YALE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY AN ESSAY ''ON MAN; OB THE MORTAL BODY, AND THE IMMORTAL SOUL, WHEREIN ARE DEVELOPED THE INCONTROVERTIBLE PRINCIPLES CHRISTIANITY. BY GEORGE WIRGMAN. MpVl3 LONDON : Priuted by Coe and Moore, 27, Old Change. 1898. TO HIS MOST GRACIOUS MAJESTY KING GEORGE THE FOURTH; TO THE LORDS SPIRITUAL AND TEMPORAL; AND TO THE ELECTED COMMONERS (Stoat Britain ant) Infant). (CONSTITUTING THE SUPREME LEGISLATURE OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE) THIS WORK IS DEDICATED, BY THEIR DEVOTED SUBJECT, AND MOST OBEDIENT SERVANT, GEORGE WIRGMAN. PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS. Several years have elapsed since I ventured to submit to the public, the result of my reflections on subjects which I consider to be intimately connected with the welfare of the British empire. How far my first efforts have suc ceeded, it is not for me to determine ; indeed, it may be presumptuous to expect, that an humble individual, uncon nected with party, could so far interest statesmen, and lawgivers, as to induce them to study a work, which pro fesses to exhibit new views of the system on which govern ments are constructed; for, it cannot have escaped the observation of the considerate, that opinions, however cor rect, which assume an air of novelty, or demand the sacrifice of old prejudices, require much time, and study, before they can take full possession of the mind. In presenting this section of my literary labours to the consideration of the reflective portion of mankind, it may be desirable to notice the course of study that has operated so powerfully on my mind, as to induce me to combat in silence, with many difficulties, regardless of general apathy, or indifference. The importance of elucidating the character of man, as a physical and moral being, became more and more appa rent, as I proceeded in the study of the Science of VI PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS. GOVERNMENT; and an attentive perusal of the NBW Testament convinced me, that the Almighty has endued man with innate laws, which teach him the grand disti uc tion between fight and wrong, good wtAevil; moreover, I clearly perceived the pure essence of Christianity to be strictly SPIRITUAL,, consequently within the - mind; and I ascertained, that it may be viewed" as a sublime or sys tematic whole, independently of the historical narratives contained in the Gospels. In order' to obtain this inward knowledge, I pursued the study of the mind, as expounded by ImMANUEL Kant, and persevered, until I comprehended the three grand f& wd-" ties-'— serascj understanding, and reason; which enabled me to discriminate, with accuracy, and thus detect those fallacious modes of reasoning, and false conclusions, which frequently lead men into the most glaring contradictions, and palpable absurdities. By this process, I was ulti mately led to results which I shall ever contemplate^with satisfaction and delight ; because they have enabled rae to comprehend the true basis on which the pure doctrines of Christianity rest for Support; viz. THE TRINITY IN Human Nature. This study has had the effect of satisfying all my reli gious scruples, of clearing up many points that were doubt ful, and of removing those mental obstacles, which formerly^ appeared insuperable. Thus relieved in my own miad, I feel it to be an imperative duty, to sacrifice my time, and pecuniary means, in the expectation of imparting tbjb like consolation to others, and thus promote the gradual ame lioration of mankind. In the latter portion of this work, p. 139,IhaVeexhib;ed PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS. vii a parallel between the results derived from Kant's doctrine, and the incontrovertible truths of Christianity, as taught by Christ and his Apostles : this portion of the work, will, I trust, be found worthy the serious consideration, and mature reflection, of those who are engaged in the import ant duty of Christian instruction. In furtherance of my views, I am at present engaged in another work, in which I have arranged a plan, com prehending the ground-work, or rudiments, of the Chris tian religion, from the only unquestionable authority, — the Gospel of Christ; which, I sincerely hope, may tend to the '-^troduction of an universal creed, — off a creed that is not susceptible of doubt, or uncertainty. It is generally admitted, that, ImmanuelKant was the most able metaphysician that Germany ever produced ; but, notwithstanding his fame as a scholar, and his unim- peached character as a man ; he has not escaped attack from those who view metaphysical inquiries as compara tively useless, not to say dangerous. Does a good man think of God — -of his glorious attributes — of heaven — of eternity — of eternal life? All these are metaphysical or spiritual contemplations ; in other words, they have no con nexion with, or relation to, physical or material objects. Thus, it is evident, that the objectors to metaphysics be come metaphysicians themselves, when occupied with such reflections; which consideration should induce them to renounce their prejudices, and search inwardly for the truth. Kant has clearly pointed out the extent of our powers of mind, andfully ascertained, what we can actually know, and what we cannot know, in our present limited state of exist- viii preliminary observations. ence ; and the line of demarcation is so distinctly drawn, that the separation must be apparent to every diligent inquirer. With feelings of the highest respect, and regard, I take this opportunity of acknowledging the assistance I have received from my brother, Mr. Thomas Wirgman ; my old friend, Mr. Henry Richter ; and from my kind friend, Mr. Leigh; and I return them thus publicly, my unfeigned thanks, for the valuable critical observations with which they have favoured me, during the progress of this, (to me,) arduous undertaking; indeed, I have the happiness to know, that they have been actuated by the same disin terested motives, that have influenced my own mind. The references to previous pages, which are dispersed throughout the work, are intended for the use of those who wish more minutely to investigate the operations of the human mind ; to readers generally they will be of little importance. N. B. — For the convenience of the reader, the following heads, relating to the " Essay on Man," are intro duced. Page Human Nature ; or, the Mortal Body, and the Immortal Soul, (the component Properties of Man,) exemplified 44 On the Animal Nature of Man ; or, the Mortal Body 48 On the Moral Nature of Man ; or, the Rational Soul .... 69 On Man, as an accountable Being 96 A Review of the preceding Delineation of Human Nature, which is in Harmony with the Doctrine of Christ and his Apostles ] 39 THIRD SECTION. ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE FIRST THREE PRINCIPLES, OR NATURAL LAWS OF THE SCIENCE OF GOVERNMENT, As promulgated Page 15, Section I. IN the Exposition of " Kant's Moral Philosophy" given in a preceding Section, I have developed that portion of the Rudi ments of the Science of Metaphysics which I deemed requisite, in order to enable me to elaborate or expound the Science of Government. In the course of the present Section, it will be necesssary more fully to illustrate that Exposition, for the purpose of rendering the whole as intelligible as the subject will permit, without oral instruction. ¦ In this highlyrfavoured land the art of government has been more strictly examined, and more closely studied, than in any pther country on the face of the globe ; and its present state of perfection may be attributed not only to the energy of the first families in the hingdom, but to the co-operation of the indepen dent of all classes of the people, who,' in many instances, have resolutely sealed the bond of freedom with their blood : these consideration;, induce me to hope that the present attempt to 38 develope the Science of Government will excite some degree of interest in the public mind. Government, which comprehends Sovereign Power, arises from the necessity of protecting property and persons, and is calculated to produce the well-being of the people under its con trol, consequently, to promote contentment, which is the basis of human happiness. In a course of lectures delivered at the Philomathic Institu tion, for the purpose of elucidating Kant's Moral Philosophy, I explained the various propositions contained in Section II., which I propose publishing as an appendix to t-his work, for the benefit of those readers who may be desirous of searching deeply into the Science of Morals and of Government, the operations of which are simultaneous. To keep the subject under discussion within the immediate view of the reader, -it will be necessary to recapitulate the First Three Principles. 1. Man is a Being possessed of two distinct Natures, the Animal or Physical, and the Moral or Rational. 2. The instinct and necessity of his physical nature constrain him to supply the wants, and to gratify the desires of that nature. 3. The dictates of his moral nature operate to direct and control his physical nature, and originate in him rights, duties, and moral and religious sentiments. The acute reasoner will perceive that these three principles are grounded on the human mind itself, or on the metaphysical study of man ; for, we cannot reason on the innate powers or laws of the mind without diving into metaphysics, by which term I mean the very opposite oi physics ; which last is the study of things that become manifest to us through the medium of the knowing faculty, comprising sense, understanding, and speculative reason. The science of metaphysics, on the contrary, treats of objects, or ideas of pure reason, that are boundless as infinity, and not attainable through the organs of sense, and may justly be termed the science of the soul, therefore the knowledge resulting is Rational or Metaphysical. 39 St. Paul clearly points out the great utility of the study of this science, which comprehends the essential doctrine of Chris - tiaaity, truths " spiritually discerned," the attributes of omni potence, and the innate powers or laws of the human mind ; for, he informs the converts to Christianity, that " the invisible things of God, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal Power and Godhead." — (Rom. i. 20.) St. Paul here refers to sound conclusions of reason that enable us to see mentally into the Region of Infinity, which is out of the limits of physical nature : these conclusions are most decidedly metaphysical knowledge deduced from our reasoning soul. For example : our knowledge of physical or sensible things, which are governed by the laws of Cause and Effeft, Action and Re action, &c, determines us, after much inward reflection, to believe that there is a God, the Creator of the Universe, in a different medium from Time and Space, where all is limited, that is, had a beginning and will have an end ; and that his power, justice, and mercy are infinite ; and we ascribe to the Creator attributes that our reason teaches us are component parts of the Godhead. Other metaphysical knowledge is derived from the same source. For example : Time is the limit and repository of physical nature, and can only contain physical properties ; and, that Time is distinct from Eternity, the mansion of God, the eternal Father ! All pure universal ideas of reason are metaphysical, such as the attributes of the Godhead, pure liberty and equality, and imprescriptible and unalienable rights : there can be no physical property in these, for they are not susceptible of division into parts, which all physical properties are, even thought, sound, and internal feelings, for even these are divisible into portions of certain duration. The mere act of thinking of infinite ideas of reason must not be mistaken for ideas themselves, for it is simply an operation of the mind within time. Our knowledge of " God, the Father Almighty, maker of heaven and earth," is metaphysical j for St, John says, "No 40 man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten Son which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him."— (John i. 18.) And in another place, he says, " No man hath seen God at any time. If we love one another God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us. Hereby know we that we dwell in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit." — (1 John iv. 12 and 13.) This communion with the Almighty is within the definition of Metaphysics, and can only be attained through the divine portion of Man, his immortal Soul, the seat of Rea son, which, as before observed (page 18), is the connecting link between Man and his Maker. This communion with the Almighty, whether it be by devout prayer or thanksgiving, or by the holy fervour of the soul, ascending through the divine Spirit, Conscience, to the throne of God, is that powerful impulse, that approximation towards the will of God through the " Holy Ghost," or divine Spirit within us, that is exemplified by our conformity to the dictates of the pure Moral Law ; or, as expressed by St. John, " If we love one another, God dwelleth in us, and we in him." We must bear in mind that the word love, as used by St. John, comprehends a performance of our social and moral duties. It is highly important that this truth be well understood, for the spiritual essence of the Christian doctrine, "The being born again " through faith in God's mercy, is grounded on it. Christ said to Nicodemus, " Except a man be born again he cannot see the kingdom of God ; that which is born of the flesh is flesh ; and that which is born of the Spirit is Spirit." — (John iii. 3 and 6.) Denoting, that flesh is of one nature, and spirit of another, and that they cannot be amalgamated ; their operation on each other produces human nature, for corrupt physical matter can not become incorruptible spirit; they are distinct, and in separate states — one is literally body, the other essentially soul. The being born again, or the new birth, must be viewed in a figurative sense ; it is the triumph of the reasoning soul over the lusts of the flesh, or it is the moral law within us, (St. Paul's " Law of God,") purifying and regenerating man. \ We are born into a sinful world with violent passions, carnal 41 desires, and physical wants; counterpoised by a spiritual moni tor, conscience, within the region of the soul ; to which we can apply for moral instruction to purify our carnal nature, and to direct us to a virtuous course of life: this " Holy Spirit!" this . pure emanation from God ! does not become our secret director, nor does it control vice, until we are persuaded of the frailty of the flesh, and are conscious that we have acted dia metrically opposite to the dictates of the moral law, or in oppo sition to the will of God. . Repentance, whereby we forsake sin, must then take place, and inward prayers for forgiveness be resorted to with a devout mind ; we must be determined to lead a new and virtuous life with a lively faith in God's mercy : this determination firmly adhered to, is the new birth unto righteousness, for we are hereby made partakers of happiness derived from virtue, by the all-powerful influence of the " Holy Spirit," or grace of God. The New Birth does not damp the enjoyment of happiness on earth, nor deprive us of the good things of this world, the boun ties of nature, but rather enjoins a moderate use of them, and a just distribution, aided by benevolence and charity, which the doctrine of Christ inculcates — for he taught us to love one another, to be merciful in our judgments, to forgive our enemies, and to put our trust in God. Christ and his Apostles seldom contemplated the. animal nature of man ; therefore, it is .most desirable thoroughly to comprehend his' moral or divine * nature, which is a metaphysical * The word divine is here used philosophically. When the Kantesian Exposition of the immortal soul of man is comprehended, we shall not believe the Soul to be any part of physical nature, although a component property of human nature, consequently not subject to duration within Time, the repository of sensible things. We shall believe it to be the divinb spiritual influence of the creator, working on the Animal Nature of Man, in proportion to his devout meditation, or ardent re searches within his spiritual soul, which is ever in its immortal state; for, " Ask, and it shall be given to you ; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you." — (Luke ii. 9.) The essence of the Soul, is, in other words, the pure Moral Law within 42 inquiry ; otherwise our minds may be so occupied with material notions, that we shall not be enabled clearly to understand the spiritual doctrines expounded in the writings of the Apostles. The studious and reflective in all ages have been engaged in searching inwardly for the innate laws of the human mind, being prepossessed with a feeling that all the works of omnipotence proceed according to immutable order, and on scientific prin ciples : this study is metaphysical, because it is not grounded on sensible representations. Their object has been> to erect a system of morals on such a basis as shall demonstrate the innate principles in man that deter* mines the will to good or evil. Immanuel Kant having accom plished this-great work, to him we are indebted for the' develop ment of the Science of Morals ; its practical application should be the peculiar employment of divines and teachers generally, for the essence of Christianity being pure truth, moral doctrine is the obvious result. . The study of the art or government in all its bearings, is, in fact, the physical and metaphysical study of man. I shall, in the course of these inquiries, strive to develope the natural laws of that art ; or, at all events, lay the foundation upon which legislators and philosophers, who have" hitherto failed in their attempts to explore the Science of Government, may safely build I consider the cause of former failures in this study to have arisen from the lack of science in teaching and exemplifying the two distinct natures of man. Christ and his Apostles ex pounded (in their divine teaching) these two natures very dis tinctly, and taught us, that they are in separate states ; the body or animal nature within this corrupt mortal state, and the soul or us, St. Paul's " Law of God," which is grounded on- pure reason; and when corrupt human nature is controlled and directed to the path of duty it is the Divine Spirit (or Conscience) that operates ;. and we are then as declared by St. John, in communion with God ! for, he is in tts, and we are in Mm;'' meaning, that our Animal and Moral Natures are in mutual harmony, which is exemplified by our love to mankind, which expres-- sion comprehends not only a just but a charitable performance of our duties to one another. 43 moral nature in- an immortal state, beyond the limits of man's power. Our moral and religious reflections, and the events of social life, cannot fail to impress on us, and familiarize to our reason, man as a moral being, and man as an animal being ; which are usually distinguished by the terms soul and body. The ordinary routine of education inculcates very confused notions on this vital subject, and it is seldom that much science (which is the grounds of reasoning) is resorted to for the purpose of satisfying the inquiring mind, that from these two natures in mystical connexion proceeds a third, denominated human na ture j which comprises the principles of good and evil, and constitutes man an accountable being. I shall strictly investigate these important truths, for they are of momentous consequence to my inquiry into the true principles that govern buman nature, and are interwoven with the meta physical and physical sciences (which comprehend the practical operations of politics, morality, and religion,) and may with pro priety be denominated the sciences of the immortal soul and mortal body, for the laws that govern both sciences are disco verable in the human mind. 44 HUMAN NATURE; OR, THE MORTAL BODY, AND THE IMMORTAL SOUL, (The component Properties of Man.) EXEMPLIFIED. In attempting to unfold human nature on scientific principles, I shall endeavour to render the text intelligible to those readers who will spare time, and exert the faculties of their minds to comprehend it. All existing things, or natural objects, that is, all things that we become acquainted with through the medium of our Senses are physical, and under the control of the Laws of Nature, or of Physics. The human body, and all objects in nature, both animate and inanimate, are of this description. The animal, vegetable, and mineral productions that are nourished by the earth, (which, in an extended view, comprises the three essen tial physical properties, Air, Fire, and Water,) grow or advance in the order designed by the Creator, to their final period of duration in Time, under the control of the Laws, Cause and Effect, Action and Re-action, &c. : when that period arrives a change takes place, and they return to earth, or become first a new physical effect, then a physical cause of other effects. A striking analogyjs observable in the organization of Animal and Vegetable Life ; each genus is gifted by the Creator with powers and functions adapted to its wants, desires, and neces sities, and being of the nature of earth becomes sustenance for other species and genera ; such appears to be the pre-ordained order of nature. The necessary basis, or the medium of this life, is Earth, Air, Fire, and Water, which produce and sustain all physical properties in conformity with the Laws of Nature. Experience has taught us that only animal and vegetable matter are adapted to support human life, but that mineral and earthy productions may be used medicinally as correctives and restoratives. 45 Those readers who are conversant with physical events, and with the organization of Animal and Vegetable Matter (in cluding Man), must have noticed the scientific arrangement and disposition of the various organs, how exactly they are adapted to perform their requisite functions ; and, although we cannot distinctly comprehend the utility and design of those terrific visitations of Providence, extreme heat, extreme cold, lightning, tempest, plague, pestilence, and famine, yet we must believe that these physical operations are ordained by the Omnipotent Creator in furtherance of the great end proposed. • The roots, fibres, branches, &c, of the vegetable produc tions through which earthy sustenance, the support of life is circulated, bear a strong affinity to the organs, veins, muscles, &c., of the Animal Kingdom, which are expaessly adapted to the same purposes ; with this difference, that the vegetable is sustained immediately from the earth, and the animal mediately, its sustenance having possessed life, either animal or vegetable. The systematic machinery of all the works of God, which we have successfully inspected and made ourselves acquainted with, denotes the precision with which means are adapted to ends. The various kinds of physical powers possessed by different species, their adaptation to the ends in view, by the predestined organi sation of the physical machinery of each, unfold to us the powers Nof the Creator, independent of the main spring to action, natu ral or physical instinct, tvants, and desires , to which tendencies or properties of Nature, we shall trace the love of life, and of the strong physical desires, operating under the direction of the Laws of Cause and Effect, Action and Re-action, &c. Much scientific application and great labour, as well as extra ordinary activity of mind and body, have been applied for ages, to the close examination of physical properties, by experiments and illustrations j and it is evident, that vegetables have one mode of obtaining sustenance, and animals another, each have their wants ; but in failure of obtaining earthy sustenance,- life becomes extinct, and the once living thing becomes decomposed and returns to its mother earth, which it nourishes in its turn. The mortal body is continually under the active and scientific exami- 46 nation of the Anatomical and Medical schools, and the labours of Professors have enabled'them to produce a great mass of sound practical knowledge. The school op Theology, should not only comprehend the active labours and devout meditations of its spiritual Pastors, but it Should clearly interpret the spiritual truths of Christianity. Unfortunately, it has suffered the metaphysical study of the immortal Soul, (the " Spiritual body" of St. Paul,) that has to account in another world, for the transgressions of the flesb, to be in great measure lost ; or to become so entangled with physical or material notions, that the spiritual doctrine of the apostles, and of the early fathers of the Christian Church, has nearly become extinct : indeed, the routine of College Education for Church preferment, has become anything but Christian ; con sequently the pure spiritual teaching of the Apostles, (Relics of which have been preserved to us in their Epistles,) has in a great degree evaporated, or at least degenerated ; for modern teachers of Christianity prefer entering deeply into logical disquisitions, and historical relations. The celebrated Paley, in his Moral Philosophy, (book vi. ch. 10.) says, " Now it must be remembered, that Christianity is an historical Religion, founded on facts which are related to have passed, upon discourses which were held, and letters which were written, in a remote age, and distant country of the world, as well as under a state of life and manners, and during the prevalency of opinions, customs, and institutions, very unlike any which are found amongst mankind at present."* This is a very insufficient definition of the basis on which to rest the immutable truths of pure Christianity j for it implies that the pure, therefore holy doctrine of Christ and his Apostles, rests solely on the belief of certain recorded facts, recorded too, only; in the writings of the first teachers of Christianity. God forbid 1 that the pure Religion of Christ should depend on the belief of certain occurrences, which did not even obtain general * In quoting so high an authority, we must do Paley the justice to observe, that in his Moral Philosophy, he has confined himself within those strict limits, from which he departed when writing on the Evidences of Christianity. 47 belief in that peaceful and enlightened agej for were that the case, instead of teaching pure Christianity, we should be daily employed, in striving to instil the belief of certain partial relations ; * and instead of leading the mind to a knowledge of God's Kingdom, we should be distracting it, by studying evi dences founded on human testimony j a study the more distressing, because not susceptible of demonstration, but, on the contrary, liable to engender doubts, which can only be determined by that highest tribunal of human nature. Reason. In ages of ignorance, the temporal Heads of the Roman Catholic Chur,ch, grounded some of their tenets on the belief of certain physical occurrences ; thus confounding the belief of certain events with morality and religion, a most injudicious and unstable ground-work for a universal cregd ; more particu larly, as we are prohibited in various texts of Scripture, from judging one another. I shall distinctly shew, in another section, that the Apostles did not found the primitive Church on such fragile materials, but on that immutable, holy doctrine, that is not of this world : that, which is neither upheld by miracle, nor by history, nor by any earthly authority, but which must draw forth conviction from the soul; being a Divine Revelation through the medium of Jesus Christ, to the pure reason of Man : in other words, the spiritual influence of God, pervading the human race. It shall be my endeavour to extricate the pure Christian doctrine from the obscurity in which it has been involved by commentators, for more than a thousand years j and to. lay the. foundation of a School of Theology, which will, by degrees, enlighten Christian teachers, eradicate heresy anW schism, and introduce pure Christian doctrines, under the administration of as many Christian communities, or different Church governments, as the will of Man, in accordance with physical circumstances, may authorize. On reference to St. Paul's Epistle to the Hebrew,?, chapters vii. viii. and ix. we shall find, that the pure spirit * : — •¦ . ¦¦' ¦' ¦ ¦" * Belief in any recorded event, cannot be synonymous with Virtue and Religion. We believe certain relations because we have, or consider that we have, good rational grounds for believing them to be true ; or because we have been taught in our youth, and by public example, to believe them to be true. 48 of Christianity, the communion of the soul with God, must necessarily elevate us in idea to another world : where the High Priest of the Universal Christian Church sitteth at the right hand of God. No supreme temporal head was ever appointed to govern his Church on earth ; consequently, each Christian com munity or particular church establishment, must appoint its own temporal head. ON THE ANIMAL NATURE OF MAN, OR, THE MORTAL BODY. The incontrovertible position, that we can know nothing beyond the limits of our mind, leads to the conclusion, that all we know of the mortal body is within the mind ; and that those who have acquired the greatest portion of sound knowledge, must be best able to prescribe for its wants, and administer to its necessities. ' Moreover, all we know of the itnmortal soul is within the mind ; and those who have most earnestly directed their serious attention to the consideration of that object, and separated in thought, the pure moral doctrine of the soul, (St. Paul's " Law of God,") from the impure desires of the flesh, (St. Paul's " Law of Sin,") are best able to prescribe, what will be most conducive to happiness here and hereafter. Immanuel Kant having clearly developed the two natures of Man, and discovered practical rules for the attainment of this knowledge, which fully illustrates the nature of the Body and of the Soul, and the divine truths before alluded toj I deem it essential to direct the reader's attention, to the practical working of these innate powers or Laws of the Mind, as laid down in the Exposition of Kant's Moral Philosophy, (page 17,) which will lead to the desired end. That we can know nothing beyond the limits of our mind, is a position which forms the ground-work, or corner stone of a moral structure, that must eventually produce the greatest influence on man. This position being admitted, we cannot conceive it possible to examine the cause out of the mind, that 49 operates on the senses j for the mind produces om judgments right er wrong, which are synonymous with our knowledge of things; and we cannot fail to discover, that our knowledge of things varies, as our judgments become more or less correct. That we possess more than one kind of knowledge must be admitted ; and that the human mind consists of the three great faculties, Sense, Understanding, and Reason, is equally evident. Sense produces intuitive or actual knowledge. Understanding produces conceptive or intellectual knowledge. Reason produces ideal or rational knowledge. These three kinds of knowledge are the production of very different powers or laws of the mind. The acquirement of a knowledge of their limits and modes of action, will enable us to use our Reason with sound moral judgment, Unust tend to check superstition, lead to a purer course of life ^ consequently, to moral reformation. Without fear of contradiction, I here state, what must be considered an indisputable fact : The instant our senses are affected by a cause without the mind, a judgment is necessarily drawn forth, or produced by the active powers of the mind, which constitutes actual knowledge, (see that head, page 20:) and moreover, it will appear, that our judgments are not impressed on the mind by the noumenon, or cause without, that operates through the medium of the organs of sense, but that they are as variable as our wills, or the motives that prompt us to judge, and are as frequently wrong as right ; which inevitably brings us to the conclusion, that the correctness or certainty of our know ledge of the phenomena of nature, whilst under the test of actual inspection, is very problematical. Nature, (or natural objects,) in the estimation of each individual is, whatever the mind deter mines it to be at the instant, and we have no other test, by which we are enabled to know what it is. It is impossible to be otherwise ; for we cannot form a judgment, when sensibly affected, without affixing to the sensations received our store of acquired knowledge that applies to, or fits the object under consideration ; consequently, mental acquirements, the result of former activity of mind, are principal features in all physical 50 knowledge, which must necessarily differ, as our capacities, our acquired knowledge, our motives, and our reasoning powers, (the use of which being discretional,) differ in their capabilities and application ; which become actively useful, or otherwise, as they may, or may not have been judiciously exercised. The examination of this single operation of the mind, has led the most acute reasoners into the very depths of metaphysical research, in the hope of exploring the science of the Mind. Kant has defined this science, the rudiments of which are fully explained in Section II. j his great merit consists in distinguishing the Cause or Noumenon out of the Mind, from the Effect or phenomenon within the Mind ; that is, in determining the portion of natural objects produced by the Mind, and the portion that is independent of the Mind j allowing to the Mind all the knowledge acquired or produced by its active powers, which knowledge is ever varying ; and to the things in themselves which are independent of the Mind, and which never vary j all that is distinct or separate from the Mind, namely, the outward cause of sensible appearances, the Noumenon. It has already been observed, that we possess three distinct kinds of knowledge, which are within the boundaries of the Mind, and which cannot be amalgamated or mixed up with the Noumenon or cause out of the Mind : consequently, no part of that knowledge, can be truly denominated the thing in itself independent of the Mind. Il would be departing from the main object of these contem plations, were I to attempt fully to elucidate the abstruse points under the head Sense, (page 21,) nor would it yield much profit to the studious reader ; who would find oral tuition requisite to prevent erroneous conclusions, to keep his mind free from confu sion, and to induce him to proceed satisfactorily. I will nevertheless offer to the reader, an enlarged and corrected copy of an Essay presented to the Philomathic Institution, con taining a review of the Animal Nature of Man, — a summing up of the heads Sense and Understanding, elucidated in the Course of Lectures 1 had the honour of delivering before that very laudable Institution. 51 AN ESSAYON KANT'S PHILOSOPHY OF falND, dedicated TO THE DIRECTORS OF THE PHILOMATHIC INSTITUTION, BY THEIR CORRESPONDING MEMBER, ¦ GEORGE. WIRGMAN. In the concluding observation on the exposition of Kant's Moral Philosophy, (page 36,) I stated my motrve for deferring the definitions of Time and Space. Thechain of reasoning throughout the lectures having developed the Natures of the Receptivities alluded to in Position D, to be Actual Time, and Actual Space ; it is now essentially necessary to your further progress in the Science, that I submit to you the following definitions 5 which I trust will be considered self-evident to the studious inquirer, who has regularly attended the lectures. Time is Succession, Space is Extension. These definitions are judgments of the mind, and come under the general explication of knowledge, (see page 20.) Intuitive or Actual Time, is the present time, which is the only existing time ; it is inseparable from our Sense, and it is the Receptivity or Repository of our sensitive faculty, for in it we find all sensible objects, or things we actually know. Conceptive Time, is only the conception, or notion we have in our mind of past and future time ; and of time present to other sentient beings, though not present to us ; for we cannot contem plate a sentient being, who has not a present time of his own, which contains the existing things he knows 5 none of which con ceptions of time can be actual time to us. Ideal Time, is our notion of infinite time, which cannot be conceived as actual or present. Intuitive or Actual Space is that extension that is within 52 the limit of our Sense, or within the grasp of our Senses : it is the Receptivity or Repository of our sensitive faculty, and cannot be separated from it, for in it we find all sensible objects or things we actually know, that possess co-existing parts. Conceptive Space is only the conception, or notion we have of an extension in which all things existed in former time, and in which all things will exist hereafter ; likewise the necessary con ception of an extension not actually present to us, but which is actual toother sentient beings, and contains the objects present to their senses. Ideal Space is our notion of infinite extension ; which has neither beginning nor end, and which cannot be conceived within any actual space. DEDUCTIONS. First. Actual Time and Space, the (holders of sensible things,) being essential to, and inseparable from our Sense, mustbe identical with our Sense : which is a receptive or passive faculty, consisting of two repositories for Objects of Sense. Secondly. Objects of Sense, or things of experience, only exist in Actual Time, and Actual Space ; or in the Receptivities, or Repositories of each sentient being j therefore, the mystical causes of these existences (the noumena) are distinct from them, and not within Actual Time and Space ; where they, we could define them, which it is not in our power to do ; consequently they are beyond the reach of the human intellect, or of actual knowledge. If we can know nothing beyond the limits of the mind, (see page 20,) and we can really know all within Actual Time and Space, our minds are co-extensive with time and Space ; for they contain all the sensible things we can inspect or analyze ; which things are necessarily within the sensitive faculty of the mind during the period of mental inspection. The first impression within the mind is Sensation, which is received through the medium of the organs of sense, and is the unalterable ground work of Intuitions, or of sensible things, and of Actual Knowledge. 