Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier	question
12049	Before the law they are equal, but, as a matter of fact, where the law does not interfere, how is it in regard to the property rights of the wife?
4365	()___-____ Convey results of estimate/ search by telephone_ yes_ no Fee enclosed?
4365	3. Who may file a Notice of Intent To Enforce?
4365	WHAT IS PUBLICATION?
28750	Question: Was any of the original ironwork left?
28750	Question: Where did the old chandeliers you installed in the ceiling come from?
28750	Question: Where did you get your ideas for the woodwork?
4318	Did the subcommittee take these problems into consideration and did they do anything to try and help the teachers to better understand section 107?
4318	Have the teachers been protected by this section 107?
4318	Mr. Chairman, if the gentleman will yield further, then the NEA is satisfied with the language in the bill as it now stands; is that correct?
4318	Mr. Chairman, will the gentleman yield?
36161	Do you really think, Sir, that such a constitution as this can avail to justify those who, like yourself, are engaged in enforcing it?
36161	Is it not plain that they are stupendous blockheads, if they imagine that they are anything else than such a cabal?
36161	or that their so- called laws impose the least obligation upon anybody?
41075	But how long will this ownership or control continue?
41075	During lifetime, or for a longer period?
41075	If two wills, in duplicate, were in possession of the testator, and he destroyed one, did this, in effect, work a revocation?
41075	Or, is the law appertaining to this subject founded on the common law, or is it the creation of the statute?
41075	The gist of inquiry is: Does the law of charitable uses exist in those States where the statute of Elizabeth is not in force, or has been repealed?
41075	The will must be in writing, and the only question is, what is the meaning of the words used in that writing?
41075	What is the definition of a person_ non compos mentis_?
5180	Contours of the Relevant Forum: the Library''s Collection as a Whole or the Provision of Internet Access?
5180	Do CIPA''s Disabling Provisions Cure the Defect?
5180	Narrow Tailoring C. Less Restrictive Alternatives D. Do CIPA''s Disabling Provisions Cure the Defect?
5180	What Is Filtering Software, Who Makes It, and What Does It Do?
5180	What Is Filtering Software, Who Makes It, and What Does It Do?
7773	1: Paragraph 28 So why do n''t they do that, if it would be easier and faster?
7773	Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you like the play?
7773	Was n''t Hutton Trust the trustee and supposed to be holding the fund?
7773	Where would Hutton& Co. get the money?
29513	Can this Court revise and reverse it?
29513	If we consult the history of the day, does it not inform us that the United States were at least as anxious to obtain it as the Cherokees?
29513	Is this the rightful exercise of power, or is it usurpation?
29513	Or has nature, or the great Creator of all things, conferred these rights over hunters and fishermen, on agriculturists and manufacturers?
29513	The more important inquiry is, does it exhibit a case cognizable by this tribunal?
29513	Were not both parties desirous of it?
29513	When the United States gave peace, did they not also receive it?
29513	Will these powerful considerations avail the plaintiff in error?
29513	or to compel their submission to the violence of disorderly and licentious intruders?
17971	And why was it unjust?
17971	And why, then, should we hesitate to pursue a similar course in respect to the so- called Southern Confederacy?
17971	But when the laws of war are in force, what, I ask, is one of those laws?
17971	How came that government in danger?
17971	Or does any statesman or jurist question our right so to do?
17971	What are you now about in Congress?
17971	What has brought this wicked war, with all its evils and horrors, upon us?
17971	Whence comes the necessity for this uprising of the people?
13568	1 WHY THE FEDERAL AMENDMENT?
13568	7?
13568	CHAPTER I WHY THE FEDERAL AMENDMENT?
13568	Do these indicate wilful fraud or mere ignorance and carelessness?
13568	If not, why not?
13568	Was the election an honest one?
13568	What preparation have we made to meet such a possible result?
13568	Where did they come from?
13568	Who then are the voters of nine counties who kept the women of an entire state disfranchised?
13568	Why should women be denied the privilege thus established?
13568	Would Federal Amendment violate local self- government or conflict with State Rights?
39502	If such action would have lain at common law, is it taken away by the statute of 8th Anne?
39502	Protection is extended to foreign works[ first?]
39502	V. Whether this right is any way impeached, restrained, or taken away by the statute of 8th Anne?
39502	[ 1912?]
39502	of| None| 1885|||Int.,( 5|||||within yr.)|| Dominican Rep.|MEXICO?
39502	{ Sidenote: Are thoughts created?}
39502	|within[ 1912?]
39502	||country Panama| None|Life+ 80|||As in 1904|||||Colombia{ Sidenote: West Indies} Cuba|MEXICO?
39502	||||Uncertain|||||protection Bulgaria|||||Uncertain 1896?
2373	But from his point of view, what is the difference between being fined and taxed a certain sum for doing a certain thing?
2373	But what does it mean to a bad man?
2373	But why do you imply it?
2373	Do we deal with criminals on proper principles?
2373	Does punishment deter?
2373	Has the defendant gained a right or not?
2373	If so, why should it not be required in all contracts?
2373	Is it a useful form?
2373	Sometimes the desirability of peace, but why is peace more desirable after twenty years than before?
2373	Take the fundamental question, What constitutes the law?
2373	What does this mean?
2373	What have we better than a blind guess to show that the criminal law in its present form does more good than harm?
2373	What significance is there in calling one taking right and another wrong from the point of view of the law?
2373	Why is a false and injurious statement privileged, if it is made honestly in giving information about a servant?
2373	Why is a man at liberty to set up a business which he knows will ruin his neighborhood?
2373	Why should any merely historical distinction be allowed to affect the rights and obligations of business men?
53541	***** In what respect did the_ Mosher_ show less diligence and skill than required?
53541	Are Mortgages Maritime Contracts?
53541	Do these facts establish that the shareholders in the Daniel Kaine were partners in her ownership?
53541	Favored in Maritime Law 54 2. Who Are Seamen?
53541	Has he succeeded in this?
53541	Is the tug responsible for this loss?
53541	Is vicarious liability the true test or the doctrine of fellow service?
53541	It is this: Ought we to imply a condition in the contract that an interruption such as this was to excuse the parties from further performance of it?
53541	Nationality means rather-- To what country does the ship in fact belong and to whose protection is she entitled?
53541	The Court said: Is the pilot responsible in damages for this accident?
53541	The court said that the tow and tug were, in law, one vessel, and the question was, which one?
53541	The first question is, what degree of diligence and skill was required of the tug?
53541	The inquiry is: Who is to blame for this?
53541	The only question in all such cases is, was she in fault?
8691	Certainly, Sir,was the quick retort,"and may I beg your honor to take the wool out of your ears?
8691	Are the courts to send such questions to a jury or shall the judges decide them?
8691	But may not a power be judicial in its nature and yet not wholly so?
8691	But out of what did this doctrine spring?
8691	But what is a suit?
8691	But what shall be the nature of this office, and who shall decide whether these conditions have been fulfilled and these papers filed?
8691	Can anything less than that be considered as due process of law?
8691	Can that be deemed a judicial sentence to imprisonment which is a sentence to imprisonment during the pleasure of certain administrative officials?
8691	Could they sue and be sued in the courts of the United States?
8691	How far can the courts, in dealing with these, govern their action by that of the executive?
8691	If so, ought not the fate to be meted out to them by judicial authority?
8691	Rufus Choate once said that the question at bottom was, Are you afraid to trust the people?
8691	What is due process of law?
8691	What is property?
8691	What serves to establish one?
8691	What, he asked, was this law of the land by which all things were to be tried and judged?
8691	Who, he asked, were the present judges of their Supreme Court?
12235	But how far is this democratic claim that the laws of a State are all contained in one book borne out by the facts?
12235	But is it necessarily criminal?
12235	But who shall determine whether it is a private, local or special act, or a general law?
12235	How did it arise?
12235	How many of us have ever formulated in our minds what_ law_ means?
12235	How, then, did they invent a legislature?
12235	Is it not possible to begin with a broader and more simple division?
12235	Or are we to infer that people were more truthful in those days?
12235	These may be still tried by_ quo warranto_; meaning, by what warrant do you claim to exercise this office, this monopoly, this privilege?
12235	What is the fact?
12235	Wine, or beer, use of never regulated by sumptuary legislation; sweet white wine not to be sold at retail; sweet wine( Spanish?)
12235	Would legislation prohibiting such employment to women be unconstitutional?
12235	[ Footnote 3: This is law in Utah; but nevertheless a letter from a State government official informs me that women are willing to[ and do?]
12235	or still more, the amount of business offering, or the amount of possible competition?
31335	Would the admission of the negro as a citizen tend in the least to lessen, endanger or impair the enjoyment of our governmental institutions?
31335	Are we deprived of the rights, immunities, and privileges of American citizens?
31335	But were they mistaken?
31335	But where are the classics of our local history?
31335	Did the Declaration of Independence, for example, include negroes?
31335	Is our liberty restricted?
31335	Is the rod of oppression held over us by the General Government?
31335	Or did the system have limitations?
31335	Or will they oppose the proposition and thereby brand themselves as Tories?
31335	Satisfied with existing conditions, he asked:"Are we slaves?
31335	Shall the Constitution guarantee to all persons, irrespective of color, the right to acquire, hold, and transmit property?
31335	Shall the public schools of the State be open to persons of color?
31335	Shall the right of suffrage be extended to Negroes?
31335	Shall the testimony of Negroes be accepted in the courts?
31335	So the question before the Convention was: Shall the Judges be elected by the people or shall they be chosen by the General Assembly?
31335	Then why urge this measure, uncalled for by the people, unwarranted by the condition of the Territory?"
31335	Was it universally applicable?
31335	Was the militia to be composed exclusively of"able- bodied white male citizens?"
31335	Were they able to defeat the Constitution on the issue of its imperfections?
31335	What were the duties of Auditor, that they could not be performed for a salary of$ 500 or$ 600?
31335	Where and how is the balance to be found by the North and East for Texas?
31335	Where is it to be found but in the steadfast part of America?
31335	Who are the historians of the Commonwealths?
31335	Why?
31335	Will they support the proposition to establish a State government and thus follow in the footsteps of the Fathers of the Revolution?
31335	With the electorate the primary question was not,"Is the candidate well grounded in the principles of government and administration?"
31335	but"What are his political affiliations?"
31335	pray for the establishment of a new Territory?
22359	[ 35] Is not this probably the history of the decline of the profession in all countries from an honorable office to a money- making trade? 22359 And if I am required to say, who is the best? 22359 And what offence to truth or morality does his advocate commit in discharging that duty to the best of his learning and ability? 22359 But what are the limits of his duty when the legal demands or interests of his client conflict with his own sense of what is just and right? 22359 Can any disclaimer be more complete? 22359 Have they, too, sunk to become clods of the valley? 22359 His own measure of true greatness, humanly speaking, he has left behind him, in very emphatic words:If I am asked, who is the greatest man?
22359	How determined, if necessary to the decision of the question?
22359	How did they seek to do this?
22359	Is he not then a participator in the injustice?
22359	It becomes important to inquire what are the true ends of society and government?
22359	Shall his own physical and intellectual productions so long survive him?
22359	The question really is, what is best for the people at large,--what will be most likely to secure them a high- minded, honorable Bar?
22359	What apology can he make for throwing up his brief?
22359	What said Mr. Adolphus and his witness, Sarah Mancer?
22359	When I could speak, which was not immediately, I said,"Of course then you are going to plead guilty?"
22359	Where is the profession, which, in this world, holds out brighter rewards?
22359	[ 11] How then is he to acquit himself?
22359	[ 23] How far, then, can he safely go in delaying the cause for the benefit of, and in pursuance of the instructions of his client?
22359	appeal to Heaven for its testimony to a lie, and not expect to be answered by its lightning?
22359	make such an appeal, conscious that an honorable colleague sat beside me, whose valued friendship I must have forever forfeited?
10065	Have you a copy of the French Constitution?
10065	Am I unduly pessimistic?
10065	Americans have never lacked interest in English history; for however broad the stream of our national life, how could we ignore its chief source?
10065	And have we now forgotten that powerful Friend or do we imagine that we no longer need His assistance?
10065	And if a sparrow can not fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?
10065	But suppose the development of labour- saving machinery should reach a stage where all human labour was eliminated, what would be the effect on man?
10065	But what can man- made law do in this warfare against the blind forces of Nature?
10065	But what of its future and how long will the Constitution wholly resist the washing of time and circumstance?
10065	But when in the history of American business was there such a volume of broken faith as in the drastic deflation of 1920?
10065	Conceding that lawlessness is not a novel phenomenon, is not the present time characterized by an exceptional revolt against the authority of law?
10065	From such an assembly can a perfect production be expected?
10065	If, to please the people, we offer what we ourselves disapprove, how can we afterwards defend our work?
10065	Is it not possible that modern democracy is in danger of strangulation by its present- day methods and ideals?
10065	Is it surprising that so portentous a change should have fevered his brain and disturbed his mental equilibrium?
10065	Is it well that while we range with Science, glorying in the Time, City children soak and blacken soul and sense in city slime?"
10065	Is there in this day and generation a spirit of lawlessness greater or different than that that has always characterized human society?
10065	May not the current thought of our time be compared with the mighty Mississippi in the period of a spring freshet?
10065	Our constant inquiry is,"Is it so nominated"in that compact?
10065	Our fathers could not talk over the telephone for three thousand miles, but have we surpassed them in thoughts of enduring value?
10065	The destinies of the English- speaking world are bound up with her fortunes and migrations and its conquests are justified by her works"?
10065	What was the vision to which the Wise Man referred?
10065	When did a nobler"vision"inspire men in the political annals of mankind?
10065	When was a great secret better kept?
10065	Who can question that this is pre- eminently the age of the sham and the counterfeit?
36145	And devastate our homes, and shoot us down by the hundreds of thousands, if we resist?
36145	And why are these men so ready to lend money for murdering their fellow men?
36145	And why did these men abolish slavery?
36145	And why?
36145	How can we know which are_ their_ houses, that we may burn or demolish them?
36145	How many of those who now support the Constitution, will ever do this?
36145	How many will ever dare openly proclaim their right to govern?
36145	How shall we defend ourselves and our property against them?
36145	How shall we find these men?
36145	How shall we know them from others?
36145	If so, where are their signatures?
36145	Or what government, except one resting upon the sword, like the one we now have, was ever capable of maintaining slavery?
36145	Restrain us of our liberty?
36145	Subject us to their arbitrary dominion?
36145	The Constitution itself, then, being of no authority, on what authority does our government practically rest?
36145	The only question is, what power did I put into his hands?
36145	Until they have tried the experiment for themselves, how can they have the face to impose the Constitution upon, or even to recommend it to, others?
36145	Was it an absolute and irresponsible one?
36145	Were Mr. A, Mr. B, and Mr. C members of it?
36145	What is the motive to the secret ballot?
36145	What is this but absolute, irresponsible power?
36145	Where is your evidence that you, either individually or collectively, ever appointed me your attorney?
36145	Where the evidence of their membership?
36145	Where the open, authentic proof?
36145	Where the record?
36145	Which their persons, that we may kill them, and rid the world and ourselves of such tyrants and monsters?
36145	Which_ their_ property, that we may destroy it?
36145	Who are the men,_ the responsible men_, who rob us of our property?
36145	Who, but such usurpers, robbers, and murderers as they, ever established slavery?
36145	Who, of our neighbors, are members of this secret band of robbers and murderers?
36145	Who, then, created these debts, in the name of"the United States"?
36145	[ b] Suppose it be"the best government on earth,"does that prove its own goodness, or only the badness of all other governments?
36145	[ f] Of what appreciable value is it to any man, as an individual, that he is allowed a voice in choosing these public masters?
36145	and neither have, nor ever had, any corporate existence?
36145	but that he had refused or neglected to do so?
36145	never made any corporate or individual contract?
36145	or a limited and responsible one?
36145	or take the legitimate responsibility of their acts?
36145	or that I have now broken any faith I ever pledged to you?
36145	that he had had the opportunity to sign it, if he would?
36145	that he ought to have signed it?
36145	that this other man had promised to sign it?
36145	that you ever required me to swear to you, that, as your attorney, I would support the Constitution?
40679	And why should they?
40679	But how long were these constitutions, these republican forms, to exist?
40679	If requisitions are made and are not complied with, what is to be done?
40679	In what way, and in what sense, could one of them be made paramount over the other?
40679	The question arises then, What is that form?
40679	Was it to consist of one or of two houses?
40679	Was nothing due to the virtue and sense and patriotism of a majority of the people of the United States?
40679	Was the Constitution to go into operation at all, unless adopted by all the States, and if so, what number should be sufficient for its establishment?
40679	Was the commercial power to experience a like diminution from the full proportions of a just authority over the external trade of the States?
40679	What then was to be done?
40679	What then were the motives which appear to have led the convention of that State to agree to this concession of the commercial power?
40679	What was to mark this distinction as real, and give it practical effect?
40679	What was to secure them?
40679	When such an inability is supposed to have occurred, and is not made known by the President himself, how is it to be ascertained?
40679	Who was to enforce the rules which the people of a State had prescribed for their own action, when threatened by an insurgent and powerful minority?
40679	Who was to protect them against foreign invasion or domestic violence?
40679	Who was to stand as their guarantor and protector, and to vindicate the right of the majority to govern and alter and modify?
40679	Would such a scheme be practicable?
40679	Would the people of South Carolina consider the provisions made for their peculiar demands as equivalents for what had been surrendered?
40679	Would they consider the situation of their country?
40679	and if the latter, what was to be the representation and the rule of suffrage in each?
40679	whether the agreement of the nine States required by the Confederation was to be made by their legislatures, or by their delegates in Congress?
28197	And may we not appeal also to our brethren of the South-- and ask their fair consideration of the two propositions I have suggested? 28197 Where, I ask, is the good ship Virginia, in the array of the national fleet?
28197	And what is the result?
28197	And who are we, we may be permitted to ask, to whose hands this charge has been committed?
28197	And, gentlemen, would he not as likely give to those who_ could not_ tell?
28197	Does the preaching such language to slaves tend to pacification?
28197	Gentlemen, did he not give Mr. King one, because he thought that he_ would not_ mention it?
28197	If so, does not this libel of itself afford sufficient evidence of malice, without resorting to the matter of other pamphlets not charged?
28197	In other words, to see what legal inferences of additional evidence such inscriptions afford?
28197	Is it unreasonable to suppose that he was deterred by the warning?
28197	It was also asked why the person who gave the bundle to him in New York was not brought to testify in his favor?
28197	May not any man be subjected to be treated as a felon, upon the instigation of private malice, or party animosity, or religious rancor?
28197	May we not appeal to the experience of eleven years, to show that the work in which we are engaged can be conducted without excitement or alarm?
28197	May we not claim at least this merit for our labors:--that they are safe?
28197	Now if but one of fifty was given out, is it not as probable that he did not desire to publish them, as that he did?
28197	Ought not this to join all hearts, and call forth renewed exertions from those whose labors have thus far been crowned with unexpected success?
28197	Shall it be said that we are not liable to the same vicissitudes that have overtaken other nations?
28197	The loan to Mr. King was the only instance proved of distribution, and could that be considered malicious?
28197	Then why resort to them?
28197	There are two questions in this case: are the libels charged criminal?--are they proved to have been published by the traverser?
28197	What does he propose for the slave?
28197	What is the natural result, if some means are not applied to prevent it?
28197	What is the next consequence?
28197	What proof could this appropriation or adoption afford of a malicious intent in their publication?
28197	What was the case?
28197	Why did he not?
28197	Why do not his counsel advise it?
28197	Why does not this_ persecuted_ man bring his action for false imprisonment?
28197	Witness or one of the magistrates asked Crandall"whether he was aware of the nature of the pamphlets when he left New York?"
28197	_ Judge Morsell._ Did Crandall make any remark, when you took the pamphlet?
28197	_ Question by Key._ Which of the pamphlets did you find at the office, and which at the house?
28197	_ Thruston, J._ Would the amalgamation occur after our throats are cut, Mr. Jeffers?
28197	what, indeed, but the frightful wickedness and cruelty which are its actual fruits?"
17041	But do you think the driver tried to cut him off?
17041	Did he turn on the brake handle? 17041 Did you hear the lawyer say in a case he tried in Brooklyn he had seventeen of those experts?"
17041	Did you see the car hit the wagon?
17041	Do you believe in the United States of America?
17041	Do you know the officer who made the arrest?
17041	Gentlemen,says the judge,"have you agreed upon a verdict?"
17041	Gentlemen,says the judge,"how long will you take in your address?"
17041	Ha, Ha,thinks the lawyer"at last,""did n''t you just now say you were sitting on the fourth seat?"
17041	Heavens,think the jury,"are we going to have the whole case over again?"
17041	Is he your husband?
17041	My husband, your Honor? 17041 Vel, the motorman vas Irish, vot you talking about?"
17041	What do you say?
17041	What do you work at?
17041	What,says one juryman,"do you think those pleadings would show anything a reasonable man could understand?"
17041	Why should you try to scratch the man''s face? 17041 Why,"asks the juryman,"did n''t the defendant give back the goods if they were not what she wanted?"
17041	Why,he says,"does not the court get in an efficiency expert on this calendar evil and have it arranged on a business basis?"
17041	And how are the jury to frame their decision before the evidence has been presented?
17041	Are not the lives, property, or reputations of particular men at stake?
17041	Are the jury to hear a story of bitter resentment or of passion and crime, or a calm demand for the payment of a debt?
17041	As a juryman once said to a lawyer after the case:"Why did you excuse me when I said I knew the other lawyer?
17041	But in that contract case where the other side wanted something back from the plaintiff, how are they going to find a verdict for both?
17041	Did he forget something?
17041	Did he switch on the emergency?"
17041	Did n''t he have to hold down his job with the company?"
17041	Did the plaintiff during years of effort build up a business and take the defendant in as a partner only to be defrauded by him?
17041	Do you call that justice?
17041	For example, the lawyer asks,"What did you tell your wife about the accident when you got home?"
17041	If the plaintiff did not have a case, why did the judge let them go on?
17041	In the first place, jury trial is so deeply engraved in the constitutional bill of rights that one might as well ask:"Do you believe in citizenship?"
17041	Is he going to drive the client away from them?
17041	Is not the best way of knowing whether a man is telling the truth to look at him and watch him while he is talking?
17041	Is she not now giving someone an account of the accident?
17041	Of course, is that not the reason for their being there?
17041	Shall everything be allowed in and a photographic picture of numerous details be given to the court?
17041	She is asked:"At the time of the accident, where were you?"
17041	The customary question asked jurymen, whether, given such and such a state of facts,"Do you think you could render a fair and impartial verdict?"
17041	The lawyer asks again,"Did n''t you tell your wife the horses were going very fast?"
17041	The proper question would be:"What happened next?"
17041	The question is,"What kind of a cow was it you saw in the plaintiff''s garden?"
17041	What did he do?"
17041	What have they got to do with it?
17041	What was there that he did not remember?
17041	Which will you do?"
17041	Who are these women who are brought in a crowd together?
17041	Why are they there?
17041	Why ca n''t the witnesses tell what they know?
17041	Why do n''t the lawyers come over and talk to the jury like that?
17041	Why does n''t the lawyer ask the witness that question about what he told Smith or what he told his wife?
17041	Why does the judge make such absurd rulings?
17041	Will the case be dismissed because he forgot to tie a shoe lace or put in a pin?
17041	Yet what is the effect?
17041	Yet without counsel''s prologue what could be more dull than the naming of street numbers and dates?
38231	What do you object to if this is done without profit?
38231	About what is that last one?
38231	Are n''t they your own property?
38231	As a matter of fact, do n''t you buy most of your publications?
38231	But you want the power of doing that lending yourselves?
38231	Carrying out the analogy with patents, what would you say about the right of a man who buys a patent to dispose of it in any way he pleases?
38231	Do the singers and musicians give their services free?
38231	Do they charge an admission?
38231	Do you mean$ 3,000 or$ 4,000 a year?
38231	Does not that, then, give the man a property right which he can use as he pleases-- where you have made no restrictions whatever?
38231	Does that give any notice to the purchaser of this book that he can not rent or loan it?
38231	For charity or profit or any reason?
38231	Has this been brought up?
38231	Have the courts interpreted this in any way?
38231	How lately have you been putting that notice in your copyright books?
38231	How many publications have you in your establishment that are bought outright?
38231	How many?
38231	How was the use of that restricted when it was purchased?
38231	I mean before we left New York?
38231	I want to ask where there is anything in that notice that would give notice to the purchaser that he could not rent or loan those books?
38231	If I buy a piece of music ought I not to have a right to do what I please with it?
38231	Is it not a matter of fact that you make the sale without any contract?
38231	Is there anything in that notice that would caution them that they must not lend these books?
38231	It is a matter of contract?
38231	Let me ask you how it gives any notice whatever that the purchaser can not rent or lend the book?
38231	May I correct a typographical error?
38231	May I make a suggestion?
38231	No objection to their loaning them?
38231	Now, has he not the right that he can dispose of that machine to anybody he chooses?
38231	Now, suppose we cut that all out?
38231	Now, they have committed a crime?
38231	Ought I not to have that right?
38231	The object that is patented under the patent?
38231	Then you do n''t buy them outright?
38231	This penalty clause of it?
38231	We can not affect that in any way?
38231	Well, in public?
38231	What do you think the public would borrow these for if not for public performance?
38231	What information would that notice give them?
38231	What is that suit you were going to explain?
38231	What the committee is getting at is whether you give the people you sell these books to any notice at all that they can not rent them?
38231	Where is the justice now, when he has his place stocked up, in preventing him from making any profit on it?
38231	Who makes that estimate?
38231	Who was it?
38231	Why?
38231	Without any restriction?
38231	Would not that be a good deal better than the way it is?
38231	Would you be satisfied if we were to restrict the performance of your music to charitable performances or where no charge was made?
38231	You do not allow any comments?
38231	You sell that without any restriction?
38231	Your idea is that nobody but a person who buys a piece of copyright music should have a right to perform it publicly?
31424	Against this evident mistake or wilful perversion, what is the evidence?
31424	Am I not right in saying, nothing whatever-- nothing more than any man would be subject to, who acted as counsel?
31424	And how could he know it?
31424	And if he did not, is he not to be presumed to have assented?
31424	But what is it?
31424	But when explained by Mr. Minns, what is it?
31424	Can not we show by him that a part of this return is matter of form, and that he does not know whether it is true or not?
31424	Dana._ Do you know the person you arrested, was the person named in the warrant?
31424	Dana._ Does the Commissioner mean to rule that a man may be hung in a criminal case, on the return of an officer in another, and that a civil case?
31424	Dana._ Mr. Riley, do you know whether the man you arrested was the man named in the original warrant?
31424	Dana_--Do you deny you did so?
31424	Davis._ Do you remember his saying anything further concerning his position, showing any religious feeling?
31424	Davis._ It was that which reminded me of fugitive slave warrants?
31424	Davis._ What Mr. Morris?
31424	Did your Honor feel bound to join in the pursuit last Saturday, when the mob passed you at the corner of Court street?
31424	Do you feel bound, of a pleasant evening, to walk about in the neighborhood and see what fugitives you can find and dispose of?
31424	Does the Commissioner also rule that the Government need not show that the man arrested was the man claimed, and that the man rescued was Shadrach?
31424	Has it come to this?
31424	Have they got you?"
31424	He said,"Why?"
31424	How can the man''s admission that his name is Shadrach affect us?
31424	How is this extraordinary spectacle to be accounted for?
31424	I said to him--"What, have they rescued the man?"
31424	If such evidence is sufficient, who can be safe?
31424	If this is not so, what is the result?
31424	Is a man to be bound by statements of others?
31424	Is not a Southern man to go into a United States Court?
31424	Lunt._ Can you say that none of those who acted as counsel here, spoke of it?
31424	Lunt._ Did you attend the meetings at Faneuil Hall in October, relating to the Fugitive Slave Bill?
31424	Lunt._ Did you hear Mr. Davis testify the other day, if so, what did he say?
31424	Lunt._ Did you speak at that meeting?
31424	Lunt._ Does the Commissioner mean to rule in that testimony?
31424	Lunt._ Is Mr. Davis often at the office of the Commonwealth?
31424	Lunt._ Now with whom is he associated?
31424	Lunt_ here put the question,--Do you approve of the rescue?
31424	Lunt_--Are you one of the editors of the Commonwealth?
31424	Marsh._ Soon after Mr. Davis came in and sat down, he rose, coming towards me, and asked who Mr. Clark was, whether he was a southern man?
31424	Mr. Davis meets Mr. Riley in the morning, upon which, after an inquiry whether he has seen Mr. Curtis, he asked if he has a slave case?
31424	Mr. Riley, you did n''t know that the person you arrested was the man named in the original warrant and complaint, as the slave of Debree?
31424	Now what were the grounds in general, on which the warrant was issued?
31424	Now, may it please your Honor, how long and when was Prescott at that post?
31424	On what principles of proof is the judgment to be made up?
31424	Take from us that great argument, and what can the defendant and myself do?
31424	The only witness to this is Prescott; and how does he stand?
31424	The question here is, has a law of the United States been violated?
31424	Up to this point, what is the evidence against Mr. Davis?
31424	Was he counsel?
31424	We might well ask, what if this were Mr. Davis?
31424	What can the defendant say to discourage colored men from the use of force?
31424	What does it prove?
31424	What evidence has there been of any of these facts?
31424	What is the evidence?
31424	What next?
31424	What other evidence can there be of counsel''s authority?
31424	What single thing did he do as counsel?
31424	What then is the predicament in which Prescott has involved himself?
31424	What was he waiting for?
31424	Where is the remedy?
31424	Who passed this law?
31424	Who, Mr. Commissioner, is the defendant, at the bar?
31424	Why did n''t he publicly disclaim any assent to these proceedings?
31424	Why do you volunteer in it?
31424	Why is it that the defendant stands here at this bar a prisoner?
31424	Why should the criminal proceedings of this day have taken place at all?
31424	Why was Mr. Riley warned?
31424	Why?
31424	Would any compensation tempt you to do it?
31424	_ Cross Examined._ Who have you heard speak of it?
31424	_ Mr Dana._--For what purpose this narrative to be read here?
31424	_ The Commissioner._ Did you know him to be engaged in his legal duties?
31424	_ The Commissioner._ Do you contradict your return?
31424	_ The Commissioner._ Why did n''t you report the remark of Mr. Davis to the Commissioner?
10401	Daniel,he said, addressing me by my Christian name,"what are you doing here?
10401	In what position is the prisoner placed by the evidence? 10401 Who is this man?
10401	_ District Attorney_.--What newspaper is that from which the counsel reads? 10401 And does not this open a plain path for this prisoner out of the danger of this prosecution? 10401 And how did the slaves behave after they were captured? 10401 And, looking at those facts, is it necessary for me to open my lips in reply? 10401 Are you going to presume that the chickens run into his bag of their own accord, and without his agency? 10401 Are you to presume that the horse came to him of its own accord? 10401 Because the people in another land have arisen and triumphed over the despot, who had done-- what? 10401 But shall this prisoner be allowed to take advantage of his own wrong? 10401 But was not the vessel chartered in Philadelphia to carry off negroes? 10401 By what second- sight are you to look into this void space and time, and to say that Drayton enticed them to go on board? 10401 Can any man be a patriot who pursues such a course? 10401 Can you, without any evidence, say that Drayton enticed them, and that by no other means could they come onboard? 10401 Did he not know they were slaves? 10401 Did he, or not? 10401 Did not that show his authority over them,--that the slaves were under his control, and that he was the master- spirit? 10401 Do n''t you think he ought to? 10401 Do they get up a debate in Congress, and a riot in the city of Washington, every time a theft is committed or attempted in the District? 10401 Does that look as if he seduced them? 10401 For what have we rejoiced? 10401 Has he done anything to take this case out of the transportation statute, and to convert it into a case of stealing? 10401 Has the District Attorney, with all his zeal, pointed out a single particle of evidence of that sort? 10401 He came here from Philadelphia for them; they are found on board his vessel; Drayton says he would steal a negro if he could; is not that enough? 10401 He chartered the vessel to carry off negroes; and, if they were free negroes, or he supposed them to be, how was he to realize an independent fortune? 10401 How can you ask me to abandon it, and thus become a party to my own degradation? 10401 How is he introduced to the jury by his Philadelphia friends? 10401 If he had employers, who were they? 10401 If his confessions are to be taken at all, they are to be taken together; and do they not tend to prove such a state of facts? 10401 If they had been running away, would they not have been downcast and disheartened? 10401 Is he an enlightened friend of freedom, or even a judicious friend of those with whom he affects to sympathize, who adopts such a course? 10401 Is there any crowd or excitement here? 10401 It was all very well for the prisoner''s counsel to smooth things over; but was I, instead of calling him a liar, to say, he told a fib? 10401 Might not somebody else have done it? 10401 Might they not have gone without being enticed at all? 10401 Now, he can not be guilty of both; and which of these offences, if either, does the evidence against him prove? 10401 Now, is it the only possible means of accounting for the presence of Houver''s slaves on board to suppose that this prisoner enticed them? 10401 Now, what is possession of a slave? 10401 Now, which of these two acts is proved against this prisoner? 10401 Shall the record of this trial go forth to the world showing that you have found a fact of which there was no evidence? 10401 The question for you is, Does the evidence in this case bring the prisoner within the law as laid down by the court? 10401 The real question in this case was, Which had I done? 10401 The whole question in this case is, Were these slaves stolen, or were they running away with the prisoner''s assistance? 10401 The wood was a blind; besides he lied about it;--would he have ever come back to collect his note? 10401 There was the fact of their being under the hatches, concealed in the hold of the vessel,--did not that prove he meant to steal them? 10401 We now ask a categorical answer,--Will you remove your press? 10401 We now ask of you, Shall this be done? 10401 Were not these slaves found in Drayton''s possession, and did n''t he admit that he took them? 10401 When I call him a thief and a felon, do I go beyond the charge of the grand jury in the indictment? 10401 Where can the government produce positive testimony to the taking? 10401 Where is the least evidence that the prisoner seduced these slaves, and induced them to leave their masters? 10401 Who does not know that such men are, practically, the worst enemies of the slaves? 10401 Why discuss, when they can not act? 10401 Why first lay down an abstract principle, which they intend to violate in practice? 10401 Why had not these black people, so anxious to escape from their masters, as good a light to their liberty as I had to mine? 10401 Why say he knew he should end his days in a penitentiary? 10401 Why say he took them for gain, if he did not steal them? 10401 Why say if he got off with the negroes he should have realized an independent fortune? 10401 Why so, if the negroes were not slaves? 10401 Why, then, this sudden feeling in his behalf? 10401 Will not these wailings of anguish reach the ears of the Most High? 10401 Would not they have said, Now we are taken? 10401 Would they not exhaust the law- books to find the severest punishment? 10401 You are to look at the evidence; and where is the evidence that the prisoner seduced and enticed these slaves? 15752 But,"said the man who had lost and who held the horse,"the bridle certainly belongs to me, he does not take the bridle, does he?"
