w { r ; i CUD «& — CHRISTIAN WORSHIP. A DISCOURSE DELIVERED AT THE XtbiuitM o! fyt Unitarian Cjmrrjj, IN WHEELING, VA. ON THE EVENING OF THE 15 MAY, 1852, BY REV. GEORGE W. BURNAP, D. D. Pastor of the First Independent Church x>f Baltimore! ¦Ji'v Baltimore: PRINTED BY JOHN D. TOY. 1852. +m^ .^^hg£^_ CHRISTIAN WORSHIP. A DISCOURSE DELIVERED AT THE JeMtafirm uf fyi Unitarian Cfmrrfr, IN WHEELING, VA. ON THE EVENING OF THE 15 MAY, 1852, REV. GEORGE W. BURNAP, p. D. Pastor of the First Independent Church of Baltimore. BALTIMORE: PRINTED BY, JOHN D. TOY. 1852. CHRISTIAN WORSHIP. John xvi. 23, 24. — And in that day ye shall ask me nothing. Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in my name, he will give it you. We are assembled to dedicate this house to the purposes of Christian Worship. To those by whose zeal, enterprise and self-sacrifice it has been erected, I offer my heartfelt congratulations. I can appreciate the deep emotion with which you unite in the ser vices of this evening. It celebrates the consummation of a long cherished hope. It reduces to sober cer tainty the satisfaction of one of the deepest wants of the human soul, to have a house of prayer, a place where we may worship God according to the dictates of our own consciences, with none to molest or make us afraid. Worship is a universal necessity. The Pagan feels it, when he goes into the temple of his idols and bows down before a stock or a stone. The Savage feels it, when he glides along the dark waters under some lofty precipice, and feels his heart bowed by the mysterious presence of the unknown God. The Christian feels it, when he advances beyond the farthest wave of population and begins a settlement in the wilderness, and almost before he has hewn out a habitation for himself, he begins to build a house for God. David felt it, when God had given him rest on every side and crowned his reign with large pros perity; and he reflected that while he was surrounded with splendor and luxury, the sacred ark and God's holy altar, rested beneath the frail covering of a tent. In the plenitude of his zeal, "he sware unto the Lord, and vowed unto the mighty God of Jacob. Surely I will not come unto the tabernacle of my house, nor go up into my bed, I will not give sleep to my eyes, nor slumber to my eyelids, until I find out a place for the Lord, a habitation for the mighty God of Jacob." We all need a place where we may come, and in silence and seclusion lift up our hearts to God. We feel that we are made for something better than mere worldliness and perpetual toil. We have an instinc tive conviction that there is a Father of our spirits, as well as a Former of our bodies. We would testify by some outward act, that we are not unawed by that Majesty which sits enthroned amid the splendors of the universe, that we are not unobservant of that Wisdom which guides the changes of this stupendous world aright, — that our hearts are not untouched by that Benignity, which malies all the riches of creation the heritage of man. We desire sometimes to with draw from the world, that by meditation and prayer we may add strength to our faith, that by the inward eye we may learn to see him who is invisible. There are times when we would seek sanctuary from the troubles of this life. They sometimes thicken over us till they form a cloud so dark, as to shut out the face of our heavenly Father. The afflictions of life become a mystery too deep for our solution, until like the Psalmist, we go to the sanctuary of God. There light breaks in upon our darkened minds; there peace comes over our troubled spirits, and we learn serenely to trust to the kindness of that Father, whose chas tisements we cannot comprehend. But our spiritual wants are not all satisfied when we have provided a house of prayer. We need, likewise, instruction in sacred things. The temple at Jerusalem, under the old dispensation, was a house of prayer. As mind became developed, a want was felt of religious instruction ; and synagogues were built in every village. In the synagogue Jesus began his mission as the "Light of the world," as the teacher of mankind. When the Christian church was organized, the two objects were combined in the temples of Christian worship. Devotion and instruc tion were united, and the successors of the Apostles are the organ of bearing to heaven the prayers of the saints and. dispensing the truths of the everlasting Gospel. Thus all the spiritual wants of the soul are satisfied, and all is done that can be to keep alive the fire of piety on the altar of the heart, and to guide the feet in the path of duty. Men do not judge amiss when they estimate above all price the privilege of Christian worship and instruction. They feel that it is worth almost any sacrifice, and without it, life wants one of its highest ornaments and richest consolations. Our care to have a place of worship ceases not with ourselves. It descends to those who are train ing up with us, and who are to come after us. The most powerful aid which the parent receives in edu cating his children to virtue, piety and usefulness, is in the weekly services of the sanctuary. Here