! "I give <*^i jS«ft*i* hfo* tie founding of a. Colltgt in. tAifMefoxy! Gift of Mx^ciy^ y190~b' Q^M^G^atk £A^^ THE NEW AND LIVING WAY AN ORDERLY ARRANGEMENT AND EXPOSITION DOCTRINES OF CHRISTIAN EXPERIENCE ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES BY MILTON S. TERRY, D.D., LL.D. Professor of Christian Doctrine in Garrett Biblical Institute 'Oddf Trpoocparog nai ^uaa NEW YORK: EATON & MAINS CINCINNATI: JENNINGS & PYE Copyright by EATON & MAINS, 1902. TO MY WIFE WHO IN THE CHARM OF A PURE AND NOBLE LIFE HAS FOR FORTY YEARS EXEMPLIFIED THE BEAUTY OF THE NEW AND LIVING WAY PREFACE. This treatise aims to supply a desideratum in our religious literature, and yet it covers a series of topics on some of which more books and discussions have been written than on almost any other set of related themes. Our desire is to furnish a brief but compre hensive statement of the main facts of Christian ex perience, to formulate them in true logical order, and to expound them after the method of a strictly biblical theology. At the same time each doctrine is treated with due regard to its proportionate claims to the attention of the Christian believer. In order to appre ciate fully these expositions of vital doctrine and to profit by the study, the reader ought to have his Bible (Revised Version) constantly at hand, and to note the position and relations of the chief proof-texts em ployed. Only as we observe how a biblical statement is set in its context, and how much it may be affected by the personality of the writer who put it on record, are we always able to judge of its real value as a proof-text of fundamental doctrine. Strictly speak ing, our present work is a piece of biblical dogmatics rather than a section of systematic theology. The above statement is in substance our apology for offering a new book on a group of doctrines al ready so extensively treated in the current literature of the Church. So far as I know, they have never been treated altogether in this conspicuously scrip tural way. We have almost any number of separate discussions of the doctrines of sin, justification, per sonal assurance, sanctifkation, and the sacraments; and so it has come to pass that some of these subjects have received a notably disproportionate share of at tention. We have scores of books on sanctifkation 5 6 Preface. or on holiness to one on some other aspects of Chris tian experience that stand in equal need of exposition. Bishop S. M. Merrill's little volume on Aspects of Christian Experience (Cincinnati, 1882) stands quite alone as an attempt to set forth all these related doc trines in their logical relations, and to give each topic its due proportion of attention. Bishop R. S. Foster's lectures on the Philosophy of Christian Ex perience (New York, 1891) cover much the same ground, but, as the title indicates, they assume the form of a philosophical discussion. All these sub jects are treated also more or less fully in the standard works on systematic theology. But on the doctrine of sanctifkation we possess an exceptionally large amount of literature, and much of it, strange to say, is of a decidedly polemic character. Among the books of special value, written by Methodist authors, we mention The Scripture Doctrine of Christian Perfec tion, by George Peck (New York, 1842) ; The Cen tral Idea of Christianity, by Jesse T. Peck (Boston, 1856) ; Christian Purity, by R. S. Foster (New York, 1869) ; Possibilities of Grace, by Asbury Lowrey (New York, 1884) ; Growth in Holiness Toward Perfection, by James Mudge (New York, 1895) ; Sin and Holi ness; or, What Is It to be Holy, by D. W. C. Hunting ton (Cincinnati, 1898). Back of all these, and holding a noteworthy authority among Methodists, is John Wesley's Plain Account of Christian Perfection, and also his various sermons on this subject and on other related doctrines. Among the many special treatises on justification we need name only the extensive dis cussions of Faber, Owen, and Ritschl. In all this literature, and in very much more of the same class, we fail to find a treatise in which these vitally related doctrines are presented in due propor- Preface. 7 tion and in logical order, and at the same time ex pounded after the methods of modern biblical theology. Some of the books above mentioned pay little or no atterition to the exegesis and bearing of the scriptural teachings, and nearly all of them devote a large amount of argument to the issues of old Calvinistic and Ar- minian controversies, which ought to be now consid ered obsolete. In some writers we find pages given up to the discussion of such a question as whether entire sanctifkation is a permanent repression or a total eradication of human depravity. Others employ half a volume in disputing whether Wesley taught this or that particular form of the doctrine. Such discussions have a certain historical interest and value and may please speculative theologians, but they may well be ignored when we set ourselves to the single task of ascertaining solely what the Scriptures teach. And we have, accordingly, endeavored to avoid even the use of words and phrases which savor of old controversies. We go to the original texts of the Bible, and try to bring forth from them precisely what they have to tell us of the blessed experiences and possibilities of the New and Living Way which Jesus, the great Priest over the house of God, has opened for us into the Holy of Holies (Heb. x, 19-21). We have aimed to depict this Way in its whole beautiful outline, not giving to justification, or to sanctifkation, or to the sacraments, or to any other one feature a disproportionate space, but assigning to every hallowed work of grace, its true scriptural place and portion. We have, furthermore, written with the hope and aim of supplying a manual adapted to a number of use ful purposes. This little volume may serve as a pro bationer's guide to a scriptural understanding of the most vital truths of our holy religion. It may furnish 8 Preface. topics as well as a course of reading and study for various meetings of the Epworth League. It may be helpful as a class leader's manual to enhance the neces sity of cultivating all the phases and possible experi ences of a well-rounded Christian life. At the same time it may to some extent come in as a substitute for the now almost defunct catechisms of the Church. The various topics discussed are those which can be tested by personal experience as well as by the Scriptures, but the more transcendent doctrines of one ever-living God and Father, the saving media tion of Jesus Christ, and the mission and ministry of the Holy Spirit are everywhere assumed as fundamental. We have tried to keep clear of all religious shibboleths, and while making reasonable use of common theological terms, we have studied to avoid unnecessary technical words and dogmatic forms of speech. It is sincerely hoped that the work may be found thoroughly scientific and critical in its exegetical method, and also equally adapted to meet the wants of the unlearned reader. Even youthful adults of ordinary intelligence are not to be supposed incapable of understanding language analogous to that of the Scriptures themselves, and they will not be at all disturbed by the occasional citation of Hebrew or Greek words where the subject under discussion war rants it, and where the learned readdr will be accommo dated by it. Even these citations, which are in nearly all instances put in parentheses or in footnotes, may have an incidental educational value for some readers who expect at some time to acquaint themselves with the original languages of the Bible. They will enhance the value of the book with many, and in no case need they detract in the least from its real worth to any class of readers. Contents. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. Preliminary Statements Touching Sin and Death. TAGE i. Primary Realities. 13 2. Necessary Limitations of Knowledge 14 3. Appeal to Facts 14 4. Human Sinfulness. 15 (1) Human Personality 15 (2) Capacity for Originating Evil 16 (3) Origin of Sin not Otherwise Accounted for. . 16 (4) Sense of Guilt and Shame Explained by Freedom of Volition. 17 5. Sin Conceived as Lawlessness 17 6. Pauline Doctrine of Sin 18 7. Guilt not Transmissible. 20 8. Degrees of Guilt 21 9. The Way of Life 22 CHAPTER II. Conviction of Sin, Repentance, and Conversion. 1. The Universal Consciousness of Sin 24 2. Conviction of Sin. 25 (1) Expressed in Penitential Psalms 25 (2) Described in Rom. vii 27 3. Repentance. 29 4. Conversion 30 10 Contents. CHAPTER III. The Doctrine of Faith. PAGE i. Doctrine of Paul 33 (i) Meaning of Eph. ii, 8 33 (2) Concept of Faith in the Epistle to Romans. . 34 2. Doctrine of Faith in the Epistle of James. ... 36 3. Concept of Faith in the Epistle to the Hebrews. . . 37 4. Doctrine of Faith in the Gospels. .... 38 5. Confession 40 CHAPTER IV. Forgiveness of Sins, Justification, and Reconcilia tion. 1. Greek Words for Remission. 42 2. Peculiarity of Paul's Doctrine of Justification. . . 43 3. The Idea of Reconciliation 45 CHAPTER V. New Birth and New Life. 1. Idea of New Birth in the Old Testament ... 48 2. Doctrine of John iii, 3-8 49 (1) Born from Above. 49 (2) Teaching of Titus iii, 5, and Eph. v, 26. . . 51 3. The Mystery of Spiritual Life 56 4. Passing out of Death into Life 59 CHAPTER VI. Sonship, Adoption, Assurance, and Spiritual Free dom. 1. A New Relationship 60 2. Heirs, Sons, Children, and Beloved Children of God. . 62 Contents. n PAGE 3. The Witness of the Spirit 64 4. Boldness and Confidence 65 5. Full Assurance 66 6. Christian Freedom. 67 CHAPTER VII. Progress in Spiritual Life. 1. New Life Involves Growth. 71 2. Elements of Spiritual Growth 72 3. Argument of Rom. vi. 74 4. Doctrine of 1 John iii, 9, 10. 75 5. Sanctification and Holiness. 77 6. Righteousness 80 (1) In the Teaching of Jesus 80 (2) The Doctrine of James 81 (3) The Doctrine of Peter 83 7. Christian Perfection 85 8. The Christian Virtues, Especially Perfect Love. . . 