53 On analyzing our Sensations, we find them clothed with the forms of the Receptivities or Repositories, for they are invariably reducible to parts in extension and to parts in succession, which are the exact representations of Time and Space; as fully explained in the Lectures. Intuitions, or sensible things, in other words phenomena or objects of nature, are constituted by the active powers of the under standing producing their determined form or properties, while the Noumenon operates on our sense; and Intuitive or Actual Knowledge is obtained by analyzing objects of nature, by means of the judging powers of the understanding. Our knowledge of these objects varies, as our judgments varv, which are directed or biassed by motives. Were these objects the things in themselves, independent of the min#, (the Noumena,) they would imprint in our minds fac-similes of themselves, and their appearances would not be ever varying in our minds, as experience proves Objects of Nature ever do. If the mind were inactive in producing Objects of Sense or Phenomena of Nature, the frequent disagreement with regard to matters of fact would not prevail. The state of the case is simply as follows, — from habit and a certainty that there is something out of the mind; we are accustomed to consider Natural Objects as they appear to us, or rather, as our judgments have determined them, (for their appear ances vary with every change of opinion;) things in themselves independent of, or out of the mind. Close reasoning will make it evident, that we only fancy the objects or appearances of Nature to be out of the mind, or transfer in error, our Actual Knowledge (right or wrong,) to a something out of the mind, to the Noumenon; as the Dog in the fable did, when he let drop the meat within his mouth, to grasp at its shadow ; we imagine or conclude, that the form (the properties and qualities) which the understanding gives to the sensations or matter received', is the thing out of the mind, which is undefinalle, because it is out of the mind: Until our mental powers or activities can operate beyond the confines of Sense, how can we actually inspect other 54 things, than those within our sensitive faculty; for the things that each of us actually know, only exist in the Repositories of our separate minds ; and to be enabled actually to know other things, for example, things in Calcutta, and in the Northern Regions, we must absolutely have them within our individual Time and Space, or within our sensitive faculty ; which would require us to undertake a voyage to India, and another to the North Pole, otherwise we can only have Conceptive Knowledge of them. We must really allow the mind the full expanse of actual Time and Space, for the acquirement of Physical Knowledge ; and for. Metaphysical Knowledge, the region of infinity ; and disconnect or separate it from our notions of physical matter, (or sensation,) which is only the first effect or impression received within the mind ; otherwise the reasoning and spiritual doctrine of Christ and the Apostles, cannot be rationally interpreted. The gospel encourages us to dive into our spiritual or divine nature, and, teaches us that the Spirit of God dwelleth within the soul, or the reasoning faculty of the mind of man. The Mind comprehends the moral law, or " Law of God," as well as the " Law of Sin;" in truth it is that in human nature, that contains the principles of Good and Evil, the divine Spirit within the confines of reason, in connection with the animal wants and desires within the confines of sense. Intuitions or sensations necessarily propel the active powers of the understanding, to determine the form of the matter re ceived ; which form and matter are the phenomena or objects of nature in the mind; this is the original use of Understanding: but no actual knowledge is derived therefrom, until a mental analysis of the phenomena of nature, or of sensible things, takes . place, which is a logical use of understanding. We then find by. our immediate judgments, that every thing in actual time and space, the repositories for sensible matter, is reducible to the categories; except the sensible parts, which are synonymous with sensation or matter, and are the first effects within the receptive faculty of the mmd, (Sense.) It is impossible to retain these. 55 parts when the noumenon ceases to operate; yet all the properties constituted by the mind may be retained. We cannot fail to observe, that actual knowledge and actual things are so nearly allied, that it is only mentally that we can separate them, by abstracting the properties conferred by the understanding, and treasuring them in the memory ; where they will be retained, when the sensible parts disappear, or are absent from our time and space, or our sensitive faculty. It is remark able and worthy of observation, that every existing thing com prises the categories or laws of nature, or of physics, which are to be found in the mind of man ; certainly not in rocks and stones, or the phenomena of nature. We have no pretence for maintaining, that the things of our experience are not constituted by the mind;*it would outrage sound reason to assert, that they are things in themselves inde pendent of the mind. We will put a case, and suppose that objects of nature are independent of, and not within the mind ; how does it happen that they are one thing at one time, and a different thing at another, and that they vary in every particular, as our judgments vary ? In truth, they are not to be distinguished from whatever appearance our judgments confer on them, how ever We may err ; if this be the case, is it possible to determine how much of them is the produce of the mind, and how much the thing out of the mind ? The mind is the only test of our know ledge of anything, and stamps the appearances of nature, on the sensations obtruded on us by noumena, or causes without. In support of this definition of Mind, I refer to the Deduction, page 19, and to the reasoning throughout the course of the Lectures. I feel that you have a just right to put the questions,— what then, are the things in themselves out of the mind ? and — what is the mind in itself ? The things out of the mind, most certainly are not the things of our experience, as our minds have consti tuted them ; for no two of us would determine their properties to be the same in every particular : therefore, the things in them selves out of the mind, cannot be identified with sensible objects, 56 which are the production of the mind, and not distinguishable from our actual or intuitive knowledge of these objects. Our knowing faculty cannot obtain knowledge beyond the limits of our mind j therefore, to attempt to define the mystical cause, or operating power of the Creator, that sets the machinery of the mind in motion, would pot only be most absurd, and a stretch of power wholly out of our element, but a profanation of our highest attribute, Reason. I may safely venture to assert, that mankind never differ as to the fact, that all sensible things must necessa rily comprise parts in succession, and parts in extension, in order to be actually present to our sense ; that is, to be in our individual Time and Space; and, that it is only the judgments we form of sensible things that vary, until we obtain apodictical certainty. In answer to the question, What is the Mind in itself? I will be as explicit as my present acquirements will allow. The more frequently this subject is discussed, the more likely is it to become intelligible : it will not only be simplified, but rendered familiar. Man is the production of the Animal and the Moral Natures, in necessary connection. The Human Mind is most appropriately adapted for his guidance, for it affords him the free choice of the course of action he may please to pursue : it is provided with mental powers, or laws suited to his two very opposite natures ; which St. Paul emphatically denominates " the Law of Sin, and the Law of God." The Sensitive Portion of the Mind is receptive, and receives sensations, or the matter of things, within its receptive faculty, Sense, or within the Repositories of Sense; which must not be mistaken for physical things : the sensations only are the physical things, whose form or properties are determined by the pure activities of the understanding, which are synonymous with the Laws of Physics, or of Nature, and which are discoverable in all the phenomena of Nature, or things of this world. The Moral Portion of the Mind is pure practical reason grounded on the pure moral law, (which is hereafter illustrated,) in other words, the immortal Soul of Man, the spiritual emana- 57 tion from the Deity, which is the throne of conscience, or " the Holy Spirit within us;" consequently, the Human Mind is not physical matter, although in connection with it ; and it has two boundaries, actual Time and Space for its physical or sensible objects, and Infinity for its metaphysical or ideal objects. Further to illustrate this abstruse subject, let us watch the mind and observe its procedure : first, in originating or producing the phenomena of nature to the human mind ; or the objects of nature that immediately affect our Senses: secondly, in analyzing these, objects by the judging powers of the Understanding; we then obtain actual knowledge (right or wrong) which we cannot distinguish from the sensible object; for while we obtain actual knowledge by experiments or immediate judgments, the existing thing must be present to us, and I defy an%- of my readers to determine satisfactorily what portion of the peculiar properties they ascribe to it, is the thing in itself independent of the Mind ; provided they keep in remembrance the fallibility of human nature. For example, all their judgments of an object of nature might be erroneous, and the next time they examined it they might deter mine it to be different in most particulars. If the thing be not present to us, we have only Conceptive knowledge of it, which we have previously obtained and stored in our memory for re production when required. The absent thing does not exist in our Time and Space, therefore we cannot actually know it; if we ever have again the same thing actually to refer to, a change must have occurred in it, even if not perceptible; it must be older, and age materially alters all objects of nature; it first tends towards perfection, and ultimately to decay. We must not imagine that our Conceptions and Conclusions are within our sensitive faculty, Time and Space; they are the production of other faculties of the Mind, of Understanding, and Reason, and possess no sensible parts or properties. It is true, that Understanding and Reason are impelled to activity by sen sations received : for if our Senses were not operated upon by Noumena, the spring or stimulating power would be deficient, and- our conceptive and reasoning powers would be inactive. The • 58 Apostles fully comprehended this distinction; for St. Paul assures us, that the invisible things of God from the Creation are under stood by meditating on the things that are made. Again — Our Receptive Faculty, Sense, is affected from without by the Noumenon, which being out of its receptivities, Time and Space, cannot be defined. This affection or sensation re ceived, partakes of the forms of the Receptivities of the sensitive faculty, which forms are succession and extension, precisely as a cast partakes of the form of its mould ; and it is connected into Intuition by the activity of this faculty of the mind, which instantly propels the activities of the Understanding to constitute or produce the phenomena of nature, by giving form and consis tency to the sensation received ; and the judging powers of the Understanding analyze and determine its nature or properties as well as they can, to render it an intelligible object. But until we obtain apodictical certainty, our judgments (or our actual knowledge) of things are ever variable; that is, the things of experience change in our estimation as often as our judgments or opinions alter, and we have no other criterion of knowing what they are : we cannot view them distinct from the mind, nor sepa rately from our actual knowledge. Intuition, or the operation of physical matter within the mind, by the pre-ordained order of nature, propels its machinery to activity. The twelve active powers of the Understanding, which are denominated the Categories, produce the form, or determine the phenomena of nature or sensible things as they appear to our minds. It is most important that we obtain a cor rect notion of the peculiar nature of the Categories; although they are defined in page 26, it will, nevertheless, be advisable to recur to their essential properties previously to investigating the mode in which they act. The Categories are the innate powers of that great faculty of the mind denominated Understanding, they are the aetion oi that faculty, in other words, the faculty itself. They are observ able in all sound judgments, — in all real knowledge,— in all objects of nature. — Those decisions of the mind that are at variance with 59 the immutable order of the Categories, or the Laws that govern physical objects must be re-considered; and if actual investigation be possible, we should exert ourselves to discover in what particular our judgments are deceived; for it would be impious to infer that we have not erred; therefore, that the immutable order of nature had been departed from in such instances. If we were to indulge in conclusions that are not grounded on the Categories, the sound ness of our minds would be impaired, and superstition would be encouraged. The Categories determine the form or the properties of the sensations received, or rather constitute physical objects as they appear to the mind, which is the only source of experience, and , the only test by which we can determine that things exist; they make objects of nature intelligible to our minds; consequently, the sensible world, or the sensible portion of the world, is limited to the objects that are within the reach of our senses; other portions of the world are Conceptive only. The Categories are synonymous with the Laws of physics or of nature, which generate experience within the Mind; for without its limits our knowing faculty cannot act. The Category Substance and Accident, takes the lead, and determines that a sensible effect exists in the mind ; that is, perdures or lasts in time, as long as the noumenon acts on our Sense, which effect we denominate Substance, or the being ; and it likewise produces the form, or determines the properties or qualities (accidents,) of various descriptions that inhere in the substance; the knowledge of which varies, as our experience varies, that is, as our judgments become more or less correct. The Category Cause and Effect determines, that all sen sible things are Effects, arising from various physical causes, possessing inherent properties or powers, adequate to produce the effect or the successive event in Time. And that those effects necessarily become Causes of various other sensible effects. Thus, as existing things are ever in succession, they are alter nately, effects and causes. The Category Action and Re-action determines, the rela- 60 tive situation of all existing things in Time and Space; that is, their mutual concurrence or orderly association in conformity with the laws that control sensible things. The Category Reality determines, that all sensible things, or objects of sense occupy Time and Space, or are present to our Sense. The Category Negation determines, that objects of sense take up no other part of space, than the part they occupy. The Category Limitation determines, the precise limits sensible things occupy in Space. The Category Unity determines, an object of Sense, to be one single object. The Category Multitude determines, separate and unde fined objects of Sense to be many. The Category Totality determines, an object of Sense to be a whole. Many objects of Sense, when defined, to be a whole. And all objects of Sense to be a whole. These are the nine constitutive Categories, that primarily generate all sensible objects, or appearances of nature to our minds ; and by means of the judging acts we analyze or render them intelligible ; for most assuredly we have no other means or mode of determining, or of knowing what nature is, than by our judgments ,- which are variable till we arrive at apodictical certainty, consequently nature appears as variable to us, as the judgments we form of it. The other three Categories determine, the mode in which things exist, that do or may affect the senses : they cannot exist in contradiction to the Categories, or to the laws that control physics, for they would then be incompatible with physical nature. The Category Possibility determines, that things which do exist, must have been possible, and that things that do not now exist, or are not present to us, may exist, or become sensible objects in some future' Time. The Category Existence determines, that all sensible things actually do exist ; for they are in our present Time, and occupy actual Space. 61 The Category Necessity determines, that during the existence oi seusible things, that is, while the noumenon, or cause without the mind, operates on our ¦sense, they cannot be dispensed with ; therefore they exist necessarily. END OF THE ESSAY". A few extracts from the Lectures, for the purpose of elucida ting the foregoing Essay, may be desirable to many readers, and will render the work more complete. In order clearly to understand that faculty of the human mind, denominated Sense, we must allow it to comprehend actual time and space, and we should ponder again and again, on the fol lowing positions. First. The mind of man possesses powers or laws, which enable it to judge or decide on all things that become manifest to it through the organs of sense ; that is, things which are in actual Time and Space. Secondly. The mind of man could not examine real things, if they were not absolutely within its limits or repositories, (Time and Space,) for until the faculty Sense receives sensations, (the matter of real things,) the powers of the Understanding cannot act, that is, cannot produce the intelligible objects, or things of experience. Things within the repositories of other sentient beings, we cannot actually inspect, but they can, because they are within the limits of their sense. Thirdly. Knowledge that is grounded on objects of nature which are present to us, is Actual or Intuitive Knowledge, the production of the mind . Fourthly. Knowledge that has been handed down to us by tradition or by history, or that we obtain by other sources than by actual inspection, (right or wrong,) if it be grounded on the Categories, and has reference to objects of nature, is Conceptive or Intellectual Knowledge. 62 We may likewise form conceptions of possible things, or oc currences that may happen or become sensible to man in some future time. Conceptions of impossible things, that is, of things or events that are contrary to the divine order observable in the Creation, or in opposition to the Laws of Physics, are contrary to Reason, and not admissible in a well-regulated mind; because not within the pale of the Laws of the Mind. Fifthly. Knowledge that has tio reference to sensible things, or to objects of nature, cannot be successive, or within Time; that is, cannot be progressing to its, end: it must concern another state, (not the mortal,) and can only become known to us by conclusions of Reason. It is Ideal or Rational Know ledge, within the sphere of the Science of Metaphysics, Sixthly. By cdnclusions of Reason we may be convinced, that there must necessarily be a mystical cause or noumenon, beyond the limits of our sense, that operates through the-medium of our senses to produce the phenomena of this sublunary sphere; that is, the objects of nature as they appear to the mind; which are not distinguishable from our actual knowledge) of them ; but in the absurd attempt, actually to define or de monstrate this mystical cause or noumenon, that is not of this world, therefore beyond our powers of inspection, we must neces sarily fail : — we might as well attempt actually to define the Creator. There must be a most powerful affinity between actual Time and Space, and Sense: they cannot mentally be viewed asunder, for they are the holders or receptivities of the objects of Sense. Present or actual Time, the only time that really exists, is in separable from our sense; Time and Things, absent to our Sense, cannot be in existence as far as we are individually concerned : they are not demonstrable to us; we may entertain conceptions of them as absent from our Sense, or from our present Time, for the expressions are synonymous ; but conceptions are very different from actual knowledge. U will be indispensably requisite to consider the actual Time /ind actual Space (in which we find all things of experience) to be 63 properties of each of our minds; for our minds produce or consti tute our experience, or the objects of nature as we know. them. The opinion that actual Time and Space are the unlimited, infinite, and unfathomable properties of the Creation, independent of the sensitive faculty, rests on a mistaken conception of the mind of man. Reason possesses the power of extending all judgments to the infinite; but when we are examining sensible things or appearances, we must keep our notions within the compass of the things, within the repositories that contain them, namely, actual Time and. Space. When we say a friend is present, we mean present in time, or present to our senses at this time, which is the only actual Time ; past and future time are not in existence; we can only conceive them, not really know them. A friend who is not present to our sense at this time, is of course absent from our actual time, and we can really know nothing positive respecting him. We can conjecture or form conceptions regarding him, founded on sound judgments, which yet may err: we must at all events conceive, if he be alive, that there is a present time connected with his Sense ; indeed, inseparable from it, the Repository for his sensible objects; but Time present to him who is absent, is not Time present to us. He has his own actual Time, we have ours. We must also dismiss from our minds that unlimited notion, that all conceptive knowledge is in actual Time and Space: if it were, it would most decidedly be present or actual, which is not the case. Conceptive knowledge is merely our notion of things that have existed, or which may exist or be present to us at some other time. Actual Time and Space being the receptivities or repositories of each sentient being, they must be essential pro- iperties of each individual, and must accompany him in every situation of life in which iiis sense operates. Real Time cannot be mixed up with conceptions of other Time than that present to each sentient being. By regarding these distinctions we shall disburthen Time and Space of an immense accumulation of conceptive things, which we have been in the habit of believing existed in actual Time and 64 Space; when in truth Conceptive things, or things not actually present, are only conceptions stored in our memory in a conceptive time. Thus, by limiting existing things to those identical tilings that are present to the sense of each of us, and by isolating them from all other things that have existed, or may exist, and which we only have conceptions of, we shall arrive at a very limited notion of Time and Space. We must be extremely careful, not to mix up actual Time and Space, with conceptive 'or ideal notions of Time and Space, which do not really exist, but are merely intellectual and rational notions of the mind. I will conclude the review of the sensitive portion of the Mind, with defining Substance, and pointing out the peculiar nature of Instinct. If we analyze things of experience, or natural objects, we discover nothing but physical properties, one succeeding another: we never arrive at that something we are all in search of; that thing we denominate Substance, on which we mentally graft the various properties we discover in nature. Substance is neither more nor less than -perdur ability, or the lasting in Time, the being, the actuality, which forms no part of our conceptive or intellectual knowledge of the properties of things of this world : for that knowledge consists of judgments, whether right or wrong, which we can retain in our memories, when the substance is gone, or when the noumenon ceases to act on our sense. The Substance or perdurability demonstrates existence, and is inseparable from our actual knowledge of things. When we touch or see a thing, we have intuitive or actual knowledge of it ; and we must say, in conformity with the Laws of the Understanding, or the Laws of Nature, that it is a Sub stance we touch, and that it possesses Accidents or properties ; and it is evident, that it perdures or lasts in Time, whilst our senses continue to be affected. The great desire to ascertain the nature of Substance, will be gratified, when the abstruse points of Kantosian philosophy are 65 comprehended. Substance is the result of the innate constitution of the human mind, and is exemplified in the Category or innate Law, Substance and Accident. It cannot be beyond' the limits of the mind, for then it would be out of actual Time and Space, consequently, not knowable ; but on the contrary, we handle substance, whenever we touch existing things. I do not mean by the word handle, 'more than a Sensible operation, within the confines of the mind. The handling begets the consciousness, that, our sense of feeling has received sensa tions which are present, that is, within the Receptivities, Time and Space, which will perdure, as long as the noumenon, or external cause, operates. It must be evident, that we could not make use of the word handle, or any other implying an action, without expressing a judgment; which I have*repeatedly said is synonymous with knowledge, and is within the limits of the mind : nothing beyond these limits can we know or analyze ; therefore, the handling has nothing to do with the thing in itself, independent of the mind, for that is beyond our knowing faculty : we really know when we are handling a thing, and we inevitably judge concerning it, whether right or wrong. Substance is not a property independent of the mind, on the contrary, it is the produce of, or a result within the mind ; for sensations are received by the faculty Sense, before substance is knowable; it is the production of, or it is constituted by, the Category Substance and Accident, which is called into activity by the sensation received, and.it perdures while the noumenon continues to operate on sense. With regard to instinct, judging of the faculties of the minds of brutes, of the feathered tribe, of fishes, and of other living things, by their various habits of life, we cannot avoid concluding that they possess a most operative instinct, that directs their ways in accordance with the pre-ordained older of physical nature. We must observe, that although Instinct is extremely acute, the brute has no power to originate by free Will new chains of events ; the young pursue by instinct the same course their species did ages before them, they require no tuition, their 66 physical wants and desires impel them conjointly with their Natural Instinct to provide for their necessities; in this pursuit they very frequently fail, and yield up their life and return to earth, which they enrich by their decomposition, or become food for other living things, which their earthy nature nourishes and sustains. That they possess the Faculties of Sense and Understanding we cannot doubt ; an attentive observer must admire- their acute immediate judgments and their retentive memories ; but we dis cover no indication of conclusions of Reason as depicted in p. 29. Experience has not taught them more convenient modes of proceeding, because they possess not the faculty of reasoning, therefore they cannot form conclusions of reason ; which faculty no animal life (save man) possesses; we know of no species of the brute creation whose acute sense has taught it to derive comfort and a prolongation of life from fire, or from the exercise of any original art; because conclusions are previously requisite. The immediate judgments of the understanding which brutes possess in a great degree, are quite of another description. For example : having felt the good and evil effects of fire, they bear their know ledge in their memories, and act as their physical nature (instinct) prompts them; they either bask before it if cold, or avoid it if too hot; still, though fire is so easily kindled, (for every savage people have discovered some way or other of obtaining it,) brutes possess no faculty of concluding, that, if they were to do one act, another very desirable one would result, consequently have never discovered it. They live wholly dependent on phy sical circumstances, which many readers may term accident or chance, but which is the pre-ordained order of nature. Instinct impels them to a sort of foresight, to a necessary provision for the wants and desires of their nature; it drives beasts and birds to seek for asylums, or to make them; to bur row, or to build nests ; indeed, to take measures to provide for the imperative calls of nature ; but in these transactions no ori ginality, no freedom of will is observable : it is obvious that they are not endued with the power of reasoning. The Almighty has 67 created the various descriptions of living things that are nourished by the proceeds of the earth with physical powers adapted to their several stations in the vast and orderly work of nature, and physical laws to govern and propel the mass in its pre-ordained course. Each species is endued with physical wants and desires, which lead to an instinctive course of proceeding in this world that does not vary, excepting man, who is endned with Freedom of Will, not to counteract the laws that govern physical actions, but to originate new courses or chains of events, that he previously adjusts or plans by means of his faculty of reason ; which will be shown, as the reader advances in this work, to be in another, an immortal state. The powerful impulse of instinct in beasjs and birds, &c, tends to the preservation of life, and to the reproduction of their species by extreme care for the protection of their young; and when this instinctive care ceases to be requisite for their protec tion, feelings of affection for their offspring (which are, in fact, moral feelings,) are not observable. Hope and fear, reward and punishment, operate on the brute creation mechanically and blindly, agreeably to the laws of cause and effect, action and re action, &c. Man, from various motives which Reason, the basis of the freedom of mind points out, constrains animals by physical means, that is, by discipline, which includes rewards and punishments, hope and fear, to be obedient and subservient to him ; and he teaches them certain modes of action either for his convenience, caprice, or pleasure : but we never observe that one race of animals is made subservient to another, either for its profit or pleasure, except as instinct directs, because they can form no conclusions of probable consequences. If I were to contrast with animal instinct, the very astonishing power accruing to the phy sical operations of man, by means of the peculiar impetus of his Reason, which suggests ways and means to overcome great physical obstacles ; figuratively, to conquer nature : I should shew, that the strength of the Lion, the cunning of the Fox, and 68 the power and sagacity of the Elephant, avail them little, when at open war with Man; and, that their safety depends on avoiding his habitations, and in seeking shelter in remote and inaccessible wilds. and forests. It is not to be expected that a brief recital can be sufficient to impress on the reader the true nature of Kant's Philosophy of Mind, yet I trust the germ of the true spirit of philosophical inquiry may be excited. I feel confident that the reader will at least grant me the leading position. That all our knowledge is within the mind. It will follow, that all we actually know is within the Mind ; consequently, Time and Space, Substance and Accidents, and .every physical thing we actually know, must be within the Mind; otherwise they would be as impenetrable to our Understanding as the Noumenon, which most certainly is a mystery. Having gone through this review in a very limited compass, more for the purpose of consistency than with a prospect of suc cessfully impressing on the reader the true spirit of the abstruse points here discussed : I will now release him from the task of studying it, on condition, that if a gleam of light dart across his mind while pursuing the more obvious matter of this work, he peruse again and again the foregoing pages. I will likewise propose a mode of proceeding that will obviate the necessity of the reader's accompanying me the whole length of my conclusions, or in acquiescing in all I have advanced, till conviction absolutely compels his assent. First, I request that he will grant me, on the high authority of Immannel Kant, — That all he actually knows is produced by the powers of his mind, and is in his mind. If he cavil, I shall request he will state where else he could deposit the things of his experience, which are not distin guishable from his actual knowledge of them. If they were contained in receptivities or repositories beyond the limits of his mind, or beyond the reach of his mental powers, they could not be things of his experience. I shall also require him to satisfy himself) what portion of the things he knows, is the result of his active mind, consequently within his mind ; and what portion is m really the things in themselves, which must be distinct from his fallible judgments. If, after many erroneous judgments whidi did not make him acquainted with the true nature of the thing under inspection, he should believe that he has obtained by further mental inquiry apodictical certainty, (a belief often problematical,) he cannot even then truly say that the judgment he has formed is the thing out of the mind; he should study the nature of the Judging Powers, under Position H. If the reader grant me the position I claim, I will allow him in return to suppose, in compliance with received opinions, that the very same allotment of properties or qualities that his judging faculty has determined to be the things of experience, are the things in themselves independent of the Mind: jnoreoxer, I will make him a much greater concession, he shall have the privilege of changing the properties or nature oi the things he believes to be independent of the mind, as often as his judgments or opinions change ; that is, whenever his knowledge alters or becomes more correct. He may then say to himself I was wrong': what I believed to be the thing in itself yesterday is not so to-day, for I have altered my opinion: what it will be to-morrow I cannot tell, — I cannot be certain that I have arrived at a final judgment. ON THE MORAL NATURE OF MAN, OR, THE RATIONAL SOUL. In treating more immediately of the Immortal Soul of Man, I shall be led to the pleasing development of that divine emana tion of the Deity, Human Reason ; a knowledge of which will, I trust, tend towards ameliorating human nature, make apparent our moral duties, and open to our mental view the sub lime expanse of futurity. I shall attempt to explain the mode in which Reason and 70 physical matter operate conjointly within Triune Man or Human Nature ; which comprehends the active operation of Mortality (or physical nature), in mystical connection with our Spiritual Soul or Immortality; and unfold the great and extraordinary power derived from the action of the two in necessary connection ; by which, man is constituted an Accountable Being. Human Nature only perdures or lasts in time, until it is dissolved by death ; when the mortal body returns to earth, and the spiritual soul appears before the judgment seat of God, freed from its mortal incumbrance. Serious meditation will convince us, that a Human Being is the result of the animal and moral natures acting within the limits which the Almighty has pleased to assign to them ; the develope ment of which limits is the great object of this work. These natures are not only very dissimilar, but in two different states, they cannot therefore be amalgamated ,• yet human Nature is the product; which is neither the one, nor the other, bnt a distinct Nature, comprising good and evil, and Freedom of Will to determine it to action ; so that Man is a Free Agent. The mortal or carnal body is a sensible object within time, therefore within the limit of our physical nature; it is unquestion ably in mystical connection with our Spiritual Soul, which is out ¦of time, and beyond the reach of man's actual inspection; for it is immortal, therefore in the region of infinity. The Soul, the spiritual essence emanating directly from God, is gifted with his Law, — the pure Moral Law. The faculty of Reason, the dis tinguishing mark of man is within its precincts ; to which we trace the freedom of the human will, and through which, by means of the spiritual monitor Conscience, the divine Will is made known to Man. Conscience is the active principle in communication between body and soul, or between mortality and immortality ; conse quently, between God and Man ; through the medium of which, we search into the recesses of the soul and become acquainted with pure or divine truths ,• on which we ground our moral and religious sentiments, that direct in part our proceedings in this sinful world. 