﻿﻿﻿﻿BRITISH DOGS

THEIR

VARIETIES, HISTORY, CHARACTERISTICS, BREEDING,
MANAGEMENT, AND EXHIBITION.


ILLUSTRATED WITH

PORTRAITS OF DOGS OF THE DAY.


By HUGH D^LZIEL (“ Corsincon”)

Author of “ The Diseases of Dogs,” “ The Diseases of Horses,” &c.,
ASSISTED BY EMINENT FANCIERS.


London:

“THE BAZAAR” OFFICE, 170, STRAND, W.C.﻿LONDON :

PRINTED BY ALFRED BPADLEY. 170, STRA'D, W.C﻿PREFACE

When reminded by the Publisher that a dozen or so lines of Preface
were needful in introducing “ British Dogs ” to the public, the following
questions were forcibly presented to my mind : First, whether the book
should have been written; and, secondly (given the necessity for it)
whether I should have undertaken the work.

Both these questions I propose handing over to the reader for solution,
as I fear I might not be altogether an unprejudiced judge; and in doing
so I trust to his good nature to treat leniently all faults, and to his good
sense to assimilate whatever may be found worthy.

The objeot aimed at has been to give, as far as obtainable, a sketch
of the origin of each breed, and an accurate description of the points
of excellence of each variety as demanded by modern taste.

Only the initiated know the minute distinctions between breeds and
individual dogs, patent to the subtle discrimination of the present-day
philo-kuon.

My fitness, if fitness there be, to convey this olass of information—
much Bought after nowadays—has been aoquired as oanine critic for

The Field, as kennel editor of The Country, and as a judge at shows,﻿iv

Preface.

in which capacities I have visited many of the great exhibitions of the
canine species in Prance, Germany, and America, as well as all the
principal ones in the United Kingdom, where I have had exceptional
opportunities of enlarging a knowledge of my favourite animals, which
I had all my life been accumulating.

There are parts of the book I can refer to with unqualified pleasure
and unstinted praise, namely, the chapters contributed by the friends
who have so kindly and ably assisted me. These contributions are in all
cases accredited to the individual authors, and the views expressed must
command, as they well deserve, the respect which the great experience
of the writers’ merits.

The illustrations are from life, celebrated “ Dogs of the Day” having
been selected, and the artists have, in most instances', succeeded in
giving very correct delineations, showing the distinguishing character-
istics of each breed.

“CORSINCON.”﻿CONTENTS.

Introductory

Page

1—10

DIVISION I.

Dogs Used in Field Sports.

Group I.—Dogs that Hunt their Game by Sight and
Kill. Including—The Greyhound, the Scotch Deerhound,
the Irish Wolfhound, the Scotch Rough-haired Greyhound,
the Luroher, the Whippet, the Siberian Wolfhound, the
Persian Greyhound........................................13—49

Group IT.—Dogs that Hunt their Game by Scent and
Kill. Including—The Bloodhound, the Foxhound, the
Otterhound, the Harrier, the Beagle, the Basset, the
Dachshund, the Schweisshund..........................50—102

Group III.—Dogs that find their Game by Scent, and
Index it for the Advantage of the Gun. Including—

The English Setter, the Irish Setter, the Gordon or Black
and Tan Setter, the Spanish Pointer, the Pointer, the
Dropper -	103—133

Group IV.—Dogs used with the Gun in Questing and
Retrieving Game. Including—The Blaok Spaniel, the
Cooker Spaniel, the Clumber Spaniel, the Sussex Spaniel,
the Norfolk Spaniel, the Irish Water Spaniel, the English
Water Spaniel, the Black Wavy-ooated Retriever, the
Black Curly-coated Retriever, the Norfolk Retriever, the
Russian Retriever...........................' -	- 134—171﻿VI.

Contents.

Exhibiting.—Dog Shows and Dog Judging, and Standard pa<>e
of Excellence by which to Judge. Including—

The History of Dog Shows, Objects and Management of
Dog Shows, the Judges : their Election, &c., Judging by
Points, Standard of Excellence..............172—192

DIVISION II.

Dogs Useful to Man in other Work than Field Sports.

Group I.—Dogs specially Used by Man as Assistants in
his Work. Including—The Scotch Colley, the Smooth-
coated Colley, the Bearded Colley, the English Bob-tailed
Sheepdog or Drover’s Dog, the Esquimaux Dog, the
Truffle Dog................................ 195—217

Group II.—Watchers and Defenders of Life and Pro-
perty, Companion and Ornamental Dogs. Including—

The Bulldog, the Mastiff, the St. Bernard, the Newfound-
land, the Landseer Newfoundland, the Dalmatian, the
TJiibet Mastiff, the Great Dane, the German Boarhound,
the Bulldogs of Spain and the Continent ... 218—288

Group HI.—Vermin Destroyers r The Terriers. Including
—The Fox Terrier, the Wire-haired Fox Terrier, the
Dandie Dinmont Terrier, the Bedlington Terrier, the Blaok
and Tan Terrier, the Skye Terrier, the Bull Terrier, the
Scotch Terrier, the Irish Terrier, the White English Ter-
rier, the Airedale or Bingley Terrier, the Aberdeen Ter-
rier, Dog Showing, Standard of Excellence -	• -	- 289—392

DIVISION III.

House and Toy Dogs.

Group I.—Dogs which are Distinct Varieties from those
already described. Including—The Blenheim Spaniel,
the King Charles Spaniel, the Pug, the Pomeranian, the
Poodle, the Maltese Terrier, the Yorkshire Terrier - 395—436﻿Contents.

vii.

Group II.—Diminutives op already mentioned Varieties page
and Foreign Toy Dogs occasionally met with at
our Shows. Inducting—The Italian Greyhound, the
Black and Tan Toy Terrier, the Blue and Tan Toy Terrier,
the White Toy Terrier, the Long-haired Toy Terrier, the
Japanese Pug, the Broken-haired Toy Terrier, the Chinese
Crested Dog, the Chinese Edible Dog, Exhibiting Toy Dogs,
Training Pet Dogs, Standard of Excellence for Toy

APPENDIX.

Breeding, Rearing, and General Management of Dogs.

Appendix.—The Management op Dogs. Induding—Object

of Breeding, Breeding, Bearing, General Management - 453—487

Dogs

437—450

﻿﻿BRITISH DOGS﻿﻿BRITISH DOGS

INTRODUCTORY.

Few subjects, and certainly no animal, has been treated with so much
written eloqnenoe as the Dog, nor do we grudge the lavish encomiums
heaped upon him, for they are well deserved.

That we do not follow in the usual course pursued by writers on this
subject there are several reasons. First, the felt want of ability to give
expression to our views and feelings in language at once sufficiently
laudatory and appropriate; secondly, that the several writers who have
assisted in compiling this book may be trusted to do justice to the
breeds they treat of in better terms than we can ; and, lastly, that as the
book is intended to be in great part descriptive of the varieties as seen
and classified at our dog shows, and therefore a practical work, both for
the experienced exhibitor and the tyro whose love for the dog needs no
stimulus, panegyrios on his good qualities are not needed.

In oarrying out our purpose, we have, on a plan we will presently
more fully explain, grouped the dogs, and, as far as possible, given a full,
minute, and acourate description of each variety as it at present exists
and is recognised at our principal dog shows, and illustrated these
descriptions by faithful portraits of dogs of the day that are acknowledged
by the highest authorities to be true representatives of their class.

The subdivision of classes is now so great, and the points that separate
one from another in some cases so minute, that an illustration in
every case is needless, but wherever a sufficient difference of type to

B 2﻿A

British Dogs.

require it exists, we have called in the aid of the artist to explain our
meaning. The pencil greatly assists the pen in showing the difference
between closely allied breeds, and in this the several artists have in most
cases been eminently successful.

No book on dogs would be complete without some notice of the
history and development of the various breeds, as far as it can be traced
by direct testimony or fair inference, but we have not attempted that
well-trodden ground which has hitherto proved so barren, and discussed
the vexed question of the origin of the dog, which remains to the present
time hopelessly obscure, and surrounded with the entanglements of con-
tradictory opinions waiting to be unravelled by a Darwin or a Wallace.

In reference, however, to the origin of the very great number of
varieties which exist, and are ever increasing, we may in many instances
hazard a speculation which may be accepted or rejected at the reader’s
option.

We cannot accept the theory propounded by a recent writer that each
country or district had a peculiar type of wild dog created for it from
which the various breeds of domesticated dogs have sprung. Varieties
can, we think, be accounted for more reasonably and more in accord with
the result of modern research.

Whoever would write the history of dogs must write the history of
man, for in periods as remote as history reaches we find this animal
associated with him as his useful servant. When or how the close
intimacy sprung up which mutual advantage has kept and improved
century after century, it may be impossible, with accuracy, to determine;
but when we consider the extraordinary capacity for service natural to
the dog, his wonderful scenting powers, his great speed, his strength
and endurance, his marvellous cunning, his indomitable courage, his
power of arranging, and facility in carrying out a preconcerted attack on
his prey, we see a combination of qualities in the dog of the greatest
value to man in his most primitive state, which man’s superior intelligence
would quickly perceive and lead him to wish to appropriate to his own
use, and possibly the conquest was rendered easy by a natural instinct in
the lower animal to trust, love, and serve him. At least in favour of
this we have the fact, which, applies with more or less force to all breeds,
that their greatest pleasure is in serving man and receiving his praise.

When man depended largely on the spoils of the chaBe for sustenance﻿Introductory.

5

the dog wonld be of the utmost value to him, and when the time came
that other of our more domesticated animals were subdued, or partially
so, and the shepherd’s crook was taken up in addition to the rude
instruments of war and chase, the pliant nature of the dog would be
quickly moulded into agreement with the new state of things, and become,
as we find he had in the days of the patriarch Job, and as he still is in
many Countries, both tender and defender of the flocks and herds.

In this case the new duties and conditions of life would develop new
traits of character and variety of form and shape. The shepherd’s dog
would gradually assume a character of his own, and the Nimrods of
those early days would have their own branches of the family chosen as
best suited for their particular purpose, which, being used for special
work, certain faculties being constantly used whilst others were allowed
to lie dormant, the latter would become almost extinguished, and thus
still further divergence of type from the original and differences between
existing breeds become more distinct.

This alone, carried out extensively, as it was certain to be, would
produce great variety in form, size, colour, and capabilities, and with the
growth of civilisation these influences would increase in strength and
variety, and, together with the powerful influence of climate and accidental
circumstanoes, impossible to gauge, fully account for the extraordinary
varieties of form we see in the dog as he exists at present.

Anecdotes of dogs are not embraced in our scheme. We have not
inflicted insipidities of that kind on our readers; these are usually
mere extensions of personal vanity, using the dog as the medium of
praising the writer, and are generally, in addition, a compromise between
the marvellous and the silly, that might be fairly described as attenuated
twaddle. All such we have mercilessly excluded, and found room only
for a few which are exceptionally apt and strongly illustrative of some
distinguishing characteristic.

It may be said that with works to hand, wherein the subject is so well
and exhaustively treated as those of “ Stonehenge,” Touatt, Hamilton,
&o., there is no necessity for further writing on the subject. We trust,
however, the reader will find in the following pages the best justification
of our efforts ; and as this is one of those subjects of which so many
never tire, and on many points of which there is still considerable dif-
ference of opinion, we have reason to hope it will not be without its use,﻿6

British Dogs.

and although there may be little original in what has been written—for
there are many echoes and but few voices—still it is pleasant sometimes
to see old friends in new dresses, and instructive to view even familiar
things through other eyes than our own. It is always interesting to
compare the opinion of the past with those of the present, and to mark
the changes that take place, and, to go no further back, those who have
followed dog shows from their establishment, cannot fail to be struck
with the very great change which has taken place in many varieties for
better or worse, and which are worth while considering.

Before proceeding to explain our grouping of the dogs it may be of
interest to very briefly notice the classification and arrangement adopted
by the principal writers on the subject. The arrangement of dogs by
our dog Bhow committees cannot be considered very satisfactory where
there are the two great divisions of sporting and non-sporting.
No doubt this system has arisen from the fact that the first publicly
recognised dog shows were for sporting dogs only, and the division was
made when other classes were added ; but the distinction appears to us
to be perfectly useless and rather confusing. Why, for instance, should
a fox terrier, used for bolting foxes, be in the sporting division, and
a Dandie Dinmont terrier, used for bolting otters, be in the non-sporting
division ? The arrangement is arbitrary and useless, and those who
frame dog show schedules seem simply to have followed each other in the
matter like sheep through a gap without their bell-wether. We have,
therefore, discarded dog show catalogues as a guide to our arrangements.

We will now hark back to one of the oldest English writers on dogs,
and we believe the first to attempt a classification, Dr. Johannns Caius.
In his treatise on “ Englishe Dogges ” he adopted a classification very
quaintly expressed, but which has much to recommend it, its principle
being based on the dog’s relation to man, and the uses to which man puts
him; and he makes three great divisions, namely, sporting dogs, useful
dogs otherwise employed, and toys. He says : “All English dogges be
eyther of, A gentle kind, serving the game, A homely kind, apt for sundry
necessary uses, or A Currish kind, meet for many toyes.” The first of
these he subdivides into two kinds, those used in hunting, including
harriers, terriers, bloodhounds, gazehounda, greyhounds, lyemmers, and
tumblers, and those used in fowling, which includes the land Bpaniel,
water spaniel, setter, and the fisher. The second division, or ‘ ‘ homely﻿Introductory.

7

kind,” contains the “shepherd’s dogge” and the mastive or bandogge,
with a few others not very clearly defined, as “ the mooner ” and “ the
iynckers curre.” The third division, or the “currish kind,” he de-
scribes as “onrres of the mongrel and rascall sort,” and it consists of
three varieties : “the wappe or wamer,” “the tnrnspete,” and “the
dancer.” This arrangement of Caius has been followed by Pennant,
Daniel, and other writers.

We will now refer to the classification adopted by “Stonehenge,”
although it will be familiar to most of our readers, but we do so to show
that the same principle is applied, though, of course, the latter writer
had a greater subject to handle, and the manner of using the dog has
considerably changed in three centuries ; but on the same plan he gives
us a fuller and more detailed arrangement, namely, first, wild and half-
reolaimed dogs ; second, dogs hunting chiefly by the eye; third, dogs
hunting chiefly by the nose, and both finding and killing their game ;
fourth, dogs finding their game by scent, but not killing it, being chiefly
used in aad of the gun (corresponding to the “gentle kind” of Caius
used “ in taking the byrde,” that is, in aid of the net, now supplanted
by the gun) ; fifth, pastoral dogs and those used for draught; sixth,
watoh, house, and toy dogs ; seventh, cross-breeds, retrievers, &c.

It will be seen that these two arrangements, differing in detail, possess
leading features in common ; and now, as in strongest contrast to them,
we will briefly give Cuvier’s arrangements, who separates into three
great divisions, according to the shape of the head and length of jaw.
This places the greyhound, deerhound, dingo, dhole, &c., in one class, and as
many terriers are now bred, it would certainly include them. The second
division, consisting of those with heads moderately elongated, includes
the spaniels, pointer, setter, sheep dogs, and the hounds hunting by
scent, as the foxhound, &c. The third division, with short muzzle and
high skull, includes the bulldog, mastiff, pug, and, in the present
time, would also take in Blenheims and King Charles spaniels.

Now, whatever merits Cuvier’s plan of classifying the dog may possess
from a scientific) point of view, it is useless and confusing to the sports-
man and the fanoier.

Lieut.-Col. C. Hamilton-Smith adopts a similar arrangement, and also
takes into consideration the original geographical distribution, and makes
sub-divisions according to the length and qualify of ooat. On this latter﻿8

British Dogs.

point he lays more stress than any other writer. Tonatt adopts Cuvier’s
system, as does Blaine. Meyriok considers it practically useless. Mr.
C. Linnaeus Martin divides dogs into five groups—greyhounds, Newfound-
lands, spaniels, hounds, and mastiffs, and terriers, which is, at least, as
unsatisfactory as having no arrangement at all, which indeed is the case
with a considerable number of writers, to whom it is perhaps unnecessary
to make further reference.

In dealing with a subject that has been treated by such able writers
as those referred to, and others we have not mentioned, it is not to be
expected, nor is it pretended, that we have anything very original to offer
in the arrangement and grouping we propose; neither do we for a moment
suppose that we have hit on a perfect system of classifying dogs. The
varieties run into each other so imperceptibly, and from the pliant, traot-
able nature of the dog he is put to such various uses, that we often find
varieties the farthest removed from each other in form and structure,
interchanging positions, and each doing what we may term the legitimate
work of the other, so that we can conceive of no system free from flaws and
objections ; but we hope our plan will prove convenient for the discussion
of the history, development, and characteristics of each group with its
individual varieties, and be found of easy and ready reference by those
disposed to refer to it for information.

A word of explanation, and by anticipation of objections to disarm
quibblers.

We have included in “British Dogs” varieties that are not strictly
British, because we think them, like so many breeds introduced in
the past, likely to become British, and meeting with them so often at our
shows, we trust they are, if not yet fully, at least in process of being
acclimatized.

Knowing, also, as Dr. Cains quaintly expresses it, in referring to “ a
new sort of dog just brought out of France,” that “we Englishmen are
marvellous greedy gaping gluttons after novelties, and covetous cormo-
rants of things that be seldom, rare, strange, and hard to get,” we believe
our readers will not severely censure us for travelling a little beyond our
title.

Thanks to the enthusiasm of the Rev. J. Cumming Macdona, J. H.
Murchison, Esq., and a few other gentlemen, the magnificent St. Bernard
is now a British Dog, and so may it be in the future with many another﻿Introductory.

9

noble breed, that need only to come under the genius for stock breeding
so peculiarly English, to have their best qualities fully and quickly
developed.

Of the breeds worthy of being added to our list of British dogs, and
that we would like to see more popular, we may mention that handsome
dog the Barsee or Siberian wolfhound, splendid specimens of which have
been shown by H.R.H the Princess of Wales, the Right Hon. Lady
Emily Peel, and others ; that immense dog, the Great Dane, the finest
specimen of which that has graced the show bench being Mr. Frank
Adcock’s gigantic dog, Satan; that singularly attractive and eminently
useful-looking La Vendee hound, of which Mr. G. De Landre Macdona’s
Ramonneau is a splendid specimen; the basset, as represented by
Mr. E. Millais’ Model and the Earl of Onslow’s team ; those burly tykes,
the Thibet mastiffs, of which H.R.H. the Prince of Wales shows
specimens; and several other attractive varieties we might mention.

The classification we shall adopt is as follows :—

Division I.—Dogs used in Field Sports.

Group I.—Those that pursue and kill their game, depending entirely
or mainly on sight and speed, and little or not at all on their scenting
powers, with varieties bred directly from them : Greyhounds, deerhounds,
whippets, lurchers, &o.

Group II.—Those hunting their game by scent and killing it: Blood-
hounds, foxhounds, otterhounds, harriers, beagles, &c.

Group III.—Those finding the game by scent, but trained to forego
their natural instinct to pursue, and to stand and index the game for the
advantage of the gun : Setters, pointers, &c.

Group TV.—Other varieties used with the gun in questing and
retrieving: All the spaniels and retrievers.

Division n.—Dogs useful to Man,

(as assistants in his work, watchers and defenders of property, life-

savers, companion and ornamental dogs, and destroyers of vermin.)

Group I.—Those specially used as assistants in man’s work : Pastoral
dogs, and dogs used for draught; shepherds’ and drovers’ dogs ; Esqui-
maux, Ac.

Group II.—Watchers and defenders of life and property, life-savers,﻿10

British Dogs.

companion and ornamental dogs, as bull dogs, mastiffs, St. Bernards,
Newfoundlands, Dalmatians, &c.

Group III.—Vermin destroyers: The terriers.

Division III.—House Dogs and Tot Dogs.

Group I.—Those of distinct varieties from foregoing : Pugs, Pome-
ranians, poodles, Blenheims, &c.

Group II.—Those that are merely diminutives of already mentioned
species : The various toy terriers, &c.﻿DIVISION I.

Dogs used in Field Sports.﻿﻿﻿﻿GROUP L

Dogs that hunt their Game by sight, and kill.

1.	Greyhound.

2.	Deerhound.

3.	Irish Wolfhound.

4.	Rough Scotch Grey-

hound.

Including:

5.	Lurcher.

6.	Whippet or Snap Dog.

7.	Siberian Wolfhound.

8.	Persian Greyhound.

The whole of this group is included in Cuvier’s first
division, characterised by head more or less elongated,
parietal bones insensibly approaching each other, and
the condyles of the lozver jaw placed in a horizontal
line with the upper molar teeth.” The general form
is light and elegant, chest deep, with flank more or less
tucked up, long and strong back, and great length from
hip bone to hock joint; the whole appearance giving the
impression of great swiftness, which is a distinguishing
property of the whole group, although not possessed in
an equal degree by each variety. All more or less
show the characteristics of the Canes celeres of the
ancients, and although not in every case running their
game strictly by sight, that is also a leading character-
istic of all.

Chapter I.—THE GREYHOUND.

By Corsincon.

The partioalar variety of Ccvnes venatici grayii of which I propose to
treat, and which possesses an inherent right to occnpy the highest place
in the gronp of dogs hunting by keenness of sight and fleetness of foot,
is the modern British greyhound. I say British, for the time has gone by
when we could speak of English, Scotch, or Irish greyhounds in any other
than the past tense; and the modem greyhound, the most elegant of the﻿14

British Dogs.

canine race, the highest achievement of man’s skill in manipulating the
plastic nature of the dog and forming it to his special requirements, as he
is stripped, in all his beauty of outline and wonderful development, not
only of muscle, but of that hidden fire which gives dash, energy, and
daring, stands revealed a manufactured article, the acme of perfection in
beauty of outline and fitness of purpose; and, whether we see him trying
conclusions on the meadows of Lurgan, the rough hillsides of Crawford
John, or for the blue ribbon of the leash on the flats of Altoar, he is still
the same—the dog in whom the genius of man has so mingled the blood
of all the best varieties, that no one can lay special claim to him. He is
a combination of art and nature that challenges the world, unequalled in
speed, spirit, and perseverance, aud in elegance and beauty of form as far
removed from many of his clumsy ancestors as an English thoroughbred
from a coarse dray horse.

It is not my intention to attempt to trace the history of the greyhound,
or to follow his development from the comparatively coarse, but more
powerful dog from which he derives his origin. The very name has long
been a bone of contention among etymologists ; but, however interesting
to the scholar, the discussion possesses few attractions for the general
reader, the ingenious guessing and nice hair-splitting proving often
more confusing than profitable. Not to pass the subject over in com-
plete silence, I may observe that whilst some contend that the name
Ga/nis Grcecus points to a Greek origin, others derive the name from
“grey,” gre or grie, supposed to be originally the prevailing colours;
others, with apparently greater reason, suppose the name to have been
given on account of the high rank or degree the dog held among his
fellows.

The greyhound having been always kept for the chase, would naturally
undergo modifications with the changes in the manner of hunting, the
nature of the wild animals he was trained to hunt, and the characteristics
of the country in which he was used; and having always, until very
recent times, been restricted to the possession of persons of the higher
ranks, he would have greater care, and his improvement be the better
secured. That his possession was so restricted is shown by the forest
laws of King Canute, which prohibited anyone under the degree of a
gentleman from keeping a greyhound ; and an old Welsh proverb says :
“ Ton may know a gentleman by his horse, his hawk, and his greyhound.”﻿The Greyhound.

15

The alteration in the game laws of modern times, conpled with the great
increase of wealth and leisure, have, by giving impetus to the natural
desire for field sports, characteristic of Englishmen, led to the present
great and'inoreasing popularity of eoursing, and consequent diffusion of
greyhounds through all classes, heightening an honourable competition,
and securing a continued, if not a greater care and certainty of the dogs’
still further improvement.

It is impossible to separate the greyhound from coursing, as we under-
stand it; for, although the sport existed and was practised in a manner
similar to our present system some seventeen hundred years ago, as
described by Arrian in the second century, the thorough organization of
the sport and the condensation of the laws governing it, are not only
essentially British, but, in their present shape, quite modem, and it is
the conditions of the sport that have produced the greyhound of the day,
to which the words—

They are as swift as breathed stags.

Aye, fleeter than the roe,

are more applicable than to any of its predecessors.

If we go back to the earlier centuries of the history of our country, we
find the greyhound used in pursuit of the wolf, boar, deer, &c., in
conjunction with other dogs of more powerful build ; still we can easily
perceive that to take a share in such sports at all he must have been
probably larger, certainly stronger, coarser, and more inured to hardships,
whilst he would not be kept so strictly to sight hunting as the demands of
the present require; still, the material out of which the present dog has
been made was there, and his form and characteristics, even to minute
detail, were recognised, and have been described with an accuracy which
no other breed of dogs has had the advantage of, else might we be in a
better position to understand the value of claims for old descent set up
for so many varieties. And to these descriptions I propose to refer,
to endorse, as well as to make still more clear and emphatic, the points
of excellence recognised as correct by modem followers of the leash.

The whole group to which he belongs is distinguished by the elongated
head, the parietal, side and upper or partition bones of the head shelving
in towards each other, high proportionate stature, deep chest, arched
loins, tuoked-up flank, and long fine tail; and such general form as is﻿i6

British Dogs.

outlined in this description is seen in perfection in the greyhound.
To some it may sound contradictory to speak in one sentence of elegance
and beauty of form, and in the next of a tucked-up flank; and fox-
terrier and mastiff men, who want their favourites well ribbed back,
with deep loin and flanks well filled, to make a form as square as a
prize shorthorn, may object, hut we must remember that beauty largely
consists in fitness and aptitude for the uses designed and the position to
be filled.

This being so, in estimating the greyhound’s claim to be the hand-
somest of the canine race, we must remember for what his various ex-
cellences, resulting in a whole which is so strikingly elegant, is designed.
Speed is the first and greatest quality a dog of this breed can possess ; to
make a perfect dog there are other attributes he must not be deficient in,
but wanting in pace he can never hope to excel. The most superficial
knowledge of coursing or coursing literature will show this, and it is a
quality which, although developed to its present high pitch, has always
been recognised as most important. Chaucer says,

Greihounds he hadde as swift as fowl of flight,

And again—following the example of the immortal scoundrel Wegg—to
drop into poetry, Sir Walter Scott, in his introduction to “ Marmion,”
thus eulogises the speed of the greyhound :

Bemember’st thou my greyhounds true ?

O’er holt or hill there never flew,

From leash or slip there never sprang,

More fleet of foot, more sure of fang.

Well does he deserve the encomium of Markham, who declares he is, “ of
all dogs whatsoever the most princely, strong, nimble, swift, and
valient.”

In addition to speed, the dog must have strength to last out a severe
course, nimbleness in turning, the capacity to catch and bear the hare in
his stride, good killing powers, and vital force to give him dash, staunch-
ness, <■and endurance. What a dog possessing these qualities should be
like, I shall, by the assistance of the keenest and most experienced
observers and writers on the subject, endeavour to show ; and whilst
gladly sitting at the feet of modem Gamaliels, not slighting the wisdom of
the past, but offering gleanings from the works of old, that may prove﻿The Greyhound.

l7

both interesting and instructive to the tyro, although as a tale that hath
been told to many ; and in defence of such a course let me quote Geoffrey
Chaucer:

For out of the old fieldie, as men saith,

Cometh all this new com from year to year;

And out of olde bookis in pood faith,

Cometh all this new science that men lere.

It would be as much out of place here as it is unnecessary to enter on
any lengthened dissertation on coursing—passionately fond of the sport,
next to seeing it it would be a labour of love to write or speak of it, and
it iB almost with pain that I reoall the words of Somerville, whose tastes
preferred

The musical confusion
. Of hounds and echo in conjunction ;

and who, with nnjust prejudice, penned an undeserved censure against
followers of the leash when he wrote :

A different hound for every different chase
Select with judgment; nor the poor timorous hare,

O’er-matched, destroy; but leave that vile offence
To the mean, murderous, coursing crew.

Without going deeply into the subjeot of coursing, it will, however, I
think, be necessary to briefly glance at what a dog is required to do in a
oourse, and that for two reasons: First, because I hold that all dogs
should be judged in the show ring by their apparent suitability for their
special work ; and, seoondly, because this book may fall into the hands of
many who are real lovers of the dog and genuine sportsmen at heart, but
who, from various circumstances, have never had an opportunity of
seeing a oourse, or that so rarely as to be practically unacquainted
with its merits.

The remarks of the inexperienced on a course are often amusing. The
most oommon mistake made by the tyro is that the dog that kills the
hare always wins, irrespective of other considerations—a most excusable
error on the part of the novice, as in most or all other descriptions of
raoing the first at the post or objeot is the winner ; but in coursing it is
not which is first there, but which has done most towards accomplishing
the death of the hare or put her to the greatest straits to escape. Be it
here understood that the object of the courser and the object of the dogs
differ materially. The dog’s objeot is the death of the hare; the
oonrser’s objeot is to test the relative speed, working abilities, and

c﻿i8

British Dogs.

endurance of the competitors, as shown in their endeavours to accomplish
their object; and the possession of the hare is of little consequence,
except to the pothunter or currant jelly devotee, who is quite out of the
pale of genuine coursing society.

Although what I am going to say will be as stale and tiresome to—and
as likely to create a smile in—many as listening to a child’s first lesson
in the alphabet, I consider it, for the reasons already given, necessary.
Two dogs only are slipped at a hare, and this has always been the
honourable practice in this country. Even in Turberville’s Observations on
Coursing we find the maxim—“ If the greyhounds be but yonge or slow
you may course with a lease at one hare, but that is seldom seen, and a
brase of dogges is ynow for such a poore beaste.”

The hare being found, or so-ho’d, and given law—a fair start of eighty
or a hundred yards—the dogs are slipped, in the run up, as in after
stretches following a turn, the relative speed of the dogs is seen ; but
the hare, being pressed, will jerk, turn, and wind in the most nimble
manner, testing the dogs’ smartness in working, suppleness, and agility
in making quick turns, and “it is a gallant sport to see how the hare
will turn and wind to save herself out of the dogge’s mouth, so that
sometimes, when yon think that your greyhound doth, as it were, gape to
take her, she will turn and cast them a good way behinde her, and so save
herself by turning, wrenching, and winding.” It is by the practice of
these clever wiles and shifts that the hare endeavours to reach her covert,
and in closely following her scut and o’ermastering her in her own devices
that a greyhound displays the mastery of this branch of his business, in
which particular a slower dog will often excel an opponent that has the
foot of him in the stretches ; but, with this working power, a facility in
making short turns, speed must be combined, or it stands to reason points
could not be made except on a comparatively weak hare. It is, therefore,
important that the conformation of the dog should be such as to combine
speed with a strength and suppleness that will, as far as possible, enable
him to control and guide the velocity with which he is moviDg, as his
quick eye sees the game swerve or turn to one side or another.

As the death of the hare when it is a kill of merit—that is, when
accomplished by superior speed and cleverness, and not by the accident
of the foremost dog turning the hare, as it were, into the killer’s mouth
—is a consideration in reckoning up the total of good points mrfde, it is﻿The Greyhound.

19

important that the dog should be formed to do this, picking up and
bearing the hare in his stride, and not stopping to worry her as a terrier
would a rat; and here many points come in which should be narrowly
scanned and compared in the show ring, but too seldom are not, and
these I will allude to in going over the several points.

In addition, there are other requirements for which the dog must
possess qualities, to make him successful in the held and give him a
right to a prize in the show ring, and which will be noticed in detail. A
good idea of a course, with the gallant efforts of pursuer and pursued, is
given in the following lines from Ovid, translated by Golding :

As when the impatient greyhound, slipped from far,

Bounds o'er the glade to course the fearful hare.

She in her speed does all her safety lie.

And he with double speed pursues his prey,

O’erruns her at the sitting turn; but licks
His chaps in vain; yet blows upon the flix.

She seeks the shelter which the neighbouring covert gives
And, gaining it, she doubts if yet she lives.

In forming an opinion of a dog, whether in selecting him for some
special purpose of work or merely choosing the best out of a lot in the
prize ring, first impressions are occasionally deceptive, get confirmed into
prejudices, and mislead the judgment. But, in the great majority of
cases, to the man who knows what he is looking at, what he is lookmg
for, and what he has a reasonable right to expect, the first impression
conveyed to the mind by the general outline or contour, and the way it is
filled in, will be confirmed on a close critical and analytical examination
of the animal point by point; and it is only by such close and minute
examination that a judge can become thoroughly master of his subject,
and arrive at a position where he can give strong, clear, and intelligible
reasons for the opinions he has formed and the decision he has given.
Moreover, there is that to be weighed and taken into account in the final
judgment on the dog’s merits which is referable to no part alone, which
can only be appreciated on taking him as a whole, that is, life—that
indefinable something which evades the dissector’s knife, yet permeates
the whole body, the centre power which is the souroe of movement in
every quivering muscle, and is variously seen in every action of the dog
and in every changing emotion of whioh he is capable. This, I conceive
to be the only difficulty in the way of judging by points, and it is not

C 2﻿20

British Dogs.

insuperable : this is probably what is often meant by condition and
quality.

The judge must, however, as already said, consider, and, if need be,
describe, not only the general appearance of the animal and the impression
he conveys to his (the judge’s) mind, but, as it were, take him to pieces,
assessing the value of each particular part according to its fitness for
the performance of the special function for which it is designed, and
under the peculiar conditions in which it will have to act; and, having
done so, he will find his first opinion confirmed precisely in the ratio of
his fitness to judge.

Before taking the points of the greyhound one by one, I must give
the description of a greyhound, as laid down in the doggrel rhymes of
the illustrious authoress of “The Book of St. Alban’s,” Dame Juliana
Berners or Barnes, somewhile Abbess of Sopewell, and since described as
“ a second Minerva in her studies and another Diana in her diversions.”
It would be sheer heresy to write of greyhounds without introducing her
description, so universally has this been done ; I therefore give it in full,
which I have never seen done by any of our modern authorities. In
doing so, I must confess there are two lines that to me are somewhat
obscure. I, however, venture to suggest that in his eighth year he is
only a lick ladle—fit to lick a trencher, and in his ninth year cart and
saddle may be used to tak^him to the tanner.

The Properties or a Good Grehounde.

A grehound shold be heeded lyke a snake
And neckyd lyke a drake,

Footed lyke a catte,

Tayllyd lyke a ratte,

Byded lyke a teme,

And chynyd lyke a beme.

The fjTst yere he must leme to fede.

The second yere to felde nim Jede,

The thyrde yere he is felowe lyke.

The fourth yere there is none syke.

The fyfth yeare he is good enough,

The Byxte yere he shall hold the plough,

The seventh yere he woll avaylle
Grete bytches for to assay lie.

The eygthe yere licke ladyll.

The nynthe yere cartsadyll;

And when he is comyn to thut yere
Have him to the tannere,

For the best hounde that ever bytehe had
At nynthe yere he is full badde.

To begin the detailed description with the head—which includes jaws﻿The Greyhound.

21

teeth, eyes, ears, and brain development—first, the general form must
be considered. It mnst be quite evident that ‘ ‘ headed like a snake ’ ’
cannot mean “like a snake’s head,” which is short, flat, and blunt, or
truncated. I understand the Abbess to use the snake itself, not its head
only, as a simile of the length and thinness of the greyhound’s head.

Arrian says : “Tour greyhounds should have light and well-articulated
heads, whether hooked or flat-nosed is not of much consequence, nor does
it greatly matter whether the parts beneath the forehead be protuberant
with muscle. They are alone bad which are heavy-headed, having thick
nostrils, with a blunt instead of a pointed termination.” Edmund de
Langley, in his “ Mayster of Game,” says, “ The greihound should have
a long hede and somedele grete, ymakyd in the manner of a luce ; a good
large mouth and good sessours, the one again the other, so that the
nether jaws passe not them above, ne that thei above passe not him by
neither;” and coming down to “ Gervase Markham,” in the sixteenth
century, we have his description: “ He should have a fine long leane
head, with a sharp nose, rush grown from the eyes downward.”

The general form and character of the head is here pretty fairly
sketched, and we see a very close agreement between these old authori-
ties. It appears to me that the “Mayster of Game” was the most
happy in his illustration, “ made in the manner of a luce,” that is, a full-
grown pike, as the head of the greyhound and pike will bear a fair com-
parison without straining ; and who can say it was not the exigencies of
rhyme that compelled our sporting Abbess to set up for us that stumbling
block, the head of the snake. No doubt Bhe thought of the excellent
illustration the neck of the drake offered her, and had to find a rhyme to
it, but she might with as great propriety have written :

The grehound should he headed like a luce

And neckyd like a goose.

The foroe of illustration lost in the second line is more than compen-
sated by the strength of the first. Markham is right in desiring a “ long
lean head,” but even that may be oarried to a fault; but we do not want
the “ part beneath the forehead protuberant of musole; ” and the “ heavy
headed, with thick nostrils and a blunt nose,” I must, with Arrian,
discard altogether as thoroughly bad, too slow, and certain to be “too
clever by half.” Looking at the whole head, we see, by the sloping-in of﻿22

British Dogs.

the side walls of the skull how the brain capacity is diminished, and how
the elongation and narrowing of head and jaws have almost obliterated the
olfactory organs, the internal cavities becoming contracted and presenting
so much less surfare that the scenting powers are necessarily limited,
although it is a mistake to suppose that they are entirely lost. This is
just what we want in the greyhound ; he must run by sight, never using
his nose; he must have the brain developed where it shows courage,
not intelligence. When a retriever has to puzzle out a lost bird, his
nose and his intelligence are both put to the test, and the higher the
development, the better the dog, and as we find the intellectual faculties
highest in those dogs with most brain before the ears, so we select our
retrievers thus formed ; but as this would be a disadvantage in the grey-
hound, which we want to run honest and fair, such as Justice Shallow,
in the “Merry Wives of Windsor,” describes—

He is a good dog and a fair dog;

Can there be more said—be is good and fair—

we select them without this intellectual development, by use of which
they would soon study the wiles and shifts of “ poor Wat,” and, to save
their wind and legs, “ run cunning ”—that is, do a “ waiting race,” the
cunning dog allowing his fellow to do the work, whilst he hangs back for
the hare to be turned into his mouth. A greyhound should measure well
round the head, across and at back of ears, which is a sure indication of
the courage that gives dash and persistence to their efforts.

By “ hooked nose,” I presume Arrian to mean that the upper jaw
protrudes; but that would decidedly be a fault, as a dog so formed
would be at a disadvantage in holding and killing his hare. This forma-
tion, called overshot, or pig-jawed, is often met with in various breeds of
dogs, but if at all excessive it is most objectionable. The opposite to
that is sometimes seen, and we have them undershot; but such cases are
comparatively rare, and owe their origin to the cross with the bulldog,
which has been resorted to to give stamina, courage, and staunchness to
the greyhound; but the form to be desired is the level mouth with the
“ good sessours one again the other.”

The teeth themselves are important; they should be large, strong, and
white, the fangs sharp and powerful; this is not only necessary for their
work, but it is always a sign of health.

“The eye,” Arrian says, “should be large, upraised, clear, and﻿The Greyhound.

23

strikingly bright. The best look fiery and flash like lightning, resembling
those of leopards, lions, or lynxes.” Markham says, “a full clear eye,
with long eyelids. ’ ’ The latter pecularity I have never observed, probably
from want of a close attention to the point; but the clear, bright, and
fiery eye is always a necessity, although, of course, the condition of the
dog and the circumstances under which he is seen must be considered in
judging of it; the colour varies with that of the coat, as in all breeds.

Of the ears Arrian writes, “they should be large and soft, so as to
appear broken ; but it is no bad indication if they appear erect, provided
they are not small and stiff.” This description would not be accepted as
satisfactory now ; ears are preferred small, and free from all coarseness ;
neither does Markham’s “a sharp ear, short, and close-falling,” quite
oonvey the modern idea of a greyhound’s ear; it should be soft, fine in
leather, and folded with the shoulder of the ear, strong enough to carry
the whole up when the dog is excited or his attention fixed.

The neck is the next point, and it is one of very great importance ; it
must belong, strong, well clothed with muscle; yet withal light, airy, and
possessing wonderful flexibility and suppleness. Arrian says, “ The neck
should be long, round, and flexible, so that if you forcibly draw the dogs
backwards by their collars it may seem to be broken, from its flexibility
and softness.” The neck is certainly wonderfully pliant, and readily
bent to either Bide at will. Our royal writer says, “ The neck should be
grete and longe, and bowed as a swanne’s neck;” Markham, “a long
neck, a little bending, with a loose hanging wezand.” The last point is
not correct, and might convey the idea that there was a looseness of skin
underneath; the windpipe, although easily felt, does not hang loose,
the whole neok being neat, round, clean made, and elegantly oarried. A
long neck, as well as long head, are necessary to enable the dog to pick
up, oarry, or bear the hare without stopping, which he will do, throwing
his head up with the hare in his mouth; but a dog with a short neck
would have to stoop so in catching his hare that there would be every
chance of his coming a “cropper,” the force at which he was going
throwing him heels over head.

Continuing from the neck we have the broad, square, beam-like back
of good length and great strength; without this the dog could not endure
the exhaustive process of the “pumpers” he is submitted to. The
ohest, too, must be deep and fairly wide. Arrian says, “ Broad chests﻿24

British Dogs.

are better than narrow ; shoulders wide apart, not tied together, but as
loose and free as possible ; legs round, straight, and well jointed ; sides
strong ; loins broad, firm, not fleshy, but sinewy ; upper flanks looBe and
supple ; hips wide asunder; lower flanks hollow; tail long, fine, and
supple; haunches sweeping and fine to the touch.” In respeot to the
chest, it is needless to say how all-important it is that it should be
capacious, but we must get capacity from the depth and squareness, not
from the bulged-out barrel form, which would produce slow movement
and a heavy fronted dog that would soon tire. Take Markham’s
description in “ The Country Farm “A long, broad, and square beam,
back, with high round fillets ; he must be deep, swine sided, with hollow
bended ribs and a full brest.”

“The Mayster of Game” gives an excellent description: “Her
shuldres as a roebuck ; the for leggs streght and grete ynow, and nought
to hind legges ; the feet straught and round as a catte, and great cleas;
the boones and the joyntes of the cheyne grete and hard as the chyne
of an hert; the thighs great and squarred as an hare ; the houghs
streight, and not crompyng as of an oxe.” The shoulders should be set
on as obliquely as possible, to enable the dog to throw his fore legs well
forward in his gallop, the shoulder blades sloping in towards each other
as they rise, they should be well clothed with muscle, but not fleshy and
coarse, so as to look loaded ; the shoulders should not be tied together
but have plenty of freedom—this with the strong muscles of the loin
enable the dog to turn fast and cleverly; the elbows must be neither
turned out nor in; the bone of the leg strong ; there must be good
length of arm ; and the leg below the knee must be short and very
strong, and the foot round and cat-like ; well sprung knuckles, a firm
hard, thick sole, and large strong nails are also essential.

The beam-like back is to give the necessary strength ; the deep chest
is needed with sufficient width to give plenty of room for the lungs and
heart to freely perform their functions; width is needed that the
necessary room may be got without making the chest so deep as to be in
the way and catch against stones, tussocks, and lumps of turf on rough
coarse ground, when the dog is fully stretched in the gallop; the oblique
shoulders enable the dog to throw his legs well forward and close to-
gether, thus enabling him to cover a lot of ground at each stride, and
also, in connection with his long and supple neck, to throw himself﻿The Greyhound.

25

through an astonishingly small mouse. The necessity of sufficient bone,
big, Btrong joints, and muscular legs, is apparent where such violent
exertion iB called for, and the round, cat-like foot, is a necessity of speed.
No one would have the wheels of a fast-going gig made as broad
in the tyre as that of a four-ton waggon. The soles are required hard
and tough, that they may stand the wear and tear of rough ground and
stony lanes, if these come in the way; the strong claws give the dog
purchase over the ground.

The loins must be strong ; a greyhound weak there might be fast for a
spurt, but would prove merely flashy, being neither able to endure nor
yet good at his turns. When Markham says “ short and strong fillets,”
he means the loin—the term being used in speaking of the horse—not the
fleshy part of the thigh, which the term might apply to. The hips must
be wide asunder, and the hind legs straight as regards each other, “ not
crompying as an oxe ”—that is, as we now express it, not cow-hocked—
but they must be bent or sickle hocked; the thighs with immense and
well developed muscle, the same strength of bony and muscular develop-
ment is needed as in the fore legs, and especially there should be no weak-
ness below the knee. The dog should stand rather wide behind and higher
than before; the slight width gives additional propelling force, and the
higher hind quarters additional speed and power in racing up hill, as
hares invariably do if they can, unless there is temptation of a covert
near, a fact quaintly expressed in the “ Book of St. Albans ” :

“ Tell me,” Maystre, quod the man, “ what is the skyll
'Why the Haare wolde so fayne renne againBt the hill?”

Quod the Mayster, “ For her legges be shorter before
Than behind; that is the skyll thore.”

In respect to the tail, all agree it should be long and fine. Markham
says : “ An even growne long rat’s tail, round, turning at the lower end
leashward, and full set on between the buttocks.” The “ Mayster of
Game ” says : “ A catte’s tayle, making a ring at eend, but not to hie.”
The tail, no doubt, acts as a rudder, and as such must play an important
part in swerving and turning.

Colour in greyhounds should go for little, but many have a prejudice in
favour of a special faucy, although experience proves that there are good
of all. In the hunting poem by “Gratius,” as translated by Wase, we
are told to

Chnse the greyhound pied with black and white,

He runs more swift than thought or winged flight.﻿26

British Dogs.

Many coursers prefer the pure black or the red ; hut a short list, taken
from the “ Coursing Calendar,” will show good greyhounds of many
different colours : Scotland Tet and her sons, Canaradzo and Calioja, were
white ; Cerito, fawn and white ; Lobelia, brindled and white ; Lady Stor-
mont, black and white; Master M'Grath, black and white ; Beaoon, Blue
Light, and Sapphire, all blue ; High Idea, blue ticked ; Bed of Stone, Bab
at the Bowster, and Sea Cove, red; Cauld Kail, red ticked; Mocking
Bird, Cashier, Black Knight, all black; Landgravine and Elsecar,
brindled.

The medium sized dog is by most preferred, and there is a considerable
difference both in height and weight between the dog and bitch.

The dog selected for illustration is strongly typical of the Sootch style
of greyhound, but without the coarseness which usually belongs to the
scions of the north-country breeds. He was a reddish fawn, with splendid
back and loin, good shoulders, and muscular quarters, with good legs and
feet, and altogether a thoroughly well-shaped dog. He was the property
of J. H. Salter, Esq., Tolleshunt D’Arcy, Kelvedon, Essex, but is now
dead. The following is his pedigree and performances :

Is

R |3

? "d'

5II

fc SR
p ©

Wee Avon	Sea Girl
	Canaradzo
	Tamar
Ingleton	Ewesdale

Seacomb

Seaflower (Spinks’s)
Beacon
Scotland Tet
Judge

Flora Macdonald

Larriston

Meg

Hermit

Fly

Blue

Froli

Light

o

Wigan

Veto

John Bull
Fudge

| Lauderdale
I Hannah

Bonnie Prince Charlie
Fanny

Ban first at ArdroBsan, February, 1870, winning Sapling Stake.

Ban at Scottish National, September, 1870, dividing St. Leger (61 dogs) with kennel
companion.

Ban at Bcottish National, March, 1871, dividing Biggar Stakes (61 dogs) with kennel
companion﻿The Greyhound.

27

Ran at Scottish National, September, 1871; won two courses in Douglas Cup (20 dogs).

Ban at Lurgan. October, 1871; won two courses in Brownlow Cup (64 dogs), beating
Pretender and Smuggler, beaten by Cataclysm.

Ban at Border Union, November, 1871; won three courses Netherby Cup (64 dogs):
beaten, when lame, by Crown Jewel.

Ban at Brigg, January, 1872. Ban second for Eisham Cup (32 dogs); beaten by
Leuoatheia, when hurt.

Ban at Waterloo, February, 1872; won two courses in Waterloo (64 dogs), beating
Chameleon; put out by Magenta.

Ban at Scottish National, March, 1872; divided Biggar Stakes (64 dogs) with kennel
companion Avonside.

Glenavon thus divided three 64-dog stakes in two seasons, ran second
for a 32, Ac. He never ran except at a first-class meeting, and rarely
was entered for anything under a 64-dog stake. He was perfectly honest
to the end of his career, always going fast and running stoutly. His
olevemess was never questioned.

In judging the dog from the engraving, it must be remembered that he
is not shown in running condition.

The following measurements of good dogs may be taken as a fair
average:

Mr. J. L. Bensted’s greyhound Chimney Sweep : Age, 5 years; weight,
661b.; height at shoulder, 26£in.; length from nose to set on of tail,
42Jin.; length of tail, 19in.; girth of chest, 29fin.; girth of loin, 21in.;
girth of head, 15in.; girth of forearm, 6 Jin.; length of head from occiput
to tip of nose, lO^in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 8Jin. We have measured him in working condition. Chimney
Sweep won the gold medal in his class at the Paris International Dog
Show, 1878.—Mr. J. H. Salter’s greyhound dog Snapdragon: Age,
8 years ; weight, 721b.; height at shoulder, 27in.; length from nose to
set on of tail, 41in. ; length of tail, 19in.; girth of chest, 31£in.; girth
of loin, 22in.; girth of head, 15in.; girth of forearm, 7in.; length of
head from occiput to tip of nose, 10£in.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes' and tip of nose, 7fin.—Mr. J. H. Salter’s greyhound bitch
Satanella: Age, 5 years; weight, 57£lb.; height at shoulder, 24£in.;
length from nose to set on of tail, 41£in. ; length of tail, 18£in. ; girth
of ohest, 30£in. ; girth of loin, 21in.; girth of head, 14£in. ; girth of
forearm, 6£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9in.; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8in.﻿28

British Dogs.

Chapter II.—THE SCOTCH DEERHOUND.

By Senex.

This article has been specially contributed to this volume by a gentle-
man who has chosen to veil his identity under the nom de plume of
“Senex.” He is a popular judge, and one whose extended experience
and observation of exhibition dogs, as well as that of a breeder, and as one
who has had the advantage of working deerhounds on their proper quarry
in their native glens, lends great value and weighty authority to his
opinions. He says :

“ The rough Scotch greyhound is, perhaps, as old a breed as any extant,
not excepting the fabulous pedigrees we read of in the mastiffs ; but
whether their lineage traces back from the time that Noah made his exit
from the ark or is of more recent origin it matters little. Few will deny
that it is a most striking and picturesque breed of dogs. As an
ardent admirer of the true breed, and having kept them some five-and-
thirty years or more, perhaps a few lines from me will not. come amiss to
instruct the inexperienced what kind they are to try to obtam. The
deerhound of the present day is very difficult to get quite pure, so many
crosses have been resorted to. Some have tried the foxhound, others the
bulldogs, and then again the colley.

“The deerhound stands from 28in. to 30in. or 31in. high; lately, I
believe, one has been exhibited 33in., but then what use is Buch a hound ?
His immense size, to the tyro, may be taking on the bench, but let him
only consider what he is wanted for, viz., to hunt and pull down the
stag. Can a lumbering, overgrown animal (for such a hound of the size
would be) gallop over all kinds of ground at a rapid pace g,nd be aotive
likewise ? No. For real work choose a hound about 28in. or 29in.,
not more.

‘ ‘ The deerhound resembles in form the common greyhound, only his
build is more massive. His head should be long, and broad between
the ears, the jaws very powerful, and the teeth strong, white, and
regular ; the hair on the sides of the lips forms a sort of moustache.
Whenever one is seen with a narrow skull be assured at some time
or other Persian or Russian cross has been resorted to ; this is apparent﻿﻿﻿The Scotch Deerhound.

29

in many of the speoimens one sees on the show benches at the present
day. The ear should be small, set on very high, and at the back of the
skull more like the rat’s, and when at rest the daps should be turned a
little outwards, so that one sees inside the ear; this I have always noticed in
the best bred ones. Avoid a large ear, it is an abomination, and look for
a black fringe on the tips of the ears ; it is seen in the best specimens. The
neck should be moderately long, and very muscular, and the shoulders broad
and deep and obliquely set; this is of great importance, as anyone must
understand that a dog with an upright shoulder cannot have any pace ;
the fore legs should be straight, with plenty of bone, and well set on the
feet, which should not be spreading, but the toes well held together. In
an old rhyme on greyhounds one line is, “a back like a beam,” which
holds equally good with the deerhound, for without strength in this
department it is impossible to maintain a high speed long, and a deer-
hound is required to have speed, endurance, and strength; where the
loins are weak the animal is useless for the purpose the breed denotes ;
the loins, then, cannot be too strong, which applies to the hind quarters
likewise, as they are the chief element of progression. Strong stifle joints
and hocks, with great length between them, and from the stifle to the hip,
in conjunction with a short leg, is to my mind the iewu ideal of hind
quarters.

“ A few words may be said not inaptly about coat, as now-a-days one
sees so many types even in animals of the same parentage. The Scotch
deerhound, unadulterated, has a strong wiry coat, not silken, or any ap-
proach of it. Perhaps one of the finest specimens of the breed that has
been for years for symmetry is W. Hickman, Esq.’s, Morni, but then he
failed in ooat, which was very soft, and that is seen likewise in some
to the descendants from his sister Brenda, who has thrown a number
of winners; and I oannot help fancying, without any disrespect to
the good dogs, that within this last ten or twelve years a little
foreign blood has been infused. I should always doubt the purity of
a deerhound with a head narrow betweon the ears, or which may have
a fine Bilky coat. Well can I recollect my first, a black grizzle, with a
strong wiry coat, and all the good ones I have seen imported from the
Land of Cakes had the same texture hair, strong and wiry. I am fully
convinced if the advocates of the soft-haired deerhounds would only try
their hounds against the hard-ooated ones in Scotland, standing on the﻿30

British Dogs.

side of some exposed place and during a driving mist, they would then
candidly confess that the wiry had the day.

“ I have stated that 28in. was a good size for a deerhound—
by that I meant for work; for the show bench an inch or so higher
might do, but avoid too much in that quarter, as then, in the majority
of cases, a weak loin is the result. Thanks to the kindness of a friend,
who, I believe, took the measurements at Birmingham show, 1873, I am
enabled to give the measurements, &c., of many of the most famous dogs
and bitches of the present day.

	Height.  in.  	 26J			Girth.  in.  281 			Loin.  in.  201
Hilda			 27			29	23
		 27				231
		 28 		291			22
		 261 		301			22
		 27			301			...	231
Morni			34'			26*

“ There were seven dogs over 30in., whereas the second prize dog was
only 26in.

‘ ‘ Somerset, who since that time has made his mark in the show yard,
measures : Height, 29|in. ; girth, 35in.; loin, 26£in.; and length, 5ft. 9in.

‘ ‘ The above are the only measures I have been able to obtain ; but are
sufficient to show that, as a rule, it is not an overgrown hound that the
young exhibitor has to look to to obtain honours. Search for an active
dog, with good legs, strong loins and haunches, a nice sloping shoulder,
and a hard coat, and such a one will take a deal of beating.”

It is but fair to state that in a letter on the above article the owner of
Morni, whilst admitting that his dog has not a hard coat, accounts for it
by the fact that, being a favourite, he was allowed to sleep in warm rooms
on soft carpets and was also periodically washed. This undoubtedly
tends to soften the coat in all dogs. He further quoted McNiel, of
Colonsay, to show that there are pure deerhounds with coats of a soft
texture, but all sportsmen',will agree with “ Senex ” that the harsh hard coat
is the most useful one. “ Senex ” has not referred to colour, so we, with
his approval, add that this varies from red wheaten to dark and many
shades of grizzle.

The measurements given by “ Senex ’ ’ we are now enabled to supplement:﻿The Scotch Deerhound.

3i

Mr. J. W. Hickman’s Morwi: Weight, 1001b.; height at shoulder,
30iin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 55in.; length of tail, 25in;
girth of chest, 34in.; girth of loin, 27£in. ; girth of head, 17£in.; length
of head from occiput to tip of nose, 11 £in.

Mr. H. Chaworth-Muster’s Old Torunn : Weight, 1201b.; height at
shoulder, 31in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 53in.; length of tail,
23in. ; girth of chest, 35£in.; girth of loin, 26£in. ; girth of head, 18in.;
girth of forearm, 10£in ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
12£in.; girth of thigh, 18£in.

Mr. J. Harris’ Yowng Torunn : Height at shoulder, 31in.; length from
nose to set on of tail, 53in.; length of tail, 26in. ; girth of chest, 33£in.;
girth of loin, 24in.; girth of head, 17£in. ; girth of forearm, 9in.; length
of head from occiput to tip of nose, 12£in.; girth of thigh, 18in.

Prince Albert Solms’ Duchess; Age, 2 years and 9 months; weight,
7l£lb.; height at shoulder, 27in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 46in.;
length of tail, 22in. ; girth of chest, 29iin. ; girth of loin, 21£in.; girth
of head, 16in.; girth of forearm, 12in.; length of head from occiput
to tip of nose, llin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 8in.

Prince Albert Solms’ Morven: Age, 2 years and 9 months; weight,
79£lb. ; height at shoulder, 28Jin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 46in.;
length of tail, 23in. ; girth of chest, 31£in. ; girth of loin, 23iu.; girth
of head, 16iin. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, ll^in.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8£in.

Dr. Haddon’B Lufra : Age, 4 years; weight, 7l£lb. ; height at shoulder,
27|in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 46in.; length of tail, 20£in. ;
girth of chest, 30in.; girth of loin, 20in.; girth of head, 15£in.; girth
of forearm just below elbow when standing, 7£in. ; length of head from
occiput to tip of nose, 10£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 8iin. ; colour, slate grey.

Dr. Haddon’B Maida; Age, 20 months; weight, 641b.; height at
shoulder, 27fin. ; length from nose to Bet on of tail, 47in.; length of
tail, 21in.; girth of chest, 29in.; girth of loin, 20in. ; girth of head,
16in.; girth of forearm just below elbow when standing, 7£in ; length of
head from oociput to tip of nose, llin.; girth of muzzle midway be-
tween eyeB and tip of nose, 8$in. ; colour, slate grey.

Dr. Haddon’s Boy : Age, 20 months ; weight, 841b. fasting; height at﻿32

British Dogs.

shoulder, 294in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 49in. ; length of
tail, 22%m. ; girth of chest, 32^in.; girth of loin, 24in. ; girth of head,
16in.; girth of forearm just below elbow when standing, 8in. ; length
of head from occiput to tip of nose, llin.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 9in. ; colour, light brindle.

Dr. Alexander’s Brcm: Age, 6 years ; weight, 821b. ; height at
shoulder, 28in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 47in. ; length of
tail, 19in.; girth of chest, 33in. ; girth of loin, 25in. ; girth of head,
17in.; girth of forearm, 8£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, ll^in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8in.

Chapter III.—THE IRISH WOLFHOUND.

By Capt. G. A. Graham.

To do full justice to this subject is almost impossible, owing to the faot
that there has been a generally received impression amongst modem
writers that this noble breed of dog is entirely extinct! That the breed
in its “ original integrity ” has apparently disappeared cannot be
disputed, yet there can be little doubt that so much of the true breed is
forthcoming, both in the race still known in Ireland as the “ Irish wolf-
hound ” (to be met with, however, in one or two places only), and in our
modern deerhound, as to allow of the complete recovery of the breed in its
pristine grandeur, with proper management, in judicious hands. It is a
fact well known to all modern mastiff breeders who have thoroughly
studied the history of their breed that, until within the last thirty or forty
years, mastiffs, as a pure race, had almost become extinct. Active
measures were taken by various spirited individuals, which resulted in the
complete recovery of the breed, in a form at least equal, if not superior, to
what it was of yore.

Why should not, then, such measures be taken to recover the more
ancient, and certainly equally noble, race of Irish wolfhounds ? It may be
argued that, the services of such a dog no longer being required for sport,﻿﻿[Froi﻿The Irish Wolfhound.

33

his existence is no longer to be desired; but snob an argument is not
worthy of consideration for a moment, for bow many thousands of dogs
are bred for which no work is provided, nor is any expected of them,
added to which, the breed would be admirably suited to the requirements
of our colonies. One after another the various breeds of dogs which had
of late years more or less degenerated, as, for instance, mastiffs, fox
terriers, pugs, St. Bernards, colleys, have become “the rage,” and, in
consequence, a vast improvement is observable in the numerous specimens
Bhown from time to time. Let us, then, hope that steps may be taken to
restore to us such a magnificent animal as the Irish wolfhound.

That we have in the deerhound the modem' representative of the old
Irish dog is patent; of less stature, less robust, and of slimmer form, the
main characteristics of the original breed remain, and in very exceptional
instances specimens “ crop up ” that throw back to and resemble in a
marked manner the old stock from which they have sprung; for instance,
the dog well known at all the leading shows (now for some years lost to
Bight) as champion Torunn, beyond the facts that he required a somewhat
lighter ear and still more massive proportions, combined with greater
stature, he evidently approximated more nearly to his distant ancestors than
to his immediate ones. The matter of ear here alluded to is probably only a
requirement called for by modern and more refined tastes, as it is hardly
likely that any very high standard as to quality or looks was ever aimed
at or reached by our remote ancestors in any breed of dogs. Strength,
stature, and fleetness were the points most carefully cultivated — at
any rate, as regards those used in the pursuit and capture of large
and fierce game.

It is Bomewhat remarkable that, whilst we have accounts of almost all
the noticeable breeds, including the Irish wolfhound, there is no allusion
to any such dog as the deerhound, save in writings of a comparatively
recent date.

The article or essay on the Irish wolfhound, written by Richardson in
1842, is, it is supposed, the only one on this subject in existence; and
whilst it is evident to the reader that the subject haB been most ably
treated and thoroughly sifted by him, yet some [of his conclusions, if not
erroneous, are at least open to question. It is a matter of history that
this dog is of very ancient origin, and was well known to and highly
prized by the Romans, who frequently used him for their combats in the

D﻿34

British Dogs.

arena; and that he was retained in a certain degree of purity to within
a comparatively recent period, when, owing to the extinction of wolves,
and presumably to the indifference and oarelessness of owners, this most
superb and valuable breed of dog was unaccountably suffered to fall into
a very neglected and degenerate state.

Prom the general tenor of the accounts we heard of this dog’s dimensions
and appearance, it is to be gathered that he was of considerably greater
stature than any known race of dogs existing at present, and apparently
more than equal to the destruction of a wolf.

It is an incontestable fact that the domestic dog, when used for the
pursuit of ferocious animals, should be invariably larger, and apparently
more powerful, than his quarry, as the fierce nature, roving habits, and
food of the wild animal render him usually more than a match for his
domesticated enemy, if only of equal size and stature. We know that the
Russian wolfhounds, though equal in stature to the wolf, will not attaok
him single-handed; and wisely, for they would certainly be worsted in the
combat.

The Irish wolfhound, being used for both the capture and despatch of
the wolf, it would necessarily have been of greyhound conformation,
besides being of enormous power. When caught, a heavy dog such as a
mastiff would be equal to the destruction of the wolf, bnt to obtain a dog
with greyhound speed and the strength of the mastiff, it would stand to
reason that his stature should considerably exceed that of the mastiff—one
of our tallest as well as most powerful breeds. The usual height of the
mastiff does not exceed 30in.; and, arguing as above, we may reasonably
conclude that, to obtain the requisite combination of speed and power, a
height of at least 33in. wonld have been reached. Many writers, however,
put his stature down as far exceeding that. Goldsmith states he stood
4ft.; Buffon states one sitting measured 5ft. in height; Bewick, that the
Irish wolfhound was about 3ft. in height; Richardson, arguing from the
measurements of the Bkulls of the Irish wolfhound preserved at the
present time in the Royal Irish Academy, pronounced it his opinion that
they must have stood 40in.

It is perfectly certain, from these and many other accounts, allusion to
which want of space renders impossible, that the dog was of vast size and
strength, and all agree in stating that, whilst his power was that of the
mastiff, his form was that of the greyhound. The “ Sportsman’s﻿The Irish Wolfhound.

35

Cabinet,” a very valuable old book on doge, published in 1803, which is
illustrated withjvery good engravings after drawings from life by Benaigle,
B. A., says, “ The dogs of Greece, Denmark, Tartary, and Ireland, are the
largest and strongest of their species. The Irish greyhound is of very
ancient race, and still to be found in some few remote parts of the king-
dom, but they are said to be much reduced in size even in their original
climate; they are much larger than the mastiff, and exceedingly ferocious
when engaged.” A very good and spirited drawing of this dog is given,
which almost entirely coincides with the writer’s conclusion as to what
the Irish wolfhound was and should be, though a rougher coat and some-
what more lengthy frame are desirable. The dogs described in ‘ ‘ Ossian ’ ’
are evidently identical with the Irish wolfhound, being of much greater
stature and power than the present deerhound. From these descriptions,
and those given elsewhere, we may conclude that, in addition to the dog’s
being of great stature, strength, and speed, he was also clothed in rough
hair. In support of this, we find that in the present day all the larger
breeds of greyhound are invariably rough or long as to coat.

Many writers have incorrectly confounded the Irish wolfhound with the
Great Dane, though the two dogs vary entirely in appearance, if not po
much in build. It seems more than probable, however, that the two
breeds were frequently crossed, which may aocount for these statements.
The late Marquis of Sligo possessed some of this breed, which he was in
the habit (erroneously) of considering Irish wolfhounds.

Eiohardson was at very great trouble to get every information as to the
probable height of this dog, but the conclusions arrived at by him
(ohiefly based on the lengths of the skulls measured by him) would seem
to be decidedly wrong, for the following reasons : He states ‘ ‘ the skull is
llin. in the bone ; ” to that he adds 3in. for nose, skin, and hair, thus
getting 14in. as the length of the living animal’s head. The head of a
living deerhound, measured by him, is 10in., the dog standing 29in.; he
then calculates that the height of the Irish wolfhound would have been
40in., taking for his guide the fact that the 29in. dog’s head was lOin.
This would appear to be correot enough, but the allowance of 3in. for
extras is absurd. l£in. are an ample allowance for the extras, and if the
head is taken at 12£in. the height of the dog will be reduced to 36in.
Moreover, the measurement of lOin. for the head of a 29in. deerhound’s
head is manifestly insufficient, as the writer can testifiy from ample

d 2﻿36

British Dogs.

experience and frequent measurementa. A deerhound of that height
would have a head at least llin.; so, calculating on the same principles,
the Irish skulls would have been from dogs that only stood 33£in.
Richardson says that this skull is superior in size to the others, which
would prove that the average must have been under 33£in., and we may
safely conclude that the height of these dogs varied from 31in. to 34in.
In support of this view the writer would point to the German boarhound ;
this dog has retained his character from a very remote age, and as he is
still used for the capture of fierce and large animals, the breed is not
likely to have been allowed to degenerate. The height of this breed
varies from 28in. to 33in., the latter being probably the limit to which
any race of dogs has been known to arrive.

The writer has numerous extracts from various authors, and many en-
gravings from pictures by artists, dating from the middle of the sixteenth
century to the commencement of the present century; but want of space
will not allow of their being introduced, though of much interest. From
these sources it is gathered clearly that the dog was such as has been
above stated; and from these varied accounts the following detailed con-
clusions as to the appearance and dimensions of the breed are arrived at,
though perhaps they may not be considered as absolutely conclusive.

General Appeara/nce and Form.—That of a very tall, heavy, Scotch
deerhound ; much more massive and majestic looking ; active, and tole-
rably fast, but Bomewhat less so than the present breed of deerhound ; the
neck thick in comparison to his form, very muscular and rather long.

Shape of Head.—Very long, but not too narrow, coming to a compara-
tive point; nose not too small, and head gradually getting broader from
the same evenly up to the back of the skull; much broader between the
ears than that of the present deerhound.

Coat.—Rough and hard all over body, tail, and legs, and of good length ;
hair on head long, and rather softer than that on body; that under the
jaws to be long and wiry, also that over eyes.

Colour.—Black, grey, brindle, red, and fawn, though white and parti-
coloured dogs were common, and even preferred in olden times.

Shape and Size of Ears.—Small in proportion to size of head, and
half erect, resembling those of the best deerhounds; if the dog is of
light colour a dark ear is to be preferred.﻿The Irish Wolfhound.

37

Dogs.	Bitches.

Probable height at shoulder	... 82in. to 35in. ...	28in. to 30in.	
Girth of chest 		... 38	44	32	„	34
Bound forearm 		... 10 „ 12 ...	8	>.	91
Length of head 		... 124	14	101	.. Hi
Total length 		... 84	„ 100	70	„ 80
Weight in lbs		... 110	„ 140	90	» no

When Sir Walter Scott lost his celebrated dog Maida (whioh, by the
way, was by a Pyrenean dog out of a Glengarry deerhound bitch) he was
presented with a brace of dogs by Glengarry and Cluny Macpherson,
both of gigantic size. He calls them “ wolfhounds,” and says, “ There
is no occupation for them, as there is only one wolf near, and that is con-
fined in a menagerie. ’ ’ He was ofFered a fine Irish greyhound by Miss
Edgeworth, who owned some of this breed, but declined, having the
others. Richardson says, “ Though I have separated the Irish wolf dog
from the Highland deerhound and the Scottish greyhound, I have only
done so partly in conformity with general opinion, that I have yet to cor-
rect, and partly because these dogs, though originally identical, are now
unquestionably distinct in many particulars.”

As the rough Scotch greyhound is to the present deerhound, so is the
deerhound to what the Irish wolfhound was !

It may be of interest to mention here that the last wolf is said to have
been killed in 1710, but there is no accurate information as to the date.
The height of the European wolf varies from 28in. to 30in., and he is,
though of comparatively slight form, an animal of very gtfeat power and
aotivity.

Richardson, being an enthusiast on the subject, and not content with
simply writing, took measures to recover the breed. With muoh patience
and trouble he hunted up all the strains he could hear of, and bred dogs
of gigantic size, to which the strains now in existence can be distinctly
traced. A gentleman of position and means in Ireland, deceased some
six or eight years, possessed a kennel of these dogs, on the breeding of
which he expended both time and fortune freely. They were, though not
equal to the original dog, very fine animals. It has been ascertained be-
yond all question that there are a few specimens of the breed still in
Ireland and England that have well-founded pretensions to be considered
Irish wolfhounds, though falling far short of the requisite dimensions.

In conclusion, the writer would again earnestly urge that some
deoided action may be taken by gentlemen possessing both leisure and﻿38

British Dogs.

means to restore to ns that most noble of the canine raoe—the Irish
wolfhound.

Since the foregoing was written by Capt. Graham the subjeot of the
Irish wolfhound has been occasionally before the public both in this
country and in America, but no new and authenticated facts have, so
far as we are aware, been elicited in the discussion, and, unless we
accept statements unsupported by evidence, we are left in the position
that although there are dogs unquestionably possessing some of original
Irish wolfhound blood, none are known to exist of absolutely pure pedigree.

In March, 1878, a sketch of a supposed scion of this race appeared in
‘ ‘ The Country ’ ’ newspaper of New York, followed by a fair resume of his-
torical notices of the breed. A month following a letter appeared in the
same journal from Mr. Prank Adcock, of Shevington Hall, Wigan, in
which he says, “ It may interest your readers to know that this dog
(the Irish wolfhound) is still in existence and exhibits all the various at-
tributes ascribed to him by ancient writers. Those that I possess are
blackish grey and grizzled in colour, with stiff wiry coats. In shape they
resemble the great Scotch deerhonnd, but are somewhat more stoutly
made, and very much superior in size and courage, the head also, although
as long, is more massive and punishing in character, and the sense of
smell is marvellously acute.”

We, through the same medium, expressed our surprise at Mr. Adcook’s
statement that the pure breed existed and were in that gentleman’s pos-
session, knowing him to be an exhibitor of rare breeds, and yet that he
kept such an interesting fact from his countrymen, and had given them no
opportunity of seeing, even at a Kennel Club Show, one specimen of this
rarity, and suggested that he should substantiate a statement which had
astonished more than ourselves. Unfortunately, the American ‘ ‘ Country ’ ’
is now more extinct than the Irish wolfhound, but in its last issue appeared
a letter from Mr. Adcock, in response, we presume, to an editorial artiole on
the subject, in which occurs the following sentence : “It certainly seems
strange that the first intimation of it (the existence of the breed) should have
been published in onr columns, but we have no complaint to make on that
score, if Mr. Adcock will make his claim good by proving that he really
owns, as ho has stated, more than one of the original breed.” The
letter from Mr. Adcock,, however, is headed “Wolfhounds,” says a
good deal about Spain and the Pyrenees wolf dogs, and distinctly adds,﻿The Irish Wolfhound.

39

“ the wolfhounds I allude to are not to be confounded with these mongrels,
but are more or less identical with the dog known as the Irish grey-
hound or wolfhound.”

Feeling strongly interested in the recovery or resuscitation of the Irish
wolfhound, this controversy led us to make further enquiries respecting
the breed, but there are few indeed who appear to know much of it or
take any practical interest in it; and for the following notes referring to
the last known pure strains we are indebted to the writer of the foregoing
article, who possesses a more thorough knowledge of the breed and all
conoeming it, who has had more practical experience in breeding up to
standard of the true Irish wolfhound than any man living, and who has
in his dogs various combinations of, as far as we know, the only strains
that possess anthentic claims of descent from the original stock.

Captain Graham writes us: “With regard to the Caledon treed of
Irish wolfhounds, the present lord tells me that his father kept them,
and that he can just remember them in his extreme youth. He very
kindly made strict inquiries when on his Irish estates last year, and from
the older keepers and tenants he has gathered the following particulars,
which he filled in on a form containing a series of questions which I sent
him. The Irish wolfhounds kept by the late Earl of Caledon were as
tall as the largest deerhound now seen—if not taller—of a stouter make
throughout, broader and more massive ; the ears were similar to a deer-
hound’s ; rough, but not long coated ; fawn, grizzly, and dun in colour;
some old men have mentioned a mixture of white.

“ The late Earl of Derby had a similar breed, I am assured positively
by a gentleman (a clergyman) who had one given him many years ago—
over fifteen, probably twenty ; but from Knowsley direct I have not got
any information, though I wrote ; probably the old keepers who had
oharge of the menagerie have disappeared and knowledge of the dogs
has died out. A clergyman to whom one of my dogs was given some
nine or ten years ago told me that the present Lord Derby had seen this
dog, and considered him a finer dog than any he had formerly had. I
understand he grew to be very high—thirty-two inches—and massive in
proportion ; his sire was only thirty and a half inches, but his grandsire
was thirty-two, or considered to be so.

“ Biohardson, in his essay on this breed, says Sir Bichard Betham,
Ulster Bing at Arms, haB stated it as his conviotion that the Irish wolf﻿British Dogs.

40

dog was a gigantic greyhound, not smooth-Bkinned, like our greyhounds,
but rough and curly-haired. In the face of this, Sir William Betham’s
son, the well-known archer, wrote me some years ago to call my attention
to a specimen of the Irish wolfhound which was to be purchased in his
neighbourhood; his description of the dog, however, showed him to be
distinctly a boarhound or Great Dane, of no great size. A Mr. Mahony,
of Dromore—a large property near Muckross—had, about twenty years
ago, a breed of these dogs, but they have been allowed to die out. He
had them, however, from the late Sir J. Power, so that the same blood
is now in my possession. He described them fully to me as being
similar to the deerhound, but more massive and powerful, and not so
high on the leg.

“Two of these dogs, of the Power breed, were the property of a lady
living at Hyde, Isle of Wight, and of which I have photographs ; they
are however dead, and left no produce. I at great trouble traced out
the Mr. Carter who is referred to by Richardson, but only to find that
his breed of dogs had passed into oblivion.”

At the Irish Kennel Club Show, held at Dublin, April, 1879, a class
was made for dogs showing the nearest approach to the old Irish
wolfhound as described by sporting writers of the past, and the com-
mittee did us the honour of appointing us to judge. The class was
composed of dogs differing very widely in character, and what we
considered our duty was to select for honours the elements out of
which the old race could be rebuilt. We therefore gave first prize to
a dog of very distinct deerhound type, but enormous stature—a dog,
indeed, wanting nothing but more bone and substance to be our ideal of
an Irish wolfhound. These are great wants, no doubt, but in the class
brought together in this, the first public attempt to resuscitate the
breed—an attempt that redounds to the honour of the Irish Kennel
Club, and in a marked degree to Mr. St. George, who laboured hard in the
interest of the breed—the judge had to deal with elements and possibili-
ties only ; the actual has to come, and was not even looked for in this, the
first show of dogs under this name. The winning dog, Mr. Percy H.
Cooper’s Brian, is by Captain G. A. Graham’s Swanan—Dr. Lammond-
Hemming’s Linda. The latter is a well known deerhound bitch, while
Swanan, we believe, has as much of the genuine old Irish wolfhound blood
as any dog living; and it was with a view to forward the resuscitation﻿The Scotch Rough-haired Greyhound.

4i

of the Irish wolfhound that the litter, of which Brian is one and the
better-known Ingleside another, were bred.

The second prize was awarded to a puppy shown by Mr. Prank Adcock,
no pedigree given. He had a strong look of the great Dane, with a good
deal of the shape and style of the deerhound—dark, grizzled, and with a
hard useful coat, although rather short; he was a puppy of great power and
substance, the right stamp of head, although just a trifle too heavy, and
in a cross with a sister to this dog and such a dog as Brian, we should
expect to see the nearest approach in form to the old Irish wolfhound that
has existed in this century, and in them we should also expect to get
courage, a most essential attribute in a dog that has to cope with large
and fierce game, and without which, indeed, he is worthless.

The third prize was awarded to Capt. G. A. Graham’s Scot, a dog with
more authentic Irish wolfhound blood in him than anything shown, and,
in shape and style, correct, but wanting in coat, and, what is more im-
portant, size and substance, for he was Bmall almost to weediness.

The Irish Kennel Club give a challenge cup of .£15 15s. value, and I
hope this and the other means they are taking to encourage the restoration
of this noble breed will eventually prove successful. The demand for such
a dog for the hunting of fierce game in our colonies and abroad is
unlimited, and with that view alone Ireland Bhonld encourage the
restoration of the Irish wolfhound.

Chapter IV.—THE SCOTCH ROUGH-HAIRED
GREYHOUND.

By Corsincon.

This variety of dog is now rarely met with except on some show benches,
mixing with his larger brethren the deerhounds, and assuming their name.
The popularity and great increase of public coursing seem to have rung
his death knell, and, although he still exists in out-of-the-way places, he
has, to a very large extent, become absorbed in the more modern smooth-
skins, most strains "of which have more or less of the rough blood in﻿42

British Dogs.

their veins. It is now nearly thirty years since I last saw a rough grey-
hound competing in a coursing match, and he won it. When I say it was
in a parish where every one was a courser, and that can boast the
production of such good greyhounds as Cutty Sark, Scotland Yet, Wigan,
Canaradzo, &c., it will be a sufficient guarantee that good stuff was
pitted against the lanky dog with hirsute muzzle, whose name I forget,
and who, I well remember, had his life closed on the day of his victory
by some undiscovered scoundrel having that night cut his hock sinews,
when, of course, he had to be destroyed.

A celebrated public performer was Gilbertfield, a rough brindled dog
that flourished forty years ago ; but, although rough himself and the sire
of rough dogs that proved themselves good ones, his sire was of the
smooth variety.

The shape of the rough greyhound corresponds closely with that of the
deerhound ; but he is not so large and powerful, averaging about 26in. at
shoulder against 29in. or 30in. in the deerhound. That both sprang from
same original stock I think there can be no doubt; the existing difference
gradually became established by the work to which they were kept and the
selections in breeding that would naturally be resorted to to mould and
modify the animal to the purpose for which he was required.

In most points the rough—or, as it has been called, the wiry-haired—
greyhound corresponds with the smooth, except that he is larger boned,
not quite so elegant in shape, or perhaps, more correctly, wanting in that
beautiful finish that stamps the modern greyhound as the highest effort of
man’s skill in moulding this plastic animal to his will. The rough, harsh
coat adds to this effect, and the hairy jaws make the head look coarse ;
this, however, it is in reality, the head being wider between the ears,
which are also apt to be rather large and carried in an ugly manner.
From its general resemblance to the deerhound, many specimens have
been sold as such, and, being kept as companions and crossed with deer-
hounds, have swelled the ranks of the latter, and helped to deteriorate
their size.

I believe there are still to be met with in Wales specimens of the
rough greyhound; I have no personal knowledge of them, but, from
information furnished me, I believe they in all respects correspond with
the Scotch, and are no doubt descendants of the dogs that rid the
Principality of its wolves.﻿The Lurcher.

43

Chapter V.—THE LURCHER.

By Corsincon.

It would be in vain to look for the lurcher in the streets or parks of
London, in any of onr considerable towns, or at any of our dog shows.
In some of our manufacturing towns he is kept, but out of sight; his
appearance is so suggestive that the modesty and retiring disposition of
his master will not allow him to parade the dog before the public gaze.
The lurcher is, in fact, par excellence the poacher’s dog, and those who
deBire to see him must look for him in the rural districts ; there look
out for the jobbing labourer, the man who never works but from dire
necessity, a sturdily built but rather slouching fellow, whose very gait and
oarriage—half swagger, half lurch—proclaim the midnight prowler, and
olose to his heels, or crouched at his feet beneath the ale house bench,
you will find the lurcher.

The dog is by no means the ugly brute he is sometimes described to
be. True, they vary greatly, and the name more properly describes
the peculiar duties of the dog, and his manner of performing them, than
distinctiveness of type ; but'still the old-fashioned genuine lurcher has a
well-defined character of his ow n which no other dog can lay claim to.

The lurcher proper is a cross between the Scotch colley and the grey-
hound—an average one w ill stand about three-fourths the height of the
greyhound ; more strongly built and heavier boned, yet lithe and supple
withal, his whole conformation giving an impression of speed, just,
as his blinking, half-closed eye, as he lies pretending to sleep,
impresses one with his intelligence and cunning. His coat is rough,
hard, and uneven; his ears are coarse, and altogether there is
an air of, not rusticity, but vulgarity, about him. You cannot help
associating dog and master, and, to be just, you will admit that there
has been gross neglect or fundamental errors in the education and
bringing up of both dog and man, for which they may not be altogether
responsible ; and, to oonclude your philosophising, you may, with a sigh,
regret that so muoh capacity for real work Bhould be turned into a wrong
ohannel.

If we may compare the two in morals, the dog has much the better of﻿44

British Dogs.

it. He worships his master; he is as ready to defend as to adulate ;
his obedience is willing, prompt, and thorough, and rendered with a
silence that would command the praise of the Chelsea philosopher. No
yelp, youf, or yowl from the lurcher. Steady at heel or keeping watch
at the stile till the wire is in the meuse and the net across the gate ; then
a motion of the hand, and, without a whimper, he is round the field,
driving rabbit and hare into the fatal snare.

I attribute the wonderful intelligence displayed by some lurchers I
have known to their constant and most intimate association with their
owners. They eat, sleep, and thieve together ; and if the dog were not of
Sir Wilfrid Lawson’s opinion on the subject, they would, after a success-
ful raid on the squire’s preserves—like Tam o’ Shanter and Souter
Johnny—“be drunk for weeks together.”

Lurchers will run either by nose or sight, as suits them, but always
cunning. Let them start a hare, they will probably make for the meuse
and meet poor Wat; but their great game is with crouching stealthy step
to pounce on him in his form.

All of them will retrieve their game. Watch that itinerant tinker and
collector of sundries, trudging behind that thing on four wheels he calls
a cart, drawn by a nag that should be at the knacker’s ; he has seen the
keeper heading for the Pig and Whistle. “Hie in, Jerry! ” and the
lurcher that enters the spinney empty mouthed, comes out two hundred
yards below, and deposits a hare at his master’s feet.

As before said, these dogs vary greatly in general size and shape,
and so they do in colour, but my beau ideal of a lurcher is a heavyish
greyhound conformation with enough of the colley to make them look in-
telligent, and in colour red, brindle, or a grizzle.﻿The Whippet.

45

Chapter VI.—THE WHIPPET.

By Corsincon.

Tim whippet, or snap dog, as he is also called, is a great favourite with
workmen in Durham and other northern counties, and the Darlington
Show never fails to bring together a large collection of them.

It is not, however, for the show bench, but the race ground that he is
bred, where they are matched against each other for speed and for their
superiority in rabbit coursing. I cannot describe them better than by
saying they are a greyhound on a small scale with a dash of terrier.

An account of the dog racing for which these whippets or snap dogs
are used, and which is so popular with the working classes in many
parts of the north, will be interesting.

The dogs are handicapped according to their known performances, &c.,
and the distance run is two hundred yards. They are entered as
“ Thomson’s Rose, 19£lb.,” as the case may be, and the weight appears
on the handicap card. Dogs are weighed in an hour before the time
set for the first heat, and are allowed four ounces over the declared
weight. The winner of the heat is weighed again immediately the
heat is run. For the second heat eight ounces are allowed. For
the final race additional extra weight is allowed, that being run on
the following Saturday. The dog generally gets a light meal—half a
pigeon, or a chop, or piece of steak—after running his second trial heat on
the Beoond Saturday ; so he weighs a bit heavier the second time of scaling.
The modus operwndi will be best illustrated by the following description
of a race meeting reoently held at Farnworth Recreation Grounds, near
Bolton. There were sixty odd heats of three dogs. The course is a
perfectly level path of twelve yards in width. The dogs are stripped
and put on their marks, eaoh being held by his owner, or a man
for him, and the starter goes behind them with the pistol. Mean-
while a man the dog knows starts off in front of him, carrying a
big piece of linen rag, or some conspicuous object, sometimes a big tuft
of grass or a pigeon’s wing; and every now and then, as he runs up the
oourse, he will turn round and “Hi” to the dog, at the same time
waving the cloth up and down. When these runners up have got pretty﻿46

British Dogs.

near the finish, the pistol is fired and the dogs are released. The
runners up must then get over the ten-yard mark, beyond the finish
line, and the dogs, running right on, snatch the cloth with their teeth
and hang to it like grim death. Each dog has a piece of ribbon round
his neck, according to his station—red, white, or blue; and the judge
or referee, as he is called, holds up a flag of the winning colour to
show which has won. The cloth is called “bait,” and “live bait” is
forbidden.

The following is a copy of rules in force at a number of racing grounds
in the Manchester district, which will make the working of this popular
pastime clear:

1.	All dogs that have never run at these grounds must be entered in
their real owner’s name and residence, also the town or place in which

FINISH

ID7DS

JUDGES BOX

BBMDlBflPMflRfSB

they are kept, or they will lose all claim in any handicap, and will be
subject to inspection at the scales ; and no person will be allowed to
run with live bait.

2.	Any person objecting to a dog on the mark, that heat shall be post-
poned. The objector and owner shall stake in the hands of the handi-
capper or referee £1 each at the time of objection, which must be made
into .£5 each before the last heat is run. If it cannot be proved on the
day of objection, the dog will run under protest. The person who owns
the dog shall leave it with the proprietor or handicapper until the
objection is proved right or wrong—if it is proved wrong the money to
be paid to the objector ; but if not proved the money to be paid to the
owner of the said dog.

3.	In any case of running-up for a wrong dog, both the owner, the﻿The Whippet.

47

“ runner,” and the dog will be disqualified. They will be expelled from
the grounds for twelve months, and will not be allowed to enter any
handicap during that time. Their names will also be published in the
sporting papers.

4.	Any owner of dogs attempting to weigh, or sending any other
person to weigh a wrong dog, both owner and dog shall be exoluded
from the grounds for twelve months.

5.	If a dog be disqualified after running, the second dog in the heat
shall be plaoed first, and if it is not possible to tell the second dog, all
the dogs in the heat shall run again, except the one disqualified. All
bets void on the heat.

6.	Should the dogs go when- the cap is fired, and not the shot, they
shall run again in all cases ; and any dog slipped before the cap or shot
is fired, shall forfeit all olaim to the handicap, except all the dogs go,
then it shall be a race.

7.	Only one runner-up allowed with each dog. Any one not at the
mark when the previous heat is over will be disqualified in any part of
the race. The runners to be ten or fifteen yards over the mark, according
to the rules of the ground, when the dogs finish, or the dogs they
represent will be disqualified. In all heats dogs must start at their
respective marks.

8.	All bets stand whether the dogs run or not, excepting bets on
heats, when backers must have a race for their money.

9. That entries for dog handicaps shall close on Saturdays (Monday
morning’s post in time); and no entries will be taken after Monday
morning on any account. This rule applies only to handicaps run on
two succeeding Saturdays; when run on other days it will be subject
to alteration as announced in bills.

10.	If the proprietors and handicappers at any of these grounds make
a mistake in a dog’s start, and, not detecting it, allow any dog to run
the first day, it Bhall not be disqualified through the handicapper having
made a mistake in the start, and all bets must stand.

11.	Any dog entered “ old ” and not over five years old will be dis-
qualified in any part of the raoe, and lose all claim to bets or stakes.
No age will be taken after eight months old.

12.	Final Heat.—All dogs in the final heat shall be subjeot to
weighing and inspection. In weighing, they will be allowed 6oz. in﻿48

British Dogs.

addition to the usual allowance; and anyone taking his dog off the
course before the referee declares “All right,” shall forfeit all claim to
stakes and bets.

All disputes to be settled by the referee.

------------

Chapter VII.—THE SIBERIAN WOLFHOUND.

By Corsincon.

This is a dog of the Scotch deerhound type, and much the same in size.
The most striking difference is in the colour. The grizzle, almost
universal in the deerhound, gives place here to a mixture of colours.
The majority of those exhibited at our shows are white, with fawn or
yellow markings ; but a gentleman who reported a dog show at Moscow
for The Country, when there were about fifty exhibited, describes the
prevailing colour of the Barsee, as these hounds are called, to have been
white and dark grey ; and Minski, shown at Burton-on-Trent, is a
mixture of light and dark grey and white ; but certainly the majority we
see here are white and fawn or yellow.

They are scarce in this country, which is to be regretted, as they are
strikingly handsome and majestic. The best specimens I have seen are
Lady Emily Peel’s Czar, by the Duke of Hamilton’s Moscow out of
the Rev. J. C. Cumming Macdona’s Sandringham ; and the latter bitch
is also a grand one. Czar is a splendid fellow, white and lemon coloured,
in build corresponding with our best deerhounds; he has a good deep
chest, well sloped shoulders, airy neck, and noble head, with rather
full, almost amber-coloured eyes, which show bead-like, surrounded as
they are with white. He is altogether a dog of fine proportions and noble
appearance, and a first-rate specimen of the breed.

The texture of the coat is finer than in our deerhounds, and, from their
colour partly, they have a milder look than their name and work would
lead us to expect.

As an ornament and companion they are to be commended, and I hope
to see them become more plentiful.﻿The Persian Greyhound.

49

Chapter VIII.—THE PERSIAN GREYHOUND.

By Corsincon.

The specimens of this graceful but rather delicate variety are com-
paratively rare in England, still we generally have one or more at our
London shows.

They are of similar type to our greyhound but built more slimly,
wanting the great muscular development which the greyhound has ;
indeed, so delicate in appearance are those I have seen exhibited, that
they are in that respect an enlarged edition of the Italian greyhound.

They difFer from our greyhound also in having the ears larger,
drooping, and fringed with silky hair, much longer than on the body, and
the tail is similarly adorned.

They are used in hunting the gazelle, an interesting account of which
appeared in the “ Field ” newspaper some years ago. They are used in
relays, a custom which was at one time in practice in this country.

The most beautiful specimen I have seen is Mr. H. Allan’s Tierma, a
delicate fawn, standing, I should say, 22in. to 23in. at the shoulder.
Tierma has often been exhibited, and her great beauty has always
secured her a first prize on these occasions.

E﻿GROUP II.

Dogs that hunt their Game by scent, and kill.

1.	The Bloodhound.

2.	The Foxhound,
j. The Otterhound.
4. The Harrier.

Including:

5.	The Beagle.

6.	The Bassett.

J. The Dachshund

This group corresponds in head formation with the
second division of M. Cuvier. “ The head moderately
elongated, and the parietals diverging from each other
for a certain space as they rise upon the side of the
head, enlarging the cerebral cavity and the frontal
sinus.” Many, and notably those nearest approaching
the older types} are possessed of deep flews and abun-
dance of loose skin about the head and throat. They
are heavier in build and slower in pace than those in
Group i, and, although in several instances used to quest
for game only, the general employment of the group
is to hunt by scent only and to kill.

Chapter IX.—THE BLOODHOUND.

By Corsincon.

He who attempts to discover the origin and trace the history of any
one of onr breeds of dogs, beyond a comparativly few generations, will, in
most or all cases, speedily find himself in a fog, tosBed on a sea of doubt,
driven hither and thither by the conflicting evidence of the writers he
consults, who seem to emulate each other in the meagreness of the inform-
ation they give and the vagueness with which they convey it. To this﻿Roswell (K.C.S.B., 58)—Dam Flora, by Rufus (K.C.S.B., 61) out of﻿﻿The Bloodhound.

5i

the bloodhound is no exception, and it is, perhaps, wiser to accept the in
evitable, and frankly admit that we know very little about the origin o
this or any other breed, for at best we can but guess at the most probable
rom the very insufficient data at our command to form any certain
opinion. This is certainly a wiser and more dignified course than, as
many are disposed to do, prate about this, that, and the other breed
being the original dog of the British Islands. Of one thing I feel very
certain, that, could we go baok, say, a thousand years, and select a
-hundred of the finest specimens then living, and bring them as they then
were into competition with their descendants of to-day, say, at an
Alexandra Palace show, the whole century of them would be quickly sen
out of the ring as mongrels ; they would stand no more chance than a
herd of our ancient wild cattle would against a dairy of shorthorns.
Such, at least, is my opinion, and if anyone disputes it, let him prove me
wrong. The first printed book touching on dogs that we have is the
“ Book of Huntynge,” by Juliana Barnes, and the list of dogs given by
her does not include Bloodhounds, but it does the Lemor and Baohes,
both of which were dogs that ran their game by scent, and the former was
probably the nearest approach to our notions of a hound, and was used to
trace the wounded deer, &c., the name Lymer being taken from the fact of
his being led in leash. No doubt at this date, and for a long time
previous, English hounds were being modified by crosses from imported
-dogs brought in by the Norman conquerors from France, whence they
originally came from the East, and the slow hunting hounds of that day
have, by various commixture, produced for us the varieties we now
recognise.

Dr. Cains mentions the bloodhound as “ the greatest sort which serves
to hunt, having lips of a large size, and ears of no small length.” In
Turberville’s “ Book of Hunting ” there are a number of dogs portrayed}
all of the hound type, and with true hound ears, whereas, in the “ Book
of St. Albans,” printed a century earlier, the dogs represented have much
smaller ears, and thrown back, as the dogs are seen straining on the slips,
greyhound-like. Turberville has a good deal to say about hounds. If he
is to be credited, the progenitors of our modern dogs originally came from
-Greece, and the first of them that reached this country were landed at
Totnes. It was the oustom at that time to range the dogs according to
colour; of these, white and fallow, white spotted with red, and black

E 2﻿52

British Dogs.

were most esteemed. White, spotted with black or dun, were not so
much valued. The best Of the fallow were held to be those with their
hair lively red, with white spots on the forehead, or a white ring round
the neck ; and of those it is said “ those which are well joynted and dew-
clawed are best to make bloodhounds,” clearly showing, as passages from
all the old writers could be quoted to do, that the term bloodhound was
applied to the dog because of the work set him, and that, in fact, where
hounds are spoken of the bloodhound is included. Black hounds, called
St. Hubert’s, are described as mighty of body, with legs low and short,
not swift in work, but of good scent. The following couplet shows that
the St. Hubert hounds were highly thought of :

My name came first from holy Hubert’s race,

Soygllard my sire, a hound of singular grace.

Turberville says “ the bloodhounds of this colour prove good, especially
such as are ‘ cole ’ black.” The dun hounds are much nearer in colour
to our modern dog ; these were dun on the back, having their legs and
fore-quarters red or tanned, and it is added the light tanned dogs were not
so strong.

Gervase Markham, who was a very copious writer, follows Turberville
pretty closely. His description of a Talbot-like hound would, in many
respects, stand for a modem bloodhound, although certainly not in head,
on which point I fancy he has not expressed his meaning very clearly. He
says, “ a round, thick head, with a short nose uprising, and large open
nostrils ; ears exceedingly large and thin, and down hanging much lower
than his chaps, and the flews of his upper lips almost two inches lower
than his nether chaps; back, strong and straight; fillets, thick and
great; huckle bones, round and hidden ; thighs, round ; hams, straight;
tail, long and rash-grown, that is, big at the setting on, and small down-
wards ; legs, large and lean ; foot, high knuckled and well clawed, with a
dry, hard sole.

From all this, and much more that might be quoted, I gather that
whilst the dun and tan, that is, the black saddle back and tan legged
dogs, most nearly agree in colour with our bloodhound, it is a mere
accident of selection, although that may have been influenced by that
coloured dog showing more aptitude for the special work he was put to,﻿The Bloodhound.

53

and certainly the colour is admirably adapted to a dog used for night
work, as he was; and this reminds me that Dr Caius tells us these dogs
were kept in dark kennels, that they might better do night work. The
practice would assuredly defeat its object.

When the bloodhound was first used to track fugitives I have never
been able to discover; the first written notice of such a thing I am
acquainted with occurs in “Blind Harry’s Life of William Wallace,” the
Scottish patriot, as the following lines, which have been so frequently
quoted by writers on the bloodhound, show :

About the groud they set on breid and length
A hundreth men, chairgit in arms Strang,

To keep a hunde that they had them amang,

In Gillisland there wat that Brachellbred,

Bikyr of seen',, to follow them that Qed.

Sae was she used in Eske and Liddesdale,

Quhile she gat bluid nae fleeing might avail.

And again ;

But this sleuth brache, quilke sekyr was and keen.

On Wallace fute followit sae felloune fast
Qnilk in thar sicht thai prochit at the last.

In the traditions of the peasantry of the west of Scotland many stirring
stories of the “ hair-breadth ’soapes ” of Wallace and Bruce from blood-
hounds still live, and some of them at the present moment come up fresh
to the writer’s mind, although they have lain buried for many years.

In the wars in Ireland bloodhounds were used in a manner reflecting
little credit on the dominant power, and their scenting powers and
ferocity have, in later times, been used to hunt down the unfortunate
slaves in Cuba and elsewhere. For a stirring account of the employment
of over a hundred of these dogs in hunting down revolted negroes in
Jamaica, I refer the reader to the “ Sportman’s Cabinet.”

In our own country they were long bred and trained to track border
raiders, and a most exciting chase it must have been through those.wild
moorlands, as all who have read Scott, even without having visited the
scenes he so wall depicts, will say. The words of eulogy on the dead
Biohard Musgrave, pronounoed by “the stark moss-trooping Scott,”
William of Deloraine, who,

By wily turns and desperate bounds,

Had baffled Percy’s beet bloodhounds.﻿54

British Dogs.

will arise in every reader’s memory, but they will lose nothing by
repetition here :

Yet rest thee, God! for well I know
I ne’er shall find a nobler foe
In all the northern countries here,

Whose word is snaffle, spur, and spear.

Thou wert the best to follow gear;

’Twas pleasure, as we looked behind,

To see how thou the chase could wind,

Cheer the dark bloodhound on his way,

And with the bugle rouse the fray.

I’d give the lands of Deloraine
Dark Musgrave were alive again.

In later times the bloodhound has been used successfully in tracing
poachers. Meyrick, in his useful little work on dogs, gives an interesting
example of a successful poacher hunt, and he was often used for tracing
thieves, and as an instance of this, so late as the beginning of the present
century, the Thrapstone Association for the Prosecution of Felons—a
class of institution now almost obsolete—kept a trained bloodhound for
the tracking of sheep stealers. The description of the dog so employed, as
given by Somerville in “ The Chase,” is inimitable in its graphic force.
No one not thoroughly acquainted with hounds could have worked every
detail into so telling a picture :

Soon the sagacious brute, his curling tail
Flourished in air, low bending, plies around
His busy nose, the steaming vapour snuffs
Inquisitive, nor leaves one turf untried,

Till conscious of the recent stainB, his heart
Beats quick; his snuffling nose, his active tail,
Attest his joy; then with deep opening mouth,
That makes the welkin tremble, he proclaims
Th’ audacious felon; foot by foot he makes
His winding way, while all the listeLiDg crowd
Applaud his reasonings : O’er the watery ford,
Dry sandy heaths, and stony barren hills;

O’er beaten paths, by men and beasts disdained,
Unerring he pursues; 'till at the cot
Arrived, and seizing by his guilty throat
The caitif vile, redeems the captive prey.

So exquisitely delicate is his nose.

Somerville is not tbe only poet who has paid tribute to the wonderful
powers of this king of hounds. Tickell, in his poem on hunting, says :

O’er all the bloodhourd beasts superior skill,

To scent, to view, to turn, to boldly kill.﻿The Bloodhound.

55

The following quotation from Dr. Cains (temp. 1550) as to the nse of
bloodhonnds may prove snggestive, and enforce the arguments I have
repeatedly used in favour of the extraordinary scenting powers of this
noble hound being again utilised as a thief taker. Burglaries, especially
in rural and suburban districts, never were more rife ; the capture of the
thieves is often due to some happy accident, but capture and detection of
the perpetrators	of	these	crimes too rare. The use of	well trained

bloodhounds would,	I am	persuaded, prove most valuable	in lessening

this class of crime, because of the absolute certainty with which they
could be trained to track the felon, even when put on the scent hours
after the deed had been committed.

The dog was probably first used to trace deer stealers when the
stringent forest laws of the Norman kingB were in force, and after-
wards his aptitude for the work was used for extended purposes.
That may be merely conjecture, but Dr. Caius seems to strengthen
the idea; he says they “ do not only chase the beast while it liveth,
but being dead	also by	any manner of casualty make	recourse to

the place where	it	lieth,	having in this point a sure and infallible

guide, namely, the scent and savour of the blood sprinkled here
and there upon the ground, for whether the beast being wounded doth
notwithstanding enjoy life and escape the hands of the hunts-
man, or whether the said beast, being slain, is conveyed clearly out
of the park (so that there be some signification of bloodshed), these dogs
with no less facility and earnestness than avidity and greediness, can dis-
close and bewray the same by smelling, applying to their pursuit agility
and nimbleness, without tediousness, for which consideration of a singu-
lar speciality they deserved to be called somguinarius bloodhounds.
And albeit, peradventure it may chance that a piece of flesh be subtlely
stolen and cunningly conveyed away with such provisos and precaveats
as thereby all appearance of blood is either prevented, excluded, or con-
cealed, yet these kind of dogs, by a certain direction and an inward as-
sured notice and privy mark, pursue the deed doers through long lanes,
crooked reaches, and weary ways, without wandering away out of the
limits of the land whereon these desperate purloiners prepared their
speedy passage ; yea, the nature of these dogs is suoh, and so effectual is
their foresight, that they can bewray separate and pick them out from an
infinite multitude and an innumerable company, escape they never so far﻿56

British Dogs.

into the thickest throng, they will find him out notwithstanding he
be hidden in wild woods, in close and overgrown groves, and lurk in hol-
low boles apt to harbour such ungracious guests.

“Moreover, although they should pass over the water, thinking thereby
to avoid the pursuit of the hounds, yet will not these dogs give over their
attempt, but, presuming to swim through the stream, persevere in their
pursuit, and when they be arrived and gotten to the further bank they
hunt up and down, to and fro run they, from place to place shift they,
until they have attained to that plot of ground where they passed over,
and this is their practice, perdie they cannot at the first time smelling find
out the way which the deed doers took to escape. So at length get they
that by art and cunning and diligent endeavour which by fortune and
luck they cannot otherwise overcome, in so much as it seemeth wisely
written by Elianus to be as it were naturally instilled and poured into
these kind of dogs, for they will not pause nor breathe from their pursuit
until such time as they be apprehended and taken which committed the
fact. The owners of such dogs use to keep them in close and dark channels
in the day time, and let them loose at liberty in the night season, to the
intent they might with more courage and boldness practise to follow the
felon in the evening and solitary hours of darkness, when such ill-dis-
posed varlets are principally purposed to play their impudent pranks.

“ These hounds, when they are to follow such fellows as we have
before rehearsed, use not that liberty to range at will which they have
otherwise when they are on game (except upon necessary occasion, where-
on dependeth an urgent, an effectual persuasion, when such purloiners
make speedy way in flight), but being restrained and drawn backward
from running at random with the leash, the end thereof the owner hold-
ing in his hand, is led, guided, and directed with such swiftness and
slowness (whether he go on foot or whether he ride on horseback), as
he himself in heart would wish for the more easy apprehension of these
venturesome varlets.”

The employment of dogs in the detection of a great crime quite
recently brought the question of the utilisation of the bloodhound for
such purposes up for discussion. In the case referred to the dog had
displayed no more sagacity than is common to the whole species,
advantage being taken of the deep sensation produced by the inhuman
nature of the crime to impose as a wonderful performance the most﻿﻿MR. E. BIRD’S BLOODHOUND “BRUTUS” (K.C.S.B., 4029).
Sire Roswell (K.C.S.B., 58.)—Dam Rufia by Regent (K.C.S.B., 50).﻿﻿﻿The Bloodhound.

57

ordinary event on the ignorant and credulous. It is not, however,
altogether impracticable to make these hounds auxiliaries to the police.
A well-trained hound will trace the steps of the fugitive after many
hours, and in cases of burglary or other crimes in rural districts, as
already said, their employment might be useful. It certainly seems a pity
that, kept as he is now as a noble companion, the wonderful power
nature has given him should, with but few exceptional cases, be allowed
to lie dormant.

Having cursorily glanced in the first part of this chapter at the
bloodhounds of our forefathers through such dim light as he is at all
visible, I now turn to him as he is in our own day, the noblest of all
the hound tribe, so patrician in appearance that he calls up to the
imagination pictures of old baronial halls with their wide-extending
parks and noble woods, rather than the surroundings in which the
majority now only see him on the show bench, where he, as by right of
birth and blood, heads the long list of canine aristocracy. To write of
the bloodhound and not quote the unparalleled lines of Scott in the
‘ ‘ Lay of the Last Minstrel ’ ’ were rank heresy. The beauty of these
lines has been so much better eulogised by the writer of the article on
“Bloodhounds” in the “Penny Cyclopaedia,” that I quote them
verbatim as an introduction to the lines theniselves: ‘ ‘ This is one of
the best poetical descriptions of the bloodhound in action, if not the
best, for though Somerville’s lines may enter more into detail, they
want the vivid animation of the images brought absolutely under the
eye by the power of Scott, where the ‘ noble ohild,’ the heir of Brank-
eome, is left alone in his terror : ’ ’

Starting oft, be journeyed on,

And deeper in the wood is gone.

For aye, the more he sought his way
The farther still he went astray ;

Until he heard the mountains round
Ring to the baying of a hound..

And harkand hark! the deep-mouthed bark
Comes nigher still, and nigher ;

Burst on the path a (’ark bloodhound.

Hip tawny muzzle tracked the ground,

And his red eye Bhot fire.

Soon as the ’wildered child saw he,

He flew at him right furiouslie.

I ween you would have r eeu with joy
The bearing of the gallant boy,

When, worthy of Hs noble sire,

His wet oheek glowed ’twist fear and ire﻿58

British Dogs.

He faced the bloodhound manfully
And held his little bat on high;

So fierce he struck, the dog, afraid,

At cautious distance hoarsely bay'd,

But still in act to spring.

When dashed an archer through the glade,

And when he saw the bound was stayed,

He drew his tough bow-srring.

But a rough voice cried, “ Shoot not, hoy!

Ho shoot not, Edward—’tis a boy.”

The bloodhound of to-day, changed as he no donbt has been by
“ modern refinement, collateral crosses, and experimental commixture,”
stands an average height of about 27in., bitches an inch or more less.
He possesses a commanding dignity of appearance, with an attractive-
ness of expression that is truly noble; he seems to rest with silent
confidence and self-reliance in the consciousness of his own power and
importance; and, as he reposes on his bench in stately form calmly
viewing his admirers, receives their adulations in stately fashion, as “to
the manner bom.” When seen in action he moves more gracefully
than the more massive mastiff, and gives an impression of a well-
adjusted union of activity and strength.

The head is remarkably striking ; it is large and long, high domed,
and peaked at back of skull—in comparison with its length it is narrow ;
the upper jaw is also long and narrow, ending with wide-spread
capacious nose ; the upper lips or flews are thin and deep, hanging well
below the under jaw. The ears, low set on, are remarkable for their
great length, hanging like folds of graceful drapery to such depth they
can be made to meet before the nose. There is a quantity of loose
skin about the head and throat, giving the attractive wrinkled appear-
ance to the face, and the “ dewlaps like Thessalian bulls,” called
“ throatyness.” The eye is deep-seated, calm, and scrutinising, and
full of expression, the “ haw ”—from its red appearance, probably
named from the berry of the white thorn—well exposed. The neck
is longer in reality than appearance, shoulders fairly sloped, and fore
legs, stout, straight, and muscular, with the feet round, and well
padded; splay feet are objectionable ; the claws are large, strong,
and black in colour. The barrel of moderate length, ribs deep and
well sprung; loins and hind quarters very muscular; the tail of great
length, set on high, thick at the base, and tapering, but not to a
fine point—very pliant. “Stonehenge” says “gracefully waving;”﻿The Bloodhound.

59

another writer says “ lashing,” and carried moderately high; but it is
of little consequence which description we accept.

Colour has been, if it is not still, a vexed question. “ Stonehenge ”
says “ black-tan, or deep and reddish fawn (no white should be shown
but on just the tip of the stern).” “Dogs of the British Islands”
(first edition) says “ a reddish tan, darkening gradually towards the
upper parts till it becomes black on the back. A white patch on the
body, a white face, or a streak down it, proclaims a stain which is death
to all hope of purity of blood.”

I cannot believe in colour as an infallible test of purity of blood.
I have seen how these hounds were bred from those of various colour,
and Pennant, writing the end of last century, claims for them a black
spot over each eye—a characteristic of the old Southern hound. Does
this ever appear in litters now ? Mr. Holford, a successful modern
breeder, says : “ There is almost invariably more or less white on the

chest............The less white on the feet the better. There should

be no white on any other part of the body, though few breeders would
reject a dog solely on account of colour if all other points were good.”

Those that are spotted with white are esteemed by many, and, when
thus faintly flecked or dappled, the effect is greatly to enhance the
appearance of the dog in the eyes of many. I certainly very much
admire it, but question its being any proof of purity.

The coat is short, fine, and thick, but, of course, this is much
modified by the ciroumstances of rearing, keeping, and work. The
voice, once heard, is not to be forgotten: it is awfully deep and loud,
with a prolonged sonorous melody; and, heard at night, when the
mountain echoes sullenly fling back a dull response, it has quite a solemn
and weird effect.

The points of the bloodhound, as generally accepted, are :

Head.................................................. 15

Ears and Eyes ....................................... 1

Flews and Dewlap ..................................... 10

Neok................................................... 5

Chest and Shoulders................................... 10

Baek and Back Bibs ................................... 10

Legs and Feet ........................................ 20

Colour and Coat........................................ 5

Stern.................................................. 5

Symmetry ............................................. 10

Total

100﻿6o

British Dogs.

Among the best bloodhounds that have been exhibited, I may
enumerate Major J. A. Cowan’s Druid, Dauntless, Dingle, Draco ; Mr.
T. A. Jennings’s Druid; Mr. C. E. Holford’s Regent, Matchless, and
Trimbush; Mr. E. Reynolds Ray’s Roswell, Baron, and Baroness ;
Mr. Edwin Brough’s Rufus; Sir Fowell-Buxton’s Luath, and Capt.
Clayton’s Luath; and those now (1878) that take the lead at our
exhibitions are Mr. Bird’s Brutus; Capt. J. W. Clayton’s Luath XI.,
too pale coloured for modern fancy, but a grand hound, with a long,
deep, narrow head, peaked skull, and abundance of flew, wrinkles, and
dewlap ; Mr. Leger G. Morrell’s Rollo, rich in colour, and grand in
head; Mr. Mark Beaufoy's Merton; Mr. Herbert Singer’s Judge, a
stout built, dark coloured, and excellent young hound; and Mrs.
Humphries’ Don, without exception the finest made specimen of the
breed I have seen, full of quality, with all the special attributes of the
bloodhound well developed, although the skull is neither quite so narrow
or peaked as in some of his competitors.

Of first-class bitches, Mr. J. C. Tinker’s Dido, I think, ranks the
highest, and her success in the show ring has been uninterrupted. Mr.
Johnstone Auld’s Harmony, Dr. Forbes Winslow’s Bell, and Mrs.
Humphries’s Haidee, are also magnificent hounds of the true type.

Through the courtesy of their owners, I am enabled to give particulars
of measurements of some of the above-mentioned hounds, which will be
of use for comparison with others.

Mrs. Humphries’s Don Age, 4£ years ; length from nose to set on of
tail, 49in. ; length of tail, 18in.; girth of chest, 35in. ; girth of loin,
29fin. ; girth of head, 18in ; girth of forearm, 8 Jin.; length of head
from occiput to tip of nose, 13in. ; ears from tip to tip, 27£in.; each
ear, 9£in. ; between ears, 8£in.; depth of flews, 6iin.

Mr. J. T. Tinker’s Dido: Age, 1 year 7£ months ; weight, 871b. ;
height at shoulder, 25fin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 45fin.;
length of tail, 18£in.; girth of chest, 33in.; girth of loin, 26in.; girth
of head, 18in. ; girth of forearm, 8 Jin. ; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, lljin.; length of ears from tip to tip, 25in.

Capt. J. W. Clayton’s Luath XI.: Age, 4 years; weight, 1071b.;
height at shoulder, 27in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 46in.;
length of tail, 19in. ; girth of chest, 36Ln.; girth of loin, 32in.; girth
of head, 23in.; girth of forearm, 9in.; length of head from occiput to﻿The Bloodhound.

61

tip of nose, 13in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 14in.; length from tips of ears across forehead, 26in.

Mr. W. Herbert Singer’s Judge : Age, 1 year 7 months ; weight, 891b. ;
height at shoulder, 27in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 48£in.;
length of tail, 18£in.; girth of chest, 33£in.; girth of loin, 27in.; girth
of head, 17in.; girth of forearm, 9Jin.; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, 12in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
10£in. ; length of ears from tip to tip, 29in.

Mr. J. E. W. Wilbey’s Cassy (6861) : Age, 2 years 8 months ; height
at shoulder, 24£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 45in.; length of
tail, 16£in.; girth of chest, 32in. ; girth of loin, 25in. ; girth of head,
19in.; girth of forearm, 8fin.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, lOin.; length of ears, 24£in.

Rev. R. Fowler’s Druid: Age, uncertain; weight, 941b.; height at
Bhoulder, 24in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 52in.; length of
tail, 16in.; girth of chest, 14in.; girth of loin, 34£in.; girth of head,
27in.; girth of forearm, 10£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 13in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 18in.;
ears from tip to tip, 27in.

Rev. R. Fowler’s Lufra: Age, 3 years; weight, 861b.; height at
shoulder, 24in.; length from nose to set on of tail. 43in.; length of tail,
17in.; girth of chest, 12in.; girth of loin, 33in.; girth of head, 21in. ;
girth of forearm, 9fin.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, llin.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 13^in.; ears from
tip to tip, 26in.

We give an engraving of Mr. E. Bird’s Brutus, winner of a cup and
two firsts at Birmingham, second twice at Crystal Palace, and also
second at Alexandra Palace. Brutus was bred by his owner, and he is
by Mr. Reynolds Ray’s Roswell out of Rufia, by Mr. Holford’s Regent
out of Doris, by Rockwood out of Bird’s Vengeance ; and the following
notice of him appeared in The Country report of the Birmingham show,
1875 : “Brutus is wonderfully good, although considered by many short
in leg, but he has a magnificent head, grandly carried, and is well made
throughout; anything he loses in height is compensated by his bone and
substance and symmetrical frame.’’

Don, the subject of our other engraving, is by the old champion
Roswell out of Flora, by Rufus out of Hilda. Roswell was by the Duke﻿62

British Dogs.

of Beaufort’s Warrior out of sister to Rufus. Don is considered by
many of our best judges the bloodhound of the day, and he is,
unquestionably, the best framed and most symmetrical hound of the
breed we have seen. He has taken first prize at Manchester, Bristol,
Alexandra Palace, and many other places, and the couple of magnificent
puppies by him taking second and third prizes at the Irish Kennel
Club, April 1, 1879, proves his capability of transmitting his grand
proportions.

Although the bloodhound is now rarely hunted in packs, Lord
Wolverton still does so, hunting regularly at the present time seventeen
and a half couples. His lordship exhibited a few of his hounds at the
Bristol show, November, 1878, and fine specimens they were, especially
the grand old dog Harold and the beautifully modelled bitch Freedom.

Chapter X.—THE FOXHOUND.

By Vert.

The writer of the following spirited article, has been a frequent
contributor to The Country, and well known as a judge at many of
our most important shows, and that he is equally at home and happy
in the field as in the ring no reader of his article on the Foxhound can
doubt. “Vert” says :

“ Our Saxon forefathers hunted down the fox not so much for sport as
to protect their slender stock of poultry, lambs, and sucking pigs from
* the subtle, pilfering foe, prowling around in midnight shades,’ and
were wont to proclaim his mort-note in joyous blasts from the sonorous
throat of the cowhorn ; and we do not suppose that they would be very
particular as to the kind of hound they employed for their purpose.

“ Who ever asks where, or when, or how, the wily fox is ta’en ” until
victorious William and his son Rufus taught them with horn and voice
to cheer and discipline the pack ? For centuries the chase was reserved
for royalty and the nobles of the land; and it was not until “ our George﻿The Foxhound.

63

was king ’ ’ that the middle classes were allowed to join in the sport,
when the yeomen and farmers in various parts of England got up packs
of hounds for hunting the fox, each giving bed and board to one or more
couples, which they brought together on appointed hunting days.
These were called trencher packs, from the manner in which they were
billeted out on the members of the clubs. Several such packs are still
kept in the northern counties, and afford their supporters plenty of
sport.

The first pack of foxhounds, with huntsman and whippers-in on
horseback, was established about the middle of the last century in
Dorsetshire, and hunted the Cranbourne Chase country for several
years, when they were purchased by Mr. George Bowes, grandfather of
the present Mr. John Bowes, of Streatlem Castle, after which they
hunted the Durham country, and initiated northern foxhunters into the
proper way of following the sport.

The Brocklesby Hound list, which is one of the earliest, dates from
1786, the first sire recorded being Dover, by Fitzwilliam’s Bumager.

Mr. Farquharson hunted Dorsetshire from 1806 to 1858, fifty-two
seasons, and had ninety couples of honnds in his kennels. He bred his
bitches to about 21in., and his dog hounds to 23in. high, and they
brought thirteen hundred and forty-seven brace of foxes to book in
twenty-one seasons. In the season 1842-1843 the nose tally of this
kennel was eighty-seven brace.

Mr. Meynell, who hunted the Quorn for twenty-four seasons, did not
care to have them under 24in., and Mr. Assheton Smith, who succeeded
him, raised the standard to 25in. Of the old masters, the Duke of
Grafton, Lord Lonsdale, and Mr. Warde liked to have them very little
under 26in.

Mr. Hall, the present master of the Holderness, has hunted that
country for thirty-five seasons without intermission, having won his
first spurs on the grey-tail Screveton, with Mr. Digby Legard, in 1820,
and has since learnt the “ hang ” of every field from Sledmere plantation
to Lammas stream, of which local tradition avers that, by sounding the
depth of that dainty-looking water trap, Mr. “ Nimrod ” Apperley had
the freedom of Holderness conferred on him, and that he carried away a
luckless Lammas minnow in his boot as his precept of initiation. Mr.
Hall cares more for the working qualities of his hounds than an inch﻿64

British Dogs.

or so in height; and, besides his doings at home with the Holderness,
he has also carried his banner to the fore amongst the crack riders, and
at all the crack meets in the shires, from Lord Tarborongh’s at Cainby
Corner and the Quorn at Rolleston to Lord Chesterfield’s at Bullock
Smithy.

In January of 1836, a knot of twenty-one second horses, by a lucky
nick-in, gained the rising ground and caught a head view of the Belvoir
bitch pack pressing hard on a Piper Hole fox up the vale, near the close
of a fast forty-eight minutes ; the first flight being reduced to seven
horsemen, with Tom Goosey at the fag end.

“ Lord Forrester is leading them, on the grey,” says Tom Chambers,
alluding to a grey holding a centre lead of a good twenty lengths. Men-
tally, we had already claimed the grey as one of the Yorkshire contin-
gent ; and, biding our time, as he led down the swede ridges, and closely
scanning his charge at the ox-fence—too stiff to bend and too tough to
break—we caught the certainty, and broke out: “ It’s the Lord of
Holderness that’s on the grey, my lads ; and all the lords in Leicester-
shire can’t catch him!” Nor could they! And when the fox was
pulled down, two fields ahead, there were only three claimants up
for the twenty-one fresh horses at hand, the noble lord above alluded
to not being one of them. Will. Gooda.il was second whip on that
day; and when he took the horn in 1842 he reduced the Belvoir
standard from twenty-four to twenty-three inches, and in the seaeon
of 1854 he killed one hundred and ten foxes in one hundred and
twelve days.

“We don’t call foxhounds dogs” was the crusty retort of Tom
Parrington, the Yorkshire secretary to a Craven scut-hunter, on the eve
of the Skipton hound show. But, with all due deference to the cherished
reservation of the mighty mentor, we not only call the foxhound a dog,
but the dog of dogs, and premise that, from a national point of view,
foxhounds are of more importance than all other breeds of dogs clubbed
together.

We have weekly records of hunting appointments, from 167 packs
of foxhounds in Great Britain and Ireland, which collectively engage to
hunt about five hundred and forty days a week, besides which we are
cognisant of several other established packs of foxhounds not included
in the lists, and probably six hundred hunting days a week would be﻿The Foxhound.

65

nearer the mark, and this goes on (‘weather permitting’) for nearly
half the year.

“It is a clearly ascertained fact that a country cannot be properly
hunted three days a week for less than <£3000 a year, or four days a week
for less than <£4000 a year, and if we make this a basis for calculation,
we have as an approximate no less a sum than <£600,000 a year spent
on foxhunting establishments alone, to say nothing of the enormous
sums spent on the private studs of those for whom the sport is provided,
nearly every shilling of which is not only spent at home, but on home
products, and filters through every branch of the home trade.

I do not rhyme for that dull elf
Who cannot picture to himself

that the chief reason why our ‘ flower of chivalry ’ are the finest and
best field officers in the world is owing to the knowledge of the manage-
ment of the horse, and the courage inspired thereby acquired by early
lessons taken in the hunting field.

“ There is no breed of dogs that have attained to such a high degree of
perfection in form and substance as Foxhounds. Their pedigrees have
been longer and better kept; their breeders have united science with
practice for many years past, and the result shows the master’s hand.
They have also been long under the control of a class with whom petty
jealousies do not stand in the way of improvements, the services of a
favourite hound in most packs being available for any other kennel if
properly sought, of which we have an instance in the case of the late Sir
Bichard Sutton, who, in a letter to a brother M.F.H., written only a
few days before his death, says, ‘ Send bitches to Glider,’ Glider being
considered the best hound in Sir Bichard’s kennel.

