i "I give thefe Books for. the. founding of a. College, "in this Colony" • Y^Lis«WM¥msinrY° • ILUME^KT • BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE Alfred E. Perkins Fund SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES, 1884-1893 i/Ae S&d/u>7/sOri /rf <9//. ci/J? <' ~/'tsr Ar^<* ry/ « . LONDON: EDWARD ARNOLD 8r. C9 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES 1884-1893 BY THE RIGHT HON. SIR JAMES RENNELL RODD, G.C.B. WITH PORTRAIT SECOND IMPRESSION LONDON EDWARD ARNOLD & CO. 1922 [All rights reserved] Printed in Great Britain by Butler & Tanner, Frome and London. PREFACE I have arrived at a time of life when it seems desirable before memory weakens to place on record some of those things which seem worthy of remembrance in a life which has been rich in varied, and perhaps unusual, experiences. I have not only seen history in the making from very advantageous posts of observation, but I have been brought into personal relations with many makers of history them¬ selves and have an ample store of letter-books and of notes written at the moment when events were shaping or when conversations with "certain persons of importance" had just taken place, which it may be best eventually to destroy. On the other hand I have never preserved or taken copies of official documents, nor did I make any notes from them for my diaries. The sources of these reminiscences have been personal observations and conversations, but they owe to official life the special and exceptional opportunity which it has afforded me of contact with the personalities referred to. All that seems to have a permanent value in my diaries and letters, all that may be handed on without breach of confidence, I hope to include in these pages, which will at least have a value for my children. Many of the apprecia¬ tions and judgments which I formed in early years, when I endeavoured in my diaries to keep pace with the issues which came under my experience, have needed revision. To some events I am still too near to see them in then proper perspective. I shall therefore avoid as far as possible passing judgment 011 the actors, and simply set forth the things I have seen and heard with my own eyes and ears as evidence from which those concerned with the story of these times may draw such conclusions as they warrant. vi PREFACE As such a record must inevitably be, to a certain extent, autobiographical, I feel a temptation to begin like Marcus Aurelius with a testimony of gratitude to those from whom I learned important lessons of life. But as such a collective exordium might render me liable to the charge of self-esteem, and suggest the presumption of a claim to have profited by them, it will be safer to refer to such influences in chrono¬ logical sequence. In glancing through what I have written I notice without dissatisfaction that my appreciations of individuals and their actions are for the most part benevo¬ lent. One may estimate the motives and achievements of contemporaries from a generous or from an atrabilious point of view, according to temperament. The sceptic and the iconoclast perhaps appeal to a wider public, but I am not sure that they are really more worthy of credence than the sycophant. My own personal tendency has been, I readily acknowledge, to regard honesty of purpose as the general rule, and not to suspect it until I have had good reason to do so. With the great war an epoch has closed. Many things which seemed permanent by their nature and unassailable have passed away, and the world will need them no more. For more than a quarter of a century before the close of that epoch my business in life was connected with inter¬ national relations. I do not maintain that these were always handled with consummate knowledge or ability, but I do consider that an unnecessary amount of facile and unreflecting criticism has been passed on what is called the old diplomacy, which would gladly welcome the publica¬ tion of its records. In its day a limited number of men who had learned experience in foreign countries and had had every opportunity to study the temperament of other nations, conducted our affairs abroad, and their service, like that of many other public officers in this country, might almost be regarded as an honorary one, inasmuch as, except in the case of '.heads of missions, their salaries were derisory. From my observation during some thirty- PREFACE vii seven years of diplomatic life I should say that on the whole they kept their Governments very well informed, and that the latter had ample material at hand to guide them in their decisions and previsions. Though our diploma¬ tists had little behind them save the remote factor of a powerful fleet, they succeeded in keeping us clear of European war and entanglements for sixty years, and when Great Britain failed to make her influence felt it was not often due to any shortcomings of our representatives abroad. I have repeatedly seen friction avoided by the tact and skill of the professional negotiator in interpreting instructions and waiting upon opportunity. To handle successfully relations with foreign countries, and in our case especially with Latin nations, to know what not to do, and especially when not to do it, requires a special training just as much as navigation or surgery. Whether a new diplomacy dictated largely by the press and negotiations handled by Ministers inevitably in a hurry in forty-eight hour conferences, the necessity for which in moments of emergency I entirely recognize, are likely to lead to better results and a more cordial spirit in inter¬ national relations may be open to doubt. Experience rather leads me to see advantage in a buffer, intermediate between the protagonists with whom ultimate decision lies. In any case in our country the interest in foreign questions is far more general than it used to be and to some extent a new diplomacy must take the place of the old. But I venture to prophesy that the new diplomacy is likely to prove in the long run more costly, more insidious and probably more menacing to a good understanding between the nations. And for this reason. So long as Governments with a definite end in view acted through a skilful accredited agent, his intrigues, if he attempted any, were not difficult for those who knew their business to detect. But the weapon of aggression of the new diplomacy will be a subtle propaganda, a seduction of the organs of publicity often unperceived by its victims, and an elaborate viii PREFACE process of suggestion aimed at misleading the masses which will employ every available weapon of insinuation, falsehood and even simulated sympathy with popular obsessions. There will more than ever be need for the trained observer with experience of the mentality and temperament of other countries. Such weapons of offence will have to be coun¬ tered by a new armour of defence, and to make it effective is likely to prove a costly process. Meanwhile, instead of preparing for the future we have with the end of the great war closed down every centre of activity abroad which was intended to make the spirit and the ideals of the British people better known in other countries. In this first volume of reminiscences I have dealt with events of which I was mainly an observer and in the last two chapters only reach a phase in which circumstances enabled me to pass from observation to action. In one chapter, the seventh, I have departed somewhat from the general scheme of the book in describing experiences of travel in Greece more than thirty years ago. The pleasure of recalling memories which are really of personal interest offered an irresistible temptation. Looking back over what I have written, I am surprised to realize how little after all has seemed of a sufficiently permanent interest to reproduce out of so much that hap¬ pened in a decade of diplomatic life, so much that appeared to us at the moment to be of grave importance. But even this brief retrospect of the old order and of a life which is rapidly passing away may throw some light on tendencies which shaped the course of events towards issues of great moment, so that these when they came to pass did not altogether astonish those who had studied their antecedents. These chapters are, in any case, an inevitable introduction to the subsequent story which I hope to tell of my long service in Egypt under Lord Cromer, in Stockholm and at Rome, where I spent three years as counsellor and eleven as Ambassador, which last included the convulsive period of the great war. CONTENTS Portrait of tee Author. From a sketch by Lady Granby Frontispiece CHAPTER I Early Years ......... 1 My debut in life. Rome in 1865. The Balliol of Jowett. Rhoda Broughton and Ouida. A first season. Letters and Art. James McNeil Whistler at home and in the studio ; Oscar Wilde ; Burne-Jones ; Laura Lyttelton ; Sam Ward ; Marion Crawford and others. Mr. Gladstone and Lowell at Holmbury. Gladstone on Disraeli. Browning. The Foreign Office in 1883. CHAPTER II Berlin, 1884r-1885 ........ 44 Lord Ampthill as Ambassador. His Roman reminiscences. The Crown Prince and Crown Princess at Wildpark. Prince William. Conversations with Lord Ampthill. His illness and death. Sir E. Malet succeeds. His former relations with Bismarck. Social life in Berlin. The division of classes. Mommsen. The revelation of German Colonial ambitions. Angra Pequena. Opinion deliberately misled by Colonial White Book of 1885. Growth of an aggressive policy towards Great Britain. The first African Conference. The delegates. Sir Joseph Crowe. The F.O. under Lord Palmerston. Sir Travers Twiss. H. M. Stanley. Court balls in Berlin. General impressions. CHAPTER III Berlin, 1885-1886 ........ 83 The Ambassador's marriage. Visit to Tennyson. Mr. Glad¬ stone's resignation. Count Herbert Bismarck. Official visit to Anhalt-Dessau and Brunswick. Matthew Arnold at Berlin. Malet and Desbarolles. Lord Wolseley. Bismarck and Napo¬ leon III. George v. Bunsen. Death of Laura Lyttelton. King Ludwig of Bavaria, his death and funeral. Mr. Gladstone, Dr. Dollinger and Lord Acton at Tegernsee. Autumn visitors to Berlin. The Emperor's ninetieth birthday. The Crown Princess and Lesseps. First symptoms of illness of Crown Prince. IX X CONTENTS CHAPTER IV page Berlin, 1887-1888 112 The illness of the Crown Prince. The responsibility for the summons of Sir M. Mackenzie. Baron Holstein. The Souls. Sir W. Richmond. His visit to Bismarck. Germany and Russia ; the visit of the Czar. Lord Randolph Churchill at Berlin. Labouchere. Tracheotomy performed on Crown Prince. Death of Emperor William and succession of Emperor Frederick. Sir M. Mackenzie. Chancellor crisis and Bismarck's attack on Queen Victoria. Campaign against Empress Frederick. Queen Victoria's visit. Death of the Emperor Frederick. The battle of the doctors, and official inspirations of press. Conversations with the Empress Frederick. My appointment to Athens. Gladstone and Lowell. The grave of Keats. Repudiation by Bismarck of Emperor Frederick's diary. Geffcken imprisoned. The Empress confirms its authenticity. My departure from Berlin. Sir Edward Malet. Episode at close of his tenure of Embassy. CHAPTER V Athens, 1888-1889 ........ 163 Jubilee of King George. The Duke of Edinburgh. Sir Edmund Monson. Difficulties raised by the Emperor William over publication of biography of his father. Bismarckian objec¬ tions. The book appears. Visit to Crete. Consul Biliotti and the Turks. The monasteries of Akrotiri. Elpis Melena. Her stories of Garibaldi. John Addington Symonds in Venice. Summer months on Pentelicon. The Bakhmeteffs. The dis¬ appearance of Malcolm Macmillan. Revolution in Crete. Tricoupis and his sister. His dispute with the French Minister. Marriage of Prince Constantino. The Prince and Princess of Wales and the Empress Frederick at Athens. Arrival of German Emperor and Empress. A reminder of the biography. I accompany the Prince of Wales to Egypt. CHAPTER VI Athens, 1889-1890 ........ 189 Visit to Egypt. Departure of Prince Albert Victor for India. Travel in Greece with Empress Frederick. Dorpfeldt and Schliemann. British school. Investigations in medieval Greek history. Pacification of Crete. The refugees in Greece. Chris- todoulaki. To Brindisi with despatches. Visit to birthplace of Horace. Bismarck's resignation. His own account. View taken by Empress Frederick. The Emperor's exposition to Malet. The power of the deputy in Greece. Birth of an heir to Crown Prince. Cruise in Adriatic with Empress Frederick. Question of return to Embassy at Berlin. The Emperor raises no objection, but forgets that he has condoned the biography. CHAPTER VII Greece, 1890-1891 ........ 213 Travels in the interior of Greece. Maina, Laconia, Messenia, Arcadia. The monasteries of Meteora, Santorin, Aetolia. The general elections in Greece. Defeat of Tricoupis. King Goorge. Departure from Atnens. CONTENTS xi CHAPTER VIII page Rome and Paris, 1891-1892 ...... 242 Constantinople. Sofia. Buda-Pesth. Return to England. Mr. Gladstone and the Channel Tunnel. Windsor and Sand- ringham. Unfortunate conclusion of Empress Frederick's visit to Paris. The Embassy at Rome. Marion Crawford at Sorrento. Middleton. John Addington Symonds. Father Hickey at San Clemente. Republican leanings of Leo XIII. Lord Dufferin. Shelley's Grave. Dufferin appointed to Paris. Bourget in Rome. Amenities of Carnival in 1892. Transfer to Paris. The campaign against Dufferin and the sources of inspiration. Episodes of the Autumn. The Uganda Expedi¬ tion. Appointment to Zanzibar and departure from Paris. CHAPTER IX Zanzibar, 1893 ........ 279 Arrival in Zanzibar. Departure of Uganda Expedition. History of Sultanate. Sir John Kirk and German Colonial enterprise. Constitution under British Protectorate. Admin¬ istrative and political duties. The traffic in slaves. British and Foreign missions. Somali outbreak at Kismayu. Visit of Cecil Rhodes. Death of Sultan Ali. Struggle between rival candidates for succession anticipated by nocturnal landing of naval brigade. Proclamation of Sultan Hamed. Detection of an attempt to export slaves under French flag. Visit to Dar-es-Salam. Position of British East Africa Company. CHAPTER X Zanzibar and East Africa, 1893 ..... 314 An unknown Lady Explorer. Witu ; withdrawal of British East Africa Company. Preparations for second Witu Expedi¬ tion. Landing at Lamu. From Mkonumbi to Witu. New Protectorate Flag hoisted. Exchange of correspondence with outlaws. We are attacked on the way to Pumwani. Capture of Pumwani and Jongeni. Death of Raymond Portal. Mea¬ sures for administration of Protectorate and return to Zanzibar. Epidemic of malaria among Naval brigade. Renewal of dis¬ turbances at Kismayu. Count Lovatelli. Reconnaissance in Witu. Ultimate capture of Fumo Omari. Gloomy outlook on mainland. Incapacitated with malaria. Return of Gerald Portal and Colonel Rhodes. Invalided home. The last days of Sir Lloyd Mathews. Death of Gerald Portal. My appointment to Cairo and Mission to Brussels. Mr. Gladstone's resignation. Lord Rosebery Prime Minister. Lord Kimberley at the F.O. Engagement and departure for Cairo. Index .......... 351 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES, 1884—1893 CHAPTER I EARLY YEARS The early years of the average man can offer little that is of interest to other people unless they are treated as a psychological study of the influence of circumstance on character. Such is not my aim, and I shall therefore pass rapidly over a period which was nevertheless intensely interesting to myself. My first recollections are clouded with the depressing gloom of winter fogs in the interminable lengths of Wimpole Street, where I was born in a house which has now been reconstructed. A little higher up on the other side lived my grandmother, a daughter of a famous geographer, Major Rennell, who having begun life as a sailor became a soldier in the East India Company's service, and was Surveyor-General of Bengal at the age of twenty-five. She was to me a rather awe-inspiring old lady who drove in a yellow coach and was a providence on birthdays. But in Victorian days there was a great gulf fixed between grand¬ parents and grandchildren, and grandmothers did not dance. My father's father I only knew from his portrait in an Admiral's uniform with a red ribbon round his neck. The first real landmark in my existence was the announce¬ ment that we were going to travel, after the majestic old lady had died and the family budget had consequently l b 2 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES somewhat expanded. Up to that period when I was nearly six years old my recollections of " people of importance," which form the subject of the greater part of this book, were naturally limited. But Garibaldi had been pointed out to me driving across Cavendish Square with Peard (Garibaldi's Englishman) who was an acquaintance of my father. Thackeray had also impressed himself on my memory, as a benefactor if not as an author, by rushing into a confectioner's shop when he met me in the street and returning with purchases for his small cousin. The illustrious Rennell had when in the service of John Company married a member of that family, which occupies such an important place in Indian annals. And so we travelled for the space of some eighteen months. Of all that I owe to exceptionally thoughtful parents there are few things for which I have more reason to thank them than for that glimpse in early years of a wider world. To know the cities and ways of many men at an age when the mind is full of receptive curiosity cannot fail to have a lasting influence on temperament. I acquired the elements of other languages and was enabled to witness phases of life which have long since passed away, retaining those experiences in a memory which the general monotonous uniformity of childhood's routine might not otherwise have quickened. It was not the Second Empire at its apogee which made the winter of 1864-65 in Paris memorable to me, so much as the bazaars on the boulevards, the Guignol in the Champs Elysees, and the kindly French friends who entertained children at Christmas with unlimited eclairs and other hitherto unknown delightful things. The spring drew us southward through France into Switzerland where travelling was still chiefly accomplished by posting. I have a vivid recollection of the emotion inspired by the mountains, real mountains with snow-covered peaks and dark zones of fir, haunted with the dread of being lost in the pathless woods. We were, my sister and myself, in charge of a Hanoverian EARLY YEARS 3 nursery-governess. She was full of the lore of Nyxes and Cobbolds, who seemed appropriately to belong to that land of waterfall and forest. She would look into the sky at sunset and see in the fantastic forms of evening clouds premonitions of war and the movements of marshalled battalions. I have since come across types which strangely remind me of her in the books of Frensen. A more positive legendary interest was stimulated by stories of Tell and the " Three Men," whose painted effigies still adorned some of the quaint wooden houses round the Lake of Lucerne where we spent a portion of the summer. My mother, who had a family literary tradition, also enter¬ tained me with tales from the history of Rome, to prepare me for a visit to the great city which was our ultimate goal. There were still in those days men wearing a strange dress passing along the highways who were, I was told, pilgrims bound by a vow, on their way to confess their sins to the Pope at Rome. I used to wonder what crimes they had committed which could only be purged by the long and weary march over the great mountains, and ever farther south. Thus early the name of Rome, which lay before us like a city of promise, came to inspire a certain awe. At last the day arrived when we drove from the far end of the Lake of Lucerne into the heart of the mysterious mountains. There was a half-way station in the Gothard Pass, at Andermat, where a night was spent, chill with the early snow, and then the next day we descended by an astounding zigzag road into sunshine and Italy. There has remained with me ever since the impression of that first revelation of the world beyond the mountain pass. I remember crossing a great river, the Po, in a ferry boat to rejoin the train on the further side. Florence and Siena left no abiding memories, but the drive from Siena through the night to Rome was a great adventure, because the wheel of our carriage collapsed and we had to camp by the roadside until another vehicle could be procured. The brigands who stopped the coaches of travellers were not then wholly 4 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES extinct. Throughout the winter of 1865-66 we lived in the Via Condotti. My first recollection of Rome is of a walk with my father down the Corso, through the Piazza Ripresa dei Barberi, which has long ago disappeared, to descend upon the Forum through a maze of narrow streets which climbed the ridge of the Capitol. A comparatively small area had as yet been excavated. The three columns of the temple of Castor with their bases still covered stood up from a grassy level where cattle pastured. We went on through the Arch of Titus to the Colosseum, which was at that time still dedicated as a church. Altar stations surrounded the arena and in the centre was a great crucifix which remained there till after 1870. The vast amphitheatre was still covered with greenery, and creeping plants hung from the broken arches. Ancient castles and roofless abbeys, with the tales that haunted them, had already touched the chord of imagination in my age of wonder, and here was a whole world of ruins to explore. Of the scene as it then appeared the impression is still vivid after fifty years, as it is of the stately coaches of the cardinals, the uniforms of the Swiss halberdiers and of the weird funeral processions. There were only oil-lamps in the streets of what was then a comparatively small city in a vast circuit of walls, enclosing villas, parks and vineyards. Even to-day I can shut my eyes and visualize a familiar scene on the Pincio, where Pius IX would occasionally descend from his gilded carriage to walk in the gardens, where all the people knelt to receive his blessing as he passed, accompanied by a group of purple monsignori, with a few Swiss guards bringing up the rear. Less definitely I remember a great pageant in St. Peter's at Easter time, when the Pope was carried high on men's shoulders through a surging crowd with waving of feather fans and blare of silver trumpets. I have also a joyous memory of the week of Carnival, when the Corso was thronged with masks and allegorical cars, when we threw handfuls of little plaster pellets, called EARLY YEARS 5 confetti, from hospitable balconies upon the people below, till the road was deep in the dust of the powdered missiles. Each day's display concluded with a race of barebacked horses, down the whole length of the Corso from the Piazza del Popolo to the Ripresa dei Barberi near the Palace of Venice, where the wild career of the frightened animals was checked with canvas sheets. The last evening, that of Shrove Tuesday, was doubly memorable, for as twilight fell every window and every balcony was ablaze with little tapers and the fun grew fast and furious in the long illumi¬ nated street. The growth of population and the invasion of elements of rowdiness has long since killed King Carnival, and no one will see that picturesque festival again. It was the city of Story's Roba di Roma, and I am glad to have known it. There was cholera in southern Italy, and on our way to Venice we were subjected to the medieval and quite useless process of disinfection by fumigation, herded in a room with numbers of fellow victims to breathe a choking sulphurous vapour. Venice was still in Austrian occupation, and a white-coated military band played every evening in the Piazza of St. Mark. But with the spring of 1866 came the menace of war—and there was the probability of Italy being involved. Venice was abandoned by the traveller and we went on into the Tyrol. At Botzen, now included as Bolzano in the greater Italy, I remember the marching of regiments, the trains discharging contingents of wounded, and the rumour that Garibaldi was coming across the Alps. These experiences of travel did much to liberate my childhood from the conventions and prejudices which were still strong in the latter half of the Victorian era. The people of 1860 and '70 among whom I was brought up still wore the phylacteries of their caste, and every one was pitied or denounced who did not conform to the traditions of a comfortable squirearchy. Thus early emancipated, I did not enjoy my private school and resented the confine¬ ment and the strictly limited bounds. Life at a public 6 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES school, the old East India College of Haileybury, which had recently changed its character, seemed a pleasant release. And there I passed through that phase which is probably common to all boys of imagination who have not been brought up in an atmosphere of restricted tradition, the phase of beginning to think for oneself, to resent the injustice of the world and the apparent inequality in the distribution of opportunity. A spirit of revolt was encou¬ raged by the enthusiasm which the first discovery of Shelley aroused and by the acquisition of Swinburne's Poems and Ballads, a book which probably few schoolboys possessed in the early 'seventies. There were hardly any time-honoured institutions which I was not ready to denounce in debate, and no scheme of reform which seemed too revolutionary. This was no doubt as it should be. Years afterwards, when I was Minister in Sweden, I heard repeated what King Oscar said to Barrere, who was afterwards my colleague in Rome, and who had perhaps been excusing the extreme opinions of his early years : "A young man, my dear Minister, who has not been a socialist before he is five and twenty shows that he has no heart. But if he continues to be one after five and twenty he shows that he has no head." In any case I was not ostracized for my opinions. School life was rich in warm friendships. But these, unless renewed at college or in professional life, for the most part recede into the background with the parting of the ways. The successes and failures leave no strong mark behind, and " a rarer sort succeeds to these." Real life began for me at Oxford, and here I would record one of many debts of gratitude which I owe to my father, who had selected Balliol for me somewhat against my own desire to go to Cambridge. To have been at Balliol under Jowett at the end of the 'seventies was a privilege which all my contemporaries there, and I think the world in general, have amply recognized. With such men as Green, Nettleship, Bradley, Evelyn Abbott, and Strachan-Davidson EARLY YEARS 7 that ideal type of the scholar-gentleman who afterwards succeeded to the mastership, to preside over the formation and development of intellectual energy, the college stood at that time at the highest point of prestige. Of those who have made their mark in public life, Lord Lansdowne, Lord Loreburn and Mr. Asquith belonged to an older generation. Lord Milner, though a good many years my senior, was still in residence and, with the right instinct of youth we had marked him down as destined for achievement. Lord Midleton was already practising his oratory at the Union. Lord Curzon came up a term or two only after I had joined, as did the late Sir Clinton Dawkins, and with these I formed abiding friendships. Of my own year three others besides myself became Ambassadors ; Cecil Spring-Rice, Arthur Hardinge and Louis Mallet. Lord Grey of Fallodon joined just before I went down, as did the Archbishop of York. The most finished scholar and critic of our time, my old friend J. W. Mackail, was my contemporary, as was the eminent professor of literature W. P. Ker. Among the most distinguished in every walk of life, whether as politi¬ cians, judges, advocates, men of letters, journalists, or dis¬ tinguished civil servants like Sir E. Ruggles Brise and Sir Bernard Mallet, will be found Balliol men of that time. But it was not only in intellectual accomplishment, in the class and prize lists, that the College excelled. During my four years the Balliol Eight was " head of the river " and we had more than our due share of " blues " in the cricket field and on the running path, among whom 'pars magna fuit that athlete unsurpassed, known to us as Billy Grenfell (Lord Desborough) with Savile Crossley (Lord Somerleyton) and Raymond Portal, the well-beloved, who died too early, a pioneer in Uganda, as will be told in a later page. Being a light weight I was retained to steer the Torpid and after¬ wards the Eight, so that my first terms were spent with the rowing set. The characteristic of Balliol in those days was its universa¬ lity. It included men of all sorts and conditions. There 8 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES were the elder sons, then still destined by tradition to play a part in public affairs, who were welcomed by the Master to what he was entitled to consider he had made the best training ground for youth. There were scholars from Glasgow and from the West of England, from that venerable Blundell's school which educated the pioneers of empire in the west country. There were rich men and poor men, many of the latter owing 110 one knew how much to the Master's generosity. There were a few exotics from the far east, and we all appreciated the gentle manners and the kindly heart of the sometime regent of Persia, Nazir el Mulk (Aboul Cassem Khan). We had even some good comrades from France, one of whom had evidently derived his extensive English vocabulary from a study of Sir Walter Scott and Harrison Ainsworth. I remember one day when we had protested at some outrageous statement, he excused himself by explaining that: "I did only say it to make delight for you roaring blades." After the first terms I saw most of Curzon, George Levcson Gower, who went from college to be assistant private secretary to Mr. Glad¬ stone, Leonard Shoobridge, who had the delicate critical sense of appreciation which is rare among our countrymen, W. Radcliffe, whose delightful book on Fishing from the Earliest Times is likely to become a classic, and Eustis Johnston, whose early death cast a gloom upon us all. He was half American by birth and brought a new element of freedom from convention and gaiety into the routine of life. The present Duke of Bedford was much with us, who with Lord Basing and Raymond Portal went from Oxford to the army. Among journalists there was Strachey of the Spectator, the late E. T. Cook, and Sidney Low, with a number of others who have distinguished themselves in letters. Spender of the Westminster belonged to a slightly later generation, as did Anthony Hope Hawkins. Malcolm Macmillan, the son of the famous Scotch publisher, had a touch of eccentric genius. He mysteriously disappeared in 1899 when I was at Athens, murdered, as we believed at EARLY YEARS 9 the time, by Dalmatian shepherds on the summit of the Asiatic Olympus. One day a mutual friend brought to my rooms Oscar Wilde, who, having won the Newdigate, was an object of special regard to me. There was an immediate fascination in the unconventional freedom of his brilliant conversation and his sureness of himself. At Oxford, however, I hardly saw him, as he was many years my senior, and Balliol and Magdalen are rather far apart. During my first years Ruskin was Slade Professor of Art. His influence was then at its highest, and his lectures were filled to over¬ flowing. Of the Oxford personalities outside my own College I saw most of Raper of Trinity. Pater, a weird exotic individuality, I met from time to time, and the Humphry Wards, who had not yet moved to London, made me welcome at their house. Jowett would occasionally invite me to go for a walk with him, and scare me to death by his long silences or his monosyllabic replies, which seemed to petrify all attempts at intimacy. It was only later when I read essays to him that I learned to know him better, and fell under the magic of his personal influence. Even then after dessert in his dining room he could be very formidable with his abrupt criticisms. There was in our quartette of essay readers a young Scotchman who affected a rather florid style, and concluded one of his efforts with this remarkable peroration : " The pheelosophers of ancient Greece were in fact seetuated as it were upon a pendulum, which was for ever swinging between the opposing poles of being and not being." The Master sniffed ominously and then observed : " That's great rubbish about the pendulum, Mr. . Don't write me any more stuff of that kind ! " Rhoda Broughton was at that time living in Holywell, and was much attached to her undergraduate friends. She had a great heart, but a caustic tongue, which often admon¬ ished me not to be " pert." Our old Oxford acquaintance was maintained through later years. She was a very gallant soul, and proud, maintaining herself to the end by her 10 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES clever pen. There is, I think, a touch of autobiography in her very last book, the closing words of which with their moritura te saluto were written only just before her death. We were by no means serious at Balliol. Life was full of interest and incident, and not all of us gave the due proportion of time to the formidable library of books which had to be absorbed for the final test of Greats. Dilettantism is dangerously attractive in early life. With Harold Boulton I started and edited there a little magazine of poetry which eventually produced a rival with perhaps a rather higher standard than the original. We founded an inter-collegiate society where papers were read on theory and practice in art, and some of us drew in a class which the late Sir W. Richmond, as Slade professor, directed at the Taylorian. In my last year we also produced in college the Agamemnon, the first of those classic revivals which have since become popular. It was so much appreciated that we went on tour by request after the end of term to Eton, Harrow and Winchester, and finally to London. W. Bruce (of Balliol) looked magnificently heroic as the King, and F. R. Benson (of New) the moving spirit, after his success as Clytemnestra, decided to devote himself to the stage, which he has done so much to elevate. The Cassandra of Laurence (of Balliol) was a great performance. As leader of the chorus, as well as scene painter, I had to commit to memory nearly all those wonderful lyric strophes, and even now I have not forgotten them. The last long vacation called for desperate expedients, and when the crucial moment came I knew a good deal well, and a good deal only sketchily. Since then I have always deeply regretted that I did not begin earlier to work with method and make my second into a first, in which category only two names were included in December, 1880. Jowett always maintained that fair intelligence and six hours' work all through would secure a first. The little extra effort to become the master and not merely the apprentice would have been invaluable as a discipline in its effect on after life. My own group of friends rather EARLY YEARS 11 gravitated to the seconds than the firsts, though Curzon retrieved the position by obtaining an All Souls fellowship in addition to a number of other academic distinctions. I did my duty to the College, however, by winning the Newdi- gate prize, the subject for which was the congenial one of Sir Walter Raleigh. In the Sheldonian Theatre, where I passed through the ordeal of reading my poem without the customary inter¬ ruptions, I also saw for the first time one who was after¬ wards to be my chief, and a very kind unfailing friend, Lord Dufferin, when he received the honorary degree of the University. It was there also I saw Turgeneff, leonine and magnificent in his crimson gown. He was an occasional guest of Jowett, and to those who knew the master the humour of the following story may appeal. Turgeneff had been speaking of the many religious sects which were constantly forming in Russia, and said he wished he had studied them more from the point of view of human analysis. He had witnessed the uprise of a new religion in a familiar village. A cobbler had gone to Germany and there had become possessed of a Bible, which he had studied and assimilated. Returning to his native place with the new knowledge he became the prophet of a self-evolved creed, based on the literal interpretation of the New Testament. Jowett was interested, and inquired whether there was any value in the teaching thus inspired. "No," replied Tur¬ geneff, " it was all schlim-schlam and vish-vash, what you call Broad Church ! " The college was full of stories of the Master's sayings and doings, and the more memorable of them are probably on record. The one which most appealed to me, as revealing the humorous common-sense with which he could put down the pretensions of the presumptuous, has no doubt been often told. But I do not remember to have seen it in print. An undergraduate who had been reported to him for repeated and contumacious refusal to attend Chapel, was ready with his excuse, which was that after long and 12 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES mature reflection he had been unable to find a God. The interview was at nine in the morning. The Master took out his watch and curtly observed: "You will have to find one by twelve o'clock or to go down." So those glorious years came to an end, and it was time to think of preparing to compete for the diplomatic service, which it was my father's ambition that I should enter. Looking back from far away at those great days of youth and discovery, I see how much I have owed to my friends, who forgave me many things and accepted me in spite of certain characteristics which must have seemed abnormal to the average sturdy barbarian of my own age. I have all my life been conscious of a strong duality of nature and of a struggle between opposing impulses. The desire to take a part in all that was manly and physically healthy contended with a certain tenderness of sentiment which has always made me reluctant to kill. An ambition to free myself from trammels and conventions has continually been at war with an inherent sense of duty and obligation and a reverence for custom and tradition. While leading the normal life of other men I have always been intensely susceptible to the moods of nature. Cloud effects and drifting shadows over a landscape affected me physically, and certain aspects of outward things moved me with an almost uncanny awe. Is there an instinctive pagan temper¬ ament ? Of all the many lands in which I have lived, perhaps Greece has appealed to me most, because there the correlation between nature and myself seemed closest, most appreciable. I have always felt there