" YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY THE DIVINE GLORY MANIFESTED IN THE CONDUCT AND DISCOURSES OF OUR LORD. EIGHT SERMONS PREACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD, IN THE YEAR MDCCCXXXVL AT THE LECTURE FOUNDED BY THE LATE REV. JOHN BAMPTON, M. A. CANON OF SALISBURY. BY CHARLES A. OGILVIE, M.A. DOMESTIC CHAPLAIN TO HIS GRACE THE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY, AND LATE FELLOW OF BALLIOL COLLEGE. OXFORD, PRINTED BY S. COLLINGWOOD, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY, FOR THE AUTHOR. SOLD BY J. H. PARKER, OXFORD : AND BY J. G. AND F. R1VINGTON, LONDON. MDCCCXXXVI. TO THE REVEREND THE VICE-CHANCELLOR THE HEADS OF COLLEGES THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD THE FOLLOWING SERMONS PREACHED BY THEIR APPOINTMENT ARE RESPECTFULLY INSCRIBED. EXTRACT FROM THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF THE REV. JOHN BAMPTON, CANON OF SALISBURY. " I give and bequeath my Lands and Estates to " the Chancellor, Masters, and Scholars of the University " of Oxford for ever, to have and to hold all and sin- " gular the said Lands or Estates upon trust, and to the " intents and purposes hereinafter mentioned ; that is to " say, I will and appoint that the Vice-Chancellor of the " University of Oxford for the time being shall take and " receive all the rents, issues, and profits thereof, and " (after all taxes, reparations, and necessary deductions " made) that he pay all the remainder to the endowment " of eight Divinity Lecture Sermons, to be established for " ever in the said University, and to be performed in the " manner following : " I direct and appoint, that, upon the first Tuesday in " Easter Term, a Lecturer be yearly chosen by the Heads " of Colleges only, and by no others, in the room adjoin- " ing to the Printing-House, between the hours of ten in " the morning and two in the afternoon, to preach eight " Divinity Lecture Sermons, the year following, at St. " Mary's in Oxford, between the commencement of the " last month in Lent Term, and the end of the third week " in Act Term. a 2 vi EXTRACT FROM CANON BAMPTON'S WILL. " Also I direct and appoint, that the eight Divinity Lec- ' ture Sermons shall be preached upon either of the fol- ' lowing Subjects — to confirm and establish the Christian ' Faith, and to confute all heretics and schismatics — upon ' the divine authority of the holy Scriptures — upon the ' authority of the writings of the primitive Fathers, as to ' the faith and practice of the primitive Church — upon the ' Divinity of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ — upon the ' Divinity of the Holy Ghost — upon the Articles of the ' Christian Faith, as comprehended in the Apostles' and ' Nicene Creeds. " Also I direct, that thirty copies of the eight Divinity ' Lecture Sermons shall be always printed, within two ' months after they are preached, and one copy shall be ' given to the Chancellor of the University, and one copy ' to the Head of every College, and one copy to the Mayor ' of the city of Oxford, and one copy to be put into the ' Bodleian Library; and the expense of printing them shall ' be paid out of the revenue of the Land or Estates given ' for establishing the Divinity Lecture Sermons ; and the ' Preacher shall not be paid, nor be entitled to the revenue, ' before they are printed. " Also I direct and appoint, that no person shall be qua- ' lified to preach the Divinity Lecture Sermons, unless he ' hath taken the degree of Master of Arts at least, in one ' of the two Universities of Oxford or Cambridge ; and ' that the same person shall never preach the Divinity Lec- ' ture Sermons twice." PREFACE. IT seems proper to prefix to the present Volume a statement which may explain the recent interruption of the Series of the Bamp ton Lectures. In the beginning of the year 1833, the De legates of Estates of the University of Oxford declared the necessity of a far greater out lay on the Bampton Estate, than had been, or could conveniently be, provided for, by any yearly reserve of income for Repairs. The result of their representation was a Decree of Convocation, passed on the 22nd day of April, in the same year, whereby it was de termined that the Lectures should be sus pended for two years ; and that the proceeds of the Estate, during that interval, should be applied to the purposes of an expenditure, which had become unavoidable. The Author of the following Sermons, both in choosing and in handling his subject, has endeavoured to fulfil the intentions of the viii PREFACE. Founder of the Lecture ; and he trusts that he may have unfolded his views, in a manner not altogether unsatisfactory or unservice able to the general reader. He has also been desirous of consulting the advantage of the younger Members of the Clerical Profession and of Candidates for Holy Orders ; and has accordingly added Notes and Illustrations with an especial reference to their circum stances. To any of this class, whose attention he may be happy enough to engage, he begs leave to recommend, in the following exhortation of an ancient writer, a brief summary of the principles and precepts, which he has him self been anxious to bear in mind, and, to the utmost of his power, exemplify : " Depositum, inquit Apostolus, custodi. Ca- " tholicae Fidei talentum inviolatum inliba- " tumque conserva. Quod tibi creditum, hoc " penes te maneat, hoc a te tradatur. Aurum " accepisti : aurum redde. Nolo mihi pro "aliis alia subjicias. Nolo pro auro aut " impudenter plumbum aut fraudulenter " aeramenta supponas. Nolo auri speciem PREFACE. ix " sed naturam plane. O Timothee, O Sa- " cerdos, O Tractator, O Doctor, si te Di- " vinum munus idoneum fecerit, ingenio, " exercitatione, doctrina, esto spiritalis Ta- " bernaculi Beseleel ; pretiosas Divini dog- " matis gemmas exsculpe, fideliter coapta, " adorna sapienter, adjice splendorem, gra- " tiam, venustatem. Intelligatur, te exponente, " inlustrius quod antea obscurius credebatur, " Per te, posteritas intellectum gratuletur " quod ante vetustas non intellectum venera- " batur. Eadem tamen quae didicisti, doce ; " ut, cum dicas nove, non dicas nova." Vin- centii Lirinensis Commonit. I. He who would imbibe the spirit, which this admonition breathes, and observe the rules here laid down, must have recourse to the Remains of Christian antiquity ; from a wise and reverential use of which he will not fail to reap the most valuable and the richest fruits. The Author of these Lectures has sought to encourage the study of the Fathers, by furnishing a selection of passages, appro priate to his design, from the writings of some few of their number. It is hoped b x PREFACE. that these specimens, by reason of their in trinsic excellence, may effectually excite the Student to enter upon researches of his own, in this department of Inquiry. For the fur ther promotion of the same end, illustrative and explanatory remarks have been occa sionally introduced ; but, above all, care has been taken, by repeated references, to fix attention on the Works of Bishop Bull and the Reliquiae Sacrae of Dr. Routh. Under the guidance of these two Authors, the early dif ficulties of the way will be rendered smooth; a field of investigation, which is apt at first sight to appear unbounded, will become cir cumscribed within reasonable limits ; and in the well beaten tracks of Catholic Theo logy will be found sure footing amidst the dangers and safety from the misleading temp tations of a restless and speculative age, fond of novelty and eagerly aiming at discoveries even on the most sacred subjects. CONTENTS. SERMON I. Introduction to the whole Inquiry. St. John v. 39. Search the Scriptures, for in them ye think ye have eter nal life, and they are they which testify of me P. 1. SERMON II. On the Miracles of our Lord. St. Luke iv. 40. Now when the sun was setting, all they that had any sick with divers diseases brought them unto him ; and he laid his hands on every one of them, and healed them....%9. SERMON III. On the Miracles of our Lord. St. John xiv. 10. Believest thou not that I am in the Father and the Father in me ? The words that I speak unto you, I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, He doeth the works 59. SERMON IV. On the Parables of the Gospels. St. Mark iv. 33 and 34 (in part.) And with many such Parables spake He the word unto them, as they were able to hear it. But without a Parable spake He not unto them 87. SERMON V. On the Parables, as expounded by our Lord. St. Mark iv. 34 (in latter part.) And when they were alotie, He expounded all things to His disciples 116- Xll CONTENTS. SERMON VI. On our Lord's intercourse with Publicans and sinners. St. Luke xv. 1 and 2. Then drew near unto Him all the publicans and sinners for to hear Him. And ihe Pharisees and Scribes mur mured, saying : This man receiveth sinners and eateth with them 143. SERMON VII. On our Lord's guidance of such as sincerely sought instruction from Him. St. Matthew xix. 16. And, behold, one came and said unto Him : Good Mas ter, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 172 SERMON VIII. On our Lord's demeanour towards His chosen com panions. St. John xv. 15. Henceforth I call you not servants : for the servant knoweth not what his Lord doeth, but I have called you friends ; for all things that I have heard of my Father, I have made known unto you 199- SERMON I. John v. 39. Search the Scriptures, for in them ye think ye have eternal life, and they are they which tes tify of me. 1 HE interpreters of the New Testament have differed in opinion, with regard to the right method of reading and explaining these words. On the present occasion, and with a view to my present purpose, it is not neces sary to settle the dispute, to which the pas sage has given rise, by determining whether the words are to be understood imperatively or indicatively ; whether they are to be re garded as prescribing the duty, or stating the usual practice of those persons, whom our Lord more immediately addressed, and who were probably learned and inquisitive mem bers of the great Sanhedrim \ The last clause of the verse, independently of any questions that may affect the context, is a plain and a Note A. B 2 SERMON I. forcible declaration, on the part of our blessed Saviour, that the Scriptures — those Sacred Writings, which His hearers received as of Divine authority, and which they were there fore in duty bound to examine with care and diligence — are, in some peculiar sense, ivit- nesses concerning Himself. In the preceding portion of the same memorable Discourse, He had spoken of other testimony in his own favour — of the testimony of John, in the first place ; and of the yet stronger testimony of the works, which the Father had given Him to finish, in the next place ; which works did, in fact, constitute the witness of the Father. " The Father himself, which hath sent me, " hath borne witness of me b." The Jews, blind through prej udice, had overlooked these evidences, decisive as they were ; and our Lord, intent on persuading and convincing them, proceeded, in the last place, to remind them of the testimony, contained in those Inspired Writings, with which they already were, or might easily become familiar. " Search the Scriptures," or, " ye do search " the Scriptures ; for in them ye think ye " have" — ye seem to have, and, without doubt, really have— " eternal life, and they " are they, which testify of me." b St. John v. 37. SERMON I. 3 From the reference thus made to the Sa cred Writings in general, an obvious and un avoidable conclusion is, that they were, accord ing to our Saviour's own estimate, and in His unerring judgment, reckoned among the most important and most valuable means of making good His pretensions to that high distinction, which, in the same Discourse, He had already vindicated for Himself: " The " Father hath committed all judgment unto " the Son : that all men should honour the "Son, even as they honour the Father0." And it is interesting to observe how He ap pears, in this instance, to have given before hand the sanction of His authority to the early Apologists of the Christian cause, who are well known deliberately to have preferred, in their arguments both with Jewish dispu tants and with Heathen antagonists, that branch of evidence, which the Prophetic writings supply. But on the same reference may fairly be grounded a presumption, that some portions of the Sacred Volume above others have an especial claim on our attention and regard. Whilst the expressions employed by our Lord warrant an expectation that no page of Holy Scripture will prove altogether barren <= St. John v. 22,23. B 2 4 SERMON I. of instruction respecting Himself, His nature, His Person, and His offices; whilst they di rect the views of all, who were then within reach of His voice— of all, who should after wards become His Disciples — to the abund ance of types and prophecies, which pervade the whole Volume of the Old Testament ; they serve to point, in a precise and determi nate manner, to such portions as are eminent above the rest, in conveying " the testimony " of Jesus Christ d ;" they seem, with an emphatic earnestness, to recommend these portions in particular to the exacter scrutiny of every student of the Sacred Word. Nor can it be wrong to impart to the expressions of the text, a prospective, as well as a retrospec tive, meaning. We may surely find in them an anticipation of those Records of our Lord's own life and conduct — of His words and actions, which were, soon after the time when He spake as man with men, to be pre pared by His faithful followers, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit — which were by them to be added to the Canon of Inspired Scripture ; and which were, in every future age of the Church and of the world, to exhibit Him, as at once the object of religious wor ship and the pattern to be humbly imitated. d Rev. i.2. SERMON I. 5 There cannot for one moment be a doubt, where Christians are to look for a display of the character ; for a disclosure of the doc trines, of the Master, after whose name they are called. For them, it is the record of the Holy Gospels, which testifies of Him. In that record they begin — in the same record they expect to terminate, their sacred studies ; well assured that, after their widest excur sions into the field of Biblical learning — after their most accurate investigation of the Law, the Prophets and the Psalms — after their most attentive survey and most dili gent examination of that developement of the Christian scheme, which is contained in the Apostolical Epistles — well assured that, after all, it will be their highest wisdom and their only safety to return again to the pure, simple, unadorned narratives of the Four Evangelists e ; and from them, as from a per ennial source, to " draw with joy the water " of salvation f" — " that living water, which " shall spring up within them into everlast- .. ing lifes.: Under a deep sense of the preeminent in terest, which thus belongs to the Gospel his tory, and of the vast importance which may safely be assigned to that portion of the New e Note B. f Isaiah xii. 3. S St. John iv. 14. B 3 6 SERMON I. Testament, I purpose, in the course of Lec tures about to be delivered from this place, to dwell on certain selected passages of the Life and Doctrine — the conduct and dis courses, of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ. Numerous have been the attempts to compile, from the authentic history of the Evangelists, the life of Christ ; and they have been attended with various degrees of success, according to the various views, senti ments and abilities of their authors. It was scarcely possible that any should entirely fail ; since the instance is one, in which the original sources of information are copious and easy of access — in which the character and actions to be pourtrayed, even by such as form the lowest conception of them, are beyond measure wonderful and engaging. Hence, from the earliest Harmonies down to the latest endeavours to put forth a well con nected series of the events and circumstances of our Saviour's Life, much valuable service has been rendered to the interpretation of the New Testament and to the cause of our Holy Religion. Fresh light has been, from time to time, thrown on the difficulties of the Sacred Narrative : apparent discrepancies have been reconciled ; alleged inconsistencies have disappeared ; and the devout Christian has SERMON I. 7 derived, from the labours of the learned, a continually increasing power of commending to the acceptance, even of the doubtful and disputatious mind, the unexceptionable Me morials of the Founder of his faith. I am far from intending to add one more to the number of these laudable and useful attempts. Such an undertaking is not well suited to this place or occasion ; and, if it were so, would be less necessary in our Uni versity, where diligent care has, often in for mer times and recently in our own, been be stowed upon this inquiry. My intention rather is to draw, from the Evangelical His tory, some of the leading illustrations and instances, which it has been providentially appointed to preserve, of the, "great mystery "of Godliness — God manifest in the fleshh." My endeavour will be to apply to practice the Christian doctrine on the union in our Saviour's person, ofthe Divine with the human nature, by bringing into distinct notice not indeed formal statements on the subject, but some ofthe principal facts, events and circum stances of the four Gospels, in which that great doctrine is assumed, and, if I may so speak, exhibited in action. I am well aware, that the high argument h 1 Tim. iii. 16. B 4 8 SERMON I. with which my design is connected, little re quires the aid of any fresh advocate. " The " Divinity of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus " Christ," is a subject, for the consideration of which, the Institution of this Lecture has, in express terms, provided ; and to which, ac cordingly, the talents and learning of several of my predecessors have been usefully direct ed. Room is however left for subordinate, although they may be feebler, efforts; and the following remarks will shew the nature and amount of the advantage proposed, on the present occasion, to be sought from an un controversial study of the Holy Gospels. For weak and imperfect creatures, such as we find ourselves to be, endowed indeed with intellectual, moral and spiritual faculties, but impeded in the exercise of those faculties by a material body, their allotted vehicle and in strument ; surrounded also by external ob jects, that suit our appetites and gratify our senses ; for creatures, like ourselves, thus cir cumstanced, one of the most difficult of all efforts is, to withdraw our thoughts from the works of God, and fix them steadily on the mighty Work-master, the Author, the Pre server and the Governor of all that is within us and around us. " Lo ! He goeth by us, " and we see Him not : He passeth on also, SERMON I. 9 " but we perceive him not'." Even when some determined exertion of the mind has been made, and has proved not altogether unsuc cessful, there is danger lest the result should be a cold, barren, unpractical speculation ; or an awful impression, thrilling for the soul, while it shall last, likely soon to fail ; and cal culated, even during its short continuance, rather to alienate the affections from a Being so tremendous than to attract and win the heart. The universal tendency of fallen man to idolatry sets this difficulty in a clear light. In every age and every region, he has embo died such notions as tradition may have con veyed or reason have suggested, of the Divine Being and attributes, in gross, earthly forms, perceptible and tangible ; and thus he has hoped to keep alive in his own bosom and in the breasts of others, some sense of that Su preme authority, to which he acknowledges the duty of submission. The attempt is vain — the hope deceitful ; for the result has ever been what a distinguished Father of the Church has well called — "a godless multiplicity of "gods'1," a real and practical forgetfulness and oversight of the true God. It pleased the Almighty and All-wise ' Jobix. 11. J Note C. 10 SERMON I. Jehovah, in placing one chosen nation under a peculiar dispensation, to provide against the common danger in this respect, by adopting an extraordinary system of direct and fre quent interference, whereby His presence and superintendence might be indubitably ascer tained; whilst, at the same time, He with held all such manifestation of His glory, as might afford occasion or excuse for material representation. " The Lord spake unto you " out of the midst of the fire : ye heard the " voice of the words, but saw no similitude ; " only ye heard a voice. Take ye therefore " good heed unto yourselves ; for ye saw no " manner of similitude on the day that the " Lord spake unto you in Horeb, out of the " midst of the fire ; lest ye corrupt yourselves, " and make you a graven image, the simili- " tude of any figure, the likeness of male or " female, the likeness of any beast that is on " the earth, the likeness of any winged fowl " that flieth in the air, the likeness of any " thing that creepeth on the ground, the like- " ness of any fish that is in the waters be- " neath the earth ; and lest thou lift up thine " eyes unto heaven ; and when thou seest the " sun and the moon and the stars, even all the " host of heaven, shouldest be driven to wor- " ship them, and serve them, which the Lord SERMON I. 11 " thy God, hath divided unto all nations, " under the whole heaven k." Notwithstanding these precautions — notwithstanding prohibi tions thus plain and express — in spite of the scheme of the Theocracy, in the beginning of their national independence ; and the con tinuance during the gradual decline of the Theocracy, and through the whole period of their national existence, of a system of rites, ceremonies and ordinances, well adapted to carry into all the transactions of private and ordinary life an abiding sense of the presence and authority of God — the descendants of Abraham often betrayed the degenerate ten dency of the common race of Adam ; and, by their actions, loudly declared: "'We will be " as the heathen, as the families of the coun- " tries, to serve wood and stone"1." In the con summation of the Law by the Gospel ; in that system of " grace and truth," which followed " the law given by Moses and which came by " Jesus Christ"," we are called to observe a striking contrast between the Old and the New Dispensation, of superior means for accom plishing the same end. " God, who at sundry " times and in divers manners spake in time " past unto the Fathers by the Prophets, hath, k Deut. iv. 12, 15—19. ' Ezek. xx. 32. m Note D. n St. John i. 16, 17. 12 SERMON I. " in these last days, spoken unto us by His " Son, whom He hath appointed heir of all " things0." " The Word was made flesh, and " dwelt among us, (and we beheld His glory, " the glory as of the only begotten of the " Father,) full of grace and truth p." In this arrangement of the Divine wisdom and good ness, is made a suitable provision for the wants — by this astonishing Dispensation is afforded an effectual help, for the weakness of our moral and spiritual nature*1. And of the Holy Gospels, the divinely ordained means of announcing and publishing this arrange ment and this dispensation to the world, it is one chief purpose — one main end and office, to place within constant reach of man the provision and the help, of which he is, and ever will be in need. If we rightly under stand and duly use, our Christian privilege, we are allowed to see God, no longer by dim analogy ; nor darkly through the ill-reflecting mirror of human reasoning and deduction, but substantially revealed, in the Person of His well-beloved Son, in whom " 'dwelleth all " the fulness of the Godhead bodily5." The Divine Majesty is thus veiled, without being in any degree sullied. The awe and reve- ° Heb. i. 1, 2. P St. John i. 14. i Note E. r Col. ii. 9. s Note F. SERMON I. 13 rence, which the presence of God is fitted to inspire, are tempered and moderated by a sense of His condescension to our low estate. His attributes of justice and of benevolence, which most nearly concern us, as subjects of His moral government, are rendered dis tinctly intelligible; and are shewn to be exer cised towards us on principles that are in strict accordance with the apprehensions of our minds and the sentiments of our hearts ; whilst His attributes of power, of knowledge and of purity, (attributes, on the first disco very of which weak, sinful and dependent beings may well shudder,) are so brought near and so benignantly accommodated to our thoughts and feelings, as to encourage our re liance on them, and our hope of being bene fited by them. Thus is it that, on the most momentous of all subjects — on the first prin ciple of all true religion — we are secured against the danger of running, on the one hand, into cold, philosophical abstractions ; and, on the other, into gross conceptions; into low, unworthy, and debasing practices. But in order to gain this security, in order to avail ourselves of this, our lofty privilege, it becomes necessary to dwell, with fixed atten tion, on the Gospel narratives; and to con template, with steadfast eye, the adorable 14 SERMON I. Person and the wonderful actions of the Son of God, who was also the Son of man. We must form the habit of listening, with a quick, intelligent and willing ear, to His engaging eloquence. We must take pains to trace His unwearied footsteps, in His journeyings of charity through Judaea, Samaria and Galilee. We must observe,- and, in observing, pause to admire, the ever wakeful activity of His bene ficence, the mild majesty of His demeanour, the firmness of His patience, the simplicity, the beauty, the practical wisdom and power ful efficiency of the lessons, which He taught. Then are the hearts of His faithful followers most likely to burn within them — to glow with a devout and holy satisfaction in what they have already learned, and with an eager curiosity to learn yet more — when " He," through the medium of the Gospels, as it were, again " talks with them by the way, and opens " to them the Scriptures '." Through that me dium especially, are we invited and encou raged to " make ourselves acquainted with " God, and be at peace."" By becoming fami liar with those scenes, in which the incarnate Word relieved the wants, soothed the sorrows, and entered into the secret thoughts and feel ings of the companions and hearers, by whom ' St. Luke xxiv. 32. u j0k xx\\ oj SERMON I. 15 He was surrounded, are we to gain a just con ception — a conception that can be applied and used, of the goodness, the omnipresence and the all-pervading influence of God. The soft and tender tones of mercy, which, in the Gos pels, pronounce the sentence of forgiveness of sins — the uncomplaining, yet touching notices, therein preserved, of trials undergone, of con tumely borne, of privations and sufferings en dured, for the sake, not of the meek and mer ciful Redeemer Himself, but of sinners, way ward and perverse — His persecutors and His murderers ; these are intended and well cal culated to convey to our inmost souls a lowly hope of reconciliation with God, even for our selves, to be effected by the interference of " the one Mediator between God and man, " the man Christ Jesus\" By us the pre cepts of the Divine Law are to be understood, as they are graciously interpreted in the Dis courses of our Lord ; and to be obeyed, as they are in the same Discourses enforced by the most cogent motives, the most persuasive addresses to each feeling of admiration, grati tude and love. In the prayers, which He of fered to His Father; above all, in that hal lowed form of prayer, which He prescribed for the use of His disciples, we are to learn x 1 Tim. ii. 5. 16 SERMON I. the duty and the privilege of Prayer y. When He speaks at once of the omniscience and the omnipotence of God, and of the absolute necessity of prayer — when He thus combines the attributes of God and the duty of man, which a short-sighted philosophy has often deemed irreconcilable with each other — we are called to remember and to confess that we are listening to a Teacher, who speaks " as one having authority and not as the " Scribes2 ;" that, as " the only begotten Son, " which is in the bosom of the Father"," He has, in this instance, " declared the Father" — explained His dealings, and given an ac count of His dispensations15. Nor let it be said that the duty and the advantage of having recourse to the Gospel History, for purposes like these, are too well known and too universally acknowledged to need any special enforcement or any express guidance and direction. It may justly be feared that such is far from being the case. It may reasonably be doubted whether or not, in some former ages of the Church, there have been found — whether or not, in the present age, there are found, the kind and the degree of interest in the Evangelical Re- y Note G. 7 St. Matt. vii. 29, * St. John i. 18. b Note jj SERMON I. 17 cords, which it will be the object of these Lectures to awaken and keep alive. The Holy Gospels have undoubtedly been sifted with a jealous anxiety, of which the history of Literature scarcely affords any parallel in stance. The scruples of friends and the sus picions of enemies ; the acumen of learned critics, professing an entire indifference re specting what they contemptuously call Dog mas of faith, and actuated by curiosity alone ; the arts of wily and insidious adversaries; the attacks of open and avowed assailants ; all have contributed towards the severity of that ordeal, to which the Memorials of our Lord and Saviour have been subjected. Nor is it possible to reflect on the earlier dangers of suppression, depravation and cor ruption, to which they were exposed, or on the daring speculations, for which they have in modern times furnished occasion, without being led thankfully to acknowledge that vigilance of the Christian Church, which, under the good Providence of God, has suc ceeded in preserving the sacred treasure and in handing it down, from age to age, unmuti- lated and unimpaired. There is matter for farther thankfulness in the consideration that the very difficulties, which, from the nature of the case, have unavoidably beset 18 SERMON I. a written History, have been over-ruled for good. As, in ancient times, the existence of spurious or altered Gospels and the attempts to pass them current, had the effect of ren dering unambiguous and undoubted the evi dence in favour of the genuine and authentic writings of the Evangelists ; so, in our own times, the numerous questions that have arisen and have been warmly agitated, re specting the original sources, the inspiration, the language, the comparative merits of the Four Gospels, have been followed by the ex cellent result of so attracting and employing the various faculties of the human mind as to arrest and fix attention ; and of fixed at tention the farther result has generally been and surely will be, for each well trained and judicious inquirer, to impart an increased confidence in referring to witnesses, distinct yet harmonious — to reporters of the same events and circumstances, marvellously agree ing in the main, yet so far differing as to shew plainly that their general agreement was without concert or collusion. From re searches of the deepest interest, in which he has been engaged, the student at length rises, abundantly satisfied with regard to the chief subject of his inquiry ; and having moreover gained the incidental advantage of impress- SERMON I. 19 ing on his memory and engraving on his heart the occurrences and the lessons of the most important of all Histories. And among these lessons are doubtless included many, which put prominently forward the combina tion, in the Person of our Lord, of Divine perfections with human virtues ; many, which shew, not in the vivid colouring of Prophetic description, but in the energy of life and ac tion, " the high and lofty One that inhabit- " eth eternity, whose name is Holy, dwelling " also with him that, is of a contrite and " humble spirit, to revive the spirit of the " humble, and to revive the heart of the con- " trite ones0." True as this statement is of the collateral and, as it were, incidental ad vantage, which attends even the critical exa mination of the Holy Gospels, when it is un dertaken and carried on with sincerity, in a serious temper and by competent ability; it may still be contended that far less fre quently than was either to be expected or to be desired, have the Gospels been approached and surveyed as a conspicuous portion of that " matchless Temple, in which the Deity is " preached and adored ;" and that far too seldom have they been examined and em ployed, for the express and designed end of c Is. lvii. 15. C 2 20 SERMON I. " increasing the awe and exciting the devo- " tion" of the lowly worshipped. On the present occasion then it is pro posed that " disputes and questions, enemies " to piety, abatements of true devotion and " hitherto in this cause but over-patiently " heard, shall for a while take their reste." Heresy will be, not so much confuted, as an ticipated and excluded. An endeavour will be made so to store the mind with sound and wholesome doctrine and so to bring home that doctrine in all its practical bearings on the heart and conduct, in respect at least of one grand and influential verity, that " there " may be no place left, either for error in re- " ligion or for viciousness in lifef." Against the vain love of discovery and theory on sub jects too lofty for the reach, too dark for the penetration of man — against the fatal ten dency to be misled by plausible but shallow conceits and notions — against a fond indul gence in subtle refinements and in perplex ing niceties of speculation — against error, alike in its earlier and in its later forms ; a security will be sought in the plain letter of the Sacred Narrative — in the affecting, yet simple statements, which the pages of the d Note I. e Hooker's Eccles. Pol. V. 67. f Exhortation in the Form for the Ordering of Priests. SERMON I. 21 Holy Gospels contain. Had the curious and restless temper of our race submitted to this salutary control, had men been satisfied with that truth, which has been revealed for their information and comfort, the Christian Church would have been spared the misfortune and the misery of witnessing many serious evils that have disturbed her peace and diminished her influence. The annals of primitive and even Apostolical times would not then have had to record an occasional denial of the pro per Divinity — a more frequent denial of the real humanity, of our Lord and Saviours — the annals of the succeeding ages would not have related such attempts to reconcile the notion of His distinct Personality with the doctrine of the Divine unity or to explain the union of the two natures in His Person as ended — as indeed could not but end — in inextricable confusion of thought and lan guage ; nor would they have furnished so many proofs as they now unhappily contain of a rashness which boldly intruded into the sanctuary of the presence of the Most High — and presumed confidently to decide the subtlest questions that could arise respecting His essence and attributes. Neither would the more recent history of the Church, have g Note K. C 3 22 SERMON I. been disfigured by accounts of unprofitable discussions and dogmatical decisions, at direct variance with each other ; sometimes, on mo mentous questions, concerning the Person and ministry of our Lord, which affect the whole scheme of Christian doctrine ; at other times, on minor points, connected with the same great subject, which admit not of being settled by any efforts of human ingenuity or of being applied to practice, and which there fore, in spite of the exaggerations of party zeal, on the one side and on the other, must be pronounced to be, after all, indifferent h. Had the Gospel History been thoroughly learned and candidly apprehended and ac cepted, a large portion of Christendom would not have been still disgraced and disadvan taged by a machinery of intercessors, of images and of relics, which bars the approach of sinners towards the throne of God, and places serious obstacles in their way, as often as they sue for "mercy" and seek "grace to " help in time of need ' :" nor, under the purer forms of Protestantism, would there have been found that extreme difficulty, which still exists, of realizing the Divine Pre sence and of " enduring, as seeing Him, who " is invisiblek." h Note L. ' Heb. iv. 16. k Hek x; ^7. SERMON I. 23 There remains yet another view, under which I am desirous of recommending my present Design to your favourable notice. That our Lord is the perfect exemplar of His Church, is a truth universally acknow ledged ; and that to become so was one end of His appearance upon earth will scarcely be denied by any Christian. In the midst of this general agreement, however, there exist wide differences of opinion ; and on a point, which, at first sight, appears manifest and incontrovertible, misapprehensions and mis takes have prevailed that call for our caution, watchfulness and care. Some insist that to furnish a pattern of piety and virtue and to supply the most solemn attestation in their favour, were the highest purposes of our blessed Saviour's life, sufferings and death. His moral and religious lessons these persons profess to value, as being in harmony with His own conduct ; as deriving illustration and practical influence from His actions ; and as serving, in their turn, to throw light upon the scenes, in which He vouchsafed to be present. In Him they behold such an union, as they can perceive in no other in stance, of .strictness of rule with undeviating practice ; of unbending firmness of principle and precept with a correspondent exactness c i 24 SERMON I. of manners and behaviour. In the meantime, they overlook the sublimer mysteries of Re demption; as they dwell not on the grandeur of the achievements of the Son of God, in behalf of the race of man, so neither do they contemplate that union in His Person of the Divine with the human nature, by virtue of which He is in Holy Scripture represented to have effected those achievements. Others, conversant with the details of Evangelical doctrine, as those details have been drawn from Holy Scripture and ar ranged in one well-compacted system, confess indeed that they too see, in the Divine Re deemer, a copy of each excellence, at which it is their duty to aim. They hear His voice, which loudly, yet with winning tenderness, bids them " learn of Him" and follow the ex ample of His " meekness and lowliness of " heart ' ;" and they declare their resolute purpose to comply with the command. But the real tendency of their minds is in an other direction. They are fond of fixing their thoughts and their hopes chiefly on the great work, which Jesus Christ accomplished for mankind ; the faith in Him, which they endeavour to cherish, is a simple reliance on His sufferings, regarded as vicarious ; on His 1 St. Matt. xi. 29. SERMON I. 25 meritorious cross and passion ; on His pre cious death and His prevailing intercession. Now it is conceived that both of these op posite parties require equally to be reminded that there is a way of contemplating the Holy Gospels, which they have too much neglected. The former class of persons need to be admonished that, in the Person and character of our Lord, are displayed the imi- table attributes of God, which by virtue of their mysterious connection with the sinless yet sympathizing nature of man are brought down to the level of our perceptions. They are to be told that through Him we can best learn what is that perfection of virtue, in which we are by Himself exhorted to become like our Father, which is in heaven ; and that then only are His human virtues likely to exert their full and transforming influence over our souls, when we behold them in their just relation to the glory of His Godhead. Such must have been the impression, under which St. Paul charged the Philippians to " let this mind be in them, which was also in " Christ Jesus m" — for, having given this charge, he immediately insists upon that stu pendous proof of condescension, and humility, ™ Phil. ii. 5. 26 SERMON I. which was afforded by concealing under " the " form of a servant and the likeness of men," that nature, in which He was " equal with " God." It is clear that St. Paul founds the precept here given on the principle that our attempts to imitate even His lowly temper, depend, for their success, upon keeping in view the Divine glory of our Pattern". Nor can we be surprised that they who forget this principle of the inspired Apostle, and who, in denying or overlooking the Divine nature and essential dignity of our Lord, profess an in tention of magnifying the importance and increasing the value of His human example, are disappointed of their hope. Their griev ous error returns upon themselves ; and by lowering their conceptions of the Saviour's. majesty, they, in fact, diminish the useful ness — they really detract from the influence, of His high and holy example. Again, the second class of persons require to be cautioned against attaching undue im portance to theoretical accuracy and system atic precision — against spoiling the simplicity and tarnishing the lustre of the plan of sal vation by the devices of men. They are to be roused to a just feeling of the indispen- n Note M. SERMON I. 27 sable necessity, after all that has been done for them, of a great work, which is to be effected within them — of a moral renewal and a spiritual elevation, towards which, un der the promised agency of the Holy Spirit, every possible aid will be wanted and must be employed. Nor can they be more effec tually roused to this wholesome feeling, or more happily guided and assisted, when they are once under its influence, than by being directed to form an intimate acquaintance with the Gospel narratives ; to renew once more the scenes therein described ; and to borrow from the Sacred page the lively image of a Friend and an Instructor, human and therefore suited to all the exigencies of daily life ; Divine, and therefore ever near at hand, and " mighty to save0." It is unnecessary to add more by way of introduction to that undertaking, which I shall endeavour, in the ensuing Lectures, to execute. For the present, therefore, I shall content myself with expressing an earnest hope that my attempts may be made, and their results accepted, in the spirit, which dictated to a bright ornament of the Western Church, in the fifth century, the following 0 Is. lxiii. 1. 