding thereunto some examples, by which you may be able to judge of the rest which 1 shall not for the present mention.' Thus we see how Mai monides rejects it as a vulgar error to conceive that I those actions which are commonly attributed to the prophets in the current of their prophecy, their , traveUing from place to place, their propounding ] questions, and receiving answers, &c. were real OF PROPHECY. 239 things to sense ; whereas they were only imaginary, represented merely to the fancy. But, for a more distinct understanding of this business, we must remember what hath been often suggested; that the proj)heticaJ^cjene^rvstage up on which aU apparitions were made to the prophet, was his imagination farid that there all those things whicK^God ^ould have revealed unto him were acted over symbolicaUy, as in a masque, in which divers persons are brought in, amongst which the prophet himself bears a part : and therefore he, ac cording to the exigency of this dramatical appara tus, must, as the other actors, perform his part, sometimes by speaking and reciting things done, propounding questions, sometimes by acting that part which in the drama he was appointed to act by some others ; and so, not only by speaking, but by gestures and actions, come in, in his due place, among the rest ; as it is in our ordinary dreams, to use Maimonides' expression of it. And therefore it is no wonder to hear of those things done which' indeed have no historical or real verity ; the scope \ of all being to represent something strongly to the prophet's understanding, and sufficiently to inform it in the substance of those things in which he was to instruct that people to whom he was sent. And so sometimes we have only the inteUigible matter of prophecies delivered to us nakedly, without the imaginary ceremonies "or solemnities. And as this notion of those actions of the prophet that are in- terweaved with their prophecies is most genuine and agreeable to the general nature of prophecy, so we shall further clear and confirm it in some parti culars. 240 OF PROPHECY. We shall begin with that of Hosea's marrying Go- mer, a common harlot, and taking to himself chil dren of whoredoms, which he is said to do a first and second time.* Which kind of action, however it might be void of true vice, yet it would not have been void of all offence, for a prophet to have thus unequally yoked himself (to use St. Paul's expres sion) with any such infamous persons, though by way of lawful wedlock, if it had been really done. I know that this way of interpreting both this and other prophetical actions displeaseth Abarbanel, who thinks the literal sense and historical verity of aU ought to be entertained, except it be onrug ex pressed to have been done in a vision ; and the ge* neral current of our Christian writers, till Calvin's time, have gone the same way. And to- make the literal interpretation here good, R. Solomon and our former author both tell us, that the ancient Rabbins have determined those prophetical narra tions of Hosea to be understood ojrowna < literally,' The place they refer to is, Gem. Pesac. cap. 8. where yet I find no such thing positively concluded by the Talmudists. Indeed they there, after their fashion, expound the place by inserting a long dia logue between God and the prophet about finis matter, but so as that without R. Solomon's or Abarbanel's gloss, we could no more flunk their scope was to establish the literal sense, than I think that the prophet himself intended to insinuate the same to us. We therefore choose to follow Aben- ezra as a more genuine commentator, who in this place, and others of the like nature, follows Mai- * Hos. i. and iii. OF PROPHECY. 241 monides xara itbhag, making all those transactions to have been only imaginary. For though it be not always positively laid down in these narrations, that the res gesta was in a vision ; yet the nature and scope of prophecy, so requiring that things should thus be acted in imagination, we should ra ther expect some positive declaration to assure us that they were performed in the history, if indeed it were so. And therefore in these recitals of prophetical vi sions we find many times things less coherent than can agree to a true history ; as in the narrative* of Abraham's vision, Gen. xv. (for so the Rabbins in Pirke R. EHezer expound that whole chapter to be nothing else) we find ver. 1. that " God appeared to Abraham in a vision," and ver. 5. God brings him into the field as if it were after the shuttfhg up of evening, and shows him the stars of heaven : and yet for all this it was yet daytime, and the sun not gone down : " And when the sun was going down, a deep sleep fell upon Abraham ;" ver. 12. " And it came to pass that when the sun went down and it was dark, behold a smoking furnace, and a burning lamp that passed between those pieces." ver. 17. From whence it is manifest, that Abra ham's going out into the field before to take a view of the stars of heaven, and his ordering of those several living creatures, ver. 9, 10. for a sa crifice, was all performed in a prophetical vision, and upon the stage of his imagination :_ it being no strange thing to have incoherent junctures of time made in such a way. So in Jer. xiii. we have a very precise narrative of Jeremiah's getting a linen girdle, and putting it Hh 242 OF PROPHECY. upon his loins ; and after a while he must needs take a long journey to Euphrates, to hide it there in a hole of the rock ; and then returning, after many days makes another weary journey to the same place to take it out again after it was all cor rupted : all which could manifestly be nothing else but merely imaginary ; the scope thereof being to imprint this more deeply upon the understanding of the prophet, that the house of Judah and Israel, which was nearly knit and united to God, should be destroyed and ruined. The same prophet, chap, xviii. is brought in going to the house of a potter, to take notice how he wrought a piece of work upon the wheel ; and when the vessel he intended was all marred, that then he made of his clay another vessel. And chap. xix. he is brought in as taking the ancients of the people and the ancients of the priests along with him into the valley of the son of Hinnom, with a potter's earthen bottle under his arm, and there breaking it in pieces in the midst of them. In this last chapter it is very observable how the scheme of speech is altered, when the prophet re lates a real history concerning himself, ver. 14. speaking of himself in the third person, as if now he were to speak of somebody else, and not of a prophet or his actions ; for so we read ver. 14. " Then came Jeremiah from Tophet," &c. The like change of the person we find chap, xxviii. 10. where a formal story is told of some things that passed between Jeremiah and Hananiah the false prophet, who, in the presence of all the people, broke Jeremiah's yoke from off his neck : for it seems to have been a wonted thing for the pro- OF PROPHECY. 243 phets by bonds and yokes to type out unto the peo ple victory or captivity in war. Not unlike is that we read of Zedekiah the false prophet, who made himself horns of iron, when he prophesied to Ahab his prosperity against the Syrians at Ramoth-GUead, vulgarly to represent to him the success he should have against his enemies.* But in aU this business the mode of Jeremiah's language insinuates a literal sense, by speaking altogether in the third person, as if the relation concerned somebody else, and not himself; and so must be of some real thing, and that which to sense and observation had its reality, and not only a reality in apprehension or imagina tion. So chap, xxxii. we seem to have an insinua tion of a real history in Jeremiah's purchase of a field of Hanameel his uncle's son, from the mode of expression which is there observable. But at other times we meet with things graphi caUy described with all the circumstantial pomp of the business, when yet it could be nothing else but a dramatical thing ; as chap. xxxv. where the pro phet goes and finds out the chief of the Rechabites particularly described, and brings them into such a particular chamber as is there set forth by all its bounds, and there sets pots and cups full of wine before them, and bids them drink. Just in the same mode with this we have another story "told, chap. xxv. 15, 17. &c. of his taking a wine cup from God, and his carrying it up and down to all nations far and near, Jerusalem, and the cities of Judah, and the kings and princes thereof; to Pha raoh king of Egypt, his servants, princes, and peo- * 1 Kins-i xxii. 244 OF PROPHECY. pie ; to all the Arabians, and kings of the land of Uz ; to the kings of the land of the Philistines, Edom, Moab, Ammon ; the kings of Tyre and Sidon, and of the isles beyond the sea, Dedan, Tema, Buz ; the kings of Zimri, of the Medes and Persians, and all the kings of the north : and all these he said he made to drink of this cup. And in this fashion, chap, xxvii. he is sent up and down with yokes, to put upon the necks of several kings : all which can have no other sense than that which is merely imaginary, though we be not told that all this was acted only in a vision, for the nature of the thing would not permit any real performance thereof. The like we must say of Ezekiel's res gesta?, his eating a roll given him of God, chap. iii. And chap. iv. it is especially remarkable how ceremoni ously aU things are related concerning his taking a tile, and pourtraying upon it the city of Jerusalem, and his laying siege to it ; all which I suppose will be evident to have been merely dramatical, if we carefully examine all things in it, notwithstanding that God tells him he should in all this be a " sign to the people." Which is not so to be understood, as if they were to observe in such real actions in a sensible way, what their own fates should be : for he is here commanded to He continuaUy be fore a tile three hundred and ninety days, which is full thirteen months; upon his left side, and after that forty more upon his right, and to bake his bread that he should eat all this whUe with dung, &c. So chap. v. he is commanded to take a, barber's razor, and to shave his head and beard, then to OF PROPHECY. 245 weigh his hair in a pair of scales, and divide it into three parts ; and after the days of his siege should be fulfilled, spoken of before, then to. burn a third part of it in the midst of the city, and to smite about the other third with a knife, and to scatter the other third to the wind. All which, as it is most unlikely in itself ever to have been really done, so was it against the law of the priests, to shave the corners of their heads and the corners of their beards, as Maimonides observes. But that Ezekiel himself was a priest, is manifest from chap. i. 3. Upon these passages of Ezekiel, Mai monides hath thus soberly given his judgment,* Absit ut Deus prophetas suos stultis vel ebriis similes reddat, ebsque stultorum aut juriosorum actiohes facere jubeat: pra?terquam quod prceceptum illud ultimum legi repugnasset, he. ' Far be it from God to render his prophets like to fools and drunken men, and to prescribe them the actions of fools and mad men : besides that this last injunction would have been inconsistent with the law ; for Ezekiel was a great priest, and therefore obliged to the observa tion of those two negative precepts, viz. of not shaving the corners of his head and corners of his beard : and therefore this was done only in a pro phetical vision.' The same sentence likewise he passeth upon that story of Isaiah, chap. xx. 3. his walking naked and barefoot, wherein Isaiah was no otherwise a sign to Egypt and Ethiopia, or rather Arabia, where he dwelt not, and so could not more HteraUy be a type therein, than Ezekiel was here to the Jews. * More Nev. Part II. eap. 46. 246 OF PROPHECY. Again, chap. xii. we read of Ezekiel's removing his household stuff in the night, as a type of the captivity, and of his digging with his hands through the wall of his house, and of the people's coming to take notice of this strange action, with many other uncouth ceremonies of the whole business which carry no show of probability : and yet, ver. 6. God declares upon this to him, " I have set thee for a sign to the house of Israel ;" and ver. 9. " Son of man, hath not the house of Israel, the re bellious house, said unto thee, What doest thou ?" As if all this had been really done ; which indeed seems to be nothing else but a prophetical scheme. Neither was the prophet any real sign, but only imaginary, as having the type of all those fates which were to befaU the Jews symbolically repre sented in his fancy : which sense Kimchi, a genuine commentator, foUows, with the others mentioned. And it may be, according to this same notion is that in chap. xxiv. to be understood, of the death of the prophet's wife, with the manner of those fu neral solemnities and obsequies which he performed for her. But we shaU proceed no further in this argu ment, which I hope is by this time sufficiently cleared, that we are not, in any prophetical narra tives of this kind, to understand, any thing else but the history of the visions themselves which ap peared to them, except we be led by some farther argument of the reality of the thing in a way of sensible appearance to determine it to have been any sensible thing. OF PROPHECY. 247 CHAP. VIL Of that degree qf divine inspiration properly called Ruach hakko- desh, i. e. The Holy Spirit. The nature qf it described out qf Jewish antiquities. Wherein this Spiritus Sanctus differed from prophecy, strictly so called, and from the spirit of holiness in purified souls. What books qf the Old Testament were ascribed- by the Jews to Ruach hakkodesh. Of the Urim and Thum- mim. J. HUS we have done with that part of divine in spiration, which was more technically and properly by the Jews called prophecy. We shall now a little search into that which is Hagiographical, or, as they call it, the dictate of the Holy Spirit ; in which the Book of Psalms, Job, the works of Solomon and others are comprised. This we find very ap positely thus defined by Mjunonides,* Cum homo in se sentit rem vel facultatem quampiam exoriri, et super se quiescere, qua? eum impellit ad loquendum, Sec. ' When a man perceives some power to arise within him, and rest upon him, which urgeth him to speak, so that he discourse concerning, the sciences or arts, and utter psalms or hymns, or pro fitable and wholesome rules of good living, or mat ters political and civil, or such as are divine ; and that whilst he is waking, and hath the ordinary vigour and use of his senses ; this is such a one of whom it is said, that he speaks by the Holy Spirit.' In this definition we may seem to have the strain of the Book of Psalms, Proverbs, and Ecclesiastes, fully deciphered to us. In like manner we find this, degree of inspiration described by R. Albo,t * More Nev. Part 11. cap. 45. f Maam. iii. cap. 10. 248 QF PROPHECY. after he had set down the other degrees superior to it, i3Ti ij73E is» =n«n- ia njw k6v tik -w pro «rt6 nns' 'iai nnnn nans « Now to explain to you what is that other door of divine influx, through which none can enter by his own natural ability ; it is when a man utters words of wisdom, or song, or divine praise, in pure and elegant language, besides his wont : so that every one that knows him, ad mires him for this excellent knowledge and com posure of words ; but yet he himself knows not from whence this faculty came to him, but is as a chUd that learns a tongue, and knows not from whence, he had this faculty. Now the excellence of this degree of divine inspiration is well known to all, for it is the same with that which is caUed the Holy Spirit.' Or, if you please, we shall render these definitions of our former Jewish doctors in the words of Proclus, who hath very happily set forth the nature of this piece of divine inspiration, ac cording to their mind, in these words,* ' Q he %agax.- rrjg ivSouataartxbg, hiukdpiruv ralg voegaig iirifiokaTg, xa%a- gbg re xai aepvbg, ug airb irargbg reksiou(jbsvog ruv &suv, efyftkayybsvog re xai viregeyuv ruv dv^guirivuv ivvoiuv, afi- go? hs b[tiOu xai xarairknxnxbg, xai yagiruv avd^sarog, xdkkoug rs irkrjgng, xai auvropbog apa xai dirnxgi$w\xkvog, ' This degree or enthusiastical character, shining so bright with the inteUectual influences, is pure and venerable, receiving its perfection from the father of the gods, being distinct from human con ceptions, and far transcending them, always con joined with delightfulness and amazement, full of beauty and comeliness, concise, yet withal exceed ing accurate.' * Lib. V. in Plat. Tim. OF PROPHECY.' 219 This kind of divine inspiration therefore was al ways more pacate and serene than the other of prophecy, neither did it so much fatigate and act upon the imagination. For though these Hagio- ' graphi or holy writers ordinarily expressed them selves in parables and simUitudes, which is the pro per work of fancy ; yet they seem only to have made use of such a dress of language to set off their own sense of divine things, which in itself was more naked and simple, the more advantage ously, as we see commonly in all other kind of writings. And seeing there was no labour of the imagination in this way of revelation, therefore it was not communicated to them by any dreams or visions, but while they were waking, and their senses were in their fuU vigour, their minds calm ; it breathing upon them, ug iv yaknvri, as Plotinus describes his pious enthusiast ;* 'AgiraaSeig n evfau- aidaag nauyjj iv egn^u xaraardast ysy'svnrai, drgepei rrj aurou ohaia ouhapou diroxkivuv. For indeed this en thusiastical spirit seated itself principally in the higher and purer faculties of the soul, whichw^re uairsg dvrauysia irgbg auynv, that I may allude to the ancient opinion of Empedocles, who held there were two suns, the one archetypal, which was al ways in the inconspicable hemisphere of the world, but the beams thereof shining upon this world's sun, were reflected to us, and so further enlighten ed us. Now this kind of inspiration, as it always acted pious souls info strains of devotion, or moved them strongly to dictate matters of true piety and good- * Enn. VI. -Lib. ix. cap. 11. I i 250 OF PROPHECY. ness, did manifest itself to be of a divine nature : and as it came in abruptly upon the minds of those holy men without courting their private thoughts, but transported them from that temper of mind they were in before, so that they perceived them selves captivated by the power of some higher light than that which their own understanding common ly poured out upon them, they might know it to be more immediately from God. For indeed, that seems to be the main thing wherein this holy spirit differed from that constant spirit and frame of holiness and goodness dwelling in hallowed minds, that it was too quick, potent, and transporting a thing, and was a kind of vital form to that light of divine reason which they were' perpetually possessed of. And therefore sometimes it runs out info a foresight or prediction of things to come, though, it may be, those previsions were less understood by the prophet himself; as we might instance if it were needful, in some of Da vid's prophecies, which seem to have been revealed to him not so much for himself (as the apostle speaks) as for us. But it did not always spend it self in strains of devotion or dictates of virtue, wisdom, and prudence ; and therefore, if I may take leave here to express my conjecture, I should think the ancient Jews called this degree Spiritus Sanctus, not because it flows from the third person in the Trinity, which I doubt they thought not of in this business, but because of the near affinity and alliance it hath with that spirit of holiness and true goodness that always lodgeth in the breasts of good men. And this seems to be insinuated in an old proverbial speech of the Jewish masters, quoted by OF PROPHECY. 251 Maimonides in the forecited place, Majestas Divina habitat super eum, et loquitur per Spiritum Sanctum. Though some think it might be so caUed as being the lowest degree of divine inspiration : for some times the most ancient monuments of Jewish learn ing call all prophecy by the name of Spiritus Sanctus. So in Pirke R. Eliezer, cap. 39. R. Phineas inquit, requievit Spiritus Sanctus super Josephum ab ipsius juventute usque ad diem obitus ejus, atque direxit eum in omnem sapientiam, &c. ' The Holy Spirit rested upon Joseph from his youth till the day of his death, and guided him into all wisdom,' &c. Though it may be all that might be but a Hagio- graphical spirit : for indeed the Jews are wont, as we showed before, to distinguish Joseph's dreams from prophetical. But this Spiritus Sanctus in the same chapter, to put all out of doubt, is attributed to Isaiah and Ezekiel, which were known prophets : and chap, xxxiii. R. Phineas ait, postquam omnes illi interfecti fuerant, viginti annis in Babel requievit Spiritus Sanctus super Ezekielem, et eduxit eum ex convalle Dora, et ostendit ei multa ossa, &c. And among those five things that the Jews always sup posed the second temple to be inferior to. the first in, one was the want of the isnipn nn Spiritus Sanc tus, or spirit of prophecy. But we are here to consider this Spiritus Sanctus more strictly, and as we have formely defined it out of Jewish antiquity. And here we shall first show what books of the Old Testament were ascribed to this degree by the Jews. The Old Testament was by the Jews divided into cs'awai cars'aj prnn ' the law, the prophets, and the dyibygapa.' And this division is insinuated in Luke xxiv. 44. " And 252 OF PROPHECY. Jesus said unto them, these are the words which I spake unto you while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled which were written con cerning me in the law of Moses, and in the pro phets, and in the Psalms :" where, by the Psalms, may seem to be meant the Hagiographa ; for the writers of these Hagiographa might be termed psalmodists for some reasons which we shall touch upon hereafter in this discourse. But to return ; the Old Testament being anciently divided into these parts, it may not be amiss to consider the order of these parts as it is laid down by the Talmudical doctors in Gemara Bava Bathra, cap. 1. towards the end, '«i ys'aj Hw pa p-i un < Our doctors have de livered unto us this order of the prophets, Joshua, Judges, Samuel, Kings, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Isaiah, and the twelve prophets, the first of Which is Hosea,' for so they understand those words in Hos. i. 2. yw'ins n\n) "i?n nVni-i Deus inprimis locutus est per Hoseam. The same Gemarists go on to lay down the order of the dyibygapa thus ; • Ruth, the Book of Psalms, Job, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Canticles, Lamentations, Daniel, Esther, Ezra, the Chroni cles :' And these the Jews did ascribe to the Ruach hakkodesh. But why Daniel • should be reckoned amongst the ca'aina and not amongst ='K'a: 'the prophets,' I can see no reason, seeing the strain of it wholly argues the nature of a propheti cal degree spending itself in dreams and visions, though those were joined with more obscurity (it being then the crepusculum of the prophetical day, which had long been upon the horizon of the Jew ish church) than in the other prophets. And therefore whatever the latter Jews here urge, for OF PROPHECY. 253 thus ranking up Daniel's books with the other D'ama yet seeing they give us no traditional reason which their ancestors had for so doing, I should rather think it to have been first of all some for tuitous thing which gave an occasion to this after- mistake, as I think it is. But to pass on, besides those books mentioned, there were some things else among the Jews usually attributed to this Spiritus Sanctus : and so Maimo nides in the forementioned place teUs us that Eldad and Medad,, and all the high priests who asked counsel by Urim and Thummim, spake per Spiritum Sanctum, so that it was a character enthusiastical whereby they gave judicial answers, by looking upon the stones of the high priest's breastplate, to those that came to inquire of God by them. And so R. Bechai in Parash miyn speaks of ' one of the degrees of the Holy Spirit which was superior to Bath Kol (i. e.filia vocis) and inferior to prophecy.' ia pitas'?! Sip ma ia rhyxh ismpn nn nunn1? ma pvn pisujn It wiU not be amiss by a short digression to show what this Urim and Thummim was : and we may take it out of our former author R. Bechai, who, for the substance, agrees with the generality and best of the Jewish writers herein. It was, as he there tells us, done in this manner. The high priest stood before the ark, and he that came to in quire of the Urim and Thummim stood behind him*. inquiring with a submissive voice, as if he had been at his private prayers, Shall I do so, or so ? Then the high priest looked upon the letters which were engraven upon the stones of the breastplate, and by the concurrence of an enthusiastical spirit of divination of his own (if 1 may add thus much 254 OF PROPHECY. upon the former reasons to that which he there speaks) with some modes whereby those letters ap peared, he shaped out his answer. But for those that were allowed to inquire at this oracle, they were none else but either the king or the whole congregation, as we are told in Massec. Sotah, y* •jbaiKTos *»6k ^kw 'None may inquire of it but the congregation of the people, or the king ;' by which it seems it was a political oracle. But to return to our argument in hand, viz. What pieces of divine writ are ascribed to the icnipn nn or Spiritus Sanctus ; we must further know that the Jews were wont to reckon all those psalms or songs which we any where meet with in the Old Testament among the aa'aina. For though they were penned by the prophets, yet because they were not the proper results of a visum propheticum, therefore they were not true prophecy : for they have a com mon tradition, that the prophets did not always pro phesy eodem gradu, but sometime in a higher, some time in a lower degree, as among others we are ful ly taught by Abarbanel in Is. iv. upon occasion of that song of Isaiah ™hv nma r-nisa -in« mj; sssr ' The same prophet prophesies sometimes in the form of the supreme prophetical degree, and some times in a lower degree, la^a anipn ni-o ik or by the Holy Spirit only.' And thus having made his way, iie tells us that common notion they had amongst them, ' that all songs were dictated by this Spiritus Sanctus,' 'iai O'K'aan nana roinrw r-rw Saicr « Every song that is found in the writings of the prophets, it was such a thing as was ordered or dictated by the pen men themselves, together with the superintendency of the Holy Spirit : forasmuch as they received OF PROPHECY. 