the sense of some occult power surviving, some almost conscious radiation of the soul of the world, the spirit which the Greek of old, possessed by it, symbolized in the nature gods whose presence he did not so much conceive as feel. The entry to the diplomatic service, which had recently been brought under the rule of competition, required a nomination, which had been originally promised through the agency of Lord Lytton. But I had passed several of EARLY YEARS 13 the Easter vacations with my friend George Leveson Gower in his father's hospitable house at Holmbury and had there made the acquaintance of his uncle, Lord Granville, who was then Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs and who was ready to welcome me to the Foreign Office. But there was no immediate prospect of vacancies, and so after leaving Balliol I spent the winter and spring at Rome. Gerald Portal, with whom I was afterwards to be associated in Africa, was an attache there under Sir Augustus Paget, and I little thought when attending an evening party at the Embassy that I should one day come to preside over it myself for a long series of years. I painted from models, wrote many poems and enjoyed life immensely in the first burst of liberty from educational restraints. During this visit I made the acquaintance of Ouida, whom I also saw later in her villa at Florence. She was then at the height of her popular fame. Though we never actually met again in after years she maintained a desultory correspondence with me, and especially in the grim closing years of her life, which were destined to be, as she said, like those of an old horse, full of misery. Poor Ouida ! She had a passion for beauty in all forms, and a wealth of imagination which allowed her to identify herself with the ideal creatures she incarnated. It was the more pathetic to realize how poorly nature had endowed her, even to the tone of her voice which was harsh and unpleasing. She dressed herself, nevertheless, in those days with an extra¬ vagance which only drew attention to her disadvantages. But she had a big heart and a certain intuition of genius. She was recklessly generous and improvident, and not always discriminating in the causes which she espoused. The books which earned her vogue were those least worth reading. No one ever interpreted more delicately the romance of the Italy of forty years ago than she has done in Pascarel, Signa, Ariadne and In Maremma. For the rest she lived in a world created by her own imagination, not really observed or known, but as she gorgeously would 14 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES have it to be. She had her day and her night, and a very dark night it was. I returned from Italy to revel in a first season. My Oxford intimates had also gravitated to London, where George Leveson Gower was already established at 10 Downing Street, working with another constant friend of the future, Spencer Lyttelton. The discovery of London was absorbing in those irresponsible days. Many of our old landmarks have now disappeared. We used occasion¬ ally to attend, somewhat in a spirit of levity, a well-known institution for public debate in the neighbourhood of Fleet Street, known as Cogers. It was frequented by the clerks and John Gilpins of the neighbourhood and presided over by a venerable grey-bearded citizen, known as the " Vice," who presumably substituted some more illustrious chairman. He used to circulate, printed on little slips of coloured paper, specimens of the wit and wisdom of Lord Beaconsfield. Cogers had rather a conservative character. But just inside old Temple Bar, behind a public house, was the more democratic Temple Discussion Forum, a popular parliament which had the probably quite unjustified reputa¬ tion of having, in the beginning of the century, given occasion to the Great Corsican to denounce the misrepresentations there circulated by British middle-class opinion. One night a group of old Balliol friends, including Curzon, Cecil Spring- Rice, Clinton Dawkins and myself, adjourned after a John¬ sonian banquet at the old Cock Tavern to the Forum, where each of us had engaged himself to make a violent speech in a sense diametrically opposite to his natural political convictions. I cannot now recall the particular subject proposed that evening for discussion, stimulated by whisky hot or cold. But the extreme radical, not to say subversive opinions, eloquently and forcibly advanced by the present Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs so roused the indigna¬ tion of a medical student, that he invited " this pink-cheeked Oxonian " to come out behind the bar, and have his head punched. At this moment Clinton Dawkins, who was an EARLY YEARS 15 accomplished light-weight boxer, diverted the quarrel to himself by the vigour of the personal opinion he expressed of the medical student and all his works. But when we went out to see the fun the challenger had disappeared. Social life was rapidly expanding into wider circles, but the old order still maintained some pride of exclusiveness, and the great houses were not overcrowded. The hardy climber encountered a certain climatic resistance, and there were still things which were not done. There was even a reluctance to admit the propriety of reversing in the ball¬ room, so long as there was still space enough for the swing and movement of the delightful old Strauss waltzes. Hours were much later than to-day, and I grew quite familiar with the aspect of London at dawn on a May or June morning. But from the first the social world of the 'eighties was to me less absorbing than the life of art and letters into which I seemed naturally to drift. Saturday afternoons were spent with Richmond at Hammersmith for tennis and supper with music and riotous conversation and tobacco. Through him I became acquainted with William Morris and in due course with Burne-Jones, the most lovable of men. Wilde I met again, established in an old-world apartment in Salisbury Street, Strand, which had, I believe, once been occupied by d'Orsay, amusing a growing circle with paradox and repartee. Relations were also established with the theatre, the connecting link being Johnston Forbes Robertson, who was abandoning portrait painting for the stage, and Mow¬ bray Morris, the " man of letters," who was then theatrical critic to The Times. Morris, who had strong views as to the independence of criticism, always insisted on buying his own stall for a first performance. He soon afterwards parted company with The Times, of which his father, said to be the Beau Morris of Thackeray, had been for many years the manager, owing to a quarrel in which he was probably right in principle but obviously wrong in practice. For many years he edited Macmillan's Magazine and was 16 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES one of the literary advisers to that eminent house. Many young authors owed him a debt for advice and encourage¬ ment at the beginning of their career. He had a fine and discriminating judgment in literature, with a sense of humour which carried him through hard times and he was among the few accomplished letter-writers who survived the last century. Cheap postage tended to substitute notes for letters, and the typing machine is finally killing all distinc¬ tion of epistolary style. There are not many left to-day who write real letters. Of those that remain, John Fortes- cue, the historian of the British Army, shares my regard for the memory of the " man of letters." Wilde brought me into touch with James McNeil Whistler, who had lately returned from temporary exile. With that remarkable man, the best of friends and the most inexorable of enemies, intimacy was immediate, and for the next year or two I was constantly with him. His famous law-suit with Ruskin, one of the few legal battles in which the public had been entertained with rare and not with judicial humour, had taken place not long previously, and one of its results had been Jimmy's bankruptcy, which the farthing damages obtained from Ruskin was inadequate to delay. There are few now who remember how he turned the tables on the Attorney General, Sir John Holker, who was employing all the arts of his forensic irony against the plaintiff. A number of nocturnes and arrangements had been brought into court and submitted to a bewildered jury, and Sir John, convinced that he had them well in hand, addressed the complainant ore rotundo. " Now, Mr. Whistler," he said, " do you think that you could make the gentlemen of the jury understand the merits of these paintings,—do you think you could make me understand them ? " Jimmy readjusted his eyeglass, and after steadily contemplating the learned advocate's self-complacent face for some seconds amid the breathless silence of the Court replied : " No, I don't think I could." After a protracted residence in Venice, where he reconstituted his financial position by EARLY YEARS 17 executing a wonderful series of etchings, he returned to Tite Street, not, however, to the White House but to a studio, to which was attached a series of rooms alternately revealing yellow walls and blue ceilings or blue walls and yellow ceilings, the tints of distemper having been mixed by his own hand to exactly the delicate shade required. Here were renewed the delightful Sunday morning " dejeuners," at which so many of his best things were said. At one of these we discovered we had sat down thirteen ; the number of arrivals was always rather uncer¬ tain. Among the guests was a young and very attractive girl, no doubt the youngest of those present. A few days afterwards she was suddenly taken ill and died. Nor did this apparent illustration of the old superstition end there. An elderly general who had also been present, and who was certainly the oldest of the party, heard the sad news at his club soon afterwards and dropped down dead. I had a somewhat similar experience not long afterwards when I was at Berlin. On the other hand, I have assisted at innumerable other tables of thirteen without any sinister result. The universality of the superstition is remarkable, and in the South of Europe a dinner of thirteen is absolutely taboo. To Whistler a gallery was a necessity and unlike most artists he worked most strenuously in the presence of a small group of admirers. Waldo Story, the American sculptor, was often there, and Walter Sickert, as well as another young American artist, Harper Pennington. At this time he was experimenting a good deal with petroleum as a medium, painting with brushes more than two feet long which he held by the extreme end in his nervous delicate fingers, surveying his picture and his model across the whole length of the studio, and then dashing up at a run to place the telling stroke on the canvas. I made a rough calculation one day of the mileage he covered during a day's work. Occasionally I used to assist him in printing his etchings. We obtained the best hand-made paper out c 18 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES of old folios which frequently had a number of blank pages at the beginning and the end. These were carefully damped and brushed with a soft long-haired brush to rough the surface, and Jimmy came to regard me as something of an expert in their preparation. The inking of the plate was a labour of infinite patience demanding experience and dexterity. He worked it over and over again with the flat of the hand until precisely the right proportion of ink remained, and even then after we had put the plate through the press only a few proofs were selected as adequate, and the majority perhaps were destroyed. A whole morning might go in producing only two or three which satisfied his fastidious standard of perfection. Whistler would at times enlarge for my benefit on his conception of art. He admitted that there was an art or rather a craft of illustration, of pictorial and historical representation. But this was a craft which did not interest him. The painter had to render and give eternity to such combinations of colour in atmosphere as his artistic sensi¬ bility taught him would constitute a harmony. Such combinations might even be present in actuality when nature had for once done the right thing. But nature's presentation was, he contended, often glaring, crude and inharmonious. Therefore to the young student who attempted to justify his claim to paint exactly what he saw Jimmy retorted, " If you do you will be sorry when you see what you paint." It was not the painter's business to tell a story or evoke an emotion, except the emotion produced by a conscient sense of beauty. " Those are trees, I suppose," said some one, indicating a dark patch in one of his nocturnes. " Very possibly," said Jimmy, " I don't know." For him they were only a dark mass which gave value to the light of a bursting rocket against the sky. In portraiture he held that the subject should be presented as seen in a room, at a certain distance from the eye, enveloped in a certain atmosphere ; not in high relief and standing out as it were in front of the frame, " with the EARLY YEARS 19 iris showing the reflection of the window and the hansom cab beyond it, upside down ! " There was a worthy and conscientious painter in water colours who won the enthusiastic approval of Ruskin and achieved a certain mid-Victorian repute by spending years of his life on a camp-stool in front of St. Mark's at Venice and elaborately reproducing with a telescopic sight every detail, crevice and tessera of mosaic in that astoundingly harmonious whole. Jimmy stood one day behind him, affecting to take a deep interest in his miniature brush- work, while with a piece of white chalk he wrote on the back of his victim's coat, " I am totally blind." Thus unconsciously embellished, the good man laboriously worked on, a joy to the passing tourist, and the devil in Whistler who could quote Scripture was ready with his appropriate tag about the one who getteth up early and taketh pains and is only the more behind. Few of the old Academic School escaped his mordant humour. He was once in a country house where Poynter was also staying, "poor old Poynter," as he called him. The latter went out one morning to draw in the park, and there Jimmy found him, surrounded by a group of admiring ladies who were watching the great man at work. " What are you doing there, Poynter ? " said he. " Oh," replied Poynter deprecatingly, " I am only touching up a little thing I began here many years ago." " That's no excuse, Poynter ! " was his parting shot as he walked on. They had known each other as young men in Paris with du Maurier and others. When the latter was producing his novel of Trilby, in the first serial numbers Whistler was unmistakably indicated among the characters, and not altogether flatteringly, both in the text and the illustrations. He entered a strident protest, with the result that these references were eliminated. Where his art was concerned the genial master took himself very seriously, and it passed the wit of most men to get the best of it in a quarrel with him. One day we were preparing th© catalogue for a 20 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES collection of his etchings to be exhibited in the spring. His spirit of mischief conceived the expedient of printing under each title one or two selections from judgments passed on his works by the critics, which in many if not in most cases had no reference to the particular plate. To these strictures some comments in marginal notes were added by the " Butterfly " himself. A passage culled from one eminent critic attached to a particularly charming dry- point had been ; " There is merit in them and I do not wish to understate it." When the proofs arrived, the printer (but was it the printer ?) had read " understand " in place of " understate,.'''' " That," said Jimmy, " is too providenti¬ ally good to be altered, and we will let it stand as it is." The final page of the catalogue contained a few felicitous selections from the Book of Proverbs: " Therefore is judgment far from us,"—" We all roar like bulls," etc. He used to say that his early New England education, based on the scriptures, stood him in good stead in controversial battles, and his unfailing memory was always ready with a quotation appropriate to the situation. No man ever loved his own work as Whistler did. It was his particular joy to get back by some excuse or other and keep in his studio pictures with which he had long parted. This passion for recovering his former productions, not from mercenary motives, for Jimmy was never merce¬ nary and scrupulously honourable about obligations, took on one occasion a curious form. One of his old patrons had lost a great deal of money in business and found himself obliged to dispose of his collection. Whistler convinced him that he would himself be able to obtain better prices for his own work by placing it where he knew it to be in demand, than could be secured in an auction room. Thus he obtained for a few weeks the custody of six of his beloved pictures, among which was the beautiful " Symphony in White," and also a seventh of which he had made a present to this patron. Now as regards this last, a wonderful atmospheric presentation of sky and sea and sand, he EARLY YEARS 21 reflected long on the following lines, wliich. he explained to his friend, who took no exception to the proposition. "As regards the six pictures ; well, I will obtain for you the best conditions available. But this other picture you know was a gift. Now a gift implies a certain relation of esteem and affection between giver and receiver, and so long as that relation subsists the gift preserves its character as evidence of the relation. On the other hand to contemplate selling such a gift would imply a cessation of the relations by which the picture came into your possession. If you invite me to sell that picture for you those relations have obviously ceased, and in short the picture must revert to the giver ! " And so it remained in his possession for many years.1 Prominent among the Whistlerians was Pellegrini, known to his friends as the Pelican, the famous caricaturist of Vanity Fair who, as Jimmy used to say, taught all the others what they were never able to do. An exile from his native Naples," Ape " was of the rarest blood of Bohemia. Although he passed the greater part of a lifetime in London his English remained rudimentary, and did not go much beyond a working knowledge of the cruder forms of expression not used in polite society. There was in those days an Italian confectioner's shop in Great Portland Street where Neapolitan ices were supplied to clients, and a large bottle of lemonade, with a lemon in the neck in place of a cork, adorned the window to indicate the character of the house. At the back of the shop was a little room where the best of Italian cooking could be sampled, and there I used occasionally to lunch with the Pelican and Tosti and Costa and other eminences of the colony. Pellegrini would sit upon a barrel in the doorway leading from the back room to the shop, eating his polpette and pausing from time to time to address the young lady behind the counter as " angeol." That little shop in due course expanded and became Pagani's Restaurant where, when declining health 1 This picture is now in the gallery of Mrs. Gardner, at Boston, 22 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES and the ambition to become a portrait painter in which he did not succeed, made life difficult for our old friend, he was hospitably cared for by the kindly proprietor. In 1881 I published a small volume of poems written after leaving Oxford under the title of Songs in the South, and in a measure enjoyed success, for after a kindly welcome from the reviewers, the whole small edition was disposed of. Wilde at that time also brought out his first volume of poems. I had endeavoured, but in vain, to induce him to eliminate one or two passages which violated my own sense of taste. They revealed his ability, his command of language and feeling for colour. But there was an artificia¬ lity in the longer and more recent poems and a conscious¬ ness which had not been so apparent in his earliest efforts. I remember finding him one morning engaged upon one of the longer poems in that volume, with a botanical work in front of him from which he was selecting the names of flowers most pleasing to the ear to plant in his garden of verse. There was more power behind him than he really used. In those early Bohemian days I saw a great deal of that brilliant but unhappy man, and as a year or so later we quarrelled irretrievably and met no more, I feel the greater obligation to do justice to certain aspects of the man as I knew him. And here also I would record a debt, inasmuch as he helped me to independence of thought and opinion. Normal education and surroundings had exercised a certain restraint on an imagination which resented such control, and association with this daring and gifted personality brought me nearer to emancipation from convention. He had undoubtedly a keen perception of beauty, almost over¬ shadowed by his tremendous sense of humour, which led him into extravagances of paradox. His laughter was genuine, spontaneous and infectious. He had a vivid quick¬ ness of apprehension, and an absorbent memory. But at the period of our acquaintance he had accomplished little to entitle him to other recognition than that which his EARLY YEARS 23 ready wit and deliberate eccentricity commanded. His literary and dramatic gifts were developed later and have been fully recognized since his tragic end. What was less appreciated then as now was his really genial and kindly nature, which seemed at times in strident contrast with his egotism, self-assertion and incorrigible love of notoriety. No one was more ready than he was at that time to accept the laugh against himself, and no one could be more generous in acknowledging the qualities and gifts of his friends. Of that unhappy madness which many years afterwards made havoc of a gifted life, we saw no premonition in those London days. On the contrary, an incident which I well remember revealed that he was fully alive to the peril of undesirable associations. In some studio exhibition we had met a man, now long since dead, who had rather impressed me with his exposition of artistic ideals, and on my referring with interest to his observations as we came away, Wilde observed: " Yes, he is most agreeable, but you should know that he is not a man in whose company we could afford to be seen." On another occasion, when there had been a disastrous flood in Lambeth after an unusually high tide, and a number of houses of the very poor were wrecked, we went together to see what we could do to help the unfortunate families who were camping in the street, and he penetrated into a miserable tenement and talked to an old bed-ridden Irish woman, cheering her with his merry humour and assisting her with little necessaries for which, as he said, she had more than compensated him by praying that " the Lord would give him a bed in glory." A wretched bed was all her world, and a bed in glory was her ideal. He was generous and reckless, with no thought for the morrow, and indeed indolent until a desperate obligation to work came home to him. I would like this side of his nature to be known, and that some kindly thought should go back to the tragic life of which we hoped so much, the more so because we quarrelled, and when there is a quarrel 24 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES probably neither of the parties to it is wholly in the right. His personality in those days was an outrage to the ordinary philistine, who nevertheless suddenly found himself confronted by a flash of humour or a profound observation which commanded his respect. The attraction of his dominant personality took a strong hold upon me. I believed him to have a touch of genius, and indeed it was there, when he did not do it injustice by courting notoriety. My friends criticized the ascendency which he began to exercise, and being young I took a certain defiant pride in then criticism. To enterprising youth the numbers are always wrong, and rejection with the remnant satisfies a certain sense of self-pride. Henri Murger's Vie de Boheme was our gospel, but we perhaps forgot that the real moral of that immortal book is to be found in the introduction. Wilde, who by now had received the compliment of being burlesqued on the stage, became the accepted protagonist of a movement which he was himself much too brilliant to take seriously. A limited number of enthusiasts painted the porticoes of their houses peacock blue, and many young ladies from South Kensington went, as Whistler most unkindly put it, " down Petticoat Lane, there on a Sabbath to gather from the dull rags of ages wherewith to bedeck themselves." It is strange, looking back on what was known as the aesthetic movement, to remember how devoid of all sense of the appropriate were certain gaunt and sallow ladies, who used to appear at the private views dressed in a poor travesty of the robes which so well became the opulent beauty of a Venetian courtesan on the canvas of a Paris Bordone. It was inevitable under the circumstances that Wilde should be invited to lecture in America. He had not yet begun to write plays and since for him as for Beaudelaire " le superflu etait le necessaire," he accepted the invitation. What he was to tell the lecture-loving public in the States he hardly knew himself. But it had been assumed that he had a message to deliver, and one had to be found. It EARLY YEARS 25 was vaguely presumed to be about Art, and Whistler's comments were entertaining, for none but the artist, indeed none living but one artist, had any title to speak on such a subject. Just before he left he was entertained to dinner at one of the taverns of Bohemia. " I hope," said our guest to Whistler, " that I shall not be sea-sick crossing the Atlantic."—" Well, Oscar, if you are," said Jimmy, " throw up Burne-Jones ! " He had spontaneously offered to take my little book of poems with him and have it published in America, and to a young man ambitious of recognition it seemed an attractive proposition. This it was which led to our quarrel, the story of which can have but little interest for others. A member of the firm which produced the eccentric volume informed me that they had had carte blanche to do what they liked with it, and had merely regarded it as a sort of advertisement or appeal to notoriety, and had for this purpose used up a lot of old blocks, ostensibly for decoration. A letter which I wrote to him, in which I also warned him of the harm which I felt he was doing to himself by his extravagant performances in America, gave profound offence. When he returned dressed in a fantastic suit of red plush, assuming a sort of Olympian attitude as of one who could do no wrong, we parted in anger and did not meet again. Whistler also parted company with him soon afterwards, and a paper battle ensued in which as usual the painter had the last word. Intimacy with Whistler did not prevent my also seeing a great deal of Burne-Jones, antagonistic as these two were to each other in every respect. Those who only knew Burne-Jones from his work and might seek to deduce from its spirit what manner of man he was, would never conceive the gaiety, the humour and the wholly lovable nature of the man. He had passed through a bitter period of struggle, never forsaking his high ideals, and had had to wait long before appreciation and recognition came. But he was always assured of the devotion of a small group of friends 26 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES which such a character as his cannot fail to command. I spent many happy evenings at the Grange in West Ken¬ sington in that happy family circle. There were days when in the studio, which was guarded with a certain reverent mystery until the moment when the master was satisfied, things had not gone well and he was verging on depression, and then in the company of a few friends the old humour would reassert itself and preoccupation would be forgotten till the morrow. I remember a delightful spontaneous outburst of the artist's feeling one day in the garden when he called to his daughter to bring him a hat, and a new silk hat of ceremony was produced. " Not that thing," said B.-J., dropping it on the grass and putting his foot through five and twenty shillings, " bring me a proper hat! " At supper he would have a sheaf of little papers and a pencil by him and would illustrate his ideas with the most delightful caricatures, which were quite peculiar to himself. His own person was always represented by a little owl, which in a few strokes assumed the varying expression of his feelings as affected by the episode under discussion. His original sense of the humour of things and the way he saw them may be illustrated by the story of his Neapolitan model which he told us one evening as a tragedy in three acts, with an epilogue. She was a very silent girl, and during a month of work in his studio she only spoke four times. At the end of the first week she suddenly spontaneously exclaimed: "I was born on a burning mountain." That is Act I, supplying the intro¬ duction and the local colour. At the end of the second week she sighed and said : " I love Giacinto." At the end of the third week she was heard to mutter fiercely: "I wish I were the Queen, I would kill Mariannina." Then came the epilogue and her dramatic vengeance for the slighting of her charms. She was being paid off and spoke, for her at length, in three staccato sentences : "You have been kind to me.—I will tell you something for your good.— Don't eat the blue ices ! " EARLY YEARS 27 He did for me a wonderful thing which I have always remembered with the deepest gratitude. I had been spend¬ ing the summer in France, at Amboise in Touraine. Not far away at Tours there are in the Museum two of the predella panels belonging to the great Mantegna picture in San Zeno at Verona. The third, a crucifixion, is in the Louvre. When after the fall of Napoleon the looted trea¬ sures of Italy were restored, the Madonna went back to Verona, but the three wonderful little panels of the predella had been dispersed and they remained in France. Burne- Jones wished to have photographs of the two at Tours. But they had never been photographed and as it seemed to be very difficult to obtain authority to reproduce them I went every Saturday to Tours and made a careful pencil copy of one of them, the Agony in the Garden, for him. He was much touched at the desire, a very natural one, to give him pleasure. Not long afterwards, having suspected that I was wavering whether I should take up the diplomatic service as a profession, or rather follow art or literature, he told me that if I cared to come and work in his studio he would gladly welcome me and would help me in every way he could. I was deeply impressed with his kindness, the more so as his studio, like the workshop of the alchemist, was a place of jealously guarded access into which few penetrated, except when exhibitions were deliberately organized there. But I knew well enough that though I had always had a certain facility for drawing I had no talent which could justify my accepting such a proposal. Rossetti, who was in failing health and had become a recluse, I never knew, nor did I ever meet Swinburne. Unfortunately I early got myself into trouble with the author of Poems and Ballads, and more especially, as I was informed, with his constant companion, Theodore Watts, who was of course more royalist than the king. The latter had not then assumed his supplementary cognomen of Dunton. When he did so he received a postcard from Whistler with only these two words above the well-known 28 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES emblem of a butterfly with a sting in the tail, " What's Dunton ? " Swinburne, who in earlier days had addressed an enthusiastic poem to " Walt Whitman in America," afterwards wrote a vitriolic attack upon his literary work in the Fortnightly Review, in which he described him as pursuing a Hottentot Venus with a muck-rake, together with other similar extravagances of hyperbolic denunciation. This article aroused my youthful indignation, as I was a sincere if discriminating admirer of " Leaves of Grass " and " Drumtaps," which contained a genuine outburst of natural song, a roughhewn art developing under elemental conditions. Thus moved I published a counterblast in some verses which were regarded as lese-majeste. I have found them among my papers. The august shades will not be vexed if they are reprinted. TO WALT WHITMAN. After reading a recent article in the " Fortnightly Review." Laugh loud from the merry old throat, rough Walt, in your heaven of rest, For the curse of the prophet of Putney proscribes you the isles of the blest ! Oh, where are the frenzied invective, the sonnets that " stung like a whip," Protests anapaestic, indignant, that flashed from his radical lip ? He has passed from the van to the rearguard, forsaking the Ayes for the Noes, Renouncing the lyric of passion to preach in extravagant prose ! He has turned on you too, Camerado, has passed from the few to the throng ; Content you and smile and remember he called on you once for a song ! But for us, we will cling to our follies ; and save us, oh tyrannous Truth, From a middle-age spent in recanting the faith and the fire of our youth ! EARLY YEARS 29 And as we rejoiced to have found you, accepting the whole for the part, The virtues implying the failings, we will keep your old place in the heart. We shall say you were shaggy and rough and untamed as the land of your birth, But large with the heart of its greatness to compass the glory of earth. We will love you and praise and remember when lilacs are bloom¬ ing once more, And thrill at the camp and the drumtap, and weep with the bird on the shore. There is music in murmur of forest and rhythm in slapping of waves, And of such was the music and rhythm, old Walt, of thy mutinous staves. For the trick of the rhyme and the tinkle are easy enough to acquire, But the insight, the reading of nature, were thine, and the throb and the fire ! There is more of the roar of the ocean with thee, of the scent of the pines, Than in all his recoiling and foaming up and down anapaestical lines ! So laugh and content you, old Walt, while the fever remains let him rave ; Let him be ; he has damned you with Byron, who hardly will turn in his grave ! But, oh bard of the magical measures, go back to your kisses and doves, The allurements of alliteration, romaunts of your troubadour loves ! Disbelieve, since you must, in the ardour of old you were first to extol, Disbelieve in the future, the present, and if need be, look after your soul ! But forbear to believe that your footprints are stainless wherever you trod, Because there was lilt in your lewdness and rhyme in your girding at God. 30 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES There are more tears on earth when a poet renounces the stars of his youth, Than for all the blind groping of dunces who never set eyes upon Truth ! My first attempt to satisfy the Civil Service Commissioners and to enter the Diplomatic service proved a severe blow to my vanity. There was only one vacancy to be filled, and six candidates were nominated to compete for it. The test examination covered some ten or twelve subjects, and though I came out top in two-thirds of these, and second or third in the others, the Commissioners disqualified me for handwriting and orthography, to which I must admit I had paid little attention. There was nothing for it but to await another occasion, which did not occur until July in the following year, when, having taken more care to write legibly and correct my papers, I succeeded in passing in at the head of the list. Meanwhile at this period I used to go on one or two evenings every week to Hackney, to work for the Eton Mission, where Spring-Rice took a great interest in a boys' club. His curious and rather bitter irony was illustrated by a story, which I suspected him of having invented, about a lady of fashion who was trying in her own way to do much what we were aiming at, by visiting in the poor quarters of London. At one door she was refused admission by an indignant defender of her own privacy, who recommended her " not to come here and clean your soul on me ! " I had a reading class for grown-up men, and a small class of working men to whom I endeavoured to impart the elements of political economy. There were a few among them in whom a ten hours working day had not benumbed all con¬ sciousness of their dead weight of ignorance, and who desired to learn in order to help their fellow workers. But the most successful of our enterprises were no doubt the theatrical performances which we organized at Hackney, where the genuine appreciation of the audience was an ample reward for the trouble. EARLY YEARS 31 While it is my intention to write down as truthfully and suggestively as possible what I remember of interesting people and public events, I shall refrain for obvious reasons from touching on matters which are of an intimate personal character. There are incidents and experiences in life which must remain inviolate in the sanctuary of memory. And if in these pages I seem to refer after more than thirty years with a certain reverent tenderness to a remarkable personality which influenced my life at this time, it is because her brief passage across this troubled world was a source of so much delight to my particular group of friends, as well as to many of a much older generation, that to pass over all mention of her beneficent presence would seem an inexplicable omission on the part of one who was among the first to be sensible of the spell which she exercised. She has moreover filled a conspicuous place in other biographies. It was in the year 1882 that I first met that radiant little being, with the genius of quick intuitive apprehension and sympathetic response, who was known as Laura Tennant, and who for one short happy year became Laura Lyttelton, to die in April 1886 and make the world darker for a large number of intensely devoted friends. It can have been given to few to make so deep an impression on contemporary life at so early an age. She was only eighteen when we first met, and a common adoration of Shelley opened the door to immediate intimacy. At a time of considerable depression and disillusion she brightened my way with her magical power of sympathy and lucid appreciation of the things which really matter. She was profoundly believing in an unquestioning spirit of childlike faith, which did not obtrude itself, but in its large charity was only an added grace. A favourite precept quoted in her first letter to me was from Marcus Aurelius : " Adorn thyself with sim¬ plicity and modesty, and with indifference to the things which lie between virtue