28 SERMON I. language: " Let the weakness of man ever " sink under the burden of telling the glory " of God, and own itself unequal to the task " of unfolding the works of His mercy. Dull " in perception, slow in talent, wanting in " eloquence for such a theme, let us make " our utmost efforts, and we shall still find " that even our right thoughts and feelings, " concerning the Majesty of our Lord and " Saviour, will prove too lowP !" P Note N. SERMON II. St. Luke iv. 40. Now when the sun was setting, all they that had any sick with divers diseases brought them unto him ; and he laid his hands on every one of them, and healed them. 1 HE most cursory reader of the Gospels, in casting only a superficial glance over their contents, is compelled to take notice of the Miracles, ascribed to our Lord during His ministry, and recorded, sometimes, in a brief and comprehensive summary, like that of the text ; at other times and more frequently, in detailed and circumstantial narratives. It is to this feature of the Evangelical History that I purpose, on the present occasion, to draw your attention. I intend to contemplate the supernatural works performed — the extraor dinary deeds of power and of mercy done by Jesus Christ " in the days of His flesh"" — more especially with a view to ascertain what indications they afford of the glory of His a Heb. v. 7. 30 SERMON II. Divine nature — to mark how, through their means, some rays of a Divine effulgence are shed over His Person and actions — and finally, to observe in what manner and to what de gree these instances, in which " Himself took " our infirmities and bare our sicknesses b," may be applied to our consolation and sup port; how they may convey into our souls an assurance of the presence of God with our selves, and may serve to shew that we too are nearly interested in the display and the ope ration of the sublime attributes of the Most High. Profiting by a suggestion of St. Au gustine, I shall " ask of the very miracles of " the Gospels what it is, which they speak " concerning Christ ? They, if they be but " rightly understood, have a tongue of their " own, and can speak. For, since Christ " Himself is the Word of God, each deed of " Him, who is the Word, is to be by us " esteemed a Word from God c." The way however must be cleared by a few preliminary remarks. The meaning of the word miracles '\ so far as we are at present concerned with it, may be assumed to be well- known and universally granted. In the ac ceptation of works, surpassing human power and addressing the senses of those who attest b Matt. viii. 17. c Note O. d Note p SERMON II. 31 them, this word has been and will continue to be, understood, by every man of common honesty, who knows the ordinary use of lan guage and has good sense enough to see that, for the convenience of intercourse, he must adhere to that use. That unbelievers them selves sometimes forget their own pretended difficulties and objections, and the question ings and cavils, thence arising, is evident from the fact that they are far from relying on any niceties of definition, when they are brought into actual conflict with their Chris tian opponents. They then choose rather to adopt the method of denying altogether the existence or of explaining away the charac teristics, of facts, which, as they are alleged and stated to have taken place, they them selves do not hesitate to call miraculous. Now it is to be observed that the name of miracles is given to certain actions of our blessed Lord, in precisely the same sense, in which it is ap plied to certain works of Prophets, under the Old Dispensation ; of Apostles and Teachers, under the Gospel ; and that, in all cases, the works, so called, are regarded and employed, by the advocates of Revealed Religion, as serving one and the same purpose of evi dence, in favour of the Divine commission of those who perform them. Since this whole 32 SERMON II. subject is one, upon which some indistinct ness of conception is apt to lurk, even in minds well-informed and for the most part well-regulated, it becomes important that every statement, with regard to it, should be as clear, as explicit and as secure from the danger of mistake, as language will allow. Be it then remembered that miracles were for our Saviour Christ, exactly what similar works were for the Prophets, who preceded, and for the Apostles and Preachers of the Gospel, who followed, Himself. For Him and for them, these wonderful works were cre dentials, proving them to be messengers from God, shewing that God was with them, add ing the sanction and authority of God to all those words and works of theirs, for which they claimed such sanction and authority. Accordingly, to all Scriptural miracles in com mon have belonged, the sure marks, the un doubted characteristics, the inseparable ac companiments of plain and palpable matters of fact. As matters of fact, they were, at first, fearlessly submitted to eye-witnesses; as such, they were published, and recorded in writing, at or soon after, the times of their occur rence ; as such, they have been preserved and handed down, through the instrumentality of authentic History. Nor is it a difficult matter SERMON II. 33 to discover the suitableness oi miracles to an swer that valuable end, which has been as signed to theme. In works, that display more than human power and, at the same time, are declared, by those who do them, to be done expressly that they may indicate the presence and the interference of God — in such works are undoubtedly seen, so many real tokens of the Divine presence and inter ference ; for the human mind here argues (and if there be security against fatal error in the reason, which the Creator has implanted in us, it justly argues) that God, the God of holiness and truth, will not allow, for the purposes of imposture, an abuse of His awful name, or a subversion of the laws and order of His natural government, on the part of beings, of whatever rank, still created, infe rior and dependent ; subject to His control and ever placed at His entire disposal. Be yond proving a Divine commission and sanc tion, however, the direct argumentative force of miracles does not go. Nor will the Christ tian student find cause for any serious un easiness, if he should be led to observe that the miracles of Jesus Christ have not al ways, exactly in the way, in which we should have expected, been urged even thus far, by e Note Q. D 34 SERMON II. those distinguished defenders ofthe Christian cause, whose proximity to the life-time of our Lord might, at first sight, seem to render likely a frequent recurrence to this particular line of argument and a decided partiality for it. Let it not be imagined or surmised that the Fathers of the Church have preserved si lence, on the subject of the Gospel miracles; or have shrunk from the duty of maintaining the reality of the facts of the Sacred History, on all fit occasions. One golden fragment, which Eusebius has preserved, is a specimen of the contrast, that, in the earliest times, was drawn between the works of our Saviour and the practices of mere pretenders to extraor dinary powers f. " Now the works of our Sa- " vi our were ever before the eyes of men ; " for they were real ; the persons, whose dis- " eases were healed ; they, who rose from the " dead — these were objects of sight, not only " in the act of receiving cures and of rising; " but also, in their open continuance after- " wards among men ; and this, not only while " our Saviour sojourned upon earth, but af- " ter His removal also ; for they lived a con- " siderable while, so that some of them have " reached even my own times." Such are the words—the few, but precious f Note R. SERMON II. 35 words — of a cotemporary and surviving scho lar of the Apostles ; the abruptness of their commencement (for they begin with a con junction of contrast) puts before us, in a for cible manner, the nature of that whole pas sage of his Apology, from which they have been torn ; and gives us an affecting hint of the kind of loss which we have, in this in stance, to deplore. Nor is this primitive writer singular, in the notice, which he takes, of the subject ; or in the purpose, to which he applies his just and discriminating view of the case. It would be easy to collect an un interrupted series of testimonies to the same effect, from his age downwards, until we should reach that point of time in the Chris tian era, at which no farther interest would be attached to the inquiry. Passages, which have been sometimes quoted from the most eminent Christian Apologists of the three first centuries, (and the number of such pas sages might easily be increased) establish be yond contradiction their cordial acceptance of and firm confidence in, the miracles of the Gospel Historys. They often go so far as to derive from those miracles direct proofs of the Divine nature of Him who wrought them. s Note S. i) 2 36 SERMON II. If, however, it be granted, that in some re markable instances they fall short of expecta tions which we may have formed; and ap pear to us to unfold this particular argument less fully, or to insist on it less strongly than we could have desired, we may rest assured that their conduct was guided by a prudent reference to those habits of thought, and pre possessions of their adversaries, of which we can perceive the very distinct traces in their own allusions, statements and answers. They themselves knew well — they have often shewn that they knew well — how to distinguish the Christian miracles from the juggling tricks and lying wonders of magic, and its kindred arts : yet was it expedient that, in selecting and enforcing their arguments, they should advert to the blindness, which could not see — to the perverseness and wilfulness, which would not perceive, the manifest and striking difference. Meanwhile, for any appearance of omitting, or undervaluing the argument from the miracles of our Lord on the part of Christians ; for any insensibility to the nature and efficacy of the same argument, on the part of the enemies of Christianity, an abund ant compensation is made by the service, which has, in this respect, been rendered to ourselves and to the Church for ever. Our SERMON II. 37 certain knowledge — our satisfactory and en tire assurance of the reality of those miracu lous facts, on which our faith is founded, we partly owe to the conspiring and coinciding testimonies of both friends and foes, in the early ages of Christianity. On all hands, the facts are acknowledged ; the events in ques tion are allowed to have happened. The disputes turn rather on the character, the sources and the ends of the works done, than on the existence of the works themselves. This is an observation of no small moment ; since it is impossible to doubt that such Jew ish objectors, as Trypho and his companions, or such heathen adversaries as Celsus and Porphyry would gladly and eagerly have availed themselves of every possibility of im pugning facts, which it cost them much trouble to explain away and to deprive of the force of evidence. Had these acute and skilful disputants adopted a different method ; had they ventured to deny the assertions and to refute the statements of their Christian anta gonists, we should undoubtedly have received, at the hands of the latter, a vindication well suited to what would then have been the posture of affairs — a vindication, to which their abilities were fully competent, and for which they were furnished with all requisite d 3 38 SERMON II. materials. But, under the actual circum stances of the case, we are in possession of proofs, which, if they cannot be called stronger, are, at all events, simpler and less embarrassed than they would otherwise have been ; we secure a firm hold of that only link in the chain of evidence, which it was the office of antiquity to supply ; and, living ourselves in an atmosphere of light, which the united in fluence of reason and of religion has cleared of the mists of superstition and of the illu sions of a disordered imagination, we can calmly behold and justly estimate the rela tions, tendencies and results of facts, con cerning which eye-witnesses were not more certain than ourselves. — Never, indeed, ought we to forget, that the complete and perfect demonstration ofthe Messiah includes within its ample range an astonishing variety of con siderations, and makes its loud and unanswer able appeal to every faculty of the mind and every feeling of the heart of man ; yet are we also bound to remember, that it ultimately and originally rests upon the solid and deeply- laid foundations of Prophecy and Miracles— of Prophecy, fulfilled in the Person and the Life — of Miracles, wrought by the power of, Jesus Christ — miracles, which in themselves and taken alone, are sufficient to prove to SERMON II. 39 establish beyond reasonable doubt — not in deed more, yet certainly not less, than that He came as a messenger from God. It is when we proceed to hear the message itself, which He brought from Heaven and delivered upon earth, that we gain the power of using the same miracles, in the way of proof, for a still higher purpose. It is when we listen to the doctrines which He, as a Di vinely sanctioned Instructor, laid down in His Discourses, and proposed to the acceptance of mankind, that we are enabled to connect His deeds with a power, not imparted but essen tial; not supernatural merely, but Almighty. When we find that, on one occasion, He was understood to claim God for his Father, in such sense as to make Himself equal with God h, and yet spake not one word, which im plied that His meaning had been mistaken ; when, on another occasion, we are informed of his clear statement, " I and my Father are " one ; " — and of the effect of that statement on the minds of his hearers, who " took up " stones to stone himk,'' and to His mild ex postulation replied, "For a good work we " stone thee not, but for blasphemy ; and be- " cause that Thou, being a man, makest thy- h St. John v. 17, 18. ' St. John x. 30. k St. John x.31.33. D 4 40 SERMON II. " self God ;" and when we learn that the statement was neither retracted, nor so ex plained as to lose its offensive character; since, after all that He had said, " they sought " again to take Him '"—when, in short, we discover that such were among the promi nent lessons of our Lord's ministry — then are we fairly warranted in drawing, even from His miracles, a decisive proof of His proper Divinity"1. He has Himself expressly declared that He is God. The declaration is one of the most solemn of all those, which He made in His office of " a Teacher come " from God ;" and, as such, " doing miracles, " which no man can do, except God be with " himn;" and every declaration made under circumstances like these, we are bound to be lieve. The direct and immediate proof here consists of our Saviour's own assertions ; but miracles impart to His assertions their weight and value in the scale of evidence. And thus is it, that the miraculous works of the Son of man may be alleged as indirect and mediate, yet valid proofs even of His Divine nature. If I have exposed myself to the charge of dwelling too long on considerations that can not but be familiar to the minds of many and that are only introductory to my main ' St. John x. 39. ¦" Note T n gt John ... ^ SERMON II. 41 design, I must own that I have deliberately done so. The suggestions, which I am about to offer, relate to such secondary use and application of the Gospel Miracles as can be properly and safely made only by those, who thoroughly understand and constantly keep in mind the grand and primary intent and purpose of those Miracles. By insisting therefore strongly on the latter point, I have endeavoured to guard, from the first, against any confusion of thought, on the Christian evidences, which might other wise arise ; and to discountenance an opinion, which has not been — which is not without its favourers, that the cause of our Holy Reli gion may be supported by what is called in ternal evidence, and may be left to stand without any acknowledged dependence on the basis of reasoning — of such sound reason ing as addresses the understanding and satis fies every demand of that master faculty. The everlasting welfare of man is involved in his religious hopes and persuasions ; nor were it fitting that interests so momentous, should be intrusted to the fluctuations of feel ing, the uncertainty of a lively imagination or the caprice of fancy. For the religious wants of our nature, a far better provision has been made ; and the means of a firm con- 42 SERMON II. viction, resting on the immovable ground of solid argument, have been abundantly sup plied. Numerous indeed are the instances, to be found within the Christian Church, of an unquestioning faith and a simple-hearted reliance, which supersede the anxiety and la bours of investigation. Such faith and such reliance are theblessed result of early train ing and the first reward of holiness of life. Meanwhile, ample materials for a full inves tigation are known to be at hand ; and un der an abiding assurance of this truth, every Christian is invited to apply to the Sacred Scriptures, in general, and to the Holy Gos pels, in particular, an exactness of inspection, which daily practice will improve ; whilst a discovery of many internal proofs of Reve lation and of many illustrations of its lead ing doctrines, which were at first hidden from his eyes, will soon repay his diligence. It becomes his privilege to occupy a citadel, whose situation and whose outworks bid de fiance to the assault of external foes ; and to dwell in an abode of safety and of peace, whose unfrequented pathways he may ex plore, without fear of interruption — whose fertility and beauty he may enjoy with a never-failing freshness of delight. The far ther his researches are carried, the more will SERMON II. 43 new views of the excellence and harmony of Divine truth open before him ; and in these opening views he will find the welcome con firmations of his faith — the means of remov ing doubts, of elucidating obscurities, of dis entangling perplexities, and of silencing the voice of forward disputation. It is to a research of this kind that I now at length proceed ; and, in pursuance of the plan I have proposed, look for such indica tions of the Divine nature and Majesty as the Miracles of our Lord and Saviour, recorded in the Gospels, may afford. My design ad mits not of being commenced, until the mira culous facts themselves have been allowed — have served their proper ends of evidence — and have assisted in establishing that great doctrine of our Lord's Divinity, which I also assume as, on other grounds, settled and proved, before I approach the subject. Now it may be, in the first place, remarked that such indications as we seek, are before hand likely to be found. If there be indeed that awful interval, which the voice of In spiration declares, between the messengers and ministers of the human race, whom God has been pleased to employ, and " His Son, " the brightness of His glory, the express " image of His person, and upholding all 44 SERMON II. " things by the word of His power °" — is it not probable that some characteristic differ ences of manner, of action and of language between Him and them, should impress on His miracles a note of the vast — the infinite superiority ? In agreement with this ante cedent probability, it has happened that mira culous powers were altogether withheld from St. John the Baptist, the immediate forerun ner of our Lord — the Elias of the New Tes tament — that illustrious messenger of God, who was " more than a Prophet ; than whom, " among them that are born of women, there " had not risen a greater15." If, in his instance, one proof that his successor was " mightier " than he, whose shoes he was not worthy to " bear q — the latchet of whose shoes he was " not worthy to stoop down and unloose r" — if, I say, one proof of St. John's inferiority was seen in the absence of miracles from his ministry ; we may be confirmed in our ex pectation of finding in other instances, where supernatural powers have been granted, some marks of inferiority, in connection with their exercise. Nor will it be denied that upon the minds of most readers of the Gospel His tory has been produced some vague and ge- o Heb. i.3. PSt. Matt. xi. 9. 11.14. qSt.Matt.iii.il. ' St. Mark i. 7. SERMON II. 45 neral impression of the superiority of our Lord, in respect of power and dignity, over other workers of miracles, whether before or after Himself. There is however one remark able passage, in which our great Teacher may seem to warn us that such an impression is wrong — that no such comparative view of Himself and His Apostles can be rightly en tertained. St. John relates that Jesus, in His last affecting conversation with His disciples before He " went forth over, the brook Ce- " dron and entered the garden of Gethse- " mane s," uttered that promise of extraordi nary powers, which the Evangelists represent Him to have given in plain terms on other occasions : "Verily, verily, I say unto you: He " that believeth on me, the works that I do, " shall he do also, and greater works than " these shall he do, because I go unto my " Father. And whatsoever ye shall ask in " my name, that will I do, that the Father " may be glorified in the Son. If ye shall " ask any thing in my name, I will do it*." In these verses may be discerned the same promise, which is elsewhere conveyed almost in the same terms. But here is found a fea ture of comparison not elsewhere to be ob served. " The works that I do, shall he do s St. John xviii. 1. * St. John xiv. 12. 46 SERMON II. " also ; and greater works than these shall " he do." The expression " works," intro duced into the latter clause of our transla tion, has no corresponding word in the ori ginal ; and it may be safely said that the na tural interpretation, for one who reads the Greek text without prepossession, is as follows : " The very works that I do, shall he do also ; " and results, yet greater than these works, " shall he produce*." By this interpretation, we are relieved from the difficult task, which many commentators have deemed themselves obliged to undertake, of seeking, in the mi racles of the Apostles, such marks as might, in some sort and in some sense, exalt them above those of their Master ; by the same in terpretation, we are left at perfect liberty to pursue that train of reflection, upon which we are now entering. In the marvellous works, performed by the Apostles and their companions, we perceive the fulfilment of one clause of our blessed Saviour's promise ; whilst in the end which those works pro moted and to which they were subservient, namely, the moral and spiritual improvement of mankind— the regeneration of the world— we behold that yet greater— that far more important, result, of which He also spake. " Note U. SERMON II. 47 As the end is greater than the means ; as the effect is more valuable than the instrument, through which it has been produced ; so was that conversion of Jews and Gentiles to His religion, which He anticipated and foretold, justly reckoned and fitly called by Jesus Christ a result of the Divine interference still greater — more valuable and "more im portant than even His own display of mira culous agency. When from a general acknowledgment and admiration of our Lord's superiority over other workers of miracles, however dis tinguished, we pass to a consideration of the particular points in which that supe riority was displayed, we can scarcely fail, in the very outset of the inquiry, to be struck with the number and the variety of His astonishing deeds. These circumstances alone have in them something very remark able and are well deserving of our especial notice. As we read the Gospel History, we are apt to forget into how narrow a space of time its occurrences were crowded. When, by an effort of attention, we have recalled to our recollection the real state of the case — when we calmly reflect that the public life and ministry of Jesus Christ were compre hended within the limits of three years at 48 SERMON II. the utmost, we are ready to own that the ( glory, which He manifested forth in His mi racles shone so continuously as to throw a lustre over every path He trod — over every abode, where He condescended to take up even His temporary home. — If such be the impression, fairly and naturally received from the history, which we read ; — from the details of narratives, with which we are favoured; how much more deeply must the same impression be made upon our minds, when we consider that we have before us, in the Evangelical Records, only a selection out of the whole number of our Saviour's deeds of power. There are many brief and incidental notices, which clearly intimate that the selection is, in fact, a very limited one ; and that the number of unrecorded miracles far surpasses that of those, which have been minutely re lated. Thus, St. John, in connection with the beginning of the ministry of our Lord and on the occasion of His attendance at Jeru salem, for the First Passover of His public life, says, " When He was in Jerusalem, at the " Passover, in the feast-day, many believed in " His name, when they saw the miracles which " He did." Previously to this occasion, we are acquainted with the particulars of one x St. John ii. 23. SERMON II. 49 miracle only, as having been performed by Christ ; and that one is the miracle at the marriage Feast of Cana, in Galilee, of which, we cannot doubt that the rumour would be brought to Jerusalem, by the people flocking thither for the Passover ; but to which, we are not at liberty to suppose that St. John makes the most distant allusion in the words that have been quoted. We are to remem ber that St. John is himself the sole and the exact narrator of that "beginning of miracles " at Cana, in Galilee," of which he states the result to have been that "the disciples of " Jesus believed on Him1." He has passed on to a time and place, totally distinct, when he speaks of the Paschal Feast at Jerusalem ; nor could he have chosen expressions better calculated than those which he has employed, to signify that the miracles, to which he here refers, were taking place — were in a course of performance — before the eyes of the mul titude, assembled for the celebration of the Feast; and that upon many individuals of that multitude, who had not before had any opportunity of seeing and hearing our Lord, they were powerful enough to produce a be lief in His name. Now of these miracles, as it would seem neither few in number nor y St. John ii. 1. 11. E 50 SERMON II. inconsiderable in weight and influence, no hint is given, no trace is observable, in the three earlier Evangelists. They again, on their part, agree in indicating miracles, con cerning which St. John is altogether silent. A remarkable instance occurs in that passage of the History, out of which the words of the text are taken. St. Matthew and St. Mark report, as distinctly as St. Luke, the cure at Capernaum, of Simon's wife's mother, who had been taken with a great fever; and the three Evangelists follow up this narrative with equivalent statements, although conveyed in different terms, concerning the number and variety of the gracious interpositions, with which the people of Capernaum were in dulged. Their grateful sentiments and suit able behaviour, on this occasion, appear to have entitled them to such indulgence ; since St. Luke informs us that they " sought Jesus " and came unto Him and stayed Him that " he should not depart from them \" Of the particular incidents, which thus won the affections of these warm hearted and honest inhabitants of Capernaum, we have no other account than that, which is to be gathered from the following notices. " When the even " was come, they brought unto Him many, z St. Luke iv. 42. SERMON II. 51 " that were possessed with Devils : and He cast " out the spirits, with His word, and healed " all that were sick*." "At even, when the " sun did set, they brought unto Him all that " were diseased and them that were possessed " with devils ; and all the city was gathered " together at the door. And He healed many " that were sick of divers diseases and cast " out many Devils b." Such are the accordant testimonies of St. Matthew and St. Mark, with reference to the circumstances, of which St. Luke observes : " c Now when the sun was "setting" — probably when the rest of the Sabbath was over and another day, according to the Jewish mode of calculation, was be ginning — "all they that had any sick with " divers diseases brought them unto Him ; " and He laid His hands on every one of " them and healed themd." Can these inti mations possibly convey less than an assur ance of our blessed Lord's performance of unrecorded miracles, many in number, and various, in character ? — The very next stage in His life of beneficence is as plainly marked by the same distinguishing features. In His first journey through the whole of Gali lee, He is represented as " healing all man- a St. Matt. viii. 16. b St. Mark i. 32. c St. Luke iv. 40. d Note V. E 2 52 SERMON II. " ner of sickness and all manner of disease " among the people. And His fame went " throughout all Syria, and they brought " unto Him all sick people that were taken " with divers diseases and torments and those " which were possessed with Devils and those " which were lunatick and those that had the " palsy, and He healed them e." At a later period of His ministry, upon His temporary retirement from the attacks of the Pharisees and Herodians, He could secure the privacy He sought only by ordering that a small ship should wait on Him ; " because of the mul- " titude, lest they should throng Him ; for " He had healed many ; insomuch that they " pressed upon Him for to touch Him, as " many as had plagues f." Nor was He con tent with one circuit of the whole country of Galilee : on yet another occasion of a like cir cuit to that already noticed, He again accom panied " the preaching of the Gospel of the " Kingdom, with the healing of every sickness, " and every disease among the peoples." It was in the same region that He afterwards drew universal attention ; and " whithersoever " He entered, into villages or cities or coun- " try, they laid their sick in the streets and « St. Matt. iv. 23, 24. f St. Mark iii. 9, 10. s St. Matt. ix. 35. SERMON II. 53 " besought Him that they might touch, if it " were but the border of His garment : and " as many as touched Him were made whole11." And, once more, St. Matthew relates that, when He had " gone up into the mountain of " Galilee, and had sat down there, great mul- " titudes came unto Him, having with them " those that were lame, blind, dumb, maimed " and many others, and cast them down at " Jesus' feet; and He healed them1." There are two passages that ought to be added to those, which have been already quoted. Both come from the Gospel according to St. John. Among the details of the occurrences of the Feast of Tabernacles, at which our Lord was present in the last year of His ministry, it is men tioned that " many of the people believed on " Him and said : When Christ cometh, will " He do more miracles than these which this " man hath done15?" This allusion to mira cles wrought and to the effects produced by them, although they have been passed over in silence or noticed but slightly and generally by the Sacred Historians, is so much the more interesting, as it plainly shews, in the minds of the Jews, an antecedent expectation of miracles from their Messiah, whenever He should appear, surpassing in number those of h St. Mark vi. 56. ' St. Matt. xv. 29, 30. k St. John vii. 31. E 3 54 SERMON II. any former Prophet; while the sequel as plainly shews, in the breasts of the Pharisees, a persuasion, which they were at once reluc tant to own and unable to disguise, that, in the instance of Jesus of Nazareth, such ante cedent expectation — an expectation, which they had themselves cherished and which they had doubtless taken pains to encourage in others, as furnishing a criterion of any claim to the rank and title ofthe Christ — was completely fulfilled. Alarmed lest a claim, thus support ed on their own favourite principles, should be universally allowed, "they sent officers to " take our Lord1" — upon whose return to them, they had the mortification of hearing the memorable answer, " Never man spake " like this man ;" — and of learning that His words of grace and wisdom were in harmo nious co-operation with His mighty deeds, towards the increase of His influence and the discomfiture of their attempts. — The testi mony of St. John, at the close of his Gospel, is too striking to be omitted. It is with espe cial reference to the actions of our Lord after His resurrection that this Evangelist remarks: " Many other signs truly did Jesus in the " presence of His disciples, which are not " written in this book"1 ;"— but it would seem as i St. John vii. 32, 46. m gti j^ xx q0> 31 SERMON II. 55 if a review of the whole career of His Master had induced him, shortly after to add : "There " are also many other things, which Jesus " did, the which if they should be written " every one, I suppose that even the world " itself could not contain the Books that " should be written"." The principle of se lection, which guided St. John, had guided his brother-Evangelists also : " These are " written, that ye might believe that Jesus is " the Christ, the Son of God ; and that, be- " lieving, ye might have life through His " name." For all purposes of reasonable in vestigation — for every end of entire convic tion — a sufficient number of miracles have been related in detail. The rest are briefly and summarily reported ; yet not even so will they fail of their suitable effect, if, by reason of their number and variety, they lead us to discover fresh and confirming indications that, in the Person of our Saviour Christ resided and was exerted, a Power properly Divine — that to " Him, God gave not the Spirit by " measure"." The mighty works, which dis played themselves in Him, were not occa sional and extraordinary efforts, called forth by peculiar and pressing emergencies; they were by no means studiously accommodated, in » St. John xxi. 25. ° St. John iii. 34. E 4 56 SERMON II. their circumstances of time and place, to the sole end of manifesting openly His preten sions and of shewing publicly the firm foun dation, on which those pretensions rested. Illustrating and exemplifying the Divine at tribute of mercy p, they found their way into every department of human want and woe — into the solitude of the desert, and the retire ment of domestic life, as well as into the busy scenes of the occupations, the pleasures and the cares of man. They occurred with a fre quency which imparts to them an air of na turalness ; they were marked by what we may be permitted to call a, facility of performance, which implies that He, who performed them, was exerting not a delegated and interrupted but a native, inherent and ever-present ability. The suffering Son of man abstained indeed from such use of His power as would have relieved His own wants, soothed His own sor rows, prevented or removed His own trials. The abstinence was voluntary ; and had re spect to the ends of His humiliation; as ap peared in that moment of extreme necessity, when, with a calm dignity, He checked the too forward zeal of His defender : "Thinkest thou " that I cannot now pray to my Father and " He shall presently give me more than twelve P Note W. SERMON II. 57 " legions of angels ? But how then shall the " Scripture be fulfilled that thus it must be*?" But the benevolent Son of God seldom check ed the free, the liberal effluence of His united Power and goodness, when others were con cerned. If He any where " could not do many " miracles^" it was on account of some pecu liar unworthiness and fault of those, by whom He was surrounded. When He occasionally went beyond the bounds of those districts, to which He chiefly confined His ministry, even on the borders of Tyre and Sidon, it was in vain that He " entered into a house and would " have no man know its." His fame had gone before Him ; and He " could not be hid." In short, from a careful review of the course, which our blessed Lord pursued upon earth ; and from a thoughtful comparison of His mi racles, in respect of variety, frequency and fa cility with the miracles elsewhere related in Holy Scripture to have been achieved for spe cial purposes by God's chosen servants, who were furnished with extraordinary powers ; from such review and comparison, we can scarcely receive any other impression than one of awe and reverence ; feeling that, in the former case, we have been beholding " Him q St. Matt. xxvi. 53, 54. r St. Mark vi. 5. s St. Mark vii. 24. 58 SERMON II. " that" in a high and eminent sense " cometh " from above and therefore is above all ;" — whilst, in the latter case, we have seen them, who, however richly they may have been gifted and endowed, were still " of the earth" — and therefore in their actions, betokening, in their language, " speaking of, the earth*." ( St. John iii. 31. SERMON III. St. John xiv. 10. Selievest thou not that I am in the Father and the Father in me f The words that I speak unto you, I speak not of myself: hut ihe Father that dwelleth in me, He doeth ihe works. OF the numerous appeals, which our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, is reported to have made to His own miracles, in support of the claims that He advanced, one of the most remarkable is contained in the words of the text. They were spoken in the presence of the Eleven Apostles alone, after Judas had already left the " large upper room*," in which he had partaken with his brethren and their common Master, of the last Paschal supper, and in which the rest appear for some time to have lingered, hanging on the lips of that Teacher, to whom they were in the habit of paying a reverential attention. As they lis tened, after the traitor had gone out from their company, Jesus awakened their sur- d St. Mark xiv. 15. 60 SERMON III. prise, by intimating that " now is the Son " of man glorified, and God is glorified in " Himb ;" but immediately baffled their cu riosity and checked each rising hope of that kingdom, on which they loved to dwell, by adding, with an engaging tenderness: " Little " children, yet a little while I am with you. " Ye shall seek me ; and as I said unto the " Jews : Whither I go ye cannot come ; so " now I say to youc." Strange to the appre hensions and unwelcome to the ears of His faithful followers must have been this com munication, respecting His own speedy re moval out of their reach ! And hard was it for them to reconcile the hint given of His approaching glory with a declaration, too plain to be misunderstood, of His departure to a place, whither they themselves should not be able to follow Him ! The language formerly addressed to the Jews, of which our Lord reminded them, and which He in fact repeated, had not probably caused any unea siness in their breasts or involved them in any perplexity ; for such language was per fectly consistent with their opinion and their expectation that, whithersoever their Master might betake Himself, they should still be in attendance on His Person, to fulfil His pur- b St. John xiii. 31. c gti j0^n x^ 33 SERMON III. 61 poses and share His triumphs. But now, they were called to abandon this fondly cherished hope ; and the difficulty of complying with the call is graphically set before us, in St. John's account of the conversation that fol lowed. Simon Peter, with characteristic bold ness and eagerness, sought a satisfactory ex planation by asking : " Lord, whither goest " thoud ?" As the first attempt did not at once succeed, Thomas next seized the occa sion, which our Saviour's condescending manner and soothing discourse quickly af forded, of interposing his less direct ques tion : " Lord, we know not whither thou " goest, and how can we know the way6 ?" And finally, Philip, in the hope of causing some farther light to be thrown over a sub ject, which was still felt to be involved in obscurity, ventured to request : " Lord, shew " us the Father and it sufficeth usf." It was in reply to Philip that the words of the text were spoken ; and they demanded both of Philip and of his companions, a cordial assent to the doctrine of the intimate union of the Son with the Father, on the ground that it was a doctrine, which our Lord had Himself clearly stated to His Apostles; and that to all His statements a Divine sanction was im- d St. John xiii. 36. e St. John xiv. 5. f St. John xiv. 8. 