¦. .'AV-:: n •'¦':''¦: ; .. j" ~~ "Igivethtp£aol<5 ^ 0 •l^LIE«¥M¥IEI&Sirinr- Anonymous Gift THE DIVINE HUMAN INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD; SOME THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. A MEMBER OF THE NEW-YORK BAR. NEW YORK: ANSON D. F. RANDOLPH & COMPANY, 770, Broadway. 1S69. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 18S9, by ANSON D. r. RANDOLPH AND COMPANY, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. CAMBRIDGE : PRESS OF JOHN WILSON AND SON. APOLOGETIC. ' I "HE following suggestions are offered by a -1- layman, upon Inspiration and Atonement, — two topics which, above all others, are now uppermost in the popular mind, and drawing to themselves the keenest popular interest. If it be asked, What does a layman know of these mat ters? it may be answered, first, that dogmatic theology is a dead lion, whose roar has lost its terror as well as its authority. We, the laity, are a thousand to one of our theologic leaders ; and it is full as important that the one should know what the thousand think, as that they should know what the one thinks. And, again, if the suggestions are crude, they may still contain enough of truth and gospel to lift dogmatic and polemic theology out of the ruts in which it has run since scholasticism built our creeds and misinterpreted the New Testament. Systematic divinity has so many decayed pins in its structure, that the tokens of a general dry rot are apparent IV APOLOGETIC. from the lean and totter of every part, as it sways and creaks in the winds of inquiry. No work but Christ's can survive the keen search of modern criticism ; and what that work was and is, is not to be learned from authority and dogmatism of man. Orthodoxy must establish its affirmations at every step ; and all resort to church creeds and symbols will be taken as an evidence of weak ness, and conscious inability by intrinsic argu ment to defend its bulwarks from demolition. It is no longer recommendatory of a dogma, that it is contrary to human reason, and abases human pride : it must have intrinsic worth and unques tioned authority, and make humanity wiser, bet ter, holier, in all thought and speech and deed. It is needless to sa}^ that these suggestions are fragmentary, and do not aspire to that perfect logical construction which the subject admits of from abler hands. The desire of the writer is, that Christianity may secure a wider sway, and more lasting tri umphs, by being placed upon her true founda tions, upon which only she can rest, when the blasts of scientific infidelity are howling around her. CONTENTS OF ESSAY I. CHAPTER I. Science has routed superstition, but may grow too daring, making God impersonal. Personality of God proved from intelligence, creation, fatherhood, providence. Personality implies government, law, and a spiritual system 3 CHAPTER II. Spiritual laws revealed within man, or from without; no perfect law in man. Naturalism a failure. Crea tion of man necessitates a moral law; may operate through second causes ; must come ab extra. We have a book revelation ; what it claims, — written by inspired men. What is inspiration? How did God speak to men? — vision, dream, voice, trance, angel. Is an inspired man always infallible ? 10 CHAPTER III. Human judgment determines which books canonical. Three theories of inspiration: 1. Man conduit-pipe; 2. Exaltation and divine guidance; 3. Genius. No theory dogmatically settled. Barnes, Willson, Arnold, Coleridge, Robertson. Do the Scriptures contain God's message, or is every letter infallible? Romish dogma of infallibility 22 VI CONTENTS. CHAPTER IV. Is exalted genius inspiration? It is, but not in Bible sense ; not equal to Hebrew literature or Christian art; disbelievers in miracles exalt human genius. Have the naturalists exhausted nature? Modesty of scientific dogmatism! Virgil's Pythoness 29 CHAPTER V. Revelation from God proved by, — 1. Unity of plan and aim; Jew did not see it; 2. By its wisdom and good ness ; grandeur of Revelation, not only in subject, but handling, ¦ — Psalms, Job ; 3. A living reformatory power accompanied by a living spirit ; 4. Has elements of cohesion and continuity. Why does philosophy re ject the spiritual sense? 36 CHAPTER VI. Is there a " human element " in Scripture? its admission supposed dangerous. Who determined which books are inspired? and when? and upon what evidence, in ternal or historical? Who excluded Apocrypha and twenty-four Patristic Epistles and Gospels? Council of Trent adopted the first. Books gathered by fallible men. No estoppel by "stare decisis." The " Church " questionable authority. Prophecy always inspired. . 49 CHAPTER VII. Inspiration of Old Testament not proved by New; Christ's teachings on this point; apostles mistaken in facts; different verbal relation of same events disproves verbal inspiration, — instances : harmonies of Gospels; CONTENTS. vii synoptic Gospels taken from "memoirs" now lost; opinion of Bishop Home, Robertson, Coleridge ; apos tles no more infallible in writing than in speech ; Peter and Paul differ 60 CHAPTER VIII. Science discloses verbal errors in record; chronology un certain; the immense numbers of Old Testament unre liable; ancient Hebrew written in short-hand, — liabil ity to error in transcription ; timid Christians fear to own the truth. Objections : 1. It may unsettle faith, — old objection to correct interpretation; 2. Cannot separate human from divine element, — cannot do it in Christ; 3. Tends to rationalism, — abuse of this phrase 71 CHAPTER IX. Other difficulties of the verbal and plenary theory ; not an article of the early church ; diversities of style; trans lations; spiritualizing and fanciful glosses. God in spired the man. Prophecy and supernatural facts prove it. Bible discloses a perfect " spiritual system," — finds us. Spiritual appropriates spiritual. Sym bolic Psalms not true as fact, yet wholly divine in spiritual significance; nineteenth Psalm spiritually true, yet scientifically false. Historic facts separable from ethical spirit. Bible not free from mysteries, but will stand as God's revelation for ever; its- great mis sion to re-create man in Christ's image 85 THE DIVINE-HUMAN INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. THE DIVINE-HUMAN INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. CHAPTER I. TT is one of our hopefulest signs, that society has outgrown many of the follies and super stitions of its childish and unscientific ages ; for childhood in nations, as in persons, is greedy of marvels, is easily dominated by the imagina tion, and corrected only by the slow and often painful processes of experience and wisdom. The fairy, the bogle, the elf, the hobgoblin, the witch, the demon, — these assume a "local habitation and a name," and are installed as veritable per sonages in the Pantheon which the untaught imagination creates ; and this imaginative and believing faculty, so quick and susceptible, so fully the child of poetry and dreams, — this has been selected in all ages as the arena where the forces of the unseen world have been ar- 4 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE rayed to alarm and capture the soul, and hold it a slave to its vile and infamous distortions. And how large a portion of popular literature, poetry, and preaching, has gone to swell this tide of mis- creations, and give to the youthful mind a false and evil bias, which all the learning, philosophy, and correction of riper age, is never able wholly to overcome ! Would to God that our religious culture had been free from this vice ! but this has been far otherwise. The religious element is that which has received most vigorous assailment, and been subj'ected through all past ages to the manipulations of ghostly imposition and craft. On this field, Superstition has builded her loftiest temples, and her most impregnable fortresses, — over all this area which the imagination peoples with the agents, elements, and forces of the Un seen. On the plane of scientific experiment, assertion meets with disproof or verification ; we can handle it, test it, know of what it is made, and how far it can be trusted : but into this shad owy land, into which Imagination and Faith only enter, where Reason is hardly permitted to peer in at the door, neither the law nor the order of the realm admits of examination or distrust. The critical spirit carries a spell that exorcises the INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 5 whole race of "' airy nothings," and brings other forces than the imaginative to act upon the beliefs and conduct of life. In unscientific and uncrit ical ages, men lose all sight of the agency of second causes. Natural laws and forces beiner unknown, in their existence and operation alike, their workings were attributed to the immediate interference and agency of the gods, of supernal or infernal powers ; who brought about an eclipse, sent warning portents in flood and fire and shoot ing-star, guided the pestilence, gave victory to the army, presided over the birth and death of the race, and imparted charms and incantations to their favorites. All this, and much more, of imposture, ignorance, sorcery, and witchcraft, is left behind among the discarded dreams of child hood, or is only nursed in the benighted dens where superstition still holds her orgies, and weaves her necromantic spells for the gain which Fraud extorts from Credulity. But even the critical spirit may become wild with its triumphs ; and, in its exultation over past victories, may aim to sweep the supernatural (and so God) from the universe ; annihilating the per sonality of a First Cause, and enthroning second causes in his place, giving to these a blind power 6 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE and energy to work out results in the departments of matter and of mind which tax no intelligence and admit of no choice ; and so Fate is God ! and inevitable causation, the law of material and spiritual action alike. We ask, then, first, Is there a personal God, — Creator and Upholder of all that is seen and known? Is this universal idea a myth of infant humanity, which its maturer wisdom may discard? With many naturalists, it is the fashion to admit the being of a God, coupled with the idea that he is impersonal ; is the universe, — or its spirit, like life; its motive force or law, like gravitation ; that the universe is formed and works on the principle of blind harmonics, of elective and interpenetrative forces, that spring and play into each other at the appro priate juncture for securing the results that occur ; like the nicely adjusted machinery of a perfect manufactory, where the wheel turns, and the crank works, and the pulley lifts, and the shut tle flies, and the fabric unrolls, as the iron fingers grasp their work, beautiful in finish and texture, the result of it all. But the grand question recurs unanswered, — Who made the wheel, and in vented and adjusted the machinery? It is the result of intelligence, infinite intelligence. But INCARNA TE AND WRITTEN WORD. 7 how is there intelligence without personality? Thought, calculation, judgment, invention, adap tation of means to ends, — these in finite minds argue personality, and why not of the supreme and infinite mind? But they cannot be conceived of as attributes of an impersonal God. More over, the fatherhood of God, so universally admitted as to be almost intuitive, implies person ality, interest, thought, feeling, affection. Denude God of all these personal traits, and he is no more to man than the mist of the mountain-side, which the morning sunbeam drinks up in an hour, — the shadow of a shade, centring in himself no reverence, no love, no homage, no devotion. Man, in his joy or agony, may indulge in lofty rhapsodies to the spirit of the universe, the stars, the ocean, the earth ; but with no Father Al mighty who holds him, and cares for him, he floats a waif on the sea of events, abandoned to the orphanage of Nature, that hears no human cry, and gives back no heavenly sympathy ! Looking back into the past eternities, we gather the evidences of creations at periods so remote that the imagination staggers at the weight of their calculation ; and yet the line is clear be tween when they were not, and when they were. 8 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE When did animal and human life blossom out of this tree of nature, irrespective of God, in a per sonal and supernatural outgoing of divine energy ? Who impressed upon matter its peculiar properties and laws? Who set agoing the forces that play, without clash or interruption, from central suns, that light and warm, and hold in gravitating grasp their planetary families, to the wandering comet, and star-dust of the heavens, — elaborating new worlds in the great womb of Nature. Who could foresee all changes, anticipate and provide for all contingencies, and uphold with a providential su pervision the universe he had formed, but a per sonal Deity? The eternity of matter, in existent forms and properties, is a marvel no sane mind can for a moment credit. It were a miracle be yond all miracles ever thought of. But person ality in Deity, and the creation of man with moral forces and susceptibilities, imply government, and government carries law in its right hand ; and thus a spiritual order and system are the inevitable correlates. Matter can no more exist without gravitation than spirit without its laws and condi tions, which bind it in harmonious action and relation to God, and all associated beings that people the spaces of his spiritual empire ; and INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 9 hence we come at once into the precise moral system which revelation unfolds, the only one which reason approves when most enlightened by the culture which the world has thus far dis closed. IO THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE CHAPTER II. TF, then, spiritual and moral laws exist for man, they must be revealed in one of two modes, — either in man, or out of him. He must either be a law unto himself, following the lead of pas sion and appetite, — which have been discovered by experience to contravene the law of his better nature, bringing him into perpetual collision with beings of like passions and propensities, — or he must seek this law out of himself, in some dis closure which God would be likely to make to beings endowed with reason and the power of choice. Matter makes no mistakes, and is inca pable of violating the law of its nature ; there is no conflict, because there is no freedom : but spiritual beings carry no such law, and cannot in the nature of things. The sages of antiquity, the deep thinkers of old, felt after this law, and found it not, and divined that it must one day come. Many of Plato's speculations upon immortality, and the necessity and substance of a divine com- INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. II munication to man, were anticipative of Christian ity, — the yearnings of enlightened reason after the dawn which, it felt, must break, to satisfy the cravings of its spiritual vision ; and the early Fathers refer triumphantly to these views, in proof of the fact of divine revelation. And so, when positive law actually came, its obligation was affirmed through moral reason, which instantly approved of its supreme ends, which demanded the choice of good, the exercise of all volitions required to attain it ; and so the law became its own witness to beings subject to moral govern ment.* How could Deity reveal this law? Not through matter, and the agencies of matter. The dis closures of nature never rise above nature, discover no law higher than themselves ; and hence the mere naturalist is little wiser than his predecessor, — a few more facts, a little higher and wider gen eralization, a few more occult principles brought to light. Nor is the idea that God governs the universe through the agency of laws, or second causes, at all inconsistent with the idea of his personality, which is as much concerned in the * See Hopkins's Law of Love, p. 89. 12 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE maintenance and integrity of these laws, as if he acted fortuitously, and not uniformly. His love, wisdom, power, providence, stand forth as con spicuously in the reign of law, through which that love, wisdom, power, and providence have their manifestation, as in any conceivable effort of supernatural interference. Is the love of a father any better shown in fitful, occasional, and spas modic bestowments, than in setting on foot a chain of agencies, preconcerted to develop un erringly the same fruits of beneficence, according to rules which are never relaxed and suffer no violation? and so God's fatherhood is better than man's. Still, the laws or rules of our spiritual economy must be revealed, not discovered. The idea of an unselfish and subordinated will to an enlightened reason and conscience, joined to the tenderest feelings, and harmonizing with a uni versal love, never sprang from the soil of natural religion. It may dimly suggest the idea of a lofty moral code, but cannot develop it, because the main element of its power is wanting ; to wit, exemplification. It must see God in Christ, and the law embodied in phenomenal manifestation. This is the key that unlocks the golden gate of heaven, and sets man forward on his pathway to INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 13 the skies. The integrity of moral law needs en forcement and vindication, as well as disclosure, from a higher plane than the natural and sensuous. Its intent, both as to precept and .penalty, must be seen linked, not to an impersonal rule of con venience, but to the august authority of a personal God, who delegates no subordinate power to justice or other impersonal attribute, but himself is there to enforce, in conscious execution and unerringly, every jot and tittle of his irrepealable mandates. We have, therefore, a revelation of God in nature and providence, in conscience and in his tory : these are the groundwork of our natural theology, — that which Socrates and Plato, Seneca and Cicero, saw and practised. But, above all, we have a book revelation ; and our deepest prob lem is to solve what it is, and what it teaches. Is this also from God? Is it improbable that he would disclose his will in this manner? Should not the Almighty Spirit give to the human and fallible spirit, in some form, that which accords with its necessities, and supplies the deficiencies which the teachings of nature exhibit? "Human ity feels after God if haply it may find him." Shall he not then appear, to vindicate the rectitude 14 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE of his moral administration, and lead man by a way he had not known ; will he not furnish light in his darkness, joy for his sorrow, hope for his despair, strength for his weakness, and spiritual aids where all other and inferior helps are power less and unavailing? He has revealed himself on the plane of the natural : why shall he not do it, on that of the spiritual? Completeness and adaptation here are as imperative as in the department of natural and material forces. This book revelation, accordingly, purports in its sixty-six separate histories, laws, prophecies, psalms, messages, biographies, types, symbols, — in its principles and doctrines, — to be essen tially the disclosure of God's dealings, purposes, laws, and intentions, as to the race, with the re demptive economy by and through which man may become Godlike, and meet to be partaker of the celestial inheritance, out of which he has lapsed and fallen by reason of his sin. We waive all discussion now, as to the integrity of the books of the sacred canon, — which are genuine and which apocryphal. The church has not been in entire agreement on this ; and, taking up our English Protestant Bible, we reverently ask, Is this the true and veritable Word of God to INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 15 us? How did he communicate it to men ? When, where, in what manner, by what process? The record was made by human fingers ; how were they guided by the divine mind? Is it a revela tion? what is revelation ? Is it inspired? what is inspiration? Is it infallible? How much, and what portions, are human, and what divine? These are serious and reasonable inquiries, when the bliss of eternity hangs on the result. They may be asked : they should be answered as far as possible, if answer can be found. 1 . What do the books themselves claim ? It is not known, except traditionally, who wrote many of the books of the Old Testament ; there is less un certainty as to those of the New. The Pentateuch is ascribed to Moses ; and by some, the book of Job : but this is more than doubtful. In portions of these Scriptures it is said, "God spake all these words ;" and in other portions nothing is claimed, as to any divine authority, but the record pro ceeds with its annals or biography, like other writings of antiquity, which purport to contain what any historiographer might learn and write without special or divine aid. Very large por tions of the history of the Jews, — during the theocracy, under their judges, prophets, kings ; 1 6 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE their glory, prosperity, renown, conquest, cap tivity, exile, return; their rites and ceremonies, their peculiar religious and social economy, — all these seem to be related with the fidelity of or dinary history or tradition, and preserved with peculiar care by that jealous and exclusive people. It is claimed in the record, that God wrote the ten commandments on tables of stone, as there given ; and so, also, that God commanded Moses to speak thus and so to his people ; that God spake to Moses face to face, as a man talketh with man, — and yet that, when Moses desired to see his glory, he hid him in the cleft of the rock, as no man could see his face and live, it being else where also affirmed that " no man hath seen God at any time." It recurs, therefore, How did he reveal himself in the earlier ages according to the record? Until the fifteenth chapter of Genesis, the language is, "And God said" unto Adam, Eve, Cain, Noah ; " The Lord said " to Abraham, &c. After that, " The word of the Lord came to Abram in a vision," — not such a "vision," how ever, as suspended his faculties, for he conversed and argued with this " word of the Lord " in this vision ; and next, the " angel of the Lord " found Hagar by a fountain, and sent her home to her INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 17 mistress, with predictions of Ishmael's greatness, as the " Word of the Lord " had predicted the fate of Abraham's seed, when as yet he was childless. And so, "three men" appeared to Abram, and talked with him. Two of them, as angels, went to Lot ; and " the Lord " showed to Abram what he was about to do to Sodom. Next "God came to Abimelech in a dream." The "angel of the Lord" arrests Abram's hand in slaying Isaac. "The Lord appeared to Jacob in a dream," with the ladder of the ascending and descending an gels, on his way to Haran. "A man "wrestled with Jacob until the breaking day, and he said, I have seen God face to face and live. Joseph interprets Pharaoh's dreams by virtue of the "Spirit of God"' that was in him. So "God" appeared to Moses in the burning bush at Horeb, and talked with him out of the bush ; and after, at Sinai, and from the mercy-seat of the taber nacle, he communed with Moses, though we are told that God conversed with no prophet there after, face to face, as with Moses. These are specimens from the Pentateuch, and are charac teristic of the modes of divine communication recorded in the Old Testament. It was the "Lord," the "Lord God," the "voice," the "an- l8 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE gel," the "vision," the "trance," the "man." It came in converse, in revelation, in inspiration, in prophecy, in moral and ceremonial law, — each and all in the line of miraculous interference when God so communicated, but not claiming that the writer of these histories had any such inspiration in making the record thereof which is left to us. The word inspiration occurs twice in the Scrip tures, — once in the Old Testament and once in the New. "There is a spirit in man," says Elihu (Job, xxxii. 8), "and the inspiration of the Al mighty giveth them understanding ; " but this only affirms the superiority of man to the other orders of the animal creation, in that the inbreathing of God gives him " understanding ; " and this applies to all men, — to the race, — and is in no sense the inspiration of which we are speaking. "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God," is translated, in the Vulgate, by Luther, and a vast majority of Greek scholars, as " all Scrip ture, divinely inspired, is profitable," &c, leaving us uncertain what was meant by " all Scripture," — whether any thing more than the Pentateuch, for which the Jews claimed inspiration by emi nence, the New Testament being no part of the sacred canon, and most of it then unwritten. INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD- 19 What is material in this text is, that there is such a thing as " divine inspiration " in the Scriptures referred to, whatever there may be of the human element also ; and the implication is strong, that what is profitable for correction, and instruction in righteousness, is divinely inspired. So it is said, to the Jew were committed the "oracles of God," meaning that God revealed himself to the Jews ; but what constituted these oracles is not declared. Was it the Pentateuch, the prophets, the psalms, the Apocrypha, or some portions of it? How are we to know? So, too, where it is affirmed, that " aforetime holy men spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost," the allega tion is confined to their speaking, or prophesying as it was then termed, and also to holy men, when it is clear that these prophecies came from unholy men also ; for Saul was once among the prophets; and Balaam, in a trance, having his eyes open, saw the goodly tents of the chosen people, and a Star arise out of Jacob, under the like inspiration, when the Spirit of the Lord came upon him. And so Caiaphas spoke prophetically as to the death of Christ. So Christ promised the gift of the Holy Spirit "to lead his disciples into all truth, and bring all things to their remem- 20 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE brance, which he had said unto them : " alleging at the same time (Luke xxiv. 44), "that all things must be fulfilled which were written in the Law of Moses, in the Prophets, and in the Psalms concerning me." So he quoted from the Psalms' in his temptation, and read from the prophecy of Isaiah in reference to himself, saying, "this day is this Scripture fulfilled in our ears." In respect to the first point, — the divine illumination prom ised to the Apostles, — was this a pledge that the Spirit should so dwell in them as that in thought, speech, and writing, they should be for ever thereafter absolutely infallible? If so, how came Paul and Peter to differ so radically about the necessity or allowance of Jewish ceremonies in the Christian Church at Jerusalem? That they were divinely inspired cannot be doubted ; but how far, and in respect to what communications, we cannot here learn. Paul writes some things where he expressly disclaims divine agency, and some other things where he " thinks " only he has the mind of the Spirit ; and others he affirms by the commandment of the Lord. Is not this the key, after all, to this vexed and insoluble ques tion, — a part divine, a part human, and a part uncertain even to the writer? And no possibility INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 21 of untwisting the threefold cord, — better that it should not be untwisted. Throughout the four Gospels, in their history of Christ, they refer to all the prophetical announcements concerning him, — to his Virgin mother; the place of his birth ; the circumstances of his life, betrayal, crucifixion, and death, — to prove he was the true Messiah, the Shiloh of Jacob ; that he was the personage called wonderful, counsellor, &c. ; and that he was the expected King of the Jewish nation. Still this reference to prophecy did not necessarily carry with it the authentication of every thing written by that prophet, or by all the prophets. There might still be the human and the divine element, side by side, in the record. And the same thing may be affirmed of all other references and quotations of the Hebrew oracles by our Saviour and his apostles. Besides, a refer ence of the Jews to their own Scriptures was peculiarly appropriate, to prove he was the true and expected deliverer. 22 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE CHAPTER III. TF, then, we fail to find, in any one of the sixty- six books called canonical, the claim of a divine infallibility for every utterance ; if the translation, admission into the canon of Scrip ture, binding up with the remaining books, be the work of human judgment and human hands ; if no inspiration is claimed, in judging what writ ings shall be admitted, and what rejected ; if no inspiration be claimed for translator, — on what authority rests the assumption of the verbal and plenary infallibility of every letter and line, of every comma, colon, and period, of the books bound together, but originally separate works, called the Book, or Bible? Before examining the arguments which are supposed to prove this plenary theory, let us de fine more accurately what is meant by inspiration, and make some references to the opinions of our ablest divines, to show how far this is a settled question in the Church. INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 23 1. There is a theory, that man was used as a conduit-pipe, or organ, through whom God com municated with man, — the mind passive, acting simply under the mechanical influence of the Holy Spirit, not speaking or writing its own thoughts or words, but the thoughts and words dictated by the Spirit ; that the message is there fore as direct from God as if he spake in an audi ble voice, or wrote with his own divine finger, and any other than human agency had been se lected. And this carries with it, as a conse quence, that each book, so inspired, is verbally infallible ; has been miraculously preserved, trans lated, and admitted into the canon : for what would the plenary inspiration avail, if human fallibility has excluded such book from the canon, as the Romanist claims in respect to the Apoc rypha. 