the divine doctrine drops as the rain and distils as the dew, and here the Lord commands his blessing, even life forever more. It is here in the temples of Chris tian worship that the sure foundation is laid for pri vate virtue and public prosperity, for the welfare of families and the safety of nations. Here souls are born anew into the kingdom of heaven, begotten by that incorruptible seed, the word of God, which liveth and abideth forever. But there are probably some here present, who may be disposed to call in question the doings of this day, who may be disposed to ask us why we have built this house. Was there not room enough in the churches already built? Why not worship at the altars already established? I bespeak your candid attention, while I attempt in all plainness and sim plicity to answer these questions. We have built this church in order to establish in it what we deem to be Christian worship. It is, as we think, the worship of the one only living and true God, in the name of Jesus Christ whom he has sent. We have established this church because we believe that there is but one Object of worship, one individual Being in the universe, to whom it is lawful to pray. In any other church in this city, we are called upon to pray to more than one Object of worship. We sometimes go to such churches. We have a sincere respect for the piety and devotion we find there. When they pray, as they do for the most part, to the one Object of worship, the only living and true God, we join heartily in their devotions. But when they pray to the Virgin Mary, or to Christ, or to the Holy Ghost, we cannot join them, our devotional feelings are disturbed, our sensibilities are shocked, our edifi^ cation is obstructed. Our Catholic brethren consider themselves justified in praying to the Virgin Mary. Nay, they feel them selves bound to do it. We do not doubt either their sincerity or their conscientiousness. We do not doubt even the fervor of their prayers, which they daily pour out with full hearts to the mother of Christ, whom they likewise call Jjie mother of God. They plead for it the authority and the usage of the Catho lic church for more than a thousand years. Thou sands and millions of pious hearts had prayed to the Virgin. Indeed, the custom was universal before the Reformation. Not only are custom and authority pleaded for this practice, but reason and sentiment are appealed to in its defence. It is said, that God is too pure and exalted a being to be approached by such sinners as we. It is presumption in us, polluted as we are, to address ourselves immediately to a holy God. How can a Being of infinite perfection sympathize with us in our weakness, our ignorance, our temptations? But a mother's heart is all tenderness and compassion. We fly to it with the fullest and most unlimited con fidence. To all such reasoning we answer, that such wor ship is plainly forbidden by the sacred Scriptures, %hich are our supreme law of faith and practice. 8 The first and fundamental commandment of the Jewish decalogue was, "Thou shalt have no other gods before me. Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them nor serve them." Christ recognized and perpetuated the same fundamental principle in the new dispensation. "Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve." There is, and there can be, but one Object of wor ship in the universe. Worship is founded oh the nature of the Being or Person worshipped, and his relations to the being who pays the worship. We worship God because he is the Creator and Governor of the universe. There is but one Creator and Gov ernor of the universe. We worship God because he is the Former of our bodies and the Father of our spirits. We worship him because he is omniscient and omnipresent; because we depend on him every moment for life and breath and all things. He is able to do for us any thing that we ask. No other being possesses these attributes, or sustains these relations, and therefore, in our judgment, it is not only irreli gious, but absurd for us to pray to any other being. W^th these convictions, we are virtually shut ojut of the Catholic church by the very form of worship which prevails there. We cannot say in the words of Christ, "Our Father who art in heaven," and in the next breath, "Hail Mary, mother of God." Therefore we build a church in which we may wor ship the only -living and true God, without any admixture with the creatures which he has made. For nearly the same reason, we are excluded from the worship of the Episcopal church.