This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.
| identifier | question |
|---|---|
| A44204 | First, the Palatinate; then the other parts of Germany; afterwards the Low Countries; and then let us think in what condition England will stand? |
| A44193 | A.,[ London?] |
| A44193 | Hic Dolor, sed ubi Mediei ● a? |
| A44188 | : 1676?] |
| A44188 | There hath been one Civil War in England, since Henry the Seventh, who made that War? |
| A44188 | s.n.,[ London? |
| A44188 | the Barons? |
| A44199 | Were we invaded and persecuted at any time for pretended crimes, or rather because they were free from crime? |
| A44207 | Or what discourse have you at any time had with Sir Francis Holles about the Premises? |
| A44184 | How then can King or Queen Commissionate any or her Persons to be Judges in Equity of any Cause? |
| A44184 | Some question hath been made of Appeals from Courts of Equity, whether or no that House hath Cognisance of them? |
| A44184 | What can be said against this? |
| A44189 | But if the kings particular Order contrary to these laws must give supercedias to them, and be obeyed by us, What have we to answer then? |
| A44189 | Where will it stop? |
| A44189 | if you turn Renegadoes to the People that entrusted you? |
| A44189 | or who, or what can stop it? |
| A44187 | And from whom have we the testimony of these transactions to assure us of the matter of Fact? |
| A44187 | Can any man think the Bishops were there, and comprised under the general expression of les Seigneurs du Parlement? |
| A44187 | Can any thing be plainer? |
| A44187 | Certainly, they could not be then two different Estates, for they were all Feodal Barons; And what hath since hapned to make a difference? |
| A44187 | How then can they say, we will have no part in condemning him? |
| A44187 | Would it not set even Monarchy it self one degree lower? |
| A44187 | ],[ London? |
| A44192 | 3. and vvhat the Consequences are thereupon? |
| A44192 | And is it not as high a breach of the great Charter to intermit the greatest Court of Judicature beyond the time appointed by law? |
| A44192 | If this intermitting a parliament for above an year, be not contrary to these statutes, what can be? |
| A44192 | Must the members be allowed their priviledges and their 〈 ◊ 〉 during this time? |
| A44192 | SOME CONSIDERATIONS Upon the QUESTION, Whether the Parliament is Dissolved by its Prorogation for 15 Months? |
| A44192 | Some considerations upon the question, whether the Parliament is dissolved by it''s prorogation for 15 months? |
| A44192 | THE first Point in this Case is, Whether these tvvo Statutes are still in Force and not Repealed? |
| A44192 | To clear this point, it would be worth the asking, If the Parliament should pass Acts in February or March next, to what day should they relate? |
| A44192 | VVhen was there a parliament prorogued by proclamation? |
| A44192 | Whether the Parliament be still sitting, and hath been so ever since the prorogation? |
| A44192 | Why besides the prorogation are there alwayes Commissions to continue them over? |
| A44192 | ],[ London? |
| A44192 | was not that always done by Commission? |
| A44190 | And did not they make use of the price in their hands? |
| A44190 | And had they not an Art of delaying men, and making them attend when they could not mischief them by dispatching the business? |
| A44190 | And on the other side, did not we press to have all things left to the Law of the land, and to the antient and ordinary course? |
| A44190 | Did not that Faction put on all these things? |
| A44190 | Has not every particular been attempted by them? |
| A44190 | Have any of us ever refus''d to account, who were liable to it? |
| A44190 | How many Ministers wre pull''d out of their Livings for very small faults? |
| A44190 | Is it likely this would have been omitted if there had been the least colour of truth for it? |
| A44190 | Miles Corbet kept his Justice Seat, which was worth something to his Clerk, if not to him, what a continual Horse Fair it was? |
| A44190 | Now admit all true they said of us, was it to be compar''d to this? |
| A44190 | Then what must this be for? |
| A44190 | Was any preserv''d and deliver''d out of his trouble, that we or some of us had not a hand in it? |
| A44190 | Was ever Parliament so abus''d? |
| A44190 | Was there ever a more perfidious breach of Duty, did Rebellion it self ever outdo it, can any Man think? |
| A44190 | Were we not call''d the moderate Party? |
| A44190 | What Committees were set up? |
| A44190 | Whereupon Cromwel shewed himself, and in a pitiful Voice said, Major General, what shall I do? |