87 9. Continual Cultivation and Growth 91 10. The Discipline of Trial 92 CHAPTER VIII. Means and Methods of Promoting Spiritual Life. 1. The Fellowship of the Church 96 2. Aim of all Churchly Ministries 98 3. The Christian Sacraments 100 (1) Christian Baptism. 102 (2) The Lord's Supper 105 4. The Ministry of the Word 106 5. Exercise in Works of Practical Godliness. . . .111 6. Prayer. m 12 Contents. CHAPTER IX. Eternal Life. i. Meaning of the Phrase " Eternal Life." 2. Spiritual Light 3. Paul's View of Light and Liberty. 4. A Present Possession 5. Endless Permanence in Life (in John's Gospel). 6. Eternal Life in Synoptic Gospels. 7. The Teaching of the Epistles. . . PAGE 117Il8119121122I23124 CHAPTER X. Concluding Words. 1. Blessedness of the Way 127 2. Well Called the New Way 127 3. Well Called the Living Way. 128 4. Full of Comfort 129 5. Call to Deeper Interest in the Heavenlies. . . .129 THE NEW AND LIVING WAY. CHAPTER I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENTS TOUCHING SIN AND DEATH. To a thinking being there can be nothing more real or more certain than his own existence. The imme diate consciousness of his own personal experiences is a matter beyond which it is vain to carry any ra tional appeal. Man has also along with this assurance of his own personal being immediate cognizance of a world about him which is not himself, but of which he feels himself to be a part. He finds himself one of an innumerable company who exist amid conditions and experiences like his own. There comes with the grow ing knowledge of his own personality a perception of his dependence and his limitations. His various feel ings, perceptions, and activities are to every man the most real things in the world. And there are also certain convictions, ideas, or truths, which command the assent of all thinking men. They find expression everywhere and always as the unanimous judgment of mankind. They command recognition in all our con tinued processes of thought, and whatsoever contra dicts them can possess no authority over the human soul. 13 14 The New and Living Way. At the same time there are many profound ques tions of religion which force themselves upon our Necessary limit* attention and yet may be seen to lie so tions- far beyond the limits of our knowledge and of our faculties of knowledge that it is impossible for us to answer them. It is therefore important that we duly recognize both our capabilities and our limita tions. There have been dogmaticians who seem never to have been disturbed with a suspicion of their own competency to unravel all mysteries and all knowledge. They never stoop to analyze closely the principles or the methods of their own logical procedure; indeed, those who dogmatize most authoritatively seem gener ally quite unconscious of the need of logical method. They are even puzzled and confused when one ques tions their right to certain assumptions, or declines to accept their unverified conclusions. We shall seek in this little volume to direct the read er's attention to well-attested facts of Christian experi ence. Abstaining from all appearance Appeal to facts. . , . , , , . , . . of metaphysical speculation, and making continual appeal to that which may be repeatedly veri fied in the life of men,1 we shall endeavor to outline 1 In his epoch-making Kritik of Pure Reason Immanuel Kant points out the paralogisms of reason in all "transcendental dialectic,*' and maintains the impossibility of rational psychology, as transcending the powers of human reason, and so admonishes us that "nothing remains but to study the soul under the guidance of experience, and to keep ourselves within the limits of questions which do not go beyond the line where the material can be supplied by possible internal experience" (Max Mailer's translation, pp. 309, 310. London, 1896). We may take appeal to personal experience there seems no ground for doubt. The exception to some of Kant's positions, but as to the necessity of the Human Sinfulness. 15 the order and relations of the mighty working of the Holy Spirit whereby man enters into conscious favor and fellowship with God, becomes a coworker with him, and realizes his highest possibilities. Inasmuch as these doctrines of practical religious experience are of a nature to be verified by appeal to facts, we are not called upon in this presentation of them to entertain questions relating more specifically to the Godward side of the work of man's salvation. That this great salvation is the gift of God through the mediation of Jesus Christ is assumed throughout this entire exposi tion. The supernatural working of the Holy Spirit as the ever-living and immediate agent of "God in Christ reconciling the world unto himself" is both a fact and a doctrine of fundamental importance ; but, like the doc trine of God, the Father Almighty, it lies -outside the plan and scope of this volume, which deals exclusively with positive facts of human experience. We have first of all to make some note of the facts of human sinfulness. Our limits and scope do not permit us to enter upon a detailed dis- Human sinfulness. cussion of these various facts, but we must keep in mind that the personality of each human being consists of the self-conscious unity of intelli gence, sensibility, and the power of volition. The pos session of these godlike faculties exalts man above all other living creatures of the earth, and stamps him real experiences of sane men are not illusions, but the material out of which our understanding must formulate and estimate all truths that may be known. 16 The New and Living Way. with "the image and likeness of God." He is the creation and offspring of God. But along with this superior nature there exists in man the capacity for originating and perpetuating moral evil. Temptations of manifold character may assail the sensibility and the intellect, but these by themselves need not injure the moral nature; when promptly resisted they serve rather to strengthen the moral powers. But when by his own unnecessitated act of volition man knowingly transgresses the will of God there follows at once the consciousness of guilt. And so sin has entered into the world and is as widespread as the human race. It is an evil too terrible and too deeply seated in the human heart to be ignored. Man's natural constitution was made for goodness, and for the exercise of all pure and noble qualities, but sin in its working has brought all manner of moral disorder into the life and activities of the human race. It is not a mere matter of physical disturbance, or of bodily weakness and pain. It cannot be satisfactorily explained as arising from the necessary limitations and consequent imper fection of man as a dependent being; for then must it be necessarily inseparable from all creature life. The notion that matter is essentially evil, and that man's contact with material elements is the cause . or the explanation of his sinfulness, is incompatible with the real nature of sin. For sinfulness, wickedness, trans gression, and guilt are meaningless terms when ap plied to material elements ; they are predicable only of the spiritual nature of man. Similarly unsatisfactory Human Sinfulness. 17 and insufficient are all theories which seek to explain the facts of sin as necessary stages in the processes of human development. The only adequate explanation of sin, as we know it in personal experience, is that which traces it to free and responsible volition, and this explanation accords with the teaching of Scripture and the universal moral sense of mankind. The fact of guilt and shame as a consequence of transgression has its explanation, accordingly, in man's moral freedom. The power of the will to accept or reject an offered good, to keep or violate a given law, is a fundamental fact of our spiritual nature. It is implied in every commandment, warning, admonition, and exhortation to accept God's mercy or to obey the word of truth. According to 1 John iii, 4, "sin is law lessness" {avofiia), and a strict construction of this statement implies that sin is not only transgression of law, but also all contempt of law, and Sin concelved as all disconformity to law. The law of "»wie.«ie». God takes cognizance not of outward acts only, but also of the thoughts and intents of the heart. It searches the desires, the emotions, and all that enters into the moral life of man, and condemns every de parture from its perfect standard of righteousness. And so "all unrighteousness (ddiicia) is sin" (1 John v, 17), and lawlessness and transgression must needs place the sinner in a condition of separation from God. Conceived in the highest sense, the law of God is but a revelation of the nature of the Holy One himself, and must needs be "holy, and righteous, and good" 18 The New and Living Way. (Rom. vii, 12) ;' and therefore any personal discon- formity thereto involves alienation from God. Such alienation from God naturally begets an en mity toward God and a controlling, selfishness. The persistent sinner puts himself in the place of his Crea tor, and produces rebellion and disorder' in the moral Pauline doctrine world- According to the teaching of ofsin- Paul, the entire human race is under the general condemnation of sin. A sort of taint or corruption of the moral nature originated with the trespass of the first man, and has been universally propagated in the world.2 A spiritual deadness, "death through sin," is an idea which readily connects with the apostle's peculiar doctrine of "sin in the flesh." "When we were in the flesh," he says, "the sinful pas sions, which were through the law, wrought in our members to bring forth fruit unto death" (Rom. vii, 5). He speaks of the "likeness of the flesh of sin," of "walking after the flesh," and "minding the things of the flesh." He declares that "the mind of the flesh is 1 So Wesley in his sermon on the text cited above: "This law is an incorruptible picture of the high and holy One that inhabiteth eternity. ... It is the face of God unveiled; God manifested to his creatures as they are able to bear it. . . . It is the heart of God disclosed to man. Yea, in some sense we may apply to this law what the apostle says of his Son, it is the streaming forth of his glory, the express image of his person." — Sermons, vol. i, p. 309. New York, 1854. 