S.'Ba^e-. l£>£2>b HOW THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE GOSPEL IS ETEKNAL LIFE. A SERMON PEEAOHET) IN THE " u itun IN RECOMMENDATION OV THE Jjettowsftip 4un^ Jftetoiaind fog tfa djjmigiHgation, ON THE MOBNING- OB THE ANNUAL MEETING, JANUARY 12th, 1868: BY SAMUEL BACHE, Minister ov the Congeegation. BIEMINGHAM: PEINTED BY EICHAED L. GREW, 27, TEMPLE EOW. HOW THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE GOSPEL IS ETERNAL LIFE. A SERMON PREACHED IN THE tfiftttt in recommendation or the (dftftoutsfttp 4uttd JRsUrfainwl &g the dljmtjpHgBtimr, ON THE MORNING OP THE ANNUAL MEETING, JANUARY 12th, 1868 BY SAMUEL BACHE, Minister oe the Congregation. BIEMINGHAM: PEINTED BY EICHAED L. GEEW, 27, TEMPLE EOW. PREFACE Having expressed a desire to place in the hands of each member of my Congregation a record of my distinctive opinions, and thuse of my illustrious predecessor Dr. Priestley, with reference to doctrines which I hold most dear, and which are set forth in the following Discourse, a few friends have requested me to publish it. I very willingly accede to their request, and gladly avail myself of the opportunity of giving a brief notice of the practical application of our Fellowship Fund in the maintenance of those doctrines. This Fellowship Fund, established in our Congregation full fifty years ago, is intended for the aid of poor Unitarian Con gregations in the repair of their places of worship and school buildings and in the maintenance of their worship. It is raised. by small subscriptions of one shilling per quarter and upwards, and is disbursed by a Committee elected by the Subscribers, who receive applications and investigate cases. Very valuable assistance is rendered by this benevolent Association. Each year brings many new applications ; and many are the instances in which seasonable relief has encouraged the energy and raised the drooping spirits of needy Congregations. Our Fellowship Fund thus becomes a very valuable agency for enabling us, after the example of our Divine Master, to " bear witness to the truth ; " and it is therefore hoped that the list of Subscribers, which falls far short of the number of worshippers in the Church of the Messiah, may be largely increased, and wider powers of usefulness thus accorded to the Committee. Subscriptions are received by the Treasurer of the Church with the Seat Bents, and he will gladly include new names in the list of Subscribers. The references to Dr. Priestley's Works in the following Discourse are to the edition of them in 25 volumes, by J. T. Eutt, published in 1831. John xvn., 3.—" This is life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent." As we shall hold immediately after this present service the Annual Meeting of a Society established half a century ago for the express purpose of the maintenance and diffusion of Unitarian Christianity, I request your attention now to this most solemn and explicit declaration by our divinely appointed Teacher and Lord of the fundamental principle on which it distinctively rests. That declaration occurs in the prayer of Jesus Christ himself to his Father on behalf of his followers immediately before his crucifixion. The prayer is prompted and sustained throughout by an immediate and earnest regard to the most impor tant fact connected with the destiny of man ; that by the knowledge of which he can alone obtain correct views of his present relations and duties, can alone acquaint himself with the highest and purest motives to virtue, the fact which it is the peculiar purpose of Christianity to attest of man's immortality. The gospel of Jesus is adapted to the requirements of the spirit within us in no respect more admirably than in this, that it maintains throughout an explicit reference to this momentous truth, shows us its constant bearing on the life that now is, and enables us to improve our present season of discipline by continually reminding us of the glorious purpose which it is intended to effect, and of the manner in which that purpose may be successfully accomplished. In this declaration of Jesus he distinctly sets before us the basis on which his constant and reverential and urgent recognition of that eternal life which awaits us actually rests. Let us endeavour clearly and completely to learn the real nature of this basis of all rational and firm and un wavering faith in our immortal destiny. It presents to us three distinct but intimately and indissolubly connected topics, to each of which I will briefly ask your attention. It teaches us — first, that the Father is the only true God; secondly, that Jesus, His messenger, is the Christ ; and, thirdly, that in the knowledge of these momentous truths standeth our eternal life. First : The Father is the only true God. The gospel throughout assumes the fundamental Jewish doctrine of the absolute unity of God ; monotheism in opposition to and in contrast with polytheism. In ancient times polytheism was naturally and unavoidably the common sense of mankind if they entertained any belief