* In their printed form, which is used every Sunday, and in which the whole congregation is supposed to join, we find such an expression as this: "O God, the Holy Ghost, proceeding from the Father and the Son, have mercy upon us miserable sinners." To our minds such'a form of worship is wholly unauthorized. There is no such God revealed to us in the Bible as God the Holy Ghost. There is no such phrase to be found in the whole compass of divine revelation. The very language is a human invention, which had no exist ence till ages after the Scriptures were completed. "God the Holy Ghost," must be either the same identical Being who is named in the same prayer as " God the Father," or he is a different Being. If he is the same, then it is the worship of the same God under another name, and of course is a needless repe tition. If it is another being, then we are expressly forbidden to worship him by the prohibition, " Thou shalt not have any other gods before me." But the Holy Ghost, or the Holy Spirit, was known to the writers both of the Old Testament and the New ; yet there is no intimation, either in the Old Testament or the New, that the Holy Ghost or the Holy Spirit is an Object of prayer. There is no recorded instance in the Bible, of any person, Jew or Christian, worshipping the Holy Ghost. We have many prayers of the saints of the Mosaic dispensation recorded in the Bible, but never one instance of prayer to the Holy Ghost. Christ often prayed, but never to the Holy Ghost. He gave his disciples a form of prayer, yet no mention was made in it of the Holy Ghost. We have no record of any such form 2 10 of devotion until ages after the time of Christ and his Apostles. Not only so, we have abundant evidence that the Holy Ghost is not only not an object of worship, but not even a person. The Holy Ghost is synonymous with the Spirit of God, and the Spirit of God is expressly said to bear the same relation to God, which the spirit of man does to man. Says the Apostle Paul, " What man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him, even so the things of God knoweth no man but the Spirit of God." Such being the case, we hold it to be presumptuous for any man, or body of men, to draw up or adopt a form of worship for which no scriptural example or authority can be alleged. We say with the deepest sincerity and the profoundest conviction, that it is in violation of the letter and the spirit of the New Testa ment, and has the effect to drive away from God's altars those who wish to adhere to his holy word. In the same form of prayer, which is intended to be repeated by the whole congregation, we have the following petition: "O holy, blessed and glorious Trinity, three persons, and one God, have mercy on us miserable sinners." How is it possible for any human mind to join intelligently in such a petition as this? To worship a being, he must form some idea of that being. God has been pleased to reveal him self to us under human analogies, as a person, in the same sense that man is a person, as one intelligence, one consciousness, one will. We know what unity and personality are, from our own consciousness. 11 Each one of us conscious to himself of being one person, one mind, 'one intelligence, one will. We conceive of any other human being as having the same individuality. We address ourselves to every human being as possessing this individuality. All language is constructed with reference to this unity and individuality. We say, I, thou, he. There could not be conceived a greater absurdity than to say of any human being that he is three persons and one man. God having represented himself as subsisting in one person, and always speaking of himself as a per son, all prayer was directed to him, under the light of revelation as a person, and as one person. The Psalms contain the devotions of the people of God for many centuries. They are all addressed to God as a person, and as one person. We have the form of dedication, which was used by Solomon in the consecration of the first temple built on earth for the worship of the true God. And it commences, "O Lord God of Israel, there is no God like unto thee, in heaven above nor on earth beneath." By the use of the pronoun thee, it is evident that Solomon con ceived of God as subsisting in one person. So in the New Testament. In that form of prayer which Christ has given us, we are taught to say, "Our Father which art in heaven, hallowed be thy name, thy kingdom come, thy will be done." Over and over again in this short formula are we taught to pray to God, not only as one being, but as one person, and we are taught that God subsists in one person. 12 But in the form of worship to which I have alluded, we are required to say, "O holy, blessed and glorious Trinity, three persons and one God, have mercy upon us miserable sinners." Not only is this formula wholly unjustified by the Scriptures, but the object of worship which it presents, is wholly incon ceivable by the human mind. God in one person, we can conceive of with nearly the same clearness that we can conceive of man as one person. Indeed, we have no difficulty, on that score, for we are expressly told, that God has made man after his own image. But when we are called upon to worship a Trinity, three persons and one God, our thoughts are con founded, our minds are plunged in total darkness. The very idea is monstrous, and leads the thoughts into utter confusion. This Trinity itself must be a person, or we can hold no intercourse with it. There follows then, the contradiction of worshipping three persons in one person, or the impossibility of worshipping one God in three persons. There have been ages when the occurrence of such prayers as these in the devotions