255 them not in that higher way which is caUed pro phecy, as all visions were received, for all visions were perfect prophecy.' But the author goes on further to declare his, and indeed the common opi nion, concerning any such song, that it was not the proper work of God himself, but the work of the prophet's own spirit, Syaa ok 'a 'n bjraa w« jabi pvyik -man K'aan. Yet we must suppose the prophet's spirit enabled by the conjunction of divine help with it, as he puts in the caution, "tfjn nn ins niW O'n'rK « the Spirit of God and his divine assistance did stUl cleave unto the prophet, and was present with him.' For, as he tells us, the prophets, being so much accustomed to divine visions as they were, might be able sometime per vigiliam, without any prophetical vision, to speak excellently by the Holy Ghost, 'wan njbsni nvban 'si'3 « with very elegant lan guage, and admirable simUitudes.' And this he there proves from hence, that these songs are com monly attributed to the prophet himself, and not to God, there being so much of the work of the pro phet's own spirit in them, sb ='nbx Tan sinan mon' p1? '1:1 pwia iw tk aan mi'tea -ias pun '3 T,-i3n' avh '.Where fore the Scripture commonly attributes these songs to the prophets themselves, and not unto God ; and accordingly speaks of the song at the Red Sea,* " Then Moses and the people of Israel sang this song," that is, Moses and the chUdren of Israel did compose and order it. So in the song at Beer-Elim, " Then sang Israel this song."t So in Moses' song in the latter end of Deuteronomy, which was to be preserved as a memorial, the conclusion runs, • Exod. xv. 1 — 22. f Num. xxi. 17. 25,6 OF PROPHECY. "Set your hearts upon all those words, Typ *ijN ItpNj Disrr Dpi which I testify to you this day."* So all those psalms which are supposed to have been com posed by David, are perpetually ascribed unto him, and the rest of them that were composed by others- are in like manner ascribed unto them ; whereas the prophetic strain is very different, always en titling God to it, and so is brought in with such kind of prologues, " the word of the Lord," or " the hand of the Lord," or the like. But enough of that : yet seeing we are fallen now upon the original author of these divine songs and hymns, it will not be amiss to take a little no tice of the frequency of this degree of prophecy, which is by songs and hymns composed by an en thusiastical spirit, among the Jews. We find many of these prophets besides David, who were authors of sundry psalms bound up together with his ; for we must not think all are his : as after the 72d Psalm we have eleven together which are ascribed to Asaph, the 88th to Heman, the 89th to Ethan, some to Jeduthun, and very many are incerti au- thoris, as it seems, being anonymous. Thus Kim- chi in his preface to the Psalms, and the rest of the Hebrew scholiasts, suppose divers authors to have come in for their particular songs in that book. And these divine enthusiasts were commonly wont to compose their songs and hymns at the sounding of some one musical instrument or other, as we find it often suggested in the Psalms. So Plutarch,* describes the dictate of the oracle anci ently, dig b fisrgu xai oyxu, xai irkdapuart xai Uisrapogalg * Deut. xxxii. 46. f Lib. ni{l rou /iii ^S.y i/tfiirgx wv rh IlvSiar. OF PROPHECY. .257 ivo\hdruv, xai oat aukou, ' how that it was uttered in verse, in pomp of words, similitudes, and metaphors, at the sound of a pipe.' Thus we have Asaph, Heman, and Jeduthun set forth in this prophetical preparation, " Moreover David and the captain of the host separated to the service of the sons of Asaph, and of Heman, and of Jeduthun, who should prophesy with harps,"* &c. Thus R. Sal. expounds the place, vn iV?n n-w '"?aa cawwn nwa 'iai iwbtsa xaan ca'toana « When they played upon their musical instruments they prophesied, after the manner of Elisha, who said, " Bring me a min strel."! And in the forementioned place, ver. 3. upon those words " who prophesied with a harp," he thus glosseth, rn'ibbn'niatai nsnin'mata -iiraa vjub vrneo- : K3jna m'n <¦ As they sounded upon the harp the psalms of praise and the hallelujahs, Jeduthun their father prophesied.' And this sense of this place I think is much more genuine than that which a late author of our own would fasten upon it, viz. that this prophesying was nothing but singing of psalms. For it is manifest that these prophets were not mere singers, but composers, and such as were truly caUed prophets or enthusiasts : so, ver. 5. Heman is expressly called the king's seer ; the like in 2 Chron. xxix. 30. and xxxv. 15. of Asaph, He- man, and Jeduthun, ifytpn nj/in upon which our for mer commentator glosseth thus, mm pvn insi -inx Sa unusquisque eorum erat propheta. It is true, the poets are anciently called votes, but that is no good argument why a singer should be called a prophet : for it is to be considered that a poet was a com- * 1 Chron. xxv. 1. t - Kings iii. 15. K k 258 OF PROPHECY, poser, and upon that account by the ancients called vates, or a prophet, and that because they generally thought all true poets were transported. So Plato in his Phaedrus makes three kinds of fury, viz. en thusiastical, amatorious, and poetical. But of this matter we shall speak more under the next head, which we are in a manner unawares faUen upon, which is, to inquire in general into the qualification of all kind of prophets. CHAP. VIII. Of the dispositions antecedent and preparatory to prophecy. That the qualifications which did fit a man for the prophetical spirit were such as ttiese, viz. inward piety, true wisdom, a pacate and serene temper of mind, and a due cheerfulness qf spirit ; in op position to viciousness, mental crazedness and inconsistency, un subdued passions, black melancholy, and dull sadness. This illustrated by several instances hi Scripture. That music was greatly advantageous to the prophets and holy men of God, fyc. What is meant by Sauts evil spirit. vJUR next business is to discourse of those sever al qualifications that were to render a man fit for the spirit of prophecy : for we must not think that any man might suddenly be made a prophet : this gift was not so fortuitously dispensed as to be com municated without any discrimination of persons. And this indeed all sorts of men have generally concluded upon ; and therefore the old Heathens themselves, that only sought after a spirit of divina tion, were wont in a solemn manner to prepare and" OF PROPHECY. 259 fit themselves for receiving the influx thereof, as R. Albo hath truly observed,* caw mia-npn niaisn vn 'iai nms « The ancient Gentiles made themselves images, and offered prayers and frankincense to the stars, that by this means they might draw down a spiritual influence from some certain stars upon their image. For this influence slides down from the body of the star upon the man himself, who is also corporeal, and by this means he foretells what shall come to pass.' And thus, as he further ob serves, the necromancers themselves were wont to use many solemn rites an d ceremonies to call forth the souls of any dead men into themselves, where by they might be able to presage future things. But to come more closely to our present argument. The qualifications which the Jewish doctors sup pose necessarUy antecedent to render any one habi- lem ad prophetandum are true probity and piety ; and this was the constant sense and opinion of them all universally, not excluding the vulgar themselves. Thus Abarbanel in Praefat. in 12 Proph. '«aa nn'cn umpn nrh pietas inducit Spiritum Sanctum. The Hke We find in Maimonides,t who yet thinks this was not enough ; and therefore he reckons up this as a vul gar error, which yet he says some of their doctors were carried away withal, Quod Deus aliquem eli- gat et mittat, nulla habita ratione an sit sapiens, &c. ' That God may choose of men whom he pleaseth, and send him, it matters not whether he be wise and learned, or unlearned and unskilful, old or young ; only that this is required, that he be a vir tuous, good, and honest man : for hitherto there * Maam. iii. cap. 8. \ More Nev. Part II. cap. 32. 260 OF PROPHECY. was never any that could say that God did cause the divine majesty to dwell in a vitious person, un less he had first reformed himself.' But Maimonides himself rather prefers the opinion of the wise sages and phUosophers of tlie Heathen than of these vulgar masters, which re quired also some perfection in the nature of him that should be set apart for prophecy, augmented with study and industry ; ' Whence it cannot be that a man should go to bed no prophet, and rise the next day a prophet' (as he there speaks), quem admodum homo qui inopinatb aliquid invenit. And a little after he adds, Fatuos et hujus terra? filios quod attinet, non magis, nostro judicio, prophetare possunt, quam asinus aut rana. These perfections therefore which Maimonides requires as preparatory dispositions to render a man a prophet, are of three sorts, viz. 1. Acquisite or rational; 2. Natural or animal; lastly, Moral. And according to the difference of these he distin guished! the degrees of prophecy, cap. xxxvi. Has autem tres perfectiones, &c. • As to these three perfections which we have here comprised, viz. the perfection of the rational faculty acquired by study, the perfection of the imaginative faculty, by birth, and the perfection of manners or virtuous qualities, by purifying and freeing the heart and affections from all sensual pleasures, from all pride, and from all foolish and pestilent desire of glory; as to these, I say, it is evident that they are differently, and not in the same degree, participated by men : and according to such different measures of parti cipation the degrees of the prophets are also to be distinguished. OF PROPHECY. 261 Thus Maimonides, who indeed in all this did but aim at this technical notion of his, that all prophe cy is the proper result of these perfections, as a form arising out of them all, as out of its elements compounded together. For it is plain that he thought there was a kind of prognostic virtue in souls themselves, which was in this manner to be excited ; which was the opinion of some philoso phers, among which Plutarch lays down his sense in this manner, according to the minds of many others ; 'H -^uyjj rnv \mvnxnv oux iirixrdrat huvafitv ixfidaa rou aufiarog uaireg vsipooj, dkk' sypuaa xai vuv, rupkourai he hid rnv irgbg rb Svyrbv dvdf/ii%iv aurrjg xai auvypaiv,* ' The soul doth not then first of all attain a prophetical energy when it leaves the body as a cloud ; but it now hath it already ; only she is blind of this eye, because of her concretion with this mor tal body.' This philosopher's opinion Maimonides was more than prone to, however he would dissem ble it, and therefore he speaks of an impotency to prophesy, supposing all those three quaHfications named before, as of the suspension of the act of some natural faculty. So, cap. 32. Meo judi cio res hic se habet sicut in miraculis, &c. i. e. ' In my judgment (saith he) the matter here is just so as it is in miracles, and bears proportion with them. For natural reason requires, that he who by his na ture is apt to prophesy, and is diligently taught and instructed, and of fit age, that such a one should prophesy ; but he that notwithstanding can not do so, is like to one that cannot move his hand, as Jeroboam, or one that cannot see, as those that * Lib. Tligi rut IxXiXatvoreti; ^o-nsrnomi. 262 OF PROPHECY. . could not see the tents of the king of Syria, as it is in the story of Elisha.' And again, cap. 36. he further beats upon this string, Si vir quidam ita comparatus fuerit, nullum dubium est, sifacultas ejus imaginatrix (qua? in summo gradu perfecta est, et influentiam ab intellectu secundum perfectionem suam speculativam accipit) laboraverit et in operatione fu erit, ilium non nisi res divinas et admirandas appre- hensurum, nihil pra?ter Deum et ejus angelos visu- rum, nullius denique rei scientiam habiturum et cura- turum, nisi earum qua? vera? sunt et qua? ad commu- nem hominum spectant utilitatem. This opinion of Maimonides I find not any where entertained, only by the author of the book Cozri. That which seems to have led him into this conceit, was his mistaken sense (it may be) of some passages in the story of the kings that speak of the schools of the prophets, and the like, of which more hereafter. But 1 know no reason sufficient to infer any such thing as the prophetical spirit from the highest im provement of natural or moral endowments. And I cannot but wonder how Maimonides" could recon cile all this with the right notion of prophecy, which must of necessity include a divine inspira tion, and therefore may freely be bestowed by God where and upon whom he pleaseth. Though in deed common reason will teach us, that it is not likely that God would extraordinarily inspire any men, and send them thus specially authorized by himself to declare his mind authentically to them, and dictate what, his truth was, who were them selves vitious and of unhallowed lives ; and so in deed the apostle Peter tells us plainly, they were " holy men of God, who spake as they were moved OF PROPHECY. 263' by the Holy Ghost."* Neither is it probable that those who were any way of crazed minds, or who were inwardly of inconsistent tempers by reason of any perturbation, could be very fit for these serene impressions. A troubled fancy could no more re ceive these ideas of divine truth to be imprest upon it, and clearly reflect them to the understanding, than a cracked glass or troubled water can reflect sincerely any image to be made upon them. And therefore the Hebrew doctors universaUy agree in this rule, that the spirit of prophecy never rests upon any but a holy and wise man, one whose pas sions are allayed. So the Talmud Massec. Sanhe- drin, as it is quoted by R. Albo,t ^k paw n«ia:n y« maip Sjni wj?i -iia'j ana hy i. e. « The spirit of pro phecy never resides but upon a man of wisdom and fortitude, as also upon a rich and great man.' The two last qualifications in this rule Maimo nides in his Fundamenta Legis hath left out, and in deed it is full enough without them. But those other two qualifications of wisdom and fortitude are constantly laid down by them in this argument. And so we find it ascribed to the author of. this canon, who is said to be R. Jochanan,t y* pi' 'n "»k '131 wraiy mum ns "pn i. e." ' R. Jochanan says, God doth not make his Shechinah to reside upon any but a rich and humble man, a man of fortitude, aU which we learn from the example of Moses our master.' Where by fortitude they mean nothing else but that power whereby a good man subdues his animal part; for so I suppose I may safely translate that solution of their's which. I have * 2 Pet. i. 21. f Maam. iii. cap. 10. f Gem. Nedar. cap. i. 264 OF PROPHECY. sometimes met with, and I think in Pirke Avoth, 'a inn -«' j?3ian -nan ' Who is the man of fortitude ? It is he that subdues his figmentum malum,' 'by which they meant nothing else but the sensual or animal part : of which more in another discourse. And thus they give us another rule as it were paraphras- tical upon the former, which I find Gem. Schab. cap. 2. where, glancing at that contempt which the wise man in Ecclesiastes cast upon mirth and laughter, they distinguish a twofold mirth, the one divine, the other mundane, and then sum up many of these mundane and terrene affections with which this Holy Spirit will not reside Tina Kb mm nraw n*1? '131 'pinur ^na r^i miVsj? -pna njSi missy « The Divine presence, or Spiritus Sanctus, doth not reside where there is grief and dull sadness, laughter and light ness of behaviour, impertinent talk or idle dis course ; but with due and innocuous cheerfulness it loves to reside, according to that which is writ ten concerning Elisha, " Bring me now a minstrel : and it came to pass when the minstrel played, the hand of the Lord was upon him."* Where we see that temper of mind principally required by. them is a free cheerfulness, in opposition to all griefs, anger, or any other sad and melancholy passions.' So Gem. Pesac. cap. 6. 'in can ate oina nvw ante ha uaa mpbnDa inteiaj 'in ss'aj as uaa mpSnoa inaan <¦ Every man when he is in a passion, if he be a wise man, his wisdom is taken from him ; if a prophet, his prophecy.' The first part of this aphorism they there declare by the example of Moses, who they say prophesied * 2 Kings iii. 15. OF PROPHECY. 265 not in the wUderness after the return of the spies that brought an ill report of the land of Canaan, by reason of his indignation against them : and the last part from the example of the prophet Elisha,* of which more hereafter. Thus in the book Zohar, wherein most ofthe ancient Jewish traditions are recorded,t 'wi 'ia'!Jj? nn«3 snip nj1? sru'3itn warn sn ' Behold, we plainly see that the divine presence doth not reside with sadness, but with cheerfulness : if there be no cheerfulness, it will not abide there ; as it is written concerning EHsha, who said, " Give me now a minstrel." But from whence learn we that the Spirit of God will not reside with heavi ness ? From the example of Jacob, for all the while he grieved for Joseph, the Shechinah, or the Holy Spirit did forsake him.' They had also a common tradition, that Jacob prophesied not that time while his grief for the loss of his son Joseph remained with him. So L. Tosiphta, miasy •yna mw m'sv y* mnaur -]ma sb« <¦ The spirit of prophecy dwells not with sadness, but with cheerfulness.' I wiU not here dispute the punctualness of these traditions concerning Moses and Jacob, though I doubt not but the main scope of them is true, viz. that the spirit of prophecy used not to reside with any black or melancholy passions, but required a serene and pacate temper of mind, it being itself of' a mild and gentle nature ; as it was well observed con cerning the Holy Ghost in another notion by Ter tullian in his De Spectaculis, Deus pra?cepit Spiritum Sanctum, utpote pro natura? sua? bono tenerum et delicatum, tranquillitate et lenitate, et * 2 Kings iii. 1.5. t Co1- 408' LI 266 OF PROPHECY. quiete et pace traclare ; non furore, non bile, non ira, non dolore inquietare. Now, according to this notion, I think we have gained some light for the further understanding of some passages in the fifty-first Psalm, which the Chaldee paraphrast and Hebrew commentators also understand of the spirit of prophecy, which was taken from David in that time of his sorrow and grief of mind, upon the reflection of his shameful miscarriage in the matter of Uriah ; and this is called nana nn « a free spirit," ver. 12. or a spirit of alacrity and liberty of mind, acting by generous and noble and free impulses upon it : and it is paraphrased by "joy and gladness," ver. 8. as being that temper of mind which it most liberally moved and acted upon ; as likewise a like periphrasis is used of it, " the joy of God's salvation;" ver. 12. and David thus prayeth for the restoration of it to him, and the establishing him in the firm possession of it, " Create in me a clean heart, O God, wnn |i33 nTY} " ¦>2"\p2 and renew a fixed spirit within me." ver. 10. As if he had said, Thy Holy Spirit of prophecy dwells in no unhallowed minds, but with purity and holiness ; and when these are violated, that presently departs ; the holy and the impure spirit cannot converse together : therefore cleanse my heart of all pollution, that this divine guest, being restored to me, may find a constant habitation within me. And thus both Rasi and Abenezra gloss on this place, but especially R. Kimchi, who pursues this sense very largely : and so before them the Talmudists had expounded it,* where * Gem. Joma. cap. 2. OF PROPHECY. 267 they thus descant upon those words, " Take not thy Holy Spirit from me," ver. 11. and tell us how David was punished by leprosy and double excom munication ; one from this spirit, "i'" inni a'ltnn rwv i-iraip ua'n mpVnoji imnja uan iunsi which words I find most corruptly translated by Vorstius in his Com ment upon Maimonides' Fundamenta Legis. I should therefore thus render them in their native and genuine sense, Per sex menses erat David le- prosus (viz. propter peccatum in negotio Uria? ad- missum,) et separabant se ab eo viri synagoga? magna?, atque ablata est ab eo Shechinah (i. e. spiritus pro- pheticus.J Primum constat ex Psalm cxix. ubi dici tur, Revertantur ad me timentes te, et scientes testimo- nia tua : alterum ex Psalm li. ubi dicitur, Foe rever- tatur ad me hetitia salutis tua?. But it is now time to look a little into that place which the masters constantly refer to in this notion, viz. 2 Kings iii. where, when the kings of Israel, and Judah, and Edom, in their distress for water, upon their warlike expedition against the king of Moab, came to Elifcha to inquire of God by him, the prophet seems to have been moved with indignation against the king of Israel, and so makes a very unwelcome address to him, " Surely were it not that I regard the presence of Jehosa- phat the king of Judah, I would not look toward thee, nor see thee :" ver. 14. and then it follows, " But now bring me a minstrel : and it came to pass when the minstrel played, that the hand of the Lord came upon him." ver. 15. Which words are thus expounded by R. D. Kimchi, out of the Rabbins, (with which R. S. Jarchi, and R. L. Ben Gersom agree for the substance of his meaning) 268 OF PROPHECY. 'iai nns pbnwttr avaa matt « Our doctors tell us, that from that day wherein his master Elijah was taken up into heaven, the spirit of prophecy remained not with him for a certain time ; for, for this cause he was very sorrowful, and the divine Spirit doth not reside with heaviness.' Others say that by reason of the indignation he conceived against the king of Israel, he was ' disquieted in his mind ;' and touching this they say, ' that whensoever a prophet is disturbed through anger or passion, the Holy Spirit forsakes him.' From whence learn we this ? From the example of EHsha, who said, "Give me a minstrel." Thus we may by this time see the reason why musical ^^instruments were so frequently used by the prophets, especially the hagiographi ; which indeed seems to be nothing else but that their minds might be thereby put into a more composed, liberal, and cheerful temper, and so the better disposed and fitted for the transportation of the prophetical spi rit. So we have heard before out of 1 Chron. xxv. how Asaph, Heman, and Jeduthun composed their divine poems at the sound of the choir music of the temple. Another famous place we find for this purpose, 1 Sam. x. which place, as well as the for mer, hath been, I think, much mistaken and misin terpreted by some of singing ; whereas certainly it cannot be meant of any thing less than divine poe try, and a composure of hymns excited by a divine energy, inwardly moving the mind. In that place, Samuel having anointed Saul king of Israel, to as sure him that it was so ordained of God, he teUs him of some events that should occur to him a Ht tle after his departure froni him ; whereof this is OF PROPHECY. 269 one, that meeting with some prophets, he himself should find the impulses of a prophetical spirit also moving in him. These prophets are thus described, " After that, thou shalt come to the hill of God, &c. and it shaU come to pass when thou art come thither to the city, that thou shalt meet a company of prophets coming down from the high place, with a psaltery, and a tabret, and a pipe, and a harp be fore them ; and they shaU prophesy. And the Spirit of the Lord shall come upon thee, and thou shalt prophesy with them, and shalt be turned into another man." ver. 5, 6. Where this music which they were accompanied with, was to vigorate and compose their minds, as Kimchi comments upon the place, t^s row ro'K enpn nn 'a -iuai W?m *|ini ha: ssvish"1 '131 mnaic yno < And before them was a psaltery (or lute), and a tabret, and a pipe, and a harp : foras much as the Holy Spirit dwells no where but with alacrity and cheerfulness : and they prophesied, that is, as Jonathan the Targumist expounds it, they praised God : as if he had said, their prophecies were songs and praises to God, uttered by the Holy Ghost.' Thus he. Now as this divine spirit thus acted free and cheerful souls, so the evU spirit actuated sad, melan choly minds, as we heard before, and as we may see in the example of Saul. And indeed that evU spirit which is said to have possessed him, seems to be nothing else originally but anguish and grief of mind, however wrought upon by some tempting in sinuations of an evU spirit. And this sometimes instigated him to prophesy after the fashion of such melancholy fury : " And it came to pass on the morrow, that the evil spirit from God came upon 270 OF PROPHECY. Saul, and he prophesied in the midst ofthe house ;"* which Jonathan renders by Kno ua nsnwK insanivit in medio domus, or, as Kimchi expounds the para- phrast, mioitr nan -arm pvn locutus est verba stultitia?. So also R. Solom. upon this place expounds it to the same purpose. So that, according to the strain of all the Jewish scholiasts, by this evil spirit of Saul nothing else is here meant but a melancholy kind of madness, which made him prophesy, or speak distractedly and inconsistently. To these we may add R. L. B. Gersom, inn nn ma'oa anabna a'-on m'an fina -arva pvn ' He spake in the midst of the house very confus edly, by reason of that evil spirit.' Now as this evU spirit was indeed fundamentally, as I said, nothing else but a sour and distracted temper of mind, arising from the terrene dregs of melancholy, grief, and malice, whereby Saul was at that time vexed ; so the proper cure of it was the harmony and melody of David's music, which was therefore made use of to compose his mind, and to allay these turbulent passions. And that was the reason (as I hope by this time it appears) why this music was so frequently used, viz. to compose the animal part, that aU kind of perturbations being dispelled, and a fine gentle yakrivn or tranquillity ushered in, the soul might be the better disposed for the divine breathings of the prophetical spirit, which enter not at random into any sort of men. Mbvog ydg aopbg ogyavov Qeou ianv nypuv, xgouopsvov xai irknrTO[hevov dogdrug vir' aurou, as Philo hath well expressed it upon this occasion ; these divine breathings enter only into ' 1 Sam. xviii. 10. OF PROPHECY. 