2. A second theory is, that the Spirit so quick ened, elevated, enlarged, and opened the eye of the human soul, that its disclosures of spiritual and moral truths were infallible, while the writer was left, in other respects, to his own learning and judgment, and to color his narrative with the opinions and historical notions of his age ; that, in respect to all prophetical announcements, they 24 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE were delivered as received, the writers not know ing, often, "what, or what manner of thing, the Spirit that was in them did signify." 3. A third theory supposes the mind of the speaker or writer, acting altogether freely, speak ing entirely its own thoughts and words, but deriving, from divine communication and enlight enment, a higher tone, a correcter judgment, and, from a deep insight, competent to speak of spiritual things. The first theory claims infallibility in all things ; for it is God, and not man, that speaks. And if science and fact are in conflict with the record, all the worse for science and fact : the word must stand if the heavens fall. The second theory admits the existence of the human and divine elements, — the fallible and infallible : the thus saith the Lord, and thus saith the writer ; the history, as he carefully gathered it from the floating traditions and genealogies of his people, selected from conflicting records, and the lofty lyric sweeping out on the fiery pinions of prophetic inspiration, and revelling, by antici pation, in the consummation of glorious things, yet to be accomplished in the latter days. The third theory — defended more especially INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 25 by the French and German schools, which wholly exclude the miraculous — holds that all great and magnificent endeavor and achievement, — the works of prophet, poet, orator, — of Shakspeare, Isaiah, Milton and David, Ezekiel and Goethe, Byron and Malachi, Bacon and Moses, — are in the same sense inspired ; the truth in them infal lible so far as true, and in no sense a divine, supernatural revelation. Of course there can be no prophecy, except the forecast of a wise pre science ; and the Scriptures, which sparkle all over with this lore, are in that respect mythical and vain. How far these theories are so settled as to be withdrawn from further debate, we will now pro ceed to consider. Albert Barnes says, in his seventh lecture on the Ely foundation, — "There is no more inviting field on which a student of the sacred scriptures who would wish to prepare something that might be the great work of his life could more properly employ his talents, than in endeavoring to deter mine the yet unsettled questions about the inspira tion of the Bible ; into the questions about the mode of inspiration, — whether it extends to the words as well as to the matter ; how far the sacred 26 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE writers availed themselves of their own knowledge and observation, and the knowledge and historical records in existence, when they wrote ; how far, as inspired men, they are responsible for state ments on other subjects than those pertaining to the immediate purpose of inspiration, the ordinary facts of history, or the statements of science ; how far they were permitted to employ their own pow ers, and how this is consistent with their being inspired ; how the apparent discrepancies and con tradictions are to be reconciled with the idea of inspiration, — these are difficult points which have not yet been met, and which, perhaps, none of us are prepared to meet." And, again, p. 237, — "What is inspiration at all? What is plenary in spiration? Is it suggestion or superintendence or control, or all combined? How far are the faculties of men employed ? Were they kept from error on all subjects ! How can the dates, gene alogies, and apparent inconsistencies and contra dictions, be reconciled with the proper idea of inspiration ? These are questions yet to be solved ; and happy will be the man that shall be raised up to solve them." And behind this ripe biblical scholar and critic, whose works are in all our homes and hands, stand an illustrious array of INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 27 Christian scholars, of equal learning and ability, who have held the same language, and enter tained the same views. Arnold, Coleridge, Rob ertson, Neander, Bayne, Schleiermacher, De Wette, — men of deep piety and rare attainments, who, although not agreeing^ perhaps, on any posi tive theory, if a positive theory be possible, are yet of one mind in respect to the unsettled state of this question in the creeds of Christendom. Do the books of the Bible together contain the system of religion revealed by God? or are these several books infallible authority in every utter ance they give forth? These are the momentous questions as yet unsettled, and which throw their shadows, from these shores of time, afar upon the deep abysses of eternity. Says Dr. Will- son, in his article on the Anglican Church, — :'The Word of God' is a phrase which begs many a question when applied to the canonical books of the Old and New Testaments, — a phrase never applied to them by any scriptural authors : our articles have no declaration, that the Bible throughout was supernaturally suggested ; nor what portions of it were owing to special divine illumination ; nor the slightest attempt at defining inspiration, whether mediate or immediate, wheth- 28 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE er through or beside or overruling the natural faculties ; nor the least hint of the relation between the divine and human elements in the composition of the books." One may hold either of these views without infringing the symbols of the Church. Our churches mostly hold, that the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament con stitute (or contain) an inspired, infallible rule of faith and practice : but it is not asserted that they contain nothing more ; for they evidently contain a vast variety of matters, neither practical nor addressed to faith. To look no further, then, we are not bound to defer examination, and put an estoppel upon criticism, because we are committed to any foregone dogmatic statement which it is moral treason and impiety to question. The Romanist bows consistently to the authority of the Church in this particular, which insists rather upon her own infallibility than upon that of the canonical writings. But Protestants are bound "to give a reason for the hope that is in them with meekness and fear," and to avoid no exam ination from a secret dread that it may prove un satisfactory or disastrous. We can afford to stand by the Truth, wherever it may lead us. INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD- 29 CHAPTER IV. "XT 7E turn, then, to the third theory named in the order, and inquire, whether inspiration is synonymous only with exalted genius. We say, popularly and loosely, of some one exhibiting commanding powers at a great juncture of af fairs, — in the field of thought or action, or both ; the poet, the orator, the statesman, the divine, — he was inspired ; he was an incarnate splendor, — thought in effulgence, genius on fire; his thought and deed were superhuman. Napoleon at Lodi,' Shakspeare in Hamlet, Webster reply ing to Hayne, Lincoln killing slavery with his pen, — these are the mountain peaks of human endeavor, the grand altitudes to which humanity, in rare instances, bounds through the buoyant helpfulness of a divine afflatus. They know not how it comes, but every faculty and function is alive with quick and spontaneous energy ; and, instead of being goaded to its task, carries the man, as on royal pinions, to heights where the 30 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE foot hath not trod, nor the eye of the eagle looked, — the soul dominant, and swaying with lordly power every energy of the man ; the brain lumin ous ; the judgment clear ; the memory quick and accurate ; the mind crystallizing upon combina tions with intuitive precision and lightning velo city. And this, it may be admitted, was the inspiration of God. It has its field and its func tion on the plane of human endeavor. It is a divine stimulus that lifts the human into the range of those achievements which make epochs in the history of nations, and in the mutations of time. But is this all that is meant where it is said, " the Spirit of the Lord came upon him"? Where, in all classical literature, do you find the counterpart to the rapt visions of Isaiah and Ezekiel, to the unearthly grandeur of Job, to the lofty lyrics of David and Asaph, to the dedicatory prayer of Solomon, to the sweet ethics of the sermon on the mount? What inspiration so sublime as that of the Hebrew muse, which has outlived all dynas ties, survived all changes in literature and art, is as fresh to the devout heart to-day as when, with undazzled eye and wings tipped with fire, she first rose refulgent over the harp-strings of the sweet singer of Israel, never to fold them INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 31 more until the music of her strain shall be wafted from the outmost verge of God's empire into that seat of glory where his majesty is pavilioned and his holiness abides. Survived all art, did I say? Is she not the creator and fashioner of all that is best, most suggestive, most devout, most truthful, most enduring, in the painting and architecture of the middle and subsequent ages? Can the cold and classical figures or structures of the Greek hold place for an hour with those sublimer crea tions of Michael Angelo and Raphael ; with those harmonious temples where every niche and finial, every pillar and ornament, — the lofty nave, the glorious arch, the glittering pinnacle, and "diadem tower," — are but the notes of one grand anthem of praise petrified into stone, the frozen music of Christian art : to-day, the wonder and inspiration of the nations? But it was so grand, so beautiful, so exalted, because it embodied conceptions which were not of earth, — flashes of supernal beauty, that broke through our cloudy world from higher orbs and loftier imaginations. The inspiration of genius, — aye, indeed, those wondrous suggestions that break in upon the mind, like sunbeams through an opening cloud — that disclosed gravitation to Newton, steam-power to 32 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE Watt, the locomotive to Stephenson, the lightning alphabet to Morse, — that are ab extra, and the "seeds of things," — what a dull and heavy way would humanity travel without them ! How they exalt our common clay, and inject into society its capacity for progress, and its element of change ! The discoverer, the inventor, — the creator of new thoughts, new combinations, new developments in politics, literature, and art, — we build them mon uments and garnish their sepulchres ; and we do well. But humanity — in its larger scope, in its wider possessions, in its healthier progress, in its nobler instincts and loftier aspirings — is at once their meed of praise, and their monument of glory. These are the Chimborazo and Nevada peaks, rising into rarer atmospheres ; crowned with a purer light, — beacon-points of beauty, seen and hailed from afar. The theory, that exalted genius is inspiration, is most tenaciously urged by those who exclude all supernaturalism from the empire of Jehovah ; who disbelieve miracles, and cannot tolerate the thought that the Supreme Being should ever inter fere with the laws and agencies once set agoing by him, if indeed he so constituted things. But are these philosophers quite sure that they have INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 33 penetrated the arcana of Nature deep enough to have read all her secrets, and know the precise boundaries where nature and the supernatural meet, — where the one terminates and the other commences ? Are they such adepts in mental and spiritual psychology ; have they so weighed and measured what is normal and what abnormal in mental manifestation, that they are in no danger of mingling what is sensuous with what is super- sensuous? What do we know of the boundaries of the natural? Centuries agone they were sup posed to have been reached; but, lo ! they widen with every epoch, and recede with every change : they sweep outward with the roll of every star, and inward with the beautiful mystery of every atom. The telescope, the microscope, the layers of the rock and sand, the tombs of vertebrate and invertebrate life ; the boiling lava of to-day and the old red sandstone and granite, with the signet of eternity stamped upon it, • — all proclaim that Nature has many secrets yet to disclose, many wonders yet to display, many realms of her wide outlying empire yet untraversed : and that there may be points and junctures where the finite clasps hands with the infinite ; and Nature opens her bosom, and holds her wondrous 3 34 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE forces, subject to the wisdom and potency of her God. Is this the modesty of Science? When New ton, the greatest discoverer yet known, who de tected the fine wires upon which the universe is hung, — when he confessed himself but as a child, gathering shells on the shore of the great ocean which lay outstretched before him, shall his pygmy imitators of to-day bar out Jehovah from all special interference in the system he has formed, and shut up his omnipotence to the uni form maintenance of an undeviating rule, unless its interruption be first sanctioned by the august judgment of St. Comte, St. Parker, St. Draper, and St. Buckle? Inspiration, then, may come upon man, as well as be generated within him ; — may be a foreign force, as well as an internal elevation ; — may re veal what is new and prophetical, as well as bring past acquisitions into vivid prominence. Scientific infidelity cannot disprove, but only question, it; and prophecy and its fulfilment make it certain. It is certainly allowable, moreover, to recur lo the opinions of the ancients on this subject, where the Scriptures themselves are of no direct INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 35 authority ; their own validity being in question. It was universally held, that their sages, oracles, and priests were subjects of a divine frenzy or ecstasy when under the inspiration of the gods, — they were filled with a knowledge of events to come, and gave their encouragement or warn ing to the devotee. The great Pythoness is thus described in the often-quoted lines of Virgil : — " I feel the god, the rushing god ! she cries. While thus she spoke, enlarged her features grew, Her color changed, her locks dishevelled flew, The heavenly tumult reigns in every part, Pants in her breast, and swells her rising heart; Still spreading to the sight, the priestess glowed, And heaved, impatient of the incumbent god. Then, to her inmost soul by Phcebus fired, In more than human sounds, she spoke inspired." 2,6 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE CHAPTER V. "T)ERHAPS it is full as appropriate under this head, as any other, to urge, that inspiration is higher than genius or frenzy, as proved by what Inspiration has actually done in the books which present her image and superscription to us, stamped with a divine signet. The volume is made up, as we have seen, of sixty-six different books, — by almost as many different authors, various in style, capacity, learning, — scattered through sixteen hundred years of time, from the beginning, as recorded by Moses, to the winding up of the Apocalypse ; and yet there runs through all a unity of plan, a harmony and similarity of moral intention and aim, which make them seem in that sense like the work of one mind. And we find, also, that this unity is, or seems, an undesigned and un conscious unity ; and yet it is so clear and plain and understood by us, that one of the chief ob jections to the book often is, that there are some INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 37 minute and verbal discrepancies between the dif ferent authors ! We expect unity, and are hurt if we are disappointed. But why look for unity, if not inspired by one mind? Homer and Milton and Shakspeare, Longfellow and Bryant, are all poets : bind up their best works together, and then look for the unifying spirit, the common aim, the harmonious development of a great plan, of which these several poems are constitu ent parts, all sweeping to one grand result; and see if we can find it. It is not there, and we would say it was miraculous if it was. But we expect it in these books ; and we find it in these books. Is it any less miraculous, because Moses and David and Isaiah and Paul and John are the poets and historians and moralists, than those we have mentioned? These books are but beads strung upon one spiritual cord, whose ends are linked to the two eternities. They can no more get out of place, than a planet could shoot from its orbit. Christ is the sun, and these the worlds that sweep in harmonious adjustment about him. He is the burden of the elder sage, whose record is luminous with the morning beams of time, — the seed of the woman, — the Shiloh of Jacob, — the Prophet like unto Moses, — Leader and Me- 38 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE diator; he the wonderful counsellor, — the Lamb led to the slaughter, — the Star of Israel, Con queror and King : and so, as these prophetic orbs flash past, they blaze, each with some new and strange feature and reflection of the central power that holds and guides them ; and so we see the elder dispensation opening and preparing for the new, the law becoming a schoolmaster to bring us to Christ. As, in climbing some lofty moun tain, we mark successive stages and reaches of table-land, each spreading itself as a preparation and foundation for higher ranges : so here, there is involved a course of progressive teaching, an orderly development and unfolding, as with un even velocities, but yet progressive throughout; sometimes protracted, interrupted, often languid ; sometimes so dubious as to seem like retrogres sion ; its step, sometimes the step of centuries, yet majestically drawing nearer to the great dis closure. "The root was long in showing tokens of its presence ; the stem and leaves grew slowly : but yesterday the bud emerged from its sheath, and to-day it has expanded into the flower." * And, mark ! this anticipative preparation and progress ; this carrying of the new in the womb * Progress of Doctrine, p. 44. INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 39 of the old, unconsciously ; this efflorescence of Judaism into Christianity, of ritualistic form into spiritual life and power, — is precisely what the Jew never dreamed of, and would never have intentionally consummated. It was an organic development without personal intent ; and no one was more surprised than the unconscious agents through whose labors it was accomplished. And even after Christ had gone home to his Father, how the impregnation of Judaism was manifested even in Peter, and had to be corrected by the broad church polity which Paul inaugurated and established ! True, the ancient system may have been perfect in itself, and adapted to the results it sought ; but, buried in its types and shadows, germinant in its sym bols and ceremonies, lurked the seeds of loftier thoughts and better purposes, which the coming eras, with the sunshine and shower of provi dential unfolding, were to quicken into the world wide principles of universal brotherhood and love : and so the bloody altar of sacrifice was removed from the Court of the Temple, and was builded anew of better material, in the contrite Spirit; and the Shechinah, that blazed between the wings of the cherubim, was removed to the 40 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE holier shrine of the personal Soul ; and the propi tiatory that covered the Israelites' sin, and gave assurance that it was pardoned, was erected anew in the heart and blood of the Great Sacrifice, through whose redemptive economy alone can sin be pardoned and destroyed. Was all this the result of human genius, guided fortuitously to such amazing results? It is of the same character as the fortuitous concourse of atoms creating a world, or a man. Genius is as competent to effect the one as the other. Moreover, this unity of intent and plan is but half the argument. It might have been unific, and yet not wise ; harmoniously strung, and yet not working for good. Yet here we find not only the presence of a common intent, in the widely diversified works of prophets and apostles, but a common scheme on which all are framed, — one which the trial of eighteen hundred years has demonstrated as the best, the wisest, the most effective ever devised for lifting up humanity from its degradation, and giving to it the purpose and power of amendment and purification, — the very " wisdom of God, and the power of God unto sal vation," — vindicated as divine, not simply in its abstract principles, but in its concrete and mani- INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 41 fested accomplishments. It may be further ob served, says Isaac Taylor, that, in the fourteen non-supernatural epistles, — i.e. , those where no miracle is made the basis of their instructions, — "while these writings breathe throughout with an intense fervor, directed toward the one object of securing and promoting personal and social virtue, they do not in a single instance throw the stress of any ethical argument upon the supernatural attestations of the message." The greatest mira cle God ever wrought was in the message itself: it was its own witness, blazing all over, in itself and in its history, with the proofs of self-vindica tion. If human genius alone is capable of pro ducing a literature equal to that of the Bible, why has it not been done? Where is it? Surely the spark should have been lighted ere six thousand years had waxed and waned. These books alone profess to contain divine revelation : did Homer or Shakspeare or Milton make such claim? Are they not loftiest in style, and widest in range, and deepest in spiritual philosophy? and yet how far beneath the tone of Christ's sim ple lessons, or the lyric grandeur of prophet and sacred bard ! Is this superiority owing to the subject on which they respectively treat? Turn 42 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE to Confucius; to the Zenda-Vesta, the Vedas and Shasters of India ; the Koran : they fall far below the style of most of the secular poetry and philosophy of their age. No ! the shepherd boy — rising to the grandeur of a magnificent Oriental prince, and gemming his path all the way from the sheepcote to the throne with strains of penitence or rapture, hung like sacred pictures, that embody the devotion and reverence and joy of all subse quent ages — has no rival and no peer. No ! the lofty drama of Job, with its majestic simplicity of simple suffering, with its stern and manly integrity and vindication of providence, — though the thick hail of God's deepest judgments girt in its sublime pathos by the power of God — "in strange un- Hebrew stories of Eastern astronomic mythology : the old wars of the giants ; the imprisoned Orion ; the wounded dragon ; the glittering fragments of the sea-snake Rahab, trailing across the northern sky ; " the unearthly magnificence of God's voice and message from the whirlwind ; the preter natural, Titanic, and enkindling glory that breaks over its majestic close, — set it apart from all mere human conceptions, and stamp it as inimitable, unapproachable, divine. And here we are en titled to urge, that there is in Revelation a living, INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 43 reformatory, and elevating power, superior to all other moral forces ever promulgated, suited to humanity in every stage of its degradation, and which society could not spare to-day without surging back into barbarism ; which no science could compensate, and no philosophy supply ; which no wisdom of man ever discovered, but which was brought to light by men unskilled in letters, professing to receive it from a higher power, and to communicate it as the message of God. And then mark its effect when it began its practical operation upon the conscience and the heart, — three thousand and five thousand converted in a single day ! What did it mean ? "New wine," said the Pharisaic scoffer. Yes : he unconsciously uttered the sublimest of truths. It was the new wine of God's spiritual vintage. He was treading the press, and watching its flow and effervescence until it should be fitted to be drunk anew with him in his spiritual kingdom. Was the presence and power of the Holy Ghost in the early church the creation of fancy and fanaticism? All history, sacred and profane, attests the astonishing claims that were set up in regard to it, as the wonder-working potency of an unseen God. Was it a natural force, after 44 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE all, — begotten, like the dreams of modern en thusiasm, in the mists of animal excitement, through the occult play of clairvoyant and mag netic forces, that were understood in their effects, but not in their elements and principles? It is separable from this whole class of marvels by one radical distinction, which renders the chasm impassable between them : the work of the Holy Spirit then, now, and always, effected a complete and permanent renovation of moral character and life. These temporary enthusiasms ran high for the moment, but died out directly the exciting cause was removed, and left the heart and char acter arid and barren of all moral and spiritual results, or stimulated only by the malign emotions of arrogance and spiritual pride ; and this will be found true universally, on every repetition of the power of each, to the end of time. Beside, the genuine work of the Spirit had its issue in a self-forgetful personal consecration of property and life ; in world-wide sympathies, in fiery persecutions and heroic martyrdoms, endured and defied for a crown which an earthly ambition would not clutch, and could neither appreciate nor covet. And so this same power had in it elements of cohesion and continuity, which have INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 45 been instrumental in effecting greater changes in political and social life, than all other agencies which the world has ever seen or felt. The unity of race and languages, the brotherhood of man, the wide, underlying principles of order and social law, the power of sympathy and forgive ness of injuries, — all these, ingrafted upon the heart of man by the Holy Ghost, create such an array of facts, in his history, as demand other answers and explanations than a sneer. Beside, the subjects of this influence were the purest, truthfulest, best, wisest, men of their times ; seeking no applause, hunting after no notoriety, goaded into no false raptures : but living lives of all soberness and sincerity, knowing whereof they affirmed, and appealing to the God of the Spirit that dwelt in them. What account does the positive philosophy, that sees only the glitter of genius in these records, give of all this? It is utterly ignored as a fact, or set down to the enthusiasm of sect, or the dreams of delirium ; but is God's truth to be thus dealt with? If inspiration be genius only, how strange that its subjects should oftenest be the very men who manifested genius in nothing else ! What sort of genius had the twelve disciples? Judas had a 46 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE genius for money, perhaps ; but these unlettered peasants, modest and docile, not beyond the fish er's boat and net even after the crucifixion, had no more genius for dreams of elevation, rank, influence, socially or intellectually, than anticipa tions that their assumed successors would one day fish for men, clothed in scarlet and gold, with mitres and tiaras on their foreheads, with kings holding their stirrups, and devout nations pros trate before them. With all their dreaming, they never dreamed of this : they had no genius for such foreshadowings. And let it not be forgotten, that this power of the Holy Ghost to enlighten, chasten, change, comfort, and sustain the soul, is as firmly held to-day in all Christendom as in the hour of its first promulgation. Not a believer in Christ who will not aver, that his conviction of sin and his love of God, his sense of pardon and peace, his hope and joy in this house of his pil grimage, his expectation of future blessedness, — in fine, all his spiritual exercises, — were begotten, cherished, and carried forward by the help and agency of this same good spirit of God ; and this confession comes from a consciousness of the fact, as clear and indubitable as that of his own existence. INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 47 Does a philosophy that refers all phenomena to the senses ignore the spiritual sense? Or, if sensation be the ultimatum, why are the results ascertained by the sight, or the touch, more reli able than those of the moral consciousness, espe cially in a realm where sight and feeling cannot go, and spiritual intuition is sole witness and judge. How insane this conflict between informa tion derived from animal sensations, and those which are spiritual, as if man's nobler part was nothing, and he lived and died as a brute, having a little higher reason, capable of a wider reach of intellect and larger powers of observation, but nothing grander, — no surviving soul, no moral life, no spiritual consciousness of good or evil, no blessed eternity, no God, this spark of life escaping into the great life-reservoir of the uni verse when this fitful fever is over ; and this round of recurring life and death to go on for ever ! Ixion's wheel, turning, turning perpetually, with out purpose or end ! We are confident, then, from the foregoing considerations, that the Bible contains much more than what human genius, or human effort, however frenzied or excited, could put into it. It contains God's messages to man. Does it contain any thing else? 48 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE Is every word, between its covers, the word of God, — infallibly true, without any admixture of human imperfection or alloy ? This point now claims our attention. INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 49 CHAPTER VI. TT is claimed by the advocates of a verbal, literal, plenary inspiration, that the admis sion of a human element in the Bible is fatal to its claims of acceptance and authority as a whole, because no line of discrimination can be drawn between what is of God and what is of man, and therefore each reader's judgment is made ultimate in respect to what he will receive, and what reject ; that the Church has always taught the divine authority of the entire canon, and that the foundations of faith will soon be unsettled if we seriously question it. These reasons, if valid, are weighty and conclusive ; and it therefore behooves the inquirer to step cautiously over