of the Christian church would cause no offence, for there were few who had learned to analyze their own thoughts. Now, however, the case is different. It is the privilege of this age to understand what it reads, and the only way in which any person, who has thought upon the subject, can join in the prayers of the Episcopal church, is to pass over in silence and mental reservation that portion of the devotions addressed to the Trinity, three persons and one God. 13 The projectors of this church felt themselves con strained to devote a portion of their substance to this enterprise, because there was no church in this city in which, if they joined in the services, they would not find themselves called upon to pray to Christ, or to worship him as God. This they felt themselves forbidden to do by the most emphatic prohibitions. In the first place, they are forbidden to pray to Christ by his oum express and explicit commandment. Not long before he left the world, as if anticipating the error into which his followers afterwards fell, he cau tioned them on this very point. Here, if we may credit all history, was the beginning of idolatry, the deification of departed men. Men had been deified and worshipped, although their bodies remained on earth and their sepulchres were still seen among men. Jesus was to come back from the tomb and ascend in a bodily shape in the sight of men to heaven. He was in some sense to be with his Apostles and his church forever. He was, in his own words, to ascend to his Father and their Father, to his God and their God. And in that high state of exaltation, were they not to be permitted to address themselves to him, to pray to him ? O no ! Not one word of prayer was to be breathed to him forever. " In that day ye shall ask me nothing. Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father, in my name, he will give it you." And no prayer has ever been addressed to Christ from that day to this, without a plain violation of this most explicit and peremptory commandment. Time would fail me to enumerate the various modes in which ingenious and learned men have 14 attempted to evade or explain away the force of this categorical prohibition. The most plausible has been to affirm that the word which is rendered ask, means to ask questions, to make enquiries. But that sub terfuge is refuted before the sentence is brought to a close. For the Saviour proceeds, " Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father, in my name, he will give it you." If it were asking questions of which the Saviour was speaking, then the promise would have been, Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father, in my name, he will tell you, or reveal to you. But it is, " he will give it you," showing that it is not informa tion, but benefits that they were to ask. That we are right in this interpretation, appears from what immediately follows. "At that day ye shall ask in my name, and I say not unto you, that I will pray the Father for you, for the Father himself loveth you." The position which Christ here repre sents himself to occupy, when he should be exalted to heaven, is not to be an object of prayer, but to be a suppliant himself, and to intercede, if it were neces sary, for his disciples, which he had left on earth. But he assured them, that such intercession would not be necessary, for God loved them without inter cession, and would therefore be ready to grant them their reasonable requests. Thus you perceive, that Christ first gives the emphatic prohibition, " Ye shall not pray to me when I am exalted to heaven," and then gives the reason for it. " I shall not occupy the position of your God, but of your intercessor with God. And such inter- 15 cession will not be necessary, for God himself loveth you." This discourse ends in a prayer, which accumulates reasons why we should not pray to Christ. In the first place Christ prays to the Father as the only true God, and speaks of himself wholly distinct from the only true God. " And this is life eternal, that they might know thee, the only true God and Jesus Christ, whom thou hast sent." Here he carefully distinguishes himself from the only true God, and he himself prays to that only true God. In the course of the same prayer, he denies to himself those attributes which alone could'constitute him a proper object of prayer. "And now / am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep through thine own name those whom thou hast given me." Is this the language of a being omnipresent and omnipotent, as that being must be, who is a proper object of prayer? Still stronger is another expression in the same prayer. "Father, I will that they also whom thou hast given me, be with me where I am." Does this confinement to a definite locality, and this request that his disciples may be with him, and all of course at the disposal of another, correspond with the attri butes of a being who is omnipresent, and is to be addressed in prayer by thousands and thousands at the same moment? But this, it may be said, Christ spoke in and of his human nature. It is confessed on all hands, that it would be idolatry to worship