271 those minds that were fitly disposed for them by moral and acquisite qualifications. CHAP. IX. Of the sons or disciples qf the prophets. An account qf several . schools of prophetical education, as at Naioth in Rama, at Jeru salem, Bethel, Jericho, GUgal, fyc. Several passages in the historical books qf Scripture pertinent to this argument ex plained. AND therefore we find also frequently such pas sages in Scripture as strongly insinuate to us that anciently many were so trained up in a way of school-discipline, that they might become candidati prophetia?, and were as probationers to these de grees, which none but God himself conferred upon them. Yet while they heard others prophesy, there was sometimes an afflatus upon them also, their souls as it were sympathizing, like unisons in music, with the souls of those which were touched by the spirit. And this seems to be the meaning of that story,* where aU Saul's messengers sent to Naioth in Rama to apprehend David, and at last he himself, are said to fall a prophesying. For it is probable that the prophecies there spoken of were anthems divinely dictated, or doxologies with such elegant strains of devotion and fancy as might also * 1 Sam. xix. 272 OF PROPHECY. excite and stir up the spirits of the auditors : as we often find that any admirable discourses, in which there is a cheerful and free flowing forth of a rich fancy in an intelligible, and yet extraordinary way, are apt to beget a symbolizing quality of mind in a by-stander. And the above-mentioned notion is clearly sug gested by the Jewish writers, who tell us that this Naioth in Rama was indeed a school of prophetical education, and so the Targum expounds the word Naioth, josSik n'a domus doctrina?, i. e. prophetia?. And R. Levi B. G. f r ^« a'te'sib «m» n'a rvrw nate a't«'3:n mnpV <¦ Our masters say that there was a school for the prophets near the city of Ramah, to which the prophets congregated :' ancl to the like purpose R. Solomon. And it is further insinuated that Samuel was the president of this school or col lege ; as disciplining those young scholars, and training them up to those preparatory qualifications which might more fully dispose them for prophe cy ; and also prophesying to them in sacred hymns, or otherwise, whereby their spirits might receive some tincture of a like kind. For so we find it, ver. 20. " And when they saw the company of the prophets prophesying, and Samuel standing as ap pointed over them, the Spirit of God was upon the messengers of Saul, and they also prophesied." Where the Chaldee paraphrast translates DiN^l? or prophesying, by pniwp praising God with sacred hymns and hallelujahs, according to the common strain of the prophetical degree which was called Spiritus Sanctus. And so R. Kimchi and R. Levi B. G. here ascribe it anipn nnS <¦ to the Holy Spirit.' Among these prophets it is said, " Samuel stood as OF PROPHECY. 273 appointed over them," that is, jinvity )^a DN|? ' He stood as a teacher or master over them,' as the Chaldee paraphrast reads it. But R. Levi B. G. strains a little higher, and perhaps too high, yr\h$ hs -wvt nnn ja ysipn < He derived forth from himself, of his own prophetical spirit, by way of emanation, upon them.' Though this kind of lan guage be very suitable to the notions of those mas ters who would fain persuade us that almost all the prophets prophesied by virtue of some influence faying forth from the spirit of some other prophet into them : and Moses himself they make the com mon conduit through whom all prophetical influ ence was conveyed to the rest of the prophets. A conceit, I think, a little too nice and subtile to be understood. But to return, upon this ground we have sug gested, these disciples of the prophets are called a't?'3Jn ya « sons ofthe prophets :' and these are they which are meant* (the place we named before) in those words, ffW"1!? "730 ' a company of the pro phets,' that is, as the Targum renders it, NJ19D nyip coitus scribarum, ' a company of scribes,' for so these young scholars were anciently called ; or if you please rather in Kimchi's language, s-s'nsa nyo a'te'ajn n'aVn vn nto anaia itnpj a'aan n'aSn 'a D'TaSn h'-\ '131 anna ' a company of scribes, that is, scholars : for the scholars of the wise men were called scribes : for they were the scholars of the greater prophets, and. these scholars were called the sons of the prophets. Now the greater prophets which lived in that time from Eli to David were Samuel, Gad, Nathan, Asaph, Heman, and Jeduthun.' * 1 Sam. a. 5. M m 274 OF PROPHECY. And thus we must understand the meaning of that question, " Who is their father?" ver. 12. which gave occasion to that proverbial speech af terwards commonly used amongst the Jews, " Is Saul also amongst the prophets ?" used of one that was suddenly raised up to some dignity or perfec tion which by his education he was not fitted for. And therefore the Chaldee paraphrast minding the scope of the place renders DiTlNt ia " Who is their father?" by lirqn ]a ' Who is their master?' which Kimchi approves, and accordingly expounds tha't proverb in this manner, rftyan nViy "7SU? DTN nimiO DiNiin VlNtf nar[ nail* inn ' When any one was raised from a low state to any dignity, they used to say, ' Is Saul also among the prophets ?" But R. Solomon would rather keep the Hteral sense of those words, " Who is their father ?" and therefore sup poseth something more than we here contend for, viz. That prophecy was a kind of hereditary thing. For so he speaks, ' Do not wonder for that he is called the father of them, sn rwi-v nana 'a that is, for prophecy is a hereditary thing.' But I think we may content ourselves with what our former authors have told us, to which we may add the tes timony of R. Levi B. Gersom, who tells us that these prophets here spoken of were the scholars of Samuel who trained them up to a degree of pro phetical perfection, and so is called their father, ronton bx as'3ni Steins ante nato <¦ because Samuel in structed them, and trained them up by his disci pline to a degree of prophetical perfection.* Of these disciples we find very frequent mention in Scripture ; so 2 Kings iv. we read ofthe sons or disciples of the prophets in Gilgal. And chap. vi. OF PROPHECY. 275 EHsha is there brought in as their master, at whose command they were, and therefore they ask leave to enlarge their dwellings. And Elisha himself was trained up by Elijah, as his disciple ; and there fore in 2 Kings in. it was thought a reason good enough to prove that he was a prophet, for that he had been Elijah's disciple, and " poured water up on his hands," as all the Jewish scholiasts observe. And Elisha sends one of these his ministering dis ciples to anoint Jehu to be king of Israel.* And the young prophet sent to reprove Ahab for spar ing Ben-hadad king of Syriat is caUed by the Chal dee paraphrast Niiiq inp^n 13.3a in frOS?. ' One of the sons, the disciples of the prophets.' And hence it was that Amos Urgeth the extraordinariness of his commission from God, " I was no prophet, nor was I a prophet's son."t mteaa mtenj1? iai» nn sb wiTabn 'He was not prepared for prophecy, or trained up so as to be fitted for a prophetical func tion by his discipleship,' as Abarbanel glosseth up on the place. And therefore divine inspiration found him out of the ordinary road of prophets, among his herds of cattle, and in an extraordinary way moved him to go to Bethel, there to declare God's judgments against king and people, even in the king's chapel. To conclude : In the New Tes tament, when John the Baptist and our Saviour called disciples to attend upon them and to learn divine oracles from them, it seems to have been no new thing, but that which was the common custom of the old prophets. Now of these prophets there were several schools * 2 Kingsix. 1. f 1 Kings xx. 3.5. J Amos vii. H. 276 OF PROPHECY. or colleges, as the Jews observe, in several cities, according as occasion was to employ them. So we read of a college in Jerusalem,* where Hul- dah the prophetess lived, which is called rratfP in the original, and by the Chaldee paraphrast translated t-us^ite n'a domus doctrina? ; by Kimchi itrnn n'a ' a school.' So we meet with divers places set down as those where the residence of those young prophets was, as Bethel, and Jericho, and Gilgal, &c.t So Kimchi observes upon the place 'iai nnnte nj?a vn is nn'3i Snaa a'toan ya vrw nai « As the sons of the prophets were in Bethel and Jeri cho,- so were there also of them in several other places. And the main reason why they were thus dispersed in many of the cities of Israel was this, that they might reprove the Israelites that were there : and their prophecy was wholly according to the exigency of those times ; and therefore it was that their prophecy was not com mitted to Writing.' From hence some of the Jewish writers tell us of a certain Aahouyja of prophecy, one continually like an evening star shining upon the conspicable hemisphere, when another was set. Kimchi tells us of this mystical gloss upon those words* " Ere the lamp of God went out,"t mm\ p-i?i nntei nate mteojn -u H>y '3 -mt* itma mrotsr nma in« "ps Sw w»«r na"pn jppip* sto -ip awn !*»i nnte in* Sip <¦ This is spoken mystically concerning the Hght of prophecy, according to that saying amongst our doctors, the sun riseth and the sun setteth, that is, ere God makes the sun of one righteous man to set, he makes the sun of another righteous man to rise.' * 2 Kings xxii. 14. \ 2 Kings ii. and iv. \ 1 Sam. iii. S. OF PROPHECY. 277 CHAP. X. Of Bath Kol, i, e. filia vocis : That it succeeded in the room qf prophecy : That it was by the Jews counted the lowest degree qf revelatum. What places in the New Testament are to be under stood of it. W E should come now briefly to speak of the highest degree of divine inspiration or prophecy, taken in a general sense, which was the Mosaical. But before we do that, it may not be amiss to take notice of the lowest degree of revelation among the Jews, which was inferior to all that which they call by the name of prophecy : and this was their Vip n3 Bath Kol, filia vocis, which was nothing else but some voice which was heard as descending from heaven, directing them in any affair as occa sion served : which kind of revelation might be made to one, as Maimonides tells us,* that was no way prepared for prophecy. Of this filia vocis, we have mention made in one of the most ancient monuments of Jewish learn ing,! and otherwhere very frequently among the Jewish writers, as that which was a frequent thing after the ceasing of prophecy among the Jews ; of which more afterward. Josephus t tells a story of Hircanus the high priest, how he heard this voice from heaven, which told him of the victory which his sons had got at Cyzicum against An- * More Nev. Part II. cap. 42. f pirke R- Eliezer> caP- 44- j: Archaeol. Lib. XIII. cap. 18. 278 OF PROPHECY. tiochus the same day the battle was fought ; and this (he says) while he was offering up incense in the temple, riva rgoirov auru rb Ssiov sig kbyoug ^X^g, he was made partaker of a vocal converse with God, that is by a Sip ma. This R. Isaac Angarensis L. Cosri strongly urgeth against the Karra?i or Scripturarii, (a sort of Jews that reject all Talmudical traditions) that the grand doctors of the Jews received such traditions from the seventy-two senators, who were guided either by a Sip ma or something answerable to it, in the truth of things, after all prophecy was ceased,* Sa miaann Sa .mm1? a'nxa m v-nn:on '3 nap Sip maa iaipaa naijw ma itc pwdj ana npbrttu s^to oier mi rSw i. e. ' There is a tradition that the men of the great Sanhedrim were bound to be skiUed in the knowledge of all sciences, and therefore it is much more necessary that prophecy should not be taken from them, or that which should supply its room, viz. the daughter of voice, and the like.' Thus he, according to the genius of Talmudical learning, is pleased to expound the place, where it is said, that " a law shall go forth out of Zion,"t of the consistorial decrees of the judges, rulers, and priests of the Jews, and the great senate of seventy-two elders, whom he would needs persuade us to be guided infallibly by this Sip n: or in some other way nSs nun by some divine virtue, power, or assistance, always communicated to them, as sup posed at least that such a heroical spirit as that spirit of fortitude which belonged to the judges and kings of Israel, and is called the Spirit of' God, * Maam. iii. §. 41. f Isa. ii. 5. OF PROPHECY. 279 (as Maimonides in More Nevoch tells us) had per petually cleaved to them. But we shall here leave our author to his Judai- cal superstition, and take notice of two or three places in the New Testament which seem to be understood perfectly of this filia vocis, which the constant tradition of the Jews assures us to have succeded in the room of prophecy. The first is where this heavenly voice was conveyed to our Saviour, as if it had been the noise of thunder, but was not well understood by all those that stood by, who therefore thought that either it thundered, or that it was a mighty voice of some angel that spake to him : " Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified my name, and will glorify it again. The people, therefore, that stood by and heard it, said it thundered : others said that an angel spake to him."* So after our Saviour's baptism, upon his coming out of the water, the Evangelist tells us, that " the heavens were opened, and that the Spirit of God descended upon him in the shape of a dove, and lo, a voice from hea ven, saying, This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased."t And last of all we meet with this kind of voice upon our Saviour's transfigura tion, which is there so described as coming out of a cloud, as if it had been loud like the noise of thunder, " Behold a bright cloud overshadowed them, and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased :"t which voice, it is said, the three disciples , that were then with him in the mount, heard, as * John xii. 28, 29. f Malt. iii. 17. | Matt. xvii. 5, 6. 280 OF PROPHECY. we are told in the following verse, and also 2 Pet. i. 17, 18. From whence we are fully informed, that it was this filia vocis we speak of, which came for the apostles' sakes that were with him, as a testi mony of that glory and honour with which God magnified his son ; which apostles were not yet raised up to the degree of prophecy, but only made partakers of a voice inferior to it. The words are these, " He received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased. And this voice which came from heaven, we heard when we were with him in the holy mount." Now that this was that very Sip na we speak of, which was inferior to pro phecy, we may sufficiently learn from the next verse, " We have also a more sure word of pror phecy:" for indeed true prophecy was counted much more authentical than this Sip na as being a divine inspiration into the mind of the prophet ; which this was not, but only a voice that moved their exterior senses ; and by the mediation there of, informed their minds. And thus we have done with this argument. OF PROPHECY. i 281 CHAP. XL Of the highest degree of divine inspiration, viz. the Mosaical. Four differences between the divine revelations made to Moses, and to tke rest qf the prophets. How the doctrine qf men pro phetically inspired is to approve itself by miracles, or by its rea sonableness. The sympathy and agreeableness between a holy wind and divine truth. V V E now come briefly to inquire into the highest degree of divine inspiration, which was the Mosai cal, that by which the law was given ; and this we may best do by searching out the characteristical differences of Moses' inspiration from that which was technically caUed prophecy. And these we shall take out of Maimonides,* where they are fully described according to the general strain of aU the Rabbinical doctrine delivered upon this argu ment. The first is, That Moses was made partaker of these divine revelations per vigiliam, whereas God manifested himself to aU the other prophets in a dream or vision, when their senses were dgyoi, ma D'K'3:nSaiff awajn Sa -ikip mttiaj1? r-vtra ntoaa ya w ttnsn naijji -ij> Kim ntn wai nirai nsnaa ik anna ' What is the difference between the prophecy of Moses and the prophecy of all other prophets ? All other prophets did prophesy in a dream or vision : but Moses our master when he was awake and standing, according to what is written.' " And when Moses was gone into the tabernacle of the congregation to speak * De Fund. Legis, cap. 7. Nn 282 OF PROPHECY. with him, i. e. God, then he heard the voice of one speaking unto him."* By which it appears he had free recourse to this heavenly oracle at any time. And tlierefore the Talmudists have a rule, vai niea tnSns nt033 aSiya vSk ntta njS n"j? 'That Moses had never any prophecy in the night-time, i. e. in a dream or vision of the night, as the other pro phets had.' The second difference is, That. Moses prophesied without the mediation of any angelical power, by an influence derived immediately from God; whereas in all other prophecies, as we have showed heretofore, some angel still appeared to the prophet, 131 i«S» n' Si? a'K'3jn S3 « AU prophets did prophesy by the help or ministry of an angel, and therefore they did see that which they saw in parables, or un der some dark representation ; but Moses prophe sied without the ministry of an angel.' This he proves from Numb. xu. 8, where God says of Mo ses, " I will speak with him mouth to mouth ;" and Exod. xxxiii. 11. " The Lord spake unto Moses face to face." But we must not in this place adhere to that ex position which Maimonides and the rest of his countrymen give us of this place, as to forget what we are told in the New Testament concerning the ministry of angels which God used in giving the law itself: and so St. Stephen discourseth of it;t and St. Paul tells us, " the law was given by the disposition of angels in the hands of a mediator,"* that is, Moses, the mediator then between God and the people. And therefore I should rather think * Numb. vii. 89. f Acts vii. 55. \ Gal. iii. 19. 5 OF PROPHECY. 283 the meaning of those words " face to face," to im port the clearness and evidence of the intellectual light wherein God appeared to Moses, which was greater than any of the prophets were made parta kers of. And therefore the old tradition goes of them, that they saw nn'«a njw KnSpsoa in speculo non lucido whereas Moses saw in speculo lucido ou hi ahiypdruv, as Philo teUs us (together with Maimonides) in his book, Quis Rerum Divin. Haeres sit, that is, without any impressions or images of things in his imagination in a hieroglyphical way, as was wont to be in all dreams and visions ; but by characterizing all immediately upon his understanding : though otherwise much of the law was indeed almost little more, for the main scope and aim of it, but an emblem or allegory. But there may be yet a farther meaning of those words " face to face," and that is, the friendly and amicable way whereby aU divine revelations were made to Moses; for so it is added in the text, " As a man speaketh unto his friend.'" And this is the third difference which Maimo nides assigns, viz. a'JJinnai onnsji ckt D'«'3Jn Sa ' All the other prophets were afraid and trou bled, and fainted ; but Moses was not so : for the Scripture saith, " God spake to him as a man speaks to his friend ;" that is to say, as a man is not afraid to hear the words of his friend, so was Moses able to understand the words of prophecy without any disturbance and astonishment of mind.' The fourth and last difference is the liberty of Moses' spirit to prophesy at all times, as we heard before out of Numb. vii. 89- He might have re course at any time to the sacred oracle, in the ta bernacle, which spake from between the cherubim : 284 OF PROPHECY. and so Maimonides lays down this difference, Sa wvw mj? Sas o'K'32nn y» o'tt'SJh « None of the prophets did prophesy at what time they would, save Moses, who was clothed with the Holy Spirit when he would, and the spirit of prophecy did abide upon him : neither had he need to predispose his mind or prepare himself for it, for he was always disposed and in readiness as a ministering angel ; and there fore he could prophesy at what time he would, ac cording to that which is spoken in Numb. ix. 8. " Tarry you here a Httle, and I will hear what the Lord will command concerning you.'" Thus Mai monides, who, I thmk, here somewhat hyperboliz- eth, and scarce speaks consistently with the rest of the Hebrew masters. For we may remember what we heard before concerning the Talmudical tradition, that Moses' mind was indisposed for pro phecy when he was transported with indignation against the spies ; though I think it is most proba ble that he had a greater liberty of prophesying than any other of the prophets. Now this clear distinct kind of inspiration made immediately upon an inteUectual faculty in a fa miliar way, which we see was the gradus Mosaicus, was most fit and proper for laws to be administered in : which was exceUently took notice of by Plu tarch in that discourse of his,* where he teUs us the poetry that was usually interlaced with riddles and parables was taken away in his time, and a more famfliar way of prophecy brought in ; though he by a GentUe superstition applies that to his Py- thia ; @soj apskuv ruv yjgna^uv eirn xai ykuaaag xai irsgt- * nt(i tiiu /th xwrlpfwrc »»» *w IIi/SvW OF PROPHECY. 285 pgdaeig xai dadpsiav, ouru htakeyeaSai iragaaxeuaae rolg yjgupsvotg, &c. ' God hath now taken away from his oracles poetry, and the variety of dialect, and cir cumlocution, and obscurity ; and hath so ordered them to speak to those that consult them, as the laws do to the cities under their subjection, and kings to their people, and masters to their scholars, in the most inteUigible and persuasive language. But by Plutarch's leave this character agrees neither to his Pythia, nor indeed to Moses himself, who put a veil upon his face in giving the law itself to the people, but to our Saviour alone, the dispenser ofthe true law of God inwardly to the souls of men ; and therein conversing with them, not so much irgoauiru irgbg itgbauirov as vy irgbg vouv, not so much ' face to face' as * mind to mind.' We have now seen what is this gradus propheti- cus Mosaicus, which indeed was necessary should be transcendent and extraordinary, because it was the basis of aU future prophecy among the Jews: for aU the prophets mainly aim at that to establish and confirm the law of Moses, as to the practical observation of it ; and therefore it was also so strongly manifested to the Israelites by signs and miracles done in the sight of all the people, and his famUiarity and acquaintance with heaven testified to them all, the divine voice being heard by them all at mount Sinai ; which dispensation amounted at least to as much as a Sip ms to the very lowest of the people. All which considerations put R. Phineas into such an admiration of this 'Ja nn naj?a or statio montis Sinai, (as the doctors are wont to call it) that he determines in Pirke Eliezer, ' That aU this generation that heard the voice of the holy 286 OF PROPHECY. blessed God, was worthy to be accounted as the ministering angels.' But what that voice was which they heard, the later Jews are scarce well agreed: but MaimonideSj according to the most received opinion,* teUs that they only heard those first words of the law distinctly, viz. " I am the Lord thy God," and, " Thou shalt have none other gods," &c. and but only the sound of aU the rest of the words in which the remainder of the law was given : and this, as he says, was the great mystery of that station, so much spoken of by the ancients. And here by the way we may take notice, that that divine inspiration which is conveyed to any oneman, primarily benefits none but himself; and therefore many times, as Maimonides tells us, it rested in this private use, not profiting any else but those to whom it came. And the reason of this is manifest, for that an inspiration abstractly consi dered can only satisfy the mind of him to whom it is made, of its own authority and authenticalness, as we have showed before : and therefore that one man may know that another hath that doctrine re vealed to him by a prophetical spirit which he de livers, he must also either be inspired, and so be in gradu prophetico in a true sense, or be confirm ed in the belief of it by some miracle, whereby it may appear that God hath committed his truth to such a one, by giving him some signal power in altering the course of nature ; which indeed was the way by which the prophets of old ordinarily confirmed their doctrine, when they delivered any thing new to the people ; which course our Saviour * More Nev. Part II. cap. 53. OF PROPHECY. 287 himself and his disciples also took to confirm the truth of the gospel : or else there must be so much reasonableness in the thing itself, as that by moral arguments it may be sufficient to beget a belief in the minds of sober and good men. And I wish this last way of becoming acquainted with divine truth were better known amongst us : for when we have once attained to aJBia^aacjti^e^ fianafiJjfjaailld* we have then attained to the end of aU prophecy, and see all divine truth that tends to the salvation of our souls in the divine light, which always shines in the purity and holiness of the new j creature, and so need no further miracle to confirm 1 us in it. And indeed that godlike glory and ma jesty which appear in the naked simplicity of true goodness, will, by its own connateness and sympa thy with aU saving truth, friendly entertain and em brace it. CHAP. XII. When the prophetical spirit ceased in the Jewish church. The cessation of prophecy noted as a famous epocha by the Jews. The restoring qf the prophetical spirit by Christ. Some passa ges to this purpose in the New Testament explained. When the prophetical spirit ceased in the Christian church. That it did not continue long, proved by several testimonies of the ancient Writers. JL HUS we have donewith all those sorts of pro phecy which we find any mention of: and as a co- ronis to this discourse, we shall farther inquire a lit- 288 OF PROPHECY, tie what period of time it was in which this propheti cal spirit ceased both in the Jewish and Christian church. In which business, because the Scripture itself is in a manner sUent, we must appeal to such histories as are Hke to be most authentical in this business. And first for the period of time when it ceased in the Jewish, I find our Christian writers differ ing. Justin Martyr would needs persuade us that it was not tUl the a?ra Christiana. This he incul cates often in his Dialogue with Trypho the Jew, Ouhsirore iv ru y'evei uj/juv eirauaaro ours irgopnrng ours dgyjuv, eg orou agyjiv ekafie, peygig ou ourog 'Inaoug Xg«r- rbg xai y'syovs xai sirakv, ' There never ceased in your nation either prophet or prince, till Jesus Christ was born, and had suffered.' And so he often there tells us that John the Baptist was the last prophet of the Jewish church ; which conceit he seems to have made so much of, as thinking to bring in our Saviour lumine prophetica, with the greater evidence of divine authority, as the pro mised Messiah into the world. But Clemens Alex- andrinus hath much more truly, with the consent of all Jewish antiquity, informed us, that all prophecy determined in Malachi, in his Strom. Lib. I. where he numbers up the prophets of the Jews, making them thirtyjfive in all, and Malachi as the last. Though indeed the Talmudists reckon up fifty-five prophets and prophetesses together, Gem. Mass. MegU. w miK'33 yaun a'K'aj r-oasn ajnnK yar\ « The Rabbins say that there were forty-eight prophets and seven prophetesses that did prophesy to the Israelites :' which, after they had reckoned almost up, they teU us that Malachi was the last of them, and that OF PROPHECY. 