62 SERMON III. parted by the works He had performed — which works, He moreover, on this occasion, in plain and unambiguous terms, described as being the works of the Father — of God in the Person of His Son. " sThe Father that " dwelleth in me, He doeth the works1"." With this assertion is naturally and closely connected the train of reflection, which was begun, in the last, and is to be carried on, in the present, Lecture. Some indications of a Power, truly and properly Divine, were then observed in those circumstances of number and variety, which belong to the miracles of Jesus Christ. I now proceed to notice such farther indications of the same sort as other like circumstances may furnish. Next in order to number and variety, among the particulars distinguishing our Lord's mi racles, may be reckoned the tone of indepen dent authority with which He spake and they were done. Of this circumstance, almost al ways accompanying His works, and of its na tural effect upon the minds of the beholders and hearers, a more suitable instance or a stronger illustration cannot be found, than in the case of the " man with an unclean spi- " rit in the Synagogue of Capernaum'," of g St. John xiv. 10. h N0te X. < St. Mark i. 23. and St. Luke iv. 33. SERMON III. 63 whose deliverance both St. Mark and St. Luke have preserved a memorial. The words of rebuke : " Hold thy peace and come out of " him :" were no sooner uttered than they were followed by the intended result ; and the witnesses " were all amazed, insomuch " that they questioned among themselves, " saying : What thing is this ? what new " doctrine is this ? for with authority com- " mandeth He even the unclean spirits and " they do obey Him ;" or, as St. Luke re ports, "they spake among themselves, saying; " What a word is this ! for with authority " and power He commandeth the unclean " spirits and they come out." The more fa miliar any one becomes with the History of the Old Testament, and with the earliest Annals of the Christian Church, whether those Annals are supplied by the Inspired Scriptures or by the Writings that are near est to them in time and in authority ; the more will he be alive to the existence and sensible of the force and import, of this cha racter of the miraculous agency of our Lord. The most illustrious of the Prophets are seen to have ascribed their extraordinary and su pernatural deeds on all occasions to aid vouchsafed from above, to strength imparted from on high, to power borrowed and derived 64 SERMON III. from the Almighty source alike of wisdom and of power. Moses, the greatest of them all, appears before us every where, through out his astonishing History, as the subordi nate and commissioned agent of the Lord Jehovah. His earnest and pathetic inter cessions in behalf of the stiff-necked and re bellious people, whom he was appointed to guide and govern ; — his severe expostula tions, when they murmured against himself and Aaron : " What are we, that ye murmur " against us ? "' " What are we ? Your mur- " murings are not against us but against the " Lord :" his threatening of awful and im mediate vengeance, to be executed upon Ko rah and his company, which was destined to shew that " the Lord had sent him to do all " these works — for he had not done them of " his own mind™ :" — all these instances ex hibit him in the light of an exalted and highly favoured minister of the Supreme God — yet not more than a minister, openly professing his dependence on that Being, whose servant he was, and ever both speak ing and acting according to directions, which he states himself to have received ; and for the production of results, which, in the name of the Lord, he had foretold. Si- 1 Exodus xvi. 7, 8. m Numbers xvi. 28. SERMON III. 65 milar remarks may be applied to the cases of those distinguished Prophets under the earlier Dispensation, who came after Moses, and were, like him, endued with miraculous powers. They implore assistance suited to the immediate occasion of their interference ; they announce what they are about to do; they speak of that, which they have done, not as their own achievement, but as the sure token of the Divine presence with them and of the Divine sanction of their messages. If, in some few instances, there seems, at first sight, to be no express reference to agency beyond that of the Prophet himself, a close inspection of the Sacred narrative will shew that even these instances are strictly in keep ing with the general tenour of the History, in the midst of which they stand ; and that the attendant circumstances of the scene are always such as to imply — often such as clearly to indicate the acknowledged subordination and dependence of instruments, that are but human, although employed on special occa sions in super-human efforts ". In the very opening of the History of the Christian Church, after our Lord's resurrection ; in the first beginning of the exercise of that power, which was granted to the Apostles after the n Note Y. 66 SERMON III. gift of the Holy Ghost on the day of Pente cost, we are indeed informed that " many " wonders and signs were done by the Apo- " sties0;" but the earliest details, with which we are furnished, on this subject, are given, as if with an express design of setting before us, in a clear light, the secondary and deriva tive nature of their extraordinary powers. I allude to the instance of the lame man, whom " Peter and John saw at the Beautiful gate " ofthe Temple p." It was "in the name of " Jesus Christ of Nazareth" that Peter bade him " rise up and walk." For himself and his companion he presently, before the people, " running together and greatly wondering," disclaimed the credit of the miracle : " Why " look ye so earnestly on us, as though, by " our own power or holiness, we had made " this man to walk ? The God of Abraham, " and of Isaac and of Jacob, the God of our " Fathers, hath glorified His Son, Jesus ; — " whose name, through faith in His name, hath " made this man strong." And, on the fol lowing day, when summoned from the im prisonment, in which they had been held during the night, to reply publicly to the question : " By what power or by what name, " have ye done this ?" Peter declared : " Ye 0 Acts ii. 43. p Acts iii. 2. SERMON III. 67 " rulers of the people and elders of Israel, if " we this day be examined of the good deed " done to the impotent man, by what means " he is made whole ; be it known unto you " all, and to all the people of Israel that by *' tbe name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, " whom ye crucified, whom God raised from " the dead, even by Him doth this man stand " here before you whole 1." On being dis missed with threatenings, they " went to their " own company and reported what the Chief " Priests and elders had said unto them." Then all " lifted up their voice to God with " one accord r," in the words of that prayer, which St. Luke has carefully preserved and of which the conclusion is as follows : " And " now, Lord behold their threatenings ; and " grant unto Thy servants that, with all bold- " ness, they may speak Thy word, by stretch- " ing forth Thy hand to heal ; and that signs " and wonders may be done by the name of " Thy holy Child, Jesus." In the sequel of the Apostolical History we read the recorded answer to this prayer; marked, however, in almost all its leading portions, by invocations as loud, by acknowledgments of dependence as clear and open, by references to aid from Heaven as decided, as those on which our q Acts iv. 7, 8, 9. ' Acts iv. 24. F 2 68 SERMON III. attention has now been fixed s. A slight ac quaintance with the remains of Christian an tiquity and with the notices, therein con veyed, of miraculous agency, continued in the Church beyond the life time of the Apostles themselves, may suffice to assure every in quirer that Martyrs and Confessors always owned, in the lowly temper and in the very language of their spiritual Fathers and their Predecessors, that they were but humble in struments for the display of such signs and wonders as God was pleased to shew forth in them. I insist not (for it is not to my pre sent purpose to do so) on the testimony often borne by the inspired Apostles and their im mediate successors to the superiority of our Lord over themselves, by the manner, in which they connect all the power they either had or expected to have, with His high and Holy name 4 ; — that name, " which is above " every name u :" 1 am not now at liberty to remark more than that between Him and them, as workers of similar and equal mira cles, a distinction is observable, in respect of independent authority on His side; and of continual and avowed reliance upon God, on their's. Review the pages of the Gospel His tory ; and you will perceive our Lord acting s Note Z. t Note AA. u phj], ;;_ 9 SERMON III. 69 in His own person and in His own name. He holds nature and Hell under His control and regulates both according to His good pleasure. The elements are obedient to His voice ; diseases and infirmities give way and disappear at His bidding ; evil spirits, awed at His presence, are expelled by His com mand. " I will — be thou clean x" — " Arise, " and take up thy bed and go thy way into " thine house y" — " Come out of the man, " thou unclean spirit z" — " Damsel, I say unto " thee : Arise a :" such are some examples of the forms of address that accompanied the performance of our Saviour's miracles. Rarely and for reasons of admonition or in struction, which are either at first sight ob vious or may easily be conjectured, He was pleased to use the intervention of such means as would have proved altogether inefficacious, if He had not chosen and adapted them to serve His purposes b. Since the choice and adaptation of means are evidently and en tirely His own, the comparatively slow and gradual process of cure, in these few instances, interferes not with our view of the independ ence of His power on any source or origin beyond Himself. On the contrary, it rather x St. Matt. viii. 3. v St. Mark ii. 11. z St. Mark v. 8. a St. Mark v. 41. b Note BB. F 3 70 SERMON III. indicates, in perfect harmony with such view, that, as to the methods of exerting and dis playing His power, He was likewise free from all restrictions. Sometimes, in action or in word ; sometimes, in both, He made an ex press and open reference to Heaven and to His Father ; but of such reference, in con nection with any of His miracles, the same account may be given, which He Himself gave of the voice from Heaven, granted in answer to the prayer offered in the prospect of His approaching end : " This voice came " not because of me, but for your sakes c." In like manner, of our blessed Lord's ad dresses to Heaven, when they most resemble petitions for support and aid, may it be, with truth, remarked, as indeed on one occasion by a Saint and Bishop of the early Church it has been beautifully remarked, that " our " Lord prays not with a view to propitiate " the Father or to gain the Divine help for " Himself; but for the purpose of procuring " these blessings for us. For although the " Father hath put all things in the power of " the Son, yet does the Son, in order that He " may complete all that belongs to Him in " His form of man and because He is our ad- c St. John xii. 30. SERMON III. 71 " vocate, think proper to entreat the Father " in our behalf d." A particular instance will however best il lustrate this subject ; and I shall select that one, which, of all the instances that occur, is for various reasons most deserving of our no tice. You will anticipate my mention of the raising of Lazarus. In that moment, when " they had taken away the stone, from the " place e," where the dead was laid ; and when the anxious breast of " Martha, the sister of " him that was dead" — was disturbed by con flicting emotions — by a reluctance to expose the mouldering remains of the object of her love and a faint hope that her lost brother might still be restored to her arms — in that moment of suspense — of deep and overwhelm ing interest, " Jesus lifted up His eyes and " said : Father, I thank thee that Thou hast " heard me. And I knew that Thou hearest " me always; but because of the people, which " stand by, I said it, that they may believe " that Thou hast sent me. And when He " had thus spoken, He cried with a loud voice : " Lazarus, come forth." Is it the customary strain of invocation, which we hear on this occasion f ? Is the act of worship performed, d Note CC. e St. John xi. 41. f Note DD. F 4 72 SERMON III. is the accompanying language spoken, after the usual form and manner of addresses to Heaven on the part of God's most highly favoured servants — of Abraham, His friend, or of David, the man after His own heart? Are we not rather led here to contemplate a claim, urged and allowed, as of right and title, to the Father's ever-present aid and in fluence ? Do we not find a strong and em phatic statement, explanatory of the slightest appearance of inconsistency with such claim? And are we not, by the authoritative terms of the command, which follows, irresistibly carried back to the doctrine previously deli vered by our Lord of an unity of action, that cannot imply less than an unity of nature, subsisting between the Father and the Son ? " Verily, verily, I say unto you : The Son can " do nothing of Himself but what He seeth " the Father do ; for what things soever He " doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise. " As the Father raiseth up the dead and " quickeneth them ; even so the Son quicken- " eth whom He will." " Verily, verily, I say " unto you : The hour is coming and now is, " when the dead shall hear the voice of the " Son of God and they that hear shall live ; " for as the Father hath life in Himself, so SERMON III. 73 " hath He given to the Son to have life in " Himself §." It was to the awakening voice of the Son that Lazarus, already slumbering in the grave, was called to listen ; it was the same powerful voice, which His spirit, al ready gone into the unseen regions, instantly obeyed. Nor can there be discovered in this example, when it has been thoroughly consi dered and is rightly understood, any real in consistency with what may be elsewhere ob served, of the independent authority, which raised our Saviour above all other workers of miracles ; and which, as often as it is ob served, may prove for every thoughtful mind an indication of God made manifest in Him. The Gospel miracles supply a still farther indication of the same sort, by the disclosure, which they make, of our Lord's knowledge, in connection with His power. We seldom have an account of His interposition in fa vour of the suffering and the sorrowful, given at any considerable length, which does not inform us of His discernment ofthe thoughts and feelings of the objects of His care and bounty. We are often led to notice that He was aware of the moral condition — that He adverted to the spiritual qualifications and necessities of those who approached Him as s St. John v. 19, &c. 74 SERMON III. suppliants. It is perfectly true that an abi lity to penetrate into the secret motives and hidden intentions of their fellow-creatures may be, as it has sometimes been, imparted by that God, who searcheth the hearts and trieth the reins of the children of men, to His inspired servants ; but, in all instances, with which we are acquainted, of human be ings thus favoured, the gift has been occa sional, in point of time, and limited in de gree. Our Lord, on the other hand, never appears to have been left destitute of such power, from the commencement of His min istry. Without consulting how He may dis play a faculty so wonderful, He continually avails Himself of it, not in working His mi racles only, but in His general intercourse with men. My present remarks are however to be confined to His miracles alone ; and of them it may be stated that they both directly and indirectly shew knowledge, like that which brought home conviction to the understand ing and the heart of the woman of Samaria, when, after His gracious conversation with her, " she left her waterpot and went her way " into the city and saith to the men : Come, " see a man, which told me all things that " ever I did. Is not this the Christ11?" — It h St. John iv. 28, 29. SERMON III. 75 will be remembered that the faith of the ap plicants for His help is put prominently for ward as the never failing plea in their fa vour; but this faith, often indicated by no outward signs of speech or action, was dis cernible to His penetrating eye alone. The absence again of faith — an absence of which none but Himself was conscious, stayed His bounteous hand and at least for a while sus pended His beneficent exertions. How af fecting is the instance, which the three earlier Evangelists relate but which of the three St. Mark most fully describes, of that woman, who, during twelve years of sad disease, had " suffered many things of many Physicians " and had spent all that she had and was no- " thing bettered but rather grew worse ' ! " She had heard of Jesus ; she beheld the crowd, pressing around Him, as He was pro ceeding towards the house of Jairus, at the request of that afflicted father, whose " little " daughter was then lying at the point of " death ;" she felt that the moment was fa vourable for her trial of an experiment, which might possibly prove successful, and on which, at all events, she could venture, without dan ger of stopping the progress of our Lord or ' St. Matt. ix. 20. St. Mark v. 26. St. Luke viii. 43. 76 SERMON III. interfering in any degree with His execution of that purpose of kindness, on which He was intent. Accordingly " she came in the press behind " and touched the hem of His garment ; for " she said within herself" — it was her secret reflection, to which she gave no utterance — " if I may touch but His clothes, I shall be " whole." The instant effect of her act was the recovery of health. Who can fully enter into her emotion, when " she felt in her body " that she was healed of the plague," that had tormented her so long? Neither her person nor her behaviour — neither the in ternal resolution she had formed nor the steps she had taken to carry that resolution into action — nothing in her circumstances or character had escaped the notice of our Lord, who, having first secured the atten tion of his disciples by a question asked and a reply drawn from them, " looked round " about to see her that had done this thing." It was doubtless when His eye at once fixed upon her that " she saw that she was not hid." In her alarm, she perceived and felt the ma jesty of that piercing eye ; but overlooked the mildness of compassion and of mercy, with which it was directed towards her. " Fearing " and trembling, she came and fell down be- SERMON III. 77 " fore Him ; and in the presence of all the " people, told Him all the truth." Little was she prepared for the soothing and encou raging language, which immediately reached her ears and gladdened her heart : " Daugh- " ter, be of good comfort ; thy faith hath "made thee whole: go in peace." To her unspeakable joy she found that she was con firmed in a sure possession of the blessing, which she had received ; and she must have taken her departure, well persuaded that her Benefactor had been no stranger to her in most thoughts — to the hopes, which she had scarcely allowed herself to cherish ! In the case ofthe " Greek woman, a Syrophe- " nician by nation," who " besought our Lord " that He would cast forth a Devil out of her " young daughter k," is afforded a touching, although somewhat different, proof of His exact and perfect knowledge of the moral condition and circumstances of such as ap proached Him. Here the narrative is so con structed both by St. Matthew and by St. Mark, but more especially by the former Evange list, as to carry with it a somewhat unusual air of reluctance on the part of Jesus to lis ten to the petition urged. When however we reach its close, and learn that our Lord, at k St. Matt. xv. 21 ; St. Mark vii. 24. 78 SERMON III. last " answered and said unto her : O woman, " great is thy faith : be it unto thee even as " thou wilt" — we look back upon the pre ceding incidents and gain a new insight into their meaning. They now seem to have been designed rather to display than to explore that faith, which our Saviour Himself from the first saw, and which he had resolved both to commend and to reward. He perceived that this believing Gentile had a firmness of mind and a strength of confidence, which could bear the tentative treatment He was pleased to apply to her case ; and of that treatment the end was, not to repel her, but to shew openly to His disciples, still narrow- minded and fettered by Jewish prejudices, the real nature of those qualities, which, whe ther in Jew or in Gentile, would win His favour and engage His compassion. There is one remarkable feature of the mi racle of healing, wrought at Capernaum upon the man, sick of the palsy, who was " let down, " through the tiling, with his couch into the "midst before Jesus1," which is entitled to our especial regard on the present occasion. The faith, not of the sick man only, but of those also who had brought him, and who had shewn their confidence in our Lord's power 1 St. Matt. ix. 2; St. Mark ii. 3 ; St. Luke v. 18. SERMON III. 79 and goodness by the expedient to which they had had recourse, pleaded successfully their cause, and drew forth an answer to their ap plication, which they could not but under stand — which the sick man himself soon ex perienced, to be favourable, although it was couched in unexpected terms : " Son, be of " good cheer ; thy sins are forgiven thee !" The phrase gave quick offence to the Scribes and Pharisees, " sitting" in the house, who began to " reason in their hearts : Why doth " this man thus speak blasphemies ? Who can " forgive sins but God only ?" To these rea sonings, before they had been uttered in words, our Lord replied : " Why reason ye " these things in your hearts ? Whether is it " easier to say to the sick of the palsy : Thy " sins be forgiven thee ; or to say, Arise and " take up thy bed and walk ?" In order to give them a sensible proof that, in His use of them, these two forms of expression were equi valent, He condescended to substitute the latter for the former ; and thus made the re sult, which afterwards took place, agree with the letter of the words He spake. " He saith " to the sick of the palsy : I say unto thee : " Arise and take up thy bed and go thy way " into thine house." When the sick man im mediately obeyed, " rose up before them, took 80 SERMON III. " up that whereon he lay and departed to his " own house, glorifying God," a more than common astonishment was felt and expressed — an astonishment, which was doubtless in part owing to the demonstration afforded of the power of the Son of man upon earth to forgive sins. Again, must the Scribes and Pharisees have questioned — again must the multitudes have asked with anxious curiosity : " Who is " this, that undertakes to forgive sins ? Who " is this extraordinary, this mysterious Per- " sonage, that claims authority alike in the " moral and in the natural world, and by His " manifest and undeniable control over the " latter, asserts and establishes His right of " exercising similar control over the former?" It must have been in attempting to answer' these questions as well as in observing the miracle wrought that " they were all amazed " and glorified God and were filled with fear, " saying, We have seen strange things to day." They had beheld, under the form and in the likeness of a fellow-creature, a Being, who could discern the secret sorrow of a troubled conscience, and who was careful to allay and soothe that sorrow by words of forgiveness and of peace, before He proceeded to restore activity to the palsied limb and strength to the enfeebled body. With their thankful ac- SERMON III. 81 knowledgments to "God, which had given " such power unto men," must have mingled some latent apprehension that the great Pro phet, at whose words and deeds they mar velled, would eventually prove Himself to be more than man". And thus, upon an attentive survey of the miracles of Jesus Christ, we have observed, as belonging to them, several characteristic circumstances, which plainly distinguish them from the wonderful works of the most emi nent of Prophets and Apostles ; of Saints and Martyrs. In their number and variety ; in the independent authority, with which they were done; in the knowledge, by which they were accompanied; we have found what we may venture to call some indications of the Divine nature of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ. A serious and devout study of the Gospel narratives will furnish many farther illustrations of each of these topics ; and the brief remarks on the present occasion made, indicating the method of investigation to be pursued, may serve to fix thought steadily on the valuable results, to which inquiries of this kind may lead. What then, it will be asked, are those results? What is the ob ject to be gained — what is the advantage " Note EE. G 82 SERMON III. to be derived — from the review, in which we have been engaged ? Is it expected that the miracles of our Lord, marked by the characteristics which have been assigned to them, are to have, in comparison with the miracles of other messengers and ministers of God — a force of evidence, peculiar and distinct in kind or nature ? Certainly not. It has been already declared that Miracles by whatever agents wrought, whether by the Son of God or by the creatures of God of lower rank, whether by angelic beings or by men, are, in respect of evidence, essentially the same ; and accomplish one and the same end of affording proof of the Divine aid or at least of the Divine permission — which per mission, under the circumstances of appeal to them, as tokens of the Divine presence, is equivalent to a Divine Testimony — a Divine sanction and support of those who work them. And, accordingly, the miracles of our blessed Saviour have been clearly seen to effect their purpose of evidence in His favour, previously to and independently of all dis closure of the doctrine of His proper Di vinity. Is it then intended to vindicate for the miracles of Jesus Christ a superiority over other miracles in degree or manner of influ- SERMON III. 83 ence on the human mind ? As far indeed as the conviction of the understanding is con cerned, the question of greater or less does not admit of being applied to the subject of miraculous agency. Almighty power is to be regarded as the true — the only primary source, of all real miracles; and we are to remember that where Almighty Power, whe ther it be original or delegated, is in opera tion, all obstacles disappear and degrees of difficulty are unknown. But it is conceived that the miracles of Christ, when contem plated as the interpositions of God in the Person of His Son, may gain and keep a firmer hold on the heart — on the affections and the will — than any miracles of inferior — of created Beings have gained and kept, or are capable of gaining and keeping. And it is with a view to such use and application of them that they have now been considered. Perceiving in their incidents and often in the minute features of detail, which the Evan gelists have simply but beautifully drawn, many distinct notices of a Divine Majesty and glory, we pause and seek relief for the sudden emotion of our souls, by exclaiming with the holy Patriarch : " Surely the Lord " is in this place and I knew it not"." But n Genesis xxviii. 16. G 2 84 SERMON III. we have no sooner discovered and ascertained the fact, which was at first calculated to startle and alarm us, than we are enabled to derive from it support and consolation. We behold Divine perfections accommodated to our weakness, by their union with the mild est and the most winning of human virtues. We see before our eyes, in condescending in tercourse with men of like passions with our selves, the co-eternal and co-equal Son of that exalted Being, whom we are taught to regard and commanded to imitate as " kind " unto the unthankful and to the evil0" — " merciful" — " making His Sun to rise on " the evil and on the good ; and sending rain " on the just and on the unjustP." The idea of the goodness of God thus becomes inse parably associated with the notion of His power ; nor need we any longer, whilst we witness the Divine bounty, dispensed by our Redeemer's gracious hands, " shudder at a " power, which can confer benefits of such " mighty importances." Through the scenes of the Gospel History, we form a lively image of God present in the world, which by His Word He created and which by the same Word He governs ; those scenes we learn to represent to our minds, as if we had ourselves 0 St. Luke vi. 35, 36. P St. Matt. v. 45. q Note FF. SERMON III. 85 been spectators of them ; and by our Lord's own authority, we are encouraged to believe that we have in them a deep and lasting in terest. He is not indeed, as man, accessible to men ; for His extraordinary interference in our behalf we are not, in any case, war ranted in looking ; but we discover that among the ends to be answered by the record of His miracles, one was to teach us that we may depend on His ever-present, although secret and unseen aid — that we may be per suaded of His sympathy with our sufferings, both mental and bodily — that we may per ceive how He enters into the particulars of our condition, makes gracious allowance for the difficulties that beset us in our way to Heaven, pities our errors and pardons our sins. The abodes, which He blessed with His presence, were like our own homes ; — darkened by sorrow and defiled with sin ; and He chose to enter them, for the benevo lent purpose of banishing sorrow and coun teracting sin, the baneful cause and the pro lific parent of sorrow. It is in short our ex alted privilege, by gaining an intimate ac quaintance with the particulars even of the miracles of the Gospel History, to realise the presence of God with ourselves and to en- c6urage a firm expectation of help and g3 86 SERMON III. strength from His sustaining influence. While we are permitted to see the Son in His deeds of united power and mercy, we shall thankfully own that we have seen the Father alsor; and the bright but softened beams of that glorious vision will for us dis pel the clouds, which must otherwise have hidden from our view the Supreme Source of truth and purity. 1 St. John xiv. 9. SERMON IV. St. Mark iv. 33 and 34 (in part.) And with many such Parables spake He the word unto them, as they were able to hear it. But without a Parable spake He not unto them. F ROM a consideration of the miracles of our Lord, I pass to a survey of the moral and religious lessons, which He taught. Here also may be opened to every mind, duly pre pared by a sincere love of truth and good ness for such an inquiry, many important and highly interesting views of the wisdom, the purity and the mercy of our Divine In structor. I must not however enter upon this division of my subject, without disclaim ing the intention of seeking, in such distin guishing peculiarities ofthe doctrines of Jesus Christ as are about to be noticed, whether such peculiarities belong to the matter or to the manner of His Discourses, any direct and primary proofs of that nature, in respect of g 4 88 SERMON IV. which He stands exalted above all other Teachers, whom the world has seen. Some of our Lord's doctrines are indeed so circum stanced as to furnish proofs of His proper Divinity. His own assertions on the subject, clear and undisputed, when taken in connec tion with the miraculous sanctions, by which they were supported, are evidently and have already been observed to be, sufficient for the purpose. On these however I do not intend to dwell. They belong not to my present Design, which is limited to indirect and, as it were, incidental notices and illustrations of the Divine nature of Jesus Christ. It may then be granted that, when regarded in the light of a Moral and Religious Teacher merely, our Lord is not necessarily seen to be Divine; that He has not brought with Him from Heaven any discoveries of Moral or Religious truth, that can serve for inde pendent and self-evident tokens of His lofty origin. It has often been asserted that the department of Moral truth admits not of dis coveries properly so called. The assertion is one, which, after some explanation and under some restriction, may be granted. In the de partment of religious truth, the case is dif ferent : here it has been perceived and is al lowed that there exists not only a possibility, SERMON IV. 89 but a previous likelihood, of what may be strictly considered and justly termed disco veries. Such subjects as lie beyond the reach of the eye of human understanding — the manner of the Divine existence, the course of the Divine dispensations, the final destiny of man — such subjects as these form the ap propriate matters of an express Revelation. The disclosures made respecting them are discoveries, because these are subjects, which, without Revelation, must have remained for ever hidden. And as, from these discoveries once made, new* duties immediately result ; as, more over, by means of the same discoveries the foundations of Moral science are more broadly and more firmly laid, the force of moral mo tives greatly strengthened and a flood of light thrown over the whole field of Moral specu lation ; it is evident that the assertion, lately noticed, requires to be restricted and quali fied by a reference to both these considera tions; for duties, previously recognised, are thus seen to be invested with a character that may entitle them to be called in some sort new; and although of duties confessedly new it may be contended that even they flow from general moral principles, prior to the disclosures, which rather make manifest and 90 SERMON IV. develop than create their obligatian ; it must, after all, be conceded that these duties, in some sort, partake of that character of disco veries, which belongs to the religious truths, whereon they depend. Yet even of religious truths and duties, thus allowed to be of the nature of discoveries, it is undeniable that, in and of themselves, they are neither well- suited nor in fact sufficient to shew to what rank or order of Beings he who communi cates them is to be assigned. So far as their direct, single and uncombined testimony is concerned, he may be Divine, Angelic, or hu man. Thus, it might undoubtedly have pleas ed Almighty God to convey a knowledge of the most sublime and most awful verities of our Holy Religion by other messengers and ministers than His only begotten and well- beloved Son. Since, however, the method, ac tually chosen, has been one of condescending grace and goodness ; since He, " who is the " image of the invisible God, the first-born " of every creature ; by whom were all things " created that are in Heaven and that are in " earth — visible and invisible — whether they " be thrones or dominions or principalities or " powers — who is before all things and by " whom all things consist""— since a Being, a Col. i. 15, 16, 17. SERMON IV. 91 thus great and glorious, has stooped to be come our Teacher, we may surely expect, in listening to His instructions, to catch occa sionally the sound of more than mortal voice, and to receive not unfrequently some deep impressions of awe and wonder in His pre sence. His " word," or " Himself, the Word " of God," as we may rather choose to under stand the passage, " quick and powerful and " sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing " even to the dividing asunder of soul and " spirit and of the joints and marrow," is likely to prove " a discerner of the thoughts " and intents of our heart." — " Naked and " opened unto the eyes of Him, with whom " we have to dob," we shall be conscious, in our own breasts, that " He needed not," even in the day of His humiliation, " that any " should testify of man ; for He knew what " was in man c." We may realise that effect of His teaching which St. Luke has described, when he states that " Jesus taught in the " Synagogues of Galilee, being glorified of " all d." We may hope to gain, from a grow ing acquaintance with His Discourses, a fixed ness of purpose in His Service and a steadi ness of attachment to His adorable Person, which no earthly power shall be able to *> Heb. iv. 12, 13. c St. John ii. 25. d gt, Luke iv. 15. 92 SERMON IV. shake. And, if temptations sometimes harass our minds or momentary doubts intrude, we shall hear His gentle expostulation : " Will " ye also go away ?" and shall learn firmly to answer : " Lord, to whom shall wTe go ? " Thou hast the words of eternal life : and " we believe and are sure that Thou art that " Christ, the Son of the Living God6." The Parables, spoken by our Lord, form a considerable portion of His recorded teach ing ; and on many accounts, demand the earnest attention of all, who are desirous of understanding and profiting by the lessons of His ministry. The word Parable, as it is, in its largest meaning, employed in the New Testament, comprehends several varieties of illustrative and figurative language, for which the Art of Rhetoric supplies several distinct appellations. Commonly however the name is, in our minds, associated with that complete and most interesting form of illustration, which has been called Fable or Apologue. Accordingly, when we say that the Gospels abound with Parables, we speak of narratives of this kind ; entire, consisting of parts, inge niously contrived, skilfully arranged, united into one whole ; and moreover so managed, either as to the occasions or as to the manner e St. John vi. 67, 68, 69. SERMON IV. 93 of their delivery, as to suggest some import ant moral or spiritual lesson. It was with many such Parables as these that St. Mark, in the words of the text, represents our Sa viour to have spoken the word publicly unto the people ; it was on such Parables that the same Evangelist states Him to have founded His private Discourses, uttered in the hearing of His Disciples alone. The use of such Para bles as these however had not marked the be ginning of His ministry. From the first in deed, His plain, simple and authoritative doc trine was variegated and adorned by apt similitudes ; by lively comparisons ; by illus trations, drawn from the occurrences of daily life and the circumstances of surrounding scenes — illustrations always graceful, digni fied and forcible — familiar, without being low — neither far-fetched nor too obvious. Who, that has read and studied the Sermon on the Mount, can be at a loss for the means of verifying this statement ? Who can follow Jesus to the end of the sayings, which He, on that occasion, spake, without being astonished at the beauty, as well as the authority, of His manner of teaching? Notwithstanding this admission, it would seem that set and formal Parables — Parables, in that limited sense, in which we usually employ the word — were not 94 SERMON IV. spoken by our Lord, until the first year of His public life had been accomplished, and the second had already made some progress. This fact, in itself not undeserving of notice for those, who would trace the order of His proceedings, naturally leads us to inquire what were the views and motives, which in fluenced Jesus Christ, when He at length had recourse to the method of instruction, that afterwards holds so prominent a place in the Records of His ministry ? St. Matthew informs us that ancient Prophecy was thus fulfilled : " All these things spake Jesus unto " the multitude in Parables ; and without a " Parable spake He not unto them ; that it " might be fulfilled, which was spoken by the " Prophet, saying: I will open my mouth in " Parables; I will utter things, which have " been kept secret from the foundation of the " world f." A distinguishing feature ofthe pro mised Messiah's method of teaching, which the Prophetic Volume had long before indi cated, is observed to mark the instructions of Jesus of Nazareth and coincides with other proofs in establishing His claims to the cha racter and the office of the Christ. But we naturally desire and may innocently seek, a farther degree of satisfaction on this subject. f St. Matt. xiii. 34, 35. Psalm lxxviii. 