71 Conscience is no property of man's physical nature, it is the essentially holy or spiritual monitor ; the " Holy Spirit," or divine Influence acting within human nature, through the medium of the soul of man ; within the limits and under the control of the laws which the Almighty has ordained to direct Human Beings,. Its active influence is a manifestation of God's holy spirit operating within us, more particularly when we resort to it for council ; for moral, motives to guide our ways ; and to its authority we must bow to obtain contentment here. The Christian dispensation is grounded on a settled conviction of this mystical connexion between God and Man, which is taught throughout the Gospel. St. Paul says, " God hath revealed them to us by his Spirit ; for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea the deep," (or metaphysical) "things of God." (I Cor. ii. 10.) And again, addressing a whole people ; — " What ? Know ye not that your body" (human Nature) "is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own ? " (1 Cor. vi. 19.) These truths must be "spiritually discerned," by devout meditation into the reasoning soul ; for, "ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you." The sensualist, the profligate, and the covetous, are seldom under the influence of the pure Christian Spirit; they may conform to established prac tices, but their minds are darkened by avarice, vanity, and the deceitful pleasures of this world ; which prevent their discovering that happiness and virtue are closely allied. Man is limited in his physical pursuits to the boundaries of actual time, and actual space, (see page 51) ; the Spiritual orideal knowledge derived from the soul is not of this world, it is meta- pbysical ; it serves as a beacon to guide our earthly ways in con junction with the imperative demands of our physical nature, and is only operative in proportion as it is cultivated or drawn, forth by conclusions of Reason grounded on natural appearances, or the phenomena of nature. Thus pure or metaphysical knowledge is only attainable through the impure and dark medium of mortality; consequently, we need not wonder that its operation on worldly 72 transactions is so slow ; for until the actions as well as the opinions Of mankind, are regulated by its maxims and theorems, (which cannot be expected in this world, although we must allow a conti nued approach towards virtue;) it cannot have fully enlightened our darkness. Hitherto, judging from the records of the past, man has con tinued so blinded by superstition and the depravity of his nature, that the pure or divine Spirit within his soul, has not been brought to act on mortality so effectually as the Christian doctrines and ordinancies might have led us to expect; for we have yet to lament the unreasonable sacrifice of the widow on the funeral pile of her departed husband, and other barbarous customs and monstrous excesses among the unenlightened, which are permitted, nay, even commanded as duties, from mistaken views of God's providence ; without any impure motives in the minds of the per petrators, who are so blinded by superstition, as to entertain the horrid belief that they are doing their duty, and serving a just and holy God. In Christian countries, excesses almost as criminal are com mitted under the sanction of law. When the penalty of death is awarded for offences against property ; the merciful doctrine of Christ is abandoned and retributive Justice forgotten ; worldly possessions are estimated so highly, that the life of one individual is considered a requisite atonement in this world, for depriving another of his purse or his moveables ; to say the least of it, human life is sacrificed under the pretext of an example to deter others from crime. Is this system of jurisprudence founded on justice, barbarism, or the imperfection of human laws? If each member of society would measure his own virtue by his pure ideas of honesty and of disinterestedness, and keep in view the imperative wants and sensual desires of his nature ; few Legisla tors would be found to enact such inhuman laws and proclaim them to be founded on Justice. We need only reflect on the emblem of Justice, (the scales, or balance) to be assured that such retribution exceeds all due bounds, and in a moral and religious view is criminal. The Christian community that coun- 73 tenances the perpetration of these excesses, ought to be acquainted with The Merciful Doctrine of Christ 5 still we must admit, that it acts free from impure, motives, and under the impression that it is performing a duty acceptable to God and Man. On investigating the essence of pure Justice, we shall discover, that it is a sentiment of the soul, grounded on the idea of Disinterestedness ; it possesses no physical property, there fore is not within the limit of time ,- it is a pure Idea of Reason, a portion of the divine Law within our moral nature, which St. Paul denominates " Spiritual;" for he says, " We know that the Law is Spiritual, but I" (the physical man,) " am carnal," (Rom. vii. 14.) Justice does not comprise any portion of a physical act or a physical thing, it rests in the pure motive within the region of the soul that prompts the Will to direct human actions ; Moral Maxims originate in the pure idea oi Justice ; and in practice, become intermixed with the impurities of human nature, and are biassed by carnal desires ; even when well understood. The school of theology has not hitherto implanted in the human mind, a comprehensive notion of Justice ; consequently many good and great men act in ignorance of its pure principles. Justice demands a fair equivalent for transgressions, nothing more ; it likewise comprehends the fulfilment of honest contracts, or agreements between man and man. In general the interested parties, if free, are the best able to adjust their contracts ; and it is the duty of the public law or coercive power in the com munity, to compel the performance, adjudge a compensation, or inflict an adequate punishment for a breach of contract ; unless untoward events, have intervened, which will operate on the judgment of the law in extenuation. It may be asked, why is the divine Spirit within us so inoperative ? Why does it not direct us in the right way ? because, ye search not inwardly for a pure disinterested motive, but act as expediency directs ; a most fallacious guide unless closely allied with Justice. Ye are besides, so engaged with the vanities of the world, that ye have little desire to study the 74 "Law of God" within the mind; and the Spirit does not operate efficaciously until ye are desirous of becoming morally good. Such is your doom. It might likewise be asked, why was man created capable of Sin r because it pleased the Almighty to make him a Free Agent. God bestowed upon him the knowledge' of good and evil, and the power to act as his will directs, -under the control of the laws that govern physical objects; moreover, he gifted him with a Spiritual Monitor, Conscience, to shew him the path of virtue and guide him through the labyrinth; the disposition of mind to pursue the better course, makes him the more acceptable in the estimation of a holy God. If man were not a Free Agent, if he were acted upon, or moved as a machine, the idea of responsibility would be. absurd, and ac countability unjust. Another question' may as justly be asked. — Why then is man so immoral ? because he is a slave to worldly possessions,' and to the lusts of the flesh. To be morally good he must be " born again." Contemplating human beings in communion with their hea venly Father when virtue directs their steps, (for then their minds must be intent on the pure law within;) Iam of opinion, that thi£. communion must be considered as held through the mediuni of the Spirit we denominate Conscience, which I have portrayed ^as the spiritual influence acting mystically between our two natures, in other words, the communion between God and Man. I apprehend in a future, life, it is this active spirit that will retain consciousness of earthly existence, and will be punished or re warded for the deeds of the flesh ; for if human B#ings be endued with- a Moral Spirit or inward Monitor to direct their steps in the right way, which we cannot doubt ; a neglect^ or abandonment of such duty, should in justice draw on this Spiritual Monitor merited sufferings in another world ; and the performance of its duties in directing the thoughts and actions to a'.course approach ing virtue, should entitle it to a proportionate degree of happiness when released from its earthly trammels ; probably this " Spirit" Within human nature which may be considered the activity of the soul) becomes (when released by death,) indentified with the 75 soul ; yet burdened with responsibility for the sins committed in the flesh. To keep the human mind free from gross absurdities, contem plations on futurity or "the hidden things of God," should be kept within the confines of Reason ; the history of mankind evinces the great necessity of investigating deeply that faculty of the human mind ; otherwise, we may indulge in visionary specula tions, until we are absorbed in superstitious if not criminal excesses under a mistaken impression of Spiritual fervour ; which may render us unjust, cruel, and intolerant ; thus unfit us for the active duties of humanity by extravagant excesses, if not mental derangement. A thorough knowledge of our reasoning powers will tend to make us acquainted with the limits of our spiritual or ideal acquirements ; and not allow us to wanderntoo far into the region of infinity. Reason when highly cultivated compels us to admit the existence of a pure or holy Spirit within the confines of the soul, which we mentally discern when meditating on the pure moral or spiritual law within human nature; (St. Paul's "Law of God,") which is distinct from our animal desires 5 in fact, operating to control and to. direct them in the paths of honour and duty. Reason does not allow us to determine the particular manner in which we shall partake of everlasting life ; it curbs visionary inquiries into futurity, and teaches us^o ac* so worthily that we may merit eternal bliss. It is not only, presumptuous but profane, and beyond the just powers of, our knowing faculty to attempt to ascertain the hidden ways of God, which are inscruta ble ; .the Christian doctrines do not encourage such inquiries ; this knowledge is not to be obtained during our earthly abode. St. Paul says in answer to the questions, How are the dead raised up ? with what body do they come ? " God giveth it a body as it hath pleased him ; there is a natural body and there is a Spiritual body." (he does not particularly define either,) "This I say, brethren, flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God. Behold, I show you a mystery." (1 Cor. xv. 35, 38, 44, 50, 51.) Meaning no doubt that our connection with God and his kingdom was mystical, therefore beyond the limits of human knowledge) and not to be fully laid open on this side the grave. 76 Yet such is the unbounded curiosity of man, that if he were acquainted with, or could be made sensible of a power within the verge of human nature, that could unfold the mysteries of futurity, he would approach it without delay ; and would be tempted' to inquire whether the soul, which emanates from the Deity and ascends to God's presence at the dissolution of human nature, is rewarded or punished ? or whether Conscience, the influential Spirit between Body and Soul is judged ? and in what, the dis tinction between them consists ? further, he would be extremely desirous of ascertaining in what particular manner it has pleased the Almighty to order and adjust his Spiritual Kingdom ? we know by means of sound conclusions of Reason, that the divine Spirit pervades that portion of physical nature we are acquainted with, and directs its scientific organization ; and there can be no doubt that the portion not yet investigated or not susceptible of investigation by the limited powers of man, is under the operative influence of the same spirit. Reason as before observed, forbids our attempts to search into the mystical ordination of God's kingdom. The attempt is pre sumptuous, and to credit mortal report on such subjects, however worked up by the imagination, would be absurd. We can only obtain Ideal or Spiritual Knowledge that is within the bounds of Reason ; beyond those limits all is visionary speculation, all mys tical ! when such speculations are carried to an unreasonable and immoral excess, absurdity and criminality are engendered, which are the forerunners of superstition, the directing Genius of fanati cism and religious tyranny. Wemust be satisfied with the assurance, that " what we know not now, we shall know hereafter." That Human Nature is in active connection through the spiritual soul with the Almighty Creator, none can doubt, who have mentally heard the voice of Conscience, or who have felt its reproof, and have reflected on the spiritual nature of this unseen monitor ; much less those who have been sensible of its mental inflictions, and have been subdued by remorse. This truth, is the essential ground work of the Doctrine of Christ, who said to the unbelieving Pharisees, " The Kingdom of God 77 cometh not with observation, behold, the Kingdom of God is within you." (Luke xvii. 20 and 21 .) meaning, I apprehend, within human nature. The divine active influence or "Holy Spirit" operating between God and Man within the confines of Reason, we denominate Con science. The Trinity in Man is derived from this mystical connection, and the three persons or essential manifestations of one God, are conceivable according to the following arrangement : — 1. The Divine Being or Omnipotent Creator, — " God the Father." 2. The Divinity operating on human nature, (the Immortal Soul) authorizes us to address God as our Father, therefore Man is figuratively " God the Son," for we are the children of God. 3. The Divine Spiritual influence between rfSod and Man — Conssience ; proceeding from the Father to the Son, yet acting within the limited faculties and' powers conferred on Human Nature " God the Holy Ghost." Thus is the Trinity in Unity made evident in human nature. I rest this doctrine on the teaching of Jesus Christ and his Apostles. St. Paul says, " There is a natural body" (of the Nature of Earth), " and a spiritual body" (of the Nature of God), (lCor. xv. 44.) which declaration is confirmed in (Genesis ii. 7-) " The Lord formed Man (t/ie Mortality) of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life," (the immortality,) in other words infused into him the Divine Spirit, "and man became a living Soul," or human being possessing two natures ; (St. Paul's two bodies,) the mortal body and the spiritual body, or immortal soul. St. Paul likewise says, "We know that if our earthly house" (the mortal body) "of this tabernacle" (human nature) " were dissolved," (by death,) "we" (the soul) "have a building of God, a house not made with hands, eternal in the heavens." (2 Cor. v. 1.) Denoting that we have two houses or two natures, body and soul, one earthly and the other heavenly ; the one will return to earth, the other will partake of everlasting life in the world to come. 78 Other portions of Scripture uphold the doctrine of the Trinity in Man, some of which are here referred to. (Matt. vi. 1.) (Matt. x. 20.) (Mark xiii. 11.) (Luke xi. 9, 13.) (John iii. 3, 6.) (Acts xvii. 28.) (lCor. vi. 19.) (1 John iii. 1, 2.) (1 John iv. 12, 13.)— Clearly to understand the nature of the Divine Spirit within us, (meaning within that portion of Human Nature deno minated the Soul;) which Christ and his Apostles continually dwelt upon in their instructions to mankind ; and which is the corner stone of the Christian Religion : we must endea vour by means of "inward research" to comprehend the Moral Law within us, which in accordance with St. Paul, I have so repeatedly termed the " Law of God." (Rom. vii. 21 to 25.) This pure Law, or " Spirit of God within us," is the constituent principle of the Spiritual Soul of Man; it is not demonstrable to the senses, but may become apparent to our reason, if sought for by devout meditation ; and unless we investigate deeply the recesses of the soul in search of this divine law, we cannot obtain the knowledge of it, or become conscious of its possession. In truth, we do not possess it practically, until by communion with the Almighty through the medium of Conscience, or the divine influence in activity between mortality and immortality, we are impressed with, or blessed with a firm belief, that the " Spirit of God" or the "Holy Ghost" has descended on our human nature, or is in activity within us ; which will become evident by the purity of our motives, and the morality -of our actions. This the Apostles denominate the love of our Father who is in heaven to us his children. And the recommendation, — Seek ye first the Kingdom of God and his righteousness, for these are the great things ; and the small things, and the things relating to this life shall be added unto you; — deserves our most serious consideration. While contemplating Human Nature we cannot view the soul and body as unconnected ; the body partakes of the nature of earth, and is propelled by physical laws, the soul partakes of a spiritual nature— of the Deity, and is endued with his Law, and we cannot but be fully sensible of the power of Conscience on the 79 human frame, which in despite of our resolves to the contrary, inflicts on us real punishment, frequently past endurance, for offences against the Moral or Spiritual Law. The Divine Spirit (familiarly termed Conscience) which per vades man, and which is enthroned within the soul, is the "Holy Ghost" or the holy spirit which St. Paul alludes to when address ing the Corinthians, " Know ye not that ye are the Temple of God, and that the spirit of God dwelleth in you." (1 Cor. iii. 16.) This " Holy Spirit" is an essential quality of the Trinity in Man, it is the spiritual medium through which our prayers ascend to our Heavenly Father. Christ felt its whole force when he impressed on man those kind, charitable, and benevolent moral sentiments which are incul cated throughout his teaching. For example, «vhen he charged the people to follow his precepts, " that ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven." (Matt. v. 45.) " And when thou prayest, enter into thy closet and pray to thy Father in secret, use no vain repetitions, for your Father knoweth what things ye have need of before ye ask." (Matt. vi. 6, 7, 8.) Indeed, the entire spirit of the Gospel directs the mind to the soothing doctrine of Communion with God the Father, through the medium of the Divine Spirit — Conscience ; and necessarily to the Doctrine of the Trinity in Man, which is comprised in the previous doctrine. The Divinity in heaven, and the Divinity within Human Nature, commune through the medium of Conscience, or the "Holy Spirit." Thus the Divine Omnipotent Spirit " God the Father." The Divine Spiritual Soul of Man, (the essential of humanity,) "God the Son." And the Divine spiritual influence between mortality and immortality — (Conscience,) "God the Holy Ghost," constitute the Trinity in Unity. Three persons, or the three modes of operation of the One God. For the Divine or supreme spirit in Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, is one and the same spirit, and centres in the Supreme intelligence, in the Omni potent Creator, the only God ! Supremacy is indivisible, yet the influence of the Supreme Being, in other words, the Spirit of God, pervades all bis works. 80 It is impossible to attune Human Nature in strict accordance with the moral law or Divinity within us ; it is not pure like our immortal Soul or Moral Nature, therefore it is not synonymous with that nature ; nor is it free from moral influence, and solely at the command of the Law of Sin, (the lust of the flesh, or the desires of our Animal Nature ;) consequently, it is not that nature. It is a distinct nature, the product of the two, and is occasionally under the influence of either to excess, and much wisdom is requi site to direct Human Nature generally iu a moral and judicious course. Even St. Paul found this determination of the will very trying ,• he says, " I see another Law in my members warring against the law of the mind" (the Moral Law,) "and bringing me into captivity to the Law of Sin which is in my members." (Rom. vii. 23.) St. Paul no doubt contemplated his Human Nature as a distinct nature, not necessarily under the control either of the Animal or the Moral Nature, but subject to the dominion of his will (the Free Agency in Man) which being biassed by good and evil, the conflicting principles in human nature, a steady course of virtue is almost impossible ; for these two prin ciples being ever at variance, our resolves and actions are propelled as either the one or the other predominates ; and the most praise worthy exertions cannot always silence the subtle insinuations of immorality, which must not be mistaken for sensuality ; the latter we can never be free from, for we are Sentient Beings ; yet the impulse may be kept within due bounds. Vicious Acts are of a different stamp, they are grounded on a predisposition contrary to the just decisions of the Moral Law within us, or sound moral judgments ; these should be controlled by our will or the moral law is inoperative. Sensual pleasures when under the guidance of Reason are meritorious, they constitute our happiness ; when they pass that boundary, they approach by degrees to profligacy ; when they are accompanied by deceit and breach of contract, expressed or im plied, they are criminal ; and degrade our higher nature in our own estimation. Man is a rational as well as a sensual being, and cannot at his 81 pleasure divest himself of the use of Reason ; he may cajole his reason with casuistical notions, aided by strong worldly desires until he commits crime ; yet reason has not abandoned him. In this Sinful state, Conscience, "the Holy Spirit within him," first whispers tthat he is straying beyond the path of virtue,— next admonishes him ; and, if disregarded, inflicts mental punishment, which aided by the dictates of the Moral Law, may lead to repen tance, and to a firm resolve to pursue a virtuous course in future ; in the hope, through a strict performance of moral and religious duties, to lighten future punishment, and through God's Mercy obtain pardon and a blissful eternity. It must be obvious that a thorough knowledge of our reasoning powers which is the basis of true Religion, must be most condu cive to contentment in this life of trial, and to out- hope of eternal happiness hereafter. Uncertainty on moral and religious truths of intense interest to rational man, leads to misery, superstition, and a dread of offending unwillingly, a Benign and Merciful Creator ; whilst a moral conviction of our necessary duties to God and Man, induces us to pursue the path of virtue for our own sakes, and leaves no sting ! no suspicion ! no doubt ! no dread as to the final result!! Events are frequently beyond our control and should concern us much less than they do : to be Mentally satisfied with each day's conduct, is the greatest blessing we can enjoy ; it is the result of the powerful working of our moral nature, and produces in our minds the Holy feeling of Contentment. Man is the only portion of physical nature we are acquainted with, that is endued with, or in mystical connection with a Moral Nature or reasoning soul, (noumenon), which enables him to turn his thoughts inwardly, and by diving into that Soul or seat of Reason, to draw forth new ideas and rational conclusions, which are the unseen motives to new and original physical events ; these conclusions are not under the control of the laws of physics, the attempt to realize them by plans and operations within timeis under their power. He then discovers the soundness or fallacy of his conclusions, their practicability for the purposes contemplated,: 82 and the impossibility of opposing the laws that invariably govern physical operations ; which have their root in the human mmd. Possessing an immortal soul (noumenon) the immaterial basis of our moral nature, distinct from the animal body, yet in mystical connection with it ; it must necessarily be in another or separate state, for immortality is incompatible with our physical nature, it cannot amalgamate with or form part of that perishable existence which terminates in the grave : therefore the immortal soul is not within the limit of time ; for all within that limit is mortal, and must have a beginning and an end, and be divisible into parts or portions of time, of which immortality is not suscep tible. When the mystical connection between Body and Soul is dissolved, or when it terminates in death, a change takes place, the Human Being is no more ; his mortal body returns to earth, and his immortal soul appears in the presence of the Almighty, to receive his judgment. The soul is the link that connects us with our Heavenly Father, and is the depository of the pure moral law, the divinity within us ; and of the infinite ideas of pure reason, which enable us to form conclusions, even of the attributes of the Godhead. Reason has instructed communities that have had no connection with each other, even the unenlightened, to conclude that there is a Spirit of immortality (noumenon) in mystical connection with mortality, and that there is a world to come ; in which that immortality will be rewarded or punished as its greater or lesser influence on mortality may have merited at the final judgment. The moral certainty that man is free either to do good or to do evil in this world, induces us to conclude that his immortal soul will be rewarded or punished as it may deserve in another ; for until his mortal career be terminated, his soul, or the accountable spirit is not freed from its connection with mor tality, not in a state to appear at the judgment seat of God, to answer for the deeds of human nature, and to receive its doom. Reason is the noblest attribute of man, it is wholly free from any physical property, and is not within the limits of time and 83 space, which are the receptacles of physical things'; it is the Faculty that enables him " to see (mentally) the invisible things of God, from the creation of the world:" it has been accuratelyinves- tigated and defined by Immanuel Kant, and its laws and modes of action are developed in Section II, page 28. This faculty of the human mind is divisible into two distinct branches, which are denominated Practical and Speculative Reason. To elucidate these terms, I will refer to the Principle in the Mind of the systematic progression on which the multiplication table is founded) which is one of the practical laws of the art or science of arithmetic ; it is a universal and an indisputable practi cal law, consequently susceptible of no change in its' principle. Speculative questions within the range of the science are worked by it, that is, results are produced in the mind by> means of this practical law, iu conjunction with the other laws of the science of arithmetic, discoverable in the human mind ; for sciences are grounded on laws in the mmd, the attainment of which is one great object of research into the rational soul. Speculative con clusions within the range of the science, are very different, and distinct from the practical laws or universal tables on, which the science of arithmetic is grounded : the practical laws are the fun damentals and constitute the science, the speculative rules- or con clusions urge us on to new suggestions and inquiries, and lead to new results, and are likewise regulative. Practical Reason is the divine portion of our moral nature, an emanation direct from God, the pure essence of immortality ! in fact, the constituent principle of our immortal soul. It acts solely within the confines of the pure science of metaphysics, (infinity), therefore it is not applicable to any knowledge or thing that is bounded by time; it is the basis of the spiritual doctrine of the Apostles. Its mode of action is purely ideal or spiritual, and the. six pure ideas which are illustrated in page 32, are the sublime activities of the faculty of reason. Conclusions of practical reason, or pure metaphysical or spiritual conclusions, are absolutely universal and necessary ; that is irrefutable or incontrovertible; they generate metaphysical 84 knowledge on the basis of the six pure ideas of reason, which is perceptible in all those conclusions that are formed in the mind, without the immediate aid of actual knowledge ; these conclusions are not derived from experience, but are the pure portion of the mind. They are ideas derived from the rational soul, the basis of ideal or spiritual knowledge. The objects of these ideas being spiritual or metaphysical, they are entirely free from the necessary ingredients of physical things, matter and form; which exist in time and space ; they are not within the limited repositories or recepti vities of physics, (Time and Space), but within the region of Infinity, and under the laws of reason, which exclude absurdity and immorality, and differ as widely from the laws of physics as mortality does from immortality. The conclusion, "I know that my Redeemer liveth," isspiritual or metaphysical knowledge, derived from the reasoning sonl, and incontrovertible ; it contemplates the Godhead of Christ, or the divinity which shone on the human race through his mortality: for the divinity in heaven, is God the Creator, Preserver, and Redeemer. We are precluded by this branch of the faculty of reason from admitting speculative conclusions within its range, therefore our knowledge of God's kingdom must be very limited. Practical Reason not being susceptible of any conclusions connected with physical objects, must be. viewed only as the spritual or metaphysical source from which the moral conduct of man proceeds ; in truth, practical reason centres in that spiritual emanation — the immortal, soul, which St. Paul contemplated when he emphatically said, " In him we live, and move, and have our being;" and which St. John likewise contemplated when he declared that " God is in us, and we in him." There can be no question but that the spiritual doctrine of pure Christianity, the result of— infinite reason,— proceeds from the influence or mystical association of our immortal soul the throne of conscience with our mortal body ; which comprehends the mysterious incarnation or connection between the divine or holy spirit, and carnal flesh. 85 All ideas, that is, all spiritual conclusions which are not suscep tible of division, or which do not comprise co-existing parts, and cannot be terminated in thought by any period of time, but on the contrary, are absolute or infinite, must be classed under the head of metaphysics. The following metaphysical conclusions of practical reason are traced to the mind, and are cited as examples. Immor tality, eternity, infinite justice, mercy, and truth ; pure liberty and equality, imprescriptible and unalienable rights, the pure moral law within us, the innate laws or organs of the human mind, the noumenon or cause of sensation that operates on sense previously to our forming immediate judgments ; the soul of man, the pure moral kingdom, or the kingdom of God ! Speculative Reason, the other branch of the faculty is regu lative, being that division of reason that is applictlble to physical or experimental knowledge ; it is grounded on the six rules illustrated in page 35, and acts within the range of the science of physics ; which comprehends all our knowledge of things that are susceptible of being within time and space, consequently, that are grounded on sensible effects. Speculative Reason operates by conclusions that are free from time and space, yet is grounded on conceptive knowledge, or on things actually known. Con cluding in the strict sense of the word, is the ideal result derived from the reasoning faculty, and grounded on premises real or pre sumed; concluding is no physical act in itself; that is, it is not within the limits of our sensitive faculty ; when operations take place within time, at the suggestion of reason,.either by speech, thought, plan, writing, or by actual experiment, physical opera tions commence, grounded on speculative conclusions. Speculative Reason, which may with propriety be termed Theoretical, anticipates desirable events; it is strictly limited to sensible objects, yet its conclusions are ideal ; it suggests conti nual experiments in physical matters, urges us to push our inquiries into the nature of the objects of experience by mental examination, and prompts us to arrange and regulate our acquired knowledge by classification, &c. It likewise induces us to seek for means and objects by which we may supply every want and 86 desire of our animal nature, including the gratification of oar passions; which last should be subjected to the dictates of prac tical reason, our great moral guide. Man is the only portion of the physical creation that is endued with that freedom oi soul which displays itself in his actions and in his stupendous works; for by deep research into his reasoning soul, he is ever determining his will so to direct his physical powers, that he may originate new arts or new chains of events in this world, to advance and practically to accomplish the insatiable desires of his nature ; which ultimately lead to, and mainly contribute to the introduction and perfection of arts and sciences, and likewise to the establishment of religion, and of laws for the government of his moral conduct, and of his phy sical actions. By inward research he discovers hypotheses, and ultimately fundamental laws or principles within his rational nature, on which he first establishes useful arts, that by reflection and deep study are at a future period of time reduced to scientific order. The instant we attempt to realize our speculations (the result of our freedom of will,) by carrying our conclusions on physical properties into effect ; freedom ceases, and physical operations commence, grounded on a combination of our rational conclusions and experimental knowledge j physical means are then sought for to accomplish the desired end, which comprise all the physical properties deemed requisite to attain the object of our will, in other words, of our free agency ; these physical properties are necessarily under the control of the laws of the science of phy sics, cause and effect, action and re-action, &c, to the exclusion of any freedom or opposition to the pre-ordained progress of those laws, which admit of no counteraction ; a natural effect is only to be met or counteracted by another natural effect, arising from another cause, and no physical matter, excepting man, possesses a reasoning soul and freedom of will, (ideas derived from his reason) which enable him to suggest new and original physical acts, within the range of the laws of physics, and to direct their appli cation so as to overcome physical obstacles that impede his desires. 87 This procedure is manifested in every transaction of life, more particularly in that of conveyance, whether by sea or land; of persons, of ponderous goods, or of information from one rational being to another when residing in distant countries. This has tended to unite the inhabitants of the earth in the bonds of intercourse. Speculative Reason (conclusions on physical properties,) must be carefully watched, and not be suffered to range beyond its legitimate bounds, time andspace"; it should not be suffered to wander into the unknown region of metaphysics, (infinity,) which is the province of practical reason, and which admits of no idea, except in a figurative sense, that embraces physical properties, nor any notion that contemplates sensible perception, even in thought ; for all such appertain to this world, 8nd are within the bounds of speculative reason, time and space. When speculative reason wanders into the field of metaphysics, that is, beyond the confines of sense, the most dangerous errors are the consequence ; we absurdly transfer in thought, sensible ideas out of the medium of sense (time and space) into that of infinity, which is com pletely beyond our actual knowledge, and not susceptible of earthly or physical things ; therefore none but the uninformed or the enthusiast- would indulge in this transfer ; did men of sound sense allow this extension of earthly conceptions, notions as fabulous as the heathen mythology, or tales nearly as absurd, the result of ignorance of the science of metaphysics, might obtain credit to the great detriment of the civilized world, and to the obstruction of the pure spiritual belief of Christians ; which is too often associated with material notions and figurative ideas. Speculative Reason is a component part of the .'knowing faculty, or of the intellect, which is made up of sense, under standing, and speculative reason ; these powers of the mind are ever in conjoint and systematic operation when conclusions of any description within the bounds of physics occur ; which differ from immediate judgments of the understanding, as the following example will shew :— When we see the grass and say it is green, 88 the understanding simply judges, or produces an intelligible object, or result in the mind, grounded on intuition or sensations received, no further judgment is anticipated : but were we to inquire, If the grass be too damp to walk upon ? meaning, would walking upon it -injure our health, much more is involved : cause and effect are contemplated, and a rational conclusion is required, which must be verified by the powers of the intellect, and by actual inspection. To illustrate and make evident the province of speculative reason, I will state various speculative conclu sions, within the limits of time, that comprehend matters of experience, and are within the Science of Physics. For example, if this plank be strong enough we may venture to cross the brook ; all animal and vegetable life requires nutri ment ; the form of the earth is spherical ; the sun is the centre of the solar system. All conclusions grounded on sensible pheno mena, mathematical demonstrations, and the six rules of specula tive reason, are likewise so many conclusions of speculative reason, and when borne out by physical experiments, are sound, intellectual knowledge. Other conclusions that can never be made manifest, or that are not yet proved by physical experiment, may either be termed rational or irrational conclusions ; for example, there are inhabitants in the moon ; and balloons one day will rival steam vessels, for the conveyance of passengers to distant countries, &c. Being very desirous that the reader should comprehend the mode in which speculative reason acts, as a component property of the knowing faculty, or of the intellect, I will further elucidate that branch of reason, which is ever in active co-operation with sense and understanding in producing intellectual knowledge, although it is no property of the material world ; for conclusions of speculative reason are simply ideas grounded on the antici pation of probable results ; while the operations of sense and understanding are confined to physical objects. Speculative conclusions only suggest probable results and promote the acquirement of intellectual knowledge, they donotform part of that knowledge which is grounded on actual experiment ; 89 they are the influence of our reasoning soul, the free result of our will, (regulated by the laws and rules of the faculty of reason), that prescribes modes and determines our physical nature to parti cular actions ; these conclusions propel the understanding to form conceptions, grounded on previous conceptions, and to verify them by physical operations. Conclusions of Reason which are Ideal cannot be physical operations within time and space, nor can they be under the con trol of the laws of physics. If that were the case, they would possess no freedom ; their suggesting and directing powers, which are their distinguishing marks, would be annihilated, and they would be confounded with conceptive knowledge, which we shall find not to be the true state of the case. The Idea or conclusion, is the produce of a rational inquiry, anticipatfhg the probable operation or result of certain physical actions or events which it suggests ; in the hope of supplying our wants, or of gratifying our desires ; the idea of reason is not the act of the mind we term thinking ; but it is that rational decision of our reason, that influence of the soul, which is forthcoming when zealously sought for through the medium of serious meditation, by the operation or act of thinking, and when attained, is the influence that operates on man, and induces him to engage in various projects, and to persevere in great and arduous undertakings ; and ulti mately to establish arts and propound sciences. The elucidation of this abstruse distinction by example, may make it more apparent.