289 he was contemporary with Mordecai, Daniel, Hag gai, Zachariah, and some others, whose prophecies are not extant, whom for their number sake they there reckon up, who all prophesied in the second year of Darius. But commonly they make only these three, Haggai, Zachariah and Malachi, to be the last of the prophets, and so call them awaa awn« so Massec. Sotah, last chapter, where the Misnical doctors tell us, that from the time in which aU the first prophets expired, the Urim and Thummim ceased ; and the Gemarists say that they are called a'jiipsn asn: « the first prophets,' 'pissS inrj B'jnnKn 'a«Sai mnnt 'ina < in opposition to Haggai, Zachariah and Malachi, which are the last.' And so Maimon. and Bartenor. tell us that the prophe- ta? priores were so called, because they prophesied in the times pin n'a of the first temple, and the posteriores, because they prophesied in the time of the second temple : and when these latter prophets died, then aU prophecy expired, and there was left, as they say, only a Bath Kol to succeed some time in the room of it. So we are told* »an un ampn nn npSnoj '3tj •^uyjj ironi irgbg rb [Askkov. b ydg ivOouaiuapubg rotourbv ian, ' For neither the voice, nor sound, nor phrase, nor metre is from God, but from Pythia herself; God only suppeditates the phantasms, and kindles a light in the soul to signify future things : for all enthusiasm is after this manner.' Hence was that old saying of Heraclitus, 'O "Aval, ou fb puavrstovian rb iv Ask'po7g, ours k'eysi, ours xguirret, akkd cnpaivei, ' That the king, whose oraCle is at Delphi, neither plainly expresses, nor conceals, but only obscurely intimates by signs.' But to conclude thisj^rsif par ticular, I shall add by way of caution, We must not think that we can vary Scripture expression so securely with retaining the true meaning, except we likewise had as real an understanding of the sense itself as the prophets had, over whom God also did so far superintend in their copying forth his truth, as not to suffer them to swerve from his meaning. And so we have done with that parti cular. 2. In the next place, for the better understand ing all prophetical writ, we must observe, That there is sometimes a seeming inconsistence in things spo ken of, if we shall come to examine them by 'the strict logical rules of method : we must not there fore, in the matter of any prophetical vision, look for a constant methodical contexture of things car ried on in a perpetual coherence. The prophetical - spirit doth not tie itself to these rules of art, or thus knit up its dictates systematicaUy, fitly framing one piece or member into a combination with the > rest, as it were with the joints and sinews of nie- OF PROPHECY. 299 thod : for this indeed would rather argue a human i and artificial contrivance than any inspiration, which, as it must beget a transportation in the mind, so it must spend itself in such abrupt kind of revelations as may argue indeed the prophet to have been inspired. And therefore Tully * judiciously excepts against the authenticalness of those verses of the Sibyls which he met with in his time, (and which were the same perhaps with those we now have) because of those acrostics and some other things which argue an elaborate artifice, and an af fected dUigence of the writer, and so indeed non furentis erant, sed adhibentis diUgentiam, as he speaks. Lumen propheticum est lumen abruptum, as was weU noted anciently by the Jews. And therefore the masters of Jewish tradition have laid down this maxim, r-ninn -in'sai anpia y* ' Non est prius et pos- terius in lege,' We must not seek for any methodi cal concatenation of things in the law, or indeed in any other part of prophetical writ ; it being a most usual thing with them many times ir'sgug dgyfi auvdir- rsiv to knit the beginning and end of time together. Nescit tarda molimina Spiritus Sancti gratia, is true also of the grace or gift of prophecy. We find no curious transitions, nor true dependence many times of one thing upon another ; but things of very dif ferent natures, and that were cast into periods of time secluded one from another by vast intervals, aU couched together in the same vision ; as Jerome hath observed in many places, and therefore tells us, Non cura? fuit spiritui prophet ali historia? ordi- nem sequi. And. thus he takes notice in Dan. xi. 2. * Lib. II. De Diyinat 300 OF PROPHECY. that whereas there were thirteen kings between Cy rus and Alexander the Great, the prophet speaks of but four, skipping over the rest, as if the other nine had filled up no part of the interval. The like he observes upon Jer. xxi. 1. and elsewhere ; as likewise sudden and abrupt introductions of per sons, mutations of persons, (exits and intrats upon this prophetical stage being made, as it were, in an invisible manner) and transitions from the voice of one person to another. The prophetical spirit, though it make no noise and tumult in its motions, yet it is most quick, spanning as it were from the centre to the circumference ; it moves most swift ly, though most gently. And thus Philo's obser vation is true, Ouhsig ivvoug puvreuei. There must be some kind of Mavia in all prophecy, as Philo* tells us, "Ore pug iirikd^st rb Sstov, huerat rb uvSguirtvov, ' When divine light ariseth upon the horizon of the soul of man, his own human light sets :' it must at least hide itself as a lesser light, as it were by an occasus heliacus, under the beams of the greater, and be wholly subject to the irradiations and influ ences of it. Aid rouro r) huaig rou koytapou xui rb iregi aurbv axbrog exaraatv xai ^eopbgnrov puviuv iyevvnae, as he goes on, ' Therefore the setting of a man's own discursive faculty and the ecHpsing thereof be gets an ecstasis and a divine kind of mania.' 3. The last rule we shall observe is, That no - piece J^J^^ht^is to ^e understood ofthe state of the world to come, or the mundus animarum: for mdeeHjt is altogetherMmpossible™ to describe that, or to comprehend it in this lifel "And : therefore" * In his " Quis rerum divinarum hseres sit." OF PROPHECY. 301 aUjdiyine revelation in scripture must concern some state in this world. And 16" we must understand air those places that treat of " a new heaven and a new earth," and such like. And so we must un derstand the new Jerusalem mentioned in the New Testament, in that prophetical book of the Apoca lypse, Rev. xxi. And thus the Jews were wont universally to understand them, according to that maxim we now speak of ascribed to R. Jochanan,* N3n aSij? u?3t? n'l^an nian sStt itajnj xS aSu a'«'3:n Ss 5 ntn njS ys ' All the prophets prophesied to the days of the Messiah ; but as for the world to come, eye hath not seen it.' So they constantly expound that passage in Isa. lxiv. 4. " Since the beginning of the world men have not heard, nor perceived by the ear, neither hath the eye seen, O God, besides thee, what he hath prepared for him that waiteth for him." And according to this aphorism our Saviour seems to speak, when he says, " All prophets and the law prophesied untU John,"t eug 'ludwou, i. e. They prophesied to or for that dispen sation which was to begin with John, who lived in the time of the twilight, as it were, between the law and the gospel. They prophesied of those things which should be accomplished within the period of gospel dispensation which was ushered in by John. As for the state of blessedness in heaven, it is"1 major mente humana, much more is it major phan- tasid. But of this in part heretofore. » Massec. Berac. cap. 5. t Matt- xi' 13' 302 AN ADVERTISEMENT. AN ADVERTISEMENT. JL HE reader may remember that our author, in the beginning of his Treatise of the Immortality of the Soul, propounded these three great principles of religion to be discoursed of; 1. The Immortality ofthe Soul; 2. The Existence and Nature of God ; 3. The Communication of God to mankind through Christ. And having spoken largely to the two former principles of natural theology, he thought it fit (as a preparation to the third, which imports the revelation of the gospel) to speak something concerning prophecy, the way whereby revealed truth is dispensed to us. Of this he intended to treat but a little (they are his words in the begin ning of the treatise of prophecy), and then pass on to the third and last part, viz. those principles of revealed truth which tend most of all to advance and cherish true and real piety. But in his dis coursing of prophecy, so many considerable inqui ries offered themselves to his'thoughts, that by that time he had finished this discourse (designed at first only as a Preface) his office of being Dean and Catechist in the college did expire. Thus far had the author proceeded in that year of his office : and it was not long after that bodily distempers and AN ADVERTISEMENT. 303 weaknesses began more violently to seize upon him, which the summer following put a period to his Hfe here; a life so every way beneficial to those who had the happiness to converse with him. Sic multis ille bonis flebilis occidit. Thus he who designed to speak of God's communication of him self to mankind through Christ, was taken up by God into a more inward and immediate participa tion of himself in blessedness. Had he Hved, and had health to have finished the remaining part of his designed method, the reader may easily con ceive what a valuable piece that discourse would have been. Yet that he may not altogether want the author's labours upon such an argument, I thought good in the next place to adjoin a dis course of the like importance and nature, delivered heretofore by the author in some chapel exercises, from which I shall not detain the reader by any more of Preface. A DISCOURSE TREATING OF LEGAL RIGHTEOUSNESS; EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS, OR THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF FAITH: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE LAW AND THE GOSPEL; THE OLD AND NEW COVENANT: JUSTIFICATION AND DIVINE ACCEPTANCE ; THE CONVEYANCE OF THE EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS TO US BY FAITH. Except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the Scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven. Matt. v. 20. Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof. 2 Tim. iii. 5. For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did. I j j Heb. vii. 19. "Otf'oi uto't ziiri tou Quros xai rns tiaxavias tvs xaivvis o*ia.$nxvi$ Iv reo imvp.an ry uyioi, ' SioStfiuxroi t'lfiv uutvi ya.^ v\ xty5 itrtyfiuQu iv tu7s xufliuis auruv tous vopoovs tou trviuftaros* oux oQiikauirlv ouv us tus ypatyus fiovov ras oia (azXuvos ys- y^ufifiivas vXtigoipoguirS-ui, aXXa xui us tus srXuxus ttis xu/jSius « x^15 T0" ®zou lyyga.Qei tous vofitous tou vrnvpuTOS xui tu Wou^mtu puerripiu. B. Macarius in Homil. 15. Qq A DISCOURSE OF LEGAL RIGHTEOUSNESS; AND OF THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF FAITH, &c. But Israel, -which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness : Wherefore t Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. Rom. ix. 31, 32. CHAP. I. The introduction, showing what it is to have a right knowledge of divine truth, and what it is that is either available or prejudicial to the true Christian knowledge and life. JL HE doctrine of Christian reHgion propounded to us by our Saviour and his apostles, is set forth with so much simplicity, and yet with so much re pugnancy to that degenerate genius and spirit that rules in the hearts and lives of men, that we may truly say of it, it is both the easiest and the hardest 1 thing : it is a revelation wrapt up in a complication of mysteries, Hke that book of the Apocalypse, which both unfolds and hides those great arcana that it treats of; or, as Plato sometimes chose so to 308 OF LEGAL AND explain the secrets of his metaphysical or theologi cal philosophy, aare 6 avayvoug fin yvm, that he that read might not be able to understand, except he were a son of wisdom, and had been trained up in the knowledge of it. The principles of true reHgion are all in themselves plain and easy, delivered in the most famUiar way, so that he that runs may read them ; they are aU so clear and perspicuous, that they need no key of analytical demonstration to unlock them : the Scripture being written doctis pariter et indoclis, and yet it is " wisdom in a mys tery which the princes of this world understand not ;"* a sealed book which the greatest Sophies may be most unacquainted with : it is like that pillar of fire and of a cloud that parted between the Israelites and the Egyptians, giving a clear and comfortable light to all those that are under the manuduction and guidance thereof, but being full of darkness and obscurity to those that rebel against it. Divine truth^ is not to be discerned so much in a jnan's^br^in, jas. JnTiisT Tieart. Divine wisdom is a tree of Hfe to them that find her, and it is only Hfe that can feelingly converse witi> life. ATI the thin speculations and subtilest discourses of philosophy cannot so Well unfold or define -any sensible object, nor teU any one so well what it is, as his own naked sense wiU do. There is a divine and spiritual sense which only is able to converse ihlerhalfy wMTBeiife and soul of divine truth, as mixing and uniting itself with it; whUe vulgar minds behold only the body and outside of it. Though in itself it be most intelligible, and such * 1 Cor. ii. 7, 8. EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 309 that man's mind may most easUy apprehend ; yet there is a nsnitan ns'Sp (as the Hebrew writers call that mn -tt') incrustamentum immunditiei upon all corrupt minds, which hinders the lively taste and relish of it. This is that thick and palpable dark ness which cannot comprehend that divine light that shines in the minds and understandings of aU men, but makes them to deny that very truth which they seem to entertain. " The world through wisdom (as the apostle speaks) knew not God."* Those great disputers of this world were too full of nice and empty speculations to know him who is only to be discerned by a pacate, hum ble, and self-denying mind : their curiosity served rather to dazzle their eyes than to enlighten them ; while they rather proudly braved themselves in their knowledge of the Deity, than humbly sub jected their own souls to a compliance with it ; making the Divinity nothing else but, as it were, a flattering glass that might the better reflect and set off to them the beauty of their own wit and parts: and while they seemed to converse with God himself, they rather amorously courted their own image in him, and fell into love with their own shape. Therefore the best acquaintance with religion is Seoht'haxrog yvSaig, ' a knowledge taught by God :' it is a light that descends from hea ven, which is only able to guide and conduct the souls of men to heaven, from whence it comes. The Jewish doctors used to put it among the fundamental articles of their religion, * That their law was from heaven,' own ya rnwn : I am sure * 1 Cor. i. 21. 310 OF LEGAL AND we may much rather reckon it amongst the prin ciples of our Christian religion in a higher way, that it is an influx from God upon the minds of good men. And this is the great design and plot of the gospel, to open and unfold to us the true way of recourse to God ; a contrivance for the uniting the souls of men to him, and the deriving a participation of God to men, to bring in " ever lasting righteousness," and to establish the true tabernacle of God in the spirits of men, which was done in a typical and emblematical way under the law. And herein consists the main pre-emi nence which the gospel hath above the law, in that it so clearly unfolds the way and method of umting human jaature Jto ^Divinity^ which the apostle seems mainly to aim at in these words, " But Israel which foUowed after the law of righte ousness, &c." EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 311 CHAP. II. An inquiry into that Jewish notion of a legal righteousness, which is opposed by St. Paul. That their notion of it was such as this, viz. That the law externally dispensed to them, though it were, as a dead letter, merely without them, and conjoined with the power qf their own free-will, was sufficient to procure them acceptance with God, and to acquire merit enough to purchase eternal life, perfection and happiness. That this their notion had these two grounds ; First, An opinion of their own self- sufficiency, and that their free-wiU was so absolute and perfect, as that they needed not that God should do any thing for them but only furnish them with some law to exercise this innate power about. That they asserted such freedom qf will as might be to them a foundation qf merit. -T OR the unfolding whereof, we shaU endeavour to search out, Jirst, What the Jewish notion of a legal righteousness was, which the apostle here condemns. Secondly, What that evangelical righteousness, or righteousness of faith, is, which he endeavours to establish in the room of it. For the first, That which the apostle here blames the Jews for, seems to be indeed nothing else but an epitome or compendium of aU that which he otherwhere disputes against them for : which is not merely and barely concerning the formal notion of justification, as some may think, viz. whether the formal notion of it respects only faith, or works in the person justified, (though there may be a respect to that also) it is not merely a subtile school controversy which he seems to handle ; but it is of a greater latitude ; it is indeed concerning 312 OF LEGAL AND the whole way of life and happiness, and the pro per scope of restoring mankind to perfection and union with the Deity, which the Jews expected by virtue of that system 'and pandect of laws which were delivered upon mount Sinai, augmented and enlarged by the Gemara of their own tradi tions. That we may the better understand which, per haps it may not be amiss a little to traverse the writings of their most approved ancient authors, that so finding out their constant received opinions concerning their law and the works thereof, we may the better and more fully understand what St. Paul and the other apostles aim at in their disputes against them. The Jewish notion generally of the law is this ; ' That in that model of life contained in that body of laws, distinguished ordinarUy into moral, judicial, and ceremonial, was comprised the whole method of raising man to his perfection ; and that they having only this book of laws without them, to converse with, needed nothing else to procure eternal life, perfection and happiness : as if this had been the only means God had for the saving of men, and making them happy, to set before them in an external way, a volume of laws, statutes, and ordinances, and so to leave them to work out and purchase to themselves eternal Hfe in the observ ance of them.' Now this general notion of theirs we shall unfold in two particulars. First, as a foundation of all the rest, they took up this as a hypothesis, or common principle, * That mankind had such an absolute and perfect free- EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 313 will, and such a sufficient power from within him self to virtue and goodness, as that he only need ed some law as the matter or object to exercise this innate power about ; and therefore needed not that God should do any thing more for him, than merely to acquaint him with his divine will and pleasure. And for this we have Maimonides speaking very fully and magisterially, that this was one of their radices fidei, or articles of their faith, and one main ^ foundation upon which the law stood. His words are these,* Tn1? iosjj men1? m-\ ax rairo ens bah nutn '•01 r-oiis ' The power of free-will is given to every man to determine himself, if he wiU, to that which is good, and to be good ; or to determine himself to that which is evil, and to be wicked, if he wiU. Both are in his power, according to what is written in the law, " Behold, man is become as one of us, to know good and evil :"t that is to say, Behold this sort of creature, man, is alone (and there is not a second like to man) in this, viz. That man from himself, by his own proper knowledge and power, knows good and evU, and does what pleaseth him in an uncontroUable way, so as none can hinder him as to the doing of either good or evU.' And a little after he thus interprets those words in the Lamentations, of the repenting church, " Let us search and try our ways, and turn unto the Lord,"$ 'iai ut> uirmcn S'Kin « Seeing that we who are endued with the power of free-wiU, have most wittingly and freely committed all our trans- * Halacah Teshubah, or Treatise of Repentance, chap. 5. f **en. iii. 22. j Lam. iii. 40. Rr 314 OF LEGAL AND gressions ; it is meet and becoming that we should convert ourselves by repentance, and forsake all our iniquities, forasmuch as this also is in our pow er : this is the importance of those words, " Let us search and try our ways, and turn unto the Lord." And this is a great fundamental, the very pillar of the law and precept, according to what is written, " See, I have set before thee this day Hfe and death, good and evU.'"* Thus we see Maimonides, who was well versed in the most ancient Jewish learning, and in high es teem among aU the Jews, is pleased to reckon this as a main principle and foundation upon which that law stood ; as indeed it must needs be, if life and perfection might be acquired by virtue of those le gal precepts which had only an external administra tion, being set before their external senses, and pro- mulged to their ears as the statute-laws of any com monwealth used to be. Which was the very no tion that they themselves had of these laws. And therefore in Breshith Rabba (a very ancient writing) the Jewish doctors taking notice of that passage in the Canticles, " Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth,"t they thus gloss upon it ; 'At the time of the giving of the law, the congregation of Israel desired that Moses might speak to them, they be ing not able to hear the words of God himself: and while he spake, they heard, and hearing, fofgat ; and thereupon moved this debate among themselves, What is this Moses, a man of flesh and blood? arid what is his law, that we so soon learn, and so soon forget it ? O that God would kiss us with the kisses * Deut. xxx. IS. f Son^ i. EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 315 of his mouth !' that is, in their sense, that God would teach them in a more vital and internal way. And then (as they go on) Moses maketh this an swer, rvwpn 'E'j taV Tnj£> r-vrv *«?Sk nnj; .— ivnS So' tsW '«i ' That this "could not be then : but it should so come to pass in the time to come, in the days of the Messiah, when the law should be written in their hearts, as it is said, " 1 will write it in their hearts.'"* By this we may see how necessary it was for the Jews, that they might be consistent to their grand principle of obtaining life and perfection by this dead letter, and a thing merely without themselves, (as not being radicated in the vital powers of their own souls) to establish such a power of free-will as might be able uncontrollably to entertain it, and so readily by its own strength perform all the dictates of it. And that Maimonides was not the first of the Jewish writers who expound that passage, " Behold, man is become like one of us, to know good and evil,"t of free-will, may appear from the several Chaldee paraphrasts upon it, which seem very much to intimate that sense. Which, by the way, (though I cannot allow all that which the Jews deduce from it) I think is not without something of truth, viz. That that liberty which is founded in reason, and which mankind only in this lower world hath above other creatures, may be there also meant. But whatever it is, I am sure the Jewish commentators upon that place generally follow the rigid sense of Maimonides. * Jer. xxxi. 33. t Gen. iii. 22. 