this delicate ground, making sure footing as he passes, that he may not land in the sloughs and quag mires of infidelity, or become bewildered in the wilderness of the positive philosophy from which we have sought thus far to rescue him. Let us, first, without irreverence or captiousness, look 4 50 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE some of the difficulties of this theory in the face, and then consider the points above stated in their order. First, then, by what rule of divine discrimina tion do we determine which of all these ancient books presented for our acceptance are of divine authority, or have any divine element in them? The Hebrew nation, at the time of Christ, main tained the divine legation of Moses, and the authority of the Pentateuch as left by him ; while no such claim was made or admitted for the Hagiographia, or the other sacred books. Who collected these books together is not known, or when ; it is usually referred to the times of Ezra, although several of them were written after his day. By whose discrimination were these other books admitted into the sacred canon, with the stamp of inspiration? How comes it that the book of Ruth and Esther, Ecclesiastes, the Songs of Solomon, or even the Psalms, pos sess any divine authority? What authentication even has the Mosaic cosmogony in geologic or astronomic disclosures? How many times is the obvious meaning of that relation to be altered to suit the facts of modern science ? Who excluded the great mass of ancient contemporaneous litera- INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 51 ture and morals from its place beside what was admitted to be genuine? The difficulties here are twofold, external and internal, — one relating to the outward proofs and evidences of their divinity, the other to the dis crepancies and apparent contradictions and im possibilities contained within the books themselves. Our first difficulty lies in determining what, books are to be deemed canonical at all. There are excluded from the canon of the Old Testament fourteen books claimed by some to be of divine authority; who did this, when, and why? There were excluded from the New Testament twenty- four books written during, or immediately after, the apostolic times by Polycarp, Ignatius, and others; including gospels, acts, and epistles. All these, together with the books of Jude, James, 2d and 3d John, and 2d Peter, and the Apoca lypse, were at first excluded, though a part are now admitted. Who excluded all these at the first, and admitted a part afterwards ; when, and why? The canon of the Old Testament was made up by the Council of Trent, March 8, 1546, from such evidence, gathered from the Fathers, as they judged of authority, in and by which the Apoc- 52 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE ryphal books of Tobit, Judith, Wisdom, Serach, Baruch, the Maccabees, Daniel, Esdras, Eccle- siasticus, Bel and the Dragon, and Manasses, were admitted as of divine authority. These have been since excluded by Protestant Christians. Why were they so admitted ; and why and when were they subsequently excluded? Was it upon any extrinsic evidence; and, if so, upon what? Was it traditional ; on what was that tradition founded? Was it on internal or intrinsic evidence ? we have that as fully as they, — nay, we have it much more full and exhaustive; and, if upon the character of this internal evidence, what is that but bring ing the human judgment to determine what and where rests the divine element in these ancient records, — nay, further, whether there be a divine element in them at all ; accepting the very thing in others far less qualified, that we deem sacrilege in ourselves, with all the accumulated scientific wisdom, critical power, and searching analysis, which minds better trained than the world ever yet saw bring to this investigation? Why is it more allowable to exclude a whole book on its internal evidence, than parts of a book for the like reason? The whole book is excluded be cause human judgment finds in it only the human INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 53 element ; why not a part or parts of a book for the same reason ? or does the presence of a divine element anywhere in the record transmute every thing it contains into the pure gold of infallibility ? The same train of argument may be applied to the books of the New Testament. They were all written and collected within one hundred and twenty years after the crucifixion ; and those ex cluded, many of them, about the same time. We have those books before us, and all the evidence possessed by those who passed judgment on them. Nor are we to be deluded at this day by any as sumption of supernatural enlightenment in the corporate and collective church body or council, passing judgment in the premises. There was little enough of the divine in the judgment of men who celebrated the virtues of celibacy and celestial virginity, and inaugurated some of the most crying abuses in the Christian Church, un der which the world has groaned for fifteen cen turies. No : they were but men. Some of them stars of the first magnitude in their generation, some of them the worst men the world ever saw, more barbarous and infamous than the Pagans they met and conquered. This arrogant assump tion of Church infallibility is the germ or seed- 54 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE plant of the pretence of infallibility we are now considering : every book admitted into the canon was infallible, because the Church said so. We call for proofs, and are answered by astonishment and bluster, and the danger of treading with un- sanctified feet on holy ground. If the positive philosophy has done no other service in its scien tific department, it is to be praised for this, that it has smitten to the dust this crown of sacerdotal pride and authority, and routed for ever the array of ghostly forces by which humanity had been so long and so cruelly dominated and enslaved; wresting its enlightened reason and intelligent faith from its infamous and mercenary clutch. Doubtless, in its zeal, it has gone too far ; but time and a wider generalization will teach it, that there is a realm of the supernatural, and "more things in heaven and earth than are dreamed of in its philosophy." Human, fallible men, then, have assumed to judge what books are canonical and what are spurious ; and we may sit down contented with their judgment if we see fit : but upon what principle is an interdict to be put upon a re-examination of these grave questions, and the ground of them. Had church or council or conclave exclusive and paramount jurisdiction in INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 55 former ages ; and is the doctrine of stare decisis to be invoked to stay for ever all new evidences to reverse or modify their decrees? We have reversed them already on questions of church principles and church polity : why not in more vital things? We argue, then, from all this, that as the human judgment has determined what books are to be deemed to contain any divine element, so we are entitled to judge further in which and where the divine element and the human element exist or coexist ; and this judgment is to be made up from all the lights which reason, science, philoso phy, history, faith, and experience are able to afford, and with a reverent regard to the sacred- ness of the subject, and its close connection with the weal or woe of our immortality. We should not fail to remember, however, that the Church has never yet determined that these records, literally and verbally, in every letter and line of them, are infallible, except with the most important proviso, that the Church is to interpret what they mean ; which thus lodges the element of infallibility rather in the church than in the record, for church interpretation is of the most pliable and india-rubber character, — "this is my 56 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE body" to be construed literally; "I am the vine," "I am the door," metaphorically : the first literally, because of the use that might be made of it as an element of priestly power in the mystery of the mass ; the last figuratively, because no such use was possible. We stand, then, upon the human selection of the books, — some only out of many, and some of these vastly questionable ; human translation into new languages from the Hebrew and Greek ; human interpretation of the text so translated. Can we stand upon the dogma, that every letter and line of what is so selected, translated, and interpreted by human decision and wisdom, is verbally and infallibly divine, — the very voice of God, without question or mistake? We think not. We admit, — nay more, we claim and insist as vital to Christianity, — that there is in these records a human and fallible element, running through their cosmogony, chronology, history, biography ; that the writers, although inspired men, made use, in the impartation of their mes sages, of the traditions, knowledges, sciences, and histories, as understood in their day; that they not only described natural phenomena ac cording to appearances, as has long been ad- INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 57 mitted, but often incorrectly, and yet according to their understanding of them ; that intermingled with the burden of their prophecy was the wail of their human anguish and human sympathy ; that while as apostles they were to take no thought how or what they should speak, because it was given or suggested to them, in the same hour, what they should speak in answer to their ene mies, or in confirmation of the claims of the Son of God as the Christ, yet this did not dispense with, or supersede the use of, their own knowl edge and faculties in enforcement or illustration of the themes and topics thus supernaturally sug gested. And so, while the burden of Egypt or Tyre or Nineveh swept in panoramic view before the spiritual vision of the rapt prophet ; while the terrible pictures of coming events cast their shadows before, unrolling preternaturally what the after ages in their long vicissitudes would fulfil, — the prophet was left to paint the visions with colors from his own laboratory of thought, and tell what he saw in human language, still pointed and intensified by the supernal imagery which divine revelation had so disclosed. The first argument bearing upon this point, we have already partially considered ; to wit, 58 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE that, while these records are written by men, they do not, for the most part, themselves claim that there is no human element in them. In the his tory of the creation of the world and its inhab itants, and of the names, genealogies, and ages of those who lived before the flood, of the re- peopling of the earth, and the dispersion from Babel ; of the patriarchal times and scenes, — all is told without an}' statement of the source whence the information was derived, — whether from tra dition, or ancient writings, or monuments, or hieroglyphics ; and the same remark applies to much of those Hebrew annals which run through the Pentateuch, the Judges, the Kings, and even down to the captivity. But when the narrator comes to speak the language of a lawgiver, or breaks into prophecy, there immediately shines over the record a diviner light, because he touches profundities, and reaches heights, which partake themselves of the supernatural. In gathering up what tradition had preserved, or earlier records embodied, human diligence and candor were equal to the emergency ; but in disclosing to humanity a moral and spiritual code, such as no human wisdom had ever equalled or superseded, and in lifting the veil from future ages to bare to the INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 59 eye what God would do in after times, then came, as was needed, the informing power and inspiration of the Almighty. But more in respect to this divine element by and by. 60 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE CHAPTER VII. TT has been asserted, that the infallibility of the Old-Testament scriptures is established by references in the New, by quotations made from them by Christ and his apostles ; but no proof of the infallibility of a whole book arises from any reference to a single prophecy contained in it. So far as the prophecy was concerned, such fulfil ment proved its truth, but by no means authenti cated every thing historical, cosmical, or doctrinal, uttered by the same writer. It was the things written in the books of Moses, the Prophets, and Psalms, concerning Christ, that were to have com plete fulfilment, and so he informed his amazed disciples after his resurrection ; and although he came not to destroy the Law and the Prophets, but to fulfil, yet in referring to the law of reprisals, the lex talionis, the eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, of the Hebrew code, he repudiated the whole system, with the authoritative announce ment, "But I say unto you, Love your enemies," INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 6 1 &c. What he came not to destroy was the im perative and eternal obligation of the moral pre cepts, which were infallible ; what he came to alter and annul, were those politic and Mosaic institutes, which were wise for the culture of a rude and unintellectual people, but no longer ap plicable when a larger development had been attained, and a higher life become practicable. The new flower shot out from the old stem, through the opening bud of prophecy ; and Christianity became an efflorescence of Judaism, colored and beautified with its subtlest spirit, and charged with the weight and wisdom of its sub- limest harmonies. So that, while he advised his hearers to obey the instructions of those "who sat in Moses' seat," it was only so far as these teach ings were in accord with the higher underlying principles of thought and action which it was his great mission to inculcate. Moses was but initia tive and rudimental : the finality and spiritual completeness were in Christ. Nor do the writers of the New Testament anywhere claim, that their messages are absolutely free from all human mix ture or imperfection, or that their records were ' any more infallible than their words or teachings. The promise of "another comforter" belongs to 62 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE all of Christ's followers, and would prove every Christian infallible. How, then, should Paul be so mistaken, when he called the High Priest a "whited wall," — as he was, — not knowing he was High Priest? Nay, on the plenary and ver bal theory, how could Paul and Peter differ so radically? how should the same events be so differently related as to particulars by different evangelists? Take the voice which came from heaven at the baptism, as instanced by Professor Stowe, Matt. ii. 17, — "This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased;" Mark i. 11, "Thou art my beloved Son," &c. ; Luke iii. 22, "Thou art," &c, "in thee I am well pleased." Compare the quotations of Matthew and Luke (chap, iv.) from Deuteronomy, viii. 3, and see how they dif fer. So in respect to the centurion : Luke, vii. 2-10, has it, that he sent the elders of the Jews to Jesus to heal his servant, and did not see him ; Matthew, viii. 5-13, has it, that the centurion applied in person, and held a conversation with the Master. So, read 2 Sam. xxii. for David"s psalm of thanksgiving for deliverance from Saul, and read the same (Psalm xviii.) as it stands in the collection, and note the verbal differences in almost every verse. So the one hundred and INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD- 63 eleven verses of Matt, v., vi., and vii., condensed in different language in Luke. Which is the true reading in all these discrepant relations, oh the verbal theory of absolute infallibility? and why have we " Harmonies " of the Four Gospels but upon the admitted fact that they differ in language, and often in facts ? What need of all this if the language is inspired, and inspiration and infallibility are synonymous? And here we should advert to the argument or suggestion of Froude, in his criticism on the gos pel histories, in which he supposes, that, imme diately after the resurrection, the mother and brethren and disciples of Christ would naturally bring together, as they had a vivid recollection of the facts, the principal stirring incidents of his life and death, with his sayings and works ; a sort of incomplete and fragmentary "memoirs," which may have been extant for some time, even after the Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, were written, and which formed the materials from which these several writers drew their histories, in addition to the recollection of Matthew, as neither Mark nor Luke were apos tles. This fact, if so, would account for the verbal discrepancies observable in these Gospels, 64 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE where accounts are given evidently of the same events. It would account, further, for the fact, otherwise never yet explained, that Justin Martyr, who was born in the year 89, and lived to the age of seventy-six, never once speaks of either of the evangelists by name ; and yet it is clear, from his writings, that he was perfectly familiar with the history of the events recorded by Luke, the facts of which he quotes from something which he styles memoirs "of the apostles ; " while, in quot ing from the Apocalypse or the Old Testament, he uniformly names his author. So Tatian, Barna- bus, Clement, Polycarp, each, in quoting the language of the Gospels, quotes it often, in differ ent persons and tenses, with additions not found in the Gospels at all, or any thing like them. Did they quote also from these memoirs, the com mon source of all these histories? and, whether they did or no, they evidently had never dreamed of such a thing as verbal infallibility. It would be most surprising, when the disciples after the resurrection were scattered everywhere, preach ing Jesus, that, for ten, twenty, thirty years, not a scrap of written memoir should have been made of him by the mother that bore him, by the dis ciples that loved him as a friend and worshipped INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 65 him as a God. Think, if such a being should appear to-day, how the literature of the age would be crammed with the evidences of his doings and his fame ; the whole body of the New Testament, dating from about the year 50 to 90, according to the most reliable chronologies. Nor do the best Christian writers set up this claim for verbal infallibility. Bishop Home, in his introduction to the study of the Scriptures, defines inspiration as the "imparting of such a degree of divine assistance, influence, or guid ance, as should enable the authors to communi cate religious knowledge to others without error."* "When it is said the Scriptures were divinely inspired, we are not to understand that God suggested every word, or dictated every expres sion. From the different styles in which the books are written, the different manner in which the events are related and predicted, it appears that the sacred penmen were permitted to write as their several tempers, understandings, and habits of life directed ; and the knowledge communi cated to them by inspiration in their writings, was applied by them in the same manner as any knowledge acquired by ordinary means. Nor is * Vol. 1. p. 229. s 66 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE it to be supposed they were inspired in every fact which they related, or in every precept which they delivered. They were left to the common use of their faculties, and did not stand in need on every occasion of supernatural communication, which was afforded only when necessary. Nor does it follow, that they derived from revelation the knowledge of those things which might be collected from the common sources of human in telligence. Some of their books were compiled from sacred annals, written by prophets and seers, from public records and documents of uninspired men." — "Whatever may be true re specting the historical portions, we may be fully convinced that the prophetical parts come from God;" and much more from this eminent divine to the like import. Robertson, the late eloquent divine of Brighton, says, "The inspiration of the Bible is a large subject. I hold it inspired, not dictated. It is the word of God, the words of man : as the former, perfect ; as the latter, imperfect. God the Spirit, as a Sanctifier, does not produce absolute perfection of human character ; God the Spirit, as an Inspirer, does not produce absolute per fection of human knowledge. I believe Bibli- INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 67 olatry to be as superstitious, as false, and almost as dangerous, as Romanism." "This doctrine in question," says Coleridge, " petrifies at once the whole body of Holy Writ, with all its harmonies, and symmetrical grada tions, the flexile and the rigid, — the supporting hard, and the clothing soft, the blood which is the life, the intelligencing nerves, and the rudely woven but soft and springy cellular substances, in which all are imbedded and tightly bound together, — this breathing organism, this pan- harmonicon, which I have seen stand on its feet as a man and with a man's voice given to it, the doctrine in question turns into a colossal Mem- non's head, a hollow passage for a voice, that mocks the voices of many men, speaks in their names, and is yet but one voice and the same, and no man uttered it, and never in a human heart was it conceived." And then he breaks out in that grand climacteric, which demonstrates beyond all argument the existence of the human element, with a force and grandeur unequalled in all his wonderful compositions : — " Curse ye Meroz, curse ye bitterly the inhab itants thereof," sang Deborah. Was it any personal wrong, rapine, or insult she or the house of Lapidoth 68 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE had received from Jabin or Sisera ? No : she had dwelt under her palm-tree in the depth of the moun tain ; but she was a mother in Israel, and with a mother's heart, and the vehemency of a mother's and a patriot's love, she had shot the light of love from her eyes, and poured the blessings of love from her lips upon those who had jeopardied their lives unto the death against the oppressor. As long as I have this image of Deborah before my eyes, and while I throw myself back into the age and country of this Hebrew Bonduca, in the not yet tamed chaos of the spiritual creation, — with this impassioned, high- souled, heroic woman, I feel as if I were among the first ferment of the great affections. In all that is fierce and inordinate, I am made to know and be grate ful for the clearer and purer radiance which shines on a Christian's path ; while in the self-oblivion of these heroes of the Old Testament, their elevation above all low and individual interests, the entire and vehement devotion of their total being to their Master, I find lessons of humility, and rousing examples of faith and fealty. But let me once be persuaded that all these heart-awakening utterances of human hearts, of men of like passions with myself, — their sorrowing, rejoic ing, suffering, triumphing, — are but a Divina Corn- media of a superhuman ventriloquist ; that the Royal Harper, to whom I have so often submitted myself as a many-stringed instrument for his fire-tipped fingers to traverse, while every several nerve of emotion, pas sion, thought, that thrills the flesh and blood of our common humanity, responded to the touch ; that this INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 69 sweet Psalmist of Israel was himself a mere instru ment, — a harp, an automaton, — poet, mourner, sup pliant, all is gone, — all sympathy, all example: I listen in awe and fear, but in perplexity and confusion of spirit." * Nor is it at all likely, in the nature of things, that what human hands have written should pos sess any greater infallibility than what human lips have spoken. Is not the promise, that Christ will be with his ministers in preaching his Gospel to the end of time, clear and explicit? while no such promise can be found in respect to their writings. And is it true, therefore, that every minister is inspired in his messages, and utters only what is absolutely and infallibly true ? Even the apostles differed about ceremonies and ordi nances, and Peter was supposed to be wrong : where was his infallibility ? It was of the same character as that of his pretended successors. In this thing, his human judgment was at fault : it was a matter, so to speak, which inspiration could not stoop to meddle with. But is there any practical difficulty whatever in Christian experi ence receiving and feeding on the spiritual and * Coleridge's Works, vol. v. p. 592. 70 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE moral truths which come to it from the preacher's lips, and rejecting or laying aside what is er roneous? It is done every sabbath in all the con gregations of the land. INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 71 CHAPTER VIII. TDUT the absolute and verbal infallibility of every Bible utterance is disproved by many and accumulating facts, every day brought to light in astronomic, geologic, meteorologic, chron ologic and cosmic science. It is said that John Wesley, to the day of his death, distrusted the Copernican system, and believed that the sun went round the earth, because the Bible said so : if this was true, he only followed the learned theologic doctors who refuted Columbus, and im prisoned Galileo. It may be replied, that this was owing to an incorrect and faulty interpretation ; that matters in biblical history are described according to ap pearances. But did not the Church, in expound ing the Pentateuch, always account the six days of creation as periods of twenty-four hours, and the sabbath of rest as a natural day, until geology made a new interpretation of the record a neces sity? when it was discovered, as Tayler Lewis 72 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE demonstrates in his three separate books, that these days should have been regarded as eons, immeasurable periods, stretching through incon ceivable abysses of time, and God's sabbath of rest now in progress ; and that the command, that man should rest on the seventh day of the week, was duly enforced to the Jew by the con sideration, that God rested when the work of creation was finished, doing his holy work of re demption in his long sabbath ; and so man should cease from servile employ, and dedicate one- seventh of his time to the holy work of worship and religious culture. Had geologic science re mained as it was before the days of Murchison, Hugh Miller, and Dana, would the Mosaic cos mogony have been brought into the condition in which it stands to-day? Yet our faith need not have staggered, had it been proved that Moses himself supposed these creative time-periods were natural days. Then, again, the chronology of the Hebrew histories cannot be reconciled by more than one thousand years. Moreover, the antiquity of man, and his existence on the globe for over six thou sand years, are fast becoming more than proba bilities. If his creation followed upon the tertiary INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 73 period, the post-pliocene, when every thing was in readiness, and his habitation prepared sub stantially as it now is, how long is it since the commencement of that period? More than thirty thousand years has it taken to wear away the rock at Niagara to its present point, between Table Rock and Goat Island, from where it origi nally started, from the water-marks in the rocks along the shores, according to Sir Charles Lyell. From fifty to sixty thousand years do the alluvial deltas at the mouth of the Nile indicate, especially as the remains of human handicraft, brick, are found at the depth of sixty feet below the peri style of the obelisk of Heliopolis. And so, valley and cave and rock and bone, all testify to periods five, perhaps ten, times that which the received chronologies would indicate. It is needless even to allude to the proofs, which are increasing every day, that since man was created, he has inhabited this globe, perhaps even thirty thousand years. So, also, when the Hebrew records come to speak of numbers, they are now admitted by the best biblical scholars to be out of all proportion often to the subject to which they are related; and loud complaints are uttered of the falsification of these numbers by the Jewish transcribers. Six 74 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE hundred thousand fighting men crossing the Red Sea, under Moses, demanding over two million of souls in all, and forming a moving city of tents over thirty miles in circumference, — larger than New York and all its contiguous and sister cities put together, — with flocks and herds, for use and sacrifice, in proportion. Abijah has four hundred thousand men, and Jeroboam eight hun dred thousand, of which half a million fell in one battle ; and all drawn from a country of less extent than four counties in the State of New York. Napoleon depopulated France for half a million of men and boys, to prosecute his cam paign to Moscow ; and the immense armies of our late war, drawn from thirty -four States, never together equalled this Hebrew throng, i Chron. chap. xii. enumerates three hundred and forty thousand eight hundred and twenty-two warriors that went to Hebron, to crown David king, and were there three days eating and drinking, beside an unnumbered host with them ! And we may remark, in these vast numbers, how seldom the hundreds are used, as if the multitudinous array could only be expressed by thousands. " Ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousand of thousands," seems to have been a line of familiar INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 75 numerals to the Hebrew imagination. So the startling numbers of animals said to be sacrificed on occasions of high feasting and worship : the blood of so many would have swelled from brooks into a river on which a navy might float ! But time would fail to speak of all the dif ficulties that cluster about the idea of a verbal and literal inspiration. I have named but a speci men of them ; to which I ought to add, that, in respect to the Old Testament, all the text of it was originally written without vowels or double letters of any kind, very much after the manner of writing short-hand to-day, — without vowel points, — the pronunciation even being traditional, and passing down from instructor to pupil, and so written out from this imperfect short-hand since the Christian era, and after the Hebrew became a dead language. What wonder, then, that it has imperfections? the great marvel and miracle is, that it has no more. Let any man to-day undertake to write out the short-hand notes of a stenographer, taken fifty years ago, and see how near he could get to the sense and actual meaning of the symbols. "The fact is," says a recent writer, "the Hebrew tongue was so imperfect a language, until the vowels were added to it, that 76 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE the Old Testament, as originally written, was only a sort of help to the memory and traditionary teachings of fallible scribes and priests, to whom were committed the oracles of God. A ' word ' and a ' pestilence ' were expressed by the same consonants, and whether it was the one or the other depended on the context, or the authority of the living teacher ! But it was a language which, while it expressed the loftiest inspiration of thought at every line, seems to have been con structed on purpose to render the idea of verbal infallibility peculiarly improbable, — a language that leaned upon the inward inspiration of the living fallible teacher, in every letter and line of it, for support and intelligibility. Let any Hebrew scholar take up the unpointed text of the ancient Hebrew, and he will find that he has the language of that unpointed original yet to learn." * Having thus considered and disproved, as we imagine, the proposition, that inspiration is sy nonymous with human genius, and shown that it is something, higher, deeper, holier, than the un aided intellect of even Shakspeare or Milton ever conceived (although these are unfair examples, as their genius was impregnated with, and em- * Curtis, p. 173. INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 77 ployed so largely upon, Christian topics, that it is impossible to separate them : the efforts of Pagan scholars, to whom Christianity was unknown, are only in point here) ; having also shown that there is a human element in the Scriptures, and that, consequently, they are not infallible, but liable to mistake, — we were next to consider, in order, some of the objections which have been urged against admitting that any part of the Bible is, or may be, incorrect and less than divine. 