“ The modern Foxhound possesses in the highest degree thep roper
conformation for courage, scenting powers, speed, and endurance, which
proclaim him a workman of the first order and a model of canine per-
fection to breed up to—a model such as Petrarch in the equine world,
that we may fancy to have said at the St. Leger post, ‘ Tell Kisber and
the gentlemen that I am here waiting.’ In short, the Foxhound is a
pattern card for the breeders of pointers, setters, retrievers, &o., to help
them to breed out chumpy heads and lumpy shoulders, lanky backs and
cranky hind quarters, leathery necks and narrow chests, cow hocks and
weak feet and pasterns.

F﻿66

British Dogs.

“ To give a list of the names of the patriarchs of the stud which have
taken their part in bringing the foxhound to his present standard of
excellence would fill a volume of no mean size. Most kennels have had
their Tarquins and Furriers, their Ring woods and Rallywoods, to make
or mar their destinies. Yorkshiremen of the old regime would swear by
Sir Mark Sykes’s Aim well, that Chalon transferred to canvas, and whose
grand head ‘ gardant ’ is considered the choicest specimen from that
artist’s easel. His written eulogy—

Aimwell is by judges called a handsome hound,

And always foremost when the fox is found,

being attributed to the pen of Major Healey, than whom few had a more
correct eye for horse or hound, or stronger nerve or better hand, as he
proved when he jumped the iron-spiked gate in the Welham carriage
drive when on the swing, without disturbing a hair on the clever brown
bay, Hard Bargain. Willing and Wanton, and a long array of W’s have
kept up the dark patchy Aimwell’s reputation in this and other kennels.

“ Willing was a wonder at carrying a scent over sticky fallows ; but,
being too fast for Tom Carter on the wolds, she was transferred to
Brocklesby, where Will Smith did not give her many trials before he
returned her with ‘ She’s of no use to me ; we can’t keep her in sight.’
But Carter had no cause to regret the return, as she bred him Warrior
and Woodman to Splendour. The former carried home the fox’s head
the first day he was out; and, if allowed, he would always do so, be the
distance never so great.

“ Of the fifty couples in the Eddlesthorpe hound list of 1842, before the
kennel was transferred to Birdsall account, for the third time during the
half century, Wanton and her sister Willing contributed ten and a half
couples. The Mennithorpe miller never forgot his short cnt across the
kennel meadow at Eddlethorpe, when Wanton, catching Bight of his
dusky figure flitting through the early dawn, opened tongue, and,
deserting her Shiner puppies, after a brief run, gave him a two hours
and twenty minutes bay in the ash tree, at the end of which time he
was released by Robert Wise, the kennelman, as he arose to his duties
at 5 a.m. ‘Tak’ her away, Robert,’ he pleaded; ‘I was runnin’ ti
Burythorpe to fetch t’ cow doctor ; dea tak’ her away ! ’

“ The Brocklesby hounds, like the Yarborough estates, passed in male﻿The Foxhound.

67

tail, of which the old lord, regardless alike of the tooth of time or the
increase of the gods, decreed, ‘We will fall our Brocklesby oaks
every hundred years and our ashes every fifty.’ The Brocklesby horn
also descended from father to son for several generations, and old Will
Smith’s last command to his son and successor was, ‘ Stick to Banter.’

“ Tom Sebright was first entered to the chase by running after his
father’s primitive pack in the New Forest, where they would hunt any-
thing from a deer to a dragon fly. He was then caught up and schooled
by Mr. Musters; thence he' passed to Sir Mark Sykes for three
seasons, when he was transferred to Mr. OsbaldeBton as whip, with this
recommendation, ‘ He kills all our horses.’ In 1822 he entered upon
his forty years’ service under Earl Fitzwilliam, and hunted the Milton
hounds up to his death in 1862, having spent well-nigh half a century
in breeding and hunting hounds. He had his favourite Furriers and
Feudals ; but the cheery face of the veteran never beamed more radiantly
than when he dilated on the Quorn Tarquin of his whipper-in days.
‘ There never was such another hound as Trimbush ’ was Will Danby’s
rooted belief, and he had had a lifetime of experience in the Baby,
Holderness, Ainsty, and Harworth saddles. No day was too long and
no seduction powerful enough for this unpledged disciple of Father
Matthew, always excepting the curat^oa substitute in the coffee cup
when the Holderness meet was under the old Scorbro’ elms ; but he took
much more kindly to this little counterfeit than any allusion to his fast
fifteen minutes with the Neswick badger, which he pulled down on
Tibthorpe Wold. The tastes of Danby’s henohman, Ned Oxtoby, also
ran in the temperance groove; and he proved that his mother was no
false prophetess when she predicted that ‘ he was born to be a hunts-
man,’ as the Holderness killed their fox under her cottage window at
Long Biston in the same hour in which he first saw light, and he himself
was strong in the faith that his mission in life was foxhunting. When
the leading houndB once went headlong after their fox over the Speeton
Cliff he begged a farmer to fetch a cart rope and lower him over the
precipice, and he was drawn up first with Lavender in his arms, and then
made a second descent for Petticoat, both of whioh, but for this gallant
rope adventure, must have been left to perish among the seagulls and
kittiwakes.

“ Will Goodall’s lease of life was as brief as hiB hunting oareer was

P2﻿68

British Dogs.

brilliant. But bis faith in the 23in. Brocklesby Eallywood did good
service to the Belvoir kennel; and when he laid down his horn in 1859
he left a pack of hounds which, for matchiness in size and colour, as also
for steadiness and working qualities, has rarely, if ever, been equalled.
His last advice to Ben Morgan was ‘ hold by the Alfred sort; they are
such close workers, and have got me ont of many a difficulty.’

“ Will Derry, like Ben Morgan, preferred gay, raking hounds of the
24in. stamp, and both men were quick and clever in the field, and great
killers of foxes. Nothing delighted Ben so much as to get on the trail
of a good fox that would take them over the Holderness or the York and
Ainsty frontier, and nothing short of failing scent or closing darkness
would prevent his being brought to book. Both Derry and Morgan were
hard riders, and proved the truth of the axiom that ‘ If welter weights
break horses’ backs, light weights break horses’ hearts.’

“ Puppies are mostly whelped during the spring months, and, as soon as
able to take care of themselves, they are taken out to quarters amongst
the farmers, where they lead a dolce far rviente sort of life, and are
fetched in about the next February, when the lambs begin to drop. On
their return they are branded with the initial of the hunt, and their
ears are shortened by rounding off the points, to prevent them dipping
into the feeding trough, and thus becoming coated and greasy, which
would induce canker on the edge of the ear. Each now receives a
name, and their education begins in good earnest—being constantly
schooled into submission and confidence—for even Tom, the whip’s,
manner of rating a delinquent is open, decisive, cheery, and instructive,
and in marked contrast with Whistle, the head-keeper’s bullying and
degrading appeal to a recalcitrant pointer, which oftener results in a fit
of either the shivers or the sulks than in any knowledge of the fault
committed or the duties required.

“ The beautiful manner in which the Quorn entries behaved at the late
Yorkshire Hound Show at Skipton was worth a day’s journey to witness
—especially in the case of Alice, the winner in the unentered bitch class
—coming up to every call and turning to every wave of Tom Firr’s
hand, true as the magnet to the pole.

“ Some of the hard riding Holderness farmers, whose hearts are in the
sport, are proud of being trusted with a favourite bitch before she pups,
when for her accommodation and comfort they cut a hole in the bieldy﻿The Foxhound.

69

side of the straw stack, where she rears her whelps far better than in
any kennel. It is customary in most hunts to have the young unentered
hounds judged during the summer, when prizes, whioh take the shape of
silver cups, silver teapots, or handsome silk dresses, are awarded to the
lady of the house where the best looking puppy has been walked in the
previous year; so that every farmer’s wife wants to have charge of a
good looking one to qualify her chance for the next show day.

“ Draft hounds are such as can be spared from the pack, and are drawn
for size as above or below the desired standard of the kennel, or for
some fault, real or imaginary. These are the perquisites of the hunts-
man, and usually fetch three to four guineas a couple. Drafts from the
best packs are in great request, being often bespoke long before the time,
and command higher prices.

“ Promoters of monster dog shows must have been profoundly purblind
when they placed Foxhounds in their prize schedule, or they would have
foreseen that M.F.H.’s of important packs would never send hounds to
be oribbed, cabined, and confined for the week about, running the
gauntlet of all the ills that dog flesh is heir to; to be poked and
provoked by the canes of incipient man-milliners, and submitted to the
judgment and criticism of lapdog fanciers—the Whitby deadlock of ’75
to wit. ‘ What’s that lang chap, wi’d fine gleaves on keep leaking inta
their e’en for ?’ asked a Bilsdale jet miner, who had tramped ten miles
on foot and thirty-six by rail to back ‘ oor Charlotte,’ and had lost his
money in the first over. ‘E’en,’ replied his companion in travel, ‘he’s
leaking up their noases, mum, to see which has the sharpest scent.’

“ From the Waterloo year to the advent of the Russian campaign may
be termed the Homeric period of foxhunting. Fields were more select
and less crowded, first-flight men had less difficulty in recruiting theii
studs, as thoroughbreds too slow for the turf were then drafted to the
hunting stable, instead of being, as of late, degraded into steeplechasers,
timber-toppers, and instruments of cheating and robbery. Fallows were
not generally gridironed by drain-pipes and ‘ catch ’em up ’ wire fences,
and asphalte had not taken possession of the country. Coverts were not
yet sacred to St. Pheasant, nor was there then a branch railway to cross
the line of every fox. However, things look brighter in the north, for
the engine drivers on the Richmond branch line, who have mostly one or
more orosBes of the sportsmen in them, have deoided to respect the﻿70

British Dogs.

scarlet sleeve of the master of the Bedale, and when they see it standing1
at danger they draw np to a standstill, and allow his spotted beauties to
cross scathless. But the N.E.R. is accustomed to take things easy, and
the traveller who has crawled through Quaker Straits by the North
Passage without having his time wasted or his temper spoilt must have
dropped into a hopeless state of uselessness.

“ The music of hounds breaking covert, blended with the windings of the
huntsman’s horn, is something to be remembered with pleasure ; but it
is reserved for those whose nights are spent within earshot of the kennel
to listen to that matchless song of unpricked music which, once heard, is
never to be forgotten—the midnight chorus of a pack of foxhounds, as it
breaks on the ear and swells in tuneful cadences in the dark and stilly
night; when Harmony and Audible pitch the keynote, and Musical and
Singwell and Songstress carry on the air, waking old Charon and
Crowner, that put in the bass notes, while Vocal and Tuneful and
Rhapsody and Bantipole and a score more swell the choir and prolong
the song. The wakened kennelman starts from his pillow, but, catching
bon-accord notes ere he can clutch the handle of the riot bell, gives pious
thanks that it is Harmony, and not old Discord, that breaks his dreams,
composes himself, and drops off to sleep again.”

To the foregoing remarks by “ Vert ” we add the following, as giving
information on points not touohed upon by him.

Two qualities have always been considered essential in the Foxhound
—nose and endurance, and to that is now added speed. To ensure
the latter two qualities perfect symmetry is essential; by which is
meant harmony and due proportion of each part relatively to the other
and to the whole, and as applied in the present instance, includes the
adaptability for displaying a high rate of speed conjointly with great
stoutness by the special development and strengthening of certain parts
towards that end.

Mere size has nothing to do with this, and on that point there is still
difference of opinion, although still the balance, as in the days of
Somerville and Beckford, is in favour of a middle sized hound, but that
must always be a question to be determined to a considerable extent
by the nature of the country to be hunted.

On the subject of size Beckford says, “ I most approve of hounds of
the middle size, and believe all animals of that description are strongest﻿The Foxhound.

71

and best able to endure fatigue.” Aud Somerville, in “ The Chase,” gives
his views on this point in the following words :—

But here a mean

nor the large hound prefer, of size
; he in the thick-woven covert
Painfully tugs, or in the thorny brake
Tom and embarrassed bleeds; but if too small
The pigmy brood in every furrow swims;

Moiled in the clogging clay, panting, they lag
Behind inglorious; or else shivering creep,

Benumbed and faint, beneath the sheltering thorn.

Foxhounds of middle size, active and strong,

Will better answer all thy various ends,

And crown thy pleasing labours with success.

The head must be of good size and well balanced, forehead well pro-
nounced without being unduly prominent, good length of skull and also
of muzzle, which is not pointed, the nostrils being wide and open ; the
ears, which are generally rounded to prevent them from getting torn, set
on low and closely carried.

The neck from the head should gradually swell towards the shoulder ;
it is long and muscular, without coarseness, clean, and free from dewlap
or throatiness, such as characterise the bloodhound and old southern
hound.

The shoulders should be strong and clean, not loaded, and well sloped,
the arms long and muscular, the elbows thereby being well let down. It
is essential the elbows should be quite straight, in a line with the body,
to insure the requisite speed.

The chest should be deep and fairly wide, the ribs, especially the back
ribs, coming down well, giving strength and a certain degree of square-
ness without clumsiness.

The back and loins must be strong, and connected with abundanoe of
muscle.

The hind quarters of the foxhound must also be very strong, the
buttocks firm and muscular, the thighB long, letting down - the hock well,
and the stifles but slightly bent.

The legs and feet are of great importance. The leg bone Bhould be
great, and the musoles hard and firm. They should be “straight as
arrows,” and the feet round and compaot, with high knuckles, strong
claws, and a hard, firm sole.

The ooat must be close, Bhort, and rather hard in texture. The chief

Observe,

Gigantic﻿72

British Dogs.

colours are black and white, black tan and white, hare pied, and badger
pied.

The stern should be thick at the root, gradually tapering, carried well
up with a gentle arch, and fringed slightly with strongish hair.

Chapter XI.—THE OTTER-HOUND.

By Corsincon.

Although many writers describe the Otter-hound as a dog of mixed
breed, all refer him back to the old southern hound, or the bloodhound,
for his origin, whatever crosses may have been resorted to to produce the
dog we now recognise as the legitimate hound to pursue the ‘ ‘ Fish-
slicer.” Blaine says he is the old southern hound, crossed with the water
spaniel, and that those with a dash of the bulldog in them are the best,
the water spaniel being supposed to supply the roughness of coat—for
water spaniels of last century were very different in coat as in other
points to those dogs of to-day called by that name—and also to give or
increase the aptitude for swimming, whilst the bulldog cross is supposed
to have infused the necessary hardiness, courage, and tenacity.

Both Touatt and Richardson suppose him to be the result of a cross
between the southern hound and the rough terrier, and by others the
rough deerhound has been held to have had a share in the production of
the otter hound. I am strongly of opinion, however, that if any such
crosses have ever occurred, either by accident or design, it is so remote
and slight as to be now quite swallowed up, and as a stream lost in the
immensely larger volume of the river to which it is a tributary, so has
any infusion of alien blood been absorbed by the true old English hound
blood of the genuine Otter-hound.

The hunting of the otter is one of our most ancient sports. Jesse, in﻿i﻿﻿The Otter-hound.

73

his researches into the history of the dog, gives many interesting quota
tions from ancient documents showing the pursuit with hounds of

This subtle spoiler of the beaver kind

to have been a royal pastime with many of our English kings. In July,
1212, the Sheriff of Somerset received commands from King John to
“ provide necessaries for Ralph, the otter huntsman, and Godfrey, his
fellow, with two men and two horses and twelve otter hounds as long as
they find employment in capturing otters in your shire.” And John, the
otter hunter to King Edward I., had twelve otter dogs under his charge.
An annual payment, called “ Kilgh Dourgon,” was made in Wales for
the king’s water dogs with which they hunted otters ; and James I., an
ardent sportsman, had for his master of Otter-hounds John Parry to super-
intend the hunt and provide for the king’s diversion, and so on from
reign to reign, otter hunting has, with varying patronage and popularity,
remained a British sport, and at the present day there are, on the
authority of “Stonehenge,” at least nine packs hunted, of which the
following is a list: “ Subscription paoks at Carlisle, under the master-
ship of Mr. Carrick ; in Northumberland, near Morpeth, under Mr. A.
Fenwick ; and at Cockermouth, hunted by a committee. In South Wales,
Colonel Pryse and Mr. Moore have each a pack; while in England the
Hon. Geoffrey Hill hunts the otter from his kennelB at Hawkestone,
Salop, and Mr. Collier’s, from Culmstock, near Wellington. In the west,
Mr. Cheriton and Mr. Mildmay also pursue the sport.” It is neither my
province to desoribe otter hunting nor my purpose to attempt it; but
some reference to it I have considered necessary that the hound engaged
in this sport and the qualifications required iu him may be better under-
stood. From the time when he is driven from his “ wicker couch,” con-
trived ‘ ‘ within some hollow trunk, where ancient alders shade the deep
still pool,” until

The mephitio otter gives his pursuers plenty to do, and when it comes to
close quarters, be it with terrier or hound, makes, as opportunity offers,
good use of his teeth. Traced by his spraints and seal, and unharboured
from his. kennel or couch, he finds hard work for men and dogs, as the

Pierced through and through,
On pointed spears they lift him high in air﻿74

British Dogs.

latter follow him up from holt to holt and pool to pool, and the huntsmen
eagerly watch for his vents.

In recent times otter hunting has been modified to suit different cir-
cumstances, and practices in vogue in one hunt are tabooed in another.
The spear is discontinued, and the practice of tailing the otter—that is,
rushing in on him when worn and pressed, seizing him by the tail, swing-
ing him round in presence of the hounds to excite them, and finally
throwing him among them—whilst treated as an act of prowess in some
otter-hunting districts, is strictly forbidden in others.

A breed of dogs selected and kept to this game, even if originally of
the identical stock of our modern bloodhounds, would naturally diverge
in some characteristics, and the wet-resisting coat, so necessary to a
dog so much in the water, would be developed; whereas, on the
contrary, the treatment the companion bloodhound is subjected to
tends to fine and soften his coat, or there may have been, and I think
it highly probable, if not capable of absolute proof, that there were
rough-coated hounds of the bloodhound type from which the otter hound
has sprung, and, according to Cains, bloodhounds were used for this
sport, but whether either of these suppositions is correct or not, he is
in shape and voice and style so truly a hound that I cannot think he
is indebted to a strain of either spaniel, terrier, or deerhound blood for
his rough and wet-resisting coat.

In general appearance—always excepting the coat—he much resembles
the bloodhound; he should be perfect in symmetry, strongly built, hard
and enduring, with unfailing powers of scent, and a natural antipathy to
the game he is bred to pursue. The head should be large, broader in
proportion than the bloodhound’s, the forehead high, the muzzle a fair
length, and the nostrils wide. The ears are long, thin, and pendulous,
fringed with hair. The neck is not naturally long, and looks shorter
than it really is from the abundance of hair on it; the shoulders should
slope well, the legs be straight, and the feet a good size, but compact;
the back strong and wide, the ribs, and particularly the back ribs, well
let down; the thighs should be big and firm, and the hockB well let
down ; the stem well and thickly covered with hair, and carried well up
but not curled; the colours are generally grizzle or sandy, with black and
tan more or less clearly defined. The subject of our engraving is Mr.
J. C. Carrick’s Charmer ; the drawing was made out of the hunting﻿The Harrier.

75

seaBon, and when she was fat, and the position adds to that appearance,
which most consequently be allowed for; but her head and front are
wonderfully well done, and the artist has canght the expression well.

The following are the weights and measurements of two of Mr.
Carriok’s best hounds :

Mr. J. C. Carrick’s Lottery : Age, years ; weight, 76£lb.; height
at shoulder, 24in.; length from nose to set on of tail, S9in. ; length of
tail, 17in.; girth of chest, 30in.; girth of loin, 24in.; girth of hehd,
17in.; girth of forearm, 7in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
10£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, llin. ;
ear, 8£in.

Mr. J. C. Carriok’s Da/nger:	Age, 1£	years ; weight, 731b.;	height	at

Bhoulder, 25£in.; length from	nose to	set on of	tail, 4<Hin.;	length	of

tail, 18in.; girth of chest, 31in.; girth of loin, 23in. ; girth of head,
18in.; girth of forearm, 7in.; length	of head	from occiput	to tip	of

noBe, llin.; girth of muzzle	midway	between	eyeB and tip	of nose,

ll£in.; ear, 9in.

Chapter XII.—THE HARRIER.

By Corsincon.

Of the various breeds of hounds, none has undergone greater modifica-
tions than the Harrier or hare-hound, so called from his having been kept
exclusively, or nearly so, to the pursuit of that game.

Caius describes him as ‘ ‘ that kind of dog which nature hath endued
with the virtue of smelling, whose property it is to use a justness, a
readiness, and a courageousness in huntingand further, “ we may
know these kind of dogs by their long, large, and bagging lips, by their
hanging ears reaching down both sides of their chappes, and by the
indifferent and measurable proportion of their making ; this sort of dog
we call Leverarius, Harriers.”

Such a description, meagre as it is, applies more to the dog we still
recognise as the old southern hound—if, indeed, that type has not been﻿76

British Dogs.

entirely improved out of existence—than to the harrier of to-day, for it is
long since hare hunting was revolutionised, and the slow plodding hound
that would dwell on the scent, giving vent to the keenness of his own en-
joyment of the chase, and delighting the sportsman with melodious
tongue whilst following puss in her every wile and double, has had to make
way for the modern hound, possessing more dash and speed, which force
the hare to depend on her swiftness rather than on cunning devices to
evade her pursuers.

Harriers, like other classes of hounds, have been bred and varied to
suit the requirements of the country they are hunted in and the taste
and even whims of the owner. “ Stonehenge,” in his original work on
the dog, says, “The true Harrier is a dwarf southern hound, with a
very slight infusion of the greyhound in him.” But I should think, to
get the increased speed required, it would be unnecessary and unadvis-
able to go to the greyhound for qualities to be obtained from a nearer ally
—the light and fleet northern hound, which cross would not endanger or
diminish the scenting power. Beckford, a sportsman and brilliant writer
on sporting, whose opinions were, and still are, authoritative as far as
applicable to the altered circumstances of our day, writing the end of last
century, says : “ The hounds I think most likely to show you sport are
between the large slow hunting Harrier and the little fox beagle ; the
former are too dull, too heavy, and too slow—the latter too lively, too
light, and too fleet. The first, it is true, have most excellent noses,
and I make no doubt will kill their game at last if the day be long enough
—but the days are short in winter, and it is bad hunting in the dark.
The other, on the contrary, fling and dash, and are all alive ; but every
cold blast affects them, and if your country be deep and wet, it is not
impossible that some of them may be drowned. My hounds,” he goes
on to say, “ were a cross of both these kinds, in which it was my
endeavour to get as much bone and strength in as small a compass as
possible. I tried many years and an infinity of hounds before I could
get what I wanted, and at last had the pleasure to see them very hand-
some, small, yet very bony; they ran remarkably well together, went fast
enough, had all the alacrity that could be desired, and would hunt the
coldest scent.”

The Harrier in most externals is almost a facsimile of the fox-
hound, but the head is in proportion heavier, the skull flat and﻿The Harrier.

77

broad, the ears set on low, being close and fine in texture ; the
“large and bagging lippea ” of the days of Cains, with the attendant
abundance of dewlap, have been bred out ; the neck long and airy,
rising with a gradual swell from the shtfulders, which must be well
placed, sloping back, and clothed with muscle ; the forearms strong,
elbows well let down and in a straight line with the body; the fore legs
perfectly straight, large of bone, neat strong ankles, and a foot round,
firm and close, the knuckles arched, but not immoderately so, the claws
Btrong, and the sole firm and hard; the chest must be capacious; the
back broad and strong, lined with hard muscle, the ribs, especially the
back ones, well let down ; the loin deep, and, like the hind quarters, very
strong, the thighs very muscular, clean hocks, without a suspicion of
“cromping” (that is, cow hocked, leaning in towards each other), and
the leg from the hock down should be short and strong, the stem must
be thick at the setting, and gradually tapering to the point ; well
covered with hair without being bushy, and carried gaily and almost
straight. The whole build of the Harrier is most symmetrical—there
should be literally no waste about him. The coat should in texture be
moderately fine, very dense, and the colour various, black, white and tan,
blue mottles, badger pied, hare pied, and a variety of combinations, in
which the colours are often very beautifully blended.

Delicacy of scent and perseverance are essential qualities in the Harrier,
and the tongue should be rich and melodious.

Through the courtesy of the master of the Holcombe Hunt, Alfred
Ashworth, Esq., of Egerton Hall, Bolton-le-Moors, I am enabled to give
the measurements of one and a half couples of the Holcombe harriers—
one couple of dogs and a single bitoh. I have also been favoured with
measurements of two of Mr. C. D. Everett’s harriers, which I give
below.

Sergeant-. Age, 3 years; weight, 631b.; height at shoulder, 22in.;
length from nose to set on of tail, 37in.; length of tail, 12£in. ; girth
of chest, 29in. ; girth of loin, 21in.; girth of head 16iin. ; girth of
forearm, 7iin.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 10£in.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, llin.

Swinger: Age, 3 years; weight, 621b.; height at shoulder, 22in. >
length from nose to set on of tail, 36£in.; length of tail, 13in. ; girth
of chest, 29iin. ; girth of loin, 21in.; girth of head, 16£in. ; girth of﻿78

British Dogs.

forearm, 7fin.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, lOin.; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 10£in.

Barmaid: Age, 4 years; weight, 561b.; height at shoulder, 21|in.;
length from nose to set on of tail, 37in.; length of tail, 13in.; girth of
chest, 272in.; girth of loin, 22^in.; girth of head, 15|in.; girth of fore-
arm 7£in. ; length of head from ocoiput to tip of nose, lOin. ; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, lOin. These hounds
have a pedigree for a hundred years back in the Holcombe Kennels.

Mr. Chas. Dundas Everett’s Gladsome : Age, 2 years ; weight, 34fclb.;
height at shoulder, 19£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 36in. ;
length of tail, 14in. ; girth of chest, 27in.; girth of loin, 21in.; girth
of head, 19in.; girth of forearm, 6|in.; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, lOin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
lOin.

Mr. Charles Dundas Everett’s Glider : Age, 2 years ; weight, 321b. ;
height at shoulder, 19£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 36in.;
length of tail, 12£in. ; girth of chest, 27in.; girth of loin, 20in. ; girth of
head, I7in.; girth of forearm, 7in.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, lOin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, lOin.

Lancashire is the home and centre of Harrier hunting, and the
Holcombe pack is pure Harrier blood. Sergeant and Swinger are a
wonderful pair, pronounced by competent judges to be the grandest
couple of Harriers in Lancashire, which is about equivalent to saying in
the world. The three are thoroughly representative and true made
Lancashire Harriers, not too large, but strong, compact dogs, with
plenty of lip and plenty of music, with still a nice clean neck, grand
ribs, and low, good straight legs and cat feet, just the stamp to give
a good account of themselves over the rough bleak hills of the country,
where it is not a question of doubling round a few fields, but, after all
the windings, of killing the game three or four miles as the crow flies
from the find.

﻿﻿﻿The Beagle.

79

Chapter XIII.—THE BEAGLE.

By Corsincon.

This ia another and the smallest of hounds or hunting dogs, as the name
“Beagle,” which means smallness, implies. The following description
from Somerville’s poem, “ The Chase,” applies with propriety to either
the Beagle or harrier, and is as clear, minute, and correct as it is

beautiful:

His gloasy slfin, or yellow pied or blue,

In lights or shades by Nature’s pencil drawn,

Reflects the various tints; his ears and legs,

Flecked here and there in gay enamelled pride,

Rival the speckled pard; his rush grown tail
O’er his broad back bends in an ample arch;

On Bhoulders clean upright and firm he BtandB;

His round cat foot, straight hams, and wide-spread thighs,
And his low drooping chest, conf ess his speed,

His strength, his wind, or on the steepy hill
Or far extended plain.

Of the antiquity of the breed there can be no doubt. It is said that
Queen Elizabeth owned a pack so small that they could be carried in a
man’s glove—a statement which we must take cvm gra/no salis. Gervase
Markham describes “the little Beagle which may be carried in a man’s
glove ”—probably a mere quibble, the fact being that these dogs were bred
bo small that one could be easily carried in a gloved hand. Whilst on
the subject of their size I may quote the following from the “ Sportsman
Cabinet,” published 1803 : “The late Col. Hardy had once a collection
of this diminutive tribe amounting to ten or twelve couple, which were
always carried to and from the field of glory in a large pair of panniers
elung aoroBS a horse; small as they were and insignificant as they would
now seem, they could invariably keep a hare at all her shifts from
escaping them, and finally worry or rather tease her to death.”

Although Gervase Markham doubtless refers to the Beagles of the time
of Elizabeth, it is singular that Johannes Cains, in his “ English Dogges,”
does not mention the beagle, nor does he specially refer to any diminu-
tive hound, although he lived during the first fifteen years of Elizabeth’s
reign, when dwarf “ Binging Beagles ” are reported to have been popular.﻿8o

British Dogs.

These small hounds are spoken of by Oppian as one of the kind of dogs
peculiar to the ancient Britons :

There is a kind of dog of mighty fame
For hunting; woithy of a fairer frame;

By painted Britons brave in war they’re bred,

Are beagles called, and to the chase aTeled,

Their bodies small, and of so mean a shape,

You’d think them curs that under tables gape.

Not only in the time of Elizabeth, but in our own, there has been an
occasional rage for very diminutive Beagles, and much emulation in pro-
ducing the most perfect liliputian hound. The writer of the article on
this breed in “ The Dogs of the British Islands ” describes Mr. Crane’s
Southover Beagles as perfect in symmetry and excellent in nose and in-
telligence, and not exceeding 9in. in height, and all of them model
miniature hounds. It is to be regretted that the Beagle is not more en-
couraged by committees of shows, and that, when a class is made for
them, all sizes are lumped together.

I have spoken of the Beagle as a dwarf hound, which he is, but there
is a considerable difference in outline between him and the modern fox-
hound ; the former is not so clean in the shoulder, his head is different in
shape, the skull being in proportion broader and flatter, and the jaw
shorter, the ear longer, and there is always more or less dewlap or
throatiness.

Beagles may be fairly classified as hare Beagles and rabbit Beagles,
other distinction than size being minor. Their power of scent is ex-
quisitely keen and their intelligence great, and when well sorted in
these respects and in size, work wonderfully together, puzzling out even
the coldest scent, whilst their music is most charming.

Although occasionally, they are not much used with the gun, except in
driving woods and spinnies for rabbits, &c.

Of whatever size, the Beagle should be shapely, as free from lumpy
shoulders as possible, legs straight, and more bone and stronger pasterns
than is generally seen would be an improvement; the ears are very long,
hang close, and are very fine in the leather; ribs rather more rounded
than in the foxhound, with the back ribs well let down ; back and loins
strong, and hind quarters very cobby and muscular ; the tail roughish and
gaily carried. The colours are various, as in the harrier, and chosen to
suit individual tastes.﻿The Beagle.

81

This article, when it appeared in The Country, called forth the following
letter of friendly criticism, which is well worthy of a place here :

“ In his paper on the beagle, I observe that ‘ Corsincon ’ affects to class
the breed into hare and rabbit beagles, with the remark that other
distinction than size is ‘ minor.’ Now, it is not very often I find room
to differ with ‘ Corsincon,’ bnt I honestly confess I do here. In the
first place I believe the term rabbit beagle to have been coined for a
half-breed between the beagle and the terrier. The beagle pur et simple
is, and ever haB been, a hound valued essentially for its exquisite power
of scent; bred, as Gervase Markham tells us, * for delight only, being
of curious scents, and passing cunning in their hunting, for the most
part tiring, but seldom killing the prey.’ The different requirements in
a hare hound and a ‘ rabbiter ’ are strikingly pronounced. In the
former, delicacy of nose is all important; but in the latter, where the
quarry is rarely found further than a stone’s throw from his burrow,
which he can dart into before you can shout ‘ knife,’ the less nose in
your dogs the better. Of course I am fully aware that beagles are
occasionally employed in driving woods and spinnies, as well as gorse
and fern brakes for rabbits, but I say there is no special breed for this
purpose either in size or character.

“ A pack of these half-bred small-sized terrier-beagle-rabbiters is given
by Stradanus in his thirty-eighth plate, with an explanatory quatrain by
Duffloeus:

Callidus eflosais latitare curriculus antris
Et generare solet. Verum peraaep& catelli
Anglomm celeres fallunt pecus: ore prehendunt
HIubuhi : prsedam venatorique miniatrant.

“Now for the second chapter of my disagreement. I maintain there
are as many types of beagles as there are of spaniels, mastiffs, or St.
Bernards. Some are rough as Jack Bussell’s terriers, or Mr. Carrick’s
otter hounds ; others as smooth and silky coated as a dachshund or a
toy terrier. There are strains—possibly derived from a cross with the
foxhound—showing the olean cut throat and symmetry of a Manchester
terrier ; and quite as familiar is the exact double of the Segusian dog
mentioned by Arrian in the third chapter of his ‘ Book on Coursing ’ :—

‘ Shaggy and ugly, and Buch as are most high bred are most unsightly.’
Again, there is a very distinct variety in ‘ the Kerry beagle,’ a

a﻿82

British Dogs.

specimen which may, roughly speaking, be described as a miniature
bloodhound, being of precisely the same colour, and sharing many of
that noble dog’s chief characteristics, The beautiful short legged
basset of France, the dachshund of Germany, and the peculiar Swedish
beagle, are but branches of the one family, which most truly exists in all
the symmetry of variety.”

The following description and points of Beagles are by H. A. Clark,
Esq., Master of the Cockermonth Beagles :

“ Head, like a foxhound, not quite so broad across forehead, with
sweet, intelligent countenance, the head long, and the nose should not
come to a sharp point.

•'“Ears long, and set on low down, and carried close to head, not too
broad, and the thinner in the leather the better.

“ Neck and throat long and lean, but some of the heavier hounds are
very loose in throat and have a deep voice.

“ Shoulders long and strong, well clothed with muscle.

“ Chest deep and wide; ribs also deep.

“ Back strong and wide, and especially wide across loins. Bitches are
generally better across loins than dogs, for their size.

“ Hind quarters, the stronger the better, wide and deep ; stem strong
at set on, and tapering, carried high, but not curled.

“ Legs straight, although for work they are no worse standing a little
over on the forelegs, strong of bone; feet round, like a cat.

“ Colour, black, white, and tan ; black and white. I had a heavy dog
this colour, that was always first to find game, and always led. He was
well known among the Cumbrians, and they knew his voice, and said,
‘Dar, that’s auld Duster; we’ll have a ran noo.’ Occasionally beagles
are the colour of bloodhounds.

“ The beagle should be hard in condition, with plenty of muscle.

“The Cockermouth beagles hunt the hare often on Skiddaw and
in the lake district. Some capital runs are enjoyed about Buttermere,
where it is a grand sight to see the little hounds on the breast of a
mountain, when a sheet could cover them sometimes, and their cry
is melodious. It takes us all our time to keep up with them on a good
flat country. In the season 1878 and 1879 we killed eighty. We do not
mount our huntsman. In summer the dogs are sent out to farms, &c.,
to walk, and are great pets with children.”﻿﻿XLAIS’ FRENCH BASSET “MODEL” (K.C.S.B. 78;﻿The Basset.

83

The following are the measurements of two good dogs :

Mr. H. A. Clark’s Comely : Age, 6 years; weight, 27£lb. • height at
shoulder, 14fin. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 30in. ; length of
tail, llin.; girth of chest, 21in. ; girth of loin, 18in.; girth of head,
13$in.; girth of forearm, 5£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 8in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
7£in.; length of ears from tip to tip, 17in.

Mr. H. A. Clark’s dog Crowner: Age, 5 years; weight, 26£lb. ;
height at shoulder, 15in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 31in.;
length of tail, 10£in. ; girth of ohest, 22in.; girth of loin, 18£in. ; girth
of head, 14in.; girth of forearm, 6in.; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, 7fcin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
8in.; length of ears from tip to tip, 17£in.

Chapter XIV.—THE BASSET.

By Snapshot.

The following article is from the pen of “Snapshot” (a frequent
contributor, under that signature, to The Country, and also well known
as “ Wildfowler ” of the “ Field ”), who is the author of numerous canine
artioles and works, including “Wildfowling,” “General Sport at Home
and Abroad,” “The Various Breeds of Foreign Hounds and other
Sporting Dogs,” &c. His experience with continental sporting dogs has
been considerable, which gives weight and value to his article on bassets.
He says:

“Any hound which stands lower than 16in. (no matter his ‘ provincial ’
breed) is called in France and in Belgium a basset. The derivation of
the expression basset is dear, i.e., bas means low ; and, therefore, basset
means low Bet, a very appropriate denomination as applied to these
diminutive hounds.

G 2﻿84

British Dogs.

“The vast army of French and Belgian bassets may be divided into
three grand classes, viz., bassets d jambes droites, straight legged ; ditto, d
jambes demi-torses, with forelegs half crooked; and ditto, d jambes torses,
forelegs fully crooked. And in each of these classes will be found three
varieties of coats, viz., the bassets d poil ras, smooth coated; those
d poil dwr, rough coated; and a class half rough half smooth ooated,
which is called half grifEons.

“ The types vary for almost each province, but the general charac-
teristics remain throughout pretty well the same. All well-bred bassets
have long, pendulous ears, and hounds’ heads ; but the crooked-legged
breeds show always better points in these respects than the straight-
legged ones, simply because, when a man wishes to breed a good basset
a jambes torses, he is obliged to be very careful in selecting the stock to
breed from if he doeB not wish his experiment to end in failure; for,
should there be the slightest admixture of foreign blood, the ‘ bar
sinister ’ will be at once shown in the forelegs. Hence, the bassets
d jambes torses show, as a rule, far better properties than their
congeners.

“ In build the basset d jambes torses is long in the barrel, and is very
low on his pins; so much so, that, when hunting, he literally drags
his long ears on the ground. He is the slowest of hounds, and his
value as such cannot be over-estimated. His style of hunting is peculiar,
inasmuch that he will have his own way, and each one tries for himself ;
and if one of them finds and ‘ says ’ so, the others will not blindly
follow him and give tongue, simply because he does (as some hounds,
accustomed to work in packs, are apt to do), but, on the contrary, they
are slow to acknowledge the alarm given, and will investigate the
matter for themselves. Thus, under covert, bassets d jambes torses
following a scent, go in Indian file, and each one speaks to the line
according to his own sentiments on the point, irrespective of what the
others may think about it. In this manner it is not uncommon to see
the little hounds, when following a mazy track, crossing each other’s
route without paying any attention to one another ; and, in short, each
of them works as if he were alone. This style I attribute to their
slowness, to their extremely delicate powers of scent, and to their innate
stubborn confidence in their own powers. Nevertheless, it is a fashion
which has its drawbacks; for, should the individual hounds hit on﻿The Basset.

85

separate tracks of different animals, unless at once stopped and put
together on the same one, they will each follow its find, and let the
Bhooter, or shooters, do his or their best. That is why a shooter who is
fond of that sort of sport rarely owns more than one or two of these
hounds. One is enough, two may be handy in difficult cases, but more
would certainly entail confusion, precisely because each one of them will
rely only on the evidence of his own senses.

“ I have now several clever bassets A jambes torses, in my mind’s eye,
and their general description would be about as follows : Height between
lOin. and 15in. at shoulder, longish barrels, very crooked forelegs, with
little more than an inch or two of daylight between the knees, stout
thighs, gay sterns, conical heads, long faces, ears long enough to overlap
each other by an inch or two (and more sometimes) when both were
drawn over the nose, heavy-headed rather, with square muzzles, plenty of
flews and dewlap, eyes deep set under heavy wrinkles, forepaws wide and
well turned out, markings hare-pied and white, black-tan and white, tan
and white, black with tan eyebrows, and tan legs and belly, &c.—in
short, all the varieties of hound markings will be found among them. They
have excellent tongues for their size, and when in good training and good
condition they will hunt every day, and seem to thrive on it. They are
very fond of the gun, and many are cunning enough to ‘ ring ’ the game,
if missed when breaking oovert, back again to the guns until it is shot.
Some of these bassets are so highly prized that no amount of money will
buy them, and, as a breed, it may safely be asserted that it is probably
the purest now in existence in France. They hunt readily deer, roebuck,
wild boars, wolves, foxes, hares, rabbits, &c., but if entered exclusively
for one species of quarry and kept to it, they never leave it to run riot
after anything else. I have seen one, when hunting a hare in a park,
running through fifty rabbits and never noticing them. They go slowly,
and give you plenty of time to take your station for a shot—hence, their
great value in the estimation of shooters. They are chiefly used for
smallish woods, furze fields, and the like, because if uncoupled in a forest
they do not drive their game fast enough, and though eventually they
are bound to bring it out, yet the long time they would take in so doing
would tell against the sport. Moreover, large forests are cut about by
ditches, and here and there streamlets, boulders, and rocks intervene,
which difficulty the short crooked-legged hound would be slow in﻿86

British Dogs.

surmounting. He is, therefore, not so often used there as for smaller
coverts, where his voice can throughont the hunt be heard, and thereby
direct the shooters which post of vantage to take.

“ As regards the coats of bassets d jamles torses, there are both rough,
half-rough, and smooth-coated specimens ; but the two latter predominate
greatly. In fact, I have but rarely seen very rough bassets A jambes
torses. I saw three once, in the Ardennes. They were very big hounds
for bassets, and were used chiefly to drive wolves, roebuck, and wild
boars. They were d poil dur with a vengeance, and, when ‘ riled,’
their backs were up like bristles. Of course in these matters, the
chasseurs breed their hounds accordingly to the ground they have to hunt
over, and, accordingly, it will be found that in provinces of comparatively
easy coverts, such ae vineyards, small woods, furze fields, &c., smooth-
coated or half-rough-coated bassets are in universal demand, In Brittany,
Vendee, Alsace, Lorraine, Luxemburg, on the contrary, wherever the
coverts are extensive and very rough, rougher-coated hounds are used;
but poil dwrs are scarce, as far as diminutive hounds are concerned.

‘ ‘ Bassets d jambes demi-torses are simply crosses between bassets d
jambes derm-torses and bassets d jambes droites. They are usually bigger
than the former and smaller than the latter, although it must be borne in
mind that there are several varieties of bassets d jambes droites, quite as
small as the smallest with crooked legs. In short there are so many
subdivisions in each breed that any classification must necessarily be
general.

‘ ‘ The advantages claimed by the owners of bassets d jambes derm-
torses are these:	1st, these hounds are almost as sure-nosed

as the full-crooked breeds ; 2nd, they run faster, and yet not fast enough
to spoil shooting; 3rd, in a wood with moderate ditches, being bigger in
body and higher on the leg than the full-orooked beagles, they can clear
the ditches at a bound, whereas the full-mmbes torses has to go down into
them, and scramble up on the other side. In points they are pretty much
like their congeners, but already the cross tells. The lips are shorter, the
muzzle not so stout in proportion to general size; the ears are much
shorter, the skull is less conical, the occiput being not so pronounced,
the body is not so long, the stern is carried more horizontally, the feet are
ronnder, the wrinkles in the face are fewer, the eye is smaller, and the coat,
as a rule, is coarser; the increase in size is also great. I have seen such﻿The Basset.

87

reaching to fully sixteen inches, and I believe they had been obtained by
a direct cross from a regular chien coura/nt (hound) with a full basset
& jambes torses. When sire and dam are both good, there is no reason
why the progeny should not answer the breeder’s purpose, but I confess
to a tendenoy for either one thing or another, and were I to go in for
fanoy for that breed of hounds I would certainly get either a thoroughly
crooked basset or a thoroughly straight-on-his-pins beagle. By the way,
a black and tan or a red basset & jambes torses cannot by any possible use
of one’s eyes be distinguished from a dachshund of the some colour although
some German writers assert that the breeds are quite distinct. To the
naked eye there iB no difference, but in the matter of names (wherein
German scientists particularly shine) then, indeed, confusion gets worse
confounded. They have, say, a dozen black and tan bassets d ja/mbes
torses before them. Well, if one of them is a thorough good looking
hound, they call him dachs bracken ; if he is short-eared, and with a
pointed muzzle, they cap him with the appellation of a dachshund.
Between you and I, kind reader, it is a distinction without a difference,
and there is no doubt that both belong to the same breed. I will, at a
fortnight’s notice, place a basset d jambes torses, small size, side by sid6
with the best dachshund hound to be found, and if any difference in legs,
anatomy, and general appearance of the two can be detected, I shall be
very greatly surprised. That the longer-eared and squarer-muzzled
hound is the better of the two for practical work there is not the shadow
of a doubt; but, of course, if digging badgers is the sport in view, then
the dachshund terrier is the proper article. But that is not to be
admitted. One cannot breed hounds from terriers, whereas one can breed
terriers from hounds, and therefore the dachshund terrier is descended
from the basset d jambes torses. As for dachshund hounds, they are in
every respect bassets d jambes torses ; at least, that is the opinion I have
come to after a great deal of experience. Quarreling about names is an
unprofitable occupation. Never mind the ‘ bracken ’ or the ‘ hund,’
since the two artioles are alike. I say, from the evidence of my senses,
that they must come from the same stock, and since they cannot oome
from a terrier pedigree, the hound one is the only logical solution.

“ The basset d jambes droites is synonymous with our beagle ; but,
whereas our beagles rarely exceed 14in., it is not uncommon to see some
bassets reaching even 16in. in France ; but, it should be remembered﻿88

British Dogs.

that, then, even among the French, appellations will differ. Thus, a
certain school will call 16in. bassets petits chiens coura/nts, and will deny
them the right of being called bassets, being, in their estimation, too
high on the leg. I agree with them. The characteristics of bassets d
jambes droites are : a somewhat shorter face than those with crooked
legs; ears shorter, but broader, and very soft usually; neck, a shade
longer; stern carried straight up; good loins; shorter bodies, very level
from shoulder to rump. Whereas the other two breeds are invariably a
shade lower at shoulder than at the stern. Some show the os occipitis well
marked; others are more apple-headed ; the hair is coarse on the stern, the
feet are straight and compact, knees well placed, thighs muscular and well
proportioned; in short, they are an elegant looking, dashing, and rather
taking breed as a lot. But in work there is a world of difference. The
crooked-legged ones go slow and sure, the straight-legged ones run into
the defect of fast hounds, i.e., they go too fast occasionally for their
noses ; they are not either quite so free from riot; but wherever pretty
fast work is required, and when the covert requires some doing in the
way of jumping drains and scrambling over boulders, &e., then they will
carry the day. They are chiefly used for large game in pretty large
coverts, and run in small packs. For fast fun, exercise, and music they
will do; but for actual shooting commend me to the basset ajambes torses.
With such a little hound, if he knows you and understands your ways,
you are bound to bag, and alone he will do the work of ten ordinary
hounds, and, in truth, there are few things more exciting to the sports-
man than to hear his lonely crooked-legged companion merrily, slowly,
but surely, bringing his quarry to his gun. Some of the pleasantest
moments of my life have been thus spent; and once, having shot two
wolves that had been led out to me by a basset d jambes torses, I fairly
lifted up the little beggar to my breast and hugged him, and I called him
a pet and a dear, and all that sort of bosh, and I thought that in all my
life I had never seen a pluckier and cleverer little fellow.

“ In short, there is no doubt that for purposes of shooting, bassets, of
whatever breeds, are pre-eminently excellent. They run very true, and
are more easily taught the tricks of game than full-sized hounds. This I
have found out by experience. The average large hound, once in
full swing on a scent, runs on like a donkey. But bassets seem to
reason, and when they come to an imbroglio of tracks, purposely left by﻿The Basset.

89

the quarry to puzzle them, they are rarely taken in ; but, slowly and
patiently setting to work, they unravel the maze, and eventually pick up
again the wily customer’s scent. Hence, for the man who can only keep
one or two hounds to be used with the gun, there is no breed likely to
suit him better than bassets, for they are sure not to lose the scent,
whatever takes place, and their low size enables them to pick it up when
it is so cold that a larger hound would, perhaps, not even notice it.

“ They have also a good deal of plnck, to which they add a sort of
reasoning discretion. To illustrate my meaning, I will give an instance
to the point, viz., very few hounds of any kind take readily to hunting
wolves, and when they do take to it they hnnt in a pack, each hound
countenancing the other. Now, some well-bred bassets will hunt a wolf
singly. I have stated already that I have had myself the pleasure of
killing two wolves that were, individually, hunted by one basset. This,
therefore, shows extraordinary pluck on the part of the little hound ; for,
be it known that, as a rule, any hound or dog who comes for the first
time on the scent of a wolf forthwith bolts home, or hides behind his
master for protection. On the other hand, bassets are cautious. When
they by chance come near a wolf, or a wild boar, or a stag, or any other
wild animal on whom they could make but little impression, but who is,
on the other hand, likely to do them an irretrievable injury, they never
run the risk, but bay at him from a distance. As long as he chooses to
stop they will not leave him ; they will resume hunting him as soon as
he will start, but they will only run at him when the decisive shot has
been fired.

“ Some bassets are used for vermin killing (badger, fox, &c.) ; others
are employed for pheasant shooting, woodcock shooting, and partridge
shooting, besides their legitimate employment in hunting ground game.
When used for birds they are frequently called to, to keep them within
range, and, generally, a bell or small brass grelot is fastened to their
collar, that the shooter may know where they are. Some men make
their bassets retrieve, even from water ; and most bassets will go to
ground readily to fox or badger.

“ Finally, some peasants use their extraordinary powers of scent to find
truffles. Their training for that sort of business is wonderfully simple.
The hound, when young, is kept a day without food, and a truffle being
shown to him, the peasant throws it into some small covert, or hides it in﻿go

British Dogs.

stones, or buries it lightly in the ground, and makes the dog .find it.
When he has done so, he gives him a piece of bread. This sort of thing
being repeated until the basset looks readily for the truffle, he is then
taken to those places in the neighbourhood of which truffles are known
or suspected to be, and the peasant, pretending to throw away the usual
truffle, tells the dog, “ Cherche! cherche! ” (seek ! seek !) whereupon the
little hound, diligently ferreting about the ground, soon comes upon a
truffle scent, and begins digging for it. At the first sign of that process
the peasant relieves him and digs out the precious tubercle, and so on.
There are some other species of dogs also used for that sort of work;
but the basset, owing to his acute power of scent, is mostly preferred by
the professional chercheurs de truffes. Some of these men, however, use
pigs for the purpose.

“ Concerning those French bassets which have from time to time been
exhibited at our shows, some of them have shown fair points, but none
of them have had the very long ears which one will notice with the
bassets in the foresters’ kennels on the Continent. Moreover, in the
classes set aside for bassets, I do not remember having seen a good basset
d jambes torses, though there were one or two fair specimens of half-
crooked, and straight-legged bassets. If my memory serves me right,
the Earl of Onslow’s were straight-legged, half rough-coated bassets,
with remarkably short ears. Mr. Millais’ Model was a black, white,
and tan smooth-coated basset, with very fair properties—the best I had
seen in England, so far, and a Yendean basset was a regular griffon; I
forget now the state of his legs, but his coat was just the sort of jacket
for the rough woods of Brittany and Vendee.

“ On the other hand, in the classes for dachshunds, I have seen some
first-rate black and tan, and also red, bassets d jambes torses, all smooth-
coated. No doubt, eventually, classes will be set apart for each individual
breed, and in such a case there is a very fine field yet open for an enter-
prising exhibitor wishing to produce bassets in open court.”

Measurements, &c., of celebrated French Bassets :

The Earl of Onslow’s Nestor : Age, 2 years 10 months ; weight, 391b. ;
height at shoulder, 14in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 36in. ;
length of tail, 12in.; girth of chest, 24in.; girth of loin, 22in. ; girth of
head, 15£in.; girth of forearm, 6£in.; length of head from occiput to tip
of nose, 9in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 9in.﻿﻿’d by Mr.﻿The Dachshund.

9i

The Earl of Onslow’s Fino : Age, 3 years 8 months ; weight, 391b.;
height at shoulder, 13in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 33in. ; length
of tail, llin. ; girth of chest, 24in. ; girth of loin, 23in.; girth of head,
16£in. ; girth of forearm, 6in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
10in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip, of nose, 8£in.

Mr. Everette Millais’ Model: Age, 7£ years ; weight, 461b.; height at
shoulder, 12in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 32in. ; length of tail,
ll^in. ; girth of chest, 25in.; girth of loin, 21in. ; girth of head, 17in. ;
girth of forearm, 6£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9in. ;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 92in.; length of
ears from tip to tip, 19in. ; height from ground, forefeet, 2fin.

Mr. Everette Millais’ Garrenne: Age, 2£ years ; weight, 301b.; height
at shoulder, 9£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 29in.; length of
tail, 9in. ; girth of chest, 20in.; girth of loin, 16in. ; girth of head,
13in.; girth of forearm, 5in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
8in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in.; length
of ears from tip to tip, I7in.; height from ground, forefeet, 2£in.

Chapter XV.—THE; DACHSHUND.

By Vert.

To “ Vert ” as a sportsman we have already alluded in the preface to
his artiole on Foxhounds, and we need only Bay here that his large
experience of Dachshunds entitles his opinions on the breed to be
considered authoritative. He writes :

“ So much has been said and written on this breed of dogs during the
few years that they have had a place in the prize schedules of our shows,
that in treating the subject we shall endeavour to unsay some of the
nonsense that has from time to time been put forth by some of those
journals whose pages are opened to the discussion of oanine matters, in
one of whioh a certain amusing correspondent, in a playful moment, tells﻿92

British Dogs.

his readers that the ears of the dachshund cannot be too long. Another
says the body cannot be too long. Then we read that the legs cannot be
too short or too crooked, with such impossible measurements as could
only be found in the fertile brain of the writer. At shows we have had
our special attention drawn to the veriest mongrels, and been held by
the button by enthusiastic owners, and had glaring defects pointed out as
characteristics of the pure breed; but being unable to draw on our
credulity to that extent, we have had to fall back on our stock of charity,
and call to mind that even Solomon was young once in his lifetime.
There is no breed of dogs that the English have been so tardy in taking
to as the dachshund, Satan and Eeldmann being the only representatives
of the breed on the Birmingham show bench for several years ; and
certainly we had one judge that had the courage to grapple which this
little hound when he did make an attempt to emerge from his obscurity,
and we have seen the best dachshund that has yet been exhibited passed
over by a couple of “ all-round ” judges of high standing at an important
show, one of those Solons arguing that he was a beagle otter hound, and
the other that he was a turnspit, neither of them being aware that the
turnspit was little different from a moderate crooked-legged pug of the
present time, and that it would be impossible to confine a long-backed
twenty pound dog in one of those small cages in which the little prisoner
had to ply his calling. We have no wish to speculate on the early history
of this breed, as, like other cases, it would be a mere leap in the dark
from the same source as before alluded to. We have been seriously told
that the breed came originally from France, and that once on a time,
when the French army invaded Germany and were capturing towns and
provinces, the German nobles, by way of retaliation, invaded France and
carried off all the dachshunds; but, as we do not find this theory sup-
ported by any authority that we have consulted, possibly the writer of the
story may be entitled to the invention also.

“ The dachshund is a short-coated, long-backed dog, on very short legs,
of about 201b. weight, and should not be less than 181b., the bitches being
31b. or 41b. less than the dogs. They must be self-coloured, although
a little white on the breast or toes should not be a disqualification, as
these beauty spots will crop out now and then in any breed of dogs.

“ The colour most in fashion just now is the fallow red and black and
tan, but we have very good specimens of various shades of red, more or﻿The Dachshund.

93

less smutty, as well as the brown with tawny markings, some of which
are very handsome. In black and tan we do not demand pencilled toes,
as in the terrier, although, if good in every other respect, we should con-
sider it an acquisition; but we prefer such as nearest approach the
standard of excellence, and care little for shades of colour, so that it
be any of these above-named. The head, when of the proper type,
greatly resembles that of the bloodhound. The ears also are long and
pendulous, and in a 201b. dog should measure from 4£in. to 5in. each, and
from tip to tip over the cranium, when hanging down in their natural
position, from 13in. to 14in.; the length from the eye to the end of the
nose should be over 3in., 3£in. being a good length for a dog of 201b.
weight; girth of muzzle from 8in. to 8£in., which should finish square, and
not snipey or spigot-nosed, and the flews should be fairly developed ; the
eyes should be very lustrous and mild in expression, varying in colour
with that of the coat; the teeth should be very strong and perfectly
sound, as a dog with a diseased mouth is of little use for work, is very
objectionable as a companion, and is quite unfit for the stud in this or any
other breed of dogs ; the neck should be rather long, and very muscular.
We have a brood bitch from one of the best kennels in Germany, in which
the dewlap is very strongly pronounced; but this and the conical head
are but rarely met with as yet. The chest should be broad, with the
brisket point well up to the throat; the shoulders should be very loose,
giving the chest an appearanoe of hanging between them ; they should be
well covered with muscle, with plenty of loose skin about them. The
fore legs are one of the great peculiarities of the breed ; these are very
large in bone for the size of the dog, and very crooked, being turned out
at the eldows and in at the knees ; the knees, however, should not
‘ knuckle,’ or stand forward over the ankles, as we frequently see in
very crooked-legged dogs, whioh render them more clumsy and less
powerful. The feet Bhould be very large, and armed with strong claws,
and should be well splayed outwards to enable him to dear his way in the
burrow. Terrier-like fore feet cannot be tolerated in the dachshund, as
great Bpeed is not required, the great essentials being a good nose, for
tracking ; a conformation of body that will admit of his entering the
badger earth, and adapting himself to his situation ; and a lion heart and
power to grapple with the quarry, in the earth or the open; and these
are no Bmall requirements. We are frequently told so-and-so’B terrier﻿94

British Dogs.

has finished his badger in some, very small numbers of minutes. But
there are badgers and badgers—baby badgers ; and if we are to believe a
tithe of what we hear on this head, the supposition is forced upon us that
a great many badgers die in their infancy.

“We do know that the premier dachshund of the present day has
within the last two months drawn a wild fox from his fastness and finished
him, unaided, in about four minutes ; but an unsnubbed, fully-matured
badger of five or six summers is an awkward customer, and with him the
result might have been quite different.

“What are called dachshunds may be picked up in most German
towns, but those are often of an inferior sort, or half-breds, the genuine
blue blood being almost entirely in the hands of the nobles. Familiar to
us in the north were those of the late King of Hanover ; those of Baron
Nathasius and Baron Yon Cram in the south. The Grand Duke of Baden’s
kennel at Eberstein Schloss is unrivalled. Prince Couza, Baroness Ingel-
heim, and Baron Haber also possessed some of the best and purest strains.

“ In England, Her Majesty the Queen and H.I.H. Prince Edward of
Saxe-Weimar have for many years possessed the choicest specimens of the
best strains in Germany ; and we have been favoured with stud dogs and
brood from some of the above-named kennel, which required some-
thing more than gold to possess them. A habit has sprung up of late, and
a very bad one it is, of entering rough-coated little dogs as dachshunds
at some of our best shows, and some of them have received honours which
they are in no way entitled to. This is misleading, as they are not dachs-
hunds, but ‘ bassets, ’ very nice little fellows, but with no more right to
be exhibited as dachshunds than a setter or a spaniel would have in a
pointer class. They may be half-breds, as dachshund-basset or dach-
shund-spaniel ; we have also met with others, hound marked and smooth-
coated, which looked like dachshund-beagle; these are all bassets, a
term applied by the French to all low, short-legged dogs. The best we
have met with were a leash owned by a French marquis; these had grand
heads of the otter hound type, with rough coats, very long bodies, and
short crooked legs, and were called ‘Eostaing bassets,’ and were
excellent workers in thick coverts, but they rarely possess either the
courage or the scenting powers of the dachshund.”

Between the points translated from, the German by Her Von Schmie-
denburg, editor of “ Der Hund,” and the English view, as given by﻿The Dachshund.

95

“ Stonehenge ” in “ Dogs of the British Islands,” there is some
difference, and as “ Stonehenge ” acknowledges the assistance in
drawing up the description of points of three German gentlemen and at
leaBt two Englishmen of long experience in Germany, this is the more
remarkable. These gentlemen were Prince Albert Solms, Mr. Schuller
(who has imported a great number of the best dachshunds seen in this
country), Mr. Schweitzer, Mr. Percival de Castro, Mr. Fisher, and Mr.
Barclay Hanbury.

Of the skull “Stonehenge” says, “the occiput wide and its protu-
berance well developed,”—the German description ignoring an occipital
protuberance, and indeed seeming to be in contradiction of its existence ;
indeed conical heads are distinctly declared faulty.

Of the ears “ Stonehenge” says, “long enough to reach nearly to the
tip of the nose, .... hanging back in graceful folds.” By German
breeders at Hanover show, 1879, we were assured they do not like the
ears to come much over the angle of the jaws.

Of the eye “ Stonehenge” says, “rather small, piercing, and deeply
set ” against “ medium size, round, neither protruding nor sunken.”

Neok “somewhat short, thick,” against “long, flexible, broad, and
strong.”

The German description is silent as to size, but this we have remedied
by the aotual measurements of well known dogs, which we give at the
end of the chapter.

The following are the points of the dachshund, as drawn up by a
council of the Hanover Kennel Club, composed of many of the leading
German breeders :

1.	General Appearance.—Low and very long in structure, the fore part
(not only the chest) especially well developed, legs very short, the fore
legs turned inward at the knees, but the feet considerably bent out.
The whole appearance is weasel-like ; the tail is moderately bent, and is
oarried very little above a horizontal line, or else downwards. Hair close,
short, smooth. Expression intelligent, attentive, and lively.

2.	Head.—Somewhat long, tapering towards the nose, wedge-like,
broadest at the hind part of the skull, and without a stop ; skull broad,
almost flat; nose narrow, straight, sometimes a little upward-bent; lips
very little hanging, forming a small fold at the oorner of the mouth.

3.	Ears of medium length, tolerably broad, and rounded at the end,﻿96

British Dogs.

which is less broad than other part. The ear is placed high up and well
backward, so that the space between ear and eye appears considerably
larger than with other hunting dogs. The ears are not wrinkled, but
hang down close at the cheeks.

4.	The Eye is of medium size, round, neither protruding nor sunken in
(klar vorliegand, i.e., well visible when seen from the side), and very
sharp in expression.

5.	Neck.—Long, flexible, broad, and strong; the skin somewhat Ioobo
in front.

6.	Bach.—Very long, slanting towards the tail; loins well developed.

7.	Breast.—Broad, framework of ribs long and deep, the flanks drawn in.

8.	Tail of medium length, strong at the root, and tapering to a thin
end ; almost straight, and oarried as said above.

9.	Fore Legs.—Muscles stronger than at the hind feet; the shoulders
very muscular, upper arm short and strong, bending outwards ; the
knees bent inwards, the feet again outwards. The legs seen in the
profile must appear straight, not hanging over in the knees.

10.	Hind Legs.—Straighter than with other dogs, seen from behind
almost straight; the quarters have muscles well visible, almost pointing
out (eikig), the bone from hock to pastern very short.

11.	Feet.—The feet of the fore legs are more muscular than those of
the hind legs, the toes well closed, with nails strongly curved and black ;
the sole of the feet is broad and thick. The toes of the hind legs are
shorter and straighter, the feet also smaller.

12.	Ha/ir.—Short, close, and glossy, not soft, but resisting to the touoh
(mit stechender Spitze) when stroking against it; very fine and close at
the ears, coarser and longer at the lower side of the tail, but here also
lying close to the skin. On the belly the hair is a little coarser, and the
skin well covered.

13.	Golowr.—Black, with tan at head, breast, front of neck, belly, legs,
and under the tail; also dark brown, golden brown, hair grey with
darker stripe on the back : as also ash grey, silver grey with dark patches
(Tigerdachs). The darker colours are mostly united with tan markings ;
with lighter colours the nails ought also to be black, and the eyes always
dark. Any white is only to be endured as a small mark at the ohest.

14.	Teeth.—Upper and lower teeth meet exactly; in proportion to the jaws
they are stronger than with any other breed, especially the comer teeth.﻿The Dachshund.

97

As faulty are considered dogs who have a compressed or conical head;
the mnzzle too short, too broad, or with a stop at forehead; when the
lips are hanging ; the ears folded, or not hanging close ; when the fore
legs are so crooked that the knees touch each other, or are unable to bear
the weight of the body; when the neck is thin and the breast too narrow;
when the fore feet are too much, or irregularly turned outward, when the
knee joint is weak and the toes spread out; also when the bone from the
hock downward is too long and the hocks too close together. The tail is
bad if it is crooked or has long hair sticking out. Any white as principal
colour is also faulty.

Measurements and weights of celebrated dachshunds :

Mr. J. Hanson Lewis’s Uhlan (K.C.S.B., 6333) : Age, 3 years; weight,
221b.; height at shoulder, 8£in.; length from nose to set on of tail,
27in. ; length of tail, 9in.; girth of chest, 21in.; girth of loin, 10£in. ;
girth of head, 13in. ; girth of forearm, 4fin.; length of head from occiput
to tip of nose, 7iin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 6$in.

Mr. J. Temperley’s Waldine (K.C.S.B., 6355) : Age, 5 years; weight,
23&lb.; height at shoulder, 10£in.; length from nose to set on of tail,
30£in.; length of tail, lO^in. ; girth of chest, 20in.; girth of loin, 18^in.;
girth of head, 13£in.; girth of forearm, 4fin.; length of head from occiput
to tip of nose, 8£in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip
of nose, 7£in. ; length of ear, 6£in.

Capt. Donald Shaw’s Olga (K.C.S.B., 7416) : Age, 4£ years ; weight,
191b. ; height at shoulder, 9fin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 31in.;
length of tail, 9£in. ; girth of chest, 19in.; girth of loin, 17fin. ; girth
of head, 12in.; girth of forearm, 5in. ; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, 8in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
noBe, 7in. ; length of ear, 6in.

Mr. W. Arkwright’s Xamerl (K.C.S.B., 6337) : Age, 3£ years; weight,
18£lb. ; height at shoulder, lOfin.; length from nose to set on of tail,
29$in.; length of tail, llin.; girth of chest, 19£in.; girth of loin, 15fin.;
girth of head, 13in.; girth of forearm, 5in. ; length of head from oooiput
to tip of nose, 8in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
7in.; length of ear, 6in.

Mr. W. Arkwright’s Benta (K.C.S.B., 8401) : Age, 1£ years ; weight,
191b.; height at shoulder, 9fin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 31in.;﻿98

British Dogs.

length of tail, lOin.; girth of chest, 20in. ; girth of loin, 15$in.; girth
of head, 12£in.; girth of forearm, 5in.; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, 8in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 7£in. ; length of ear, 7|in.

Mr. C. Goas’s Tech Age, 2 years; weight, 22£lb.; height at shoulder,
10£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 29in. ; length of tail, llin.;
girth of chest, 20in.; girth of loin, 16in.; girth of head, 13iin.; girth of
forearm, 6^-in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 8in.; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7iin.; width of skull,
4£in.; length of muzzle, 4in.

Mr. H. Jones’s Zamge : Age, nearly 2 years ; weight, 13£lb.; height at
shoulder, 9in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 26fin.; length of tail,
8in.; girth of chest, 16|rn.; girth of loin, 13&in. ; girth of head, 10|in. ;
girth of forearm, measured lin. above elbow, 5fin.; length of head from
occiput to tip of nose, 7iin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 5£in.; colour and markings, red ; girth of leg, measured lin.
below elbow, 4£in. ; sex, bitch.

Mr. H. Jones’s Blitz-. Age, 9 months; weight, 131b.; height at
shoulder, 8fin. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 25fin.; length
of tail, 8£in.; girth of chest, 16in.; girth of loin, 13Jin. ; girth
of head, lOfin.; girth of forearm, measured lin. above elbow,
5$in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 7gin.; girth of
muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 5£in. ; colour and
markings, black and tan ; girth of leg, measured lin. below elbow, 4fin.;
sex, bitch.

Mr. H. Jones’s Waldine : Age, over 2 years ; weight, 131b. ; height at
shoulder, 9in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 25in.; tail, injured ;
girth of chest, 16£in.; girth of loin, 13£in.; girth of head, 10£in. ; girth
of arm, measured lin. above elbow, 5£in.; girth of leg, measured lin.
below elbow, 4£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 6£in.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 5fin.; colour and
markings, black and tan; sex, bitch.

Mr. H. Jones’s Barbaroftma Age, 4 years ; weight, 161b. ; height at
shoulder, 8gin. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 29fin.; length of
tail, 8£in.; girth of chest, 18£in.; girth of loin, 14in. ; girth of head,
ll^in.; girth of arm, measured lin. above elbow, 5£in. ; girth of leg,
measured lin. below elbow, 4fin.; length of head from occiput to tip of﻿The Dachshund.

99

nose, 7in. ; length of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 6fin.;
colour and markings, red ; sex, bitch.

Mr. H. Jones’s Waldmann I. (K.C.S.B., 6335) : Age, 4 years ; weight,
16^1b.; height at shoulder, 10£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail,
27fin.; length of tail, 8|in. ; girth of chest, 18£in. ; girth of loin, 15£in.;
girth of head, 12£in.; girth of arm, measured lin. above elbow, 6£in.;
girth of leg, measured lin. below elbow, 5|in.; length of head from
occiput to tip of nose, 7fin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 6£in. ; colour and markings, black and tan ; sex, dog.

Mr. H. Jones’s Waldmarm II. : Age, about 3 years; weight, 17£lb. ;
height at shoulder, 9fin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 29£in. ;
length of tail, 9£in.; girth of chest, 18in. ; girth of loin, 15fin.; girth
of head, llfin. ; girth of arm, measured lin. above elbow, 6fin.; girth of
leg, measured lin. below elbow, 4fin.; length of head from occiput to tip
of nose, 7fin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
6|in.; colour and markings, black and tan ; sex, dog.

Mr. H. Jones’s Bonner (K.C.S.B., 8377) : Age, about 2 years; weight,
161b. 6oz.; height at shoulder, 9£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail,
26&in.; length of tail, lOin. ; girth of chest, 17in.; girth of loin, 14£in.;
girth	of head,	13in. ; girth of arm, measured lin. above	elbow, 5fin. ;

girth	of leg, measured lin.	below elbow, 4in.; length	of head from

oooiput to tip of nose, 7£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyeB and
tip of nose, 6fin.; colour and markings, black and tan.

Miss M. J. Bell’s Faust: Age, 16 months; weight, 251b. 10£oz.;
height at shoulder, 10£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 32£in. ;
length of tail,	lljin.; girth	of chest, 20£in. ; girth of	loin, 17£in.;

girth	of head,	13in.; girth	of forearm, 5Jin.; length	of head from

occiput to tip of nose, 8£in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes
and tip of nose, 6£in.; from point to point of ears, 14£in. ; colour, black
and tan.

Miss M. J. Bell’s Waldvne : Age, about 3 years; weight, 171b.;
height at shoulder, 9£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 28in. ;
length of tail, lOin.; girth of chest, 17in.; girth of loin, 14in.; girth of
head, ll£in. ; girth of forearm, 5iin. ; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, 7£in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
6in. ; from point to point of ears, 13in.; colour, black and tan.

Miss M. J. Bell’s Bessauer: Age, about 6 years ; weight, 241b.; height

II 2﻿100

British Dogs.

at shoulder, lOjin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 32£in. ; length of
tail, lOin.; girth of chest, 20in. ; girth of loin, 16in. ; girth of head,
13in. ; girth of forearm, 6£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
8jin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in.; from
point to point of ears, 15jin. ; colour, black and tan.

Miss M. J. Bell’s Frida: Age, 1 year 4 months ; weight, 141b. ; height
at Bhoulder, 9£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 29in.; length of
tail, lOin. ; girth of chest, 17£in. ; girth of loin, 13^in. ; girth of head,
ll£in.; girth of forearm, 5in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
7ain.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 5fin.; from
point to point of ears, 13£in.; colour, black and tan.

Mrs. Douglas Murray’s Von JosstiJc: Age, 4£ years ; weight, 17flb.;
height at shoulder, 9£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 2ft. 3in.;
length of tail, 9in.; girth of chest, 1ft. 5£in. ; girth of loin, 1ft. lin. ; girth
of head, 1ft. l£in.; girth of arm, measured lin. above elbow, 7in.; girth
of leg, measured lin. below elbow, 4in. ; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, 72in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
8in.; colour and markings, red.

Mrs. Douglas Murray’s Von : Age, 1 year and 9 months ; weight,
18£Lb. ; height at shoulder, 9£in.; length from nose to set on of tail,
2ft. 3in.; length of tail, 9in. ; girth of chest, 1ft. 5fin. ; girth of loin,
lft.; girth of head, 1ft. l£in. ; girth of arm, measured lin. above elbow,
9in.; girth of leg, measured lin. below elbow, 4£in. ; length of head from
occiput to tip of nose, 7in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 72in.; colour and markings, red, white spot on chest.

Mr. Montague Wootten’s Zigzag (K.C.S.B., 8393) : Age, 1 year
5 months ; weight, 21£lb.; height at shoulder, ll£in.; length from nose
to set on of tail, 31in. ; length of tail, ll^in.; girth of chest, 19£in.;
girth of loin, 17in. ; girth of head, 13£in.; girth of forearm, 5fin. ;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 8iin.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 6jin. ; length of ear from root to tip, 5|in. ;
colour, blood red, red nose ; breeder, owner.

Mr. Montague Wootten’s Zcunah (K.C.S.B., 8404) : Age, 1 year
8 months ; weight, 201b.; height at Bhoulder, 11 in.; length from nose to
set on of tail, 29in.; length of tail, llin. ; girth of chest, 19in.; girth
of loin, 16in. ; girth of head, 13£in.; girth of forearm, 5£in.; length
of head from occiput to tip of noBe, 7£in. ; girth of muzzle midway﻿The Schweisshund.

IOI

between eyes and tip of nose, 6£in.; length of ear from root to tip,
5|in.; colour, red, white fore feet, black nose; breeder, W. Arkwright;
she is own sister to Senta (K.C.S.B., 8401).

Chapter XVI.—THE SCHWEISSHUND.

By Corsincon.

This is a German hound which will, when better known in England,
find a place in our shows. They are about the size of our larger fox-
hounds. I had the opportunity of seeing a large class of them at the
Hanover Show, 1879, about sixty competing at that exhibition, when
they attracted the attention of the numerous English visitors.

The schweisshund corresponds with what was once known here as the
lyme hound, or lymer, as far as work is concerned, for it is impossible
now to fix accurately the points of a dog long since modified or absorbed
in higher types, a process which has so long gone on in this country.
The schweisshund has a great reputation at home for aptitude and per-
severance in his special work of tracking wounded deer. The type of
head is different from our bloodhound, the occipital protuberance is not
very pronounced; there is an absence of “ frown,” insisted on as one of
the evidences of great scenting powers by a few bloodhound fanciers
here, yet these schweisshunds are marvellously clever on the coldest
scent. They are shorter in the muzzle proportionately to size than
our bloodhounds or even foxhounds, flatter in the skull, with little
flew or dewlap. The colour is generally a red or a red brindle, from
whioh I imagine them to be more nearly related to the immense boar-
hound of Germany than to any of our hounds. The following are the
points required by German breeders and sportsmen :

1.	General Appeara/nce.—Medium height, of strong and long structure,
high in the back head, tail rarely oarried high, earnest expression of the
face.

2.	Head of middling size, the upper part broad and flat, the forehead﻿102

British Dogs.

slightly wrinkled, the hind part of the head is moderately expressed.
Nose broader than in other breeds of hounds, may be black or red. The
bridge of the nose under the eyes is small or drawn in, almost arched.
The eyebrows are considerable developed and protruding. Nose round,
and lips falling over in the comer of the mouth.

3.	Ears tolerably long, very broad, rounded at the ends, high, and
equally set out, always lying close.

4.	Eyes clear, with energetic expression, no red observable.

5.	Neck long and strong, enlarging towards the chest.

6.	Back rather long, sunk behind the shoulders, hind part broad, and
slightly vaulted and sloping.

7.	Breast wide, ribs deep and long, back gradually sloping up behind.

8.	Tail long and well provided with hair.

9.	Fore legs stronger than the hind legs, shoulders sloping, very loose
and movable ; the muscles of the shoulders are well developed.

10.	Hi/nd legs moderately well developed, the lower parts not quite
straight.

11.	Feet strong, round, and closed toes. Nails, strong, uneven; the
sole of the foot is strong and large.

12.	Coat close and full, smooth and elastic, almost glossy.

13.	Colour grey-brown, like the winter coat of deer ; dark brown on
muzzle ; eyes and tail red-brown, or red-yellow, or brown intermixed
with black, and marked mostly with the darker oolour on the eyes,
nose, and tail, and with dark marks on the back.

Those dogs are considered as faulty which have a small high skull, narrow
nose, running in the same dimension toward the forehead ; if the ears are
too long, too narrow, and too pointed ; if the legs are bent, too short, or too
thin, or strongly bent and too high carried tail; as also the structure, if
not in correspondence with the different parts of the body. As regards
colour, white and also yellow marks, must be considered faulty.﻿﻿﻿GROUP III

Dogs that find their Game by scent, and index
it for the advantage of the Gun.

Including :

1.	The English Setter,

2.	The Irish Setter.

j. The Gordon or Black
and Tan Setter.

4.	The Spanish Pointer.

5.	The Pointer.

6.	The Dropper.

This group corresponds sufficiently closely with
Group II. in head formation to come also into the
second division in the arrangement of M. Cuvier.
Speaking broadly and generally, the head and muzzle
of the modern varieties included in this group are
slightly more elongated than the dogs embraced in
Group II., with the exception of the bloodhounds.
Setters are undoubtedly more closely allied to spaniels
than to pointers, and naturalists would group the two
former together and the pointers with the hounds, but
the system of classification which for convenience I
have adopted leaves no option but to place setters and
pointers together, as the work they do and the manner
of doing it are in strong accord.

		
Chapter XVII.—THE ENGLISH SETTER.

By Corsincon.

Difficult as it admittedly is to trace the history of any of our modern
breeds of dogs,' although, in most instanoes, their manufacture, if I may
use the term, into their present form is of comparatively recent date﻿io4

British Dogs.

there is, in respect to the setter, a general agreement among writers and
breeders that our present dog is largely derived from the spaniel; indeed,
the proofs of this are very conclusive—the family likeness is in many
respects yet strongly preserved, and in some kennels, where they have
kept pretty much to their own blood, following different lines from our
show and field trial breeders, this is most markedly so. No more
pronounced instance of this has come under my notice for years than a
number of dogs, all of the same blood, shown by the Earl of Carlisle and
other gentlemen at the Border Counties Show at Carlisle in January, 1877.
These were mostly liver and white in colour, stood higher than the show-
bench spaniel, shorter and rounder in the head than the present day
setter, but strong useful looking dogs, showing a lot of spaniel character
in general formation, carriage of ears, and coat and feathering, the coat
having a strong tendency to curl, and some of them showing as distinot
a topknot as the Irish water spaniel, although not so large. The writer on
setters in the “ Sportsman’s Cabinet,” 1802, tells ns that in his day, in
the northern connties, the pointer was called the smooth Bpaniel, the
setter the rough spaniel; and, although he speaks of this localism with
surprise as a misnomer, it was really the preservation of an old distinction,
the setters, or setting spaniels, being so named to divide them from their
congeners, used for different work, and named cockers and springers.
Our forefathers do not appear to have been so fastidious respecting the
appearance of their dogs as we are, but undoubtedly the spaniel was pre-
eminently their setting dog, both for use with the net and the gun.

In a much older book than the “ Sportsman’s Cabinet,” the “ Gentle-
man’s Recreation,” the writer gives the following directions how to
select a setting dog :	“ The dog which you elect for setting must have a

perfect and good scent, and be naturally addicted to the hunting of
feathers, and this dog may be either land spaniel, water spaniel, or
mongrel of them both, either the shallow-flewed hound, tumbler, lurcher,
or small bastard mastiff. But there is none better than the land spaniel,
being of a good and nimble size, rather small than gross, and of a
courageons mettle, which, thongh you cannot discern being young, yet
you may very well know from a right breed which have been known to be
strong, lusty, and nimble rangers, of active feet, wanton tails, and busy
nostrils, whose tail was without weariness, their search without change-
ableness, and whom no delight did transport beyond fear and obedience.”﻿The English Setter.

io5

Many other writers might be quoted to the same effect, and it is quite
clear that the old setter was simply a spaniel kept to certain work, and
as useful to the old sportsman who netted his covey of partridge as his
modem representative is to the present “shooter on the wing,” who is
content to bag his brace by a right and left from his patent breechloader.
Somerville, that thorough sportsman and true poet, gives a lucid and very
happy description of the working of the setter in the following lines :

When antnmn smiles, all beauteous in decay.

And paints each chequered grove with various hues,
My setter ranges in the new shorn fields,

His nose in air erect; from ridge to ridge,

Panting, he hounds, his quartered ground divides
In equal intervals, nor careless leaves
One inch untried. At length the tainted gale
His nostrils wide inhale, quick joy elates
His beating heart, which, awed by discipline
Severe, he dares not own, but cautious creeps
Low-cowering, step by step ; at last attains
His proper distance, there he stops at once,

And points with his instructive nose upon
The trembling prey. On wings of wind upborne
The floating net unfolded flies; then diops,

And the poor fluttering captives rise in vain.

These were the halcyon days of sport when driving, battues, and
mowing machines were alike unknown, and, rude as the appliances
for taking game were, they gave full play to the capabilities of a good
setter, the clever working of which gave such genuine pleasure to the
sportsman.

Whether the modern setter has been produced from the spaniel by care-
ful selection, or by a oross with the pointer or some other breed, it is
difficult to decide ; many have supposed the flat coat has been obtained
by a crosB, but selection would quite account for that, as well as the
ohaDge in formation.

Since the institution of dog shows and field trials a considerable impetus
has been given to dog breeding, and in the strife for fame none has been
so successful as the Laveracks, which, for elegance of outline, are unsur-
passed by any breed of dogs. These, and crosses from them, are now
pretty well Bpread over the country, and are also very fashionable in
America. Sam, late the property of Mr. W. Wardlaw Eeid, and the
subject of our engraving, waB a pure Laverack, brother to Mr. Purcell﻿io6

British Dogs.

Llewellyn’s Countess and Nellie, by Dash II. out of Moll III., and so going
back to Ponto and Old Moll. Sam was a dog showing great quality, and
with a good frame, free from the extreme delicacy of appearance whioh
not a few modern setters have ; and I am of opinion size and stoutness
are sometimes a little too much sacrificed to elegance.

Mr. Purcell Llewellyn now claims to have produced a distinct strain of
his own ; he has been unquestionably a large and successful breeder of
both good and handsome dogs, and his breed is now well known in the
United States of America, to which a great number of them have been
shipped as the “ Llewellyn setter.” The strain is founded on Laverack
blood, and has on more than one occasion given rise to discussions
which it would be unprofitable for us to enter upon here.

We find absolute purity of Laverack blood in Mr. T. B. Bower’s
Bandit, Mr. George Lowe’s Tam O’Shanter, in Mr. A. P. Heywood-
Lonsdale’s kennels, and a few others, but good and handsome setters
only part Laverack are plentiful enough.

The general appearance of a well bred setter is very pleasing to the
eye; he is so nicely put together as to present a well balanced whole,
showing capabilities of speed and endurance, and his expression shows a
high order of intelligence, combined with a diffidence and solicitude to
please, which courts attention and praise. He is in form rather long and
low, as compared with the pointer, but not so much so as either the
Clumber or the modern field spaniel, and is altogether of artistic shape ;
the elegance of form in which he excels most breeds being heightened by
the richness of his soft, wavy, silky coat, and profuse though not over-
abundant feathering.

The head should be rather lean and long, not so thick as the pointer’s,
being narrower between the ears, with plenty of brain room before them ;
the jaws should be long and level, the teeth meeting evenly, and these
should be strong and white—always an evidence of sound health which
should not be overlooked either in judging or in examining with a view
to purchase; little dip below the eyes ; the nose wide, slightly
raised, and rather spreading—any pinched appearance there gives a
terrier look ; the colour of the nose black, or dark liver for preference,
but it often varies with the colour of the dog, and in orange and lemon
marked is often flesh coloured; the lips should be clean cut—that is,
without flew, except a slight looseness or pouchiness at the angles.﻿The English Setter.

107

The eyes should be set straight, and be bright, clear, and animated;
they are of various shades of brown, differing according to the body
colour, and in orange and lemon marked dogs are sometimes amber or
almost yellow.

The ears,' of medium size, Bhould be set on low, fall straight, the
leather thin, and covered with fine silky hair, falling down as a fringe
from 2in. to 3in. below the leather.

The neck is elegant, sloping gently, with a good curve from the head,
and should be free from the tendency to bloodhound-like throatiness
sometimes seen in the Gordon setter ; the shoulders muscular and well
sloped, and with plenty of freedom of action ; chest deep, with the fore
ribs well sprung and the back ribs deep; the back stout, the backbone
well lined on each side with muscle, very slightly arched at the loins ;
thighs muscular, though rather flat, stifles wide and well bent, hocks
Btrong, and like the elbows, well let down ; the fore legs straight—these,
as well as the hind legs, well feathered ; cat-like feet are preferred, but
if too much so they are apt to be bare, and those with an inclination to
the hare foot are better protected with hair between the toes. The tail
should be of fair length, free from curl, but not dragged, asxsome setters
are seen to do ; the proper carriage shows a very gentle curve, and it is
well feathered with fine hair, longest about the middle, and tapering off
almost to a point. The ooatis of a soft, almost silky, texture, wavy, but
free from absolute ourl; longest in ears, fore legs, hams, and tail.

The colours are various, ranging from black, black and white, with
large patohes and flecked, called blue Beltons, red, orange or yellow and
white patched or flecked, and blaok and white, with a little tan, and pure
white. Some whites have a brownish-creamy oolour, with sprinklii gs of
dark hair, almost approaching to a roan.

Measurements, &c., of celebrated English setters :

Mr. A. P. Heywood-Lonsdale’s Fred V. : Age, 3 years ; weight, 511b.;
height at shoulder, 24in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 36in. ;
length of tail, 16in.; girth of chest, 28in.; girth of loin, 21£in.; girth of
head, 16in. ; girth of forearm, 6£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip
of nose, 13in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
lOin.

Mr. H. Prendergast-Garde’s Royal Dan: Weight, 401b. ; height
at Hhoulder, 22in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 38in. ; length of﻿io8

British Dogs.

tail, 12Jin.; girth of chest, 26in.; girth of loin, 19Jin. ; girth of head,
15Jin.; girth of forearm, 6Jin.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 8 Jin. ; girth of mnzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, lOin.

Mr. F. J. Staples-Browne’s Fancy : Age, 1 year 4 months; weight 46Jlb.;
height at shoulder, 22in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 3ft. ; length
of tail, 1ft. 5in.; girth of chest, 2ft. 2in. ; girth of loin, 1ft. 8in.; girth
of head, 1ft. 2 Jin. ; girth of forearm, 6 Jin.; length of head from occiput
to tip of nose, lOJin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 8Jin.

Mr. T. Webber’s Moll ITI. : Age, 1 year; weight, 471b.; height at
shoulder, 22in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 37in. ; length of
tail, 12Jin., girth of chest, 25in.; girth of loin, 21in. ; girth of head,
15 Jin.; girth of forearm, 6fin.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 9Jin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
8|in.

Mr. T. B. Bower’s Bandit: Age, 8 years; height at shoulder, 22in. ;
length from nose to set on of tail, 38in.; length of tail, 13Jin. ; girth
of chest, 28in. ; girth of loin, 23in.; girth of head, 16in. ; girth of fore-
arm, 7in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, lOJin.; girth of
muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, lOJin.; ears when extended
(measurement taken across the head), 17in.

Mr. T. B. Bower’s Blue Belle II. :	Weight, 401b.; height at

shoulder, 22in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 33in.; length of tail,
12 Jin.; girth of chest, 26in.; girth of loin, 20in. ; girth of head, 15in. ;
girth of arm lin. above elbow, lOJin. ; length of head from occiput to tip
of nose, 9in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
9 Jin.

Mr. J. BE. Salter’s Daisy: Age,4years; weight, 501b.; height at shoulder,
21in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 35in.; length of tail, 14in.;
girth of chest, 27in. ; girth of loin, 22in.; girth of head, 15in. ; girth of
forearm, 8in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 8Jin. ; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 9in.﻿﻿﻿The Irish Setter.

109

Chapter XVIII.—THE IRISH SETTER.

By Corsincon.

“A Veteran Sportsman,” author of “A Correct Delineation of the
Canine Race,” writing in 1803, says : “ The sporting gentlemen of
Ireland are more partial to setters than pointers, and probably they are
better adapted to that country. Setters, it is presumed, cover more
ground than pointers, are not so liable to be footsore, and can bear the
changes of weather much better than the latter, vhich they term the
smooth spaniel. The fields in many parts of Ireland are large, very
rugged, and stony ; the rains sudden, sharp, severe, and driving. Setters,
therefore, particularly suit the country they go over; to this may be
added the grouse shooting, which is excellent, and it is a universally-
received opinion that this species of dog only is equal to the fatigues of
it.” The writer I have quoted from does not attempt any description
of the setter in use in Ireland in his sporting days, nor dwell on his
points after the manner of our modem dog show critics; but, instead, he
gives briefly the fact that the dog selected by Irish sportsmen was one
specially adapted to the circumstances of the country and climate in which
he had to work, a most important fact, which I think dog show managers,
judges, and others cannot have too often brought under their notice, for
there is undoubtedly an evil tendency in our dog show system to forget
the fitness of the dog for his work, which should exist, and indeed should
be made a sine qud non, and to exalt far above their legitimate value,
points of beauty and arbitrary standards of perfection, giving undue
weight to matters of comparatively little moment, such as the existence of
a few dozen white hairs, more or less, the colour of the eyelashes, and the
precise carriage of the tail to a line minutely described and insisted on.
I by no meanB say that beauty and utility should not be combined, but
great care should be exercised that in setting up a fancy standard we
do not sacrifice to it absolutely essential or even desirable characteristics.
I for one have little faith in the fabulous pedigrees I hear of, and as little
in the assertions that a shade of colour is a proof of long descent in this
or any other breed. Such a thing as well kept stud books must, at least,﻿110

British Dogs.

have been rare indeed, as so far as I know there is not a dog living of any
breed whatever, if we except hounds, whose pedigree can be traced in a
manner that could be considered as proven for even one hundred years,
and it would still further mightily surprise me to find that the points of
all, or even one of the progenitors, had been as minutely described as
modern fanciers require. Hence, I fall back on general factB, and firmly
believe, with the writer I have quoted, that Irish sportsmen chose the
setter as best adapted to their purposes, and no one who has seen Irish
setters, especially as they are to be seen at Irish shows, will doubt that
the selection was a wise one, whether the originals were red or white and
red, for it is the general characteristic of both ; but I must say, to my mind
especially, of the reds, they impress one with their powers of hardihood
and endurance and defiance alike of rough country and rough weather;
they have a “ devil-may-care ” look about them which plainly says it is
neither hard work, hard weather, nor hard living that will stop us,
although at the same time this same look creates a suspicion, if not of
actual stubbornness, at least of a wilful rollicking disposition chary of
too close restraint.

Colour is the point which has been most warmly discussed since shows
were introduced, and, without going through the arguments and asser-
tions pro and con, I will merely observe that, so far, at least, as English
shows and English judges go, the deep blood-red, free from any black on
ears, ridge of back, or tail, and with as little white as possible—a mere
line down the face and star on chest—has gained the day, and any dog with
much white would in prize competition, judging from decisions of the last
few years, be very heavily handicapped, if not absolutely disqualified, and
I doubt very much if Dr. Stone’s grand old dog Dash were to visit the
scenes of his former triumphs, whether that “white snake round his
neck” would not mar his prospects. Our Irish friends provide distinct
classes for the reds and red and whites, they being two distinct types of
the Irish setter breed—a course highly to be approved; for, however
little faith may be placed in a vague tradition that would rest purity of
blood in a shade of colour, the very existence of such traditions proves
that such points had existed in good dogs, and had been consequently
noted and valued by old breeders. Speaking personally, I prefer the
blood red, with as little white as possible, as it gives to the dogs a more
distinct character, or rather it adds to their pronounced family character﻿The Irish Setter.

hi

and I can Bee no reason why such a point cannot be bred up to without a
sacrifice of higher and more essential qualities.

In general appearance the Irish setter is rather lighter and more wiry-
looking than the English. The head is long and narrow, the nose wide,
not snipey or terrier-like; the ears set on well back, rather narrow,
hanging close and lightly feathered; the eye should be brown, corre-
sponding with the dark flesh-coloured nose; the lips deep, but not so
much so as to be hound-like ; the neck neat, light, and well placed ; the
shoulders sloping; the chest deep, but not wide, as a wide chest indicates
slowness; the fore ribs deep, the sides rather flat, loins strong and very
musoular, and the flank rather tucked up ; hind quarters strong and
muscular, but not heavy ; the tail set on rather low and well oarried, fine
in bone, and the feathering rather lighter in colour than the body ; coat is
rather fine, but more wiry than an English setter ; the feather is longest
about the middle of the tail, tapering off gradually towards the point;
the legs straight, feet hare-like, and fairly feathered between the toes;
the hocks strong, stifles well bent; the feathering on the legs abundant,
fine in texture, and same shade as on the tail; the body coat is harder, of a
wet-resisting texture. Many of the Irish setters of the day can be traced
baok with more or less certainty to kennels of renown during the early
part of the century, and the number of good dogs, it is reasonable to assert,
has increased since the advent of shows gave an impetus to the breeding
of them; and now it is a rare thing to find an English show where this
breed is not represented. In the United States of America this dog is a
great favourite, almost as much so as the Laverack, and specimens are
constantly being sent across the Atlantic from Irish kennels. The most
celebrated dogs of this breed of recent date, which have been exhibited,
are Mr. Hilliard’s Palmerston, Dr. Kennedy’s Dick, Mr. Macdona’s
Plunket, Mr. Nuttall’s Maybe, Mr. M'Haflie’s Mina, Miss Lizzie War-
burton’s Lily, Dr. Stone’s Dash, Mr. Lipsoomb’s Shawn Bragh, Mr.
JephBon’s Dash, Major Hutchinson’s Bob, Major Cooper’s Banger, and
others too numerous to mention.

Among the most successful breeders I may mention Miss Warburton,
Mr. Ceoil Moore, Mr. Henry Jephson, and these and several other breeders
trace the pedigree of some of their dogs to the beginning of the present
century, going back through the kennels of Messrs. Evans and Lloyd, of
Dungarvan, to the kennels of Lords Antrim and Enniskillen and a noted﻿I 12

British Dogs.

breeder, Mr. Hazard, of Fermanagh.; and of other old strains there is the
La Tonche, Lord Clancarty’s, and the Marquis of Waterford’s. Mr.
Jephson was the breeder of Lilly II., Eily (both first prize winners at
Birmingham and Crystal Palace), Nell (second Crystal Palace), Sheelah
(ditto, 1876), March (champion cup, Dublin, 1875), Bufus (first puppy
class, Crystal Palace), and other good ones less well known.

The subject of our engraving is Mr. J. Fletcher’s Grouse, bred by Mr.
W. J. Smith. He made his debut at the Dublin Show, 1877, when he
took premier honours, and has since had a victorious career, having won
many prizes for his present owner under various judges. Grouse is a deep
red, with capital straight coat of the right texture, feathering on legs
profuse, nice comb-like flag, which he carries well; he has a good deep
chest, muscular loins, and good hind quarters, with a head almost
perfect.

The following are the measurements of some celebrated Irish setters :

Mr. J. H. Salter’s Whisper : Age, 2£ years ; weight, 561b. ; height at
shoulder, 25£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 42in.; length of tail,
19in. ; girth of chest, 28in.; girth of loin, 21in.; girth of head, 17in. ;
girth of arm, 7in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, lOin.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 9in.

Mr. T. Hilliard’s Palmerston: Age, 11 years; weight, 651b.; height
at shoulder, 23£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 44in.; length
of tail, 15in. ; girth of chest, 30in. ; girth of loin, 24in. ; girth of head,
16in. ; girth of arm, 9£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
10Jin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, lOin.

Mr. T. Hilliard’s Count: Age, 2 years 9 months; weight, 541b. ; height
at shoulder, 23in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 37£in. ; length of
tail, 13in. ; girth of chest, 28£in. ; girth of loin, 22in. ; girth of head,
15£in. ; girth of arm, lOin. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
9 2in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8£in.

Mr. T. Hilliard’s Tilly: Age, 4£ years; weight, 451b.; height at
shoulder, 22in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 37in.; length of tail,
14in.; girth of chest, 27in.; girth of loin, 20£in.; girth of head, 14iin.;
girth of arm, 8Jin.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9Jin.;
girth of mnzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8fin.

Mr. F. A. Bird’s Belle: Age, 3 years 3 months ; weight, 471b.; height
at shoulder, 22in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 35in.; length of﻿﻿w

£

Oh

o

p

0

£

P

O

Oh

W

H

H

W

c/)

£

O

P

Oh

O

0

m

m

0

m

=2

$

:i

I

$

&

X

£

3i

£

s

fcs

$

$﻿The Gordon or Black and Tan Setter.

“3

tail, 14in.; girth of chest, 28in.; girth of loin, 21in.; girth of head, 16in.;
girth of forearm, 7£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
lOin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, lOin.

Chapter XIX.—THE GORDON OR BLACK AND
TAN SETTER.

By Corsincon.

Whether the dog under consideration should be called the black and
tan setter or the Gordon setter is a subject open to controversy, but of
one thing there is no doubt, as the authentic records of breeders prove,
that many of the best modern black and tan setters have a large commix-
ture of that Gordon Castle blood which became half a century ago so
famous aB to stamp the generic name of Gordon Setters on its possessors.
What the original colour of the Gordon setter was is still a disputed point,
which was ably argued in the Field some years back, the weight of
evidence produced being decidedly against the black and tan and in
favour of the black, white, and tan, as the prevailing colours in this
celebrated kennel, but if it was difficult to get an unanimous consent as
to the colour of dogs distributed thenoe at comparatively so recent a date,
it becomes a still more difficult problem to solve how the breed was first
established. Many hold that it was originally a cross of our English
setter with the red Irish setter, and, in support of this view, advance the
fact that in many litters pure red puppies are met with. This does not
ooour so often now as we get further from the source of the red blood,
but it is fair presumptive evidence of the cross having taken place. On
the other hand, it has been asserted that many of the good qualities of
the Gordon Castle Better were inherited from a celebrated colley of poach-
ing proclivities ; and there are more unlikely things than that such a cross
might be tried, for no one, seeing the sagaoity of the sheepdog as dis-
played in his management of his oharge, can fail to be impressed by it, and if

I﻿British Dogs.

114

that wonderful sense could be infused into a setting dog and undesirable
points bred out whilst retaining it, it might be a consummation devoutly
to be wished. And such an attempt is far from unlikely to have been
tried, so that it is not at all improbable that the Gordon and our modem
black and tan have both Irish setter and colley blood in them. This
pre-supposes that the Irish setter has been longer in existence as a distinct
breed than the Gordon, and this, I think, can be established, although
that breed, like all others, has probably been considerably modified.

As it is generally—I may say universally—acceded that the spaniel is
the foundation on which all our varieties of setters has been built, and
there is no means of proving positively the modus operands, adopted, it is
a fair field for conjecture to those so disposed ; but one thing is clear, the
lines followed in breeding, whether as regards crossing or selection, must
have difEered to create three varieties with such distinctive features as
the English, Irish, and black and tan, and it is with the latter I have at
present to do, for, although I take black, white, and tan to have been the
prevailing colour of the Gordon, these have been elbowed off the show-
bench by their darker brethren for good or ill, for by all recent judging a
dog with a white frill even would stand no chance at shows where the
class is still described as black and tan, or Gordon setters, and under
these circumstances I think it a great pity that a class is not provided for
the handsome tri-coloured dog.

It is a fact worth noting that black and tan setters took the prizes against
all comers at the first two shows for setters ever held, these being Mr. J.
Jobling’s Dandy, first at Newcastle, 1859, and Mr. P. Burdett’s Brougham,
first at Birmingham in the November following. Dandy’s grandsire was
the Duke of Gordon’s Grouse, and both his stock and that of Brougham
have since frequently appeared in the prize lists.

As a working dog the black and tan is excellent; he is possessed of a fine
nose, with staunchness; he is not so fast as the Laverack, and in the
opinion of many, not so enduring, but on this latter point I have a different
opinion, having known dogs of this breed work constantly in rough hill
shooting without being knocked up, and for this kind of work his superior
bone and muscle seem to adapt him better than the lighter and more
elegant Laverack.

The black and tan differs from the English, and especially the Laveraoks,
in presenting a rather heavier appearance; the head is decidedly heavier,﻿The Gordon or Black and Tan Setter. 115

with a nearer approach to the bloodhound type, the lips in many good
specimens showing a good depth of flew, but in general points the two
varieties should agree, colour of course, excepted. This should be an
intense, yet brilliant black—not a dead absorbing black—relieved by a
very rich warm mahogany red, and as free from white as possible. This
deep tan could not be inherited from a oolley cross, the prevailing colours
in which are black and white, and those that are tan marked have that
colour very pale. The tan should appear clear and distinct on the feet,
feather of the leg, under the stern, on the vent, cheeks, lips, and in spots
over the eye, as in blaok and tan terriers.

As I do not believe in the wisdom, utility, or good taste of making a
decision in judging sporting classes depend so exclusively on colour and
markings, and consider it bad policy to exclude, as in this case, black, white,
and tan, which many think the legitimate colour of the breed, and prefer
both for beauty and work, I hope to see a class formed for them. There
might, after the damaging effects of show judging on them for years past,
be few exhibited at first, but in a few years this really handsome variety
of the setter would take a foremost place. It was some years after shows
were started that a class for fox terriers was instituted, and now they are
the most numerous at all shows.

The main points of difference between the black and tan and the
modern English setter, after colour, are that the former are heavier
built, larger in head (which is added to in appearance by tendency to
throatiness and flew), a rather harsher quality of coat, aud shorter stem.
The hind-quarters should be particularly strong, and the stifles wide
apart and well bent. A dog that appears tied in the hams, as toy
spaniels are, is of no use for work.

The subject of our engraving is Mr. H. B. Gibbs’ Young Lome,
one of the most perfect specimens of the breed. Young Lome has
not been much exhibited, but has been fairly successful, and his stock
have turned out well. He is also, I am given to understand, for I have
not seen him work, an excellent performer in the field.

Measurements of black and tan setters :

Mr. E. L. Parsons’ champion, Floss : Age, 5 years; weight, 591b.;
height at shoulder, 22 £in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 39in.;
length of tail, 15in. ; girth of chest, 27£in.; girth of loin, 22in.;
girth of head, 16in. ; girth of forearm, 6|in. ; length of head from

I 2﻿British Bogs.

116

occiput to tip of nose, 9£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 9jin.

Mr. J. H. Salter’s Bex II.: Age, 5 years ; weight, 71 Jib. ; height at
shoulder, 25in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 42in. ; length of tail,
18in. ; girth of chest. 32in.; girth of loin, 22in. ; girth of head, 18in. ;
girth of forearm, 8in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, lOin. ;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, llin.

Mr. T. Jacobs’ Marquis : Age, 2 years 3 months ; weight, 551b.; height
at shoulder, 22in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 38in. ; length
of tail, 14in. ; girth of chest, 29in.; girth of loin, 22£in.; girth of
head, 15£in.; girth of forearm, 7 Jin.; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, lOin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
9fcin. ; black and tan, correctly marked, free from white.

Mr. T. Jacobs’ Earl: Age, 2 years 3 months ; weight, 651b. ; height at
shoulder, 23£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 38£in.; length of
tail, 14in. ; girth of chest, 30£in.; girth of loin, 23£in. ; girth of head,
16£in.; girth of forearm, 8in.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, lO^in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
lOin.; colour and markings, black and tan, correctly marked, free from
white.

Mr. H. B. Gibbs’ Young Lome •. Age, about 5£ years ; weight, 611b.;
height at shoulder, 23in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 3ft. 5in. ;
length of tail, 1ft. 3in.; girth of chest, 30Jin.; girth of loin, 22£in, ;
girth of head, 1ft. 6in. ; girth of arm lin. above elbow, lOin. ; girth of
leg lin. below elbow, 8£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
llin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 10£in.;
colour and markings, black and rich sienna tan, correctly marked and
free from white.

Mr. H. B. Gibbs’ Norah : Age, about 3£ years ; weight, 471b. ; height
at shoulder, 21in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 2ft. lOin. ; length
of tail, 1ft. 2in. ; girth of chest, 2ft. 2jin.; girth of loin, 20£in.; girth
of head, 15£in. ; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 9in.; girth of leg
lin. below elbow, 8in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
9£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of noBe, 9in.;
colour and markings, black and tan of a rich sienna colour, oorrectly
marked and free from white.﻿﻿re Pax (.K.C.S.B. 935)—Dam Romp (K.C.S.B 4241﻿The Spanish Pointer—The Pointer.

117

Chapter XX.—THE SPANISH POINTER.

By Corsincon.

The old heavy lumbering Spanish pointer is said to be no more, at least,
in this country; but, judging from specimens we still see occasionally at
shows, he has not been entirely improved out of existence in the British
Isles. As the source of our far more elegaut, faster, and stauncher
pointer, we must speak of him with feelings of regret for the obsolete
that was useful in its day.

Compared with the modern English pointer, he was bigger, coarser,
and clumsier. Standing higher on the leg, his coarse head and badly
balanced body gave him an over-topped appearance. His feet were apt
to be flat and spreading, which added to his slowness ; but in nose he
exoelled, and to careful breeding from him the present pointers’ high
qualities in that respect are due. Close observers may still see in litters,
bred without the exercise of care and judgment, specimens with unknit
frames, unsymmetrioal build, and heavy chumpy heads—evidence of their
origin from a dog most useful in his day.

No detailed description of him is necessary, but we owe too much to
him altogether to ignore his existence and the influence he has had on
the modem race.

Chapter XXI.—THE POINTER.

By G. Thorpe-Bartram.

The pointer iB now, and has ever been, most essentially a sporting dog.
Although his origin is not quite clear, nor the country from which he
was imported into Eagland satisfactorily made out, still he is generally
credited with ooming to us from Spain. Even now we not unfrequently
hear the phrase, “That is a regular old-fashioned Spanish pointer,”
applied to a heavy, lumbering dog, suoh as was muoh used by our fore-﻿118	British Dogs.

fathers. If his footing upon British soil cannot be traced back so far as
the setter’s—or, at least, as the setter has existed amongst ns in some
form or another—still, he seems to have been bred in this country for the
purpose for which he is now used, and for that alone. In France,
America, Spain, and Portugal he is also used for sporting purposes.

He has always, as far as I can ascertain, been considered in England a
distinct breed of dog, cultivated for finding game by scent, and trained to
“ pointing” it when found—i.e.. to come to a standstill upon scenting it.
So innate is this propensity to point in a well bred puppy of this breed
that we frequently see him point the first time he is entered to game.
This is regarded by some sportsmen as evidence of an original disposition
to point peculiar to this breed, but all the information that I have
obtained on this matter goes to show that it was first only the result of
training, and now exists more as a communicated habit than anything
else. It is advanced in favour of the pre-disposition theory that the
setter has been bred, trained, and used for precisely the same purpose,
yet he does not exhibit this quality—spontaneous pointing—in anything
like the same degree. It is a fact that the pointer does, as a rule, take
to pointing much earlier in his training, but the cause of this I must
leave for others to decide.

The pointer, however different in form to what he now is, and in Bpite
of the many crosses to which he has been subjected, seems to have
experienced very little change in his leading characteristics. The
crossing him with other dogs, which at various times has been tried, has
not eradicated the “ stamp ” peculiar to his breed; neither is it evident
that the object sought by infusing into his veins blood foreign to him
was bo much to change his character as to introduce qualities that it was
thought he might with advantage possess. By this I mean that it was
not so much to produce, by crossing with other breeds, a dog to do the
pointer’s work, as to render him more suitable to the work which he was,
through change of circumstances, required to perform. In most cases, I
believe, first crosses have proved failures, whether with foxhound or
other dog. The foreign blood thus imported had to be diluted (if I may
use the expression) by oroBsing back again with the pointer, before even
so good a dog as the pure pointer was produced. “ Droppers ”—for such
is the name given to the produce of the first oross between pointer and
setter—are, in some few instances, fairly good ; but they are no improve-﻿The Pointer.

119

ment on the pointer or setter proper. The pointer of to-day is an animal
that has been produced by the most careful exercise of knowledge gained
by keen observation, assisted by extensive breeding and sporting expe-
rience. He is now a dog specially adapted to his work. He has been
rendered capable of doing it with the greatest amount of ease and effi-
ciency. By careful selection he has been divested of all the lumber that
was the cause of his distress in years gone by. His pace has been
improved by a due regard to the formation of his chest; it is now deeper
and narrower than formerly. He is, as a consequence, capable of hunting
a larger range of ground without becoming useless by excessive fatigue.
The ease with which the present shape of his shoulders and chest allows
him to sweep over his ground in graceful strides, and to preserve and
exercise with advantage his gift of scent, is a pleasure to witness.

There is no doubt that held trials and dog shows that have been held
for the past fifteen years have greatly contributed towards the attain-
ment of his present high state of excellence; but, much as I admire the
modern pointer, there is just one of his properties that I do not think
has been improved, at least, by no means so much as have others—I
mean his olfactory powers. He does not appear to possess any greater
or even so great a faculty of scenting game now as he did years ago.
But I am fully aware that the great speed at which most pointers hunt
the ground now, as compared with the old-fashioned dog of, say, twenty-
five years ago, ought to be taken into account in considering this matter.
It is more than probable that the slower a dog goes the greater are his
facilities for taking into his nostrils the atoms of scent. Assuming this
to be the case, the slow dog of the past had an advantage in “ winding ”
game over the flyers of to-day.

Be this as it may, the pointer now, to my thinking, does not “ spot” out
his game with the ease and certainty at the great distance he once did.
For let an old Blow dog trot round or across a field of ordinary size, and
if he did not point, you might depend on it there was no game in it. His
nose appeared to be good enough to allow him to go almost straight to
his game without the laborious quartering of the ground, which is now so
necessary, and without which much game would be left behind.

I may be permitted to remark that many of my sporting friends who
have used pointers all their lives are of my opinion upon the subjeot.
My father, too, has used pointers and Betters for nearly fifty years, and﻿120

British Dogs.

has, within the last few, trained some (and seen others at work) of my
pointers by champions Rap, Pax, Chang, Macgregor, and Bang; and
although he willingly admits their superior pace and style, yet he fails to
detect any increased range of nose over that he has been accustomed to
in good dogs he used very early in his sporting experience.

There is no doubt whatever that the modern pointer, owing to his
increased pace, and through being able to endure (by his better formation)
more hard work with less fatigue, is of more service to the sportsman ;
still there is room for improvement in him. What we want is to make
him as much superior in nose as he is beyond his ancestors in pace. This
as yet we have not accomplished. Of course increased pace allows of
more ground being hunted in the same time, and this of itself is a great
advantage; and it is this alone, in my opinion, that gives the modern
fast pointer the advantage over his slower rival. To illustrate what I
mean I may say that I have often put down my field trial winner Romp with
good-nosed slow dogs (local celebrities, too), and owing to her terrific
pace, she could always take and keep the outside beat; consequently
her chances of finding game were much increased, and she invariably beat
them “ hands down.” But it was only her pace, not her nose, that gave
her the advantage. The dogs she could easily beat were her equals in
nose. I have attended field trials for the last five years, and in no case
have I seen any pointer exhibiting an increased range of nose over that I
have seen in other good dogs.

A fear has often been expressed that, by breeding for pace, the staunch-
ness of the pointer would be detrimentally afEected. I am pleased to say
I do not find this to be the case. He is now, in this respect, all that a
sportsman can wish for.

As the pointer and setter are used for identically the same purpose, it
may be expected that I should say something as to their relative merit.
It is always an invidious task to draw comparisons, and in this case I
think it especially so; for each breed has a host of admirers, who are
ready to swear by their favourite’s superiority.

As we are all too apt to be influenced in our opinion by our surround-
ings, and by our likes and dislikes ; and, farther, to generalise from a few
instances that we may have had occasion to take knowledge of, I shall
content myself by pointing out that sportsmen of great experience, both
in the past and present, agree that the setter is the better adapted for﻿The Pointer.

I 21

hunting rough heather. Hia feet seemed to stand the work better. It
has also been said the setter can do more hard work ; but I think that,
the fact of the old-faBhioned pointer being so heavy in frame and build
that he conld not bear the strain of continued hunting, has produced an
unmerited prejudice as to the powers of endurance of the breed.

I possess pointers (and I do not for one moment suppose I am
an exception) equal to any amount of work. The subject of the
illustration, Special, I have hunted daily week after week, and never
Baw him either footsore or come to a trot. And the pointer, I am fully
persuaded, is more readily trained to his duties than the setter. He
seems to take more kindly to his work, and is generally kept up to his
training with less trouble. I have seen pointers that have not been
turned into a field for a year or two go and do their work in rare form, as
if they had been in full training. I do not think the pointer is such a
oompanionable dog as the setter. He is “ all there ” when at work, but
afterwards the kennel seems his proper place. He does not acquire so
muoh affectionate amiability of character from his association with man-
kind as does the setter and other sporting dogs. Of course there are
exceptions to every rule, and I know some few pointers that are remark-
able for their attachment and sagacity.

By old sportsmen, and in books, too, we have had some truly
astonishing accounts given of intelligence displayed by them when at
their legitimate work, and 1 feel bound to say that, after what I have
seen, I am inclined to believe quite possible much that I thought wholly
inoredible. Had it not been for the high authority who stated the faot
that a dog, when used by him with a puppy, would worry the puppy
beoause he flushed game, I could not have credited it for one moment;
but, since this has appeared in print, a similar fact has been demonstrated
before my eyes ; and more, the dog that would do this would also, when
told, run after and bite the puppy that persisted in chasing game.
I have also seen a pointer leave his “ point ” and go round the birds that
were running from him, apparently to prevent them getting up “ out of
shot,” and this without the least instruction.

These facts serve to Bhow what a high degree of sagacity it is possible
to obtain in the pointer. 1 feel sure that it will be Baid by many of my
readers, “ No matter what you say in favour of the pointer, he is of less
service to the sportsman than he has ever been. ’ ’ As far as partridge﻿122

British Dogs.

shooting is concerned, I am compelled to admit that he is the victim of
circumstances. The change made in the system of cultivation in Eng-
land has been such that, from lack of cover to hide his game (which
enabled him to get up to it), and not from degeneracy in himself, he has
become of less service now than he was in the days of small enclosures
and reaped stubbles.

The stubbles, once the chief cover, are now cut by the machine so close
that it is next to impossible for game to lie to a dog on them. This,
with other changes in agriculture, militates strongly against the dog.
He has now to work against very great difficulties, and difficulties whioh
are not, I am sorry to say, likely to disappear. In spite of these disadvan-
tages, I still maintain that a good pointer can be used during the first
month of the season with pleasure and advantage. I have always used
my dogs this season, whether I have been shooting alone or in company,
and during the first three weeks, in a very rough country, over 100 braoe
were killed to them, and they did excellent service in finding wounded
game.

A friend to whom I lent my bitch Stella killed over her 100 brace
to his own gun, and in the latter part of September he WTote me,
‘ ‘ I find I can still have good sport with your dog. Stella is all that
I can wish for as a pointer, and I never lose any wounded game with
her ; she has rendered me excellent services. She does in her work all
but talk to me.”

Now, even in Scotland, “setting” dogs are, after the first three
weeks, of little service ; so that for partridge shooting (where it is not
conducted in gangs) I consider that the pointer has still, through his
usefulness, a heavy claim on our regard.

Before I proceed to define the points considered necessary to make up
a first-class prize winning pointer, I may just say that there can be no
doubt whatever that the standard of points used to decide as to which
is the best looking pointer is in some measure a fancy and an arbitrary
one. It makes some points essentially necessary that are of no real
practical value, because they have no direct or indirect bearing on the
dog’s utility. The possession of them does not render him any the more
fitted to assist the sportsmen with the gun.

I do not demur to the points now adopted as tests of beauty, simply
because we all have our ideas of what is beautiful, and the standard﻿The Pointer.

123

may represent the framer’s views of it, but I only wish to point out
that in matter of mimitice the standard of points used to decide which
is the best looking pointer need not be applied to dogs bred for sporting
purposes alone, for whether they possess these trifling points or not
does not in any way affect their usefulness; such, for instance, as that
a pointer must have a deep stop between the eyes, and a well pro-
nounced drop from skull to nose; no loose skin on his throat, called
“ throatings ” ; ears set on low, and lying flat to cheeks ; a nicely tapered
stern, &o. That these are not absolutely necessary to render a pointer
good at his work will be clearly understood by every sportsman, and in
Bupport of this statement I may add that many dogs remarkable for
their excellence in the field do not possess them. That celebrated field
trial winner Drake (sold at seven years old for 150 guineas to Mr.
Price, of Bala), a marvel in his day, although possessing in a very
marked degree the points of endurance, wear and tear qualities, cannot
raise any claim to be considered good looking in a show-bench point
of view. In general outline he is just the build that is looked for in a
dog of whom a lot of hard work is required; but on critical examina-
tion—that is, taking into consideration all the little etceteras which go
to make up a show-bench winner, he is found very deficient. Only
oompare him with his kennel companion, the celebrated show-bench
winner Wagg, and then the points which make Wagg so successful
will be seen to be entirely absent in him. These are the points which I
would be understood to call “ fancy points.”

I know well that many good-looking dogs have won at field trials, but
the fact that many more that are not good-looking have taken the most
prominent position as field trial runners remains. Dogs that have,
by their excellent qualities in the field, quite charmed me, have been
most unlike what is considered a good-looking show-bred bench
pointer.

I know the object of the standard of points was to combine the useful
and the beautiful, and that these have not been more successfully
united in the pointer of to-day is no reflection on breeders. Pointers are
now, there can be no question, far better looking than in former years,
but that the best for field purposes are not always the best looking is
a well-established faot. In the productions of nature, and of animal
nature especially, great beauty and great usefulness are very rarely com-﻿124

British Dogs.

bined, and that pointers possessing both are the exception, not the rule,
is quite certain.

Our leading prize winners, under different, and even the same judges,
so very frequently change places in the prize list, that it is almost
impossible to select a dog aB “the model” of what a pointer should be.
In the midst of this strange conflict of opinion as to which is and which
is not the ideal pointer, and in spite of the fickleness of individual judges,
it must be admitted that many of the principal prize takers of to-day
are dogs of striking symmetry, and such as possess all the essential
qualities to make excellent sporting dogs, although their beauty may be
of very different types.

As far as can be gathered from decisions given, it now appears that—

The head should be long, and that from the corner of eye to end of
nose should be as long as possible. There should be a well pronounced
stop between the eyes, and. a good drop from the skull to nose. The
space under the eye, between the eye and nose, should be cleanly cut.
This seems to give character to the face; when this part is filled up it
makes the head look what is called “ gummy.” The skull should not be
too wide between the ears, nor too prominent from corner of set of ear
to the eye. Dogs with wide skulls and full temples are very frequently
extremely headstrong, and far too independent of their master’s instruc-
tions when at work. They do not acquire in intelligence by this increased
size of skull so much as a selfish liking to do as they please when beyond
immediate control—a very troublesome fault. The lips should not hang
down like the bloodhound’s, nor yet taper up to nostrils so much as the
foxhound’s.

The eyes should not be sunken like the hound’s, nor yet “ goggle-eyed,”
but should be full of animation and intelligence. A sullen, hard-looking
eye is to be avoided; it is frequently the indication of a headstrong,
ungovernable animal, almost worthless in the field.

The ears should be thin and silky, and of such a length as to reach just
below the throat, that is, when hanging in the usual position. They
should be set in below the square of the skull, and hang flat to the
cheeks.

The neck should be long and muscular, springing out cleanly from
the shoulders, and pinned to the skull in the same way. It should be
slightly arched.﻿The Pointer.

125

The forelegs should be straight and strong, the arms muscular, the
elbowB well let down, and coming down well under the body, not out at
elbow or pigeon-toed. The pastern, should be short and well developed.

The feet should be of proportionate size to the dog, and either round
or cat-shaped, or pointed like that of the hare. I have seen dogs with
both kinds stand any amount of work without going lame, therefore for
nse I think there is no difference ; but for show purposes the round foot,
with well arched toes, looks the smartest.

The shoulders should be long, thin, and sloping backwards ; great
attention should be given to them, as a dog with a thick loaded, straight
shoulder, will have a cramped, stilty, laboured gallop.

The chest should be deep, and not wide, the ribs well sprung from
baokbone, and not shovelling at the brisket.

The body should be long and powerful ; a weak, tucked up body is a
great defeot, indicating lack of constitution, and a dog without a good
constitution is not capable of enduring consecutive hard work. The
back ribs should be deep, and the last rib as near the hip bone as
possible to get it. Much length from last rib to hip gives an appearance
of a slack weak loin.

The loin should be slightly arched, very wide, strong, and muscular.

It is upon the hind legs and thighs that a dog chiefly depends for his
propelling leverage. If they are weak and ill formed the dog is a poor
“ stayer.” The thighs should be very long and muscular, well developed,
with a prominent seoond thigh. The stifle fairly bent, and slightly in-
clined outwards. The hocks large and strong, and coming straight with
thigh, not in, or cow-hocked. The hip wide apart and well up, at least
as high as the line of back, even when the dog is in good condition. The
dogs with wide, ragged hip bones are generally dogs with speed and
endurance.

The tail should be short, but not shortened, fine at tip and strong at
root. It should be set on just below the line of back, and not too low
down to make the dog look ” goose-rumped.” It must not be curled
over back like the hound’s, nor yet drooping like the Clumber’s. It
Bhould be oarried in a lively manner just above the level of the back.

Symmetry is, as far as I can define it, a perfect unity of proportion of
all the points before enumerated, bo sb to present the beautiful outline
that is so pleasing to the eye. A perfeot adaptability of each part of the﻿126

British Dogs.

dog to the exercise of all his powers to the greatest advantage. For
instance, some dogs possess several points in a very marked degree of
excellence, and still, because other parts are deficient, their symmetry will
be said to be at fault. Unless all parts are considered collectively, no
estimate can be formed of symmetry; and then it is very difficult to
estimate correctly.

Colour I do not consider should have any weight in a decision at all.
A predominance of white has been thought to be best, because it assists
the sportsman in detecting the whereabouts of his dogs in high covert;
but as to the colour of the markings on this white ground, why I attach
no importance to it whatever, and in support of this opinion I may say
we frequently see equally good pointers of different colours. A few
years ago the lemon and white were the most fashionable, but for the
past year or two the liver and white have been the most successful prize
winners. For smartness of appearance in the show ring I consider liver
or lemon and white the best colours.

There is much that is quite essential in making up a first-class pointer
that show-bench beauty—however much it may be admired and valued—
does not vouch for the possession of; consequently, a great deal besides the
points of merit as given in my standard, whereby to judge of appearance,
has to enter into the calculations of a successful breeder. For instance,
a dog may comply with all the conditions there laid down to make him
a successful show dog, and yet be a worthless brute for the purposes
for which the pointer is bred ; and as these qualities, so necessary to
make the dog useful, are transmitted from parents to offspring, it is
only reasonable in breeding to exercise the same care to produce what is
needed in the dog to make him suited for his work as is employed to
obtain the beauty that now graces the pointer classes at our large
shows.