316 OF LEGAL AND To this purpose R. Bechai, a man of no small learning both in the Talmudic and Cabalistical doc trine of the Jews, tells us, that upon Adam's first transgression, that grand liberty of indifferency equally to good or evil began first to discover itself; whereas before that he was ^sv iSa < all intellect and whoUy spiritual,' (as that common Cabalistical no tion was) being from within only determined to that which was good. But I shall at large relate his words, because of their pertinency and usefulness in the matter now in hand, vityn Sj? n-oin r-m =nan 'iai utorw amp that is, ' Adam before his sin, acted from a necessity of nature, and all his actions were nothing else but the issues of pure and perfect un derstanding. Even as the angels of God, being no thing else but intelligences, put forth nothing else but acts of intelligence ; just so was man before he sinned, and did eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil : but after this transgression, he had the power of election and free-will, whereby he was able to wUl good or evil.' And a Httle after gloss ing on those words, "And the eyes of them both were opened"* he addeth, njnn ^inon-proi ym wtron '131 'They derived the power of free-will from the tree of knowledge of good and evU : and now they be came endued With "this power of determining them selves to good or evil ; and this property is divine, and in some respect a good property.' So that, ac cording to the mind of our author, the first original and pedigree of free-wiU is to be derived, not so much from the aera of' creation, as from that after- epocha of man's transgression, or eating of the fbr- * Gen. iii. 7. EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 317 bidden fruit : so that the indifferency of man's will to good or evil, and a power to determine himself freely to either, did then first of all unfold itself; whereas before he conversed Hke a pure intelligence with its first cause, without any propension at all to material things, being determined like a proper natural agent solely to that which is good : and these propensions arising upon the first transgres sion to material things (which they supposed to be in men's power either so to correct and castigate as to prevent any sin in them, or else to pursue in a way of vice) are, if not the form and essence, yet at least the original and root of that tf"in -w< which they speak so much of. But of this in another place. AU this we have further confirmed out of Nach manides, an author sufficiently versed in aU matters concerning the Jewish religion. His words are these,* "ai ntnan |»:n 'From the time of the creation, man had a power of free-will within him to do good or evil, according to his own choice, as also through the whole time of the law ; that so he might be ca pable of merit in freely choosing what is good, and of punishment in electing what is evU.' Wherein that he teUs us that this free-wiU hath continued ever since the creation, we must not understand ri gidly the very moment of man's creation, but that epocha taken with some latitude, so that it may in clude the time of man's first transgression : for he after suggests thus much, That, before the first sin, Adam's power to good was a mere natural power without .any such indifferency to evil ; and there- * Comment upon Deut. xxx. 13. 3J8 OF LEGAL AND fore he makes that state of Adam the model and platform of future perfection, which the most an cient Jewish authors seem to expect in the time of their Messiah, which he expresseth in this manner, 'iai mtMv sbi iinn* mV « He shall not covet nor desire (after a sensitive manner,) but man shall return in the times of the Messiah to that primitive state he was in before the sin of the first man, who naturally did whatsoever was good, neither was there any thing and its contrary then in his choice.' Upon which ground he afterwards concludes, That in those times of the Messiah there shaU neither be merit nor demerit, because there shall be no free will, which is the alone mother and nurse of both of them : but in the mean while, that good or evil are to men (that I may phrase it in the language of the Stoic) iksuhsga, axaJkura, airagspirbhtara' none prejudicing or in the least degree hindering the ex ercise of this liberty, neither from within nor from without, ' none either in heaven or in earth' ya t nides expounds that solemn attestation,* wherein heaven and earth are called to witness, that that day life and death were set before them ; as if God himself had now established such a monarchical power in man, which heaven and earth should be in league withal and faithful to. . Hereupon R. Saadia Gaon (so called by way of eminency) doubts not to tell us, that the common sense of aU the Jewish doctors was, That this liberty to good or evU was such an absolute kind of autho rity established in a man's soul, that it was in a sort * peut. xxx. 1 9. EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 319 independent upon God himself; this being, as he saith (in the book called Sepher Emunah) the mean ing of that old and vulgar maxim amongst the Jews, sometimes mentioned in the Talmud, ^a v D'n^n r-\*-va yin a»u?n n'3 Omnia sunt in manu Coeli (i. e. Dei) excepto timore Dei. I am not ignorant there is another axiom of the Jews as common, which may seem partly to cross this and what hitherto hath been spoken, viz. xa ib vnnia NSnn^ r**3 ini« W'oo inta'1? the meaning of which is this, ' That assistance is perpetually af forded to all endeavours both of sanctity and im piety.' But Maimonides hath somewhere told us (and, as I remember, in his Sepher Hamedang) how they mince the matter, and mean nothing else by it but this, That when men endeavour after the per formance of the law, God in a way of providence furnisheth them with external matter and means,1 giving them peace and riches and other outward accommodations, whereby they might have advan tage and opportunity to perform all that good which their own free-will determines them to : whereas wicked men find the like help of external matter and means for promoting and accomplishing their wicked and ungodly designs. Thus we see how the Jews, that they might lay a foundation of merit, and build up the stately and magnificent fabric of their happiness upon the sandy foundation of a dead letter without them, endea voured to strengthen it by as weak a rampart of their own self-sufficiency and the power of their own free will, able, as they vainly imagined, to perform all righteousness, as being adequate and commensurate to the whole law of God in its most extensive and 3^0 OF LEGAL AND comprehensive sense and meaning ; rather looking upon the fall of man as the rise of that giant-like free-will whereby they were enabled to bear them selves up against heaven itself, as being a great acces sory to their happiness, rather than prejudicial to it, through the access of that multitude of divine laws which were given to them ; as we shall see after wards. And so they reckoned upon a more trium phant and illustrious kind of happiness victoriously to be achieved by the merit of their own works, than that beggarly kind of happiness (as they seem to look upon it) which cometh like an alms from divine bounty. Accordingly they affirm, ' That happiness '-'man T" Sp by way of reward is far greater and much more magnificent than that which is nonn Tn Sy by way of mercy.' CHAP. III. The second ground of the Jewish notion qf a legal righteousness, viz. That the law delivered to them on mount Sinai was a suffi cient dispensation from God, and all that needed to be done by him to bring them to perfection and happiness : and that the scope qf their law was nothing but to afford them several ways and means qf merit. The opinion qf the Jewish writers con cerning merit and the reward due to the works qf the Ian. Their distinguishing of men in order to merit and demerit into three sorts, viz. perfectly righteous, perfectly vncked, and a mid dle sort betwixt these. The mercenary and low spirit qf the Jewish religion. An account qf what the Cabalisls held in this point qf legal righteousness. JL HE second ground of that Jewish notion of a legal righteousness is this, ' That the law delivered EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 321 to them upon mount Sinai was a sufficient dispen sation from God, and all that needed to be done by him for the advancing of them to a state of perfec tion and blessedness ; and that the proper scope and end of their law was nothing but to afford them several ways and means of merit.' Which is expressly delivered in the Mishnah,* nur? na"pn run 'iai Ssnr ns. The meaning whereof is this, that therefore the precepts of the law were so many in number, that so they might single out where they pleased, and in exercising themselves therein pro cure eternal life ; as Obadias de Bartenora ex pounds it, ' That whosoever shaU perform any one of the six hundred and thirteen precepts of the law (for so many they make in number) without any worldly respects, for love of the precept, njn isan thy} "n1? na mat behold, this man shall merit thereby everlasting life.' For indeed they sup posed a reward due to the performance of every precept, which reward they supposed to be increas ed according to the secret, estimation which God himself hath of any precept, as we find suggested in the Mishnah, in the book Pirke Avoth, in the words of the famous R. Jehuda, rhp nisna -vnt 'in 'iai nninnas « Be careful to observe the lesser pre cept as weU as the greater, because thou knowest not the reward that shall be given to the observa tion of the precepts.' Here we must take notice that this was a great debate among the Jews, which precepts they were that had the greatest reward due to the perform ance of them ; in which controversy Maimonides * Lib. Maccoth, sect. ult. Ss 322 OF LEGAL AND in his comment upon this place thus resolves us, That the measure of the reward that was annexed to the negative precepts might be coUected from the measure of the punishments that were conse quent upon the breach of them. But this knot could not be so well solved in reference to the affirm ative precepts, because the punishments annexed to the breach of them were more rarely defined in the law : accordingly he expresseth himself to this sense, ' As for the affirmative precepts fiiW nivo it is not expressed what reward is due to every one of them ; and aU for this end, that we may not know which precept is most necessary to be observed, and which precept is of less necessity and importance.' And a little after he tells us, that for this reason their wise men said, nwnn ya lies nam poiyn Qui ope- ram dat praecepto, liber est aprxcepto ; which he ex pounds to this sense, That whosever shall exercise himself about any one precept, ought without hesita tion or dispute to continue in the performance of it, as being in the mean while freed from minding any other. For, if God had declared which precepts him self had most valued and settled the greatest revenue of happiness upon, then other precepts would have been less minded ; and any one that should have busied himself in a precept of a lower nature, would presently have left that, when opportunity should have been offered of performing a higher. And hence we have also another Talmudical canon for the performing of precepts, of the same nature with the former quoted by our foresaid author, r-iixnn Sj? pajw -ya < It is not lawful to skip over precepts,' that is, as he - expounds it, ' When a man is about to observe one precept, he may not skip EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 323 over and relinquish that, that so he might apply himself to the observation of another.' And thus, as the performance of any precept hath a certain reward annexed to it ; so the measure of the re ward they suppose to be increased according to the number of those precepts which they observe, as it is defined by R. Tarphon in the foresaid Mishnah^ cap. 2;, "iai r-ia-in naip i1? wnu r-n-in min ma1? dk ' If thou hast been much in the study of the law, thou shalt be rewarded much : for faithful is thy Lord and Master, who wUl render to thee a re ward proportionable to thy work.' And a little before we have the same thing in the words of another of their masters, a"n nana min nana Qui multiplicat legem, multiplicat vitam. And lest they should not yet be liberal enough of God's cost, they are also pleased to distribute rewards to* any Israelite that shall abstain from the breach of a precept ; for so we find it in the Mishnah Lib. Kiddushin, * Whosoever keeps himself from the breach of a precept, nixa nu/iya -av i1? ara shall receive the reward as if he had kept the pre- eept.' But this which hath been, said concerning the performance of any one precept, must be under stood with this caution, that the performance of su,ch a precept be a continued thing,, so as that it may compound and coUect the performance of many good works into itself j otherwise the single performance of any one precept is only available, according to the sense of the Talmudical masters, to cast the scale* when a man's good works and evil works equaUy balance one another, as Mai monides telleth us in his comment upon the fore- 324 OF LEGAL AND named Mishnah, * where the words of the Jew ish doctors are these, "01 r-\m r-iisn rwnyn ba « He that observes any one precept, it shall be well with him, and his days shall be prolonged, and he shall possess the earth : but he that observes not any one precept, it shaU not be well with him, nor shall his days be prolonged, nor shall he inherit the earth.' Which words are thus expounded by Maimonides, ' He that observes any one precept, &c. that is, so as that by the addition of this work to his other good works, his good works overweigh his evil works, and his merits preponderate his de merits.' i For the better understanding whereof we must know, that the Jewish doctors are wont to distin guish of three sorts of men, which are thus ranked by them, aniaj aij?a in the world to come.' I know that the notion here, of ' the world to come,' is dif ferently represented by Nachmanides and Maimo nides, and their followers. But whether Maimoni des' sect or the other prevail in this point, it is not much material as to our present business, seeing both sides conclude that this seeulum futurum, or world to come, points out such a state of happi ness, as should not revolve or sHde back again into misery. And by the way, we may observe what a lean and spiritless religion this of the Jews was, and how it was nothing else but a soulless and life less form of external performances, which did little or nothing at aU reach the inward man, being nothing but a mere bodily kind of drudgery and servility: and therefore our Saviour, when he models out reHgion to them, points them out to something fuUer of inward life and spirit, and such a one as might make them " perfect, as their Father in heaven is perfect."* Such dull heavy-spirited principles as this Talmudical doctrine we have quoted affordeth us, very probably began to pos sess the chair in Antigonus' time, who therefore * Matt. v. 48. 328 OF LEGAL AND put in this caution against part of it, that God was not to be served so much upon the account of merit and for hope of wages, as out of love ; though his disciples Sadoc andBaithus, the founders ofthe sect of the Sadducees, straining that sober principle too far, might more strengthen that mercenary be Hef amongst the other doctors which they had be fore entertained. But before I leave this argument, it may not be amiss to examine also what the cabalistical Jews thought concerning this matter in hand ; which in sum is this, ' That the law delivered upon mount Sinai was a device God had to knit and unite the Jews and the Shechinah, or divine presence, toge ther.' Therefore they are pleased to style it in the book Zohar, which is one of the most ancient mo numents we have of the Jewish learning, "m 'tin ' the treasures of life.' And as if the living God could be united to the souls of men by such a dead letter as this was, as it is styled by the Apostle,* they are pleased to make this external administra tion the great vinculum Dei et hominis. And to this purpose R. Simeon Ben Jochai, the compiler of the fore-quoted book, which is a mystical com ment upon the Pentateuch, discourseth upon those words " He is thy life, and the length of thy days,"+ upon which he grounds this observation, ns1? Njnraiy mm ayNi1™ sia^na * The Shechinah, or divine pre sence, is no where established but by the mediation of the law :' and a little after he thus magnifies the study of the law, '«i NJnmx Sinm yxa Ha « Whoso ever doth exercise himself in the law, doth merit * 2 Cor. iii. f Deut. xxx. 20. EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 329 the possession of the upper inheritance which is in the holy kingdom above ; and doth also merit the possession of an inheritance here below in this world.' Where by the way we may take notice that the ancient Jews looked upon the inheritances of the land of Canaan as being typical and signifi cative of a higher inheritance in the kingdom of heaven ; both which they supposed to be the due rewards of men's works : and therefore they talk so much in the same place of guardian angels which are continually passing to and fro between heaven and earth, as the heralds and messengers of men's good works to God in heaven. And further upon those words, " Ye shall keep my statutes and judg ments ; which if a man do, he shall live in them,"* he tells us, ' That the portion of Israel is merito rious, because that the Holy blessed One delighteth in them above all the idolatrous nations ; and out of his favour and goodness to them, gave them owp-i yam*: the laws of truth, and planted amongst them the tree of life ; and the Shechinah was with them. Now what doth all this signify ? thus much, that since the IsraeHtes are signed with the holy seal in their flesh, they are thereby acknowledged for the sons of God : as on the contrary, they that are not sealed with this mark in their flesh, are not the sons of God, but are the children of unclean ness : wherefore it is not lawful to contract famili arity with them, or to teach them the words of the law.' Which afterwards is urged further by ano ther of their masters, ' Whosoever instructeth any uncircumcised person * ovrt iv ipwxip • truly and really in the soul,' that I may use Plato's words in his Phasdrus, where he commends the im pressions of truth which are made upon men's souls above aU outward writings, which he therefore com pares to dead pictures. By this we see what the wisest and best phUosophers thought of this internal writing ; but it peculiarly belongs to God to write the laws of goodness in the tables of men's hearts. All the outward teachings of men are but dead things in themselves. But God's imprinting his mind and will upon men's hearts is properly that which is caUed the teaching of God, and then they become living laws written in the living tables of men's hearts fitted to receive and retain divine im pressions. I shall only add that speech of Crollius the chymist, not impertinent in this place, Non tam discendo quam patiendo divina perficitur mens hu mana. And that we may come a little nearer to these words upon which all this present discourse is built, this seems to be the scope of his argument in this place, where this vbpog hixuioauvr\g, " law of righteous ness," may fairly be paralleled with that which be fore he called vbu,ov irvsbpurog " the law of the spirit," and which he therefore calls hixatoauvrjv iriarscag " the righteousness of faith," because it is received from God in a way of believing. For I cannot easuy think that he should mean nothing else in this place but merely the righteousness of justification, as some would persuade us, but rather that his 342 OF LEGAL AND sense is much more comprehensive, so as to include the state of gospel-dispensation, which includes not only pardon of sins, but an inward spirit " of love, power, and of a sound mind," * as he expresseth it. And this he thus opposeth to the law. " But the righteousness of faith speaketh on this wise, Say not in thy heart, Who shaU ascend into heaven, &c. or, Who shall descend into the deep ? But what saith it ? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart, that is, the word of faith which we preach." t In which words CunaBus in his De Repub. Hebr. would have us to understand some cabala or tradition amongst the Jews for this meaning of that place from which these words are borrowed, X which as they there stand, seem not to carry that evangelical sense which here St. Paul expounds them into ; though yet Cunaeus hath not given us any reason for this opinion of his. But indeed the Jewish writers, generally, who were acquainted with the principles of the cabala com menting upon that place, do wholly refer it to the times of the Messiah, making it parallel with that place of Jeremiah- which defines the new covenant to be " a writing of the law of God in men's hearts." § And thus that life and salvation that results from the righteousness of faith is all, as faith itself is, derived from God, gratuitously dis pensing himself to the minds of men : whereas if life could have been by the law, its original and prin cipal must have been resolved into men themselves, who must have acted that dead matter without them, and have produced that virtue and energy in * 2 Tim. i. 7. f Rom. a. 6, &c. J Deut. xxx. 12. § Jer. xxxi. 33. EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 343 it, by their exercising themselves therein, which of itself it had not ; as the observance of any law enables that law itself to dispense that reward which is due to the observance of it : and therefore the righteousness of the law was so defined that " he that did those things should live in them." And thus the New Testament every where seems to present to us this twofold dispensation or economy, the one consisting in an external and written law of precepts, the other in inward life and power. Which St. Austin hath well pursued in his book De Litera et Spiritu, from which Aquinas, who endeavours to tread in his footsteps, seems to have taken first of all an occasion of moving that ques tion, Utrum lex nova sit lex scripta, vel lex indita ; and thus resolves it, that the new law or gospel is not properly lex scripta, as the old was, but lex in dita: and that the old law is foris scripta, the other intus scripta, written in the tables of the heart. Now from aU this we may easily apprehend how much the righteousness of the gospel transcends that of the law, in that it hath indeed a true com mand over the inward man which it acts and in forms ; whereas the law by all its menaces and punishments, could only compel men to an exter nal observance of it in the outward man ; as the schoolmen have well observed, Lex vetus ligat ma- num, lex nova ligat animum. And herein St. Paul every where magnifies this dispensation of the free mercy and grace of God, as being the only sovereign remedy against all the inward radicated maladies of sin and corruption, as that panacea or balsamum vita' which is the uni- 344 OF LEGAL AND versal restorative of decayed and impotent nature. So he tells us, " Sin shall not have dominion, be cause we are not under the law, but under grace." * And this is that which made him so much extol his acquaintance with Christ in the dispensation of grace, arid to despise all things as loss ; where, among his other Jewish privileges, having reckoned up his blamelessness in all points touching the law, he undervalues them all, and counts all but loss hid rb uiregiyjiv rrjg yvuaewg, " for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus." t In which place the apostle doth not mean to disparage a real inward righteousness, and the strict observance of the law ; but his meaning is to show how poor and worthless a thing all outward observances of the law are in comparison of a true internal conformity to Christ in the renovation of the mind and soul according to his image and likeness ; as is manifest from ver. 9, 10, &c. in which he thus delivers his own meaning of that knowledge of Christ which he so much extolled, very emphatically, " That I may be found in him, not having mine own right eousness which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith." Where by the way, we may further take notice what this hixuioauvri iriarsug and htxuioavvn ©sou, " the righteousness of faith" and " the righteousness of God," (which we have al- - ready spoke much of) is, according to his own true meaning, as he expounds himself) viz. a Christ? Hkeiiature^in a man's soul, or Christ appearing in I the minds of men by the mighty power of his di- " Rom vi. 14. f Phil. iii. 8. EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 345 vine Spirit, and thereby deriving a true participa tion of himself to them : so we have it ver. 10. " That I may know the power of his resurrection, and the feUowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death." And thus Christ and Moses are opposed, as Christ is the dispen ser of grace and truth, of God's free and gratui tous bounty, of Hfe and substance : whereas Moses was but the minister of the law, of rites and sha dows. But it may perhaps be questioned whether the same internal dispensation of God was |not as well under the law, as since our Saviour's coming, and so consequently that the Jews were equaUy par takers thereof; and so it could be no new thing to them. To all which I might reply, that this dispensa tion of grace was then a more mystical thing, and not so manifested to the world as it hath been since our Saviour's coming. Secondly, This dispensation of free grace was not that which properly belonged to the nation of the Jews, but only a type and sha dow of it. For the fuUer understanding of which, and all that hath been spoken, we must know, that before our Saviour's coming, the great mysteries of reli gion being wrapt up in hieroglyphics and symboli cal rites, (the unfolding of aH which was reserved for him who is the great Interpreter of heaven and Master of truth) God was pleased to draw forth a scheme or copy of aU that divine economy and method of his commerce with mankind, and to make a draught of the whole artifice thereof in external matter : and therefore he singled out a 346 OF LEGAL AND company and society of men of the same common extraction, marked out from all other sorts of men by a character of genealogical sanctity (for so cir cumcision was,) collected and united together by a common band of brotherhood ; and this he set up as an emblem of a diyine and holy seed or society of men which are all by way of spiritual generation descended from himself. And hence it is that the Jews (the whole Jewish nation universally con sidered) who were but a mere representative of this spiritual fraternity and congregation, are called fhe holy seed or the holy people. Then afterwards amongst these he erects a government and polity, and rules over them in the way and manner of a political prince, as hath been long since well ob served by Josephus, who therefore properly caUs the Jewish government Seoxguriuv, • a theocracy,' or * the government of God himself,' And thus in a scheme or figure he shadows forth that spiritual kingdom and government which he would establish amongst that divine society of men, in reference to which we have so much mention made of the kingdom of heaven in the gospel, which is not generally and solely meant of the state of glory, much less of any outward church rites, but mainly of that idea and exemplar of which the Jewish theocracy was an imitation, Lastly, As a political prince, God draws forth a body of laws, as the political constitutions and rules of this go vernment which he had set up, choosing mount Sinai for the theatre whereon he