THE LETTERS AND JOURNALS OF ROBERT BAILLIE, A.M. PRINCIPAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW. M.DC.XXXVII.—M.DC.LXII. EDITED FROM THE AUTHOR'S MANUSCRIPTS, BY DAVID LAING, ESQ. IN THREE VOLUMES. VOLUME FIRST. EDINBURGH: PRINTED FOR ROBERT OGLE, 49 SOUTH BRIDGE. M.DCCC.XLI.EDINBURGH : ALEX. LAWRIE & CO. PRINTERS TO HER MAJESTY.At the Annual General Meeting of the Bannatyne Club, held at Edinburgh, in the Hall of the Antiquarian Society, on Monday the 3d day of December 1838 :— Resolved, That the Letters and Journals of Mr. Robert Baillie, Professor of Divinity, and Principal of the University of Glasgow, be printed for the usg of the Members, from the Original Manuscript preserved in the Archives of the Church of Scotland, under the superintendence of the Secretary of the Club ; and that an extra impression of the Work be thrown off, for General Sale, according to the Specimens exhibited to the Meeting. DAVID LAING, Secretary.PREFACE. THE Letters and Journals of Principal Baillie chiefly relate to public affairs, civil as well as ecclesiastical, and extend in a regular and nearly unbroken series from January 1637 to May 1662, or within a few weeks of his death. The value of this series in illustrating the history of that remarkable period has long been acknowledged, although the work is only now for the first time printed in an entire and genuine form, from the Author's Manuscripts. The very nature of such Letters, sometimes intended for the information of a wide circle, yet addressed to different individuals, on a variety of topics, and with no view to ultimate publication, precludes the work from being regarded as strictly historical ; yet these Letters not only serve to exhibit the succession of public events, but what is equally valuable, to convey the expression of the hopes, the fears, and the prevalent feelings of the time, in immediate connection with such occurrences. That Baillie has done so in a clear and interesting manner, will not be disputed. What else indeed has he handed down to us in his descriptions (to use an illustration of his own) but the stirring scenes of a great National Drama? His earlier letters allude to those measures of Charles the First that awakened an irrepressible spirit of religious zeal and independence, which ere long triumphed over every obstacle, and secured the re-establishment of Presbytery in Scotland. His letters then detail the origin, the changing fortunes, and the vol. i. bvi PREFACE. tragical incidents of the Great Civil War, which desolated these kingdoms; interspersed with accounts of the trial of the Earl of Strafford, the proceedings of General Assemblies of the Church, and of the Westminster Assembly of Divines; and they carry us on to the period when the dominant power of Cromwell and his sectarian forces, aided by the infatuated conduct of the English Monarch, prevented that Uniformity of Religion in Doctrine, Discipline, and Church-government, to the accomplishment of which both Nations were deeply pledged by the Solemn League and Covenant. This vision being at length dispelled, there was also an end put to the long cherished expectations of peace and concord when the death-warrant of Charles the First was signed, notwithstanding the public remonstrances and protestations of the Presbyterians both in Scotland and England. " One Act of our lamentable Tragedy" says Baillie, " being ended, we are entering again upon the scene:"—And now the affairs of the Church, in which he continued to sustain a somewhat conspicuous part, chiefly occupy his attention. It will be seen, that the attachment of the Presbyterians to a monarchical government, was the primary cause of those unhappy differences which sprang up and divided the Church of Scotland into the two parties, known as " Public Re-solutioners," and " Protesters," each of them actuated by the best motives, yet whose opposition proved not less ruinous to both, by eventually leading to the overthrow of the Presbyterian form of Church government in Scotland after the Restoration :—With what deplorable results to the interests of religion and the country at large, this last measure was attended, Baillie himself did not survive long enough to witness. Such are the leading topics in the following series of Letters. That the Author was a faithful as well as a diligent observer of public events, may be asserted ; and his personal share in many of the important transactions alluded to, and his habitual intercourse with the chief actors of the time, furnished him with the most favourable opportunities for obtaining correct information. ThatPREFACE. vii his Letters should so fully describe the prpgress of public affairs, arises partly from the circumstance of so many of them being addressed to his relation, Mr. William Spang, minister of the Scotish Church at Campvere, and afterwards at Middleburg, in Zealand, during the whole period of twenty-five years stated correspondence ; while the practice which Baillie fortunately adopted at an early period, of retaining copies of his Letters, has furnished after-times with a work which must always command attention both from the importance of the subject, his own integrity and honesty of purpose, so conspicuous in his familiar and most unreserved communications, and the lively and graphic manner in which transactions, whether of a public or private kind, are narrated. The original manuscript, containing the register of Baillie's Letters, is in three volumes quarto, very closely written^1) The persons he employed successively " to double" or transcribe his Letters, very often failed in deciphering his " evill hand;" but he himself usually corrected their mistakes, supplied the names or words omitted, and marked the dates and address. That nothing could be more wretched than his own orthography, the reader will be able to judge by inspecting the first letter in the series, (of which, as a specimen of his handwriting, an accurate facsimile is given,) and another printed in this volume at page 237. Even in regard to his own name, Baillie seems at no period of his life to have had a fixed mode of writing it. As his transcribers usually adopted their own orthography, whether copying from his papers, or from his dictation, of course it is very varied; and subsequent transcribers had no scruple in using a similar liberty: this will account for whatever variations may (l) The first seven leaves of Volume First appear never to have been copied, perhaps from being wholly in Baillie's own hand, which subsequent transcribers could not easily make out, and six of these leaves are now unfortunately lost. From a partial list of contents, on the last page of the volume, we may conjecture they were chiefly Letters in the year 1636.viii PREFACE. be discovered, as no attempt was made to adopt strict uniformity in this respect. The importance attached to Baillie's Letters and Journals as historical documents, appears from the care bestowed at an early date in transcribing them. A volume consisting chiefly of Letters addressed to Spang from 1637 to 1641, with the omission of private matters, but evidently taken from the first volume of the quarto MS., belonged to Dr. Fall, who was the second of Baillie's successors as Principal of the College of Glasgow. It is now preserved in the British Museum. (2) Of the first volume, the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland also possesses a folio manuscript written about the year 1700. A complete transcript of the work, in a very fair and legible hand, evidently for the use of the author's family, bears the date of 1701; (5) and from this copy the similar transcript in the University Library of Glasgow was probably made, and also Wodrow's, now the property of the Church of Scotland. The Church had previously obtained possession of the original volumes, which were purchased, with some other valuable manuscripts, by an order of the General Assembly, 20th May 1737, from the executors of Matthew Crawford, Professor of Ecclesiastical History in the University of Edinburgh. The (-) " Ane briefe Account of some memorable passages in the late Revolutions of Britaine:" MS. Harl. 6004, consisting of 212 pages, (erroneously numbered 215,) written on foolscap paper, in a neat hand of the seventeenth century. There is no note of the transcriber's name, nor whence the copy was made, but on the fly-leaf at the beginning is this note.,—" These papers were writ by Mn. Robert Bayley, Principal of the College of Glasgow, to Mr. Strang, Preacher to the Scottish Factory at Camphire in Zealand; given to me by my worthy and good friend Dr. James Fall, sometime Principal of Glasgow, now Precentor of York, December 31, 1709. W. Pearson." This memorandum is decidedly in a much more recent hand than the body of the MS. Dr. Fall was Principal of the College from 1684 to 1690. (3) In four volumes folio, the first volume being bound in two.—On the last page of the second volume is written,—" Finem posui hujus libri, llmo die Septembris 1701."PREFACE. ix transcript mentioned as dated 1701, remained however with the Author's descendants, till within a comparatively recent period, when, along with some manuscript volumes of Sermons and Treatises, written by Baillie, it came into the possession of Dr. M'Crie, the late eminent biographer and divine. From one or other of these MSS. the work was frequently used in the course of the last century; and more especially by Stevenson, who originally contemplated to publish it entire, previous to the compilation of his own History of the Church, (4) a great portion of which is a literal transcript from it, yet not without ample acknowledgment. In noticing the vouchers for his History, he says, " But the great repository from whence I am chiefly furnished is, The Historical Letters and Collections of Mr. Robert Baillie, consisting of four volumes folio," &c. In fact, these Letters, to a greater or less extent, have been used by all succeeding writers respecting that period of our history, although they generally contented themselves with referring to the printed edition which appeared at Edinburgh in the year 1775, in two vols. 8vo. The name of the Editor is no where mentioned; nor can much reliance be placed on what used commonly to be stated in Edinburgh booksellers catalogues, in the early part of this century, and has been repeated by Mr. Orme,(5) that it was undertaken at the recommendation of Dr. Robertson and David Hume. On the title-page of some of the copies, the Letters are said to have been " carefully transcribed by Robert Aiken ;" but who this person was does not appear, except that we may conclude he was the same individual who is named in proposals (4) " The History of the Church and State of Scotland, from the accession of K. Charles I. to the Restoration of K. Charles II. In Four Volumes. Collected from the Publick Records, Mr. Baillie's Letters, and other Writings of that time. By Andrew Stevenson, Writer in Edinburgh." Edinburgh, 1753-1757, 3 vols, small octavo. The work is only brought down to the beginning of the year 1649, as volume fourth was never completed. (5) Orme's Bibliotheca Biblica, p. 17- Edinburgh, 1824, 8vo.x PREFACE. for printing the work, dated March 17 th 1775, which bear, that " Subscriptions are taken in by William Gray, front of the Exchange, Edinburgh ; by Robert Aitken, schoolmaster at Ander-ston ; and by all others entrusted with proposals." Had either of the learned historians above named taken a special interest in the work, it is very improbable that the services of an obscure individual in the West Country would have been required. But that Edition has no claim to be regarded otherwise than as a Selection from Baillie's Letters. The advertisement prefixed to it states, that " It was thought proper to leave out some things that relate to the Author's family and other private matters ; but nothing has been left out that throws the smallest light upon the history of those times." This is scarcely correct: many of the passages omitted may not be strictly historical, yet they throw great light on the spirit and temper of the times. But there are numerous Letters entirely omitted, such as his correspondence with Sharp previous to the Restoration, and others on subjects of Literature, besides all those local and personal details which, however unimportant in themselves, enhance the interest, as they add to the genuine character, of such documents. A complete and accurate publication of Baillie's Letters was therefore a work that had long been desired by persons who felt any interest in such matters. The present Edition of the Work was undertaken for the Members of The Bannatyne Club ; a literary Association in Edinburgh, instituted several years ago, for the purpose of preserving, in an accessible form, the more valuable remains of our National History and Literature existing in manuscript, or in printed works of great rarity. In regard however to the acknowledged importance of this work, and as the Rules of the Club do not restrict the circulation of works so printed among the Members, when of a kind likely to interest the Public, it was resolved, although the chief expense of collating and transcribing would fall upon thePREFACE. xi Club,(6) that some arrangement should be made for having an extra impression thrown off for general sale, and for securing its publication at a moderate charge. The usual quarto size of the Club publications being less suited for that purpose, as necessarily adding to the expense, the lines of the pages have been overrun, to alter the form into royal 8vo., so that both Editions might usually correspond page for page, as well as in other respects. This plan, however, has proved the means of greatly retarding the completion of the work. As to the mode of editing, I may add, that the text has partly been given from the Manuscript belonging to the Society of Antiquaries, but chiefly from that of 1701, (which was most obligingly granted for that purpose by the Reverend Thomas M'Crie,) and then very carefully revised and corrected by the Author's original copy ; the use of this latter MS. having been obtained three years ago for The Bannatyne Club, by the special permission of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland. The Author, in the course of his correspondence with his cousin William Spang, frequently transmitted him copies of public papers, and other documents relating to the affairs of the time. Many of these he also caused to be transcribed along with his own Letters. To have inserted the whole of such extraneous matter would greatly have increased the size of the work without materially adding to its value. On the other hand, either to have incorporated some of them in the text, or entirely to have omitted them, might have been equally liable to objection. The plan that has been followed, was not adopted without due deliberation. In the Appendix to each Volume is given, first, a complete List of the various Papers (G) For this purpose the services of my worthy friend Mr. David Meek were secured; but besides the necessary collation and transcription, numberless minute investigations were required, (which my own time did not permit of making,) for ascertaining the dates of letters, &c.: and to his great fidelity and familiar acquaintance with the ecclesiastical transactions of the period, it is but justice to add, that the work is greatly indebted.xii PREFACE. interspersed with his Letters, and references to works in which a very considerable portion of them have already been published ; and next, a Selection of such contemporary Papers as seemed most worthy of notice. This includes from Baillie's M.S. such as either related to his own personal affairs, or to the University with which he was so lorig connected; but instead of swelling the work by republishing papers merely from the circumstance of their having been collected by Baillie, this Selection generally consists of Original Letters and other documents hitherto unpublished. These have been collected from a variety of sources, and chiefly refer to the state of Ecclesiastical Affairs in Scotland during the period which each volume embraces. This Selection however is much less numerous than I could have wished, owing to the limited space. The articles in the Appendix to the present volume being mostly written by the opponents of Baillie and the Presbyterian party, that such additions may not be thought incongruous to a work like the present, I may observe, that nothing seemed so well calculated to illustrate and confirm the Author's statements, or so clearly to point out the objects which the Scotish Prelates and their adherents had in view, when the troubles commenced, than the publication of such of their Letters and Papers, between 1633 and 1639, as could be recovered. Signet Library, Edinburgh, .June 1841.TABLE OF CONTENTS. LETTERS AND JOURNALS OF ME, ROBERT BAILLIE. 1637. Page Letter to Mr. William Wilkie, 2d January, . . 1 -—— to Mr. William Spang, 29th January, . 2 -—to the Archbiftiop of Glafgow, 14th Auguft, 12 -— to one of the Minifters of Glafgow, (without date,) 13 -to Mr. William Spang, 4th 06tober, . . 15 Note of Proceedings, fince the 5th of December, ... 25 1638. Letter to Mr. Robert Wilkie, 16th January, . . 27 —:— to Mr. Alexander Cunningham, (fame date,) . 27 -— to the Principal, Dr. John Strang, (fame date,) 29 --to Mr. John Maxwell, (fame date,) . . 30 -to Mr. William Spang, 27th February, . 31 Narrative of Proceedings, from 21ft December to 24th February, . . . 54 Letter to Mr. William Spang, 5th April, . . 62 -—— to Principal Strang, (without date,) . . 66 —--to Mr. William Spang, (without date,) . 69 News from England, 15th July, . . 72 Letter to Mr. William Spang, 15th July, . •' 73 -—r— to a neighbouring Clergyman, (without date,) . 95 -— to Mr. William Spang, 1ft November, . 96 vol. i. cxiv TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1639. Page Letter to Mr. William Spang, 12th February, . 113 -to the fame, containing an Account of the Proceedings of the General Affembly at Glafgow, in November 1638, written in June 1639, . 118 --to Mr. Archibald Johnftone of Warrifton, (20th December 1638.) . . 177 -to Mr. David Dickfon, 21ft January, . 179 -to the Earl of Loudoun, 21ft January, . 181 —— to Mr. William Spang, 28th September, . 184 -to the fame, Poftfcript, 12th O&ober, . 223 Inftru6tions to Mr. Alexander Cunningham, (without date.) 225 Letter to Henry Glen, Glafgow, in November, . 228 -from the Provoft, Magiftrates, &c. of Glafgow, 23d November, .... 229 --in Anfwer to the above, 27th November, . 230 —-from William Yair, Glafgow, 26th November, 231 -in Anfwer to the above, (without date,) . 232 -from the Provoft, Magiftrates, &c. of Glafgow, 7th December, . . . 233 -— in Anfwer to the above, 11th December, . 234 --to the Earl of Eglinton's factor ? (without date,) 235 --to Mr. Archibald Johnftone of Warrifton, 16th December, .... 237 1640. Letter to Mr. Archibald Johnftone, 30th March, . 242 --to Mr. David Dickfon, 30th March, . 243 His Teftament, when he went to the Army, 4th May, 245 Letter to Mr. William Spang, after the General Affembly at Aberdeen, in September, . . 247 --to Lord Montgomery, in September, . 263 -from the Earl of Rothes, Montrofe, &c. 15th 06tober, 266 -from the Earl of Argyle, 17th Odtober, . 266 Another Teftament, 22d O&ober, . . 267 Letter to Mrs. Baillie, at Kilwinning, 5th November, 268 -to the fame, 6th November, . . 270 -to the fame, 18th November, . . 271 —,— to the Prefbytery of Irvine, 2d December, . 274TABLE OF CONTENTS. xv Page Letter to Mrs. Baillie, 4th December, . . 278 -to the fame, 12th December, . . 278 -to the Prefbytery of Irvine, 12th December, 279 -to the fame, 28th December, . . 283 1641. Letter to the Prefbytery of Irvine, 29th January, . 288 -to Mrs. Baillie, 6th February, . . 296 -to the fame, 22d February, . . 299 -to the Prefbytery of Irvine, 28th February, 300 -to the fame, 15th and 19th March, . . 304 •-to the fame, containing a Journal of the Earl of Strafford's Trial, 7th May, . . 313 -to Mrs. Baillie, 2d June, . . . 353 -to Lord Montgomery, 2d June, . . 354 --to Mr. William Spang, 15th July, . . 355 -to the fame, 20th Auguft, . . 358 An Account of the Proceedings of the Parliament of Scotland, 25th Auguft, . . . 377 Letter to Mr. William Spang, (without date,) . 388 Memorandum for the Town and College of Glafgow, (without date,) . . .398 APPENDIX. No. I.—List of Papers inserted in Volume First of the Manuscript Collection of Baillie's Letters and Journals, from 1637 to 1641. . 403 "No. II.—Original Letters and Papers, chiefly relating to Ecclesiastical Affairs in Scotland, 1633 to 1639- 1633. 1. Letter of Charles the Firft, to Bellenden, Bifhop of Dunblane, 8th O&ober, . . 421 2. The Articles fprhis Majefty's Chapel-Royal, (fame date,) 422xyi TABLE OF CONTENTS. 1634. Page 3. Letter from Charles the Firft to the Lords of Council and Seffion, 13th May, . . 423 4. Warrant of Charles the Firft for eftablifhing the Court of High Commiffion in Scotland, 21ft 06tober, 424 5. Account of Papers intercepted betwixt Archbifhop Laud and the Scotifti Bifhops, (without date,) 428 6. Letter from Archbifhop Laud to Bellenden, Biftiop of Dunblane, 14th January, . . 431 7. -from the fame to the fame, 6th May, . 432 8. -from the fame to the fame, 1ft July, . 433 9. -from the fame to the fame, 4th 06lober, . 434 1635. 10. Letter from the fame to the fame, 12th January, . 435 11 .--from the fame to the fame, 19th May, . 436 12. -from the fame to Maxwell Bifhop of Rofs, 19th September, . . . 436 1636. 13. Letter from Dr. Juxon, Bifhop of London, to the fame, 17th February, . . .438 14. - from the Earl of Stirling to the fame, 17 th February, .... 439 15. Account of the Privy Council of Scotland, authoriling the Service-Book, with his Majefty's Warrant, in O6tober, . 440 1637. 16. Difcharge, by the Printer, &c. for Books furnilhed to the Chapel-Royal, in April, • • . 441 17. Letter from Archbifhop Spotifwood to Dr. Hall, Bifhop of Norwich, . . • 442 18 .--from Lindesay, Bifhop of Edinburgh, to the Prefbytery of Dalkeith, 28th April, . 442 19. Inftru6tions how the Service came to be made : deliver- ed to Dr. Balcanquall by the King, • . 443 20. Information from the Earl of Stirling to Dr. Balcan- quall, ..... 446TABLE OF CONTENTS, Page 21. Extra6ts from the Regifters of the Privy Council of Scotland, 13th June,—25th Auguft, 1637, . 447 22. The Supplication of certain Minifters of Fife, prefent- ed to the Privy Council, 23d Auguft, • 449 23. Information given to Councillors, . . 450 24. Letters to and from the Lords of Privy Council of Scotland : 1. The Council's Letter to the King, 25th Auguft, 451 2. The King's Letter to the Council, 10th Sep- tember, . . . . 452 3. The Council's Letter to the King, 20th Sep- tember, .... 453 4. The fame to the Earl of Stirling, 14th De- cember, . . . . 454 25. The Earl of Loudoun's Speech to the Lords of Privy Council, 21ft December, . . . 455 26. Extracts from the Regifter of Privy Council, 1ft and 5th March, . . . ,.. • . 458 27. Letter from Mr. David Mitchell to Dr. John Lefley, Bifhop of Raphoe, 19th March, . . 463 1638. 28. Letter from the Earl of Loudoun to Johnftone of Warrifton, 24th April, . . . 464 29. - from Archbifhop Spotifwood to the Marquis of Hamilton, (without date,) . . . 466 30. Dr. Balcanquall's Propofitions to the King, at Oat- lands, (without date,) . . . 467 31. Some Directions fent to Prefbyteries, 27th Auguft, 469 32. Note of the Private Articles, 27th Auguft, . 469 33. Letter of Inftru&ions fent to Prefbyteries, 28th Auguft, 470 34. Baillie's Commiflion to the General Affembly, 25th September, . . ... 473 35. Letter from Sir Thomas Hope, Lord Advocate, to the Earl of Rothes, 2d Oftober, . . 474 36. - from Lindefay, Bifhop of Edinburgh, to the Prefbytery, 9th 06tober, ... 475 37 .--from Dr. Balcanquall to Laud, Archbifhop of Canterbury, (without date,) . . 475xviii TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page 38. The Earl of Loudoun's Reafons to diffuade the King from fwearing Protection to the Bifhops at his Coronation, in June 1633, . . 477 39. Letter from the Earl of Rothes to the Earl of Balcarras, 11th November 1637. . . 477 40. - in favour of Dr. Balcanquall, in November 1638, and another from the King, . . 478 41. Letters to Dr. Balcanquall, in 1638 and 1639 : . 479 1. Prom Mr. William Wilkie, 29th Oftober 1638, 481 2. Prom the fame, 6th November, . 482 3. Prom the fame, 11th December, . 483 4. From the fame, 26th December, . 484 5. From the fame, 11th March 1639, . 487 6. From Dr. Strang, Principal of the College of Glafgow, (without date,) . 490 7. From Mr. William Wilkie, (without date,) 490 42. Commiffion from the General Affembly for vifiting the Univerfity of Aberdeen, . . 491MEMOIR OF THE LIFE AND WRITINGS OF ROBERT BAILLIE. VOL. I. aMEMOIR of the LIFE AND WRITINGS OF ROBERT BAILLIE. Robert Baillie, the author of these Letters and Journals, was a native of Glasgow, and was born in the Saltmarket on Friday the 30th of April 1602.1 His father, Thomas Baillie, was probably a merchant or tradesman in Glasgow, being described as a citizen of that place,2 and was a younger son of Robert Baillie of Jerviston near Hamilton. He was thus connected with many families of distinction in the West of Scotland; as the Baillies of Jerviston were cadets of the Carphin family, and consequently a branch of the ancient family of Hoprig and Lamington,3 all in the county of Lanark. Elizabeth, one of the daughters of Robert Baillie of Jerviston, was married 1 The date hitherto assigned for his birth is the year 1599. That he was not born till 1602, as above stated, we learn from the following minute memorandum of the exact day and hour of his birth, written on the fly-leaf of a note-book while he was a student at the College; viz. Robertus Baillize natus pridie Kal. Maij hora sesquiquarta a meridie 1602 die Veneris. This date is further confirmed by his own authority at a later period of his life. In a letter to Sharp written in August 1661, he urges his inability " in this my sixtieth yeare, and frequent infirmities,'' as one reason for declining a journey to London, in case he had been fixed upon to go thither on the affairs of the Church. (Vol. iii. p. 474.) The Saltmarket, a well-known street in Glasgow, which had the honour to be the birth-place of two Principals of the University, (lb. p. 402), has, in our own days, obtained still greater celebrity from a fictitious character introduced in a work known to every one. 2 In the brief notice of Baillie's Life, prefixed to the publication of his Letters in 1775. 3 The Baillies of Hoprig and Lamington, (from whom the families of Carphin, Carnbrue, Jerviston, and others were, all branches), have been usually considered to have been originally connected with the illustrious house of the Balliols, who were Lords of Galloway ; and in the account of the Lamington family, given in Nisbet's Heraldry, (Vol. ii. App. p. 128), Sir William Baillie of Hoprig is said to have obtained the estate of Lamington, by his marriage with the eldest daughter and heiress of Sir William Wallace. But Sir George Mackenzie in his MS. Genealogies, controverts the opinion that the name of Balliol was changed to Baillie, and shews that the armorial bearings of the two families were different, and that the name of the latter was known in Scotland as early at least as 1292, when (he says) Sir John Baillie swore fealty to Edward the Third at Berwick. See also note in Chalmers's Caledonia (Vol. iii. p. 742) respecting the alleged alliance of Baillie of Hoprig and a descendant of Wallace.*xii MEMOIR OF THE LIFE 1 to Archibald Roberton, a younger son of the family of Earnock,1 and their son, James Roberton of Bedlay, who held for some years the office of a Regent in the University of Glasgow, afterwards became an advocate, and, when far advanced in life, was raised to the Bench. His mother, Helen Gibson, was a daughter of Henry Gibson and of Annabella Forsyth.2 Another daughter was mairied to Archibald Fleming of Ferme, afterwards Commissary of Glasgow; and in this way might Baillie's relationship be traced to some of the numerous persons, the Spangs, Forsyths, Flemings, Raes, Crichtons, and others, whom he has addressed as cousins.3 This Henry Gibson, whose name appears in 1580, as Town-Clerk of Glasgow, and in 1592, as Commissary of the Diocese of Glasgow, is supposed to have been either the uncle or brother of George Gibson of Goldingstone, the founder of the Durie family, one of whom, Sir Alexander Gibson of Durie, became a judge in the Supreme Civil Court, and his son, of the same name, was Lord Clerk Register, in the reign of Charles the First, and was also raised to the Bench. Of Robert Baillie's early education, we learn from his own words that his first instructions were received under the parental roof; and that he was afterwards placed at the public school in Glasgow, of which Robert Blair, an eminent divine, was then assistant master. In 1646, when he dedicated to Blair his " Historicall Vindication of the Government of the Church of Scotland," he thus recalls the memory of his youthful days : " When I look back (as frequently I doe with a delightful remembrance) towards those years of my childhood and youth, wherein I did sit under your discipline, my heart blesses the goodnesse of God, who in a very rich mercy to me, did put almost the white and razed table of my spirit under your hand, after my domestick instructions which were from mine infancy, to be engraven by your labours and example with my first most sensible and remaining impressions, whether of piety, or of good letters, or of morall vertue : What little portion in any of these, it hath pleased 1 In George Crawfurd's MS. Baronage, p. 380 (MS. Advocates Library,) she is called " Elspeth Baillie, daughter to' the goodman of Jerviestone near Hamilton.'' An account of the Robertons of Earnock is contained in Nisbet's Heraldry, vol. ii. App. p. 145. 2 «« Henry Gibson left a daughter by his wife Anabella Forsyth, daughter to Mr. David [Forsyth] of Blackhill," (Crawfurd's MS. Baronage, p. 348.) " Henry Gibson, Town Clerk of Glasgow in 1580, who, they say, was Durrie's brother, and had a daughter married to Archibald Fleming of Ferm, &c." (Ib. p. 198.) 3 In vol. i. p. 76, Baillie speaks of Lord Alexander, eldest son of William first Earl of Stirling, as being "his near Cousin."OF ROBERT BAILLIE. xxiii the Lord of his high and undeserved favour to bestow upon me; I were ungratefull if I should not acknowledge you after my Parents, the first and principall instrument thereof. I cannot deny, that since the eleventh year of mine age to this day, in my inmost sense, I have alwayes found my selfe more in your debt, than in any other man's upon earth.1' The mention of the period of Baillie's life would fix the time to the year 1613; but according to Blair's own statement, after he had completed his .course of Philosophy at the College at Glasgow, " under the discipline of my brother, Mr. William Blair, I was engaged (he says) to be an assistant to the aged and decayed schoolmaster of Glasgow, who had under his discipline above 300 children, the one-half whereof was committed to my charge." This must have been in 1614, as he took his degree in that year; and he further mentions, that after two years employment in teaching, he was admitted to be a Regent in the College. His admission to that office took place in March 1616; and as Baillie entered the College of Glasgow in March 1617, he would again come under the tuition of Blair, who continued to fill the office of Regent till the year 1623, when he resigned his charge; and soon after he received an invitation to become minister of a presby-terian congregation at Bangor, in Ireland. In 1620, Baillie having completed the usual course of philosophical study, extending over four sessions, took the degree of Master of Arts, probably with some distinction, as his name stands first on the list of graduates on that occasion. As the custom then prevailed, and is so apparent in all the letters and papers of that time, of prefixing Mr. to the names of the persons mentioned, or themselves using it when signing their names, it may be noticed, that this was done by way of distinction, and that it uniformly denotes such persons to have taken the degree of A. M. Of this interval he availed himself to gratify his thirst for knowledge by an excursion to some of the principal towns in Scotland. From some very brief notes of his journey, we learn, that after visiting some of his relations in Bothwell, Hamilton, and Cadder, he and one or two companions proceeded to Kilsyth, Stirling, and the Links of Forth; thereafter to Perth, Scone, Dundee, " where we saw the Bishop of Brechin, and Dr. Bruce." Having crossed the ferry, they came to St. Andrews, and visited " the kirk, castle, port, three colledges, abbey ;" and there conversed with some of the Professors, and, at Darsie, with the Archbishop ofxxiv MEMOIR OF THE LIFE St. Andrews. In Cupar, they dined with Mr. William Scot; thence to Falkland, Dysart and Kirkaldy, and drank of the famous mineral spring at Kinghorn. " The shore and links, with the bulwark of Leith being seen ; we see the tolbooth [of Edinburgh], kirks, castle, printers, booksellers, colleges, abbay." They also visited Roslin and other places in the vicinity of the metropolis, before returning to their native place.1 As it was Baillie's intention to devote himself to the ministry, he continued his attendance at College, with the view of completing his theological studies. From an incidental notice in 1621, we learn, that if it had been in his power, he would have spent some time at one of the foreign universities. " We live (he says,) upon conceits. Seeing I have no means to go abroad, the less God will require of me : wherefore I expect no more but to satisfy a little curiosity; yet I hope in two years to see Ley-den and England, part of France, if peaceable, then to live and die in any landward church that is offered.'1''2 At this time Robert Boyd of Trochrig, a man of very singular learning and accomplishments, was Principal of the University of Glasgow. To his posthumous commentary on the Epistle to the Ephesians, published in 1652, a short account of his life was prefixed by Baillie, in which mention is made of the flourishing state of the University under his superintendance; and he exclaims, what a brave time it was, when the College enjoyed such a Principal, and Regents so eminent and highly esteemed as William Blair, David Dickson, James Roberton (of Bedlay), James Sharp (of Govan), and Robert Blair. He likewise mentions his having in his youth heard the latter portion of the commentary delivered by Boyd in the course of his public lectures, to a large circle of studious or learned men; and how eagerly he listened to these prelections, with not less advantage than pleasure; and even then, he adds, after an interval of thirty years, by calling such times to remembrance it filled his mind with the most pleasing recollections.3 Boyd however resigned his 1 MS. Note Book, p. 126__The passage in the MS. is somewhat obscure, and not worth quoting. 2 MS. Note Book, p. 292__The orthography of the original is not retained, being scarcely intelligible. The following is a literal copy of the passage :—" We leiv on conceits, seing I heiv no means to go abroad, the lesse God wil requir of me, querfor I rek no mor bot to stench a litil curiositie, yit I hop in 2 ears to sie Leidan and Inglan, a peic of Franc, if peacibil, then to die and liv in oni landvart kirk that is offerit." 3 " Et qufE'lam de ultima hujusce Operis parte, quam olim pueri non minori cum voluptate quam fructu, in frequenti doetorum virorum et studiosorum corona, soiebamus tanta aviditate auscultare, ut eorum temporum rceordalio non mediocri etiamnum suavitate animum perfundat." (Ad Lec-torem Epistola.)OF ROBERT BAILLIE. XXV office as Principal before his affectionate pupil had been long under his immediate charge, or could have derived much benefit from his instructions. In one of Baillie's early note-books, he assigns various reasons for Boyd's resignation ;l but it was mainly occasioned by his firm adherence to the cause of Presbytery, and consequently his disinclination to promote those measures of conformity to the Articles passed by an Assembly held at Perth in 1618, and confirmed by Parliament in 1621, which enjoined certain ceremonial observances in public worship, but which were then esteemed to be only preparatory to the full establishment of diocesan Episcopacy in this country. Boyd having fixed his residence in Edinburgh, was, on the 18th of October 1622, elected Principal of that University and one of the Ministers of the City. King James was so much displeased with his appointment, notwithstanding Boyd's acknowledged " gifts and peaceable disposition," that he peremptorily commanded the Magistrates and Council of Edinburgh to remove him, " not only from his office, but out of your town, at the sight hereof, unless he conform totally : And, when ye have done, think not this sufficient to satisfy our wrath for disobedience to our former letter."2 In Glasgow, the office of Principal having remained for one year vacant, a successor to Boyd was found in the person of John Cameron, a divine of equal learning and attainments, who was a native of Glasgow, where he had been educated, and for a short time was one of the Regents. Much of his life had been spent abroad, and he had filled a chair in several foreign Universities, having latterly been Professor of Divinity at Saumur, the chief protestant seminary in France; but in 1620 being driven from that country by the civil troubles, Cameron sought in England a place of refuge for himself and his family; 1 Boyd was elected Principal of the College of Glasgow, 20th January 1615, and, in virtue of his office, was Minister of Govan, on the banks of the Clyde, about two miles west from Glasgow. Baillie's words are,—" The Principal is resolvit to retir himself at Lambes : 1. Becaus he is not abil for waknes of bodie, not for capacitie, to preich in Govan 1, & 2 in the Colleg. 2. Becaus he cannot liv a paedantrie lyf angrieng himself with bairns. 3. Becaus he is resolvit not to obey. 4. That he mey sie for his Wyf (a stranger) and babies, for his huse [house] is de-caing, and his Brothir is far fra hevin[g] mikil sauing of his aun [own]. 5. That he mey polisch sum things he hes in hand, to gif them to the press. To quhilk the Bischop answerit, with mani protestatiuns of his respect to him. But he desyrit no mor favur then to depart peacable. He is offend[it] with the Bischop of Argil, and M. Jhams, and othirs, that laburs to dimov him." (Baillie's MS. Note Book, 1621, p. 69.) 2 Boyd gave in his resignation to the Town-Council on the 31st of January 1623. He retired to his estate in Carrick; and died on the oth of January 1627. See The Bannatyne Miscellany, vol. 1, pp. 285, 296, 297.xxvi MEMOIR OF THE LIFE and he resided some time in London, where he read private lectures in divinity. The high opinion which King James entertained of his learning and moderation, led to his appointment at Glasgow. He was admitted the 3d of January 1623, but not finding the situation agreeable, before a full year had elapsed, he relinquished that charge and returned to France.1 During even the brief period of his incumbency, he appears to have had no small influence in confirming his students in the doctrine of passive obedience; for when, by the course of public events, Baillie's attention had been more immediately drawn to the subject of submission to the civil power, he acknowledges that he " had drunken in, without examination, from my Master Cameron, in my youth, that slavish tenet, that all resistance to the Supreame Magistrate in anie case was simplie unlawfull.11 In like manner, in 1646, in his address to Robert Blair, already referred to, he says, " I confesse, that after you, to my exceeding great grief and losse, were taken away from my head, and 1 came to be set at the feet of other masters, especially Mr. Cameron and Mr. Struthers, my very singular friends and excellent divines as our Nation has bred, I was gained by them to some parts of conformity, which, if the Lord's mercy had not prevented, might have led me, as many my betters, to have run on in all the errours and defections of these bad times: but thanks to his glorious name, who held me by the hand, and stopped me at the beginning and first entry of that unlucky course; who before I had put my hand to any subscription, or was engaged in any promise, or had practised any the least Ceremony in my flock, did call me to a retreat.11 It was not till two years after Cameron's resignation that Dr. John Strang minister of Errol, was raised to the office of Principal ;2 and although suspected of being in favour of conformity, he displayed great prudence and zeal in the affairs of the College, and succeeded during a period of twenty-four years to sustain the reputation and usefulness of that seminary of learning. The distinction which probably attended Baillie during the whole course of his academical studies, may have led to his appointment as one of the Regents in the College. He was admitted to this office on the 16th of August 1625 ; and on that occasion he delivered an inaugural oration, 1 See Life of Cameron, in Dr. Irving's Lives of Scotish Writers, vol. i. p. 339. Edinb. 1839, 2 vol. 8vo. 2 The date of Strang's admission as Principal, was the 22d of February 162(>.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. xxvii De Mente Agente} The Oath he subscribed on his admission is given below.8 Three years later he delivered another oration, In laudern Linguce Hebraicce ;3 towards the close of which he speaks in high terms of their late Principal, Cameron, and the ardour he excited among the students in cultivating a knowledge of the Hebrew, Chaldee, and other languages ; and Baillie himself may at this time have imbibed that love of Oriental literature for which he was distinguished. Among the persons who were scholars, during the years he held the office of Regent, there were many young men of rank, including members of the noble families of Hamilton, Eglintoun, Grlencairne, Lindesay, Stirling, and Wigton. It is probable, the education of some of these young men may have been specially entrusted to Baillie, while they were attending the classes in the University. Archibald Johnston of Warriston appears likewise to have been under his charge; and it will be observed that he frequently calls himself his master. One of his pupils, who had the greatest influence on his subsequent fortunes, was Hugh Lord Montgomery, eldest son of the Earl of Eglintoun ; and a vacancy happening in the parish church of Kilwinning, Ayrshire, the presentation to it was given to Baillie, as a reward for his services. The date of Baillie's appointment to this benefice must have been before Autumn 1631; as James Forsyth was admitted on the 1st of September that year, as a Regent in the College, evidently to supply the vacancy occasioned by his resignation. The older records of the parish of Kilwinning are not preserved, from which the precise time of his induction could be ascertained, but it was either at the close of the year 1631, or the beginning of 1632. For he 1 The date 1627 is however given in the MS., in the title: " Oratio in Academia Glasguensis comitiis habita a R. B. anno 1627, cum in Regentium numerum solemniter cooptaretur, De Mente Agente." 2 The following is transcribed from the Register of the College, (vol. vii. p. 62.)—" XVII. Cal. Septem. Anno Sal. 1626—Quo die in numerum Magistiorum Academiae Glasguensis legitime cooptatus est M. Ro. Ball^eus, qui hoc admissionis suae Sacramentum preestitit: Ego Mag. Robejitus Ball.sus cooptatus in numerum Magistrorum Academiae Glasguensis, promitto sancteque juro me, favente Dei gratia, muneris mihi demandati partes (studiose) fideliterque obiturum; et in hujus Academise rebus ac rationibus gerendis ac procurandis, et commodis ador-namentis augendis, nihil reliqui ad summam fidem et diligentiam facturum ; rec ante sexennium exactum nisi impetrata vonia ab iis quorum interest stationem hanc deserturum, nec nisi consultis, et ante tres menses praemonitis Academiuj Moderatoribus, discessum. Quod si diutius hoc munere, fungi contigerit, ne turn quidem ante exactum anni curriculum, et trium mensium praemonitionem. alio migraturum.—R. BAILIE." 3 " Oratio in Laudem Linguae Hebraese, in Academiae Comitiis dum promoverenter Orclines, Anno CIoIoCXXIX Recitata." VOL. I. exxviii MEMOIR OF THE LIFE says, " My verie good Lord, my Lord Montgomerie, in whose education, from a child, I have had some hand, out of a tender affection towards me, when I had been some years his master in the schools, brought me thence with him to be his own preacher, at his parish kirk, for term of life, shewing me alwayes so much courtesie in every thing as my heart could wishand in a paper written in August 1639, he refers this to some seven or eight years ago,1 when, he adds, Mr. David Dickson " made, as it were, a solemne marriage" betwixt him and his parishioners. Previously to this event, he had received orders from James Law, Archbishop of Glasgow, (who died in November 1632); but the date 1622 usually assigned, is undoubtedly erroneous, as Baillie had not then completed his theological studies. His immediate predecessor in that charge, we presume, was John G-lassford, whose name occurs in the records of the Regality of Kilwinning, as Minister in 1619, and who is joined along with Baillie, James Fergusson, and Ralph Rogers, as the " eminent, learned, and pious men," with whom the congregation of Kilwinning had been blest since the Reformation.2 The Abbey of Kilwinning, in the district of Cunningham, Ayrshire, one of the most ancient and important institutions of the kind in this country, was founded in the reign of David the First, (a. d. 1140) ; but this stately and imposing fabrick was in a great measure destroyed at the Reformation. In the year 1603, Hugh Earl of Eglintoun having obtained a new grant of the Abbey, with all the lands and titles belonging to it, they were erected into a temporal lordship for him and his successors. A part of the old Abbey Church had previously been repaired, and converted into a parish church ; and it continued to be so used till the year 1775, when, on account of its ruinous state, it was entirely demolished. About the time of his parochial settlement, Baillie formed an alliance of another kind, having been united in marriage with Lilias Fleming, of the family of Cardarroch, in the parish of Cadder, near Glasgow. In the latter part of the year 1633, a vacancy in one of the churches of Edinburgh was occasioned by the decease of William Struther,3 a mini- 1 See the Supplication, and Baillie's Reasons against his Translation, in No. XLVII of Appendix vol. ii, p. 443. 2 Preface to Fergusson's Sermons on the Errors of Toleration, 8cc. Edinburgh, 1692, 8vo. 3 Baillie, vol. iii. p. 402. Struther, as there intimated, was a native of Glasgow, and was admitted minister of the Inner High Church in that city in 1611. About tho year 1616, he was translated to Edinburgh, where he was very highly respected. His successor was Sydserfif, afterwards Bishop of Galloway.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. xxix ster very highly esteemed as an eloquent preacher ; and it was in contemplation to name Baillie in the list of candidates as his successor. This proposal to translate him to such a conspicuous place in the Church, might have proceeded more from personal friendship than from any celebrity which he had then attained as a preacher. The circumstance itself appears from the following letter, which he addressed to Robert Fleming, who was one of the magistrates of the city,1 and who seems to have been a distant connection of his own, and also his wife's nephew. " For R. Fleming, Baylie of Edinburgh. December 1633. " My verie worthie and much-respected freind, " I have been hearing this long time a surmise that you had a mind to have me upon the leet for your vacant place in the Ministrie. Soe long as I took it for a clatter I misreguarded it, as manie moe of that kynd; but latelie being informed by my neighbour Mr. Da. Dicksone, that you certified him there was indeed such a purpose, I thought meet to shew my mind therein to yow, whom I tak to be the principall if not the only mover in that bussiness. I truelie think myself much obleidged to your love that makes yow conceave a possibilitie of meetness in me for a place that is farr above either my yeirs, or my learning, or any gift that I have for the present. But as I doe heartily thank yow for that opinion, whilk your love hes made you conceave of me, so I hope that the same love shall not suffer you to doe me wrong, at least such a greiff and hurt as the greatest enemie I have in the world could doe me no greater. It has pleased God so to joyne my heart to my people, and theirs to me, ever since my entrie among them, that to speak of a depairture it were to break no my heart alone, but of manie hundreds that are glewed to myne. This yow ought to consider who loves me, and whom nature commandes to have regard to the just greives of the paroch© of Kilwinning, and it were no more but for the sake of your dear Mother, who wes one of them. I know there is manie proud people in your Towne who thinks nothing to enslave and make subject any poore minister, or countrie paroche, to their humours, rather than to any just priviledge. Yet I think that these just greives and violent oppressions whereby God verie justlie hes begun, and is like to l Robert Fleming, merchant in Edinburgh, youngest baillie in 1G33, second baillie in 1637, and first baillio in 1647.XXX MEMOIR OF THE LIFE goe on, to punishe these proud men by the hands both of the Church and State men; I think, the sence of what they feell themselff[es] will make them be loath to greive or oppress any of their neighbours, who did them never wrong, but oft prayed to God for their weell. Beside, I pray yow remember that my opinions in Religion, which I never mind to dissemble, neither in private nor publict, they are such as could not be tolerat by many now there. To avow and practise manie of the Englishe Ceremonies, to count these schismatiques that holds it unlawfull to communicat with Kneelers, yow know it to be verie hatefull doctrine to many there ; and yet this is my mind, and long soe hes been : Also to preach against all points of Arminianisme and Papistrie, especiallie the doctrine of our new Cas-sandrian Moderators, yow know likewayes, how hatefull it is to these men who now are able, for few words, to put their brethren from their ministrie, yea cast them in the straitest prisones. These, therefore, be to chairge yow, in the name of God, who is the Master and freind of everie faithfull Minister, as yow would not greive me exceedingly, who ever hes respected yow as my good freind; as yow would not stirre up a godlie congregation to cry to God against yow, whom nature obleidged to be their freind ; as yow would not draw me, to that place wherein daylie I would have greives that my sillie weak spirit could not digest, beside the daylie danger, as times goes now, to be silenced, imprisoned, spoiled of my goods, liberties, and all that I have but God; and [in] your Toune cheifflie, if God be posting his just vengeance upon the land, why should your love move yow to drawe me under the first thunder bolt? As yow would not occasion all these evills, let me obtest yow yet againe, in the name of my Master, at this tyme never to name me; and if I be named by anie other, to stryve by all your might to shift me, so shall yow be sure of my best affection as one who hes delyvered me from that which I apprehended, and many moe heir who loves me, to be the greatest danger that possiblie could befall me. " I hope this my free letter yow will keep it to yourselff, and with the first occasion give me an answer; for I will be ever in suspense till, by your letter, yow have given me assureance to grant my most reasonable requeist." Fleming's answer to this letter has likewise been preserved, and is as follows :—OF llOBEET BAILLIE. xxxi " Loving Good Freind, " My heartly affection to your selff and my Aunt (though unacquainted) remembred : Your's I ressaved, and am sorie that any, especiallie yee, should have the occasion to be greived at your wisched presence in this place : the time hes been otherwayes: God remeed the present, and remove our sinnes, the occasion of all. As for your nameing to this place, out of that respect, in conscience to my judgment, I had to yow and your gift, yee are the first placed, and I am sorie at my heart, and many with me, that ever soe good men should be swa unwilling to be with us, especiallie now in thir pitifull dayes, wherein comfort of such men are maist requisite. All wayes, since I perceave your unwillingness, and your earnest desire otherwayes, persuade your selff I will endeavour, to the uttermost of my power (that is but little) to effectuat your will therein for the present. Since we heard of the coming of our new erected Bishop (to be playne) we are all in a dumpe, and swa in no settled resolution: God, of his infinite mercie, grant ane happie issue, and make us all yet in tyme to repent. The trew saying in God's word is now verified on our good late Pastor and kynd countrieman, that the righteous are taken away from the evill to come. Swa leaving to be tedious, wisheing yow all health and happiness, persuade your selff of me to remaine, Yours to his power, at command, Edinburgh, 5th December 1633. Robert Fleyming." These letters irrespective of their personal reference to Baillie, are worthy of notice as characteristic of the spirit of the times, and indicating the low state of religion in the Church. On the one hand, Baillie avows no dislike to Conformity, although hostile to the Arminian doctrines which most of the prelatic clergy had embraced; and while apprehensive of the ends at which that party were aiming, he was also aware of their policy not to tolerate any of their brethren who would hesitate to proceed in the same reckless course with themselves. On the other hand, his correspondent, holding in the metropolis an official situation of some importance, expresses his grief and despondency at the gloomy prospects which the state of religion presented. Edinburgh had recently been erected into an Episcopal see ; and the new Bishop, Dr. William Forbes, was considered in his sentiments to be not much opposed to popery.1 When Charles the 1 Baillio, vol. iii. p. 390; and Life of Forbes, in Lrving's Lives of Scotish Writers, vol. ii. pp. 6-9.xxxii MEMOIR OF THE LIFE First was in Scotland at his Coronation, in 1633, he might have perceived, from the reluctance manifested even by his courtiers to the English Service, as performed in the Chapel Royal, how much its forms were disliked. He ought also to have considered, if the people, with all their hereditary feelings of attachment to royal authority, could never be brought, during his father's reign, to a conformity with the Perth Articles, which had reference only to external ceremonies,1 it was not probable they would more readily acquiesce in still greater innovations, affecting both the doctrine and discipline of the Church. Prelacy had never been allowed as a standing office in the Church by any lawful Assembly in Scotland, but had constantly been regarded as " a great and insupportable grievance and trouble to the nation.11 It is nevertheless no improbable conjecture, that in the course of a few years the whole kingdom might have silently acquiesced in the proposed changes, had no coercive measures been employed for that purpose. The race of old Presbyterian Ministers would have become extinct; the Bruces, the Dicksons, and Calderwoods were in exile, or silenced and confined to remote districts, where it was supposed their influence or example would be inconsiderable; and although others of the clergy, opposed to the Perth Articles, were still allowed to exercise their ministerial functions, their number was daily lessening; nor would their places have been left vacant, as there are always " enow of such,11 who, for sordid motives, Creep, and intrude, and climb into the fold. As patronage was only extended to such as were disposed to unqualified conformity, already the chief places in the Universities and the Church were fast filling up with persons so inclined, by whose instructions the rising generation would have been embued with like sentiments ; and what an open and determined line of conduct so signally failed to accomplish, might in this way have been perhaps too easily secured by mere passive forbearance. In the meanwhile Baillie devoted himself to the duties of his own retired charge, and by assiduity and faithfulness, secured the best affections of his people ; for he at least was not one of those " hirelings,11 to whom The hungry sheep look up, and are not fed. If, at this time, he felt a kind of passive indifference as to the practice 1 The Articles were five in number, viz__Kneeling at the Communion; the Observance of Christmas, Easter, and three other Holydays; Private Baptism ; the Private Administration of the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper; and Episcopal Confirmation ; all in accordance with the Rites of the Church t>f England.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. xxxiii of particular ceremonies in public worship, he was by no means deficient in zeal for defence of the truth; as he endeavoured, by private conferences and long argumentative letters, to reclaim some of his friends from the Arminian and Popish tenets, which were fast creeping into the Church. Some of these letters, written in the years 1634 to 1636, are still preserved in manuscript, addressed to his cousin John Crichton, minister of Paisley; but in his case, without any good results, as he was finally deposed, on account of heretical doctrines, by the Assembly in December 1638. These studies, were, however, of advantage to himself, and proved eventually the means of bringing him into a more active sphere of public employment. In pursuance of the resolutions formed by Charles the First, for introducing hierarchical prelacy into Scotland, a book of Canons had been framed under the direction of Laud, Archbishop of Canterbury. The Court of High Commission was re-established,1 conferring powers for Bishops, not only to erect local subordinate Courts, in which any one Bishop with six assessors, might proceed summarily to try cases of immorality, sedition, and other offences, but likewise to deprive, fine, and imprison all ministers, masters of schools or Universities, and others, who should preach or speak in public against the present government, or against any of the conclusions passed at the Assembly at Perth. But sufficient time was not allowed, nor had the older Prelates resolution enough, generally to establish the proposed inquisitorial Courts. The more effectually also to promote the King's intentions, by increasing their power and influence, churchmen were advanced to the highest offices of state; Spottiswood, Archbishop of St. Andrews, was raised to the dignity of Lord Chancellor, and nine other Prelates were introduced as members of the Privy Council: and the usurping power they began to assume was a source of no small irritation to the nobility. A new Form of Public Service intended to supersede the Presbyterian forms of worship then used throughout Scotland, was in the course of preparation, and before this book had been seen or even completed, a missive letter was received from the King, which commanded " all our subjects, both ecclesiasticall and civill, to conforme themselves in the practise thair-of, it being the onlie Forme, which We, (having taken the counsell of our clergie,) think fitt to be used in God's publict worship there? 1 See the Royal Warrant for establishing the Court of High Commission in Scotland, 21st October 1634, inserted in this Volume, Appendix No. IV, p. 424.xxxiv MEMOIR OF THE LIFE The Proclamation of the Service-Book, on the 21st of December 1G36, in compliance with the King's missive letter to the Privy Council, was the first sound that excited general alarm over the whole kingdom; and at this precise time commences the series of Baillie's Letters and Journals. " The Proclamation of our Liturgy (he begins) is the matter of my greatest affliction. I pray you, if you can command any copy, by your money or means, let me have one, if it were but for two or three days, with this bearer. I am minded [resolved] to cast my studies for disposing of my mind to such a course as I may be answerable to God for my cariage. However, I am greatly afraid that this apple of contention has banished peace from our poor Church hereafter for ever.11 His education, habits, and relationship, inclined Baillie to adhere to the dominant party in the Church ; but their attempt to impose a particular form of Service which no one had seen, and without any other sanction than a royal mandate, he considered to be a just cause of alarm; yet his intentions were carefully to examine the book, and as far as conscience would permit, to give due obedience to his ecclesiastical superiors. He cannot however avoid remarking, that to impose a Book of new Canons, and to have the whole form of worship and discipline changed by a simple missive letter or Act of Privy Council, was a measure that would never have been attempted had Scotland been, as some persons alleged, merely " a pendicle of the diocese of York, instead of a separate Church and Kingdom.11 But the Proclamation, it is well-known, was so far premature, that the copies of the Liturgy were not ready for distribution till nearly three months after Easter 1637, the period which had been prescribed for its practice. When it was at length published, it seemed in such portions as differed from the Book of Common Prayer, to be a restoration of the Service of the Romish Church. It was not to be wondered, therefore, that ministers and people alike, who had evinced the strongest aversion to mere ceremonial innovations, should take alarm at what appeared to be so great a change in doctrine. " Now as concerning our Kirk,11 so writes Samuel Rutherford at this time, from his place of confinement at Aberdeen, " our Service-Book is ordained by open proclamation and sound of trumpet to be read in all the Kirks of this Kingdom. Our Prelates are to meet this moneth for it and our Canons, and for a Reconciliation betwixt us and the Lutherians. The Professors of Aberdeen Universitie are charged to draw up the Articles of a Uniform Confession: but Reconciliation withOF ROBERT BAILLIE. XXXV Popery is intended. This is the day of Jacob's visitation; the waves of Zion mourn; our gold is become dim; the sun is gone down upon our prophets; a dry wind, but neither to fan nor to cleanse is coming upon this land : and all our ill is coming from the multiplied transgressions of this land, and from the friends and lovers of Babel among us. . . . It I saw a call for New England, I would follow it.111 The tumult at Edinburgh, on the 23d of July 1637, on occasion of the first using the Service-Book, was the spark which kindled a flame that spread over the whole land. According to the deliberate judgment of the Privy Council, after minute investigation, they could only report to his Majesty that this " barbarous tumult," proceeded from " a number of base and rascall people."" It was an act altogether unpremeditated ; but the spirit of resistance having thus openly manifested itself, supplications from every part of the Kingdom were presented to the Council, urging, that the Service enjoined was contrary to the religion then professed, and that it was introduced in a most unwarrantable manner, without the knowledge or approbation of a General Assembly, and in opposition to Acts of Parliament. The clergy, nobility, and all ranks of people, flocked to Edinburgh, with such petitions against the use of the Liturgy : being encouraged by their increasing numbers, and irritated by delays and by the evasion of their first humble requests, they became sufficiently formidable ; and enlarging their demands, they at length succeeded not only in having the Service-Book withdrawn, but in restoring Presbytery in its purest form, and in relieving the Church from the thraldom of her pre-latic oppressors. From this time the history of the country is that of the Church, and it exhibits a succession of events partaking more of the character of romance than of scenes in ordinary life. But the history of that period is so well known, and Baillie's Letters furnish so full and distinct an account of the more remarkable occurrences of the time, that in this Memoir it will only be necessary to allude to such events as have some relation to the Author himself. Baillie, as we have seen, was hitherto in favour of a limited kind of Episcopacy. " Bishops (he says) I love; but pride, greed, luxury, oppression, immersion in secular affairs, was the bane of the Romish prelates, and cannot long have good success in the Reformed [Church] It was only by slow degrees that a decided change came over his sentiments, and 1 Lettur 51. To John Stuart, Provost of Ayr, now in Ireland, p. 118, edit. 1G75. VOL. I. /xxxvi MEMOIR OF THE LIFE that lie was led to co-operate with such of his brethren as had no scruples in regard to the total abolition of diocesan Episcopacy. When Lindsay, Archbishop of Glasgow, applied to him to preach before the Synod of Glasgow in August 1637, and desired him so " to frame his sermon to incite his hearers to the obedience and practice of the Canons of our Church and Service-Book, published and established by authoritie,11 his reply is that of an honest and conscientious man; and when new letters came, commanding him to do so upon his canonical obedience, but leaving the matter of his sermon to his own discretion, he resolved, he tells us, " to have spoken no syllable of any conformity, but pressed those pastoral duties which would not have pleased all.11 But from this dilemma he was accidentally relieved. About the same time, the prelates, for the most part, had raised " letters of horning,11 charging all ministers in their diocese to purchase two copies of the Service-Book, for the use of each parish, within 15 days, and the Presbytery of Irvine, of which Baillie was a member, agreed to supplicate the Privy Council to be freed from the charge. Finding such opposition to be general, this Act was suspended by the Privy Council. At the desire of his patron, Lord Montgomery, upon the entreaty of his father-in-law the Earl of Rothes, he attended a meeting of the Supplicants at Edinburgh, on the 18th of October. The nobility, gentry, and ministers, met in separate rooms for consultation. Ramsay, one of the ministers of Edinburgh, being chosen chairman of their meeting, inquired of each of the brethren, if he dissented from the Service-Book ; all of them did so, we are told, " both for matter and manner of imposing it. I was posed, (Baillie continues) somewhat more narrowly, because they suspected my mind in those things. I replied, with some piece of blushing in such ane auditory, the like whereof I had never spoken, that albeit I thought myself obliged in charitie to construct all that came from authoritie in the best sense that any veritie would permitt, yet I behooved to disapprove the [Service] Book, both for matter and manner; upon these reasons, which at more length I had to shew.11 Being urged to express his reasons, he adopted the method of proving the errors of the Service-Book by shewing, from a number of works published under Laud's authority, what were the avowed doctrines of " the book-makers.11 " A number of these passages (he adds) I had perqueir; so I was heard with very great applause, and ere even[ing] was too famous a man in all the toune, and intreated, that what I had said, or could say more to thatOF ROBERT BAILLIE. XXXVll purpose, I would put it in write ; for that way of proceeding was counted to be very advantageous to our cause." The renewal and solemn subscription of the National Covenant, on the last day of February 1638, forms a memorable era in the annals of our Church. Copies bearing the signatures of the leading Covenanters, Rothes, Loudoun, Cassillis, Montrose, and others of the nobility, gentry, and clergy, were sent to every part of the kingdom for local subscriptions. It might well be designated a National Covenant, from the enthusiasm manifested, and unprecedented unanimity that was displayed in signing it. To obviate the inconvenience of frequent meetings in great numbers, a board of commissioners from the different orders of Supplicants, under the designation of " The Tables,1'' was instituted, who were appointed to reside in Edinburgh, to deliberate and manage all their affairs. By such means, joyned to incessant vigilance, energy, and sound judgment displayed by the Supplicants, after every attempt to overcome them or to defeat their plans had failed, the King found himself constrained to yield to their demands by withdrawing the Service-Book and Book of Canons, by abrogating the High Commission, and by giving authority to call a meeting of Parliament and a free General Assembly. Of this memorable Assembly, which met at Glasgow on the 21st November, Baillie was returned a member by the Presbytery of Irvine ; and he has furnished us with a minute and interesting account of its proceedings. Although personally inclined to advocate moderate measures, he " resolved not to be a medler in anythingand being well lodged, and having brought with him a trunk filled with books and papers, he purposed " to read, and write, and studie all incident questions.11 On the 1st of December he was appointed, along with Dickson, to bring before the Assembly the subject of Arminian tenets, with which most of the Prelates and their adherents were charged. " Arminian-isme (he remarks) is a deep, and large, and intricat subject: our time was next meeting. Whatever I doe I would doe it in earnest; so without tyme I can doe nothing; alwayes there was no remead,11 and on the 4th of that month " I read to them, out of my blustered papers that which I sent you of Arminianisme. I got thanks for it, and was fasched many days in provyding copies of it to sundrie [persons].11 On the 6th of that month, he seems also to have submitted some of his papers against the Service-Book, forming the ground-work of his Parallel; but on a subsequent day, when the question of the abjuration of Episcopacy camexxxviii MEMOIR OF THE LIFE to be discussed in the Assembly, he drew general notice upon himself, as in opposition to the votes of all the other members, " Removed and Abjured," he alone voted that it was " Removed now, but never before Abjured for, according to their interpretation, all kinds of prelatic government in the Church had been condemned by the Confession of Faith. He was likewise placed in a similar minority on the following day, in regard to the abjuration of the Perth Articles. The Marquis of Hamilton, as King's Commissioner, on the eighth day quitted the Assembly, in the hope of abruptly terminating its further proceedings; but the members asserted their own inherent privileges, and continued their meetings, until having carried their several resolutions for rooting Episcopacy out of the Church, and for re-establishing Presbytery, the Assembly dissolved itself on the 20th of December 1638. In the spring of the following year, the King's preparations for war satisfied the Covenanters of the necessity of not remaining inactive. After presenting a respectful supplication to the King, to which the only answer given, was " the pitiful Declaration," " where we are contrare to all law and reason declared, in all the churches of England, the foulest traitors and re-bells that ever breathed; to remove the scruples that were still entertained by some of their adherents, as to opposing " our sweit Prince,11 their next care was to demonstrate the lawfulness of defence by arms. Baillie himself, who had hitherto, as he tells us, been accustomed to consider all opposition to civil authority as unlawful, was now so much convinced of its necessity, that on this head, he drew up a short paper, which was circulated in manuscript; and he also undertook to satisfy the objections of the Earl of Cassillis, who while at College had imbibed the same principles of unconditional submission with himself. When hostilities were proclaimed, and troops from various parts of the country poured into Edinburgh, Lord Eglintoun, he adds, " came away with the whole countrey at his back, and I as their preacher." The account he has preserved of the Scotish army, as they lay encamped on Dunse Law, about the 7th of June 1639, is very graphic, and exceeds in interest perhaps any passage in the whole extent of his correspondence. " It would have done you good (he says) to have casten your eyes athort our brave and rich Hill, as oft I did, with great contentment and joy; for I (quoth the wren) was there among the rest, being chosen preacher by. the gentlemen of our shyre, who came late with my Lord of Eglintoun. I furnished to half aOF ROBERT BAILLIE. xxxix dozen of good fellows, musquets and picks, and to my boy a broad-sword. I carried myself, as the fashion was, a sword, and a couple of Dutch pistols at my sadle ; but I promise, for the offence of no man, except a robber in the way; for it was our part alone to preach and pray for the encouragement of our countreymen. which I did to my power most cheerfullie.11 The troops were commanded by noblemen, the captains, for the most part, were landed proprietors, and the lieutenants, experienced soldiers, who had been employed in the wars of Gustavus Adolphus; the colours, flying at the entrance of each captain's tent, bore the Scotish arms, with the motto, For Christ's Crown and Covenant, in golden letters. There were some companies of Highlanders, " souple fellows, with their playds, targes, and dorlachs.11 But the soldiers were mostly stout young ploughmen, who encreased in courage and experience daily ; " the sight of the nobles and their beloved pastors dailie raised their hearts; the good sermons and prayers, morning and even, under the roof of heaven, to which their drums did call them for bells; the remonstrances verie frequent of the goodness of their cause ; of their conduct hitherto, by hand clearlie divine; also Leslie his skill and fortoun made them all so resolute for battell as could be wished. We were feared that emulation among our Nobles might have done harme, when they should be mett in the fields; bot such was the wisdome and authoritie of that old, little, crooked soldier, that all, with' ane incredible submission, from the beginning to the end, gave over themselves to be guided by him, as if he had been Great Solyman.1 Certainlie the obedience of our Nobles to that man's advyces was as great as their forbears wont to be to their Kings commands.11 He farther adds, " Had ye lent your eare in the morning, or especiallie at even, and heard in the tents the sound of some singing psalms, some praying, and some reading scripture, ye would have been refreshed.....For myself, I never fand my mind in 1 See vol. i. pp. 203, 211—214. It lias been stated that " The Covenant was received by their countrymen abroad in the Swedish service; and Alexander Leslie, a distinguished officer, was invited hy the Earl of Rothes to relurn as their future commanler to Scotland "—(Laing's Scotland, vol. iii. p. 168.) Baillie indeed mentions, (vol. i, p. Ill,) ,£ that General Leslie caused a number of our commanders subscryve the Covenant, and provided much good ammunition;" and also, (p. 191,) that the Committee at Edinburgh had the benefit of his advice, and that he called home a number of the officers of his regiments; but he himself must have returned to Scotland before any prospect existed that his services could be so required. The original passport, under the seal and signature of Charles the First, granting Sir Alexander Leslie of Balgonie permission to return to Scotland, dated the 20th March 1637 [1637-8?], is preserved among the papers of the Earl of Leven and Melville.xl MEMOIR OF THE LIFE better temper than it was all that tyme frae I came from home, till my head was again homeward; for I was as a man who had taken my leave from the world, and was resolved to die in that service without re-turne.1' Troops animated by such a spirit, and led by old and experienced commanders, would have proved irresistible. The royal forces were encamped at a short distance, and found they had nothing to expect but a determined resistance; but, to the satisfaction of both parties, and before any engagement took place, the pacification at Berwick, which was proclaimed on the 18th June 1639, produced a cessation of open hostilities, and the army of the Covenanters was disbanded. " Many were glad of this divine conclusion," says Baillie ; and he was led to hope that " this might be the comedick catastrophe of our verie fearfull-like Episcopall tragedie.