1. It is feared it will result in unsettling the foundations of our faith, if it be admitted for a moment that any part or portion of what we have always regarded as God's word should be found to be only the word of man. But the simple answer to all this is, Is it true? Was a Christian life ever promoted or strengthened by the incul cation of error, or the belief of falsehood? If you lie to your child to produce obedience, are you and the child made better or worse? Beside, it is not true that the foundations of Christian faith and hope rest upon the footing of a verbal inspiration of the Scriptures. No : the soul takes up and appropriates what is fitted to its spiritual and moral states arid necessities. It relies upon the great disclosures of immortality ; upon its love 78 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE of goodness and truth ; upon its groundings in virtue, justice, and loyalty ; upon its conformity more and more to God's image and likeness, as exemplified in Christ ; upon those inward work ings of the soul by which it becomes meet to be partaker of the heavenly inheritance and heir of celestial royalties. Standing on these Pisgah tops, round which the rays of the divine glory are falling, it sees heaven open, and Jesus stand ing at the right hand of God. With faith and hope' and love and penitence and holy fear, and filial confidence, and loyalty, blazing like a per petual Shechinah, on the altar of the soul, and irradiating, like the pillar of fire, all the dark places and sorrowful ways of its earthly pilgrim age, — tell me if there be any danger of stum bling or loss, should this earthly habitation prove to be millions of years older than it had been taught to believe, or that many historical and natural facts related turn out to be different from what the writer evidently supposed. Did any such disastrous results follow the correction of ancient errors respecting the flatness of the earth ; the dissipation of the supposed " firmament," with the stars peering through its windows and loop holes, scintillations of the glory beyond ; the post- INCARNA TE AND WRITTEN WORD. 79 ponement of the end of the world, which the apostles all deemed so near at hand ; and many other pious hallucinations, too numerous to men tion? And yet these same fears were as loudly and honestly expressed then as now ; and the same holy horror was felt at new glosses and in terpretations as are now expressed in respect to the correction of the facts which modern learning has demonstrated to be false. No : the danger, if any, presses from another direction. It is in culcating the dogma of verbal inspiration and infallibility, and then upon this blind belief open ing the blaze of scientific and critical learning, which proves to the most sceptical the inaccuracy of many things before deemed unquestionable ; and then, in the amazement of the shock and re coil, there is danger, that a disappointed credulity may break away from all revelation, and sweep recklessly into the darkness of infidelity. Never fear the truth, and never fear to teach it. God will take care of the faith of his people, and pilot them safely through all the perils of their journey, especially all perils coming from a knowledge of the facts of his natural and supernatural king doms. 2. But how, says the objector, are you to sepa- 8o THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE rate the divine from the human in revelation ; and if human judgment can be permitted to effect this, what security is there that it may not in the end fritter away the whole record? This argu ment is conclusive to many minds, and begets a sort of suspense of faith ; believing there is a human element, and yet fearing for the safety of the ark of God, if it should prove true. The first observation pertinent here is, that we have already attempted to separate the divine from the human in the canonical and apocryphal books, ourselves pronouncing authoritatively which con tains the divine element, and which the human. This judgment may be right, and it may be wrong. We may possibly have rejected some in which the voice of God might have been heard, should we reverently listen ; and have admitted some for which man alone was responsible. Luther called the epistle of James an epistle of straw, and we find much divine teaching in it notwithstanding. The Council of Trent found the divine voice in all the apocryphal books, while we think otherwise. What terrific disasters have followed on these several conflicting judg ments? We have all the books, admitted and rejected ; and may thus avail ourselves of all they INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 8 1 teach of good : and do in fact avail ourselves of it in this very way. Is there any faintness at the heart of Christendom to-day, by reason of these discrepancies? Nor would any greater difficulty follow any further selection in this same depart ment. In truth, each hearer or reader silently and unconsciously makes it for himself every time he reads or listens to the reading of the records. He may not, in so many words, discredit so much, and admit the rest ; but he permits it to pass by and over him ; he gives it a quiet and decorous hearing, and then dismisses it as some thing which is to enter in no way into the web and woof of thought or character. His treatment of the message indicates plainly, that he does not regard it as divine. I admit that in so doing he may be mistaken ; but I am now concerned only with the fact that this selecting process is carried on, and not with the accuracy of its results. 3. But if such separation of the divine and human cannot be accurately made once for all, and that become true for every other man which is true for me, it is only another indication of God's wisdom, in so intermingling the food for the soul with that which tempers it to our aliment and good, that we can incorporate into our intel- 82 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE lectual, moral, and spiritual system that which is suited to our wants and necessities. To supply the needs of our human infirmity, the divine aid must condescend to the plane of the human, using human instrumentalities, and pouring the divine floods through the channels of human adaptation, that we may not be dazzled and blinded by the light, which, when properly re ceived, is the life of the soul. And so Christ veiled and blended his uncreated effulgence in human conditions, and while he spake as a man was dutiful as a son, generous and loving as a friend, yet rayed out his power with the au thority of God. Will you point to the man, in all the ages, who ever yet drew the line of separation between the human and the divine element in Christ; or could say, with authority, here the divine ended and the human alone was left? And if this be impossible, and the attempt savors some thing of blasphemy, who shall say that may be done with the written word, when with the incar nate word it is impossible? Can you separate spirit from matter in your own being, — the life" from the texture which life animates, thought and affection from the brain through which they act? No ; and yet you live and act and feel, and INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 83 are no less efficient in the duties and responsibili ties of life, than if you could file away every faculty and function of your being in a nicely labelled and appropriate psychological depart ment. Man is not the flute or organ, and God's voice the music. No : the tones are human not less than the instrument; but all along there breathes through their harmonies diviner notes, and blends the music of a loftier song than mortal mind con ceived or mortal lips could utter. 4. But, says the objector, it tends to rationalism and the weakening of authority in religion. If this is said in the Papal sense, it is its best re commendation : we are intently bent on such rationalism, and the weakening of all such au thority. It is only a blind credulity that ignores the processes of the understanding, and bows ser vilely to the decrees of a spiritual despot, not the first element of Christianity in it all. But if the objection carries with it the idea that we are to submit every allegation of Scripture to the arbit rament of reason before giving it credence, we deny that it has any such tendency. When God speaks, man should reverently hear and obey. That he should utter what the reason could not 84 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE discover is to be expected, and marks the divinity of the message ; that the unmistakable stamp of supernaturalism should blaze out all over the record is exactly the signet of its genuineness. Inspiration never supplied the deficiencies of hu man indolence, any more than the insolence of human pride. Is there any danger we shall cut loose from a spiritual system and the ethical ob ligations of a universal religion, because we dis miss a priest or Levite who affects a mysterious knowledge of spiritual things, when we know him often to be a mere dolt or charlatan in mat ters of literature, science, or philosophy? Quack ery in any department is always superlatively profound. As we distrust more and more human authority, so we cling closer to the authority of God. INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 85 CHAPTER IX. T TAVING thus disposed of the objections usu ally urged against giving up the dogma of a verbal and plenary inspiration of the whole record, it remains to state some of the difficulties in maintaining it, in addition to those before mentioned. We have already seen that this was not an article of the early church : it has been developed by degrees since the era of the Refor mation, and, mainly, since the Westminster As sembly gave the sanction of its authority to the doctrine : it was founded on no reason, but was simply a dogmatic statement put forth for the acceptance of the churches. So the great diversities of style and thought, the discrepancies already adverted to, show that, while the uniform object and intent was the reve lation and enforcement of moral and religious truth, suited to man's fallen nature as working in the lines and surrounded by the forces of a spirit ual system, it came to us clothed in the mental 86 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE habits and variant modes of expression, figure, illustration, and allusions, which men of different types of mind and intellectual culture present; showing that, while man delivered God's mes sage, it was God also who spake through and in him. The voice was the voice of Jacob, while the hands were the hands of Esau. Were it God's voice only, we should expect uniformity of style and find it. So, too, the translator would need the same spirit of infallibility as the writer, and especially in putting into intelligible form the ancient, un pointed, and unvowelled Hebrew. Of all trans lations, the more modern are admitted to be most correct ; and this is just as we should expect, as we now have profounder scholars than Jerome, or the Seventy, or the Doctors of King James, or Tindale or Wickliff or Luther? This idea of verbal infallibility has been the prolific mother of more absurd glosses, and fanci ful and spiritualizing interpretation of the text, than all other sources put together. Hidden meanings searched for in the history, in the words, in the letters ; some fanciful analogy paraded as the true sense and occult meaning of it all. Every parable, every miracle, had its spiritual counter- INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 87 part, in which its true significance lay concealed ; the Bible was a riddle, to be spelled out by the skill of the initiated. Every letter was divine, because, wrapped up in its coatings like a precious seed within its shell, lay its mysterious and germi- nant life, to be called forth by the masterly breath of spiritualized interpretation. But, more than all, these views of verbal infal libility place God in nature, and God in revela tion, in direct and irreconcilable antagonism. God is One : " with him is no variableness, nor the shadow of turning." God in nature we can see, feel, handle, understand, — not, it is true, the First Great Cause, and all the modes of his work ing in the pre-historic ages ; but the facts and laws of nature are being laid bare to the scientific eye with an accuracy that leaves no room for question or mistake. Every institution of learn ing is filled with these developments. The eager, anxious minds of the young are filled with them ; and grave professors are in deep solici tude as to how far they are to invalidate the verbal inspiration of the record. There is mis take somewhere on the literal theory : is it in the scientific facts? That is impossible. What remains but either that the records of inspiration 88 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE are all human and fallible, or partly human and partly divine. We have adverted to so many of the proofs that the Bible contains a divine communication already, that we might safely leave the argument here ; having found that it was something more than the outpourings of human genius, and yet a genuine inspiration coming to man's ears and heart through the agency of fallible humanity. But the gravity of the theme requires a more formal and logical statement of this our main and affirmative proposition. We suppose, then, what ever else may be true of it, that the inspiration was of the man, and not simply of the language he uttered, or the sentiment he conveyed. If God spake to Moses or Joshua or Samuel by a person age, and in an audible voice, such message was addressed to his attention and memory. Just like a communication received from a friend, he would be required to impress it upon his memory, so as to reproduce it in its substantial integrity, without special reference further to its mere verbal dress ing ; and the same remark applies to the vision or the dream. These were penned down, or delivered afterwards, as they were remembered ; and perhaps the record of it written many years INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 89 after by another hand. How long after God ap peared to Abraham in a dream did Moses, or whoever wrote it, transcribe this ; and from what record was it taken? So Balaam blessed Israel, taking up his parable and speaking what God bid him ; and this prophecy seems to have been uttered in a trance, while the Spirit of the Lord was upon him, but recorded long after, and probably from tradition. The inspiration, then, did not dispense with or supersede human faculties, — attention, percep tion, memory, judgment, — and the free use of them all. There was such an infusion and inter- penetration of human faculty by a divine strength and spirit, that the mind was nerved, exalted, stimulated ; the imaginative faculty winged with fiery vigor, and glorified with supernal light : but this was not all. There was added or put into this human vehicle what it was to carry or de liver, — matters which otherwise it could not know ; something ab extra the mind ; information coming to it from without, not self-originating ; a supersensuous panorama hung up before the soul in its trance or vision or dream, which it was to note and remember and transcribe in the sym bols of language fit for its expression to others. 90 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE But while this communication to the man was divine, the language and imagery of the man were human, as much as the man was human who employed it. So when the message was by an audible voice, it was a voice uttered to the pro phet, and not in or through the prophet. The man stood all the while between God and the people ; and three things must always concur to make the message verbally divine, — first, that the prophet has a communication in human speech, not ideally but verbally; second, that he delivers the exact language ; and, third, that the historian write it in that literal and exact phraseology. How much Bible truth will bear this test? So that, approximately, we arrive at this result : When the writer of Scripture dealt with the human, with that in nature or life or history, which had in it only the human element ; what he might know by tradition or observation or reflection or history, — he was left to employ those human faculties which in uninspired men lead to the same results ; but when there broke over his soul visions of the supernatural, as in new revelations or prophecy, whether these con cerned the affairs of heaven or of earth, man's des tiny in time or in eternity, there came with them INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 91 the voice of God unquestioned and infallible, which the intuitions of conscience, as well as the unfoldings of history, stamp with unmistakable verification. Then, again, every prophetical announcement uttered by the writers, — those relating to the Messiah ; those predicting the fate of nations, kings, empires, cities ; the burden of Egypt, Tyre, Nineveh ; the fate of Jerusalem and of the Jews, — all these and more, with which the sacred record is gemmed, and which the ages affirm and exemplify, with a steady, wonderful, and ever growing fulfilment, so convincing that it requires the hardihood of a debauched atheism to deny it, — all these are none other than the voices of God to man ; for no human wisdom could forecast these great events which come rolling up in their order, out of the mutations and developments of time. God's eye alone sees them ; God's hand alone controls them. Natural religion may dis close God's natural attributes ; and these were known dimly to Socrates and Cicero and Seneca, to the moralists and philosophers of Paganism. But God's moral attributes, and the wonders of his spiritual kingdom, his redemptive system of grace and glory, the unimagined mysteries of im- 92 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE mortality, must be revealed : they are supernatural facts, and demand supernatural disclosure. And so the historic economy of the early Hebrew ages was rudimental of all that followed, and is fol lowing to-day : one spirit, one purpose, one plan, runs like a golden thread from Adam to Christ. It was unrolled as fast as humanity could bear it ; down, down, into the future ages, it winds and sparkles, capable of binding into one harmonious whole the church of the Living God, which he hath redeemed out of the whole earth . He spake in prophecy and miracle, in history and providence ; but last of all, by his Son. He came in human ity as well as to humanity, and thus declared God, not in word and idea only, but in vivid and practical exemplification. Heaven stooped to earth ; and the beatitudes of the Godhead shed their radiance and beauty over all its wayward and weary populations. The impartation of moral and religious truth, and the inculcations of duty, in addition to its prophetical office, seem to be the burden of inspiration ; and as we find these in the record, so they " find us." Accepting " God in Christ " as the end and burden of it all, as related to man's deliverance from sin, the Christian has no practical difficulty in finding the INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD- 93 divine element, for it "finds him." The medicine goes after the disease to cure it. The divine strength leaps into human impotence, to give it vigor ; the divine wisdom makes human ignorance wise, divine peace displaces human sorrow, and divine forgiveness covers and counteracts human sin ; divine hope spans the human death-couch with immortal glory, and gives all the meaning it has to this round of trial and care men call life. Not find the divine voice ! it goes after the lost sheep of the house of Israel ; it cries in the wil derness of time. Through all the mistakes and imperfections of men, — writers and readers and preachers, prophets and teachers, — it speaks to the soul with an authority not to be evaded or misunderstood. In reading these precious revela tions, we are not to call in aid the critical faculty, that we may separate as we go along the human from the divine. We may, indeed, set that down as human which our knowledge has proved to be such, in science or in history ; but how slight and unimportant and uninfluential is all this to the true body and genuine import of these Scrip tures ! spots on the sun, motes in the sunbeam, a handful of chaff in a granary of wheat, a few dry stems in a field of verdure, just enough to 94 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE prove a human element, and save the divine from rejection. We are not, then, to suffer disturbance from the inroads of textual and historical criti cism, or be haunted by the grim suspicion, that what so purifies and cheers us is not after all divine. No ; but sitting down to this feast as of God's providing, eat lovingly and thankfully what is fitted to our spiritual nature ; for on it alone can we feed and live : " not in the parch ment or the ink ; not in the vocables or phrases or language ;" not in the style, prosaic or poetic, in which it is conveyed to us ; not in the transla tion or glosses ; but in the divine thought and sen timent wrapped up in the language, and which requires as much divine aid and enlightenment for its recipiency as for its communication, — does the potency and heavenliness of the message re side. Isaac Taylor, in his " Spirit of Hebrew Poetry," page 77, instances the twenty-third Psalm as wholly divine, and as yet wholly human ; the latter in respect to its artificial construction, its metrical composition. " Every phrase and allu sion is metaphoric, nothing literal, — the Lord a shepherd of souls — green pastures — still wa ters — paths of righteousness — valley of the shadow of death — rod and staff — table — anoint- INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 95 ing oil — overfull cup — house of Lord — ever lasting abode." But figures and symbols are incidents of the human mind ; they are adaptations to its limits ; they are the best that can be done in regard to the things of the spiritual life. But divine thought is not conditioned in any manner, certainly not by metaphor or symbol. Now look again at this ode, with its array of human metaphor or symbol. "In its way down three thousand years or more, it has penetrated the depths of millions of hearts ; it has gladdened the homes of destitution and dis comfort; it has whispered hope and joy amidst tears to the utterly solitary and forsaken, whose only refuge was Heaven. Beyond all range of calculation have these dozen lines imparted a power of endurance under suffering, strength in feebleness, and kept alive the flickering flame of religious feeling in hearts nigh to despair ; " and this through the divine element begetting a tran quil trust in God, and a loyal and unshaken re liance upon his love and faithfulness. In its relation to the religious life and health of the soul, it is wholly divine, fraught with life-giving energy. So, too, may a psalm be poetically and divinely 96 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE true, and at the same time scientifically false. Look at the nineteenth Psalm, describing the sun as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, rejoicing as a strong man to run a race, " his going forth is from the end of the heavens, and his circuit unto the ends of it ; " and yet, as to us, he has neither circuit nor going forth. But the inspired import of the magnificent image, couched in this figure, is as true, and will remain so to the end of time, as if it embodied the astronomic verity, according to the teachings of Galileo. The misconception of the poet, as to the facts of physical science, in no way affects the grandeur or significance of the sublime lesson he was read ing to the soul of the glory and majesty of God, as declared to man in the universe around and above him, or in the law, designed to purify and save him. And so I might designate a thousand instances, from poetry sacred and profane, where the sweet est of moral and spiritual truths are conveyed through figures and symbols scientifically false, yet perhaps, as in the rising and setting of the sun, apparently and popularly true ; for it may yet be true that the sun has his circuit, for it is conjectured, that the universe with which we are INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 97 immediately connected moves, in its grand orbit of six hundred millions of years, round one of the fixed stars in Pleiades. Is this the sweet in fluence of Pleiades referred to in Job ? Who can tell? Nor does the existence of the human ele ment invalidate the divine any more than the presence of the divine renders the human of per manent and eternal obligation. What ! because Moses did not head a procession of two millions over the Red Sea, am I therefore absolved from the obligations imposed by Christ our Master? Because Jeroboam did not lose three hundred thousand warriors in one battle, are virtue and truth, benevolence and love, no longer Christian duties? Because the sun and moon did not stand still for Joshua to smite his enemies, am I there fore licensed to cheat and lie and steal ? And so, on the other hand, because Moses directed the killing of all the Moabite women who had been married, and the making slaves of the young, is this allowable in modern war? Because Samuel hewed Agag in pieces, may we lawfully murder prisoners of war in cold blood? Because the ancient patriarchs and prophets had hundreds of wives and concubines, is Mormon polygamy a divine institution? 