2 It is worthy of note that the peculiar concept of sin as originating with one man and passing thence unto all men, "for that all sinned" (Rom. v, 12), is peculiar to Paul. No other biblical writer has set forth such a doctrine as that "through the one man's disobedience the many were made sinners" (verse 19). Compare, however, Fourth Ezra iii, 7; Apocalypse of Baruch xvii, 3; xxiii, 4; Ecclesiasticus xxv, 24; and see Meyer's and Sanday's Commentaries on Romans, in loco. Pauline View of Sin. 19 death," and "if ye live after the flesh, ye must die" (Rom. viii, 3-6, 13). In these and other parallel state ments the word flesh evidently denotes the lower, sen suous nature of man, dominated by sin, and thus exer cising control over the conscience and the spiritual life. The apostle does not think of sin as originating in the sensuous nature; much less does he hold the doctrine of an inherent and necessary sinfulness of the flesh, or conceive of matter as essentially sinful. His doc trine is profound and far-reaching. He makes use of those Greek words (djuoprta, Trapdfiaoig, napdnTUna) which designate sin as a culpable missing of the mark, a violation, transgression, and trespass of known law through the exercise of personal volition. Sin thus entered the world by the trespass of one man; it has abounded through many trespasses and "reigned in death," and, accordingly, the sinfulness of man is rep resented as a state of death. Those who live in the lusts of the flesh are "dead through trespasses and sins" (Eph. ii, 1, 5; comp. v, 14; Col. ii, 13); and "the mind of the flesh is death" (Rom. viii, 6). James also tells us that "sin, when it is full-grown, bringeth forth death" (i, 15). When, therefore, Paul speaks of death as "the wages of sin" (Rom. vi, 23), and as having passed unto all men because of sin (v, 12), he contemplates, not the separation of man's body and soul in physical death, but the alienation of the spirit ual nature of man from God, which is the sure result of sin. "The sting of death is sin" (1 Cor. xv, 56), and sin, in order to manifest its destructive nature as 20 The New and Living Way. sin, works so as to bring about spiritual death through a righteous law deeply written in the moral nature of man (Rom. vii, 13). This condition of spiritual death, as the penal consequence of sin, involves "wrath and indignation, tribulation, and anguish upon every soul of man that worketh evil" (Rom. ii, 8, 9), and the certain death announced as the penalty of man's first disobedience (Gen. ii, 17) is to be understood as the moral and spiritual deadness which follows willful transgression and constitutes the fearful curse of sin.1 The universal sinfulness of man is a fact everywhere recognized in the Scriptures, and is often spoken of as the common depravity of the race. It is depicted by psalmists and prophets as congenital with every one that is born of woman. There are certain forms of Guilt not trans- evil which may be perpetuated by missibie. heredity, and God is said to "visit the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, upon the third and upon the fourth generation" (Exod. xx, 5 ; Num. xiv, 18). But such visitation of evil upon suc cessive generations is not to be construed as an im putation of personal guilt. It is impossible in the 1 The widespread notion that physical death is a penal consequence of Adam's sin has been a natural inference, perhaps, from our familiar ity with the death penalty for capital crime, and with its solemn sanction in the Mosaic laws. But this is a mistaken inference. The law of decay and dissolution is a part of the order stamped on the nature of all living organisms, both animal and vegetable. Ages be fore man appeared on earth this law was working in all such organisms, and there is no sufficient reason to suppose that, if sin had never entered the world, man would have been any exception to this univer sal law. Physical death may at times take on aggravated forms by reason of sin in the sufferer, but in itself need not be considered an evil or a necessary result of sin. Degrees of Sin and Guilt. 21 nature of things that either guilt or righteousness should be transmitted from parent to child. Hence it is written, "The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers : every man shall be put to death for his own sin" (Deut. xxiv, 16; 2 Kings xiv, 6; Jer. xxxi, 29, 30). "The soul that sinneth, it shall die: the son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son ; the righteous ness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him" (Ezek. xviii, 20). Hence we should avoid the unscriptural and misleading notion that depravity, as transmitted or inherited, carries with it elements of personal guilt. Only as the free conscious soul personally appro priates the depravity, and makes it part and parcel of his own individual life, can any punishable guilt be justly imputed.1 Different degrees of sin and guilt are recognized in the Scriptures and in the moral sense of man. Sin becomes deepened and strengthened in . ,.,,." Degrees of guilt. the heart by continuous disobedience and resistance of the calls of God, and most culpable obduracy is the result. Degrees of guilt are estimated by the position, knowledge, abilities, and relative re sponsibility of individuals and of communities. Jesus spoke of those who should be "beaten with many 1 Compare Whedon on the Will, in his able chapter on "The Free Appropriation of Our Depraved Nature," pp. 338-343. New York, 1892. Also Miley, Systematic Theology, on the "Doctrine of Native Demerit," vol. i, pp. 510-533. 22 The New and Living Way. stripes and with few stripes" (Luke xii, 47), and he declared that it would be more tolerable in the judg ment for Sodom and Gomorrah than for the city that rejected his Gospel (Matt, x, 15). A persistent hard ening of one's heart may be carried to the extreme of quenching the Holy Spirit (1 Thess. v, 19), and in volving oneself in the guilty bonds of "an eternal sin" (Mark iii, 29). For a fixed habit of willful rejection of God's open truth results in an unchangeableness of character which daringly closes the only door of hope, keeps crucifying Christ afresh, and faces with stoical indifference "a certain fearful expectation of judgment and a fierceness of fire which shall devour the ad versaries" (Heb. vi, 4-8; x, 26, 27). Our survey of the "new and living way" which leads into "the secret place of the Most High" must first of all take cognizance of these facts of human sinful ness. Out of all this darkness, culpability, and wretch edness of sin and death there is "a The way of life. pure highway, and it is called the way of holiness" (Isa. xxxv, 8). It is "the way of the tree of life" (Gen. iii, 24) ; "the way of the righteous" (Psa. i, 6), and "the way of Jehovah" (Jer. v, 4) ; "the way of peace" (Isa. lix, 8; Luke i, 79), and "the way of the truth" (2 Pet. ii, 2) ; "the way of salvation" (Acts xvi, 17), "the narrow (or straitened)2 way that leadeth unto life" (Matt. 1 So the Septuagint, odor icadapi, which here seems to evince a better text than that of the Masorites. » The Greek word is TeMifi/zevr;, compressed, restricted. Clement of Alexandria, about the beginning of the third century, wrote: "The Gos- The Way of Life. 23 vii, 14), "the way of the Lord," and "the way of God" (Acts xviii, 25, 26), which, in the Acts of the Apostles, is repeatedly called "the way" (ix, 2 ; xix, 9, 23 ; xxii, 4; xxiv, 14, 22), as if thereby to emphasize the Chris tian religion as the only true path of life. Jesus calls himself "the way, and the truth and the life" (John xiv, 6), because, as Paul puts it (Eph. ii, 18), "Through him we have our access in one Spirit unto the Father." pel supposes two ways, one narrozv and confined, which is circumscribed according to commandments and prohibitions, and the opposite one, which leads to destruction, is broad and roomy." — Stromata, book v, chap. v. Compare the opening words of the Teaching of the Twelve- Apostles: "Two ways there are, one of life and one of death." 24 The New and Living Way. CHAPTER II. CONVICTION, REPENTANCE, AND CONVERSION. According to the foregoing chapter our study of the way of salvation must needs take opfirjv), a great opportunity, and "through the commandment wrought in me all manner 28 The New and Living Way. of coveting" (verse 8) ; and so, to the same extent that "sin sprung up into life," my better nature died. "Did then the good become death to me?" he asks in verse 13. No, no, he answers, but by the operation of the good and holy law sin itself has been displayed as preeminently sinful. Its true nature, its deadly working, is thus brought to light, and the law of God in its inmost essence is recognized as spiritual, divine, possessing the power and character of the Holy Spirit for the work of conviction of sin (comp. John xvi, 8). In verse 14 we notice a change of tense from past to present. It serves the purpose of rhetorical emphasis, and aims to set as in. a living picture before the read er's eye the life and death struggle of an awakened sinner. The writer continues the use of the first per son, for he undoubtedly is giving his own personal experience as memory and deep emotion combine to make it very present to his thought. The three words employed in verses 15, 18, and 21 — "I understand not" (ov yivuxTKu), "I know" (olda), "I find" (evpioKu) — are suggestive of various aspects of the struggle, and may perhaps be regarded in their connection as involving an enslavement of the understanding, the affections, and the will. For in verses 14-17 Tie repre sents his understanding as in some sort of bonds; in 18-20 he shows how the fleshly nature has dominion over him; and in 21-24 tne law in his members which wars against the law of his mind keeps bringing him into such a bitter consciousness of captivity to the law of sin that he cries out in agony of spirit, "O wretched Repentance. 