would promulge those laws by which all his subjects should be go verned. And so I doubt not but that preface by EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 347 which the law is ushered in,* which speaks of God's mercy in delivering them from the Egyptian thral dom, may very well be allegorized and mystically expounded. And all this was to signify and set forth that law which was to go forth from mount Sion, the promulgation whereof was to be in a vital and spiritual way among the subjects of this spiri tual kingdom. To all whieh we may add those temporal inheritances which he distributed to the Jewish famUies, in imitation of that eternal blessed ness and those immortal inheritances which he shares out amongst his spiritual sons and subjects in heaven. And this I the rather add, because here tiie Jews are much perplexed about untying this knot, namely, what the reason should be that their law speaks so sparingly of any eternal reward, but runs out generally in promises of mundane and earthly blessings' in the land of Canaan. But by this we may see the true reason of that wliich the apostle speaks concerning them, " Uritil this day rb aurb xukuppu the same vail in the reading of the the Old Testament (/jsvsi pj uvuxakuirrbpevov remain eth1 untaken away.''t That vail which was on the face of Moses, was an: emblem of all this great mys- - tery: and this' vail was upon the face of the Jews in their reading- the Old1 Testament'; they dwelling' so much in a1 carnal converse With these sacramen tal symbols wliich were offered to them in the read' ing of the law, that they could not see through them into the thing signified thereby, and so em braced ' shadbws instead of substance, and made ac count to build up happiness and heaven upon that earthly law to which properly the land of Canaan' * Exod. xx. 2. t 2 Cor- ™- I4- 348 OF LEGAL AND was annexed : whereas indeed this law should have been their " schoolmaster to have led them to Christ,"* whose law it prefigured ; which, that it might do the more effectuaUy, God had annexed to the breach of any one part of it such severe curses, that they might from thence perceive how much need they had of some further dispensation. And therefore this state of theirs is set forth by a state of bondage or irveupu houkelag. For aU exter nal precepts carry perpetually an aspect of austeri ty and rigour to those minds that are not informed by the internal sweetness of them. And this it is only which makes the gospel, or the new law, to be a free, noble, and generous thing, because it is seated in the souls of men : and therefore Aquinas, out of Austin, hath well observed another differ ence between the law and gospel, Brevis differentia inter legem et evangelium est timor et amor. This I the rather observe, because the true meaning of that spirit of bondage which the apostle speaks of is frequently mistaken. We might further, (if need were) for a confirmation of this which we have spoken concerning the typicalness of the whole Jewish economy, appeal to the third and fourth chapters of the Epistle to the Galatians, which can not well be understood without this notion, where we have the Jewish church, as a type of the true evangelical church, brought in as a child in its minority in servitude, under tutors and governors, shut up under the law till the time of that empha- tical revelation of the great mystery of God should come, tiU the day should break, and all the shadows of the night fly away. " Gal. iii. 24 EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 349 That I may return from this digression to the argument we before pursued, this briefly may be added, that under the old covenant, and in the time of the law, there were amongst the Jews some that were evangelized, that were re, non nomine Christiani ; as under the gospel there are many that f do judaize, are of as legal and servile spirits as the ' Jews, " chUdren of the bond-woman," resting in mere external observances of religion, in an out ward seeming purity, in a form of godliness, as did the Scribes and Pharisees of old. From what hath hitherto been discoursed, I hope the difference between both covenants clearly ap pears, and that the gospel was not brought in only to hold forth a new platform and model of religion ; it was not brought in only to refine some notions of truth, that might formerly seem discoloured and disfigured by a multitude of legal rites and ceremo nies; it was not to cast our opinions concerning the way of life and happiness only into a new mould and shape in a pedagogical kind of way : it is not so much a system and body of saving divin- ity, but the spirit "and vital influx of it spreading itself oveTaTItne"powers of men's souls, and quick ening them into a divine life : it is not so properly ™ ai3ocTJme that is wrapt up in ink and paper, as it is vitalis scientia, a Hying impression made upon the soul anidspitit. We may in a true sense be as le gal asliverthe Jews were, if we converse with the gospel as a thing only without us ; and be as far short of the righteousness of God as they were, if we make the righteousness which is of Christ by faith to serve us only as an outward covering, and endeavour not after an internal transformation of 350 OF LEGAL AND our minds and souls into it. The gospel does not so much consist in verbis as in virtute .- neither doth evangelical dispensation therefore please God so much more than the legal did, because, as a finer contrivance of his infinite understanding, it more clearly discovers the way of salvation to the minds of men ; but chiefly because it is a more powerful efflux of his divine goodness upon them, as being the true seed of a happy immortality continually thriving and growing on to perfection. I shall add further, the gospel does not therefore hold forth j such a transcendent privilege and advantage above ; what the law did, only because it acquaints us that ; Christ our true high priest is ascended up into the holy of holies, and there, instead of the blood of bulls and goats, hath sprinkled the ark and mercy- seat above with his own blood : but also because it. conveys that blood of sprinkling into our defiled) consciences, to purge them from dead works* Far be it from me to disparage in the least the merit of Christ's bloods, his becoming obedient unto deaths whereby we are justified. But I doubt sometimes some of our dogmata and notions about justification) may puff us. up> in far higher and goodlier conceits of ourselves than God hath of us ; and that we pro fanely make the unspotted righteousness of Christ to serve only as a covering wherein, to wrap up our foul deformities and filthy vices; and when we have> done, think ourselves in as good) credit and; repute witb God as we are with ourselves, and that we are become heaven's dariingsas much as we are our own, I doubt not but the- merit and1 obedience' of our Saviour gain us favour with God; and' po tently move down the benign influences of heaven EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 351 upon us : but yet I think we may sometimes be j too lavish and wanton in our imaginations, in j fondly conceiting a greater change in the esteem ! which God hath of us than becomes us, and tooj little reckon upon the real and vital emanations' of his favour upon us. < Therefore, for the further clearing of what hath been already said, and laying a ground upon which the next part of our discourse (viz. concerning the conveyance of this godlike righteousness to us by faith) is to proceed, we shall here speak something more to the business of justification and divine acceptance, which we shall dispatch in two parti culars. «X^ ^ CHAP. V. Two propositions for the better understanding of the doctrine of justification and divine acceptance. 1. Prop. That the divine judgment and estimation qf every thing is according to the truth ofthe thing; and God's acceptance or disacceptance qf things is suitable to his judgment. On what account St. James does attribute a kind qf justification to good works. 2. Prop. God's justifying qf sinners in pardoning their sins carries in it a necessary reference to the sanctifying qf their natures. This abundantly proved from the nature ofthe thing. yJUR first proposition is this, The divine judg ment and estimation of every thing is according to the truth of the thing ; and God's acceptance or dis- I acceptance qf things is suitable and proportionable to his judgment. Thus St. Peter plainly tells us, " God " 352 OF LEGAL AND is no respecter of persons ; but every one that work eth righteousness is accepted of him."* And God himself posed Cain, who had entertained those un worthy and ungrounded suspicions of his partiality, with that question, " If thou doest weU, shalt thou not be accepted ?"t Wheresoever God finds any stamps and impressions of goodness, he likes and approves them, knowing them well to be what they indeed are, nothing else but his own image and | superscription. Wherever he sees his own image ' shining in the souls of men, and a conformity of l Hfe to that eternal idea of goodness which is him- 1 self, he loves it and takes a complacency in it, as {that which is from himself, and is a true imitation (of himself. And as his own unbounded being and goodness is the primary and original object of his immense and almighty love : so also every thing that partakes of him, partakes proportionably of his love ; all imitations of him and participations of his love and goodness are perpetually adequate and commensurate the one to the other. By so much the more acceptable any one is to God, by how much the more he comes to resemble God. It was a common notion in the old Pythagorean and Platonic theology, fbv A/a psrua-fflyiiuria'&svra sig rbv sgura, &c. as Proclus phraseth it, that the Divinity transformed into love, and enamoured with its own unlimited perfections and spotless beauty, delighted to copy forth and shadow out itself as it were in created beings, which are perpetually embraced in the warm bosom of the same love, from which they can never swerve nor apostatize, till they also * Acts x. 34, 35. f Gen. iv. 7. EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 353 prove apostate to the estate of their creation. And certainly it is true in our Christian divinity, that that divine light and goodness which flows forth from God, the original of all, upon the souls of men, never goes solitary and destitute of love, complacency, and acceptation, which is always lodged together with it in the divine essence. And as the divine complacency thus dearly and tenderly entertains all those which bear a similitude of true goodness upon them ; so it always abandons from its embraces all evil, which never doth nor can mix itself with it: the Holy Spirit can never suffer any unhallowed or defiled thing to enter into it, or to unite itself with it. Therefore, in a sober / sense, I hope I may truly say, there is no perfect reconcUiation wrought between God and the souls of men, while any defiled and impure thing dwells within the soul, which cannot truly close with God, nor God with that. The divine love, ac- j cording to those degrees by which it works upon the souls of men in transforming them into its i own likeness, by the same it renders them more I acceptable to itself, mingleth itself with, and ! uniteth itself to, them : as the spirit of any thing mixeth itself more or less with any matter it acts upon, according as it works itself into it, and so makes a way and passage open for itself. Upon this account, I suppose it may be, that St. James attributes a kind of justification to good works, which unquestionably are things that God approves and accepts, and all those in whom he finds them, as seeing there a true conformity to his own goodness and holiness. Whereas,, on the other side, he disparageth that barren, sluggish, Yy 354 OF LEGAL AND and drowsy belief, that a lazy lethargy in religion began in his times so much to cherish, in reference to acceptation with God. I suppose I may fairly thus gloss at his whole discourse upon this argu ment: God respects not a bold, confident, and audacious faith, that is big with nothing but its own presumptions. It is not because our brains swim with a strong conceit of God's eternal love to us, or because we grow big and swell into a mighty bulk with airy fancies and presumptions of our ac ceptance with God, that makes us the more ac ceptable to him : it is not all our strong dreams of being in favour with heaven that fiUs our hungry souls the more with it: it is not a pertinacious imagination of our names being enrolled in the book of life, or of the debt-books of heaven being crossed, or of Christ being ours, while we findjiim not living within us, or of the washing away of our sins in his blood, whUe the foul and filthy stains thereof are deeply sunk in our own souls ; it is not, I say, a pertinacious imagination of any 1 of these that can make us the better : and a mere conceit or opinion, as it makes us never the better in reality within ourselves, so it cannot render us the more acceptable to God, who judges of all things as they are. No^it must be a true compliance with the divine will, which must render us such as the Divinity may take pleasure in. "In Christ Jesus nei ther CircTrmcision nor uncircumcision avaUeth any thing/' nor any fancy built upon any other external privilege, " but the keeping of the commandments of God."* No, but " if any man does the wiU of ' 1 Cor. vii. 19, 3 EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 355 God, him will both the Father and the Son love ; they wiU come in to him and make their abode with him."* This is the scope and mark at which a true heaven-born faith aims ; and when it hath at tained this end, then is it indeed perfect and com plete in its last accomplishment. And by how much the more ardency and intention faith levels at this mark of inward goodness and divine ac tivity, by so much the more perfect and sincere it is. This is that which God justifies, it being just and correspondent to his own good pleasure : and in whomsoever he finds this, both it and they are accepted of him. And so I come to the second particular. 2. God's justifying qf sinners in pardoning and re mitting their sins carries in it a necessary reference to the sanctifying qf their natures ; without which jus tification would rather be a glorious name than a real privelege to the souls of men. While men con tinue in then- wickedness, they do but vainly dream of a device to restrain the hands of an almighty vengeance from seizing on them : no, their own sins, like so many armed giants, would first or last set upon them, and rend them with inward torment. There needs no angry cherub with a flaming sword drawn out every! way to keep their unhaUowed hands from the tree of life : no, their own prodigious lusts, like so many arrows in their sides, would chase them, their own hellish natures would sink them low enough into eternal death, and chain them up fast enough in fetters of darkness among the filthy fiends of hell. Sjn will always be miser- » John xiv. 23. 356 OF LEGAL AND able ; and the sinner at last, when the empty blad ders of all those hopes and expectations of an airy mundane happiness, that did here bear him up in this life, shall be cut, wUl find it like a talent of lead weighing him down into the bottomless gulf of misery. If aU were clear towards heaven, we (should find sin raising up storms in our souls. We cannot carry fire in our own bosoms, and yet not be burnt. Though we could suppose the greatest serenity without us, if we could suppose ourselves here so much to be at truce with heaven, and all di vine displeasure laid asleep ; yet would our own sins, if they continue unmortified, first or last, make an JEtna or Vesuvius within us. Nay those sunbeams of eternal truth, that by us are detained in unrigh teousness, would at last in those hellish vaults of vice and darkness that are within us, kindle into an unquenchable fire. It would be of small benefit to us, that Christ hath triumphed over the principali ties and powers of darkness without us, while hell and death, strorigly immured in a fort of our own sins and corruptions, should tyrannise within us : that his blood should speak peace in heaven, if in the mean whUe our own lusts were perpetually war- / ring and fighting in and against our own souls : that ' he hath taken off our guilt and cancelled that hand writing that was against us, which bound us over to : eternal condemnation ; if for all this we continue \ fast sealed up in the hellish dungeon of our own | filthy lusts. Indeed we could not expect any relief from heaven out of that misery under which we lie, were not God's displeasure against us first paci- I fied, and our sins remitted : but should the divine 1 clemency stoop no lower to us than to a mere par- EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 357 don of our sins and an abstract justification, we should never rise out of that misery under which we lie. This is the signal and transcendent benefit | of our free justification through the blood of Christ, | that God's offence justly conceived against us fori our sins (which would have been an eternal bar and ; restraint to the efflux of his grace upon us) being; removed, the divine grace and bounty may freely flow forth upon us. The fountain of the divine grace and love is now unlocked and opened, which J our sins had shut up ; and now the streams of holi- 1 ness and true goodness from thence freely flow forth1' into all gasping souls that thirst after them. The warm sun of the divine love, whenever it breaks ]. through and scatters the thick cloud of our iniqui- / ties that had formerly separated between God and ' us, it immediately breaks forth upon us with " heal ing in its wings ;" it exerciseth the mighty force of its own light and heat upon our dark and benumb ed souls, begetting in them a lively sense of God, I and kindling into sparks of divine goodness within.: us. This love, when once it hath chased away the thick mist of our sins, it will be " as strong as death > upon us, as potent as the grave : many waters wUl t not quench it, nor the floods drown it."* If we shut not the windows of our souls against it, it wUl at last enlighten all those regions of darkness that \ are within us, and lead our souls to the light of life, blessedness, and immortality. God pardons men's : sins out_ofjflJ^eraa| ,_design of destroying them ; j andTwhenever the sentence of death is taken off1 froinJa^sinnerT it is at the same time denounced * Song viii. 6, 7. 358 OF LEGAL AND against his sins. God does not bid us be warmed ancTbe filled, and deny us those necessaries which our starving and hungry souls call for. Christ hav ing made peace through the blood of his cross, the heavens shall be no more as iron above us : but we shall receive freely the vital dew of them, the for mer and the latter rain in their season, thosg^ influ-^ ences from above, after which souls, truly sensible ofjtheir_ own misery and imperfection, incessantly gasp ; that righteousness of God which drops from above, from the unsealed spring of free goodness which makes glad the city of God. This is that free love and grace, in which the souls of good men so much triumph ; this is that justification which begets in them lively hopes of a happy immortaHty, in the present anticipations thereof which spring forth from it in this life. And all this is that whieh we have sometimes called " the righteousness of Christ," sometimes " the righteousness of God and here, " the righteousness which is of faith In heaven it is a not-imputing of sin ; in the souls of men it is a reconciliation of rebelHous natures , to truth and goodness. In heaven it is the lifting I upVineiight of God's countenance upon us, which i begets a gladsome entertainment in the souls of | men, holy and dear reflections and reciprocations of \ love : divine love to us, as it were by a natural i emanation, begetting a reflex love in us towards God, which, like that egag and avr'sgcog spoken of by the ancients, live and thrive together. > » EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 359 / 1/ l/ chap. vi. ^ y ^ How the gospel-righteousness, is conveyed to us by faith, made to appear from these two considerations. 1. The gospel lays a strong foundation qf a cheerful dependance tipon the grace and love qf God, and affiance in it. This confirmed by several gos pel expressions containing plainly in them the most strong mo tives and encouragements to all ingenuous addresses to God, to all cheerful dependance on him, and corifidenl expectation qf all assistance from him. 2. A true evangelical faith is no lazy or languid thing, but an ardent breathing and thirsting after divine grace and righteousness : it looks beyond a mere pardon qf sin, and mainly pursues after an inward participation qf the divine nature. The mighty power qfa living faith in the love and good ness of God, discoursed qf throughout the whole chapter. W E come now to the last part of our discourse, viz. To show the way by which this godlike and gospel-righteousness is conveyed to us : and that is by faith. This is that powerful attractive which by ; a strong and divine sympathy draws down the virtue of heaven into the souls of men, which strongly and forcibly moves the souls of good men into a conjunction with that divine goodness by j which it lives and grows : this is that divine im- j press that invincibly draws and sucks them in by I degrees into the Divinity, and so unites them more < and more to the centre of life and love : it is some times in the hearts of men which, feeling by an oc cult and inward sensation the mighty insinuations of the divine goodness,, immediately complies with it, and, with the greatest ardency that may be, is per- ; petually rising up into conjunction with it ; and 360 OF LEGAL AND j being first begotten , and enHvened by the warm S beams of that goodness, it always breathes and gasps after it for its constant growth and nourishment. It is then fullest of life and vivacity, when it par- jtakes most freely of it ; and perpetually languish- ieth when it is in any measure deprived of that I sweet and pure nourishment it derives from it. But that we may the more clearly unfold this business, how gospel-righteousness comes to be communicated through faith, we shall lay it forth in two particulars. Fjrst, The gospel lays a strong foundation of a cheerful dependance upon the grace and love qf God, and affiance in it. We have the greatest security and assurance that may be given us of God's readi ness to relieve such forlorn and desolate creatures as we are : that there are no such dreadful fates in heaven as are continually thirsting after the blood of sinners, insatiably greedy after their prey, never satisfied tUl they have devoured the souls of men. Lest we should by such dreadful apprehensions be driven from God, we are told of the " blood of sprinkling that speaks better things"* for us ; of a mighty favourite soliciting our cause with perpetual intercessions in the court of heaven ; of "JJ^w^nd..Hyingway" to the throne of grace, and to the holy of holies which our Saviour hath " con secrated through his flesh :"t we are told of a great and mighty Saviour " able to save to the utmost" aU that come to God by him : we hear of the most compassionate and tender promises that may be from the truth itself, that " whosoever comes to * Heb. xii. 24. +¦ Ibid. x. 20. EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 36l him he will in no wise cast out ;"*' that " They that believe on him, out of them should flow streams of living water :"t we hear of the most gracious invitations that heaven can make to all "weary and heavy laden"t sinners to come to Christ, that they may find rest : the great secrets of hea ven and the arcana of divine counsels are revealed, whereby we are acquainted that " Glory to God in the highest, peace on earth, good-will towards men,"|| are sweetly joined together in heaven's harmony, and happUy combined together in the composure of its ditties: that the glory of the Deity and salvation of men are not aUayed by their union one with another, but both exalted to gether in the most transcendent way, that divine love and bounty are the supreme rulers in heaven and earth, xai (p^bvog 's\oj i'arurai rou %bgou, there is no such thing as sour despight and envy lodged in the bosom of that ever blessed Being above, whose name is LOVE, and aU whose dispensations to the sons of men are but the dispreadings and distended radiations of his love, as freely flowing forth from it through the whole orb and sphere of its creation, as the bright Hght from the sun in the firmament, of whose benign influences we are then only de prived when we hide and withdraw ourselves from them. We are taught that the mild and gentle breathings of the divine Spirit are moving up and down in the world to produce life, and to revive and quicken the souls of men into a feeling sense of a blessed immortality. This is that mighty Spirit that wiU, if we comply with it, " teach us * John vi. 37. f Ibid- vii- 38- t Mm- xi- 28, H Luke U" H' Zz 362 OF LEGAL AND all things,"* even the hidden things of God ; mor tify all the lusts of rebellious flesh, and " seal us up to the day of redemption."