and vice." Our friendship quickly ripening served to dissipate false lights and artificial standards, and brought me back to the 32 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES clear morning air. Therefore to her also I would record unforgettable gratitude. Early in the following year she left England to spend some months in South Africa with a sister who was threatened with the malady to which so many of that brilliant family were victims. Our personal intercourse was consequently for a time interrupted, but her letters were wonderful, and so they remain when re-read after an interval of more than half a life-time. Of these a large number are in my posses¬ sion. If years hence the little packet were to fall into the hands of one who knew none of those concerned the letters would no doubt arouse curiosity and interest in the character who, if genius can be revealed in sympathy, had such a touch of genius. They were, however, not meant for other eyes, and I shall respect their confidence. But as testimony to a certain sense of imaginative mysticism, which I have never seen alluded to in the references to Laura Tennant in other books, it may be legitimate to quote the concluding passage from one of these written in the house of Lady Haversham at Tintagel, where I had hoped to join the party but was prevented by obligations at the Foreign Office : " There is a mist on the sea to-day and the land is grey and refuses to smile. The air is full of the silent music that only those that stand in solitary places are allowed to hear, and the church lifts up its strong tower to God and speaks of the half-hour of silence in Heaven in which we will hear nothing but the soothed sobs of Christ's comforted children. Good-bye." There are many such spontaneous outbursts of feeling in these remarkable letters. One re¬ ceived at the end of the same year in Berlin has its haunting Christmas message : " And what can I wish you at this peace-bringing season. Peace—yes Peace, not where there is no Peace, but the God of Peace in your heart and the Christchild arms round you always, and the little Sacred Feet to lead you in the difficult places." And these passages do not belong to letters of sentiment, but only to the corres¬ pondence between two devoted friends. Mrs. Asquith in EARLY YEARS 33 her autobiography has written that the two people who best knew the difference between her sister and herself were Mr. Balfour and myself. I am more interested in the resem¬ blance, which lay in a common largeness of heart, rapidity of intuition and freedom from the trammels of convention. I also foregathered much at this time with old Sam Ward, the universal " uncle," from America, who had a certain number of devoted friends in England, and had finally settled down in rooms above Sotheran's in Piccadilly. He had been, or had done, so people said, most things in an adventurous life, and undoubtedly had reigned for a con¬ siderable period at Washington as King of the Lobby. Several fortunes had passed through his hands to disappear one after another, but out of the last wreck his lawyer took pleasure in announcing that he had saved enough to ensure Uncle Sam having a good dinner for the rest of his life. And no one enjoyed a good dinner more. Whatever had been secured upon him, he shared royally with his friends, whom he loved to entertain. He was one of the last of the generation that quoted Horace, in which tradition I had myself also been brought up. An admirable raconteur, he had an endless repertoire of reminiscences and adventures. Whenever I felt depressed I used to go and dine with him, and seventy and three-and-twenty spent a cheerful evening together. One night he took me to supper with Irving behind the scenes at the Lyceum, where with the merry veteran Toole, Yates of the World and W. L. Courtney, who had lately forsaken Oxford for London, our host entertained us till 3 a.m. It was at a dinner given by Sam Ward at the " Blue Posts " in Cork Street, that I first met Marion Craw¬ ford, of whom I was to see much in later years, sitting be¬ tween him and Henry James, who enlarged on his admiration for Zola. Crawford was Uncle Sam's real nephew, and not like the rest of us only one by adoption. He had just written his first novel at Sam Ward's suggestion. It was produced in forty-two days, and was attracting much attention. In his second book, Dr. Claudius, he gave an D 34 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES admirable portrait of his uncle, who appears appropriately as Uncle Hector. I remember that when our prolonged banquet broke up I wandered away with Crawford in search of adventure. Eventually we found ourselves in the parlour of a tavern in Covent Garden, allowed to remain open all night for the drivers of the vegetable carts, of which privilege the night- birds and late drinkers took advantage. Crawford was collecting types and we found not a few there. They had to be propitiated and my new friend fortunately had a head as strong as his body. It was daylight when we separated. I sent him a Bacchanalian Ode congratulating him on his pastmastership in the cult of Bacchus, and received from him the following somewhat libellous reply. " Your hymn ad majorem gloriam Bacchi reached me yesterday and is a masterpiece. Not that you need knuckle down in that fashion. If long practice has given me a certain command of the subject, I must acknowledge that your natural gifts are surprising. In a long life you may hope to order a good number of shutters for your friends. It is at present with you a remarkable if somewhat untrained gift. The position of cupbearer to his majesty our king and uncle, which I have held more than once for six months at a time, would raise you to wonderful perfection. Omar Khayyam would soon stand to you in the relation of a spot of candle-grease to the gleaming torch of liberty, and the American eagle would hide his diminished cocktail—I suppose he is a cock eagle and not a hen—before the grander plumage of his victor. ... You will not publish this letter in The Times ? Rather deposit it in the archives of the F.O. Nobody will ever find it there." I had the privilege of bringing Uncle Sam and Laura Tennant together, and the friendship which resulted between the dear old man who was spending his last years in making other people happy and the wonderful woman-child was delightful to witness for the short time it lasted. All her letters to him were given to me after his death. They are— EARLY YEARS 35 as indeed every one of her letters was—touched with her own individuality and charm of expression. In one of them, chosen at random and mostly about books, the following passage is characteristic : " Everything to do with Emerson fascinates me. I was reading Ireland's recollections of the great Prose Poet and came upon your name. I felt so happy that I knew you, for you knew him and he loved you. I wish you would talk to me about him some day. I never manage to ask you half the questions that lie like sealed letters in my heart waiting for your sympathetic fingers to open them. ... I read very few French novels, for on the whole they bring earth nearer than heaven, and there is so much in common life that does that. What I should like to do if I wrote a book would be to write something that was a Bridge to the City of God, a bridge over which the poorest and the children could pass without paying a toll. Good-night, dearest Uncle Sam." Euthanasia came to our old friend at last as he sat in an arm-chair looking at the sunset at Pegli on theMediterranean shore. I had written to tell Laura the circumstances of his death and she replied : " Your letter was a great comfort. I cannot feel with our beloved poet (Shelley) that all we loved of him should be, but for our grief, as if it had not been. I feel he is as he always was, very near and helpful and true, with his face that smiled on every one and his hands that blessed the whole world and his heart that refused no one. Oh ! why did I not show him more and better how dear he was to me. What is the good of regretting ! And yet I often feel that the kings of my life pass uncrowned and the stars unblessed." With the exception of Lord Rosebery, Lord Crewe and one or two more of my own generation there can be few alive now in this country or even in the United States who still preserve an affectionate memory of old Uncle Sam. But the famous war hymn of his sister, Julia Ward Howe, remains one of the immortal possessions of the American people. To me it is a pleasure and a duty to place this 36 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES tributary wreath upon one of the many graves which I keep in mind upon the night of All Souls. Early in 1883 I first became acquainted with Mr. Glad¬ stone in the ever hospitable house of Mr. F. Leveson Gower at Holmbury, where he was spending Saturday to Monday with his wife and daughter (Mrs. Drew). Lowell was the other guest of importance. The Prime Minister was in great spirits, and talked on every kind of subject, from the rapacity of publishers to the Channel Tunnel, which he said he would never oppose. He was in the minority in those days. George and I were quite young men, and therefore only listeners. But Lowell was of an age and calibre to enter the lists with the great man, and it was good to hear them together. Mr. G. had much to say to us the first evening of Carlyle, who would, he thought, be held in memory chiefly on account of his extraordinary personality. He compared him to Johnson, in whom the human side was far more interesting than the literary. Lowell considered that Carlyle was somewhat belittled by what he called his Scottish money-craving weakness ; there was evidence of this in his correspondence with Emerson and at his death he left forty-five thousand pounds. The influence of Sunday seemed to have an effect on Mr. Gladstone's trend of mind, for at lunch he entertained us with ecclesiastical conversation, discussing Welsh Churchmen, American Episcopalians and the Salvation Army. He had sympathy with the endeavour of its organizers to reach the soul of the masses, but he gravely criticized what he described as the substitution of eccentricities for the fixed rules of religion. The movement was then only in its infancy. At dinner the conversation took a more congenial literary turn. He had just been reading Crawford's Mr. Isaacs, which, he admitted, was a remarkable book, but not one which commanded his sym¬ pathy. He held its basis to be a false philosophy, and he deprecated the attempt to reconcile the irreconcilable. I should have liked to protest against what seemed a narrow view, for the philosophy of that book, if indeed it was meant EARLY YEARS 37 to embody any philosophic idea, was that the big men of every race, however widely differentiated, when their souls are touched are alike in feeling, conceive the same nobilities and see the same right and wrong. Mr. G. spoke with great admiration of Charlotte Bronte. But he had no good word to say for Wuthering Heights. Here Lowell joined issue and with insistence. Both, however, agreed in their verdict on Scott, and both held the Bride of Lammermoor to be his masterpiece. Mr. Gladstone could only compare it to a Greek Tragedy. iEschylus, had he lived in modern times, might have written just such a book. This was the first of a series of such meetings at Holmbury with Mr. Gladstone, of whom perhaps I saw more than any of my young contemporaries except George Leveson Gower, who as his assistant private secretary was in constant intercourse with him. About a year later I had been spending Easter at Holm- bury, where Lord and Lady Granville were staying, and was invited to return there for the following week-end when the Gladstones were to join the party, as well as Sir George Dasent, who was the best of company. I had in the meantime joined the Foreign Office in July, 1883, and was then employed in the Western Department with my friend Cecil Spring-Rice, so I went down to Holmbury laden with boxes for the Secretary of State. Mr. Gladstone was then full of the lost Atlantis, and maintained that the " Challenger " soundings had established the fact of a submerged continent. He had been in corres¬ pondence with Ignatius Donelly, who wrote the suggestive book Ragnarok. He submitted as a parallel in popular tradition, of which all historic trace had been lost and which yet proved ultimately well-founded, the Homeric idea that the flat area of North Germany was all sea, which it un¬ doubtedly had once been, though ages before Homer. The conversation passed on to geology, and then to language and etymology, which was Dasent's particular subject. He suggested as a parallel to the accepted dictum that the 38 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES purest English was spoken at Inverness, where it was origin¬ ally an alien language, the case of Hanover where the effort to correct a bad local dialect had resulted in the populariza¬ tion of the purest German. The first evening Mr. G. was in a humorous vein. He had been playing a rubber with Lord Granville and his host, in the midst of which I heard him descanting on the origin and nature of Protestantism. A propos of which he told how one day a certain Damascus Jew presented him¬ self at the British Consulate and asked for British protection on the ground that he was a Protestant. How so, they asked, why do you call yourself a Protestant ? "I eat pork," was the answer, " and I don't believe in God." He was greatly concerned at the late census returns in France, where one-seventh of the population had, he main¬ tained, entered themselves as without religious belief ; " a vurry significant fact." But what to me was most interesting on this occasion was the manner in which his cordial antipathy to Disraeli betrayed itself more than once in conversation, perhaps almost unconsciously. He observed one day at breakfast that he thought the Liberal party had produced more black sheep than the Conservatives. " I will give them credit," he said with sonorous emphasis, " sorry as I am to have to say it, for less personal ambition, for greater disinterestedness than has been displayed in the party which I have the honour to lead " ; adding after a very slight pause, " except in one illustrious instance." Later in the day Disraeli had actually come under discus¬ sion and Sir George Dasent had been describing the flow of eloquence that had poured from his lips at a Royal Academy banquet, where he enlarged upon the inspiration which it was to him to come year by year and feast his eyes upon these triumphs of British Art. When they were walk¬ ing round the rooms afterwards, Dasent felt a hand upon his shoulder, and heard the voice of Dizzy whispering in his ear : " Did you ever see such a collection of rubbish in your life ? " " Did he say that ? " exclaimed Mr. G. " Oh EARLY YEARS 39 dear ! oh dear ! oh dear ! " " Yes," replied Sir George, " rather funny, wasn't it ? " " Funny ! you call it," the old man thundered indignantly ; "I call it devilish." This incident the significance of which impressed me and led me to recount it to a good many people at the time, formed the subject many years afterwards of a long correspon¬ dence in the Spectator, in which the various letter writers who claimed a sort of proprietary right in Gladstoniau reminiscences took an active part. None of them were able to trace the story to the fountain head, though there was a general idea that it had been disseminated by Robert Browning. I may have told it in his presence, or one of the others may have so repeated it to him. When the dis¬ cussion was over I informed the Editor of the Spectator of the circumstances, which I am perhaps the only one now alive to recall, as Sir George Leveson Gower does not himself remember the incident. Further conversation on books led to a general expression of appreciation of the romance which never ended, like The Three Musketeers with its sequels, and Lord Granville told a tale of the elder Dumas being asked by a friend after dining at a rather no-account party whether he had enjoyed himself. Dumas replied : "I should have been dreadfully bored if I had not been there myself." Finally I remember that when Dasent spoke of the passing of youth and how it was to be regretted, Mr. Gladstone dissented and, turning to me with a very kindly smile said: "No. All that you have we have had, and all the rest beside." Reading over my diaries of that time I realize the im¬ pression which the strong personality of the Prime Minister made upon me when I was twenty-three, as it did on men of a much older generation. But looking back on these and subsequent opportunities which I had for listening to his conversation and speeches, I have little doubt that this influence was not so much the effect of what he said as of the way in which he said it. His massive leonine head compelled regard. It was the flashing eye, the deep sonorous voice and 40 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES the carefully balanced emphasis which made his utterance appear so authoritative and carried the hearer away quite independently of the thought or matter of his discourse. Browning himself I met for the first time in 1883 at a dinner with Mr. Graham, where indeed I had also first seen Laura Tennant, the friend of his two then unmarried daughters Lady Horner and Lady Jekyll. His house in Grosvenor Place was full, not only of old Italian pictures, but of the works of Burne-Jones whose friend and patron he had always been, as well as of Rossetti. Browning was so eminently normal in conversation and appearance that it was difficult to conceive him as having affected an eccen¬ tricity of dress in early youth, as I had heard he did from my mother, who remembered meeting him and Tennyson at the very beginning of their career. He was however full of interesting reminiscences, and that evening there was much discussion of Rossetti. Browning regarded him as having in his latter days lost his mental balance, and he had some strange stories to tell in confirmation of his view. I was interested to hear the opinion of my host, than whom no one should have known better, that those weird women of his later pictures did not represent the real Rossetti. " They were only his illusions, yes, illusions," he said in his dreamy way. There was a curious fascination about that generous devotee of art, with the keen sensitive face and rather long white hair, and as a tribute to the memory of one for whom I felt sincere regard I would like to recall a story of him which was told me by Burne-Jones himself. He had just completed a very beautiful conception of the Christ in a blue glory of angels. Graham was very anxious to ac¬ quire it. But that was not possible, as it had already been disposed of. As a Scotchman Graham had no doubt been trained in the strictest tradition of puritan convention, and yet he was able to say ; "I wish I could have had that picture. I should like to have sent it to the Pope at Rome.'' The work at the Foreign Office was not particularly thrilling during the period of my employment there, a little EARLY YEARS 41 under a year. Sir Julian, afterwards Lord Pauncefote, was the permanent under-secretary ; Sir Thomas, now Lord, Sanderson was Lord Granville's private secretary. Sir Philip, afterwards Lord Currie, was assistant under¬ secretary. It was at dinner in his rooms that I first met Violet Fane (Mrs. Singleton), the future Lady Currie, whose Adventures of a Savage I had read with delight. Many years later I was to serve under their rule at the Embassy at Rome, as also for a time under Lord Bertie, who in my Foreign Office days directed the Eastern Department, and tempered his impeccable official precision and extremely able super¬ intendence of public affairs with a crudity and licence of expression in personal relations which lifted the hair of the newly joined. The head of my Department, the Western, retired soon after I had joined and we were then under the orders of an amiable gentleman whose somewhat pompous and pedantic habit of speech appealed to our sense of humour and offered great opportunities for the exercise of Bertie's caustic humour. Among many utterances with which he was credited I particularly remember the following, which be¬ trayed a singular lacuna in the knowledge of a man who was generally well-informed. Some years earlier the late Lord Salisbury had in a much-discussed speech compared his former colleague Lord Derby to Titus Oates. Our worthy senior, reading the speech at his club, assumed a puzzled look and, walking across to an acquaintance pointed to the passage with these remarkable words : "I have heard of Pontius Pilate, but who is Titus O-A-Tees 1 " Our duties, those of Cecil Spring-Rice and myself in the junior room, were confined to ciphering, keeping the current archives and copying out for signature the despatches pre¬ pared by our betters. It was also our duty to close and seal the bags carried all over Europe by the Queen's Messengers, as they were then called. A certain halo of prestige still clung to the career of the messenger, dating from the time when communications were difficult, especially in the Balkans, 42 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES and they were allowed a large latitude in the arrangements and the disbursements for their journeys. Many were the stories attaching to the memory of one Cecil Johnson, whose braggadocio manner carried him far, and who would stride down Dover pier arrayed in a flowing cloak, with his silver greyhound badge round his neck, and a string of porters following, clearing his way with " Room for Her Majesty's despatches! " Another well-known figure in European capitals was " Beauty " Stephens, who had spent some thirty years in the Foreign Office copying despatches in a large round hand and declining—he was not seriously pressed—to be promoted to what he called " head work." There was Leeds, whom we christened the " suburban entertainer," because of his skill as an after-dinner conjurer. He had also learned the trick of making the spinning needle stop at his half-crown at minor race-meetings, and was generally invited quietly by the proprietor or his confederate to move on and leave honest men to make their living. There was Lumley, who had succeeded in obtaining a com¬ mission in the German army in 1870 and joined his regiment in a bowler hat just in time to take part in the charge of Spicheren. There was Johnny Woodford, who had been Mario's pupil and could still produce the ghost of a voice in the tradition of a wonderful school. These and many more were welcomed by us at our various posts about the world with the latest news and papers from home. They are all gone now, and the humours and glories of the road are gone with them. Among those in the Foreign Office with whom I formed abiding friendship was Willie Compton, afterwards Marquess of Northampton. He took me for the first time to stay with his sister at Panshanger to see the great pictures. There I met Robert, Lord Lytton, who had known my mother in early youth. He talked to me most interestingly all through one evening about oriental religions, and then about poetry, taking up the curious standpoint that the outcry against imitation was unreasonable. Shakespeare had borrowed, just as the post-Elizabethans had borrowed EARLY YEARS 43 again from him. All poets had absorbed the ideas of their predecessors, and there was little they could do but say the same thing differently. In fact he held the view that Mr. Kipling holds of Homer, " He took what he required, just the same as me." The life of London in the 'eighties with all its interesting personalities had taken a firm hold upon me when the time came to leave it behind. 40 Grosvenor Square was the centre of interest, and all that was live and modern in the social world, including its political and intellectual elements, seemed to be drawn by some compelling attraction to the home of Laura and Margot Tennant, and their elder married sisters. I well remember, as the younger of the two drove me home on a May afternoon in 1884, a few hours before my departure from England, the feeling that I was stepping off into a new world and wondering whether it would in any way make up for the old one that I was leaving. CHAPTER II BERLIN, 1884-1885 In May, 1884 I was directed to join the Embassy at Berlin, an instruction which at the time I received without great enthusiasm, though it was undoubtedly an advantage to begin diplomatic life at an important Embassy rather than at a small Legation. I arrived there in June. Berlin was then a much more modest capital than it became by the end of the century, and lacking in individuality. A disappointing first impression was redeemed by the moment of the year. The lime trees were in bloom and their perfume was in the air along the famous avenue leading from the Brandenburg gate to the Schloss. The Thiergarten with its shady alleys was then unadorned with the theatrical statues with which the last Hohenzollern Emperor so profusely endowed it, and only the monument erected after 1870, generally known by a German combination word as the Asparagus of Victory, revealed the impotence of modern monumental conception to rise to a great occasion. The Ambassador, Lord Ampthill, was already established for the summer at his villa at Potsdam, to which colony of palaces and barracks I was taken on the afternoon of my arrival by the Counsellor, or as we then called him the Secretary of Embassy, afterwards our Ambassador in Russia, Sir Charles Scott. We visited Sans-Souci and looked with respect at the historic mill. The apes and parrots still grimacing on the walls of Voltaire's room were suggestive of its sometime guest and reminiscent of the strange camaraderie of two eccentric men of genius. The Watteaus, Lancrets and Paters were delightful. But I had not yet learned to 44 BERLIN, 1884-1885 45 appreciate the charm of roccoco, and took only a moderate interest in the exiguous washing apparatus and the venerable toothbrush of the Great Frederick, whose favourite residence seemed a very modest establishment for so great a man. We went to tea with the Ampthills, who were most cordial and made me feel quite at home in spite of the inevitable awe with which a modest attache naturally regards the formidable presence of his Ambassador. But there never lived a kindlier chief, or a more attractive personality than Odo Russell, who for me had long been enrolled in the band of famous men. I have known many ambassadors since, but none perhaps so admirably equipped to occupy a post to which he did honour. As a linguist he was remarkable, and his knowledge extended also to the literature of the four languages which he spoke with equal facility. A pro¬ found student of Dante he was equally familiar with the whole bibliography of Goethe. He gave to all impartially the best of his singularly gifted mind with a natural and unself- assertive charm of expression which was entirely winning. He may have had his enemies and critics, but I never met them, and during the three months of our intercourse I could not detect the place which might have invited attack. His popularity in Berlin was unquestioned, as it had been in Rome during the thirteen years which he spent in that city, where indeed I think he had left his heart. I remember one evening in the garden at Potsdam observing to him that the miniature Dome of the Garrison Church as seen framed in the trees reminded me of the form of the dome of St. Peter's, and he said that it had actually been built on those lines and that he often came and sat in that part of the garden and played with the illusion that he was once more looking from the Pincio into the Roman sunset. I told him of my childhood's recollections of Pius IX descending from his gilded coach to walk on the Hill of Gardens, and that elicited an interesting Roman experience from his store of memories. Not long after his marriage he was on the Pincio with his wife and the late Lord Acton. It must have been 46 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES soon after the definite rupture of the Vatican with Dollinger and the Old Catholics. Pius IX, who was walking through the gardens just as I had seen him among the kneeling people, and blessing them as he passed with the two first fingers of the right hand, perceived Lord Odo and his wife and with a smile of recognition gave them a special benedic¬ tion. Then he caught sight of Acton, and suddenly changing his hand from the vertical to the horizontal position he made that rapid shaking movement of the first and second fingers by which the Italian signifies negation. " No blessing for you, my friend," was indicated by the gesture with painful distinctness. Lord Odo had always enjoyed a privileged position with Pius IX, who had a great sense of humour. At one moment when the Pope was very displeased with the British Govern¬ ment he had gone to Castel Gandolfo, the summer villa, for an interview. He had dropped on his knee in accordance with the etiquette of the Papal Court, whereupon Pius placed a hand upon his shoulder, and kept him kneeling throughout the interview, with a merry twinkle in his eye. " Ah, my son," he said at the end of the audience, " I wish you were a Catholic. I should send you for a fortnight's penance to the Monastery at Genzano. It would do you a world of good." Almost simultaneously with myself there arrived as an attache at the Italian Embassy in Berlin the Marchese Imperiali, a warm-hearted high-spirited Neapolitan gen¬ tleman with whom I have maintained a lifelong friendship ever since. By a curious coincidence we, who began our diplomatic careers abroad almost on the same day, ended them as Ambassadors in each other's respective countries throughout the Great War. He learned to understand us as few Italian representatives have ever done, and we owe him no small debt for the faithful manner in which he interpreted the British mentality to his Government. The Ampthills asked me to bring him to dinner at Potsdam, whither I went two or three evenings every week, and we had an Italian BERLIN, 1884-1885 47 evening with more reminiscences from my chief. He told us of the genesis of the post in Rome which he had occupied so long. Somewhere about 1820 a secretary at the Legation at Munich who was in delicate health migrated to Italy. From Rome he wrote despatches to the Foreign Office, which were found so interesting that on his death a semi-official successor, Petre, was appointed, followed by Lord Lyons and subsequently by Odo Russell. After the entry of the King of Italy in 1870 this semi-official representation at the Vatican came to an end. On his way to Rome in 1858 Lord Odo had stopped in Piedmont. There he was presented to Cavour, who told him there would be war the following year, for it was their intention to put the Italian question to the issue. Lord Odo replied that if Piedmont attacked Austria she would antagonize the feeling of Europe. " But," said Cavour, " suppose we make Austria attack us." He inquired whether this would be possible. " Yes," was the answer, " but not yet, we shall not be ready till next year. The best campaigning season begins in May. Austria will attack us then." Lord Odo admitted that he thought Cavour was deluding himself and he wrote home in that sense. But Austria declared war on the 3rd of May, 1859, in accordance with Cavour's programme. Cardinal Antonelli was not, he said, the power many people believed him to be, he was only the faithful servant of Pio Nono, who was really his own Minister and a pretty astute one. As an instance of his ready resource the ambassador told us how, when the French were exercising an unwelcome pressure, the Cardinal Secretary of State was instructed to produce the text of a message from Lord Palmerston offering the Pope a British ship and an asylum in Malta in the event of Garibaldi reaching Rome. The flourish of this document in the face of the French represen¬ tative was accompanied with an observation that France was not their only protector. Nor was the venerable Pontiff deficient in presence of 48 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES mind. Once during a great ceremony in St. Peter's at which Pius was himself officiating a man committed suicide in the basilica in a fit of religious excitement. He was carried out and at the first opportunity the unpleasant news was whispered to the Pope, who was seen to fold his hands, to say something in a low voice and then to cross himself. In that brief moment he had re-consecrated the Church. The Embassy at Berlin was, as it still is, an unattractive residence, acquired after the failure of the financier Strous- berg, who had built it on a valuable site in the Wilhelm Strasse. But our Chancery was at that time in the Pariser Platz, on the ground floor of the Bliicher Palais, almost under the shadow of the massive Brandenburg gate. The Austrian Embassy also had its Chancery on the ground floor, while the Ambassador, Count Szechenyi, occupied the first floor as his residence. Prince Bliicher, whom I learned to know afterwards, only kept two or three rooms for himself and let the remainder of the vast building, a procedure which was not popular in Berlin, as it was generally understood that he had been granted a loan from the Crown Trust at one and a half or two per cent, in order to build it, on the plea that if the great Silesian Nobles were to come to Berlin to live, as the old emperor desired, they must have suitable residences worthy of their name and position. Prince Bliicher, then a widower but subsequently twice remarried, was an amiable man in his eccentric way, but notorious for his closeness in money matters. When an income tax was eventually imposed he left his country for good and took up his residence in one of the smaller Channel Islands. A few days after my arrival the military Attache, Colonel, afterwards General, Sir Leopold Swaine, took me to the Neues Palais at Wildpark, near Potsdam, the summer residence of the Crown Prince Frederick. The Crown Princess invited members of our Embassy to play tennis there and remain to supper once or twice every week. This was my introduction to a long series of similar pleasant parties, at which all ceremony was dispensed with. Vivid still remains the im- BERLIN, 1884-1885 49 pression made upon me by the Crown Prince when for the first time I saw him approaching the tennis ground with his four Italian greyhounds, a splendid figure of dignified manhood, radiating kindliness with a friendly smile. One had only to see him to understand that his influence had been exerted, so far as his authority extended with his own army, on the side of humanity and in the defence of historic monuments during the war of '70. At supper, an unconven¬ tional meal, which began with curded milk and tea and went on to hot dishes and wine, I sat next to the Crown Princess and fell at once under the charm of one of the most cultivated women I have ever met, whose intelligent eyes had an irresistible appeal in them. The three unmarried daughters were present, and the simple natural intercourse of that happy family circle disarmed any shyness incidental to a first meeting. Free of address and inviting unrestricted discussion, the Crown Princess had nevertheless that uncon¬ scious habit of Royalty, the prerogative of always being right, as I was to learn without delay. She had been speaking of Marcus Aurelius, one of her enthusiasms, and expressed regret at having only read his works in translation and not in the original Latin. Not being as yet a courtier and only concerned with the truth, I did not hesitate to suggest that the imperial philosopher wrote in Greek, to which the Crown Princess rejoined that of course the original text was Greek, which she could never be expected to under¬ stand, but that she might have hoped to read a contempor- porary Latin version. My indiscretion was, however, not resented, and thus began an association which endured over many years. I little anticipated then the tragedy I was soon to witness and all the vicissitudes which were to bring me into such close relations with the royal hostess of Wild- park. After supper the Crown Prince talked to me for a long time about art and Italy, the country of his dreams and happy holidays. On some of these afternoons Prince William and his brother Prince Henry would appear. The latter was very E 50 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES popular with all our staff. The elder brother was less easy to know, though he displayed a somewhat boisterous geniality. It might gratify a certain mentality to be smitten from behind with a tennis racquet by a future emperor, but on the other hand such gratification was qualified by the fact that the blow could not be returned. More occasionally there were water parties on the lakes, where the Embassy maintained a four and a pair, and Prince William pulled a creditable stroke with one arm, the muscles of which were abnormally developed. The atrophied left arm was of little service, but with characteristic determination he had learned to make the right do the service of both. In the presence of his parents Prince William showed a certain constraint. He had been brought up in a rather severe atmosphere of domestic criticism and an observer could not help noticing that tension existed. In the con¬ cluding volume of Bismarck's autobiography there is a letter from the Crown Prince Frederick to the Chancellor, the publication of which was due to, but not justified by, the resentment of the latter towards the sovereign who had dismissed him. This personal letter, which refers to certain qualities of vanity and presumption and " an overweening estimation of himself " in the son, reveals that his relations with his father had not been altogether harmonious. Nor does the letter addressed to the Chancellor on November 29th, 1887, by Prince Wilhelm himself in which he prematurely discusses the attitude he should adopt towards the Princes of the German Empire in the not impossible eventuality of his father's death, convey a very pleasant impression. The ex-Emperor and his mother were in certain respects temperamentally too much alike ever to get on. She was an idealist, lacking in worldly wisdom, and therefore often indiscreet. The ex-Emperor was also an idealist, but his idealism was vitiated by a self-assurance which did not allow him to question the rightness of his own conclusions. Both were impetuous and impatient of opposition. Looking back to those old times when I knew him and saw BERLIN, 1884-1885 51 much of those who were in constant relations with him, I am confirmed in the view that, in accordance with a certain religious strain in his character, the ex-Emperor went through the greater part of his life firmly resolved to avoid war and seeing the best prospect of doing so in assuring the absolute military security of his country. For many years the dominant