Christ's human nature. It is only his divine nature to which we praj. 16 But let us enter a Presbyterian church, and if we join in the service, what are we called upon to do ? We are called upon to pray to Christ as one of the persons of the Trinity. And of what is that person composed? We are told in the answer to the twenty-first question of the Shorter Catechism, which is the recognized standard of faith and worship in that church, " The only Redeemer of God's elect is the Lord Jesus Christ, who, being the eternal Son of God, became man, and so was and continueth to be God and man, in two distinct natures, and one person forever." Now how is it possible, if the human and divine natures are so intimately united and go to constitute the person of Christ, and that person is one of the persons of the Trinity, to pray to that person without praying to the human nature ? That the human nature is made an object of wor ship, we have abundance of evidence. In the hymns of Watts, which are extensively used in all the ortho dox churches, we have a representation of heaven, scenic it is true, and poetic in its character, but carry ing out the theological conceptions of the divines of W estminster. x " O for a sight, a pleasing sight, Of our Almighty Father's throne : There sits our Saviour crowned with light, Clothed with a body like our own. "Adoring saints around him stand, And thrones and powers before him fall ; The G-od shines gracious through the man, And sheds sweet glories on them all." 17 How is it possible for the human mind to separate the One from the other, even in thought, if the God shines through the man ? That the distinction is not made, that the man is not separated from the God, but on the contrary, that the mind fixes itself on the human relations, acts and attributes of this composite person,' we have the evi dence of the Episcopal liturgy. In that the wor shipper is made to say : " By the mystery of thy holy incarnation, — by thy holy nativity and circum cision, — by thy baptism, fasting and temptation, — by thine agony and bloody sweat, — by thy cross and pas sion, — by thy precious death and burial, — by thy glori ous resurrection and ascension, good Lord deliver us." The circumcision of God ! No sane man can con ceive such an idea. It must be the human nature which the worshipper has in his mind, when he utters such language as this. When I hear these appalling words in a church, or read them in a book in the middle of this nineteenth century, I am overwhelmed with astonishment and sadness. It sometimes seems to me, that the pagan perversions of Christianity, which it suffered in pass ing through the dark ages, had so transformed it, that it became a positive corruption of the pure and sub lime Monotheism of Moses and the prophets. What a falling off from the simple teaching of Jesus Christ ! " God is a spirit, and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth." What a declen sion from the apostolic doxologies! "Now unto the king eternal, immortal, invisible, the only wise God, be honor and glory forever and ever. Amen." " The 3 18 blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings and Lord of lords, who only hath immortality, dwelling in light to which no man can approach, whom no man hath seen or can see, to whom be honor and power everlasting. Amen." In the place of this unauthorized worship of Christ as God, we have raised up this church for the wor ship of God, in the name of Christ. By doing so we conceive that we conform most scrupulously to the requisitions of the New Testament and to the com mands of Christ himself. " In that day ye shall ask me nothing, but whatsoever ye shall ask the Father, in my name, he will give it you." By so doing we avoid the error and the sin of Polytheism, the offer ing up of petitions to more than one object of wor ship. We put the proper distinction between the only true God and Jesus Christ whom he has sent. We place Christ in the position which is claimed for him in the New Testament, not as God, but as the Mediator. "There is one God, and one Mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus." We acknowledge his mediation, the relation he is made to sustain to God on the one hand, and to man on the other. We acknowledge our faith in his mission- We acknowledge that through him, God has made himself known to us as we never could have known him in any other way. In his words and works we see the Father. He comes near to us, and through Christ, as it were, we hold communication with God. He is God's incarnate Word. The Father dwelt in him, as it were a tabernacle. He was one with the Father, by the unity of agency. He was the shep- 19 herd of God's sheep. None could pluck them out of his hands, because he acted for God. He was one with the Father, by the unity of affection and purpose, not of essence and consciousness, for he. prayed that his disciples might be one as he and the Father were. By him we are thus brought near to God. " He is the Way, the Truth and the Life. No man cometh unto the Father but by him." We acknow-. ledge him as the Ambassador of God's mercy. His Gospel is the New