15752	How big was the sack?
15752	How much have you been paid for the decision?
15752	My dear Mr. Peck,I said,"will you trust me for two weeks''board?"
15752	What did the motion that Judge Terry made with his right hand indicate to you?
15752	What is this, Lake?
15752	And if so, why should the punishment be less?
15752	And was it not so in this case?
15752	As I entered he looked up and said,"Why, Judge, you do n''t look well, what is the matter?"
15752	As soon as I said this the owner of the bridle turned to his adversary and said,"What will you take for the horse?"
15752	Aspinwall replied,"But I do n''t know anything about your onions and potatoes; how should I?
15752	Broderick?"
15752	Can I help you?"
15752	Can the authority of the United States for the protection of their officers be less than their authority to protect their property?
15752	Customer:"What was done about it?"
15752	Did Judge Turner give any directions to the sheriff to arrest Judge Haun, notwithstanding he was holding his court?
15752	Did Mr. Field, in consequence of the order of Judge Turner, leave the court- room in company with the deputy sheriff?
15752	Did the Court of Sessions of Yuba County hold a session on that day?
15752	Did you continue in the District Court or did you go to the Court of Sessions?
15752	Did you spurn the wretch away who made a corrupt proposal to you, or did you hold counsel, sweet counsel with him?
15752	Do n''t you think it is a large knife?"
15752	Do you realize the fact, my dear Judge, that more than a quarter of a century has elapsed since these events transpired?
15752	Every one in greeting me, said"It is a glorious country,"or"Is n''t it a glorious country?"
15752	Field was fined by Judge Turner and ordered to be imprisoned?
15752	Has Mr. Field or Mr. Mulford ever been restored to the bar by the District Court since the order of expulsion on the 10th of June?
15752	Has that order ever been vacated on the records of the District Court?
15752	He replied,"What is it that worries you?"
15752	How then?
15752	How was he to be punished?
15752	I asked,"Why not?"
15752	I hurried back to the saloon; and as the jurors were standing about chatting with each other I exclaimed,"How is this?
15752	I replied,"But, suppose a man puts his name down and afterwards do n''t want the lots?"
15752	If this be not so, in the language of the Supreme Court,"Why do we have marshals at all?"
15752	Just at this moment Mr. Rodman M. Price, formerly Governor of New Jersey, made his appearance and exclaimed,"How is this?
15752	Mr. Wigginton said that Mrs. Terry asked her husband what he could do, and he replied, showing more feeling than he had before:"Do?
15752	Mrs. Terry took a third seat from him, and seeing him, said:"What, are you in this car too?"
15752	Shall it be said that Justice Field ought to have gone to the nearest justice of the peace and obsequiously begged to have Terry placed under bonds?
15752	She repeated her question:"Are you going to take the responsibility of ordering me to deliver up that contract?"
15752	Then, after a short pause, I remarked,"What is the case against your prisoner?
15752	Turning to me he said,"You say it is all right?"
15752	Was the order entered on the records of the District Court, expelling Messrs. Field, Goodwin, and Mulford?
15752	Was the trial of Cameron against Sutter proceeded with after Mr. Field left?
15752	Were any directions given about a posse?
15752	Were any members of the bar expelled by Judge Turner on that day?
15752	Were you in court on the 10th day of June?
15752	What day was that order entered?
15752	What useful functions can they perform in the economy of the National Government?
15752	What value would there be to a title in one man, with a right of invasion in the whole world?
15752	What was to be done with the prisoner?
15752	What, then, would your court do?
15752	When you had removed the cover you raised the lid slightly, but in a moment said to me,"What is this, Lake?
15752	Who can say that her spirit was not then hovering over him and whispering caution in his ear?
15752	Who knows but that a mother''s prayer for the protection of her son, breathed years before, was answered then?
15752	Who made up the records of the Court of Sessions on that day?
15752	Who took the place of Mr. Field after he left?
15752	You have sent Turner where there are only grizzly bears and Indians; why not let him remain there?
15752	or"Did you ever see a more glorious country?"
15752	you have not had your cigars?
40400	Is it likely, Sir, that, if this system of government is rejected, a better will be framed and adopted? 40400 Need I call to your remembrance the_ contrasted_ scenes of which we have been witnesses?
40400	Shall I become more particular still? 40400 What is the nature and kind of that government which has been proposed for the United States by the late Convention?
40400	Wherein, then, lies the danger? 40400 ''What can be your reasons?'' 40400 ''Why will you not? 40400 ''Why?'' 40400 A natural and very important question now presents itself,--Is such the situation, are such the circumstances, of the United States? 40400 But how were these to be maintained without money? 40400 But if your fears are in danger of being realized, can not certain provisos in the ordinance guard against the evil? 40400 But in what mode were they to be made? 40400 But whatever the consequence may be, are we to lie supine? 40400 By what standard were they to be ascertained? 40400 Can we borrow money? 40400 Can we do any thing to procure us dignity, or to preserve peace and tranquillity? 40400 Can we perform a single national act? 40400 Can we provide for their welfare or happiness? 40400 Can we raise an army? 40400 Can we reasonably expect, however ardently we may wish, to behold the glorious union? 40400 Can we relieve the distress of our citizens? 40400 Could they rely on the militia? 40400 Did our citizens lose their perseverance and magnanimity? 40400 Did they become insensible of resentment and indignation at any high- handed attempt that might have been made to injure or enslave them? 40400 Does representation prevail in the legislative department of the British government? 40400 Have these ideas been realized? 40400 Have those expectations been realized? 40400 How can the common force be exerted, if the power of collecting it be put in weak, foolish, and unsteady hands? 40400 If a better could be obtained at a future time, is there any thing wrong in this? 40400 In this situation, what was to be done? 40400 Is the executive power of Great Britain founded on representation? 40400 Is there any power of the United States that can_ command_ a single shilling? 40400 Is there now a government among us that can do a single act that a national government ought to do? 40400 May not this be done without opposition, at least effectual opposition, in the present situation of our country? 40400 Rather than defer longer a free and liberal system of trade with Spain, why not agree to the exclusion of the Mississippi? 40400 Suppose we reject this system of government; what will be the consequence? 40400 The great men who composed our first council,--are they dead, have they deserted the cause, or what has become of them? 40400 What arguments alleged in support either of the evidences or the right? 40400 What has been the cause? 40400 What is the cause? 40400 What subject, in the whole range of human thought and human endeavor, could be more complex than this? 40400 What was the consequence? 40400 What were those rights? 40400 What, then, has been the cause? 40400 Where does this power reside? 40400 Where will it meet a man so experienced in military affairs, one so renowned for patriotism, conduct, and courage? 40400 Which of these systems ought to have been formed by the Convention? 40400 Who has so great a knowledge of the enemy we have to deal with? 40400 Who so much respected by the soldiery? 40400 Who so well acquainted with their situation and strength? 40400 Who, in short, so able to support the military character of Virginia? 40400 Why, then, should we prematurely urge a matter which is displeasing, and may produce disagreeable consequences, if it is our interest to let it sleep? 40400 With what propriety can we hope our flag will be respected, while we have not a single gun to fire in its defence? 40400 Would it be proper to divide the United States into two or more confederacies? 40400 Would it be reasonable in us to hope for more easy terms, who have so recently assumed our rank among the nations? 40400 Yet what evidences of that right have been produced? 40400 Yet, on the same ground, we may ask what of these elevated thoughts was new, or can be affirmed never before to have entered the conceptions of man? 40400 [ 249] The serious question recurred,--what was to be done? 40400 and How is it to be remedied? 41095 12. with the amendment to it proposed& entered on the 15 instant, as called for by Col. Mason be now taken up? 41095 Above all shall that man be above it, who can commit the most extensive injustice? 41095 And would any one pretend that such a right tended to blend& confound powers that ought to be separately exercised? 41095 Are all laws whatever to be brought up? 41095 Are not the States y^e Agents? 41095 Are not they to ratify its proceedings? 41095 Are they men? 41095 Are they property? 41095 Are they to be excluded? 41095 Besides in what mode& proportion are they to vote in the Council of Revision? 41095 Besides who is to impeach? 41095 Can it be supposed that this vast Country including the Western territory will 150 years hence remain one nation? 41095 Can no better establish^t be devised? 41095 Can one man be trusted better than all the others if they all agree? 41095 Can there be a more fruitful source of dispute, or a kind of dispute more difficult to be settled? 41095 Did they not appoint this Convention? 41095 Does no other kind of property but land evidence a common interest in the proprietor? 41095 For What then are all the sacrifices to be made? 41095 From such an assembly can a perfect production be expected? 41095 Gen^l Pinkney asked whether no troops were ever to be raised untill an attack should be made on us? 41095 How shall the freehold be defined? 41095 How was a Convention to be formed? 41095 How was redress to be obtained in case duties should be laid beyond the purpose expressed? 41095 If he is to be the Guardian of the people let him be appointed by the people? 41095 If the new Constitution then violates the faith pledged to any description of people will not the makers of it, will not the States, be the violaters? 41095 Is he to have a military force for the purpose, or to have the command of the Militia, the only existing force that can be applied to that use? 41095 Is it meant to require a greater proportion of votes? 41095 Is it to be presumed that the people will ever agree to such a system? 41095 Is no road nor bridge to be established without the Sanction of the General Legislature? 41095 Is the smallest as well as the largest debtor to be excluded? 41095 Is this reasonable? 41095 Is this the case?
41095	M^r King asked what was the precise meaning of_ direct_ taxation?
41095	M^r Madison, will it not be sufficient to prohibit the making them a_ tender_?
41095	Of whom was it to consist?
41095	On 2^d part shall the Electors be chosen by the State Legislatures?
41095	On the question Shall he be ineligible a 2^d time?
41095	On the question Shall the Executive continue for 7 years?
41095	On the question for 6 years?
41095	On the question shall the vice President be ex officio President of the Senate?
41095	On y^e Question, Shall the Executive be removable on impeachments& c.?
41095	Ought not every man who pays a tax, to vote for the representative who is to levy& dispose of his money?
41095	Shall Vermont be reduced by force in favor of the States claiming it?
41095	Shall all the States then be bound to defend each;& shall each be at liberty to introduce a weakness which will render defence more difficult?
41095	Shall any man be above Justice?
41095	The question as moved by M^r Elseworth being divided, on the 1^{st} part shall y^e Nat^l Executive be appointed by Electors?
41095	To whom have Cong^s applied on subsequent occasions for further powers?
41095	Upon what principle is it that the slaves shall be computed in the representation?
41095	Was he to promote the establishment of a plan which he verily believed would end in Tyranny?
41095	Was the Executive to hold his place during good behaviour?
41095	Was this a proper model for us?
41095	Was this qualification restrained to freeholders?
41095	What are the great objects of the Gen^l System?
41095	What danger could there be in giving a controuling power to the Nat^l Legislature?
41095	What effect will this have?
41095	What is the extent of the term"disability"and who is to be the judge of it?
41095	What is the language of Reason on this subject?
41095	What is to be the remedy?
41095	What led to the appointment of this Convention?
41095	What might have been the consequence of such a regulation at the commencement, or even in the Course of the late contest for our liberties?
41095	What obligation then can the small States be under to concur ag^{st} their judgments in reinstating the section?
41095	What was the objection to this?
41095	What was the practice before this in cases where the Chief Magistrate rendered himself obnoxious?
41095	Wherein then lay the dangerous tendency of the innovations to establish an aristocracy in the Senate?
41095	Whither then must we resort?
41095	Who are to form the New Constitution by which the condition of that class of citizens is to be made worse than the other class?
41095	Who will be the best Judges whether these appointments be well made?
41095	Who would rely on a fair decision from three individuals if two had an interest in the case opposed to the rights of the third?
41095	Why is the provision restrained to Treason& bribery only?
41095	Why should they be restrained from checking the extravagance of the other House?
41095	Why then is no other property included?
41095	Why then prohibit bills of credit?
41095	Why?
41095	Will not the new Constitution be their Act?
41095	Will such men be the secure& faithful guardians of liberty?
41095	Will the former be so in case of a universal& equal suffrage?
41095	Will the latter be so in case of a suffrage confined to the holders of property?
41095	Will they not be the members of it?
41095	With these difficulties in his mind, what course he asked was he to pursue?
41095	Would this be the case, if the Executive should be impeachable?
41095	by what rule decide?
41095	what the force of its acts?
36188	Did he do this? 36188 Did you find anything at the close of it that you did not like?
36188	From what source did the Military Commission** derive their authority?
36188	Mr. Bingham( interrupting).--And not crimes? 36188 Mr. Bradley: And offered it once and withdrew it?
36188	Q.--Do you know Mr. Weichman? 36188 Q.--Do you remember any occasion-- some dinner occasion?
36188	Q.--I understood you to say that it was a subject of general conversation among the rebel officers? 36188 Q.--Were you in Carroll prison with him?
36188	Who will dare to say that in the time of civil war no person shall be deprived of life, liberty and property, without due process of law? 36188 : Conspiracy, Murder, Attempt at murder, Lying in wait? 36188 Again we ask why? 36188 And now what shall be said as to this taking of human life? 36188 And what shall we say of William H. Seward? 36188 But does it? 36188 But we ask what reason had theGreat War Minister""to perpetrate so pitiless an outrage?"
36188	But where was Booth?
36188	But who remains in the room, meets with the Court and participates in its secret and solemn deliberations?
36188	But why was the resurrection delayed until February, 1873?
36188	Could the fatuity of folly farther go?
36188	Did you find at the end of the record a recommendation to mercy in the case of Mrs. Surratt that the President never saw?
36188	Does this mean that Speed was an unseen spectator of the confidential interview, and witnessed the writing of the death- warrant?
36188	Ewing.--Do you base it, then, only on the law of nations?
36188	Ewing.--I should like an answer to my question, if it is to be given: How many crimes are my clients charged with and being tried for?
36188	Ewing.--Is that all the answer to the question?
36188	Ewing.--Or whether they are charged with four distinct crimes in this one charge?
36188	How?
36188	If the sick President did not carefully scrutinize the papers, was that the Judge- Advocate''s fault?
36188	In the meantime, the city, and even the whole country to its very borders, were agitated by the question: What is to be the fate of Mrs. Surratt?
36188	Is it so?"
36188	Is she too ironed?
36188	Is this in truth a sufficient explanation?
36188	Johnson.--Is the opinion here to which the objection refers?
36188	Johnson.--May I ask who the member of the Court is that makes that objection?
36188	Maintaining the most rigorous allegiance to the simple unadulterated truth, what can be said?
36188	The Shylocks of the days of arbitrary power dropped their sharpened knives and ejaculated,"Is that the law?"
36188	The grand question still remains, Was the judgment just?
36188	The only question about it which could any longer agitate the people was, had it been suppressed?
36188	WAS IT NOT MURDER?
36188	Was She Ironed?
36188	Was it not Murder?
36188	Was it to forestall a last possible effort of reckless and suicidal despair?
36188	What are we to think of the complaint of a Union General, that"a rebel party"fired( first?
36188	What conceivable motive, we ask again, to invent such a story-- so easy of refutation, so ruinous to himself, if refuted?
36188	What in Mars''name did this warrior expect?
36188	What more could the successor of the murdered Lincoln want?
36188	When he bearded the President in his Cabinet?
36188	When he defied him in the War Department, and scattered his missive of removal to the winds?
36188	When was he taken with it?
36188	Where can we look in the history of the world for a parallel to such a spectacle?
36188	Where now was the redoubtable Bingham who, over and over again, had assured the Commission he guided of the unmistakable guilt of all these persons?
36188	Who but Recorder Joseph Holt, the head of the Bureau of Military Justice, the left hand of Stanton as Baker was his right?
36188	Who gives to the Court the jurisdiction to decide upon the moral character of the counsel who may appear before them?
36188	Who makes them the arbiters of the public morality and professional morality?
36188	Why consult his confidential advisers after he had decided the whole matter?
36188	Why did he not at that crisis come forward with the proof of which the Judge- Advocate was so dreadfully in need?
36188	Why did he not"make public"what Seward had told him, while Seward was living?
36188	Why did n''t you bring it in?
36188	Why did n''t you put that record in evidence, and let us have it here?"
36188	Why did not his former assistant even relieve his tremendous anxiety by telling him that he had evidence which would blow the calumny into the air?
36188	Why may he not have been bad enough to suppress the recommendation?
36188	Why should Bingham have obeyed the"advice,"even if given by Stanton so long before?
36188	Why should he not have kept back the timorous suggestion of five officers, who were so soft- hearted as to"discriminate"as to sex?
36188	Why, then, do we hear nothing from Judge Bingham for three years more?
36188	but that when"it became his duty as an officer to fire upon a rebel party"the rebel party fired) back?
36188	e._, the Rebellion) he entered into it to aid it, did he not?"
36188	where Atzerodt?
36188	where Herold?
18637	[ 1] Another leveled a similar criticism at the entire amendment;What is meant by the terms excessive bail?
18637	''If he decides against the treaty, to whom is a nation to appeal?''
18637	*** But are we all, on that account, at the mercy of the legislative majorities?
18637	*** Commerce among the States must, of necessity, be commerce[ within?]
18637	*** The inquiry is,"wrote Justice Washington,"what are the privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States?
18637	And why may not the products of the field be brought within the principle?
18637	But can the Court stop at this point?
18637	But how was this done?
18637	But is its scope the same?
18637	Can it be doubted that Congress has power to repeal at any time the protection which present legislation affords organized labor?
18637	Can we establish a constitutional doctrine which forbids the elected representatives of the people to make this choice?
18637	Can we hold that the First Amendment deprives Congress of what it deemed necessary for the Government''s protection?
18637	Does the Fourteenth Amendment Incorporate the Bill of Rights?
18637	Effect of the Oath Does the oath add anything to the President''s powers?
18637	He says:"Can we then say that the judgment Congress exercised was denied it by the Constitution?
18637	How as to the converse situation?
18637	How does''released time''operate in Champaign?
18637	How is this practice to be squared with the express words of the Constitution?
18637	How is this vast proliferation of cases, and attendant expansion of the Court''s constitutional jurisdiction, to be explained?
18637	IS ANY IMMUNITY LEFT THE STATES?
18637	If a committee departs so far from its domain[ as?]
18637	If hitherto, why not henceforth?
18637	Is everybody out of step but this Court?
18637	Is it impaired by the acts under which the defendant holds?
18637	Is that such a violation of contracts as is prohibited by the Constitution of the United States?
18637	Is this contract protected by the Constitution of the United States?
18637	MYERS CASE VERSUS HUMPHREY CASE How does this issue stand today?
18637	May not the House of Representatives impeach the President for such refusal?
18637	Second, assuming an affirmative answer to the above question, is Congress under constitutional obligation to supply such implementation?
18637	Should, on the other hand, the adolescent mind be put at the mercy of the uninhibited reading tastes of an elderly federal judge?
18637	THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF A CIVILIAN OFFICER Is the Commander in Chiefship a military or civilian office in the contemplation of the Constitution?
18637	To the question:"What is the law which governs an army invading an enemy''s country?"
18637	Was the same principle expected to apply to the power over foreign and interstate commerce?
18637	What could be more irrational?
18637	What is it that is to be regulated?
18637	What is the liberty which that clause underwrites?
18637	What is understood by excessive fines?
18637	What powers are implied from this duty?
18637	What, then, are the outstanding differences between such conditional prohibitions of commerce and that with which this rà © sumà © deals?
18637	When does this happen?
18637	Whence, however, comes this law?
18637	Who are to be the judges?
18637	Would[ not?]
18637	[ 1587] How is it as to judicial decisions?
18637	[ 164] WHEN IS A TREATY SELF- EXECUTING?
18637	[ 1650] The Right to Reserve: When Limited.--Is the right which is reserved by a State to"amend"or"alter"a charter without restriction?
18637	[ 218] A little later he raises the question,"But how are competing interests to be assessed?"
18637	[ 341] A FORMAL OR A FORMATIVE POWER?
18637	[ 44] OATH OF OFFICE What is the time relationship between a President''s assumption of office and his taking the oath?
18637	in"9 Stat., 428, 432- 433"and removed question mark in"Grand Depository of the Democratic Principle"?
18637	or could he be fined or taxed for doing so?
18637	the strange spectacle be offered to the public world of an attempt by this court to arrest proceedings in that court?
31425	A Government which can make white men slaves?
31425	And does such a case constitute a rule of decision for this court-- a case to be followed by this court?
31425	And how does the power of Congress stand west of the Mississippi river?
31425	And if it was intended to secure these rights only to citizens of the United States, how has the Constitution here described such persons?
31425	And what law of slavery does either take with him to the Territory?
31425	And why not?
31425	But if we are to turn our attention to the dark ages of the world, why confine our view to colored slavery?
31425	But what court has not changed its opinions?
31425	But where there is no such law, can the master control the will of the slave by force?
31425	But why are the African race, born in the State, not permitted to share in one of the highest duties of the citizen?
31425	But, how is the case different on the return of the plaintiff to the State of Missouri?
31425	By virtue of what law is it, that a master may take his slave into free territory, and exact from him the duties of a slave?
31425	Can Congress determine the condition and_ status_ of persons who inhabit the Territories?
31425	Can anything be more despotic?"
31425	Can the master sell him?
31425	Could the plaintiff contract a lawful marriage there?
31425	Did the Constitution of the United States deprive them or their descendants of citizenship?
31425	Does not the master assent to the law, when he places himself under it in a free State?
31425	Does the master carry with him the law of the State from which he removes into the Territory?
31425	Does this legislation deprive him of his property without due process of law?
31425	For who, it may be asked, is a citizen?
31425	Had the Circuit Court of the United States jurisdiction to hear and determine the case between these parties?
31425	Has it empowered Congress to enact what free persons, born within the several States, shall or shall not be citizens of the United States?
31425	Has the law of Illinois any greater force within the jurisdiction of Missouri, than the laws of the latter within that of the former?
31425	Has this impressive lesson of practical wisdom become lost to the present generation?
31425	Have the people of either any right to disturb the relations of the other?
31425	How do we read the Constitution?
31425	If a State court may do this, on a question involving the liberty of a human being, what protection do the laws afford?
31425	If it be assigned to a man from a free State, may he coerce the slave by virtue of it?
31425	If it be said to be those laws respecting slavery which existed in the particular State from which each slave last came, what an anomaly is this?
31425	If it had jurisdiction, is the judgment it has given erroneous or not?
31425	If not, how can a similar regulation respecting a Territory violate the fifth amendment of the Constitution?
31425	If so, what becomes of the laws prohibiting the slave trade?
31425	If there be doubt, what rule of construction has been established in the slave States?
31425	If they were not, is Scott himself free by reason of his removal to Rock Island, in the State of Illinois, as stated in the above admissions?
31425	If, then, this clause does contain a power to legislate respecting the territory, what are the limits of that power?
31425	In selecting those who are to enjoy these national rights of citizenship, how are they described?
31425	In view of these facts, let us inquire how the question stands by the terms of the Constitution, aside from the treaty?
31425	In what does the distinction consist?
31425	Is it not a practical instrument?
31425	Is it personal or real property?
31425	Is it transferable?
31425	Is she bound to recognise and enforce the law of Illinois?
31425	Is there less comity existing between State and State, or State and Territory, than exists between the despotic Governments of Europe?"
31425	May it be negotiated, as a promissory note or bill of exchange?
31425	Moreover, if the right exists, what are its limits, and what are its conditions?
31425	Mr. Sloan:"Can anything be more repugnant to the principles of just government?
31425	On the decease of the master, does the slave descend to his heirs as property?
31425	Or is it an indefinable fragment of sovereignty, which every person carries with him from his late domicil?
31425	Shall we not cherish and maintain it?
31425	Suppose a slave escape from a Territory where slavery is not authorized by law, can he be reclaimed?
31425	The first is, what was the law of the Territory into which the master and slave went, respecting the relation between them?
31425	The remaining question for consideration is, What is the law of the State of Missouri on this subject?
31425	This is the agreed case; and can it be inferred from this that Scott and family returned to Missouri voluntarily?
31425	Thus Chief Justice Marshall( in United States_ v._ Bevans, 3 Wheat., 386) says:"What, then, is the extent of jurisdiction which a State possesses?
31425	Under such a jurisdiction, may the colored man be levied on as the property of his master by a creditor?
31425	Upon what principle, then, can it be denied to the State of Missouri?
31425	Was he, together with his family, free in Missouri by reason of the stay in the territory of the United States hereinbefore mentioned?
31425	What can be more conclusive than this?
31425	What do the character and_ status_ of citizen import?
31425	What gives the master the right to control the will of his slave?
31425	What is the law of Missouri in such a case?
31425	What judge has not changed his?
31425	What shall this thing be denominated?
31425	When the military force of the Union shall conquer a country, may not Congress provide for the government of such country?
31425	Why was he set free in Illinois?
31425	Will it be said that the slave is taken as property, the same as other property which the master may own?
31425	and does that enable him to coerce his slave in the Territory?
5268	A hundred?
5268	Ah, stop is it? 5268 Ah, ye objec'', do ye?"
5268	Anybody have good hosses in this town?
5268	Are you acquainted with the accused or his family?
5268	But how? 5268 But may it not be a similar one and not your own?"
5268	By the way,said the friend,"do you ever hear of any''touches''up the river or along the Sound?"
5268	Did you ever remove this terrible poison from the bolster?
5268	Did you hear your chief witness say he was a carpenter?
5268	Do you admit that you were on Forty- second Street at midnight?
5268	Do you say, Mrs.--the lawyer would inquire deferentially,"that you heard the sound of three blows?"
5268	Eighty?
5268	Fifty?
5268	Gentlemen of the jury, have you agreed upon a verdict?
5268	Have you ever changed the bolster?
5268	How do you support yourself?
5268	How much did you give him?
5268	How much did you give him?
5268	How say you, do you find the defendant guilty or not guilty?
5268	I am quite sure that it is mine:"How do you know?
5268	I suppose you have heard the report that Deacon Smith has stolen the church funds?
5268	Is he? 5268 Is that dead on the level?"
5268	Madam,he began courteously,"you say you gave the defendant money?"
5268	Mr. District Attorney,remarked the presiding justice dryly( which did not lessen the confusion of the young lawyer),"is this a fact?
5268	Presumed to be innocent?
5268	Seventy?
5268	Then it''s there yet?
5268	Twenty miles an hour?
5268	Well, why did n''t you say so?
5268	What do you mean?
5268	What sort of a feller is he?
5268	When was it?
5268	Why do you ask?
5268	Why should I?
5268	Will you say it was going forty?
5268	Will you say it was going thirty miles an hour?
5268	Would you say that it was going at ten miles an hour?
5268	* Is it likely that any judge would have done much better?
5268	And is not this a"government of laws"?
5268	And what is the meaning of that?
5268	Anything particularly undignified about that?"
5268	Are not the rights of a beggar as sacred as those of a bishop?
5268	But suppose in addition that these theoretic rights are entirely theoretic and fly in the face of the laws of nature, experience, and common sense?
5268	Deacon Smith after the money- bag?
5268	Do n''t you know So- and- So is under my protection?"
5268	Do not the jury and everybody else know that this good old man would never, save by mistake, accuse anybody falsely of crime?
5268	Do they really presume him innocent?
5268	Do you think I care what this jury does?
5268	Dodge?"
5268	Does n''t he owe a duty to the public the same as any other witness?
5268	Does not the law say so?
5268	Does she look like a guilty woman?
5268	Does such a practice make for justice?
5268	Does the judge expect that they are actually to swallow that?
5268	Dough?"
5268	Else would I have married an old crone who could not have borne me children?
5268	First, how can the sympathies of the jury be enlisted at the very start?
5268	For example:"Do you know the defendant?"
5268	Has the defendant a license?"
5268	He drew from his pocket a folded paper and handed it to the paralyzed young attorney with the harsh demand:"What do you say to that?"
5268	How about the killings where the murderer is never caught?
5268	How could I keep my self- respect and write that kind of sensational stuff-- Why do men kill?
5268	How many readers of this paper have ever experienced an actual desire to kill another human being?
5268	I am not guilty of thoo dedys, ne noon of hem, God help me so.... How wylte thou acquite the?...
5268	If a defendant intends to prove himself irresponsible for his offence, why should he not be compelled to enter a specific plea to that effect?
5268	If such be the case, did he know right from wrong as applied to the particular act in question?
5268	If they could beat a case in which they had already pleaded guilty, what could they not do where the evidence was less obvious?
5268	If we come climbing over the fence sweating apples at every pore, is Farmer Jones to go and count his apples before grabbing us?
5268	If we knew why, maybe we could stop it, could n''t we?
5268	Is it any wonder that so many cases are sold out by employees, even when the agencies are honest?"
5268	Is it possible to deduce any order out of such homicidal chaos?
5268	Logically, why should not a person charged with a crime be obliged to give what explanation he can of the affair?
5268	Meantime Jim''ll be out makin''money to pay me my fee-- won''t you, Jim?
5268	Now why did HE kill?
5268	One of the ladies referred to testified as follows:"Can you identify that diamond?"
5268	Or"How old are you?"
5268	Question 3.--"In what terms ought the question to be left to the jury as to the prisoner''s state of mind when the act was committed?
5268	Question 4:--"If a person under an insane delusion as to existing facts commits an offence in consequence thereof, is he thereby excused?
5268	S''pose we are convicted?
5268	So you plead guilty, do you?
5268	Supposing I dug out all the homicide cases I had ever tried, what would the result show as to motive for the killing?
5268	The quaint old report begins in Latin, but"the pleadings"are set forth in the language of the day, as follows:"Agnes Archer, is that thy name?
5268	The writer remembers being nicely hoisted by his own petard on a similar occasion:"What do you do for a living?"
5268	What OTHER motives had the defendants at the bar had?
5268	What are the celebrated cases-- the trials that attract the attention and interest of the public?
5268	What are you doing?
5268	What can be done about it?
5268	What did these judges mean by know?
5268	What does his liberty amount to or his much- vaunted legal rights if the city is to be made safe?
5268	What does the ordinary juryman mean by it?
5268	What does the reader mean by know?
5268	What generally occurs?
5268	What good does the presumption of innocence, so called, do for the miserable Robinson?
5268	What is the use?
5268	What must have been the effect on the court officers, the witnesses, the defendants out on bail, the complainants, the spectators?
5268	What then?
5268	What was the use of trying to do good work any longer?
5268	Where were they now-- and why did they kill-- yes, why DID they?
5268	Where will you seek it?
5268	Who shall say how many embryonic law- breakers took courage at the story and started upon an experimental attempt at crime?
5268	Why Do Men Kill?
5268	Why did he?
5268	Why do men drink?
5268	Why do men eat?
5268	Why do men love?
5268	Why not?
5268	Why should he have the privilege of silence?
5268	Why, may I ask?
5268	Why, the jury argued, should the lawyer object unless the making of such a forgery were in fact an easy matter?
5268	Would drink and women account for seventy- five per cent?
5268	Yes, better for whom?
5268	Yet how far does the element of sex defeat the ends of justice?
5268	Yet who shall say that, in spite of the fact that it is a theoretic outrage upon liberty, this cleaning out of the city is not highly desirable?
5268	Yet why does not some apostle of liberty raise his voice and cry aloud concerning the wrong that has been done?
5268	You shake your head?
5268	yells the prosecutor, jumping to his feet and shaking his fist at him,"do you want to be taken for a d-- n liar?
26446	Clark''s negro?
26446	Clark''s?
26446	Master''s Death?
26446	Phoebe more Poison?
26446	Rand''s Cato for any Poison?
26446	_ Ansr._ Yes, and that was it which I gave to Phillis_ Quest._ When did you go over to get the last Poison?
26446	_ Answr._ I[t?]
26446	_ Answr._ There was a White Powder in the Vial, which Sunk to the Bottom of it.--_ Quest._ Do you know who put the Powder into the Vial?
26446	_ Q._ What Doctor?
26446	_ Q._ What did you do with them?
26446	_ Q._ What sort of Poison was that?
26446	_ Q._ What was he poisoned with?
26446	_ Q._ When& where did Robbin give you that Powder?
26446	_ Q:_ Were they together when they told you So?
26446	_ Qu._ Did Robbin give you any Directions how to use that Powder, and tell you what Effect it would have?
26446	_ Qu._ Did you give her the whole of the Powder you had of Robbin the first Time?
26446	_ Qu._ Did you pay Robbin any Thing for these Powders?
26446	_ Qu._ Did you tell her how she must use the Powder?
26446	_ Qu._ Did you tell her what was in the Paper?
26446	_ Qu._ Do you know whether she used that Powder or any Part of it?
26446	_ Qu._ How long ago was it Since Robbin gave you the first of these Powders?
26446	_ Qu._ How long before was it?
26446	_ Qu._ How many Times had you such Powder of Robbin?
26446	_ Qu._ Was any Body there when you gave it to her?
26446	_ Qu._ Was it before Robbin& you were together at John Harris ye Potters Work house?
26446	_ Qu._ Was there any Person present with you when Robbin gave you that Powder?
26446	_ Qu._ What did Robbin give you these Powders for?
26446	_ Qu._ What did she do with it?
26446	_ Qu._ What did she do with it?
26446	_ Qu._ What did she tell you to get?
26446	_ Qu._ When was the last Time you had any such Powder of him?
26446	_ Qu._ When& where did you give Phoebe the first Paper of that Powder?