29 man that I am !" He conceives himself bound fast to a dead body, the body of a sinful human nature, which he has already, in vi, 6, spoken of as "our old man" and "the body of sin." Such an analysis of the conviction of sin in a human soul could be made only by a mind of deep spiritual insight. It is a diagnosis of personal experience which only the most gifted and spiritual among men can fully appreciate. But a similar conviction of sin," wrought in the heart by the Spirit of God, yet varying greatly with different individuals, has been the experi ence of millions. To some extent it is manifest in the little child when he first comes to know good and evil ; it is often very powerful in the wayward youth, when arrested by some call of God and brought to acknowl edge his sin and folly; it is sometimes overwhelming in a hardened sinner, who has long stifled convictions of truth and right, and at last comes to genuine re pentance. Such great varieties of personal experience are capable, however, in the last analysis, of such a portrayal as that found in Rom. vii. When such conviction of sin is accompanied by a real sorrow of heart and strong desire to escape from its condemnation and turn unto God it Repentance. becomes what is called repentance. This term is commonly defined as a godly sorrow for sin, a definition warranted by the language of 2 Cor. vii, 10 : "Godly sorrow worketh repentance unto salva tion ;" although in this statement the apostle has promi nently in mind the sadness (Xvirfj) and mourning 30 The New and Living Way. (ddvpfiog) which his former epistle had caused the Corinthians. The New Testament word for repent ance is fierdvoca, and means a change of mind; but in usage it means more than a mere change of opinion or sentiment. It is a moral change, and involves not only a deep sorrow for sin, but also an abhorrence of it ; a loathing of its guilt and shame, and a yearning to be delivered from its power. In fact, the usage of the word in the New Testament seems to presuppose that the truly penitent soul always turns to God and finds forgiveness of sin. It may, then, be inferred that as a rule every sinner, in whom God's holy law reveals the damning power of sin, and who truly repents of his sins, experiences a change of mind and of spiritual^ character. To use words peculiar to John, he "passes out of -death into life" (i John iii, 14; John v, 24). Therefore the change is spoken of in Acts xi, 18, as a "repentance unto life," and in 2 Tim. ii, 25, as "re pentance unto a full knowledge of truth." It is a change of heart that at once tends toward life, and leads unto the knowledge of God's truth and love. Such turning unto God which accompanies re pentance is called conversion (kmorpofyrj.) We observe that the exhortation of Acts iii, 10, Conversion. 7 is, "Repent ye therefore, and turn ye (kmoTpeipare, be ye converted), that your sins may be blotted out." The conversion of men to Christ by the ministry of the apostles is called a "turning unto the Lord" (Acts ix, 35 ; xi, 21 ; xv, 19). The preaching of Paul, both to Jews and Conversion. 31 Gentiles, was "to open their eyes and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they might receive remission of sins." His declaration was "that they should repent and turn to God, doing works worthy of repentance" (Acts xxvi, 18-20). "The conversion of the Gentiles" (Acts xv, 3) means their turning away from their former habits of life, from the sins and immoralities to which they had been addicted, and from the service of idols, to the adoption of a new and better life (comp. 1 Thess. i, 9; Eph. ii, 11-13; iv, 17-25; v, 8; Col. i, 21). Thus conversion, in the full Christian sense, involves re pentance and a turning from sin to the service of the living God. It involves a radical revolution of the course of life, by which a new direction is given to all the activities of mind and soul and heart. Hence its necessary connection with remission of sins as well as with conviction of sin and the godly sorrow which true repentance shows. In Rom. ii, 4, Paul speaks of the goodness of God as leading (dya>, in the sense of moving and direct ing) unto repentance, and in Acts v, 31 ; xi, 18; 2 Tim. ii, 25, repentance is referred to as a gift of God. But if it be a gift of God some one will ask why then man should be called on to repent and turn to God. The matter explains itself when we keep in mind the doc trine of conviction of sin as already described. There can be no genuine repentance in the soul without an antecedent conviction of sin by the revealing law and Spirit of God. In thinking of repentance as God's gift 32 The New and Living Way. we have in mind the indispensable gracious conditions which lead to repentance. God first flashes light upon the darkened understanding ; he reveals the knowledge of sin, and by the working of his Holy Spirit begets a longing for deliverance from sin. All this is the neces sary preliminary to a godly sorrow for sin, and may well be spoken of as the gift of God. But when all this work of conviction is wrought in the heart it yet remains for the conscious soul with its own freedom of will to respond to such calls to repentance as we find in Matt, iii, 2, 8; iv, 17; Mark i, 15 ; Luke xiii, 3, 5 ; Acts ii, 38 ; iii, 19 ; viii, 22. After this manner we also see both the self-consistency and the significance of such apparently contradictory statements as those of Jesus in John vi, 44, and v, 40 : "No man can come to me, except the Father draw him," and "Ye will not come to me, that ye may have life." It is the part of God first to draw and lead by the convicting operations of his Spirit; and after this is done, or rather in con nection with it, the penitent sinner must himself repent and turn unto God. So repentance may be conceived and spoken of both as a responsible act of the con victed sinner and also as a gracious gift of God. The Doctrine of Faith. 33 CHAPTER III. THE DOCTRINE OF FAITH. There is a somewhat mystical doctrine of faith peculiar to the writings of Paul. We read in Eph. ii, 8, "By grace have ye been saved Doctrlne o£ Paul through faith ; and that not of your- Eph- "• 8- selves ; God's is the gift." Some interpreters here un derstand the demonstrative tovto, that, to refer to the word faith immediately preceding ; but in that case we surely should have had the feminine avrr] to corre spond with mong, which is always feminine. The pronoun refers rather to the idea of being saved (the oeouafiivov elvai) by grace which is made emphatic in the preceding clause. The foregoing context shows that this gracious gift of salvation is a quickening and raising up into spiritual life of those who were "dead through trespasses and sins." The merit and glory of it all are ascribed to the mercy, love, kindness, and grace of God in Jesus Christ. This way of salvation is spoken of in Eph. iii, 10-12, as an exhibition of "the manifold wisdom of God, according to a purpose of the ages which he purposed in Christ Jesus our Lord, in whom we have boldness and access in confidence through our faith in him." Repentance leads unto this great salvation, but the saving grace must, according to Paul, be appropriated by an act of faith in God. 3 34 The New and Living Way. "Repent ye, and believe in the Gospel," says Jesus (Mark i, 15). Hence it is obviously improper to call faith a gift of God when the word is used in reference to a responsible act and attitude of an individual.1 Faith that appropriates the saving grace of God and leads to salvation is a free act of the soul. Man is called upon to "have faith in God," to "believe on the Lord Jesus Christ," and the belief required is not merely an assent of the mind to that which is good, nor the exercise of reason and judgment in approving wholesome doctrines. It is a conscious willing sur render of the heart to the righteous claims of God, and a throwing oneself, so to speak, in full confidence on the divine Saviour. In the highest and holiest sense, faith is trust.2 1 The different concepts and shades of meaning which attach to the word TrvBTic in the New Testament is a question by itself. In some passages it may connote the antecedents and consequences of the act of saving faith, and be spoken of as a divine possession (i Cor. xii, 9; James ii, *, 14); in others it seems to be used as meaning the substance of the Gospel itself (Gal. i, 23; Eph. iv, 13; Jude, verses 3 and 20; and perhaps 1 Tim. i, 19; iv, 1; v, 8); in others it suggests the idea of fidelity (Titus ii, 10; Gal. v, 22). These secondary and modified meanings of the word have no necessary connection with the Pauline doctrine of faith as means and condition of salvation. See Lightfoot's dissertation on "The Words Denoting Faith" in his Epistle to the Galatians, pp. 154-158. London, 1890. 2 "The term faith can scarcely be said to occur at all in the Hebrew Scriptures of the Old Testament. It is indeed a characteristic token of the difference between the two covenants, that under the law the 'fear of the Lord' holds very much the same place as 'faith in God,' 'faith in Christ,' under the Gospel. Awe is the prominent idea in the earlier dispensation, trust in the later. At the same time, though .the word itself is not found in the Old Testament, the idea is not absent; for indeed a trust in the Infinite and Unseen, subordinating thereto all interests that are finite and transitory, is the very essence of the higher spiritual life." — Lightfoot, Epistle to the Galatians, p. 159. Fourth of Romans. 