position which his ambition demanded for Germany was sought for in economic development. But the vanity which characterized his references to himself as the Supreme War Lord and the Admiral of the Atlantic played into the hands of those who wanted war, and who for years had been instilling into the German people the suggestion of their ultimate destiny as the arbiters of the world. Throughout, even though desiring peace, he gave every encouragement to those whose aim was war. You cannot continually sail too near the wind without being responsible for the consequences. With the steady increase of the Socialist vote the ascendancy over him of the war party increased in proportion. His own son openly declared for them, and a rivalry ensued which menaced the popularity of the sovereign among the very people whose support was indispensable to him. It would seem almost possible to indicate the precise moment when this change of mentality began. The Crown Prince's household was controlled by the competent Count Seckendorff, who had as a comparatively junior officer accompanied Lord Napier's expedition to Abyssinia in 1867. He was a most accomplished man, with a great knowledge of art, and a fair artist himself. His ascendancy in the household was often criticized in Germany. In any case he was a most loyal and devoted friend to his royal master and mistress in the days when friends were few, and through all the stormy vicissitudes of 1888, when his position was a very difficult one, he showed a wise and brave discretion. The even tenor of our relations with Germany was at this period beginning to be ruffled by the new ambitions 52 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES of Hamburg and Bremen for colonial expansion, ambitions which were warmly advocated in the country and which finally received the militant support of Bismarck. The question, which became acute in this year 1884, will be dealt with a little later on. A settlement of one of the first issues which arose out of the German occupation of Angra Pequena had just been concluded, and the German press was quoting the Cape newspapers as having expressed satisfaction. Lord Ampthill, who came up almost daily to Berlin, observed to me that little value could be attached to such quotations from the South African press. The Bismarckian method was to have articles written and get them inserted by such means as were open to him in the press of all nations. These articles were then quoted in German official papers as expressing the feeling of the country in which they had been published. The sixteen million thalers confiscated from the King of Hanover and devoted to Secret Service were freely used for such pur¬ poses. He had himself, he said, a rooted antipathy to the use of secret service funds, and did not believe in the trustworthiness of any information so obtained. This was indeed the tradition in the diplomatic service in my time. The Russians had an ingenious method of turning the anxious credulity of certain foreign representatives to account for the benefit of the State. It was Prince Bismarck himself who had explained to him their method. They kept a regular staff of officials whose business it was to allow themselves to be bought by foreign diplomatists. These officials were supplied with certain information which might be revealed without compromising any real interest, and they would meet foreign diplomatists by appointment in secret places with a great deal of mystery and " place the goods," to the great advantage of the management as well as of the state chest. At the same time the Russians were undoubtedly adepts themselves in obtaining possession of the most confidential documents. Herbert Bismarck told me that while he was BERLIN, 1884-1885 53 counsellor at the German Embassy at St. Petersburg a very high Russian official, in fact an Under Secretary of State, came to his Embassy and divulged a step which he said the Russian Government would shortly take. He made this disclosure because as a Russian patriot he was convinced that it was a most unfortunate measure and he was anxious or his country's sake to see it forestalled and rendered impracticable. It was in Germany's power to do so and the information was of great value to her. The Russian official observed : "I presume you will telegraph what I have told you to Berlin," and Herbert Bismarck replied he would certainly do so at once. " In that case," the Russian said, " I must beg you not to make use of ciphers a, b, c, or d," mentioning the numbers of four of their cipher books, " for we have all those, and as the information I have given you is at present only known to the Emperor, my chief and myself, if you use any of those it will be realized that I must have betrayed it." Incidentally thus Herbert Bismarck obtained two very valuable pieces of information at the same time. The friction which had arisen over Colonial issues made it difficult for the Ambassador to carry out a cure at Marien- bad, which had become an annual indispensable routine, and in the latter part of August he became seriously indis¬ posed. On the 25th a telegram from Potsdam informed us that the illness had taken a very grave turn, and a little later in the day another telegram announced the tragic news of his end. I have seldom witnessed such genuine demon¬ strations of feeling and sympathy as were aroused by the untimely death at fifty-four of this remarkable and wholly lovable man. The venerable Emperor, to whom Swaine broke the news, burst into tears, and said there was not one among his own personal officers whom he trusted or respected more. The Crown Prince, whom I received and accompanied to the coffin, exclaimed: "You do not know what this means for the Crown Princess and myself. We shall have to begin a new life now." The Ambassador's 54 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES home had been an oasis where they could escape from the artificialities of Court life and be simple human beings. Hatzfeldt, the Minister for Foreign Affairs, spoke of his death as an irreparable loss to Germany and recalled the efforts he had made to establish a good understanding. Count Szechenyi, the Austrian Ambassador, who had known him from boyhood, rushed back from Hungary, whither he had just gone for his holiday, in order to be present at the final leave-taking at Charlottenburg, when the body was sent back to England for burial. In the streets at Berlin I overheard men speaking of him with sympathy and regard. In those days international rivalry, so far as we were concerned, had not penetrated into the popular mind. World dominion or downfall had not yet become the watch¬ word, and there was no general ill-will to Great Britain, though the process of its fabrication was soon to begin. Before I left Berlin the University lectures of Treitschke with their malignant denunciations of the piratical British Empire were already drawing crowded audiences and his Catonic reiteration of Delenda est was instilling a tendentious poison. Lord Ampthill was succeeded by Sir Edward Malet, Minister in Brussels after his stormy experiences in Egypt. He arrived in October, 1884, and at once invited me to act as his private secretary. He was by far the youngest of our Ambassadors and had been born in the service, his father having also been a diplomatist. Bismarck had been intimate with the family at Frankfort in the days of the Bund in the 'fifties and had known Edward Malet as a boy. They had met again under strange circumstances during the campaign of 1870, when Malet had been left with one or two Secretaries in charge of the Embassy at Paris and the archives while Lord Lyons, the Ambassador, followed the French Government to Bordeaux. He had been instructed in September, 1870, to carry the letter through the German lines to Bismarck which eventually led to the celebrated interview between the Chancellor and M. Jules Favre at Ferrieres. His adventurous expedition from the BERLIN, 1884-1885 55 besieged city to the German headquarters is described in a very interesting pamphlet which was privately printed in the following year. Some ten days after Malet's arrival in Berlin the Chancellor came to see him. He did not on that occasion say much about political affairs. But he referred to the difficulties which had arisen over Colonial issues. He complained of our system which, he maintained, enabled two different departments like the Foreign Office and the Colonial Office to take divergent views, so that the language held by one Minister afforded no guarantee for the action of the other. But he admitted that the German people had taken the bit in their teeth and had gone beyond what he had believed to be opportune. This confirmed the view which Lord Ampthill had reported of Bismarck's own attitude towards Colonial expansion. Visits from the Chancellor were very exceptional and we young men had few opportunities of meeting the great man, who lived his own life and did exactly as he pleased. His health was not good, and his medical adviser, Schweniger, had compelled him to greatly simplify existence and indulge less in the strong meats and drinks which Prussians of the old school were apt to abuse. He seldom went out in the social world and on the only occasion on which he dined quite privately at the Embassy during my four years in Berlin, I was unfortunately absent on leave. My brother- in-law (General Stuart-Wortley) who was staying with the Malets at the time, told me that after dinner he sat down at the piano and entertained them by singing some old English ballads of the 'fifties. No doubt the excuse of indifferent health was useful to enable him to escape from the importunate., He once told Lord Ampthill that he had devised an infallible method for terminating a tedious official interview. When his wife thought that a visitor had been with him long enough she would look in at the door and remind him that the time had come to take his medicine. On that occasion he had hardly explained the 56 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES method when the Princess appeared bottle in hand, and Ampthill laughingly took the hint in spite of the Chancellor's protestations. Germany was entering a new phase of industrialism, and conditions were extremely interesting. The Emperor, whom I saw for the first time close at hand when the new Ambassa¬ dor was ceremoniously received for the presentation of his letters on October 24th, was a very old man, with the eyes sunken in their hollows, and evidently approaching the term of his long life. The big men who had made Germany politically in the latter half of the nineteenth century were still alive. Moltke was as old as the century. General Manteuffel, the Red Prince and the Crown Prince Frederick were the other surviving field-marshals of the war of '70. Ranke, Mommsen and Gregorovius were still active. Bis¬ marck was nearing the threescore years and ten. But his brain was not less vigorously constructive. The capital of the country was rapidly passing into the hands of a limited number of Jews of enormous wealth, as industry encroached upon the old agricultural interest. The Chancellor and those who followed him believed the remedy to lie in state- socialism. He would, he said, fight no more wars. He desired no further aggrandisement. The Germanic popula¬ tions of Russia and Austria were more useful to him under actual conditions, as an influence over those two empires, than they would be if absorbed into the German state. He appeared to believe in the possibility of building up a vast practical organization in which the state would become the great capitalist. But the Bismarckian system depended for success on a single masterful personality, rather than on essential principles, and tended to ignore the human element. The man who can dominate all the intelligence of a country for his own ends occurs but once in a century, and his very prepotency had withdrawn responsibility from all who might have become rivals, so that the ship of state would inevitably be without a helmsman of experience when he himself should disappear. BERLIN, 1884-1885 57 Sir Edward Malet, who had been brought up in the school of Lord Lyons, was for his juniors an ideal chief. The old Embassy stables were reconstructed to form offices, and the chancery was transferred thither from the Pariser Platz. He established a sort of club room for the bachelor members of the staff, who dined with him almost every night, and converted an old house which he leased from the Crown on one of the Potsdam lakes into comfortable summer quarters. Social life in Berlin still retained something of its old-world character. It took some little time to penetrate, but to us people were very cordial. The older generation used to assemble in a limited number of houses after dinner, where hostesses had fixed dates for weekly receptions. Such hospitality was regularly dispensed by the " three sisters " who played an important part in Berlin life, Countess Perponcher, Frau von Prillwitz and Countess Danckelmann. Grizzled generals whose names recalled the campaign of '70 would meet there, drink beer and eat caviare, sausages and other strong-tasting delicacies. Count Perponcher was the Oberhaus und Hofmarshal of the Court, a tall commanding figure who dyed his moustache and a few sparse locks, carried in a volute over his bald head, jet black, not without a certain dispersion of colour on the cranium. He was an elderly beau, with the deportment of a big gendarme and magnificent at the head of the Court processions with his white wand of office. There was a numerous group of Radziwils, whose social chief was Prince Antoine, the old Emperor's favourite A.D.C., the son of a lady for whom he was reported to have had a romantic attachment in youth. Princess Antoine, nee Castellane, considered her salon the most exclusive in Berlin, and it was her preliminary scrutiny that conceded or denied a social passport to the latest-joined attache. The only son had recently married a Polish Branicka and their hospitable house was the meeting place of the younger generation who rebelled against the old conventions. Russian legislation regarding the tenure of real property compelled them eventu- 58 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES ally to adopt Russian nationality. Princess George, a real bohemian by nature, most generous in good and evil fortune, the providence of her distressed compatriots, with whom she shared the remnants of her fortune in the evil days of the great war, has remained the constant friend of a lifetime. Prominent also among the Germans of Polish origin was Count Radolinski, who left the diplomatic service in 1884 to become Court Marshal to the Crown Prince. He belonged to the old Polish family of Koszutski which received the title of Count Radolin-Radolinski from Frederick William III in 1836. His first wife was an Englishwoman, but she was already dead when I came to Berlin. The Emperor Frederick on his accession made him a Prince, whereupon he dropped the second portion of the hyphenated name. After the Emperor Frederick's death he returned to the Diplomatic career and was successively Ambassador in Constantinople, Petersburg and Paris until 1910. There was the Duke and Duchess of Sagan, with one foot in France and one in Germany. She, wholly French by race and temperament, was the greatest of grandes dames in the capital, conscious of obligations and punctilious to fulfil them, with a sharp tongue and the kindliest of hearts. But in the country she dressed like a gamekeeper, slung a rifle over her shoulder and with half a dozen cigars in her pocket spent the day stalking roe-deer in the Silesian forests. Their daughter, the brilliant newly married Princess Carl Egon Furstenberg, now Countess Jean de Castellane, with the young Radziwils led the revolt against the old provincialism and the habit of dining at six. The regimental messes were still at half past four or five and the theatre began very early. The old Emperor himself dined at four. These French and Polish elements, with the sons of the great houses from all parts of Germany who officered the guard regiments, gave a certain cosmopolitan colour to social life, the most repre¬ sentative personalities in which, the Hatzfeldts, the Hohen- lohes, the Lichnowskis and the Henckel-Donnersmarcks were widely travelled, internationally connected and by no BERLIN, 1884-1885 59 means essentially Prussianized. The Silesian Count Guido Henckel von Donnersmarck had in fact in liis younger days been less well known in Germany than in Paris, where he compromised his magnificent estate. Its reconstruction and his eventual great wealth were largely due to the influence and ability of Madame de Paiva, famous under the Second Empire, whom he married. His second wife was a Russian, beautiful and much too unconventional for the Berlin of the 'eighties, whose friendship I greatly appre¬ ciated. The older generation of Brandenburgers somewhat mistrusted and disapproved of the greater freedom of life and manners introduced by the younger element. Count Hatzfeldt, the former Ambassador in Turkey, and subsequently Ambassador in London, presided over the Foreign Office in the Wilhelm Strasse. He was a good tennis player, and had seldom missed his daily game at Constantinople where two or three of our staff had been posted. So in Berlin we used to play with him two or three times a week in the garden of his official residence. As we had then no ground of our own we greatly appreciated the privilege, and I am sure business did not suffer from our intimacy with the Foreign Secretary, who had a much wider outlook than the average official. So far as his influence went—for, in the last resort, the Chancellor was his own Foreign Minister—it was friendly and, if later in London he sometimes had to navigate in difficult seas, the storm was not of his making, and he poured such oil on the waters as he could. We saw much of the younger officers of the guards, and especially of those of the Lifeguards, recruited from all parts of Germany. Among those with whom we most foregathered were Prince Henry of Battenberg, Count Miinster, the Sierstorpff brothers and Baron Reischach. They made us members of their clubs and showed the most friendly hospitality to the British who were in those days regarded as nationally related. Of the elder officers we saw naturally much less, though, perhaps owing to his 60 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES haying an American wife, I found myself not unfrequently in the Company of the ambitious but evangelical Waldersee, who allied himself with the political Court Chaplain Stocker, and exercised a considerable influence during the first year of the reign of William II. The caste system was still very strong. Only once in my four years at Berlin, and that at a party given by the Crown Prince and Princess, did I meet any number of the learned and professional class in contact with the social aristocracy. The old Brandenburg nobility had no touch with the great historians and men of letters who were then still alive. Nor had commerce, industry and finance as yet found a way into the reception rooms of privilege. A certain number of excellencies would indeed attend the gargantuan banquets offered by the great banker Bleichroder, then our consul-general, but his son could get no further in the army than to become a reserve officer in the infantry of the guards, and regimental feeling in that corps was adamantine against the reception of any elements but those of the territorial aristocracy. It was only at the palace of the heir-apparent, where love of art, a real sympathy with the intellectual movement and a wider liberal outlook on life prevailed, that it was possible occasionally to meet authors and artists, or in the house of such a broad-minded frondeur as George von Bunsen, who was himself somewhat of an outlaw, in consequence of his earnest opposition to the Chancellor's internal policy. I nevertheless managed to find my way into the social life which they maintained among themselves, thanks largely to the friendly courtesies of Dr. Lippmann, the keeper of the prints and drawings at the Museum, a master in his own faculty. I well remember a most interesting evening which I spent somewhat later in company with Sir William Rich¬ mond at his hospitable house. There were present at dinner Theodor Mommsen, the historian, Bamberger, the radical deputy, Dr. Bode, the critic, Baron Richthofen, the geologist and Chinese traveller, Director Dohme, Dr. BERLIN, 1884-1885 61 Franckel and others. Bamberger I knew already, a delightful talker and a great authority on French literature. Mommsen, however, I then saw for the first time. The head was strikingly remarkable, the nose sharp, prominent and inquisitive, the chin small but strong, the mouth excessively mobile and excitable. But all these features were dominated by a great calm dome-like forehead, framed in long grey hair. There was a certain likeness in the nose and brows to the portraits of Voltaire, but Mommsen's mobile mouth was not underhung. He had a soft pleasant voice, which could grow harsh and strident when he was roused. Then his dark eyes flashed and his sharp nose seemed to stab his contradictor. He had reached his seventieth birthday only a few days before, and had had seventeen children, of whom fifteen were still alive. His vitality was extraordinary. He went to bed fairly late and always rose at four. That evening he was particularly genial and gracious, correcting with a pretty manner some of my modes of expression in German, in which we chiefly conversed. But he had a reputation for extreme quickness and pugnacity in discussion and could be nothing less than offensive to those he disliked. The story was current that on the one occasion on which he met Gregorovius, the author of The City of Rome in the Middle Ages, of whose work he had no opinion, he observed to him : " You, Herr Gregoro¬ vius, have lived, I believe, a long time in Rome. Now a history of Rome in the Middle Ages, that would be a fine book to undertake." Notwithstanding that they had much in common in the exaltation of force over right, the name of Mommsen had always been like a red rag to the Chancellor, and we endeavoured to elicit from him how far he recipro¬ cated this antagonism. Mommsen expressed his approval of Bismarck's foreign policy, but denounced his social system, his ban on the mixing of classes and insistence on the segregation of the military element as an exclusive caste. Probably Bismarck knew his own country best, and felt that as yet its tenure was too precarious in Europe, 62 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES and that the people were not yet ripe for the free intercourse and unrestricted exchanges of view between class and class to which we are accustomed. The masses in Berlin still struck the foreigner as lacking any natural independence. Unless instructed by the police to walk on one side or the other of the way they would shuffle all over the pavement, and did not fall instinctively into two streams as our people do. The nation was accustomed to and looked for guidance still. The party that evening for the most part belonged to the opposition and were in advance of the times. Fran- ckel mistrusted Bismarck's economic theories or practice. All the chances of the German Empire were calculated on success. He trembled to think of what might happen if a national crisis suspended activities for a year. They were in fact always sailing too near the wind and neglected to realize that in human affairs things have their ups and downs. Both Director Dohme and Bamberger severely criticized the German educational system, which, the former said, was lacking in originality. The German copied well, but whereas we improved on old models he only vulgarized them when he tried to do more than copy. The race was a magnificent one for breeding purposes when crossed ; kept pure it was the most loutish on earth. In Prussia the intermixture with the Slavs had produced an energetic people. The Germanic stock in Lombardy, in France and in England, mixed with the Celtic or other elements, had bred races full of vitality, but it remained heavy and unin¬ telligent in those regions where ethnologists had identified an unadulterated inbred German population. Outside the highest society, which as I have said tended to be cosmopo¬ litan in Berlin, women played a small part and contented themselves with household duties, which they discussed over their coffee in the afternoon, leaving it to their husbands to take part alone in social intercourse. The wives were self-effacing, and in every detail of life it was the man's comfort and amusement which received consideration. A friend of mine once found himself travelling in the same BERLIN, 1884-1885 63 compartment with a young German professor, who was very communicative and in boisterously high spirits. He explained that he was embarking on a journey to which he had for a long time been looking forward and he added : " The fact is I have just been married and am on my honey¬ moon."—" On your honeymoon ? " said my friend looking at him interrogatively ; " But where then is ! " " Ah ! " replied the professor, " My wife ? She is not with me, fur zwei hat das Geld nicht ausgereicht(It did not run to both of us travelling.) The first African Conference, which would have to deter¬ mine the status of the International Congo State and many other issues, was to meet in Berlin in the middle of November, 1884. This will therefore be an appropriate place to put on record some of the antecedents of that important gathering which directly affected our relations with Germany. The earliest indication of any deliberate German intention to found a colony overseas which came under my personal experience had been a note received at the Foreign Office from the German Embassy in November, 1883, which passed through my hands for preliminary treatment while I was serving in that Department. It set forth the desire of a commercial house at Bremen to establish a trading station on the Bay of Angra Pequena, which is some 280 miles south of Walfisch Bay, and the inquiry was advanced with all due forms of courtesy whether the contemplated step would be in any way unwelcome to Her Majesty's Government. So far as my recollection goes, the tone of the note was studiously courteous. Having affixed to it the brief summary which was known as the docket, I took it to the head of the Western Department and observed that it appeared to me to be one of the most important com¬ munications which had come under my cognizance at the Foreign Office. It did not seem to make any great impres¬ sion on my immediate official superiors, and possibly this attitude of poco-curantism was in some measure due to 64 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES Lord Ampthill's reports, which nothing had occurred to modify since the colonial question had first been discussed in 1873, when Prince Bismarck declared himself antagonistic to such adventures. The reply to this note was that British sovereignty had only been actually proclaimed at certain points such as Walfisch Bay, but that our legitimate rights would be infringed by sovereign claims between the southern point of Portuguese territory and the frontier of Cape Colony. The German Government were not satisfied with this answer and inquired in December, 1883, on what grounds our claim was based, and what means we possessed of protecting German enterprise in these regions. The Colonial Office transmitted this correspondence to the Cape Government for their views. Before it could arrive, or at any rate be considered, there was a Ministerial crisis at the Cape and many months were allowed to elapse without any notice being taken of the German communication. Now the Chancellor was at this time contemplating new and extended financial demands on the Imperial Diet, in which there were many ardent supporters of the colonial party in Hamburg and, however distasteful the dictation of that assembly might be to his autocratic temperament, those interests had to be conciliated. The constitution of the Reichstag, against which Bismarck used frequently to inveigh in his conversations with my chief, had been one of his admitted political miscalculations. He had made up his mind that under the empire the German Princes would still remain particularist, and he had therefore recommended universal suffrage in elections for the Diet, believing that the mass of the people, favourable to imperial union, would act as a counterpoise. Experience, however, showed that while the Princes rallied loyally to the new order, the weapon which he had devised to neutralize their anticipated opposition was constantly directed against himself. If the delay in replying to the German note regarding Angra Pequena until the month of June, 1884, appeared formally to put us in the wrong, experience showed that BERLIN, 1884-1885 65 the inquiries addressed to H.M. Government were themselves ex jjost facto, and it is improbable that even if an immediate answer had been forthcoming the result would have been in any way different. An expedition under Herr Liideritz, of Bremen, had in fact landed at Angra Pequena early in 1883. He had on May 1st of that year signed a treaty with a native chief by which he obtained a sea frontage of ten miles with an inland area of some two hundred, over which the sovereign rights were ceded. When in June, 1884, the Cape Government were aroused to the gravity of the issue and signified their readiness to take over the territory and the responsibilities of Government, it was too late, and Bismarck affirmed that his only object had been to elicit a clear statement from us whether or no we had any prior claim to that area. He could not admit the establishment on our part of a Monroe doctrine for Africa. If Angra Pequena served as a sort of test case for the establishment of a first footing in Africa it was an unprofit¬ able venture. Bleichroder, the banker, afterwards admitted that it had cost him £10,000. Liideritz had found the place altogether worthless, and did not intend to sink any capital there. The Chancellor had learned that he contemplated offering to sell it to us and, after all the trouble which the settlement had caused him, he was furious. So Bleichroder had to advance the money to keep the little colony going and save Bismarck from a ridiculous position. The decision of the British Government to recognize German sovereignty over the territory appeared at the moment to have re¬ established cordial relations.1 But a similar course to that followed at Angra Pequena was only anticipated at St. Lucia Bay by the timely hoisting of the British flag, and intrigues carried on not very skilfully through Gerhard Rohlfs to create a grievance against the Sultan of Zanzibar did not escape the vigilance of Sir John Kirk, our Consul 1 The rise and development of the Colonial conflict with Germany at this time may be studied in the second volume of the Life of Lord Granville, by Lord Edmond Fitzmaurico, F 66 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES General, who was later to be sacrificed to the maintenance of the understanding with Germany. Assurances given in April, 1884, that a journey of Dr. Nachtigal in West Africa had exclusively scientific and commercial objects in view did not prevent that energetic officer from making a series of annexations. The methods by which a footing was obtained in the Cameroons, after its inhabitants had peti¬ tioned for British protection and the intention to accord it had been publicly announced ; the preliminaries to the hoisting of the German flag in New Guinea ; the pretensions advanced in Samoa ; and the questionable procedure followed in dispossessing the Sultan of Zanzibar of his mainland possessions, were further measures which revealed an aggressive disregard for British susceptibilities and were characterized by a want of frankness, which the relations ostensibly existing between the two countries did not warrant. A worse act of calculated bad faith was yet to follow. It would seem legitimate to assume that Bismarck was at the outset genuinely indisposed to encourage Colonial enterprise, and that when he so informed Lord Ampthill he was expressing a sincere conviction. But the time came when he realized that he could no longer oppose the strong current in influential quarters in favour of the establish¬ ments of outposts in undeveloped lands. He, however, gave Lord Ampthill no warning of such a change of attitude and he never made any real effort to arrive at an amicable understanding with us. Circumstances offered him an opportunity of placing Great Britain at a disadvantage. We had only recently occupied Egypt, where the growing trouble in the Soudan had added to our embarrassments. The support of Germany, which had given us every encour¬ agement to go there, would at this critical stage have been invaluable, but the competition for colonial expansion suggested that advantage might be derived from becoming rather the ally of France in Egypt. We had also a trouble¬ some situation to face in Central Asia, owing to Russian hostility, which there was every reason to believe Germany BERLIN, 1884-1885 67 was secretly promoting. To assume the part of the unappre¬ ciated friend, reluctantly compelled to fend for himself, appeared a more congenial policy than that of making frank overtures to a Gladstonian Government which Bis¬ marck cordially disliked, especially after the first test case had proved successful. Mr. Gladstone was old and out of health, and he appeared to regard these issues as of secondary importance. Neither Lord Granville nor Lord Derby stood out against him with any insistence, and they were reluc¬ tantly compelled to acquiesce in a series of compromises and concessions, which invariably encouraged fresh demands. The self-complacent confessions of Moritz Busch reveal how at this period he was employed to write a number of attacks on Great Britain in the Grenzboten, of which Ireland, Afghanistan, India, the Boers and South Africa formed the subject matter. An administration which had proved easy to squeeze would no doubt be seriously concerned to find the German press not less hostile than the French. Of all the methods of Bismarckian diplomacy employed at this time none was more discreditable than the deliberate deception practised not only on the British but also on the German public by the White Book on Colonial questions which was issued in the beginning of 1885. It opened with a despatch, dated the 5th of May, 1884, addressed to Count Minister, the German Ambassador in London, with instruc¬ tions to communicate its contents to the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs. The despatch, while preferring certain inquiries, contained an exposition of Germany's aims and expressed the desire to make them consistent with British interests and generally to work in harmony with us. The friction which ensued as exhibited in subsequent docu¬ ments was adroitly made to appear as the result of the difficulty experienced in eliciting any reply and the ignoring by the British Government of the friendly overture thus made. Now this despatch was never communicated to the British Secretary for Foreign Affairs, who learned of its existence for the first time from the publication of the text 68 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES in the White Book. It was indeed actually sent to Count Miinster, as he subsequently admitted, but he received simultaneously telegraphic instructions not to act upon it. The despatch was nevertheless used as the text on which the sermon preached by the White Book was based. It was with consternation that we realized at the Embassy the device to which the Chancellor had had recourse and received the wholly unacceptable explanation that its publication must have been due to a slip of memory. At home Lord Granville wrote a letter to Lord E. Fitzmaurice, the Under- Secretary of State, to be read in reply to a question in Parliament put by Mr. Labouchere, which made it clear that he had never received and had no knowledge of Prince Bismarck's despatch of May 5th, 1884. He could not, however, mention what he already then knew, that Count Miinster had been deliberately instructed not to communi¬ cate it. The Ambassador's confidence could not be betrayed; he would at once have been sacrificed, as indeed he was in any case six months later in July, and transferred to Paris. Mr. Gladstone was determined to avoid a crisis with Germany at all costs, and so we pocketed the affront. Nor was it possible under these circumstances to offer a word in explanation or defence of our policy at Berlin, where we felt profoundly humiliated. For many years I was bound by the rules of official secrecy to maintain absolute silence regarding this significant episode. But eventually the story was published in the Life of Lord Granville, by Lord E. Fitzmaurice, and so became public property long after the interest of actuality had gone by. To this episode and the experience thereby gained that Great Britain could swallow such an unqualifiable proceeding without expostulation, may be perhaps traced back the long series of discourteous and ungracious acts which the German Government permitted themselves towards Great Britain. Experience had shown that we could be confronted with a fait accompli which, if no vital interest was involved, would be accepted without a protest. I do not suggest BERLIN, 1884-1885 69 that such was Bismarck's own intention. The Chancellor had never abandoned the hope of a British alliance, and after several tentative soundings he in 1887 actually ap¬ proached Lord Salisbury privately but directly with such a proposition. But Bismarck was so convinced of the impossibility of any understanding between Great Britain and either France or Russia, that he felt an eventual under¬ standing with us would not be compromised by such un¬ gracious proceedings to suit his more immediate ends. Lesser men who had taken note of the tolerance or indif¬ ference we had displayed, and of our spirit of accommodation to German demands, repeated similar manoeuvres. To make this policy more efficacious they encouraged an anti- British atmosphere in Germany. The Press responded with exaggeration and at last the flood grew beyond their con¬ trol. A long period went by before the slow-working British mind, by nature unsuspicious and unobservant of continental developments, was aroused by the many provo¬ cations received. The goodwill of the British which existed in my younger days was uselessly and wantonly alienated by Germany, which was hypnotized into regarding an England which had not consciously done her any evil turn as the real enemy of the Fatherland. The vigilance which Great Britain had or should have exercised over the ultimate destiny of these unoccupied regions was, in the majority of cases