in superhuman existences and powers at all. The dis courses of Socrates had relation to the providence of the Gods, not of God, and the philosophical enquiries of Cicero were into the nature of the Gods, not of God : because in those times men were unavoidably impressed with diversities and even seeming con trarieties of superhuman agency which the discoveries of modern science enable us to recognise as what they really are : — "All are but parts of one stupendous whole, " Whose body nature is, and God the soul." Pope's Essay on Man, I., 267 The monotheism, therefore, of the ancient Jews was clearly the result, not of scientific or philosophical enquiries, but of an express revelation : and its firm establishment among them as a nation in the time of David, (whose illustrious contemporary Homer has immortalised in his Hiad the polytheism which then prevailed throughout all the rest of the world,) is to my mind all but a mathematical demonstration of the substantial verity of the Pentateuch originating in the time of Moses, and based upon the realities of his history as the deliverer of the Israelites from Egypt. The distinction, however, between monotheism and polytheism is not the distinction between Unitarianism and Trinitarianism. Our Trinitarian brethren justly claim to be worshippers of only one God equally with ourselves : they are not consciously worshippers of more Gods than one. The distinctive difference on this point between them and ourselves arises from the application in very early times of the subtle metaphysics of the Platonic philosophy to the interpretation of the Christian records, with the view of conciliating the favour of the then predominant heathenism. Not until the year A.D. 325 was the doctrine of the Trinity established in its present form by the celebrated Council of Nicoea in Bithynia; established, that is, by ecclesiastical authority, by which alone it has since been predominantly maintained. From the very moment of its establishment, as well as prior to that event, it has been repudiated by many sincere Christians. Take the evidence of this fact afforded by Tertullian, the celebrated presbyter of Carthage, who flourished about A.D. 200. In his days the words Unitarian and Trinitarian derived from the Latin were represented by the correspondent Greek terms Monarchy (single and sole ruler) and Economy (family or household) . Employing these Greek terms, Tertullian writes, "The simple, the ignorant and unlearned, who "are always the greater part of the body of Christians, "since the rule of faith" — meaning, probably, the Apostles' Creed — "transfers the worship of many gods "to the one true God, not understanding that the "unity of God is to be maintained but with the "ceconomy, dread this oeconomy, imagining that this "number and disposition of a Trinity is a division of "the Unity. They, therefore, will have it that we are "worshippers of two and even of three Gods, but that "they are worshippers of one God only. We, they "say, hold the' monarchy. Even the Latins have "learned to bawl out for the monarchy, and the "Greeks themselves will not understand the oeconomy." (Priestley's Works, vol. vi., p. 486-7.) Neither do we Unitarians understand it or recognise it for the very reason for which it was rejected by the majority of these early Christians ; viz., that it was not recognised by Jesus Christ himself : for being himself, as the Son of God, one of the persons in that supposed oeconomy, he nevertheless prays as a man to his Father, and de clares that his Father is the only true God. He therefore does not claim to be himself God, but most effectually repudiates such an assumption. My illustrious predecessor, Dr. Priestley, from whose works I have copied the early Christian quotation which you have just heard, became fully impressed with a conviction of the truth and import ance of Unitarian Christianity by his study of the early Christian Fathers for his defence of the verity of our New Testament Scriptures against the deists and atheists of his age, and then by his reverent and conscientious study of that New Testament itself. Referring to his "Appeal to the serious and candid Professors of Christianity," first published in 1770, 8 (nearly a century ago), he writes as follows, what we his lineal successors in this Church of the Messiah shall do well attentively to consider. (Priestley* s Works, vol. ii., p. 413-416.) — "I shall conclude this 'address with a word of advice and exhortation to all 'Unitarians, whether they be members of the Estab- 'lished Church, or of any society of Dissenters in this 'country. Of such great importance is the doctrine 'of the Divine Unity, that nothing will more fully 'justify a separation from any Christian Church that 'does not openly profess it, and much more from those 'that avow the contrary doctrine, directing prayers 'and paying supreme worship to any other than 'the "God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ.' It was 'for the preservation of this great and fundamental 'doctrine, that Abraham, and his family by Isaac and 'Jacob, were separated from the rest of the world, 'and made a distinct people, as it were, to be the 'depositaries of the true religion, which consists 'principally in the sole worship of the one true and 'living God, the Maker and Preserver of all things. 