2. SERMON IV. 95 The occasion of our Lord's first use of Para bles, to which the text relates, drew forth the very question that we are inclined to ask ; and to the question Jesus Himself vouch safed to return a gracious answer. To the Evangelist, St. Matthew, we are indebted for the full details of the incident. " And the disciples came and said unto " Him : Why speakest thou unto them in " Parables ? He answered and said unto " them : Because it is given unto you to " know the mysteries of the Kingdom of " Heaven but to them it is not given. For " whosoever hath, to him shall be given ; and " he shall have more abundance ; but whoso- " ever hath not, from him shall be taken " away even that he hath. Therefore speak " I to them in Parables, because they, seeing, " see not ; and hearing they hear not, neither " do they understand. And in them is ful- " filled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith : " By hearing, ye shall hear and shall not un- " derstand ; and seeing, ye shall see and shall " not perceive ; for this people's heart is wax- " ed gross and their ears are dull of hearing " and their eyes they have closed, lest at any " time they should see with their eyes and " hear with their ears and should understand " with their heart and should be converted 96 SERMON IV. " and I should heal them. But blessed are " your eyes, for they see ; and your ears ; for " they hear. For, verily, I say unto you that " many Prophets and righteous men have de- " sired to see those things, which ye see and " have not seen them ; and to hear those " things, which ye hear, and have not heard " themg!" In our Saviour's account of this whole matter, as it is here recorded, a clear distinc tion is made between the case of the multi tude and that of His disciples. He undoubt edly addressed the latter, as entitled to a pri vilege and enjoying an advantage, of which the former were destitute ; and He repre sented that privilege and that advantage to be the result of opportunities improved, of previous benefits accepted and employed, and thus, by a diligent use, augmented and mul tiplied. He plainly referred to the course of His preceding Ministry and willingly con fessed that, in the instance of His disciples, the plan of teaching, which He had adopted and hitherto pursued, had not proved vain or ineffectual. But even for the multitude, justly chargeable with inattention, neglect and guilty indifference, His words breathe a s St. Matt. xiii. 10—17. SERMON IV. 97 tender spirit of mercy and of condescending kindness. He is pleased to say that He has chosen a new method of instruction for their sake. He saw that Parables were well suited to their circumstances and likely to rouse them from the torpor, into which they had sunk ; — calculated to unclose their eyes and unstop their ears ; to open the avenues of ac cess to their understanding and their hearts; and to convey into their souls, labouring under the fearful disease of obdurate sin, the healing medicine of His pure and perfect doc trine. Their condition, with a fatal exact ness, answered to the description, long before given by the Prophet Isaiah ; and for persons in such a condition of spiritual hardness and insensibility, direct reproof, admonition and instruction were but ill adapted. Offended pride might spurn the salutary censure ; car nal security would deride each intimation of danger ; carelessness would overlook the cap tivating lessons even of heavenly wisdom ; stubbornness of heart would effectually resist their gentle influence. There was however still some chance that liveliness of illustra tion, beauty of figure, the clearness and the force of imaginary scenes, pictured with un rivalled skill, might arrest attention, might awaken interest; — by pleasing the fancy, H 98 SERMON IV. might find a way to move the heart ; — by en gaging the imagination (that busy faculty, which is too often successful in distracting and misleading the mind) on the side of rea son, might collect the wandering thoughts and induce a composure, favourable to serious reflection. Fiction might render palatable truths naturally distasteful. The principle of self-love might be soothed and conciliated, by the insinuating art, which leaves each hearer to deduce his own inferences, to make his own application, to detect within himself the particular faults and imperfections, which have been obliquely stated and, in general terms, condemned. The benevolent Re deemer gladly availed Himself of the oppor tunity, which He perceived to be still re maining; and the Gospel History acquaints us with the success of His attempts, when it informs us that eager crowds were often at tracted by His eloquence and staid listening to His instructions. If the figurative lan guage, in which He spake, sometimes proved enigmatical and concealed, for the time, His meaning from His immediate hearers, it is to be remembered that this happened but on few occasions — not more frequently than might well serve to exemplify the caution, which He delivered to His disciples — "not SERMON IV. 99 " to cast their pearls before swine h." A tem porary veil was thus thrown over predictions, the chief use and value of which were to be subsequent to their fulfilment ; or truth was for a while hidden from those, who had not honesty of mind to deserve, or who were too infirm of purpose, for the present, to bear, its open disclosure. But these exceptions do not seem to have entered into our Lord's ac count, when He explained Himself in the manner reported by St. Matthew ; nor can they be observed to have had any consider able effect upon the character of His teaching by Parables. Before we are at liberty to pause, for the purpose of reflecting, with due sentiments of wonder and thankfulness, on the demonstra tion afforded, in our Saviour's Parables, of His united wisdom and goodness, we are met by a difficulty, arising from the opinion that He spake them with an intended and a stu died obscurity. According to this opinion, He is said to have designed to hide from all but His constant attendants and His faithful fol lowers, the lessons of virtue and piety, which His words might to them, but could not to others, convey. In short, His Parables are thought to have been adapted to a state of h St. Matt. vii. 6. H 2 100 SERMON IV. judicial blindness, in which He found and in which He meant to leave, His unhappy coun trymen. Before any attempt is made to trace this opinion to its origin and to shew the insecure foundation, on which it rests, it may be worth while to consider how irreconcilably it is at variance with our Lord's own express decla rations of the ends of His ministry ; — with His pathetic lamentation over Jerusalem, at the close of His career, as then, but not till then, doomed to inevitable ruin, on account of the loss of opportunities and advantages, which His presence and proposals — His words and works, had afforded ; — with the plain matter of fact, as shewn in the attention of some and the offence of other hearers, on oc casions when Parables were delivered ; and, finally, with the reason of things and the very nature of the case ! For the universal acknowledgment of men, in all ages and in all countries — the suffrage alike of cultivated taste and of that native perception of excel lence, which is, on such a subject, as safe a guide — the universal consent of men assigns to that method of teaching, which our blessed Lord adopted, qualities and effects, directly opposite to those, which have been lately mentioned. SERMON IV. 101 For the farther clearing up of a point, which is of no slight importance in the inter pretation of the New Testament, it becomes necessary to enter into some detail. It must then, in fairness and candour, be owned that the parallel passages in the Gospels of St. Mark and St. Luke are such as, at first sight, to countenance the notion of a penal and pu nitive design, on the part of our Lord. St. Mark reports His words more briefly than St. Matthew ; and St. Luke yet more briefly than St. Mark. " And He said unto them : Unto you it is " given to know the mystery of the Kingdom " of God ; but unto them that are without " all these things are done in Parables — that " seeing they may see and not perceive — and " hearing, they may hear and not understand ; " lest at any time they should be converted " and their sins should be forgiven them1." Such is St. Mark's statement. St. Luke is con tent with a yet shorter summary of what was spoken : "And He said: Unto you it is given to " know the mysteries of the Kingdom of God : " but to others in Parables, that seeing, they " might not see, and hearing, they might not " understand15." i St. Mark iv. 11. k St. Luke viii. 10. H 3 102 SERMON IV. No reader of the three Evangelists can doubt that it is the design of each of them to represent our Lord as quoting, on this first occasion of teaching by Parables, that remark able passage from the Book of the Prophet Isaiah1, which St. Matthew, alone of the three, repeats at full length. In his Gospel, it stands, word for word, as in the Septuagint Version; except that, in two instances, there are varia tions, altogether immaterial; in one, the trans position of a pronoun ; in the other, a slight alteration, in the form of a verb m. In the Gospels of St. Mark and St. Luke, we have found rather an allusion than a quotation. The minute circumstantial differences in the narratives can hardly be thought to warrant an opinion, which has however been main tained, that our Lord, on two separate, al though closely connected, occasions, quoted the words of Isaiah ; once, as St. Matthew re lates ; and again, soon after and in private, as St. Mark and St. Luke agree in relating ; in the former instance, no mention being made of the final cause of speaking in Parables; in the latter instance, the real intent and purpose of this method of teaching being opened to the disciples, and being shewn by Jesus Christ Himself, to have been punitive 1 Is. vi. 9. m Note GG. SERMON IV. 103 and judicial. Of attempts, like this, to re duce the Evangelists to a perfect harmony, by multiplying the incidents of the History, which they in common report, it may be re marked that they are sometimes in danger of being carried too far, and of defeating the very end, at which they aim. They are more likely to magnify the importance of acknow ledged discrepancies than to leave in the candid mind a settled persuasion of their success. A safer principle, for reconciling the three Evangelists in the present case, is at hand ; and may be stated in the words of one of those very Harmonists, from whose view of this particular passage I have already ex pressed my dissent: it is the principle of " estimating the testimony of the less ex- " plicit, the less circumstantial and the less " positive among the Evangelists altogether " in conformity with the testimony of the " more so n." On this principle, St. Matthew must, in the present instance, be chosen for our guide; and under his guidance, it will readily be determined that a mode of expres sion, which at first sounds like a statement of the final cause, is, in truth, to be under- " Note HH. H 4 104 SERMON IV. stood in a milder sense and implies no more than that between our Lord's chosen method of teaching and that moral condition of His hearers, which the Prophet had long before described, there was a designed correspond ence ; in other words, that the former fitted and suited, and was meant to fit and suit, the latter. In the mean time, St. Mark and St. Luke appear to be silent, respecting the ultimate purpose of such correspondence: what that is, we are to learn from St. Mat thew. Not indeed that St. Mark can be re garded as entirely silent ; for, in the words of the text, which belong to the same portion of his Gospel, he plainly intimates that our Lord aimed at the improvement of His hearers by a gracious accommodation of His instructions to their intellectual and moral capacity : " With many such Parables spake " He the word unto them, as they were able " to hear it °." The case of the Gospel miracles may be regarded as analogous to that of the Para bles; and in the analogy thus subsisting, may be found a strong confirmation of the view, which has now been taken, of the latter — more especially of their design and pur- 0 St. Mark iv. 33. SERMON IV. 105 pose, as contrasted with their actual results. St. Matthew, in another passage of his Gospel and on a distinct occasion ; distinct, both as being earlier in point of time ; and as arising out of that review of His mighty works, which had caused our Saviour to upbraid the cities, wherein most of them had been done; St. Mat thew, in a passage altogether distinct from that, which has lately been considered, as cribes to Christ the following language : " I thank thee, O Father, Lord of heaven " and earth, because thou hast hid these " things from the wise and prudent and hast " revealed them unto babes. Even so, Fa- " ther ; for so it seemed good in Thy " sight p." And St. Luke q reports the same acknow ledgment in terms, precisely and without one single variation, the same. Whether, according to St. Luke's narrative, this acknowledgment was or was not made at the same time and in the same place, to which St. Matthew refers it, I undertake not to determine ; since, for my present purpose, it is sufficient to insist that the words of our Lord, whether they were once spoken or more than once repeated, are, as both St. Matthew and St. Luke inform us, founded on P St. Matt. xi. 25, 26. i St. Luke x. 21. 106 SERMON IV. and suggested by, a retrospect of His mira cles and of their actual results. At the time, when Jesus so spake, He thankfully owned the wisdom of the Father and expressed a calm acquiescence in His good pleasure. He adored the justice and the mercy of that Dispensation, under which the wise and pru dent — the Scribes and Pharisees — the saga cious and politic children of this world — failed to profit by the opportunities afforded to them ; whilst babes — the feeble and un learned, but meek and humble, beholders of His deeds — became children of light and en joyed clear discoveries of the word and will of God. The phrase, here employed, of " hiding " these things from the wise and prudent" is similar to language often found in the Sacred Volume, which ascribes to Divine agency the permitted results of human folly, wilfulness and sin. To a customary phrase, proceeding from our blessed Saviour's lips, must be as signed its usual meaning— as indeed appears most evidently from the tenour of the pre ceding expostulation, in which He had in sisted, with a fearful emphasis, on the aggra vated guilt of Chorazin, Bethsaida and Ca pernaum, in comparison even with Tyre and Sidon and the cities of the plain. To the SERMON IV. 107 towns and villages of Galilee had already been vouchsafed such opportunities and such privileges as Tyre and Sidon — Sodom and Gomorrha — had not known ; and it was by the neglect of opportunities and the disre gard of privileges that the amount of their guilt was increased. The painful retrospect required and called forth His lowly submission : it admitted of no other comfort than that of contemplating the happier case of the weak, the weary and the heavy laden, who had reaped advantage from His labours. But His strongest expres sions must be interpreted agreeably to the view, which He had previously taken, of the condition and circumstances of those, concerning whom He spake. If the Father had indeed " hidden these things from the " wise and prudent," it was only in a sense consistent with the display, before their eyes, of miracles, plain and numerous — with the employment of a machinery, contrived, ar ranged and admirably fitted for the purpose of effecting their conviction and conversion. It is remarkable that St. Luke concludes the passage of his Gospel, which we have now been considering, in the following man ner : " And He turned Him unto His disciples 108 SERMON IV. " and said privately : Blessed are the eyes, " which see the things that ye see ; for I tell " you that many Prophets and Kings have " desired to see those things, which ye see " and have not seen them ; and to hear those " things, which ye hear and have not heard " themr!" The same train of thought, conveyed al most without variation in the same words, St. Matthew, as we have already seen, ascribes to our Redeemer, when He condescended to explain His motives for teaching by Parables and anticipated the results of the method of instruction, which He deliberately and with most merciful intent adopted. In His own mind, the two instances of miracles and Pa rables were regarded as corresponding with each other, in cause, in tendency and in re sult; nor does it seem that we should be justified in assigning to the latter a cha racter of studied obscurity and an express purpose of concealment, which we cannot per ceive to belong to the former. Once more — it is in connection with the miracles of our Lord that the Evangelist St. John introduces the very same quotation from the Prophet Isaiah, which the other three Evangelists have stated that He Him- r St. Luke x. 23, 24. SERMON IV. 109 self applied to the subject of His Parables; and St. John's formula of quotation from the Prophet is precisely that, which St. Mark and St. Luke have employed. When we learn from St. John that, " though Jesus had done " so many miracles before them, yet they " believed not on Him — that the saying of " Esaias the prophet might be fulfilled, which " He spake : Lord, who hath believed our " report ? and to whom hath the arm of the " Lord been revealed ? Therefore they could " not believe, because that Esaias said again : " He hath blinded their eyes and hardened " their heart, that they should not see with " their eyes, nor understand with their heart " and be converted and I should heal them8" — when we read the passages thus quoted and applied by St. John, we clearly understand that the Evangelist is far from intending to say that the inability to believe was superin duced and caused, in order that the predic tion of the Prophet might be accomplished ; still less that the miracles in question were wrought with a view to the end of incre dulity, on the part of those, who should wit ness them. We see that the fact of their unbelief is represented to bespeak a state of mind and 5 St. John xii. 37, 38, 39, 40. 110 SERMON IV. heart, which rendered them the awful exam ples of such blindness and insensibility as the inspired Prophet had foretold. In like man ner therefore are we to understand the simi lar language of St. Mark and St. Luke, with respect to Parables. If by them Parables are said to have been uttered " that the people " seeing, might not see, and, hearing, might " not understand," we observe a brief form of quotation or of reference; and discover that it was the object of both these Evan gelists, in perfect agreement with St. Mat thew, to point out a twofold fulfilment of a remarkable passage ofthe Prophetic Volume — as that passage related, on the one hand, to the moral condition of the hearers of the Messiah ; and on the other, to the peculiar manner of instruction, which He adopted. And now, at length, from a discussion, which will not be deemed unimportant and which, it is hoped, may prove not unprofit able, we are at liberty to return to a consi deration of the aid, which Parables lent to the attractive eloquence and the persuasive doctrine of the Son of God. And here how can we better form a conception of their na tural tendency and their powerful effect for His immediate hearers, than by reflecting on the manner, in which they reach ourselves SERMON IV. Ill and come home to our own bosoms ? If an appeal be made to our judgment and feel ings, we shall surely answer that there is not for ourselves any peculiar difficulty in ascer taining the scope and purport and general meaning of the Parables of the New Testa ment. We shall readily own that these are not the passages, which place formidable ob stacles in our way — which perplex and em barrass us, in our sincere endeavours to un derstand the Sacred Word and apply its rules to practice. On the contrary, are we not con scious that these are portions of Holy Scrip ture, on which we dwell with a lingering fondness — to which we recur with never fail ing interest — in which we find engagement without weariness and instruction without offence ? When in early childhood, we, like Samuel, " did not yet know the Lord neither " was the word of the Lord yet revealed unto " us V' these winning narratives had power to fix our attention ; and by them we were gently and gradually taught to distinguish the voice of God, calling us, from that loved voice of parental or Pastoral authority, with which for a while we innocently confounded it. The same passages of the Holy Gospels have formed the entertainment and the so- * 1 Sam. iii. 7. 112 SERMON IV. lace of our riper manhood; and we expect that they will become for ourselves, what we find that they have been and are for many around us, the source of refreshment and of mental vigour in declining years. It is moreover from the Parables of our blessed Lord especially that we learn the true philosophy of Morals. They furnish principles of action rather than precise and definite rules of conduct. Whilst they are far removed from the stiffness and formal ity of burdensome and tedious directions for the minute details of daily behaviour, they stand equally distant from the vague and inapplicable generalities of abstract theory. Their lessons spring out of the relations, events and circumstances of real life — of that life, which we ourselves are liv ing — but the life, of which they draw the striking picture, is for the most part stripped of local and temporary peculiarities ; if such peculiarities are ever allowed to remain, they impart only an additional interest, when they are observed; and have scarcely a perceptible influence, in rendering the proper practical inferences less easy or less perspicuous for men of every age and every country. Re taining each tender and touching association, to which our common nature is alive, they SERMON IV. 113 yet condescend to nothing low, they are dis figured by no shade of coarseness ; they offer no repulsive features. In short, it may be truly said that, wherever the Holy Gospels have been — wherever they shall be, read and studied, the Parables, contained in them, have served and will serve to exalt our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, as a Moral Teacher, above all who have hitherto appeared in that character. His vast superiority in this re spect cannot establish — is not alleged to prove — the doctrine of His Divine nature. But it is in perfect harmony with that doctrine, which it in some sort confirms, and by which it is itself illustrated and explained. When we regard our great Instructor as God in the form and likeness of man, we can ac count for the searching power and penetrating force of the lessons, which He taught. The Supreme Master of all minds, He knew well how to reach those hidden recesses, which the varying circumstances of time, of place and of customs may disguise and cover but which are really to be found in all u. " He that " planted the ear, shall He not hear ? He that " formed the eye, shall He not see" ?" Since it is " our God who instructs us to discretion " and teaches us ;" since the words to which " Note KK. x Psalm xci v. 9. 114 SERMON IV. we are called to listen, " come forth from the " Lord of Hosts, which is wonderful in coun- " sel and excellent in working3"' — we perceive a sufficient reason — a fit and adequate cause — for the superior advantages, which we en joy. Since the wisdom and the goodness in this instance concerned, are confessed to be Divine, we see only their natural result, in the dispensation, which has provided that the essential elements of Poetry, concentrated and embodied in the teaching of the Son of God, should impart to that teaching a fresh ness and a life, of which no change of exter nal form or variety of language can deprive itz. Translation may lessen the energy or mar the beauty of the moral precept and the sententious apophthegm ; over the Parables of our Saviour it can have but a trifling in fluence. They depend for their effect upon principles within the human breast, to which an equally successful appeal may be made under all those wide outward differences, which shape or modify the character and the speech of man. Like the works of the same glorious Author, they too admit of being uni versally proclaimed and published. " There " is no speech nor language, where their voice " may not be heard. Their sound may go y Isa. xxviii. 29. z Note LL. SERMON IV. 115 " out into all lands and their words into the " ends of the world3." The general view, which has been on the present occasion taken, of the Parables of our Lord, will be best supported by some parti cular examples ; but, in the first place and especially, by such examples as He Himself was pleased to unfold and apply. To these therefore will our attention be directed in the next Lecture. a Psalm xix. 3, 4. i 2 SERMON V. St. Mark iv. 34 (in latter part.) And when they were alone, He expounded all things to His disciples. IHE interest of the Gospel History is greatly heightened by the manner, in which it often opens to our view the more retired scenes of our blessed Saviour's intercourse with His chosen companions — with that small band of the immediate attendants on His Person, which consisted of the Twelve and some few others, closely connected with them by ties of relationship or friendship. Upon these occasions we observe, on the part of our Lord, whatever His public career would lead us to anticipate of mild dignity, of for bearance and of benevolence ; whilst, on the part of His disciples, we behold a demeanour, perfectly suitable to their relation and cir cumstances — marked not less by a reveren tial deference to His authority than by a SERMON V. 117 freedom of speech, plainly indicating their love and confidence. Passages of this sort have the effect of imparting to the narra tives of the Evangelists the character and the charms of Biography; they are among the principal means of gratifying our natural desire of information, when it has once been awakened and directed towards the Person and the actions of Jesus Christ ; they rivet our attention and engage our hearts. Nor are they interesting only. They may prove eminently profitable also ; for by them light is sometimes thrown over incidents and dis courses that might otherwise have appeared to us, as to the multitude, in our Lord's own day, they did actually appear, obscure and difficult to be explained. The words of the text fix our thoughts on an instance, in which this advantage is set prominently before us. Jesus is in them represented as having avail ed Himself of an opportunity of retirement, immediately after His delivery of the first series of Parables, which He spake, for the purpose of " expounding all things" — doubt less all He had been lately saying — " to His " disciples." We can not read this general inti mation without an involuntary and transient wish that we ourselves were in possession of every word, which the disciples were privi- i 3 118 SERMON V. leged to hear. We fancy that we should thus approach the Parables of the Holy Gos pels with a far better chance than we now have or can ever hope to have, of penetrating into their real meaning and of ascertaining their scope and purport. A slight reflection will however serve to shew that wishes and hopes of this kind are vain and useless ; they are in fact innocent, only while they retain that involuntary character, which belongs to them in the first moment of their occurrence. Any such indulgence as renders them sub stantial or permanent is attended by the mischievous and fatal consequence of sub stituting, for zeal and diligence in using the means of improvement that have been grant ed and are within our reach, the idle amuse ment of imagining advantages and helps, which might have been afforded to our weak ness. But in the particular instance now under our consideration, much more may be said for the reproof of such idle wishes. With regard to the Parables of our Divine Instruc tor and His own interpretation of them, the very wishes, to which I have alluded, have been, to all practical intents and purposes, indulged and gratified. We are favoured with the full detail of His expositions of two out of the whole number of those, which He de- SERMON V. 119 livered, when He first began to speak in Pa rables. Each of the three earlier Evangelists is careful to relate one of these Parables and to join with it his Master's own interpreta tion. St. Matthew also accompanies with our Lord's own explanation another of the num ber, which he alone has preserved. On all ordinary principles, applicable to such a sub ject, these two clear examples may well be regarded as sufficing for specimens of the method of the Teacher, whom we justly and reasonably desire to follow. The fact how ever is that the Gospels furnish us with more instances of moral use and improvement than these two ; and although it must be granted that the whole number of both formal expo sitions and briefer applications is small, in comparison with the whole number of the recorded Parables, yet ought we to remember that to the case of an Instructor designing His lessons for everlasting continuance and for universal circulation, and so transmitting them, through the instrumentality of inspired Reporters, are applicable other principles, be sides those to which reference has been al ready made. The peculiarity of this case is such as to warrant, on our part, an expecta tion of authoritative guidance and to lead us to the sure conclusion that, in our Lord's i 4 120 SERMON V. recorded expositions and applications, how small soever their number may be, we have the key, which He condescended to put into the hands of His followers, and whereby He was pleased to enable them to unlock and to unfold all the treasures of meaning that may be contained in His Parables. This however is a conclusion, of which the interpreters of the New Testament have too often lost sight ; and in examining the views that have been taken and the use that has been made of the Parabolic portion of our Lord's doctrine, it is really astonishing to observe how little of salutary check or control His own example and practice have exercised over the imagi nations and the fancies of men. The feeling. of astonishment naturally excited by the first appearance of such a state of things, yields to other and less agreeable feelings, upon a re view of the History of Scripture-interpreta tion. It is unnecessary here to dwell on the serious injury, which the Christian Church has sustained from the attempts, ancient and modern, of men fond of allegory and disposed to find a mystical or spiritual meaning in every passage of the Sacred Volume". Since even the Historical portions of that Holy Volume have been thought, by eager and a Note MM. SERMON V. 121 mistaken, although confessedly, in many in stances, learned and able Commentators, to convey remote and secondary senses, capable of being exalted to a far higher importance than any, which the letter of the narratives can claim, we cease to wonder that other por tions, in their own nature more liable to the abuse, should have been, in the most extra ordinary ways, misapplied, perverted, and, by being rendered vague and nugatory, deprived of their true practical efficiency and worth. We are no longer surprised that Parables especially have shared this fate ; and with re gard to the Parables delivered by our Lord and recorded in the Gospels, we perceive a reason for peculiar danger, to which they have been exposed, in the view, that has been frequently entertained of their express de sign and avowed object. As long as the opin ion is held and maintained that they were spoken for the sake of concealment — that their very end and purpose were to punish wilful obstinacy and hardness of heart, by withholding the instructions, of which that state of mind is unworthy and for which it is unfit — occasion is of course given for a labo rious search after abstruse and hidden mean ings and for painful efforts to discover the mysteries that may by any possibility lurk 122 SERMON V. under the lovely imagery, which adorns and beautifies the teaching of the Son of God. A plain, simple and edifying application (al though that alone may be intended) is sure to escape the notice of an eye, practised in the nice, and over-curious examination of minute particulars. Such an application is equally sure to offend the taste of an appe tite for that which is entertaining or marvel lous, more especially if such appetite has been long pampered by indulgence. It was my endeavour, in the preceding Lec ture of this course, to maintain an opinion directly opposite to that, of which I have been stating some of the evil consequences ; and to vindicate the wisdom and the goodness of Jesus Christ, our Lord, by shewing that with a skill, which no philosopher has sur passed, He discerned — with a depth of feel ing and an energy of language, which neither poet nor orator can rival, He adopted and employed effectual means for the moral im provement of His hearers, whilst by His Pa rables more especially He arrested their at tention, reached their hearts and engaged their strongest and best affections. It is my design, on the present occasion, to confirm and illustrate the opinion, already stated and defended on general principles, by a consi- SERMON V. 123 deration of the particular instances, in which our Saviour was pleased to provide for a danger that He foresaw, by expounding or applying His own Parables and causing His expositions and applications to hold a conspi cuous place in the Records of His teaching. It is obvious that the three earlier Gospels differ widely from that of St. John, in the re lation which they bear, to our present subject of Inquiry. The last of the Four Gospels is destitute of set and formal Parables ; and is comparatively seldom ornamented with figu rative and illustrative language. And when the three other Gospels are carefully exa mined, it is soon perceived that they too differ among themselves in this respect. St. Mat thew, for instance, is more copious than St. Mark, in his report of the Discourses of our Lord containing Parables ; whilst St. Luke, relating often the same Parables and some times virtually the same interpretation, occa sionally indeed omits what his predecessors have stated, but more frequently, supplies passages of this class, which are not found else where, and which impart to his Gospel an in terest and a value peculiarly its own. Notwith standing these slighter differences, St. Mat thew, St. Mark and St. Luke will all furnish some useful materials for our present purpose. 124 SERMON V. The Parable of the Sower is reported as the first in order of time of all our Saviour's Parables. It is the one which has been al ready mentioned as common to the three Evangelists ; and it is in each Gospel followed by that interpretation, which was readily granted in compliance with the request of the Disciples b. The Parable and its inter pretation are, on these three occasions, given with but few variations — seldom more than verbal, always and altogether unimportant, so far as the meaning of the whole passage is concerned. The structure of the fictitious narrative is simple and perfectly inartificial ; and therefore, amidst such minor differences of expression and of form as were natural and almost unavoidable, easily preserves its iden tity ; nor is it uninteresting to remark that there is one particular, contributing towards this identity, which is lost to the reader of the English translation only. Each of the Evangelists speaks of the sower — the way side — the stony places — stony ground or rock — the thorns — and the good ground — with a repeated and carefully preserved emphasis of the definite article ; an emphasis, falling in with and confirming the opinion that our b St. Matt. xiii. St. Mark iv. St. Luke viii. SERMON V. 125 Lord borrowed His illustration, in this in stance, from a process of the season then pre sent, going on before the eyes of Himself and His hearers; and from such circumstances, belonging to every field, as were, even while He spake, open to the observation of all. When from this Parable we turn to the moral use, which its Author Himself made of it, we acquire a new perception of its force and beauty ; we are struck with the ease, pro priety and gracefulness of the accommodation in each particular ; in the absence of every trace of effort, of the distortion of a single feature, of tedious minuteness in any one in stance, we pronounce the Apologue and the lesson drawn from it to be alike faultless. We are compelled to feel and own that the lesson is one of universal and of everlasting importance ; nor can we conceive a fitter in troduction to that new method of teaching, which our Lord was about to employ than the loud and affecting warning, in this Para ble contained, that the best instruction — the instruction, most wisely contrived and most skilfully conveyed, — depends, after all, for its effect upon the state of mind and heart of those, to whom it is addressed. The Parable of the tares of the field is one, which St.Matthew alone ofthe Evangelists has 126 SERMON V. recorded0. The fable here is, if I may so speak, somewhat more highly wrought and more finished than in the preceding example. The incidents, without being either numerous or intricate, have more of variety ; and they are woven, with a greater degree of art, into one perfect whole. A scene, often verified in man's experience, is pictured with colours as true to nature as they are vivid and striking ; and to the whole scene the freshness and ani mation of real life are imparted by the intro duction of human agency — of the activity, the vigilance and the prudence, which are con cerned in the regulation of human affairs. But the application, made by our Divine Teacher Himself, is, as in the former instance, moral, in the strict and proper sense of the word ; and, as such, it is moreover plain, forcible and practical. " He that soweth the good seed is the Son " of man. The field is the world. The good " seed are the children of the Kingdom ; but " the tares are the children of the wicked " one. The enemy that sowed them is the " Devil. The harvest is the end of the world; " and the reapers are the angels. As there- " fore the tares are gathered and burned in " the fire, so shall it be in the end of this <¦ St. Matt. xiii. 24—30 and 36—43. SERMON V- 127 " world. The Son of man shall send forth " His angels and they shall gather out of His " Kingdom all things that offend and them " which do iniquity ; and shall cast them into " a furnace of fire. There shall be wailing " and gnashing of teeth. Then shall the " righteous shine forth as the Sun in the " Kingdom of their Father." Who can doubt respecting the main lesson here actually derived from the Parable ? As little can any one hesitate, with regard to the design ofthe Parable itself and the intention of Him, who spake it. The purpose clearly was to draw attention to a future public and final declaration of the distinction between the righteous and the wicked ; and to found, on the certainty of such declaration, a solemn and impressive warning of the necessity of righteousness and the danger of sin. The machinery of the Parable was so contrived and arranged as to afford occasion and to sup ply means for the display of some momentous truths, to which our Saviour saw fit to refer, because they were calculated to prove, in a powerful manner, auxiliary towards His chief design. The end of the world — the judicial office, which He Himself shall then assume and execute — the ministry of angelic Beings under His orders — the opposite conditions of 128 SERMON V. misery and of glory, to which, after the day of judgment, the race of man shall be con signed — these momentous facts and events of the Divine Dispensations are incidentally dis closed and by most apt illustrations repre sented. These are indeed and may, in a very proper sense of the words, be called " myste- " ries of the Kingdom of Heaven ;" but they are mysteries, which the Gospel expressly and avowedly, plainly and without figure, opens and unfoldsd. The figurative language of this Parable certainly serves rather to enforce them on the consciences and to impress them on the hearts of all, than to hide them from one class of hearers and to make them known for the first time to another. It is to be ob served that one prominent feature of the Pa rable is entirely overlooked and altogether disappears in the exposition. " The Servants " said unto the householder : Wilt thou that "we go and gather up the tares? But he " said : Nay — lest ivhile ye gather up the " tares, ye root up also the wheat with them. " Let both grow together until the harvest." Such was the natural — the almost unavoid able filling up of the fictitious narrative. No more suitable reason than that, which is in these words given, could have been assigned d Note NN. SERMON V. ^129 for the householder's refusal to comply with the request of his zealous servants, in the supposed case of a field abounding with tares. The spirit, the liveliness and the dramatic interest of the Parable depend in great mea sure upon the introduction of this striking passage. In our Lord's exposition, we look for it in vain. Far from finding any stress "laid upon these subordinate, yet by no means unimportant, circumstances, of the fictitious narrative, we cannot discover, in the applica tion, so much as a distant allusion to them. There is no attempt to turn them to any pur pose of moral or spiritual improvement. The omission on the part of our Divine Teacher is rendered so much the more remarkable, by the significance, which He has, in the instance of this Parable attributed to other circum stances, in themselves apparently not more considerable. What then are we to learn from His omission ? What other lesson can we learn than that, whenever we venture to inter pret the Parables of Holy Scripture, it is our duty, in following the example, which He has set us, to dwell rather on their main scope and purpose than on such minuter fea tures as are but illustrative, ornamental and subsidiary ? Thus, in the instance now before us, the fact of the delay, until the end of the K 130 SERMON V. world, of that broad distinction between the righteous and the wicked, which is finally to take place — the fact of this delay is clearly indicated by the whole tenour of the Pa rable and forms the basis of its moral ap plication ; but the reasons of the fact it was not our Lord's immediate purpose to explain ; concerning them, the machinery, which He had condescended to employ for a different end, was not calculated to afford any information. If we are desirous of learn ing what these reasons are, we need be at no loss. They are elsewhere in the Holy Gos pels, as well as in many other portions of the Sacred Volume, both plainly stated and pa thetically urged. They are reasons of gra cious consideration, not for the righteous but for the wicked — of long suffering and com passion towards those, who are spared, in or der that they may be brought to repentance, amendment and salvation. From St. Matthew, to whom we owe the Parable of the Tares of the field, we receive also that of the debtor of ten thousand talents and his fellow-servant e. In the case of this beautiful and affecting Parable, the circum stances of the occasion, which drew it forth from the lips of our Redeemer, might seem e St. Matt, xviii. 