| A44190 | Who but they drew all business into the Parliament, especially when themselves or their Friends were any thing concern''d? |
| A44190 | Who more than they against all the Petitions from London and the Counties for disbanding of the Army, and complaining of their factious ways? |
| A44190 | branded with that Title( for they held it a crime) were we not said to favour Malignants? |
| A44190 | could a Mayor, or Officer, or a Burgess for Parliament be chosen almost in any Town of England, but with their leaves and according to their likings? |
| A44190 | did not we still oppose, hinder it all we could? |
| A44190 | have they not fully compleated that which was chiefly aimed at? |
| A44190 | how earnestly and how often have we mov''d the putting down those Committees? |
| A44190 | is it not a Decimo sexto to their Folio, a Mole- hill to their Mountain? |
| A44190 | nay, were any so but they? |
| A44190 | were any more violent in an arbitrary way of proceeding than they? |
| A70251 | And who accused them? |
| A70251 | He asked Bellingham if he did not remember, That he told them, that he was a poor Grasier, and had no Money? |
| A70251 | The Chief- Justice asked him, How he came to take notice that it was that very day? |
| A70251 | The Chief- Justice asked him, how he came to take notice, that they were there just that day? |
| A70251 | The Chief- Justice asked him, how he came to take so good notice of his seeing them the Monday? |
| A70251 | The Chief- Justice asked, Who were those Justices, and what were their Names? |
| A70251 | The Chief- Justice then asked him, Where they dined upon the Sunday? |
| A70251 | The Chief- Justice then asked him, if he took not Mac- Guy aside the 2 d time? |
| A70251 | Then Sedgwick the Father was presently called, and asked again, What day those two came to his house? |
| A70251 | They afterwards asked if Mac- Guy was still in Prison? |
| A70251 | Where they dined the Sunday before the day of the Robbery? |
| A70251 | Whereupon Mr. Sedgwick was presently called, and asked again, where the Gentlemen dined on Sunday? |
| A70251 | Whether it was Plowed- Land, or Stubble that the Butcher rode over, when he ran away from the Thieves, and they followed? |
| A70251 | he said, to an English- man: I asked him then, if that English- man would tell me so much? |
| A63732 | And who accused them? |
| A63732 | He asked Bellingham if he did not remember, That he told them, that he was a poor Grasier, and had no Money? |
| A63732 | The Chief- Justice asked him, How he came to take notice that it was that very day? |
| A63732 | The Chief- Justice asked him, how he came to take notice, that they were there just that day? |
| A63732 | The Chief- Justice asked him, how he came to take so good notice of his seeing them the Monday? |
| A63732 | The Chief- Justice asked, Who were those Justices, and what were their Names? |
| A63732 | The Chief- Justice then asked him, Where they dined upon the Sunday? |
| A63732 | The Chief- Justice then asked him, if he took not Mac- Guy aside the 2 d time? |
| A63732 | Then Sedgwick the Father was presently called, and asked again, What day those two came to his house? |
| A63732 | They afterwards asked if Mac- Gay was still in Prison? |
| A63732 | Where they dined the Sunday before the day of the Robbery? |
| A63732 | Whereupon Mr. Sedgwick was presently called, and asked again, where the Gentlemen dined on Sunday? |
| A63732 | Whether it was Plowed- Land, or Stubble that the Butcher rode over, when he ran away from the Thieves, and they followed? |
| A63732 | he said, to an English- man: I asked him then, if that English- man would tell me so much? |
| A44191 | 14. who would have had him command his Brother to divide the Inheritance with him; Man, who made me a Judge, and a Divider? |
| A44191 | 144. endeavour to destroy the most ancient Court of Chancery, which he calls both a Reproach, and Grievance to the Nation? |
| A44191 | 21. clearly shews, that all Canons accustomably used, are still in force; Who hath then taken off the Penalty? |
| A44191 | 3. to be whether the Counties in all this time had their Representatives in Parliament by the Formality of a Choice? |
| A44191 | 8th? |
| A44191 | And doth this Author think the Law to be otherwise? |
| A44191 | And if they were bound to come, can Absence be reasonably pleaded to free any from the Obligation of what was then agreed on? |
| A44191 | And should you, Sir, ask me, why I omitted the mentioning of them? |
| A44191 | Atwood, William, d. 1705? |
| A44191 | But how doth this follow? |