35 The great theme of the Epistle to the Romans is the doctrine that the Gospel "is the power of God unto salvation to everyone who believes." Epist]e t0 tne Having shown that the whole world is Komans- fallen under the condemning judgment of God, the apostle announces as a fundamental truth that "now, apart from the law, a righteousness of God has been manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets ; even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ unto all them that believe" (iii, 21, 22). Here is presented in substance the whole Pauline idea of the attainment of personal righteousness. It is not by the performance of the works of the law ; it comes not by way of merit from anything which fallen man can do ; it comes solely by an act of faith in the efficacy of "the redemption that is in Jesus Christ, whom God set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood." The faith which is here contemplated is a sort of means and condition of receiving the benefit of re demption. It is an act and also a subjective state or attitude of the soul for which the person hoping to be saved is held responsible. In the fourth chapter of Romans this idea of saving faith is illustrated in a number of points by the ex ample of Abraham. It is pointed out r Rom. iv. (1) that the patriarch's trust in God "was reckoned unto him for righteousness." It was, accordingly, not by works, but by an act of faith, that he was accounted righteous before God, and his sub jective relation to the judgment of God was clearly a 36 The New and Living Way. faith-righteousness (verses 1-5). (2) A confirmation of this doctrine is also found in David's words (Psa. xxxii, 1, 2), where they are pronounced blessed "whose sins are covered," and "to whom the Lord will not reckon sin" (6-8). (3) The apostle next shows that this blessedness came to Abraham before he had received the sign and seal of circumcision, and must therefore be independent of such outward rites (9-12). (4) For the same reason this righteousness of faith is also apart from works of law, for it cannot be attained through that which works wrath by its fearful revelation of the damning guilt of sin (13-17). (5) Abraham's faith, moreover, was an example of unwavering confidence in God's word. "Believing in hope against hope," and having his heart set on God's promise, "he wavered not through unbelief, but waxed strong through faith, giving glory to God, and being fully assured that what he had promised he was able also to perform" (18-22). Finally, (6) he alleges that this sublime example of faith in God stands written in the Scriptures as a monumental witness for all be lievers in Jesus Christ (23-25). This example of Abraham is also adduced in the Epistle to the Gala tians (iii, 6-29), and is there made to establish the same doctrine of faith as the means of justification. But in the Epistle of James (ii, 21-23) the ^a'tn °f Abraham as shown in his readiness to offer Isaac upon „ „ . « T the altar is brought forward to prove Doctrine of James. ° r that faith is not only essential to initiate the believer in righteousness, but also to carry forward Paul and James. 37 the new life of devotion to God. In this later example written in the history of Abraham it is seen "that the faith wrought with his works, and (as a result issu ing) from the works the faith was made perfect." The substance of doctrine in both Paul and James is cer tainly in accord with the fundamental truth that any and every soul of man who has been convicted of sin, and repents and turns unto God in faith, must also "do works worthy of repentance" (Acts xxvi, 20; comp. Matt, iii, 8; Luke iii, 8). Paul makes it very emphatic that one who becomes dead to sin cannot any longer live therein (Rom. vi, 1). It is not, therefore, in any fundamental way that James and Paul differ in their teaching about faith and justification before God. But they do differ, and each writer is to be studied and estimated by a careful attention to his peculiar point of view. James wishes to give strong testimony against such as are forgetful hearers and not actual doers of the word of truth (i, 22-25), and he insists rightly that the only faith which is genuine and profitable is that which is shown by good works (ii, 14-18). This is an aspect of faith which Paul, according to Gal. v, 6, could certainly not oppose. Still another concept of faith is set forth in the Epistle to the Hebrews, and definitely described as the "substance of things hoped for, a Epistle t0 tne conviction of things not seen" (xi, 1). Hebrews- As the etymology of the Greek word translated sub stance (vnoaracFig) suggests, faith is here conceived as the underlying basis of the believer's hopes, and at the 38 The New and Living Way. same time as a profound inward conviction (eAey^oc, proof) of' the reality of things not seen by fleshly eyes. This conception of faith, as illustrated by the examples of ancient worthies mentioned in this chapter, contem plates that holy trust in God which leads to active and loving obedience. It is, perhaps, more closely related to the doctrine of James than to the Pauline idea of a faith apart from the works of the law. Nevertheless, the faith by which we apprehend the work of God in creation (verse 3) is essentially the same as that by which we apprehend the grace of God in Jesus Christ. The faith of Abel is conceived as the means "through which he had witness borne to him that he was right eous" (verse 4). And all the godly acts and heavenly hopes of the long list of worthies were inspired by a conviction and assurance of invisible realities akin to what the repentant sinner realizes when he accepts the redemption of Christ. In every case "the one who comes to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that seek after him" (verse 6). Such faith ever tends "to a preserving of the soul" (elg nepinoiriaiv ipv%r\g, Heb. x, 39). Whether exercised by the penitent sinner or by the hopeful saint, it unites the confiding soul with God. The doctrine of faith occupies a prominent place in the teaching of Jesus. His earliest preaching was, Doctrine of faith "Repent ye, and believe in the gospel" in Gospels. (Mark {> I5)j and his ,atest commjs. sion, according to Mark xvi, 16, "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved ; but he that disbelieveth Jesus' Teaching on Faith. 39 shall be condemned." Here faith is obviously an act and responsible attitude of trust, and is made a condi tion of salvation. A corresponding passage in John's Gospel (iii, 36) is in noticeable harmony with the main elements of the Pauline doctrine: "He that be lieveth on the Son hath eternal life ; but he that obeyeth not the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him." In his works of healing Jesus made much of the faith in him which was exercised by those who sought his help. "O woman, great is thy faith !" he exclaimed before the Canaanitish woman who besought him for her daughter (Matt, xv, 28; comp. viii, 10; ix, 2, and Luke vii, 9). To another woman he said, "Daughter, be of good cheer ; thy faith hath saved thee. And the woman was saved from that hour" (Matt, ix, 22). To the blind men who cried for his favor he said, "According to your faith be it done unto you. And their eyes were opened" (Matt, ix, 29). He taught his disciples that they might remove mountains by faith (Matt, xvii, 20; xxi, 21; Mark xi, 23; comp. 1 Cor. xiii, 2), and said in the same connection, "All things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive." He seems almost to employ hyperbole when he declares, "All things are possible to him that be lieveth" (Mark ix, 23). Many other examples in the Synoptic Gospels teach the same doctrine of faith, as a condition and means of obtaining the gracious help of God and of Christ. In the Gospel of John, as the one passage already 40 The New and Living Way. cited shows, faith is essential to salvation in Christ. "The right to become children of God" is given "to them that believe on his name" (i, 12; comp. ii, 23; iii, 18 ; 1 John iii, 23 ; v, 13). * The great text in iii, 16, affirms that "whosoever believeth on" the only begotten Son of God shall not perish, but have eternal life. In v, 24, it is declared that "he who heareth my word and believeth on him that sent me, hath eternal life, and cometh not into judgment." The same truth is reiter ated in one form and another so as to be a characteris tic formula of this Johannine Gospel (comp. vi, 29, 35, 47; vii, 38; ix, 35-38; xi, 25, 26; xiv, 1, 11, 12). In fact this Gospel claims to have been written "that ye may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye may have life in his name" (xx, 31). The act of personal confession may also well be mentioned in connection with this doctrine of faith. The two are closely associated in Rom. Confession. J x, 9, 10 : "If thou wilt confess the word with thy mouth, that Jesus is Lord, and wilt believe in thy heart that God raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved; for with the heart one believes unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation." Some such confession of Christ is spoken of in Luke xii, 8, 9, as opposed to a denial in the presence of men (comp. Matt, x, 32; 1 John iv, 1 It is worthy of note that the word faith (ttiotic) does not occur in John's Gospel, and appears only once in the Epistle (i John v, 4), where it is called "the victory that overcame the world." Confession. 41 2, 3, 15). In the initial experience of salvation con fession of sins must needs accompany the act of faith and the confession of Jesus Christ as Lord ; for "if we confess our sins, he is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteous ness" (1 John i, 9; comp. Matt, iii, 6). 