-" But Charles, unfortunately for himself and the kingdom at large, had neither the prudence nor good faith to abide long by the terms of this pacification. By one of the Articles of agreement, a General Assembly was appointed to be held at Edinburgh in August 1639. Baillie, from his having opposed the Assembly's declaration respecting the abjuration of Episcopacy, was not returned as a member; and when he found this " somewhat disgracefull in many mouths," he consoled himself with the reflection, that he had furthered the good of the Church to the best of his power, ever since his entry to the ministry. The neglect which he thus experienced did not lessen the esteem of his friends in Glasgow, as supplications in the name of the City and University were presented to the Assembly, to appoint him to be translated from Kilwinning, as Minister of the High Church. The Reasons urged by Baillie against this request, (which was referred to the Synod of Glasgow), may be found in another part of this work. Nor was he less urgent, when the Synod met in October or November, to reiterate his Reasons against his proposed translation; it seems without effect: but when the Magistrates and Council sent a deputation to entreat him to comply with the ordinance of the Synod, he still resisted; and by the influence of powerful [friends, he succeeded for the time in being allowed to remain with his beloved flock, from whom he expressed his anxious desire never to be separated. From what has been stated, it will be seen that Baillie had directed his studies to a careful examination of the Service-Book, and Book ofOF ROBERT BAILLIE, xli Canons, in order to ascertain the avowed sentiments of the High Church party in England, and their aspiring followers in Scotland : and being deeply impressed with the conviction that the changes contemplated both in worship and doctrine would be fatal to the cause of true religion, he had too honest a mind to hesitate in acting upon his convictions. He therefore yielded the more readily, " in the midst of his very frequent and necessary distractions," to Warriston's solicitations, to publish the result of his inquiries. He could not say, with the great English poet, that by such an occupation he " was retarded from undertaking something that might be of use and honour to his countrybut being persuaded in his own mind " that a treatise of this kind was very needfull at this tyme to be published, both to show to the Churches abroad the true state of our controversies, and to waken up the spirits of our own countrymen,11 he was thus drawn from his retired and peaceful duties at Kilwinning (in the words of Milton, on a similar occasion,) " to imbark in a troubled sea of noises and hoarse disputes, put from beholding the bright countenance of Truth, in the quiet and still air of delightful studies.11 The first fruit of Baillie's labours was his treatise, entitled " Autokata-crisis; the Canterburian's Self-Conviction ^ which bears to have been " written in March, and printed in Aprile 1640.11 This publication was the chief cause of his being afterwards selected for employment in matters of public concernment. It displays considerable learning, and the subject is treated in his own peculiar mode, the margins being filled with an elaborate display of the actual words of the chief writers whom he controverts. In the month of July that year he was returned a member of the General Assembly held at Aberdeen. Soon after this period, the Scotish forces were again called into action; and having advanced into England, they obtained possession of Newcastle. On the 15th of October a letter from the Earls of Rothes and Montrose, and other members of the Council of War, contained a request that Baillie should attend the Committee with all convenient speed at Newcastle; and bring with him a number of copies of his Treatise, " with the warrands thereof, and all such papers and proofs which may serve for that purpose.11 This was accompanied with a letter from the Earl of Argyle, at Edinburgh, repeating the same request, and the noble writer expressed a wish to enjoy his company on his way thither if he arrived at Edinburgh before Saturday night. On these pressing invitations he set off for the camp on the 22dxlii MEMOIR OF THE LTFE of October; and on this, as on a former occasion, he thought it prudent to commit to writing his " Latter Will." Both these Testaments1 have been printed, as throwing some light on the state of his private affairs. Baillie reached the camp at Newcastle on the 6th of November, and was formally nominated one of the Commissioners who were to proceed to London, under the protection of the Great Seal, for conducting the treaty with the King. The other ministers were Henderson, Blair, and Gillespie; with whom were joined three noblemen, the Earls of Rothes, Loudoun, and Dunfermline, three barons, and three burgesses. His account of their journey from Newcastle is worthy of notice, as exemplifying the ordinary mode of travelling in those days. He describes the English inns as palaces, and the charges for entertainment as exorbitant. They were eleven days on the road, stopping the first Sunday at Darnton (or Darlington), and the following one at Ware. At the latter place, after being informed that prayers were ended, they entered the church, and " heard the minister preach two good sermons.11 Next morning they rode twenty miles before sun-rise, and reached London on the 16th. That same night the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, Wentworth Earl of Strafford, also reached London ; and two days afterwards he was arraigned before the House of Lords, and sent to the Tower on the charge of high treason. One of the first occupations of Baillie was to draw up " The Charge of the Scottish Commissioners against Laud Archbishop of Canterbury and the Earl of Strafford," which was exhibited to the House of Lords on the 17th December. It was printed at the time, and Baillie subsequently refers to it as his own performance. " Canterbury and the Lieutenant of Ireland their challenge, for the first draught and matter, was myne, though the last form, as oft all wryttes, was Mr. Henderson's.1,2 This was speedily followed with other publications; such as his " Parallel of the Liturgy with the Mass-Book," his " Antidote to Arminianism," a " Large Supplement to the Canter-burians Self-Conviction," and " The Unlawfulness of Limited Episcopacy." No portion of Baillie^ Letters has attracted more notice than that which contains his detailed account of Strafford's trial. His homely details and personal descriptions are much more graphic than the voluminous report of the proceedings and speeches published by Rushworth. We cannot 1 I have not included this in the list of his publications, because it is evidently a joint production of the Scotish Commissioners, and hears at least as evident marks of Henderson's hand as of Baillie's. 2 The first is dated the 4th of May 1639; the other the 22d of October 1640. See Vol. I, pages 245 and 267.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. xliii commend the language which he occasionally uses ; as where he says, " when we get his head, then all things will run smooth.11 But after this bold unfortunate man was beheaded on the 12th of May 1641, matters did not " run smooth i11 and Laud, as less worthy of notice, though the prime mover in all these unhappy contests, was allowed to linger out a much longer period before he experienced a similar fate. In a printed ballad, called " Scotland's Triumph over Rome, the Second Part,11 several of the leading persons of the time are mentioned, and Baillie, among the rest:— Bayhe is bold now with his subtile pen, At London, Laud to encounter, and defend His scrolls 'gainst England's Bishops and their minions, And in High Justice Court plead his opinions. The sufferings of the old Puritan ministers in the early part of Charles's reign, contributed in no small degree to alienate the people of England from any lingering attachment to Prelacy; and in the progress of civil events, the subject of the reformation of church government in England, began to be widely and openly discussed. " An Humble Remonstrance to the High Court of Parliament,11 by Bishop Hall, containing a defence of Episcopacy and the Liturgy, appeared in 1640, and gave rise to a con-troversy between the Prelatists and Puritans, which was carried on with great fierceness of spirit, and asperity of language. In particular, the writings under the name of " Smectymnuus,11 in answer to Hall's Remonstrance,1 had a powerful effect, and as Calamy affirms, " gave the first deadly blow to Episcopacy.11 The Scotish Commissioners indirectly aided in the great contest which then took place with the hierarchical establishment ; but having completed the task more immediately entrusted to them,2 they returned to Scotland in the beginning of June 1641. Baillie 1 In this struggle to render Episcopacy (in Baillie's words) " a poor plucked craw," Milton joined the side of the Puritans ; and in coming forward with his Apology for ' Smectymnuus,' and other tracts, he may have been influenced by his regard to Thomas Young, one of the writers, who for some years had been his preceptor. 2 Milton in his earliest tract, alludes to " the crooked ways of perverse and cruell men," with their " poore drifts to make a Nalionall Warre of a Surplice Brable, a Tippet-scuffle, and ingage the unattainted Honour of English Knighthood, to unfurle the streaming Red Crosse, . . for so unworthy a purpose, as to force upon their Fellow-subjects, that which themselves are weary of, the Skeleton of a Masse-Book ; and commending " the wisdom, the moderation, the Christian pietie, the constancy of our Nobility and Commons of England''; lie says, " Nor must the patience, the fortitude, the firme obedience of the Nobles and People of Scotland striving against manifold provocations, nor must their sincere and moderate proceedings hitherto, be unremembered, to the shamefull conviction of all their Detractors." He then has a noble address to both Nations:— " Goe on both hand in hand O Nations never to be dis-unitcd, be the Praise and the Ileroick VOL. I. gxliv MEMOIR OF THE LIFE describes their voyage as tempestuous and somewhat dangerous; more especially when sailing past the coast of Northumberland, and approaching Holy Island, " great was the fear of the whole companie; yet God brought us through that death, blessed be his name ! I resolve, (he adds) if I may goe by land, never more to sail that coast." Baillie was a member of the General Assembly that met at St. Andrews in July 3641, and he felt some alarm at the prospect of being put in nomination as Moderator. Besides the request for his translation to a parochial charge in Glasgow, he appears to have had nearly simultaneous offers of a professorship in each of the four universities; but he strongly resisted every attempt to remove him from his much-loved people and parish. These repeated solicitations however so vexed his mind, that he devised the new mode of preventing them in future, by addressing letters to Henderson, Blair, and Johnston of Warriston, to ascertain their sentiments, whether, in order to put an end to such annoyances, he could not obtain from the next General Assembly a special act in his favour authorizing him to remain unmolested in his present charge at Kilwinning. Their answers are still preserved, and concur in assuring him that any proposal* of the kind was not only unreasonable in itself, but would never be listened to. Finding thus that the Assembly which possessed uncontrolled power in such matters, might at once order him to be translated to some place less congenial to his habits than that of his birth and education, and where he still would be in the midst of his friends and relations, he, with some reluctance, in June 1642, accepted the invitation to become Dickson's colleague as joint Professor of Divinity in the University of Glasgow. The chair to which Baillie was appointed, had only recently been instituted ; as, according to the terms of the grant from the revenues of the Bishoprick of Galloway, the College was obliged to maintain a new Professor of Divinity. His admission took place on the 6th of July 1642, and on that occasion he pronounced an inaugural discourse, Be Hceretico- Song of all Posterity; merit this, but seeke only Vertue, not to extend your limits; for what needs? to win a faJing triumphant lawrell out of the teares of wretched Men, but to settle the pure worship of God in his Church, and justice in the State: then shall the hardest difficulties smooth out themselves before ye. . . . Commit securely to true Wisdome the vanquishing and uncasing of craft and suttletie, which are but her two runnagates: joyn your invincible might to doe worthy and godlike deeds; and then he that seeks to break your Union, a cleaving curse be his inheritance to all generations." (Of Reformation touching Church-Discipline in England, p. 69, Lond. 1641, 4to.)OF ROBERT BAILLIE. xlv rum Autocatacrisi} In accepting this office, as he entertained great scruples about relinquishing his ministerial functions, he undertook to officiate once a week, as minister of the Tron Church, without any increase of his salary as professor; but the Magistrates of Glasgow directed their treasurer to pay 100 merks " to Mr. Robert Baillie, for the transpor-tatione of his gudis to this burghe, in hope he will continue his services to the Towne."2 The following minute of the Visitors of the College serves to point out the respective duties of the Principal and two Professors of Divinity, and may be compared with his own account in a letter to Spang, 2d June 1643 :— " Sessio 2*1. September 17, 1642. " The Profession of Divinitie, latelie established by the Universitie, was found most necessar; and Mr. Robert Baylie, who was receaved to be a Professor, is ordained to have eight hundred pounds of stipend per annum, with a convenient lodging, or a hundreth merkes yearlie to pro-vyde one; together also with augmentation of stipend equall to the Prin-cipall and Mr. David Dickson; his entrie to his stipend, with the augmentation thereof, and ane hundreth merkes for his house, from the first of July 1642. " Anent the teaching of the course of Theologie by the Principall, and the other two Professors, it is ordained, That the Principall expone the hard places of Scripture; goe through the commoune places of Theologie, as he was accustomed to do other yeares; and preside to the disputis;— that Mr. David Dicksoune goe through the text of Scripture, and lykewyse handle Casuall Divinitie, as he may overtak it; and that he order the students their homilizing ;—that Mr. Robert Baylie teach the contraversies; and lykwyse the Oriental Tongues, and Chronologie, as he may overtak. The course is to be ended in the space of four years, and the Facultie to see to the way of going about it. " The Principall earnestly desyred that he might be disburdened of the greatness of the weight of the affaires of the Colledge, that lay for the present upon him; whereby he professed he was hindered exceedingly in per- 1 Thi9 discourse was afterwards printed at the end of his Opus Historicum et Chronologicum.,1663, fol. 2 On the 10th December 1642, (Memorabilia of Glasgow, p. 122) ; and in the Compteris Discharge, 17th November 1643, is this entry, " Item, for transporting of Mr. Robert Baillie his household geir, from Kilwinning to this Burghe, £66 : 13 : 4." (Ib. p. 127.) It is to be observed that these sums are Scotish money, of which Twelve Pounds were only equivalent to one Pound Sterling.xlvi MEMOIR OF THE LIFE forming the duties of his calling and professione.—The consideratione of this motione was remitted to a Committee, which was to be nominate for this and uther weightie businesses: And, in the meintyme, the Principall is desyred to go on in his part of the Profession, as his leasure may permitt, considering his present burdene ; quhilk burden the Visitors intreats him to continue under, till a way be found to disburden him, without the prejudice of the Oolledge affaires/11 It has been stated that Baillie at this time must have taken the degree of D. D.2 In one place of the College Records, he indeed has signed his name R. Baillie, Doctor et Professor SS. Theologice; which Dickson did in similar terms, while the other professors or regents also affixed the designation of their several offices; but this designation, although in nearly synonymous terms, signified nothing more than Teacher and Professor ; the term Doctor in this sense being still employed to designate an office, not an academical degree. Had such a degree been conferred on either Baillie or his colleague, they would unquestionably have made use of it; for although, at this period the Presbyterians did not confer such degrees, the title of Dr. was uniformly given to those who received it either at some foreign University, or during the times of Episcopacy, (as in the case of Howie, Strang, Panter, Forbes, and others) ; while Melville, Rollock, Boyd of Trochrig, John Cameron, Adamson, Ramsay, and other Principals or Professors of Divinity at that time, neither assumed the name, or were so designated.3 Thus the " Act concerning Mr. David Dicksone's admission to the Profession of Theologie," 27th February 1640,4 expressly states, that " the said Mr. David Dicksone promeises to undergo 1 Parliamentary Reports on the Universities of Scotland : Evidence, &c. App. p. 259, vol. ii, Glasgow, 1837, fol. 2 In some copies of the first edition of his Letters and Journals, he is described as Robert Baillie, D.D. 3 The Doctor, or Interpreter of Scripture, was recognised as a distinct office in the Church, by the General Assembly, August 1574; and a petition was presented to the Regent to appoint competent salaries to such learned men as were willing to teach in Universities. It was also the title given to the Assistant masters in Grammar Schools, the Head Master being simply called the Master, or Rector. The nature of the office in the Church was discussed by the Assembly of Divines at Westminster in 1643, (see vol. ii. p. 110) ; and it was allowed to fall into disuse. A graduation of Doctors of Divinity having taken place at St. Andrews, after King James's visit, on the 29th of July 1617, Robert Howie, Peter Bruce, James Martine, Principals of the Three Colleges of St. Andrews; and also Mr. John Strang, and three other persons, " were inaugurat Doctors. Thi* noyelly, (say9 Calderwood) was brought in among us, without advice or consent of the Kirk."— (Hist. p. 656.) 4 Records of (he University of Glasgow.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. xlvii the Office and charge of ane Professor and Doctor of Theologie within the said Colledge and the synonymous terras Professor and Teacher of Theology, occur likewise in the following minute of the College, respecting Baillie's own appointment and emoluments : " At the Colledge of Glasgow, the thretteine day of Apryll the zere of God, Jm VJ° fourtie-thrie zeirs; fforsamekill as Mr. Robert Baillie, lait Minister at Kilvynning, being called be the Governours, Professours and Maisters of the Universitie of Glasgow, to the professione of Theologie, hes accepted the said calling, and vndertakine the Office and charge of a Professor and Teacher of Theologie within the said Colledge ; and be thir presentis obleidges him to teache weiklie publick lectors of Theologie within the said Colledge, and to attend diligentlie vpone the studentis thairof for their instructione; Thairfor, it is aggried and condiscendit be Doctor Johnne Strang, Principall of the said Colledge, Mr. Dauid Dick-sone, Professor of Theologie ther and Deane of Facultie, Mr. Robert Mayne, Professor of Medecine ther, Masters Dauid Monro, Johne Dick-sone, Dauid Forsyth, James Dalrymple, and William Semple, Regentis ther, with the speciall adwyse and consent of Mr. Archibald Flemyng of Catgill, Rector of the said Universitie; That the said Mr. Robert Baillie shal be payed zeirlie furth of the frie rentis of the Bisschoprick of Galloway, laitlie mortified and annexed to the said Colledge, ffor his zerelie stipend, frome his entrie, q1* is reckoned to be the first of July in the zeir of God Jm V Jc ffourtie-twa zeirs, during his service of the said cuire, the soume of aucht hundrethe punds money of Scotland, togidder w* one hun-drethe merks money zeirlie, for his house maill in Glasgow, and that at twa termes in the zeir, Candlemas and Lambes, or within fyftene dayes thairefter, be equall portionnes; begynnand the first termes payment thairof at Candlemes last by past, in this instant zeir of God Jm- VJC-ffourtie-thrie zeiris, and so therefter to be continowed in thankfull payment from his entrie foirsaid, during his serving of the cure within the said Colledge, furth of the said frie rentis of the Bischoprick of Galloway ; and lykwayes it is expresslie provydit, in caise the said Mr. Robert shal continow to preach within the said burgh of Glasgow, that quhatso-evir benefit or stipend he sail receave or obtaine thereby, sail be allowed be him in pairt of payment of his said stipend of aucht hundrethe punds money, and that the Colledge be releived of the payment of the sums pro tanto. And lykwayes it is aggreed and condiscended, that in caise thexlviii MEMOIR OF THE LIFE Principal!, the remanent Professors and Regentis of the said Colledge, and the Minister of Govan, sail bruike and receive zeirlie the several! augmentations of their stipends, q1* is by and attour the quantitie of the stipends quhairin they wer in possessione befoir the last Parliament, and that con-forme to the report maid to his Majestie the tyme of the said last Parliament, of the necessar charges for mantenances of the said Colledge, be the Commissioners appoynted be his Matie for that effect, and his Matie'& gift ratified in the Parliament following thereon, then, and in that caice, and in no otherwayes, the said Mr. Robert Baillie sail have also ane augmentatione of his stipend zeirlie, from his entrie, during the tyme of his seruice of the cuire, off twa hundreth punds money to be payed out of the Tentis of the said Bischoprick of Galloway. In witnes quherof, thir presents be Mr. John Harbertsone, writer, and scryb to the said Uni-versitie, ar sub4 as followis :— R. Baillie. M. A. Fleming, Rector. John Strang, Principal. Jo. Dalrymple. David Dickson. Da. Forsythe. Ro. Mayne. W. Semple. Da. Monro. Jo. Dickson But the course of Baillie's academical instructions was speedily to be interrupted by employment of a more public kind. At the Assembly, held at St. Andrews in July 1642, there was read a letter from a number of ministers at London, " shewing their desire of Presbyterian Church-Government, and a full union with our Church.''1 At the same time, Lord Maitland was appointed to proceed to England, as the bearer of a supplication to his Majesty, with authority to treat with the English Parliament for peace, agreeably to a request contained in their declaration, presented to the Assembly. After his return from this negotiation, a meeting of the Commission was held, to receive his Lordship's report; and Baillie says, " he delyvered to us the Parliament of England's returne, granting all our desyres, in abolishing of Bishops, and requiring some of our ministers to assist at their Synod against the 5th of November, or when it might be called. Of this we were verie glad, and blessed God." In compliance with this request, the meeting made choice of Henderson, Douglas, Rutherford, Gillespie, and Baillie, as commissioners to the proposed Assembly of Divines ; and upon a suggestion of Baillie's, at first disregarded,OF ROBERT BAILLIE. xlix but afterwards unanimously adopted, the meeting resolved upon joining in commission with these ministers three ruling elders; and accordingly appointed the Earl of Cassillis, John Lord Maitland, and Johnston of Warriston. Each and all of the commissioners expressed their disinclination for the employment; yet, as Baillie observes, " no man was gotten excused j"1 but he adds, " the miserable condition of the English affaires have yet keeped us all at home." The great object contemplated, of settling the form of Church-Government to be established in the room of Prelacy, although delayed by the course of political events, was not forgotten. An Assembly of Divines was summoned to meet at Westminster on the 1st of July 1643, in order to consult on the settlement of the affairs of the (Church, not in the usual form of Convocation, or of a free Synod, but by an ordinance of Parliament, to which certain of their own members were joined, and commissioners from Scotland were invited. Little was however done till after the meeting of the General Assembly at Edinburgh in the ensuing month of August. Sir Henry Vane younger, and other commissioners from the Parliament of England, accompanied with two ministers, Marshall and Nye, having arrived in Edinburgh, they presented letters to the same purpose with a declaration of both Houses of Parliament, " shewing their care of reforming religion," and renewing " their desire of some from our Assembly to join with their Divines for that end ; and withall, our Assemblies dealing, according to their place, for help from our State to them." These solicitations, and the speeches of the Commissioners, suggested the expediency of framing some bond of union between the two nations, for mutual reformation and defence. The English commissioners at first were for a Civil League, the Scotish members for a religious Bond. A draught ; was submitted by Henderson of what is now known as The Solemn League and Covenant, which embraced both objects ; which being read, was formally adopted, with great satisfaction, by the Convention of Estates, as well as by the General Assembly, on the 17th of August; and it was ordered to be transmitted to the Parliament of England for their approbation. The Assembly then renewed their Commission to the members who should assist the Assembly of English Divines. Baillie was under great apprehension of being one of the three, as a quorum, who were ordered without l Robert Douglas was an exception, as his constant employment at home, or his attendance on the army, prevented his going to London.1 MEMOIR OF THE LIFE delay to proceed to London, to procure the ratification of the Covenant. The Commissioners set sail from Leith on the 30th of August; and by an ordinance of the House of Commons, on the 14th, and of the House of Lords on the 16th of September, Lord Maitland, Henderson, and Gillespie, and also Robert Meldrum, were admitted to the Assembly of Divines " to be present there, and to debate upon occasion." These Commissioners were accordingly introduced, and welcomed by the Prolocutor and others, to which Henderson made a suitable reply ; and the same day, says Dr. Lightfoot, " after all was done, Mr. Prolocutor, at the desire of the Assembly, gave thanks to God for the sweet concurrence of us in the Covenant.11 The Covenant likewise passed both Houses with singular unanimity, and was solemnly sworn and subscribed on the 25th of September. When the Assembly were permitted to consider the question of the form of Church Government to be recommended, no very sanguine hopes were entertained, according to Baillie, " of their conformitie to us, before our armie be in England. However, (he continues) they have called earnest-lie once and againe for Mr. Rutherfoord and me. The Commission hes convenit and sent for us. We are thus far in our way to goe aboord, God willing, one of those days. The weather is uncertaine, the way dangerous, pirates and shoals not scant; yet trusting on God, we must not stand on any hazard to serve God and our countrey." Having reached London in safety, on the 18th of November, the usual warrant was passed ; it being " Ordered by the Lords and Commons in Parliament assembled, that Mr. Robert Baily and Mr. Samuel Rutherford shall' be admitted into the Assembly [of Divines], to be present there, and to debate upon occasion.11 ' Accordingly, we learn from Lightfootfs Journal, that on Monday the 20th of November, " There was read a Commission from Scotland that sent Mr. Robert Baily and Mr. Samuel Rutherford, and an order from the Houses that gave them access to our Assembly; after which, they were fetched in, and Mr. Prolocutor made a speech for their welcome.11 Baillie himself gives a similar account, and remarks, that without such an order in writing, " no mortal man may enter to see or hear, let be to sitt; and when we were brought in, Dr. Twisse had ane long harangue for our welcome, after so long and hazardous a voyage, by sea and land, in so unseasonable tyme of the year. When he ended, we satt doun in these places which since we have keeped.11 l Journals of the House of Lords, vol. vi. p. 306 ; and the Journals of Commons, vol. iii. p. 3 J 4.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. li According to his usual custom, Baillie describes the appearance of the place of meeting of this memorable Assembly, with the forms of proceeding, and gives occasional notices of the chief speakers. The discussions on the various points of ecclesiastical polity submitted to their consideration, were long and tedious, however important; and have been more fully reported by other writers.1 At this time, as well as during their former mission to London, the Scotish Commissioners resided in Worcester House,8 in the City, and St. Antholin's Church3 was set apart for their use, the ministers preaching in their turn, for a time, at least, to very crowded audiences. " The people throngs to our sermon (he says in January 1641), as ever you saw any to Irwin [Irvine] communion; their crowd daylie encreases.11 Lord Clarendon also refers to their great popularity at that time. The Treaty being now adjourned to London, the Scotish Commissioners, he states, " came thither in great state, and were received by the King with that countenance, which he could not choose but shew to them ; and were then lodged in the heart of the city, near London-Stone, in a house which used to be inhabited by the Lord Mayor or one of the Sheriffs, and was situated so near to the church of St. Antholins, that there was a way out of it into a gallery of the church. This benefit was well foreseen on all sides in the accommodation, and this church assigned to them for their own devotions, where one of their own chaplains still preached, (amongst which Alexander Henderson was the chief, who was likewise joined with them in the treaty in all matters which had reference to religion;) and to hear those sermons there was so great a conflux and resort ____ that from the first appearance of day in the morning on every Sunday, to the shutting in the light, the church was never empty." 1 An interesting and valuable Journal of the Assembly of Divines, from 1st January 1643 to 31st December 1644, by Dr. John Lightfoot, is contained in the last volume of his Works, published at London 1824, 13 vols. 8vo. A similar Journal by George Gillespie, from September 1643 to October 1644, is still unpublished. See Vol. ii. p. 49$, and vol. iii. p. 449 [469] of the present work. Another MS. Journal, in 3 vols, is preserved in Williams's Library, Red-Cross Street London, and has been attributed, upon satisfactory grounds, to Dr. Thomas Goodwin. (Orme's Life of Owen, p. 400.) 2 This was not the house of the Earls of Worcester, which Lord Clarendon afterwards inhabited, on the site of the present Beaufort-buildings in the Strand; but Worcester Place, the house of John Tiptoft, Earl of Worcester, Lord High Treasurer of England, also on the banks of the Thames, but nearer the Tower. 9 The Church of St. Antholin or St. Anthony, which had been repaired in 1616, at considerable expense, was destroyed in the great fire in 1666, but it was afterwards rebuilt. VOL. I. hlii MEMOIR OF THE LIFE After stating that some attended out of humour or faction; others out of curiosity, or to discover grounds for the contempt " already felt," he adds, that their exercise or style of preaching, " except to palates and appetites ridiculously corrupted, was the most insipid and flat that could be delivered upon any deliberation."1 But such an opinion is equally prejudiced and unfounded ; as the sermons which they preached before the Houses of Parliament, and which were printed at the time, need fear no comparison with those of the most learned English divines of that age; and, as Mr. Brodie has observed, " if we may form an estimate of their pulpit-oratory from their works, we may safely pronounce that the English did not discredit themselves by flocking to hear such preachers."2 After more than twelve months unremitting diligence in prosecuting the objects for which they had been commissioned, it was thought proper that some of their number should attend the next General Assembly to report the progress that had been already made. Baillie and George Gillespie were deputed for this purpose. They set out from London on horseback on the 6th of January 1645, and reached Newcastle on the 18th of that month " verie wearie, and fashed with a long evill way," and " the excursions of the enemy from Newark, hazardous." On Sunday the 19th, after preaching in St. Nicholas's Church, they rested that day; and next morning having resumed their journey, they arrived at Edinburgh on Wednesday evening. On Thursday, being the second day of the Assembly, Baillie made a speech, shewing with what unanimity the Parliament of England had not only abolished the Ceremonies and the Service Book which were the first grounds of complaint, but had plucked up the " root and all the branches of Episcopacie in all the King's dominions;" and were in a fair way to have Presbytery established, according to the forms of the Directory that had been prepared and approved of, as suited for both Kingdoms. " Such stories lately told," he remarked, " would have been counted fancies, dreams, meer impossibilities; yet this day we tell them as deeds done, for the great honour of God, and, we are persuaded, the joy of many a godlie soul. If any will not believe our report, let them trust their own eyes; for behold here are the warrant of our words, written and subscryved by the hands of the Clerks of the Parliament of England, and the scribes of the Assemblie there." A similar statement 1 History of the Rebellion, vol. i. p. 331. Oxford. 1826, 8 vols. 8vo. 2 History of the British Empire, vol. iii. p. 41. Edinb. 1822, 4 vols. 8vo.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. liii being made by Gillespie, each of them was heard " with great applause and contentment of all." Baillie took advantage of this opportunity to visit his family at Glasgow, and after an absence of sixteen months, to his great joy he found " all in health and welfare.11 He had requested some of his friends in the Assembly " to deal for his abiding at home : but there was no remeid; both of us were ordained with diligence to goe back.11 They accordingly returned by sea before the end of March. Their voyage must have been stormy, as the vessel was driven to the coast of Holland, and having taken shelter in the Maese, this interruption enabled them to land, and to spend some days at Middleburg and Rotterdam, enjoying the company of Spang, and other friends.1 In his first letter to his cousin after reaching London, Baillie says, " you know how graciouslie the Lord brought me throw the seas. The storme, a little before, had been so extraordinarie, that many here thought we had been cast away.11 He was soon after appointed to preach on a day of public humiliation before the House of Lords in the Abbey Church, Westminster, 30th of July; and he took for his subject, as he entitled his sermon, " Errours and Induration are the great Sins and the great Judgements of the Time.11 It was printed by order of the House, accompanied with the usual thanks " to Master Baylie for the great pains he took in his sermon.11 The previous year, 28th of February 1643-4, he preached on a similar occasion before the House of Commons, and his sermon, " Satan the Leader in Chief of all who resist the Reparation of Sion,11 was also printed, and, as might be inferred from the title, has special reference to the affairs of the Church. In the preface, he asserts that the first care of the State should be the settling of the Church; and glancing at the bitter fruits of anarchy, he enlarges on the slow progress made in the Assembly's consultations, and says, " if these points of Government, of Worship, of Doctrine, which yet are before us, be handled as these that are behind us ... this course ... cannot but hold us in hewing of our stones, more than a week of years, before we can begin to lay so much as the founda- 1 It appears that Baillie and Gillespie were at Rotterdam on the 5th of April, the day appointed for fasting and solemn prayer, as recommended by the " Seasonable Warning'' of the General Assembly ; and being invited to attend a meeting of Consistory, they aided, along with John Durie and Lord Forbes, in adjusting some disputes that had arisen in the Scotish congregation, of which Alexander Petrie, the ecclesiastical historian, was minister. See Dr. Steven's History of the Scotish Church in Rotterdam, p. 15. Edinb. 1632, 8vo.liv MEMOIR OF THE LIFE tion of our building."" About this time, Baillie produced his " Dissuasive from the Errors of the Time." In his dedication to the Earl of Lauderdale, he speaks of his studies on this head as interrupted, " being called away from my present station by those who set me therein, upon the occasion your Lordship knows.11 This was to return to Scotland, along with Henderson and others, to assist in healing the dissensions which prevailed among the nobility and persons of rank, in conducting the affairs of State. But when ready to set out, their journey was postponed in consequence of Henderson's indisposition, joined with the request of the London ministers, as his presence was considered indispensable for carrying through and completing the proposed measures of uniformity in Church-government and Discipline. But while the Assembly of Divines continued to discuss such points, the contests betwixt the Royalists and the Parliament's forces, were carried on with varying fortunes. Scotland at this time was in a very miserable condition, occasioned partly by the devastations of Montrose's followers, partly by famine and a desolating pestilence ; and the consequent inability of recruiting their army in England with fresh troops and money, was attended with the most unhappy results. Baillie in one place, referring to some controverted point, " with which, we propose not to meddle in haste, untill (he adds, with quaint simplicity,) it please God to advance our Armie, which we expect will much assist our arguments and again at a later date, " had our Armie been bot one 15,000 men in England, our ad-vyce would have been followed quicJclie in all things; but our lamentable posture at home, and our weakness here, makes our desyres contemptible.1'' This delay in settling the form of Church-government was in the first instance mainly owing to the pertinacious and argumentative spirit of the Independents, who were members of Assembly and supported the principle of congregational churches ; but their opposition would have been ineffectual, had not increasing numbers in the army and the House of Commons espoused similar sentiments. It is usual to assert that the first correct notions of toleration or religious liberty originated with the Independents. The Presbyterians in both kingdoms were indeed strongly opposed to allowing toleration of any sects; and it must be admitted, that the Ecclesiastical Courts, Presbyterian as well as Prelatic, when they had the power, displayed no unequivocal symptoms of inquisitorial judicatures. Had Church-government been established in both Kingdoms, in the formOF ROBERT BAILLIE, lv proposed, doubtless in such an event, the rules of discipline would have been strictly enforced, and their proceedings might, in some measure, have justified the ordinary accusations of intolerance and persecution. But when we look into the history of that period, and consider the effects of such license, in the rapid growth of heresies of all kinds, and the bitter spirit that was engendered among the various sects, it would be unjust to accuse Baillie and his friends as alone chargeable with intolerance; and he himself strives to vindicate the Presbyterians from whatever could be said to evince a persecuting spirit. The Independents, it is true, asserted the right of liberty to themselves in matters of religion, and also urged the plea of toleration of all sects however erroneous ; but it is not less certain, that when the full power was in their own hands, they manifested no particular inclination to extend such liberty to their opponents; and more especially by no means to tolerate any Preacher who shall oppose that their liberty} Neither were the Malignants or Prelatists inclined to allow such measures to pass without opposition. Maxwell, Bishop of Ross, having published some calumnious attacks on his Presbyterian brethren, Henderson had been requested to write a reply to these calumnies; but before he could commence it, owing to his increasing labours and infirmities, he was called away to Newcastle, from whence, after his well-known conferences with the King, he returned to Edinburgh, and died within eight days of his arrival, on the 18th of August 1646, to the irreparable loss of the Church and country. The task having been previously devolved on Baillie, he published " An Historicall Vindication of the Church of Scotland," which he dedicated to his old friend and preceptor Robert Blair. This was shortly afterwards followed, by a " Second part of his Dissuasive," also addressed to the Earl of Lauderdale, containing a further exposure of the new generation of Sectaries that had sprung up, in those days of universal toleration. In his former dedication, he exclaims, " would to God I that our controversies were brought to a happy period. ... Your Lordship is conscious to the first designs of the noble patriots of that your Nation, it was never their mind to have trifled so much time in jangling with their Brethren of this Isle, about new and needlesse questions; but expecting a facility of settling truth and peace within these seas, their hearts were 1 See Baillie's Anabaplism the true Fountaine of Independency, &c. Lond. 1647, 4to, and Dr. M'Crie's Miscellaneous Works, (Review of Orme's Life of Owen,) pp. 507, 509. Edin. 1641, 8vo.Ivi MEMOIR OF THE LIFE farther abroad, their thoughts were large for the propagation, not of their own, but of Chrisfs kingdom, and that not so much in the light as in the heat and life thereof? In the second dedication he laments the " wofull spectacles of our times,11 by pointing at " the danger wherein not only families, but the whole fabrick of our Churches and Kingdomes doe for the present stand ; while the Episcopall and Sectarian factions are doing their utmost endeavours to have all our former sufferings to be but short prologues to new very prolix, if not endless, tragedies C the one party, he asserts, being " demented with a frantick passion towards the government and services of the Church of Romethe other, claiming " liberty to overthrow our Parliaments, all Kings, all Lords, and this House of Commons ; to set up the individuals (as they love to speak) of the whole multitude, in the thrones of absolute sovereignty. . . . This yoak, much worse than a Turkish slavery, must be put upon our body, but a worse upon our soul,11 &c.; being " the reward which the Sectaries plead for, as due to their labours in the war against the common enemy.11 But Baillie indignantly disclaims " their great deservings,11 and asks " where did the most of them lurk when the heat of the day did scorch the valiant labourers of both Nations; when Ruthven, Newcastle, Rupert, Hopton, did keep the field with armies of any number or vigour; when noble Essex, at Keinton, had the King, in the prime vigour of his strength, upon his army ; when Leslie, about Bawdoun, was compassed for some weeks, in the bare fields with frost and snow, with wants of all kinds, with the very gallant army of Newcastle, double in number, and much better provided than any thing that Prince Rupert could bring to Naisby V Sec. And he further asks, when trumpeting their own praises, " what if such a piece of soldiery had fallen in their hands as Massie's defence, and Essex rescue of Gloucester ; as Essex and the Londoners fought at Newbury; as David Leslie^ march and medly at Philiphaugh; as Pointz enterprize near Chester?11 &c. —But to look after the " swarm of heresies and sects that darkens the sun of truth, fills the air with noxious vapours, and is ready, upon a little more encrease, to fall down on the earth, for the overwhelming of the State as well as the Church,11 was Baillie's peculiar province rather than to settle the comparative merits of military exploits; or to expose the vauntings of the Sectarian forces at their successes, when they had no longer to contend with the full strength and vigour of the Royalists, already discomfited by other arms-OF ROBERT BAILLIE. Ivii In December 1646, the three Commissioners who still remained in London, were each of them anxious to turn their steps homewards after such a protracted absence. Permission for one of their number, to be fixed by themselves, having been given, Baillie obtained his wish, as he could urge the sickness of his wife and three of his children, for the necessity of a speedy return to his charge in the College; while both Gillespie and Rutherford, having their wives and families with them in London, " in the dead of winter, could not easily get them transported.11 He travelled in company with the Lord Chancellor and Lord Lauderdale; and at the meeting of the Commission of Assembly held at Edinburgh, in January 1647, he presented the Confession of Faith, and the new metrical version of the Psalms.1 He also attended the General Assembly in August that year, and Gillespie having then returned, their speeches on that occasion will be found in the present work. After briefly stating, " to the great satisfaction of all,11 the progress that had been made in the several things entrusted to their management in London, and laying before the Assembly copies of the Confession, Directory, Catechisms, and Psalms, Baillie passed a deserved encomium on his two colleagues,2 Gillespie and Rutherford, and spoke in most affectionate terms of Henderson, who, having " spent his strength, and worn out his days in the service of God, and of this Church,11 " in his inmost sense,11 he esteemed, " ought to be accounted by us, and the posteritie, the fairest ornament, after John Knox, of incomparable memory, that ever the Church of Scotland did enjoy.11 Of his own labours, he spoke with becoming modesty, confessing, that in the Assembly of Divines he had remained silent, following the example of others better qualified than himself for such debates. But if merely a spectator, he was not idle ; he never " had too little adoe any dayand among other occupations he made it his business to give such information to their friends both at home and abroad, as might be required. This communicative disposition sometimes indeed involved himself and others in trouble ;3 but 1 See the Notices of our present Metrical Version of the Psalms, in which Baillie so much interested himself, in the Appendix to vol. iii. p. 525. 2 Some line3 in the form of a dialogue between the author and Eccho, in praise of Henderson, Gillespie, Rutherford, and Baillie, as " four Fathers in Divinity,'' are to be found in a scarce volume of poems entitled " Anglise Speculum, or England's Looking Glasse, by Captain William Mercer," sig. M. 2. Lond. 1646, 4to. 3 See Papers relating to Lord Digby's intercepted letter, in the Lord Savile's business, vol. ii. pp. 281-285, 487, &c. ; and his Information to Cranford, il>. p. 279, &c. ; also his letter supposed to have been addressed to Christopher Love, in December 1650, vol. iii. p 185.Iviii MEMOIR OF THE LIFE so much were his conduct and labours approved of by the English Parliament, that when he took leave of the Assembly, he received from them a public testimonial of their favour. This appears to have been a silver cup, bearing a suitable inscription, which was then voted to him, and which remained in the possession of his descendants till a recent period, if it be not still preserved.1 But while the Assembly rejoiced in the progress made in their Covenanted Uniformity they had also cause of serious alarm. The increasing power and success of Cromwell, the successive defeats of the Royalists, and the inconsiderable number of the Scotish forces remaining in England, placed the balance in the hands of the Independents, and at length put an end to the hope so long and ardently cherished of seeing Presbytery established in that Kingdom, at the very time when it seemed to be on the eve of its accomplishment. That it might have been otherwise had Scotland been able to have sent proper reinforcements instead of a small number of raw and inexperienced recruits, has already been stated ; nor was Baillie far wrong in his conjectures that in this way the discussions both in the Assembly and Parliament would have been brought to a speedier termination. When we consider the policy of the leading persons in Parliament, and how that the Assembly itself possessed scarcely the semblance of power,2 and when to all this we add the encreasing dislike that was entertained of the Scotish nation, it can be matter of no surprise that the great object of Uniformity was defeated. But although frustrated in the object itself, happily the unwearied labours, the prayers, and the keen and searching discussions of this Assembly of Divines, during a period of four long years, were thereby rendered neither unavailing nor of little importance ; and the fruits of all their anxious deliberations are enjoyed and acknowledged at the present day. It was a pertinent remark by one of the most respected divines of our Church at that time, when, speaking in commendation of " the noble friends of Sion who have put their shoulders to the work of settling Religion and the kingdome of Christ among us," he adds, " whose labours, albeit they should have no other fruit in our time than the right stateing of the question between us and all adversaries of the true doctrine, worship and discipline of Chrisfs house, as it is set down in the Confes- 1 In the possession, it is believed, of Madame Racchia, (daughter of General Baillie,) who resides in Turin. 2 See remarks in Dr. Price's History of Protestant Non-conformity, vol. ii, p. 246, &c.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. lix sion of Faith, in the Directory for Public Worship, and in the Rules of Government of Christ's Church drawn from Scripture warrant; yet even that much is worth all the expense of whatsoever is bestowed, by any, or all the Lord's worthies, upon religion.''''1 This country at least has now for two centuries benefited by the labours of perhaps the most learned and pious Divines ever assembled.2 The shorter Catechism contains a very brief compendium of Christian doctrine, digested with admirable skill; and to their early familiarity with this Catechism, we are disposed to ascribe much of that superiority of intellectual culture which so honourably distinguishes the peasantry of Scotland. The Confession of Faith, as well as the Catechisms, with the Forms of Discipline, and of Church-government, which were completed, and ratified at the time by the Civil as well as Ecclesiastical authorities, as the public Formularies to be adopted in the religious Union of the three Kingdoms, are still the standards of our Church; and, under the blessing of Divine Providence, we believe that these have proved the chief means of preserving in purity of faith, and close adherence to revealed truth, not only the Established Church of Scotland, but the great body of Presbyterian Dissenters throughout Great Britain and Ireland, as well as in the United States, and in the British Colonies. From this period, except on one occasion, Baillie's pursuits and employments were limited either to his duties in the University, or to the proceedings of the ecclesiastical courts. Before his appointment as a professor, he had been one of the stated Visitors of the College of Glasgow; and in August 1643, he refers to a subsequent Visitation which had been of service " in getting all matters settled as we could have desyred." The minutes of these several Visitations contain a variety of particulars concerning the course of education, and the proposals made for its improvement.3 On resuming his duties in 1647, after the long interruption by his residence in England, Baillie was one of the chief movers in carrying into effect the Act of the Assembly, 7th of February 1645, which contained " Overtures for advancement of Learning and good Order in Grammar 1 Dickson's Brief Explication of the Book of Psalm9, 3d part. London, 1655. 8vo. 2 There is a work less known than it deserves, although the materials are unskilfully digested, entitled " Memoirs of the Lives and Writings of those eminent Divines, who convened in the famous Assembly at Westminster, in the seventeenth century. By James Reid, minister of the gospel. Paisley, 1811-5, 2 vols. 8vo. 3 See Parliamentary Reports on Universities, vol. ii, Glasgow, pp. 258, 2G1, App. VOL. I. ilx MEMOIR OF THE LIFE Schools and Colledges,11 and by which it was provided that Commissioners from all the Universities of the Kingdom " should meet and consult together for the establishment and advancement of piety, learning, and good order in the schools and Universities, and so farre as is possible, an uni-formitie in doctrine and good order.11 The plan of introducing a uniform and systematic course of study to be pursued in all the Colleges, seems to have been long cherished by Baillie. Several meetings of the Commissioners took place at Edinburgh, in August 1674 and July 1648, at which he attended, as we learn from the minutes of their proceedings;1 but the scheme itself was never completed. But to revert briefly to public affairs. " The Engagement11 as it is called, was a secret treaty between the Royalists of the two nations to assist in delivering the King from the thraldom of the English army and Parliament; and the proposal to send an army to succour Charles the First, in June 1648, was carried by a small majority in the Estates of Parliament. Such an enterprize placed this country in a false position. Hitherto the cause for which Scotland had been contending was to secure the purity and freedom of religious worship ; but by such interference the contest assumed a different character, and was in direct opposition to the spirit and tenor of the Solemn League. The expedition was strongly opposed by Argyle and others of the nobility and a great part of the nation, upon the ground either that it was a violation of the treaties with England, or that the King having refused to give an absolute assent to the Covenant, or to agree to the continuance of Presbytery in England for a longer period than three years, they could not support him on such terms. David Leslie and the most experienced officers likewise refused to act unless the Church were satisfied. The result of this unadvised and ill-conducted expedition into England2 in furtherance of this plan, was not only most calamitous in itself, but was followed by still more disastrous consequences. Instead of being of service to the royal cause, it may be said to have hastened the fate of the infatuated Monarch, who, in the policy which he so unhappily pursued, for supporting the ambition of the Prelates, and maintaining his own kingly supremacy, persevered in a course that deluged the country with blood, brought ruin upon the most 1 Bower's History of the University of Edinburgh, vol. i. pp. 218-246. See also Baillie, vol. ii. p. 464, vol. iii. p. 56. 2 See General Baillie's Vindication of his conduct at Preston, in vol. iii. p. 455. App.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. Ixi ancient and noble families in the land, and recklessly sacrificed the flower and gallant chivalry of England. The Scotish Presbyterians have most unjustly been accused as accessory to the death of Charles the First. Only one sentiment prevailed amongst them in abhorrence of his execution ; while the spirited remonstrances to the English Parliament by the Earl of Lothian, Cheislie, and Glendining, the Scotish commissioners then at London, ought to be a sufficient vindication from such an unfounded charge. It was in fact the inalienable attachment of the Presbyterians to a monarchical government, notwithstanding the hostile attitude which they were so long compelled to maintain, that proved so ruinous to the country. At the time of his father's execution, Prince Charles was in Holland. The Estates of Parliament, immediately upon hearing of this event, passed an Act on the 5th of February proclaiming him King; while in England, on the following day, the House of Commons declared the Monarchy and the House of Lords abolished, and a Council of State was appointed to assume the government of the nation. In pursuance of their act proclaiming him King, the Estates, on the 7th of that month, resolved to send a deputation to Holland to invite Charles to take possession of the throne of his ancestors ; but the Nation being still jealously watchful of their Covenants, it was likewise concluded, that full satisfaction should previously be demanded of him for the security of religion. The persons selected as commissioners were the Earl of Cassilis, George Wynram of Liberton, and Alexander Brodie of Brodie, (both of whom were soon afterwards raised to the bench as judges in the Supreme Court), accompanied by two ministers, Robert Baillie, and James Wood of St. Andrews. On their arrival at the Hague, having obtained an audience on the 27th of March, the Earl made a speech in the name of the Parliament and Kingdom of Scotland, and Baillie one in the name of the Church. As Bailee's letters from Holland, and his speech to the King, with the detailed report by the Commissioners of their proceedings, are all included in the present work, it is here only necessary to observe, that the satisfaction required was not given; and that they returned, commending indeed " the sweet and courteous disposition11 of their youthful monarch, but lamenting his being surrounded by " a very evill generation, both of English and Scots here, who vomite out all their evill humour against all our proceedings.11 Spang's letters to Baillie in Mareh 1649, which describe his interview withIxii MEMOIR OF THE LIFE William of Nassau, Prince of Orange, previously to the arrival of the Commissioners, are possessed of peculiar interest, and may excite regret that more of his correspondence has not been preserved. A pamphlet by Bishop Bramhall, called " A fair Warning to take heed of the Scotish Discipline," contributed so much to excite prejudice against the Presbyterians, that Baillie thought himself called upon while in Holland, to devote some leisure hours to prepare an answer. This he did at considerable length; and his work was printed at Delft, with a dedication to the Earl of Cassilis, a nobleman, as the author says, second to none in " sincere zeal to the truth of God, and affection to the liberties of the Church and Kingdoms of Scotland." It speedily drew from Richard Watson, an English chaplain at the Hague, a most bitter personal invective ; but this, we learn, was, for a time at least, " carefully suppressed, by the prudence and wisdom of a most noble Prince," evidently referring to William Prince of Orange; but after whose death, at the early age of 24, in November 1650, the copies that remained in the printer's hand were brought to light and partially circulated. The Commissioners having returned to Edinburgh in July 1649, and made reports of their proceedings both to Parliament and to the Assembly, " their carriage" was approved of, and hearty thanks given them " for their great pains and travells in that employment." Baillie declined being again employed as one of the deputation sent to treat with the King at Breda; and it would have been fortunate for this country had no further overtures been made, to induce him to visit Scotland in the following year. The subsequent public events, however, are well known, and need not be enlarged upon;—the arrival of Charles in Scotland in June 1650 ;—the victory of Cromwell at Dunbar on the 3d of September;—the coronation of Charles the Second, at Scone, on the 1st of January 1651;—the total rout of his forces at Worcester, in September following, which put an end to all his hopes, and forced him into an inactive and inglorious exile. About the same time, the surprise and capture of the leading nobles and members of the Committee of Estates, at Alyth, under General Monk's direction, while besieging Dundee,1 who shipped them off in a body to London, left Scotland defenceless, and in a short space led to such a complete change in l Monk's letter to Cromwell, 28th August 1651, and Col. Lidcott's to the Speaker, on the 30th of that month, describing their surprise, are printed in Cary's Memorials of the Civil War in England, vol. ii. pp. 345, 350. See also Nicol's Diary, pp. 56, 108, and Baillie, vol. iii. pp. 176, 179.