! We are taught that with all holy boldness we may " in all places lift up holy hands to God, without Wrath or doubting,":): without any sour thoughts of God, or fretful jealousies, or harsh surmises. We can never dis trust enough in ourselves, nor ever trust too much in God. This is the great plerophory, and that full confidence which the gospel every where seems to promote : and should I run through all the arguments and solicitations that are there laid down, to provoke us to an entertainment hereof, I should then run quite through it from one end to another: it containing almost nothing else in the whole complex and body of it, but strong and forcible motives to all ingenuous addresses to God, and the most effectual encouragement that may be to all cheerful dependence on him, and con fident expectation of all assistance from him to carry on our poor endeavours to the achievement of blessedness, and that in the most plain and simple way that may be, sine fraude et fuco, without any double mind or mental reservation; heaven is not acquainted so feelingly with our wicked arts and devices. But it is very strange that where God writes life so plainly in fair capi tal letters, we are so often apt to read death; that when he tells us over and over, that hell and destruction arise from ourselves, that they are the workmanship of our own hands, we will needs understand their pedigree to be from hea- * John xiv. 26. f EPh< '"• 15- t 1 lim- »'• 8- 3 EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 363 ven, and that they were conceived in the womb of life and blessedness. No, but the gospel tells us we are not come to ". mounts of burning," nor unto " blackness and darkness and tempest," &c* Certainly a lively faith in this love of God, and a sober converse with his goodness by a cor dial entertainment and thorough persuasion of it, would warm and chafe our benumbed minds, and thaw our hearts frozen with self-love ; it would make us melt and dissolve out of all self-consisten cy, and by a free and noble sympathy with the di vine love to yield up ourselves to it, and dilate and spread ourselves more fully in it. This would ban ish away all atheism and ireful slavish superstition; it would cast down every high thought and proud imagination that swells within us and exalts itself against this sovereign Deity ; it would free us from aU those poor, sorry, pinching, and particular loves that here inthral the souls of men to vanity and baseness; it would lead us into the true liberty of the sons of God, fiUing our hearts once enlarged with the sense of it with a more generous and uni versal love, as unlimited and unbounded as true goodness itself is. Thus Moses-like conversing with God in the mount, and there beholding his glory shining thus out upon us in the face of Christ, we should be deriving a copy of that eter nal beauty upon our own souls, and our thirsty and hungry spirits would be perpetually sucking in a true participation and image of his glory. A true divine love would wing our souls, and make them take their flight swiftly towards heaven and immor-^ * Heb. xii. 18, 364 OF LEGAL AND tality. Could we once be thoroughly possessed and mastered with a fuU confidence of the jHyine love, anaTGod's readiness to assist such feeble, languish ing" creatures"as we are, in our essays after heaven and blessedness, we should then, finding ourselves borne up by an eternal and almighty strength, dare to adventure courageously and confidently upon the highest designs of happiness, to assail the king dom of heaven with a holy gallantry and violence, to pursue a course of well-doing without weariness ; knowing that our labour shall not be in vain in the , Lord, and that we shall receive our reward, if we * faint not: we should work out our salvation in the ^most industrious manner, trusting in God as one } ready to instU strength and power into all the vital faculties of our souls : we should " press towards the mark, for the prize of the high caUing of God j in Christ Jesus, that we may apprehend that for \ which also we are apprehended of Christ Jesus."* If we suffer not ourselves to be robbed of this con fidence and hope in God as ready to accomplish the desires of those that seek after him, we may then walk on strongly in the way to heaven and not be weary ; we may run and not faint. And the more the souls of men grow in this blissful per suasion, the more they shaU mount up like eagles into a clear heaven, finding themselves rising high er and higher above all those filthy mists, those clouds and tempests of a slavish fear, despair, fret- fulness against God, pale jealousies, wrathful and embittered thoughts of him, or any stragglings or contests to get from within the verge of his power * Phil. iii. 14. EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 365 and omnisciency, which would mantle up their souls in black and horrid night. I mean not all this while by this holy boldness, and confidence, and presence of mind in a believer's converse with the Deity, that high pitch of assurance that wafts the souls of good men over the Stygian lake of death, and brings them to the borders of Hfe ; that here puts them into an actual possession of bliss, and re-estates and re-establishes them in paradise : no, that more general acquaintance which we may have with God's philanthropy and bounty, ready to relieve with the bowels of his tender com passions all those starving souls that call upon him, for surely he wiU never do less for fainting and drooping souls than he doth for the young ravens that cry unto him ; that converse which we are provoked by the gospel to maintain with God's un- confined love, if we understand it aright, will awaken us out of our drowsy lethargy, and make us " ask of him the way to Sion with our faces thitherward."* This will be digging up fresh foun tains for us whUe we go through the vaUey of Ba ca, whereby refreshing our weary souls we shall " go on from strength to strength until we see the face of our" loving and ever to be loved, " God in Sk>n."t And so I come to the next particular, wherein we shall further unfold how this godlike righteousness, of which we have spoken, is convey ed to us by faith : and that is this, Secondly. A true gospel-faith is no lazy or languid, thing, but a strong ardent breathing for, and thirst- 1 ing after, divine grace and righteousness : jt^doth notj • Jer. I. S. t Psa1- '"""fr- 7- 366 OF LEGAL AND only pursue an ambitious project of raising the soul immaturely to the condition of a darling favourite with heaven, while it is unripe for it, by procuring a mere empty pardon of sin ; it desires not orAyto sland iipbn clear terms with Heaven by procuring the crossing of aU the debt-books of our sms"there; but it rather pursues after an internal participation of -^r-r|t„lM^Mf"l\i«frr,-^i''i^*<1f'^M'r^Wfr'' ~t 'tv i i min inni i , | Mnii i lemvine nature. We often hear of a saving faith ; and that, where it is, is not content ti> wait jfor sal; vation tiU the world to come ; it is not patient of being arTexpectant iri'a pfobationership for it untU this earthly body resigns up all its worldly interest, that so the soul might then come into its room : no, but it is here perpetually gasping after it, and ef fecting it in a way of serious mortification and self- denial : it enlarges and dilates itself as much as may be according to the vast dimensions of the di vine love, that it may comprehend " the height and depth, the length and breadth" thereof, and ful the soul, where it is seated, " with all the fulness of God :" it breeds a strong and unsatiable appetite where it comes after true goodness. Were I to describe it, I should do it no otherwise than in the language of the apostle ; it is that whereby " we_ live in Christ," and whereby " he lives.. in us.;* or, in the dialect of our Saviour himself, something so powerfully sucking in the precious influences ofthe divine Spirit, that the soul where it is, is continual ly flowing with living waterst issuing out of itself. A truly believing soul, by an ingenuous affiance in God, and an eager thirst after him, is always suck ing from the full breasts of the divine love ; thence * GaU ii. 20. f John vii. 38. EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 367 it will not part, for there, and there only, is its life* and nourishment ; it starves and faints away with grief and hunger, whensoever it is pulled away from thence ; it is perpetuaUy hanging upon the arms of immortal goodness, for there it finds its great strength lies ; and, as much as may be, arms itself with the mighty power of God, by which it goes forth like a giant refreshed with wine, to run that race of grace and holiness that leads to the true Elysium of glory, and that heavenly Canaan which is above. And whensoever it finds itself enfeebled in its difficult conflict with those fierce and furious corruptions, those tall sons of Anak, which arising from our terrene and sensual affections do here en counter it in the wUderness of this world; then turning itself to God, and putting itself under the conduct of the Angel of his presence, it finds itself presently out of weakness to become strong, ena bled from above to put to flight those mighty armies of the aliens. True faith (if you would know its rise and pedigree) is begotten of the divine bounty and fulness manifesting itself to the spirits of men, and it is conceived and brought forth by a deep and humble sense of self-indigency and poverty. Faith arises out of self-examination, seating and placing itself in view of the divine plenitude and all-sufficiency ; and thus (that I may borrow those words of St. Paul) " we received the sentence of death in ourselves, that we should not trust in ourselves but in him."* The more this sensual, brutish, and self-central life thrives and prospers, the more divine faith languisheth ; and * 2 Cor. i. 9. 368 OF LEGAL AND ¦the more that decays, and all self-feeling, self-love, and self-sufficiency pine away, the more is- true faith fed and nourished, it grows more vigorous : and as carnal life wastes and consumes, so the more does faith suck in a true divine and spiritual life from the true Auro&ii who hath life in himself, and free ly bestows it to all those that heartily seek for it. L. WJienjhe Divinity united itself to human riature in the person of our Saviour, he then gave mankind a pledge and earnest of what he would further do therein, in bringing it into as near a conjunction as might be with himself) and in dispensing and com municating himseU' to man in a way as far corres pondent and agreeable as might be to that first co py. And therefore we are told of " Christ being formed in us," and " the Spirit of Christ dwelling in us ; of our being made conformable to him, of having feUowship with him, of being as he was in this world, of living in him and his living in us, of dying, and rising again, and ascending with him into heaven," and the like : because indeed the same Spirit that dwelt in him, extends itself in its mighty virtue and energy through all believing souls, shaping them more and more into a just re- , semblance and conformity to him as the first copy \ and pattern : whence it is that we have so many ! ways of unfolding the union between Christ and aU "; believers set forth in the gospel. And all this is [done for us by degrees, through the efficacy ofthe jeternal Spirit, when by a true faith we deny our- | selves and our own wUls, submit ourselves in a deep (sense of our own folly and weakness to his wisdom and power, comply with his will, and by a holy af- EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 369 fiance in him, subordinate ourselves to his pleasure : / for these are the vital actsjof a .gospel-f aith. ' And according to this which hath been said, 1 suppose we may fairly gloss upon St. Paul's dis courses which so much prefer faith above works. We must not think in a giant-hke pride to scale the waUs of heaven by oui' own works, and by force thereof to take the strong fort of blessedness, and wrest the crown of glory out of God's hands whe ther he will or no. We must not think to com mence a suit in heaven for happiness, upon such a poor and weak plea as our own external compliance with the old law is. We must not think to deal with God in the method of commutative justice, and to challenge eternal life as the just reward of our great merits, and the hire due to us for our la bour and toU we have took in God's vineyard. No, " God resists the proud, but gives grace to the humble:"* it must be a humble and self-denyingf address of a soul dissolved into a deep and piercing j sense of its own nothingness and unprofitableness, that can be capable of the divine bounty : " he fills the hungry with good things, but the rich he sends empty away."t They are the hungry and thirsty souls, always gasping after the Hving springs of divine grace, as the parched ground in the de sert doth for the dew of heaven, ready to drink them in by a constant dependance upon God ; souls that by a living, watchful, and diligent faith, spreading forth themselves in all obsequious rever ence and love of him, wait upon him " as the eyes of a handmaid wait on the hand of her mistress :" * James iv. 6. t Luke '• S3> 3 A 370 OF LEGAL AND these are they that he dehghts to satiate with his goodness. Those that being mastered by a strong sense of their own indigency, their pinching and | pressing poverty, and his all-sufficient fulness, trust in him as an almighty Saviour, and in the most ar dent manner pursue after that perfection to which I his grace is leading them ; those that cannot satisfy I themselves in a bare performance of some external lacts of righteousness, or an external observance of !a law without them, but with the most greedy and ; fervent ambition pursue after such an acquaintance with his divine Spirit as may breathe an inward life through all the powers of their souls, and beget in them a vital form and soul of divine goodness. These are the spiritual seed of faithful Abraham, the sons of the free-woman and heirs of the pro mises, to whom all are made " Yea and Amen in Christ Jesus."* These are they which shall abide in the house for ever, when the sons of the bond woman, those that are only Arabian proselytes, shall be cast out. * 2 Cor. i. 20. EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 371 y y ^ycuAP. vii. u^ y u An appendix to the foregoing discourse; How the whole business and undertaking qf Christ is eminently available both to give full relief and ease to our minds and hearts, and also to encourage us to godliness or a godlike righteousness, briefly represented in sun dry particulars. X* OR the further illustration of some things espe cially in the latter part of this discourse, it may not be amiss in some particulars, which might easfly be enlarged, to show, How the undertaking qf Christ, that great object of faith, is greatly advantageous and available to the giving full relief and ease to our minds and hearts, and also to the encouraging us to godliness, or a true godlike righteousness. In the general therefore we may consider, That fuU and evident assurance is given hereby to the world, that God doth indeed " seek the saving of that which is lost ;"* and men are no longer to make any doubt or scruple of it. Now what can we imagine more avaUable to carry on a design pf godliness, and to rouse dull and languid souls to an effectual minding of their own salvation, than to have this news sounding in their ears by men that, at the first promulgation thereof, durst teU them roundly in the name of God, that God re quired them every where to repent, for that his kingdom of grace was now .apparent ; and that he was not only willing, but it was his gracious design to save and recover lost sinners who had forsaken his goodness ? * Luke xix. 10. 3 372 OF LEGAL AND Particularly, that the whole business of Christ is very advantageous for this purpose, and highly accommodate thereto, may appear thus : 1. We are fully assured that God hath this fore- mentioned design upon lost men, because here is one (yiz^ Christ) that partakes every way of hu man nature, in whom the Divinity magnifies itself, and carries through this world in human infiririi- ties'and sufferings to eterrial glory: ajplear ma nifestation to the world that God had not cast off human nature, but had a real mind to "exalt an a 'dignify' it again. 2. The way into the holy of holies or to eternal ' happiness is laid as open as may be by Christ, injiis_ doctrine, life, and death : in all which we may see with open face what human nature may "attain to", and how it may by humility, self-denial, divine love, and a Christ-like life, rise above *all visible heavens into a state of immortal glory and bliss. 3. Here is a manifestation of lovejjiven, enough to thaw all the icyness of men's hearts which self- love had quite frozen up : for here is one who, in human nature most heartUy every where denying himself, is ready to do any thing for the good of mankind, and at last gives up his life for the same purpose ; and that according to the good will and pleasure of that eternal love which " so loved the world, that he gave" this beloved and " his only begotton Son, that whosoever believeth in him, should not perish, but have everlasting life."* 4. Whereas every penitent sinner carries a sense of guilt upon his. own conscience, is apt to shrink * John iii. 16. EVANGELICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 373 with cold chUl fears of offended majesty, and to dread the thoughts of violated justice : he is as sured that Christ hath laid down his Hfe, and thereby made propitiation and atonement for sin ; that he hath laid down his life for the redemption of him ; and so in Christ " we have redemption through his blood, even the forgiveness of sins."* Thus may the hearts of all penitents, troubled at first with a sense of their own guilt, be quieted, and] fully estabhshed in a living faith and hope in anj eternal goodness ; seeing how their sins are remitted ' through the blood of Jesus who came to die for them and save them, and through his blood they may have free access unto God. 5. Seeing sin and guilt are apt continually to be get a jealousy of God's majesty and greatness, from whom the sinner finds himself at a vast distance, he is made acquainted with a mediator, through whom he may address himself to God, without this jea lousy or doubting ; for that this mediator likewise is one of human nature, that is highly beloved and accepted of God, he having so highly pleased God by performing his will in all things. Certainly it is very decorous and much for the ease of a peni tent's mind, (as it makes also for the disparagement of sin) that our addresses to God should be through a mediator. The Platonists wisely observed that between the pure, Divinity and impure sinners as there is no union, so no communion : it is very agreeable every way and upon all accounts, that they who in themselves are altogether unworthy and under demerit, should come to God by a mediator. * Eph. i. 7. } 374 OF LEGAL RIGHTEOUSNESS, &C. Thus the Scripture every where seems to repre sent and hold forth Christ in the forenamed parti culars, without descending into niceties and subtil ties, such as the schoolmen and others from them have troubled the world with, in a very full and ample manner, that so the minds of true believers, that are willing to comply with the purpose of God for their own eternal peace, might in aU cases find something in Christ for their relief, and make use of him, as much as may be, to encourage and help j on godliness : for by this whole undertaking of Christ manifested in the gospel, God would have to be understood full relief of mind and ease of con- i science, as also all encouragement to godliness, and disparagement of sin. AnU indeed the whole bu siness of Christ is the greatest blow tovmTHatmay be ; for the world is taught hereby, that there is no, sinning upon cheap and easy, terms : men may see 'ill Willi 1 HI ¦ ¦¦_! ¦ i ¦ rf.£^— — ^»*tf"-W^ J that ' laod will not return so easily into favour with sinners ; but he will have his righteousness acknow ledged, and likewise their own demerit. And this acknowledgment he is once indeed pleased to ac cept of in the person of our Saviour : yet if men will not now turn to him, and accept his favour, they must know that there is no other sacrifice for sin. By these particulars upon which we have briefly touched, to name no more, it may appear, that when we look into the gospel, we are taught to be lieve that Christ hath done, according to the good pleasure of God, every thing for us that may truly relieve our minds, and encourage us to godhness, jl godlike righteousness far exceeding the righteous ness of the Scribes and Pharisees. A DISCOVERY OF THE SHORTNESS AND VANITY OF A PHARISAICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS; AN ACCOUNT OF THE FALSE GROUNDS UPON WHICH MEN ARE APT VAINLY TO CONCEIT THEM SELVES TO BE RIGHTEOUS. And he said unto the Pharisees, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men ; but God knoweth your hearts : for that which is highly esteemed amongst men, is abomination in the sight of God. Luke xvi. IS. TIccf o Ixutov xtfatpyms xaSagov, eixuSag bet- 390 THE VANITY OF A ter decorum : but its main business is to purge and reform our hearts and all the illicit actions and mo tions thereof. And so I come to a third particular wherein we are apt to misjudge ourselves in matters of religion. CHAP. IV. The third mistake about religion, viz. A constrained and forced obedience to God's commandments. The religion of many (some qf whom would seem most abhorrent from superstition) is nothing else but superstition properly so called. False religionists, having no inward sense qf the divine goodness, cannot truly love God, yet their sour and dreadful apprehensions of God compel them to serve him. A slavish spirit in religion may be very pro digal in such kind qf serving God as doth not pinch their cor ruptions ; but in the great and weightier matters qf religion, in such things as prejudice their beloved lusts, it is very needy and sparing. This servile spirit has low and mean thoughts of God, but a high opinion of its outward services, as conceiting that by such cheap things God is gratified and becomes indebted to it. The different effects of love and slavish fear in the truly, and in the falsely, religious. 3. ANOTHER particular wherein men mistake religion, is, A constrained and forced obedience lo God's commandments. That which many men (amongst whom some would seem to be most ab horrent from superstition) call their religion, is in deed nothing else but a ds/ff/da/^oe/a,* that I may use the word in its ancient and proper sense, as it * See the Tract of Superstition. PHARISAICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 391 imports ' such an apprehension of God as renders him grievous to men, and so destroys all free and cheerful converse with him, and begets instead thereof a forced and dry devotion, void of inward Hfe and love.' Those servile spirits which are not acquainted with God and his goodness, may be so haunted by the frightful thoughts of a Deity, as to scare and terrify them into some worship and ob servance of him. They are apt to look upon him as one clothed with austerity, or, as the Epicurean poet hath too truly painted out their thoughts, as a savus dominus, that is, in the language of the unpro fitable servant in the gospel, " a hard master ;" and therefore they think something must be done to please him, and to mitigate his severity towards them : and though they cannot truly love him, having no inward sense of his loveliness, yet they cannot but serve him so far as these rigorous ap prehensions lie upon them ; though notwithstand ing such as these are very apt to persuade them selves that they may pacify him and purchase his favour with some cheap services, as if heaven itself could become guilty of bribery, and an immutable justice be flattered into partiality and respect of persons. Because they are not acquainted with God, and know him not as he is in himself, there fore they are ready to paint him forth to themselves in their own shape : and because they themselves are fuU of peevishness and seU-wiU, arbitrarUy im posing and prescribing to others without sufficient evidence of reason, and are easily enticed by flat teries ; they are apt to represent the Divinity also to themselves in the same form, and think they view the true portraiture and draught of their own 392 THE VANITY OF A genius in it ; and therefore, that they might please this angry deity of their own making, they care not sometimes to be lavish in such a kind of ser vice of him as doth not much pinch their own cor ruptions ; nay, and it may be too, will seem to part with them sometimes, and give them a weeping farewell, if God and their own awakened con sciences seem to frown upon them ; though all their obedience arise from nothing else but the compulsions and necessities which their own sour and dreadful apprehensions of God lay upon them : and therefore in those things which more nearly touch their own beloved lusts, they will be as s*cant and sparing as may be ; here they will be as strict with God as may be, that he may have no more than his due, as they think, like that unprofitable servant in the gospel, that, be cause his master was " an austere man, reaping where he had not sown, and gathering where he had not scattered,"* was content and willing he should have his own again, but would not suffer him to have any more. This servUe spirit in religion is always illiberal and needy in the magnolia legis, the great and weightier matters of religion, and here weighs out obedience by drachms and scruples : it never finds itself more shriveUed and shrunk up, than when it is to converse with God; Hke those creatures that are generated of slime and mud, the more the summer sun shines upon them, and the nearer it comes to them, the more is aU their vital strength dried up and spent away : their dreadful thoughts * Matt. xxv. 24. PHARISAICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 393 of God, like a cold eastern wind, blasts all their blossoming affections, and nips them in the bud : these exhaust their native vigour, and make them weak and sluggish in all their motions toward God. Their religion is rather a prison or a piece of penance to them, than any voluntary and free com pliance of then' souls with the divine will : and yet because they bear the burden and heat of the day, they think, when the evening comes, they ought to be more Hberally rewarded ; such slavish spirits being ever apt inwardly to conceit that heaven re ceives some emolument or other by their hard la bours, and so becomes indebted to them, because they see no true gain and comfort accruing from them to their own souls ; and so because they do God's work and not their own, they think they may reasonably expect a fair compensation, as having been profitable to him. And this, I doubt, was the first and vulgar foundation of merit: though now the world is ashamed to own it. But alas, such an ungodlike religion as this can never be owned by God : the bond- woman and her son must be cast out. The spirit of true religion is of a more free, noble, ingenuous, and generous | nature, arising out of the warm beams of the di vine love which first hatched it and brought it forth, and therefore is it afterwards perpetually bathing itself in that sweetest love that first begot it, and is always refreshed and nourished by it. This " love casteth out fear, fear which hath torment in it,"* and is therefore more apt to chase away souls once wounded with it from God, rather than allure them * 1 John iv. 18. 