42 The New and Living Way. CHAPTER IV. FORGIVENESS OF SINS, JUSTIFICATION, AND RECONCILIATION. According to the words of Acts iii, 19, repentance and conversion are essentially preliminary to the blot- Greek, words for ting out of sins (Td VSffo&W" ™? remission. djuaprtac), and the personal act of faith is the means whereby this blessed result is realized. But this idea of a removel of sin as a blotting out, wiping off, erasure, or obliteration (efaA«6>) of the sins of a human soul calls for separate, examination. There are two Greek words in the New Testament which especially deserve our attention in connection with this subject, namely, dtpeaig (dfiapnuv) and Swaiou. The former may be translated remission, pardon, or forgiveness of sins ; the latter means rather to justify, acquit, clear from guilt, pronounce righteous. Both terms contain a measure of forensic and juridical sig nificance, and suggest the idea of a prisoner, a debtor, or a guilty person, whose merited penalty is discharged by order of a competent court. When such an act of pardon restores friendly relations between the offender and the party who has been wronged, it not only remits the penalty, but may also include the further idea of personal forgiveness, so that reconciliation is effected between those who were at enmity. Applying these analogies to the relations between a guilty sin- Justification. 43 ner and the most holy God, we may discern a wonder ful depth of meaning in such a statement as that of 2 Cor. v, 19 : "God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself, not reckoning unto them their tres passes." The trespasses are blotted out, removed, reckoned as if they had not been. According to Paul the sinner is freely justified through faith by the grace of God (Rom. iii, 24), and being thus justified he has "peace with God," and access into a state of blessed and glorious hope, having the love of God shed abroad in his heart by the Holy Spirit (Rom. v, 1-4). "We reckon therefore," he says (iii, 28), "that a man is justified by faith apart from the works of the law." He maintains (vii, 6) that "we have been discharged from the law, having died to that in which we were held down, so as to serve in newness of spirit." The wretched captive, whose struggle we saw depicted in Rom. vii, 15-25, accepts by faith the gracious pardon, obtains remission of sins, and "thanks God through Jesus Christ our Lord." The chief peculiarity of Paul's doctrine of justifica tion by faith is the intensity with which he conceives it as proceeding from the saving grace Peci,iiarity of r 1- 1 tx -it. „~.„1« ^t Paul's doctrine. of God. He sees in the example ot Abraham that "faith was reckoned unto him for right eousness" (Rom. iv, 3), and the whole gospel of Christ is to him the revelation of "a righteousness of God" (Siitaioovvri ¦deov, Rom. i, 17). It is "a right eousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ unto all them that believe" (Rom. iii, 22). The word 44 The New and Living Way. "righteousness" here is not to be understood as an attribute of God in the sense of his divine justice; it is a righteousness which proceeds from God, and is extolled as a "free gift" (xdpiofia), and a "gift in grace" (dwped kv xdpin, Rom. v, 15-17). He calls it in Phil. iii, 9, "that which is through faith in Christ, the right eousness from God (kic ¦deov) on the condition of faith." This righteousness or justification (for both these ideas run together in the word) is the gracious state which results immediately from the acquittal which goes with the forgiveness of sin.1 If it seem astonishing that the "righteous Judge of all the earth," who re vealed himself to Abraham as one who will distinguish between the righteous and the wicked (Gen. xviii, 25), should be declared by Paul to be God who "justifieth the ungodly" (Rom. iv, 5), let it be observed that the divine justification goes forth only "to him that be lieveth." "The righteousness which is of faith" insists that God's free gift comes not to every sinner; only to him who makes the needful confession, and "with the heart believeth unto righteousness" shall the salva tion of God'be given (Rom. x, 6-10). To all such "God reckons righteousness apart from works" (Rom. iv, 6, 11) in the fact that he reckons faith for right eousness, as in the case of Abraham. The sinner who 1 In the strict legal sense, as Merrill has observed, "pardon differs from acquittal. The latter term is applied where guilt is charged but not established. The innocent man, when found to be innocent, is acquitted. He is not pardoned, but justified as an innocent man. In such case there is ho forgiveness. But the sinner is not innocent. The dreadful fact of his guilt is established, and cannot be ignored." — Aspects of Christian Experience, p. 79. Cincinnati, 1^82. Reconciliation. 45 "believes unto righteousness" is accordingly treated by God as freed from guilt and "from the law of sin and of death" (Rom. viii, 2). The act of faith on the part of the convicted and penitent sinner is accordingly followed by the gracious act of justification on the part of God. The result of this divine act of pardon is a state of reconciliation and peace between God and the believer. We have seen that, according to Paul, «ii • 1 r .1 n . • . ,. Reconciliation. the mind of the flesh is enmity (?##pa) against God" (Rom. viii, 7) ; but "being justified by faith we have peace with God through Jesus Christ" (Rom. v, 1). This peace (eip^vrj) involves the removal of the enmity, and the infusion of holy love and joy within the heart. This blessed result of heavenly grace is called in Rom. v, 11, "the reconciliation" (¦}) KaraXXayq)j and in the immediate context the apostle writes : "If, being enemies, we were reconciled to God through the death of his Son, much more, being recon ciled, shall we be saved in his life" (verse 10). This idea of reconciliation finds further expression in 2 Cor. v, 18-20 ; "All things are of God who reconciled us to himself through Christ, and gave us the ministry of reconciliation; to wit, that God was in Christ recon ciling the world unto himself, not reckoning unto them their trespasses, and having placed in us the word of the reconciliation."1 This "word of the reconciliation" 1 "The apostle starts from his personal experience of reconciliation, that God in Christ graciously changed him, the enemy and persecutor, into the preacher of his work of reconciliation." — Beyschlag, New Testament Theology, vol. ii, p. 161. 46 The New and Living Way. is a sacred deposit in the hearts of those who lfke Paul had received a commission to preach this doctrine of reconciliation. They became ambassadors of Christ, and went about entreating men to "be reconciled to God." Such a ministry of reconciliation was not differ ent from that "word which God sent unto the children of Israel, preaching good tidings of peace by Jesus Christ," mentioned in Acts x, 36. The preaching of this reconciliation is the preaching of "peace with God through Jesus Christ" which follows the free pardon of sin. This work of reconciliation through Christ is spoken of in Eph. ii, 14-18, as a removal of enmity between Jew and Gentile, and effecting peace between them both and God; thereby Christ "reconciled them both in one body unto God through the cross, having slain the enmity thereby; and he came and preached good tidings of peace to you that were far off (Gen tiles), and peace to them that were nigh (Jews) ; for through him we both have access in one Spirit unto the Father." In a similar way, we are told in Col. i, 20-22, of God's "reconciling all things unto him self, having made peace through the blood of the cross," so that those who were once aliens and enemies in their evil works had become reconciled to him so as, to be "presented before him holy and without blemish and unreprovable."1 This happy reconciliation with God is something to be received (Rom. v, 11 : Xafifidvw, 1 The word employed in these passages in Ephesians and Colossians is a/KOKxnaT^Acou, to reconcile completely and thoroughly. It seems to be a somewhat stronger form of expressing the main idea in karaTiTiiaaa. Reconciliation. 47 lay hold of; claim and take into possession as one's own blessed boon). But though appropriated by the act of faith, it is a gracious provision coming from the love of God for his enemies (Rom. v, 10). It is, in per sonal experience, the result of conviction of sin, repent ance, turning to God, believing in Christ, receiving forgiveness of sins and justification before God. According to Cremer, KXtTaXkdcau "is the setting up of a relationship of peace not before existing, awoKaraXldaau is the restoration of a relationship of peace which has been disturbed." — Biblico-Theological Lexicon of New Testament Greek. 48 The New and Living Way. CHAPTER V. NEW BIRTH AND NEW LIFE. But all these personal experiences of conviction, repentance, faith, forgiveness of sin and reconciliation with God do not exhaust the mighty Other truths. . b. J working of the power from on high whereby sinful man is brought into conscious favor and fellowship with God. Other truths vitally con nected with these experiences of the soul appear in the biblical writings and are attested by an innumerable company of Christian believers. Chief among these is that mysterious work of the Holy Spirit which we com monly call regeneration, or the new birth. The idea of a new spiritual life, begotten as by a special creative act of God, appears in various parts New heart in old of the °ld Testament. It is suggested Testament. ^y the metaphor of the circumcision of the heart in Deut. x, 16; xxx, 6; Jer. iv, 4. It seems implied in 1 Sam. x, 9, where God gives Saul "another heart." It finds strong expression in the penitential psalm (li, 10), "Create for me a clean heart, O God, and renew a right spirit within me." It is set forth in language of remarkable spiritual depth and beauty in Ezek. xi, 19, and xxxvi, 26: "I will give you a new heart, and a new spirit will I put within you; and I will take away the heart of stone from your flesh, and Begotten from Above. 