-. Rational ideas oi probable results deduced from our knowledge of certain combinations, are justly termed rational conclusions, and when proved by actual experi ment, intellectual knowledge j when the object of inquiry or question to be determined is very doubtful, we may as readily conclude wrong as right ; sound actual knowledge then becomes the test of truth. Being very desirous of clearing up this point with a friend, and of proving to him that his conclusions on physical properties were very different and distinct from his conceptive or intellectual knowledge ; which to be valid must be grounded on intuitive or 90 actual knowledge ; whereas, conclusions of reason however cor rect, are not actual or within the limit of time ; but on the contrary, are merely ideas ; being the production of the rational soul, and are in a very different medium from time ; in infinity; that is, beyond the limits of the sensible world. I asked my friend if his tortoiseshell snuff box would float on water ?. and if he would throw it into the river to ascertain the fact ? he immediately applied to his reason for conclusions on its physical properties : then answered, that he thought it would swim, for it was air-tight, and not very heavy in proportion to its bulk ; but he objected to throw it into the river for fear of losing it ; con sequently, we obtained no actual or positive knowledge on that point, and we remained satisfied with our conclusive or ideal knowledge which was grounded on science. My friend allowed that his rational conclusions though most likely true, were not conceptive or intellectual knowledge, resulting from actual expe riment or intuition, but quite of another nature ; nor could he identify his conclusions with the mere act of thinking, and he admitted, that they were rational knowledge derived from his reasoning soul, partaking of none of the properties of physics, parts that co-exist, and parts that succeed each other; which latter .are very different from age, that comprehends the past; for the parts in succession if they perdure but an instant, occupy the present time, the point between the past and the forthcoming; my friend's conclusion was simply an idea of reason, drawn into operation, by the act of thinking ; thejdea possessed no physical property. .Again, history relates that the great Columbus having obtained by close communion with, his rational soul, (that influential though indescribable basis of our moral nature), rational conclu sions or ideal knowledge of the form of the earth, and of the great probability of arriving at the East Indies by sailing a westerly course; he determined on taking measures to ascertain their truth, in the hope of participating with the Portuguese in the honour and renown of discovering a passage by sea to the east. These rational conclusions caused so irresistible an impression on his 91 reasoning mind, that he applied to several courts of Europe in the expectation of being fitted out for the discovery, but without suc cess ; after various mortifying occurrences, Ferdinand and Isabella of Spain, fitted him out with three small ships. During his voyage across the great Atlantic Ocean he experienced much opposition from his crew, who became alarmed at what they termed his teme rity ; but on the discovery of land, and human beings adorned with ornaments made of fine gold, they implored his forgiveness, and pronounced him to be a person inspired by heaven in order to accomplish a design so far beyond the ideas and conclusions of all former ages. The result of this great undertaking may be summed up in a few words ; instead of arriving at the East Indies, Columbus met with land before he had traversed half the vast intervening oceans ; for there were two oceans ro cross, divided by the new world ; which he had the honor of discovering. We will now draw inferences which may tend to make evident the point I am aiming at, and which will, I trust, convince us that speculative conclusions of reason are grounded on the free dom of the soul, and differ materially from actual knowledge, which is subjected to the laws of cause and effect, action and re-action, &c, which allow of no freedom. Conclusions of speculative reason on the contrary, are the result of that free will which determines us to action, and directs our physical nature to pursue new courses of events in this world; as the discoveries of Columbus and others have satisfactorily proved. These commanding conclusions emanate from that free source, the spiritual soul, and are never within the medium of physics, time and space ; therefore cannot be subjected to actual inspec tion ; they are purely ideal, and unless they operated on our physical powers' in the manner alluded to, those powers would remain as inert as they do in all the other phenomena of nature. There can be no question, but that the Almighty so illumines particular individuals through' their immortal souls, that they •become his especial instruments, and are the mediums through which he reveals to mankind his will or the ways of providence. The unceasing perseverance of men endued with great and pecu- 92 liarreasoniug powers adapted to some particular pursuit; though to the injury of their health, and of their worldly affairs, confirms this. doctrine, which is in unison with the spirit of the Gospel. The reasoning powers of the great Columbus could not be intimidated by the fear of death, or of failure, from pursuing their determined course. We are not justified in mixing up miracles with physical events, unless we are apodictically certain of their occurrence ; for the miraculous implies that events or occurrences within the medium of physical nature, (time and space,) have successfully opposed the irresistible laws of physics, and assumed a freedom of action directly contrary to those laws; thus, deranging the scientific order and graceful harmony observable throughout the visible works of the Creation. Were any person, even the most influential, to inform us that he had asceuded in a ship from the ocean, and sailed. in her on the clouds out of sight of land, to a distant country ; even were his relation true, we should not be justified in giving it credence, for to us it could only be a relation depending upon his testimony; now events that derange the divine order of the works of God, by opposing the laws of physics, cause and effect, action and re-action, &c, must be made sensible to us by actual observation, that is, apodictically certain ; before it can be requisite in us to believe such relations to be true, or to admit that such events have really occurred ; erroneous belief iu such relations is so far of consequence, that it weakens the sub lime idea we ought to entertain of the Omniscient Creator, and involves the mind; in doubt with regard to the divine regularity and unchangeable order produced by the laws of physical nature ; such an erroneous belief unhinges the sound conclusions of the spiritual soul, and prepares the mind for the reception of super stitious and absurd conclusions, which outrage science, reason, and common sense. Although we cannot allow, without great inconsistency, mira culous relations to be mixed up with physical actions or events, we. must yet attribute the irresistible motive that propels great and good men to persevere in a determined pursuit, to the 93 influence of the divine spirit operating on mortality through the medium of the soul, the seat of reason. Thus I infer, that " the spirit of God within us" is working powerfully on our phy sical nature, not by direct speech ! not in dreams ! but by con clusions of reason ; for we are decidedly in a progressive state of advancement towards moral perfection, and as moral science is more developed we shall form more correct judgments, and become more assured of our accountability, and of our dependance on the moral law within us. I entertain no doubt but that the new, or more emphatically, the divine or spiritual light which has expanded the soul of Immanuel Kant, will greatly tend to illumine future ages, and to eradicate that uncharitable viru lence observable in mankind, which springs from superstition, selfishness, and confined notions of the providence of God towards his creatures, The Essence of Reason, or the soul of man, comprehends ideal or moral liberty, (that is, freedom from the categories or laws that govern and coerce physical operations,) which enables us by meditation to dive into our very soul in search of moral principles ; those divine ideas which are the attributes of the Deity. We find virtue to be a strict conformity to the commands of Reason, and lament that in the physical world so many impediments occur to its general practice. Practical Reason, the legislative faculty of man, is the source from which all virtuous actions proceed, for though they, as well as vicious actions, are physical ; the moral law and the freedom of the will that spring from the soul, direct them; whereas the animal propensities lead to evil or vicious courses. Within the rational soul we seek for moral motives, to determine and direct our physical operations. If we proceed in opposition to the laws of physics, (cause and effect, action and re-action, &c.,) the most disastrous consequences ensue ; for example, were we to attempt to fly from a lofty tower, or to descend to the bottom of the sea, in search of worldly riches, without the requisite apparatus, the contrivance of man, to coun teract physical obstacles without opposing the Taws of physics, we should throw away our lives. 94 To obtain disinterested moral instruction, we must have the courage honestly to dive (by meditation,) into the spiritual or rational soul, or, the " inward man," in search of moral maxims to detect the secret bias that governs our worldly actions ; with a determination to correct immorality, and to pursue the path of moral duty. For man possesses the power of establishing laws and maxims for his own government, a legislative function grounded on the freedom of the will, whence arises morality, that is, the power or possibility of performing actions from disin terested motives, even to the^ prejudice of his immediate worldly affairs. He likewise possesses an executive function, the power of acting physically as his will directs, which two functions are in conjoint operation in human nature, and comprise a sove reign power which springs out of the two natures operating on each other, that tends to curb irrational and criminal excesses. This freedom of action in man, or freedom of the 'wii.L, cannot counteract the laws of physics, (cause and effect, action and reaction, &c.,) that is, make them operate in a direction ¦contrary to their pre-ordained course ; but it enables him to oppose or act contrary to the dictates of those laws which direct the animal propensities to supply their wants and to gratify their desires. The motive derived from research into the soul is sometimes so powerful, as to determine man to acts of great danger and desperation ; for example, to induce one to drown himself, another to refuse sustenance, and a third to resist the demand of superior power, and rather undergo tortures and death, than offend his moral feelings by recanting his religious belief ; material or physical nature on the contrary, displays no freedom of will to act in opposition to the laws of physics ^ even the brute creation is propelled by instinct ; though many animals have great sagacity, they form no moral conclusions, (see page 70 ;) all their actions are physical effects, and may be traced to physical causes ; the vegetable kingdom possesses no freedom of action, nor can we trace to the mineral kingdom, or to rocks and stones any moral freedom to regulate their proceedings, or to determine them to pursue new and original courses in this world. 95 Accountable man, the noblest work of God, is endued with the knowledge of good and evil. His actions whether good or evil proceed from the conflict of his two natures ; if he appeal to his moral or rational nature in order to determine on moral maxims to govern his worldly actions, his legislative function operates, and a rule or maxim is drawn forth to direct him as to the way in which he shall satisfy his wants, and restrain his inor dinate pursuit of sensual gratification ; this rule is so modified as to satisfy his human nature, by curbing his animal propensities in part, and by indulging them in part, in order to prevent their running to excess, which would produce the very reverse of vir tuous enjoyment, and entail on him (his soul) eternal punishment. Our reasoning or moral nature being endued with such powers, is surely all sufficient for the direction of man in Ms mortal career, still keeping in view his necessities and desires ; but if our moral nature be not cultivated with zealous fervour, it will, in a great measure, be inoperative, and we may wander far from the path of duty, forgetful of virtue and religion ; and by the gratification of every sensual appetite be led into a course of selfishness, vice, and immorality, whilst we fondly anticipate happiness. This may be termed the state of original sin, which can only be eradicated or successfully opposed by* religious meditation grounded on the moral law within us, (St. Paul's " law of God ") and profiting by the assistance of the learned and devout ; by these means we may regenerate or correct, in some measure, our carnal nature, and fortify the mind in the path of duty; thus atone in part, for the sins of the flesh, under the certain conviction that our higher nature, or soul, will deservedly softer in another world for permit ting those criminal excesses here, which conscience (" the Holy Spirit within us,") decidedly reprobates. Besides our legislative and executive functions, we have^ also an internal judge, Conscience : the " Holy Spirit," that connects us with our Heavenly Father! a Judge that can and does, when we merit it, inflict mental pangs as earnest of what we (our soul) may be doomed to suffer hereafter ; unless by repentance and a new life, we atone for our wicked- 96 ness and obtain forgiveness, which we may hope for, when the moral feeling .of contentment pervades our thoughts and actions. This mental punishment may be so severe, that our physical powers sink under it ; the extreme of misery, the deepest anguish of mind, insanity and suicide, are very frequently the result of the denunciations of this unseen judge ; whose spiritual inflictions we have not the power to counteract, except by regeneration, or the new birth, strengthened by prayers to the Most High for mercy and forgiveness! accompanied by perseverance in this new life devoted to righteousness. As we can consult this judge on all occasions, we are very deficient iu our duty to our selves, when we omit so to do, for his law is not hidden ; let us search our own souls, or as St. Paul expresses it, the "inward man," and we shall never be at a loss to distinguish good from. evil; right from wrong; we shall then perceive in our pursuit after happiness that we are commanded to submit our desires to the dictates of virtue. ON MAN, AS AN ACCOUNTABLE BEING. In the further developement of Human Nature, we shall investigate the actions of man, and the motives to action ; which will necessarily lead us to fix our attention on our animal wants and insatiable desires, which are the main springs to active life, and draw us into communion with one-another ; for they induce us to enter into engagements or contracts for pleasure or profit. We are oftentimes disappointed in the fulfilment of these engage ments, which frequently depends on events beyond our control ; thus feelings of discord and irritation are engendered, and we are too apt to believe that the inability approaches dishonesty, the bare suspicion of which offends our moral feeling. Moreover, these wants and desires lead us into the vortex of dissipation and sin ; very frequently without vicious intentions, especially if we are not well grounded in moral and religious principles. 97 The Almighty has provided for the physical wants of man by the orderly course of nature, and he is enabled to supply them by labour, and industrious and careful habits ; he needs protection from the vicissitudes of the elements, and he erects a dwelling ; he needs food, clothing, &c, and with ingenuity and activity he obtains them ; the supply is generally so well adapted to the necessities of nature, that within our knowledge which extends through many centuries, no species of animate or inanimate nature has become extinct for want of its necessary sustenance. The physical operations of nature which are grounded on the Laws of cause and effect, action and re-action, &c, proceed regularly and without deviation as ordained by the Creator ; and we find experi mentally that physical properties are ever undergoing some change, which if not perceptible at every instant of tim0is yet conceiv able ; we must allow that they become older, which is a change, and age ultimately tends to dissolution, which is another change : whatever enters time must possess sensible parts which are ever changing ; and whatever has a beginning in time must have an end in time. The desires of man are boundless, in truth, insatiable ! they extend far beyond the instinctive feelings and wants of his nature ; they resort to the exhaustless source of Speculative Reason, which enlarges his views the oftener he has recourse to it. The nature of this inexhaustible source is fully developed under Posi tion O, page 32 ; on reference to which, the reader will not be so much astonished at the herculean labour of man evidenced in the pyramids of Egypt, &c. ; when the object in view was the gratifi cation of some ambitious and extravagant desire. Moral sentiments and religious feelings are deadened by the strong hold these desires have on man, as the African slave-trade and the conquest of the New World fully exemplify ; therefore the desires of man demand our first consideration, both in a religious and political point of view; for even powerful Chris tian states attempt to gratify these insatiable desires of human nature by invading peaceful countries, and under the plea of Right derived from conquest or superior physical force, commit the most 98 horrible excesses on the inhabitants, justifying their proceedings by declaiming against the opposition they meet with ; pleading their friendly intentions ; and, moreover, that their object is to benefit their new subjects by the interchange of commodities, and the establishment of legitimate commerce, under the regulations, if not the arbitrary rule, of the conqueror. During the early period of forcible possession, great injustice and cruelty is usually practised ; persons and property meet with little protection ; and under specious pretexts their valuables are seized upon ; and opposers, or the defenders of their property, (under the plea of infraction of treaty, or of insurrection against the new order of things,) are incarcerated or honourably slain, to uphold the unjust domination of the conquerors. In a more appropriate place I will elucidate these harsh reflec tions on Christian States by historical references, for I am truly concerned to perceive that the Christian Doctrines have not operated more powerfully in restraining the inordinate desires of our nature ; for when worldly temptations assail us, and opportu nities occur, we too often outrage the dictates of morality and the commands of the Gospel, and make the Religion of Christ a cloak to conceal our unworthiness. I have devoted myself with great assiduity to the study of the human mind, in other words, to the study of man ; in the hope of promoting true religion, by developing the basis of pure morality, and by showing the folly and wickedness of immoral pursuits, which instead of conferring happiness by enlarging our possessions and gratifying our sensual desires ; usually conduct us on the certain road to discontent, the cause of much domestic misery, if not of extravagant, vicious, and unholy habits of life. The spiritual and moral doctrine taught by Christ and his Apostles, rests on the same basis (St. Paul's " Law of God,") which I am engaged in illustrating, and it is of the utmost import ance that by means of careful study and devout meditation we become acquainted with the main pillar of Christianity— the tri nity in human nature; for that Divine Religion can restrain the sinful desires of our nature, and permit the gratification of 99 all reasonable desires, by a just consideration for our wants and necessities. The desires of Man spring from three different sources. First, from sensual wants and appetites ; Secondly f from intel lectual excitements and refined self-love ; and Thirdly, from pure or holy meditation. These desires result from the three great faculties of the human mind, Sense, Understanding, and Reason. We must bear in mind that these three kinds of desires, influ ence more or less, all mankind at every period of life ; for man, however immoral his conduct may be, is a rational as well as a sensual being, and cannot be entirely free from the operation of the moral law within him, nor from the reproaches and pangs inflicted by Conscience, even if reared in ignorance of his moral and religious duties, or unaided by the cultivation of his moral nature. When the reverse is the case, when he has received the ordinary education of the day, and experienced the good example of his family ; his sensual wants and appetites too frequently lead him into habits of intimacy with thoughtless and extravagant com panions, who inflame and mislead him for a season, and tempt him into vicious courses ; if he escape depravity and sin he is moat fortunate. Such is the order of things in this sinful world, that the excess of sensuality is followed with the certain consequences of disease and remorse ; which eventually propel the mind to medi tation. Reason may then employ these companions of sin advan tageously, first, in attempting to instil into the mind a desire for the purer pleasures of virtue and charity : then, in the arduous task of conquering the evil passions of our animal nature, that hold us in captivity unto sin. First, Sense is powerfully active in the ordinary pursuits of life, which are sensual j and in a great measure necessary for the supply of our numerous physical wants, and for the gratification of our desires. Into these active pursuits we are impelled by instinct, and the necessities of our animal or sensual nature; which although in co-operation with the higher faculties of the mind, Understanding and Reason most commonly tend to lead us on the broad road of depravity and sin ; the 100 restraining powers of reason and the moral law, do not act effica ciously on our sensual nature, until they are sought for by medi tation, and "inward research;" for till then we do not practically possess them, and we are ignorant of their vast importance; therefore they cannot operate with effect on our worldly actions. Education, Religion, Character, the watchfulness of the Law, and the natural desire to retain the respect and consideration of society, induce a very large class of mankind to pursue an apparently virtuous course of life ; while the sensual irregularities and sins they may be guilty of, are committed in secret. Thus, too many of us have two characters to sustain ; one that will bear the light of day, the other which we endeavour to conceal in the shade of night. A more worthless class, who are not constrained by the social and orderly habits of society, associate together, and become initiated in every description of depravity and vice; such, attempt to drown the voice of conscience by high sensual excitements, by drunkenness, debauchery, and crime ; and too frequently they depart this life miserable sinners. An attentive observer of human nature must admit that these various courses are consequenton man, as well as the more praise worthy pursuits oi sensuality. The innocent gratification of sensual appetites, the attainment of honourable distinction, the perform ance of good actions to satisfy our self-love, and the acquirement of earthly possessions, enable us to gratify our desires, and lead to the conclusion (too often erroneous,) that contentment and happiness are the result of these earthly enjoyments. Secondly, Understanding is here viewed distinct from sensible objects, it comprehends intellectual enjoyments and ideal gratifica* tions of every description that are connected with this life. These intellectual results are an operation of the mind, and tend to the anticipation of further pleasureable results ; they comprise a joining of conceptions to conceptions by meditation ; they consti tute the studies of the learned, — the conjectures of speculators,— and the ideal arrangements or schemes fostered in the mind; whether the motives be good or bad. 101 Thirdly, Reason is likewise viewed distinct from objects of sense ; it comprehends sublime and holy conclusions, or ideas grounded on the pure moral law within us; (St. Paul's "Law of God;") it induces mankind to pursue moral courses through the medium of conscience, or the spirit which operates on mortality; moreover, it leads the mind to the anticipation of the highest good, and to a communion with our Maker, by means of the pure religious sentiment within the confines of the soul ; as well as to sublime ideas of immortality in that blissful state, which we hope for in a world to come. Reason, by its powerful influence on our animal or sensual nature, likewise represses sin and immorality, induces a purer course of life, leads the mind onwards to repentancp, regeneration, and ultimately to the New Birth ,- for we are born into a sinful world, and when our depraved inclinations are subdued by the moral law or "spirit within us," we are figuratively Born again unto Righteousness. On reference to the investigation of Reason under the pre ceding head, which portrays the Practical and Speculative branches of that sublime faculty of the human mind ; we shall find that great care is requisite in order to keep a distinct mental view of the essential difference between them, previously to drawing serious conclusions ; for it is highly important to prevent their intermix ing or extending their influence beyond their boundaries. Practical Reason is the basis of pure religion and of the moral law, (St. Paul's "Law of God,") which is not of this world ; and Speculative Reason (a portion of the knowing faculty) is in unceasing action with the things of this world, and is a property of the intellect ; it prompts to inquiry and leads to conclusions that are ever variable, until we arrive at apodictical certainty, and in its activity is always deducing consequences. From the defective tuition of the school of Theology, the misuse of these two branches of the faculty frequently occurs ; which confounds the understanding, leads to serious moral delin quency, excites mistaken conceptions of piety, fosters superstition, o 102 and produces in the minds of good men enthusiasm, and frequently religious tyranny. A reference to the history of the rise, progress, and eventful periods of the various religions that have extended over great por tions of the civilized world, will exhibit the unfortunate abuse of reason, which often occurs, even with the virtuously inclined ; who excited by mistaken notions of duty, have had recurrence to earthly punishments, and to tyranny, to uphold and enforce a particular belief and course of proceeding in this world ; which they conceived necessary to salvation, and which they believed to be the will of the Almighty Creator. This unhappy state arises from the wanderings of the two branches of the faculty of reason, which the study of the science of mind will correct. The pure doctrine of Christ and his Apostles, viewed as a whole, completely invalidates this infatuated mode of proceeding; it teaches us to bear with each others prejudices and infirmities, to do good, not to judgeone another; buttosearch the "inward man," —the immortal soul, and consult the divine spirit — conscience ; which proceeding, will enable us to judge for ourselves, and satisfy the mind how far we have a just right to dictate to others; and it will inspire us with courage to act as that solemn judgment may direct. Besides other evils proceeding from the misconception of the two branches of the faculty of reason, it insensibly prompts our animal passions and desires to the greatest excesses, by encouraging delusive intellectual notions of earthly happiness, approaching in idea to heavenly bliss ; which we may erroneously suppose attainable in this world, by the pursuit of sensual pleasures, or of imaginary enjoyments that are most commonly deceitful, even when attained. Unfortunately this is a small portion of the evil occasioned by the neglect of cultivating reason ; the animal passions and desires when unfettered by moral dictates propel us to such excesses ; that honour, religion, and that love for one another that should operate within us, is weakened, if not obliterated ; and the lusts of the flesh hold powerful dominion over us ; thus instead of striving to comfort 103 &ur fellow creatnres, we too frequently permit the bad qualities of our nature to prevail, and not only give ourselves up to sinful courses, but entice, those within the vortex of our dissipation to the commission of sin, and to the various evils attending a state of depravity. To curb these immoral propensities of our nature, the germ of Which is frequently excited in good men without an evil intention ; Reason must be highly cultivated, which will lead the well- intentioned, and may lead the profligate to a moral and religious course of life, and greatly diminish the carreer of vice and profli gacy. The following moral reflections with their consequent deduc tions, are grounded on the doctrine of Immanuel Kant, as taught by my worthy preceptor Professor Nitsch, the favoured pupil of that great man. Man, whom the gift of reason has elevated above all objects of nature, and who has dominion on earth, is a Being proceeding from the mystical connection of body and soul in vital co-opera tion ; he is far less virtuous than practical reason demands, and infinitely more so than self-gratification, freed from the directing power of reason, would permit. The good and evil principles of his nature are continually warring with each other for the mastery;, sometimes one prevails, sometimes the other ¦ consequently, the best of us must occasionally be acted upon by self-gratification in opposition to moral dictates ! the thoughtless and unprincipled very frequently so, and the abandoned and profligate most generally ! Practical Reason demands, that we should act on principles that are universal and disinterested, and adhere to them unalterably ; we should then be exempt from sensible excite ments, consequently pure or holy, which is not possible in this world ; for the mortal state is both sensual and unholy ; yet every rational man takes an interest in the moral decisions of reason; it is therefore a fact that reason is practical ; that is, it may determine man to action and moderate his desires, To preserve our freedom we must become more independent of external impulse and grow in obedience to the moral law, the basis 104 of which is perfect virtue. If we resort to our reason for infor-' mation, if we ask, can calumny become a universal law ? we shall directly perceive that such a law would destroy itself if generally introduced ; and that in the practice of it, we should stand in opposition to our reason, and must condemn ourselves ; the same will hold good with respect to lying and breach of promises ; whatever contradicts our consciousness of the moral law we must condemn. This law which every man acknowledges he ought to follow, is too rigorous for frail humanity ; no mortal will ever be able to execute it completely, (it is St. Paul's " Law of God j") but man stands in need of such a practical law, his virtue being progressive, otherwise, how could he know its progress ? or indeed, how could he make any, without this standard of moral perfection . Our knowledge of the sciences of physics and of metaphysics, will produce a consciousness that the faculty of desiring in man, is determined both by reason and by sense, but not necessarily by either, because he is a free agent. Whatever determines our will is practically good, when it is grounded on moral laws that are obligatory on all mankind ; but when the will is determined by personal or internal feelings, it is merely agreeable, it may not be bad ; on the contrary, it may be good. When sense or the animal nature preponderates, self-love or internal feelings bear sway ; when reason or the moral nature predominates virtue directs;, if good conduct be the object of both, a perceptible mark or character of the motives that actuate man to either, is discoverable by acute penetration. When the object of a good action undergoes reflection, self-gratification, pleasure, or happiness precede the action, but does not always follow, because it depends on circumstances which are not under the control of man ; whereas, when disinterested virtue dictates a good action which oftentimes has none of the pleasures of sense surrounding it, and is frequently checked by self-love, pure moral duty is the basis, and individual pleasure or happiness does not previously engross the mind; but the moral reward that follows virtuous actions awaits the performance of the act, — a consciousness of* 105 having done a good action from a disinterested motive, which begets a happy and contented mind. When sense produces the desires, they are either stimulated by external objects, or by refined internal feelings, the first stimulant is grossly sensual, the latter intellectual, resulting from refined self-love. The desire of human happiness is sensual because it depends on objects of sense ; it is rationally sensual, because reason modifies its objects, — it is natural to every man ; it is interested ; it is not free, because it depends on physical objects and events that are not under the control of man, but which propel him onwards ; it is likewise boundless, because it aims at absolute totality of agreeable feelings, which all the treasures of this globe, and all the arts and contrivances of man cannot produce. Reason, so far as it has power to influence our desiring faculty is practical, consequently practical reason, the source of free will, mainly determines the motive to action; which if grounded on necessary and universal laws, is pure, but when it is directed by feelings, it is not pure. The affairs of this world modified by reason and the under standing, form the grand object of human happiness, provided they excite pleasing sensations ; our notions of happiness point out those objects that affect us in a pleasing manner, and suggest the best means of obtaining them, and prudence teaches us how to use our reason to make ourselves happy. Yet neither prudence nor happiness contain any general law to guide the behaviour of reasonable beings, for each of these is built on experience, which extending only'to a small number of cases, can never be the source of general laws. Happiness and Prudence cannot impose any obligation upon any individual member of society ; for it is absurd to command how a man shall be happy, since every man has a peculiar manner of being affected, and entertains a different idea of what happiness really is. Prudence and happiness are the genuine abettors of sordid and refined interests, and as all sensual interests corrupt the purity of moral sentiment, their fluctuating doctrines ought not to be confounded with the unalterable laws of morality. 