As much difference exists between pointers in their working capacities
aB in their appearances, and sportsmen know well enough how to appre-
ciate the qualities that make a dog a good performer in the field. Dogs
that can successfully run through a big stake at field trials are con-
sidered more valuable than those that are able to win many a champion
cup on the show bench. And, having knowledge of this fact, I think it
becomes me, in writing on this subject, to define that which is of suoh
primary importance to those interested in the breed.﻿The Pointer.

127

First, it is of great importance that pointers should have a good nose to
enable them to scent game at a distance, the further off the better,
provided they have sufficient discrimination in using it to prevent them
false-pointing. The necessity for this quality is so evident that I will not
dilate further upon it, simply adding that this subject, nose versus brains,
in setting dogs, is full of interest, and one that I should like to discuss
with other breeders.

Next to this is a natural love of hunting, without which no dog ever
attains to any great perfection, and with it many dogs, weak in other
points, become, by practice, tolerably useful dogs. Those that frequently
require the words of encouragement, “ hold up,” are very troublesome to
break, and when broken often turn out lazy or display a lack of energy
that is painful to witness. From their nervousness and want of heart
they are unable to use to advantage the other good qualities they may
pOSBOSB.

It is a nice, lively, high-spirited, kindly-dispositioned dog that is so
much prized—those with plenty of pluck, and yet not headstrong or
reckless. Many dogs from their self-will, although possessing other
admirable qualities, become very difficult to manage, and nothing but
repeated and hard work will keep them under control. Such dogs are
never wholly reliable, and this is especially felt when using them in braces.
A good dog that is trying to do his best is tempted into doing wrong by
the provocation he receives from his reckless companion.

Many otherwise good dogs turn out useless because of their defective
temper, and, therefore, I think it is an all-important matter to get a good-
tempered dog, especially if he is to be trained for sporting purposes, for
in his work he haB so oontinually to hold in check his natural instincts
that, unless he has a good temper, he is oontinually forgetting his previous
training. Ab for myself, I have quite deoided never again to undertake to
train a dog that is thoroughly self-willed. It is, at best, a tiresome under-
taking, and, as yet, I have never found it worth the trouble it entails.
When a dog of this temperament gets beyond your immediate oontrol,
he iB often getting into trouble by doing something that is sufficient to
annoy you, or else the dose attention neoessary in working him destroys
half the pleasure the Bport should afford ; at least, such is my experience.

Dogs with a jealous disposition are, I consider, very defective. They
are difficult to deal with when using in braces, because they are not to be﻿128

British Dogs.

depended upon as “backers,” and, when opportunity serves them, they
will take away the other dog’s point—a most serious fault. This same
failing makes them reckless in their range, and they have the stupid
habit of follow the leader, instead of taking up an independent beat,
and, often from sheer jealousy, commit faults (amongst others, that of
“ flushing”), not from want of nose, but from giving too much attention
to what the other dog is doing, instead of minding their own work.
What is most needed in a pointer to make him a good workman is a good
nose, plenty of pace, a level sweeping stride, that will enable him to hunt
a lot of ground without distressing himself, a natural love of hunting,
making him anxious to find game, with sufficient perseverance to make
him continue ranging, even where game is scarce ; a lively, kindly,
temperament, with plenty of courage without being headstrong, not
jealous of a companion, though ever ready to do his share of work,
standing correction for a fault without getting sulky or refusing to work,
neither sly, shy, nor wilful; carrying his head well up, never stooping to
ground scent ; having sufficient brains to make him clever at getting on
to “ point ” by making the best use of the wind in quartering the ground.
When a sportsman has succeeded in breeding or obtaining pointers
possessed of the qualities I have enumerated, as necessary for success on
the show-bench and in the field, if he takes my advice, he will be very
chary in parting with them.

The gentlemen that at present possess dogs nearest to my idea of the
model pointer are—Messrs. J. H.Whitehouse, Samuel Price, G. Pilkington,
E. Lloyd Price, G. Moore, T. Statter, C. H. Mason, Heywood-Lonsdale,
W. Arkwright, Barclay-Field, E. P. Leeche, Yiscount Downe, and Lord
Sefton.

The brace illustrated, Special and Stella, combine in a marked degree
those qualities I have attempted to describe, and which I consider are sine
qud non in a first-class pointer. Stella has been decided by competent
judges to be one of the best large pointer bitches in England,
as evidenced by the fact that some five years ago she won the
cup at the Crystal Palace, and then, after a rest of four years,
was again shown and won first Palace, first Birmingham, and then
took champion cup at Birmingham in 1878, which proves that for
the last few years nothing haB been produced that can relegate
her to a “back seat.” She is one of the very few Sancho bitches﻿TCH “STELLA.﻿﻿The Pointer.

129

still living, and it is to this blood much of the excellence of the
pointers of 1879 is due. I may just mention the fact that very
prominent—indeed, the most prominent—prize winners for years past
have been direct descendants of Sancho, viz., champions Wagg, Don II.,
Pearl, Blanche, Macgregor, Cedric, Luna, Stella, &c., &c. What other
dog can show such an illustrious family ? And it must be remembered
that this dog died very young. His litter brother, Chang, too, was a
champion in his day. Now, leaving the past, we then find that so strong
is his blood that his daughter, Mr. Leeche’s Belle, when put to Mr.
Samuel Price’s Bang, has in two litters produced a whole string of
winners, sufficient to sweeb the board for some time to come. One of
the first litter, Bow Bells,1 has scarcely suffered a defeat. She has in
three years taken the first prizes and champion at the leading Kennel
Club shows. ,£200 has been offered for her. Her sister, Zeal, has also
been successful here, and more so in America. If only shown in good
condition she is almost beyond beating in any company. Again we find,
in a strong class at the late Alexandra Palace Show, five bitches out of a
later litter, sisters to Bow Bells and Zeal, are those left in for all the
prizes given in this class, one of them afterwards taking the cup given
by The Country as the best sporting puppy bred in 1878. These contain
a large amount of Sancho blood, as their dam was by Sancho, and their
sire, Mr. S. Prioe’s Bang, was by Brockton’s Bounce, the sire of Sancho.
This is in-breeding, and probably accounts for the smallness of the
pointers produced by the Belle and Bang cross. However, this is suffi-
cient to establish beyond doubt the Sancho blood as of the very best.
Besides these being good show-bench dogs, they are equally good in
the field; indeed, Bapid, Bomp, Macgregor, Bow Bells, Zeal, and Wagg
have all figured in field trial prize lists, so their achievements must be
added to the successes of the Bame blood. It is a rare thing to find
pointers of this strain that are not good at work, providing, of course,
they have been properly handled. They are rather exoitable, but when
settled down to their work they are very reliable, and no day is too
long and no work too hard for them.

Speoial is a dog of great muscular development. He has only been
exhibited seventeen times, and has won sixteen prizeB. His pedigree is
of the best, combining ub it does the blood of the most noted field trial
and show-bench winning strains existing in England at the present day.﻿130

British Dogs.

I have owned and worked many pointers, but none better than Romp,
Special, and Stella, above referred to.

The engravings given are from sketches taken by that successful
artist, Mr. Arthur Baker, and I am pleased to vouch for the faithfulness
of the likenesses he has produced.

The following measurements, very carefully taken, are of two cele-
brated prize winners. It will be seen that there is very little difference
between the two dogs. They are both magnificent animals. Wagg took
the cup as best pointer in the show at Birmingham, and Don has onoe
beaten Wagg under the same judge.

MEASUREMENTS OF MR. FLETCHER’S DON AND MR. LLOYD PRICE'S

WAGG.'

Height at shoulder 			Don.  in.  	 24* 		Wags.  in.  ... 24
Length of body					 31			... 31
Length of head 					 94 		...	94
Round skull					 184 		... 184
Round loin 					 23			... 25
Round thigh					 16 		... 16
Round second thigh					 94 		...	94
Round chest					 294 		... 30
Round forearm 					 8 		... 7f
From comer of eye to end of nose			 3| 		...	4
Length of ears 					 6 		... 6
Distance between ears ...					 6 		...	64
Top of shoulder to elbow				 114 		... lli

PEDIGREE OF SPECIAL.

	Romp (owner)	Romp (Brackenbury’s)	
►a		Champion Chang	Champion Bell Bounce (Brockton's)
§  P*  CO	Champion Pax	Nina	Hamlet Sal Romp (Powis’s)
		Priam	Bob (Price’s)  Mona (Whitehonse’s)

Measurements of some celebrated pointers :

Mr. J. H. Salter’s Chomg II.: Age, about 5 years ; weight, 651b. ;
height at shoulder, 24in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 36in.; length
of tail, 1in.; girth of chest, 30in. ; girth of loin, 24in.; girth of head,﻿a﻿﻿The Pointer.

131

17in. ; girth of forearm, 7fin. ; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 9£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, llin.

Mr. Geo. Pilkington’s Fancy : Age, 4 years; weight, 481b.; height
at shoulder, 22Jin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 37in.; length
of tail, 12in.; girth of chest, 26£in.; girth of loin, 20in.; girth of
head, 14in.; girth of forearm, 6fcin.; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, 9in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
9in.

Mr. Geo. Pilkington’s Faust: Age, 4 years ; weight, 701b.; height at
shoulder, 25in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 39in.; length of tail,
14|in. ; girth of chest, 30£in. ; girth of loin, 22£in.; girth of head,
17|in.; girth of forearm, 7fin.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 9£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 10£in.

Mr. Geo. Pilkington’s Tory. Age, 5 years ; weight, 621b. ; height at
shoulder, 25£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 39in.; length of
tail, 14in. ; girth of chest, 30£in.; girth of loin, 21in. ; girth of head,
16£in. ; girth of forearm, 7in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 9£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 10£in.

Mr. Geo. Pilkington’s Qa/met: Age, 3 years ; weight, 581b.; height at
shoulder, 25fin. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 39in.; length of tail,
14in.; girth of chest, 29in. ; girth of loin, 21in. ; girth of head, 16in. ;
girth of forearm, 7in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9£in. ;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 10in.

Mr. G. Thorpe-Bartram’s Stella: Age, 6£ years; weight, 581b.;
height at shoulder, 22£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 36in. ;
length of tail, 15in. ; girth of ohest, 30in. ; girth of loin, 22in.; girth
of head, 16£in.; girth of forearm, 7fin.; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, 9|in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
9in.; girth of neck midway between head and shoulders, 15fin.; length
from oomer of eye to end of nose, 4in.; length from elbow to top of
shoulders, ll£in.; length of ear from top to set on at skull, 6£in.

The following are the property of Mr. B>. J. LI. Price :

Wagg : Age, 8 years ; weight, 701b.; height at shoulder, 24in.; length
from nose to set on of tail, 44in.; length of tail, 13in. ; girth of ohest,
30in. ; girth of loin, 23in. ; girth of head 17&in.; girth of forearm, 8in.;
length of head from oociput to tip of nose, lOin.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes, and tip of nose, 10in.

k 2﻿I32

British Dogs.

Grog : Age, 3 years ; weight, 601b.; height at shoulder, 25in.; length
from nose to set on of tail, 38in.; length of tail, 14in.; girth of chest,
28in.; girth of loin, 22in.; girth of head, 16£in.; girth of forearm, 8in.;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9fin.; girth of muzzle
midway between eyes and tip of nose, 9£in.

Eos Cymru : Age, 4£ years ; weight, 651b.; height at shoulder, 25in.;
length from nose to set on of tail, 37in. ; length of tail, 14£in.; girth of
chest, 29in.; girth of loin, 23in. ; girth of head, 17£in.; girth of fore-
arm, lOin.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, lOin. ; girth of
muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 9in.

Dandy Drake : Age, 2 years; weight, 461b. ; height at shoulder,
23in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 39in. ; length of tail, 12in.;
girth of chest, 27in.; girth of loin, 17in. ; girth of head, 13in. ; girth
of forearm, 9in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9in. ;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 9in.

Irrepressible : Age, 2 years ; weight, 581b.; height at shoulder, 25in. ;
length from nose to set on of tail, 36iin.; length of tail, 13in.; girth
of chest, 29in.; girth of loin, 21£in. ; girth of head, 17in. ; girth of
forearm, 9in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9^in.; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, lOin.

Belle : Age, 9 years ; weight, 561b. ; height at shoulder, 24in. ; length
from nose to set on of tail, 38£in.; length of tail, 14in. ; girth of chest,
29in.; girth of loin, 21in.; girth of head, 13in.; girth of forearm, 8in. ;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9in.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 8£in.

Bow Bells: Age, 3 years ; weight, 521b.; height at shoulder, 24£in.;
length from nose to set on of tail, 36in.; length of tail, 13in.; girth of
chest, 27£in.; girth of loin, 21in.; girth of head, 18in.; girth of forearm,
9in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, lOin.; girth of muzzle
midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8£in.

Sixpence: Age, 4 years ; weight, 521b.; height at shoulder, 22in. ;
length from nose to set on of tail, 37in. ; length of tail, 12£in. ; girth of
cheBt, 27in.; girth of loin, 23£in. ; girth of head, 15in. ; girth of fore-
arm, 8in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9in. ; girth of
muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8in.

Ben : Age, 3 years ; weight, 421b. ; height at shoulder, 20£in. ; length
from nose to set on of tail, 33in. ; length of tail, 13in.; girth of chest,﻿The Dropper.

*33

26in.; girth of loin, 20in. j girth of head, 15in. ; girth of forearm, 8in. ;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9in.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 8£in.

Jwno : Age, 2 years ; weight, 481b. ; height at shoulder, 23in.; length
from nose to set on of tail, 37in.; length of tail, 13in.; girth of chest,
26in. ; girth of loin, 20in.; girth of head, 13in.; girth of forearm, 8in. ;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9in.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 8in.

Nimble Ninepence : Age, 6 years; weight, 481b.; height at shoulder,
22£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 35in.; length of tail, 13Jin.;
girth of chest, 25in.; girth of loin, 21£in. ; girth of head, 13in.; girth
of forearm, 8in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9in.; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 9in.

Beau : Age, 6 years ; weight, 511b.; height at shoulder, 23in. ; length
from nose to set on of tail, 34in.; length of tail, 13£in.; girth of chest,
27in.; girth of loin, 20in. ; girth of head, 16in. ; girth of forearm, 8in. ;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, lOin.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 9in.

Chapter XXII.—THE DROPPER.

By Corsincon.

The cross between the setter and the pointer is so called, and often
proves to be a hardy, useful dog, displaying the excellencies of both
parents; but, although individual specimens turn out all that their
owners wish, the oross is not a desirable one, resulting in the first
generation in produce of the most varied types, nor oan it be continued
with advantages or any certainty.

It has therefore followed that these are but seldom bred now, and they
never find a place at any of our shows.

﻿GROUP IV.

Bogs used with the Gun in questing and retrieving

Game.

Including:

1.	The Black Spaniel.

2.	The Cocker.

j. The Clumber Spaniel.

4.	The Sussex Spaniel.

5.	The Norfolk Spaniel.

6.	The I rishWater Spaniel.
J. English Water Spaniel.

8.	The Flat or Wavy-

coated Retriever.

9.	The Curly-coated Re-

triever.

10.	The Norfolk Retriever.

11.	The Russian Retriever.

In conformation of head this group agrees closely
with the preceding one. The spaniels and retrievers,
although not so closely allied as the setters and spaniels,
are grouped together on the plan already explained.
Youatt thus describes the head characteristics of the
spaniel family: “The head moderately elongated, the
parietals not approaching from their insertion, but
rather diverging, so as to enlarge the cerebral cavities
and the frontal sinuses, consequently giving to these
dogs greater power of scent and intelligence.”

Chapter XXIII.—SPANIELS.

By Corsincon.

The spaniels, as we now understand the term, are a numerous family,
which has by modern breeding become split up into many divisions, most
of them pretty clearly defined, hut, in some instances, more by arbitrary﻿Spaniels.

135

eeleotion of the few for special honours from the great body of the family
on aooount of one special property than from general excellence, as, for
instance, the black held spaniels, for whom modern fashion reserves all
bench honours to the exclusion of parti-coloured dogs.

The wisdom of this I have always thought doubtful, and, indeed,
rather more than doubtful, and, in my opinion, our present classification
—the classification adopted at our shows—and the standard of excellence
required in dogs to win ignores the important, and, indeed, absolutely essen-
tial point of view to a sportsman, that of apparent working capacity. We
have allowed the arbitrary and ornamental points to supersede the useful,
and this is especially so in the rage for black spaniels to the exclusion of
others in the class now known as “ field spaniels.” Even the name is
not over-happily chosen; for in the wood, the oovert, the brake, or the
hedgerow the land spaniel, as he was originally called, is still more at
home than in the field, unless we use the term spaniel in the wider sense
adopted by our fathers as applied to the setter, and even the pointer,
which was frequently known as the smooth spaniel.

That oovert hunting has, however, for many generations, ever since
the introduction of fowling pieces, been the spaniel's great forte, there can
be no denying, useful as he often proves at different work. The poet
Somerville writes on this topic in terms as emphatio as they are stirring
to the soul of a sportsman :

But if the shady woods my oares employ
In quest of feathered game, my spaniels beat,
Puzzling the entangled copse; and from the brake
Push forth the whirring pheasant; high in air
He waves his varied plumes, stretching away
With hasty wing. Soon from th’ uplifted tube
The mimic thunder bursts, the leaden death
O’ertakes him; and with many a giddy whirl
To earth he falls, and at my feet expires.

With this in view we have to consider whether the modern spaniel, as
enoouraged by and bred for dog shows, is an improvement or otherwise, and
whether the plan followed by those who have the management of such
shows has not done a direct injury to the breeding of a very large, wide-
spread, and moBt useful class of dog, simply because they do not accord
with the distinctions of colour and other minor points arbitrarily set up.

First, let ns briefly glanoe at the history of the spaniel, or rather at a
few of the very meagre notices of him which we get at wide intervals. I﻿136

British Dogs.

believe the first notice of the spaniel by that name in English occurs in
“ The Maister of Game,” by Edmundde Langley. He says, “the houndes
for the hawke cometh out of Spayn,” and describes him as white and
tawny, with large head and body, not too rough in coat and with a
feathered tail; he further describes their general character and action,
and their use in the netting of partridge, &c., and also refers to their use
in the pursuit and capture of waterfowl.

The spaniel also occurs in the list of breeds of dogs given by the
Sopewell Prioress in the “ Book of St. Albin,” published 1486, but she
gives no description of it. A century later Dr. Johannes Cains, in his
book, “English Dogges,” says of spaniels, there are two sorts, one
“that findeth game on land,” and one “that findeth game on the
water,” and the same distinction is observed by all later writers up
to the present century.

Nicholas Cox, in “ The Gentleman’s Recreation,” published 1677,
copying Markham, I believe, describes the land spaniel as “of a good
and nimble size, rather small than gross, and of a courageous mettle ;
which, though you cannot discern being young, yet you may very well
know from a right breed which have been known to be strong, lusty,
and nimble rangers, of active feet, wanton tails, and busy nostrils, whose
tail was without weariness, their search without changeableness, and
whom no delight did transport beyond fear or obedience.”

Spaniels were in olden times also known by the name of the game
they were kept to, as “ a dog for the partridge,” “ a dog for the duck,”
“ a dog for the pheasant,” as in our own day we still have the cocker, or
dog for the woodcock; but at what date the term “springer” or
‘ ‘ springing spaniel ’ ’ was introduced I do not know, but presume it must
have been when the qualities of the setter or “ setting spaniel ” became
fully developed and permanently fixed by breeding setters from known
setting spaniels only, and keeping the breed of questing spaniels
distinct; the term springer was probably given to them on account of
their natural disposition to rush in and flush or spring their game.

In the “Sportsman’s Cabinet,” 1802-3, spaniels are treated by “A
Veteran Sportsman” under three divisions—the springing spaniel; the
cocker spaniel, in which latter class he includes the Duke of Marl-
borough’s Blenheims, now only recognised as toys ; and water spaniels.
The springers are described as differing but little from the setter of that﻿Spaniels.

I37

day, except in size, being about two-fifths less ; the engravings given in
illustration from drawings by Renaigle do not, however, bear this state-
ment out, the setter’s muzzle being truncated and the flews deep, as though
crossed with the Spanish pointer; while the springer, although shown
with open mouth, is evidently comparatively pointed in muzzle, and also
Bhorter in the back, and, indeed, very much more like the compara-
tively leggy but compact, active, merry-looking dogs still seen in numbers
throughout the country, and turning up in plenty at some West of Eng-
land shows, than the very long-backed and excessively long heads and
muzzles of the black field spaniel of the show-bench.

I do not wish to be understood as objecting to the black spaniel: his
beauty is undeniable, and the colour is no innovation, black having
always been recognised; and black and tan is also mentioned by old
writers, but I say that in length of body and stamp of head they are a
departure from the old type, and for working qualities a depar-
ture in a wrong direction. If we take our present illustration of Mr.
Holmes’ Flirt, it must be admitted she does not look like a dog suited
for a day’s hard work in a rough country, although she may do to potter
about the outside of a hedge, or put up a rabbit in turnips, and Flirt
is a good representative of the most fashionable and winning strain,
and shown with great truthfulness by Mr. Wood, the artist, in our
engraving.

What we want is a dog, more compact, with shorter and stronger
muscles coupling the back ribs and hind quarters ; and if the present
fashion is to be maintained—the prejudice in favour of black colour, long
backs, and setter-like heads—I plead for two classes at all shows, if their
purpose is to improve the various breeds of dogs for sporting purposes.
One olass for other than self-coloured dogs, representing the old springer
moBt generally diffused throughout the country, and weighing over, say,
251b., and a corresponding class for cookers weighing from 181b. to 251b.,
and I think it would not be difficult for sportsmen to agree as to a stan-
dard of points by which they Bhould be judged.

The Bpaniel is not only the oldest breed we have that has been kept to
the hunting of fur and feather, as a help to hawking, netting, and the
gun, but he is still the most generally useful of our game dogs, as he is
the most universal favourite ; in field or covert no dog works so close as
a well-bred and well-broken spaniel; neither fur nor feather can escape﻿138

British Dogs.

him; no hedgerow is too thick, no brake too dense for him to penetrate
and force out to view of the sportsman the reluctant game ; he is a most
active, ardent, and merry worker; his “wanton tail,” ever in motion
while he quests, increases in rapidity of action with that tremulous
whimper that tells so truly that he is near his game, and says to his
master, in tones that never deceive, “ Be ready; it is here.”

The spaniel is no less a favourite as a companion and house dog, for
which his watchfulness, sagacity, and fidelity, equally with his gentleness
of manners and handsome appearance, eminently fit him.

The present classification of spaniels, according to the Kennel Club
Stud Book, is, field spaniels—in which, as already observed, blacks almost
invariably usurp the whole of the prizes—Clumber spaniels, Sussex
spaniels, Irish water spaniels, and water spaniels other than Irish, and the
now purely toy varieties, Blenheim and King Charles spaniels. Having
referred to the older style of spaniel, the parti-coloured specimens of
which (and these are in a large majority of the whole) are practioally
excluded from bench-show honours, I shall proceed with a description of
the several varieties named, beginning with the modern favourite.

Chapter XXIV.—THE BLACK SPANIEL.

By Corsincon.

These dogs have achieved great prominence since the establishment
of dog shows, the principal breeders and exhibitors of them having been
the late Mr. Burdett, of Birmingham; the late Mr. Jones, of Oscott,
near Birmingham ; Mr. Phineas Bullock, of Bilston, Staffordshire ; and
Dr. Boulton, of Beverley, in Yorkshire; and the strains of these
several gentlemen’s kennels are now in the hands of a considerable
number of exhibitors and others throughout the country. The general
appearance is that of a long, low set dog, legginess being looked on
as a great fault; the general contour, enhanced by the bright glossy jet
black coat, is very pleasing. To take the points seriatim:﻿﻿HOLMES’S BLACK﻿The Black Spaniel.

139

The head is long, both in sknll and muzzle; the latter must not be
pointed, but rather deep than square, the skull standing up well above
the ears, the forehead fairly shown, and the occiput well developed.

The ears are set on low—as above inferred—lobe-shaped, long, and well
feathered, with straight and silky hair.

The eye is dark in colour, pretty full, but not prominent or watery, as
in the toy varieties.

The neok is long, pretty muscular when examined; covered thickly with
longish hair.

The whole barrel is rather long, with a tendency to too much space
between back ribs and hind quarters, which is a fault. The chest should
be deep, ribs moderately sprung, the back ones well let down, the back
well olothed with muscle.

The shoulders should be .moderately sloped and well clothed with
muscle ; fore legs straight, hind legs strong in stifle and moderately
bent; they must be strong of bone. The feet should be moderately
round, and the sole thick and hard; but the show specimens have so
much feathering that it gives them the appearance of having a long flat
foot. The knuckles are not muoh sprung, and the whole foot should be
a good size.

The tail, which is invariably docked, should be well feathered, and not
carried higher than on a level with the baok.

The coat should be a jet glossy black, free from rustiness and from
white, although a few white hairs on the chest are no detriment; in tex-
ture the coat is soft and silky, of good length, and free from curl,
longest on the breast, tail, ears, and legs, which are all well feathered.

The subject of our engraving is Flirt, the property of Mr. James
Holmes, of Wellington, Salop, and was bred by Mr. P. Bullock. Flirt is
a pure black, under 221b. weight, and a winner at the Crystal Palaoe,
Manchester, Hull, Nottingham, and many other shows. She is by the
Hon. W. Arbuthnott’s Nick (K.C.S.B., 2152) out of Chloe (K.C.S.B.,
2187); Nick was bred by Mr. Bullock, but no pedigree of him is given ;
Chloe was by Bob out of Nellie (these two being brother and sister), by
Young Bebb out of Flirt, by Jones’s Bob out of his Nellie, by his Bob
out of his Chloe ; Bob by Burdett’s Bob out of Jones’s Floe ; Bebb by
Old Bebb, from Lord Derby’s kennels, out of Nancy, by Lloyd’s Charley
out of Baggot’s Lady.﻿140

British Dogs.

The following measurements have been furnished by the respective
owners:

Mr. A. H. Easten’s black spaniel Brush : Age, 2f years ; weight, 401b.;
height at shoulder, 15in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 38in.;
length of tail, 5in. ; girth of chest, 26in. ; girth of loin, 24fin. ; girth of
head, 16in.; girth of forearm, 7in.; length of head from occiput to tip
of nose, 9fin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 9in.

Mr. A. H. Easten’s black spaniel Bona : Age, 2f years ; weight 321b.;
height at shoulder, 15in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 35in.; length
of tail, 4in.; girth of chest, 24fin. ; girth of loin, 22in.; girth of head,
14fin. ; girth of forearm, 6fin.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 8in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7£in.

Mr. J. W. Dennison’s black spaniel Beverlac : Age, 3f years; weight,
541b.; height at Bhoulder, 15fin. ; length from nose to set on of tail,
41in.; length of tail, 6in. ; girth of chest, 27in.; girth of loin, 25in. ;
girth of head, 18in.; girth of forearm, 8in.; length of head from occiput
to tip of nose, 9fin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 9fin.

Mr. William Avery’s field spaniel Black Douglas: Age, 17 months;
weight, 441b.; height at shoulder, 1ft. 3fin.; length from nose to set on
of tail, 3ft. 2in. ; length of tail, 5fin.; girth of chest, 2ft. lfin.; girth
of loin, 1ft. 9fin.; girth of head, 1ft. 5in.; girth of forearm, 6fin.;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, lOin. ; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 9 fin.

Chapter XXV.—THE COCKER SPANIEL.

By Corsincon.

Small sized spaniels, weighing from 201b. or even less to 241b., and of
all colours—liver, black, white with liver or blaok, and in these flecked
or mottled on face, legs, &c.—are still pretty numerous throughout the
country, and many of them are as good as they are handsome, but at dog﻿The Cocker Spaniel.

141

shows they are the exception, as they have been neglected for the larger
springers.

As one of the most beautiful, intelligent, and clever dogs, most useful
bustling, and merry in covert or hedgerow, they should receive more
encouragement—indeed, when we consider the wide field of usefulness
the spaniel fills, and the great number of very distinct varieties into
which the family is subdivided, it is not too much to ask for still more
classes for them at our shows.

I think we should have classes for liver-coloured cockers to include
the Welsh and Devon varieties, and also one for those of mixed colours,
the maximum weight for each class to be 241b., and I would take the
points of the black spaniel with the following difference.

The nose is not so square at the end, i.e., very slightly tapered. The
ears are smaller, lobe shaped, and well fringed. The length of back is
decidedly less in proportion to height at the shoulder than in the modern
field spaniel. The coat is soft, silky, abundant, not quite flat, but
showing a slight wavyness, not curly.

Weight, measurement, &c., of cocker spaniels :

Mr. John Kirby Pain’s Nell: Age, 2 years ; weight, 231b. ; height at
shoulder, 9in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 30in.; length of tail,
13in. ; girth of chest, 23in.; girth of loin, 18in.; girth of head, 14in.;
girth of forearm, 5in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 8 Jin.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 4in. bare ; colour,
liver mottled.

Mr. John Kirby Pain’s Flo : Age, 2 years ; weight, 231b. ; height at
shoulder, lOin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 29in ; length of tail,
13in.; girth of chest, 22in. ; girth of loin, 18in.; girth of head, 14Jin.;
girth of forearm, 5in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 8in. ;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 3in. full; colour,
liver mottled.﻿142

British Dogs.

Chapter XXVI.—THE CLUMBER SPANIEL.

By Corsincon.

The Clumber is unquestionably tbe aristocrat of the spaniel family, in
comparison to whom his modern black brother of the benches is a mere
parvenu, and the Irish water spaniel as an unkempt kerne to a
polished gentleman. The grave and somewhat weird Sussex cannot
oompare with him in dignity of demeanour, and the busy little cocker,
with his fussy usefulness, neat and taking though he be, is commonplace in
comparison with the Clumber, whose manners, solemn, slow, and almost
dull, are yet stamped with that repose which the least imaginative may
easily conceive rests on the proud consciousness of his long descent.

How the variety of spaniel under consideration came into being I have
failed to discover. That the present characteristics he presents have for
several generations of men been preserved by in-and-in breeding appears
pretty certain, and for long the breed was confined to the Newcastle
family, from one of whose seats they take their name.

But how a dog differing so considerably from other spaniels first
originated is a puzzle to me which I would like solved. His long barrel,
short legs, general heavy and inactive appearance, differ widely from the
sprightly cocker and ordinary springer; and then, again, his big heavy
head, large truncated muzzle, deep eyes, sometimes showing the haw,
suggest a cross with a short-legged hound, which the fact of his being
mute in questing seems to contradict. But, as I must have a theory of
his origin, I content myself with imagining that the introduction of
French bassets to the Clumber kennels may have produced the form and
stamped him with many of the peculiar features which distinguish him
from other breeds of spaniels.

The Clumber, if pure bred, invariably hunts mute; they have
excellent noses ; from their low build, great strength, thick flat coats,
and close lying ears they are extremely well fitted to force their way
through and under the thickest tangles of briar, whin, or bramble, but it
is not now in

Tbridding tbe sombre boskage of tbe wood﻿﻿r-i

5!

i-i ^

8

3

*8

I

$

3﻿The Clumber Spaniel.

143

that he is mostly used, but in the battue, where his silence, docility, and
excellent retrieving qualities make him valuable ; he is easily broken to
retrieve, qnd works steadily and with a plodding and untiring patience ;
many of them prove excellent water dogs, although that is not their
forte, and, well entered, they prove equally useful and steady on snipe,
pheasants, or rabbits ; in packs they work splendidly together, showing
less jealousy and disposition to copy than many breeds, and to the single-
dog sportsman the Clumber proves a useful, reliable, and, although a
rather Bedate one, an intelligent and pleasing companion.

This breed has been guarded with great jealousy by several of the
noble families in whose kennels it has long held a place ; of these, first
on the list are the Dukes of Newcastle, Norfolk, Portland, and Earl
Spencer.

Mr. Foljambe’s name is intimately associated with our best specimens.
Mr. R. S. Holford, in the earlier days of dog shows, exhibited some very
grand specimens ; and Mr. W. Arkwright, of Sutton Scarsdale, is an
enthusiastic admirer of the breed and a successful exhibitor and breeder ;
and among the more celebrated Clumbers exhibited of late years we
may inolude his Lapis (the subject of our engraving), Mr. Phineas
Bnllook’s celebrated Old Nabob, Mr. James Fletcher’s Beau, and Mr.
T. B. Bowers’ Belgrave.

A correspondent who has lately visited the Welbeck Kennels, celebrated
for their anoient and stainless pedigree, writes me he saw about a
score specimens, everyone fit to grace a show ring.

The general appearanoe of the Clumber is that of a long, low, heavy dog,
somewhat slow and dull-looking.

The head is large, long in skull, with the muzzle broad and cut off
square.

The eyes are large, often rather deeply set, with a quiet thoughtful
expression.

The nose is liver or flesh coloured.

The ears are large, lying close to the cheek, free from curl, but covered
with short dose hair, with rather longer hair at the edges.

The neok is long, thiok, and musoular.

The shoulders are very thiok through, and giving a heavy appearance.

The chest and body are deep and round, the ribs well sprung, wide
apart, and extending well back, the back ribs deep.﻿144

British Dogs.

The back is very long, straight, and both it and the loins are strong.

The hind-quarters are not much bent in stifle, the fore legs are straight
with immense bone, the fore arm very thick and strong, the feet large,
rather flat, and these and the legs are well feathered.

The tail is generally docked, but not very short, feathered, and with
a downward carriage.

The coat is thick, flat, and soft—a curly coat is objectionable; the
colour is white and lemon, which should be nicely distributed, the lemon
should come down the head to below the eyes, and be divided by a line or
narrow blaze of white up the forehead.

The subject of our engraving is Mr. W. Arkwright’s Lapis, winner at
the Crystal Palace Show, 1877 ; he is a three-year-old dog, by the Duke
of Portland’s Bob out of Mr. Arkwright’s Floss, by the celebrated Duke
out of Arkwright’s Bose.

The following shows the weight and measurements of Lapis and
other good specimens. Lapis is higher at the shoulder than many.

Mr. W. Arkwright’s Lapis: weight, 621b. ; height at shoulder, 18in. ;
length from tip of nose to set on of stern, 42£in. ; length from occiput to
between eyes, 6in. ; thence to tip of nose, 4Jin. ; length of tail, 6£in.;
girth behind shoulders, 29in.; girth of head, 18£in. ; girth of forearm,
8in.; girth of loin, 25in.

Mr. W. Arkwright’s Busy : Height at shoulder, 16in. ; length from
nose to set on of tail, 45in.; length of tail, 7in.; girth of chest, 26in. ;
girth of loin, 25in. ; girth of head, 17 Jin. ; girth of overarm, 7£in. ;
length of head from occiput to between eyes, 5Jin. ; length from eyes
to nose end, 3£in.

Mr. W. Arkwright’s Looby : Length from nose to set on of tail, 39in. ;
length of tail, 6in. ; girth of chest, 23Jin. ; girth of loin, 22in.; girth
of overarm, 7Jin.; length of head from occiput to between eyes, 6in.;
length from eyes to nose end, 4£in.﻿The Sussex Spaniel.

145

Chapter XXVII.—THE SUSSEX SPANIEL.

By Castra.

In introducing “ Castra ” to our readers it will be sufficient to say he
is a gentleman who has taken an enthusiastic interest in, and done much
to save the true Sussex spaniel from annihilation by absorption into more
modern strains. Not only has he been a successful breeder and exhibitor,
but nearly all the winning dogs of this strain at the present day are from
or bred direot from, his kennels.

“ Castra ” says :

“ This variety of spaniel is one of the oldest known breeds of English
sporting dogs, and is probably the one from which the setter has been
produced by the simple process of selection ; such appears to be the
opinion of ‘Idstone,’ and such was the opinion of the king of setter
breeders—I refer, of course, to the late Mr. Laverack—who went so far
as to admit that in breeding the animals for which he became so justly
famous, he always aimed at producing an enlarged spaniel; and main-
tained that the formation of a pure Sussex spaniel was perfection for the
purposes of endurance.

“ My theme has been so well and so exhaustively treated by modern
writers, and their writings are so fresh to my memory, that it will be
preferable, for my purpose to quote certain passages from Youatt,
* Stonehenge,’ and ‘ Idstone ’ verbatim, rather than permit their ideas
adopted by the writer to appear secondhand.

“ It is generally agreed that the spaniel is of Spanish origin, and thence
its name. Youatt declares * he is evidently the parent of the Newfound-
land dog and the setter; while the retriever, the poodle, the Bernardine,
the Esquimaux, the Siberian, and the Greenland dogs, the shepherd and
drover’s dog, and every variety distinguished for intelligence and
fidelity, have more or less of his blood in them.’

“ ‘ Stonehenge ’ says ‘ The Sussex is a distinot and a very old-
established breed. He divides the honours of old family with the
Clumber, and he always has been and always will be in demand; ’
whilst ‘ Idstone ’ writes in 1872 thus : ‘ The Sussex is nearly if not
quite extinot, and I have not seen a first-class one for some years.

L﻿146

British Dogs.

These dogs were as silent as Clumbers, but as a rule they would fling
their tongue under strong excitement, and especially on view, unless they
were broken to drop to game. Good spaniels may be obtained of any
colour, but the true Sussex is golden liver. The dog has never been
produced in great numbers, nor has he ever been common. He has been
in the hands of a few families, and the late Mr. Fuller, of Rosehill,
was celebrated as a breeder, and for the breaking and discipline of his
team.

“ ‘For the patient, genuine sportsman there is no better dog than the
short-legged, thick-set, long, and low spaniel, which ought to down
charge, to retrieve, and to swim well and cheerfully.

“ ‘ The Sussex possesses all these accomplishments, and is a capital
dog to go through thick covert or woodlands, being able, from his
formation, to burrow under gorse or tangle, and to rouse fur or feather
in situations inaccessible to his master.

“ ‘ For this purpose he should have a thick, straight, but not a
voluminous coat, such as shall protect but not impede him, and ears of
moderate size, or what a judge of exhibition spaniels would declare
small. A dog with heavily-coated ears, and with leather sufficient to
cover one-half of a football, may be ornamental to the benches of a dog
show, but he is useless as a sporting dog.’

<c From one cause and another Sussex spaniels had become well nigh
extinct about the year 1870, when a few gentlemen undertook the task
of resuscitation with this result, that the breed has now classes at all
our chief exhibitions, where there is generally to be seen a very fair
sprinkling of the old sort, although, I regret to say, that the spurious
article is still supplied in considerable numbers.

“ In general appearance the Sussex spaniel should be long and low, and
of a deep golden liver colour—not mealy nor yet puce—but the shades
of the liver in a strong light should appear golden.

“The head should resemble that of a good Clumber; it should not
appear long.

“ The ears should be lobe shaped, and thickly clothed with straight silky
hair ; and should spring in front from a point above the level of the eyes.

“The nostrils should be very large, and the lower jaw should recede
considerably; the flews should be so large as to be capable of being
drawn together underneath the extremity of the lower jaw.﻿The Sussex Spaniel.

147

“ The eyes should be of a dark hazel colour, and should be overhung by
the eyebrows. The expression should be extremely intelligent, and
entirely free from any indication of frivolity. Mr. William Lort says
that the true Sussex has a weird look, and that even when young it is a
steady, sober sort of dog.

‘ ‘ The neck must be thick, and not too long, with a slightly arched crest.

‘ ‘ The body must be long, deep, and very strong; the shoulders oblique,
and the loin just sufficiently arched to give an indication of power.

“The legs must exhibit immense bone; they should be short and
straight in front, whilst those behind should be very much bent at the
stifles and the hocks, in order to give the requisite propelling power to a
heavy, low dog.

“ The feet must be large, round in shape, and sufficiently furnished
between the toes with short, thick hair, which is necessary for the pro-
tection of the feet when at work.

“ The tail—whioh indicates the purity of a spaniel sooner than anything
—should be docked to a length of about 9in., and should be carried
below the level of the back, except under very strong excitement, such
as that caused by a quarrelsome dog.

“ The coat must be perfectly straight, of a hardish texture, and very
thick ; the feather must not be too abundant anywhere, nor must it
extend below the knees in front or the hooks behind.

“ The weight should be from 331b. to 401b.”

Measurements of some good Sussex spaniels :

Mr. George Parsons’s Mouse : Age, 3 years; weight, 26£lb. ; height
at Bhonlder, 12£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 33£in. ; length
of tail, 6in.; girth of chest, 23in.; girth of loin, 19£in. ; girth of head,
14in.; girth of forearm, 6iin.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
8fcin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8in.; from
elbow to toe nail, 7 Jin.; from elbow to ground when standing, 6in.; ears
tip to tip, 19in.; sex, bitch.

Mr. George Parsons’s Noble: Age, about 2J years; weight, 451b.; height
at shoulder, 16in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 40in.; length of
tail, 8in. ; girth of chest, 26in.; girth of loin, 19in. ; girth of head, 20in. ;
girth of forearm, 9in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, lOJin. ;
girth of muzzle midway between eyeB and tip of nose, 9in.; elbow to toe,
lOin.; elbow to ground, 9in. ; ears tip to tip, 23in.

L 2﻿148

British Dogs.

Mr. George Parson’s Puzzle: Age, 1 year; weight, 261b. ; height
at shoulder, 13in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 34in. ; length of
tail, 6in.; girth of chest, 22in.; girth of loin, 18in.; girth of head,
14£in. ; girth of forearm, 8in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 8£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8in.;
elbow to toe, 7fin.; elbow to ground, 6Jin.; ears tip to tip, 19in.

Mr. T. Jacobs’ champion Bachelor (K.C.S.B., 6287) : Age, 3£ years ;
weight, 461b.; height at shoulder, 15in. ; length from nose to set on of
tail, 32in. ; length of tail, 6in.; girth of chest, 25in. ; girth of loin, 23in.;
girth of head, 17in. ; girth of forearm, 7in.; length of head from occiput
to tip of nose, 9Jin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 9£in.; length of front leg from elbow to toe nail, 9in.; when standing,
from elbow to ground, 7fin.; length of ears from tip to tip, 22in.

Mr. F. C. Barton’s bitch Countess: Age, 10 months; weight, 401b.;
height at shoulder, 13in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 31in.; length
of tail, 5£in. ; girth of chest, 24in. ; girth of loin, 22£in.; girth of head,
15iin. ; girth of forearm, 8in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 8£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 9in.;
length of ears from tip to tip, 17in. ; golden liver colour.

Chapter XXVIII.—THE NORFOLK SPANIEL.

By Corsincon.

The Norfolk belongs to the springer branch of the family, and is rather
a leggy dog, of an average weight of about 401b., and generally liver and
white in colour.

This variety is stated to have been produced by a cross with a black
and tan terrier, and was often so marked, and was bred and kept by a
late Duke of Norfolk.

The specimens I have seen at Eastern Counties shows, and represented
to be pure Norfolk, were free from tan markings.

They are stated to be very staunch dogs, and, from their height and
strength, useful in high turnips and other cover, in beating which a
smaller and weaker dog would be lost sight of and soon tire.﻿﻿>r (K. C.S.B. 2062)—Dam Bridget (K.C.S.B. 201﻿The Irish Water Spaniel.

149

Except that they are considerably higher on the leg, the ears long and
lobnlar, deeply fringed with soft hair, the description of the modem
spaniel applies to them also.

Chapter XXIX.—THE IRISH WATER SPANIEL.

By J. S. Skidmore.

To a sportsman of limited means, or one who has not accommodation to keep
a team, the Irish water spaniel is the most useful dog he can have, inas-
much as he can be made to perform the duties of pointer, setter, retriever,
and spaniel; but, as his name implies, he is peculiarly fitted by tempera-
ment and by a water-resisting coat for the arduous duties required by a
sportsman whose proclivities lie in the direction of wild fowl Bhooting .
In this branch of sporting they have no equal, being able to stand any
amount of hardship ; this, combined with an indomitable spirit, leads
them into deeds of daring from which many dogs would shrink. Many
are the feats recorded of their pluck, sagacity, and intelligence. To a
well bred and trained specimen no sea is too rough, no pier too high, and
no water too cold—even if they have to break the ice at every step they
are not damped, and day after day they will follow it up, being of the
“ cut-and-oome-again ” sort. As a companion for a lady or gentleman
they have no equal, whilst a well behaved dog of the breed is worth a
whole mint of toys to the children, he allowing the little ones to pull him
about by the ears, to roll over and over with them, to fetch their balls
as often as thrown for him, and to act as their guard in times of
danger.

When I first commenced to keep Irish water spaniels, many years ago,
there were three strains, or rather varieties—one was known as the
Tweed Bpaniel, having its origin in the neighbourhood of the river of
that name. They were very light liver oolour, so close in curl as to give
me the idea that they had originally been a cross from a smooth-haired
dog ; they were long in tail, ears heavy in flesh and hard like a hound’s,
but only slightly feathered—fore legs feathered behind, hind legs smooth,
head oonical, lips more pendulous than M'Carthy’s strain. The one I﻿British Dogs.

150

owned, which was considered to he one of the best of them, I bred from
twice, and in each litter several of the puppies were liver and tan, being
tanned from the knees downward and under the tail. I came to the
conclusion that she, at any rate, had been crossed with the bloodhound.
In Ireland, too, there exists two totally distinct varieties, whioh are
now known as the North and the McCarthy strains ; the former are in
appearance like a third-rate specimen of their southern relation, but are
generally much smaller, have less feathering on legs, ears, and head,
often a feathered tail, and oftener still are inclined to be crooked on their
fore legs. The M‘Carthy strain are a very much more aristocratic
looking animal than either of the afore-mentioned, and are
now found in greater perfection on this side the Channel than
on their native soil. Capt. E. Montresor, Rev. A. L. Willett,
Mr. Robson, and the writer are the oldest English breeders, and
in later years Mr. Lindoe and Rev. W. J. Mellor went into the
breed for a short time, and Mr. Engelbach and Lieut.-Col. Vemer
should also be classed amongst the older breeders. Both from Mr.
Engelbach and the late Sir Wm. Vemer I have derived benefit from
crossing with their strains, also from that of Mr. W. S. Tollemache’s, who
for a period of over thirty years kept the breed in its purity, and although
he never exhibited them he has owned some of the finest dogs of the breed
it has ever been my lot to look upon. Mr. Morton, of Ballymena,
Ireland, has for a long time been foremost in this breed in his own
country, and the moBt formidable opponent I have had to meet at our
shows. We have rung the changes repeatedly in crossing to our mutual
advantage.

It has been argued that the Irish water spaniel is too impetuous and
hard-mouthed to be worth much as a field dog. To this I must Bay that
the dogs which have caused this remark to be applied to the whole breed
have either been cross bred animals, or else have had a defective
education. With true bred dogs the reverse is the case, they being
tender-mouthed enough to please the most fastidious, and if they are
taken in hand young enough and trained properly, the libel will die
out. When Blarney (now Mr. P. J. D. Lindoe’s, if not dead) was a
puppy, I had her and her brother Fudge (who died of distemper), and I
trained them to retrieve by means of a tame pigeon, which from some
cause or other could only fly a short distance. I used to put it in my﻿The Irish Water Spaniel.

15*

pooket when I took the puppies out for a run, and for a period of at least
three months they each retrieved it some dozen times nearly every day,
without injuring the pigeon in tho least. I have seen one of them (the
dog I think) so afraid of harming it as to take hold of it by the wing and
fairly lead it to me. Can any other breed of retriever beat that for tender
mouths ? Their dam, Juno, was also as tender-mouthed, and as clever a
retriever as any sportsman could wish to be master of, but I will freely admit
that some of the breed have been made hard-mouthed, and so also have
hundreds of retrievers from the same cause. The Irish water spaniel, as
everyone knows who has owned one, is never satisfied unless he is doing
something to please his master; for this reason he is kept as a companion,
and taught to carry a stick, fetch Btones, balls, &c. This kind of
education it is which causes them to be hard-mouthed especially if this is
done before they have been taught to retrieve game. They are high-
oouraged like the Irish setter, and, like them also, when well broken,
cannot be beaten.

There is considerable diversity of opinion as to their points for
exhibition purposes, and since Mr. M'Carthy brought them to what he
oonsidered perfection, there has been a great confusion brought about by
judges (who have never been breeders) giving prizes to a class of dog
that was far from oorrect. For instance, Mr. M'Carthy, in his description
in the Field in 1859, says the head should be capacious, forehead pro-
minent, whilst his dogs, and the dogs of his day, were all square on
the muzzle. A dog with a head of this description would be ignored
nowadays, but I am by no means disposed to say that the snipe-nosed
ones, which certain of our judges go in for, are oorrect; it is the fashion
to call a weak bitoh-faoed dog “ full of quality.” This so-called quality in
the Irish water spaniel cannot be got without a corresponding loss of
bone and, in my opinion, constitution.

The head from the apex to the eye is large and oapacious, giving the
appearance of being Bhort, whioh is by no means the case, only appear-
ing so from its being so heavily furnished with topknot; the dog, which
looks long as a puppy, loses it as he gets older. The topknot is one of
the ohief characteristics of the breed, and it does not arrive at perfection
as a rule until the dog attains the age of about two and a half years ;
it should not grow straight across the faoe to between the eye like a wig,
but from the front edges of the ears should form two sides of a triangle,﻿152

British Dogs.

meeting in a point between the eyes ; the head should be well covered
with this topknot, the hair of which shoijld be in a dog in full coat 4in.
or more long, the forelocks hanging gracefully down the face, but I very
much admire the topknot when about half grown, and when standing
straight up all over the head in a most wild Irishman kind of manner.

The face is long, and is the most remarkable feature of the breed to my
mind, being in a good specimen quite smooth; the hair no longer than
that upon a smooth terrier—this short hair should extend to the cheeks.
I know of no other dog which carries the same quantity of hair on its
head, legs, ears, that has not also a rough face, and however remote may
be the cross of poodle or Russian retriever, it will show itself upon the
face and cheeks as moustachios and whiskers. This is a point which
judges should specially make a note of. I have named it to several, who
all have made light of it; not so, however, with Mr. M‘Carthy and other
breeders. The nose is large and with a slight squareness of muzzle.
The eyes, too, I have never seen taken into account by any judge, and
yet it is the eye that gives character to the face; this should be a deep
rich brown, which in the dark or shade is beautiful, not to be described,
but seen; a light yellow, or gooseberry eye, is my detestation, and is
always accompanied by a coat which before moulting time assumes a very
light sandy hue, whilst the dark-eyed ones are many shades darker at
the same period of coating.

The ears are about 18in. long in the flesh, lobe shaped, not pointed,
and when well furnished with hair should be from 26in. to 30in. from
tip to tip, when measured across the head. Old Doctor measured, when
he won the last time at the Crystal Palace, 31in.

The chest should be deep and the ribs well sprung, so that the body
appears round, rather than deep. The shoulders are inclined to be a bit
thick, as the dog all over should appear cobby.

The back and quarters are as strong as those of a waggon horse.

The legs should be straight, with good feet, well clothed with hair,
both over and between the toes ; the fore legs are heavily feathered at the
sides and behind, with a curled or rough appearance in front. The hind
legs are Bmooth in front, from the hocks downwards, whilst it is essential
that they should be feathered behind down to the foot. In crossing with
certain breeds, such as the retriever, this is one of the first points lost.

The tail is, like the face, a sure indication of the breeding ; and at the﻿The Irish Water Spaniel.

r53

risk of repeating myself, I assert that no other breed of dog exists with
a smooth tail which carries as much hair elsewhere as does the Irish
spaniel. These characteristics—viz., tail, face, and topknot—stamp
him, in my opinion, as the purest of pure bred dogs. The tail is
shorter than in most other dogs, thick at the root, and tapering to a
sting at the point. For about 3in. from the body it is covered with
small curls, the remaining portion being smooth.

The coat Bhould consist of innumerable hard short curls, free from
woolliness. These curls get felted, or daggled, before moulting time. A
woolly coat shows the poodle cross, which may also be detected in the
head. A silky coat, with an inclination to waviness instead of curl, indi-
cates a cross with land spaniel or setter; this cross also shows itself in
the quality of the leg-feather. The colour is that dark shade of liver
called puce, having a rich plum-coloured hue when seen in the sun. The
best coloured dog of the breed I ever saw was my old champion Duck
when she was in the prime of life. A patch or star of white is often seen
on the chest, and should not be regarded as fatal to a dog’s winning, as it
is met with in the best strains ; in fact, in a litter of puppies, if there is
one with more white on than the rest, it, as a rule, is the largest.
Whether white is a sign of strength or not I am not prepared to say.

In respeot to symmetry—by which I mean the general appearance of
the dog, his carriage, style, &c.—he should be judged as you would
judge a cob. Many of the dogs of the present day are too leggy. A
leggy Bpaniel of any breed I detest. The best dogs we have seen of late
years of this breed have been: Doctor and Eake, bred by Mr. Hobson,
Hull; Pilot and Sailor, breeder Eev. A. L. Willett; Blarneystone and
Chance, bred by Mr. Salisbury; Mr. P. J. D. Lindoe’s Blarney, Mr.
Engelbach’s Pat, Mr. Fletcher’s Young Doctor, Mr. Morton’s Paddy and
Shamrook, Mr. C. Pilgrim’s Barney, and Bridget and Patsey, all bred by
myself. The portrait represents Patsey, a son of Young Doctor and
Bridget, who possesses the characteristics of the breed in a remarkable
manner, especially when it is taken into aocount that he has been kept
ohained to a kennel all his life without any attention being paid to his
toilet.

Measurements of Irish spaniels :

Mr. H. E. C. Beaver’s Irish Spaniel Captain,-. Height at shoulder^
20Jin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 37£in.; length of tail, 13in. ;﻿i54

British Dogs.

girth of cheat, 27£in. ; girth of loin, 23in. ; girth of head, 17in. ; girth
of forearm, 7£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 8in. ;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8£in. This dog
has been twice round the world with hia master. Captain is a very good
specimen of the breed.

Mr. W. Beddome Bridgett’s Young Buck (K.C.S.B., 8337): Age, 5 years
3 months ; weight, unascertainable ; height at shoulder, 20in.; length
from nose to set on of tail, 38in.; length of tail, 14in. ; girth of chest,
25in.; girth of loin, 19in. ; girth of head, 15in.; girth of forearm, 6in. ;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9£in.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 8£in.; length of ear in leather, 18in.; length
of ear with feather, 25in.

Chapter	XXX.—THE ENGLISH WATER

SPANIEL.

By Corsincon.

In the Kennel Club Stud Book will be found a list of about two dozen
spaniels, classed as “Water Spaniels other than Irish.”

I have often pondered over this, wondering what it was meant to
include, and why the Irish water spaniel should be distinguished by a
class to itself, and the much older breed, the English water spaniel, be
ignored. I suppose it will not be denied that the English water spaniel
is at least historically older than the Irish. Every writer on dogs from
the fourteenth century to the present date has referred to them, and
more or less minutely described them.

Dr. Caius says of the water spaniel: “ It is that kind of dog whose
service is required in fowling upon the water, partly through a natural
towardness, and partly through a diligent teaching, is endued with that
property. This sort is somewhat big and of a measureable greatness,
having long, rough, and curled hair, not obtained by extraordinary trados,
but given by Nature’s appointment.”

In the “ Gentleman’s Recreation ” a very similar description occurs.﻿The English Water Spaniel.

:55

In the “Sportsman’s Cabinet” (1802), he is described as having “the
hair long and naturally curled, not loose and shaggy,” and the
engraving which accompanies the artiole—from a drawing by Renaigle,
engraved by Scott—represents a medium-sized liver and white curly-
coated spaniel, with the legs feathered but not curled. The woodcut in
Touatt’s book on the dog is very similar, and in his first work on the dog
“ Stonehenge ” copied this from Touatt’s book, and did not hesitate, in
addition, to give the points of the “ Old English Water Spaniel.” It is,
therefore, the more astonishing to find him saying in his most recent,
work, “ I do not pretend to be able to settle the points of the breed.”

The Kennel Club at their shows have, as has been already said, a
olass for “ Water spaniels other than Irish,” and the title of the class is
well deserved, for a more heterogeneous collection than generally com-
poses it could scarcely be found outside the Dogs’ Home, and in the
judging the description of the old English water spaniel as given by all
our writers on the subject is utterly ignored. Had the Kennel Club set
np a standard of their own, which sportsmen and exhibitors could read
and understand, there would be at least something tangible to deal with,
something to agree with or condemn ; but they ignore the only descrip-
tions we have of the breed, and give ns nothing but chaos instead, for
dogs have won in this olass of every variety of spaniel character, except
the right one.

It is true Touatt says, “ the water spaniel was originally from Spain,
but the pure breed has been lost, and the present dog is probably
descended from the large water dog and the English setterbut whilst
all seem to agree that our Bpaniels came originally from Spain, no one has
ever contended that they exist as imported without alteration by selec-
tion or oommixture with allied varieties ; and from all descriptions I
have met with the “ large water dog” referred to by Youatt was in great
part water spaniel, whilst our English setter it is very generally agreed
springs from the land spaniel.

As already said, from the earliest times we have the old English water
spaniel described as differing from the land spaniel. Edmond de Langley,
in “ The Maister of Game,” writes of the land spaniel, “ white and tawny
in oolonr and not rough ooated,” whereas the water spaniel is by every
writer described as rough and ourly coated, but not shaggy, and this very
deoided characteristic is ignored in the judging of water spaniels at our﻿156

British Dogs.

shows. Youatt says : “The hair long and closely curled.” “Stone-
henge,” in “The Dog in Health and Disease,” says “ head and tail
covered with thick curly hair,” and gives as an illustration of the
breed a woodcut of a dog with a distinctly curly coat.

I do not believe the breed is lost, but that scattered throughout the
country there are many specimens of the old English water spaniel, which
it only requires that amount of encouragement to breeding which it is in
the power of show committees to give to perpetuate the variety and improve
its form.

I have come across many specimens, and owned one many years ago,
which would fairly represent the breed as described and portrayed by our
older sporting writers.

The duties of a water spaniel require that he should be under the most
perfect command, obedient to a sign ; for silence in fresh water shooting
is absolutely necessary to success, waterfowl of all kinds being peculiarly
wary and timid. The dog should even be taught to slip into the water
noiselessly, and not with a rush and plunge, if the bag is to be well
filled; he must quest assiduously and in silence, keeping well within
range and working to signal; he must be a thorough retriever, as bold
and persevering as obedient, and, by early education, under the most
perfect command.

Two sizes are generally referred to, but, for the fresh water fowler, a
large dog is not required, and one 301b. to 401b. will work the sedges,
reeds, willows, &c., of river sides, pools, and locks, with greater advantage
than a big one.

The points of the English water spaniel I would describe as follows:

The general appearance, strong, compact, of medium size, leggy by com-
parison with the Clumber, Sussex, or black field spaniel, and showing
much greater activity.

The head, rather long, the brow apparent but not very great; jaws fairly
long, and slightly, but not too much, pointed, the whole face and skull
to the occiput covered with short smooth hair, and no forelock as in the
Irish water spaniel.

The eyes fairly full but not watery, clear, brown coloured, with intel-
ligent beseeching expression; the ears long, rather broad, soft, pendulous
and thickly covered with curly hair of greater length than on body.

The neck short, thick, and muscular.﻿Retrievers.

x57

The chest capacious, the barrel stout, and the shoulders wide and
strong.

The loins strong, the buttocks square, and the thighs muscular.

The legs rather long, straight, strong of bone, and well clothed with
musole, and the feet a good size, rather spreading, without being abso-
lutely splay footed.

The coat over the whole upper part of the body and sides thick and
closely curled, flatter on the belly and the front of the legs, which
should, however, be well dad at the back with feathery curls ; the pre-
vailing colour is liver and white, but whole liver, black and black and
white are also described by some writers.

The tail is usually docked, rather thick, and covered with curls.

Chapter XXXI.—RETRIEVERS.

By Corsincon.

There is, perhaps, no name that is applied to dogs of so many different
characters by the general public as Retriever, and if it can be correctly
used to describe the amazing varieties of mongrelism so designated,
it must indeed be a most elastic and accommodating term. In fact,
every big black or brown or black and white dog with a roughish
curly or a wavy coat, is dubbed a retriever. If we go to the Dogs’ Home,
where so many of the canine street sweepings are always waiting to be
claimed, we are sure to find twenty to thirty animals of most opposite
and incongruous types, all classed under the generic name of retriever.
Open a daily newspaper, and we are sure to find a greater or less number
of big black or brown dogs lost, described as retrievers, although
probably, not one of them bears more than a remote resemblance to the
retriever proper, as seen in suoh perfection at our dog shows and field
trials.

By a retriever is now understood a dog used with the gun, and whioh
recovers and brings in to the gun lost, wounded, or dead game, and in﻿158

British Dogs.

that sense it is not applicable to the deerhound, who, although he has
been termed a retriever, is only so to the extent of recovering and tracing
the lost trail of the wounded deer, but manifestly cannot retrieve it in
the sense that the retriever proper does smaller game.

If the definition of the retriever stopped there, there would be more
justification for the general loose application of the term than there is,
for it would be impossible to deny a dog’s right to the name until we
had proved his capacity for the work ; but it is one of the good things
which modern dog shows have done to define more or less clearly, not only
what the working capacities of a good retriever should be, but the external
appearance and all the points and physical attributes of the breed, so
that a retriever proper, whether good at his business or not, is, from his
tout ensemble, as easily recognised to be such as is either the pointer or
the setter to be what they are.

The retriever of the present day is quite of modern production, an
instance of intelligent selection and careful breeding up to a standard
which has been crowned with very marked success, and reflects the very
greatest credit on the skill and unwearying patience of those who have
worked at it, and now see their labours crowned with success. Those
who visiting a show admire the beautiful symmetry, fine intelligent
countenance, and jet black coats of the retrievers, whether wavy-coated
or curly-coated, and go away with the idea that the fine collection, every
one of which bears the unmistakeable family stamp, is a mere fortuitous
assemblage of dogs accidently alike, would be very far from the truth.
The idea of which these dogs are the embodiment was conceived in the
minds of certain sportsmen years ago, and has been slowly worked out,
every succeeding year seeing some fault bred out and desirable points
developed, till I am strongly of opinion that, if the breed has not reaohed
perfection, it is about as near it as human effort is likely to attain ;
yet it is not many years since a dog in white stockings won a
first prize at the Crystal Palace. In the early days of dog
shows, when it was more the custom to cry out that these insti-
tutions were ruining the various breeds than is the case now, there
was much discussion as to retrievers then in the course of manufacture
and it was clearly enough proved, if indeed it needed proof, that dogs to
do the work of retrievers, could be made by a combination of almost any
breed ; even a half bred bull dog has been known to do it. A cross with﻿The Black Wavy-Coated Retriever.

159

the foxhound was bound to give power of steady and persistent questing,
the bloodhound, the beagle, the terrier, and the colley were all suggested j
but with the advent and progress of shows came the desire, which has
continued to grow ever since, to combine in the same animal good looks
and good qualities, and in no breed has this been better attained than in
the retriever proper, as he is sometimes called, in distinction to the
retrieving spaniel, setter, or other distinct breed that may be used to
perform his special work.

Of modem retrievers there are four varieties, separated from each other
by distinctions in coat and colour. These are the flat or wavy-coated, and
the ourly-ooated, and these again are each divided into black and brown
or liver-ooloured.

At very few shows now is a class for liver-coloured dogs provided, the
black variety having so grown in public estimation as to have pushed
the liver almost out of sight; and this I, for one, regret, for there are
many very excellent specimens of the reds ; and I think it should be one
of the objects of dog show promoters to encourage, not discourage, the
production and propagation of varieties having distinot character, no
matter if for the time being they should be unpopular. “ Every dog has
his day,” says the proverb; and the time may yet come when brown
retrievers will be as fashionable as blaoks are now; and I think it is a
pity they should now be so entirely ignored.

In considering these four varieties, we will take first the one that I
think undoubtedly occupies the chief place,

		
Chapter XXXII.—THE BLACK WAVY-COATED
RETRIEVER.

By Corsincon.

When “Stonehenge” published his first edition of the “ Dogs of the
British Islands,” about ten years ago, he wrote anent retrievers that they
must be either “ black or black and tan, or black with tabby or brindled﻿i6o

British Dogs.

legs,” pointing out that the brindled legs were indicative of the Labrador,
to which breed we owe many of the beat qualities the wavy-coated
retriever possesses ; but in the present day a black and tan or a brindled-
legged dog would stand no chance in competition, however good, because
the self-coloured dogs have been brought to such perfection that they
would equal, if they did not excel, the marked one in all points, and
possess the desired jet black colour in addition, having thereby something
in hand to win with over their handicapped competitors. One of the best
working retrievers I ever saw in my life was a black and tan dog, the
property of Mr. Gavin Lindsay, The Holm, Sanquhar, and in point of
symmetry and good looks fit to compete with anything I ever saw ex-
hibited, but that his markings would throw him out. These tan mark-
ings are, no doubt, got from the Gordon setter, and are easily enough
bred out.

Perhaps the sires that have exercised most influence in stamping the
character of the present generation of retrievers under discussion are
the two Wyndhams, the one the property of that well known and successful
breeder, Mr. J. D. Gorse, the younger dog owned by Mr. T. Meyrick, M.P.,
the latter dog much used by that other most successful of retriever breeders,
the late John D. Hull; Paris, owned by Mr. S. E. Shirley, M.P., and bred
from imported Labrador parents; Major Allison’s Victor, and Mr.
Chattock’s Cato, both without known pedigree. Dr. Bond Moore paid
considerable attention to this breed some years ago, his kennels were
principally of Hull’s strain, and he had some remarkably fine specimens.
I remember seeing a litter of Midnight’s, if I mistake not, in Dr. Bond
Moore’s kennels, in which were two fine pups of a pale liver colour,
although both parents and grand parents were jet black.

The strains of the various breeders are now getting pretty well
commingled, and Mr. Shirley, who I consider is now the foremost of
retriever breeders, has in his the blood of nearly all the old notabilities
in conjunction with his own special Paris and Lady Evelyn strain.

The coat haB undergone very considerable modifications in this strain.
In old Wyndham (Meyrick’s), the wave became a ripple—almost a
surge—over the hips ; and a grandson of his that I now own, and who
greatly resembles Wyndham in other respects, has this peculiarity in a
very marked degree. Now, however, we have many with ooats as flat
almost as that of a smooth-coated dog, which I think an excess in the﻿I﻿﻿The Black Wavy-Coated Retriever.

161

opposite direction ; and personally I think, as a point of beauty, there is
nothing to compare with a nice and regular wavy coat.

In general appearance this dog in some degree resembles the New-
foundland, but is less in size, not so clumsily built, and altogether lighter
and more active looking ; and, not having so deep and shaggy a coat, he
shows himself built on finer lines.

The head is, for his size, large and long, with a good development of
brain before the ear—the muzzle is long and squarer than in the curly -
coated variety ; his capacious mouth should hold a set of large and white
teeth.

The ears should be small and lie close to the head, set on well back
and low, quite free from fringe, but covered with soft silky hair.

The eye large, dark in colour, mild in expression, and the haw never
exposed.

The neck, although muscular, is longer than in the Labrador, and has
that more supple appearance and freer action meant to be expressed by
the term “ airy.”

The shoulders Bhould slope well, and be well clothed with muscle like
the forelegs, which latter should be straight and of moderate length,
giving an average at shoulder of 23in. to 24in.

The ohest Bhould be broad, but not to the extent of pushing out the
elbowB from the straight line with the body, whioh would rob the dog of
his speed.

The back, loins, and hind quarters should all be strong, in keeping with
the fore quarters, without positive heaviness, so that the dog may with ease
carry a hare a distance over rough ground, stone dykes, or field gates.

The feet should be of moderate size, compact, and with good hard
soles, and the interstices between the toes protected with hair ; a splay
foot, with spreading toes, is very objeotionable.

The coat should be abundant and close, and long enough to fall in
gentle and regular waves, whioh is preferable to a perfectly flat coat. The
oolour should be a jet glossy black, and quite free from tan, brindled, or
white markings, but as I do not think there are many dogs whelped with-
out more or less white hairs on the chest, it is better, in my opinion, not
to allow a trifle of that kind to weigh for bo much as to offer an induce-
ment to plucking.

The stern should be strong and gaily carried, but not ourled over the

H﻿British Dogs.

162

back ; it should not be so strong or so bushy as that of the Newfound-
land, but plentifully furnished with feather.

The subject of our illustration is S. E. Shirley (M.P.), Esq.’s, Thom.

Mr. S. E. Shirley’s Thorn has not only proved successful in the show
ring, but is good in the field, and has proved eminently successful at
stud, his stock including Loyal, first at Birmingham and Alexandra
Palace; Wave, winner of first and also champion retriever prize at
Birmingham; Transit, first at Crystal Palace and Oxford; Trace, first
at Alexandra Palace ; Raven, first and cup at Warrington; and many
others. Mr. Shirley informs me, whilst Thom’s stock are, as a rule, good
workers, he has found the cross with the Paris blood and Thom better
for work than the Thom and Lady Evelyn blood.

The following particulars of weights and measurements of wavy-coated
retrievers have been furnished by the owners :

Mr. S. E. Shirley’s (M.P.) Thom : Age, 5 years ; height at shoulder,
22£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 37in.; length of tail, 15in. ;
girth of chest, 29£in.; girth of head, 16£in.; girth of forearm, 9in.;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 10|in.; girth of muzzle
midway between eyes and tip of nose, 10in.

Mr. G. Thorpe-Bartram’s Bonnie Lassie: Age, 3£ years; weight,
541b.; height at shoulder, 21in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 36in.;
length of tail, 13in. ; girth of chest, 28in.; girth of loin, 22in.; girth of
head, 17£in. ; girth of forearm, 7£in. ; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, 9jin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, lOin.; girth of neck midway between head and shoulders, 16iin.;
length of nose from eye to tip, 4in. ; length from elbow to top of
shoulder, llin.; length of ear from tip to set on at skull, 5£in.

Mr. G. Thorpe-Bartram’s Bogle: Weight, 731b.; height at shoulder,
25£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 41£in.; length of tail, 15^in.;
girth of chest, 32in.; girth of loin, 24£in.; girth of head, 20in.; girth of
forearm, 9in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, llin.; girth of
muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 10£in.; girth of neck
midway between head and shoulders, 19in.; length of nose from eye to
tip, 4fin. ; length from elbow to top of shoulder, 12£in.; length of ear
from tip to set on at skull, 6£in.﻿The Black Curly-Coated Retriever.

163

Chapter XXXIII.—THE BLACK CURLY-COATED
RETRIEVER.

By Corsincon.

There are few handsomer dogs than a good specimen of this breed,
such, for instance, as Toby, Trne, X L, Muswell-Butterfly, or Chicory,
with their compact forms, neat clean legs, and coats of jetty black, per-
fectly regular crisp little nigger curls, level, thick, and clustering over
every part from ears to end of tail, as though clothed with the heads of
so many prize piccaninnies.

How the variety originated I do not pretend to say with any degree of
certainty, for if we turn to the pedigrees of our most noted specimens we
find ourselves very soon at the end of a blind alley, even their immediate
progenitors being, as a rule, identified by their owner’s name, and not by
pedigree.

That they are compounded of several elements that are only just
beooming so thoroughly commingled as to breed with any certainty of
result, I have the experience of breeders to warrant me in believing ;
for, however good two specimens may be in that great desidera-
tum — coat, for instance — the percentage of their produce equally
good in that respect has been small. This, however, the further we
get from the different sources originally resorted to, and the closer
we keep to those having in a high degree the properties in common
which we desire to propagate, beoomes altered, and soon, if not now,
we will be able to rely on securing good and level litters, with merely
an occasional pup throwing baok, which should in all cases be carefully
weeded out.

I am of opinion that the crisp ourly ooat has been obtained from
the old olose-ourled English water spaniel, whioh one looks for in vain
now in the olasses set apart at our shows for this breed. Their plaoe is
now usurped by a olass of dog with a ooat I should oall “ irregular ” for
want of a better term, for it is neither flat, wavy, nor ourled, and in other
points as well as ooat widely differing from the old English water spaniel
as described by Youatt and “Stonehenge.” The latter in body, carriage,

if 2﻿164

British Dogs.

as well as in coat, much resembling the modern curly retriever, making
due allowance for the improvements produced by careful breeding for
competition for twelve or fifteen years.

There are, I know, many who think the retriever owes his remarkably
ourly coat to the Irish water spaniel; against this we have the recorded
opinion of that high authority on Irish spaniels, Mr. McCarthy, that
these dogs will not bear a cross with other breeds, and that the cross with
the setter, spaniel, Newfoundland, or Labrador, which would be the most
likely to be resorted to to produce the retriever, “ completely destroys
the coat, ears, tail, and symmetry.”

From Mr. McCarthy’s experience his opinion must have great weight,
and yet against that a case came under my personal notice which, as
far as a single case can, controverts that opinion. About thirteen years
ago I sent to my brother, a farmer in the west of Scotland, a pure-bred
Irish spaniel maiden bitch; she proved a most excellent all-round
dog, good alike at questing and retrieving, and just the thing for a one-
dog sportsman, and that led to the desire to breed from her; but as there
were no dogs of the same breed in the locality she was sent to a retriever
with a considerable amount of Gordon setter blood in him. I some years
afterwards saw two of the produce ; both were jet black, and with most
perfect curly coats, and one kept and worked by my brother was as clever
as he was in some points good looking ; but I cannot claim for him excel-
lence in symmetry—a point which, with all respect to my friend Mr. J. S.
Skidmore and other partisans of the Irish spaniel, I think that dog remark-
ably deficient in.

Among the exhibitors of this retriever that have been prominent as
winners of late years are: Mr. J. W. Morris, Rochdale ; Mr. F. J.
Staples-Brown, Brashfield; Mr. J. H. Salter, Tolleshunt D’Arcy; Mr.
G. Thorpe-Bartram, Braintree; Mr. W. Arkwright, Sutton Scarsdale;
Mr. E. Ellis, Doncaster; Mr. S. Darby, Tiverton; and Mr. W. A. How,
Whitwick, all of whom possess first-class specimens. Mr. Morris’s True
and X L have often properly figured at the head of their respective cham-
pion classes. True is closely matched by Mr. How’s champion Toby,
the subject of our illustration, and Mr. Thorpe-Bartram’s Nell is, in
the opinion of many judges, quite equal, if not superior, to X L, and
Mr. Tom B. Swinburne’s young bitch Chicory, by Mr. Salter’s King
Koffee, bids fair to surpass both, having youth on her side, and being, in﻿The Black Curly-Coated Retriever.

165

my opinion, a model retriever. She is a nice size, well built, without waste
or coarseness, well ribbed, with excellent back and loins, a good chest,
and legs that are simply faultless; her coat, too, is first-rate, and even
her tail to its end, both upper and under side, is thickly covered with
small perfect curls.

Mr. How’s Toby has been before the public since 1874, when he
began what has proved to be an extraordinary successful career by
taking first at both the Nottingham and the Birmingham shows. He was
described in the “Country” report of Brighton Show, 1876, in these
terms : ‘ ‘ His head is nearly faultless ; he is good in limbs, well formed in
body, and seems just made for his business, being neither too light for
hard work nor too clumsy to clear a dyke or a gate with a hare in his
mouth, and to this I may add that his coat is very good.”

The value of the points differs from the wavy-coated as follows :

In the head the skull is less wide thoughout and the muzzle rather
narrower at the nose.

The coat is entirely different, consisting of short crisp curls all over
the body and tail; the face covered with short smooth hair—there must
be no topknot. The eye should be hazel brown or darker, a yellow eye
which we have seen in otherwise good specimens mars the appearance of
the dog and is very objectionable.

The tail should be thick at the root and tapering to a fine point, carried
straight and stiffly and covered with small ourls, not feathered or bushy ;
but many good dogs of the breed have this fault.

The colour must be all black, but a small white spot on the chest
ought not to disqualify.

With the exception of coat and the fact that the muzzle is narrower, the
points of the wavy-coated apply to this ; the face, forehead, and
muzzle is covered with short hair only, the curls beginning from the
occiput, and they should be free from any trace of the Irish spaniel top-
knot. There should be entire freedom from flew, and a yellow or light
eye is objectionable.

In all retrievers temper and tractability are to be considered, but
indications of the first only can be seen in the show ring, and to test
their ability in seeking and retrieving, in whioh a good nose, with per-
severance, pluck, and a soft mouth, are requisite, we must see him in the
field.﻿﻿{IC.C.S.B. 1876)—Dam. Mr.﻿British Dogs.

166

The following are particulars of the measurements of Toby and other
good specimens of the breed :

Mr.W. H. How’s Toby: Age, 5f years; weight, 891b.; height at shoulder
24^in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 40in. ; length of tail, 17£in.;
girth of chest, 35in.; girth of loin, 30in. ; girth of head, 19in. ; girth of
forearm, 9£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, ll£in. ; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 12in. ; length of ear, 4in.;
width of ear, 3in.

Mr. W. H. How’s Soot: Age, 2£ years; weight, 811b.; height at
shoulder, 23in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 39in.; length of tail,
15£in. ; girth of chest, 33in.; girth of loin, 29in. ; girth of head, 16in.;
girth of forearm, 8in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
9£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 10£in.

Mr. Thorpe-Bartram’s' Lulu : Age, 6 years ; weight, 751b.; height at
shoulder, 26£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 40£in.; length of
tail, 17£in.; girth of chest, 33in. ; girth of loin, 28in. ; girth of head,
20|in. ; girth of forearm, 8£in. ; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, llin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, lOin.; length from comer of eye to end of nose, 4fin.; length
from elbow to top of shoulder blade, 13oin.; length of ear from tip to
set on at skull, 5£in.

Mr. Thorpe-Bartram’s Nell : Height at shoulder, 22Hn. ; length from
nose to set on of tail, 36£in.; length of tail, 15in.; girth of chest, 28in. ;
girth of loin, 23in.; girth of head, 17in. ; girth of forearm, 8in.; length
of head from occiput to tip of nose, lOin.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 10£in.; length from corner of eye to end
of nose, 4in. ; length from elbow to top of shoulder blade, 12£in.; length
of ear from tip to set on at skull, 5£in. ; girth of neck, 16in.

Mr. S. Darby’s Tewrl •. Age, 3 years; weight, 801b.; height at
shoulder, 24£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 43in. ; length of tail,
16£in.; girth of chest, 31£in.; girth of loin, 25£in.; girth of head,
18^in.; girth of forearm, 8in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 12in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, lOin.

Mr. Tom Swinburne’s Chicory: Age, 2 years ; weight, 761b. ; height
at shoulder, 24£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 41in. ; length of
tail, 15fin. ; girth of chest, 30 Jin.; girth of loin, 22in.; girth of head,
15in.; girth of forearm, 7in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of﻿The Norfolk Retriever.

167

nose, lOfin.; girth of muzzle midway between between eyes and tip
of nose, 9£in.

Mr. J. H. Salter’s champion King Koffee : Age, about 5 years; weight,
751b.; height at shoulder, 27in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 39£in.;
length of tail, 18in.; girth of chest, 33fin. ; girth of loin, 26in. ; girth
of head, 18fin.; girth of forearm, 7fin. ; length of head from occiput
to tip of nose, 10in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip
of nose, 10£in.

Chapter XXXIV.—THE NORFOLK RETRIEVER.

By Saxon.

To the preceding varieties we now add another, which “Saxon,” a Nor-
folk sportsman, claims as peculiar to his county. Of the correctness of so
doing, however, we have some doubt, for although retrievers answering
his description may be more plentiful in Norfolk than elsewhere, they
are met with often enough in all parts of the country. He says :

“ There is no doubt that dog-shows have done much towards improving
the various breeds of dogs ; hut there are still Borne counties which are,
so to speak, outside the magic circle of shows, and in these counties the
improvement is not so manifest. Norfolk is one of them, and though it
is a first-rate county for shooting of all kinds, yet at the same time, from
a show point of view, its dogs are not up to the mark.

“ It is well known that the retriever is not a distinct breed, and purity
of blood, therefore, can only exist so far as the strain is concerned. In
spite of this there is a strong family likeness visible in most good speci-
mens of the so-called Norfolk retriever.

“ For many a long year Norfolk has been celebrated for its wildfowl
shooting. On broad, river, sea-coast, and estuary, wildfowl abound during
the winter months, and unassisted by boat or dog the gunner would lose
by far the greater part of the fowl he shot. In rough weather, when the
fowl are most easy of access, the use of a boat in many instances becomes
difficult, not to say dangerous and impossible, and some kind of dog,﻿168

British Dogs.

therefore, became necessary to the fowler of olden times. The old-
fashioned pointer, so steady and good after partridges in the long hand-
reaped stubbles, failed signally in most instances when the thermometer
hung feelingly in the neighbourhood of zero and the beard of the
shooter was white with icicles and hoar frost. It was not his trade, and
he knew it. A hardier dog was necessary, and one with a rougher coat.
The old-fashioned English water-spaniel was undoubtedly good at flush-
ing the birds from reed-beds and the like, but for all-round work his
impetuosity would be against him. Something more Bedate than all
spaniel blood was required, and yet the dash and resolution of the genuine
spaniel should be retained. By continual crossing—frequently accidental
and still more frequently injudicious—by a strong infusion of Irish water-
spaniel blood, with here and there a tinge of the Labrador, the necessary
animal was by degrees manufactured.

“ Such is my theory concerning the origin of the Norfolk retriever. Now
for a description of the dog. The colour is more often brown than black,
and the shade of brown rather light than dark—a sort of sandy brown,
in fact. Coat curly, of course, and the curls hardly so close and crisp
as in the show retriever of the present day, but inclined to be open and
woolly. The coat is not long, however, and across the back there is often
a saddle of straight short hair. In texture the coat is inclined to be
coarse, and it almost invariably looks rusty and feels harsh to the touch.
This, however, may in some measure be due to neglect. The head is
heavy and wise-looking, the muzzle square and broad; ears large, and
somewhat thickly covered with long curly hair. The limbs stout and
strong, with large and well-webbed feet. The tail is usually docked like
a spaniel’s, but not so short. This seems to be quite a keeper’s custom,
and probably originated from the fact that, to an inexperienced eye, the
tail of a puppy generally appears too long for the dog. However, although
docking the tail improves the appearance of a spaniel, in my opinion it
completely spoils the symmetry of a retriever. I remember once asking
a Norfolk keeper’s opinion of a very handsome flat-coated retriever I had.
After examining the dog carefully, the man said, ‘ Well, sir, he would be
a rare nice-looking dog if you only cut half-a-yard off his tail.’ I need
hardly add that I did not act on the suggestion.

‘ ‘ When white appears on the chest it is more frequently in the form of
a spot or patch than a narrow streak. They are usually rather above﻿Liver-coloured Retrievers.	169

than below the medium size and are strong compact dogs. As a rule,
they are exceedingly intelligent and tractable, capaple of being trained
to almost anything, both in the way of tricks and with the gun. In
temperament they are lively and cheerful, making excellent companions ;
and it is very rarely that they are found sulky or vicious. When only
half-trained they are apt to be headstrong and impetuous, and, though
naturally with a strong retrieving instinct, are often a little inclined
to be hard-mouthed. This defect can be traced to two causes. It may
be the result of injudicious breeding from hard-mouthed parents, or it
may arise from careless or slovenly handling in their young days.
However, when they are wanted almost exclusively for wildfowl
shooting, this failing is not of so much moment, for they will be
principally used for retrieving birds that fall in the water, and, as fowl
are for the most part very tough birds, the rough grip as a dog seizes a
duck will not cause much mischief, and while swimming the most
inveterate “ biter ” will seldom give his birds a second nip. For wild-
fowl shooting they are admirable. Their resolute nature renders them
most determined in hunting coots, moor-hen and half-fowl, as the gunners
call many of the smaller members of the anas tribe, for which their too
limited knowledge of natural history cannot supply a name. When
accustomed to sea-shore Bhooting they will face a rough sea well, and
they are strong swimmers, persevering, and not easily daunted in their
search for a dead or wounded fowl.”

Chapter XXXV.—LIVER-COLOURED
RETRIEVERS.

By Corsincon.

These also are smooth, or wavy and curly-coated. Of the former I
have not seen a good specimen exhibited for a considerable time, the
few I have seen being coarse, and apparently half bred spaniels. Several
good specimens of curly coated ones have at different times appeared﻿British Dogs.

170

at shows ; the best I have seen being Nero, the property of Mr. Bullook,
Prescot, Lancashire, and Mr. R. J. LI. Price, of Ehiwlas, Bala, has
shown several good ones, and now Mr. McKenzie’s curly-coated Garnet
is the best of this variety. The following are his measurements :

Mr. L. McKenzie’s Garnet: Age, 18 months; weight, 781b.; height
at shoulder, 24£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 43in.; length
of tail, 17in. ; girth of chest, 30in.; girth of loin, 25in. ; girth of
head, 18in.; girth of forearm, 8in.; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, ll£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, lOin.

Chapter XXXVI. —THE RUSSIAN RETRIEVER.

By Corsincon.

A few years ago the Russian retriever was often met with at our shows,
and Mr. E. B. Southwell’s Czar scored a good number of first prizes in
the variety classes, but for two seasons past I do not recollect to have
seen a specimen at any show.

I believe “ Idstone’s ” is the only book on the dog in our language that
has deigned to notice this breed. And “ Idstone ” very summarily dis-
misses him thus: “I recollect seeing one of them at a battue, which
attempted to fetch a hare from a thick brake, and became so entangled
amongst the thorns and ‘ burs,’ that the beaters had to cut away a
quantity of.his coat to liberate him, and in the confusion the hare was
lost. Further comments on the Russian retriever for this country is
needless.”

A single glance at the dog would show anyone that he is of no use in a
thick brake of thorns, briars, or whins, but it does not follow that he
is of no use in this country; and the anecdote related by “Idstone”
seems to me rather to reflect on the man who put the dog to work for
which he was so evidently unsuited than on the dog. We have unques-
tionably dogs far better fitted for retrieving under any conditions in wood
or wild, on land or from water, than the Russian retriever, but as a﻿The Russian Retriever.

171

distinct variety we have room for him if only as a companion and guard,
using him as a retriever under suitable conditions when required.

I have said that in dog books, in that of “ Idstone” alone is he referred
to, but “ Stonehenge ” gives a woodcut of a Russian setter crossed with
English setter, which appears to me a modification of the Russian
retriever.

The Russian retriever is a large leggy dog, very squarely built, with
an excess of hair all over him, long, thick, and inclining to curl, a large
short head, round and wide in the skull, rather short and square in the
jaw, not unlike a poodle. The ears are medium sized, pendulous, heavily
covered with hair; the legs are straight, covered with long hair front
and back, like an Irish water spaniel. The eyes and whole face are
covered with long hair, like a modern Skye terrier, but more abundantly.
The coat throughout is long and dense, and requires great care to keep it
in anything like order, as it readily gets felted.

They are generally extremely docile, very intelligent, and show great
power of scent, and for “tricks” of retrieving from land or water
excellent, and they make good watch dogs, and it is only as companion
dogs they are likely to take a place in this country. I have known
three that I consider good specimens, namely, Mr. E. B. Southwell’s
Czar ; one the property of Mr. Pople, of the British Hotel, Perth ; and
one that met with a tragic end, having been burnt to death in a fire which
destroyed the house of his owner in Villiers-street, Strand. I should say
the height of each referred to would be about 26in. at shoulder, and the
colour throughout a grey.﻿EXHIBITING.

Dog Shows and Dog Judging, and Standard of
Excellence by which to Judge.

Including :

of Shows.	j. The Judges: their Elec-

and Manage-	tion.

4. Judging by Points.

5. Scale of Points.

-

XXXVII.— THE HISTORY OF DOG
SHOWS.

By Corsincon.

Dog shows have now been established in this country just twenty years,
for, although gatherings of fanciers at favourite haunts to compare the
merits of their dogs were common enough long before that date, the dog
show at Newcastle, in June, 1859, is looked upon as the first really publio
exhibition of the sort, and the history of dog shows begins from that date.
I am not sure, however, that some valuable hints might not be taken from
the meetings of “ the canine fancy ” in what I may call the pre-historio
age of dog shows. Those convivial meetings, where very often the dogs
were only shown because of the pride the owner felt in their possession,
and the considerable share of the praise bestowed upon them, whioh he
felt justified in appropriating to himself, were of course held at public
houses, and, doubtless, owners of celebrated dogs were often subsidised
by the landlord to appear on the scene with their stock, as an attraction
to customers in general who were possessed of doggy proclivities. I

j. History
2. Objects
ment.

Chapter﻿The History of Dog Shows.

173

have “ dropped in,” as Paul Pry would put it, to many such meetings,
in some of the large towns of England, and been thus introduced to many
notable dogs, and thereby picked up many a “ wrinkle.” Such gather-
ings still take place, and, although their fame has been eclipsed by the
splendour of our more imposing modem Bhows, there were always to be
found at them good specimens, and men who could discuss the merits and
properties or points of a dog seriatim, and it was thus each specimen
was judged and relegated to his proper position among the canine celebrities
of the day. At these pseudo private shows the exhibitors were all supposed
to be not only fanciers, but judges, and, when matches were made, the
match makers were also the judge makers, and he—the judge—was ex-
pected to say in what properties the dog he selected for honours excelled
his less fortunate opponent.

These are two important points : the election of the judge by the
exhibitors, and the judging by the individual points or properties,
which I may hereafter refer to more fully, merely remarking now that,
as a very considerable section of those who have taken an interest in dog
shows is in favour of both plans, it becomes a duty to discuss their
merits. Probably, the desire of those who first took an active part in
Bhows was to raise their character in every way above mere pothouse
affairs, and such an object was most commendable ; but is it quite
certain that in avoiding the Scylla of low associations they have managed
to steer clear of the Charybdis of respectable but dull incompetence
cunningly mixed with oraft ? Most certainly the letters of complaint
with which that portion of the press dealing fully with the subjeot teems
indicate a very general discontent with things as they are, and the scores
of good men who go in for dog showing for a time with enthusiasm,
and afterwards retire with silent disgust, emphasise the written com-
plaints, and strengthen the suspicion that reform is needed.

As previously stated, although dog Bhows sprung from the meetings of
the “fancy” in sanded parlours, where they had long been deeply rooted,
the fact is generally ignored. It is felt to be inconvenient in this, as in
so many things else, to trace the pedigree too curiously, lest the low origin
might be found inconsistent with existing pride. So, just as many people
would scorn to acknowledge an ancestor before the advent of William the
Conqueror, the birth of dog shows is in polite circles dated Newcastle,
June 28, 1859.﻿174

British Dogs.

This, which the Kennel Club Stud Book describes as “ the first dog
show ever held,” was organised by Messrs. Shorthose and Pape, at the
suggestion of Mr. E. Brailsford. Competition was limited to pointers
and setters, and there were sixty entries, and only two prizes ; but there
were no less than six judges—three for setters and three for pointers—a
great contrast from present practice, where frequently one judge has as
many as thirty classes to deal with.

The Newcastle show was followed in the autumn of the same year by
one in Birmingham, organised by Mr. E. Brailsford, and including more
varieties. The following year a much more extended schedule was
issued, embracing thirteen classes for non-sporting dogs. The extension
was fully justified by results, the public responding liberally by their
entries and their presence, and steady progress continued to mark the
history of Birmingham shows, so that, in a few years, those who had
taken an interest in it, finding it advisable they should have a “ looal
habitation” as well as a name, formed themselves into a company and
built the Curzon Hall, where, since 1865, the shows have continued to be
held ; and success, as far as entries and attendance, never fails, and, in-
deed, both are only limited by the size of the building—thus showing how
strongly popular the Birmingham exhibition is. There are doubtless
several reasons for this. Birmingham is exceptionally well situated, and
contemporaneous with its dog show is the world-famed show of fat cattle
at Bingley Hall. These two exhibitions assist and feed each other, with
both exhibitors and gate money, from the thousands who flock to this
great midland centre from a wide and thickly-peopled district, and most
of whom have a knowledge of and an interest in live stock. It would,
however, be unfair to attribute the undoubted success of Birmingham
shows entirely to these accidental circumstances. Mr. George Beach, the
secretary, is a gentleman of great business ability, and to his excellent
management much of the success is fairly attributable. No one of ex-
perience in such matters will, I think, hesitate to allow that on the whole
this show is thoroughly well managed, and in many respects a model for
imitation ; and I state this with the greater pleasure because I take
strong exception to several of their rules, whioh I shall refer to further
on.

Many other places followed the example of Birmingham, and in 1861
we had the monster Leeds show of unhappy memory.﻿The History of Dog Shows.

J75

The Messrs. Jennings, of Belle Yne Gardens, Manchester, followed the
same year, and continued to hold shows in their gardens at intervals np
to 1875 ; but, I presume, finding they failed to pay, like prudent men of
business, dropped them. The great increase in the number of shows held
is, however, due to their being made adjuncts to the attractions of
agricultural shows, for not one in fifty is strong enough to stand alone,
whereas, as an addition to a show of live stock in general, they
undoubtedly draw and add to the good of the whole.

In the metropolis dog shows are on quite a different footing, and, as
far as visitors go, must depend on their own attractions; and the average
Londoner is equally careless about and ignorant of all live stock. Hence
the necessity that such shows in London should be under the fostering
care of a rich society.

The Kennel Club occupy this position, and since their first show at the
Crystal Palace we have had yearly, and even twice a year, in London,
shows which, if not unequalled—and op the whole I think they have
been—have not been excelled by any in the kingdom, but I should
be quite prepared to hear the Americans claiming superiority. The
general management of the Kennel Club shows is unexceptionable; in
Mr. George Lowe we have a secretary as courteous as he is capable ; and
under the able management of Mr. John Douglas mistakes are reduced to
a minimum. Having thus very briefly, and in outline only, sketched the
history of dog shows, I would presently direct attention to their objects
and management.

Dog shows have grown to an extent of which their founders had pro-
bably no anticipation. It will be well within the limit if I say there is
now an average of two a week the year round in this country ; and if
we take the average of the prize money offered as .£200, we have over
<£20,000 of money to be competed for in the course of the year ; and
if we average the number of entries at 200, at each show costing in
entry fees and carriage £1, the prize money offered would exactly oover
these expenses; but not more than one-third reaches the committees
in Bhape of the entrance fees, the railway companies and others absorbing
the rest, so that the prize money, after all, has to be made up from
the general publio in the shape of gate money and by private subscrip-
tion. There is always, therefore, considerable monetary risk to the
promoters, as in every speculative business; for, although a fairly﻿British Dogs.

176

approximate estimate of the outlay may be made, much of the income
depends on counter attractions simultaneously offering themselves, and
also on that most uncertain of all things in this country, the weather.
It is quite clear, then, that promoters run a risk. It is also clear
enough that the money to be won by an exhibitor is nothing equal to
the outlay—the cost of purchase, preparing for and exhibiting, being so
great that only occasionally is even the last item of expense covered by
the prize money. The profit, however, is got in another way. The
astute exhibitor knows that the prizes carry a higher remuneration than
the mere money value. They raise the prestige of his kennel, and bring
grist to the mill in the shape of stud fees and immensely enhanced
prices for his stock.

Of course there are hundreds of exhibitors with whom dog showing is so
pnrely a hobby, that they seek for the honour alone; bnt no matter with
which of these views the pursuit is followed, the object sought is of equal
value (for Kudos is to the one equal to cash to the other) and every means
possible should be taken to insure the end being gained in a fair field with
no favour and by merit alone. It is my object to inquire whether the
present methods of arriving at the results all Bhould aim at, and all
profess to desire, are the best possible and practicable, and to do so it is
necessary to consider the various sections of the subject and those features
in the present system which most frequently give rise to complaint and
controversy. To this end we must review,' in a general way, the con-
stitution and arrangement of dog shows, the election of judges, the
means and manner of judging, and other questions bearing on the very
important object of all the machinery of dog shows—the selection of the
best dog for the highest honours.

These embrace the often discussed questions of public versus private
judging, single-handed, by two or more judges, the use by the judge
of a catalogue, owners leading the dogs out, the system of electing
judges, and judging by points, to the consideration of which I shall now
proceed.﻿Objects and Management of Dog Shows.

Chapter XXXVIII.—OBJECTS AND MANAGE-
MENT OF DOG SHOWS.

The one great object which should take precedence of all others, and the
one whioh is universally professed, is the improvement of the various
breeds.

There are many other objects which naturally associate themselves
with the principal one and act as auxiliaries to its attainment, and are
in themselves not merely innocent, but laudable.

That dog shows are an excellent means of arriving at the end sought
for is, I think, beyond dispute, for they are the only convenient, and for
most people the only possible, means of comparing the excellence of their
own with the excellence of others ; and discovering, it may be, faults
they were blind to, and good points previously unthought of, and giving
a stimulus to the correction of the one, and the cultivation of the other.

When dog shows fail in their highest object, it is on account of that
object being lost sight of, or made subservient to other and meaner ones,
even the grossest blunder a judge can commit can do no more than prove
a temporary check ; and frequently, through the publicity given to them
by the free criticism of the press, such blunders prove a blessing, being
made prominent as danger signals.

So long, however, as men are merely human, it is not to be expected
that in carrying out Buch extensive sohemes as dog shows, their objects
can be altogether unmixed.

Men, like their dogs, are intensely emulative animals, and dog shows
provide a field where that attribute can be exercised in a most interesting
manner. Merit, too, has its rewards to look forward to. Prizes and
future profit stimulate the exertions of many; some few seek only the
glory and honour of being foremost in the race ; and for all, the shows
provide a medium of pleasant re-union for those of congenial tastes, who
would not otherwise meet.

Another objeot influencing the promoters of shows, and a perfectly
legitimate and laudable one, is to benefit the town in which it is to be
held. Our great towns oompete with each other for the visits of the
Royal Agricultural Society and kindred associations, and the getting up

H﻿British Dogs.

178

of a dog show is often undertaken in the same spirit of loyalty to the
interests of a locality, and this need in no way interfere with the higher
object generally professed.

Of course there is not the slightest objection to any person or persons
getting up a dog show as a mere spectacle and speculation, if he or they
pretend to nothing else ; but I do not think this is ever done. Therefore,
it behoves exhibitors to consider the probabilities of the professed objects
being the true ones, and the way in which such shows are put before the
public, got up, and conducted, will pretty surely indioate the real object.
Those exhibitors who support purely speculative shows, to find they
cannot get paid their prize money, are in a similar position to a man
who, attending a race course, invests his money with anybody who
chooses to hold up an umbrella. Both are pretty sure to get “ welched,”
and instead of receiving sympathy, will be laughed at.

My contention is, that without being behind the scenes, an acute
observer and accurate reasoner, from what is open to every one, can
easily come to a fairly correct conclusion how far the professed objects
of those who take upon themselves the direction of dog shows is true,
and whether the means adopted to attain those objects do not confute
the profession by rendering such attainment impossible.

I do not expect to find in any case self interest wholly absent. In
bodies of men, small or large, we generally find a mixture of the sordid
with the pure, the mean with the lofty ; nor is absolute perfection to be
looked for anywhere.

The cleanest com that e’re was dicht,

May hae some piles o’ c’aff in.

But it should be the care of all to secure the higher object from
being obscured by the unworthy, or even the less worthy.

On the organisation of some shows the following half serious, half
humorous, sketoh contributed to the Cormtry is not without a broad
foundation of truth, and may fairly find a place here.

“ First of all we have the organisers—whoever they may be—who first
moot the idea that ‘ it would be a good thing to get up a dog Bhow in
Xennelborough.’ The first thing needed is

A sort of managing committee,

A board of grave responsible directors,

A secretary good at pen and ink,

And a treasurer, of coarse, to keep the chink﻿Objects and Management.

179

and Mr. Boniface, of the Stirrup Cup—shrewd man—knowing how very dry
arguments are apt to be, and how thirst-provoking to their users, gives
a room wherein the arrangements and all the coming glories of the show
shall be evolved from the inner consciousness of the ‘managing com-
mittee.’ And here, at the very start—human passions—the noble and the
mean, the generous and the selfish, come into play, and for the most part
the higher natures bear down the meaner and make the scheme respect-
able ; and it is only by cunning devices, undreamt-of by the single
minded, that the selfish carry their ends.

“This, I am convinced, is largely true, for in human nature, imperfect
though it be, the good predominates, and it is only those people with
unwashed eyes who see nothing but the faults of others.

“ Exhibitors and others—newspaper reporters not excepted—are apt to
enlarge on the shortcomings and failings, and forget the good that has
been done, in thinking too much of the good that might have been, but is
omitted. Before the show becomes an accomplished fact there has been
on the part of many considerable sacrifice of time and money, and muoh
anxiety, to be continued till all is over and the cash book balanced. In
the number of active members, no doubt, there is too often the self-
seeker, the man who by hook or by crook always manages to get at least
one olaBs in the schedule to suit himself ; and when a committee is cursed
with a few such, farewell to the fair character of the show, for these
fellows will so play the game of “ Tickle me, Toby, and I’ll tickle thee,”
that, what with classes and conditions to suit certain dogs and a pliant
judge, their nominee, the ring parade is worse than a farce. It is an
acted lie of the meanest description. ’ ’

I do not intend to go into mere details of management, but rather to
point out as briefly as possible some too common aots of mismanage-
ment that must of necessity defeat the object of shows if that object be
the improvement of dogs.

1.	The appointment of inexperienced and incompetent judges.

JudgeB should have a wide experience of dogs, exoept those who limit

their deoisionB to one or a few varieties. Unfortunately there is a craze
with many to oocupy the position for sake of the kudos it is supposed
to give, and sooial influence is used to attain it, to the great hindrance
of dog improvement.

2.	The election of judges by a section only of exhibitors.

n 2﻿i8o

British Dogs.

Members of committee who elect the judges ought not to exhibit for
prizes. If they can afEord the sacrifice of time and money which they
are supposed to do for the furtherance of a great object, it is not asking
much from them to go a step further and show their animals not for
competition. In the case of a great body like the Kennel Club, who so
emphatically declare the sole object of their existence to be the improve-
ment of dogs, dog shows, and dog trials, this unquestionably should
be so.

3.	Dog shows should not be a mere market for the sale of puppies.

I am of opinion classes for litters, and also for single puppies, at least
for those under nine months, should be abolished. The result, especially
in shows of long duration, is the spread of distemper and other con-
tagious diseases, and canine mortality is immensely raised after every
show—buyers of pups soon lose them; this injures shows, and hinders
the development of their chief object in a double sense.

4.	Catalogues should in every case prove the means of identifying the
exhibits.

In this respect those issued by the Kennel Club are models to others ;
but scores are published with, in many cases, only the number of the
pen and the exhibitor’s name, and this often leads to the substituting of
one dog for another, and the crediting a stud dog with prizes he has
never won.

The Kennel Club catalogues would be improved by the colour and
markings being given in classes where this is necessary.

5.	Shows should not extend over four days, three would be better, and,
if puppies are included, not more than one day.

6.	In shows where the dogs are confined more than two days more
ample provision for their regular exercise should be provided.

7.	The Kennel Club, or some other authority which Bhould be of
national character, should adopt a standard of excellence in each breed.

8.	The judges appointed by such authority referred to in Clause 7
should be bound to judge by such standard.

9.	The dogs should be judged by points.

By this means only can the judge’s reasons for his decisions be seen
and understood, but as I shall go fully into this point further on, I pass
it for the present.﻿Election of Judges.

181

Chapter XXXIX.—THE JUDGES: THEIR
ELECTION, Etc.

In dog shows the judge is the central figure; not only does he pose) and
is sometimes posed) in the middle of the ring in which the aspirants to
fame are paraded, and where he and his doings are, for the time being,
the oynosure of all eyes, but his power reaches a much wider circle than
those immediately concerned, and the influence of his decisions is felt in
hundreds of cases outside the boundaries of shows. Take up any news-
paper wherein dogs are advertised for sale and see how the decision of a
judge is turned into coin of the realm ; how the fact of a prize having
been awarded an animal, or even to his grandmother, is emphasised and
capital made of it; and consider the vast (I believe an average of nearly
1000 dogs are weekly advertised in The Bazaar newspaper alone) business
done in dogs nowadays, and how greatly the ordinary purchaser is in-
fluenced by such facts as prizes having been won ; and at least one very
practical effect of the judge’s wide influence will he seen; and, if it is
further considered that on the strength of such prize winnings dogs are
largely bred from, another most important view of that influence pre-
sents itself.

What should be indelibly fixed on the minds of all concerned is that the
jndge’s power does not end, but really begins, with the distribution of
prizes, and that, therefore, his qualifications, the way in which he exercises
his functions, and his mode of election, cannot, in the best interests of
shows, be too carefully considered or too closely Bcrutinised, so long as
that is done in a broad and liberal spirit, and free from the mere desire to
oavil and find fault. I cannot take upon myself to define all the quali-
fications a judge should possess, but there are some which to be without
is to render him unfitted for the position.

There are men afflioted with “ colour blindness,” and I have seen men
attempting to judge dogs who were evidently afflioted with what I should
call “ oanine blindness”—an utter incapacity to distinguish between
corresponding and conflicting characteristics. What a muddle suoh men
make, and how deplorable the consequences ! These men may be the
best of good fellows, their honour uuimpeaohable, and their desire for﻿182

British Dogs.

the improvement of the dog great, but they lack the absolutely neoessary
qualification of a judge, and as such they are failures. The judge must
be a man of order, possessed of a natural ability for clear and accurate
comparison and rapid analysis; he must be able almost at a glance to
take in the whole animal, and roughly estimate its approach to his ideal
standard of excellence for the breed ; mentally dissect the several pro-
perties of each one, and place them in the order in which they approach
nearest to his idea of perfection. The qualifications necessary are partly
natural and partly acquired by experience—without a natural taste for
the class of animals he judges—together with an aptitude in the arrange-
ment of facts, and a power of analogy, no amount of experience will ever
give that quickness and decision absolutely necessary to be successful as
a judge.

There is a rather widespread opinion that to be a good judge a man
must first have been a successful breeder. That is I think a position
quite untenable. There is no doubt much to be gained by experience in
breeding. The really successful breeder—not the merely lucky breeder
—the man who starts to breed with a defined purpose, and keeps that
in view until he attains it, has gained much that will raise his qualifica-
tions as a judge ; but it does not make him one, for the simple fact
is, that that man was a judge to begin with. On the other hand, the
effect of such experience on some minds is narrowing and prejudicial,
and in all cases it requires the counteracting and correctional influence
of the experience of others.

That experience as a breeder is not absolutely necessary to the making
of a capable judge, I might put forward many instances in dog show
circles, but it is perhaps better to show the fact without drawing on
that source. Readers—at least country readers—must, many of them,
have known in the days when the butcher and the farmer dealt with
each other directly, and beasts and sheep were “ sold by hand,” many a
clever dealer who could value each of a herd to a fraction, and at a word
could tell in what points the animal was best and wherein wanting, and
yet such men may never have farmed an acre, and never bred either a
cow or a sheep. If we take the case of horse judging it is just the
same—it is not always either the breeder or the owner that is the best
judge, and there are many men who never even owned a “screw”
whose judgment is accurate and valuable. The experience gained by﻿Judges: their Election.

^3

breeding may be beneficial or prejudicial, but it can never make a man
a judge.

That the sort of judge I have feebly indicated as the right one is not
always elected it is needless for me to state.

When I ventured to say inexperienced judges should not be appointed,
I had no intention of suggesting that new judges should be forbidden the
ring. There are within my own knowledge many good judges of large
private experience who have not acted officially. But too often we see
men appointed purely from the accident of their position, without any
regard to fitness, and that is what should be discouraged.

I am of opinion that for shows that have a national character and
importance, the judges should be elected, not appointed, and the larger
the constituency of electors the less danger of the wrong man being
voted to the position. To take the case of the Kennel Club. It
is not sufficient for them to say, “ we publish our judges’ names
before entries close, and those who object to them need not exhibit.”
The Kennel Club court the support of the public, and it has been
liberally given. It has been very generally recognised that they
have undertaken useful work and deserve support; and even those who
think the position they occupy might be better filled, have too much
sympathy with their objects to oppose them. Hence they enjoy, to a
great extent, a monopoly, and people must exhibit at their shows or not
at all, unless an undesirable opposition is started ; for it can hardly be
with any intelligent hope of improving the dog that people dip their hands
in the Birmingham lottery bag.

The plan I propose, and it is one I have long publicly advooated, is to
let the exhibitors elect the judges, whereas at present these functionaries
are generally appointed by a very small section of them.

If, as often happens, there are ten judges to be elected, let there be
for eaoh section given to them individually, three men nominated by the
committee of the show, and let the votes go in with the entry papers; a
sub-committee would oount votes and publish the names of the elected
judges.

This is a practice of suoh long standing, and applied bo so many
things in this country, that I cannot think, as has been alleged, that
gentlemen would objeot to be nominated. It was also, when formerly
discussed, objected that it would lead to combinations of exhibitors﻿184

British Dogs.

electing men who would pledge themselves beforehand. I never could
believe in that danger, but the objection only applied to the proposition
that exhibitors should both nominate and elect.

My proposition is, to some extent, a compromise. The committee to
name thirty instead of ten men of whom they approve, and the exhibitors
to seleot from them. The plan has this further advantage, that exhibitors
approving of none of the three nominated in their section instead of
voting, might name three in the order in which they would like them
nominated for future shows, and this would be to some extent an index
of the public wishes for the Kennel Club.

		
Chapter XL.—JUDGING BY POINTS.

The newest and most brilliant luminary in canine literature, before
whom all past and present dealers in doggy lore must, sooner or later,
pale their ineffectual fires, is Mr. Vero Shaw, and he says, in his “ Pen
and Ink Sketches,” that on the subject of judging by points I am what
he terms “immense,” but that rumour says it is not from conviction,
but obstinacy, that I adhere to this “ unclean thing.”

Rumour and Mr. Shaw are both mistaken. My friend Mr. Shaw has
written a book all about dogs, and I particularly admire that portion
of it in which is described the several “points” of each breed and the
numerical value put upon them.

Now, I conceive that it is utterly impossible for any sane writer to so
minutely assess the value of each individual point and express it in those
dreadfnlly matter-of fact things, figures, if he did not intend them to be
used, and this is what Mr. Shaw does—“ one for his knob, two for his
heels ”—everything has an exact value, be it the chop of the bulldog or
the tail of the pug, you are told it to a fraction ; and, therefore, believing
my friend to be sane, I claim him on my side—that is, in favour of
judging by points.

Another strong opponent of the system has also committed himself,
although not so deeply. I refer to Mr. S. E. Shirley, M.P., chairman of﻿Judging by Points.

185

the Kennel Club. I never heard Mr. Shirley speak against the principle
of jndging by points, but he once said to me he thought life was too
short for its practice. Now Mr. Shirley has recently contributed to
Mr. Shaw’s book an article on collies, in which he most precisely lays
down the absolute numerical value of each point in that breed. Why
is this P figures of speech may be ornamental, but mere numerical figures
have to all but statisticians a dreary sameness about them, and plain
matter-of-factness which cannot be turned to ornament. I wonder what
Mr. Shirley’s reflections would be now if, when at school, his tutor had
said to him of the multiplication table, “ These figures are all very well
you know, and you had better learn them, but bear in mind you must
never think of making a practical use of them—life is much too short
for that.”

The simple fact is, judging by points is the only possible way of
judging at all, and to arrive at conclusions as to the respective merits of
the dogs for adjudication in any other way is mere guess work.

In the most ordinary friendly chats about dogs, when discussing their
relative merits, we say Bob’s head is better than Carlo’s, and Wagg is
better in loin than either, and such remarks are quite understood and
appreciated; it is a rough and loose way of judging by points, and the
application of the numerical value to eaoh point, as described in the
standard of excellence, is merely giving exactness to it, and facilitating
the work of striking a balance between the good and bad points, and more
readily, and with greater precision, awarding to each dog his proper plaoe
in the scale of merit.

Of course, we do not use pencil and paper every time we have to
deal with figures, but in intricate accounts mental arithmetic iB not
trusted to. And so it is in judging dogs; practice enables anyone with
any pretensions to fill the position of a judge, to weed out quickly
specimens so wanting in general excellence as to be “ out of the hunt,”
but in close competition—when the judge is supposed to be very
particular as to eaoh good and bad point of eaoh competitor—would it
not save time and ensure accuracy to put down, in a prepared tabular
form, the value put upon eaoh point seriatim, and add them up at the
finish P I do not think life is too Bhort for that; on the contrary,
I think this would prove a lengthening of life, by saving time.

An able opponent of point judging contends that in the exercise of his﻿British Dogs.

186

functions the judge is guided by an inborn faculty aided by years of
experience, and that his decisions should be received, accepted, and re-
spected without question by those not blest with such innate ability ; and
further, that it is not the duty of the judge to teach, nor is it in his
power to explain to the public, so that they can understand the pro-
cesses and stages by which he arrived at his conclusions. In fact that it
would be as fair to ask a clever prestidigitateur to explain how he accom-
plished his clever tricks and illusions as to ask a judge how he arrived at
his decisions—the former could but shrug his shoulders and re-perform
the trick as plainly as he could, and so with the judge, both performing
their work by the power of an inborn faculty aided by years of practice
and experience. On the contrary, I hold that the objects of shows being
what they profess to be, it is essentially the duty of the judge to instruct
the public, and that he is not at all in the same position as the performer
of sleight of hand tricks who has only to amuse. The judge may be
more fairly compared to an expert mechanic—one whose deftness and
rapidity of action in producing results wonderful to the uninitiated, can
yet intelligently explain every process from beginning to end, so that
anyone may understand.

Judging by points, too, has this advantage; it settles the question of
dual judging, by giving the opinion of both to the public in a concrete
form, and that of the arbitrator also on the point of difference on which
he was called upon to decide the cases where the two judges had
disagreed.

It settles the question of public versus private judging fairly well,
providing a more substantial feast than seeing the dogs walked round,
and acting as indicators to every step the judge took in going through
his duties. With this solatium to wounded feelings the disappointed
exhibitor could look with more equanimity on the secret conclaves of
Curzon Hall.

One objection I have heard urged against point judging is that it
would reduce judging to a dead level; there would, it is said, be a dull
stagnancy about it that would soon asphixiate shows.

I cannot see that there would be less difference of opinion under the
one system than under the other, nor would there be sameness in the
awards of the same man, nor more room for charges of inconsistency
then than now. It is unreasonable to expect perfection in the work﻿Judging by Points.

187

of any judge, and in judging by points the qualified man, whilst he
might vary in his valuation of points, would never be very far off the
mark.

The modus operandi of judging by points is so clearly shown by
“ Caractacus,” in his chapter on the bulldog, that I need not repeat
it here, but will in conclusion refer to a few general questions affecting
judging, and the manner of doing it.

What I may call the Birmingham system, as it is the only show of
importance, where it is now in vogue, is the election of the judges by a
small committee and the keeping of their names secret from the public and
exhibitors until the day on which they have to act arrives.

Concomitant with this secrecy respecting the judges, there is a great
parade made of keeping these gentlemen entirely ignorant as to the
identity of the dogs they are judging—plain chains and collars must be
worn by the dogs—no one but the committee, the judges, and the servants
of the committee, who lead the dogs, are admitted during the judging.
Even the press is excluded until noon, and then they are denied
catalogues and forbidden to approach or speak to a judge until he has
completed his labours; and altogether on the judging day at the
Birmingham show one feels that in Curzon Hall they are breathing an
atmosphere of suspicion as thick and unwholesome as Birmingham
vomits from any of her numerous tall chimneys. The great difficulty is
in deoiding which class—the judges, reporters, or exhibitors—is the most
suspected by this immaculate committee. I am disposed to think the
servants in the yellow striped vests are treated with the most confidence
at Birmingham.

The simplicity that supposes Buch ridioulous rules effective for the
avowed object is in harmony with the miserable spirit which considers
precautions against collusion between judge and exhibitor necessary.

The Birmingham oommittee oannot, for want of space, have public
judging, but here as elsewhere when the public cannot see for them-
selves, their representatives, the press, should oertainly have every
facility given to them to accurately and fully report facts to their clients
but the Birmingham committee seem like Otaheitan cooks, to think

No food is fit to eat
Till they have chewed it.

As far as the matters above referred to go, the Birmingham committee﻿British Dogs.

188

remain wrapped in the swaddling olothes of infancy, and are content
with the illusions of childhood.

It certainly requires no great exercise of that common sence of which
Birmingham, not without reason, boasts to show that it is utterly impos-
sible to prevent judges of experience knowing and recognising at a glance
dogs they have seen scores of times. Then why not put all dogs on an
equality, so far as can be done, by giving the judge a catalogue in his
hand ? If he can be influenced by ownership, it is not such ruleB as
obtain at Birmingham that will stop him in wrong doing, but, believing
as I do in the honour and integrity of judges, I hold you are materially
aiding him and forwarding the highest objects of shows by giving him
every item of information that can assist him in coming to a mature and
correct decision.

At Maidstone, Cork, the Irish Kennel Club, the Bulldog Club, and
other shows, catalogues are handed to the judges before they begin.
Personally, except when it is necessary to refer to age or some such
point, I have found them practically an encumbrance, and prefer
The Field duplicate judging book. The practice is nevertheless useful
in many ways, and most of all in that it disarms unworthy suspicion.

The kennel club have adopted public judging and the practice of
announcing their judges’ names before the entries close, and have been
largely followed by other committees, and I hope to see them go still
further and let their judges have catalogues to consult openly, and not as
has been the case in some instances, clandestinely.

The question of single or dual judging is not important if point judging
be adopted, but while this is not the case public opinion runs strongly in
favour of single judging, and I believe judges generally prefer it.﻿Standard of Excellence.

189

Chapter XLI.—STANDARD OF EXCELLENCE.

I.—Greyhound.

Points.

Head ..................... 10

Neck ..................... 10

Chest and forequarters ...	20

Loin and back ribs ....... 15

Hindquarters ............. 15

Legs and Feet ............ 15

Tail ...................... 5

Colour and coat........... 10

Total ................100

II.—Scotch Deerhound.

Points.

Head .................... 10

Ears and eyes ............ 5

Neck .................... 10

Chest and shoulders....	15

Back and ribs ........... 10

Hindquarters ............ 10

Legs and feet ........... 15

Tail ..................... 5

Colour and coat.......... 10

Symmetry ................ 10

Total .............. 100

III.—Irish Wolfhound.

Points.

Head (skull and jaw)	...	15

Neck, chest, and shoulders	15

Back, loins, and ribs...	15

Hindquarters ............. 10

Legs and feet ............ 10

Colour and ooat........ 10

Size and symmetry ........ 25

Total ................100

IV.—Rough Scotch Grey-
hound.

Same as Qreyhound.

V.—Lurcher.

Not shown or encouraged.

VI.—Whippet.

Same as Greyhound.

VII.—Siberian	Wolf-

hound.

Points.

Head ..................... 10

Eyes ...................... 5

Ears ................ ...	5

Neck ..................... 10

Chest, shoulders, and ribs 15

Back and loins ........... 15

Hindquarters ............. 10

Legs and feet ............ 10

Tail ...................... 5

Colour and coat............ 5

Symmetry.................. 10

Total ...	 100

VIII.—Persian Grey-

hound.

Points.

Head ....................  10

Eyes ...................... 5

Ears ...................... 5

Neck ...................... 5

Chest, ribs, and shoulders 10

Back and loins ........... 10

Hindquarters ............. 10

Legs and feet ............ 10

Tail ...................... 5

Colour and ooat........... 10

Symmetry and elegance ...	20

Total ...	 100﻿British Dogs.

i go

IX.—Bloodhound.

Head 			Points.  ...	15
Ears and eyes		... 10
Flews and dewlap		... 10
Neck 			5
Chest and shoulders		... 10
Back and back ribs		... 10
Legs and feet		... 20
Stern 			...	5
Colour and coat...		...	5
Symmetry 			... 10
Total 			... 100
X.—Foxhound. Head, &c			Points.  ...	15
Neck 			...	5
Shoulders and arms		... 10
Chest and ribs ...		... 10
Back and loins ...		... 10
Hindquarters		...	15
Legs and feet		... 15
Colour and coat ...		...	5
Stern 			...	5
Symmetry and condition		... 10
Total 			... 100
XI.—Otterhound. Skull 			Points. ... 10
Jaws 			... 10
Eyes 			...	5
Ears 			... 10
Chest and shoulders		...	15
Body and loins ...		...	15
Legs and feet		... 10
Coat 			... 10
Stem 			...	5
Symmetry and strength		... 10
Total 			... 100

XII.—Harrier.

Same pointB as Foxhound.

XIII.—Beagle.

	Points.
Head 		... 20
Ears 		... 10
Neck and throat		5
Shoulders 		...	15
Back and loins 		... 10
Hindquarters 		... 10
Legs and feet 		... 10
Colour and coat		... 10
Condition and symmetry	... 10
Total ...	... 100
XIV.—Basset.	Points.
Head (skull and jaws)	...	15
Eyes 		...	5
Ears 		...	5
Neck 		5
Chest and shoulders ...	...	15
Back, loins, and hindquarters 20	
Legs and feet 		... 20
Stem 		5
Colour and coat		... 10
Total ...	... 100

X V.—Dachshund.  Points.	
Head (skull,	muzzle, and
teeth)		 15
Eyes 			 5
Ears 			 5
Neck 			 5
Back 			 15
Breast			 10
Forelegs		 10
Hind legs ...		 10
Feet 			 10
Tail 			 5
Coat 			 5
Colour			 5
Total ...		100﻿Standard of Excellence.

191

XVI.—English Sette	r.		XIX.—Pointer.	
	Points.		Points.	
Skull 			10	Skull 		10
Nose 		...	5	Nose 		10
Ears, lips, and eyes ...	...	4	Ears, eyes, and lips		4
Neck 			6	Neck 		6
Shoulders and chest ...		15	Shoulders and chest		15
Back quarters and stifles	...	15	Back, quarters, and stifles	15
Legs, elbows, hocks ...		12	LegB, elbows, and hocks ...	12
Feet 			8	Feet 		8
Flag 			5	Stern 		5
Texture of coat and feather		5	Coat 		3
Colour			5	Colour		5
Symmetry and quality	...	10	Symmetry 		7
Total				100	Total 		100
XVII.—Black and Tan		Or	XX.—Black Spaniel.	
Gordon Setter.			Points.	
	Points.		Head 		10
Head, including ears, eyes,			Ears 		5
and nose		...	20	Eyes 		5
Neck 			5	Neck 		5
Shoulders 	  Chest			10  10	Chest, back, and loins Shoulders, legs, and feet ...	25  20
Barrel, baok, and loins		15	Tail 		5
Quarters and stifles ...		10	Coat, colour, and feathering	15
Legs and feet 			10	General appearance and	
Flag 			5	symmetry			10
Coat and colour			5		
Symmetry 			10	Total 		100
Total 			100	XXI.—Cocker Spaniel.	
XVIII.—Irish Setter.			Same valuation of points.	
	Points.			
Head 	  Eyes 			10  4	XXII.—Clumber Spaniel.  Points.	
Ears 			4	Head 		20
Neok 			8	Ears 		10
Body, including shoulders			Neck 		5
and loins			20	Length		15
Fore legs 			10	Shoulders and chest		10
Hind legs 			12	Back 		10
Feet 		...	10	Legs and feet 		15
Stern 		...	5	Stern 		5
Coat 		...	7	Coat 		5
General appearance ...	...	10	Colour		5
Total 		• • •	100	Total 		100﻿192

British Dogs.

XXIII.—Sussex Spaniel.