49 will give you a heart of flesh ; and my Spirit will I put within you." All these scriptures imply a radical change in the spiritual nature of man ; not of course the creation of new substance, but such a quickening of all the forces of spiritual life as to produce another mode of life. The most direct and positive teaching in the New Testament on this subject is found in the Gospel of John (iii, 3-8), where Jesus says, "Ex- , , , ;» John iii, 3-8. cept a man be born from above (avu&ev), he cannot see the kingdom of God." The word dvwdev in this connection seems to mean from above rather than again, as frequently translated. It occurs again in verse 31 of the same chapter in the statement, "He that cometh from above is above all." In John xix, 11, Jesus says to Pilate, "Thou wouldest have no power against me, except it were given thee from above." The word has also this meaning in the Epistle of James, where it is said that "every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights" (i, 17) and where the wisdom is extolled "which cometh down from above" (iii, 15, 17). And so we understand that the new birth, of which Jesus speaks in John iii, 3-8, is the originating of a new life in the soul by the infu sion of a living germ from above, that is, "from God," "from heaven," or "out of heaven," whence Jesus him self came (comp. verses 2 and 13, and John vi, 38, 41, 42, 50). The mystery of this generation from above is deepened by the statement of verse 5 : "Except a man be born of water and Spirit he cannot enter into 4 50 The New and Living Way. the kingdom of God." The common interpretation, which makes the words "born of water" mean the out ward performance of baptism in water, has never been able to make itself thoroughly satisfactory.. It seems inexplicably strange that our Lord should have thus spoken of Christian baptism to "a ruler of the Jews" at the time and under the circumstances supposed.1 That he should have aimed to set him thinking deeply on "heavenly things" (rd knovpdvia, verse 12), is every way supposable, and accords with his remarkable spiritual language to the woman of Samaria and to others. But for him, in a conversation with Nicode mus, to declare most solemnly that the outward cere mony or rite of baptism with water is essential in order to enter into the kingdom of God, is certainly amazing. It is not only out of harmony with the profound spiritual teaching of John's Gospel, but it also stands in conflict with the letter and spirit of Jesus's words against the "blind Pharisee," who seeks only to "cleanse the outside of the cup and the platter" (Matt. xxiii, 25, 26 ; Luke xi, 39 ; Mark vii, 4) . That baptism with water is indeed a symbol of the "washing of re generation" (Titus iii, 5) is true enough, but to co ordinate it with regeneration, so as to make it a neces- 1 Bernhard Weiss, in his edition of Meyer's Handbook on John, affirms that "it is historically inconceivable that Jesus should have spoken to Nicodemus of Christian baptism." Weiss maintains that water and Spirit "are simply coordinated, the water being conceived in its essence as a purifying factor, the Spirit as the efficient creative principle of the new life." But the main trouble is to recognize the water of ritual baptism as a "coordinate" factor along with the creative power of the Spirit. Some think that the words "water and" are an early interpolation. Washing of Regeneration. 51 sary condition of entrance into the kingdom of God, is to teach "baptismal regeneration" and a "sacramen- tarian salvation," which are repudiated by all Protes tant Christendom. Post-apostolic connotations of bap tism and of other external ordinances have been so long read into words and phrases of the New Testament that to question a current interpretation is to expose oneself to the charge of a lack of candor. So it has come to pass that the phrases "washing Tih]s m 5 and of regeneration" (Titus iii, 5) and "the ep"-v-2|5- washing of the water in the word" (Eph. v, 26) are claimed with an air of authority to refer necessarily to Christian baptism.1 But in the first passage it is said that "God our Saviour, not by works in righteousness which we did ourselves, but according to his mercy saved us through washing of regeneration and renew ing of the Holy Spirit which he poured out upon us richly." Now this washing of regeneration is no more an outward washing with water than is the "purifying unto himself a people for his own possession" by "our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ," in Titus ii, 14, an external act or ceremony. To a New Testament writer the conjunction of the two ideas of "washing of regeneration" and "renewing of the Spirit" would be far more likely to suggest the language and thought of Ezek. xxxvi, 25, 26, than any form or ceremony 1 So, for example, Ellicott, Commentary, on Eph. v, 26 : "The refer ence to baptism is clear and distinct, and the meaning of tovrpdv, laver; indisputable." But the word ?Lovrp6v, is never used in the Septuagint as a translation of the Hebrew word for laver OVS). Again, on Titus iii, 5, he writes: "Less than this cannot be said by a candid interpreter." 52 The New and Living Way. of baptism. As little can we believe that there is any direct reference to the outward rite of baptism in Eph. v, 26, where Christ is said to have "loved the Church, and to have given himself up for her, in order that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the wash ing of the water in the word, that he himself might present to himself the Church glorious, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish." Here it is the Church {if kKKXrfaia), not the individual believer, that is held before the mind. Christ himself does the cleansing and the washing, though, according to John iv, 2, "Jesus himself baptized not." To suppose that Christ's own cleansing and sanctifying of his Church is done by the water of baptism is to magnify an outward ordinance above the word and the Spirit. Those who suppose "the washing of the water" (Eph. v, 26) to refer directly to baptism naturally find great difficulty in determining both the meaning and the connection of the phrase iv prjfian, in the zvord.1 But nothing is clearer than that this pfjfia is God's word (p'rjria ¦&eov) which in chapter vi, 17, is called "the sword of the Spirit:" that is, the mighty instrument with which the Spirit works all cleansing and sanctifying. In chapter i, 13, it is called "the word (Ao'yoc) of the truth, the gospel of your salva tion." This word is the "power of God unto salvation" 1 This is the frank confession of Ellicott in his notes on the passage. But he rejects, as "scarcely probable," that meaning of ev jyii/iaTL which he calls "the ancient and plausible reference to the words used in baptism." It is amazing to find him writing in the same note that the "idea" of sanctifying in the word "is scarcely doctrinally tenable." Cleansing in the Word. 53 (Rom. i, 16), active, sharp, and penetrating (Heb. iv, 12), sanctifying in the truth (John xvii, 17-19). In view of this clear and uniform teaching of the New Testament, the connection of the phrase "in the word" with what precedes it need not seem difficult. Both the sanctifying and the cleansing is wrought in, or by the instrumentality of, the word of truth. This being the fundamental doctrine, the use of the metaphor of cleansing by the washing of water no more points spe cifically to baptism in this connection than does the like metaphor of sprinkling with clean water in the lan guage of Ezek. xxxvi, 25. That the metaphor may suggest the analogy of any kind of external ablution need not be questioned at all. So in Eph. v, 26, there may be, as some maintain, an allusion to the bathing of a bride before marriage.1 But whatever the particu lar source of the metaphor of washing in Eph. v, 26, and Titus iii, 5, the real sanctifying, cleansing, and regenerating in the word and Spirit of God can be no outward washing of the body. No legitimate inference from these texts can warrant the sacramentarian doc trine of "baptismal regeneration," or of the necessity of baptism in order to enter the kingdom of God. Recurring now to the statement in John iii, 5, we inquire after the source and significance of the mystic 1 This was an ancient custom, and the presentation mentioned in verse 27, and the adorning of a bride for her husband in Rev. ,xxi, 2, favor the supposition of such an allusion. But the sacramentarian, who in- sists that Ttmrrpdv must mean laver rather than the washing, and that the reference is to the basin, font, or baptistry rather than to the idea or the act of cleansing, naturally makes more account of the bath tub than the bathing. 54 The New and Living Way. words, "Except one be born of water and Spirit." The concept of birth, generation, a coming into being and life, involves necessarily to some extent the idea of a new creation. It is noteworthy that in A new creation. . ... the Pauline epistles this new spiritual life which a Christian believer receives from God through faith is called a new creation (/caivr) uriotg). In Gal. vi, 15, he exalts this ideal above carnal ordi nances by saying that "neither circumcision is any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature." In 2 Cor. v, 17, he says that "if any man is in Christ, he is (or there is) a new creature ; the old things are passed away ; behold, they are become new." In Eph. ii, 10, we read : "We are his workmanship (tom/jimi), created in Christ Jesus for good works ;" and in iv, 23, 24, we have the exhortation to "be renewed in the spirit of your mind, and put on the new man, which after God hath been created in righteousness and holiness of truth." So again in Col. iii, 9, 10, the constant putting away of all kinds of sinfulness is based upon the con sideration "that ye have put off the old man with his doings, and have put on the new man, who is being renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him."1 In all these passages the result of the mighty working of God in the soul of man, whereby one is brought from the death of sin into the life of 1 "The new creation of the spirit into fullness of knowledge and truth is regarded by the apostle as analogous to man's first creation. As he was then made in the image of God, so now; but it was then naturally, now spiritually in eniyvuatc ... It is not to restore the old, but to create the new, that redemption has been brought about." — Alford, Greek Testament, notes in loco. The New Creation. 