106 It is nevertheless perfectly right to strive after happiness, for it is essential to human nature, and can only be destroyed with the destruction of human nature j but, we have another desire quite as essential to our nature as that of happiness ; we desire to be morally good, consequently we have two great ends in view ; both taken together form the complete object of human desires, or the highest good, and we must necessarily desire both virtue and happiness, as- long as we possess our two natures, soul and body. The highest good does not consist in mere virtue nor in mere happiness, but in the union of both, which state must be supposed possible to be realized; for if it is not practically possible, our desires of virtue and of happiness are directed to something which is impossible ; or, what is the same, they are altogether absurd ; and this conclusion I expect will not be admitted. In the endeavour to obtain the highest good, happiness cannot be made the road to virtue, for by this means virtue would be destroyed, and disorder and confusion would be the immediate consequences ; which cau neither be happiness nor the highest good; for we have proved that happiness is fluctuating, and grounded on internal feelings and experience ; therefore it does not contain any universal law relative to the moral conduct of man. On the contrary, if virtue is made the road to- happiness, happiness will not be destroyed, but only confined, by the universal law of morals, which will preserve it against extravagance, and give it consistency. Hence it follows, that the highest good is practically possible only, when virtue becomes the cause of happiness ; and that man, before he attempts to obtain pleasurable objects, should always reflect whether his inward judge conscience would permit him the free and upright enjoyment of them, or not. A human being whose desires are influenced by the moral law, can entertain no other object than the highest good, and all his actions must ultimately centre in virtue and happiness. As the highest good is not practically possible without virtue being made the foundation of happiness as before stated ; it follows, that 107 only complete virtue can produce complete happiness, and thus render the highest good practically possible, Complete virtue though not of this sublunary sphere must yet be possible ; for if it be not possible, the highest good cannot be possible, an opinion which we have admitted to be absurd. It is true, man cannot be perfectly virtuous, for he is not holy ; he may yet approximate towards virtue, which is an attribute of the divinity : and although the purity of the laws of morals cannot be fulfilled on earth, they must be acknowledged as necessary to be approached in our practice. As we must follow the moral law, and can realize it only by progressive advances, ad infinitum, it is necessary for the sake of our own consistency to suppose such a progress possible ; for, if it be not, the moral law cannot be realized, consequently it is impossible, which would stop the advancement of morals ; for to attempt to practise a law that is impossible to be realized, would not only be nugatory but absqrd. In the physical world we discover the strictest fitness; in the moral world this fitness would be destroyed, if, we conceive that there were any law that could not be fulfilled by progressive advances. It may be asked, what motive have we for judging so ? simply this ; to preserve the use of our own reason, which would be immediately destroyed, if we took away the fitness from the moral world. .. T.he case stands thus ; those who deny the possibility of pro gressive advancement towards virtue have no rational grounds for their denial ; for they cannot defend themselves, by. experience, nor by the innate laws of the mind ; but on the contrary, those who believe in the affirmative, have sufficient grounds for so doing, for without this belief, they could not reasonably resolve to prac tice the moral law, and thus preserve the use of their reason in a moral sense ; which no man will relinquish on slight grounds. Now, as reason imposes the belief that our progress in virtue will be infinite, and as this progress cannot continue unless the reasoning soul continues in existence; it follows, that the highest good is only practically possible on the condition of the immor- 108 tality of the soul. Immortality being inseparable from the highest good, and the only condition under which it is practically possible ; it is therefore a postulate of practical reason, or a posi tion which must be granted whenever we allow that the highest good is practically possible. This analysis of the reasoning powers of the mind, as taught by Professor Nitsch, concludesby enforcing the necessary belief in the doctrine of the immortality of the soul, and in the consequent expectation of Life Everlasting, andaprospectof the enjoyment of the highest good in the pure mansion of God ; after the disso lution of man by death, when the earthly body having returned to earth, its natural element, and the spiritual soul (which is of a heavenly nature) having received at the judgment seat of God its final doom, will either experience that blissful state of eternity so ardently cherished by the devout Christian, or for a sinful course of life will be doomed to expiate the crimes of human nature, by sufferings apportioned by a merciful God. Thus is man an ac countable being. Having investigated the active springs (the physical and meta physical desires of human nature), which lead to the motives and actions of man ; we will now comment on his proceedings or general conduct in a highly cultivated state of civilized society j drawing our examples of the conduct and moral motives of man from a period of history in which Christianity appeared to bear sway ! when our duties to God and man were the general theme, • and occupied all classes of Europeans, from the prince to the peasant. After the dawn of the Reformation by Luther, and his contemporaries, who endeavoured to instil the pure doctrines of the Gospel, disinterested or moral conduct towards man, AND OBEDIENCE TO THE WILL OF GoD. We will select examples from history in preference to indivi dual or domestic transactions, which are usually kept within the bounds of decorum by the police, the law, and a due regard for character ; when morality and religion fail to operate with suffi cient force. The example of the Patriot, of the Legislator, and of the Conqueror will be more appropriate ; for their public i09 Conduct should be more pure than others, in consideration of their experience and exalted stations, ifnd from their knowledge that all eyes watch their proceedings, and attribute to them nobleor ignoble actions, the offspring of moral motives, or the reverse. Legislators and Concjuf.rors who) possessing the power, inflict on the majority of the people, or on large classes of the people, degrading servitude, religious tyranny; or unjust Or partial laws, merit condemnation in this world, and will meet with just retribution in the world to come ; whilst the noble- minded * and the disinterested ! claim the esteem of future generations, and will meet with Merited reward hereafter ; and the gratitude of their country will insure to their families earthly honors, and if circumstances require it, substantial rewards. We will preface this investigation by diving into human nature in search of laws or maxims to guide our judgments ; for, to be led away with ideal notions of perfection on earth, is as absurd, as to disregard the moral law within us. We are not always conscious of this " inward research," yet Legislators and Divines have established moral and religious cod6s, the result of deep investigation into the rational soul, grounded oh the expan sion of the reasoning powers of man. That portion of mankind conversant with general history, are no doubt well acquainted with the great variety of absurd customs, rites, and ceremonies, that have been,and still are, considered moral and religious. It must be admitted, that at different periods, and in different parts of the habitable globe, opinions have prevailed, which have (however erroneously) been deemed moral and reli gious by the most influential members of society, and maintained by art and sophistry, in exact proportion to the prejudices or the degree of moral light infused -into the minds of the people. Exalted moral doctrines entertained by the few, can only operate effectually when adopted by the mass of mankind, who relax their prejudices when the truth flashes on their minds; then absurd institutions lose their power, which falls prostrate at the shrine of reason. This statement has been fully exemplified in the rise and progress of the Christian religion-, as narrated by Gibbon in his Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. p 110 This " inward research" should be carefully watched, to guard us against eliciting maxims lor our guidance that tend too power fully to engender self-love, (which leads to sensual gratification, the forerunner of all evil,) whilst we fondly anticipate happiness. Our pursuit of happiness, or of earthly bliss, even when in unison with prudence, cannot insure us that contentment or comfort of mind which results from a truly virtuous line of conduct, dictated by the moral law within us; — in other words, by the legislative enactment of practical reason. Unless virtue direct our steps, happiness is too often visionary and flies from our pursuit. Although we cannot act as virtuously as the dictates of the pure moral law demand; still maxims for our guidance in this world are derived from that source, modified to meet the necessities and gratifications of human nature. In the pursuit after happiness, (the unseen motive to worldly transactions), we should keep as reli giously within the path of virtue (as pointed out by our spiritual monitor conscience,) as our pure notions of honour, truth, and justice, have the power to impose on our sinful nature. Happiness should be under the control of virtue (the very essence of the divinity within us,) to insure that holy feeling of contentment , that realizes the fiction of the golden age ; and disposes us to hope for eternal bliss in a world to come. This sweet content is always attain able to a certain degree, by a determination (followed in practice) to act up to the moral maxims and Theorems that have been promulgated by the virtuous aud enlightened in every age and country, more or less pure, in proportion to the expansion of reason ; these maxims are obtained by withdrawing our thoughts from worldly affairs, and diving into the recesses of the soul, or into our spiritual nature. The Christian maxim or theorem, " Do unto others as you would have others do unto you;" which has stood the test of ages, always contemplates a change of situation or circumstaces. The Kantesian maxim or theorem, Let the motives uhichin.- fluence our actions, be fit for universal laws, will likewise hear the test of experience. This moral command derived from the " spirit within us " if kept continually in view, will suggest the Ill moral question (previously to the performance of any action involving the slightest doubt) ; would it be fitting that all man kind should act from the same motives that now influence me? Upon the purity of our actions, and the fulfilment of our moral duties as made apparent by an unsophistical answer to this ques tion, depends in great measure that contentment of mind, that enables the afflicted, the poor, and the unfortunate to become com paratively happy ; whilst happiness flies from thepursuit of theam- bitions, the luxurious, and those continually in search of sensual enjoyments ; such too frequently imagine this offspring of virtue to be within their grasp, and are led on to satiety, — to vicious courses, — and to consequent misery. The Kantesian maxim is founded on virtue, which our con science (or the " spirit,") mentally assures us should be the basis of our acts and deeds ; for it contemplates a course of action in this world in conformity to the dictates of the moral or spiritual law within us ; in other words, a fulfilment of the commands of practical reason. This doctrine derived from mental philosophy must not be considered a substitute for the more benevolent and merciful doc trine of Christ ; mental philosophy is a development of the human mind, an exposition of the innate laws that direct the practical working of its two natures ; it is not religion ! nor a substitute for religion! but, by the internal light it imparts to man by expanding his reasoning powers, it enables him to view the vital spirit of Christianity in the sense in which it was imparted ; and to interpret the tropes, metaphors, and parables, free from those material notions that pervaded the minds of the teachers of Christianity during the middle ages, which succeeded the subver sion of the Roman Empire. As moral philosophy expands the mind, universal Christian principles will become better understood ; that is, principles in accordance with practical reason ! or principles that cannot be controverted. For example, truth is a metaphysical or spiritual conclusion, the result of a due exercise of the reasoning faculty; it is invincible, and a portion of that divine law within us, so 112 Often alluded to. Worldly occnrrences, or physical events that are ever succeeding each other, have no property analogous to this divine attribute of our immortal soul, this emblem of the Divinity in human nature. Truth being one of the most important laws of our moral nature, cannot be separated from rational man ; it is an incontrovertible judgment or decision of each of our minds, grounded on demonstration or conviction; the first comprehends the evidence of the senses, the latter indisputable conclusions of Reason. Truth is a moral property of each of our minds, it possesses no physical qualities, (parts that exist in Time and Space,) which are ever changing; truth is an unchangeable moral principle; it is immutable as the God-head. An object, an event, or a circumstance, that is actually known to one of us, is a truth ; another may question our veracity or our judgment, and consider the relation as improbable, or impossible, and withhold his assent till he obtains satisfactory evidence ; a third may disbelieve the statement in part or altogether ; for we are each under the necessity of judging or determining in our own minds as to the degree of credit that historical narra tives, or relations of worldly transactions are entitled to ; it is plain that our judgments depend on our previous knowledge, on the impression made on our minds by early tuition, on example, and the customs and habits of the community of which we are members ; therefore judgments thus formed must necessa rily differ, until the truth can be ascertained with certainty. Truth is certainty, or that incontrovertible judgment that stamps its fair form on our minds in legible characters : it frequently occurs that one person will believe a statement or proposition to be true, another will doubt it, and a third will disbelieve it ; these various judgments arise from the nature of the evidence, coupled with other circumstances that affect the statement, and frequently disincline us to apply the mental powers with sufficient energy to arrive at the truth ; or from the want of the requisite previous knowledge, — the want of opportunity, — the want of efficient teachers, — or the want of mental capacity : thus the utmost cir cumspection is requisite before we finally determine as to the 113 truth or falsehood of any statement ; for in most cases truth and falsehood are mixed up together : even relations of events that are grounded in truth, are not unfrequently collected from the reports of casual observers, — from the interested who have an object to accomplish, or from exaggerated traditional testimony. Under such circumstances the most prudent course we can pursue is to withhold our belief until we can fully satisfy our own minds of the truth.I recommend this cautious mode of proceeding, because it is probable some of my readers may doubt the accuracy of several statements in this work ; therefore, unless they devote their time and close application to the requisite study, I trust they will not venture hastily to determine that what I have stated is founded in error, but rather defer their judgments ; for they*cannot be aware without serious reflection, how very important the study of the science of metaphysics may be to the moral and religious instruc tion of mankind at large. Assertions and narrations of events that have occurred in this world, which purely are historical, and depend solely on the evidence of man, will be disregarded as comparatively unimportant, when the pure truths of Christianity fully occupy the mind ! when pure moral principles engage our attention ! ! A sincere communion with the Almighty in the spirit of the Epistles will then be the essence of the true Christian Church ; for there is but one God ! one Gospel of Christ ! and one Church ! Christianity is not the offspring, not the physical effect of an earthly church under the guidance of a temporal head ; but a pure spiritual communion of man with his Maker. St. Paul assures us, in his Epistle to the Hebrews, (chapters vii. viii. & ix.), that there is no High Priest, or authorized head expressly charged by the Almighty to rule the Church of Christ on earth ; but that the High Priest of the Universal Christian Church is Christ in Heaven ; through whom we address our prayers and supplica tions. There are numerous creeds, and numberless Christian societies on earth, administering the Gospel with a conscientious spirit in the hope of salvation and eternal life. As reason expands, spiritual light will beam upon us, prejudices will recede, and the 114 spiritual doctrine will become more apparent, be more generally understood,— and thus ultimately lead us to a greed approxima ting to universality. Deliberate before you judge, is a very useful maxim; we should carefully avoid hasty conclusions, for we cannot discover the secret motives that determine the actions of our fellow creatures by the results, which afford no positive proof of the good or evil propensities of their natures ; events often derange the plans of short-sighted mortals, and lead to the most unexpected catastrophes. We may pursue opposite courses on grounds equally moral ; (the results do not determine our motives to be virtuous, or the contrary) : much depends on bodily health, on our situation in the community, and on impressions made by education and example. Our notions of honour and of prudence, and ourgrandeur of soul, are as frequently the result of moral and political contem plations, which lead to patiotism, as of honourable ancestry, great wealth, and liberal education ; for these only engender nobleness of character, and devotion to the public good, when self-gratifica tion gives way to the dictates of virtue : but this line of conduct is, unfortunately, so often counteracted by indolent and sensual habits in the higher classes of society, that the wealthy heirs of noble families are seldom capable of laborious and hazardous enterprizes ; the most arduous and glorious undertakings are usually performed by active and energetic plebeians ; who first ennoble themselves, and by their admission into the order of nobles, shed their lustre on that body, and maintain its high character in public estimation. The mass of mankind who live by their daily labour, possess little property, have few acquired political rights, and need few laws for their protection, provided they are free from oppression ; a due performance of their contracts expressed or implied, when grounded on an honourable basis, and due attention to the com forts of their families, become their chief duties to society ; their industrious and .orderly habits tend immediately to their own comfort and happiness. A powerful magistracy able to enforce the fulfilment of engage- 115 ments, and to protect all classes of the people in their lawful occu pations, is of the highest importance ; for mankind live by labour ing for each other in various ways: the affluent, who perform their duty and attend personally to their worldly affairs, are actively engaged (labouring) in promoting the well-being of the community: the indolent in each class are the only drones in society; for the cares of property and important family duties, require the unceasing activity of the wealthy, full as much as do the daily wants of the working classes, i The improvident and extravagant in each class of society are their own enemies, rather than hurtful to the community ; for their profuse habits tend to promote novelty in manufactures and a greater demand ; which is the most powerful excitement to in creased supply, the stimulus to labour, and the forerunner of pros perity and wealth : when their means fail them, they are disre garded for their folly, and left to pine in distress, unless with renewed vigour of mind, they start in some active pursuit for the maintenance of their families ; the property surrendered to their creditors, becomes a stepping stone to the elevation of more pru dent families. The immoral, the profligate, and the criminal, are the greatest enemies to the community; their intercourse and example under mine industrious and careful habits — tend to subvert order and moral restraint — and ultimately lead to profligacy and vice ; which are subversive of all useful and pleasant occupations, and destructive of every honourable feeling. The comparatively few who have acquired great possessions and distinctions, require numerous laws and safeguards to pro tect them; (as pointed out in Principles 1 1 and 12, page 16,) and the greatest care is requisite while protecting their rights and property, not to invade the liberty of the subject; in other words, not to exceed the bounds of prudence, or deviate from the path of justice; for the working classes do not become industrious orderly members of society when they consider themselves aggrieved, but are ready tools, for the seditious to handle at their pleasure. It is of the utmost consequence to relieve this numerous class from any reasonable causes oi discontent, by redressing their grievances, 116 which can only be comparatively few, and by attending to the general welfare of their families ; this attention is the cement that unites the rich with the industrious poor. This duty is incumbent on the wealthy for their own sakes, to preserve order and to repress that insurrectional power inherent in Man, which otherwise can only be subdued by coercive measures, which are always destructive of industrious habits, of morality, and of that sweet contentment, which has generally been considered the inmate of the cottage. The will of man being free to propel his physical actions in the course he may determine, some will pursue one career, some another, some will be acted upon more powerfully by the moral law than others, who may be held fast bound by sensual plea-- sures : some will elicit noble maxims for their guidance, others prudential ones. 1. One man will resist oppression, and will encourage general resistance to the constituted authorities, taking upon himself the hazard of judging in matters far beyond his immediate knowledge, from a persuasion in accordance with his favourite theory, that governments are necessarily arbitrary and oppressive; without reflecting on the immorality, indiscretion, and folly of the governed, 2. Another, considering government a necessary protection to persons and property, notwithstanding acts of oppression and harsh rule may occasionally occur, for man is fallible,^— will train his mind to believe that his domestic duties are of the highest import ance; and will support the established order, rather than encounter anarchy and civil commotion, or endanger his life or his honest means of livelihood on the uncertain issue of a reform ; which if effected might not obviate the evils complained of. 3. A third will heroically defend his country against a foreign enemy at the hazard of his life, trusting his wife and children to the protection of the less ardent in pursuit of what is generally termed honour and independence; though he may scarcely have been able to maintain his family, and pay the taxes : whilst another, after mature consideration, and from motives equally free, will determine to pursue a diametrically opposite course, and will elicit maxims for his guidance less heroic, more prudent, yet in 117 his estimation not less praiseworthy ; which will induce liim to sub* mit to the invader of his country, rather than fly to its defence, and die in the cause of honour; knowing that whosoever governs, they will require contributions from his hard-earned gains. 4. A fourth will defend his friend even at the hazard of life, forgetful of those dependant on him for support : or, will consider self-preservation a paramount duty, and leave his friend to his fate, rather than incur great risk, in consideration of the various claims on his active exertions. Numerous wants and necessities being imposed on human nature, or rather constituting that nature, it would be neither morally good nor desirable, to neglect necessary and incumbent duties from mistaken notions of philanthropy and of patriotism, however high-sounding in public estimation. If the members of each family were united in a common bond, and if custom imposed on them the imperative duty of assisting and protecting each other; promiscuous charity would be less required, and most beneficial results would follow; for both rich and poor families would. not only meet with frequent opportunities, but would find that they possessed many ways of showing their kindness to their kindred. To correct our mental resolves, which may often mislead, we should bear iu mind the moral maxim, Let the motives that INFLUENCE OUR ACTIONS BE FIT FOR UNIVERSAL LAWS, WC should then mentally ask ourselves, ean I desire that every person situated as I am should act as I propose to do ? By this test let us examine Charity considered as a duty. — Is it desirable that every person should give a trifle to casual appli cants ? — Certainly not; by so doing we should not only encourage idleness and imposture, but make begging a profitable employment. /* it desirable that all mankind should be charitably disposed towards those in distress whom they personally know? — Most certainly! assistance thus afforded might tend to relieve them permanently; for being under the watchful eye of their bene factors, their characters would be impugned by improper conduct. is it desirable that all mankind should contribute to Charitabh? 118 Institutions?— Certainly! if without inconvenience to immediate demands on them ; for great benefit results to society by judiciously relieving and fostering the afflicted and distressed, and offering them an asylum. Let us examine the first resolve before stated, by the same test. Is it desirable that all should resist oppression? — Most certainly! but by legal means, because such resistance would promote rectitude of conduct ; whereas, unlawful resistance could not be countenanced by the orderly and well-intentioned: nor could a general unlawful resistance to the constituted authorities be permitted; it would produce anarchy and bloodshed, and destroy very generally the honest means of procuring a liveli hood. When serious objections are started, and desirable reforms made apparent, public opinion, the highest political tribunal, will become enlightened, and judicious reforms will follow if ~the government be erected on a moral basis. When our desires and expectations are not realized, we should doubt, their propriety, and examine minutely the opposing grounds that uphold what we may consider an oppressive or arbitrary possession of power, which we did hope would be surrendered at the shrine of public opinion ; the true state of the close boroughs that are termed, in derision, rotten, fully exemplify this doctrine: rest assured they are the medium through which the monarchy is kept in equilibrium; and through which so much positive good results, that they will not succumb to the demands of the mass of the people, or of the working classes; who are but little ac quainted with the peculiar operations, and the various combinations that constitute a free government; this subject I have fully discussed in a Pamphlet, entitled Critical Examination of the whole subject of Reform in the House of Commons, Ste. I have exhibited in that work the advantages of the borough system, although they do not meet the eye; and if legislators were governed by the old maxim, " Honesty is the best policy," they would withdraw the veil, and remove the immoral disguise that so justly entitles the machinery of the borough system to opprobrium, and subjects it to the grossest calumny and unqualified abuse. 119 r With regard to the 2nd resolve, stated in page 1 16,— Is it desirable that the people (all classes) should, under all circum stances, uphold the government that rules them? much maybe said. Before this question can be fairly answered, the principles on which the government is founded must be duly considered ; if they be in unison with the bad qualities of our nature instead of the good, the basis is immoral, and the oppressed cannot imbibe that love of country which engenders loyalty and patriotism. The following discussion may be considered a digression, but under the present head speculative conclusions may be permitted ; •particularly as the aim and intent of this work is to enlighten mankind on the Science of Government, and to portray the working of human nature, whether under the guidance of virtue or of self-gratification. The moral basis on which governments are founded is disinterested and honest ; it centres in independence, and arises out of a communion of interests ; it opposes no penal laws that can obstruct honest men in their walk through life, unless their prac tices' be detrimental to the good order of society ; public opinion must determine this nice point, and direct the government. Its laws must impartially protect all interests, which Cannot be the case unless all interests be represented either expressly,or virtually, in the governing senate ; it can admit no general law to prevent the members of each class emerging from obscurity and entering the higher classes as they become qualified ; even the honor of becoming senators,, cannot justly be withheld from them. The immoral basis on which governments are founded is selfish and interested ; it centres in dependence, and arises from a prospect of Subjecting the mass of the people to foreign rule, and profiting by their labour; which subjection is a bar to an implied honest compact; it requires the superiority of the few to be maintained by coercive measures, in conjunction with the general appearance of public justice, which can only be appearance, for the essence of justice is disinterestedness, which imperatively com mands an honest compact between man and man. The nearer the immoral basis approaches in action to the moral,, the more 120 submissive and orderly will be the people ; who may not be con scious that they are governed by the law of the conqueror, when that law is mitigated to insure public tranquillity ; for moderation is necessary to the attainment of the desired end. If the government of the people of England be contemplated, which neither admits foreign domination by anti-national troops, nor entertains a dread of offending powerful neighbours when pursuing the path of honour, nor submits to degrading treaties with foreign powers through fear ; and wliich is moreover administered by a senate, that admits the representatives of all great interests, either by popular election, the election ef the freeholder, or through the intervention of close boroughs ; arid of those boroughs where the electors are so few, that by management and money a candidate may be assured of his return : which Litter are equally beneficial to the empire with the more honourable, for in those, private friendship and patronage bear sway ; which in principle are but a degree removed from the direct application of money. (Refer to Principle viii. p. 16.) The candidates being presumed good Englishmen, it is fair to conclude that those who will expend a large sum of money for a seat in Parliament, or will support a candidate at their own cost, must have a great interest to protect or to promote ; and as the protection of the various legitimate interests in the empire is the bounden duty of Parlia ment, it is of little importance by which mode the effective useful members are introduced, for their presence is of the utmost consequence to the well-being of the state. • Universal suffrage would not be calculated to introduce deputies from the Crown, the nobles, and the higher classes, who are as requisite, as depu ties from the Commons, for the good government of so extensive an Empire as that of Britain. As regards England, it is desirable that the people should under all circumstances, uphold the government of King, Lords, and Commons, for proprietors and other influential persons will so direct its proceedings, that most real evils will be corrected as matters of course, and imaginary ones are of little importance. Previously to drawing the attention ef the reader to other 121 governments within the influence of British experience, to enable him to view the question in all its bearings, I will offer a few observations on the moral and immoral basis of governments. Individual virtue and ability may prevail in governments con structed on either basis, consequently a great share of public justice'may be administered where self-will presides, particularlv if the dispensers of the supreme power have ulterior expectations dependant on the honourable character they obtain ; for when the hope of fame, honour, and reward, the ordinary result of a steady course of duty, are constantly in view ; a well administered government may be fairly expected ; which the British govern ment in the East Indies exemplifies, and which is made apparent by the contentment which pervades so vast a population. Had a contrary policy induced the India Company to continue a tyrannical government aftertheyhad obtained military possession of the territory, by degrading the higher class of natives more than was requisite ! interfering with the religious establishments and conscientious opinions of the people ! and exposing to view their degrading state of dependance ; instead of concealing it under a government approaching as nearly as circumstances would permit, to the habits and manners of the people, which has been its policy, irritation and insubordination would have prevailed ; which would have induced the native chiefs to fan the flame of discord, regardless of the misery resulting from civil commotion ; (which is by far more ruinous and less honourable than foreign warfare,) even if they had no prospect of establishing a good and permanent government. Such a system would have rendered British India a dead weight, instead of what it now is, a source of income to the British government and people, and of profit and experience to the military and naval departments of the state. British India became of importance under peculiar circum stances ; European merchants obtained territorial possessions by treaty with the subjects of a feeble and disorganized government ; first, for the convenience of barter, afterwards from jealousy, ambition, and the expectation of plunder ; in their rivalry and intrigues with the native, powers the English prevailed over all 122 opposition, and pltimately became lords paramount of an extensive empire, which they have enlarged and maintained by courage, prudence, and justice. Since the Revolution in 1688, the British government has been better organized than any in the known world ; it has pro ceeded in its plans for conquest and commerce with more perse verance than most European states ; and if more prudence was not exercised in the outset, certainly it evinced a greater desire to correct abuses, and to proceed on principles of government approaching the moral basis. The numberless checks on public men in the British empire, where the voice of public opinion is so decidedly heard, lead to this result. Merchants conquer for ultimate profit ! the military too often for renown ! merchants know that profitable commercial pursuits result from mutual confidence, a contented people, and a well organized government; and that military dominion which is grounded on terror produces the reverse, and leads to irritation and discontent ; and very frequently renders foreign conquest a burthen to a country, instead of a benefit. It may be objected, that a liberal and free system of govern ment is opposed in principle to tributary rule, therefore it is not prudent. We must reply, that when a depeudant state possesses all the requisites for self-government, and for self-defence, with out any foreign assistance, as the United States of America do ; it is desirable for the well-being of mankind, (which will be better promoted by the independence of such state,) that it enfranchise itself and no longer submit to the dominion of the mother country, unless incorporated by an honest treaty of union. " Government is an art susceptible of continual improvement, like all the other works of man, for he can never arrive at. per fection (which is an idea of reason,) yet he may obtain ideal notions of improvement in the art, grounded on the pure ideas of liberty and equality : but the instant he attempts to put his ideal improvements into practice, pure liberty ceases, and his benevolent and patriotic ideas descend to physical operations within the range of the laws of cause and effect, action and re-action, &c. 5 he 123 meets with difficulties at every step; vested rights, prejudices and calumny surround him 5 for his materials (man) are a mixture of self-love, and virtue, (the two natures) in necessary connection; together with ignorance, distrust, and vicious habits ; which lead to partial and confined views, the bane of great and luminous minds. With these physical materials in action and re-action, can Liberty! that pure idea of the rational Soul, maintain her seat? The rude hand of power would immediately displace her; conse quently, the patriot must be content with the discovery and application of moral and physical combinations to counteract the excesses of power, and to induce those ambitious individuals who obtain it, to pursue a course marked out by apparent justice and equal law. Sovereign power when grounded on the moral basis, is the offspring of the holy feeling, Contentment, which results from a conviction of the mind, that as much justice is administered as can reasonably be expected in this sinful state, and that it is the decided interest of the people to uphold the established govern ment. If this feeling be not excited by the judicious proceedings of the government, sedition is readily instilled, especially when the government suffers timid councils to lead it from its duty of equally protecting the honest pursuits of all classes of the people; or when in the hope of surrounding the ruling interest with securities and defences, it promulgates harsh and unjust laws against certain portions of the people differing with them in sentiments, and religious opinions, thereby engendering real cause of Discontent, (which produces great irritation in the public mind,) instead of allaying unfavourable prejudices by just and generous treatment. Ideal securities lead to discontent and insurrection, and instead of inducing submission to the laws and respect for the government, act in an opposite direction ; for if large classes of the people consider themselves unjustly oppressed by partial laws ; another feeling operates, a moral feeling, springing from a senBe of duty towards themselves and families, 124 which will induce them to concert plans and employ all the means in their power, even at the risk of life, to overturn the govern ment or to repeal the oppressive and degrading laws. Reason dictates that laws should be rules and maxims for political and moral guidance, and that the sovereign poWer which results from political combinations, should bear the stamp of impartiality, and protect the just rights of the people. It is the decided interest of governments to unite all classes in one common bond, and to obtain the willing acquiescence of all to their measures, by the exercise of prudence and justice j which compre hend the groundwork of practical liberty, and the essence of political power. The honest and legitimate means of constituting political power consist in fair and honourable dealings with all interests, such means will repress discontent, and paralyse oppo sition; prejudices will then recede, the factious will become imbecile, and the Christian principle, Do unto othe-hsl as you would have others do unto you, will be fulfilled. Sovereignty would then be surrounded with the attributes of Liberty U-Mfustke! and Mercy ! ! To prevent this digression leading the reade^irom the\ suhject under discussion, I will repeat the question.