'The same important doctrine was uniformly taught by 'Christ and the apostles; though Christians in after 'times, like the Israelites after the time of Joshua, 'relapsed into that idolatry which has generally pre- ' vailed to this day. If it was a sufficient justification 'of the first Reformers, that they considered the church 'from which they separated as worshipping saints and 'angels, will it not justify your separation from their 'partial reformations, that you consider them as pray- 'ing to and worshipping one whom you consider as a 'man like yourselves, though honoured and dis- 'tinguished by God above all other men ? To join 'habitually in public worship with Trinitarians, is 9 "countenancing that worship which you must consider "as idolatrous ; and which, however innocent in them, "is highly criminal in you. If they think it a point of "conscience not to go to mass in Popish countries, "because, in their opinion, it is idolizing a piece of "bread, you ought to make a point of conscience of "not worshipping with them, because, in your opinion, "it is idolizing a man, who is as much a creature of "God as a piece of bread, and just as improper an object "of worship. Besides, the great offence to Jews, "Mahometans, and the world at large, being the "doctrine of the Trinity, it is highly necessary that "societies of Christians should be formed expressly on "this principle of the Divine Unity, that it may be "evident to all the world, that there are Christians, "and societies of Christians, who hold the doctrine of "the Trinity in as much abhorrence as they themselves "can do. For the conversion of Jews or Mahometans "to Christianity while it is supposed to contain the "doctrine of the Trinity, no person who knows, or has "heard of Jews or Mahometans, can ever expect. "Assemble together, therefore, in the name and in the "fear of God, and according to the order of the gospel, "every Lord's-day ; if there be no more than two or "three, or even a single family of you in a place, read "the Scriptures and pray together. Be careful, how- "ever, to do this in the spirit of Christian charity, "which should be extended to all men, but especially "to all that bear the Christian name. Consider them "as men who are in an error which is always involun- "tary. Endeavour to remove the prejudices they "unhappily lie under, but forbear all angry reproaches, "all insult, and even ridicule ; for religion is a serious "thing, and brotherly love is the very essence of it. 10 f ' And if this love is to be extended even to enemies, "much more should it be indulged towards our merely "mistaken friends." How earnestly, and perseveringly, and efficiently the excellent Dr. Priestley carried out his avowal and maintenance of what he believed to be the tfuth of the gospel, and how nobly he endured the persecution which he had to encounter in consequence of it, should be well known to you all. It was not until the year 1813 that the professors of Unitarian Christianity were liberated by Act of Parliament from the severe penalties to which they had previously been liable ; and immediately they passed a Resolution, "That as "Unitarian Christians feared not to profess and in- "culcate what they esteem the doctrines of the Gospel, "though liable to the infliction of severe penalties, it is "their incumbent duty, now that they are placed "within the protection of the law, not to relax their "efforts, but rather to extend those exertions which well "consist with the peace and order of civil society and "the purest principles of Christian charity." (Monthly Repository, 1813, p. 746.) Immediately afterwards, therefore, originated the Fellowship Fund in connexion with our Congregation, whose Annual Meeting you are earnestly requested at the close of this service to attend. I trust that I have succeeded in showing you how faith ful and earnest and religious were the principles and sentiments on which it was at first established. To return now to the declaration of Jesus Christ in his prayer to his Father. We have clearly seen that he does not claim to be himself God. But does he make no claim for himself ? Yes : one very clear and important claim to the maintenance of which he sacrificed his life. Let us note — n Secondly : That in this his solemn prayer, 'he dis tinctly claims to have been immediately sent by God, and to be not merely one of God's special messengers, as were the other ancient prophets, but His Messiah too. This idea is clearly expressed in the several translations of the clause which different interpreters have given. Thus Campbell translates it, "Jesus the "Messiah, Thy apostle :" Archbishop Newcome, "him "whom Thou hast sent, even Jesus Christ :" Granville Penn in his New Covenant, "that Jesus whom Thou "hast sent