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. Ixiii its affairs, that proclamation was made on the 6th of February 1652, that Scotland was henceforth to be governed according to the laws of England ; a strict military discipline being in fact established. During all these events Baillie was no unconcerned spectator; and on Cromwell's advance to Glasgow on the 13th of October 1650, when the magistrates and ministers had fled, and fearing that his share in inducing Charles to come to Scotland might be visited on him as an aggravated offence, he tells us, " I got to the Isle of Comray, with my Lady Montgo-merie, bot left all my family and goods to Cromwell's courtesie, which indeed was great; for he took such a course with his sojours that they did lesse displeasure at Glasgow nor if they had been at London, though Mr. Zacharie Boyd railled on them all to their very face in the High Church." Several changes took place about this time in the College, to which it is necessary to advert. Principal Strang, " by great stuilie and violence," had been forced to resign his office; and David Dickson, in February 1650, was translated to the University of Edinburgh, as Professor of Divinity. It was then proposed to elect Patrick Gillespie as Principal, and James Durham as Professor of Divinity, but whether in the place of Dickson or Baillie, is somewhat doubtful; Durham having actually received a call to a professorship before he was appointed by the Assembly, in July 1650, to attend Charles II. as his domestic chaplain, and Baillie apparently was not promoted to be first Professor of Divinity till the 17th of January 1651,1 the date of the following minute :— 1 In the Town-Council records, we find this entry, under the date 23d January 1651. " The said day, it being reported to the Provost that the Colledge hes tane course to declare Mr James Durhame's place in this Toune and Colledge vacant, and gone about to supplie his roume with ane other, without evin awneing the Toune therin; quhilk was verie havilie takine, and a lettre ordainit to be wryttin to Mr. James recenting it; and the Magistrates kc. to speik with the Colledge theranent." Looking at the dates, this might seem to have reference to Baillie's own appointment. We accidently learn, however, from a MS. note by him, on the 26th of January, that after his own promotion, Robert Ramsay had been chosen his colleague; which fact is further confirmed by his letter to Durham, (vol. iii. p. 150.) But this opposition of the Town Council no doubt prevented Ramsay's acceptance of the office at the time, and of course it was superseded, in the month of June that year, by his higher promotion as Principal of the University. Soon after Ramsay's appointment to the Principality, the following resolution was agreed to by the governors of the University, in order to relieve the Principal and Professors of Divinity henceforth from having any parochial charge, or exercising their ministerial functions further " than preaching of the Word, and administering of the Sacraments :"— " 27th Julij 1651. " The quhilk day, after incalling upone the name of God, the Moderators of the Universitie taking to their serious consideralionc, that, quhairas the office of Principall and Professours of Divinitie inIxiv MEMOIR OF THE LIFE " At the Oolledge of Glasgow, the seventeen day of Januarij 1651 zeirs. For so much as Mr. David Dicksone, late Professour of Theologie, is transported to the Oolledge of Edinburghe to exercise the said profession thair, it is aggreed and condescendit be G-eorge Lockhart, Rector of the Univer-sitie of Glasgow, Mr. Zacharie Boyd, Yice-Chancellour, Mr. Robert Ramsay,] Deane of Facultie, Maisters John Younge, William Strang, Richard Robertsone, and James Yeitch, Regents of the said Oolledge, with the speciall advice of the remanent assessours of the said Rector and Deane of Facultie, that Mr. Robert Baillie, Professour of Theologie in the said Oolledge, shall succeid to the place, stipend, and whole casualties quhilk the said Mr. David Dicksone had in the said Oolledge, be the aggreement maid with the said Mr. David at his entrie, and be the ordinance of the Yisitours of the said Oolledge appointed be the Parliament and Generall Assemblie; and namelie, that he shall have payed to him yearlie for his stipend, during his service of the said cuire in the said Oolledge, foure chalders victuall, and four hundreth pounds money of Scotland, furth of the parsonage tithes of the parochine of Kilbryde, and two hundreth pounds money foirsaid, furth of the rents of the Bishopricke of this Universitie is of so great weight, that the greatest pairts and most diligent labours of the ablest men ar hardlie sufficient thairfoire; and in bygane tymes, at the verie earnist desyre of some of the most able, pious, and wyse Principalis, of the Moderators, after much and long deliberatione, wer moved to liberat, for all tyme coming, the Principalis from the charge of the Ministerie, quhair-unto the necessities of the Colledge, for a long tyme had tyed thame: and that none of the Pro-fessours of Divinitie hitherto haue medled farther with the Ministerie then once a -week, quhen they were disposed to preach, without intangling thameselves at all with Visitationes or Discipline. Also if Principalis and Professors sould engage in the full ministrie, it might give to the Toune and their Paroches a hand in the electione and disposeing of the labours of the chiefe Maisters of the Colledge, which the good and priviledges of the Universitie doe not admitt: For these and other grave Reasons, they did unanimouslie agree that no Principall nor Professour sail engage in the Minis-trie, nor meddle with any pairt of the Ministeriall chairg, except in preaching of the Word, and administrating of the Sacraments, and that so far onlie as the Moderators, efter due consideratione, sail find consistent with the discharge of all their dueties in the Colledge, and, by particulare concession, sail allow to thame; which they declair sail not be refuised to any quho sail crave it, so far as hes bein granted to thair Professours hitherto Mr. David Dicksone and Mr. Ro. Baillie. It was also agreed, that it is free for the Colledge to choose any for the Principall and Professours of Divinities place quho is qualified, tho they be not ministers or preachers at all: And it is agreed lykewayis, that this Act suld be insert in the Universities Register, and subscryvet, to the end it ay be communicat and aggried unto by everie Principall and Professour of Divinitie heirefter, befoir their admissione. Geo : Lockhart, Rector. R. Baillie. Robert Ramsay, Principall. Hugo Blarus, Rect. Assess. George Young, Assess. Rect. Rich. Robertson. Jo. Young."OF ROBERT BAILLIE. Ixv Galloway, and benefices annexed thairto, quhilk are mortified to the said Colledge; and that at two termes in the yeare,—viz. the one equall half thairof at Candlemas, and the other equall half upone the first day of Julie nixt theirefter. Beginnand the first termes payment at Candlemes nixt in this instant yeare of God, Jm.vj°. and ffiftie one; and the nixt termes payment upon the first day of Julie nixt to cum in the said yeare, and that for his stipend in the said Colledge from the first day of Julie the yeare of God Jm- vj°- and fiftie, untill the first day of Julie the year of God Jm- vj°-fiftie one. In respect that his entrie to his Professione of Theologie in the said Colledge, was upon the first day of Julie in the yeare of God Jm.vj° and fourtie two, quhairin he has continued since syne ; and such like that he shall have for his dwelling dureing his said cuire the house belonging to the said Colledge, quhilk the said Mr. Dauid Dicksone laitlie possessed : But prejudice allwayes to the said Mr. Robert Baillie of anie farder augmentation of his stipend, granted or to be granted be the Commissioners of the Parliament or Generall Assemblie, hauing thair power to that effect. In witnes quhairof thir presents written be Mr. Thomas Smeton, pedell of the said Colledge, ar subscriuet as ffollowis :— R. Ramsay, Dean of Facultie. Geo. Lockhart, Rector. In a letter to Dickson, the 8th of March 1651, Baillie gives the following account of his occupations :—" On Monday I dyte [dictate] Theses of the Errors of the Time; on Tuesday and Friday I dyte long lessons in Chronologie ; on Thursday I have a long Hebrew lesson; Thursday before noon I wait on the Homilies, and will goe through the Directorie for preaching, prayer, sacraments, &c. Saturday is [for preparing my discourse] for Sunday. I have many letters for the publick to write every other day. I hardly enough hold up with all thir in so calamitous a time.11 The prelections on Hebrew which he delivered during the session of 1650, were printed three years later in a small volume for the use of his students; and in the view of urging a more diligent and accurate knowledge of that language, he refers to the success with which it was taught at Edinburgh by Dr. Conrad Otto, a learned Jew, who had been Geo. Young, Assessor. Hugo Blarus, Assessor. J. Vetche. Zachary Boyd, Vice-Chancellor. Jno. Young. Will. Strang. Rich. Robertson.11Ixvi MEMOIR OF THE LIFE invited to that University as teacher of the Oriental languages. He also commends the great erudition of Dr. Alexander Colville of St. Andrews, and the acquirements and zeal of their late principal Dr. Strang. In this enumeration it is singular he should have omitted the name of John Row, Principal of King's College Aberdeen, whose Hebrew Grammar was the earliest work of the kind that had appeared in Scotland; and who in 1651, had drawn up a Praxis of the rules or precepts of the Hebrew, which he inscribed in a joint dedication to Dickson and Baillie.1 On Durham's return to Glasgow, about March 1651, he urged his claims to be admitted to the place in the College to which he had been appointed during the previous year. Baillie opposed his admission, and, as he afterwards had occasion to regret, exerted himself but too successfully to induce him to relinquish the office ; " as we fear his deserting of the King will hurt his Majestie, and his coming hither increase our divisions.11 Durham finally accepted a call to be minister of the Inner High Church, vacated by Robert Ramsay, on his election as Principal, chiefly by Baillie's influence, on finding that his old master, Robert Blair, would not accept an invitation to that office. In his letter to Spang, 19th of July 1654, Baillie says, " I wes, both before and after [Ramsay's appointment], much dealt with by these whom it concerned, to accept that place; but I ever peremp-torilie refuised: I knew it belonged to Dr. Strang. . . I loved no changes, especially to a place of civile action ; however God guided my mind to be resolute not to meddle with it.11 But Ramsay died on the 4th of September 1651, within little more than two months of his admission ; and the office remaining vacant till 1653, the subsequent appointments by the English party, of Patrick Gillespie as Principal, and John Young as second Professor of Divinity, were sources to Baillie of much vexation and trouble. When we reflect on his long connexion with tho University, his great zeal 1 This little work was probably never printed. I lately procured a MS. copy of it, carefully transcribed by the Author himself in the year 1668, "in usum M. G. M." The following is the dedication referred to:— " Mr0. Davidi Dicksono et Mro. Roberto Ballio, viris plurimum colendis, Edinburgi et Glasguae respective SS® Theologise Professoribus, Mr. Joan. Row S. P. D. " Vos, Fratres Reverendi in D[omino] dilectissimi, ad hoc me seriis in[cita]stis Uteris; effla-gitationi vestrae cessi. Siquid penes me sit quo OPUS DEI promoveatur, vobis viris tantis et talibus mihi religio erit denegare. " Quare Praxin hanc Praeceptorum Hebraeae Grammaticse, munusculum levidense, crasso filo, quale quale est, vobis mihi charissirnis D. D. Q. Si hinc sit Deo gloria, si Theologiae studiosis proventus, ut ad arcana Sacrse paginae adyta facilior pateat aditus, quod in votis habui, habeo. Valete. Datum Abredaea, an. Christogonias 1651."OF ROBERT BAILLIE. Ixvii for the improvement of education, his own peculiar qualifications by his learning and acquirements, with his unwearied attention to the interests of the College, and the esteem and respect in which he was so generally held, it is matter of regret that his election to the Principality had not taken place at this time, instead of being deferred to the closing period of his life. He had also often " a weary heart these tymes bygone, for many a crosse accident both private and public.11 " After a long decaying and sickness, my most gracious and virtuous companion was removed, June 7th 1653. . . . Since, the Lord hes guided my family and six children weel as I could have expected or wished.11 About the same time he published two or three small treatises; and was employed in enlarging his work on Scripture Chronology. But jt is again necessary to revert to political events, in order to point out the origin of those unhappy disputes which prevailed in the Church, and which occupy such a conspicuous place in the later portion of Baillie's correspondence. When Parliament met in January 1649, in order to manifest their renewed adherance to their covenanted principles, an act was passed on the 23d, called " The Act of Classes,11 from its dividing into four separate classes, according to their degrees of malignancy, the persons connected with the " late unlawfull Engagement,11 and opposed to the Covenant, who should not be entrusted with power. When Charles the Second found no other means left for attaining possession of the throne, he at length gave an insincere consent to the several demands of the Scotish Commissioners at Breda; and he arrived in this country, in June 1650, to occasion still greater dissensions. His personal conduct and manners were but little suited to the strict and severe habits of the people with whom he had to associate ; but being desirous to satisfy the Church, for the bfetter advancing of his own ends, he came under the most solemn engagements and formally renounced popery and prelacy, and declared he " would have no enemies but the enemies of the Covenant.11 Similar oaths and protestations were again taken at his Coronation in his public and solemn renewal of the Covenant. After the defeat at Dunbar, and Cromwell's continued successes, the state of the country had suggested the necessity of reinforcing the army by the admission on certain terms of persons who had been incapacitated by the Act of Classes. Such a proposal, however, was strongly opposed, and gave rise to the " Western Remonstrance,11 which condemned any approach to a junction with the Malignant VOL. I. kIxviii MEMOIR OF THE LIFE party. When the Commission of the Assembly met at Perth, on the 14th December 1650, the following Query by the Parliament as to the admission of Malignants into the army was propounded, viz.:—" What persons are to be admitted to ryse in armes, and joyne with the forces of the kingdome, and in what capacitie, for defence thereof, against the armie of Sectaries, who (contrary to the Solemn League and Covenant, and Treaties,) have most unjustly invaded, and are destroying the king-dome V The answer was favourable, for the employment of those persons who had been incapacitated by the Act of Classes, but were able to aid in defence of the country, with the exception of such as were excommunicated and forfeited, or professed enemies to the Covenant and cause of God. This was the first Resolution. It was followed by a second Query, relating to admission to offices of the State and Judicatories, g,s proposed by the King to the Parliament, and transmitted to the Commission on the 19th of March 1651, viz. " Whether or not it be sinfull and unlawfull, for the more effectuall prosecution of the Publick Resolutions, for the defence of the cause, of the King, and Kingdome, to admit such persons to be members of the Committee of Estates, who are now debarred from the publick trust, they being such as have satisfied the Kirk for the offences for which they were excluded, and are since admitted to enter into Covenant with us V The obvious import of this question was to obtain an answer, however qualified, that should serve as an excuse for rescinding the Act of Classes, and thus secure, by their outward formal professions of repentance, the admission of such a number of the malignant party into power as might be sufficient to control the management of public affairs. The answer given to this Query formed the second Resolution, and was of an undecided and compromising character. Douglas, Baillie, and their friends, although opposed to the Engagement", were of opinion, that the laws in regard to such persons were too stringent, and ought to be relaxed; and the Estates of Parliament, acting upon their advice, on the 2d of June repealed the Act of Classes, having previously, as it was declared, by their act on the last of May, " provyded for the security of religion, work of reformation, and persons who have been sted-fast in the Covenant.1' But these Resolutions were vehemently opposed by an encreasing party, of whom the most active were James Guthrie and Patrick Gillespie in the Church, and Argyle, Warriston, and Cheisly, in the State. In July 1651, a meeting of Assembly took place at St. An-OF ROBERT BAILLIE. Ixix drews, whence it was transferred to Dundee; and it was intimated that all who were not satisfied with these Public Resolutions should be cited, as liable to censure. This, it is alleged, was virtually prejudging the questions in dispute; and it gave occasion for those who were opposed to the Resolutions, to protest not only against inflicting such censure, but boldly to deny the lawfulness, constitution, and proceedings of the Assembly itself. The Assembly however disregarded such protestations, and passed a sentence of deposition against Guthrie and other two of the leading protesters. Such was the origin of those disputes that rent the Church by a spirit of division during so many years, and hence the names of the two contending parties ; Douglas, Baillie, Dickson, and the more moderate of the Clergy being known as Resolutioners; the others, or the minority, as Remonstrants or Protesters. Even at this distance of time, it is not easy to form a dispassionate judgment of the matters in dispute, or at least few persons will be found to give an unqualified approbation of the conduct of either party. That in the first instance the Resolutioners acted too much on the false principle of expediency, is so very evident, that it cannot be denied. They were so greatly alarmed with the dangers threatened by the sectarian forces that had invaded their country, and they were so blinded in their attachment to the King, that they failed to perceive the still greater evils and dangers that would result either from disunion among themselves, or from co-operation with persons who were opposed to the religious principles for which they were contending. On the other hand, the Protesters must be considered as having originated this disunion by their proceedings after the defeat at Dunbar, in forming a party and raising forces in the West, and by their refusing to act along with David Leslie against the common enemy, while their Remonstrance only increased the necessity of having recourse to an alliance with those known as malig-nants. If therefore they can be said to have adhered more rigidly to the letter of their Covenant-engagements, they evinced an uncalled for degree of puritanical strictness, under circumstances of very peculiar exigency, and manifested a strong desire to usurp a tyrannical authority over their brethren. It was now that the loss of such a man as Alexander Henderson was felt,—one who by signal prudence, judgment, and decision, might have healed such divisions. Durham and Blair were solicitous to accomplish this, but without effect, notwithstanding their personal influence.Ixx MEMOIR OF THE LIFE From what Baillie states cf his own conduct at this time, it is impossible to vindicate him, in his anxious endeavours to defeat the overtures proposed for reconciling the two parties, by preventing the proposed conference for that purpose. But all his anxieties and managing interference might have been spared, as from the overbearing tone and manner assumed by the Protesters, it was clear that no kind of agreement was practicable, unless accompanied with the abject humiliation of one party. Had the Protesters displayed any thing approaching to a mild and conciliatory spirit, opportunities would not have been wanting to have accomplished such a union. The original cause of contention had been removed by the utter extinction of a malignant party in the State, under the strict military discipline exercised by the English Sectaries; and men who professed the same doctrines, and who were actuated by the same fidelity and zeal in the discharge of their ministerial duties, ought to have exhibited greater Christian forbearance towards each other. But the assumption of political power by the Church, was doubtless the actual cause of all their contentions ; and the same desires still remaining in force, were the true obstacles to their reunion. This was the more to be lamented, as the Church had then attained the position and influence for which her best friends had so faithfully and nobly contended. Unfettered by patronage or the interference of civil authority in ecclesiastical matters, supported and encouraged by the State, which had passed such acts as might contribute to the advancement of religion, freed from error and heretical doctrines, the parishes in general filled with zealous and faithful ministers, parochial schools established in all parts, under the superintendance of presbyteries, combining religious instruction with useful learning, and the very name of schism or dissent being unknown, all ranks professing their sincere attachment to the presbyterian forms of worship; it might have been expected that the Church, with enlarged views, would have pursued her career in a sphere of increasing usefulness, and proved still more eminently, than under persecutions and manifold difficulties, that she has ever been a blessing to the land. It was the evident policy of Cromwell, while every thing else underwent a change, to leave the Church very much to its own guidance. The General Assembly which met at Edinburgh on the 20th of July 1653, was indee4 peremptorily dismissed at the time of meeting by a military force ; and no subsequent permission was granted for holding any other Assembly.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. Ixxi In other respects, the ordinary meetings of Presbyteries and Synods were allowed to be held unmolested. The College of Justice had been superseded, and the administration of Justice in Civil affairs entrusted to Commissioners, who presided weekly in rotation. To some of their number others were added as a Committee for the Visitation of Universities, and for filling up vacancies in parishes. The several places of strength throughout the country were garrisoned with English troops; and the whole kingdom was laid prostrate at the feet of Cromwell. Baillie pathetically laments the state to which the country had been reduced ; most of the nobility dead, imprisoned, or in exile; their estates forfeited or overburdened with debt; the civil judicatories in the hands of English soldiers ; the garrisons filled with their troops; the clergy divided among themselves to the manifest prejudice of the interests of religion; and the people groaning under a heavy taxation. Notwithstanding all this, it must be admitted that affairs in general were then conducted with great impartiality and success; that a stop was put to lawless depredations; and that the country itself began to prosper under its new rulers. There are few events in Baillie's life, at this period, that call for special notice. It has already been stated that Patrick Gillespie was promoted to the office of Principal of the University of Glasgow. To his admission Baillie was decidedly opposed, and protested against it, not only because his appointment had been informal, but likewise because he was a person who lay under the censure of the Church, and who in point of learning was not possessed of the qualifications necessary for the office. In other matters connected with the internal administration of the College he was also far from being satisfied; and in order to secure his own tranquillity, he purposely avoided taking any share in their proceedings. He also tells us, that by absenting himself for three years from the meetings of Presbytery or Synod, he had enjoyed more peace than he was wont to have. On the 1st of October 1656, he consulted his own domestic happiness in his marriage with Helen Strang,1 widow of Robert Wilkie, one of the ministers of Glasgow, and daughter of Principal Strang. His eldest daughter, by his first marriage, Lilias—whom he mentions in his earlier letters, as his " little Lillie11—was married about the same time " to a very good young man," William Eccles, younger of Kildonan, who entered 1 The Town-Council of Glasgow, on the 10th of March 1658, " appoynts ane seat to be macle in the Laich Kirk, for Mr. Robert Baillie and his wyfe."lxxii MEMOIR OF THE LIFE the ministry, and became minister of Ayr. JBut he had occasion to lament the bereavement of his eldest son, Robert, when about 22 years of age, and after he completed his education at the University. He is described as a youth of very sweet and amiable disposition. " The rest of my children (he says) thrive, and are well; and these are spurs in my side to mind God's service.11 Although Scotland remained during the Commonwealth in a state of comparative tranquillity, the contest of the two great parties in the Church still continued, widening more and more, and extending to all inferior ecclesiastical judicatories. It was now a struggle which party, by undermining the other, should obtain the mastery, and secure the greatest share of political influence and power. The Protesters were more especially favoured by Cromwell, as several of them had accepted the Tender acknowledging his authority and that of the Commonwealth, while many of their opponents, including Baillie, still continued publicly to pray for the King. The more effectually to secure this superiority, Patrick Gillespie and two of his friends resolved to proceed to London, and exert their personal influence with the Protector, to obtain power for an equal number on both sides to erect themselves into a Committee for visiting, purging, and planting Churches throughout the land. The Resolutioners adopted a similar course, and in August 1656, they employed James Sharp, minister of Crail, who now appears more conspicuously on the stage, as the confidential agent and representative of the Church. His Instructions, printed in the Appendix to this work, are worthy of attention. It is admitted on all hands that he displayed no common sagacity and skill in thwarting the views of the Protesters ; against whom he afterwards manifested the most implacable hatred. The letters of this period, preserved by Baillie, are sufficient to explain the course pursued by both parties, and to shew the deep interest he felt individually in supporting the Resolutioners, and encouraging such of his friends as took a more active share in these disputes. It is however always to be kept in view that he displays very strong prejudices, and that in all his statements he is too much disposed to represent the sentiments and conduct of the Protesters in the least favourable point of view. It is indeed painful to reflect how completely these unhappy dissen- 2 See conclusion of letter to Spang, in June 1658, vol. iii, p. 372__At page 286, Baillie takes notice of his son's desire to be appointed " Bibliothecar" to the College in 1655 ; and the unfair methods taken to intrude another person in his stead, after he had received the presentation.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. lxxiii sions estranged the oldest and most intimate friends. In their incessant desires for obtaining from the English the power " to purge and plant11 the " corrupt11 Church at their own discretion, as the godly party, Baillie accuses his opponents of a readiness to yield too much to the civil power, and thus to introduce a kind of Erastianism. But the indifference of the English themselves, joined to their avowed sentiments of toleration, saved the Protesters from any such gross dereliction of their professed principles ; while their party continued to receive fresh accessions in most of the young men who entered into the office of the ministry at this time.1 The Restoration of Charles the Second, 30th May 1660, was the event hailed by Baillie and his friends as promising to rescue their beloved Church from its thraldom. In such expectations they were misled by various causes. By the representations of Sharp, who accompanied Monk to London, and from thence to Holland, to invite Charles to the British^throne, they were artfully persuaded that it was as unnecessary to insist for any guarantee or stipulations from his Majesty for their security, as it would be useless to trouble him with petitions or addresses. The King's known aversion to the Protesting party had no little influence in strengthening such persuasions ; they had also Monk's professions that " Scotland hath been always dear to me,11 and " as for Presbytery, what I declare to the world, (which was both my conscience and reason,) I adjudge it to be the best expedient to heal the bleeding divisions of these poore nations and agaiD " that the welfare of your Church shall be a great part of my care? They likewise relied on the hearty concurrence of Lauderdale, Glencairne, and other courtiers. But above all, on receiving the letter addressed by Charles to the Presbytery of Edinburgh, to be communicated to other Presbyteries, dated the 10th of August, they trusted to his Majesty's pro-mise that a free General Assembly would be called, and the Church secured in its former privileges; as it was accompanied with this express assurance, We doe also resolve to protect and preserve the Government of the Church op Scotland, as it is settled by law, [viz. in 1649,] without violation. No wonder such assurances completely deceived them, and made the Presbyterians continue in their false 1 On the subject of these disputes, from 1649 to 1660, the reader will find much valuable information in a little work recently published by the Rev. James Beattie, the " History of the Church of Scotland during the Commonwealth." Edinb. 1842, 12mo.lxxiv MEMOIR OF THE LIFE security. In a letter to James Wood, dated from London the 29th of May 1660, Sharp mentions his gracious reception at Breda, where he " came very seasonably,11 and his having " an opportunity to give a full account of all the late transactions, and of the condition of our church and nation. He was pleased to admit me five or six times to private conferences, in which he did express a great affection to Scotland, and a resolution to restore us to our former liberties. I wondered to hear him speak of all the passages as to persons and things while he was in Scotland, with as full a remembrance and exact knowledge as if they had been recently acted, and he had lately come thence. . . . However he may be influenced as to the settling of Religion in England, (which I fear, through the prejudice of this people against that uniformity which was Covenanted for, will not be such as we wish,) yet what the Lord hath wrought in Scotland will be 'preserved and not altered by his Majestie? In writing to Lauderdale, on the 12th of September, Sharp says, among other effects produced by the King's letter, " the pulpits (were) sounding with thanksgivings and rejoycings to find our lawful King declaring his Resolution to preserve and countenance the government of this Church.'1'' He then alludes " to that calumnie spread by Mrs. Grillespy, upon her returne, of your Lordship, and believed in the West, and by Mr. Blair in Fife, that you had turned a fixed friend to the EpisGopale party in England, and they had all assurances from you, and confidence in you, that you would set up Prelacy in this Kirl. I have asserted, it was a malicious lye : and, as Mr. Blair is now turned to be a great royalist, so he doth disbelieve the report.111 The clergy in Scotland were well aware of the aversion to Presbytery entertained by the chief advisers at Court, but they* knew little of the King's true character, nurtured and brought up in the arts of dissimulation, and solicitous only for enjoying his own absolute authority, and the indulgence of his selfish and licentious inclinations. When Sharp set out for London at the end of April 1661, he had assured Baillie it was not " in order to a change in the Church? So reluctant indeed was he to listen to the reports which began to prevail in regard to Sharp's deceitful conduct, that so late as the 29th of August, he says to him, you shall deceive us notablie, and doe us a very evident evill turne before I believe it,11 But he deceived others much less credulous than " worthy Mr. Baily,11 in 1 Letters from Archbishop Sharp to the Duke of Lauderdale, transcribed from originals in the possession of Dawson Turner, Esq. for the Bannatyne Club.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. Ixxv a most notable manner, at a period which exhibited, in so many lamentable instances, the fruits of political subserviency and insincere professions. Had the Church not been rent asunder by two contending parties, it is more than probable that any plan for overturning the whole platform of Presbytery would have never been adopted. It appears evident that Charles entertained no such design for several months after the Restoration ; and we may conclude that Lauderdale, as Secretary of State for Scotland, yielded with great reluctance to the proposed change ; although, to his indelible shame, he was at length brought to sacrifice all his old principles and solemn professions at the shrine of worldly ambition.1 In a letter to Robert Douglas, dated at Whitehall on the 23d of October 1660, he writes as follows: " As to the concerns of our Mother Kirk, I can onely promise my faithfull indeavours in what may be for her good ; and indeed it is no small comfort to me, in serving my master, to finde That his Majestie is so fixt in his resolution, not to alter any thing in the Government of that Church ; of this you may be confident, though I date not answer, but some would be willing enough to have it otherwise: I dare not doubt of the honest Ministers continuing in giving constant testimonies of their duety to the King, (and your letter eonfirmes me in these hopes,) and they doing their duety, i dare answer for the King, having of late had full contentment in discoursing with his Majestie on that subject. His Majestie hath told me that he intends to call a Generall Assembly, and I have drawen a proclamation for that purpose, but the day is not yet resolved on. The proclamation shall, I thinke, come down with my Lord Treasurer, who sayes he will take 1 Baillie dedicated to the Earl of Lauderdale, in 1645 and 1647, the two parts of his Dissuasive; and in a letter addressed to his Lordship, under an assumed name, (vol. iii. p. 23), he says, in a jocular manner, " When I come to paint you the third time, I shall put a ray on your brow longer than any of Moyses horns." In the same letter he speaks of sending him a small Hebrew Bible, and refers to a bargain for a copy of the works of St. Chrysostom. It may therefore not be out of place to remark, that his Lordship appears to have been possessed of more than ordinary learning. In 1677, David Fergusson published an " Analysis critico-practica Cantici Canticorum," with the Hebrew text, and explanations of every word, which he dedicated to John then Duke of Lauderdale, and adds to his several titles, " In 'EyzvxXazraiVtia, pracipve vero in Lingua Hebrcea versatissimo." During his long confinement in England, Lauderdale employed some of his leisure hours in literary pursuits, and translated into English a work by Moyses Amyraud, a celebrated French divine, which is entitled " A Treatise concerning Religion, in refutation of the opinion which accounts all indiffer* ent." Lond. 1660, 12mo, pp. [xxiv] and 539. No indication of the translator is given in the book itself, his Lordship having more important secular matters to look after; but it is ascribcd to him in a work called " Account of Scots Divines," by Laurence Charteris, Professor of Divinity at Edinburgh, who died in the year 1701. VOL. I. Ilxxvi MEMOIR OF THE LIFE journey this week." With all his faults, Lauderdale can never be accuscd of hypocritical duplicity1; and, it is but charitable to believe, that till this period, at least, he was quite sincere in his professions of attachment to the Church. Whether the change that took place might not in a great measure be attributed to the designing conduct of Sharp, it would be out of place here to inquire: but Baillie's letters of remonstrance, addressed to Lauderdale and Sharp, in the year 1660 and 1661, at the very time he was acknowledging obligations to them for his advancement in the College, will always vindicate his memory from any charge of timidity or of a time-serving and wavering disposition, by bearing witness to his open, manly and pointed reproofs and warnings against their apprehended apostacy. This brings us to the closing period of Baillie's life. Patrick Gillespie was deprived of his office as Principal of the University, for having unjustly intruded himself, in the' times of the late Usurpation; and Baillie was promoted to it on the 23d of January 1661.2 For this preferment he was indebted chiefly to the friendship of Lauderdale. Although not anxious for this office, which he tells us, he might have had many years before, he distinctly says to Sharp, " that since Dr. Strang's death, the first place in our House is no lesse than my due and just deserving, and whoever meddles with it, without my consent, is injurious."11 He then refers to the exertions made to procure the place to his colleague John Young, and adds, " I could ever have lived rather with Mr. Gillespie than with him; and if he should be the man, I think I would leave the House, and go to a country church. From time to time I have had ingratitudes and displeasures from him that hardlie I can bear long.1' In Sharp's unpublished correspondence, occur one or two passages relating to this appointment. On the 17th of September 1660, in a letter to Lauderdale, he says,—" Mr. Baily, I hear, hath wreat to your Lordship, he cannot be induced to embrace that Principal's place. The most even of his friends, and those in Glasgow, think it would requyr a man of a more active and 1 The subject has been carefully investigated by the industrious historian Wodrow, in the introduction to his History, where it is elucidated by a series of extracts from Sharp's own letters. The additional letters that hava been discovered since Wodrow's time, tend only to confirm the fact that Sharp all along had been acting most treacherously towards those by whom he was confidentially employed. 2 This is the date of the Royal Warrant for his presentation, (vol. iii, p. 422,) a delay of four months having occurred from his actual nomination to the office, (ib. p. 411.) The usual Oath, which Baillie must have taken at his admission as Principal, is not contained in the Records of the University.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. lxxvii resolut temper, by whose authority the ministry of the West, for the most part corrupted, might be reduced and kept in order." On the 12th of the following month, also from Edinburgh, he writes,—" This other inclosit is from honest Mr. Baily, who I sent for to give me a meeting heer: it will give your Lordship the account of his own mind and desires. I find he is not unpersuadable ; but some are of the opinion that the West-countrey requyres a person of more acrimony and weight than they suppose to be in him : they speak of Mr. Will. Colvin ; but Mr. Douglas and I think it were hard to give occasion of grief to so good a man; and therefor, if the presentation wer sent down with a blank for the person, Mr. Baily might be induced to have it filled up with his own name, or, without any grudging, he might consent to Mr. William Colvin: but this I leave intirely to your Lordship's disposall." And again, on the 5th of February 1661, he adds,—" I shall immediatly send an express to Mr. Baily, who must own an infinit obligation to this speciall act of favour to himself1 which speaks also to others, that your noble friendship, wher it is once given, is worthy to be trusted to and dependit upon. You have redeemed that honest worthy man [from] the height of injustice and contempt designed against him." If these passages are compared with those addressed to Baillie himself, it may possibly be thought the gratitude expressed for Sharp's services in this matter, ^Vas fully commensurate to the obligations conferred. Baillie was not privileged to enjoy much peace or satisfaction in this new office. His predecessor had involved the College funds to a considerable extent, by " his vain gloriositie" in enlarging the building, by his encreasing the number of bursers, and also by claiming large sums as due to himself. Being of a restless, active, persevering spirit, it was not lively he would patiently suffer the affront of being ejected; and in various ways, he occasioned Baillie no small annoyance, insomuch that it " does oft take my meat and sleep from me." It has been alleged that Gillespie, to secure his place and emoluments, had expressed his willingness to lend his aid in establishing Episcopacy. In the mean while Baillie set himself very industriously to bring the affairs of the University to a better state, and solicited Lauderdale, with much pertinacity, to assist in relieving the College from its manifold burdens, by obtaining a grant from the King for that purpose. But although the buildings were left unfinished,—the place burdened with debt,—with scarcely sufficient available 1 The words in italics 3r6 underlined in the original.Jxxviii MEMOIR OF THE LIFE means to support the establishment, these might in time have been remedied ; but he himself had fallen into a feeble and declining state of health, from which he never recovered. Much of this bodily weakness he attributes to the changes that seemed inevitable. All that he and his friends had been contending for during a period of twenty-four years, was threatened to be overturned : this prospect pressed heavily on his mind, and affected him in a similar manner with Henderson, at the close of his life ; for, he repeatedly says, these changes were " hastening him, to his grave;" and in the last letter he wrote, he is forced reluctantly to confess that Sharp, in his character of agent for the Church, " piece by piece, in so cunning a way, has trepanned usT Parliament assembled on the 1st of January 1661. On the 9th of February, the whole Parliamentary proceedings in the year 1649, by which Presbytery had been established on its surest foundation, were declared illegal; and still more effectually to accomplish the proposed revolution in the Church, a few weeks later, the Act Rescissory was passed, repealing in a similar manner the whole acts and proceedings of the preceding Parliaments from 1640 to 1648, thus, by one resolution, " pulling downe all our Laws at once, which concerned our Church since 1633." " My Lord," says Baillie to Lauderdale, shortly after the passing of this extreme measure, " My Lord, ye are the Nobleman of the world I esteem most and love best: I think I may say and write to you what I like. If you have gone with your heart to forsake your Covenant, to countenance the introduction of Bishops and Books, and strengthening the King by your advyce in these things, i think you a prime transgressor, and lyable among the first to answer to God for that great sin, and opening a door, which in haste will not be closed, for persecution of a multitude of the best persons and most loyall subjects that are in all the three Dominions ... I will continue to pray for you, doe what you will." In the new state of affairs, the first step was to gratify Sharp's ambition, by his promotion to the Archiepiscopal See of St. Andrews. At the same time, Andrew Fairfoull, minister of Dunse, was preferred tq^ the See of Glasgow; Robert Leighton, Principal of the University of Edinburgh, became Bishop of Dunkeld, and James Hamilton, minister of Cambus-nethan, Bishop of Galloway. These four were consecrated at London on the 15th of December; but previous to this solemnity they slavishly submitted to be re-ordained presbyters, although, under similar circum-OF ROBERT BAILLIE. lxxix stances, iri the year 1610, the validity of presbyterian ordination was sustained and acknowledged by the English prelates, at the consecration of Spottiswood and two other ministers from Scotland. On the 19th of April 1662, Fairfoull made his public entry into Glasgow,1 accompanied by the Earl of Glenoairne, Lord Chancellor, and by several of the nobility, and a great number of gentlemen from the neighbouring country. He was received with all due solemnity by the citizens and magistrates; and Baillie says " he preached on the Sunday soberly and well.'" He further tells us that " some of my neighbours were earnest that the Chancellor and he should have a collation in the Colledge on Monday morning. Against this I reasoned much; but was over-voted, to our great and needlesse charge: two hundred pound payed not our charge." Baillie, who was confined by indisposition, likewise informs us that John Young, Professor of Divinity, "made to the Bishop a speech of welcome, beside my knowledge. The Chancellor, my noble kind schollar, brought all in to see me in my chamber, where I gave them sack and ale the best of the town. The Bishop was very courteous to me : I excused my not using of his styles, and professed my utter difference from his way." According to one authority,2 Baillie at a former period of his life had received an offer of a Bishopric, which he absolutelyirefused, and when he was visited, during his last sickness, by the new Archbishop, is reported to have spoken as follows:—" Mr. Andrew, I will not call you my Lord; King Charles would have made me one of these Lords ; but I do not find in the New Testament, that Christ has any Lords in his house.11 If any proof however were required of his consistent opposition to prelacy, it is furnished by Wodrow the historian. His father, James Wodrow, a man of great modesty and learning, and Professor of Divinity in the University of Glasgow, after the Revolution, had been educated under Baillie, from whom he received much encouragement and kindness, and he " retained to his dying day the highest value for his memory.11 When leaving the College for the summer vacation, Wodrow being desirous to study the controversy between the Resolutioners and 1 In the Kingdom's Intelligencer, No. 18, may be seen a full account of the Archbishop's progress from Edinburgh on the 18th of April 1662, of his entry into Glasgow on the 19th, and the proceedings of the two following days. (Chalmers's Caledonia, vol. iii. p. 630.) But the Archbishop did not long enjoy his dignified situation, having died at Edinburgh, in November following. 2 Notice of Baillie's Life, prefixed to the transcript of his Letters and Journals belonging to the Church of Scotland, and inserted in the printed copy, Edinb. 1775, vol. i. p. vi.Ixxx MEMOIR OF THE LIFE Protesters, requested his master's advice what books he should read on that subject. Baillie said to him, " Jacobe, I am too much engaged personally in that debate to give you either my judgement on the whole, or to direct you to particular authors on the one side and the other.11 But taking him into his closet, he gave him the whole pamphlets that had passed on both sides, in print and manuscript, arranged in their proper order, and said, " There is the whole that 1 know in that affair ; take these home to the country with you, and read them carefully ; and look to the Lord for his guiding you to determine yourself aright upon the whole.1' On a later occasion, Wodrow visiting the Principal about a month or six weeks before his death, after some other conversation, said, " Now, Sir, Prelacy seems to be hastening upon us in this Church, and I do not know what changes may be before I see you againand therefore begged his opinion and advice in that matter; (and it was the last time ever he saw him.) Mr. Baillie answered, " Jacobe, I will not deal with you in this as I remember I did in the debate 'twixt Resolutioners and Protesters, but will tell you my opinion most sincerely in that matter. I have now for upwards of twenty years observed affairs in the Church of Scotland narrowly. I have had occasion particularly to dip into that controversy, and consider it exactly, and to know the spring of affairs since the last change in Church and State; and after my utmost pondering and trial, I am persuaded that Prelacy is disagreeable to the word of- God, contrary to the practice of the primitive and purest times of Christianity, and contrary to the real interests of these Nations; and though it be coming in, it will be but like a land-flood.11 My father added, when he told me this, " Yet it was a flood of twenty-eight years continuance.111 In Baillie's latest letter, which was addressed to Spang in May 1662, or within three months of his death, he describes his general weakness, and the nature of the complaints that had confined him to his chamber for six weeks; and it forms an appropriate termination of his correspondence. One of his special desires, he says, was to see completed a work in Latin, being his lectures on Scripture History and Chronology, delivered in the College during the year 1650 and subsequent sessions, which he had greatly enlarged, and sent over to Holland to be printed, under Spang's superintendence ; and he entreats his cousin to hasten its publication, that it l Life of James Wodrow, A. M. Professor of Divinity, written by his Son, Robert Wodrow, A. M. pp. 29, 31, Edinb. 1828, 12mo—Wodrow's History, vol. i. p. 128, fol. edit.; vol. i. p. 288, 6vo. edit.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. lxxxi might not be a posthumous work.1 He purposed to have dedicated it to the Earl of Lauderdale, as a renewed mark of friendship and gratitude ; but no notice being taken of his request, he was forced to conclude, that such an address at that peculiar time would not prove acceptable. In the same letter he has briefly alluded to the posture of public affairs, and the state of the Church. By the Rescissory Act, which was passed on the 28th of March 1661, it was declared, that the settling of church-government belonged to his Majesty. As his previous declaration, in August 1660, contained an express assurance, that the Church should be preserved as by law established, recourse was had .to this miserable evasion, that the laws by which Presbytery had been established were now annulled ; and that his Majesty was pleased, by an Act of Privy Council, on the 6th of September 1661, to interpose " his Royal authority for restoring of this Church to its right government by Bishops, as it was by law before the late troubles, and as it now stands settled by law.11 Baillie alluding to this change, says, " The guyse now is, the Bishops will trouble no man, but the State will punish seditious ministers. We are in the most hard talcing we have seen at any timer The State indeed began to interpose its authority, by imposing fines, by imprisonments, and by ejecting from office many of those who had been most active and zealous, both in civil and ecclesiastical affairs, under the Protector. But examples of severer punishment were also required, in order to satisfy the thirst for revenge for all the hardships, restrictions, and sufferings the- Royalists had undergone. The Earl of Middleton, Lord Commissioner, had not forgotten his excommunication, and James Guthrie, minister of Stirling, by whom it was intimated, became his victim. The blood and disgraceful execution of Montrose seemed to demand expiation, and no other would serve this purpose than his great and able rival the Marquis of Argyle, although not chargeable with half the compliances under the Commonwealth, with General Monk, who was created Duke of Albemarle, and who with peculiar baseness transmitted some of Argyle's private letters to insure his condemnation. Not satisfied with the forfeiture of Johnstone of Warriston, who might well have been suffered to drag out in exile a few years, in a state of mind and body greatly enfeebled, he was 1 Wodrow relates that. *• Mr. John Young had compendized his Chronology, (I think before it was printed), and was designing to have published it, till Mr. Bailey threatened to disgrace him."—. (Analecta, vol. i. p. 16G.)lxxxii MEMOIR OF THE LIFE hunted out, and brought back to Edinburgh to undergo an ignominious death. The monument erected to Henderson's memory in the Greyfriars Churchyard, was ordered by Parliament to be defaced, but, as the inscription on it truly affirms, Ipse sibi monwmentum in animis bonorum r&-liquit. The Solemn League and Covenants were abjured, and treated with ignominy in both kingdoms, being publicly burnt by the hangman ; and the oaths by which they were imposed, declared to be unlawful, as if such acts of indignity or any public ordinance could supersede their continued obligation with persons who had solemnly and conscientiously sworn to their observance. Lay-patronage was again restored, and it was enacted, that no minister, admitted subsequently to the year 1649, should possess any legal right to his stipend, unless he applied for, and obtained a new presentation from the lawful patron, and collation from the Bishop of the Diocese. Few persons however came forward to make such a degrading application; and recourse being had to the Privy Council to enforce the rule, an order was passed at Glasgow on the 1st of October 1662, declaring every such parish vacant, and enjoining all recusant ministers, with their families, to remove beyond the bounds of their respective presbyteries, before the 1st day of November next, who refused compliance with the terms of the Act. This iniquitous proceeding was concluded at the instance of the Archbishop of Glasgow, who assured Middleton there would not be ten in his Diocese, (the great stronghold of the Protesters), who, under the dread of such a penalty, would hesitate to comply. The result was indeed little anticipated. It was imagined that most of the leading Protesters having been silenced or removed, no serious opposition would be made, either by the clergy or people generally, to the new modelling of the Church. But it has been computed, that nearly four hundred ministers, or about one-half of all the incumbents in Scotland at that time, voluntarily sacrificed every worldly prospect and comfort, subjecting themselves and their families to unexpected want, by resigning their benefices rather than forsake their covenanted principles, by any act acknowledging and submitting to the usurpation of Bishops.1 1 Of the ministers who thus manifested the sincerity of their professions, it must be acknowledged that by far the greater number belonged to the party of Protesters, most of whom were young men, and had, within a few years, entered upon the work of the Ministry. But it should also be considered, that the Act was purposely framed not to include such men as Robert Douglas and the leading Resolutioners, who had received ordination previously to the time fixed, and they thus enjoyed at least a temporary respite or indulgence, in the hope of their ultimate conformity.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. lxxxiii But it is not necessary to enter upon that dark and calamitous period; for, as " the righteous is taken away from the evil to come," so it was with Baillie and other eminent friends of the Church. He died at Glasgow towards the end of August 1662, in the 61st year of his age. No notice can be discovered of the place of his interment, or of any monument or inscription to his memory. Neither is any portrait of him known.1 He has however left behind him, in this Collection of Letters and Jour-nals, an enduring memorial. From a passage in a letter to the Earl of Glencairne, Lord Chancellor, in 1661, he refers to an intention he had of writing a detailed history of that period. " Since God hes put your Lordship, for the present, in the chief place of authoritie in our land and credit with his Majesty, be not content to lye by, but, as you would be faithfull to your Prince, Countrey, and Mother-Church, to which three after God ye are most oblidged, lend us now a lift; that, in the true account I may readilie give to the world and posteritie of what is past among us these thirty-six years, your Lordship's just character may be with the fairest of all, as I wish and hope it shall.'" Had Baillie accomplished this purpose, he might indeed have presented a fuller and more connected narrative, but divested probably of the very circumstances which now contribute to enhance the value of his Letters and Journals. Of the information which these Letters furnish, copious use has been made by writers of very opposite sentiments, who all concur, even while charging the author with narrow-minded bigotry and sectarian exclusiveness, in acknowledging their importance and value, as throwing much light on the spirit and policy of the Presbyterians, and as illustrating the history of that most memorable period. In regard to Baillie's qualifications for sustaining the literary reputation of his country, it is not necessary to enlarge. It will be seen that he maintained a friendly intercourse with several eminent scholars and divines on the continent; that he took a lively interest in promoting works of learning, more especially of biblical and oriental literature, both at home and abroad; and that he enjoyed the personal friendship not only of the leading men of his own country, but also of England. An Episcopal writer near his own time, thus mentions him among the " learned men and writers1' belonging to Glasgow : " Robert Baillie, Professor of Divinity, 1 There is no portrait of Baillie belonging to the University. It is highly probable that one was at Cambroe, the property of his last male descendant, General Matthew Baillie; but after his death, the various family reliques were unfortunately dispersed, and cannot now be traced. VOL. I. 711lxxxiv MEMOIR OF THE LIFE and afterwards Principal, a learned and modest man: though he published some very violent writings, yet those flowed rather from the instigation of other persons, than his own inclinations. He has left a great evidence of his diligence and learning in his Opus ChronologicumT1 The industrious historian Wodrow, who attributes his death to grief at the introduction of Prelacy, in his estimate of his literary character, says : " Mr. Robert Baillie may most justly be reckoned among the great men of this time, and was an honour to his country, for his profound and universal learning, his exact and solid judgment, that vast variety of languages he understood, to the number of twelve or thirteen, and his writing a Latin style which might become the Augustan age; but I need not enlarge on his character, his works do praise him in the gates.112 His knowledge of languages is probably overrated. In like manner Dr. Irving, who styles Baillie " one of the most learned men among the Scotish Presbyterians of the seventeenth century,'" has remarked, " This commendation of his Latinity, may admit of some abatement; for although he evidently possessed a very familiar knowledge of the language, his Latin style cannot safely be said to reach the standard of ancient purity and elegance.1'3 Mr. Brodie thus honourably associates the name of Baillie, with that of his party. " The clergy, on whom they greatly depended, were profound scholars, and no despicable politicians. Nothing can be more misplaced than the ridicule which has been so profusely levelled at that body. They proved themselves ambitious ; but, to be satisfied of their talents, and to admire their knowledge, it is only necessary to peruse their works. The writings of Baillie, even his familiar letters, breathe a manliness of spirit, and evince intelligence and erudition, that must for ever rescue from contempt, a class of which he did not conceive himself entitled to rank as the head.114 But it is unnecessary to quote the words of the various writers who have incidentally mentioned Baillie in terms of commendation.5 Of his 1 Appendix to the History of the Church of Scotland, (hy Thomas Middleton,) p. 36, Lond. 1677, 4to. The same words are repeated in more than one work. See Moodie's Scotiae Indiculum, &c. p. 214, Lond. 1682, 12mo. M'Ure's History of Glasgow, p. 227, Glasgow, 1736, 8vo. 2 History of the Sufferings of the Church of Scotland, vol. i. p. 128, fol. edit. ; vol. i. p. 288, 8vo edit, by Rev. Dr. Burns of Paisley, Glasgow, 1838, 4 vols. 3 Lives of Scotish Writers, vol. ii. p. 55. 4 History of the British Empire, vol. ii. p. 506. 5 In the second edition of the Biographia Britannica, Dr. Kippis has inserted an account of Baillie's life; and similar notices are contained in other biographical works, in Chalmers's Biographical Dictionary, in Chambers's Scottish Biography, in the last edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, and in Dr. Irving's Lives of Scotish Writers.OF ROBERT BAILLIE. Ixxxv own writings, he seems to have formed a very modest estimate.1 Of these, whether printed or manuscript, a full and minute list is subjoined to this Memoir, accompanied with a copy of his Last Will and Testament. This Appendix also contains Notices of his Family and Descendants, and an account of his cousin William Spang, to whom so many of his letters were addressed. In conclusion, it may be observed, that this series of Letters furnishes ample materials for judging of Baillie's personal character and dispositions. If from several of his private communications, he appears to have, been somewhat credulous, and of a sensitive disposition, cherishing aristocratic notions, and actuated by strong party-feelings and prejudices, inseparable from ordinary humanity, his Letters at the same time abound with the most convincing proofs of his warm attachment to his personal friends, his unwillingness to injure any of his opponents, and his readiness on all occasions to avow errors in judgment; while they bear witness to his innate modesty, his fervent piety, his firm adherence to covenanted religion, and his ardent love of learning, and above all, to his own unimpeachable integrity. Such a man could not fail to be esteemed in all the private relations of life. His native City and its University, with which he was so long and intimately associated, may well boast of him, as one of their chief ornaments during the seventeenth century. And, as the Church of Scotland should ever cherish the memory of those faithful and devoted ministers belonging to her Communion who have, in times of peril or difficulty, asserted her inalienable rights as a Christian Church, so, among the number of those kindred spirits, who have " obtained a good report, through faith,11 in bearing their testimony to the truth, an honourable place ought unquestionably to be assigned to ROBERT BAILLIE. D.L. Edinburgh, August 1842. l See vol. iii. pp. 478, 479.—In Baillie's Animadversions on a pamphlet by Tombes, the English Anabaptist, he says, " I think you much mistaken, while you suppose that the pamphlets of this unhappy time, and among the rest your's and mine, will ever be looked upon by after ages ; Dream not that such papers as ours will so long escape the teeth of the blatts and mothes, the chops of pottin-gars, and baser uses : such high conceits of our writings beseem not ourselves, unless with crowes and apes, our own brood be too beautiful in our eyes, most because our owne."APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. No. I. THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF MR. ROBERT BAILLIE. August MDCLXII. The testament testamentar and inventar of the goodis, geir, debtis, and soums of money quhilkis perteinit to vmquhile Master Robert Baillie, Principall of the Colledge of Glasgow, within the City therof, the tyme of his deceis, wha deceist in the moneth of August last bypast Jm. VI0. thriescoir twa zeiris, ffaithfully maid and givin vp be his awin mouth, in swa far as concerns the vpgiveing of the first artickle of the debtis awand, in nominatione of his executouris, tutouris testamentaris to his bairns, and legacies underwryttin; and partly maid and givin vp be Mr. Hendry Bayllie, only lawfull sone to the defunct, and Helen Strang, relict of the defunct, only conjunct executouris testamentaris nominat be him, in swa far as concerns the vpgyveing of the inventar of the defunctis goodis and geir remanent debtis awand in, and debtis awand out; as the Defunctis Testament and Letter-will of the dait eftir specifiet, in the self at mair lenth maks mentione. Inventar.—Item, the Defunct had the tyme of his deceis forsaid, per-teining and belonging to him as his awin proper the goodis and geir vnderwryttin of the pryces followeing, viz. in the first the defunctis haill bookis estimat worth IIm. lib. Item, of ready lyand money, Ic. xx. lib. Item, the insicht and plenisching of the defunctis hous, in vtencillis and domicillis, with the abulziementis of the defunctis body, estimat (by and attour the air-schip) worth ij°. lib. Summa of the Inventar, . . . Ijm.iijc.xx. lib. Debtis awand in.—Item, ther was awand to the Defunct the. tyme of his deceis forsaid, the soums of money followeing, be the persons vnder-wrytten, viz. In the first, be the executouris of vmquhile Doctor John Strang, Principall of the College of Glasgow, his father in law, be his Testament, iij°.xxxiij lib. vi s. viij d. Item, be the Laird of Luss and his cautioners, be ther band, half ane zeiris annuelrent, of sevin thousand merkis preceiding the term of Whitsonday, 1662 zeiris instant, ic.xl. lib. Item, be the Laird of Corshill and his cawtioners, be band, for half a zeiris annuelrent of twa thousand merkis, preceiding the said term of Whitsonday last bypast, xl. lib. Item, be the Laird of Coninghameheid, for a zeir and ane half zeiris annuelrent, of tfie principall soume of twelf thousandlxxxviii APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. I. and fyve hundreth merkis, preceicling the said term of Whitsonday term last bypast, vij°.l. lib. Item, be the Lord Cochran and Sir Adam Blair of Lochwood, for ane zeiris annuelrent, preceiding the said term of Whitsonday last bypast, of twa thousand merkis principall soume, lxxx. lib. Item, be the aforsaid Laird of Luss, for half ane zeiris annuelrent, of ffyve thousand merkis principall soume preceiding the said term, quhilk soume was contractit and assignit be the said Helen Strang to the defunct, i°. lib, Item, be the Laird of Blaire, for half ane zeiris annualrent, preceiding the said term, of wther fyve thousand merkis principall soume, i°. lib. Item, mair be him restand of preceiding zeiris annuelrents of the said soume, attour the said half zeiris annuelrent, lxvi. lib. xiij s. iv d. Item, be the Colledge of Glasgow, of stipend four chalders of meell, pryce of the boll therof vij lib. vi s. viij d. inde iiij0. lxix. lib. vi s. viij d.; with twa chalders of beir, pryce of the boll therof viij lib. inde ij°. lvi. lib. and vii°. xxxiij lib. vi°. viij d. of silver. Item, mair be the said Colledge for ilk quarter of four quarters boording of the defunct, quhilk the said Colledge was in vse to pay to the defunct for his table, at xlviij lib. the quarter, inde ic.lxxxxij lib. Summa of the Debtis in, . Iijm.ijc.lx. lib. xiij s. iv d. Summa of the Inventar and Debtis, Vmvc.lxxx. lib. xiij s. iv d. Debtis aw and out.—Item, ther was awand be the Defunct, the tyme of his deceis, the soumes of money efter specifeit, to the persons efter mentionat, viz.—In the first, to Margaret Porter, of fie and bounteth the said zeir, xxviij. lib. Item, to Catherin Scott for half a zeiris fie, the said zeir, viij. lib. Item, to Agnes Clerk, for half a zeiris fie, the said zeir, viij. lib. x s; and to Jonet Buchannen, of fie, the said zeir, vij. lib. Summa of the Debtis out. . lij. lib. Restis frie geir debtis deduceit, . Vm. vic. xxviij. lib. xiij. iv d. To be divydit in thrie partis. Deidis part is, im. vc. ix. lib. xis. i d. ob. Quota be compositioun, xxxvij lib. xvs. vid. Followis the Deidis Letter-will and Legacies. At Glasgow, the aughtein day of August 1662 zeiris.—The quhilk day Mr. Robert Bayllie, Principall of the Colledge of Glasgow, being seikly and infirm of body, but off perfyt memory, knowing nothing mor certan then death, and nothing mor vncertan then the tym and hour of caus, he maks his Testament and Letter-will as followes Quhairin he recommendis his soull to God, trusting only to be saved throw the merits of Jesus Chryst, his Redeimer and Saviour, and earnestly desyreing God to par-doune his many sins from his bairn age, and in Chrystis blood to mack him cleane and acceptable in his sight. And as for his worldly affairis, he, be thir presentis, nominats, macks, and constitutis Master Hendry Bayllie, his only sone, and Helen Strang, his beloved spous, his only exe-cutouris and vniversall intromittouris with his haill goodis, geir, debtis, and soums of money quhatsumevir belonging to him, with full power to them to give vp inventar therof, debtis awand in and out. Item, he leives in legacie to the said Helen Strang, his spous, ffyve hundreth merkis Scottis that is zit resting to him by vmqle Doctor Strang's Testament, and the second silver tanker; Togidder with all the insycht plennisching and houshold stuff schoe brought with hir at hir mariage, conform to ane inventar therof, subscrivit with his hand, of the dait the aughtein day of Junij 1662 zeiris instant; Togiclder also with the haill rest of the insychtNo. II.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. lxxxix and plenisching of his hous by the airschip, onyways made or bought, since hir coming to his house, that shoe pleisis to tack. Item, he leives in legacie to Helen Bayllie, his dochter, the silver pottinger; and to Elspeth Bayllie, his other dochter, the leist silver tass. Item, he lieves in legacie to the persons following the particular soums followeing, viz. to Agnes Clerk, nyne pundis Scotis; to Catherin Scott, aught pund ; to Margaret Porter, vij lib ; to Bessie M'Alpin, viij lib ; to Jo11 Graham, ten pund; to Jo11 Dinn, ten pundis ; to Jonet Donald, ten markis; to Christen Herriot, ten merkis; to Jo4. Wallace, fyve merkis; to Richard Bayllie, twenty merkis ; and to [a blank in the MS.] fyve merkis. Item, he leivs to the Colledge the bookis followeing, viz. Aristotle's workis in Greik and Latin, twa volums; Item, Buxtouris [BuxtorfFs] Dictionary; Item, Lucian's workis in Greik and Latin, in folio, ane volum. Item, he leivs to the said Helen Strang, his spouse, Mr. James Durham's twa volums; Item, all Mr. James Fergusson and Mr. Alexander Nisbitis workis; togidder with als many of his awin English bookis as schoe de-syris. Item, his debtis and legacies being payit, he leivs the haill rest of his third part of his haill goodis, geir, and debtis to the said Master Henry Bayllie, his sone, with his haill remanent bookis, except ane quarter therof, quhilk he leivs to Mr. Wm Eckles, his sone-in-law. Item, in caice the said Master Hendry, his sone, depart this mortall lyff before his law-full mariage, then and in that cais he leivs and ordains his portion naturall and legacie to fall and belong to his four sisters, viz. to Lillias Baillie, his eldest sister, ane thousand merkis Scottis, and to Helen, Elspeth, and Mary Bayllies, his wther sisters, to ilk ane of them two thousand merkis. Item, if any of the saidis Helen, Elspeth, or Mary Baillies depart this lyfe befor ther lawfull mariage, then and in that cais, he leivs and ordains ther haill portiouns quhatsumevir to fall and belong to the said Mr. Hendry Bayllie, if he be on lyf. And in cais Mar* Bayllie, his yongest dochter, depart this lyf befor hir mariage, or at leist befor schoe be of the age of twelf zeiris complet, then and in that cais, he leivs and ordains hir haill portioun quhatsumevir of ten thousand merkis, provydit be him to her in his contract of mariage with hir mother, the ane half therof to fall and belong to the said Mr. Hendry, his sone, and the other half therof to hir four sisters, Lillias, Helen, Elspeth, and Mary Bayllies, proportionally amangst them. Item, he nominatis and constitutis the said Master Hendry, his sone, tutor-testamentar to the said Mary Bayllie, his yongest sister, during hir pupillarity, and als nominatis and constitutis the said Helen Strang, his spous, tutrix-testamentar to the said Margaret Bayllie, hir dochter, dureing hir pupillarity. And last, he ordains and appointis all his children to honour and reverence his said Spous as ther mother, and in nothing to give hir offens; desyreing them all to obey and fulfill this his letter-will, as they wold desyre his speciall blessing; quhilk he accordingly lives them, and prays the Lord to bliss them all in lyf and death. In witnes quherof, thir presentis, wryttin by Mr. Jo11 Herbertson, notar in Glasgow, and subscrivit with his hand as followes. Att day, yeir, and place forsaid, befor thir witnessis, James Cuthbert, porter to the said Colledge, and the said Mr. Jon Herbertson, wryter heirof. Sic subscribitur, R. Baillie. James Curbett, witnes. Mr. J. Herbertson, witnes. I, Mr. Wm Fleming of Ferm, Commissr of Glasgow, be the tenour heirof, ratify, approve, and confirm this present Testament and Inventar,xc APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. II. in swa far as the samin is leillily and treuly maid and givin vp, nothing omittit furth therof, nor sett within the just availl therm conteinit; and give and committ full power of intromission with the goodis, geir, and debtis abovewryttin, to the saidis executouris testamentaris above nominat allenerly, with power to them to call and persew therfor, if neid beis, becaus they have maid faith, as vse is, and fund cation as law wall, as an act maid thervpon at lenth beiris. Att Glasgow, the sextin day of Decr 1662 zeiris. The quhilk day compeirit personally Mr. Wm Ecldes, minister at Air, and of his awin consent actit and obleist himself as cawtioner and soverty for Mr. Hary Bayllie, and Helen Strang, executouris confirmit to vmqhile Mr. Robert Bayllie, that the goodis, geir, debtis, and soums of money conteinit in the defunctis confirmit Testament, sal be furthcomand to all parties haveand entres as law will; and the saidis executouris oblis them-selv, conjunctly and seuerally, to releive ther said cawtioner of his ca17 above-specifeit, and of all danger theranent, as also to releive otheris executouris. Quhervpon they askit actis. Befor thir witnessis, Wm Selkrig, wryter in Glasgow, James Cuthbert, porter in the Colledge, and James Lees, mer\ Sic subscribitur, Will. Eccles, Helen Strang, Mr. Henry Bayllie. W. Selkrig, witnes. Ja. Lees, witnes. No. II. LIST OF BAILLIE'S PRINTED WORKS. I.—The Oanterburians Self-Conviction. 1640. 1. " Ladensivm "attokatakpixis, The Oanterburians Self-Conviction: or, An evident demonstration of the avowed Arminianisme, Poperie, and tyrannie of that faction, by their owne confessions; with a postscript to the Personat Jesuite Lysimachus Nicanor, a prime Canterburian. Written in March, and printed [at Edinburgh] in Aprile, 1640." 4to. Collation, title, 10 leaves not paged of " Summa Capitum," and the Preface ; pp. 128, (page 115-122 being erroneously repeated as 107-114,) with a leaf " Escapes of the Printerand " A Postscript for the personat Iesuit Lysimachus Nicanorpp. 28. 2. " Ladensivm 'attokatakpixis, The Oanterburians Self-Conviction, &c." 1640-41. Reprinted under the above title, at Amsterdam, as appears from the subsequent edition. It contains the same number of leaves as the previous edition, (except the leaf of Errata, which is omitted, although these corrections were not attended to,) but printed with a smaller type, and in a more illegible form ; and the preface, which in the original copy is Italic type, in this reprint is in Roman character. 3. " Ladensivm attokatakpisis, The Oanterburians Self-Conviction, &c. (as above.) The third Edition augmented by the Author, with a large Supplement. And corrected in Typographicke faults, not these onely which in a huge number did escape through negligence and ignorance that Printer at Amsterdam, but these also, which in the very first EditionNo. II.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. xci were but too many. Helped also in sundry materiall Passages, wherein the Author hath received better information. [London,] printed for Nathaniel Butter, 1641. 4to." Collation, title, ten leaves, and pp. 131, followed by a separate title, " A Large Supplement of the Canterburian Self-conviction. Opening to the World, yet more of the wicked Mysteries of that Faction from their own Writs. Imprinted, 1641.11 This portion contains pp. 80, (erroneously marked 70, while there are no pages 39-40, 49-50,) besides the title, and a leaf of Errata ; with " A Postscript for the personate Iesuite Lysimachus Nicanorpp. 37, separately numbered. 4. In some copies of this edition the preceding title was cancelled, and the following substituted :—" The Life of William now Lord Arch-Bishop of Canterbury, Examined. Wherein his principall Actions, or Deviations in matters of Doctrine and Discipline (since he came to that Sea of Canturbury) are traced, and set downe, as they were taken from good hands, by Mr. Robert Bayley, a Learned Pastor of the Kirk of Scotland, and one of the late Commissioners sent from that Nation. Very fitting for all judicious men to reade, and examine, that they may be the better able to censure him for those things wherein he hath done amisse. Reade and Judge. London, printed for N. B. in the Yeare of Grace 1643." No other alteration was made, the above title to the " Large Supplement,11 dated 1641, being still retained. 2.—Parallel of the Liturgy and Mass-Book. 1641. 1. " A Parallel or Briefe Comparison of the Liturgie with the Masse-Book, the Breviarie, the Ceremoniall, and other Romish Ritualls. Wherein is clearly and shortly demonstrated, not onely that the Liturgie is taken for the most part word by word out of these Antichristian Writts ; but also that not one of the most abominable passages of the Masse can in reason be refused by any who cordially imbrace the Liturgie as now it stands, and is commented by the Prime of our Clergie. All made good from the Testimonies of the most famous and learned Liturgick Writers, both Romish and English,—By R. B. K. [Robert Baillie, Kilwinning.] Seene and allowed. London, printed by Thomas Paine, and are to be sold at the Castle, in Cornhill, 1641. Other copies instead of this imprint, have simply, " Printed in the Yeare 16414to. Collation, title, 5 leaves of preface, and pp. 95. At page 85 is " A Compend of the preceding Treatise, in a Speech at the Generall Assembly of Glasgow, 1638.'" 2. This treatise was republished after the Restoration, without the author's permission or knowledge : See his letter to Lord Lauderdale, 9th September 1661, (vol. iii. p. 478). In one thing, however, he was mistaken, in asserting that nothing was reprinted " but the title-page alone, by some cheating printer there, to make some old copies of the first and only impression sell. However, believe me, I know no more of that cheater's deed than the child unborn; nor know I at all who is the man.11 Baillie was probably misled in this assertion by seeing a copy with the altered title of 1641; but the edition that was complained of, bears this title :—" A Parallel of the Liturgy with the Mass-Book, the Breviary, the Ceremonial, and other Romish Rituals. Wherein is clearly and shortly demon- vol. i. nxcii APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. II. strated, not onely that the Liturgy is taken for the most part word for word out of these Antichristian Writs; but also that not one of the most Abominable passages of the Mass can in reason be refused by any who cordially imbrace the Liturgy, as now it stands, and is commented by the Prime of our Clergy. All made good from the Testimonies of the most famous and learned .Liturgick Writers, both Romish and English. By that Reverend and faithful Preacher of God's Word, Robert Bayly, late of G-lasco in Scotland. Printed in the year, 1661." 4to. Collation, title, 4 leaves, and pp. 80. At p. 73 is " A Compend of the preceding Treatise, in a speech at the Generall Assembly of Glasgow, 1638." Some' remarks on Baillie's Parallel are subjoined to a tract entitled, " Beaten Oyle for the Lamps of the Sanctuarie; or the Great Controversy concerning Set Prayers, and our Liturgy examined." By Laurence Womock, afterwards Bishop of St. Davids. Lond. 1641, 4to. 3.—Antidote against Arminianism. 1641. 1. " An Antidote against Arminianisme ; or a plain and brief discourse wherein the state of the Question in all the five infamous Articles of Ar-minius is set downe, and the Orthodox Tenets confirmed by cleere scriptu-rall grounds. Framed of purpose for the capacity of the more simple sort of People. By R. B. K. [Robert Baillie, Kilwinning.] London, printed for Sa. Gellibrand, m.dc.xli." 12°. Collation, title, 7 leaves " To the sequitable Reader,11 and pp. 114. This little volume was intended to serve as a short and simple manual of such controversies.