Skull 		Points. ...	15
Eyes 		5
Nose 		... 10
Ears 		5
Neck 		...	5
Shoulders and chest ...	... 10
Back and back ribs ...	... 10
Legs and feet 		... 10
Tail 		... 10
Colour		... 10
Coat 		...	5
Symmetry 		...	5
Total 		... 100

XXIV.—Norfolk Spaniel.

Same as the cocker.

XXV.—Irish Water

Spaniel.	Points.
Head and topknot		 15
Face and eye		 10
Ears 			 10
Chest and shoulders		 to
Back and quarters		 10
Legs and feet		 10
Tail 			 10
Coat and colour ...		 20
Symmetry 			 5
Total 		... 100
XXVI.—English	Water
Spaniel.	,	Points.
Head and muzzle		 15
Eye 			 5
Nose 			 5
Ears 			 5
Neck 			 5
Chest and shoulders		 15
Back and loins ...		 15
Tail 			 5
Legs and feet		 15
Coat and colour ...		 15
Total ...	... 100

XXVII. — Wavy - Coated
Retriever, Black and

Liver.	points.

Head, muzzle, and nose ...	20

Ears and eyes .............. 5

Neck and shoulders ........ 10

Chest ..................... 10

Back, loins, and hindquarters 15

Legs and feet ............. 15

Tail ....................... 5

Coat and colour......... 10

Symmetry................ 10

Total ...	  100

XXVIII. — Curly - coated
Retriever, Black and

Liver.	PoiNm

Head and muzzle .......... 15

Ears and eyes ............. 5

Smallness and closeness of

curl in coat ........... 15

Neck ...................... 5

Chest and shoulders......	15

Back and loins............ 15

Hindquarters ............. 10

Stern ..................... 5

Legs and feet ............ 15

Total ................100

XXIX.-Norfolk Retriever.

The same as last, allowing for
difference in various points.

XXX.—Russian Retriever.

Judged by shape, Bize, coat, and
colour. Points have not been
applied.﻿DIVISION II.

Dogs useful to Man in other
Work than Field Sports.﻿﻿﻿>IR. A. G. JAMES’ ROUGH-COATED COLLEY “CARLYLE” (K.C.S.B. 851﻿GROUP I.

Dogs specially used by man as assistants in
his work.

Including:

1.	The Scotch Colley.

2.	The Smooth - coated

Colley.

j. The Bearded Colley.

4.	The English Sheepdog
or Drover’s Dog.

5.	The Esquimaux.

6.	The North American

Wolf Dog.

7.	Sleigh Dogs.

8.	The Truffle Dog.

This group does not include a great variety of British
dogs, especially as we have kept out of it the vermin
destroyers and others which have some claim to he
included in it. In head formation all are modifications
of the corresponding group in Division I., except the
English sheepdog, which is shorter and thicker in the
head. Most of the varieties embraced in it are marked
by a high degree of intelligence.

Chapter I.—THE SCOTCH COLLEY.

By Corsincon.

I do not think it p Dssible to Bay muoh—if, indeed, anythi ng—new abont
the oolley ; but as there has been almost as much nonsense written abont
this dog as on the subject of teetotalism, I shall try to shovel a lot of the
aconmnlated rubbish aside, that we may have a clearer view of the dog aB

o 2﻿ig6

British Dogs.

he waa and still is when “ unimproved ” by the descriptive eloquence of
the advertising and ignorant dealer, and “ undescribed ” by the ready
pen but too often superficially informed dog show reporter.

I do not say that these classes, even with the influence of the incom-
petent judge thrown in, have destroyed the colley, but they have done
their utmost, and succeeded so far that the dust they have kicked up has
got into the eyes of the public, and with the public, in consequence, a
usurper rules where the true colley should reign.

It is, perhaps, not my province to award the proportions of blame
among the three classes of delinquents referred to, but I decidedly think
the reporters are most deserving of oensure. The constant iteration
of what are evidently considered smart and clever sayings, regardless
of their relevancy or truth; the flippant delivery of the ipse dixit—
in fact, the constant chatter and gabble, as of spring geese, which
is often met with in the pages of fanciers’ papers, are sickening to a
degree, and as damaging as such twaddle can be to true canine interests.
They convince me th at the present system of dog show reporting is as
vicious as it is nauseous, and that there is no class, except, perhaps, the
judges, which the world could so well spare as the common run of dog
show reporters.

I need scarcely say I do not write indiscriminately of all judges and
all reporters. I have often seen the work of both, which proved con-
clusively that the performers not' only knew their business but took
pains to do it well. These, however, are still comparatively few, and are
the mere salt and pepper which prevent the general body from becoming
fly-blown.

Some years ago, when the “Field ” was the only paper reporting
dog shows, constant descriptions of colleys, with beautiful jet black
coats and rich orange tan markings were given ; and in advertisements
and elsewhere we still occasionally hear the reverberation of the silly
sing-song. What stronger incentive could there be to dealers to offer
half-bred Gordon setters as pure colleys, when the leading journal was
teaching the public such a false lesson, and thereby creating a demand
for the graceful mongrels with thin coats, “ soft as a lady’s hand,”
feathered legs, draggle-tails, saddle-flap ears, and a rich mahogany
coloured kissing spot on each cheek, that have been so plentiful ever
since. Nice articles these toys would be “ to bide the pelting of the﻿The Scotch Colley.

197

pitiless storm,” to bravely face the snow-drift and the sleet through
heather and moss hag, in tentie care of

the ourie cattle.

Or silly Bheep that hide the brattle
O’ winter war;

And through the drift deep lairing Bprattle,

Beneath a scaur.

I quote from memory, and therefore not literally, but I believe it was
“Idstone,” in one of the charming papers he used to contribute to the
“ Field,” who told the story of the Scotch shepherd on the hill side fall-
ing in love with his Gordon setters, and saying he would “ like a cross
o’ yin o’ them wi’ his colley, for they would throw unco braw whalps.”
Oh! “Idstone!” “Idstone!” how could you let my countryman draw
the white feather over your eyes so P The “ pawky auld carle ’ ’ had ulterior
designs on your whisky flask, and was not unmindful of the proverb,
“ Love me, love my dog ;” but a shepherd who would make such a pro-
position in earnest is not fit to take care of a hirsel.

Further, in reference to this question of colour, I, for my part, put-
aside, as purely fanciful and with facts all against them, the opinions
given in both the earlier and the last edition of “ Dogs of the British
Islands.” In the former I find it stated the colours are various, “some-
times sandy or of various mixed greys, some of which are singularly
beautiful and picturesque. There is generally a very fine white line
down the forehead, not amounting to a blaze as in the spaniel.”

Who wrote the article on colleys in the first edition I do not know,
but feel certain it was not “Stonehenge,” for he could not by any
possible slip conceivable to me be guilty of the absurdities with which it
abounds—to wit, the following quotations, the statements in whioh were
gravely made in a book for many years the standard work on dogs, given as
information to the British publio, and not as jokes, ponderous as they
would have been: “Their [the colleys] homing faculty is very extra-
ordinary, and it has been asserted that the Scottish drovers would send
them back alone from Smithfield to the Highlands with a wave of the
hand.” Would that the Ettrick Shepherd and Kit North had read the above
together—we Bhould have had an additional ohapter in the Nootes.
Again we have the following evidence of hearsay usurping the practical •.
“ If a dog is of a marked intelligence, he may even be trusted to lie upon﻿British Dogs.

198

an eminence all day and to watoh the movements of thousands of sheep
grazing below him, for he will keep all in their proper district; and when
he hears his master’s shrill whistle he will ‘ go round ’ and drive them
home.” I once read the foregoing balderdash to a Scotch shepherd,
which elicited the criticism, “Hoots ! fnlebody; does he think a’ the hirsel
lie in ae’ hollow, and that we drive them a’ hame at ’een like kye tae the
byre?” The fact is, the writer borrowed the story from an earlier writer,
“John Meyrick,” and enlarged and embellished it with the exuberance of
his own fancy as a bit of padding ; and that was the sort of intellectual
pabulum offered to the inquiring mind on colleys by the “ Dogs of the
British Islands.”

In the recently issued edition of his work, “ Stonehenge” has swept
his pages clean of all such trumpery, recognising that the extraordinary
intelligence really possessed by the colley needs not the embellishments
of Munchausenism, and he has given the best descriptive article on col-
leys ever written. Yet still on the subject of colour I have “a crow to
pluck ” with him, presumptuous as it may be to “ beard the lion in his den,”
as it were, and attack the king of canine writers in his very castle. He says:
“ A good deal of white is met with in some strains, and sometimes the
tan is altogether absent, but, cceteris paribus, a black and tan colour
without much white is highly preferred.” Now, this gives the impres-
sion that the black and tan has some superiority over those with white,
which is not the case ; neither, as stated by “ Stonehenge,” are black and
tan colleys the most commonly met with. That such is the case at shows I
freely grant, but there a large number owe the colour to the setter cross,
although in some cases this may be rather remote; but in the pastoral dis-
tricts of Scotland and the North of England my own observations, con-
firmed by reference to numerous friends, convince me that black-white-and-
tan colleys are the most numerous, and—chacon d son gotit; but cceteris
pasribus, I say those with a white ring, or almost a ring, round the neck,
a white chest, a white end to the tail, and a good broad dash of white down
the forehead and face are greatly to be preferred. That black and white
colleys have been long recognised, the following advertisement, which
appeared in the “ Edinburgh Evening Courant ” of 20th January, 1806,
bears witness: “ There was lost in Princess-street, on Saturday, the
28th Dec. last, a black and white rough colley or shepherd’s dog.”

I do not, however, rest my argument entirely either on my own observa-﻿The Scotch Colley.

199

tion nor npon the terms of an old advertisement. The plonghman-poet of
Scotland had plenty of opportunities, and may be allowed to have been
a capable observer, and of his own colley he says :

His breast was white, his toozie back
Weel clad wi* coat o’ glossy black.

Strong as I consider the evidence of Burns in my favour, I have still
my trump card to play, after which I hope the advocates of the black
and tan, and “ the fine line down the forehead not amounting to a
blaze,” will follow the advice of Joey Ladle to the musical party after
hearing Madeline sing.

No less an authority than Dr. Gordon Stables says “ the best dogs are
tricoloured, black on the body, with tan points, and white collar and chest
and forearms, and at times a blaze up the face and white tip to tail.”

I have no prejudice against black and tan, but much prefer the tricolour,
and I consider the white ring round the neck very characteristic of the
breed, and indeed it seems not improbable that this very usual distinctive
mark gave the name of colley to the breed, just as the sweetwilliam is
the ooll-me-quick of the garden from the ring of colour round its petals.

To pass on from the consideration of colour, 1 must say the colley’ 3
head has also been rather badly treated. So long as we had the black and
rich orange tan in the ascendant we were bound to have with it—with a
few exceptional cases—the high domed skull and more or less full fore-
head ; but having got rid of one evil, there are some judges and writers
olamorous to rush us into the opposite excess, and would have triangular
heads, with the foreheads planed down to a perfect level and tapering
jaws as long as those of a pike. These are some of the exaggerations
oreated and nursed by those who can only take in one point of a dog
at a time, and, having to say something, make that one point the all in
all of their ephemeral creed. As an instance of the way extremes are
run into, this desire for a long head as against the “ chumpy ” ones of
the Gordon setter cross sort, some of the prize winners at the Alexandra
Palace Show, July, 1879, had heads as long as deerhounds, and more
the shape of a Jargonelle pear than what a colley’s head should be.

Again, what an outcry there is if a colley is seen to carry his tail over
his baok when in the ring. What slaps with the chain and covert strokes
with the stick the kuowing ones give the poor caudal appendage, and all﻿200

British Dogs.

because ignorance puts its veto on the dog doing exactly what he ought
to do.

The colley is a dog of great spirit, and when he meets his peers, be it
at kirk, or market, or in the show ring, he gets his flag up, as muoh as to
say, “ I’m as good a dog as any of yon.” And for this, forsooth, the
“inverted telescope ” reviewers taboo the dog, and write him down as a
ring-tailed mongrel. No true colley carries his tail lying curled on his
back like a Pomeranian, but he should not trail it behind him like a
Llewellyn setter or the brush of a done-up fox.

There has been an attempt made by recent writers to circumsoribe the
national character of this dog by calling him the Highland colley, as though
he were peculiar to the north of Scotland. There appears to me to be
even less justification for this than for calling the old English blaok and
tan terrier the Manchester terrier, for Manchester has done something
special in making the modern black and tan terrier what he is ; but it is
not so in the case of the Highlands of Scotland and the colley, and this
dog is more properly described as the Scotch collie, even to the manner of
spelling the word.

This dog is peculiarly Scotch, and as a pastoral dog originally more
intimately connected with the lowlands, where he is still, I consider, met
with pure in the greatest numbers, although now plentiful both in the
highlands of Scotland and the northern counties of England, and, indeed,
through the influence of dog shows and the rage for the breed in fashion-
able circles in London itself, where he always appears to me to have
wandered out of his latitude.

The question of orthography may not be an important one, but I am
of opinion collie is correct, as I find Dr. Ogilvie, in his “ Imperial
Dictionary,” and Jameson, in his “Scottish Dictionary,” both give that
form of spelling, and I think it is not improbable that collie is merely
the diminutive and familiar form of coll, as in all Scotch words the “ ie ”
is thus used, as Will becomes Willie, and Lass Lassie. Bewick, in his
“British Quadrupeds,” indeed, had his own peculiar and original spelling
of the word, which was coaly—pardonable in a book published in coaly
Newcastle.

Of the moral and intellectual qualities of the dog a great deal of very
Billy rubbish has been written. His intelligence is of snch a high order
that it is not improved, but made ridiculous f>y the embellishments of those﻿The Scotch Colley.

201

who write without practical knowledge, and concoct foolish stories about
him, which are merely the reflex of their own love for the marvellous rather
than for the truth. It would, indeed, be difficult to over-estimate the intelli-
gence of a good colley; he thinks and acts for himself under difficulties
and conditions new to him, and in matters relative to his special duties
rarely fails to strike out the true path. That he feels the responsibility
of his charge and acts independently of special orders, all who have had
opportunities of observing him must have noted. Even the cottager’s
dog, when he has been once initiated into it as a duty, will turn the
poultry out of the garden without bidding. I have seen a dog in charge
under the shepherd of a flock of white-faced sheep on the south side of a
hill, and where the watershed was the boundary, and no fence to mark
it, over and over again, without the slightest hint from his master, get up
and leisurely pick out and drive back to the north side of the hill the
hardier black faces that had stolen over the crest and down the south
slope among their white-faced friends in search of the better bite they
well knew grew there. These are among the common duties and every,
day practice of trained colleys, which might be extended and illustrated
almost ad libitum, and are a sufficient proof of high intelligence without
intrenching on special doings of individual dogs, which in some instances
are certainly very remarkable ; but what higher display of that craftiness
and cunning with which the colley is credited can we have than in the
performances of trained specimens under the intelligent handling of the
shepherds at those sheepdog trials instituted by Mr. J. LI. Price, of
Bhiwlas, Bala P The craft and cunning is of a high order, and to me
clearly indicates considerable reasoning power ; and, indeed, the highest
encomium a Scotch shepherd can pass on a colley is that he is “ gey
wyse,” i.e., very wise.

Instances and anecdotes innumerable oould be given illustrative of the
colley’s cleverness and fidelity to his trust aud to his master, were this the
place for so doing, but I take it that my readers are fully aware of his
capability for marvellous displays of intelligence, and need neither
ancient saws nor modern instances to confirm them in their faith.

It is just worth notice that the colley is one among other sheepdogs
that writers have oredited with being the origin of all the varieties of our
domestic dogs ; but as each writer has selected the sheepdog of his own
country as the real original, the idea is considerably damaged, the Bheep-﻿202

British Dogs.

dogs of various countries differing quite as widely from each other as
the people do, so that I feel bound to accept the colley as he is, without
being too curious as to his origin—the theory that each country had a
special breed of dog manufactured for its special behoof, from which all
its varieties spring, not commending itself to my judgment.

There is one point I think most people will agree upon, namely, that
the colley is in physical properties more nearly allied to several races
of wild dogs than any other of our domestic breeds. The likeness
between the colley and the Indian hare dog, as given by Youatt, is very
striking.

In general appearance the colley stands clear and distinct from any
other of our domestic breeds—his build is light and graceful, no super-
abundance of needless bone or tissue to cumber him in his work, and no
sacrifice of these at the shrine of elegance ; yet his style and carriage are
eminently elegant in every outline and graceful movement, and there is
a fitness about him for the rough yet important work he has to do, and a
combination of wisdom and self-reliance, toned down by an expression of
loyalty and love for his master, that commends him to us and commands
our admiration.

The general contour, with its filling in, shows a combination of agility,
speed, suppleness, with a power of endurance that no other breed
possesses. There is no waste, no lumber about him ; even his heavy
coat is so in appearance only, being essentially wet-resisting and a ne-
cessity of his exposed existence.

There is no dog that excels the colley in good looks, high intelligence,
and unswervable loyalty to his master, and to these qualities does he owe
his high position as a general favourite with the public, whilst his many
practical excellencies render him indispensable to the shepherd.

As a general complete poetic yet accurate description of the colley, I
know of nothing to compare with Burns’ description of his own dog
Luath, which I therefore transcribe :

He was a gash and faithfn’ tyke
As ever lap a sheugh or dyke.

His honest, sonsie, bawsint face,

Aye gat him friends in ilka place.

His breast was white, his towzie back
Weel clad wi’ coat o’ glossy blaok.

His gawcie tail, wi’ upward cnrl,

Hang ower his hardies wi’ a swurl.﻿The Scotch Colley.

203

The wise and faithful, yet sonsie—that is, open, jolly, engaging look—
is admirably descriptive; and the bawsint face—that is, with the bold
white blaze down it, like a badger; and the gawcie, or large abundant
swirling tail, are eminently characteristic of the breed.

To take the points seriatim:

The head should be in size proportionate to the whole body, although
it looks rather small in the best specimens from the long thick ruff of
hair round the neck and throat in which it is set. The skull is broad
and rather flat, slightly narrowing towards the front. The forehead is
slight, and there is more or less fulness over the eyes, but this, if much
exaggerated, is a suspicious point. It should not, however, be a long
lean and gradually tapering head from occiput to nose, but the muzzle
gradually tapering and of fair length, without becoming what is termed
snipey. The teeth should be strong, white, and those of the upper and
lower jaw should meet. I have never seen a decidedly undershot colley.
Such a feature would be a great disfigurement, and the opposite, over-
shot or pig-jaw, is so also, although not to the same extent. This was a
great fault in Old Jack and in Carlyle, the subject of our illustration.

The eyes are pretty close together, being set well forward and at an
oblique angle, as, indeed, the eyes of all breeds are, more or less,
although in most not so pronounced as in the colley. The colour varies
with the colour of the coat, but generally some shade of brown. Those
with a good deal of white have generally the lightest eyes.

With the ear, the large drooping or “ saddle-flap ’ ’ style is almost a
certain indication of impurity, and if there is a silky fringe to it a setter
cross may be pretty safely inferred. I have seen colleys of undoubted
purity with prick ears, but they are not a nice feature. The ear that is
thrown back, with its tip embedded in the thick frill as the dog scampers
about or comes bounding towards you in his pleasure, and is seen imme-
diately to be at half cock, that is, pricked up when he is on the qwi vive
is the one to be desired. It drops when the dog is still.

In a rough-coated dog the shoulder must be felt to know what it is,
but it can be pretty well judged of by the dog’s action—a stiff stilted
movement betrays a straight and useless shoulder ; it should slope well,
and be well clothed with elastic muscle.

The chest is deep ; a wide one throws the elbows out, and indicates
too slow and laboured a pace. On the other hand, if the depth is﻿204

British Dogs.

exaggerated the dog will catch a bump on hags and tussocks as he
Tuns over rough ground.

The back is decidedly long and strong, but supple ; the fore ribs deep,
and not too much rounded; the back ribs rather shallow, but not so
much so as to cause the dog to be greatly tucked up in the flank. In
this there should be a happy medium between the greyhound form and
the square built mastiff. The loin is slightly arohed, and from the hip
bones there is a gradual droop to the set on of tail.

The forelegs straight and muscular, strong forearm, elbow in a line
with the body and well let down; hind legs well bent, strong and
muscular thighs; sickle hocks; from the hock-joint there should be
no feathering, in strong contrast to the hams above, where the
feathering is very abundant; the feet are not quite round, like a cat’s,
neither are they long, like an English terrier’s, but between the two ;
the knuckles are well sprung, the claws strong, and the pads hard and
useful.

The coat is of the greatest importance, and one of the great
characteristics of the breed. It consists of an outer long compara-
tively thin lot of hair, of hard, useful texture, and an under jacket of
very thick, close, soft hair, quite of a woolly texture, and in black dogs
always of a fulvous colour, which is frequently seen through the outer
thin covering. The two combined are impermeable to rain, and even to
Scotch mist of any ordinary or reasonable sort, and this, for a dog that
has to be constantly running through long grass, brackens, rushes,
and heather, or lying cnrled up in a snow wreath, or by a wet dyke side,
is of the utmost importance. In winter, with alternate snow, rain, and
frost, a very long coat is objectionable, as it gets matted with mud and
balls of snow, and makes travelling almost impossible for him. On the
jaws, face, skull, and on the entire front and inside of legs, the hair is
short and smooth, but from the angle of the jaw and round immediately
at the back of the occiput it is very long, and round the throat turns
upwards and forwards So thick and long is it round the neck and throat
as to form a decided frill or ruff, and this I hear called “ the mane ” and
“ the apron/’ both terms inappropriate and as purely fanciful as ridiculous.
If our modern dog fanciers must turn word coiners, they shonld become
more expert at it before thrusting their manufacture on the public. On
the whole of the body the coat stands well out, because of the abundance﻿The Scotch Colley.

205

of undercoat, although, the whole presents a level and flat appearance at
a little distance. The hair on the hams and tail is very abundant, quite
a contrast to the fine thin fringe that adorns these parts of the setter.

I believe black and white, with more or less of tan, to be the pre-
dominating colour, and not black and tan, as has been so often
insisted on in recent years. All black, black and tan, black and white
without tan, red and white, red tawny grizzled, and beautiful blue-grey
and white mottle or mirled, I have seen, and it must always be a matter
of taste which is preferred. I like the tricoloured best, and do not object
to a good dash of white. If there is much white it is sure to appear on
the collar, the feet, and lower legs and the tip of the tail.

The tail should not be set on too high; it should be of fair length,
not quite equal to the dog’s height at shoulder, and be ornamented
with abundance of feathering, thick, and of good length. When the dog
stands quiet, it “ hangs ower his hindies wi’ a swirlwhen galloping it
is carried nearly straight out; and when he greets his fellows and takes
the measure of a stranger his flag is up, his oolours are displayed, for no
reoreant coward is he, but as fond of a free fight as an Irishman. Has
he not made the expressive word “ Collieshangie,” my masters P Although
carried well up and curved, not stuck up like a mop handle, it is never
ourled over the back & la Pomeranian.

Among the best rongh-coated colleys I have seen shown are, Mr.
Skinner’s Vero, Mr. W. W. Thomson’s Moss, Mr. S. E. Shirley’s
Tricolour, Mr. Ashwin’s Cocksie, Mr. Cope’s Time, Mr. Wildman’s
Marcus, Lad o’ Kyle, and old Hero, whose present owner I do not know.
There are, of conrse, many others well worth mention, for the classes
are rapidly rising in quality at our best shows. In bitches I have seen
nothing I liked so well as Hornpipe and Bess.

The following are measurements of celebrated Colleys :

Mr. W. A. Walker’s (Warwick) Scott (5424) : Age, 3 years and 10
months ; height at shoulder, 24in.; length of nose to set on of tail,
42in.; length of tail, 20in.; girth of chest, 28in.; girth of loin, 22£in.;
girth of head, 17£in.; girth of forearm, 7£in. ; length of head from
occiput to tip of nose, llin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, din.

Mr. W. A. Walker’s (Warwick) Colley bitch: Age, 2 years 1 month ;
height at shoulder, 21£in.; length of nose to set on of tail, 37in.; length﻿206

British Dogs.

of tail, 19in.; girth, of chest, 26in.; girth of loin, 20in.; girth of head,
15in.; girth of forearm, 7£in.; length of head from ocoipnt to tip of
nose, lOJin. ; girth of muzzle, midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8in.

Mr. Ashwin’s Cocksie: Age, 3 years; weight, 491b.; height at
shoulder, 21£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 37in. ; length of
tail, 17in.; girth of chest, 26in.; girth of loin, 21in. ; girth of head,
13in.; girth of forearm, 6in.; girth of head from occiput to tip of nose,
9ain.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7|in.

Mr. R. I. H. Price’s Gather : Age, 10 years ; weight, 541b.; height at
shoulder, 22|in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 42in. ; length of
tail, 14in.; girth of chest, 27in.; girth of loin, 20in. ; girth of head,
15in.; girth of forearm, 7 a in.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 10£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8in.

Dr. James’s Carlyle : Age, 5 years ; weight, 571b.; height at shoulder,
21in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 36in. ; length of tail, 18in.;
girth of chest, 30in.; girth of loin, 24in.; girth of head, 15£in.; girth
of forearm, 7in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, llin.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8in.

Chapter II.—THE SMOOTH-COATED COLLEY.

By Corsincon.

In all points, except coat, this variety is a facsimile of the more
fashionable rough-coated ones, indeed, rough-coated and smooth-coated
are often found in the same litter, a good instance of which is Mr. W. W.
Thomson’s Guelt, who is of the most noted strain in the West of
Scotland, being a lineal descendant of the dog of a noted sheep stealer,
who, as he drove his flock to the southern markets along the old Roman
road that runs along the crest of the hills on the north bank of the river
Nith, used to send his dog along the hill sides or the south side of the
river to select a few sheep from several flocks, and, fording the river add
them to his master’s drove.﻿MR. W. W. THOMSON’S SMOOTH-COATED COLLEY BITCH “ YARROW" (K.C.S.B.﻿﻿The Smooth-coated Colley.

207

Mr. Thomson had his dog Guelt and another from the same litter direct
from their breeder, Mr. Craig, of Glen, and one of them was a very rough-
coated one.

Some shepherds prefer these to the long-coated, as they do not get
matted with snow, and their coat is so dense as to prove a sufficient
protection against the weather.

The mottled, marbled, mirled, or Harlequin variety are nearly always
smooth-coated and also “ china-eyed;” Mr. Howard Mapplebeck’s well-
known bitch Fan is an exception in the last particular, but I look upon it
as a defect in her, so characteristic of the breed is the china eye—
indeed, in many specimens both eyes are of this kind.

Of late we have had very good classes of smooth-coated colleys shown,
they being especially numerous in the north of England. The best
before the public is, I consider, Mr. W. W. Thomson’s Yarrow (facile
princeps). She is small, but judged by points can give all her opponents
ten points and beat them easily. As I bought the bitch in Scotland, and
after winning with her sold her to Mr. Thomson, it may be thought I am
slightly prejudiced in her favour ; but it is not so; on deliberate
judgment and careful comparison, I think her the best ever shown.
Next to her I would place Mr. Swinburne’s Lassie. Both of these bitches
are black, white, and tan.

Mr. Thomson has also excellent dogs in Guelt and Hawk, and a mirled
dog with two china eyes, bred on Salisbury Plain. Mr. Wilson’s Meg,
Mr. W. H. Charles’s Scott, and Mr. M. C. Ashwin’s Nellie are also in
the front rank. There is a scarcity of good smooth-coated sires.

I have omitted to notice that the Harlequin or mottled dog is often
termed the Welch “ heeler.” The variety is, I believe, rather popular in
Wales, but it is by no means confined to the Principality, but found
scattered all over the United Kingdom.

In judging smooth colleys ten points only need be allowed for coat, the
ten points deducted being given for symmetry and general appearance.﻿208

British Dogs.

Chapter III.—THE BEARDED COLLEY.

By Corsincon.

In the west of Scotland there is a rough-faced and very shaggy-coated
dog called the bearded colley, differing mainly from the true colley in
being rough-faced, rather heavier built, altogether less elegant, and with
a shaggier and harsher coat.

I think they must be a cross with a rough hound, otter hound, or deer-
hound—probably the former.

------------

Chapter IV.—THE ENGLISH BOB-TAILED
SHEEPDOG, OR DROVER’S DOG.

By Corsincon.

This appears to be quite a distinct variety of pronounced type, but
confusion appears to have arisen in the minds of more than one writer by
taking every drover’s dog with a docked tail to belong to the genuine
stock. At one time dogs without tails were not taxed, which was a
sufficient inducement to owners to cut ofE that useful and ornamental
appendage to their dogs.

It has been held that this docking of the tail generation after
generation resulted in pups being bom tailless; but although such a
result might follow if the practice were continued long enough, I do not
think such was the case, and that being the cause is controverted by the
fact that the bob-tailed sheepdog has other clearly marked features in
common which breeding from the promiscuous herd of dogs docked to
save a tax would have dissipated rather than insured.

“ Stonehenge” suggests that a cross with the bulldog may account for
the short bob tail, and considers this idea strengthened because he
asserts these dogs frequently show a tendency to the brindle colour.
I think “ Stonehenge” is wrong in this. A brindle dog of this variety﻿The Bob-tailed Sheepdog.

209

must, I think, be rare; at least, the vast majority of those I have met
with are black and white, grey or grizzled; and in attending shows for so
many years a large number have come under my notice.

In appearance they differ very widely from the elegant colley—square
built, short backed, bull necked, and with a rounder head and truncated
muzzle. The coat is long and shaggy, more or less curly in some
instances, but much better when straight. The face, unlike the colley,
is always more or less rough—that is, bearded.

This breed I have seen in greatest numbers in the West of England,
and at the Devon shows there have been exhibited the best I have met
with.

Occasionally specimens with long tails are met with, of which Mr.
F. W. Parry’s Help is wonderfully good. “Stonehenge” also makes
the, to me, singular statement respecting this breed that “he has the
peculiar habit of running over the backs of sheep when in flock in
order to head them, and on that account is highly valued in fairs and
markets.”

This habit is not at all peculiar to the bob-tails. Any colley that is
up to its business will do so when ocoasion requires it, as everyone must
have observed who has attended a sheep fair or market, and this, among
other reasons, is why a light nimble dog is to be preferred to a heavy
one, which it may be as well to notice, for there are evidences of a
tendency in some of our judges to go in for large dogs. The object
Bhould be to encourage dogs of the size best suited for the performance
of their natural work, and although a large dog may have a grander and
more imposing appearance, and for that reason be preferred as an orna-
mental companion, excessive size is a disadvantage, and by judges should
be viewed as Buch.﻿210

British Dogs.

Chapter V.—THE ESQUIMAUX DOG.

By Corsincon.

The Esquimaux dog occupies as wide a geographical range, and includes
as much variety, as the human species to whom the term is applied, but
also presents throughout its variations certain general and prominent
family features.

These are a certain gaunt and wolf-like form and fierceness of
expression, the muzzle pointed, ears erect, and eyes more or less oblique,
small, and piercing, and the coat dense and deep, the latter to enable
them to withstand the intense cold of the northern regions of which they
are native.

We have specimens of them occasionally exhibited whioh we may
assume to have been selected as superior to the general run.

We have seen no handsomer than the dog Garry, of which we give an
engraving. He has been repeatedly shown in this country, and at the
Alexandra Palace exhibition, December, 1878, was described in the
catalogue as “ an Esquimaux bred in the extreme north of Lombardy.’'

Mr. C. E. Fryer, whose notice of Garry we reproduce from The Country,
entitled him a “North American wolf dog,” and we find the idea that
these dogs, or at least special varieties of them, are produced by a cross
with the wolf rather commonly entertained, but there is no better reason
for it than his general wolfish appearance. Garry is decidedly typical of
the Esquimaux family of dogs, and on the subject of his breeding we have
little to add to our sub-note to Mr. Fryer’s letter at the time it first
appeared.

Mr. Fryer says : “ The accompanying engraving represents one of these
curious dogs, which are so much prized by the natives and inhabitants
of North America, and bo difficult to obtain in thiB country. The
cut is taken from a photograph of a dog lately owned by a member
of Oxford University, who gave me the following account of it:
Garry, the dog in question, is about eighteen months old, and has
been in this country seven months. He was brought from the
Saskatchewan Mountains, Manitoba, in the far north-west of Canada.
The following are the dimensions of this handsome dog: Height﻿﻿MR. J. ANGELL’S NORTH AMERICAN WOLF DOG “GARRY” (K.C.S.B. 8798).﻿The Esquimaux Dog.

211

at shoulder, 2ft. 6in.; length from centre between shoulder blades
to centre between ears, 1ft.; from latter point to end of nose, llin.;
length from shoulders to setting on of tail, 2ft. 7in.; length of tail,
lft. 4in.; measurement round head just behind ears, 2ft.; just above
eyes, lft. 8in.; at point of nose, lOin. ; his girth measured fairly tight,
not outside the hair, 3ft. ; his weight is 8st. 81b. His hair is long,
straight, and pure white, which is his chief beauty. The Indians take
great pride in rearing a pure white wolf dog, and when they manage to
seoure one they have a feast in his honour, called the ‘ Feast of the
White Dog.’ I refrain from attempting the native names, lest I should
display my own ignorance and do some damage to my readers’ jaws.
Garry is said to be the produoe of an Esquimaux bitch, crossed nine
times by a prairie wolf. The Indians chain up the Esquimaux mothers
in the neighbourhood of the wolves, to whose kind attentions they leave
them. The dog Garry has travelled many thousand miles over the snow,
drawing a sleigh, and is quite tame, following his master closely through
the streets without chain or muzzle. Sometimes he is treated to this latter
Bign of ‘ civilisation,’ under which he is very patient, though he
continually endeavours to free himself from it. His food is plain dog
biscuit, which he eats without complaint, though at first he ate raw meat
ravenously. His master, however, finding his blood was getting too hot,
gradually reduced him to one meal per day of dog biscuits. He is very
tractable and docile, and but for his enormous size would not give any idea
of ferocity. His eyes are very small, and of a pale yellow colour.

“ The long thiok tail, the pointed head, and short pointed ears seem
unmistakably to show the wolf blood in the dog, and his general appear-
ance shows his descent. His mouth would easily take in a man’s leg,
and his teeth are a caution to dentists. Whether he feels flattered
by being told that we are possessors of developed ‘ canine ’ teeth I can’t
say.

“ His owner tells me he does not bark, but utters a low growl when
enraged, and at night howls piteously.

“The dog was entered for exhibition at the last Birmingham dog
show, 1876, where he was awarded a special prize.’’

The mystic story |of Garry’s birth and parentage is very charming, but
I fear the talismanio number nine would alone be fatal to it, as it is
deoidedly suspicious ; and in these days of Kennel Stud Books we

P 2﻿212

British Dogs.

get awfully sceptical of unauthenticated pedigrees, and in such matters
positively refuse as evidence the traditions of the Red Man, however
pretty and romantic. I saw Garry in the flesh at Birmingham—where,
by the way, he took a £5 prize—and I must pronounce him the very
finest specimen of an Esquimaux dog I have seen, »but I must differ
from our esteemed correspondent when he says there is unmistakeable
evidence of wolf blood in the dog. Dogs appear to approach nearer to
the wolf type the farther they are removed from the higher civilised life of
man, and that, I think, is the case with Garry, and, besides that, hybrids
do not breed. The measurements cannot have been accurately taken ;
and Mr. Fryer must have been misinformed as to Garry’s sleigh drawing,
if we may judge by his age.

Among those exhibited in this country, the best specimens I have seen
are Zouave, shown by Mr. W. Arkwright, and Mr. W. K. Taunton’3
Sir John Franklin and Zoe.

Zouave I have understood was imported from Greenland, and Sir John
Franklin, the finest exhibited, was brought over in the Pandora. As
they are now being bred by one or two gentlemen in this oountry we
may, in a few years, see more of them.

Mr. Taunton describes his Esquimaux as intelligent and of amiable
disposition, and the following is his description of them :

“ The head is wolf-like, with the same pointed muzzle, and, more
or less, the oblique eye, which gives the dog a treacherous appear-
ance ; ears small, rounded, erect, and pointed forward; short thick
neck, deep chest, body long; legs well made, without any feather, feet
round, tail very bushy and carried curled over the back. The coat is
dense and thick, standing out from the body, and is stiff on the outside
like bristles, especially so along the back, whilst the undercoat is a soft
wool, much resembling down, and admirably adapted to keep out the cold
and wet. The nearer approach in appearance to the wolf the more
typical of the breed I should consider it. The colour varies, being some-
times pure white, sometimes, as in Towser and Sir John Franklin, a
silvery grey, and other colours. In size they vary, those which are
reared where fish is plentiful making, I am informed, larger dogs than
those bred further away where food is scarcer. The average height, as
far as I am able to ascertain, would be 22in. to 24in.’’

Dogs of this class are of the greatest service drawing sleighs, and, as﻿The Esquimaux Dog.

213

descriptive of several varieties so used, we quote the following description
from a letter ou the subject, and accompanied with sketches of the heads
of several taken from life by a correspondent, Mr. Adrian Neison, of
Manitoba.

The heads of the two named the Togan&e and the Timber wolf dog,

THE TIMBEE WOLF DOG.

the latter especially, greatly resemble that of Garry. The Hoosqu& is in
the drawing shown with a prominent skull, whioh the position and the
amount of upstanding hair on it aooounts for.

Mr. Neison’s remarks cannot fail to be of interest to those who take
delight in the varieties our great shows now bring together, and among
whioh are so often found specimens of Esquimaux type.﻿214

British Dogs.

The first that Mr. Neison, who was writing of sleigh dogs, noticed was a
oross with the Newfoundland; of those of decidedly Esquimaux character;
he says, “ The next is the most common breed of sleigh dog, and isbetter
known as the plain ‘Husky’ dog, of which there are two distinct
varieties. It is quite evident that they are of the same Btook, if not
descendants of tamed specimens of the large timber or Arotio wolf, and

THE TOGANEE DOG

of prairie wolf or Toganfce. The other dog is the Hoosqud of the
Mackenzie river district, and is the dog used by the American Esquimaux,
and of these there is a yellow and a black variety.

“ Of course these breeds are found more or less mixed all over the
continent, especially varieties of the wolf breed, as these are by far
the most numerous.﻿The Esquimaux Dog.

215

“ I have observed them crossed until almost lost in the Newfoundland,
and I am told on the best authority it is the same in Labrador.

“The dog is only found pure to my knowledge in Abbitibbe, and on
the Peaoe river.

“ The Toganfee and Arotic wolf dog are both muoh the same in general
appearanoe. Their colour is stone grey, the build large and bony, with

THE BLACK HOOSQUE DOG.

very large feet; they have sharp noses and prick ears. When orossed
with others they always have a blotohed appearance from the peculiar
dark markings which they then take. The hair is long and wiry, and falls
against the body. The Arotio is a very large dog indeed, his usual size
being fully equal to the largest dogs I have seen in England; the
Togan&e is never larger than a spaniel, and iB often smaller. This is
the common so-called ‘ Husky ’ dog of Manitoba. North of the﻿216

British Dogs.

Saskatchewan and east of Lake Winnipeg it dissappears, and the Arctic
takes its place—a peculiarity common to the two breeds of wolf, the
prairie wolf being mi known in these regions. The true “ Husky ” dogs
are, I believe, peculiar to the American Esquimaux. The dog of the
Greenland Esquimaux, as obtained at Disco, being, I believe, a distinot
breed. These I consider the best sleigh dogs known, especially the black
variety of Hoosque. They are also found in all shades of yellow, sometimes
almost white. Out of a good many hundred I have not seen a single
specimen marked with either white or brown patches. When skinned it
is at once noticed that the skull is unusually flat; this peculiarity is
hidden in the live animal by its hair. It has a heavy jaw, very small
round ears, which are always erect, and the hair, which is long, hard,
and wiry, invariably stands erect off the skin, very similar to that of a
black bear, to which the whole dog bears a very close resemblance when
lying down. All of this breed are fierce, treacherous, and active. A
man would be considered a fool who attempted to harness them without
his whip, and that whip must have some little bells, thimbles, or pieces of tin
attached, so as to constantly jingle. Approaching the dog, the driver
throws the lash, which is about 10ft. long, round the dog’s neck, twists
it until it almost chokes him, and then drags him to his collar by main
strength, grasps his head between his thighs, and then slips the collar,
which is very tight, over the head. From that instant the dog is quiet
and submissive enough. The whips used are of plaited caribou hide,
with from 2oz. to 8oz. of small shot woven into them to give them weight.
Besides this, with most trains, it is necessary to carry chains to fasten
the dogs at night, and, if travelling on ice, also a spear to picket them
to. Mr. Ouyon, of Fort Chippewyan, on Lake Athabasea, has some
splendid dogs of this breed. This post has the reputation of having the
finest dogs in the North.

“ A peculiarity in these dogs is that they all have bright, clear, yellow
eyes, similar to a cat, with great powers of dilating the pupils.”

The illustrations are facsimiles of some rough sketches whioh accom-
panied Mr. Neison’s letter.

Although we have had dogs exhibited under the distinctive names of
the North American wolf dog and sleigh dogs, I have not seen any to
warrant a, separate description, and have, therefore dealt with them as
Esquimaux dogs, of which they are varieties.﻿The Truffle Dog.

217

Chapter VI.—THE TRUFFLE DOG.

By Corsincon.

Considering the utility of this little dog, and that he is so inbred and
distinct from other varieties, it is a wonder we never see specimens in the
variety classes at onr shows, for although truffle hunters do not belong to
the exhibiting class, those who do take an interest in shows might have
been expected to show the public what this clever and really useful dog is
like in the flesh.

They appear to be a dog with a considerable amount of poodle blood in
them, with a dash of terrier of some kind. Their work is to find where
the truffles lie buried, which demands a keen nose, much perseverance, and
considerable intelligence. They are trained to this work, being carefully
broken from game, and by their cleverness form the main support of
many families.

They average about 141b. or 151b. in weight, and are more agile looking
than the pure poodle.

The colour is generally white, black and white, or a grey.

As they do not come under the category of exhibition dogs no scale of
points has been drawn up of the breed, their owners being only anxious
to develop in them those qualities by which they assist them in their
labour without paying regard to external appearance.﻿GROUP II.

Watchers and Defenders of Life and Property,
Companion and Ornamental Dogs,

Including:

1.	The Bulldog.

2.	The Mastiff.

j. The St. Bernard.

4.	The Newfoundland.

5.	The Dalmatian.

6. The Thibet Mastiff.

>j. The Great Dane.

8. The German Mastiff, or
Boarhound.

The head formation in all the varieties I have placed
in this group agrees more or less closely with Cuvier’s
description of his third division, namely, muzzle more
or less shortened, skull high, frontal sinus enlarged,
condyle of the lower jaw extending above the level of
the upper cheek teeth, and the cranium diminished in
capacity.

Chapter VII.—THE BULLDOG.

By F. G. W. Cbafeb.

Of the many distinct varieties of the domesticated dog, the bulldog,
although one of the oldest and pnrest, is the most neglected and mis-
represented. From being very nnmeronB and popnlar, it has become
so scarce that other dogs number hundreds, even thousands, to every
bulldog. It is rarely seen except at dog shows, where it is looked upon﻿﻿﻿The Bulldog.

219

only sb a relio of a barbarous and bygone age. Most writers agree that
the bulldog existed in this country before any record, and that it is
indigenous to this, and has never been found in any other country. The
unfounded supposition “ that he has been produoed by a mixture of the
blood of the hysena with that of the common dog ” is not probable or
generally admitted.

On the origin of the bulldog there has been some dispute between the
admirers of that breed and those of the mastiff, each being asserted to be
the stock whence the other is derived. All 1 can gather on the subject
points to the conclusion that the ancestor of both breeds was the dog
oalled the “alaunt," “ mastive or bandog,” the description of which is
more applicable to the modem bulldog than to the modem mastiff. Mr.
Jesse says “ Cotgrave gives the following, which is evidently copied from
the ‘ Master of the Game ’: Allan, a kind of dog, big, strong, thickheaded,
and short snouted. Allan de boucherie is like our mastive, and serves
butohers to bring in fierce oxen and keep their stalls. Allan gentil is
like a greyhound in all properties and parts, his thick and Bhort head
exoepted. Allan vautre, a great and ugly cur, of that kind (having a big
head, hanging lips, and slouching ears) kept only to bait the bear and
wild boar.’ Du Fouilloux gives, in his ‘ Interpretations de Venerie ’ :
* Allans qui sont oomme Leuriers fors qu’il ont grosBe teste et courte.’ ”

The “ Master of the Game,” after reviewing the kinds of alaunt above
mentioned, says : “Ye heued ye whiche should be greet and short; and
thouze ther Alauntes of alle heues ye vray hue of ye good Alauntz yat is
most common Bhuld be white, with a blak spot a houb ye eerys; small
eyne and white stondying eres. . . . Any beest yat he might come to he
Bhuld hold with his seseurs, and nought leave it, for an alaunt of his
nature holdeth faster his biting yan Bhuld three greehoundes. ... A
good Alaunt should be hardy to nyme al maner beestis without turning
and hold fast and not leave it.” The “ mastives ” are by the same author
described separately as watoh dogs.

Dr. Kaye (or Caius, a.d. 1576) describes the “ mastive or bandogge ”
ob watoh dogs, “ serviceable against the foxe and the badger, to drive
wilde and tame swyne out of medowes, pastures, glebe lands, and places
planted with fruite, to bayte and take the bull by the eare when oocasion
so requireth . . . for it is a kind of dogge capable of courage, violent,
and valiant, . . . standing in feare of no man, in so muoh that no﻿220

British Dogs.

weapons will make him shrincke nor abridge his boldness .	. .No

dogge can serve the sundry uses of men so aptly or so conveniently as
this sort.”

Prom the descriptions it is evident that the original ‘ ‘ alaunt,” “ mastive
or bandog,” was a dog distinguished by a large, short, and thick head and a
short muzzle, and his chief qualities were his high courage and his ability
to “ pin and hold. ” These characteristics have always been, and still
are, peculiar to the bulldog, “as true a dog as ever fought at head.”
“ The broad-mouthed dogs of Britain ” could only refer to a breed having
the broad mouth possessed by the bulldog, and by no other dog. In the
middle ages dogs that were used for the same general purposes, although
of various kinds, were most probably called by the same name, alaunt (of
which there were several sorts, as described above), meaning any house
or watch dog, in contradistinction to hounds. The dog that was used,
as Dr. Caius says, “against the foxe and the badger,” &c., would be the
same used in baiting animals, and as “sport” increased it must soon
have become apparent that a certain size and make of dog was best
adapted for a certain purpose. Spenser wrote, a.d. 1553-98 :

Like as a mastiff, having at a bay
A salvage bull, whose cruell homes do threat
Desperate daunger if he them assaye.

Baiting the bear and the bull was undoubtedly a very ancient pastime,
and was patronised by persons of both sexes of the highest rank, as
recorded in cases where King Henry. II., Queen Mary, Princess Elizabeth,
&c., were interested spectators.

The bull being very different in its mode of combat to other animals,
caused bull-baiting to become a distinct sport, for which a distinot class
of dog was exclusively kept. One author says, “ The bulldog exhibits
that adaptation to the uses to which he is rendered subservient which we
see in every race of dogs; and we have only to suppose the peculiar
characters of the animal, called forth from generation to generation by
selection, to be assured that a true breed would be formed. This haB
been so in a remarkable degree in the case of the bulldog. After the
wild oxen of the woods were destroyed, the practice was introduced so
early as the reign of King John of baiting the domesticated bull and other
animals, and thus the breed of dogs suited to this end was preserved,
nay cultivated, with increased care up to our own times, ’ ’ centuries after﻿The Bulldog.

221

his larger and coarser brother “ Allan Yantre, kept only to bait the bear
and wild boar,” had become extinct on account of the cessation of its
employment. The introduction of the sport referred to is thus given in
the “Survey of Stamford”: “William, Earl Warren, lord of this
town in the time of King John (a.d. 1199 to 1216), standing upon the
castle walls of Stamford, saw two bulls fighting for a cow in the meadow
till all the butchers’ dogs, great and small, pursued one of the bulls
(being maddened with noise and multitude) clean through the town. This
sight so pleased the said earl that he gave all those meadows (called the
Castle Meadows) where first the bull duel begau for a common to the
butchers of the town, after the first grass was eaten, on condition they
find a mad bull the day six weeks before Christmas Day for the con-
tinuance of that sport every year.”

A yet ignobler band is guarded round

With dogs of war—the bull their prize ;

And now he bellows, humbled to the ground,

And now they sprawl in howlings to the skies.

******

Now bull! now dogge 1 ’loo, Paris, loo!

The bull has the game: 'ware horns, ho !

In bull-baiting the object the dog was reqnixed to effect was that termed
“ pinning and holding,” which was to seize the bnll by the muzzle “ and
not leave it; ” the bull’s nose being his most tender part, he was, when
seized by it, rendered helpless. The bull in fighting naturally lowers his
head to use his horns, and was often provided with a hole in which to bury
hiBnose—some old veterans (“game” bulls), not so indulged, would scrape
one for themselves; it was therefore necessary for the dog to keep his
own head close to the ground, or, as it was termed, to “ play low ; ” the
larger dogs were obliged to crawl on their bellies to avoid being above the
bull’s horns, hence the smallest dog of the kind capable of accomplishing
the object required was selected, it being useless to sacrifice large dogs
when smaller and more active, though equally courageous dogs, answered
the purpose better. The dog found to be the best suited to the require-
ments, and actually used by our ancestors until the cessation of bull
baiting, was from 14in. to 18in. high, weighing 401b. or 501b., very broad
musoular, and compact, as shown in pictures still extant, notably an
engraving dated 1734, from a picture by Moreland, of three bull-dogs of
exaotly the same type as that of the purest bred dogs of the present day﻿222

British Dogs.

—Crib and Rosa (1817), Luoy (1834)—“Mr. Howard and his Pets,”
“ The Bull Loose,” and others.

On the suppression of bull-baiting by Act of Parliament in the early
part of the present century the bulldog lost its peculiar occupation, but
was preserved from extinction in the families of some of its admirers and
bred in all its purity.

After some considerable time the breed became fashionable for awhile
as a companion. Subsequently an attempt was made to breed it as small
as possible, for a toy, by crossing it with the terrier, but this attempt only
resulted in a travestie of the true breed, and eventually failed on account
of the tendency to revert to the original size.

Of late years strenuous attempts in the opposite direction have been
made by a few breeders to increase the bulldog’s size, by breeding it with
the mastiff and large foreign dogs, and also to have the gigantic mongrel
race received as a new standard for the old breed, with which it differs
in the most important points (the broad mouth and receding nose
especially). The result is the obliteration of the characteristic type.

In spite of all the breed has suffered from the neglect and disparage-
ment of its opponents, and the injury it has sustained from its more
mischievous and inventive patrons, there still remain true representatives
of the original bulldog for the use of those breeders who wish to preserve
the correct type of the pure, old-fashioned dog, and who are wise enough
to decline to be misled by false pedigrees and specious arguments into
breeding from novel-shaped parents under pretence of improving the
breed and restoring it to what it is alleged to have been before bull-
baiting became a separate sport. There are men still living who remem-
ber bull-baiting being practised ; some of such have frequently described
it to me, and their descriptions of the sport agree entirely with the one
quoted by Jesse, dated 1694. The baited bull, like the coursed hare,
was supposed to be better for eating than when killed in cold blood.
The bull was fastened by a rope or chain, about four or five yards long,
to a ring round a stake, and the dogs were slipped at him (generally)
singly. “ The dog that runs fairest and furthest in wins.” The owner
of the bull charged a certain sum for each dog slipped, and both he and
the owners of the dogs made collections amongst the spectators. My
informants agree that the dogs used were of the same type and size as
the best medium-sized dogs of the present day, but one says that Borne﻿The Bulldog.

223

dogs were, in the last days of the sport, bred impure, the favourite cross
being with a oolley (bearing to the pure breed the same relation that the
lnroher or poacher’s dog bears to the pure greyhound), and always “ran
cunning.’’ It is also stated that a dog of about 401b. was sometimes able
not merely to pin a bull, but to throw it on its side. Another informant,
on whose word I can rely, related to me the following occurence, which
he witnessed: Some cattle were being driven through a butcher’s shop in
London, when one broke away from the rest, and could not be driven
through the door. The butcher called his bulldog, described as of the
old-fashioned type, about 451b., whioh had been quietly watching the
proceedings from the side of the shop, and the dog rushed immediately
and seized the beast by the nose, and dragged it forcibly through the
shop into the yard at the back.

The distinguishing characteristics of the bulldog are (as given in the
ancient descriptions of the alaunt) a short nose, a large and massive head,
and a “ broad mouth”—the latter the most essential of all other points
and a sine qud non. The larger the head in circumference (caused by
the prominent cheeks), the greater the quantity of muscle to hold the
jaws together; the shorter the snout and jaws, the more powerful the
grasp (as in a vice or pair of pincers); the broader and flatter the mouth
in front, laterally, the larger and broader the grip taken. The under jaw
projects beyond the upper, to enable the dog when running directly to the
front to grasp the bull, and, when fixed, to give him a firmer hold ; the
lower jaw, being very thiok and strong, makes the mouth appear curved
upwards across the middle of the. face. The top of the nose inolines
backwards, so as to allow free passage of the air into the nostrils whilst
the dog was “ holding.” It is apparent that, if the mouth does not pro-
ject beyond the nose, but that if the jaws and nose were even (“ level ”),
the nostrils would be flat against the part to which the dog was fixed, and
breathing would then be stopped. The dog is roally then not a bulldog to
all intents and purposes. Bulldogs, especially the large and new types,
are frequently seen with this defective formation, which is termed “frog-
faced ” and “ down-faced,” and this formation Bhould deprive the dog of
all olaim to compete as a pure bred bulldog, and disqualify it entirely for
show purposes. The body of the dog is (like that of man) broad and deep
in the shoulders and chest, and small in the waist, the forelegs appearing
short on aooount of the deep chest and musoular shoulders. The back﻿224

British Dogs.

short and strong—long backed animals being weak, slow, and unwieldy,
easily fatigued, and having a loose, shuffling, and disjointed manner of
moving. The hind legs large and muscular, with plenty of propelling
power, and like the greyhound’s, long in proportion to his forelegs,
raising the loins into an arch higher than the shoulders, so as to bring his
hind legs well under him, and enable him to spring quickly high off the
ground. The belly small and well gathered up; and the flank, under the
loins, hollow, to lighten him as much as possible of useless weight. The
wrinkles on the head, the length of the tail, the colour, and other minor
points much insisted on by modern fanciers, however much to be admired,
were, and ought still to be, of secondary importance to (instead of taking
precedence of) a correct general formation, and especially of the square
protruding lower jaw, the broad mouth, and receding nose.

In size the best show specimens are found to be—dogs 351b. to 551b.,
bitches 301b. to 501b. I am not singular in the opinion that at shows
bulldogs should not be classed according to weight, but only according to
sex, so that all would compete fairly on their individual merits, instead
of, as at present, a very inferior specimen with no chance in one olass,
being reduced in weight to take a prize in a class of diminutive
abortions; or a bull mastiff of 1001b. being given a prize as a bulldog in
a class made for the apparently special purpose of excluding the true
breed from competition. For, as some people’s “ geese are all swans,” so
some people’s mongrels are said to be all bulldogs.

In the “good old times,” when this dog was kept by all classes, its
characteristic qualities were so highly prized as to cause it to be chosen
as the type of the national character of that famed “ British bulldog
courage ’ ’ and tenacity of purpose which has earned for the nation the
rank it has attained amongst the first powers of the world ; yet now,
when it is commonly said of British institutions, ‘ ‘ they do these things
much better abroad, ’ ’ and the sturdy policy of our ancestors seems out
of fashion, the type of the old “ British bulldog pluck,” still vaunted by
reformers, is neglected and forgotten by the nation, except for he
purposes of ignorant abuse.

They call ns for our fierceness, English dogges.

Now, like to whelpes, we crying run away.

Hearke, countrymen! Eyther renew the fight
Or teare the lyons out of England’s coat—

Renounce your soyle.

When bull baiting went out of fashion and ceased to be patronised by﻿The Bulldog.

225

the upper classes, it was continued by the lower orders, who preserved
the pure breed of bulldogs. In the controversy that preceded the
passing of the Act of Parliament which made bull baiting illegal, the
ill-used bulldog (though it merely served the purposes of his more brutal
and degraded masters) was represented by its former admirers as the
incarnation of ferocity, “ loving bloodshed and combat,” &c.; and to
be the cause rather than the instrument for perpetrating the cruelties
desired to be suppressed. Most modern authors who have expatiated on
dogs, unable to ignore the existence of the bulldog, and having no actual
knowledge of him from experience, have been reduced, as the only means
of oovering their ignorance, to repeat the incorrect statements

...........Of one whose hand,

Like base Judean, threw a pearl away
Richer than all his tribe......

Such writers have declared the bulldog to be capable of no education,
and fitted for nothing but ferocity and combat, entirely deficient in the
virtues of the canine race, and, although belonging to the order canidce,
soaroely reclaimed from a wild state, never, under any circumstances, to
be trusted, and as dangerous as a fresh-caught tiger. The reverse of
suoh statements is truth, as may be proved by anyone who will but make
the experiment. Like that of the whole species,

His nature is too noble for the world;

He would not flatter Neptune for his trident

Or Jove for his power to thunder. His heart’s his mouth;

What hiB breast forges that his tongue must vent;

And, being angry, does forget that ever
He heard the name of death.

“ Give a dog a bad name and hang him ” is an old proverb which has
been, unfortunately, exemplified at the expense of the British bulldog.
“ The virtues of the dog are his own, his vices those of his master.” The
bulldog is, in fact, a dog—neither more nor less, and as capable as any
other variety of dog of being “ the companion and friend of man.”

A gentle dog; as mild as beauty’s breath
To win man's gratitude or ’bide his WTath;

Tame as a spirit fading into death,

Or sunshine sleeping on a lion’s path;
Affectionate as Desdemona’s love.

Whose sweet endurance all its wrong withstood;
A oreature, dwelling on God’s earth, to prove
Bad men should blush to And a dog so good.

﻿226

British Dogs.

Like children, dogs have their mental characters formed by their
training and associations, and, although different individuals have
different dispositions or temperaments, it is not to be imagined that they
have different natures. It has been truly said, “ the god of the dog is
man ; ” if, therefore, a dog is treated by man as though it were a fiend
incarnate, to be ruled with the harshest measures and used in the most
cruel and dangerous occupations, to have all the good feelings of its
nature crushed by its master, who takes a pride in its ferocity, is it to be
wondered at that the poor beast which survives the hardening process
should appear to merit the bad character assigned to it by those only
who fear it P If all affection is suppressed by ill-usage, and the animal
is kept chained and solitary, in order to cultivate a savage disposition, it
learns to look upon man as its enemy, and to be ready to resent the
brutality it expects, so that if any—it matters not what—breed of dog be
reared in such a manner, the result must be the same if the dog has
sufficient courage to sustain its trials ; if not so gifted, the speedy result
will be a spiritless and treacherous brute, an equal disgrace to its trainer;
and libel on its race. But if reared and trained with the same care and
kindness expended on other breeds, “ there is,” as Dr. Cains says of it,
“no dog that can serve the sundry uses of men so aptly or so conveniently
as this sorts.”

His temper, therefore, must be wel observed;

Chide him for bis faults, and do it reverently,

When you perceive his blood inclined to mirth.

But, being moody, give him line and scope,

Till that bis passions, hke a whale on ground,

Confound themselves with working.

For his celebrated invincible courage the bulldog was at first selected
as the only dog with sufficient endurance to serve the cruel purposes of
depraved owners, and the utmost that can be proved against him is that
he has been, and still is, in many instances, more ill-treated and worse
trained than any other dog.

Most “fanciers” of bulldogs know more about other breeds than the
authorities on other breeds know about bulldogs, and have adopted that
breed only after a long experience of the others. The fairest way is to
“ speak of a man as you find him,” and who can know more about a dog
than its keeper ? But it is avowedly those who do not and dare not
keep bulldogs that take upon themselves to condemn the breed. Its
chief virtues they misrepresent as unpardonable faults. The high﻿The Bulldog.

227

courage and indifference to pain which enabled the bnlldog to limp with
<halooated shonlderB or dismembered limbs (like Witherington in “ Chevy
Chase ’ ’) to pin the bnll at the command of his wealthy master, also
enable the dog, now its former cruel occupation is abandoned, to suffer
patiently trials which no other breed could so quietly endure, rendering
him the staunchest and most reliable companion and the most capable of
being taught—

Even as one would say—precisely; thus I would teach a dog.

“Manners makyth man,” quoth William of Wykeham, and surely it
may be said that the manners also make the dog ; if a dog is capable of
being trained to the perfection of canine intelligence and fidelity, he
ought not to be undeservedly condemned. There are many people who can
testify and prove that the bulldog can be so trained “precisely.” Several
owners of bulldogs have assured me that in their opinion it is the only
kind of dog that can with perfect safety be trusted alone to the meroy of
children, than which there can hardly be a greater trial of patience and
good temper. Having from my earliest recolleotion been accustomed to
dogs, and having possessed specimens of almost every breed of dog, I
consider myself, from experience, competent to contradict the statements
made to the disparagement of this breed, whose cause I now advocate.
In proof I can show one which for nine years has been the constant com-
panion and playfellow of my only child. It succeeded in my household
a fine Mount St. Bernard, and has proved itself in every way fully, if not
more than, equal to any of its predecessors in endurance, fidelity, and
sagaoity. When first bronght home the dog was chained to a kennel in
the garden, whence my little child, then not three years old, brought it
indoors to play with. It has since remained always loose in the house,
and has, with others of the same breed, daily sustained trials which
none but a bulldog could endure without “ showing its teeth.” Food or
bones oan be taken away from them without any exhibition of illtemper,
whilst they are as good watoh dogs as possible, and under the most
complete oontrol. I could adduce plenty of little anecdotes in proof of
the bulldog’s intelligence; but as every dog owner can do the same of
his own dog, and not having spaoe for snoh, I will only repeat that there
are many people who can corroborate my assertion that the bulldog
is inferior to no other dog, and that ferooity is not natural to this

Q2﻿228

British Dogs.

more than any other breed. If anyone has reared either a child or a
dog which fails to meet his approval, he should criticise his own
disposition and method of training to discover how the faults he
condemns have been acquired. As the only plausible objection that
has been advanced against the bulldog is its appearance, it is a
matter of surprise that bulldog breeders have not the good taste to
take the same pains to study the art of breeding for colour which they
take to produce the broad mouth, short face, and other points by which
the dog is judged. By so doing they would remove the prejudice im-
pressed on the admirers of other breeds by the pied specimens. The
colour is the most conspicuous point to a casual observer, and when a
bulldog is white and unevenly pied with brindled patches and a patch
over one eye and ear, and appears red and raw round its eyes, and
wherever its coat is thin, it is no wonder that fanciers of Pomeranians,
Italian greyhounds, and other breeds so diametrically opposed, should
decline to admit the bulldog’s claim to beauty. But when of uniform
colour—brindle, red, or fawn—the bulldog is in many respects more
attractive than several other canine pets; for example, the modern King
Charles spaniel, &c.; and if its colour be whole and a “ Bmut,” like the
pug whose

Mouth was black as bulldog’s at the stall,

it is in every way to be preferred to that dog, being handsomer as well as
more useful, faithful, and intelligent. White animals have not generally
as strong constitutions as dark coloured ones, and are, therefore, much
more liable to disease. When bred together they frequently produce
“ricketty” or deaf whelps.

“A Staffordshire Farmer,” writing to a newspaper, said that he
has found from long experience that two good bulldogs always loose
in his yard do much more towards making his neighbours honest than
all the parson’s preaching. Many writers often testify to the good
qualities of the bulldog in the “Field,” “Bell’s Life,’’ &c. Meyrick
speaks most highly of it in his book. “Idstone” says, “The bull-
dog is the source of courage and perseverance. . . invigorates the
constitution and strengthens the nerves of certain breeds.” “Stone-
henge,” the highest modern authority on such matters, says, “The
bulldog is indisputably of British origin, and has never been permanently
introduced into any other country. ... If the brain is weighed with﻿The Bulldog.

229

the body of the dog, it will be found relatively above the average . . .
the mental qualities of the bulldog may be highly cultivated, and in
brute courage and unyielding tenacity of purpose he Btands unrivalled
amongst quadrupeds. . . . From confinement to their kennels they are
often deficient in intelligence . . . but when differently treated the bull-
dog is a very different animal, the brutal nature which he often displays
being mainly attributable to the savage human beings with whom he
associates. . . . Yet I contend that this is not natural to him any more
than stupidity or want of affection which may readily be proved to be
the reverse of his character if anyone will take the trouble to treat him
in a proper manner. . . . The bulldog has been described as stupidly
ferocious, &c., but this is untrue, he being an excellent watch and as a
guard unequalled . . . far from quarrelsome. ... If once the pure
breed is allowed to drop, the best means of infusing fresh courage into
degenerate breeds will be finally lost . . . for I believe that every kind
of dog possessed of very high courage owes it to a cross with the bull-
dog. ... I am sure my brother sportsmen will see the bad taste of
running down a dog which with all its faults is not only the most
courageous dog, but the moBt courageous animal in the world.” I
think this alone is sufficient testimony in the bulldog’s favour, and
fully endorse the words of the poet Smart:

Well! of all dogs, it stands confessed,

Tour English bulldogs axe the best!

I sa; it and will set my hand to it;

Oambden records it, and I’ll stand to it.

The outline of Rosa, in the well-known print of “ Crib and Rosa,” is
considered to represent perfection in the shape, make, and size of the
ideal type of the bulldog. The only exception that has ever been taken
is, that it has been alleged to be deficient in wrinkles about the head
and neck, and also in substance of bone in the limbs. This, however,
does not alter the fact of its being a correct representation of the true
type of the old-fashioned bulldog. Some allowance should be made for
her sex—never as grand and well developed as dogs—and her position in
the drawing.

We are indebted to Mr. T. W. Wood for the faithful portrait of Capt.
Holds worth’s Sir Anthony, one of the best bulldogs of his day. He
took first prize in the open olass at the Crystal Falaoe, 1874. He was by
Crib ex Meg, Crib by Duke H. ex Rush, by King George ex Blossom;﻿230

British Dogs.

Meg, by Old King Dick ex Old Nell, by Old Dan. As Sir Anthony has
since unfortunately met with a fatal accident, a second engraving of
another very good, though not such a perfect, specimen is given. Mr.
Donkin’s Byron—of whom, in its report of the Bulldog Club’s third
show, where Byron won second prize—the “Live Stock Journal’’ said,
on May 16, 1879, “ He is a red dog, broad in muzzle, with good legs and
ehest, and excellent feet;” and “The Country” said, “ He is a good
all round dog, with no faults, but no superlative qualities.” Byron is a
red smut, 451bs., by Gibbon’s Dan ex Bose, by Tiger ex Bush; Tiger by
Crib.

Amongst the public stud dogs of the present day, the following, though
not each faultless, are considered to approaoh and fairly represent the true
type described and sought to be preserved and perfected : Mr. Baper’s
Tiger (full brother to Sir Anthony), Mr. Shirley’s Sancho Panza, Mr.
Pearl’s Duke, Mr. Benjamin’s Smasher, Mr. Shaw’s Sepoy, Mr.Yerinder’s
Slenderman, Mr. Ball’s Lord Nelson, Capt. Holdsworth’s Doon Brae,
Mr. Webb’s Faust, and especially Mr. Donkin’s Byron and Mr. Baper’s
Bichard Coeur de Lion, for their possession of the broad lower jaw, with
the six front teeth in an even row—the chief bulldog point to be
produced and transmitted, and in which too many of Crib’s descendants
show a deplorable deficiency, very different from the bulldogs like the old
Boniface strain bred about twenty years ago by such breeders as Messrs.
Brent, H. Brown, Parker, Scott, Stookdale, Wickens, and Bivers-
Wilson. A new aspirant for supreme honours has lately put in an
appearance in the person of Monarch, bred by Mr. Berrie, which is
reported as more admirable than any bulldog of the present day. It
is, however, rumoured that even he will be forced to abdicate in his
turn in favour of Conqueror, a puppy of extraordinary promise, bred by
Mr. James Collins, from Slenderman ex Nell Gwynne.

Breeders Bhould remember, before deciding upon the sire, that correct
form and pedigree on the female side are quite as necessary for successful
breeding as on the male side, and that the numbers of prizes won by the
parents are no guide to judicious mating.

By Mr. Dalziel’s desire I append certain measurements of a few
specimens of both sexes of the breed (all I could procure in the short
time at my command), in order to show the average proportions of the
true bred bulldog. I consider the measurements given in the specimen﻿﻿﻿The Bulldog.

231

page of Stnd Book (at the end hereof) most suitable, but those nsed
suffice to show the proportion that the largeness of the skull and muzzle
and the shortness of the face—which are the principal points of the true
breed—should bear to the size, i.e., the weight of the animal. Any great
increase in size above 501b. mnst be the result of impure breeding with
foreign crosses, and, although giving larger measurements, they are
found, on comparison with the increased size, to be unaccompanied with
the corresponding inorease desired (but rather a decrease) in the
proper proportions. For instance, a bulldog 461b. measuring 20in.
round skull, and a dog 901b. measuring 22in. round skull, of totally
different types, but both awarded prizes as bulldogs, proves the necessity
of judging all dogs together by “general appearance,” irrespective of
weight.

v

COMPARATIVE TABLE OP MEASUREMENTS (IN INCHES).

		'S		8‘.	3  %  43  M		of head. Oc- to tip of nose.	Girth of				
OwNEB.	Bulldog’s  Name.	el Club St Book.		'd  1  H				©  'n  a				Forearm.	J
		J	bo  *5  £	43  §  CD  w	©  CQ  il	Tail.	1!  a		1  £	Chest.	d	
Mr. Geo. Raper’s ... Mr. Alfred Benja- min’s (late Mr. Vero Shaw’s)  Mr. J. Pearl’s		Tiger 	  1 )	2658	lbs.  49	151	28	81	61	12	19	25	191	71
	[•Smasher ...	)	6554	46	17	31	8	61	121	20	261	17	7
	J	J  Duke 		8560	52	18	30	101	5	hi	20	28	21	71
Mr. Garaev's (late Mr. Berne’s)	| King Cole II. j-	7575	38	141	281	6	5	in	181	25	17	7
Mr. Do^lriTi'a ,,,	Byron 	  Caractacus			45	16	30	91	5	101	19	25	19	7
Mr. Crater's 			6531	40	17	28	81	6	11	171	95	17	7
Mr. Crater’s 	  Mr. Crater’s 		Prince Bnpert ... Gipsy Coantess... f Clytie (sister to 1	5162	56	20	35	12	7	12	19	29	201	81
		5478	44	16	29	8	6	101	18	28	22	61
Mr. Crater’s 			6562	35	16	27	8	6	91	161	26	19	61
Mr. Jas. Collins’ ...	Nell Gwynne ...	5485	45	151	26	8	51	12	18	28	23	7
Mr. Donkin’s	  Mr. Adcock's		Wasp 	  Toro I.*		2655	40  90	16  22	331  not	8*  gi	54  ven	9  14	17  22	22  31	171  21	6  81

* Taken from Field, of September 29,1873.

The following description of the bulldog, was, after careful considera-
tion, adopted as the standard type of excellence for the breed by the
Bulldog Club, 1875 (of which I was then Hon. Secretary) together with
a scale of marks at which the several points mentioned in the club standard
are relatively valued, and forms of judging and stud books. In adopting﻿232

British Dogs.

the principle of distributing 100 marks amongst the several points of the
bulldog, the Bulldog Club has followed the example of the old National
Dog Club, with whose valuation of the separate points of the bulldog
(as given in “ Stonehenge’s ” “ Dogs of the British Isles ”) the present
scale is almost identical.

“ In forming a critical judgment on the dog the ‘ general appearance ’
(which is the impression the dog makes as a whole on the eye of the
judge) should be first considered. Secondly should be noticed his
size, shape, and make, or rather his proportions in the relation they
bear to each other. No point should be so much in excess of the others
as to destroy the general symmetry of the dog, or make him appear
deformed, or interfere with his powers of motion, &c. Thirdly, his
style, carriage, gait, temper, and his several points should be considered
separately, in detail, due allowance being made for sex, the bitch not being
as grand or as well developed as the dog.

“1. General Appearance. The general appearance of the bulldog is
that of a smooth coated thick set dog, rather low in stature, about 18in.
high at the shoulder, but broad, powerful, and oompact. Its head
strikingly massive, and very large in proportion to the dog’s size. Its
face extremely short, with nose almost between the eyes. Its muzzle very
broad, blunt, truncated, and inclined upwards. Its body short and well
knit; the limbs stout and muscular. Its hind quarters very high and
strong, but rather lightly made in comparison with its massive fore
parts. The dog conveys an impression of determination, strength, and
activity, similar to that suggested by the appearance of a thick set
Ayrshire or Highland bull.

“2. Skull. The head (or skull) should be very large—the larger the
better—and in circumference should measure round in front of the ears
at least the height of the dog at the shoulder. Viewed from the front,
it should be very high from the corner of the lower jaw to the apex of the
skull; it should also be broad and square. The cheeks should be well
rounded, and extend sideways beyond the eyes. Viewed at the side,
the head should be very high, and very short from its back to the point
of the nose. The forehead should be flat, neither prominent, rounded,
nor overhanging the face; and the skin upon it and about the head very
loose, hanging in large folds or wrinkles.

“3. Stop. The temples or frontal bones should be very prominent,﻿The Bulldog.

233

broad, square, and high, causing a groove between the eyes. This
indentation is termed the ‘Stop,’ it should be both broad and deep,
and extended up the middle of the forehead, dividing the head vertically,
and be traoeable at the top of the skull.

“4. Eyes. The eyes (seen from the front), should be situated low down
in the skull, as far from the ears as possible. Their corners should be in
a straight line at right angles with the stop, and quite in front of the
head. They should be as wide apart as possible, provided their outer
oorners are within the outline of the cheeks. They should be quite
round in shape, of moderate size, neither sunken nor prominent, and
in colour should be as dark as possible, showing no white when looking
directly forward.

“ 5. Ears. The ears should be set on high, i.e., the front inner edge of
each ear should (as viewed from the front) join the outline of the skull
at the top corner of such outline, so as to place them as wide apart
and as high and far from the eyes as possible. In size they should be
small and thin. The shape termed ‘ rose ear ’ is the most correct.
The ‘ rose ear ’ folds inwards at its back, the upper or front edge,
curving over outwards and backwards, showing part of the inside of the
burr.

“ 6. Face. The face, measured from the front of the cheek bone
to the nose, should be as short as possible ; its skin should be
deeply and closely wrinkled. The muzzle should be short, broad, square,
not pointed, turned upwards, and very deep from the corner of the eye
to the oomer of the mouth. The nose should be large, broad, and black ;
its top should be deeply set back, almost between the eyes. The distance
from the inner corner of the eye (or from the centre of the stop between
the eyes) to the extreme tip of the nose should not exceed the length
from the tip of the nose to the edge of the under lip. The nostrils
should be large, wide, and black, with a well defined straight line between
them.

“7. Chop. The flews, called tho ‘chop,’ should be thick, broad,
pendent, and very deep, hanging completely over the lower jaw at the
sides (not in front). They should join the under lip in front and quite
oover the teeth, which should not be seen when the mouth is closed.

“ 8. Mouth. The jaws, more especially the lower, should be broad,
massive, and square, not in any way pinched or pointed, the canine﻿234

British Dogs.

teeth, or tusks, wide apart. The lower jaw should project considerably
in front of the upper, and turn up. It should be very broad and square,
and have the six small front teeth between the canines in an even row.
The teeth should be large and strong.

“ 9. Neck and Chest. The neck should be moderate in length, rather
short than long, very thick, deep, and strong. It should be well arched
at the back, with much loose, thick, and wrinkled skin hanging about
the throat, forming a double dewlap on each side from the lower jaw
to the chest. The chest should be very wide laterally, round, prominent,
and deep, making the dog appear very broad and short-legged in front.

“ 10. Shoulders. The shoulders should be broad, slanting, deep, and
very powerful.

“ 11. Body. The barrel should be capacious, round, and deep. It
should be very deep from the top of the shoulders to its lowest part, where
it joins the chest, and be well let down between the fore legs. It should
be large in diameter, and round behind the fore legs (not flat-sided, the
ribs being well rounded). The body should be well ribbed up behind,
with the belly tncked up, and not pendulous.

“12. Back. The back should be short, broad, and strong, very broad at
the shoulders and comparatively narrow at the loins. There shonld be a
slight fall in the back close behind the shoulders (its lowest part), whence
the spine should rise to the loins (the top of which should be higher than
the top of the shoulder), thence curving again more suddenly to the tail,
forming an arch—(a distinctive characteristic of the breed)—termed
‘roach back,’ or, more correctly, ‘wheel back.’

“13. Tail. The tail, termed the ‘stern,’ should be set on low, jut out
rather straight, and then turn downwards, the end pointing horizontally.
It should be quite round in its whole length, smooth, and devoid of fringe
or coarse hair. It should be moderate in length—rather short than long
—thick at the root, and tapering rather quickly to a fine point. It should
have a downward carriage (not having a decided upward curve at the end
or being screwed or deformed), and the dog should, from its shape and
position, not be able to raise it over his back.

“14. Fore Legs. The fore legs should be very stout and strong, set
wide apart, thick, muscular, and straight, with well-developed calves,
presenting a rather bowed outline, but the bones of the legs should be
large and straight, not bandy or curved. They Bhould be rather short in﻿The Bulldog.

235

proportion to the hind legs, hnt not so short as to make the back appear
long, or to detract from the dog’s activity and so cripple him. The
elbows should he low and stand well away from the ribs. The ankles,
or pasterns, should be short, straight, and strong. The fore feet should
be straight, and turn very slightly inwards ; they should be of medium
size, and moderately round. The toes short, compact, and thick, being
well Bplit up, making the knuckles prominent and high.

“ 15. Hind Legs. The hind legs should be large and muscular, and
longer in proportion than the fore legs, so as to elevate the loins. The
hooks should be very slightly bent and well let down, so as to be long and
muscular from the loins to the point of the hock. The lower part of the
leg should be short, straight, and strong. The stifles should be round,
and turn slightly outwards away from the body. The hocks are thereby
made to approach each other, and the hind feet to turn outwards. The
latter, like the fore feet, should be round and compact, with the toes short,
well split up and the knuckles prominent. From his formation, the dog
has a peculiar heavy, slouching, and constrained gait, appearing to walk
with short quick steps on the tips of his toes, his hind feet not be lifted
high, but appearing to skim the ground, and often running with the one
shoulder rather advanced, similar to the manner of ahorse in cantering.

“ 16. Size. The most desirable size for the bulldog, and at which
excellence is mostly attained, is about 501b.

“ 17. Coat and Colour. The coat should be fine in texture, short, close,
and smooth (hard only from its shortness and closeness, not wiry or
woolly). The colour should be whole or smut, that is, a whole colour
with a blaok mask or muzzle. It should be brilliant and pure
of its sort. As ca good horse oannot be of a bad colour,’ the Bame
may be said of the dog if perfeot in other points. The colours, in their
order of merit, if bright and pure, are, first smuts, and whole brindles,
reds, white, with their varieties, as whole fawns, fallows, &c.; second,
pied and mixed oolours. Black, whioh was once most esteemed, is now
considered undesirable.”

Overleaf I give a table of the points by which bulldogs were to be
judged by the Bulldog Club, and a oopy of the form which should be
used by the judge.﻿* SCALE OF MAEKS FOE JUDGING BULLDOGS BY

CD

EH

H

Ph

236	British Dogs.﻿FOEM TO BE USED IN JUDGING BULLDOG CLASSES.

The Bulldog.

237

eg

TJ

^ ©
w D

•3 a

o

w

o

8 'S

13 a

£ &

I «

“ |

p I

~S 8

1 §

60 A

SI

««

I It

a

3 1

A _

E i

A
fc

a S
g E

§ta

® •

A ®g
8

A 3

“ tj

i  i  is	Bather coarse; savage —Commended.		First Prize and Cup.		Second Prize.	
*P0!J4OITO B3[I0Jtt JO bib^ox qojff	S		in		^jo_^	
‘UILLIULXUIAI O  Io?ox 2	&	-	in	;	8	-
	Positive Total... |	Negative Total... 1	Positive Total... |	Negative Total... 1	Positive Total... |	Negative Total...
•^00	10	09	=		;	00	;
•azig	10	00	:	04	:	90	!
■093^ PTTB B39T[ pmH	90	:	04	:	00	=
'mi pire  S39-J WOJ 10	00	=	04	:	00	:
•IFBX	US	i	-	90	:	-	=
•^oaa us	00	;	00	=	m	:
•^poa	us	04	:	90	:	»	i
•aioptnoqg kO -		:	04	!	00	;
pre°$qD 10	90	:	90	:	m	:
•qpaojj;	US	eq	=	in	:		•
•doqo	US	-	:		:	00	
‘90UJ	IQ	00	;	m	;		:
■area	10	90	:		;	!	-
•saia >0		:	in	;	90	:
•dosg	us		:	»£0	i	in	:
•IIW19	S	O	:		:	0	:
aeonui99ddy q JBI9U90	|H	«o	:	03	•	00	:
•9 o>  3	§		i		§	

IgfllfJ

•Ss'-g^a

a®

§<3

fi o*,

H||!

Mi-sis

Wg " a4"

«l8jaa|

Plf

Hl?|l

JMii

igth!

IIPIS

s|§#f

fill's

i&SfSs

|HS1

IlfilS

fill

llPil

'SS'S^p?

til

mt

lyfigl

Midi?﻿238

British Dogs.

SPECIMEN PAGE OP BULL DOG CLUB STUD BOOK.

Bull Dog Club Stud Book________________________No.___________

Entry in Produce Register______________________Page__________

Ditto in any other Stud Book_________________________________

Name of Dog or Bitoh_________________________________________

Date of birth____________day of___________________________18_

Breeder, Mr.__________________

Of.

Detailed Description, verified by Mr—
of the Club).

(a Member

Round skull (before ears) ......

Breadth of stop (between inner 1

comer of eyes).............../

From outer comer of eye to ear..

Across forehead (between ears) .

Length of face (inner comer of eye 1

to tip of nose) .............J

Tip of nose to edge of lip .....

Round chop (close before eyes) .

Between points of lower canines ...

Inches

Width of chest between forelegs ...

Height at top of shoulders ......

Height of elbow from the ground...
Length of body (top of shoulder!

to root of tail..............J

Girth of barrel close behind elbows

Height at top of loins...........

Girth of foreleg below elbow ....

Weight_______lbs.

[Space for critical description of style, colour, markings, and other points, or for
photograph.]

Litter.

Sire and Dam.

' Grand Sires
and Dams.

Great Grand Great Great Grand
Sires and Dams. Sires and Dams.

Owner’s Address.

Stud fee <£_

The dog’s history to be written on other side.﻿﻿in

PQ

c/5

6

fed

s

■3

04

co

cj

£

£

0

=2

oT

CO

C4

to

R

£

&

cT

s

«

1
m
fO
fO
N

<*i

CO

<o

£

•«

’I

*<

£﻿The Mastiff.

239

Measurements of Bulldogs—

Mr. J: W. Gurney’s King Cole: Age, born 31st Deo., 1875; weight,
41flb.; height at Bhoulder, 14f in.; length from nose to set on of tail,
28fin.; length of tail, 6in.; girth of chest, 26in.; girth of loin, 18fin.;
girth of head, 18fin.; girth of forearm, 7 fin.; length of head from
occiput to tip of nose, 5frn. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, llfin.; length of nose, fin.; width comer of inside of eye, fin.

Puppy, 4f months: Bound skull before ears, 13fin.; height at
shoulder, 13fin.; comer of eye to tip of nose, lfin. ; tip of nose to top
of under lip, lfin.; depth of flew, 3in.; weight, 201b.; colour, white.
Pedigree: Slenderman out of Duchess; Slenderman, Sir Anthony—
Whuskie; Duohess, Turton’sCrib—Whuskie.

Chapter VIII.—THE MASTIFF.

By Corsincon.

It is not my intention to write a history of the old English mastiff, or to
attempt to trace his origin or prove him the indigenous dog of Britain.
Suoh a task would require more ability and research than I can devote to
it, whilst, if undertaken, it is doubtful if the result would be commen-
surate with the labour it would demand.

I cannot, however, quite ignore that part of the subject, deeply
interesting as it is to all who admire the noble qualities of this breed, the
magnificent appearance of which seems to entitle it to “ claims of long
desoent.”

It is an undisputed fact that when the Romans invaded these islands
they found the natives possessed of a fierce and powerful breed of dogs,
which they used in war, and during the Roman occupation dogs con-
stituted a not inconsiderable article in the exportations of that period;
and of such importance was this branch of commerce considered, that a
special officer was appointed by the emperors to superintend the selection
and transmission of them. Some of these exported dogs were used by the﻿240

British Dogs.

Romans for hunting, and, as they are written of as a small dog, probably
corresponded to some extent with our modern beagle. They are thus
described by Oppiau:

There is a kind of dog of mighty fame
For hunting; worthy of a fairer frame;

By painted Britons brave in war, they're bred,

Are beagles called, and to the chase are led;

Their bodies small, and of so mean a shape,

You’d think them curs that under tables gape.

There were other dogs sent to Rome for more brutal purposes, namely,
to bait the bull and other animals for the amusement of the people in
the amphitheatres. These were the “broad-mouthed dogs of Britain,”
differing, no doubt, very much from either the bulldog or the mastiff of
to-day, but possessing the great strength and indomitable courage that
distinguish both of these breeds, and which bo eminently fitted their pro-
genitors for the rough and hazardous sports for which they were used.

A Latin poet thus refers to them and their employment in the amphi-
theatres :

And British mastiffs break the brawny necks of bulls.

A feat which I imagine could not be literally performed by any dog then
or now.

Although the majority of writers refer these fighting dogs to the
mastiffs, there are others who think the dog so used by the Romans was
the Irish wolfhound ; and this view was cleverly argued by a writer in the
“Field” in 1871, whose letters, signed “E. W. R.,” were reproduced in
“Dogs of the British Islands,” and in these are given quotations showing
that Irish dogs were used in the amphitheatres ; but this does not show
that English dogs were not; indeed, it is certain the sort from which our
mastiffs and bulldogs are descended, were also similarly employed, and
the writer I have referred to appears to me to be wrong when he quotes
Oppian’s description, “ small in size, squat, lean, and shaggy, with blink-
ing eyes and lacerating claws, but mostly prized for their Bcent in tracking
where the foot has passed,” against mastiffs having been so used, and
asks, “ does this description apply to either mastiff or bulldog P ’ ’ The
answer is evident. Oppian was not describing the dog used for bull-
baiting, but the beagle, which the Romans so largely exported from
Britain for hunting purposes.

I do not for a moment think that wolfhound, bulldog, or mastiff, such
as the names now cover, were represented at that date except in a rough﻿The Mastiff.

241

typical way, and the descriptions handed down to ns are far too meagre
and widely-scattered to allow the changes that have taken place , to be
traced with any degree of aoouracy, therefore much is necessarily left
to conjecture. The great Buffon supposed the mastiff to be “a mongrel
generated between the Irish wolfhound and the bulldog, but much larger,
and more resembling the latter than the former.” Practical dog breeders,
with I think good reason, lean to an opposite conclusion—'namely, that
the Irish wolfhound was a combination of mastiff and greyhound blood ;
and in that or similar directions all attempts at the resuscitation of
that lost variety must be made.

It seems clear enough that, oo-extensive with the known history of
these islands, a dog representing, however roughly, the modem mastiff,
has existed, and at an early date he was known in England by that name.
In the forest laws of Henry II., if not earlier, the keeping of these dogs
in or near royal forests was the subject of special regulations, which
would now be considered cruel and oppressive. The statute which
prohibited all but a few privileged individuals from keeping greyhounds
or spaniels provided that farmers and substantial freeholders, dwelling
within the forests, might keep mastiffs for the defence of their houses
within the same, provided Buoh mastiffs be expeditated according to the
laws of the forest.

This “ expeditating,” “hambling,” or “ lawing,” as it was in-
differently termed, was intended so to maim the dog as to reduce to a
minimum the chances of his chasing and seizing the deer, and the law
enforced its being done after the following manner: “ Three claws of the
forefoot shall be out off by the skin, by setting one of his forefeet upon a
piece of wood 8in. thick, and 1ft. square, and with a mallet, setting a
chisel of 2in. broad upon the three claws of his forefeet, and at one blow
cutting them clean off.”

This just enables us to look at the mastiffs of that day as through a
narrow chink in the wall of silenoe that hides from us the past. The 2in.
chisel was intended to out the three doomed claws off at one blow; how
muoh wider would it require to be to perform its work efficiently on Borne
of our best modem specimens P—considerably bo, I think—to make the
“ dean” job of it the instructions intended to provide for; and we may,
therefore, fairly infer that the dogs were altogether less in size than
the grand massive animals that we oan boast of to-day.

B﻿242

British Dogs.

Coming down to the time of Cams and Cotgrave, who both wrote in
the reign of Elizabeth, mastiffs and bulldogs are both mentioned, but no
description of any accuracy is given of either; and to construct a dog
from the loose references made to them sufficient to satisfy a modern
fancier, requires the active aid of imagination, and this, I find, generally
assists writers towards what they wish may have been, and faots of the
slightest character are strained to support pet theories.

For my own part, I feel convinced that the mastiff and the bulldog
have sprung from a common origin. The attributes which they still have
in common, after so many years of breeding towards opposite points,
strengthens me in this belief, which is still further confirmed by a study
of the various engravings and paintings made of them from time to time,
which I have been able to consult, all of which show that the further
back we go, starting from “Stonehenge” on “The Dog,” the more
closely do the two breeds assimilate in general charaoter.

Of our present dogs, the strain for which the greatest, or rather absolute,
purity is olaimed is the Lyme Hall mastiff, whioh has been in the Legh
family since the beginning of the fifteenth century, if not from a still
earlier date ; but whether the existing dogs of this strain have been
kept pure by absolute in-and-in breeding, or with such merely occasional
cross with some closely-allied strain as may have been found necessary to
prevent deterioration, so that we may rely on it as representing the
original type, I have no means of knowing; but as it is held as a pure
representative of the old English mastiff by the family who have
so long had it in their possession, I can have no doubt that good reasons
for that belief exist, and that the strain is at least approximately pure
and best represents the whole breed ; and I am not aware that any other
breeders claim anything approaching to such a long descent for their
dogs, although a strain so noted as the Lyme Hall must long have been
would be sure to spread and leave its mark on such other kennels as
were most likely to be preserved with some degree of purity.

Of late years the champion of the Lyme Hall mastiff has been Mr.
H. D. Kingdon, of Willhayne, Devon, who obtained the breed from Lyme
Hall by the courtesy of the present Mr. Legh, and who insists on their
superiority over all others with a tenacity, and, I might say, dogged
obstinacy, thoroughly English, and worthy of the breed he admires. I
cannot say, however, that I agree with him in his absolute worship of﻿The Mastiff.

243

what he calls parity ; when that term is applied to dogs of any breed my
scepticism is aroused, and, indeed, even could absolute purity be proved,
I would not put the high value on it that many do. Beyond a certain
point, I consider this “purity” positively hurtful; I prefer, as a breeder
of dogs, to look forward rather than back, and like

The gTand old gardener and his wife
Smile at the claims of long descent.

The good old dogs, like the good old times, possess many advantages
over the present, now that distance lends enchantment to the view;
but in my opinion the present dogs are the best, and will as certainly be
excelled by those of the future. To think otherwise would be to admit
that the English, who have succeeded so unquestionably in the improve-
ment of so many other animals, have failed with the dog.

In making these remarks I do not disparage nor even, I hope, under-
estimate the good qualities of the Lyme Hall mastiff. One of the most
astute judges and successful breeders (Mr. Edgar Hanbury) has thought
highly and written of them in most eulogistio terms, giving practical
force to his expressed admiration by introducing them into his own
kennels from Mr. Kingdon’s; and of several of the breed that I have
seen I oan say they were magnificent specimens, and I regret that so
few opportunities are now afforded the public of seeing thenj at shows,
as it is only by actual comparison that a fair judgment on relative
merits of animals can be formed, and in forming such judgment it is
absolutely necessary for agreement that the various judges should adopt
one standard of excellence.

Modem taste in mastiffs seems to require above all things size and
symmetry, and what I contend for is that modern taste has a perfect
right to demand what it pleases in suoh matters. The great evil to be
guarded against is that the standard should not be varied at the caprice
of judges or societies, whose position gives them an adventitious influence
in forming publio taste and opinion. Now, to put a case : if I considered
it necessary to cross the mastiff with the boarhound in order to gain
the desired size, and having gained that point went back to the
mastiff to eliminate other elements which the boarhound crosB had intro-
duced, but which I did not want, I would expect that some members for
a number of generations would, to use a favourite! expression of Mr.
Kingdon’s, exhibit “the discordant elements of which their ancestors

B 2﻿244

British Dogs.

were compounded ” ; but I would also expect that the seventh or eighth
generation at furthest would show no traces of the boarhound, aud
would be as fully entitled to be oalled pure-bred mastiffs as any in or
out of the Stud Book. Hence, in judging mastiffs I do not care to
consider whether they were manufactured twenty years ago, or have
an unspotted lineage from the Flood.

This part of the subject has, however, unwittingly drawn on my space
to a greater extent than I intended it should ; I will, therefore, only say
further that it is self-evident that—while I think judicious crossing in
this and all breeds is not only permissible within certain limits but a
necessity of improvement—although we may produce a fine dog by a
mixture of breeds, we cannot have a mastiff unless that blood is allowed
to predominate, and the older and purer it is the sooner and better it
will assert itself over the introduced blood, as shown in foreign features
engrafted on it, yet that specially desired feature, such as increased size,
may, by selection, be retained.

In general appearance the mastiff is noble and dignified ; his strength
is shown in his immense bone, large, square, and well-knit frame, whilst
the majesty of his carriage, his noble head, and the magnanimous ex-
pression of his countenance bespeak consciousness of power governed by
a noble anjl courageous nature. There are mastiffs with sinister and
scowling faces, exhibiting the ferocity of the coward and bully, but these
will rarely be found to possess the grandeur of form that distinguishes
the breed, and are often cross-bred ; but instances of a surly and dangerous
disposition will show itself in otherwise good and pure dogs, and when
it does, they become a positive danger even to their owners, and a terror
and a nuisance to the neighbourhood in which they may be kept; but the
natural disposition is gentle, with an intuitive desire to afford protection,
so that a well-trained mastiff is at once the best of companions—not
given to quarrel, solicitous of notice from those he serves—and proveB,
with his intelligence and high mettle, the best of guards for person and
property. These good qualities characterise the modern mastiff, and
show the power of man in taming down the fierce nature of the fighting
dogs of Britain, for in this, as in outward form, it is impossible
to doubt he has been greatly modified and improved since he was mainly
kept in order to display his prowesB in the bull ring and the bear
garden.﻿The Mastiff.

245

As to his modem uses, he is still par excellence the watch dog of
England,

Whose honest bark

Bays deep-mouthed welcome as we draw near home.

He is the gamekeeper’s best companion and preserver from night
marauders, and for this purpose a dark brindled dog is preferable to a
fallow, not being so easily seen at night, and to these arduous duties have
been added the lighter ones of companion to ladies and gentlemen, and
the occasional display of his regal canine magnificence on the show bench.

I have mentioned the faults of temper in dealing with the general
character. I will now point out the faults in outward appearance most
often met with. These are, first, I think, the ungainliness of motion
caused by weak legs, particularly shown in the knee joints and the develop-
ment of cow hocks ; with this there is generally flat, lean, wasted hams,
and sometimes light, weak loins, and all these or the cow hooks alone give
a shambling gait that is most objectionable. These defects are often
caused by bad rearing, inferior or insufficient food, want of room or
dampness in the kennel. The faults alluded to are very common, and
it should be the endeavour of breeders and also of judges to get rid of
them—the latter by refusing prizes to all dogs that show the faults, and
the former by judicious selection and careful rearing.

The points of the mastiff are as follows :

The head should be large as a whole, square, skull flat, with great
girth before the ears, forehead broad and fiat, face may be slightly
wrinkled.

The muzzle is black in colour, square and broad, neither so deep nor so
narrow as in the bloodhound, with fairly deep flews, but not the chop of
the bulldog; under jaw may slightly protrude, but it is better the teeth
should meet evenly.

The eyes are small and intelligent, mild in expression, not sunk in the
head, nor showing the haw as in the bloodhound.

The ears are small, pendant, and thin, and lying close to the oheek,
black in colour in the fawns.

The neck should be thick and muscular, and should not have a super-
abundance of loose skin.

The chest should be deep and broad, back of fair length, but strong,
loins musoular, the back ribs well developed; a out-up flank, as is often
seen in very long-bodied dogs, is very objectionable.﻿246

British Dogs.

The leg bone shonld be very great, round and straight; the feet large-
and round—a splay foot and weak joints are great objections.

The thighs should be large, wide, and well clothed with muscle ; hocks
straight—cow-hocks are one of the worst faults. The stem, must be a
good length, straight, moderately covered with hair, and carried pretty
straight, not hound-like or over the back; a ring tail is held to be very
objectionable.

The average height of dogs may be put as about 31in. at shoulder,
bitches 29in.; but the higher the better if the dog’s body is well
let down, and his weight increases with height in proper ratio.

The coat is a minor point, often depending on feeding, grooming, &c.
As a rule, the lighter the colour the finer the texture. It should be dense
and not too soft.

Colour is another minor point. The fashionable colours are bright
fawn with black muzzles and ears, and brindles of various shades. There
are also good ones of a decided red tinge ; white on neck, face, or legs a
very slight objection.

The subject of our engraving is The Shah, the property of Mr. C. T.
Harris, 15, Fenchurch-street, City. The Shah is a fawn dog, standing a
little over 32in. at the shoulder, and weighs 1801b. Further measure-
ment I have not had an opportunity of obtaining, but he is a dog of
remarkably true proportions, making a grand whole, as is well shown
by our artist, Mr. T. W. Wood.

The Shah came out as a puppy at the Crystal Palace Show, 1874, where
he took first in a strong class, and was claimed by his present owner at
catalogue price, .£100. Since then the following are his prizes, having
won wherever shown :	First Crystal Palace, first Birmingham, first

Maidstone, champion prize Brighton, 1876; special prize in champion
class, Agricultural Hall, Islington, 1877. Champion prize Birmingham,
1877, first Bristol, 1877. Twenty Guineas Silver Cup, Margate, 1878,
champion prize Alexandra Palace, 1878, and the same prize there, July,
1879, where his son, Mrs. Eawlinson’s The Emperor, out of champion
Countess, and his daughter, Mr. Fletcher’s Lady Love, out of a Monarch
bitch, were first in their respective classes, with a number of others by
The Shah in the prize list.

Of late and present breeders whose dogs have held the highest position
in competition, or transmitted their good qualities to those that do, I﻿The Mastiff.

247

may specially mention Mr. Lukey, Mr. Rowe, Mr. Bill George, the late
Miss Aglionby (breeder of the celebrated Turk, who so many years held
sway as champion), Mrs. Bawlinson, whose champion Countess has pro-
duced such grand ones as ThyTa, Stanley, and now, in a younger litter,
The Emperor, probably the grandest mastiff living, and likely to be for
the next few years the champion in his class. Mr. T. C. Harris, owner
of The Shah, a dog that has begot the best young stock of the day. Mr.
Edgar Hanbury, owner and breeder of many good ones, including Rajah,
sire of the Shah and Wolsey. Mr. W. K. Taunton, whose preference is
for good brindles. Mr. Forbes Winslow, possessor of a good team, and
Dr. J. Lamond Hemming, owner of His Lordship, one of the very best;
and Mr. Carr, owner of Leo by Monarch, who, as a young dog, made his
mark at Northern shows, taking the place of that grand dog The Colonel,
after the death of that dog.

The following are the measurements of a few mastiffs of note :

Mr. Richard Cook’s Sylvia III: Age, 2 years ; weight, 1361b; height
at shoulder, 29£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 50in. ; length of
tail, 18£in. ; girth of chest, 37in. ; girth of loin, 29in.; girth of head,
23£in.; girth of forearm, 10£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, lOiin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 14in.

Dr. J. Lamond Hemming’s His Lordship (champion) : Age, 1 year and
10 months ; weight, 1801b.; height at shoulder, 33in. ; length from nose
to set on of tail, 53in.; length of tail, 22in.; girth of chest, 44in. ; girth
of loin, 36in.; girth of forearm, lliin.; length of head, from occiput to
tip of nose, 12in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
15£in.; girth of head, 28£in.

Mr. T. W. Allen’s Creole : Age 4 years ; weight, 1201b.; height at
shoulder, 29in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 51in.; length of tail,
18}in.; girth of chest, 36in.; girth of loin, 27£in.; girth of head, 23in.;
girth of forearm, 9£in. j length of head from ocoiput to tip of nose, 10£in.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 13$in.; colour,
fawn and black points.

Mr. J. W. Allen’s Magnus: Age, 2 years 6 months ; weight, 1551b.;
height at shoulder, 30£in.; girth of chest, 41^in.; girth of loin, 31£in. ;
girth of head, 27£in.; girth of forearm, 10£in.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 14£in.; colour, fawn and black points.

Mr. Morton’s Rupert (K.C.S.B., 7433) : Age, 3 years and 4 months ;﻿248

British Dogs.

weight, 1701b. ; height at shoulder, 31|in,; length from nose to set on of
tail, 57in.; length of tail, 21in. ; girth of chest, 42in.; girth of loin,
33in.; girth of head, 27£in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 12^in.;
girth of leg lin. below elbow, llin.; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, 12in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
15£in.; colour and markings, fawn, black points.

Chapter IX.—THE ST. BERNARD.

By Corsincon.

Among the large-sized companion ‘ ‘ dogs of the day ’ ’ there can be no
doubt of the St. Bernard occupying the position of chief favourite with the
public at the present time. The large classes brought together at our
principal shows furnish sufficient proof of this ; and although I do not
accept the decline in the entries of Mastiffs at the Crystal Palace Show,
1878, and again at the Alexandra Palace in 1879, as in itself proof
of their fall in popular favour, any more than I take the inferior quality
of the exhibits at the former as evidence of the decadence of the breed,
yet it is significant that there were nearly seventy entries of St. Ber-
nards to forty of mastiffs in the first case, and over seventy to fifty in
the second, and at most leading shows now the former breed is invariably
well represented both in numbers and quality.

The history of the St. Bernard in this country is but a short one, and
there is no mystery or doubt about the present generation of them aB
far as their immediate progenitors are concerned; but many of the most
illustrious sires we have had, dogs whose blood is destined to infinenoe
many future generations, from having begot the grandest of the breed
yet seen, are without pedigree, or have merely a sire and dam attributed
to them by name, which, for any information it gives, might as well be
by Jack, out of Jill. The great ambition seems to be expressed in the
constantly repeated phrase, “ Descended from the celebrated Barry.”
There is a degree of indefiniteness about this which Bhould tempt some
bold exhibitor to go a step further and bring out one ‘ ‘ descended from﻿﻿﻿The St. Bernard.

249

the celebrated dog of Bernard de Meuthon, sire of the whole illustrious
race who lived and begat whelps in the seventh decade of the tenth
century.”

Whether the existing dogs are indeed descended more or less directly
from the dog of the noble-hearted monk whose name these hospitals and
the breed of dogs still bear, and to whose large-heartedness and manly
charity they constitute a noble monument, I am unable to say; but, as
the portrait of the saint’s original dog, still preserved with that of him-
self at the hospital, is described as a bloodhound, there are more
unlikely things ; for whatsoever their origin may be, it. is an indisputable
fact that many specimens, acknowledged to be true St. Bernards, do still
exhibit some of the most marked bloodhound characteristics—the red
haw, pendulous chops, and throatiness—although these points are not
approved when strongly developed. That our present St. Bernards are
composed of different and somewhat discordant elements I think they in
themselves furnish sufficient evidence, for in large classes we meet with a
variety of types that, by pedigree, have an equal claim to be called pure
bred.

It appears from the records in the various books on the subject that
some half century ago the monks lost all their dogs, they, with several
servants, havmg been swept away by an avalanche, and at that time,
according to “ Stonehenge,” two dogs that the monks had previously
given away were returned to them, and from these the existing breed are
descended. “ Idstone,” who wrote from information gleaned on the
spot when a guest of the monks, says (writing in 1872): “The breed of
St. Bernards has undergone some changes within the last thirty or forty
years. A pest or virulent distemper at one time carried off all the dogs
of the St. Bernard but one, and that, I believe, was crossed with the
Pyrenean wolfhound.” “Idstone” doubtless had good ground for
making this statement, and possibly to the introduction of the wolfhound
oross we may attribute the tendency to a lanky form and elongated
muzzle seen in otherwise good specimens.

What other crosses may have been at different times resorted to in the
course of nine centuries it is now impossible to say, but it is not likely
that strict in-and-in breeding either could or would be adhered to, and
no doubt the monks would aim more at preserving the characteristics of
strength, courage, enduranoe of cold, with that high intelligence and﻿250

British Dogs.

docility which, with the special aptitude for tracing buried footways and
discovering lost travellers, had been developed by keeping these animals
to special work, and all of which qualities were essential to their canine
assistants in carrying out their arduous and charitable tasks. “ Stone-
henge” speaks of a Newfoundland cross having been tried and failed, and
even speaks of Mr. Gresham’s Monk as having too much of the Newfound-
land type. I confess I can see nothing in Monk of the Newfoundland
type, if that be the true type of Newfoundland, as I think it is, which
“ Stonehenge ” has given us in the engraving of Mr. Howard Mapplebeck’s
Leo in his latest work.

In the Rev. J. Cumming Macdona’s imported black and tan dog Meu-
thon we had something nearer to the Newfoundland type, but perhaps
still closer to the Thibet mastiff.

To attempt, then, to trace the pedigrees of our present St. Bernards
further than has been done in the Kennel Club Stud Book would be fruit-
less. We are directed in it to our earlier imported dogs, many of whom
had no known pedigree, and to others vaguely referred to as descendants of
Barry, a dog that made his name famouB by the great number of lives he
saved—forty-two according to “Idstone” and “Stonehenge,” which,
however, under the enthusiastic pen of the Rev. Mr. Macdona, becomes
seventy-five.

Be the number of lives saved by Barry more or less, it is impossible for
a lover of dogs to refrain from offering a tribute of praise to the noble
animal whose life was so beneficently spent, or to withhold generous
sympathy with his grandly tragic and yet most becoming death ; he died
in harness at the ripe old age of fifteen years by the hand of a benighted
traveller to whom he was carrying life and hope, and who, mistaking his
would-be preserver for a wolf, killed him.

It was not until dog shows had been some years established that a
class was made for St. Bernards; this was first done at the show held
March, 1863, in the Ashburnham Hall, Cremome, first and second prizes
being won by dogs with no written pedigree, but both bred by the monks
of St. Bernard; these were the Rev. A. N. Bate’s Monk and Mr. W. H.
Stone’s Monk, bred in this country from two dogs imported from St. Bernard
Hospital when puppies. Shortly after this the Rev. J.. Cumming Mac-
dona, whose importation of Tell was the foundation of the grandest
team of St. Bernards that has existed in this country, with the exception﻿The St. Bernard.

251

of the present Shefford Kennels, gave a considerable impetns to the St.
Bernard fancy, and to that gentleman, above all others, I believe the St.
Bernard owes its great popularity to-day, for his lavish expenditure of
time, money, and Bkill in importing and breeding did more than anything
else to establish the breed in public favour. In fact it only wanted good
specimens of these magnificent and colossal dogs to be shown to an
appreciative British publio to secure them a lasting home here, and this
Mr. Macdona did both in his imported specimens and those bred by
himself, and I can assure those who read this that it was a very grand
sight to see six or eight of those noble animals scampering over the sands
and breasting the waves round Hilbre Island like some gigantic sea dogs.
Of other importers of good dogs I must specially mention Mr. J. H. Mur-
chison, who brought Thor into this country, a dog the sire of more present
winners than any other. He has proved a great boon to breeders. Among
those of his get I may mention the Rev. G. A. Sneyd’s Hector, Mr. F.
Gresham’s Shah and Dagmar, Mr. M'Killop’s Simplon, Mr. Armitage’s
Oscar, Mr. Du Maurier’s Chang—all of the very first rank. Thor and
also Miss Hales’s Jura and many other good ones brought over here
were bred byM. Schumacher, of Berne, whose name is most prominent in
England as a Continental breeder.

It is almost needless to observe that there are two varieties recognised,
the rotfgh and the smooth-coated, but these are so closely allied, and
differing in no other point, that rough and smooth whelps may appear in
the same litter, a notable example of which was Mr. Gresham’s champion
smooth-coated dog The Shah and his late rough-coated bitoh Dagmar,
by Thor, out of Abbess.

The general appearance of the St. Bernard is very pleasing, which effect
is no doubt enhanced by his picturesque markings, for although I think
colour is too often overrated in summing up the aggregate points of a
dog, its effect on our first impressions is telling; but, independent of
colour and markings, the dog’s colossal size and symmetrical shape, to-
gether with his fine intelligent head, gives him a commanding and majestic
appearance. The most common faults are, aB in the mastiff, slackness of
loin, not being well coupled, as he should be, with strong sinews con-
necting the ribs and hind quarters, and a tendenoy to cow-hooks, which
gives an awkward gait. Mr. Macdona, in Webb’s book, says: “The
gait or carriage of the dog much resembles the maroh of the lion, ’ ’ an﻿252

British Dogs.

opinion which I cannot from my own observation controvert, all the lions
I have seen being prevented from marching in anything like a dignified
fashion by the limits of their cages, bnt judging from the construction of
the two animals, I am inclined to think the reverend gentleman drew on
his “inner consciousness” for the illustration, and that the king of
brutes does not march with anything like the noble bearing I lately saw
displayed by eight of the pick of the Shefford Kennels as they filed along
a Bedfordshire-lane for my delectation.

In judging St. Bernards, I think symmetry, which is essential to good
action and endurance, of the first consideration, and to which size alone
should give way; but the latter point is, in a companion dog, kept for
his commanding appearance, not to be lost sight of ; for a big good one
is better than a little good one, but a slouching gait destroys his preten-
sions to high rank and gives him a vulgar look, for which gigantic size
does not compensate.

In temper the St. Bernard is, as a rule, gentle and manageable, but
this, as in all breeds, depends much on his human masters and on indi-
viduality, but even a naturally bad-tempered dog may be improved by
judicious treatment.

There is one fault to which I have reason to believe they are as a breed
naturally prone—namely, a penchcmt for raw mutton, which they are apt
to indulge in a lawless manner unbecoming dogs living in civilised
society. This taste they do not object to vary by making a meal of “ a
kid of the goats,” and I advise those rearing St. Bernards to keep a
watchful eye, and check with a firm hand the first disposition to meddle
with flocks and herds they see exhibited in their young dogs.

The following points of the St. Bernard, so admirably drawn up by
“ Stonehenge,” I have copied verbatim from his article in his new issue of
“ The Dogs of the British Islands,” for, I think it is most desirable that
a standard should be recognised by which these dogs should be judged,
and the points have nowhere else been described with such complete-
ness and lucidity.

There are a few points only in which I cannot quite conour, and to
which I will refer, although many may consider it presumptuous to differ
from instead of sitting at the feet of the Gamaliel of canine lore.

First, as to the line up the poll. “ Stonehenge,” after describing the
dress and badge of the Benediotine monks, says : “ A dog marked with﻿The St. Bernard.

253

white in the same manner is supposed to be peculiarly consecrated to his
work,” and adds, “There is no rational objection to the valne appor-
tioned to this point.” I, on the other hand, think there is more than one
rational objection to it: First, as he gives ten positive points for this
line up the poll and five more for colour, distributed as he describes it,
a self-coloured dog like Mr. Du Maurier’s magnificent dog Chang or Dr.
EusBell’s grand young bitch Muren would be debited with fifteen
negative points, or a difference of thirty points less than one marked
after this arbitrary fashion, and to my mind this is eminently unjust.
On this rule Meuthon would never have won a prize, and in that case the
rule would have done good, but by it Chang, Muren, and many other
good ones would be debarred from winning.

The second objection I have to it, and which I hope readers will not
consider an irrational one, is that to my mind it is an anachronism to in-
troduce a monkish superstition as a factor in the practical work of
dog judging in the present day. I remember seeing Mr. Samuel Lang
and Mr. William Lort engaged for about two hours in judging a large
olass of costermongers’ donkeys, but 1 have no recollection that they
were influenced by or even looked for that cross on the back which surely
as “peculiarly consecrates” an ass as the fancied resemblance of a
mark of white to the badge of a Benedictine monk does a St. Bernard
dog.

I also wish to reoord my strong objection to dew claws being
considered a necessary or advantageous adjunct; they are just the
opposite, and, in addition, are as ugly as a wart or any other
“accidental monstrosity,” as Darwin designates dew claws. Those
who contend that dew daws prevent the dog sinking in the snow must
be profoundly ignorant on the matter; they can never have travelled
through a heavy snowfall, for they might as well expect the point of a
walking Btick to prevent them sinking in a snow wreath as a dew claw,
double or treble, to support a St. Bernard under like circumstances.
All dew claws should be out off; they give a clumsy appearance, and
the leg would look oleaner and better shaped without them. That
the large foot fits the animal for snow travelling is clear enough,
but the dew claw, which is loose, and easily doubles up, is useless as a
support.

“The head is large and massive, but is without the width of the﻿254

British Dogs.

mastiff. The dimensions are extended ohiefly in height and length, the
occipital protuberance being specially marked, and, coupled with the
height of brow, serving also to distinguish it from the Newfoundland.
The face is long, and cut off square at the nose, which is intermediate in
width between those of the Newfoundland and mastiff. Lips pendulous,
approaching in character to the bloodhound type, but much smaller.
Ears of medium size, carried close to the cheeks, and covered with silky
hair. Eyes full in size, but deeply sunk, and showing the haw, which is
often as red as that of the bloodhound.

“ Line of poll. As remarked above, great stress is laid by the monks
on this marking, which is supposed to resemble the white lace bands
round the neck and waist of the gown worn by the Benedictine monks,
the two being connected by a strip carried up tbe back. A dog marked
with white in the same manner is supposed to be peculiarly conseorated
to his work, and is kept most carefully to it. Hence it is in this country
also regarded as a characteristic of the breed, but it is seldom met with
in anything like a perfect state of development; Monarque being more
perfect in this respect than any dog ever exhibited.

“Shape of body and neck. There is nothing remarkable about the
neck, except that there is generally a certain amount of throatiness, to
which there is no objection. The body ought to be well proportioned,
with a full chest, the girth of which should be double that of the head,
and half the length of the body from nose to tip of tail; the loin should
be full and the hips wide.

“ In size and symmetry this breed should be up to a full standard,
that is to say, equal to the English mastiff. Indeed, excepting in colour,
in the dewclaws, and in the shape of head, the smooth St. Bernard very
closely resembles that dog. He is generally more active in his move-
ments, from having been more worked than his English compeer, who for
generations has been kept on the chain.

“ Legs and feet. Of course, in so large a dog the legs must be straight
and strong, while the feet also must be large, in order to avoid sinking
through the snow. The last point is greatly insisted on by the monks,
who prefer even what would be considered here a splay foot to a small
and compact one.

“Dewclaws. There is no doubt that the double dewclaw on the hind
legs has in some way been introduced into the strain of dogs used at the﻿The St. Bernard.

255

two Alpine monasteries, bnt how it is now impossible to say. Both Tell
and Monarque exhibited this peculiarity, as well as most of the dogs
admitted to be imported from the Hospice. Gessler, however, who
showed every other point of the breed in a very marked degree, had no
dewclaw at all on his hind legs, and his son Alp, though out of Hedwig,
sister to Tell, was equally deficient. It is very doubtful whether this
peculiarity is sufficiently permanent in any strain to be an evidence of
purity or impurity, and consequently its value is only placed at 5, making
the negative deduction 10 when wholly absent.

“ The temperament of the St. Bernard is very similar to that of the
mastiff—that is to say, if suitably managed, the dog is capable of great
control over his actions, whether in the absence or presence of his owner.
When kept on the chain he is, like other dogs, apt to become savage, and
there is almost always an instinctive dislike to tramps and vagabonds.
He is a capital watch and guard, and attaches himself strongly to his
master or mistress.

“The colour of this dog varies greatly. The most common is
red and white, the white being preferred when distributed after the
pattern described above. Fawn and white and brindle and white
oome next, marked in the same way, the brindle being a very rioh
one, with an orange-tawny shade in it, as shown in Tell, and in a
lesser degree by his nephew, Alp. Sometimes the dog is wholly
white, or very nearly so, as in the case of Hospice and Sir C. H.
Isham’s Leo.

“ The coat in’the rough variety is wavy over the body, bushy in the
tail, and feathering the legs, being generally silky, but sparsely so, on the
ears. In the smooth variety the depth and thickness of the coat are the
points to be regarded.”

Believing the weights, measurements, and other particulars of well-
known dogs would interest readers, I give the following of a few of thoae
whose owners have kindly obliged me.

The particulars given of the Rev. J. Cumming-Maodona’s grand
old dog Tell—now dead many years—I have oopied from “Stonehenge’s”
first edition of the “Dogs of the British Islands,” thinking it might be
interesting to be able to compare at a glance the dimensions of Borne of
cur dogs of the day with those of the dead champion.

Mr. Armitage’s Osoar is in colour a rioh orange tawny and white with﻿256

British Dogs.

white legs and feet, white collar and chest, white blaze up the face and
black ears and muzzle ; he has one single and one double dew claw. Oscar
was bred by Miss Hales, Hales Place, Canterbury, and is by Thor—Jura,
both imported by Mr. J. H. Murchison, and both well-known winners.
Oscar I have always considered a marvellously handsome specimen of the
breed, in confirmation of which I may quote from my critique on the Man-
chester Show, held at Belle Yue, December, 1874, and which appeared in
The Country, 31st Dec., 1874 : “ Of all the non-sporting classes at Belle
Yue we are disposed to think the St. Bernards the best. The first prize
went to Mr. A. C. Armitage’s Oscar, who is only 15 months old. He is
really a magnificent specimen of the breed, and will draw attention to
Thor as a sire. This pup has the most superb head we have seen, and
will develop into a very grand dog if well seen to ; he is not. yet filled
up, and in the opinion of some is hollow backed, and will always be slack
in loin, but with these opinions we do not coincide .... still, he should
not here have been placed over Mr. F. Gresham’s Monk, with whom in
no other point than head can he at present compare.” Oscar has borne out
my good opinion of him as a pup, and has since won at the Crystal Palace.
He is an exceedingly good tempered and excellent companion and guard.
Dr. Bussell’s bitch Muren was, I consider, a wonder at her age, while yet
but a pup; Bhe has single dew claws, is in colour a light orange, with
white points and partial white collar. Her colour is considered by some to
be quite a damning fault, an opinion, I think, utterly untenable, unless we
are to reduce St. Bernards to the level of toys, and ignore their magnificent
history and the noble life of derring-do to which he has been trained, and for
which nature and the education and example of good men have fitted
him.

Mr. Sydney W. Smith’s Barry is a remarkably fine specimen of an
imported dog, bred by Mr. G. Ficher, of Fribourg, Switzerland. He was
brought to England in 1876, when about twelve months old, and took
first prize at Darlington Show, in a good class, immediately after his
arrival, and he now ranks as one of the finest specimens we have. In
colour he is orange tawny with white points, white chest, white blaze up
the face, and white star on the neck. He is blessed with those “ mon-
strosities,” dew claws, considered so essential by the class of fanciers
who attach more weight to the number of hairs on the mole on a pug’s
cheek than to the more important parts of his anatomy.﻿The St. Bernard.

257

WEIGHTS AND MEASUREMENTS OP WELL-KNOWN
ST. BEBNABDS:—

Name of Dog and Owner.	Age.	Weight.	Height at Shoulder.	Length from Nose to set on of Tail.	Length of Tail.	Girth of CheBt.	Girth of Loin.	Girth of Head.	Girth of Forearm.	Length of Head from occiput to tip of nose.	Girth of Muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose.
Mr. Arthur C. Armi-1 tape’s “Oscar" j Dr. Bussell’s	\  “Mentor”	J  Mr. G. B. Tetley's 1 (late Mr. W. Yuile’s) > “Simplon”	J  Mr. Sydney W.	1  Smith’s “Barry" J Dr. Bussell’s bitch 1 “ Muren ”	J  Rev. J. C. Macdona’s 1 “Tell” (dead) J	4 years 8 months 6 years  4 years 3 years l4months	lb.  151  135  170  159  130  147	in.  32  29  32*  32*  29  30*	in.  50  56  61  56  53  8	in.  25  23  21  24	in.  38  35*  40  43  37  36	in.  31  29  35*  31	in.  27  26  28*  23  22	in.  11  11  14  13*  101  13	in.  13  12  12  Hi  13	in.  15  14  15g  12*

Mr. Stanhope Inglis’s Brv/no : Age, 4 years ; height at shonlder, 30in.;
length from nose to set on of tail, 51in. ; length of tail, 22£in. ; girth of
chest, 38|in.; girth of loin, 33in.; girth of head, 25|in. ; girth of fore-
arm, 12in.; length of head from occipnt to tip of nose, 12£in.; girth of
muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 13in.; colour, orange
tawny and white.

Mr. L. H. Layland’s Leo: Age, 2 years and 5 months; weight,
1401b.; height at shonlder, 29in. ; length from nose to set on of
tail, 52iin.; length of tail, 25in. ; girth of chest, 38in.; girth of loin,
32in.; girth of head, 25in.; girth of forearm, ll^in. ; length of head
from oocipnt to tip of nose, 12Jin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes
and tip of nose, 15in.

Mr. J. C. Tinker’s Gresham: Age, 10fc months ; height at shonlder,
31in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 61in.; length of tail, 24in.;
girth of chest, 40in.; girth of loin, 35in. ; girth of head, 25in.; length
of head from occipnt to tip of nose, 12£in.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 15£in.; entire length, 85in.

Mr. J. C. Tinker’s bitch Mob : Age, 3 years and 8 months; weight
about 1281b.; height at shonlder, 29£in.; length from nose to set on of
tail, 53fin. ; length of tail, 26in.; girth of ohest, 37£in. ; girth of loin,
29}in.; girth of head, 25in. ; girth of forearm, lOin.; length of head

S﻿258

British Dogs.

from occiput to tip of nose, lOfin. ; girth of muzzle midway between
eyes and tip of nose, 14fin.

Prince Albert Solms’ rough-coated dog Courage: Age, 4 years;
weight, lArslb.; height at shoulder, 30£in.; length from nose to set on
of tail, 51in.; length of tail, 25in.; girth of chest, 36£in.; girth of loin,
31£in. ; girth of head, 25in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
13in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 14£in.

Mr. William Valentine’s smooth-coated Bernard-. Age, 5 years;
weight, 1201b.; height at shoulder, 30in.; length from nose to set
on of tail, 52in.; length of tail, 23in. ; girth of chest, 35in.; girth
of loin, 29in.; girth of head, 27in. ; girth of forearm, llin. ; length
of head from occiput to tip of nose, 12in. ; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 14in.