to which I have referred, not directed against Germany, and, in view of the British attitude at that period towards expansion in Africa, there appears no reason to assume that the German Government might not have arrived at a friendly understanding with us for the realization of such projects without creating permanent mistrust of Teutonic methods and professions. The hostility of German policy towards Great Britain only became apparent to the general public a great many years afterwards by the transmission of the Emperor's telegram to President Kriiger. But the conduct of the German Government in a long series of colonial issues was from this 70 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES time forward constantly and at times even contemptuously aggressive towards us. It is possible that an atmosphere of prepotency and the overbearing manner of German officials which had grown up under the Bismarckian system had so far established a habit that those in power were incapable of appreciating how insupportable this attitude became in international relations. Had not the real history of many of these incidents been concealed from the public in Great Britain for reasons of policy, opinion would long have reached the point where patience boils over, the more so as each successive settlement appeared to be only the prelude to a new issue. Bismarck himself had no doubt a definite object in view and, realizing that our essential difficulties were at this time rather with France, aimed at bullying Great Britain into friendship and support of Germany. He had himself perhaps perceived that his policy had been a mistaken one at the time when he withdrew from public life. But it is difficult to break away from a political tradition once established, and his less capable successors seem to have accepted it as a legacy. The adoption as a definite policy of the brow¬ beating of Great Britain and the repudiation of her efforts to re-establish more cordial relations led to a new orientation and ended as it could only end in permanent alienation, of which Germany witnessed the first results at Algeciras and experienced the sinister consequences in 1914. This examination of the " present discontents " in 1884-5 has carried me beyond the date of the Assembly of the first African Conference. In 1876 the International African Association had been formed under the segis of King Leopold at Brussels to develop the Congo territories. The claim raised to the river by Portugal had been considered valid by Great Britain. Germany, however, declined to recognize the Anglo-Portuguese treaty of February 26th, 1884, rela¬ tive to the Congo. The great scheme of the King of the Belgians for the administration and development of the river basin offered an alternative policy. A considerable BERLIN, 1884-1885 71 measure of public support had already been accorded to a project which was heralded as having a philanthropic character, and Great Britain was at that time ready to co-operate in such a solution and thus to prevent that river from becoming entirely French, which experience had shown to mean the exclusion of British commerce. She was at the same time anxious to secure a certain measure of inter¬ national control over the vast area embraced by its water¬ shed. The future destiny of the Congo basin was osten¬ sibly the main plea for the German proposal to hold a con¬ ference at Berlin on African questions. But all outstanding issues both on the Eastern and the Western side and the principles of partition of undeveloped regions were to be included in its scope. The conference, at which our delegates had no clerical staff to assist them—there were of course no typewriters in those days—added enormously to the work of the Embassy, and I have seldom experienced a more strenuous period than the three months during which it sat. The discussions and their result are fully recorded in the protocols and the General Act, which defined the International Basin of the Congo and the regime to be observed therein. I do not therefore propose to comment here upon an instrument which was subsequently amplified by the Conference and General Act of Brussels. It may, however, be pertinent to mention that no sooner had the conference opened in Berlin than Dr. Peters, Count Pfeil and Dr. Jiihlke slipped across from Zanzibar to the African mainland, disguised as mechanics, with a large consignment of German flags for distribution, and began to obtain the signatures or seals of a number of petty chiefs to blank treaty forms which they had brought with them. The first meeting took place on November 15th. We were represented by the Ambassador, assisted by Sir Percy Anderson for the Foreign Office, Sir Robert Meade for the Colonial Office, Sir Joseph Archer Crowe as commercial expert and Sir Travers Twiss as our leading authority on 72 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES international law. H. M. Stanley, the traveller, attended on behalf of the King of the Belgians. On the morning of the 15th Malet had an interview with the Chancellor, who made certain significant observations intended to prepare the ground and bid for our support. He said that any undue pressure exercised on France by Germany might result in war again, and he was therefore resolved not to use any. French susceptibilities regarding Egypt were great. He admitted, however, that he had only shown his teeth in Egypt because we had, as he alleged, behaved badly in Colonial questions. He had always felt certain in old times that if England did not stand with Germany she would at any rate not help France in the event of war. But since Gladstone's Midlothian attack on Austria and Germany, before he won the elections and was returned to office, he no longer felt so sure. Germany could beat France again as she had done before if the latter was alone without allies. But if France secured allies the position would be serious. Should Great Britain join with France, only France would suffer. Germany could not touch us. We should sweep the seas and France would be punished for all our misdeeds. " However," he added, " we really mean to be friends." The anxiety of Bismarck to secure the isolation of France made the maintenance of cordial rela¬ tions with Russia the unalterable basis of his foreign policy, and in those days the intimacy of the German and Russian Emperors was emphasized by the exchange of special military representatives, directly accredited to the person of the sovereigns. Sir Joseph Crowe was not only the commercial attache for Northern Europe, but in my eyes he had the still greater merit of being, in collaboration with his friend Cavalcaselle, the eminent historian of Art. He told me that his early ambition was to be a painter, but as his brother (Eyre Crowe) had already adopted that profession, his father suggested that he should rather devote himself to the literature of painting. He had already so far trained himself as to be BERLIN, 1884-1885 73 familiar with technical methods, and in preparing himself for his task he made upwards of 10,000 drawings and tracings from pictures and sketches of the old masters, including all those of Raphael still extant. The first serious work which he undertook was a life of van Eyck. His studies led him to travel in the Low Countries and he went on to Germany in 1847. In the diligence which was con¬ veying him from Hanover to Berlin, whose Museum possessed half the panels of the Adoration of the Lamb, he conversed with and took a fancy to a young Italian, whose name was Cavalcaselle. The day after their arrival in Berlin they met in the gallery and finding that they had both come with the same object in view they spent many pleasant days together, and then each went his own way. In 1849 Crowe was cross¬ ing the Place de la Victoire at Paris in the dusk, when a young man, practically in rags and looking the picture of misery, saluted him. It was Cavalcaselle. He had fought with Garibaldi in the defence of Rome and had been sent to France as a prisoner. His patrimony had been confiscated and he was penniless. Crowe took charge of him and helped him to get to England, where he worked as an artist. Even¬ tually his property was restored to him and he went home. Thus began an acquaintance which led to their famous historico-critical collaboration. Their identity of judgment in attributions of authorship was, Crowe told me, remarkable and even surprising to themselves, in illustration of which he related to me one of their apparent divergencies of view which proved after all to be only a confirmation of the similarity of their deductions or intuitions. There are many galleries which claim to have Raphael's Madonna di Loreto, but the pictures so catalogued are all copies and most of them indifferent. They had for years been hunting in vain for the original. On his way to see Cavalcaselle with a view to the preparation of a new edition Crowe had stopped at Bologna, and in a small private collection he found what he had so long been in search of. The picture was, however, so dilapidated and repainted 74 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES that it would have been unidentifiable had he not detected in a few square inches of the surface the brush-marks peculiar to Raphael of which he had made a special study. Full of excitement he rushed to see Cavalcaselle and an¬ nounced the discovery which he had made at Bologna. His colleague replied that he feared Crowe must be mistaken, for he too had not long before detected the hand of Raphael in a similar picture at Verona. Each adhered firmly to his own opinion and Cavalcaselle engaged him on his homeward journey to stop at Verona, providing him with a letter to the owner. Armed with this introduction he duly presented himself and asked to see the picture. " I regret," said the collector, "to be unable to show it you, for since Signor Cavalcaselle saw it, it has been sold and is now in the house of Signor at Bologna." They had both seen the same picture in two different places and had formed identical conclusions. I asked why this discovery had never been proclaimed. He said that only a minute portion remained of the original painting ; no one would have credited the attribution to Raphael of a picture presenting so deplorable an appearance, and it would only have damaged their reputation as critics to announce it. They had not, he told me, in their monumental work aimed at being interesting, but had endeavoured to establish a solid basis on which future historians of art might work. These and many other interesting conversations with the father of my old friend, Sir Eyre Crowe, relieved the monotony of ciphering and deciphering interminable telegrams on the subject of the prohibition of the arms and alcohol traffic in Africa, and they remain a pleasant memory of those days of high pressure. Sir Joseph Crowe had such a high standard of the obligations of a critic of art, the disinterestedness of whose judgments must remain above suspicion, that, in spite of innumerable opportunities, he never bought a picture. Much less could he have conceived the idea of selling one. Percy Anderson, for many years head of the African Department in the Foreign Office, had a peculiar humour of BERLIN, 1884-1885 75 his own and was very popular with the staff of the Embassy. His stories of bygone days in Downing Street, some of which I had already heard from Lord Ampthill, made us feel how much more serious our generation had already become, genial in camaraderie as it was compared with its present day successors. In those days all clerical work was done by attaches and junior secretaries, and the latest joined were consigned to a department known as the Nursery, to learn their business under the jovial leadership of the famous amateur harlequin John Bidwell. The latter was reported one day in old Bond Street, arrayed in frock-coat and tall hat, to have taken a flying header through a four-wheel cab with open windows containing two elderly ladies, alighting on his hands in the middle of the road to land with a somersault on to the opposite pavement. It was when Lord Palmerston was Secretary of State and Albert Smith's ascent of Mont Blanc was engrossing public attention that Bidwell one day proposed an alpine expedition in the Nursery. The archive presses were accordingly piled in the middle of the largest room. The members of the department were securely roped together with red tape, and using rulers for alpenstocks with Bidwell as guide they proceeded to mount from chair to table, from table to register desk, and thence to negotiate the loftiest summits of the presses. Their leader was engaged in giving a graphic description of the surrounding peaks when he suddenly disappeared down a crevasse between two of the presses. At that moment the door was opened, and the Under-Secretary appeared to ask for a paper. The result was a report to the Secretary of State. But it was through Lady Palmerston that the reprimand was conveyed. And yet never did the Foreign Office command more respect on the Continent than in those days, and never was a Minister more prepotent. Travers Twiss was by far the senior of the party in years, not far short at that time of seventy. He had been a good deal in Germany and intimate in his youth with the Met- ternichs of Johannisberg. An incident which he related to 76 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES us reminded me of the Saturnalia of the Rhineland nobles of Grand Cru in Vivian Grey. He was staying at Johannisberg during a great family festival when the chiefs of the house were assembled, and the cellars, where the noblest vintages of that golden nectar reserved for the family were stored, had been ransacked for the banquet. " We began," he said, " with the wine of 1717 and drank through the century." This must have taken place between 1830 and 1840 as he was quite a young man at the time. At the end of a long evening his head remained perfectly clear, but his legs were no longer under complete control. His legal habit of mind led him always to demand precise definitions, and the eternal " what is " of Sir Travers provoked the humour of the juniors. The whole party dined on most evenings with the Ambas¬ sador. One night the arrival of the cigarettes brought up the question of when lucifer matches were invented, which was referred to him as the oldest inhabitant. The inevitable " Ah, what is a lucifer match ? " opened up a long discussion. After it had continued sufficiently long Sir Edward proposed that the party should resume the discussion at dinner the following night, and added : " Sir Travers, will you join us again to-morrow ? " When the veteran jurist replied: " Well, what is to-morrow ? " it was too much for our gravity. Solvuntur risu tabulae. Stanley was somewhat of an enigma to us all. He had come to represent the interests of the King of the Belgians. His stories of experiences in Central Africa were told in simple incisive language and had a very dramatic quality. He spoke with real affection of the natives and of what he believed might be made of them. I liked his relation of the single combats, with their Homeric quality of preliminary speech and denunciation. As he said, " it takes all day there to kill a man." The warriors would look round the corners of their enormous shields and harangue one another ; " A precious villain you are ; if you want my opinion it is that you are quite unnecessary to the world, and best removed from it." And so on. Not unfrequently, he said, BERLIN, 1884-1885 77 he had been invited to arbitrate. It was not difficult to make peace, but you had to demand a big fee and represent it as a serious matter to compose such a grave issue. When the award was given war would be buried with much cere¬ mony. I liked Stanley at Berlin, but years afterwards in East Africa I found his name was not one to conjure with among the British. His journeys were regarded as having been conceived rather in a journalistic spirit of self-adver¬ tisement, and his travelling companions hardly ever remained his friends. The pioneer life of those days in Africa, per¬ petual discomfort, privation and often physical suffering made men lose their " sense of proportion," and the absence of any restraining authority swelled their sense of self- importance. After reading Stanley on Tippoo Tib, it was interesting afterwards to hear Tippoo Tib on Stanley. Whatever Livingstone may have felt when he was eventually " found," the general impression in East Africa was that Emin, whose rescue by Stanley the conscience of the Anglo- Saxon race had been induced to demand, did not parti¬ cularly appreciate being saved and restored to a civilization of which he had lost the habit. After a few days' interval at Christmas time, during which our delegates returned home, the Conference was resumed on the 5th of January. The German claims had been discussed, and Mr. Gladstone would not entertain the idea of absorbing the coast-line between our South African settlements and the Portuguese frontier. He held that the Germans would make fair colonists and acceptable neighbours. But, if we had no intention of resisting, we might at least have made our concessions graciously. As it was we did neither, and only caused irritation, with the result that the German White Book above referred to appeared and we submitted to an affront which was passed over without a protest. The German people were themselves misled by its contents and relations became anything but friendly. Count Herbert Bismarck was then sent on a special mission to London with the object no doubt of removing irritation, It was matter 78 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES for speculation how far the anti-British campaign had been worked up in order to divert criticism from an extremely unpopular measure introduced at this time which trebled the existing duty on corn. The African Conference con¬ cluded its, on the whole, satisfactory labours with the signature of the General Act. The International African Association became an independent State, the " Congo Free State " ; trade in the conventional basin being declared free, while the navigation of the river was placed under international control. Somewhat similar provisions were laid down for the Niger under French and British protection, and it was established that occupations on the coast must be effective in order to be valid. Bismarck had said he could not admit that the fact that Vasco di Gama had once landed at a particular spot in Africa constituted an inde¬ feasible claim to possession. On the 26th of February I left for Paris and London with the Ambassador, who was about to be married to Lady Ermyntrude Russell. The Chancellor, who had not suc¬ ceeded in obtaining all that German chauvinists desired by the African Conference, was in very low spirits and, at a farewell interview with Malet, said that the future outlook for Germany profoundly depressed him. He would retire when his Emperor passed away, being himself too old to serve a new master. What he would prefer would be that some anarchist would shoot him when the Emperor died. He no doubt foresaw the difficulties which the succession would eventually entail. He would have done much to win the goodwill of the Crown Princess. But she was irreconcilable and in spite of her great ability and almost more than ability, could not conquer certain prejudices or realize when to give way. I was enchanted to escape even for a short time from the Court Balls, which recurred at regular intervals between the New Year and Lent, and from all this ceremonial of the Berlin season. As in the summer the staff of our Embassy were continually summoned to Wildpark for tennis, so in BERLIN, 1884-1885 79 the winter when the ponds in the Thiergarten froze we were invited to skate with the Crown Princess and her daughters. Etiquette still prescribed that in the presence of the Court we should wear the conventional silk hat and frock-coat. This costume was hardly an appropriate one in which to play hockey, and the hats at least were left on a seat and replaced with fur caps. I looked forward with some dread to these afternoons, as the Crown Princess was not a very strong skater and on the ice my services were generally enlisted to lend a supporting hand. Fortunately for me no disaster had occurred before a thaw set in, and then we left for England. As a pageant a ball in the White Hall at the palace was well worth seeing for the first time. But when the novelty was over attendance, from which there was no escape, became an unwelcome corvee. It entailed standing up for four hours in a hot uniform, which on those occasions we wore with white trousers, instead of full-dress knee-breeches, which were apparently regarded in Berlin as revealing too much of the human form, or as reminiscent of livery. All the officers of the General Staff, a very numerous body, and all those attached to the Army Corps of Guards, distributed between Berlin, Potsdam and Spandau, were commanded to be present. They did not, unless of field rank, enter the ball¬ room until after the conclusion of the royal cercle, but filled the ante-rooms and the long gallery through which we passed. The Ambassadors were expected to arrive in the old-fashioned state-coaches, which rocked like a Channel steamer and entailed the maintenance or the hiring of very big horses. The blaze of colour was dazzling, almost the only black coats in the vast throng being those of the American Embassy. By half-past eight we had to be in our places in a great ring, in which the very numerous diplomatic body was arranged according to the priority of appointment of the respective heads of missions. A signal was given to the Lifeguards' band in the gallery ,and then the royal procession filed in, headed by the magnificent Perponcher, supported by the 80 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES household officials and a number of pages in red. Then came the Emperor, the Crown Prince and Princess, and all the Junior Princes and Princesses at the time in the capital. The Emperor, followed by the Crown Prince and Crown Princess, passed round the ring, addressed a few words to each foreign representative and received presentations. The Empress Augusta was too infirm to take part in this cere¬ mony. When the tour was completed the hundreds of junior officers, who during the previous weeks had spent their leisure competing for the privilege of engaging the proportionately few young ladies available as partners, crowded into the White Hall. Thereupon the Vortanzer, a captain appointed with true German method on account of his proved competence to lead the dancing, gave the signal to the band for the opening royal quadrille. Revers¬ ing was strictly tabooed. In those days the leader was Rittmeister von Reischach, resplendent in the scarlet-coated gala uniform of the Gardes du Corps. He afterwards entered the household of the Crown Prince and eventually became Master of the Horse to the ex-emperor William. The great war has severed old friendships and inspired antagonisms and prejudices from which we of the older generation can hardly dissociate ourselves. But I should like here to testify to my sincere regard for that very gallant Suabian gentleman, who was not only a constant and loyal friend to our country¬ men, but who on one occasion in a moment of some diffi¬ culty took up the gauntlet on behalf of a British acquaintance with a chivalry which I have always honoured and admired. It is one of the many tragedies of war that a whole nation is judged by its opponents in the terms of its least worthy members, and collectively associated with actions which the better elements of that nation sincerely deplore. A cruel and inexorable strain in the Prussian character to some extent infected the whole of Germany after the phenomenal successes of the Bismarckian era, and the plea that the necessity of the State could justify the repudiation of honourable engagements and the violation of established BERLIN, 1884-1885 81 international or humanitarian precedents had distorted the mentality and judgment of the nation. But Prussia is not Germany, and I rather choose to believe after an experience of many years that the old friends of those days, who in¬ cluded Suabians and Silesians, were individually the good fellows they appeared to be. By this time I had derived certain definite first impres¬ sions from life in Berlin which it is interesting to recall in the light of later events. We were witnesses of a period of transition. The great extension of industrialism was trans¬ ferring a large number of the agricultural population to manufacturing centres and there was a rapid growth of socialistic spirit in the towns. But the natural docility of the masses, respectful to and dependent on constituted authority, made the movement slow to produce its full effect. Military and aristocratic tradition held the ground firmly, and all the machinery of state was dominated by the classes. The executive was still independent and the government in essentials autocratic. But already longer heads perceived symptoms of a coming change and the steady lengthening of a shadow which a mentality trained in certain conventions had convinced itself could only be lifted by a successful war. Looking back now after some five-and-thirty years I realize that the anticipations made in my diaries forecasting future troubles in store for the German Empire were not over-stated. Had the Emperor Frederick, with his broad and liberal outlook on life, reigned for the number of years on which he might reasonably have counted, much might have been different. The omnipotent influence of the Bismarckian bureaucracy and the military caste would have been weak¬ ened, and time would have worked for the elements which make for peace. But events as they turned out only con¬ tributed to accentuate contrasts, and those in power did not fail to perceive the growing precariousness of their tenure. The elections of 1912 with their Socialist gains were, for those who realized the internal conditions in Germany, ominous of what might befall in the next few years, and it G 82 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES was inevitable that the military authorities who still con¬ trolled the situation should with their mentality have felt that the time had come to precipitate the war which if successful would, they believed, have given autocracy an extension of life. It would not, however, have been easy in 1885 to accept the dictum of Gervinus, who died some fourteen years earlier, that Bismarck was only an episode. CHAPTER III BERLIN, 1885-1886 We stayed tlie night at Paris with Lord Lyons, whose acquaintance I then made for the first time, and went on the next morning to London. The Ambassadorial wedding in the Abbey was a very magnificent function and assembled more than the usual crowd of spectators. Having assisted my chief to the best of my ability through the last phase of an unusually long bachelorhood, I then had a few days of liberty. Cecil Spring-Rice, who was still at the Foreign Office, took me down to Haslemere to spend a night with Tennyson. The dear old man, whose innocent vanity betrayed itself in his picturesque black cloak and big slouch hat, was kindness itself. One could see how he loved his beautiful garden. He was full of questions about Germany and Bismarck, and vehement in his political denunciations, especially at that moment of the attitude of Russia, which country seemed like a red rag to him. We spoke of the work of a young writer, May Probyn, who to the great regret of her admirers, abandoned poetry for the convent. I had made a pil¬ grimage to Devizes to see her some time before. Tennyson agreed that there was a great deal of promise in her writing, and he had always wished to know her. It was a pity that the " priests had taken possession of her." He discoursed upon the values of " words," speaking of them as an artist might do of colours, of their juxtaposition and their conno¬ tation, conveying the impression that he trusted rather to a masterly use of language for effect than to feeling or sentiment. After dinner we withdrew from the dining-room 83 84 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES to a smaller room for dessert, as it is still the custom at College to retire to the Common Room. There he mixed his whisky and lamented the actual evil case of England as it presented itself to him. He would not admit that he was a pessimist. His fears were only for the moment. He demanded an iron hand for order, and would let freedom come with time. Then he left us for a while and coming back read us the Ode on the Duke of Wellington, which at times he seemed almost to be chanting in his deep sonorous voice. We talked and smoked till midnight. Hallam Tennyson and Mrs. Hallam, the best of company, lived with them at Haslemere, for at that time the eldest son devoted himself almost entirely to the good cause of serving his father and his mother, the most beautiful old lady I ever saw, but frail as a wraith, in whom the body seemed almost to have worn away and to have left only the gracious presence of a soul. Laura Tennant had written to me of her : "To be with her is like being in Church.—If I had a little child, I should take it to be blessed by her." After breakfast the next morning I walked with the poet for about an hour and he spoke much of the little Madonna, as he called Laura Tennant, and her approaching marriage to Alfred Lyttelton. He too had fallen under the spell when he had travelled with her and Mr. Gladstone on the " Pembroke Castle." Of this experience she had written to me ; " Tennyson and I were great friends. He always calls me his little witch. He used to read to me every day.—I cannot imagine being frightened of Tennyson, although a good many of them were —he is so childlike and so much too big to be afraid of. I wish you could have seen the moonlight. It never was so fair before ; such a golden path across the sea, like a street for angels to tread on, a path that led to the city of God." Of Gladstone he also spoke, referring to him as a good friend and an honest nature, but " Ah ! " he said, " he is no states¬ man, and he will be the ruin of England." After this interlude, one of the pleasant episodes in life of many which I owed to my dear friend Cecil Spring-Rice, BERLIN, 1885-1886 85 a great Englishman to whom and to whose work in the war due justice has not yet been done, I returned to Berlin, and not long afterwards the new Ambassadress arrived with the Chief. Marriage made but little difference in the pleasant social life which their kindness and consideration maintained for the staff on much the old lines, and a happier family than that over which they presided would be hard to find. Charles Hardinge and Reggie Lister and Fairfax Cartwright were among the colleagues of those days who subsequently made their mark in the profession. In May Lord Rosebery paid a brief visit to the Embassy, which greatly exercised the journalists. Blowitz, the Paris correspondent of The Times, with considerable ingenuity, and what in anyone else might have been characterized as consummate impudence, pro¬ duced a full report of what had passed between him and the Chancellor when closeted alone. It was a mischievous article too, for The Times was then, as it long continued to be, regarded on the Continent as officially inspired, and the Chancellor's views as there described by Mr. Blowitz were calculated to arouse a good deal of protest. Early in June, 1885, the Government at home were de¬ feated on a financial issue and Mr. Gladstone was believed to have manoeuvred for this opportunity of resigning. The Queen sent for Lord Salisbury. They were delighted in Berlin, where they hoped to get on better with the Tories, and a change in the attitude of the German Government became at once perceptible. It was, however, only a short¬ lived interlude, for Gladstone came back in January of the following year, to remain in office for an equally brief period of six months, terminated by the rejection of his Home Rule proposals. Spring-Rice sent me an amusing story a propos of the change of Government which I suspect him of having invented. Baron Henry de Worms and Sir Henry Drum- mond Wolff met on the doorstep of Lord Salisbury's house in Arlington Street. " Hullo, Wolff," said Worms, " what are you doing here,—looking for a new suit of sheep's 86 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES clothing ? " " Hullo, Worms," said Wolff, " looking for a carcass 1 " Soon after my return Prince Frederick Carl, who gained the name of the Red Prince during the war of '70, died, and a day later General Manteuffel. Herbert Bismarck now rejoined the Foreign Office and not long afterwards he suc¬ ceeded Hatzfeldt when the latter was sent to London and Munster was transferred to Paris. After the departure of Hatzfeldt there were no more tennis afternoons in the gardens of the Foreign Office. On the other hand, Count Herbert, who was most friendly to me, in spite of my very junior rank, often invited me to little bachelor dinners, where we sampled some of the wonderful old wines sent to his father by his admirers among the proprietors of historic vineyards on the Rhine, in which the old man was no longer allowed by Schweniger to indulge. Another frequent guest, who appreciated the priceless Rauenthaler, was Count Paul Schouvaloff, the Russian Ambassador, brother of the Count Peter, who was so well known in London. I once saw the two brothers at the Friedrichstrasse Station in Berlin, both in military uniform, embrace each other so heartily that the peaks of their kepis collided and both the caps fell off and rolled under the train. Count Paul, of whom we were all very fond, embarrassed me gravely on one occasion after dinner at his own Embassy by putting his hand on my shoulder and saying in English, a language which I had never heard him use before, to Herbert Bismarck : " You are nozing and we are nozing. Zis is the only people ! I have one upstairs, she is with us ten years. Will you not marry her and make her children ? I can no more ! " Obviously an attache in those days had need of some dis¬ cretion. One night Count Herbert took me and some of my col¬ leagues to the Borussia Kneipe, the post-university Club of old Bonn students, where there was a great drinking of that wonderful Munich beer, the nectar of Walhalla. The Secretary of State, whom a mutual friend described as a BERLIN, 1885-1886 87 Kneipe-genie, because his head was always clear and he could sit down to grapple with a difficult bit of work after an evening which would have disqualified most of us, genially undertook to respond to healths which might be proposed to any of our party after our more limited beer capacity was exhausted. A young lancer of my acquaintance challenged a friend to a contest in rapidity of consumption, and I was invited to give the word of command in the conventional rigmarole. The mugs were placed on the table in front of the rivals, and at the given signal each took his own and literally poured the contents down his throat, the winner being the drinker who could first say prosit after emptying his mug. My friend was beaten, and at once challenged his rival to a double test. The process was repeated with two mugs apiece, but he was beaten again. Whereupon he proposed a quadruple contest, and this time four mugs were placed in front of each and tossed off with the same astounding rapidity. The result was, however, unchanged, and my lancer then said he would accept defeat for the mo¬ ment. I asked him if he had many schoppes before we came, —we had arrived rather late after a dinner party. " Not many," he replied, " about seventeen." The astonishing thing about these young officers was that they would be duly on parade the next morning at six at Potsdam. They were a hardy race. During the dancing season in Berlin they seemed never to have an opportunity of sleeping at night, and yet they appeared perfectly fit and healthy. I read a great deal of German at this period, and attended the Deutsches Theater regularly, where the performances were maintained at a very high level of excellence by Kaintz, Friedman, Forster, Engels, Teresina Gessner and Agnes Sorma, and it was possible to study the classic drama, including Shakespeare and Calderon. There was an inter¬ esting revival of an early production of Schiller, Cabale und Liebe, admirably rendered, containing dramatic material enough for three tragedies, and to my mind nearer human nature than his later plays which are more purely works of 88 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES art. The Court Theater was also excellent, but more academic. The Royal Opera gave us a Wagner season with Frau Rosa Sucher, the finest exponent of the Wagnerian heroine that I have ever heard. The ballets were a delight when the principal part was played by Del 'Era, whose art as a dancer and a mime I have never seen surpassed. We supped with her occasionally, when she and her sister cooked the macaroni and talked of her native Naples. It had never occurred to me before that the dancer could be as nervous as I have seen her, when about to play a new part. The Niebelungen Lied, which I then studied from cover to cover for the first time, struck me as in many ways typical of the people among whom I was living. It is, of course, only a Volkslied, but it is lacking in the humanity which occasion¬ ally illuminates other folk poetry. It is all hacking and hewing, and raiment and gold and blood. Though genuinely rhythmic, it is poor in poetic feeling, monotonous and material. Even the recurring epithets which are so suggestive in the early epic are not there distributed with any art. Hagen is not the polumetis or the polumechanos, but just the " Grim," and no gleam of human interest relieves the black shadow cast by the evil genius of the drama. The poetic achieve¬ ment of Germany in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century was remarkable and never greater than at the time of the deepest national depression, but the old national epic struck me as wanting in any real poetic quality. Having completed my two years of probationary attache- ship I went on leave in August, and on arriving at home found public interest entirely occupied with the Dilke case. " What are people saying about it ? " Chamberlain asked Labouchere, who was then editing Truth, in the Lobby. " They are all saying they wish it was you instead," Labby replied imperturbably. Not long after my return to Berlin in October I accom¬ panied my chief to Dessau. He was accredited to some ten smaller German Courts in addition to Berlin, and had to pay at least one formal visit to each in order to present his BERLIN, 1885-1886 89 official letter of appointment. The Court at Dessau was typical of an old-world life, which has now probably passed away for ever, patriarchal, kindly and picturesque, and a