—The author says, " In its first birth it was a Speech delivered upon a short warning in the Generall Assembly of Glasgow, 1638, and there not mislikt. Since that time, it hath not increased much in stature.11 2. A number of copies of this little volume remaining unsold in the publisher's hands, it was brought out with a new title in 1652 as follows :— " A Scotch Antidote against the English Infection of Arminianism. Which little Book may be (through God's blessing) very useful to preserve those that are yet sound in the faith, from the Infection of Mr. John Goodwin's great Book. By Robert Bailie, Minister of the Gospel at Glasgow. London, printed for Samuel Gellibrand, at the Ball in Paul's Church-yard, 1652.11 The changes made, consist in six leaves at the beginning being reprinted, in order to omit the first three leaves of the text. The address " To the ./Equitable Reader11 is preserved unchanged; but the Antidote itself, instead of commencing on page 1, with " The Coherence of this Antidote with the former Self-conviction" [of the Canter-burians], begins on page 7, with " Who Arminius was;" and ending, like the original copies, on page 114. 4.—Unlawfulness of Limited Episcopacy. 1641. While the Scotish Commissioners were in London, at Strafford's Trial, there was published anonymously,—" The Vnlavvfullnes and Danger of Limited Prelacie, or Perpetuall Presidensie in the. Church, briefly discovered. (3 John 9, &c.) Printed in the yeare, 1641." 4to, 12 leaves.No. II.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. ' xciii From what Baillie states (vol. ii. p. 40,) the author of this tract appears to have been Alexander Henderson. Soon after a reply to it appeared as " A Modest Advertisement concerning the present Controversie about Church-Government; wherein the maine Grounds of that Booke, intituled, The Unlawfulnesse and Danger of Limited Prelacie, are calmly examined. London, printed for Robert Bostock, Anno 1641." 4to, 11 leaves. A MS. note on the title of a copy in the British Museum, ascribes this tract to Dr. Morley, who became Bishop of Winchester; but Baillie, who was no doubt well informed on this head, has ascribed it to Dr. Eglionby or Aglionby, (vol. ii. p. 40.) To this pamphlet Baillie speedily published a rejoinder, under this title :— " The Vnlawfvlnesse and Danger of Limited Episcopacie. Whereunto is subioyned a short reply to the Modest advertiser and calme examinator of that Treatise. As also The Question of Episcopacie discussed from Scripture and Fathers. By Robert Bailly, Pastor of Killwunning in Scotland. London, printed for Thomas Vnderhill, at the Bible in Wood-street : 1641.'''' 4to. Collation, title, and pp. 47. Baillie's tract seems originally to have appeared anonymously : at least in some copies his name is omitted. One of these in the Glasgow University Library, (A. H. 13, 6,) has on the title-page written in Baillie1 s hand, " For his much belovit Brother, M. G. Yong." The leaf after the title contains the following address :— " To the equitable Reader.—Some moneths ago there came out, from a learned and very judicious hand, a small treatise to prove the unlawfulnesse and danger of limited Prelacy. Shortly thereafter, there appeared in answer to this, a modest Advertisement, and calme Examination, which was sent enclosed in a letter, from a Bishop of prime place, to a Stationer for the press, written whether by the Bishop himself, or a friend of his acquaintance, a Doctor of good esteeme, I do not know. Some very few days after the first appearance of this answer, the reply following was readie, albeit till now it could not get the benefit of a presse. I confess the Reply is not suitable to the great worth of the first Treatise, but if it do sufficiently retund with cleere reason, all that the Answerer has opposed, it attains its end. of this performance be thou the judge, unto thy discretion I freely permit the pronouncing of the sentence. I could wish from thy hands but one not very unreasonable favour, that thou mightest be pleased to call for, & compare all the three Writs which are al but short, that thou wouldst lay together in every passage, first, what the Authour did say, Secondly, what the Bishop or Doctor does answer, and thirdly, what is here replied. This little labour will enable thee from due consideration to make they equitable decree in the court of thy conscience, according to which thou mayst cheerfully proceed, first, to thy hearty desires, and thereafter, as thy calling permits, to thy best endeavours, either for the holding up or pulling down this much agitate estate of Bishops. Farewell On the last page is this notice:—" The Stationer to the buying Reader. —Loving Reader, bee pleased to take notice that the question of Episcopacie discussed from Scripture and Fathers, promised upon the title of this Book, was intended by the Reverend Author to be joyned to this Reply, but some weighty cause having brought this to publike view first, and by itselfe, I thought good (after the printing of the said title, in service both to him and thee) to give notice of it. I rest, Yours, T. V.nxciv APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. II. It appears that Baillie, on leaving London, had left various papers in the Printer's hands, (vol. i. p. 357) ; but he himself for some time was ignorant whether or not they had been published, and it seems almost certain, that " The Question of Episcopacy discussed from Scripture and Fathers," never was printed. There are one or two English tracts of the time under nearly a similar title ; but no copy of Baillie's treatise can be discovered in any collection. In the Bodleian Library there is a volume of Baillie's collected tracts, presented by the Author to Selden in 1644; and no doubt had this " Question of Episcopacy" been actually printed, it would not have been omitted. The volume contains his Sermon 1644, the Canterburians Self Conviction, 1641, the Large Supplement, 1641, the Parallel, 1641, and the Unlawfullness of Limited Episcopacy, with the following inscription,—" For the most lernd, his noble friend, Mr. Selden, in testimony of his high respect. R. Baillie." This Greek motto, " The future (is) unseen," also occurs on a copy of his Sermon 1644, in the Editor's possession, but the first line of the inscription has been cut off by the binder, which contained the name of the person to whom it was presented " in testimony of my grit affection and 5.—Sermon before the House of Commons. 1644. " Satan, the Leader in chief to all who resist the Reparation of Sion. As it was cleared in a Sermon [on Zech. 3. 1, 2,] to the Honourable House of Commons, at their late solemn Fast, Febr. 28, 1643. By Robert Baylie, Minister at Glasgow. Published by order of the House of Commons. (Micah 6. 9, and 7. 8, 9.) London, printed for Samuel Gellibrand, at the Brasen Serpent in Pauls Church-yard, 1643." 4to, pp. [xii.] and 54. The Epistle Dedicatory, signed Robert Bayly, is thus addressed, " For the Right Worshipfull, his much honoured friend, M. Rous, one of the Members of the Honourable House of Commons." Prefixed is the order, " That Mr. Rous does from this House give thanks unto Master Robert Baylie, for the great paines he took in the Sermon, .... and to desire him to print his Sermon." It is dated 1643, according to the English mode of reckoning at the time, but the year was 1643-4. 6.—Sermon before the House of Lords. 1645. „ Errours and Induration, are the Great Sins and the Great Judgements of the Time. Preached in a Sermon [on Isaiah 63. 17,] before the Right Honourable House of Peers, in the Abbey-Church at Westminster, July 30,1645, the day of the Monethly Fast: By Robert Baylie, Minister at Glasgow. (1, Thess. 12. 10, 11, 12.—Math. 7. 15.—Math. 15. 14.) London, printed by R. Raworth, for Samuel Gellibrand, at the Brasen-Serpent in Pauls Church-yard, 1645." 4to. Collation, pp. [ix.], 44, and leaf not paged, containing this notice : " Die Jovis, 31 Julij 1645.—Ordered by the Lords in Parliament, That Master Baylie, who preached yesterday before the Lords of Parliament Apr. 18, 1644. respect, R. Baillie.'No. II.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. xcv in the Abbey-Church Westminster, it being the day of the Publike Fast, is hereby thanked for the great pains he took in his Sermon, and desired to print and publish the same; which is to be printed by none but such as shall be authorised by the said Master Baylie. J oh. Brown, Cler. Parliamentorum. " I do appoint Samuel Gellibrand to print my Sermon. Robert Baylie.11 7.—Dissuasive from the Errors of the Time. 1645. 1. " A Dissvasive from the Errours of the Time : Wherein the Tenets of the principall Sects, especially of the Independents, are drawn together in one Map, for the most part, in the words of their own Authours, and their maine principles are examined by the Touch-stone of the Holy Scriptures. By Robert Baylie Minister at Glasgow. (Jer. 3; Jude v. 3.) Published by Authority. London, printed for Samuel Gellibrand, at the Brasen Serpent in Pauls Church-yard, 1645.11 4to. Collation, pp. [xxiv.] 1 to 96, and 101 to 252. This work has a dedication, " For the Right Honourable the Earle of Lauderdaile, Lord Metelane,"1 dated " Londone, Novemb. 19, 1645.11 2. The work was so well received, that on the 15th January following, the Author writes, " I thank God my Dissuasive hes done no evill here ...The whole first impression is sold; the second I expect to-morrow." There is no difference however between the two impressions except that the date is changed from 1645 to 1646. In 1648, a large volume was published as " A Survey of the Summe of Church-Discipline, &c." by Mr. Thomas Hooker and Mr. John Cotton. The; latter entitles his portion, " The Way of Congregational Churches cleared : In two Treatises ; in the former, from the Historical Aspersions of Mr. Robert Baylie, in his book, called A Disswasive from the Errors of the Time : In the latter, &c. By Mr. John Cotton . . now Teacher of the Church at Boston, in New England.1' Lond. 1648, 4to. 8.—Historical Vindication. 1646. " An Historicall Vindication of the Government of the Church of Scotland, from the manifold base calumnies which the most Malignant of the Prelats did invent of old, and now lately have been published with great industry in two Pamphlets at London. The one intituled Issachars burden, &c. written and published at Oxford by John Maxwell, a Scottish Prelate, excommunicate by the Church of Scotland, and declared an unpardonable Incendiary by the Parliaments of both Kingdoms. The other falsely intituled A Declaration made by King James in Scotland, concerning Church-Government and Presbyteries; but indeed written by Patrick Adamson, pretended Archbishop of St. Andrews, contrary to his own conscience, as himselfe on his Death-bed did confesse and subscribe before many Witnesses in a write hereunto annexed. By Robert Baylie Minister at Glasgow. Published according to Order. London, printedxcvi APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. II. for Samuel Gellibrand, at the Brasen-Serpent in Pauls-Churchyard, 1646.11 4to, Collation pp. [xvi.], 79, and 56. The Epistle Dedicatory, " For his Reverend and welbeloved Brother, Mr. Robert Blaire, Minister of St. Andrewes," is dated " Worcester-House, July 29th, 1646. This work is divided into two parts; the first with the title " The Unloading of Issachar's Burthen,1' contains pp. 79 ; the second, or " An Answer to the Declaration," pp. 56. 9.—Second Part of the Dissuasive. 1647. " Anabaptisme, the True Fountaine of Independency, Brownisme, Antinomy, Familisme, and the most of the other Errours, which for the time doe trouble the Church of England, Unsealed. Also the Questions of Psedobaptisme and Dipping handled from Scripture. In a Second Part of The Dissuasive from the Errors of the time. By Robert Baillie, Minister at Glasgow. (Zach. 13 2; 2 Pet. 2, 1, 2.) London, printed by M. F. for Samuel G-ellibrand, at the Brazen Serpent in Pauls Churchyard, 1647." 4to. Collation, pp. [xxxii.] and 191, the last 10 pages (of Contents, &c.) not being numbered. It has an Epistle prefixed, " For the Right Honourable the Earl of Lauderdail, Viscount Metellan, Lord Thirleston and Bolton," dated " Worcester House, the 28th Decemb. 1646." 10.—Answer to Bishop Bramhall's Warning. 1649. 1. "A Review of Doctor Bramble, late Bishop of Londenderry, his Faire Warning against the Scotes Discipline. By R. B. G-. [Robert Baillie, Glasgow]. Printed at Delf, by Michiel Stael, dwelling at the Turf-Market, 1649.11 4to, pp. [viii] and 91. This treatise was in reply to " A Faire Warning to take heed of" the Scotish Discipline, as being of all others most Injurious to the Civil Magistrate, most Oppressive to the Subject, most Pernicious to both. By Dr. John Bromwell, Lord Bishop of London-Derrie, in Ireland. Printed in the year 1649." 4to, pp. 36. Some copies of this edition omit the author's name (Bramhall, vulgarly pronounced Bramble) in the title-page ; and it afterwards reprinted. It was this tract to which Baillie refers in his letters from the Hague, as so much calculated to prejudice the King against the Presbyterians. Prefixed to Baillie's Review, is a letter " For the Right Honourable the noble and potent Lord John Earle of Cassils, Lord Kennedy, &c. one of his Majestie's privie counsel, and Lord Iustice generall of Scotland ;" dated from the " Hague this 1649." A note at the end contains a list of Errata, stating that these and many others were occasioned by " the Author's absence from the presse the whole time of the impression, and the Printer's unacquaintance with the English language." 2. Baillie's treatise was republished, with greater typographical correctness, (probably at London, although bearing Delph on the title-page,) as follows :— " A Review of the seditious pamphlet lately published in Holland by Dr. Bramhell, pretended Bishop of London-Derry ; entitled, His faireNo. II.J APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. xcvii Warning against the Scots Discipline. In which, His malicious and most lying Reports, to the great scandall of that Government, are fully and clearly refuted. As also, The Solemne League and Covenant of the three Nations justified and maintained. By Robert Baylie, Minister at Glasgow, and one of the Commissioners from the Church of Scotland, attending the King at the Hague. Printed at Delph, by Mich. Stait, dwelling at the Turf-Market, 1649." 4to. Collation, pp. [viii.] and 71, erroneously marked 64. Baillie's Review of BramhalFs pamphlet drew forth a very long and bitter reply, entitled " akoaotgos or a Second Faire Warning to take heed of the Scotish Discipline, in vindication of the First, (which the R* Reverend Father in God, the Ld Bishop of London-Derrie, published A0 1649,) against a schismatical and seditious Reviewer, R. B. G. one of the bold Commissioners from the Rebellious Kirke in Scotland, to his Sacred Ma-jestie K. Charles the Second, when at the Hage, By Ri. Watson, Chap-lane to the R4 Hoble the Lord Hopton. Hagh, printed by Samuel Broun, English Bookeseller. 1651.'" 4to. Collation, pp. [xx.], 204, and 4 leaves of the table. Prefixed is a very scurrilous letter against Baillie, addressed to Watson from his " unfained, affectionate friend, brother, fellow sufferer, and servant, Rob. Creighton," dated from " Utrecht, in the very Ides of December 1650."" 3. After the Restoration, some copies of these tracts remaining unsold in the publisher's hands, they were bound together, with a new title-page, as—" Three Treatises concerning the Scotish Discipline. 1. A Fair Warning to take heed of the same : By the Right Reverend Dr. Bramhall, Bishop of Derrie. 2. A Review of Dr. Bramble, late Bishop of London-Derry, his Fair Warning, &c. By R. B. G. 3. A Second Fair Warning, in Vindication of the First, against the Seditious Reviewer: By Ri. Watson, Chaplain to the Right Honourable the Lord Hopton. To which [third treatise] is prefixed, A Letter written by the Reverend Dean of St. Burien, Dr. Creyghton. Hagh: printed by Samuel Broun, English Book-seller, 1661." 11.—Praxis Grammatics HebrjEs. 1653. " Appendix Practica ad Ioannis Buxtorfii Epitomen Grammaticae Hebraeae. In gratiam Tyronum qui in sacri textus penetralia, absque longis ambagibus, & profundiori scrutinio manuduci desiderant.. Una cum Quaestionibus aliquot Hebraicis Grammaticae usum demonstrantibus, in collatione cum Originali, Versionum Chaldaicae, Graecae, Latinae cum vul-gatae turn Tremellii ac interlinearis Montani; etiam Gallicae Bezae, Italicae Deodati, Belgicae Dordracenorum, & Anglicanae tam veteris quam novae, in textibus aliquot illustribus ; ubi Interpretes cum longissime a seinvicem, Saepe tamen parum aut nihil ab Hebraeo descedere videntur. Praelecta Studiosis Linguae Sanctae in Academia Glasguensi. Anno 1650, hora locoque solitis. Edinburgi, excudebat Andreas Anderson, 1653." Small 8vo. Collation, pp. [xvi.] and 112, followed by the " Qusestiones Hebraicae, pp. 48."xcviii APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. II. 12.—Cateci-iesis Elenctica Errorum. 1654. " Cateciiesis Elenctica Errorum qui hodie vexant Ecclesiam, ex nudis sacrae Scripturse testimoniis, in brevibus ac claris Quaestionibus ac Re-sponsionibus proposita. In gratiam studiosse Juventutis Academiae Glasguensis. Imprimatur, Edw. Calamy. Londini, excudebat Thomas Maxey, impensis Sa. Gellibrand, Bibliopolae Londinensis, 1654." Small 12mo, pp. [xvi.] 175. This Catechism is dedicated, " Reverendo clarissimoque viro D. Davidi Dicksono, Sacrae Theologiee in Academia Edinburgena Professori, Salutem. (Signed) Tuus in Ohristo Frater, R. Bailie.11 Grlasguse, 4 Oal. Sextilis 1653. In the dedication, he says, " Ista autem tibi (Reverende Frater) in-scribo, non tantum ut meorum studiorum tibi rationem redderem, prout a puero semper consuevi, sed ut cum gaudio perciperes eandem in Academia Glasguana orthodoxiam ad hunc diem perseverare, ringente licet et contra nitente magna cum arte, turn vi Satanee quam tu nobis discedens commis-sisti, et ut perpetuo frueremur (pro tuo virili) egregie sategisti.11 13.—The Dissuasive Vindicated. 1655. " The Disswasive from the Errors of the Time, Vindicated from the Exceptions of Mr. Cotton and Mr. Tombes. By Robert Baily, Minister at Glasgow. London, printed by Evan Tyler for Samuel Gellibrand, at the Golden Ball in Pauls Churchyard, 1655." 4to. Collation, pp. 88, (pages 32-34 being omitted), besides 2 leaves of Errata and " The Preface, Apologizing for the Authours long silence.11 The work by Cotton to which this Vindication refers, " The Way of Congregational Churches Cleared," 1648, has already been noticed. Baillie in the Second part of his Disswasive, pp. 91-2, having made some observations on Tombes1 s Exercitation and Apology for his Two Treatises concerning Infant Baptism, Tombes, whom Baillie calls " a learned and very bold man,11 felt aggrieved by these remarks, and failing to receive any private redress, to what Baillie calls " a long and very bitter letter,11 he presented a complaint to the Synod or Assembly, or as Baillie describes it, "a printed process of false accusations before the Provincial Synod of Glasgow, and the Generall Assembly of Scotland, my true Superiors and very proper Judges,11 which constrained Baillie to break " the bonds of his resolved silence" to all his opponents. Before this answer appeared, some reference to Baillie1 s former Treatise, occurs in the 19th, 20th, and 31st chapters of Tombes's " Antipsedobaptisme, the Second Part," 1654, 4to, at the end of which, among his other publications, he includes, " An Addition to the Apology, in a Letter to Mr. Robert Baillee of Scotland." This is not mentioned in the enumeration of his works, given in Wood^ Athenae Oxon. (vol. iii. p. 1063,)—but a copy of it is preserved in the Bodleian Library, and to the kindness of the Rev. Dr. Bliss, I am indebted for the following notice of this very curious tract. The title is :— " An Addition to the Apology for the two Treatises concerning Infant-Baptisme, published December 15, 1645. In which the Author is Vindicated from 21 unjust Criminations in the 92 page of the Book of Mr. RobertNo. II.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. xci.x <( That in pursuance of the Solemne Covenant taken by me, to endeavour reformation in God's worship, according to the word of God ; I published Two Treatises about Infant-Baptisme at London, December 15,1645, and an Apology for them in August 1646, and that in the year 1647, a book intituled Anabaptisme was published at London, by Robert Bayly, Minister of Glasgow; wherein I was wronged by many grievous false accusations : concerning which I have (as near as I could) followed the rule of Christ, Mat. 18. 15, 16, 17, as maybe perceived by the close of the letter to Mr. Bayly himself. For after 1 had advertised him by Mr. Henry Scudder, of the injury he had done me, I wrote to him July 22, 1647, which letter was delivered to Mr. Samuel Rutherford Sept. 17, 1647, with Directions how to send back. And in the year 1649, I wrote a letter to Mr. Rutherford, to certify me what became of my writing delivered to him ? with desire to know what Mr. Bayly would do to right me; yet after so long waiting, I find no remorse or righting of me made by the said Mr. Robert Bayly: And therefore I do devolve the matter into your hands, being taken for the Church, to which such complaints should be made, according to the rule, Mat. 18.17. and do expect to have right done by you to him and me, as to a Fellow-Christian—Presbyter—and Covenanter with you, as is meet in such a cause concerning the truth of God, and inno-cency of your Brother. And forasmuch as the charge against him and proof may be evidently seen in this letter to him, and his and my writings, (which [if you please to take notice of,] you may easily come by;) I presume you will not expect my personal appearance before you to pursue this Complaint; but of yourselves examine the matter, as 1 conceive the rule of Christ binds you ; besides the engagements towards a Fellow-Covenanter in the sixth article of the Solemne League'and Covenant, and permit your fellow-servant to attend the work of Christ, in the place where he is seated; who shall pray for your welfare; and continue Your Brother and Fellow-Servant in Christ, London, Sept. 24, 1650. John Tombes." " The conclusion requiring reparation of the wrong done to me by Mr. Baillie. " Now Sir, I referre it to your self to judge whether any Author, Papist or Protestant, have in so small a compasse as one page of a leafe in 4[t0], and some few lines in another so wronged his adversary, as you have done me in so many false accusations, tending to beget prejudice against my writing, and hatred against my person. Which I take the worse from you as being done not onely to a fellow-Christian, and a fellow-Protestant, but also to a fellow-Minister of the Gospel, whose life and labours are not very obscure; yea to a fellow-Covenanter, and one with whom you ate bread at his and others invitation, out of the desire I had to hold amity with you, and the Churches from whence you came. w Bewdley in Worcestershire, July 22, 1647" 15.—Opus Historicum et Chronologicum. 1668. 1. " Operis Historici et Chronologici Libri Duo ; In quibus Historia Sacra et Profana compendiose deducitur ex ipsis fontibus, a creatione Mundi ad Constantinum Magnum, et quaestiones ac dubia Chronologica, quae ex utroque Testamento moveri solent, breviter & perspicue explicantur & vindicantur. Sacrae Theologise Studiosis dictati in Academia Glasguenis vol. i. 0c APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. II. Anno clo Ioc l. & aliquot sequentibus. Per D. Robertum Baillium, SS. Theologize ibidem Professorem primarium. Una, cum tribus Diatribis ibidem dictatis, quarum prima est de Hsereticorum autocatacrisi; Secunda, An quicquid in Deo est, Deus sit; Tertia de Praedestinatione. Amstelo-dami, apud Joannem Janssonium. Anno clo Ioc lxiii.-" Folio, Collation, pp. [xx.] 307 & 155. The dedication by the publisher, " Sereniss. &c. Principi, Frederico Guilielmo, Dei gratia Marchioni Branclenburgico, &c." is dated " Amstel. xvi Novembris 1662. Sereniss. Oelsitudinis tuse cultor humillimus Joannes Janssonius." This is followed by " Judicia Virorum clariss. de Auctore et ejus Opere Historico-Ohronologica,—11 1st, by Gisbertus Voetius, S. T. P.; 2d, Joannes Hoornbeeck, T. P., addressed to William Spang; and 3d, by Georgius Hornius. 2. The copies remaining unsold were republished with new title pages, and the addition of an Index. An engraved title bears, " Roberti Baillii opus Historicum et Chronologicum. Amstelodami, apud Johannem a Someren. Anno 1668. W. Jansen Binneman sculp.'" This is followed by a printed title, " Operis Historici et Ohronologici Libri Duo ; In qui-bus, &c. (as above, the words " ex utroque Testamento,11 being changed to " ex V. & N. Testamento and the two lines u Sacrze Theologiae Studiosis, &c." omitted). Una, cum tribus Diatribis, quarum &c. (as above). Per D. Robertum Ba[i]llium, SS. Theologize ibidem Professorem primarium in Academia Glasguensi. Accedit nunc primum Index Generalis turn locorum S. Scripturse quam Rerum & Verborum locupletis-simus. Amstelodami, apud Joannem a Sommeren, Anno clo Ioc lxvin." This new Index occupies six leaves. 3. Another edition of the work was published at Basel, in 1669, folio ; and in Watfs Bibliotheca Britannica, an edition of the Three Dissertations subjoined to the work, is said to have been printed at Amsterdam, 1664, 8vo. 16.—Letters and Journals. 1775. 1. " Letters and Journals, written by the deceased Mr. Robert Baillie, Principal of the University of Glasgow. Carefully transcribed by Robert Aiken. Containing an impartial account of public transactions, Civil, Ecclesiastic, and Military, both in England and Scotland, from 1637 to 1662 ; a period, perhaps, the most remarkable that is to be met with in the British History. With an account of the Authors Life prefixed : and a Glossary, annexed. Vol. I. (and II.) Edinburgh : printed for W. Gray, Edinburgh ; and J. Buckland, and G. Keith, London, mdcclxxv.11 2. The above title, in many of the copies, was cancelled, and the following substituted:— " Letters and Journals : containing an impartial account of Public Transactions, Civil, Ecclesiastical, and Military, in England and Scotland, from the beginning of the Civil Wars, in 1637, to the year 1662 : a period, perhaps, the most remarkable and interesting in the British History. Now first published from the MSS. of Robert Baillie, D. D. Principal of the University of Glasgow, who was actively concerned in those transactions. With the Life of the Author, and a Glossary. In Two Volumes.No. II.J APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR, ci Vol. I. (and II.) Edinburgh: printed for William Creech and William Gray. Sold, in London, by J. Buckland, G. Keith, and Messrs. Dillies. mdcclxxv." 2 vols. 8vo, Collation, pp. viii. 456 and 466. See page ix. of the preface, for some notice of this edition. In addition to the above works, various tracts have been ascribed to Baillie, either under erroneous titles, or such as were circulated only in manuscript. Among these are " Queries anent the Service Book," in 1638 ; " The Question of Episcopacy discussed from Scripture and the Fathers," in 1641; and a " Reply to the Modest Enquirer,11 1651, this last being evidently his " Unlawfulness of Limited Episcopacy," 1641, quoted under a different title, and a mistaken date. But Baillie assisted in the publication of the writings of others, more especially of two of his predecessors. 1. He appears to have had some concern in completing the posthumous work by Robert Boyd of Trochrig, Principal of the University of Glasgow, and, for a short time, of Edinburgh, entitled " Roberti Bodii a Trochoregia Scoti, S S. Theologise in Academiis Salmuriana, Glascuana, et Edinburgena Professoris eximii, in Epistolam Pauli Apostoli ad Ephesios Prselectiones supra CC." &c. Londini, 1652, folio. Prefixed to. the work is a preface or dedication by the authors son, John Boyd of Trochrig; this is followed by Dr. Andrew Rivet's " Epistola de Vita, Scriptis, Moribus, et foelici exitu Roberti Bodii," &c. addressed to William Spang, and " Ad Lectorem Epistola," signed R. B. and dated " Glasguse, Idibus Sextilis, 1651." This last, containing some recollections of Boyd, was written by Baillie ; and the Author's son refers to these communications in the following terms :— " De Auctore ad aliorum provoco judicia. Doctissimo Riveto, cujus nomen in Ecclesiis usque adeo eelebre est, ut intime cognitus, ita arctissimo amoris nexu conjunctissimus. Robertum Balliolum, virum doctum pariter, et modestum, discipulum habuit, qui multa et ipse observare, et ab aliis ob-servata ab ipsismet haurire poterat, utpote qui jam in Academia Giascuensi Theologiae Professoris munere fungitur. Horum Epistolas legat qui scire volet Quis et Qualis fuerit Robertus Bodius." 2. To the posthumous Commentary on the Book of the Revelations, by James Durham, Lond. 1658, folio, Baillie furnished a short commendatory Epistle. This will be found reprinted in the present work, vol. iii. p. 583. 3. Baillie acted as literary executor to Dr. Strang, in the publication of his posthumous writings. Of this learned divine, the best account is contained in Chambers's Biographical Dictionary ; but a brief outline of his life may be here given. John Strang, born in 1584, was a native of Irvine, of which parish his father was minister. In early life he was brought up by his stepfather, Robert Wilkie, then minister of Kilmarnock ; and when 12 years of age, was sent to St. Leonards College, St. Andrews, where he was placed under the care of his kinsman, Principal Wilkie. In due time (in 1613), he became minister of Errol; in 1617, he had the degree of D.D. conferred on him at St. Andrews, at the time of King James's visit to Scotland ; and,cii APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. II. in 1626, he was translated to Glasgow as Principal of the College. His conduct at the General Assembly in 1638, exposed him to the suspicion of the Presbyterian party; but through the influence of his friends, both on that and subsequent occasions, he escaped censure, when his orthodoxy, in some points, was unjustly called in question. He was induced, however, to resign his office as Principal, (retaining his salary), on the 19th April 1650, and devoted the latter period of his life to revising his works for the press. He died at Edinburgh, on the 20th June 1654, in the 78th year of his age, (vide vol. iii. p. 251.) His Testament is dated 21st March 1654 ; and he names " Mr. Robert Baillie, Professor of Theologie in the College of Glasgow,11 as one of the advisers to his executors ; and adds, " I recommend to the said Mr. Baillie the caire of revising and printing my treatises, De Judice Controversiarim et Perfectione Scripturce; Item, De Providmtia seu Voluntate Dei circa Peccatwm; and for that effect I lieve to him the soume of one thousand pundis to advance the printing thereof and should this sum be insufficient, his executors were enjoyned to supply the deficiency. Of these works the first published was entitled " De Voluntate et Ac-tionibus Dei circa Peccatum, libri IV.11 Amstelodami, 1657, 4to. The MS. was sent by Baillie to Spang, and was edited by Alexander Morus. A considerable delay occurred in the publication of his other work, which contained a Life of the Author, written by Baillie hi 1657, but not published till twelve months after his death: viz. " Tractatus de Interpretation et Perfectione Scripturae, cum Autoris Vita, et Opusculis Varus" Roterodami, 1663, 4to. It will be observed, from Baillie's own Testament (p. lxxxviii.) that 500 merits of the money that had been left to him by Dr. Strang was still unpaid; and in the interim, having married one of his daughters, for his second wife, Baillie leaves this sum to her as a special bequest. No. III. LIST OF BAILLIE'S MANUSCRIPTS. I.—Letters and Journals. 1637-1662. 1. As stated in the Preface, the Original MS. forms 3 vols. 4to., in the possession of the Church of Scotland, having been purchased by order of the General Assembly in 1737. The six leaves at the beginning of the First Volume are lost, and cannot be supplied from any of the transcripts. Fol. 7 commences with the fragment of a letter, dated August 1636, and the volume ends on fol. 380, with the letter dated 26th July 1643. The Second Volume contains 280 leaves, and ends with October 1647. The Third Volume contains 303 leaves, and ends with May 1662. There are at the end of this volume a number of blank leaves, some of which are occupied by various detached notices gleaned from the MS. itself, (but with references to the pages of the transcript in 1701,) in the handwriting of the Author's grandson. 2. The first complete transcript of this MS. was apparently the copy that was made, under the direction of the Author's grandson, in the year 1701, and which, as has been elsewhere stated, remained for more than a centuryNo. III.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. oiii in the possession of the family. It is now the property of the Rev. Thomas M'Orie, Edinburgh. This copy is in 4 volumes folio, the first vol. being bound in two parts ; and is slightly injured with damp. 3. From this transcript in 1701, a similar copy in 4 volumes folio, was made between 1720 and 1730 for the Rev. Robert Wodrow; and was purchased for the sum of i?10 from his executors, for the Library of the Church, by authority of the General Assembly, 17th May 1740. 4. From the same transcript, another copy in 3 vols, folio, was made for the Library of the University of Glasgow. From the College Records, 19th April 1768, and 17th of May 1769, various sums were ordered to be paid to Robert Aitken for transcribing it; and he evidently was the same person whose name appears on the title-page of some copies of the printed edition of the Letters in 1775. 5. The copy of the first volume, in folio, in the Museum of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland was probably also made from the transcript 6. According to a description of the Harl. MS. No. 6004, folio, pp. 212, obligingly communicated by Sir Frederick Madden, it appears that the volume contains only partial selections or extracts, rather than copies of entire letters ; and was no doubt made from the 1st volume of the 4to MS. previous to the complete transcript in 1701. The Original MS., as already stated, is unfortunately imperfect at the beginning, wanting the first six leaves. On the last page, the author's grandson has commenced a partial index as follows :— " To Mr. Spang, 1636, [fol.] 1.—To Mr. A. Cunningham, 2.—To Robert Liviston, ibid.—[To] Mr. Jo. Bell, 3.—Mr. Spang, ib. 5. —Elizabeth, ib.—Sr. Ja. —Mr. W. , 7. —Mr. Spang, ib.—The Archbishop of Glasgow, 11, Sec."" The difficulty of decyphering Baillie's own hand, in which the earlier letters probably were copied, no doubt occasioned these blanks in th& names, and prevented the earlier leaves from being copied by the transcriber in 1701. The following is a fragment of the letter marked as to " Sir Ja. (blank.)1' The references it contains to a work by Archbishop Usher, entitled " Gotteschalci et Prsedestinationae Controversise ab eo motae, Historia," &c. Dublinii, 1631, 4to, suggest the probability that this letter was addressed to Sir James Fullerton, at Dublin. The next letter to " Mr. W.11 is that to Mr. William Wilkie, of which a facsimile is given at page 1 of this edition. Fragment of a Letter in Baillie's MS. fol. 7- he speks so much to his honoure and comendation of his story as does greatlie further the fore of insinuation which that book hes without so great a testimonie from so divin a mouth, this autoritie is laid first in our dish by our adversares when we would but mute against Vossius. It's treu his " Goddescalcus" does evinc the errour of Vossius in his manifold calumnies of that poor man and all the race of the imaginarie predesti-narians. Also that heer and ther Vossius other aberrationes ar pointit atciv APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. III. in that treatis, but shall it be aneugh when you have putt in our hand ane intoxicat cup with great comendatione of the win[e] therein, to point at a stern or tuo of black venome souming heer and ther, at the syds and in the mids. I verily think that the mor then ordinarie favour and honor which that grit Divin did sheu to that man, sine it hes not movit him to retreit to this hour any passage of his book, which yit by his own seld promise I heir he was oblidget to doe, but contrariwayes hes confirmit greatly these louers of his errours. Thir favours and honours, I say, being so abusit ar treu obligations to move if not to inforce that primat of our worthyes to imploy in Causa Dei, as some hunder yeirs sine it is rightly stilit, thes singular endeuments which God hes putt within, with ane great store of outward most fitt materialls, which much labour hes laid to his hand without. Reddily his late retyretnes from state affaires mor then one could be permittit to his place, is a benefit sent to him by God through the handes of his small freinds, for this intention that the houres of his laser being increasit, they mey be imployit in this or the lik task. If he could not be movit to resume the hole historie of Pelagius, nor yit to oppose expressily in any severall booke the whole errours of Vossius, yit glad would I be if in some of his neu treatises by occasion he would cleir the mind of antiquitie in thir tuo points at leist, the regeneration of baptisit infants, and the perseveranc of the regene-rat, if antiquitie be clearly against us in thes points, as in my small lecture, it is not yit if it be as Vossius would have it, without doubt it were our good to knou it certainly, that we might heer, as in some other quaestiones, leave antiquitie in a Catholick corruption, and stand by sole scripture our best ground. This was the passage of our conference which I intreatit you to remember, and you were willing by my lettre to be holden in mynd of. If you could be pleasit to remonstrat this matter in your own language and rasunes, which ar of a farr other strain and persuasive efficacie then any thing I can say, I would be hopfull of your successe, and upon it I could weel assur you had done a servic which would tend to the glory of God, to the good of his Church, to the honour and farder reputation (if farder mey be then alreddie is purchasit) of that most eminent and great man, and also, which I hope to you is not a simple nothing, to my verie great joy and contentment. This is your humble and verie much obligit servant, Kilwinnin, Ag. 29, 1636. R. Baillie. II.—Adversaria and Miscellaneous Papers. I. A volume, small 8vo. pp. 309, in the possession of the Rev. Thomas M'Crie, Edinburgh. From the dates in several parts of the volume, it appears to have been written while Baillie was a student at Glasgow, in the years 1620, 1621, and 1622. A great portion of it consists of Latin extracts, Notes of lectures and sermons, written very neatly indeed, but in a hand not easily legible; while the words are so contracted, and miscellaneous notices are introduced without any break, and in such an uncouth orthography, as often to be quite unintelligible. II. A thick volume in folio, also in Mr. M'Orie's possession, neatly written, and containing the following articles, several of which, it will be observed, are transcribed into Baillie's collection of Letters and Journals : (See vol. ii, pp. 427f, 428).No. III.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. cv 1. " A Conference by Letters with a Canterburian Minister anent the Arminian tenet of the Saints Apostasies—The First letter is dated Glasgow, 28th May 1634. The Second letter, Kilwinning, 10th of Julie 1634.—Another Second letter, Kilwinning, 1st of Januar 1635, p. 15.— The Third letter, Kilwinning, 9th of June 1635, p. 33.—" My Fourt letter was marginall nots on the reply to my thrid letter," p. 53.—" The Fift letter, continuing and ordering the Conference,11 is dated Kilwinning, 22d Sept. 1635, p. 56.—" The Sixt letter, concerning the nature of Heresie and self-condemnation,11 has no date, p. 58.—" The Seventh letter, per-sewing the former purpose of Hseresie and self-condemnation,1'' p. 62. It has no date, and begins with " Ane Apologie for my prolixitie,11—" my ordinar fault,11 and ends on page 67. 2. " Diatriba prooemialis in publicis Academise comitiis recitata, cum Theologice professionem auspicares, de Hsereticorum Autocatacrisi.11 In the MS. Baillie has altered the two words in italics to Theologicas Prelectiones, and added the date, Anno 1642. Jul. 6. p. 68.— 3. " The mater, and the verie words of the Eighth letter, almost without change, were turnit into " Diatriba de Dei simplicitate, num quic-quid in Deo est, Deus sit, contra Vorstium et Socinianos.11 p. 76.—" This nixt letter is anent the head of Predestination.11 p. 96, and ends on p. 135. " So I rest your loving freind, R. Baylie.11 Kilwinnin, Jul. 4,1637. 4. These two dissertations are printed along with his " Opus His-toricum et Chronologicum,11 1663, as " Diatriba Prima11 and " Secunda.11 5. " Duorum studiosorum de Geniculatione, quam vocant, per literas Collatio.11 p. 137. " A Peaceable Consideration of a Paper against Kneeling;11 p. 152. and at p. 157. " The Reasons of the Paper Ansuered.11—" A Freindlie Conference betuixt two Ministers, D. and B. anent the posture of Communicants in the act of receiving the holie Elements of the Lord's Supper.1' p. 158.—" The Second Reply for the former Five Reasouns.11 p. 185.— " The first letter of B. to D.11 [in regard to Kneeling,] is dated Nov. 24, 1634. p. 202.—" The second letter of B. to D.11 has no date. p. 204. " The third letter of B: to D.11 dated 12th Deer. p. 205.—" The fourt letter of B. to D.1? is signed " The Lord be with you, most loving Brother, your Brother, R. Baillie.11 Jan. 2, [1635.] p. 206.—" The fift letter of B. to D.11 also signed R. Baillie. p. 209. 6. " An Ansuer to ten Arguments for the necessitie of Table Gesture in the act of Receiving.11 p. 210.—These Arguments, Replies, Answers to the Replies, &c. are continued to page 373. The last 3 pages, containing " A Consideration of your Ansuer to my last replie for my fyve Arguments,11 is signed " Your Brother, R. Baillie. Kilw. Feb. 8, 1636.11 7. " Letter to Mr. John Rae.11 June 14, 1643; but at the end p. 375, dated Glasgow, June 9, 1643. Your loving Cousin, R. Baylie. Another letter, " For Mr. John Rae,11 without date. p. 379. and letters " For Mr. James Forsyth.11 March 8, 1643. p. 381. and—" For the same.11 April 11. p. 382. 8. " The summe of my Conference yesterday with three or four yeomen of my flock who refused to sing the Conclusion.11 p. 385. 9. " Commentariolus de prsecipuis Pontificiorum Erroribus."1 Praefatio, et cap. 1, ad cap. 17. p. 389. 10. " Parergeticorum Diatriba secunda, de Congregationum Independ-entia, seu de Presbyteriorum et Synodorum auctoritate.11 p. 431.cvi APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. III. 11. " Theses a Sacrae Theologiae studiosis diebus lunse hora locoque solitis discutiendse. De primariis Sectariorum erroribus, Independentia, Brounismo, Anabaptismo, Chiliasmo, Antinomia, Socinianismo, Erastian-ismo, Familiastis, Quserentibus, Anti-scripturariis, Atheis, &c." p. 445. No year is specified. These Theses are classed under 19 heads. 12. " Tractatus de formali causa Justificationis, seu potius de Justitia Ohristi imputata et Hominis inhserente. Lib. 1. Contra Pontificios.11 p. 459. This Treatise breaks off at page 497, at the end of chapter 7. The catch-word of that page being " cap. 8.11 At the other end of the volume, on reversing it, are :— 13. " Oratio in Academise Glasguensis Comitiis habita, a R. B. anno 1627. cum in Regentium numerum solenniter cooptaretur.—De Mente Agente." p. 1. 14. " Ex primariis Philosophise partibus Thesium Sylloge, de quibus cum bono Deo respondere conabimur, dignissimis viris Dominis Academise moderatoribus, quando et ubi ipsorum dignitatibus convenire videbitur.— Theses Logics,—Theses Metaphysicae, &c.11 p. 10. 15. " Oratio in Laudem Linguse Hebrseae, in Academise Comitiis dum promoverentur Ordines, anno cio ioc xxix, Recitata." p. 23, and ends on p. 30. On some of the blank leaves are inserted—" At Carnbrue, July 22, 1708, A list of R. B's books,11 consisting of 76 numbers in folio, 93 in 4to, 100 in 8vo., and 138 in 8vo. and infra. Also a List of Books lent, dated at Carnbrue, August 26, 1710. III. A similar Volume is preserved in the University Library of Glasgow. It is in quarto, and contains :— 1. " Oratio in Academise Glasguensis comitiis habita, a R. B. anno 1627, cum in Regentium numerum solenniter cooptaretur.—De Mente Agente,11 pp. 22. 2. " Opusculi Historici et Chronologici Libri Duo, In quibus His-toria Sacra et Profana compendiose deducitur ex ipsis fontibus, a Crea-tione ad mortem Joannis Evangelistae, et Questiones ac Dubia Chrono-logica, quae ex utroque Testamento moveri solent, breviter et perspicue explicantur, Prselecti Sacrae Theologiae studiosis in Academia Glasguensi, Anno 1650, et aliquot sequentibus,11 pp. 23 to 695. It will be apparent from the title that this portion of the volume is the same with Baillie's posthumous work, " Opus Historicum et Chronologi-cum r11 See p. xcix. 3. " Theses a Sacrae Theologise studiosis diebus lunae hora locoque solitis discutiendse. De primariis Sectariorum erroribus, Independentia, Brounismo, Anabaptismo, Chiliasmo, Antinomia, Socinianismo, Erastian-ismo, Familiastis, Quaerentibus, Anti-Scripturariis, Atheis,11 &c. 4. " Ex Primariis Philosophise partibus Thesium Sylloge de quibus cum bono Deo respondere conabimur dignissimis viris Dominis Academise moderatoribus, quando et ubi ipsorum dignitatibus convenire videbitur.11 On reversing the volume, we find— 5. " Parergeticorum Diatriba Tertia: Contra Vorstium et Sccinianos, Dei Simplicitatem, Divinorum Attributorum primum, evertentes.11 pp. 1-56. This is printed at the end of the " Opus Chronologicum,11 as " Diatriba Secunda, De Dei Simplicitate.11 6. " Parergeticorum Diatriba Quarta : De Episcopatu.11 pp. 57-171.No. II.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. cvii IV. " Commentariolus de praecipuis Pontificiorum Erroribus, (cap. i—xv)—Parergeticorum Diatriba.11 4to. pp. 82, in the University Library of Edinburgh,. AO. a. 6. This treatise is contained in the preceding No. II. of Adversaria. V. " A Discourse anent Episcopacie, intended for the late Generall Assemblie, proving from Scripture and Antiquitie this Office as hitherto it hath been taken and used in the Kirk of Scotland, and yet is required, to be unlavvfull; and answering the chiefe Scriptures and passages of Fathers that commonly are produced to the contrair; shewing also that Episcopacie, howsoever limitate, is so inconvenient for us, that by no meanes we ought to give our assent to the Reduction thereof.11 This paper is perhaps the same with " The Question of Episcopacy discussed,11 which Baillie left for publication- at London, in 1641. See pp. xcii.-xciii. It is preserved in the Advocates Library, Wodr. MSS. 4to, vol. xxxi. No. 5, and consists of 30 pages neatly written, (in the hand, I believe, of Charles Lumisden, son of the minister of Duddingston) with a few slight corrections in Bailee's own hand. It begins,—" Among all the Questions to be determined in the present Synode, there is none of greater consequence in the estimation of all men, than that of Episcopacie ; in all other articles there is some hope of mutuall condescending for the satisfaction of all,11 &c. Various passages in Greek and Latin are cited from the Fathers. III.—Lectures and Sermons. 1637-1652. There are two volumes in 4to, closely written, and wholly in Baillie^ own hand, in the Rev. Mr. M'Crie's possession. Both volumes are much injured by damp. They consist of Notes of Sermons and Discourses. The First volume, dated between August 1637 and June 1639, contains 166 leaves at the one end, and 118 leaves at the other end of the book, as numbered by Baillie. The Second volume extends from January 1648 to June 1652, on 475 leaves, an intermediate volume being lost. In the latter volume, while marking the date of delivering each Discourse after the text, he has occasionally made incidental allusions to passing events, or to matters in reference to himself. These notes, however, are so brief, and his own wretched orthography and handwriting are so peculiar, as often to be scarcely intelligible; Mr. Meek, however, with equal patience and ingenuity, succeeded in decyphering them ; and from his transcript the following notices are selected, as being those that refer to matters of public importance, or that furnish dates in regard to some local or personal events. 1648. 4. b. Heb. xi. 9.—March 26, 1648.—Eftir my 7 weeks absenc in Edinburgh at the Commission and Parlament. 8. b. Heb. xi. 11.—Glasgou, Apr. 16.—I preachit not the Sunday befor, being much distemperit befor & eftir my Sinod sermon with cold & weekness, & greif for the publict jarrings. 76 Fast, May 28, generall, for the danger of religion and countrie: Also the sojurs cam to Glasgou to force us to put out men. Notes on Ps. 80 ; repfeated] in Glasgou 1650, Sept. 27. VOL. I. pCYlll APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. H I 82 Joel 2, 17. Fast, July 1, Sunday; rep[eated at] Edr., [in Mr. Robert] Douglas1 church, at the Assembly. 118 b. Hos. 5. Fast befor the reneuing of the Covenant, Thursday, Dec. 14, 1648. 1649. 89 b. Thanksgiving for deliveranc of Glasgou from suord and pest, Thursday, Feb. 1, 1649, Ps. 107 notit on. 126 Hos. 12. Apr. 1, 1649, Hag. [at the Hague], in our hous, first Sunday. 127 Hos. 13. Hag. Ap. 8, 1649- 128 Hos. 14. Hag. Wednesday, Apr. 11. 102 b. Ps. 85, notit on. Saturday, 23 June, preparation to the Communion last [day] Glasgou, eftir my return from Holland; also befor the Parlam. 213 Amos 9, 5. Dec. 30, 1649, that day I preachit not for a fortnight, being unweel with cold and other distempers. 1650. 213 b. Obadia. Feb. 24, eftir my return from Edinburg, when Mr. David [Dickson] removit, and I fred, by my brethreen, from Holland. 192-221 Jona 3. Apr. 7. [March 31.] Fast for the treatie at Breda. 195 [At the end.] The lectour was on Jona 3, p. 221, being utterly on-able to speek for horsnes, all remedies usit, I venturt on God, and he helpit me through all my matter gratiously, blissit be his name ! On Saterday, a sermon only against a declining: little or nothing to the purpose in hand. Fornoon I stayit in, no sermon heir in Black-friers. I gott my personall sins confessit at large, especially my preid and grace to intreat for and belive pardone, all the publict sins as I concevit them. The King hertily prayit for, and the Treatie, the College, Principall, myself and familie ; the Lord good, blissit be his name! 197 b. Communion last day, Laigh Church. The first day, my Wyf de-liverit of Mary, May 5, I preachit all day in Blackfriars. 256 Heb. 12 19- May 27, 1650, eftir Ja. Graham's hangeing. 316 b. Ps. 79, 8. Sunday Sept. 8. Our army defeat at Dunbar, Sept. 3. Tuysday. 295 Ps. 102. notit on v. 19- Sunday, Sept. 8. After the defait of our army on Tuysday morning at Broksmuth, Sept. 3, sad weeping in my chalmer and familie; prayers divers tymes, yit herdnes and stupi-ditie much recurring. Feirs for neu divisions by the Association, excluding D[avid] Lesly, and all who be for, and going on for the ruining of the Army gathering again at Stirling. Mr. David [Dickson] for taking in all, but would not apeir; went to Inerary no Stirling; thought Lesly onfit, but no tratour. 318 Ps. 79, 8. Sept. 15. Sunday, General Fast eftir the defait of our Army; Cromweell being reddy to merch from Edinburgh to Glasgou or Stirling, to hinder our levies. 296 Notit Ps. 83. Sunday Sept. 15, 1650. Crumweel reddy to merch from Edinburgh to Glasgou, to stay the levies. 320 Ps. 79, 8. Sept. 22, 1650. Crumweel gone from Stirling, hovering at Lithgou, wither to go to Glasgou.No. III.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. cix 297 b Ps. 83. 9- Sept. 23. Crumweel risen from Stirling; hovering at Lithgou ; we in feir of cuming to Glasgou. 322 Jer. 10, 23. Sept 29. Crumweel said to be resolvit for Glasgou. Our Stat & Kirk advysing in Stirling wither to admit of Ingagers, & to join the West's Association with the forces at Stirling. 325 Jer. 10, 24. Sunday Oct. 6,1650. Crumweel recrutit at Edinburgh ; we yit sparit. 327. Jer. 10, 25. Oct. 27. Returnit from Cumrey, to & from which I & my sone gratiously convoy it. I fand all myn in peic. The English in Glasgou. No considerable hurt; extraordinarily civill by God's mercie. Strachan in a hands with a treatie; Mr. Patrick with a remonstranc from the Army. Middleton fell on Sr> J0- Broun and excommunicat: Crafurd & Lauderdaill acceptit the Act of Indemnity. Wlially to meet Stanford's forces at Carlil: amasit at the Remonstrance, and feirit knaverie of the most. 338 b. Jer. 14, 19. Nov. 10, 1650. Strachan laid doun. Middleton acceptit indemnity. Remonstranc not subscrivit. Randevous at Par-tik, for Stirling, callit by Car to Douglas. Argil doutit if for the Rem[onstrance]. 333 b. Jer. 14, 19. Nov. 17, 1650. Strachan laid doun. Remonstranc at Stirling. I sent for by A. Ker. Parlament at Perth on the 20. 1651. 335 b. Jer. 14, 19.—Jan. 19, [1651.]—Remonstranc condemnit by Church and State. Strachan excommunicat, King crounit, Comission allouit a generall receving to the Army. Gutrie from Stirling, Gilespy from Glasgou, Cant from Aberdeen, sent dissents. Castle of Edinburgh betrayit. Eftir 8 weeks silenc I returnit from S. Johnston. 338 Jer. 14, 19.—Jan. 26, [1651.]—All in quietnes befor a storme, but eftir grit din for our election of Mr. R. Ramsey Professor; Comissar [LockhartJ, slidery; M. Zach. [Boyd] a reid [bending] with any wind ; [George] Yong, oak. 339 b. Jer. 14,21. Feb 2, 1651. Eftir conferenc at Dumbartan with Argil, Dik [Dickson], &c. 341 b. Jer. 14, 21.—Dumbartan jurney had given such a cold and flux, that all the former week I keepit in; also busy on my Chronologie, and the enemie in toun, in their way to Stirling, till Saterday, so I preachit non on Sunday. This week vexit with Mr. Patrik about Mr. J. Duram's busines and his papers against the Comission, yit helpit in all by God, thought ill lookit on by the faction for my protestation. 345 Jer. 14, 22. Mart. 2, 1651. The King at Aberdeen to help the ministers retardment. A motion among people in the West feirit, through the papers & preachings & action of som[e] Highlands lying still. 347 b. Jer. 17, 12, Mart. 9. King going on with his Northern levies : and we in grit peic expecting shortly a grit storme. 370 Jer. 17. 12, 1651, Mart. 16. King bak at Perth, army gathering but slouly. A word of Crumweel's death, Sabath, March 9, when I within praying for the King, and against him. 370 b Jer. 17, 13, Mart. 23, 1651. King in Parliament. Rumours of Crumweers miserabill dath continuing. Gentilmen on Clid taken.cx APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. I]J. 372 b. Jer. 17, 13. Mart. 30, 1651. All my letters aunsuerit from Perth. Kirk warnings against dividers of Kirk and State ample. Midleton ready on a march. Parliament jangling. Crumweel yet hangit himself as Judas in Lon[don (] Jer. 17, 13, Apr. 6, 1651. Eglintoun taken at Dumbarton. Sinod rent by Mr. P[atrik]. Argil protestit against the councell. Duram violent for his place. Mr. Zacharie [Boyd] diing. We threatenit to be taken. Jer. 17, 14, Apr. 13, 1651. King bak from Stirling to Perth, on the discovery of his desing on Hamiltoun. Argil did not sitt in the comittie, non of his men sturring ; grit feir of treachery. Apr. 20, 1651. Crumweel at Hamiltoun, on his way to Glasgou. A good aunsuer from Douglas. Argil su*pectit: divisions yit grouing, and feires. Jer. 17, 13. Eph. 2. 20. Apr. 27. The former Sunday I preachit no. Crumweel in Glasgou ; herd befor no[o]n, Mr. R[obert] R[amsay] ; eftirnoon, Mr. J. Carsters and Mr. Ja. Duram. Conferenc on Wedensday. Armies both making reddy. Jer. 17. 17. May 4,1651. Crumweel away from Glasgou towards Edinburgh, by Carnwath. Tumult betuix Councel and Commonalitie on Wednesday. 301 b. Jer. 17. 17. May 11, 1651. Foot coming to a leger at Stirling. On the agreement of our Counsell with the Commonalitie to my power; speks with M. Ja. Duram, Jo. Gram, and Jo. Bell. 228 b: Ps. 32, notit, June 8, 1651. Leaguer at Stirling; Classit men in Parliament. Fast indictit for tuo Sundayes follouing. Ramsey callit to be Principall. 232 Jer. 13, 16, 17. Being sent to Perth for Mr. R. Ramsay's call [to be Principal], at my going, the table fell on my legs, and my wyfes, to our pain but no grit hurt. Befor my return Rob. fell in a dangerous fever. I settled to Mr. Ja. Duram 200 p[ound]. I was no evill instrument in our Remonstranc of dissatisfaction for the Comittie of Estates, and desires for deiling tenderly with the Westerne Remon-strantes: delt in both with Laderdaill and the Duke, and yit with Mr. Blair and Douglas, that they sould not be injurious. Was grivit with the King's jurney to Dumferling. Whill within a myl of Glasgou, I am thinking of the difficultie of taking up God, a Infinit Spirit, and the goodnes of God, who had given us the Sun and Moon, to fessen our week scatterit thoughts on him ; whil I am thinking on the man Christ in his thron of glory in Heaven, among angels and saintes, my hors falles and bruisis my arme and legg sore, so that I could not preach as I purposit; this, with Rob's danger, and the Army's hazard, being shortly to march, humblit my spirit. Chancelorfs] vyle scandall with Major Jo[hnston's] wyfe, on Wedensday befor fast. Jun. 29. 1651. 236 Jer. 13, 16, 17. Jul. 6. After the armies had skirmisit at Lerber bridg. Mr. Wil. Strang died on Sat. morning painles. 239 Ez. 9- 6. Jul. 13. Crumweel having liftit from Torewood, came on Saterday to Lithgou, at night to Shots, on Sunday at eleven to Shet[l]stoun ; all our Kirks brak up. Mr. R. R. and his being hardly escapit: I stayit, but keepit in. Mr. Pat. preachit efter noon, and on Monunday, ill and off'ensivly. Crumweel put his tents round about our toun ; ludgit in Minto's, distroyit barbarously cornea 374 376 378 366. 380No. III.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. cxi and yeardes; oversau plunder. No man troublit me. The King came to Kilsyth, so Crumweel merchit bak on Saterday, to our joy. 261 b. Heb. 12. 22. 23. Agust 1651. I a herd jurney home from Dundy, Amos 7. 5. Generall Assembly deposit M. P. Gillespy. King in Ingland, Inglish in Stirling, S. Johnston, Bruntiland; Crafurd, Glencarn, Balcarras, Mershell, intrustit; Argil, Chanceler, Lothian, Calender, Lithgou, lying by ; Kintal, Ogilbie, Athol, reddy. Hudge feires and dangers. 267 b. Agust 81, 1651. No more word from the King. Munk befor Dun-die. M. R[obert] Ramsey diing gratiously. Fast for the King. Ps. 40. 11. 271. Sept. 7, 1651. M. R[amsay] deid on the Thursday at night. Generall [Leslie, Earl of Leven] Mershell, Ogilby, Crafurd, M. R. Douglas, Smith, Hamiltoun, Lae ^Law], Sharp, Pitillo. And. Ker, prisoners. King at London; Strang mixtur. M. P. Gilfespie's] wyf diing. Ps. 40. 12. 274 b, Sept. 14, 1651. Dundy taken by storme ; levies in the South scat-terit. Mr. P. Scarp [Scharp] buried ? A grit word of the King's totall rout at Worster. M. Ja. Duram callit to Ramsey's place. 276 b. Jhon. 14. 1. September 21, 1651. King defait, Duk [Hamilton], Laderdaill, etc. taken. 279 Jo. 14. 2. Sept. 28. King lurking ; Duk Ham. deid. Sequestrators cuming. Pat. Gil. and Rutherford in Glasgou, about the calling of ane Assembly. Our greives and dangers grit, and to men disperat. 418 Jo. 14 17. Nov. 2, 1651. Buckingham, and we hope the King, in Holland. Frequent meetings in Glasgou, and Fasts, for agreing with the Inglish. 473 b. Dec. 9, 1651. Needles[s] to conferr, sine no good at S. Andros, & Mr. Dik no come ; yit willing to heir what shall be offerit, & eftir a 14 night tell our mynd : To knou if they will stand to ther Commission, and will hinder, wher they have pouer, opposits to be chosen ministers, elders, magistrates ? If they will alou ingaging & actin onder the Inglish ? Give over praying for the King, and against our oppression I Advyse with Bell & Fergushill, what about Principal & Professour? what about the Inglish If silent; if they will keep a Commission I if they will separat { if keep a Synod { whou to keep Irwin & Air Presbitery right ■ what about admissions. At meeting agre to trouble so feu as may be; & non without a formall process, to be agreit on in the nixt Assembly. No jurisdiction for hurt in Comittee for visitation, if controversie about the King, first & last, might be laid asid. If baptisme and prayers, why not communions to Magistrats & to Elderships. The shamfull abus of base elders to be helpit. If a feu will not be reulit, brek off' with them in tyme and ther adherents : the longer the worse. Sie whou other, Colin, Ramsey, Drummond, can be accommodat. If D. Strang's put in. 428 Jo. 14, 20. Dec. 14,1651. In our conferenc I grauntit to[o] much, and almost intanglit to lay all asid, but all farder conferenc, referrit to Mr. J. Wood.cxii APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. IV. No. IV. Account of Mr. William Spang, Minister of ti-ie Scotish Church at campvere, and afterwards of the english congregation at Middleburg, in Zealand. The name of Spang is so intimately connected with that of his cousin, Robert Baillie, that some account of his life may be deemed a suitable addition to this work. The name itself is very uncommon, and deserves some consideration, from the connection with the noble family of Knox, Earls of Ranfurly. But Baillie's cousin was himself a man eminent as a scholar and divine, and merits a much fuller notice than I am able to present. The family of Spang towards the close of the sixteenth century were burgesses and citizens in Glasgow of some distinction. King James the Sixth, by a charter under the Privy Seal, dated at Holyroodhouse, 30th November 1599, erected the Physicians and Surgeons into a Faculty or Corporation, and by the 5th regulation, William Spang, Apothecary in Glasgow, was appointed one of the Visitors ; it being enacted, " That no maner of person sell any druggs, in the city of Glasgow, except the same be sighted by the saids Visitors, and by Wiiliam Spang, apothecary, under the pain of confiscation of the druggs.1'' (Charter printed in M'Ure's Hist, of Glasgow, p. 289, edit. 1737, 8vo. Gibson's Hist, of Glasgow, p. 301. Glasg. 1777, 8vo.) In 1605 and 1606, William Spang was Deacon and Visitor of the Incorporation of Surgeons and Barbers in Glasgow. (Cle-lands Annals, vol. i. p. 454); and he probably died about 1608. In George Crawford's MS. Genealogical Collections, it is stated that " this Mr. William Spang married Christian Hamilton, of the house of Silvertonhill, then an ancient family of the name of Hamilton, and Barons of a good estate in the shyre of Lanark, and in the royalty of Glasgow : they were Lords of the barony of Provend : they were come of an immediate son of the noble and illustrious house of Hamilton. His son was Andrew Spang, who was bred to trade, and thereby acquired a great stock and estate in money. His wife was Mary Buchanan.1'1 (vol. ii. pp. 137, 138.) From two passages in Baillie's Letters, it appears that Andrew Spang was alive in January 1637 (vol. i. p. 10), but was dead in October 1638 : for he says, " The last tyme I was in Glasgow, as my custom alwayes is, I went and saw your Mother, when I fand your Father was flitted; and not only by her, but sundrie of my friends, I was assured of his most christian and comfortable carriage and discourse to his very last, to the great contentment and joy of all: yea, and I could not wish to die with more faith. Your Mother also had good courage and health.11 (vol. i. p. 109.) Mrs. Spang was alive in March 1648. (vol. iii. p. 32.) In what manner the Spangs and Baillies were related I have not been able to ascertain ; but I am inclined to think that a mistake has been committed in naming Andrew Spang1 s wife, Mary Buchanan instead of Gibson. If so, it is most probable, she was a daughter of Henry Gibson, consequently she would be Baillie's aunt, and William Spang, his cousin-german. That Baillie was related to Spang, on the mother's side, may be inferred, not only from the visits he paid to Spang1 s mother, who resided in Glasgow, but from the mention he makes of the death of Nanny Gibson, whom he styles " our cousine,11 (vol. iii. p. 436.)No. IV.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. cxiii The family of Andrew Spang consisted of at least two sons and two daughters. The elder son, Andrew, was in the array. According to Lodge's Peerage of Ireland, by Archdall, the father of Colonel Spang was " Monsieur Spang, a Danish gentleman, who came to England in the suit of Queen Anne, consort to King James VI." (vol. vii. p. 198.) " He and his sons, (it is added, but with equal inaccuracy,) returned to Denmark; the elder served in Sweden as a Colonel of horse, and died Governor of Elbing; and the second, who was a divine at Delph in Holland, was eminent in the commonwealth of learning, and wrote a history of the Civil Wars in Britain.11 What is here stated respecting Colonel Spang1s service .abroad, may be quite correct; but his brother William was never settled at Delph or Delft, and it is doubtful if he ever visited Denmark. That Baillie's cousin was brother of the Colonel, appears from the fact that, on the 25th of May 1655, " Mr. William Spang, Minister at Middleburgh in Zeland, obtained a service as nearest agnett, that is, kinsman on the father's svd, to Hannibal Spang, son to Collonell Andrew Spang. (Inquis. Retorn. de Tutela, no. 121.) And on the same day, Hannibal Spang was served heir of Andrew Spang, merchant burgess of Glasgow, his guidsir [or grandfather.]—(Inquis. Generates, no. 4021.) Of the daughters of Andrew Spang, Margaret was married to Robert Caldwell, and her sons William and John, are no doubt the nephews of William Spang, who are mentioned by Baillie, vol. iii. p. 382; and some of the family appear in the lists of the magistrates of Glasgow. An eik or addition to her Testament occurs in the Glasgow Commissariot Records, 11th August 1655. The other daughter, Elizabeth Spang, was married to Thomas Knox, merchant in Glasgow, son of Mark Knox of Ranfurly, by Isobel Lyon, and became mother of Thomas Knox of Dungannon, in Ireland, who died at an advanced age, after the year 1728. This " Bessie or Elizabeth Spang, daughter of Andrew Spang, a merchant of reputation, and a man of great wealth in the city of Glasgow : ifs reported (adds Crawfurd) to the honour of her memory, that she was a woman of consummate prudence, industry, and virtue.11 The succession of the family to the honours of an Irish Peerage may be found in Lodge (vol. vii. 198), under the title Knox, Lord Welles. William Spang, second son of Andrew Spang, was born at Glasgow, about the year 1607- He received the chief part of his education in his native city, having entered the College as a student of Philosophy in May 1622. In 1625, on completing his course, he took the degree of A. M.; and with the view no doubt of prosecuting his studies in divinity, he came to Edinburgh, where he appears to have had some relations settled as medical practitioners. There was a John Spang put in nomination as deacon of chirurgions, in 1633 ; and from the Kirk-session Records of St. Cuthberts, we find that a Mr. William Spang and Catherine Baillie had a son baptised James, on the 30th January 1620. This William Spang was probably the younger Spang1 s uncle; and the connexion may have had some influence in procuring for him an appointment (the date of which is not recorded) as a Doctor or Teacher in the High School. This office he held till the beginning of 1630 ; as on the 19th of February that year, the town-council admitted " Mr. Archibald Newton to be Doctor of the Hie School, in place of Mr. William Spang, now elected minister of Campheir,11 (Records, vol. xiv. p. 152.) Mr. John Forret, minister of theexiv APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. IV. Scotish Church at Campvere, who had recently returned from a visit to Scotland, died in September 1G29. A petition from the resident Scotish inhabitants " at their Staple Port in the town of Campheir,11 regretting the want of a pastor, and intreating to have " their Kirk plantit,11 was addressed to the Convention of Royal Boroughs ; and the Commissioners at a meeting on the 27th of January 1G30, u understanding of the literature, qualificatioun, and abilitie of Mr. William Spang, student in Divinitie,11 gave him the presentation, with a stipend of 800 guildings (about £67 sterling) with a free house, and " twenty pundis Flemish for making of his chairgis in transportation."" (Register of the Conventions, vol. v. f. 236.) At a general meeting of the Convention, 8th July 1G30, the proceedings regarding Spang were approved of; and a further sum of thirty pounds Flemish for his expenses, was granted, (ib. f. 248, 249.) On the 12th of February, the town-council of Edinburgh appointed two of their number to act with other commissioners from the Boroughs, who were " to deale with the richt reverend Father in God the Archebishope of Sanctandroes,11 —" for ressaiveing of Mr. William Spang in Sanctandroes to be minister at Campveir.11 (Council Records, vol. xiv. f. 152. See also 16th April and 5th May 1630, fol. 160 Si 162.) Spang, after his settlement in Holland, kept up his intercourse with his friends in this country; but very few of his letters are known to be preserved. In September 1638, he addressed a long letter to Mr. Henry Rol-lock, one of the ministers of Edinburgh, vindicating himself from the calumnies to which Baillie alludes, that had been circulated against his cousin as " a favourer of the unhappy novations obtrudet upon our Church, yea, and inclinable to Poperie in gross.''1 The original forms No. 55 in Wodrow's MSS. vol. lxvi, folio. I regret, however, that owing to its great length, this letter cannot be here inserted. It is signed, It was chiefly from Baillie1 s communications that Spang wrote an account of the affairs in Scotland, in 1637 and 1638, which was printed under the following title :— " Brevis et fidelis NarratioMotuum in Regno et Ecclesia Scotica, excerpta ex scriptis utriusque partis scitu dignissimis. Per Irinseum Philalethen.— Dantisci, Anno 1640." 4to. 35 leaves, not paged. The narrative in this treatise ends with October 1638. It was republished, as " Historia Motuum in Regno Scotle," with a Continuation to near the close of the year 1640. It has the following title :— " Rerum nuper in Regno Scotise Gestarum Historia, seu verius Com-mentarius, causas, occasiones, progressus horum motuum breviter et per-spicue proponens, simul cum synopsi concordue, quantum hactenus inita est. Excerptus ex scriptis utriusque partis scitu dignissimis, quorum primaria in Latinum sermonem nunc primum fideliter translata inseruntur. Per Irinseum Philalethen, Eleutherium.—Dantisci, Anno Domini 1641,11 small 8vo. pp. 576. On the 30th March 1640, Baillie refers to the first of these publications, which he calls " a storie in Latine,11 and says to Warriston,—" In my mynd, you would do well to cause Mr. H. Rollock, at least thank the Young man for his paines, and encourage him to put it to the presse: it will doe us good over sea.11 In October 1641, the General Assembly passed anNo. IV.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. cxv act, " ordaining Mr. Robert Baillie to write to Mr. William Spang, minister at Campvere, and Kirk-session thereof, willing them to send their minister and a ruleing elder, instructed with a commission to the next General Assembly to be holden at St. Andrews the last Wednesday of July 164£."" A letter to the same effect, addressed to Spang by Johnstone of Warriston, Clerk of the Assembly, is inserted in Yair's " Account of the Scotch Trade in the Netherlands," p. 231. Lond. 1776, 8vo. Spang appears to have been married after his settlement in Holland. Baillie, in a letter to him, in January 1637, says, he had sent him " half-a-gallon of our Glasgow water ; I will intreat you drink my service to your wife, assureing her that I did wish her all prosperities and " that she may have confidence of a long and vigorous life to her husband, who was born and brought up in so happie a citie where such livelie waters runnes in everie street." His wife died in the summer of 1647, (vol. iii. p. 16.) In 1652, a vacancy having occurred in the English congregation at Middle-burg, in Zealand, among those nominated, 29th September, to supply the place, we find the names of Mr. Baily in Scotland, Mr. Colvin residing at Utrecht, Mr. Patrick Forbes a minister to a regiment, with nine others; and that of Spang was afterwards added. On the 2d of October, Robert Paget, minister at Dort, and William Spang at Campvere, were alone put in nomination when the latter was unanimously chosen ; and on the 10th November, " This being the Lord's day, Mr. Max. Teeling, [Teelinck, minister of the Dutch Church at Middleburg,] after preaching from Hebr. xiii. 17, established Mr. William Spang as pastor, whose subject in the afternoon, was Romans xv. 20." (MS. Records.) Having again married, before September 1649, (vol. iii. p. 101,) he had several children ; mention being made of three daughters in September 1656 (vol. iii. p. 325,) while the names of three of his children occur in the Register of Baptisms, which also furnishes his wife's name, Anna Meese. The children were Buscardina, baptized the 4th of April 1655 ; William, in November 1657; and Andrew, 29th of March 1660. During Spangs incumbency, the English Church at Middleburg, was placed on the same footing as the Dutch Reformed Church in Zealand, by having the minister's stipend paid out of the public purse. He died on the 17th, and was buried on the 25th of June 1664. There is no monument erected to his memory. Spang rendered various services to polite literature. In particular, he acted as the editor of Dr. Arthur Johnstone's Latin Poems, printed in a small volume at Middleburg in 1642. The General Assembly on more than one occasion acknowledged the obligations under which the Church lay to him for his valuable services. He is commended for his learning by Dr. Andrew Rivet, in the life of Boyd of Trochrig, prefixed to his Commentary on the Epistle to the Ephesians, 1652; and by Hoornbeek, Professor of Theology at Leyden, in Baillie's posthumous work on Scripture Chronology. In an unpublished biographical work by John Quick, author of " Synodicon in Gallia Reformata," &c. 1692, who for a short time was minister of the same congregation at Middleburg, he refers to Spang, and says of his " Historia Motuum," &c. " It is a piece of good and clean Latine ; but he discovers himself in it, a most zealous champion of presbytery." It may be added, that his son, William Spang, who was born in 1657, studied at the University of Utrecht, for the ministry. Two Latin theological dissertations by him, in 1681, (in which, in reference to Middleburg, the place of his birth, he is styled Mediob. Zelandus,) were printed at the vol. i. qcxvi APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. IV. time ; the latter being dedicated to John Caldwell one of the magistrates and a merchant in Glasgow, and to Thomas Knox, merchant in Belfast, " consanguineis suis intimis.''' William Spang was elected minister of the English Church at Middle-burg, in 1682, but he did not long survive, as appears from th^ following notices; for which, as well as for many of the preceding particulars, I am indebted to the Rev. William Steven, D. D., late of Rotterdam, now of George Heriofs Hospital, and author of " The History of the Scottish Church, Rotterdam : To which are subjoined, Notices of the other British Churches in the Netherlands." Edinb. 