Mr. W. Hart-Chamberlain’s Mariigwg: Age, 2 years 7 months;
weight, 1391b. ; height at shoulder, 30in.; length from nose to set on
of tail, 56in. ; length of tail, 23in.; girth of ohest, 37£in .; girth of loin,
3<Hin.; girth of head, 23£in.; girth of forearm, lOfin. ; length of head
from occiput to tip of nose, 12fin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes
and tip of nose, 13in.

Mr. T. C. Emmerson’s Bolckow : Age, 3 years ; weight, 1401b.; height,
at shoulder, 30£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 52in.; length of tail,
23in.; girth of chest, 40in.; girth of loin, 29in. ; girth of head, 23|in.;
girth of arm lin. above elbow, 12in.; girth of leg lin. below elbow, lOin.;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 12in.; girth of muzzle
midway between eyes and tip of nose, 13in. ; colour and markings,
orange tawny, black muzzle, white breast and feet.

Mr. Charles Goas’s Mcurco : Age, 22 months ; weight, 1551b.; height
at shoulder, 33in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 57fin.; length
of tail, 24in. ; girth of chest, 42£in. ; girth of loin, 37in. ; girth of
head, 26in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 12£in.; girth of leg lin.
below elbow, Ilf in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 12fin.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 15in.; colour and
markings, self-coloured orange.

Dr. Bussell’s Cadwallader (never shown): Age, 2 years; weight,
1561b.; height at shoulder, 31in.; length from nose to set on of tail,
63in.; length of tail, 24in.; girth of chest, 39in.; girth of loin, 32in.;
girth of head, 26£in. ; girth of forearm, 13in.; length of head from﻿The St. Bernard.

259

occiput to tip of nose, 12in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 15£in.; length of muzzle, 4£in.

Mr. W. J. Sherringham’s bitch, Snowdrop : Age, 12 months; weight,
1091b. ; height at shoulder, 29in.; length from nose to set on of tail,
48in.; length of tail, 21in. ; girth of chest, 37in.; girth of loin, 31in.;
girth of head, 20in. ; girth of forearm, lOin. ; length of head from
occiput to tip of nose, 10£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 12Jin.

The following measurements of puppies will also prove valuable to
breeders for comparison :

Mr. S. H. Fox’s Bella, by Moltke—Snowdon : Age, 5 months and
27 days; weight, 821b. ; height at shoulder, 26£in. ; length from nose to
set on of tail, 48£in.; length of tail, 20£in. ; girth of chest, 32£in. ;
girth of loin, 27in.; girth of head, 21in.; girth of forearm, 9in. ; length
of head from occiput to tip of nose, lOin.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, llfin.

The Rev. Grenville F. Hodson’s Haco : Age, 7 months; height at
shoulder, 27in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 46£in. ; length of
tail, 21in.; girth of chest, 34in.; girth of loin, 27in.; girth of head,
21in.; girth of forearm, 9£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 11 Jin.

Mr. G. Watmough Webster’s pup, by Moltke—Norma: Age, 6 months ;
weight, 901b.; height at shoulder, 25£in.; length from nose to end of
tail, 69in.; girth of chest, 35in.; girth of loin, 30in. ; girth of head,
22£in.; girth of forearm, 10£in.﻿26o

British Dogs.

Chapter X.—THE NEWFOUNDLAND.

By Corsincon.

Whenever I sit down to write about any breed of dog I feel disposed
to dasb off witb “ Of all varieties of the dog none has created so much
public interest, given rise to such wide and protracted disonssion, and
brought out such variety and divergence of opinion respecting it as the
one under consideration.” But a moment’s reflection shows me that if I
use such words at all, I ought to have them stereotyped as applicable to
nearly all* and every breed.

The Newfoundland has undoubtedly had its full share of public atten-
tion, and long before dog shows were in existence, or the finely drawn dis-
tinctions respecting “ points ” called into being, he reigned paramount in
the affections of the British public as a companion, ornament, and guard.

But in those days, as I have said, every man had his own ideal standard
of excellence, or borrowed a suitable one from a doggy friend, the suita-
bility being ensured by alteration sufficient to make it applicable to his
own pet, a process not yet entirely obsolete.

Many of these large so-called Newfoundland dogs of twenty-five
to forty years ago had, undoubtedly, like the “Csesar”that Bums
immortalised in his poem of “ The Twa Dogs,” been

whalpit some gate far abroad,

Whore sailors gang toe fish for cod,

or were the immediate descendants of such, but they differed materially
in colour, coat and in other minor points from each other, and still more
from what is now held to be the Newfoundland proper, as he is bred
and exhibited in this country.

I can speak personally to the decided difference between dogs im-
ported from Newfoundland into Liverpool some twenty-five and thirty
years ago, each believed to be the pure breed of the island by their
owners ; that difference, as it exists in a memory naturally tenacious of
such things, was more in the sort of coat and the colour than in the other
marked characteristics of the breed which they all had in common with
the recognised dog of the day.

The marked difference then existing in this country was also common﻿﻿﻿The Newfoundland.

261

in the island of Newfoundland, and I understand on good authority con-
tinues, and this obscures the interesting question, What Was the
original breed of the island really like P and prepares us for the very wide
difference and rather dogmatic expression of opinion on the subject by
gentlemen who have had the advantage of a residence there, and who have
afterwards joined in public discussion on the question.

I remember some years ago, after the pleasures and fatigue of a
Wolverhampton Show, spending a most enjoyable evening with that
eminent and excellent judge Mr. William Lort, a friend, and a church-
warden (one of Sothem’s Broseleys), when the former gentleman, who is
by no means a “talking machine,” for once, opening the gateways of
his memory, gave us reminiscences 6f his Newfoundland life, so graphic
and brilliant in their delineations, as to hold us spellbound. Of course
the dogs were not forgotten, and I believe I am repeating in effect his
views that, although a variety of big mongrels were kept and used there,
those that the natives of the island looked on as the true breed were the
black or rusty black, with thick and shaggy coats, and corresponding
in all other points, although, from want of proper culture, inferior to
our best specimens of the day.

Against this testimony I will quote a few other opinions. “Index,”
who in the “Field,” about nine years ago, wrote on this subject with
great pertinence, and evidently from personal observation, declared the
true breed to be of “an intenseblaokcolour,” and “witha small streak of
white, which is upon the breast of ninety-nine out of every hundred
genuine dogs.”

Per contra “ Otterstone,” in the “Country,” 6th January, 1876, says :
“ The predominant oolour of the ‘ Newfoundland proper ’ is white. His
marks are nearly invariable, namely, a blaok head or face mark, a black
saddle mark, and the tip of the stem also blaok.” “ Otterstone ” also
wrote from personal observation, I believe, of the dogs accepted as pure
Newfoundlands in Canada, and I might go on quoting from others, not
only about oolour, but texture of ooat, some holding it should be ourly,
others wavy, others shaggy, and the height of the original is variously
stated as 24in. to 26in., up to 30in. to 32in.

This, however, would only, I think, oooupy unnecessary space. I
cannot, however, forego the pleasure of quotations from the “ Sports-
man’s Cabinet,” published 1802, which I feel sure cannot fail to interest﻿262

British Dogs.

readers who have not perused that now comparatively scarce book. The
engraving of the Newfoundland therein given is from a drawing by
Eenaigle and engraved by J. Scott, and represents a dog like our modern
one in most points, but not so big and square in head, and altogether
lighter in build, and almost entirely white. It is to be regretted that
the author of the accompanying letter-press did not give a minute
description, which he was thoroughly competent to do. Here, however,
is what he does say : “ The dog passing under this description is so
universally known in every part of the kingdom, and is so accurately
delineated by the united efforts of the artists in the representation
annexed, that a minute description of its size, shape, make, and form
may be considered unnecessary. . . . He is one of the most majestic
of all the canine variety. Although at first sight he appears terrific from
the immensity of his magnitude, the placid serenity of his countenance
as instantly dispels the agitating vibrations of fear.” The words of
such an authority should be given due weight in considering what is
and what is not a true Newfoundland. Whether there was a dog of
marked characteristics from other recognised breeds found indigenous to
the island on its discovery or not, we may accept the case as proved
that they are now from various causes a mixed lot, as inferior to our
English Newfoundlands as their Eastern progenitors are to our thorough-
bred horse. There is, however, a very general agreement that as regards
size we have imported two varieties—the one the Newfoundland as now
recognised, the other the lesser Newfoundland, or Labrador dog, on
which our wavy-coated retrievers are founded; and it is of the former
we are now treating.

The contention of those who say the original breed did not stand more
than about 25in. at the shoulder is greatly discounted by references to
the size and dignified appearance of the dog by older writers; and
although climate and good care do much, I cannot think their effects
would be so immediate and so great as to make a 30in. dog out of a pup
which, left at home, would only have grown to 25in., or that that result
would follow except after a considerable number of years of careful
breeding; but we have seen that by the extract from the “ Sportsman’s
Cabinet,” nearly seventy years before ‘‘ Index ” wrote in the “ Field,”
and his dictum as to height was accepted by “ Stonehenge,” the dog was
valued for his great size.﻿The Newfoundland.

263

There is certainly a dignity of demeanour, a noble bearing, and a
sense of strength and power, though softened by the serenity of his
countenance and deeply sagacious look which cannot be disassociated
from great size, and no better illustration of this could be found than
Mr. Howard Mapplebeck’s Leo, and these were among the good qualities
which have always commended him to public favour. The Newfoundland’s
good qualities, however, do not rest here ; he is of a strongly emulative
disposition, extremely sensitive to praise or censure, and should therefore,
especially when young, be managed with great care and circumspection ;
he is never so well satisfied as when employed either for the pleasure or
advantage of his master, and his strong propensity to fetch and carry
develops itself naturally at an early age. Qne that I trained when a boy,
and that afterwards became famous in the Postmaster General’s service
(although not on the pay list), by carrying the letter bags between a village
office and the Carlisle and Glasgow Mail Coach, when quite a puppy
would bring a small log from the woodhouse for the kitchen fire at the
word of command, and indeed often without, for I have seen him, for his
own amusement, bring quite a pile of them in, which he would take baok
one by one when told.

As a water dog he has no equal—he delights in it, will almost live in
it—and his high courage and great swimming powers enable him to face,
and do service in such a sea as I believe no other land animal can success-
fully encounter.

Knowing and admiring the wonderful faculty he possesses, suggested
to me, when viewing the sea from the site of Portsmouth Dog Show in
1875, the advisability of instituting water trials as a means of keeping
up and developing this wonderful and useful natural power, that his
great abilities as a life-saver might be made the best of for the
benefit of man, for it cannot be denied that without such aids public or
private dog shows may do serious harm, giving, as they properly do,
prominence to the finest developed animal. But if prize winners, how-
ever grand in appearance, are uneducated, their instincts and natural
powers undeveloped and indeed oheoked, are continuously bred from,
we shall soon have lost sterling qualities and get, in return, mere good
looks.

But the two things—fine physical development, with high cultivation
of those instinctB, and natural powers—are not incompatible, and should,﻿264

British Dogs.

I think, be simultaneously enoouraged by dog show promoters, just as
the Kennel Club does for pointers and setters by their field trials.

Chiefly at my instigation, water trials of Newfoundlands took place at
Maidstone Show, May, 1876, and were repeated at Portsmouth later in
the same year, and, although neither could be pronounced as a brilliant
success, they were each of them in many respects interesting, and proved
that with more experience, and well carried out, such competitive trials
might become more than interesting—highly useful.

I would be the last to advocate again reducing this or any breed to a
beast of burden, but I cannot but think and here repeat what I have so
often written, that the Newfoundland’s extraordinary natural power as a
water dog, his wonderful sagacity and intense desire to serve should be
systematically developed and utilised, and I can see no reason why one
or more trained dogs should not be attached to every lifeboat station
and at every popular bathing resort around our coasts.

I must here render praise to Mr. C. Marshall for the excellent rules he
drew up for the conduct of the first public water trial of dogs. As a
basis for others who may wish to institute similar competitions, I append
the tests adopted at Maidstone.

Tests for Water Dogs.

1st. Courage displayed in jumping into the water from a height to
recover an object. The effigy of a man is the most suitable thing.

2nd. The quickness displayed in bringing the object ashore.

3rd. Intelligence and speed in bringing a boat to shore—the boat must
of course, be adrift, and the painter have a piece of white wood attached
to keep it afloat, mark its position, and facilitate the dog’s work.

4th. To carry a rope from shore to a boat with a stranger, not the
master, in it.

5th. Swimming races, to show speed and power against stream or tide.

6th. Diving. A common flag basket, with a stone in the bottom of it
to sink it, answers well, as it is white enough to be seen and soft enough
to the dog’s mouth.

In regard to the points of this dog I adopt without alteration those of
“ Stonehenge,” because of their excellence, and also because I think,
although one may differ in minor points, it is most undesirable to set up
or attempt to set up a variety of standards scarcely differing from each
other except in the language in which they are set forth. I therefore give﻿The Newfoundland.

265

the following verbatim, adding a few comments for the acceptance or
not of readers, as they think fit.

“ The head is very broad, and nearly flat on the top in each direc-
tion, exhibiting a well-marked occipital protuberance, and also a con-
siderable brow over the eye, often rising three-quarters of an inch from
the line of the nose, as is well shown in the case of my present illustra-
tion, Mr. Mapplebeck’s Leo, in which it exists to a greater extent than
usual. The Labrador shows the brow also, but not nearly in so marked
a manner. There is a slight furrow down the middle of the top of the
head, but nothing approaching to a stop. The skin on the forehead is
slightly wrinkled, and the coat on the face and top of the head is short,
but not so much so as in the curly retriever. Nose wide in all directions,
but of average length, and moderately square at the end, with open
nostrils ; the whole of the jaws covered with short hair.

“ Eyes and ears. The eyes of this dog are small, and rather deeply
set; but there should be no display of the haw or third eyelid. They
are generally brown, of various shades, but light rather than dark. The
ears are small, clothed with short hair on all but the edges, which are
fringed with longer hair.

“ The neck is often short, making the dog look chumpy and inelegant*
This defect should always be attended to, and a dog with a sufficiently
lengthy neck should have the full allowance ; but, on the other hand, a
short chumpy one is so often met with that, even if present, the possessor
of it should not be penalised with negative points. The throat is clean,
without any development of frill, though thickly clothed with hair.

"The chest is capacious, and rather round than flat; back ribs
generally Bhort.

“The back is often slack and weak, but in some specimens, and
notably in Leo, there is a fine development of muscle ; accompanying
this weak back there is often a rolling and weak walk.

“ The legs should be very bony and straight, well clothed with
musole on the arms and lower thighs. Elbows well let down, and neither
in nor out. Both the fore and hind legs are thiokly feathered, but not to
any great length. There is also often a double dew claw.

“ The feet are large and wide, with thin soles. The toes are generally
flat, and consequently this dog soon becomes foot-sore in road work,
and cannot accompany a horse or carriage at a fast paoe.﻿266

British Dogs.

“In size the Newfoundland should be at least 25in. in height, and if
he is beyond this it is a merit rather than a defect, as explained in the
above remarks. Many very fine and purely-bred specimens reared in this
country have been from 30in. to 32in. high.

‘ ‘ The symmetry of this dog is often defective, owing to the tendency
of a short neck and weak loin. As a consequence, a symmetrical dog like
Leo is highly to be approved of.

“ The colour should be black, the richer the better ; but a rusty
stain in it is so common in the native breed that it should by no
means be penalised. Still the jet black is so handsome in comparison
with it that I think, other points being equal, it should count above the
rusty stain in judging two dogs. A white star on the breast is often met
with. The white and black colour exhibited in the Landseer type never
occurs in the true Newfoundland.

“ The coat of the Newfoundland is shaggy, without much under-
coat, and at first sight it would appear unfit for much exposure to wet.
It is, however, so thick and oily that it takes some time for the water to
reach the skin through it. There is often a natural parting down the
back, and the surface is very glossy.

‘ ‘ The tail is long and gently curled on one Bide, but not carried
high. It is clothed thickly with long hair, which is quite bushy, but
often naturally parted down the middle.”

I prefer in judging to take general appearance and symmetry first.

It is impossible to dissent from “Stonehenge’s” remarks in regard to
the head, and it will be observed that we have also selected for our
engraving that incomparable dog Mr. Howard Mapplebeck’s Leo. The
illustrations, however, are from the drawings of different artists, viz.,
Mr. Baker and Mr. Moore.

As to the ears, I may here remark on the authority of Meyrick—for I
have not met with the original work—that Justice Haliburton, who was a
connoisseur in the breed, describes this feature as “ a small and delicate
mouse-like ear.”

Haliburton also refers to the dew claws ; it is usual to remove them,
and this should I think be done in all breeds, for they are a useless
incumbrance, and make the leg look clumsy.

Although a 25in. dog may be a pure Newfoundland, one that size
would stand little chance in competition at our large shows.﻿The Newfoundland.

26?

With the conflicting evidence before us, I am not prepared to endorse
the statement that the white and black colonr never occurs in the
true Newfoundland, but this question has been practically settled in the
best possible way by making a distinct class for the picturesque black
and white under the name of Landseer Newfoundland.

Mr. Howard Mapplebeck’s Leo, now Mr. S. W. Wildman’s, is a fine
model of the breed ; he is of great size, most symmetrical in build, with
an elegant carriage ; has a fine broad intellectual looking head, and the
dignified appearance so remarkable in all good specimens of the breed;
and is without doubt the finest living specimen that has been exhibited,
and this is high praise when we consider the number of good ones our
shows have brought out.

Weights and measurements of celebrated dogs :

Mr. T. Worthy’s Help : Age, 2f years ; weight, 1541b.; height at
shoulder, 30in. ; length of nose to set on of tail, 51in.; length of
tail, 25in.; girth of ohest, 41in.; girth of loin, 31in. ; girth of head, 24in.;
girth of forearm, 12in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 12in.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 12£in .

Mrs. Cunliffe Lee’s Nep: Age, 5 years ; height at shoulder, 31in.;
length from nose to set on of tail, 48in.; length of tail, 16in.; girth of
chest, 36in. ; girth of loin, 32in. ; girth of head, 21in.; girth of fore
arm, lOfin.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9in.; girth of
muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 12in.

Mr. S. W. Wildman’s champion Qipsy : Age, 3 years ; weight, 981b.;
height at shoulder, 28in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 42in.;
length of tail, 18in.; girth of chest, 35in.; girth of loin, 30in.; girth of
head, 21£in.; girth of forearm, lOfin. ; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, llfin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 12in.

Mr. S. W. Wildman’s champion Brunette: Age, 4 years ; weight,
1041b.; height at shoulder, 29in. ; length from nose to set on of tail,
43iin.; length of tail, 18£in. ; girth of ohest, 36in.; girth of loin, 33in. ;
girth of head, 22in. ; girth of forearm, llin. ; length of head from
occiput to tip of nose, Ilf in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of noBe, 12in.

Mr. S. W. Wildman’s Lady in Black : Age, 4 years ; weight, 1061b. ;
height at shoulder, 28fin. ; length of nose to set on of tail, 44in.; length﻿268

British Dogs.

of tail, 18Jin.; girth of chest, 36in. ; girth of loin, 31in. ; girth of head,
22in.; girth of forearm, 10 Jin.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
llin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 12in.

Mr. S. W. Wildman’s Flora, dam of Gipsy: Age, 7 years; weight, 89 Jib.;
height at shoulder, 28in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 42in.; length
of tail, 18in.; girth of chest, 35in.; girth of loin, 29in. ; girth of head,
21in. : girth of forearm, lOin.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
lljin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose 12Jin.

Mr. S. W. Wildman’s champion Leo : Age, 6 years; weight, 1351b.;
height at shoulder, 31Jin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 50in.;
length of tail, 20in.; girth of chest, 38in. ; girth of loin, 34in.; girth
of head, 22in.; girth of forearm, 9in.; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, llin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 12in.

Mr. S. W. Wildman’s champion Lion : Age, 2J years; weight, 1291b. ;
height at shoulder, 29 Jin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 52in. ;
length of tail, 20Jin.; girth of chest, 39in.; girth of loin, 32in.; girth
of head, 24in. ; girth of forearm, 10 Jin. ; length of head from occiput
to tip of nose, 12 Jin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 13in.

Mr. S. W. Wildman’s Mayor of Bingley : Age 2 years 4 months;
weight, 1421b. ; height at shoulder, 32J-in.; length from nose to set on
of tail, 50in.; length of tail, 21in.; girth of chest, 41 Jin.; girth of
loin, 33in.; girth of head, 24Jin.; girth of forearm, llin.; length of head
from occiput to tip of nose, 12fin.; girth of muzzle midway between
eyes and tip of nose, 13in.

Mr. S. W. Wildman’s Black Prince : Age, 2j years; weight, 1331b. ;
height at shoulder, 31in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 51in.;
length of tail, 20in. ; girth of chest, 39jin. ; girth of loin, 34in. ;
girth of head, 23Jin.; girth of forearm, 10 Jin. ; length of head from
occiput to tip of nose, 13in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 12Jin.﻿The Landseer Newfoundland.

269

Chapter XI.—THE	LANDSEER

NEWFOUNDLAND.

By Corsincon.

Teat great artist, Sir Edwin Landseer, having immortalised a black and
white dog, of Newfoundland type, in his painting, “A Distinguished
Member of the Humane Society,” made this variety too popular to be
ignored by fashion, which is most arbitrary in such cases, and had
determined that all blaok should be the colour of Newfoundland dogs.

Fashion, therefore, finding itself opposed by genius which was popular,
very wisely entered into a compromise by setting up two classes of New-
foundlands, and in honour of genius calling the black and white sort the
Landseer Newfoundland.

Although I think it is doubtful whether the blaok has a claim to the
exclusive title given him, I cannot but agree that we are happy in having
suoh an excellent reason for christening the bi-colour dog the Landseer,
and there is every reason to increase the number of classes, if by so
doing we can increase the number of good dogs kept, and diminish the
number of mongrels. Since a class was established for Landseers the
numbers exhibited have increased.

The Landseer differs but little from the black except in colour, and a
tendency in the coat to curl. Some specimens are very curly, and I do
not know that that is a fault. It should perhaps rather be made a
point of difference between them and the black.

Mr. Lord’s Moldau, however, has a straight dense coat, and this German
bred dog, so perfect in symmetry, should be most valuable as a sire. He
has not so much white on him as is generally desired in a Landseer where
the white and black are liked best in about equal proportions, but a dog
of his beautiful formation, and with his white points, should with lightish
coloured bitches get grand Btock. Moldau I gave second prize to at the
International Show, Hanover, 1879, in the best class I have ever seen.

Mr. Evans’ Dick has proved the greatest prize winner of this variety,
he is a noble specimen and as clever as he is handsome, and from personal
knowledge of him I can add perfect as a companion dog.﻿270

British Dogs.

The points by which the class should be judged are the same as in the
black, with the exception of coat and colour.

Weights and measurements of Landseer Newfoundlands :—

Mr. R. Evans’s Dick: Age, 7 years; weight, 1391b.; height at
shoulder, 30in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 4ft. 3in.; length
of tail, 2Hin. ; girth of chest, 40in; girth of loin, 32in.; girth of head,
24iin.; girth of forearm, 10jin.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, llin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 12£in.

Mr. Walter J. Sherringham’s bitch Lill: Age, 21 months ; weight,
1121bs.; height at shoulder, 28£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail,
56in.; length of tail, 22in.; girth of chest, 35in. ; girth of loin, 30in. ;
girth of head, 21in.; girth of forearm, lOin.; length of head from occiput
to tip of nose, ll^in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 12in.

Mr. W. H. Harper’s Bruno : Age, 3 years ; weight, 1641b.; height
at shoulder, 30in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 49in. ; length of
tail, 21in.; girth of ohest, 41in.; girth of loin, 35in. ; girth of head,
23£in.; girth of forearm, 12in.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, ll^in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
12£in.

Chapter XII.—THE DALMATIAN.

By Corsincon.

The origin of the Dalmatian is quite as obscure as that of any other
breed. When naturalists indulged in flights of fancy on such subjects
this peculiarly spotted dog was said to be the offspring of an alliance
between a dog and a tiger; he has been called a pointer, the Bengal
harrier, the Danish dog, and likened to a bull terrier. There appears,
however, to be no valid reason to reject the origin suggested by his name,
and, with no arguments against it that bear investigation, and sugges-
tions to the contrary appearing to be mere fancies unsupported by proof,
1 think it reasonable to assume that he is a native of Dalmatia, on the
eastern shores of the Gulf of Venice. Of course, the idea at one time
seriously put forward, that our spotted carriage dog was the result of a﻿5?

S'

L *

£ 9

&

I.

I

£

&

!?

3

3

n

in

b

i?﻿﻿The Dalmatian.

271

cross between a dog and a tiger, would now be langhed at by any school-
boy, who might, indeed, suggest the leopard as the more likely animal to
produce a spotted dog. I do not know on what authority Youatt called
him the great Danish dog, a variety naturalists have described as much
larger and, in many respects, different from our carriage dog, and his
claim to be a Bengalese harrier seems to rest on the single fact that a
spotted dog resembling our modern Dalmatian was once brought from
Bengal to Spain. That he originally came from Dalmatia his name indi-
cates, and this view seems strengthened by the recorded fact that for two
centuries and a half he has been one of the domesticated dogs of Italy, a
country so near to his reputed native home that we can easily imagine his
being familiarised there long before he reached this dog-loving isle. When
the Dalmatian first became known in England I have been unable to dis-
cover. He was a favourite with the wealthy in the last century, and
oontinued to be considered an absolutely indispensable appendage to the
elaborately magnificent equipage and stable establishments of the great,
to which his highly ornamental appearance added splendour, and his
natural habits and love for the horse so well fitted him.

Bewick gives an engraving of one so perfect in the clearly defined and
perfectly arranged spots that I have not the least doubt art improved on
Nature, just as Mr. Baker in “ Dogs of the British Islands ” has made
Captain’s spots so very much more distinct with his penoil than Dame
Nature has with hers.

Either of these engravings might, however, be taken as a model to
breed up to as regards colour and spots, but neither is so correct in that
respect as Mr. Moore has been in depicting Spotted Dick, the subject
of our engraving, although the body colour is too dark, not doing the dog
justice there, but the spots are given as they actually are.

It has been assumed that the Dalmatian possesses an instinctive
fondness for the horse, but this I do not oonoeive was the cause of his being
attached to the carriage and stable; but I rather suppose his ornamental
qualities were the attractions to owners of equipages, and that his liking
for horses and all connected with them has been fostered by habit and is
now inherited.

‘ ‘ Idstone ’ ’ says he never knew a dog of the breed that did not readily
take to following horse and conveyance, but my experience has been
different, and I possess one now of prize blood that shows no propensity﻿272

British Dogs.

to following a carriage, although reared among horses. Still, that is a
predominating trait in their character, and, in fact, in that seems to con-
sist their sole delight, and, no matter at what hour, they are always ready
for the turn out, and do not seem to care how far the run may be.

Some Dalmatians keep close under the carriage in running, so much so
that they appear to run as though chained to the axle, but others, indeed
the most of them, when fresh and full of life, gallop in front, showing
much dignity as the forerunner of the carriage, and pleasure in association
with it. At other times they run marvellously close to the horse’s heels,
but they never snap at them or jump up barking at them in front of
their nose as dogs of other breeds are apt to do under similar circum-
stances.

As already said, in the early part of the century the carriage dog was
more generally kept than he is now as a part of the stable establishment,
and then, and indeed until almost recent years, his ears were cropped
short, often to a level with the head. Many readers will reoolleot dogs
that had been subjected to this barbarous custom, and I am glad to say
it no longer prevails ; indeed, terrier fanciers are the only class who now
indulge such a vitiated taste, and it is to be hoped they will soon, from
shame at being so far behind their neighbours, if from no higher motive,
give up a custom for which it is impossible to find any better justification
than the wish to indulge a vulgar fancy. There are, I think, evidences
that this very handsome appendage to the carriage is slowly but, I hope,
surely regaining his popularity. It is true they have never been a large
class at our shows, but I certainly know more good specimens at the
present time than I have done for years, and I have known every prize
winner since the commencement of shows.

The Messrs. Hale, of Brierley Hill and Burton-on-Trent, were prin-
cipal winners at early shows, and Mr. Rowland Davies, of Swan Village,
West Bromwich, owned some good ones that won at Birmingham and
London ; and then followed Mr. R. J. LI. Price’s Crib, bred by Mr. Row-
land Hale, that took all before him until in his declining years he had to
give way to Mr. Fawdry’s celebrated Captain—a dog, I think, the best
coloured of any of the breed I have ever seen, but, from what I have
seen of coming dogs, I should think his place is likely to be taken by tho
subject of our woodcut—Dr. James’s Spotted Dick— a dog not so good in
contrast of colour, but superior in formation.﻿The Dalmatian.

273

Dalmatians are unusually plentiful in the charming districts sur-
rounding the Crystal Palace, and fair puppies may often be bought very
cheaply from some of the owners of public carriages, as they are pretty
generally kept about these stables ; good specimens are also often seen
accompanying private carriages in the neighbourhood. I do not
know whether Dalmatians show the same pleasure in accompanying a
bicyole as a carriage, but I have no doubt that if they did not at onoe
take to the iron steed they could very soon be brought to do so, and the
bioyoling tourist would in this dog have a highly ornamental adjunct to
his travelling equipage, a pleasant companion, and a good guard of his
property.

The Dalmatian has been aocused of an apathetic temper, of concen-
trating all hiB affection on the horse and showing none to his master.
This, is, however, an unjust charge. Dalmatians, like all other dogs,
are very much what they are made, and if the owner forgets that the Dal-
matian is an animal appreciative of caressses and kindness, and treats
him merely as an ornament to his establishment, he cannot reasonably
oomplain if the dog bestows his affections on his fellow-occupant of the
stable, and strong are the friendships sometimes seen to exist between
the dog and the horse. But the carriage dog, when made a companion,
is faithful and affectionate if less demonstrative than some breeds, and
therefore I strongly recommend him to the bicyclist, whilst I should
like to see him regain his popularity as a carriage dog. It is said he is
used in some continental countries as a pointer, and I do not doubt his
innate capacity to fill that position if his powers were developed by
training, but as he is never so used here I treat him merely as an
ornamental and companion dog.

I shall now take the points of the Dalmatian seriatim, and, first of all,
I think, should be considered his fitness for travelling, which so much
depends on hiB strength and symmetry : a heavy, lumbering, unshapely
dog, lumpy in shoulders, bulging at the elbows, and stilty behind, would
be incapable of travelling at horse pace for the time a well-made Dalmatian
can do so with apparent ease and pleasure, and, therefore, capability to
travel with the oarriage being a necessity, no cripple, however beautifully
spotted, should gain a prize, and for strength, build, and symmetry I
should give twenty points in judging.

The head very much resembles that of the pointer, but is neither

T﻿274

British Dogs.

quite so deep nor so broad in muzzle ; the skull tight-skinned, no flews
—indeed, no loose skin about either head or throat; the eyes medium size,
dark in colour, and bright and sparkling ; the ears broad at base, nar-
rowing to a rounded point, thin in texture, and spotted.

The neck should be of fair length, nicely arohed, airy—that is, free
from coarseness—and clean cut, there being little or no wrinkling or
dewlap.

The shoulders must be well sloped and free, and well covered with
muscle, but not thick or loaded.

The body must be elegant, not heavy ; the ribs fairly sprung, but
not rounded like barrel hoops, which would indicate slowness, and
destroy the symmetry; the loin strong and muscular; the quarters
strong, nicely sloping from the huckle bone to set on of tail.

The legs and feet are most important. In the hind legs the second
thigh should be seen and the hock well let down ; the fore legs should be
straight and clean made, lined with strong muscles. The feet are of good
size, of compact shape, rather round than long, knuckles well up, and
the sole thick, hard, and tough. A spreading foot is very objectionable,
rendering the dog unfit for travel.

The tail should be strong at the insertion, and rush grown—
that is, tapering to a point, and carried with a slight curve upwards, but
neither crooked nor curled. If distinctly spotted, it is considered a great
advantage, as adding much to the beauty of the dog.

The coat should be clean and sleek, but firm, close, and wet resisting,
neither woolly nor silky.

The colour and markings give the dog his very distinctive
character, and, therefore, are properly very highly valued. The body
must be a pure white ; single black hairs running through the ground
colour, giving a greyish hue, are a very great fault; the purer and brighter
the white the better the black and liver spots look by contrast; the colour
of the spots should be a pure black, blue black, or rich reddish liver ; the
handsomest are the tricolours, with black Bpots on the body and bright
well-defined liver spots on the back of the forelegs, inside and front of
the thighs, and sometimes under and on the sides of the jaw. Some of
the earlier winners had distinctly tanned faces, but these and black
patches are objectionable, although less so than the dark ridge of con-
glomerated spots that often runs down the back. The more distinct﻿The Thibet Mastiff.

275

-from each other and the more clearly defined against the white the spots
are the better. In size they should be from that of a sixpence to a florin,
and the rounder the better. Large ones generally run into each other,
and when too small they want boldness, and give a shotted or freckled
appearance.

The subject of our engraving, Spotted Dick, is the best built dog of
his breed I have ever Been ; he is beaten by Captain in spots and colour
by a few points, but in other respects is, I think, the best dog of the day.
He has well spotted ears, which are rarely met with, and the beautiful
bright tan spots on back of legs, &c., which are a great addition to a
Dalmatian’s beauty. Spotted Dick, formerly owned by Mr. A. W. Dalziel,
and now the property of Mr. A. G. James, Kirkby Lonsdale, was bred
by Mr. A. B. Jayne, of Upper Norwood.

Measurements of Dr. James’s Spotted BicJc: Age, 2£ years ; weight,
431b. ; height at shoulder, 21in. ; length from nose to set on of tail,
34in.; length of tail, 13in. ; girth of chest, 25in. ; girth of loin, 19|in. ;
girth of head, 15£in. ; girth of forearm, 6in. ; length of head from
ocoiput to tip of nose, 8i£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 8£in.

Chapter XIII.—THE THIBET MASTIFF.

By Corsincon.

This breed is comparatively rare in England, and therefore only
occasionally met with at our shows, but he is such a magnificent animal
that I would gladly see him bred here, as he is really well worth
cultivating for his noble appearance, and under the skill and care of
English breeders his natural good qualities, grand proportions, and
noble bearing would be developed to the utmost.

In their native country they are used as guardians of the flock
and the family, and half a dozen of them with ‘ ‘ their bristles
up” would certainly present a formidable front to marauders, human or
lupine.

In general contour he bears a considerable resemblance to our English

T 2﻿276

British Dogs.

mastiff, although, the rough dense coat and black colour is quite a
contrast to the rich fawns and fallows of our home breed, with their
close-lying short and shining jackets.

The subject of our engraving is a remarkably fine specimen, one of
two exhibited by His Eoyal Highness the Prince of Wales at the Alex-
andra Palace Show, December, 1875. The pair were exceedingly well
matched, and were much admired, Siring, whose portrait we give, being
perhaps a shade the better.

In size they are not quite equal to our native mastiffs, although the
long coat gives them an advantage in appearance, but both the specimens
shown by His Eoyal Highness were well formed, strong in the back
and loins, deep ribbed, with well developed quarters, and standing on stout
straight legs with no lack of bone ; the coat is about as long as a New-
foundland’s and very dense, not sleek and glossy, but rough, without
being harsh; the colour is black, inclining to brownish-black on some
parts of the body ; the tail is large, well furnished with hair, and carried
pretty high and with a good swirl—in fact, the term “ gawcie,” which
Burns uses to describe the Scotch colley’s tail, pretty accurately applies,
but unfortunately I can find no exact equivalent in English. Bushy yet
showy comes near it, and the Thibet mastiff carries his stem much
higher than the colley—in fact, well over the hips.

The head, wherein the character of the animal is stamped, and where
we always look first in considering the type of dog, differs considerably
from that of his English namesake, and partakes somewhat of the
character of our bloodhounds, although equally distinct from that, and it
might fairly be described as a compromise between the two, as it possesses
features common to both—the skull is shorter than that of the blood-
hound, and not so massive as that of our mastiff ; the ears are small, like
the latter, but the eyes are deep sunk, like the bloodhound’s, and show
some haw ; there is also a good deal of flew, the lips falling very deep,
quite as much so as in an ordinary specimen of a bloodhound, and with
this there is the usual concomitant throatiness, although this latter
feature is not so noticeable under the thick ruff that surrounds the throat
and neck as it is in the smooth-haired hound ; the muzzle is a trifle
longer than in our mastiffs, and the nose is wide and capacious, showing
inherent ability to hunt, although that quality may not be developed, as
he is principally used as a guard. The general appearance of the animal﻿H.R.H. THE PRINCE OF WALES'S THIBET MASTIFF “ S1RI﻿﻿The Great Dane.

277

stamps him as a distinct variety, and one of snch noble qualities, that
I would like to see such encouragement given at our Kennel Club
shows to this variety, and to the Russian wolfhound, and a few others,
as would stimulate breeders to produce them and bring them forward
at our shows in greater numbers.

Chapter XIV.—THE GREAT DANE.

BV CORSINCON.

The most consistent and also persistent advocate for including the
great Dane among the list of British dogs is Mr. Frank Adcock, of
Shevington Hall, Wigan, and his monster dog Satan and bitch Proserpina,
known among the habitues of dog shows as “ the Devil and his wife,”
are the specimens of the breed most familiar to the dog showing public.

The great Dane is referred to by those eminent naturalists, Linnaeus
and Buffon, as a prominent and distinct variety.

Buffon, who I am disposed to think held exaggerated views of the
influence of climate, classes the great Dane among those varieties that
had been modified and formed by climatic influence, and owing his origin
to the sheepdog, and the small Danish dog in his thesis is a modified
bulldog.

To follow out this argument would, however, carry us too far from the
present subject, but I must, in passing, point out the discrepancy
between Buffon, the author of the “Sportsman’s Cabinet,” and Touatt,
the latter looking on the Dalmatian as the small Dane, and the great
Dane identical with it in all but size.

The great Dane has long been a recognised breed throughout central
Europe, and, as already observed in the article on the German boar-
hound, that dog has probably a good deal of the Dane blood in him.

The Danish dog and the Irish wolfhound have been held, by Buffon and
other writers, to be identical, and most of the best authorities on the
subject admit a strong agreement in principal features.

Buffon observes of the Irish wolfhound that he strongly resembled in﻿278

British Dogs.

figure the Danish dog, but greatly exceeded the latter in stature. As
Buffon, however, says, he never saw but one Irish wolfhound, and
estimates that one at five feet high when sitting, he evidently exaggerated
the dog’s size or failed to express his meaning clearly, for it might well
be that the dog would measure five feet from the rump up to end of nose
held up while sitting.

From all I have been able to gather, there appears among the best
writers a strong agreement that there was a close affinity between the
great Dane and the Irish wolfhound, and to an infusion of great Dane
blood do I look as most hopeful to resusitate the Irish breed.

Richardson, in his “ Monograph of the Mastiff,” says:	“The Dane

rarely stands less than 30in. at the shoulder, and is usually more. His
head is broad at the temples, aud the parietal bones diverge much, thus
marking him to be a true mastiff; but, by a singular discrepancy, his
muzzle is lengthened more than even that of an ordinary hound, and the
lips are not pendulous, or, at least, but slightly so. His coat, when
thoroughbred, is rather short than fine, the tail is fine and tapering, the
neck long, the ears small and carried back, but these are invariably
taken off when the dog is a whelp.” Richardson further describes a dog
of the breed, named Hector, the property of His Grace the Duke of
Buccleugh, that measured, when eighteen years old and his legs had given
way, 32in. high at the shoulder, and computed that he must have
measured 33£in. high when in his prime. Hector was bought from a
student at Dresden.

In 1863 Sir Roger Palmer exhibited an immense black and white dog
of this breed called Sam; he stood fully 35in. at the shoulder and
weighed 2001b. In a letter to Mr. Adcock Sir Roger says that he was
extremely intelligent, very quiet, but will stand no nonsense from
strangers, and so acute were his scenting powers that he never failed to
find his owner, although liberated as much as twenty-five minutes after
he had left the house.

I do not pretend to draw a clear and distinctive line between the
German boarhound, which it is now proposed to call the German mastiff,
and the great Dane, but those of the former which I have seen had
neither, as a rule, the length of muzzle nor the kind of ear described by
Richardson.

That this breed is well worth encouraging, no one who has carefully﻿The Great Dane.

279

inspected the specimens, more or less pure, seen occasionally at our
shows, can doubt. Their immense strength, activity, and apparent
“ go,” mark them as most valuable for hunting and bringing to bay the
large and fierce game of our colonies and Indian possessions, and also
for judicious crossing with some of our native breeds for the above and
other special purposes. Of the breed Mr. Frank Adcook says in “ Dogs
of the British Islands : ” “ Enormous in size, sensitive in nose, of great
speed, unyielding in tenacity and courage, and full of intelligence ; there
is no dog that can so well sustain the part of the dog of the hunter of
large game,” and this opinion is deserving of every respect from the
writer’s knowledge and experience of the breed.

As to the purity of the dogs exhibited as great Danes, I am not in a
position to speak. Mr. Adcock’s Satan I look upon as the grandest
speoimen I have seen—much superior in size, muscularity, and power-
fulness of build, to any in the class of “Deutsche Doggen,” at the
Hanover International Exhibition of 1879, or in the excellent class of
“Grand Danois,” at the International Exhibition of Dogs, Paris, 1878,
both of which lots I inspected most carefully. That Satan, at all events,
retains the exact type of head which dogs of this breed possessed very
far back, will be proved by the inspection of a very fine painting in
the Spencer collection in the South Kensington Museum. This picture
only shows the head of a dog of this breed, but there are several other
extremely ancient pictures which conclusively prove how accurately the
type has been maintained.

The following are the weight and measurements of a great Dane :

Mr. F. Adcock’s Proserpina, a blue brindled great Dane bitch : Age, 2
years; weight, 1351b.; height at shoulder, 30in. ; length from nose to
set on of tail, 51in.; length of tail, 20Jin. ; girth of chest, 34£in.; girth
loin, 31in.; girth of head, 21in. ; girth of forearm, 9in.; length of head
from occiput to tip of nose, 12in. ; girth of muzzle midway between
eyes and tip of nose, 12£in.﻿28o

British Dogs.

Chapter XV.—THE GERMAN BOARHOUND.

By Corsincon.

The German boarhound is fairly entitled to a place here on the lines we
have laid down, namely, to include dogs not strictly British when
frequently met with at our shows, and, by the attention paid to them by
the English philokuon, may be supposed to be under process of natural-
ization.

Prom an early period in the history of our shows, specimens of the
immense German boarhonnd have frequently graced the benches, and had
the same encouragement been given to them as to the dachshund, we
would now have large classes of them; but, hitherto, they have had to
form part and parcel of that olla podrida, the variety or foreign dog
class, the most difficult of all to judge, and wherein decisions are almost
invariably eccentric and puzzling.

Many dogs shown as German boarhounds would, I am disposed to
think, be more correctly classed as great Danes ; and to that ancient
breed, I believe, the German boarhound owes much.

I do not profess to write of this breed from an extensive experience, or
with a profound knowledge ; and inquiries into its history on my part
have been unsatisfactory.

Prom all I have been able to discover, and from observations at home
and continental international exhibitions, I feel strongly convinced that
the dog is of no special purity, but rather represents selections from
many stocks used and found suitable for certain purposes.

Believing, as I do, that this is the case with nearly every breed of dog,
it raises no prejudices in my mind against the one under consideration.

The Ulmer appears to be but another name for the boarhonnd,
although it may refer more specially to a sub-variety of the breed for
which, I understand, Ulm is somewhat celebrated.

The Leonberg is another new claimant for recognition, and is also an
ally ; or, perhaps, more correctly, an alloy of this breed with New-
foundland and other varieties.

The German breeders have themselves in contemplation, I believe, to﻿The German Boarhound.

281

arrange a standard of excellence and to re-name the breed the German
mastiff.

There is, I think, mnch to be said in favour of this, for most of them,
and particularly those I have seen selected by German judges for prize
honours, exhibited more mastiff characteristics from an English point of
view than hound properties.

All this shows a haziness surrounding the breed which, I frankly
oonfess, I have not, so far, been able to penetrate, and it was rendered
none the leas dense by the variety of types among the thirty odd
specimens shown at Hanover, in 1879, by native breeders. Among these
there was great diversity in Bize, style, and colour. The reds and
brindles seemed to be most appreciated by the judges. Some of the
brindles were remarkably rich in colour, and markedly so a fine upstanding
and open-countenanced dog called Caesar, who took premier honours, as
he had also done at the Berlin Show in 1878. There were also, however,
mouse colours, blues, and blue mottles, the latter essentially a great
Dane colour ; and one, a bitch called Tigress, the property of H.S.H.
Prince Albert Solms, was black and white spotted, pretty evenly so, and
not unlike a gigantic Dalmatian with the spots exaggerated.

Regarding this peculiarity of marking, it may be well to observe that
the well-known writer, Youatt, recognises the Dalmatian and the great
Dane as identical, except in size, an opinion from which I differ, for
reasons given elsewhere.

In general appearance the German boarhound shows a good deal of the
mastiff, but is not so massive as our best modern specimens. The whole
head, and particularly the jaw, is longer, and this is added to in
appearance by the absurd praotice of mutilation of the ears. When left
on the ears fall neatly, and are rather smaller than in our mastiff. The
general build aud carriage shows a combination of strength and agility,
and the cut up flank is absent or but slight. The stern is not carried so
gaily as in our hounds, and he entirely lacks those flews, long folding
ears, and dewlap characteristics of our slow hounds. The coat is short,
thick, but soft and close, and on many specimens I have observed dew-
claws. I merely mention this latter fact because so many will still
persist in olaiming these appendages as peculiar to certain breeds,
although very little attention to faots would show that they occasionally
appear in all.﻿282

British Dogs.

It has been publicly stated that specimens of this dog have grown to
the extraordinary height of over 40in. It is said a dog of this breed,
that won at the International Show at Hamburgh, measured 3ft. 4£in. at
the shoulder. Such statements are so absurd that they scarcely require
contradiction, and are best met by giving actual measurements of
acknowledged good specimens, and this, by the courtesy of H.S.H.
Prince Albert Solms, Braunfels, Prussia, I am enabled to do, and here
append measurements of German boarhounds.

Prince Albert Solm’s Cora : Age, 4 years ; weight, 121£lb.; height at
shoulder, 28in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 51£in. ; length of
tail, 22in.; girth of chest, 33in.; girth of loin, 26£in.; girth of head,
19£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, llin.; girth of
muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 12in.

Prince Albert Solm’s Nero : Age, 3 years; weight, 1321bs. ; height at
shoulder, 29in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 48in.; length of tail,
22in. ; girth of chest, 36in. ; girth of loin, 31in.; girth of head, 22in.;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 12in.; girth of muzzle
midway between eyes and tip of nose, 12in.

Prince Albert Solm’s Sultan: Age, 3 years ; weight, llOlbs. ; height at
shoulder, 28£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 49in. ; length of
tail, 19in.; girth of chest, 33£in. ; girth of loin, 28in. ; girth of head,
21£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, llin.; girth of
muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, ll^in.

Measurements of celebrated Ulmer Dogs (Bavarian Boarhounds):

Rudolf M. Leo’s Sultam, I. ■. Age, 3 years ; weight, 1801b.; height at
shoulder, 34in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 58in.; length of
tail, 22£in.; girth of chest, 38£in. ; girth of loin, 30£in.; girth of head,
24£in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 5£in.;
colour, yellow with black spots.

Rudolf M. Leo’s Xantvpphe I.: Age, 2 years ; weight, 1261b.; height
at shoulder, 32in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 54in. ; length of
tail, 20fin.; girth of chest, 36^in.; girth of loin, 26^in.; girth of head,
21£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 5£in. ;
colour, black, with yellow spots.

Mr. H. M. Savage’s BUtz Age, 7 months and 20 days ; height at
at shoulder, 25in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 42in.; length of
tail, 17£in. ; girth of chest, 28in.; girth of loin, 22in.; girth of head,﻿The Bulldogs of Spain and the Continent. 283

lOfin.; girth, of forearm, 8 fin. ; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 9&in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in.;
girth of neck, 16fin.; colour, pure slate, with white extremities.

Mr. H. M. Savage’s Lena: Age, 7 months and 1 day; height at
shoulder, 26£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 45fin. ; length of
tail, 20in.; girth of chest, 28in. ; girth of loin, 22£in.; girth of head,
lOin. ; girth of forearm, 9fin.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 9£in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7fin.
girth of neck, 18in.; colour, pure slate, with white extremities.

Chapter XVI.—THE BULLDOGS OF SPAIN AND
THE CONTINENT.

By Frank Adcock.

The dog, of which this slight sketch attempts to treat, is one for which
Great Britain has been famous since the advent of the Romans, who con-
veyed large numbers to Italy. Sir Wm. Jardine says, “it may be
doubted whether there were in Britain two races of broad-mouthed dogs
during the Roman era; it seems to us there was but one, and in that case
the bulldog was the animal in question.” Claudian, the Latin poet (who
died 408), mentions the English bulldog, and distinguishes him from,
all other dogs, as being able to pnll down a bull. Joanes Ulizious
unmistakably describes the ancient bulldog in these words, “ Occulis ita
lippis et detortis, labris et malis adeo sordidis et pene dentibus apparent;
ut advones mera monstra videantur : at quanto deformiores es fere
meliores estimantur.” From this period, there is ample evidence of the
dissemination of this breed of dogs over the Continent, and this was much
assisted by the fact of so important a town as Bordeaux having been in the
hands of the English from the 12th to the 14th Century, and the Court of
Ring Edward, with its attendant English sports of bull and bear baiting,
having been held there for about eleven years. In about the year 1556
great numbers of English bulldogs were introduced into Spain and the﻿284

British Dogs.

Island of Cuba, by Phillip II., for the purposes of the arena, and
their decendants are to be found, (but in very limited numbers) to this
day, with all the physical and mental qualities described by Dr. Caius, of
Cambridge, in the year 1576. The doctor heads his article “Ban-
dogge,” and says : “ This kind of dogge, called a Mastyre or Bandogge,
is vast, huge, stubborne, ougly, a/nd eager; of a heavy and burthenous
body, and therefore of but little swiftnesse; terrible and frightful to
beholde, and more fearce and fell than any Arcadian curre, (notwith-
standing they are sayd to have their generation from the violent Lyon.)
They are serviceable against the Foxe and Badger, to drive wild and tame
swyne, to bayte and taJce the bull by the ear, when occasion so requireth,
one dogge or two at the utmost sufficient for that purpose, be the bull never
so monstrous, never so fearce, never so furious, never so stearne, never so
untameable:	For it is a kind of dogge capable of courage, violent and

valiant, striking could feare into the hearts of men, but standing in fear
of no man, insomuch that no weapon will make him shrink or abridge his
boldness.”

There are various pictures in existence of the dog, as described
by Dr. Caius, and all are more or less identical with the ancient
bulldog of Britain, now better known through my importation of them as
the Spanish bulldog. The most accurate representation is an oil paint-
ing on oak panel in my possession, by A. Hondius, bearing date 1585.
This was painted within nine years of the time when Dr. Caius published
his article, and may be fairly said to offer a faithful illustration of the
same. The picture represents two bulldogs attacking a wild boar in the
bed of a shallow stream. The dogs are respectively red, with a black
muzzle, and white with brindle ear patches, rose ears, long fine tails,
(termed “tyger tails,” in the article on the bulldog in the Cynographia
Brittannica, published 1800,) and from the relative size of the dogs and
the wild boar—which might have been painted from life but yesterday—
the dogs must have weighed from 1001b. to 1201b. The red dog is
represented as having a firm grip of the left ear of the boar, and the
white dog is rushing in on the other side. I have also in my possession
an engraving from a picture by Hondius showing the head of a bulldog,
who, with dogs of another breed, are about to attack a bear. The
description by CaiuB, and the illustrations by Hondius, are also well
supported by the “Master of the Game,” who not only describes the﻿The Bulldogs 0/ Spain and the Continent. 285

great size and tenacity of the ancient bnlldog, but also the most common
colour, viz., white with dark patches about the ears.

Richardson, who saw two or three specimens, thus wrote upon the
Spanish bulldogs in the early part of •the present century. “ His head
is of prodigious size, even apparently too large in proportion to his body ;
his eyes are placed very far apart, his upper lip pendulous, the ear is
small and not perfectly pendulous, being erect at the root, but the
tip falling over, colour usually tawny or light rufous ; the under jaw is
also undershot, and I do not thinJc I can give my readers a better idea
of the dog than by describi/ng him as a gigantic bulldog.” He then
goes on to say : “ Col. H. Smith conceives this race to have been
identical with the broad-mouthed dogs for whioh Britain was cele-
brated during the Roman era; and certainly as this race answers to
ancient description far better than our common bulldog, I am disposed
fully to concur with him.''

In Russia and Germany the ancient bulldog is almost extinct; and in
France but very few remain, the modem English fashion for small or toy
bulldogs having crossed the channel, and the result of the pairing of the
manufactured toy with the original stock has been the almost total
extinction of the latter in its purity. During the reign of the Commune
many of the ancient bulldogs were obtained from Bordeaux and Spain for
the purposes of the arena, but, from paucity of numbers and the dangerous
nature of their employment, but few were left alive. Bordeaux, from the
time it was occupied by the English up to within a very few years, was
the great centre from which emanated the purest of ancient bulldogs, and
the dogue de Bordeaux was at one time well known all over the Continent,
but now, owing to the stringency of the laws, the breed has practically
died out, and it is only in Spain where the remnants of this historical
race can be found, and is known as the perro de presa.

In that oountry the bulldog is still used as he was in England
in the reign of King John (a.d. 1200), and as described by Dr. Cains,
to catch and hold a bull, who, in an immense arena, unfettered by rope
or chain, or disarmed by balled horns, rushes at dog or man with
the ferocity of a tiger, and is only pinned and held by the immense
power, wonderful activity, and terrible determination so well described
by Cains. In such a oombat as this it is needless to point out
that the toy dog at present cherished by a few as the English bull-﻿286

British Dogs.

dog is, notwithstanding he is frequently possessed of unflinching
courage, quite incapable of the part assigned him by Claudian and the
subsequent writers; indeed, the dwarfed body and limbs would not only
prevent his ever being able to catch an active and unfettered bull, but
would also deprive him of the ability to make good his escape should he
feel so disposed, whilst the absurd, excessive, and unnatural shortness of
face would render a firm and lasting hold almost an impossibility. A
wretched jaded beast, tied to a stake, a toy bulldog, or indeed a game fox
terrier, would no doubt be able to pin; but it was no such miserable
exhibition as this which suggested Claudian’s “ Magnaque taurorum
fracturae colla Britannse.”

Since the subjugation of the enlarged bull or wild boar by bulldogs
has become impossible in this country, an absurd standard, founded upon
no basis, has constantly been foisted upon breeders of this variety ; and, as
Darwin remarks, “ there can be no doubt that the fancy bulldogs of the
present day have been greatly reduced in size ; ’ ’ and at the same time
other properties have been lost. The scale of points (usually made to fit
the dog owned by the author of the same) are in themselves destructive of
many of the peculiarities of the breed, because, whilst advocating the
breeding for one particular property, the framer of the scale admits his
ignorance of the force of correlated action : thus, for example, in advocat-
ing the production of a small thin ear, he is unconsciously but certainly
diminishing the thickness and volume of the skin covering the head and
neck, so necessary for the protection of an essentially gladiatorial animal
as the bulldog, and at the same time, also rendering impossible the pro-
duction of the folds of skin or wrinkles, and the hanging chaps so much
desired, and all of ,which points he insists upon in the same breath. The
amateur is also told that the tail must be destitute of rough hair, which
practically means that the coat of the dog must be of an extremely fine
nature. Now, the scientist knows full well that the cultivation of this
peculiarity tends to, and has actually resulted in, diminution of the bony
structures ; the inferior dentition; and weakness of constitution; yet the
breeder is told that large bones and teeth are a sine qud non ! Darwin has
also noticed the effect of correlated action here, for he remarks, the modem
bulldog has fine limbs, but “ this is a recently selected character.” It has
been frequently urged by those who have during the last few years flooded
the country with canine literature, that the ancient bulldog was not so﻿The Bulldogs of Spain and the Continent. 287

worthy of perpetuation as his toy descendant, because his head was not so
great in Bize, in proportion to the number of pounds weight as the toy dog.
It is a matter of some surprise that the fact, that the head of a King
Charles spaniel, or that of a toy terrier is much greater in proportion for
weight, than any 401b. toy bulldog should have escaped the notice of
these gentlemen, and also the fact that dwarfs of all the animal creation
have heads greatly out of proportion to their stature.

I think my readers will agree with me, that it is far more desirable
to rescue the remains of this breed, for which England was once so
famous, than to attempt to cultivate that which is simply a puny
and imperfect imitation. That nearly all the dog show winners owe what
they possess to the cross with the Spanish dog Bigheaded Billy, or to my
Toro, a reference to the Kennel Club calendar will prove, and I have no
doubt there is a large reserve of English gentlemen of broad views who
will join the ranks of those who have, during the last ten years, done so
much to reinstate a dog unquestionably more desirable in every way than
the absurd apology once so high in favour :

The following description and measurements of Toro are taken from
The Field of the 27th Sept., 1873, and may be of some service as a guide
to breeders :

“ Toro is a huge, massive dark chestnut or ‘carroty’ brindled dog,
with blackish muzzle ; he has very deep flews, high temples, large
nostrils, and is very much underhung, and, for his size, short in the face.
His eyes are tolerably full, and a good deal of the white is shown ; the
‘ stop ’ or indentation between the eyes is large and deep, and runs high
up the head. The Bkin about the head is very loose, and falls into
wrinkles and folds when the ears of the dog are erected; and a deep
double dewlap runs from the angles of the mouth to the sternum. His
ears have been cut out, very little of the burr being left, and this greatly
detracts from the apparent size of his head. His neck is arched, short,
very thiok and muscular, and covered with quantities of loose skin ; the
shoulders broad and flat at the top, standing well out from the ribs, and
very muscular ; the elbows well out from the ribs ; the forearm very thick,
and slightly bowed ; feet large and round, and furnished with very strong
olaws ; the chest is great, and not only broad, but deep, and the ribs are
very round. There is a considerable fall at the shoulders, and from that
point the loins begin to rise, the arch terminating at the insertion of the﻿288

British Dogs.

tail. This is placed very low, has a downward crook at the root and
another at the end, is very short and fine in bone, and is never erected so
high as the level of the dog’s back. The loins are strong and muscular,
as are also the hind quarters, the stifles turning.out slightly, and the hocks
rather close together. The whole of the hind quarters are small, as com-
pared with the fore quarters, and are considerably higher. The coat is
very fine and smooth, and the hair very hard in texture. In showing
condition Toro weighs 901b.

“ The following are his exact measurements : Head, 22in. ; chop, close
up to eye, 14in.; length of face from ooraer of eye to tip of nose,
2£in.; from comer of eye down to angle of mouth, 5in.; between eyes
2fin.; from ear to ear across forehead, 5£in.; from top of nose to
under jaw, 3in. ; projection of lower incisors beyond those in the upper
jaw when the mouth is closed lin.; between canines in upper jaw,
2mh. ; in lower jaw about 2in., being broken; round neck, 19in. ; length
of neck, 5in. ; round ribs, 31in. ; across chest, 13in.; between forelegs,
9in.; length of neck and body from apex of 6kull to root of tail, 30in. ;
round forearm, 8£in ; round loins, 21in.; height at shoulder, 22in. ; from
point of elbow to ground, llin.

“ Toro, although very forbidding in appearance, is exceedingly quiet and
docile, and is possessed of great intelligence ; he retains all the peouliar
attributes of the ancient British bulldog—such as size, courage, &c. He
will only pin an animal by the head, and when fighting is perfectly silent
and utterly regardless of pain.. He is rather slow in this movements, has
a rolling kind of gait, and carries his head low.

“ With such a dog as we have described to start with—possessing as he
does form, size, courage, and, what is if anything of greater importance,
clean blood to cross out with the inbred stock which we have in England
—Mr Adcock will, we think, have little difficulty in re-establishing this
ancient breed.”

The cross with Toro has proved exceedingly valuable, both upon the
show bench and in the increase in size, constitution and bone; and, in
conjunction with the strains of my champion Ajax and Queen Bess, has
produced a dog, who, when full grown, will weigh from 1001b. to 1121b.

﻿﻿3

S

I

r

Q

O

Pi

H-(

Pi

W

S

Pi

w

H

O

to

W

o

Q

3

Oil

£

PQ

h

Pi

8

4

Is

£

«§ 8

? i

& s

I ^

^»
^ *

•s

s

S’

?

LO

cq

ro

'si

i

3

$﻿GROUP III

Vermin Destroyers: The Terriers.

Including:

1.	The Fox Terrier.

2.	The Wire-haired Fox

Terrier.

j. The Dandie Dinmont
Terrier.

4.	The Bedlington Terrier.

5.	The Black and Tan

Terrier.

6.	The Skye Terrier.

7.	The Bull Terrier.

8.	The Scotch Terrier.

9.	The Irish Terrier.

10.	The White English

Terrier.

11.	The Airedale Terrier.

12.	The Aberdeen Terrier.

Some of the varieties included in this group differ
widely from each other in physical characteristics. On
the one hand we have the light and nimble black and
tan, with a long head and gradually tapering jaw, and
on the other the low-legged and very strongly built
Dandie Dinmont, with a comparatively large and wide
head and more truncated muzzle. All of them, however,
closely resemble each other in the work they are mostly
kept to, and which, as it is their legitimate business,
they take to with most readiness and zest.

All of them have been, doubtless, much modified from
the native terrier of Britain of some centuries ago,
and many of them are admittedly manufactured by the
admixture of other kinds with the terrier base, yet as﻿2go

British Dogs.

every class of them possesses marked qualities in common,
and are, above all things, vermin destroyers, and in a
variety of ways used for that purpose, they thus form
a natural group on the lines we laid down for classi-
fying the dogs upon which we treat in these pages.


Chapter XVII.—THE FOX TERRIER.

By T. H. Scott (Peeping Tom).

Among all those who have written on fox terriers of late years, none
appear to have been inclined to go to the root of the matter and tell
us anything of the origin and early history of this breed.

A general idea seems to prevail that fox terriers are a production of
modern times, and this idea has no doubt been fostered by the way in
which spurious imitations of them have been from time to time manu-
factured, and by the ignorance of judges who have permitted various
and very opposite types to find favour.

The fox terrier proper is not a modern breed, and perhaps there were
as good dogs fifty years ago as there are now.

Some of us will, I dare say, remember the old black and tan English
terrier—not in any way resembling the whip-tailed, smooth-coated, and
pencil-toed black and tan of the present day, but a dog of very similar
appearance to the Old Jock and Old Trap type of fox terriers.

My father has at present in his possession a painting of a noted terrier
that belonged to his grandfather. This dog was a black and tan—that
is to Bay, black, with a considerable quantity of light tan, and white
breast. He, upon one occasion, went to ground in Newburgh Park, and
stayed several hours, until dug out, when it was found that he was
engaged with two large badgers, and though fearfully out up, he showed
no signs of giving in. This dog had good drop ears, and in all other﻿The Fox Terrier.

291

respects except colour would have held his own on a show bench at the
present day.

I believe there is no doubt that there was an equally old breed of
white English terriers of the same character, and it was by crossing
these two sorts that the colour of our modern kennel terriers was pro-
duced. The black and tan was, from its colour, difficult to keep in
view, and mixed colour looked more uniform with the hounds.

However, even to the present day, or at least till very recently, the
Duke of Beaufort has kept up a breed of black and tan fox terriers,
and excellent dogs they are.

Treadwell, the huntsman of the Old Berkshire, has had several good
terriers—notably Tip—and these were descended from a black and tan
dog he had with the Cottesmore twenty-five years ago, called Charley.
This dog was bred by Mr. Cauverley, of Greetham, near Oakham, whose
family has had the breed for a century. Some years ago I was at the Old
Berkshire kennels, and saw Treadwell’s terriers. They were a hardy,
useful sort, weighing from 101b. to 161b.

Old Trap was descended from a black and tan breed, and I believe Old
Jock was also. These dogs were thoroughly genuine terriers, and their
blood at the present day asserts itself in many of the best prize winners
we have. Unfortunately, owing to the want of authentic pedigree
registries and the not very scrupulous consciences of certain dealers and
breeders, Old Jock and Old Trap have been made responsible for a great
deal of stock with which in reality they had no connection. Old Jock
was bred by Capt. Percy Williams, and was by his Jock out of Grove
Pepper.

This brings me to a consideration of the Grove terriers, which, in the
hands of Jack Morgan, soon attained to the greatest fame. It may,
indeed, be questioned if, at the present day, we have a better bitch than
old Grove Nettle. I may also direot attention to another terrier, not so
generally known, that was bred by Jack Morgan, when huntsman to
Lord Galway. That was Trimmer, better known as Cooper’s Trimmer,
and he achieved lasting fame as being the sire of Belvoir Joe. Of the
Belvoir terriers, however, I shall have something more to say.

Of the same breed as the Grove are the terriers, which Ben Morgan
introduced into Lord Middleton’s kennels ; and, though their lot did not
fall in early days among the show world, they were none the less good-

U 2﻿292

British Dogs.

looking and thoroughly up to their work. I well remember Nettle of
this breed. She was the granddam of Belvoir Joe, and a thorough
terrier, quite up to Bhow form. Another of the Bame strain was Old
Vic, whose daughter Vic, by Old Tartar, produced Jester II. The two
Vies, for many seasons, did excellent service with the hounds.

Another very old breed, not generally known to fame, was many years
in the hands of the late Mr. F. Bell, of the Hall, Thirsk. Some eighteen
years ago two of his terriers distinguished themselves greatly in an otter
hunt that took place in the Colbeck—one of the tributaries of the Swale.
Twig, one of these dogs, several times bolted the otter, and was the
first to tackle him on crossing a shoal. For this he nearly lost his life,
as he was found to be bitten through one of the veins in his neck, and
nearly bled to death. The sister to this dog—a bitch called Venom—
won one of the first prizes that were ever offered for fox terriers. This
was at Yarmouth. Twig was an exceedingly good-looking dog, showing
no bull, and as good as most of the present winners. He was marked
with black and grey tan on the head. I am sorry to say, however,
that Mr. Bell’s breed has become well-nigh extinct.

Mr. Bower, of Oswaldkirk, has long been the possessor of terriers
that have often become notorious for doughty deeds; and people still
tell the story of Old Jim, who worried a very large and savage monkey
that belonged to Sir George Wombwell. The dog was only eleven
months old, and had previously been considerably bullied by the monkey.
At last, upon the eventful day, he was observed to go towards the mon-
key’s yard, look inquiringly around, doubtless to see if any one was near,
and then he went in. Some time afterwards the brewer, who had seen
him enter the yard and not return, went to look after him, and
found the monkey dead, while the dog was so punished he could not
move.

Mr. Bowers’s breed has been extensively used in kennels in the North
of England ; but I have little doubt that there is a cross of bull in it.

Mr. H. Gibson has long been well known as a breeder of first-class
fox terriers, and he has, in fact, owned them for above thirty years.
The first he ever possessed was a bitch bred at Hams Hall, in War-
wickshire, by a gamekeeper named Massy. This bitch killed a favourite
cat belonging to the present Mr. Adderley’s mother, and so had to be
got rid of. Massy consequently sold her to a barber named Collins, of﻿The Fox Terrier.

293

Coleshill, and lie went to the school where Mr. Gibson then was and sold
her to him for all the money he then possessed, i.e., £3. Mr. Gibson
now says he wishes he could find a few like her at .£100 each. Her name
was Fly. Mr. Gibson also tells me that in those days there were many
good fox terriers to be found, and that gamekeepers used them instead
of spaniels. They were valued from 20s. to 40s. each. The Atherstone,
the South Warwickshire (in Yyner’s time), and the Belvoir (in Goosey’s
day) had plenty, such as you can hardly find now.

From the Belvoir kennels thirty-five years ago Sir Thomas Whichcote
got Old Tyrant, and he was of a sort that never has been surpassed.
This breed was kept very select, and among other direct descendants
of it I may mention Belvoir Venom, who was bred by Goodall, at
Aswarby, in 1860. He now has a dog and bitch out of her by Belvoir
Joe. They are eight years old, and are probably the best bred terriers
at present in existence. Their names are Viper and Violet. Venom
passed into the hands of Mr. Wootton when she was over twelve years
of age, and he had unprecedented success in breeding many pups from
such an old bitch.

I think few will differ from me when I say that the Grove and Belvoir
have taken more pride in their breed of terriers than any other pack,
and have crossed them as carefully as they did their hounds. I will first
make a few remarks on the Belvoir terriers ; and, as Belvoir Joe is the
best known to breeders of the present day, I will give his pedigree, which
can be traced back for upwards of forty years. Belvoir Joe was bred
by W. Cooper, a late huntsman to the Belvoir, and was by his Trimmer
out of Trinket—a grand-looking bitch, and one that would take a lot of
getting over by the best of the present time ; Trinket was by the Belvoir
Earth Stopper’s Trap out of Ben Morgan’s Nettle; Trimmer, from the
Grove, was by a favourite dog of the late Sir Riohard Sutton’s, out
of a bitch belonging to Tom Day, late huntsman to the Quom. Ben
Morgan was huntsman to Lord Middleton, and he got Nettle from his
brother at the Grove. I have seen Nettle ; she was a very good looking
terrier, rather heavily marked with black and tan ; she got a prize or two
at the early Yorkshire shows. The Belvoir Earth Stopper’s Trap was
by the late Will Goodall’s Doc, bred by a late huntsman called Rose ;
and Goodall always declared that Doc was the only dog he ever had or
knew that could draw a fox out of the main earths near Belvoir Castle.﻿294

British Dogs.

Cooper took great pains in keeping the breed pure during his time at
Belvoir, and got several of the old black and tan sort, mentioned before,
from Mr. Wm. Singleton, of Caythorpe, near Grantham, a noted breeder
of them, and he kept them free from bull for over forty years. This
strengthens my belief that the white, blaok, and tan terrier of the pre-
sent day is, or should be, descended from the old black and tan. I
cannot trace the present breed of Belvoir terriers further back than Tom
Goosey’s day, over forty years ago ; his Tyrant was a noted dog, and he
afterwards became the property of Sir Thomas Whichcote, who has kept
the breed pure up to the present day. Sir Thomas bred the celebrated
Belvoir Venom from this strain when young Goodall was with him, and
there are three terriers still in existence by Belvoir Joe out of Belvoir
Venom, viz., two of which belong to Will. Goodall, of the Pytchley,
named Viper and Violet, the other being the property of Cooper, called
Grip. These, it is needless to say, I look upon as the best bred terriers
now living, and their blood is invaluable to all lovers of the pure kennel
terrier.

Jack Morgan has been, I believe, chiefly instrumental in bringing the
Grove terriers to the perfection they attained, for it is beyond dispute
that the Grove have turned out two as good, or better, than anything of
the present day. These are Old Jock and Grove Nettle. Jock was out of
the Grove Pepper, by a black and tanned dog, Capt. Percy Williams’s
Jock ; but I do not quite know the correct pedigree of Nettle. I believe
she was by a dog belonging to Mr. J. B. Hodgson, M.P.H., out of Gimlet,
by old Grove Tartar out of Rose, by Grove Trickster out of Nettle, by a
Grove dog out of Mr. Poljambe’s old Cambridge Vic. There was a Nettle
breed as above, and she is either Grove Nettle or Ben Morgan’s Nettle.
I see, however, in the Kennel Club Stud Book that Grove Nettle is said
to be by Merry’s Grove Tartar out of Rev. W. Handley’s Sting. I
have omitted to state that J. Morgan’s Spit and Topper were good dogs,
and the sires of good ones.

The Quorn have never been famed for their terriers, although I be-
lieve Mr. Musters had Ragman and Fussey when Master and Mr. Mur-
chison had a nice bitch named Psyche from those kennels, who won a
prize, beating that miserable specimen Bellona. Mr. Murchison put
Psyche to Old Jock, and Mr. Allison got one of the pups, which I have
seen ; it was a rare sort, and perfection for its work. Fan, also from﻿The Fox Terrier.

295

the Quom, bred the prize dog Pantaloon; she was a very beautifully
made bitch, with excellent coat. Terriers are never used in a galloping
country like the Quom, excepting in cub hunting time, when Tom Firr
takes out - a couple, descended from the present prize strains, and I
believe they do their work well when needed. The Duke of Grafton
always had a good terrier, and Crab, a noted dog some years ago, was
by Belvoir Joe out of a bitch of his.

Ben Morgan, when with Lord Middleton, got together a good team of
terriers, chiefly from his brother, and they won a prize or two in York-
shire. Will Thompson, the earth stopper, has kept up the breed, and
bred Jester II. from Vic., a direct descendant of the old breed. The York
and Ainsty had a good lot in the time of old Will Danby, but since he left
they have been crossed with bull.

Having reviewed the most noted breeds of pure kennel terriers, let us
consider how many dogs there are available for stud purposes, possess-
ing the pure blood in their pedigree, unalloyed by the objectionable
strains of beagle and Italian greyhounds. The Foiler blood is good, and
I should not object to breed from his son Flinger out of Brokenhurst
Nettle, by Hornet out of Cottingham Nettle. Reflections have lately been
cast on the breeding of Cottingham Nettle; but, whether the pedigree
given with her is correct or not, she looks a well-bred terrier, and I have
no doubt she is one. She is also the dam, granddam, and great-granddam
of winners ; and I like the heading of her son Jester, by Old Jock. Jester
II. is, in my opinion, second to nothing, but Viper and Grip for good
kennel blood ; he is by Old Jester out of Vic, by Old Tartar out of the
Old Vic, a daughter of Old Nettle. Another good bred dog is Beppo
(late Viper), by Belgrave Joe out of Vixen, by Terry’s Trapper out of
Vene, by Old Trap. And Mr. Gibson’s Brokenhurst Joe, by Belgrave Joe
out of Tricksy by Chance, will do, as will Turk ; for although there is a
doubt about his breeding, he undoubtedly gets good stock, and he is also
the grandsire of winners. I would much sooner breed from a dog with an
unauthenticated pedigree that gets good stock, and is also the grandsire
of good ones, than from such animals as Diver, Draco, Brick, Bitters, or
Trimmer. Diver was by a bull terrier ; Draco was, I have heard, by a
carriage dog ; Brick was nearly related to a beagle : Bitters’ dam haB no
pedigree, and he has got no good stock; and Trimmer’s sire (Rap) was
undershot, and his dam had prick ears. Some of my readers will no﻿2g6

British Dogs.

doubt say, there are the champions Buffet and Nimrod, and their sire
Buffer. Buffet must have had a lot of chances, and has got nothing
worthy of notice, with the exception of the second prize dog at Nottingham,
and he had the same fault as most of the Buffer breed, viz.,-heavy ears
hung helplessly down by the side of the head; and I think that,
with hardly an exception, the two worst dogs at Nottingham were
by Nimrod; they had ears that would have suited a foxhound, and
they were out of different bitches. Buffer, although he has got two
exceedingly good ones, is the sire of some of the worst I ever saw—
one, own brother to Speculation, weighs about 301b., and has immense
ears.

I will now give my opinion as to how a first-class fox terrier should
be made. The head should be of fair length, not too long, but in
proportion to the size of the dog. The jaw should be muscular, and
the muzzle not too fine ; and, of course, the nose should be black.
The ears small, not very thin, and dropping forward, so as to keep
out the dirt. The eye must be small, rather sunken, and dark, a
prominent eye being objectionable, as showing bull. The neck should
be of fair length, lean, and muscular; the shoulders long, fine, and
sloping ; and the chest deep and rather narrow ; the back short and
strong; and the loin slightly arched and full of muscle. A very im-
portant part is the legs. The fore legs must be straight and strong
in bone, and the feet small, round, and arched, with a good thick
sole. This is of much importance, as a dog with a thin sole soon
gets footsore. The thighs, of course, muscular, and the hocks straight
and well let down. The tail should be strong, and set on rather
high; and the coat hard and abundant, but close and smooth.
The carriage of a good terrier should be gay and lively, and the ex-
pression of the face intelligent and good tempered. There is one thing
I want particularly to impress on readers, and that is, that a fox terrier
should in no way resemble “a brick with the comers knocked off,” or
“a shorthorn,” a simile that has frequently been used by more than one
writer on fox terriers. Could anyone imagine an animal whose formation
is less adapted for speed and endurance than a shorthorn, unless a brick
could be endowed with life P If a fox terrier’s build has been likened to
a foxhound or good hunter, I would have agreed; but a shorthorn or
brick, never !﻿﻿﻿The Fox Terrier.

297

The standard recommended by the Fox Terrier Club is as follows :—

“1. Head : The skull should be flat and moderately narrow; broader
between the ears, and gradually decreasing in width to the eyes. Not
much ‘ ‘ stop ’ ’ should be apparent; but there should be more dip in the
profile, between the forehead arid top jaw, than is seen in the case of a
greyhound. The ears should be V-shaped, and rather small; of mode-
rate thickness, and dropping forward closely to the cheek, not hanging by
the side of the head, like a foxhound’s. The jaw should be strong and
muscular, but not too full in the cheek; should be of fair punishing
length, but not so as in any way to resemble the greyhound or modern
English terrier. There should not be much falling away below the eyes ;
this part of the head should, however, be moderately chiselled out, so as
not to go down in a straight slope like a wedge. The nose, towards which
the muzzle must slightly taper, should be black. The eyes should be
dark rimmed, small, and rather deep set; full of fire and life. The teeth
should be level and strong.

“2. The neck should be clean and muscular, without throatiness, of fair
length, and gradually widening to the shoulders.

“ 3. The shoulders should be fine at the points, long, and sloping. The
chest deep, and not broad.

“ 4. The back should be short, straight, and strong, with no appearance
of slackness behind the shoulders ; the loin broad, powerful, and very
slightly arched. The dog should be well ribbed up with deep back ribs,
and should not be flat-sided.

“ 5. The hind-quarters should be strong and muscular, quite free from
droop or orouch ; the thighs long and powerful; hocks near the ground,
the dog standing well up on them, like a foxhound, without much bend in
the stifles.

“ 6. The stern should be set on rather high, and carried gaily; but
not over the back, or curled. It should be of good strength,
anything approaching a pipe-stopper tail being especially objection-
able.

“ 7. The legs, viewed in any direction, must be straight, showing little
or no appearance of ankle in front. They should be large in bone
throughout, the elbows working freely just clear of the side. Both fore
and hind legs should be carried straight forward in travelling, the stifles
not turning outwards. The feet should be round, compact, and not too﻿298

British Dogs.

large ; the toes moderately arched, and turned neither in nor out. There
should be no dew claws behind.

“ 8. The coat should be smooth, but hard, dense, and abundant.

“ 9. Colour : White should predominate. Brindle, red, or liver mark-
ings are objectionable. Otherwise thife point is of little or no im-
portance.

“ 10. Symmetry, size, and character : The dog must present a generally
gay, lively, and active appearance. Bone and strength in a small
compass are essentials ; but this must not be taken to mean that a
fox terrier should be cloggy or in any way coarse. Speed and endurance
must be looked to as well as power, and the symmetry of the foxhound
taken as a model. The terrier, like the hound, must on no account be
leggy ; neither must he be too short in the leg. He should stand like a
cleverly-made hunter—covering a lot of ground, yet with a short back,
as before stated. He will thus attain the highest degree of propelling
power, together with the greatest length of stride that is compatible with
the length of his body. Weight is not a certain criterion of a terrier’s
fitness for his work. General shape, size, and contour are the main
points ; and if a dog can gallop and stay, and follow his fox, it matters
little what his weight is to a pound or so, though, roughly speaking,
it may be said he should not scale over 201b. in show condition.

“ Wire-haired Fox Terriers.—This variety of the breed should resemble
the smooth sort in every respect, except the coat, which should be
broken. The harder and more wiry the texture of the coat is, the
better ; on no account should the dog look or feel woolly, and there
should be no silky hair about the poll or elsewhere.

“ The coat should not be too long, so as to give the dog a shaggy
appearance, but at the same time it should show a marked and distinct
difference all over from the smooth species.

“ Points.—Head and ears, 15 ; neck, 5 ; shoulders and chest, 15 ; back
and loin, 10 ; hind quarters, 5; stern, 5 ; legs and feet, 20 ; coat, 10 ;
symmetry and character, 15.—Total, 100.

“ Disqualifying Points.—1. Nose, white, cherry, or spotted to a con-
siderable extent with either of these colours.

“ 2. Ears, prick, tulip, or rose.

“3. Mouth, much undershot.

“ (Signed)	W. Allison, Sec.”﻿The Fox Terrier.

299

Weights and measurements of fox terriers :

B.ev. F. De Castro’s Buffer (sire of champions Buffet, Nimrod, &c.) :
Age, 8 years and 6 months ; weight, 17alb.; height at shoulder, 14in. ;
length from nose to set on of tail, 26Jin.; length of tail, 4Jin. ; girth
of ohest, 20Jin. ; girth of loin, 17Jin. ; girth of head, 13in. ; girth of
forearm, 5in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 7 Jin.; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in.

Mr. J. T. Carver’s Brokerihwrst Bob : Weight, 17flb.; height at
shoulder, 14in. ; girth of chest, 18in.; girth of loin, 16in. ; girth of
head, 12Jin.; girth of forearm, 4jin.	; length	of head	from	occiput	to

tip of nose, 7Jin. ; girth of muzzle	midway	between	eyes	and tip	of

nose, 9in.

Mr. J. C. Tinne’s Brolcenhurst Frolic : Weight, 17Jlb. ; height at
shoulder, 13Jin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 25Jin. ; girth of chest,
18Jin.; girth of loin, 18in. ; girth of head, llfin.; girth of arm, 4Jin.;
girth of forearm, 4in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 6fin.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7Jin.

Mr. G. Heritage’s Nell: Weight, 161b. ; height at shoulder, 13in. ;
length from nose to set on of tail, 27in ; length of tail, 4Jin. ; girth of
of chest, I6in.; girth of loin, 12in. ; girth of head, 10Jin.; girth of
arm, 5Jin.; girth of forearm, 3Jin.	; length	of head	from	occiput	to

tip of nose, 7in.; girth of muzzle	midway	between	eyes	and tip	of

nose, 6in.

Mr. J. T. Carver’s Sirius : Weight, 17Jib.; height at shoulder, 14in.;
girth of chest, 19Jin.; girth of loin, 17in.; girth of head, 13Jin.; girth
of arm, 7Jin. ; girth of forearm, 5in.; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, 7 Jin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 8in.

Mr. A. Hardy’s Spot : Weight, 17Jin. ; height at shoulder, 13Jin.;
length from nose to set on of tail, 25in. ; length of tail, 4Jin. ; girth of
chest, 20in,; girth of loin, I7in.; girth of head, 12Jin.; girth of arm,
7Jin. ; girth of forearm, 5in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
7Jin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in.

Mr. W. J. Haughton’s Tyrant: Weight, 181b.; height at shoulder,
13in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 27in.; length of tail, 5in.; girth
of chest, 4Jin. ; girth of loin, 14Jin.; girth of head, lljin.; girth of
forearm lin. above elbow, 4}in. ; girth of forearm lin. below elbow, 4Jin.;﻿3°o

British Dogs.

length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 6fin.; girth of muzzle mid-
way between eyes and tip of nose, 6in.

Mr. J. C. Tinne’s Vixen Weight, 171b. ; height at shoulder, 14in. ;
length from nose to set on of tail, 28in. ; girth of chest, 19iin.; girth of
loin, 14|in. ; girth of head, llfin. ; girth of arm, 5fin. ; girth of fore-
arm, 4iin. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 7£in.; girth of
muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in.

---—-

Chapter	XVIII.—THE WIRE-HAIRED FOX

TERRIER.

By W. Allison.

It is not unfrequently said and written that the fox terrier is a com-
paratively modern invention, and that he was compounded from various
elements, such as beagle, old English terrier, bulldog, Ac., at no very
remote date.

This, as a matter of fact, is very far from the truth, for whatever
foolish persons have done in the way of manufacturing the breed for
show purposes, the fox terrier, pure and simple, is in fact the old
English terrier. As a proof of this let me quote Dr. John Kaye, or
Cains, as he called himself, who was physician to Edward VI.,
Mary, and Elizabeth, and amongst other works wrote one on English
dogs. The title page runs thus : “Of English Dogges, by John Caius
Doctor of Phisicke in the Universitie of Cambridge, 1576. Iohannes
Caius a profound clerke and a ravenous devourer of learning, was requested
by Conradus Gesnerus to write a treatise on the dogges of England.”
Then follows the list of them, which classes the “ Terrare ” with the
“ Harier ” and the “ Bludhunde,” under the denomination “ Hnnde.”
Writing then “of the dogge called a Terrar,” he says: “Another
sort there is which hunteth the foxe and the badger or greye onely, whom
we call terrars, because they (after the manner and custome of ferrets in
searching for connyes), creep into the grounde, and by that mcanes make﻿The Wire-haired Fox Terrier.

301

afrayde, nyppe, and byte the foxe and the badger in such sorte that eyther
they teare them in pieces with theyre teeth, beying in the bosome of the
earth, or else hayle and pull them perforce out of their lurking angles,
dark dongeons and close caves, or at the least through conceaved feare,
drive them out of their hollow harbours, insomuch that they are com-
pelled to prepare speedy flight, and being desirous of the next (albeit not
the safest) refuge, are otherwise taken and intrapped with snares and
nettes layde over holes to the same purpose.”

Here, then, we have the description of terriers’ work, and a very good
description it is, and we may assume that the terrier of those days was
a rough and ready customer, suitable in size, coat, and gameness for
the work he had to perform. Unfortunately Dr. Cains does not go on
to describe his appearance, and we must come to a late date for informa-
tion. “The Sporting Dictionary,” published 1803, under the head
Terrier, says —

“ Terriers of even the best blood are now bred of all colours; red,
black (with tan faces, flanks, feet, and legs) ; brindled, sandy—some few
brown pied, white pied, and pure white; as well as one sort of each
colour rough and wire-haired, the other soft and smooth, and what is
rather extraordinary the latter not much deficient in courage to the
former, but the rough breed must be acknowledged the most severe and
invincible biter of the two.

‘ ‘ Since foxhunting is so deservedly and universally popular in every
county where it can be enjoyed, these faithful little animals have become
so exceedingly fashionable that few stables of the independent are seen
without them. Four and five guineas is no great price for a handsome,
well bred terrier. ’ ’

Thus we may see that smooth and wire-haired fox-terriers existed con-
temporaneously in those days, and that the word terrier is not applied to
any dog, except those fitted for hunting and going to ground.

The modem Manchester terrier, and white English terrier could not
possibly be classed in such a category, while, as to the black and tan
colour of the last oentury and beginning of this, it was quite different
from that of the so called Manchester terrier: that is to say, the tan
was lighter and more abundant—such things as pencilled toes, thumb
marks, &c., being altogether absent, while the shape and character of
the dog was that of the modern fox terrier, as may be evidenced by old﻿302

British Dogs.

pictures, and by the breed which the Duke of Beaufort, Treadwell, and
others preserved until quite recently.

Now, having premised that wire-haired terriers have, or ought to have,
as good antecedents as their smooth brethren, it behoves us to look at
them as they are, and we shall find that while the smooth sort have for
many years excited the greatest interest, the rough one has languished in
comparative obscurity. Nay, at some shows, he has even been relegated to
the ranks of the “ Non-Sporting Dogs ”—while the Kennel Club actually
made a retrograde movement at their show in 1879 by removing the wire-
haired division from the arbitrament of the fox terrier judges.

All this is a base libel on the breed. A good wire-haired terrier is one
of the most sporting of all dogs—ready for anything; and though the
writer of this has given more attention to the smooth kind, he would be
the last to deny that, unless the smooth dog is of good and pure strain,
with plenty of coat, the rough one is the better sportsman of the two.

It is, no doubt, a fact, that any breed of dogs that is vastly in fashion
runs a great danger. So many specimens become valuable merely for
their show qualifications that would otherwise have been knocked on the
head as rank curs—or at least, never bred from. But, as it is, the unrea-
soning public breed indiscriminately from prize winners ; and, besides
that, certain sharp customers are for ever at work manufacturing what
they consider better sorts than the real article. Is it said a terrier’s head
should be long; they go for assistance to the greyhound. He Bhould
have lots of bone; they obtain it from the beagle, and so on. Thus it
is that a great number of our smooth fox terriers are irritating brutes
without any idea of their work, or of hunting, which is a great point;
for a terrier who is not a keen hunter, and does not lash an ever-busy
stern, either along a hedgerow or in cover, is not the right sort at all;
while if he will give tongue on a scent so much the better.

Avoiding, however, the mongrelised smooth dog, and sticking to good
old strains, we should say there is not twopence to choose between the
smooth and the wire-hair for work. It is submitted that a close, dense,
smooth coat will always turn wet better than one that is broken.

On this point “ Stonehenge” says : “ The Fox Terrier Club descrip-
tion does not sufficiently, I think, insist on the thick and soft undercoat,
which should always be regarded as of great importance in resisting wet
and cold. An open long coat is even worse than a thick short one for﻿The Wire-haired Fox Terrier.

303

this purpose, as it admits the wet to the skin and keeps it there, whereas
the short coat speedily dries.” There is no doubt this undercoat is of
great importance, but even when it exists in perfection, the divisions
among the longer hair must allow a more ready access for rain and wet
in the interstioes than would be the case with a smooth dog, whose thick,
dense coat lies flat and close together.

But the wire-haired terrier, from the absence of those causes that have
so damaged the smooth race, has preserved in obscurity all the true
working capacity of the tribe, for a very simple reason, that as a rule he
has been bred solely for work.

There can be no doubt that in point of quality he is considerably
behind the smooth hair ; indeed, what would have happened to the race
had not Kendal’s Old Tip come to the rescue and got some really good-
looking ones, such as Mr. Carrick’s Venture, Mr. Shirley’s Tip, Mr.
Hayward Field’s Tussle, and others, it is impossible to say. Indeed, it
is very seldom, even now, that one can And a good-looking dog of the
breed without some serious fault.

The north countrymen have paid much greater attention to the breed
than the south, and it was there that Kendal’s Tip did good service with
the Sinnington for some years. Mr. Carrick, of Carlisle has always a
few good ones, which he uses with the otter-hounds, and several of them,
such as Vixen and Venture, have been very successful at shows.

The late Charles Kirby, of Malton, owned some excellent terriers,
chiefly from strains possessed by the Rev. C. Legard. Among these was
Sam, who afterwards belonged to the writer, as game a dog as ever
walked, but short of coat. He won a prize or two and was worried in
the kennels. His blood proved very valuable, and may be met with in
such dogs as Mr. 6. Hogg’s Topper, and several others, such as Sting
(K.C.S.B. 5629).

Among others of Kirby’s was Vic. (K.C.S.B. 6712), a beautiful bitch by
Capt. Skipworth’s Tartar out of Venom, by Lord Milton’s Sam out of Rev.
C. Legard’s Miss, and there was also Tip, now called Tussle, a rare little
dog, one of the few wire-haired terrier dogs of the present day that is
juBt the right size—for be it remembered that the wire-haired terrier has
for a long time been the companion of rabbit and rat catohers, so that
his size has been permitted to increase in a way to unfit him for his
legitimate purpose.﻿304

British Dogs.

Mr. Colling, of Marske-by-the-Sea, is never without a good dog or
bitch of the sort, and from his Patch, who hailed from the Hurworth
Kennels, he bred Motley, a smooth dog, by Old Jester, who won several
prizes in good company.

Mr. A. H. Easten has been very successful with several of his, of whom
Tip, by Old Venture, did great things in his day ; and we have the north
country further strengthened now by Mr. Petler, of York, having pur-
chased Gorse, who is without doubt the best show dog of the day—albeit,
by no means perfect.

The bitches, strangely enough, seem to be considerably in advanoe of
the dogs in show properties; and probably no one has brought out so
many good ones as Mr. G. P. Richardson, who carried all before him with
Bramble, Birch, and Bristles—the two last mentioned being now the
property of Mr. Shirley, who should be able to breed something good
from them with his well-known dog Spike.

Mr. A. Fitz Roy may be mentioned as one who has exhibited terriers of
this breed with success, his Madge and Minx being very good samples.
Then, of course, there has always something out of the common hailing
from Nottingham, either from Mr. Wootton’s, Mr. Terry’s, or Mr.
Hulse’s kennels.

The Rev. J. Russell, who is certainly the father of fox terrier breeders,
tells us that he has bred his dogs since 1815, and their pedigree has
been kept quite pure, exoept that he once admitted an admixture of old
Jock, a high compliment to the old dog.

The points of the wire-haired fox terrier are precisely the same as
those of the smooth one, with the exception of the coat, which should be
broken. The harder and more wiry the texture of the coat is the better.
On no account should the dog look or feel woolly, and there should be no
silky hair about the poll or elsewhere. The coat should not be too long,
so as not to give the dog a shaggy appearance, but at the same time it
Bhould show a marked and distinct difference all over from the smooth
species. This is the Fox Terrier Club’s description of the coat, and I
have nothing to add to it, except perhaps “ Stonehenge’s ” remark about
the necessity for plenty of undercoat.

The great thing is to get wire-haired terriers small enough, for they
ofEend more in this respect at present than do the smooth ones. We
must remember, however, that mere weight doeB not constitute size, and﻿'ramp (brother to Old Jerry) out of Venom—Dam Wasp,﻿﻿The Wire-haired Fox Terrier.

305

that show condition means at least l£lb. more than working condition.
It must also be remembered that a somewhat oversized terrier can often-
times be of service, while he is able to get along when the small one
must be led or carried. The writer has seen a dog running with the
Cleveland hounds that would certainly weigh close on 191bs., and he was
generally able to do all that was required, while he could really make
his way unaided either with or on the line of the hounds.

“ The Sporting Dictionary ” says :	“ With every established pack of

foxhounds there is seldom to be seen less than a brace of terriers; and
for the best of reasons, one is generally larger and stronger than the other ;
in a small earth where one cannot enter the other may.”

So, then, it is apparent our grandfathers did not wholly discard a dog
that could not always follow his fox, if they knew he would be generally
able to do so; but they supplemented him with a smaller one, whose draw-
back would be inability to go the pace.

It must not be thought for a moment that this chapter advocates large
terriers. On the contrary, there can be no doubt that the ideal dog is one
who can follow his fox anywhere, and yet has size and speed enough to
enable him to get over the ground ; but it would be somewhat unfair to
sweep the larger ones off the face of the earth, provided always, they
are not like the majority of wire-haired terriers of the present day,
large beyond all reason.

Measurements of—

Mr. Arthur H. Easten’B wire-haired Twister: Age, 1 year and 5
months ; weight, 221b.; height at shoulder, 13£in. ; length from nose to
set on of tail, 26£in.; length of tail, 4in.; girth of chest, 21£in. ; girth
of loin, 18iin.; girth of head, 13iin.; girth of forearm, 5£in.; length of
head from ocoiput to tip of nose, 7£in. ; girth of muzzle midway between
eyes and tip of nose, 6£in.

Mr. J. W. Comer’s Chance: Weight, 191b.; height at shoulder, 14in.;
length from nose to set on of tail, 28in. ; length of tail, 4|in.; girth of
chest, 20£in.; girth of loin, 17in. ; girth of head, 12in. ; girth of arm,
4Jin.; girth of forearm, 3|in.; length of head from ocoiput to tip of
nose, 7£in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of noBe, 7£in. ;
colour, white body, lightly marked badger tan on head.﻿3°6

British Dogs.

Chapter XIX.—THE DANDIE DINMONT
TERRIER.

By Corsincon.

“ First, touching Dandies, let us consider with some degree of scientific
strictness what a Dandie specially is.” The consideration of this question
:—of what a Dandie Dinmont terrier specially is—has been undertaken
by numbers of his ardent admirers, often with a zeal which has overrun
knowledge, and with a disregard to that scientific strictness which is
guided by facts and forbids the play of imagination, refusing to accept
evidence not clearly established, merely because it happens to chime in
With interests, prejudices, or preconceived notions.

Had Sir Walter Scott not written “Guy Mannering” there would
never have been a breed of dogs known aB Dandie Dinmont terriers ; had
he not created for us that big, burly, honest Liddesdale farmer, with his
terriers and his grows, what an unknown quantity of temper would have
been directed into other channels, and what fountains of printer’s ink
would have been saved ! There is no class of fanciers so quick to take
up a quarrel, or who would fight it out with such tenacity, as those who
affect the Dandie; they Beem to partake strongly of the pugnacious
character of their pets, and, being mostly Scotchmen or Border men, are
always ready to “ argue the point.”

I know a great number of men, that I am very pleased to call my
friends, whose enthusiasm on Dandie Dinmont subjects is bo intense that
were it not that they are so cool headed, reasonable, and shrewd in
dealing with all other topics, lunatico vnquirendo would naturally ooour
to the mind; with many it is only necessary to whisper Harry or Sir
Douglas in their ear to produce a similar effect to shaking a red rag be-
fore a mad bull; not being quite free from the taint myself, I can speak
the more freely of a weakness that has characterised in a special manner
a large proportion of Dandie Dinmont fanciers. Time and mutnal
gatherings at shows and elsewhere has, however, brought the opinions
of all nearer together.﻿﻿﻿The Dandie Dinmont Terrier.

307

The fact is, in my opinion, we have claimed too mnch for the dog ;
enthusiasm has idealised him, and strong desire has created good qualities
as inherent and never wanting in the breed, but which are not always
found. It is a mistake to claim for every Dandie all the best attributes
of a terrier; as a class there is no dog more game, and with gameness
they generally possess considerable intelligence and tractability ; but I
have known Dandies of the bluest blood that were worth very little.
Although, Bpeaking broadly, as a terrier he is unexcelled ; a good speci-
men has all the courage and perseverance of the bull terrier, and is under
far better control, and in comparison with his cousin, the Bedlington,
his temper alone gives him the palm. I think no one can reasonably
objeot to my speaking of the Bedlington as a relation of the Dandie—
the two breeds have so many points in common that it appears to me
impossible to ignore their relationship.

Another point much insisted on is absolute purity of descent from
Dandie Dinmont’s dogs—well, I confess myself a sceptic, and I think this
has been made too much of. I have little faith in the absolute purity of
any specimen living, and I must add I think it a matter of very little
consequence ; there is abundanoe of proof that the very great bulk of our
Dandies have at least a large proportion of the blood of Mr. Davidson’s
terriers in them, but to suppose that they have been kept absolutely free
from crosses, whether occurring by accident or design, is to take up with
the improbable. When the Dandie Dinmont terrier stud book is
compiled we may have more light thrown on this subject, but I confess
I have little faith in many of the oral traditions on which we are asked
to place implicit confidence.

I have a letter before me in whioh the writer says he was, when a boy,
on the most intimate terms with Hugh Purves, one of the few who had
dogs direct from Charlieshope, and assisted in keeping up the old breed ;
and my correspondent says that Purves more than once used a brindled
bull terrier to his Dandie bitches, and I think it is rather unreasonable
to ask us to believe that the Dandie of the day is absolutely, and without
the slightest admixture, descended from Pepper and Tar.

The Dandie Dinmont Terrier Club have drawn up a standard of points,
and if a dog agrees with that standard, possessing all the points required,
it is of little consequence whether his ancestors were whelped at Ellwan
foot or in Coaly Newcastle. Purity must, in speaking of dogs, always

i2﻿3°8

British Dogs.

be used comparatively ; there is not a single breed in existence worth a
Spratt’s biscuit that can claim absolute purity. We have got them to
their present state of high development by careful selection and judicious
crossings, and it should be quite sufficient for us to know that there are
hundreds of Dandies now living that are to all intents and purposes pure
bred, in so far as they have at least more or less of the blood of Dandie
Dinmont’s Mustards and Peppers, and have the recognised characteristics
of the breed so fixed in themselves as to be depended on to reproduce the
same with almost absolute faithfulness. Much as has been written anent
Dandie Dinmont terriers, that much has for the most part been in
ephemeral form, chiefly in the various contributions to the controversies
on the subject that have been raised from time to time in the newspapers
(notably in the “Field” and the “Country”), and a good deal of in-
formation and many valuable opinions are therein met with.

The Rev. J. C. Macdona was, I believe, the first to give publicity to
the following unquestionably important document, which he met with in
researches he made some ten or twelve years ago into the early history of
the breed ; it is described as being in the handwriting of James David-
son, with his initials attached, written on old hand-made letter paper,
yellow with years and bearing all the evidences of being genuine. The
memorandum was originally sent by Mr. Davidson to the Hon. George
H. Bailie, of Mellerstain, and is as follows :—

“ 1800.

“ Tuggin, from A. Armstrong, reddish and wiry.

Tarr, reddish and wiry-haired, a bitch.

Pepper, shaggy and light, Mr. Brown, of Bonjedward.

The race of Dandies are bred from the two last. “ J. D.”

Mr. James Scott, of Newstead, who contributed much useful inform-
ation respecting the breed in the correspondence on the subject in
the “Field ” some years back, speaking from a personal knowledge of
“ Dandie Dinmont ” and his dogs, says he had two varieties of terriers,
one large and leggy, the other short on the fore leg and small, and that
it was only the latter that Davidson would allow to be called Dandie
Dinmonts, and it has been assumed that these smaller terriers were the
produce of the two dogs, Pepper and Tarr, given to him by Dr. Brown, of
Bonjedward. When Sir Walter Scott made Davidson’s Pepper and﻿The Dandie Dinmont Terrier.

309

Mustard terriers famous there was at once, we may fairly assume, a
pretty general desire to possess the breed, and it is hardly likely the demand
would or could be supplied from this single pair, and as Pepper and Tarr
must have had relations more or less close in consanguinity, these would
probably be used to swell the family circle of the Dandies, and in support
of the supposition that we have living specimens directly descended from
Pepper and Tarr without admixture of blood more or less foreign, even
if we could be quite sure Dandie Dinmont himself stuck rigidly to the
Pepper and Tarr blood (and after they became so public he would probably
do his best to breed to one standard or type) I know of the existence
of no proof that dogs distributed by him throughout the country were by
their several owners bred to others of the same blood. Is it not reason-
able to suppose that the produce of a terrier bitch of another strain
sent to a dog known to be from Hindlee would be called Dandie’s or of
Dandie Dinmont’s strain, just as before the advent of dog shows and
the care which has of late years been bestowed on pedigrees, a sportsman
who had bred from a pointer dog of Earl Sefton’s would describe the
produce as of the Sefton strain P

I conceive much more has been done to secure to us the correct article
to-day by those breeders who, some of them having personal knowledge
of Davidson’s own dogs, sticking as close as they could breed to the
type, and selecting on occasion, even without a knowledge of its pedigree,
a dog that bore the family character, than by others who lay too muoh stress
on pedigrees which cannot be proved with any degree of certainty. Take,
for instance, Shamrock, one of the subjects of our illustrations. His
pedigree in the Kennel Club Stud Book gives his dam as Yic, bred by
Mr. W. Johnstone, by a dog of good blood belonging to an officer at the
Purshill Barracks. Here we have in one of the best known and best
dogB of the day a break in the pedigree before we go back two genera-
tions. No doubt Mr. Johnstone felt satisfied he was using a dog of good
blood because he possessed the characteristics of a good Dandie, but
there is no proof that he was of pure breed, and so we find breaks in the
chain between every existing dog and those two given to Dandie Dinmont
by Dr. Brown, of Bonjedward.

It would be needless to recapitulate the names of all of the earlier breeders
who followed the originator of this strain. James Scott, of Newstead,
Stodd&rt, of Selkirk, Douglass, of Cessford, Somner, of Kelso, with a﻿3io

British Dogs.

number of others, were among the earlier breeders, and the Duke of
Buccleuch has kept up the breed, but I do not know with what degree
of purity. Nicol Milne, of Faldonside, has had the breed for about half
a century, and for many years E. Bradshaw Smith, of Blackwood House,
has owned a large and important kennel, but whether he had authenticated
pedigrees with those dogs with which he commenced his kennel, I am unable
to say, or even whether a careful register of the produce of the kennels
has been kept, if so, it does not appear to be available for public use,
or even to the Dandie Dinmont Club, of which Mr. Smith is vice-president,
if I may judge from a duplicate of pedigree of my own dog, furnished me
by Mr. W. Foster, who is compiling the Dandie Dinmont Terrier Stud
Book, for, going back through Mr. Pool’s Dirk to Mr. Smith’s Pepper and
Jennie II., there is not merely a hiatus, but a full stop.

Although Mr. Davidson fixed the character of these dogs for us, it has
never been said of him that he created the breed, and how they were
first produced must remain a matter of speculation ; but that he is a
manufactured article, and not a true terrier, I think there can be no
doubt, and no theory I have heard broached seems to me to have so
much evidence in favour of its correctness as that of “Stonehenge,”
given in his book “ The Dog,” published in 1859, namely, a cross with
a low-legged Scotch terrier with the otter hound or rough harrier. The
Dandie Dinmont muzzle is too massive and square for a terrier, and in
that feature, and unmistakably in the size, shape, and set on of his ears
and the carriage of his stern he shows the hound cross.

I will go further, and say—although I know I shall be considered a
schismatic for venturing to express such a heterodox opinion—a judicious
infusion of foreign blood would be a good thing for the breed, if of no
other use than to check the tremendous mortality among puppies of which
nearly all breeders complain, and for this purpose there is no dog so well
suited in shape and style as the rough-coated La Vendee hound, a hand-
some specimen of which was shown a few years ago by Dr. Seton—he
was long and low with immense bone, head, ears, eye, muzzle, stern,
coat, and colour fairly corresponding to the Dandie, and as to disparity
of size, that would be quickly set right by selection.

If we come to consider the points and qualities, physical and moral, of
the Dandie breed generally, all are now pretty well agreed, although hair
splitters still wrangle over a pound in weight, the exact texture of tho﻿The Dandie Dinmont Terrier.

311

coat, the colour of a claw, the evidence for or against parity, of a light spot
on the palate or some such triviality. But the clnb formed some
years ago for the special pnrpose of taking this breed nnder its fostering
wing have, by deciding on a standard of excellence, from which there are
few or no dissidents, except on minor and verbal matters, earned the
thanks of all lovers of the breed, and whether so publicly stated or
not, Dandies have been virtually judged by that standard at all late
shows ; and although this cannot—fortunately, I think—ensure identity
of opinion, it does ensure general concurrence on essential points,
and has told and will continue to tell on the improved general
character of the classes of these dogs at our shows ; and I think, when
“ Idstone” publishes another edition of his book, he will see the need for
altering his opinion as therein expressed, that “the points of the Dandie
are an open question, and I doubt if any ‘authorities’ can settle it.”
So much has the public discussion of the breed and the action of the
olub done that it has become an impossibility for two public judges at
our largest shows to write, as Mr. Charles Collins and Mr. Matthias
Smith did ten years ago, that ‘ ‘ the Dandie Dinmonts north of the Tweed
are long-backed to strange deformity, legs shorter than any other breed
(not excepting the dachshund of Germany), faces as long as crocodiles and
jaws as strong, small pig-like eyes, ears small and erect (one may fall
over at the tip), coat not very long, but hard and erect as bristles from
top to toe. This is a Dandie.” Well might Mr. Bradshaw Smith write
of this effusion, “ such a description of this beautiful animal is enough
to mak auld Dandie Dinmont himsel loup oot o’ his grave.”

Had Mr. Collins’s description not been written seriously, but as a
caricature, it would have been excellent.

The character of the Dandie as a vermin dog is first rate ; ho is plucky,
keen, and resolute, and at the same time easier kept under command
than some other breeds ; and the graphio terms in which Scott, in “ Guy
Mannering,” speaks of him in this capacity still holds good, for, when
“ regularly entered, first wi’ rattans, then wi’ stots or weasels, and then
wi’ the tods and brocks, they fear naething that ever cam’ wi’ a hairy
Bkin on’t.” They also, when trained, make excellent rabbiters, and can
stand any amount of fatigue, although not so lissome on very rough
ground as lighter and more leggy terriers.

As companion and house dogs I like them very much. They are quick﻿312

British Dogs.

and watchful in the house, and, although they are not a beautiful variety
of dog, or to be compared in symmetry with the fox terrier and some others,
they possess a most distinct and unmistakable character that separates
them, even to the eye of the least observant, from the ‘ ‘ common herd,’ ’ and
their quaintness and great sagacity amply made up for lack of beauty.

The following description of the general appearance and special points
of this dog were drawn up by Mr. W. Wardlaw Eeid and myself, from
the written opinions of members of the clubs and other old breeders and
fanciers.

In forming an opinion of a dog’s merits, the general appearance (by
which is meant the impression which a dog makes as a whole on the eye
of the judge) should be first considered. Secondly should be noticed
the dog’a size, shape, and make, i.e., its proportions in the relation they
bear to each other ; no point should be so much in excess of the others
as to destroy the general symmetry, and cause the dog to appear deformed
or interfere with its usefulness in the occupations for which it is specially
adapted. Thirdly, the dog’s style, carriage, gait, temperament, and each
of its other points should bo considered separately.

Point 1. General appearance. The general appearance of the Dandie
Dinmont terrier is that of a rough-coated, thick-set dog, very low on its
legs, and having a body very flexible and long in proportion to its
height; but broad, deep-chested, and compact. The head very large,
with broad and well-domed skull, covered with light coloured hair of a
softer and more silky texture than that on the body. This hairy scalp
very often gives the head an appearance of being disproportionate to the
body, when such is not actually the case. Jaws long and slightly taper-
ing to the nose, which must be large and always black ; covered with
shorter and slightly harder hair than on the body. Neck thick and
muscular ; shoulders low, and back slightly curved down behind them,
with a corresponding arch of the loins, which are broad and strong.
Ears pendulous, and bearing low. Legs short and very muscular. The
Dandie carries in his countenance the appearance of great determination,
strength, and activity, with a constant and vigilant eagerness to be busy.
In brief, he is an embodiment of docility, courage, strength, intelligence,
and alertness.

Point 2. The head should be large, and rather heavy looking in
proportion to the dog’s size. Skull broad between the ears, with a very﻿The Dandie Dinmont Terrier.

313

gradual and slight taper towards the eyes. It should be long from back
to front, with high forehead and cranium conical and well domed,
measuring about the same from the point of the eye to back of skull as
it does between the base of ears; and round the largest part about a
third more than the dog’s height at the shoulder. The head should
always be covered with soft silky hair, not curled, but slightly wavy, and
not confined to a mere top-knot; it is also of a much lighter colour than
that on the body. The cheeks, starting from the ears, proportionately
broad with the skull, should, without any unsightly bulge, taper very
gradually towards the muzzle, the muscles showing extraordinary de-
velopment, more especially those that move the lower jaw. The head of
the bitch, as in nearly every other breed of dogs, is comparatively
smaller and lighter in proportion to that of the dog.

Point 3. The muzzle should be long, deep, and very powerful; very
slightly tapering to the nose, which should be large, well formed, well
spread over the muzzle, and always black. The muzzle should measure
from the comer of the eye to the tip of the nose about 3in. in length, or
hi proportion to length of skull as three is to five, aud round close in
front of the eyes, about two and a half to three times its length. The
muzzle should be thinly covered with short and hardish hair of rather
darker colour than on the body; the top of muzzle should be nearly
bare for about an inch from the black part of the nose, coming to a point
towards the eye. A foxey or snipey muzzle is very objectionable. The
jaws should be long and powerful, with very strong teeth, perfectly
level in front, the canines should fit well into each other so as to
give the greatest available holding and punishing powor. A pig-jawed
or undershot mouth is very objectionable, though, as it occurs in
the purest strains, it cannot be altogether considered a disqualification.
The mouth should be very large and the roof of it very dark, almost
always black.

Point 4. The eyes should be wide apart, large, round, moderately full,
very clear, bright, and expressive of great intelligence, set low, and
well in front of forehead. Colour, a rich brown or hazel, yellowness
being a great fault. Frequently they have a dark ring round the eye,
the hair of which is rather short and of a downy nature. This dark
shade, together with that (already referred to) down the centre of the
nose, contrasts beautifully with the bright silvery top-knot, and imparts﻿British Dogs.

3H

to them that gipsy, game, and genuine appearance which is an essential
characteristic in the Dandie.

Point 5. The ears should be large and pendulous, from 3£in. to 4in.
long, set far apart, well back, and rather low on the skull, hanging close
to the cheeks, like a hound’s or beagle’s, but a little more pointed or
almond-shaped, i.e., broad at the base, and tapering to a small rounded
point. The taper should be all, or nearly all, on the back edge, the front
edge hanging nearly straight down from its junction with the head to the
tip. They ought to show a little shoulder at the base, which causes the
tips of the ears to point a little forwards towards the jaw. They should
be moderately thick and leathery, and covered with a short, soft, darker
and brighter sort of hair than on the body, having a smooth velvety
appearance, showing no lint or silky hair, excepting in some cases a thin
feather of lighter hair starting about an inch or so from the tip, and of
the same colour and texture as the top-knot; this gives the top of the
ear the appearance of a distinct point.

Point 6. The neck should be rather short, and very muscular, well-
developed, and strong, showing great power by being well set into the
shoulder. The length of neck should average about one-third of its
girth.

Point 7. The body should be very long and flexible, measuring from
top of shoulders to root of tail about an inch or two over one and a half
times the height of dog at shoulder. Chest well developed and broad,
with brisket round and deep, being well let down between the fore legs.
The back should be rather low at the shoulders, and slightly curved
down behind them, with a corresponding arch, the rise commencing about
2in. behind the shoulder blade ; over the loins, which should be higher
than the shoulders, broad and strong, with a slight gradual droop from
the top of loins to root of tail. Ribs well sprung and rounded, back and
front, forming a good barrel. Both sides of spine should be well supplied
with muscle ; in fact, every part of the dog seems to be abundantly
supplied with muscle, giving it great compactness.

Point 8. The tail (or stern) Bhould be in length a little less than the
height of the dog at the shoulder. It should be set on at the bottom of
a gentle slope about 2in. from top of loins, being rather thick at the
root, getting very slightly thicker for about 4in., then tapering ofE to a
fine point. It should be covered on the upper side with wiry hair, of﻿The Dandie Dinmont Terrier.

3X5

darker colour and stronger nature than that on the body, while the under
side is lighter and less wiry, with a little nice light feather, commencing
about 2in. from root, and from lin. to 2in. long, getting shorter as it
nears the tip, which is pointed. It should be carried gaily, or hound-
like, slightly curved upward, but not directly curled over the back.
N.B. When not excited nearly in a horizontal line, but otherwise hound-
like.

Point 9. The legs. The fore-legs should be very short in proportion to
the dog’s size, very Btout, and set wide apart, thick, and straight, with
immense muscular development in the fore-arm; this, with the ankles
being very slightly turned inwards, makes the dog appear somewhat
bandy-legged, but the leg bones themselves should be stout and straight,
and not ourved. The feet should be well framed and broad, but not flat,
standing firm, and well under the chest, with very little or no feather on
the legs. Hind legs thick and strong, longer than the fore-legs, well
spread, with a good bend in the hocks, the muscles of the thighs being
very thick and well developed; the feet are much smaller, with no feather
or dew-claws. The toes rather short, net hare footed. The claws black,
and very strong. White claws, however, should not be a disqualification.

Point 10. Size. Height from 8in. to 12in. at top of shoulder, but never
above 12in., even for a dog. Weight: Dogs, from 161b. to 241b.; bitches,
from 141b. to 201b. The most desirable weight, 201b. for dogs and 161b.
for bitches, but 241b. dogs are very useful to give bone, muscle, and
stamina to the produce of the smaller ones.

Point 11. The coat. This is a very important feature. The hair
(about 2in. long) along the top of the neck and upper part of the body
should be a mixture of about two-thirds, rather hard (but not wiry), with
one-third soft, linty, not silky hair, which gives a sort of orisp feeling to
the hand, and constitutes what old John Stoddart used to term “a pily
coat.” It becomes lighter in oolour and finer in texture as it nears the
lower part of the body and legs. The head is covered with hair of a
longer, lighter, and much more Bilky texture, giving it a silvery appear-
ance, but not so long as to hang completely over the eyes like a Skye or
poodle. The lighter in oolour and softer the better.

Point 12. The oolour, either mustard or pepper, and their mixtures.
Mustard is a reddish or sandy brown of various Bhades. Pepper is a
bluish grey, either dark in shade, ranging from a dark bluish black to﻿316

British Dogs.

slaty grey, or even a much paler or silvery grey ; sometimes a combina-
tion of both, in which case the back is grey, while the legs, inside of ears,
chest, and under side of tail are mustard, verging on a pale red or fawn
colour. No other colours admitted, and any white, even on chest, is
objectionable.

The subjects of our engravings are Grip and Shamrock. Mr. W.
Wardlaw Eeid’s well-known Grip, a very compact and muscular dog, a
true and excellent specimen of the breed, and one likely to leave his
mark on the Dandie Dinmonts of the future, judging from the specimens
of his pups we have seen. He was bred by the Rev. S. Tenison Mosse,
and is a grandson of the old patriarch and champion Dandie Shamrock,
Grip has also, as will be seen, a strain of Mr. Nichol Milne’s celebrated
Old Jock, and is the son of Mr. E. Bradshaw Smith’s Dirk, known as
■“the incomparable Dirk,” a son of Mr. Smith’s Pepper, a dog that, on
account of his fighting proclivities, received the appellation of ‘ ‘ Peter the
Murderer.”

Shamrock has been longer before the public than any other Dandie,
and is acknowledged one of the best ever shown. The following are the
pedigrees of the two :

Pedigree of Grip.—Grip, sire Dirk (known as “the incomparable
Dirk”), by Pepper: (known as “ the murderer ”) out of Jenny, all bred
by Mr. E. Bradshaw Smith, Blackwood House, Ecclefechan. Grip’s dam
was the Rev. S. Tenison Mosse’s Schann II. by Shamrock out of Nettle.

Pedigree of Shamrock.—Shamrock, by Mr. Hodge’s Mustard out of
Broadwith’s Yic, bred by Mr. W. Johnstone, by a dog of good blood be-
longing to an officer at the Purshill Barracks, out of Johnstone’s Maud
by Miss Mather’s Spice, out of J. Scott’s Wasp, by E. B. Smith’s dog
out of Scott’s Little Spice, by his Brandy out of Johnstone’s Spice, by
Sir G. Douglas’s Pepper out of Mr. Brisbane’s Nettle ; Mustard by Mr.
Scott’s (of Newstead) Pepper out of Boyd’s Nettle, by Sir F. Douglas’s
Pepper II. out of Scott’s Vixen, by Brisbane’s Pepper out of his Spice,
bred by Mr. D. M'Dougall, of Cessford (celebrated for his pure breed) ;
Pepper by Brisbane’s Demon out of Nettle, bred at Kirkmichael; Demon
by Friar Tuck out of John Reed’s Pepper ; Pepper n. by Sir G.
Douglas’s Pepper I. (bred by the Duke of Buccleuch, and descended
from Old John Stoddard’s blood) out of Schann, descended from Stod-
dard’s Old Schann and Dandie; Scott’s Pepper, sire of Mustard, was by﻿﻿﻿The Dandie Dinmont Terrier.

317

Scott’b Brandy ont of his Jezabel, by bis Wasp out of his Bess, by Sir
G. Douglas’s Pepper (bred by Mr. Taylor) out of Scott’s Mustard;
Wasp by Scott’s Pepper out of his Vic; Brandy by Dr. Brown’s Puck
out of Scott’s Wasp, by bis Dandie out of his Nettle, by Duke of
Buccleucb’s Dandie out of his Ringlet; Puck by Henry Dodd’s Pepper
out of his Pepper.

The following are weights and measurements of celebrated Dandie
Dinmont terriers :

Mr. C. F. Henderson’s Bob Boy : Age, 4 years and 5 months ; weight,
211b.; height at shoulder, 10£in.; length from nose to set on of tail,
29in. ; length of tail, 8in.; girth of chest, 19in.; girth of loin, 15in. ;
girth of head, 14in.; girth of forearm, 5£in.; length of head from
occiput to tip of nose, 8in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 8^in.

Mr. Joseph Finchett’s Buffs: Age, 15 months; weight, 191b.; height
at shoulder, llin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 27in. ; length of
tail, 10in.; girth of chest, 18in. ; girth of loin, 14£in. ; girth of head,
13£in.; girth of forearm, 5in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
7 Jin-; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8iu.;
colour, pepper.

Mr. Joseph Finchett’s Cleg: Age, about 2$ years; weight, 171b.;
height at shoulder, lOin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 26in.;
length of tail, 7in ; girth of chest, 17in.; girth of loin (being in milk
impossible to ascertain); girth of head, 12in.; girth of forearm, 4£in.;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 7in.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 7in. ; colour, pepper.

Mr. W. E. Jackson’s Bessie Bell: Weight, 221b.; height at shoulder,
llin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 28£in.; length of tail, 9in.;
girth of chest, 19£in.; girth of loin, 15in.; girth of head, 13£in.; girth
of arm, 4iin.; girth of forearm, 5^in.; length of head from occiput
to tip of nose, 8in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 7iin.

Mr. J. Heritage’s Venture : Weight, 20£lb. ; height at shoulder, 10£in.;
length from nose to set on of tail, 30in. ; length of tail, 9in.; girth of
ohest, 18$in. ; girth of loin, 15in.; girth of head, 14in.; girth of arm,
5£in.; girth of forearm, 4£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 8in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in.﻿British Dogs.

3t8

Mr. H. Nicholson’s Vic: Weight, 181b.; height at shoulder, llin. ;
length from nose to set on of tail, 32in.; length of tail, lOin.; girth of
chest, 19in.; girth of loin, 15in.; girth of head, 13in. ; girth' of arm,
6in.; girth of forearm, 4Jin.; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 7Jin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in.

Mr. E. C. It. Goff’s Whiskey : Weight, 21Jlb.; height at shoulder,
lOin. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 28in.; length of tail, 9 Jin. ;
length of ear, 4in. ; girth of chest, 19in. ; girth of loin, 16in.; girth of
head, 14in.; girth of arm, 3in. ; girth of forearm, 4in.; length of head
from occiput to tip of nose, 8in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes
and tip of nose, 6Jin.

Chapter XX.—THE BEDLINGTON TERRIER.

By Corsincon.

The Bedlington terrier had a hard struggle to obtain from dog show
committees that recognition to which he is so well entitled. He has,
however, now gained his true position among modern terriers, and there
are very few schedules issued that do not provide prizes for this breed.

As will be seen from the statements of the writers I quote, the Bed-
lington has long been a distinct breed, the strain from which the modern
specimens have sprang having been peculiar to the district for at least
thirty years before the name Bedlington was applied to them, the first
dog so called being Mr. Ainsley’s Young Piper, whelped about the year
1825.

The following, which appeared in the “ Newcastle Chroniole,” 24th
July, 1872, gives a fair' statement of facts respecting this breed, and is
valuable as embodying the opinions of the late Mr. Thomas John Pickett,
well known to exhibitors generally under his soubriquet of the Duke of
Bedlington—a title earned by his great success as a breeder and exhibitor
of these terriers:—“ Of the breed of dogs for which this locality is
noted, none has caused so much controversy as the Bedlington terrier,
who is, I believe, the last new-comer amongst recognised breeds exhibited﻿The Bedlington Terrier.