3D 394 THE VANITY OF A to God. Such fear of God always carries in " it a secret antipathy against him, as being "Kut^oii kcu fikoLfizepv, as Plutarch speaks, ' one that is so trou blesome, that there is no quiet or peaceable living with him.' Whereas love, by a strong sympathy, draws the souls of men, when it hath once laid hold upon them by its powerful insinuation, into the near est conjunction that may be with the Divinity ; it thaws all those frozen affections which a slavish fear had congealed and locked up, and makes the soul most cheerful, free, and nobly resolved in all its motions after God. It was well observed of old by Pythagoras, (isXriaroi yivo^s^a -rgoj rods Ssovg fiaoiZovrig, ' we are never so well as when we ap proach to God ;' when, in a way of religion, we make our addresses to God, then are our souls most cheerful. True religion and an inward acquaint ance with God, discovers nothing in him but pure and sincere goodness, nothing that might breed the least distaste or disaffection, or carry in it -any semblance of displeasingness ; and therefore the souls of good men are never pinching and sparing in their affections : theft the torrent is most full and swells highest, when it empties itself into this unbounded ocean of the Divine Being. This makes all the commandments of God light and easy, and far from being grievous. There needs no law to compel a mind, acted by the w^e spirit of divine love, to serve God or to comply wifctChis will.* It is'the choice" of such a soul to endeavour to con form itself to him, and draw from him, as much as may be, an imitation of that goodness and per- * Quis legem det amantibus? major lex amor est sibi. Boetius, Lib. III. de Consol. Philos. 4 PHARISAICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 395 fection which it finds in him. Such a Christian does not therefore obey his commands only because it is God's will he should do so, but because he sees the law of God to be truly perfect, as David speaks :* his nature being reconciled to God, finds it all " holy, just, and good,"t as St. Paul speaks, and such a thing as his soul loves, " sweeter than the honey or the honey-comb ;" and he makes it " his meat and drink to do the will of God," as our Lord and Saviour did. And so I pass to the fourth and last particular, wherein religion is some times mistaken. CHAP. V. The fourth and last mistake about religion, When a mere me chanical and artificial reUgion is taken for that which is a true impression qf heaven upon the souls qf men, and which moves like a new nature. How reUgion is by some made a piece qf art, and how there may be specious and plausible imitations of the internals of religion as well as of' the externals. The method and power qf fancy in contriving such artificial imita tions. How apt men are in these to deceive both themselves and others. The difference between those that are governed in their religion by fancy, and those that are actuated by the divine" Spirit and in wliom religion is a living form. That true reli gion is no art, but a new nature. Religion discovers itself best in a serene and clmr temper of mind, in deep humility, meek ness, self-denial, universal love qf God and all true goodness. JL HE fourth and last particular wherein men mis judge themselves, is, When a mere mechanical and * Psal. xix. 7. f Rom. vii. 12. // 394> THE VANITY OF A to God. Such fear of God always carries in ' it a secret antipathy against him, as being Xinnjgov kui j8Xa|8sgoV, as Plutarch speaks, ' one that is so trou blesome, that there is no quiet or peaceable living with him.' Whereas love, by a strong sympathy, draws the souls of men, when it hath once laid hold upon them by its powerful insinuation, into the near est conjunction that may be with the Divinity ; it thaws all those frozen affections which a slavish fear had congealed and locked up, and makes the soul most cheerful, free, and nobly resolved in all its motions after God. It was well observed of old by Pythagoras, (Z'sXriaroi yivofjus^a irgbg roug Ssoug (ZadlZpprsg, ' we are never so well as when we ap proach to God ;' when, in a way of religion, we make our addresses to God, then are our souls most cheerful. True religion and an inward acquaint ance with God, discovers nothing in him but pure and sincere goodness, nothing that might breed the least distaste or disaffection, or carry in it any semblance of displeasingness ; and therefore the souls of good men are never pinching and sparing in their affections : theft the torrent is most full and swells highest, when rt empties itself into this unbounded ocean of the Divine Being. This makes all the commandments of God Hght and easy, and far from being grievous. There needs no law to compel a mind, acted by the vtaajLe spirit of divine love, to serve God or to comply wTttCjiis will.* It is the choice of such a soul to endeavour to con form itself to him, and draw from him, as much as may be, an imitation of that goodness and per- * Quis legem det amantibus ? major lex amor est sibi. Boetius, Lib. III. de Consol. Philos. 4 PHARISAICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 395 fection which it finds in him. Such a Christian. does not therefore obey his commands only because it is God's will he should do so, but because he sees the law of God to be truly perfect, as David speaks :* his nature being reconciled to God, finds j it all " holy, just, and good,"t as St. Paul speaks, I and such a thing as his soul loves, " sweeter than! the honey or the honey-comb ;" and he makes it\ " his meat and drink to do the will of God," as \ our Lord and Saviour did. And so I pass to the \ fourth and last particular, wherein religion is some- | times mistaken. CHAP. V. The fourth and last mistake about religion, When a mere me chanical and artificial reUgion is taken for that which is a true impression qf heaven upon ihe souls qf men, and which moves like a new nature. How religion is by some made a piece qf art, and how there may be specious and plausible imitatitms of the internals qf religion as well as qf' the externals. The method and power qf fancy in contriving such artificial imita tions. How apt men are in these to deceive both themselves and others. The difference between those that are governed in their religion by fancy, and those that ar$ actuated by the divini Spirit and in whom religion is a living form. That true reli gion is no art, but a new nature. Religion discovers itself best in a serene and clear temper of mind, in deep humility, meek ness, self-denial, universal love qf God and all true goodness. X HE fourth and last particular wherein men mis judge themselves, is, When a mere mechanical and * Psal. xix. 7. f Rwn- vii. 12. // 396' THE VANITY OF A i I artificial religion is taken for that which is a true im-r ' pression of heaven jupozLtte- souls of \menx and which moves like an inward nature. True religion will not stoop to rules of art, nor be confined within the narrow compass thereof: no, where it is, we may cry out with the Greek philosopher, Itrrt rig ®zog hdov God hath there kindled, as it were, his own life, which will move and act only according to the laws of heaven. But there are some mechanical Chris-;^ tians that can frame and fashion out religion so cunningly in their own souls, by that book-skill they have got of it, that it may many times deceive themselves, as if it were a true living thing. We often hear that mere pretenders to religion may go as far in all the external acts of it, as those that are best acquainted with it : I doubt not also but many times there may be artificial imitations drawn of that which only Hves in the souls of good men, by the powerful and wily magic of exalted fancies ; as we read of some artificers that have made such im ages of living creatures, wherein they have not only drawn forth the outward shape, but seem almost to have copied out the life also in them. Men may make an imitation as well of those things which we call the internals of religion, as of the externals. There may be a semblance of inward joy in God, of love to him and his precepts, of dependance upon him, and a filial reverence of him ; which by the contrivance and power of fancy may be repre sented in a masque upon the stage of the animal \ part of a man's soul. Those Christians that fetch all their religion from pious books and discourses, hearing of such and such signs of grace and evi dences of salvation, and being taught to believe PHARISAICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 397 they must get those, that so they may go to hea ven ; may presently begin to set themselves to work, and in an apish imitation cause their animal powers and passions to represent all these; and fancy being weU acquainted with all those several affections in the soul, that at any time express themselves towards outward things, may, by the power it hath over the passions, call them all forth in the same mode and fashion, and then conjoin with them some thoughts of God and divine things, which may serve, thus put together, for a hand some artifice ofj'eligion, wherein these mechanics riiay much applaud themselves. I doubt not but there may be such, who, to gain credit with themselves, and that glorious name of being the chUdren of God, though they know nothing more of it but that it is a title that sounds well, would use their best skUl to appear such to themselves, so qualified and moulded as they are told they must be. And as many times credit and reputation among men may make them polish the ruggedness of their outward man ; so to gain their own good opinion, and a reputation with their own consciences which look more inwardly, they may also endeavour to make their inward man look at sometimes more smooth and comely : and it is no hard matter for such chameleon-like Chris tians to turn even their insides into whatsoever hue and colour shall best please them, and then, Nar cissus-like, to faU in love with themselves : a strong and nimble fancy having such command over the animal spirits, that it can send them forth in full troops which way soever it pleaseth, and by their aid call forth and raise any kind of passion it Hsteth, 398 THE VANITY Of A and when it Hsteth allay it again, as the poets say iEolus Can do with the winds. As they say of the force of imagination, that vis imaginativa signat fcetum ; so imagination may stamp any idea that it finds within itself upon the passions, and turn them as it pleases to what seal it will set upon them, and mould them into any likeness ; and a man looking down and taking a view ofthe plot, as it is acted upon the stage of the animal powers, may like and approve it as a true platform of religion. Thus may they easily deceive themselves, and think their religion to be some mighty, thing within them, that runs quite through them, and makes all these trans formations within them ; whereas the rise and mo tion of it may be all in the animal and sensitive powers of the soul ; and a wise observer of it may see whence it comes and whither it goes : it being indeed a thing which is " from the earth, earthy," and not like that true spirit of regeneration which comes from heaven, and begets a divine life in the . souls of good men, and is not under the command of any such charms as these are, neither will it move according to those laws, and times, and mea sures, that we please to set to it : but we shall find it manifesting its mighty supremacy over the high est powers of our souls. Whereas we may truly say of all mechanics in religion, and our mimical Christians, that they are not so much actuated and informed by their religion, as they inform that ; the power of their own imagination deriving that force to it which bears it up, and guides all its motions and operations. And therefore they themselves having the power over it, can new mould it as themselves please, according to any new pattern PHARISAICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 399 which shall Hke them better than the former : they can furnish this domestic scene of theirs with any kind of matter which the history of other men's religion may afford them ; and if need be, act over all the experiences of that sect of men to which they most addict themselves, so to the life, that they may seem to themselves as well experienced Christians as any others ; and so, it may be, soar so aloft in self-conceit, as if they had already made their nests amongst the stars, and had viewed their own mansion in heaven. What was observed by the stoic concerning the vulgar sort of men, o fiiog vTokri-^ig, may as truly be said of this sort of Chris tians, their life is nothing else but a strong energy of fancy and opinion. But besides, lest their religion might too grossly discover itself to be nothing else but a piece of art, there may be sometimes such extraordinary motions stirred up within them, which may prevent all their own thoughts, that they may seem to be a true operation of the divine life ; when yet all this is nothing else but the energy of their own self-love, touched with some fleshly apprehensions of divine things, and excited by them. There are such things in our Christian religion that, when a carnal and unhaUowed mind takes the chair and gets the ex pounding of them, may seem very delicious to the fleshly appetites of men : some doctrines and notions of free grace and justification ; the magnificent titles of sons of God and heirs of heaven ; ever-flowing streams of joy and pleasure in which blessed souls shall swim to all eternity ; a glorious paradise in the world to come, always springing up with well- scented and fragrant beauties ; a. New Jerusalem 400 THE VANITY OF A paved with gold and bespangled with stars, com prehending in its vast circuit such numberless va rieties, that a busy curiosity may spend itself about to all eternity. I doubt not but that sometimes the most fleshly and earthly men, that fly their ambi tion to the pomp of this world, may be so ravished with the conceits of such things as these, that they may seem to be made partakers of " the powers of the world to come ;"* I doubt not but that they may be as much exalted with them, as the souls of crazed and distracted persons seem to be some times, when their fancies play with those quick and nimble spirits which a distempered frame of body, and unnatural heat in their heads beget within them. Thus may these blazing comets rise up above the moon, and climb higher than the sun ; which yet, because they have no solid consistency of their own, and are of a base and earthly ally, will soon vanish and fall down again, being only borne up by an external force. They may seem to themselves to have attained higher than those noble Christians that are gently moved by the natural force of true goodness ; they may seem to be ple- niores Deo than those that are really informed and actuated by the divine Spirit, and do. move on steadily and constantly in the way towards heaven ; as the seed that was sown in the thorny ground, grew up and lengthened out its blade faster than that which was sown in the good and fruitful soil. And as the motions of our sense, fancy, and pas sions, whUe our souls are in this mortal condition sunk down deeply into the body, are many times * Heb. vi. 5. PHARISAICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. 401 more vigorous and make stronger impressions upon us than those of the higher powers of the soul, which are more subtUe and remote from these mixt and animal perceptions; that devotion which is there seated may seem to have more energy and life in it than. that which gently, and with a more dehcate kind of touch, spreads itself upon the un derstanding, and from thence mUdly derives itself through our wills and affections. But howsoever the forrner may be more boisterous for a time, yet this is of a more consistent, spermatical, and thriv ing nature : for that proceeding indeed from no thing else but a sensual and fleshly apprehension of God and true happiness, is but of a flitting and fading nature ; and as the sensible powers and fa culties grow more languid, or the sun of divine light shines more brightly upon us, these earthly devotions Hke our culinary fires wiU abate their heat and fervour. But a true celestial warmth wUl \ never be extinguished, because it is of an immortal I nature ; and being once seated vitally in the souls of men, it wUl regulate and order all the motions of'it in a due manner, as the natural heat radicated in the hearts of living creatures hath the dominion and economy ofthe whole body under it, and sends forth warm blood and spirits and vital nourishment to every part and member of it. True religion is no piece of artifice ; it is no boiling up of our ima ginative powers, nor the glowing heats of passion ; though these are too often mistaken for it, when in our jugglings in religion we cast a mist before our own eyes : but it is a Jiew nature informing the souls of men ; it is a godlike frame of spirit, dis covering itself most of all in serene and clear minds, 3 E 402 VANITY OF PHARISAICAL RIGHTEOUSNESS. in deep humUity, meekness, self-denial, universal Ipve of God and aU true goodness, without partial ity and without hypocrisy ; whereby we are taught to know God, and knowing him to love him, and conform ourselves, as much as may be, to aU that perfection which shines forth in him. THE EXCELLENCY AND NOBLENESS TRUE RELIGION, 1, IN ITS RISE AND ORIGINAL. 2. IN ITS NATURE AND ESSENCE. 3. IN ITS PROPERTIES AND OPERATIONS. 4. IN ITS PROGRESS. 5. IN ITS TERM AND END. To the saints that are in the earth, and to the excellent, in whom is all my delight. Psal. xvi. 3. Ehy'tnia. }i vi rrii * uxovos rfiffTtffts, xai q it^s to o^itvitov V^ofioiumi, «'v ip. lyei^trai Xoyos kcu apiril. Greg. Naziahzknus in Oral 11. Eii-yivzta.ii di Xiyu, oux $v ol -rnXXai vop.i£euiriv. avTuyi. aAX' iit lUffifitiK- %itpux~ Trillion xoii vpo-xos, xou n yroos • 3L H Gen- "• 7- 3 F 410 . THE EXCELLENCY AND of Gideon's brethren, " As he is, so are they (ac cording to their capacity,) each one resembling the chUdren of a king."* Titles of worldly honour in heaven's heraldry are but only tituli nominates ; but titles of divine dignity signify some real thing, some real and divine communications to the spirits and minds of men. All perfections and excellen cies in any kind are to be measured by their ap proach to that primitive perfection of all, God him self; and therefore participationof the divine nature cannot but entitle a Christian to the highest degree of dignity : " Behold what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God."t Thus much for a more general discovery of the nobleness of religion as to its fountain and original : we may further and more particularly take notice of this in reference to that twofold fountain in God, from whence all true religion flows and issues forth, viz. 1. His immutable nature. 2. His. will. 1. The immutable nature qf God. From thence arise all those eternal rules of truth and goodness which are the foundation of all religion, and which God at the first creation folded up in the soul of man. These we may call the truths of natural in scription ; understanding hereby either thosTTuri- damental principles of truth which reason by a naked intuition may behold in God, or those ne cessary corollaries and deductions that may be drawn from thence. I cannot think it so proper to say, that God ought infinitely to be loved because he commands it, as because he is indeed an infinite and unchangeable goodness. God_hath stamped a • Judges viii. 18. f 1 John iii. 1. NOBLENESS OF TRUE RELIGION. 411 copy of his own archetypal loveliness upon the soul, that man by reflecting into himself might be hold there the glory of God, intra se videre Deum, see within his soul all those ideas of truth which concern the nature and essence of God, by rea son of its own resemblance of God ; and so beget within himself the most free and generous motions of love to God. Reason in man being lumen de lumine, a light flowing from the fountain and Father of lights, and being, as TuUy phraseth it, participa- ta similitudo rationis aiterna? (as the law of nature, the ko^o? ygavrog, the law written in man's heart, is participatio legis xiernw in rationali creatura) it was to enable man to work out of himself aU those no tions of God which are the true groundwork of love and obedience to God, and conformity to him : and in moulding the inward man into the greatest conformity to the nature of God was the perfection and efficacy of the religion of nature. But since man's fall from God, tbe inward virtue and vigour of reason is much abated, the soul having suffered a vrsgoppOwig, as Plato speaks, a defluvium pennarum : those principles of divine truth which were first engraven upon man's heart with the finger of God, are now, as the characters of some ancient monu ments, less clear and legible than at first. And therefore, besides the truth of natural inscription, / 2. God hath provided tbe truth of divine reve lation, which issues forth from hisTowif free will, and clearly discovers the way of our return to God, from whom we are fallen. And this truth, with the effects and productions of it in the minds of men, the Scripture is wont to set forth under the name of j^race? as proceeding merely from the free 412 THE EXCELLENCY AND bounty and overflowings of the divine love. Of this revealed will is that of the apostle to be under stood, ra rou ©sou obhig oifcv, " None hath known the things of God ;"* outeg, none, neither angel nor man, could know the mind of God, could unlock the breast of God, or search out the counsels of his will. But God, out -of the infinite riches of his compassions toward mankind, is pleased to unbosom his secrets, and most clearly to manifest " the way into the holiest of all,"t and " bring to light life and immortality,"! and in these last ages to send his Son, who lay in his bosom from all eternity, to teach us his will, and declare his mind to us, When we " look unto the earth, then behold dark ness and dimness of anguish," || that I may use those words of the prophet Isaiah. But when we look towards heaven, then behold light break ing forth upon us, like the eyelids of the morning, ¦; and spreading its wings over the horizon of man- 1 kind sitting in darkness and the shadow of death, \ " to guide our feet into the way of peace." § But besides this outward revelation of God's will to men, there is also an inward iinpression_of it on their minds and spirits, which is in a more special manner attributed to God. We cannot see divine things but in a divine light : God^onTyTwho is the true light, and in whom there is no darkness at all, can so shine out of himself upon our glassy under standings, as to beget in them a picture of himself, his own will and pleasure, and turn the soul, as the phrase is in Job xxxviii. 14. DJlin "lOrD like wax or " clay to the seal" of his own light and love. * 1 Cor. ii. 11. f Heb. ix. 5. f 2 Tim. i. 10. || Isa. viii. 22. § Luke i. 79. NOBLENESS OF TRUE RELIGION. 413 Hejhat made our souls in his own image and like- j J ness, can easily find a way into them. The word \ ! tHatGod speaks, having found a way into the soul, imprints itself there as with the point of a diamond, and becomes "koyog \yyiyga\h\hivog \v rri rou i^a,v^ta,vov- rog -^vyy, that 1 may borrow Plato's expression. Men may__teacli_ the grammar and rhetoric, but II God teaches the divinity. Thus it is God alone ' ' that acquaints the soul with the truths of revela tion : and he it is also that does strengthen and raise the soul to better apprehensions even of natu ral truth : ' God being that in the intellectual world ' which the sun is in the .sensible,' (oVsg h rotg uh^rdie 6 ijXtog, rouro h roig voqroTg - 6 &iog) as some of the ancient fathers love to speak, and the ancient philosophers too, who meant God by their intel lectus agens, whose proper work they supposed to be not so much to enlighten the object, as the fa culty. CHAP. II. 2. The nobleness qf religion in respect of its nature, briefly dis covered in some particulars. How a man actuated by religion, 1. Lives above the world; 2. Converses with himself, and knows how to love, value, and reverence himself, in the best sense ; 3. Lives above himself, not being content to enjoy himself, except he may enjoy God too, and himself in God. How he denies himself for God. To deny a man's self, is not to deny right reason, for that were to deny God, instead qf denying himself for God. Self-love the only principle that acts wicked men. The happy privileges of a soul united to God. 2. W E have done with the first head, and come now to discourse with the like brevity on another, 414 THE EXCELLENCY OF (our purpose being to insist most upon the third particular, viz. The nobleness qf religion in its pro perties, after we have handled the second) which is Tke excellency and nobleness qf religion in regard of its nature, whether it be taken in abstracto or in concreto ; which we shall treat promiscuously, with out any rigid tying of ourselves to exact rules of art : and so we shall glance at it in these foUowing notions, rising as it were step by step. 1. A good man, that is actuated by religion, lives above the world and all mundane delights and excel lencies. The soul is a more vigorous and puissant thing, when it is once restored to the possession of its own being, than to be bounded within the nar row sphere of mortality, or to be straightened with in the narrow prison of sensual and corporeal de lights ; but it will break forth with the greatest ve hemency, and ascend upwards towards immortality : and when it converses more intimately with reli gion, it can scarce look back upon its own con verses, though in a lawful way, with earthly things, without being touched with a holy shamefaced- ness and a modest blushing; and, as Porphyry speaks of Plotinus, laxsi [th ala^vo^vw ort h dupuri iir\, ' it seems to be ashamed that it should be in the body.' It is true religion only that teaches and enables men to die to this world and to all earthly things, and to rise above that vaporous sphere of sen sual and earthly pleasures, which darken the mind and hinder it from enjoying the brightness of divine light ; the proper motion of religion is still upwards to its first original. Whereas, on the contrary, the souls of wicked men uxofiguxioti auuiTe^i[/,arog, as Simplicius speaks, to mind the preserving of its own dignity and glory.' To conclude this parti cular, a good man endeavours to walk by eternal and unchangeable rules of reason ; reason in a good man sits in the throne, and governs all the powers of his soul in a sweet harmony and agreement with itself: whereas wicked men live only tyrjv oo%a