26446	_ Qu._ When& where did you give that Paper of Powder to Phillis?
26446	_ Qu._ Where was it you had this last Powder of him, and what was it in?
26446	_ Qu._ Who did you give the Second Paper of Powder to?
26446	_ Qu:_ How was your Master poisoned with these Powders?
26446	_ Qu:_ When did they tell you this?
26446	_ Quest._ After you had parted with him when you came thro''the Entry, did you call him back?
26446	_ Quest._ Are you a Servant or Freeman?
26446	_ Quest._ Did Robbin know of it?
26446	_ Quest._ Did any body see you take it from her?
26446	_ Quest._ Did he ever afterwards propose the poisoning his sd Master?
26446	_ Quest._ Did you ever apply to any body else, besides Robbin for Poison?
26446	_ Quest._ Did you ever ask Carr at any other Time for Poison?
26446	_ Quest._ Did you get her any more of Robbin?
26446	_ Quest._ Did you never ask him for something to Poison or kill a Dog?
26446	_ Quest._ Did you put all that Powder into the Vial?
26446	_ Quest._ Did you see Robbin at Charlstown in the Time of your master''s sickness or about the Time of his Death?
26446	_ Quest._ Did you see him eat that Chocalate?
26446	_ Quest._ Did you tell Carr that Phoebe sent you for that Poison you applyed to him for?
26446	_ Quest._ Did you then go with them to the Ferry or nearer to it than your master''s House?
26446	_ Quest._ Did your master drink the Infusion after that water was so pour''d in?
26446	_ Quest._ Did your master that Day forbid Mrs Shearman''s letting you have any more Drink?
26446	_ Quest._ Do you know any Thing more of your master''s being poisoned than you have before related?
26446	_ Quest._ Do you know he was poisoned?
26446	_ Quest._ Do you know how your Master''s Work house that was burnt down came on Fire?
26446	_ Quest._ Do you know of any Copperas or Green stuff being provided for that Purpose?
26446	_ Quest._ Do you know of any Cushoe nuts being procured for that Purpose?
26446	_ Quest._ Do you know of any Proposal made of poisoning your master?
26446	_ Quest._ Do you know of any more Powder being got to give to your master?
26446	_ Quest._ Do you know of any other Poison prepar''d for, or given to your Master?
26446	_ Quest._ Do you know that any of the Water that was in the Vial after you put this last Powder in was given to your Master?
26446	_ Quest._ Do you know that any other Poison besides the Potter''s Lead was given to your sd master?
26446	_ Quest._ Do you know where Mark got that Powder which he gave to you?
26446	_ Quest._ Had you any Discourse with Robbin in private or between you and him alone that Day?
26446	_ Quest._ Had your Master any of that Water which was put into the said Vial given to him?
26446	_ Quest._ How came it on fire?
26446	_ Quest._ How came that Viall buried near your Forge in the Black- Smith''s Shop, that you told Mr. Kettell of, and he found there?
26446	_ Quest._ How did you Set your Master''s Work House on fire?
26446	_ Quest._ How do you know it?
26446	_ Quest._ How do you know that Mark had that Powder of Robbin?
26446	_ Quest._ How do you know that Mark put any of the Potter''s Lead into the Sagoe?
26446	_ Quest._ How do you know that Phoebe poured any of the poisoned Water out of the Vial into your Master''s Chocalate?
26446	_ Quest._ How do you know that, that Water was Poison?
26446	_ Quest._ How long was you his Servant?
26446	_ Quest._ How long was you his servant?
26446	_ Quest._ How long was you with Robbin at Mr. Harris''s Work house?
26446	_ Quest._ How many Times was any of that Water, which was in the Vial aforesd., put into your master''s victuals?
26446	_ Quest._ How much Powder was there in the Paper?
26446	_ Quest._ How was it given to him?
26446	_ Quest._ Was any Body concern''d in the burning the Work house besides Mark and you?
26446	_ Quest._ Was it before or after your Master eat that Chocalate that the poison''d Water was pour''d into, that She told you so?
26446	_ Quest._ Was there no Discourse had between you Phoebe& Phillis about getting more Poison, after you had the first, of Robbin?
26446	_ Quest._ Was you ever bit by a Dog?
26446	_ Quest._ What Reason have you to be satisfyed it was Robbin?
26446	_ Quest._ What Sort of Powder was it that Mark gave You?
26446	_ Quest._ What did he do with it?
26446	_ Quest._ What did you do with that Powder which Mark gave you?
26446	_ Quest._ What did you get that Lead for?
26446	_ Quest._ What is your name?
26446	_ Quest._ What was he poisoned with?
26446	_ Quest._ What was it in?
26446	_ Quest._ What was it?
26446	_ Quest._ What was the Powder in when Phoebe gave it you?
26446	_ Quest._ When did she tell you so?
26446	_ Quest._ When did you bury it there?
26446	_ Quest._ When did you get that powder''d Lead of Essex?
26446	_ Quest._ When was it that Mark first proposed the poisoning his Master?
26446	_ Quest._ When was the first Time?
26446	_ Quest._ Where did you all go after you drank the Toddy?
26446	_ Quest._ Where did you drink the Toddy?
26446	_ Quest._ Where did you get that Powder?
26446	_ Quest._ Where did you get that Vial?
26446	_ Quest._ Where was Phoebe& Mark when you put the Coal of Fire into the Shavings?
26446	_ Quest._ Where was the Vial when you talked with Phoebe as aforesd?
26446	_ Quest._ Who first proposed the Setting the Workhouse on fire?
26446	_ Quest._ Who got this last Powder?
26446	_ Quest._ Who pour''d it into his barly Drink?
26446	_ Quest._ Who pour''d the Water out of the Vial into the Infusion?
26446	_ Quest._ Who poured the Water out of the sd Vial into the Chocalate?
26446	_ Quest._ Who put the Second Powder into the Vial?
26446	_ Quest._ Who put the Shavings there?
26446	_ Quest._ Who was it that first contrived the poisoning your Master Codman?
26446	_ Quest._ Why did you bury the Vial before you called Pompy?
26446	_ Quest._ Why did you not tell your Master or some of the Family that Phoebe had poisoned the Chocalate, and thereby prevent your Master''s eating it?
26446	_ Quest._ Why did you, when Phoebe pour''d Some of the Water out of the Vial into the Chocalate tell her,"her hand was heavy?"
26446	_ Quest._ what black Lead is it you mean?
26446	_ Questn._ Do you know of what sickness your said master died?
26446	_ Questn._ Have you lately had any Potters powder''d Lead by you or in your Possession?
26446	_ Quet._ Do you know that any Part of that Lead you had of Essex or any Lead like unto it was given to your master or put into his Victuals or Drink?
26446	_ Quet._ What Reason did Mark give for poisoning his Master?
26446	and what reason was given for doing it?
26446	following--_ Questn._ Was Mr. John Codman late of Charlstown de[=c]d, your Master?
26446	master dyed to think that the Powders you had of Robbin were given to your master or that he was poison''d therewith?
26446	master was poisoned with that Lead?
26446	of Robbin the Second Time?
26446	or shew it to any body?
26446	or what Effect it would have?
26446	that askt for Mark was Robbin or not?
38103	You have?
38103	_ Can the mind conceive of more horrid blasphemy?_Is not that true?
38103	_ Can the mind conceive of more horrid blasphemy?_Is not that true?
38103	_ Or the word of God,--_What is that?
38103	_ The bible- God says that his people made him jealous"Provoked him to anger._Is that true?
38103	All at once there arose a man called Martin Luther, and what did the dear old Catholics think?
38103	And are they the"merciful"who when some man endeavors to answer their argument, put him in the penitentiary?
38103	And do you know that we ought to feel under the greatest obligation to men who have fought the prevailing notions of their day?
38103	And has a man that right?
38103	And how are you going to keep from having more?
38103	And is it possible that a work written by an infinite being has to be protected by a legislature?
38103	And suppose he does not believe in any bible whatever?
38103	And what does that mean?
38103	And what else says the defendant?
38103	And what else?
38103	And what else?
38103	And what has been the result?
38103	And what is it to reap that field?
38103	And what of that?
38103	And wherever such laws have been enforced, have the people been friends?
38103	And why?
38103	And why?
38103	Any harm in saying that?
38103	Are they holy?
38103	Are we any nearer thinking alike to- day than we were then?
38103	Are we not all children of the same Mother?
38103	Are we not all compelled to think, whether we wish to or not?
38103	Can any man have the egotism to say that he has found it all out?
38103	Can anything be plainer-- anything more forcibly stated?
38103	Can you help thinking as you do?
38103	Can you imagine an infinitely good God sending a man to hell because he did not believe the bear story?
38103	Could it now, by any possibility, make a man a good father, a good husband, a good citizen?
38103	Could you pour contempt on Shakespeare by saying that his mother was a woman,--by saying that he was once a poor crying little helpless child?
38103	Did anybody ever dream of passing a law to protect Shakespeare from being laughed at?
38103	Did anybody ever think of such a thing?
38103	Did anybody ever want any legislative enactment to keep people from holding Robert Burns in contempt?
38103	Did he know he would drown them when he made them?
38103	Did he know they ought to be drowned when they were made?
38103	Did he not, if the bible is true, drown the people?
38103	Did the prosecution have the courage to attack his reputation?
38103	Did they succeed?
38103	Did you ever know of a more despicable fraud practiced by one brother on another than Jacob practiced on Esau?
38103	Do you believe that?
38103	Do you know that all the mechanics that ever lived-- take the best ones-- cannot make two clocks that will run exactly alike one hour, one minute?
38103	Do you not see what the effect will be?
38103	Does he help the poor?
38103	Does he like to lock somebody up in the penitentiary because he has the power of the moment?
38103	Does he need assistance from New Jersey?
38103	Does he pay his debts?
38103	Does he tell the truth?
38103	Does he want to crush his fellow citizens?
38103	Does he wish to use it as a despot, or as a philanthropist-- like a devil, or like a man?
38103	Does it make any difference whether you believe it or not?
38103	Does it, or does it not?
38103	Does that cast any scorn or contempt upon him?
38103	Does the bible describe God as having drowned the whole world with the exception of eight people?
38103	For what sum of money, for what amount of wealth, would the world have the science of Astronomy expunged from the brain of man?
38103	Gentlemen, does not that show the need of more missionaries?
38103	Had they the public weal at heart, or were they simply endeavoring to be revenged upon this defendant?
38103	Has he got a heart that melts when he hears grief''s story?
38103	Has he the right to be sincere?
38103	Has he the right to say it, if he believes it?
38103	Has he the right to show that Martin Luther said he did not believe there was one solitary word of gospel in the Epistle to the Romans?
38103	Has he the right to show that some of these books were not written till nearly two hundred years afterwards?
38103	Has he the right to show that the book of Revelation got into the canon by one vote, and one only?
38103	Has he the right to show that there were twenty- eight books called"The Books of the Hebrews?"
38103	Has he the right to show that they passed in convention upon what books they would put in and what they would not?
38103	Has he the right to show that?
38103	Have you a right to think about it at all?
38103	Have you not the right to read, to observe, to investigate-- and when you have so read and so investigated, have you not the right to reap that field?
38103	Have you produced a new argument?
38103	He goes so far as to say, that"_ He was found staring foolishly at his own little toes._"And why not?
38103	Honestly-- what do you think they would say?
38103	How are you going to judge him?
38103	How did they come to crucify him?
38103	How did they happen to have it, and how did you happen to be deprived of it?
38103	How do you know what such men are mentioned for?
38103	How does he use power?
38103	How else?
38103	How has the church in every age, when in authority, defended itself?
38103	I do not say whether this is true or not, but has a man the right to say it if he believes it?
38103	I have given you my definition of blasphemy, and now the question arises, what is worship?
38103	If God be infinitely good and wise and powerful, is it possible he is afraid of anything?
38103	If it is true, is it blasphemous?
38103	If others claim the right, where did they get it?
38103	If this statute is constitutional, why has it been allowed to sleep for all these years?
38103	If what the defendant has said is blasphemy under this statute then the question arises, is the statute in accordance with the Constitution?
38103	If you have the right to work with your hands and to gather the harvest for yourself and your children, have you not a right to cultivate your brain?
38103	Is a man to be sent to the penitentiary for that?
38103	Is any statute needed to keep Euclid from being laughed at in this neighborhood?
38103	Is he convinced?
38103	Is it any harm to speak of it?
38103	Is it blasphemous to deny that God commanded his children to murder each other?
38103	Is it blasphemous to say that he was benevolent, merciful and just?
38103	Is it blasphemy to ask that question?
38103	Is it blasphemy to deny that a God of infinite love gave such commandments?
38103	Is it blasphemy to quote from the"Sacred Scriptures?"
38103	Is it blasphemy to say that Solomon was not a virtuous man, or that David was an adulterer?
38103	Is it blasphemy to say that you do not like a hypocrite, a murderer, or a thief, because his name is in the bible?
38103	Is it blasphemy to tell the truth and to say exactly what David was?
38103	Is it likely that a being of infinite wisdom would deliberately do what he knew he must undo?
38103	Is it necessary to believe that?
38103	Is it possible that Christians will break the peace?
38103	Is it possible that a book can not be written by a God so that it will not excite the laughter of the human race?
38103	Is it possible that a good and wise God, knowing that he was going to drown them, made millions of people?
38103	Is it possible that they will violate the law?
38103	Is it probable that Christians will congregate together and make a mob, simply because a man has given an opinion against their religion?
38103	Is not that an absurd and foolish statute?
38103	Is such a denial calculated to pour contempt and scorn upon the God of the Orthodox?
38103	Is that of any importance?
38103	Is that the Christian religion?
38103	Is that the Christian religion?
38103	Is that the doctrine?
38103	Is that the law?
38103	Is the god dead?
38103	Is there any blasphemy about that?
38103	Is there any evidence-- has there been any-- to show that the defendant was not absolutely candid in the expression of his opinions?
38103	Is there anything blasphemous in that?
38103	Is there anything in this that is blasphemous?
38103	Is there one particle of evidence tending to show that he is not a perfectly honest and sincere man?
38103	Is this blasphemy?
38103	Is this law constitutional, or is it simply an old statute that fell asleep, that was forgotten, that people simply failed to repeal?
38103	Is this statute in harmony with that part of the Constitution of 1844 which says:"The liberty of speech shall not be abridged?"
38103	Must a man be honest?
38103	Now gentlemen, what is blasphemy?
38103	Now how should we treat a new thought?
38103	Now is it not a fact that the Old Testament does uphold polygamy?
38103	Now is there any blasphemy in saying that the bible is true?
38103	Now what has a man the right to say about that?
38103	Ought I to clap my hand over my mouth and start for another State, and the minute I got over the line say,"It is not true, It is not true?"
38103	Ought an honest man to be sent to the penitentiary for simply telling the truth?
38103	Should you express that thought?
38103	Suppose a man believes that, and practices it, does it make any difference whether he believes in the flood or not?
38103	Suppose the defendant in this case were guilty of something like that?
38103	The defendant is also charged with having said that"_ God cried and screamed._"Why not?
38103	The first question for you, gentlemen, to decide in this case is: Is this statute constitutional?
38103	The songs of Burns will be sung as long as there is love in the human heart Do we need to protect him from ridicule by a statute?
38103	Then what has happened?
38103	Then what have they cursed?
38103	Then what would the Turks do?
38103	Then what would the Turks say?
38103	They would put the Morristown missionary in jail, and he would send home word, and then what would the people of Morris- town say?
38103	Was he a good man?
38103	Was not the world exactly as God made it?
38103	Well what is it?
38103	Well, the great question about that is, is it true?
38103	Well, what is the Christian religion?
38103	Were most of them as guilty of blasphemy as is the defendant in this case?
38103	Were they actuated by good and noble motives?
38103	Were they willing to disgrace the State, in order that they might punish him?
38103	What did he make them for?
38103	What does it mean?
38103	What does it mean?
38103	What else did the savage suppose?
38103	What for?
38103	What harm can come from an honest interchange of thought?
38103	What if God did cry?
38103	What is blasphemy?
38103	What is holy?
38103	What is prayer?
38103	What is real blasphemy?
38103	What is real religion?
38103	What is sacred?
38103	What is the use of telling a falsehood about it?
38103	What is their religion?
38103	What of it?
38103	What right has he?
38103	What was the spirit of our government at that time?
38103	What were the reasons given?
38103	What were their opinions?
38103	What would I do?
38103	What would I not give for a picture of Shakespeare as a babe,--a picture that was a likeness,--rocked by his mother?
38103	When some poor mother is found wandering in the street with a babe at her breast, does he quote Scripture, or hunt for his pocket- book?
38103	Where did a church or a nation get that right?
38103	Where would we have been if authority had always triumphed?
38103	Where would we have been if such statutes had always been carried out?
38103	Where, then, is the blasphemy in saying so?
38103	Whether a man built an ark or not-- does that make the slightest difference?
38103	Who are the men who are leading the race upward and shedding light in the intellectual world?
38103	Who is a worshipper?
38103	Who is to blame?
38103	Who obtained this indictment?
38103	Who were they?
38103	Why did he make your brain so that you could not by any possibility be a Methodist?
38103	Why did he make yours so that you could not be a Catholic?
38103	Why did he not do so?
38103	Why has it been allowed to slumber?
38103	Why kick him?
38103	Why not?
38103	Why not?
38103	Why should not each human being have the right, so far as thought and its expression are concerned, of all the world?
38103	Why should we fear our fellow- men?
38103	Why, whoever did, since the poor man, or the poor God, was crucified?
38103	Why?
38103	Why?
38103	Why?
38103	Why?
38103	Why?
38103	Will they succeed?
38103	You can hardly imagine that there was a time when the same kind of men that made this law said to another man:"You say this world is round?"
38103	You may not agree with these men-- and what does that prove?
38103	You say:"Take a chair; are you thirsty, are you hungry, will you not break bread with me?"
38103	You will get your revenge on him through all eternity-- is not that enough?
40861	Shall the clause allowing each State one vote in the 2^d branch, stand as part of the Report,?
40861	Suppose the first branch granted money, may not the second branch, from state views, counteract the first? 40861 Will the representatives of a state forget state interests?
40861	2. was it probable that the States would adopt& ratify a scheme, which they had never authorized us to propose?
40861	A House of Nobles was essential to such a Gov^t could these be created by a breath, or by a stroke of the pen?
40861	A discretion must be left on one side or the other?
40861	Again What use may be made of such a privilege in case of great emergency?
40861	And have we now forgotten that powerful friend?
40861	And if a sparrow can not fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid?
40861	And is it not a clear principle that in a free Gov^t those who are to be the objects of a Gov^t ought to influence the operations of it?
40861	Are gentlemen in earnest when they suppose that this exclusion will prevent the first characters from coming forward?
40861	Are not the Citizens of Pen^a equal to those of N. Jersey?
40861	Are not the large States evidently seeking to aggrandize themselves at the expense of the small?
40861	Are the distinction of Patrician& Plebeian known among us?
40861	Are the large States less attached to their existence more likely to commit suicide, than the small?
40861	Are the people of the three large States more aristocratic than those of the small ones?
40861	Are they admitted as Citizens?
40861	Are they efficient States?
40861	Are they in the hands of the few who may be called rich; in the possession of less than a hundred citizens?
40861	Are we not struck at seeing the luxury and venality which has already crept in among us?
40861	Are we to suspend the business until the deputies arrive?
40861	Ask any man if he confides in Cong^s if he confides in the State of Pen^a if he will lend his money or enter into contract?
40861	Besides shall the best, the most able, the most virtuous citizens not be permitted to hold offices?
40861	Besides, How can it be thought that the proposed negative can be exercised?
40861	But are there any exceptions of this sort to the Articles of Confederation?
40861	But does it follow that an equality of votes is necessary for the purpose?
40861	But is this a Republican Gov^t, it will be asked?
40861	But reverse the case, and leave the whole at the mercy of each part, and will not the general interest be continually sacrificed to local interests?
40861	But whatever might have been y^e cause, was not in effect the vote of one State doubled, and the influence of another increased by it?
40861	But why so?
40861	But will it be more so in one plan than the other?
40861	But will such a plan be adopted out of doors?
40861	By the vote already taken, will not the temper of the state legislatures transfuse itself into the Senate?
40861	Can the military habits& manners of Sparta be resembled to our habits& manners?
40861	Can we forget for whom we are forming a Government?
40861	Can you always rely on the patriotism of the members?
40861	Could the national resources, if exerted to the utmost enforce a national decree ag^{st} Mass^{ts} abetted perhaps by several of her neighbours?
40861	Did any such common interest exist?
40861	Do gentlemen mean to pave the way to hereditary Monarchy?
40861	Do the people at large complain of Cong^s?
40861	Do they flatter themselves that the people will ever consent to such an innovation?
40861	Do we create a free government?"
40861	Does the scheme of N. Jersey produce this effect?
40861	Does this doctrine result from the nature of compacts?
40861	From the Monied interest?
40861	From the landed interest?
40861	Give the large States an influence in proportion to their magnitude, and what will be the consequence?
40861	Has Holland or Switzerland ever complained of the equality of the states which compose their respective confederacies?
40861	Has a man in Virg^a a number of votes in proportion to the number of his slaves?
40861	Has it less dignity?
40861	Has it not been the real or supposed interest of the major number?
40861	Has not Mass^{ts}, notwithstanding, the most powerful member of the Union, already raised a body of troops?
40861	Have not the boroughs however held fast their constitutional rights?
40861	Have they not been dictated by interest, by ambition?
40861	He asks M^r S. whether the State at this time dare impose& collect a tax on y^e people?
40861	His question was how is the power of the 1^{st} branch increased or that of the 2^d diminished by giving the proposed privilege to the former?
40861	How can these be filled?
40861	How could this be taken from them by a_ legislative_ ratification only?
40861	How is the danger in all cases of interested coalitions to oppress the minority to be guarded ag^{st}?
40861	How is this danger to be guarded ag^{st} on the republican principles?
40861	How strongly will it feel its importance and self- sufficiency?
40861	If a proportional representation be right, why do we not vote so here?
40861	If as wealth, then why is no other wealth but slaves included?
40861	If danger be apprehended from the Executive what a left- handed way is this of obviating it?
40861	If such a meeting of the people was actually to take place, would the slaves vote?
40861	If the Representatives of the people would be bound by the ties he had mentioned, what need was there of a Senate?
40861	In return he would ask will the people adopt the other plan?
40861	In the present deranged State of our finances can so expensive a System be seriously thought of?
40861	Is a real& fair majority, the natural hot- bed of aristocracy?
40861	Is it a novel thing that the few should have a check on the many?
40861	Is it because the laws are to operate immediately on their persons& properties?
40861	Is it because the representatives are chosen by the people themselves?
40861	Is it because, the larger have more at stake than the smaller?
40861	Is it conceivable that there will be leisure for such a task?
40861	Is it for_ men_, or for the imaginary beings called_ States_?
40861	Is it from an internal reform of their Gov^{ts}?
40861	Is it not the case in the British Constitution the wisdom of which so many gentlemen have united in applauding?
40861	Is it to spring from commerce?
40861	Is she not now augmenting them, without having even deigned to apprise Cong^s of Her intention?
40861	Is the National Legislature too to sit continually in order to revise the laws of the States?
40861	Is the Representation there less unequal?
40861	Is the old confederation dissolved, because some of the states wish a new confederation?"
40861	Is then the object of the Convention likely to be accomplished in this way?
40861	Is there no danger of a Legislative despotism?
40861	Is there no difference of interests, no rivalship of commerce, of manufactures?
40861	M^r Wilson, the question is shall the members of the 2^d branch be chosen by the Legislatures of the States?
40861	May not a Legislature filled by the State Legislatures operate on the people who chuse the State Legislatures?
40861	Might it not, on the other side be asked how the former was to be secured ag^{st} the latter?
40861	Might not such a mode of election be devised among ourselves as will defend the community ag^{st} these effects in any dangerous degree?
40861	On Question shall the words stand as part of the Report?
40861	Ought this merit to be made a disqualification?
40861	Shall all the laws of the States be sent up to the Gen^l Legislature before they shall be permitted to operate?
40861	Shall we effect the cure by establishing an equality of votes as is proposed?
40861	Shall we leave the States alone unprovided with the means for this purpose?
40861	Should the Executive Magistrate be taken from one of the large States would not the other two be thereby thrown into the scale with the other States?
40861	States at present groan?
40861	Take mankind as they are, and what are they governed by?
40861	The Swiss cantons have scarce any union at all, and have been more than once at war with one another.--How then are all these evils to be avoided?
40861	The first three or four years we might go on well enough; but what would be the case afterwards?
40861	The great question is what provision shall we make for the happiness of our Country?
40861	The true question was in what mode the best choice w^d be made?
40861	There being 5 ays, 4 noes,& 1 div^d, a question was asked whether a majority had voted in the Affirmative?
40861	They may even be under some foreign influence; are they in such case to participate in the negative on the will of the other States?
40861	To what standard will you resort?
40861	Under these ideas can it be expected that the people can approve the Virginia plan?
40861	Was a Combination to be apprehended from the mere circumstance of equality of size?
40861	Was not this remark as applicable to one branch of the Representation as to the other?
40861	Was such a remedy eligible?
40861	Were the large States formidable_ singly_ to their smaller neighbours?
40861	What Results?
40861	What danger is there that the whole will unnecessarily sacrifice a part?
40861	What has been the consequence?
40861	What has been the source of those unjust laws complained of among ourselves?
40861	What inducements can be offered that will suffice?
40861	What is the condition of the lesser states in the German Confederacy?
40861	What is the government now forming, over states or persons?
40861	What is the state of things in the lax system of the Dutch Confederacy?
40861	What is the true principle of Representation?
40861	What is this object?
40861	What is to be the check in the Senate?
40861	What motives are to restrain them?
40861	What must be the consequence?
40861	What of a Revisionary power?
40861	What qualities are necessary to constitute a check in this case?
40861	What reason can be assigned why the same rule of representation s^d not prevail in the 2^d branch as in the 1^{st}.?
40861	What remedy then?
40861	What then is to be done?
40861	What too is to become of our treaties-- what of our foreign debts, what of our domestic?
40861	What were the consequences?, first, enmity on our part, then actual separation.
40861	When the Tribunitial power had levelled the boundary between the_ patricians_&_ plebeians_, what followed?
40861	Whence does this proceed?
40861	Whence then is the national revenue to be drawn?
40861	Whence then the danger of aristocracy from their influence?
40861	Whence then the danger of monarchy?
40861	Where are the sources from whence it is to flow?
40861	Where do the people look at present for relief from the evils of which they complain?
40861	Where is the difference, in which branch it begins, if both must concur, in the end?
40861	Who then are to hold them?
40861	Why are Counties of the Same States represented in proportion to their numbers?
40861	Why s^d a Nat^l Gov^t be unpopular?
40861	Why was America so justly apprehensive of Parliamentary injustice?
40861	Why was it determined that the Judges should not hold their places by such a tenure?
40861	Why?
40861	Why?
40861	Why?
40861	Will a Citizen of_ Deleware_ be degraded by becoming a Citizen of the_ United States_?
40861	Will any one say this would ever be agreed to?
40861	Will it be the British Gov^t?
40861	Will it prevent encroachments on the federal authority?
40861	Will it prevent the violations of the law of nations& of Treaties which if not prevented must involve us in the calamities of foreign wars?
40861	Will it prevent trespasses of the States on each other?
40861	Will it secure a good internal legislation& administration to the particular States?
40861	Will it secure the internal tranquillity of the States themselves?
40861	Will not our Constituents say?
40861	Will not the same motives operate in America as elsewhere?
40861	Will our Executive be able to apply such a remedy?
40861	Will our honest Constituents be satisfied with metaphysical distinctions?
40861	Will she be represented in proportion to this amount?
40861	Will the members of the General Legislature be competent Judges?
40861	Will the militia march from one State to another, in order to collect the arrears of taxes from the delinquent members of the Republic?
40861	Will they maintain an army for this purpose?
40861	Will they, ought they to be satisfied with being told, that the one- third compose the greater number of States?
40861	Would 30 or 40, million of people submit their fortunes into the hands of a few thousands?
40861	Would American rights& interests have been safe under an authority thus constituted?
40861	Would she not be at the mercy of Pennsylvania?
40861	Would such a scheme be practicable?
40861	[ A][ A] Quere,?
40861	and which so far exceeded what they regarded as sufficient?
40861	are they admitted as property?
40861	does it afford any substantial remedy whatever?
40861	does it arise from any particular stipulation in the articles of Confederation?
40861	does it require 150 of the former to balance 50 of the latter?
40861	or do we imagine that we no longer need his assistance?
40861	then why are they not admitted on an equality with White Citizens?
40861	then why is not other property admitted into the computation?
40861	was it practicable?
40861	will each Citizen enjoy under it less liberty or protection?
40861	will it not be most safely lodged on the side of the Nat^l Gov^t?
36591	And was it that, which caused such roars and roars of laughter from the Trustees''room after I left?
36591	And we would also venture to inquire, what is the married woman''s protection under such a Statute law? 36591 But does not the constitution defend the right of religious tolerance to all American citizens?"
36591	Can I replevy it as stolen property?
36591	Could you forgive Mr. Packard, and live with him again as his wife?
36591	Did they?
36591	Do you think, Mrs. Packard, that your husband really believes you are an insane person?
36591	Husband,said I,"have not I a right to my opinion?"
36591	In what estimation is Mr. Packard held in the region where these scenes were enacted?
36591	Is he in this city?
36591	Is this so? 36591 O, husband,"said I,"you have allowed me no chance for my secret devotions this morning, ca n''t I be allowed this one last request?"
36591	Shall I add anything to it; that is, what I said to the Trustees, and so forth?
36591	Then,said I,"can I bear such trials as these without God''s help?
36591	What are your opinions, Mrs. Packard, which have caused all this rupture in your once happy family?
36591	What do you fear he will do?
36591	What does your printer say about it?
36591	Why not? 36591 Why, Mrs. Packard, do you not get a divorce?"
36591	Why, Mrs. Packard, what protection do you need? 36591 Why?"
36591	( One gentleman in the crowd turned to his wife and said,"Wife, were you ever out of bread, and had to make biscuit for dinner?
36591	*** And has God less power to execute his kind plans than I have?
36591	: religions toleration?
36591	Abandon her, turn her out upon the world without a morsel of bread, and no home?
36591	And again, how could they imagine, that a man would wish to have the reputation of having an insane wife, when he had not?
36591	And can one be prosecuted for doing a legal act?
36591	And can you blame me for this manifestation of my heart sympathy for my imprisoned sisters?
36591	And could the good and kind Mr. Packard neglect even his poor afflicted wife?
36591	And do n''t you think he is changing as fast as we can expect, considering his conservative organization?
36591	And do we not practically deny it, when we endorse the revolting doctrine of endless punishment?
36591	And does not this legalized despotism put our souls in jeopardy, as well as our bodies, and our children?
36591	And is a stagnant, torpid, and retrogressive state of mentality, a natural or an unnatural condition-- a sane, or an insane state?
36591	And is not that man a coward who can not stand before such artillery?
36591	And is not this help given us in answer to our own prayers?
36591	And is not this our petition for protection founded in justice and humanity?
36591	And must I?
36591	And shall I repine because I am called insane for the same reason?
36591	And so would any lady, would they not?
36591	And whose will was to be my guide, my husband''s will, or God''s will?
36591	And why should she not be legally protected from them as well as a man?
36591	Are not God''s simple, common sense teachings, authority enough for our opinions?
36591	Are you authorized to stop a man from doing a_ legal_ act?"
36591	But how could the Superintendent of the Insane Hospital be a party to so great a wrong?
36591	But how could this be done in my penniless condition?
36591	But how long do you think I had better make my visit?"
36591	But it is so tedious for me to copy anything, how would it do to get a few handbills or tracts printed, and send them where we please?"
36591	But just as she was leaving the house, the Doctor asked her, if she had any letter from Mrs. Packard to her children with her?
36591	But one thing more I wish your advice about; how can I keep the money I get for my book from Mr. Packard, the legal owner of it?"
36591	But where could the$ 3000.00 I have paid out for the expense of printing and circulating these books have been obtained?
36591	But you can get along without me, ca n''t you?
36591	But, as my Saviour said,"the cup which my Father hath given me, shall I not drink it?"
36591	But, in my opinion, Dr. McFarland, does not know a sane from an insane person; or else, why does he keep so many in that Asylum, as sane as himself?
36591	Can I ever believe that God loves his children less than I do mine?
36591	Can I not truly say my train of thought was engineered by the"Lightning Express?"
36591	Can facts be transmuted into fiction by the simple assertion of one man?
36591	Can she not even think her own thoughts, and speak her own words, unless her thoughts and expressions harmonize with those of her husband?
36591	Can testimony, however abundant, change this truth into a falsehood?
36591	Could Christ take upon himself our nature, and yet know no sin, if our natures are necessarily sinful?
36591	Could these defenceless States resort to any other means of self- defence from the usurpation of the powerful States than that of secession?
36591	Did not"wise men"make the laws, as he often used to assert they did?
36591	Did you give up, and neglect your duties?
36591	Did you injure any one?
36591	Did you tear your clothes, and destroy your things?
36591	Do not I always give you an exact account of every cent I spend?
36591	Do you think she would have come out unharmed?
36591	Does an upright course seek or desire concealment?
36591	For what is that love worth, that ca n''t defend its friend in adversity?
36591	Forgive us, wo n''t you, for our cruel neglect?"
36591	Gentlemen, we married women need emancipation; and will you not be the pioneer State in our Union, in woman''s emancipation?
36591	Has a married woman no identity in Statute Book of Illinois?"
36591	Has a married woman no rights at all?
36591	Have I ever abused this trust?
36591	Have we, on this account, any reason or right to call him insane?
36591	He then asked be"Have you had anything from Mrs. Packard with you?"
36591	He would often say to me,"Mrs. Packard, who are your friends?
36591	How was his sympathy manifested?)
36591	I say, why?
36591	I then said to my printer, supposing he should come with money, and offer to buy the manuscript, what then?"
36591	If Mr. Packard_ believed_ his wife to be hopelessly_ insane_, why did he abandon her?
36591	If so, why do they not look after you?"
36591	Is activity and progression in knowledge and intelligence, an indication of a sane, natural condition, or is it an unnatural, insane indication?