Covenant of forgiveness, which he sealed with his blood, in which God stipulates to par don the sins of the penitent believer. We acknowledge him as "the Resurrection and the Life," as the Pledge and Surety of immortality to man. He has made what was before a dim proba bility to become to us an assured reality. " He has abolished death and brought life and immortality to light through the Gospel," so that we sorrow no lon ger for the departed as those who mourn without hope. When we worship God in the name of Christ, we acknowledge his Lordship, that is his Divine author ity. " To us there is one God, the Father, and one Lord, Jesus Christ." He was exalted to that Lord ship first by Divine endowment. "He whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God, for God giveth not the spirit by measure unto him." In the second place, he is exalted to that Lordship, by the resurrec tion from the dead. "'God hath made this same Jesus, whom ye crucified, both Lord and Christ." By raising him from the dead, God gave his sanction 20 to all that he had taught in the name of God. This is what we understand by the Oriental figure of being raised by the resurrection to God's right hand. He was made the representative of his authority. He is made head over all things to the church. He is exalted " above principalities and powers, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but in that which is to come." This is the lordship "to which every knee shall bow, and which every tongue shall confess, to the glory of God the Father." When we thus honor Christ, we honor God who sent him, because God commands us to honor him as the representative of his authority. But were we to worship Christ as God, we should dishonor God who sent him, we should in fact dethrone God, treat him as if he were a nonentity, and substitute the Mediator in his place. By thus honoring Christ as the Mediator, and pray ing in his name, we are separated from the Deists on the one hand, and the Trinitarians on the other. We are separated from the Deists, with whom we are studiously confounded, for they recognize no Media tor, and believe in no revelation. We are separated from the Trinitarians, inasmuch as they worship Christ as God, while we do not. In thus establishing the worship of God in the name of Christ, we believe that we express the con victions of a large and growing portion of the Chris tian church, now connected with various denomina tions. The strict doctrine of the Trinity is fast becoming a dead letter. In this age, it is found, that it will bear neither exposition nor defence. It is safe 21 only so long as it is made a matter of tradition, and is handed down from generation to generation, unex amined, in catechisms, litanies and doxologies. Its most earnest opponents are often those who have converted themselves from belief in it by attempt ing its defence. There is a strong under-current of learning and culture, which is bearing the human mind away from this doctrine as a relic of other times. One hundred years ago, it was common for theologians to give long dialogues which took place between the persons of the Trinity before the creation of the world, and to state the terms of a cov enant entered into by them as contracting parties for the future redemption of the elect. Now the dogma, in the hands of its ablest defenders, has faded out into three distinctions in the divine nature. We believe that the time has now come to discard it altogether from Christian theology, or at least to build churches in which it shall be omitted from prayer and hymn, sermon and catechism. The cause of faith demands it. The time has been when it was comparatively harmless. It was passed over as a mystery, to be believed without being understood. The popular traditionary belief in Christianity was so strong, that its details were not examined, and faith was not staggered by mathematical contradictions, logical inconsistencies, and metaphysical impossibili ties. Or, if there was here and there an enquirer who presumed to detect and expose them, there was sufficient church authority to stigmatize the enquirer as impious and suppress investigation as profane. 22 But times are now changed. The human mind has become active. Enquirers have multiplied. Doubt is now open. Unbelievers have increased till their name is now legion. They are armed with vast learning and mental acuteness. The advocates of Christianity can be successful only by defending what is defensible, and abandoning every thing that is unsound. Nothing could benefit the cause of infidelity more than to fasten upon the Bible the doctrine of a tri- personal God, one person of which is Son to the other, and yet as ancient as his Father, the three persons of which each comprehend the whole of Deity, no more and no less, and yet are diverse, the one from the other. One of these persons is a com pound being himself, being made up of a human soul, which began to exist about eighteen hundred years ago, and the Divine essence, which has existed from all eternity. The cause of piety demands that the worship of three persons should be banished from the Christian