23 to 35. SERMON V. 131 sufficient to guard for ever against its mis application and to rescue its touching inci dents from the grasp of that criticism, which tortures and deforms all that comes within its reach. " Then came Peter to Him and " said : Lord, how oft shall my brother sin " against me, and I forgive him ? till seven " times ? Jesus saith unto him : I say not " unto thee until seven times : but until se- " venty times seven f." A more direct or fuller answer to his question the Apostle could not require, nor was it possible that he should forget the terms of a precept, which taking up his own expressions, had so employed them as to put to shame the poverty of what he had doubtless deemed his large and liberal allowance for the faults of his offending bro ther. Our blessed Lord however was not con tent with this method, impressive as it was, of inculcating His favourite topic of mutual forgiveness and of charity. He proceeded to illustrate and enforce the lesson, which He had already delivered, by a Parable, of whose united tenderness and force of appeal none but the most hardened heart can fail to be susceptible. A debtor of the vast sum de noted by ten thousand talents, having no power to pay, is condemned by his Lord to f Ver. 21, 22. K 2 132 SERMON V. be sold and his wife and his children and all that he had, that payment may be made. Is it possible that one stroke can be added to heighten this picture of hopeless distress and of approaching ruin ? The unhappy man has recourse to prayer for indulgence and to pro mises of final payment ; and gains from his compassionate Lord what he had not ven tured to ask or to expect — the free forgive ness of the debt. In the future management of his own affairs, he finds a fellow-servant, owing him an hundred pence — a paltry amount, not fit to be compared with his own lately remitted debt: entirely forgetful ofthe treatment, which he had himself just expe rienced — not recalled to a recollection of that treatment by the very language of the ad dress, with which He had approached his Lord, repeated now in his own ears and urged upon himself — he proceeds to extre mities and casts his debtor into prison. The sorrow of the fellow- ser van ts — the just and natural expression of that sorrow — the calm and reasonable, yet indignant, expostulation of the offended Lord of both debtors — the wrath, with which every hearer must sym pathise, and the punishment, in the perfect propriety of which all must acquiesce — these several circumstances are put forward and SERMON V. 133 described in a manner, to which repetition in any other language than that of the inspired Evangelist cannot but do injustice. Of this Parable we have our Saviour Christ's own moral use and application. It is conveyed in the following brief and com prehensive terms : " So likewise shall my " Heavenly Father do also unto you, if ye, " from your hearts, forgive not every one his " brother their trespasses." In these few words is contained the lesson, which He meant to draw ; and by such an improve ment of His own Parable, He has again em phatically warned us that conscience is not to be disturbed, in her salutary office of re proof and admonition, by the intrusion of imagination — that the efficiency of His Mo ral Teaching is not to be diminished, by wasting on its external clothing and its form those efforts of attention, which its substance ought rather to command. The Parable of the Labourers in the vine yard (another of those Parables, which are found in St. Matthew's Gospel only s) is fol lowed by our Lord's own application — an application short indeed, but emphatic — sum med up in that sententious form of speech, s St. Matt. xx. 1 — 16. k 3 134 SERMON V. which He is reported, on other occasions, to have used, and which, by the details of this Parable, He appears to have intended to ex plain and to enforce. " So the last shall be " first and the first last ; for many be called ; " but few chosen." That privileges embraced, as soon as they are offered — that advantages diligently and faithfully employed, from the first moment (how late soever that may be) of receiving them — will, by God's mercy, end in the rich reward, originally promised to the earliest possessors of the same privileges and advantages — this is the general truth — a truth of everlasting interest — which our Saviour inculcates ; and by which He gra ciously raises the hopes and cheers the spi rits of all such as may, even at " the eleventh " hour of the day" of life, be raised to an alarming consciousness that, as far as the ser vice of their rightful Lord and Master is concerned, they have been " standing all the " day idle." To the opposite class of per sons — to those, who are represented by " the " labourers hired early in the morning into " the vineyard" — a delicate and indirect ad monition is conveyed ; and they are reminded that the Dispensation, which is for others one of overflowing goodness, is for them and for all one of perfect equity. " Be not high- SERMON V. 135 "minded but fearh" — is the caution, which they must hear, when they are informed that their places in the Kingdom of Heaven may finally be taken by those, who were once far below themselves ; — nor does this caution lose any of its power, by reason of that " lenity " of supposition" of the Parable ', which as signs to all the labourers in the vineyard their reward. In this particular instance it is impossible not to observe a characteristic, which belongs to several of our Lord's Para bles. It is well adapted to the circumstances of His own times, and anticipates what was to happen, upon the publication of the Gos pel to the whole world. The events then present or soon about to occur, were per ceived by our Lord to be cases, coming un der His general supposition and exemplify ing His general principle ; but overlooking for the present, these special cases, as sure in due season to attract the notice, to which they were entitled and to indicate His Pro phetic foresight, He passes at once to that grand Moral lesson, which is by Him design ed to belong to all times and places. What reader of the Gospels can forget the answer returned to the question of a certain lawyer, who, having received satisfaction on h Rom. xi. 20. ' Note OO. K 4 136 SERMON V. one important point, "willing to justify him- " self, said" farther " unto Jesus : And who "is my neighbour?" The beautiful apo logue of the good Samaritan is the means of rebuking his captious temper and of com pelling him to prescribe to himself his own duty. " Which now of these three, thinkest thou, " was neighbour unto him that fell among " the thieves ? And he said : He that shewed " mercy on him. Then said Jesus unto him: " Go and do thou likewise." In words thus few and impressive — in a manner thus point ed, yet full of dignity — did the Author of this Parable himself explain, apply and enforce its moral lesson ! It is melancholy to reflect on the contrast, which other interpretations of the same Parable have often presented ; on the low and unworthy associations, which have debased its incidents — on the cumbrous load of fancies, which has concealed its real import ! The Parable of the rich man, whose ground " brought forth plentifully15" is both preceded and followed by a plain and unmetaphorical statement of the lesson, which it was designed to teach : the introduction to the passage is couched in the following terms : " Take heed k St. Luke xii. 15—21. SERMON V. 137 " and beware of covetousness ; for a man's life " consisteth not in the abundance ofthe things " which he possesseth " — and the improve ment, which follows, is comprehended in one striking sentence : " So is he that layeth up " treasure for himself and is not rich towards " God." The instances, which have now been alleged from the three earlier Evangelists, will abun dantly suffice for the purpose I have in view. The passage of St. John's Gospel, which bears the strongest resemblance to the Parabolical portions of the other Gospels, is the former part of the Tenth chapter of that Gospel ; although it is to be remarked that the word there translated Parable is more commonly rendered Proverb ; and might perhaps lead us to expect, what we certainly find, less of distinctness and entireness of narrative in the illustrations themselves and a greater degree of intermixture between the figures and the subject represented by them than we else where look for or discover in Parables. Of set and formal Parables indeed, in that limited sense of the word, in which we have in this and the preceding Lecture employed it, it has been already stated that the Gospel of St. John is destitute. As however the passage above mentioned may serve to throw light 138 SERMON V. upon our Saviour's method of interpretation, it is worth while here to bestow on it some attention. The Shepherd of the sheep, enter ing by the door into the fold, readily admitted by the Porter, and known to all the sheep, as soon as his voice is heard — was an object fa miliar to the eye of every inhabitant of Jeru salem, where regular inclosures for separate flocks kept ready for sacrifice were under the superintendence and management of an ap pointed officer. From this source our Lord borrowed His illustration ; but finding that He was not understood, He graciously pro ceeded to point out a twofold application, of which His figurative language admitted. " I " am the door of the sheep — I am the door ; " by me, if any man enter in, he shall be saved " and shall go in and out and find pasture." But the second application rises in beauty and in importance. " I am the good shepherd : " the good shepherd giveth his life for the " sheep. I am the good shepherd and know " my sheep and am known of mine." Taking the occasion, which this lively image furnished, He contrasted Himself with thieves and rob bers and hireling shepherds, who had gone before Himself, and plainly announced His own purpose of laying down His life for the sheep of that fold, whose limits were to be SERMON V. 139 extended, until for the whole world there should be onefold and one shepherd. By thus dividing, He, at the same time, simplified, the application of the imagery, which He had em ployed ; whilst by quickly varying that appli cation, He withdrew the minds of his imme diate hearers and meant doubtless to with draw the minds of His followers for ever, from any over-curious search after some hid den and mysterious import of His figurative language. Upon the whole then we may now safely inquire what ought to be for us the result of a calm survey of the instances, wherein Jesus Christ Himself interpreted or applied his own Parables — whether privately before His disciples only or in the presence of all His hearers ? Does His practice encourage the no tion that He spake Parables, with a view to cover and conceal His real meaning ? Does He sanction any expectation of latent predictions, ultimately to be discovered ; or fix our thoughts on dark and enigmatical communications, that may stimulate curiosity but long defy its most successful efforts ? That some indeed of His Parables were prophetic, it is impossible to deny : we have regarded one instance, and as it were, specimen, as a proof that tHey were so ; an instance in which, subsequent events 140 SERMON V. corresponded with His intimations. And it is as impossible to deny that future events in the world or in the Church may still arise and may disclose a Prophetic meaning in passages, which are not at present held to have that character. But, even in the instances wherein a Prophetic design has been discovered, Pro phecy does not appear to have been the main and primary object of the Parables : it is rather subordinate to some great Moral pur pose, to which both immediate and future attention was to be awakened and for the sake of effecting which the texture itself of the fictitious narrative was framed and wrought. We are favoured with an exam ple and a proof of what we may not im properly call complex wisdom, as often as we observe that into the substance of Moral lessons are introduced and, as it were, inter woven prophetic notices also. Again, when we are compelled by the instances, which we have been contemplating, to grant that our Lord Himself was chiefly intent on drawing a suitable moral or spiritual lesson, what is the manner of doing so on His part, which calls for our notice and imitation ? Does He dwell on every minute particular of the ima ginary scene, not content until He has dis covered for each its own peculiar significance? SERMON V. 141 The case has been observed to be far other wise. No verbal niceties, no trifling remarks, no fanciful interpretations can find either a justification or an excuse in the example of our great — our perfect Teacher. His lessons are occasionally marked by what may be called a minuteness of detail; but it is a mi nuteness which proves neither wearisome nor low. More frequently they are short and em phatic admonitions, depending on the general air and combined circumstances of images, which He has for ever consecrated to the end of the moral and spiritual improvement of mankind m. And now, if our blessed Lord's reason for speaking in Parables has been satisfactorily explained and vindicated from some misap prehensions, to which it has been liable ; and if a view, confessedly inadequate, yet in any degree just and accurate, has been taken of the Parables, which He spake and of His own method of interpreting them — we may return, with lowly thankfulness, to the ac knowledgment, already made, of the good ness and the wisdom of Him, who has conde scended to become our Guide and Teacher. Every word that proceeded out of His mouth, ™ Note PP. 142 SERMON V. is perceived and felt by us «to be worthy of the lofty source, to which we ascribe it ; and, as we advance in the knowledge and the practice of His moral precepts, we gain a con tinually increasing confidence in worshipping Him as " Immanuel — God with us n." » St. Matt. i. 23. SERMON VI. St. Luke xv. 1 and 2. Then drew near unto Him all the publicans and sinners for to hear Him. And the Pharisees and Scribes murmured, saying: This man re ceiveth sinners and eateth with them. A HERE were several distinct occasions, on which the malignant or the mistaken ob servers of the conduct of our Lord excepted against Him, on account of His associates; not indeed His constant and daily compa nions, but rather those, with whom He some times and under certain circumstances chose to hold intercourse. A review of these occa sions, as they are reported in the Gospel History, falls in with the design and will fur ther the end of the present course of Lec tures ; since it will place before us some of the most affecting scenes of the ministry of our Lord and Saviour. In the objections urged by His enemies; in the methods of 144 SERMON VI. meeting and removing those objections, adopt ed by Himself, we shall find matter for much serious reflection ; and shall discover some in cidental but striking notices of that Divine glory, which the lowly condition of His hu man nature shrouded but did not always nor entirely conceal. The first of those occasions, which call for our present attention, is that of the " great " feast," which Levi or Matthew, if not im mediately, at all events soon after his call, " made" for our Lord " in his own house." Each of the three earlier Evangelists fur nishes a narrative of this occurrence". The differences between their accounts respect only such nicer touches of the picture as are historically altogether unimportant, although to the accurate eye of a fine moral discern ment by no means uninteresting. Thus St. Matthew himself, who was at once the host and the reporter, employs not a single ex pression, which can, by any possibility, inti mate to the reader of his Gospel his own studious care to do honour to his guest ; or which can convey the remotest hint of hospi tality conducted on a large and liberal scale. From St. Luke alone we learn that Levi made a St. Matt. ix. 9—13. St. Mark ii. 14—17. St. Luke v. 27—32. SERMON VI. 145 a great feast ; and that the company con sisted partly of his fellow publicans and partly of such other guests as were within his reach and willing to take their places at his board — those doubtless of the number of his ac quaintance and neighbours, who were most respectable at once in station and in charac ter ; and, who, in the opinion of St. Matthew, were most likely to derive advantage from the Instructor, whose call he had himself re cently obeyed. The Scribes and Pharisees, indeed, of whom mention is introduced in connection with this feast, may seem, from the reports of St. Matthew and St. Mark, to have been by-standers and spectators only ; but St. Luke's manner of speaking implies not improbably that they too were among the guests and that they were surprised and annoyed at discovering around them many individuals of those classes of society, which were the objects of their well-known aver sion. " There was a great company of pub- " Means and *of others, that sat down with " them ; but the Scribes and Pharisees of " them" — those of them, that were Scribes and Pharisees — " murmured b." The terms of their objection, according to St. Matthew b Note QQ. L 146 SERMON VI. and St. Mark, were as follows : " Why eateth " your Master — how is it that He eateth, " with Publicans and sinners ?" whilst St. Luke reports the objection to have been the same in substance and addressed, in the same manner, indirectly to our Lord, through His disciples, but involving them also, with their Master, in the censure : " Why do ye eat and " drink with Publicans and sinners ?" Jesus overheard what was passing ; and, with the calm composure of His wonted dignity, re lieved His disciples by undertaking to return an answer in behalf both of Himself and them. He referred His censurers, on this occasion, to a remarkable passage of the Pro phet Hosea, from which they might have learned and ought to have learned how, in the Divine esteem, moral qualities rank above ceremonial observances — how great is the su periority, in God's sight, of the virtues of the heart over the appointed sacrifices and offer ings of His own law. St. Mark and St. Luke, omitting the quotation and its awakening ap peal, mention only our Saviour's vindication of Himself — St. Mark, in the identical ex pressions of St. Matthew, St. Luke, in ex pressions slightly varying, but equivalent in force and meaning : " They that are whole SERMON VI. 147 " need not a Physician ; but they that are " sick. I am come, not to call the righteous " but sinners to repentance c." Such is the language, in which the Son of God vindicated His conduct from the blame that had been cast upon it. We can not but acknowledge that these few words were well calculated for their primary pur pose of silencing the cavils of those, in whose hearing they were uttered ; and that they were worthy of that care, with which the Evangelists have preserved and transmitted them. In and by them, our blessed Lord declares that the sinners of the race of man were and for ever will be, the objects of His merciful regard — that it was in the discharge of the very duty, which He had undertaken to perform ; in the execution of the very end of His mission and ministry, that He entered into their society, invited and encouraged them to listen to His instructions and held a condescending intercourse with them. He is pleased to illustrate both His principle and His practice by the analogy of a familiar ex ample ; and to insist that a Physician might, with as much propriety, absent himself from the abodes and disregard the applications and entreaties of the sick, as Himself withdraw c Note RR. l 2 148 SERMON VI. from the dwellings and shun the conversa tion, of the sinful. That He spake here in a tone of irony — that He meant to reflect, with any degree of sharpness or severity, on those individuals of the company, in the midst of which He was, who had called forth His ex planation and defence — it is not necessary to suppose. We may indeed well believe that His penetrating eye detected, in the breasts of some of those around Him, a secret spirit of self-satisfaction and self-congratulation, on a comparison of their own moral condition with that of others. He undoubtedly beheld and pitied the mistake of some, who laboured under a spiritual disease, of which they were unconscious ; and for which therefore they neither desired nor sought a remedy. But He thought fit to administer caution and re proof indirectly, in order that their gentle and insinuating- application might prove so much the more influential*1. He allowed, for the moment, a contrast to be drawn be tween the righteous — the morally healthful — and their brethren, the sinners, the spirit ually infirm and sick. The former He en deavoured, by the attraction of His own ex ample, to gain over to a candid interpretation of the offences — to an indulgent commise- d Note SS. SERMON VI. 149 ration of the circumstances, of their less happy fellow-creatures. He was aware that the sympathy, which He strove to awaken, would gradually and imperceptibly but in evitably lead to the discovery that they them selves, partakers of one common nature, were also sharers of the same sorrows, heirs of the same imperfection, and liable to the same errors and failings. He intended that the distinction, on which He insisted, between moral purity and legal strictness, should serve to indicate to those, who were confessedly ir reproachable in respect of the latter, that they might still be wanting in the former. Above all, His plain and open statement of the express purpose, for which He had come into the world, was likely to fix the intent observation of all upon His Person and upon the office, which He assumed; whilst the merciful and gracious nature of that avowed purpose could hardly fail to melt the affec tions of all hearts towards Him. No hearer would willingly be excluded from the num ber of those, whom so exalted an Instructor had come down from Heaven to teach — whom so skilful and so benevolent a Physician sought to heale. Nor was our Lord's method of reply and of defence suited to His first and e Note TT. L 3 150 SERMON VI. immediate hearers alone. It nearly concerns all who have learned — all who shall hereafter learn, His lessons of meekness and of charity: it is well adapted even to our own case and may yield warning and instruction to our selves f. Subdued and softened by the Divine Redeemer's care for sinners, we are taught to cherish within our breasts the secret con sciousness that we too are included in that number — a consciousness, in itself, indeed painful and oppressive — yet freed from the bitter anguish of despondency and rendered a salutary principle of activity and of amend ment, by virtue of that disclosure of rich mercy, from which it takes its origin. We are admonished that, if we have enjoyed ad vantages of information and of virtue, above many of our brethren, it becomes us to make a thankful acknowledgment of the undeserved goodness, which alone has caused the differ ence. Nor can we give a better or a more decisive proof of our real thankfulness than by endeavouring to follow, although it must be at an humble distance, the example of con descension and of kindness, which our Sa viour has, in this instance, plainly set before us. He has shewn that intercourse even with the bad is a duty, which we owe to them and f Note UU. SERMON VI. 151 which we may discharge without injury to ourselves. Retirement from that world, which He blessed with His presence and with His unwearied efforts of benevolence, would im ply a conceit of our own merits or a super cilious contempt of our brethren, which He, by His practice and by His vindication of that practice, has both discountenanced and condemned. Still are we ever to carry with us into society one important caution, of which our great Exemplar stood in no needg. The declared purpose of His coming into the world was to "call sinners to repentance" — and for the accomplishment of this purpose, He possessed the high qualifications of freedom from all taint of sin and of a nature not liable to its contagion. Our lowlier destiny is to undergo a course of discipline and of proba tion, that may repair the ruins of our fallen state, aid the natural weakness of our moral powers, and impart to our oft-repeated efforts the fixedness and constancy of virtuous habits ; and it is in the fulfilment of this, our own destiny, that we are, each one of us, in his proper station, expected and required to con tribute by our example and our influence, towards the improvement of our fellow-crea tures. With a view to their improvement, it s Note VV. L 4 152 SERMON VI. is manifest that we must hold intercourse with them ; but then only can we carry on such intercourse profitably to others and with out disadvantage for ourselves, when we re member that it is by no means free from danger. Occasions will arise, when we may well shudder for our safety ; nor among the least perilous will be those, into which we may have been led by a sincere and honest desire to do good ; and upon which we may have entered with a firm resolution to main tain our own principles. From occasions of this sort it will be the part of prudence some times to retire, lest our own weakness, mistaken for the call of duty, expose us unnecessarily to " the wicked, who lay wait, as he that set- " teth snares, who set a trap and catch men h." But if escape from the position of danger be impossible ; if the retreat, which prudence re commends, be not practicable ; then may we hope to be secure from injury, even in the midst of danger; and one of the best means of security we shall find in a steady and devout contemplation of our Lord and Saviour, holding intercourse with sinners for their welfare, and never, for one moment, unmind ful, in their company, of the sole end, which He proposed. His holy example, thus sea- h Jer. v. 26. SERMON VI. 153 sonably present to our minds, will exert a pow erful influence ; and will, moreover, prompt an earnest prayer, which He will vouchsafe to hear and answer, that His "grace may be suf- " ficient for us — that His strength may be " made perfect in our weakness'." The second of those occasions, which are to be considered in the present Lecture, is re corded by St. Luke alone in the Seventh chap ter of his Gospel. We there read that an enter tainment was given to our Lord in the house of a Pharisee, named Simon, and that " a wo- " man in the city, which was a sinner, when " she knew that Jesus sat at meat in the Pha- " risee's house, brought an alabaster box of " ointment " and bestowed its contents on the person of our Redeemer, with every accompa nying action that could signify her sense of guilt, her hope of pardon and her reverence for His character and office. Before Him she felt that her sins were open, without her own confession ; and from Him, without any words of prayer, she implored their forgiveness. The thoughts of the Pharisee went to disparage not so much the moral purity as the prophetic discernment of his guest. He deemed the woman unworthy of the reception, with which she had been indulged ; and was ready to con- 1 2 Cor. xii. 9. 154 SERMON VI. elude that he had himself overrated the skill and penetration of the Teacher, whom he had evidently already learned to regard as inspired. " This man, if he were a Prophet, would have " known who and what manner of woman " this is that toucheth him ; for she is a sin- " ner." Such was the reflection, which Simon probably owned to have been passing in his mind, after he had been astonished by the proof, which our Lord immediately gave, of its injustice and error. Of that proof it is for us extremely difficult to conceive any thing like the full force and value, when it was at first afforded. Who indeed, even then, could duly estimate it, save the Pharisee himself, to whom our Saviour spake ? By the answer returned to his own unuttered reasonings ; by the exposure of his inmost thoughts, he must have been instantaneously persuaded that himself — his guests — and " the woman, " which was a sinner" — were all alike open to the inspection of a Teacher, who was truly inspired — of One, who was indeed a Pro phet. " Jesus answering said unto him : SimOn, " I have somewhat to say unto thee. And he " saith : Master, say on. There was a certain " creditor, which had two debtors, the one " owed five hundred pence and the other fifty. SERMON VI. 155 " And when they had nothing to pay, he " frankly forgave them both. Tell me there- " fore which of them will love him most ? " Simon answered and said : I suppose that he, " to whom he forgave most. And He said " unto him : Thou hast rightly judged. And " He turned to the woman and said unto Si- " mon : Seest thou this woman ? I entered " into thine house : thou gavest me no water " for my feet ; but she hath washed my feet " with tears and wiped them with the hairs " of her head. Thou gavest me no kiss ; but " this woman, since the time I came in, hath " not ceased to kiss my feet. My head with " oil thou didst not anoint ; but this wo- " man hath anointed my feet with ointment. " Wherefore I say unto thee : Her sins, which " are many, are forgiven ; for she loved much ; " but to whom little is forgiven, the same " loveth little." This passage has a deep pathos and an ex quisite tenderness, scarcely elsewhere equal led, certainly nowhere surpassed, even in the Sacred Volume. The felicity of the intro duction, which is courteous, yet awakening ; the appositeness of the imaginary case, put in the Parable ; its irresistible force, which at once drew forth from the Pharisee him self the intended moral; — these circum- 156 SERMON VI. stances, in themselves highly interesting, yet fall far short, in effect and moving influence, of the incidents that follow. With mild aspect turned towards the woman, whom Simon had harshly judged, our Saviour solicited the attention of His host ; and by means of a contrast, consisting of a series of particulars rising one above another in beauty both of conception and of language, did am ple justice to the proofs which she had af forded, of repentance and of grateful affec tion ; and so defended His own acceptance of her respectful offices of zeal and kindness. — No longer could the Pharisee entertain a doubt respecting our Lord's perfect know ledge " who and what manner of woman she " was " that had approached His Person. It was in the very character of a large debtor to Almighty God — of a grievous sinner — that she had received the encouragement, of which Simon had deemed her, by reason of that cha racter, to be unworthy ; but to the intuition of Jesus Christ was open also that " broken " and contrite heart," of which Simon could perceive only such outward tokens as might to any but the all-seeing eye prove deceitful. When Jesus said unto her : " Thy sins are " forgiven : — Thy faith hath saved thee : Go " in peace " — the same astonishment, which SERMON VI. 157 had been excited by His use of the same lan guage, on an occasion already noticed in a preceding Lecture, was again renewed ; and " they that sat at meat with Him began to say " within themselves : Who is this that for- " giveth sins also ?" — In attempting to return a satisfactory answer to this question, Simon and his guests were undoubtedly beset with many difficulties, of which we are unconscious. By ourselves may be clearly discerned, in the Person of our Lord and Saviour, that High and Holy Being, against whom the sins of men are committed ; and to whom the debt ors of five hundred and of fifty pence are alike accountable ; nor is it until the whole trans action has been illustrated by the light, which the doctrine of the Divine nature of Jesus Christ throws over it, that its true purport can be fully apprehended or its practical use fulness be duly felt and experienced k. The occasion, which I shall notice as third in order of this Discourse (without reference to order of time, which is immaterial to my purpose) is, like the last, furnished by St. Luke only. It is that, on which a man, named Zaccheus, a chief among the Publi cans, who was rich, " received our Lord joy- " fully1." Among the attending crowd, which k Note WW. ' St. Luke xix. 2-10. 158 SERMON VI. was evidently great, the result of our Savi our's unsolicited proposal to visit the house of Zaccheus and of His immediate execution of His gracious design, was a general mur mur of disapprobation and dissatisfaction. " And when they saw it, they all murmured, " saying that He was gone to be guest with " a man that is a sinner." There is much reason to believe that the sinister representa tion thus given of the character of Zaccheus was owing to prejudice against the order of men, to which he belonged. It was a hasty and inconsiderate application of that sweep ing censure, which, however natural and even just it might be with regard to the whole class, was yet not fit to be pronounced in discriminately of all the individuals of that class. Widely different were the principles, on which Jesus Christ formed His estimate of character and conduct ; and Zaccheus was, in this instance, happy in being subjected to a scrutiny, which adverted to all the pro prieties of his especial case. Of that exact scrutiny however he was not aware, until he heard the unexpected summons : " Zac- " cheus, make haste and come down ; for to " day / must abide at thy house." Unable to catch a sight of Jesus passing, " for the press, " because he was little of stature," he had SERMON VI. 159 run before and climbed up into a sycamore tree. What then must have been his amaze ment — how strong the emotions of his bosom, when he heard the voice of Jesus calling him by name and accompanying the call with an anticipation of his wishes and with a free and spontaneous offer to gratify and more than gratify, his fondest hopes of " seeing " Jesus, who He was !" " To day I must " abide at thy house." " Welcome but mys- " terious words !" (so may we interpret the Publican's secret thought) " What is that " necessity, of which Thou speakest ? What " necessity in this case can there be, save " that which is created by Thy overflowing " goodness — by Thy intention of meeting " and of fulfilling my earnest desires — and " of bringing even to my house those glad " tidings of salvation, of whose messenger I " ventured to seek only a passing and a dis- " tant view ?" Zaccheus, by stating probably his practice in time past rather than his re solution for the future, called forth the ap probation and the blessing of his illustrious guest : " Behold, Lord, the half of my goods I " give to the poor ; and if I have taken any " thing from any man, by false accusation" — if in the discharge of my official duties, I am 160 SERMON VI. misled by the false information of my de pendents — "I restore him four-fold m." "And " Jesus said unto him : This day is salvation " come to this house ; forsomuch as he also " is a son of Abraham. For the Son of man " is come to seek and to save that which was " lost." This address was doubtless uttered in the hearing of many, who had cast unmerited reflections on Zaccheus. It intimates that there had been nothing in the employment of a Publican to forfeit for him that com mon privilege of the children of Abraham, of which the Scribes and Pharisees were apt to boast ; it announces a general purpose of loving-kindness and of mercy, within which all orders and all individuals of the human race are for ever to be included. There still remains to be noticed a fourth occasion, on which the Scribes and Pharisees urged an objection against our Lord, on the ground of receiving sinners and eating with them. It occurred before that one, which has just been considered ; but is purposely taken last in order, for the convenience of devoting the conclusion of this Lecture to an exami nation of those Parables, by which Jesus met " Note XX. SERMON VI. 161 and answered the murmuring complaints of unfair and prejudiced judges of His con duct. Of this occasion also we gain our know ledge from St. Luke alone, who, in the words of the text, informs us that " then drew near " unto Him all the Publicans and sinners " for to hear Him. And the Pharisees and " Scribes murmured, saying : This man re- " ceiveth sinners and eateth with them n." It appears that, without other explanation or defence, our Lord at once delivered a se ries of three Parables, for His own vindica tion and for the reproof of His adversaries. And of these Parables it will scarcely be de nied that, by reason of their clearness, ap propriateness and force, they were eminently calculated to serve His two-fold purpose. A review of them will contribute towards the farther elucidation of those principles of in terpretation, which have been deduced from our Lord's own practice ; and will thus con firm the account that has been already given of the general and main design of the Para bles of the New Testament. The first of the three is that of the lost sheep ". The imagery of this Parable is fami liar to every reader of Holy Scripture, in " St. Luke xv. 1,2. ° Ver. 3—7. M 162 SERMON VI. various portions of which it is beautifully employed. Our Saviour is recorded to have borrowed from it several touching illustra tions ; and in one passage of St. Matthew's Gospel p, it appears in the form of a perfect Parable. In the same form, but as uttered on a distinct occasion, St. Luke here repre sents Christ to have used the same imagery, and to have introduced.it with the suitable language of personal appeal to the hearts of His hearers : " What man of you" — which of yourselves — " having an hundred sheep" — ? The Shepherd's anxiety for the lost sheep — His perseverance in the search after it — his care to lay the wanderer, either worn with fatigue or in danger of going astray yet again, upon his shoulders — his secret joy on his homeward journey — and the increase of that joy, among his friends and neighbours, after his arrival at the fold — all these details disap pear from the application, for which however they prepare the way and of which they also heighten the effect : " I say unto you that " likewise joy shall be in heaven over one sin- " ner, that repenteth, more than over ninety " and nine just persons, which need no re- " pentance." It is to be lamented that out of this affect- P St. Matt, xviii. 12 — 14. SERMON VI. 163 ing application irrelevant and unprofitable discussions have sometimes arisen. It has been asked whom our Lord meant by the ninety and nine sheep that remained secure within the fold; whether or not among the sons of Adam are to be found those just per sons, who are pronounced by Him to need no repentance ; and how it has happened that He intimates so great a disproportion of num bers as that of ninety-nine to one; and as cribes to the shepherd a livelier joy, on the recovery of that one than in the safety of the rest ? The proper answer to these and all si milar questions is that our blessed Lord de signed not to settle nor even to allude to them. Because the Parable is constructed in agree ment with that condition of our finite nature, which permits not more engrossing objects than one to be entertained at the same time, we are not therefore to conclude that any part of its intended lesson depends upon cir cumstances inseparable from such structure. It is enough for us to know, on our Saviour's own authority, that all who stand in need of repentance are indicated by the lost and wan dering sheep; and that for the purpose of recalling them to safety and happiness His Parable was spoken ; since by its means, He not only explained and defended the inter- m 2 164 SERMON VI. course which He actually held with sinners but also proclaimed His everlasting concern for the disobedient and the wilful. What ever may be believed or imagined respecting other beings, under God's moral government — whether among creatures of a rank and order similar to our own or belonging to some higher department of the universal dominion of the Father of all, there exist those, who may be denoted by the sheep, that have never left the fold — that have enjoyed, because they have deserved, the uniform and unabated love of the Heavenly Shepherd — whatever may be determined on such points as these, we, at all events, must feel — or if we do not yet feel, we must, sooner or later, be brought to the wholesome, although painful, feeling that " all " we like sheep have gone astray ; we have " turned every one to his own wayq." The following Parable of the woman having " ten pieces of silver and losing one of them1," by an agreeable variety of illustration, accom plishes the same ends of vindicating our Sa viour, and of unfolding the riches of the Divine mercy, which His intercourse with sinners was meant to display. By the cir cumstances of lighting a candle, of sweeping the house and of seeking diligently, our in- q Note YY. ' St. Luke xv. 8—10. SERMON VI. 165 terest and sympathy in favour of the woman are awakened ; and when we have entered into that joy, which induced her to call her friends and neighbours together, we listen once more to the welcome words : " Likewise, " I say unto you, there is joy in the presence " of the angels of God over one sinner that " repenteth." Again we hear, nearly in the same terms as before, the glad assurance for all sinners, that their recovery diffuses, through the regions of Heaven, a joy, aptly shadowed forth, although inadequately repre sented, by the strong feeling pictured in the Parable; and of this assurance we acknowledge the full value, when we reflect that we owe it to the lips of Him, who, having " come from " Heaven, testifieth" concerning heavenly things " what He hath seen and heard8." In the preceding instances we have found that the irrational animal and the inanimate drachma hold their proper places ; still with that decorum, which ever marks the Parables of the Son of God, and which consists in absti nence from a frequent practice of the most re nowned Teachers by Parable, the practice of ascribing the speech or the actions of man to inferior beings or lifeless objects. But in the third instance, which now claims our notice', s St. John iii. 31, 32. ' St. Luke xv. 11—32. M 3 166 SERMON VI. our Lord passes altogether into the pro vince of human sentiments and human be haviour. The Parable of the Prodigal Son may well be called a wonderful passage of the Holy Gospels. It has been left by its Author, without one word of comment or of reflec tion, to produce its own effect and make its own impression. Touching, as it does, the finest chords of those feelings, which belong to the parental and the filial relations, it utters, in tones that none can refuse to hear, the welcome tidings of the compassion of our Heavenly Father. The main purpose here, as in the former cases, undoubtedly is to jus tify our Saviour's practice and to shew how well calculated that practice was to illustrate and to magnify the Divine Mercy towards the most ungrateful and grievous sinners. Accordingly, a domestic scene is laid, which, alas ! too often finds its sad resemblance in the world of real life around us. The younger son of a disappointed Father, wilful, way ward and wasteful, is permitted to follow the bent of his own inclinations, until hardships and misfortune bring leisure for cool reflec tion and bitter regret for his misconduct. Sorrow gives birth to a resolution to return, in the guise and with the language of an SERMON VI. 167 humble suppliant, to that home, which he had wantonly abandoned. He is met by a father, whose love had never failed and whose eye had followed him even in his wanderings ; welcomed with warm affection ; and treated with such open and public demonstrations of joy as the uniform duty and steady obedience of the firstborn of the family had never called forth. The elder son — his absence in the field — the communication made to him of his brother's return — his momentary anger — his respectful, yet querulous expostulation — all these are circumstances, true to nature and warranted by experience — finely imagined and exquisitely put, with a view to heighten the effect of the reception given to the returning Prodigal. They are incidental only ; they have their use, which however is but subordinate ; by dwelling on them, as if they were designed to teach any important truths, we shall be diverted from the scope and purport of the whole Parable. If any where, in the wide extent of the family of God, there be found sons, who have not neglected their own duty nor failed to fulfil their Almighty Father's purposes, they are to remember that their case is not injuriously affected by the merciful mode of dealing adopted towards the sinners of our race. m 4 168 SERMON VI. " Son, thou art ever with me and all that I " have is thine." We are rather concerned in that abounding goodness, which declares : " It " was meet that we should make merry and " be glad ; for this thy brother was dead and " is alive again ; and was lost and is found." In the Father's watchful eye, eagerly catching the first distant glimpse of his son's return ; in the same Father's readiness to interpret the act of return into a sufficient evidence of sincere repentance — are to us set forth and represented the favourable regards of our Father, which is in Heaven, towards our selves, His disobedient and unthankful chil dren. When, from bitter experience, we have learned the unsatisfactory nature of those earthly pleasures, which first tempted us to abandon the shelter of God's house and ser vice ; — when vexation and suffering have ren dered distasteful sources of enjoyment, which we had fondly hoped to find always fresh and for ever unfailing ; — when excess of indulgence has deprived us of the means of farther gra tification or robbed us of that keen sensi bility, to the preservation of which a true relish for the best blessings of life is owing; even then may we betake ourselves into the presence of God with hope and confidence. We may be assured that He will " receive us SERMON VI. 169 " graciously u." In every instance of our Sa viour's condescending intercourse with sin ners, we are encouraged to perceive a proof that He came expressly to fulfil the purpose of His and our Father, by recovering His lost children, by restoring them to the privi leges of His house and their inheritance — by diffusing, through the courts of heaven and among the hosts of angels, a joy, that may be figuratively represented but must be inade quately described, by the purest and the strongest emotions, of the human breast. With reluctance I observe that in the case of this Parable, as in that of the lost sheep, curious speculation has often been busily and as often unprofitably employed. Without tak ing notice of expositions, applications and in ferences, which a profound reverence for the Sacred Word must incline every sincere be liever to pass over in silence, I will content myself with remarking that there has been among Commentators a very general agree ment that our Lord, whatever may have been His primary and principal object, does, at all events, in this passage, anticipate the future preaching of the Gospel to the Gentiles ; and the animosity that would thus be excited u Hosea xiv. 2. 