7 98 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE Many things were done as political necessities, in the early ages, which in us would be the bold est of crimes ; and so we mark the progressive steps of humanity from barbarism to Christian civilization, from the rude to the refined, from the immature concrete to the comprehensive ab stract, from empirical instances to general laws ; the world educated, in brain and heart, out of its rough and unspiritual states into the pure ethical condition contemplated in the sermon on the mount. What remains, then, but that we receive the Scriptures as containing the pure word of God, and all things necessary to our Christian culture in time, and our eternal felicity in the life which is to come ? Nothing essential to this is of man : he is the medium of its communication ; but the truth is of God. Did a devout and loving soul ever yet mistake it? Is not the promise, that Christians should be let into all truth, as ap plicable to its reception as to its communication? Are we not to try the spirits? Is there not a spiritual consciousness in the spiritual body, as well as in each member of it, that selects and appropriates to its needs the divine element with an intuitive and infallible science. No need of selections and criticisms and separations. The INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 99 human element is no more than the blur of a type, or the mispaging of a sentence, and where it clearly exists, it compasses often a divine end ; but it accounts for all mistakes, and covers all imperfections. The record is still the Word of God, and the only living reformatory power that has survived the changes which have come over all the works of man. His kingdoms, dynasties, policies, phi losophies, religions, — these have flourished and fallen, gone like the Pharo's lights, that have dis appeared one by one from all the high headlands and promontories of the world. Star after star has faded, light after light gone out; all but this, which grows brighter and purer as the ages wane, not because it shines from towers whose founda tions rest on the rocks of Time, but because its life is fed, and its radiance glitters, from the fin gers of God. We have thus tried to find out the truth in this much-vexed question of biblical inspiration and infallibility. There is room, doubtless, for honest questions and differences. We think, to a candid mind the suggestions we have made should not be wholly unsatisfactory. Not that the subject is cleared of all mystery ; for, in the nature of it, IOO THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE it is incomprehensible. We believe as a fact, that there are three persons or manifestations, yet one God ; but no human intellect ever yet comprehended the fact, nor could a thousand Nicene Councils state it in apprehensive formula. We believe that we are body and soul, matter and mind, acting and interacting to make up the man ; but did any one ever yet explain the modus of these influences? We believe God's Spirit, acting on the human spirit, — by suggestion, by re straint, by purification, — makes it over in his own spiritual image; but no man, from Nicodemus — who staggered over the mystery — up to this hour, ever comprehended the way of its opera tion. Life, light, heat, gravitation, magnetism, electricity, mental force, all beyond our compre hension ; and yet every one of them working on the plane of the natural. How, then, can spirit ual things, whose realm is in the supernatural only, — however it may subordinate and mould all nature to its uses, — how shall these be made easy for reason to grasp, or intellect to fathom? With the frivolities of a fastidious and intellectual sophistication, with the ironies and mockeries of an epicurean criticism, with the bitter scorn often concealed beneath an affectation of candor, — with INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. IOI none of these have we any patience, sympathy, or communion. Their well-bred affectations are but the concealments of an infidelity growing out of the rank soil of a profligate life. There is a secret hope, that man is without God in the world ; that scientific facts may at length dissolve this faith of the ages, and carry the sanctions of moral and spiritual law away with it. There is exulta tion in the ranks of these scorners when any new development seems to make inroads upon the verbal accuracy of the record? Vain and delu sive hope ! shallow and baseless exultation ! They are not looking for truth, but for confirma tion of a lie held fast in the right hand. "Their unbelief is not the product of reason, the upshot of an argument, or the result of a determined controversy. No : this infidelity or atheism or pantheism, which walks the streets with a noise less camel-tread, breathing in the ear from be hind, — this rife infidelity is the natural outspeak of intellectual and scientific sophistication, and of that relish for frivolous and forbidden pleasures, which renders the tastes fastidious, lulls the moral consciousness, falsifies the social affections, and so perverts the reasoning faculty that evidence produces an effect in an inverse ratio to its actual 102 THE DIVINE-HUMAN IN THE force. What then? Will the Bible be shorn of its power, and lose for ever the hold of its grasp on the fear and faith of the nations? Will men no more confide in God's Fatherhood, or Christ's love, or the Spirit's comfort? Will the sinner no more repent, the saint no more rejoice ? Will the bow of glory that spans the death-bed, dissolve like the iris when the sun is set, and the Immortal Hopes, that stand like white- winged angels at the tomb's portals, fold their pinions and steal away for ever? Is the earth, with all its busy populations, "to swing blind and blackening in the rayless air"? God forbid! Never! no, never ! Clothed though it be in a human vesture, like the Saviour of its prediction and its history, it is yet the wisdom of God and the power of God unto salvation. It shall take its effect upon hu man nature in all its diversities and manifesta tions ; gentle as the dew, germinant as the rain, irresistible as the fiat of Omnipotence ; for that which has gone forth out of his mouth shall not return unto him void. High above the range of all that is beautiful in philosophy, wonderful in science, refining in art, controlling in morals, authoritative in law, imperative in legislation, — INCARNATE AND WRITTEN WORD. 103 goes sounding through the ages the potent whis pers of the still, small voice. What the thunder, and the tempest, and the wild winds, could not do, it will accomplish. They can only smite and kill and destroy. But this, this only, can re create and harmonize, exalt and glorify ; building up nations, as well as men, on the stabilities of truth and virtue, stronger always as they hold more firmly to the record in which lie couched, yet luminous, the eternal verities of God. SOME THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. SOME THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. PART I. 2 Cor. v. 15: "And he died for all, that they which live should not henceforth live unto themselves, but unto him which died for them, and rose again." r I "HE grand power of the Cross is its motive power. It operates to save men by no mag ical process of necromancy or legerdemain, but by its influence upon their lives and characters. As the healing of the bitten Israelite in the wil derness was not simply in the serpent lifted up, but by the faith in God's word with which he re garded it ; so the cross of Christ has its healing and cleansing from the bite of sin, by the faith and love in the soul which looks to it ; for " as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so also shall the Son of man be lifted up, that who soever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life;" "and I, if I be lifted up, 108 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT will draw all men unto me." It is through be lieving, and by being drawn to Christ, that his death operates to save; it is, therefore, only as men are found believing, and exhibiting the fruits of faith, that Christ's work takes effect in and upon them. It must be remembered also in this connection, and when speaking of the cross of Christ, that whatever part or feature of his work is at any time spoken of, it is usually inclusive of the whole. Thus the cross, the death, the blood, the sufferings, the incarnation of Christ, epitomize and represent the whole redemptive economy, — all that he was or did or suffered, from his con ception to his crown ; from his infancy in Bethle hem's manger to his exaltation at the right hand of God in the heavens. Sometimes one feature of his life or office- work or sacrifice, falls in more appropriately and appositely to illustrate and enforce the theme in hand, and sometimes another ; as in that season of the year, and amidst those solemnities which celebrate his infancy at Christmas, all those incidents which go to make our ideal of a beautiful childhood, as well as the amazing condescension of God in humanity, are most useful and fitting. And so every incident in his career has in fact a twofold significance, — OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 109 one as it manifests the love of God to us, and the other as it calls for a corresponding love in us, and by us ; and showing how the devout and the practical are but parts and different showings of the same life of God in the human soul. As Adam was the first man in the flesh, so Christ is made the second Adam "as a quickening spirit." As Moses was prophet and mediator be tween God and his people, so Christ, like unto Moses, is made the mediator of a new covenant, founded on better promises. As Aaron was high priest, to offer gifts and sacrifices ; so Christ, at the end of the world, at the consummation of the ancient and ritualistic economy, offered himself once for all, and became at once both priest and sacrifice. As the outspread wings of the cheru bim and the golden plate covered the propitiatory or " mercy-seat " above the ark, so Christ becomes our Propitiatory, covers, remits, pardons our sins through the faith we exercise in him. And so he is the Captain of our salvation, by whose aid and skill we conquer ; our Exemplar, whose work and spirit we are to imitate ; our Prophet, to whose words of warning we are to listen. And so, when the deeper springs of gratitude and sympathy are to be touched, the immeasurable splendors of his IIO THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT Godhead are contrasted with the lowliness and weakness and sorrow and sacrifice of his earthly career; taking upon him our nature, made under the law, subject to all the afflictions and punitive evils which encompass humanity, shrinking from no scorn, no sorrow, no sacrifice, no suffering, not even death itself, that so he might get himself beneath our deepest degradation, in the intimacy of a Godlike sympathy and the power of a God like exaltation. And so, when his apostles preached "Jesus and the resurrection," it was Jesus before the world, in the world, beyond the world. And so when that cross was lifted up, it was the same cross planted in God's heart from the eternities ; for it is only by a cross of sacrifice that the sting of sin can be removed, and that cross borne on the bleeding shoulders of God. Oh, this dread mystery of sacrifice and suffering ! Yet out of it are the issues of life everlasting. Is God impassive ? Is he not full of affection, and so, by the necessities of his nature, in s}rmpathy and feeling for every wandering and godless soul. And this brings into prominence the first an nouncement of the Apostle, " He died for all." His death, and the manner of it, was so marked an event in his career, that it might well be used, OLDER THAN THE CREEDS- III and carry with it the weight and significance of ? all that preceded, and all that followed. So the resurrection is often used in the same connection, and any exposition is narrow and unsound that limits either to the mere verbal expression. Death is the usual termination of man's connection with time, and all the events that occur under the sun ; and if that death is connected with, or results from, the preparation of a whole life, which has been passed in equipment to make it a heroism or a sacrifice, we may well give a prominence to the death ; for the issues of the whole life are gath ered there. All the study, all the toil, the self- denial, culture, training, schooling, devotion, sacrifice, — the whole life and character, — are condensed and crowded into this great heroism, come out in eternal bloom in this one transcend ent issue. And so the patriot who lays down his life in battle for his country ; and so the philan thropist, whose toils and efforts are one long death while he lives in hospitals and sicknesses ; and so the servant of Christ who renounces all the world can proffer, and dies, like Heber and the noble army of ancient martyrs, that the glad tidings may reach the dead in sin, — all in their measure crown a life of consecration and nobility, by lay- 112 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT ing it on the altar of humanity and of God. Christ's death, or redemptive work, was for all : it was for humanity, for the race. It had, and could have, no exclusiveness in its own nature. It was fitted to work the same blessed effects in every human heart and life ! " As face answers to face in a glass, so the heart of man to man : " what destroys sin and begets faith in one, destroys sin and begets faith in another, and Christian experience, the world over, verifies this. If it is not effective upon all, it is not that it is inappro priate, but that it is not embraced. Nor are any provisions of God wasted ; for one soul needs the full power that is in them, and the world aggre gately needs no more. What is it but God's ter rible oath, that he has " no pleasure in the death of the sinner," but will pardon, yes, has already pardoned him, if he will repent and believe? It is his proclamation of amnesty to a world of rebels. It is for every one who has renounced his alle giance to God. " Come unto me, all ye ends of the earth, and be ye saved, for I am God : " is the proclamation wasted and void, if all that hear fail to come? Not only is it true that Christ's mission and work was for all, but the mode is also disclosed OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 13 of how it is to be made effective in and upon us. Now was the fit occasion, if ever, for Paul to lay the sure foundations of scholastic soteriology ; he was on the high theme of Christ's vicarious suf ferings and death. He comprehended the whole race of Adam within the designed benefits of that amazing sacrifice. Why was it necessary? what was it for? were the great questions pressing directly upon his attention. Now when he speaks he will surely anticipate the dogmatic theology of modern orthodoxy ; he will discourse of God's vengeance duly glutted in the cross, or Justice satisfied and sheathing her bloody sword, of sin ners enough chosen and purchased by their exact equivalent in agony. Surely, he will tell of the covenant of works with Adam, and federal head ships, and all of Adam's posterity sinning in him, and imputations of criminality against the fact. Now was the appropriate opening for settling for ever these high questions, and putting all disbe lievers in the governmental and commercial sys tems for ever to silence. If the facts were s.o, it was a high misdemeanor, not to say crime, in the apostle to let such an occasion for righting the world slip by. But hear him, " and that he died for all," "that" what? that Justice might be satis- 114 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT fied in wreaking the penalties of sin on him? No ! " but that his death might wring the inherent selfishness out of the human heart, might be made the motive force of a new and unselfish life, "that they which live should not henceforth {i.e., after being made acquainted with this great fact) live unto themselves, but unto him that died for them, and rose again. What a wonderful sim plicity and beauty in all this ! And how God works in and through man in accordance with the law of the human mind and soul ! As if he had said, naturally every man lives to and for him self and seeks his own. Men are miserable and sinful because and as they get into this condition of selfish isolation, gathering about them and theirs what of wealth and comfort and honors and ease and fashion they can clutch, and build ing walls of adamant between their hearts and the broken hearts of their suffering fellow-men? Now stop, immortal man, and see the wickedness as well as folly of all this. " Go to now, ye rich men," &c. What will you do when God deals with you as with Job, strips you naked, stirs up your nest, and gives to the howling hurricane the bed of down where your young were nestled? What then will come of selfish isolation but an- OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 15 guish and despair? The sympathy and love of mankind are your only hold upon your race : cut these ligaments, and you float a waif upon life's currents, the sport and orphanage of nature ; for even God rejects a heart devoid of all feeling for its kindred, for "if a man love not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen." Every thing about you is organized for a different result, — home, society, the body-politic, — all penetrated through and through by a principle of mutual dependence and relationship. Selfishness is suicide, stabbing your own soul. It is at war with all that is wisest and best in your own reason and conscience. It is a mean, miserly, cowardly quality, without dignity, respectability, or manhood. And now, if nothing else can move you, look at that cross, and him who suffered on it; who for our sakes became poor, that we through his poverty might be rich ; who humbled himself, &c, that, through and by all those overpowering motives which such devo tion and sacrifice awaken, you may likewise learn the great secret of spiritual power that dwells in sacrifice, and live henceforth not unto yourself, but unto Him that died for you and rose again. This is a leverage more powerful than Il6 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT that of Archimedes; for it lifts the world, holds it, like gravity, in harmonious circuits round the great Sun of Righteousness. And now it may be observed, — i. That we are instrumentally affected, and brought into this law of sacrifice, by looking at the example of Christ. There is no cause for the alarm that some feel, lest we should degrade and discrown the Sariour by regarding him sim ply as our Pattern of all goodness, gentleness, sympathy, and love. No : the example he set before us was that we should follow it, and tread in his steps ; and so anxious was the apostle to follow him that he prayed that he might know even the "power of his resurrection, the fellow ship of his sufferings, being made conformable to his death." " Follow me," says he, " as I follow Christ." Why not an example to us? Was he not manifested to take away sin? and can those who war with principalities and powers do better and more valiantly than fight with the weaponry which Christ wielded, and arm themselves with the armor in which he conquered? Are we called to duty? Look to Him who marked the path of duty all the way from Jordan to Calvary with his blood. Are we called to have faith? Look at OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 17 Him who healed the sick, restored sight to the blind, fed the multitude, and walked the waves, through faith. Are we called to prayer? See the frequenter of the lone mountain-peak, where he uttered in the ear of God the plaints of his sorrowful soul. Are we called to self-denial? Think of the glory he laid by, that he might deny himself and take up his cross. Are we called to sacrifice? Who knows it, or ever knew it, as he did, even to the laying down of his life? To sympathy? "Touched with a sympathy within, he knows our feeble frame," &c. Ah ! was there ever an ideal so perfect, so safe, to follow, as this actual being? No other like him since the ages began, nor ever will be till their close ! What human model without its imperfections, its ex cesses, or its deficiencies ? If beautiful as a dream, yet, here or there, there is defect in form or atti tude or coloring. But this manifestation of God in humanity is a portrait on which humanity may gaze for ever without idolatry, and pattern after for ever without fear of rivalry. I shall be satis fied, says the Psalmist, when I awake in thy like ness, — Christ's likeness. What a beatitude of supernal beauty and delight ! 2. This selfishness is conquered, moreover, by Il8 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT the gratitude which the consideration of Christ's death and sacrifice awakens. There are natures upon whom the calls of duty fall powerless, who are restive under the discipline of rules and com mands, who rebel more fiercely as authority lifts her sword, but who melt in contrition and grati tude when they become conscious that a great boon has been conferred upon them without re quest, without knowledge even, — some dread calamity averted, of which they had no warning, and could not prevent; some wondrous benefit, coupled with sacrifices which were all unthought of, and are even now incomprehensible. How the heart heaves and labors as it takes it in ! Some young, beautiful, devoted mother, who gave her life for her child ; some friend enduring sick ness and penury, that another might have abun dance. Love does strange things, even among the lapsed children of sin. And now what has God done for us? Without our knowledge or asking, builded heaven with glory ineffable ; paving its streets with star-dust, and filling its temples with himself, that his people may rejoice, and throwing open its gates so wide that every prodigal may enter and live for ever. And when he feeds on the husks, shall he not say, " In my OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 19 Father's house is bread enough and to spare : I will arise and go to my Father?" and when he comes back he realizes, by faith, the forgiveness which precedes all spiritual comfort and all well- grounded hope ; and these are new and super added elements, by which the life of self is driven out, and the life of Christ implanted. Think you the pardoned prodigal, with the hot tears of his father's forgiving love yet warm upon his cheek, would go back to his wassail and want? Would not that forgiveness seal for ever, to the last throb of his repentant heart, the loy alty once lost, but now regained ; the sacrifice once scorned, but now desired, that he might soothe and comfort the heart he had once torn and outraged by his impiety? 3. And so God brings, in and over the renewed soul, a loyal and ready acquiescence in all those appointments designed to humble self, and devote the life in sacrifice to Christ and his little ones. Because more and more Christ lives in his people, it is a life not their own, and yet shaping and moulding theirs into its own image and likeness. It is not the apprehension of this great truth in tellectually or morally, but a divine life, entering into the heart, and building itself royally into the 120 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT character by its spiritual indwelling and sanctify ing power. It colors and ennobles thought and aspiration ; it stimulates ambition ; it impels to duty ; it wings praise like an archangel ; it opens heaven to the eye of faith, and sees all the glori fied train in full array, a cloud of witnesses to the goodness and faithfulness of God. And now let me say, that this outcasting and repression of self, and living unto and for him who died for us, in all modes of ready and willing sacrifice, is the great central law of God's moral and spiritual kingdom. Heaven itself is pillared on this law. God's empire is throned not more on sovereignty than on sacrifice. Love itself is sacrificial ; and God is love. The redemptive system sprang from the depths of the divine com passions ; and Christ himself was this manifested love. Read the throes of his Father's heart in all the tender pleadings and expostulations which come like a wail and lament from prophetic lips. "How can I give thee up, O Ephraim?" &c. Who has sacrificed more for man than God? All that men may do for each other bears no comparison to this, — the plan, the purpose, the means, the life, the teachings, the sorrow, the scorn, the cruelty, the death, the resurrection, OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 121 ascension, and advent of the Spirit, all the out come of that sacrificial love which runs like a golden thread through all God's dealings with our race, and fastened for ever to his great loving heart in heaven. And akin to this, and working side by side with it, is that other wide underlying principle which human selfishness is so slow to learn, — the ultimate gain of sacrifice, announced in those enigmatic words, " He that findeth his life shall lose it, and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it." He who pre fers his own comfort, enjoyment, ease, honor, to that of others, shall lose his life ; for if he is gratified in what he seeks, a selfish life is a life lost. But how generally do all these accumula tions slip from the grasp of the pursuer ! and then in the penury he feared, in the sorrow he would have avoided, in the dishonor and shame he could not think of facing, he reaps as he has sown, and suffers not simply loss, but damage fanged with the agonies of unavailing remorses. But a life lost in sacrifices, — there is a perennial bloom in that. Lost ! it is only the buried seed. It seems to die : hunger bites it, cold benumbs it, labor wearies it, watchings sap its strength, and the eye closes when its last look of love is given ; 122 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT but in that seed there is germinant and immortal life. It has even now sent up its stem to the clouds, and made all the heavens radiant with its coronal of glory ; while its delicious perfume goes up a sweet-smelling savor to God. Was a life of devotion and sacrifice ever lost? Never! No patriot on the battle-field, no soother of the dead and dying, no watcher by the sick man's pillow, no weeper over human woe, no enlight- ener of the ignorant, no guide to the benighted and wandering, ever lose their reward; not simply God's approval in the day of account, — which includes every thing truly, — but they leave a wake on the billows of time, they become a spiritual force in the mutabilities of society that can never be lost or die out. Some humble life seemingly lost lies long in the womb of history, like the grain three thousand years old in the tombs and pyramids ; but God giveth it a body as it pleases him : its resurrection hour will strike. And lo ! it springs up in flower and fruitage, that shall never wither or decay. History repeats it self in everlasting reproduction over all the realms of Christian sacrifice. Will the influence of Christ's sacrifice ever be lost? Is it now on the wane ? Can it ever know any alteration or abate- OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 123 ment? Shall it not stand forth with an influence hale and potent that shall outshine and outlive the stars? And so of every other sacrifice, pro vided only it be for Christ, not for whim or fancy, not to fly from the world, not for affectation or singularity ; but for an intelligent and honest love of the Great Sacrifice, who has disclosed to men, that this law of sacrifice is yet, in the highest sense, a law of recompense, — saving the life that is lost for his sake. How little has man in his wisdom comprehended of this deepest of all philosophies, — this gain in losing, this life in dying, this fruition in depriva tion, this wealth in poverty, this strength in weak ness, this having nothing yet possessing all things, — which informs and vivifies the whole round of Christian duties, and underlies the whole circle of Christian sacrifices ! And yet how prominent it stands in the forefront of those jubilant utter ances which break from the lips of Paul, as he recounts the loss and the gain of his apostolic warfare ! If the foregoing views may be relied on as correct, we see the folly of all those speculations upon the efficacy of Christ's work, which would limit it to an elected class, as though it would be 124 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT wasted and lost in part, if provided for all, }'et secured to few ; as though it was a transaction irrespective of man ; the payment of so much suffering for so many souls in a vulgar and com mercial sense, and only those were provided for who actually came, and God was insincere in offering life and salvation to every creature ; con signing to damnation those who rejected a Saviour never provided for them, and refusing a pardon never intended to be given. To this complexion comes this absurdity of a limited atonement, and a provision for the redemption only of God's elect. This scholastic heresy has been more highly dis honoring to God, and a fouler stumbling-block in the way of man's salvation, than all the scoffing and ribaldry that infidelity ever uttered. What limit was there to God's proclamation of pardon? None : it was wide as the woe it sought, and ample as God's unstinted love, could make it. "He died for all," says the apostle. Who dare contradict him, and say it was for part only of our lapsed humanity? No reason is hinted at in God's oracles for any necessities for this in the exigencies of the divine government, as some have imagined ; but everywhere it is made a moral and spiritual leverage to awaken the OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 25 humari consciousness to the fact of sin and re pentance, and so produce in man those moral dispositions which bring him within the gracious provisions of God's redemptive system, where he may be pardoned through faith, and enlightened and sanctified by the Spirit of truth. Christ came to reconcile man to God ; and his own life was part of this system of reconciliation, operating as we have seen upon the conscience and heart, to melt and mould it into his own image, through this law of unselfish sacrifice. " Oh, the depth both of the wisdom and knowledge of God ! " We see, moreover, that "living unto him who died for us and rose again," supposes in us prin ciples, and a character of virtue all our own; real virtue and true principles, not imputed where they have no existence in fact, but imputed be cause they have a real and substantial existence ; for God admits of no shams or pretences. His imputations are according to truth. He imputes sin where it is, and not where it is not. He im putes righteousness where it is, and not where it is not. There can be no transference of inno cence to guilt, nor of guilt to innocence : it would confound all moral distinctions and accountabili ties, and carry ruin and disorder through all ranks 126 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT and orders of being. A pardoned sinner, born of the Spirit, has in him the germs of a righteous ness which need but opportunity to evolve in a loyal and righteous life. And God accepts the principle, because the performance is embedded in it ; and this is the righteousness of Christ, cr Christ's mode or plan of making a sinner right eous, — not the personal righteousness of Christ, transferred over and imputed to the sinner as his, as some ignorantly teach and believe ; but the sinner's own righteousness, yet assisted in its growth and development by the presence and power of the indwelling Christ. This whole scholastic doctrine of imputation, as taught in some schools of theology, is the veriest moon shine of a distempered fancy ever conceived in the brain of dreamers, who daub the fair temple of God with untempered mortar. Christ a sinner, — God stained with human guilt, — not in fact, but by pretence and imputation, that the universe may see how justly he was punished on the cross, for sins which that same universe all the while knew he had never committed ! Can human audacity and blasphemy go further? We learn, moreover, that there never is, or was, or can be any conflict in the divine attributes OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 27 or counsels respecting us. God is one, and God is our Saviour. He sent his Son, who was the outcome of his Father's purpose and love ; and hence this imaginary conflict between Justice and Mercy — the one anxious to smite, and the other more anxious to spare — had no existence except in the heated brains of system-builders wiser than God. God is of one mind; who can turn him? and yet he is conceived often as if the Father had one mind, one heart, one will ; the Son, another heart, intelligence, and will ; and the Spirit likewise : and so we paganize Deity, and become tritheists and idolaters. As thinks and feels and wills the Father, so thinks and feels and wills the Son and the Holy Spirit. The in finite God is one, yet he is finited in a triune manifestation or personality, in condescension to human conception ; for thus only is God accom modated to our knowledge and needs. Let us reverently and anxiously inquire, What has Christ's work effected in our behalf? Has it wrought in us those blessed results, — conviction for our sin, repentance toward God, and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ, which will eliminate from our souls our native selfishness, and teach us henceforth to live not unto ourselves, but unto him who died for us, and rose again. 