36591	Is he not a monomaniac?
36591	Is her conscience, and her reason, and her thoughts, all lost in him?
36591	Is it because a woman has no individuality, after she is joined to a man?
36591	Is not my persecutor guiltless in this matter?
36591	Is not this a pretty statute to be incorporated into our laws no more than thirteen years ago?
36591	Is that kind of treatment which causes insanity the best adapted to cure insanity?
36591	Is the wrong covered up?
36591	Is this the way to treat a companion afflicted with insanity?
36591	May I not be allowed, husband, to ask this favor of God_ alone_ in my room, before being thus exiled from it?"
36591	May I now bring it up?
36591	Mrs. Fisher, what can have tempted us ever to doubt this glorious truth?
36591	Mrs. Lovel, one of the patients, replied,"Mrs. De La Hay, did you ever have a straight jacket on yourself?"
36591	Now I would like to ask Dr. McFarland, where are to be found these"bonds of generous sympathy"to which he refers?
36591	Now comes the question: Is this a crime for which I ought to be divorced from all the comforts and privileges of my own dear home?
36591	Now what shall I do?
36591	Now, I ask, how many men would venture to get married under these laws?
36591	Now, I ask, is this so?
36591	Now, if the course he has taken with me is not insanity-- that is, an unreasonable course, I ask, what is insanity?
36591	Now, what could he do with twelve more such boxes?
36591	Or, in other words, is that kind of treatment which caused their insanity the best adapted to cure their insanity?
36591	Shall this vow be a witness against me, or shall it not?
36591	Should I be appropriating an unreasonable share of time, as a pupil, Mr. Smith, to occupy four minutes of your time in reading them?
36591	The great question with me is, how can I soonest earn the$ 2,500.00 necessary to print it with?
36591	The question may be asked, how this could happen, especially in Northern Illinois?
36591	The questions are often asked me,"Why were you sent here?
36591	The time- worn wigs, with error gray, Their dusty locks with pale dismay, Shall shake in vain in wild despair, To see their prostrate castles, where?
36591	The wise shall laugh-- the foolish cry-- Both wise and foolish virgins, why?
36591	Was it not that we had trained them to respect paternal authority?
36591	Was there ever such a case of heartlessness?
36591	Well, what did the"feelings"of the community have to do with the court and jury?
36591	What dangers do you apprehend?"
36591	What did you do that made your friends treat such a good woman so?"
36591	What have''the rulers in the church''done about the persecution?
36591	What more could he have had if the witness had been present?
36591	What shall I do, Doctor?"
36591	Why ca n''t the inalienable rights of the lawful wife be_ as much_ respected as those of the open prostitute?
36591	Why ca n''t the wife steal all the husband has?
36591	Why is this?
36591	Why is this?
36591	Why not confine the husband at the instance of the wife, as well as the wife at the instance of the husband?
36591	Why not?
36591	Why was this struggle with our consciences?
36591	Will you protect me here?"
36591	With shame I ask the question, does not our government here offer a premium on infidelity?
36591	Wo n''t you please stop this robbery of our inalienable right to our own property, by some law, dictated by some of your noble, manly hearts?
36591	Would he give a crazy woman money to go to the city, and make purchases for herself?
36591	Would not this state of the Union endanger the rights of the defenceless ones?
36591	Would they not be tempted to ignore the marriage laws of our woman government altogether?
36591	Would you have set down in the clothes you had worked in?
36591	Yes, Mr. Packard has only treated me as he said the laws of Illinois allowed him to do, and how can he be blamed then?
36591	You know I have_ always_ been a true and loving wife to you, and how can you treat me so?"
36591	_ Ques._ And did you think that was an evidence of insanity?
36591	_ Ques._ Are you much of a theologian?
36591	_ Ques._ Did she also include you?
36591	_ Ques._ Did she not show more familiarity with the subject of religion and the questions of theology, than you had with these subjects?
36591	_ Ques._ Do you believe Mrs. Packard was insane, and is insane?
36591	_ Ques._ Do you believe literally that Jonah was swallowed by a whale, and remained in its belly three days and was then cast up?
36591	_ Ques._ He had been charging her with insanity, had he not, at the table?
36591	_ Ques._ She called Mr. Packard the unfruitful works of darkness?
36591	_ Ques._ Then would you call yourself insane?
36591	_ Ques._ This was about the time that her husband was plotting to kidnap her, was it not?
36591	_ Ques._ Was not that a new idea to you in theology?
36591	_ Ques._ What else did she say or do there, that showed marks of insanity?
36591	_ Ques._ What would you have done under similar circumstances?
36591	_ Question._ Dr., what particular idea did she advance on the subject of religion that led you to the conclusion that she was hopelessly insane?
36591	_ Question._ Was it an indication of insanity that she wanted to leave the Presbyterian Church?
36591	_ Question._ What did she do then?
36591	_ Re- cross- examined._--_Question._ Did you deem that an evidence of insanity?
36591	and endanger the Union also?
36591	and what will the children do for their summer clothes without me to make them?"
36591	and when asked by his guests, who often mistook me for the matron,"why he kept so intelligent a lady in an Insane Asylum?"
36591	have you any in the wide world?
36591	if you or your darling daughter were in their places, would you feel like reproaching me as a fanatic, for thus volunteering in your defence?
36591	in the region of the west, or in the east?
36591	said I,"Can you get along without me three months?
36591	said I,"can you sleep while your wife is in such agony?"
36591	said I,"how can you leave me in such a place?
36591	the guilty party allowed to go unchallenged lest"the cause"suffer by exposure?
36591	where is he now?
36591	where is her only daughter, Elizabeth, of thirteen years, and her George Hastings, of ten years, and her darling baby, Arthur Dwight, of five years?
36591	will you not protect us from such liabilities?
31298	''Did I not tell thee that thou shouldst love thy neighbor as thyself? 31298 Again Baxter essayed to speak, and again Jeffreys bellowed,''Richard, Richard, dost thou think we will let thee poison the court?
31298	Do men mourn for him? 31298 Do n''t you remember the Union meeting held in this very hall?
31298	Do you take notice of that juryman dressed in blue?
31298	Have ye forgot, or never knew, That God will judge the judges too? 31298 I should like to ask,"he continued,"the reverend gentleman in what capacity he expects to be punished for his_ perjury_?"
31298	Is not every man_ secure in his life, liberty, and property? 31298 Judges who rule the world by laws, Will ye despise the righteous cause, When the injured poor before you stands?
31298	Mr. Muir might have known that_ no attention could be paid to such a rabble, what right had they to representation_? 31298 The fugitive has been a slave before: does the wrong you committed yesterday, give you a natural right to commit wrong afresh and continually?
31298	The law of New York allows even foreigners to go there with their slaves; and have the morals of that State suffered in consequence? 31298 The only question you are to determine is... Did Mr. Lyon publish the writing?...
31298	Where shall I find a parallel with men who will do such a deed,--do it in Boston? 31298 Who can fail to see that the government would cease to be a government if it were to yield obedience to those local opinions?
31298	Who put Slavery in the Constitution; made it Federal? 31298 Why is Boston in this confusion to- day?
31298	Will you accept for Law whatever the court declares such?
31298	[ 146] But Erskine without a Jury, Gentlemen, what could he have done? 31298 [ 190] Did he remember the fate of the Hebrew Judas, who"betrayed the Innocent Blood,"and then cast down the thirty pieces?
31298	[ 23] What followed? 31298 _ If the king will impose upon a man what he can not do, he must acquiesce_; but shall he come and fly in the face of his prince?
31298	''And what ailed the old blockhead then,''cried Jeffreys,''that he did not take it?''
31298	''Edward, where is thy brother, Anthony?''
31298	''Edward, where is thy brother, Anthony?''
31298	''He doth whatsoever pleaseth him;''''where the word of the King is there is power, and who may say unto him, What doest thou?''"
31298	''I know not; am I my brother''s keeper, Lord?''
31298	''Is Saul among the prophets?''
31298	A jury?
31298	According to the Judge the Jury had only one question before them,"Did Zenger publish the words charged in the information?"
31298	Against ME?
31298	And when that''Reverend gentleman''rose, and asked,''Do you want an answer to your question?''
31298	Another asked,"What is to be done?"
31298	Are honest men to take such talk for American law?
31298	Because we must sometimes do a disagreeable deed to accomplish an agreeable purpose?
31298	Because you enslaved this man''s father, have you a natural right to enslave his child?
31298	Boston merchants, where is your brother, Thomas Sims?
31298	But did it violate the law of 1790?
31298	But do you suppose I can keep the fugitive slave bill, obey these Judges, and kidnap my own Parishioners?
31298	But how should he be punished?
31298	But of what avail was all this before such a Commissioner?
31298	But they have a simple question of fact to determine; namely, Did the Defendant resist officer Butman in the manner set forth?
31298	But to what purpose?
31298	But where did Judge Curtis find his right to levy Ship- money, Tonnage, and Poundage on the tongues of men; where did he find his"law?"
31298	But where did Judge Parker, an estimable man, find his law?
31298	But why need I wander so far?
31298	By the"opinion"of the lawyers on either side?
31298	By what analogy, then, can we refuse the same justice in the most important cases, to the most important personages?
31298	By whom shall they"be delivered up?"
31298	Can any piece of parchment make right wrong, and wrong right?
31298	Can you understand his feelings?
31298	Cincinnati?--nay, at Boston?
31298	Dare ye condemn the righteous poor And let rich sinners''scape secure, While Gold and Greatness bribe your hands?
31298	Did I actually obstruct him?
31298	Did I do the deed charged, and obstruct Marshal Freeman while in the peace of the United States, and discharging his official duty?
31298	Did he attempt its immediate abolition?
31298	Did he cite the Bible?
31298	Did he denounce it?
31298	Did he do any thing, or say any thing which could in its remotest tendency encourage resistance and violence?
31298	Did he do so seditiously, with the intent of making odious or contemptible the President and government, and bringing them both into disrepute?"
31298	Did he manufacture Bible?
31298	Did he think I advised men to take an oath and break it?
31298	Did you never hear of a merchant evading the duties of the custom- house?
31298	Do you know_ who_ fired them?
31298	Do you think I can suffer Commissioner Curtis and Commissioner Loring to steal my friends,--out of my meeting- house?
31298	Do you think I doubt how you will choose?
31298	Does Mr. Webster suppose that such a law could be executed in Boston?
31298	Does he leave the spot?
31298	Does he restrain the negroes?
31298	Dost thou shudder?
31298	For God''s sake is that no libel?
31298	Gentlemen of the Jury, I rose and said,"Do you want an answer to your question, sir?"
31298	Gentlemen of the Jury, do you doubt what I say?
31298	Gentlemen, what do mankind say to such sophistry?
31298	Gentlemen, you will ask me where shall the jury find the Rule of Right, and how know what is just, what not?
31298	Had he no affection for Jesus?
31298	He had charged me with preaching murder and perjury; had asked, How I expected to be punished for my own"PERJURY?"
31298	He said:--"When did fear ever induce a man to relax his power over the object that excited it?
31298	Here is the question:"Ought the men who have done this deed against the form of Law to be punished thereby?"
31298	How came the Brother- in- law of the Judge on the Grand- Jury summoned to punish men who spoke against kidnapping?
31298	How could they think of it?
31298	How do you think he proved that?
31298	How does the juror judge of the Credibility of Evidence?
31298	How many banks are content with_ six per cent._ when money is scarce?
31298	I ask you, are we to have deeds as well as words?
31298	I asked the meeting,"Will you let him come back; how many will defend him to the worst?"
31298	I could not but ask,''Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
31298	If my interest is not shaken,_ what have I to do with matters of government_?
31298	If this be law, why do we talk of liberties?
31298	If this practice be so corrupting, why is it tolerated in other States?"...
31298	In Pennsylvania the law is similar, but where is the evidence of its pernicious influence?"
31298	In such a case,''what is to be done?''
31298	In the logic of legal deduction-- technical inference-- they forget the intuition of conscience: not What is right?
31298	Is it according to the Constitution of the United States-- its Purpose, its Means-- thus to punish such acts?
31298	Is it expedient in this particular case to apply this law, under the circumstances, to this man, and punish him with fine and imprisonment?
31298	Is it innocent in a lawyer to ask the court to do a wicked thing, to urge the court to do it?
31298	Is it just and right; that is according to the Natural Law of God, the Constitution of the Universe?
31298	Is not happiness in the power of every man?_''Does not every man sit safely under his own vine and fig- tree''and none shall make him afraid?"
31298	Is not happiness in the power of every man?_''Does not every man sit safely under his own vine and fig- tree''and none shall make him afraid?"
31298	Is not reparation to be made to the public for any injury which it may have sustained, as much as to an individual?
31298	Is not that enough?
31298	Is that bill Constitutional?
31298	Is that consistent with innocence?...
31298	Is that the doctrine of Young Massachusetts?
31298	Is the fugitive slave bill a Measure tending to that End?
31298	Is the welfare of the nation in general, of less consequence than that of a single person?
31298	Is there a law of the United States punishing this deed of mine?
31298	Is there a statute or custom denouncing a penalty on that special deed?
31298	Is this law just?
31298	Is this the liberty of Massachusetts?
31298	It is piracy to steal a man in Guinea; what is it to do this in Boston?
31298	MY defence?
31298	Mr. Charles P. Curtis thus sustained his kinsman:--"Is that to be considered immoral which the Court is bound to assist in doing?
31298	Mr. Hallett], to howl down the''Higher law,''and when he said, Will you have this to rule over you?
31298	Must Justice be appealed from?
31298	Need I mention the name of Americans with a similar history?
31298	New York?
31298	Or why support the unrighteous cause?
31298	Shall I never lift an arm to protect him?
31298	Shall I speak of that?
31298	Shall he say it is illegal?
31298	Shall that tongue be silenced; tied in Faneuil Hall; torn out by a Slave- hunter?
31298	Should he pray to Darius or pray to God?
31298	So in administering law the Judge is to ask, Is the statute constitutional?
31298	So the moral question,"Has the man done a wrong thing?"
31298	Suppose Daniel-- I mean the old Daniel, the prophet-- should have asked him, What is to be done?
31298	Symbolical court of the Fugitive Slave Bill-- it does not respect life, why should it death?
31298	That is does it coincide with the Law of God, the Constitution of the Universe?
31298	The actual question was, Has the king a right to imprison any subject forever without process of law?
31298	The one put to me in my official capacity as juror, is this:"Did Greatheart aid the woman?"
31298	The question is not merely, Shall the African be bond or free?
31298	The rest are-- what?
31298	The sacrifice of man to money, when shall it have an end?
31298	Then they are to ask, also,"Was the deed_ naturally wrong_; done from a wrong motive, for a wrong purpose?"
31298	Thus practically the judge left the jury only one thing to determine, Did Mr. Miller print Junius''s letter to the king?
31298	To a mob?
31298	To injustice?
31298	To whom?
31298	To whom?
31298	Was Marshal Freeman, at the time of the obstruction, in the peace of the United States, or was he himself violating the law thereof?
31298	Was there any effectual mode of securing to Mr. Burns his natural and unalienable Right except the mode of forcible rescue?
31298	Was there any illegal obstruction or opposition at all made to the Marshal?
31298	We are told that Elijah gathered the prophets together:''and he came unto all the people, and said, How long halt ye?
31298	Well, gentlemen, how do you think they received that declaration?
31298	What came of that last attempt of the last king of New England to establish a despotism here?
31298	What capitalist heeds your statute of usury when he can get illegal interest?
31298	What did your fathers do on that occasion?
31298	What do you think of a man who knows no lawgiver but the General Court of Massachusetts, or the American Congress: no Justice but the Statutes?
31298	What followed?
31298	What if it had been told Mayhew and Belknap, that in the pulpits of Boston, to defend kidnapping should be counted to a man as righteousness?
31298	What if the jury in 1735 had been faithless?
31298	What is a fine of a thousand dollars, and jailing for six months, to the liberty of a man?
31298	What may any man call his own, if not the Liberty of his Person?
31298	What shall we do?
31298	What took place at Philadelphia?
31298	What voice can plead for them before their own children?
31298	What was the Marshal legally, constitutionally, and justly doing at the time he was obstructed?
31298	When a man''s liberty is concerned, we must keep the law, must we?
31298	When he maketh inquisition for the blood of the innocent, what shall the stealers of men reply?
31298	When will ye once defend the poor, That sinners vex the Saints no more?
31298	Where are the Rights of Massachusetts?
31298	Where are the laws of Massachusetts forbidding State edifices to be used as prisons for the incarceration of fugitives?
31298	Where is Anthony, thy brother?
31298	Where is the one spot, that speck of foreign dirt in the clean American garden?
31298	Where is the sacred right of_ habeas corpus_?
31298	Where is the trial by jury?
31298	Where then is the propriety of making such a bustle about the malice or innocence of the intention?
31298	Whereto shall I look up for inspiring aid?
31298	Who are the persons"held to service or labor?"
31298	Who is meant by persons"held to service or labor?"
31298	Who were they?
31298	Why did not the court summon another jury, and the chief justice put his brother- in- law on it?
31298	Why do I say this?
31298	Why do I say, then, do not now resist with violence?
31298	Why do we trouble ourselves with a dispute about law, franchises, property of goods, and the like?
31298	Why dost thou turn pale, as when the crowd clutched at thy life in London Street?
31298	Why not?
31298	Why should we keep that odious law which makes us hated wherever justice is loved?
31298	Why will ye, then, frame wicked laws?
31298	Will you allow that to be done?
31298	Will you stand by and see your countrymen, your fellow- citizens of Boston, sent off to slavery by some commissioner?
31298	Will you tell me that I am a coward?
31298	Witnesses testified that Kline was so much addicted to falsehood that they would not believe him on oath,--but what of that?
31298	Would not that be a pretty spectacle?
31298	and the prince acts against prudence, honor, or conscience, and throw dirt in the king''s face?
31298	and, scorning liberty, why should it heed decorum?
31298	are we healed?
31298	betray the wanderer, and expose the outcast?
31298	but What is law?
31298	but, Shall America be a Democracy or a Despotism?
31298	by the judge''s"opinion,"or that of the community?
31298	by whom shall they"be delivered up on claim?"
31298	is not before them; only the mechanical question,"Did he do that particular act?"
31298	is taken from their consideration; the intellectual question,"Has he done a deed which amounts to the crime forbidden?"
31298	is the statute constitutional?
31298	so I say; but who is to blame?
31298	that the people of Massachusetts will ever return a single fugitive slave, under such an act as that?
31298	who adopted Slavery and volunteered to catch a runaway, in 1793, and repeated the act in 1850,--in defiance of all law, all precedent, all right?
31298	who carried it across the Mississippi-- into Louisiana, Florida, Texas, Utah, New Mexico?
31298	who established it in the Capital of the United States?
31298	who got new soil to plant it in?
31298	who put it in the new States?
58534	A hundred?
58534	Address?
58534	Ah, stop is it? 58534 Ah, ye objec'', do ye?"
58534	And that you fainted?
58534	And you want the teapot?
58534	Any questions?
58534	Are you quite sure?
58534	Are you sure?
58534	Are you the bondsman in this case?
58534	Are you the complainant?
58534	Back again?
58534	But how do you know, Silas?
58534	By the way,says Appleboy,"step up to Police Headquarters with me, will you, Pat?
58534	Did you fall?
58534	Did you steal Mr. Blickendecker''s eggs?
58534	Did you steal his teapot?
58534	Did you, about 4:49 P.M., onn Tueday, the 17th of April, observe the defendant near your place of business?
58534	Do yer know that man?
58534	Do you admit that you were on Forty- second Street at midnight?
58534	Do you desire counsel?
58534	Do you know of any reason to the contrary?
58534	Do you mind letting me have it then?
58534	Do you read the papers?
58534	Do you say, Mrs.----,the lawyer would inquire deferentially,"that you heard the sound of_ three_ blows?"
58534	Do you think I''d try the Smith case before----?
58534	Do you think you would make an absolutely fair and impartial juror?
58534	Easy, ai n''t it?
58534	Eighty?
58534	Fifty?
58534	Gentlemen of the jury, have you agreed upon a verdict?
58534	Gentlemen of the jury,said he,"have you agreed upon a verdict?"
58534	Guilty?
58534	Have n''t I worked for him for fourteen years?
58534	Have ye got a lawyer?
58534	Have you agreed upon a verdict?
58534	Hi, there, Rounds, let that old guy in, will ye?
58534	How are things?
58534	How are you, Mr. Appleboy? 58534 How do you do?"
58534	How do you support yourself?
58534	How long have you lived at this last address?
58534	How say you, do you find the defendant guilty or not guilty?
58534	How say you? 58534 How shall I do that?"
58534	How shall I get it?
58534	How''s business?
58534	How_ much_ did you give him?
58534	How_ much_ did you give him?
58534	I suppose there''s no objection to my having the teapot back, is there?
58534	I suppose you did n''t believe that Mr. Einstein made those false statements?
58534	I suppose you have nothing to ask him?
58534	Is n''t that enough?
58534	Is that all?
58534	Is that all?
58534	It''s yours, ai n''t it? 58534 Jumped?"
58534	Look here,he exclaims rather angrily,"what is the sense of all this red tape?
58534	Madam,he began courteously,"you say you gave the defendant money?"
58534	Mr. District Attorney,remarked the presiding justice dryly( which did not lessen the confusion of the young lawyer),"is this a fact?
58534	My dear sir,he says,"are you aware that I have no means of knowing that you are the Silas Appleboy who owns this teapot, except your own say so?"
58534	Name?
58534	Now, young man, have you ever been convicted?
58534	Occupation?
58534	Or against this defendant?
58534	People against McCord?
58534	People against Smith?
58534	People against Vermicelli?
58534	Quite sure? 58534 Seventy?"
58534	Skipped her bail, did she? 58534 Speaking of property,"continues Mrs. Appleboy,"where''s the teapot?"
58534	Stole a teapot,--um-- um-- Is this the defendant?
58534	Supposing, however, she were captured and brought back and tried, how do I know but that the jury might acquit her? 58534 Twenty miles an hour?"
58534	Well, Mr. Appleboy,remarks the sergeant,"what became of that cook of yours?
58534	Well, Silas,she inquires,"has that woman been convicted at last?"
58534	Well, what do you want?
58534	Well, what makes you think we have it?
58534	What are yer makin''all this row about, and blockin''up the street fer?
58534	What did you see him do?
58534	What do you mean?
58534	What do you say, Mr. District Attorney?
58534	What do you want?
58534	What have you to say, if anything, relative to the charge against you?
58534	What is the state of the case?
58534	What paper do you read?
58534	What paper?
58534	What was her name?
58534	What''s the trouble?
58534	What''s yer name?
58534	What''s yer name?
58534	When did she steal the teapot?
58534	When were you convicted?
58534	Where did you last see the teapot?
58534	Where is the defendant?
58534	Where is the defendant?
58534	Where is the prisoner?
58534	Who are yer anyway?
58534	Who''s Maria Holohan, anyway?
58534	Why should it?
58534	Why, Silas,interrupts his wife sharply,"what have you been doing that you are ashamed to tell of?"
58534	Why, is there any doubt about it?
58534	Will you say it was going forty?
58534	Will you say it was going thirty miles an hour?
58534	Would you say that it was going at ten miles an hour?
58534	You''re in the Holohan case, are n''t you? 58534 _ Have you got_ THAT_ in your pants pocket_?"
58534	_ I am quite sure that it is mine._"How do you know?
58534	_ It looks exactly like it._"But may it not be a similar one and not your own?
58534	_ No; it is mine._"But how? 58534 ''_Flaherty to Defendant:"Ever receive any previous religious instruction?"
58534	***** The Grand Jury"which consisted of Nineteen[?
58534	----?"
58534	After his clients had stated their case he would turn to them and ask:"Do you wish the law from the big book or the little book?"
58534	An affirmative answer to the simple question,"Have you ever been convicted?"
58534	Any cross- examination?
58534	Any cross- examination?
58534	Are prosecutors habitually vindictive and over- zealous?
58534	Blickendecker wipes his forehead and turns towards the court:"Your honors, gentlemens, I see dot feller dere----""The defendant?"
58534	By Prof. John H. Wigmore xvii CHAPTER I What Is Crime?
58534	CHAPTER II WHO ARE THE REAL CRIMINALS?
58534	CHAPTER XI THE JURY Is trial by jury successful in criminal cases?
58534	CHAPTER XIV THE SENTENCE"What have you to say why judgment of the court should not be pronounced against you according to law?"
58534	Can this be the stiff, little old bank president he knew six months ago?
58534	Daniel F. Cohalan, attorney for the defendant, then took him in hand somewhat as follows:"Have you any prejudice against a man accused of crime?"
58534	Defendant:"How''s that?"
58534	Did n''t the Supreme Court say there was a reasonable doubt in my case?
58534	Did you see her?"
58534	Do n''t you do anything but read the papers?"
58534	Do you find the defendant guilty or not guilty?"
58534	Do you find the defendant guilty or not guilty?"
58534	Do you plead guilty or not guilty?"
58534	Do you swear that the statements contained in this complaint are the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you, God?"
58534	Dodge?"
58534	Does she look like a guilty woman?
58534	Does such a practice make for justice?
58534	Dough?"
58534	First, how can the sympathies of the jury be enlisted at the very start?
58534	Flaherty to Clerk:"_ Ai n''t got none._"Flaherty to Defendant:"Are ye married?"
58534	Flaherty to Clerk:"_ Ai n''t got none._"Flaherty to Defendant:"Phat do yez do fer a livin''?"
58534	Flaherty to Defendant:"Phat''s yer religion?"
58534	Flaherty to Defendant:"Say, me friend, where was ye born?"
58534	Flaherty to Defendant:"Where do yez hang out?"
58534	For example:"Do you know the defendant?"
58534	Has he got to make another trip down to that miserable Criminal Courts building?
58534	Has the defendant a license?"
58534	Has the jury system broken down?
58534	He drew from his pocket a folded paper and handed it to the paralyzed young attorney with the harsh demand:"What do you say to that?"
58534	He''s one of those----s, is he?
58534	How about the_ real_ criminals?"
58534	How about those Ship- Building fellers?"
58534	How do you know Maria has n''t taken it with her to Ireland?"
58534	How do_ I_ know yer ai n''t throwin''some game into me?"
58534	How far are the interests of the public and the prisoner irreconcilable?
58534	How far may he temper justice with mercy?
58534	I am asked what I have to say why judgment of death should not be pronounced against me?
58534	I am not guilty of thoo dedys, ne noon of hem, God help me so.... How wylte thou acquite the?...
58534	If a defendant intends to prove himself irresponsible for his offence, why should he not be compelled to enter a specific plea to that effect?
58534	If such be the case, did he know right from wrong as applied to the particular act in question?
58534	If they could beat a case in which they had already pleaded_ guilty_, what could they not do where the evidence was less obvious?
58534	In one case an aggressive talesman broke in upon a burst of carefully prepared eloquence with the brutal interrogation:"How about the_ knife_?"
58534	Is it want of intelligence, lack of regard for law, or vital misconception of their function?
58534	Is n''t that enough?"
58534	Is that it?"
58534	Judge to the prisoner:"Nothing to say, I suppose?"
58534	No?
58534	No?
58534	Now suppose that on reaching the police station the burglar turns out not to be a burglar at all but the family doctor?
58534	One of the ladies referred to testified as follows:"Can you identify that diamond?"
58534	Or a gentleman who has mistaken some one''s else area for his own?
58534	Or a late caller upon the cook?
58534	Or the transactions of a morning only a week ago, with any accuracy as to time?
58534	Or:"How old are you?"
58534	Prisoner, look upon the jury,"continued the clerk, and turning to the foreman,"How say you?
58534	Smith?"
58534	Smith?"
58534	So you plead guilty, do you?
58534	THE PRISONER AT THE BAR The Prisoner at the Bar CHAPTER I WHAT IS CRIME?
58534	That''s you, is it?
58534	The case is over, I own the teapot,--why do n''t you give it to me and be done with it?"
58534	The clerk put the usual questions and then inquired:"Have you ever been convicted before?"
58534	The company or the retailer?
58534	The jury acquitted, and who can say that there was not at least a reasonable doubt?"]
58534	The latter took the stand, and the judge inquired with a smile:"You did n''t intend to cheat this man, did you?"
58534	The officer, dropping his voice, remarks, confidentially:"Say, do you ever take a drink?"
58534	The quaint old report begins in Latin, but"the pleadings"are set forth in the language of the day, as follows:"Agnes Archer, is that thy name?
58534	The writer remembers being nicely hoisted by his own petard on a similar occasion:"What do you do for a living?"
58534	Then to the jury:"Gentlemen, I suppose you have no doubt?
58534	There was a long pause, and then the judge, looking down intently from the bench, said:"Graham, is that the truth?"
58534	There you are, and you say now she skipped her bail?"
58534	Under what circumstances was the theft committed?"
58534	What can I do for you?"
58534	What can be done about it?
58534	What chance under those circumstances of a conviction?
58534	What did these judges mean by_ know_?
58534	What do these fellows do, I would like to know, to earn their salary?
58534	What does the ordinary juryman mean by it?
58534	What does the reader mean by_ know_?
58534	What generally occurs?
58534	What is crime?
58534	What is it you say I must do; get an order from the mayor?"
58534	What is the explanation for this?
58534	What is this circumstantial romance when it comes to be analyzed?
58534	What must have been the effect on the court officers, the witnesses, the defendants out on bail, the complainants, the spectators?
58534	What paper do you read in the morning?"
58534	What should he do?
58534	What was the use of trying to do good work any longer?
58534	What will he say?
58534	What would you advise me to do?"
58534	What would_ you_ do?
58534	Where are you going?"
58534	Where is it?"
58534	Who can picture the horror of a life- time of repentance or of mocking remorselessness?
58534	Who does the adulterating?
58534	Who shall say how many embryonic law- breakers took courage at the story and started upon an experimental attempt at crime?
58534	Who_ are_ the"_ real_"criminals?
58534	Why do these big men patrol the streets and order us about?
58534	Why will they do such things?
58534	Why, the jury argued, should the lawyer object unless the making of such a forgery were in fact an easy matter?
58534	Why?
58534	Will he put in a defence?
58534	Will he testify in his own behalf?
58534	Without discussing this embarrassing question, does the reader know what he would have a right to do?
58534	Woman stole your teapot, did n''t she?"
58534	Yes,--better for whom?
58534	Yet how far does the element of sex defeat the ends of justice?
58534	Yet who of us could state with certainty the guests at a particular dinner six months ago?
58534	You had a teapot worth over fifty dollars, and your cook stole it?
58534	Your cook, eh?
58534	[ 27]"Jury satisfactory to both sides?"
58534	_ Q._"Did you_ see_ him?"
58534	_ Q._"How do you know?"
58534	_ Question 3._--"In what terms ought the question to be left to the jury as to the prisoner''s state of mind when the act was committed?
58534	_ Question 4._--"If a person under an insane delusion as to existing facts commits an offence in consequence thereof, is he thereby excused?
58534	and the judge, gazing at a long sheet of foolscap in his hand, remarks inquiringly:"People against Murphy?"
58534	do, if his quarry attempt to escape?
58534	says the magistrate;"and do you say that the defendant struck you?"
18281	Are ye not of more value than many sparrows?
18281	A paper that you made yourself?
18281	About what time in the day, or what time in the morning was it that these ladies voted?
18281	All three of the inspectors agreed in receiving these names for registration, did they not?
18281	All you know about these tickets or that book, is what appears on the face of it, is it not?
18281	And candidates voted for both of those officers by those who saw fit to vote for them?
18281	And did they receive their votes?
18281	And do you now?
18281	And is not their_ political subjection_ as absolute as was that of the African slaves?
18281	And she was registered accordingly?
18281	And six tickets voted at that poll?
18281	And taking a registration list?
18281	And were acting as inspectors of election when these ladies voted?
18281	And what, again, is the basis of political rights?
18281	And when they voted, yourself and Mr. Marsh were in favor of receiving the votes, and Hall was opposed to receiving the votes?
18281	And when you handed it in it was folded, so that no one could see it?
18281	And where does Congress derive the power to pass laws to punish offenders against the laws of a State?
18281	Answer that question, please?
18281	Any other?
18281	Are they capacities merely?
18281	Are they not also rights?"
18281	Are they not shown to be_ subjects_ of the other half, who are the sovereigns?
18281	Are women governed?
18281	Are you one of the defendants in this indictment?
18281	Are you willing to testify that you recollect distinctly, anything that was said by either of the inspectors when these ladies voted?
18281	As I understand you, all three of the inspectors agreed in permitting these people to be registered?
18281	At that time was Jones there?
18281	At the time of the registry, when her name was registered, was the Supervisor of Election present at the Board?
18281	At the time they voted?
18281	At the time you saw these ladies register, were the three inspectors, Hall, Jones, and Marsh present?
18281	Attorney for the Northern District of New York?
18281	Before you go further, state who was present at that time?
18281	But are women,_ who are not infants_, ever included in this category?
18281	But how was it to be obtained?
18281	But the other two were a majority, and he was overruled; was this the way it was, or was n''t there anything in form said about it?
18281	But you saw those whose names you have given?
18281	By and between whom?
18281	By the people of the ward?
18281	By whom do they purport to be signed?
18281	By whom were those books left in your office, if by any one?
18281	By whom?
18281	C. Storrs, a United States Commissioner, in the city of Rochester, when her case was examined?
18281	Can the United States destroy rights on account of sex?
18281	Can the United States, at pleasure, take from its own citizens the right of voting, or abridge that right?
18281	Can the United States, in its sovereign capacity, overthrow the rights of its own citizens?
18281	Can you recollect this without looking at that paper?
18281	Could any person read it, or see what you voted, or who you voted for?
18281	Did Jones take all of the votes of those persons whose names you have on your list?
18281	Did either one of the inspectors object to receiving the votes of the women at the polls?
18281	Did he mention the Congressional ticket?
18281	Did he take any part in receiving votes, and, if so, state what part?
18281	Did it to accommodate you while you stepped out?
18281	Did she give evidence?
18281	Did she name any particular amendment?
18281	Did she, upon that occasion, state that she consulted or talked with Judge Henry R. Selden, of Rochester, in relation to her right to vote?