description of our experience there will serve as an illus¬ tration of the procedure at a number of similar " residencies." After a few hours on the road at Wittenberg, spent in visiting Luther's house and a church full of pictures by his friend Cranach the elder, we arrived at Dessau early in the afternoon and were conducted to the schloss, where we at once put on uniform for the presentation. The court dignitaries, the Grand Chamberlain, the Master of the Horse, the Grand Veneur and the military household were assem¬ bled in full dress to conduct us in procession to the audience. After a brief interval we dined at 4 p.m. in the Rittersaal, filled with trophies of the family hero, that great cavalry leader, the " old Dessauer." The Duke of Anhalt-Dessau was most easy of address and a charming personality. His manner suggested : " Don't hate me for being the Duke. I have to be. But I do my best to be a human being in spite of all the paraphernalia." The key-note of the Duchess and the family was a kindly simplicity, which extended also to a Schwarzburg-Sondershausen brother-in-law. After din¬ ner, which was served by an army of retainers, we got out of uniform and redressed for the Court theatre where there was a very fair performance of Tannhauser, with a remark¬ ably good orchestra. The theatre is, of course, maintained by the Duke. Then there was supper in the Gyps-Saal decorated very effectively with the old copper plates from which engravings of the family portraits and estates had been struck. After supper we were shown the treasures and duly reverenced the " old Dessauer's " saddle and pistol. But the object of the greatest interest was the Kroten-ring, the toad-ring with which the fortunes of the house are bound up. There was once a very good and gracious princess of Anhalt- Dessau, who was kind and gentle to all things living and even to the animals which others persecute. She had saved and tended an ugly toad. Now the toad was really a fairy 90 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES in disguise, and because of her sweetness and goodness the fairy resumed her proper form and gave her a ring which would always secure good fortune to her house, on the one condition that it was never taken away or carried across the Elbe. The tradition was duly reverenced, but once a sceptical Duke put it on his finger and rode across the river. As he reached the further shore a messenger over¬ took him and announced that his castle was in flames. On another occasion when it was temporarily removed a great fissure divided the main wall of the schloss. Wherefore it was thereafter carefully bestowed in a double safe let into a wall, and only the reigning Duke had the key. It is a ring of pale gold set with uncut diamonds. We were invited to take it in hand and wish the wish, which the ring has power to fulfil. I cannot remember what I wished. Perhaps it was for the opportunity to smoke, which duly followed the restoration of the ring to the safe ! After an early breakfast the following morning we drove off to the summer residence, Schloss Worlitz, with one of the Versailles gardens which every small reigning prince felt bound to lay out in the eighteenth century. The lines of Anhalt-Zerbst and Anhalt-Kothen became extinct and their territories and domains fell in to the father of the present Duke of Anhalt-Dessau, with the result that he had seven¬ teen palaces or houses to maintain. He had placed all his property on a private footing and so had nothing to fear from revolution. The local Government was carried on by a Diet and a Ministry, and except for the administration of his own estates the Duke enjoyed a sinecure. The palaces were full of interesting portraits, among which I noticed those of the Duke of Alva, Machiavelli, the great Elector, the two beautiful Mancinis, Mazarin's nieces, and the old Dessauer at all ages. There was also a portrait of Shakes- speare about which I should have liked to know more, and of course Catherine of Russia, who was an Anhalt of Zerbst. Of that large-hearted and unquiet empress many tales have been told. There is one which I would rescue from oblivion. BERLIN, 1885-1886 91 It was her habit on warm spring evenings in Russia to walk with her ladies in the private gardens of the Summer Palace. Her observant eye had noticed on several successive evenings that the youngest and comeliest of these made a point of passing last through a certain little gateway and exchanging signs of confidence with the royal page whose duty it was to stand on guard there. Accordingly one night when they had remained late and it was very dark, she ordered all her ladies to precede her, and herself passed last through the garden gateway. The page awaiting the accustomed oppor¬ tunity, as he closed the gate and followed, gave the last veiled figure a genial pinch from behind, whereupon the Empress, turning round upon him, exclaimed with a little scream : " Insolent! Declarez-vous ! " The page, with ready presence of mind, replied, "Si voire Majeste a le coeur aussi dur que son derriere, je suis perdu." He was forgiven and promoted. After lunch we took our leave and left for Berlin with a pleasant memory of the Duke of Anhalt, the green diluvial meadows of the Elbe and Mulde, and the patriarchal life of the reigning family among a loyal and contented people. This visit was followed by another to Brunswick. But the procedure of one small court resembled that of another and one description will suffice. Their ceremonial and eti¬ quette was quite as elaborate, if not more so, than that of Berlin, and it could not be disregraded with impunity. Count Mons, who was afterwards Ambassador in Rome when I was counsellor there, had been Minister resident at Oldenburg. The Grand Duchess once perceived him from an upper window arriving at the Palace in a soft hat and a dust coat, under which he concealed the regulation frock- coat, which was de rigueur for an audience. She instructed her chamberlain to tell him that it would be more becoming to present himself at the palace in a silk hat. The chamber¬ lain did not much appreciate tackling Count Mons, who was known to have a mordant tongue. However, there was no escape, and he had to approach the subject of the hat, which 92 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES he did deprecatingly, observing, " Yon know, my dear Count, how particular they are at these little Courts." "Yes," said Mons} " I know, but ' Kleiner Hof Kleiner Hut!' " (Little hats for little Courts !) Sir Robert Morier, our Ambassador in Russia, stayed a day or two at the Embassy on his way to St. Petersburg. There was an ancient feud between him and Bismarck, dating especially from 1870 when Morier was at Darmstadt, and due to his intimacy with some of the great man's rivals. He had also fallen out with Count Herbert at Munich. The latter said that Morier had behaved abomin¬ ably in publicly taking Arnim's part against his father. Morier, on the other hand, said that Count Herbert had behaved abominably in quarrelling with him because he had invited Arnim, who was an old friend, to dinner when the latter was passing through Munich. Malet thought the opportunity should be taken of reconciling them and in¬ vited Count Herbert to meet him at dinner. At the last moment, however, Morier was sent for by the Crown Princess, and when he returned after dinner Herbert Bismarck had already left. So the occasion went by and the old feud was recalled in a very unpleasant manner not long afterwards. I never served under Morier, but I saw him from time to time on his way through Berlin and had several interesting conversations with him which made me respect his lucid and vigorous power of expression. He was a big man intellectu¬ ally as well as physically, and a formidable antagonist. In Russia he strenuously upheld British interests during the dispute over the Pamirs with a vigour which almost scared the authorities at home. It was reported that the Queen, on whom certain family interests had perhaps been brought to bear, once suggested to Lord Iddesleigh, during the latter's brief tenure of the Foreign Office in 1886-87, that Morier might be transferred to another field of activity, and. failing to elicit a response, had suggested that he would make a strong Governor of a Colony. " But which of your Majesty's Colonies," inquired Lord Iddesleigh, "is your Majesty BERLIN, 1885-1886 93 prepared to lose ? " Morier nevertheless succeeded in estab¬ lishing a remarkable position for himself in St. Petersburg, where he was eventually appreciated and trusted. The consistent hostility towards him of the Bismarcks probably contributed not a little to enhance his popularity as Russo- German cordiality began to wane. In November Matthew Arnold came to Berlin to stay some weeks and prepare a report on education in Germany. The unmarried secretaries at the Embassy had at that time a little mess for luncheon at Langlet's, an excellent restaurant kept by a Frenchman, at the corner of the Wilhelm Strasse and the Linden, almost next door to the Embassy, and we at once invited the poet to become an honorary member. He lunched with us there nearly every day and we became the greatest friends. We took him to stay at Gorlsdorf, the hospitable house of Count Redern, well known in England in the 'seventies. We induced him to accompany us to the plays and the opera, and the great man renewed his youth and entered into all our combinations. Matthew Arnold was fully conscious of his own value and possessed what the Irishman prayed the Lord to give him, " a good conceit of himself " in no small measure, but he was a very lovable man, and I at any rate felt greatly flattered by his friendship. The world had not treated him too kindly, or rather he would never give the world a chance of doing so, for he could not condescend to nonconformist and philistine mentality or " do without contempt." It has always been a pleasure to me to know, as I heard afterwards from his two delightful daughters, that he had greatly enjoyed his stay in Berlin and talked of it with genuine pleasure. One day a slight mis¬ adventure befell. We were under the impression that he had gone away for two or three days on a round of inspection. One of our party had invited two extremely smart and amusing French demi-mondaines, who were passing through Berlin, to the mess, parenthetically a quite irregular pro¬ ceeding, though the mess had no strict rules or precedents. We had just sat down to table when the door of our Cabinet 94 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES particulier opened and Matthew walked smilingly in. Ex¬ planations were useless as well as impossible, and a chair was placed between the two ladies for " le cher poete," and as one of them was well known for her brilliant wit, the meal was hilarious. His French accent was not by any means equal to his knowledge of French literature, but he struggled manfully and I am quite sure he enjoyed himself. As we strolled away together he put a hand on my shoulder and observed in the grand manner: " Most amusing ! But really I cannot imagine that Aspasia and Phryne were quite like that." The episode evidently remained in his memory, for a month or so after his departure I received a letter from the Athenaeum, announcing his return to Berlin early in 1886, and adding : " I hope those Sirens, both the silent and the noisy one, have long since departed, and that your luncheons are such as the Bishop and I can approve," I took him to the Reichstag. The Chancellor spoke, but that day his voice was almost inaudible. There was a battle royal between him and his bitter antagonist Windhorst, the Catholic and Hanoverian. The latter ended his speech with the words: " People would say that the Government of the late King of Prussia had been pleasanter to live under than the actual Government of Prince Bismarck." These words brought the Chancellor to his feet. They were, he said, a deadly insult to himself and to the Emperor, whose humble and loyal servant he tried to be. He referred to his own increasing years and failing health, and deplored that he should come to the Reichstag only to be affronted. It was not long after this that Bucher in the Grenzboten, and according to Busch at the Chancellor's suggestion, compared Windhorst and Gladstone in an article entitled " Diminishers of the Realm." Little more than two years later I learned with deep regret of the sudden death of Matthew Arnold at Liverpool, whither he had gone to meet his daughter, who was arriving from America. He went out full of life and spirits into the bright April day and walked a little, when suddenly the BERLIN, 1885-1886 95 " cabined ample spirit fluttered and failed for breath," and he fell forward dead. He was only sixty-six. The last time I had seen him we had met in the Strand, and walked some way together. He enlarged in his spacious manner on the delights of London and the pleasure he took in sauntering through the streets and watching the life of the great city. More than thirty years have passed since we foregathered in Berlin, and my admiration for his poetry has grown and grown ; so that it is to him and to Browning that I most often turn as the years increase, to the great optimist of life for encouragement, and then back to the delicate music of Arnold, which brings " the eternal note of sadness in." At the beginning of December there came a rather dis¬ quieting telegram regarding Lady Ermyntrude Malet's health, followed at once by a very alarming one from the Queen, which I deciphered. I broke to the Ambassador as much of it as seemed necessary, and we left for England that night. Fortunately before the train left better news had arrived. While in London I passed my examination in International Law, which was a preliminary condition to receiving £250 a year instead of £150, which remained the normal scale of pay for a third secretary until the other day. I remember on the way back to Berlin via Paris, witnessing one of the many revelations of my chief's kind¬ ness of heart. A young Englishman was travelling with a spaniel which he tried to take with him in the train. No difficulty was made by the railway personnel, but an old gentleman objected, and the dog was being reluctantly dragged off to the guard's van, when Malet intervened—• we had a reserved coupe—and offered the dog hospitality. He lay quietly at our feet all the way to Paris. Many pages could easily be filled with stories of his kindness and con¬ sideration, and I for one owe him an everlasting debt of gratitude. He taught me the business of my profession, but he did much more than that. He insisted on the human relation in official life, deprecated the superior answer and the bureaucratic manner, and made me see that it was my 96 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES duty, if I had the opportunity, to help every one to the best of my ability. He always took an interest in the little black- hooded black-faced chimney sweepers' boys, who figure in Hans Andersen's tales, and who in Berlin always accompanied the sweepers at their work, and he instituted an annual dinner for these apprentices. That also no doubt is one of the little amenities of life which the war will have swept away. He had always retained a boyish quality himself. A story he used to tell of an Eton experience was very characteristic of the two men whom it concerned. On the 4th of June Lord Brougham, his step-grandfather, drove down his coach, on which Malet and an elder brother joined him. " Boys must be tipped," said Lord Brougham, " here's half a crown for you," and he gave each of them a coin wrapped up in a bit of paper. When they opened the paper the coin proved to be a penny, and Brougham roared with laughter at their discomfiture. However, Alfred Montgomery, who was also on the coach, said: " Well, boys, I am not so rich as Lord Brougham, but I can afford a shilling," and he gave them each another coin, also wrapped up in paper, which turned out to be a sovereign. There was a curious side to Malet's character. He took an almost naive pleasure in simple amusements and he was very easily touched to a sense of pity for human things. But he never allowed himself to grow enthusiastic over anything, nor did he seem to me to have a very strong grip on life. In fact I remember his saying one day,—it is true that this was before he was married—that if he could without incon¬ venience to anyone, just by walking through a door, pass out of the world also, he would as soon do so as not. I do not think he had in him any trace of superstition or of mysticism, and yet in one point he admitted that he had been affected by an influence which does not generally appeal to the sceptical temperament. He had gone many years before, rather out of curiosity, to see the famous French expert in palmistry, Desbarolles, who had no idea of his identity. Malet had just been in charge at Constantinople, BERLIN, 1885-1886 97 where many interesting things had happened. Desbarolles told him so much about himself and his recent experiences that he was impressed and he asked the palmist whether there were any tendencies of character indicated in his hand to which he ought to give attention. Desbarolles told him that he was diffident of his own judgment, and that so far from this being justified his judgment was sound and he ought always to act upon his first impression or impulse, because it was almost sure to be right. Malet said that he thought a good deal about this advice, and came to the conclusion that it was warranted and that he had been inclined to mistrust himself and revise his decisions. So he put it into practice ever after and had had no occasion to regret doing so. The twenty-fifth anniversary of the Emperor's accession to the throne of Prussia fell on the 25th of January, 1886. Lord Wolseley was sent as special envoy to Berlin to carry the Queen's congratulations, to the delight of Colonel Swaine, the military attache, who had been with him in Egypt and was one of his oldest friends. He stayed at the Embassy. I was not present at the ceremonial defile, when the Emperor embraced Bismarck and Moltke. But the chief told me of an amusing episode which occurred. Bismarck was anxious to see Wolseley, and the Ambassador was on the point of presenting him, when the Turkish Ambassador, who was standing alongside, slipped between them, and the Chancellor, who was evidently rather absent, took him for Wolseley and said, " I see you preserve your oriental appearance ! " An interview was, however, arranged later. Bismarck on that occasion apparently spoke with great frankness. He said that Germany could not afford to do otherwise than to keep well with Russia, but that he would always be ready to support us against France. One curious point which he mentioned was that Napoleon III had asked his advice before the Italian campaign of 1859. He had, however, never mentioned the matter until after the ex-Emperor's death. With reference to that campaign Strachey, our H 98 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES Minister at Dresden, told me an interesting story. Cavour said one day to Sir James Hudson, our representative at Turin: "We can now be quiet and wait patiently ; the Emperor is coming." Hudson asked him how he came to be so confident of this. Cavour for answer handed him a paper containing a letter from Orsini, then in prison and under sentence of death for the attempted assassination of Napoleon III. It seems that the Emperor had sent his minister Pietri to visit him in prison. Pietri quite got round Orsini, and in¬ duced him to write a letter confirming the good intentions of the Emperor, who was only awaiting an opportune moment. If, however, Italian agitators continued to attempt his life it would make it impossible for him to move. The letter was genuine. Orsini knew that he could not be reprieved, but he was induced to write as he did for the sake of the cause. During Lord Wolseley's visit we had a big military dinner at the Embassy, to which all the principal generals at that time in Berlin were invited. Moltke unfortunately was prevented by an old engagement from accepting. The arrangement of the table and the relative precedence of all these military mandarins gave me endless trouble. We were, I think, thirty-six in all. Herbert Bismarck arrived a quarter of an hour late and, on being shown his seat next to the Ambassador, studied the plan and saw the name of the German general who was to be his neighbour on the left. "You must change that place," he said. I protested that this would mean moving every one and that we were already late. He said he could not help it; he would not sit next to a man who—and then proceeded with his habitual unre- ticence to give the reason in the crudest terms. In despera¬ tion I went to the dining-room and, keeping my head, rapidly made such dispositions as were possible to modify the table without doing too much violence to the order of precedence, to which so much importance was attached in Germany. Of course the general who was to have sat next to the Foreign Secretary was surprised to find his card transferred elsewhere, and I had to take it on myself and BERLIN, 1885-1886 99 regret that I had indicated the wrong place to him. After dinner Herbert casually observed to me : " After all, it was not necessary to have changed the places. It was not that man to whom I objected, but another who has the same name." Wolseley made an excellent impression in Berlin and was allowed to accept the grand cross of the Red Eagle by an exceptional authorization rare in the days of Queen Victoria. It was during this and the previous year that the Balkan question first began to bulk large in my official experience, and thereafter remained a permanent and fertile source of preoccupation. The union of Eastern Roumelia and Bul¬ garia in September, 1885, was a triumph for the anti-Russian party. The war between Servia and Bulgaria ended with the complete discomfiture of the former and Prince Alexander of Battenberg became an heroic figure. There was much rumour of a marriage alliance which the Crown Princess was said ardently to desire, and which Bismarck would not hear of, having always in view the urgent importance of friendly relations with Russia. There was the scandalous plot to kidnap and depose the Prince, who was transforming Bul¬ garia into a powerful state, strong enough to defy his former Russian protector, followed by his restoration and his subsequent resignation in August, 1886. Then Greece filled the horizon, and the Greek blockade. But I do not propose as a rule to deal with any but personal reminiscences, and as yet the Balkans were only known to me through official correspondence. At the end of January I went for a fort¬ night to Italy. On my return I found Lord Edward Cecil, of whom I was to see much in after years, rubbing up his German in Berlin before beginning life in the army. At this time Panoramas were much in vogue. They have now been killed by the Cinematograph. But there was a lot of clever work in them. In Berlin there was a Panorama representing incidents of the war of 1870, in which Bismarck on horseback was portrayed riding up to the carriage of Napoleon III. The Chancellor said he had been obliged to send a letter to the proprietors telling them that they 100 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES had altogether wrongly presented the scene of that dramatic interview. What had really happened was that as soon as he saw the Emperor's carriage he dismounted and let his horse go, advancing to meet him on foot. He would never have ridden up in the aggressive manner in which he had been painted. " But," said he, " a sort of rabid patriotism misrepresented the business, and gave me credit for a piece of rudeness of which I am incapable." George von Bunsen, a man wonderfully clear-headed and wise with much learning, endowed with a remarkable faculty of expressing his thoughts lucidly, used to reveal to me the other side of the Bismarckian medal. He always spoke in terms of great moderation, but one was conscious of a certain bitterness in a man who was practically ostracized from a social world which only admitted one school of politics. Twenty years earlier, he said, he and those who belonged to his group had great hopes for Germany. He had tried to form a party of men who had time and means at their disposal, and who would devote themselves to public service as men of the same social standing did in England. He had found many ready to co-operate. But the Bis¬ marckian ascendancy had crushed any such initiative. Everything which did not proceed from and rest upon the State and upon paternal government was discouraged, and there was no room for such a sphere of activity. One of the sinister effects of the prevailing regime was the deteriora¬ tion of the Civil Service. Twenty years earlier the Prussian Civil Service had been the best in the world, the most public- spirited. Its members devoted all their energies to develop¬ ing the resources of a poor country, and forgot themselves in their work, in which they took pride. But the men who had left the Universities since the first great Prussian suc¬ cess in 1866 were inspired by quite other ideas. Personal advancement at any cost was now the only aim of their emulation. There was a tendency to ride roughshod over every one, and to treat every questioner as a person who had no right to presume to an opinion. These were unfortun- BERLIN, 1885-1886 101 ately the men with whom the Crown Prince would have to govern. On the 24th of April a telegram from George Curzon reached me with these words: "Laura died this morning." Her boy was born on the 17th and she never really rallied. To how many of us did it seem on that sad morning that " Glory and loveliness have passed away " and that the world was infinitely poorer. Since the days when religious fervour canonized certain gracious ephemeral presences, the legend of whose gentle charm abides, it can seldom have happened that so young a life should in three or four years have cast such a spell over old and young, over the quickest and the keenest intelligences, as well as over the humble and obscure The tragedy of it is vivid to me still after five-and-thirty years. The gods had loved her too well. Perhaps no one better than Mr. Gladstone in his beautiful letter to Alfred Lyttelton summed up what had been, when he wrote that life was to be measured not by time but by intensity, and that in her few years she had probably lived as much and more than other lives which are prolonged to the allotted term. From those who knew and loved her, as from those who had only known of her by report, I never heard one word of criticism, though her life was unconventional and eman¬ cipated beyond the spirit of those days. There was a Tight¬ ness and a grace in every spontaneous act and gesture, and never "anything a man might blame." It seems she had anticipated that the crowning experience of motherhood might be her last, and had written a series of wonderful messages to her friends. To me as one of the first whom she had known intimately there came a very touching meessage, which Alfred sent me in a letter which tore the heart. " I leave Rennell Rodd my Browning and my Blake. He taught me to love Browning and I am full of gratitude." There followed a touching message commending to my affection the child that was still unborn, which seems to suggest a pre¬ monition that she would not survive the ordeal. I feel it is of too intimate a character to quote. Little Christopher, 102 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES however, only survived for a brief stage the radiant being who awaited him where " Love not wisdom watches at the Gate." In addition to my normal work and my duties as private secretary I devoted all my spare time at this period to a voluminous report on the German administrative system, and later to another on the insurance of seamen, the first instalment of a comprehensive scheme of working men's insurance included in Bismarck's state socialistic programme- The obligation of juniors interested in their profession to prepare voluntary reports on matters of public interest in foreign countries seems to have fallen of late years rather into abeyance. It is true that for many years past current work has been so heavy that little time has remained for special studies. But the practice was no doubt valuable. Research and inquiry brought the younger secretaries into contact with officials and representative men, and entailed a certain exploration of the country in which they were posted. A report, moreover, supplying information on the foreign treatment of questions which were engaging public attention at home, if efficiently prepared, ensured a good mark to the writer. I was interested to see how much space in the press was devoted to my reports, which were published as official papers. It was a standing custom that the whole staff of the Embassy should dine on the Queen's birthday with the Crown Prince and Princess at Wildpark. This year (1886) the old Emperor was present at the dinner. He appeared to have taken a new lease of life and was in excellent health and spirits. In June of the same year took place the tragic and dramatic death of Ludwig of Bavaria, the mad king. Malet was sent to Munich to represent the Queen at the funeral, and I, as usual, accompanied him. All sorts of stories were current as regards the King's death, and it remained shrouded in uncertainty. He had been for some time placed under restraint and constantly attended by a doctor. BERLIN, 1885-1886 103 His brother Otto, who had from the first been kept under supervision, was reported once to have observed that he himself had lucid intervals, but that Ludwig was always mad. There was, however, method and something more in his madness. Like Nero he was an artist by temperament, and a great patron of art. Wagner owed everything to his encouragement and support, and his conceptions were magnificent if inconsistent with modern ideas and resources. His hero was Louis XIV. I remember the Crown Prince telling me that he went to see him at the moment when war with France had become inevitable, and found him quite reasonable and sound on the political issue which they had to discuss, but really much more interested in a monument which he had just erected to the memory of the Roi Soleil than in actual and vital issues. His extra¬ vagances in expenditure, and apparently also his personal violence, made it inevitable that he should be placed under some restraint, and a regent was appointed in his uncle Leutpold, who eventually, after the death of Otto, became King. Under the circumstances it seems strange that he should have been confined on the borders of a lake. It will be remembered that he was drowned at no great distance from the shore, and that the body of Gudden, the doctor who was in charge of him, was also found in quite shallow water. The explanation which obtained general acceptance at the time was that he had attempted to escape by swimming across the lake, and it was even rumoured that his cousin the Empress of Austria had a carriage waiting for him at a spot indicated outside the park But the probabilities pointed rather to suicide. He had already tried to obtain a poison. He was a big and very powerful man, and there seemed to be no doubt that he killed the doctor, who had probably followed him into the shallow water and tried to hold him back Drummond, our Minister in Munich, who saw the bodies the morning after they were recovered, told me that Gudden had been struck on the 104 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES head with a heavy stone. If the stories told in Munich could be credited, there had been other victims of his violence. He had an unbalanced sense of his own greatness and absoluteness A mania for solitude grew upon him and he resented any intrusion on his privacy. On the other hand, he was friendly and affable to those in humbler life. There were also stories of a more sinister character current. He was undoubtedly a man of many and remarkable gifts, and an instance of how nearly great wit and madness are allied. The Ambassador walked in the funeral procession, which I witnessed from the house of Sir Henry Howard, the former British Minister, who, after his retirement, had adopted Munich as his home. A very picturesque feature were the groups of the various religious orders in their old-world dress. The Crown Prince Frederick, who followed the bier with the Archduke Rudolph, carried his baton of field-marshal. The ceremony in the church lost much by the absence of any music from organ or instrument, and the intoning of the bishops and canons without accompani¬ ment sounded harsh. A magnificent catafalque had been erected to receive the coffin, and a shield bore the inscription: " Ludwig von Bayern Pfalzgraf am Rhein." We obtained permission to go to Chiemsee and visit the new and even more sumptuous Versailles which he had been for many years building on an island in the lake. The main feature were all reproduced, the Galerie des Glaces, which, if I am not mistaken, was of even larger proportions than the original, the Oeil de Boeuf and the bedroom of state. The magnificent staircase was, however, original. He had last been there some nine months before, and no work had been done since. The fountains had only played once. Before our visit, with the exception of the workmen and architects actually engaged in construction, only some half dozen people had been allowed to see the palace, and even the objects which were being made for it were shown to no one. A million had already been spent there and it BERLIN, 1885-1886 105 would have cost another to complete it. Hardly less fantastically extravagant was the castle of romance which he had constructed at Neuschwanstein. His commanding presence and handsome face, his artistic impulses and his solitary and uncanny life, had long interested the world in this strange figure of a King whose tragic death remains shrouded in mystery. He will live in the legends of the mountain people who were long unwilling to believe that he was really dead. I spent a month at home in July and August and accom¬ panied George Leveson Gower during the last days of his election campaign round Staffordshire, where he was beaten by some 800 votes after having been elected with a majority of 1,300 only a year before. Mr. Gladstone's decision in favour of Home Rule for Ireland had roused great bitterness in the country. It was an old age conversion. Years afterwards Lord Cromer told me that when he himself thought of entering political life as a Liberal he had con¬ sulted Gladstone, who advised him against doing so, on the ground that there was no further special work for the Liberal party to do after the electoral Reform Bills. But Gladstone was bound to find some new outlet for the energy which years had not impaired, and he entered on the new struggle with ardour and even violence. One night at dinner at Sir Charles Tennant's house he almost shouted : " It has fallen to my lot to teach this nation several lessons. They are very slow to learn, but so help me God, I will make them learn this lesson too." I paid a very pleasant visit to Knebworth, to the Lyttons, who had a large party ; Count Hatzfeldt was there, Lady Galloway, Lady Airlie, Rowton, Cranbourne, Reggie Lister and many more. Lytton talked to me long about literature. Not quite consistently with his former remarks on plagiarism he said that he looked always for the indictum ore alieno. It mattered not so much how a thing was said, but let there be some thing to say, or say nothing. And this reminds me of one of the keenest sayings of Wilde which was being 106 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES quoted about that time. Lewis Morris, who had had a certain success with his Epic of Hades, produced another book of poems, which to his great annoyance was left almost unnoticed by the critics and the literary world, apparently just because he had little or nothing to say. He was complaining to Wilde of the neglect his latest work had encountered and said: " There seems to be a conspiracy of silence. What ought I to do ? " " Join it," said Wilde. At the beginning of September I accompanied the Leveson Gowers, father and son, and Shoobridge for a day or two to Munich, whence we went on to Tegernsee, where Mr. Gladstone was staying with Countess Arco and Lord Acton. Dr. Dollinger was also there. Though nearing his eightieth year Dollinger still bathed every day in the lake, and ate only one modest meal. He was, however, too deaf to join in any general conversation. S. and I stayed at the inn, but went to the villa for our meals. I noticed in Mr. Gladstone a sympathetic attitude of courtesy when he spoke to Dollinger in English, a thoughtful way of correcting his own sentence into simpler language, if it had been a little obscure. It is one of the failings of our countrymen abroad when speaking their own language, and those who spoke any other with facility were then rare, that whether from want of imagination or thoughtfulness they take no particular pains to simplify their sentences, but even use colloquialisms, which a foreigner can hardly be expected to follow. Mr. Gladstone talked to us much about John Stuart Mill. He said of him what I should think was very true, that his mind was so intently fixed upon the subject with which he was dealing that he was quite unaffected by the personality of the individual to whom he might be talking. He never lost his temper however fiercely he might be attacked. " I was so fond of him," he said, " that I never noticed his defects, if he had any." It rather amused us to hear him refer to a certain Mr. Grenville as having been the " Grandest old man in London." He surely cannot have BERLIN, 1885-1886 107 been unconscious that he was himself popularly known as the G.O.M. Reminiscences of Eton occupied us one evening at dinner. Eton was very pagan in his day, he said ; the boys went to chapel but took no prayer books with them, except on Sundays. One, Milnes Gaskell, who was seen with a prayer book on a Saturday was taunted with being a Methodist. When, however, determined to do the right thing, he went to chapel on Sunday without one, he was proclaimed an Atheist. The famous Dr. Keate was only five feet high and had to flog himself into respect. Mr. G. chuckled over the well-known story of how by some accident the confirmation list was substituted for the flogging-list, and Keate accordingly flogged all the candidates, observing when he learned his error that they would no doubt deserve it some other day. Lord Acton never took the initiative in conversation, but he had the charm of a great intellect, untroubled by the storm of public life, and vast as his knowledge was he seemed diffident in pronouncing judg¬ ments. When two such men meet they react on one another, and it was a privilege to hear