170 SERMON VI. among the chosen race of Israel. In this view — in an application or improvement of the passage for such a purpose — it may be allowed that there is nothing materially wrong — nothing worthy of serious blame or likely to be productive of serious mischief x. I will however venture to suggest a doubt whether such a view as this would ever have occurred, if it had not been for associations, which other plain passages of our Saviour's teaching, wherein reference is undeniably made to the rejection of the Jews and the call of the Gentiles, have supplied. It would seem to have no proper place here and is in danger of withdrawing attention from those sublime disclosures of Infinite Mercy, which God Incarnate has been pleased, in this passage of His teaching, to open to man kind. Whenever we step beyond the strict line of interpretation, which He has clearly marked out for us, we stand in need of being controlled by a salutary recollection that His benign communications were not granted to furnish occasion for our fond disputes or idle fancies ; nor can we be sufficiently thankful that, in the pages of the Holy Gospels, those communications remain for us in their in- x Note ZZ. SERMON VI. 171 tegrity and that they will for ever remain, the means, if we rightly understand and use them, of impressing on our memory and on our hearts a just and lively image of the Friend of sinners. SERMON VII St. Matthew xix. 16. And, behold, one came and said unto Him : Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life f IN a preceding Lecture it was observed that our Lord was always easy of access to His disciples and ever ready to comply with their requests for a fuller knowledge or a clearer illustration of His doctrine than He was pleased to give to the generality of His hearers. The Gospel History farther shews that He was not difficult of approach for any, who sought religious instruction and guidance with sincerity and earnestness of mind or under circumstances which afforded a fair opportunity of delivering, for the edifi cation of themselves and of others, the plain and direct precepts of the Divine Law. The mixture with better motives of some desire to explore His wisdom and to try His preten- SERMON VII. 173 sions to the character and office of a Teacher sent from God, by the test of the correspond ence of His principles and rules with the de clared will of God — is not found to have hin dered Him from granting, on certain occa sions, a decisive and satisfactory answer to such as approached and questioned Him. An instance occurs in the case of that Lawyer, of whom St. Luke makes mention, as having stood up and tempted Him, by asking : " Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal " life3?" Theproposer ofthe question was refer red to the Law, with which he was courteously presumed to be already familiar ; and, when he had drawn from its provisions and enact ments a brief summary of Morals, that did credit alike to his judgment and to his feel ings, He received such authoritative appro bation, command and promise as became an Inspired interpreter alone ; and as best be fitted the Author and Giver of the Law, so interpreted and enforced. " Thou hast an- " swered right : this do and thou shalt live." The lawyer's farther question, which he is reported to have asked from a wish to justify himself — a wish at the least implying that his attention had been arrested and his curi osity to hear more from our Saviour's lips a St. Luke x. 25. 174 SERMON VII. had been awakened — drew forth that Parable of the good Samaritan, concerning the imme diate effect of which we learn nothing ; but of which we cannot believe that it proved altogether unprofitable even for him, to whom it was primarily addressed. St. Matthew and St. Mark agree in relating another instance similar to that, which has been recorded by St. Lukeb. When our Lord had by His skill disappointed the malicious intent of the combined Pharisees and Hero- dians ; when, by the few words of His pure and simple statement, He had cleared His doctrine of the resurrection from those mists of error, which the gross conceptions of the Sadducees threw around the whole subject of a future state ; when He had traced their grievous mistake to its true sources — an igno rance of the Scriptures and a forgetfulness of the power of God — pointing, at the same time, to a passage in those Sacred Writings, which themselves acknowledged, where they might discover the reality of a world of spirits ; and intimating that the Divine power could be at no loss to accomplish whatever the nature and purposes of that world might require ; it was when our Lord had thus signally triumphed over the arts of insidious adversaries and the b St. Matt. xxii. 35 ; St. Mark xii. 28. SERMON VII. 175 imagined difficulties of men of corrupt minds that "the multitude were astonished" and that from " certain" of the Scribes was extorted an acknowledgment : " Master, thou hast well " said." Nor " durst they," as a body or in ge neral, "after that, ask him any question at " allc." One however of their number — a Scribe — having probably a juster reliance than the rest on the goodness and condescension of the Teacher, whose success in reasoning with the Sadducees they had all admired ; but still himself also influenced partly by a desire to put the skill, of which he had witnessed the display, to a farther trial, came forward and asked : " Master, which is the great command- " ment in the law ?" " Which is the first com- " mandment of all ?" The answer returned to this inquiry was direct and express, consisting of a Summary, in all respects, similar to that, which, when it was uttered by another, our Lord approved and sanctioned. It was by the Scribe declared to be in perfect harmony with his own persuasions ; and of him our Sa viour's voice pronounced : " Thou art not far " from the Kingdom of God. And no man" — not an individual, " after that, durst ask Him " any question d." On the contrary, He availed Himself of the occasion of becoming, in His c St. Luke xx. 40. d St. Mark xii. 34. 176 SERMON VII. turn, the questioner; and of reducing the Pha risees to a difficulty, from which they found it impossible to extricate themselves— a diffi culty, the feeling of which was calculated to render them outwardly at least somewhat humbler and more modest than they were ac customed to appear. Unable to reconcile the language of David in the Psalms with their ex pectation of the Messiah's descent from David, they were afraid of risking any answer ; and desisted from farther attempts to annoy by dis putes and cavils Him, whom they discovered to be equally well armed for His own defence and for their defeat. We may imagine that the greater number of them withdrew from His pre sence in an irritated temper of mind — under the influence of dissatisfaction with themselves andof anger against their calm Rebuker — vexa tious and stinging feelings, which probably led many of them to take part in the murderous machinations, that soon afterwards seemed to be successful. Some however would still remain within hearing, when, " in the audience of all " the people," He addressed " to His disciples" an emphatic warning against the Scribes, on account of their ambition and hypocrisy ; and presently afterwards speaking to the multitude and to His disciples, pronounced that Dis course of severe reproof and terrible denunci- SERMON VII. 177 ation, which is contained in the Twenty-third chapter of St. Matthew's Gospel. In that awful chapter appear to be brought together and in one continued series repeated, all the reproofs, expostulations and threatenings, which the Scribes and Pharisees provoked our merciful Redeemer, through the whole course of His ministry, to utter. The desola tion, foretold and anticipated, is that very ruin, which Moses from a remote distance saw, as the final event of the fortunes of a nation, that was to be privileged above others but would prove " void of counsel" and destitute of " understanding6." We are however made to feel and to confess that a Prophet, greater than Moses is here. The figure of " an eagle, " stirring up her nest, fluttering over her " young, spreading abroad her wings, taking " them, bearing them on her wings f" — is the illustration, which Moses employs to set forth the Providential care and guidance of Jeho vah — the only Lord of Israel ; but it is to Himself that our Saviour Christ appropri ates an illustrative description of the same Divine Providence, fraught with yet tenderer associations : " How often would /have gather- u ed thy children together, even as a hen e Deut. xxxii. 28. l Deut. xxxii. 11, N 178 SERMON VII. " gathereth her chickens under her wings — " and ye would nots !" In the two instances of our Saviour's reply to inquirers after the import of the Divine Law and the way to eternal life, which have now been considered, we have been led to ob serve His discernment of the motives of those, who approached Him ; His gracious approval of whatever was good, His condescending al lowance for what was still imperfect, and above all, His readiness to impart those les sons of religious wisdom, which all His hear ers and His followers for ever might apply to practice. To ourselves is the Moral law re commended in the terms of that comprehen sive summary, which he in the one instance authoritatively sanctioned, and in the other plainly stated and declared. On our hearts and consciences are its precepts enforced by His injunction and promise. That we may obey His injunction and gain the fulfilment of His promise, He has vouchsafed to grant the ministry and the ordinances of His Church and, through them, by His Father's gift and at His own intercession, the effectual aid of the Holy Spirit. A third instance of application to our Lord, on the part of one, who was not of s St. Matt, xxiii. 37. SERMON VII. 179 the number of His disciples, is in some re spects not unlike the two, which have been already noticed. It is certainly not less suit ed than they are to the purpose of unfolding our blessed Saviour's manner of teaching; and of setting before us that union, in His case, of high endowments and qualities, which is elsewhere unexampled ; and which, being in harmony with His Divine nature, is not well reconcilable with any lower supposition concerning Him. I allude to the case of that young ruler, of whom St. Matthew, St. Mark and St. Luke h all furnish us with a detailed narrative. The circumstances will be best learned from a comparison of the three ac counts ; of which that of St. Mark would seem to be the fullest and the most accu rate. This event happened on the return of Jesus Christ towards Jerusalem from His last journey of beneficence through the coun try on the eastern side of the river Jordan. It is St. Matthew who mentions the age of the applicant, for, at the close of his narra tive, he speaks of him, as a young man. St. Luke incidentally adds the particular of his rank and consideration among his country men, introducing him to the notice of his h St. Matt. xix. 16. St. Mark x. 17. St. Luke xviii. 18. N 2 180 SERMON VII. readers under the name of " a Ruler" — a name probably equivalent to the title of " Ruler of " the synagogue," which occurs elsewhere in the New Testament and denotes a condition of high respectability among the Jews of our Saviour's day. His wealth is both implied and openly stated by each of the Evangelists. St. Mark, indirectly and by the becoming ac tivity and eagerness of youth, sets before us that season of life, which St. Matthew has ex pressly mentioned : " There came one run- " ning." The posture, into which he threw himself in the presence of Jesus and the form of salutation, which he used, indicated a most hopeful temper of teachableness and humility : " He kneeled to Him and asked " Him : Good Master, what shall I do that I " may inherit eternal life ?" The question proposed was the most momentous of all questions that could possibly be asked. For tunately for the young Ruler, it was, on this occasion, addressed to an Instructor, whose knowledge and whose goodness ensured a satisfactory answer. Our Saviour's eye seems from the first to have detected in the youth who knelt before Him, the imperfection of views and of character, which was yet con sistent with a sincere desire of information and guidance. He was aware that He had SERMON VII. 181 Himself been approached only as a human Teacher, entitled above others to profound respect and implicit confidence. Of His Di vine nature this applicant neither had nor could reasonably be expected to have, any clear notion. The compassionate Redeemer seized the opportunity, too precious in His account to be neglected, of conveying such instruction and admonition as His hearer could well bear. Receiving therefore the address in the sense, in which it had been offered, and disclaiming even for Himself the title of " Good Master," He appears to have intended, by the happiest art of insinuation and by an indirect method, which could in flict no wound on the most sensitive mind, to correct the fault and amend the imperfec tion, which He discerned. The young Ruler was evidently possessed of a somewhat high opinion of his own virtue and goodness — an opinion too agreeable and too fondly cherish ed to be at once surrendered, if an open at tempt were made to expose its vanity and emptiness ; yet was the Moral Teacher, whose assistance he implored, under an absolute ne cessity of endeavouring to remove so serious an obstacle in the way of improvement. With an union of kindness and of prudence ad mirably calculated to insure success — in a n 3 182 SERMON VII. manner, surprising, yet easy and felicitous, the attempt, in its own nature difficult and full of hazard, was at once made. " Jesus " said unto him : Why callest thou me good? u There is none good but one, that is, God1." We can readily imagine the train of profit able reflection, likely to be occasioned by this unexpected rejoinder. The Ruler's fa vourable estimate (an estimate naturally be longing to his years k) of his fellow creatures and of himself fully justified the epithet, which he had employed in addressing our Saviour. The fame of the miracles and of the Discourses of the great Prophet, who was now drawing near to the close of His short but wonderful career, had reached the ears and had produced a deep impression on the mind and heart of one, who is, in this in stance, found gladly and eagerly to have embraced what was probably for him the earliest opportunity of personal intercourse and actual observation. Nor can we doubt that, on his near approach, our Lord's de portment and language confirmed every pre vious sentiment of respect and reverence. " Do I not here see" (thus he must have been inclined to ask) " a man more worthy of " being called good than any other of the ' Note AAA. k Note BBB. SERMON VII. 183 " sons of men, whom I have ever beheld ? " Yet even He rejects the title ; and on a " principle of universal application, which re- " quires that the same title be withheld from " every individual of the human race." Could he do otherwise than pass from thoughts like these to a reflection on his own case — to an examination of his own hitherto undisputed, and, as he supposed, indisput able, pretensions to a name, which he was now charged with having inconsiderately applied? Thus might he be gently and gradually led to discover that he had been in the habit of overrating his own merits. Thus might he learn to distrust the accuracy of that report of his moral and religious character, which the voice of society, seconding his own desire to be on good terms with himself, had loudly and confidently given. An acknowledgment of the possibility that he might have been misled or mistaken with regard to himself was, in his case, the first, the indispensable step towards improvement; and it was the natural tendency of the language which he had heard to carry him thus far. Here then we are called to admire a display of the same goodness and wisdom, which have been al ready observed in connection with the me- n 4 184 SERMON VIL thod of teaching by Parables. For the ac complishment of His gracious purposes of softening unpalatable truths and of convey ing salutary lessons of reproof, our blessed Lord was by no means limited to that par ticular method. Besides metaphor, allegory and Parable, He had at His command, and employed, whenever He saw fit, other effica cious means of winning attention, of fixing thoughts too prone to wander, and of in sinuating instruction, that might otherwise fail of its effect. In the conspicuous instance now before us, He overlooked His own real dignity and glory : having been accosted as man, He was pleased to reply as man; and so laid down a general principle, of which He left the easy and obvious, but important, ap plication to His hearers, and especially to that one hearer, who was principally concerned. The passage, thus understood, presents not a shadow of inconsistency with the doctrine of our Lord's proper Divinity. For Himself He disclaimed the title of good, only when that title was given and applied by one, who ap proached and regarded Him, as man; and for whose seasonable admonition the dis claimer was as benevolently intended as it was wisely accommodated. For Himself, as SERMON VII. 185 God, He, on His own expressly stated prin ciple, reserved both that and every other title, which of right belongs to God1. Having thus gently, yet effectually pre pared the way, Jesus proceeded to furnish that instruction, which had been respectfully solicited and which He perceived to be honestly and sincerely desired. To the ques tion : " What shall I do that I may inherit " eternal life ?" the plain answer was re turned : " If thou wilt enter into life, keep " the commandments." Anxious to under stand the right meaning of the precept and apparently expecting to hear of some pecu liar strictness of rule — some characteristic observance, which he had persuaded himself to believe that he was ready at any cost of labour or of expence to adopt and practise, the Ruler inquired : " Which command- " ments ? of what sort or class of command- " ments dost thou speak ?" Again probably was the answer widely different from that which had been anticipated. " Thou knowest " the commandments. Do not commit adul- " tery — Do not kill — Do not steal — Do not " bear false witness — Defraud not — Honour " thy father and mother." Or, in one short sentence, " Thou shalt love thy neighbour as i Note CCC. 186 SERMON VII. " thyself." A kind and conciliatory spirit similar to that, already in a former instance noticed, was shewn in the assumption here made of a previous acquaintance with the Moral law on the part of this new disciple ; but without dwelling on this feature of the narrative, I pass at once to a remark, which is more appropriate to the purpose of the pre sent Lectures. We may here perceive the tokens of a sublime simplicity, which we can not but confess to be worthy of a Divine In structor. There was nothing, in the terms of our Lord's answer, to astonish and, by astonishing, to gratify and engage the mind of a promising convert. There was no at tempt, by novelty of system or by the pro posal of some untried expedient, to dazzle his sight or to entertain his imagination. All was stated to be beforehand well known ; all was plain and practical. Unlike the wise men and the philosophers of this world, Jesus " sought not His own glory but the "glory of Him that sent Himm" — of His heavenly Father, whose laws He emphati cally repeated and strongly enforced, with no other end in view than that, for the glory of God and the welfare of mankind, they might m St. John vii. 18. SERMON VII. 187 be remembered, understood and obeyed. The commandments of the Second Table were, in the first place, enumerated: nor without good reason ; since the outward conduct in social intercourse and daily life, which they are de signed to regulate, furnishes the most ob vious and the readiest indications of charac ter ; and therefore fitly becomes the earliest subject of inquiry for one, who would se riously enter upon the work of self-examina tion. The discovery of any open dereliction of duty in these instances — of any one per mitted sin — warrants and indeed calls for, a sentence of condemnation against ourselves ; and " if our heart condemn us, God is greater " than our heart and knoweth all things11 ;" if our own deliberate judgment of our cha racter and conduct be unfavourable, we may be assured that the all-seeing God, who has made conscience, in some sort, His represen tative within our bosoms, will ratify that sen tence. It does not appear that he, whose case we are considering, had reason to charge himself with immoral conduct — much less with an allowed and habitual course of sin. His reply was ingenuous and expressive of an honest and well-grounded confidence : " And " he answered and said unto Jesus ; Master, n 1 John iii. 20. 188 SERMON VII. " all these have I observed from my youth. " Then Jesus, beholding him, loved him." The latter words, which we read in St. Mark's narrative alone, imply that our Lord, in fix ing on the youthful Ruler a steadfast eye of interest and of affection, beheld the happy results of sound instruction and of a careful and judicious course of moral and religious training. These results were, in His view, lovely ; and by causing His exalted testimony in their favour to be recorded in the Gospel History, He has for ever encouraged the na tural guardians and guides of youth to spare no pains — to put forth their utmost, their unwearied efforts in the momentous task of such education as may win for the objects of their solicitude His approbation and blessing. For those, who have enjoyed the privilege of being brought up " in the nurture and admo- " nition of the Lord0" — whose tender age has escaped many of the snares and has been shielded from the worst dangers of a sinful world, our Saviour, in this example, supplies both encouragement and warning. He inti mates that the first-fruits of their life are an offering, which He graciously accepts ; but of them He loudly demands, as of the young Ruler He demanded, that the harvest of 0 Ephes. vi. 4. SERMON VII. 189 their riper years be also presented as an holy sacrifice to God. " Then Jesus, beholding him, loved him " and said unto him : One thing thou lack- " est : Go thy way ; sell whatsoever thou hast " and give to the poor, and thou shalt have " treasure in heaven : and come, take up thy " cross and follow me." Pity was mingled with the love of the Omniscient Teacher, who discerned the deficiency of that virtue which He had approved ; and who saw that the time was now come for applying a test that would not fail to prove decisive. It was in internal and truly religious principle that the young Ruler fell short. He was wanting in that love of God, which is the fulfilment of all the commandments of the First Table ; — in that supreme regard for the Divine au thority — in that sincere and abiding desire to promote the Divine glory — which must be the source of all social virtues that are to be entitled to a final reward — and which imparts to them, even here below, a lustre and an usefulness not otherwise belonging to them. Accordingly, he was subjected to a severe, although undoubtedly, in his particular in stance and at that peculiar crisis of the affairs of Christ and His followers, a necessary, trial. He was called, by selling his posses- 190 SERMON VII. sions and distributing them amongst the poor, to abandon the advantages of an enviable lot — the wealth and rank — the consideration in society, flowing, by Providential appointment and for the true welfare of mankind, from wealth and rank — the ease and pleasures, of a prosperous fortune. He perceived not — he could not for the present be persuaded of, the necessity of this sacrifice. Notwithstand ing that earnest desire of learning with cer tainty how he might inherit eternal life, which had brought him into our Saviour's presence; notwithstanding his lowly deference to the authority of the Teacher, whom He had of his own accord resolved to consult — he seems to have cherished a fond hope that his object might be attained in some other way than that which was proposed to him. His feeling bore some resemblance to that of Naaman, the Syrian, when he asked : " Are not Abana and " Pharpar, rivers of Damascus, better than all " the waters of Israel? May I not wash in them " and be clean p?" — Like Naaman, he too had probably thought himself prepared for some great achievement or some noble enterprise ; — until our Saviour's test was applied, he had deemed his affection for earthly interests and objects, inferior to his regard for the Supreme P 2 Kings v. 12. SERMON VII. 191 Being — subordinate to his desire of future and eternal happiness. " And he was sad at that " saying and went away grieved ; for he had " great possessions." Or, according to the stronger expression of St. Luke, "When he " heard this, he became very sorrowful." His grief in departing invests the whole scene, which the Evangelists have described, with a deep but melancholy interest. Grief, marking his air and countenance, was the natural andthe affecting expression of a mind half-resolved — reluctant to quit an Instructor, whose wisdom and benevolence he was compelled to acknow ledge — yet unable to act on the suggestions, which that Instructor had vouchsafed to grant, at his request. When Jesus is stated to have " looked round about," before He spake to His disciples, we may imagine Him to have recall ed Himself from the last lingering regard of compassion, with which He" had followed the youth, retiring from His presence. Who is not inclined to follow him with a like regard and to indulge a thought that he may possibly have gained afterwards the moral strength, in which he was deficient; and that he may have become finally a faithful disciple of our Lord? From this passing and momentary thought, however, we are called to a very differ ent reflection. It is not likely that in the few 192 SEXRMON VII. days, which intervened before the crucifixion, he had again an opportunity of listening to the voice of Christ ; and the silence of the Gos pel History, checking our curiosity with regard to his future proceedings and his ultimate de termination, conveys a solemn and impressive warning that from ourselves privileges neg lected or abused may be for ever withdrawn. Our Lord Himself at once passed to a practical use and application of the incidents, which had engaged His attention. He " looked " round about and saith unto his disciples : " How hardly shall they that have riches enter " into the Kingdom of God ! And the disci- " pies were astonished at His words." Their's doubtless was a mixed feeling of surprise and of regret that their Master should, by this re flection, intimate that there was neither for Himself nor for them any fair prospect of aid from worldly power and riches, towards the establishment of His kingdom. Perceiving their astonishment, He added a condescending explanation of that, which had at first ap peared harsh, and had evidently proved un welcome : " Children, how hard is it for them " that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom " of God ! It is easier for a camel to go " through the eye of a needle than for a rich " man to enter into the kingdom of God."— SERMON VII. 193 When however neither the endearing mild ness of this address nor the material change of phrase in describing those, of whom He spake, had overcome the uneasiness originally caused by His words and now prolonged by that strong proverbial language, which the three Evangelists have reported, He urged, in final answer to all objections and difficulties : " With men it is impossible but not with God : " for with God all things are possible." From this whole passage then we learn that it was an undue trust in riches — an entire reliance for true happiness on the advantages of a pros perous fortune — a devotion of the soul to worldly interests and enjoyments — against the danger of which our Lord and Saviour uttered His solemn warning. He saw that the young Ruler's heart could be effectually disengaged from earthly entanglements and set at liberty to fix itself on heavenly objects, only on the condition of abandoning his possessions : such therefore was the condition, which He pre scribed. He was aware of the near approach of the time, when " the things concerning " Himself were to have an end 4;" and He knew how ill the advantages and the pleasures of this life would at that crisis consist with a profession of His religion — with an entrance 1 St. Luke xxii. 37- o 194 SERMON VII. into His kingdom ; and therefore was it that He demanded of His youthful and promising hearer, at the outset, that sacrifice, which every sincere and faithful disciple would soon be required to make. When the lesson of our Divine Instructor is repeated in our ears, we are to remember that it is for us modified by the altered circumstances of the Church and of the world. He undoubtedly bids us also " take up the cross and follow Himr," and by these words, reminds us that there are duties of self-denial, which we are called to practise ; that there are principles, maxims and laws of society, by which, as Christians, we must firmly refuse to be guided ; that, in spite of the pre vailing profession of true religion and the con sequent amelioration of the manners and the institutions of civil and domestic life, still there is around us a world, whose " friendship " is enmity with Gods" — a world, which we must forsake and renounce, if, by " perfecting " holiness in the fear of God1," we are desirous of becoming " meet to be partakers of the in- " heritance ofthe saints in light". " And, here is it that the scene of our Saviour's ministry, which has been passing under review, has an especial interest for all such as resemble the r St. Matt. xvi. 24. s St. James iv. 4. t 2. Cor. vii. 1. u Col. i. 12. SERMON VII. 195 young Ruler in age and in external circum stances. In the ranks of " the mighty and the " noble x" — among those, to whom the talents of wealth and of influence have been already or are likely soon to be entrusted, are there any youthful disciples, who wisely rejoice in the title and the privileges of their Christian inheritance ? who have approached their Sa viour in a teachable spirit, and, having pro fited by His sacred lessons, have formed — are now ready to avow — a firm purpose of glory- fying God in their lives and of "laying up " for themselves treasures in heaven, where " neither moth nor rust doth corrupt and " where thieves do not break through and '*' stealy ?" Then will they be disposed, with lowliness of mind, to listen to the terms and conditions of the Master, whom they intend to serve. He does not bid them " sell whatsoever they have and give to the " poor." He does not demand of them, for His sake and in the cause of His Kingdom, the sacrifice of property, of station and of con nections. But in the same spirit, which dic tated His address to the young man ofthe Gos pel History, their God and Saviour asks of them hearts disengaged from the world, in the midst of which they are yet to live ; affec- * 1 Cor. i. 26. y St. Matt. vi. 19, 20. o 2 196 SERMON VII. tions elevated above the objects and the af fairs, with which they are to be daily conver sant ; hopes and desires fixed on the substan tial and eternal, although unseen, realities of Heaven. Are they prepared to comply with the demand ? Or are they, at some moments, ready to withdraw, grieved at a saying, which appears to them to disparage the blessings of life and to cast a gloom over that fair pros pect of the future, which is beginning to open before them ; and which their sanguine tem per, not yet controlled by disappointment, tells them that they may be sure of realising ? In such moments of hesitation and of doubt, it will be well for them to remember that the Teacher, before whom the young Ruler knelt, was God as well as man — God, condescend ing, in the Person of His Son and through the veil of human nature, to manifest His tender compassion and His boundless love. He then prescribed — He now prescribes no conditions, except such as are indispensably requisite. He then enjoined — He now en joins no precepts, except such as are, in their tendency and effects, the instruments and means of real happiness ; oi perfect and eter nal happiness hereafter ; and even of that earthly happiness, which alone deserves the name. It is by setting too high a value on SERMON VII. 197 the goods of fortune, the rewards of patriot ism and of valour, the prizes of talent and of industry, that the worldly man deprives them of their natural power to yield satisfaction and converts them into so many occasions of vexation and annoyance. The obedient and faithful disciple of Jesus Christ learns to es timate arightthese objects of universal pursuit. He aims not at them by any methods, which can tarnish the glory or lessen the comfort of their possession. He sets not his heart upon them, when he is permitted to find that they are the result of honourable conduct and of laudable pursuits. Welcoming them, even then, as the unmerited gifts of God's good Providence, he is conscious that he holds them on a tenure, for himself indeed uncer tain and precarious, yet perfectly safe, so far as his highest interests are concerned, because it is dependent on the will of the Wisest and the Best of Beings. A sense of dependence like this is far from being a painful feeling : it rather forms one element of that thankful ness towards the Heavenly Benefactor, which exalts and increases every enjoyment. " Pure " and undefiled religion2" — that religion, which is founded on self-denial, and, which, keeping itself unspotted from the world, is z St. James i. 27. o3 198 SERMON VII. yet full of activity and of beneficence — has the effect of preserving in its purity and of perpetuating each source of pleasure, which God has commanded to refresh and fertilise the plains of human life. And they, who, in their early years, have " set their affection on " things above, not on things on the earth a," will, to their joy, find, as life goes on, that " Godliness is profitable unto all things ; " having promise of the life that now is and " of that, which is to come'V They will sur mount the difficulties, which for their own unassisted powers would have proved insu perable ; and looking back, at the close of their career, on the goodness and mercy, which shall have followed them all their days, they will acknowledge that, in their own ex perience, has been fully verified our Saviour's declaration : " The things, which are iropossi- " ble with men, are possible with God." a Col. iii. 2. i> 1 Tim. iv. 8. SERMON VIII. St. John xv. 15. Henceforth I call you not servants ; for the ser vant knoweth not what his Lord doeth, but I have called you friends ; for ail things that I have heard of my Father, I have made known unto you. 1 HE union of lowliness and of dignity, in the character and conduct of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, is nowhere more ap parent than in those passages of the Gospel History, which relate the particulars of His intercourse with His twelve chosen Apostles and with such other disciples as were in con stant attendance on His Person. Some inci dental notice has been already taken of this gracious and condescending intercourse ; but its details well deserve a larger share of atten tion than has yet been bestowed upon them. Simplicity and brevity mark those few nar ratives, which the Evangelists supply, of the o 4 200 SERMON VIII. first call of some, who sacrificed their worldly employments and interests, to become the followers of Christ. With their usual mo desty in all that relates to themselves or can redound to the credit of their party3, the Sacred Historians, in this instance, leave much to the reflection of each thoughtful reader. St. Lukeb lends some help to our reflection, by opening the state of Simon Peter's mind, when he had witnessed that miraculous draught of fishes, which is generally sup posed to have preceded the call of himself, his brother Andrew and the sons of Zebedee ; and which, at all events, led them, whether they had received an earlier call or not, to take the decisive step of abandoning their oc cupations and their homec. Simon's senti ment was not unlike that of Manoah, when he said : " We shall surely die, because we " have seen GoDd." It was a sentiment of awe, inspired by a consciousness of the presence — of the near approach and of the immediate influence, of a superior Being — of a Being, too highly exalted in power and in purity to admit of safe access for man, frail and sinful. " Depart from me, for I am a sinful man"— a man and, as such, a sinner, " O LoRDe." * Note DDD. b gt> Luke v. 6. <= Note EEE. d Judges xiii. 22. e gt, Lu] well assured that to them selves the privilege of confidential intercourse with their Master would not be denied. "And when He was come into the house, " His disciples asked Him privately : Why " could not we cast him out ?" A direct re ply was vouchsafed to their inquiry; and that reply was accompanied with a large pro mise of all necessary aid for the future and with a gracious apology for their past defi ciency : " And He said unto them : Because " of your unbelief; for, verily, I say unto you: " If ye have faith, as a grain of mustard seed, " ye shall say unto this mountain : Remove " hence to yonder place and it shall remove ; " and nothing shall be impossible to you. " Howbeit, this kind goeth not out but by " prayer and fasting." The unbelief, with which they were here charged, was a defect of faith, similar to that, which the humble yet confiding parent had, in his own case, acknowledged : " Lord, I believe : help thou " my unbelief." It was the same defect, of which the Apostles were themselves, on an other occasion, sensible, when they " said unto " the Lord : Increase our faith °." In the 0 St. Luke xvii. 5. P 210 SERMON VIII. instance now under consideration however their prayer was anticipated ; and, in terms nearly the same, they were on this latter, as they had been on the former, occasion, en couraged to rely on power, hereafter to be imparted, whereby all difficulties might be surmounted and all miracles achieved. The inspiriting effect of this promise derived fresh strength from the few words that were added to account for and, as it were, to excuse, their recent failure. The days of fasting had not yet arrived for the Disciples, whilst their Lord continued with them ; their delegated and derived power was less required and wanted, so long as He was at hand to make bare His mighty arm in the eyes of all ob servers. With the impressions however, which we receive from this example, of the kindness and tenderness of our Saviour's manner of holding intercourse with His disciples, must be mingled, as with similar impressions on the minds of the disciples must have been mingled, a sense of the superiority, which He ever claimed and maintained. To Him they were to look as the source of powers, which they were to employ under His direction and for the promotion of His designs; and to Him they were to be prepared to render a final account of their stewardship and ser- SERMON VIII. 211 vice. The address, which followed His reply to their request for an increase of faith, must have been, in its spirit and power, recalled once more to their minds and must have brought with it a deep impression of the obli gations, under which they were laid, to pay to Him, their Lord and Master, a faithful and unwearied service. " So likewise" (after the manner of ready and obedient servants) " ye, " when ye shall have done all those things, " which are commanded you, say : We are " unprofitable servants : we have done that, " which was our duty to do p." The miracle of the raising of Lazarus has been already noticed in a preceding Lecture. The same event may now be viewed under another aspect and may serve, in an interest ing manner, to unfold the nature and the effects of our Lord's familiar converse with His disciples. " Now Jesus loved Martha " and her sister and Lazarus q." Such are the few, but expressive words, in which St. John describes the privilege, enjoyed by this favoured family ; a privilege that seems to have excited, in the bosoms of our Lord's other followers, no emotions save those of endearment and of kindness ; since we find that when the death of Lazarus was, in plain P St. Luke xvii. 10. v ael e)(r}Te rov ®ebv Kal fx?jre abiKeiv pyyre acrefielv ap-^ade. After enumerating some particular in stances, the passage proceeds : bid tovtcdv bvo-M-n&v ipas ael pvfjprjv e\eiv tov ®eov' apa re Kal iXeyxav on ev rats Kdpbi- ais vp&v ovbe piKpav pvqprjv e'x€Te r<™ Qeocrefielv Kal ovb' ov- T- pdTtixris of Origen, where he speaks of Jesus, as tt)v Kara ILLUSTRATIONS. 