1833, 8vo. 1682 July 12. Mr. Wm. Spang proponent (probationer), presently travelling in Holland, was unanimously elected Minister at Middleburg, nemine contradicente. - July 16. Approved of by Classis—and will pitch upon a day for the needfull proposition and examination 1682 August 23. This Lord's day, Mr. Snipe of Campvere, £tfter sermon, published 3d proclamation of the elected minister. " The minister came doun from the pulpit, and Mr. Spang kneeling before him, he laid his hands upon his head, ordaining him to be a minister of the Gospel, and confirming him in the pastoral charge of this congregation.'" In the afternoon Mr. Spang preached from 2 Cor. v. 20. 1683 May 6th. Mr. Spang died this day, and was buried on the 13th of May. Dr. John Gribius, an elder, and also his brother-in-law, was requested to arrange Mr. Spang1 s papers. No. V. NOTICES OF PRINCIPAL BAILLIE'S FAMILY. The accompanying Genealogical Table will exhibit the relationship of Robert Baillie, with several of the persons or families whom he mentions in the course of his correspondence. But a more detailed notice of his own descendents may be expected in this work. From the preceding Memoir, it will appear that Baillie was twice married. His first wife was Lilias Fleming, of the family of Fleming of Cardar-roch, in Lanarkshire. She died on the 7th of June 1653. Their children were two sons and five daughters, one of whom died in infancy. I. Robert Baillie was probably the eldest of the family; and if so, may have been born in the year 1633. When Baillie was in England, in 1640, he writes to his wife,—" put Rob to the School; teach him and Harie both some little beginnings of God's feare ; have a care of my little Lillie." He was educated at the College of Glasgow, having entered the 5th class in 1648; and having taken the degree of A. M., he continued to pursue his studies for the ministry. In 1654 he was anxious to obtain the appointment as Librarian in the College : " Our Bibliothecarie's place was but an honorarie attendence, without more charge; the bene-fite of it is, the dyet with the Regents, a good chamber, and some twelve pieces a-year," (vol. iii. p. 286) ; but through the influence ofPEDIGREE OF MR. ROBERT BAILLIE, PRINCIPAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW. HENRY GIBSON, Town-Clerk of Glasgow 1580, and Commissary 1592, D. HENRY GIBSON, Writer in Glasgow, Died in August 1649. ABIGAIL FORSYTH, Died in October 1649. ANNABELLA FORSYTH, Daughter of David Forsyth of Blackhill. ROBERT BAILLIE of Jerviston. B. 15 . . D. 16 . . GIBSON, ELIZABETH GIBSON, Married to Mr. John Baillie, Minister of Cambuslang. — GIBL ARCHIBALD FLEMING, of Ferine, Commissary of Glasgow. HELEN GIBSON, c THOMAS BAILLIE, Merchant, Burgess in ELIZABETH BAILLIE, SON, married to Mr. William Wilkie, minister of Govan. SIR WILLIAM FLEMING of Ferme, Commissary of Glasgow. LILIAS FLEMING, of Cardarroch, B. 16 . . D. 1653. IS MR. ROBERT BAILLIE, ^ Principal of the College of Glasgow. B. 1603. D. 1662. CHRISTIAN BAILLIE, B. 16 . . D. 16 . . and Relict of Dr. James Elliot. HENRY GLEN, Merchant-Buigess in Glasgow. B. D. 1655. ARCHIBALD ROBERTOUN, Third son of John Robertoun of Earnock. JAMES ROBERTOUN of Bedlay, Advocate, and a Senator of the College of Justice. B. D.1664. JOHN GLEN, See vol. iii. pp. 240, 242, 285. ROBERT BAILLIE, B. 1633 P D. 1658. S. P. See p. cxvi of MEMOIR. LILLIAS BAILLIE. B. 1634 P D. WILLIAM ECCLES of Kildonan, Minister of Ayr. D. 1690. HENRY BAILLIE of Cardarroch, Preacher. B. 1636. D. 1696. ROBERT ECCLES of Kildonan. See p. cxvii. HELEN BAILLIE. B. 1643. D. 16 See JAMES COLQUHOUN, ELIZABFJTH ftAILLIE. Merchant in Glasgow. B. 1648. — HAMILTON MARY BAILLIE. of Strathbane. B. 1650. D. 2e p. cxix. See p. cxix. WALTER BUCHANAN MARGARET BAILLIE. of Orchard, Lanarkshire. B. 1657. D. JOHN WALKINSHAW of Barrowfield. B. D. See p. cxxii of MEMOIR. See p. cxix. ftOBERT BAILLIE- of Carnbrue. B. 16 . . D. 1710. MARY BRISBANE, daughter of Dr. Matthew Brisbane. See p. cxviii.No. V.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. cxvii Gillespie, then Principal of the College, his desires were frustrated. Robert died unmarried, in the prime of life, on th? 25th of May 1658, to his father s " very sore and just grief: All who knew him (he adds) bore witness of his pietie, wisdom, and learning, above many his fellows."" (ib. p. 374.) II. Lilias Baillie was probably the second child, and born in 1634 or 1635. She is occasionally mentioned in these Letters ; and was married in the year 1656 or the beginning of 1657, to " a very good young man,'1 Mr. William Eccles, younger of Kildonan, who soon after became minister of Ayr. After the Restoration he was ejected from his charge by the Act of Glasgow, in October 1662. In 1669 he took the Indulgence, and we find his name mentioned as minister of the second charge in Paisley that year; but with the other Indulged ministers he was deprived of his license by the Privy Council, on the 30th January 1684. On the 20th February 1668, he was served heir of his father, John Eccles of Kildonan, Ayrshire; and obtained charters under the Great Seal, of the lands, 3d August 1669, and 2d December 1671. Having survived the Revolution 1688, when Presbytery was finally re-established, and the Episcopal minister of Ayr, Mr. Alexander Gregorie having been ejected, Eccles was restored to his former charge, after an interval of 26 years. He died in 1694, leaving an only son, Robert Eccles of Kildonan, who had a similar grant of the lands, 8th March 1695. He married Agnes, sister of Hugh Cathcart of Carleton; but dying without issue, he was succeeded by his cousin-german, Dr. William Eccles, a physician of some eminence in Edinburgh ; who died in October 1723. The subsequent history of the family of Eccles of Kildonan may be found in Douglas's Baronage, pp. 436-438. III. Henry Baillie, was born in the year 1636, as he is mentioned in November 1638, as then two years of age, (vol. i. p. 110.) Like his brother, he was educated at the College of Glasgow, being also intended by his father for the ministry. But in 1653, he changed his views, and resolved to adopt some mercantile employment, (vol. iii. p. 252; and for this purpose his father sent him to Holland where he remained for upwards of twelve months. He returned in December 1655, (ib. p. 294,) and reverting to his original purpose, he resumed his attendance at College, and took his degree of A. M. in the year 1656. Before passing his trials as a preacher, in order " to see some more of the world, and to fitt him to speak in publick," he accepted an appointment to reside as chaplain in the family of Sir James Dundas of Arniston, in 1659, (ib. pp. 382, 392) ; and in 1661, Baillie informs Spang, (with whom his son had been boarded, while in Holland,)—" My boy Harrie is now a preacher: God hes given him a good and sweet gift; I hope he shall doe well.'" (ib. p. 472). The changes in the Church that took place after the Restoration of Charles the Second, may have been the means of preventing Baillie from obtaining any permanent living; and it is supposed he spent some time in the North of Ireland, where one of his sisters was settled. In right of his mother he must have succeeded to the property of Cardarroch, from his being so designated in one of the deeds, to be noticed in briefly stating the succession of his family. Henry Baillie was married about the year 1672, and died before September 1696; but I am unable to state the name of his wife, and whether he left any family besides one son ;—cxviii APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. V (I.) Robert Baillie, was served heir, as only surviving son of his father, who is styled," quondam Magister Hendricus Baillie, Studens Divinitatis in Academia Glasguensi." This service took place on the 4th September 1696, in the presence of some of his relations, including Archibald Robertoun of Bedlay, William Walkinshaw of Scotstoun, Mr. Matthew Brisbane, Doctor of Medicine in Glasgow, James Col-quhoun and William Knox, merchants in Glasgow. In 1699, Robert Baillie married Mary daughter of Dr. Matthew Brisbane. In the Contract of Marriage dated 8th April that year, he is styled " Robert Baylie, only lawful son to umquhill Mr. Harey Baylie, preacher of the Gospel," and it bears to be with " the special advyce and consent of Mr. Francis Montgomerie of Giffen, William Baillie of Lamentone, John Crawford of Milntone, Mr. John Tran, one of the Regents of the College of Glasgow, and James Colquhoun, late balzie ther, his lawfull curators." One of the witnesses was John Walkinshaw of Barrow-field. In 1706, Baillie purchased the lands of Carnbrue, in the parish of Bothwell, which had given the designation to a family of the same name for at least upwards of two centuries, as appears from the title-deeds, (which were most obligingly put into my hands by Andrew Clason, Esq. Writer to the Signet.) It was by purchase therefore, .and not inheritance, that this property came into the possession of Principal Baillie's grandson; and on the 19th December 1706, was executed a Disposition by Alexander Baillie pf Carnbrue, with consent of Margaret Baillie his daughter, and Alexander Baillie, younger of Castlecarry her husband, in favour of Robert Baillie, lawfull son to the deceast Mr. Harry Baillie of Carrdarroch.1'' This Robert died at an early period of life, leaving one son;— (II.) Matthew Baillie, Esq. On the 12th February 1711, Mrs. Mary Brisbane or Baillie was appointed Tutrix Dative to her son Matthew Baillie, " filium legitimum quondam Roberti Baillie de Carnbrue." He died at Carnbrue on the 1st October 1752, (Scots Magazine,) and was succeeded by his son ;— (III.) Henry Baillie, Esq. who married Anne Munro ; by whom he had one son, and a daughter Mary Baillie. He died at Carnbrue on the 2d September 1771, and Mrs. Baillie, at Edinburgh, on the 22d March 1786, (Scots Magazine.) His son,— (IV.) Matthew Baillie, attained the rank of Lieutenant-General in the army. He was twice married. The contract of marriage with his first wife Agnes Ramsay, second daughter of William Ramsay of Barnton, Esq. was dated 26th December 1792 ; but a separation took place sometime before January 1803. His second wife was Elizabeth Boyes ; by whom he had four daughters who survived him. He died at Nice in Piedmont, on the 3d of May 1825, having sold the estate of Carnbrue a short time before his death. The eldest daughter, Anne Baillie, married Paul Racchia, now Lieutenant-Colonel of Engineers in the service of the King of Sardinia, and they reside at Turin. The second daughter is also married. The youngest died a few months after her father. IV. Baillie's next child was a daughter, born on the 20th of May 1641,No. Y.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. cxix the news of whose birth was communicated to him, on his return from England, (vol. i, p. 353.) There is no reason to doubt that it was this " very pretty child," whom he mentions as his youngest daughter, who died about June or July 1642. (vol. ii. p. 38.) V. Helen Baillie, was born in September 1643, as we may infer, from what he mentioned in vol. ii. p. 97, compared with what he says, in 1650, vol. iii. p. 436. After her fathers death, she was married to James Colqu-houn, a merchant burgess, and one of the magistrates of Glasgow. His name occurs as treasurer in 1658, and one of the baillies in 1659, 1662, 1663, 1670, 1674, and 1679. The name also appears in some of the deeds relating to Baillie's grandson in 1696 and 1699; but he might have been a son of that name ; as no attempt has been made to trace the descent of the family. VI. Elspeth or Elizabeth Baillie, the next daughter, was born before March 1648, (vol. iii. p. 41.) After her father's death, she is said to have married a Mr. Hamilton of Strathbane, in the North of Ireland; but nothing is known respecting the family. VII. Mary Baillie, the youngest daughter, was born in May 1650 {supra, p. cvii.) She was married, some years after her father's death, to Walter Buchanan of Orchard, in the parish of Hamilton. But I have not succeeded in obtaining any information respecting them. It may however be noticed, that one of Baillie's grand-daughters must have been married to a person of the name of Chalmers, as appears from the following entry in the Faculty Minutes of the College of Glasgow:— " Deer. 29, 1714. Upon a representation of the necessitous circumstances of Mr. John Chalmers, great-grandson to the late Mr. Baillie, sometime Principal here, the Faculty allows twelve pounds Scots to be given him.'" We are not called upon to commend the liberality of the Faculty, in holding a special meeting to consider the case of this poor man, and voting him the sum equal to twenty shillings sterling; but the vote itself is sufficient at least to shew that the young man's personal character was not disreputable. We now come to the second branch of Baillie's family. His first wife, Lilias Fleming, as elsewhere stated, died, after a lingering illness, on the 7th of June 1653. His cousin Spang having recommended him to marry again, he writes to him towards the end of 1655, as follows:.—" For marriage, I dare not yet meddle with it, till I see what the Lord will do, with my great hazard . . . praying for the King. If in this I were secure, it's like I would follow your example in a second marriage, albeit I know not yet the partie; but I trust in this the Lord will be mercifull to me." (vol. iii. p. 287.) On the 1st October 1656, Baillie married Helen Strang, one of the daughters of Dr. John Strang, Principal of the College of Glasgow, (supra pp. c, ci.) It has hitherto been stated, (and I have fallen into the same error, at p. lxxi of the Memoir, and in a foot-note to vol. iii. p. 368,) that she was the widow of Mr. Robert Wilkie, one of the ministers of Glasgow. On examining Dr. Strang's Testament, dated 21st March 1654, we find that his surviving family consisted of four daughters, namely (1) Helen, relict of Dr. James Eliot. (2.) Elizabeth, wife of Mr. David Fletcher,cxx APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. V. at that time minister of Melrose ; who conformed to Episcopacy, and was advanced to the Bishoprick of Argyle 1662 ; but who still continued to officiate as minister of Melrose till his death, in 1665. (3.) Margaret, wife of Mr. William Fergusson, younger of Ketloch, in Dumfriesshire, whose name appears in Wodrow among the sufferers under Episcopacy ; and (4.) Nicolas, who appears from her Testament, recorded 7th September 1676, to have died unmarried. Dr. Strang had a son William Strang, who was a regent in the College of Glasgow, but he predeceased his father, in July 1651. (supra, p. cix.) Dr. James Eliot was admitted colleague to Robert Wilkie, as minister of the Blackfriars Church, Glasgow, in 1633. His name occurs in the list of members of the High Commission, October 1634, (vol. i. p. 426;) and he was elected Dean of Faculty in the University of Glasgow, 23d April 1635. In December that year he was translated to be second minister of the North-east parish of Edinburgh; and the Council on the 6'th January 1636, directed 500 merks to pay the said Doctor for his translation. (Council Records, vol. xiv. pp. 36*2, 363.) But his compliance with the Bishops in using the Service-Book, and in joining with some of his brethren in declining the authority of the General Assembly 1638, rendered him very unpopular. The Assembly not being able to take up his case, he and these other ministers of the city were referred to a special commission, by an act on the 3cl December; and Baillie alludes to his own endeavours in his behalf. " The love I had to poore Dr. Eliot, who had not indeed declyned the Asseinblie, made me both plead myself and stir up Mr. R. Mel-drum and Eliezer Borthwick, his friends, to deal with Rothes and others, that the committee of Edinburgh should have power at farthest but to suspend and transport him, without deposition." (vol. i. p. 150.) This Commission had suspended him ; but at the Assembly 1639, when the reports were given in of their proceedings, 26th August, 41 Mr. John Row, and Mr. John Ker, who were appoynted to take notice of Doctor Eliot's case, reported, that they thought him to be a humble and modest man, penitent for any thing he has done, and submissive to the constitutions of the Kirk. The Assembly declares him to be capable of the ministrie, and to be provydit at the first occasion." (Peterkin's Records, p. 261.) On the 27th September 1639, the Town Council ordained the Kirk Treasurer " to pay Dr. Eliot his bygone stipends to Beltan last.1" (Council Records, vol. xv. p. 103.) He appears to have gone to England, and to have obtained some living there ; being evidently the person to whom Baillie refers, in a letter from London, to George Young at Glasgow 1st December 1646, when he says, " Commend me to the Principal: his daughter and her children are at their Church in the countrie. The extreme foulnesse of the weather has kept her Husband yet here: all are in good health." (vol. ii. p. 412.) He probably died about 1652. By Dr. Eliot, her first husband, Helen Strang had at least one son and two daughters: (I.) A son mentioned in Dr. Strang's testament, as he bequeaths one-sixth part of his books " to John Eliot, my oye" (grandson) ; and again, " I leave to the said John Eliot, my golden ringe, quher-in my stampe is engraven in with the first letters of my name and armes." (2.) The eldest daughter was married in 1656 to-Blair, minister near Linlithgow. He was son of Hew Blair, minister of Glasgow, (vol. iii. p. 368.) Another daughter, Christian Eliott, towards the end of 1660, married Mr. Robert Watson younger, minister of Cardross, (ib. p. 436.)No. V.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. cxxi Robert Watson, minister of Cardross, was dead in 1671, his Testament being recorded 31st October 1671, in the Commissary Records of Hamilton and Campsie. His relict was " Cirstane Eliott,11 and his executors-dative David and Margaret Watson. By Robert Baillie, her se^nd husband, Helen Strang had an only child ;— VIII. Margaret Baillie, born the 15th of July 1657, (vol. iii. p. 368.) From her father's testament it appears that she inherited a much larger portion than any of the children of the first marriage. This young lady must have married at an early period, probably about 1676. Her husband was John Walkinshaw of Barrowfield, Renfrewshire, descended from a younger brother of Walkinshaw of that ilk, in the reign of James the Sixth. There were, however, so many persons of the name during the 17th and early part of the following century, and so many intermarriages took place in the families of Walkinshaw and Barrowfield, that it is not easy to point out precisely the relative connections ; but after many inquiries, I imagine, the following may be considered as indicating the branch of the family with which Baillie's daughter was allied. John Walkinshaw of Barrowfield seems to have been the person who was one of the magistrates of Glasgow for several years, between 1655 and 1673, being one of the baillies in 1655, 1658, 1660, 1665, 1668, and 1673 ; and dean of guild in 1666, 1667, 1771, and 1672; and he appears to have had at least three sons;— (1.) John, the eldest son, the husband, as I suppose, of Margaret Baillie ; and it was no doubt this John Walkinshaw of Barrowfield who was served heir of John Walkinshaw of Barrowfield, his father, the 10th March 1693. (Inquis. Retorn. Lanark. 422.) The son or grandson of John Walkinshaw of Barrowfield, is said to have involved himself by his Jacobite principles; and to have been the person who, being taken prisoner, and confined in the Castle of Stirling, after the Rebellion in 1745, made his escape by his wife exchanging clothes with him. Miss Catharine Walkinshaw, who obtained so much notoriety as the mistress of Prince Charles Edward, has been described as one of his daughters. But, as already mentioned, there is great difficulty in identifying the different branches of the Walkinshaws, at this period. It is certain, however, that Catherine Walkinshaw, who lived abroad from the year 1754 to the time of her death, had a daughter to Prince Charles, and that he left the bulk of his property in the French funds to this daughter, who was legitimated in 1787, and whom he created Duchess of Albany; but she died at Bologna, 18th November 1789, when about 23 years of age, and her property was inherited by the Cardinal of York. The names of other daughters of John Walkinshaw, who formed alliances in this country, are mentioned in the Appendix to a volume entitled " The Cochrane Correspondence,11 pp. Ill, 145. Glasg, 1836. 4to. (2.) James, second son of John Walkinshaw of Barrowfield, and merchant in Glasgow. In 1683, Gavin Walkinshaw of that ilk alienated his lands to this James Walkinshaw, who died in 1708. His son and heir assumed the title of John Walkinshaw of Walkinshaw, and married Elizabeth Boyd. Their son John Walkinshaw of that Ilk, married Margaret Walkinshaw, daughter of- Walkinshaw of Barrowfield; while a second son William, married another daughter; and their grandson James alienated the property of Walkinshaw to William Millar in 1769. (Crawford's Renfrewshire, by Semple.)cxxii APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. [No. V. (3.) William Walkinshaw of Scotstoun, is also styled a son of John Walkinshaw of Barrowfield. He married Marion, daughter of Thomas Crawfurd of Cartsburn; and acquired, in 1691, the lands of Scotstoun, in the county and parish of Renfrew, although situated on the North side of the Clyde. George Crawfurd, in his Description of Renfrewshire, 1710, in mentioning the proprietor of Scotstoun, says, " by whom this place is so much improven, by a very handsome house, well furnished, and adorned with curious orchards and gardens, stately avenues, and large enclosures, sheltered with a great deal of beautiful planting: So that it has become one of the sweetest seats upon the river of Clyde in this shire." William Walkinshaw was a merchant in Glasgow, and a partner with Crawfurd and Corbet, " in the trade of manufacturing hemp into cordage, ropes, Sec." He died in June 1715, leaving an only son and heir, John Walkinshaw ; who, having engaged in the Rebellion that year, before he was seized in possession of the lands of Scotstoun, escaped abroad, but still continuing to draw money from the business of Crawfurd and Corbet, as his father's successor in that concern, although he had been specially included in the act of attainder. At a subsequent date some questions having arisen, both as to the money he had drawn from that business, and his right to the lands of Scotstoun, occasioned a protracted litigation, which was finally decided upon appeal to the House of Lords, 9th June 1737; the decision being in favour of his creditors, and the property came into the possession of the family of Oswald. It seems however to be certain, that Margaret Baillie, by her husband, John Walkinshaw of Barrowfield, had two daughters; some of whose descendants during the last century attained the highest distinction at the Scotish Bar. (I.) One of the daughters married George Home of Kames, in Berwickshire, who was served heir of his father, Henry Home of Kames, 6th October 1692. Their son, was Henry Home, born in 1696, so well known by his philosophical and juridical writings, and a Senator of the College of Justice, under the title of Lord Kames. The family is now represented by his Lordship^ grandson, Henry Home Drummond of Blair-Drummond, Esq. Member of Parliament for the County of Perth. (II.) The other daughter married Campbell of Succoth. John Campbell, Writer (Scriba) in Edinburgh, was served heir of William Campbell of Sockoth, his father, 7th April 1665. It was probably his son who married Miss Walkinshaw; unless Archibald Campbell, who passed Writer to the Signet in 1728, might have been the son, not grandson of John. Archibald Campbell, who became one of the Principal Clerks of Session, and died at an advanced age in 1790, was the father of Sir Ilay Campbell, Lord President of the Court of Session, who died 28th March 1823, in the 89th year of his age. The family is now represented by Sir Archibald Campbell of Succoth, Baronet, who also had a seat on the Bench from 1809 to 1825, when he retired. It only remains to add, that the Baillies of Jerviston (a small property in the neighbourhood of Hamilton), from whom Principal Baillie was descended, are not to be confounded with the Baillies of Jervis-wood, in Roxburghshire,—a family so distinguished, before the Revolu-No. V.] APPENDIX TO THE MEMOIR. cxxiii tion, by their sufferings for the cause of civil liberty, and their attachment to Presbytery. But among the persons who have claimed kindred with Principal Baillie, may be mentioned Dr. James Baillie, minister of the Kirk of Shotts, and Professor of Divinity in the University of Glasgow, who died 28th April 1778. By his wife, the sister of the two celebrated anatomists, Dr. William, and John Hunter, he left a son, Dr. Matthew Baillie, the eminent physician in London, who died 23d September 1823; and two daughters, one of whom is the present distinguished authoress of the " Plays on the Passions," and " Metrical Legends," Mrs. Joanna Baillie. ADDITIONAL NOTES AND CORRECTIONS. MEMOIR. Page xxvii.—Among other typographical errors, overlooked in the list at the end of Vol. Ill may be noticed in note 1, Academia, for Academics, and cumni for cum, in. Ib. p. xxix, note 1.—Robert Fleming appears as a benefactor to the College of Edinburgh, by contributing to the building of two chambers in 1644. (Crawford's Hist, of the University, p. 152.)—It may be added that in the " Inventorie of the voluntar contributions," for the advancement of the Library and fabric of the College of Glasgow, in 1630, " Mr. Robert Baillie, Regent," subscribed 100 merks. Ib. p. xlvi.—It is, I believe, a mistake to have said that either Baillie or Dickson ever actually signed their names in the manner alleged; as the Records of the College have been examined by a learned friend, and no such instance can be discovered. The assertion of their having done so, seems to have proceeded upon Principal Dunlop's MS. List of Masters, Principals, &c. in which they are so designated, the term Doctor having been taken from the minutes of their several appointments, as already noticed in the Memoir, in a sense unquestionably synonymous with Teacher. Ib. p. li, note 2.—It is a mistake to assert that Worcester House, in the Strand, had not been occupied by the Scotish Commissioners during their long residence in London, from the end of 1643 to 1647. The passage where Lord Clarendon speaks of crowds resorting to their public sermons, ought in all probability to be applicable only to the year 1640 and 1641, when the Commissioners resided in the City. The anonymous author of " Motus Britannici," (p. 60. Rotterdam, 1647, 8vo.) says, it was for the mutual convenience of themselves and their friends, with whom they had vol. i. rcxxiv ADDITIONAL NOTES AND CORRECTIONS. frequent and familiar intercourse, that the Scotish Commissioners changed their place of residence, (about 1645) :—" Hac de causa migrarunt Scoti ex Urbe, ubi antea sedem tenebant, ad Worcestrise sedes, ubi pro tempore hospitantur;" although other motives for this change were assigned at the time. Ib. p. lix.—On his return to Glasgow, Baillie was elected Dean of Faculty in the University of Glasgow, for three successive years, in July 1647, 1648, and 1649. The Church in Glasgow in which he had officiated previous to his being appointed a Commissioner to the Westminster Assembly, was the Tron Church. Having resigned the charge, Hugh Blair and George Young were admitted ministers of that church in 1644. Ib. p. lxvi.—The date of Gillespie's admission as Principal of the College of Glasgow, was the 14th February 1653. On the 12th October 1652, the election to supply the vacant places of Principal and second Professor of Theology was postponed till the 15th of that month, by the Moderators of the College ; and on that day Mr. John Young, first Regent, was elected by the Faculty " to the vacand profession of Theologies Baillie, as he tells Spang, (vol. iii. p. 238) was purposely absent, but he thus subscribes his colleague's appointment in the College registers,—" R. Bailly consents to this election." Young's admission, however, did not actually take place till the 20th January 1653. He was the son of George Young, one of the ministers of the Tron Church; and was the person of whom Baillie afterwards complained so bitterly for ingratitude. Upon the changes after the Restoration, Young conformed to Episcopacy. According to Keith, he " was elected Bishop of Argyle, but died before he was consecrated in 1661 ;" and was succeeded by David Fletcher, who held that See from the 18th January 1662 till his death in 1665. This is a mistake, as Young survived Fletcher* and was designed to be his successor; as we learn from some passages in letters from Archbishop Sharp to the Earl of Lauderdale. On the 29th March 1665, he says, " I find that the Bishop of Argyll is dead some dayes gone." On the 15th May, in reference to this vacancy, he adds, " that till I had spoke with the Archbishop of Glasgow and my Lord of Argyll, I could not determine upon a person for Argyll; and now, we having conferred about it, have pitched upon Mr. John Young, Professor of Divinity in Glasgow, as the fittest person on many accounts for succeeding to the See of Argyll." But on the 17th of June, that same year, he writes from Edinburgh as follows;—" Since I came to this place, I am told, by my Lord of Argyll, that Mr. Young is dead, to our great disappointment, through the loss of an able and usefull man." Ib. p. lxx.—All the previous accounts of Baillie's Life concur in stating that his second wife, Helen Strang, was the widow of Robert Wilkie, minister of the Blackfriars Church, Glasgow; and I have fallen into the same error, both in this place and at page 368 of Vol. III. She was the widow of Dr. James Elliott, who was admitted as Wilkie's colleague or successor in that church. He was translated to Edinburgh, in December 1635 : See p. cxviii.ADDITIONAL NOTES AND CORRECTIONS. cxxv LETTERS:—VOLUME FIRST Page 235. The person to whom this letter evidently was addressed, was William Home. Baillie thus mentions him, in 1657, " Eglintone writes to William Home, his servant, our baillie," &c. (vol. iii. p. 139.) Ib. p. 279. Letter from London, 12th December 1640. It may be noticed, that a contemporary copy of this letter, commencing with the words in line 2d, " Our first Demand," &c. is contained in a MS. volume, entitled " Historical Miscellanies," p. 321. (Advocates Library. MSS. 34, 2, 9, folio.) The doubtful word veyit, at the middle of page 281, in this copy reads willed; which makes the passage intelligible. Ib. p. 388, note 3. The date of this letter may be determined, by the mention at page 396, that 5000 men from Scotland were then in Ireland • these troops reached that county in April 1642. VOLUME SECOND. Page 105. This letter should have been dated earlier in November than the 17th, as Baillie seems (p. 107) to have reached London that day. The letter itself (foot of p. 104) professes to have been written before the vessel sailed, and the voyage must obviously have occupied several days. Ib. p. 217. In speaking of Colkittoch, at this time, the anonymous author of the " Motus Britannici," says, " Eligitur homo nequam Alexander Macdonald, vulgo dictus ColeMttoch nomine patronymico (quasi dicas, vafer Colenus) quod patris esset simillimus inter omnes alios liberos;" (p. 96.)—In the foot-note to the same page, Ardnamurchan is, by an oversight, said to be in Ayrshire, for Argyllshire. By a similar oversight, Jerviswood, the property of the distinguished patriot, Robert Baillie, is said at p. cxxii. to be in Roxburghshire, instead of the parish and -shire of Lanark. Ib. p. 340. The persons who are here mentioned, chiefly by their christian names, appear to have been Matthew, David, and James Forsyths, brothers of William Wilkie's mother-in-law, Abigail Forsyth, (the wife of Henry Gibson, " writer in Edinburgh, and indweller in Glasgow," who died within a few months of each other, he in August, and she in October, 1649;)—John Crichton, minister of Paisley, deposed by the Assembly in 1638;—Alexander Gibson ; Archibald Fleming of Peil, afterwards knighted by Charles II, and restored to his office of Commissary of Glasgow; Gavin Forsyth; and John Hay, minister of Renfrew. Wilkie's wife died in June 1655, and he agreed to pay to the Town Council a sum of £20 (Scotish,) for permission for her interment in the High Kirk of Glasgow. VOLUME THIRD. Page 224, note 4. The account of " The Life and Death of Mr. Robert Boyd, who died An. Chr. 1627,11 to which Baillie refers, is included incxxvi ADDITIONAL NOTES AND CORRECTIONS. " The Lives of sundry Eminent Persons in this Later Age. In Two Parts. I. Of Divines. II. Of Nobility and Gentry of both Sexes. By Samuel Clark, sometime pastor of Bennet Fink, London: printed and revised by himself just before his Death." p. 9. Lond. 1683, folio. Ib. p. 234, note. John Earl of Lauderdale was detained as a prisoner in England till the Restoration; but he was removed from the Tower to Windsor probably about 1654, where he may have enjoyed a greater degree of liberty, and employed his time in the literary occupations alluded to at p. lxxv. of the Memoir. Ib. p. 278. " Before his [Ramsay's] entry," &c. This is an oversight on the part of Baillie, as Ramsay was actually inducted, although he enjoyed the office of Principal for a very short time : See note to vol. iii. p. 207. Ib. p. 285. A copy of Baillie's dedicatory Epistle to Calamy, intended to accompany his Answer to Cotton and Tombes, (see p. xcviii) was contained in Vol. XXIII. of Wodrow's MSS. 4to. Unfortunately that volume, which might have supplied some additions to the present work, is supposed to be lost. The titles of such articles as it contained, either written by or addressed to Baillie, may be added from Wodrow's MS. Catalogue of his Collection of Manuscripts. "23. A short Consideration of the Reasons brought first in the Protestation, and then in another paper for the Nullity of the late Assemblie at St. Andrews. By Mr. Robert Bailay. " 27. Mr. Robert Bailay's Letter to Mr. Dickson, Sept. 10, 1655. " 47. Mr. R. B"s Letter to My L. (President, I suppose,) anent a meeting (I suppose of the College of Glasgow.) about an answer to Mr. James Durham's Letter, April 7, 1651. " 70. Mr. Robert Bailay's Dedicatory [Epistle] to his Vindication to Mr. Edmund Calamy. Glasgow, No. 1653. " 77. A letter to Mr. D. Dickson, (I suppose from R. B.) May 4, 1655, anent a meeting with Remonstrators. " 79. 80. Mr. R. B's Letter to Mr. Ash, Apr. 10, 1655, with Mr. Ash's answer."LETTERS AND JOURNALS OF MR. ROBERT BAILLIE. VOLUME FIRST.—M.DC.XXXVII.—M.DC.XLI.u/y. W-* Miv^vvd^Vj N n v^NY0 ov IM >» v\«y tnr n\oy p ilrfW- Reverend and Beloved Brother, As I promifed to yow, fo I have performed. Yefterday morning I ftiew to my Lord, that I intended on Sunday to have a Sefiion for to fend a Commifiioner to fupplicat the Councell, as I trufted mony of my neighbours would doe. After he had for a little diflyked my purpofe, and propofed fome impofiible wayes of his own, at laft he was weill content to approve our Supplicatione, and, if he had health, to back it, or elfe to write to his freinds. At my departure my Lord Montgomerie lighted; he allured me, that whether his father went or no, he would not faile to goe to Edinburgh for this eirand. Thence I went to Stevenltoune. Mr. John Bell, I left him willing not onlie to caufe his Sefiion fupplicat, but to goe to Dairy and acquaint Mr. Robert Bell with the purpofe, and to wreit to Mr. James Fullertoun, Mr. William Rufiell, Mr. Hew Eglintoun, to fencl the cheif gentlemen of their paroches with the Supplication. Thence I went to Ardrofiane. Mr. Alexander hes promifed to fend a Supplication, and to intreat himfelf, James Mitchell to carry it. Alfo to go to Kilbryde this day, and to requeift Mr. George to move his Sefiion on Sonday to fend Hunterfloune or (5) In the MS. this Letter has no address- It probably, however, was directed to one of the Ministers of Glasgow, either to Robert Wilkie or John Maxwell: Vide infra, p. 19.14 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1637. Waterftoune with their Supplication ; he lies promifed to write thence to Mr. Thomas Craig, that it was our defyre he fould be earneft with old Skelmurlie to carrie their Supplicatione. In my return, I came be the Kirilaw, where I left Cunninghameheid refolved to carie the Supplication of Stevenftoune, and to tak Mr. John Bell with him to Edinburgh. He promeifed alfo to goe this day to requeift old Blair to accept the Supplication of Dairy, for I thought it expedient that he wer in Edinburgh, efpecially to move his goodfone Blakhall, to informe my Lord Duke of Lennox. I have written to Mr. Michael in fuch a fafloun as yow would laugh at. I have told him how I under-ftood of the Supplication to be prefented; bot of your dealing or mine, I have told him nought. I have defyred him to fend me a double of his paroche Supplication, that I may conforme mine to it, and intreats him for this courtefie as a great favour ; alfo I defyre him to fhaw if they will give their Commiflion to young Rowallane, or to whom elfe. This I think be all that yow re-queifted of me at parting. Every thing lies fucceeded according to our minde. It refts that we pray for a happie event to God, that he would avert the poprie of the one fide, and the fchifme of the uther, and the bloodie fword of both. It were good that Hefilheid were in Beith on Sonday to accept the Commiflione of his paroche. Cunninghamehead promifed to write to Cap-ringtoune to accept the Commiflione of Dundonald. We ad-verteifed Mr. John Eergufhill that was in Dairy to adverteife his neighbours at his returne. Yow have negle6ted Kyle and Carrick ill: yow have tyme to adverteife Kyle yet, that out of mony paroches there may go a gentleman. When yow come to Edinburghe, yow will doe weill to imploy Mr. Archbald John-Itoune rather then they yow named to me, to mak that Toun fupplicat. Negle6t not to caufe Angous and Rothus at leaft, if no mo, to fpeik plaine Scottilh to my Lord Duke of Lennox and the Thefaurer ; what may coft them readilie their life and their lands, fall they not ufe means diligentlie to avert it. Wherever yow goe, imploy the Supplicationes of thefe yow know ufes to pray in earneft; however I differ far fra yow in judgement about many things, and ever the longer the more, yet the troubles of our poore Church and State I would redeem with the lofle of my right hand, yea, of my head, and all that I have, bot my foule alone and my confcience. The Lord be with yow, as happie as yow have been, to procure this good and wife courfe of fupplicating, both now and before. I truft1637. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 15 God lhall make yow als happie hereafter, if this meane prevaill not to be his inftrument to withdraw people from inraged, flefhlie, unchriftian, and divelifhe courfes, whereupon nature does fett too many, and the divell fpurres them under the falfe pretext of religion. Your Brother, [R. Baillie.] All that I have done is with fo little dinn as was poffible. The double of your Supplication will be given to all the Minifters I have named, except to Mr. Michael, for fear to marre him be any kinde of our prefcriptiones. As yow have defired, I have written alfo to Dunbarton. [To Mr. William Spang.] Deare and Loving Cusing, My bell reply to your complaint of the rarity of my letters, is their prolixity, if not fuperfluous tedioufnefs, when they come. I delayed alfo for a while to wryte, till ye had anfwered, as fundry tymes ye promifed, to fome pafTages of my laft, which did requyre anfwer. Ye fhall doe weell hereafter when ye take leafure to wryte to me, to have my laft befyde yow, that when ye take a blenk of it, ye may remember the cheif points wherein I crave your anfwer; bot the cheif caufe of my fo long delay, was my hovering expectation till our prefent commotions had come, if not to fome conclulion, yet to fome crife, that from thence I might have advertifed you with fome certain ground, what was our prefent ftate, and what hopes or fears we had for the future ; bot left this my expectation fhould occalion in yow thoughts of my undutifulnefs, if it continue any longer, I fhall fhew yow the eftate of our affaires as they are, at leaft as I am informed of them ; though as yet, they are hinging without any certaine, fo much as propenfion to fettle in any pofiture, which is knowen to us, or well imaginable to any man; only God knowes what he will doe with us all; for all, King, Court, Church, State, England, Scotland, feemes to be in a very ftag-gering ftate, if God with his hand hinder not men and divells from their humorous inclinationes; for, as yet, I think there be no refolution taken on any hand. In my laft I fhew yow how that, in the breaking up of the Winter Sefiion, there was a Proclamation, by found of trumpet,16 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1637. commanding all fubjedts, ecclefiaftick and civil, to conform them-felves to the Liturgie againft the nixt Pafch. Till that term there was no dinn; for the books were not printed till Aprile was pall, and a while thereafter. No diligence could obtaine a light of them ; bot in May, when letters was obtained by diverfe of the Bilhops, commanding, under the paine of horning, every Minifter in their Dioceffe to buy, for the ufe of their paroche, two of thefe books, there began to be much talking of that bulmefs ; which increafed when the Bilhop of Galloway, in his Affembly, had purchafed the confent of the moft part of his minifters to take thefe books, to ufe them ; as the word went, to buy them when they come from the prefle. Well I wote his Lordship alfo held in Galloway an high Commiffion, where, for matters of conformity, he fyned fome gentlemen: he confyned the Magiftrats of Kirkubrie to Wigtoun for a tyme; the Laird of Earlltoun, who, by Lorne, and the reft of my Lord Ken-mure's curators, was intrufted with the moft of that pupill's affairs, for his abfence, he fined in 500 merks, and confined his perfon to Montrofe. No dealing could move the Bilhop to pafs from the execution of this fentence ; yea, at the Coun-cill table, when Lorne was relateing fome circumftances of this bulineffe, he got a reply from the Bilhop, which he called a lie, and fo raife in high paffion, and yet remaines malcontent for that injurie. For myfelf, I think the Bilhop could not be fo impertinent, bot that rather that wife nobleman would make ufe of fome ralh word, which hes fallen from his mouth ; however, he and all the nobles takes it for a very pert affront done to their eftate, even in Councill. The matter, I hear, is before the King, and yet not agreed. It went alfo braid and wyde, and was told to the Bilhop's face, by my Lord Dumfreis, before the The-faurer, that he did wear under his coat, upon his breaft, a Crucifix of gold ; to which challenge his reply was bot faint. A certain gentleman told me, that he did fee, and handle, and conferre concerning that crucifix, with the Bilhop. For all this, I doe not believe it, for I, upon my old refpe6t to the man, made M. R. Hamiltone his familiar pofe him upon the matter; who reported to me his full purgation of this calumnie. However, that Synod and Commiffion in Galloway, that fuppofed lie and crucifix, did give no little occalion to the increafe of the people's murmures. The Bilhop of RolTe himfelf, in his Cathedrall at leaft, did, long before that time, and fo to this day continues to read a Liturgie, whether the Englilh, or ours printed at1637. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 11 London, I doe not know. The Bilhop of Dunblane, at his! 4 Synod, did read it; and gave all his Minifters Michaelmes terme to advyfe, whether then they would life that Book, or leave their places. The Bilhop of Edinburgh in his Synod, when -Mr. H. Rolloke had preached at length for the obedience to the King and Church, did read the Book. Mr. D. Michell and young Durie were the chief anfuerers. St. Andrewes in his dioceffe did propone the buying and ufeing of the Booke, and thereupon took inltruments. Glafgow was lick in Edinburgh; fo in our Synod was no word of this matter. In the meantime, fome copies of the Book goes from hand to hand; fome of the unconforme pairtie makes it their text daily, to {hew the multitude of the Popish poynts contained in the book ; the groffnefs of it far beyond the English; the way of the impoling of it, not only without any meeting either of Church or State, bot contrare to flanding lawes both of Church and State ; in a word, how that it was nought bot the Mafs in Englifh, brought in by the craft and violence of fome two or three of the Bifhops againft the minde of all the reft, both of Church and Statefmen. Thir things did found from pulpits, were carried from hand to hand in papers, were the table talk and open difcourfe of high and low. So it goes to the mids of July, when the King's letters comes down to diffolve the Commiffion for the Tithes, till farder advyfement, procured, as molt thought, by the Thefaurer, to croffe the Chancellour; who at that tyme was to draw in the Churches of the Abbacie of St. Andrewes, his new cafuality, and to caufe provide each of them a locall ftipend within the pariftie, which would have annihilate the tacks of many noblemen and gentlemen athort all Fyfe, fet by my Lord Duke of Lennox ; for many paroches were all dilapidat, and the Mini-fters, whiles two or three, provided out of the tithes of other parifhes : fo the Chancellour obtaining a locality to the Minifter, according to the Act of Parliament, within the paroche, would have much augmented his own rent, and diminifhed that of the tackfmen, and hurt the credite of the houfe of Lennox, who had receaved moneys for thefe tacks, which they could not warrand till expedients could be found. To remead this evill, the Thefaurer getts the Commiffion diffblved. St. Andrewes, whether to preveene this plot, or for what other defigne, re-folves to Court, and to Winter there. He thought to have ufed meanes to have been fent for; or, if thefe failed, to have pretended a voyage to the Bathes. Glafgow alfo did proteft, VOL. i. B18 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1637: off: tymes, that he would goe and complaine of the Thefaurer; who did continue, notwithftanding of all his contrare promifes, to fruftrate him of his gift of fyve thoufand pound fterling, out of the annuities of his Diocefe : for this voyage he had coft his horfe. So then, my Lord Arch-Bifhopes being refolved for Court, they thought meet, ere they went, to doe a peeee of acceptable fervice to the King, that when they came, they might be the more welcome : they will have the Liturgie praftiled m all the Churches of Edinburgh, without farder delay. A letter comes down from the King for this effect: The Bifhope and Minifters of Edinburgh are fent for : St. Andrews will hear no reafon of Ihifting, bot peremptorily commands them all to intimate, out of a printed paper, the King's command to have the Scotifh Liturgie read the Sabboth following in all their churches. The Commiffion is read out of all the pulpits; only Mr. Andrew Ramfay flights it. The whole body of the Towne murmures and grudges all the week exceedingly; and who can marvell, difcourfes, declamations, pamphlets, every where againfl this courfe; no word of Information, in publick or private, by any to account of, ufed for the clearing of it. So, on Sonday morning, when the Bifhop and his Deane, in the great Church, [and the] Bifhop of Argyle in the Grayfriers, began to officiat, as they fpeak, incontinent the ferving maids began fuch a tumult, as was never heard of fince the Reformation in our nation. However, no wound given to any, yet fuch was the contumelies in words, in clamours, runnings and flinging of ftones in the eyes of the Magiftrates, and Chancellour himfelf, that a little oppofition would have infallibly moved that inraged people to have rent fundry of the Bifhops in pieces. The day thereafter, I had occafion to be in the towne; I fand the people nothing fettled ; bot if that Service had been pre-fented to them againe, refolved to have done fome mifchief. Some fix or feven fervants were put in ward; the Towne put under ane Epifcopall interdict, which yet continues ; no preaching, no prayers on the week dayes, no reading nor prayers on Sunday. The Chancellour wrote up prefently the ftory to the King, with fome wype to the Thefaurer; who that foule day was from the towne. The Thefaurer and Counfellors being highly offended, that the Chancellour fhould wryte in fuch a bufinefs without their privity, delayed to write or fend their pofl till the Fryday. It was thought the Councill's letter did extenuate the matter fo much, as it might be laid on the rafcall mul-1637- LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 19 titude, with fome reflexion on the Bifhops imprudent precipitation. In the mean tyme, there was great fear for the King's wrath : the towne and countrey did quake till the return of the King's pleafure. Our gracious Prince was glad that the Towne, and all of any note, had been free of that tumult; as for the rafcall multitude, he committed the tryall and the cenfure of the fa6l to the Councill, only did command the ufe of the Service book with all poffible diligence. Before this tyme, the molt of the Biftiopes had raifed letters of horning, to charge all the Minifters in their Dioceffe to buy two books for the ufe of their parifhes within fiftein dayes. Glafgow was very diligent in chargeing all his Prefbyteries ; and by no in-treatie, would delay fo much as to his Affembly in Auguit, bot would have us all to the home prefently who would not buy. St. Andrewes moved many to buy the books without chargeing ; only two or three unconforme men were charged in his Dioceffe. Their wes ane overture made to us in Irvine, to fupplicat the Councill for a fufpenfion of this unreafonable charge ; after much advifement and doubts, we concluded to fend Mr. William Cas-tellaw to the Councill, with a Commiflion to fupplicat in the name of us all, for a fufpenlion. We fend over to Aire, to require them to conjoyne; but Mr. William Annan, their moderator, pro imperio, did difcharge all fuch motion ; only Mr. James Bonar went to Edinburgh for himfelf, and two or three others of his brethren. I having occafion, within two dayes thereafter, to be in Glafgow, did motion the matter to their Minifters, who had gotten prefently letters to be ready againft the Sonday nixt, to read the Service in all their churches. I had not much adoe to caufe them call their Prefbytrie, and fubfcryve all of them a pithie Supplication, penned by Mr. John Maxwell, carried by Mr. Robert Wilkie, on Wednesday, to the Council. Upon that Supplication mainly, for there was no more bot ours in Irvine ; Mr. James Bonar, for two of Aire; Mr. Alexander Henderfon, for himfelf, and two of St. Andrews, (whofe fupplication, becaufe much efteemed by the people, I have fett down;) I fay, Glas-gowes fupplication, and Mr. Robert Wilkie's diligence, to his infinite praife, did obtain from the Councill that ftrange letter to the King, which here ye have, and ane Act from the Councill, declaring that their minde in their letters, of chargeing the Ministers, was alone to buy the Books for their own information, bot not for any prefent ufe in their pariflies. Many noblemen by letters, many gentlemen in perfon, did folift the Counfellors,20 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1637. one by one, and gave them all thefe Informations, which here ye have alfo. All the Councill was moll earneft to fatilfy the countrey in holding off the yoke of that black book; only at the Bifhops vehement foliftations, for the refounding of the printer's expences, for which they flood obliedged, there was no fufpenfion given for the buying of two books. Whill ane anfwer fhould be returned from the King to this letter, all the farder profecuting of the matter was delayed to the 20 of September. Our Synod in Glafgow was indi6led on the laft Wedenfday of Augufl. The Bifhop wrote to me from Edinburgh, to preach thereat; and, withall, to incite all my hearers to obey the Church Canons, and to pra6tife the Service. I wrote back a flate refufall, fhewing the irrefolution of my own minde. For all this, in the Fryday before the Synod I receave new letters, commanding me, upon my canonicall obedience, to preach on Wednefday before the Synod, committing the matter of my Sermon to my own discretion. However I had bot two free dayes, yet I clioofed rather to obey then to have caft my felf in needlefs contefts with a troublefome man, and made my felf ready as I might, on that 2 of Timothy : "I charge thee before God, to preach in feafon, and out of feafon," &c. The Bifhop, as I was informed, had written to Mr. William Annan to preach on the Thurfday; bot coming to the town on the Monday, whileas I could not winn till the Tuefday late, the Bifhop agrees with him to take the Wedenfday, and thinks to keep me for the Thurfday, (as he faid idley to me) being the chief day of the Synod, when yet he might know that then the Synod would be diffolved. Glad was I that Mr. William Annan took that burden off me; for indeed I was not prepared as the tyme required. I would have fpoken no fyllable of any conformity, bot prefTed thefe paflorall duties, which would not have pleafed all. So I took it : and the event proved it to be a good providence for me, that I was freed ; for Thurfday I peremptorily refufed. Mr. William Annan, on the 1. of Timothy, " I command that prayers be made for all men," in thelafl half of his fermon, from the making of prayers, ran out upon the Liturgie, and fpake for the defence of it in whole, and fundry mofl plaufible parts of it, as well, in my poor judgment, as any in the Ifle of Brittain could have done, confidering all circumflances ; howfoever, he did maintain, to the diflyk of all in ane unfit tyme, that which was hinging in fus-penfe betwixt the King and the countrey. Of his fermon among us in the Synod, not a word; bot in the towne among the women,1637. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 21 a great dinne. To-morrow, Mr. John Lindfay, at the Bilhop's command, did preach; he is the new Moderator of Lanrick. At the ingoing of the pulpit, it is faid, that fome of the women in his ear affured him, that if he fhould twitch the Service Book in his fermon, he fhould be rent out of the pulpit; he took the advyce, and lett that matter alone. At the outgoing of the church, about 30 or 40 of our honefteft women, in one voyce, before the Bifhope and Magiftrats, did fall in rayling, curling, fcolding with clamours on Mr. William Annan : fome two of the meanefl was taken to the Tolbooth. All the day over, up and down the ftreets where he went, he got threats of fundry in words and looks ; bot after fupper, whill needleflie he will goe to vifit the Bifhop, who had taken his leave with him, he is not fooner on the caufey, at nine o'clok, in a mirk night, with three or four Minifters with him, bot fome hundredths of inraged women, of all qualities, are about him, with neaves, and ftaves, and peats, [but] no ftones : they beat him fore; his cloake, ruffe, hatt, were rent: however, upon his cryes, and candles fet out from many windows, he efcaped all bloody wounds ; yet he was in great danger, even of killing. This tumult was fo great, that it was not thought meet to fearch, either in plotters or a6tors of it, for numbers of the belt qualitie would have been found guiltie. To-morrow, poor Mr. William was convoyed with the Baillies and fundry Minifters to his horfe ; for many women were waiting to affront him more. Always at his onlouping, his horfe un-hapiely did fall above him, in a very foule myre, in prefence of all the company; of which accident was more fpeech then of any other. I think that Town's commotion does proceed mod from Mr. John Bell's vehement dillyke of the Booke, whereto I take him much to be furthered by his good fone, Mr. James, fo fhamefully abufed by the Bifhope, as I wrote to yow before. Alwayes, I fufpe6t, thefe tumults will hinder the Bifhop, for all his ftoutnefs, in hafte to caufe read Service in his Cathedrall. Great was the longing of the whole countrey for the 20 of September ; againfl it, all did expe6t this bufinefs Ihould take fome crife. The moll of the parifhes in the Sheriffdom of Aire, Fyfe, Louthian, Cliddesdaill, Stirlingfliire, Stratherne, did fend in Supplications with their chief gentlemen, to befeek the Councill to deprecat the King, that he would not urge the heavie burden of the Liturgie. A number of Earles and Lords, whofe names ye have, a great number of Barons, fundry burghes Commif-fioners, (Glafgow I moved, and by God's help, overcam many22 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1637- difficulties,) went to keep the dyet. My Lord Duke of Lennox coming down poft for his mother's buriall, who had died of a feavor, and wes buried the 17 of September in the night without ceremonie ; for her hufband, mainely by her princely carriage, is more then four hundreth thoufand merks in debt; my Lord Duke, I fay, had the carrying of the King's letter to the Coun-fell. A copie of it I have fent yow. For all the harlhnefs of it, the Commiffioners prefented their feverall Supplications. There was one common one prefented by my Lord Sutherland, the firft Earle of thefe who were prefent, in name of the Nobilitie, Barrones, Minifters, Brughes, there prefent. Ye have the copie, both as it was prefented, and as it was thereafter corre6led and mended to be fent up to the King. My Lord Duke was carefully follifted to agent this weighty bufinefs, and hes promifed to doe his endeavour. In his paffage, he was magnificently inter-tained in the Town Houfe of Glafgow,—he hes fubfcryved, in the Bifhop's prefence, an ancient band of his houfe, to maintain that good towne under the King, againft all whomsoever to his power. His Grace did avow, that the King was mifinformed much about the nature of the buiinefs. It is thought, that two yeares fince, the Bifhop of Roffe and Deane of Edinburgh being at Court, did give affurance, that the nobilitie and body of the land did much long for this Liturgie, and would give the King great thanks to give it; alfo, that with this laft letter of the Councill, which all who were prefent, even the Bilhops them-felves, whofe names ye have here, did fubfcryve, there went up privie informationes from the Bilhop of Dumblane to Canter-burie, (for the reft promifed to wryte nothing diffonant from the publick letter,) fhewing that if the King would goe on, he fliould finde little difficultie, though fome few puritanes in the Councill would make it feem otherways. However, the Councill made that A 61 which here ye have; and all, with molt earneft affection commended the affair to the Duke's Grace. The Thefaurer, his guider, layes it much to heart; and albeit it was greatly feared that he ftiould have been the violent executer of the King's commands, yet he hes given the Noblemen full affureance, that he will venture all he hes before our Reverend fathers get our fweet Prince fo farr abufed, as to loffe needlefly the hearts of all his fubje6ts. By the King's peremptory command, the town of Edinburge wes forced to receave, the 18 of September, Sir John Hay, Clerk-Regifter, for their Provoft. When they would have joyned with the reft of the burroughs to fupplicat, he did hinder.1637. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 23 After the Councill raife, a committee, as ye fee in the A 61, was ordained to fitt ftill, for to finde means how the Book fhould be quietly receaved in Edinburgh without farder delay. The people hearing of it on the Saturday, publickly, before the Bifhop, railes on their new Provost. On Monday he calls in the Tolbooth a Councill; the body of the towne keeps the dyett; men, women, and all rufhes in : All the threats of the imperious Proveft could not make any of them move. The Book, all of them cryed, they wold never have. At laft, they were moved to goe forth, by the Baillies requeft, till the Councill had advyfed ; bot with affure-ance, they would not goe from the doore till they had concluded to fupplicat for the towne to the Committee. The Provoft, after he hed drunken all thefe contumelies, was glad to promiffe a Supplication, and to affure they fhould as little and as late be troubled with that Book as any Burgh in the kingdome. Againft the nixt Councill day, the 1 of November, it is expe6led, that the mod of all the Nobility, Gentry, Burrows, fhall be prefent, to fend up their Commiffioners to Court. What fhall be the event, God knows: there was in our Land ever fuch ane appearance of a flurr; the whole people thinks Poperie at the doores ; the fcandalous pamphlets which comes daily new from England, adde oyl to this flame ; no man may fpeak any thing in publick for the King's part, except he would have himfelf marked for a facrifice to be killed one day. I think our people pofTefTed with a bloody devill, farr above any thing that ever I could have imagined, though the maffe in Latine had been pre-fented. The Miniflers who has the command of their mind, does difavow their unchriftian humour, but are noways fo zealous againft the devill of their furie, as they are againft the feduceing fpirit of the Bifhops. For myfelf, I think, God, to revenge the crying finns of all eftates and profeffions, (which no example of our neighbour's calamities would move us to repent,) is going to execute his long denunced threatnings, and to give us over unto madnefs, that we may every one fhoot our fwords in our neighbours hearts : our dreggs is like to be more bitter then was the brimme of God's cup either to the French or to the Dutch; ye and all your neighbours had much need to pray for us, as we have oft done for yow in your dangers. The barricads of Paris, the Catholick league of France, is much before my eyes ; but I hope the devill fhall never finde a Duke of Guife to lead the bands. The Miniflers being mett at dinner together, in a great num-24 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1637. ber, at the Councill-day, Mr. Andrew Ramfay, Mr. H. Rolloke, Mr. David Dick, Mr. Alexander Henderfone, Mr. J. Ker, and many moe did advyfe of overtures to calme this ftorme. Ane of them drew them up in this forme, which here I fend you: the updrawer is averfe from all conformitie, yet modeft here as could have been expected. I defiderat one overture, namely, a clear demonftration of their madnefs, who in this or any caufe will goe loffe their foule in refilling authority. The moft of thir things I think ye knew before ; yet, that ye may fee it is neither unkindnefs nor lazinefs that makes my letters to yow fo rare, I thought good ye lhould hear them altogether from me alfo. Weele is you, whom the ocean divides from thir evills, but yet grace and nature will not let yow be feparate from the near fenfe of them. Your Father this half year hes keeped the houfe ; it were good ye came, and bade him once fareweell, and viewed your mother countrie before it be defolate : the hearts of all doe tremble for feare. I wrote to yow for fome books, as ye will fee in my laft letter ; fome of them ye have fent, the reft it is no marvell ye have not fent, I am fo great a dyvour : But God willing, if we be all living about Candlemas, I fhall have moneyes at yow for all I wrote for, and for my four yeares Currants. Send me no books unbound : I wtfh all in leather ; bot frae it cannot be, it's better to have them in your parchement, then to be fafched and extortioned with James Sanders in Glafgow. Dear and loving Coufine take all this in good part; commend me heartily to your wife. My heart is for the prefent full fore for that poor Land wherein we were borne, and Church wherein we were regenerat; if it were not a God who permitted a powerful devill to blinde and inrage men againll the common principle of cleare naturall reafon, let be equity or religion, I think both our Bifhops and their oppofers might be eafily withdrawn from deftroying themfelves and all their neighbors ; bot God and devills are too ftrong for us : The Lord fave my poor foul! for as moderate as I have been, and refolves in the fpite of the devill and the world, by God's grace to remaine to death. For as well as I have been beloved hitherto by all who has known me, yet, I think I may be killed, and my houfe burnt upon my head; for I think it wicked and bafe to be moved or carried down with the impetuous fpait of a multitude ; my judgement cannot be altered by their motion, and fo my perfon and ftate may be1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 25 drowned in their violence : I wifti my fears may be difappointed. The Lord be with you. [R. Baillie.] October 4, 1637. My fears in my former went no farther then to ane ecclelialtik feparation, but now I am more affrayit for a bloudie Civill warr. My feven lheits of wreits with Mr. Chrichtoune(1) yow will fend with your particular cenfur weill clofit. I have written another fmce on Predeftination : if you pleas I fhall fend it you. I wilh that fome of your letters wer far more particular and large then this long tyme they have been : yow continually forget to fend to the College a Mercurius. Ther cam a comand to the Counfell, and from thence to all our Borrowes, that no Magiltrat ftiould be chofen but of men conforme. If that Act wer urgit, we could have in all our Tounes no Magiftrates at all, or verie contemptible ones. But impollibilitie here will crave a difpenfation ; yet it fhows our Bifhopes intention to be heavie urgers of thir traditions oij^att^ publick officers as weell as on poor minifters. V ~ " "' '■• -f V A Note of Proceidings since the 5th of December. ^^ The Commilfioners came to Edinburgh on Tuefday the 5th December, and were dealt with by the Counfellers, that upon Wednefday, the 6th thereof, we fhould not go to Linlithgow on the 7th, there to prefent our fupplications to the Counfell there to be holden, upon promife that nothing ftiould be done there to our prejudice; and that within 48 houres after their returne from Linlithgow, a day fhould be appointed for receaveing our greivances and fupplicationes. Upon Thurfday the 7th in Linlithgow, and in Edinburgh on Saturday the 9th, Proclamation was made, declaring the King's abhorring of all fuperftition of Popery, and freedome from intention to allow any thing contrary to the religion prefently profefled, and laudable lawes of this kingdome. Upon Monday the 11th, Proclamation for fitting of the Counfell and Seffion at Stirling the 2d of February, and untill that tyme, of the Counfells fitting at Dalkeith, Tuefday and Thurf- 0) John Crichton, Minister of Paisley, was deposed for erroneous doctrine, by the General Assembly, in November 1638.26 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1637. day weekly. Upon the felf fame day the Commiffioners were dealt with be the Thefaurer and Privie Seall, to goe to Dalkeith the morne ; thereafter to attend the Counfell in a fmall number, not exceeding twelve in whole; and to divide their fupplications, every rank and Shireffdome coming with their fupplica-tions apairt: which, becaufe it tended to divifion, was refufed. Upon Tuefday the 12th, the Commiffioners coming forth as they were appointed, were affayed, If they would divide their numbers ? If they would fend in their fupplications by a maiffer or clerke, and not come in themfelves ? If they were come as The Three Eftates, or as fupplicants of all ranks ? Whereunto was anfwered, That they would not divide, nor fend in their petitions by the clerke nor maiffer, nor call themfelves otherwayes than fupplicants of all ranks. At length, the heads of their fupplications being underftood, they were delayed till the morne. Upon Wednefday the 13th, the Commiffioners coming againe, as they were appointed, were dealt with to alter their :fubfcryved fupplication, in the poynt thereof that concerned the Prselates as their parties ; which being found by the whole Commiffioners de-ftru6live of the fubfcryved fupplication, and without the bounds of their commiffion, was refufed; whereupon the Counfell refufed to receave it on thefe termes; and while the Commiffioners were about to take inflruments of their diligence, and the Coun-fells refufall, the Counfell brake up abruptlie. The brethren mett daylie, and likewife the reft of the Commiffioners, and by conference, by reafons of fubfcriptions, by rea-fons of not altering any thing in the fubfcryved fupplication, by reafons of union, and to conform themfelves in unity in the good caufe more and more unanimouflie, and to infift for anfwer to their fupplication ; whereof, when they faw no apeirance of anfwer, they refolved upon a proteftation before the Counfell, and a fupplication to his Majeftie; and faw a neceffity of humbling themfelves and their flocks, in refpect of the prefent diftrefs of our Kirk ; bot would not take upon them to indyte a fett uni-verfall publick faft, bot thought it fitt that every man be himfelf, in his own tyme, fo conveniently as he could within their own charge, with confent of their feffions, fhould humble themfelves publicklie, and acquaint their people with this obtruded Liturgie, how farre contrarie it is to the Confeffion of Faith, fworne and fubfcryved be all ranks in this kingdom. They refolved alfo, that the Colledges fhould be brotherly admonifhed to beware of the Service Book, and of fuffering1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 27 any corrupt do6trine to be taught amongft them, left parents fhould be forced to remove their children. Upon Tuefday the 19th of December, we went to Dalkeith to attend the Counfells anfwer to our petitions formerly given in, and prefented this Bill, the copie whereof followeth. (2) For Mr. R. Wilkie.(3) 16th of January 1638. Right Reverend, I am longer your debtor then I promifed: your long ftay in Edinburgh made me flacker in my performance. Alwayes for this delay of tyme, I have fent yow ane large ufury, my papers much inlarged beyond that they were before. I hope ye fhall be comforted by them, and incouraged to goe on in your difpofi-tion, by the ftrength of God, to [oppofe] thefe who now, in their publick avowed wryts, condemnes almoft all the moft fundamental! truths of our profeffion, of manifeft error, if not hereiie. I think they are verie few who will be pleafed to take paines to try the wreits which the Canterburians hes published thir laft nyne years, bot they will be forced to juftify thefe who are moft forward among us to oppofe, with all their might, what innovations comes from their facred hands. If ye be incouraged, I have all I wifh by performance of my promife, which ye did draw from me by your requeift at your laft parting; fo I reft your loving and much obleidged. For Mr. Alexander Cuninghame.