them talk. An unusual number of English visitors came to Berlin that autumn. One of these Sir George Bowen, who admitted that he had reached the stage of anecdotage; nevertheless he showed his sense of the a, propos by telling Herbert Bismarck a story at dinner at the Embassy which pleased him immensely. Conversing one day with Li Hung Chang, Bowen had discovered that they were both born in the year in which Napoleon died. " Nature," said Sir George, " abhors a vacuum and having removed Napoleon sub¬ stituted Li Hung Chang." The latter acknowledged the compliment, but observed that it had been his ambition to be not the Napoleon but the Bismarck of his country. Some years later I met Sir G. Bowen again in Athens. He had aged considerably and was as full as ever of stories, but with an aggravated tendency to tell the same one over again. One evening at dinner at the Legation he had just told the table the same story twice—the second time after 108 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES a very brief interval. Whereupon George Curzon, who was also dining there, with a perfectly serious face, told him his own story back. Bowen listened without the slightest trace of surprise and said he could guarantee the accuracy of the facts. King George of Greece, in whose honour the dinner was given, could not keep his countenance. Lord Leighton also came to Berlin for the closing of the Art Exhibition. He was a great favourite of the Crown Princess. A little incident which happened one day when we were both lunching with her reveals what a first-rate linguist he was. We were talking German, and I had made use of a word to convey a certain conception, which amused the Germans because they said that though it was quite a good word to have coined and very expressive, it did not really exist in the language. Leighton, with all deference, submitted that it was not only a possible but a recognized word, and a reference to the authoritative dictionary proved him to be right. He was a man of singular charm, whom I always looked upon as having led an ideally happy life. Not only was he glorious to look upon, whether in the Apollo stage of youth, the Zeus-like phase of middle age, or the shaggier Poseidon presentment of later years, but he was so variously gifted as to be " not one but all the arts' epitome." Of course, my friend Whistler with his bitter tongue could not spare him. A lady one day was enlarging enthusiastically on his many accomplishments. He could make a speech in four languages, he was a great critic, and a remarkable musician. " Paints too, don't he ? " said Whistler. Clinton Dawkins also paid me a visit in November. He had been to Venice and happened to be at the island of Burano when a monument was being unveiled to Galuppi, the composer. The Mayor made the panegyric oration, in the course of which he said that Burano was only a small island in a very wide world, and that its eminent son, Baldassare Galuppi, would hardly perhaps have achieved his universal renown had it not been for the English poet BERLIN, 1885-1886 109 who had sung his fame and made him known wherever the English language was spoken. Whereupon he dived into the crowd and, amid the cheers of the assembly, drew forward and set in their midst the " illustre Roberto Browning." It must have been about this time or soon after, when Lord Salisbury had returned to the Foreign Office, that diplomatic secretaries who were next on the list for promo¬ tion were made very indignant by the bestowal of the post of Secretary of Embassy, now called Counsellor, at Vienna on the military attache, whose term of employment was running out. A question asked in Parliament on the subject extracted the superior reply that the military attache has been appointed because no one else was so well qualified to fill the post. A few weeks later he ran away with a very popular and charming dancer, and we felt that the Service was avenged. The Chancellor in these days lost no opportunity of dwelling on the necessity of maintaining Austria as a Power in Europe in order to preserve the equilibrium. He had in 1866 insisted on that policy in opposition to the King of Prussia and all the military party. He was no longer so sure of Russia under Alexander III as he had been in the days of his predecessor. Russian military preparations were regarded with grave suspicion, and in spite of his counter-insurance treaty of 1884 with Russia the Chancellor sought to draw the Tories into a Mediterranean under¬ standing with Italy and Austria. The Boulanger movement in France was beginning to cause him apprehension. A new Army Bill was rejected by the Reichstag, which asserted a view of the Constitution differing radically from Bismarck's, and it was accordingly dissolved. Early in 1887 he repeated to Malet that Germany would not attack France, nor would France attack Germany so long as the actual French Ministry remained in office. But Boulanger had involved himself in grave pledges, and had wanted to send 50,000 men to the frontier during the trumpery Schnabele incident. Germany would not mind if war was forced upon her by a 110 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES French attack, and Russia would not move. In February, Prince Hohenlohe, the Governor of Alsace-Lorraine, made a speech to the Provincial Committee which caused a sensation. The statement that Germany might be forced to attack France owing to the menace of a turbulent minority, could evidently not have been made without authority. Pressure had no doubt to be exerted to ensure that the new Reichstag would pass the Army Bill. But the manner of exerting it made Germany, and not France, appear to be the provocative party. On the 22nd March, 1887, the venerable Emperor com¬ pleted his ninetieth year, which began auspiciously, as the Government at last obtained a majority in the Reichstag. Nearly all the German Sovereigns assembled in Berlin for the occasion or sent representatives. The Prince of Wales arrived on the 20th. I had been specially retained to conduct a mechanical waxwork show at Count Radolinski's, with a new and original dialogue prepared for the occasion. All the younger elements in Berlin Society took part in it, and as nothing of the kind had ever been done there before, it was an immense success of hilarity. Most of the traditional public characters in Berlin life were represented and duly wound up, but we had to be very careful not to introduce any items in the programme savouring of Use majeste as the audience was largely composed of monarchs and heirs-apparent. Sir Arthur Sullivan, who had come for a performance of the " Golden Legend," conducted the music for a scene from the " Mikado," which had just then taken Berlin by storm. A night or two afterwards I went to a very merry supper at Herbert Bismarck's. He had engaged a music-hall singer to entertain us, whose repertoire was even more than suggestive. Prince William stood just outside the door, as if disapproving, and withdrew early. The rest of the party, some twenty-six in all, remained till after three a.m. Towards the end of the month Austen Chamberlain paid a visit to Berlin and foregathered with us. Looking back BERLIN, 1885-1886 111 on that first meeting thirty-five years ago, and seeing him after brief intervals repeatedly through the intervening years until the present day with a splendid record behind him, I realize that of all my friends of youth no one has changed so little since we met in my rooms in Berlin in the year of grace 1887. In April I renewed the precedent of spending a portion of my leave in Italy, where I joined my family. In Florence I found my old Oxford friend, Rhoda Broughton, whom I also met again in Venice. I had not been there since '66, when the white-coated Austrian band was still playing in the piazza of St. Mark. The situation with France improved under a Rouvier Government, and Flourens, who had saved the situation during the Schnabele incident, remained at the Foreign Office. Peace, therefore, seemed assured. The Grand Fran£ais, Lesseps, paid a visit to Berlin in the spring. He had grown very old and rather lost his head when talking to the Crown Princess. He launched out into the most violent abuse of Great Britain. " Ceus gueux d'anglais," he said, "nous allons bientot les chasserdel'Egypte." The Crown Princess listened patiently, and when he had finished his tirade said very quietly : " Tres interessant, Monsieur, tout ce que vous venez de me dire, mais n'oubliez pas que je suis une princesse anglaise " ! During the winter the health of the Crown Prince had given rise to considerable anxiety. He could not shake off a long-standing hoarseness which was at first ascribed to a polypus in the throat, and some months in the South had led to no improvement. CHAPTER IV BERLIN, 1887-1888 . The slowly awakening consciousness of rivalry or incompatibility of temperament between Germany and Great Britain received a much greater stimulus at a critical moment than has been generally appreciated in our historical retrospects from circumstances which arose out of the illness of the Crown Prince, from the rivalry of the various medical authorities, and the part played by, or attributed to, the Crown Princess. Having watched from a post of vantage the whole sequence of events until the tragic close of the Emperor Frederick's unhappy three months' reign, I nevertheless find it extremely difficult to arrive at a fair and unprejudiced opinion as to the rights and wrongs of the controversies which raged at the time, and it would be more congenial to pass them by in silence. But a spirit of justice and obligation to those that are gone impels me to record certain incidents and evidences which came within my experience, and which may be of value in correcting misapprehensions. In the first place, it can easily be demonstrated that on one point, which formed the subject of constant misrepre¬ sentation in Germany, the view which found general accept¬ ance there was unfounded. The summoning of an English doctor, Sir Morell Mackenzie, to report on the case was not unnaturally attributed to the influence of the Crown Princess. This presumption was not correct, however welcome the choice may have been to her. The Crown Prince had gone to Ems with his family in April, 1887, to receive treatment for the throat. But 112 BERLIN, 1887-1888 113 no improvement resulted, and in May they returned to Berlin. Late in that month the Crown Princess, who had consented to act as godmother to the child of one of our Secretaries, was to lunch after the ceremony at the Embassy. At the last moment, owing to an aggravation in the symptoms of the Crown Prince, it seemed uncertain whether she could be present. She did, however, come, and was in a very unnerved condition. She then told the Ambassador that the doctors in attendance on the Crown Prince had decided to extirpate the larynx, that there was to be an immediate operation which was not without grave danger. Her reply to a question of Sir Edward's as to the possibility of obtaining a further opinion, expressing ignorance as to the best existing authorities, made it clear that at that moment she had not advocated the summoning of Mackenzie. Almost immediately after this conversation Prince Bismarck camo to see the Ambassador and told him that he had just discovered that the doctors in charge were about to perform a very serious operation on the heir-apparent without consulting either the Emperor or his Chancellor,1 an operation which would even in the most favourable circumstances deprive him permanently of his voice. He spoke with great heat of the presumption of the doctors who had proposed to act without official warrant. He had laid his objections before the Emperor, who had intervened, and, before any final decision was taken, the best specialist advice obtainable was to be called in. There were at the time three eminent authorities on the throat in Europe, but the choice lay between the Austrian and the British. After consideration of their various qualifications the British specialist, whose text-books on the throat were used in German medical schools, had been selected. It was Sir Morell Mackenzie. In view of these communications, of which the Ambassador informed me immediately after they 1 This is confirmed in Bismarck's memoirs, where he states that the doctors had not even intended to inform the Crown Prince him¬ self of the contemplated operation. I 114 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES were made, it seems clear that the Crown Princess was in no way responsible for the original summons. But when the serious and fatal character of the disease was finally estab¬ lished, and the treatment of the case by Mackenzie was violently criticized in Germany, she was universally repre¬ sented as having selected him, nor were those who knew the facts chivalrous enough to correct the misapprehension. How far the influence of the Crown Princess may have been exerted later in retaining Mackenzie in permanent charge of the case I cannot say. But it would have been less than human if she had not strongly desired to have the services of the specialist who, when called in by the highest authority in the State, had declared the critical operation to be unnecessary and had encouraged the hope of ultimate recovery. On the other hand, it was hardly to be anticipated that the overriding of the opinion of the German doctors by that of a foreign expert would meet with unquestioning acquiescence in Germany. Mackenzie removed a small portion of tissue from the part of the throat affected, which was submitted to the scientific analysis of the illustrious physiologist, Virchow, who pronounced the growth not to be of a malignant character. Mackenzie held that it could be removed and that the voice need not be permanently injured. The immediate effect of these announcements was a general feeling of relief. But Professor Bergmann, who had been in charge of the Crown Prince until Mackenzie's arrival, did not alter his opinion. It was afterward^ asserted, when the medical controversy reached its bitterest stage, that Mackenzie had taken the section for analysis from the healthy and not from the diseased portion of the throat, and he was accused of having done so deliberately in order to secure a favourable verdict. In any case, for some time after this experiment the accounts of the Crown Prince's health became more reassuring, and he was able to go with his family to England and later to Scotland, and to take a prominent part in the celebration of the Jubilee of Queen Victoria. There all eyes were centred BERLIN, 1887-1888 115 upon him not less on account of his splendid presence as he rode in the procession than because of the universal sympathy felt for his position at a moment when the vitality of the old Emperor was visibly declining. In the month of June the Emperor had been seriously ill. A few days after the circumstances referred to I dined with Herbert Bismarck at a little party of eight which he gave in honour of the American Ambassador, Mr. Pendleton. No reference was made to the subject, but the occasion remains memorable to me from the fact that as Mr. Pendleton knew no other language, conversation throughout the evening was carried on exclusively in English, and it impressed me not a little that the six Germans present should speak the language with such absolute facility. Among them was Holstein, who eventually became the Eminence grise of the German Foreign Office and who was regarded as one of the ablest men in the public service. In those days very few of the diplomatic body ever came across him personally, for he never went into the world and sought for no distinctions. Holstein claimed that he was just an old bachelor, and wished to be treated as such. But I believe that he had his distractions out of school. He had been used by Bismarck in former times to keep his rival Arnim under observation, and, though he had behaved quite frankly and had warned Arnim as to his instructions, he was no doubt sensible of a certain odium which attached to such an ungrateful mission. On Bismarck's retirement Holstein did not withdraw from public life ; he adhered to the new regime, and refused an invitation to Count Herbert Bismarck's farewell official dinner. Under Baron Marschall von Bieberstein he became the dominant factor in the Wilhelmstrasse, where he exercised a sinister influence against any rapprochement with Great Britain. That evening he made use of a rather suggestive phrase to me when I was rallying him about his unsociability. He said " Das Staatsleben hat mich als Mensch verdorben "—the service of the State has spoiled me as a human being. These 116 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES words well described not a few of the old-fashioned civil servants. They were extremely efficient, but inclined, through the life they made for themselves, vivendi perdere causas. The State or the profession absorbed men so wholly that there seemed to be no room left for the amenities of intercourse. The official of those days had become a member of a privileged caste, and took his colour from the hierarchy under which he served, behaving to the public rather as a master than as a servant. I remember Bismarck saying one day that the freedom of personal relations in England, especially those between opposing political parties, was a condition which he envied. In Germany it was not possible. The professional and military classes were necessarily antagonistic, and so long as Germany occupied a critical position as the " middle-point " of Europe, surrounded by enemies or doubtful friends, the military element must continue to predominate. This attitude of mind seems to account for much which later experience has revealed. In July, 1887, I paid a fortnight's visit to England, and found a number of my friends, who were now generally designated as the Souls, engrossed in the study of Ethics, with a young girl-gradute from Newnham lecturing to them. They were discussing the most comprehensive problems of philosophy with pleasant irresponsibility, though some of them seemed very much in earnest. That young generation of beautiful and clever women, the complement to a group of brilliant men, whose unconstrained relations had broken down many of the barriers of mid-Victorian convention, were a remarkable manifestation of the last decades of the nineteenth century, and in a wide experience of many countries I have never met any section of society more interesting or more charming. What remained of the old conventions has now long disappeared and a new social order has replaced it. But what has become of the quick humour and the intellectual brilliancy which characterized the first revolutionary movement ? I joined a delightful party at Ashridge, where a certain number of the group BERLIN, 1887-1888 117 were assembled as guests of the most ideal hosts of that spacious old-world English life, together with others of the old order for contrast, and among them my Oxford friend, Rhoda Broughton. Harry Oust, who was there, seemed to bear her no ill-will on account of a recent volume, the much courted but not impeccable hero of which was regarded by a number of friends as having a not wholly accidental resemblance to himself. After returning to Berlin I paid a brief visit to the fine old house of the Konigsmarks at Plaue on the Havel, where they showed me drawers full of letters from Maurice de Saxe written to his mother, Aurora Konigsmark, in French, not very decipherable, which I understood had never been published or even examined from an historical point of view. There was a portrait of Sophia Dorothea's murdered lover, but I did not see any records of the gallant captain of adventure who fought for Venice in Morosini's great campaign against the Turks in Morea. He belonged, it is true, to a Swedish branch of the family. The Am¬ bassador also took Reggie Lister and myself to Dresden to see for the first time a complete performance of the " Ring." Our visit was, however, quite a private one, for we maintained a separate representative at the Court of Saxony, and we only devoted ourselves to sightseeing. I took a particular interest in the series of residential pavilions constructed for the mistresses of the great lover whom Carlyle has labelled as " Augustus the physically strong." A former member of the Legation at Dresden told me a pleasant story of the surprise and amusement of the old King of Saxony at the unceremonious address of an American traveller who had been invited to a ball at Court. He had been duly presented at the cercle and, after watching the proceedings for a while, he approached the sovereign and observed : " You ain't dancing much, King. Let me introduce my daughter. She don't know many people here." In the late autumn my old friend Sir William Richmond 118 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES arrived at the Embassy. He was to paint the portraits of the Ambassador and Ambassadress, the former in full dress uniform. We arranged an improvised lay figure to hold the heavy gold embroidered coat and, the trouble which it gave the artist reminded me of what Millais once said about Watts : " A great artist, full of ideas and imagination, but the trouble with him is that he has not painted enough buttons in his life." If this formal portrait was not one of Richmond's successes, he was a great success himself, and Malet, who had an instinctive sympathy with the unconventional and the Bohemian, asked Bismarck to allow Richmond to paint him. The Chancellor not only consented but invited him to stay at Friederichsruhe, a privilege which few enjoyed. He was to go there for three days, but he remained for ten and the family wished to detain him even longer. Richmond arrived about mid-day in November at the ancient and rather cheerless house in the country of the primeval Saxons, and was beginning to feel marooned in his big room looking over a lake and the endless forest, when he became aware of a tall black figure standing in the doorway and then advancing to meet him, speaking somewhat shyly in English. " Edward Malet," he said, " whom I have known ever since he was a boy, when his father was at Frankfort, has asked me to do this, and there are few things he should ask me which I would not do for him." Then he shook hands. The veteran statesman and the artist at once got on famously. Malet was the link. The Chancellor seemed really devoted to him and gave as one of his reasons : " Edward Malet could not tell a lie, not even a political one." This was, therefore, a quality which he could admire—in others ! At lunch he said : " I would like you to show me to the English people as I really am, as a man of heart, whose self-control is all learned and not by nature." One of the first lessons in disguising his feelings he had learned, he said, when he was sent to school at six by his mother, who was a hard, ambitious BERLIN, 1887-1888 119 woman. He could still remember his home sickness and his longing to return to his father. The schoolmaster found him crying, but he would not tell the real reason, and said he had a pain in his stomach. The great dog which always accompanied the Chancellor lay beside him on the floor during meals, and the great man would toss anything for which he did not care from his own plate to the Reichshund. The first evening Richmond dressed for dinner. Bismarck, who was not dressed, looked at him and said : "You have done us a great honour to have dressed yourself for dinner. I have not in my possession such a thing as a tail-coat. So I will ask you for the rest of the time to excuse yourself the trouble of dressing." There was a charming courtesy and a genial humanity in the old man, where business of State was not concerned. But, as I have found to be the case with the majority of Prussian officials, there were two distinct personalities; and, gracious and kindly as he might reveal himself to be in private relations, the Chancellor in public affairs was ruthless, inexorable and unscrupulous. He would sit up long after dinner talking and smoking his long-stemmed pipe. He asked innumerable questions about England, where there was much that he did not understand. He had his opinions regarding our politicians. He described Gladstone as having the venom of eloquence. "He cuts down trees," Bismarck said; "I try to plant some." This seems to have been a favourite figure of speech with him, for I remember his using it in conversation with Malet, when the press had spoken of a possible visit of Gladstone to Germany, and Malet asked him if he would not be interested in meeting a statesman whose career had run on contemporary lines to his own. " No," Bismarck replied, " I would rather not meet him. I feel he would talk me round against my will. Our respective attitudes in life are diametrically opposed. He spends his time in cutting down trees, and I in planting them." The observation had its literal as well as its figurative significance. 120 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES Besides the portrait head in oils in which he succeeded in presenting the Chancellor in his more benevolent aspect, Richmond did some extremely interesting pencil studies of the veteran in his home life. Aften ten days he had to return to finish his work in Berlin, where every one was depressed and anxious at the grave reports from San Remo of the Crown Prince's condition. In view of coming struggles there was something suggestive in the words which the Chancellor had used to Richmond: " When I was young I was an arrogant egoist—but there was a fire within me, and it is not quenched yet." The last night at dinner he said : "I hope I shall live to see my ambition of forty years realized, Germany with the strongest army in Europe, quite unassailable; England with the strongest navy, mistress of the seas ; the two nations together, and then peace. To that let us drink ! " It is possible that these glimpses of the Chancellor's private life have been recorded elsewhere. As I made notes of them directly they were told me they have the interest of actuality. The political situation that autumn became very interest¬ ing. The Italian Prime Minister, Crispi, paid a visit to Berlin. He had succeeded Depretis, who died in the summer after a long leadership from 1876 to 1886, a typical demo¬ cratic statesman, who possessed nothing but a little four- roomed house in his native place, Stradella, and lodged on the fourth floor up 120 steps in Rome. Depretis had associated his old opponent Crispi in the administration, and the Sicilian became his inevitable successor. With his visit the existence of an alliance between Germany, Austria and Italy became matter of public report. An ephemeral Spanish-Italian Mediterranean understanding appeared to supplement it and there were rumours of a possible further accord. The Chancellor's policy had succeeded in completely isolating France. Crispi's arrival and the interest aroused in the alliance were the occasion of an interesting story which was told me by George von Bunsen. Victor Emmanuel II paid a visit to Berlin not long BERLIN, 1887-1888 121 before his death. His first words to the old Emperor as he drove with him from the station were : " The Emperor Napoleon was my greatest friend. He did for me and for my country what I could never repay. When war was declared between Germany and France (in 1870) I wanted to help him. I would have helped him, but I was told that it would cost me my crown. That is all over and he is gone, and now I can be your true friend." The old Emperor appreciated his perfect blunt frankness and said that he loved the man for it. There followed a visit from the Russian Emperor designed to reinvigorate the cordiality of relations which had long been cooling. The Grand Duke Nicholas had recently made a violent anti-German speech in a French warship. The Chancellor, in a conversation with my chief in the latter part of November, informed him of the intention again to increase the army, which would be brought up to a war footing of four millions. He now felt, he said, that war was inevitable for them, both on the eastern and on the western side, in a few years' time. When it came they must either conquer or disappear. They could never pay for the four million men except by success. On the first day of mobilization they would require eight hundred millions sterling. They had one hundred and twenty at Spandau. But the addition to the army was a vital necessity. At an interview which took place between Bismarck and the Russian Emperor it came out that the latter had been furnished with a number of letters and documents purporting to be communications from Prince Reuss, the Ambassador at Vienna, to Prince Ferdinand of Bulgaria, with reference to Bismarck's attitude towards the princi¬ pality, which, had they been genuine, would have given His Majesty ample reason to mistrust the Chancellor. These documents were now ascertained to have been forgeries from beginning to end. This source of irritation was, therefore, eliminated by the visit. An inspired communica¬ tion was made to the Kolnische Zeitung on the subject 122 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES without mention of the names of the supposed corres¬ pondents. It stated that the source of these forgeries was easily discovered. It was of Orleanist origin. Such a suggestion would seem to have been meant to indicate Princess Clementine, the mother of the Prince of Bulgaria. But it is quite possible that this suggestion was only put forward to conceal from the guilty parties that investigation was on the right track, and suspicion rather fell on a Russian war-party. The same evidently inspired article also stated that the interview had revealed to the Chancellor that a small but influential section of the Court in Berlin had been endeavouring to instil into the Czar the impression that Bismarck and the German Emperor were not by any means always in accord, and that he had only secured a very reluctant consent from his imperial master to a recent policy less friendly to Russia. Now, the explanation of this concluding passage of the article current behind the scenes in Berlin is interesting in itself, and if correct it also affords one more of the many instances which show how the Chancellor made use of the press for his own personal objects. At a Court dinner which took place during the visit of the Russian Emperor the table was in horse-shoe form. In the middle sat the Kaiser with the Czar and Czarina on either hand and the other princes and princesses to his right and left. Exactly opposite the German Emperor on the inner circle was the Lord High Chamberlain, Count Stolberg-Wernigerode. Prince Bismarck was given a place on the outer circle beyond the princes, and thus well out of range of the Russian guests. He was indignant at this placing, and claimed that he ought to have sat opposite the Kaiser. Count Perponcher, who was responsible, contended that his disposition of places was perfectly correct, as the dinner had been announced to be a family and not an official party. This contention, however, the Chancellor would not accept, and he was reported to have informed Count Stolberg by letter that he ought to have refused to take the place assigned to him. BERLIN, 1887-1888 123 The Chancellor's claim was, I think, valid, because custom prescribed that, when a foreign sovereign was the guest of the Crown, the Minister for Foreign Affairs should take his place opposite the Sovereign, and Bismarck, as Chan¬ cellor, was actually also Minister for Foreign Affairs. On this occasion it was from his point of view of special im¬ portance that the precedent should be observed, and that he should not have been placed in a position of inferiority, which might lead the Czar to believe that there was some truth in the assertion that Emperor and Chancellor were not altogether at one in their policy towards Russia. A characteristic story, illustrating Herbert Bismarck's brusque and bull-headed manner, was told in connexion with this visit. If not true it was ben trovato. When the Russian Imperial train arrived the royal carriage was arrested at some little distance from the spot where the Minister for Foreign Affairs was waiting. He dashed down the platform as the Emperor was alighting, and with a rough sweep of his arm pushed aside one or two Russian chamberlains standing at the carriage door, saying as he did so : " Pardon, je suis le Comte Bismarck." At which one of them was heard to remark : " Qa explique mais n'excuse pas." In the early autumn the Crown Prince and his family had gone to the Tyrol and northern Italy, but with the approach of winter they moved to San Remo. Sir Morell Mackenzie was summoned to Villa Zirio and save for a brief interval he remained with his patient till his death. On November the 12th the Official Gazette announced, though not in a signed bulletin, that the Crown Prince's illness had a " carcinomatous " character. This announce¬ ment was not made in the form of a bulletin, and was not signed by any doctor. It was not until the following February that a medical report to this effect was issued. The notice in the Gazette becomes significant in connexion with certain circumstances which will be referred to later, and it appeared to be not unconnected with certain semi¬ official visits paid at this time to San Remo. 124 SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES The year 1888 opened with the sense of ominous events inevitably approaching. The first day of the year was a trying one in Berlin, as it is in all those continental cities where custom prescribes that cards should be left on th THE ASSAULT ON MOUNT EVEREST, 1922. By Brig.-General the Hon. C. G. BRUCE and other members oe the expedition. Medium 8vo. With 32 full-page illustrations, a photogravure frontispiece and maps. 25s. net. This magnificent volume contains the narrative of the stupendous climbs in which the height of 27,000 feet was reached, thus eclipsing all previous records. The achievements of Mallory, Norton, Somervell and Morshead in the first climbing party, and of Finch and Geoffrey Bruce in the second, were only possible for men of splendid physique and enormous powers of endurance, and demanded very perfect organization on the part of the leader of the expedition. The use of oxygen apparatus was seriously tested for the first time and produced results of great scientific importance. A third great climb later in the season was unfortunately interrupted by the terrible avalanche which overwhelmed the party soon after the start, resulting in the sad death of several of the Tibetan porters. All the arrangements for the successful conduct of the expedition, the supply of mules and porters, the negotiations with the Tibetan authorities en route, the great Base Camp and the smaller Camps higher up the mountain involved an enormous amount of work and the utmost tact in surmounting difficulties and obstacles; these are described by General Bruce and provide most enter¬ taining reading. The photographs are, if possible, even more wonderful than those in the previous work, and the map of the 2 Edward Arnold 6c Co.'s Autumn Announcements. country has been thoroughly revised in the light of the latest experience. It is betraying no secret to say that the result of the 1922 expedition has been to stimulate the desire for a third attempt to complete the trilogy—first the Reconnaissance, next the Assault, and finally let us hope the Conquest of the great mountain. MOUNT EVEREST: THE RECONNAISSANCE, 1921. By Col. HOWARD- BURY, D.S.O., and others. With Maps and Illustrations. 25s. net. Copies of this important work are still obtainable. Also a limited Large Paper Edition, with additional plates. Quarto. £5 5s. Od. net. SOCIAL AND DIPLOMATIC MEMORIES 1894-1901. By the Right Hon. Sir J. RENNELL RODD, G.C.B. One Volume. Demy 8vo. With Portrait. 21s.net. " The first volume * of Sir Rennell Rodd's Memories makes us eager for the second " was the general verdict on the instalment of the work published in 1922. Sir Rennell Rodd was appointed as second in command to Lord Cromer in Egypt in 1894, and remained there for eight years—the period covered by his new volume. Two of the most interesting chapters in the book contain a narrative of the Mission to Abyssinia in 1897, and the account of the " King of Bangs " with his picturesque court and army and the wonderful reception of the British envoys is extraordinarily vivid and roman¬ tic. All the great Englishmen who were making history in Egypt at the time, including Lord Cromer, Lord Kitchener, Sir Reginald Wingate, Sir Francis Grenfell and others, figure largely in Sir Rennell Rodd's pages. In 1898 came the advance into the Sudan, culminating in the Battle of Omdurman, of which a very spirited first-hand description is given by Lieut. Reymond de Montmorency. The difficulties with France caused by Capt. Marchand's occupation of Fashoda are described in considerable detail, and afford an admirable example of the value of skilled Diplomacy in handling delicate international situations. The death of the Mahdi in 1899 finally put an end to our troubles in the Soudan, but the succeeding years were by no means pleasant ones for the British in Egypt so long as the outcome of the South African War appeared uncer¬ tain. Sir Rennell Rodd left Cairo in 1901, not to return until 1919 when he visited Egypt again as a member of the Milner Mission. * "Social and Diplomatic Memories, 1884-1893." Second Impression. 21s. net. Edward Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. 