319

at the shows. Indeed, a furious controversy has been raging as to
whether the strain is deserving of recognition as a fixed and well-defined
breed at all, and some of our south country friends have made fun of
the question ‘ What is a Bedlington terrier ? ’ To this query the best
answer that can be given is that furnished by perhaps the most successful
exhibitor of the present day, Thomas John Pickett, of Grey-street, New-
castle-upon-Tyne, who says : ‘ The Bedlington is a light-made, wiry dog,
with a bright, alert bearing, and whose cut and demeanour is indicative of
fire and resolution. The head should be high and rather narrow, and
when looked at from behind should be almost wedge-shaped; it should
be surmounted with a fine silky tuft, and this with the ears and tail
should, in the blue sort, be of a much darker shade of colour than the
body. The eyes should be small and a little sunken, and the jaw long,
quiokly tapering, and muscular. The ears should be long, should hang
close to the cheek, and should be slightly feathered at the tip, whilst the
neok should be long and muscular, and should rise well away from widely-
set shoulder blades. The legs should be rather high, and should be
straight, hard, and sinewy. The body should be compact and well
formed. The tail should be small, from 8in. to 12in. long, and slightly
feathered. The coat should be rather wiry, and the colour blue-black,
sandy, or liver. The dark blue dogs should have black noses ; the liver
or sandy are most approved of with flesh or cherry-coloured noses, but I
would not object to a sandy dog with a black nose if from the blue strain.’

“ Although the Bedlington terrier is only a new comer, I think he has a
great future before him with regard to popularity and esteem. The breed
can well afford to depend upon its merits to push its way to the front, and
the more well-bred specimens get spread about, in the greater demand will
the dog most assuredly be. The Bedlington, I take it, is a farmer’s friend, or
a country gentleman’s companion. No breed of terrier can compare with
him for stamina, fire, courage, and resolution. He will knock about all
day with his master, busy as a bee at foxes, rabbits, or otters; and at
night, when any other sort of dog would be stiff, sore, and utterly jaded,
he will turn up bright as a new shilling, and ready for any game going.
He takes to the water readily, has a capital nose, is most intelligent and
lively, and, as I have said, as a rough and ready friend about the fields
and woods he has no equal.

“ Despite the vast body of evidence adduced to dear up the question﻿320

British Dogs.

of the origin of this cross, I hold that the matter may yet be regarded
as by no means satisfactorily determined. I have seen pedigrees of
crack dogs of the breed extending over a period of 100 years, but then
one has no means of knowing what the dog was like whose name we
see figuring as having lived in the last century. No doubt some
famous dogs of the breed of old Northumberland terriers were long ago
located about Thropton, Rothbury, Felton, and Alnwiok, and it is not at
all unlikely that the Staffordshire nailmakers, who, some eighty or ninety
years ago, were brought down from the south and employed at Bedlington,
crossed the pure-bred native terrier with some of the stook they brought
with them, having, probably, fighting purposes in view. But it does not
matter how this clever and undoubtedly useful race has been produced; it
is sufficient to know that we have it, and that it is as permanent and
breeds as truly as any other cross we know of. At the same time,
if the Staffordshire nailmakers made the cross with the intention of
breeding a fighting animal, they failed, so far as raising up an antagonist
to the bull-terrier is concerned. The Bedlington is as tenacious,
as resolute, and as indifferent to rough usage as the professional
gladiator he was pitted against; but he lacks the formidable jaw and
the immense power of the bull-terrier, and the combat is emphatically
no part of his business.

“ The first show of Bedlingtons I can call to mind was got up by
Henry Wardle, of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, a good judge, and an ardent
admirer of the canine species. That show took place on 12th April,
1870, and the first prize was won by Thomas John Piokett, with
Tip, a thorough game one, but I thought he had a dash of bull in
him. I would like to do justice to the ability and care displayed in those
early show days of the Bedlington by Thomas Thompson, of Wideopen,
and Joseph Ainsley, of Bedlington, who stood foremost as reliable judges
of the Btrain, and as acknowledged depositories of almost all that was
known concerning it, but I have not space at command to enter into the
intricacies of pedigrees, and I must hasten on to mention two or three of
the most famous prize takers of the race. Mr. Pickett, who has bred
Bedlingtons since 1844, has now three champions, who will often be
referred to by breeders in after times, namely, Tear’em, Tyne, and Tyne-
side, all descended from Thomas Thompson’s strain, and inheriting
pedigrees of portentous length. Tyne was first shown at the Crystal﻿MR. J. CORNFORTH’S BEDLINGTON TERRIER “NEWCASTLE LAD” (K.C.S.B
Sire Mr. Liddell*s Tip—Dam Mr. Morris's Sut.﻿﻿The Bedlington Terrier.

321

Palace show in 1870, and went thence to Birmingham, where she was
again not noticed; she was then sent to Manchester, but, from some
mistake of the railway servants, was never taken out of her hamper. At
Liverpool, to which show she was sent on, a similar mistake occurred;
but the committee of the show becoming aware of the fact, sent Mr.
Pickett a special prize. Despite this series of rebuffs, Mr. Pickett
forwarded Tyne to the Glasgow show, when the judges pronounced her
not to be a Bedlington at all. The ‘ Scotsman ’ of 2nd March, 1872,
however, in its notice of the show, remarked that she was by a very
long way the best in the class in which she was exhibited. This was
a case of doctors differing with a vengeance; and Tyne managed to
stultify the Glasgow decision by making a round of brilliant victories
at York, Kendal, Bedlington, Blaydon, Seaton Burn, and other dis-
trict shows, and won twice at Durham—viz., in 1870 and 1871—finally
visiting the great Crystal Palace exhibition of 1872, and taking first
prize in her class, which the ‘Times,’ of 2nd June, 1872, described as
the best collection of Bedlingtons ever exhibited at any show. Tear-’em
is the hero of the original show at Bedlington in 1870, where, in a class
of fifty-two competitors—a number that has never been exceeded sinoe
—he was awarded first prize. Tyneside, a beautiful blue bitch, fault-
less in shape, coat, and colour, was placed first in a class of twenty-
five at Bedlington in 1871; but in the Bedlington show of 1872, this
distinguished branch of the family obtained its greatest triumph—Tyne
(own Bister to Tear-’em) being placed first, with Tear-’em second, and
Tyneside third, in a class of twenty-three entries. I have been supplied
with a pedigree of Tyneside for six generations back, but the limited
space at my disposal prevents my giving it here. It may, however, be
stated that she is inbred to a most curious extent, the name of Hutchin-
son’s Tip occurring no less than five times in the course of her pedigree,
while on the part of both sire and dam she is descended from such grand
dogs as Bagille’s Piper, Thompson’s Jean, Bum’s Twig, Jos. Shevill’s
Jean, Thompson’s Boa Alley Tip, and Bagille’s Nimble, &o. The dimen-
sions of Tyneside are as follows : From lugs to tip of nose, 8in.; length
of tail, lliin.; length of lugs, 5£in. ; breadth (tapering off in a filbert
Bhape), 3in.; height from the olaw to the shoulder blade, 14iin.; weight,
201b.; size round the chest, 19£in. ; and fore arm, 7£in. So much for
the Bedlingtons, and in taking leave of the race I may mention that most

T﻿32.2

British Dogs.

of them known to me are terribly inbred, and that the usual conse-
quences often follow ; also that many of them exhale an odour which, to
say the least of it, is peculiar.”

The following quotation from a letter on the subjeot, by Mr. W. J.
Donkin, secretary of the Bedlington Terrier Club, is in some points con-
firmatory of the above, and throws some additional light on the history
of the breed. He says :

“ During the first quarter of the present century, Mr. Edward Donkin,
of Flotterton—still dear to the. old sportsmen of Coquetside by the
familiar soubriquet of c Hunting Ned ’—hunted a pack of foxhounds
well known in the Rothbury district. At that time he possessed two
very celebrated kennel terriers, called Peachum and Pincher. A colony
of sporting nailors from Staffordshire then flourished at Bedlington
(a village situated about twelve miles north from Newcastle), who
were noted for their plucky breed of terriers. But reform was
at hand, and the old favourites were obliged to make way for new
blood. To Joseph Ainsley, a mason by trade, belongs this honour. He
purchased a dog named Peachum from Mr. Cowen, of Bock Law, and the
result of a union of this dog with Mr. Christopher Dixon’s Phoebe, of
Longhorsley, was Piper, belonging to James Anderson, of Rothbury
Forest. Piper was a dog of slender build, about 15in. high, and 151b.
weight. He was of a liver colour, the hair being a sort of hard
woolly lint, his ears were large, hung close to his cheeks, and were
slightly feathered at the tip. In the year 1820, Mr. Howe, of Alnwick,
visited a friend at Bedlington, and brought with him a terrier bitch
named Phoebe, which he left with Mr. Edward Coates, of the Vicarage.
Phoebe belonged to Mr. Andrew Riddle, of Framlington, who subse-
quently made a present of her to AinBley; but from the fact of her home
being at the Vicarage she was generally known as Coates’s Phoebe. Her
colour was black, with sort of branded legs, and she had a light-coloured
tuft of hair on her head. She was about 13in. high and weighed 141b.
In 1825 she was mated with Anderson’s Piper, and the fruit of this union
was the Bedlington terrier in question, Mr. Ainsley being the first to
nlaim that title for his dog Piper. Of the sagacity and courage of Piper,
one of their offspring, a volume might be written.

“ The Bedlington terrier is fast, and whether on land or water is equally
at home. In appetite these dogs are dainty, and they seldom fatten,﻿The Bedlington Terrier.

323

bat experience has shown them to be wiry, enduring, and in courage
equal to the bulldog. They will face almost anything, and some queer
storieB could be told about them ; they will seize a burning paper ; and
Mr. Thos. Wheatley, of Newcastle, had a dog that carried a red hot
poker in its mouth, the mouth after having much the same smell as when
putting a new shoe on a horse’s foot. The dog mentioned was a very
little one, and was greatly in-bred. To their other good qualities may
be added their marked intelligence and hostility to vermin of all kinds.
They will encounter the otter, fox, or badger with the greatest determina-
tion.”

The same writer, I may observe, in common with most fanciers of the
breed, claims for them a pedigree going back to 1792 ; but it is quite
clear from the above statement that an admixture of terrier blood from
Staffordshire was introduced, and the colour of the Alnwick bitch bred
from by Ainsley goes to show she was not in that point at least what we
now recognise a Bedlington to be. The evidence, written and traditional,
is, however, conclusive that a terrier of a distinct type had, prior to that,
been recognised as peculiar to the district, and the infusion of a strain of
foreign blood, although it might modify, would probably not greatly alter
the original type.

In respect to the character of the Bedlington, I have been converted
from a prejudice against him to a very strong feeling in his favour, and
that by fairly studying the breed and finding that two, the only dogs of
the breed I have owned, were all their most ardent admirers claim for
them. I have found them easily kept nnder command, a remarkably
lively and cheerful dog, with plenty of “ go ” in them, capital at vermin,
showing plenty of courage and bottom, receiving punishment in silence
and returning it with interest; handsome I cannot say I think them, but
they possess a style, and are stamped with character which removes them
from any suspicion of mongrelism. I have found them first-class water
dogs, and most intelligent, obedient, and useful as house guards and com-
panions. In none of the specimens I have had to do with have I
observed the disagreeable odour referred to by the writer in the “ New-
castle Chronicle,” quoted above.

In general appearanoe the Bedlington is somewhat leggy and flat-
sided, but useful, active, and hardy looking. It is a praotice very
oommonly indulged in to pluck the hair from the face and muzzle. Dogs﻿324

British Dogs.

thus trimmed looking cleaner and longer in the jaw; this is so commonly
done that it seems to be accepted by judges as a matter of course, but
it is better to discountenance faking, even in its mildest forms, and I
think a trimmed dog should be penalised. The tail also often comes in
for a share of the faker’s art.

The following are the points adopted by the Bedlington Terrier Club.
I must say I do not think the comparison of the Bedlington’s head to
that of a ferret a correct or happy one, in other respects the description
may be accepted as authoritative :

“ Head. The head rather resembles the ferret, and though wedge-
shaped, like most terriers, should be shorter in the skull and longer in
the jaw, and narrow or lean muzzled; it should be a narrow, high
skull, coned or peaked at the occiput, and taper away sharply to the
nose.

“ Ears. They should be filbert-shaped, lie close to the cheek, and are
set on low like a Dandie, thus leaving the head clear and flat, and the
ears should be feathered at the tips.

“ Eyes. In blue, or blue and tan, the eyes have an amber shade ; in
livers, &c., it is much lighter, and is commonly called the ‘hazel eye.’
It should be small, well sunk into the head, and placed very close
together ; very piercing when roused.

“ Jaw and Teeth. The jaw should be long, lean, and powerful. Most
of these dogs are a little ‘ shot ’ at the upper jaw, and are often termed
‘ pig-jawed.’ Many prefer what is called ‘ pincer-jaw,’ that is, the
teeth should meet evenly together, but it is not very often they are
found that way; the teeth should be large, regular, and white.

“Nose. The nose or nostrils should be large, and stand out promi-
nently from the jaw. Blue or blue and tans have black noses, and livers,
&c., red or flesh coloured noses.

“Neck and Shoulders. The neck long and muscular, rising gradually
from the shoulders to the head. The shoulder is flat and light, and set
much like the greyhound’s. The height at the shoulder is less than at
the haunch. More or less this is the case with all dogs, but is very
pronounced with this breed, especially in bitches.

“Body, Bibs, Back, Loins, Quarters, and Chest. A moderately long
body, rather flat ribs, short straight back, slightly arched tight and
muscular loins, just a little ‘ clicked ’ up in the flank, fully developed﻿The Bedlington Terrier.

325

quarters, widish and deep chest; the whole showing a fine muscular
development.

“ Legs and Feet. Legs perfectly straight and moderately long; the
feet should be rather large, that is a distinguishing mark of the breed ;
long claws are also admired.

“ Coat. This is the principal point on which fanciers differ; some
prefer a hard wiry coat, which several of the south-country judges ‘ go
in ’ for, but the proper hair of these dogs is linty or woolly, with a very
slight sprinkling of wire hairs, and this is still the fancy of the majority
of north-country breeders.

“Colour. The original colours of this breed of dogs were blue and tan,
livers, and sandies, and these are still the favourite colours of the old
breeders. The tan of these dogs is of a pale colour, and differs greatly
from the tan of the black and tan English terriers, and the blues
should be a proper blue linty, not nearly black, which is sometimes seen
now. In all colours the crown of the head should be linty or nearly
white, otherwise white is objectionable.

“Tail. The tail should be of moderate length (8in. to 10in.), either
straight or slightly curved, carried low, and feathered underneath. The
tail should by no means be curled or carried high on to the back.

“Weight. The weight of these dogs varies greatly, but the average
is from 181b. to 231b., or at outside about 251b. weight.”

The table on the following pages is a well-authenticated pedigree of
Lieut.-Col. John A. Cowan’s Bedlington Terrier Ask ’im II., going
back to the year 1782, for which I am indebted to the courtesy of
the owner.

I believe suoh an extended pedigree of a dog of any breed has never
before been published.﻿JOHN A. COWEN’S ASK ’IM IL, BLUE AND TAN, PUPPED 18

326

British Dogs.

o﻿The Bedlington Terrier.

327


—fcg—

-lift

£33

Of*

|l

i

II

Sg

'll﻿328

British Dogs.

The following are weights and measurements of several good specimens
of the breed:

Mr. E. L. Batty’s Matt (K.C.S.B., 5580) ; Age, 7 years 5 months ;
weight, 211b. ; height at shoulder, 14fin.; length from nose to set on
of tail, 30jin.; length of tail, 10£in.; girth of chest, 19£in.; girth of
loin, 15in.; girth of head, llin.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 6£in.,
girth of leg lin. below elbow, 5in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 8jin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 6£in.;
colour and markings, dark liver, with wiry coat and light linty crown.

Mr. E. L. Batty’s Tov/ng Topsy (K.C.S.B., 6682): Age, 4 years 11 months;
weight, 211b.; height at shoulder, 14fin. ; length from nose to set on of
tail, 30jin.; length of tail, llin.; girth of chest, 19in.; girth of loin;
14in.; girth of head, llin.; girth of arm, lin. above elbow, 5fin.;
girth of leg lin. below elbow, 4fin.; length of head from ocoiput to tip
of nose, 8£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
6in.; colour and markings, sandy or light liver.

Mr. John Parker’s Tyneside II. : Age, 2 years 9 months ; weight, 221b. ;
height at shoulder, 14£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 31£in.;
length of tail, llin.; girth of chest, 19£in.; girth of loin, 15in. ; girth
of head, 12in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 7£in.; girth of leg lin.
below elbow, 5iin.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 8£in. ;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in.; colour and
markings, blue.

Chapter XXI.—THE BLACK AND TAN TERRIER.

By Corsincon.

As far back as the history of British dogs goes we have mention of the
terrier, the dog that went to earth after fox and badger, and by
“ conceaved fear drove them out of their hollow harbours.”

I have written of them in the past tense, for in the multitudinous
varieties now called terriers there are many altogether unfitted for the
work which gave the breed the generic name.

Justice compels me to say the modern black and tan, after the refining﻿MR. HOWARD MAPPLEBECK’S BLACK AND TAN BITCH “NETTLE” (K.C.S.B.﻿﻿The Black and Tan Terrier.

329

processes of the Manchester and Birmingham showmen, is one of those
that would make but a poor figure at underground work. The legs
and feet are too slender and elegant for digging, and their satin-like coat
is not the sort of covering in which to face wet grass and dank woods.

Whilst on the subject of the coats of terriers I must notice a rather
curious and, I think, altogether erroneous supposition of Touatt’s on the
subject. He says, “ the rough terrier possibly obtained his shaggy coat
from the cur, and the smooth terrier may derive his from the hound.”
The cur he elsewhere describes as a cross between the sheepdog and the
terrier, but there are rough-coated as well as smooth-coated hounds, and
the terrier was placed by Caius among the hounds, between the harrier
and the bloodhound in fact, and he states him to be the “ smallest of the
kind called Sagax.” Now, if there always have been hounds, both
smooth and rough, it is surely quite as likely there have also always been
Bmooth and rough terriers.

Caius says nothing about the length of coat or the colour of his
terriers. Daniels, in his “ Rural Sports,” makes special mention of the
elegant and sprightly smooth-coated terrier, black in body and tanned
on the legs ; and in foxhound kennels of the last and early in this century
terriers of all colours were kept—red ones, brindled, brown pied, white
pied, pure white and black with tanned faces, flank, feet, and legs, and
all of these were kept for work, not for show—work requiring the
strength, fortitude, ardour, and indomitable pluck of a genuine terrier,
for a working terrier worthy of the name should be as “hard as nails,”
aotive as a cat, and lively as a cricket.

The old style of black and tan terrier was stronger but not so elegantly
built as his modern representative, and still we may occasionally see the
Btouter-limbed, broader-chested, thicker-headed, and coarser-coated dog
that illustrates the original from which our show dog has sprung.

Dog Bhows have, no doubt, had much to do with transforming the
rather “ cloddy ” rough-and-tumble blaok and tan into the graceful and
refined animal of our show benches; and noted among breeders who
had a large share in producing this dog of the day stands the name of
the late Mr. Sam Handley, who in the earlier years of dog shows success-
fully exhibited, and became generally recognised as the greatest authority
and most expert judge of this breed especially, although also of many
other varieties in which he took an interest.﻿330

British Dogs.

I do not know that any cross has been resorted to in bringing this
terrier up to the mark, but the great length of head, the tendency to
show a tucked-up flank, and a something in the general contour gives one
the impression that greyhound blood is in them, and if so, it was
probably obtained through the whippet. The skull is oertainly muoh
narrower in proportion to length and to size of dog than in the grey-
hound, and rumour says this end is obtained by continued compression
with wet bandages during puppyhood.

With improved elegance of form was introduced gradually a finer coat
and richer and more decided contrast in the colours, and when Nature
is not so kind as desired in this respect, some of the votaries of the
breed assist her.

I believe, however, that staining, dyeing, and painting is not much
resorted to now-a-days; careful breeding has done so much towards
perfecting the dog that there is less need to introduce low tricks, which
cannot be too severely censured.

Although the modern black and tan terrier is unfitted for the hard
rough work at which his progenitor was an adept, it must not be inferred
from anything I have said that he is a useless dog—he is, on the contrary,
game enough and death to vermin, as all the terrier tribe are, but he is
simply not fitted to stand rough weather. He is also a remarkably
active and cheerful companion, and makes a first-rate house dog, being
generally quite free from any objectionable smell, and he does not
harbour fleas, nor carry the dirt on wet days into the house, as rough-
coated dogs do.

The black and tan is sometimes called the Manchester terrier, but
there is no sound reason for it ; this I pointed out in an article on the
breed, which I contributed to “Dogs of the British Islands,” and made
it a cause of complaint against the Kennel Club that in their stud
books they gave countenance to this misnomer ; and I see in the volume
of their “Stud Book” since issued the entries of these dogs are not
called Manchester, but simply black and tan terriers, and this is as
it should be, for far more good ones have been bred out of Manchester
than in it, and the dog is really an old English terrier.

There is considerable difficulty in breeding dogs with all the desirable
points, and when a specimen is found nearing perfection in shape, colour,
and markings, very long prices are given for it.﻿The Black and Tan Terrier.

331

Another point (of course, artificial, yet great stress is laid on it), is
the cutting of the ears—unless this is what is euphonistically and most
erroneously called artistically done, it mars the chance of an otherwise
firBt-rate dog winning.

This is a custom I most strongly deprecate, and I hope to see it done
away with, as it has been in the case of pugs, Dalmatians, and others.
Whether it improves the dog’s appearance is a matter of opinion; I
think it does not, and I do not think without better reasons than
I have ever heard given we are justified, for a mere whim or fancy, in
exposing to all weathers one of the most delicate organs of the body,
which nature has specially protected, thus leaving the poor beast easily
Liable to ear canker, deafness, and other evils. The following are the
points required in a first-rate specimen :

The head must be long and narrow, clean cut, tight skinned, with no
bulging out at the cheeks ; the skull flat and narrow.

The muzzle should be long, lean, and tapering, with the teeth level, or
the incisors of the upper jaw just closing over the under ones. The nose
must be quite black.

The eyes are black, bright, and small, neither Bunk in the skull nor
protruding.

The ears are, for exhibition purposes, invariably cut, and much impor-
tance is attached to the result of this operation. It is required that the
ears correspond exaotly in shape and position with each other. They
must be tapered to a point, stand quite erect, or slightly lean towards
each other at the tip. This is a practice I strongly deprecate, and never
miss an opportunity of protesting against; and I believe there is a
general feeling arising against it. Among others who strongly condemned
it I may name the late Mr. S. Handley. The supporters of the practice
oannot offer a single valid argument in its favour, whilst there are many
Btrong reasons against it. It is sheer nonsense to say the dogs look
better cropped. It is not many years since people thought pugs looked
better with their earB shorn off by the roots, but nobody thinks so now ;
and the practice as regards terriers could be effectually stopped by a
resolution of the Kennel Club to the effeot that no dog with cut ears
would be eligible to compete at any of their shows after 1879. There is
this practical evil, too, in cropping, that it places the dog with naturally
defective earB on an equality in competition with the dog bom with﻿332

British Dogs.

perfect ears, if they have been equally skilfully manipulated. The
natural ear is of three kinds—the button or drop ear, like the fox
terrier; the rose ear, that is half folded back, so that the interior of the
ear can be partially seen ; and the prick or tulip ear. But I have never
seen the last-named kind, except in coarse specimens. The leather of
the ear is thin, and generally finest in the best bred dogs.

.The neck must be light and airy, well proportioned to the head, and
gradually swelling towards the shoulders; there should be no loose
skin or throatiness. The shoulders are not so muscular as in some
breeds, but nicely sloping.

The chest must be deep, but not wide; the latter would indicate a
bull cross, which would also be shown in the head and other points. The
body is short, the ribs rather deep than round, the back ones pretty
well let down.

The loins are strong and muscular; with this formation there is an
absence of the cut-up flank which the whippet and Italian greyhound
crosses give.

The legs are straight, light of bone, clean as a racehorse’s, and the feet
long, with the toes well arched, and the claws jet black.

The coat must be short and close; it should look fine and glossy, but
not soft in texture.

The colour and markings are in this breed—which is now essentially
a fancy dog—important. No other colour than black and tan or red is
permissible, the least speck of white is fatal to winning ohances, and it is
in the richness, contrast, and correct distribution of these that excellence
consists. The black should be intense and jet-like, the tan a rich warm
mahogany ; the two colours in all points where they meet being abruptly
separated—not running into each other. On the head the tan runs
along each jaw, on the lower jaw running down almost to the throat ; a
bright spot on the cheek, and another above the eye, each clearly sur-
rounded with black, and well defined; the inside of the ears slightly
tanned, spots of tan on each side of the breast, the forelegs tanned up to
the knee; feet tanned, but the knuckles with a clear black line, called
the “pencil mark,” up their ridge ; and in the centre of the tan, midway
between the foot and the knee, there must be a black spot called the
“ thumb mark,” and the denser the black, and the clearer in its outline,
the more it is valued. The insides of the hind legs are tanned, and also﻿﻿﻿The Black and Tan Terrier.

333

the under side of tail; but tan on the thighs and outside, where it often
appears in a straggling way, producing the appearance called “bronzed,”
is very objectionable. The vent has also a tan spot, but it should
be no larger than can be well covered by the tail when pressed down
on it.

The tail must be long, straight, thiu, and tapering to a point. Its
carriage should be low, and any curl over the back is a great defect.

The symmetry of this dog is of great importance, as this point is
developed to as great an extent as in any other breed, not even except-
ing the greyhound.

The subjects of our engravings are Mr. F. W. Parry’s Saff, acknow-
ledged by most judges to be the best bitch of the breed living. Saff is
perfection in symmetry, possesses all the points of the breed, and is
remarkably rich in colour. In the engraving the head is depicted as
carried rather high ; in a lower position the neck would have shown to
greater advantage, but, on the whole, Mr. Moore has most successfully
portrayed Saff, who well represents the breed.

Our other engraving represents Mr. Howard Mapplebeck’s (now Mr.
Yicary’s) Wasp, a good specimen, and fairly successful in the show
ring.

The following will show size and dimensions of a few good specimens :

Mr. F. W. Parry’s Saff: Age, 2 years 9 months; weight, 19£lb.;
height at shoulder, 15in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 24in.;
length of tail, 9in. ; girth of chest, 20in.; girth of loin, 15£in.; girth of
head, llin. ; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 6|in. ; girth of leg lin.
below elbow, 4$in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 7fin.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 64in.; colour and
markings, black and tan.

Mr. W. K. Taunton’s Swift (K.C.S.B., 8631) : Age, 2 years ; weight,
241b.; height at shoulder, 16in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 27in. ;
length of tail, 9in. ; girth of chest, 21in. ; girth of loin, 16in.; girth of
head, 13in.; girth of leg lin. below elbow, 5in.; length of head from
occiput to tip of nose, 7|in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 6}in.

Mr. W. K. Taunton’s Black Bess (K.C.S.B., 8635): Age, 2 years ;
weight, 16Jlb.; height at shoulder, 13in. ; length from nose to set on of
tail, 25in.; length of tail, 8in. ; girth of chest, 17£in.; girth of loin,﻿334

British Dogs.

13in. ; girth of head, llin.; girth of leg lin. below elbow, 4£in. ; length
of head from occiput to tip of nose, 7£in. ; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 5fin.

Mr. W. K. Taunton’s Stella, by General (K.C.S.B., 2943)—Saff II.
(K.C.S.B., 3024) : Age, 2 years and 2 months ; weight, 181b.; height at
shoulder, 14£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 26in. ; length of
tail, 72in.; girth of chest, 19Jin. ; girth of loin, 15£in.; girth of head,
ll^in.; girth of leg lin. below elbow, 4£in. ; length of head from
occiput to tip of nose, 7in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 6in.


Chapter XXII.—THE SKYE TERRIER.

By Corsincon.

For several years past this game little dog and favourite pet has been
much discussed in newspapers dealing with canine subjects. I am
anxious that the views of each party should be fairly represented in
“ British Dogs,” and with that view I consider it best they should speak
for themselves.

This necessitates making the article on Skye terriers rather longer
than I desired, but in the interests of fair play I can see no other plan
to follow. I will, therefore, make my own remarks as brief as possible,
whilst I feel compelled, from the position I have assumed, not to pass the
opposing opinions over in silence.

Engravings of the three types advocated are also given, which will
assist in elucidating the opinions expressed.

I will first give the opinions of those who advocate the stamp of dog
represented by the woodcut of “ Gareloch,” which may be called the
Roseneath type.

It is most unfortunate, in my opinion, that those who espouse this type
should not be content with advocating its excellencies, but decry all
others with a wantonness and inattention to striot accuracy most
damaging to their own cause.﻿MR. F. H. VICARY’S PRICK EARED SKYE TERRIER “MONARCH” (K.C.S.B. O691).
Sire Mr. Thompson's Tommy—Dam Mr. Cunningham's Queen Bess.﻿﻿The Skye Terrier.

335

They have, in correspondence which has been dragged through
numerous newspapers, insisted that the dogs obtaining prizes at English
dog shows have coats of soft silky texture. To make this statement is to
show gross ignorance of facts, or wilfully to write that which is untrue.
A dog with a soft silky coat, or of “ Berlin wool ” texture, may occa-
sionally have won, judges not being infallible ; but to say that English
judges, by preferring soft-coated Syke terriers encourage mongrels, is
altogether unsustainable by facts, and soft silky-coated dogs are now but
rarely seen in a Skye terrier olass. In June, 1879, I acted as judge at
Exeter show, when, to my astonishment, there was a olass of some ten or
twelve, and every one hard-coated, and when we come to the principal
prize winners at all good shows it is the same. Her Majesty the
Queen’b Toddy, Gretton’s Sam, Pratt’s Piper, Haggis, and others of his
kennel, Brooke’s Warlock, Pike’s Oscar, Cunningham’s Monarch and
Venus, Locke’s Perkie, and many more I could name are all remarkable
for the hardness of the exterior coat.

Another objection taken to the prize winners is the length of the coat.

Prize winning Skye terriers in England are not regularly worked,, and
some of them not at all; if they were, every practical man knows their
coats would soon be short enough ; but the issuers of the manifesto I am
about to quote insist that the length of coat could not be attained
without crossing with a naturally longer haired variety. In this they
answer themselves by stating that the Roseneath strain has a coat two-
thirds longer than the original, and say this result has been obtained by
“ systematic breeding by selection.” Just so the dogs prized in England
may have obtained their long coats, and with prize dogs there have been
other influences at work tending to the production of long coats—the
constant attention to combing and brushing alone stimulates and
increases the growth 0f	and attention to health and cleanliness

keeps the dogs from scratching and breaking the hair. When the reader
comes to Mr. John Flinn’s able contribution, he will, however, find that
although short-coated terriers may long have existed in the Western
Highlands, very long-coated terriers were peculiar to these parts over
300 yearB ago.

Another objection taken to prize dogs, and strongly urged by the party
I am now referring to, is that their owners give no account of their
pedigree, or how or from whom they originally obtained the strain.﻿336

British Dogs.

I do not care to characterise this as I think it should be characterised,
the facts being that several great prize winners, of whom I may mention
Mr. J. Pratt and Mr. Duncan Cunningham as examples, have, in the
only public records of canine pedigrees existing, proved their prize dogs
to be of long descent, whereas not one of the signatories to the manifesto
have ever published a pedigree of one of their dogs.

Another charge against prize-winning Skyes is want of courage and
ability to do the work of a terrier.

A more groundless statement could not be made, as I can testify from
practical experience; and men must surely be absolutely blinded by
prejudice who, by such reckless statements, would injure other people’s
property.

I will only further remark that the journal “ which need not be
named ” was The Country, of which I was Kennel editor, and that the
words attributed to me shows a lack of accuracy and candour on the part
of the quoter.

The manifesto is as follows :

“ The Skye terrier defined, as existing in the Western Isles and High-
lands of Scotland.

“ During the last three years a widespread agitation has been main-
tained in the columns of leading journals on sporting matters, with
reference to the question ‘ What constitutes a Skye terrier ? ’ and, how-
ever explicitly it has been demonstrated by gentlemen qualified to speak
as to facts that the breed belongs to the Western Isles and Highlands of
Scotland, and are essentially ‘ terriers,’ being utilised in the destruction
of all kinds of vermin to be met with in this country, strange to say,
Southern breeders, as a class, are strongly opposed to this view, on no
stronger ground, apparently, than it does not accord with their preconceived
notions about Skye terriers. In one journal (the name of which need not
be specified) a statement recently appeared from the pen of an editor
professedly well versed in canine matters, to the effect that the term
‘ Terrier ’ is not now restricted to its original meaning; but it would
have been more correct to say that the application of such term to dogs,
such as are generally exhibited in the Skye terrier class, is to ascribe a
meaning to the word ‘ Terrier ’ at variance with its derivation. The
same authority adds that Skye terriers have for many years been bred,
both north and south, for the drawing room rather than the otter’s﻿The Skye Terrier.

33 7

‘holt’ and the badger’s ‘earth,’ but this, if true at all, is only so in
a very limited sense, i.e., drawing-room pets are no donbt in vogue
throughout England and some districts of Sootland, but they are not
acknowledged in the Highlands as the native terrier, being neither bred
nor kept by admirers of the gallant little mountaineers. Probably the most
marked distinction between the old breed and the modern so-called Skye
terrier to be met with at exhibitions, is that of ‘ coat,’ which, on the
fanoy article, is frequently of a silky textnre, and ranging from eight
inohes to about a foot in length, while the true breed has wiry hair, and
rarely, if ever, exceeding in length one-third of the extreme limit above-
named.

“ Some theorists, who have been unable to shut their eyes to these
marked differences, have ascribed them to two causes, viz., the complete
change in the mode of life to which dogs are subjected in England,
coupled with the faot of a milder climate prevailing there than further
north. But if these views were not fallacious, it would follow that High-
land-bred terriers sent to England and reared there (many of them in the
lap of luxury) would themselves, or their produce, in course of time,
manifest a change of ooat in harmony with their reputed descendants (the
show animals). However, experience has shown beyond question that
the covering provided for the Skye terrier by ‘ Dame Nature ’ is not
liable to be influenced in its growth by external causes, or the habits of
life beooming more artificial. As a matter of faot, the Skye terrier proper,
whether lodged in the kennel, made a pet of in the drawing-room, or as
you please in this country, iB still a terrier, and not a substitute for a
door mat. We do not wish to imply that only Highland-bred Skyes are
genuine, but we submit that bond, fide lineal descendants of such, and
they alone, are entitled to be termed Skye terriers. We challenge
breeders of the popular show specimens to declare when, where, and from
whom in the Highlands the dogs were derived, from whom their present
show Skyes are alleged to have originated, and further, to enlighten the
publio by explaining to them how the modifications aB to ‘ coat,’ and
other points specified hereafter, are reconcilable with the statements
made that the breed had been maintained pur et simple. Suoh, then, is
the ground taken np by the subscribers, all of whom are familiar with the
terriers bred in the Western Isles and Highlands of Scotland, and known
there for at least eighty years as Skye terriers, the characteristics of

z﻿338

British Dogs.

which breed differ widely from those of the dogs which win, and have for
years wod, at shows held throughout England, as will be manifest from
the following detailed description of ‘ points.’ Such description is
declared by the subscribers hereto to be reliable and in all respects
strictly accurate :

“ Head. Medium size, muzzle shortish and rather broad, not ‘ snipey ’
like that of a fox. Jaws strong and well clad with musole. Average
length of head 7in., say, from end of nose to eyes 2£in., and from eyes to
back of skull, 4£in. Girth of muzzle in front of eyes about 7in., and
girth of head in front of ears from llin. to 12in. Jawbone about 4£in. in
length.

“ Eyes. Dark hazel colour, very expressive, and of moderate size,
overhung by bushy eyebrows, but never so as to obstruct the sight in the
slightest degree, differing in this respect very prominently from the dense
thatch (of hair) veiling face, muzzle, and even the nose of some of these
nondescript animals, which are favoured by canine judges (P) under the
erroneous idea (probably inspired by the door mat style of illustrations
given in Punch) that they are real Skye terriers. The vicinity of the
eyes, if disfigured by stains, would imply a poodle cross at no distant
date.

“Ears. Small, broad at the root, but tapering to a point. They
should be clad with soft hair, and slightly ‘ feathered,’ but anything
approaching the spaniel for ‘ feather ’ should be viewed with grave
suspicion. The drop-ear should not lie flat against the side of the head,
but drop towards the front. In the prick-eared variety the ears are
carried erect. A ‘slouch’ ear, i.e., the organ of hearing showing a
decided tendency to fall outwards, is considered objectionable. When
the dog is * at attention ’ the ears ought to stand firmly upright, but
when in a listless attitude the position of the ears is somewhat modified.
Length of ears from 2£in. to 3in., breadth at the root about 2iin., and
tapering to a point; while the spurious so-called Skye terriers are generally
distinguished by excessively coarse ears, almost rivalling those of a
donkey in size.

“ Neck. Should be strong and muscular, about 5in. long, and from 9
to 10$in. in girth.

‘ ‘ Body. Long in proportion to height of dog ; ohest and ribs deep,
body neither flat sided nor yet round like a barrel, as, on entering a den﻿The Skye Terrier.

339

or cairn, where the formation of the rock causes the opening to be
perpendicular, the dog gets easier through, and if the opening is
horizontal, a terrier instinctively endeavours to gain an entrance side-
ways, i.e., crawling on his side. Length from shoulder to root of tail,
say, from 15in. to 17in., girth behind foreleg 15in. to 16£in. Dog should
not be prominently ‘ tucked up ’ at the loins, but ou the contrary, well
ribbed home.

“ Legs. Should be short and strong, with plenty of muscle; they may be
slightly bandy, but the less the better. Hair on legs (like that on under-
part of body) softer in texture as well as lighter in colour than that on
the back of the dog. Foreleg 4£in. to 5in. in length, inside measurement,
girth almost equal to length, if the muscles are well developed.

“ Feet. Small, and more or less hairy. There should not be any dew-
claws, which are considered very objectionable in any terrier.

“ Tail. Short, and rather bushy, about 9in. long (hair inclusive), and
the nearer straight in carriage the better it looks. A long ‘ whiphandle ’
style of tail does not belong to the breed.

“Height. From 8in. to 9in. at shoulder, and should not be lower
behind.

‘ ‘ Coat. Should, on the body, be dense, and the outer (or longer
hair) of a decidedly wiry texture, that underneath being much finer in
quality.

“ In different strains the length of coat varies, but the pure-bred Skye
terrier never shows (within 5in. to 6in.) the extraordinary length of hair
on the back of some show dogs, nor can such unusual length of coat be
ascribed to any cause apart from cross breeding, to attain the distinc-
tion.

“ Dogs bred in the recognised best kennels in the Isle of Skye exhibit
hair on them measuring, say, about 3in., although apparently not above
half the length here indicated. While the strains most popular in the
‘ Argyle Country,’ bred for so many years at Inverary Castle, as well aB
in the Isle of Mull, and more recently at Boseneath, are generally longer
coated, perhaps to the extent of about 2in., a oiroumstance whioh can be
easily explained, without reference to ‘ differences of temperature ’ in the
localities named. In short, it may fairly be asoribed to the fact of
systematic breeding by selection, for moderately rough-coated terriers,
being pursued in Argyleshire.

z 2﻿340

British Dogs.

“ Colour. A matter of taste. In the Isle of Skye dark-grey is the
general colour of the breed, but there are also some very light-coloured
specimens, and others nearly black ; while the Skyes in Argyleshire are
chiefly reddish-yellow, with some darker hairs intermixed, If the dog is
of any light colour, a dark muzzle, with tips of ears and tail also dark,
should be considered a strong recommendation, as lending to the dog a
distinguished appearance. White on feet, breast, or any other part of
the dog should be regarded as a blemish.

“ Weight. Males from 121b. to 161b., females ranging about 31b. less.

“Value of Skye terrier points: “Head (number indicating relative
value), 15 ; jaws and teeth, 10 ; eyes, 5; ears, 5 ; body and neck, 25 ;
legs and feet, 15 ; tail (carriage of), 5; coat (texture of) and colour,
10 ; symmetry, 10.”

Here follow the signatures of twenty-two persons.

Mr. J. Gordon Murray’s contribution to our knowledge of the subject,
which I now propose to give, at least does credit to his industry and
his patriotism. Unfortunately his is not a judicial mind, the clan spirit
crops out, and shows the bias. In his advocacy of what he calls the
“ very real and pure Skye terrier,” he reminds me of the anecdote of the
two Scottish dames who were discussing the prospeots of our arms on
the eve of a great battle, when one wound up with the pious exclamation
that she “ hoped Providence would be on the side of those who were
right,” when the other, showing the true national spirit, indignantly
exclaimed, “Houts, woman! let Providence be on our folks’ Bide, whether
they’re right or wrang.”

There is no praise too ridioulouBly fulsome, and no expression of
opinion too absurd in favour of his “ very real and pure,” which he
hesitates to entertain, or, at least, express.

The comparison of the dog with a retriever in his work, and the
statement that a dog 7in. to 9in. high at the shoulder could retrieve any
“quadruped” bigger than “ rat b and mice and such small deer” is an
injustice offered by Mr. J. G. Murray the partisan to J. G. Murray the
sportsman, which the latter does not deserve. Mr. Murray’s partisan-
ship also carries him aside from facts which should be known to hiin as
a frequent visitor at London and other large shows. He insinuates that
the winning dogs at such shows have coats soft in texture ; he says that
their heads are round and apple shaped, and the tail carried “ d la pug”﻿﻿﻿The Skye Terrier.

34i

whilst they have “almost no legs, and a caterpillar body’’—that is, an
excessively lengthy body. Every one of these statements are nntrue of
the principal winners at our best shows, for, although long in coat, it is
hard and coarse in texture, the carriage of the tail is low, and the pro-
portions of length of body to height at shoulder practically the same as
he and his friends of the “ manifesto ” lay down as correct—that is, the
length rather more than three times the height—their ideal of perfection
being to 1. I have not measured either Mr. Bead’s Boseneath
dog Garelock, or Mr. Murray’s Otter, but the illustrations* certainly give
one the impression that they are each of them very muoh shorter in
length than the written standard put forward by their admirers require,
and, having seen Otter in the flesh, that impression of him is strong
with me. In appearanoe, Otter has nothing but his decidedly “ varmint”
look to recommend him; he is decidedly ugly, and to ask fanciers of dogs
and lovers of the beautiful in these animals to give up the charming Skye
terriers, brought to their present perfection by oareful and judicious
breeding, and take in their place such a dog as Otter, or even Garelock, I
can only oonsider one of those ponderous things known as a “Scotch joke.’ ’
It is very easy to understand that a hardy rough terrier, with a
shortish wire coat, and something of the sort Mr. Murray describes,
would be kept for vermin hunting, and, as at one time was the case with
other breeds, their quality as workers considered almost entirely, and the
beauty of appearance almost ignored, but it has been proved in Skye
terriers, as in other breeds, that a beautiful exterior is quite consistent
with good working qualities, and has, in fact, been produced without
loss of hardihood, pluck, and endurance. That Borne of the prize Skyes
are capital workers, as also some of those bred from prize winners, I can
testify from experience of them, and when put to work the excessive
length of coat would not be long in the way. To ask us, however, to
change the coat of dogs principally kept for their beauty, one of the
great charms of the modern Skye, for the short harsh uncultivated one,
Buch as covers Otter, would be equivalent to ask the descendants of
Highland gentlemen settled in the south to give up all the advantages of
modem civilisation and oulture and betake themselves to the garb of a
Dunnieivassal of the last century ; but all this is giving Mr. Murray the

* The Illustration of Oarelock Is a fac-simlle, by a patent process, of a drawing by
Mr. Barron.﻿342

British Dogs.

benefit of bis assertion, that a short coat is the correct thing and the
original, which I do not grant.

The “Mogstads,” “Drynocks,” and “ Camusennaries, ” referred to
by Mr. Murray as “breeds,” would be more accurately described as
“strains” exhibiting those slight differences from others from the same
parent Btock which kennels quickly assume when bred within themselves.

Mr. J. Gordon Murray remarks :

“ There can be no doubt but the Highland terrier rendered important
services to our forefathers in assisting to destroy the large quantities of
vermin with which Scotland, but especially the northern part, was much
overrun a century ago or more. Being an animal posessed not only of
great courage and sagacity, but also of energy and hardihood, and being
of small size—seldom exceeding nine inches to ten in height, more fre-
quently under the latter—they were enabled to follow foxes, wild cats,
&c., into their dens and “homes ” in cairns, where no other breed of dog
could go—at least, such breeds as then existed in Scotland, to wit, the
sheepdog, deerhound, and bloodhound. Hence the “ Holt ” dog or High-
land terrier was in great requisition, and here I would beg to state that
there is no such name in the Gaelic language as Skye terrier. That name,
which has been such a bone of contention, is of very recent application,
and, as I shall endeavour to show as I proceed, is quite a misnomer when
applied to the modem show-going dog of that name.

“At one time many parts of Scotland were divided into districts, to each
district a foxhunter, with a few of these terriers and a crossbred dog or
two (something between the colley and blood or sleuth hound), was
appointed, whose duty it was to destroy, if possible, all the vermin on his
beat, which used to commit sad ravages on sheep, lambs, &c., and would,
even in open day, attack poultry and carry them off, so daring had they
become. I have read in an old agreement or lease a clause to the follow-
ing effect—that the tenant was to provide a certain number of men and
dogs for a specified time to assist in destroying the wild animals which
committed such injury on the property of landowners and tenants. I
have no proof that the terrier was used in the chase of boars or wolves,
but I think it is quite possible they may have been used to ‘ track ’
those gentlemen, just as we find at the present day in Lower Canada.
There is a small dog there not heavier than many of our fox terriers,
which is of great use in following the bear, and assists much in bringing﻿The Skye Terrier.

343

him to bay. Many gentlemen in the north of Scotland kept a pack of
terriers for otter hnnting, and some do so still; and many at the present
day use them for rabbit hnnting, at which sport no dog can equal them,
as they never get too excited, and are always ready to obey the commands
of their master. In close creeping ‘ whins ’ or ‘ furze ’ they will go
through the rabbit runs like ferrets, and Mr. Bunny is either obliged to
bolt or be killed. They are capable of being trained to retrieve, and it
is a very pretty thing to see one of these little dogs carrying a partridge,
woodcock, or snipe. They will take to the water like an otter, and
give excellent sport when flapper shooting. In fact, in my day I have
seen a great many, and used a few of the so-called retrievers ; but give
me a well-broken Highland terrier in preference to any retriever I
know, and if there is game to be had I should have little fear in losing a
wounded bird or quadruped if it kept above ground. I shall now give
the opinions of a few gentlemen well qualified, from a long experience of
the dog under discussion, to desoribe what a Skye or Highland terrier
should be, at the same time readers will observe that these ‘ opinions ’
were kindly furnished me in respect to a description of the animal I had
previously sent them being anxious to have the advice of the very best
living authorities on the breed.

“ I shall now quote a letter from Mr. M’lntyre, head keeper, Armadale,
Isle of Skye : ‘ Sir,—With reference to your letter of the 31st of October, I
beg to state that I am entirely of the opinion stated in your description,
except that in former days we thought more of the bandied legs than the
straight. As to the dog given to Argyle by the late lord, he was of what
was known in Skye as the ‘ Mogstad ’ breed of terriers, aB all his lord-
ship’s were got from the late Mr. M’ Donald, of Mogstad. As to the time
the long-haired dogs became common in Skye, I think it is about sixty
years since—a dog was landed from a French wreck, through which the
long-haired originated.’ I was aware previous to writing Mr. M’lntyre
that the Mogstad breed were held in very high repute in old times, and I
wrote to a gentleman in Skye, who holds a publio appointment there, to
obtain for me if he oould a description of them and others with which I
had reason to know he was well acquainted. This gentleman wrote as
follows: ‘ Dear Sir,—I am favoured with your letter anent the pure
breed of Skye terrierB, as also your description of the different points in
the right dogs, in the oorreotness of whioh I quite concur. The pure﻿344

British Dogs.

Skyes were of all colours except spotted, long in body, short bandy-
legged, strong wiry hair, from 3in. to 3£in. long—the creature looking
very small when wet. The long-coated Skyes are believed to be by all
experienced judges only a cross between the originally pure Skye and
some foreign long-haired breed, the first of which was supposed to have
landed off a wreck in Skye about sixty years ago, and the finest specimens
of those long-haired dogs seen for the last fifty years were the property
of Donald M’Leod, Esq., and were of a dark greyish colour, very long in
body, bandy-legged, and drop-eared.’

“ The Mogstad Skyes were of a dark greyish colour, with wiry hair, from
3in. to 32in. long, with body low but long, and measuring well in girth,
legs stout and short, and well provided with very strong claws ; the
greater part prick-eared, and all of them excellent workers.

“ The Drynocks are another very splendid breed of the original pure
Skyes, closely resembling the common Scotch seal in colour, short wiry
hair, with body of a medium size, a good deal like the Mogstads, and all
of them first-rate workers.

“ The Camusennaries are another famous breed of the very real and pure
Skye terriers, and derive their name from a wild and mountainous tract
of land in Skye, extending from Coirnisk on the west town or the Spar
Cave on the east. The breed were originally reared there by a Lieut.
Macmillan, long passed away/ the whole of them short wiry-haired, like
the aforenamed breeds; colour almost always dark all over, middle part
of hair in many instances grey, but again dark next the skin, no white
on feet or chest; a thin medium-sized prick ear, and very pointed; and
in every third or fourth litter a reddish-yellow one. This breed was
excelled by perhaps no others of pure Skyes in the kingdom in point of
courage, sense of smelling and readiness to work, in addition to many
other excellent qualities. They would retrieve from the water, and one
of these—a black, prick-eared dog, the property of the late J. Campbell,
Esq., Lochard, in Appin, and residing in Skye eighty years ago—would
follow the hounds for twelve hours over the steep and lofty Skye hills
till the fox was traced to his den, where, in many instances, he had to
succumb to this courageous and most powerful little dog, the exploits of
which will be long remembered in Skye. Another of the same breed,
black and prick-eared, the property of Mr. MTntyre, head gamekeeper to
the Lord M'Donald, has been known to break the jaw-bone of a full﻿The Skye Terrier.

345

grown fox and kill him. Some of the Camnsennaries have been known
to enter a pool of water three feet deep, enter a crevioe below the water,
and bolt an otter.

“The next letter is from a captain, late of the 42nd Highlanders,
residing in the Island of Mull: ‘ Sir,—Mr. G. (Enoch) has asked me to
give yon some information regarding a breed of Skye terriers kept by
the late Col. Campbell, of Enoch. I remember them when I was a boy,
now many years ago. They were generally of a dark grey colour, some
quite black when young, but used to turn blue and grey when some
two or three years old. There were also among his terriers some
reddish-brown, with dark muzzles; both colours equally good at all
sorts of vermin. They were kept pnrposely for otter-hunting, and no
dogs could beat them at that sport. Their coats were short, thick, and
wiry—no silky brutes among them; they were short-legged, and pretty
long in the body, but not much out of proportion; small, sunken eyes,
with very thick eyebrows; the ears were small, but not erect; their
tails were carried by them pretty high, with a slight curve. To the
best of my belief there is not one of the breed in Mull. A friend of
mine, a Capt. M'Donald, of Watemish, Skye, is one of the best
authorities on what a real Skye ought to be in all the highlands.
Should you apply to him, I am sure he would be glad to give all
information on the subject.’

“ I shall now give another quotation from the letter of another gallant
officer, residing in Skye, who used to keep a pack of these game little
dogs : “ Sir,—I have always heard that the long-haired fancy terriers
were the result of a cross from some Russian poodles, and not by any
means native. Your description of what I have and hold to be the real
original Skye working terrier is as near as possible correct. I had them
from dogs bred by Capt. Martin M‘Leod, Gesto ; Donald M'Askill, Rhue-
dunner; Donald M‘Leod, Esq., Eingsburgh; John M’Norman, Esq.,
Pyleahin. Pure, they are very scarce and rare, of late years have been
much crossed, and, in some instances, were spoilt by in-and-in breeding ;
but the chief reason has been the demand by visitors for anything in
the wool. I have only one dog alive now, as for many years I have
given up keeping a paok. I liked them, and those I gave them to had
the same value for them, as ‘very cool hands,’ onoe well entered. They
are perfeot for otters and foxes, never ‘ giving a oheep ’ till in grip—﻿346

British Dogs.

then look out ! Seldom twice mauled in a lifetime, almost always onoe ;
excellent noses (scent) and hardy feet, running all day on shore oaims
without complaining. One great virtue also is, they are kindly towards
each other, even when their blood is up.

“ Now, anyone who knows what Dandie Dinmonts (pure) are knows how
unsafe they are when roused ; or any cross with bull blood, how apt to
quarrel in a cairn. I think I have adduced sufficient evidence to prove,
what I shall presently show, is the proper description of the genuine
Skye. I might adduce a great deal more, but consider it would be
perfectly superfluous, considering the position of the gentleman supplying
the information and their long experiences of this most valuable terrier.
To begin, then, with head, it should be longish rather than round, muzzle
broad, not snipey, jaw strong and muscular. Eyes dark brown, not so
large or prominent as those of the Dandie, but they are very expressive
of determination and intelligence ; any watery stains near the eye
show a decided cross. Ears are V shaped, broad at the roots, but taper-
ing to a point; they are covered with short soft silky hair, not like the
body coat, which is hard or wiry. The drop ear should drop to the front,
and the prick-eared variety should stand erect and be entirely free of long
hair, either falling down or standing out like awns or barley corns. There
can be no doubt but dogs having the above appendages are more or less
crossed with some other breeds, and yet some I have seen on the show
bench, with this addition to their ears, were, in many other respects, very
good dogs. The dog Otter, of which an engraving is given, and to which
the artist has done full justice, is scarce eleven months old, and is de-
scended from the black wiry-haired Camusennaries on the dam’s side, and
the famous Mogstads on that of the sire, was bred at Armade, Skye, by
J. Shaw, Esq., who has made the pnre Skye a speciality for many years ;
and Otter has been pronounced by several eminent judges of the breed to
be all but faultless, and possessing the best head and ears, as a Skye
terrier, ever sent across the Border. Length of ear from 2£in. to 3in.
Neck strong and muscular, about 5in. long, and from 9in. to lOin. in
girth. Body, long in proportion to the dog’s height, but not by any
means a ‘ caterpillar ’ one; chest and ribs deep, body flat, not round.
This seems to be a great provision of nature, as these dogs, when forcing
their way into a bnrrow or den, can work as well lying on their sides as
on their bellies. Length from shoulder to root of tail, from 13in. to 17in.;﻿﻿﻿The Skye Terrier.

347

girth round chest, from 15in. to 16£in. ; tail, about 6in. or 7in. long,
slightly curved ; height will vary from 7£in. to 9£in. Legs should be
short, and well covered with muscle. Many of the breed are bandy-
legged, but some breeders prefer straight ones. The length of foreleg will
vary from 4in. to 5in. (inside measurement), and the girth of ditto
should be equal, or nearly so. A dog requires legs to walk and run upon,
also to scratch with ; hence a leg of, say, 3in. would be rather unsuitable
to a vermin terrier, though it might be much prized in the show ring.
Coat should be short, exceedingly thick, and wiry ; no curls—this
would show a cross. The best and most practical sportsmen with whom
I am acquainted prefer the coat not to exceed from 2£in. to 3in. or 3 2in.
in length, as a longer coat would very much impede the dog when work-
ing. This fact I have, and many others as well, practically tested, and
invariably found a long coat of, say, 6in., prove a great obstacle to a
terrier, either under the earth or above it. However, many try to obtain
as long a coat on their dogs as possible, especially those who keep them
for exhibition purposes, as English judges generally select a long coat,
which is entirely wrong, and is not a characteristic of the pure Skye or
Highland terrier, and a long coat greatly loses in density and hardness of
texture, giving the animal more the appearance of a Maltese terrier, from
which many of the so-called Skye terriers are, no doubt, descended. I
remember, many years ago, seeing in London ‘ white Skyes,’ which were
brought from Portree, and one of these was honoured with a prize at
an English show. The proper colour of a genuine Skye is either dark
grey, reddish yellow, or black, but if of a reddish colour, they ought
to have a dark muzzle and dark ear-tips; these are greatly valued by
gentlemen in the north. The weight of the Skye terrier may vary from
91b. to 121b. in females, and from 121b. to 161b. in males. However,
for my own ubo, I should like one about 141b. ; still, I would not be
particular to a pound or two in weight, were the other points of the
dog good; but any terrier over 181b. I should not much fanoy for
work. Now let us look at the generally accepted type of dog of this
breed selected for honours at shows by English judges, but whose
opinions should have little weight, for the simple reason that many of
these gentlemen, who are valued authorities on setters, retrievers, and
other breeds, know absolutely nothing of the Highland terrier, having
neither studied their points nor characteristics, nor used them at work;﻿348

British Dogs.

hence they have adopted the English popular fallacy with reference to this
breed, that it must have almost no legs, a caterpillar body, and a coat
which might be measured by the yard. The head of the show dog is
generally round or apple-shaped, with a great quantity of silky hair fall-
ing over and almost concealing his eyes, body exceedingly long, and a flag
as finely feathered as a setter’s, which he sometimes carries on one side
(a Id pug) or over his back, and he. may be of any weight from 141b.
to 231b.

“I may be told that lots of dogs, such as I have now described, are
bred at Portree, Paisley, Greenock, and Glasgow. This is unfortunately
too true, but they are nevertheless a cross-bred animal, and should be
placed in a class for ‘ fancy drop or prick-eared terriers.’ The Booner
they are relegated to this class the better, and would very shortly be if
the judges were gentlemen who had a thorough knowledge of the valuable
Highland terrier. For hardiness, gameness, faithfulness, and attachment
to their masters no dog excels the genuine Skye, and for sagacity they
are equalled by none. An elegant writer as well as a distinguished
sportsman remarks, speaking of this breed, ‘ he is almost human in his
love, and more than human in his fidelity.’ ”

I will now introduce to readers an article on the Skye terrier, written
by Mr. John Flinn, and with whose opinions I entirely concur. By
authoritative quotation Mr. Flinn shows conclusively that a long-haired
terrier was peculiar to the Northern Islands more than three centuries
ago—written history when dealing with such matters must be allowed to
be more reliable than tradition. Mr. Murray and his confreres of the
“ manifesto ” go back sixty or ninty years to find a wrecked vessel landing
dogs on the coast of Skye to account for the long-haired terrier, whilst
others go back to the wreck of one of the ships of the Spanish Armada.
This hypothetical foreign cur is sometimes called a French poodle, some-
times called a Spanish poodle, sometimes a Russian poodle, and at other
times it is described as a Maltese. That a dog was so landed on the Isle
of Skye is highly probable, and that Buch a dog or dogs would be crossed
with the native dogs is also highly probable, but, admitting that to be so,
there is no proof brought forward that the prize winning dogs of to-day
are the descendants of the cross, which is what Mr. Murray and his friend
have tried hard, using clamour and assertion as a substitute for argu-
ment, to establish, and have utterly failed to do. In all points but﻿The Skye Terrier.

349

length of coat, the facts are dead against them, as anyone may see who
will examine onr best prize Skye terriers at the London, Edinburgh, or
other first-class shows; and their assertions respecting the coat are
refuted by Mr. Flinn, who brings forward the writings of long established
authorities in support of his opinions. Dr. Cains wrote his book long
before the Spanish Armada was thought of, and since that lately most
rare work has been reproduced by the publishers of this book at a cheap
rate, it is within the reach of all to consult for themselves.*

I cannot help thinking that if the authors of the “manifesto” were
to give up fighting about a name, seeing that “ Skye terrier” is but a.
modern one after all, and establish classes for their hard short-haired
working terriers under the name of Highland terriers, they would be
doing practical good, instead of whioh such constant reiterations in praise
of a certain strain looks more like an advertisement than having the
good of the breed at heart.

Mr. John Flinn says : “ Early writers on natural history have not left
sufficient material to enable us to arrive at the origin of the different
breeds of terriers native to this oountry, consequently, we are left to
conjecture what it may have been, and this is all the more unsatisfactory
when we consider, as Darwin says, that ‘ a breed, like a dialect of a
language, can hardly be said to have a definite origin.’ Some theorists
assert that the Skye terrier and the Dandie Dinmont are both descended
from the original Scotch terrier ; but as the first-named appears to have
existed as a distinct breed as early as there is any mention of the Scotoh
terrier, it would be difficult to prove this assertion. The first mention
made of the Scotoh terrier is by the Bishop of Boss, who wrote in the
latter half of the sixteenth century, but his description is too meagre to
furnish data on whioh to base any argument as to its affinity to the other
breeds. He says, ‘ There is also another kind of scenting dog of low
height, indeed, but of bulkier body, whioh, creeping into subterraneous
burrows, routs out foxes, badgers, martens, and wild-cats from their
lurking-places and dens. Then if he at any time finds the passage too

in tbe U nluersitie of Cambridge. And newly drawne Into EnglUhe by Abraham Fleming,
Student. Natura etiam in brutis vim oetendit mam. Seene and allowed. Imprinted at
London by Rychard Johnes, and are to be soldo oner against S. Sepulchres Church
without Newgate. 1576. Reprinted verbatim, 1880. London: “ The Bazaar" Office,
170, Strand.﻿350

British Dogs.

narrow, opens himself a way with his feet, and that with so great labour
that he frequently perishes through his own exertions.’

“ No subsequent writer, until comparatively recent times, describes
the Scotch terrier with any minuteness ; but Caius, who wrote his work
on ‘ Englishe Dogges ’ a few years before the Bishop of Ross, mentions
Iseland ‘dogges,’ which, there can be little doubt, were of the same
breed as afterwards came to be known by the name of Skye terriers.
They were fashionable in his time as lap dogs, and were ‘ brought out of
barbarous borders from the uttermost countryes northwards,’ &c. ; and
* they,’ he says, ‘ by reason of the length of their heare, make show
neither of face nor body, and yet these curres, forsooth, because they are
so straunge, are greatly set by, esteemed, taken up, and made of, in room
of the spaniell gentle, or comforter.’ It would be vain to conjecture
whence this ‘ straunge ’ animal came, or when it first found a home in
the Western Islands, but it seems certain that it was there three
centuries ago. Once there, everything was favourable for its preserva-
tion as, or development into, a distinct breed. The sea forms a natural
barrier, which would prevent contamination, and the only influences
likely to effect any change in the characteristics of the dog would be
food, climate, and selection, unless other dogs were brought to the
island.

“ An incident did happen in 1588, as we are told, on the authority of
the Rev. J. Cumming Macdona, in Webb’s Book on the Dog, by which a
foreign blood was introduced amongst them. He informs us that the late
Lady Macdonald, of Armadale Castle, was possessed of an extraordinary
handsome strain of Skye terrier, which was descended from a cross of
some Spanish white dogs that were wrecked on the island at the time
when the Spanish Armada lost so many ships on the western coast. So
far as this particular strain is concerned, great care appears to have been
taken to keep it pure and distinct from the breed common in the island ;
however, other dogs may have found their way to Skye in a similar
manner, although there is no record of the fact. At the time when
Professor Low wrote, the distinctive features of the Skye terrier were
well marked. He says ‘ the terrierB of the Western Islands of Scotland
have long lank hair, almost trailing to the ground.’ There could not be
a happier description than this. There is no ambiguity about the length
of the coat, and the word ‘ lank ’ conveys the idea that it lay straight﻿The Skye Terrier.

351

and free, and, therefore, could not be soft or silky in texture. The coat
Professor Low described so many years ago as a feature of the terriers of
the Western Islands—he does not call them Skyes, as probably they were
not generally known by that name then—has always been and is still
considered the proper coat of the true Skye terrier. He also mentions a
terrier peculiar to the Central Highlands, and describes it as rough,
shaggy, and not unlike the older deerhounds in general form. Richardson
likewise mentions this dog, and says it is commonly called the Highland
terrier. A gentleman of high standing in the medical profession in
Edinburgh, and whose name is well-known in literature, informs me that
he remembers seeing terriers in the island of Skye resembling (miniature
deerhounds.’

“The fact that terriers, similar to those of the Central Highlands, but
probably with a slight admixture of Skye blood in them, were also bred
in the island of Mull, seems to have caused confusion in the minds of a
few people as to what really is a Skye terrier. The name of Skye
terrier is of comparatively recent application, and it was applied to the
terriers of the Western Islands of Scotland, which were covered with long
lank hair almost trailing to the ground. Richardson describes the Skye
as long in the body, low on the leg, and covered with very long hair ;
and he says the name was given ‘ from its being found in greatest perfec-
tion in the Western Isles of Scotland, and the island of Skye in particu-
lar.’ Any other name might have been given to this breed of terrier,
and had it been known by a different one it would be absurd to think of
changing it now. The dog for which the name has lately been claimed,
if not the Highland terrier itself, appears to be closely related to it, and
its being bred in Skye can change it into a Skye terrier in no other sense
than it would change a Dandie Dinmont into a Skye terrier if it were bred
there.

‘ ‘ The researches of naturalists prove that the covering of animals
adapts itself to the climate in which they are placed. Many examples
might be given to show that the coat Nature provides to quadrupeds
which have to endure cold and wet resembles that of the Skye terrier in
having an outer covering of hair and an inner coat of short wool. The
oolley may be taken aB one. There is no dog in this country so much
exposed during all weathers as the Scotch Bheepdog, and his coat, like
that of the Skye, is a combination of hard and soft hair. However great﻿352

British Dogs.

the advantage of the outer coat may be in throwing off the rain and sleet,
unless the dog were also provided with the inner coat, which not only
excludes the wet, but keeps him warm, he would be unable to withstand
the rigorous climate of the Scotch Highlands. The swine native to the
northern parts of Scotland were covered with short wool, and the sheep
of Shetland and Iceland had, in addition to their wool, an outer covering
of hair.

‘ ‘ How long Nature might take to change the coat of any animal it is
impossible to say, hut in the case of the Skye terrier there was at least
three centuries during which the process of adaptation to climate might
be going on. That it would require such a length of time is not likely.
The fact that the descendants of dogs brought from Skye about forty
years ago, and which have all along been carefully housed and fed, con-
tinue to exhibit the same peculiarity of coat, shows that it does not
change readily, and that the adaptation must have been completed long
before these dogs left the island, else the hereditary influences could not
be so great. Martin, Pennant, Macculloch, and others, who wrote of the
Hebrides, informs us that the houses of the inhabitants were of the
rudest description in their time, and where men are themselves badly
housed it is not likely they would pay much attention to the kennels of
their dogs. That Skyes were left a good deal to their own resources at
one period of their history some of their habits sufficiently prove.

“A gentleman who wrote about forty years ago says of them: ‘ The
terriers which I have had of this breed show some curious habits, unlike
most other dogs. I have observed that, when young, they frequently
make a kind of seat under a bush or hedge, where they will sit for hours
together, crouched like a wild animal. Unlike most other dogs, too,
they will eat (though not driven by hunger) almost anything that is given
them, such as raw eggs, the bones and meat of wild ducks or wood
pigeons and other birds, that every other kind of dog, however hungry,
rejects with disgust. In fact, in many particulars their habits resemble
those of wild animals ; they always are excellent swimmers, taking
the water quietly and fearlessly when very young.’ It is only in young
animals that the habits of remote ancestors can be seen. Training
speedily obliterates all trace of them.

“ It is seldom they quarrel amongst themselves; however, if they do
begin, they fight viciously and take every opportunity of having a new﻿The Skye Terrier.

353

settlement of their differences. Two of unequal weight sometimes fall
ont, and the weaker, instead of acknowledging defeat, requires upon
every fresh occasion to have it demonstrated that he is not the better
dog of the two. To all vermin they are determined enemies, but when
attacking the larger sorts they do so with generalship ; yet a bite from
the adversary often makes them forget their tactics, and when they do close
they can both give and take as much punishment as any dog of their
weight. They are keen hunters, have good scent, and ar.e fond of the
gun. Their speed is not great, but they stick to a scent most per-
tinaciously, and will follow a wounded animal for miles.

“ For all purposes for which the terriers are used they are of service.
As house dogs they have much to recommend them. They are watchful
to a fault; and they require less exercise to keep them in health than
almost any other terrier. When kept as house dogs merely, it is of little
consequence what weight they are ; but when required to go to ground
they must neither be big in size nor too light in weight. There has been
much difference of opinion expressed as to what should be considered the
proper weight of a Skye terrier. The olaim has frequently been made on
behalf of the Dandie that there is no terrier so game as he is. This
olaim may or may not be a just one ; but it does seem very strange, if it
is just, that the Dandie Dinmont Club should consider 201b. not too
heavy for a Dandie, and professed judges of the breed outside the club
should think an additional half stone not too heavy to exclude from the
prize list, while men who at least pretend to know about Skyes maintain
that dogs of this breed should not exceed 141b., and that preference
should be given to even lighter weights. Both breeds are used for the
same kind of work, and surely it is too much to expect a 141b. Skye to
be BucoeBsful in doing what it requires a 241b. Dandie to accomplish,
especially when the latter is the ‘ gamest of all terriers.’ Fox terriers
are not considered too large at 201b., and as a Skye has the advantage of
two or three pounds in Bhape, breeders cannot be called unreasonable if
they limit themselves to that weight. It does not follow that because a
Skye weighs 201b. he must necessarily be of large size. Bone and muscle
weigh well, and if he has plenty of these, properly put together, he will
look smaller than an ill-made dog four or five pounds lighter. This holds
true, to a certain extent, with all breeds.

“ Speed is not so much necessary with the Skye as strength The﻿354

British Dogs.

chief end of his existence is to go to ground, and power to grapple with
his subterranean foe is the first consideration. That power must, how-
ever, be in a body small enough to enable him to reach the enemy in its
stronghold ; and it follows that the particular build or shape by which
the greatest amount of strength can most easily get into a small hole is
the shape best suited for the purpose. All animals intended by Nature
to hunt their prey in holes—such as the weasel, stoat, marten, &c.—are
very long in the body and short on the leg, and it is safe to assume that
this form is the most suitable for that purpose. The Skye is the longest
and lowest of all terriers, and is, therefore, better adapted to do the
work of a terrier than any other. The proportion of length to height,
even in the longest Skye, falls far short of what it is in animals of the
weasel kind; yet objections are sometimes made to the Skye because of
the shortness of his legs. The advantage in going to ground which a
short-legged dog has over a longer-legged one must be apparent to every-
one, as the former can do his work in a natural position, while the latter
must crouch, and so lose power. Again, if there is burrowing to do, the
short-legged one has also the advantage of the other, as it is impossible
to use long legs properly in a hole. The shortest-legged of all burrowing
animals is the mole, and it is credited with being able to make a new hole
for itself in less time than any other animal can.

“ In general appearance the Skye terrier is a long, low dog, with a
large head, a very long, flat-lying, straight coat, and a sharp, intelligent
look. The head is long from the occipital bone to the eye ; it is also
broad, and has the appearance of being broader above the eyes than
between the ears. This is owing to the position of the ears, which are
set on high. The skull is flat, not domed like that of the Dandie. The
muzzle is long and broad, the jaws strong, and the teeth very large. It
is a much greater objection to the mouth of a Skye to be undershot than
overshot.

“ The perfect mouth is, of course, level, or, as many breeders prefer to
have it, with the upper teeth fitting closely over the under ones. The
eyes are dark brown or hazel in colour, of medium Bize, and are not
prominent. There should not be much falling away under the eye ; and
there is almost no hollow or stop between the forehead and the muzzle.
The ears should not be large, and if pendant, should hang straight down
and lie close to the side of the head ; if erect they should be set on high﻿The Skye Terrier.

355

and carried without any ontward inclination. The hair on the ear
should hang gracefully down and mingle with that on the cheek, which
Bhould also be plentiful. The long hair on the face and ears has been
called superfluous, but if those who think it so had ever seen one
protected in this way go to ground in a sandy bank, they would be
satisfied of its great advantage to the dog in keeping the sand out of his
eyes and ears. The neck is long, slightly crested, and very muscular.
The shoulders and forelegs feel as if they had been intended for a much
larger dog. The ohest is deep and somewhat wide, but not too much so.
The back is very long, and nearly level. Breeders have a great abhor-
rence of a roach, or, as they call it, a “ Dandie ” back. The ribs are well
sprung, the barrel round and well-ribbed home. No Skye terrier should
be flat-sided or tucked up in the flank. The loins are broad, and, like the
quarters, well clothed with muscle. The thighs are strong and well
developed, the second thighs prominent and reaching almost to the hock.
Allowance is sometimes made for the forelegs being a little bandy, but
they certainly ought to be straight. The elbows and stifles should not
incline either inwards or outwards, as the Skye should stand as fair and
square on his legs as a foxhound, and both the fore and hind feet should
always point straight in front. The tail should be carried low, with a
very slight curve. When the dog is not excited the proper position of
the tail is a little below the level of his back. The feather of it should be
long but thin. The coat, which has been already referred to, is com-
posed of two distinct qualities or kinds of hair—an under coat of short
soft woolly hair, and an outer coat, which is long and hard in texture. It
should lie close to the dog, and be free from either wave or curl. A soft-
coated dog looks larger then he really is. One of the best ways of judg-
ing a Skye is to wet him, and if he is made as he ought to be, and has a
oorreot coat upon him, he will look nearly as large when wet as when
dry, whereas if he wants Bubstanoe, or has a bunchy or soft coat, he will
not appear half the size.

“ The usual colours of Skyes are a slate blue, and all the intermediate
shades between light silver-grey and black. Fawns still crop up
occasionally, but as they are not general favourites, they are gradually
beooming soarcer. Whatever the colour of the dog, the muzzle, ears, and
tip of tail should be black, and the head and legs should always be as
dark as the body. A lightish grey, with black points, is, perhaps, the

A A 2﻿356

British Dogs.

colour most fancied by the public, but breeders prefer the darker
oolours, as there is a tendency with Skyes to throw stook lighter than
themselves.”

Weights, measurements, &c., of celebrated drop-eared Skye terriers :

Mr. James Pratt’s Piper (K.C.S.B., 4852) : Age, 6 years; weight,
161b.; height at shoulder, 9in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 30in.;
length of tail, 9in.; girth of chest, 19in. ; girth of loin, 15in. ; girth of
head, 15in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 5£in.; girth of leg lin.
below elbow, 4in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 8in. ; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in. ; colour and
markings, slatey blue.

Mr. James Pratt’s bitch Heatherlloom (K.C.S.B., 6695) : Age, 4 years ;
weight, 141b. ; height at shoulder, 8|in.; length from nose to set on of
tail, 28in.; length of tail, 7£in. ; girth of chest, 16in.; girth of loin,
12£in.; girth of head, 12in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 4in.; girth of
leg lin. below elbow, 3in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
7in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 6£in.;
colour and markings, blue.

Weights, measurements, &c., of celebrated prick-eared Skye terriers :

Mr. Duncan Cunningham’s Elcho : Age, 14 months ; weight, 171b.;
height at shoulder, 9in.; length from nose to Bet on of tail, 29in. ; length
of tail, 9in. ; girth of chest, 17in. ; girth of loin, 15£in. ; girth of head,
13£in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 6in. ; girth of leg lin. below
elbow, 5£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 7Jin. ; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7£in. ; colour and
markings, silver grey.

Mr. Duncan Cunningham’s bitch Thistle : Age, 2 years 7 months ;
weight, 151b. ; height at shoulder, 8in. ; length from nose to set on
of tail, 27in.; length of tail, 7Jin. ; girth of chest, 16in. ; girth of loin,
13in. ; girth of head, 12in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 5in ; girth
of leg lin. below elbow, 4£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
7in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 6Jin. ; colour
and markings, steel grey.

Mr. Duncan Cunningham’s Monarch : Age, 4 years 8 months ; weight,
201b ; height at shoulder, 8Jin. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 31£in. ;
length of tail, 9in.; girth of chest, 18in. ; girth of loin, 15in. ; girth of
head, 14in. girth of arm lin. above elbow, 6in. ; girth of leg lin. below﻿ddy (K.C.S.B. 3513)—Dam Mist, Sister to Dunregan (K.C.S.B.﻿﻿The Bull Terrier.

35 7

elbow, 5£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 8£in. ; girth of
muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8in.; colour and markings,
blue.

Perkie (K.P.R., 282) : Age, 2 years and 7 months ; weight, 161b.;
height at Bhoulder, 8fin. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 30in.;
length of tail, 8in.; girth of chest, 17in. j girth of loin, 14in.; girth of
head, 12£in; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 52in. ; girth of forearm lin.
below elbow, 5£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 7fin.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 6fin. ; colour and
markings, steel grey or blue.


Chapter XXIII.—THE BULL TERRIER.

By W. J. Tbedinnick.

The bull terrier is understood to be the produce of a cross between the
bulldog and the terrier, but it is generally admitted that there are other
elements in the bull terrier of the present day. What the source of
those elements may be, whether the greyhound, pointer, or foxhound,
we can only suspect in the absence of direct proof. The bull terrier
is noted for its beautiful form with great substance and its innate attach-
ment to everything domestic, which, with its indisputable pluck, makes
him a most excellent companion. Although the fashion of testing his
courage by pitting one against another has ceased to exist, we still
expect to find in him all the essential attributes of the “ fighting dog,”
as the breed is judged by that standard. “ Stonehenge” commends the
bull terrier as a vermin dog, and I agree so far as work above ground,
but for going to earth, my experience has told me he is scarcely suitable,
for if the game be “fox” he will invariably prove “too hard” for
Reynard, and, on the other hand, if it be “ badger ” or “ otter,” he will
stiok so close to his work that he will be placed hors de combat for
many a day, even if nothing worse happens to him.

The bull terrier, like all other breeds of dogs, has been greatly improved
in general appearance Bince dog shows have become so general, for now,﻿35§

British Dogs.

instead of haying a variety of types, colours, and sizes, some of which
were far from prepossessing in appearance, we have one recognised
type and colour, which has found favour with many gentlemen who
would never think of possessing a specimen of the smut, brindle, or
patched varieties. The late Mr. James Hints, Birmingham, will long
be remembered as one who did more than any other individual to
improve the bull terrier, and many of our best specimens bear testimony
to that fact, as they date from his strain. There are two strains that
breeders go back to for pedigree, one known as that of a celebrity called
Madman, and the other Old Victor, both of which passed through the
hands of the late Mr. Hinks, but the latter is the fashionable blood of
the day.

The best of the celebrated Old Victor’s descendants now living is the
stud dog known by that name, to be found among the team left by the
late Mr. Hinks, and the champion bull terrier Tarquin (late the property
of Mr. Vero Shaw, and now owned by Sir Wm. H. Verner, Bart.), a
grandson of Old Victor.

Breeders should not go too much for great weight in the large-sized
specimen. I consider 451b. quite large enough for any specimen,
especially for exhibition purposes, as when we get above that weight we
lose more important detail, such as formation of skull, tightness of lip,
straight legs, and symmetry, points which should not be sacrificed to get
weight. The best sizes for exhibition purposes are 161b., 201b., 251b.,
and as near to 451b. as can be. I do not mean to say that a pound or two
either way in the large-sized specimens would be objectionable, but the
nearer they can be bred to the weights named the better chance of their
success upon the show bench. I adopt the points as given by “Stone-
henge,” which are worthy the attention of all interested in the breed.
The points are as follow :

The skull should be long and flat, wedge shaped, i.e., wide behind,
with the smaller end at the place of the brow, which should not be at
all prominent. The line from the occiput to the end of nose should
be as straight as possible, without either brow or hollow in front of the
eyes. This line is never absolutely straight, but the nearer it approaches
to a straight line the better. The skull should, however, be “ broken
up,” but not to anything like the same extent as in the bulldog.

Face, eyes, lips, and teeth. The jaws must be long and powerful,﻿The Bull Terrier.

359

nose large and black. Eyes small and black, with black edged eyelids
for choice. The npper lip should be as tight over the jaw as possible,
any superfluous skin or approach to chop being undesirable. The
under lip should also be small. The teeth should be regular in shape,
meeting exactly without any deviation from the straight line. A pig
jaw is as great a fault as being under hung.

The ears are always cropped for show purposes, and the degree of
perfection with which this has been accomplished is generally considered.
They should be brought to a fine point and exactly match. In their
uncropped state they vary a good deal in shape, and seldom reach their
full proportion till after teething.

The neck Bhould be rather long and gracefully set into the shoulders,
from which it should taper to the head, without any throatiness or
approach to dewlap, as in the bulldog.

Shoulders and chest. The shoulders should be strong and slanting,
with a wide and deep chest, but the last ribs are not very deep, though
brought well back towads the hips.

The back should be short, and well furnished with muscle, running
forward between the shoulder blades in a firm bundle on each side.

The legs. The fore legs should be long and perfectly straight, the
elbows lying in the same plane as the shoulder points, and not outside
them, as in the bulldog. The hind legs should also be long and
muscular, with straight hocks well let down, i.e., near the ground.

The feet are rather long than catlike ; but they should be well
arched and close together.

The coat must be short and close, but hard rather than Bilky, though
when in show condition it should shine from constant friction.

The colour for show purposes, must be pure white, though there are
many well-shaped dogs of other oolours. This is, however, purely a
fanoy breed, and as such there is not the slightest reason why an
arbitrary rule should not be made, as it was without doubt in this case,
and it is useless to show a dog of any other colour.

The tail or stern, should be set on low, fine in bone, and carried
straight out, without any curl over the back.

Of symmetry this dog Bhows a considerable amount, all his points
being agreeable to the eye of the artist. Any deviation from a due
proportion should therefore be punished accordingly.﻿360

British Dogs.

Among the principal exhibitors of this breed are: Sir Wm. Hercules
Vemer, Bart.; Messrs. R. J. Hartley, Altrincham; J. S. Day, Oldham ;
W. J. Tredinnick, St. Austell; C. E. Firmstone, Stourbridge; C. L.
Boyce, Birmingham; J. It. Pratt, Stoke-on-Trent; W. Adams, Ipswioh ;
Mrs. James Hinks, Birmingham; and Mr. Alfred George, Kensal Town.

The subject we have selected for illustration is Mr. W. J. Tredinnick’s
champion Young Puss, a well-known prize winner, and a specimen
possessing the important points in great force.

Weights and measurements of a few celebrated bull terriers :

Mr. Robt. D. Graham’s Tarqv/m II. : Age, 3 years ; weight, 501b. ;
height at shoulder, 21in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 36£in.;
length of tail, 12£in.; girth of chest, 25£in.; girth of loin, 19in.; girth
of head, 18in. ; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 9£in.; girth of leg lin.
below elbow, 6£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9in.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 8£in.; colour and
markings, white.

Messrs. R. B. and T. S. Carey’s champion Scarlet (K.C.S.B., 7635) :
Weight, 241b. ; height at shoulder, 15in.; length from nose to set on of
tail, 30in. ; length of tail, 8in.; girth of chest, 21in.; girth of loin, 17in. ;
girth of head, 13in. ; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 5 Jin.; girth of leg
lin. below elbow, 4£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 8iin.;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in.; colour, white.

Mr. P. L. King’s Sankey: Age, 4£ years; weight, 231b.; height at
shoulder, 14in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 26in. ; length of
tail, 9in. ; shoulder to shoulder, 7in., and right round, 17in.; girth of
loin, 18in. ; girth of head, 13£in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 6|in.;
girth of leg lin. below elbow, 4£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip
of nose, 3in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
7£in.; colour and markings, white with black nose.

Mr. James Chatwin’s Thyra: Age, 1 year 11 months; weight, 151b. ;
height at shoulder, 13£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 24£in.;
length of tail, 7|in.; girth of chest, 19in.; girth of loin, 14£in.; girth
of head, 12in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 6£in.; girth of leg lin.
below elbow, 4$in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 7in. ;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 6£in. ; colour and
markings, white.

Mr. W. J. Tredinnick’s champion Young Puss: Age, uncertain; weight,﻿. J. TREDINNICK’S BULL TERRIER “PUSS” (K.C.S.B.
Sire Mr. May hew's Victor—Dam Mr. Steel’s Puss.﻿﻿The Bull Terrier.

361

381b.; height at shoulder, 18in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 31in.;
length of tail, 8£in.; girth of chest, 26£in.; girth of loin, 21in.; girth
of head, 16in.; girth of forearm, 5fin.; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, 8fin.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
8in. This is the bitch represented in our engraving.

Mr. W. J. Tredinnick’s Little Princess (late Daisy) : Age, about 4
years 6 months ; weight under 161b.; height at shoulder, 14in.; length
from nose to set on of tail 17in; length of tail, 9in.; girth of chest,
18iin.; girth of loin, 15£m.; girth of head, 12£in. ; girth of forearm,
4£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 6fin.; girth of muzzle
midway between eyes and tip of nose, 6£in. Little Princess is winner of
ten first and three second prizes, including second Birmingham, second
Bristol (twice).

Mr. J. M. Marshall's Noble (K.C.S.B., 6593) : Weight, 411b. ; girth of
neok, 16in.; girth of shoulders, 28in.; height at shoulder, 19in.; length
from nose to set on of tail, 30£in. ; length of tail, L2£in. ; girth of ohest,
24in.; girth of loin, 19in.; girth of head, 18in.; girth of arm lin. above
elbow, 8in. ; girth of leg lin. below elbow, 6£in.; length of head from
occiput to tip of nose, 7fin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 9£in. ; oolour and markings, white.

Mr. R. J. Hartley’s Magnet: Age, 4£ years ; weight, 421b. ; height at
shoulder, 18£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 30£in.; length of
tail, 10£in. ; girth of chest, 25in.; girth of loin, 19in.; girth of head,
15iin.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 9|in.; girth of leg lin. below
elbow, 6iin ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9in. ; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 9£in. ; girth of pastern,
4in. ; hock to ground, 5in. ; between ears, 4in. ; colour, white.

Mr. R. J. Hartley’s Violet: Age, 3£ years ; weight, 451b. ; height at
shoulder, 18£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 31 lin.; length of
tail, 9£in. ; girth of chest, 26iin. ; girth of loin, 22in.; girth of head,
16|in. ; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 10|in. ; girth of leg lin. below
elbow, 6£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 9£in. ; girth of
muzzle, lOin.; girth of pastern, 4£in. ; hock to ground, 5&in.; between
ears, 4£in. ; colour, white.﻿362

British Dogs.

Chapter XXIV.—THE SCOTCH TERRIER.

By Corsincon.

Scotland is prolific in terriers, and for tlie most part these are long-
backed and short-legged dogs. Snch is the Dandie Dinmont, the Skye,
and the Aberdeen terrier ; but the old hard and shorthaired “ terry” of
the West of Scotland, as I recollect him when a boy, was much nearer in
shape to a modern fox terrier, but with a shorter and rounder head, the
colour of their hard wiry coat mostly sandy, the face free from long hair,
although some showing a beard, and the small ears carried in most
instances semi-erect, in some pricked.

The Kennel Club has on several occasions instituted classes for the
old Scotch terrier at their Bhows, but these have never obtained sufficient
entries to encourage the club to keep the class open, until at their sum-
mer show, 1879, when they received the support and co-operation of the
recently formed Scotch terrier club, or of those who had discussed the
propriety of forming such a club, and who, I believe, subscribed the
prize money, found or suggested the judge, and made most of the entries,
which latter amounted to fifteen.

Unfortunately, those selected for prizes, although undoubtedly hard-
haired Scotch terriers, as the schedule described them, were not the old
hard-haired Scotch terrier, but a well-known distinct variety yclept the
Aberdeen terrier, several of the winners being in fact imports from the
granite city or the district. The best in the class, judged as an old Scotch
terrier, was Mr. J. C. Carrick’s Pig, and as the judge, Mr. J. B. Morrison,
was brought specially from the West of Scotland to judge this class,
his going for the short-legged Aberdonians was the more astonishing.
It may, however, be accounted for, if we recollect that Mr. Morrison is a
Skye terrier fancier, and suppose that breed, in common parlance, to have
“ filled his eye.”

The true old Scotch terrier should be a stoutly built dog, leggy in
comparison with the Skye, Dandie, or Aberdeen, varying in size, as all
breeds little cared for do, but easily to be kept near to a standard of
151b. to 181b., which I hold to be the most useful for a working ‘‘var-
mint ’ ’ dog, even if he is not wanted to go to ground.﻿The Scotch Terrier.

363

The head rather short and the skull somewhat round, the jaws being
strong and also short—more or less bearded; a long lean punishing jaw,
as the phrase goes, is a modem feature in terriers of any variety, and the
idea is often carried to great excess.

The eyes bright and keen, peering through short shaggy hair.

The ears small, covered with soft short hair, semi-erect, falling over
at the tip.

The neck short and strong.

The chest moderately deep, ribs strong, the back ones fairly developed,
the back short as a fox terrier’s, with strong loins and good muscular
square buttocks.

The legs stout, well covered with hard hair, stifles only moderately
bent, front legs straight, all covered with hard short hair; the feet
compact, and hard in the sole, and the claws strong.

The tail, if undocked, 8in. to lOin. long, brash-like, not fringed, the
covering being hard hair.

The prevailing colour sandy, sometimes a dark grizzle, and I have
occasionally seen them brindled.

The coat hard and very dense, from lin. or rather less to 2in. in length
at the greatest.

I give the above, written from memory, as a rough description of the
Scotch terrier, as kept by my father, and such as were commonly met with
in the West of Scotland some forty years ago.

The above admittedly rough description first appeared in The Bazaar
newspaper, and drew forth rather strong letters expressing views
antagonistic to those of mine.

Mr. J. B. Morrison, the judge referred to, naturally adheres to the
type he selected as best illustrating the breed of the old Scotch terrier at
the Alexandra Palace Show, and “The Badger,’’who owned the prize
winners, as naturally followed suit.

I respect both these gentlemen and their opinions, and wishing that
both views might find expression in “ British Dogs,” I offered, at “ The
Badger’s” request, to give publicity to his remarks on the breed; but
after waiting some time, to the inconvenience of the publishers, without
receiving anything on the subjeot from “The Badger,” I can only say that
I believe his views and description of an old hard-haired Scotch terrier will
be found given, as well as I waB able, under the heading Aberdeen Terrier.﻿364

British Dogs.

I have, however, had the pleasure of receiving a letter from Mr. S. D.
Hine, a gentleman who has for many years bred Scotch terriers, and
whose description differs both from the gentlemen above referred to, and
from mine on some points, whilst on others we are all agreed. Mr. Hine
says : “ He is a square-built dog, about lOin. high, not over 141b. in
weight, and with a hard straight coat, no tendency to curl, and in
texture more allied to badger bristles, with a total absence of any
approach to silkiness. His coat is abundant and rough, but more thick
than long in the hair ; colour any shade of brown, tan, yellow or grey,
seldom black, never white in the pure breed, and blue invariably
indicates a cross with the Italian greyhound. In body he is rather long
and low, not weasel-shaped like a Skye, still less leggy, like a Bedlington
terrier, thicker in bone in the limbs than a Fox terrier, with very muscu-
lar thighs. In conformation of head he is inclined to squareness, with
rather full frontal development, the jaws closing level with each other,
not snipey or pointed. The eye is rather full, and the irides brown, the
darker the better; ears short and drop, never pricked. The neck is
thickish and rather shorter than any other breed of terrier. In tempera-
ment the Scotch terrier is rather grave than gay, always looks full of
business, but is seldom savage. I have bred a great many, but never
knew one turn out morose or sulky in disposition. Very attached and
affectionate to his master ; very plucky, but not quarrelsome. They are
hardy and robust in constitution, and mostly good water dogs. I think
it is a breed of dog not so well known as it Bhould be, and only wanting
to be known to be very highly valued.”

I have pleasure in giving Mr. Hine’s description, although it does not
alter my opinion that a more leggy dog than one lOin. high was, and is,
in many parts of Scotland recognised as the right stamp. It appears to
me that in this, as in all breeds when not specially bred to a standard,
considerable difference is sure to arise, and one style of dog will be
found peculiar to one district, another to another, all having sprung
from one parent stock.

Whilst, therefore, I look upon the Aberdeen terrier as a Scotch
terrier,—as I have endeavoured to describe him he differs considerably
from what in youth I knew as the Scotch terrier, and as these terriers
exist in such numbers, I think in this age of sub-division of varieties
and minute description, he deserved to be separately treated.﻿The Scotch Terrier.

365

I will now give quotations from two justly eminent writers on dogs, and
it would be easy to quote many others who have written similarly on the
subject. Youatt says: “ There are three varieties, first the common
Scotch terrier, 12 or 13in. high; his body muscular and compact,
considerable breadth across the loins, the legs shorter and stouter than
those of the English terrier, the head large in proportion to size of body,
the muzzle small and pointed .	.	. the hair long and rough, colour

black or fawn .	.	. Another species has nearly the same conforma-
tion .	.	. legs apparently, but not actually, shorter; body covered

with longer, more curly, and stouter hair. ... A third species, of con-
siderably larger bulk, and 3in. or 4in. taller than either of the others ;
its hair is shorter than that of the others, and is hard and wiry.”

“Stonehenge” says : “The Scotch terrier closely resembles the English
terrier in all but his coat, which is wiry and rough, and hence he is some-
times called the wire-haired terrier ; a name, perhaps, better suited to
a dog which has long been naturalised in England, and whose origin is
obscure enough. Beyond this difference in externals there is little to
be said distinctive of the one from the other, the colours being the same,
but white being more highly prized in the southern variety, and the black
and tan when more or less mixed with grey, so as to give the dog a pepper
and salt appearance, being characteristic of the true Scotch terrier; but
there are numberless varieties in size, and also in shape and colour.”

I hold that such writers as I have quoted, and others who have
similarly written, should not be ignored by “ fanciers,” who are too apt
to possess themselves of the dog first, and from him frame their standard
by which to jndge, regardless of the views and opinions of others.

As already said, I see no reason to alter my rough description. I look
upon it as an attempt only to draw a more marked line between varieties
which differ considerably in character, far more in fact than drop-eared
and prick-eared Skye terriers, which are now bred distinct, and are given
separate classes at shows.

I repeat, without the slightest disrespect to Mr. Morrison, that the
dogs awarded prizes by him as Scotch terriers are nearer in type to Skye
terriers than the one I oonsider the lowland Scotch terrier, and-are what
I have attempted to describe as Aberdeen terriers.﻿366

British Dogs.

Chapter XXV.—THE IRISH TERRIER.

By Cobsincon.

The enthusiasm characteristic of Irishmen has, within the last few years,
brought this terrier to the front with a dash.

Lovers of the breed, those who best knew its inherent good and useful
qualities, worked hard, and patiently to gain for it public recognition
as a distinct variety, and laboured long before success crowned their
efforts.

Many influences hindered the advance of the Irish terrier in public
esteem, and not least among these may be reckoned the internecine war
carried on in the public prints by the fanciers of the breed, with all the
gusto with which Irishmen are supposed to fight.

The law of compromise in debateable points was at first ignored, and,
it is to be feared, is still but partially recognised and acted upon among
them, although the formation of the Irish Terrier Club has done wonders
in welding into unanimity opinions and prejudices which it appeared
impossible to harmonise.

If the leaders themselves were for long irreconcilable in their opinions
as to what an Irish terrier was, or should be, it is not to be wondered at
if this added to the confusion in the public mind. Classes for the breed
were instituted at the principal Irish and some of the Scotch dog shows,
and as every Irishman who owned a terrier thought—and small blame
to him—that he possessed the genuine article, the benches were filled
with animals of the most astonishing diversity of character ; and the
critics and the public, who looked at them as the supposed representa-
tives of a distinct breed, were principally struck with the intense
mongrelism exhibited by them as a whole.

The impression thus produced was greatly strengthened by the con-
tradictory decisions of judges; and I confess that, between the war of
words raging between breeders and the eccentric awards alluded to, it
was some considerable time before I could get fixed in my mind the
ideal of an Irish terrier as now accepted by all the best breeders and
exhibitors.

Of those who have done so much to popularise this useful hardy terrier,﻿The Irish Terrier.

367

I may mention as among the pioneers Messrs. Morton, Erwin, Ridgway,
Montgomery, Jamison, Crosbie Smith, and Dr. Marks, some of whom
are still prominent in the fancy with their able coadjutors in forwarding
Irish terrier interests—Messrs. A. Krehl, G. R. Krehl, Despard, Dr.
Carey, and others.

The first practical step that produced marked results in consolidating
the conflicting interests and influences that had previously hindered the
true progress of the breed, was the drawing tip of a standard, agreed to
and signed by twenty-five breeders and exhibitors, for publication in
“ Dogs of the British Islands.”

“ Stonehenge ” had refused to recognise in his book a dog about whioh
no two seemed to agree, and which he believed in no way differed from
the old Scotch terrier commonly met with in England in the early part
of the present century.

At the request of some friends—Irish terrier fanciers—I endeavoured
to mediate in favour of a recognition of the breed in so important a work,
and found that the author had taken the wise resolve to publish, on con-
dition of a standard being drawn up and agreed to by a sufficient number of
breeders, so as to ensure unanimity. The next important step was getting
separate classes instituted for them at Kennel Club shows, and in the
attainment of this end I also had the pleasure of acting as an advocate.
These classes filled well, and with a higher bred and more level lot than
I had ever previously seen shown, and led, I think, to that most im-
portant step, the formation of the Irish Terrier Club, which has done
so much to improve and popularise the breed. To Mr. G. R. Krehl, I
believe, belongs the chief honour of founding the Club, and certainly to
his untiring energy much of its success is due.

In general appearance the Irish terrier is not taking, except to the eye
of those who can detect merit under an unpolished exterior; but as so
many warm and generous hearts beat under “ cloth of frieze,” so under
the rough unkempt coat of the Irish terrier there is a spirit of *' derring-
do,” a strength of affection for his master equal to his pluck, and a
stamina that carries a little racing-like wiry frame through the hardest
of days.

As a terrier he is bred too large for going to earth after the smaller
vermin, but for all above ground work he is unexcelled, although not as
injudicious admirers will have it, unequalled; added to hiB undeniable﻿368

British Dogs.

“varmint” look, his racing build shows speed and nimbleness, most
useful qualities in rabbitting, ratting, and kindred sports. They are
excellent, too, as water dogs, and the coat short and hard, with a close
soft inner jacket, is a first rate wet resister.

Irish terrier fanciers have not been free from the weakness of claiming
for the breed a long and pure descent.

Mr. Ridgway says : “ It is a pure breed indigenous to Ireland,” that
it “ has been known in Ireland as long as that country has been an island,
and I ground my faith on their age and purity on the fact that there exists
old ma/nuscrijots in Irish mentioning the existence of the breed at a very
remote period.”

Surely man never yet “ grounded his faith” on a more slender basis.
The patriarch Job, in an old manuscript written in a language older than
Irish, refers to the “ dogs of his flock,” so when his descendants take to
sheepdog showing they may “ ground their faith ’ ’ in the antiquity and
purity of their colleys by Mr. Ridgway’s example, and with as much
logical and historical support. In English manuscripts of the 13th
century, the existence of terriers in this island is referred to, but which, if
any, of the numerous varieties we now have, approach in form the dog
of that time it would be difficult to say.

No matter whether the terrier under consideration was “indigenous”
to Ireland, or whether he is of still more ancient blood, a true Milesian
engaged in worrying Grecian rats before Ireland was the island of the
Irish, Mr. Ridgway did a vast deal better service to the breed by
drawing up a standard of excellence and code of points descriptive of
the dog than by vain attempts to prove his long and pure descent.

It has been felt that the descriptive points, originally drawn up by Mr.
Ridgway, and agreed to by twenty-four others, is scarcely elaborated
enough for the increasing difficulties that arise in distinguishing between
merit when the competition is close, and I therefore have pleasure
in submitting remarks on the breed, and a more minute description of
points drawn up by Mr. G. Jamison.

Theselplace following those of Mr.Ridgwayas given in “ Stonehenge’s”
work, and as I think there is a tendency to swerve from the original
lines, which is very different from a necessary elaboration of points, I
offer comments, explanatory of my own views, leaving readers interested
in the breed to form their own conclusions.﻿The Irish Terrier.

369

As I understand the club are about to frame a standard and code of
points, and that those of Mr. Jamison’s may form the basis of discussion,
I venture to point out what appears to me a danger of altering the
character of the dog as at present recognised, and sure (if I may use an
Irishism) that would be a sad thing to befall a dog so ancient and pure
that he has been referred to in old manuscripts in Irish.

Mr. G. Jamison writes :

“ The Irish terrier, as his name denotes, is the representative of the
Emerald Isle, and specially suitable for his native damp country, being
able to stand much more wet, cold, and fatigue than most other terriers ;
the coat is so hard and flat on the body that wet cannot penetrate, and,
not being too long, does not hinder them in cover work. This breed is
more used as vermin destroyers than for any other purpose, which
principally accounts for breeding for size being neglected; however,
within the last four or five years the breed has been much closer looked
after, and at the present time there are a number of these dogs that in
point of show qualities approach as near perfection as most breeds.
There are a certain number of enthusiasts who have been writing this
breed up in fancier papers as the only genuine working terrier ; this, of
course, is nonsense; at the same time it is a recognised fact that
from their peculiar hardy and active habits they at least are deserving
of a front rank among working terriers. In the beginning of the year
1879 the Irish Terrier Club was inaugurated for the protection and
breeding of pure specimens ; the club has been the means of the breed
being brought more prominently before the public.

“ Head. Skull must be fiat and moderately narrow between ears,
getting narrower towards the eye, without much stop ; the jaw must
be strong and muscular, not too full in the cheek and of a fair
punishing length, but not so fine as a black and tan or white English
terrier ; there should be a little falling away or chiselling out below the
eye, bo as not to give a greyhound appearance ; teeth should be strong and
level; nose must be black ; eyes generally of a dark hazel colour, small,
and full of life and fire; ears, when uncut, small and V shaped, of
moderate thickness, set well up on the head, and dropping forward closely
to the cheek; the ear must be free of fringe and the hair thereon shorter
and generally darker in colour than the body ; as long as the present
demand for terrier character is prevalent we are afraid the adversaries to

B B﻿370

British Dogs.

cropping will have a poor chance in the show ring, for undoubtedly
cropping gives character and smartness of appearance.

“ Neck. Should be of a fair length and gradually widening towards
the shoulders, well carried, and free of throatiness.

“ Shoulders and chest. Shoulders must be fine, long, and sloping well
into the back, the chest deep and muscular but not broad.

‘ ‘ Back and loin. The back should be strong and straight, with no
appearance of slackness behind the shoulders ; the loin broad and
powerful and slightly arched ; ribs well sprung and well ribbed back.

“The hind quarters. Well under the dog, should be strong and
muscular, the thighs powerful, hocks near the ground, stifles not much
bent.

‘ ‘ Stern. Generally cut, should be free of fringe or feather, set on
pretty high, carried gaily, but not over the back or curled.

“ Feet and legs. Feet should be strong and round and moderately
small, toes arched, and neither turned out nor in; black toe-nails
are preferable, but of little value over light ones. A much greater
objection is white toes ; once white toes are thoroughly got rid of, there
will be very few light coloured toenails; legs moderately long, with
plenty of bone and muscle, must be straight viewed from all directions,
the elbows working freely just clear of the side ; pasterns short and
straight, hardly noticeable; both fore and hind legs should be moved
straight forward when travelling, the stifles not turned outwards, the legs
free of feather and covered, like the head, with as hard texture of coat
as body, but not so long.

“ Coat. Hard and wiry, free of softness or silkiness, not too long,
perfectly straight and flat, no shagginess, and free of waviness, lock, or
curl; the hair on head and legs is shorter than on body, but must be
bard and wiry.

“Colour. Must be ‘whole coloured,’ the most preferable being
bright red, next yellow, grey, or wheaten ; white very objectionable on
either chest or feet, in fact much white is a disqualifying point.

“ Size and symmetry. Weight, in show condition, from 161b. to
241b., but in a short time we hope to see the largest reduced to under
221b., which is a nice, stylish, and useful size ; the dog must present a gay,
lively, and active appearance, lots of substance, at same time free of
clumsiness, as speed and endurance as well as power are very essential.﻿The Irish Terrier.

371

“Disqualifying points : Nose white, cherry, or spotted to any con-
siderable extent; month much undershot or cankered; colour brindle or
much white ; coat ourly or soft.”

First as to ears. Mr. Jamison implies that cropping gives a “ terrier
character ” to a dog ; this seems to need no contradiction, as the opinion
is no more than one hastily made. Have the Skye, Bedlington, Dandie
Dinmont, and Fox terriers no “terrier character P” and yet their ears
are not cropped.

The only character cropping gives is that of mongrelism, and associa-
tion with the lowest in taste and most uneducated of the fancy; good
reasons can be shown for “ rounding,” although they may not be uncon-
trovertible, but who ever heard a reason satisfactory to a sane and humane
mind in favour of cropping ? That in dealing with their dogs, gentlemen
of education and refined taste in most matters should permit themselves
to be ruled by the practices of the ignorant and vulgar, is to me a mystery.
It is to be expected that the ignorant and thoughtless should be unaware
or overlook in indulging a caprice, or what they wrongly call taste, that
they are exposing to constant danger of inflammation, canker, and other
evils, one of the most delicate organisms ; but the higher class of fanciers
have no excuse for the evil they do in following a fashion which destroys
nature’s necessary provision against danger and accident to a sensitive
organ. I hope the Irish Terrier Club will put their veto on the abomin-
able practice.

The other point I wish to comment on is the ribs. Mr. Jamison says :
“ ribs well sprung and well ribbed back.”

It has always been held that this terrier should possess speed, that he
should be of “a racing build.” Spuds waB admitted to be the correct
type to breed to by those who signed Mr. Eidgway’s code, and she is not
only a fast bitch but looks it, and is certainly not “ well ribbed back,”
if by that is meant that the baok ribs are well let down, which is what I
understand by the expression.

To be well ribbed back is to give strength at the sacrifice of speed, to
create not a fast but a cobby dog. The Dandie Dinmont and the pug
should be well ribbed back, but they are not built for speed, and any dog
to be fast must be more or less up in the flank after the manner of a
greyhound, not with deep back ribs like a mastiff.

The front ribs should be rather deep than round and well sprung,

B B 2﻿372

British Dogs.

implies roundness and that carries with it a wide chest. That formation
makes a dog slow, and if we have the deep cheBt with the round ribs, we
have this intensified. In my opinion the ribs should come well out from
their insertion, and show a very slight curve in their descent, the dog
appearing by comparison with a Dandie Dinmont to be flat sided,
whereas well sprung ribs would give a barrel shape, and this is in-
consistent with other points; the head, for instance, which in this
breed is long, and all fast dogs are long in the head and deep but
not wide in the chest and more or less cut up in the flank, and the
latter point is inconsistent with deep back ribs.

The subject of our illustration is Spuds, a celebrated bitch that has
won many prizes and served as a model for breeders, although now
equalled, if not outstripped, by younger ones.

The descriptive points, drawn up by Mr. R. G. Ridgway and endorsed
by signatures of twenty-four other breeders, are as follow :

Head. Long and rather narrow across skull; flat, and perfectly free
from stop or wrinkle.

Muzzle. Long and rather pointed, bnt strong in make, with good
black nose, and free from loose flesh and chop.

Teeth. Perfectly level, and evenly set in good strong jaws.

Ears. When uncut, small and filbert shaped, and lying close to head,
colour of which is sometimes darker than rest of body, hair on ears short
and free from fringe.

Neck. Tolerably long and well arched.

Legs. Moderately long, well set ;from shoulders, with plenty of bone
and muscle, must be perfectly straight, and covered, like the ears and
head, with a similar texture of coat as the body, but not quite so long.

Eyes. Small, keen, and hazel colour.

Feet. Strong, tolerably round, with toes well split up ; most pure
specimens have black toe nails.

Chest. Muscular, and rather deep, but should not be either full or
wide.

Body. Moderately long, with ribs well Bprung; loin and back should
show great strength, and all well knit together.

Coat. Must be hard, rough, and wiry, in decided contradistinction
to softness, shaggyness, silkyness, and all parts perfectly free from rock
or curl. Hair on head and legs not quite so long as rest of body.﻿MR. J. J. PIM’S IRISH TERRIER “SPUDS” (K.C.S.B.﻿﻿The Irish Terrier.

373

Colour most desired is red, and the brighter the colour the better,
next in order, wheaten or yellow, and grey, but brindle is to be objected
to, thereby showing intermixture of the bull breed.

Tail. If uncut, carried gaily without a ring, and showing absence of
feather and bushiness.

Weight of good working Irish terrier varies from 171b. to 251b.; in
olden times I understand that they ran up to 301b. and 351b., but it is
better to fix the standard weight as mentioned, viz., 171b. to 251b.

Measurements, &c., of celebrated Irish terriers :

Mr. J. J. Pirn’s champion Spuds: Age, 2i years; weight, 271b.;
height at shoulder, 17in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 31fin.;
tail cut; girth of cheBt, 22in. ; girth of loin, 18in.; girth of head,
13£in.; girth of leg lin. below elbow, 5in.; length of head from occiput
to tip of nose, 9in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 8£in. ; girth of neck, 12in. ; colour and markings, red.

Mr. G. R. Krehl’s bitch Blarney : Weight, 141b. ; height at shoulder,
12$in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 25£in. ; tail docked; girth
of chest, 19in.; girth of loin, 15in.; girth of head, 12in. ■ girth of arm,
5£in.; girth of forearm, 4£in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of
nose, 6£in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 6£in.;
cropped.

Mr. R. B. Carey’s bitch Colleen Dhas: Weight, 211b.; height at
shoulder, 15in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 27£in. ; length of
tail, 4£in.; girth of chest, 18£in. ; girth of loin, 15in.; girth of head,
12in.; girth of arm, 6in.; girth of forearm, 4£in. ; length of head from
ocoiput to tip of nose, 7£in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 6£in.; cropped.

Mr. E. F. Despard’s Jaque: Age, 1 year 4 months; weight, 16£lb. ;
height at shoulder, 13iin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 23in.;
length of tail, 4in.; girth of chest, 18£in.; girth of loin, 15in. ; girth
of head, llin.; girth of arm, 5£in.; girth of forearm, 42in. ; length of
head from occiput to tip of nose, 6iin.; girth of muzzle midway between
eyes and tip of nose, 6in.; oolour, bright red, not a white hair ; toenails,
black.

Mr. E. F. Despard’s Kitty : Age, 1 year 4 months; weight, 231b. ;
height at shoulder, 15in.; length from nose to Bet on of tail, 29in. ;
length of tail, 3£in. ; girth of chest, 21£in. ; girth of loin, 17iin. ; girth﻿374

British Dogs.

of head, 12£in.; girth of arm, 7£in.; girth of forearm, 5in. ; length
of head from occiput to tip of nose, 7£in. ; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 6£in.; colour, red, not a white hair ; toe-
nails, black.

Mr. E. B. Carey’s dog NabockUsh: Weight, 201b.; height at shoulder,
14|in. ; length from nose to	set on	of tail, 27£in.	;	length of tail,

3&in. ; girth of chest, 19in.;	girth	of loin, 15in.;	girth of head,

12£in.; girth of arm, 6fin.; girth of	forearm, 4£in.;	length of head

from occiput to tip of of nose,	7£in.;	girth of muzzle	midway between

eyes and tip of nose, 6£in.; cropped.

Messrs. E. B. and T. S. Carey’s dog Shamrock (late Gaelic) : Age, 2$
years ; weight, 231b. ; height at shoulder, 16in.; length from nose to
set on of tail, 26in.; length of tail, 6in., docked; girth of chest, 22in. ;
girth of loin, 19£in. ; girth of head, 13in. ; girth of arm, 5fin. ; girth of
forearm, 5fin.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 8£in.; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7£in.; colour and
markings, red, black nails ; ears cropped.

Mr. G-. Krehl’s Sporter : Weight, 221b.; height at shoulder, 16in. ;
length from nose to set on tail, 28in ; tail docked; girth of chest, 22in.
girth of loin, 152in. ; girth of head, 13in. ; girth of arm, 7£in.; girth of
forearm, 5iin.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 7in.; girth
of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in.; not cropped ; all
black toenails.

Mr. A. F. W. Krehl’s Paddy II. : Age, 2 years 3 months ; weight,
251b.; height at shoulder, 15£in.; length from nose to set on of tail,
28£in. ; tail docked; girth of chest, 24in.; girth of loin, 17in.; girth of
head, 14in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 7£in.; girth of leg lin. below
elbow, 52in. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 7fin. ; girth of
muzzle, 7£in.; colour and markings all bright red ; ears cropped.

﻿The White English Terrier.

375

Chapter XXVI.—THE WHITE ENGLISH
TERRIER.

By Corsincon.

The white English terrier, like many other breeds, has undergone consi-
derable modification since public dog shows came into being. How
the modem dog of that name was manufactured I do not pretend
to say with certainty. Mr. James Roocroft, Mr. Peter Swindells, and
a few other Lancashire fanciers could throw light on the subject, but I
shall not be very far out if I say a small dash of a light coloured and
rather weedy fox terrier, a strong dash of bull terrier, and a double dash
of whippet are about the proportions, and the correct ingredients used.

The dog Bhown in the early days of exhibitions was a comparatively
thick-headed and a heavier made dog than those of to-day. The
Lancashire breeders appear to have taken the black and tan terrier as
their model, and moulded the white terrier to his form, and it was a good
line to take, and the idea has been worked out with considerable success,
although in many specimens we are still unpleasantly reminded of the
Italian greyhound in the wheel back and hooped tail that take off from
their terrier character.

Among the old show celebrities, Mr. Walker’s (of Bolton) Old Tim
stood high, winning at all the principal shows, and sired some good ones,
some of his own name, whilst a host of others were called after him—
for, in nomenclature, dog fanciers are as imitative as parrots. Gem, by
Old Tim, out of Swindell’s Empress, was another great success in the
ring, and his son Joe, out of Pink, was like his sire and dam, a great
prize winner—indeed, when the three last named were in one kennel and
at their best, they were invincible. Since they went off from their best
form, Roocroft’s, now Mr. Alfred Benjamin’s Sylph and her son Silvio
by Joe have held supreme Bway, and Mr. Mather’s Vril and his Snow
have also at recent shows taken premier honours. These may all be
said to be of the same blood, being more or less related, and dose in-
breeding will still be of advantage in fixing the type that it has been the
desire to establish.﻿376

British Dogs.

Of course in doing this a selection of the fittest must be made, for it
is one of the facts connected therewith which should never be lost sight
of in breeding, that there is a strong tendency in nature to reproduce
individual characteristics as well as the generic features common to the
family. I think it will also be admitted that the closer dogs can be bred
without loss of vitality the better, when the desire is to preserve type ;
for in-and-in-breeding is the best safeguard against throwing back to
any one of, it may be, the somewhat discordant elements out of which
the breed was originally formed.

That the white English terrier is sufficiently established as to breed
true, a litter out of Mr. Alfred Benjamin’s Sylph by Silvio, by Joe out
of Sylph, shows as far as one instance can do. I have had many oppor-
tunities of seeing them, and they all show the main characteristics of
the breed in a decided manner.

As to points, with the exception of colour, they may be judged by
those of the black and tan terrier—they should be pure white, the eye
small and black, the nose black, the head well balanced, level, and
gradually tapering. The ears are always cropped, which is a great pity,
for some of them have naturally pretty drop ears, thin and neat.
Smartness of build, a close, dense, but smooth coat, and what is known
as a “ terrier expression,” are desiderata, and as already said, the wheel
back and hooped tail, inherited from no very remote ancestor, are very
objectionable, and are generally accompanied by a soft “unvarmint”
look.

Mr. Alfred Benjamin’s Silvio: Age, about 3 years ; weight, 221b.;
height at shoulder, 16£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 25in. ;
length of tail, 8£in.; girth of chest, 19£in. ; girth of loin, 16in.; girth
of head, 12in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 7in.; girth of leg lin.
below elbow, 4£in.; girth of muzzle, 6in.; colour, white.

﻿The Airedale or Bingley Terrier.

377

Chapter XXVII.—THE AIREDALE OR BINGLEY
TERRIER.

By Corsincon.

The following first appeared in the “Country” newspaper, and led to
correspondence, in which I was nrged by breeders and owners to call the
dog the Airedale, not the Bingley Terrier, as being more applicable,
the breed not being restricted to Bingley, bnt well known all over that
district of Yorkshire as Airedale.

“ I have,” I then wrote, “no intention of setting up a new breed, or to
claim that I have manufactured one ; I merely take the liberty of giving
what appears to me a suitable name to an old and established variety
manufactured by accident or design probably before I was born. The
dog I allude to has already got ‘ a local habitation,’ and names enough
to pick and choose from, and yet I have ventured to give him another
in my gallery of ‘ dogs of the day.’

‘ ‘ My reasons for doing so are that Bingley terrier is a more ready name
and less confusing than some of his cognomens—‘ broken-haired or
working terrier,’ for instance, by which title he is called in dog show
catalogues ; a name which, although correctly descriptive of my Bingley
terrier, is equally so of quite a legion of British dogs that differ from
him widely in many points.

“ Then I have so many precedents for adopting a local name. There is
the Yorkshire terrier, that was wont to be called the Scotch terrier, and
still is by some committees of shows and others, for no apparent reason,
except that it is so unlike the Scotch terrier proper; the Aberdeen terrier,
a varmint little dog, which the Scotch Terrier Club also call the Scotoh
terrier, and also probably for no other reason than that he is not ; there
is, too, the Manchester terrier, the Bedlington terrier, and others with
cognomens borrowed from the localities whence they sprung or where
they abound. 1 might, it is true, have called it with much propriety the
Airedale terrier, for the Agricultural Society ‘ of that ilk ’ appear to
have at their shows taken him specially under their fostering care ; bnt
then they make Bingley their head-quarters, and at Bingley Show of all
others, in my experience, he is to be met with in mnoh the strongest foroe,﻿37§

British Dogs.

both in quantity and quality. Or, yet again, I might have called him
‘ The Waterside Terrier,’ for by that also he is known well, and a very
applicable name it is for this rough-and-tumble customer, who is equally
happy wet or dry, and is not to be excelled in questing and hunting,
either game or vermin, by land or water; but, applicable as it is, I fear
the partisans of several other kinds would, with good show of justice, lay
equal claim to it, and, what is more, prove their right; so, although he
may be—indeed, is—par excellence the waterside terrier of his native vales,
I cannot give him an exclusive right to the title, and fall back on my
selection, the Bingley Terrier, as being at once short, unambiguous,
distinctive, and easily said—which is in itself no mean advantage.

“The ‘ Bingley Terrier,’ as I shall call the dog, gives one the impression
of being a sort of giant relation of the Dandie Dinmont and the Bedlington.
That he has a lot of hound blood in him, whether the infusion be recent
or remote, there can be no doubt, and I hold that both the other breeds
have the same. He is considerably larger than either, ranging from 351b.
to 451b., very strongly built, the ribs rounder, and the haunches wider and
more muscular than the Bedlington, and he is much longer in the leg, and
consequently proportionately shorter in the body than the Dandie; he is,
like the latter, very strong in the jaw, and the whole head is large; the
ears fall close to the cheeks, rather wider and shorter for the size of the
dog than in either of the other two breeds ; the neck rather strong than
neat; the whole body stout and compact, and good muscular shoulders,
over useful straight strong legs and good feet; the hind quarters are firm
and square, finished off by a thick coarsish tail, docked to about 6in. or
7in.; the coat is a right useful one, short, and broken, much harder to
the feel than it looks, being a good mixture of hard and soft hair, and, in
fact, just the coat to get dry after an immersion with a few good shakes
and a roll in the grass; the prevailing colour is grizzle of various shades
with tan, variously distributed, but showing a saddle back with tan legs,
tan about face, &c., and with the hair on the top of the head lighter and
much softer than on the body, as in both Bedlingtons and Dandies.

“I am told he is generally a generous-dispositioned, good tempered
dog, bold and resolute in work, very hardy, the day never being too
wet, too cold, or too long for him, so long as there is sport; and whether
for rat or otter, duck or water hen, he is equally good, unexcelled in
nose, eager at questing, and as game as obedient.”﻿The Airedale or Bingley Terrier.

379

The following descriptive points of the Airedale terrier have been
drawn np by breeders and supplied to me by Mr. H. B. Knight, Chapel
Allerton, near Leeds :

Head, flat, and of good width between the ears.

Muzzle, long, but by no means light, the nose being black, the
nostrils large, and the lips free from “flews.”

Jaw, strong.

Mouth, level.

Eyes, small, bright, and dark in colour.

Ears, thin, and somewhat larger, in proportion to the size of the
dog, than a fox terrier’s, carried forward like the latter’s, but set on
more towards the side of the head, devoid of all long, silky hair, and
without the least tendency to “fall.”

Neck, strong, rather than neat, and free from dewlap and throatiness.

Shoulders, well sloped.

Chest, full and wide, but not too deep.

Hind-quarters, square, and showing a good development of muscle.
Thighs well bent.

Back, of moderate length, with short and muscular loins.

Bibs, well sprung and rounded, affording ample scope for the action
of the lungs.

Legs, straight, and well furnished with bone.

Feet, round, and with no tendency to “ spread.”

Tail, stout, and docked from 4in. to 7in.

Coat, broken or rough, and hard in texture.

Colour, a bluish grey, of various shades, from the occiput to root of
tail, showing a “ saddle back ” of same, also a slight indication on each
cheek; rest of body a good tan, richer on feet, muzzle, and ears than
elsewhere.

Weight, from 401b. to 551b. for dogs, and from 351b. to 501b. for
bitches.

The following are weights and measurements of a few of the breed :

Mr. Matthew Hainsworth’s CracJc : Age, 1 year; weight, 531b.; height
at shoulder, 23in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 35in.; length of
tail, 7in.; girth of chest, 26£in.; girth of loin, 20in.; girth of head,
17in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 8in.; girth of leg lin. below
elbow, 6Jin.; length of head from ocoiput to tip of nose, lOin.; girth of﻿380

British Dogs.

muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, lOin.; colour and markings,
dark mingle back, tan legs and bead, wire haired, tan ears.

Mr. Joseph Jackson’s Young Drummer: Age, 16 months ; weight,
521b.; height at shoulder, 23in. ; length from nose to set on of tail,
36in. ; length of tail, 5in. ; girth of chest, 29in.; girth of loin, 23in. ;
girth of head, 17in. ; girth of arm lin. above elbow,lOin. ; girth of leg
lin. below elbow, 7in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
9fin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, ll£in.;
colour and markings, grizzle back, tan legs.


Chapter XXVIII.—THE ABERDEEN TERRIER.

By Corsincon.

Varieties of the dog multiply, and in no class more than in the
terriers. At one time “ terrier ” was the generic name for all and every
vermin dog that was used to go to ground, and the name was restricted
in its application to dogs so used, as indeed the term implies.

Now, however, its application has been broadened, and many varieties
are included in it that are far from being “ earth dogs,” their size alone
forbidding they should follow even the badger into his “ lurking angles,
dark dungeons, and close caves,” whilst they would scarcely get their
head into the holt of the otter, or some of the narrow and tortuous
passages in which sly Reynard seeks shelter. Others, again, are so
small, soft, and toyish they would not fright a mouse. The Aberdeen
terrier is not of either of these kinds, for, although varying in size
considerably, none are such small and silken toys as to be out of the
working class, and none of them are too big to prevent them doing the
real work of the terrier. They are about as “varmint” a looking set
as I ever saw, rough-and-tumble customers, that will stand any work
and any weather, however rough, that such a multum in parvo of
strength, hardiness, and pluck as a good specimen represents can by the
utmost stretch of physical laws be expected to perform. Shorter in the﻿The Aberdeen Terrier.