- Is it desirm^/g that the people (all classes) should, under aW circumstances ¦JkeMld the government that rules them ? If the anomalous giJFrnment of Ireland, which has resulted from conquest, be under consideration, we must dive into its history previously to answering this question. Ireland was treated as a dependant on the Crown of England, rather than as an integral portion of the British Empire, until by the treaty of Union in the year 18O0, the two governments were consolidated into one compact political body: we shall conse quently have two periods to comment on. Unfortunately, at an early period, the Irish, a high-spirited people, manifested a greater desire to throw off the yoke of the conqueror, than to enter into an honest compact and communion with the English- who were determined to maintain their conquest, partly to prevent the extension of the influence of France and Spain, and partly from the proximity of Ireland, which offered available resources to a 125 great extent, had Justice, the essence of sound policy, directed the proceedings of the English government. Every renewed attempt of the Irish to recover their independence proved more and more fatal, at length William III. and the succeeding kings of England, having determined to crash their power, bestowed a great portion of the forfeited estates on firm supporters of the British government, on men opposed to the religious opinions of the Roman Catholic inhabitants, who formed the majority of the people. These new proprietors concurred in the unjust plan of depriving the ancient inhabitants of their legal rights, and especially of their church property, and substituted aform of worship in conformity with that of England, which they termed national, and they denominated Ireland a Protestant kingdom : these proceedings occasioned the enactment of a variety of penal laws, which were deemed necessary to uphold the arbitrary act of changing the religion of a country in opposition to the determined will of the people, whose conscientious com munion with their Maker was beyond the reach of. human laws; for neitherearthly rewards, nor punishments, could induce them to abandon the religion of their forefathers, to subscribe to that of their conquerors. Thus the English not only failed in their proposed plan of eradicating the Roman Catholic religion in Ireland, but they forced the mass of the population into active union (by means of delegates) with France, and the Pope, the decided enemies of Britain, and ultimately instigated the people to open rebellion. The failure of this despotic and unwise attempt occasioned an increase of the anti -national troops (English) that had been found requisite, in conjunction with the Protestant inhabitants, in order to keep the Irish Catholics in subjection; thus, a country which under a wise and liberal government would have imparted strength and vigour to Britain, absorbed her resources, and paralysed her efforts. Since the union of Great Britain and Ireland, which it was expected would have removed all fear of those evil consequences which might, arise from granting the Irish Roman Catholics their civil rights ; the British government has been very slow in 126 retracing its steps, and admitting the Catholic population into the spirit of the act of union. Religious antipathy; mistaken pride, or the bad qualities of human nature, must have operated to prevent that cordial union, that Would in time have made the two king doms one people ; by pacifying the discontented, and thus ren dering the military possession of Ireland unnecessary : ' for there would then have been but one interest,— the general prosperity of the empire. We know by experience, the great cost in money and human life requisite to keep an irritated and discontented population in subjection, and the impossibility of depriving them of the physical insurrectional power inherent in mankind, (refer to Pr. 16, page 16.) that will tempt them, when highly incensed, to burn tne dwellings, and murder the inmates of those families they deem' their oppressors. Had the protestant proprietors, the possessors of the greater por tion of the land, consequently, the influential men in the country^ and the guarantees to England for the obedience of the people1; treated the large class of Roman Catholics liberally and honour ably, as generous conquerors should have done for their own sakes ; and had they permitted them to possess a direct influence, however limited, in the governing senate, a much greater degree of contentment would have prevailed, and its attendant, " honest industry, would have produced a new race of proprietors, whose interests would have been identified with the prosperity of the Country, consequently with British Interests ; besides, a vent would have been opened, through which their ill humour and angry passions might have escaped, and they would not have been driven to seek support from those enemies to the Protestant Government— France and Spain. It is unnecessary to mention the Pope, for his temporal power has long ceased, and it is ridiculous to suppose that he possesses any other political power than that which is vested in him by the folly of those governments that attempt to uphold their Own authority by unjustly depriving honest men of their political and religious importance. Such proceedings naturally drive the discontented who may be members 127 of the Church of Rome, to apply to the Roman Pontiff for political as well as spiritual advice; thus the very temporal power so much dreaded, is conferred upon the Pope by the impolitic proceedings of governments. The Pope thus acquires political power, which he did not previously possess, inasmuch.as the members of his Church willingly act on his advice, and no further, Make it the interest of all classes of people to look up to their own govern ment for protection, and the redress of their just grievances, and none will be so irrational as to solicit the interference of a foreign army. Foreign domination too often renders a country, otherwise susceptible of prosperity and civilization, poor and inhospitable ; by driving the affluent from their estates, and obliging them to expend the income drawn from the labour of the people, in another land ; instead of~returning it again to the active population, in exchange for various descriptions of labour, which a residence on their estates would draw forth, and thus materially benefit and enrich the country. .To redress this miserable state of existence in Ireland, a government founded on an honest com pact with Great Britain, was proposed and assented to by the lead ing interests, in the. hope of ultimately relieving all classes from a state of irritation and disorder ; at length a union of the two king doms was decreed, by their separate legislatures, and the United Governmept has been in activity since that period. Catholic Emancipation, the desired boon from political disa bilities,, is expected in time to dispel the feeling of discontent, remove ancient prejudices, and introduce, not nominal, but cordial union ; although not yet granted, still antipathies and prejudices are wearing away, the road to redress of grievances is opening, and there can be no doubt but the Legislature will ultimately discover, that those securities and defences for the protection of the Protestant Church,, (tyrannical laws,) which they have per mitted to. remain in force, have operated in a contrary direction, and have driven; the irritated Catholic population, who are the ma jority of the people, into the vortex of discontent. These supposed securities which are not only deceitful but; injurious, tend to prolong 128 enmity instead of leading to conciliation ; they add no additional power to the government, but detract from its importance, there fore should be speedily withdrawn. Ireland would then become not by mere deed or treaty, but in fact ! an integral part of the United Kingdom, and an accession to its power. The government cannot seriously entertain a fear that a com munion of interests beneficial to all parties, would lead to Treason and Rebellion ! or that the Irish Roman Catholics are more to be dreaded as the friends, than as the open and avowed enemies of a government that possesses formidable means of defence against foreign and domestic foes. As it regards Ireland in its present state, It is desirable that the people should under all circumstances uphold the government : for proprietors and other influential persons are making every legal effort to induce it to confer on the proscribed, political consequence, and equality of rights, which will insure to them a greater degree of contentment and prosperity, and mainly assist to deprive the enemies of the Country of their principal ally, discontent.- If the government of the West India Islands be taken into consideration, very serious reflections will occupy the mind of the philanthropist on the moral and physical power of man. The population consists of a small proportion of white people, (the Masters,) about double that number of free people of colour, or brown ; a few free blacks, and the great mass of black slaves intermixed with a few brown. We will not contemplate the misery and despotism attending the slave trade as formerly autho rized, which induced the native Africans to make war on each other for the express purpose of obtaining prisoners to exchange with slave dealers for the baubles of Europe ; thus encouraging the black purveyors of slaves, to kidnap men, women, and children, for the sordid purposes of gain. This free exchange or barter gave the slave dealer a property in the blacks eo obtained, which could not have been made avail able unless he had the opportunity of transferring it for a more valuable consideration to others in need of their services. The blacks being enabled by their constitutional stamina to work under 129 a scorching tropical sun, that had destroyed the vigour of the natives, and thinned the population of the West Indies, they became highly valuable as labourers there ; and for two centuries they have been torn from their families, friends, and country, conveyed across the Atlantic ocean in a way too horrible to des cribe ; to enable the proprietors of sugar plantations, and other estates, to cultivate them profitably. It is not my wish to harrow up the feelings byahighly-wrought picture of the sufferings of the slaves ; Christian people have undergone equally severe sufferings from the despotic authority of the temporal heads of the Roman Catholic Church, who wished to accomplish an impossibility, by attempting, in conjunction with the civil power, to: enforce a general belief in their creed by the infliction of temporal punishments, excommunications, and threats of eternal vengeance ! in opposition to the merciful and very benevolent doctrine of Christ. The history of the Roman Catholic Church; its courts of in quisition, and its religious wars, fully countenance these opinions. The object of these contemplations is to draw public attention to the physical and moral workings of man, to the expansion Of the mind, and to the necessity of following the example set by Christ 'himself not only in his public addresses, but in his private inter course with his followers ; by enforcing the necessary duty of practical obedience to his commands. Do unto others as you would have others do unto you, is a moral injunction, that was considered by our Saviour of greater importance than the outward observance of religions forms and'ceremonies. Some christian powers which claim territorial right to islands in the West Indies, and to the continent of America, forgetful of the admonitions of the Gospel, still permit the inhuman traffic in slaves, as regulated by law, and grant the proprietors valid property not only in the slaves they may have purchased, but in their offspring, which is contrary to the pure doctrine of Christianity, and in opposition to the public law of the European commonwealth . In Britain, slaves become free the moment they step on its hallowed soil, and I am not aware that other christian powers of Europe admit of slavery, except as a punishment for crime. Such 130 is the weakness of human nature, that for the acquirement of pro perty, not only human life, but integrity, honour, and even 1;he divine displeasure, are set at naught. The domestic government in the West Indies is established by the mother country, for the protection and benefit of the white population, and proprietors, but so mitigated, as to insure submis sion, if not cordiality, between master and slave, who as a fellow creature cannot without great injustice, be treated quite like a brute ; moreover, he cannot be deprived of his physical or. insur rectional power , therefore it becomes a duty which the master owes to himself and family, to pursue a line of conduct consistent with justice and mercy : an opposite course would drive the slaves to rebellion, if not to deadly crimes. The white population being proprietors, are unquestionably the principal objects of considera tion with government ; they expect that unceasing care and pro tection which property more particularly demands. The free -black, and free brown, are stamped with inferiority by the law, and slaves are not even permitted to give evidence on oath, or to possess property, lest it should lead to insubordination. The British senate are endeavouring by degrees to ameliorate the unhappy state of the slaves, by introducing Christianity and political rights among them ; but it cannot fairly commit an act of injustice on the proprietors it has protected for two centuries. Very beneficial moral results may ensue, if the christain pro prietors of slaves, who have been taught their duty towards God, and their neighbour, wiH fully act up to the spirit of the laws intended for the relief of the poor benighted sons of Africa. Should free labour be the consequence of more lenient treatment, it may become a question how far such a change would prove beneficial to those more immediately concerned as proprietors ; or conducive to the general welfare of the colonies. Events daily prove that the weak must submit to the strong, and although the whites are comparatively few (compared with the blacks), they possess so many powerful engines of control, that the mass of the black population would have very little hope of de riving any moral or physical benefit from open resistance, although 131 reason may dictate to them notions of equal right and equal law. Man is a portion of physical nature, (as well as a moral being) and subject to the laws of cause and effect, action, and re-action, &c, which govern physics ; consequently, before notions of equal right and equal law can be made available, all impediments that obstruct the acquirement of the requisite qualification, (Indepen dence) must be done away with. It is useless to repine at our lot, the ways of Providence-are inscrutable ; events are ever propelling each other, and one renders another necessary : having purchased an unwilling slave, we contrive means to secure his obedience, and to make his powers available for our convenience or profit. Fortunately, HappinessIs more within the reach of each individual than is generally supposed,' for in whatever station we may be placed by circumstances, we have the choice of pursuing a course of life that will free us from self reproach, and produce a degree' of contentment, which will insure us a portion of happiness: We may truly rejoice at the prospect in view, for Reason is operating so powerfully on the British* senate, that it is practically amelio rating the condition of those classes of people under its influence, who have been made the tools of power, ambition, and sordid interest. The domestic governments in the West India Islands having been adapted to the sordid interests of the white population' and of British proprietors, are consequently supported by British authority and British troops; the slaves are treated with the care that personal property demands, which exceeds that bestowed on the poor and afflicted in populous countries; they are not worked to the ruin of their constitutions, for such conduct would deteriorate the property ; but they are prevented from acquiring politicalrights, and Christianity has not been generally encouraged among them by proprietors ; probably because Divine Revelation is incompatible with sordid slavery. Events have occurred that have induced the British government to appoint spiritual, as well as temporal protectors, to shield them from wanton oppression; thus let us hope civil and religious liberty will be gradually introduced. 132 By the introduction of more liberal and impartial laws, the free blacks, and free people of colour, may rise in public estimation, and be suffered to emerge from their degraded state; even the slave population must become more enlightened by the introduction of Christianity, and a cessation. of further importation of slaves;. such an arrangement will lead to the cultivation of the mind, and to the rudiments of education ; for with proper care they may from their infancy, imbibe the true spirit of the Christian, Religion,, by learning to Do as they would be done by; thus the domestic government, and proprietors individually, will be compelled by events to pursue a more lenient and moral, course of conduct j by which they may train their slaves to become willing, as well as obedient servants. The slaves who have hitherto been generally considered as mere property in trade, will, under a better arrange ment, feel conscious of. a moral tie between them and their masters, which cannot fail to produce a greater degree of content ment and of self-controul in the slaves themselves ; and , thus necessarily lead, to more dutiful behaviour on their part, and draw forth generous conduct from their owners or masters. With reference to the question under consideration, as regards the British West Indies, it is desirable that the people, including; the slave population, should conform to the laws, and thus support the government: for they have no other hope of amelio ration than through the enlightened policy of the" British senate ; any attempt on their part to obtain freedom by physical force would most probably draw down increased and lengthened misery on their ill-fated race. We will conclude the investigation of the question under dis cussion with a fewobservations on the mistaken views of the Science of Government evinced by the revolutionary legislators of France, , (and the fallacy of the principles advocated by the New ScHoqL* of Politics,) in their attempts to construct a republic, one and indivisible, on their sophistical basis. The supreme legislative power in France decreed: " 1st. That Man possessed natural, imprescriptible,, and unalienable rights. J 33 " 2ndly. That men are born, and always continue, free and equal in respect of their rights. Civil distinctions, therefore, can be founded only on public utility. " Srdly. The end of all political associations is the preser vation of the natural and imprescriptible Rights of Man : and these rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to op pression. •" 4thly. The nation is essentially the source of all sovereignty : nor can any individual, or any body of men be entitled to any authority which is not expressly derived from it." The slaves in the West Indies were included under the word man, and were deemed to be free and equal in the eye of the regenerated French law ; the effect to be expected-^-a r'e-action, followed ; where they obtained power, the white population were treated as enemies, robbed, many murdered, and the majority, to save their lives, were compelled to leave their possessions, which became the property of their former slaves. I have introduced the principles of government advocated in France, to .enable the reader to compare them with the principles promulgated in page 15 ; one set of principles must be spurious, they are so decidedly opposed to each other : this fact proves that the Science of Government has not hitherto been developed. I shall not enter into a lengthened discussion on the •merits or demerits of the Principles of the New School, wliich were attempted to be made the basis of a well-organized Republic in France, ;for the events of that tyranny (goverumentitcan.net be named,) are even now too painfully remembered ; I shall simply offer a few brief remarks to support my chain of reasoning, that Ideas of Reason are not Physical Objects; and although we possess freedom of soul to determine our course of action, still if through ignorance or design we attempt to establish a government in opposition to the natural laws of the science, excesses of various descriptions necessarily take place, and our plans miscarry, we know not why ; and the usual result is, a conformity to the laws of the science, either by accident or design ; for anarchy cannot be endured for a lengthened period, even by its fomenters. 134 We must bear in mind,, that our animal nature only, is in this physical world, (not pure morality,) and must necessarily be under the control of the laws of physics, which allow of no liberty ! of no opposition to their unerring course ; if we were to act contrary to these laws, the fallacy would be apparent, and if we were seriously to affirm that any physical event had occurred in direct opposition to the laws that direct and control physics — for example, that iron floated in the air, and that thistle-down did not; we should be laughed at and considered idiots. It is only when we are ignorant of the basis or natural laws on which the art of government rests, that sophistry can be successfully introduced. Knowledge discards it ! ! for " knowledge is power." Natural Right, is the right we possess of exercising our physical powers in supplying our wants, and in gratifying our desires, as our will directs, subject to the laws of natnre, or of physics ; this right is incompatible with the rights of civilized man, as derived from social compact, or government ! it is only the right of man in a state of nature, and cannot be the basis, that is, a principle or natural law of the science of government; the essence of which is sovereignty, a moral and physical power, circulating immediately through the various departments of government, and mediately through the great classes of the people, in compelling obedience to the law, or to the will of the government ; wliich is very frequently in opposition to individual liberty, personal safety, and natural right. Imprescriptible and Unalienable Rights, are- no other than infinite ideas of reason, consequently, not within the limits of physical operations, therefore cannot be made the basis of the science of government, which operates by a combination of physical materials, in connection with moral principles, which are dis coverable in the mind of man. It would be absurd to attempt to erect any coercive power on these supposed rights ; they are not tangible; they cannot be made available in this world, except as grounds for meditation. We might, with as much propriety, transfer physical notions to eternity, as infinite ideas to objects in Time; and entertain ideas of an infinite stream of pure water, and 135 of an infinite field of arable land, in another world ; such perver sions of reason I have endeavoured to guard against in the pre ceding pages. It is requisite to a clear conception of the sciences of Physics and Metaphysics, and of the line of demarcation between them, that we thoroughly comprehend the specific difference between specu lative and practical conclusions of reason, which have been fully treated of; auditis desirable, with a view to refresh the memory, that we reconsider them, for by frequent reference to an abstruse subject we at last seize the true spirit and thus comprehend it thoroughly. The Principles of Government advocated by the French Republicans advanced infinite ideas (imprescriptible and unalien able rights, 8sc,) which are metaphysical notions, as the ground work of the Science of Government ; a science that flows from a combination of physical causes and effects, and is adjusted in various modes on one set of principles, as the habits, manners, interests, and education of the people may either direct or suffer ; in order to regulate and to govern the changeable affairs of this world, as far as mankind are concerned, on the basis of the moral principles of justice and prudence. Government is a physical struc ture, erected on a moral and political basis, for the guidance and protection of mankind and their property ; indeed, of all matters within the limit of our physical influence: no other things can be subject to government than those within time, which are limited, prescribed, and alienable, or undergoing continual change ; our ideal knowledge of matters without that limit, is metaphysical or spiritual, and is the basis of pure religious and moral princi ples, applicable to the enlightenment of the human mind ; the free agency of which, derived from the soul, directs our physical transactions, but can be no portion of physical properties, which are not free, but on the contrary, pre-ordained in a certain course, and under the direction of the laws of cause and effect, action and re-action, &c, which are irresistible. A reference to the defi nition of Time, page 51, may assist in clearing up our notions of Physics and Metaphysics. 136 The principles, or natural laws of the science, only produce governments approaching the moral basis, by virtually admitting the great interests to co-operate in the government, otherwise all interests could not be protected, which would lead to unhallowed tyranny, or to sedition ; impartial laws result from the influence each interest possesses of protecting itself. Subjection to an anti-national force, or to physical coercion, is a despotic not a legal government, however well it may be administered, it defies all law ; it does not comprehend the moral necessity of a due consi deration for the interests of the various classes of the people, excepting so far as serves the despotic ruler. If pure moral commands submitted in laws and ordinances, and instilled into the rational mind by means of education, would produce fair dealings amongst mankind, and lead to the paths of honour and justice; the ordinance of God contained in the Ten Commandments, together with the pure doctrine of Christ and the Apostles, would not have failed in producing that effect ; which failure is too notorious to need comment : indeed, the general his tory of Europe for centuries after the establishment of Christianity, depicts little more than war, rapine, and the most flagrant in justice ; the certain consequences of weak governments. Even the temporal governors of the church in those unhappy times, appear to have forgotten the humble, benevolent, and merciful doctrine of Christ, which upholds the honest dictates of conscience ; for they composed creeds in councils of church men in furtherance of their ambitious plans ; and, after their suc cessful attainment of great influence over the civil power, they arbitrarily enforced their observance by dungeons, racks, and flames ; to the perversion of that pure communion with God through the soul or inward man, inculcated throughout the Gospel. They even interdicted the Gospel of Christ as an improper record for general perusal, although it contained the very Epistles to the early Christians that converted them by hundreds, and the sub stantial arguments which produced that effect. Having deprived the people of the only genuine source of Christian instruction, they substituted their own creeds, and their own peculiar mode of tuition, 137 by means of their unlimited power over the priesthood throughout Christendom ; and they encouraged a belief among the people, that the solitary prayers of the church, and blind submission to its dic tates, were the only means of intercession for pardon that would be acceptable to the Lord of Hosts : these things they did, instead of infusing the spiritual doctrine of Christianity by means of the Gospel of Christ; which teaches repentance for sin, and a hope of forgiveness by a new life devoted unto righteousness. By secretly investigating the " inward man," with a deter mination to perform the commands of the " Holy Spirit," or the dictates of conscience, and by a future course of virtue and charity ; we should regenerate our carnal desires, and attain the new birth alluded to by Christ himself, and thus be made partakers of the kingdom of God ! ! ! This spiritual regeneration is the only effectual antidote to the selfish and immoral desires of human nature; for we may discover in the worldly-minded, who usually entertain the opinion that happiness centres in the gratification of sensual desires, even among the good, that they obtain as many advantages as they can without outraging public opinion ; and have little thought for the welfare of others. Wealth being a powerful means of attain ment, it is sought for at the risk of life, health, country, and friends ; and we must be blind to the imperfections of human nature not to be assured, that in the absence of law, order, and decorum, (the results of powerful governments, certainly not of religious maxims,) injustice and tyranny are employed as effec tual engines for the acquirement of property. It is only by means of powerful governments that honourable conduct is substituted for the lawless depravity of anarchy, which would drive society progressively towards that unhappy condition of the middle ages, when factious banditti herded in castles, and, under local territorial lords, overspread the fair face of Europe with unheard- of devastation and misery. We will now briefly investigate the third and fourth resolves of irresolute man, stated in page 116. Is it desirable that the inhabitants of a country should defend it against a foreign enemy? 138 Most certainly; for independence is the basis of freedom, and the legitimate source of true nobility. Where the government is grounded on a moral basis, death in its defence is preferable to submission and degradation ; and a simultaneous rise of the peo ple must overpower an invader, and preserve the hallowed soil of their fathers free and untainted for their offspring. Life, with dishonourable submission, and merited self-reproach, is scarcely- endurable ; an honourable death in the glorious defence of our country is decidedly preferable, and will operate as a stimulus to future generations. But, when the government is grounded on an immoral basis, submission, with the mass, may be a mere change of masters, and the question will always present itself, — will the change be beneficial or otherwise ? which consideration must necessarily paralyze defensive measures. In this case patriotism is deadened, and an invader has only to conquer the government, the influential families that support it, and their dependants. The mass of the people are too little interested in public affairs, to be wrought upon to sacrifice their lives for the preservation of a government that did not admit the principle of disinterested ness as its basis. A consideration of the fourth resolve will conclude this head. Is it desirable that people generally, should defend their friends at great peril to themselves ? Certainly not, unless they are so circumstanced, that honour (reverence for themselves) requires them. The age of chivalry has passed away, and reason is now active in promoting virtue, which is evidenced in domestic com fort, in filial and paternal duties ; and in a spirit of philanthropy, but not of knight errantry, or fanaticism. 139 A REVIEW OF the preceding delineation of HUMAN NATURE, Which is in Harmony with the Doctrine of Christ and his Apostles. The great difficulty of comprehending abstruse sciences from books alone, without the aid of able teachers, must be acknow ledged, even by those who have applied the full power of their minds to such subjects. This consideration has induced me to exhibit the two distinct natures of man in a varietj>of positions, in the hope that I shall succeed in making apparent that essential and necessary conclusion of reason, that all within the limit of time must necessarily be phenomenon, caused by the mystical Noumenon, which is out of that limit, therefore beyond the powers of the knowing faculty. The studious reader will pardon this recapitulation, when he reflects on the new chain of reasoning introduced by Immanuel Kant, which imposes on me the duty of reviewing the grand positions laid down by the great author of this Philosophy, more particularly as they are opposed to received opinions. I, likewise, feel it a duty to investigate these abstruse conclusions, in order to render them intelligible, and to assimilate them to the prevail ing opinions of mankind ; and, lastly, to submit them to the critical examination of an intelligent public. If a gleam of light flashes across the mind, and thus leads to strict investigation, perseverance alone is requisite to enable us to probe the subject matter of this work to the very bottom, and thus prepare ourselves to pronounce the learned and indefatigable propounder of this science of mind to be either the most bene volent friend of frail humanity, or a visionary enthusiast. Kant lays down the following positions as incontrovertible. First, that the phenomena of nature, or natural objects, are 140 sensible appearances, or objects of sense, (meaning of the sen sitive faculty of the mind,) consequently, within actual time and actual space, the repositories and limits of that faculty. Secondly, that the human mind cannot actually know by means of its knowing faculty, (sense, understanding, and reason,) any object that is not within the limit of the great faculty, sense, but that it can know (right or wrong*) all within that limit. Thirdly, that the active powers of the understanding, which are denominated categories, necessarily constitute or produce the form or properties of sensible objects, or the phenomena of nature as they appear to the mind, when the sensitive faculty is operated upon by a cause without its limits, (Noumenon,) or when it receives sensations which are the matter of things. This matter of things (the sensible parts) may be termed the main spring, which, of necessity, puts the machinery of the human mind into activity. We must be careful not to confound the reasoning powers of the mind with material substances — with the mortal body, which is a material substance. The mind is the essential man, which St. Paul so frequently alludes to under the denomination of the " inward man.'" Its mysterious connexion with the body consti tutes the human being, and the instant the connexion is severed, human nature is no more. Death is the dissolution of humnn life, and the body may then justly be termed an earthly clod, or a material or physical substance ; fit, indeed, for the practice of the School of Anatomy, which, by a minute examination and dissection of its parts, developes knowledge, that mainly tends to the improvement of the healing art, consequently to the general benefit of the human race. Still, it must be admitted, that the art of surgery has made but little progress in the investigation of * I have frequently used the terms right or wrong to denote that our knowledge is seldom perfect, but a combination of correct and incorrect judgments, which are ever varying as our knowledge approximates to wards the truth. 141 those curious operations wliich the living principle performs in organization. Received opinions, or the ordinary conclusions of mankind, have led to a very general belief, that objects of nature, or objects of sense, (for the terms are synonymous,) are separate and dis tinct from the human mind ; yet these objects are allowed to be in our individual time, the only real time, the time that is ever. within the compass of our sensitive faculty, beyond which we contemplate eternity : or, in familiar language, the world to come, the heaven we hope for. The prevalent erroneous opinion, that things of this world, or objects of sense, (which, of necessity, are in our individual or actual time, and in our individual or actual space,) are separate and distinct from the mind of man ; involves the conclusion, that the actual time and the actual space that receive or contain them, must likewise be distinct and separate from the human mind ; consequently can have no necessary connexion with it. This con clusion of the mass of mankind, which the disciples of Kant hold to be erroneous, is the great bar that opposes the intro duction of true mental philosophy. Until this important con clusion be satisfactorily established in public estimation, no sound mental philosophy can exist. Although public opinion, in the absence of sound teaching, has apparently disconnected objects of sense from the human mind, and determined them (erroneously) to be beyond the limits of the mind : this decision when critically examined, is neither upheld by reason, nor by common sense. Deeper investigation will prove it to be erroneous, for objects of sense are inseparable from the human mind, and not distinguishable from our actual or intnitive knowledge. I consider this general but fallacious judgment to have taken its firm hold of mankind, in consequence of their not having been taught to keep distinct, and to separate in their minds, objects of sense or actual things, (which must be present to them, or exist in their actual or individual time ;) from conceptive things, which are absent from their sensitive faculty, consequently, not 142 within their repositories for sensible things, their individual, or actual, time and space. Objects of sense, or actual things, being in our present, or individual time, and necessarily under mental view, are m our estimation, whatever the judgments of the mind determine them to be, whether these judgments be correct or not. They are not distinguishable from our actual knowledge, nor can they be sepa rated from our minds : therefore, when the public opinion assumes that these objects are distinct and separate from the mind, it errs, and puts them on a footing with conceptive objects, which latter, most certainly, are not only separate and distinct, but absent from our sensitive faculty ; that is, not within our individual, or present time, or within the reach of our senses, but are purely compre hended by the understanding ; another great faculty of the mind . (See page ^3.) If this were not the case, but, on the contrary, if conceptive things were considered real, ordemottstrable to our sense, actuality, or existence in our immediate or individual time* would be requisite. Conceptive objects would then cease to be con ceptive, and would become perceptive, or objects of sense; that is, actual things ; and then not distinguishable from our immediate judgments, or our actual knowledge. In truth, conceptive things are only notions of things treasured up in the mind, and with propriety are termed conceptions or conceptive knowledge. It is most desirable that this doctrine should be patiently and thoroughly investigated, and that we should withhold our assent to the high-sounding epithet incontrovertible, until we are fully convinced that no argument can overturn it. We should minutely * I mean the time that is ever present, or in connexion with my indi vidual sense, the perceptible instant between the past and the forthcom ing time, as far as regards me; in other words, the actual or individual time within the compass of my sensitive faculty, that holds my sensible objects separate or distinct from the time that holds the sensible objects of other persons ; which I can only have a conception of, because it bas no immediate connexion with my sensitive faculty. 