18281	Did the Board consider that and decide that she was entitled to register?
18281	Did the Board consider the question of her right to registry, and decide that she was entitled to registry as a voter?
18281	Did the defendant vote in good faith in that belief?
18281	Did the framers of the Declaration intend to leave women under the government of Great Britain?
18281	Did these ladies vote the Congressional ticket, all of them?
18281	Did they act as a Board of Registry preceding the election?
18281	Did they advise the registry, or did they not?
18281	Did they all vote on that occasion?
18281	Did they intend to set themselves and their male compeers free, and leave women behind, under a monarchy?
18281	Did you find it correct?
18281	Did you go to Mrs. Leyden''s house and advise her to go and register?
18281	Did you have two meetings for the purpose of registration prior to election?
18281	Did you hear either of the inspectors say anything about it?
18281	Did you hear the statement of Mr. Jones?
18281	Did you keep minutes of evidence on that occasion?
18281	Did you make a certificate and return of that fact?
18281	Did you make any of the entries in that book?
18281	Did you observe which boxes the tickets of these persons were put into?
18281	Did you occupy any official position in the month of November, 1872?
18281	Did you or any of the inspectors see or know the contents of any of the ballots?
18281	Did you receive the tickets from Miss Anthony?
18281	Did you receive the votes of these persons?
18281	Did you reside in the 8th ward?
18281	Did you reside in the City of Rochester in the month of November, 1872?
18281	Did you say anything there, about getting twenty women to vote?
18281	Did you see Miss Anthony and other ladies there upon that day?
18281	Did you see a number of them there?
18281	Did you see any of them register on that day?
18281	Did you see any of these women vote on the day of election?
18281	Did you see her vote?
18281	Did you see him take more than one?
18281	Did you stand at the window and receive the votes?
18281	Did you suppose at that time that the law required you to take their votes?
18281	Did you vote for a candidate for Congress?
18281	Did you, upon the 5th day of November, vote?
18281	Do they not, in that event, occupy,_ politically_, exactly the position which the learned Chief Justice assigns to the African slaves?
18281	Do you know by sight, any of those persons whose names I have read?
18281	Do you know how many tickets they voted, or offered to the inspectors?
18281	Do you know how these tickets were endorsed, or what they were called?
18281	Do you know the defendant, Miss Susan B. Anthony?
18281	Do you know the defendant, Susan B. Anthony?
18281	Do you know the defendants, Jones, Marsh and Hall?
18281	Do you know their hand- writing?
18281	Do you know these defendants, Jones and Marsh?
18281	Do you know what the custom or habit is of copying these books when people vote?
18281	Do you know what those letters are?
18281	Do you know whether it fell short on members of Congress?
18281	Do you know whose it was?
18281	Do you recollect seeing any others register except those you have now mentioned?
18281	Do you recollect seeing those persons register, or do you suppose they did, because you find it on a paper there?
18281	Do you recollect that he did?
18281	Do you recollect who took your vote?
18281	Do you see no parallel between Adolph and the women of America?
18281	Do you swear you saw Mrs. Leyden register?
18281	Does B''s misapprehension of his rights justify his act?
18281	Does any lawyer doubt my statement of the legal status of married women?
18281	Does any such principle of exclusion apply to them?
18281	Does that paper contain dates?
18281	For, what one civil right is worth a rush after a man''s property is subject to be taken from him at pleasure without his consent?
18281	From that poll list what tickets does it purport to show that she voted upon that occasion?
18281	From what does it date?
18281	Had the Board of Inspectors been regularly organized?
18281	Hall received the vote on account of Jones being absent?
18281	Hall, or any of them?
18281	Has it the right to take from citizens of States the right of voting?
18281	Has their consent bean asked through their votes?
18281	Have they a recognized right to the ballot?
18281	Have they consented to this power of the government?
18281	Have they had a voice in saying what taxes shall be levied on their property,--what penalties they shall pay for crimes?
18281	Have you a list of those that you saw register?
18281	Have you any registration lists and poll lists of the 1st Election District, 8th Ward, City of Rochester, in your possession?
18281	He saw it before you voted?
18281	How can the state deny or abridge the right of the citizen, if the citizen does not possess it?
18281	How could_ four_ millions negroes be made voters if_ two_ millions were not included?
18281	How long have you held that office?
18281	How many ballot boxes were there there?
18281	How many ballot boxes were there?
18281	How many of the large class to whom the right of voting is supposed to have been secured by the fifteenth amendment, are qualified to hold office?
18281	How many of the male bipeds who do our voting are qualified to hold high offices?
18281	How many of these people did you see vote?
18281	How many?
18281	How often have mothers governed large kingdoms, as regents, during the minority of their sons, and governed them well?
18281	How then could the defendant be lawfully deprived of the right to ask every juror if the verdict had his assent?
18281	How was you appointed?
18281	If Hindoo women could have shaped the laws of India, would widows for ages have been burned on the funeral pyres of their deceased husbands?
18281	If his vote is to be rejected after he takes the oath, why not reject it before?
18281	If she believed she had a right to vote, and voted in reliance upon that belief, does that relieve her from the penalty?
18281	In accordance with the instruction?
18281	In receiving those ballots did you act honestly in accordance with your sense of duty, and in accordance with your best judgment?
18281	In that view of the case, is there anything to go to the jury?
18281	In the first election district of that ward?
18281	In voting, did you believe that you had a right to vote, and vote in good faith?
18281	In what Congressional District was the city of Rochester at the time?
18281	In what Congressional District was the first election district of the 8th Ward, in November, 1872?
18281	In what capacity were you acting upon that day, if any, in relation to elections?
18281	In what district?
18281	In what election district were you inspector of elections?
18281	In what way does the consent of the governed come?
18281	Into how many election districts is the 8th ward divided, if it contains more than one?
18281	Is anything further needed to prove woman''s condition of servitude sufficiently orthodox to entitle her to the guaranties of the fifteenth amendment?
18281	Is it a crime to be a woman?
18281	Is it less pertinent for us to ask if personal representation is not more sacred than property representation?
18281	Is it possible to amend a Constitution not in accordance with its underlying principles?
18281	Is n''t such a position, I ask you, humiliating enough to be called"servitude?"
18281	Is that a reason for denying the right to those who would vote?
18281	Is the right to vote one of the privileges or immunities of citizens?
18281	Is there a certificate attached to them, purporting to show what they are?
18281	It was canvassed previous to election day between them?
18281	JUDGE HUNT--(Ordering the defendant to stand up),"Has the prisoner anything to say why sentence shall not be pronounced?"
18281	MISS ANTHONY: I would like to know if the testimony of a person who has been convicted of a crime, can be taken?
18281	MR. VAN VOORHIS: Does that exclude all conversations that occurred there with any persons?
18281	MR. VAN VOORHIS: I suppose it will be conceded that Hall stands in the same position as to his motives?
18281	MR. VAN VOORHIS: If the jury should find a verdict of not guilty, could your Honor set it aside?
18281	MR. VAN VOORHIS: Then why should it go to the jury?
18281	Miss Anthony, I want you to state what occurred at the Board of Registry, when your name was registered?
18281	No mention is there made of women, but who will deny it was not intended for them to enjoy the right of worshipping as they choose?
18281	No one had seen your ballot except your husband before you handed it in?
18281	Now turn to the names of voters contained in the list copied upon election day; do you find the name of Susan B. Anthony upon that list?
18281	Now where do men get their constitutional right to govern women?
18281	On the day of election were you at the polls?
18281	On the day of registry did the inspectors as a board decide unanimously to register these votes, all three of you consenting?
18281	On the last day of registry?
18281	On their presenting their votes, what was done?
18281	On what ground was that?
18281	On what ground?
18281	Or why they were made, so far as you have any knowledge?
18281	Please look and see which of those tickets the list purports to show that they voted?
18281	Please look at the paper now shown you and see if it contains the minutes you kept upon that occasion?
18281	Please point out the following names, if you find them in the registration list: Susan B. Anthony?
18281	Please state from the heading what tickets it purports to show they voted?
18281	Pound, was she asked there if she had any doubt about her right to vote, and did she answer"Not a particle?"
18281	Prior to the election, was there a registry of voters in that district made?
18281	Q. Ann S. Mosher?
18281	Q. Ann S. Mosher?
18281	Q. Ellen S. Baker?
18281	Q. Hannah Chatfield?
18281	Q. Hannah Chatfield?
18281	Q. I want to get at what he said when these votes were taken?
18281	Q. Jane Cogswell?
18281	Q. Jane Cogswell?
18281	Q. Jones''position was at the window receiving votes?
18281	Q. Lottie B. Anthony?
18281	Q. Lottie B. Anthony?
18281	Q. Margaret Leyden?
18281	Q. Margaret Leyden?
18281	Q. Mary Anthony?
18281	Q. Mary Anthony?
18281	Q. Mary Pulver?
18281	Q. Mary Pulver?
18281	Q. Mary S. Baker?
18281	Q. Mary S. Hibbard?
18281	Q. Mary S. Hibbard?
18281	Q. Mr. Jones, where do you reside?
18281	Q. Mrs. Lottie B. Anthony is the wife of Alderman Anthony?
18281	Q. Nancy Chapman?
18281	Q. Nancy M. Chapman?
18281	Q. Rhoda DeGarmo?
18281	Q. Rhoda DeGarmo?
18281	Q. Sarah Truesdell?
18281	Q. Sarah Truesdell?
18281	Q. Susan M. Hough?
18281	Q. Susan M. Hough?
18281	Receiving the names of persons who claimed to be entitled to vote?
18281	Receiving votes?
18281	Shall the women of this country forever have cause to say that the declaration and the constitution are specially defined,--are organs of special law?
18281	She was not challenged on the day she voted?
18281	State generally what was done, or what occupied that hour''s time?
18281	State to the jury whether you had separate boxes for the several tickets voted in that election district?
18281	State what tickets she voted, if you know, Mr. Jones?
18281	State whether that is the poll list of voters kept upon the day of election in the first election district of the 8th ward, of the city of Rochester?
18281	State, Mr. Morrison?
18281	State, if you please, what occurred when you presented yourself at the polls on election day?
18281	Story asks,"Who are the parties to this great contract?"
18281	THE CLERK: How say you, do you find the prisoners at the bar guilty of the offense whereof they stand indicted, or not guilty?
18281	THE COURT: What is the object of this?
18281	THE COURT: What?
18281	THE COURT: Will it change the case at all, Mr. Van Voorhis?
18281	That she was a woman?
18281	That was the practice of the inspector, no matter who voted?
18281	The clerk called the names of the jury and then said: THE CLERK: Gentlemen, have you agreed upon your verdict?
18281	The clerk polled the jury, each juror answering in the affirmative to the question,"Is this your verdict?"
18281	The only question left to be settled, now, is: Are women persons?
18281	The question of_ State_ rights was not as great a question as this: What are United States rights?
18281	Then you did n''t see the tickets as they went into the boxes?
18281	There are a large number of the inspectors''books of the last election filed with you as City Clerk, are there not?
18281	There was a stenographic reporter there, was there not?
18281	There would remain another and most vital question in the case, and that is, did he intend to vote unlawfully?
18281	These are certainly great ameliorations of the law; but how have they been produced?
18281	Those produced here to- day are the lists kept upon that occasion, are they not?
18281	To save time, I will ask you whether that was substantially correct as you understand it?
18281	Turn to the name of Susan B. Anthony, if it is upon that poll list?
18281	Under that she claimed her right to vote?
18281	Upon the 5th day of November, did the defendant, Susan B. Anthony, vote in the first election district of the 8th ward of the city of Rochester?
18281	Upon the day of election were the defendants Jones, Marsh, and Hall, acting as inspectors of election?
18281	Upon the day of election you had a list of voters?
18281	Upon the days fixed by the laws of the State of New York?
18281	Upon the list copied by the inspectors upon the day of election, is there any heading purporting to show what tickets these people voted?
18281	Was Miss Anthony challenged before the Board of Registry?
18281	Was Miss Anthony challenged upon that occasion?
18281	Was Mr. Lewis there when you registered?
18281	Was any application made to you, by any person, at any time, for a warrant against them for this offence?
18281	Was he consulted upon the question of whether she was entitled to registry, or did he express an opinion on the subject to the inspectors?
18281	Was not this question put to her"Did you have any doubt yourself of your right to vote?"
18281	Was she called as a witness in her own behalf upon that examination?
18281	Was she challenged at any time?
18281	Was she sworn?
18281	Was that all he said?
18281	Was that done in each case of the women who voted?
18281	Was the defendant legally entitled to vote at the election in question?
18281	Was the preliminary and the general oath administered?
18281	Was there a poll list kept of the voters of the first election district of the 8th ward on the day of election?
18281	Was there any objection made, or any doubt raised as to her right to vote?
18281	Was you one of the officers engaged in making that registry?
18281	Was you present on any day when they were registering voters?
18281	Was your ballot folded up?
18281	Was your husband present when you voted?
18281	Was your name registered before the election which took place on the 5th of November, 1872?
18281	Was your objection to registering Miss Anthony on the ground that she was a woman?
18281	Well, give us what you know about the boxes?
18281	Well, they did before they were registered, did they not?
18281	Well, was it about 5 o''clock in the morning-- very early?
18281	Well, was the question of your right to be registered a subject of discussion there?
18281	Were all three of these defendants there?
18281	Were both the other inspectors present when he took it?
18281	Were not women intended to be included in the benefits of the constitution?
18281	Were questions asked her?
18281	Were the other inspectors there at the time?
18281	Were there two boxes for Congressmen?
18281	Were these defendants present when their votes were received?
18281	Were these people, or any of them, present, and were they registered at the same time you were?
18281	Were they not to be protected in freedom of speech, and in the right of assembling to petition the government for a redress of grievances?
18281	Were those ballots which you received from them folded?
18281	Were you elected or appointed?
18281	Were you inspector of election in the 8th ward?
18281	Were you one of the inspectors of the 8th ward?
18281	Were you present at the Board of Registry when Miss Anthony and others appeared there and demanded to be registered?
18281	Were you present on the day of election?
18281	What are the privileges and immunities of citizens?
18281	What are those books you hold in your hand?
18281	What custom the inspectors have of indicating what tickets a person votes when he offers his vote?
18281	What day was the election?
18281	What did you do with them when you received them?
18281	What further can be demanded of them?
18281	What is a slave?
18281	What is it?
18281	What is servitude?
18281	What is the admitted basis of our nation?
18281	What is the statement there?
18281	What is your age?
18281	What is your age?
18281	What number is it?
18281	What office do you hold?
18281	What paper are you reading from?
18281	What position did you occupy during the day?
18281	What prevents them unless it is unjust illegal power?
18281	What privilege or immunity has California or Oregon the constitutional right to deny them, save that of the ballot?
18281	What sort of a poll list?
18281	What then was the intention?
18281	What was the defect in her right to vote as a citizen?
18281	What was your business at the registry at that time?
18281	What"other rights fall within the protection of these articles?"
18281	What"other rights"do these amendments cover?
18281	What, then, are the"privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States"which are secured against such abridgement, by this section?
18281	When Miss Anthony voted, what did she do?
18281	When she offered her vote, was the same objection brought up in the Board of Inspectors, or question made of her right to vote as a woman?
18281	When the registry was being made did Miss Anthony appear before the Board of Registry and claim to be registered as a voter?
18281	When you came to receive the votes, Hall dissented?
18281	When you counted up your votes at night, when the polls closed, did you compare your votes with the list?
18281	Where did you live in November, 1872?
18281	Where did you live, in November, 1872?
18281	Where do you live now?
18281	Where do you reside?
18281	Where were you living on the 5th of November, 1872?
18281	Which district?
18281	Which of those persons did you see register?
18281	Which one?
18281	Which one?
18281	Which were they?
18281	Who can say our forefathers_ intended_ to include Chinamen, or Sandwich Islanders, or the Norwegian, Russian, or Italian in its benefits?
18281	Who did you see vote, or offer their votes upon the day of election?
18281	Who of these ladies were present when you voted and voted with you, if any?
18281	Who put them in the boxes?
18281	Who received your vote?
18281	Who took Miss Anthony''s vote?
18281	Who took any others that you saw?
18281	Who were inspectors with you?
18281	Who?
18281	Will the Clerk poll the jury?
18281	Will you produce them?
18281	Will you state to the jury what tickets she voted, whether State, Assembly, Congress and Electoral?
18281	Wo n''t you state what Miss Anthony said, if she said anything, when she came there and offered her name for registration?
18281	Wo n''t you state what occurred there?
18281	You ca n''t swear which boxes they went into?
18281	You copied that paper from the registry, did n''t you?
18281	You did n''t hear any such statement as that?
18281	You do n''t know who made those straight marks?
18281	You had canvassed the ward in the employment of somebody?
18281	You have heard me name the different persons, have you not, when I asked Mr. Morrison questions?
18281	You heard the remark made that they voted four tickets; who made that remark?
18281	You made a list or registry, did you not, upon those days?
18281	You may proceed and state what occurred there?
18281	You presented yourself as a female, claiming that you had a right to vote?
18281	You say you find the defendant guilty of the offense whereof she stands indicted, and so say you all?
18281	You took the two oaths there, did you?
18281	You were not near enough to see what these ballots were?
18281	You would say that to each of these persons the preliminary oath was administered, and also the general oath?
18281	_ If he refuse to take the oath, his vote shall be rejected._ Is not the inference irresistible, that, if he take the oath, it shall be received?
18281	and did she not answer"Not a particle?"
1404	After all, may not another ground be taken on which this article of the Constitution will admit of a still more ready defense? 1404 Why,"say they,"should we adopt an imperfect thing?
1404	( 1) Are we even in a condition to remonstrate with dignity?
1404	And how could it have happened otherwise?
1404	And how far does this combination characterize the plan which has been reported by the convention?
1404	And it is asked by what authority this bold and radical innovation was undertaken?
1404	And what are the different classes of legislators but advocates and parties to the causes which they determine?
1404	And what is there in all this that can not as well be performed by the national legislature as by a State legislature?
1404	And who is there that will either take the trouble or incur the odium, of a strict scrutiny into the secret springs of the transaction?
1404	And will he not, from his own interest in that species of property, be sufficiently prone to resist every attempt to prejudice or encumber it?
1404	Are fleets and armies and revenues necessary to this purpose?
1404	Are not popular assemblies frequently subject to the impulses of rage, resentment, jealousy, avarice, and of other irregular and violent propensities?
1404	Are not the former administered by MEN as well as the latter?
1404	Are suppositions of this sort the sober admonitions of discerning patriots to a discerning people?
1404	Are the State governments to be stigmatized as tyrannies, because they possess this power?
1404	Are there engagements to the performance of which we are held by every tie respectable among men?
1404	Are there not aversions, predilections, rivalships, and desires of unjust acquisitions, that affect nations as well as kings?
1404	Are they agreed, are any two of them agreed, in their objections to the remedy proposed, or in the proper one to be substituted?
1404	Are they not the genuine and the characteristic means by which republican government provides for the liberty and happiness of the people?
1404	Are they not the identical means on which every State government in the Union relies for the attainment of these important ends?
1404	Are they only to be met with in the towns or cities?
1404	Are we afraid of foreign gold?
1404	Are we entitled by nature and compact to a free participation in the navigation of the Mississippi?
1404	Are we in a condition to resent or to repel the aggression?
1404	Are"the wealthy and the well- born,"as they are called, confined to particular spots in the several States?
1404	But SUSPICION may ask, Why then was it introduced?
1404	But a right implies a remedy; and where else could the remedy be deposited, than where it is deposited by the Constitution?
1404	But are they not all that government will admit, and that human prudence can devise?
1404	But could an appeal be made to lie from the State courts to the subordinate federal judicatories?
1404	But does it follow because there is a power to lay them that they will actually be laid?
1404	But even in that case, may he have no object beyond his present station, to which he may sacrifice his independence?
1404	But have they considered whether a better form could have been substituted?
1404	But is it a just idea?
1404	But is not the fact an alarming proof of the danger resulting from a government which does not possess regular powers commensurate to its objects?
1404	But it may be again asked, Who is to judge of the NECESSITY and PROPRIETY of the laws to be passed for executing the powers of the Union?
1404	But might not his nomination be overruled?
1404	But ought not a more direct and explicit provision to have been made in favor of the State courts?
1404	But the question again recurs, upon what pretense could he be put in possession of a force of that magnitude in time of peace?
1404	But upon what principle is the discrimination of the places of election to be made, in order to answer the purpose of the meditated preference?
1404	But was it necessary to give an INDEFINITE POWER of raising TROOPS, as well as providing fleets; and of maintaining both in PEACE, as well as in WAR?
1404	But what inference can be drawn from this, or what would they amount to, if they were not to be supreme?
1404	But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature?
1404	But what is to be the object of this capricious partiality in the national councils?
1404	But what would be the contest in the case we are supposing?
1404	But where are the means to be found by the President, or the Senate, or both?
1404	But whether made by one side or the other, would each side enjoy equal advantages on the trial?
1404	But why is the experiment of an extended republic to be rejected, merely because it may comprise what is new?
1404	But why, it is asked, might not the same purpose have been accomplished by the instrumentality of the State courts?
1404	But will not this also be possessed in sufficient degree by a very few intelligent men, diffusively elected within the State?
1404	But would not her navigation be materially injured by the loss of the important advantage of being her own carrier in that trade?
1404	By way of answer to this, it has been triumphantly asked, Why not in the first instance omit that ambiguous power, and rely upon the latter resource?
1404	By what means is this object attainable?
1404	Can it be said that the limits of the United States exceed this distance?
1404	Can not the like knowledge be obtained in the national legislature from the representatives of each State?
1404	Could the Supreme Court have been relied upon as answering this description?
1404	Do the monitors deny the reality of her danger?
1404	Do these fundamental principles require, particularly, that no tax should be levied without the intermediate agency of the States?
1404	Do they begin by exciting the detestation of the very instruments of their intended usurpations?
1404	Do they deny the necessity of some speedy and powerful remedy?
1404	Do they require that the members of the government should derive their appointment from the legislatures, not from the people of the States?
1404	Do they require that the powers of the government should act on the States, and not immediately on individuals?
1404	Do they require that, in the establishment of the Constitution, the States should be regarded as distinct and independent sovereigns?
1404	Do we owe debts to foreigners and to our own citizens contracted in a time of imminent peril for the preservation of our political existence?
1404	Does the American impose on the Congress appropriations for two years?
1404	Does the British Constitution restrain the parliamentary discretion to one year?
1404	For what inducement could the Senate have to concur in a preference in which itself would not be included?
1404	For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?
1404	From what quarter can the danger proceed?
1404	Had not Congress repeatedly recommended this measure as not inconsistent with the fundamental principles of the Confederation?
1404	Had not every State but one; had not New York herself, so far complied with the plan of Congress as to recognize the PRINCIPLE of the innovation?
1404	Has commerce hitherto done anything more than change the objects of war?
1404	Has it been found that bodies of men act with more rectitude or greater disinterestedness than individuals?
1404	Has not the spirit of commerce, in many instances, administered new incentives to the appetite, both for the one and for the other?
1404	Have republics in practice been less addicted to war than monarchies?
1404	Have they, by some miraculous instinct or foresight, set apart in each of them a common place of residence?
1404	Have we not had unequivocal experience of its effects in the course of the revolution which we have just accomplished?
1404	Here another question occurs: What relation would subsist between the national and State courts in these instances of concurrent jurisdiction?
1404	How can it ever possess either energy or stability, dignity or credit, confidence at home or respectability abroad?
1404	How can it undertake or execute any liberal or enlarged plans of public good?
1404	How can its administration be any thing else than a succession of expedients temporizing, impotent, disgraceful?
1404	How can perfection spring from such materials?
1404	How can the trade between the different States be duly regulated, without some knowledge of their relative situations in these and other respects?
1404	How could recoveries be enforced?
1404	How could the Senate confer a benefit upon the President by the manner of employing their right of negative upon his nominations?
1404	How could they better gratify this, than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?
1404	How far can they be combined with those other ingredients which constitute safety in the republican sense?
1404	How shall we prevent a conflict between charity and conviction?
1404	How will it be able to avoid a frequent sacrifice of its engagements to immediate necessity?
1404	How would it be possible to agree upon a rule of apportionment satisfactory to all?
1404	How, and when, and in what proportion shall aids of men and money be afforded?
1404	How, in fact, could a majority in the House of Representatives impeach themselves?
1404	I ask, What are these principles?
1404	If any question is depending in a State legislature respecting one of the counties, which demands a knowledge of local details, how is it acquired?
1404	If it should break forth into a storm, who can insure us that in its progress a part of its fury would not be spent upon us?
1404	If one was attacked, would the others fly to its succor, and spend their blood and money in its defense?
1404	If the latter, in what relation will they stand to the national tribunals?
1404	If there should be an army to be made use of as the engine of despotism, what need of the militia?
1404	If this be the design of it, who can so properly be the inquisitors for the nation as the representatives of the nation themselves?
1404	If this be their true interest, have they in fact pursued it?
1404	If, on the contrary, we ought to exceed this point, where can we stop, short of an indefinite power of providing for emergencies as they may arise?
1404	In relation to what objects?
1404	In what does our security consist against usurpation from that quarter?
1404	In what manner is this influence to be exerted?
1404	Is a bill of rights essential to liberty?
1404	Is a law proposed concerning private debts?
1404	Is a violent and unnatural decrease in the value of land a symptom of national distress?
1404	Is an indefinite power to raise money dangerous in the hands of the federal government?
1404	Is an indefinite power to raise troops dangerous?
1404	Is another object of a bill of rights to define certain immunities and modes of proceeding, which are relative to personal and private concerns?
1404	Is commerce of importance to national wealth?
1404	Is it a fair comparison?
1404	Is it here that suspicion rests her charge?
1404	Is it improper and unsafe to intermix the different powers of government in the same body of men?
1404	Is it not designed as a method of NATIONAL INQUEST into the conduct of public men?
1404	Is it not( we may ask these projectors in politics) the true interest of all nations to cultivate the same benevolent and philosophic spirit?
1404	Is it particularly dangerous to give the keys of the treasury, and the command of the army, into the same hands?
1404	Is it possible that foreign nations can either respect or confide in such a government?
1404	Is it possible that the people of America will longer consent to trust their honor, their happiness, their safety, on so precarious a foundation?
1404	Is it probable that such a combination would exist at all?
1404	Is it supported by REASON?
1404	Is it to be presumed that any other State, at the same or any other given period, will be exempt from them?
1404	Is it to be presumed, that at any future septennial epoch the same State will be free from parties?
1404	Is it true that force and right are necessarily on the same side in republican governments?
1404	Is not a want of co- operation the infallible consequence of such a system?
1404	Is not the love of wealth as domineering and enterprising a passion as that of power or glory?
1404	Is not the power of the governor, in this article, on a calculation of political consequences, greater than that of the President?
1404	Is not this the true light in which it ought to be regarded?
1404	Is private credit the friend and patron of industry?
1404	Is public credit an indispensable resource in time of public danger?
1404	Is respectability in the eyes of foreign powers a safeguard against foreign encroachments?
1404	Is the CONSEQUENCE from this doctrine admissible?
1404	Is the administration of justice between the citizens of the same State the proper department of the local governments?
1404	Is the aggregate power of the general government greater than ought to have been vested in it?
1404	Is the danger apprehended from the other branches of the federal government?
1404	Is the doctrine warranted by FACTS?
1404	Is the importation of slaves permitted by the new Constitution for twenty years?
1404	Is the power of declaring war necessary?
1404	Is the power of raising armies and equipping fleets necessary?
1404	Is this the way in which usurpers stride to dominion over a numerous and enlightened nation?
1404	Is this to be exclusive, or are those courts to possess a concurrent jurisdiction?
1404	It has been asked, what is meant by"cases arising under the Constitution,"in contradiction from those"arising under the laws of the United States"?
1404	It may be asked, Why, then, could not a time have been fixed in the Constitution?
1404	It may be asked, perhaps, what has so long kept this disjointed machine from falling entirely to pieces?
1404	Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed?
1404	May he have no connections, no friends, for whom he may sacrifice it?
1404	Must it of necessity be admitted that this power is infringed, so long as a part of the old articles remain?
1404	Or are they the inflammatory ravings of incendiaries or distempered enthusiasts?
1404	Or shall we say they may be continued as long as the danger which occasioned their being raised continues?
1404	Or to what purpose would it be established, in reference to one branch of the legislature, if it could not be extended to the other?
1404	Or why is it suggested that three or four confederacies would be better than one?
1404	Or, if such a trial of firmness between the two branches were hazarded, would not the one be as likely first to yield as the other?
1404	Shall domestic manufactures be encouraged, and in what degree, by restrictions on foreign manufactures?
1404	Shall it be a week, a month, a year?
1404	Shall the Union be constituted the guardian of the common safety?
1404	Should the people of America divide themselves into three or four nations, would not the same thing happen?
1404	The remaining inquiry is: Does it also combine the requisites to safety, in a republican sense-- a due dependence on the people, a due responsibility?
1404	The same house will possess the sole right of instituting impeachments: is not this a complete counterbalance to that of determining them?
1404	The true question to be decided then is, whether the smallness of the number, as a temporary regulation, be dangerous to the public liberty?
1404	They must therefore depend on the information of intelligent men, in whom they confide; and how must these men obtain their information?
1404	This is the form in which the comparison is usually stated to the public: but is it a just form?
1404	To what purpose then require the co- operation of the Senate?
1404	To what purpose would it be to authorize suits against States for the debts they owe?
1404	Upon what principle, then, ought they to be taken into the federal estimate of representation?
1404	What answer shall we give to those who would persuade us that things so unlike resemble each other?
1404	What are the MEANS to execute a LEGISLATIVE power but LAWS?
1404	What are the advantages promised to counterbalance these disadvantages?
1404	What are the characters which practice has stamped upon it?
1404	What are the chief sources of expense in every government?
1404	What are the proper means of executing such a power, but NECESSARY and PROPER laws?
1404	What are to be the objects of federal legislation?
1404	What colorable reason could be assigned, in a country so situated, for such vast augmentations of the military force?
1404	What difference can it make in point of expense to pay officers of the customs appointed by the State or by the United States?
1404	What equitable causes can grow out of the Constitution and laws of the United States?
1404	What has occasioned that enormous accumulation of debts with which several of the European nations are oppressed?
1404	What is a LEGISLATIVE power, but a power of making LAWS?
1404	What is a power, but the ability or faculty of doing a thing?
1404	What is the ability to do a thing, but the power of employing the MEANS necessary to its execution?
1404	What is the liberty of the press?
1404	What is the power of laying and collecting taxes, but a LEGISLATIVE POWER, or a power of MAKING LAWS, to lay and collect taxes?
1404	What is the reason on which this proverbial observation is founded?
1404	What is the spirit that has in general characterized the proceedings of Congress?
1404	What more could be desired by an enlightened and reasonable people?
1404	What more desirable or more essential than this quality in the governors of nations?
1404	What more natural than that they should be disposed to exclude from the lists such dangerous competitors?
1404	What relation is to subsist between the nine or more States ratifying the Constitution, and the remaining few who do not become parties to it?
1404	What shall we think of the motives which could induce men of sense to reason in this manner?
1404	What signifies a declaration, that"the liberty of the press shall be inviolably preserved"?
1404	What then are we to understand by the objection which this paper has combated?
1404	What then( it may be asked) is the use of such a provision, if it cease to operate the moment there is an inclination to disregard it?
1404	What time shall be requisite to ascertain the violation?
1404	What will be the conclusion?
1404	What will be the consequence, if we are not able to avail ourselves of the resource in question in its full extent?
1404	What would be the probable conduct of the government in such an emergency?
1404	What, but that he might be unequal to the task which the Constitution assigns him?
1404	What, it may be asked, is the true spirit of the institution itself?
1404	What, then, are the distinctive characters of the republican form?
1404	When armies are once raised what shall be denominated"keeping them up,"contrary to the sense of the Constitution?
1404	Whence is the dreaded augmentation of expense to spring?
1404	Where else than in the Senate could have been found a tribunal sufficiently dignified, or sufficiently independent?
1404	Where in the name of common- sense, are our fears to end if we may not trust our sons, our brothers, our neighbors, our fellow- citizens?
1404	Where is the standard of perfection to be found?
1404	Where more desirable or more essential than in the first magistrate of a nation?
1404	Whether any part of the powers transferred to the general government be unnecessary or improper?
1404	Whether the entire mass of them be dangerous to the portion of jurisdiction left in the several States?
1404	Which the end; which the means?
1404	Which was the more important, which the less important part?
1404	Who are to be the electors of the federal representatives?
1404	Who are to be the objects of popular choice?
1404	Who can determine what might have been the issue of her late convulsions, if the malcontents had been headed by a Caesar or by a Cromwell?
1404	Who can give it any definition which would not leave the utmost latitude for evasion?
1404	Who can pretend that commercial imposts are, or would be, alone equal to the present and future exigencies of the Union?
1404	Who shall command the allied armies, and from which of them shall he receive his orders?
1404	Who shall judge of the continuance of the danger?
1404	Who shall settle the terms of peace, and in case of disputes what umpire shall decide between them and compel acquiescence?
1404	Who would be the parties?
1404	Who would be willing to stake his life and his estate upon the verdict of a jury acting under the auspices of judges who had predetermined his guilt?
1404	Who would not prefer that possibility to the unceasing agitations and frequent revolutions which are the continual scourges of petty republics?
1404	Why has government been instituted at all?
1404	Why not amend it and make it perfect before it is irrevocably established?"
1404	Why should we consent to bear more than our proper share of the common burden?
1404	Why should we do more in proportion than those who are embarked with us in the same political voyage?
1404	Will it be said that the FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES of the Confederation were not within the purview of the convention, and ought not to have been varied?
1404	Will it be said that the alterations ought not to have touched the substance of the Confederation?
1404	Will it lean in favor of the landed interest, or the moneyed interest, or the mercantile interest, or the manufacturing interest?