381

leg, and not bo nimble as the old hard-coated Scotoh terrier, they equally
show the true terrier “fire” in their eagerness for the fray, and the
indomitable courage, the ‘ ‘ dourness ’ ’ with which they hold on, marking
them as real “ die-hards ” among the terrier race.

Those who saw the prize winners in the Scotch terrier olasses at the
Alexandra Palace Show, 1879, saw the stamp of the Aberdeen terrier,
and it seems to me a very great pity that the Kennel Club Show should
on that occasion have been used so to misdirect public opinion, and
to stultify the judgments previously given at their shows, when terriers
nearer the type, or at least built more closely on the lines of the old
Scotch terrier, won.

There is much in the general appearance of the Aberdeen Terrier that
suggests to the mind a Skye terrier in the rough. Low on the leg, long
in the back, an abundance of bone and muscle, a rough hide covering
a big heart, a concentration of strength, a head of the useful punishing
sort, and a countenance lit up by a keen and piercing eye, he is the
best and merriest of companions for those who esohew the “pretty”
and prefer in their peregrinations round the homestead to have the
society of a dog that will take the sow by the ear and turn her out of
the garden, or that if a rat presents itself, it is “dead for a ducat ”
before you can utter the words.

These dogs have natural priok ears, the muzzle is a medium length,
teeth strong and level set, the whole body covered with a very hard coat
of the horsehair texture taken from the mane, and about an average of a
couple of inches in length. A dog’s coat as hard as “ pig’s bristles or
pin wire,” as it is often said to be, J have never met with, and I hope I
never shall.

I am quite sure these dogs—which, I understand, are plentiful not
only in Aberdeen but throughout the north-eastern oounties of Scotland
—only require to be better known among English terrier lovers to be
appreciated, and as I know several gentlemen in the south have taken
to them and are breeding them, I have good hopes ere long of seeing
classes for Aberdeen terriers at our shows.

The following are measurements of a couple of the breed :

A bitoh owned by Mr. H. B. Gibbs: Age, about 3J years ; weight, 171b.;
height at shoulder, 8£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 30£in.;
length of tail, 7in. ; girth of chest, 18£in.; girth of loin, 13£in.; girth of﻿382

British Dogs.

head, 12£in. ; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 6in.; length of head from
occiput to tip of noae, 7in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and
tip of nose, 65m. ; colour and markings, red.

A dog owned by Mr. H. D. Gibbs : Age, 4 years ; weight, 181b. ; height
at shoulder, 9in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 25£in. ; length of
tail, 8in.; girth of chest, 19-jin. ; girth of loin, 15iin. ; girth of head,
13in. ; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 6in.; length of head from occiput
to tip of nose, 7iin. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of
nose, 7in. ; colour and markings, dark steel grey.

Chapter XXIX.—DOG SHOWING.

By Corsincon.

The exhibition of dogs has taken a strong hold on popular fancy, and is
now a source of interest and pleasure to thousands in this country.

When fairly and honestly conducted, competition at these exhibitions
gives rise to healthy excitement, and furnishes a stimulus to breeders to
still further improve the several varieties of dogs..

Every season brings with it a new set of exhibitors spiritedly entering
the arena, and courageously endeavouring to wrest the coveted laurels
from those who have been earlier in the field and won successes.

It often happens that the tyro in exhibiting meets with most dis-
heartening rebuffs through his own ignorance of, or inattention to,
matters without which success is impossible.

I desire to point out, as clearly as I can, for the benefit of inexperienced
exhibitors, rules of conduct and treatment in preparation for competi-
tion, each and all of which it isnecessary more or less closely to observe, in
order to succeed. First and foremost let me impress on the young exhibitor
to make up his mind firmly never to entertain even the desire to win by
resort to any subterfuge, dodge, or trick ; unfortunately such things are
done, but also, fortunately, by the few, otherwise, what honourably fol-
lowed is a most interesting pursuit, would speedily loose character, and
become that which no man of self-respect could take part in.

Forthcoming dog Bhows are announced in the various newspapers that﻿Dog Showing.

383

treat of canine subjects, and the first thing the intending exhibitor has to
do is to select at which show his dog shall compete. Before doing so, a
schedule of prizes offered, with copy of rules, should be obtained from the
secretary. Bead carefully the conditions under which you can exhibit; if
you approve of them, fill up the entry form according to the requirements,
and in all things abide rigidly by the rules to which you have subscribed.

Having determined to show, you have now to consider the amount of
preparation your dog requires, so that on the day of competition he may
be shown at his best.

Many people are disposed to treat the condition in which a dog is
shown too lightly; it is really of great importance, it adds or detracts
much from the good impression the dog should make on the mind of
the judge if the animal is to stand a chance of winning. Of course
condition is not everything, still rank bad ones at times have won
through the splendid form in which they were shown, for superficial
polish does much in creating a favourable impression at first sight.
True, he is but a poor judge who can mistake veneer for solid mahogany,
but be your mahogany of the very highest quality it should not be need-
lessly handicapped by being exhibited in a dirty and unprepared state.

Some dogs require but little preparation, the main thing in all breeds
is to have them in perfect health, so that they shall be seen to advantage
through the fire and vigour of life displaying their forms to the best.

Fatness is not required in any breed of dogs. It throws the natural
form out of proportion, and, whilst it may hide faults, it, on the other
hand, obliterates good points. In all—and especially is it seen to effect
in Bmooth haired varieties—there should be flesh hard and firm, with
the sinews brought up and standing out like cords ; nothing like softness
or flabbiness should appear. This is specially required in such breeds as
greyhounds, bnlldogs, pointers, terriers, &c. In bloodhounds and mastiffs
attention to condition is often neglected, and they are to be seen loaded
with fat and looking as soft and unwieldly as prize pigs. In all breeds,
long or short coated, excess of adipose matter causes sluggishness of
aotion, whereas activity is a great characteristic of all dogs in health.

To get dogs into the best condition for exhibition attention to numerous
matters of detail are necessary, and may best be here considered
separately. First :	,

Constitution and State of Health.—No trainer of greyhounds who can﻿384

British Dogs.

hope to be successful treats his dogs as if they were lumps of inorganio
matter, to be individually kneaded by identical prooesses into exactly the
same thing.

Dogs vary in constitution, and on that depends the amount and quality
of the training he must receive in preparation for a show; some are gross
feeders, others very dainty ; some are naturally disposed to lay on flesh,
others the reverse; and these and many other peculiarities will be
observed and acted on by the intelligent kennelman. Again, the state of
health at the time the dog is to commence his preparation must not be
overlooked. A single dose of physic will rarely do harm, and if the dog
is sluggish, and especially if there appears a tinge of yellowness about
the eyes, such a pill as the following will be most suitable : Podophyllin
resin 3gr., powdered rhubarb 24gr., powdered compound extract of
colocynth 36gr., extract of henbane 24gr., mixed and divided into
twenty-four pills, two of which should be sufficient for the largest breeds,
and others in proportion. It should be made a rule in giving dogs pills
which are to act on the bowels that they have soft sloppy food the day
before, and also the day the pill is given. For toy and very delicate dogs
a dose of castor oil and syrup of buckthorn combined may be sub-
stituted.

It should also be considered whether the dog is at the time infested by
worms. Few dogs escape these pests, and, although some dogs remain
fat and sleek whilst enduring their presence, as a rule the animal has an
unthrifty look ; the food he takes seems to do him no good, the coat is
either harsh or constantly coming off, and, under these oircumstances,
the extra feeding and all the nnusual care to get him fit is thrown away.
A vermifuge or worm medicine, judiciously selected and properly given,
may always be tried with safety and hope of advantage, and if worms are
present it should be repeated in a week. The time to give it is the morn-
ing, after the purge has been administered, and, whatever the worm
medicine, it should be followed by a dose of olive or castor oil in two
hours. Areca nut is a good vermifuge ; it should be given freshly grated,
and a sound and heavy nut selected—a worm-eaten nut, as many of them
are, is of no value. The dose may be taken as two grains for every
pound weight of the dog. Spratts Patent Cnre for Worms is in the
form of a powder very easily given, and I have found this invariably
effective in expelling worms of all kinds, and safe to give even to the﻿Dog Showing.

3^5

most delicate dogs. They are also remarkably cheap, and are, in fact,
invaluable as a kennel adjunct. Oil of male fern often proves most effec-
tive as a vermifuge; the dose is from ten drops to forty drops, and, from
its irritating effect on the coats of the stomach causing vomiting, it
should be given sheathed in such a vehicle as mucilage of acacia.

Dainty feeders are sometimes much benefited by a course of tonics,
which stimulates the appetite and assists in digestion and assimilation.
I have found cinchona most suitable, and, perhaps, the liquid extract of
the bark is the most convenient form.

Feed/mg.—I do not think it wise to adopt any strict formula in feeding,
muoh must be left to the observation of the feeder, who will see that
what does well for one does not answer with another in getting the dog
up in firm fleBh and muscle ; sloppy food and fat, and fat-making articles
should be avoided. Many make the mistake of changing the diet
suddenly from a comparatively poor one to a rich one, and gorge their
dogs with flesh, with the consequence of throwing more work on to the
assimilative organs than they can perform, and hence we have a break out
of Burfeit or blotch just at the time we want the dog’s skin to be faultless
and his coat to be bright .and clean.

Supposing a dog’s ordinary fare to be ordinary dog biscuits, with,
perhaps, house scraps or some equivalent for them added, there should
be no change further than the gradual addition of more, perfectly lean
meat, and, if this is stewed, the biscuits broken, and the meat and liquid
from it poured over the biscuits previously broken, and covered up till
cold enough to give, and, with the addition daily of a modicum of boiled
green vegetables, no fetter food for training on can be given. If this
plan be judiciously followed, the dog may towards the finish be having
about equal parts meat and biscuits. Two meals a day are, as a rule,
best, and regularity is of great importance.

Exercise.—It is imperative that, whilst thus highly fed, the dog should
be regularly exercised—some will require clothing when having walking
exeroise, and especially if it is necessary to take off excess of fat—what-
ever kind of exeroise is given, whether walking with a horse or in slipping
them for spurts, it Bhould be regular, and managed to suit the strength of
the dog—of course, with some breeds this is unnecessary. These re-
marks are designed to assist those who already have mastered the elements
of dog management. The exeroise Bhould always be given before feeding,

c c﻿386

British Dogs.

and immediately on the return to the kennel the process of grooming
should be undertaken.

Qrooming.—This is far more important than many people suppose. It
is not merely for cleanliness, although that in itself is much, for dirt is,
in all forms, as injurious to health as it is offensive to the senses ; but
judicious grooming not only brightens the coat, giving to it a lustre
additional to that of health, but it develops the muscles, and thereby
improves the form.

In long coated dogs an ordinary stable dandy brush suits in some, in
others the metallic brushes, specially designed for the kennel by Messrs.
Ashworth, of Manchester, answer best. In smooth coated dogs Dine-
ford’s hound glove answers well, but even the old fashioned hard straw
swab works wonders if there be patience and elbow greaBe behind it.
It is very important that the friction be applied along the line of the
muscles; the groom must not, for instance, rub down the top of the dog’s
back, but along each side of the spine, right from occiput to stem,
and particularly at the loin where bands of sinewB connect the hind-
quarters with the trunk.

Washing.—When this is necessary is should be done with consideration.
The water should be not more than tepid. Soda, potash, or any strong
alkali should be avoided, as they rob the coat of its natural yelk.
Carbolic acid soaps, too, make the coat harsh and dry.

The best water softener and cleanser for our purpose is Hudson’s
extract of soap, sold by grocers in Id. packets, and by far the best
soap yet introduced is the dog soap, made by Spratts patent, it is equal
in quailty to a toilet soap, is non-poisonous to animals, yet a perfeot
insecticide, killing fleas, lice, and ticks instantly, and being colourless, or
nearly so, is far more suitable for washing white dogs than others.

In cases where the hair has become matted it will be easier combed
out when saturated with water.

Always finish by thoroughly rinsing in clear water with the chill taken
off, and in the case of white dogs if the water is tinged with indigo blue
it improves their appearance.

Drying should be most thorough. In the case of large dogs those who
can let them have a roll among clean straw will do well to do so, bub
small pets should be hand dried, before a fire or in the Bun.

Putting the Polish on.—After all has been done it will be found that﻿Dog Showing.

387

dogs, like children, are at war with artificial smartness, or that at the last
moment, to ensure that the work of the past has not been spoiled, just
before showing, the dog should be looked over, brushed, combed, or wiped
over, as the case requires ; and, in fact, hare the final polish put on.

FaJcvng.—I do not know how this word came into kennel use ; its very
existence in connection with dogs shows it is a disgrace to us.

I am disposed to think it was first applied to the cutting the cartilage
of fox terriers’ ears, so as to give them the desired set or fold, and
Dr. Ogilvie’s definition of the word is in that sense. The word now,
however, has in kennel oircles a wider application, and Fieroe Egan’B
meaning of the word, as given in his slang dictionary, is, unfortunately,
the correct one, when the word is used in reference to the “ tricks of
the ring,” namely, to cheat or swindle.

Unfortunately it has not yet been defined what is to be considered
“faking,” and what legitimate preparation for exhibition. I cannot for
the life of me see why a fox terrier man may not make an incision in
his dog’s ear, if a bull terrier man may cut three parts of his dog’s ear
away, the object of both being to artificially improve the appearance.
Again, if shaving or trimming with soissors is permissible in one breed,
why should not the cutting out of a piece of white from the chest of a
black spaniel be so also P

I am opposed to all such practices, and I cannot help thinking that
the Kennel Club, who have taken upon themselves the welfare and
gnidanoe of canine matters in this country, should find it among their
most urgent duties to define faking; and, as far as their power and
influence extends, put laws against these malpractices in force. That is
supposing the Kennel Club to be in earnest about anything more than
their own interests, which, however, their conduct of canine matters
often leads me to doubt.

Full terriers and others are clipped, trimmed, and shaved. I have
even seen the whiskers shaved off a fox terrier. Fox terriers, and some-
times other dogs, have an ear with an awkward oonque let down with
the knife or the needle.

Bedlington terriers have the rough hair on their faces, and sometimes
elsewhere, pulled out. Blaok and tans are done with lampblack and oil.
Yorkshire toys are not always innocent of plumbago ; even dogs for field
sports are subjected to such processes that their owners are ashamed to

C c 2﻿388

British Dogs.

own to it, and the “faking,” if faking it be, is always done sub rosa. I
do not know that to use the watering can on the back of a curly retriever
just before taking him in the ring can be called faking, but pulling the
coat of the same dog is, and yet that practice is, if not approved, winked
at by those in authority.

I have no wish to spread a knowledge of faking further than to ensure
contempt for it, and its thorough condemnation by all good men and true,
hoping that public opinion may ere long bring about reforms whioh those
who have assumed the reins in canine matters seem to have no heart to
undertake.

Sending to Show.—Having made your entry you will in due course
have received address label and a metal number with instructions what to
do with them.

Let these instructions be obeyed to the smallest minutiae, or you may
give the show authorities unnecessary trouble, and yourself also.

Basket or Box.—The comfort of the dog in transit may considerably
affect his chances of winning. A close box without efficient means for the
admission of fresh air and the emission of that which has been consumed
and altered in process of respiration is sure to cause illness, if not death,
a plain sided box with a few holes bored in it does not do, many instances
of suffocation have occurred through this, or through packing two in a
box only big enough for one. This is false economy, for if suffocation
escapes the dogs, one is almost sure to Buffer, and the want of sufficient
air, together with the excitement of the journey, not unfrequently brings
on a sudden attack of diarrhoea. Give space commensurate with the size
of the animals, and provide air in like ratio. If your box is flat topped
have ventilation secured by square pieces cut out of top and sides, and
over these strong iron rods bent outwards, so that nothing placed on or
against it can lie flush, and prevent ingress of air. Have strong handles
to the box, it is a convenience to railway porters, and removes the
temptation to indulge in what appears to be a natural tendency in them,
viz., to turn everything they handle upside down, whether it oontain a
live creature or not.

Baskets, because of their lightness, are preferred for Bmall dogs, but if
used for terriers they should be lined inside with perforated zino, or they
will seldom last a journey.

In the Bing.—It is the right and duty of every one to show bis dog﻿Standard of Excellence.

389

before the judge to the best possible advantage, but nothing is gained
by forcing a dog on the judge’s attention obtrusively ; often the reverse
effect is the consequence. It is a great advantage with most dogs to be
led by those they know, as it gives them confidence, and they show
themselves better. All dogs intended to be shown should have been
previously accustomed to be led, for if not the odds are great that they
will resent it when in the ring, and by pulling back and wriggling about
make it impossible for the judge to form a true opinion, and the dog’s
ohanee of winning is thereby lost.

Last of all, whatever the fiat of the judge, keep your temper. If you
think the judge wrong, at least let him finish his work undisturbed
either by your grumbling or by reasonable question. Your interest in
the show may be over with the judging of a class, but the judge has to go
on with his work olass after class, and it is no more than just to him to
let him finish his work undisturbed.

Chapter XXX.—STANDARD OF EXCELLENCE

FOR DOGS USEFUL TO MAN.

/.—Rough Coated Colley.

Points.

Head and muzzle ............ 15

Eyes aud ears ............... 5

Neck and shoulders ......... 10

Body, ohest, baok, loin ...	15

Hindquarters, legs, and feet 15

Coat ....................... 20

Colour....................... 5

Tail ........................ 5

Symmetry and condition ...	10

Total ................100

//.—Smooth Colley.

The same points, exoept that ten
points be taken from the coat
and given to symmetry.

III.—Bearded Colley.

Rarely shown, and no soale of
poiota have been allotted.

IV.—Bob Tailed Sheep
Dog.

The same scale as for the Rough
Colley.

V.—Esquimaux Dog.

No scale of points allotted.

VI.—North	American

Wolf Dog.

No soale of points allotted.

VII.—Truffle Dog.

No soale of points allotted.﻿390

British Dogs.

VIII.—The Bull Dog.			XI.—Newfoundland. p0iNTs.	
The Club scale.			Head 		20
General appearance ...		10	Ears and eyes 		5
Skull 			15	Neck and shoulders 		10
Stop 			5	Body, chest, baok, loin	15
Eyes 			5	Legs and feet 		15
Ears 			5	Coat 		10
Face 			5	Colour		5
Chop 			5	Tail 		5
Mouth			5	Size and symmetry 		15
Neck and chest 			5		
Shoulders 			5	Total 		100
Body 			5		
Back 			5	XII.—Dalmatian.	PmNTfl	
Tail 			5	Head 		10
Legs and feet 			10	Neck 		5
Coat 			5	Body, chest, back, loins ...	15
Size 			5	Legs and feet 		15
			Tail 		5
Total 			100	Coat 		5
			Colour		10
IX.—The Mastiff.	Points.		- Markings 	  Symmetry and condition ...	25  10
Head 			20		
Eyes 			5	Total 		100
Ears 			5		
Muzzle	  Neck 	  Shoulders and chest ...		5	XIII.—Thibet Mastiff.	
		10	No scale of points allotted.	
Back and loins 			10	XIV.—Great Dane.	
Legs and feet 			10		
Coat 			5	No scale of points allotted.	
Colour			5		
Tail 			5	XV.—German Mastiff	or
Size and symmetry ...		15	Boarhound.	
Total 		...	100	No scale of points allotted.	
X.—St. Bernard.			XVI.—Fox Terrier.	
	Points.		Head and ears 		15
Head and muzzle		20	Neck 		5
Eyes and ears 			5	Shoulders and chest		15
Neck and shoulders ...		10	Back and loin 		10
Chest, back, and loin		15	Hindquarters 		5
Legs and feet 			15	Stern 		5
Coat 			10	Legs and feet 		20
Colour and its distribution		10	Coat 		10
Size and symmetry		15	Symmetry and character ...	15
				

Total ...	...... 100	Total ...	... 100﻿Standard of Excellence.

391

X VII.— Wire-haired Fox
Terrier.

The same as Fox Terrier.

XVIII.—Dandie Dinmont

Terrier.	points.

Head .................... 10

Eyes .................... 10

Ears .................... 10

Neck ..................... 5

Body .................... 20

Tail ..................... 5

Legs and feet ........... 10

Coat .................... 15

Colour.................... 5

Size and weight........... 5

General appearance ....... 5

Total	100

XIX.-Bedlington Terrier.

Points.

Head .................... 20

Ears ..................... 5

Eyes ..................... 5

Nose ..................... 5

Jaws and teeth........... 10

Neck and shoulders ....... 5

Body, ribs, back, loins,
quarters, and chest ...	15

Legs and feet ............ 5

Coat .................... 15

Colour.................... 5

Tail ..................... 5

Weight ................... 5

Total ...	... 100

Black and Tan	Terrier
(contd.)	Points.
Chest 			 10
Loin 			 10
Legs and feet		 10
Coat 			 5
Colour			 25
Tail 			 5
Symmetry 			 5
Total 		... 100

XXI.—Skye Terrier.

Head 		Points.  ...	15
Ears and eyes 		... 10
Coat, length and texture	... 20
Colour		...	5
Body 		... 20
Legs and feet 		...	15
Tail ...				...	5
Symmetry and condition	... 10
Total 		... 100

XXII.—Bull Terrier

Skull 		Points. ... 15
Jaws and teeth		... 10
Ears 		...	5
Neck 		...	5
Shoulders and chest ...	...	15
Back 		... 10
Legs and feet 		... 15
Coat 		...	5
Colour		...	5
Tail 		...	5
Symmetry 		... 10
Total 		... 100

XX.—Black and	Tan
Terrier.	Points.
Head 		...	5
Jaws and teeth		... 6
Eyes 		...	5
Ears 		...	5
Neck and shoulders ...	... 10

XXIII.—Scotch Terrier.

Points.

Skull ....................... 10

JawB and teeth............... 10

Eyes ......................... 5

Ears ......................... 5﻿392

British Dogs.

Scotch Terrier (contd.)

Neck 		Points.  ...	5
Body 		... 20
Legs and feet 	  Tail 		... 15 ...	5
Coat 		...	5
Colour		...	5
Condition and symmetry	... 10
Total 		... 100

XXIV.—Irish Terrier.

(Drawn np by Mr. G. R. Krehl,
English Vice-president of the
Irish Terrier Club.)

Points.

Head and jaw .............. 15

Ears ....................... 5

Coat ...................... 15

Feet and legs ............. 15

Back, loin, and stem (in-
cluding general make of

body) .................. 15

Colour..................... 10

Shoulders and chest......	10

Hindquarters ............... 5

Neck ....................... 5

Size ....................... 5

Total ...	 100

XX V.— White English

Terrier.	PoiNTO.

Head ..................... 10

Jaws and teeth............ 10

Eyes ...................... 5

Ears ............... ...	5

Neck and shoulders ....... 10

Chest .................... 10

Back ..................... 10

Legs and feet ............ 15

Coat ...................... 5

Colour..................... 5

Tail ...................... 5

Symmetry and condition ...	10

Total ................100

XXVI.—Airedale Terrier.

Points.

Head .................... 10

Jaws and teeth........... 10

Eyes and ears ........... 10

Neck ..................... 5

Shoulders and chest....	15

Back and hindquarters ...	20

Legs and feet ........... 10

Tail ..................... 5

Coat and colour.......... 10

Condition ................ 5

Total ................100

XXVII. Aberdeen Terrier.

Same valuation of points as in
Scotch Terrier.﻿DIVISION III.

House and Toy Dogs.﻿﻿﻿﻿GROUP I.

Dogs which are distinct varieties from those
already described.

Including :

1.	The Blenheim Spaniel.

2.	The King Charles

Spaniel,
j. The Pug.

The Pomeranian.

The Poodle.

The Maltese Terrier.
The Yorkshire Terrier.

This group, with some of those included in the next,
are pre-eminently the ladies’ dogs, and form the
natural class of lap dogs. In outward form they vary
much from each other, so that from the naturalist’s
point of view they occupy positions far asunder. The
poodle, pugt and toy spaniels have short round skulls
and truncated muzzles, and in these respects the others
included in the group are just the opposite) and it is
only their holding the same relative position to man as
the toys and pets of the canine race that justifies their
being grouped together.

Chapter I.—TOY SPANIELS.

By Corsincon.

At what date in the history of the human race ladies took to caressing
small dogs I do not know, but the fashion is a very old one, and has been
a very general one, if not universal, among nations at all advanoed in
civilisation.

D D 2﻿396

British Dogs.

The fashion only ohanges in the selection of the reigning favourite, and
caprice ordains that the bandy-legged dachshund, lolling in the lap of
luxury yesterday, may, by the fickle goddess, be to-day dethroned in
favour of that natty little dandy, the Yorkshire terrier, who, in his turn,
struts his brief span of power upon the stage, most tyranically governing
the mistress who lavishes the exuberance of her affections upon him, till
he again has to give place to some aspiring and successful rival.

In this country, at the present day, we see the taste for dogs of all
kinds more developed and indulged in than, probably, at any previous
period in the world’s history ; and the number of varieties of toy dogs is
now so increased, and the tastes shown in their selection as lap dogs so
varied, that it would be difficult indeed to ascribe to any one breed
an ascendancy over the others in that most enviable position so many of
them occupy in the affections of the ladies.

Toy spaniels, of one kind or another, seem to be the oldest of our
ladies’ favourites. Dr. Caius, 1576, calls him the “ Spaniell gentle, or the
comforter, a chamber companion, a pleasant playfellow, a pretty worme,
generally called Canis delicatus,” and adds, “ These puppies the smaller
they be the more pleasure they provoke, as more meet playfellows for
mincing mistresses to bear in their bosoms, to keepe company withal in
their chambers, to succour with sleep in bed, and nourish with meat at
board, to lay in their laps and lick their lips as they ride in their wag-
gons ; and good reason it should be so, for coarseness with fineness hath
no fellowship, but featness with neatness hath neighbourhood enough.”

Jessop, in his “Researches into the History of the British Dog,”
gives the above quotation, but ascribes it, and the severe censure on the
ladies for the lavishness with which they caressed their pets,—which the
learned doctor, who was a great moraliser, did not omit,—to Harrison,
writer of the description given in Hollingshead’s “History,” edition,
1585; quite overlooking the words of Harrison himself, who says, “How-
beit the learned doctor Cains, in his Latin treatise upon (sic) “ Gesner de
canibus Anglicis,” bringeth them [that is, English dogs] all into three
sorts,—that is, the gentle kind serving the game, the homely kind for
sundrie uses, and the currish kind meet for many toies,—for my part I
can say no more of them than he hath done already, wherefore, I will
here set down only a Bum of that which he hath written of their names
and natures.”﻿Toy Spaniels.

397

The italics are mine, as I wish to emphasise Harrison’s words for a
reason whioh will presently disclose itself. Harrison admittedly merely
quoted Cains, and, by inference, I should say from the Latin text in
whioh Cains’ s book on English dogs was originally written; although
Abraham Fleming’s English translation of Caius’s book,* printed in
London, 1576, two years before the death of Caius, was open to him.

Now, according to Fleming, the description of the toy spaniel given by
Caius runs, “ these puppies the smaller they be the more pleasure they
provoke;” but in Harrison’s quotation, after the words “the smaller they
be,” the following important words appear, “and, thereto, if they have an
hole in the fore parts of their heads the better are they accepted.”

Whether Fleming overlooked and omitted this sentence in his transla-
tion, or Harrison interpolated it, I am unable to say; but it is just
possible that Caius himself had omitted the mention of this point of
importance, and that Harrison supplied the omission from his own know-
ledge of the fashionable toys of the period. Be that as it may, “ the
hole in the fore part of the head,” which we now call “ the stop,” is
eminently a characteristic of our modern toy spaniels, and it goes far to
prove that the toys of Queen Elizabeth’s time were true spaniels, and not
Maltese dogs, as Harrison says, inaocurately quoting Caius, who gives
Callemachus as his authority for calling them Meliteos, and giving
Malta as the place where they had their principal beginning.

Caius, throughout his book, more fully describes the character of each
breed than the differences in their physical features, of which he only
gives us glimpses ; and in inveighing against some of the practices of the
“dainty dames” who indulged in luxury these “pretty, proper, and
fyne” “ instruments of folly,” charged both the ladies and their dogs as
Sybaritioal; and as striot acouracy is not so marked a feature in Caius’s
book as a readiness on the part of the writer to be content with hearsay
evidenoe, even on points whioh the most gullible might be expected to
question, it is probable, I think, that the natural association of ideas
had more to do with his favouring the asoription of Malta as the original
home of those pets than any proof he had in favour of it.

I am disposed to think that not only is this speoial feature the indenta-
tion, or stop, in the forehead strong presumptive evidence in favour of

* “ Engliehe Dogges, by Johannes Cains, done into English, by Abraham
Fleming, 1576," a reprint of whioh, exaot in every particular, is now published at
170, Strand.﻿398

British Dogs.

the toy dogs of that time being true spaniels, but also that that pre-
sumption receives powerful corroborative support in Dr. Caius’s remarks
on the colours of spaniels in general, when he describes them thus, “ the
most part of their skins are white, and if they be marked with any spots
they are commonly red, and somewhat great therewithall, the hairs not
growing in such thickness but that the mixture of them may be easily
perceived. Others, some of them, be reddish and blackish, but of that
sort there be but a few.”

Now, although the latter is written of spaniels in general, I see no
reason against, but every reason for, taking it as applying to his spa/niel
delicatus with equal force as to the varieties used in the pursuit of game ;
and, if I am right, we had the colours of our two great varieties of toy
spaniels recognised and described more than 300 years ago.

That, at the present day, dogs have been considerably modified there
can be no doubt; ideas of what constitutes beauty changes, and dogs,
like ladies’ bonnets, have to be made to suit the prevailing fashion,
although some people seem, by persistent dinning into the ears of the
unthinking, to achieve ephemeral success in making or adopting a dog,
and then bringing fashion to smile upon it, much to their own benefit,
both in praise and profit.

The old name of the spaniel gentle “The Comforter” is still pre-
served in use by old fashioned folks. When a child, I had a red and
white toy spaniel which my seniors versed in dog matters, called a “Com-
forter, ’ ’ it was a pure Blenheim, and it or its parents had been obtained
from Blenheim Palace. “Trifle” stands out in my memory as a bright
and sprightly playfellow, good in all the points of a Blenheim, but that
by modern fanciers he would have been voted too long noBed.

The name “ Comforter” was an expressive one, when we consider the
belief that obtained with our ancesters, that by the dog being borne in
the bosom of afflicted persons, the patient was comforted, and often
cured, the disease passing out of the human frame into that of the dog.

Further remarks on toy spaniels will be more conveniently, and with
greater appropriateness, made in considering the two popular varieties—
the Blenheim and the King Charles spaniel.﻿The Blenheim Spaniel.

399

Chapter II.—THE BLENHEIM SPANIEL.

By Corsincon.

The modern Blenheim spaniel is a very different dog from the original
of that name, so long kept by and associated with the Marlborongh family.

It is an instance of the breeder’s skill exercised in a wrong direction, for
the noseless specimens with abnormally developed skulls I look upon as the
resnltB of a perverted taste obtained at the sacrifice of intrinsic qualities,
and without sufficient redeeming points to equalise the loss.

Whether the Blenheim may be reckoned as one of the “ Sybaritical
puppies ” of the “ daintie dames ” of Caius’ time may be doubted, and at
what date this little spaniel was taken under the fostering care of the
House of Marlborough, and became so closely connected with that illus-
trious family as to be given the name of their palace I do not know, but
there exists abundance of proofs that the dog now recognised at shows
as the Blenheim spaniel is greatly modified by crossings, and with
features the possession of which—although fashion demands them—
widely differs from the original.

An old writer, referring to the Blenheim spaniele of the end of last
century, Bays : “ The smallest spaniels passing under the denomination of
Cookers is that peouliar breed in the possession and preservation of the
Duke of Marlborough and his friends ; these are invariably red and white,
with very long ears, short noses, and black eyes; they are excellent and
indefatigable, being in great estimation with those sportsmen, who oan
become possessed of the breed.” What “ sportsman,” I wonder, would
hold in estimation many of the exhibited specimens of the day, animals
in whioh stamina and physique have been so utterly sacrificed that, instead
of being able or disposed to hunt, it is only a select few that possess
spirit and strength enough for a gambol. True, they are no longer
wanted to flush woodcocks or drive coneys, and the beautiful coat and
feather, which is one of the most attractive features of our modern dog,
would be destroyed for the time being, at least, by suoh work; but granted
that for the development of some desirable points of beauty the utility of
the dogs as workers must be to a greater or less extent sacrificed, I oan
Bee no good grounds for the natural and far more beautiful shape of﻿400

British Dogs.

head and muzzle of the original being superseded by the one in vogue.
The writer I have quoted describes the nose as short, but the present
fashion is to encourage the noseless, and, indeed, Mr. Julius, about two
years ago, exhibited several almost, if not quite noseless, which he named
“the noseless,” in ridicule, as I understood, of the present fashion, for
he has exhibited several great beauties with a development of nose more
in accordance with Nature’s designs and the dog’s requirements, and, I
might add, the comfort of the owner.

There are few things more annoying and disagreeable than the noisy
breathing and snuffling of these artifically short-nosed pets, unless it be
the paralysed protruding tongue, which is a concomitant evil. Let us
have a short-nosed dog by all means—the best authorities describe the
original as such—but that is a very different thing from a nose so
deformed that it can only exercise the functions of that organ so indif-
ferently as to make the animal a nuisance.

I am quite aware that it is practically useless to attack or oppose the
omnipotent goddess Fashion, but I comfort myself with the reflection that
she is as capricious as powerful—only wear a thing long enough and it is
sure to come in, were it only a broad-brimmed hat, and I do not despair
of seeing that occult power exercise her influence on Blenheims in a
more sensible direction than at present.

“ Idstone,” a most trustworthy authority on the breed, expresses my
views so entirely—views I held long before his book was published—that
I quote and adopt his words : “ I would allow (indeed I would, insist upon)
a deep indentation between the eyes, added to the high skull and a
moderately short face ; but the projecting lower jaw, the frog mouth, and
the broken nose, free from all cartilage, I decidedly object to. Such
animals are offensive from their snuffling and snoring ; and if tolerated
in sanded parlours are not fit to be admitted into drawing rooms, where I
should expect to see a spaniel with a pretty face, well coated all over,
large eared, large eyed, rich coloured, with a bushy flag, well feathered
feet, and diminutive in stature, in preference to the snuffling apple-
headed, idiotic animals too often bred by ‘ the fancy,’ and which ought to be
discouraged ; though, if judging, I would not put them aside until some
definite conclusion had been arrived at, as an adverse decision would be
unfair to the exhibitor during the present state of things.”

The points of the Blenheim and King Charles spaniel, taking the﻿The Blenheim. Spaniel.

401

present style of show dog as the type, are closely identical; the greatest
difference is, of course, the colour, in which good specimens of each
present a striking and pleasing contrast. In the Blenheim the depth and
richness of the red, the purity of the white, and the distribution and
distinctness of the markings are important. A broad blaze up the fore-
head and over the skull, with the red spot or lozenge in the centre, the
cheeks and ears being red, although generally of a paler shade than on the
body markings; the neck and front of chest, where the hair is longer, and
called the mane, pure white, which is also the body colour, and the deep red
markings on back, sides, &c., are esteemed by the picturesqueness of their
distribution. The pale colour is now by some exhibitors valued, and
Buch specimens are called mace coloured. The coat should be free from
curl, a fault which some inherit from the King Charles spaniel; it should
be abundant all over the body, and long, soft, and silky on the front of
chest, ears, legs, feet, and tail.

The size ranges from 51b. to 101b.; I think below 71b. or 81b. they are
too puny and wanting in physique to give pleasure as pets, and likely to
require too much nursing ; to this, of course, there are exceptions. The
following are the weights and measurements of two of Mr. J. W. Berrie’s, a
gentleman who has given much attention to the breeding of Blenheims :

Mr. J. W. Berrie’s The Earl: Age, 3 years ; weight, 8£lb. ; height
at Bhoulder, llin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 19in.; length of
tail, 5in. (cut) ; girth of chest, 16in.; girth of loin, ll£in.; girth of
head, llin.; girth of forearm, 4£in.; length of head from occiput to tip
of nose, 3in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 6in.;
ears from tip to tip, 19£in.; from stop to tip of nose, £in.

Mr. J. W. Berne's Little Blossom : Age, 7 years ; weight, 101b.; height
at shoulder, lOin.; length from nose to set on of tail, 18in.; length of tail,
3in. (cut) ; girth of chest, 17in.; girth of loin, 12in.; girth of head,
lOfin ; girth of forearm, 4in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
3fn.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 5 Jin.; ears
from tip to tip, 17£in.; from stop to tip of nose, |in.

﻿402

British Dogs.

Chapter III.—THE KING CHARLES SPANIEL.

By Corsincon.

The “Merry Monarch” did many more foolish things than take under
his royal care and favour, thereby raising to the position of a court
idol, the beautiful toy spaniel that still bears his name. Harsh censors
may say this trifle is a fit emblem of a frivolous time, and sneer at
court voluptuaries toying with pets which in greater times had been by
their sterner and manlier forefathers contemptuously treated as “ fisting
curres,” and only looked upon as “meet playfellows for mincing mis-
tresses.1’

Be that as it may, the royal favour of Charles has secured for this dog
a popularity which has ebbed and flowed ever since, and is never likely to
disappear. No matter what pet dog may be in the ascendant, for the
time being the royal spaniel has always his votaries, and on the whole
succeeds pretty well in keeping the pride of place due to his exalted
association.

Being a court favourite, he of course got painted, and no less an artist
than Vandyke has immortalised him on canvass, but there he is repre-
sented as a liver and white dog, although doubtless they varied in colour.
There is but little difference between dark liver and black, and both
these, as also red are specially spaniel colours. It is easy to conceive
the ones selected by the painter to be individual favourites, and not
chosen as representatives of the breed in that one particular.

Landseer and Frith have both chosen the black, white, and red in
painting these dogs, doubtless as the more effective from an artistio
point of view, and the tri-coloured variety was the most popular half a
century ago and to a later time. A writer in 1802 referring to the breed of
King Charles, says ‘ ‘ they were supposed to be the small black curly sofrt
which bear his name, but they were more likely to have been of the
distinct breed of cockers, if judgment may be consistently formed from
the pictures of Vandyke, in which they are introduced.’ ’ From this
writer, it would appear that, eighty years ago, the black, by which pro-
bably he meant black and tan, were considered the correct thing.

From all of these facts and statements, with many others of a similar﻿﻿﻿The King Charles Spaniel.

403

kind, it appears to me that the breed has been modified to suit the fashion
of the day.

At present the jet glossy black, with rich warm tan markings, are in
favour, and no other colours have a chance with these in the judging
ring.

The breeders of these toys, in London and elsewhere, have certainly
brought them in form and colour to a high state of perfection; and, judged
by the standard set up—whether the lines be approved or not—both
these and the modern Blenheims are marvels of the breeder’s skill.

In respect to colour, and the close connection between the black and
tan, and red, or liver, it is worthy of notice that Mr. Garwood, one of the
oldest London breeders, took first prize at the Alexandra Palace show,
1878, in a class for King Charles spaniels of any other colour than black
and tan, with a red dog, Dandy, the Bame dog having been second to
Miss Dawson’s Frisky- in an open King Charles spaniel class, 1875, and
Garwood has assured me the dog was black and tan bred on both sides
for Borne generations.

This is at once accounted for when we remember that the black and
tan King Charles and the red and white Blenheims have been repeatedly
crossed by the trading breeders of fancy dogs, so that even now a well
bred bitch of either sort, mated with one like herself, may throw a pup
of the other variety.

Such occurrences are, however, becoming rare, for the two are bred
distinct, except where the cross is purposely resorted to to produce
specimens of the charming tricoloured pets once so much in vogue.

Although the black, white, and tan variety is at present rather out of
fashion, it is not without its admirers, and I believe they are on the
increase, so that I quite look to them taking a prominent place at showB
at no distant date. Two of the most beautiful specimens of these I know
are Mrs. Bussell Earp’s Tweedledee, a winner at the Alexandra Palace,
of whioh we give an engraving, and Conrad, brother to Tweedledee, and
the property of Miss Violet Cameron.

When the oolours are rich and nioely distributed, this variety is much
more attractive and gay than the black and tan King Charles, or even
the red and white Blenheim ; and if encouragement were given at shows
to these beautiful toys, they would soon appear in numbers, and regain
the popularity they have temporarily lost.﻿British Dogs.

4°4

They are a variety of pet dog that are at least worth preserving, and
for this purpose, whilst good specimens are so scarce, I would recom-
mend good rich coloured King Charles bitches to be crossed with Blen-
heim dogs, as most likely to produce desirable specimens.

The King Charles, too, is generally rather the largest, which is a distinct
advantage.

The produce might be depended on to be stronger and more easily
reared than the in-and-in bred of either of the parent variety.

The following are the points of the modern King Charles spaniel,
together with those of the Blenheim, drawn up by “ Stonehange,’ ’ which
I do not think can be improved upon.

If fashion changes, or if, without neglecting the present style, a minia-
ture spaniel on the lines of our best field spaniels, should be introduced, a
set of descriptive points forming a standard to breed up to can be easily
arranged and agreed to by those interested ; in the meantime, it is much
more to be desired that the standards already drawn up for existing
breeds should be made practical use of than merely reproduced by
different writers with variations.

The present standard would well apply to the black, white, and tan
variety.

Points of toy spaniels :

The head should be well domed, and in good specimens is absolutely
semi-globular, sometimes even extending beyond the half circle, and
absolutely projecting over the eyes, so as nearly to meet the upturned
nose.

The “ stop,” or hollow between the eyes, is as well marked as in the
bulldog, or even more so; some good specimens exhibiting a hollow deep
enough to bury a small marble.

The nose mnst be short, and well turned up between the eyes, without
any indication of artificial displacement afEorded by a deviation to either
side. The colour of the end should be black, and it should be both deep
and wide, with open nostrils.

The lower jaw must be wide between its branches, leaving plenty of
space for the tongue and for the attachment of the lower lips, which
should completely conceal the teeth. It should also be turned up or
“finished,” so as to allow of its meeting the end of the upper jaw,
turned up in a similar way as above described.﻿The King Charles Spaniel.

405

The ears mast be long, so as to approach the ground. In an average
sized dog they measure 20in. from tip to tip, and some reach 22in., or
even a trifle more. They should be set low on the head, and be heavily
feathered. In this respect the King Charles is expected to exceed
the Blenheim, and his ears occasionally extended to 24in.

The eyes are set wide apart, with the eyelids square to the line of face,
not oblique or fox-like. The eyes themselves are large, lustrous and
very dark in colour, so as to be generally considered black; their enormous
pupils, which are absolutely of that colour, increasing the description.
From their large size, there is almost always a certain amount of weeping
shown at the inner angles.

In compactness of shape these spaniels almost rival the pug, but the
length of coat adds greatly to the apparent bulk, as the body, when the
coat is wetted, looks small in comparison with that dog. Still, it ought
to be decidedly “cobby,” with strong stout legs, broad back, and wide
chest.

The symmetry of the toy spaniel is of some importance, but it is
seldom that there is any defeot in this respect.

The colour varies with the breed. In the King Charles a rich black and
tan is demanded without white, the black tan and white variety being dis-
regarded, though, in the best bred litters, occasionally a puppy of this
colour appears. Tan spots over the eyes and on the cheeks, as well as
the usual marking on the legs, are also required. The Blenheim, on the
other hand, must on no account be whole-coloured, but should have a
ground of pure pearly white, with bright rich ohesnut red markings,
evenly distributed in large patches. The ears and cheeks should be red,
and there Bhould be a blaze of white extending from the nose up to the
forehead, and ending between the ears in a crescentic curve. In the
centre of this blaze there should be a clear “ spot ” of red, of the size of
a sixpence.

The coat in both varieties should be long, silky, soft, and wavy, but
not curly. In the Blenheim there should be a profuse mane, extending
well down in front of the ohest.

The feather should be well displayed on the ears and feet, where it is
so long as to give the appearance of their being webbed. It is also
carried well up the backs of the legs. In the King Charles the feather
on the ears is very long and prefuse, exceeding that of the Blenheim by﻿British Dogs.

406

an inch or more. The feather on the tail, which ia cut to a length of
about three and a half or four inches, should be silky, and from five to
sir inches in length, constituting a marked “ flag ” of a square shape.

In size, both breeds vary from 51b. to 101b. in weight; the smaller the
better, if otherwise well proportioned.

	
Chapter IV.—THE PUG.

By Coesincon.

I am relieved from the necessity of following in the footsteps of every
writer on pugs since the issue of “ Stonehenge’s ” work in 1859. One
and all of them have informed their readers that twenty, twenty-five,
or thirty years ago—according to the date of their writing—the pug dog
was exceedingly scarce, and indeed all but lost. There is no need to
lament any Buch scarcity now. As soon as the tide of fashion turned
and again set in for pugs the creation of the supply commenced, and
now, like so many others, the pug market is over-stocked, and every-
where in town and country these animals swarm.

“Idstone,” writing in 1872, hazards the opinion, or rather expresses
a doubt, whether we could produce half a dozen specimens equal to
what existed a century ago. I should say “Idstone” undervalued
the pugs of the day when he penned the remarks quoted, and ever
since there have been dozens of first class pug dogs shown, and there
are and always have been a very much greater number in private
hands which are never exhibited. There are, however, still too few
good ones, an immense quantity of mediocre ones, and a super-
abundance of weeds. The fact is dog shows have given a tremendous
impetus to breeding. Very few who take up dog breeding as a sort
of “ hobby that can be made to pay ” seem to have any idea that
there are certain laws of breeding which must be followed if success
is to be attained, and that, together with the exercise of a grasping
spirit which will turn every pup, however worthless, into coin of the﻿JACQUET’S PUG DOG “TUM TU^﻿﻿The Pug.

407

realm—fills the country with rubbish. It is quite certain there are far
more puppies of this and other breeds bom than ought to be allowed
to live. Many are so weak in vitality that they are sure, if they live
at all to grow up diseased and weedy, and a majority are so wanting
in the essential qualities of the breed that no one with a real desire
to improve our dogs would think of rearing them. But such dogs are
reared and bred from, on acoount of a supposed value attaching to their
pedigrees, and bo faults are propagated and confirmed.

Much has been written on the origin of the pug, but I have been
able to discover nothing authentic—all seems to be merely conjecture.
One writer says we first obtained the pug from Muscovy, and that he
is an undoubted native of that country. Another that he is native
to Holland; whilst others assert the pug to be a cross between our
English bulldog and the small Dane.

I merely state these theories without adopting an; of them, and I
have not one of my own to offer. Of whatever country he is a native
he is, I think, dearly an import to this, and although his breeding
was for a time so neglected that he was nearly lost to us, we can
still boast of having the best in the world.

The pug is widely distributed; a dog nearly akin to him is met with
in China and Japan, he iB well known in Russia, a favourite in
Germany, plentiful in Holland and Belgium, and common enough in
France.

From the date of his resuscitation in this country his history is
much clearer, and, by the aid of the stud books and other means,
will be kept so. In the last edition of “ Dogs of the British Islands,”
“ Stonehenge ” states, and no doubt on the best authority, that in the
decade 1840-50, among other breeders who attempted to bring the breed
up to its former distinguished position in this country, foremost and
most successful was the then Lady Willoughby d’Eresby, who succeeded
by crossing a dog obtained in Vienna with a bitch of a strong fawn
oolour imported from Holland, and afterwards, by careful selection in
breeding from their stock, in establishing the now celebrated Willoughby
strain. The Bame excellent authority states the pale coloured Morrison
strain to be lineally descended from a stock in the possession of Queen
Charlotte, and through them no doubt to inherit the blood of the
favourites of Dutch William ; the late Mr. Morrison having, it is﻿408

British Dogs.

assumed, obtained the breed through the servants, and his careful
breeding has established a strain that bears his name, and by this
we see that both the Willoughby and Morrison strains are strong
in Dutch blood, the Morrison being, in fact, the most purely Dutch.

No doubt there were many other sources to which the present race
of pugs is due, and it is now usual to call every fawn or stone ooloured
pug a Willoughby, and the paler yellowish ones Morrison’s ; but the
two strains have been frequently united, and in a class of twenty
almost every shade of colour between the two that mark these strains
is met with.

The popularity which the pug has again enjoyed for the last quarter
of a century is an instance of the caprice of fashion. A writer on the
breed says of him, “ perhaps in the whole catalogue of the canine
species there is not one of less utility or possessing less the power of
attraction than the pug dog; applicable to no sport, appropriated to
no useful purpose, and susceptible of no predominent passion and in
no way remarkable for any extra eminence, he is continued from era
to era for what alone he might have been originally intended, the
patient follower of a ruminating philosopher, or the adulating and
consolatory companion of an old maid.” With these views and senti-
ments I have no sympathy, as my friends who are pug lovers, whether
“ruminating philosophers,” maids or matrons, may rest assured. I
am not so utilitarian as the writer, who I presume to have been a
cantankerous old bachelor, caring for nothing but his pipe, his
pointer, and his gun.

The pug, when made a companion of, shows a high intelligence ; as
house dogs they are ever on the alert, and promptly give notice of a
stranger’s approach, and from their extremely active, I may say merry,
habits, they are most interesting pets, and well repay by their
gratitude any affection and kindness bestowed on them. One quality
they possess above most breeds, which is a strong recommendation
of them as lap dogs, and that is their cleanliness and freedom from
any offensive smell of breath or skin.

Many ladies, by lavishing mistaken kindness on their pugs, do them
serious harm. Over feeding, feeding too often, and on too rich diet,
together with insufficient exercise, cause obesity, with a hoBt of evils
in its train, asthma among others, which make the dog’s life a﻿The Pug

409

burden to itself and a cause of discomfort to the owner. Nothing
does so well for house dogs as plain bisouits, dry bread, or well
boiled oatmeal porridge, varied with a few scraps of meat from the
stock pot, a little gravy, and boiled green vegetables, such as cabbage,
turnips, and carrots, and occasionally large rough boneB to gnaw and
play with, and smaller ones to crunch and eat.

Before proceeding to give a detailed description and value of each
point, I think it will be very useful to reproduce here in a condensed
form a correspondence from the columns of the “ Country,” which created
very considerable interest at the time, everyone of the writers being pug
breeders, and most of them successful exhibitors. The writer, to open
the ball, was Mr. Theodore Marples, and I think I cannot do better than
let eaoh writer speak for her and himself, omitting matter in the letters
which had merely a passing or personal interest:—

“As an admirer of this breed of dog, whioh is nowadays one of, if
not the, most fashionable canine appendage to the drawing room, 1
venture to make a few observations as to their points. I have pro-
cured many opinions on the pug, including ‘ Stonehenge,’ ‘ Idstone,’
Mayhew, &o., who differ little as to the essential points requisite in
a ‘ perfect specimen.’ I have attended many of our shows in various
parts of the country, but have failed to discover the type of dog
required, there being such a discrepancy in the decisions at shows.
One judge seems to favour one dog and another judge prefers another,
and in many instances, I will not say all, they seem to ignore alto-
gether the points as laid down by the authors before named. At one
show you will see a big dog, with a tumed-up tail, not the ' curl, ’
win; at another, one with a long muzzle and leggy, or a blaok face
and the coat all ‘ smutty,’ instead of a distinct trace. Now, I
think, and have no doubt most of the fancy will bear me out, that
what I may term the modem pug should, in the first place, be * small ’
—being a toy, the smaller the better. I adopt myself the standard
weight of 121b., and if a little less all the better; but I contend if
they are muoh over that it is a fault, and should be looked upon
as such. They should also be low on leg, with Bhort round body,
well ribbed up ; shortness of muzzle also is a very important point,
but how few you see really good in this respect. It is easy to
breed them the other way, the head to be rather large and lofty, or

E E﻿4io

British Dogs.

high forehead if you will, with a full dark eye and set rather wide
apart, earB small and to drop nicely at the side of the head, tail
well-curled on the back, or what is termed ‘ double curled.’ The
old style was dogs to the right and bitches to the left, though I
like to see them myself in the centre; but the important thing is
that they be well-curled, and not merely turned up on the back like
many street dogs. With regard to colour, the muzzle, eyebrows, ears,
and centre of head only should be black, with the requisite moles
on cheek and distinct line or trace down centre of back extending
to root of tail. Most old writers maintain that the trace should
extend to the tip of the tail, but this is seldom seen now. They
also should have what is called hare feet—that is, toes well split up—
and black toenails. Inasmuch as there is a fixed number of points
given by several of our best known breeders and writers on the pug
whom no one disputes, I think if judges at our shows would adopt
the point system to a greater extent it would assist breeders in
knowing what to breed to, and so to cross the many types of pugs
we have, and eventually get at the desired result.”

To the above the following responses were made :

“I read with considerable pleasure Mr. T. Marples’s letter about
‘ pugs ’ in your impression of last week, for, like him, I am an admirer
and a breeder of these canine aristocrats; but I take exception to
some of the points as he describes them.

“ First as to size. Such loose expressions as ‘ the smaller the
better ’ are objectionable in descriptions of our pets. Mr. Marples
is quite justified in making 121b. the maximum standard for his own
breeding, but he cannot tie others to it ; a very small dog might
be preferable if intended to be constantly nursed in a lady’s lap,
but others prefer a dog that can take exercise on its own legs and
disport itself in park or field without being knocked up ; and I do
not think a 161b. pug too big for a companion and pet, and size I
consider as nothing in comparison with shape, points, and markings.

“ I know Mr. Marples has ‘ Stonehenge ’ on his side in this, that
eminent writer stating that a pug should weigh from 61b. to 101b. ;
but on this and one or two other points I think ‘ Stonehenge ’ con-
tradicts himself, which I will endeavour to show presently; but first
let me say I also take exception to the term ‘ low in the leg ’ or to﻿The Pug.

411

their ‘ being short-legged,’ unless it is qualified or used relatively, and
its exaot meaning more clearly defined. I know a great many writers
have used these terms in describing the pug, but I hold that this
shortness of leg is more apparent than real, and that it is the wide
and deep chest and round barrel that make the fore legs especially
look shorter than they are. Meyriok, who, on the whole, gives an
excellent description of the pug, also says that he should stand low
on the leg; but all of these writers use similar terms in speaking of
the Skye terrier, Dandie Dinmont terrier, and the dachshund, and,
therefore, I do not think they should be used in describing the pug.

“‘Stonehenge’ says, ‘the general appearance is low and thickset,’
and ‘ the body as close to the ground as possible,’ which latter expres-
sion is, I think, absurd, as no suoh dog could have what he also
insists on, ‘ an elegant outline.’ The same writer adds, ‘ chest wide,
deep, and round.’ Now, I would ask, how can you have a dog agreeing
to that description stand ‘ Stonehenge’s ’ maximum height of 15in.,
and not exoeed his maximum weight of ten pounds ? Meyrick, too,
I consider, contradicts his own expression, ‘low on the leg,’ by giving
as a maximum height 14in. Now, taking ‘ Stonehenge’s ’ figures of
height and weight, suppose a 14in. dog to weigh 91b., he would
stand from 3£in. to 4in. higher at the shoulder than a 161b. Dandie
Dinmont. I have just roughly measured the engravings in ‘ Stonehenge’s ’
‘Dogs of the British Islands’ and ‘The Sportsman’s Cabinet,’ and
should say the length from outside of hips to front of chest is not
more than one-fifteeDth over the height at shoulder, and such pro*
portion will not apply to what is generally understood by a short-legged
dog. I would desoribe a pug as a squarely built, thickset dog, standing
on straight legs of moderate length, the height at shoulder and length
of body being nearly equal. If we are to have short legged dogs we
shall have a race of "King Koffees—that much overrated animal, whose
conformation of body and legs approaches the dachshund.

“I think it would be interesting if owners of acknowledged good
pups, such as Mrs. Bligh Monok’s Tom and Sambo, Mr. Chapman’s
Leo, Mr. Hioken’s Max, Mr. Key’B Jumbo, Mr. Nunn’s Barron, Miss
G. E. M. Croker’s Punch, and others, would give the height at
shoulder, length of body, and weight of their dogs. Perhaps Mrs.
Foster would also give your readers weight and measurement of King

E E 2﻿412

British Dogs.

Koffee, and Mr. Faire of Mrs. Crusoe, both of which, I fancy, will be
found to difEer considerably in measurement to the others. The
measurement should be taken with the dog standing square on a
table, with an upright stick and cross-piece at the shoulder, and for
length a foot rule along the side, with a crosspiece at back of the
hips, and one across front of chest.

“ There is another point on which I difEer from Mr. Marples, if I
understand him aright, and that is, ‘ ears to drop nicely at the side
of the head.’ This is rather vague. I go with him if he means they
must not be tulip ears, or carried back on the neck like a whippet’s ;
but, if he means that they are to drop like a fox terrier’s, fall like
those of a Dandie or a Bedlington, or be as Nunn’s Barron’s are—the
button ears of a bulldog—I there join issue with him.”

Another gentleman, writing under the nom de plume of “Eileen,”
says:

“I agree with Theo. Marples in nearly all particulars, especially
about the feet, yet how few judges think about them; and as for
black toenails, that is usually considered a mere nothing.

“ The modern pug, in my opinion, ought to be like the pugs of
long ago, except for the cropped ears. There is no doubt that the
breed of days gone by was dark cream, or clear light fawn colour,
as described by ‘ Stonehenge,’ decidedly not the smutty animals that
are to be seen so frequently at present. I should like to know if
Theo. Marples has ever seen a pug perfectly clear in colour and with
a black trace down the back. I find that when the trace is black
the coat is invariably smutty, and particularly about the chest. I
object to any smuttiness, and especially on the chest. The mask ought
to end abruptly under the chin, and there should not be the slightest
trace of black below that; but I usually see a smutty chest when
there is a black trace. There certainly should be a decided line
darker than the coat, and when the pug is angry the line or trace
should stand up in a ridge.

“ With regard to the point system for pug judging, it would be very
desirable. ‘ Stonehenge ’ gives fifteen for pure colour, ten for trace ; yet
how many judges take the trace as the sine qud non, and pass over all
other deficiencies for sake of a black line. The head ought to be the first
consideration ; then the colour, shape, feet, and tail. With regard to the﻿The Pug.

413

latter, I like the old style, right and left, and decidedly object to a centre
cnrl; it should lie close on the hip, either side. The highest number of
points is fifteen for pure colour, and therefore it is quite clear that colour
is the first thing to be thought of. I do not object to a pug weighing from
121b. to 151b.; I do not like them much less than 121b. When they are
smaller they have a very shrill, disagreeable bark; but, of course, that
has nothing to do with points ; but in a drawing-room pet a shrill bark is
objectionable. I find that the fawn pugs have a round, full bark—con-
tralto in tone, if I may use such a term—while the bark of the small
dark mouse-colour pugs is shrill and piercing.

“ I also agree with Theo. Marples that the ears should drop close to
the head, and that the muzzle should be very short, the eyes dark and
prominent, and I like the black smudge on fore-head ; I also like a good
wide chest. I have seen so many different kinds of pugs awarded prizes
that I am sometimes quite puzzled. Nearly every judge has a fancy of his
own, and until there is some uniformity of opinion on the pug subject
there is little chance of any improvement in the breed.

“If the point system was adopted, there would be a line to guide
exhibitors, at all events ; and I think that good would result from it.”

Another fancier, signing himself “ Xerxes,” says :

“ I am glad to see the increasing popularity of this breed....
‘ Eileen ’ says a dog with a smudged head is not the correct thing ! I
differ from ‘ Eileen,’ inasmuch as I acknowledge two different types of
pugs, the light shaded and the dark shaded.

“The only markings of the former are black mask, ears, moles, and
toe-nails, and a dark shade running down the back.

“ The markings of the latter are black mask, ears, thumb mark on head,
toenails, and a dark shade down the front, and trace down the back,
behind, and under the forearms and between the hind legs, and the head
of these is always better wrinkled.

“ The pug should be a very stout, squarely built, cobby, and hardy
animal, standing on straight legs, very broad across the chest and stern;
back level, neck stiff and head held well up ; colour silver or golden
fawn; a smudged body and white are faults ; the trace should be very
distinct and narrow, Jin. to fin. wide ; head large, round, and wrinkled,
eyes bold and prominent. . . . muzzle bold, square, and short, say,
for a 121b. dog fin., not more; the mask should be jet black just﻿414

British Dogs.

enveloping the eyes; the toes well split np, and the nails blaok; the
tail Bhonld curl as near the centre as possible, and not on either side ;
the hair should be plentiful, soft, and piley at the roots, and feel very
soft to the touch j the weight of a good pug should not exceed 131b.;
nor be less than 91b.”

In a second letter, Mr. Theo. Marples says, of the protruding of the
tongue : ‘ ‘ I do not consider this an essential point, but where it oocurs
I think it an acquisition and “Eileen,” in a subsequent letter, says,
“Victor [Mrs. TufnelTs] is my beau iddal of a pug; he is clear light
fawn in colour, with dark shade down back; tail curled to the right;
good broad chest; black mask, ending under the chin ; moles ; ears falling
close to the head, and in the very centre of the head a distinct black
smudge or thumb mark.”

Mr. J. Brookes says : “I have been a breeder of pugs Borne time, and
have taken first prizes. The points often overlooked by judges are the
moles on cheek and carriage of tail, which should be—bitch at near side,
dog at off side.”

Mr J. Nunn, an old London breeder, says : “ There are two varieties,
the gold fawns and silver fawns. ... I find the lighter the body colour
the blacker the mask, ears, trace, moles, &c. With the golden fawn, the
ears and trace are seldom more than a dark brown, nothing approaching
a black, and when they have good masks I find their noses very often
wanting in colour.”

Mr. S. B. Witchell, breeder of King Koffee, Mrs. Crusoe, and other
winners, said he objected to a protruding tongue. Mr. Marples expressed
himself in favour of drop or button ears. Mr. Vero Shaw considered
the rose ear the prettiest; and a considerable number of other breeders
gave their views in accordance with one or other of the preceding. It will
be seen that there is a very general consensus of opinion on main points,
although different views are held on minor ones, and, as these differences
principally express mere individual taste and fancy, they are likely to
continue.

I give the following as my own opinions on the points of the pug:

General appearance and symmetry of the pug is decidedly square and
oobby ; a lean leggy dog and a long-backed short-legged one are equally
out of harmony with the ideal pug, which, although not so graceful in
oontour as the greyhound and some of the terriers are, should yet be so﻿The Pug.

415

well proportioned that each part is, as to size, in harmony and conformity
with every other, and in combination, forming a symmetrical whole.
Condition, which materially affeots a dog’s chance in the judging ring,
alters the general appearance and destroys the symmetry when it
represents extreme poverty or excessive obesity. The pug is a multwm
m pa/rvo, but this condensation, if I may use the word, should be shown
by compactness of form, in well knit proportions, and hardness of
developed muscle.

The head should be round and short, the skull well domed and large,
to correspond with the general size—bigness is the better word—of this
delightful little ladies’ pet. The muzzle must be short and square (a
pointed muzzle is a serious drawbaok); the nose is short, but the pug is
not “up-faced,” like the bulldog. His nose should be deoidedly of the
snub variety, but not retroussd. The protrusion of the tongue is a de-
formity often arising from partial paralysis of that useful organ, and apt to
appear in all short-faced dogs, but it should always be looked on as a fault.

The ears should be small, thin, soft, and velvety, and black in colour.
Some are oarried flat and close to the face, corresponding to the “ button
ear ’ ’ of the bulldog; others have the ears partially thrown back, the edge
again slightly folding forward, and a portion of the interior shown. This
also corresponds with a variety of ear of the bulldog, called the “ rose
ear.” I prefer the “rose” to the “button” ear in both breeds, the
latter, giving a dull, heavy, almost sulky look to the countenance.

The eyes are dark in colour, very large, bold, and prominent, globular
in shape, soft and solicitous in expression, and very lustrous, and, when
exoited, full of fire. There Bhould be no tendency to water, or weep, as
it is oalled.

It has been insisted that there should be a black mole on eaoh
oheek, with three hairs growing out of it. “Stonehenge” gives 5 in
his valuation of points for this. “ Idstone ” lays it down as important,
and hundreds re-echo them. I am of opinion that these two eminent
writers have themselves merely eohoed the extremely foolish cant of dog
fanoiers. A mole on eaoh cheek is not peculiar to pugs, but will, on
examination, be found in every breed, c nd is easily enough seen on all
smooth-faced dogs, anti I cannot, therefore, see why these marks should
be claimed aB a special point in the pug. I would not allow a single point
for them.﻿416

British Dogs.

The mask is the black colour of the face. The more intense it is the
better, and it should include the eyes, running in a straight line across
the forehead; the more sharply defined this mask is the better, as the
contrast between it and the body colour is thereby more strongly
marked. Separate from the mask is a black patch or thumb mark but
rarely met with, but much to be desired, and no pug can be considered
absolutely perfect without it. The loose skin of the head forms into
wrinkles, which alter in depth with the varying emotions of the dog;
when seen at their greatest they give a frowning look to it. The lines of
these wrinkles can be traced when the skin is stretched, or smooth, by
deeper shades of colour.

The trace is a dark line—the blacker the better—running along the
back right to the end of the tail. It should be clearly defined and
narrow, half an inch to an inch at broadest.

The colour of the pure Morrison is a yellow fawn, the pure Willoughby
a cool stone or light drab ; but the two strains are now much interbred,
and good pugs of many various shades are met with. What is called the
“ apricot fawn ’ ’ is now in vogue with many, but the great consideration
is to get the colonr—whatever its shade—decided enough, and with a
very pronounced contrast between it and the black of the mask, trace,
and vent. The most common fault in colour is smuttiness, the mask
spreading over the whole head, the trace extending down each side, and
the fawn hairs of the body being more or less shaded with black. A
correspondent informs me that Mr. Beswicke Boyd’s family, who for
many generations owned a very fine breed of pugs, now lost, had one pair
—the last—that invariably threw one pure white pup in each litter. The
eminent veterinarian, Blain, records a similar instance in a pug bitch of
his own, which in three consecutive litters had one pure white pup. A
white pug with good points would be a curiosity, and the production of a
strain of them does not seem impossible, and is well worth the attention
of speculative breeders.

A great fault with many pugs shown now is coarseness of coat. It
should be fine, smooth, soft, and glossy. The skin is extremely
loose, and when a handful is taken, the coat, although thus handled,
must on one side be felt against the grain, should be neither hard nor
woolly.

The neck is short, thick, and fleshy, and with the skin loose and﻿The Pug.

417

free ; although there is seldom a decided dewlap, still there must be au
abundance, or the head will be tight-skinned and void of wrinkles.

The pug is wide across the chest, wide through the barrel, and square
in the quarters ; the back is fairly broad, and the whole body stout and
thick set.

The legs must be straight and well under him, of moderate length.
The dog should stand about twelve inches high, and at that height
should weigh about 151b. The legs should be strong, and the feet
rather long or hare-shaped, the toes well split up, and the toenails
black.

The tail is of great importance. The more tightly and closely it is
ourled over the hip, the more is thought of it; and in a winner nowadays
the double curl is almost indispensable. Many fanciers insist that the
dog should curl the tail over the right hip, and the bitch curl her tail
over the left hip, and this is very often the case ; but I have seen these
positions reversed, and many good specimens curl the tail straight between
the hips.

The following are actual weights and measurements of good representa-
tive dogs :

Mr. S. B. Witchell’s Topsey (dam of King Koffee and Mrs. Crusoe) :
Weight, 14Jlb. ; length from chest to Btern, 13fin. ; height at shoulder,
12in.; height from elbow down, or length of leg, 6in.; width of chest
between forelegs, 5 Jin. j girth of chest, 21in.; ditto of loins, 16in.; width
of skull between ears, 4in.; length of nose, fin.; width around snout,
7in.; ditto around Bkull, 12in.

Mr. T. Morris’s Punch: Weight, 17Jlb. ; height at shoulder, 12in.;
chest to stern, 16in.; length of leg, 6Jin.; girth of chest, 19Jin. ; muzzle,
fin.; girth of muzzle, 7in.

Mr. Vero Shaw’s MilVy: Length of body, 12 Jin.; height at shoulder,
11 Jin.; width round chest, 18Jin.; ditto round skull, 12Jin. ; ditto round
Bnout, 6in.; length of tail, 6 Jin.; ditto nose, 1 Jin. ; width of skull, 3fin.;
length of leg, 6Jin. ; weight, 151b. 9Joz.

Mr. S. B. Witchell’s Young Friday : Weight, 14flb.; length of leg,
6in.; height at shoulder, 12in.; length from ohest to stern, 12Jin.; girth
of chest, 20in.; ditto of loins, 16in.; around skull, 14Jin.; length of nose,
1 Jin. ; around Bnout, 8in. ; width between ears, 4Jin.

Mr. Hobson Key’B Jumbo : Length of body, 12 Jin.; height at shoulder,﻿418

British Dogs.

12in. ; from ground to elbow, 6Jin.; girth of skull, 12£in.; girth of chest,
19in.; weight, 15£lb.

Mr. W. Louis Faire’s Mrs. Crusoe : Height at shoulder, 10£in.; length
from chest to stern, 12£in.; girth of chest, 15in.; skull, ll£in.; weight,
101b.

Mrs. P. It. Pigott’s Judy (K.C.S.B., 5686) : Age,	years ; weight,

16alb.; height at shoulder, ll|in.; length from nose to set on of tail,
23£in. ; length of tail, 7in.; girth of chest, 19£in; girth of loin, 16in.;
girth of head, 13in. ; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 5in.; girth of leg
lin. below elbow, 3£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose,
4£in. ; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 6£in.;
colour and markings, light fawn, black ears, muzzle moles, brownish
trace.

Mrs. P. E. Pigott’s PatU II. (Irish Kennel Club Show, 1879) : Age,
14 months ; weight, 131b.; height at shoulder, lOin.; length from nose to
set on of tail, 23in.; length of tail, 7in. ; girth of chest, 17£in. ; girth
of loin, 14£in.; girth of head, llin. ; girth of arm lin. above elbow,
5in.; girth of leg lin. below elbow, 3£in.; length of head from occiput to
tip of nose, 5in.; girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose,
6in.; colour and markings, dark yellow fawn, distinct black trace, black
ears, and smudge on forehead.

Miss Alicia A. L. Jaquet’s Tum-Tum : Age, 2 years 4 months ; weight,
191b. ; height at shoulder, 13£in.; length from nose to set on of tail,
22in. ; length of tail, 6£in.; girth of chest, 20in. ; girth of loin, 17Jin.;
girth of head, 14£in. ; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 5fin.; girth of leg
lin. below elbow, 5in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 5in. ;
girth of muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7£in.; from comer
of eye to tip of nose, lin. ; between eyes, lfin. ; depth of chap, 1 Jin. ;
colour and markings, stone fawn, black points.

Mrs. Foster’s Banjo : Age, 2 years ; weight, 121b.; height at shoulder,
10£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 19£in.; length of tail, 5|in.;
girth of chest, 17in. ; girth of loin, 14in. ; girth of head, 12£in. ; girth
of arm lin. above elbow, 5£in.; girth of leg lin. below elbow, 4Jin. ;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 4£in.; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 6fin.; colour and markings, cold stone
fawn, with black ears and good trace ; fair good eyes set wide apart, and
black toe nails.﻿The Pug.

419

Mrs. Poster’s Sambo : Age, 4^ years; weight, 17|lb. ; height at shoulder,
12£in. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 24in.; length of tail, 6in.;
girth of chest, 20in.; girth of loin, 17in. ; girth of head, 13^in.; girth
of arm lin. above elbow, 6^in. ; girth of leg lin. below elbow, 5jin.;
length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 5jin. ; girth of muzzle midway
between eyes and tip of nose, 8in.; colour and markings, cold stone fawn,
with black ears and black toe nails, with large full eyes set wide apart.

Mrs. Jolliffe Tufnell’s Victor: Age, 7 years; weight, 201b. ; height at
shoulder, 12fin. ; length from nose to set on of tail, 22£in.; length of
tail, 8in.; girth of chest, 21in.; girth of loin, 19£in.; girth of head,
14in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 5£in.; girth of leg lin. below elbow,
4fin. ; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 6£in.; girth of muzzle
midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in.; colour and markings, apricot
colour, mask entirely black, terminating at the level of eye.

Mr. E. Weekley’s Vic : Age, 3 years 11 months ; weight, 201b.; height
at shoulder, 12in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 21in.; length of
tail, 8in.; girth of chest, 22£in.; girth of loin, 16iin.; girth of head,
12fin. ; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 5in. ; girth of leg lin below elbow,
4£in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 5in.; girth of muzzle
midway between eyes and tip of nose, 6in. ; colour and markings,
apricot fawn.

Mr. E. Field’s Swizzle: Age, 2 years 11 months; weight, 151b.;
height at shoulder, ll^in.;	length from	nose to	set on of tail, 20in.;

length of tail, 6£in. ; girth	of chest, 19in.; girth	of loin, 16in.; girth of

head, 13in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 6in. ; girth of leg lin. below
elbow, 5in.; length of head from occiput to tip of nose, 5in.; girth of
muzzle midway between eyes and tip of nose, 7in.; colour and markings,
light fawn, distinct mark down the back.

Mr. E. Field’s Snub : Age, 4 years 3 months ; weight, 16£lb.; heigth
at shoulder, 12|in. ; length	from nose to	set on of	tail, 23in.;	length of

tail, 6in.; girth of chest,	20in.; girth	of loin,	16in.; girth	of head,

13in.; girth of arm lin. above elbow, 6in.; girth of leg lin. below elbow,
4£in.; length of head from oooiput to tip of nose, 4£in. ; girth of muzzle
midway between eyes and tip of nose, 6$in.; colour and markings, light
fawn, distinct mark down the baok.

——■﻿420

British Dogs.

Chapter V.—THE POMERANIAN.

By Corsincon.

This variety of tlie dog is now an established favourite in this country,
although it has never attained the great popularity of Borne other breeds
of house and companion dogs. He has been written of as the wolf dog,
the fox dog, the spitz, the loup loup, &c.

There is a pretty large tribe of dogs peculiar to northern latitudes,
varying in minor points from each other, but agreeing in general form
and outline, that are often roughly called wolf dogs from an approach to
the wolf form of body and head, and I have little doubt to one or other,
or a commixture of several of these, the Pomeranian of to-day owes his
origin. My reasons for thinking so are that in big and coarse specimens
of what we now call well-bred Pomeranians there is a decided approach
to the lank gaunt form seen in all the varieties of northern dogs shown
as Esquimaux, Greenland, Siberian—sleigh dogs, &c., and there is in all
much correspondence in shape of head, with the invariable prick ears and
pointed muzzle, dense furry under coat, and short curled tail. In their
native home Pomeranians are said to be used as sheep dogs, but such
specimens as are seen in this country are quite unfitted physically for
shepherding on our hills, even if they possessed the requisite patience
and intelligence, which I am not disposed to grant them as a class. The
Pomeranian is a bright, active dog, indeed, almost too active, and many
specimens would be better described as restless and fidgety; they are
also apt to be too noisy, and their yelping becomes annoying; that,
however, is a fault good training can cure or modify. These traits in
his character enhance his value as a house watch, for, ever on the alert,
he is quick to give tongue, and wise enough in his own interest to keep
a safe distance from the intruder whilst he gives the alarm.

Although not ill-tempered dogs, they are rather impatient and not
very tractable, yet I have known several that were very tricky. They
are capital jumpers, and are easily taught steeplechasing, jumping through
hoops, &c., and the handsomest black specimen I ever saw was also the
cleverest performer, walking and dancing on his hind legs, feigning death,
and other clever tricks at the word of command. As ornamental dogs﻿﻿﻿The Pomeranian.

421

they Btand high when kept in good order; the white ones should be
occasionally washed, roughly dried only if the weather is fine, and turned
into a heap of straw or into a good grass field. The coat should be
kept from getting matted by the use of brush and comb, but if the
combing is overdone, they are robbed of the under growth, which gives
density to the coat, which then assumes a limp and frizzy appearance.
They should not be allowed to lie by the fire ; they are sufficiently well
protected from cold by nature, and indulgence by the fire causes the hair
to come off, which is a great nuisance, as well as detracting from their
appearance; and although I cannot explain it, I have known several
instances where the nose of a Pomeranian, perfectly black, has become
brown or flesh coloured from no other apparent cause.

Although one of the numerous breeds we have introduced from abroad
and naturalised, the Pomeranian has been known here for at least a
century, as the following description, I think, clearly proves. He
appears, however, to have been rather bigger than we now like him, and
the then prevailing colour is now discountenanced, if not altogether lost.
A writer in the “ Sportsman’s Cabinet,” 1802, thus describes him : “ The
dog so called in this country is but little more than 18in. or 20in. in
height, and is distinguished by his long, thick, and rather upright coat,
forming a most tremendous ruff about the neck, but Bhort and smooth on
the head and ears. They are mostly of a pale yellow or cream colour,
and lighter on the lower parts. Some are white, some few black, and
others, but very rarely, spotted; the head broad towards the neck, and
narrowing to the muzzle ; ears short, pointed, and erect; nose and eyes
mostly blaok; the tail large and bushy, and invariably curled in a ring
upon the back. Instances of smooth or short coated oneB are very rarely
seen. In England he is much more familiarly known by the name of fox
dog, and this may originally have proceeded from his having much affinity
to that animal about the head; but by those who in their writings
describe him as a native of Pomerania, he passes under the appellation
of the Pomeranian dog.”

I cannot refrain from giving the same writer’s description of the
character of the Pomeranian, although, as applied to those of the present
day, it is decidedly too sweeping in its condemnation. He says the
Pomeranian is ‘‘by nature frivolous, artful, noisy, quarrelsome, oowardly,
petulant, deceitful, snappish and dangerous to children, without one﻿422

British Dogs.

predominant property of perfection to recommend him.” If he deserved
this terribly bad character in the beginning of the centnry, he must have
been a sad dog indeed, and I am glad to he able to say that Master
Pomeranian has largely profited by the happy influences of English home
life, and is now morally a respectable, as he is physically an ornamental,
member of the canine family.

In respect to colour, fashion seems to rule the day, but surely we
ought not to let fashion and prejudice injure a breed when all the while
dog show promoters and others profess to be doing all in their power to
promote canine interests. What could be prettier than a good cream-
coloured Pomeranian or a rich reddish fawn ?

Some fifteen or twenty years ago there was a strain of the latter
colour in the neighbourhood of Handsworth, Birmingham, perfect models
in all points, and two years ago I saw a beauty of the same colour
in an open carriage in London, and I do not think it would be very
difficult to produce them. There was one, two or three years ago, at a
butcher’s shop in Clapham, and a fair one is to be seen any day now in
Drury-lane.

The white ones that now appear at our shows are for the most part
coarse and indifferent specimens, and the black ones a great deal worse.
The best black I have ever seen is the property of the proprietor of
Dolen’s Hotel, Amsterdam.

There are numbers of better Pomeranians in the hands of people who
never exhibit than nineteen out of twenty seen on the show bench. I
know of no class exhibited where there is more room for improvement.

In judging Pomeranians but few points are considered, and these I
would describe and assess as follow :—

General appearance, symmetry, and condition. He presents the appear-
ance of being as square built as a pug, although he is not, his thick
outstanding coat causing the deception, aided by the cut-off look behind,
owing to his tail lying so tightly on his back; yet that he is active
and nimble, his straight forelegs, well bent clean hocks, neat feet, sharp
muzzle, and bright little dark eyes assure the judge; out of condition
he looks thin, meagre, flat-sided, and ragged.

Size. I think a standard for size should be established. As it is, we
have them all sizeB, from 101b. to 251b. As they are essentially a lady’s
dog, I would say the nearest to 161b. for dogs and 141b. bitches the better.﻿The Poodle.

423

Head. Skull flat, broad at occiput, narrowing to the forehead, which
should not be too bold ; cheeks wide, muzzle narrowing to a fine point;
ears small and quite erect; eyes dark, quite black preferable; nose also
black, but a brown nose should not disqualify; the whole head very fox-
like ; head and face covered with smooth short hair.

Coat. Thick, straight, outstanding, free from curl or frizziness, very
abundant all over the body, and superabundant round the neck, forming
a thick deep ruff, and long, straight, and flowing on the hams; under-
neath the longer hair there should be a thick soft underjacket.

Colour. Self colours—white should be a pure flake white throughout,
coloured patches, fawn, or other being very objectionable. Other colours
I think should be encouraged are black, cream, fawn, red, buff.

Legs and feet. Straight fore legs, feathered behind ; hocks well let
down, with but soant feathering below the joint; feet small, neat,
round, and the toes well sprung.

Tail short, tightly curled on the back, exceedingly well feathered,
with the feathering spreading out from eaoh side of it over the hips, fan-
like.

Chapter VI.—THE POODLE.

By Corsincon.

In dogs ordinarily spoken of as poodles we find a multiplicity of type,
whioh is doubtless to be accounted for by the commixture of pure poodle
blood with that of other varieties.

The poodle has been long known in this country. According to the
writer on domesticated dogs in “ Jardine’s Naturalists’ Library,” he is
of German origin. He sayB, “ The water dog or poodle of the Germans
rose first in favour in Germany, and was, during the revolutionary wars,
oarried by the soldiers into France, and that in the later campaigns only
beoame familiar to the British, who met with it in Spain and the Nether-
lands.” The work in whioh this statement is made commands for it
respeot; but I confess that to me it not only laoks luoidity but is unsup-﻿424

British Dogs.

ported by proof, and certainly, bo far as the date at which it became known
to the British is concerned, it appears to be contradicted by the fact that
Hogarth represents the poodle in his time as the clipped, shaven, and
befooled canine fop he is still made by some of his admirers, so that if the
writer referred to is correct, the dog and the whimsical fashion of making
him as grotesque as possible must have at least spread rapidly. I am not
aware that he is referred to by any one of the few English writers on
dogs prior to Hogarth’s time, whereas Gesner, the German writer, to
whose book on animals Dr. Cains contributed the chapters on English
dogs, describes the poodle as a German dog.

Linnaeus recognised two varieties, the large and the small barbet or
water dog, which I take to mean the poodle. Dr. Fitzinger, in his book,
“ Der Hund und seine Raeen,” describes no less than six varieties. This
I give on the authority of “ Wildfowler,” who wrote the article on poodles
in “ Dogs of the British Islands,” and gave there in detail Fitzinger’s
description of each ; but I do not see that it would be of practical value
to transcribe it here. To obtain the six varieties there is a considerable
amount of hair-splitting, and where the class division is not a question of
coat it is merely one of size. We have poodles Bpoken of as French,
Spanish, German, and Russian, but the terms do not convey a very clear
means of identification, or, indeed, express any concise thought of the
speaker in most instances.

The black variety has been very fashionable of late years, and they
have been dubbed Russian poodles, and probably those exhibited may
have been brought from Russia; but black has by all writers been
recognised as a poodle colour, and is, therefore, not peculiar to any
Russian breed of them.

The fact appears to be that they have, whatever their origin and native
home, spread over most of the countries of Europe, and doubtless have
been in different places more or less modified by various crosses.

Our water dog of the early part of this century appears to have been an
impure poodle, and I have no doubt (as I stated in an article on the breed,
published in the “ Country ” a number of years ago) that the Irish water
spaniel has in him a considerable amount of poodle blood. These are the
only two breeds I know of who have the hair on any part of the body
growing in long spiral ringlets, or quills, which is peculiar to the poodle.

Linn arcs says of the poodle, “hair long and curled, like a sheep,”﻿﻿MADAME FELIX’S POODLE “SIR BEVYS.﻿The Poodle.

425

although the curls are thinner and harder than the variety of sheep I
presnme the great naturalist here to take for his illustration. Fitzinger
aoonrately describes the coat as falling down “regularly in rows of
straight cords,’’ and I imagine this is the most marked characteristic of
the breed, and that the fluffy and coarse and open woolly coated are
impure, except, of course, where the open coat has been artificially
obtained by brush and comb. This, I think, is the case with some of
the best samples of those blaok shaven ones now in vogue. I lately saw
at Westgate-on-Sea a splendid specimen, identical in size and shape with
the present winning dogs, but unshaven, black as jet in coat, which
consisted of beautiful oorded ringlets throughout.

The white oorded variety, with shorter legs, has long been cultivated
in onr northern counties, but one of the best specimens in England, shown
by Mr. Walter Potts at Hanover, in 1879, stood no chance against the
German exhibits, which included the finest specimens I have ever seen,
perfect in the long equal quill-like curls or cords, of a rioh creamy white,
whioh covered every part of their bodies.

The poodle, or what I take to be a poodle cross, is, I understand, in
great request among the “ one-horse ” sportsmen of the Continent, those
gentlemen who think of the currant jelly, and mean the pot to boil, and
who are still in the backward stage of sport our ancestors are represented
to have occupied in the words of the song—

Shoot how you oan was then the plan,

Some hundred years ago.

For such a purpose a large poodle with a dash of spaniel would seem the
very thing to be desired. There is no lack of reasoning power in the
poodle, and his widespread olfactories seize the slightest particle of the
tainted gale and unerringly lead him to his prey, whilst the spaniel oross,
or even a rough terrier or a hound one, would improve his coat for marsh
and river work, and give him more dash and go.

In this oountry pure poodles are not worked, nor are there any longer
to be found, unless it be in rare instances, his close ally, the old water
dog, oommon in the beginning of the century, and specimens of which I
have seen at work in its fifth deoade. There has of late been in the
columns of the Field a suggestion made to introduce poodle blood in our
retrievers, and the idea met with considerable support. I cannot see the
necessity for it, but I should not hesitate to introduce it into my kennels

F F﻿426

British Dogs.

were I an Irish water spaniel breeder, and, indeed, I think I could safely
undertake, in seven or eight generations at most, to manufacture a breed
identical with these by orossing poodle and large land spaniel.

The remarkably high intelligence of the poodle and his marvellous
powers of scent mark him out to the sportsman as worthy of a
higher destiny than to be compulsorily habited as the buffoon of the
canine race merely to pander to a frivolous taste.

I by no means object to any person indulging in the exercise of his
own peculiar eccentricity in dealing with his dog if no injury can follow,
but to three-parts shave a long thick coated dog, and in this climate
exhibit him on a show bench in mid-winter, is not right. Youatt,
whose name is still and will continue to be honoured by his veterinary
brethren, writing of this dog, says, “ It should be remembered that
he was not designed by nature to be thus exposed to the cold of
winter, and that there are no dogs so liable to rheumatism, and that
rheumatism degenerates into palsy.’ ’

From a show point of view I also object, unless the system of prize
giving be somewhat modified, and the skill of the perruquier, who most
successfully displays his fantastic tricks on the dog, shonld receive the
prize, and not the substitute for a dog which his craft has created.

The poodle is par excellence the “tricky dog;” a high intelligence,
strong love for his master, a naturally cheerful temper, and a liking for
fun make him at once a bright and cheerful companion and a very apt
scholar, and innumerable are the tricks he may be taught. This,
however, is not the place to go into that subject.

In classifying the poodles for show purposes, I would be disposed
to recognise only the corded, or, as Iprefer to describe them, those whose
hair falls in regular hard ringlets, the thickness of goose quils or lesB ;
and to divide these into the black and the white. I would ignore the
coarse and open woolly coated or fluffy sort, aB unmistakably having a
bar sinister in their escutcheon. Popular opinion—or rather, let me
say, the views of those who rule over us in doggy matters and wield
public opinion by the power of their position—is for the time against me,
so I can no more than act up to our motto, “I Dare” ’vent my own
opinions, and, in the words of another, “ bide my time.”

There are a vast number of small white dogs, or white with lemon
patohes, open haired, with a more or less strong tendency to curl,﻿The Poodle.

427

accepted by the general public as small poodles, which, I believe, for the
most part, to be a crosB of small poodle and Maltese terrier. These run
from 41b. np to 81b., or even 101b., and are much prized by ladies. I
wish a breed of these small white cnrly-coated pets could be established
for the sake of the judges at our shows, where these pets often turn np,
and under circumstances which would render it more agreeable to give a
prize than to pronounce the inevitable fiat which condemns them to the
abyss of mongrelism. They are certainly both prettier and more
amusing as pets than those shivering, semi-nude wretches, yolept smooth-
haired toy terriers.

I should describe the poodle, when in his natural state, as a well-built
and fairly-proportioned dog—a medium between the lightness of the
whippet and the heaviness of the bulldog. The length and density of his
coat make him look heavier and less active than he really is. In height
he may vary from, say, 14in. to 19in. or 20in.

The head should be large, the skull well domed, with considerable
width between the ears.

The muzzle should be rather short and truncated; when shaved and a
moustache left it has a pointed appearanoe, but it is really not so, or
should not be so.

The forehead Bhould be high and prominent.

The eyes should be Bmall, dark, bright, and intelligent to a high
degree. They should light up the faoe, whioh, as the dog seems to study
his master, wears a peculiar expression of combined gravity and drollery.

The nose should be expanded, that is, the nostrils wide, and black in
colour.

The ears Bhould be long, and covered with the fine ringlets described
above ; they Bhould be set on low and lie close.

The neck should be rather short than long, the thick clothing shorten-
ing its appearanoe.

Chest must be pretty deep and not very wide, or the dog will be slow
and clumsy ; the baok straight, with loin strong.

The fore legs must be straight, the hind legs fairly bent and Btifle
hook well let down ; the feet large tor the size of the dog, and rather
spreading, although not flat or weak.

The tail is usually docked, when left on it is of moderate length, oarried
well up at an angle of about 45deg., and well covered with hair in ringlets.

; ; 2﻿428

British Dogs.

As to the coat, I have already stated that I look npon the ringlet ooat
as the true poodle coat, and the open woolly one as a modification of it
from crosses.

In colours, the pure white or pure black are to be preferred, but there
are good specimens combining these colours, in whioh cases they appear
in patches. Youatt gives an engraving of one, a black and white,
which was copied in Stonehenge’s “ The Dog,” and a dog exactly corre-
sponding to that engraving, and a first-rate specimen of a poodle was
some years ago in the possession of an innkeeper in Burton-on-Trent.
There are also specimens of a rufus colour, and although a black or a
white may be preferred, red coloured ones with all points good should
rather be encouraged than tabooed.

The proportions of weight to height at shoulder may be put as about
l£lb. to the inch, but in some of the white corded specimens the propor-
tion of weight would be greater.

Chapter VII.—THE MALTESE TERRIER.

By Corsincon.

At.t. English writers, new and old, that I have consulted, agree in one
thing, and that is, that in centuries long past Malta furnished toy dogs
for the “dainty dames and mincing mistresses” of both Greece and
Rome.

It also appears to be a general agreement among these writers that
the island of Malta is identical with the Melita ascribed by ancient
writers as the home of these pet dogs, and, further, that we originally
obtained the breed from that place, although some of them recognise the
fact that no proof of that exists.

Dr. Johannes Cains says (writing, be it remarked, of the toy spaniel
of his time) : “ They are called Meliti, of the Island of Malta, from
whence they were brought hither.”

In the part of this work dealing with toy spaniels I have expressed
myself respecting the looseness and inaccuracy of Cains, and the habit he
evidences of taking things at secondhand, and his tendency to moralise﻿The Maltese Terrier.

429

rather than desoribe, and I ventured to offer the opinion that he really
was describing the trne, though diminutive, spaniel of his time, and had
got his historical recollections mixed up with his facts of the day. I
think- it is not at all unlikely that there existed in England toy dogs
from the Mediterranean of the type we now recognise as the Maltese, and
that the learned doctor was not sufficient of “ a fancier ’ ’ to discriminate
the minute differences between one toy and another.

Strabo, who, so far as I am aware, was the earliest writer to refer
specially to these toyB, does not give Malta as the native place of these
dogs, but, on the contrary, writes as follows : “ There is a town in Sicily
called Melita, whence are exported many beautiful dogs, called Canes
Melitei. They were the peculiar favourites of the women; but now
(a.d. 25) there is less account made of these animals, which are not
bigger than common ferrets or weasels, yet they are not small in their
understanding nor unstable in their love.”

Strabo must have been wanting in the organ of comparativeness, or
the weasels of his time were of Brobdignagian proportions compared
with ours ; but the point is if Melita, in Sicily, was the birthplace of
the Maltese so-called dog, why ascribe its origin to the island of
Malta P

As I have said, every English writer I have consulted seems to have
taken it for granted that the dog we call Maltese originally came from
Malta, but not one offers the slightest proof in support of the assump-
tion. It would be needless to go through the works of these writers
seriatim. From “Idstone” I should have expected something more accu-
rate and scholarly than the slovenly article he has given in his book, and
coming to “ Stonehenge ” I am aghast with wonder and amazement. He
seems to have lost his compass, and at the meroy of wind and tide goes
see-sawing between Malta and Manilla—those wide extremes—a hopeless
wreck out of whose hull we cannot get any cargo worth landing.

In his earliest work on the dog he describes the breed as nearly extinot,
but, although “ soarce, still to be obtained in Malta.” He, however, in
the same work gave an engraving of a dog, as a Maltese, imported from
Manilla. In “ The Dogs of the British Islands,” still hankering after
Malta as their birthplace, he confesses his inability “to traoe any records
of the dog, after many inquiries made amongst residents in Malta.”
Well, if Strabo is right this iB not to be wondered at any more than﻿430

British Dogs.

that these and other inquiries should have created in Malta a supply of a
factitious article to meet an unintelligible demand.

Whether the dog we now call a Maltese terrier be a descendant more
or less pure from the breed Strabo wrote of, it is now impossible to say ;
but there is one thing of more practical value, and that is that those
who affeot the breed nowadays, at least know the sort of dog they refer
to by that name, and in the minds of breeders, judges, critics, and
fanciers, there should be a clearness of meaning as to the points whioh,
aggregated, make up the dog, from which there should be no getting
away.

Prom this point of view it is lamentable to think that “ Stonehenge,”
who has been accepted as an oracle on such subjects, should have given
the weight of his name to the contradictions and absurdities whioh mark
his several articles on this breed.

In the 1872 edition of his “Dogs of the British Islands ” he discards
the Manilla dog, and gives his readers an engraving of Mandeville’s
Fido, then at the zenith of his fame, and states the dog’s height to be
llin. at shoulder to a weight of 6£lb., whilst from tip to tip of ears the
dog is said to have measured 21in. These figures condemn themselves.
In this edition we are told that the coat “ should be long, and fall in
ringlets, the longer the better.” In the 1878 edition it is said “ there is
a slight wave but no absolute curl.” In the six years, I suppose, the
tyre women who dress these toys had succeeded in ironing the ringlets out.

“ The eyes,” he says, “ should not show the weeping oorner incidental
to the King Charles and Blenheim.” Enquiry among exhibitors wonld
have shown him that “ Weeping ” is one of the most tiresome things
exhibitors of Maltese have to contend against. The watery discharge
stains the white hair a dirty red.

“The ears,” we are told, “are long,” which is not the case; the
skin, or flap of the ear is short, but the hair upon it is long. Further,
“ the roof of the mouth is blaok.” I seldom look into a dog’s mouth,
except to examine his teeth, and consider that, as a proof of quality or
purity of breed, we might as well consider the colour of his liver.
Finally, “Stonehenge” objects to this dog being called a terrier, because
“it has none of the properties of the terrier tribe,” and that “it
approaches very closely to the spaniel.”

Bather strange, this, from the same pen that wrote, “ This beautiful﻿﻿MALTESE TERRIER “HUGH ” (K.C.S.B. 67,
icob’s Prince—Dam Lady Giffards Madge.﻿The Maltese Terrier.

431

little dog is a Skye terrier in miniature,” and I should think most
admirers of the breed will agree with me that comparison to a bulldog
would have been quite as near the mark as comparison to a spaniel.

By what system of selection these dogs have been brought to their
present form I cannot say, although it is not difficult to imagine several
ways of arriving at the end whioh has been gained. I, however, accept
the dog as he is, and call him a Maltese terrier, quite certain that at
least he has as good a right to be called terrier as Maltese.

Among the earliest and most successful of exhibitors of this variety
stands Mr. R. Mandeville, who for a considerable time held undisputed
Bway. I believe Mr. Mandeville still breeds a few, but rarely exhibits.
The last time his Fido competed was at the Crystal Palace Show, 1878,
when I, acting as judge, placed him second to Lady Giffard’s Hugh, and
before Lord Clyde, a decision which Mr. Mandeville expressly endorsed.

Hugh and Lord Clyde are brothers, being out of Madge by Man-
deville’s Fido, and their sire, Prince, is by his Old Fido; and, indeed,
all the Maltese terriers of any note that are shown are more or less
purely of Mandeville’s strain.

Breeders of this variety are few in number. At the present time, Mr.
J. Jacobs, Maltese Cottage, Headington Quarry, Oxon, is, I think, the
principal one ; whilst on the show bench Lady Giffard’s exquisite little
pets Hugh, Lord Clyde, Rob Roy, Pixie, Mopsey III., &c., are each
more oharming than the other, and prove invincible wherever they are
shown.

The general appearance of these dogs depends muoh on how their toilet
has been attended to. In Bhow form they are little animated, heaps of
pure white glistening silk. The long straight hair falls evenly all over
the body, on the head it iB so long that it quite covers the whole face,
but it is kept parted down the centre and brushed aside, to show the
long Dundreary whiskers and moustache, with the bright black peery
eyes Bhining like diamonds, and almost outdoing the jet-like nose in
depth of oolour. The head, faoe, and muzzle, if carefully examined,
will be seen to show more terrier than spaniel character, and the ears,
though small, should fall, and are well covered with long, soft, straight
hair, which falls almost to the ground.

Although the coat hides the shape of body, enough is seen to show
the dog is short backed, and the carriage of tail adds to this appearance.﻿432

British Dogs.

It is carried over the back or hips, but not so tightly as should be the
case with the pug and Pomeranian. The tail should be abundantly
fringed with long flowing hair.

The subject of our woodcut is Hugh, the property of Lady Giffard,
Brightley Oakley, Redhill. Hugh, when drawn, was between 4 and 5
years old, so just at his best, Maltese not maturing early. He has taken
prizes wherever shown ; and, indeed, there is now no Maltese to come
near him except his younger brothers, Lord Clyde and Rob Roy.

The following are measurements of dogs owned by Lady Giffard :

Hugh : Age, 4 years ; weight, 4£lb.; height at shoulder, 8in.; length
from nose to set on of tail, 16in.

Lord Clyde: Weight, 51b.; height at shoulder, 8in.; length from nose
to set on of tail, 16sin.

Mopsey III. : Age, 4 years; weight, 4£lb. ; height at Bhoulder, 7£in.;
length from nose to set on of tail, lS^in.

Pixie : Age 5 years 4 months ; weight, 51b. ; height at shoulder, 8in. ;
length from nose to set on of tail, 16in.

Rob Roy (K.C.S.B., 8732): Age, 2 years 3 months ; weight, 3flb.;
height at shoulder, 7£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 14£in.

Chapter VIII.—THE YORKSHIRE TERRIER.

By Corsincon.

Nowhere in England are dog shows so popular, numerous, and flourish-
ing as in the counties of Lancaster and Tork, and their immediate
borders, and each of the two counties named has given us a new breed—
for the Manchester terrier which we owe to Lancashire is, it must be
admitted, so widely different from the old black and tan terrier as to be
almost, if not quite, a new breed, and the Yorkshire terrier is assuredly
a manufacture of comparatively recent years.

This dog long went by the name of rough or Scotch terrier, and many
dog show committees in issuing their schedules still include them under
that heading ; but to call them Scotch terriers is quite a misnomer, the
true Scotch terrier being a much rougher, shorter, and harder coated dog,﻿﻿﻿The Yorkshire Terrier.

433

of greater size and hardiness, and altogether a rongh-and-tnmble work-
ing vermin dog, with no pretensions to the beauty and elegance of the
little “ Yorkshire swell,” so that it iB rather startling to find this petit
exquisite still called a Scotoh terrier in the catalogue of such an
important and excellently managed Bhow as that of Darlington. The
Kennel Club, and others who have followed them, in making a class for
these dogs, and naming it Yorkshire terriers, have yielded to the per*
Bistence of the “ Country ” in pointing out the absurdity of the misnomer
in general use, and in passing I would observe that to the same paper
very much of the credit is due of exposing the fallacy, and turning into
ridicule the idea prevalent seven to ten years ago, and encouraged by the
newspaper critics and judges of the time, that a colley should be in oolour
“ black, marked with rich orange tan.”

That the Yorkshire terrier should have been called Scotch by those
who, although they may have the credit of producing this dog, probably
did not know of the existence of the real Scotch terrier as a breed,
suggests that at least a terrier of Scotland has had something to do with
his manufacture. Now, among terriers recognised'as Scotch, if not now
peculiar to the country, we have the old hard short coated Scotch terrier
par excellence; the short-legged and mixed-coated Dandie; the Skyes,
with the long weasel-like bodies and long hard coat; and the perky little
prick-eared hard and short coated Aberdonian; and, in addition, the
Glasgow or Paisley Skye, a more toyish dog, shorter in the back, and
comparatively soft and silky in coat, which it probably inherits from
a Maltese terrier oross. My theory, then, is, respecting the origin of
the Yorkshire terriers (and I admit it is only a theory, for the
most diligent and repeated inquiries on my part in all likely or
promising quarters have failed in elucidating reliable faots, and none
certainly contradictory of my views), is that the dog was what gar-
deners call “ a sport” from some lucky combination of one of the
Scotoh terriers, either the genuine Skye or the Paisley toy, and one of
the old Boft and longish coated black and tan English terriers, at one
time common enough, and probably one with a dash of Maltese blood
in it.

However first obtained, we have at least got them now, and most
owners are satisfied if they oan claim a strain of the blood of the
famous Huddersfield Ben, who combined in himself the blood of three﻿434

British Dogs.

illustrious predecessors — Walshaw’s Sandy, Eamsden’s Bounce, and
Inman’s Don ; and most of the celebrities of the day boast of Ben blood,
and there is never any lack of good ones to come to the front when there
is a chance to jostle the holders of show honours from their ooveted
position. It must never be forgotten, however, that those we see at
shows are the crime de la crime, shown at their very best, and in parade
uniform ; and it is not all that are pure bred that turn out fit for show.
Much depends on their preparation, but there are pure specimens that
cannot be prepared, and always look scrubby and ragged.

Although they are essentially toys, they are not wanting in pluok, and
some of the breed have been good rat killers. A noted breeder has told
me one of his celebrated Bhow specimens once won fourth prize in a
considerable sweepstakes, although quite without training or preparation,
and many of them are perfect little spitfires, sharp as needles, and make
excellent house dogs from their alertness.

Artificial means are used to encourage and stimnlate the growth of the
hair. The hind feet are kept encased in chamois leather boots, so that,
even should they scratch, the claws being covered, the coat is neither
broken nor pulled out, and the diet is carefully regulated so as to
obviate heat of the blood and skin disease. Various applications to
the skin are used to stimulate the growth of the hair, concerning which
much mystery is affected. Some years ago I recommended to a breeder
in Hanley a preparation for this purpose, and as he has recently written
to The Bazaar newspaper recommending it to others as having proved
successful in his own hands, it may be of use to repeat it here. It is
a liniment consisting of the following ingredients, and mixed artem
secundem, as any chemist and druggist knows how :—Strong mercurial
ointment loz., spirit of hartshorn loz., tincture of cantharides ^oz., essen-
tial oil of nutmeg £oz., and camphorated oil, 17oz. A little of this
should be well rubbed into the skin at the partings ; the whole of the
body should not be dressed at once, but the liniment should be used
daily on portions of the body alternately—for instance, one side one
night, the other side the following, and the head, neck, and breast the
third. Cocoa nut oil, too, is a capital thing for promoting the growth of
and softening the coat, and when at home and in preparation for shows
the coat may with advantage be freely dressed with it. It ma'y be
necessary to say, in respect to the use of the liniment recipe, for which is﻿The Yorkshire Terrier.

435

given above, that as some dogs are much more tender in the skin than
others, its effect should be watched, and if undue irritation is produced
by it, it should, for use on such dogs, be weakened by mixing with it a
portion of plain olive oil, and the bottle should always be well shaken
before using its contents.

The crowds of ladies attracted to the range of crystal and mahogany
palaces, where these little beauties luxuriate on silk and velvet cushions,
see little of their make and shape, concealed as it is with an abundance
of flowing hair, arranged with all the art of the accomplished perruquier ;
and it is quite amusing to see the amount of preparation these little
oreatnres undergo before being carried before the judge.

When born the pups are very dark, and a story is told of a celebrated
judge who, having had a bitch about to become a mother, presented to
him, when the pups came duly to hand drowned them “right off,” and
wrote to his friend that there must have been some mistake, as the
pups were as black and tan as Manchester terriers. The tail is docked
whilst the pups are with the dam, a disoreet proceeding, or it is to be
feared some of them would show their Maltese origin by carrying the
caudal appendage tightly over the hips.

The head is small, rather flat on the crown, and, together with the
muzzle, muoh resembles in shape the Skye terrier.

The eyes, only seen when the “fall ” or hair of the face is parted, are
small, keen, and bright.

The ears, when entire, are either erect, with a slight falling over at tho
tip, or quite pricked. Lady Giffard’s Katie, a very good specimen, had
perfeot natural prick ears, but the ears in most specimens are cropped.

The general shape, as seen in show specimens, is to a considerable
extent formed by the coat, which, brushed down to the ground on each
side, gives a square and level appearance, the back being straight and
level, must not be too long, but a happy medium between the proportions
shown by the Dandie and fox terrier.

The legs and feet, although scarcely seen, must be straight and good,
or the dog would have a deformed appearance.

The tail is usually docked, and shows abundance of feathering.

The coat must be long, straight, and silky ; any appearance of curl or
orimping is objectionable, and if wavy at all, it must be very slightly so;
but many excellent specimens have the coat slightly waved. I do not﻿436

British Dogs.

know the utmost extent to which the coat has been grown, but should
suppose lOin. or 12in. not uncommonly reached, and it should be abundant
everywhere.

The colour is one of the most essential things to be looked for in the
Yorkshire terrier ; so important is it, and so fully is this recognised by
exhibitors, that it is said some specimens are shown at times not quite
innocent of plumbago, and other things judiciously applied. They are
really blue and tan terriers, and the blue ranges from the clear silvery hue
to a deep sky blue and a blue black, all dogs getting, I believe, lighter
in colour as they age. The tan on the head should be golden, and the
“ fall,” or hair, over the face, gets silvery towards the ends; the tan is
deeper on the whiskers, and about the ears, and on the legs.

They vary in size considerably, so much so, that I advocate most
strongly making two classes for them, for it is utterly absurd to clasB
any of this breed as a broken-haired terrier, as the Kennel Club do,
regardless of the plain meaning of the words. What can be more
stupid than to give one of these terriers a prize in his own proper class,
and under his proper designation, and his own mother a prize in the
broken-haired toy class P

The principal breeders and exhibitors are Mrs. M. A. Poster, who,
indeed, seems to have quite a monopoly of this breed, and to be invariably
successful as an exhibitor; Miss Alderson, of Leeds, who, however,
seems of late to have retired from the arena; Mr. Abraham Bolton, of
Accrington ; Mr. Cavanagh, of Leeds ; and Mr. Greenwood, of Bradford.

Measurements of Yorkshire Terriers :

Mrs. M. A. Poster’s Smart: Age, 3 years; weight, 101b.; height at
shoulder, 12in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 22in.

Mrs. M. A. Foster’s Sarndy : Age, 2 years ; weight, 4Jib.; height at
shoulder, 9in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 19in.

Mrs. M. A. Foster’s Pride: Age, 4 years ; weight, 41b. ; height at
shoulder, 8£in.; length from nose to set on of tail, 18£in.

﻿﻿SO


.. JAMES FLETCHER’S ITALIAN GREYHOUND “WEE FLOWER” (K.C.S.B. 771﻿GROUP II.

Diminutives of already mentioned varieties and
foreign toy dogs occasionally met with at
our shows.

Including :

1.	The Italian Greyhound.

2.	The Black and Tan Toy

Terrier.

j. The Blue and Tan Toy
Terrier.

4.	The White Toy Terrier.

5.	The Long-haired Toy

Terrier.

6.	The Japanese Pug.

J. The Broken-haired Toy
Terrier.

8.	The Chinese Crested

Dog.

9.	The Chinese Edible

Dog.

The dogs I have classed together here are widely
different in their physical traits, and it is only as toys
and curiosities that they are akin, and can be ranked
together.

Chapter IX.—THE ITALIAN GREYHOUND.

By Coesincon.

No more elegant dog exists than a good specimen of the Italian grey-
hound .

There is in snoh a refinement of form and a grace in every movement
that inevitably attracts the dog lover and oompels his eulogies.

The beanty of form is matohed with a delicacy of frame exquisitely﻿438

British Dogs.

attractive, and mark this pretty pet as fit only for the companionship of
women, whose tender handling alone is light enough to Bave from effaoe-
ment the peach bloom that seems to adorn them, and preserve from
destruction a frame too fragile for the rough touch of masculine hands.

This view may arise from some unusual and unaccountable idiosyn-
cracy on my part, for certain it is that these most frail specimens
of canine flesh are almost entirely exhibited by men, rarely by women;
but I must confess I always experience a feeling of relief when I see
such brittle looking goods as Italian greyhounds freed from the coarse
and heavy hands of men exhibitors.

Ab the name imports, Italy is the native home of these exquisitely
lovely dogs; yet it is not under the azure skies of Italy that they are
brought to the greatest perfection, but rather under clouds of dense
London smoke, and in defiance of the raw, chilling mists that surround
them in their Scottish home. Those sent us from Italy are comparatively
coarse, but, under the magic skill of English breeders, the lines of beauty
natural to the breed are retained and developed, all coarseness is smoothed
away, and the delicacy and refinement which is their inheritance improved
upon.

As a breeder of Italian greyhounds at the present time I should say
Mr. Bruce, of Falkirk, is facile princeps, although Mr. Steel makes a
good second, and between them they make the Italian class at the Edin-
burgh shows one of the features of that gathering, for nowhere else is
seen classes of this kind so strong in numbers and quality, and the best
of winners at English shows of recent years, Wee Flower, Crucifix,
Bosy Cross, Bankside Lily, and others have been bred by these two
gentlemen.

Mrs. Temple, of Morley Wilmslow, Cheshire, also possesses a good
strain, which she brought from Italy more than forty years ago, and has
improved upon by careful selection in breeding. This lady does not
exhibit and, therefore, her dogs are not so well known as they deserve to
be; but several from her stock have, I understand, successfully competed
in the show ring.

For a number of years there was nothing that had a chance in a show
against Mr. Macdonald’s famous little Molly, a dove-coloured specimen,
diminutive in size, and of exquisite proportions. Molly lived to the very
considerable age of twelve years, and literally went to her grave burdened﻿The Italian Greyhound.

439

with honours. Unexceptionally good as she was, I am of opinion that a
small lovely dove-coloured speoimen of Mr. Bruce’s, the name of which
I am uncertain, is all over quite as good as Molly was, and it is quite
certain that competitors now are much superior as a whole to those
Molly had to meet in her time.

The Italian greyhound is a diminutive of the gallant coursing breed;
but whereas, in the latter we look not only for beauty of outline, but
also insist on strength, as shown in great muscular development, in the
former we are satisfied with elegance, if there is but sufficient vitality
to give activity and playfulness. In play, the graceful movements of the
Italian greyhound are seen to perfection, their attitudes being strikingly
beautiful; in their ordinary walk they have a mincing gait, varied by
more spirited motions, prancing like a high stepping and restive horse.

The weight of the Italian greyhound for show purposes should not
exceed 71b., and those between 41b. and 51b. are preferred.

One of the greatest defeots met with in this breed is the high forehead
and prominent skull, introduced, probably, by resorting to a oross with
the apple-headed toy terrier in the desire to reduce the Bize. The head
should be flat in the skull, long, and gradually tapering to the point of
the muzzle.

The eyes should be rather large, and with a languishing expression.
This dog is of a very loving disposition, showing strong affeotion to its
owner. Eyes too full and watery are not uncommon, and are a great
blemish.

The ears should be small and thin in texture, carried & la greyhound.

The neck must be long, thin, and supple.

The coat should be remarkably fine, soft, short, and silky. The oolours
are various, and all very beautiful, red fawn, golden fawn, blue fawn,
dove colour, lavender, cream colour, white with dark points, blue, and
parti-coloured. The latter is not generally admired, yet there is a fawn
and white, shown by Mr. Bruoe, which I oonsider very handsome;
brindle I do not remember to have seen.

The question of colour must always be one of individual taste, but
self colours are preferred, and the chief consideration is to have them
decided and rich.﻿440

British Dogs.

Chapter X.—THE BLACK AND TAN TOY
TERRIER.

By Corsincon.

Some score years ago a large proportion of the black and tan toy terriers
were of the sort called by “ fanciers ” apple-headed ones—that is, round
skulled with prominent foreheads—and this variety owed the features
referred to to a cross with the King Charles spaniel.

Another variety, finer in the head and generally showing the wheel
back and tucked-np flank of the Italian greyhound, owed its peculiar
features to a cross with the last named dog.

Both of these have now, however, given place entirely, or to a great
extent, to a much neater animal, showing truer terrier character, being, in
fact, the Manchester, or black and tan terrier, dwarfed by constant selec-
tion of the smallest, and continued in-and-in breeding.

This continued consanguineous breeding is not, however, an unmixed
good, and in some instances appears to have already been carried to the
utmost brink it can be with safety, great delicacy of constitution being
one result, and another is the loss of hair ; many specimens being almost
bare on head, face, and neck.

ThiB is a great disfigurement which can be permanently remedied by
judicious breeding. I have, however, in another breed lately found
astonishing results in the quick growth of hair by rubbing in twice a day
a mixture in equal parts of petroline—suoh as is burned in lamps with
wick—the oil, not the spirit, Field’s ozokerine, and the lotion, Spratt’s
patent make for growing hair on dogs. As the use of this mixture was
eminently successful, I think it is worth mentioning that others may try it.

The points are the same as in the larger breed, and to that standard
readers are referred. There is more difficulty experienced in producing a
good one, well marked and rich in colour of the desired size, which is
from 31b. to 51b. at most than there is in breeding dogs 201b. and over.

As they are thin in the skin and but lightly covered with hair, these
fragile creatures should be kept clothed when out of doors.

——﻿The Blue and Tan Toy Terrier.	441

Chapter XI.—THE BLUE AND TAN TOY
TERRIER.

By Corsincon.

This very pretty toy dog receives scant justice at shows where he has
either to compete against his black and tan brother, or take his place in
a variety clasB, and in either case generally goes down before a better
known and more fashionable rival.

This dog possesses distinct character, and is well worth cultivating; the
oolonr is a pale or greyish bine, and the tan markings should be distri-
buted as in the black and tan variety; the tan is, however, always pale,
and I have not seen specimens with the distribution of the markings and
their clearness quite satisfactory.

All the more reason for breeders to take them up and improve on their
present form.

At one time in London, and also in the West of Scotland, and, pro-
bably, other parts of Great Britain, there existed a blue terrier known as
the Bine Paul; these are still at rare intervals to be met with, and I
think it highly probable that the toy blue and tan is a descendant of the
Blue Paul. According to tradition the latter was brought to this country
by the notorious pirate, Paul Jones, but where brought from tradition
sayeth not.

The toy blue and tan is generally apple-headed and small and pointed
in the muzzle, and generally wanting in coat.

This dog should, bearing these differences in mind, be judged by the
same scale of points as the toy black and tan.


G G﻿442

British Dogs.

Chapter XII.—THE WHITE TOY TERRIER.

By Coesincon.

Occasionally a diminutive white terrier of 31b. or 41b. weight turns up
at a Bhow, but they do not seem as yet to be looked on as worthy of
distinct classification.

Those I have seen have all been too bullet-headed, but by close in-
breeding of the now well established white English terrier, a very pretty
class of toys might be produced, and, if bred in sufficient numbers, a class
would soon be made for them at our best shows.

Chapter XIII.—THE LONG-HAIRED TOY
TERRIER.

By Coesincon.

In the classes for toy terriers other than smooth-haired, the winners
are invariably small Yorkshire terriers, and it would be far better to
make two classes for the last named, dividing them by weight, than have
the small ones shown under the title now adopted.

Chapter XIV.—THE JAPANESE PUG.

By Coesincon.

I must confess this is a dog I know very little about; they crop up,
however, pretty often at our shows, and give one the impression of being
a cross between a King Charles spaniel and a pug.﻿The Japanese Pug.

443

In “Jesse’s Researches ” the following quotation from Sir Rutherford
Alcock, long resident in Japan, is given : “ And first I am to find a pair
of well bred Japanese dogs, with eyes like saucers, no nose, the tongue
hanging out at the side, too large for the mouth, and white and tan, if
possible. My dogs are chosen, a species of King Charles spaniel
intensified ; and, by-the-bye, there is so much genuine likeness that I
think it probable the Merry Monarch was indebted to his marriage with
a Portuguese princess for the original race of spaniels.’’

The Japanese, it is said, give their toy dogs, when puppies, a spirit called
sahi to keep them small. It is a singular coincidence that a similar habit
obtains among the lower order of dog fanciers in this country, where gin
is given to stop the growth of puppies.

The following remarks on the breed are from the pen of Mr.
Marples:—

“ This variety of dog, specimens of which I have heard Mr. Lort remark
he had seen some twenty years ago, and which have since been occasionally
imported into this country, but not to any great extent, owing, no doubt,
to the great distance, has not been propagated much hitherto, as
the breed is almost a rarity, and up to the present has not even been
introduced into any work upon dogs that I am aware of.

“Since coming into possession of the Japanese pug Ming Seng, I
have been led to make some little inquiries respecting the breed, and
the information I have gathered places the matter beyond dispute that
such a breed does exist in Japan, and is as distinct as the pug of our
own country and quite as common. It has been inferred by some that
it may have been obtained by a cross with our King Charles and English
png or some other dog, but this I consider quite fallacious. The dog
resembles a King Charles but little, excepting that it is short in face,
while in build and general contour it is totally different, and the coat
is perfectly straight, and being more profuse than the Charlie is scarcely
a likely result from a cross with a smooth-haired dog.

“ Mr. G. W. Allen won the silver medal at the Kennel Club’s Alexandra
Palace Summer Show in 1878, in the class for small sized foreign dogs,
with Shantung (so named after a province, in which is the Palace of
Pekin, where the dog waB born). This is a black and white specimen,
possessing the same characteristics as Ming Seng, but a little larger,
being about 141b. weight. The Rev. G. F. Hodson won at Birmingham,

G G 2﻿444

British Dogs.

in 1873, ■with a light red and white Japanese png, the parents of whioh
were imported by a friend of his in the 1st Dragoon Guards, and obtained
by him from the Summer Palace of the Emperor of China. This dog was
also of the same type, and an excellent specimen. A Mr. Currie, of
Manchester, has a bitch with which he has also won a prize or two at
local shows; and together with others that I have seen, coupled with
other facts, are conclusive evidence that the breed is one peculiar to Japan,
where it is kept in its purity and highly prized by the aristocracy of that
country, as well as being a Royal favourite there.

“ A Japanese gentleman, now residing at Blackburn, where he is acquir-
ing a knowledge of the cotton business at the mills of Messrs. Briggs,
heard of my Japanese pug, and on seeing it, to satisfy a friend of mine,
favoured me with the following :—

“ [copy.]

“ ‘ Rose Hill Mills, Blackburn, September 19, 1879.

“ ‘ I have seen Mr. Marples’ Japanese pug, and I, being a native of
Japan, can testify to its being a very good one; in fact, I have seen scores
in my native country, and I do not remember ever seeing a better. They
are mostly black and white in colour, and in coat, size, and general con-
formation I should say the little dog Ming Seng is a correct repre-
sentation.

“‘(Signed) Yamanobe Takeo,

Tokio, Japan.’

‘ ‘ The prevailing colour is undoubtedly black'and white, though there
are some of a different colour—red and white, brown and white, and self
colours —the Rev. Mr. Hodson’s to note. The coat, in texture, re-
sembles most to my mind that of a good colley, and also the architecture
of the animal, excepting, of course, his extremities. In disposition the dog
is very lively and intelligent, and, like our own pug, extremely sensitive.
He soon becomes attached to his home and its inmates, to whom, under
kind treatment, he shows great affection, but is somewhat sullen with
strangers, and feels and remembers the least chastisement. Like the
French poodle, however, he is remarkably intelligent and may be taught
many tricks.

“ Ming Seng is now a little over 3£ years old, and was imported by
a sailor on board a merchant vessel trading between London and Japan,﻿The Japanese Pug.

445

in tea and fancy Japanese goods, and sold to a gentleman in London,
who afterwards sold him to a Mr. W. J. Lucas, of Blackburn, an old
fancier, from whom he was purchased by me. I hare exhibited the dog at
several shows in 1879, in variety classes, under Messrs. Lort, Hodson,
Cowen, Gamon, Skidmore, Brierley, and Adcock, with the following
result:—Equal 1st at Manchester (Royal Liverpool and Manchester
Society’s Show), Preston, Bootle, and Famworth ; 1st Southport, and
very highly commended Wigan, &c.

“ Ming Seng is black and white in colour (showing a preponderance of
the former), 91b. weight, measuring only fin. in muzzle which is square,
and, like many of our pugs, he has the protruding tongue ; head
lofty, eyes large and lustrous, being set in wide apart, ears small
and dropping forward at the side of head. He is very symmetri-
cally built, being short in back, has a deep chest, straight limbs, and
is harefooted ; his tail is twisted tightly over the hip, the hair upon
which, as on the rest of the body, being long, profuse, and perfectly
straight; the fore legs are well feathered, the hair on the hind legs being
short up to the hock, resembling, as I said before, a colley in this respect.
He is very sensible and affectionate to those with whom he is acquainted,
and can perform several tricks, which, no doubt, have been taught him
on board ship during his somewhat long passage.”

I do not neoessarily endorse Mr. Marples’ opinions. On the subject of
evidence he appears to be much more easily satisfied than I should be.
When he compares this dog in “ coat and architecture ” to a colley, I
must emphatically express my dissent.

Mr. Marples would have been aB near the mark had he compared the
Japanese pug to a hippopotamus.

Since writing the above, I saw at the New York Dog Show, where I
acted as one of the judges, a olass of nine, very level in quality, and all of
Ming Seng’s type; they were classed as Japanese spaniels.﻿446

British Dogs.

Chapter XV.—THE BROKEN-HAIRED TOY
TERRIER.

By Corsincon.

These are, as their name imports, small broken-coated terriers, alike in
every point but size to their larger congeners.

They have to compete at shows against Yorkshires, which is unfair to
them. The Kennel Club have even designated the class as for “ broken-
haired terriers,” and allowed long-haired Yorkshires to win, which is not
only absurd but unfair to exhibitors of true broken-haired terriers.
Their weight should be under 51b.

Chapter XVI.—THE CHINESE CRESTED DOG.

By Corsincon.

This is quite a rarity in this country, but a few have been exhibited,
and attracted considerable attention as curiosities.

Eather higher than a fox terrier, they are also longer in the back, and
altogether lighter in build, approaching nearer to the greyhound in
conformation.

They are, except on the head, along the top of neck, and at the end of
tail, quite hairless, if we further except single hairs scattered about the
body at wide intervals.

On the head the hair is rather profuse, forming a crest, and the
tuft on end of tail is quite bushy; and these, with the spotted or
marbled skin, give the dog to English eyes a more singular than
attractive appearance. Along the top of the neck the hair grows short
and fairly thick, something like the “ hogged mane of a pony.”﻿The Chinese Edible Dog.

447

Chapter XVII.—THE CHINESE EDIBLE DOG.

By Corsincon.