3 THE LIFE OF THE RIGHT HON. GENERAL SIR REDVERS BULLER, G.C.B., G.C.M.G., V.C. By Col. C. H. MELVILLE, C.M.G. In two Volumes. Demy 8vo. With Portrait and Maps. 32s. net. Sir Rcdvers Buller will always be remembered as the General in command during the early stages of the South African War, when the battles of Colenso, Spion Kop and Pieters Hill were fought during the operations for the relief of Lady smith. But his military career covered a period of many years and he took a prominent part in nearly all the campaigns of the British Army from 1860 to 1900. He entered the 60th Rifles in 1858 and first saw service in China. He accompanied Lord Wolseley on the interesting Red River Expedition and in the Ashanti War. He was engaged in the Kaffir War of 1878 and the subsequent Zulu War. He was Chief of the Staff in the Boer War of 1881. He was present at the battles of Tel-el-Kebir and Kassassin in Egypt, and Chief of the Staff in the Gordon Relief Expedition, 1884-85. Then came a period of Home Service at the War Office and Aldershot, and an inter¬ lude when he filled the post of Under-Secretary in Ireland. After the South African War he commanded the First Army Corps at Aldershot, and finally retired from the Army in 1906, two years before he died. Thus it will be seen that a Memoir of Sir Redvers Buller is in itself an epitome of British military history—always excepting India where he never saw service—from the time of the Mutiny to the quiet years preceding the Great War. On the personal side Buller appears as a man of indomitable courage and perseverance, always ready to take the hardest tasks on his own shoulders, and ever thoughtful of the comfort and welfare of his men. His was a lovable character too ; never was he so happy as in his own Devon¬ shire home with his wife and family, among the people who adored him. He was a man of the type that has made England great and of whom his country may be justly proud. STRAY RECOLLECTIONS. By Major-General Sir C. E. CALLWELL, K.C.B., Author o? " Experiences of a Dug-Out," etc. Two Volumes. Demy 8vo. 32s. net. These volumes contain a military autobiography of great interest. The Author entered the Royal Military Academy, Woolwich, in 1876, * 4 Edward Arnold c& Co.'s Autumn Announcements. and his career is a typical example of the life of an officer in the British Army from that date to the time of the Great War. The book will recall to many a veteran the scenes among which the best and happiest days of his life were passed, the irresponsible adventures of the Subaltern, the stern realities, not without com¬ pensating advantages, of service in India and South Africa, the less exciting but highly important work in the Intelligence Depart¬ ment and the War Office. General Callwell possesses an original and observant mentality, and has a delightful facility in narrative. He is always on the alert for what is entertaining and worth notic¬ ing, and makes the best use of his frequent opportunities for describ¬ ing a dramatic incident or telling a good story. Without in any way posiug as a military critic, he manages to convey his views upon many crucial Army matters, and is nearly always convincing. He cannot conceal his repugnance to the introduction of Politics into the arena of war, but recognizes that modern conditions render it impossible to avoid their overlapping. PALESTINE AND MOROCCO. By Sir W. MARTIN CONWAY, M.P. Author of "The Alps from End to End," "The Bolivian Andes," etc. Demy 8vo. Illustrated. Probable price, 16s. net. Morocco and Palestine possess this in common, that in both, at the present time, the ancient oriental civilization is being im¬ pinged upon by the inroad of modern Western ideals and develop¬ ments. In Morocco the French are the innovators, in Palestine the Jews. The author visited the two countries in succession with a view of studying the conditions thus created. His pre¬ possessions are in favour of the old Orient, and his endeavour has been to depict it and to show the effect of the modern world upon it. Incidentally in the case of Morocco he describes the journey through that country from stage to stage as he made it. Palestine is too well known to need such description, but the actual nature of the country is a main factor in the political problem and receives as much attention as space permits. WILD ANIMALS IN CENTRAL INDIA. By A. A. DUNBAR BRANDER, F.Z.S., Conservator of Forests. Demy 8vo. With 16 pages of illustrations. 18s. net. This interesting book is dedicated by permission to H.R.H. The Duke of Connaught, for whom the Author organized a shooting expedition in India a few years ago. Mr. Dunbar Brander is one Edward Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. 5 of the greatest living authorities in all that pertains to jungle and shikar lore in central India, and is also a highly-qualified naturalist. He has had more than twenty years' experience in the Forest Ser¬ vice, and has made the most of his unequalled opportunities. As Mr. Kipling has well said, the Forest Officer grows wise in more than wood-lore : he meets tiger, bear, leopard, and all the deer, not once or twice after days of beating, but again and again in the execution of his duty. The book is compiled almost entirely from personal notes and observations, and aims at describing the habits and characters of animals in such a way as to supply useful information to the field naturalist and to the sportsman who takes an intelligent interest in his quarry. All the principal game animals of India are fully dealt with, including tiger, leopard, buffalo, bison, sloth bear, wild dog, wild pig, sambar, barasingha, Chital deer, antelopes and various other denizens of the jungle. The illustrations are from photographs taken by the author on the spot. JAPAN AND HER COLONIES. By POULTNEY BIGELOW. One Volume. Demy 8vo. With eight full-page illustrations. 15s. net. The author of this book has been known for many years on both sides of the Atlantic as an enterprising traveller ; he has studied, at first hand and on the spot, the characteristics, political, social and economic, of many lands in Europe and Asia, and more recently was one of the first to enlighten his fellow-countrymen in the United States as to the origin of the Great War (which he had foreseen and foretold) and to bring home to them that it was a contest in which their own interests were vitally concerned, and by which their own ideals were imperilled. He was in Japan as long ago as 1876, and again in 1898. Two years ago he paid a third visit, accompanied by his wife, and here records the results of his investigations. They were devoted principally to the work of Japan in her newly acquired possessions, Formosa, Korea and Shantung, of which he draws a very favourable and attractive picture. Incidentally he deals with the whole problem of the Pacific, and has much advice to give to his countrymen, couched in remarkably trenchant and outspoken terms, on their attitude towards world politics. Though his aims are serious, he writes in a light and readable style, and gives us plenty of amusing inci¬ dents and anecdotes, and several lively sketches of the outstanding personalities among Japanese administrators. 6 Edward Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. ANIMAL LIFE IN DESERTS. A STUDY OF THE FAUNA IN RELATION TO THE ENVIRONMENT. By Dr. P. A. BUXTON. Formerly Fellow oe Trinity College, Cambridge ; Medical Ento¬ mologist, Government of Palestine. With numerous illustrations. Demy 8vo. 10s. 6d. net. This volume is the result of several years' study of the conditions of desert life in Algeria, North-West Persia, Southern Palestine and Mesopotamia, and the author has endeavoured to summarize his own observations and to elucidate their meaning by comparison with what has been observed in other deserts. The desert is an environment unspoilt by the hand of man, so that one can more clearly observe the interaction of plant and animal life upon each other, but, on the other hand, we are ignorant of certain details of the climatology of deserts and of the life-history of the great majority of the smaller animals. The extent to which nearly all forms of animal and plant life are modified to enable them to exist in these more or less hostile conditions is naturally greater than it is in more favoured parts of the globe and renders their accurate observation more difficult. It is partly in order to sum¬ marize our present knowledge and to draw attention to the graver deficiencies in it that the book has been written. It is hoped that this study of the desert creatures and their environment which leads one to a very fascinating meeting-place of several sciences, will prove interesting to many who delight in natural history, but who have never had an opportunity to make themselves acquainted with the more formal aspects of zoology. A HANDBOOK OF THE CONIFERS AND GINKGOACE^E. By W. DALLIMORE, Assistant at the Royal Gardens, Kew, and A. B. JACKSON, A.L.S. With 32 full-page plates and over 100 illustrations in the text. One Volume about 600 pages. Medium 8vo. 42s. net. This book contains descriptions in easily understood terms of all the cone-bearing trees with information upon their economic uses and cultivation. The need for such a book has long been felt, for although groups of conifers have been described elsewhere, the family has not been Edunrd Arnold & Co. 's Autumn Announcements. 7 exhaustively dealt with in a single volume for many years. More¬ over the number of new species introduced during the present century makes necessary a review of the whole group. Although the book is primarily a general work upon Conifers, special attention has been given to those that are hardy in the British Isles or are of outstanding economic importance. A feature of the work is the series of keys to genera and species which are designed to assist beginners in the work of identification. The families Taxacece, Pinacece and Ginkgoacece, are separately treated, the genera and species being alphabetically arranged. Following a short generic description each species is dealt with, giving the scientific name with authority and the most important common name. Then come scientific and common synonyms, followed by a botanical description, the geographical distribution, date of introduction, economic uses and cultivation, with one or more references to the plant in other works. About 115 natural size line-drawings by Miss G. Lister add considerable value to the descriptions, whilst 32 full-page photographs illustrate woodland scenery and specimen trees. The descriptions have been drawn up from living plants or herbarium specimens in the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. FOUNDERS OF OCEANOGRAPHY AND THEIR WORK. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SCIENCE OF THE SEA. By Sir WILLIAM HERDMAN, F.R.S. With about 60 Illustrations. One Volume. Demy 8vo. 21s. net. Sir William Herdman is one of the most famous of living oceano- graphers ; he has lived through the period that has seen the development of the Natural History of the Sea into the Science of Oceanography, and has known intimately most of the men who did the pioneer work. His book may be roughly divided into two sections. The first few chapters are biographical sketches of the pioneers of oceano¬ graphy, in which are recorded the author's personal impressions of these men and their work : Edward Forbes, the Manx Naturalist, the pioneer of shallow-water dredging ; Wyville Thomson and John Murray and the work of the Challenger expedition ; Louis and Alexander Agassiz, the founders of American Oceanography ; and finally the late Prince of Monaco, whose practical interest in deep-sea exploration has done so much to advance knowledge. The second section deals with subjects rather than men, and here the author has chosen those matters in which he himself is particularly interested. He starts with an account of the various 8 Edward Arnold <£ Co.'s Autumn Announcements. oceans, the influence on marine life of their salinity, depth and temperature. This is followed by a fascinating study of the various deep-sea deposits and a chapter on Coral Islands with a survey of the various theories that have been advanced to explain their formation. He then discusses the various causes of luminescence in the sea. Finally there are chapters on plankton or floating life of the sea, on oyster and mussel cultivation and on the sea- fisheries. Oceanography has many practical applications in connection with our sea-fisheries and the cultivation of our barren shores, and is a subject which should appeal specially to a maritime people like the British, who owe everything to the sea. The volume is beautifully illustrated and is full of interest for the general reader as well as for the student. BRITISH HYMENOPTERA. By A. S. BUCKHURST, L. N. STANILAND, and G. B. WATSON. With an introduction by Professor H. Maxwell Lefroy. One Volume, Grown Quarto. With many illustrations. 9s. net. An introduction to the study of the habits and life-histories of British Saw-Flies, Wood-Wasps, Gail-Flies, Ichneumon-Flies, Ruby- Wasps, Digger-Wasps, Mud-Wasps, Wasps, Bees, and Ants. Suffi¬ cient information is given for their identification and technical terms are carefully explained. The authors aim at interesting all those interested in the study of insects, and who require a volume more accurate than the wholly-popular romantic works and yet less technical than a systematic treatise. DRAWINGS BY GUERCINO. Edited by ARCHIBALD G. B. RUSSELL, BA., F.S.A., Lancaster Herald. Author of "The Engravings of William Blake," etc. One Volume. Quarto. Finely printed. 25s. net. The Edition is limited to 500 numbered copies for sale. The book will be illustrated by twenty-four reproductions of Guercino's drawings which have been carefully selected with a view to representing the various aspects of the Artist's genius by the finest possible examples. The Royal collection at Windsor, the British Museum and several important private collections have been drawn upon for this purpose. The Editor, Mr. Archibald G. B. Russell, Lancaster Herald, well Edward Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. 9 known as an authority upon the drawings of the Old Masters, will contribute a study of the Artist's life and work, together with notes upon the illustrations. Guercino's drawings which enjoyed an immense reputation in the eighteenth century, a large number of them being engraved in facsimile by Bartolozzi and other eminent engravers of the period, have since that date passed through a time of comparative neglect among collectors, due in part to the temporary eclipse in the public esteem suffered by the whole Bolognese School and in part to the absence of fine examples upon the market. The recent dispersal of a notable group of drawings from the collection of the late Lord Northwick and of the matchless series (probably with that at Wind¬ sor the finest that has ever been brought together) lately in the possession of the Earl of Gainsborough, from whose cabinet they can be traced back to a nephew of the Artist, has however done much to contribute to the present revival of interest in his work. The finest of these drawings which have lately been the subject of a very interesting exhibition at the Burlington Fine Arts Club, are to be included among the illustrations of the forthcoming volume. The book accordingly will have a special value, not only for collectors of Old Master Drawings, but for all lovers of Fine Art. It should also make a particular appeal to artists in view of Guer¬ cino's brilliant use of the various mediums employed in his sketches. Their influence has already been far-reaching, and it is certain that the beauty of his pen and wash drawings left a deep impress upon the work of Tiepolo, who is known to have formed a collection of them and to have held them in the highest regard. PAINTING IN THE FAR EAST. By LAURENCE BINYON, Deputy Keeper, in charge of Oriental Prints and Drawings, British Museum. Third Edition. With Frontispiece in colour and forty-one full- page plates. Medium 8vo. 30s. net. The last edition of this book was published in the year before the War broke out discolouring all our minds and interdicting for so long the pursuits of peaceful study. In spite of the world's material convulsions, however, interest in Oriental art everywhere gained ground ; and during these years notable works in one aspect or another of the subject have been published, and valuable addi¬ tions have been made to European and American collections, though these perhaps have been less important in the domain of painting than of sculpture. In preparing this new edition, therefore, a good deal of revision 10 Edward Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. has been necessary, and a certain amount of fresh matter has been incorporated. It is especially in the chapters on early Chinese painting and in that on " Ukiyo-ye and the Colour-Print " that new material and new information have had to be taken into account. The number of illustrations has been slightly increased. Two or three plates which appeared in the second edition have been replaced by other subjects ; and there has been added as frontis¬ piece a coloured reproduction from a beautiful small Sung painting in the famous collection of Mr. George Eumorfopoulos, to whom the author is greatly indebted for permission to use it. THE ANALYSIS OF THE HUNTING FIELD. By R. S. SURTEES. With reproductions of the original Plates by H. Alken. A new Edition. Crown 4to. 21s. net. " The Analysis of the Hunting Field " is a series of lively sketches of the various personages found there. Originally written for Bell's Life to commemorate the exceptionally good season of 1845- 46, it is not usually grouped with the novels of Surtees, although, apart from the fact that there is no connected tale run¬ ning through the chapters, it presents all the characteristic features of the novels and will delight the general reader no less than the hunting man. A recent subscription edition of Surtees' works does not include either " Jorrocks' Jaunts and Jollities " or " The Analysis of the Hunting Field," and it is anticipated that possessors of this set will be glad to make their collections more complete by adding this new edition of the latter work. Robert Smith Surtees is one of the puzzles of literature. Considered by some as being the greatest fiction humorist of his day, he is at the same time comparatively little known to the general reader. But it is safe to say that whoever makes the acquaintance of this capti¬ vating storyteller of English country life, with his hilarious and joyous tales of fox-hunting, horse-dealing, racing, dimiers, dances and flirtations, will not rest content until he has read everything Surtees produced with so much bounce and gusto. And no better volume need be selected to start with than " The Analysis of the Hunting Field." It contains coloured plates after Henry Alken —most popular of sporting artists—and while it would be invidious Edivard Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. 11 to compare the merits of his work with that of Leech, who suc¬ ceeded him as illustrator of Surtees' books, it is noteworthy that first editions containing Aiken plates fetch much higher prices in the sale room than those illustrated by the later artist. SEAMANSHIP FOR YACHTSMEN. By F. B. COOKE. Author of " The Corinthian Yachtsman's Hand-book," " Single-handed Cruising," etc. One Volume. Demy 8vo. Illustrated. 12s. 6d. net. The success which has attended the publication of Mr. Cooke's previous books ensures a cordial welcome for this, his latest work on Yachting. He writes mainly for the owners of small yachts, and gives eminently practical advice, from knowledge gained in the hard school of experience, as to all the different occasions where seamanship comes into play. Chapters are devoted to Getting under Way, Seamanship under Way, Heavy Weather, Bringing up, Moorings, Stowing away, Running Aground, Accidents, Strange Harbours, Rule of the Road, Racing Tactics, and other kindred topics. The whole book teems with useful information, and illus¬ trations are freely used whenever they are required to elucidate the text. RELIGIO MILITIS. By AUSTIN HOPKINSON, M.P. One Volume. Probable price, 7s. 6d. net. This book is an attempt by one, who has taken an active part in the politics, wars and industry of the country, to explain what the generation to which he belongs really believes. He endeavours to show that the pessimism of the twentieth century is no more to be justified than the thoughtless optimism of the nineteenth, and that the effect of the war has been to imbue a large number of our young men with an intense, but unspoken, religious faith, which may well give rise to a great improvement of political and of industrial conditions in the near future. Like Mithraism, the soldiers' religion of the early part of the Christian era, this faith is dualistic. It accepts the reality of a never-ending struggle between moral beings and a non-moral cosmic process, and tends 12 Edward Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. to associate Evil with the crowd, while it holds Good to be the attribute of the individual. Thus it becomes the basis of the Aristocratic Principle—that the well-being of the many can be secured only by self-sacrifice of the few. The extreme subjectivism of this outlook is, the author believes, strongly supported by the work of the physical relativitists, and he endeavours to show that it in no way runs counter to the teaching of the synoptic Gospels. But his determination ruthlessly to tear away all those accretions with which institutional religion has somewhat obscured primitive Christianity, may possibly raise a protest from orthodox churchmen. The book is no mere splitting of metaphysical hairs, but a sincere attempt to justify the extreme idealism which the author has advocated and which he has put into actual practice in dealing with industrial and political problems. Indeed, he expressly disclaims any skill or training in metaphysics, and describes in the simplest and clearest language possible what, for better or for worse, is the faith of his generation. GERMAN STRATEGY IN THE GREAT WAR. By Brevet Lieut.-Colonel PHILIP NEAME, V.C., D.S.O., Royal Engineers. One Volume. Demy 8vo. With numerous Maps. 10s. 6d. net. The author has based this book on lectures he gave recently to officers at the Staff College, Camberley. Although intended primarily for military students, it is a work of absorbing interest for the general reader. In fourteen short chapters, Colonel Neame discusses the strategical operations of each phase of the war, out¬ lining the plans of the General Staff, describing the actual move¬ ments that took place and indicating the causes of success or failure. His estimate of the characters of the different commanders and their influence on the course of events is most illuminating, and the book is full of suggestive inquiries as to how far the issues would have been affected had different dispositions been made. There is a valuable series of seventeen carefully prepared maps, specially drawn to illustrate the critical phases of the campaigns, and it is confidently anticipated that the work will form an invalu¬ able hand-book for all students of strategy in the Great War for many years to come. Edward Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. 13 OVER THE BALKANS AND SOUTH RUSSIA. BEING THE HISTORY OF NO. 47 SQUAD¬ RON, ROYAL AIR FORCE. By H. A. JONES, M.C. With an Introduction by Air Vice-Marshal Sir W. G. H. SALMOND, K.C.M.G., C.B., D.S.O. One Volume. Demy 8vo. With Maps and Illustrations. 10s. 6d. net. Squadron No. 47 has a record of a high standard of efficiency. The Squadron tackled whole-heartedly any job that came its way. And those jobs were diverse. It was formed at Beverley in May, 1916, and left for Macedonia in September of that year. For the next three years, in the Balkans and South Russia, it had little rest. Its work, under the extraordinary conditions which marked the progress of the Macedonian Campaign, is here told in detail, with many intimate little pen pictures of people who played their part and passed on. The story of the Battle of Doiran, as it is here written, will, it is hoped, do something towards ensuring justice for a singularly fine feat of British arms. After the convention with Bulgaria was signed, No. 47 was ordered against the Turks in the direction of Constantinople. But Turkey also went out of the war. Then came Denikin's campaign against the Bolsheviks. Once more 47 was on the move. The story of that ill-fated campaign is told briefly but clearly. Briga¬ dier-General A. C. Maund, C.B.E., D.S.O., who commanded the Air Force in South Russia, writes of this part of the history, " It is one of the most accurate descriptions I have ever read." By the courtesy of the Air Ministry, the book is based on official records, and consequently forms a contribution to the authenticated literature on the war. THE REVOLUTIONARY IDEA IN FRANCE, 1789-1871. By GODFREY ELTON, Fellow op Queen's College, Oxford. One Volume. Demy 8vo. 10s. 6d. net. This book develops a theory of the essential character of the French Revolution and of the revolutionary outbreaks of 1830, 14 Edward Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. 1848 and 1871, which we believe has not been hitherto presented as a distinct thesis and made the subject of separate treatment. Mr. Elton points out that all historians of the Revolution have handled it as though the Revolution and the general history of France were interchangeable terms, and have thus in his opinion obscured its real character. He maintains on the other hand that it is possible to disengage the true essence of the Revolution from the general history of the time, and by so doing to make clear who were the actual authors of the Revolution, their motives and aims, and the permanent results which they in fact achieved. He applies his method with unshrinking thoroughness, e.g., passing by the conflict with the Church as irrelevant in tracing out the story of the Revolution, though of vast importance as a part of general history. His conclusions have a logic and a lucidity which give the book an absorbing interest. One of its most striking features is the distinction on which Mr. Elton insists between the revolu¬ tionary ideas of 1789, and the new economic or socialist revolution attempted in 1848 and again in 1871. This portion of the story brings us into touch with the most vital and urgent problems of modern politics. TRENTAREMI AND OTHER MOODS. By the Riqht Hon. Sir J. RENNELL RODD, G.C.B. Author of " The Violet Crown," " Ballads of the Fleet," etc. One Volume. Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. net. A new volume of Poems by Sir Rennell Rodd will be welcome to the many readers who admire his previous work in this sphere. Trentaremi is the name of a little rock-sheltered bay in the Gulf of Naples where the Author has a house, and its romantic surround¬ ings have doubtless lent inspiration to his Muse. IMPROMPTUS. By MARGARET, RANEE OF SARAWAK. One Volume. Crown 8vo. 6s. net. It is to the late W. H. Hudson that we owe the publication of these graceful and charming sketches from the pen of Margaret, Ranee of Sarawak. Only a few days before he died, he asked if she had done anything towards putting them into book form, and repeated the apt lines, which are quoted in the Foreword :— What are thoughts ? But birds that fly. What are words ? But traps to catch them by. Edward Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. 15 In the pages of this small book are collected thoughts on a wide variety of subjects, the connecting thread being an intense sympathy with nature in all its forms. The author sees life as a highway on which one encounters one's fellow-wayfarers, and cries them greeting : and by wayfarers are meant not only men and women, but the creatures who also claim our kinship. Who that reads this book will forget Isopel and her horse ; the dog Jack, the parrot who pleaded so persistently to be taken from the confines of a London shop to the freer life instinct told him this friend would give him ; or the lonely swan (perhaps the most charming of all the sketches). In all life this kinship throbs. When the Ranee weaves a romance around the carven figure of a woman long since dead ; when she watches the sap rising in the trees at spring¬ time, the same faith is hers—that life and love never pass away for ever. AN ATTRACTIVE NEW NOVEL. THE GATES ARE OPEN. By J. CRANSTON NEVILL. Author op "Ring Up the Curtain," etc. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. net. In this, his third novel, Mr. Nevill has given us a piece of work of great psychological interest. He writes with ease : he develops his subject skilfully : his characters are not mere abstractions, but real human beings who claim our sympathy. It is a book that will make a wide appeal, and especially to music-lovers, for Mr. Nevill writes of music with that sympathetic insight that belongs only to the true musician. Noel Lane possesses more than his share of the good things of life—youth, good looks, and a musical ability which just falls short of genius. His agent, Carl Blumenthal, and his friend, Lady Hermione Radleigh, are conscious of this lack, but to the former Noel's talent represents no more than a business asset of consider¬ able value, to be exploited by publicity methods, justifiable or not justifiable. Lady Hermione sees it as a gift which needs only the flame of some great emotional experience to transmute it into genius. Light-heartedly, Noel pursues the way of success, accepting all the happiness that comes to him so easily—his marriage, his child. But the heights are not yet reached. Only through travail can the real self be born. Not until tragedy has touched him—as Lady Hermione foresaw—can he find fulfilment. What exactly that tragedy is, it would be unfair to divulge ; suffice it to say that Mr. Nevill works up to his climax in a masterly manner, and that his story holds our attention to the end. 16 Edward Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. A FIRST NOVEL BY A NEW WRITER. SOFT GOODS. By OSWALD H. DAVIS. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. net. Mr. Davis, in this, his first novel, has achieved a remarkable piece of work, original in outlook, sincere and exact in presentation. He shows us life from a new view-pointr—from behind the counter —and shows it with almost uncanny vividness. Brian Leagold is the son of a provincial draper. Endowed with an appreciation of the beauty in life and with some literary ability, his ambition is to make a name for himself in the world of letters. But the prosaic needs of existence force him to earn money by more assured methods, and, as a means to an end, he enters his own shop. Here humiliation awaits him. Dismayed to find himself inferior to his own shop-assistants, he struggles for mastery over the multifarious intricacies of the trade—the nice distinction between one material and another, the hieroglyphic markings on a hosiery packet. And gradually he finds his self-imposed task is absorbing all his energies. An excursion into the literary world only disillusions him : journalism, he finds, is but another form of trade, " like cutting and selling bacon, only without the profits." He discovers the fascination of watching from behind his counter the ebb and flow of real life, and frankly he admits that trade has claimed him. Mr. Davis' story rivets the attention. The reader himself seems to move in Brian's world ; to watch with him the life of the pro¬ vincial city ; to see through his eyes the " commonness " of the women-kind with whom he is forced to mix : to feel with him their allurement, while candidly admitting their vulgarity. Mr. Davis set out to present the persistent everyday realities of life warring against the creations of the imagination, and brilliantly has he achieved his task. Unusual, vivid, well-written, interesting —such is his story. EDWIN BALMER'S LATEST NOVEL. KEEBAN. By EDWIN BALMER. Author of " The Breath of Scandal," etc. One Volume. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. net. All who enjoyed that fine novel " The Breath of Scandal " will turn expectantly to Mr. Balmer's new book " Keeban." And they Edward Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. 17 will not be disappointed. It is a thrilling tale of mystery, written with all the author's customary vigour. Who is Keeban ? That is what Steve Fanneal wanted to know : what Jerry Fanneal, as the person most concerned, set forth to find out. Was it a case of dual personahty or merely one of mistaken identity ? And it all happened because a small child in a Chicago park strayed from its mother ; strayed from the " underworld " of that city to a " marble mansion " on Astor Street. It would be unfair to unfold here the solution of the mystery. Suffice it to say that there is not a dull moment in Mr. Balmer's book. It has all the excitement and surprises of a cinema film, and may be best described as being " full of punches." To all who like a good story, well told, we recommend " Keeban " and can assure the reader that the book, once begun, will not be dropped until it is finished. ANOTHER INTERESTING FIRST NOVEL. GABRIEL QUELFORD. By ARTHUR HOUGHAM. One Volume. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. net. Mr. Hougham is a new writer whose work the discerning critic will watch with interest, for he gives promise of great things. This, his first book, has a simplicity, a freshness and a reality that lift it well above the average novel. His diction is clear and decisive : time after time he hits on an exact Tightness of expression, or on some fresh poetic simile that lingers in the memory : his characters are beings of flesh and blood—Gabriel, Gabriel's mother, Raven the agent, Cecily—to meet them in the pages of Mr. Hougham's book is to meet them in real life. Gabriel Quelford, when we first encounter him, is a farm lad, illiterate and uncouth. Stirred by longings for something he cannot even put a name to, he rebels at life's tyranny which has bound him to " the same thing, the same thing and the same thing again " : had he known the word " monotony " he would have used it. One day he sees a stranger striding over the hill: a " gentleman," who seems to possess all that he himself lacks— freedom, knowledge, outward seemliness. Ambition wakes in Gabriel: his formless desires take shape : one day he will be as that stranger. How bit by bit he attains his ideal, only to find disillusionment: how at the last comes love, love for a woman of the class he has alternately envied and despised, and with love, content, Mr. Hougham shows with masterly skill. 18 Edward Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. A CHARMING CORNISH PASTORAL. JACYNTH. By F. T. WAWN. Author of "This Masterdillo," "The Joyful Years," etc. One Volume. Grown 8vo. 7s. 6d. net. Readers of " The Masterdillo " will delight in welcoming another book from the pen of Mr. F. T. Wawn. His writing has a flavour all its own, and in " Jacynth " he proves himself to have lost none of that whimsicality and freshness that distinguished his earlier novels. Jacynth Humphreys is a notable creation : a character of rare charm and vitality : a heroine for whom the clean, open country makes a fit setting. The daughter of a Harley Street doctor, we find her, in the late years of the war, working as a land-girl in a little Cornish village. As a sharer of their toils, she is brought into close touch with the countryfolk, all of whom seem to have stepped straight from their village into the pages of Mr. Wawn's book. She attracts the notice of one Jasper Jones, a 1915 pensioner, with an unromantic name, a lame foot, a taste for the classics, and a love for all creatures great and small. The growth of love between these two, so far apart socially, so close in sympathies, is described with rare delicacy—the shy approach, the gradual yielding, the fulfilment. Mr. Wawn's characters always have just that touch of " differ¬ ence " which constitutes that intangible thing, charm. He writes of them with reality, but reality tempered with a fragrant senti¬ ment : for this reason " Jacynth " comes as a welcome relief from those numberless novels that insist only on life's ugly side. A FIRST NOVEL OF GREAT PROMISE. THE SILKEN SCARF. By L. C. HOBART. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. net. " Writers of readable fiction have enlisted a promising recruit in Miss L. C. Hobart. There are indications in the book of a real talent for description, and clear evidences of a skilful use of dia¬ logue."—Liverpool Post. " Miss L. C. Hobart has a good many qualities that should make for popular success. Above all, she can tell a story : an old- fashioned gift, but one that is very necessary. Her story moves. She stresses the emotional note, as she stresses the descriptive note here and there, but she does contrive to convey the emotion and the scene to her readers."—Birmingham Post. Edioard Arnold & Co.'8 Autumn Announcements. 19 THE BREATH OF SCANDAL. By EDWIN BALMER. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. net. " This novel ia a fine piece of work, very carefully written and most interesting to read. The scene of the scandal is a suburb of Chicago, and the protagonist is a prominent business man cursed with a wife who cares for nothing but a steady climb up the social ladder. And so there is another lady in the background. Un¬ fortunate, but not difficult to understand. But there is also a daughter. When her eyes are opened—well, that is Mr. Balmer's story, and very well he tells it."—The Bystander. RECENTLY PUBLISHED VOLUMES. THE LIFE OF JAMESON. By IAN COLVIN. Second Imp. Two Vols. 32s. net. " A work that springs clear from the ruck of conventional memoirs. This book is an adventure. Its galloping movement, the brilliancy of its word painting, the audacity of its similes, its fire and sarcasm, the supreme daring of its ' imaginary conversa¬ tions ' between the protagonists of the drama, combine to make it unique among modern biographies."—The Times. ALFRED YARROW: HIS LIFE AND WORK. By ELEANOR C. BARNES (LADY YARROW). many coloured and other illustrations. 10s. 6d. net. "We get a picture of a man who carved out his way by steady application, fair dealing, and innate engineering skill, to the estab¬ lishment of a great undertaking that has become famous all over the world."—The Times. " The book is a great and inspiring story. It is a triumph of good writing and excellent compilation."—Glasgow Herald. " One of those books that act upon one like a mental tonic. There is something wonderfully bracing about this vigorous, great-hearted personality."—Truth. THE STRANGER AND OTHER POEMS. By BRYCE McMASTER. Crown 8vo. 5s. net. " Mr. McMaster gives us charming lyrics expressing a delightful personality."—Morning Post. " His sense of the felicitous word, his real delight in natural beauty, and his discernment of poetic imagery in ordinary things give a distinction to each of these poems that is reminiscent of Aubrey de Vere at his best."—Freeman's Journal. 20 Edward Arnold & Co.'s Autumn Announcements. RECENTLY PUBLISHED. BEASTS, MEN AND GODS. By FERDINAND OSSENDOWSKI. Demy 8vo. Fourth Impression. 12s. 6d. net. " It would be difficult to imagine anything more thrilling than this mysterious and astounding book."—Spectator. "It is the most wonderful book of warlike adventure which has appeared for many a long year."—Morning Post. " The most extraordinary book of travel and adventure that this generation is likely to produce."—Outlook. LETTERS ON PRACTICAL BANKING. By JOHN BRUNTON, Author of " Bankers and Borrowers." 7s. 6d. net. " It is, in fact, a modern successor to Rae's ' Country Banker,' and, in our opinion, not an unworthy successor to this banking classic. Mr. Brunton treats his subject from the point of view of the shrewd man of business rather than of the law student, and it is for this reason that the book succeeds where nearly all text¬ books fail. He is particularly interesting in his treatment of balance sheets. Altogether the book is one to be heartily com¬ mended."—Journal of the Institute of Bankers. THE MORAL SELF: AN INTRODUCTION TO ETHICS