1404	Will not the landholder know and feel whatever will promote or insure the interest of landed property?
1404	With what color of propriety could the force necessary for defense be limited by those who can not limit the force of offense?
1404	Would Connecticut and New Jersey long submit to be taxed by New York for her exclusive benefit?
1404	Would he on any occasion either have demanded or have received the like humiliation from Spain, or Britain, or any other POWERFUL nation?
1404	Would it have been an improvement of the plan, to have united the Supreme Court with the Senate, in the formation of the court of impeachments?
1404	Would not similar jealousies arise, and be in like manner cherished?
1404	Would not the mere circumstance of freight occasion a considerable deduction?
1404	Would not the principal part of its profits be intercepted by the Dutch, as a compensation for their agency and risk?
1404	Would she not have been compelled to raise and to maintain a more regular force for the execution of her design?
1404	Would the militia, in this supposition, be more ready or more able to support the federal authority than in the case of a general union?
1404	Would there not be the greatest reason to apprehend, that error, in the first sentence, would be the parent of error in the second sentence?
1404	Would they not be likely to prefer a conduct better adapted to their own immediate aggrandizement?
18	After all, may not another ground be taken on which this article of the Constitution will admit of a still more ready defense? 18 Why,"say they,"should we adopt an imperfect thing?
18	And how could it have happened otherwise?
18	And how far does this combination characterize the plan which has been reported by the convention?
18	And how far does this combination characterize the plan which has been reported by the convention?
18	And it is asked by what authority this bold and radical innovation was undertaken?
18	And what are the different classes of legislators but advocates and parties to the causes which they determine?
18	And what is there in all this that can not as well be performed by the national legislature as by a State legislature?
18	And who is there that will either take the trouble or incur the odium, of a strict scrunity into the secret springs of the transaction?
18	And who is there that will either take the trouble or incur the odium, of a strict scrunity into the secret springs of the transaction?
18	And will he not, from his own interest in that species of property, be sufficiently prone to resist every attempt to prejudice or encumber it?
18	Are fleets and armies and revenues necessary to this purpose?
18	Are not popular assemblies frequently subject to the impulses of rage, resentment, jealousy, avarice, and of other irregular and violent propensities?
18	Are not the former administered by MEN as well as the latter?
18	Are suppositions of this sort the sober admonitions of discerning patriots to a discerning people?
18	Are the State governments to be stigmatized as tyrannies, because they possess this power?
18	Are there engagements to the performance of which we are held by every tie respectable among men?
18	Are there not aversions, predilections, rivalships, and desires of unjust acquisitions, that affect nations as well as kings?
18	Are they agreed, are any two of them agreed, in their objections to the remedy proposed, or in the proper one to be substituted?
18	Are they not the genuine and the characteristic means by which republican government provides for the liberty and happiness of the people?
18	Are they not the identical means on which every State government in the Union relies for the attainment of these important ends?
18	Are they only to be met with in the towns or cities?
18	Are we afraid of foreign gold?
18	Are we entitled by nature and compact to a free participation in the navigation of the Mississippi?
18	Are we in a condition to resent or to repel the aggression?
18	Are"the wealthy and the well- born,"as they are called, confined to particular spots in the several States?
18	But SUSPICION may ask, Why then was it introduced?
18	But a right implies a remedy; and where else could the remedy be deposited, than where it is deposited by the Constitution?
18	But are they not all that government will admit, and that human prudence can devise?
18	But could an appeal be made to lie from the State courts to the subordinate federal judicatories?
18	But does it follow because there is a power to lay them that they will actually be laid?
18	But even in that case, may he have no object beyond his present station, to which he may sacrifice his independence?
18	But have they considered whether a better form could have been substituted?
18	But is it a just idea?
18	But is not the fact an alarming proof of the danger resulting from a government which does not possess regular powers commensurate to its objects?
18	But it may be again asked, Who is to judge of the NECESSITY and PROPRIETY of the laws to be passed for executing the powers of the Union?
18	But might not his nomination be overruled?
18	But ought not a more direct and explicit provision to have been made in favor of the State courts?
18	But the question again recurs, upon what pretense could he be put in possession of a force of that magnitude in time of peace?
18	But upon what principle is the discrimination of the places of election to be made, in order to answer the purpose of the meditated preference?
18	But was it necessary to give an INDEFINITE POWER of raising TROOPS, as well as providing fleets; and of maintaining both in PEACE, as well as in war?
18	But what inference can be drawn from this, or what would they amount to, if they were not to be supreme?
18	But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature?
18	But what is to be the object of this capricious partiality in the national councils?
18	But what would be the contest in the case we are supposing?
18	But where are the means to be found by the President, or the Senate, or both?
18	But whether made by one side or the other, would each side enjoy equal advantages on the trial?
18	But why is the experiment of an extended republic to be rejected, merely because it may comprise what is new?
18	But why, it is asked, might not the same purpose have been accomplished by the instrumentality of the State courts?
18	But will not this also be possessed in sufficient degree by a very few intelligent men, diffusively elected within the State?
18	But would not her navigation be materially injured by the loss of the important advantage of being her own carrier in that trade?
18	By way of answer to this, it has been triumphantly asked, Why not in the first instance omit that ambiguous power, and rely upon the latter resource?
18	By what means is this object attainable?
18	Can it be said that the limits of the United States exceed this distance?
18	Can not the like knowledge be obtained in the national legislature from the representatives of each State?
18	Could the Supreme Court have been relied upon as answering this description?
18	Do the monitors deny the reality of her danger?
18	Do these fundamental principles require, particularly, that no tax should be levied without the intermediate agency of the States?
18	Do they begin by exciting the detestation of the very instruments of their intended usurpations?
18	Do they deny the necessity of some speedy and powerful remedy?
18	Do they require that the members of the government should derive their appointment from the legislatures, not from the people of the States?
18	Do they require that the powers of the government should act on the States, and not immediately on individuals?
18	Do they require that, in the establishment of the Constitution, the States should be regarded as distinct and independent sovereigns?
18	Do we owe debts to foreigners and to our own citizens contracted in a time of imminent peril for the preservation of our political existence?
18	Does the American impose on the Congress appropriations for two years?
18	Does the British Constitution restrain the parliamentary discretion to one year?
18	For what inducement could the Senate have to concur in a preference in which itself would not be included?
18	For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do?
18	From what quarter can the danger proceed?
18	Had not Congress repeatedly recommended this measure as not inconsistent with the fundamental principles of the Confederation?
18	Had not every State but one; had not New York herself, so far complied with the plan of Congress as to recognize the PRINCIPLE of the innovation?
18	Has commerce hitherto done anything more than change the objects of war?
18	Has it been found that bodies of men act with more rectitude or greater disinterestedness than individuals?
18	Has not the spirit of commerce, in many instances, administered new incentives to the appetite, both for the one and for the other?
18	Have republics in practice been less addicted to war than monarchies?
18	Have they, by some miraculous instinct or foresight, set apart in each of them a common place of residence?
18	Have we not had unequivocal experience of its effects in the course of the revolution which we have just accomplished?
18	Here another question occurs: What relation would subsist between the national and State courts in these instances of concurrent jurisdiction?
18	How can it ever possess either energy or stability, dignity or credit, confidence at home or respectability abroad?
18	How can it undertake or execute any liberal or enlarged plans of public good?
18	How can its administration be any thing else than a succession of expedients temporizing, impotent, disgraceful?
18	How can perfection spring from such materials?
18	How can the trade between the different States be duly regulated, without some knowledge of their relative situations in these and other respects?
18	How could recoveries be enforced?
18	How could the Senate confer a benefit upon the President by the manner of employing their right of negative upon his nominations?
18	How could they better gratify this, than by raising a creature of their own to the chief magistracy of the Union?
18	How far can they be combined with those other ingredients which constitute safety in the republican sense?
18	How far can they be combined with those other ingredients which constitute safety in the republican sense?
18	How shall we prevent a conflict between charity and judgment?
18	How will it be able to avoid a frequent sacrifice of its engagements to immediate necessity?
18	How would it be possible to agree upon a rule of apportionment satisfactory to all?
18	How, and when, and in what proportion shall aids of men and money be afforded?
18	How, in fact, could a majority in the House of Representatives impeach themselves?
18	I ask, What are these principles?
18	If any question is depending in a State legislature respecting one of the counties, which demands a knowledge of local details, how is it acquired?
18	If it should break forth into a storm, who can insure us that in its progress a part of its fury would not be spent upon us?
18	If one was attacked, would the others fly to its succor, and spend their blood and money in its defense?
18	If the latter, in what relation will they stand to the national tribunals?
18	If there should be an army to be made use of as the engine of despotism, what need of the militia?
18	If this be the design of it, who can so properly be the inquisitors for the nation as the representatives of the nation themselves?
18	If this be their true interest, have they in fact pursued it?
18	If, on the contrary, we ought to exceed this point, where can we stop, short of an indefinite power of providing for emergencies as they may arise?
18	Immediately after this clause follows another in these words:"The President shall have power to fill up??
18	Immediately after this clause follows another in these words:"The President shall have power to fill up??
18	In relation to what objects?
18	In what does our security consist against usurpation from that quarter?
18	In what manner is this influence to be exerted?
18	Is a bill of rights essential to liberty?
18	Is a law proposed concerning private debts?
18	Is a violent and unnatural decrease in the value of land a symptom of national distress?
18	Is an indefinite power to raise money dangerous in the hands of the federal government?
18	Is an indefinite power to raise troops dangerous?
18	Is another object of a bill of rights to define certain immunities and modes of proceeding, which are relative to personal and private concerns?
18	Is commerce of importance to national wealth?
18	Is it a fair comparison?
18	Is it here that suspicion rests her charge?
18	Is it improper and unsafe to intermix the different powers of government in the same body of men?
18	Is it not designed as a method of NATIONAL INQUEST into the conduct of public men?
18	Is it not( we may ask these projectors in politics) the true interest of all nations to cultivate the same benevolent and philosophic spirit?
18	Is it particularly dangerous to give the keys of the treasury, and the command of the army, into the same hands?
18	Is it possible that foreign nations can either respect or confide in such a government?
18	Is it possible that the people of America will longer consent to trust their honor, their happiness, their safety, on so precarious a foundation?
18	Is it probable that such a combination would exist at all?
18	Is it supported by REASON?
18	Is it to be presumed that any other State, at the same or any other given period, will be exempt from them?
18	Is it to be presumed, that at any future septennial epoch the same State will be free from parties?
18	Is it true that force and right are necessarily on the same side in republican governments?
18	Is not a want of co- operation the infallible consequence of such a system?
18	Is not the love of wealth as domineering and enterprising a passion as that of power or glory?
18	Is not the power of the governor, in this article, on a calculation of political consequences, greater than that of the President?
18	Is not this the true light in which it ought to be regarded?
18	Is private credit the friend and patron of industry?
18	Is public credit an indispensable resource in time of public danger?
18	Is respectability in the eyes of foreign powers a safeguard against foreign encroachments?
18	Is the CONSEQUENCE from this doctrine admissible?
18	Is the administration of justice between the citizens of the same State the proper department of the local governments?
18	Is the aggregate power of the general government greater than ought to have been vested in it?
18	Is the danger apprehended from the other branches of the federal government?
18	Is the doctrine warranted by FACTS?
18	Is the importation of slaves permitted by the new Constitution for twenty years?
18	Is the power of declaring war necessary?
18	Is the power of raising armies and equipping fleets necessary?
18	Is this the way in which usurpers stride to dominion over a numerous and enlightened nation?
18	Is this to be exclusive, or are those courts to possess a concurrent jurisdiction?
18	It has also been asked, what need of the word"equity What equitable causes can grow out of the Constitution and laws of the United States?
18	It has been asked, what is meant by"cases arising under the Constitution,"in contradiction from those"arising under the laws of the United States"?
18	It may be asked, Why, then, could not a time have been fixed in the Constitution?
18	It may be asked, perhaps, what has so long kept this disjointed machine from falling entirely to pieces?
18	Law is defined to be a rule of action; but how can that be a rule, which is little known, and less fixed?
18	May he have no connections, no friends, for whom he may sacrifice it?
18	Must it of necessity be admitted that this power is infringed, so long as a part of the old articles remain?
18	Or are they the inflammatory ravings of incendiaries or distempered enthusiasts?
18	Or shall we say they may be continued as long as the danger which occasioned their being raised continues?
18	Or to what purpose would it be established, in reference to one branch of the legislature, if it could not be extended to the other?
18	Or why is it suggested that three or four confederacies would be better than one?
18	Or, if such a trial of firmness between the two branches were hazarded, would not the one be as likely first to yield as the other?
18	Shall domestic manufactures be encouraged, and in what degree, by restrictions on foreign manufactures?
18	Shall it be a week, a month, a year?
18	Shall the Union be constituted the guardian of the common safety?
18	Should the people of America divide themselves into three or four nations, would not the same thing happen?
18	The remaining inquiry is: Does it also combine the requisites to safety, in a republican sense, a due dependence on the people, a due responsibility?
18	The same house will possess the sole right of instituting impeachments: is not this a complete counterbalance to that of determining them?
18	The true question to be decided then is, whether the smallness of the number, as a temporary regulation, be dangerous to the public liberty?
18	They must therefore depend on the information of intelligent men, in whom they confide; and how must these men obtain their information?
18	This is the form in which the comparison is usually stated to the public: but is it a just form?
18	To what purpose then require the co- operation of the Senate?
18	To what purpose would it be to authorize suits against States for the debts they owe?
18	Upon what principle, then, ought they to be taken into the federal estimate of representation?
18	We have neither troops, nor treasury, nor government.1 Are we even in a condition to remonstrate with dignity?
18	What answer shall we give to those who would persuade us that things so unlike resemble each other?
18	What are the MEANS to execute a LEGISLATIVE power but LAWS?
18	What are the advantages promised to counterbalance these disadvantages?
18	What are the characters which practice has stamped upon it?
18	What are the chief sources of expense in every government?
18	What are the proper means of executing such a power, but NECESSARY and PROPER laws?
18	What are to be the objects of federal legislation?
18	What colorable reason could be assigned, in a country so situated, for such vast augmentations of the military force?
18	What difference can it make in point of expense to pay officers of the customs appointed by the State or by the United States?
18	What has occasioned that enormous accumulation of debts with which several of the European nations are oppressed?
18	What is a LEGISLATIVE power, but a power of making LAWS?
18	What is a power, but the ability or faculty of doing a thing?
18	What is the ability to do a thing, but the power of employing the MEANS necessary to its execution?
18	What is the liberty of the press?
18	What is the power of laying and collecting taxes, but a LEGISLATIVE POWER, or a power of MAKING LAWS, to lay and collect taxes?
18	What is the reason on which this proverbial observation is founded?
18	What is the spirit that has in general characterized the proceedings of Congress?
18	What more could be desired by an enlightened and reasonable people?
18	What more desirable or more essential than this quality in the governors of nations?
18	What more natural than that they should be disposed to exclude from the lists such dangerous competitors?
18	What relation is to subsist between the nine or more States ratifying the Constitution, and the remaining few who do not become parties to it?
18	What shall we think of the motives which could induce men of sense to reason in this manner?
18	What signifies a declaration, that"the liberty of the press shall be inviolably preserved"?
18	What then are we to understand by the objection which this paper has combated?
18	What then( it may be asked) is the use of such a provision, if it cease to operate the moment there is an inclination to disregard it?
18	What time shall be requisite to ascertain the violation?
18	What will be the conclusion?
18	What will be the consequence, if we are not able to avail ourselves of the resource in question in its full extent?
18	What would be the probable conduct of the government in such an emergency?
18	What, but that he might be unequal to the task which the Constitution assigns him?
18	What, it may be asked, is the true spirit of the institution itself?
18	What, then, are the distinctive characters of the republican form?
18	When armies are once raised what shall be denominated"keeping them up,"contrary to the sense of the Constitution?
18	Whence is the dreaded augmentation of expense to spring?
18	Where else than in the Senate could have been found a tribunal sufficiently dignified, or sufficiently independent?
18	Where in the name of common- sense, are our fears to end if we may not trust our sons, our brothers, our neighbors, our fellow- citizens?
18	Where is the standard of perfection to be found?
18	Where more desirable or more essential than in the first magistrate of a nation?
18	Whether any part of the powers transferred to the general government be unnecessary or improper?
18	Whether the entire mass of them be dangerous to the portion of jurisdiction left in the several States?
18	Which the end; which the means?
18	Which was the more important, which the less important part?
18	Who are to be the electors of the federal representatives?
18	Who are to be the objects of popular choice?
18	Who can determine what might have been the issue of her late convulsions, if the malcontents had been headed by a Caesar or by a Cromwell?
18	Who can give it any definition which would not leave the utmost latitude for evasion?
18	Who can pretend that commercial imposts are, or would be, alone equal to the present and future exigencies of the Union?
18	Who shall command the allied armies, and from which of them shall he receive his orders?
18	Who shall judge of the continuance of the danger?
18	Who shall settle the terms of peace, and in case of disputes what umpire shall decide between them and compel acquiescence?
18	Who would be the parties?
18	Who would be willing to stake his life and his estate upon the verdict of a jury acting under the auspices of judges who had predetermined his guilt?
18	Who would not prefer that possibility to the unceasing agitations and frequent revolutions which are the continual scourges of petty republics?
18	Why has government been instituted at all?
18	Why not amend it and make it perfect before it is irrevocably established?"
18	Why should we consent to bear more than our proper share of the common burden?
18	Why should we do more in proportion than those who are embarked with us in the same political voyage?
18	Will it be said that the FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES of the Confederation were not within the purview of the convention, and ought not to have been varied?
18	Will it be said that the alterations ought not to have touched the substance of the Confederation?
18	Will it lean in favor of the landed interest, or the moneyed interest, or the mercantile interest, or the manufacturing interest?
18	Will not the landholder know and feel whatever will promote or insure the interest of landed property?
18	With what color of propriety could the force necessary for defense be limited by those who can not limit the force of offense?
18	Would Connecticut and New Jersey long submit to be taxed by New York for her exclusive benefit?
18	Would he on any occasion either have demanded or have received the like humiliation from Spain, or Britain, or any other POWERFUL nation?
18	Would it have been an improvement of the plan, to have united the Supreme Court with the Senate, in the formation of the court of impeachments?
18	Would not similar jealousies arise, and be in like manner cherished?
18	Would not the mere circumstance of freight occasion a considerable deduction?
18	Would not the principal part of its profits be intercepted by the Dutch, as a compensation for their agency and risk?
18	Would she not have been compelled to raise and to maintain a more regular force for the execution of her design?
18	Would the militia, in this supposition, be more ready or more able to support the federal authority than in the case of a general union?
18	Would there not be the greatest reason to apprehend, that error, in the first sentence, would be the parent of error in the second sentence?
18	Would they not be likely to prefer a conduct better adapted to their own immediate aggrandizement?
40613	Or any part thereof?
40613	Prints and pictorial illustrations?
40613	There is absolutely no restriction, as you understand it, to- day?
40613	A fraudulent reprint, for instance?
40613	Accessible and uncovered?
40613	After all, it resolves itself down to a mere question of contract?
40613	All personal baggage is included also?
40613	All right;"To sell, distribute, exhibit, or let for hire,"etc.?
40613	And I am to have an hour after that?
40613	And I would like to know, if you have given the thing any thought, if there is any suggestion you could make?
40613	And he can not give that public performance unless he has paid Mr. Sousa his royalty?
40613	And he would have the further protection of the copyright of the music as it goes into the phonograph, would he not?
40613	And in that respect it would cut out the music- roll proposition altogether?
40613	And it does not extend to any edition that may be produced and sold abroad?
40613	And let it follow your remarks in the record?
40613	And make it a penitentiary offense?
40613	And may I ask also, Mr. Chairman, if it is your intention to continue these proceedings this afternoon?
40613	And no particular association?
40613	And nobody else has published any of your music in six or seven years?
40613	And the cutting out of the right of the individual?
40613	And the gentlemen and concerns you represent desire the law to remain in that condition?
40613	And then such restrictions as may be embodied in that phraseology?
40613	And whatever his brain, and his talent, and his gift has brought forward, you are entitled to use?
40613	And who may secure it?
40613	And why should you not be protected in yours?
40613	And would it cover and prevent a case of covering it up?
40613	And you want it passed just as it is?
40613	And your petition?
40613	Any public performance is prohibited, is it not, by that law?
40613	Are there any other gentlemen to be heard now?
40613	Are there people that can read that roll-- that is, the same as Mr. Sousa can pick up that piece of music there[ indicating] and read that music?
40613	Are these contracts for royalty made to include a possible extension of the copyright?
40613	Are you reading from the printed form of the bill?
40613	Are you satisfied with the bill?
40613	As applied to everybody else?
40613	As to the privilege of importation without the consent of the American copyright proprietor, etc.?
40613	Because it will not let you reproduce works published and copyrighted in the future?
40613	Before 1891?
40613	But any public performance is prohibited by the law of 1897?
40613	But by somebody?
40613	But can anybody tell me, if you please, sir, or will anybody tell us, what those notes are?
40613	But can you think of any other instance where publication would mean something else than those things?
40613	But is it not in the same nature?
40613	But they could not be copyrighted until they were reduced to writing, could they?
40613	But what subjects that he takes in San Francisco can we include as a series and have protected?
40613	But what would be a"series?"
40613	But you do not advertise it as being played by Sousa''s band?
40613	But you think you state their views on the subject?
40613	By how much?
40613	By whom?
40613	Can I say a word, sir, on that point?
40613	Can not the publisher provide against all that by the contract he makes?
40613	Can you call attention to that section?
40613	Can you do that to- day?
40613	Can you finish what you desire to say regarding the provisions of this bill in five minutes additional?
40613	Can you give the citation of the decision that you have mentioned?
40613	Can you give us an illustration of the respect in which the mere copyrighting of the music roll will do all that?
40613	Can you import two copies of an unauthorized edition?
40613	Can you suggest an amendment to carry out your idea in the matter?
40613	Can you tell us whether in case the word"lithograph"is put in there, it might be necessary to put in the words"etching"and"engraving?"
40613	Could it not be on the back and be still uncovered on the back?
40613	Could not a competing talking machine company immediately reproduce those records?
40613	Could not that be said to be a plate within the meaning of this act?
40613	Could you not go right on and publish and sell that book?
40613	Could you not obtain that information at the office of the Librarian?
40613	Did any of you ever inquire of us whether they were doing so?
40613	Did you ask even as to the character of the provisions?
40613	Did you ask us for it?
40613	Did you communicate with the Copyright Office in any way in the matter?
40613	Did you even ask whether such a bill would be likely to include any such provisions?
40613	Did you get any other permission than the purchase of the sheets?
40613	Did you get any special permission to perform?
40613	Did you hear any opposition to this bill from the attorney of the Victor Talking Machine Company?
40613	Did you notice that, Mr. O''Connell?
40613	Did you publish the English book?
40613	Did you suggest"visible"?
40613	Did you then ask leave to come to the next conference?
40613	Do I understand that all the opponents of the provisions of this law relative to talking- machine devices can be heard within one hour?
40613	Do I understand you to contend that the Librarian should be charged with any special duty in that regard, for the registry of the copyright?
40613	Do I understand you to say that that book trust is still in operation?
40613	Do I understand you to say that you have no connection with that band?
40613	Do you appear for the importers?
40613	Do you approve in all respects the bill as introduced in the Senate and House?
40613	Do you contend that it is beyond the power of Congress to make that roll copyrightable?
40613	Do you contend that this provision would apply where the publisher had no interest in the publication beyond the ordinary time of copyright?
40613	Do you desire to be heard by the committee?
40613	Do you feel that you are authorized to speak for the others?
40613	Do you feel that you represent the other importing firms?
40613	Do you imagine that a book would ever be imported by an individual under that provision?
40613	Do you know what the practice of the Treasury Department is now?
40613	Do you mean lately?
40613	Do you mean subsection E?
40613	Do you mean to say that this contract is an improper one to make?
40613	Do you not argue unfairly when you undertake to bring in the Library as against the proposition?
40613	Do you not publish those in series for selling purposes sometimes?
40613	Do you not thereby exclude everything else?
40613	Do you not think, then, if you want that sort of an amendment to section 18 that you should also amend section 4?
40613	Do you object to the word"accessible"here, on line 10?
40613	Do you pay him for it?
40613	Do you play for anyone else besides the Victor Talking Machine Company?
40613	Do you regard anything back behind that as ancient history?
40613	Do you represent the Æolian Company?
40613	Do you think a hundred years is a limited time within the meaning of the Constitution?
40613	Do you think that is necessary to the efficiency of a public library?
40613	Do you think they ought to be printed in the record of the meeting?
40613	Do you think you should do that without compensating him for the genius he displayed?
40613	Do you think, though, that"accessible and uncovered"means putting it on the front of the painting or photograph?
40613	Do you understand that he is not obliged to give notice during the intervening period?
40613	Do you understand that this bill proposes to interfere with existing patent rights?
40613	Do you want to deny any statement that he has made?
40613	Do you wish to deny that you are a musical colossus?
40613	Does any gentleman here think we ought to legislate along that line?
40613	Does each want one hour?
40613	Does he desire to be heard if the committee is in favor of them?
40613	Does not section 13 provide that the man who makes the affidavit shall be guilty of a misdemeanor?
40613	Does the law provide for the registration of the title in advance of the deposit of copies as at present-- a valuable privilege?
40613	Does the new law specifically require all titles to be also in English?
40613	Does this affect records already made?
40613	Does"similar work"include dramatic composition?
40613	Excuse me just a minute, Mr. Ogilvie; will you permit, Mr. Chairman, the register to say a word?
40613	Fifty years?
40613	For instance, Who is an author?
40613	For whom do you appear, Mr. Ogilvie?
40613	From the present interpretation of the law there is not any doubt in the world, then, but what this is a restriction?
40613	Had you no notice that there was going to be a conference?
40613	Has anybody else published any of your music?
40613	Has it the right to change a situation which has existed since 1789?
40613	Has that been settled by the courts?
40613	Have they any credentials to this effect?
40613	Have you any idea?
40613	Have you heard any opposition from the National Phonograph Works-- the Edison Company-- in regard to this bill?
40613	Have you suggested your amendment to this section 14 that some word instead of"accessible"should be used?
40613	Have you the form of an amendment which you propose?
40613	He already has the protection of the copyright on his sheet music, has he not?
40613	He is protected on his writings as you are on your discovery?
40613	He raised the question of jurisdiction in his reply, did he not?
40613	His reply?
40613	How about copyright?
40613	How about engravings?
40613	How about the word"visible?"
40613	How can law prevent Mr. Sousa from making a contract with the Æolian people or any other concern that he may desire to deal with?
40613	How could the licensee have any interest in the copyright beyond the life of it?
40613	How does that effect us?
40613	How far do you wish that protection to extend?
40613	How have the public any means of determining whether"the bulk"of the books has contained a notice of copyright?
40613	How long ago?
40613	How long have you been with him?
40613	How long would you want?
40613	How many can we get into a series and have the court protect us when we come to try a case?
40613	How many desire a hearing?
40613	How many times have you gotten certificates now?
40613	How may the exclusive right to do them be secured?
40613	How much time do you wish, Mr. Davis?
40613	How much time do you wish, Mr. Walker?
40613	How much time do you wish?
40613	How will you describe it in your entry upon the book?
40613	How will you describe the 365 views?
40613	How?
40613	I asked, then,"A fraudulent reprint, for instance?"
40613	I asked,"Can you do that to- day?"
40613	I know that; but the point is, What does the word"publication"here mean?
40613	I mean to say, that can be read by persons understanding the same language?
40613	I suppose the other amendments are simply to follow if the first amendment is approved?
40613	I understand that you think that it ought to be on all authorized editions of books?
40613	I understood your objection on that page 4 and this last one is that the word"print"does not cover a lithograph?
40613	I was going to ask, How do you get Mr. Sousa''s pieces?
40613	I would like to ask you if you understand the practice to be as Mr. Cutter states?
40613	If it could be worked out along the lines suggested, you would not object to that?
40613	If the contract for the copyright does not provide as between the author and the publisher for any renewal, what position would you be in then?
40613	If the copyright had been assigned, the original proprietor would have lost all interest in the copyright; would he not?
40613	If the words"only in pose or composition"were stricken out, would there be a material reduction in your fees?
40613	If this law is passed, could you not do that?
40613	If you introduce that who will decide what is the same general subject, except the courts?
40613	Importations solely by the proprietor of the copyright-- not by individuals?
40613	In a general way, what is your idea?
40613	In all cases?
40613	In both cases?
40613	In other words, it decided that in that case special acts constituted a publication?
40613	In regard to libraries?
40613	In subsection 3 there is still another new restriction, is there not?
40613	In the application for the renewal of the copyright?
40613	In the first place, it seems to me that it would be convenient for us to know-- how many copyright entries do you make in the course of a year?
40613	In what respect?
40613	Is Mr. Davis here?
40613	Is it impossible to suppose that some publishers would do that when they carefully provide against going to the penitentiary for committing perjury?
40613	Is it not ordinarily understood to be the putting on sale of the object?
40613	Is it not time Uncle Sam should arouse?
40613	Is it the criminal remedy that is provided by this bill that would give the protection you need?
40613	Is not that so?
40613	Is not that the purpose of it?
40613	Is not the real reason that if it protects you and other composers, there is an incentive to you to compose?
40613	Is that a matter of printed record?
40613	Is that in this bill or the present law?
40613	Is that question addressed to me?
40613	Is that right?
40613	Is that the reason, now, why you say it will destroy your invention?
40613	Is that your argument?
40613	Is that your point, now?
40613	Is that your understanding-- that it can not be, and that this is an extension of the privilege?
40613	Is the bill as it is drawn at present satisfactory to you?
40613	Is the proposed notice to be given orally, or by publication on a programme, if there is a programme?
40613	Is there a disadvantage in putting it three years?
40613	Is there any definite suggestion that you could make, any definite change, so as to convey your idea?
40613	Is there any doubt that he will await his opportunity for finding a large stock in the hands of the alleged infringer?
40613	Is there any doubt which remedy he will elect?
40613	Is there any government that grants a patent or copyright for more than fifty years that you know of?
40613	Is there any opinion in conflict with that?
40613	Is there not danger in making such definition?
40613	Is there objection to that?
40613	Is your idea of expressing and defining"publication"for the purpose of limiting the word"publication?"
40613	It did not define what publication was any more than that?
40613	It does not affect anything at all that you have done before?
40613	It does not apply to pieces that you play on those machines now, though, even if they are now copyrighted, does it?
40613	It does so in more than two respects, does it not?
40613	It held that that constituted publication?
40613	It is a notation of tone, then?
40613	It is a sufficient injury, so that you think it ought to be restricted?
40613	It is on the sheet, is it?
40613	It is right as it is, as we understand?
40613	It would be the Librarian, so far as your fees were concerned?
40613	It would be the Librarian, would it not?
40613	Just an incident: The talking machine company that pays a singer gets no protection on that record under the law, either, does it?
40613	Just what do you want to strike out?
40613	Just what was that amendment?
40613	Let me ask you this: Do you not do any series work, or is it only that you do not do work in a series under this limitation as to pose or composition?
40613	Mark Twain, for instance, instead of Samuel L. Clemens?
40613	May I ask you your opinion as to whether or not the word"writings,"referred to in article 8 of the Constitution covers these rolls?
40613	May I correct the statement of the Librarian, Mr. Chairman?
40613	May I deny that?
40613	May I have just one moment?
40613	May Mr. Bostwick state as to that, Mr. Chairman?
40613	Might not the courts construe that definition as covering all classes of publications?
40613	Mr. Bonynge said:"Would you prevent the man who sang into your phonograph, or talked into it, from singing or talking into any other?"
40613	Mr. Chairman, I wish to inquire whether the committee is willing to sit also on Saturday to continue the hearings?
40613	Mr. Chairman, may I ask Mr. Bethune to state whether, under the present law, the notice can be put on the mount of a photograph?
40613	Mr. Chairman, may I interrupt one moment?
40613	Mr. Davis, of course you mean that that would happen if you published something after the passage of this act that was copyrighted?
40613	Mr. Putnam, is Mr. Davis here now?
40613	Mr. Register, to what extent is that done?
40613	Mr. Solberg, yesterday, when Mr. Cutter was testifying, I asked him this question:"Can you import two copies of an unauthorized edition?"
40613	Mr. Walker, had you intended to speak specifically about the provisions of this bill?
40613	Mr. Walker, have you in mind the exact language of the Constitution?
40613	My best- known compositions are''Doris,''''Ambolena Snow,''''Douglas Club Two- step,''''Who Will Buy My Roses Red?''
40613	My great song,''Who Will Buy My Roses Red?''
40613	Naturally, I have a perfect right to go around to my friends and get the best offer I can, have I not?
40613	No particular establishment?
40613	No; but suppose the person injured lives in the Philippine Islands?
40613	Not by anybody connected with the Congress?
40613	Not the exclusion of the entire fee?
40613	Now, if it is on the back, is the word"visible"descriptive?
40613	Now, is Mr. Sousa present?
40613	Now, right there, without any intention to be facetious, do you not think that fifty years is sufficient?
40613	Now, you are a lawyer?
40613	Of the entire paragraph?
40613	Of what character?
40613	On page 16?
40613	On page 2?
40613	On what page?
40613	Or of the Sandwich Islands, or Porto Rico?
40613	P.S.--Will you please send me an extra copy of the bill, or two if you have them to spare?
40613	Page 16 of the library print?
40613	Protection in what way?
40613	Section 21?
40613	Section 25, sir?
40613	So that if you strike out"under permission given by the proprietor of the American copyright"it satisfies them?
40613	So that it would read"his violation?"
40613	So that that paragraph of that section as it stands is satisfactory to you?
40613	So that we will get"El Capitan"from the phonographs in various places?
40613	Subdivision(_ g_) on page 2?
40613	Suppose in the case you have referred to you began to publish this book without any knowledge that it was protected by copyright?
40613	Suppose the bill should provide for the life of the contract, together with any extension thereof?
40613	Suppose the church bought it?
40613	Suppose we define publication in the manner you suggest, would there not be difficulty in cases not covered by that definition?