| A44191 | But if William the First was an absolute Conqueror, as he all along yeilds to Dr. Brady, where was the consent of the People to his Government? |
| A44191 | But let[ Ordo] signify that Estate as he would have it, and as he thinks it doth; why must it signify an intire Estate? |
| A44191 | But what can be more pernicious than such dissembling? |
| A44191 | But what if this Accusation had been true? |
| A44191 | But what is more pernicious than this Simulation? |
| A44191 | But, pray Sir, why did you not rather give us a Translation of these Words of your own? |
| A44191 | Can any one now think the Lords would suffer Thomas Percy to dispose of a hundred and twenty Votes? |
| A44191 | Can any thing be more agreable to the Practice at this day against Men that fly from Justice, and are convicted for non- appearance? |
| A44191 | Can it be lawful to debate and to determine a thing, which it is unlawful to pronounce? |
| A44191 | Did he not continue the Roman Religion all his time? |
| A44191 | Doth he not spend some Leaves to shew how this may be effected? |
| A44191 | Dr. Heylin will tell you that Clerus was never taken for the Bishops, distinct from the other Clergy: By what Title do they then claim it? |
| A44191 | Here you see the King advised not with his Prelates, but with the Earls, Barons, and other Nobles, and what did they advise? |
| A44191 | How then can they be said to be there a Third Estate, to represent the Clergy of England, when they sit not there as Clergy- men? |
| A44191 | If every Cheater had been a Traytor, the King would have had enow to hang? |
| A44191 | If the Author of the Letter have made an imperfect Translation, why did not you mend it? |
| A44191 | In Edward the sixth''s time, Cranmer had his Episcopal Dignity during Pleasure, Was he then a Baron at will? |
| A44191 | Is it lawful to discuss and determine what is unlawful to pronounce? |
| A44191 | Is it not now a thousand Pities, that so well sounding Words, so well put together, should signifie nothing? |
| A44191 | Is it possible to think that Bishops come in that fag end? |
| A44191 | Is not this as good as Chaucer''s Fryer that this Author quips me with, p. 4.? |
| A44191 | N. 30. against the Earl of Holland, and others, which was not three Years before? |
| A44191 | N. B. who were these others? |
| A44191 | Nay, what became of the whole Hierarchy? |
| A44191 | Neither, to speak my Mind freely, can I see how he could be accused of Treason; for, Who was the Accuser? |
| A44191 | Now how this can prove them a third Estate in the Lords House, I should be glad this Author would instruct me? |
| A44191 | Now if the Question be asked who are those, must not the Answer be, the Earls and Barons? |
| A44191 | Nunquid discutere& definire licitum est, quod pronunciare non licet? |
| A44191 | Sed quid hac simulatione perniciosius est? |
| A44191 | Sed quid hac simulatione perniciosius est? |
| A44191 | Should I admit this for once? |
| A44191 | That is to say, Whether the Jury for the Trial of Bishops shall be composed of Noble- Men, or of Commoners? |
| A44191 | The Point in question in the Record was, what Offence the Murther of this publick Minister was? |
| A44191 | The Question is not, Whether the Clergy and Laity are distinct Estates? |
| A44191 | The Question which is asked the Prisoners after their Plea, is, not who shall give Sentence upon thee? |
| A44191 | Unless a prior Law be shewn, which excludes the Commons from one Council, but admits them to the other? |
| A44191 | Was here now any Willingness in the Court to break the Law? |
| A44191 | Was this Treason? |
| A44191 | Was this now a dilatory Answer, and not a clear Discharge? |
| A44191 | What doth any Accountant in the Exchequer do more? |
| A44191 | What if this shall be granted him? |
| A44191 | What then? |
| A44191 | What then? |
| A44191 | Whether our present House of Commons, in the same form as it is now constituted, was not in being ever after the Conquest? |
| A44191 | Whoever denied the Bishops Consent in a Legislative way? |
| A44191 | Why did not now the Prelates come in and claim their Right? |
| A44191 | but how wilt thou be tryed? |
| A44191 | by any Grant from the King that should be produced by Usage or Allowance? |
| A44191 | doth this Omission supersede those Precedents laid down by him in that Rapsody, as he calls it, which was as much his as the other? |
| A44191 | of quia emptores Terrarum, called to Parliament as Barons? |
| A44191 | or what doth it more import, than that it was done by the Joint- Consent of the Lords and Commons? |
| A44191 | was it more against his Prerogative, than of any of his Predecessors? |