church. There can be but one person who sustains to us the relation of God. Only one person can sus tain to us the relation of Creator. That person is denominated in the Scriptures of the Old Testament Jehovah. The same person is our Preserver and Benefactor, is every thing to us that God can be. To him alone are due those sentiments in our hearts^ which are denominated piety. We cannot exercise any sentiment of piety to Jesus Christ or the Holy Ghost. The word piety does not apply to our rela- 23 tions to them. We are not commanded in the Scrip tures to exercise piety towards them. The word piety does not apply to our relation to Christ, for the simple reason that he does not sustain to us the relation of God. We cannot exercise repentance towards Christ. We are not commanded to do so. We are to exercise "repentance towards God, and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ." God is our lawgiver, and he alone can forgive us. The faith that we are to cherish towards Christ, is not as God, the original lawgiver, but as the Sent of God, as his delegate and representative. We are commanded to love Christ, not because he is our God, but because he lived and taught, and suffered and died, to bring us to God, and God is the Being whom we must ulti mately thank for what Christ has done for us. Prayer is the chief means of the increase of piety. Our hearts are kindled to devotion, when we contem plate one Infinite and All-perfect Father of the uni verse, whose wisdom devised and whose power cre ated this mighty system of things. We conceive of him as the Father of our spirits, the changeless source of spiritual being, from which we came and to which we tend, and we can worship him with the profoundest gratitude, and look up to him with unbounded confidence. But we are incapable of holding intercourse with a tri-personal God. We cannot even conceive of the possibility of his exist ence. Our minds are distracted, our faith is con founded, and devotion itself becomes the source of mental discord and contradiction, instead of the cause of tranquility, peace and consolation. We know not 24 what we worship until we worship God as one per son, one mind, one intelligence, one God and Father of all. For these causes, we solemnly dedicate this house to the worship of the only living and true God, in the name of Jesus Christ. We acknowledge him as the only proper Object of religious homage. We deny that it can be lawfully paid to any other. We acknowledge him as the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, the God of the prophets, the God whom Christ worshipped, and to whom he taught his followers to pray, to whom he ascended after his resurrection, and whom he called his Father, and our Father, his God and our God. We dedicate it to him, because he is the only Being and the only Person who sustains the relation of God to us ; because it is in him we live and move and have our being. All that we are he has made us, all that we have he has given us, all that we can ever hope to receive must come from his infinite ful ness. We dedicate it to that Being to whom our Saviour taught us to pray as our Father in heaven, because we have no assurance that any other being or person can hear us or answer our prayers, and because it would be a derogation from his sole Deity and Infinite Majesty to pray to any other object. We dedicate it in the name of Jesus Christ, because we would acknowledge before God and before the world, our faith in Jesus Christ as the only Mediator between God and men, as the Mes siah, the Anointed One, whom God filled with his wisdom and clothed with his power, and endowed 25 with every attribute which was necessary to consti tute him the all-sufficient Saviour of the world. We consecrate this church to the teaching of his most holy Gospel, as our sufficient rule of faith and prac tice, hoping that thus " he of God may be made unto us wisdom, righteousness and sanctification." On this altar may the fire of true devotion be kin dled, and never suffered to go out. From this sanc tuary may the sacrifice of prayer come up acceptably before God. Here, from pure lips, may that word of God go forth which never returneth to him void. Here may there be planted that tree of life whose leaves are for the healing of the nation. Here may it be known that the fountain of living water is opened by the living verdure of true piety which shall spring up and spread around it. Here, with a true zeal and holy purpose, may parents consecrate their children to God. Here, with reverent, penitent and obedient hearts, may the followers of Christ sur round the emblems of his dying love, and grow into his likeness, while they meditate upon his teaching, his sufferings and his death. Here may successive generations come up from the toil and dust of this world to sit with Christ in hea venly places, and lift their thoughts and aspirations to the celestial mansions, and as slow revolving years undermine the foundation of this earthly tabernacle, fix their hearts and their hopes on that better habita tion, that house of God not made with hands eternal in the heavens. Amen. 08867 8488