40613	Suppose we except those views?
40613	Thank you; and may I submit later the evidences and proofs to which I have referred?
40613	That book had two different titles, you say?
40613	That is a restriction, then?
40613	That is page 12, line 18, is it not, Mr. Chaney?
40613	That is so as to that particular thing, but if there is someone who wishes to be heard on some other point, why not hear him now?
40613	That is still another restriction?
40613	That is the decision that has already been put in the record?
40613	That is your position, is it not?
40613	That is, there was an English publication under one title and an American publication under a different title?
40613	That is,"To make, sell, distribute, or let for hire any device, contrivance,"etc.?
40613	That machine engraves lines corresponding to what?
40613	That minority is a very strong one, is it not?
40613	That starts in on page 4 and concludes on page 14?
40613	That was prior to 1891?
40613	That was the decision that was distributed yesterday?
40613	That would protect the artists?
40613	That you should get those books immediately?
40613	The English book was copyrighted in the United States?
40613	The effect of your argument is, then, to limit the word to something that can be read by anybody?
40613	The fundamental provisions of the copyright law are therefore these four: What is the subject- matter?
40613	The individuals are cut out, are they not?
40613	The life is fourteen years?
40613	The musician may memorize that music, and may entertain an audience with it, but he can not sing it into a phonograph; is that it?
40613	The number of books is reduced from two to one?
40613	The publisher replies:"Very well; you want me to join in the securing of that extension, do you?"
40613	The statement is that you have a band that plays into these instruments, and you, I understand, have denied that?
40613	The works that are issued carry a notice, do they not?
40613	The Æolian Company, as the law stood, did not have to pay to musical publishers a cent?
40613	Then it is paid for when you get these records?
40613	Then what concern is it to us, who are engaged in framing this bill, about that contract?
40613	Then why change the penalty in this law?
40613	Then would the competing concerns be able to use their instruments at all?
40613	Then you understand that Mr. Cutter is right in what he says?
40613	Then you would favor the defendant rather than the complainant in such a case?
40613	Then you would insert, after the word"prints,"in line 4, on page 4, the word"lithographs?"
40613	Then you would strike out all of section 15?
40613	Then your suggested amendment,"uncovered,"does not meet this objection, which you now state, at all?
40613	Then, in the interest of the working people of the United States, you would prefer to have the law left just as it is now?
40613	Then, is it not high time that we were giving it a little wider construction than that?
40613	Then, is it understood that I am to speak first to- morrow morning?
40613	Then, it is simply a question of your receiving the royalty that you think you are entitled to?
40613	There is absolutely no restriction, as you understand it to- day?
40613	They are protected in their inventions?
40613	They ask us"just what entries did we make in May last?"
40613	This is not a case of ignorance of the law; you think it is a case of ignorance of fact?
40613	This would allow you to import, however, but one book, whereas you have had the privilege of importing two?
40613	To what extent do you now issue certificates?
40613	To what section of this bill do you now refer?
40613	Under existing law is the proprietor of the American copyright seriously injured by these importations?
40613	Under existing law, is it necessary for the manufacturer to do more than I have stated?
40613	Under that word"writing"you want to exclude such people as Mr. Sousa entirely from its operation in respect to self- playing musical instruments?
40613	Under the old law, I mean?
40613	Under what section of this law?
40613	Upon the third point,"How may the right be secured?"
40613	Vested rights?
40613	Was that the proposition that is now a part of the bill?
40613	Was that your idea?
40613	Was the exhibition given for hire, for profit?
40613	Was the subject- matter different?
40613	Was there anything inherently wrong in that?
40613	Was this matter taken up at the conferences?
40613	We would understand, would we not, that that was a practical prohibition of importations by individuals?
40613	Well, why should you object to the word"uncovered"--"accessible and uncovered?"
40613	Well, will you tell me what this means--"shall not invalidate the copyright?"
40613	Well,"this bill affects the future,"but has it the right to affect the future?
40613	Were there any importations before 1881?
40613	Were there any importations of such books?
40613	Were they identically the same book?
40613	Were you present at the hearing yesterday?
40613	What are the acts?
40613	What are the expenses of the office?
40613	What are the new remedies given to the artists by the provisions of this bill?
40613	What are you referring to; what term?
40613	What change would you suggest in subsection G?
40613	What changes in this bill do you suggest?
40613	What do you say about the case of the gentleman who just preceded you-- the lawsuit into which he got himself?
40613	What do you say to that suggestion, Mr. Putnam and Mr. Solberg?
40613	What do you say to the amendment suggested by the gentleman who last spoke?
40613	What do you understand that to mean?
40613	What do you understand the word"works"to mean in section 4?
40613	What effect does this section have?
40613	What happens?
40613	What is fair use?
40613	What is it that makes that graphophonic record valuable?
40613	What is publication in the case of works not reproduced in copies for sale?
40613	What is the length of your contract that you usually make?
40613	What is the longest period granted by any government, that you recall, for a copyright?
40613	What is the meaning of it?
40613	What is the necessity for three years?
40613	What is the necessity of an advance in the fee?
40613	What is the object of your having those certificates?
40613	What is the protection by the terms of this bill that is given you?
40613	What is the reason assigned for uniting these two fees in one; do you know?
40613	What is the section?
40613	What is this monopoly?
40613	What is written on the sheet?
40613	What is your first subheading there that you are going to talk from?
40613	What is your position, then, if that is not your position?
40613	What is your suggestion on that?
40613	What is your suggestion?
40613	What is your suggestion?
40613	What makes the difference?
40613	What page is that?
40613	What provision is there in this law to reimburse me for having innocently done that which, under the law, apparently I had a perfect right to do?
40613	What reason is given for that request?
40613	What section has that effect?
40613	What section is that, Mr. Remich?
40613	What section?
40613	What section?
40613	What value would these various records have if my march was not on them-- if I had never written that march?
40613	What was his reply, if you remember?
40613	What was his reply-- raising questions of law?
40613	What was the answer that he got from the office of copyright?
40613	What was the argument or the reasoning of the court in the latter decision?
40613	What was their object in getting a decision of the court which would force them to pay large sums to the musical publishers?
40613	What we would like to know is, would it enable you to enter a great many of these articles under one fee that you now enter separately?
40613	What were the gross receipts of the Copyright Office for the last fiscal year?
40613	What will be the result if these features of the bill are put through?
40613	What would you file in the copyright office?
40613	When it says that it shall only apply to works published and copyrighted in the future?
40613	When you say,"To any book published abroad,"beginning on page 16,"with the authorization of the author or copyright proprietor,"what does that mean?
40613	Where is that in section 18, that you may copyright under an assumed name?
40613	Where is the section that prescribes the form?
40613	Where is your next point?
40613	Where should it be?
40613	Where the copyright has run out?
40613	Where would you put it?
40613	Whereabouts?
40613	Which title did you publish under?
40613	Who does?
40613	Who is the gentleman that desires to be heard further?
40613	Who is the next witness?
40613	Who is your publisher?
40613	Whom do you represent?
40613	Whom do you represent?
40613	Whom do you represent?
40613	Whom do you represent?
40613	Whom do you represent?
40613	Whose consent should be required?
40613	Why does the Victor Talking Machine Company come here with such a virtuous show of regard for the author, and say they have no objection to this?
40613	Why is not the representative of the Edison Company-- the National Phonograph Works-- here opposing this bill?
40613	Why is that so?
40613	Why not leave that the old two- year limit?
40613	Why not, Mr. Davis?
40613	Why should he?
40613	Why should it be extended to three years?
40613	Why should less be required of the claimant to copyright than is required of the claimant to patent right?
40613	Why should less proof be required of one claiming copyright as proprietor?
40613	Why should not the author claiming copyright be subject to a similar requirement?
40613	Why should this new provision be inserted?
40613	Why should we leave it out?
40613	Why should you put a music roll into the category of paintings, statues, or sculptures at$ 10, rather than into the other category?
40613	Why that exception?
40613	Why, Mr. Chairman and gentlemen, should you impose a penalty of$ 10?
40613	Will you describe them as 365 views of the churches of Rome, or will you specify them under one head?
40613	Will you gentlemen give them that opportunity?
40613	Will you not put it on the record at this point?
40613	Will you not state your name and who you represent?
40613	Will you please state your name, Mr. Bowker, your residence, and whom you represent?
40613	Will you send that to the committee?
40613	Will you state where you find that in that section?
40613	Will you suggest an amendment that will meet your idea?
40613	Will you tell us, briefly, how you would strengthen the present law?
40613	With that stricken out, the people you represent would not object to sections 26, 27, 28, and 29?
40613	With the consent of the copyright proprietor?
40613	Without any consideration whatever?
40613	Would it cover the back?
40613	Would it not be a considerable inconvenience to secure the permission of the proprietor of the copyright?
40613	Would it run up into thousands?
40613	Would not the copyrighting of this phonograph record give the musician, say Mr. Sousa, double protection?
40613	Would that apply to a magazine picture-- a picture in a magazine that had the notice on the back of the original?
40613	Would that be satisfactory to the people whom you represent?
40613	Would that preclude any part of that edition being imported?
40613	Would you like to amend that?
40613	Would you not think that would give the publisher an undue advantage over the author?
40613	Would you object to Mr. Sousa taking your invention and combining it with his composition and putting it upon the market?
40613	Would you think the terms of this bill, then, are right?
40613	Yes; but that very clause gives the same incentive and protection to the musical author, does it not, as to the inventor?
40613	Yes; but there are various other restrictions embodied in the bill, are there not?
40613	You accept that as an addition to your amendment?
40613	You advertise it as a march by Sousa as a composer, but played by somebody else as the executant?
40613	You allow your name to be used all over the country?
40613	You are a publisher, are you?
40613	You are aware of the fact that if you undertake to define"publication"you do limit it to whatever you say it is?
40613	You are going to file a copy of it, are you not?
40613	You are really talking against your own interests as a publisher just now?
40613	You are referring simply to section 13?
40613	You are satisfied with the bill as it stands?
40613	You can file the proof, can you not, Mr. Walker?
40613	You could hardly set the right up at auction, could you?
40613	You could not put it on the back, where it would be uncovered?
40613	You did not understand that it was supposed that the works issued were to be exempt from the notice upon them of copyright, did you?
40613	You do not mean that?
40613	You do not object to the 50 cents for the fee and 50 cents more for the certificate?
40613	You do not understand, though, Mr. Davis, that this act will destroy any of your vested rights at present, do you?
40613	You have an interest in the band and receive profit from it?
40613	You have how many minutes?
40613	You have no idea of being protected any more than any other concern?
40613	You make an entire distinction, as I understand it?
40613	You mean also to include, I suppose, a brief expression from these people as to their objections, and to what their objections related?
40613	You mean, then, that section 3 is the section that interferes with them?
40613	You object to that entire part of the bill, do you?
40613	You refer to section 13?
40613	You suggest inserting after"original""before publication, exhibition, or offering for sale?"
40613	You suggest that we leave out this last proviso absolutely?
40613	You think it ought to be against the law for some people to attempt to do it, do you not, Mr. Sousa?
40613	You think it should be inserted there after the word"print,"again?
40613	You think that includes it?
40613	You think the language of the bill as it is is too broad?
40613	You turn to any book, and what do you find on the page immediately following?
40613	You wait three years instead of fifty, and where would we be?
40613	You want it to read"accessible and uncovered"?
40613	You want the word"accessible"kept in just as it is now?
40613	You would be satisfied without its amendment?
40613	You would confine that to some other official, then; would you?
40613	You would not object to paying a reasonable royalty if that right was given to all upon the same terms?
40613	You would put in the word"uncovered?"
40613	You would strike out"recoveries"and insert"suits?"
40613	Your suggestion, then, is to reduce the fee prescribed in section 60 from$ 1 to 50 cents?
40851	Is there any alternative,says this printer,"between an abandonment of the constitution and resistance?"
40851	What other form of government, indeed, can so well deserve our esteem and love? 40851 relying with perfect confidence in the Executive"--is this the language of the constitution, as it respects any man?
40851	218; amendment will defeat the bill, 218; shall the territory remain defenceless?
40851	453; all the evidence necessary should be obtained, 453; extraordinary resolution-- was the President clerk of the court?
40851	679; what evidence that the Intendant is not authorized by the Spanish or French Government?
40851	681; what is the state of things?
40851	69; this country not equal to support a navy, 69; how can such a navy, be manned?
40851	A question was then taken in the following words: Does the matter so communicated require secrecy?
40851	Admitting it, I asked then, and I ask now, with what propriety it could be used, even in that sense, in the resolution referred to?
40851	Admitting there was such a law, what could the House do?
40851	Admitting they could hold it, what security would they have for their commerce?
40851	After knowing these facts, will gentlemen have the hardihood to call this a hasty measure?
40851	Again, if such a Navy were created, how was it to be manned?
40851	Against whom they were to be employed?
40851	Against whom, then, are we to arm?
40851	Although they may differ in political opinion, as many of us do, is that any reason we should attempt to destroy their reputation?
40851	Although this all might be mere matter of opinion, would it not come within the meaning of the law in question?
40851	Am I so to consider it?
40851	And are gentlemen to be here accused for exercising the constitutional right of election according to the conviction of their own judgments?
40851	And are not the emigrations composed of such as require the prompt assistance of the law, to preserve among them regularity?
40851	And are not these men property?
40851	And are the maxims of experience to become false, when applied to our fate?
40851	And are the people to be told that this is a trifling question?
40851	And are they pledged for the payment of the public debt?
40851	And are they, therefore, in this House to be confounded with each other?
40851	And are we not in war?
40851	And are we to be told from the house- tops, that the only use of elections is to promote, not public good, but public mischief?
40851	And can it be justifiable in the eyes of men, who believe there is nothing so precious or important as national honor?
40851	And can there be a greater, a more patriotic purpose than this?
40851	And could a potent State be alarmed by the unfounded claim of a single person?
40851	And do the citizens of the United States, he asked, wish their First Magistrate to be placed in this situation?
40851	And does not the doctrine of our opponents prove that, at every change of administration, the number of your judges are probably to be doubled?
40851	And during the time that Holland was separated from the dominion of Spain, was war declared in consequence of any nation trading with Holland?
40851	And has England gained nothing by the war?
40851	And here, sir, let it be asked, why should a Government that means well, or is confident in its uprightness and ability, ever fear the press?
40851	And here, sir, let me ask, are not these privileges all that are necessary?
40851	And how can the truth of things which can not be proved by evidence, be determined by evidence?
40851	And how has he proved this?
40851	And how is it to be effected?
40851	And if granted, why not grant it without assigning reasons, as well as with assigning them?
40851	And if so, could any thing afford a more lasting cause for war than an act of this kind?
40851	And if the money is to be raised by taxes, to what objects can we turn our attention?
40851	And if they are, does that committee mean to impose upon this House, as upon the people of some parts of the Union?
40851	And if they can hear in them, can not the stenographers also?
40851	And if they could delegate the power of raising an army to the PRESIDENT, why not do the same with respect to the power of raising taxes?
40851	And if they have no objection, why go into a Committee of the Whole; which, if gone into, must be with closed doors?
40851	And if they violate the law, where can we apply for redress but to our courts of justice?
40851	And if this be important in the general course of things, is it not, under present circumstances, indispensable?
40851	And if to either sum, can we with propriety dispense with the internal taxes?
40851	And in these circumstances, said he, are the people of the United States to be led on from step to step, until they are irrevocably involved in war?
40851	And is not the tenure as completely impaired thereby, as if the other had been taken away also?
40851	And is not this most proper?
40851	And is the irritation consequent upon the laying of taxes worn off?
40851	And may they not, instead of giving their judges two thousand dollars a year, give them two hundred thousand?
40851	And must the Executive in every such case make a new appointment?
40851	And now that we have gained it, shall we fall from our honor?
40851	And on the question on the second division, to wit: Whether so much as provides that the third article shall be expunged, shall stand?
40851	And ought a man to be permitted to slander the Government and not an individual?
40851	And ought his descendants to be more hardly dealt with because their father had the generosity and magnanimity not to make the demand?
40851	And shall not we, as a nation, thank him for keeping us from a state of war?
40851	And shall not we, with our great and increasing resources, and the peculiar advantages of our situation, be able to effect still more?
40851	And shall we hesitate?
40851	And shall we now, when there is no right reason for it, lay hold of the public Treasury, and lavish away$ 14,000?
40851	And shall we, for this reason, monopolize a revenue upon it?
40851	And then, Is there a Seminary so near the spot contemplated, as to make it hostile in this House to encourage this University?
40851	And though we were a commercial Republic, was it not necessary to take care of the agricultural interest?
40851	And upon what terms are we to cope with the powers of Europe with respect to any navy?
40851	And was Rigaud punished by France for thus exercising his power or not?
40851	And was it to be considered, he asked, that they enjoyed the powers committed to them in their own right, as barons of empire, as sovereign despots?
40851	And was that salary, he asked, near so valuable now as it was when fixed?
40851	And was this, he asked, a subject of regret?
40851	And what are these cases?
40851	And what courts?
40851	And what have they got to do?
40851	And what have they said?
40851	And what object or consideration more pleasing than this can be presented to the human mind?
40851	And what objection could there be to the inquiry?
40851	And what was all this power that so much alarmed the gentleman from Massachusetts?
40851	And what was the object?
40851	And what will be the result of this?
40851	And what would be the remedy if he should refuse to comply?
40851	And what, he asked, did these expenses amount to?
40851	And what, in either case, would become of this boasted protection of the people against themselves?
40851	And when we all agree in this, whence the necessity of calling up the animosities of party?
40851	And whether help can be extended by law to the one, and consistently refused to the other?
40851	And whether it had not been in the contemplation of that gentleman, as well as others, to pay as much as they could yearly?
40851	And whether none of them in the Legislature never voted for the resolutions about the western land, nor about post- offices and post- roads?
40851	And whether the Executive is not hastening it?
40851	And who are the judges?
40851	And why is all this to be done?
40851	And why shall our judges not ride the circuits?
40851	And why were they told this?
40851	And will gentlemen act upon this as a sufficient reason for their conduct?
40851	And would any gentleman say it was not right to defend our vessels against pirates?
40851	And would any one say that it would be proper to rise without providing a military defence for the country?
40851	And would it not be extraordinary, he asked, if, before they received these statements, they were to appoint a committee of inquiry?
40851	And would not the opening of intercourse with such a place, by relieving the distresses of France, defeat the original intention of the law?
40851	And would this, he asked, be doing honor to the Republican Government?
40851	And would you take up arms with a millstone hanging around your neck?
40851	And yet, after being told of these designs, shall we sit with our arms folded, and make no defence?
40851	And, because Congress had a right to enact such a law, would gentlemen say it was for the benefit of trade?
40851	And, if Mr. Gerry had powers to treat, how could it be criminal to say that he might treat?
40851	And, on motion to agree thereto, a motion was made for the previous question, to wit:"Shall the main question be now put?"
40851	And, on the question on the first division, to wit: Whether so much as provides that the second article shall be expunged, shall stand?
40851	And, on the question on the fourth division, to wit: Whether that part shall stand which provides a limitation of time to its duration?
40851	And, on the question on the third division, to wit: Whether that part shall stand which restrains it from operating against former treaties?
40851	And, on the question,"Shall these words stand?"
40851	And, on the question,"Will the Senate advise and consent to the adoption of this article?"
40851	And, said Mr. G., do we really rely upon this?
40851	And, whether to deny it, in this instance, would not be to interfere with that provision of the constitution?
40851	Any thing to ruin the country?
40851	Are a majority of this House so degraded, so mean, so destitute of honor or morality, as to act at the nod of a President?
40851	Are gentlemen disposed to wage war in support of this principle?
40851	Are gentlemen then afraid to trust to the discretion of the President?
40851	Are gentlemen unwilling to indemnify for such losses?
40851	Are gentlemen unwilling to trust themselves, lest their own consciences should compel them to an act of justice?
40851	Are gentlemen''s opinions and language thus to be circumscribed?
40851	Are honorable gentlemen prepared to accept peace on such terms?
40851	Are not its members acting under a responsibility to public opinion, which can and will check their aberrations from duty?
40851	Are not the jurisdictions of those courts separate and distinct?
40851	Are not those who voted against it fairly to be considered as enemies to the law?
40851	Are not, said Mr. G., these papers important to the House?
40851	Are not, said Mr. O., the galleries constructed for the express purpose of hearing?
40851	Are our arguments to fly from the mouths of our cannon?
40851	Are our means equal to hers?
40851	Are there any words in that instrument which give the President expressly the power of removing any officer at pleasure?
40851	Are there words in the English language more explicit?
40851	Are these approaches to revolution and Jacobinic domination, to be observed with the eye of meek submission?
40851	Are they apprehensive lest he should communicate that which is improper?
40851	Are they not intended for the good people of the United States?
40851	Are they paid exclusively by the wealthy and the luxurious part of the community?
40851	Are they prepared to repeal the act to which I now refer?
40851	Are they willing to let it rest, and lose it?
40851	Are we bound hand and foot that we must be witnesses of these deadly thrusts at our liberty?
40851	Are we never to be clear of these alarms?
40851	Are we then to resort to the ultimate reason of kings?
40851	Are we to be the unresisting spectators of these exertions to destroy all that we hold dear?
40851	Are we to be told by the gentleman from Virginia, there is no occasion for this call; that we have information enough?
40851	Are we to form an exception to the general principles of nature, and to all the examples of history?
40851	Are we to legislate for succeeding ages?
40851	Are we to see all these acts practised against the repose of our country, and remain passive?
40851	Are we to suppose he is unwilling to inform us what they are?
40851	Are we to suppose the Executive has not been vigilant in ascertaining the circumstances attending this event?
40851	Are we valiant?
40851	Are we wise?
40851	Are you certain that they will wait the end of negotiation?
40851	As to the State which he represented, he would ask if the first blood that had been spilled after that shed at Boston was not in North Carolina?
40851	At a time when the enemy''s vessels are within our own jurisdiction, are we to withhold the necessary instructions to the commanders of our vessels?
40851	At that day, did we hastily go to war?
40851	Attacked and insulted as we had been, do we now, asked Mr. D., call for war?
40851	Because they have been once injured with impunity, shall we turn our backs upon them for ever?
40851	Because, as our opponents would fain have it believed, we are insensible to the vast interest affected by the obstruction of the Mississippi?
40851	Besides, has he the power to do so, in the manner then suggested by the gentleman from Virginia by taking possession of New Orleans?
40851	Besides, said Mr. B., were the rates of compensation, when first established, established upon this principle?
40851	Besides, said Mr. G., could it be expected that six or ten frigates could convoy all our vessels?
40851	Besides, what is the population of the Southern States?
40851	Bound to obey what law?
40851	Brought to this dilemma, said he, which side will you take?
40851	But I ask gentlemen to be candid, and tell me whether they are at this time equally divided?
40851	But an extreme case is put; a bill of attainder is passed; are the judges to support the constitution or the law?
40851	But are printers at liberty to tell lies about our transactions?
40851	But are we always to act by precedent?
40851	But are you not the guardians of the public treasure?
40851	But by what energy is the constitution to be destroyed?
40851	But can it be necessary to give this Senate any other assurance than my word?
40851	But can liberty, such as we understand and enjoy, exist in societies where the few only have property, and the many are both ignorant and licentious?
40851	But can you examine each distinct case?
40851	But could America lay up her ships, and say she would open her ports to all nations?
40851	But did the framers of the constitution stop here?
40851	But did the gentleman suppose that a war with France could be flattering to pride or ambition?
40851	But does this bill, said Mr. S., contemplate any such thing?
40851	But gentlemen say, where are your expenses?
40851	But had Spain a right to make this cession without our consent?
40851	But he would ask if this were the case, if it would not lead directly to war?
40851	But how are these objects effected?
40851	But how did the case really stand?
40851	But how did we vote on the motion for agreeing to the following clause?
40851	But how is that gentleman to have foundation for his reflections until a bill is drawn?
40851	But how shall we account for the exception which is now exhibited to this hitherto received maxim?
40851	But how was this law adopted?
40851	But how?
40851	But how?
40851	But if the evidence was not reported, how could he say that all the witnesses might not again be called before the House?
40851	But if the gentleman insisted opinions could not be false, how would he get rid of the conclusion?
40851	But if, on the contrary, they coolly looked into the petition, and reported thereon, would it not stop the mouths of these people?
40851	But if, sir, they have offended against the constitution or laws of the country, why are they not impeached?
40851	But is it unconstitutional to assign new duties to officers already existing?
40851	But is this Legislative power in Great Britain usurped by construction?
40851	But is this the peace which we ought to seek?
40851	But no, said the gentlemen,"We will not have it examined into, because it will make us out to be as_ black_ as the petitioners themselves?"
40851	But of what avail will this be, when Congress may take it away at any moment?
40851	But ought this to be said of the subject under consideration?
40851	But should we persist under such a possibility of mistake, what do we risk?
40851	But suppose it was now in possession of a foreign power, would Georgia attempt to drive them from it?
40851	But suppose, said Mr. S., this independence were to take place, would all the danger to this country actually take place which has been stated?
40851	But suppose, sir, you agree to divide these States, where is the boundary to be?
40851	But supposing there are yet a number of them, what better use can our public armed vessels be put to than to go after them?
40851	But the gentleman from South Carolina says, this is the cheapest mode of defence; but does the gentleman prove this?
40851	But the question arises, whether a violation of the treaties on the part of France is, of itself, sufficient for setting them aside?
40851	But this settlement is now objected to, and what is to be done?
40851	But was it necessary these persons should at once become entitled to take a part in the concerns of our Government?
40851	But was this the sense of the country?
40851	But were they always to expect to have a PRESIDENT who would give his services to his country?
40851	But what have we to do with their domestic broils?
40851	But what inducement will there be to moneyed men to lend money, except a permanent revenue be made the security?
40851	But what is the fact?
40851	But what security have we for the truth of the declaration?
40851	But what was all this to the United States?
40851	But what was now to be done?
40851	But what was the issue of this negotiation?
40851	But what was the issue of this proposition?
40851	But what was the result of experience?
40851	But what were the terms upon which they proposed to cede it?
40851	But what, said Mr. G., is the language of this section?
40851	But what, sir, did the gentleman mean by his X, Y, Z?
40851	But when?
40851	But where did that gentleman learn that Holland has no navy?
40851	But where is the evil complained of?
40851	But where was the blame, if any could attach?
40851	But where was the crime, the offence, or the impropriety, of the conduct ascribed to the Executive, if it had been adopted?
40851	But wherefore this exhibition of a zeal so inordinate as to arrogate to itself all sensibility to the national welfare?
40851	But who will say that the crew of a British frigate on the high seas, are within the peace of the United States?
40851	But why have they trusted to the imaginary collision of sentiment between the Governor and Intendant of New Orleans?
40851	But why is she in that situation?
40851	But why speak of British inhumanity, if not to embarrass this bill?
40851	But why was the army mentioned on this occasion, unless to fore- warn us of the fate which awaits them, and to tell us that their days are numbered?
40851	But why, he asked, do these men come here in a body?
40851	But why, say gentlemen, fix precisely one Supreme Court, and leave the rest to Legislative discretion?
40851	But why?
40851	But will it be pretended that a person can commit misprision of treason who can not commit treason itself?
40851	But will the House thus be acted upon?
40851	But will the gentleman say, that whenever we ask information, we conclude upon measures?
40851	But will this alter the justness of my position?
40851	But would this have been right?
40851	But would this have done?
40851	But, as this is not the case, as we are only asked to permit its encouragement, by allowing these people to receive benefactions, how can we refuse?
40851	But, he asked if the gentleman from Virginia knew the reason why this amount to France appeared so large?
40851	But, he asked if the loss we sustained for the want of a naval power could be estimated?
40851	But, he would ask them, if, independent of land with its improvements, they possessed any other species of property which could not be eluded?
40851	But, in any view, are the sins of the former judges to be fastened upon the new Judicial system?
40851	But, it is said, will you suffer a printer to abuse his fellow- citizens with impunity, ascribing his conduct to the very worst of motives?
40851	But, said he, shall we fear that we shall be called upon to pay a few more just debts?
40851	But, say gentlemen, where will you find revenue?
40851	But, sir, are the Secretaries unworthy of confidence?
40851	But, sir, are we not as deeply interested in the true exposition of the constitution, as the judges can be?
40851	But, supposing the law constitutional, is the crime an infamous one?
40851	But, taking things as they are, what course, on this point, is most fair and tolerant?
40851	But, to return, was there any thing criminal in that paragraph?
40851	But, upon what ground, said Mr. G., do the advocates of this report prove that 11 is not three- fourths of 14?
40851	But, what was the fact?
40851	But, why had it been so?
40851	But, why two, Mr. B. queried, rather than three?
40851	By the laws of what nation would the contract be governed?
40851	By what are those armies to be opposed?
40851	By what authority can any court render such a judgment?
40851	By what inspiration could the gentleman form a judgment now?
40851	By what law then would such a contract be governed?
40851	By what means was this to be accomplished?
40851	By whom has this outrage been offered?
40851	Can I, said Mr. J., represent as effectually Massachusetts, or Vermont, as Pennsylvania?
40851	Can any other meaning be applied to the words"from time to time?"
40851	Can any thing essential, any thing more than mere ornament and decoration, be added to this by robes and diamonds?
40851	Can gentlemen hear these things and lie quietly on their pillows?
40851	Can he commit and imprison without a trial?
40851	Can he prove that £10,000,000 sterling is only the third part of the expense of defence, as he says?
40851	Can he then be trusted with the government of others?
40851	Can it be any thing more than the right of uttering and doing what is not injurious to others?
40851	Can it be done without power?
40851	Can it be expected that any country will be peopled as fast, from a nation at the distance of three thousand miles, as our Western country has been?
40851	Can it be possible, sir, that the gentleman was really serious when he talked about an injury to women and children?
40851	Can it be shown, or even said, that the judgment of the court was a false construction of the constitution?
40851	Can it be, that an act, which, if perpetrated by an individual, would be robbery, can be justifiable in a nation?
40851	Can it have this effect?
40851	Can it mean that an office may exist, although its duties are extinct?
40851	Can it mean, in short, that the shadow, to wit, the judge, can remain, when the substance, to wit, the office, is removed?
40851	Can it mean, that his tenure should be limited by behaving well in an office which did not exist?
40851	Can not the logical talents of the gentleman from Massachusetts( Mr. BACON) distinguish between information and measures?
40851	Can stones show gratitude?
40851	Can the honorable gentleman be serious in all this?
40851	Can the usefulness or convenience of any acquisition justify us in taking from another by force what we have no sort of right to?
40851	Can this admission make us responsible for the conduct of men we do not know, and over whom we have no control?
40851	Can we expect any thing from their justice, or, rather, have we not every thing to expect from their vengeance, if not prepared to meet it?
40851	Can we expect this, said Mr. N.?
40851	Can you impair its force by impeaching the motives of any member who voted for it?
40851	Could any gentleman conceive that these were not too great powers to be intrusted to any State whatever?
40851	Could any gentleman pretend to say that no inference might be drawn from this source and the concomitant facts?
40851	Could any man desire to place the citizens of the District in such a state?
40851	Could any office be at the same time in the possession of two persons?
40851	Could any possible inconvenience accrue from allowing him to obtain the information he desired?
40851	Could gentlemen be serious in making this objection?
40851	Could gentlemen hear it and not shudder?
40851	Could he say we were at peace with them now?
40851	Could he use the public force to redress our wrongs?
40851	Could his successor, on the receipt of his commission, exercise the functions of judge, prior to the resignation of the former incumbent?
40851	Could it be necessary then to_ increase_ courts when suits were_ decreasing_?
40851	Could it be necessary to multiply judges, when their duties were diminishing?
40851	Could it then be supposed these gentlemen could, in this instance, so change their opinion?
40851	Could it, then, with any reason be called premature to act upon such information?
40851	Could the President proceed further, even if he thought more vigorous measures proper and expedient?
40851	Could the Speaker desire this?
40851	Could the framers of the constitution intend to guarantee, as a sacred principle, the liberty of lying against the Government?
40851	Could they alone go to war with France and Spain?
40851	Could they declare a law of North Carolina null and void?
40851	Could they fear injustice when opposed to a feeble individual?
40851	Could they hold Orleans, were they to take possession of it, without the aid of the United States?
40851	Could this be correct?
40851	Could this be liberty?
40851	Could this give offence, because we feel pleasure in being at peace?
40851	Could we refuse a tribute of respect to a man who had served his country so much?
40851	Could, then, gentlemen talk of moral obligation, and say that this was a just debt?
40851	Dangerous to Europe and to the world, what will be the effect of a great increase of that power?
40851	Did a nation ever make a declaration that it was not at war?
40851	Did any thing appear in the conduct of the French Directory to show that our Ministers were not possessed of ample powers?
40851	Did gentlemen mean that if we should make use of force against lawless violence, it is war?
40851	Did gentlemen want an age to express an opinion which every member feels-- which the whole nation feels?
40851	Did he carry his purpose into effect?
40851	Did he mean to set all slaves at liberty, or receive petitions from all?
40851	Did he not embark his all for this country?
40851	Did he then ask any thing which was unreasonable or improper?
40851	Did his constituents, he asked, wish this?
40851	Did not he know that the doctrine applied to the Senate as well as to that House?
40851	Did not our situation, and the circumstances in which we stand, compel us to turn our attention to this object?
40851	Did not the United States trade with all the nations of the earth?
40851	Did not the gentleman know that the most solemn decision had taken place last session on this subject, by a large majority?
40851	Did not the gentleman''s friends immediately state the impropriety of passing those resolutions?
40851	Did not the insolvent laws of the Southern States hold out the same allurements to fraud as the general bankrupt law?
40851	Did not the members of the convention know that a great quantity of public treasure would be drawn together into this place?
40851	Did not the silence of the bill on this point show the ignorance of gentlemen?
40851	Did not this go to sanction a report which was as false and malignant as even jacobinism could invent?
40851	Did the acts of cession by the States, and of acceptance by Congress, take away the jurisdiction of those States, and vest it in Congress?