143 investigate the following questions, for the purpose of arriving at sound judgments. First. Are objects of sense, or phenomena of nature, (real or actual things,) so identified with the mind, that they are inse parable from it ? Secondly. Can real things, or phenomena of nature, be objects of sense, and yet be distinct from the sensitive faculty of the mind ? Let us carefully try these questions. Very little investi gation will be required, in order to obtain the admission, that all objects, to be objects of sense, must necessarily be within the limits of our sensitive faculty, consequently present to us, or in our present time ; otherwise they cannot be objects of our sense : ^>n no other condition can they be real things, or objects of our sense. If this be the true state of the case, it is impossible to separate real, or actual thiugs, from our sensitive faculty ; more especially so, if we consider that it is our sensitive faculty only, that enables us to demonstrate the reality, or existence of things to the mind. We cannot actually know that a -thing is a reality, unless it affect our senses ; we cannot prove that a thing exists unless it be in our actual or present time ; nor can we, by any effort of ingenuity or contrivance, disjoin or separate time (actual or present time) from the sensitive faculty of the mind. If this be a correct statement, we cannot maintain the posi tion that objects of sense or real things can be separated from our mind, and at the same time assert that they remain objects of sense : the very supposition involves a contradiction in terms> and is therefore absurd . Hence, we must condemn the very general, though delusive judgments, which are formed by the. mass of mankind, and admit, that Kant's new chain of reasoning is founded on facts. We must be conscious that when objects, or things, do not affect our sense, or are not present to us, we can only have conceptive knowledge of them ; and that mere concep tive knowledge, cannot by possibility, possess any real or substan tial properties to affect our sense ; we may imagine certain con ceptive objects to be in existence at this time, but we cannot de monstrate that fact, without having the objects within the repository 144 of our sensitive faculty ; in other words, within the time in con nexion with our individual sense ; which we may term our actual time, the only time that is real or sensible to us. Neither the time that is connected with, or is present to other sentient beings, and that holds their sensible objects, nor the past hour, and the hour to come, are our actual time; we have only conceptions oi them. If we cannot distinguish or separate objects of sense from the time and space that ever accompanies us, consequently, hich are ever in immediate connexion with us ; in fact, which are inse parable from our sensitive faculty ; we shall be compelled, by the moral force of truth, which emanates from the soul, to abandon the erroneous opinions so prevalent in society ; and we shall have cause to rejoice that reason has made a grand effort — that a day star has appeared, directing us in a purer course — that a philo sophy founded on the basis of reason, is now developed, — a philo sophy that will not only enlighten mankind, but firmly uphold pure religion — a philosophy that must convince the unbeliever, of the truth and importance of those Christian principles which are inculcated in the Gospel. To attempt to prove by any lengthened argument, that no other repositories than actual time, and actual space, could receive and hold, real or actual things, would be superfluous : these repo sitories I have shown to be inseparable from our sensitive faculty , and I have fully elucidated them in page 51. In the endeavour to find receptivities or repositories, out of the limits of our sense, that would hold our sensible objects, we fall unconsciously into the belief of a real time and space, not present to us. Now, time and space not present to us, or not within the compass of our senses, cannot be real to us, nor can they hold our sensible or real objects, for these must be present, or in our actual time, to affect our sense. Things that are absent from our sense, are con ceptive only, and in a conceptive time and space, and are not real so far as regards us; in other words, are not positive objects of our sense, but conceptive objects only. The instant the natu ral or sensible object is unconnected or separated from our sen sitive faculty, it ceases to be a real or actual thing to us ; it is 145 conceptive only, and we have then no possible means of demon strating its actual existence. We may form conclusions respecting it, and these conclusions may be sound and true ; but the once real thing, the once sensible object, being no longer within the limits of our sensitive faculty, is no longer in our present time, therefore beyond the reach of our actual knowledge ; it is no longer in existence as concerns us. Should it again come within the limits of our sense, new judgments will be drawn forth ; it will be older, and it may differ in other respects from the conceptive knowledge we had previously stored in our memories concerning it, as regards its former qualities, or peculiar properties. We shall be induced, by the irresistible power of truth, (a pure idea of reason, which possesses no earthly quality,) to search deeper still into the " inward man," in the h6%e of obtaining a more luminous view of the mind, than we at present possess. Jesus Christ and his Apostles have declared, that, the spirit of God dwelleth within the mind, and that the kingdom of God is within us. The mind must consequently be infinitely more exten sive than actual time and space, which hold only those objects which are really within the reach of our senses ; for it possesses the faculty of reason, a faculty as unlimited as infinity, thus adequate to the reception of its ideal or spiritual objects. St. John affirms,' that " God is in us, and we are in him ;" which can only refer to that divine portion of the mind, pure reason, which is a faculty of the soul : consequently, through the reasoning mind we are in communion with our Almighty Father whenever we are under the influence of the moral law, or of the spirit within us. This comprehensive view of the mind, accords with Kant's doctrine, which clearly proves that actual time and space receive and hold its sensible objects; and that reason, the God-like property of the soul contains its ideal or spiritual objects. The mortal body, considered as an object of sense, must be viewed distinct from the mind. The operation of the sentient faculty of the mind, is limited to material substances, including the mortal body. The reasoniug'faculty is of a spiritual nature, and operates in another sphere, beyond the limits of the material world ; consequently, be-' 146 yond the powers of our actual knowing faculty ; therefore our knowledge of mind can only be ideal or spiritual. To elucidate this very abstmse point, to establish the basis on which Kant's Philosophy of Mind rests, it' may be neces sary to reconsider with marked attention, what has been ad- vanced on the animal nature of man, (page 48,) under which head, the prevalent opinion, that objects of nature, or objects of sense, as well as actual time and actual space, are distinct and separate from the human mind, has been fully discussed ; and an attempt made to prove those opinions erroneous — with what degree of success this object has been accomplished the reader will form his own judgment, after comparing the facts and reason ings on which the doctrine is founded. Should any false premises, or erroneous conclusions be detected in the system itself, then, ipdeed, will the sage of Konisberg be deemed a visionary, and an enthusiast ; but, should any statement in this humble effort, be at variance with the important truths recorded by the founder of the new philosophy ; the judicious reader will in candour, attribute such discrepancy to the great difficulty oi clearly communicating the true spirit of Kantesian Philosophy in a popular form. Great care is requisite, to keep the sciences of physics and metaphysics, (which arise out of the study of the two natures of man,) from intermixing in themind, and thus confounding the under standing. In truth, they are more distinct in their operation than fire and water. Physical properties and events, are governed and propelled by the laws of physics, cause and effect, action and re action, &c, which are confined to operations within time, and which necessarily. succeed each other. Metaphysical or spiritual ideas, on the contrary, are infinite, and operate within the bounds of reason, or the divine functions of the soul, previously to their influencing or directing the physical actions of man. Metaphy sical or spiritual ideas, which we have termed ideas of practical reason, most certainly are not within the confined limit of actual or present time, nor do they include absurd or impossible conclu sions ; they are very distinct from speculative ideas, which are a 147 portion of the knowing faculty, and limited to the science of physics ; therefore liable to all the absurdities of the imagination. Metaphysical ideas, to be valid, must be susceptible of producing conviction in the mind, of the trufh of the position, or pure idea stated ; in fact, the contrary conclusion must be incompatible with the dictates of reason. Very little reflection will induce us to admit, that the reason ing mind very frequently directs the physical powers of man to act as his will, (the result of inward meditation) directs ; to which operation of the reasoning soul, we trace new events in time, steam engines, gas works, &c. Events in time are physical, and under tho influence of the laws of physics ; they cannot advance a step in opposition to the pre-ordained course of nature, or of natural objects, without the intervention of miracles. The bare supposition of physical properties operating in opposition to their own laws, would be denounced absurd, and contrary to rea son ; indeed, the divine regularity and scientific order of the works of God, with which we are acquainted, are at variance with such opinions. The sciences of physics and metaphysics, comprise all the operations of the human race : the first includes all events in time ; the second contemplates the causes out of time, (noumena), that originate phenomena, or things of this world ; it likewise treats of ideal or spiritual existences, which are inaccessible to the senses, because out of the limit of time, but yet within the range of the laws of reason, that confine its conclusions (although infinite) within the operations of reason ; otherwise, conviction would not operate within the mind. To the science of metaphysics, we not only trace the conviction in the human mind, of the existenee of the Almighty Creator, in a different state from the mortal ; but of his attributes, omni science, omnipotence, omnipresence.* » Omnipresence does not imply ever present in physical matter, which exists in time and space ; the carnal body for instance. Time and space are but the repositories for corruption, which St. Paul deelares cannot 148 Moreover, the pure spiritual doctrine taught by Christ and his Apostles, is made evident, by the science of metaphysics; for, as puysics is the science of earthly things, metaphysics is the science of heavenly things ; and only requires to be correctly developed, in order to elevate the evangelical writings in public estimation, and satisfactorily prove their consis-tency, truth, and divine origin. Before we close this section, which may be termed an Essay on Man, (for it deeply investigates his three distinct natures under the heads animal, moral, and accountable,) we will com pare the doctrine resulting therefrom, with the doctrine of Christ and his Apostles ; and recapitulate the spirit of those portions of the work, in which the doctrine of the mortal body, and of the immortal soul, are fully expounded. Presuming that the grounds on which this exposition of human nature rests are correct, the following statement will be completely borne out by the deductions fairly drawn from the preceding development of the human mind. The mind of man is propelled to activity, that is, to produce to itself intelligible objects, or phenomena of nature, by a mys tical something in another sphere, that operates on our sensitive faculty, and is the origin of sensations, or first effects within the receptivities or repositories of that faculty ; (actual time and actual space). This undefinable power, or influence, Kant has deno minated Noumenon, because it is the mystical cause of pheno menon ; others denominate it the influence of God, the divine spirit, the soul of the world, the divine will, or, with St. John, " the word," (John, c. i. 1.) Christianity is grounded on this sentiment of the soul. " The earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the inherit incorruptidh. Omnipresence denotes, that God's pure spirit, or law is ever present in our reasoning soul, which is not within time, yet in mystical connexion with the body. In other words, God's spirit ever per vades or influences Bis works, and continues them in their orderly or scientific courses. 149 face of the deep. And the spirit of God moved on the face of the waters," (Gen. i. c. 2,) or was in connexion with, or operating upon, physical matter. This spirit we desire to express by the word Noumenon, which we conceive to be the spirit of immor tality influencing mortality. Whatever we may denominate the mystical cause of events in time, it is derived from the will of the Omnipotent Creator ; and it originates sensation, the first effect received within the sensitive faculty of the human mind ; in other words, the matter of things, that instantly propels the understanding to produce the general form, which, together, Constitute the phenomena of nature to the mind ; that is, determines the forms or properties of the sen sations or matter received.. The judgments of the understanding analyze the objects of sense, and produce to us knowledge that may be correct or incorrect, which it treasures in the memory, and retains when the sensations disappear, or when the Noumenon ceases to act on the sensitive mind ; but we must bear in mind that a knowledge of things, without positive proof, is at best but an approximation towards apodictical certainty. — (See page 24.) This is the regular process of physical or intuitive know ledge, or of experience, which is ever varying as new and more enlightened judgments and conclusions supersede the former. Metaphysical knowledge, on the contrary, which is termed spiritual or ideal, is of a different character ; it is the result of in ward meditation, wholly free from any sensible parts or effects, though drawn forth by meditating on natural objects : it is the communion with our own soul, by means of the faculty oi prac tical reason, through which the divine will is revealed, or acts on mortality, when it pleases the Almighty to make us his especial instruments. Christ said, " It is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you." (Matt. x. e. 20.)' And again, " Whatsoever shall be given you in that hour that speak ye, for it is not ye that speak but the Holy Ghost." (Mark xiii. c. 11.) We have but to search, and we shall find. By means of this pure science, the road to salvation will be cleared of obstructions, u 150 and we shall be taught to appeal to, and to reverence, the dictates of conscience, or the " Holy Spirit " that speaketh within us ; and thus avoid those mental tortures to which sinners are subjected as a punishment for their wilful opposition to its dictates. The following results will be evident after a patient study of Kant's Philosophy of Mind. First. That two distinct and separate natures, the animal and the moral, are the component properties of man; from the operations of which, in mystical and necessary connexion, proceeds human nature; which is threefold or triune : differing from either of the former, although proceeding from both. Human nature com prises body and soul, and is endued with the knowledge of good and evil : the soul will account in another world for the sins it may have permitted in this sublunary sphere, and though a com ponent part of human nature, it must not be mixed up, even in thought, with the mortal body; it is in another state, and not within time. The animal man, without the mystical connexion with his reasoning soul, would not have been human or. rational man, but must have ranked with the brute creation. Secondly. That the. physical or animal nature is mortal, and subject to physical wants and desires ; is governed by the laws of physics, and liable to the vicissitudes peculiar to things within actual time, and actual space; the repositories of sensible objects. The animal man has a beginning in time, and must have an end in time ; that is, dissolution or change must take place, for all within time is subject to change, or is ever in action and re-ac tion, alternately cause and effect ; consequently, a limited period of duration must necessarily be contemplated. Duration, which implies limits, is incompatible with immortality, or eternity. Thirdly. That the pure moral nature (the metaphysical) , which is grafted on the soul, is immortal, or free from the limit of time ; it is in a different state from the mortal, and not susceptible of division into parts in extension, and parts in succession ; which are the necessary properties of physical things : consequently the pure moral nature is not within the operation of the laws of physics ; it is a reasoning power, conscious of good and evil, free to direct 151 and to determine the thoughts and actions of human beings in favour of good principles, when zealously applied to by frail humanity, even when opposed by the lusts of the flesh. Fourthly. The certainty that man is endued with freedom of will (derived from his moral nature) to direct and control his thoughts and actions, produces the conviction that he is an ac countable being, burdened with high responsibility, for the good or evil administration of this trust. A due attention to our spiri tual monitor, conscience, will warrant the expectation that the soul will be rewarded, and that a culpable neglect of that duty will draw on us (the soul) merited punishment after the mortal career is run, and the earthly body is returned to dust ; for then our connexion with mortality is dissolved, and the spiritual soul of man will appear at the Throne of Grace, to receive judgment at the hands of the Almighty. Reason justifies the conclusion, that some atonement may be made, even in this world, for immorality and crime; these may, in some degree, be expiated by subsequent acts of justice and cha rity grounded on repentance, and more than ordinary love, kind ness, and charity, towards our neighbour ; united to a lively faith in God's mercy. Such repentance will regenerate us in our own moral estimation, and we may thus attain to a new birth unto righteousness, which, let us hope, will operate powerfully at the mercy seat of God. This virtuous course will produce resig nation, or a patient endurance of the ills of life, in the hope of more prosperous occurrences; and will encourage us in the expec tation that a morally good life will tend to ensure us eternal hap piness in a future state : which feeling must operate to damp any sinful desire we may entertain of overcoming worldly embarrass- - ments by moral turpitude and crime; and will make us more contented with our lot, and not only lead to health, but to honest and industrious habits, the forerunners of happiness. The resemblance between the results derived from Kantesian Philosophy, and the doctrines expounded by Christ and his Apostles, incontestibly proves, that Emanuel Kant has truly developed the faculties of the human mind, and laid down principles, or laws 152 of reasoning, that will ultimately enlighten mankind on meta physical subjects ; and open to mental view the almost incon ceivable expanse of the mind of man ; for the sentient and rea soning faculties of his mind contain all sensible, as well as all ideal, or spiritual objects. The spiritual doctrine of Christianity, the essential basis of true religion, is grounded on reason ; which will more fully appear ' on a careful perusal of the Epistles of the Apostles, who rested their teaching on sound conclusions of reason, grounded on the mystical connexion of the divine, or reasoning soul, with the mortal body; and on the communion of Man with God the Father, through the medium of Conscience, or the " Holy Spirit." It is most worthy of remark, that the Apostles do not attempt in their Epistles to uphold their doctrines, or even to strengthen their arguments, by reference to the miracles of Christ; which they knew could only be received (by those ignorant of the occurrences). as facts resting on their own individual testimony, and that re ference to miracles that had not operated so powerfully on the people, as to stamp a general belief of their reality on the minds of the inhabitants of neighbouring cities ; might operate to their prejudice. General publicity would necessarily have called the attention of the constituted authorities, and of contem porary historians, to a minute relation of such very remarkable events ; which circumstances did not take place. The Apostles knew that the miracles had not obtained general publicity ; Chris tianity made its early advances in private, and years elapsed, after its first promulgation, before St. Paul became a convert to Chris tianity. The Apostles, being thoroughly convinced that the essential. doctrine of Christ was grounded on pure reason, consequently- standing in no need of adventitious support, very wisely abstained from recounting miracles in order to establish the truth of their doctrines. Some of their hearers might entertain doubts as to the truth of miracles they never witnessed, because they are occur rences contrary to the laws of nature, and can only come to pass when the Creator deranges the order of nature for some especial 153 purpose ; either to impress the minds of those who witness them with evidence of his power, or to confer on individuals whom he has appointed his especial instruments, a divine power of disor ganizing his works, or to enforce particular doctrines, or belief in the minds of a select few, who are not previously prepared to receive it in any other form less impressive than that of miracles. Miracles most certainly are contrary to our experience, and we should not be justified in believing them to have occurred, without being satisfied in our own minds, of their truth ; yet they were not contrary to the experience of the followers of our Saviour, who actually witnessed them ; others did not generally believe them in those days. Christian principles, founded on pure truth, need no sup port from miracles, they are within the precincts of reason, and incontrovertible ; they must stamp conviction on the minds of all who are faithfully instructed, and fully acquainted with their pure origin, and inestimable importance. Until we search inwardly, with an ardent desire to discover the metaphysical germe, or spiritual ground-work on which these pure Christian principles rest ; we cannot expect, nor are we entitled to receive, that satisfactory knowledge of God's mind and will, which must ensure us happiness both here and hereafter. It is most consolatory to reflect, that it is not absolutely necessary to prove the truth of the miracles recorded in the New Testament, in order to establish the truth and importance oi the Christian dispensation. We have sufficient external and internal evidence to satisfy all reasonable men of the truth of Christianity, even if miracles were not contended for or satisfactorily proved. We believe miracles on the veracity of those who witnessed them, and put faith in their testimony. Kantesian Philosophy will no doubt lead conscientious deists, who profess to ground their belief on reason, to more elevated and sublime conceptions of their omnipotent Creator, and of their immortal soul ; by clearly exhibiting that link which connects them with their Heavenly Father in another world ; — that link which allies them with eternity, and which they must 154 mentally acknowledge ; for, (as observed in p. 18,) " we shall find it impossible to free ourselves from the consciousness of a de pendence on the infinite justice and mercy of Almighty God." Kantesian Philosophy must likewise assimilate the two opposite doctrines of necessity, (or predestination,) and of free- agency ; and reduce them to the standard of pure christian prin ciples. A moderate degree of serious meditation, grounded on the premises advanced, will enable us to solve the questions which have not only puzzled the learned, but which have introduced schism into the christian church. Is MAN A PREDESTINED AGENT? 01", IS HE A FREE AGENT? The marked distinction between our two natures, if clearly laid down in these pages, will unravel this complex web. Man, considered only as a portion of the physical world, is a predestined agent, for his animal nature is dependant on the un bending laws of physics, cause and effect, action and re-action, &c; consequently, as far as his active proceedings in this life are con cerned, he is strictly a necessitarian ; but, man, viewed in connec tion with the moral world, is strictly a free agent ; for he is endued with a reasoning soul, and freedom of will, to determine the course of active proceedings he may choose to pursue, although he cannot oppose the laws of physics. He is free to select and to pursue the course of life he may determine on, let the consequences be good or evil! — be they ever so fatal! and his spiritual sonl is amenable to his Heavenly Father at the day of judgment, for his worthiness or unworthiness. These doctrines exemplify the human, or mysterious triune nature. The soul, or moral nature, originates spiritual ideas; and through the medium of the " holy spirit" conscience, moral thoughts and actions operate on man ; the animal nature has ne cessary wants, and carnal desires to be gratified, which produce the conflict in human nature, between the good and evil principles in man ; this is made apparent by his moral or immoral conduct in this sublunary sphere ; either by pursuing a course of life com patible with his two natures, or by suffering either to predominate, and to lead him into deplorable excesses. 155 Hence the doctrine of predestination cannot be maintained in opposition to free-agency ; for the will of man is free to direct his course in this life, but not to contravene the order of physical events. If the immortal soul, (the seat of reason and the moral law), were not without the limits of physical properties, (time and space), it would not be free ; but, on the contrary, it is ever in its immor tal state, and only mystically working in unison with its allotted portion of animal or physical matter. Good and evil, virtue and vice, are made evident to us by the dictates of conscience ; but the wants and gratifications of our animal nature are so imperative, and so decidedly selfish, that when conscience, the organ of the moral or spiritual law, commands honest and disinterested conduct, as the sure road to heavenly joys ; the flesh rebels, evades, and promises, that, when certain selfish desires are gratified, then the remainder of life shall be devoted to good works : too often these promises are deceitful, and ambitious projects tempt us to engage in. worldly pursuits as often as the expectation of their attainment become probable. When these worldly transactions do not grossly offend the moral or spiritual law within us, when they are connected with acts of goodness, and with kind feelings towards those with whom we come in contact, a great share of happiness follows, and we become useful members of society. We are also good members of society, if we satisfy conscience, and the religious sentiments that pervade man, which may be made apparent by the zeal of our inward research, or by devotional medi tations ; that we have performed our duties to God and man as virtuously as could reasonably be expected in this sinful state : for being born in sin, that is, into a sinful world, perfect virtue cannot be expected from the best of us ; it can only be realized in another and a better world ; for it is most assuredly incompatible with the circumstances of this probationary sphere. Many — very many, grossly offend against the dictates of conscience, and are thus led into vicious courses, but, when reason predominates, even such men may become good members of society ; and under the powerful 156 influence of religious sentiments, they commune devoutly with their Maker, repent of their former ways, and, in the language of Christ, are born again unto righteousness ; they then pursue a vir tuous course of life, submitting their worldly desires to the dominion of conscience. It is impossible to divest mankind of religious sentiments ; they are grafted in their very soul. Unhap pily, the manner in which some religious establishments have been directed and upheld, by human laws and customs, has not un- frequently led to tyranny, injustice, and civil and religious warfare ; which is the more deplorable^ because diametrically opposed to the injunctions of the gospel of Christ, which recommend and command forbearance to one another's weaknesses, advocates integrity in all our dealings, and universal charity towards our fellow-crea» tures. We cannot divest man of the consciousness of his dependance on the Almighty, and of his accountableness for the due observance of the moral obligations enjoined on him; the due performance of which, with zeal, will encourage him to hope for everlasting hap piness in God's kingdom ; but the neglect of which will entail upon him severe denunciations. In order fully to establish this philosophy of mind, which un folds the two natures of man, I will appeal to the teaching of - Jesus Christ and his Apostles, which supports all my deductions in their entire spirit, and solves the doubts expressed by Paley, in his Moral Philosophy, chap. 5, to which I have directed the reader's attention in p. 36. I have attempted in the foregoing investigation, to establish the doctrine of the mortal body, and the immortal soul, and to unfold the moral and physical natures inseparable from human beings ; which, from their mystical operation on each other, pro duce the Trinity in man. One of these natures (the physical, or animal body,) is corrupt, because within time, consequently, limited in 'its duration ; the other, (the moral, or spiritual soul,) is incor rupt, and not within time, but in a state of immortality : the former of these is within the limits of this mortal sphere, the latter in the region of infinity ; from the two, in conjoint and ne cessary operation, proceeds the human or triune nature ,- and the 157 kfiioLY spirit," conscience; thisactiveor influential agency between God and man, is the third person in the trinity, Pious meditation, with the occasional assistance of intelligent Christian friends, will enable us to unravel these metaphysical or spiritual ideas ; and we shall discover in our contemplation s,pure christian principles arising out of our pure notions of the moral or spiritual law, and of the mystical influence of the divinity and mortality in human nature. Christian principles must be deno minated universal, when they are in accordance with reason, and not susceptible of refutation. Presuming the basis of human nature, as herein laid down, to be correct ; we must believe in one God, the Father Almighty, and in the pure universal doctrine of Jesus Christ and his Apostles ; which, although explained by mankind in various modes and forms, for the good order and moral benefit of each community, still there is but one gospel of Christ, and one church, the high priest of which is our Redeemer in Heaven. We can have but little doubt that we are born into a sinful world, and that when moral regeneration takes place, we are, figuratively, born again unto righteousness ; further, we must believe, that at the dissolution of man by death, the carnal body returns to its native earth, and that the soul, or " spiritual body," will be released from its mortal connexion, and appear before the Throne of Mercy, to account for its performance of the trust reposed in it, and will be rewarded proportionably to its deserts, with everlasting bliss, or adequately punished for wilful transgressions . J The striking coincidence between the grand features of the two doctrines, is conclusive evidence of the truth, of Kant's deli neation of the human mind', and would be the more extraordinary, were they not both the result of pure reason — were they not both grounded on the same luminous view of the mortal body, and the immortal soul— did they not both portray two kinds of mental laws, adjusted by the allwise Creator, to direct our physical and moral actions ; and did they not both distinctly show that through the me dium of conscience, or the " holy spiritwithin us," wehave the oppor tunity of appealing to, and communing with, our Heavenly Father. 158 When we need moral advice, and alleviation of mind, we have but to search inwardly, into the very recesses of the soul, for that honest determination of our will, whichis never withheld when we disburthen our minds of sensual thoughts, and ask reverentially for that moral power that enables us to bear up, with fortitude, against the ills of life; — which commands us to abstain from black ingra titude, and from sinful courses ; — that enables us to support pros perity with meekness, and moderation, and to attend to the moral and .physical comforts and benefits of otir families and neighbours. That moral power, which instils into our minds rectitude of conduct, and which, moreover, determines our opinions with regard to our ordinary, moral, and religious behaviour, manifests the necessity of repentance for sin, and leads to a purer, course of life; — toa life devoted to virtue and charity, in the hope of forgiveness and everlasting happiness. The coincidence may be carried still further, for, both the doc trines tend to enjoin a dependance on God, teach us to believe in the immortality of the soul, and that the deserving or morally good will be rewarded hereafter, and the wicked doomed to expiate their crimes by proportionate sufferings ; and further, they both picture the two distinct natures in man, on which are grounded the good and evil principles ; — the resurrection or ascension of the spiritual soul (St. Paul's "spiritual body,") to the kingdom of Heaven ; and the return of the mortal body to earth ; for, " flesh is flesh," and "spirit is spirit." To conceive them intermixed, or one becoming pure like the other, or free from its earthy nature, involves contradiction and absurdity, outrages the laws of God, which control physical effects, and is in direct opposition to the positive teaching of Jesus Christ, who, when addressing his diciples, said, " What ! and if ye shall (mentally) see the Son of Man ascend up where he was before ? It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing," (John, c. vi. 62, 63 ;): meaning, no doubt, that his divine spirit would be freed from its mystical connexion with mortality, and ascend to his Father's kingdom ; and that his mortal body would return to earth. Both doctrines likewise tend to teach us our duty to God, and to our neighbour, and to live in charity with all men. 159 In support of these deductions which result from the study of human nature, grounded on Kant's exposition of the great faculties of the mind ; (sense, understanding and reason) ; we may appeal to the doctrines of Christ and his Apostles. Christ charged his followers in these words ; — " Fear not them that kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul : but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body." (Matt. c. x. 28.) It is evident from this text that the soul and the body are declared by Jesus Christ himself, to be in two different states; — the body in that in which man has power, and the soul in another, in which he has no power ; but in which the essential man, (or the immortal soul,) will continue to exist, or rather live for ever, retain consciousness of the past, and be rewarded by a mer ciful God, for all the privations his human nature has endured in this world, from an adherence to the moral duties, and for the virtuous course of life he may have pursued : this text likewise implies, that he (the soul, or essential man,) will be punished hereafter for wilful omissions, and for suffering a sinful course of life, during its alliance with mortality. Christ and his Apostles taught mankind that we could not have existed, but by the will of our Heavenly Father ; and tfiat moral duties were required of us ; for we were endued with a rational soul — with the ''spirit," or "breath of God;" — they taught us also, the utter impossibility of freeing ourselves from accountability in a future state, for the good or evil deeds of human nature ; because the Almighty implanted in us moral and physical laws snitable to our two natures, including the divine faculty of reason, to direct our steps in this probationary sphere. If, with the aid of this internal light, we neglect to control the impulses of the flesh, and to uphold the dictates of conscience, or of the " spirit," by a due exercise of the moral law within us, but suffer the mere physical laws of our nature to bear sway, and lead us on to vice, the responsibility rests with the essential man, (St. Paul's "spiritual body,") which must answer for SHch turpitude before a righteous God at the judgment-day. 160 St. Paul thoroughly understood the laws of the human mind ; he says, " I find then a law, that when I would do good, evil is present with me ; for I delight in the law of God after the inward man ,• but I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, (the moral law,) and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin, (the physical law,) which is in my members. With the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh, the law of sin." (Rom. c. vii ; 21, 22, 23, 25.) St. Paul felt the conflict of his two natures, and knew that each was governed by its own law, he clearly perceived, on mature reflection, the loveliness and power of the pure moral or spiritual law, the basis of accountability in man ; and he contemplated it as the " law ef God," from its absolute purity; consequently, it could not be within the impure limit of time, but a property of the essential man. The confession that, with the rational portion of the mind, he served the law of God ; and with the sensual portion, or the flesh, the law of sin, must warrant the conclusion that St. Paul was thoroughly acquainted with the two distinct natures inherent in man — the moral and the physical ; also, the two distinct kinds of laws that governed them ; namely, the physical and the moral laws. In another place he says, " who art thou that judgest another man's servant? to his own master he standeth or falleth;" and then he declares, "that every one of us shall give an account of himself to God." (Rom. c. xiv ; 4, 12.) This is high authority for the doctrine of accountability in another world. The Apostle, moreover, informs us, " that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption." (1st Cor. chap, xv; 50.) Implying that it is not that mortal or corrupt body, which must necessarily terminate its human existence in death, and return to earth ; but our accountable, or " spiritual body," the essential man, or immortal soul, that " shall be raised incorruptible ;" that is, shall appear at the throne of mercy, when released from its mortal connexion, " and give an account of ' himself to God ;" for corruption and incorruption are incompatible 161 with each other, and cannot exist in the same medium ; they are so dissimilar, that they cannot exchange states, one can never become the other. Corruption, implies decay, which is a state or condition inci dental to all matter, and only applicable to substances within time, which are transient and propelled (by the unbending laws of physics) to their end, and become decomposed ; in other words, a change ensues. Incorruption is a metaphysical notion, or an infinite, or abso lute idea of reason, only applicable to God's Kingdom, where pure or incorruptible spirit can alone exist. Alluding to the resurrection of the dead, in order to impress the doctrine on his converts, St. Paul says, "this coruptible must • put on incorruption, and this mortal must pu? on immortality." Were