128 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT PART II. Micah vi. 6, 7, 8 : "Wherewith shall I come before the Lord, and bow myself before the high God? shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves of a year old? Will the Lord be pleased with thousand* of rams, and ten thou sands of rivers of oil? Shall I give my first-born for my transgression, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul? He hath showed thee, O man, what is good ; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?" Micah vii. 18, 19: "Who is a God like unto thee, that par- doneth iniquity, and passeth by the transgression of the rem nant of his heritage? he retaineth not his anger for ever, because he delighteth in mercy. He will turn again, he will have compassion upon us; he will subdue our iniquities; and thou wilt cast all their sins into the depth of the seas." HP HE inquiry of the 6th verse, "Wherewith shall I come before the Lord ? " was the cry of humanity, the world over, ever since the idea of a Supreme Being became lodged in its intel ligent consciousness. The constitution and course of nature bespeak a great First Cause or Causes, and the vicissitudes of human life, and the flow of historic events, a governing and providential power, whose purposes are omnipotent, and whose OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 29 ways are past finding out. Disease, calamity, death, track man with a certainty no skill can baffle, and no wisdom foresee. But whether this dreadful power be beneficent or demoniac, whether the embodiment of goodness or of wrath, baffles inquiry ; for sometimes in the guise of one, and again in that of the other, do the heavens smile and the thunders roar. And so the old Persian magi deduced the idea of a dual force, two gods antagonistic; each divine, yet one diabolic; one the object of love, — being love itself, — the other to be soothed and placated by offerings and sacri fices, to allay his ire, and hold in abeyance his vengeance. And gradually the idea of a su preme beneficence faded out of the pagan heart, and their worship degenerated into a system of sanguinary and disgusting demonology ; their gods, the most loathsome and frivolous idols of wood and stone, four-footed beasts and creeping things, hideous mockeries of humanity, — Bel and Nebo, Dagon, Ashtaroth, Moloch, — whose altars smoked with human victims, captives taken in war, or children dedicated to the god. And so ideal gods, as in Greece, supplanted these grosser and sensuous demons, as a more refined taste and imagination succeeded these earlier and ruder I30 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT distortions of fear. But while demonology be came more classical and poetic, it retained all its cruelty, and demanded the dearest idols of the heart for its sanguinary altars. And so the Ro man gathered his Pantheon, or assemblages of the gods ; and the Gaul, Scandinavian, Briton, and Druid bowed, to the mandate of the priest, at the demon's shrine ; and thus even in Mexico, where no tradition of a sacrifice had reached, " the Aztec priest upon the teocallis beat the wild war-drum made of serpent's skin," while up the vast sides of that mount of sacrifice wound the frantic devotees, that upon their ancient altar- stone might flow, in crimson floods, the blood of young men and maidens. Do we not remember the beautiful and pathetic lines of Tennyson, called "The Victims," in which this pagan demonology is embodied? What marvel, then, that God's chosen people, surrounded and touched at every point by this pervading demonology, should at length come to regard the God of Abraham (Jehovah) as embodying the same wrath principle in his nature, and as demanding his sacrifices, by way of satisfaction or appeasement, like the gods of the heathen; nay, not only so, but should cause their own children to pass through the fires OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 13 1 of Moloch, and give their sons and their daughters in expiation of their sins, — the fruit of their body for the sin of their soul ! It was the fact and the practice of this which put the inquiry into the prophet's lips. It was the inquiry of pagan fear, without God; and the answer was, "Yes: he is pleased with burnt offerings and calves of a year old, with thousands of rams, and ten thousands of rivers of oil. Give the fruit of your body for the sin of your soul : it will buy his favor, earn his forgiveness, satisfy his wrath or justice. He can be propitiated only with blood." But God looked down upon this dreadful perversion and mockery of his economy, — which, when truly apprehended, indicated ever the cleansing and homage of the worshipper, offering him no satis faction for sin, but only an acknowledgment of gratitude that provision was made for its forgive ness without money or price, — and through the prophet's lips rang out, upon such baseness and recreancy, the blasts of his vehement and burn ing indignation. "For when ye offer your gifts, when ye make your sons to pass through the fire, ye pollute yourselves with all your idols even unto this day : and shall I be inquired of by you, O house of Israel? As I live, saith the Lord God, 132 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT I will not be inquired of by you." Ezekiel xx. 31. — "Bring no more vain oblations: your new moons and your sabbaths, your calling of assem blies, I cannot away with ; it is iniquity, even the solemn meeting. And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide mine eyes from you ; yea, when ye make many prayers I will not hear : your hands are full of blood." Isaiah i. 13-15. Even the blood of their own children ! At the advent of our Saviour, surrounding paganism had lost none of its horrors, nor allayed any of its thirst for blood. The Jew, after his return from cap tivity, was not the same open idolater as before ; but he did not the less prostitute the forms and ceremonies given by Moses to purposes and ends they were never intended to subserve. He col ored them with the perversion of a pagan diabo lism, on the one hand ; or degraded their beautiful and significant types into a paltry and frivolous ritualism of phylacteries and robes, of bands and tippets, of days and times and new moons, of mint and rue and cummin, so often and so severely rebuked by our Lord, who never once in the course of his ministry alluded directly to this idea of divine satisfactions or expiations for sin. Yet the doctrine he taught concerning the being and OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 133 nature of God, especially his Fatherhood, and the way of salvation pointed out in the parables of the unforgiving servant and of the Prodigal Son, cut up root and branch, then and for ever, the whole theory of satisfactions and equivalents as effectually as if he had made it the theme of distinct and specific reprobation, because it cut away, in the doctrine of God's Fatherhood, the whole foundation of diabolism, on which the theory of expiation was founded. The placation of demons rested upon expiations, — the fruit of the body for the sin of the soul. But the Prodi gal's loving Father needed no satisfactions to himself or his justice, but only the satisfaction of pouring over his repentant and returning prod igal the unstinted ocean of his forgiveness. What mockery to talk of equivalents for love, — the love of a father or mother's heart, much more that of God's ! Neither the word nor the idea of satisfactions to justice or God, as a motive or ground of forgiveness, occurs in the New Testa ment. The idea is a contradiction, or felo de se, as I shall show further on. For the first three centuries, the church was struggling for toleration and life, and had little leisure to attack the specific and gigantic errors which prevailed in the pagan 134 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT nations around her ; and when afterwards she came to settle her articles of faith, and propose her dogmatic creeds, she found that this same pagan element was largely incorporated with, and blended in, the Hebraistic Christianism, that looked upon Christ as the fulfilment literally of every type of the Jewish economy, which the church had come to regard as foreshadowing sat isfactions and expiations, which, although not to be seen anticipatively, might be found in the light of retrospection, — visible by the stern lights of history, though not to be seen from the bow. And so, for twelve hundred years more, it matters little what the church taught, or what councils decreed, or popes or cardinals or monks preached, until the voices of the Reformation broke upon the ear of Europe, and loud protests rang over the hills of Germany and England against the abuses and despotisms of the prelacy, and the errors of the papal power. Many glaring evils were at tacked ; many noble principles were established, — a free Bible, the right of private judgment, justification by faith : but many errors were not yet seen to be such in the dim light of those morning hours. Luther, Calvin, Erasmus, Me- Ianchthon, Zwingle, saw men as trees walking. OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 35 They were not agreed on many things now deemed essential : they united on many points now deemed erroneous. " Soteriology, or the doctrine of Christ's satisfaction of divine justice for human sin, was never established in the sym bols of dogmatic theology until the middle of the sixteenth century," says Professor Shedd, in his "History of Christian Doctrine." We do not deem it yet established, with all deference to the learned professor ; on the contrary, what there ever was of it is now crumbling and ready to vanish away. Men usually have their ideas colored by the institutions and style of thought most prevalent and popular in the age in which they live ; and hence the views of the leaders and thinkers of the Reformation on the attributes and govern ment of God necessarily took the type and im-- press of the governments among men with which they were familiar. These were simple unmixed despotisms, both in State and Church. Francis I. in France, Charles V. in Spain and as emperor of Germany ; Henry VIII. in England, the Great Anglican Pope ; Leo X. in Italy, temporal king there, and spiritual potentate everywhere, — all reigning by right divine and the grace of God, 136 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT which meant, as Motley says, "the steel-gloved fist." The only prevailing idea of government at all, was that of God's anointed ones ruling des potically, and for their own pleasure and glory, in the State and in the Church. Autocracy, civil and ecclesiastical, stood like a mail-clad giant, and swayed over Europe his sword of vengeance and of doom. Only here and there, in the Swiss Alps, were there signs of restiveness against the tyranny of Savoy, as the echo of those peaks were awakened by the cry for liberty. What marvel, then, that God's sovereignty, and God's decrees, and God's glory and will, should stand prominently forth in the fields of theology, as that of the king and the pope did in the theatre of man's civil and political relations? On the last, the people were nothing but puppets in the fingers of the king and the priest, to be squeezed at their pleasure for gain or glory. And so, on the first, man, as the subject of govern ment, was regarded simply as a being created to stand by his sovereign's will in certain govern mental relations, interwoven in a scheme of divine policies, in which his personal good and happi ness were no more concerned than that of a wheel or cog in the ongoing of a vast and com- OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 137 plicated machine. Systematic divinity and God's glory were supposed to swallow the whole man, and make it necessary " that he should be willing to be damned that he might be fit to be saved." Calvin's Christian Institutes stand Upon the twin- pillars of decrees and sovereignty, doctrines well enough in some aspects, but held out of all rela tion to other cognate and equally important truths. Entertaining these views of the absoluteness of God as a moral governor, sharpened by the severi ties with which he punished the Israelites for their sin ; and regarding it as their function {i.e. the Reformers), to comprehend and be satisfied with the principles upon which that moral administra tion was conducted, so that no damage should accrue to the stabilities of his wide outlying em pire of spiritual powers, by a supposed conni vance at sin, if it be seen to be too easily for given, — this figment of divine satisfaction to justice in the person of Christ was invented, that it might be known through the wide universe, that, in this mysterious way, " God was a just God, and yet a Saviour ; " and that, on the cross, sin was at once punished and forgiven. Very crude and strange reasoners, some of these early fathers ! The first thing that strikes us, in look- 138 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT ing at this scheme, is its inconsistency with the scheme of sovereignty we have just considered, — a sovereignty which carries on its forefront the undisputed right, without question by man or angel, to have mercy upon whom he will have mercjs and to harden whom he will. And yet dogmatic divinity feared for the stability of the moral universe, and the integrity of the loyal orders of his empire ; that all would lapse into one wild weltering chaos of rebellion, unless it could be made manifest that justice was satisfied, and punishment for sin meted out to somebody : God's sovereignty held to be so absolute that no being had a right to question it, at one moment ; and, at the next, so weak that it must explain the how and the why, and pour over its doings the lustre of self-vindication before a trembling sinner will accept the richest boon it can give him. " A convicted sinner," says Professor Shedd, "cannot accept forgiveness unless he sees it is offered in a way not to infringe the government of God." Did the prodigal refuse forgiveness until he first called for an explanation, and was satisfied that it could be accorded with safety to the principles of his father's government? What theological drivel this, — putting the most royal bestowments OLDER THAN THE CREEDS- 139 of sovereignty to the humiliating task of justify ing its purposes and acts to the finite satisfaction of a being it saved from ruin everlasting, whose poverty it relieved, and whose guilt it pardoned ! God's infinite being and government on trial, before the culprit who had all along defied and disregarded both, that he might first be convinced that no damage would come to either, if he con descended to accept of the mercy they freely offered him ! Could human insolence and auda city go further? And yet this is precisely the position in which this fiction of governmental sat isfactions leaves this infinitely important question. And as to the supposed influence of this punish ment of Christ for human sin, upon the loyal hosts of heaven, if they have looked into this mystery far enough they have learned the truth. Nor is their steadfastness to rest in shams and subterfuges. They know full well that it was man that sinned, and that to man God had said, "The soul that sinneth it shall die." They knew also that Christ was sinless. What, then, must be the horror and consternation, carrying a thrill of agony through all those shining ranks, to see God's own Son — the brightness of his Father's glory, and the express image of his person ; nay, 140 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT God himself manifest in the flesh — punished on the cross for sins he never committed, and suf fering the equivalent of a world's damnation, that he might satisfy the penalties of a law he never violated? Well might they be dismayed, and inquire anxiously, Where are the stabilities of moral government? what is justice? and what is law and what is truth ? in such a system of insta bilities and surprises. If they ask, How does this satisfy violated law? they are told that Christ, being sinless, assumed, or pretended to be guilty of, human sin in the aggegate, — of all sins committed up to his day, and of all sin now committed and to be committed to the end of time, — and, taking them all upon his soul, expiated their guilt, and so opened a way for God's forgiveness of the sinner. This aban dons for ever the idea of executing penal satis factions upon the sinner, but transfers the stress of their demands to a substitute. But this only evades, without satisfying, legal penalties : the law is foiled in its vindicatory demands, and is as really defrauded by a theory of substitution which it did not contemplate, as by forgiveness simply without this ecclesiastical apparatus. But it will be seen further, that this whole theory of substi- OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 141 tution has no foundation in the principles of moral government. It is utterly impossible, a theologi cal dodge and cheat. Penal enactments, to be such in reality, must reach and correct the party offending. The exact thing threatened must be done, else there is no terror in the frown of pen alty. If it can be shifted off upon another, and the sin cherished, while the penalty crushes an other, and that other guiltless, it is simple mock ery to talk of law under such a system. Law carries vindication in its teeth, and thinks it foul scorn to wreak its retributions where sin has not grown its harvests. Nay, neither Truth nor Justice permit law to reap where sin has not sown, nor gather where it has not strewed. It is demon strable, moreover, that, in a spiritual system, there is but one mode of separating penalty from crime ; and that is by repentance of the sin, and the forgiveness of the sinner : otherwise, a pre mium is placed on violation of law, by turning over its retributions upon some soul willing to bear them. There is enough of this now in the great law of sacrifice, which makes sin a mystery of evil to all connected, being without turning its consequences into penalties, and severing these from the soul that breeds them. Can you shrivel 142 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT your hand in the consuming flame, and your ' neighbor only feel the burn, and you be harm less? Can you riot in debauchery for years, and your temperate friend stand forth to society a drunkard and vagabond, and you be pure and guiltless? Can you commit the sin, and he bear the penalty? Never! The penalty inheres in the sin ! Spiritual death is in the transgression, and not elsewhere, and can be avoided only by the putting away of sin. And now behold another marvel of scholastic divinity, to get rid of this first monstrous assump tion of substitution ! Christ, it is said, not only assumed our place to suffer penalty, but our guilt, and so suffered justly ; so dying, to satisfy justice ! It is simply shocking to speak of such blas phemies; an I yet they are taught, in our theo- logic schools, as the pillars of Christian ortho doxy ; and the mind that shudders over them is supposed not to be sound on the atonement. This idea was invented, because it was seen that the simple theory of substitution, the innocent for the guilty, would shock the moral sense so rudely that it would fail of acceptance unless a rider was thrown on to hold it ; to wit, that Christ was actually guilty of our sins : not in fact (they OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 143 dared not assert this) , but by assumption or . pre tence or imputation ; that somehow he was justly chargeable with them, while at the same time his personal holiness became, by a like mystery, im puted or carried over to his people, on the principle of cross-remainders. Sin, we are assured, is the transgression of law. It is the personal act of a free voluntary agent. There are sins of igno rance ; these, in a spiritual system, God winks at, so to speak. But the sins we daily and delib erately commit, will these metaphysicians tell us how the sin or guilt of them is capable of trans ference? By what psychological process can it be done? The intent of one mind, in the doing of a prohibited act, passed over as the actual in tent of a different mind, which at the same time was actually unconscious of the intent so supposed to be transferred ; so that by such transference it becomes a sin and guilt in the innocent recipient, deserving of damnation, — is this theology or insanity? Still it was not so hard to swallow by men who believed that all human generations, to the end of time, were actually present and sinned in Adam, and if infants are left to perish, it is the just penalty of personal sin. We have mostly repudiated this lighter heresy as infamous , 144 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT to the greater, orthodoxy we cling as a sheet an chor. But has it ever been considered how a God of truth and justice could punish his Son for sins of which he was not in fact, but only assumed to be, guilty? How does this satisfy justice? Or is justice a blinded demon, that only demands so much suffering and blood, and cares not where it comes from ? What is justice but God's mode of dealing justly with his angels and men? How, then, is justice satisfied by piling agony upon innocence, that guilt may go free? It is con founding all moral distinctions, and rolling back the universe into chaos. Such a procedure, while it subserves no governmental purpose, either of sovereignty or divine vindication, is the rankest conceivable injustice, cruelty, crime, and would be tolerated as a rule of action in no civil govern ment under heaven. It is worse than barbarism ; for it is barbarism under the name and aping the prerogatives of the sublimest celestial wisdom and virtue. Did any of these wiseacres who insist in piling human guilt upon the soul of Christ tell us when it was taken off? Could he repent of it and so be forgiven? No ! Could it be cleansed by expiation and suffering ? This is impossible, because guilt is never removed by ex- OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 45 piation : the enforcement, to the letter, of the severest retributions, never extirpates the guilt of the offender. After the prison has ejected him as before, after the gallows has claimed him as before, — the stain is in the soul with all its crimson dyes, untouched by the satisfied pen alties of law. The law is never satisfied or made honorable by the infliction of its threatenings, else hell, to the law, is as satisfactory as heaven ; and disobedience, with punishment, as desirable as loyalty. No : law is dishonored whenever the penalty is enforced, as well as when it is unen forced. Law is honored only in the observance of the precept, and so Christ magnified the law and made it honorable by his obedient and loving life, in doing the will of his Father ; in the sinless perfection of a character that stands for ever as a marvel and model of the grand possibilities of manhood, under a law not too strict for a sinless and God-given nature ; testifying thus " that the law was holy, and the commandment holy and just and good." I am aware that theologians for the last forty years, connected with what is called the new school of divinity, have attempted to modify this revolting doctrine so far as to hold, that although Christ was man's proper and real I46 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT substitute to suffer for sin, yet that he could not have endured the penalty of the law, nor have been chargeable with our guilt by assumption or otherwise. Because, first, the penalty of sin was eternal death, the remorses of a guilty conscience, and such like ingredients of torture, which Christ never experienced. And, again, his holy nature made it impossible that he could really be charged with guilt; "but," in the lan guage of Dr. Barnes, in his celebrated sermon on the "Way of Salvation," " he endured so much suffering, bore so much agony, that the Father was pleased to accept of it in the place of the eternal torments of all that should be saved by him." But a moment's reflection will discover this to be a double cheat of Justice, who needs to be blind when theology is in question. For, first, he is cheated of his proper victim, by slipping a third party in his place; and, again, he is de frauded in his penalty, by substituting sufferings which the Father is pleased to accept as equiva lent, or a consideration sufficient for all who should be saved. Who does not see that the sovereignty that could alter by a hair's-breadth the denounced penalty, either as to victim or suf ferings, could just as easily dispense with the OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 47 whole? Nor is disobedience any more tolerated in the one case than in the other. Was an im penitent soul ever yet deterred from sin by con sidering that Christ had paid its penalty or its equivalent? Never ! such a thought has no moral force on human obduracy ; the governmental rela tions supposed in the case, never yet touched a human soul : they have no adaptation to such a result. It is God's law and God's love that are " the schoolmasters to bring us to Christ," not the nice balancing of toil and torture against the worth of so many souls ; plunging the sword just so deep, and smiting with just the fierceness which should counterbalance the salvation of just the number who shall finally slip from the devil's gripe and escape the wrath to come. And the monstrous horror in- this case, as in the other, consists in the assertion, that while the Father knew, and the whole universe knew, the Son to be perfectly innocent, immaculate as God, nay, the very incarnation of God, that his, the Father's, burning wrath, real, honest, lay upon the soul of Christ, as if he truly believed he had merited and deserved the punishment due to sin ; and all this astounding tragedy, at which the earth rocked and the sun veiled his splendor, had its origin in 148 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT a series of pretences, deceptions, and unrealities, utterly unaccountable to reason, and without a particle of warrant in the Word of God. Calvary a tragic sham ! innocence treated as guilt by infinite wisdom ! holiness tortured as sin by infinite justice ! person and penalty altered by infinite truth ! forgiveness tendered after the debt is satisfied by infinite sovereignty ! God of mercy, what a blasting caricature of every divine at tribute ! And now, when these theologic doctors come to sum up the value and efficacy of the atone ment, while they insist it was principally in the "blood" or "death" of the victim, they still feel compelled to attribute some merit to the dignity of the sufferer ! Yet they deny that deity suf fered, but only held up the humanity of Christ, that it might be able to bear the full blasts of the divine fury against sin, itself standing aside, ex cept in the way of support. Without stopping to inquire by what rule suffering buys or earns favor from the party inflicting the blows, — its principal benefit being always deemed subjective to the party suffering,- — it is matter of profound wonder how, on the principle of exchange, barter, and substitution, such value can be given to Christ's OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 149 blood or death, as to merit and weigh down the salvation of the whole Church of God, from the days of Abel until the sounding of the final trump. For, after all, it is only the Son of man who dies. God did not die ; God could not die : terrible as the cross truly was, it is Humanity that is crucified. "But," says Owen, vol. v. p. 389, "the worth of the atonement is external to it, doth not arise from it, but merely depends upon the intention and will of God ; " in other words, after all this play of imputations and cross-pur poses ; after all this theological thimble-rigging ; these shifts and contrivances ; this stretching up into the heavens to construct governmental props to God's throne, for fear his empire might suffer untimely disruption ; after all the doctrinal neces sities, which have filled hundreds of tomes to set them forth, — the grand machinery has no in trinsic merit, efficacy, or adaptation fer se to its purposes and ends, but rests solely on the will of God, without which it is valueless. The whole scheme, from root to bud, resting in the divine purpose, referred back to the sovereignty of God, which might therefore have dispensed with the whole of it, and saved men as the New Testament declares on the simple conditions of faith and 150 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT repentance. "To this complexion has it come at last." The governmental theory breaks down, in the very instant its top-stone is raised with shoutings ; and the whole superstructure lies a mass of ruins and rubbish, only as it is put in order and made subservient to the purposes of the divine sovereignty! "Why, then, did Christ die?" sa}^ the trembling believer, who has never thought upon his subject, as though no death of one for another could be vicarious and sacrificial, unless it was also penal, substitutional, and expi atory ! Why did he die ! Because, being human, he must pass from the earth through the gate of death, that by his resurrection, as the first-fruits of them that slept, he might give to his people the pledge of his divinity, and the assurance that they also should conquer death, and rise again to be ever with the Lord. Why did he die ! Be cause the redemptive economy were incomplete if any element it now comprehends had been lacking. Why was he born? why baptized? Why did he teach and heal? why did he weep and suffer? why did he fast and pray? why falsely ac cused and scourged ? — why any of it, as well as why the death? One was no less expiatory than the other. He lived and taught to satisfy justice OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 151 as really as he died. It was the crowning work, as the resurrection was the completion, of his mission; and then, when we come to look at its influence upon humanity, how sublimely it lifts itself above all these scholastic systems we have been considering, and becomes the "wisdom of God and the power of God unto salvation ! Truly he lived for me, he died for me, says the penitent soul. Without him and all of him, every jot and tittle of his work, no soul of man would have been saved. The precise motives which his mis sion affords, especially in the giving his life to its completion, are the only motives which the wis dom of God ever devised to penetrate a sin- stained soul with the consciousness of its guilt and misery. How great is sin, if such an agency alone can counteract and kill it ! How eminent the danger, if such means alone can avert it ! How blessed is God, if, at such cost and humilia tion and blood, he comes after the lost ones of his empire, and sends them messages of affection and forgiveness ! This — this is the power of the cross, — the cross seen by the sinner's eye