is Christ :" Gilbert Wakefield's translation is, "that they might know Thee to be the only true "God, and Jesus, Thy messenger, to be the Christ." Accordingly the word Christian, both etymologically and historically, and in all but universal usage, denotes one who acknowledges Jesus to be the Christ. By those who did not acknowledge Jesus to be the Christ his disciples were therefore called not Christians but Nazarenes, and it was not until the faith of the Messiahship of Jesus prevailed in Antioch, or the Jew ish opposition to his claim was not there put forward, that the name Christian was first employed at all as the name of the disciples of Jesus of Nazareth. (Acts xi. 26.) Its essential and inseparable signification is the recognition of Jesus as the Christ : whoever dis avows this recognition may be to some extent a Nazarene, but is certainly no Christian. On behalf not only of Christ and his holy gospel, but of common sense, and natural reason, and true philosophy, I am constrained to resist and repudiate the tendency to deprive this term of its appropriate meaning as' con trary to all sound judgment and understanding, not less than to the actual claim and character of Christ and to his sacred divine authority. 12 Here then we have distinctly laid down the two grand and comprehensive truths, which it is the immediate and Sole purpose of our Unitarian Fellowship Fund, both theoretically and practically to maintain and extend. Let us see in conclusion — Thirdly : How the knowledge of these truths con stitutes our eternal life, how our eternal life stands in them. Eternal life may be considered in two dis tinct but connected senses : First, as the opposite of that temporal mortal life which is terminated by death, whereas eternal life is life without end : Secondly, as opposed to those worldly views and principles, to those sensual and selfish habits, to that worldly spirit, which the present life regarded, mainly by and for itself is apt to generate. The real and practical knowledge of God and of His Christ cherishes in every one who sincerely embraces it this eternal life by the following distinct and powerful agencies : First : Jesus Christ hath abolished death and brought life and immortality to light by his gospel and resurrection. " If Christ have not been raised from the dead," writes St. Paul to the Corinthians, (i. xv.) " then is our preaching vain and your faith " also is vain. Yea, and we are found false witnesses " of God, because we have testified of God that " he raised up Christ ; whom he raised not up, if " so be that the dead rise not at all. But in "truth Christ hath been raised from the dead, and " become the first fruits of them that slept." Paul, who was himself converted to Christianity, to which he had previously been a most violent opponent, by clear and indubitable evidence afforded to him as an upright and conscientious man, thus distinctly attests the fact of the resurrection of Jesus Christ as render- 13 ing eternal Ufe after death a definite and substantial object of faith and hope. Such it was not to the most enlightened and virtuous of the ancient heathen philosophers, nor such could it be without such testi mony to us now. One of the last things which Socrates said to his friends who attended upon him at the time of his death was, " I am going to die and you con- "tinue in life, but which of us shall be in a better state "is known to none but God." (Priestley's Works, vol. ii. p. 99.) Cicero writes to one of his friends, " If in "this I err, believing that the souls of men are immortal, "gladly I err, nor do I desire that this error in which I "rejoice should be wrested from me so long as I live." Well, therefore, writes Middleton in his Life of Cicero, " From this general view of Cicero's religion, one " cannot help observing that the most exalted state of " human reason is so far from superseding the use, that it " demonstrates the benefit of a more explicit revelation : "for though the natural law, in the perfection to " which it was carried by Cicero, might serve for a " sufficient guide to the few, such as himself, of enlarged " minds and happy dispositions, yet it had been so long "depraved and adulterated by the prevailing errors " and vices of mankind, that it was not discoverable, even "to those few, without great pains and study, and " could not produce in them, at last, anything more " than a hope, never a full persuasion ; whilst the " greatest part of mankind, even of the virtuous and "inquisitive, lived without the knowledge of a God, or " the expectation of a futurity ; and the multitude in " every country was left to the gross idolatry of the " popular worship. When we reflect on all this, we " must needs see abundant reason to be thankful to God "for the divme light of his Gospel; which has revealed 14 " at last, to babes, what was hidden from the wise; " and without the pains of searching or danger of mis- " taking, has given us not only the hope, but the " assurance, of happiness, and made us not only the "believers, but