(4) January 16, [1638.] Alexander, Thefe are thanks for this dayes letter; the larger it was I (2) The Bill here referred to, and the various other Papers which Baillie mentions as transmitting copies of to Mr. Spang, are transcribed in his MS. Register of Letters. It was thought advisable, however, to keep his own Letters and Journals distinct from such documents, most of which are easily accessible in a printed form. (3) Mr. Robert Wilkie was appointed one of the Ministers of Glasgow in J 621, and was frequently connected with the University. He was Dean of Faculty in 1621 and 1625.. Rector in 1629, and Vice-Chancellor in 1637. (4) It is probable that this person was the same who was proprietor of the28 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. lyked it much the better, yet ye mull not lyke this the worfe that it is fhort, for it is now paft eleven at night. I marvell upon what ground the report of my fcrapings is rifen ; the truth is, at my going to Edinburgh, forefeeing I would be fpeared at my reafons of my diflyke of our book, I caft my thoughts on the new falfe doctrines, which I had read of late in fome Englilh treatifes, whereto our book in fundry palTages was applicable. Of thir I fpake in the meeting when I was pofed ; my difcourfe I was intreated to putt in write, by fome of the hearers, as alfo by fome of the brethren of Glafgow, who feemed to lyke the purpofe. At my returne I made a little collection for their fatiffaction; this I did fhew to fome very few, who to my knowledge hes no copie of it at all, and did keep it fo fure and clofe as I could wilhe, having their faithfull promife to that end; for my Lord Montgomerie, he knew not of it by me lefle or more. Alwayes lince ye are defyreous to fee thefe fcriblings, I have written to Mr. William Wilkie, to whom I communicat all I have, to fliow yow them. I know ye will be fecret, for wrytes of that kinde are very dangerous. For matters of ceremonies, I know no reafon of changeing my minde ; yea a late book, which others admire as a peece unanfwerable, hes made me more averfe then I was from thefe mens doctrines and practifes; bot withall J am glad to joyne with them in oppoling a common enemie; lince no other way is left, bot either to fwallow down all that the Canterburians can invent, or elfe to oppofe them plainly in their lawlefs practifes. I pray yow Itudy much, and pray much, that ye may be a good man and a fchollar, which are not too oft together. If ye have befyde yow my letter, written the 6th of March 1636 to yow, at the firft publilhing of the Book of Canons, the double whereof this day I finde, ye will fee that what now I doe is no change of my minde, bot the performance of that [which] then I refolved; yea, if ye will read a leiffe in Latine, which about this fame day four year I penned, and about that tyme lhew to Mr. William Wilkie, who now hes it, ye will finde me altogether the fame man this day which then I was. I moll in-dure by fome ignaries to be counted a penitent, as retracting of confcience my differences which, in preaching and wryting, I had with fome men ; bot it is not fo. small Estate of Hyndhope, in Selkirkshire, and afterwards became Minister of Ettrick. Alexander Cunningham the Historian was his younger son.1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 29 Eor the Principall.(5) Reverend and Weel-Beloved Brother, I have been, I fufpe6l, too long in your debt: receave now from my boy feventeen dollers, two (hillings, and a lixpence, which in my counting is fourty-eight punds; this is eight pound for each of your fix volumes, if any man more bidd, at my coming I fhall either make it out, or reftore the books. I have fent yow alfo my little colledtion from the late Englifh treatifes I have feen. I wifh indeed ye did conlider the paffages : I did draw it up mainely for yow ; for befyde your defyre that I fhould doe fo, my earnefl defyre that ye fhould be acquaint with all I knew, made me take that paines to the end, that finding thefe men who now rules all, fo corrupt in the maine poynts of our do6lrine, ye might be moved to help the Church of God at this fo needfull a tyme. Your great place and great abilities does call yow to it before any man I know in the weft of Scotland. Your firfl concurrence did a great deall of good to further that univerfall re-fufeall of the Book which followed. Your withholding of your hand from the lafl complaint, I hear much fpoken of, and heavily taken; bot what I can I juflifie it, at leafl excufes it to my power. However ye continue to joyne in that complaint or not; yet I wifh earneflly that ye may try the way of our Court Clergy, and if ye finde them to be in a courfe of undermyning our religion, that ye would not faile to bear witnefs of it, as none can doe better. The hazard of fo doing will not be fo great, as the con-fcience of fo good a turne will be comfortable, come what may. Bot I have clean forgot myfelfe by my idle prefumption to ad-vyfe the like of yow in fuch a matter. I have fent yow my lafl tuo conferences with Mr. Creichtone. When ye get leafure, ye will cafl them over, and at meeting give me your cenfure. Mr. John Maxwell was earnefl with me for a fight of thefe papers ; if ye thinke it expedient when ye have read them, let him fee them; ye may fee what I wreit to him: if ye think it not expedient, burne the letter to him ; as for my conferences with Mr. Creichtone, keep them for your felf alone. We are all well, praifed be God, and defyres to hear the lyke of yow all. Our commendations remembred. I reft, Your Brother, Kilwinning, January 16 1638. R. B[aillie.] (5) Dr. John Strang, Principal of the University of Glasgow.30 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. Stafford and Coofins, and what other books I left with you, I pray yow give to my boy : I am much craved for them. Ye will clofe Mr. John's letter if ye think meet to delyver it. For Mr. John Maxwell.(6) Reverend and Weel-beloved Brother, Ye refrelhed me at our laft two or three meetings, and flill I am refrefhed when I remember your full confent with me in all the points now in queftion, and your hote zeale againft the new doctrines of the Englifh faction. Ye defyred me to draw up thefe things in write, whereof I did fpeak to you, and fend them to you, that ye might in your fermons, in that eminent place before the fcholars, fett yourfelf againft thefe new errors as manfullie as the yeares bygone ye had done. In the matter of Antichrift, I have done as ye defyred ; receave therefore thefe my papers : if there be any paffage whereof ye doubt, I hope to make it good, for fince that wreit, I have fallen on other their treatifes wherein they vent the fame errors which are there, and fome moe and worfe, if moe or worfe can be. Thir are times that every one of us mull help others, and ftrengt.hen others to maintaine the truth of God committed to our cuftody. When they troubled us bot with ceremonies, the world knowes we went on with them, (whereof we have no caufe to repent,) fo farr as our duty to God or man could require : bot while they will have us, againft ftanding Lawes, to devoire Arminianifme and Popery, and all they pleafe, lhall we not bear them wit.nes of their op-preffion though we fhould die for it, and preach the truth of God, wherein we have been brought up, againft all who will gainfay. Much good may ye doe in this caufe ; your firft Supplication did much help : goe on in the name of God; whatever danger ye can fall in by doing God fervice, it will not be comparable to the great curfe of God upon Meroz, who, when able, and called, wer unwilling, for their own reafons, to help the Lord againft the mighty.—Had I one half dozen fo able and flout as ye to goe before me, I would not be afraid to reafon the equity of our caufe in the face of an OEcumenick Synod, againft all the Canter^ burians in Brittaine, though they had on their fyde all the Bifhops with them, as they have not the halfe. The Lord be with you, (6) One of the Ministers of Glasgow.1638. JOURNALS AND LETTERS. 31 moll loving Brother, and direct you what you have to doe in your place and at thir times. Your Brother. Kilwinning, January 16, 1638. To Mr. William Spang. Feb. 27, [1638.] coosing, Oft hes your letters been welcome to me, and much wifhed for, bot none ever fo wifhed, fo welcome as the laft. A moneth before, I was in a great perplexity concerning yow, as Mr. William Wilkie can teftifie; for to him only I fent word for fecret tryall of the truth. I apprehended your death : for Mr. Robert Blair told me, that at his laft being in Edinburgh, David Jonkkin, and fundry other merchands of Edinburgh, at diverfs occafions, had dealt with him to fee if he would accept the Miniftrie of Camphire. His averfnefs, after fo manie fea crofles, to accept any charge over fea, made him reje6l the motion without any farder inquirie ; bot I concluded, that thefe men could not be fo impertinent as to fpeak of your charge to another, except they had been allured of the vacancie of it, either by your death or tranfportation: this I thought not poflible, without my privitie. The other therefore I did much feare, and was not fred of manie heavy thoughts till I got your letters; bot thereafter I blefled God that ye were to the fore to the Church, to your Countrey, to your friends, and to me. I am glad alfo that my letters, or any thing from me, does you pleafure. The flate of our affaires, fince ye afTure me of your defyre to know them from me, have it fo farr as I am informed. What had paft to the 20th of September laft, ye have in my former letter. I fhall fend you now what hes befallen fince, after fome gleanings of the former tyme, whereof fince I have had intelligence. The 20th of December 1636, there come a miflive to the Councell, brought doune by the Bifhope of Rofle, commanding all to conforme themfelves to a Liturgie, which the King had feen in write, and approven. The miflive ye have at the letter (A,) the Act of Councell and Proclamation made there-frae is printed in the frontifpeece of our booke. It was well near May thereafter ere the books were printed: for, as it is now perceaved by the leaves and fheets of that booke, which32 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. was given out athort the Ihoppes of Edinburgh, to cover fpyce and tobacco, one edition at leall was deftroyed: bot for what caufe we cannot learne ; whether becaufe fome grofs faults was to be amended, or fome moe novations was to be eiked to it; both reafons are likelie ; only it is marvellous that fo many being confcious of neceffity to this deed, the fecret of it fhould not yet come out. Bot fhortly after the outcoming of the booke, the Bifhops, upon a narrative not well grounded, as the event fhewes, obtaines ane A6t of horning on all minifters, the 13th of June 1637, who will not buy two of thefe books for the ufe of their pariihes ; this A 61 ye have at the letter (B) : what followed on the firft practife thereof in Edinburgh, I wrote before. From the 24th of July to the 10th of Auguft, the polls rann thick betuixt the Court and the Counfell, which fatt every other day, to finde means for peaceable introduction of the Service. There wanted not good will in the Magiftrates and Minifters of Edinburgh, for to do his Majeftie fervice, as ye may fee in the minut of the Counfell a all the Counfell refolved to wryte of the neceffity of his Ma-jeftie's information by fome of his fervants, the choyce of the men they remitted to his own difcretion. With this the vacants came ; all went home, bot fome few Commiffioners, appointed by turne to lye ftill in Edinburgh for all occurrents. When the countrey wes away, the Proveft fell a frelh to his policies, deales mightily to make the towne fupplicate apart to feek the King's favour, and pardon for their tumults ; gives them full affureance, will they bot ufe thefe formalities, the King fhall freely pardon them, fliall quyte them of the Service Book for ever, except the whole Kingdome be moved willingly to take it, which he thought would never be : for in all his difcourfes from the beginning, he enveighed againft the Booke as much as any ; alfo, that Counfell and Seffion fhould prefently be reftored to them, and their privi-ledges much augmented. It feems the man had undertaken to make that towne come in the King's will; and fo, for the effectuating of his promife, did give affureance of many things which neither he could nor would be any wayes carefull to have performed. By this dealling, he had prevailed with a great number of the Counfell; bot the Commiffioners that were in the towne finding it going fo, remonftrated to the Towne Counfell by James Cochrane and John Smith, (very good inftruments in all this matter,) That their fupplicating apart might be the betraying of1637. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 47 the whole Kingdome; their craveing pardone for any thing fome bafe people in the toune, which could not be found, had done againft the innovators of religion, would be a preparative to bring the whole City, and all in the Kingdome who had oppofed the Booke, within the compaffe of law, and the courteours mercy; alfo, that the crafts and commons would be inflamed to violent them all, if they would affay to conclude any fuch things, as it is faid they were indeed ready to doe. Upon thir remonftrances, the Proveft's dealings evanilhed, and all the Counfell refolved to flick by the reft of the Kingdome, to defend their juft caufe by the law, and fuffer all inconveniences ere they, as they had done too oft before, fhould be ane evill preparative to the reft of the Kingdome. In the meantyme, the Prelident flipps to Court. The Counfellors had advyfed, and entreated him not to goe, upon the Nobles defyre, who required, that none fhould be permitted to goe, farr leffe he, who was almoft a profeffed enemie to them, and an agent for the Bifhops, that the King's firft information might be by thefe of the Counfell whom they expe6ted ftiortly the King himfelf would call for. Notwithftanding, he went his way; bot to the great malcontentment of all. His friends gave out, his only eirand was, for his Father's (*) dimif-lion of the Chancellary, and compofition therefore ; for the fet-tleing of the Seffion, which, to the great prejudice of all the members of the houfe, had long vaicked, and was longer like to vaicke. In his way, it is faid, he diverted to York and Dure-hame, and fome other of the Bifhops. When he came to the King, they fay, his information was fo hard, that the King was penlive, and did not eat well; bot that my Lord Haddington hearing of his mifreports, was bold to putt in the King's hand a late miffive which he had got from his good-brother Rothus, having a fhort information of the countrey's proceeding; for the abfolute truth whereof Haddington undertook. The reading of this contented fomewhat the King; whereupon his minde being difpofed towards the Lord Thefaurer, my Duke of Lennox wrote for him to Court, and thereafter the King himfelf, and Marques of Hamilton alfo. With all this, he went to Roxburgh, and fhew it to him, of whom he was jealous. Roxburgh was nothing content that he was not fent for; yet he pretended the ne-cefiity of his flay for his onely fonn's marriage with Arroll's C1) Sir Robert Spottiswood, the Lord President of the Court of Session, was the second Son of John Spottiswood, Archbishop of St. Andrews, and Lord High Chancellor of Scotland.48 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1637. daughter, and in the meantyme, did write with the Thefaurer favourable letters to the King, in the prejudice of any mifmfor-mation the Prefident, or any other, could make. The Commifiioners were very earneft, that the Thefaurer would take up ane Information, which Balmerinnoch and Mr. Archbald Johnftone (the only advocate who in this caufe is trufted,) had penned, to prefent it, together with their Bills, which elfe would be bot naked peices. This he abfolutely re-fufed to look upon or touch, for he faid he was to purge himfelf by his oath to the King, that he had feen no fuch thing, only he was content it fould goe in his company, and affured it fhould come to the King's hand. So he went away with my Lord Or-biftone,(2) whom he keeps by all meanes to hold the Marques faft. By the way he wes almoft drouned ; he come out of a water, they fay, hinging by his horfe taile. His porter being difmilTed for evill fervice, fett upon his Lady, in the garden of Dalkeith, with a drawn fword ; and had not other two fervants gone be-tuixt, who both are hurt, the villaine had certainly killed her. They fay, that Stirling is like to be difgraced ; that the King being malecontent he was not more tymoufly informed of all thir matters, the Thefaurer Ihew, that though they were difcharged publickly to fend any word of that bufinefs, yet they had acquainted ever privately the Secretar,(3) that he might advertife. This the Secretar granted; bot Ihew that he was hindred by Canterburie to prefent the King fome peices. Canterburie de-nyed this, hopeing to bring Stirling off another way, though in this he fuccumbed: bot all this is bot uncertaine rumors. So ye have all I know in this matter, whether true or falfe : readily there is not any one from whom ye can gett a more full narration. I have conferred, and had ufe of the wreits of thefe who had chief hand in all the matter, both of the Nobility, and of the Gentry, and Miniftrie : for your fatiffadlion I was the more curious; what will be the end, no living can gueffe. If God be pleafed to bring upon us the year of our vifitation, the devill could never invented fo pregnant a meanes, and have ruined this Ifle, one and all, from the prince to the ploughman : for will the Prince, at the clergies defyre, goe on in violence to preffe their courfe, the mifchieffs are prefent, horrible, in a clap : (2) Sir John Hamilton, one of the Lords of Session, under the title of Lord Orbieston. (3) Sir William Alexander, Earl of Stirling, was Secretary of State for Scotland.1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 49 will he relent, and give way to our Supplications, the danger is not paft: We wot not where to Hand; when the Bookes of Canons and Service are burnt and away, when the High Com-miffion is doune, when the Articles of Perth are made free, when the Bifhops authority is hemmed in with never fo manie laws ; this makes us not fecure from their future danger: fo whatever the Prince grants, I feare we prefle more then he can grant; and when we are fully fatiffied, it is likely England will begin where we have left off, to crave order of the greater and more intolerable abufes of their Clergy; fo that it is not probable our dangers can be foon ealily evited ; to prevent thir, the courfe we ufe is humiliations in privat and publick, which indeed hes gone through oft the mofl of our congregations. If God be pleafed to be gracious, we know he hes wifdome to turne this affaire, which may wracke all, to the redreffing of all, to purge the Church of all that leaven and tyrannie of the Englifh Bifhops whereunder it long hes groaned, to give to our Laws and Parliaments the old and full [authority] and liberty and truth, to joyne the heart , of the King and his fubjedls fafler in love then ever, and remove the jealoufies and griefes whereof the minds of both this tyme byegone has been replenifhed, to enable us to help the Churches abroad, and to contribute all our forces of witt, learning, and armes, againfl the Antichriflian fa6tion. Thir are our prayers and flender hopes in the midfl of our defperat feares. This farr I had written long agoe, but now many things are fallen out. The Thefaurer came backe from Court the 19th of February. About eight dayes before, his man had come doune with a peremptorie command, by found of trumpett, to caufe the Members of the Seffion to be at Stirling, for their office. The Lords obeyed; bot the Advocates of any note would not goe thither. The Thefaurer, when he mett with the Nobles, affured them, with oathes and great affeverationes, that he had no dire6lion from the King concerning their Supplications. In this Roxburgh did joyne with him ; bot from friends at Court, they were informed of the contrare, and fhortly, by privie intelligence at home, gott a double of the King's injunctions, which was a proclamation to be made at Stirling February 20th ; wherein the King took the Books on himfelf, and discharged the Bifhops of all fault, condemned all the fupplications and fub-fcriptions, commiflions and all meetings hitherto for that end; VOL. I. D50 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. bot did pardone bygones, difchargeing all fuch meetings in tyme to come, under higheft paines, and yet was willing to hear fup-plications which did not incroach on his royall prerogative, either in matter or manner, as the former had done. This coming out to light, polls went forth athort the whole countrey, with this information, written by Mr. Archibald Johnftone, for to him the prior informations, both from Court and otherwayes, oft after midnight, are communicat. This information the Bilhops caft on the Thefaurer, and fo it is thought; yet Mr. Archibald affured me it came from none of his. This alarme being given, all did make hafte. The Thefaurer finding his purpofe revealed, intended to have the proclamation precipitat. He had before perfuaded the Nobility that onlie two ftiould goe to Stirling, where he affured no prejudice Ihould be done to their caufe : bot it was found he intended to keep thefe two, Rothus and Lindefay, prifoners in the Caftle of Stirling; therefor the Nobility refolved to goe together. To prevent this, the Thefaurer and Roxburgh went from Edinburgh a little after midnight. One of their footmen being taking a drinke in a tavern, where a man of Lindefay's, I think, lay, told, that his mafter was that earlie on horfe for Stirling. His companion was not long in advertifing his mafter; who at once wakened others of the nobility: fo Lindefay and Hoome took poft, and outrode the Thefaurer; the reft followed at leafure. The Thefaurer not finding a number for a quorum, without Counfell did make the proclamation early in the morning. Hoome and Lindefay ftood in the croffe with the Lyon herauld, and made a proteftation. The Counfell meeting in the afternoone, did approve the proclamation ; which was much marvelled at, efpe-cially that Angus and Neper ftiould put to their hands to it. It was thought that Lome, Southefk, Lauderdale, and Wigton fhould be put off Counfell; bot we fee it was not fo. Angus and Neper hath ftiowed their repentance for their rafhnefs. The Advocat* comeing the morne, would by no meanes fubfcryve the act of approbation of that proclamation, for this reafon efpeci-ally, that the King's dire6tion in it was tranfgreffed; for the King's warrand bare bot the hieft paine, bot the proclamation did beare the paine of treafon. Thir things hath much alienated the minds of the Nobility from the Thefaurer, both that he ftiould have deceaved them with his oathes, and alfo extended his com-miflion, to the uttermoft bounds, if not beyond, to the ruine of their caufe and perfons. Yet it is faid for him, that at Court he1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 51 was putt in great danger of his place. The King did pofe him upon thirty-eight articles in wryte, furnifhed by the Prefident againft him; wherein he gave the King reafonable anfuers, withal that he gave the King a full information of all the wryts and deeds had paft, that he had brought the King to a tollerable mood, till letters come from the Chancellour, afiureing, that as the Noblemen who were banded for the flaughter of David Rizzio did difband and flee away fo foon as the Queen, his good dame, had proclaimed them traytors ; fo upon the King's condemning of the Nobles proceedings, and difchargeing them hereafter under thefe paines, all this combination would evanifh, and the King would fo come by his intent. Thir letters altered the King's minde, and put him to take the courfe which may prove wonderfull unhappie: peremptorily he commands the Thefaurer to execute it, and for his fidelity and fecrecy put him to his oath. This he undertook, yet leaving under his hand his contrare opinion and advife. Howfoever, the Thefaurer, who indeed hath been an happie inftrument in this bufiinefs, is like to lofie both the King and the Countrey, which will feeme fweetnes to the Bifhops in the midft of their mines. The charge was to remove from the towne within fix houres. The Noblemen who came in frequency againft the afternoone, flayed all that night, and for no requefl would remove; for they alleadged their proteflation did warrand them. Yet when the Chancellor and Thefaurer had yoaked their coatches to depart, profeffing that the Sefiione and Counfell would break up as troubled by them, they were content to goe ; and fo they did, leaving direction to thefe who came there to attend the common bufiinefs, to follow them to Edinburgh ; alfo when the Counfell did meet, or the admiflion of my Lord Doune to their number, Arthure Erfkine and Poomeefe thronging in with the multitude, after the ufhing of the houfe, did prefent the declinator, and tooke in-flruments thereupon. My Lord Doune fubfcryved prefently the fupplication, to the great difcontentment, as they fay, of Murray his father. The Bilhop of Galloway was like to have receaved injury in Stirling; bot the Magiflrates fawto him. In his returne at Falkirk, the wives railed, and fhord him with flones, and were fome of them punifhed; alfo at Dalkeith, upon Sonday, the wives fo railed upon him, that the Thefaurer put two of them in prifon. The Bifhope is in great fear and danger, and fhowes little of his old defyre of martyrdome in this fo good a caufe. When we come to Edinburgh, the 22d of February, we found52 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. that the proclamation had been repeated there, that lixteen Noblemen had gone up to the crofTe with the Lyon herauld, and after their reverend hearing of the King's proclamation, had caufed Mr. Archibald Johnftoune, at the fame tyme and place, to pro-claime their proteftation. In the meane tyme, the countrey gathers fall to the toune. The Noblemen, Gentry, Cities, and Minifters, meets in feverall roomes. The Noblemen, with Mr. Alexander Henderfone and Mr. D. Dpckfon,] refolves the renewing of the old Covenant for religion. A little incling of this is given out at firft to the reft. Mr. D. D. is imployed in the Colledge church to preach, where, in a great congregation before noone, he fhews the expediency of renewing the Covenant. Mr. H. Rollock feconds that motion, with amplification, in the afternoon. In the Grayfriars, Mr. John Aclamfone ftrykes on the fame firing before noone. Mr. Andrew Ramfay, in the afternoon, for fpareing, was miffiked. The two other kirks are not regarded. Mr. Henrie's (4) plainnefs made me fufpe6l their intention, in this new Covenant, to make us for-fwear Bifhops and Ceremonies in our meeting. I had discovered the fame minde in fome, alledging over and over, that the Achan of our land was the breach of our Covenant, in admitting, againft the oath of our nation, the government of Bifhops and Articles of Perth. To this I gave fo fharpe and fo modeft a reply, that excluded thereafter this motion from this meeting. Bot I was filled with fear and great perplexity, left the bond, whilk I found was in conceaving, Ihould containe any fuch claufes; for this I thought would inevitably open a gape, and make a prefent divilion in the Miniftry, which was the earneft defyre and fure victory of the Bifhops. This I caufed remon-ftrate to the Noblemen whilk they took well, and made Loudon lhew me and Mr. George Young, whom I had fent to Loudon to declare my fears, their write, which was fcrolled, profeffing their minde to give us all contentment, and rather to deftroy it, then that thereby any rent fhould be made amongft us. The write had three parts; Firft, the old Covenant, word by word, as ye have it in the Harmony of Confeffions, after our Confeffion of Faith ; the nixt part confifts of A6ts of Parliament, whilk all are for our Confeffion againft Poperie; the Third lies ane application to the prefent cafe: in this was all the difficulty; for there was indeed claufes in it requiring the fufpenfion of our practife, (4) This evidently refers to Mr. Henry Rollock, one of the Alinisters of Edinburgh, and not, as in the former edition, to fr Mr. Henderson."1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 53 then of our approbation of Bifhops and Ceremonies. After rea-foning, it was yielded to me, to change this claufe, to forbear pra6tice. I fhew it was ever my minde, fince I was a minifter; bot not to approve in judgment, it was impoflible till I was other-wife informed. So they required bot my difallowance of the corruption of the Bifhops government; whereunto I yielded. Some other claufes alfo, whilk might have feemed to import a Defence in armes againft the King, this I could not yield to in any imaginable cafe ; for the grounds I had learned from Mon-fieur Cameron (5) I had not yet leafure to try; fo, for the prefent, I could fubfcryve nothing whilk was againft my minde. Thefe were alfo changed; fo that no word, I hope, remaines in this write, whilk, in any congruitie, can be drawne againft the Prince ; bot many fentences are expreffly to the contrare : fo in thir two poynts of my feares, Loudon, by his wifdome and equity, gave me contentment. This courtefie was due to me ; both becaufe they hoped what would content my fcrupulous minde, might be appearance fatiffie others who were of my judgement, whereof there was a great number; as alfo for the regard to my felfe, to whom they profeffe fome refpe£t for my paines in this caufe, not only in my firft write of Queries, bot alfo of my fecond of the Parallell, whereby they efteemed their caufe fomewhat furthered ; befyde that they expe6ted, that I being fatiffied, would be an inftrument to give others contentment, as fince they have found. My Lord Caflills had my fcruple anent the Defence with armes. He fent for me; bot I efchewed to confirme him in that whilk he profefled he had from Monfieur Cameron. He gott in a claufe in the write whilk contented his minde. Thus we being contented, they ventured yefterday to prefent it to our meeting. Rothus, Loudon, Aldbarr, and others come downe. They read it firft in private to a number of us who were Commiffioners for Prefbytries, and thereafter to all. The objections which were moved by fome few were foon fatiffied: all being interrogate, man be man, gave their hearty affent; only fome three or four brether of Angus, who had fworne obedience to the Bifhop, could not finde how to difpenfe with their pra6tife and oath. My Lord Rothus finding our great harmony, departed with the (5) Mr. John Cameron, an eminent Protestant Divine, who resided abroad during the chief part of his life. He was Professor of Divinity at Saumur, previous to the short period that he held the office of Principal of the University of G1 asgow. He died at jMontauban^ in 1625.54 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. profeflion of great joy: for this union was the great pillar of the caufe; and it could never have been obtained, if diftra6tion had been in the miniftry who had fubfcribed the former fupplication, whilk mifchance was much feared ; and, indeed, great occafion had the imprudency and rigidity of the firfl formers of that write given of thefe feares. It is expected that this day the hands of all eftates fhall be put to it, and thereafter a declaration fhall be made of our innocency in this whole proceeding, and of the in-juftice of the Bifhops, with ane earneft defvre to have our Prince informed in the truth of this caufe, be way of the mod humble Supplication. To-morrow, in Stirling, is expe6ted a frequent Counfell, where there is hope that the Counfell will lay the wyte of all thir evills upon the B[ifhops] back. What will be next, the Lord knows! we are to humble our felves in fafting • and prayer. It becomes yow weill there, and all the Reformed churches over fea, to commend our caufe heartily to God, as we have oft done for yow in the like cafe. We have no affurance yet or warrand that any one line of the Booke fhall be remitted, bot hopes are made of withdrawing both Liturgie, and Canons, and Commiffion, and all, if we would let the Bifhops alone ; bot the moft part is peremptory refolved not to endure any longer their lawlefTe tyrannie. A Narration of the Proceedings from the 21st of December [1637,] to the [24th of february 1638.] The Lords of Secret Councell having receaved from the Supplicants their petitions, complaints, bill, and declinator of Bifhops, at Dalkeith, the 21st December, promifeing to reprefent thefamen to his Majefties royall confideration, as concerning matters of that confequence wherein they could not determine by them-felves ; their Lordfhips were then preffed earneflly by the Supplicants, not only to recommend thefe, bot to intreat my Lords Theafaurer and Privie Seall to carry the fupplications, &c. and informe his Majeftie in thefe matters ; which did well befitt their places, being the greateft affaires that ever had fallen within the compafs of their confiderations; becaufe a dumb Information, though never fo exa6l, was not capable of replyes, nor could it anticipat fuch doubts as his Majeftie might propone. This de-fyre was often repeated in privat to my Lords Thefaurer and Privie Seall, by diverfe of the Supplicants, with a demonitration1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 55 of thefe evills which might follow from his Majefties want of juft information and knowledge of the true ftate of bufinefs here. The longing defyre of the Supplicants for their anfwer made them appoint fome of their number to attend at Edinburgh, for getting and giving notice of my Lord Thefaurer his returne from England; and upon advertifement that he was expected about the 12th or 14th of February, many of the Supplicants reforted hither; who being together at his coming to Edinburgh, February 15th, and expe6ling then anfwer to their fupplications, two of their number were fent to enquire for the fame. Being with Privie Seall, his Lordfhip denyed his haying anfwer to them, or that he knew any certaine tyme when they might expe6l the fame, or by whom ; only he believed they fhould have it fhortly. He acknowledged not that the Counfell had recommended to him the carrying, and informing of his Majeflie anent the fupplications; bot that his Majeflie had receaved the fupplications, and confidered them. The Thefaurer and Privie Seall taxing the petitioners for impatience in waiting his Majefties anfwer, were anfvvered, It was now near half ane year fince the firft fupplication was delivered to the Counfell in September, and the matter concerning wrong done to Religion ought to have been fpeedily repaired by his Majeflie as being the Lord's deputy over his people, efpecially for prefervation of that Religion where-unto himfelf is fubject as well as the people, God haveing all-wayes expreft fuch difpleafure at the corruption of his true wor-fhip, or introduceing any feed of fuperflition or idolatry, which was alwayes informed of thefe things they petitioned againft; that they are confident they would have obtained ane fpeedier redrefle from fo good and religious a prince, if his Majeflie had been truely informed, or not prevented by fuch fuggeftions as excufed, or covered the unfoundnefs of thefe Books and wicked-nefs of thefe other novations; and affured, That if the matter had only concerned their own lives and fortunes, they would have patiently endured the longeft delay of his Majefties refo-lution; bot this matter might excufe importunity in them, and required expedition from his Majeflie. They finding my Lord Thefaurer fpare to difcover any thing concerning this bufinefs, parted, to make account of their obfcure anfwer. On the 16th, fome of the Supplicants got notice of ane proclamation to be made, which contained his Majefties approbation of the Service Book, as only fitt for the ufe of the Holy Church, and taking on himfelf the caufing forme it; a difpenfing with56 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. the nobility and gentry for their bygone meetings; and a difcharge of all the meetings hereafter, under the paine of treafon. Whereupon four or five of the fupplicants were fent from the reft, to my Lords Thefaurer and Privie Seall; who meeting firft with my Lord Privie Seall, and difclofing to him the tennor of the fup-plication, he feemed unwilling to fpeak any thing thereof, pro-feflmg he had no commiffion, and knew nothing of that bufinefs. Going to my Lord Thefaurer, and expreffing their grieff at the faid proclamation, they defyred to know the truth of him; who refufed to make known to any what he was commanded to deliver to the Counfell only; and keeping all very clofe, feemed to preffe the neceffitie of inhibiting meetings, and that by proclamation. It was anfuered, That the obedience of the charge was the way to let all thefe evills come upon them, wherewith the Church and State were threatened; for they mett together to advyfe anent fupplicating and confulting about the beft wayes for preventing evills ; and as the end was lawfull, fo had they never fallen in diforders at their meetings neither in word nor action, bot had alwayes concurred in electing the beft and humbleft motions, reftraining thefe that were rude; which would have appeared and given offence, if ilk fhyre had petitioned apart; and if they Ihould ftay at home, what could they doe, bot every one indure what foever was impofed, and fo the Church and State to fuffer. Thefe returning to the reft of their number, they all refolved to fend four or five to Stirling, to give information to the Counfel-lors concerning the proclamation, as after follows. Firft, That the Supplicants had been from tyme to tyme put in good hope of a gracious anfwer, efpecially by the Act of Counfell in Auguft laft, declareing, that the buying of the Service Book, and not the ufe-ing of it, was only intended, and by his Majefties declaration in December laft; bot by this proclamation, their former hopes would be turned into feares. Secondly, That the proclaming of a difpenfation to the Supplicants, for that which they were afluered they were doeing in duty both to God and his Majeftie, would either make his mercy mifregarded, or force them to con-demne their own doeings, fo juftifiable before God and the world. Thirdly, That the prohibiting of fuch like peaceable proceedings, under the paine of treafon, would make the Supplicants either incurre the imputation of treafon, or elfe be caften all into the hands of the adverfaries, and call themfelves loofe of religion, liberty and peace, againft the duty which they owe to God,1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 57 the Church, and the Country. Fourthly, That, contrare to the King's Majefties declaration in December laft, this proclamation transferred the guilt of thefe novations from the Prelats upon the King's Majeftie ; not that he can be judged the author thereof, bot that they may efcape cenfure ; whereby it is hard to fay, whether his Majeftie be more di(honoured, or juftice frustrate, or his Majefties good fubje6ts difappointed. Fifthly, That the Supplicants tremble, that after fo many fupplications and declarations, bearing the manifold feeds of herefie, fuperftition and idolatry, to be contained in the Service Book, it fhould be declared, be proclamation, to be the forme of God's publick worftiip, and the meane of maintaining true religion, and holding out of fuperftition; which muft make the fubje6ts either receive what their confciences doe condemne, or directly oppofe themfelves againft his Majefties proclamation. Sixthly, Since that many worthie Counfellers hath regrated the palling of the firft Act in favours of the Service Book, and hath made many excufes for the famen, the Supplicants are confident, that having a new occaiion of more mature deliberation, they would rather give counfell to his Majeftie to choofe a courfe that may give fatiffa6lion to the defire of his good people, than by confirming fo fummar a concluiion, greive many, wound their own hearts, and work further difturbance in the church and countrey. The Thefaurer and Privie Seall hearing, that fome were to be dire6ted to Stirling, fent for three or foure of the Supplicants ; and underftanding their refolution, preafed to diflwade the famen : bot thefe fhowes the neceffity they conceaved thereof, and that for preventing the inconvenience of the proclamation, which would prove fo hurtfull, falling upon thefe particulars in the Information, and upon the report, that the Burrows were excluded from the difpenfation offered to the Nobility and Gentry by the proclamation, that a criminall purfute might be intended againft Edinburgh, did fhow a refolution in the whole Supplicants, to intend a criminall purfute againft the Bifhops and their followers, as foone as the other Ihould be wakened, and that for fclandering of fo many of the faithfull fubjedls to be mutinous and rebellious for oppofeing innovations brought in religion by them againft the lawes, and their exercifeing of the judicatories not eftablifhed by Parliament, to the heavy oppref-lion of the Hedges ; for the which faults, as in law, their lives could not efcape, fo thefe of Edinburgh did not fall within compafs of law for life or fyne, conlidering how little they did,58 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. how great evills were inforced upon them, and what was their Magiftrats dealing towards them. The Supplicants, upon better advyfement, fand a neceffity of ufeing a declinator at Stirling, left there the Bifhops Ihould fitt in judgement, and give out any Act in that buffineffe, wherein they were declared parties, and ought to be declyned; refolving to propon the faid declinator only by two of their number. They were advertifed upon Son-day in the morning, that fome of the Bifhops followers had faid, that the proclamation would inhibit any of the Supplicants to appear where the Counfell fatt; that if they fhould prefent the declinator, they Ihould be put faft ; which made the Supplicants to determine to goe together to Stirling, and to be prefent in the towne at the proponing thereof; thinking, that being together, they were more able to give the Counfell information and fatif-fa6tion, then by fo few, which might be dazaled with difficulties of new propofitions and a6lions not expe6led. And few houres after this refolution, fome of the Supplicants, by permiffion of the reft, declared the fame to my Lords Thefaurer and Privie Seall for preventing of miftake ; who immediately fent for foure of the Supplicants, wifhing them to change their refolution of going to Stirling, and expoftulating with them for the way of carrying their buffinefs, alleadged, If the Supplicants had followed their advyfe in fupplicating apart, and againft the Book of Common-Prayer, Canons and High Commiftion only, it had fucceeded better with them; they might have petitioned for the reft of their greevances, after once hearing and proveing fully their firft complaints ; that, by appearance, the King would never hear them fo long as they complained upon Bifhops ; and affured, that the Supplicants did now fee their own error in not following their former advyfe. It wes anfwered, That being a publick buffinefs, which concernes the whole kingdome, and the matters of fuch confequence, it could not be carried in fo private a way as your Lordfhips propofed ; the matter being fuch as religion and policy were extremely wronged, the fubje6ts thereat grieved, behooved to have recourfe to their Prince, for commanding redreffe by the ordinar courfe of law, which hath been alwayes cuftomable to fubje6ts in the lyke cafe ; and if the whole Supplicants had been fo truftfull in a matter fo great and univerfall, as if it had been any of their own particulars, their Lordfhips could bot engaged life, fortouns and honour, for a good fuccefTe to follow their advyfe ; and though their fuppli-cations being reftrained, as your Lordfhips defyred, might gett1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 59 audience, yet if, after fupplicating againft thefe other evills which are the root that hath produced fuch fruits, his Majeftie Ihould then refufe to hear any further, would it not grieved them to fee the fubje6ls fuffer by the relying upon unpauned truft, and the whole envy tranfferred from the Bifhops upon their own heads ? They aiking them, What courfe the Supplicants would take? were anfuered,- They would propone their declinator at Stirling for the reafons forfaids. They faying, It will be refufed, were anfuered, The Supplicants would then proteft for ane im-mediat courfe to his Majeftie, upon their deny all of juftice, and prefent their fupplications to his Majefties felf. They doubting his Majeftie will accept the famen, were anfwered, The Supplicants would doe their duty, and committ the event to God Almighty, - who is fufficiently able to prote6l his own caufe, and their juft proceedings. Thus parting, and returning to the reft of the Supplicants, they appointed foure or five of their number to goe very tymely to Stirling, for preventing the Thefaurer and Privie Seall their accuftomed diligence, in omitting no meanes that might conduce to their ends; and alfo the Counfell-day was appointed to be the following Tuefday at ten o'clock. Yet was the Lord Thefaurer and Privie Seall on horfeback be two o'clock, and in Stirling be eight in the morning on Monday the 19th ; bot were outridden be fome of the Supplicants, whofe being before them made them expe6t the coming of the reft, and fo conveened all the Counsellors prefent in the toune to haften out the proclamation before their coming. The Counfellors then prefent could not make a quorum ; yet did they proceed with their proclamation at the mercat croffe by ten o'clock, where the Supplicants made proteftation. The reft of the Supplicants coming after noone, and hearing of the proclamation, went to the Thefaurer, Privie Seall, and other Officers of State, requiring a fight of the proclamation, that they might advyfe with the fame ; who denyed any fight thereof till it ftiould be proclaimed in other places; bot by relation, they fmoothing the contents thereof, and differing much from others who heard it read at the croffe, made the Supplicants uncertaine what it contained ; who refolveing to leave no lawfull meanes unaffayed, fent one of their number to the Clerk of Counfell, requireing only a fight of the proclamation for their perufall; upon whofe refufeall, inftruments were taken. The Counfellors grudged to finde fo many to refort there to Stirling, who had come very60 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. frequently from all the neareft adjacent places, and that upon very fmall advertifement. The Thefaurer and Privie Seall fent for fome of the Supplicants ; who being afked, What they were minded to doe ? They fhewed them they would ufe a declinator, and, in cafe that were refufed, a proteftation, as they told them at Edinburgh. They renewing their often repeated motions of divifion without fucceffe, were earneft, that the Supplicants fhould remove all out of the toune, feeing they were to doe no more in that buffinefs. The Supplicants obje6ted the ratifieing of the proclamation in Counfell, which as yet wanted that warrand; they affured them of the contrare very firmely, as alfo gave affureance that no prejudice fhould be offered to thefe who prefented the declinator or proteftation. Whereupon they undertook to deale with the reft of the Supplicants ; who being conveened in the Kirk, filled the fame; and with very great difficultie, obtained their confent to remove after dinner toward Edinburgh, upon the relation of the affureance they had gotten the proclamation fhould not be ratified in Counfell; and having appointed fome few of their number to flay, and propone the declinator and proteftation forfaid. After dinner, as they were going to Edinburgh, two or three of the Supplicants went to the Thefaurer and Privie Seall, having fome other Counsellors with them, and defyred their flay fhould not be interpreted to proceed from contempt, for they could not obtaine fight of the proclamation, neither from their Lordfhips, nor from their clerk ; having afked it, and taken inftruments of his refufall, thereby to be informed what it in-joyned; and although it had no legall ftrength, yet conceaving it to be a declaration of his Majefties minde, which they had been, and would be alwayes moft willing to obtemper, without prejudice of the caufe they had in hand, they were refolved to part. When the noblemen were gone, the Counfellors went to Counfell in the Caftle of Stirling at foure a'clock, where two of the Supplicants gave in the declinator; which being refufed, contrare to the Act of Counfell at Dalkeith, they protefted, and offered to take inftruments in the notar's hand: and being reproached, that they brought in common notars before the Counfell, they offered to take inftruments in the clerk of Counfell's hands, which he refufed; whereupon they took inftruments in their own writers hands. That night the Counfell ratified the proclamation. One who had the informations, and by the fore-mentioned promife was put in fecurity, hearing thereof, caufed delyver fome of them the nixt morning to fome Counfellors1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 61 there that moft relifhed religion, and befl know the Service Book ; who being informed, fand themfelves infnared by their confent, and was heavily grieved. The proclamation was made at Linlithgow upon Wednesday the 21 ft of February, where proteftation was made, as at Stirling, by three or foure of the Supplicants ; and at Edinburgh on Thurfday the 22d of February, where a great many noblemen, barrons, minifters, and others, fupplicants, ftanding within and about the Crofie, after the proclamation was read, the proteftation was alfo read publickly, and inftruments taken in the hands of notars. On Fryday the 23d, the number of the noblemen and others being increafed, at their meeting they treafled [traced] the fug-geftion to fundry of the Supplicants labouring divided Supplications, which was generally diflyked, and ane new dealing with the Counfell by way of fupplication, reftrained to the Service Book, Canons and high Commiflion, which was apprehended by very few. This made all confider the particular condition and former proceedings of thefe prime ftatefmen, principall fuggef-tors of fuch motions : and although the Thefaurer and Privie Seall, both for the greatnefs of their fortouns and hereditarie conditions, were confiderable with the chiefeft of this land, as deeply intereft in the good of this ftate, which, with their approved underftanding, might induce the expectation of all need-full care and faithfull carriage befeeming their place, intereft, and knowledge ; and although they feemed extreamly grieved for their prefent evills, and, by frequent information, fully per-ceaved the root whence they flow, yet the prefervation of their places and credit with his Majeftie, by appearance hath made them forbear to doe or informe fully about thefe who they thought was fo acceptable to his Majeftie; and many of the Biihops being the yoke fellows with them in burden of the ftate, and others of that minde watching over their wayes, ready to informe againft them for any thing that appears not conduceable to their end, and obtaining folicitations from perfones of power in their own favours to the faid ftatefmen, hes made them all this while to labour rather the quenching of the paine, then the cureing of the difeafe, and to make a diverfion from the root of evills by a fair addreffe of thefe Supplicants, for the prefent pruneing of the branches. All their proceedings in this bufiinefs being fully confidered, was found to intend this end, fuch complying being fitter for the fervants of a perfon, then of ane ftate. Some of62 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. them, by words and a6tions, fo much laboured amidft right and wrong, as they will, except they mend it, get the like recom-pence to them, who indeavour reconciliation betwixt Proteftants and Papifts, which is neither thanks nor truft from either, as our own late experience proveth. Bifhops had their Commis-faries. To Mr. William Spang. April 5th [1638.] cousine, Thir are in fuch hafle, that they cannot be fatiffa6tory. I fent yow by William Cuninghame, with one Gibfon of Leith, two double pieces and a five merk piece : before we be miferable, I wifli my debts were paid. Alfo I fent yow two quarts of Rofa Solis, that once yet ere we die ye may drink my good health. Your letters are more unfrequent to me then ordinary ; ye know the caufe. The doubles of the King's proclamation, and the coun-trey's proteftation, with the newly fubfcryved Covenant, I would have fent to yow, according to my promife in my laft, had not Mr. William Wilkie affured me that he would have them at yow before this. The great bufinefs among us fince that tyme hes been, to have that Confeffion fubfcryved be all hands ; and through all hands almoft hes it gone. Of Noblemen at home, who are not counfellors or papifts, unto which it was not offered, I think they be within foure or five who hes not fubfcryved. All the Shyres have fubfcryved, by their Commiffioners; and all the Tounes except Aberdeen, St. Andrews, and Craill; yea, the particular gentlemen, burgefles and minifters have put to their hands; and the parifhes throughout the whole countrey, where the Minifters could be perfuaded, on a Sabbath day, all have publickly, with ane uplifted hand, man and woman, fworn it. Mr. William Anan himfelf hes thus farre proceeded, to all our admiration ; our marvell is increafed, when he is faid to repent it, and to fay, he was conftrained to doe what he did : the man is fo refolute, and the oathes of this wryte are fo frequent, clear, and deep, that who hes taken them, I think, he cannot readily recall them. I hear for truth, that Mr. William is put in a great dumpe, and, after fome trouble both of minde and body, hes gone to Glafgow and Edinburgh ; to what purpofe I cannot yet fay. I fufpect the town of Air's motion to him to confent to receave a helper, which they would name, and1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 63 provide him, without any diminution to his ftipend, hes troubled him more then anything elfe ; for they feem peremptor to have a minifter conjun6t with him, and that, either Mr. Robert Blair or Mr. George Dumbar their old minifter, or fuch a man who will bear down Mr. William, and fo kill him when he hes loft the Bifhops his old freinds. This peremptory and unexpe6l-ed motion, I fear, is the caufe of his perplexity and change, if he doe make any. The greateft oppolites in the Weft to this fubfcription are our friends in Glafgow: all the Colledge without exception; Mr. John Maxwell, Mr. John Bell younger, and Mr. Zacharie, they are not only withdrawers of their hands, bot all of them pathetick reafoners againft it. How this comes I will not fay, bot I have my own thoughts ; yet old Mr. John Bell and Mr. Robert Wilkie are pafiionately for it, albeit half derided by the other as fimple fooles : it is like to fall out evill among them. The body of the Burgeffes hes fubfcryved. My Lord Boyd, old Blair, Keir, Mr. David Dick, Mr. Michael Wallace, and I, went in, as Commiflioners from the meeting of Edinburgh, to deal with the Colledge and Minifters to joyne with the reft: bot I forefaw it was in vaine ; for no reafoning could move any of them to paffe from the fmalleft of their fcruples, which yet they multiplied. We left them refolved to celebrate the Communion on Pafche day, in the High Church, kneeling ; bot Mr. Robert Wilkie and Mr. John Bell are refolved to pafle that day, and the next Sabbath to celebrate, fitting, in the Laigh Kirke. After our departure with fmall contentment, they did agree to delay all celebration for a tyme, and fo did intimate to the people, from pulpit; bot when it was found that Mr. John Bell and Mr Robert Wilkie would delay only Pafche day, and no longer, Mr. John Maxwell and young Mr. John Bell thinking their credit interefted in ceeding this farr, made intimation to the people at the evening prayers on Saturday, to come the morne to the Communion in the High Church; fome few bafe people did come, and filled fome four or fyve tables, who were ferved by the Principall, and Mr. John Maxwell. The nixt Saturday, Mr. David Dickfone had the preparation fermon in the Laigh Church, and Mr. John Maxwell in the High: to the one's fermon, all flocked who could throng in ; to the other's much fewer. This, I fear, be a proclamation of redde warre among the clergy of that towne; bot the pley I thinke fhall be fhortly reedde.64 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. To Aberdeen the burrows fent Mr. Robert Barclay proveft of Irwine, 'and the Clerk of Dundee, in commiffion ; bot thir people, by the MarquelTe of Huntley's inftigation, and the Northland Bifhops, were fo preoccupied, that willfully, without allegation of reafon, they refufed. Their Doctors for the moft part are favourers of the Books; and how farr our folks of Glafgow, or any non-fubfcryvers, are oppofit to the Books, I cannot fpeak much for the prefent. D[octor] Baron hes given out fomething in write for the Booke, whereof I am forrie ; not for the write it felf, for if the piece I faw be it, it is a very poor one, that will never hurt our caufe, bot becaufe I tender that man's estimation as one who was half deligned to our Theologick pro-feffion in Glafgow, which he can never attain to with any tol-lerable contentment of our country, were he ane angell, if once he have fyled paper in maintainance of the Booke. Edinburgh continues conftant. Mr. Henry [Rollock] and Mr. Andrew [Ramfay,] yea, Mr. Robert Blair, and Mr. James Hamilton, and Mr. John Livingftone, preaches there to the peoples heart. Mr. Matthew Weems in the Canongate, Mr. Forfair in North-Leith, all the Colledge, Principal D. Sharpe, Regentes, [and] all the Schollars, (except Mr. Robert Rankine and Mr. John Broune, with fome few boyes with them,) have fubfcryved and fworae. The Minifters of Stirling, before the Lords of Seffion, are inveighing dayly againft our Bifhops. St. Andrews itfelf, we hear, for the moft part, hes fubfcryved. What fhall be the end, God knows! The Counfell fent to court my Lord Orbiftone with thir in-ftru6tions, here inclofed. The Noblemen fent Mr. John Livingftone before him, with what inftru6tions I know not; bot it was fore againft my minde that he fhould be imployed at this tyme, being a Book man, a preacher rigide and paflionate, and, which was worft, ftanding under the fentence of excommunication of the Irifh Church. He was not at Court four houres till the King fpoke of his coming, of the way and manner of his voyage : this made him to pofte back, after one day's, at moft, lurking at London. It is thought that Orbiftone, who overtook him by the way and outrode him, behooved to be the informer ; which will impair much of that truft which Orbiftone hitherto did in-joy amongft us. The noblemen drew up a common letter, to be prefented by the Earle of Haddington to the Duke, Marques, and Morton, conjunctly, intreating them, if they thought to undertake the prefentment of their Supplications to the King. The1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 65 letter and fupplication I will ftryve to fend to you with the nixt; thir were not ready when Mr. John Livingfton went away. Orbiftone at his returne filled the countrey with good news ; but we fand thereafter, that all refolved on the King's letters calling up Roxburgh and the Thefaurer, and my Lord of Lome, for to confult before any farder was proceeded in that matter, according to one of the articles of thefe inftru6lions which Orbiftone carryed up, and did nothing pleafe the countrey; for we thought them bot only complements, and inclyning to cenfure our meetings of unlawfullnefs. However, we are informed, that the bell lawers, both Hope, Nicolfone, and Stewart, being con-fulted by the King, does declare all our bypalt proceedings to be legall. The three Counfellors(6) are all to Court; we are full of feares : the Thefaurer hes loft all his truft with us; Privie Seall never had any; we tremble for Lome, that the King either perfuade him to goe his way, or finde him eirands at Court, for a long tyme. Brechin and RolTe are both to Court, the two moft unhappy of all the Bifhops. It is faid, that Roffe, before he went from home, was affrighted with the boyes who burnt the Service Book where he was ; this made him flippe away difaguyfed over the mounts. It feems, according to Orbifton's inftruction, that the King hes called up thefe two of the clergy as his former informers. We are praying to God, and wifhes you to concurr with us, that this affaire now in the balance may have a fair end : Our country is at the poynt of breaking loufe; our lawes this twelve moneth hes been filent; diverfe mifregards their creditors; our Highlands are making ready their armes, and fome begun to murder their neighbours. Dowglafs, Aber-corne, and Semple, are openly arming among us ; readily after their example other Noblemen will provide prefently their houfes with mufquett, picks, powder and lead. We hope, that fince the Palatine is gone to Germany, and the King has fent to Ham-brugh to renew the league with Sweden, fince the prentifes of London, as we heare, does force the delyverance of Canterburie's prifoners, and fundry there intends a legall procefle againft the Bifhops ufurpations, we hope that a peaceable decifion may come from Court; yet we feare God let us not go fo foon out of the fnare, fo fmall hitherto hes been our repentance; the violence alfo, which we fee breathed out of the Bifhops and their fol- (6) The three Councillors here named, were the Earl of Traquair, Treasurer, the Earl of Roxburghe, Lord Privy Seal, and the Lord Lome, better known by his subsequent title as Marquis of Argyle. VOL. I. E66 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. lowers mouths, againft their oppofites, and the countrey's un-diffembled rage againft them, as the only authors and contryv-ers of all this danger, I fear it end not fmoothly. Mr. Robert Hammilton, and Mr. John Lindfay, lies been very ill ufed in Lanerick, by the women, as I doubt not Mr. William Wilkie will informe yow. Mr. Robert Hammilton is fully refolved to be revenged for his wounds ; and for this end, wrote fharply to the Thefaurer and Chancellour, yet all lyes oyer; this fame may further the mifchief. I have made all the Colledge wryte to yow for a Rituale Ro-manum, Miffale, Breviarium, and Pontificale. I pray yow, be-caufe I have prefent ufe of them, faile not to purchafe them fair and lately printed, for we have old Sarum ; alfo Jofephus Vice-comes de Ritibus Baptifmi, etc.; take my aflureance, that for thefe the Colledge will give yow thanks, and I alfo. The Lord be with yow ; and, pray for us. [To Dr. Strang, Principal of the University of Glasgow.] Reverend and Dear Brother, Your Letter to me was moft acceptable; that ye thought not good to conferr with me by write, I likewayes approve ; for of that kinde of jangling I am over weary. Glad fhould I have been to have come unto yow wherever ye had defired, if fo I had conceaved any hope to doe yow pleafure; but it was another, and not your felfe, who required me to come to Glafgow that day, when I could not well winn ; and the laft voyage I made to that place, for the like end, was allutterly fruitlefs, for there I fand my felf allutterly unable to fatiffie any of thefe brethren, in any the leift of their objections againft our late Confefiion; bot I thank God that ye are come much nearer, by thefe good means ye name of your reading and prayer: I am confident, upon the continuance of the fame, that ye fhall come on that little ftep which remaines; and, if it might be the will of God, from my heart I wifti, fo foon as is poflible, to fee yow come clean over, where fo many of us are who loves yow dearly, and whom ye alike doe love. Our maine feare to have our religion loft, our throats cutted, our poor countrey made ane Englifli province, to be difpofed upon for ever hereafter at the will of a Bifhope of Canterburie; thir our feares are builded mainely1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 67 upon the withdrawing of our brethren's hands and countenances from us, in that courfe which we conceave to be moll neceffare at this tyme. Our hopes, under God, which we have, to croffe the undermyneTs of our whole religion and civill liberties alfo, is in the univerfall harmonie and conjundtion of all brethren. Your hand I took ever to be of efpeciall importance ; I know not only the deferved dependance which many brethren had upon yow, bot your great eftimation and abilities whereby this good caufe might be furthered, if ye had joyned: I think it is one of the greatefl occafions that ever ye had in your life, or lhall have to your death, to doe God, our Church, our Country, a peice of good fervice. The declaration of your minde before all the world, let be thefe yow name, in the poynts ye expreffe, readily will be granted; bot a band in write in the termes ye fett downe, I fear be not yielded: fo farr as I know, the like was not craved of any. The firft part of it, That yow did fubfcryve fo farr as that Confeffionwas not prejudiciall to the King's authority, the office of Epifcopall government it felf, and that power which is given to Bifhops by lawfull Affemblies and Parliaments, and in fo fan-as we are bound to withftand all innovations in the worlhip of God, contrare to his written word, and the Confeffion of Faith of the Church of Scotland, this I think it very needlefs to crave ; for if ye faw any thing into this Covenant, which, either in expreffe termes, or by any good confequence, could inferr the contradi6tion of any of thefe things ye name, ye might not in any termes, on any expofition or limitation, offer to fubfcryve it. I doe not only believe that there is no word into it that makes againft the King's full authority, fo farr as either religion or reafon can extend it, or againft the office of Bifhops, or any power they have by any lawfull Affemblie or Parliament; or that by this write we are oblidged to oppofe any novation, or any thing at all which is not contrare to God's word : not only I believe this, bot hes profeffed fo much before the whole meeting at Edinburgh, oft both in word and write, without the leaft appearance of contradi6lion of any to this houre. Bot for me to have craved this much under any their hands, I thought it needlefs, and very inexpedient for them to have granted; for it had been ane expreffe granting in write, to be regiftrate to the world's end, that they thought there was just occafion given to fufpe6t that, in that write, there was fomething which truely did oppofe the King's authoritie, etc. If any prefently, or hereafter, fhall abufe any claufe of this write, to overthrow the King's authoritie, &c.68 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. as many abufes Scriptures themfelves to their own bad intentions, I think it abundantly contents me, that I can make it evident, not only that at my fubfcription I profeffed, by word and write, that I did believe there could no fuch thing be deduced from that write, of which profeffion I have many famous witnefles; bot the chief ground of my fatiffaction in this cafe is, that I can make it evident before the world, that the write hes no fuch errors, elfe would I never have fubfcribed it. So, Brother, in my poor judgement, the firft part of your defy re is not meet to be fought; as for the other, that requires the admitting of a Pro-teftation to pra6life conformitie, in cafe of deprivation. Though the fear of the Books be not removed, however I think, in that cafe, ye will be very loath to conforme upon any danger that is likely to come, yet, in my minde, it might be eafily obtained, by Duchall or Mr. Matthew, from the prime of the Nobility, to take that your fubfcription, with ane exprefle declaration, albeit, no written proteftation which they fliould fubfcryve, that ye fliould be permitted, in cafe of a danger, which your con-fcience thought reall and true, of prefent deprivation, to doe in Perth Articles as ye thought expedient, without any note of infamy or perjurie. For my own part I was not minded, on any hazard whatfomever, to pra6tife kneeling, fo long as the danger or feare of thir late novations did remaine, whether this late oath had been taken or not; and this feare, I think, cannot be removed without a lawfull AlTembly or Parliament; fo that indeed I take all fubfcryvers to be oblilhed to abftaine from kneeling, &c., on whatfoever hazard, till that terme at leilt be pall, and my felfe I finde obliflied to abftaine poffibily longer, I meane ever, till the feare of thir dangerous innovations be away, whereto I take the Articles of Perth to be now indu6tive and fo fcan-dalous; which juft fear cannot anywayes be removed by the difcharge of the books by proclamation, yea readily not by Affem-blies or Parliaments. However, I take all fubfcryvers, after the allowance of the firft AlTembly and Parliament, to be as free in the matters of Perth as they were before their fubfcription ; and ye who hes obtained to fubfcryve with the refervation ye crave, to be free in your pra6life of thefe Articles even before either AlTembly or Parliament: this freedome, I thinke, your fubfcription takes not away, being taken with that limitation proponed ; for my own part I would concurr to have it freely granted to you, hopeing that ye would not ftand upon the formalitie of a publick write, if ye obtaine the witneffing by word of fo many1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 69 and fo famous men as ye could require : this I take to be the only thing whereon ye ftand, which I think may be obtained to you mofl readily. As for formalities ye wont not to be carefull: I am hopefull, when the pra6life of Conformitie is put in your will, ye will not be flout for it, if ye fee that the urgeing of it is mainely to put away the beft and ablefl oppofites to popery out of the land ; and that their removers are avowing, fo fad as they can, the groffeft poynts of popery, in print, with applaufe and advancement for that only caufe ; if ye fee that, I know ye have a tender heart and will not for your life, let be places, doe any thing which may truely further fo wicked a plott. That it is no lefTe then popery in grofle which the Canterburian faction is now aiming at, I flryve to fhew in thir Quseries which here I fend you ; I doe it farther in another little write of Paralelle of our Service with the Mafie and Breviarie, which I fhall fend yow if ye like this. However, doe what ye will, fubfcryve or not fubfcryve, be affured of my high eftimation of yow, and affection to yow, and confidence of your zeall and orthodoxie; trailing that when the fubfcryvers of this Covenant are made away, either banifhed, or made foulie to recant, which I feare lhortly, (if God avert not,) that ye and fundry other of your brethren fhall begin where we have left, and be ready with your blood to feall the truth of God as fervently as the forwardefl of us. Only let me intreat you moft earneflly, as ye would refrefh my heart Angularly, fubfcryve this write fo fhortly as ye can with any condition ye can obtain from your Commiifioners : there is no hand now in Scotland which I doe fo much defire at it as yours. Thir in great hafle and confufion as your prefiing bearer can fhew. The Lord be with yow, dear and loving Brother, and help us ; for, except he concurr with his extraordinary mercy, I take the religion, libertie, and peace of our land, houghed and clean overthrown for our dayes. So I reft, Your loving Brother. [To Mr. William Spang. ] Reverend and Well-Beloved Brother, I writt to you my laft with James Brown of Saltcots ; after a quarter of a yeeres expectation, I receaved your lafl; I was not content of your fo long delay. You fee in fo dangerous a tyme you want not mine of the hiefl purpofes; I feare I muft now70 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. leave off to write, leafl by the King's fhippes my letters be intercepted. After the departure of Privie Seale and the Thefaurer, Lome alfo went up. He was fent for by a privie miffive, not by a letter to the Counfell, as the other two: his going was againfl the heart of many his friends ; yet he was peremptor to obey. There followed the Chancellour, Prefident, Regifler, Rofle, Brechin, Galloway ; the Marques Ihortly after called up for Qr-befloun. We were all long in fufpence for newes: at lafl we heard of the violent and wicked counfell of Roffe and Chancellour, fhewing, that a partie might eafelie be made within the countrie; that Huntlie, and Aberdein, Seafort, M'Kay, Grant, and the Northland Clanes, which had not fubfcryved, might eafily overfway all the fubfcryvers, with the concurrence of Ham-miltoun, Dowglas, Nidfdale, &c., if fo the King would imploy a little of his force, and lay by Lorne. For the preveening of this, diligence was ufed to fend fome lawers to the uttermofl North, who obteened the hands of all thefe Clanes to the Covenant of the countrie, with the moll of the name of Ham-miltoun, Dowglas, Gordoun, and all the Campbells without exception. No a Burgeffe of St. Andrewes or Dundie refufed; and in Aberdein there will be as few recufants as in Glafgow. This word being fent to Court, made the King miflyke Roffe's advyce. Great hes beene the accufations of our Bifhops againll the Thefaurer, as one who had intelligence in this matter with the countrie; and his recriminations