55 righteousness, is conceived as a new creation.1 It is, accordingly, most natural to associate this idea of cre ation with being "born of God." It may be that the truest, clearest concept of creation in the highest sense is that of a begetting, a genesis, and to understand the real import of John iii, 5, we should recognize in the mystic and -metaphorical language of Jesus an allusion to the primeval creation as read in the first chapter of Genesis. There we have the picture of a series of creative acts set forth as a succession of births pro duced by the word of God, and they are called "genera tion of the heavens and the earth." At the beginning "darkness was upon the face of the deep and the Spirit of God was brooding upon the face of the waters." And when "God said, Let there be light ; and there was light," we get our first and sublimest concept of a divine creative birth kl- vdarog ical irvevfiarog, from water and Spirit. As in that primeval creation light came forth out of the darkness by the word of God, begotten as it were from the waters and the Spirit that brooded over them, so the new life and light of God are brought forth in the heart of man by the working of the same Spirit from above. The "being born of water," therefore, in John iii, 5, is not the ceremony of baptism, but a mystic allusion to the brooding of the Spirit over the waters and the breaking of the light out of the "darkness that was upon the face of the 1 So in fact many interpreters translate the word kt'icic, which may mean either creature or creation. According to Schottgen, Horae Hebraicae, vol. i, pp. 328, 704, the proselyte who was converted from idolatry to Judaism was called ftffllrl !TP1Si » new creation. 56 The New and Living Way. deep." This seems to have been the thought of Paul when he says that "God, who said, Light shall shine out of the darkness, shined in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ" (2 Cor. iv, 6). Here we have a true concept of the new birth and the new creation in Christ Jesus. Such generation, or regeneration, is necessarily a work of God in man. It is the gracious product of the life of the Spirit from above (dvuftev). Conviction of sin, repentance, and faith are essential conditions of this transition into heavenly life, and in all these condi tions the human soul cooperates with the life-giving Spirit ; and so we read in John i, 12, 13 : "As many as received him, to them gave he power (kijovoiav, author ity, right) to become children of God, even to them that believe on his name : who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God." The mystery of this new birth is recognized in John Mystery of spirit, »>» 8> and compared to the wind1 which uaiiife. blows where it will, and makes itself heard, but no one knows whence it comes nor whither 1 Bengel (Gnomon of the New Testament, in loco) does not allow the meaning of wind to to irvEVfia in this verse, but translates: "The Spirit breatheth where it will, and thou hearest its voice, but knowest not ¦whence it comes and whither it goes; so is every one who is born of the Spirit." The Sinaitic MS. reads in the last sentence: "So is every one who is born of water and Spirit." The fact that •Kvebp.a is used, like the Hebrew f"n*% both for wind and spirit, occasions ambiguity. The illustration drawn from the mystery of the wind may have been suggested by Gen. i, 2: "The Spirit of God brooded upon the face of the waters," where some render QiflblK WO 0 wind of God. Comp. Gen. viii, 1. New Life from Above. 57 it goes. There is mystery connected with "that which is born of the flesh," as such scriptures as Eccles. xi, 5, and Psa. cxxxix, 14, 15, confess; much deeper the mystery of spiritual and heavenly things. This much, however, seems to be beyond contradiction, that in all the world of living things no form or kind of life is known to come into existence except as the outgrowth of some antecedent germ of life. No changing of sub stances, no modifications of environment, no chemical compounds, no forces of electricity or of any kind of energy known to man, can endow one atom of the material world with the principle of life. And so we may say of any form of inanimate matter in the world, Except some germ of life be imparted to it from above, that is, from some higher power or nature having life in itself, it cannot enter the realm of life at all.1 In accordance with this analogy, so invariable and univer sal in the world of nature, there can come no spiritual element of life in man, who is "dead in trespasses and in sins," except it be given him from above. There must be some living germ implanted by a power not ourselves, and it must be nourished by appropriate con ditions. The Spirit of God, brooding over the great deep of man's elementary possibilities, quickens his spiritual nature into heavenly life and light, and re leases him from the darkness of sin. Thus, to use the metaphor drawn from the first creation, he is "born of water and Spirit," he is "called out of darkness into 1 See Henry Drummond's suggestive chapter on "Biogenesis" in his Natural Law in the Spiritual World, pp. 61-94. New York, 1887. 58 The New and Living Way, marvelous light" (i Pet. ii, 9) ; he has put off the old man of sin, with the fleshly lusts and passions of the depraved nature, and has become a new creation by power from on high. There is chaos no longer in his soul, but peace with God through Jesus Christ. He is now dead unto sin, but alive unto God (Rom. vi, 2, 10, 11). The germ of new and heavenly life abides and develops into the eternal life of God. And so we read in 1 John iii, 9 : "Whosoever is begotten of God doeth no sin, because his seed (ompfia avrov; that is, God's seed, an element of the divine nature as a creative germ of new and higher life) abideth in him." This idea of being born or begotten of God, and thereby becoming separate from sin, is peculiarly Johannine (comp. 1 John ii, 29; iv, 7; v, 1, 4, 18). But it is deeply rooted in the language of 2 Pet. i, 4: "Ye may become par takers of the divine nature, having escaped from the corruption that is in the world by lust." It is involved in such Pauline expressions as "newness of life" (Rom. vi, 4) ; "the Spirit giveth life" (2 Cor. iii, 6) ; "it is no longer I that live, but Christ liveth in me" (Gal. ii, 20) ; "your life is hid with Christ in God" (Col. iii, 3). In fact the doctrine of divine life be gotten in the heart of man by the Spirit of God is so common to all the New Testament writers that it seems needless to point out incidental and favorite forms of expression peculiar to any one author. The new birth, then, is a passing out of darkness into light, and "out of death into life" (John v, 24; 1 John iii, 14). This transition is necessary for en- Life in Christ. 59 trance into the kingdom of God. Heirs of God and partakers of the inheritance of the saints Passlng out of in light must be begotten of God, born deatn int0 life- from above. In language peculiar to John, "the wit ness is this, that God gave us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He that hath the Son hath the life ; and he that hath not the Son hath not the life" (1 John v, 11, 12). While, therefore, all men by reason of their religious constitution and personality are "offspring of God" {yivog tov deov, Acts xvii, 28, 29), no one of these off spring enters into conscious and happy fellowship with God except he be "born from above." There is a new and special impartation of heavenly life, given upon conditions of contrition and turning unto God in faith. This new birth quickens all the spiritual possibilities within man's nature, and, in the mystic Pauline phrase, his life becomes hidden with Christ in God.1 1 The simple facts, sufficiently recognized in the Scriptures, of man's religious nature and possibilities, would seem to leave no ground for the controversies which have been raised over the bearing of the doc trine of regeneration on the universal fatherhood of God. The terms employed, such as regeneration, justification, a new creation, passing out of death into life, contain an obvious figurative element, but describe facts of experience. But no new person is created by this heavenly change. It is the same individual whose conversion is as life from the dead. It is a prodigal son, who forfeited his right to be called a son, and who made himself a child of the devil, selling himself to work un godliness, that is restored to his father's love, dead but alive again, lost but at length found again; and the witness of his real sonship is of the nature of an adoption, because he had become an alien by his wicked works. So one may say after the manner of Paul in i Tim. iv, 10, that God is the Father of all men, especially of them that believe. 6o The New and Living Way. CHAPTER VI. SONSHIP, ADOPTION, ASSURANCE, AND SPIRITUAL, FREEDOM. Before passing on to consider the further develop ment of this new life of God in man, we should make „i„*.™ note, at this point, of the New Testa- A ne w relation- > ^ ' sMp- ment teaching on the subject of the real relationship which such newborn children of God sus tain to him. This heavenly birth, which is conceived as a new creation, is an introduction to something more than natural creaturehood. It is not a relationship which can be propagated from parent to child. It is designated in several Pauline epistles by the word adoption, vlo&eala, so that it is conceived as a con stituted, not a natural, sonship (a son by #s