in the heart of God ; the cross borne on the bosom of Christ from the eternities, carried through all his weary days of watching and sorrow, and 152 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT crimsoned with his blood, as the epoch of God's purposes of mercy rolled on to their sublime ac complishment. No power in the cross but that of expiation ! Then you have never seen " God in Christ reconciling the world unto himself," using it as a redemptive agency, entering into the deepest springs and sources of human sympathy and contrition, and breaking the obduracy of sin by the gentleness of its tender and touching avouchments. Shall I bring an expiatory offer ing to God, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul ? No ! no ! leave that to the followers of Dagon and Juggernaut : " For who is a God like unto him, that pardoneth iniquity, and passeth by the transgression of the remnant of his heri tage, who retaineth not his anger for ever because he delighteth in mercy." " Thou wilt subdue their iniquities, and cast all their sins into the depths of the sea." OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 153 PART III. " With his stripes we are healed." TN the examination given to this subject thus far, I have endeavored to show, that the idea of literal expiation was wholly of pagan origin, the promptings of fear to placate and appease its demons ; that the idea of substitutions of persons and penalties not contemplated in the law is even worse than the original dogma ; that it is a ma chinery that breaks down the moment it is set agoing, and neither vindicates law nor rebukes nor chastises sin ; that it tarnishes instead of vindicat ing God's honor ; that it involves moral contradic tions and impossibilities, and has no groundwork of necessity in the stabilities of government ; that, in fine, it turns the whole system of free grace upside down, by calling for purchasers, equiva lents, and satisfactions, so that God's free forgive ness of sin is only in seeming, as each soul was the result of a bargain or covenant, which had received its consideration on the cross, and while pardon was proclaimed, it was only, after all, the 154 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT fulfilment of pledges it were foul dishonor not to redeem and acknowledge. We might have shown further, that this notion of infinite supererogato^^ merit by the Saviour, laid up in the treasury of the Church, to be dispensed when and how the priest should determine in the shape of dispensa tions and indulgences, soon grew into such con venient enginery of sacerdotal authority that its voluntary relinquishment was not to be thought of. "But, after all," says the inquirer, "revolting as this doctrine seems to human reason, and im possible as it appears that it should subserve any governmental purpose, is it not in the first place a dictate of nature, and is it not further revealed as God's mode of salvation, and therefore to be accepted, whether it can be comprehended in all its bearings or not ; and has not God put the seal of his sanction to its truth, by the success which has attended its proclamation since the days of the Reformation?" ist. Then is the " satisfaction theory " a dictate of nature ; for it has been insisted by its advocates that, if so, it is a premonition and prophecy that it is of God. I have insisted on the fact, that it is an invention of man, — of fallen, degraded, degenerate humanity; that it is the outcome of OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 155 his terror and his guilt, the invention of a priest hood of demons, to whom God says, "Thou thoughtest that I was altogether such an one as thyself, but I will reprove thee." For what was God in the old paganisms but a tyrant, immensely enlarged and projected into the field of the in finite, a gigantic warrior, leader, king ; filled with all human passions, burning with all human wraths, ablaze with all forms of human ven geance, yet capable of appeasement and placa tion by such appropriate and costly satisfactions as his accredited vicegerents might prescribe. And this is the precise and all-sufficient reason why this whole theory is false, for " God's ways are not our ways." " The world by wisdom knew not God," could not anticipate his demands, but placed them in the lowest ranges of the creature's own being, and amidst the vulgarest and basest instincts of his own unchecked depravity. It ,was so eminently human, that in no way or sense could it be divine. No reasoning can be so il logical and inconsequent as that which certain theologic neophytes import from the chairs of professors, which claims the divinity of the "sat isfaction" theory, because humanity invented it, or something akin to it, as demanded by their 156 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT sense of what God ought to do and demand, in order that he might uphold his throne, and keep in his hands the safeguards and assurances that hold in stability the concerns of his august em pire ! 2. Still the question recurs, Is the doctrine clearly found in the divine records? for, if so, we must accept it, however it may stagger reason, or strain to the utmost the strength of our faith. And, before proceeding to this examination, let me say, that no system of dogmatic theology can be constructed out of types and symbols, especially where those dogmas respect vast governmental relations. They are too shadowy and unsubstan tial. They touch and illustrate a subject, or a character, often at a single point only, without application or significance further, beyond that single point. They often mean more or less than the subject calls for ; for instance, Christ is called " our passover." But the point aimed at was to secure his acceptance by the Jew ; it being im mediately added, "who was sacrificed for us." There is no parallel to be run between every cir cumstance of selecting, keeping, slaying, roast ing, and eating the paschal lamb by the outgoing Israelites, and the sacrifice of Christ upon Cal- OLDER THAN THE CREEDS- 15 7 vary ; and, should this be done, there is no single element in it which gives countenance to an ex piatory and satisfaction system. So neither can a ceremonial observance originate or uphold alone a system of moral principles. These principles being first disclosed and applied authoritatively, are then and thereafter capable of renewal and enforcement by an outward symbol or ceremony, which gives them a perpetual freshness and power. Like baptism or the Lord's supper, cut these off from the ideas they were intended to symbolize, and the wit of man would never again get the lost clew or reunite them. The same remark ap plies to most of those prophetical announcements which are now generally admitted to be Messianic ; which had little or no significance to the Hebrew of a contemporary age, which meant little but enigma and mystery even to the prophet who wrote them, but now shine so clearly in the light of actual fulfilment, that we wonder how they could be so blinded and mistaken ; forgetting all the while that prophecy before the fact is a riddle, to be unfolded and read only by the light of its after accomplishment. How many theories of the end of the world, the time and manner of Christ's second coming, and a thousand other 158 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT speculations about the beast, the dragon, the white horse of the Apocalypse, and the seven heads and ten horns and the little horn of Daniel, are now extant, by the various dreamers and interpreters of prophecy yet unfulfilled ! How many set times have there been for the sounding of the final trump ! Now it must not be forgotten, that the like mist and dimness veiled the clearest of an cient prophetical disclosures, and put the mind as, much at fault over what now seems clearly ac complished, as what yet remains for fulfilment. But, whether fulfilled or unfulfilled, what solid ground is there in these fragmentary, figurative, and poetic allusions — flashes and glimpses into the hidden mysteries of God — on which to erect a framework of moral government, and lay the sure foundations of a dogmatic creed, to be forced upon the Church of God in spite of the most un answerable arguments against it? 3. Another preliminary remark of vast conse quence. If Chrisf came to die that he might satisfy justice, and show by penal endurances God's abhorrence of sin, no word that he uttered during his life, or after his resurrection, indicates that he was himself aware of the fact. Have we ever duly considered the weight of this significant OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 159 truth? Not an assertion or allusion which, by the keenest torture of criticism, can be made to bear the stress of any such interpretation. No : whatever evidences the dogma may have, it gets none from the principal agent in the great trans action, — the one who knew best, could have dis closed most infallibly this secret of the divine counsels, — nay, upon whose shoulders rested the pillars of this very government, to be sustained only by the shedding of his heart's blood ! Strange indeed, when it is deemed so vital to the sound ness of Christian faith to-day, that Christ himself should have sealed his lips, and given no clew to find our way into the high governmental signifi- cancies of such an amazing transaction ! Respect ing the fact of his death, the cruelty of it, the wickedness of it, the consequences of it to him self and his people, including his resurrection and ascension and the shedding forth of the Holy Ghost, he was not reticent; nay, he mournfully provided for its remembrance to the end of time : but what it accomplished Godward, what were to be its governmental bearings upon law and justice and penalty, and the high concernments of Jeho vah's empire, he did not disclose even by a pass ing allusion, but treated the whole melancholy 160 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT tragedy before him as if such an aspect of it had no existence. Respecting his giving his life " a ransom " for many, I shall speak directly. I know it has been urged, that there is progress in doc trine in the New Testament ; that Christ furnished the material in his life and teachings, but did not construct a theology, which was left for his apos tles, who through the Spirit constructed dogmas which bind the Church as really as if uttered by our Lord. But it remains here to find the mate rials of any such theory. We have the Old Testament, and the life of Christ possessed by the apostles : it is not there, and we deny their right to interpolate it. "If I, or an angel, from heaven, preach any other doctrine, let him be accursed," says the apostle, in the vivid literalism with which he adhered to the teachings of Christ. 4. Once more, and as preliminary to our search, let it be remembered, that we admit to the full, nay, insist as the basis of our faith, upon the true scope and significance of all that class of Scrip ture quotations which set forth the fact that God in Christ was in vicarious sacrifice for man, "gave his life for us," "died that we might not die," "bore our griefs and carried our sorrows," came into the condition of our lapsed humanity, and was OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. l6l thus made subject to our temptations, sorrows, and distresses : for he could bear our griefs only by sharing them, in the close intimacy of a heav enly sympathy ; he could carry our sorrows only by letting the crushing burden of our woe be taken off, and held by a loving heart, that knows by experience the sting of every grief, and can open the springs of alleviation and comfort. So grand and glorious does this doctrine stand forth in the redemptive economy, that it dwarfs all others. Coming up to the full measure of human need and divine mercy, it leaves no room for placations and satisfactions and expiations. It bears on its front the marks of so royal a largess, such free grace and goodness, that all ideas of bargain or contract pale into insignificance. Without Christ's whole work, from its conception in the divine councils to its close, — if it shall ever close, — salvation would have been impos sible ; not that the divine clemency to man would have been less, but that the appropriate spiritual condition in man could never have been produced by any other or different agency, which would have made the communication of that clemency, in the shape of forgiveness, safe or effective. In other words, its power and fitness is in recon- 162 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT ciling man to God, and not God to man ; and so the Scriptures abundantly affirm. God was in Christ, not to placate himself, or make himself willing to have mercy ; not to adjust, and set in harmony any of the wheels of governmental on going which were grinding in disastrous collision. No ! Man's sin was not unanticipated, had no such disarranging force in the principles of the divine administration. Man before knew good : he now knew both good and evil by the sharp bite of experience. And these divine forces of redemption, operating to disclose God's love, as yet unaltered and unwearied, were the very forces needful for our return and recovery ; for crime, instantly it exists, hides itself from God among the trees of the garden : its normal consciousness is that of fugacious fear. It trembles at its own upbraidings ; and if thereafter it becomes hardened and defiant, it is the hardy reaction of terror, hunted to its last hiding-places by the wolfish cry of its harrowing remorses. God is only a consuming fire and terror to the sinner, because conscience holds over him the scorpion lash of its retributions ; and, independently of Christ as a redemptive spiritual force, he has no knowledge that there is for him any remedy or OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 63 any hope. And here let me affirm, once for all, that it is this simple view of Christ as a forgiving God, who gives, through the ideas and emotions we entertain concerning him, repentance and re missions of sins ; in whom as the God of all grace we believe, rejoicing in hope of his glory, — it is this, and this alone, on which the faith and piety of the Church has been fed so long and so lovingly, out of which all her endurances, heroisms, and martyrdoms have grown ; and not the dry dogmas of governmental satisfactions, which figure chiefly in our creeds, catechisms, and colleges, where they are drilled into the memory as a branch of orthodoxy, but never be come rooted in human affection, or control in any degree the conduct or the life. Thank God for that at least ! I cite a class of proof-texts, referred to by an eminent author, as proving this theory of expia tion. They are specimens, but so in point, that, if the doctrine exists at all, it must be in them, or some of them. " Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world ; " John i. 29. This might be of some significance, if it were first made to appear that " expiation " was the only mode of removing sin. But it never removes or 164 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT takes away the sin, however it may punish it. The sin remains even after the penalty of it has been satisfied. Now the beauty and glory of the gospel is, that it does not strike at all at the penal ty, but at the sin, which sets the penalty in play. If this is removed, there is nothing for penalty to feed on; and so his name was "Jesus," because " he shall save his people from their sins." And here the allusion was to a lamb, or the scape goat, which was turned into the wilderness after the sins of the people had been confessed upon his head. The Jews would understand by this, that Christ was so to provide for the carrying away or deportation of their sins, that by faith in him they should be wholly forgotten, lost in the wilderness, buried in the depth of the sea. No germ of an expiation theory here ! " Hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God;'' Ephesians v. 2. I remark, first, upon this passage, that it is one which de rives its significance from its reference to the sacrificial offerings of the Hebrew economy. The high priest took the offering of the devotee, slew it, burned or ate it ; and this ceremonially atoned, or brought God and man together, — man offering his sacrifice in token of loyalty, and OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 65 God accepting it, and pronouncing his forgive ness ; and so the rebel was ceremonially clean. What proofs does the satisfaction theory derive from this? Was the offering of the Jew "to ex piate his sin and satisfy justice"? Never! or, if so offered, was obnoxious to the divine majesty. Now Christ offered himself, his whole life and work, in sacrifice for us to God. "This is my beloved son, in whom I am well pleased," was the approval of his Father, whose heart was in it, equally with the heart of the Son. It was "to God," because he sent his Son to do it, and every step of it was taken beneath the beaming eye of his love ! His council planned it, his wisdom provided it, and it was executed as to him and for him ! There is surely no proof in this for expiation ; and if the death of Christ was expia tory, why not that of James and John? Did not Christ say to them, "Ye shall indeed drink of the cup that I drink of, and be baptized with my baptism," referring directly to his sufferings and death? " He is the propitiation for our sins : and not for ours only, but for the whole world;" 1 John ii. 2. "He loved us, and sent his Son, the propitiation for our sins ; " 1 John iv. 10. The dogma which 1 66 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT propitiation is supposed to imply and prove is, that human sin wrought wrath in the bosom of God, which was about to be executed, when the Son, of gentler feeling and on mercy bent, inter posed, and covenanted in due time to propitiate, placate, or satisfy justice in respect to all those who should ultimately be saved ; that his dying agonies especially were so given, and God was thus propitiated toward the elect. So industriously has this view been circulated, that it has gone into the definitions of our lexicons, and forms the staple thought of half the hymns in our books of devo tion ; and yet it derives not one particle of proof from this matter of propitiation. The reference is evidently to the covering of the mercy-seat over the ark, between the hovering wings of the cheru bim, called the propitiatory, the place where God had chosen to manifest his mercy, and pro nounce the pardon of his people. It had no reference whatever to the means of securing this pardon. How beautiful, then, the thought that Christ is our propitiatory, through whom, and by whose agency in and upon us, our sins may be pardoned, covered, and blotted out of remem brance ; that Christ has become God's mercy- seat, through whose life and death, purer and OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 167 dearer than the gold of the ark, we are made acceptable to God, that we might live through him ! This exhausts the entire meaning of this reference, and yet it has been made to bear the main weight of this edifice of "satisfaction," with which the creeds of Christendom have been dis figured. So the fifty-third chapter of Isaiah is a maga zine from which the advocates of this theory draw their strongest weapons. This chapter is pro phetical and highly figurative. We do not look for literalism in such highly charged dramatic and tragic utterances. " He bore our griefs, and car ried our sorrows," not literally, for your griefs and mine had no existence then ; but griefs and sorrows akin to ours, coming out of the same fountain of evil from which all human sorrows flow, that, touched with a feeling of our infirmi ties, he might give to us all the sympathy and aid of a kindred nature, who had sounded to the bottom the deeps of mortal grief and woe. And so he was " wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities, and with his stripes we are healed." But for human iniquity, he would not have been wounded ; and the healing of our souls comes only through his redemptive l68 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT agency, — his sorrows, afflictions, stripes. For these must all be borne, that a leverage, baptized in tears and blood and death-sweat, in the gar den and on the cross, should be created, strong enough and tender enough to reach the chief of sinners, and break in pieces the flinty rock of sin. If the whole chapter has a look of substitution, it is fully explained by the idea, that Christ suf fered and died that we might not suffer and die ; for, without him, we must die eternally. But this is wide as the poles from the theory of transferred penalties and guilts and satisfactions, of which we are now speaking. " Being justified freely by his grace, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus : whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation, through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God, . . . that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus;" Rom. iii. 24, 25, 26. This is part of an argument to show that men are justi fied by faith, and not in consequence of works, or what they can do, to earn salvation. "Justify" is here used in a forensic sense, and means to treat as innocent, to acquit of wrong, and pro- OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 169 nounce acceptable. This can be done only, first, by strict obedience to God in thought, word, and deed, rendered only by the angels ; and, second, by the plan and in the mode prepared by Christ through the repentance and faith of the soul once involved in the death of sin. It is freely, — by his grace or favor, — not "bought." The "re demption" includes the effect of Christ's work upon the soul, — it is a redemption from sin, and so from punishment, — is internal, and not ex ternal to it. Christ is the medium, mediator, or propitiatory, through whom this clemency is ten dered. It is his mode of making a sinner right eous, introducing a principle of genuine and honest loyalty and love and true faith, in which are wrapt all the elements of righteousness, rudi- mental if not efflorescent ; and, in this way, God is a just God, while he is yet a merciful Saviour. Not that he treats all men upon the principles of rectilinear justice. No such thing ! No man has his just deserts : none could stand a moment if God was strict to mark iniquity. But God, in this mode of mercy, is unjust to no one. " Is thine eye evil because I am good?" says God's infinite love to the sticklers for justice. Mercy is exercised in a way to honor the law, because 170 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT God has already written his law upon the heart, and put it within the mind. It would be safe to forgive in all cases where sin was abhorred and faith reigned ; for there heavenly loyalty is again reinstated, and upon a firmer footing after the bitterness of sin is past. In all these texts, we find no proof to uphold this dogma of governmental exactions and expia tory sufferings. We find Christ's coming and work necessitated by the exigencies of human sin and misery, called for by it, so that, in a most dreadful sense, our sins crucified our Lord ; but nowhere that sinners were purchased, body and soul, from the devil, who held them captive (as the Church held for twelve hundred years) ; nor from the Father, by a transaction wholly external to the sinner, and with which he had no more to do than sheep sold in the shambles. When our Lord's sacrifices are spoken of as a "price," it is not in the vulgar sense of a bargain, but as a price of infinite condescension and love, given freely that we might live. But is not his work called an atonement, and were not atonements expiatory? What expiation was there in the prayer of Moses when, on the mountain, he prayed God to turn away his wrath from Israel ? OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 171 there was no smoke of incense, no altar-fire, no flow of blood; and yet Moses says, "I will make an atonement for you." An atoner is a mediator or a " middler," as Wycliffe has it (and see Trench on Words), a daysman who brings variant par ties together, irrespective of the means of such reconciliation. No one figure (and it is only a figure) has been used more unsparingly to build up this theory of satisfactions than that which represents our Lord as a "ransom," — "He gave his life a ransom for many." Used as a similitude, it has been literalized into a fact ; and in all the earlier systems, even down to the times of Anselm, this ransom was deemed to have been paid to the devil, to whom we belonged as slaves by reason of Adam's apostasy ; and as it was wrong to use power simply against the Evil One, a considera tion by way of ransom was given to him for all the elect. This is largely insisted on by Irenseus, although Origen appends to this the conceit, that in the bargain the tempter was overreached by infinite wisdom, and made the unwitting agent of befooling himself and defeating his own aims : - lie supposing that if those whom Christ came to save could be induced to reject and destroy him, he would secure the whole race to himself for 172 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT ever ; whereas it turned out that this very rejec tion and crucifixion were essential parts of God's plan in the redemption of man ! After Athanasius and Anselm, this doctrine of satisfactions began to be spoken of as a satisfaction, not to the devil, nor yet to God, but to "justice," as though an im personal attribute or quality of God had assumed a potential personality, and had claims which must be satisfied before forgiveness could be ex tended to the guilty ! There is often great misti ness in these statements in regard to the supposed claims of "Justice ; " and high dogmatisms as to what God could do, or could not do, in re spect to sinful man, without the permission of this theological autocrat "Justice," were pro nounced and indulged. God was no longer the sovereign, having mercy upon whom he would have mercy, but the executor and dispenser of pardons according to certain metaphysical and scientific necessities, founded on philosophical principles, determined by the methods of Aristotle, and the demonstrations of logic ! And the stick lers for this waning heresy even now bewail the fact, that, in all the post-apostolic and early patristic literature, there is no enunciation of the " metaphysical ground" of this vital pillar of OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 73 modern orthodoxy. No ! it remained for Athan asius and Anselm and their fellows down to the Reformation, and, after that, for Luther and Cal vin, to indulge in the comforting and delectable blasphemy following : " Had Christ been mur dered by robbers, his death would have been no kind of satisfaction ; but when he was cited as a criminal, accused and crushed by witnesses, and condemned by a judge, we understand by these tokens that he sustained the character of a wicked criminal." In whose eyes, do you suppose he means? for it was not true even in the eyes of Pilate, — no, but in the eyes of God's justice, who knew all the while what a stupendous and lying tragedy it was, how falsely he was accused, and how villanously murdered ! And again he says, — "Nothing had been ef fected if Christ had only died a corporeal death ; but it was incumbent on him also to feel the se verity of divine revenge, in order that he might both ward off wrath and satisfy a righteous sen tence. Wherefore we wonder not if it be said he descended into hell, since he endured that death which is inflicted by an angry God on the wicked." And Luther's language is even fouler than this. Why was it that the clear heads and fervent piety 174 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT of these champions of the Reformation did not revolt with horror from such a compound of lying and blasphemy? Because Calvin undertook the production of a comprehensive and logically con structed system of theology, that should embrace the whole universe of moral being and agencies, and be a law and a philosophy both to God and man. Nothing so vast had ever been attempted. He was only twenty-seven years of age, a convert from Romanism of only four years' standing. Educated in all the follies and doctrines of the Papacy, he took the materials offered, principally as he found them, except in reference to the errors against which Protestantism was a specific protest. But this doctrine — by this time linked with the notion of Christ's passive sufferings to satisfy justice, and active sufferings to lay up a stock of supererogatory righteousness — fitted in so well with the cognate follies of imputations against the fact, and the validity of decrees and elections, that he incorporated it as necessary to the build ing he was so laboriously constructing. Luther was an iconoclast, but yet there were many idols he failed to break : he bowed in the house of many a Rimmon to the day of his death. And so our later symbols, by Westminster Assemblies OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 175 and Synods of Dort and more modern councils, have adopted all these figments of a finical age, and all these inventions of theological-system builders, who are in sad lament that they find such imperfect warrant in the New Testament for this stupendous machinery which their creeds are now made to carry. The covenant of works with Adam ! pure fiction ! where is it? who ever saw it? On trial for all his posterity ! where is it nominated in the bond? Who told Adam this? Covenant of grace ! councils of eternity ! where is the evidence? Well has an author asked, "What herald convened it? who composed it? or what meaning can we affix to it that is not inex pressibly degrading? Oh, unhallowed, impious, miserable invention of the human brain, which yet has been accepted as inspiration ! Men in perplexity summon councils to debate and discuss for the removal of difficulties. But is this the Great God ? " In council with whom ? with him self? What an abuse of language ! and a world to be saved or lost, through a bargain which he drove with himself, for God is one ; and men bap tize this compound of folly and inanity with the name of 'theology ' ! Can we wonder that thought ful men repudiate these dogmas as fast and as far 176 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT as they understand them ? for it may be affirmed without the fear of contradiction that seventy out of every one hundred genuine Christians will deny at once that any such doctrine is contained in our standards. They do not so understand it ; and when it stands up stripped of its subterfuges, in its true pagan dress, they utterly disclaim any belief