againfl them was great, as thefe who, by their mifcarriages and imprudencies, had mifcooked all the matter. The courfe they refolved upon, after many toe's and froe's, was to fend downe the Marques of Hamiltoun, with a commiffion to treat with Mortoun, Haddingtoun, Thefaurer, Privie Seale as affeffours. The offers they are to make are fecreit: We heare they are fuch as will give no kynde of contentment ; albeit the Bifhops are confident they are fo reasonable, as will give content to many, and fo be able to make a divi-fion among the fubfcryvers, which to them is a win field. For to preveene this, the Noblemen and Commiffioners drew up thefe things which they wer minded to crave, and without the which they could not be content, which they fent athort the countrie, and to Court alfo, for the Marques' fight: for when the Noblemen had returned anfwer to our letters, the Duke to Montrofe, the Marques to Rothes, Mortoun to Lindefay, that the King was to give an anfwer to their defires by proclamation, and thought1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 71 not meet to anfwer or look upon the fupplication, which they fent back clofed as they gott it; our Noblemen hearing that this proclamation was to come downe with the Marques, they wrote up to him earneftly, not to accept any commiffion wherein he had no full power to give the countrie fome reafonable contentment. However it be, the commiffion is put on him : his letters are come to all his friends to meet him at Hadingtoun, the fifth of June. The Thefaurer and Lome are returned, and have holden a counfell at Dalkeith; hes written for all the Counfellors, none of the Bifhops are forgott, to meet at Dalkeith, the fext of June in Counfell, with the Marques of Hammiltoun, the King's Commiffioner. The Commiffioners here at Edinburgh hes advertised all the countrie to be in Edinburgh fome dayes before. What will be the event of this great day, God knowes! We can not heare that the Marques of Hammiltoun is to offer farder than the recalling of the Books, and limitation of the High Commiffion ; and that upon the condition, or rather command, that we furrender all our fubfcryved Covenants, and ly under the old danger of Perth Articles and the Bifhops' unlimited tyrannie. If this be not accepted, as there is no appearance it will ever be, we are threatned with a bloodie onfett by the Navie on the Eaft Coaft, by an Irilh Armie on the Weft, by all the power three MarquefTes in Scotland and the Popifh partie can make, with the help of the North of England. We have indyted a generall Faft the third of June. In God is our great confidence : we fee yet nothing but appearance of mifchiefe. Our people many of them are not humbled, nor in the ftate of penitents ; our Bifhops and their followers are yet in a furie, and have adoe with a people like themfelves. You write not to me what your people in Holland thinks of our matters. We heare that your Confervatour has written to the King, that fome munition is coming to us from Campheir; be affured, if it be true, he could not do us an office we would take in worfe part. Some are muttering that you are in your church-fervice pra<5tifing fome part of our books. I think you are not mad at thyr tymes needlefly to fyde with the unhappie and unjuft partie; what the matter is, write to mee in your next. If you mint to any fuch thing, expe6t a fhort depofition; and if the Burrowes be overthrowen, that they cannot remove you, be affiired to be removed out of their hearts for ever. We know yet no other but that our religion, liberties, lives, are in extreme danger: the Lord help us.72 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. Lome hes beene very plaine with the King: and now, when he is returned, is alfe farre our way as ever, God be thanked. The Marques is thought to be changed the King's way; all maks for the ruine of this Ifle, and I fee yet no meane to re-meed it. Canterburie will remitt nought of his benfall ; he will breake ere he bow an inche: he is borne, it feemes, for his own and our definition; yet there is a God. When our Noblemen were on the point of departure from Court, the Bifhop of Rofle prefented fome ftieets of paper, penned by Brechin, againll the Thefaurer; thir flayed their journey fome dayes. Galloway fyded heere with the Thefaurer; but Brechin, with a marvellous ingratitude, became a traitour to him, revealing all his fecrets he had gathered in his companie: much fowle fly ting was among them. The mater is rather delayed than fully componed; however, fome are come home, and the reft expe6ted daylie. Newes from England the 15th of July [1638.] Four Commiflioners, Lord Arundell, Lord Newport, Sir Harie Vaine, Secretarie Cooke, are deputed to prepare by fea and land. Pennintoun is to be fent over to the north with the lhips. Many flatt-bottomed boats are to be made. Ane hun-dereth fmiths are conveened for iron work, and carpenters to make carriages for eighty field pieces ; twenty-five thoufand fwords to be prepared ; many picks and mufquets to be put in cafes and fent to the north ; fadlers appointed to make numbers of great fadles. Lord Antrum hes hyred a Scotifh ftiip, loadned and furnilhed with powder and munition of warre for Ireland, Weems, the canon-maker, hes conditione to hyre a ftiipp, and to loaden her with light cannons and powder for Dumbarton. Lord Arundell is to come to fortifie Berwick, Carlile, and fome other places. Sir Harie Bruce hes offered his fervice to the King long agoe. He aiked Sir John Seaton if he would ferve the King: He anfwered, he would, bot not againft his own countrey, where he had his life. Both Kirkcudbright and Loch-ryan are aimed at, befide fome other places upon the Weft fea, for landing of flatt-bottomed boats from Ireland : alfo there are flatt-bottomed boats prepared for landing either in Fyfe or Louthian fyde, or both. Letters are dire6ted to every fhyre to have the trained bands in readinefs the 4th of July. The Com-1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 73 miffioners are to relate to the Counfell what number of trained bands, and what number of preparation for warre of all kinde, are appointed, and how foone they can be ready. Lord William Howard hes written to the Lord Arundell, befeeking him to take to heart the buffinefs of Scotland; for if they take arms, the north of England will joyn with them, and therefore it were, bell to ufe a peaceable courfe. \ - To Mr. William Spang, July 22, [1638.] : Reverend and Well-Beloved Coosin, The longer and more frequent my letters are to yow, it feems ye refolve that yours to me fhall be the Ihorter and more rare; yet the contentment which oftymes before I have felt, and does hereafter certainly expe6t of the length and frequency of your writings, forces me to continue my courfe of fhowing to yow how all goes with us, fo oft as I can have occafion of bearers, and fo fully as I can get information by the writes which comes to my hand, and the reports of the moft intelligent I doe meet with. After that our gracious Sovereign had taken at length information of thefe he fent for to his Court, and of the Bifhops who come up unfent for, it is thought that for fome days he was perplexed, toffed here and there with diverfitie of resolutions. The bloodie counfell of St. Andrewes and Roffe, upon aiTure-ance of ane fufficient party in the countrey, was paft from, not only by our Noblemen's contrare aflureance of the vanity of that expectation, evidenced by the catalogue of the fubfcry vers, efpe-cially of the Northland men, of whom the chief hopes were made; bot thefe bloody conclulions were left alfo, by the advyfe of the Englifh counfellers, who freely are faid to have fpoken of the injuftice of fuch a courfe, and the danger which it was like to bring to the ftate of England, as things went, their deep mal-contentments lying for many years, bot overplaiftered, without any folide cure. The plainnelTe of Lome is much talked of; nothing he is faid to have diflembled of all he knew of our countrie's greevances, of his own full miflyke of the Books, of the Articles of Perth, of the Bifhops' mifgovernment, of his re-folution to leave the kingdom rather then to confent to the preffing of any other, let be of himfelf or his fervants, with thefe burdens, which were againft confidence. He put in the Mar-74 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. ques' hands a double of the late Englifli proclamation, decyding the famous controverfie of the Epifcopal jurifdi6tion in their own names alone, and not in the King's. When this came to the King, it is thought he was moved with it, as not haying marked before its incroaching upon his prerogative, and did chyde with Canterburie for it before the Marques ; a quarrell which evidently made the Archbifhop look down on Lorne, who did publickly avow, in the write, contempt of his malice. Thefe counfells of force being laid by for the tyme, with the increafe of deteft of the authors, our Bilhops, little lelTe in England then at home; a conclufion paffes of ane amicable treatie for the countrey's contentment. Long it was ere a perfon could be found of parts requilite for fuch a fervice. Morton, Roxburgh, let be Haddington or Stirling, were not of fufficient Ihoulders. The Thefaurer was once lyke to have been employed ; bot the Bilhops, to preveene the employment of their mortal enemie, did of frefli, when no fuch matter was expelled, give in fome fheets of vehement accufations againft him, of all things they could corrafe,(7) penned by Brechin,(8) bot fub-fcryved by St. Andrewes and Roffe alfo: they did not requyre Galloway's hand to this challenge, knowing his intereft in the accufed. The poynts were thought for the moll part bot light: the King would not take tyme to difcuffe them; fo they were caft by as contemned, or laid up as ane band above the accufed's head, to be applyed in tyme to his fydes. However, the Bilhops' poynt was wone: the Thefaurer miffed the commillion. He made no formal recrimination to his partie ; albeit, it is faid, he fpake either to the King or prime courteours, of horrible crymes, which he could make good, efpecially of St. Andrewes; and indeed their carriage, at this fame tyme, even in England, lies not been ecclefiaftick. Much is fpoken of their wyne and feaft-ing, of their abfence from all divine fervice on the Sunday. When the Thefaurer was decourted, the eyes of all was on the Marqueis (9) for the commifiion. The Iharpnefs of the man ; his late obligation to the King for his very being, by the gift of our taxation; his Father's throughing of Perth Articles, which now was become a maine part of our queftions ; the want of any other made him the only man ; for the Duke [of Lennox] is thought to have no fuch ftuffe as a Commiflioner for fuch bufinefs required; befyde that diverfe does now fpeak of his (') Corrase, to scrape together. (8) Dr. Walter Whitfoord, Bishop of Brechin. (9) James Marquis afterwards Duke of Hamilton.1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 75 inclination to poperie. The Marqueffe, to the uttermoft of his power, declyned this charge, as a fervice wherein his feare was greater to lofle allutterly at leaft implacably to offend thefe whom leift he would ; either his bountifull and gracious mailer, or his mother-countrie, wherein, after the King, his hopes was juftly greateft, then any expectation to bring this intricat bufinefs to the wiftied end. Yet there was no remeid; yield he mull to his Mailer's peremptor command, who laid upon his back the commiffion, with a ftrange Memento, that he was informed, (as indeed our Clergy, Prelident, and Regifter lets him be ignorant of no whifper which they know among us,) of his countreymen's purpofe to fett the Crowne of Scotland upon his head ; yet fuch was his trufl in his loyaltie, that he would imploy no other to reprefent his perfone, at this fo dangerous a tyme, wherein, If I be the foole, yow mull be the knave. My Lord Commiffioner his Grace, would not llirr from the King, till he faw all our countreymen, which the Court any way might fpare, fent home before him, to doe for the King's fervice all the good offices they were able, at leaft to doe him no evill offices with his prince, by their milinformations in his abfence. The Thefaurer, Lome, and Galloway, were the firft who came home together in coatch as good friends. This made the people to begin to fpeak better of Galloway : bot it feemes his fear of the people's furie does ftill remaine; for he comes not in publick, fave in the Thefaurer's company : in his family does he live, and that privately enough; he keeps his old wife plain-neffe, for he rownes not that he avowed to the King his neceffity to leave Scotland for feare of his life, for the want of the word, which he could not hear delivered anywhere without fentences of rebellion, and facraments which he could not participate there without profanation. So foone as thir came doune, a Counfell was called at Dalkeith, a commiffion was formed for the Marques by the Advocate, the double ye have at (A.), letters were directed throughout all the kingdome to all the counsellors, none of the Bilhops excepted, ftraitly chargeing all to be prefent at the next Counfell-day in Dalkeith the lixth of June. Regifter and the Prefident followed the Thefaurer. We hear nought of their dinne at this tyme about Court: it feems both their credit is much impaired there. The Prefident (x) brought with him a prote6lion of a new ftraine, to hinder any execution of law againft himfelf or his cautioners, their perfons, lands, (') Sir Robert Spottiswood, President of the Court of Session.76 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. goods ; his debts are found farre above his goods. It is thought his father the Chancellor (2) hes brought with him the like targe. It is faid, that himfelf and his children will be in fixteen or feventeen fcore of thoufands merks in burden : the world wonders by what means. His eftate of Bilhoprick, Priorie, Chan-cerie, will be better than fourty thoufand pound a-year. His traine and houfe has been ever naughtie exceedinglie. It is faid the Deane (3) has the like fhield. The parfon of Leith has one, I know, and the parfon of Liberton another, for diverfe thoufand pounds of more debt then they have ever appearance to defray, if they finde not a purfe; for now bifhopricks and abbacies are defperat. It is very fcandalous that clergymen ftiould be avowed dyvors, and troublers of the countrey befide. He of Leith (4) is a malicious railer againft the Covenanters, in pulpit and every where. He of Liberton (5) does us a very ihreue turne; polled lately to Court, informed the King, after he had clofed our bufli-nefs and difmiffed our Statefmen, of continuall outrages of our people againft minifters, for their love to his fervice; amongft the reft, the towne of Edinburgh's onfett on D. Ogfton for his life in the church; the people of Torphichen upon Mr. G. Hanna: this did adde oyl to the King's flame. The trueth is, that Ogfton, minifter at Collingtone, made his people, who would obey him, anfwer his examination before the communion on their knees, as the priefts doe in their Ihryving; this, and other things, (for he was brought from the North (6) to that place by Bilhop Forbes,) made him infamous ; fo, in his addition to the exercife in Edinburgh, fpeaking fomewhat, I fuppofe, of the Virgin Mary, he was conceaved of the people, but Wrongoufly, to fpeake error ; whereupon, after fermon, at the out-coming of the church, a number of women waits on, and did Ihoare him with ftroakes ; but Mr. A. Ramfay, and Mr. H. RoUocke, did get him fafe to the feffion houfe, and thereafter convoyed him to his horfe. Mr. Hanna has ever been in hott watter with his people fince his entrie; fo the Sonday after his people had fubfcryved againft his command, they fett on him in the church, ryves his gowne, gives him dry cuffes, and fo without farther harme difmifies him. (2) The Archbishop of St. Andrews, and Lord High Chancellor. (3) Dr. James Hanna, Dean of St. Giles, and one of the Ministers of Edinburgh. (4) Dr. William Wishart, Minister of Leith. (5) Mr. Andrew Learmonth, Minister of Libberton. (6) Mr. William Ogston was Professor of Moral Philosophy in Marischal College, Aberdeen.1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 77 This is much regrated by us all, and the minifters in Edinburgh inveighs much againft thir finfull uproares; and fince there has been no more of them. With the Prefident come word of my L. Alexander's (7) death. I have into it a loffe of a near coofin and familiar friend : The King did profeffe his loffe of a fervant of great hopes. Ye know, befide the gallantnes of his perfone, he was both wife, learned, and verie well fpoken; the Countrey makes not much doole for him, for they took him for ane advancer of the epifco-pall caufes to his power. It feares me his death will undo that ryfeing Houfe: their debts are great; his Father is old, and ex-treamly hated of all the countrey for his alledged briberie, urge-ing of the Pfalmes, and the Books for them, overwhelming us with his Black money. His Sonne is bot ane infant (8); his brother Sir Anthonie, and Robert alfo are dead ; Henrie will not be able yet for his place; and if he fhould, what he can gaine muft be for himfelf, and not the Houfe. Many who intended his Father's overthrow, were withholden for refpe6l to him. In a three or four days feaver, befide all mens expectation, he expired. I think, indeed, that God is juft: among a number of his excellent parts, I knew him to have been very licentious in his pleafures before his marriage. There waited on our Bifhops at Court, one D. Carffe, (9) whom I know not, and Mr. Levifton, who both are bitter againft us ; alfo Mr. Laudian, the Marqueis' chaplane, who hes written fomewhat againft our courfes, at leaft, for kneeling, againft Rutherford. They fay he is dead alfo; I much regrate it: he was an excellent philofophe, found and orthodoxe, oppofite to Canterburie's way, albeit too conforme : I counfelled oft Glaf-gow to have him for their Divinitie Lecturer. (7) William Lord Alexander, Viscount of Canada, was the eldest son of Sir William Alexander, first Earl of Stirling. He died at London in March 1638. (8) The infant son here alluded to> died in May 1640, about three months after succeeding to the title, by the death of his grandfather, the first Earl of Stirling. The title then devolved on Henry. His brother, Robert's name, is omitted in the genealogical accounts of that family. (9) In a letter, in the Editor's possession, written by this Dr. Carse, to Maxwell, Bishop of Ross, dated London, Jan. 10th Q1636], he signs himself " your Lordship's most faithfull servant and cosen, John Carse." He speaks of his " Curate at Brixton;" and in reference to some expected preferment, through Maxwell's influence, he professes his willingness to lay himself " in all duty and service at the feet of our Holy Mother, the Church of Scotland; to be disposed by her as sche schall think fitt."78 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. The multitude of our Scottifti Lords, which were fent doun, Morton, Lithgow, Kellie, Marr, Kinnoull, Haddingtoun, Bel-haven, Amont, and many moe, made us thinke, that the King minded to call fhortlie a Parliament, wherein he might make ufe of their voices; for elfe we faw not to what purpofe their prefence here could ferve. It was given out, that our Bifhops were very loath to come from Court, hot they were forced to goe ; that after their difmiffion, they fought leave to goe to the Bath, to paffe tyme fo till they faw the Commiffioner's fucceffe: yet it was not fo ; for at once St. Andrewes came. Roffe alfo and Brechin came to Berwick ; but to come any farder, for all their boldnefs, they durft not yet venture. It is faid they are there very merry, as our people alfo. St. Andrewes, Edinburgh, Dumblane, makes countenance oft to be in the Dean's houfe. On Sonday, the third of June, his Grace was in Berwick : that day was a folemne Fall over all our Kingdome, where tymous advertifement could be given. Some of our non-fub-fcryvers refufed to joyne. In Edinburgh^1) Mr. Alexander, D. Elliot, Mr. Mitchell, etc. being required to joyne, took them to be advyfed with their Bifhop. At the firft he was content; bot, thereafter, having written over to Dalkeith to Galloway, who newly was come home, repented, and on the Sonday morning fent a difcharge to the minifters to intimate; which they obeyed: bot Mr. H. and Mr. A. (2) did intimate it in their churches, and I alfo in the Colledge-hall, where that day I did preach. For this long while bygone, fome of the Nobilitie, Shyres, and Borrows, waits on in Edinburgh, every man his fourteen dayes. Some of the Minifters alfo keeps their turne, and preaches to their Commiffioners in the Colledge-hall. On Mononday, the Minifters of Edinburgh would have been at the intimating of the Faft in their week fermons, notwithftanding of the Bilhop's difcharge; bot the Commiffioners, mainely on Mr. Andrew's motion, (for I was witnes to it, and did much reafon againft it,) did fend fome of the Toun Counfell to Mr. Alexander, to difcharge him, and the reft to joyn in the Faft, except they would joyne in the maine caufes, to pray for a bleffing to (L) The Ministers of Edinburgh at this time, besides the Dean, (see p. 76,) and the three who are here mentioned, viz.—Alexander Thomson, Dr. James Elliot, and David Mitchell, were David Fletcher, Andrew Ramsay, and Henry Rollock. (2) Mr. H. stands here for Mr. Henry Rollock, and Mr. A. for Mr. Andrew Ramsay, two of the ministers of Edinburgh, whose names are of frequent occurrence in this work.1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 79 the Covenant. So, on the Wedenfday, Mr. Alexander, with many teares, in the midft of his fermon, Ihew his willingnefs to joyne in the Faft, if he had not been difcharged : his teares pur-chafed him little pitie. It is marvellous how much more that our good friend is hated of his people then Mitchell himfelf, or any other there. I was forry for D. Eliot's grief. I had yielded to Mr. Henrie to preach in his church on the fading Son-day, with the Doctor's good lykeing ; they had agreed to put me in the forenoon, Mr. Henrie in the morning, the Doctor afternoon ; for in the failing churches they had three fermons. Yet before Sonday the Doctor is difcharged to preach in that church at all, unlefs he would fubfcryve, left he Ihould marr the devotion of his hearers by his evill example : there was no re-meid; Mr. Samuel Rutherfoord was put in his place ; the congregation was great exceedingly ; many of our Nobles were there ; and indeed that peoples humiliation was greater then I hoped for, God be thanked! Mr. Henrie is a man much more mortified than I thought ever to have feen him, and preaches very patheticklie. Mr. Rutherfoord hes an excellent gift both of preaching and prayer, and, which helps all to the peoples minde, felles all the fourteen Btfhops and hoghes the Ceremonies ; yet in this he goes little beyond Mr. Henrie. As for Bifhops and Ceremonies, I melled not with them; bot of the Service book, I fpak fome more then my hearers had been acquainted with from any other : by this I did pleafe them. On the Monday great reafoning there was for meeting of the Commiffioner. His Grace had written almoft to the whole nobility, and gentry of note, to meet him on the Tuefday about Haddingtoune. Many would gladly have done him that honour; bot for the Reafons that ye have at (B.), favouring much of Rothes pen, it was decreed, that none of the fubfcryvers, no not of his deareft friends and vaffals fhould goe; only my Lords Loudon and Lindefay, and fome two three Barrons, Ihould go out, and carrie the excufe in name of all. With this dealing his Grace feemed nothing well pleafed, and was like to have returned poft to Court in malcontentment; bot Rothes, haveing communed fome two three houres with him in Dalkeith, did appeafe and remove his miftakings. Some days before, ane accident fell forth which well near had occafioned great mifintelligence among all. It had been refolved at Court, upon the Bifhops complaint that the King's houfes were unfurnifhed, when the Noblemen had provided fo large80 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1637- munition for all theirs, that the Thefaurer lhould furnifh the Caftle of Edinburgh with powder and lead, and other neceffars, whereof it flood in great need. The Thefaurer gives this charge to Patrick Wood; who layes in, either out of the Tower of London, or by his moneys, privately into a fhip of Leith, threefcore and odds great barrells of powder, fome hundreds of picks, fome kills full of mufquets and matches. When thir came to the roade, the Thefaurer being advertifed, come into the towne. After fupper, according to his dire6lions, his man Daek and Patrick Wood, that night, caufes in hafte, and all the privacy they could ufe, carry all that munition to Dalkeith. To-morrow the whole towne and countrey is full of no other difcourfe. Patrick Wood is much detefted by all for his readinefs in fuch employment; he is called to the Commiffioners' table ofter then once, and ftri6lly examined: his anfwers at firft were fomewhat proud; bot at once his courage cooled, when his bands began to be polled to the regifters, many in one day; much he did quickly pay; the Covenant without delay he did fubfcryve; many good friends did for him what they could ; yet all had enough adoe to keep him from the hands of the people, and hold off, for a tyme, his numerous creditors. On the Thefaurer lighted more indignation, that he lhould have fecretly caufed convoy, in the night, to the place of meeting, fuch provifion, for what end elfe bot to blow us all up ? He came in, and to Rothes, Lome, and Loudon, purged himfelf of fuch wickednefs; confeffed the ne-ceffity laid upon him to provide for the Caftle of Edinburgh, bot being forewarned by fome noblemen and gentlemen, fub-fcryvers, of their refolution to feafe on that provifion if it were caryed towards the Caftle, he thought it meeter quietly to carry it to Dalkeith, the neareft of the King's houfes, then to tempt them to fall in a ryot, which might make matters defparate of reconciliation. However, it was thought the Marques took not this fervice well of the Thefaurer ; for albeit to Lindefay, who was fent to Berwick, to try, among other things, what was his part in this munition, he confeffed he knew of the ladening of it; and oft fince in his difcourfe he hes ftriven to facilitat his treatie, by threatening us with the readinefs of the King's navie to fett upon us, with ten thoufand land fouldiers well trained. Three dayes after, we forced him to give over comuning; and it is known, that in his way through Northumberland, he gave direction to the Iheriffs to have their trained bands in readinefs; which,: for that end, twyce a week fince have been muftered:1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 81 Alfo he fpake of the readinefs of a Spanifh armie in Weft-Flanders to be employed where the King would diredt. For all this, the conveying of that munition privately to the place appointed for his amicable treaty, it is faid, he took it from the Thefaurer for a diffavour, as done of purpofe to hinder the fuccefs of his Commiflion in his hands. Many thinks, that the Thefaurer and Roxburgh both are not contented, that in this imployment them-felves were neglected; and therefore are not very carefull to further this fervice. Yet for all that is faid in this, I believe the Thefaurer is honeft; and whatever he might be moved to doe for the King's pleafure againft us, yet will I not thinke, that he would be fo madd as in any thing to difoblidge the Marqueis, to whom this twelve moneth he has ftuck fo clofe, and whom, if he fhould irritat at this tyme, when fo many are in his topps, his mine feemed to be inevitable. Alwayes this action of the Thefaurer, as many other fince the beginning of this weightie affair, done by him, whether of purpofe for that end or not, hes much furthered our caufe, hes made all the countrie flock in a trace to the towne, putt all in a greater eagernefs then ever. The inequity to meet with the Marqueis at Dalkeith fo provided, laid a necefiity on the Marqueis to come and treat in the towne, or elfe in the fields ; for this provifion was ane juft reafon of our diftrult; and which was moll, not only a watch of fome hundreth armed citizens was put nightly in the towne, for it was expe6led, that Huntley, Harries, Abercorne, and Winton, were to be in with all the power they could make; bot alfo the gentry began, in armes both night and day, avowedly to watch the Caftle, that none of that provilion might be caryed from Dalkeith thereto, as the Thefaurer faid it would, and much more, which was coming in moe Ihips. This Caftle-watch was much fpoken of, as the firft of our illegal a6tions. Bot it was replyed, That fince ane innocent defence by armes to the body of a State, in the evident danger of their Religion, Liberties, and Lawes, was granted to be lawfull by the law of God, nature, nations, and chiefly by the laws and frequent pra6tifes of our nation, approven by diverfe ftanding A&s of Parliaments ; this being granted, as few among us now makes queftion, (fome indeed does, whereof I am as yet one,) it cannot be denyed bot all things fimplie neceflary for that innocent defence are alike legall; of the whilk, the keeping of that Caftle in the prefent cafe, and praeveening the putting of it in fuch a ftate, wherein it may ealily, in twelve houres, deftroy that good F82 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. towne, the head of our nation, the only convenient place of our meeting, the maine finew of our union and defence; our providence about this place, upon this ground, is thought jufli-fiable to all equitable men. If our defigne had been to have made any invafion, nothing more eafie, than by three dayes hunger, or fix houres afiault, to have taken that Caftle and all the others alfo the King has among us; bot our folks are far from fuch acts of hoftilitie, if they be not forced to them. The Commifiioner would not grant to come to the Abbay, unlefs he were folemnly met, and that watch were removed. Of the firft we made no queftion; to the other, after much debate, we agreed, on condition, that Haddington, Southelk, Lorne, the in-tercomuners, fhould ingadge their honour, fo far as was pollible, that in the mean tyme there fhould no munition at all, neither any vidtuales more than for daily ufe, be put in that houfe. This was yielded to by them : fo the watch was difcharged. Bot the Commifiioner would not ftand to that communing, and took it for a diftruft of his honeftie, when any more was craved than his bare word : fo the fame night the watch was fett to againe, and that in a double number. Yet when, at the town of Edinburgh's renewed fuit, the Commifiioner was contented to come in, notwithftanding of that watch, Lorne took it upon him to difcharge it fimply without any condition, and in this was obeyed, for the Commiflioners' contentment: only a privie watch was ordained, and yet is keeped; yea, all wifhes there had been no other from the beginning, for it is thought fufficient for their end. The Counfell at Dalkeith mett frequently. Huntley was there, bot with a fmall traine; he fpake nought as we hear againfl our caufe: he carried himfelf like a Proteftant. We fent Mr. Andrew Ramfay, Mr. James Boner, Mr. Thomas Aber-nethie, and a fourth, athort the Counsellors, to follift them for their favour, in thefe words ye have at (C.), penned by Mr. David Dick. All gave good anfwers, and Huntley ftiew, that he had found our caufe fince he come South, more equitable then in the North he was informed of it: for the Books, he fhould be glad to be inftru6ted by any they would fend to him, what evill could be found in them. The man is of a good difcourfe, bot neither trufled by king nor countrey ; his power alfo is contemptible in this caufe : many of his name hes fubfcrived ; himfelf and fundry of them are over burdened with debt. Forbefes, Frafers, Grants, M'Kenzies, M'Cayes, Macintofhes, M'Laines,1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 83 M'Donalds, Irwines, Innices, let be all the Campbells to a man, are zealous fubfcryvers; and a fifth part of them were able to make a diljune of all the Gordouns when at their bed ; albeit now the moll of the Gordouns depends on Sutherland, as all in the South on Kenmure. That day in counfell St. Andrewes fat with the feales, as fome faid, with the Marques commiffion, as others, hung about his neck in a pooke, as the fafhion is for the keeper of England in the King's prefence. Our noblemen fubfcryvers will not fo much as fpeak to him, and fcarce look on him; and that according to a conclufion paft at their Table, that in the dependance of this caufe againil the Biihops our only partie, no fubfcryver fliould any wayes countenance any of them. This, I fear, be bot a preface to their procefie of excommunication, or inditement upon their head of high treafon : diverfe thinks the King will not be much againil this, if fo that in the ruine of thir mens per-fons, he could find a meane to preferve his own honour, and their Epifcopall eft ate. Nothing at all was done in the Counfell : the Commifiioner was not pleafed to this day to acquaint any there with his Majelties minde ; only his folks lets out, that he was confident to leave the countrey in peace, and give them, ere he went, full fatiffa6lion ; bot it feems, that the manie mifiives polled daily to him from Court lince that tyme, hes reftringed his liberty to doe what then he intended. In his entrie at Leith, I think as much honour was done to him as ever to a King in our countrey. Huge multitudes as ever was gathered on that field, fett themfelves in his way. Nobles, gentry of all Ihyres, women a world, the town of Edinburgh, all at the Water-gate ; bot we were molt confpicuous in our black cloakes, above fyve hundred on a bray-fide in the links, our alone for his fight. We had appointed Mr. William Livingftone, the ftrongeft in voyce and aufterefl in countenance of us all, to make him a fhort welcome ; bot a good friend of yours and myne was ralhly officious to informe D. Balquanquall,(3) (who is come down to wait on his Grace as almoft a chaplaine, upon hopes, if all goe well, quickly to obtaine ane Archbilhopricke, he is for nocht laigher,) that in the harangue were inve6lives againil the Biihops ; which was nothing fo, for ye may read the fpeech at (D.): Upon this information, the Commifiioner excufed himfelf to our Nobles, and, in palling, to Mr. William himfelf, faid that (3) Dr. Walter Balcanquhal, Dean of Durham. For the f good friend' his informer, Vide supra, note page 1.84 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. harangues in field were for princes, and above his place ; yet what he had to fay he fhould hear it gladly in private. So our fpokefman, with other two or three of our number, went and delivered to the Commifiioner in his chamber what here ye read without any farder; for we discharged him to enter in any other purpofe, all being refolute to give anfwers to what fhould be proponed in a public way, after advyfement with all the brethren. Our friend, for his rafhness to informe, I did much chyde. The Marques, in the way, was much moved with pitie, even to tears ; he profefied thereafter his defyres to have King Charles prefent at that fight of the whole countrey, fo earneftly and humbly crying for the fafety of their liberties and religion. His Grace's countenance and carriage was fo courteous, and his private fpeeches fo faire, that we were in good hopes for fome days to obtaine all our defyres : yet at laft, when we heard, that all the power he had was to caufe read at the Crofie a proclamation of the King's pleafure, without any farder commiflion, our hopes became well near defperate. What was in the proclamation we could not learn ; only there was much fpeaking of a command to furrender, and give in our fubfcryved Covenants, upon promife to ratifie by Parliament, all or the moft part of the matters contained therein. This was a motion infinitely difpleafing to all; and to put the Commifiioner from all hope of obtaining any fuch proportion, Reafons were given out, I think, by Mr. Alexander Henderfone, which ye have here in print, why upon no termes, it was poflible for us to pafie from any poynt, lefie or more, which we had fworne and fubfcribed. This refolution was firmly keeped by all. Mr. W. Cochran, (4) a fharpe and bufie man, was like to have incurred great difgrace, and public cenfure, at the gentries table, for holding privie conferrence with the The-faurer, and letting fome overtures fall that favoured of altering, upon good conditions, fome claufes of the Covenant. This our Itricknefs flopped the proponing of a furrender, or altering of any thing in the write ; only the Commifiioner fhew, that he was minded to proclaime the King's pleafure. Our commiflioners, fome two three of the Nobles, Barrons, Burrows, and Minifters, fhew their refolution to proteft if it were not fatiffa&ory. This the Commifiioner, and all he could make, laboured to diflwade with might and maine, with many promifes, with great threats ; (4) Probably Mr. William Cochran of Cowdon, who was afterwards knighted, and raised to the Peerage, first as Lord Cochran, and then as Earl of Dun-donald.1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 85 bot in vaine, for we were peremptor ; being informed, without a proteftation, and that prefently upon the back of the proclamation, our pofterior meetings would be illegal and fubje6l to cen-fure : the Reafons that were given out for the neceflity of proteft-ing, ye have here at (F.) All thefe would not put the Commis-fioner from it; he ftiew in this he would fee the King obeyed ; he would come up to the Crofs, and back the lion-herauld; if they would proteft, he would denunce them all rebels. The Thefaurer comes up the way on the Thurfday before noon, calls for the lion-heraulds, makes foupe the Crofs for the hangings. All our people conveens, fome thoufand gentlemen with their fwords loofe in their armes, about-the Crofs ; a fcaffold is made for Caffills, Durie younger, Mr. William Livingftone, and John Smith, to proteft for the Four Eftates. When this dangerous refolution was perceaved, the lion-heraulds were advertifed to provide horfe, which made us conceave they intended to read the proclamation in other burghs. This made many make their horfes ready to have convoyed the Heraulds where ever they went, and courfe was taken for to have protefters provided in every burgh where the proclamation was like to be fent. This our firme conftancy made the Commifiioner pafs from motioning any more his proclamation. It feemed to many, that his inftru6lions were of fo many parts, that he had warrand to preffe every piece to the outmoft, and then to paffe from it, if no better might be, to the nixt. This feemed to fome of us the beholders, bot little policie; we thought it had been more expedient for our divifion, their maine end as was thought by fome, to have at the verie firft granted frankly all they could be brought to, than to offer fome few things, whilk could content none, and to enter upon fecond offers after the refolute rejection of the firft. This did bind us all the falter, made us the more bold in prefiing our full defyres, upon hopes, that an am-bulatorie and paffing commilfion was not yet paffed on the halfe of its way, let be to be near the laft end. On Fryday we did prefent to his Grace a common Supplication, which ye have at (G.) To make way for a ready anfwer thereto, there was fome nine Propofitiones fpread abroad of purpofe, that they might come to the courteours hands, containing articles to be advyfed, upon fuppofition that delayes, crafts or force, fhould be ufed againft us ; ye may read them at (H.) This half boaft did make the Commiffioner receave our fupplication in the better part. On the Saturnday he pro-86 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. mifed, after his returne from Kineil on the Tuefday, ane anfwer to it. On that Sonday he heard Mr. Alexander Henderfon preach, and thereafter conferred with him at length in private. Of this we all do much marvell, and cannot fee a reafon why he Ihould have given fuch ane occalion to the Bifhops cenfure, whom he knew to be ready enough, upon every fhadow, to calumniate him to the King as ane inclyner to the puritane fide. He was indeed offended with fome of our preachers : Mr. Andrew Cant, ane fuperexcellent preacher, as all report, Mr. Rutherford, Mr. William Livingftone, Mr. Robert Douglafs, Mr. A. Blackhall, and diverfe other, had preffed the extirpation of Epifcopacie. Every day in that week there was a preaching in four or five diverfe roomes, except the Saturnday: what was faid by any, all incontinent was delate to his Grace in no better termes, be affured, then was delivered. Mr. Alexander Henderfon had been fpareing, and Mr. David Dick much more; fo that he Was cenfured of too much prudence, and behoved to help it by his fcourgeing of the Bifhops in pofterior fermons. Upon re quell of fome counfellers who loved our caufe, the Bifhops, by fome, in fermons, were dealt with more foberly then before; bot nothing at all was remitted by others. On Tuefday our Commiffioners went to his Grace for ane anfwer to their Supplication according to promife. The anfwer was, That their demands of ane Affemblie and Parliament fhould be granted ; bot firft fome fcruples anent the write behooved to be fatiffied. Thir were to be proponed by the three former intercomuners ; with thefe were appointed to treat for us other three, Rothes, Montrofe, Loudon : they agreed their conference fhould be by write. The fcruple proponed was this; His Majeftie may conceive, that the Confefiion is fo generall in the claufe of mutual defence, that it may not only containe a defence for religion and his Majefties perfon and authority, liberties and lawes of this kingdome, bot alfo a combination for defending of delinquents againft authority and law, even in other claufes than thefe forfaid. Our communers took it to their advyfement with their companie, if therefore it were ne-ceffare to draw up a humble remonftrance, to explaine our dutifull intention concerning the claufe above written. The Tables both of nobles and gentry fand, after long difputt, that fuch remonftrances were dangerous ; likely nought bot delayes and fnares were fought for. Yet it was granted, that in a renewed fupplication, that claufe lhould be fufficiently cleared, if1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 87 fo that they were not needleffly incombered with more interrogatories. The fupplication is drawn up by the Nobles, bot miflyked by the Gentry and Miniftrie; for what caufe I know not, for yet I have not feen that peece. The Commiffioner alfo would have them agree to a declaration of this claufe of his forming; bot this all did refufe: yet at laft all did agree upon a Supplication, in thir terms, which ye have at (J.) Againft this the Commiffioner did not fay much; only ftiew, that what he had in his Inftru6lions concerning ane Affembly and Parliament would not content them; neither would all yet they had faid content the King: for all that, he would not leave the matter defperate; he would poll to his mafter, and fee if by himfelf he might give better informations than he could by his miffive letters; he trailed ftiortly to returne with fatiffa6lory inftruo tions. This neceffare overture we could not refufe; bot we in-treated his Grace for the earned agenting with the King, thir Six articles which ye have here at (K.) The day of his returne he hes named for the longeft the fifth of Augull. What we fpeake of the Service-book was occafioned by the Bifhops continued madnefs. However, all does think that the King's proclamation fliall free us for ever of that unhappy book altogether : yet they are fo negle6tful of their gracious mailer's honour, that by their words and deeds they make the world fuf-pe6t that the King hes no intention to keep his word: Un-happie fervants to fo good a mafter! Galloway's man allured Mr. James Blair, that the book might well be corre6led in our affembly, bot it behooved to goe through. The Bifhop of Edinburgh avowed to Mr. James Lang, that in the book there was no evill; that it was much better then that of England ; that for all our prefent uproares, that book would goe through, whoever would fay the contrare. The Bilhop of Dumblane came to the Commiffioner, Ihowing that he was to read fervice in the chappell, and required his Grace's countenance to it. The Commiffioner bade him " Doe fo," bot to be prefent at it, it was no part of his commiffion. Thereafter, when Dumblane was affured of the evident danger he might incurre by fuch ane attempt, he returned and Ihew the Commiffioner, he behooved, for fear of his life, to let alone his reading. His Grace's anfwer was nocht bot as before, " Doe fo." For all this, they go out, St. Andrewes to Roffelin, and in that chappell read the fervice: this conftant report is now queftioned. In this I marvell much of their wifdom. St. Andrewes Hill grows in his rage; he is88 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. going back in hafte to Court to worke us what woe he can : it is like he fhall never returne. Our people thinks, by clear law, if they gett any reafon, to have [him] excommunicat, and readily thereafter execut. It feems he is fo defperate, that he would be content to fall in the peoples hands, for the defyre of martyrdome: Would to God he and his brethren could preferre the fafety of the King and kingdome to their own honour, and fatiffa6tion of their wicked paffions. What we fpeak of the interruption of our trade, is occafioned by that arreiftment of the States of our merchands armes, at the inftance of the King's Agent, (5) and your Confervator(6) alfo, as we hear, upon a moft falfe narrative, that the King has declared us all traitors, and we are in the a6ts of open rebellion. However we were moft unable to revenge fuch injuries, many whereof it is thought we have gotten of late of your good Conservator ; yet he lhould fear, if not God, the avenger of liers and hurters of their countrey, yet the King, to whom he does dangerous wrong through our fides. Who ever fteires the flame betwixt the King and his fubje6ls, at this time, feemes to be moft mortall enemies that the King ever had, either to his per-fon, or crowne, or pofteritie; and that arreiftment will not be a fmall coal to that fire. Ye have oft Ihowed to me of that man's facultie of lying and wicked humors many wayes; if ye, after the knowledge of it, take yow to his fide, your miferie, when he procures it, will not be fo much regreted. Befyde other things I wrote to yow before, whereof I have receaved no anfwer, I heard of your letters, I think within this twelve moneth, to St. Andrewes, concerning the fpeeches and prayers of your churches there for us, as their perfecute brethren. What are ye doing ? Your letters were fent to the King by the hand of the Prefident. Though I heard this obiter, yet few, I think, among us doe know it, and God forbid they lhould. I pray yow come over, if ye defyre to keep your old eftimation ; but come over refolute to fubfcryve, as now all among us in-clynes to doe. At our townfmen's defyre, Mr. Andrew Cant, and Mr. Samuel Rutherford, were fent by the nobles to preach in the High Kirk, and receave the oaths of that people to the Covenant; my Lord Eglintone was appointed to be a witnefs. (5) Sir William Boswell, King's Resident at the States in Holland. (6) Patrick Drummond, Conservator of the Scots Privileges, at Campvere. He was knighted previous to October 1640., at which time he was suspended or deposed from his office by the Committee of the Estates of Parliament.1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 89 There, with many a figh and teare by all that people, the oath was made ; Proveft, Baillies, Counfell, and all except three men, Patrick, James, and Mr. Archibald, held up their hands ; Mr. Zacharie [Boyd,] and Mr. John Bell younger, hes put to their hands; the Colledge is thought will fubfcryve; Mr. William Wilkie I know will; the Forfuithes [Forfyths] hes fubfcryved, and almoft all who refufed before ; fome they will not have their hands, bot mindes to proceffe them. Mr. Crichton, (7) my coulin, is ordained to be fummoned for his corrupt do6trine and pra6tifes, before their prefbytrie; and two affociates out of the foure next adjacent preflby tries. I think I could move [him] to make a publick recantation for bygones, and give all poffible affureances for tyme to come ; bot it fears me all this keep him not in his place. Mr. James Forfuith hes been fo idle in his written protections read out of his pulpit againll our Covenant, the antichriftianifme, jefuitifme of it, and what not; alfo in fome paffages againft our Noblemen in his fermons, and fome other mifcarriages, that it feares me his cenfure fhall be deep; fo much the more as he is not liklie to carry himfelf with any cannynefs in tyme comeing. Mr. William Anan,(y) pre-fently after his fubfcription, went to Edinburgh, where he hes remained fince' above a quarter of a year: he is in great con-fufion and perplexity. With his own confent, Mr. Robert Blair was admitted his fecond : all his company is with the Deane and Btfhops. The brethren fent out to him commiffioners oft to join with them in their meeting, bot ftill he would not: the towne of Aire dealt much with him; bot in vaine: fo they at laft gave in a complaint of his mifcarriages, with a refolution never more to receave him within their pulpit. I think there is no ten Minifters in the kingdome fo much oblieged to their people's gratuitie, as he alone was, and ftill would have been, if he might have been pleafed to have done any tolerable duty. The prefbytrie is ordained, with the affefiion of fome neighbours, to cite him, and to goe on with him in proceffe for faults to be lybelled: it is lyke he hes no minde to returne. The Bifhop of Dune(9) hes written over to him, and Mr. David (7) John Crichton, minister of Paisley, to whom Baillie addressed a series of Letters, which are alluded to at pages 10, 24, &c. These, extending to 82 closely written pages, form part of the Second Volume of the MS. into which Baillie's Letters were " doubled" or transcribed. (8) William Annand, Minister of Ayr. Vide supra, p. 62. (9) Dr. Henry Lesley, Bishop of Down and Connor, in Ireland. He was a native of Scotland.90 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. Mitchell, that they would come and live with him: likely Mr. David Mitchell will fhortly be proceffed for his do6lrine. There is a great work of reformation intended among us, and evidently begun ; there is much amendment of common faults; we hope it will fpread to our neighbours of England and Ireland: the opprefiion there of the Bilhops on mens foules, bodies, and goods, is fo pitifull, that it is marvellous if God come not doun to plead the caufe of the poor innocents. The late uproares of the Innes of Court, we hear, lhall be bot the proseme to the infequent tragedie, if Canterburie will be pleafed to remitt nocht of his accuftomed ftiffnefs. It is like, that our vi6tualling of Dunkirk draw France and Holland on our Prince, and the Spaniard on us ; all this, it fears me, marre ftill the Palatine's defignes. Alace! for the pitifull ilaughter of our countrymen at Antwerpe: this muft be your Prince great want of providence, who advanced fuch a handfull fo farr in the enemies bounds, without either fpies before them, or a back armie or fort for retreat: a unhappinefs in a Generall is to be pitied ; bot fuch a negle6t of condu6t is intollerable, and curfed. Alwayes unhappie we, who in fuch interprifes are commonly fure of the ftrokes. Ye have here alfo fome Reafons againlt the Service in print. Our preffe at Edinburgh is now patent: we hope not to trouble yow fo much there as we were wont. I took the author to be Mr. Henderfon ; bot I am informed fince, that they came from Mr. George Gillefpie, a youth who waited on my Lord Kennedy, and is now admitted to the kirk of Weems, maugre St. Andrewes baird, by the prefbytrie. This fame youth is now given out alfo, by thefe that fhould know, for the author of the Englifh Popifli Ceremonies :(*) whereof we all doe marvell; for though he had gotten the papers, and help of the chief of that fyde, yet the very compofition would feem to be farre above fuch ane age : bot if that book be truely of his making, I admire the man, though I miflyke much of his matter; yea, I think, he may prove amongft the bell witts of this Ifle. While we are expe6ling the Marqueis way-going, behold new ftories, whereof we did not dreame. His Grace, on Saturday, comes up to the Croffe, makes for a proclamation. Diverfe of (') This anonymous work, by George Gillespie, afterwards one of the Ministers of Edinburgh, is entitled " A Dispute against the English Popish Ceremonies obtruded upon the Church of Scotland/' &c. 1037, 4to. This edition appears to have been printed in Holland.1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 91 the nobles, many of the gentry were away home, being fecure of all till the Commiffioner's returne from Court; yet numbers flocked to the Crofie put themfelves in readinefs to proteft; bot they fuperceided, finding the Proclamation, befyde the expectation of all men, to be nocht bot a reftitution of the Counfell and Seffion to Edinburgh dureing the King's pleafure. This great benefite not being looked for, not being fought nor thought upon by any at that tyme, was receaved bot with fmall acknowledgement ; fo much the more as the maine narrative ranne upon the incommodities which the Lords did fuffer by their fitting in all other places, as if this favor had been intended only for their accommodating. Tomorrow, on Sonday, his Grace went to Seaton; where, in Tranent, he heard Mr. Robert Balcanquall; with whom we were nocht pleafed ; for however he has fubfcryved, yet in that fermon, as in all the reft of his carriage thir divers years, he was more cold and wife, than zealous and Itout to fpeake one word for the good caufe. We thought that the Commiffioner had been thus far on his way; yet to-morrow, as if he had receaved new Inftru6lions from the poft, he returnes ; and on Wednef-day, betwixt twelve and one, caufes proclaime, as ye have it at (L.) This proclamation was heard by a world of people, with great indignation : we all doe marvell that ever the Commiffioner could think to give fatiffaction to any living foul by fuch a declaration ; which yet oft he profeffed with confidence of that piece before it was heard: there mull be here fome mifterie which yet is not open. This declaration cannot be that which his Grace brought with him, that was thought certainly to con-taine a command of furrendering our Confefiion : bot of our Confeflion is no fyllable; yea this hes been by appearance drawn up here very lately by the Bifhops and Statefmen who are trufted, with the confent, as it feems, of the Commiffioner; for the date of it is bot fix or feven dayes, at Greenwich, before it was proclaimed in Edinburgh. There was on a fcaffold anent the Crofie, simul et seme\ read by Mr. Archibald Johnftone, a proteftation, which ye have at (M.), avowed by Caflils, young Durie, Provoft of Dundie, and Mr. John Kerr of Pannes, in name of the nobles, barrons, burgefies, and minifters. Some out of fhotts cryed rebels on the readers ; the people in a fury would have been up to fearch: it was feared Mr. Robert Ran-kine, or Mr. John Browne, or the Deane, might have been rent in pieces ; for they were thereabout in the Dean's chamber; l92 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. bot the diligence of the Noblemen hindred the fearch, fo there was no hurt done to any. The Nobles, at dinner, are informed, that the Commiffioner was about to gett the Counfell to approve the declaration as fatiffa6lory ; whereupon they prefently fell a writeing thefe Reafons which ye have at (N.) ; and after dinner went to his Grace, Rothes, Montrofe, Loudon, with doubles of thefe Reafons for Haying the Counsellors from making any ap-probatorie act. There paid between them fome high words : Loudon told his Grace roundlie, they knew no other bands betwixt a king and his fubje6ls, bot of religion and lawes; if thefe were broken, men's lives were not dear to them; boafted they would not be, fuch feares were paft with them. Notwithstanding, the Commiffioner prevailed fo farr with the Counsellors, that they all, except Lome and Southelk, did, in their chamber, not publickly at their Counfell table, fett their hand to this a6l, which ye may read with admiration at (O.) When it was heard, there was conceaved fo high offence by us all, at thefe men, whom we were affured were ready to fubfcryve with us the Covenant, that our grief was unutterable : Yett all came about for the good of our caufe; the unreafonablenefs of their grievous injurie being remonltrate to them, they fell prefently to repent; and for our fatiffa6lion, did not reft till they had gotten back that fubfcryved act, and rent it in fmall pieces. We hope that our fweet Prince, and all neighbour nations, will judge the declaration, not fo much approven by our Counfell, in their privat, and too much haftened fubfcriptiones, if not ltolen from them by vehement foliftation, as difavowed, yea detefted as unreafonable by their open, avowed, and deliberate renting in pieces of their approbation thereto. For mitigating a little of our minds, there was offered to us a more favourable proclamation; as ye have the act of it at (P.) ; bot it was holden in, becaufe we were ready to proteft againft it as not fatiffa6lory. This manner of dealing lies made us fpeak out that which was before bot in the mindes of fome very few, our right from God, which the Prince may not in law or reafon take from us, to keep a Generall Affemblie. The Reafons of this conclufion ye have at (Q.), in print, done by the advyfe of three or foure of the beft witts. This is the higheft firing yet our neceffities hes drawn us to ftrike on. At my firft hearing of it, I was much amazed : I was allutterly averfe from thinking of any fuch proportion ; bot after fome iludy, I find my mood allayed. I1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 93 intreat yow try the minde of Rivett and Voetius, if when the Prince or State are unwilling, the Kirk may keep a Generall Aflembly in times of neceffity, though authority fhould discharge ; alfo dire6l me to all the wryters ye are able for my help of information. I am feared that this boaft of our right, only in policie, as yet they fay, be indeed put in pradtife : the events I groan to imagine. Lome Ihew the Commiflioner, he was informed from Court, of Antrum's undertaking to come over upon his lands. He knew not any of his own merits to procure fuch adls of hof-tilitie, bot if fuch oppreflion were offered, he would fee to his defences. We hear of fome fix or nine of the King's fhips coming to our North feas : fome fays they are goeing only for the protedlion of your Bufhes, for the tenth barrell of their fifhing, lately granted by your States to the King. They fpeak alfo of Arundell's coming down to Berwick. All thir things putts us in flocht. The Commiflioner went away on the Mun-day early, after he had given fome good words to our Nobles. He intended to dyne with the King on Fryday. He took the 12th of Augull for his return. In the meantyme we have, on the 22d and 29th of July, a univerfall faft. It is lyke, at the Counfell-table in England, our affair may gett fome fatall ftroke one of thefe dayes. Mr. David Dick and Mr. Alexander Hen-derfone are convoyed by my Lord Montrofe, and others, north, to draw in, if they can, thefe who yet lyes out in the fheriffdome and towne of Aberdeen. If God blefs that labour, all our countrey, now to count of, is as one man in this bulinefs, which goes on like Elias' cloud, from a hand-breadth to fill the whole fkyes. When we look to our defervings, and the dealing of God round about, and the pregnant appearances in human affaires, we are afraid our whole Ifle be terribly fhaken, if not made defolate, before this ftorme calm: Our truft is in God. There appears not yet from men any likelyhood of peace, or any pofiibility of it, as matters goes on both fides. The Bifhops may be at once excommunicat, and all their wilfull followers: if for them our nobles blood be fhed, the Ifle will hardly keep any of them. Dumblane is to Court. Brechin and Rofle, if they be yet in Berwick, we know not. St. Andrewes is yett among us. The Nobles gave in to the Commiflioner, ere he departed, ane accusation of brybery and other crymes againfl the Prefident and Regifter. He defyred them fuperceid their perfuit till his re-94 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. turne: fo thefe two fitts yet ftill in the Seffion. If they gett reafon, it is thought they are both undone ; and none among us will pitie their ruine. My Lord Commiffioner hes fo caryed himfelf from his coming to his going, that he hes made us all fufpend our judgment of his inclination, whether it be towards us or our oppofits : yet the warrieft and moil obfcure breafts will be opened by tyme. We have had all this year hitherto moll feafonable weather, great appearance of increafe on the ground, for the relief? of our heavily diftreffed land by the by-gons fcarcity. We are not yet troubled, whereof we marvell, with any of our adverfaries wreittings, either from England or at home ; readily we will be overwhelmed with a fpeit of them at once. Some little things of D. Barron, Forbes, and Panter, are ftark nought, and very unworthie the authors. What ye wrote ye faw of mine, it is apparently a fheitt which off hand was given to the extemporarie objections made at the beginning againft the Covenant ; if it be poore, no marvell. Bot J have written two larger pieces, apologizeing for our proceedings, which I have offered to the tryell of our oppofits ; yet without a reply: thir, when I can get doubled, ye fhall have, fuch as they are. We are grieved for the ftoning of D. Monroe, when he came from Edinburgh, where he had much company with the Bilhops, and was thought to be a fpye to them of the a6tions and proceedings of the Noblemen. The women at Kinghorne, at diverfe parts of the towne, in great multitudes, were fett for him. Some gentlemen in company defended to their power, and gott him on a great horfe, whereby he efcaped death, bot not wounds and blood. Thir unhappie and ungodly violences hurts our good caufe : they are lamented by us ; bot there will be no remead for them, except the law be patent for our grievances. Jufl and very heavy grievances muft either vent the way which God, law, and reafon hes appointed for their eafe; or by violence they will make a way for themfelves, which nature, reafon, law, let be God, does not approve. Wryte ye to me fo rarely, fo fhortly, as ye pleafe; ye fee I ftryve to move yow to change that courfe. The Lord be with you, and your fpoufe, and all ye love there. If we knew not of a reft in heaven, where there is no fray, our life on earth would whyles be comfortlefs. Your Coofin. July 22. Receave at (R.) the laft Supplication given to the Marques;1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 95 ye fie it is pickeand ; it obtained the poynt of rescinding of that A61 of Counfell: and ane Information from England, which lies put us all newly agaft if it be true. Strange ! that Canterburie fhould be fo furiouilie unjuft. I hope God hes raifed him to mak our Ifle once quyt of Bilhops, for all. St. Andrewes is to Court. Mr. Chrichton's eftate fee at (T). This day twelve moneth, the ferving-maids in Edinburgh began to draw down the Bifhops pride, when it was at the higheft. [......(2)-] Reverend and well-beloved Brother, The papers ye wrote for, my Queries and Paralell, I had neither my felf; bot I fent to Mr. John Bell of Stevenfton for a loan of that double himfelf made: he hes fent yow both. Ye mull not faill to fend them back to him. I was fully purpofed to have been with yow to-morrow, and to have taken yow with me to Lowdon; bot I was advertifed yefternight from my brother of his wife Chriftian's ficknefs, and of her defyre to fee me ; fo of neceflity I muft to Glafgow to-morrow ; the week following I mull preach on Wednefday, and celebrate the Communion on Sonday, God willing, fo that I will not gett yow then feen ; and thereafter is the meeting of Edinburgh. It is fore againft my heart, that I winn not both to conferre with my Lord Lowdon and yow, bot fince fo necefiare occafiions diverts me, I muft take the hinderance from God's providence. I am fo full of doubts about our Generall Aflemblie, if the King difcharge it, or which is equivalent, yield not to it, when it is fo earneftly fought, that my heart hinders me to be a Member of it. This I am forry for, for many reafones ; and wilhes that I might be refolved cheerfully to goe on in this with my brethren, as I have done in all other things; bot the more I aflay, my minde is the more averfe. My Lord Lowdon is the man from whom I expe6ted fatiffadlion ; and for this end had fundry purpofes to goe to his Lordlhip, both in Edinburgh and here. My maine doubts are, That I finde no example of a Na-tionall Aftembly meeting againft the will of the Supreme ma- (2) There is no name affixed to this letter ; but it was probably addressed either to Mr. W. Castellaw, Minister of Stewarton, or Mr. Michael Wallace of Kilmarnock.96 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. giftrate rightly profeffing, neither in antiquity, n<5r in any of the Reformed churches to this day. 2dly, By all appearance, our meeting in a Generall Affembly of our owne will, will make our hopes of peace defperate for ever, whill that Affembly be annulled. 3The caufes alleadged for the neceffity of it, coniidering our late Covenant fo mighty a barre againft error, and the discipline of Prelbytries doing with evill minifters or pro-feffors what we will, are not fo pregnant, bot they may admitt of a delay. 4thly. The reafon from the law, or nature, from fcripture, or antiquitie, infers bot a permiffion, bot not a command, under the pain of fin to meet. Some other doubts I have ; bot my chief is, my heart fails me to think on it. In our firft printed Reafon, a Parliament feems to be avowed no lefs neceffare; which, to think upon without a King, feems to me a horrible fountain of all mifchiefs. I trull thir my thoughts ye will keep them very clofe : I communicat them to yow, that ye, as if they were your own, may gett fatis-fa6lion about them. I pray yow, frae I cannot come to yow, doe me the good (I fpeak not now of compliments) pleafure or favour to come to me, and it were bot for an hour or two, if ye may not flay ane night, before Tuefday the 25th of this moneth, the day appointed for choofeing our commiffioners ; for I will then be in a ftrait. I know I will be chofen for one, and, as I am now fett, of neceffity I muft refufe, which will be exceedingly evill taken; however, I pray yow, after your conferrence with Loudon, let me fee yow this Thurfday or Fryday, or the nixt week. The Lord help us. [For Mr. W. Spang.] coosin, By your laft, the 7th of July, I was made glad that all my former, without intercepting, had come to your hand. Your largenefs alfo in anfwers gave me full fatiffa6lion. Ye fhall not need hereafter to write any word of apologie to me. I did never believe any of thefe calumnies ; yet I thought good ye lhould be acquaint what fome malicious or miflaken people did report. I hear that ye and the Confervator both, in the late Convention of Burrowes, by your letters, gave good contentment. Mr. William Struthers wife, and we all, thanks yow for your kinde offer to print that paper I fent yow ; bot fhe is not fo defyrous to have it to the prefle as before; fo ye fhall fuper-1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 97 feid till advertifement. As for our great affair, have here all what I know into it lince my laft. Our Brethren who went to Aberdeen wes bot coldly welcomed in that town. Fryday, the firft night they came, their Do6tors fent to them a number of enfnareing Demands, hoping by dlfputts and janglings to make their journey fruitlefs. Thir Demands much ftudied, yea, put in print, and fcattered athort as farr as the Court of England, were anfuered by our brethren againft to-morrow, and at night given to the Do6tors. For all this, the Do6lors refufed to lend us any of their pulpits ; yea, the voyd church was made faft, and the keys keeped by the Magiftrate. Howfoever, in my Lord Marfchell's clofe, there were three fermons heard by a hudge confluence of people. Mr. David Dickfon in the morning at eight hours began; and after fermon anfuered fhortly, and popularly, to all the Doctors demands. At twelve hours Mr. Alexander Henderfone did preach, and Mr. Cant at four, to no leffe a multitude then at the firft dyet: they wyfely did choyfe the tymes when there was no publick fervices in the churches. After all, at a table in the clofe, fome four or fyve hundred, at leaft a good number, whereof fundry were of the beft qualitie, did fubfcryve. On Mononday, they went out to the Sheriffdome, where, with much labour, they perfuaded many. My Lord Marqueis of Huntley, and the Clergy of the toune, had preoccupyed the hearts of all that people with great prejudices againlt our caufe; yet, by God's help, of the large half of the diocelTe was obtained to the number of fourty-four Minifters. On the Saturday, at their returne to Aberdeen, the Do6tors had ready in print Replyes to our brether's Anfwers. To thir our brether gave an Anfwer at once, and fo returned home. Since, the Do6lors hes been on a Triply, which yet is not come out. Howfoever our brethren had great difadvantage in tyme, and place, and laike of books, yet God and the caufe hes made, in my judgement, no pregnant infirmitie kyth in their anfwers. We are well content that thefe men, who are the learnedft, without queftion, of our oppolites, hes gotten the occafion to print and reprint what their beft engynes is able to fay againft our proceedings, with anfwers, which we truft fhall in the end prove fatiffa&ory to all, as already they have done to D. Guild and Mr. David Lindfay, moderator of Aberdeen prefbytrie, and diverfe others, who at the firft were much withholden from coming to us by thefe Demands. Our Bilhops were not permitted to come to vol. i. g98 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. Court: St. Andrewes, it is faid, was countermanded in his way ; fo he lay in Morpett a number of dayes in the common poft-mafter's; yet at laft all three, Brechin, Roffe, and he, went to Newcaftle, and there lives as they may in ane common Innes. The Thefaurer fent them fome hundreth dollors, and the Commiffioner, in his way, fome more money, for their entertainment. Roffe polled to Court, gott fome two houres of the King, and without feeing of Canterburie, in haile was fent back. Diverfe of our clergy hes vifited them. D. Panter hes returned from them ; and lince lurks : D. Wifhart, and Mr. Lermont of Lib-berton, flayed behind him. The reft of St. Andrewes Do6lors, Howie, Bruce, Martine, Baron, hes all fubfcryved: D. Monroe, fince his ftrokes, is among the foremoft in our meetings : the Arch-deane, after reading of the Covenant in his church, by Mr. Gabriell Maxwell, hes not preached: that day Mr. Armor wes well pyked; fo that towne hes now no ordinare minifters, bot are fupplied by the prelbyterie. I thinke D. Panter for do6lrine, and Arch-deane- [Gladftanes] for drunkenneffe, are under pro-celTe. Mr. Creichton did appeall from the Prefbyterie; fo did Mr. James Forfyth : to the one they lay a number of errors, proven by many witnefies ; to the other they lay preaching the con-veniency of bowing at the name of Jefus, fimonie, and a number of leffer matters : The one offers in difcreet termes all contentment for bygones and tyme to come; bot is not trailed: The other is full of will and paffion, and, which I much marvell, is inclined to Canterburie in omnibus, as it feems, which in him is a late and great change. Both are fufpended, and went to the Bifliops: Mr. Creichton is forward to Court, hopeing to be preferred in England or Ireland; I think, however matters goe, there fhall be no more place for him in Scotland. Mr. James was filled with great words by the Commiffioner, whom he mett; and the Bilhops put him in hope that the King ftiortly would be upon us with an army. The Commiffioner came back before his day, D. Bakanquall with him : He keeped himfelf more referved than before; his Mother(3) he would not fee; Crowner Alexander he did dif-countenance; Mr. Eleazer Borthwick he met not with; after four or fyve dayes parleying, no man could gett his minde. The reafon of this carriage, they fay, was his defyre to remove all (3) The Mother of James Marquis of Hamilton was Lady Anne Cunningham, daughter of James Seventh Earl of Glencairn. She was a most decided and zealous friend of the Covenanters at this time.1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 99 jealoufies, which his enemies, from fome paffages of his carriages the laft voyage, had laboured to put in the King's mind: The King was indeed difpleafed with his Mother ; and when his brother, Lord William's patent for the Earldom of Dumbar(4) came in his hand, he tare it, for defpite, as he profelTed, of her. Crowner Alexander openly did give countenance and allowance to our Nobles meetings; Mr. Eleazer was the man by whom his Grace, before his commiflion, did encourage us to proceed with our ^applications: from all thir now his Grace's countenance was fomewhat withdrawn. While we began to fear delayes, behold a Eleven demands are required of us, to be performed before our AlTemblie could be indi6ted: they were very evill taken of us all, as meer fhiftings, and propofitions invented by our Bilhops for the fruftrating of all our defignes ; thir were twice read at all our Tables, and a common Anfwer framed to them, which here ye have at (A.) We expected ane reply to our anfwers ; which, if it had been given, we might have yielded to fundry of thefe things : bot his Grace faid, he was at a nonplus, and behooved to be again at the King before he could proceed. In our anfwer to one of the articles, we were near to a difcord among ourfelves; The Committee appointed for the firft blocking of all our wrytes, had faid, none Ihould meddle with the election of commiflioners from Prefbyteries to the General Aflembly, bot Miniilers and Elders. At the reading of this our brethren Hopped ; alleadging, that this anfwer did import the ordinar fitting of laick Elders, not only in Seflions, bot alfo in Preflbytries, their voteing there in the ele6tion of Minifters to bear commiflion: this they took to be a novation, and of great and dangerous consequences. For myfelf, it was my good luck to have ftudied fomewhat in that queftion; I was fatiffied in my minde, of the lawfulnefs and expediency of our old pra&ife and ftanding law, for Elders fitting and voteing in prefbyterial matters, efpecially in ele6tion of commifli oners to Affemblies : fo I was filent; bot many made dinn; and all required the changeing of the anfwer to more generall words, which might give the power of that ele6tion to thefe who had the cullom or law in tyme bygone for choofeing ; this did not hinder Elders to obtaine all their right or defyre, only it held off the prefent determination of a queftion (4) Lord William Hamilton seems never to have obtained this title, which was then in abeyance; but he afterwards regained the King's favour (vide infra, p. 116,) and was created Earl of Lanark, 31st of March 1639.100 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. very important. This our corre6tion of that claufe made fuch a ilurr at all the Tables, both of nobles, barrons, burgeffes, that they all refolved to quitt us in the caufe, if prefently they obtained not that poynt. Some from them all comes to us : After a little reasoning, there was no remead; we all yielded, though fome fore againft their ftomack : bot of all evills, diviiion to us now is incomparable the worft. The claufe of our Elders therefore behooved to ftand as ye fee it: yet that queftion is like to make us trouble; for fundry of the brether are very jealous of the gen-trie's ufurpation over them. This ftorme being paft, we finding that all or the moft of the Marqueis demands tended to the prselimitation of our Affemblie, and fo did incroach on the freedome thereof, there were Reafons drawn up for to fore-arme us againlt the propolition of any fuch prselimitating; which, if I can gett, ye fliall fee at (B.) For two or three dayes we were in great perplexitie, none knowing what well to doe: the Commiffioner had no more to fay; we were inclined fome to wait on, moe without farder patience prefently to give order for our Affemblie by ourfelves : a Committee is chofen, of all our Tables, to confult privatelie on this matter. This was the only queftion wherewith, from the beginning of this matter, my minde was tormented; and if I were through it, I doe not forefee any other whereupon I would fo much ftick : my minde was fo full of doubts at that tyme, that if I had been pofed, I would have diffented from meeting in an Affemblie without the King's permiffion. Alwayes the matter, for fear of oppofition and divifion, was never mentioned in pub-lick, and fo I faid nocht; for I had refolved before, in my field-coming, to be lilent through all this dyett, fo farr as I was able ; to figh, and pray, and take heed, bot no further. After the Commiffioner fand us on thir confutations, he fent to entreat for a delay of conclufions before yet once he might poft to Court, to reprefent, bot not to deale for the King's acceptation of our Anfwers to his late demands : for to promife ti ■ move the King to be content with them, he would not, himfelf efteeming our anfwers unreafonable. This his propofition was reje6ted of all, and all delay refufed upon fo naked a narrative. Thereafter his Grace came near us, fhewing by Lorne and South-elk, that he found out, upon farther information, that our anfwers was according to our lawes, which before he knew not; bot now having found it, he was hopefull fo to reprefent it to the King, that he might obtain, by ane other voyage, the indiftion of ane1638. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 101 Affemblie as free as we could wifh. This new motion was fo well proponed to us all in a common meeting by Lome, ane excellent fpokefman, and fo well feconded by Rothes, that many inclined to grant to the Commiffioner the delay he craved; yet the body of the Gentrie, of the Burrowes, and the chief of the Minifters was flatt againft it; who, by difcourfe, found worlds of dangers, if this meeting fliould diffolve without taking of prefent order for the Affemblie, and many moe things. My heart was fore grieved to fee the unreasonable ftiffnefs of many, which, for feare of miftake, I durft not mint to reafon againft in publick: yet at laft God made reafon and equitie cary it againft the hearts of fundry of the chief minifters, albeit we had all refolved, for feare of divifion, to have yielded to thefe of our brether who were molt wilfull, if no better might have been; bot the authority of Lorne and Rothes, who were here earneft agents, did cary the matter. When I faw the unexpedled conclufion, I rejoyced in God, and, by this experience of his watchfull Providence over this great caufe, made hopefull he would not fuffer it be fpoiled by the imprudencie of mony uncannie hands which are about it. So foone as the Marqueis had gotten our promife, of leaveing all things as they were till the 20th of September, and taken in hand to agent to his power the obtaining of our Four Articles, lft, The full freedome of our Affemblie in the members and matters, 2dly, The haftening of the tyme, 3dly, The commo-ditie of the place, 4thly, The difcharge of intercepting of our letters in England ; that fame Saturday afternoon he went away towards Court, hoping on Thurfday to fee the King. One of the caufes that made fome of our number to deale the more peremp-torlie with the Commiffioner at this tyme, was his injurious letters to Aberdeen : for, in his way from Court, he wrote not only to them great thanks, and moved the King to doe the fame, for their carriage towards our brethren; bot fpoke of us contumeli-oufly, as ye may fee in the double of thefe letters at (C.) ; yea, not fo only, bot for no words would he be put from printing of a Declaration of the truth in thefe calumnies, as he faid, which we in our Anfwers did put on him. For myfelfe, I marvelled in the tyme, that the Commiffioner fliould have made that demand about our mutuall band in tearmes fo advantagious for us, and fliould have profeffed his fatiffadlion in our anfwers to that maine impediment of our Affemblie : bot haveing done fo, I thought he would never have recalled it, or put it more in queftion ; yet it feems his unfriends hes made fuch informations of that his un-102 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1638. advyfednefs, that in all hazards he muft retreat it: he was made allured, that the whole Tables would teftifie the contrarie of his Declaration, and caufe print their contradi6tion, that he thought it meeter to undergo all hazards, then to fuffer that (whether true or falfe) alleadgeance to lye upon him, without his publick dif-claiming of it. I hope to fend yow with the demands, anfuers, replyes, duplyes, and triplyes of Aberdeen, the Marqueis declaration, and the Minifters anfwers to it, all printed; with our Nobles letters to Aberdeen, in wryte. In the heat of all thir actions, God did much incourage us with Father Abernethie the Jefuite's converfion. On the Thurf-day there after Mr. Andrew Ramfay's fermon made for the pur-pofe, in a large half houres fpace, he made a very fweet dif-courfe(5) of his errors, and reclaiming by the grace of God, with many teares of his own and the molt of his hearers ; thereafter, with great defyre, he fubfcryved our Covenant, and fpake much to the commendation of it. After all our diligence to try, we can finde no apeirance of hypocrifie in the' man. He Ihowes us many things, which I hope to fend yow with Mr. Andrew's fermon in print: among the reft he told, that there is eighteen prielts at leaft ever in Scotland; he gave their names and abode : he tells, that in England there will be above fix thoufand: that at London there will be above three hundred maffes fung every Sabbath ; that he knew, on a fix years fince, when he was laft at Rome, a conclufion pall in the congregation De Propaganda Fide, for to ufe meanes to draw the Church of England to that of Rome, bot to mell no farther with our Scotifh Church than ane affociation with England, upon hopes, by this conformitie alone, to gaine us fullie by tyme. There went out in his name reports of Canterburies intercourfe of letters with the Pope, of the contryving of our Scotilh Liturgie at Rome; bot when I pofed him on thefe, he denyed his knowledge of any fuch matters, albeit he confeffed to me fome ftate-paffages, which might have been prejudicial! enough to him if they had gone abroad. So foon as the Marqueis went away, the Tables advyfed on inftru6tions for the Generall AlTemblie to be execute prefently after the 20th of September, the longeft terme which the Com- (5) This discourse was printed at the same time as Ramsay's Sermon, was all. This did fill the two Houfes and City with fuch joy, that they required permiffion, and obtained it, to exprefle the fenfe of it, by ringing of all their bells, above a thoufand, and fetting out their bone-fyres. Bot as no worldlie joy is unmixed, fo to-morrow there fell fome discontentment betuixt the two Houfes. On the Mononday, the Earle of Strafford had fent his petition to the Higher Houfe for fome longer tyme. My Lord Sey fpake fomewhat for the petition ; bot Eflex againft it. On Tuefday, the Lower Houfe fent up a mes-fage by Mr. Pym, requireing, that no more tyme might be granted. Notwithftanding, on Wednefday, when Strafford appeared, his gutt and gravell, and pertinent fpeech, bot molt of all his lawyers oath, that they had done all diligence to have their anfwers perfyte, and that yet it lay not in their power, for fome days to come, to have them in any readinefs ; all this obtained him eight dayes more tyme. This granted did fo extreamlie grieve the Lower Houfe, that they were near to have broken up, and give over all fitting, at leaft till Strafford were at ane end. When that motion was laid by, they were near to a proteftation againft the Higher Houfe, as hurting the priviledges of their Houfe, by granting to any they had charged with high treafon any delay of proceffe, any benefite of councell,302 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1641. or ufe of lawyers advice, any permifiion to anfwer by wryte : yet they did not proteft; onlie did notifie their grievances with great paflion. The Londoners, who had promifed long agoe fixtie thoufand pound Sterling, and had it [in] readinefs, keeps it ftill in hand. The Jefuite's repryving was the firfl occafion; and yet when the King hes given him over to their will, there is no more word of him, and I think they lhall difmifs him ; and now while they have reafon of Strafford, they will give no money: this is their great weapon; fo both the armies are in their third moneth. The Englilh fojours, we hear, plunders the countrey without reproof. The favour granted to Strafford is laid moll on the back of the good Lord Sey: he did indeed moft fpeak for it; but no doubt thefe who were moft for granting him bygone courtefies, will be his fmalleft friends when he comes to judgement. The Higher Houfe, for fatiffa6tion of the Lower, fent to the Tower to advertife Strafford, that he come on Wednefday fullie inftru6led, for no longer delay will be granted upon any alleadgencie. The week before there was a great commotion in the Lower Houfe, when the petition of London came to be confidered. My Lord Digbie and Vifcount Falkland, with a prepared companie about them, laboured, by premeditat fpeeches, and hott difputts, to have that petition call out of the Houfe without a hearing, as craving the rooting out of Epifcopacie againft fo manie eftab-lifhed lawes. The other partie was not prepared ; yet they con-tefted on together, from eight a'cloack till fix at night. All that night our partie folifted as hard as they could. To-morrow, fome thoufands of the citizens, bot in a verie peaceable way, went down to Weftminfter Hall to countenance their petition. It was voyced, Whether the petition fhould be committed, or Not ? by thirty-fix or feven voyces, our partie carried it, that it fhould be referred to the Committee of Religion; to which were fome four or fix more added, young Sir Harrie Vaine, Mr. Fynes, and fome more, our firm friends. This Committee was appointed to confider all the remonftrance, all that was in the London petition, or in any other petition from the countrie, and of all to make their report, without determinating of any thing ; alfo they were difcharged to medle as yet with the queftion of removeing the office. Before this Committee, everie other day, fome eight or ten of the Remonftrants appears. Do6tor Burgefle commonlie is their mouth; we did fufpe6t him as too much Epifcopal], and wifhed he had not been of the1641. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 303 number; bot he hes fuch a hand among the miniftrie, and others, that it was not thought meet to decairt him; yea, he hes caryed himfelf fo bravelie, that we doe repent of our fufpicions. The paffages of the remonftrance that yet hes been called for, he hes cleared to the full contentment of all the Committee, except Mr. Selden, the avowed pro6lor for the Bifhops. How this matter will goe, the Lord knowes : all [are] for the ere6ling of a kind of Pref-bytries, and for bringing doun the Bifhops in all things, fpirituall and temporall, fo low as can be with any fubfiftance; bot their utter abolition, which is the onlie aime of the mofl godlie, is the knott of the queftion ; wee muft have it cutted by the axe of prayer : God, we trull, will doe it. The treatife I fent yow, of the Unlawfullnefs of Limited Epifcopacie, is anfwered. They have fett me on a reply, which I have now ended: readilie yow may fee it in print at once with a new edition of the Canterburians, much augmented. Think not we live any of us here to be idle ; Mr. Hen-derfone hes readie now a fhort treatife, much called for, of our Church difcipline ; Mr. Gillefpie hes the grounds of Prefbyteriall government well afferted ; Mr. Blair, a pertinent anfwer to Hall's remonflrance: all thefe are readie for the preffe. Dr. Twiffe, to jrtir great comfort, is here turned a Remonftrant. The convocation-men meet everie Wednesday, and reads their Latine Lettanie, and fo departs till the next week ; they have yet gotten no com-miffion from the King to medle with any thing. Their motion to petition the Parliament, that fifteen of them might be heard to debate matters with fifteen of the Remonftrant minifters is evanifh--ed ; as alfo the petition for upholding of the Bifhops is flrucken in the lift; albeit ane folid and pertinent anfwer to it be Mr. Barroues [Burroughs] and his colleagues, with Mr. Henderfone's preface, is walking up and doun the earth, which here I fend to yow. Dr. TwifTe, if there be any difputt, offers to be one; he-is doubtlels the mofl able difputter in England. We are, in this point, betwixt great hope and great fear; bot faith helps the one, and diminifhes the other. Yow had need there to aflift us much by your earneft prayers, and the prayers of all the godlie in your flock. The matter will fhortlie come to fome conclufion : all parties longs to be at ane end. If Strafford were once away, Can-terburie will make no flay. Then things will runn ; bot if all can be done before the fifteenth of March, it is hard to fay. The King hes fpoken at length with all our Commiflioners apart, verie fweetlie and pleafantlie. Johnftoun and Loudoun ufed great304 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1641. freedome, and was weell underftood. Rothes, and Loudoun, and Henderfone, feems to have great favour: the Marquefs rules all the rod, and is much commended be all. The laft day, feven of the Englifh Lords, all Commonwealth's men, were fworne Privie Counsellors; Effex, Hertfoord, Bedfoord, Briftoll, Sey, Mandaveell, SaviH. The Peers required we might fend for any of our nation we thought meet to be at the conclufion of the treatie, bot efpecial-lie Argyle : In this, I think, we fhall doe their defyre. Some of the Lower Houfe hes been inftant with our Commiffioners to fignifie the truth concerning our fugitive minifters and regents, a roll of whom they fent to us ; to whom they preffed us to add fo manie more as we knew in the kingdome. Our advyce was, that none ftiould be troubled who would, under their hand, give fome toller-able fatiffa6tion to the next Generall Affemblies. It is like there ihall be no more reft for thefe men in England and Ireland than in Scotland. Ane ordinance the other day paft both the Houfes, for diffolving prefentlie the Irifh armie ; for two more fubfidies, befyde the former four for difarming the Papifts. The Queen's voyadge to France, and the marriage with Holland, yet holds. The combination of the Papifts with Strafford's Irifh armie, to have landed, not in Scotland, but Wales, where the Earle Worcefter, a prime head of the Popilh fa6lion, had commiffion to receave them : thefe things are more and more fpoken of. Duke de Vanden [Vendofme], the Queen's bafe brother, for fear of the Cardinally is here at Court. Ro. Baillie. London, February 28th [1641.] [To the Same.] Reverend and Dear Brethren, Thefe twentie dayes and above my minde did not ferve me to write any thing to yow, not fo much for the multitude of affaires, whereof, believe me, I have had no fcant ever fince I came here, as that I expe6ted everie other week to fee our maine bufinefs come to fome clofe, that fo a man might have pronounced what was likelie to have been the end of all thefe commotions ; bot be-caufe that week does not yet appear, left you be too long waiting for my letters, I doe now force myfelf to wryte how things1641. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 305 goes for the prefent. The Marqueis [of Hamilton] being through-lie reconciled to the Englifh, who not long agoe were little better affedled towards him than to the Lieutenant and Canterburie, found it meet to bring fome of the chief of them upon the Counfell. The firft motion of it was bitterlie rejected by the King; yet the Marqueis, by his wifdome, brought him unto it: fo, as I wryt before, feven of the mod leading of the Lords, who were malcontent for the mifgovernment of the Bifhops, were fworne Counsellors : Briftoll, Effex, Bedfoord, Hertfoord, Mandaveele, Savill, and Sev. This, for two or three dayes, did pleafe all the world ; and to whom was England fo much oblidged as to the Marqueis, who had brought thefe men fo near the King whom the countrey did moft affect ? bot incontinent fra fome of thefe new Counsellors were found to plead publicklie for fome delay to Strafford's pro-cefle, and to look upon the Scottifh affaires not altogether fo plea-fantlie as they wont, all began to turn their note, that it was rafh imprudence fo foon to put thefe men in poffeflion of the honours which fome of them wer thought alone to feek. Our Commif-fioners were deeplie cenfured for advyfeing the Marqueis to promote thefe men untymouflie, (albeit I heard Lowdoun deeplie fwear he never knew of any fuch motion till it was ended :) They were fclandered as if they alfo had been to be admitted Counfel-lors of England and bedchamber-men, I mean Rothes and Lowdoun : a foolifh phanfie which was never thought of, let be fpoken. The Scotts were everie where faid, for all their former zeal, to be fo farr broken by the King, that they were willing to paffe from the perfuit of Canterburie, an^ the Lieutenant, and Epifcopacie in England. Some of our countrie, according to their naturall facul-tie, were thought to be the inventors and chief fpreaders of thefe dangerous lies. The matter went on fo farre, that the Londoners, after the money was colle6ted, refufed to give one pennie of it for our armie. Affaires thus ftanding, our Commiffioners prefentlie, with fome peice of paflion, caufed Mr. Alexander penn that little quick paper, proclaiming, againft malice, the conftancie of our zeall againft Epifcopacie, and the two Incendiaries. This we gave in to the Peers, requireing them with diligence to communicat it to the Parliament. A copie of it fell in the ftationer Mr. Butter's hand, who put it to the preffe, and fo through the city. The citizens were infinitlie weell pleafed with it; their fainting courage returned. Bot Briftoll, the Speaker for the Engliih Peers of the treatie, was much difpleafed with our quarrelling of Epifcopacie in vol. i. u306 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1641. England, and prefled us much to pafle from this motion. When we perfifted, he gave our paper to the King. To-morrow the King was enraged at it: hot after, by reafon, he was a little calmed; the paper in print being put in hand, not by Briftoll, as the word went, bot by Holland, our good friend, mynding, as we know all, no evill to us. The King was fo inflamed as he was never before in his tyme for any other bufinefs ; for the keeping up of Epifcopacie in England, which we ftrove to have down, is the verie apple of his eye. This furie for fome dayes did in nothing relent; the printer was committed ; the paper was called ane hundred tymes feditious. The King told us we had in juftice forfaulted our privi-ledges ; our old friends, the new counfellers, fpake nothing for us ; our old enemies of the Popifh and Epifcopall fa6tion fett out their faces ; manie of whom, we never doubted, did joyne with them to maligne us : diverfe of our true friends did think us too ralh, and though they loved not the Bifliops, yet, for the honor of their nation, they would keep them up rather than that we ftrangers fhould pull them down. That fa6tion grew in a moment fo ftrong, that in the verie Lower Houfe we were made aflured by the molt intelligent of our fafteft friends, they would be the greater partie. This put us all in fome peice of perplexitie : our armie could not fubfift without moneys ; fuch a light accident had put all our enemies on their tiptoes, made fundrie of our feeming friends turn their countenance, and too manie of our true friends faint for fear. All this came juftlie upon us. What yow dow there, I know not; bot we here were fallen half afleep in a deep fecuritie, dreaming of nothing bot a prefent obtaining of all our defyres without diffi-cultie. The Commiflioners had fent for Argyle to be at the end of the treatie. The Marqueis had written for Lindefay. Amont had gotten a warrand to come up ; bot at once, by poft upon pofl, we defyred all to ftay till a new advertifement. By this blaft God wakened us ; we fled to our wonted refuge, to draw near to God; the godlie in the city, in diverfe private focieties, ran to falling and praying: by thefe our old and belt weapons, we are beginning to prevaill, praife be to his holie name ! By earneft en-treatie, the King was moved to hold in his proclamation, wherein he faid, he would call in our printed paper as feditious. We gave in a mollifieing explanation of our meaning ; which with the printed paper, I fent home in my laft letter to my Ladie Montgomerie. Here we were put in a new pickle : the Englifh Peers were minded to have caufe printed our explanation ; this doubtlefs this ralh and1641. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 307 ignorant people would have taken for a recantation of what we had printed before; fo the laft evills had been worfe than the firft. Bot in the end of that explanation, we had profeffed, that we had yet more to fay to the Parliament, according to our in-ftru6tions, againft Epifcopacie : fo before we had faid all out, the King thought meet neither to publifh his proclamation nor our explanation. Evill will had we to fay out all our minde about Epifcopacie, till the Englifh were readie to joyne with us in that greateft of queftions; bot there was no remead; the King urged that paper. Good Mr. Alexander being fomewhat grieved with the event of the former wryte, fett himfelf with the more diligence to the accurat frameing of the nixt; and, after fome dayes delay, gave out that moft dilligat expreflion of our defyres of unitie in the ecclefiaftick government in all the King's dominions, which here I fend yow. Briftoll was not weell pleafed with it, and the King worfe : yet the former furie was paft ; neither was there here any provocation ; for our defyre is proponed in great modeftie of fpeech, albeit with a mightie ftrength of unanfwerable reafones. All that they replyed, after fome nights advyfement, yow may read in their fhort paper, defireing us to defift, and not to move the Parliament in that matter. The reafons why we cannot acquiefce to their defire bot moft have the Parliament's anfwer, are to be prefented in the Treatie to-morrow; fo our paper, we hope, fhall goe to the Houfes one of thir dayes, who then will be in a prettie readinefs for it. As for the Englilh affaires, thus they ftand. Yow heard [in] my former the great debate in the Lower Houfe about the Minifters remonftrance, and Cities petition. My Lord Digbie, the Vifcount of Falkland, Sir Benjamin Ridiers [Rudyerd], as yow may read in their fpeeches here inclofed, one in print two in wryte, did de-claime moft acutelie, as we could have wilhed, againft the corruptions of Bifhops ; bot their conclufion was, the keeping in of a limited Epifcopacie. Learned Selden, and a great fa6tion in the Houfe, ran all their way; yet God carried it againft them, that not onlie the Remonftrance, bot alfo the Cities petition, which required the rooting out of all Epifcopacie, fhould be committed. The Committee mett thryfe a-week in the afternoon; fome fixteen of the Remonftrant minifters attended them. They required fatif-fa6tion pun6tuallie in that head which concerned the government: it feems the complaints againft the do6trine, the worfhip, and other things, were fo clear, that they needed no farder probation. The308 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1641. Minifters, by their Speaker, Dr. Burgefse, gave to the Committee full contentment, and fo much the greater by my Lord Digbie and Mr. Selden's frequent oppolition; the citizens alfo made good all the parts of their Petition, which the Committee required to be proven. All this, after long tyme, being done, Mr. Crew, who was in the chair of that Committee, made a favourable report to the Houfe, That they had found the Bifhops fole ordination and jurifdi&ion, their intermedling with fecular affairs, their too great rents, and manie other things concerning them, to be true grievances. Here it was where the better fyde beftirred themfelves, and God ftranglie did aflift them : to propone the rooting out of the Bifhops had been by pluralitie of voyces to have eftablifhed them : they therefore refolved to proceed ordine refolutivo, to take doun the roof firft to come to the walls, and, if God would help, not to ftay till they raifed the foundation : However to goe on fo farr as was poffible ; leaving, without any legall confirmation, what now they cannot winne to till a better tyme. On Tuefday the 9th, as I remember, they gave them their firft wound : after a long debaite, at laft unanimouflie, not ten contradicting, the Lower Houfe decreed to move the Higher Houfe, by bill to take from them voyce in parliament. The nixt day they did the fame for the Starr-Chamber, High Commiflion, Counfell, and all other fecular courts. One of thefe dayes they are to call doun their cathedrall-deanries, and prebendries ; alfo to fpoyll them of their ufurped ordination and jurifdi6lion, to ere6t prefby tries in all the land, and diftribute, in ane equall proportion, the rents among all the paroches for preaching minifters. Thefe things being concluded below, as it is expe6ted they fhall be unanimouflie, let Selden and fome few others gnafh their teeth as they will, all will be caft in one bill, and be given in to the Higher Houfe, where it is hoped it will gett a good hearing. When Epifcopacie is made a poor plucked craw, whether our paper, and the Citie's, and many other, will at this tyme gett the neck of it clean thrawn off, only God does know. We are fomewhat hopefull, and would be more, if more earneft prayers were made to God for that effe6l. The Bifhops, to fave the life of their office, hes invented a trick which we truft fhall irritat the Lower Houfe the more againft them : they have moved the Higher Houfe to appoint a committee for religion, to confider both of innovations, and what of the old is meet to be reformed, confifting of eight or ten Earles, as many Lords, and as many Bifhops, with power to the Bifhop of Lincolne, who fhall fitt1641. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 309 in the chyre of that committee, to fummond, againft Friday, fome of thefe who are reputed the moft able and orthodox divines of the land, to witt, The Primate of Armaugh, Prideaux, Ward, Brommerik [Brownrigg ?] Holfwoorth, Featly, Haket, and Weft-field ; and of the Remonftrants, Twiffe, Burgeffe, Young our learned countreyman, Whyte, Marlhall, [and] Hill, to be prefent and give their advice. It is expe6ted that this will be a fpurr to the Commons, not by their accuftomed flownefs to fuffer their committees to be prevented, and fo fruftrate, by this new devifed one. Bot that which is the great remora to all matters is the head of Strafford: as for poor Canterburie he is fo contemptible that all cafts him by out of their thoughts, as a pendicle at the Lieutenant's eare. The charge which the Houfe of Commons gave in to the Houfe of Peers againft both, yow have here in print. So great dealing in this long delay of tyme hes been ufed for Strafford, that himfelf and his friends became infolentlie confident of his efcapeing at leaft with life : yet their courage is fomewhat cooled, beholding, on Saturday laft, after long, fharp, and dangerous debaites, the Houfes weell near fullie agreed, that on his tryall, both the Houfes fliall fitt together in the large outer-hall of Weftminfter: that the Lower Houfe fhall litt there, not as a Houfe, with their Speaker, bot as a Committee, without their Speaker, to remove when they will to their own Houfe ; that they fliall manage the proceffe and witneffes as they find meet; that for matter of fact there fliall be no counfell; that in matter of right, when his counfell fliall interpret a law againft their minde, that in that cafe they will retire to their Houfe ; and being undoubtedlie conjun6l makers of lawes with the Peers, they will be alfo conjun6t interpreters of everie contravened law. Mr. Stroud, the other day, fell on a notion, to which the moft did greedilie gryp, that is like to end the longfome debates about Strafford's counfell or pleaders. He told the Houfe, that they had charged Strafford of High Treafon; that they had found the articles of the charge treafonable; that they had voyced their witneffes depofitions to be fatiffa6lorie : fo it concerned them to charge as confpirators in the fame treafon, all who had before, or Ihould thereafter, plead in that caufe. If this hold, Strafford's counfell will be rare. This day the carpenters are buffie to fett up the feats for both the Houfes ; when that is done, the Lieutenant muft come to his fentence, and then all affaires will runn. When at once the head of Strafford and the root of Epifcopacie are ftrokin310 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1641. at, there is fome blind feares that the King, not being yet able to abide it, may yet hazard the breaking up of the Parliament. The Irifh armie is not like to diffolve. Worcefter will not come to the Parliament, pretending ficknefs. Herbert, his fone, is much at Court; the papifts in Wales follows him much. The proclamation againft papifts, as yow may read it in print, is fliarp enough, yet it is feared they are bot too ftrong, and too weell armed. The King's armie in Yorke is thought to be in fome better pofture than before. Some furmifes divilions in Scotland. The noife of the Queen's voyadge to France is dilled downe; no moneys for her furniture will be gottin in hafte; and the Cardinall hes no will of her Mother. All thefe things, if we be not mad, will fet us on our watch. God, in his meer mercie, mull end what he hes begun, or yet all may goe verie quicklie to a horrible confufion: never was tears and prayers more feafonable and more neceflar. We were not weell pleafed with the manner, albeit exceeding weell with the matter, that the Lower Houfe fhould have joyned with the King and the Higher Houfe, to have required us to give in all the articles of our laft demand together. We would be molt gladlie at an end ; yet, if we were readie to goe, as we cannot be in hafte, they know and proclaime that they were undone ; yet the unftabillitie and fearfullnefs, and cleaving to their moneys of too many of them, will make us truft them lefTe, and fee the more to our own affaires. The index of our laft demand, and all that yet is paft upon it, yow have here. When my Lord Eglintoun hes perufed them, I know his Lordfhip will communicat all, both wryte and print, to yow. The Marqueis, whatever he hes been, yet now is the beft inftru-ment we have to keep the King's minde in fome tollerable temper; bot malice and envy will not let him goe on to do in both nations all good fervice in quiet. The Lieutenant's friends finding it his apparent good to have the Marqueis joyned with him in danger, laboured to have him accufed of treafon alfo. The Popifh-Epif-copal fa6tion feeing him evidentlie unite with the countrey to draw the King from them, did co-operate with all their power; bot the articles were fo frivolous which they could invent againft him, and his favourers in both Houfes fo many and mightie, that he was glad and defyreous to have that accufation difcuffed; bot the in-tenders of it grew fo faint, that their purpofe feems now to be evanifhed. Yet behold he fell in a greater danger : by his friends in the Houfes he had obtained, for the King's pleafure, fome delay1641. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 311 of tyme for Strafford's anfwer; by this they made the King believe that his power in both the Houfes was fo great, as it was eaiie for him, if he would endeavour it, to gett Strafford's life faved. They wrought it fo, that if he denyed to deall for Strafford he fhould offend the King; if he affayed to deall farder for him, he fhould lofe the Parliament and us all. Yet it is lyke the man, in his great wifdome, will gett both the King and the Parliament keeped, and let Strafford goe where he deferves. All the Englifh minifters of Holland, who are for New-England way, are now here : how ftrong their party will be here, it is di-verfelie reported ; they are all in good termes with us : Our only confiderable difference will be about the jurifdi6lion of Synods and Prefbyteries. As for Brownifts, and Separatifts of many kynds, here they miflyke them weell near as much as we : of thefe there is no confiderable partie. Anent private meetings, we know here no difference we have with anie: Our queftions with them of the new way, we hope to get determined to our mutuall fatiffa6lion, if we were ridd of Bifhops ; and till then, we ha/ve agreed to fpeak nothing of any thing wherein we differ. Mr. Goodwin, Mr. Hooker, Mr. Baroues [Burroughs], Mr. Simonds, have all written verie gracious treatifes of fan6tification, which I minde to bring with me ; all of them are learned, difcreet, and zealous men, weell feen in cafes of confcience. It were all the pities in the world that wee and they fhould differ in anie thing, efpeciallie in that one, which albeit verie fmall in fpeculation, yet in pra6tife of verie hudge con-fequence: for, make me everie congregation ane abfolute and independent Church, over which Prefby tries and Generall Aflem-blies have no power of cenfure, bot onlie of charitable admonition, my witt fees not how incontinent a Nationall Church ftiould not fall into unfpeakable confufions, as I am confident the good-nefs of God will never permit fo gracious men to be the occafions of, let be the authors. How matters goe abroad, you may fee in the printed Gazets I fend. The Portugal! Ambaffador here getts no audience; he is labouring privilie for it: if he cannot obtain it, he goes for Holland, whither onlie he gives out he is dire6led, and comes into England alone by wind and weather. The Hollanders hes a prettie navie, with men and munition, readie for Lifbon. The Duke of Lorrain hes been now fome weeks in Paris, fullie reconciled with the French King; for Lorrain, they fay, he muft be content with Auverne, and fome other lands in the heart of France, where he fhall not312 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1641. be able to fturre: bot to make all lure, the King keeps his firfl wife from him, the heretrix of Lorrain, to whom he mindes to be heir, letting the Duke enjoy his fecond wife, which he did marrie in the Emperour's fervice, when the other did ft ay behind him in France. The King of France, as yow may fee in the Gazet, hes gotten a Frenchman governor of Brifack; by this meane all Bernard of Weymar's conquiefes in Alfatia, are joyned with Lorrain to his crown. The fair Spanifh province of Catilonia hes taken him not only for their prote6tor, but for their true King. He is like, by his too great growth, to draw on himfelf the fear and invy which before was peculiar to Spaine. This is the reafon why Holland, jealous of the French greatnefs, are fo earneft for allyance with England. Every other week the young Prince of Orange is here expedted with his royall and very pompuous traine. The Palatine was bot very drylie welcomed at his firft comeing : the King had written to him not to come fo foone, bot the letters miffed him ; yet, now the King begins to fpeak of his help. This is all comes in my minde for the prefent. The Treatie is continued to the midft of Aprill: it feemes ere then all will be clofed that concerns us : I will affay to be difmiffed before. I truft yow will not faill to continue your care for my flock ; I thank yow all, Dear Brethren, for your bygone affiftance. I promife, by God's grace, if I were at home to give to every one of yow the lyke affiftance on occafion. The Lord be with yow all. Yow muft not faill, as ye love the glory of God, and the weelfare of the Church and State in all the King's dominions, both in your own dayes and for after generations, to ftirr up your own foules, and thefe of your flocks, to earneft fupplications ; for all now is in ane apparent way of profpering as we could wifli; and yet there are fecret ways in hand, more than we know, and will fpeak of, to un-doe all. Bot there is a God who hes done great things for us, and will triumph over the devih, and all the wickednefs of men be who they will: Let us only have a confcience that, come what will, may comfort with the fweet remembrance of our endeavours to doe our duty, and to call upon his name for the weelfare of Sion. Your Brother and fervant, R. Baillie. London, Mononday March 15th [1641.]1641. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 313 Our poft lies flayed beyond our expectation. After long delay, all the anfwer the Peers gave to our long paper of Epifcopacie, was a defyre not to give it in to the Parliament: to this their paper you fee our replie. At laft, after manie paffionat words from Briftoll, we were advyfed it wes our good to lay by our paper of Epifcopacie till Strafford's bulinefs was ended; and fo we have done. The feats and lofts, or, as they call them, the fcaffolds of Weftminfter-hall, are now readie. Mononday is the firft day of Strafford's caufe ; fome thinks his proceffe will be fhort: you lhall know with the nixt. To mollifie the King, they have given him, the other day, the tunnadge and poundage for the nixt three yeares, and fome three fubfidies, which, with the former, makes nyne. The flop of trade here,, through men's unwillingnefs to venture thefe three or four yeares bygone, hes made this people much poorer than ordinare : they will no wayes be able to beare their burden if the Cathedralls fall not. On the Committee for religion in the Higher Houfe, are all the bed Lords : we are made to hope, that againft the intention of the inventors of it, it may prove a good meane of undoeing the Biftiops. The Portugall Ambaffador is over to Holland ; one exprefflie for England is landed: after long debate at the Councill-table, it is refolved he fhall have audience, efpeciallie fince the King of Spaine did receave the Bavarian Am-baffadors, as of the Prince Ele6lor Palatine, for all that Briftoll, then in Spain, could fay to the contrair, bot moft of all becaufe the Portugall offers libertie of religion, and other fair conditions, to the Englifh merchants. They are fpeaking of Sir Thomas Roe going to Ratifbone yet once from the King. They wryte that Burgundie hes fent to Parife, to treat for their fubje6tion to the Crowne of France. Fryday, 19th [of March, 1641.] [Letter to the Presbytery of Irvine, containing a Journal of the Earl of Strafford's Trial.] Reverend and Dear Brethren, Since, much befyde my expectation, my ftay here is continued, my letters to yow would have been more frequent, except I had been waiting to have feen bufinefs come at laft towards fome finall314 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1641. conclufion, or at leaft to fuch a poynt that a man might have made fome certain conje6ture when and in what fafhion the end was likelie to be; hot this, after fo long expectation, not yet being pof-fible, I mult leave it to farder tyme, and give yow fome accompt of what is paft fince my laft, about the 18th of March. Yow heard of our ingyving the Index of all the articles of our laft demand, and of our earneft defyre to have the Treatie concluded fo foon as they could wifh. For fome dayes there was hot contefts betwixt our Commiffioners and my Lord of Briftoll for our paper of Epifcopacie ; he requireing we would paffe it by, or elfe draw it fhort to a fimple propofition without reafons, fo that it behooved us to have in that paper to the Houfes of Parliament, as it ftood for our exoneration before God and man, and that we would acquiefce to the Parliament's anfuer therein, whatever it might be. At laft, being advertifed that the prefent giving in of that paper, might move divifion in both Houfes, betuixt thefe who were diverflie affe6ted towards Epifcopacie, and that any divifion among them, till Strafford's proceffe were clofed, might prove un-happie; we were contented to lay by for a time that article till Strafford's affair were over, and go on in the reft of our articles concerning our laft demand: and, to the end we might make good our word of our defire to be at ane end, the Commiffioners divided the articles among them, and before the end of March had all reddie. We gave all in before any anfuer could be gotten to any one of them. I have fent all to yow here in fome four or five flieets of paper. Since, we have been prefling them from tyme to tyme to give us anfuers, who before urged us to give in our pro-pofitions ; bot to this day no anfuer fatiffa6lorie to one poynt can be obtained. The world now feeth that the delay is alone upon their fide. Their conftant attendance on Strafford is pretended to be the caufe ; and truelie it is a great part of the reafon why our bufineffe, and all other elfe, have been fo long fufpended. Among manie moe, I have been ane affiduous afiiftant of that nation, and therefore I will offer to give you fome accompt of a part I have heard and feen in that moft notable proceffe. Weftminfter Hall is a roome as long as broad if not more than the outer houfe of the High Church of Glafgow, fupponing the pillars wer removed. In the midft of it was ere6led a ftage like to that prepared for the Affemblie of Glafgow, but much more large, taking up the breadth of the whole Houfe from wall to wall, and of the length more than a thrid part. At the north end was fet a1641. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 315 throne for the King, and a chayre for the Prince; before it lay a large wooll-feck, covered with green, for my Lord Steward, the Earle of Arundaill; beneath it lay two other fecks for my Lord Keeper and the Judges, with the reft of the Chancerie, all in 'their red robes. Beneath this a little table for four or fyve Clerks of the Parliament in their black gouns ; round about thefe fome furmes covered with green freefe, whereupon the Earles and Lords did litt in their red robes, of that fame falhion, lyned with the fame whyte ermin Ikinnes, as yow fee the robes of our Lords when they ryde in Parliament; the Lords on their right fleeve having two barres of whyte Ikinnes, the Vifcounts two and ane half, the Earles three, the Marquefs of Wincefter three and ane half. England hath no more Marquefles : and he bot one late upftart of creature of Queen Elizabeth's. Hamilton goes here bot among the Earles, and that a late one. Dukes, they have none in Parliament: York, Richmond, and Buckinghame are but boyes ; Lennox goeth among the late Earles. Behinde the formes where the Lords fitt, there is a barr covered with green : at the one end ftandeth the Committee of eight or ten gentlemen, appoynted by the Houfe of Commons to purfue ; at the midft there is a little dafk, where the pri-foner Strafford ftands and fitts as he pleafeth, together with his keeper, Sir William Balfour, the Lieutenant of the Tower. At the back of this is a dalk, for Strafford's four fecretars, who carries his papers and affifts him in writing and reading; at their fide is a voyd for witnefles to ftand ; and behinde them a long dalk at the wall of the room for Strafford's counfell-at-law, fome five or fix able lawers, who were [not] permitted to difputt in matter of fa6t, bot queftions of right, if any Ihould be incident. This is the order of the Houfe below on the floore ; the fame that is ufed dailie in the Higher Houfe. Upon the two fides of the Houfe, eaft and weft, there arofe a ftage of elevin ranks of formes, the higheft touching almoft the roof; everie one of thefe formes went from the one end of the roome to the other, and contained about fortie 'men; the two higheft were divided from the reft by a raill, and a raill cutted off at everie end fome featts. The gentlemen of the Lower Houfe did fitt within the raile, others without. All the doores were keeped verie ftraitlie with guards ; we alwayes behooved to be there a little after five in the morning. My Lord Willoughbie Earle of Lindefay, Lord Chamberland of England, (Pembroke is Chamberland of the Court,) ordered the Houfe, with great difficultie. James Maxwell, Black-Rod, was great ulher;316 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1641. a number of other fervant gentlemen and knights aflifted. By favour we got place within the raile, among the Commons. The Houfe was full dailie before feven ; againft eight the Earle of Strafford came in his barge from the Tower, accompanied with the Lieutenant and a guard of mufqueteers and halberders. The Lords, in their robes, were fett about eight; the King was ufuallie halfe ane howre before them : he came not into his throne, for that would have marred the action ; for it is the order of England, that when the King appears, he fpeaks what he will, bot no other fpeaks in his prefence. At the back of the throne, there was two roomes on the two fydes ; in the one did Duke de Vanden, Duke de Vallet, and other French nobles litt; in the other, the King, the Queen, Princeffe Mary, the Prince Elector, and fome Court ladies; the tirlies, that made them to be fecret, the King brake doun with his own hands ; fo they fatt in the eye of all, bot little more regarded than if they had been abfent; for the Lords fatt all covered; thefe of the Lower Houfe, and all other except the French noblemen, fatt difcovered when the Lords came, not elfe. A number of ladies wes in boxes, above the railes, for which they payed much money. It was dailie the moft glorious Affemblie the Ifle could afford ; yet the gravitie not fuch as I expe6ted; oft great clamour without about the doores; in the intervalles, while Strafford was making readie for anfwers, the Lords gott alwayes to their feet, walked and clattered ; the Lower Houfe men too loud clattering ; after ten houres, much publi6t eating, not onlie of confe6tions, bot of flefh and bread, bottles of beer and wine going thick from mouth to mouth without cups, and all this in the King's eye ; yea, manie but turned their back, and lett water goe through the formes they fatt on: there was no outgoing to returne ; and oft the fitting was till two, or three, or four a'clock. 1. The firft Seffion was on Mononday the 22d of March. All being fett, as I have faid, the Prince in his robes on a little chyre at the fyde of the throne, the Chamberland and Black-Rod went and fetched in my Lord Strafford; he was alwayes in the fame fute of black, as in doole. At the entrie he gave a low courtefie, proceeding a little, he gave a fecond, when he came to his dafk a third, then at the barr, the fore-face of his dafk, he kneeled ; ryfe-ing quicklie, he faluted both fydes of the Houfes, and then fatt doun. Some few of the Lords lifted their hatts to him: this was his dailie carriage. My Lord Steward, in a fentence or two, fliew1641. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 317 that the Houfe of Commons had accufed the Earle of Strafford of High Treafon, that he was there to anfuer; that they might manadge their evidence as they thought meet. They defyred one of the clerks to read their impeachment. I fent yow long agoe the printed copie. The firft nine articles, being hot generalities, were paft; the twentie-eight of the farder impeachment wer all read. The clerk's voyce was fmall, and after the midft, being broken, was not heard by manie. My Lord of Strafford was, in his anfwer, verie large, accurat, and eloquent; confifting of a preamble, wherein he fhew, of eight or nine articles, the good fervice he had done to the Crowne and countrey dureing the tyme of his employment, and of particular anfuers to the twentie-eight articles of the charge. The reading of it took up large three houres. His friends was fo wary that they made three clerks read by turnes, that all might hear. I marked that he did ftryve to call all the blame upon Sir Harie Vaine; alfo that the Irifti armie was to land at the Troon, and to goe firft to Aire ; and that they had fpyes in our armie before Newburne, who told them our great ftraits for want of vi6tuall; alfo that he laboured to clear Traquair of the caufe of the laft warre, as if Traquair had onlie made a narration according to a prior difcourfe, which in the Privie Councill was made by a noble and great perfonadge ; whether the Marquis, or the Earle Holland, or who elfe, we know not: onlie he diffembled, that that prior difcourfe, made by whomsoever, was taken out of information from Scotland, which are to be feen in tyme and place. After all, Strafford craved leave to fpeak ; bot the day being fo far fpent, to two or three a'clock, he was refufed, and the Lord Steward (6) adjourned the Houfe till the morrow at eight of cloak. 2. The fecond Seflion on Tuefday 23d. The King and Queen, and all, being fett as the day before, Mr. Pym had a long and eloquent oration, onlie againft the preamble of his anfwer, wherein he laboured to ftiew, that all thefe meritorious a6ts whereof Strafford did glorie, were nothing but differvices; that no praife of making good lawes in Ireland could be due to him, who made his own will above all law; the Parliaments he had keeped there, though they were more in number than that land had feen in fiftie (6) In the following Journal of the Earl of Strafford's Trial, it has not been thought necessary to retain the peculiar orthography of Baillie's amanuensis, in regard to many of the names mentioned; such, for instance, as Lord Stewart, Glen, Queim, Lofties, Bramble, &c. for the Lord High Steward, Glyn, Gwyn, Loftus, Bramhall, &c.318 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1641. years before him, yet they were no benefite, fince Parliamentarie freedome was fuppreffed in them. This was proven by a number of witneffes. Sir John Clotworthie, my Lord Ranulagh, and others, being called, came to the barr, kiffed the book, prefented to them by one of the Clerks of the Parliament; deponed that fundrie who had voyced or reafoned againft bills prefented by the Deputie in Parliament, were threatened by him, or his inteer friend Sir George Ratcliffe. The firft witnefs, Sir Pierce Crofbie, who, for voyceing againft the bill of powder, had been by Strafford call out of the Councill, was excepted againft, as one who pretended to be wronged and grieved. The Lords adjourned his depofition till the morrow ; at which tyme they decerned, that although Sir Pierce had been degraded, and was prifoned by Strafford, and was lyable to anfwer for breaking of ward, and fleeing out of the land, yet treafon being the King's caufe, and he acquireing no benefite to himfelf by his teftimonie, his depofition fliould be receaved, bot with confidera-tion. This was a precedent; fo that thereafter no exception of wrongs, either receaved or alleadged, did fett any witnes. What he bragged, of advanceing the King's rent, and making it fufficient to defray the King's ordinar expence in Ireland, which before him was not; of his advancing the cuftomes; of benefiteing the Church; all this by witneffes was proven to be naught; that, long before his comeing, no monie came out of the Inglifh Treafurie for the Irtfh affaires after the year 1621, except feven thoufand pound a-year for maintainance of fome fhipping on the Irifh coaft, which yet was defrayed by the Irifh rent or contribution the year before liis over-comeing. No marvell he had payed ane hundred thoufand pound that the King was aughtin there, and left in the Treafurie ane other hundred thoufand pound; for he had gotten firft fix fubfidies, and then four fubfidies, notwithftanding the King in Ireland was for the prefent in great debt; that he had advanced the cuftomes from two to fifteen thoufand pound a-year, bot for more gain to himfelf than to the King ; that he [had] taken out of the Treafurie fundrie great foumes of money for his own ufe ; that he advanced the Church-rents indeed, bot that he did it onlie to pleafe Canterburie ; that he did it againft law, that rapine of men's eftates was no facrifice pleafant to God; that his care of the Church. might be feen in the perfons whom he had advanced, Bramhall, Athertoun, Gwyn, my Lord Cork's under-coatchman; that how weell law and juftice was adminiftred by him, the Remon-ftrance of the Irifh Parliament did declare, which they required1641. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 319 to be read as a teftimonie of his great injuftice. He excepted, that he was not charged with their remonftrance; that it was to prove a charge by a charge; that there was a correfpondence and confpiracie betuixt thefe of Ireland and thefe of England againft him. Maynard preffed, that the Remonftrance might be read, not as a charge, bot as a public teftimonie of his unjuftice, to contra-di6t what he faid in his preamble of his juftice in Ireland: He craved juftice in name of all the Commons of England, who were fclandred as confpirators by my Lord of Strafford. For this rafh-nefs, Strafford on his knees craved pardon, and declared on his oath, though few believed him, that he underftood none in the Honourable Houfe of Commons, either Englifti or Irifh, bot fome of both kingdomes, not members of Parliament. The Lords fand the gentlemen of the Houfe of Commons defyre to have that Remonftrance read reafonable. So when one at the barr had kifled the book, which is the order of their oath, and attefted the prefent paper to be a true copie, which was ever done in all the papers that were read, one of the clerks did read it: by hearing of this Remonftrance, Strafford lofed much of his reputation. When Pym had ended, the Earle required tyme, if it were bot to the morrow, to anfwer fo heavie charges, manie whereof was new. After debate pro and contra, one of the Lords fpake of the adjourning their houfe, and preffed their priviledge, that at the motion of any one Lord the Houfe behooved to be adjourned; fo the Lords did all retire to their own Houfe above, and debaited among themfelves the queftioun for a large half-houre. During their abfence, though in the eye of the King, all fell in clattering, walking, eating, toying; bot Strafford, in the midft of all the noife, was ferious with his Secretars, conferring their notes and wryting. The Lords returned, the Steward pronounced their interloqutor, That the matters fpoken being all of fa6l, and that onlie in anfwer to his own preamble, he ftiould make ane anfwer without any delay. So, without figne of repining, the Earle anfwered fomething to all had been faid; inftanced fome of his good lawes ; made fome appologie for Bramhall, Athertoun, Gwyn ; read a lift of good divynes which he had fent for from England, and had pro-vyded weell; confeffed he had taken out of the Treafurie fifteen thoufand pound, wherewith he had bought to the King lands of two thoufand pound rent; alfo, that he had borrowed from the Thefaurer twentie-four thoufand pound, which was now repayed : bot for that he produced a warrand under the King's hand to take320 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1641. out of the Treafurie fortie thoufand pound for fetting up a magazine of tobacco. It was thought that letter was hot latelie pur-chafed. He fhew, he had a greater heart than to make my Lord of Canterburie's pleafure the end of his actions ; that he took his prefent afflictions from God for his other fins ; that he was confident to take off the evill opinion which the Honourable Houfe of Commons had conceaved of him. He protefted, he was the fame man [he was] before when he was one of their number, and well refpe&ed among them. Mr. Pym replyed fhortlie and weell, referring the generalls to be proven by particulars, as they fell in the charge to be handled. 3. Wednefday 24th. Mr. Maynard handled the firft of the twentie-eight articles. By way of preface, he relumed, to make Strafford odious, the chief of the things fpoken the former day, preffing the grievoufnefs of his cryme, to bring in, by force of armes, in England and Ireland, ane arbitrarie government. The Lower Houfe had appointed fome eight of .their number in a Committee to fland at the barr and plead by turne, as they thought meet to divide the articles. On the firft, fundrie fworn witneffes did depone, his threatening to obtaine ane larger power to punifh than was before ; alfo, that in his new commiffion and inftru6tions were infert claufes of a power of the Chancerie and Starr Chamber, whereby he and his colleagues were enabled to decyde any kinde of caufes otherwayes than the law did provyde, which no prefident of Yorke before had ever attempted. Befyde, that he had obtained ane article in his inftruCtions, to hinder prohibitions or appeals from his Court to any other, and had committed fundrie for bringing of prohibitions, even before thefe inftructions were obtained. In his anfuer, he required permillion, to retire a little to ane other roome, for collecting of himfelf, and better preparation to anfwer every article: this was refufed. He proved, he was in Ireland, or at leaft not in York, after the tyme they alleadged thefe inftrudtions were purchafed. It was replyed, they preffed, and had proven the matter, whatever became of the precife circumftance of tyme : it was alyke whether he or his deputies did execute ane illegall commiffion obtained by him. He made ane generall anfwer, and almoft in every article repeated it; though the poynt alleadged were proven, yet it would be bot a mifdemeanour ; that ane hundred mifdemeanours would not make one fellonie, and ane hundred fellonies not one treafon, being a cryme of a diverfe kinde and nature. It was alfe often anfwered, that his treafon was the fubver-1641. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 321 fion of all the fundamentall lawes, and introducing ane arbitrarie and tyrannick government; that eyerie article was hot ane evidence of his words and deeds to evince this his purpofe and endeavour. He alleadged, that what was charged in the firft article, was bot ane enlargement of his own jurifdi&ion ; and this in a judge was a very chafte ambition. It were tedious to report all their quick pafiages. The third article, That he would make the King's little finger heavier than the loynes of the law, this was proven by fundrie. Among other, Sir David Fowles, whom he had crufhed, came to depone. He excepted againft him as one who had a quarrell againft him. Maynard produced his own decree, fubfcryved by his own hand, That whereas Sir David had brought before him the fame exception againft a witnefs, he had decerned, that a witnefs for the King and Commonwealth behooved to be receaved, notwithftand-ing any private quarrells. When he faw his own hand, he faid no more, bot, in a jefting way, Yow are wyfer, my Lord, than to be ruled by any of my a6tions as paterns. For the matter, he pro-tefted, he had fpoken the clean contrare : that they had found the little finger of the law heavier than the loynes of the King; fpeak-ing to thefe who, by law, and pleading againft the fhip-moneys, had fpent much more than the King had required of them :—for this he produced Sir William Pennyman for a witnefs, who both here, and manie tymes elfe, deponed poynt blank all he requyred. This knight was one of the Lower Houfe. Mr. Maynard de-fyred him to be pofed, (for no man there did fpeak to any other, bot all the fpeech was dire6led to my Lord Steward : all the questions any requyred to be alked, were alked all by him onlie :) Maynard requyred Sir William to be pofed, when, and at what tyme, he was brought to the remembrance of thefe words of my Lord Strafford's ? All of us thought it a verie needlefs motion. Sir William anfwered, Since the firft fpeaking of them they were in his memorie, bot he called them moft to remembrance fince my Lord Strafford was charged with them. Maynard prefentlie catched him, That he behoved to be anfwerable to the Houfe for negle6l of dutie, not being only filent, bot voyceing with the reft to this article, wherein Strafford was charged with words whereof he knew he was free. There arofe with the word fo great an hifiing in the Houfe, that the gentleman was confounded, and fell a-weeping. Strafford protefted, he would rather committ himfelf to the mercie of Gocl alone, giving over to ufe anie witnefs in his vol. i. x322 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1641. defence, before anie, for witneffing the truth in his behalf, fhould in-curr anie danger or difgrace. 4. Thurfday the 25th of March, the firft day of the year in England, Maynard handled the third article, Ihew, that Ireland by di-verfe laws had all the priviledges of Magna Charta, and was governed by the common law in England, being for the mod part Ingliih blood; yet that my Lord Strafford had avowed them to be a conquered nation, whom the King might ufe as he pleafed, and that the chartours of Dubline were annuled ; notwithftanding that the Irifh Commiffioners had obtained, in the year 1621, in-ftru6tions from King James to Deputie Falkland, bearing the government to be by the common law, and the Deputie or Coun-cill fhould not medle with anie a6tions of inheritance, except thefe that concerned the Church, or the firft plantation, or which were recommended from the Councill of England. My Lord Cork was firft called to depone. Strafford excepted, and required ane information againft him to be read: bot being a councillor in Ireland, he was receaved, and no information againft him was heard. He and other three or four deponed clearlie the words of the article ; adding, that Strafford had repeated them in the face of both Houfes of Parliament; faying farder, that the inftru6lions were drawn from King James by narrow-hearted petitioners who did not underftand the rules of government. My Lord Strafford required farder to anfwer to things obje6ted the former day; bot was refufed. He required permilfion to retire and advyfe about the prefent obje6tions; bot all which could be obtained was a little tyme's advyfement in the place he was in. So hereafter it was Strafford's conftant cuftome, after the end of his adversaries fpeech, to petition for tyme of recollection ; and, obtaining it, to litt down with his back to the Lords, and molt dili-gentlie to read his notes, and wryte anfwers, he and his fecretars, for ane halfe hour, in the midft of a great noife and confufion, which continowed ever till he arofe againe to fpeak. He prefaced the miffortune of the moft of his predeceffors the Deputies of Ireland, who, after their beft fervices, have fallen into publi6l challenges ; alfo the great infirmitie of his body, and greater of his fpirit; that he wifhed earneftlie to fee ane end of this caufe ; that were it not for the caufe of his motherlefs children, he rather would loffe his life, than with fuch a longfome and bitter toyle in his fpirit to defend it; that the article, though proven, was not treafonable ; that words, according to the ftatute of Edward the Sixth, not1641. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 323 challenged in 30 dayes after their fpeaking, were no treafon; that the conqueffe of Ireland, and power to the firft conqueifors to im-pofe lawes, was not doubtfull; that he had fpoken this of King Charles ; that he had remembered, in the beginning of the Parliament, this antient condition of that kingdome, to amplifie fo much the more their prefent happinefs under the legall reign of King Charles that the chartours of Dublin were truelie faultie in manie things, and prejudiciall both to the Crowne, to the Religion, and wealth of the land, and City itfelf, yet that he had never queftion-ed them. Maynard replyed to all ex tempore verie weell: I did marvell much at firft of their memories, that could anfwer and reply to fo manie large alleadgeances, without the miffing of anie one poynt; bot I marked, that both the Lieutenant when they fpake, and they when he fpake, did wryte their notes, and in their fpeeches did look on thefe papers; yea, the moft of the Lords and Lower Houfe did wryte much dailie, and none more than the King. That is ftrange in this great judicatorie, that nothing at all is dyted, bot in a continued fpeech all fpoken, and the clerks take what they can; fo that in the pronouncing of the fentences, the Judges who wants their own wryte-notes, hath much to doe in their memorie. So long as Maynard was principall fpeaker, Mr. Glyn lay at the wait, and ufwallie obferved fome one thing or other, and uttered it fo pertinentlie, that fix or feven tymes in end he gott great applaufe by the whole Houfe. 5. Fryday 26th. Mr. Glyn handled the fourth article, of de-cideing at the Councill-table caufes of inheritance, as that of my Lord of Cork's, upon paper petitions, and equalling A6ts of Coun-cill to A6ts of Parliament. The day before, Mr. Glyn had begun to difcourfe on the article, and called my Lord Ranulagh, a privie councillor of Ireland, to depone. Strafford requyred he might be interrogat, Whether or not it was the cuftome of Deputies before him, to decide fuch caufes at the Councill-table ? and whether or not it was not his oune ufwall pra6tice, in Connaught, where he was prefident, on paper petitions to decide caufes ? Glyn excepted, that he fhould not be pofed with fuch queftions, being felf accu-fations. When this grew to ane hot conteft, and the Houfe was goeing to adjourn, the Lower Houfe wes content to referr all to the morrow. So at the beginning, my Lord Steward fhew the Lords opinions, which was allwayes a decree, that my Lord Ranulagh Ihould depone his knowledge of the pra6tife of the De-putie at Councill and fuperiour judicatories, bot fhould not be324 LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 1641. queftioned anent the pra6life of inferiour judicatories and his oune. My Lord Cork, the richefl by farr of the King's fubjecls, fatt among the Lords with his hat on dailie, hot in' his black cloak : he fpake foftlie, bot eyill; bot witneffed fullie and to a word, as Strafford told him after. All this was in the charge : other three alfo did fo. Strafford, after his halfhoures delay, came to his anfwer, regrated (as oft before and after) the want of tyme to bring his papers and witnefles out of Ireland: yet, as Glyn could weell tell, there was few, either men or papers, he could have ufe of, bot they were alwayes, by one good luck or other, readie at the barr. He re-quyred a certificat to be redd from the Councill-table of Ireland ; bot was refufed, becaufe none could attefl on oath the truth of the copie; bot he obtained the reading of ane order of the Lower Houfe in Ireland, for feafing on his papers, on his tobacco, and the moll of the goods he had there, as if he had been alreadie condemned traitor. Of this outrage he complained tragicallie; bot Glyn fhew, that the matter belonged nothing to the purpofe in hand, and that there had been no more done, bot fome of his goods feafed for fecuritie of great foumes, whereof he and his officers was indebted to the Crowne. He triumphed, that by accident he had gotten a certificat that morning, that Gwyn, the coatchman-vicar was Mr. of Arts, and required it to be read; bot was reje6led as impertinent. The Councill-table's order againft my Lord Cork was read : It proved no more, bot that the Coun-cill had joyned with him in that, as in manie other illegall a6liones. He fhew, that the Councill of Ireland had much more power than the Councill of England; that it was neceffarie to be fo, for the governing of that barbarous and unquiet people. He fell out here in a daintie difcourfe of keeping the King's prerogative and priviledges of the people in ane equall ballance ; fhew, that however King James's inflru6tions had reflri6led the power of the Councill of Ireland in manie things, yet that exprefllie the determination of ecclefiaftick poffeffions, fuch as thefe of my Lord of Cork was, remained in their power. For his words magnifying the Councill A6ts too much, they were proven, he faid, bot by one witnefs : as for Sir Pierce Crofbie, he valued not his teftimonie; he had never regarded him fo much as to fpeak to him at table fo familiarlie: for this he called my Lord Caftlehaven, who, at the tyme alleadged, was at the table, to witnefs. He deponed, that fome fuch thing was fpoken at that tyme to Crofbie by Strafford.1641. LETTERS AND JOURNALS. 325 He vilified alfo the teftimonie of my Lord Killmallock againft him ; becaufe he had fworne that Ratcliffe was his echo, a thing im-poffible. My Lord Digbie made a grave replie to this, that the oath of a witnefs is not to be applyed to every feverall word of his depofition ; that the words challenged might have a good and true fenfe. Strafford did extenuate his own words; that he might have faid ane A61 of Councill was binding, to witt, in cafes not pro-vyded for by Parliament, and to the tyme a Parliament fhould provyde. Glyn and Maynard replyed ftiarplie, that his defigne was weell manifefted by thefe his words, to bring in ane arbitrarie government without law; and how much he fcorned lawes, they called for another witnefs to depone. This he vehementlie op-pofed, that no referved witnefs, after the examination was clofed, fhould be heard. They alleadged the pra6tife in all courts, to call for witneffes, ever while the probation of the charge was clofed ; that all the articles were bot ane and the fame charge; befyde, that he, in his anfwer, had brought new matter, which they behoved to refute by thefe witneffes. Briftoll required the adjourning the Houfe; the Lords, after half ane houre's abfence in their own Houfe, returned, and found it reafonable that their witnefs ought and fhould be heard. He deponed, that when the Lower Houfe of the Irifh Parliament had oppofed the Deputie's bill concerning the felling of powder, he faid, he did not regard it; for he would make ane A61 of Councill thereanent, which Ihould be as binding as ane Act of Parliament. It were tedious to fett down what paffed day lie, aim oil from eight to three ; I onlie poynt at fome principall things, which I brought away on my memory, without any wryting. 6. Saturday, the 6th Seffion, 27th of March, the day of Coronation : We were deived all day with the ringing of bells. The Lords that day waited half ane hour, and the King a whole [hour], before Strafford came : at laft he came, and excufed his delay with the contrarietie both of wind and tyde. Glyn fell on the fifth article, his pra