233 rrjv evaapdraxriv olKovoplav vvv bi evXoyovs ahlas irXrjpbi- a-avra — (Contra Cels. VI. 78.) — a place, in which the word oiKovopia appears to be employed in its ordinary Ec clesiastical meaning ; but in which it would obviously be impossible to translate it incarnation. Upon the whole, it would seem that the remarks of Valesius (Annot. in Lib. I. Histor. Eccles. Eus. Pamph. p. 4.) give a juster account of the prevailing usage of the Fathers : Veteres Graeci olKovopiav vocant quicquid Christus in terris gessit ad procurandam salutem generis humani. Ita que f/ TTptoTr] tov XpioroC oiKovopia est incarnatio ; sicut postrema oiKovopia est passio. Errant enim qui existimant ofoovopiav nihil aliud significare quam incarnationem ; quippe longe latius patet vox oiKovopia et totam Christi inter ho mines vitam complectitur. Some observations of Dr. Herbert Marsh, Bishop of Peter borough (Lect. on the Crit. and Interpret, of the Bible, XI. p. 487-489 of the Edition of 1828) connect the oiKovopia of the Fathers with what has been known, in modern phrase, under the name ot accommodation. — Mr. Newman (in p. 71- 87 of his Work on the Arians of the Fourth Century) recog nises the same connection. He dwells at some length on the principles of interpretation /car olKovoplav, as well as on the actual employment and legitimate use of such interpretation; but is careful to supply some cautions, by which it should be regulated. The whole subject, opened by Mr. Newman in this portion of his Work, deserves a fuller consideration than is on the present occasion possible; but it is here no ticed for the purpose of remarking that, whatever decision may be formed respecting the nature and the allowable extent of the interpretation, of which he treats, there is cause for much hesitation, before it can be granted that the language of the Fathers expresses the meaning of modern Divines. It would seem to be under the influence of this reasonable hesitation that the Bishop of Lincoln (p. 398- 403 of his Account of the Writings of Clemens of Alexan dria) has furnished a long list of passages from the Works of Clemens, in which the word oiKovopia and its conjugates occur for the sake of shewing that the authority of that 234 NOTES AND Father in particular, has been erroneously quoted in sup port of a mode of interpretation /car' oiKovoptav. A careful examination of the passages, indicated by Bishop Kaye, un doubtedly renders it quite evident that Clemens's use of the language in question has no reference whatever to that sys tem of accommodation, to which the terms of the ancient Church are, in our own times, often applied. An exami nation of the same passages farther shews the natural and gradual transition of certain terms from their usual accep tation to a stricter, an Ecclesiastical and, as we may not im properly call it, a technical sense. In many of the alleged passages, Clemens employs oiKovopia, oiKovopeladai, k. t. X. according to the ordinary use of the Greek language ; whilst from other passages, and, as every reflecting reader will surely be inclined to say, from several of the number, it is clear that the same words had already gained and were beginning to be restricted to a properly Ecclesiastical meaning. A service, similar to that which the Bishop of Lincoln has in this instance rendered to the cause of sound Theology by vindicating the language and sentiments of Clemens, might, it is apprehended, be easily and with advantage rendered in the case of the principal of those Fathers, whose names have been associated with an interpretatio Kar oiKovopiav. From a consideration then of that, which, in the un doubted language of the Primitive Church, is called' the Economy or Dispensation, a twofold advantage may result, according to two distinct views that present themselves to the mind. On the one hand, such actions, language and sufferings of our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ, as ap pear, at first sight, inconsistent with His Divine nature, may be satisfactorily explained ; whilst, on the other hand, such rays of Divine greatness and glory as are discerned through the veil and covering of His Flesh may be ac counted for and may become the objects of devout contem plation. The two views are closely connected with each other; and both have been unfolded by the primitive Writers ; although of the two, the former, for reasons ob vious to every one conversant with their Remains and with the history of the prevailing errors, which they had to op- ILLUSTRATIONS. 235 pose, more frequently and more fully engaged their atten tion. The present Lectures will be employed in some developement ofthe latter view. Note F, p. 12. apev epyov Ibelv pXeirerai be ov povov Kara to, jtxa/cdptot ol KdOapol rfj Kapbiq, oti avrol tov ®ebv o-^rovrar aXXa Kal Kara to Aeyo- uevov virb rrjs eiKovos tov aopdrov ®eov iv rco, 6 eapaK&s ipe ecopa/ce tov irarepa tov irepifravTa pe. Nor/eras rts ovv ir&s bei dKoveiv irepl povoyevovs deov vlov tov ®eov, tov irpa>TOTO- kov irdo~r]s KTicreas, KaOori 6 Xoyos yeyove crdpf, 6\\reTdi ir&s Ibdtv rts rTjj> eiKOva tov aopdrov 8eov yvdaeTai tov irarepa Kal iroir\TT]v Tovbe rov irdvros. Ibid. 43. Cum ergo in eo (Domino et Salvatore nostro) quae- dam ita videamus humana ut nihil a communi, id est mor- talium fragilitate distare videantur, quaedam ita divina ut nulli alii nisi illi primo et ineffabili in se conveniat Deitati habere, humani intellectus angustia, tantae admirationis stu- pore percussa, quo declinet et quo se convertat ignorat. Si Deum sentiat, mortalem videt. Si hominem putet, devicto mortis imperio cum spoliis redeuntem a mortuis cernet. 236 NOTES AND Propter quod cum omni metu et reverentia contemplandum est, ut in uno eodemque ita utriusque naturae Veritas de- monstretur ut neque aliquid indignum et indecens in Divina ilia et ineffabili substantia sentiatur, neque rursum qua? gesta sunt falsis illusa imaginibus existimentur. Qua? qui dem in aures humanas proferre et sermonibus explicare longe vires vel meriti nostri vel ingenii ac sermonis excedit. Arbitror autem quia etiam sanctorum Apostolorum super- grediatur mensuram : quin immo etiam fortassis totius cre- aturas ccelestium virtutum eminentior est sacramenti istius explanatio. Ilept 'Apx&v, II- 6. The translator, to whom we owe almost all that remains of this work, may have been a Paraphrast as well as a Translator ; yet may we well believe that, in this instance, the general sentiments are those of Origen. These passages will serve for specimens of the manner, in which one distinguished Father of the third century speaks on the general subject of these Lectures. They are quoted in the hope of drawing the attention of every stu dent, who is desirous of becoming a well-informed Theolo gian, to the work, from which they are taken. The name and writings of Origen have experienced the fate of being both too highly extolled and too severely reprobated and condemned. And for this fate it is per fectly true that his great merits and eminent services in the cause of Christianity, on the one hand — his grievous errors and glaring faults, in the interpretation of the Sa cred Volume, on the other, may account. The defence of this renowned champion of our common faith belongs not to the present undertaking. It has been conducted by able hands; and has triumphantly shewn that much of mistake, of misrepresentation and of unfairness has mingled with the exceptions justly taken against his doc trines and reasonings. Neither are the works that pass under his name to be equally and indiscriminately re commended. They have all been more or less subject to corruption and adulteration ; and even if this had not been the case, there are considerations urged by the learned and candid Bp. Bull, of which no student should lose sight: ILLUSTRATIONS. 237 Si omnia Origenis scripta, eaque pura et incorrupta, hodie extarent, haud omnia tamen verae ac genuinae ejus senten- tiae declarandas pariter inservirent; scilicet variorum auc- toris iroXvypacpov operum diversa foret ratio. Nam alia ad amicos secreto scripsit, quae lucem nunquam visura spera- vit; in quibus libere ac pene sceptice disseruit ac plerum- que non tam suam certam ac definitam sententiam quam vel aliorum ratiocinationes vel suos quosdam scrupulos ac du- bitatiunculas, ad clariorem veritatis elucidationem, propo- suit. Alia ipse in publicum emisit, sive contra infideles sive adversus haereticos, seu denique ad instruendum ple- bem Christianam ; in quibus, via trita ac tuta incedens, re- ceptam in Ecclesia Catholica doctrinam studiosius tradidit. Deinde alia properanter dictitavit, alia diligentiori cura elucubravit. Denique alia (ut Huetii verbis utar) senex Adamantius, ingenio per a?tatem magis subacto, elimavit ; alia, efferente sese in juventutis aestu fcecunditate, profu- dit. De quibus praeclare dixit Hieronymus in Prologo ad Com. in Lucam, Origenem in quibusdam tractatibus, quasi puerum, talis ludere ; alia esse virilia ejus et alia senectutis seria. Def en. Fid. Nic. II. ix. 3. Of the Eight Books against Celsus, Bishop Bull pro nounces : Hos praeter librariorum o-o-ev eavrbv vlbv ®eov etvai' el yap pr] r)X6ev iv crap/ct, ix&s av ecrco- Orjpev avOpariroi, fiXeirovTes avrov ; oti tov peXXovra pr) elvai rjXiov, epyov )(etpfiz; avrov inrdp\0VTa, fiXeirovTes ovk icrxvovo-iv eis dKTivas avrov dvTov ®eov Kal irplv ivav6pa>irrjaai Kal evavdpia- TTTjcras dirobeiKwrav iyai be (pr]pi on Kal pera rr)v ivavdpdrrrr]- criv del evpio-Kerai rots exovcriv 6(f)6aXpovs \^u)(t]s o^vbepKeard- tovs Beoirpeireararos Kal dXr]6&s deodev irpbs f]pds KareXd&v. Orig. c. Cels. III. 14. The same Author elsewhere speaks of the Son as irepiaipovvros dirb tov irarpos to Xeyopevov ctko- tos, o edero diroKpvs avrov r) bo£r]s reAetas diroarr] irT(i>xevaas irXovcrios &>v, tovto iyevero" dAA' 'iva Kal tov ddvarov virep r)p&v t&v apap- tcoX&v dvabi£r]Tai, oY/catos virep dblKa>v, oircas f)pas irpoo-aydyr] rc3 ©e<3, davardideh pev crapKi, Coircir]6els 8e irve'vpari. S. Petri Alexandrini Frag, apud Rei. Sacr. Vol. III. 344. Exinaniens se Filius, qui erat in forma Dei, per ipsam sui exinanitionem studet nobis Deitatis plenitudinem de- ILLUSTRATIONS. 241 monstrare Exinaniens se Filius Dei de aequalitate Pa- tris et viam nobis cognitionis ejus ostendens, figura expressa substantiae ejus efficitur : ut qui in magnitudine Deitatis suae positam gloriam mira? lucis non poteramus aspicere, per hoc quod nobis splendor efficitur, intuendse lucis Divina? viam, per splendoris capiamus aspectum. Orig. de Prin. I- ^ — 8. This quotation is placed after the preceding, because it is not perfectly safe to assign it to a remoter anti quity than the age of Rufinus. Note I, p. 20. " I use the Scripture, not as an arsenal, to be resorted to " only for Arms and Weapons to defend this Party or defeat " its enemies ; but as a matchless temple, where I delight to " be, to contemplate the beauty, the symmetry and the mag - " nificence of the Structure ; and to increase my awe and " excite my devotion to the Deity there preached and " adored." Hon. R. Boyle's Consid. touching the Style of Holy Scripture, p. 78. Note K, p. 21. Praeter has tres Christianorum sectas (videlicet Carpocra- tianos, Cerinthianos et Ebionaeos) nulla alia a Scriptore ali- quo Ecclesiastico commemoratur, qua? Justini aetate vel prius Jesum nostrum hominem tantummodo esse ex homi- riibus genitum doceret. Reliqui fere istorum temporum haeretici, qui de Christi persona male senserunt, veritatem humana? in ipso naturae impugnarunt. Bull. Judicium Ec cles. Cath. VIT. 8. Note L, p. 22. " Would to God the necessity never had arisen of stating " the discoveries of Revelation in metaphysical propositions ! " The inspired Writers delivered their sublimest doctrines in " popular language and abstained, as much as it was possible " to abstain, from a philosophical phraseology. By the per- " petual cavils of gainsayers and the difficulties, which they " have raised, later teachers, in the assertion of the same " doctrines, have been reduced to the unpleasing necessity of " availing themselves of the greater precision of a less fami- " liar language." Bp. Horsley s Sermon on ihe Incarnation, p. 318 and 319 of Tracts in controversy with Dr. Priestley. 242 NOTES AND Vid. also in p. 458 and 459 of the same Vol. an admirable passage on " the extreme caution, which should be used to " keep the Doctrine of the Trinity, as it is delivered in " God's word, distinct from every thing that hath been de- " vised by man or that may even occur to a man's own " thoughts, to illustrate it or explain its difficulties." Bp. Bull often wrote in a kindred spirit : In hae rerum caligine, de hoc (rrjs Treptxcopr/crecos scil. mys- terio) aliisque mysteriis Divinis, tanquam pueri et sentimus et loquimur, imo balbutimus potius. Hic dum sumus, Deum nostrum tanquam in speculo et aenigmate contem- plamur. Adveniet vero tempus, imo omni tempore et sa?- culo ulterior aeternitas, qua ipsum videbimus, facie ad fa- ciem. Tenebras omnes tunc a mentibus nostris fugabit beatifica Dei visio; qua ut nos tandem dignos efficiat Di vina misericordia, ipsam noctes diesque obnixe et supplices oremus. Interea, dum viatores sumus, cognoscere optamus potius quam liquido cognoscimus, ut doctissimi Athenagora? (in Leg. pro Christianis) verbis utar, rfc r\ rov riatoos irpbs rov Tlarepa kvorns' ris r; rov Ilarpos Trpos tov Tlbv Koivcavia' rt ro Tivevpa' ris r) t&v too-ovtuv eWcris /cat bialpeais kvovpe- vwv, tov Tlvevparos, rod PlatSos, rov Ylarpos. Defen. Fid. Nic. IV. iv. 14. ad fin. See also of the same work, III. ix. 12. in init. and IV. i. 9. ad fin. Note M, p. 26. On this text, as quoted in the precious fragments of the Epistle of the Churches of Vienne and Lyons to those of Asia and Phrygia, Dr. Routh observes: Quomodocunque interpretanda sint verba, ovx dpiraypbv y]yf]o-aro to elvai tcra ©ecp, hoc quidem constat, Lugdunenses ex illis argumentum duxisse rrjs Taireivocppoo-vvrjs Christi. Neque vero hi soli id fecerunt ; sed et alii multi veteres Scriptores : imo vero id suscipere velim, nullum Ecclesias- ticum auctorem ad Nicaenorum usque tempus adduci posse, qui significari to non alienum a se esse arbitratus est verbis orjx' dpiraypbv r/yqararo, clare atque aperte indicaverit. Haud- quaquam tamen id fraudi est firmissimo argumento contra Humanistas quos vocant, ex istis verbis Apostoli sumendo. Rei. Sacr. Vol. I. p. 328. ILLUSTRATIONS. 243 Bp. Bull's remark on the same text is short but emphatic: Qui unus locus, si recte expendatur, ad omnes ha?reses adversus Jesu Christi Domini nostri personam repellendas sufficit. Def. Fid. Nic. II. ii. 2. See also his Prim. Trad. de Jes. Christ. Div. VI. 21. Origen, having quoted the same text, remarks : Ovrca peya boypa to irepl Taireivoabpoo-vvris io-rlv, as pr) tov rvxdvra bibdo-KaXov exeiv irepl avrov aXX' avrov Xeyeiv rov ttjXikovtov r)p&v crcorrjpa, pddere air ipov, oti irpqos elpi Kal raireivos rfj Kapbiq /cat euprjcrere dvdiravo-iv rats \jrvxais vp&v. Contra Gels. VI. 15. And in another place, he observes : Air iKeivov ('l-ncrov, scil.) rfpgaro Bela Kal dvOpairlvr) avv- v(j*aiveo-0ai cprjcrts' lv r) avdpwirtvr] rfj irpbs ro dewrepov koi- vo>viq yevr)rai Oeta ov/c iv pi6vvru>v Kal veKp&v. Kal ov belrjpas piKpa qbpovelv irepl rrjs o-a>rr)pias 7jp&V ev rc5 yap poveiv rjpds piKpa irepl avrov, piKpd /cat iXiri(fipev Xafielv /cat ot aKOVovres wairep piKp&v, apapravopev, ovk eibores irodev eKXr]dr]'j.ev Kal viro rivos Kal ets ov roirov /cat oaa virepeivev 'Irjo-ovs Xptcrros iradelv eveKa r)p&v. Sti Clementis Rom. Ep. ad Cor. II. init. The Symposium of Methodius contains the following statement of the Divine example, as proposed in our Sa viour's human nature : Tarrrrr rjperlo-aTO rr)v dvBpanrivqv ivbvcrao-dai crapKa ©eos coz> (scil. 6 Aoyos) oira>s ibo-irep ev irlvaKi Oeiov iKrviriopa fiiov j3Xe- irovres eya>pev Kal rjpiis - bv ypd'tyavra pipeZcr6ai. Sti Method. Symp. I. as quoted by Grabe, in his Annot. in Def. Fid. II. xiii. 11 and by Dr. Burton, in his Testim. of Ante-Nic. Fath. p. 407. Note N, p. 28. Succumbat humana infirmitas gloria? Dei ; et in expli- candis operibus misericordiae ejus, imparem se semper inve- niat. Laboremus sensu, haereamus ingenio, deficiamus elo- quio : bonum est ut nobis parum sit quod etiam recte de Domini majestate sentimus! Sti Leonis M. in Serm. XI. de Passione Domini. The same becoming sentiment is more concisely but not less forcibly expressed in the language of an early martyr : Kdyco, dvOpcoiros lav, piKpd vopifa Xeyeiv irpbs rr)v 'Irrcrov Xpt- crror? direipov Oeonqra. Such were the words uttered by Justin Martyr, in that good confession, which he made be fore the Boman Governor, and which immediately preceded the event related in the following passage : Ot dytot pdprvpes (Justin and his four companions) bo£d- foires tov ®eov, ifceXOovres eirl tov o-uvi]6r] roirov, direrpr)6r]- aav ras /cecpdAas /cat ireXeia>o-av avr&v rr]V paprvplav, iv rfj rov Samjpos opoXoylq' rives be t&v ttio-t&v Xadpalas avr&v ra cr¶ Xafiovres, KareOevTO ev roVco iirirr]bel&, arvvepyao-do-r)S avrols rrjs xapiros tov Kvpiov fip&v Irjcroi/ Xptororj, to t) bo£a ILLUSTRATIONS. 245 ets tovs al&vas t&v aidvwv. 'Aprjv. (Acta Martyr. S. Just. et Soc.) p. 586 Oper. Note O, p. 30. Interrogemus ipsa miracula quid nobis loquantur de Christo ? Habent enim, si intelligantur, linguam suam. Nam quia ipse Christus Verbum Dei est, etiam Factum Verbi, Verbum nobis est. Sancti Aug. Horn, in Ev. Joan. cap. 6. Tract. 24, in init. St. Ambrose, to the same effect, says : Dominica? carnis actus Div initatis exemplum est; et invisibilia nobis ejus, per ea quae sunt visibilia, demonstrantur. Com. in Luc. c. 4. v. 24. The following passages are added in farther illustration of the same view : Ovbepla avdyKr] rots vovv f)(ovo~t,v, i£ &v perd ro ftdirrio-pa 6 Xptoros eirpa£e, irapiurqv ro dArjtles /cat acpavrao-rbv rrjs i/fi)Xrjs avrov Kal rov adtparos, Trjs /cat? ftpas avdpo)irlvr]s cprjcrecos' to. yap perd to /3dimcrpa viro XptaroS irpaydevTa (cat p-dAta-ra to. o-ripeia, tt)v avrov KeKpvppevvv iv (rapid ©eo'rrjra ibrjXovv Kal iirio-Tovvro rip Kocrpua. ©eos yap wv opov re Kal dvdponros reXeios 6 aires, ras bvo avrov ovalas eirio-rdo-aro rjp.iV rrp> pev ©eo'rrjra avrov bid t&v o-r)peia>v iv rfi rpterta rfj perd to fidir- no-pa, tt)v be di^pcoTrdrrjra avrov, iv rots rpidKOvra XP°V0^ rots •ffpo tov pairrio-paTos" iv oh bid ro dreAes to Kara crdp/ca direKpvfir] ra crrjp.eta Trjs avrov ©eo'rrjros" /cat irep ©eos dArjflrjs Trpoaiviosvirdpx<*v. Melitonis Frag. Rei. Sacr. Vol. I. p. 115. Td pev crrjp.eta Kal ra repara rd iv rots evayyeXiois avaye- ypappeva 6 ©eos r)v eiriTeXecras' rph apaprlas. Ex Epistola missa Paulo Samosa- tensi ab orthodoxis Episcopis, Anno Christi 269, Epistola ilia, cum pietate tum simplicitate sua se maxime commen- dante atque ilia antiquissima tempora nobis egregie referente. Reliq. Sacr. II. 465 and 494. The slight verbal amend ments of the text of this passage suggested by Dr. Routh are here without hesitation adopted. Si mediocritates in alio (Christo, scil.) adprobant hu- manam fragilitatem, majestates in illo adfirmant Divinara a 3 246 NOTES AND potestatem. Novatianus, sive Scriptor de Trin. Libri, Oper. Tertull. additi. (p. 713.) Dum in terris ageret Filius, erat ev axvpari evpeOels l>s dvOpatros, nempe merus, nihilque majus homine pra? se ferebat, nisi quod in miraculis scintillula? quaedam Divina? Majestalis per nubem humana? carnis subinde emicarent. Bp. Bull, Primit. Trad. VI. 25. Note P, p. 30. The limitation of the meaning of the word Miracle, as it is employed on the present occasion, is obvious from the first statement of the subject of this Discourse, which is to be confined to ihe wonderful works done by our Lord. That evidence, which may justly be called Miraculous, in cludes indeed all such extraordinary manifestations of the presence and power of God as have taken place on special occasions and for special purposes. Thus, the event of the appearance of the pillar of the cloud by day and the pillar of fire by night, recorded in Exod. xiii. 21, 22. is a miracle; and as such, it enters into the evidence in favour of the Revelation made by Moses. In like manner, the voice from Heaven at our Saviour's baptism — the darkness attending His crucifixion — the rending of the veil of the Temple — these are events of the Gospel History, strictly and properly miraculous; as such, they contri bute towards the proof of Christianity. The endowment of Prophetic foresight is itself miraculous ; and as such may vindicate for those, who possess it, and for those, in whom its oracles are fulfilled, the character of messengers of God. " Prophecy has been styled by some miraculum dicti.. .as " supernatural works have been called miraculum facti." Dr. Wheeler, Theol. Lect. I. 77. And although the ordi nary distinction between miracles and Prophecy, as the two leading branches of Evidence, may be conveniently ad mitted, yet is it well to remember that miracles, specifically so called, and Prophecy both come under one and the same general head of Miraculous attestations in favour of Re vealed Religion. As the youthful student is liable to se rious inconvenience from the statements on the subject of Miracles to be met with in the Works even of approved ILLUSTRATIONS. 247 Authors, one of his first duties is to furnish himself with such leading principles as may safely guide him through the details of a momentous discussion and may enable him to profit by the numerous Treatises of various Authors' that will unavoidably attract his notice and demand his attention. For this purpose, he may be referred to the Analogy of Bishop Butler, that invaluable storehouse of first principles in almost every department of Theological Inquiry ; and more particularly, to the Second and Seventh chapters of the Se cond Part of that immortal Work. With the same view may be recommended " A Treatise on the Evidence of the Scrip- " ture Miracles, by John Penrose, M. A. formerly of CCC. " Oxford." The able Author of this Work, in handling the whole subject of Miracles, has shewn himself to be no unworthy disciple of the great Prelate abovementioned. Note Q, p. 33. That condition of the credibility of the doctrines to be proved, which Mr. Penrose deems necessary towards the validity of miraculous evidence in their favour, is here omitted. Do not the Divine attributes, of which even Rea son may impart some knowledge, afford an ample security against error in this important instance ? It may be granted that there are evil spirits, possessed of super-human powers, det pev fiovXopevoi /ca/cd 7rotetz<' — but of the same beings, it is to be remembered, for our comfort, that they are ovk del bvvdpevoi bid to Ka>Xveadai. (Origen.) And we may with confidence expect that the control, which we allow to be at all times possible, will be effectually exercised for the bene volent and valuable end of protecting us against any serious danger (such danger, that is, as honesty and attention cannot obviate) of being misled and deluded in the momentous concern of Revelation. On these principles, therefore, it may be concluded that miraculous evidence, left unrefuted by any counter-evidence, is abundantly sufficient for the confirmation of doctrines, purporting to come from God, independently of any reference to the nature and character of those doctrines themselves. May it not be still farther urged that such reference fails to remove the difficulty for the sake of which it is prescribed ? Is it not possible to con- r 4 248 NOTES AND ceive that an evil Being of superior skill and power might build on le ground of truths already known and acknow ledged ar artfully contrived system, plausibly appearing perfective of all previous discoveries? And, in a case like this, where would be our security against fatal error, except in a rational hope of counter-evidence — of a plain and deci sive interference of Power really Divine, which should set at nought the pretensions of all inferior beings ? See how ever Penrose's Treatise, Ch. II. Sect. 6, where the Author unfolds and vindicates his own view. Note R, p. 34. Tori be Scorrjpos fjp&v rd epya del irdprjV aXr]6r) yap rjv ol Oepairevdevres" ot dz»acrrdi>res e/c veKp&v o^ ovk HxpOwcrav povov Oepairevopevoi Kal dvurrdpevoi dXXa /cat det irapovres' ovbe eiri- br]povvTos povov rov Scorrjpos dAAd /cat drraAAayei'ros, r/aav eirl \povov iKavov eis re Kal ets tovs rjperepovs XP°V0VS rives air&v d(piKovro. Haec attulit Eusebius, Lib. IV. Hist. cap. 3. Reliquice Sacra, vol.1. 73. See also the introductory re marks to the same fragment, as given by Grabe, in his Spi- cilegium, p. 125 of Part II. He maintains the affirmative on the question, which Dr. Routh, however, does not posi tively determine, respecting the identity of the Author of the Apology and the Bishop of Athens. Every reader must enter into the feeling, which Grabe expresses in the follow ing words : Utinam de hae Quadrati Apologia modo scribere posse- mus quod Eusebius, Lib. IV. cap. 3. eicre'ri be (peperai irapa irXelo-rois t&v abeXtp&v, drdp Kal Trap' r)plv, to avyypappa ef ov Karibelv iari Xapirpd re/cp.?jpta rrjs re rot! di>8pds biavoias /cat rrjs d7rocrroAt/crjs opdoropias. Sed periit eheu egregium istud o-vyypapp.a, nihil que ejus superest, praster unicum, brevis- simum quidem at nobile fragmentum, quod nobis conser- vavit Eusebius loco modo citato I Note S, p. 35. Dr. Paley treats expressly on this subject in Chap. 5, of Part III. of his View of the Evidences of Christianity. In that Chapter, he has noticed the passage of Quadratus, lately quoted, and some other valuable testimonies from the ILLUSTRATIONS. 249 Fathers ; but since he does not appear to have received so strong an impression as the state of the casejjWarrants of their reliance on the miraculous facts of the Gospel History for proofs of the Christian Religion, both some of his quo tations in the original languages and some few additional passages, are here submitted to the reader. Justin Martyr, in his First Apology, undoubtedly alleges the miracles of the Christian history, where he insists on them as real facts, in contradistinction, as it would seem, to the pretences of the art of Magic : Oira>s be pr] ris dvririOels r)piv, ri KbiXvei /cat tov Trap r)piv Xeyopevov Xpiarbv, avdpanrov i£ dv0p&ira>v ovra, p-aytzcrj re^^rj as Xeyopev bvvdpeis ireiroirjKevai Kal bo£ai bid tovto vibv ®eov eivai, rov air6beit~iv rjbrj iroivo-opeda, ov rots Xeyovcri iriarevov- res aAAa rots irpo(pr]Tevovo~i irplv r\ yeveo-Qai, Kar dvayKt]v irei- Oopevoi, bid to Kal o\jrei cos Trpoe(j>r)rev67) opqv yevopeva /cat yt- vopeva' virep peyiorr] Kal dArjfleordrrj a7ro'8ei£is /cat r5p.u>, cos voplCopev, ros 7rapd ©eorj iv rrj eprj/xcp, yvdaeas ®eov (in allusion to the language of Is. xxxv. which immediately precedes this passage) Trj r&v e6v&v yf] ave/3Xvcrev ovros 6 Xpiords" os /cat iv r<5 yeWi vp&v ire(j)avrai Kal rovs e/c yeverrjs /cat /card rr)v adpKa irrjpovs Kal Kuxpovs /cat x^ow Idcrdro, rdi> pev dXXeaOai, tov be Kal aKoveiv, rov be Kal bpdv rcS Adycp ai3- tov 7T0trjcras" Kal veKpovs be dvaorrjcras /cat £fjv Troiwcas, /cat bid r&v ipyutv ibva&irei tovs rore ovras avdpwirovs, iiriyv&vai av rov ol be Kal ravra bp&vres yivopeva, dpavrao-iav payiKr\v yi- veo-Qai eXeyov Kal yap pdyov elvai avrov iroXpotv Xeyeiv Kal XaoirXdvov. Dial, cum Tryph. 69- It will surely be perceived and felt that these words convey a far more decisive appeal to the works of our Lord, and a much more forcible contrast of them with the illu- 250 NOTES AND sions of Magic than the translation, adopted by Dr. Paley, would imply. One other instance of Justin's appeal to our Saviour's miracles may be added : it is from an earlier Section (35) of the Dialogue ; and is highly interesting both from the summary of the Christian evidences and from the display of Christian feeling, which it contains : "A irdayopev irdvra dvaipovpevoi viro t&v ot/cetGw, irpoelirev fjplv (6 'IrjcroSs) peXXeiv yeveaOai, cos Kara prjbeva rpoirov iiri- Xrj\j/ipov avrov Xoyov r) irpd^iv dpaiveo-9ai. bib Kal virep vp&v /cat virep r&v dXXatv airdvraiv dvOpdnrav r&v exOpaivovrav r)plv eixdpeOa' Iva perayvovres crvv r)piv pr) /3Aacrobrjp.7Jre rdi> bid re rco> epyav Kal r&v dirb rov ovoparos avrov /cat vvv yivopevatv bvvdpeaiv Kal dirb t&v rrjs bibaxvs Xoycov Kal dirb r&v irpoipr]- revdeur&v ets avrov irpo(pr]Tei&v, dpa>pov Kal dveyKX-qrov Kara irdvra Xptcrroz' 'Irjcrow- dAAa iriarevo-avres els avrov, iv rf) irdXiv yevrjcropevri ivbo£ airov irapovcrlq. crcotfrjre /cat pr) /cara- biKaadrjre ets rd irvp vir avrov. The notice taken by Irenaeus of the evasion of the here tics, which was similar to that of the adversaries of Christi anity, is mentioned by Dr. Paley, and comes after the fol lowing passage, preserved only in the Latin Translation : Ad opera producti, qua? ille (Jesus scil.) ad utilitatem hominum et firmitatem fecit, nihil tale, nee simile nee se cundum aliquid in comparationem quod venire possit, per ficere inveniuntur. Sed et si aliquid faciunt, per Magicam (quemadmodum diximus) operati, fraudulenter seducere ni- tuntur insensatos : fructum quidem et utilitatem nullam praestantes, in quos virtutes perficere se dicunt; adducentes autem pueros investes, et oculos deludentes et phantasmata ostendentes statim cessantia et ne quidem stillicidio temporis perseverantia, non Jesu Domino nostro sed Simoni Mago similes ostenduntur. Et ex hoc autem quod Dominus sur- rexit a mortuis in tertia die (firmum est) et discipulis se manifestavit et videntibus eis receptus est in caelum ; quod ipsi morientes et non resurgentes, neque manifestati quibus- dam, arguuntur in nullo similes habentes Jesu animas. Then occur the words : Et be Kal tov Kvpiov dpavraaiab&s rd roiavra ireirocnKevai ILLUSTRATIONS. 251 djrjo-ovariv, iirl rd rrpocprjrt/cd dvdyovres avTovs, ef avr&v iiri- beigopev irdvra ovtojs irepl avrov Kal irpoeipr)o-dai Kal yeyovevai /3e/3atojs /cat avrov povov elvai tov viov tov ®eov. Iren. contra Haer. 57 cap. Lib. II. From these words it is plain that the firm establishment of the matters of fact was, in Irenaeus's judgment, both in itself possible and in its bearing on his argument important. To the original of two passages of Origen, to which Dr. Paley has referred, and of the former of which Dr. Lardner has justly said that it is a " glorious answer" to the objec tion of Celsus, the student will do well to have recourse ; he will find them in Orig. c. Cels. II. 48. and I. 67, 68. In several Editions of Paley the only reference to the Greek is one, which belongs to the former place, but is incorrectly assigned to the latter. The following may be added from the same work : Mdi>ot rjpeis rd Kadap&s Kal dpiyes irpbs to \frevbos dXr]6es iv Tr) Irjcrov XptcrroS bibao-KaXlq diro(paiv6pevoi elvai, ovx eav- rovs dXXd tov bibdo-KaXov avviarapev, viro tov iirl iracri ®eov bid irXei6va>v papruprjOevra Kal r&v irpo(pr]TiK&v iv 'lovbalois X6ya>v Kal arjrrjs rrjs ivapyeCas' belKwrai yap ov/c d#eet rd rrj- At/caSra bebvvrjpevos. Ibid. V. 51. ' Airobeigopev oti dirb ®eov beborai avr& (r<3 'Irjaw) to ti- [UurQai- 'iva irdvres rip&ai tov vlbv Kad&s rip&o-i tov irarepa. al yap irpb rrjs yeveaews avrov irpo^rirelai ovardaeis rjcrav rrjs Tiprjs avrov. dXXd /cat rd vir avrov yevopeva irapdboga, ov payyavelq, a>s olerai KeAcros, dAAd Qeiorryn irpoeiprjpevr] viro t&v irpo avayeypappeva repdo-na e'n lovba'iKa, e'lre Kal irepl tov Ir]o~ov Kal r&v paQryr&v avrov, pvdovs eivai vevopiKe (6 Ke'Acros). Tt yap ovv^t rd pev fiperepd iariv dXrjdrj, a 8e KeAcros Xeyei, dvairXdo-para pvdiKd ; ols ovb EXXrjvav (piXo- crocpoi atpecrets ireiriorevKao-iv, So-irep r) ArjpoKpirov /cat r) 'Em- Kovpov /cat r) ' ApiaroreXovs' rd\a &v ireirio-revKviai bid tt)v iv- dpyeiav rots rjperepois, el iraparervxeio-av Mcoiicrrj r) nvi r&v rd irapdbo^a iroirjo-dvrav irpoiprjr&v r) Kal air£ rc3 'IrjcroC. Ibid. VIII. 45. The same Father, in another Work (Com. in Matth. Tom. XII. 2.) having assigned some probable ways of 252 NOTES AND accounting for the unbelief of the Pharisees and Saddu cees, in our Saviour's day, urges : Or) pr)v coo-re /cat o-vyyvoicrTovs elvai, pr) ivop&vras rots t&v irpo(pr]T&v Ao'yots irXvpovpevois iv rats irpaf ecri roij 'Irjcrorj, as ovbap&s irovrjpd bvvapis piprjcrao-6ai old re f}v. \jruxriv be i£eX- 8ovo-av iirio-rpe\j/ai, cocrre rjSrj o(ovra Kat rerdprvv fjpepav ayov- ra dirb t&v pvrjpelav e£eA0etz>, oibevbs r)v r) roC d/covcrai'ros dno rov irarepos' iroi-qo-apev dvOpairov Kar etKoVa Kal 6polaio-iv fjperepav. dXXd Kal dvepois /ceAewat /cat opp-qv t?aAdcrcrrjs Ao'yw TTaCcrat, ovbevbs dXXov rjv rj iKelvov, bl ov rd irdvra /cat avrr) r) OdXaacra Kal ol avepoi yeyovaaiv. ert 8e Kat rj 8t8acr/caAta iirl rrjv ayairr]v rov KTiaavros irpoaKaXovpevr), ovvabovrus vopv /cat Trpocprjrats Kat rds oppds KaracrreAAoi/cra Kat rd rjt?rj Kar evaefieiav pop(pov(ra, ti dXXo ibr)Xov rots dpai' bvvapevois r) oti dXr]6&s deov vlbs r\v 6 rd roaavra ipya(6pevos ; Arnobius treats the subject of the miraculous evidence in favour of Jesus Christ and His religion so copiously and so eloquently that it is difficult to keep the extracts from his First Book adversus Gentes within moderate bounds. In reply to the question: Deusne ille est Christus? Arnobius answers : Nulla major est comprobatio quam gestarum ab eo fides rerum, quam virtutum novitas, quam omnia victa decreta dissolutaque fatalia, qua? populi gentesque suo geri sub lu mine, nullo dissentiente, videre : qua? nee ipsi audent falsi- tatis arguere, quorum antiquas seu patrias leges vanitatis esse plenissimas atque inanissima? superstitionis ostendit. Occursurus forsitan rursus est cum aliis multis calumniosis illis et puerilibus vocibus : Magus fuit, clandestinis artibus omnia ilia perfecit, iEgyptiorum ex adytis angelorum poten- tium nomina et remotas furatus est disciplinas. Quid dicitis, O parvuli, incomperta vobis et nescia temeraria? vocis lo- quacitate garrientes ? Ergone ilia, qua? gesta sunt, daemo- num fuere praestigia?, et magicarum artium ludi ? Potestis aliquem nobis designare, monstrare ex omnibus illis Magis, qui unquam fuere per saecula, consimile aliquid Christo millesima ex parte qui fecerit ? The subject is then pursued in a glowing passage, which enumerates most of our Lord's recorded miracles, repeating ILLUSTRATIONS. 253 over and over again the inquiry : Unus fuit e nobis, qui ta- lia et tanta fecit ? Nihil, ut remini, magicum, nihil humanum, praestigiosum aut subdolum, nihil fraudis delituit in Christo, derideatis licet ex more atque in lasciviam dissolvamini cachinnorum. Sed non creditis haec gesta. Sed qui ea conspicati sunt fieri, et sub oculis suis viderunt agi, testes optimi cer- tissimique auctores et crediderunt haec ipsi et credenda posteris nobis haud exilibus cum approbationibus tradide- runt. Quinam isti sint fortasse quaeritis ? Gentes, populi, nationes et incredulum illud genus humanum. Quod nisi aperta res esset et luce ipsa, quemadmodum dicitur, clarior, nunquam rebus hujusmodi credulitatis sua? commodarent assensum. An numquid dicemus illius temporis homines usque adeo fuisse vanos, mendaces, stolidos, brutos ut quae nunquam viderant, vidisse se flngerent ? et quae facta om- nino non erant, falsis proderent testimoniis aut puerili asser- tione firmarent? cumque possent vobiscum et unanimiter vi vere et inoffensas ducere conjunctiones, gratuita susciperent odia et execrabili haberentur in nomine ? . . . . Imo quia haec omnia et ab ipso cernebant geri et ab ejus praeconibus, qui per orbem totum missi beneficia Patris et munera sanandis {munera grandia, for.) animis, hominibusque portabant, veritatis ipsius vi victae {gentes, scil.) et dederunt se Deo : nee in magnis posuere dispendiis membra vobis projicere et viscera sua lanianda praebere. Arnob. adv. Gentes I. p. 24 to 33. of the Leyden Ed. of 1651. What could the severest reasoner urge more satisfactorily? What could the warmest advocate utter more eloquently ? If any reader should be tempted, by this beautiful passage, to have recourse to the first of the seven Books adversus Gentes, (contained in that Selection from the Writings of the Fathers, which is entitled Opuscula qucedam Selecta Scrip - torum Ecclesiasticorum, and which we owe to the judgment and piety of the venerable Editor of the Reliquiae Sacra?,) he will be gratified by many other proof's which that Book above the rest contains of the success, with which Arnobius devoted the skill acquired in the Schools of Rhetoric to the cause of Christ and His Gospel. The real fault with which, as a reasoner on the Miraculous evidence, he is in 254 NOTES AND this particular Book chargeable, is, that from the Miracles of our Lord he derives a direct and immediate proof of His Divine nature. Every word of the preceding extracts admits of being used and applied by one, who keeps clear of tbis error, which, common to Arnobius and others of the same age, must at all events be allowed to be in the opposite extreme to that omission of the argument from Miracles now under consideration. S. Petrus Alexandrinus (Rei. Sacr. vol. III. p. 346.) holds the following language : Kdt rco 'lovba cprjert' cptArjpart tov viov rod dvQp&irov irapa- btbas ; ravra, rd re tovtois opoia, rd re o-qpeia irdvra a iirol- ¦qae koi al bvvdpeis beiKVVcriv avrov ®ebv elvai evavQpa>Trr]o-av- ra' rd crwaptcpdrepa roivvv belKwrai' on ®ebs rp) (pvcrei, Kal yeyovev dvOpanros opiKr)v habere, ut referatur ad Psal. lxxxii. quern ver. 34. citaverat Christus,) ideo tantum quod imperii atque authoritatis divina? imper- fectam quandam in se imaginem referrent, dii appellantur ; quanto magis ego, qui naturalis Dei Filius, atque insuper excellentissima ratione a Deo Patre authorizatus sum, Dei Filius, adeoque Deus vocari possum ? Caeterum hoc ipsum Christus disertis quidem verbis non dixit, sed non obscure significavit in verbis, Mene, quern Pater sanctificavit et mi sit in mundum. Non enim (N. B.) dicit, Mene, quern Deus sanctificavit ; sed, Mene, quern Pater sanctificavit ; in- dicans, se non ideo imprimis Deum pro Patre suo habuisse, quod a Deo sanctificatus (h. e. segregatus et designatus ad munus sibi impositum) et in mundum missus fuerit; sed contra a Deo jam Patre suo et sanctificatum, et in mundum missum fuisse. Praeterea nullus dubito quin Maldonatus in verbis, et misit in mundum, emphasin recte statuerit, qua significetur, Christum esse Dei Filium, non caeterorum modo in terra, sed in coelo natum, indeque in hunc mun dum missum. Ita enim Dominus, discipulos suos alloquens, se clarius explicat, Jo. xvi. 28. Egressus sum a Patre, et veni in mundum ; et rursus relinquo mundum, et vado ad Patrem-. Quibus verbis significasse Christum, se in potiore sua natura in ccelis apud Deum, idque ut Patrem suum, extitisse, antequam in hunc mundum primura veniret, hoc est, homo natus fuisset, nemo est, nisi cui lema Sociniana in oculis sit, qui non facile perspiciat. Confer Joan. iii. 13. Pergit vero in sui defensione Dominus, ac divinitatem, quam cum Patre communem habet, altero argumento ad- ILLUSTBATIONS. 257 struit, a miraculis suis deducto, ver. 37, 38. Si non facio opera Patris mei, nolite credere mihi ; sin vero ilia facio, etiamsi mihi non credatis, operibus tamen credite ; ut cog- noscatis et credatis Patrem in me esse, et me in eo ; q. d. Quod me Dei Patris Filium StaKptrtKcos appellaverim, adeo- que me et Patrem unum esse dixerim, ea propter blasphe- miae me postulatis. Quod quidem fortasse non immerito facere videremini, si divinitatem meam verbis solummodo, non etiam factis adstruerem. Cum vero etiam eadem om- nipotentia? opera cum Patre meo efficiam, cur me ejusdem cum ipso naturae esse non creditis ? A vobis non postulo, ut meo de memet testimonio credatis, sed ut saltern ex ope ribus meis persuasum habeatis, Patrem in me esse, et me in eo, hoc est, me et Patrem unum esse, quod ante dixi. Ex his perspicuum est, Dominum nostrum Judaeis blas- phemiae crimen ipsi impingentibus, quod se Dei Filium Sta- KpiriK&s appellaverit, seque adeo Deum esse non obscure significasset, ita respondisse, ut hoc ipsum, nempe se ejus modi Filium Dei esse, adeo non negaverit, ut fortissimis argumentis adstruxerit. Quod etiam ipsi Judaei (qui he- betes licet et stupidi satis, Socinistas, qui mortalium perspi- cacissimi videri volunt, crassissima? profecto dj3Xe\}rias con- demnent) probe intellexerunt. Hinc enim tantum abfuit, ut Christum ob hanc ipsius responsionem a crimine blas- phemia? absolverint, ut contra ipsum propterea, tanquam blasphemum, rursus de medio tollere aggressi sint. Sequi- tur enim ver. 39. Qucerebant ergo eum iterum apprehen- dere, sed exivit de manibus ipsorum. Cum evangelista dicit ovv, ergo, indicat, Judaeos illis ipsis verbis, qua? in sui de fensionem dixerat Servator noster, iterum irritatos, ipsum apprehendere voluisse, ut abductum extra templum (ubi hunc sermonem habuerat ver. 23.) lapidibus obruerent. Nam frustra omnino est Grotius, qui verba interpretatur, quasi Judaei, quod Dominus blaspbemise crimen ita sol vis- set, ut ne species quidem restaret, consilium de lapidatione tanquam in blasphemum mutarint, dederintque operam, ut eum captum traderent synedrio, aliud aliquid crimen reper- turo. Neque enim Judaei ideo Christum apprehendere vo- luerunt, ut synedrio sisterent, sed ut in locum abducerent, 258 NOTES AND ubi ipsum sine sacrilegio occiderent. Templum enim, intra cujus limites stetit ac locutus est Dominus, erat omni ex parte sacrum, neque ulla caede aut sanguine polluendum. Confer Act. xxi. 30. Praeterea vox irdXiv, iterum, satis ostendit, Judaeos voluisse rursus illud in Christum facere, quod et antea facturi erant, hoc est, lapidare ipsum voluisse ver. 31. Quo etiam in loco vox irdXiv occurrit, atque aliud porro tempus manifeste designat, quo Judaei ex simili occa- sione voluerunt Christum lapidibus obruere, de quo legere est Joan. viii. 59. Nam ibi etiam ex Christi sermone, se ante Abrahamum fuisse dicentis ver. 58. Judaei recte judi- carunt, Christum naturam quandam, in qua ante Abraha mum extiterit, hoc est divinam, sibi tribuisse, adeoque Deum se dixisse. Jud. Eccles. Cath. V. 6. Works, Vol. VI. p. 109—113. Note U, p. 46. The Greek words are : Td epya a eyco iroi& KaKeivos rroirj- aei Kal peiCpva rovra>v irocqaei. The following passage, if it may not be considered as having any weight of authority, will yet serve the purpose of illustrating the interpretation here given : 'Eyco 8' e'iiroip' av on Kara rr)v 'Irjcrorj iirayyeXiav ol pad-qral Kal peifyva ireiroirjKamv S>v 'Itjctojjs alo-0r]T&v ireiroirjKev. del yap dvolyovrai 6(pdaXpol rvcbX&v Ti]v \jruxllv' K°d 3>Ta r&v c?k- KeKOXpripevaiv irpbs Xoyovs dperrjs aKoriet irpo6vp(os irepl ®eov Kdl rrjs Trap' avrov paKapias fcorjs- iroXXol be Kal ^coAot rds /3d- crets rod (cos rj ypacprj oivopaaev) ecrco avOpdnrov, vvv rov Xoyov laaapevov airovs, ovx dirX&s dXXovrai aXX' cos eXadjos iroXe- piov r&v 6(peu>v £&ov /cat Kpelrrov irdvros lov t&v exibv&v Kal ovroi ye ol Oepairevdevres xcoAot Xap/3dvovo-iv airb 'Irjo-oS i£ov- alav irareiv rots iroalv, ols irporepov r)uav x&>Aot, eTrd^co rcoi> rrjs KaKtas 8(peu>v Kal aKopiriwv Kal dira^airX&s iirl iracrav tt)v bvvapiv rov ixdpov Kal irarovvres ovk abiKovvrai' Kpeirrovs yap Kal airol yeyovaai rov irdo-qs Kadas Kal t&v baipovatv lov. Orig. c. Cels. II. 48. The same view is taken by Origen in his 6th Homily on Isaiah, which is extant in the Latin Version only ; but it is there boldly applied as an unanswerable argument in sup port of that peculiar system of interpretation, which would ILLUSTRATIONS. 259 sometimes altogether set aside the literal sense of Holy Scripture : a system, which may be safely characterised and condemned in the strong language of one, whose profound reverence for antiquity and whose extensive acquaintance with its Remains impart to his sentence" the weight of au thority : Insania ilia Origenis et aliorum, qua? fidem historiarum Sacrarum subvertere ausa est ut mysticum adstrueret sen- sum libris Sacris. Rei. Sacr. Vol. III. p. 119. That portion of Origen's Commentaries on St. John, in which this passage was included, is not extant. Note V, p. 51. See also St. Luke vi. 17-19- The expressions employed in the Gospel History itself both account for and justify such language as Origen has not scrupled to use in the fol lowing instances : 'AAAd xat irnp&creis IdOrjaav pvplai viro rov 'lno-ov. Contra Cels. VIII. 46. Aid roS KaraXvaavros pvplovs baipovas 'lr]o-ov, r)viKa ireptrjet Idtpevos Kal eirtcrrpecpcoi' rovs Kara8in,aorei>op.ez>orjs viro rov bia- /3oAou. Ibid. 64. Note W, p. 56. 