in it. They must avouch the standards in joining the Church ; but a mind just emerging from its death-struggle with sin, and burning with love from the consciousness of the fact that Christ lived and died to save it, is not greatly concerned with the philosophy of this fact and its govern mental relations God-ward, so long as its aspects man-ward are of such touching and tender signifi cance. And this is just the reason why the dogma has not long ago been routed from the symbols of the Church. It has kept its place by skulking. Embedded in our creeds, it has held in its arms, and hidden its own deformities behind the central sun of Christianity ; the doctrine of Christ's vicari ous sacrifice for us. To the common apprehen sion this fact is exhaustive of the whole redemptive scheme. God is not discerned as the offended party, burning with revenges, and securing, through bargains and contracts and satisfactions, OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 77 a series of high transactional appeasements, grow ing out of himself as incarnate, and offered to himself as unincarnate ! No such drivelling inanities are thought of; but the grateful soul believes, that "God so loved the world that he sent his Son," at infinite cost to his own heart, and at a sacrifice the mind of Gabriel through eternity can never fathom; that the blessed Son, always beloved of the Father, not more when he said, "Lo! I come to do thy will, O God," and "thy law is within my heart," than when, in his agony of temptation in the garden, the blood- drops from his forehead ensanguined the grass where he knelt, while an angel strengthened him, or when given over to the murderous wrath of man, who was killing the body by torture, he exclaimed, " My God ! my God ! why hast thou forsaken me?" And so all the heart of the triune God was in the winepress of that shocking tragedy, and went out in pulsations of ineffable love over the very blinded wretches who enacted it, and whose life eternal hung upon its awful issues. And here, in the cross, we strike the key-note of God's council and plan for the extirpation of sin and the recovery of man to himself, — not by stern precepts or penal thunders, not by an array 178 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT of sovereign forces by which he holds the world in the hollow of his hand, but in the more ade quate showing forth of himself. Always long- suffering, always in patience, always in sacrifice, always in the burden of a yearning love, and the outgoing of an exhaustless compassion ; but now, the Good Shepherd takes up his crook, and starts into the mountains after the wanderer ; now the for giving Father sends his obedient Son to win back the disobedient prodigal. The epochs of earlier demonstrations were complete, the waxing and waning ages had rolled on, and now the Redemp tive Star arose over Bethlehem's manger, — bright er, clearer, nearer, more potential in the beauty of its lustre, until angels and men saw God in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself. And this same law of sacrifice in which God moves and acts, is the same law by which fallen human nature is made over in the image of Him that created it, — first, as a force operating through the understanding and upon it, and then as a force operating upon the heart and in it : " Christ in you ; " "I in them, and thou in me ; " Christ in humanity, in the sympathy of burdened affections, tender solicitudes, and helpful ministrations. It is not in our philosophies to soften the rough OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 79 places of existence ; it is not in our sciences to fathom the councils or explain the ways of the infinite ; it is not in our metaphysics to harmonize and make peace in the disordered and discordant realms where sin has effected its moral unhinge ments. Ah no ! We are drawn upward by the cords of love, by the showing of sorrows and afflictions and sacrifices and burdens which nothing but the heart of love could bear. The wildest sorrow that ever drove its shaft into the bosom of humanity, Christ has known it before us. In all our afflictions he was afflicted. In all our soul agonies, except our shame and remorses for sin, which a holy being could not feel for himself, he yet felt for us, in the intimacy of a sympathy that knew all our temptations and strug gles, and came near us to relieve and to save. This is the electric fire which has flashed from heart to heart, the world over and the ages through, since it quivered in tongues of flame on Pentecostal brows. This has drenched the soul of Penitence with sorrow ; lighted the eye of Faith with a brilliance reflected from the open doors of heaven ; hallowed the dungeon's gloom with glory ; quenched the violence of martyr fires ; and shot a light of unearthly gladness in the van l8o THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT of all the civilizations that have followed its her alding, and scattered blossoms in the way of feet that are weary, and hearts that, unsatisfied, are pining for rest. This, too, is the living vinculum which binds the heart closest to the heart of Christ ; for we become one with him, not more by that interpenetrative spirit of comfort and communion received directly from his indwelling, than by fol lowing close upon his example as a Saviour and sacrifice, so becoming, in our turns, priests, medi ators, workers of redemption after his holy pat tern ; in all the dark ways of sin and sorrow travelled by our fellow-pilgrims, filling up in our unwearied endeavors for the light and life of men, in our prayers and example and working, "the sufferings of Christ that remain," — remain for his people to continue what he began ; to fill up the plan, round out the perfect ideal ; to carry up the superstructure of which he laid the foundation and provided the materials, "until its top-stone shall be laid with shoutings of grace, grace unto it." Ah, the dignity of this co-working with Christ, not in the field of a vapid sentimentality, but on the theatre of manly working and doing and suffering in a cause of which sorrow and sacrifice are the alpha and the omega ; until re- OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. l8l demption shall have completed the beneficent designs of God to our race, and renovated man rejoice in the recovery of all that was lost in Eden, fortified, and made for ever steadfast and sure, by the royal authority of Him who shall reign King of Saints for ever, and for ever! 182 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT PART IV. Psalm lxxxix. 14: "Justice and judgment are the habitation of thy throne : mercy and truth shall go before thy face." TT seemed an insoluble problem to the Re- A formers of the sixteenth century, how God could exercise justice and mercy, at the same time, toward the same being. They found the divine records ablaze, all over, with praise to Jehovah as a merciful Father ; his love, kindness, forbearance, gentleness, forgiveness, shone forth in all historic facts, like stars in the night of man's extremity ; and yet, following it all, was the voice of his justice, which they believed must be satisfied, and could suffer no violation without utter ruin to all governmental arrangements. Beside, what would become of law without its penalty, never to be remitted? what of truth, if the threat proved abortive? How could judg ment have sway, and what restraint upon high treason to heaven, if the traitor escaped punish ment? True, the sweep of these objections and difficulties expunged mercy entirety from the attributes of God. "Justice" and "judgment" OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 83 and "truth" could not be the "habitation of his throne," and yet "mercy go before his face." It went beyond their conceptions, how God could be a just God and yet a Saviour of a race once stained with sin. They insisted that one class of attributes were exclusive, and utterly destructive of the other ; and the great achievement of dog matic theology has been the invention of a modus by which this difficulty was supposed to be solved, and a logical reconciliation effected of these con flicting ideas ; and high hosannahs have been sung and sounded through all Christendom over what is now lauded as the chief corner-stone of all sound orthodoxy on this vital point of Chris tian faith. The Psalmist did not perceive the difficulty which so staggered modern theologians. None of God's ancient prophets, seers, and holy ones, were troubled with any such inconsistencies. They felt the hand of justice ; they withered be neath the lash of law : but, at the same time, they lauded the mercy that remitted the penalty, and praised Jehovah as the " Lord God merciful and gracious, slow to anger,, and abundant in good ness and truth, who pardoned their iniquities, and buried them in the depths of the sea." 184 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT I propose to show, — 1. That the difficulty which so perplexed the minds of our early theologians had no real ex istence, but was founded in false and insufficient views of moral government, of what justice and mercy, combined in the divine character, de manded ; that in truth there was no moral enigma to be solved, no contradiction to be reconciled, except in the misconceptions of their own minds in bringing down Jehovah to the petty dimensions of some earthly tyrant, and shaping his govern ment by the principles of human ethics and the logic of the schools ; and 2. That this lauded solution is worse, by far, than the difficulty it pretends to solve ; that it makes havoc with mercy, truth, justice, right eousness, and every attribute of Jehovah, and plunges the processes of the divine administration into the blackness of darkness for ever : the solu tion is more mysterious and inexplicable than the problem to be solved. 1. In God's moral government there is no an tagonism between justice and mercy, simply be cause that government is not only kingly and magisterial, but paternal and equitable ; for while, as a Lawgiver, he announces the precept to be OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 185 followed and the penalty of its violation, yet as a Father he proclaims the conditions which his infinite wisdom and love have annexed to this law. Side by side with the " fiery law" of Sinai — the ten precepts implied in the "thou shalt not," without a penalty in the law annexed to either — stand the conditions upon which rewards and punishments are meted out to the subject : " But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live: he shall not die;" Ezekiel xviii. 21. And so, again and again, are the conditions by which mercy "saves the repentant soul alive" announced by God's prophets and messengers, as if in anti- ' cipation of the absurd glosses and interpretations which might be put upon the announcement, "The soul that sinneth it shall die," — die, as is claimed, without remedy, mercy, or forgiveness. The paternal nature of God makes all his threatenings and promises conditional : they could not be other wise. In the family relation, it is not deemed incongruous that rewards and punishments should be so graduated by the conduct of the child. We deem it a hideous and revolting tyranny, if for one offence, or many offences, the feet of the boy 1 86 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT are driven from the door, and the home where his infancy was nurtured, and where he was rocked to rest above the beatings of a mother's heart. We call such parents monsters, and as such does Christ regard them, when he draws the touching picture of the prodigal's father hold ing his repentant child to his forgiving heart, and lavishing upon him the tokens of his irrepressible love, "forgiving him until seventy times seven." But in our rage for systematic divinity, we deny to God the liberty to exhibit in his great family these traits of mercy which so win our reverence and love when shown by a fellow-mortal ! Justice in the family may be conditioned by mercy, both in exercise toward the same offender, while the order of the household is yet maintained, and rebellion stayed ; but we cannot conceive how in the larger household of our infinite Father, he can be left free to act upon any such principles ! No : penalty must always have its gorge ; law, its satisfactions. Penal exactions can never be remitted, only transferred : there must be only satisfactions and appeasements ! No free pardon, no unbought forgiveness, no pouring the unstinted waves of God's yearning heart over his repentant and returning children, unless that heart is first OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 187 set in motion by equivalents, and drawn out by ransoms and a price ! That God's love originated the redemptive agencies that lead to man's recov ery, and sent the Logos, or human manifestation of himself, to turn the wanderer's feet back to his heavenly home, seems to be wholly ignored ; and "burning thrones" are set up, and fires lighted of such fury as to be soothed or extinguished only in blood. "If I be a Father," says God, "where is mine honor?" Shall he not be permitted to display, on the high theatre of his moral admin istration, those traits of considerate and beautiful affection which so halo the Head of our earthly households. Not only have all these views been strangely overlooked, but scholastic divinity has never seemed to have any true conception of God's justice in the scheme of his administration. In their rigid, narrow, materialistic, and unspiritual logic, the divine government is supposed to pro ceed on the theory of administering strict recti linear justice in all cases, from breach of precept to infliction of penalty, without hindrance or con dition (excepting always their strange device of inflicting the penalty upon one not deserving it), when it is clear as the sun at noonday that no l88 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT moral government of human beings is possible on any such hypothesis. Rectilinear justice ! would it not have slain Adam with his first sin, arrested Eve with the apple in her mouth, and stripped this fair world of God's crowning work, while Paradise was in its morning bloom, and put an arrest upon the "quiring of the young-eyed cherubim," as he chanted the glory of that dawn ing prime ? Surely, from the beginning no human being in time has been subjected to strict recti linear justice ! It would depopulate earth to-day of saint and sinner alike. How dare sin-stained men talk of strict justice, playing with its fiery bolts as unconcerned as children at the crater of a volcano, under the fancy that by some theologi cal juggling it would strike some one beside them selves ? No : justice and mercy are inseparably linked, go hand in hand. Each is tempered by the other, and there is no clash of claims in their mutual workings. Injustice there is none ; but strict justice without mercy will execute the mandates of spiritual laws only after a scheme of probation is exhausted. Justice deals with retributions, and measures its deserts to sin ; but always under the sway of wise counsels, and for purposes which OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 189 they alone demand, — always as a co-efficient of mercy in respect to divine law and human con duct. As an agency to waken a sense of re sponsibility in the conscience, and arm law with its sanctions, and press obligation upon the soul, it is indispensable ; but when this schoolmaster function has been performed, and the sensibilities of the soul awakened, it is Mercy that, with tear ful eye and softened and melting heart, lays her forgiving hand on the head of Penitence, as she kneels subdued by the conscious forces of love before the altar of God's reconciliations. The power of law and justice may possibly compel an outward and ritualistic obedience, — the forced submission of the slave earning salvation ; but the power of grace alone originates a spontaneous and loving loyalty, that springs in the depths of the soul, welling up into life everlasting. By what royal prerogative is it that justice is supposed to dominate mercy in the divine attri butes? Which lies back deepest in the eternities, — the love, goodness, nobleness, in which Jeho vah essentially dwells, and has ever dwelt ; or the justice which follows instituted government, and flames out retributively on the track of its infringe ment? Or, if these attributes can be conceived 190 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT of only as coeval and co-ordinate, who shall dare to say that God has no right or power to remit penalty on conditions always announced, and en tering as moral and spiritual forces into the frame work of his righteous administration? Part and parcel of the same economy, they are forces so to speak that attack fallen humanity on different planes of its nature, — the one arousing and convicting the conscience alive to the recti tude of law, and the sinfulness of its violation, and addressing the reason and understanding ; the other showing the pulsations of a Father's heart beating beneath the vestments of outraged sovereignty, ready to forgive, on condition of sorrow and amendment ; retribution threatened here, compassion shown there ; one administering desert, the other bestowing what infinitely tran scends desert. One originates correction, the other administers pardon to the penitent. Sal vation is the result of both, and would not or dinarily flow from the separate action of either. What God hath joined together, let not man put asunder. Is the Most High, then, to dispense with his justice, or is he to dispense with his mercy, — which? We reply, he is to dispense with neither. OLDER THAN THE CREEDS- 191 The one arms law with its sanctions ; the other bathes the repentant rebel with its tears. They act as co-ordinate and interpenetrative powers, — grandly just, yet tenderly forgiving ; insisting on obedience, and still providing that lapse shall not work such perpetual undoing as to make all re covery impossible. The one limits the audacity of presumption ; the other prevents the horror of despair. The one shows law to be the harmony of the universe ; the other sweetly wins the soul to comply with its blessed requisitions. Not only are these attributes interacting, but they mutually magnify and exalt each other. There is no heart in retribution : it is a result of violated law, in natural, physical, and spiritual life as immutable as the roll of the stars. Fire will burn, and water drown, and gases suffocate, and weights crush, and starvation kill, and fatigue weary, and dis sipation destroy, and sin rob and ruin the soul. These administrations of penalty by justice are ever sure, and nothing but miraculous agency can avert them. To be rid of their fearful exactions, the sin^of the body and of the soul must come out of them. Mercy never quarrels with the pen alty : she weeps over the sin. To get at this, " she puts on the soul itself her secret supernat- 192 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT ural touch, and the soft inward baptism of her feeling, — even that which she has unfolded so powerfully in the facts of the cross : all dewing it thus with her tender mitigations, keeps it in the possibility of good." The redemptive economy strikes at the sin ; and while justice seeks its punishment, or rather cannot prevent its punishment while the sin is there, grace seeks its extirpation by forgiving freely the past, and writing the new law of love in the heart, and putting it in the mind : so that the new life, so fed, supplants the law of sin and death, and "grace reigns through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ, our Lord." It should never be forgotten, that penalty clings to sin, and cannot be separated without an infringe ment of the order of the universe, and the inevi table results of spiritual laws. It is well said, "these threatenings only declared, in general, what the grand causalities of justice were bring ing to pass, acting by themselves ; and the specific variations to be issued by the interactions of mercy show no abandonment of justice, and support no charge of discrepancy, as long as the retributive causalities continue under their naturally immuta ble laws ; " for justice itself is only a name used OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. *93 for convenience to denote the consequence at tached to certain moral, legal, or spiritual viola tions. In a most terrible sense, spiritual laws execute and vindicate themselves, not less than natural laws. The only way of escaping their penalty is by ceasing their infraction. As long as the finger is in the flame, it will feel the pain of the burning : as long as sin is cherished by the soul, its sting and taint will corrupt the springs of moral life, and bring misery with it. Not even mercy can remove the penalty without also removing the sin ; and this done, the penalty goes with it. One is amazed and saddened at the libraries that have been written to prove this mortal an tagonism between justice and mercy in the divine administration, which a true definition of penalty or retribution, the arm of justice, might have ren dered unnecessary. A misconception of what penalty is, — an idea that it was an arbitrary misery, annexed by statutory enactment to sin, which could be remitted at pleasure, — was in stilled into the popular mind, which could not see that it was an inevitable necessity, existing in the nature of things, as irrepealable as the law of gravitation, and that the only mode of avoiding 13 194 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT the sword of justice was to avoid the sin. Justice is never cheated, never thwarted ; for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. While sin is sown, the harvest will be sin and misery : when righteousness is sown, the fruits of righteousness will appear ; and justice and mercy will walk lovingly on the heights of heaven, in sweet and everlasting accord. It is only by the boldest of figures that justice is exalted to the rank of a per sonal demigod, filled with avenging thoughts and feelings. It is a mode of divine procedure, — consequential retribution in action, the reaping of life's harvest field, which comes the same in kind and quality, but larger in bulk, than the seed which the soul all along has scattered. 2. Not only did the radical misconception of the nature and offices of justice in a moral sys tem, which we have above considered, prevail ; to wit, that justice and mercy were in collision on the same field : but the modus invented to recon cile them in that system was the strangest that ever entered into mortal conception. Standing in irreconcilable antagonism, yet both must have full sway, which could only be done, as was sup posed, by the theological juggle of permitting Justice to wreak its wrath upon one innocent of OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 195 sin, that a violated law might be satisfied by pun ishing one who had never broken it, that judicial satisfactions of penalty might be reaped on a field which sin had never sown or polluted, in order that through a path thus opened by the destruction of all justice, truth, righteousness, and holiness in God, the bleeding feet of Mercy might travel in her mission of love ; and justice, truth, right eousness, and holiness shine more conspicuously through the very machinery which effected their total annihilation ! Was there ever before such a moral chaos? and then followed the quibbling as to whether the God or the man had paid the pen alty, — or whether paid at all, or only an equiva lent; whether the dignity of the victim did not compensate and alleviate the keenness of the tor ture ; whether the price paid secured the salvation of many or few, how it operated as an appease ment and placation in the case of infants ; and a thousand other theological fictions, such as always swarm about an untruth, and press for solution when a radical point is a falsehood or mistake. Like the motion of the heavenly bodies on the Ptolemaic theory, all is confusion and complexity. Nothing harmonizes, nothing stands and acts in its appointed place and relation. Every motion 196 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT is a surprise and a revolution ; and we stand in fear that all may yet rush into undistinguishable ruin. But now Copernicus announces the true law ; and every planet and flashing orb at once wheels into the line of its appointed orbit, and sweeps sublimely along the path of its revolution. All is seen now in its true relation to the great central law which holds and guides the universe : there is no surprise, for there is no aberration. All is held in the grasp of an harmonious adjust ment, and apparent disorder is seen to be only the stately steppings of nature's most orderly on going. So a great moral and spiritual truth explains and corrects all mistakes and miscon ceptions in the spiritual realm. God's moral government is seen to need no human vindica tions, no props from a false logic and a fictitious theology. His justice and mercy, his righteous ness and truth, can never work inharmoniously : they are all centred and grounded in his Father hood. Mercy is as reluctant that law should be broken as Justice. Mercy does not abrogate the law, but transfers it, from tables of stone to fleshly tables of the heart ; writes it, not with pen and ink in statutes and penal sanctions, but puts it within the conscience, safe beneath the cherubic OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 197 wings of love. Mercy extracts the poison, and so Death has no agent to execute his behests ; freely forgiving the past, because it is seen to be exceeding sinful and is repented of, Mercy plants within the soul, not the law of a carnal command ment, but the power of an endless life. How dare men invent subterfuges and mock truths, to vindicate the supposed dilemmas in the government of the great God : doing theologically the rankest injustice, and calling that satisfying justice ; practising cruelty upon the innocent, and calling that an equivalent for the punishment of guilt ; putting a malefactor's crown on the head of God's own Son, and loading him down with imputed guilt, — following thus in the track of the lying, blaspheming Jew, and the cruel, treacherous Roman ; echoing the cry of High Priest and Pharisee that he was worthy of death ; and then, in face of all this cruel trifling, impu dently asserting that in this very falsehood and misconception lies the whole moral power of the gospel? Equivalents and substitutions and satis factions are the potent spells that work these won ders ; and men are saved, not because they quit sinning, which is only a consequence, but because they are first made to see that the penalty of their 198 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT sins is shifted over upon another, and they go free ! ! In human society, what is thought of the man who is willing to shift the burden and penalty of his misdoing upon the head of an innocent com panion, and will let him bear the dishonor and punishment which the real culprit merits? We call him cruel, unjust, cowardly, mean-spirited, a hypocrite and knave. But all this is reversed in theology, and is actually made a ground of virtue and rejoicing. Christ became so great a power because, in revealing the heart of God to the heart of humanity, he touched the springs of reconciliation by suffering and sacrifice, which gain the heart's sympathy, and sweep the whole moral nature on its blessed tides. And when the windows of the soul are so opened, the golden sunlight of God's smile illumines all within, and a superhuman strength inflows, that lifts the be liever into his royal altitudes of faith and love and joy. It is not the substitutional idea, but the sacrificial, rolling up in such power and majesty, by the way in which that sacrifice was made, and the persistence and completeness of its accom plishment, through sorrows and a death all fore seen as unavoidable if he would get a hold on the OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 1 99 human soul, such as no craft of devil could ever destroy or annul. And so the historic Jesus is a power, no less than the ascended and living Jesus. From the manger to the cross, his doings and utterances are the germs and seed-plants of im mortal life to all who catch their significance, and become impregnated with their divine character. How truthful and appropriate the language of Dr. Young ! — " The instinct of justice in human nature is un questionable, but the instinct of mercy is deeper, and is never wanting in noble human souls. It is God-like to forgive, to forgive freely. Man never rises so nearly to the divine, as when out of a a pure, free, self-forgetting, irrepressible love, he forgives causeless wrong done to him. No pre cept of Christ has more indubitably the stamp of heaven upon it, than that gem of all gems which enriches the New Testament, and which can be found nowhere else, 'Love your enemies.' Never did the Saviour of men breathe out upon the world more of the deepest spirit of God, than when on the cross he prayed, 'Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.' It is divine, it is the divinest of all divine things, to forgive. We feel it; we are sure of it; there is 200 THOUGHTS ON THE ATONEMENT no arguing against it. It is an indestructible in tuition of reason and conscience. God would not be God to his human creatures ; the object of deepest veneration, admiration, and love, — if he could not and did not forgive, forgive freely and for ever ! "But eternal justice abides nevertheless, and, wherever sin is, justice brings down its inevitable doom in terms of the universal law, ssin is death.' This brief dark sentence might have summed up the entire history of man and of earth : on the ground of mere justice alone, nothing else could have transpired. But there is such an attribute as divine mercy, — pure, free, unprompted mercy. From the beginning, and through many agencies and influences, Mercy has wondrousty interposed not to defraud Justice, but to destroy sin, — to destroy sin which is death, and to create holiness which is life. At last by one amazing interven tion God's uttermost was put forth to secure the double effect. By love, whose breadth and length and depth and height no mind can compass, sin in the soul is slain, and the indestructible life- germ of holiness is implanted ; Justice receives all its own, for with the death of sin its claim is OLDER THAN THE CREEDS. 201 at an end, while pure Mercy takes forth the ran somed to beautify and bless them for ever, in the world of light and life and love."* * Life and Light of Men, p. 119. Cambridge : Stereotyped and Printed by John Wilson and Son. . . ¦ . ¦ ¦ . ¦ ¦¦ . . ¦ ' ' ' ¦ ; .