we to interpret this text literally, that is, conclude that our corrupt body would be clothed with incorruption, and that both corruption and incorruption would be raised together into God's pure mansion : we should not only be guilty of great absurdity, but directly oppose the sublime teaching of St. Paul, and miscon ceive the true spirit of Christianity. The language here quoted is such as he thought would impress on his unenlightened hearers, the great change that takes place at death; which he illustrated in various forms, to render his meaning intelligible. Very precise language is usually dispensed with, when we address those who are acquainted with our subject, and scientific language would be useless, when addressed to the uninformed ; custom even permits the use of a figurative style of speech, to supersede, more precise or definite expressions. St. Paul, in answer to the questions, " How are the dead raised up ? With what body do they come ?" said, " God giveth it a body as it hath pleased him. It is sown a natural body," (dissolved in death, or the mortal body hath ceased to be animated with human life,) " it is raised a spiritual body," (the soul, or essential man, having risen, or ascended to God's kingdom.") " There is a natural body," (the mortal) and there is a spiritual body," (the essential man, or divine soul.) St. Paul studiously 162 avoids entering into any definition of the mystical nature of the " spiritual body," which has been associated with, or is in connex ion with the mortal body ; his view of the Resurrection is purely spi ritual, grounded on sound conclusions of reason. He appears to have felt confident, that matter, or physical substances, which are of a corrupt nature, and within time, (time being the repository ; of sensible objects,) could not be admissible into the eternal mansion of God. St. Paul further says, " The dead (meaning the souls of the dead) shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed." Then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, " Death is swallowed up in victory ^ O, Death, where is thy sting ? O, • Grave, where is thy victory ? for the sting of Death is Sin." When the great change takes place, the human, will merge into the immortal, or spiritual, which state, being beyond the limit of time, isrindefinable ; therefore, we can only say with St. Paul, that the "spiritual body" will be such as pleaseth the Lord of Hosts — no. doubt suitable to its new state. The language of St. Paul implies, that we (hmnan beings) shall die as physical or mortal men ; but that the active moral principle, the soul or essential man, in connexion with, and ope rating on the physical man, in this material world, shall subsist for ever in a purely spiritual world — in God's kingdom. The vic tory is achieved when death hath cut the thread of human life, for then the " spiritual body," or the essential man, has ascended free, to the pure realms of bliss. St. Paul, when addressing his unenlightened converts, calls the resurrection from the dead a mystery, for, he says, " Be hold, I show you a mystery ; we shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump ; for the trumpet shall sound, and the (souls of the) dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed." (1 Cor. c. xv, 35, &c.) That this description of the resurrection of the dead was con sidered a mystery by his converts, we cannot doubt. I appre hend by the sentence, " We shall not all sleep/' St. Paul meant 163 to imply, not the whole of man (which comprehends soul and body), but that the mortal body only, shall sleep in death, that is., die, or return to its native element; our soul (the essential man), which Christ says cannot be killed, cannot, of course, die or sleep in death, but must retain its consciousness, and at the moment dissolution takes place here, it will appear at the throne of grace, at the judgment seat of God. That we shall all be changed is most certain ; for, when the breath of life quits our mortal body, which must' be " in the twinkling of an eye," triune man is no more, the necessary and active connexion or communion of the " two natures" are then severed by death; the essential or " inward man," the soul, or St. Paul's spiritual body is released from its earthly trust, and as a spirit, soars incorruptible ; and the mortal or corrupt body being dead, is no longer a part of human nature. This will be a change indeed. By the emphatic expression of Christ, " kill the body," he doubtless contemplated no other change of the mortal body after death, than its return to dust ; and that the soul released from its mystical connexion with mortality, would continue to exist, and be at God's mercy. Whether the expression, " last trump," is used figuratively, to denote the coming of each soul to its blissful state, on being freed from its mortal restraint, or the coming of a congregation of souls at a distant period ; or the coming of the souls of all mankind at the end of the world, may admit of a doubt with many, but for myself I entertain no such doubt. The word " last " applies emphatically to each soul ; for St. Paul did not contemplate the resurrection, or ascension, of any other body, than the " spiritual body," or soul. I therefore feel confident, that the words, " last trump," imply the great change that each undergoes at the moment of death ; when, " in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump, (the souls of) the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed ; for it must necessarily be the last signal or effort of human nature in each individual at the moment of death. The language of St. Paul evidently implies, that the whole 164 proceeding, or great change, will take place at the instant of deaf b f and he concludes with recommending his converts to be " stead fast, immoveable, always abounding in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know that your labour is not in vain in the Lord — " thus enforcing the firm belief, that by the fulfilment of their religious and moral duties in this sublunary state, they will ensure to themselves (meaning to their immortal souls) eternal happiness in another and better world* Jesus Christ and his Apostles have solved that great and most interesting question which has engaged the serious contem plations of the propounders and ministers of all religions, namely ; What will become of us (the essential man) after the ter mination of this mortal life ? They taught us to lead a virtuous life, to put our trust in God, and to believe in the resurrection of the dead, or the rise or ascent of the essential man, or "spiritual body" to God's kingdom, to life everlasting. They did not define the mystical con nexion between matter and the spiritual or reasoning mind ; or be tween soul and body ; but stated it to be a mystery, that is, be yond the reach of the knowing faculty of man. We should re quire other faculties, other powers of mind, to enable us to know more than we at present can know, of immortality ; or in other words — of life everlasting. It is in vain to attempt to explore or unfold this mystery ; we cannot arrive at.any positive knowledge ; we are finite beings. All created matter is endued with faculties and properties suited to its end, or to the will of omnipotence, in the grand scale of creation ; in which the globe of the earth can only be contemplated as an insignificant material atom, when compared with the immensity of creation ; but even this comparison falls into nothing, when we further attempt a comparison with an infinite God. All created matter progresses lo a change, in that peculiar mode: which it has pleased the Almighty to pre-ordain ; therefore, is dependant on, and in connexion with, an intelligent Creator, whose designs, and modes of operation, are inscrutable. Speculations, on matters beyond the reach of our senses, must 165 be misplaced, if not absurd. All speculations as to the probable state of the inhabitants of other planets, the state of the de parted, the modes of existence of angels and spirits, the enjoy ments, and the society, of purely spiritual existences in heaven, are matters which God, in his infinite goodness, has withheld from us, for such information would be unsuitable to us as sinful mortals ; —we can only know these things, when " this mortal shall put on, or be replaced by, immortality." These speculations differ widely from the holy or spiritual conclusions of practical rea<- son, which are incontrovertible, and the ground-work of Chris tianity. The latter are purely metaphysical, and are unconnected even in thought, with matter, for we cannot conceive them limited, or reasonably suppose that they had a beginning, or can have tin end. For example; the Omniscient Creator, the divine soul or spirit in communion with our mortal body, perfect virtue, truth, and justice, &c. Such 'pure, or spiritual ideas, can only be contemplated by the rational mind. To be enabled to form these metaphysical conclusions, to be enabled to.entertain thoughts so sublime, so opposite to the phy sical properties and operations of matter, (whicn are all cause and effect, action and re-action, &c, and succeed each other in time,) the Reasoning principle in man, or the reasoning mind must be spiritual, it cannot be matter ; both -science and common sense oppose s«ch a ^conclusion . Upon a careful perusal of the fore going pages, we shall be compelled to admit, in conformity with the Christian, doctrine, that we (human beings) possess a spiritual natvre, and are accountable beings; moreover, that the spiritual nature {soul of man), the never-dying principle, continues its consciousness and lives for ever in its immortal state, as finally- doomed bv the judgment of God. And that the resurrection of the dead is a release of the spiritual body from its mortal connexion, and may be considered .figuratively, a flight, or unshackled ascent, to eternity : thus death cannot annihilate the spiritual principle, which still subsists, free from the entanglement of the physical man, — this is the never-dying principle, this, it is, that readers Man immortal. x 166 Previously to a scrupulous investigation of this momentous question, " What will become of us. (the essential man) after the termination of this mortal lifb?" — Let us prepare our minds for the inquiry, by a few reflections on the truth and con sistency of those authorities on which we most rely for accurate information . We cannot peruse the Holy Scriptures profitably, unless we distinctly view man in his triune state, for, it is evident, the Apostles constantly kept this idea distinctly before thein minds. When man is alluded to, as being accountable for his moral con duct, or as seeing God in his own likeness ; it is the divine soul, or essential man that is contemplated, the earthly body is not even alluded to : besides, figurative language is very generally resorted. to, to elucidate a subject, in preference to strict formal language. For example : when speaking of the moral nature, or essential man, we frequently allude to material objects, such as the heart, and breast ; still, it is perfectly understood, that when we say, a man has a good heart, we do not mean his heart of " flesh and blood," but the disposition of his reasoning mind, prompted by the " spirit" within him, to the performance of good actions. This distinction might easily be misconceived from a literal translation of the figurative language of the Scriptures, and thus, the loveliness of the moral or spiritual law within us, (St. Paul's " Law of God,") might be perverted into the mate rial notion of a human heart. It is most desirable that the science oi moral philosophy, or philosophy of mind; should be deeply studied, for, without some knowledge of it, we cannot perceive the loveliness, or enjoy the sublimity of Christ's doctrine; but, on the contrary, may be very liable to misinterpret it. Figures of speech must be carefully interpreted, for their exact meaning may be misunderstood at this distant period. Great caution must therefore be exercised, before we finally interpret the mean ing of texts in such a manner, as may seem opposed to that divine regularity, and systematic order, observable in the works of God. We should recollect, that to the present day, the eastern nations indulge in figurative language, and that our sacred books, which 167 were obtained from the east, abound with that kind*6f imagery, so prevalent there even at this day,' It is most desirable, that we should entertain correct opinions on matters relating to the Scriptures— of the times in which the Apostles lived, the countries they visited, the manners and customs of the people, and the religions which then prevailed ; also, the state 6f mind, and peculiar prejudices of the people whom the Apostles addressed, and their views in addressing them. It should also be remarked, that few persons of consider ation were among their immediate followers, and that their early proceedings were little known to the authorities at Rome, who then governed so large a portion of the civilized world. At one period, the Apostles endeavoured to overturn the prejudices, and change the habits of the Jews ; at another, those*6f the Gentiles ; whose former faith, or mode of worship, was so exceedingly ido latrous, gross, and absurd, that St. Paul cautioned them against mistaking him, Apollos, or Cephas, for their Saviour; saying, we preach "Christ crucified." (1 Cor. c. i. 12 and 23.) The age of ignorance has, let ns hope, passed away, and this consideration has imposed on us the duty of judging and deciding for ourselves, on matters of conscience, after mature meditation, and converse with those who are competent to enlighten our minds, to clear up our doubts, and to direct us in the paths of duty towards God and man. The investigation of the question, " What will become or us (the essential man) after the termination of this mortal life ?" necessarily fixes our meditations on the doctrine of the resurrection of the body. This examination will draw our attention to the very prevalent opinion, that the mortal body will be judged by Jesus Christ on earth, on the supposed day of Resurrection, or at the last day, when time will be no more. Then it is very genei-ally believed, that the earthy particles of the bodies of all mankind that have led a virtuous life (from the creation of man) will be individually collected together, and raised pure or incorruptible ; that is, will be changed to a pure some thing, and be again associated with the spiritual soul,, the essential 168 man, and thus form one celestial being, in co-operation with that soul that had been received into God's kingdom at the dissolution of triune man; consequently, which had already been judged worthy of eternal happiness. It is likewise believed by many that the earthy particles of tl«e bodies of wicked men, -(from the creation of man,) will be col lected together, individually, and will become a something very different from physical matter, and will be judged by Christ on earth, and be doomed to suffer everlasting torments in hell ; in association with the spiritual soul, or essential man, that had appeared before the judgment-seat of God, to account for the deeds of the flesh, at the dissolution of triune man ; which souls, I apprehend, must have been judged, and separated from the good souls, and set apart for punishment; — conscious of their unwor thiness, and expecting the resurrection oi their regenerated mor tal bodies, to accompany them to their everlasting abode of wretchedness and torment. Duly appreciating the spiritual doctrine of Jesus Christ and his Apostles, we must make allowances for the above prevalent belief of the literal resurrection of the- body, which has arisen from misconceiving particular texts, and not viewing Christianity as a beautiful whole ; besides, the material feeling that pervaded man kind two centuries ago, when the Scriptures were translated, may have tended to materialize and distort many of the spiritual ideas contained in the original writings that were not otherwise decidedly marked. Christ's answer to the Sadducees, fully confirms the opinion that our gross animal body cannot enter the pure mansion of God. " For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as angels of God in Heaven." (Matt. c. xxii. 30.) In this emphatic answer, our Saviour most assuredly con templated the spiritual body, or soul, (the essential man), ; for St. Paul says we have two bodies, " a natural body ," of the nature of earth; and a " spiritual body," oi the nature of God. (1 Cor. c. xv. 44.) What can induce us to believe that these two bodies are again to be united, or associated together in another 169 world — in God's spiritual kingdom ? — Why not rather believe! that the earthly, having returned to dust, as God decreed, in compli ance with the laws of nature, or the beautiful order of God's works,is thus dead to futurity, or incompatible with a spiritual life in another world ; and that the spiritual body only, will be released from its mortal incumbrance, and ascend " incorruptible," and enjoy life everlasting ? — Why believe it requisite that the ctirrupt earthy particles need be changed to a pure something, when that belief outrages primitive Christianity, modern science, and com mon sense ? — Is not the great change that takes place at death, or at our departure from human life, as taught by St. Paul, all- sufficient ? I fear that either the writings of the Apostles' have been mis understood by translators, which may have lea to the erroneous opinion of the resurrection of the mortal body ; or that the Apos tles, fully aware that human beings comprised soul and body, did not always express themselves with sufficient precision, for the dull and material notions that have pervaded mankind in later ages. When alluding to man, (essential man,) they always enter tained a spiritual notion or idea, which could not always be literally expressed or defined in mere words ; consequently, the temporal heads of the church may have misunderstood the text, when they preached the resurrection of the material body at the last day — an incongruity not admissible in this enlightened age. Animal matter is ever undergoing change, wliich, according to the laws of the mind, cannot be admissible or accountable in Heaven ; therefore, there can be little doubt, but, that this belief has taken root in error; it is not supported by the teaching of Christ and his Apostles, when correctly interpreted and taken as a whole : the system of interpreting each text literally, which has been so frequently pursued by commentators, must introduce error and absurdity. Christianity, as before observed, is a beautiful whole, lovely in its simplicity ! Detached texts, figures of speech, parables, allegories, allusions, and the .various modes of expression used by Jesus Christ and his Apostles, to impress the minds of an unenlightened people with his divine religion. 170 surely cannot be denominated the essential doctrine of christisnity , but the peculiar means used to propagate it ; therefore, these texts must not be mistaken for Christianity itself. My best endeavours shall be exerted on another occasion, to define Christianity, which is a pure moral and spiritual enactment, the harbinger of peace and heavenly joys ; which must be viewed in its true light to be clearly understood. Man being created with two natures, or two bodies, the physi cal or natural, and the moral or spiritual ; why should not the spi ritual, which is the accountable, be the all-sufficient body to be raised, or in other words, that is to soar disencumbered, and to be judged immediately ? Besides, we believe in the communion of saints in heaven ; — that the souls of holy men, who have served the cause of religion and morality on earth, are now the associates of Christ in heaven. Can we believe that their " spiritual bodies" are raised and communing with God, previously to the resurrection and final judgment ; — impossible ! they, (the essential man, ) must have passed the ordeal of the last judgment, at the dissolution of triune man, in death, as St. Paul taught his followers; nor can we believe, without gross absurdity, that their mortal bodies will be raised pure at what is termed the last day, and be judged by Christ, on earth, and associated again with their spiritual bodies. Can these holy men be effective members of God's kingdom, and yet require the further addition of a regenerated carnal body to make their efficiency more than complete ? The following declaration of Jesus Christ, fully confirms the foregoing conclusions. "As touching the Resurrection of ths dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying, 1 am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob! God is not the God of the dead, but of the living." (Matt. c. xxii. 31 and 32.) It would be in direct contra diction to the true spirit of the scriptures, to suppose for an instant, that Christ alluded to the earthly bodies of the patriarchs, when he said, " Not the God of the dead, but of the living." He could not mean their mortal bodies, which he distinctly taught us were within the power of man, and could be killed, or deprived of 171 their sentient nature ; but their pure souls, which are their spiri tual bodies, and not sensible objects — not within time ; con sequently, not susceptible of being killed or destroyed by man ; but which would be at God's mercy, and enjoy everlasting life in his eternal mansion ; which could not be said of gross matter. Moreover, if it be admitted that the day of resurrection on earth, the last day, or the day of judgment, must intervene before the corrupt bodies could be raised pure ; neither the resurrection ot the patriarchs, nor of the saints, can hitherto have taken place ; which opinion would still more derange the beautiful symmetry- of the primitive christian church ; for could they commune with God before the last day — the day of judgment ? Besides, the asser tion of St. John, in the text below, warrants the conclusion, that our spiritual souls, (the essential man,) shall see tjbe divine person of Christ in heaven, and that we shall be pure like him, or free from any earthy particles. " We know that when he, (the God head of Christ,) shall appear (in his heavenly glory), we, (the essential man,) shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is," (in the brightness of God's glory.) (1st John, c. iii. 2). In this spiritual state, every idea of matter is discarded. Here, we are probationers for eternity. — Earth is the great seminary in which we are to prepare ourselves for heaven. I shall conclude with a few remarks on the nature of our cor rupt or mortal body ; it is derived from the earth, sustained by the earth, and to the earth it will return ;— which position is grounded on numerous texts of scripture, supported by science, and corro borated by sound conclusions of reason, for, being within the limits of mortality, time, it must be finite. ~St. Paul says, " as we, (human beings,) have borne the image of the earthly, we, (the, soul, or essential man,) shall also bear the image of the heavenly." (1st Cor. c. xv. 49.) Implying that triune man no longer exists, or that he ceases to bear the image of the earthly when death, the great change, takes place ; but, that then, we, (the soul or essential man) shall bear the image of the heavenly, in another world, or be in Gods likeness ;-pure !- spiritual ! or divine ! ! 172 The belief that our corrupt or mortal body, will be literally raised purej or incorrupt, after being judged by Christ on earth, at the end of the world, or at the last day — the day of resurrec tion ; and again be associated with our immortal spirit in God's kingdom, I conceive to have arisen from the same cause that has operated to circumscribe our spiritual knowledge ,- — the not fully comprehending our two separate natures, in their distinct states ; ' the abode of the mortal body being in, and suited only, to this world ; and the abode of the soul, or " spiritual body," suitable to another world, to exist eternally. The works of the Almighty, when clearly seen by the eye of the mind, are ever systematical, beautiful, and sublime ! and agree with our ideas of infinite reason. I therefore conclude that St. Paul does not mean that our earthly body is to become hea venly, like unto God, by putting on " incorruption ;" but that we, (human beings,) shall change our vile body," (that is, escape from it by death,) and that we, (the soul, or essential man,) shall " be fashioned like unto his glorious body." (Phill. c. iii. 21.) Mean ing that our immortal soul — the spirit of God — the link that con nects us with eternity, will bear the image of the heavenly, or of the God-head of Christ' God is a spirit, and those who worship him, must worship him in spirit, and in truth ; matter, or material substance, is not even hinted at, or contemplated ; because of its unfitness, or worthlessness, in reference to eternity. Death, and the resurrection, may be viewed or contem plated by the mind, as follows ; — The death oi a human being, is the extinction of human life, not annihilation, or the reducing to nothing (a phrase, the meaning of which we cannot comprehend) ; but a dissolution of triune man. The earthly, or material bodv, in conformity with all objects of nature, undergoes continual change, (it is a condition of that nature,) as all material substances do ; and passes through the gradations of cause and effect, action, and re-action, &c. And the soul, or spiritual body, (the essential man,) — the never-dying principle, which was ever in its immortal state, is released at the moment of death from its mystical opera- 173 tion on mortality, and rises or ascends to the Throne of Grace ; that is, the disincuinbered spirit soars in the illimitable expanse of infinity. This is the resurrection oi the dead; and was so interpreted by Jesus Christ himself, who said, "What! and if ye shall (mentally) see the Son of Man ascend up where he was before ! It is the spirit that quickeneth, the flesh profiteth nothing." (John, c. vi. 62 and 63.) When the death of the physical man takes place, it may be termed everlasting death ; for the mortal body then ceases to be ani mated with human life, or with the spirit, or " spiritual body ;" it becomes a senseless lump of earthy matter, or decomposed ; con sequently can no longer be in connexion with the rational soul, or essential man, who continues his existence — in other words, retains his consciousness, for he has risen, or is released from the mortal body ; death cannot affect the spiritual principle, which subsists free from the entanglement of the physical man. This is the never-dying principle — this it is that renders man immortal. The mystery alluded to by St. Paul, Kant's Moral Philo sophy partly unveils, by exhibiting, to our mental view, the immortal soul of man, (the noumenon,) distinct from the mortal body. The mystery comprehends the connexion between mor tality and immortality — between the earthly body and the spiri tual soul — between God and man. To hazard an opinion ; The glorious result to be derived from the working of corruption, under the mystical influence of incor ruption, as tending towards perfection in holiness, may be the great end in view, iu the creation of man. The great and pious Addison observes, " It must be a pros pect pleasing to God himself, to see his creation for ever-beau tifying in his eyes, and drawing nearer to him, by greater degrees of resemblance." (Spectator, No. 11.) It is imperative on me, although it involves frequent repeti tions, to satisfy the mind of the reader, that the elucidations of the christian doctrines, advanced in this work, are, when " spi- 174 ritually discerned," in accordance with the scriptures : and with the divine teaching of Jesus Christ and his Apostles. It will appear that our two natures are not only distinct, but that the basis of the one, is so very dissimilar, when compared with that of the other, that they can never be combined, or become one; there is a repugnancy in their' very natures 5 nevertheless, the trinity in unity is apparent in human nature, or in triune man. These two natures are infinitely more opposite than earth and air, the component physical properties of our animal nature ; which are both within the limit of time. The body is of the nature of earth — corrupt, and limited to this mortal sphere; the immortal soul is of a spiritual nature — incorrapt, not limited to time, but ever in its infinite state. One belongs to the earth, the other to the kingdom of heaven, where it will account for the deeds done in the body. It is stated in the book of Genesis, that " the Lord formed man, (his animal nature,) oi the dust of the ground,) and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, (his divine spirit,) and man be came a living soul," or, human being; (Gen. c. ii. 7.) by the divine, but mysterious connexion or influence of what is literally termed the breath of God — the immortal soul, — with the earthly body. And the Lord said, " In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; -for out of it wast thou taken : for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return." (Gen. c. iii. 19.) This alludes to the mortal body; certainly not to the breath of God, (the soul,) which emanated direct from God ; therefore, could not betaken from the ground, or from mere matter! — the material portion of man could not be that breath, or " spiritual body," which St. Paul assures us will return or ascend to God, from whence it came ; consequently, is not sws- ceptible of amalgamation with the physical properties of the carnal body, or of perduring in time. St. Paul corroborates this doctrine, and distinctly asserts that our two natures, (body and soul), are ever in two distinct states, the mortal and the immortal; for he says,'" we, (the essential man,) are confident, I say, and willing rather to be absent from the (mortal) body, and to be present with the Lord." That is, 175 willing to dissolve the mystical connexion between the spirit and the mortal body, by death ; that our souls may be present with God. " For we, (the soul, or essential man,) must appear before the judgment-seat of Christ (in heaven,) that the soul of every one may receive, (or be rewarded for,) the things done in his body, (human nature,) according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad." (2d Cor. c. v. 8, 10.)— Thus, the essential man continues his consciousness in a future state. Let us now exclusively devote our most serious attention to the divine and mortal natures of our Lord Jesus Christ, the great author and founder oi pure Christianity ,¦ and carefully inves tigate these two natures, by a close examination of the best authorities within our reach. The divinity which shone on the human race, through the medium of his mortality, although in mystical connexion, or asso ciation with, his earthly nature, was not of this sinful world — (Was not Within time-, which is the mere repository of sensible objects ; it is ever in its immortal state — in eternity. His mortal body only, was within time, where man has power ; which was proved by the merciless tyranny and cruel persecution, even unto death,, rf the man, Jesus ; — the mediator between God and man; who,, by means of the " Holy Ghost," or holy spirit, operating on man kind, through his 'divine humanity, founded pure Christianity ; — Jthat spiritual religion , which inculcates love, "Charity, audfojv giveness ; teaches us1 our duty towards God, as well as towards ©ur neighbour $ aad opens to us the glorious prospect of blissful immortality. Jestts Christ himself constantly kept in view, his two distinct natures, and well knew, that they were' in two different states ; that the mortal was within the power of man, and thathis divine nature was in close communion -with his heavenly Father; and, moreover, that the " Holy Spirit," the divine agency between mortality and immortality, or between heaven and earth, was directing his divine humanity, to ameliorate the condition of man. When con templating his divine soul, he says, " he that hath :sent me is with me, the Father hath not left me alone." (John, c. viii. 29.) [76 "I and my Father are one." (John, c. x. 30.) " Believes* thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me," (John, c. xiv. 10.) ; implying that the divinity, (his soul, or God head,) was the same essence with the Father, manifested in a peculiar mode ; and, probably, the only mode in which he could operate on the minds of men, to their moral improvement, and thus generate a rational belief in their future destiny. When contemplating his mortal state, or physical nature, " for he was in alj things like unto his brethren ;" he says, " the Son of Man hath not where to lay his head." (Matt. c. viii. 10.) " And he said unto them, why calleth thou me (the mortal man) good ? — there is none good but one, that is, God." (Matt. c. xix. 17.) Again, " behold, we go up to Jerusalem ; andthe&'on ef Man shall be betrayed unto the chief priests, and unto the scribes, and they shall condemn him to death." (Matt. c. xx. 18.) The mere physical state or nature of Jesus Christ, was thus subject to death, and he required earthly sustenance, and the ordinary conveniences of human life, for he endured the shackles of mortality ; it would be preposterous to suppose for an instant, that he contemplated his mortal body otherwise than as St. Paul has described it, " in all things like unto his brethren ;" he does not confound it with his divine soul, or God-head, which could not be put to death, nor amalgamated with the flesh ; therefore, we must constantly keep these views of his two natures in remem brance, when we devoutly peruse the New Testament. When on the cross, it was his mortal body that suffered, his divinity was not within the power of man, consequently unassailable. On reference to the teaching of St. Paul, when he was most active in the work of moral regeneration, and in establishing and cementing the church of Christ on earth, we shall find, that al luding to the divine soul, or Godhead oi Jesus Christ, he says, " he is the brightness of God's glory, and the express image of his person ; aDd that his mortal body, (or physical nature,) being of the seed of Abraham, was in all things like unto his brethren." (Heb. c. i. 3. ; c. ii. 16 and 17.) And to the Romans he said, " he was of the seed of David, according to the flesh, (his 177 mortal portion,) and Son of God, with power according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dead." (Rom. c. i. 3, and 4.) Thus decidedly teaching, that the spiritual or divine nature, and the mortal nature, even in Jesus Christ, were in mystical connexion, but most certainly in their essence so very opposite and distinct, that we cannot, with the least degree of propriety, consider the spiritual or moral nature ever to have been within the limits of our mortal state, time and space. We will now compare the view previously taken of Jesus Christ considered as God and man, with that entertained by St. Atha nasius, one of the most distinguished fathers of the Christian church, whose opinions are embodied in the Creed bearing his name ; but I suspect, that the pure spiritual view of the two natures of Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Trihity, which St. Athanasius publicly preached, are not clearly explained in that Creed, as it is now presented to us. On a careful examination of this Creed, which more fully enters into the essential natures of Jesus Christ as God and man than any other portion of our church service, we shall comprehend the principal features of the doc trine of the Holy Trinity as therein expounded, which will tend to clear up in our minds, the distinct, and separate stations, occu pied by the mortal and divine natures in Jesus Christ, consi dered as God and man. According to the Christian church, we worship one God in Trinity, and a Trinity in Unity ! Herein I contemplate the mortal body of Christ, " which was of the seed of Abraham," and " in all things like unto his brethren" in mystical connexion with the Divinity, or God the Father." Now, the divinity of Jesus Christ in mystical connexion, or association, with his mortal nature, being of the nature of God; Christ is essentially the Son of God, or " God the Son." In other words, his divine humanity was the medium, through which God's pure spirit ex panded within the mind of man ; for the divinity in Christ, not possessing physical properties, could not be within the impure limit of time, the stamp or character of which is sensible duration. The divinity could not have communicated directly with mankind, 178 except through such a medium as was suited to our limited facul ties ; and experience has not demonstrated that any other portion of physical nature than the human, is susceptible of that.dwrae spirit i which shone on the human race, through the Mediation of our Lord JesVs Christ. Froiih the absolutely necessary spiritual influence, or commu nion, between Jesus ChrUt inhis humanity, and the Almighty ; or between mortality and immortality, proceedeth the Holy Spirit} or " God the Holy Ghost." The divine spirit, or will, of God the Father, shone on the human race through the medium of God in Christ, or God the Son y and the necessary divine spiritual influence, in active communion be tween Jesus Christ and his heavenly Father, is God the Holy It must be self-evident to the studious inquifrer^ that the divine spirit, however infused into man, can be no other than the influence of the OMNiPOTENT-^the only God; for we cannot con ceive more than one supreme, or omnipotent power — the idea is illimitable, therefore cannot be circumscribed, or admit of division. As the divine spirit necessarily partakes of the essence of the Deity, it must wholly centre in him, the omnipotent , or supreme in heaven j it cannot be conceived within -time, where everything has a period of duration, a beginning and an end. Reason oannot admit the possibility of the essential spirit of God being divided into separate DeSies.; there can be but one Omni potent God 5 yet this ^spirit must necessarily influence or direct all the works of the Almighty, in the modes manifested by infinite wisdom; and we must conclude, that his divine spirit) the Word, or the will, which we have designated Noumenon, is in mystical connexion with, or influencing, all physical matter. The harmony observable throughout the creation, would not be conceivable, -with out the belief in a supreme intelligent author of nature, an Omni potent God, directing his works. St. Paul must have felt assured of this truth, when he said, " In him we live, and move, and have Oar being." {Acts, c. xvii, 28*) In consequence of this mystics! connexion, we, as human 179 beings, worship One God in Trtnity, and a Tnmnw m Unity; neither confounding the three persons in the Trinity, nor dividing the substance or Godhead, for, although we mentally view them distinct in their operations, we must necessarily refer them to one essence. We contemplate the three persons in the Holy Trinity as follows : — First, the Omnipotent in heaven, " God the Father" Secondly, his divine incarnation, or association with mortality, through the soul of Jesus Christ,