'O ©eos, reAetcos dyat?ds coz>, diStcos dya0o7roids iariv. A- thenagoras, Leg. pro Christ. XXVI. Ab eo (Jesu Christo) gesta sunt et factitata (miracula) non ut se vana ostentatione jactaret, sed ut homines duri, atque increduli scirent non esse, quod spondebatur, falsum : et ex operum benignitate quid esset Deus verus, jam ad- discerent suspicari. Christus aequaliter bonis malisque subvenit; nee repul- sus ab hoc quisquam est, qui rebus auxilium duris contra impetum postulabat injuriasque fortuna?. Hoc est enim proprium Dei veri potentiaeque regalis, benignitatem suam negare nulli nee reputare quis mereatur aut minime : cum naturalis infirmitas peccatorem hominem faciat, non volun tatis seu judicationis electio. Arnob. adv. -Gent. I. s 2 260 NOTES AND Note X, p. 62. Sicut Pater operatur, ita operator et Filius ; et imitator est Filius omnium operum Paternorum, ut perinde habeat unusquisque quasi jam viderit Patrem dum eum videt qui invisibilem Patrem in omnibus operibus semper imitatur. Nov. de Trin. XXVIII. Note Y, p. 65. See especially 2 Kings iv. where are related some of Elisha's miracles, which call for a careful consideration with a view to the point here noticed. The result of such consideration will undoubtedly be a persuasion of the justice of the contrast drawn in the following few but striking words : "Aira£ eAdArjcre Kal ov eirXacrev, rryeipev ovre yap cos 'HAtas eKXavaev ovre &s 'EAtcratos drroprjcre' povo(f)66yy(i) cpcoznj bivirvio-e rov irap avr& Kadevbovra. S. Amphilochii in Qua- trid. Lazarum Orat. Amphilochius, Bishop of Iconium, in Lycaonia, in the end of the fourth century, was the friend of St. Basil and St. Gregory Nazianzene. Of the works ascribed to him however some are confessed to be spurious, all are dubicE fidei. Note Z, p. 68. St. Augustine in his Com. on St. John, ch. vii. re marks : Magna signa facta sunt etiam cum Dominus resurrexit et ascendit in ccelum. Tunc per discipulos facta sunt mag na; sed ille per illos, qui et per seipsum. Ipse quippe illis dixerat : Sine me nihil potestis facere. Quando clau- dus ille, qui sedebat ad portam, ad vocem Petri surrexit et suis pedibus ambulavit ita ut homines mirarentur, sic eos allocutus est Petrus, quia non in sua potestate ista fecit sed in virtute illius, quem ipsi occiderunt. Note AA, p. 68. This important consideration did not escape the notice of the ancient Apologist : ILLUSTRATIONS. 261 Quid ? quod istas virtutes, qua? sunt a nobis summatim, non ut rei poscebat magnitude), depromptae, non tantum ipse (Christus) perfecit vi sua, verum, quod erat subli- mius, multos alios experiri et facere sui nominis cum affec- tione permisit. Nam cum videret futuros vos gestarum ab se rerum Divinique operis abrogatores, ne qua subesset suspicio magicis se artibus munera ilia beneficiaque largi- tum, ex immensa ilia populi mukitudine, qua? suam gra- tiam sectabatur admirans, piscatores, opifices, rusticanos atque id genus delegit imperitorum, qui per varias gentes missi, cuncta ilia miracula sine ullis fucis atque adminiculis perpetrarent Si facias ipse quod possis et quod tuis sit viribus potentatuique conveniens, admiratio non habet quod exclamet : id enim quod potueris feceris et quod praestare debuerit vis tua, ut operis esset una et ipsius, qui operare- tur, qualitas. Transcribere posse in hominem jus tuum ; et quod facere solus possis, fragilissima? rei donare et partici- pare faciendum, supra omnia sita? est potestatis continentis- que sub sese est rerum omnium causas et rationum faculta- tumque naturas. Arnob. adv. Gent. I. Note BB, p. 69- See Note D, p. 342 of Mr. Penrose's Work on Miracles, where some probable reasons for our Lord's adoption of a process of cure in any instances are given from Dr. Graves and Lightfoot. — As to the number of the instances, is it not correct to say that there are more than three ? In some of the whole number, as, for example, those recorded in St. Matt. viii. 2 — 6, (to which the parallel places are St. Mark i. 40, and St. Luke v. 12,) ix. 28, and xx. 29, the process was confined to the touching of the person of the leper and the eyes ofthe blind; in the three, noticed by Mr. Penrose, spittle also was applied ; in one of the three cases, to the decfand dumb, in the other two, to the blind. Note CC, p. 71. Orat ergo Dominus non ut pro se obsecret sed ut pro me impetret Nam etsi omnia posuerit Pater in potestate Filii, V s3 NOTES AND Filius tamen ut formam hominis impleret, obsecrandum Pa trem putat esse pro nobis, quia advocatus est noster. S. Am- bros. Com. Lib. V. in Luc. VI. 12. Note DD, p. 71. Airds icrnv to virerdyr) rd irdvra iirb rov ITarpoV ovk (ov iXdrrav tov ITarpds, r5TTep fjp&v irpoo-nv^aro. Dionys. Alex. in Resp. ad Quaest. as quoted by Bp. Bull, Defen. Fid. Nic. IV. ii. 7. Ei'iirep rots dffots rcoi> iv crapKl (&vto>v Kal pr) Kara crdpKa arparevopivbiv eixopevois, rotarrrrj ns Aeyerat viro ©eor? Trept rrjs evvjjs avr&v iirayyeXia' Kal en XaXovvros o~ov, ep&' ibov irdpeipi, rt x/wj vopi£eiv iirl rov creorrjpos Kat Kvpiov ; rj irplv AaArjcrat ere, epco" ibov, irdpeipi ; apa ydp rjpe rovs dcpdaXpovs ava Kal elire' rl be elirev ; et oldv re io-nv cos iv rotorjrots crro- xd^eadai, aKoXovOu>s rco" irplv XaXrjcrai ere, epco, Ibov irdpeipi, iva irXeiov r\ rd 7rpds rov 2corrjpa Xeyopevov irapd to ev rfj irpbs tovs biKalovs iirayyeXia yeypappevov en XaXovvros crov, ip&, ibov irdpeipi. Tt ovv elire ; irpoeOero pev elirelv evxrjV irpo- XafSovros be rr)v eixvv avrov rov eiirovros dv avr&, irplv AaArj- crat ere, epco, ibov, irdpeipi, dvn rrjs Kara irpoOeuiv av Xex&ei- crr]s evxrjs, Xeyei rrpi em rco irpoXd/3ovri rr)v evxr)v evxapicrriav Kal cos iiraKOvcrOels eep' ots ivevorjae povov, ov irpor]veyKe be iv rco erj)(eert?at, cprjert- Ildrep, evxapicrr& crot, ort i)KOV(rds pov. Orig. Com. in Joan. XXVIII. 5. The command, which followed, is thus noticed by an an cient Preacher : Ad£ape, bevpo «?£&>• 8ecnrortKrj rj epcor/rj' j3aaiXiKbv to Ke- Xevo-pa' efonertas rd irpocrraypa. bevpo e'fco- airoOepevos rrjf (pdopdv, avdXaj3e rr)v 8t' dtpdapcrlas bopdv ^Hpro 6 A£t?os, rd irpoaKoppa- (3dbi{e irpos pe tov Kakovvrd ere" 8e£po efco- cos pev (plXos crot irpocr(p(av&' cos Se beo-norrjs eTTtrdcrcrco 'O elir&v, yevrjdrjrv epeos, yevrjOijro) errepe'eo/xa, eyco crot irapaKeXev- opai. E S. Andrea? Cretensis Oratione in Lazarum Qua- trid. p. 71 of his Remains edited by Combefis, Paris, 1644. St. Andrew, Archbishop of Crete, is by Cave, in his Historia Literaria, assigned to the early part of the seventh century. Liberare a daemone et homines, sed in verbo Dei, pos- ILLUSTRATIONS. 263 sunt : resurrectionem mortuis imperare Divina? solius est potestatis. S. Ambros. Homil. in Luc. iv. 33. Tertullian justly regards and ably urges the recorded instances of prayer to the Father, offered by Jesus Christ, as decisive proofs of the distinct personality of the Son ; yet. not so as to admit of the notion of inferiority or in equality of nature, as belonging to the latter. Vid. his Tract adv. Prax. c. xxiii. Note EE, p. 81 . On this miracle Irenaeus observes, so far at least as the Latin Version represents his meaning : Peccata remittens, hominem quidem curavit, semetip- sum autem manifeste ostendit quis esset. Si enim nemo potest remittere peccata nisi solus Deus, remittebat autem haec Dominus et curabat homines ; manifestum quoniam ipse erat Verbum Dei, Filius hominis factus ; a Patre po testatem remissionis peccatorum accipiens; — quoniam homo, et quoniam Deus : ut, quomodo homo compassus est nobis, tanquam Deus misereatur nostri, et remittat nobis debita nostra, qua? Factori nostro debemus Deo. Contra Har. V. 17. And among the proofs of the proper Divinity of our Lord urged in the Tract on the Trinity, ascribed to Nova- tian and usually printed with the works of Tertullian, to which some previous references have been made in these Notes, are the following : Quod si, cum nullius sit nisi Dei, cordis nosse secreta, Christus secreta conspicit cordis ; Quodsi, cum nullius sit nisi Dei, peccata dimittere, idem Christus peccata dimit- tit....merito Deus est Christus. Tertull. Op. p. 715. Note FF, p. 84. " Though in a just idea of the Deity, perhaps none of " His attributes are predominant, yet to our imagination, " His Power is by far the most striking. Some reflection, " some comparing is necessary to satisfy us of His wisdom, " His justice and His goodness. To be struck with His " power, it is only necessary that we should open our eyes. " But whilst we contemplate so vast an object, under the s 4 264 NOTES AND " arm, as it were, of Almighty Power, and invested, upon " every side, with omnipresence, we shrink into the minute- " ness of our own nature, and are, in a manner, annihilated " before Him. And though a consideration of His other " attributes may relieve in some measure our apprehensions; " yet no conviction of the justice, with which it is exer- " cised, nor the mercy, with which it is tempered, can wholly " remove the terror that naturally arises from a force, which " nothing can withstand. If we rejoice, we rejoice with " trembling ; and even whilst we are receiving benefits, we " cannot but shudder at a power, which can confer benefits " of such mighty importance." Edmund Burke on the Sublime and Beautiful, Part II. Sect. 5. Note GG, p. 102. Aid tovto iv irapafioXais avrols XaX&, on fiXeirovres ov /3Xeirpvai Kal aKOVovres ovk aKOvovaiv ovbe avviovai. Kal dva- irX-qpovrai eir avrols r) irpo(pr]Teia 'Hcraton r) Xiyovcra. AKorj aKOvaere ical ov pr) avvfjre' Kal (SXeirovres j3X4\j/ere ko.1 ov pr) tSrjre. inaxvvOr] ydp i) Kapbia tov Xaov tovtov Kal rots cocrt /3ape'cos rjKOvaav ko.1 tovs oqbddXpovs avr&v iKappvaav prynore Kieocri rots ocbdaXpois Kat rots cocrii" aKOvcrcocrt Kat rrj Kapbia crvv&cn ko.1 eiriOTpeyjraio-i Kal tdcrcopat avrovs. St. Matt. xiii. 13—15. The passage quoted stands thus in the Septuagint : 'Akojj aKowere Kat ov pr) o-vvryre Kal (BXeirovres /3Ae\/>ere Kat ov pi] t&rjre. Eiraxvvdr] yap tj Kapbia rov Xaov toutov ko.1 rots coow avr&v /3ape'cos r/Kovcrav Kal rovs 6cb8dXpovs iKappvaav, prfirore tScocrt rots 68pas eireaBai OeXeiv avriS ets rds ipnpias dXXd Kat ywatKas, ovx virorepvopevas rr)v yvvaiKeiav aadeveiav Kal to boKOvv iv rco aKoXovOeiv ets rds iprjplas rco 8tSao-KdAcp- diradearara be iraibia, tjtoi rots yewrjcracnz; eiropeva r) rdxa Kal viro rrjs Oeiorqros avrov dyopeva, 'iva avrols ivairapf] oVto'rrjs, rjKoXovOei perd t&v yeyevvrjKorav. C. Cels. III. 10. The Benedictine Editor suggests viropepvr)pevas instead of virorepvopevas in this passage and accordingly translates fcemineas imbecillitatis oblitce. May not the other reading however be well understood to mean : not divesting them selves of— although they did not lose the feeling of woman's weakness nor cast aside the natural regard for character ? Note LL, p. 114. Partitio Doctrinae humana? ea est verissima, qua? sumitur ex triplici facultate animae rationalis, qua? doctrinae sedes est. Historia ad memoriam refertur ; Poesis ad Phantasiam; Philosophia ad Rationem. Per Poesim autem hoc loco in- telligimus non aliud quam historiam confictam s\ve fabu- las. ...Neque alia censemus ad Theologica partitione opus esse. Differunt certe informationes oraculi et sensus et re et modo insinuandi : sed spiritus humanus unus est, ejus- que arcula? et ceila? eaedem. Fit itaque ac si diversi liquores atque per diversa infundibula in unum atque idem vas reci- piantur. Quare et Theologia aut ex Historia Sacra con stat ; aut ex Parabolis, qua? instar Divina? Poeseos sunt ; aut ex praeceptis et dogmatibus, tanquam perenni quadam Philosophia. Quod enim ad earn partem pertinet, quae re- dundare videtur, Prophetiam videlicet, ea Historia? genus est ; quandoquidem Historia Divina ea polleat supra hu- manam praerogativa ut narratio factum praecedere non mi nus quam sequi possit. Baconi de Augmentis Scienti- arum II. cap. 1. Having afterwards divided Poetry into Narrativa, Dra- matica and Parabolica, the great Author thus defines each : Narrativa (Poesis) prorsus historiam imitatur, ut fere fallat, nisi quod res extollat saepius supra fidem. Drama- tica est veluti historia spectabilis ; nam constituit imaginem ILLUSTRATIONS. 267 rerum tanquam praesentium, historia autem tanquam pra?- tentarum. Parabolica vero est historia cum typo, qua? in- tellectualia deducit ad sensum. Poesis Parabolica inter reliquas eminet et tanquam res sacra videtur et augusta : cum praesertim Religio ipsa ejus opera plerumque utatur et per earn commercia Divinorum cum humanis exerceat. Attamen et hcec quoque, ingeni- orum circa allegorias levitate et indulgentia, contaminata invenitur. Est autem usus ambigui atque ad contraria adhibetur. Facit enim ad Involucrum; facit etiam ad illustrationem. In hoc Docendi quaedam ratio ; in illo occultandi arti- ficium, quaeri videtur. — Haec autem docendi ratio, qua? facit ad illustrationem, antiquis seculis plurimum adhibeba- tur Ut Hieroglyphica literis, ita Parabola? argumentis erant antiquiores. Atque hodie etiam et semper, eximius est et fuit Parabolarum vigor ; cum nee argumenta tam perspicua nee vera exempla tam apta, esse possint. Alter est usus Poeseos Parabolica priori quasi contrarius, qui fa cit, ut diximus, ad involucrum; earum nempe rerum, qua- rum dignitas tanquam velo quodam discreta esse mereatur : hoc est, cum occulta et mysteria Religionis, Politica?, et Philosophiae, fabulis et Parabolis vestiuntur. Ibid. cap. 13. Note MM, p. 120. The Bampton Lectures for the year 1824, being an at tempt to trace the History and to ascertain the limits of the Secondary and Spiritual Interpretation of Scripture, by the late Mr. Conybeare, furnish an interesting and useful view of this subject. Against the errors, which Mr. Conybeare states and exposes, as well as against errors of interpreta tion in general, the student will find the best assistance, which extensive learning and mature wisdom can supply in the Bampton Lectures for the year 1814, entitled " An " Inquiry into the General Principles of Scripture-Inter- " pretation," by the late Dr. Van Mildert, Bishop of Dur ham. The following extract from one of the admirable Sermons erf that Volume contains a brief summary of the 268 NOTES AND principles, which it is the design of this and the preceding Lecture to unfold and apply : " Parables form a very important part of the Sacred Writings. Our Lord not only took frequent occasion to introduce them, but by His own exposition of some, taught us how to expound others There is in every Parable a two-fold sense, the literal and the mystical, coinciding in signification The literal is the external sense ; the mystical, the internal. The literal must there fore be first explained ; that the correspondence between it and the mystical may be more readily perceived. This correspondence however does not necessarily extend be yond the general purport of the similitude and its lead ing circumstances: nor is it always expedient to aim at tracing the parallel in every minute particular Gene rally indeed the more exactly the mystical exposition can be made to accord with the literal, the more perfect the Parable will appear to be; and therefore, though we ought carefully to distinguish between essential and merely circumstantial resemblances, yet where the latter admit of an easy and natural application, they are by no means to be overlooked : and it is observable that in those Parables, which our Lord himself interpreted to His disciples, few, if any, of the circumstantial points are unapplied. But here great judgment is often necessary, neither to do too little nor to attempt too much. Atten- tion is principally requisite to the immediate design of the Parable ; which for the most part, is declared either at its beginning or its conclusion, or sufficiently appears from the occasion, on which it was delivered. Some Parables indeed are evidently prophetical, and are to be explained by the same rules to which Prophecies in gene ral are subject. Others serve to illustrate important points of doctrine. Others have the force of moral pre cepts. A competent knowledge, therefore, of this branch of mystical instruction is of very extensive importance." Serm. VII. p. 195—197. The warning voice of Dr. Routh is often and loudly ILLUSTRATIONS. 269 raised against the excesses of mystical or spiritual interpre tation : Apage vero (he exclaims on one occasion) hasce alWo- ristarum nugas, quibus, propter nonnulla vere typica in Sacra Scriptura et alia quaedam vel tropice prolata vel am- bigua? interpretationis, magni alioqui viri, dum alios captare volebant, suam ipsorum famam laeserunt. Rei. Sacr. Vol. III. p. 215. Note NN, p. 128. Quod ad Mysteriorum explicationem attinet, videmus non dedignari Deum ad infirmitatem captus nostri se demittere ; mysteria sua ita explicando ut a nobis optime ea possint percipi ; atque revelationes suas in rationis nostra? syllepses et notiones veluti inoculando ; atque inspirationes ad intel lectum nostrum sic accommodando, quemadmodum fioura clavis aptatur figura? sera?. Qua tamen in parte nobis ipsis deesse minime debemus. Cum enim Deus ipse opera rationis nostra? in illuminationibus suis utatur, etiam nos eandem in omnes partes versare debemus, quo magis capaces simus ad Mysteria recipienda et imbibenda. Modo animus ad ampli- tudinem mysteriorum, pro modulo suo, dilatetur, non mys teria ad angustias animi constringantur. Bacon, de Aug. Scient. IX. Note OO, p. 135. This expression is borrowed from the following passage of Dr. Townson' s Sermon on the Manner of our Saviour's teaching : " We may observe that, when the case did not demand se- " verity, there is a great lenity of supposition in the state of " His Parables. The wise virgins are as many as the foolish. " In the Parable of the ten talents, we find two good and " faithful and only one unprofitable servant. At the marriage " feast, only one of a large assembly is represented as wanting " a wedding garment :" p. 284 of Vol. I. of Dr. Townson's Works. The whole of that beautiful Sermon is earnestly recommended to the attention of the reader : if by its means he should be induced to make himself acquainted with the other writings of the same excellent Author, he will have reason to be thankful for this reference. 270 NOTES AND Note PP, p. 141. The acute and able Tertullian, vir ille majori quidem in- genio praeditus atque eruditione quam judicio {Rei. Sacr. Vol. III. 363.) has on this subject displayed more than his usual discretion. He discerned the inconvenience of carry ing a mystical or spiritual interpretation of Holy Scripture and even of the Parables of the Gospel, too far ; and he has expressed himself, in his Treatises de Resurrectione Carnis and de Pudicitia, on the subject of the cautions and restric tions necessary to be observed, in a manner, which is indeed far from being consistent with his own practice but may be regarded as the result of his deliberate reflection. In the former of these two Treatises, he is arguing against those, who contended that every thing stated concerning the resur rection of the body is to be understood figuratively and who went so far as to insist that all the instructions of our Sa viour were figurative. He proceeds : Ad Evangelia provoco, hic quoque occursurus prius eidem astutia? eorum, qui proinde et Dominum omnia in Parabolis pronuntiasse contendunt, quia scriptum est: Haec omnia locutus est Jesus in Parabolis et sine Parabola non loque- batur ad illos, scilicet ad Judaeos. Nam et discipuli, Quare, aiunt, in Parabolis loqueris ? Et Dominus : Propterea in Parabolis loquor ad eos ut videntes non videant et audientes non audiant, secundum Esaiam. Quod si ad Judaeos in Parabolis, jam, non semper nee omnia parabolae ; sed qua?- dam, cum ad quosdam : ad quosdam autem, dum ad Ju daeos : nonnunquam plane et ad discipulos. Sed quo- modo referat Scriptura, considera : Dicebat autem et Parabolam ad eos : ergo et non Parabolam dicebat, quia non notaretur quum Parabolam loquebatur, si ita sem per loquebatur. Et tamen nullam Parabolam aut non ab ipso invenias edissertatam ; ut de seminatore in verbi administratione ; aut a commentatore Evangelii praelumi- natam, ut judicis superbi et vidua? instantis ad perseveran- tiam orationis ; aut ultra conjectandam, ut arboris fici, di- latae in spem, ad instar Judaica? infructuositatis. Quod si nee Parabola? obumbrant Evangelii lucem, tanto abest ut ILLUSTRATIONS. 271 sententia? et definitiones, quarum aperta natura est, aliter quam sonant sapiant. De Resur. Carnis, XXXIII. The object of the Treatise de Pudic. is to exclude from the hope of pardon all such Christians as might be guilty of the grievous sins, against which it is more immediately di rected. In maintaining this severe tenet of Montanism, Tertullian is led both to enter into an examination of the details of some Parables and to lay down certain general principles of interpretation. A more convenient opportu nity of noticing the former will occur hereafter : for the pre sent, the latter only shall be selected : Plerosque interpretes Parabolarum idem exitus decipit, quem in vestibus purpura oculandis saepissime evenire est. Quum putaveris recte conciliasse temperamenta colorum et credideris comparationes eorum inter se animasse, erudito mox utroque corpore et luminibus expressis, errorem omnem traducta diversitas evomet Quamquam etsi, omnia ad speculum respondere possint, unum sit praecipuum pericu- lum interpretationum, ne aliorsum temperetur felicitas com- parationum quam quo Parabola? cuj usque materia man- davit A primordio secundum occasiones Parabolarum (haeretici) ipsas materias confinxerunt doctrinarum. Vacavit scilicet illis solutis a regula veritatis ea conquirere atque componere, quorum Parabola? videntur. Nos autem, qui non ex Parabolis materias commentamur sed ex materiis Parabolas interpretamur, nee valde laboramus omnia in ex- positione torquere, dum contraria quaeque caveamus Malumus in Scripturis minus si forte sapere quam contra. Proinde sensum Domini custodire debemus atque pra?- ceptum. Non est levior transgressio in inter pretatione quam in conversatione. De Pudic. VIII. IX. Note QQ, p. 145. Both Hammond and Whitby disapprove of this way of understanding avr&v. The former suggests that the pro noun may be governed by Kara understood, and so may come after the verb eyoyyvfrv ; or that it may refer to the inhabitants of the place or to the Jews ; and so mean the Pharisees of that place — those ofthe Jews, who were Phari- 272 NOTES AND sees. Dr. Whitby adopts the latter interpretation. The point, which is of no importance, may be left to the judg ment of the reader. Note RR, p. 147- In the parallel places of St. Matthew and St. Mark, the words ets perdvoiav are omitted from the text by Griesbach; but they are retained by him in this passage of St. Luke,. as not admitting of any objection or doubt. Note SS, p. 148. The remarks of Gregory the Great on this passage of the Gospel History are most just and beautiful: Pharisa?i...dijudicantes Dominum quod peccatores susci- peret, arenti corde ipsum fontem misericordia? reprehende- bant. Sed quia aegri erant ita ut segros se esse nescirent, quatenus quod erant agnoscerent, ccelestis eos Medicus blandis fomentis curat, benignum paradeigma objicit et in eorum corde vulneris tumorem premit. Sti Greg. P. in locum Evangel. Note TT,p.l49. Celsus had objected to the Christians that it was their doctrine rots apapraXois ireirep(p6ai tov ®eov ; and on this objection he founded the questions: rt rots dvapaprrjrois ovk iirep(pdri ; ri KaKov iari rd pr) r)paprr]Kevai ; Origen replies : Trpds rovro be (f>apev on, et pev dvapapT-qTovs Aeyet rovs p-rj- Kert apapravovras, iirepipdr) Kai rovrois 6 Scorrjp f/p&v '\naovs, dAA' ovk larpos' el be dvapaprr\rois rots ptrjSe ir&irore fjpaprr)- Koaiv, ov ydp bieareiXaro ev rfj eavrov Ae£ei, ipovpev on dbv- varov elvai ourcos avOparirov dvapdprrjrov rovro be (papev, vire^aipovpevov rov Kara rov 'Irjcroiiy voovpevov dvOpdtirov, bs apaprlav ovk eiroirjae. Contra Cels. III. 62. Note UU, p. 150. " Still, again it must be urged, there are no actual pre- " cepts or doctrines of Revealed Religion, which may not, " when regarded under their necessary modifications, afford " universal as well as particular instruction ; nor may we ven- " ture to affirm, of any single portion of Holy Writ that to " believers in any age or country it is of no concern. But ILLUSTRATIONS. 273 " there are doubtless many portions, of which the proper ap- " plication to other persons and to other times, must depend " on a right understanding of their intended application to " those persons and times for which they were immediately " written. It is thus that directions the most special and per- " sonal may afford general information to the rest of mankind. " They teach them how to act when similarly circumstanced. " They serve either as specifications of general rules or as " limitations of those which are elsewhere more indefinitely " expressed, or as enlargements of such as appear to be of a " more limited and restricted nature. In all cases, they sug- " gest what, ceteris paribus or mutatis mutandis, \s the pro- " per test of obedience to the Divine will. And thus the " Christian becomes more thoroughly acquainted with his " duty in special cases and under particular trials, as well as " with its general principles. Where these however are con- " founded together or substituted the one for the other, in- " consistency and error will be the natural result." Bishop Van Milderfs Bampton Lect. p. 141, 142. NoteVV, p. 151. *H copa Aeyetz; Kat rdi> larpbv bp&vra beivd Kal Oiyydvovra dr)b&v Iva roils Kapvovras tdcrrjrat, ef dyadov els kokov rj eK KaAov ets alaxpbv, rj ef eibaip.ovias ets KaKobaipoviav epxeadai ; Kairoiye 6 Iarpbs bp&v rd beivd ko\ Oiyydvaiv r&v ar]b&v, ov irdvrm eK(pevyei to rots arjrots bvvaaOai irepiireaeiv bbe rpav- para t&v \\rvx&v r)p&v Oepairevav bid rod iv avr& Xoyov deov, avrbs irdans KaKias airapdSeKTOs rjv el be Kal a&pa Qvryrbv Kal ¦tyvxv\v dvdpa>irivr)v avaXafi&v 6 dddvaros debs Xoyos boKei rco KeAcrco dXXdrreaOai Kal perairXdrreadai- pavdaverot on 6 Xoyos rfj ovala pevv irdaxei rd o-<3p;a rj rj \jrvxn' avyKaraflaivbiv 8' ea(f ore tco pr) bvvap.evu> avrov rds pappapvyas Kal rr)v Xapirporrjra rrjs detdrrjros i3Xeneiv, oiovei aap£ yiverai, a(opariK&s XaXovpevos, eW 6 toiovtov avrov ira- pdbegdpevos, «ara j3pax^ viro tov Xoyov pereoipi^evos bvvrjdfi avTov Kal ttjv {lv ovtojs 6vopdaa>) irpor]yovp,evr]v poptprjv 8ea- aaadai. Orig. c. Cels. IV. 15. Note WW, p. 157. There seems to be now so general an agreement among T 274 NOTES AND Commentators, at all events among Protestant Commen tators, as to the distinction of this passage of the Gospel History from the narratives contained in St. Matt. xxvi. 6—13, St. Mark xiv. 3—9, and St. John xii. 3—8, that it is not necessary to do more than allude to the opinion, which has connected the name of Mary Magdalen with this transaction ; and to observe that the notice contained in the summary of contents of the 7th -chapter of St. Luke, in our English New Testament, depends on no higher authority than such opinion, at the time of our Version generally pre vailing. See on this subject the remarks of Dr. Lardner, p. 253—264 of Vol. XI. of his Works, 8vo. The clearing up of one single instance of this sort is by no means unim portant towards a more favourable and, assuredly, a juster view of the character of our Lord's chosen companions than many Commentators have been fond of taking. It must be allowed that they have been able to quote in their favour, an early authority, which describes the Apostles themselves, before our Saviour's choice of them, as ovras virep iraaav apaprlav dvopotTepovs. Sti Barn. Ep. in init. The excellent remarks of Cotelerius on this passage are well deserving of notice. Note XX, p. 160. ISoti rd fjpiar] r&v virapxovratv pov, Kvpie, bibaipi rots Trrco- Xots" Kat et nvos n iavKOipavrr/aa, dirobib(t>pi rerpairXovv. These words are usually understood to be expressive of a purpose for the future ; but it will be allowed that they are well suited to denote a previous habit. Note YY, p. 164. It was from this and from similar passages of the Gospels that the cavil of Celsus took its rise : Tts ovv avrr] irore i) r&v dpaprwX&v irportp-qais ; The answer of the Christian Apologist is worthy of his cause : Ka0d7ra£ pev dpaprcoAos ov irponparai tov pr) dpaprcoAorr eari 8' ore dpaprcoAos crwatcr6,dp,ez.'os rrjs Ibias dpaprias Kal bid rovro irpbs ro peravoeiv iropevopevos, iirl rots r)paprrjpevois ra- ireivos, irponparai rov eXarrov pev vopi^opevov elvai dpaprcoAov, owk olopevov 8' avrov dpapr(i>Xbv dXX' eisaipopevov eiri naiv, ILLUSTRATIONS. 275 ots OoKet o-wetSe^ai earjrcp Kpeirroai ko.1 ire(pvauopevov err' av- T0ls Orj /3Xaa(j>ripovpev ovv rdy ®ebv ovbe Kara^evbopeda, bibdo-Kovres irdvO' ovnvovv avvaiadeadai rrjs dvdpu>irivi]s /3pavrj- rrjros, cos rrpds rr> rov ®eov p.eyaAetdrrjra- Kat det atVett; air' eKeivov ro ivbeov rrj cprjcret i)p&v, rov povov avairXr)povv ra iX- Xiirfj r)piv bvvapevov, Orig. c. Cels. III. 64. Note ZZ,p.l70. On a question of application or improvement of this sort, a higher authority than that of Dr. Townson can scarcely be adduced ; and he has declared himself in favour of the view here noticed, both in the Sermon, to which reference was lately made and in p. 13 of his Discourses on the Gospels. It is worth while to consider how much of the machinery of the Parable, even according to that interpretation which ex plains it of Jews and Gentiles or of the genuine sons of Abraham and Publicans and sinners, still remains inappli cable. The sternness, anger and jealousy of the elder son may appear, under this view, natural and probable; but the interpreters have been little careful to explain, or, if they have hazarded the attempt, have ill succeeded in explaining how an equally happy accordance can be made out between the expression of the Father's feeling towards his first-born son and the Divine disapprobation of the self-conceited and proud Scribes and Pharisees. Tertullian's observations on the three Parables of this Chapter of St. Luke's Gospel, in the same Treatise from which his general principles for in terpreting Parables have been already taken, well deserve attention. His object was to deprive his adversaries of that support, which they drew from the particular Parables now under consideration. Accordingly, he insisted that the Parables, rightly understood, are reconcilable with that limitation of the Divine mercy, which he advocated. His mistake was grievous; and it is only rendered more melan choly by the fact that he discovered and has recorded prin ciples, which lead directly towards the refutation of his own error and which tend to shew this portion of our Lord's teaching in the pure and unsullied light of its original com- munication. t 2 276 NOTES AND Quare centum oves? et quid utique decern drachmae? et qua? ilia? scopa? ?...Necesse erat qui unius peccatoris salutem gratissimam Deo volebat exprimere, aliquam numeri quan- titatem nominaret, de quo unum quidem perisse describeret. Necesse erat ut habitus requirentis draehmam in domo tam scoparum quam lucerna? adminiculo adcommodaretur. Hu- jusmodi enim curiositates et suspecta faciunt quaedam et coactarum expositionum subtilitate plerumque deducunt a veritate. Sunt autem qua? et simpliciter posita sunt ad struendam et disponendam et texendam Parabolam ut illuc perducantur cui exemplum procuratur. Et duo utique filii illuc spectabunt quo et drachma et ovis. Quibus enim co- haerent, eandem habent causam, eandemque utique mussi- tationem Pharisaeorum. — De Pud. VIII. IX. Note AAA, p. 182. In the Vulgate, the passage of St. Matthew's Gospel stands thus: Magister bone, quid boni faciam ut habeam vitam aeternam ? Qui dixit ei : Quid me interrogas de bono ? Unus est bonus Deus. It is evident that this translation follows a reading, ap proved by many eminent critics and adopted into the text by Griesbach, on the authority of the MSS. in which it is found : Tt pe epcords 7rept roiJ dyadov ; els ecrrii' 6 ayaOos. As however, in the parallel places of St. Mark and St. Luke, there is no such variety of reading, it would seem fair to interpret St. Matthew's language in a sense consist ent with the plainer expressions of the two other Evan gelists. Note BBB, p. 182. Kat ov KaKor]6eis dXX' evi]Qeis (elalv ot veoi) Std rd ptrjTrco re- OewpriKevai iroXXds irovnptas' Kal eviriaroi, bid rd p.rj iroXXd ignirarfjadai' Kal eveXiribes' Kal peyaXo\jruxoi' ovre ydp viro tov p~iov orj7rco reraTreu'coi'rai dAAd rcoi> dvayKalav direipoi elai' Kal to dgiovv avrov peydXav peyaXoxbvxia' rovro 8' eveXiribos' Arist. Rhet. II. 12. Note CCC, p. 185. Bishop Bull, in defending Origen from the censure, ILLUSTRATIONS. 277 which Huet has cast upon his remarks on this passage (vid. Ong. c. Cels. V. 11, and Huetii Origenian. II. 2. 15.) well observes : Quis credat Origenem stupidi adeo ingenii fuisse ut non intellexerit textum ilium Evangelista? (Marc. scil. X. 18.) ad Christi oiKovoplav, in assumpta natura humana suscep- tam, omnino pertinere ? imo Origenes ibidem diserte monet se Christum ista loquentem inducere, tanquam irapdbeiypa, exemplum, quod scil. hominibus ipse Christus, inter ho mines versatus, exhibere voluit Cum clare doceat Origenes Filium esse, perinde ac Patrem, verum Deum, in- creatum, immortalem, immutabilem, impassibilem, immen- sum, ubique praesentem, atque undequaque beatum et per- fectum ; qua is ratione potuit in eodem libro bonitatem, quae Patri convenit, Filio, qua Deus est,detrahere? Def en. Fid. Nic. II. ix. 13 Note DDD, p. 200. The candour of the writers of the New Testament has been well illustrated and urged by Dr. Paley, in the third Ch. of Pt. II. of his Evidences. It is interesting to observe how an ancient Apologist briefly, yet emphatically, touches on this point : 2z/ptj3e/3rjKei' coo-re row p-rj iriarevovras {t&v 'lovbatav) roA- prjaai Kara rov 'Irjcrov TOiavra, dnva cptAaArjt9cos Kai evyva>po- vcos aveypa\jfav ol paOrjral avrov, ovx vireKKXetyavres rrjs irepl avrov irapabo^ov laropias rd boKOvv rots iroAAots aiaxvvrjv rep Adycp Xpianav&v (j>epeiv. Orig. c. Cels. III. 28. Note EEE, p. 200. Dr. Townson, having compared the parallel places — viz. St. Matt. iv. 17-22, St. Mark i. 14-20 and St. Luke v. 1-11. concludes that " the two accounts, that of St. Mat- " thew and St. Mark on one side and that of St. Luke on " the other, thus concurring in the place and situation " in which St. Peter was called, in the promise made to " him and the time, when he was called, speak evidently of " the same vocation." He confirms his opinion by the authority of several distinguished Authors, to whom he re- 278 NOTES AND fers. Mr. Greswell has arrived at a different conclusion, which he states and maintains in the IXth Dissertation ofthe second Vol. of his Work on the Harmony of the Gospels. It is to be regretted, that, after having pointed out a series of inconsistencies between the narratives of St. Matthew and St. Mark on the one hand and that of St. Luke on the other, which appear to his own mind irreconcilable with the notion that the three Evangelists are referring to one and the same event, he should have indulged in a severity of vituperation of all who may differ from himself, which the occasion neither calls for nor can justify. See p. 347 and 348 of Vol. II. of his Work. Note FFF, p. 206. There is a touching simplicity in the Remarks made on this passage of the Gospel History by Archelaus, Bp. of Mesopotamia, in his Dispute with Manes, as that Dispute is recorded in the letter of Archelaus to Diodorus, and given in the Rei. Sacr. Vol. IV. p. 234-277. Manes had urged our Lord's words: " Who is my mother and who " are my brethren ?" to disprove His natural relation to Mary. Archelaus answers by contrasting His severe re proof of Peter, even after the blessing pronounced on him for his confession, with the milder censure on this occasion applied to the messenger : Et lit te magis ac magis edoceam, multo amplius ilium, qui de matre nuntiaverat, honoratum : tu autem oblitus rei, qua? nobis proposita est, in aliud conversus es : audi ergo breviter; si enim volueris diligentius intueri qua? dicta sunt, inveniemus in illo priore multam Dominum Jesum ostendisse clementiam, idque convenientibus te exemplis edoceam. Rex quidam, cum adversus hostem processisset armatus, et cogitaret atque disponeret quemadmodum posset manum sibi hostilem atque barbaram subjugare, cumque in multa esset cura, et solicitudine constitutus, in medio ad- versariorum positus, ac postea jam captivos eos tenere inci- piens, jam jam ilia solicitudo immineret, quemadmodum eos, qui secum laboraverant ac pondus belli toleraverant, procu- raret, quidam ei nuntius importunus occurrens, de rebus ILLUSTRATIONS. 279 domesticis suggerere aliqua ccepit. At ille admiratus est audaciam, atque importunam suggestionem, et morti tra- dere hujuscemodi hominem cogitabat ; quod nisi de caris- simis affectibus talis nuntius extitisset, eo quod incolumes esse hos, et recte ac prospere agentes omnia nuntiasset, dig- num protinus potuit excepisse supplicium. Qua? enim erat cura alia Regis, belli duntaxat tempore, nisi Provincialium salus, nisi dispositio rei militaris ? Ita et Domino meo Jesu Christo pugnanti adversum passiones, qua? profunda visce- rum obsederant, et curans eos qui multo tempore variis in- firmitatibus fuerant devincti, et inclinato omni nisu pro salute universitatis ; ille nuntius importune adveniens de matre et fratribus nuntiavit. Et potuit quidem similem Petro, aut etiam graviorem accepisse sententiam ; sed matris et fratrum intellectum nomen clementiam provocavit. Note GGG, p. 208. Egregie observatum est quod Responsa Salvatoris nostri, ad quaestiones non paucas ex iis, qua? proponebantur, non videntur ad rem sed quasi impertinentia. Cujus rei causa duplex est ; altera, quod cum cogitationes eorum, qui inter- rogabant, non ex verbis, ut nos homines solemus, sed imme diate et ex sese cognovisset, ad cogitationes eorum non ad verba respondit ; altera, quod non ad eos solum locutus est, qui tunc aderant, sed ad nos etiam, qui vivimus et ad omnis a?vi ac loci homines, quibus Evangelium fuerit prae- dicandum. Quod etiam in aliis scriptura? locis obtinet. Bacon, de Augm. Sclent. IX. No stress has been here laid upon the strong language, which St. Mark employs, to denote the feeling excited by our Lord's appearance : Kat evdem irds 6 d'vAos ibiav avrov efe6"aptj3rj0Tj Kat irpoarpexovres r)aird(ovTo avrov. (St. Mark ix. 15.) It is indeed possible that these words may denote no more than surprise, occasioned by His unexpected ap pearance ; yet has it been felt and acknowledged that they may serve to imply " some traces of the glory of His trans- " figuration still remaining on His countenance." Is not this rather to be considered as one of several instances, which may be observed in the Gospel History, wherein the impres- 280 NOTES AND sion, produced by our Lord's presence and personal in fluence, is to be accounted for on the following prin ciple ? 'H deiorepa rov 'Irjaov bvvapis oiov re ovros, ore if3ovXero, koi dvpbv ix@p&v dvairropevov ajieaai ko.1 pvpidbav deiq xaPlTl irepiyeveadai Kal Xoyiapovs 0opvp~ovvra>v biaaKebdaai. (Origen. in Joan. Tom. X. 16.) See also St. Luke iv. 30. Note HHH, p. 215. Anastasius Sinaita (who died Patriarch of Antioch at the close of the 6th Century) thus mentions Papias : AafiovTes rds d(j)oppds c?k Ylairiov rov irdvv tov 'lepairoXirov, rov ev rco iiriarwdito dpoirrjaavros. Dr. Routh remarks : Caeterum Joannes Apostolus d emcrrrjo'ios Xpiarov a Ce- dreno quoque nominatur in Historiar. Compend. p. 203. Ed. Xylandri ; et diu ante hunc chronographum Anasta- siumque tertio etiam vertente saeculo ab Anatolio Laodiceno sic dictus est in Canone Paschali, cujus vetus interpres La- tinus haec habet ; Joanne scilicet Evangelista et pectoris Domini incubatore. §. X. Ed. Bucherian. Imo et secundo Ecclesiae saeculo Polycrates Ephesinus Episcopus similiter signavit Apostolum, hi be ko.1 'la>dvvr]s 6 iirl rb arrjOos rorj Kvpiov avaireaonv. Reliq. Sacr. Vol. I. p. 15 et 37. Origen employs the same description in the opening of his Commentaries on St. John's Gospel : the whole passage is, for other reasons, worthy of being quoted : having briefly characterised each of the three preceding Evangelists, Origen proceeds : AAAd ye rrjpet {AovKas scil. of whom the previous sen tence speaks) rco iirl to arrjdos dvaireaovn rov 'Irjaov rovs pei- Covas Kal reXeiorepovs irepl 'Irjaov Xoyovs' ovbels ydp eKeiviav aKpar&s i(pavep(oaev avrov rr)v deorrjra cos 'Icodw/js irapaarrjaas avrov Xeyovra' eyco etptt ro epcos roS Koapov iyd elpi r) d8ds Kat i) dXr/deia ko.1 tj £cotj' eyco elpi r) dvdaraais' eyd elpi r) 6vpa' eyco elpi 6 iroiprjv 6 KaXos' Kal 'iv rfj diroKaXvxjrei, eyco elpi to a koi to to, rj apxh Kal rb re'Aos, d 7rpcoros Kat d eVxaros. ToA- prjreov roivvv elireiv dirapxr)v pev iraa&v ypa(p&v elvai rd ev- ayyeAia, r&v be eiayyeXluv dirapxrjv rd Kara 'lo)dvvrjv. Com. in Joan. 6. Tom. I. ILLUSTRATIONS. 281 Thus too, at a later period, speaks S. Andreas Cretensis, in the beginning of that Sermon on Lazarus, which has been already quoted in these Notes : riaptreo roivvv ets peaov f/p&v 6 6eoirriK(&Taros 'Icodvwjs- d rcoz> diroKpv(j>b)v avTOTrnjs' koi r&v appr/rav iKprjyrjTrjs' 6 iirl tov arrjdovs dvairea&v rrjs irdi'rcoz' fcofjs" ds Kar' avrr)v rov beairoriKov irddovs yevopevos rr)v dpxr)i>, povos r&v aXXaiv tStcos avyypd(pei rb Kara rdr> Ad&pov Oavpa. Op. p. 57. Note III, p. 216. Beatus Joannes Evangelista, cum Ephesi moraretur usque ad ultimam senectutem ut vix inter discipulorum manus ad Ecclesiam deferretur nee posset in plura vocem verba con- texere, nihil aliud per singulas solebat proferre collectas nisi hoc : Filioli, diligite alterutrum. Tandem discipuli et fratres, qui aderant, taedio affecti quod eadem semper audi- rent, dixerunt : Magister, quare semper hoc loqueris ? Qui respondit dignam Joanne sententiam : Quia praeceptum Domini est ; et si solum fiat, sufficit. E Sti Hieronym. Com. in Ep. ad Gal. vi. 10. Note KKK, p. 225. 'Hp-ets reOrjirapev tov 'Inaovv, rov vovv f/p&v peraOevra dirb iravros aiadrjrov, cos ov povov (pdaprov dXXd Kal (pQaprjaopivov Kal dvdyovra iirl rr)v perd dpOov /3tov 7rpds tov iirl iraai ®ebv npr)v per evx&v, ds irpoadyopev air&, cos 8td pera^ii ovros rrjs tov dyevrtrov Kal rrjs r&v yevrvr&v irdvra>v (pvaeass Kal epe'poz>ros pev r)piv rds dirb roC Ilarpos evepyeaias, biaKopi(ovros b' r)p&v, rpoirov dpxtepe'eos, rds erjxds 7rpds tov iirl iraai deov. Orig. c. Cels. III. 34. Note LLL, p. 227. On the interpretation of these words, as belonging to our Saviour alone, see Bishop Middleton on the Greek Ar ticle, p. 544 Edit. 1828. And with regard to the anti quity of such interpretation, the remarks and quotations of Dr Routh (Rei. Sacr. Vol. II. p. 26) are decisive. The preceding Notes have served to shew how much the Author 282 NOTES AND ILLUSTRATIONS. of these Lectures owes to the latter revered Scholar and Theologian, towards whom his sense of public obligation is accompanied and increased, by the most respectful senti ments of personal and private regard. YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 3 9002 08844 2927