Dogs so described in catalogues and frequently shown are mostly of a
rufous colour, and in appearance resemble Pomeranians, but are much
ooarser made.

I know nothing further of them than having seen them at shows, and
inolude them in this list solely because few London exhibitions are with-
out specimens in the class for foreign dogs.

Chapter XVIII.—EXHIBITING TOY DOGS.

The condition in which dogs are shown has much to do with their
suooess or failure to secure the coveted premier position in the ring, and
this is especially the case with toy dogs.

These varieties are often valued on account of quite arbitrary points
of excellence, such as, it may be, length and straightness of coat, richness
of colour, or certain markings, and although these exist they will not be
seen to perfection unless the dog is shown in perfect health, and properly
prepared for exhibition. The show is a gala day for them, and every
dog should, when paraded in the ring, wear its best bib and tucker.

In long-haired varieties, such as Yorkshire and Maltese terriers,
Pomeranians, &c., preparation must be commenced some time before the
Bhow, and sedulously carried on day by day.

Constant combing and brushing tends to increase the growth of coat,
as well as to make it lie in the desired orderly manner.

They should receive a final polish immediately before being taken into
the ring.

Taste should be observed in the furnishing of the exhibition box in which
they are exposed to public view and admiration.

The smooth-haired Borts, such as pugs, Italian greyhounds, and toy
terriers, must also have their share of grooming—for pugs an ordinary
flesh glove does well to dress them with, but for the very fine skinned﻿448

British Dogs.

Italians and some toy terriers that is too rough, and nothing suits better
for dressing them with than a soft chamois leather.

In all varieties it is important to have them neither fat nor lean. The
points are best shown when the dog carries an average quantity of flesh,
put on by plain feeding, which preserves the health and develops spirit
and playfulness.

Chapter XIX.—TRAINING PET DOGS.

The first thing to be taught a house dog is habits of cleanliness.

It stands to reason that to ensure this the animal must be let out at
regular intervals during the day, and this should be done both the last
thing at night and first thing in the morning.

Regularity in feeding has also an excellent effect.

Whenever a dog offends it should be scolded or whipped and put out,
care being taken that the dog knows what he is being punished for. When
he learns to connect the offence with the punishment he will cease to
offend.

If these lessons are persistently given, most dogs will learn to ash when
they want to go out, by going to the door, barking, or otherwise indicat-
ing their wishes.

It is a good plan to have one certain place to feed the dog in, and
bones should not be given in the house, or the dog will probably contract
the habit of hiding them in inconvenient places.

Small dogs generally give a preference to a box or basket to sleep in,
and something of the sort should be provided ; but it is quite a mistake,
even with the most delicate, to wrap them up in blankets, &c., as is often
done. This makes them supersensitive to cold when taken out.

Pugs have naturally a thick, warm coat, althongh it is short, and do
not require to be clothed ; but the very thin-skinned Italian greyhounds
and toy terriers should, except in very warm weather, be clothed when
taken out of doors, and when at exhibitions.﻿Standard of Excellence.

449

Chapter XX.—STANDARD OF EXCELLENCE
FOR TOY DOGS.

/.—The Blenheim Spaniel
and the King Charles

Spaniel.	points.

Symmetry and condition ...	25

Head ..................... 15

Stop ...................... 5

Muzzle.................... 10

Eyes ...................... 5

Ears ..................... 10

Coat and feathering ...... 15

Colour.................... 15

Total ................100

II.—The Pug.	points.

Symmetry, condition, and

size.................... 15

Body ...................... 10

Legs and feet ............. 10

Head and muzzle ........... 15

Ears ....................... 5

Eyes ...................... 10

Markings (mask, wrinkles,

and trace) ............. 15

Tail ...................... 10

Coat and colour............ 10

Total ................100

III.—The Pomeranian.

Points.

Condition, symmetry,	and
size		... 20
Coat 		...	15
Head and muzzle	...	15
Eyes and ears 		... 10
Legs and feet 		... 20
Tail 		... 10
Colour		... 10
Total 		... 100

IV.—The Poodle.	points.

Condition and symmetry ...	20

Head and muzzle ............ 15

Eyes ....................... 10

Ears ........................ 5

Coat ....................... 20

Neck and Bhoulders.....	10

Back, loin, and quarters ...	10

Legs and feet .............. 10

Total ..................100

V.—The Maltese Terrier.

Points.

Size, symmetry, and condi-

tion			25
Coat 			25
Colour			20
Eyes 			10
Nose 			10
Tail 			10
Total ...		100
VI.—The Yorkshire		
Terrier.	Points.	
Symmetry 		...	15
Clearness in blue		15
Distinctness and richness of		
tan 		...	15
Length of coat 		...	10
Texture of coat		...	10
Straightness of ooat...	...	10
Ears 		...	10
Tail 		. . .	5
Condition in whioh shown		10
Total ...		100﻿450

British Dogs.

VII.—The Italian Grey-

hound.	Points.

Size, symmetry, and condi-
tion .................. 30

Head ...................... 10

Ears and eyes ............. 10

Legs and feet ............. 10

Conformation of body	...	20

Coat and colour............ 15

Tail ....................... 5

Total ...	... 100

IX.—The White Toy
Terrier.

The same scale as applied to
White English Terriers.

X.—The Long-haired Toy
Terrier.

Same scale as for Yorkshire
Terriers.

VIII.—The Black and Tan
Toy Terrier and the
Blue and Tan Toy
Terrier.

The same scale of points as
Elack and Tan Terriers.

XI.—The Japanese and
Chinese Dogs.

No scale of points for judging
these has been settled.﻿APPENDIX.

Breeding, Rearing, and General
Management of Dogs.﻿﻿APPENDIX.

The Management of Dogs.

Including:

1.	Object of Breeding.	3. Rearing.

2.	Breeding.	4. General Management.

Chapter I.—OBJECT OF BREEDING.

By Corsincon.

The immense rise in market value of dogs of all breeds during the last
twenty years, as a consequence of the competition promoted and en-
oouraged by exhibitions and of the constant free and full discussion
oarried on in the press respecting the points of value of the several
varieties, together with the general increase of wealth and wider interest
taken in the sports in whioh dogs are useful and participate, has led num-
bers of persons to take up dog breeding, partly as a hobby, and partly
with a view to the profits it is supposed and hoped may be made thereby.

When people read about puppies being sold for .£10, <£15, and .£20
each, which in their youth it would have been difficult to find homes for
at one-tenth the money, the conclusion is bo temptingly in accord with
the desire that it is too often aocepted without sufficient examination, and
as often leads to disappointment and loss.

In this, as in so many other ways of life, I believe we have two very
distinct classes, each in their way successful; but the two classes I refer
to hold ideaB of suooess as wide asunder as the poles.

The one I oall the genuine breeder: the man who takes hold of a
variety and says, this dog would be improved for purpoBeB of utility and﻿454

British Dogs.

beauty, by the breeding out or modifying certain points be exhibits
strongly, and the development of others of which he is deficient; and
who with this as his primary object sets about the work on certain intelli-
gible and accepted lines, which, however, does not necessarily preclude
experiment which reason, stimulated by observation, may suggest and
approve.

Sooner or later, in defiance of ill-luck, accidents, and all adverse cir-
cumstances, that man will make a name for himself as a breeder, for he
will have attained an object in itself worthy, and which, by its inherent
excellence, compels recognition and praise. Such a breeder was the late
Mr. Laverack, and, following a similar course with like success, I point
with equal force to Mr. R. LI. Purcell Llewellyn, whose kennel of setters
is among the largest and is the highest and most equal in quality I have
seen.

Men who are guided by these high and worthy motives are not so few
as many suppose, for they are often the least heard of, as they value
much more highly the improvement of their kennels than the taking of
prizes. Dogs these breeders must, as a matter of course, have to dispose
of; but they do not breed to sell; that is rather an accident of their
pursuit.

I have not a word to say against breeding for sale ; it is a perfectly
legitimate business and an interesting pursuit, and intelligently followed
may be made profitable ; but to improve the various breeds of dogs and
still make things pay is by no means easy, because such breeders have
to compete with another and altogether less worthy, and sometimes even
unscrupulous, class.

Profits on the sale of goods of almost every kind depend very much on
the publicity the goods and their owners receive. Most of us have to
trust to our tailor for the quality of cloth he supplies us with; and in
dogs there is not one buyer in a hundred capable of making a selection
for himself farther than pleasing his own fancy.

Taking advantage of this, there are a very large number of breeders
who, possessed of prize dogs, breed them with no reference to their fit-
ness to mate, and with no other object than to sell their produce at the
highest possible price. To select the good and put down the useless is
never dreamt of. The weedy and the ricketty, if they can boast of prize
winning relatives, will bring so many pounds from Borne foolish person or﻿Breeding.

455

another, and so the dealing breeder does his best to degenerate whatever
breed he takes in hand.

It is hopeless to reform these mercenaries; but as I wish this book to
be really serviceable, I warn the tyro, and all who desire to possess good
dogs, to beware of a class that is so widespread.

Chapter II.—BREEDING.

By Corsincon.

I shall not attempt to deal with the subject of breeding in all its
aspects. There are many questions connected with it still unsettled,
and, however interesting the discussion of these, this is not the place for
it, even were the writer capable of doing it justice.

I shall endeavour to confine myself to, and make as clear and explicit
as possible, laws to be observed and lines to be followed by all who would
breed dogs successfully. That there are such laws enunciated by physio-
logists and proved correct by experience no one can doubt, and the
want of attention to them is a fruitful source of disappointment.

One of the very commonest errors of the inexperienced is to expect
that the union of two good-looking dogs must of necessity produoe
handsome pups ; another common and still more fatal mistake is to accept
prize winnings, however great, as sufficient credentials of a good sire;
and a third mistake is to look for good pups from a worthless ill-bred
bitch, however good the dog she has been bred to.

Like produces Like.—That like produces like is a good maxim for
breeders to remember if it be correotly valued, which it can be only when
taken in conjunction with other weighty considerations.

The laws of heredity play an important part, and cannot be left out
of the acoount. But with dog breeders, as a rule, too little attention
has been paid to it.

Throwing Back.—Everybody who observes at all knows how common
it is to see a ohild who bears a much stronger resemblanoe to an uncle,
aunt, oousin, or other collateral than to the parents, or in direot line the﻿456

British Dogs.

child may inherit the features or peculiarities of one of the grandfathers
or grandmothers. And so it iB in the lower animals ; and this tendency
to throw back is seen to go still farther in some instances of crossing
when the artificial distinctions produoed by domestication and selection
in breeding are thrown down, and an effort is made by nature to repro-
duce an animal in, if not its original, at least in a long past, form. This,
in the dog, is shown in the gaunt form seen in many mongrels, and in
its most pronounced form often assumes that of his congener—the wolf.
I do not say that the crossing of any two varieties of our domestic dog
will produce one or more pups with a wolfish semblance, but that, if
allowed to breed promiscuously, unmistakable traits of the wild dog
will be developed.

We have here, then, two rules to be observed in breeding, which, at
first sight, appear to be antagonistic, but are really not so. Like breeds
like, but as each sire and dam have also had a sire and dam that may
have possessed very distinctive characteristics, the proneness to throw
back is merely a proof and confirmation that like does produce its like,
although a generation may have been skipped in the development of a
special feature or set of features.

Importance of Pedigree.—The foregoing shows the vast importance of
pedigree, and on both sides this should be studied, and the prevailing
family characteristics carefully considered. The kennel chronicles,
calendars, stud books, and systems of registration, public and private,
now accessible, are of the greatest help to the breeder, and will become
more so year by year, although the best of them are far from being so
useful as they might be made. For instance, if in the registration of
puppies the date of service, relative to the period of oestrum, were care-
fully given, we should soon have data on which to determine the dis-
puted point as to whether the time of service influences the sex of the
progeny.

I presume readers to be acquainted with the theory held by many
observant breeders, that if the bitch is served at the early period of her
heat the progeny will be mostly bitches, and, on the contrary, if near the
end of the oestrum, the majority of the puppies will be dogs. No one
person’s experience, however extensive, can be taken to settle this ques-
tion, which is of very great practical importance, not only in reBpect to
dogs bnt other stock.﻿Breeding.

45 7

If, however, the Kennel Club were to adopt a Bystem of careful
registration, they would have in a few years an accumulation of faots
from which deductions oould be safely made ; and the same means might
be used to elucidate points which, if at present they can be called facts,
are at least doubtful and obscure.

In-a/nd-In Breeding.—This is a phase of the subject which has given
rise to muoh discussion, opinions in favour of and against the practice
being pretty equally divided.

From my own observation and lessons gathered from the experience of
others, I am of opinion that close consanguineous breeding is the most
powerful means we have to determine character and establish type; but,
if continued without a resort to the renovating influence of blood from a
removed, although, it may be, a collateral line, the result will be loss of
stamina and the production of a too nervous temperament.

In-and-in breeding, in its strictest sense, is, of course, mating dogs
from the same sire and dam, and continuing that course. Sir John
Sebright, a high authority on such matters, carried out a series of
experiments in this direction with the result that hiB dogs became weak,
small, and weedy ; and other experimentalists agree with him. In-and-
in breeding is not, however, to be entirely neglected, for, aB already
observed, when it is required to fix and determine a desirable mental
characteristic or physical trait possessed in common by brother and
sister of the same litter, to breed them together is the most certain way
to ensure its perpetuation ; and in this way only, I believe, can type be
established. And, to keep up the physique of the breed without destroy-
ing its distinctive features, breed/ing in the line—that is, from animals of
collateral descent—should be resorted to, and not from dogs of entirely
different blood.

Breeding for Colour—Breeding for Size—or with any other Buch specific
object, must be undertaken on established physiological laws, and fully
taking into account that there are always complex influences at work, all
of which have to be considered and allowed for; that Uke breeds 1/ike is
true only in a limited sense, for inherited characteristics on both sides,
even such as are latent in the individual, assert their influence and re-
appear. On thiB subjeot there is a pamphlet by Mr. W. B. Tegetmeier and
Mr. W. W. Boulton, M.B.C.S., called “Breeding for Colour, and the
Physiology of Breeding,” which is well worth the careful perusal of

H H﻿458

British Dogs.

every breeder. Both of these gentlemen are well known as scientists
and most successful practical breeders of various domestio animals,
and both have succeeded in establishing new varieties. Mr. Boulton’s
black spaniels possessed such a distinctive family character that they
could be recognised at a glance. As a result of Mr. Boulton’s great
experience, he has come to a conclusion of much importance, namely,
“ that the sire influences the progeny principally in colour and outer
contour, and the dam in constitution and all vital characteristics and
peculiarities of temperament, instinct, and family or hereditary stamp,
quality, or feature.” Whether that view receive complete endorsement
from other breeders or not, no one of any practical experience will
undervalue the importance of breeding only, or with rare exceptions,
from pure bred dams. It would be impossible to establish a kennel
of even character and high quality from brood bitches of different and of
mixed blood.

(Estrum or Heat of Bitches.—The desire to reproduce is not constant
in the dog, but occurs at periods varying in individuals even of the same
variety, in some as often as every six months ; but whether six, seven, or
eight months, the period is generally kept to with tolerable regularity,
so that an observant breeder who keeps a kennel record can tell pretty
nearly when his bitches will be in season.

It is not necessary to describe in detail the symptoms of heat—there is
general disturbance and excitement of the whole system ; it is, I believe,
in many instances possible to tell by the eye of the dog, certainly the
expression is altered, as well as the manners and action. Often, with
the careless owner, the fact first becomes evident to him by the nuisance
of a pack of strange dogs about the place, making night hideous by
occasional prolonged sounds, between a howl and a whine; but before
that he should have been aware of a change in his dog, and have kept
her up. On examination the external organs of generation are seen to
be enlarged and vascular, and for some days, about the middle of the
time, there is bleeding from the vulva; when this has stopped is by most
breeders considered the most favourable time for her to visit the selected
mate ; the period of heat lasts about three weeks.

Thirst is an accompaniment of heat, and the bitch should have access
to water constantly. If it is not intended that she should breed, care
must be taken to keep her locked up, for many show great cunning at﻿Breeding.

459

this time, and will not miss a chance to steal away and seek mates for
themselves. If not intended to breed it is absolutely necessary she should
have cooling medicine—a dose of ordinary black draught answers well,
and may be given twice a week ; the food, too, should now be light, and
the proportion of vegetables increased and flesh meat decreased. This
course will often prevent fits, which, in those predisposed to them are
apt to appear at this time.

When the bitch has been kept up there will, in all probability, at
the end of the usual period of gestation—nine weeks—be a secre-
tion of milk. This should be drawn off, or the accumulation in the
teats and other lactiferous glands will produce indurations ending in
tumours. The mammas should in such cases be bathed with warm water,
and afterwards rubbed with camphorated oil, or, if there is muoh
heat and swelling, add to the camphorated oil one-third part of brandy
and the same proportion of spirit of hartshorn. At the same time
recourse should be had to doses of black draught twice a week and a light
diet.

It is a practice too general to keep bitches year after year and prevent
them from breeding. This is strongly to be condemned. It appears to
me an unjustifiable interference with nature, and it is certain that the
consequences to the animal are seriously detrimental. Not only are they
from this cause liable to suffer from scirrhous tumours, but it begets a
plethoric state of body and partial deposits of fat around the ovaries and
elsewhere that interferes with the healthy functional operations of im-
portant parts, and leads often to acute disease, and, where life is pro-
longed, it is as a burden to the dog and a nuisance to her owner.

Breeding is a natural, healthy, and necessary thing. It is specially
required by highly fed dogs living luxuriously, as a means of using up
their excess stock of material, and, therefore, all bitches should be
allowed to breed at least occasionally.

Selection of Sire.—This must be made after consideration of the
various phases of the subject of breeding and the several influences at
work affeoting the character of the future progeny.

In the present day the rage with inexperienced breeders is for dogs
that have taken prizes. Except for the purpose of giving a fiotitious
value to the puppies, prize winnings have no value in a stud dog. On
the contrary, a dog that has been muoh shown, and, in consequence, oon-

H H 2﻿460

British Dogs.

etantly undergoing preparations, being, an it were, wound up to the highest
tension his system will bear, is not so likely to get good stock as another
equally good dog of the same strain that has been allowed to live more
naturally. Just so in breeding greyhounds. I would rather breed
from an own brother than from a great winner who had to stand
numerous trainings, if the brother was a fair dog, and had not been
hard run or often severely trained, than I would from the winner
himself.

Impregnation.—On this subject Blaine observes, that in some cases it
takes place at the first connection, at others not until the Becond, third,
or fourth, and states that in one instance he had deoided proofs that
impregnation did not ensue until the seventh warding, and he reoom-
mended, to ensure prolific intercourse, that the dogs should be left
together for some days, adding that this course is specially likely to be
necessary in the case of delicate and pampered animals.

I think it may be stated as the general practice of those who place
their stud dogs for hire at the service of the public to allow two visits at
an interval of a day or two. It is also a common occurrence that the
animals are perfect strangers to each other, and are never together except
during the necessary time.

Probably these facts, taken together, supply a sounder reason in
accounting for the large percentage of disappointments owners of brood
bitches meet with than, as is done, by loosely referring to the season as the
oause. I confess I do not know how the phrase and the belief it expresses,
“ This has been a bad breeding season,” originated, but it is very
common, and appears to me to be baseless if it implies that the meteoro-
logical conditions of the seasons influence impregnation and the prolificacy
of the bitch.

As opposed to such an opinion, in support of which I have never heard
a reason advanced, I am rather disposed to credit these frequent dis-
appointments to ignoring, or at least not fully complying with, the laws
and conditions under which nature has ordained that reproduction in the
dog shall take place. That one or two visits only should in all cases be
held as sufficient, seems to be contradicted by facts however convenient
it may be to owners of stud-dogs, who, of course, have an eye to fees,
and natually wish to utilise to the fullest the fee earner.

Again, we must remember that not only are the organs more directly﻿Breeding.

461

concerned in generation in a highly susceptible state, but the entire
system is affected, and during heat the bitch is subject to deeper and
more lasting impressions than at any other time. All breeders of expe-
rience know that bitches at that time take strong fancies. I had, some
years ago, a Dandie Dinmont that became enamoured with a deerhound,
and positively wonld not submit to be served by a dog of her own
breed. There are on record reliable instances where the mental impres-
sion made on the bitch by a dog that has not had access to her, has
been clearly seen in one or more of her litter, sired by a totally
different breed of dog. Taking these facts into consideration, I think
the common practice of permitting merely flying visits of the shortest
possible duration more likely to account for the disappointments alluded
to, than the peculiarity of the season to which they are so often referred,
and advise that the animals should be kept together for some reasonable
time, which is assuredly what takes place when the dogs are left to
themselves.

Super fetation.—The bitch having a compound uterns is capable of
impregnation by two or more dogs during the same heat, and will produoe
in one litter pups clearly distinguishable as the produce of different
sires. The appearance of these uterine brothers and sisters in the litter
of a bitch that had been put to a valued dog of her own breed is, of
oourse, most annoying, and in all oases must be the result of another
having had aocess to her. Frequently this arises from the careless-
ness of servants, and it is always safest to keep the bitch under lock
and key, for with the slightest chance given she will steal away in search
of a mate of her own selection. Only in one or two other ways, so far
as I know, can these objectionable strangers in the litter be accounted
for. These ways we will now consider.

Antecedent Impressions.—It is one of the most strange and remarkable
faotB, as it is one of the least understood in connection with breeding,
that the union of a bitoh for the first time with a dog by which she
conceives frequently exerts an influence on subsequent litters, or, as
my own observations lead me to think, on individual pups, but not all,
in subsequent litters. Instances of this must have come under the
notice of most breeders, and the most careful and observant have from
their experience recorded instances in proof of it, so that it is now an
aooepted fact.﻿462

British Dogs.

This shows the urgent necessity, especially with young bitches, of
acting on Somerville’s advice—

Watch o’er the bitches with a cautious eye,

And separate such as are going to be proud.

If this is not done an undesirable union will almost certainly be the
result, and the value of the bitch for stock greatly reduced.

In such a case many breeders would at once put the strayed bitch
down or discard her from their kennels ; but as it is not absolutely certain
to follow in every such instance that subsequent litters will be affected,
and, as before stated, I do not think that in any case all pups in any
subsequent litter would be so affected, I should not, if the bitch was
much valued for brood purposes, go so far, but keep her for future use
and see the result.

Perhaps, still more curious and inexplicable is the startling fact that
the mental impression made on the mind of a bitch by a dog she has
been denied sexual intercourse with, affects most sensibly the progeny
resulting from a sire of a totally different form and colour. On this
subject I cannot do better for readers than quote at length from such a
high authority as Delabere Blaine, who had the distinguished honour
of being called by his contemporaries “ the father of canine pathology.”
Mr. Blaine says:

“ Superfcetation is apt to be confounded with, or its phenomena are
sometimes accounted for by, another process, still more curious and inex-
plicable, but which is wholly dependent on the mother—where imprint-
ings which have been received by her mind previous to her sexual
intercourse are conveyed to the germs within her, so as to stamp one or
more of them with characteristic traits of resemblance to the dog from
which the impression was taken, although of a totally different breed
from the real father of the progeny. In superfcetation, on the contrary,
the size, form, &c., of the additional progeny all fully betoken their
origin. In the instances of sympathetic deviation, the form, size, and
character of the whelps are principally the mother’s, but the colour is more
often the father’s. It would appear that this mental impression, which is,
perhaps, usually raised at some period of oestrum, always recurs at that
period, and is so interwoven with the organization even, so as to become
a stamp or mould for some if not all of her future progeny, the existence
of which curious anomaly in the reproductive or breeding system is﻿Breeding.

463

confirmed by acts of not nnfrequent occurrence. I bad a png bitch
whose constant companion was a small and almost white spaniel dog of
Lord RiverB’s breed, of which she was very fond. When it became
necessary to separate her on account of her heat from this dog, and to
confine her with one of her own kind, she pined excessively; and, not-
withstanding her situation, it was some time before she would admit of
the attentions of the pug dog placed with her. At length, however, she
was warded, impregnation followed, and at the usual period she brought
forth five pug puppies, one of which was perfectly white, and although
rather more slender than the others, was nevertheless a genuine pug. The
spaniel was soon afterwards given away, but the impression remained ;
for at two subsequent litters (which were all she had afterwards) she
again presented me with a white pug pup, which the fanciers know to be
a very rare occurrence.”

I have not met with an instance such as the above in my own expe-
rience, but cases almost identical have been told me as coming within
the scope of the experience of friends. Mr. James Pratt, who has been
so successful a breeder of Skye terriers, has told me that one of his
bitches produced a pure white Skye under similar conditions; and I
could multiply such, but that must suffice on the subject of results from
mental impressions.

Dr. Boulton, to whose and Mr. Tegetmeier’s instructive pamphlet on
the “ Physiology of Breeding ’ ’ I have already referred, quotes from Mr.
E. L. Layard an instance of a blood mare whose progeny, a stallion and
afterwards a mare, were submitted to the judgment of an observant
naturalist, who declared in both instances, fine as the animals were, they
bore the impress of a donkey, and, although this opinion was at first
received with derision, subsequent investigation proved that the dam of
these animals whilst running loose as a filly had been covered by a
jackass and produced a mule foal. In the “Philosophical Transactions,”
1821, it is on record that Lord Morton, having bred from a Quagga and
a chestnut mare, and afterwards bred the mare to a black Arabian
horse, the progeny exhibited in colour and mane a striking resemblance
to the Quagga. Similar results have been seen in breeding pigs, and a
ourious effect of terror on a pregnant cat is given in “ Transactions of
the Linn man Society,” vol. IX : “ The tail of the cat was accidentally
trodden on with suoh violence as to cause the auimal intense pain. When﻿464

British Dogs.

Bhe kittened five young ones appeared perfect in every other respect
except the tail, which was in each one of them distorted near the end
and enlarged into a cartilaginous knot.” Owners of long and straight
tailed bull bitches may perhaps learn from this how to give the oaudal
appendages of expected puppies the desired kink.

From the foregoing it will be seen that even very close intimaoy
between a bitch during oestrum and a dog she fancies may influence the
progeny, although the dog has not warded her; and further, that if a
second dog gains access to her at any time during heat, the probabilities
are strong that superfcetation, or a second conception, will take place,
resulting in two distinct sets of pups, half brothers or sisters to
each other.

I am aware that Dr. Gordon Stables, in his book, “ The Practical
Kennel Guide,” expresses an opposite opinion ; he says, “It is usual to
keep her (the bitch served) a week, after that time there is no danger,
even if they should meet and be embraced by mongrels,” adding, “ I am
quite convinced of this.” He gives no reasons for his opinion, and has
the misfortune to be diametrically opposed to our best physiologists and
most observant breeders.

Stud Dogs and their Services.—Having selected and engaged the services
of a stud dog, unless the owner is a man in whom you can place implicit
confidence, either go with the bitch yourself or send a confidential agent.

The mere “ dog fancier ” is too often a man who considers his gains
only, and does not hesitate to substitute one dog for another when to do
so will ensure him a fee, and when the pups disappoint expectations the
blame is laid on the dam. The true dog-lover, being really interested in
dogs and their improvement for their own sake is above the temptation
to practice such a fraud, and if his dog is temporarily disabled from any
cause will, of course, honestly say so.

In like manner, having higher objects than gain, he will not only let it
be known that approved bitches only will be allowed to visit his dog, but
will exercise a wise discretion in carrying that resolve out, rigidly exclud-
ing all worthless animals, which, put to the best dogs, it is hopeless to
expect to bring forth anything but weeds and thereby deteriorate the
breed.

Breeding New Varieties.—Of the very numerous varieties now classified
at our dog shows many are of quite recent production. The very plastio﻿Breeding.

465

nature of the dog, the readiness with which those breeds, the moBt
widely different in physical features, mate with each other, and the
great facility with which varieties can be altered or modified, give a wide
scope for the production of new varieties.

This is specially the case in toy dogs; and I am of opinion that
breeders are not sufficiently speculative in this direction, for I am
convinced any intelligent man following the principles established, and
setting out with a definite purpose, would find his pursuit as successful
as interesting and profitable. To give one instance only, why should we
not have as many various coloured Pomeranians as we have Italian grey-
hounds ? Some of the handsomest Pomeranians I ever saw were a deep
reddish fawn. A few years of judicious breeding would, I am convinced,
establish a variety of any desired hue.

Age at which to Breed.—House dogs and others leading a very artificial
life often have the functions of reproduction developed at an early age.
I had a terrier that, from inattention to the fact that she was in heat was
not secluded, was the mother of four pups before she was niue months
old. As a rule, the smaller breeds mature earlier, and are in season at an
earlier age than the larger breeds, and in all breeds there are individual
differences in this respect, but most bitches are in season once before
they have attained their full size, and they should in suoh case be
invariably put by. It must be evident to all that, whilst her own frame
is still in process of being built up and matured, she is not in the best
position to nurture whelps.

During the first oestrum which appears after the bitch is full grown, if
the season of the year is suitable, she may be bred from if in perfect
health; if she is not, breeding is better postponed.

It should also be known, too, that the seleoted dog is in health and free
from mange or other skin affeotion of a contagious nature ; also that on
neither side is there hereditary disease, which, although not shown in tho
dogs themselves, is likely to be developed in their offspring.

Large dogs, such as mastiffs, St. Bernards, Newfoundlands, otter
hounds, deerhounds, greyhounds, &c., should not be bred from under two
years of age, and even in Bmall breeds it is better they should be almost,
or quite, eighteen months old.

Although oestrum does in many caseB come on twice a year, the breed-
ing and rearing of two litters a year, or even of three in two years, is﻿466

British Dogs.

too exhausting on the system of any dog. No bitch should be allowed
to breed oftener than once a year.

Best Season for Breeding.—Although pups are born at all seasons, they
are not always reared, and late autumn and winter ones are often rickety,
and from my own experience, and that of many friends, I believe they
rarely ever possess the amount of vitality of spring and early summer
pups.

The spring is Nature’s great reproductive season; winter the natural
time of rest from and preparation for the process.

In the spring a fuller crimson comes upon the robin’s breast,

In the spring the wanton lapwing gets himself another crest.

And, in plain prose, in the spring only does the dog undomesticated
breed. Not only is it, therefore, the time most natural, but I believe,
as a rule, the strongest litters are then thrown, and there is the obvious
and very great advantage that the progeny have before them the genial
influences of summer in which to grow and prepare to do battle with the
numerous ills of puppyhood.

Sv/nvmary.—If you aspire to be a breeder, in contradistinction to a
person who has dogs that breed, before forming an alliance between
two dogs, consider the whole subject as I have endeavoured to explain
it, with all other information bearing on it available to you; and
having, as you must have to be a breeder, a clear and definite object
for your attainment, weigh the various influences at work and their pro-
bable effect in forwarding or retarding that object and act accordingly.

Axioms fob Bbeedebs—The following, bearing on the physiology of
breeding, may, at least by the inexperienced, be safely accepted as axioms
and acted upon until such time, should it ever arrive, that by extensive
experience and careful observation he finds one or more of them to be
wrong. They represent the result of experiment and observation by the
most capable, and, as accepted laws by our best breeders, should carry
weight with the tyro.

“ Like breeds Like ; ’ ’ but this must be considered in conjunction with
other laws and influences at work.

“Breeding Back,” or the law of Atavism, often asserts itself unex-
pectedly and suggests the necessity of a careful inspection of pedigrees.

“In-and-in Breeding” is useful as a means of establishing and con-﻿Rearing.

467

firming type, but if persevered in to excess produces loss of physique and
excessive nervousness.

“Superfcetation and Antecedent Impressions.”—A bitch is capable of
having two sets of pups by different sires in one litter. The sire of her
first litter often gives an impress seen in pups in subsequent litters, and
even strong mental impressions produced by the bitch being enamoured
with a dog denied connection with her sometimes influence the form and
oolour of pups the produce of another dog.

Breed from fully developed and healthy animals, and in the spring or
early summer only.

Chapter III.—REARING.

BiEABing may properly be said to begin with the bitch in pup, for unless
she is properly cared for, and kept in good health, she cannot be expected
to produce strong healthy pups, or to be in a state to nourish them
properly when bom, and until such time as they can feed independent of
her.

On the proper nourishment of pups and the careful guarding of them
against the aocidents and diseases to which they are liable, the future of
the dog largely depends; it is, therefore, a subject demanding in all
phases and details the consideration of the breeder, and his constant and
practical attention.

Writing, as I do, for the instruction of the inexperienced, and to give
reminders and suggestions to the experienced, it will be convenient and
of practical advantage to deal with the subject in detail, and first for
consideration is the treatment of—

The Bitch in Pup.—Breeders should keep a record of the visits of
their bitches, that they may know when, if a bitch proves pregnant, she
may be expected to whelp. As an aid to this, and in other kennel
matters, dog owners are greatly indebted to W. Kelsey—himself a
successful breeder and exhibitor—for his “Kennel Record,” published
by John Van Voorst and Co.; in it is a table, with double columns, one﻿468

British Dogs.

showing the date of visit, the other the day the pups are due, calculating
sixty-three days as the period of gestation, which is in the very large
majority of cases correct. Having this knowledge before him, the owner
has the line of treatment indicated, as that must vary as time proceeds.
For the first two or three weeks no alteration whatever in diet, exeroise,
or work is needed, except a slight inorease in food, if the bitch shows a
desire for it.

It is a good practice to have the bitch thoroughly washed on returning
from a visit to a strange kennel.

Grooming should be practised regularly, and close attention given to
the skin, so that the appearance of parasites, or of any eruption, may be
promptly checked, by appropriate measures being adopted.

I have for some time adopted the plan of giving a dose of worm medicine
about the second or third week, and I think it is beneficial, even if the bitch
is free from worms ; the vermifuge and cooling medicine given following
it does no harm, but good, and if, as is so often the case, these parasites
are present, it lessens the chances of the pups being born with the germs
in them, aB they so often are, and have them developed whilst still in
the nest. So far, this practice has been with me only experimental;
but as I think it has had good results, and cannot do any harm if a
safe vermifuge is administered, I .recommend it to be tried by breeders.
I give a dose of Spratts Patent Cure for Worms at the end of the
second week, and if worms are expelled I repeat the doBe in four or five
days.

It is not easy to tell whether the bitch is in pup before the fourth week
has passed ; by that time the teats begin to enlarge, and there is a ridge-
like swelling between them; from that time forward the flanks begin to
fill out and the belly becomes round, until about the seventh week, when
it falls considerably, becoming pendulous, and as the pups become due
inclines backward.

Exercise should be continued until the last, but after the first few
weeks no hard exhaustive work should be done, nor violent exercise, suoh
as raoing or jumping allowed, and during the last week walking exeroise
only should be given.

The bitch should be kept in good condition, but not fat or fleshy, for
that not only interferes with parturition but is apt to prevent the
Becretion of milk, and both produce and aggravate milk fever.﻿Rearing.

469

Bitches in pup should have at all times access to clean water, as some
are, when in that condition, unusually thirsty.

Many suffer from sickness when in pup, and these should have a wine-
glassful of lime water in sweet milk two or three times a day. The food
for the last four or five days should be sloppy but nutritious, such as
broth thickened with stale bread or biscuit and a little cooked meat.

Where a number of dogs are kept, the bitch in whelp should be
separated from the rest for the last week, as she then becomes restless,
and is anxious, looking out for a plaoe she approves in which to deposit
her young.

Selection of Place for Pupping.—This should be prepared for the bitch,
for if left to herself she will choose some out-of-the-way inaccessible
hole or corner where she cannot be approached or assistance given to her
should it be required, or the pups—about which the owner is sure to be
curious—examine d.

Let it be in a sheltered place, under cover of course, with a board in
front, not so high that she will have to jump over it and possibly strain
herself, but simply enough to add to the retirement of the nest and to
keep the bedding from being dragged out. It should be on a board floor,
and soft fresh hay is the best bedding. Let there be plenty of room, and
the situation such that there is perfectly free access and unencumbered
action for owner or attendant should it be necessary to interfere. Where
one dog only is kept, and a wooden kennel provided, it should be of the
pattern I reoommended in The Country some years ago, and which I
shall desoribe further on; a kennel of the ordinary kind is the very worst
place a bitch can pup in, as she is sure to get to the far end, and neither
she nor pups can be examined without forcibly dragging them out.

Parturition.—Healthy bitches in fair condition very rarely require any
help or interference, and, in fact, the more they are left to themselves
and the quieter they are kept the better.

In very difficult and protracted oases which exhaust the animal, doses
of liquor ergota, a fluid preparation of ergot of rye, administered in a
little water every half hour, is often of great service in accelerating the
births, the doBe for a dog 601b. to 1001b. being thirty drops. If the
bitch is very much exhausted, a very small quantity of brandy in a little
gruel may be given. In wrong presentations and oases of deformity it
is always best to seek the assistance of a qualified veterinary surgeon.﻿470

British Dogs.

At all events, never interfere too soon in any case of prolonged or
difficult parturition, and never let a pretentious fellow, ignorant of the
anatomy of the animal, interfere with force, as they are so apt to do.

Treatment of the Suckling Bitch.—For the first few days the food should
consist of strong broth, bread and milk, oatmeal porridge and milk, and
such like food, with but very little meat, and all should be given slightly
warm. From the first, however, well boiled paunch, being easy of diges-
tion and assimilation, may be given, and one or two meals of boiled
bullock’s liver is beneficial, acting mildly on the bowels.

On the day after pupping she should be enticed out or taken out for a
short time, that she may empty herself, and she should then be offered
food, and each day she should be kept a little longer from the pups, as
the exercise taken is necessary and beneficial to her, and increases her
milk. She will, as the pups grow, require more food, which should be given
oftener and contain a larger proportion of meat, but no sudden change to
a meat diet should be made, or it will be likely, confined as she is, to
cause surfeit, and not unlikely even more serious oonsequences.

A little fresh hay Bhould be added to the nest occasionally; and when
the puppies have got their eyes open, take advantage of the dam being
out at exercise to change the bed entirely, cleaning the place thoroughly,
and sprinkling with a little Sanitas or Condy’s fluid properly diluted.

If one or more of the teats appear to be blind or to have got dammed
up, it should be freely bathed with warm water daily, or twice a day, and
then well rubbed with camphorated oil or marshmallow ointment.

Where the puppies are the result of a mdsalUance, or from other causes
it is not desirable to rear them, that wish should be sacrificed in humanity
to the poor mother. The maternal instincts in the dog are remarkably
strong, and it is a most cruel thing to rob her of her puppies, so that at
least one or two should always be left for her to nurse. Another reason
for this is, that with no puppies to draw the milk from her she runs great
risk of milk fever and the formation of tumours in the teats.

Nowadays, however, there are always plenty of pure bred puppies it is
desired to rear, and whose owners are glad of the services of a foster
mother, and if these are substituted for her own her attentions and
affections are soon transferred to the adopted ones, and no harm done.

Treatment of Pv/gs in the Nest.—I am often consulted as to treat-
ment of pups in the nest when they are suffering from various ailments,﻿Rearing.

471

but I think it foolish to force medicine down the throats of puppies at
that age.

In oases of purging, the finger, smeared with milk, which has been
thickened with prepared chalk, may be placed in the pup’s mouth, when
the mixture will probably be swallowed and tend to check the diarrhoea.
Sometimes this is brought on by the pups being kept too close and warm.
Whatever may be the matter with the pups at that early age, it is better
to give the mother a mild aperient and vary the diet than to physic them.

When they begin to crawl about, it is a good plan, where it can be
done, to have alongside the nest a boarded floor, such as an old door or
some such thing, on which is nailed a bit of old carpet or sacking. The
pups, getting a good foothold on this, can creep about easily.

In breeds in which the tail is usually docked this should be done whilst
the pups are still with the mother, and it is well to remove dew claws
then also. The pain caused is very slight, and the mother’s tongue has
the effect of healing and comforting the wounds.

Weaning Pups.—When the dam is strong and has a sufficiency of milk
the pupB should not be weaned before six weeks. All of them should,
for Borne time, have been able to lap well, and even to eat meat and
milk, thick porridge, broth, &c.; but it is a mistake to give very young
pups meat at once on being weaned. That food should be gradually
adopted, a little only, torn into thin shreds, being first given, for they
have not the power of digesting it except in minute quantities.

As the time for weaning approaches the times of the bitch’s absence
from them should be daily more and more prolonged.

Foster Mothers.—It is not an uncommon idea that the foster mother
affects the mental qualities and temperament of the pups, but there is no
ground for it; the milk of the foster mother and of the dam, if they are
both healthy, will answer the same to chemical analysis. The after
education the pup receives will affect the dog’s temper, manners, and
ability for his special work, but the milk that nourishes him affects his
physical development only.

When a foster mother has to be selected, see that she is in perfect
health, and quite clean, free from vermin, &o., and she should not be old,
for then the milk is rarely so good in quality or sufficient in quantity.
Smooth-coated bitches are preferable for this purpose.

To get a bitch to take to the aliens a little patience and tact must be﻿472

British Dogs.

used. If she is kept away from her own pups for a time, until the udder is
full of milk, she will be more likely to let the strange pup suck, as it
will relieve her ; or she may be cheated into accepting the strangers by
putting them, one at a time, whilst she is kept away, in the nest with
her own, and in this way gradually removing her own and substituting
the others. In any case watch her behaviour to the stranger; if she
licks it all is well, but if she treats it as an intruder she should be
muzzled or held; but this is rarely needed if plenty of time is taken, and
patience and gentleness exercised.

Feeding Puppies.—On the feeding the growth and health of the puppies
largely depends. I find them thrive best on a varied diet, everything I
give being well cooked, except that occasionally I give a little sound
lean beef or mutton raw, and this I find, if not overdone, of great benefit
to weak puppies. It should be given finely minced to young ones.

Cows’ milk, it has been contended, produces worms in puppies if
given unboiled. I have never found a single person holding this
opinion who could produce a shred of proof in support of it, and I
think it a theory most unlikely to be correct. Cows are, unlike dogs,
very little subject to worms, and if they were, I doubt very much if the
milk is at all a likely secretion in which to meet with the embryo of
these parasites. I have no doubt, however, that cows’ milk is often too
rich for the assimilative powers of puppies and makes them ill when
given undiluted.

Oatmeal porridge, stale bread, puppy biscuits, with milk, or broth
from sheeps’ heads, rough bones, or pieces of lean meat, a few green
vegetables being added, generally suit puppies well; and a little bit of
dry biscuit and a rough bone too big for them to break, to play with and
exercise their teeth on, is also beneficial.

For the first three or four months they should be fed four times a day,
letting them at each meal eat as much as they will but removing any food
remaining as soon as they appear satisfied.

The dishes should be thoroughly cleansed after each meal; clean cold
water should be always within their reach. The antiquated practice of
putting a lump of roll brimstone in the water has no practical value, the
sulphur being as insoluble as a paving stone.

Fresh air, sunshine, and exercise are aB necessary to healthy develop-
ment as good food and water. The kennel yard should slope so as to be﻿Rearing.

473

kept dry; a southern aspeot is the best. A few empty champagne cases
turned upside down make good seats for them to mount, and the pups
like to play hide and seek round them and get good exercise in clamber-
ing over or jumping on to them.

Occasional runs in field or lane, where the pups can get couch grass,
is beneficial, besides which the change is in itself good for them.

Weak legs and tendency to rickets is best corrected by the above
means, but as an aid lime water (a wineglassful to half a pint of milk),
given daily, and Parish’s syrup of phosphates, called by the druggists
“ chemical food,” given two or three times a day, often does great good.
Cod liver oil is prescribed very much at random. It should not be given
to puppies except in debility; it fattens too much, and a fat heavy
pup is apt to go wrong in the legs.

Vermin.—Puppies are very often preyed on by parasites living on or
in the skin. Leaving out the parasites of mange, they are pestered by
fleas, and also, although not so generally, by lice and ticks; the two
former living on, the latter partially burrowing in, the skin.

Eegular search should be made for these, especially if a puppy is seen
to scratch himself much, which, if the parasites become numerous, he will
do till the skin is broken and nasty sores are formed.

Spratts patent dog soap, which has the advantage of being absolutely
free from poison, is the best and the pleasantest to use I have tried ; it
kills all three parasites named. Field’s medioated dog soap is also very
effectual, but has the trifling disadvantage of being dark in colour. I
objeot to carbolic acid soaps, as they poison by absorption, several suoh
instances having come under my own observation.

Perfect cleanliness in the kennel is the best preventive of parasites
in the pups.

Removal of Dew Claws.—This is best done when the puppies are still
with the mother. All breeds of dogs have these extra toes. In some
oases there is a bony attachment, in others the dew claw is held by a
loose ligament. The nail may be drawn out with a pair of Bmall pincers,
or out off dose to the leg with a pair of sharp shears ; the latter is the
oleaner process.

Cropping the Ears.—This is done when the puppy is about seven or
eight months old. To make a neat job of it, out a piece of paper the
exaot shape it is desired the ears shall be; spread on this some Canada﻿474

British Dogs.

balsam, or a charge made as follows : Canada balsam, 2|oz. ; yellow
rosin, £oz.; melt together, spread on thin leather or paper, and put on
whilst still slightly warm. The dog being held firmly by an assistant,
the operator, with a pair of strong sharp scissors, cuts along the edge of
the pattern paper. Friar’s balsam should be at once applied to stop the
bleeding. The paper with the charge may be left on as a support.

Chapter IV.—GENERAL MANAGEMENT.

Kennels.—The first consideration on becoming possessed of a dog is
where to keep him, and even if intended to be in the house he should
have his own corner, mat, basket, or other place in which to sleep, and
to which he can be sent at any time when he is in the way. For out-of-
door dogs a kennel is absolutely necessary, and on its construction the
health and comfort of its inmates largely depends. Some people seem to
think anything good enough for a dog, and make shift with an old box
or rickety barrel for a sleeping place, where the wind and the rain both
beat on the inmate. It is the duty of every man who keeps an animal of
any kind to look after its health and comfort, and warm dry housing is
essential to that end; barrels, however sound and impervious to rain,
are unsuitable, on account of their shape. A dog should have a flat level
surface to lie upon. When a dog coils himself round for sleep in a barrel,
the centre of his body must be considerably lower than the rest, and
that is unnatural, and must cause discomfort if no worse effects. The
ordinary wooden kennel used for single yard and other dogs is an
abominable contrivance, as cold and comfortless as it is ugly, and when
it has to be moyed from place to place, costs about as much for carriage
as it is worth.

I some years ago, in the columns of The Country, suggested and
described a portable kennel suitable to one-dog men, and since then I
have got a carpenter to carry out the idea, and in this he has admirably
succeeded. The following is a description of the kennel referred to :

The Portable Folding Kennel.—This is made of wood, and when fixed﻿﻿l> s

Plan of Kennel.

Kennel Packed foe Travelling.

PORTABLE KENNEL FOR ONE DOG.﻿General Management.

Ml

for occupancy resembles the old fashioned kennel, except that the door
is placed at one side of the front end instead of in the centre, thus
giving the dog a better chance of being sheltered from cold, wet, and
draughts. It consists of seven pieces, the bottom (E), two sides (BB),
two ends (CC), and the two sides of the sloping roof (AA), and these
are so fitted that no nails or screws have to be withdrawn, but when it
is necessary to take it to pieces to scour or disinfect, or to pack for
travelling, the roof (AA), fitted with metal plugs which go into corres-
ponding holes in the upper edge of the sides (BB), is simply lifted up,
and the two pieces being held together by a long hinge running their
extreme length, fold together. The two end and two side pieces (BB)
in like manner work on such hinges, which are similar to those used
in pianos ; the end pieces (CC), when free from the metal plugs of the
sides, which fit into holes in their edges, are folded down on to the floor
piece (E) ; between the floor and the side pieces runs a piece of wood
(DD, DD) to raise the position of the hinge, so that when released from
the bolts and screws binding them to the bottom and end pieces, the
Bide pieces fall flat over the end pieces, which have been already folded
down, without straining the hinge; under the bottom piece at each
comer is a large brass knob (EFEF) to serve as feet to keep the kennel
off the wet ground, and these feet are fitted with screws, which work
through the intermediate piece referred to into female screws let into the
side pieces. This very materially strengthens the kennel when made
up, and, when unscrewed, although they do not come out of the bottom
piece, they relieve the sides and allow them to be folded down.

It will thus be seen that the kennel may be said to consist of two parts
only, and that these can be taken to pieces and put together with the
greatest ease, no nails and no screws, except those of the feet, having to
be undone, and these latter only partially; and when these two parts are
laid on each other and strapped together the whole kennel occupies no
more room than a large book.

The great convenience of this arrangement for those who are moving,
or wish to travel, taking their dogs with them, is obvious, and it is
equally plain that dogs, being subject to a variety of contagious diseases,
the facility and thoroughness with which these kennels can be cleansed
and disinfected is also a very great advantage.

There is another point yet to be notioed, and that is the fitting of﻿478

British Dogs.

one side of the roof with a hinged lid of nearly its full size, so that
in cases of illness or a bitch having whelps in the kennel they can be
examined and help given when required with the greatest freedom and
ease.

Any intelligent carpenter can make these from the drawings and
description, and the kennel may no doubt be improved upon in some of
its details, but in principle of construction, utility, and convenience it
will be conceded that it is a great improvement on the old fashioned
cnmbersome dog box in common use. Mr. William Holland, builder,
New Thornton Heath, Surrey, makes these kennels in a great variety of
woods, and of several sizes, at very reasonable prices.

The following plans and descriptions of other portable kennels to
accommodate half a dozen dogs were given by a correspondent in The
Gauntry in 1877, and will, I think, prove of considerable use to others
who purpose erecting small kennels with a view of exhibiting and occa-
sionally breeding:

“ If dogs are to be thoroughly clean—and upon this depends their health
—it is absolutely necessary that you should be able to get inside of their
sleeping house, and if breeding is attempted this is more than ever
important. I give the plans which I have adopted, and although they
may contain many errors, as I am not an architect, still I think they
may be found a groundwork to start from. Of course, the idea is to
have them in every respeot portable, and, keeping this in view, to make
them as comfortable as possible.

“ Pig. 1 gives the front view of the sleeping house, the side view of
which may be seen at Fig. 3. This is made to lift bodily in one piece,
and is built of red pine boards one inch thick, tongued and grooved to
make it weatherproof. At the front it is six feet high, falling to five at the
back, so that a man can work comfortably inside. The door must open
outwards, otherwise you will be troubled with straw and rubbish getting
behind it, and it ought to be so let in as to exclude draughts. Two
ventilators, which open and shut at pleasure, are introduced over the
sleeping benches, and this proper attention to ventilation I consider of
great importance. A pane of glass in the door giveB what light is
required, and a swinging panel, which the dogs very soon learn to use,
ensures perfect protection during inclement weather. The panel must
not be made of very heavy wood, and the hinges upon which it is swung﻿PORTABLE KENNEL FOR SEVERAL DOG

Fio. 3. Side View op House and Taed.﻿﻿General Management.

481

must work easily. It should be cut about four inches from the bottom
of the door.

“ Fig. 2 shows the internal arrangements, which consist of two benches
placed so as to be out of the draught, and also to leave a free space for
the dog to get in and out. The benches are placed one foot from the
floor, and a division runs from top to bottom to prevent fighting, which
will sometimes occur. The partition between the benches is movable,
and when a family is expected it is taken out.

“ Fig. 3 gives a side view of the kennel complete. The side of the yard
is made in one piece, with a number of rafters to add strength, and it is
covered with the largest wire netting.

‘ ‘ The doors to the yards are put at the bottom, opposite the sleeping
houses, and to each of these a lock is fixed. Short supports are driven
into the ground, and to them the frames forming the yard are screwed.
When more than one is erected, by being placed alongside of each other
a frame is saved; but the one which forms the partition, instead of being
covered with wire, must be made of boards. The yards are paved with
flags, which are properly laid so as to carry all surface water to a grid,
and in this way the kennels are thoroughly cleaned every morning by the
simple application of some water and a brush. I should have mentioned
that the roof of the sleeping house is covered with felt and then tarred,
the woodwork is painted outside and whitewashed in, and the latter
process should be repeated onoe a month.

“As to cost, I have had three kennels built upon the above plan and
placed side by side by a joiner in the neighbourhrood, who has finished
them in first-rate style for an outlay of £25, and, I must say, I consider
the money well spent.”

In providing accommodation for packs of hounds and other large
numbers of dogs the special circumstances of the locality must often to a
considerable extent determine the particular form of the building, but in
all the main objeots the health and comfort of the dogs should be para-
mount, and this need not exclude considerations of convenience in feeding,
cleaning, &o., for these really are included in the first.

Elaborate ornament might not be in keeping, but even a kennel is
better when architecturally beautiful than if a mere misshapen block.
The place chosen Bhould be on rising ground, so that there may be good
drainage. A light soil is always to be preferred. -On wet clay soils it﻿482

British Dogs.

is almost impossible to keep dogs free from skin diseases, and snoh a
situation induces other ailments also.

Concrete is the best flooring, and it should slope from the dormitories
down to the bottom of the yard, along which there should be an open
gutter running down to a grated entrance to the main sewer, so-that the
kennels can be readily cleansed with water, and get quickly dry. If due
attention is paid to cleanliness in this way, disease will be Icbs likely to
appear and have less inducement to linger, and disinfectants need only
be occasionally used as preventives.

It is generally necessary and convenient to lodge several dogs in the
same dormitory, and these companions should be such as are usually on
good terms with each other, for there is no large kennel in which indi-
vidual dogs are not quarrelsome and spiteful against some other, whilst
with those they like they are quiet and agreeable.

Sometimes there is one dog of such a mischievous tendency, and so
cantankerous, that he proves a perfect nuisance, and there is nothing
for it but to separate him, or he may spoil the temper of many others.

Where stud dogs at the service of the public are kept, kennels separate
and secluded should be reserved for strange bitches, and these Bhould be
invariably cleansed, disinfected, and the walls limewashed on the depar-
ture of each one.

The sleeping benches in the dormitories should not be more than a foot
from the ground, and with a front board to prevent a dog crawling under
it. It should work on hinges, so that it may be lifted up and kept so by
a hook in the wall or other simple contrivance. This enables the kennel
man to get at every crevice and comer in cleaning out, which is very
essential.

The doors must be big enough to admit the attendant, and if the lower
part is made to swing, so as to be self-closing, cold and draughts will be
avoided, and both sufficient light and ventilation can be provided for by
a latticed window in the wall of the dormitory. This window should be
so made as to entirely close, if necessary, in very severe weather.

Beddmg.—For bedding pine shavings are recommended, because the
heat of the dog evaporates some of the turpentine they contain, and
thin is obnoxious to fleas. Pine shavings may be used in the summer,
when dogs are as well without bedding, only that on bare boards they
are apt to wear the hair ofE parts ; but shavingB are' too cold for winter,﻿General Management.

483

and although they may assist in keeping fleas away, these troublesome
intruders are better kept at a distance by constant attention to thorough
cleanliness.

Straw in abundance is, on the whole, the best material for dogs in
health, but hay is an advantage at times to dogs ill and to delicate
puppies.

Cleansing the Kennel— The dogs should be taken out for exercise at a
regular hour, and when out—if that is practicable, which it may not be if
only one man is kept, or the dogs have not an enclosure to exeroise in—
the kennels should be thoroughly brushed out, and in warm dry weather
swilled out thoroughly; for this purpose, if water can be laid on and used
from a hose it is of great advantage, and saves time and labour. It
must, however, be done before feeding—the food preparing the while.
The straw should be forked off the sleeping benches, and these brushed
free from duBt and dirt, and the beds again made up. If they are dogs
for exhibition, and require grooming, let that also be done before the
morning meal is served.

Whitewashing.—At regular intervals, say every month or six weeks,
the walls should be whitewashed. For this purpose whiting is of no
use. Get lumps of unslaked lime, and gradually slaking it, add water
until it is thin enough to apply.

Disinfectants.—The use of disinfectants is as preventives of disease,
and to check its spread when it has entered the kennel.

Whichever is used it should be by itself, not mixed with the limewash.
Disinfectants are numerous. Chloride of lime is a white powder, which
must be kept very dry, as it absorbs moisture rapidly. It should be
mixed with considerable quantities of water when used, and old rags
dipped in the solution and hung up inside the dormitories where there is
a suspicion of an infectious disease will prove a good way of distributing
the free chlorine—which is the disinfecting principle—and purifying the
kennel. A solution of permanganate of potash is an excellent disinfec-
tant. There is, however, nothing better suited to kennel use, and so
convenient, as “ Sanitas,” and of its efficacy I can speak from consider-
able personal experience ; it iB also reasonable in price, and handy, as all
ohemists sell it.

Carbolic acid—even granting the qualities claimed for it as a disinfec-
tant, whioh I do not—is objeotionable, because of the insolubility of the﻿484

British Dogs.

cheaper kinds, so that it never can be equally distributed. It is also a
dangerous thing about kennels, when frequently men ignorant of the
nature of poisons, and consequently careless, have the using of it
therein.

It should always be strongly impressed on persons using disinfectants
that throwing them down in quantities and in certain spots only is mere
waste ; it is the equal, regular, and constant distribution of them spread
over large surfaces that purifies the contaminated air, as well as the
floors, walls, &c.

Before leaving the subject of kennels, it may be well to refer to the
necessary fencing for the yards ; and I would here call attention to the
great improvement in this introduced by Messrs. Boulton and Paul,
Norwich. They make iron fencing specially for kennels of every size and
for every variety of dogs, and whether required light or strong, it is
equally convenient, elegant, and durable.

Feeding.—There is not much to be added on this subject to what has
already been said in treating of dogs for show, page 385.

In an ordinary way, when nothing special is required of the dogs, it is
a great consideration to keep them cheaply, but low priced food is not
often the cheapest. One point in economy is regularity in feeding. Let
certain hours be fixed and adhered to.

It is needless to go through a list of foods There are more dogs now
fed on meat biscuits than any other food; but there are dog biscuits
and dog biscuits; some are rubbish, but there are several makers of
excellent ones.

I find many dogs prefer the biscuits dry, but as change is necessary I
generally give them broken up once a day, soaked with broth and mixed
with boiled cabbage or other green vegetables and any scraps to be used
up; oatmeal, rice, barley meal, are good for a change; Indian corn
meal is too heating, and also too fattening.

It is a mistake to attempt to gauge dogs’ appetites and allow them just
so much j let each one eat as much as he will, but never allow food to
stand over from meal to meal.

Green vegetables of variouB kinds, and roots such as carrots, turnips,
but in small quantities, are wholesome to give at times, and the tops of
young nettles chopped and boiled in the broth are excellent for a change
and are anti-scorbutic in their effects on the system.﻿General Management.

485

Thorough cleanliness in regard to the feeding dishes is an absolute
necessity of health in the kennel.

Fare water should always be accessible to dogs, and it should be so
placed that they cannot soil it. As boxes, such as two or four cham-
pagne boxes nailed together bottom upwards, should be kept in the yard
of the kennel, the water may be kept in vessels hung up against the
wall or railings, so that the dog has to mount the box to get at it. This
will insure its being kept clean.

Exercise.—This I have also noticed in Chapter XXIX. All dogs should
be regularly exercised ; it is cruel to keep a dog on the chain or confined
to house or kennel without relief or change ; and the dog being naturally
an active animal, when his exercise is prevented illness almost surely
follows.

People who keep dogs, if obliged to keep them confined for the most
part, should arrange for them to have at least one hour’s exercise a day.
Taking a pet dog out for a carriage airing is not a substitute.

It is not always easy for men in towns t<j give the dogs they have in
preparation for shows, &o., sufficient exercise. When the development
of hard muscle is necessary, men living in the oountry possess great
advantages in this respect.

When in America, as judge of the International Show, in New York,
May, 1880, I came across a dog exerciser of an ingenious character, which
was new to me, and, as it probably will also be to most readers, I give
an engraving and description of it here.

I found it in use to train bull terriers for fighting, in which brutal and
brutalising contests both wind and muscle are required to be developed
to the uttermost; but I see no reason why it should not be used for that
purpose here, where happily dog fighting no longer exists or is recognised
as a sport, unless by a few who may, at rare intervals, surreptitiously
indulge in their savage and depraved tastes.

For training whippets, terriers, &c., for racing and rabbit coursing,
as well as dogs gradually wanted to be got into hard condition, it will
prove very useful, and a short “turn on the mill ” daily would, I think,
strengthen young ones inclined to be weak in the legs, and it would
certainly tend to prevent wide-spreading, flat, soft feet.

The Dog Exerciser.—The harness used is something like that seen on
our pug dogs, crossing the front of the chest and going round the body﻿486

British Dogs.

behind the fore legs ; a strap is from this attached to the upright in whioh
the spindle works, and another to a hook outside the wheel, so that the
dog is kept in position. Soft, well-kneaded clay, kept well moistened,
is sometimes used instead of tan for the bed on whioh the dog has to
work.

The Exerciser itself is a round platform of wood, about 6ft. in.
diameter, moving on an axle or pivot. In the diagram given, A is the
floor, firmly fastened to which is a circular block of hard wood (B), 18in. in

diameter, and 4in. thick, with a smooth upper surface. Through the
centre runs the axle or pivot (C), which is a bar of iron 4ft. long and an
inch and a half in diameter, with a flange perforated with four holes, and
countersunk to secure it finally to the floor with screws. D is a Becond
piece of hard wood, 15in. in diameter, and 4in. in thickness, securely
fastened to the underside of the platform (E), the surface of which next to
B is also to be made very smooth. The platform should be made of lin.
deal, with a hole in the centre to admit the pivot, and have a rim of
wood (P) round, about 3in., to keep the spent tan-bark from flying off as
the wheel revolves, that being the best material to make the roadway of,
damping it occasionally to keep it from getting dry and dusty. It is﻿General Management.

487

well to have an inner rim of wood (G) round the axle, to keep the pieces of
tan from getting between the pivot and centre hole of the platform. The
dog is fastened by the strap from his harness to the top of the pivot (C) ;
and as he attempts to get away, the platform moves round, and the dog
has all the exercise of covering a great distance. Of course, the surface
between the pivot (C) and platform (E), and between B and D, should be
kept well lubricated with axle-grease or tallow and blacklead. The plat-
form can at times be taken off to clean the friction surfaces, or to set
it aside when not required to be used. Care should be taken that it
works easily.

Grooming wnd Washing.—These matters have already been amply
treated in Chapter XXIX. I will merely add that when it is desired to
get a matted coat into good condition, it helps greatly to well saturate
each piece of matted hair with sweet oil over night, and, in such cases, an
ounce of carbonate of potash should be added to each gallon of water
used in washing the dog next morning, and the mats of tangled hair
should be patiently combed out whilst soaked with water.

The kennel man should, adjoining his boiler house, have a small room
where he can keep in a tidy, orderly manner his chains, collars, leads,
feeding and drinking utensils, brushes, combs, &o., and a few necessary
medicines. Everything about the place should be orderly and regular—not
only a place for everything, and everything in its place, but a time for
everything and everything done at its proper time.

Connected with every kennel of any size, there should be an hospital
and sanitorium where the sick and convalescent may receive the Bpecial
attention they need.

FINIS.﻿﻿11ST DEZ.

PAGE

A.

Aberdeen terrier...... 380, 392

Airedale, or Bingley ter-
rier ................. 377, 392

Appendix ...	..... 454

PAGE

Broken-haired toy terrier ...	446

Bulldog ...............218, 390

of Spain and the Conti-
nent .............. 283

Bull terrier .......... 357, 391

B.

BaBset ................ 83,	190

Beagle ................ 79,	190

Bearded oolley ....... 208,	389

Bedlington terrier ... 318, 391
Bingley, or Airedale ter-
rier ................. 377,	392

Black and tan, or Gordon

setter ........ 113,	191

and tan terrier ... 328, 391
and tan toy terrier . 440, 450
retriever cnrly-coated 163, 192
retrieverwavy-coated 159, 192

spaniel ......... 138,	191

Blenheim spaniel...... 399, 449

Bloodhound............. 50,	190

Blue and tan toy terrier 441, 450
Boarhound, or German

mastiff ....... 280,	390

Breeding .................. 455

objeots of ........... 454

C.

Chinese crested dog ........ 446

edible dog ............ 447

Clumber spaniel .......142,	191

Cocker spaniel ........140,	191

Colley, bearded ...... 208,	389

rough-coated Scotch 195, 389
smooth-coated ... 206, 389
Companion and ornamental

dogs ..............   218

Crested dog, Chinese........	446

Curly - coated blaok re-
triever ...............163,	192

D.

Dachshund ............. 91,	190

Dalmatian ............ 270,	390

Dandie Dinmont terrier 306, 391

Dane, great........... 277,	390

Defenders and watcherB . ...	218

Deerhound, Scotoh ...	28,	189

K K﻿490

Index.

PAGE

Destroyers of vermin: the

terrier ............. 290

Division 1. Dogs used in field

sports .................. 11

II.	Dogs useful to man

in other work than
field sports... 193

III.	House and toy dogs 395

Dog shows and dog judg-
ing ................... 172

shows, history of.......	172

shows, objects and man-
agement of .............. 177

Dogs especially used by man

in his work ........... 195

that find game by scent
and index it for the

gun ................... 103

that hunt game by scent

and kill ................ 50

that hunt game by sight
and kill .................. 13

used in field sports 11, 189
used with gun in quest-
ing and retrieving

game................ 134

useful to man in other

work than	field	
sports		... 193,	389
Dropper					133
Drovers’ dog		... 208,	389
E.		
Edible dog, Chinese			447
Election of judges			181
English setter	... 103,	191

PAGE

English sheep dog..... 208, 389

water spaniel ... 154, 192
white terrier ... 375, 392

Esquimaux ............210,	389

Excellence, standard of, dogs

used in field sports ...	189

dogs useful to man ...	389

house and toy dogs	449

Exhibiting ........... 172

toy dogs	........ 447

F.

Field sports, dogs used in 11, 189
dogs useful	in	other

work than..... 193,	389

Foreign toy dogs.............. 437

Foxhound ................ 62,	190

Fox-terrier ...	... 280, 390

wire-haired ....... 300,	391

G.

German mastiff, or	Boar-

hound......... 280,	390

Gordon, or black	and	tan

setter........113,	191

Great Dane ............. 277,	390

Greyhound ............... 13,	189

Italian ........... 437,	450

Persian.......... 49,	189

Scotch, rough-haired	41,	189

H.

Harrier............... 75,	190

History of dog shows ...	172

House and toy dogs	395﻿Index.

491

		PAGE			PAGE
I.			Norfolk retriever		167,	192
Introduction			2	spaniel		148,	192
Irish setter ...	109,	191	North American wolfdog 210,		389
terrier 		366,	392			
water spaniel	149,	192	O.		
wolfhound	32,	189	Objects of breeding		454
Italian greyhound	437,	450	of dog shows	...	177
			Ornamental dogs		...	218
J ■			Otterhound ...	72,	190
Japanese pug 			442			
Judges, their election ...		181	P.		
Judging by points		184	Persian greyhound	49,	189
dogs, standard of excel-			Pet dogs, training		448
lence for ... 189,	389,	449	Pointer			117,	191
K.			Spanish			117
			Points, judging by	...	184
King Charles spaniel ...	402,	449	of dogs used in	field	
L.			sports, scale of	...	189
			of dogs useful to man ...		389
Landseer Newfoundland	...	269	of house and toy dogs ...		449
Liver-coloured retriever 169,		192	Pomeranian		420,	449
Long-haired toy terrier 442,		450	Poodle 		423,	449
Lurcher		43,	189	Pug			406,	449
M.			Japanese				442
Maltese terrier 		428,	449	Q.		
Management of dog shows ...		177	Questing and retrieving game,		
of dogs			...	454	dogs used in	...	134
Mastiff		239,	390			
German,	or	boar-			E.		
hound	280,	390	Bearing		...	467
Thibet 		275,	390	Eetrievers 		...	157
			black curly-coated	163,	192
N.			black wavy-coated 159,		192
Newfoundland 		260,	390	liver-coloured	169,	192
Landseer			• ••	269	Norfolk		167,	192﻿492

Index.

	TAGE			PAGE
Retrievers, Russian ... 170,	192	Snap dog, or whippet ...	45,	189
Retrieving game, dogs used		Spaniels				134
in			134	Blenheim			399,	449
Rough-coated colley ... 195,	389	black 		138,	191
Rough-haired Scotch grey-		cocker ...	140,	191
hound	 41,	189	Clumber			142,	191
Russian retriever	... 170,	192	English water	154,	192
		Irish water 		149,	192
S.		King Charles	402,	449
		pointer ...		117
St. Bernard 	 248,	390	Norfolk			149,	192
Scale of points—see Stand-		Sussex 		145,	192
ard of Excellence		toy			395
Scent, dogs that hunt by ...	50	Spanish bulldogs		...	283
dogs that fine game by,		Standard of Excellence:		
' and index it 		103	Aberdeen terrier ...		392
Schweisshund			101	Airedale terrier ...		392
Scotch colley		195,	389	Basset ...		190
deerhound 	 28,	189	Beagle 			190
greyhound, rough-		Bearded colley		381
haired	...	41,	189	Bedlington terrier	...	399
terrier ...	... 362,	391	Black and tan, or Gordon		
Setter, English 	 103,	191	setter				191
Gordon, or black and		Black spaniel		191
tan 	113,	191	Black and tan terrier ...		391
Irish 	109,	191	Black curly - coated	re-	
Sheep-dog, English .. 208,	389	triever			...	192
Showing			382	Black and tan toy terrier		450
Shows, objects and manage-		Black wavy - coated	re-	
ment of dog 		177	triever				192
history of dog	172	Blenheim spaniel ...		449
Siberian wolfhound ...	48,	189	Bloodhound 		...	190
Sight, dogs that hunt by ...	13	Blue and tan toy terrier		450
Skye terrier ...	... 334,	391	Boarhound, or German		
Sleigh dogs 	210,	389	mastiff				390
Smooth-coated colley ... 206,	389	Black and tan terrier		291﻿Index.

493

Standard of Excellence—con-
tinued.

Bob-tailed sheep dog ...

Bulldog................

Bull terrier ...

Clumber spaniel .......

Cocker spaniel ........

Colley, bearded .......

Colley, rough-coated ...

Colley, smooth ........

Curly-coated retriever...

Dachshund .........

Dalmatian .............

Dandie Dinmont terrier
Deerhound, Scotch

English setter ........

English water spaniel...
English white terrier ...

Esquimaux dog .........

Foxhound ..............

Fox terrier ...........

Fox terrier, wire-haired
German mastiff, or boar-

hound ..............

Gordon, or black and tan

setter .............

Great Dane.............

Greyhound .............

Greyhound, Italian
Greyhound, Persian ...
Greyhound, rough Scotch

Harrier................

Irish setter ..........

Irish terrier..........

Irish water spaniel
Irish wolfhound .......

pa6e

Standard of Excellence—con-
tinued.

Italian greyhound	...	450
Japanese and Chinese		
dogs 		...	450
King Charles spaniel	...	449
Liver-coloured retriever		192
Long-haired toy terrier		450
Lurcher		...	189
Maltese terrier	...	449
Mastiff			390
Mastiff, German,	or	
boarhound	...	390
Mastiff, Thibet ...	...	390
Newfoundland	...	390
Norfolk retriever...	...	192
Norfolk spaniel ...		192
North American wolf-		
dog 			389
Otterhound 			190
Persian greyhound	...	189
Pointer		...	191
Pomeranian		...	449
Poodle 		...	449
Pug			...	449
Retriever, liver-coloured		192
black wavy-coated	...	192
Retriever, curly-coated		192
Retriever, Norfolk	...	192
Retriever, Russian		192
Rough-coated colley	...	389
Rough Sootch grey-		
hound			...	189
Russian retriever	...	192
St. Bernard			390
Scotch deerhound		189

PAGE

389

390

391

191

191

389

389

389

192

190

390

391

189

191

192

392

389

190

390

391

390

191

390

189

450

189

189

190

191

392

192

189﻿494

Index.

Standard of Excellence—con-
tinued.

■Scotch rough greyhound
Scotch terrier

Setter, English ........

Setter, Irish

Sheep-dog .........

Siberian wolfhound

Skye terrier ...........

Smooth colley ..........

Spaniel, Blenheim

Spaniel, black .........

Spaniel, Clumber ...

Spaniel, cocker ........

Spaniel, English water
Spaniel, Irish water
Spaniel, King Charles

Spaniel, Norfolk .......

Spaniel, Sussex ........

Terrier, Aberdeen

Terrier, Airedale.......

Terrier, black and tan
Terrier, Bedlington

Terrier, bull...........

Terrier, Dandie Dinmont
Terrier, English white

Terrier, fox ...........

Terrier, fox, wire-haired

Terrier, Irish .........

Terrier, Maltese .......

Terrier, Sootch

Terrier, Skye ..........

Terrier, toy, long-haired
Terrier, toy, white
Terrier, Yorkshire
Thibet mastiff .........

l*A(i K

Standard of Excellence—con-
tinued.

Truffle dog ............. 381)

Water spaniel, English 192
Water spaniel, Irish ...	192

Wavy - coated retriever,

liver and black.......	192

Whippet .................. 189

White English terrier ...	392

White toy terrier.......	450

Wire-haired fox terrier 391
Wolf dog, North Ameri-
can ................. 389

Wolfhound, Irish ...	189

Wolfhound, Siberian ...	189

Yorkshire terrier.......	449

Sussex spaniel	...	192

T.

Terrier, Aberdeen	...	380,	392

Airedale, or Bingley ...	377

black and tan ... 328, 391
blue and tan	...	441,	450

broken-haired ......... 446

black and tan toy 440, 450

Bedlington ......... 318,	391

bull ............... 357,	391

Dandie Dinmont ... 306, 391

Irish	  366,	392

fox ................ 280,	390

fox, wire-haired ... 300, 391
long-haired toy ... 442, 450

Maltese............. 428,	449

Scotch ............. 362,	391

Skye ...	...	334,	391

white toy	...	442,	450

PAGE

189

391

191

191

389

189

391

389

449

191

191

191

192

192

449

192

192

392

392

391

391

39x

391

391

390

391

392

449

391

391

450

450

449

390﻿Index.

495

Terrier, white English...	375,	PAGE  392
wire-haired fox	300,	391
Yorkshire	432,	449
Thibet mastiff 		275,	390
Toy dogs which are distinct		
varieties ...	...	395
dogs which are diminu-		
tives			437
dogs, exhibiting ...		447
and house dogs		395
Spaniels		395
Training pet dogs	...	448
Truffle dogs ...	217,	389

PAGE

w

Watchers and defenders ...	218

Water spaniel, English 154, 192

Irish ..............149,	192

Wavy-coated black re-
triever ............... 159,	192

White English terrier ... 375, 392

White toy terrier...... 442, 450

Whippet, or snap dog ...	4£>,	189

Wire-haired fox terrier 300, 391
Wolfdog,North American 210, 389
Wolfhound, Irish ...	32, 189

Siberian	48,	189

V.

Y.

Vermin destroyers, the terrier 290

Yorkshire terrier..... 432, 449﻿﻿ADVERTISEMENTS.

CHAMBERLIN’S

MEAT BISCUITS	FOR DOGS

Are the lest ever introduced, see the following Analysis:

County Analyst’s Office and Laboratory,

London Street, Norwich, June 24th, 1879.
CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS of a Sample of Meat Biscuits for Dogs, from Mr.
JAMES CHAMBERLIN, Post Office Street, Norwich. No. 151 N.

Per cent.

Moisture....................................... 10'49

Fibrine and Albumen, or flesh and muscle forming substances. 19'05

Carbonaceous or fat and beat giving substances. 68'21

Phosphates...................................... 1‘12

Potash and other Mineral matters................ 1*13

---lOO'OO

(Signed! FRANCIS SIJTTON.

elements are well balanced, so as t
of worthless or useless material.

In this important respect they aTe BY FAR THE BEST DOG FOOD I have ever
examined, and I have the greatest confidence in recommending them.

(Signed! FRANCIS SUTTON, F.C.S., F.I.C., London & Berlin.

Public Analyst to the County of Norfolk, Chemist to the Norfolk Chamber of
Agriculture, Author of “Handbook of Volumetric Analysis,” &c., &c.

PRICJE 18s. per Cwt., BAG- INCLUDED.

Special Quotations for 5 cwt. and 1 ton lots.

CHAMBERLIN'S

GRANULATED DOG FOOD.

Granulat
id Yard ]

Mastiffs, Hounds,
iats free from all

ouse and Yard Hogs. It keeps the dogs in perfect health, and their coats free from al
lpleasant smells. It is more nourishing than oatmeal, and very grateful to the palate
igs eat it with avidity.

The Granulated Dog Food is invaluable for bitches just whelped, and also for the
young puppies, who thrive wonderfully upon it. It is constantly supplied to eminent
breeders and judges of dogs.

an’s Journal,
immend

il 12th, 1879). For diminutive and delicate breeds I cannot do better than recommend
mberlin’s ‘ Granulated Dog Food,’ which possesses the triple merit oi being highly
■itious, grateful to the palate of the moBt seedy young canis, and entirely devoid of
ble in its preparation. In fact, Mr. Chamberlin’B Food is so invaluable in many other
ways with sick, delicate, or dainty dogs, that thi-’ " ’------—*■ ~—	—,J

lose no time in doing so."
Cinq Mars (in tb

b Food is so invaluable in many other
ho have not yet given it a trial should

nq Mars (in“the Fancier's Chronicle, June 6th, 1879) says, “I have just tried
Ohamberlin’s Granulated Dog Food; it is most handy stuff, very useful for bitches just
pupped, to give them warmth, and young puppies relish it.’’

Twopence per Packet; Twelve Dozen Packets (including box),
£1 6s.; Three Dozen, 6s. 6d.

JAMES CHA^IIVEIBEIE^LIIsr,

DOG FOOD WAREHOUSE,

POST OFFICE STREET, NORWICH.﻿ADVERTISEMENTS.

fi

H

◄

PL.

H

O

<

H

tf

ti

o

o

W S

P

M

p

o

SI

«

The Queen’s Huntsman writeB :

“ The Royal Kennels, December 1, 1877.

“ Dear Sir,—I have now decided upon using your Buffalo Meat
Biscuits in the Royal Kennels. By long experience, covering a period of
twenty years, during which time all varieties of food have been submitted
to me, I am enabled to judge of what is most necessary for the canine
race. The opportunities you have given me of seeing and testing all the
articles used in the manufacture of your Buffalo Meat Biscuits, have con-
vinced me that a more nourishing and suitable food for dogs has not yet
been invented, combining, as they do, all the qualities of a moBt perfect
food. It is with greatest confidence I can recommend them to all who
desire to see their dogs in good health and condition.

“ Tours truly,

“ Mr. W. G. Clarke.”	“ FRANK GOODALL.

In addition to the many hundreds of testimonials I have received
speaking highly of my biscuits, the prizes for the finest condition dogs at
the Shrewsbury Field Trials for three years in succession have been won
by dogs fed wholly on the Buffalo Meat Biscuits.

Directions for Use.—Two biscuits per day for dogs of 281bs. weight or
under, for others feed in proportion.

CLARKE’S PREPARED POULTRY FOOD,

20s. per cwt., carriage paid.

An excellent egg-producer. This food contains meat, and is nutritive
in a high degree. Mixed with hot water and given warm in the morning,
will be found of great advantage.

Granulated Meat for Pheasants, Turkeys, &c.,

25s. per owt.; carriage paid.

A half-pint given daily to every 20 pheasants, turkeys, &o., will be
found invaluable in cold and frosty weather.

MANUFACTORY

“ANCHOR” PATENT BISCUIT WORKS,

LIMEHOUSE, LONDON, E.﻿ADVERTISEMENTS.

If your DOGS are ILL, procure from your Chemist

SPRATTS PATENT

DOG MEDICINES.

CURE FOR DISTEMPER IN DOGS. In Boxes, price 2s. 6d.; post
free, 2s. 8d.

CURE FOR MANGE IN DOGS. In Bottles, price Is., and in Gallon
Jars, for large Kennels, 7s. 6d.

CURE FOR WORMS IN DOGS. Is. per Box, post free, Is. 2d.
PURGING PILLS FOR DOGS, Price Is., post free, Is. 2d.
ALTERATIVE COOLING POWDERS. Price Is., post free, Is. 2d.;
Boxes for large Kennels, 20s.

CURE FOR RHEUMATISM, LUMBAGO, AND CHEST FOUNDER,
OR KENNEL LAMENESS. Price Is., post free, Is. 2d.; large Boxes, 5s.

CURE FOR JAUNDICE OR YELLOWS. Price Is., post free,
Is. 2d.; large Boxes, 5s.

TONIC CONDITION PILLS. Price Is., post free, Is. 2d.; Boxes
for large Kennels, 5s.

COUGH PILLS. Price Is. per Box ; post free, Is. 2d.; large Boxes,
5s.

LINIMENT FOR SPRAINS, &o. Price Is. and 5s. per Bottle.
CURE FOR CANKER OF THE EAR. Price Is.; larger Bottles, 5s.
STIMULANT FOR THE GROWTH OF HAIR. Price Is. per Bottle.
THE KENNEL MEDICINE CHEST, PRICE 25s.,
Contains all the above remedies, and, in addition, Lancets, Seton Needle,
Scissors, dfc.

SPRATTS PATENT DOG SOAP,

Price Qd. 'per Tablet.

Invaluable to dog owners, being entirely free from poison. It is most
effective in destroying parasites, and is the only soap that should be
used for preparing dogs for exhibition, as it leaves the coat smooth and
glossy.	______________

If your DOGS are WELL, keep them so by feeding on

SPRATTS PATENT

MEAT “FIBRINE” DOG CARES,

22s. per cwt., carriage paid.

As supplied to Paris Dog Show, 1878, by order of the French Govern-
ment; English Kennel Club’s great shows; Westminster Kennel Club’s
Bench Show, New York; and all the principal exhibitions in the United
Kingdom and abroad. _________

SPRATTS PATENT,

BERMONDSEY, LONDON, i 36, RUE CAUMARTIN, PARIS.

N.B.—Our goods can be obtained in all Continental cities.﻿ADVERTISEMENTS.

In paper, price u., by post, ij. id.; in cloth gilt, 2s.,
by post, 2s. 2d.

THE DISEASES OF DOGS:

Their Pathology, Diagnosis, and Treatment; to which is added a

BREAKING AND TRAINING

Concise Directions for the proper Education, both for the Field and as
Companions, of Retrievers, Pointers, Setters, Spaniels, Terriers, &c.

Important Verbatim Reprint of the earliest book on DogB.

In boards, price 2s. 6d.; by post, 2s. 8d.

OF ENGLISHE DOGGES:

The diuersities, the names, the natures, and the properties. A Short
Treatise written in latine by Iohannes Caius of late memorie, Doctor ot
Phisicke in the Uniuersitie of Cambridge. And newly drawne into
Englishe by Abraham Fleming, Student. Natura etiam in brutis vim
ostendit suam. Seene and allowed. Imprinted at London by Rychard
Johnes, and are to be solde ouer against S. Sepulchres Church without
Newgate. 1576.

complete Dictionary of Canine Materia Medica.
For the use of Amateurs.

By HUGH DALZIEL.

In cloth gilt, 5.L ; by post, $s. 4,d.

BEING

By “PATHFINDER.”

LONDON: “THE BAZAAR” OFFICE, 170, STRAND, W.C.﻿C\

ATALOGUE

New and Practical

BOOKS.

LONDON: 170, STRAND, W.C.

October, 1880.﻿CATALOGUE.

ANIMALS, BIRDS, &c.

Breaking and Training Dogs:

Being Concise Directions for the proper Education, both for the Field and as Com-
panions, of Retrievers, Pointers, Setters, Spaniels, Terriers, &o.

In cloth gilt, 5s., by post, 5s. 4d.

Diseases of Dogs:

Their Pathology, Diagnosis, and Treatment; to which is added a complete
Dictionary of Canine Materia Medica. For the Use of Amateurs, By Hugh

Dalzie:

el.

In paper, price Is., by post Is. Id.; in cloth gilt 2s„ by post 2s. 2d.

British Dogs:

Their Varieties, History. Characterise
tion. Illustrated with Portraits of t
Dalziel (“Corsincon," Author of "The
Horses," &c.), assisted by Eminent Fancier
Bevelled boards, extra gilt, gilt edg<

cs, Breeding, Management, and Exhibi-
he Chief Dogs of the Day. By Huoh
le Diseases of Doge," “ The Diseases of

ges, price 10s., by poBt, 10s. Gd.

Dogs Used in Field Sports:

Their History, Varieties, Characteristics, &c. With nineteen full page Portraits
of celebrated Dogs of the Day. (Forming Division I. of “ British Dogs")

Price 3s., by post, 3s. 3d.

Dogs Useful to Man

In other Work than Field Sports. Their History, Varieties, Characteristics, &c.
With twenty-four full Ipage Portraits of Leading Dogs of the Day. (Forming
Division II. of “ British Dogs.”)

Price 3s„ by post, 3s. 3d.

House and Toy Dogs :

Their History, Varieties, Characteristics, &c, Also the General Management of
Dogs, and Breeding and Rearing. Illustrated with nine Portraits of Celebrated
Dogs of the Day. (FormingDivision III. of “ British Dogs.”)

Price 2s., by post, 2s. 2d.

Of Englishe Dogges:

Uniuersitie of Cambridge. And newly drawi
Student. Natura etiam in brutis vim ostendit suam. Seene a:
at London by Rychard Johnes, and are to bi
Church without in ewi

i Engl
. See

les, and are to be soldo
wgate. 1576. Reprinted verbatim.

In boards, price 2s. 6d., by post, 2s. 8d.

Diseases of Horses:

Their Pathology, Diagnosis, and Treatment; to which is added a complete
Dictionary of Equine Materia Medica. For the Use of Amateurs. By Hugh
Dalziel.

In paper, price Is. 6d., by post. Is. 8d.

Practical Dairy Farming:

A short Treatise on the Profitable Management of a Dairy Farm.
By G. Seawabd Witcombe.

In paper, price Is. 6d., by post, is. 7d.

Illustrated.

Book of the Goat:

-Containing Practical Directions for the Management of the Milch Goat in Health
And Disease. Illustrated. By Stephen Holmes.

Cheap edition, in paper, price Is., by post. Is. Id.﻿Practical Handbooks.—Handbooks on Animals, Birds, <5r’c. (continued).

Stock Keeping for Amateurs:

Designed for the nee of Young Farmers and Amateurs. By W. H. Ablett (Author
of “Farming for Pleasure and Profit,” “Arboriculture for Amateurs,” "English
Trees and Tree Planting").

Post 8vo„ cloth gilt, price 5s., hy post, 6s. 4d.

Rabbits for Prizes and Profit:

variety, with Instructions for Breeding good s]

Charles Rayson. Edited by Leonard U. Gii

In cloth gilt, price 2s. 6d., by post, 2s. 9d.

General Management of Rabbits:

Including Hutches, Breeding, Feeding, Diseases and their Treatment, Rabbit
Coverts, &c. Fully illustrated. (Forming Part I. of “ Babbitt for Prizes and
Profit:’)

In paper, price ls„ by post, is. Id.

Exhibition Rabbits:

Being Descriptions of all Varieties of Fancy Rabbits, their Points of Excellence,
and how to obtain them. Illustrated. (Forming Part II. of “Babbits for Prizes
and Profit:’)

In paper, price Is., by post, Is. id.

The Book of the Rabbit :

A	'	- -	.

thi

every ot

specially prepared for this work, and numerous wood engravingB. By Various
Breeders and Exhibitors. Edited by Leonard U. Gill, (Editor of " Rabbits for

es i
iod

our drawings
By Various

Prizes and Profit”).

athly

In monthly parts (commenced in August), price Is., by post, Is. Id.

Ferrets and Ferreting:

Containing Instructions for the Breeding, Management, and Working of Ferrets
In paper, price 6d., hy post, 7d.

Fancy Mice:

Their Varieties, Management, and Breeding. Illustrated.

In paper, price 6d„ by post, 6Jd.

Foreign Cage Birds:

Containing Full Directions for Successfully Breeding, Rearing, and Managing the
various Beautiful Cage Birds imported into this country. Beautifully Illustrated.
By C. W. Gedney.

In cloth gilt, in two vols., price 8s. 6d., hy post, 9s.; in extra cloth gilt, gilt edges, in one
vol., price 9s. 6d., by poBt, 9s. lOd.

Parrakeets, Parrots, Cockatoos, Lories, & Macaws:

Their Varieties, Breeding and Management. (Forming Vol. I. of “Foreign Cage
Birds.")

In cloth gilt, price Ss. 6d., by post, 8s. 9d.

Waxbills, Finches, Weavers, Orioles, and other

small Foreign Aviary Birds:

Their Varieties, Breeding, and Management. Beautifully illustrated. (Forming
Vol. II. of “Foreign Cage Birds.")

in cloth gilt, price 5s., by post, 5s. 4d.

Canary Book:

Containing Full Dlrectli
Canaries and Canary Hull
their points and breeding;
trated. By Robert L. Wallace.

In cloth gilt, price 5s., by post 5s. 4d.﻿Practical Handbooks, Published at 17b, Strand, W.C.

General Management of Canaries:

Including Cages and Cage Making, Breeding, Managing, Mule Breeding, Diseases
and their Treatment, Moulting, Hats and Mice, &c. Illustrated. (Forming Part I,
of the •' Canary Booh.")

In paper, price 2s., by post, 2s. 2d.

Exhibition Canaries:

{Forming

In paper, price 2b(| by post, 2b. 2d.

Fancy Pigeons:

bor

In

monthly parts (commenced in May)» price 0d.

. IjYELL.

, by post,

0id.

Poultry for Prizes and Profit:

Contains Breeding Poultry for Prizes, Exhibition Poultry, and Management ol the
Poultry Yard. Handsomely Illustrated. By James Loxg.

In cloth gilt, price 2s. 6d., by post, 2s. 9d.

Breeding Poultry for Prizes:

Containing full instructions for Mating Poultry to obtain the bast results in each
breed. Illustrated. (Formino Part I. of “Poultry for Prizes and Profit.’’)

Price 6d., by post, 64d.

Exhibition Poultry ;

Their Varieties, Characteristics, and Points of Excellence. Illustrated. (Forming
Part II. of “ Poultry for Prizes and Pro-fit.'’)

Price Is., by post, Is. Id.

d Buns, General
Farming, &c.

Management of the Poultry Yard:

Including Hatching of Eggs, Rearing and Feeding, Houses anc
Management, Diseases and their Treatment, Fattening, Poultry
Illustrated. (Forming Part III. of " Poultry for Prizes and Profit.’’)

In paper, price Is., by post, Is. Id.

Duehs and Geese:

Their Characteristics, Points, and Management. By Various Breeders.
Splendidly illustrated.

In paper, price Is. 6d., by poBt, Is. 7d.

Practical Bee-heeping:

agement of the

HE3HIRE.

Bee-keeping for Amateurs:

Being a Short Treatise on Apiculture on Humane and Successful Principle By
Thomas Addet (the Lincolnshire Apiarian).

Now ready, price 6d., by post, 6id.


PRACTICAL MECHANICS.

Patents, Trade Marks, and Designs:﻿Practical Handbooks, Published at 170, Strand, W.C.

POPULAR NATURAL HISTORY.

Practical Taxidermy:

A Manual of Instruction to the Amateur in Collecting, Preserving, and Setting-up
Natural History Specimens of all kinds. Illustrated. By Montagu Browne.
In cloth gilt, price Ss. 6d., by post, 3s. 9d.

Collecting Butterflies and Moths:

Being Directions for Capturing, Hilling, and Preserving Lepidoptera and their
Larva. Illustrated. Reprinted, with additions, from “Practical Taxidermy.”
By Montagu Browne (Author of “ Practical Taxidermy ”).

In 1 aper, price Is., by post 1b, Id.

Popular British Fungi:

Containing Descriptions and Histories of the Principal Fungi, both Edible and
Poisonous, of our Country. Illustrated. By James Britten, F.L.S., &c.

In cloth gilt, prioe 3s. 6d., by post, 3s. 9d.

British Marine Algce:

Being a Popular Account of the Seaweeds of Great Britain, their Collection
and Preservation. Magnificently illustrated with 205 engravings. By W. H.
Grattan.

In cloth gilt, price 5s. 6d..’by post, 5s. lOd.

Zoological Notes:

of “ The Puzzle of Life, and How
Physical History of the Earth

F.B.G.S. (Author
Chapters from the

[In the press.


GUIDES TO GARDENING.

The Hardy Fruit Book (Vol. I.):

Consisting of a Series of Exhaustive Treatises on various Hardy Fruits grown
in this country; giving the History, the most desirable Sorts, and the best Methods

the Apple, the Pear, Peach and Nectarine, mei
the Apricot, the Plum, &c.

In cloth gilt, price 5s„ by post, 5s. 5d.

May also be had in partB as follow:

The Apple:

Its History, Varieties, Cultivation, Pruning, Training, Cropping, &c.

In paper, price Is., by post, Is. Id.

The Pear:

Its History, Varieties, Cultivation, Pruning, Training, Cropping, &c.

In paper, price Is. 6d., by post, Is. 7d.

The Peach and Nectarine:

Their History, Varieties, Cultivation, PruDing, Training, Cropping, &c.
In paper, price Is. 6d., by post, Is. 7<L﻿Practical Handbooks.—Guides to Gardening (continued).

The Apricot:

Its History, Varieties, Cultivation, Pruning, Training, Cropping, Diseases, &o.
In paper, price Is., by post Is. Id.

The Plum:

Its History, Varieties, Cultivation, Pruning, Training, Cropping, &c.

In paper, price Is., by post, Is. id.

Orchids for Amateurs:

Britten, fm.o, (oi tne Bntien Museum), ana
In cloth gilt, price 7s. 6d., by post, 7b. IOcL

Rose Growing for Amateurs:

Being Practical Instructions for the successful Culture of RoseB, with selections
of the best varieties adapted to the requirements of the Amateur in Town or
Country. By W. D. Prior.

In paper, price Is. 6d., by post, Is. 8d.

Bulbs and Bulb Culture (Vol, I.):

Being Descriptions, both historic »1 and botanical, of the principal Bulbs and
Bulbous Plants grown in this country, and their chief Varieties; with full and
practical instructions for their successful Cultivation, both in and out of doors.
Illustrated. By D. T. Fish. Vol. I. includes Parts I. and II., as named below.

;ln cloth gilt, price 2s. 6d., by post, 2s. 9d.

The Snowdrop, Bulboeodium, Sternbergia, Crocus,

Colchicum, Tulip, and Hyacinth:

The best sorts, and their cultivation, indoors, under glass, and in the open border.
Illustrated. (Forming^ Part I. of “ Bulbs and Bulb Culture,’’)

.	a n ......	.

n paper, price is., by post. Is. Id.

The Anemone or Wind Flower, the Narcissus, the

Lily:

The best sorts, and their cultivation, indoors, under glass, and in the open border.
Illustrated. (Forming Part II. of “Bulbs and Bulb Culture")

In paper, price Is., by post, Is. 2d.

The Gladiolus or Corn Flag, Lachenalia, Cycla-
men, Ranunculus, and Scilla or Squill (Star
Hyacinth):

The best sorts
Illustrated.

ts, and their cultivation, indoors, under gloss, and in the open border.
(Forming Part III. of “ Bulbs and Bulb Culture")

[In paper, price Is., by post. Is. lid.

Vine Culture for Amateurs:

Amateurs,” &c.).

In paper, price Is., by post, Is. Id.

Pruning, Grafting, and Budding Fruit Trees:

Illustrated with ninety-three Diagrams. By D. T. Fish.

In paper, price Is., by post. Is. Id.

Villa Gardening:

Being plain instructions for the Proper Laying-out, Planting, and Management
of Small Gardens; with lists of Trees. Shrubs, and Plants most suitable, and
thirteen Designs for small gardens. By W. J. May.

Cheap edition, in paper, price 1b„ by post, Is. Id.﻿Practical Handbooks, Published at 170, Strand, W.C.

Rose Budding:

Containing: fall Instructions for the BaccesBful performance of thin Interesting
operation. Illustrated. By D. T. Fish (Author of “ Bulbs and Bulb Culture,”
“The Hardy Fruit Book," “ Pruning:, Grafting, and Budding Fruit Trees," &c.).

,	In paper, price 6d., by post, 7cL

Greenhouse Management for Amateurs:

Descriptions of the best Greenhouses and Frames, with Instructions for Building
them; Particulars of the various Methods of Heating: lists of the most suitable
plants, with general and special cultural directions; and all necessary information
for the Guidance of the Amateur. Illustrated. By W. J. May (Author of “ Vine
Culture for Amateurs," “ Cucumber Culture for Amateurs," &c.).

In cloth gilt, price 3s. 6d„ by post, 3s. 9d.

Arboriculture for Amateurs:

Being Instructions for the Planting and Cultivation of Trees for Ornament
or Use, and selections and descriptions of those suited to special requirements os to
Soil, Situation, &c. By William H. Ablett (Author of “English Trees and
Tree Planting,” Sic.).

In cloth gilt, price 2s. 6d., by post, 2s. 8d.

Cucumber Culture for Amateurs:

Including also Melons, Vegetable Marrows, and Gourds. Dlustrated. By W. J.
May (Author of “ Vine Culture for Amateurs," “ Greenhouse Management for
Amateurs”).

In paper, price Is., by post, Is. Id.

-------------------------

SPORTS AND PASTIMES.

Country Pocket Book and Diary {1881):

oetage

[Bead;

y in December.

Bicyclist’s Pocket Book and Diary (1880-81) ;

For Reference and Rei

gistration
Price, re

Full of facts and forms of interest to Bicyclists.
Price, roan, 2s. 6d„ postage, 2d.

Bicycles and Tricycles of the Year 1880:

Bicycles and Tricycles. Designed also to assist intending
of a machine. Illustrated. By Harry Hewitt Griffin.

In paper, price Is., by ipost, Is. Id.

The Bicyclist’s Guide to

Shewing at
By Bobeb

Machines and Makers:

ery machine in the market.

Practical Trapping:

Being some Papers on Traps and Trapping for Vermin, with a chapter on general
bird trapping and snaring. By W. Carnegie (“ Moorman.”)

Price Is., by post, Is. Id.

Practical Fisherman:

Dealing with the Natural History, the Legendary Lore, and the Capture of
British Freshwater Fish. Beautifully illustrated.

In parts (commenced December, 1879, will be completed in about sixteen parts), in paper,
price 6d. each, by post, 61d.﻿Practical Handbooks.—Sports and Pastimes (continued).

Notes on Game and Game Shooting:

Miscellaneous observations on Birds and Animals, and on the Snort they afford

In cloth gilt, 490 pp., price 7s. 6d., by post 7s. lOd.

Practical Boat Sailing for Amateurs:

Containing Particulars of the most Suitable Sailing Boats and Tachts for Amateurs,
and Instructions for their Proper Handling, Ac. Illustrated with numerous Dia-
grams. By G. Christopher Davies (Author of "The Swan and her Crew,” Ac.).
In cloth gilt, price 5s., by post 5s. 3d.

Practical Photography:

Being the Science and Art of Photography, Developed for Amateurs and Beginners,
Illustrated, By O. E. Wheeler.

In cloth gilt, price 3s. 6d, by post, 3s. 9d.

Wet Collodion Process:

The Art of Photography by this process, developed for Amateurs and Beginners.
(Being Part I. of “ Practical Photography.")

In paper, price Is., by post. Is. 2d.

Dry Plate Photography ;

The Art of Photography by this Process developed for Amateurs and Beginners*
(Being Part II. of “Practical Photography")

In paper, price Is., by post, Is. 2d.

The Photographer’s Pocket Book:

. Compiled by 0. E Wheeler

.ther 3s. 6d.; by post, 2d. extra.

Leather Work Book:

Containing Pull Instructions for Making and Ornamenting articles so as
successfully imitate Carved Oak ; specially written for the use of Amateurs.
Rosa Bauqhan. Illustrated.

In cloth gilt, price 2s. 6d., by post, 2s. 9d.

to

By

Cards and Card Tricks:

Containing a brief History of Playing Cards : Full Instructions, with Illustrated
Hands, for playing nearly all known games of chance or skill, from Whist to
Napoleon and Patience, and directions for performing a number of amusing Trioks.
Illustrated. By H. E. Heather.

In doth gilt, price 5s„ by post, 5s. 4d.

Sleight of Hand:

Being Minute Instructions by the Aid of which, with proper practice, the Neatest
and most Intricate Tricks of Legerdemain can be successfully performed. Illus-
trated. By Edwin Sachs.

In cloth gilt, price 5s., by post, 6s. 4d.

Drawing Room Magic:

Being Conjuring Tricks suited to Beginners, and for display in drawing rooms.
Illustrated. (Forming Part I. of Sleight of Hand.”)

In paper, price 2s., by post, 2s. 2d.

Grand or Stage Magic:

Being Instructions for the Performance of more intricate and showy conjuring
tricks, and suited to publio display. Illustrated. (Forming Part II. of " Sleight of
Hand")

In paper, price 2s„ by post, 2s. 2d.

Artistic Amusements:

Being Instructions for a variety of Art Work for Home Employment, and Sugges-
tions for a number of Novel and Saleable Articles for Fancy Bazaars. Illustrated.
Contents are given in Series I. and II.

In cloth gilt, price 2s. 6d„ by post, 2s. 8d.﻿Practical Handbooks, Published at 170, Strand, W.C.

Series I. of “Artistic Amusements ”:

Colouring Photographs, Imitation Stained Glass, Decalcomanie, Queen Shell Work,
Painting on China, Japanese Lacquer Work, Stencilling.

In paper, price Is., by post, Is. Id.

Series II. of “ Artistic Amusements”:

Painting Magic Lantern Slides, Menu and Guest Cards, Spatter Work, Picture
and Scrap Screens, Frosted Silver Work, Pioture Cleaning and Restoring, Illumi-
nating and Symbolical Colouring.

In paper, price Is., by post, Is. Id.

MISCELLANEO US.

English Pottery and Porcelain:

A Manual for Collectors. Being a Concise Account of the Developement of the
Potter’s Art in England. Profusely Illustrated with Marks, Monograms, and
Engravings of characteristic Specimens. New Edition.

In cloth gilt, price 3s. 6d., by post, 3s. 8d.

English Pottery:

Giving the History of the most famous and valued descriptions of English Pottery,
with illustrations of specimens, marks, and monograms, &o. (Forming Part I. of
“ English Pottery and Porcelain.”)

In paper, price is. 6d., by post, Is. 7d.

English Porcelain:

Giving the History of the most famous and valued descriptions of English Porcelain,
with illustrations of specimens, marks, and monograms, &c. [Forming Part II. of
“English Pottery and Porcelain.”)

In paper, price Is. 6d., by post. Is. 7d.

English, Scotch, and Irish Coins:

A Manual for Collectors; being a History and Description of the Coinage of
Great Britain, from the Earliest Ages to the Present Time, with Tables of
Approximate Values of Good Specimens. Profusely Illustrated.

In cloth gilt, price 5s„ by post, 5s. 4d.

Value of British Coins:

A Manual for Buyers, Sellers, and Exchangers, a
of good Specimens of English and Scotch Coins.

In paper, price Is., by post, Is. Id.

as giving the Approximate Values

Character Indicated by Handwriting;

With Illustrations in support of the Theories advanced, taken from Autograph
Letters of Statesmen, Lawyers, Soldiers, Ecclesiastics, Authors, Poets, Musicians,
Actors, and other persons. By R. Baughan.

In cloth gilt, price 2s. 6d., by post 2s. 9d.

Winter Havens in the Sunny South:

A complete Handbook to the Riviera, with a notice of the new station, Alassio,
Splendidly Illustrated. By Rosa Baughan (Author of “ Indications of Character
in Handwriting," “ The Northern Watering Places of France.”)

In cloth gilt, price 2s. 6d„ by post, 2s. 8d.

Seaside Watering Places:

Being a Guide to Persons in Search of a Suitable Place in which to Spend their
Holidays, on the English and Welsh Coasts. New and Revised Edition, with
Descriptions of over 130 Places.

In paper, price 2s„ by post, 2s. 3d.﻿Practical Handbooks.—Manuals on Practical Mechanics {continued).

Practical Architecture:

As applied to Farm Buildings of ever; description (Cow, Cattle and Calf Houses,
Stables, Piggeries, Sheep Shelter Sheds, Boot and other Stores, Poultry Houses),
Dairies, and Country Houses and Cottages. Profusely Illustrated with Diagrams
and Plans. By Bobert Scott Burn.

In cloth gilt, price 5s., by post, 5s. id.

Practical Boat Building for Amateurs:

Containing full Instructions for Designing and Building Pun _

Sailing Boats, Ac. Fully illustrated with working diagrams. By
Neison, C.E. New Edition, revised and enlarged by Dixon Kemp (A'
“Yacht Designing,” “A Manual of Yacht and Boat Sailing,” &c.).

Adrian
.uthor of

Containing full Instructions for Designing and Building Punts, Skiffs, Canoes,
Boats, Ac. Fully illustrated with working diai
C.E. New Edition, revised and enlarged by Di
Designing,” “A Manual of Yacht and Boat Sidling,

In cloth gilt, price 2s, 6d., by post, 2s. 8d.

Art of Pyroteehny:

Being Comprehensive and Practical instructions for the Manufacture of Fire-
works, specially designed for the use of Amateurs. Profusely Illustrated. By
W. H. Browne, Ph.D, M.A., L.B.C.P., &c. Second Edition.

In cloth gilt, price 2s. 6d., by post, 2s. lOd.

Minor Fireworks:

Containing Instructions for the Manufacture of the Common and Simple Varieties
of Fireworks. For the Use of Amateurs. Illustrated. By W. H. Browne, Ph.D.,
MA., &c. (Author of “ The Art of PyTOtechny”).

In paper, price Is., by post. Is. Id.

Printing for Amateurs:

A Practical Guide to the ATt of Printing: containing Descriptions of Presses and
Materials, together nitb Details of the Processes employed, to which is added a
Glossary of Technical Terms. Illustrated. By P. E. Raynor.

In paper, price Is., by post Is. 2d.

Turning for Amateurs:

Containing full Description of the Lathe, with all its working parts and attach-
ments, and minute instructions for the effective use of them on wood, metal, and
ivory. Illustrated with 130 first class wood engravings. Second Edition.

In cloth gilt, price 2s. 6d., by post, 2s. 9d.

Carpentry and Joinery for Amateurs:

Working in oneet Metal, &c.

In cloth giltt price 2s. 6d.t by poet,2s. 9d.

above Arts,
of *• Turning

Working in Sheet Metal:

Being Practical Instructions for Making and Mending small Articles in Tin,
Copper, Iron, Zinc, and Brass. Illustrated. Third Edition. By the Author of
“ Turning for Amateurs," &c.

In paper, price 6d., by post, 64d.

Wood Carving for Amateurs:

Containing Descriptions of all the requisite Tools, and full Instructions for their
use in producing different varieties of Carvings. Illustrated.

In paper, price Is., by post. Is. Id.

Practical Mechanics for Amateurs:

A Series of Treatises on Turning, Carpentry and Joinery, Working in Sheet Metal,
Wood Carving, Firework Making, and Printing. Illustrated.

In Cloth gilt, price 10s. 6d„ by post. Us. 2d.

Organs and Organ Building:

Giving the History and Construction of the Modern Organ, and Descriptions of the
most remarkable Instruments. By C. A. Edwards.

In cloth gilt, price 5s., by post, 5s. 4d.﻿Practical Handbooks—Miscellaneous (continued).

The Northern Watering Places of France:

A Gnide for English People to the Holiday Resorts on the Coasts of the French
Netherlands, Picardy, Normandy and Brittany. By Rosa Baughan, Author of
“ Winter Havens in the Sunny Sonth,” &c.

In paper, price 2s., by post 2s. 2d.

Church Festival Decorations:

Comprising Directions and Designs for the Suitable Decoration of Churches for
Christmas, Easter, Whitsuntide, and Harvest. Illustrated.

In paper, price Is., by post Is. Id.

Artistic Flower Decorations:

For Ball Rooms, Halls, Passages, Dinner and Supper Tables ; with Directions for
making Bouquets, Buttonholes, Hair Sprays, &c. Illustrated. By B. 0. Sawahd.

In paper, price 2s., by post, 2s. 2d. .

Honiton Lace Book:

Containing Full and Practical Instructions for Making Honiton Lace. With
Illustrations.

In cloth gilt, price 3s. 6d„ by post, 3s. 9d.

Practical Dressmaking:

Being Plain Directions for Taking Patterns, Fitting on. Cutting out, Making up,
and Trimming Ladies’ and Children’s Dresses. By R. Munroe.

In paper, price Is., by post, Is. Id,

Sick Nursing at Home:

Being Plain Directions and Hints for the Proper Nursing of Sick Persons, and the
Home Treatment of Diseases and Accidents in case of sudden emergencies. By
S. F. A. Caulfield.

Price Is., by post, Is. Id.

Hints to Untrained Teachers:

Being Directions and Suggestions for the Assistance of Parents and others engaged
in Home Education. By Jane Ascham.

In paper, price 6d., by post 7d.

Stock and Share Investments:

Being Explanations for the General Reader of the Nature and Quality of the
different Classes of Securities dealt in on the Stock Exchange. By Albert
Sharwood.	In paper, price Is., by post, 1b. Id.

Catalogue of Ladies’ and Children’s Dress Patterns
(Illustrated) :

Comprising Ladies’ Dresses, Mantles, Underlinen, Girls* and Boys’ Costumes,
Children’s Underlinen, LadieB’ Caps, Dressing Jackets, &c. This list is added to
week by week, and at present contains nearly four hundred of the newest and
most seasonable designs.

Post free on application.

--------------

FICTION—CHEAP EDITIONS.

Loyella:	---------

By Mrs. Harry Bennett-Edwards, Author of “A Tantalus Cup,” “In Sheep’s
Clothing,” &c.

The Whitehall Review sayB: “‘Loyella’ is much better worth reading than nine-tenths
of the fiction published nowadays. The people who figure in its pages are wonderfully
life-like.”	In three vols.,price 15s.

Thira; or, The Cairn Braich:

An Historical Novel of the Eleventh Century,

“ This novel, which is weird and exciting, is written
World.

“ It is a stirring story of stirring times ’’—Academy.

In two voIb., price 7s. 6d.

with much ability.”— Christian﻿S)Ijp fl3apr, ?§>I}p rljangp §• JIBarf,

And Journal of the Household.

PUBLISHED EVERT MONDAT, WEDNESDAY & FRIDAY.

PRICE TWOPENCE (ILLUSTRATED).

Classified Advertisements of Thousands of Articles of every description for
Exchange, or Sale, or Wanted, by private persons. Through this department all kinds
of property may be procured or disposed of without publicity, with marvellous cheapness,
and PERFECT SECURITY FROM DISHONEST PERSONS, Full particulars are
given in each issue.

“ Like all grand conceptions the process is remarkable for its simplicity."—The Qlobe.
The Literary Portion consists of Art, Dramatic, Scientific, and Musical News of
le Week; Critiques on New Music, &c.; Articles and Notes upon Canaries and Foreign
ige Birds; Places at Home and
recently published; Various Literary !
eworks; Various Branches of Amateu
RecipeB of all kinds; Present Fashions, with origii
Fancy Work of different kinds; Cultivation of Flowers Fru
Operations; Bee Keeping; Dogs; Rabbits; Horses; FarmL
Reports of Poultry, Pigeon, and Rabbit Shows, &c., Sec.

orthy Books
cture of Fir

1; Practical Photography ;
id; Various Literary Subjects ; Organ Building;
iub Branches of Amateur Mechanics; Domestic M
Present Fashions, with original illi

ireign
Note-
Manu-

ics; Domestic Matters;
ustrations; dew Materials;
uit, and Vegetables : Garden
arming; Poultry; Pigeons;

EXTRA SUPPLEMENTS on the Boudoir, Garden, Sec., are given Monthly during
the Season without charge.

Terms of Subscription.	Quarterly. Half-yearly. Yearly.

One issue weekly............ 2s.	8d.	...	5s. 4d.	...	10s.	8d.

Two issues weekly........... 5s.	4d.	...	10s. 8d.	...	21s.	4d.

Three issues weekly ........ 8s.	Od.	...	16s. Od.	...	82s.	Od.

These prices include postage from the Head Office to the subscriber, but if preferred
the Agent will supply the copies, making a reduction for the cost of postage which would
be Bayed.

London: “THE BAZAAR” OFFICE, 170, STRAND, W.C.

REGISTERED
TRADE MARK

Certain Cure for Deafness.

OSBOBNFl’S

GOLDEN DROPS.

NEVER KNOWN TO PAIL.

By this valuable “ Specific ” hundreds have been cured of
this distressing malady. For cold in the Head, with noises in
the Ear, it is most efficacious.

Sold by all Chemists, price Is. 1 ^d., 2s. 9d., 4s. 6cZ., 11s.

Wholesale by Messrs. Sanger and Sons, Newbery and Sons, Barclay
and Sons, Edwards and Sons, Wholesale Chemists, London.

Free by post l£d. extra, from

E. M. OSBORISTE,

26, THAVIES’ IICTItiT, IjOZCTIDOYT.﻿STEVENS’ SILICON

JEWELLERY REVIVER
TABLET.

Large Size, Post Free, 24 Stamps.

THIS UNRIVALLED POLISH

(Direct from Nature's Laboratory)

Is not a manufactured article, but a very remarkable natural production,
the best substance known for Cleaning and Polishing Gold, Silver,
and Jewels without the least injury, and will prevent pearls becoming
discoloured.

Sold in a handsome little box, with Brush, Leather, Directions for
Use, an Analysis, and numerous Testimonials, price Is.

A large size, containing also a Bing Cleaning Stick, and one for
cleaning Studs and Buttons, price 2s.

The SILICON is also sold in Powder, for Plate Cleaning, at 6d.
and Is. per box, and in canisters at 2s. 6d.

To be had through all Chemists, Fancy Goods Dealers, and Jewellers
throughout the kingdom.

Wholesale of all London Fancy Warehouses and Wholesale Druggists,
and of the Proprietor,

GEORGE STEVENS,

376, STE/JL3STX), LOHSroOIISr.﻿Rowland’s Toilet Articles,

20, HATTON GARDEN, LONDON.

A.R 0 WLAND & S O N S
HATTON GARDEN.

ROWLAND’S ODONTO

Or PEARL DENTIFRICE is of inestimable value in preserving and beautifying
the teeth, strengthening the gums, and giving a pleasant fragrance to the breath ;
it eradicates tartar from the teeth, prevents and arrests decay, and polishes and
preserves the enamel, to -which it imparts a pearl-like whiteness. Its unprecedented
success for more than half a century shows the universal favor in which it is held,
while the fact of its being entirely free from any acid or mineral ingredients
constitutes it the safest and purest tooth powder ever used. To prevent fraud the
genuine Odonto has a 3d. Government stamp on the box. Ask for Rowland’s
Odonto.

ROWLAND’S MACASSAR OIL

Is universally in high repute for its unprecedented success during the last 80 years
in promoting the growth, restoring, improving, and beautifying the human hair.
It prevents hair from falling off or turning grey, strengthens weak hair, cleanses it
from scurf and dandriff, and makes it beautifully soft, pliable and glossy. For
children it is especially recommended, as forming the basis of a beautiful head of
hair, while its introduction into the nursery of Royalty is a sufficient proof of its
merits. Sold in usual four sizes.

ROWLAND’S KALYDOR,

An Eastern botanical preparation, perfectly free from all mineral or metallic
admixture. It is distinguished for its extremely bland, purifying, and soothing
effects on the skin; while by its action on the pores and minute secretory vessels, it
promotes a healthy tone, allays every tendency to inflammation, and thus effectually
dissipates all redness, tan, pimples, spots, freckles, discolourations, and other
cutaneous visitations. The radiant bloom it imparts to the cheek, the softness and
delicacy which it induces of the hands and arms, its capability of soothing irrita-
tion, and removing cutaneous defects, render it indispensable to every toilet.
Gentlemen after shaving will find it renders the skin soft, smooth, and pleasant.
Of all Chemists, at 4s. 6d. Avoid cheap spurious imitations. Sold by all dealers
in perfumery.﻿IMZFOIEMXAJSrT ZN-OTXCIE!

REES’ CHEAP PICTURES 5

GREAT
BARGAINS.

BEAUTIFUL LARGE MIRRORS.

m «

|l! II

|fl e*

if1 8Ti

**1 ll|

“p8	(5-0.0

"siHl

GREAT BARGAINS.

Handsome Gold Oral Frames, Chaste Designs, elegantly arranged.
Light Bracket at bottom. With brilliant Plate Glass.

Suitable for
Drawing, Dining,
Ball Rooms,
or

Grand Saloon.

Will travel safely
to any part of
tbe world.

Three feet from
top to bottom,
and nearly two
feet wide, £2 2s.
or £3 10s. the
pair.

Best Gold and
workmanship.

Black and Gold
same price.

ilMli

tsg n

gjf ts

3 pp. am

Waterloo Cup Winners.

7/6 each, or the Six for 21/- Carriage free.
Finely coloured. Size, 27in. by 20in.
Honeywood and Plunger. Donald.
Masterton. Coomassie. Honeymoon.
Master McGrath.

Celebrated Winners.

15/- each, Ten for £5, or Five for £3.
Coloured by hand, with Jockeys up (correct
portraits). Size, 36in. hy 24in.

Wheel of Fortune. Springfield. Roseberry.
Isonomy. Janette. Julius Ceesar. George
Frederick. Peter. Chamant. Petrarch.
1880. Bend Or. 1879. Sir Bevys. 1878. Sefton.
1877. Silvio. 1876. Kisber. 1875. Galopin.

Four Beautiful Chromos, Marine Subjects.

Equal to the originals, for 21s., recently sold at 25s. each.

COAST SCENE OFF YARMOUTH.

WALES

VENICE—No. 1.

No. 2.

Size, 27in. by 18in., mounted on Drawing Boards, and suitable for framing or the folio,

3 Very Fine Engravings, 25s.
Size 40in. by 27in.

1.	The English Gamekeeper.

2.	The Scotch	„

3.	The Huntsman and Hounds.
These were published at 42/- each.

5 Very Fine Large Engravings, 15s.

1.	The Champion of England. Baxter.

2.	The Spanish Wife’s Appeal. J. F. Lewis.

3.	Spanish Monks Preaching at Seville. Do.

4.	Labour.—5. Rest. J. F. Herring.

Average sizes 40in. by 27in.

Four Superior Chromos for 21s.

___ Sizes, 26in. by 19in., and 24in. by 16in.

THE WAY DOWN THE CLIFF. By Birket Foster. Lately sold for a guinea and a-half.
There is a peculiar charm about this picture which will make it quite a favourite.
The open sea in the distance, with children playing on the beach and on the cliffs.
BALA LAKE and LOCH TAY. A pair. By Pearson and Wainwright. These are, in
every respect, very fine, and will give great satisfaction.

RETURNING FROM MARKET. By Birket Foster. One of B. F.'s happiest produc-
tions. Two girls crossing a rivulet; cottage and sheep in background.

'As there is only a very Limited Number of many

IMPORTANT NOTICE,{

of the above, Orders must be sent in AT ONCE.
N.B.—All Frames will be made at Trade Prices.

GEORGE REES, 41, 42, and 43, Russell Street, Covent Garden.﻿WHY DOES HAIR FALL OFF?

From many causes. Sometimes from looal
disturbing agencies, such as sickness ; somo-
times from neglect in cleansing; but more
frequently from decay in the saps and
tissues which supply eaoh individual hair.
In such case,

OLDRIDGE’S

BALM OF COLUMBIA

Is an excellent corrective of the many insidious sources of decay which
ruin nature’s chief ornament.

It stimulates, strengthens, and increases the growth of Hair ; softens
and nourishes it when grown; and arrests its decline. Besides this, it
acts on those pigments the constant supply of which is essential to the
Hair retaining its oolour.

The Hair of the Head and the Whiskers and
Monstachios

Are alike benefited. For children it is invaluable, as it forms the basis
of a magnificent Head of Hair, prevents Baldness in mature age, and
obviates the use of dyes and poisonouB restoratives.

ESTABLISHED UPWARDS OF SIXTY YEARS.

(A sufficient guarantee of its efficacy).

Sold by all Perfumers and Chemists at 3s. 6d., 6s., and 11s. only.
Wholesale and Retail by the Proprietors,

C. & A. OLDRIDGE,

BALM OF COLUMBIA.

Established Upwards of Sixty Teajrs.﻿﻿﻿﻿﻿JOHN A. COWEN’S ASK ’IM II., BLUE AND TAN, PUPPED 1874.

co

0\

Ask ’im, blue and tan, pupped July, 1871.

Port, blue.

F. Snowball’s Boxer, blue (exhibited by
Tommy Thompson).

John Aynslev’s Gip, sandy.

T. J. Pickett’s Tear ’em,
blue (8429),

T. J. Pickett’s Tyne,
blue (8480),

I	I	W. Clark’s	Joicey’s	_____________I______________

Tartar.	Phoebe.	Scamp (sire of	Wassy.	i	i

I	Pickett’s Tear ’em	I	|	|

____________________!_	and Tyne).	_____________I______ W. Clark’s Scamp.	Daisy.

A dog of Capt. L. W. Atkinson’s. Phoebe.

Piper.	Clark’s Daisy.

Joicey’s Piper.	Clark’s Daisy.

Be

mcastle’s

Dog.

D. Dunn’s
Tartar.

Phoebe.	|	| |	|	Clark’s Billy.
1	R. Hoy’s Rock,	Clark’s Meg. J. Curley’s Scamp.	Clark’s Meg.

Clark’s Meg.

D. Dunn’s
Phoebe.

j	j A dog of Capt. Potts’.

Clark’s Billy.	Clark’s Wasp.

W. Cownen’s Billy.	Clark’s Wasp. (This bitch is same as dam of Clark’s Meg, above.)

J. Maugham’s Bustle.	A bitch of Bagalee’s Viper.

W. Weatherburn’s.	1

Bagalee’s Daisy.

Thompson’s Old Tip. Thompson’s Nimble. Viper, Moor House Dog.

Tip.	Bagalee’s Nimble. (Sister to Crowner and Rattler.)

Jos. Aynsley’s
Young Piper.

J. Anlerson’s	Coites’s

Old Piper.	Phoebe.

J. Anderson’s
Meg.

R. Bell’s

(of Wingate) Tug.

Jean (Sister to
Young Piper.)

Cowan’s

Burdett.

R. Cowan’s
(Rock Law)
Peachem.

A Bitch of
D. Moffat’s.

C. Dixon’s
Phoebe.

Sherwood’s J. Dodd’s
Matcham.	Phoebe.

C. Donkin’s
Pincher.

A bitch of
Wardle’s
(Framling-
ton.)

Donkin’s

Old

Pincher.

The Rennington	A. Riddle’s

Dog. (This dog	Wasp,

was brother to	I

A. Riddle’s	|

Wasp.)	1

W. Turnbull’s
(Holystone)
Pincher.

J. Thompson’s
Music.

A bitch of
W. Wardle’s.

A. Evans’ |
Venom. Donkin’s
Old Peachem.

Turnbull’s

Venom.

The Miller’s	A bitch	|	|

Dog, Felton.	of Carrs’, Mill’s (Neather-	Turnbull’s

Felton witton) Matchem.	Fan.

Hall.	I

R. Dixon’s
(Longhorsley)
Dusty,

J'

S'

g.

Squire Trevelyan’s (Neather-
witton) Old Flint, pupped 1782.

GO

to

'-0

British Dogs.	The Bedl