the heirs of immortality." (Priestley's Works, vol. ii., p. 100.) Thus does the knowledge of God as indeed our Father and of Jesus as the Christ constitute our eternal life by that confident assurance which it gives us, and which without it we could never have attained. Nor is even this all. Let us observe — Secondly : That Jesus as the Christ was sent to make known to us the will of God and our duty as supreme. The life that is to be ours after death is the divinely appointed prolongation, so far as our moral and spiritual consciousness are concerned, of the life which wenowlive in this world. We are here and now in the infancy of our being, be our earthly pilgrimage long or short ; and pre cisely as' in the earlier seasons of our mortal life on earth, we are instructed and educated for the improve ment and enjoyment of such as may follow here, so throughout the whole of our earthly sojourn we are in fact the pupils of Divine culture and education, for the improvement of which it is indispensable that we make the knowledge and performance of the Divine will our first and chief concern. " Ye cannot serve God and " mammon," said our Divinely appointed Teacher. We are bound to discover and to make a clear and practical distinction between them, and to serve God alone. Consequently our Redeemer and our Lord does not simply set before us this abstract proposition. But — Thirdly : Both by his precepts and his life, he takes us away from all sensual and selfish and mere worldly views, and teaches us that it is not the will of our Heavenly Father that we should live only for ourselves, 15 i.e., for the gratification of our own selfish desires. " If any man will come after me, let him deny himself " and take up his cross and follow me." (Matthew xvi. 24.) Accordingly this great practical lesson, as illustrated in the Ufe and in the voluntary sacrifice of Jesus Christ himself, was earnestly taught by his apostles generaUy, and especiaUy by St. Paul ; who, drawing out in detail the distinction which his Master had so emphaticaUy announced, writes to his Galatian Converts (v. 16.) " Walk in the Spirit and ye shaU not fulfil the the lust of the flesh." Thus Christian moraUty is an indispensable part of the Christian Ufe ; without it, we are the servants of mammon, i.e., of the flesh and of the world ; with it we become the servants of God, and practicaUy the disciples of His Son, Jesus Christ our Lord. FinaUy : Christ in his gospel and Ufe shows us the spirit of filial gratitude and reverence and love in which we should obey God. Though claiming for himself, as the Son of God, the honour with which men should honour his and our Father, (John v. 23), because he had been specially sent into the world as the revealer and representative of God to men, he no where claims, he no where accepts the worship which is due and which he him self paid to God the Father alone. When on a certain occasion some one addressed him in the words, " Good Master, what shaU I do that I may inherit eternal Ufe?" Jesus, apprehending no doubt that the expression " Good Master" was employed in somewhat of the spirit of flattery, repUed, " Why " caUest thou me good ? There is none good but one, "that is God." (Mark x. 17, 18.) And when, on another occasion, the Jews vindicated their having taken up stones to stone him by saying that they did 16 it " because thou, being a man, makest thyself God," Jesus asserted his right in conformity with the phraseo logy of their law to have adopted the name, but affirmed that what he had actually said was, " I am the Son of "God." (John x. 31—36.) Thus did he always himself maintain a devout reverence for his Heavenly Father as "the only true God," and thus did he most efficiently recommend it to others. May we, my brethren, thankfully accept and faithfully and diligently improve his gracious recommendation. May we recognise as distinctly and faithfully and perseveringly as he did the principles of God's moral government here as being precisely the same as those to which we shaU be subject hereafter. The practical recognition of these great and fundamental truths of the gospel of Christ, wul then give us an abiding and animating assurance of our eternal life, and all needful direction and aid towards the happy reaUsation of it. Without such recognition, we are really in the condition of the ancient heathen : " having no hope and without God in "the world." (Ephesians U., 12.) Such are distinctively the blessings which we derive from our Unitarian Christianity, and which it is our duty and privilege, by means of such agencies as that to which your attention and co-operation are now earnestly invited — (our Fellowship Fund) — both to maintain and to diffuse. May we thus approve our selves faithful as weU as enlightened advocates of the truth as it is in Jesus, extend the triumphs of his Kingdom on earth, and finaUy obtain his welcome to those mansions in his Father's House whither he is gone before to prepare a place for us ! Amen. Printed by Richard L. Grew, 27, Temple Row, Birmingham.