40851	Did the city afford the Government a defence?
40851	Did the gentleman mean to insinuate, that this war was invited by the United States?
40851	Did the gentleman suppose that the number would be so great as to make a demand on their seats?
40851	Did the military send its aid?
40851	Did the people of America vest all power in the Legislature?
40851	Did the people?
40851	Did the petition go any farther than this?
40851	Did they attempt to counteract the Executive?
40851	Did they imagine that, without the expression of a murmur by them, the mover would himself rise and oppose his own motion?
40851	Did they know how far we would reduce the Army, the Navy, or the Judiciary?
40851	Did they not consider the number of persons attached to the Government worthy of the special regard of the national Legislature?
40851	Did they not hold them under the Spanish Government?
40851	Did they rest here the most important branch of our Government?
40851	Did they risk on these grammatical niceties the fate of America?
40851	Did those gentlemen consider what it was to deprive the country of a rich mine of ship timber?
40851	Did we drive them to the measures that made such immense expenditures of the public money necessary?
40851	Did we object to a syllable contained in this part of the resolution?
40851	Did we refuse our assent?
40851	Did we then hesitate?
40851	Did we then make war?
40851	Did we then wait for foreign alliance?
40851	Do gentlemen appeal to our fears, rather than to our understanding?
40851	Do gentlemen mean to decide at once thus precipitately against all indemnity whatever?
40851	Do gentlemen say opinions can be false which do not contain matter of fact?
40851	Do gentlemen themselves think that the persons, whom I see around me, ought to be trusted with such powers?
40851	Do not gentlemen know that our Government is in possession of testimony, demonstrating beyond all kind of doubt, that this is not the fact?
40851	Do not gentlemen know that peace or war is not in our power?
40851	Do not the people in this territory hold them as such?
40851	Do not we know that we may safely rely upon them?
40851	Do they imagine that any particular place can be assigned to which they can ensure a profound silence, and from which every person can be withheld?
40851	Do they mean to prevent the publication of their sentiments to their constituents and to the world?
40851	Do we not every day call upon particular officers to perform duties not previously assigned to, or required of them?
40851	Do we not hear of depredatory threats, and the mischiefs she has the power of doing us, urged as reasons why we should submit to her?
40851	Do we not know, said Mr. B., that he is among the persons proscribed by France?
40851	Do we not see the nation with whom we are at variance find quarrels with every country who is not strong enough to resist her?
40851	Do you not tremble when you look at it?
40851	Do you prefer peace to independence?
40851	Does any body expect any thing from the terrible generosity of the Great Nation?
40851	Does any gentleman on this floor know who confined him, or by order of what government?
40851	Does he mean to say that Congress did wrong in funding the public debt?
40851	Does he mean to say that the price of our liberty and independence ought not to have been paid?
40851	Does he remember when we passed this law?
40851	Does he wish unreasonable concessions to be made?
40851	Does it affect the case?
40851	Does it alter the fact?
40851	Does it embrace any point of fact on which a committee is to make inquiry?
40851	Does it follow, that a law is bad because all those who concurred in it can not give good reasons for their votes?
40851	Does it not rather appear as if they intended to alienate the affections of the people from their Government, in order to effect their own views?
40851	Does it not say that the agents must be under the Government of France?
40851	Does it result that we have a right to pass a law beforehand to contemplate such an event?
40851	Does not the President refer to them as important to enlighten us?
40851	Does not the power that cedes give up all right whatever to that which accepts?
40851	Does not the selection of the best objects to which to appropriate it devolve on you?
40851	Does not this look as though the United States are to patronize and support the establishment?
40851	Does not this manifest precipitation?
40851	Does not this show that the gentlemen themselves have not confided in the estimate of the artist?
40851	Does she not injure us on every side?
40851	Does such a commission empower one to exercise the functions of the whole in opposition to the opinions of his colleagues?
40851	Does the gentleman by this mean to give the lie to the Executive?
40851	Does the gentleman from Connecticut recollect the words of that decree?
40851	Does the gentleman say opinions can not be false?
40851	Does the gentleman wish to suppress the history of the political events of 1776?
40851	Does this mean, said he, that there are a majority of members in this House who must always be in the right, and a minority always in the wrong?
40851	Does this question involve an inquiry either into matter of expediency or of fact?
40851	Else why was the provision for exclusive jurisdiction made?
40851	Establish thus the dependence of the Judiciary Department, who will resort to them for protection against you?
40851	For by what rule of evidence could he discover and know what was really the writer''s belief?
40851	For fear of_ offending_ foreign nations we are not to ask or know what is our relative situation with such nations?
40851	For what do we ask?
40851	For what purpose was this great mass to be raised?
40851	For what purpose, said he, should they be finished, unless it were intended to man them?
40851	For what, sir, are elections held, if it be not that the people should change their representatives when they do not like them?
40851	For what?
40851	For when the powers and duties are taken away, what, let me ask, is left but a salary?
40851	From whence do they derive their authority?
40851	From whence, said Mr. V., is this reasoning drawn?
40851	From whom is a corrupt decision most to be feared?
40851	Gentlemen asked whether war is not approaching?
40851	Gentlemen catch at this; but what is it but an attempt to arrest the arm of the Government of this country, just when it was about to strike a blow?
40851	Gentlemen say, we are happier than though we were at war; are we at peace?
40851	Had Congress, then, a right to do any thing to bind the sovereignties of the independent States?
40851	Had any objection been made to the old Congress under the Confederation, that was federally organized, for the want of talents or integrity?
40851	Had not the citizens lived happily for a hundred years under the State Governments?
40851	Had she no navy in the American war, when with great gallantry, though with unequal success, she fought the English at sea?
40851	Had the public affairs been conducted with less ability than they are at present?
40851	Had they not an equal right to be heard with other petitioners?
40851	Has a great man reason to fear from a poor one?
40851	Has a nation a right to put these States in a dangerous situation?
40851	Has he any documents or proof to render the suspicion colorable?
40851	Has he heard of no commercial distresses, when violations so unprecedented have of late occurred?
40851	Has it been passed in a manner which wounded your pride, or aroused your resentment?
40851	Has it been the practice of this Government heretofore to break lances on the spot with any nation who injured or insulted her?
40851	Has the King of Spain, has the First Consul of France, no means of making such communication to the President of the United States?
40851	Have not the judges, in the same manner, been deprived of one of their offices?
40851	Have the French Government expressed any inclination to settle the differences subsisting between them and us?
40851	Have the Senate any authority to advise him as to the faithful execution of the laws?
40851	Have they not been wholly maritime?
40851	Have they not seen the letter of the Governor of New Orleans to the Governor of the Mississippi Territory?
40851	Have we a better prospect than that nation?
40851	Have we given our vote that we would not defend the free navigation of the Mississippi?
40851	Have we heretofore been considered as responsible?
40851	Have we not been ready to unite in adopting those measures which the infraction of treaties and our violated rights demand?
40851	Have we not heard this doctrine supported in the memorable case of the mandamus, lately before the Supreme Court?
40851	Have we not passed a variety of bills which gentlemen have declared amount to war?
40851	Have we not seen sedition laws?
40851	Have we not uniformly adhered to the principle that those who exercise power_ de facto_ are the only persons that we are bound to recognize?
40851	Have we not within these few days passed a law to prevent the importation of certain dangerous characters?
40851	Have we one common language, and are we united under one head?
40851	Have we such evidence as should incline us to rely upon it?
40851	Have you a judiciary system extending over this immense country, matured by the wisdom of your ablest and best men?
40851	Have you any thing to say in excuse or extenuation for said publication?
40851	Have you here the opportunities for valuable information which might be had elsewhere?
40851	Have you not done more?
40851	Have you not then established a new office by the destruction of the old one?
40851	Have you taxes which have been laid since the commencement of the Government?
40851	Have you, said Mr. L., no greater objects to engage your attention than whether this man or that man shall go out of your bar, or remain within it?
40851	He again asked, have we the means?
40851	He asked if our Government did not know that nothing was to be obtained here without money?
40851	He asked the decision of the question, whether, previously to offering his resolutions, the doors ought not to be closed?
40851	He asked those gentlemen whether the PRESIDENT had not a right to man the frigates, and if so, whether they should not be_ obliged_ to find the money?
40851	He asked whether any gentlemen in this House, who are so frequently called disorganizers, had ever broached a doctrine like this?
40851	He asked whether gentlemen did not believe the Executive had taken measures which would lead to war?
40851	He asked whether the United States might not as well lose revenue in the first instance, as put money into the people''s pockets to pay it with?
40851	He asked whether this was consonant to the principles of the constitution?
40851	He asked whether, where men wanted every thing, and were in proportion of 29 to 1, it was possible they could be trusted with power?
40851	He asked, what necessity for the exercise of power by Congress?
40851	He called upon gentlemen to say whether a temper of revolt was not more perceptible in that quarter?
40851	He himself saw it with concern; but where was the difference in crime between the French Republic and the Emperor?
40851	He should be glad to know where he saw the signature to know it?
40851	He then asked if this was not the very state in which we now were?
40851	He wished also to know whether it was intended that the Senate should declare that the publication was a breach of privilege?
40851	He wished he could see the breasts of gentlemen now glow with the patriotism which then animated them; but, instead of this, what do we see?
40851	He wished to know how a distinction was to be made on this subject?
40851	He wished to know what difficulty there would have been in defining the time here referred to in this bill?
40851	He wished to know what was meant?
40851	He wished to know whence he derived his information?
40851	He wished to know whether the House had not jurisdiction over this matter?
40851	He wished to know whether the people have not a right to say, if they choose, that the administration of justice is corrupt?
40851	He wished, therefore, to know what these unusual severities were which, upon our own ideas of Government, we could retaliate?
40851	He would appeal to the gentleman whether it was more honorable to desert his duty and fly a vote, than to act as he had done?
40851	He would ask the gentleman just up whether he knew any thing about the expense of a mausoleum?
40851	He would ask the gentleman whether that act of ours should have any influence on our situation with France?
40851	He would ask whether, in countries over which the Government had complete jurisdiction, worse things had not happened?
40851	He would ask, Was there any thing in the name of Government, if it operated in this manner?
40851	He would ask, could not an appropriation be made for the use of the Military Establishment in general terms?
40851	He would ask, how, under these circumstances, a jury could be struck in a federal court in that State agreeably to law?
40851	He would not deny that frauds were committed, but for this should the honest debtor be eternally fettered with his debts?
40851	He would wish to know what advantage there could be in giving this legislative agency to those States?
40851	Hence arises the advantages from public contributions; and would that House, he asked, refuse their assistance?
40851	Here Mr. C. was called to order by Mr. BINGHAM, of Pennsylvania, who inquired what the liberty of the press had to do on a question of postponement?
40851	How can the retrocession be made?
40851	How could any thing, then, be due to them?
40851	How could he know what part would awaken that idea of disrespect?
40851	How could it be fairly argued, because gentlemen desired to limit the duration of this law, that they were unwilling to defend their country?
40851	How could that little island( England) command such influence in foreign dominions?
40851	How could that share be estimated?
40851	How could the motion be necessary-- how be useful?
40851	How could they be collected?
40851	How could this be, when they had no right to be deprived of?
40851	How could this be?
40851	How could we say what our relation is, except we determine what is our relation with respect to the treaties subsisting between the two countries?
40851	How did the bankrupt law operate upon the planter?
40851	How did the gentleman mean to go, and how take peaceable possession?
40851	How did the matter stand?
40851	How does that honorable gentleman get his information?
40851	How does the gentleman from Virginia know what light this information may throw on the subject?
40851	How does the matter now stand?
40851	How is a naval force to guard us, which Great Britain can destroy, whenever she pleases, even in time of war?
40851	How is it to operate?
40851	How is that to be formed?
40851	How is the independence of the judge more affected by the one act than by the other?
40851	How is this question to be decided?
40851	How is this to be done?
40851	How long can we expect to maintain the other distinctive qualities of the magistracy of the two countries, when this sameness is established?
40851	How long is it since we have discovered the malignant qualities which are now ascribed to this law?
40851	How must they, then, get support?
40851	How progressing?
40851	How so?
40851	How then can this House meddle with that part of our property?
40851	How then can we commiserate with it as an unfortunate country?
40851	How then can we deliberate on this subject, unless we know the degree of probability there is, that it will be carried into effect?
40851	How then could it be expected that, at such a period, even the semblance of justice could be done to the subject?
40851	How then could the gentleman from Pennsylvania say that Holland has no navy?
40851	How was it terminated?
40851	How was this to be ascertained but by inquiry?
40851	How was this to be done?
40851	How was this to be done?
40851	How would this resolution then stand?
40851	How would you bear up, not only against the force of the enemy, but against the irresistible current of public opinion?
40851	How, he asked, would this operate?
40851	How, he would ask gentlemen, could this be granted, and yet retained?
40851	How, then, can the gentleman with truth say that we have deviated from the law of nations?
40851	How, then, could the respective States of Virginia and Maryland a moment longer possess the jurisdiction?
40851	How, then, he asked, could they make their observations on it as they had done?
40851	How, then, he asks, can we expect to protect our commerce by a navy?
40851	How, then, is the nomination of a Minister to be understood?
40851	How, then, was it possible to do without accredited agents to attend to our concerns in foreign countries?
40851	I ask gentlemen, what is there in the constitution to prove their signification to this end alone?
40851	I ask him how he would remedy this evil as he calls it?
40851	I ask you, Mr. Chairman, if any system could be devised more likely to produce vexation and delay?
40851	I ask, gentlemen, is it not unfriendly and wrongful?
40851	I ask, if you do not, by such treatment, put the Government entirely into their hands?
40851	I ask, was this a public treaty?
40851	I say, sir, these were her motives in agreeing to that measure; and did she not evince a magnanimous spirit by doing it?
40851	I wish to know if the establishment of this principle requires facts?
40851	If Congress can derive no solid benefit from the exercise of this power, why keep the people in this degraded situation?
40851	If Congress exercise exclusive legislation, does it not follow that no other body can exercise any legislation whatever?
40851	If Congress had not power to legislate on the African trade, then why did they say it was with a committee?
40851	If a man is to be subject to a prosecution for his opinions, what will be the consequence?
40851	If all these parties are agreed to revoke their act, I wish to know who is to dissent to it, or what obstacle can prevent its being rescinded?
40851	If an opinion upon a fact be expressed, and that opinion is false, scandalous, and malicious, ought it not to be subject to prosecution?
40851	If as a constitutional organ of the Government, where is the power given to the Senate?
40851	If from the cabinet, are we, the representatives of the people, to obtain it from him?
40851	If gentlemen are against finishing these frigates, why do they not come forward and declare it?
40851	If gentlemen were then wrong, is that a reason why they should continue to act wrong?
40851	If it was desirable, who could undertake it, who encourage it, like this House?
40851	If it were, why pass such a bill at this time, when it could not go into operation?
40851	If not, how could it be improper for us to seize the only moment which was left for the then majority to do what they deemed a necessary act?
40851	If not, what did all that had been said amount to?
40851	If nothing was intended but a mere incorporation, why not apply to the State that could incorporate such a body?
40851	If one person in particular has the sale of his debates to this House, will it not destroy the advantages any other can derive from it?
40851	If receded, what would be the situation of the Territory?
40851	If the House decide that the Government is bound to relieve in one case, are they not bound to afford relief in all similar cases?
40851	If the Intendant is to be controlled by the Minister, would he have taken a step so important without his advice?
40851	If the United States were to become underwriters to the whole Union, where must the line be drawn when their assistance might be claimed?
40851	If the debtor States were not to pay their balances, why settle the accounts?
40851	If the doors shall be closed, can not we still agree to the resolution?
40851	If the expense is to be provided for, how is it to be done?
40851	If the gentleman from Delaware, or other gentlemen thought so, why not combat a decision at the time?
40851	If the permission were once granted to one, would it not be necessary to extend it to all?
40851	If the sentiments were agreeable to the minds of the House, why waste our time to alter mere expressions while the sentiment is preserved?
40851	If the spirit which last session gave existence to sixteen new judges continued, who could say by what number they would be limited?
40851	If there was nothing improper, why should they fear to trust the Senate with it?
40851	If these expenses were to be incurred for five thousand men, what would be the expense of an Army of thirty thousand men?
40851	If these sentiments were true, why not express them?
40851	If they had not a right to permit it, whether they are not bound to prohibit it?
40851	If they had power, where was the impropriety of referring, at least that part which could be considered?
40851	If they have the right to punish libels, or false, or malicious attacks, why include them in this act?
40851	If they were to pay at this rate for overlooking the timber for one ship, what might they expect would be the expense of a navy yard?
40851	If they were, the only difference between us now is, what are the proper means to obtain this great end?
40851	If they will not say this, must they not allow that the constitution is positive in prohibiting any change in this respect?
40851	If they, then, were compelled to protect commerce, he asked if there was any other way of doing it than by a Navy?
40851	If this diversity of sentiment exists, ought not the evils under the judiciary law to be very great before we touch it?
40851	If this exercise were to be allowed in any case, why could it not be allowed in the present?
40851	If this is the case, and the House knew it, why not say so, and make preparations accordingly?
40851	If this reasoning is correct, can you repeal a law establishing an inferior court, under the constitution?
40851	If this were not the intention, why resist the amendment?
40851	If we agree to the resolution, do we not pledge ourselves to increase this force?
40851	If we are bound by the acts of the old Congress, are we not equally bound by those of the last session?
40851	If we thus give away the people''s money, said he, shall we not be charged with rapaciously putting our hands into their pockets?
40851	If you destroy all law and government, can the few oppress the many, or will the many oppress the few?
40851	If, said he, you incorporate men to build a University, are you not pledging yourselves to make up any deficiency?
40851	In a Republic, what species of knowledge can be equally important?
40851	In a court from which no one had an appeal and to whom it belonged to establish the leading principles of national jurisprudence?
40851	In a court, the judges of which are appointed by the PRESIDENT, by a jury selected by an officer holding his office at the will of the PRESIDENT?
40851	In making treaties he wished to know what was meant by two- thirds of the members of the Senate present?
40851	In short, does it appear that even Spain herself thought it an object of any importance?
40851	In what part of the constitution is it declared to be adopted?
40851	In what part of the constitution is such power delegated to this House?
40851	Indeed, can it, in the nature of things, be one of the rights of freemen to do injury?
40851	Instead of inducing them to behave better to us, had it not been with a knowledge of this that they have offered us fresh insult and indignity?
40851	Institutions for promoting it grow up, supported by the public purse; and to what object can it be dedicated with greater propriety?
40851	Is America, said he, arrived at this melancholy state?
40851	Is American character worth nothing, that we should thus, in my judgment, improperly, attempt to destroy it on this floor?
40851	Is a law that has received the varied assent required by the constitution, and is clothed with all the needful formalities, thereby invalidated?
40851	Is he a strict common lawyer, or a special pleader?
40851	Is he acquainted with chancery law?
40851	Is he bold enough to denounce this measure as one of the Federal victims marked for destruction?
40851	Is he prepared to say it will throw no light on this subject?
40851	Is it a license to injure others or the Government, by calumnies, with impunity?
40851	Is it a strange thing, I would ask gentlemen, for a State to grant charters?
40851	Is it at present for the public convenience?
40851	Is it because the Legislature may, at pleasure, set aside a treaty?
40851	Is it less expensive for individuals, or for the public, than it would be in some of your commercial cities?
40851	Is it necessary, when the whole nation is alive, to be moderate in the expression of our ideas?
40851	Is it not because popular opinion was called on to decide every thing, until those who wore bayonets decided for all the rest?
40851	Is it not before us?
40851	Is it not natural for the people to ask why Congress do not call for this information?
40851	Is it not rather a degraded state?
40851	Is it not reasonable, then, that an institution of this kind should be established in that place?
40851	Is it not time to gain information?
40851	Is it not well known that those debts were part of the price of our Revolution?
40851	Is it not your great duty to promote the public good; and can that be more completely promoted in any other way?
40851	Is it possible for any man to read the constitution with attention, and then suppose that such could have been its design?
40851	Is it possible that twelve thousand dollars can be necessary for the two Houses?
40851	Is it proper, Mr. N. asked, for legislators to be placed on this ground?
40851	Is it safe?
40851	Is it the design to tell us that its day has not yet come, but is approaching; and that the funding system is to add to the pile of Federal ruins?
40851	Is it the law of England, at any particular period, which is adopted?
40851	Is it then for this House to say they will not attend to the petitions of our citizens?
40851	Is it to be a river, or a line of marked trees?
40851	Is it too much to say of such a calculation, that it is a paltry calculation, unworthy of a statesman, and befitting only a schoolboy?
40851	Is murder prohibited, and may you shut a man up, and deprive him of sustenance, till he dies, and this not be denominated murder?
40851	Is no punishment to be inflicted on such a person?
40851	Is not this a strange situation?
40851	Is not this, said Mr. N., an acknowledgment of the effect which this law will have?
40851	Is our present situation calculated to produce this effect?
40851	Is such a thing possible?
40851	Is that a Government of laws which leaves us no security but in the confidence we have in the moderation and patriotism of one man?
40851	Is that a measure of general defence which has diminished confidence in the Government and produced disunion among the States and among the people?
40851	Is that formed by the constitution?
40851	Is that wonderful man who presides over the destinies of France, ignorant or unmindful of these forms?
40851	Is the creation of judicial officers the only thing committed to their discretion?
40851	Is the gentleman really in earnest in his inquiries at this time?
40851	Is the idea of a separation of these States so light and trifling an affair, as to be uttered with calmness in this deliberate assembly?
40851	Is the power claimed proper for Congress to possess?
40851	Is there a State in the Union which has not adopted it, and in which it is not in force?
40851	Is there an offensive sentence either to the Court of Spain or the Republic of France?
40851	Is there any condition annexed to the judge''s tenure of office, other than good behavior?
40851	Is there any doubt that we shall not stand in need of information when we come to discuss points connected with this subject?
40851	Is there no instance of a similar situation to be found in history?
40851	Is there not reason to believe gentlemen hope to conceal the full extent of their principles, by bringing them into operation only by degrees?
40851	Is there then nothing more?
40851	Is there, then, I ask you, any other mode for perpetuating the memory of such transcendent virtues so strong, so impressive as that which we propose?
40851	Is this House free from it?
40851	Is this a desirable state of things?
40851	Is this all our boasted acquisition, in return for the struggle we have made for our country?
40851	Is this an Address or an insult?
40851	Is this conciliation?
40851	Is this equitable?
40851	Is this fair, sir?
40851	Is this not calumny of the darkest hue?
40851	Is this not war?
40851	Is this system so very vicious, that it deserves nothing but abhorrence and destruction?
40851	Is this the case?
40851	Is this the language of irritation?
40851	Is this the mark of respect we ought to show to the first man in the nation?
40851	Is this the way in which six hundred thousand men are to be stigmatized?
40851	Is this to control succeeding rulers in their wild, their mad career?
40851	Is this wise?
40851	Is this, said he, a desirable state for the Legislature to be placed in?
40851	It is not want of respect that should prevent us, but are we provided to go into all the consequences attending a new negotiation?
40851	It is true, this place may be settled by foreigners; but can we suppose that any native citizen, who values his political rights, will come here?
40851	It may be said that you print your journals; but who reads them?
40851	It was a Judicial question, and the House ought not to pretend to determine the point; why, then, should they take up time upon it?
40851	Let me ask if this was not a vicious construction of a court of the highest authority and greatest importance in the nation?
40851	Let me ask, is there any thing in this calculated to gratify the courtly delicacy of a Castilian?
40851	Let me ask, sir, what could the judges do?
40851	Let me now ask, if the compensation allowed to these judges is extravagant?
40851	Let the gentleman from New York classify the claims as he pleases, can he tell the extent of the demands?
40851	Let the inquiry be made, of whom do the judges hold?
40851	May not equal oppression be imposed upon the people by giving your judges exorbitant salaries as by increasing their numbers?
40851	May not the same corrupt and unprincipled motive which would lead men to the raising of an army of judges lead them to squander the public money?
40851	May they not amount to five million or ten million of dollars?
40851	Might not sixty as well as sixteen, with salaries of twenty thousand, instead of two thousand dollars, be provided for in this way?
40851	Might there not be other applications?
40851	Mr. B. asked, would these gentlemen admit that Nash was guilty of the dreadful murders committed on board the British frigate?
40851	Mr. B. said, he would inquire whether the present salaries were a reasonable and just compensation for the services performed?
40851	Mr. B. wished to know to whom they are to be attached?
40851	Mr. BAYARD asked for information whether it was in order for him to state that he withdrew his resolution?
40851	Mr. BUCK asked if, when on the question on the resolution,( if, adopted,) a separate vote could be given?
40851	Mr. COIT wished to know whether it was necessary for the United States to intermeddle with this?
40851	Mr. DANA thought this a most extraordinary resolution indeed?
40851	Mr. DAWSON asked if these resolutions were not necessarily connected with a subject which the House had determined should be discussed in private?
40851	Mr. DAWSON inquired if the same rules that applied to the House, did not also apply to Committees of the Whole?
40851	Mr. GALLATIN asked whether he understood the SPEAKER rightly, that a motion for a reference to a committee superseded a motion for postponement?
40851	Mr. GALLATIN inquired from what document Mr. SMITH took his calculations?
40851	Mr. GORDON wished to know what part of the resolution the gentleman from Virginia was not ready to act upon?
40851	Mr. H. asked on which branch of this rule could the arguments of gentlemen be predicated?
40851	Mr. HARPER asked, if the report of the committee should not be agreed to, whether the resolution might not then be agreed to?
40851	Mr. HARPER had yesterday said that the impressments were few; but how were we to be certain of that?
40851	Mr. HARPER inquired of the SPEAKER whether that was the usual mode of proceeding?
40851	Mr. LIVINGSTON desired to know wherein he had attempted to ridicule the resources of this country?
40851	Mr. MURRAY inquired when the fire happened at Lexington?
40851	Mr. N. asked whether this bill did not go to the abridgment of the freedom of speech and of the press?
40851	Mr. N. asked whether we could ever hope to succeed in a plan of this kind?
40851	Mr. NICHOLAS asked whether it had heretofore been usual, in the case of a new House, to swear the members before the choice of a Speaker?
40851	Mr. NICHOLAS asked whether it was in order to abuse any class of citizens in this manner, and particularly since no motion was before the committee?
40851	Mr. NICHOLAS asked whether it would not then be in order to postpone the consideration of the subject?
40851	Mr. O. inquired if the House was ready to do the first?
40851	Mr. President, are we then to understand that opposition to the majority in the two Houses of Congress, is improper, is indecent?
40851	Mr. R. WILLIAMS wished to know whether the new census proposed to be taken was to affect the representation as well as the tax?
40851	Mr. R. said, if he had not, how was he to know whether it was good or bad?
40851	Mr. RANDOLPH said he would ask the gentleman from Delaware, whether he had seen any indisposition in that House to discuss the subject?
40851	Mr. S. SMITH asked if this were not the precise motion decided yesterday by the House?
40851	Mr. S. asked if this mode was not perfectly just and fair?
40851	Mr. SMILIE would ask whether the Supreme Court in such a case as this could be denominated an impartial tribunal?
40851	Mr. SPRIGGS said it had been inquired why the Legislature of Maryland could not have granted the commissioners what they now pray for?
40851	Mr. SWANWICK asked the gentleman what security there was in a peace with Algiers?
40851	Mr. SWANWICK considered the question to be to this effect: whether the debates be under the sanction of the House or not?
40851	Mr. W. LYMAN said, the question was, whether the House would incur the expense of$ 1,600 to supply the members with copies or not?
40851	Must it be acknowledged as the prerogative of that State to impose a Chief Magistrate on the Union?
40851	Must they hire a man for this purpose?
40851	Must we not judge of it by its intrinsic merit?
40851	Must you resort to Maryland for protection, and wait on her measures?
40851	No, said he, you have not: what is your answer?
40851	Now of what do courts consist?
40851	Now the question is whether, if the offices are abolished, those who filled them before they were abolished are entitled to salaries?
40851	Now what has the information desired by gentlemen to do with any such negotiation?
40851	Now when there were no services to be performed, what salary could there be allowed, or what retribution demanded?
40851	Now, sir, is it not our duty to consult our country''s interest, before we take this rash step, which we can not recall?
40851	Now, suppose in the French Treaty there were the same provisions as in the British Treaty, would this have produced payment?
40851	Now, what could possibly be in possession of that Department?
40851	Of any resignations of the office of judge of the circuit court, in order"that a salutary system might take effect?"
40851	Of what nature should these be?
40851	Of what use, Mr. G. asked, had been the reference of a set of resolutions made some days ago by Mr. SITGREAVES?
40851	Of whom shall your judges be independent?
40851	On the other hand, what do you see?
40851	On the passage of the law of last session, did we hear any protest against its unconstitutionality from the Supreme or district courts?
40851	On the question whether the Senate would advise and consent to the ratification of the third article of the convention?
40851	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
40851	On the question, Shall this bill pass?
40851	On the question, whether the Senate would advise and consent to the ratification of the third article?
40851	On the question, whether the Senate would advise and consent to the said additional article, as amended?
40851	On the question,"Will the Senate advise and consent to the adoption of this article?"
40851	Once take that step, and what obligation was there in Congress to remain here?
40851	Or could they say that no part of the 80,000 militia, ordered to be held in readiness, would not be called into service?
40851	Or does he believe that these events will be handed down in association with the bloody buoy, and Porcupine''s works?
40851	Or had the PRESIDENT set a bad example, by living in a style of extravagance and splendor?
40851	Or has he had time to examine whether that decree is really in force, or not?
40851	Or has not the invariable course been to seek reparation in the first place by negotiation?
40851	Or have we found angels in the form of kings to govern him?
40851	Or is it abridged by a law to restrain lying?
40851	Or is the judgment of this House so feeble, that it may not be trusted?
40851	Or was he the very leader of the band that broke down these constitutional ramparts?
40851	Or was the power placed in them to be exercised like other duties, according to justice and propriety?
40851	Or was there a difference of right, because Virginia, with its extent and population, could make more clamor than any other State?
40851	Or would it be proper to sit down, satisfied that our enemy will not invade us, though they see we are not prepared to meet them?
40851	Or would they be ready to forfeit the revenue arising from it?
40851	Or would you be bound to retain them, lest it should infringe a private right?
40851	Or, if they could, can they find time to hear and decide causes?
40851	Or, that there were in that case no measures adopted?
40851	Or, will gentlemen say it was their intention to place themselves in this situation?
40851	Ought it to be rejected on the ground of jurisdiction?
40851	Ought not the House to be possessed of all the important information in the power of the Executive to give?
40851	Ought not this person to perform the object, although the particular mode of using the means has not been prescribed?
40851	Ought our country to remain in such cases dependent on foreign supply, precarious, because liable to be interrupted?
40851	Ought they not, then, he asked, to devise some species of tax by which to draw some part of the revenue from the inhabitants of the back country?
40851	Ought they, then, to support the doctrine which hereafter may be practised on to the full extent?
40851	Ought we not to aim at harmonizing, instead of dividing our citizens?
40851	Ought we not, therefore, on such a subject, to take immediate means to gain information?
40851	Our trade became so insecure, that it was necessary to do-- what?
40851	Patriotism could not be purchased, and should they despair of getting a man to fill the office of PRESIDENT without they increased the salary?
40851	Perhaps he has formed from his own mind a proper selection for our children, and is against the press handing down any thing else?
40851	Perhaps he might be asked, if we were, then, to be left without protection?
40851	Put the case to its consequences, and what becomes of the check?
40851	Questions arise whether both descriptions of sufferers ought not to be provided for?
40851	Returning to the question of foreign political intercourse: Was it proper to bring it back to what it was eighteen months ago?
40851	Shall he, and he only, have the public ear?
40851	Shall it be confided to men immediately responsible to the people, or to those who are irresponsible?
40851	Shall oppressed humanity find no asylum on this globe?
40851	Shall the Speaker have the discretion of saying what debates shall be taken and what shall not?
40851	Shall then a mistaken spirit of economy, and a still more mistaken jealousy arrest us?
40851	Shall they obey God or Mammon?
40851	Shall we abandon our duty?
40851	Shall we repress truth?
40851	Shall we sacrifice the interests of our constituents to a sense of politeness to these gentlemen?
40851	Shall we send a Minister hampered by such a resolution?
40851	Shall we shut the door against individual benevolence?
40851	Shall we sit down contented under the imputation of lukewarmness in this cause?
40851	Shall we thereby invite her aggressions?
40851	Shall we, said Mr. D., because our seamen have been first injured by Great Britain, when France uses them still worse, abandon them?
40851	Shall we, said he, treat the citizens of Savannah with more disrespect than the people of St. Domingo?
40851	Should I be doing right, said Mr. G., to say that I believe that this section of the bill is an effect of that negotiation?
40851	Should he, from unavoidable accidents, be cast into prison, and his family reduced to misery and distress?
40851	Should we now say they should be at our direction, and that we would not grant money without?
40851	Since our treaties were always made by special Envoys, what advantage could it be to have numerous Ministers Plenipotentiary in Europe?
40851	Sir, after a declaration of this kind, can you retract?
40851	Sir, said Mr. R., whom does this infraction of the treaty and the natural rights of this country most intimately affect?
40851	So we are told!--But if there be blame, on whom does it fall?
40851	Still, if the gentlemen would not agree with him as to the unconstitutionality of the measure proposed, he would ask, was it expedient?
40851	Suppose Georgia had a title to this territory, had not the United States the power of depriving Georgia of it?
40851	Suppose a libel were written against the PRESIDENT, where is it most probable that such an offence would receive an impartial trial?
40851	Suppose a majority of_ one_ was obtained on the report, what end would be produced?
40851	Suppose such an alliance was formed, would it not be said that Congress are bound to carry it into effect?
40851	Suppose the PRESIDENT should, after this, appoint officers to enlist men for the frigates, how could the House refuse to pay them?
40851	Suppose the persons deny your power-- how are your committee to enforce their mandates?
40851	Suppose these taxes are removed, are not the products of the country increasing?
40851	Suppose this power is doubted?
40851	Suppose we go into a Committee of the Whole, what light can we expect from their deliberation?
40851	Suppose we pass a law which calls upon the PRESIDENT to act, what ought the PRESIDENT to do?
40851	Suppose you had no law at all, could the rich oppress the poor?
40851	Suppose your courts of law claim cognizance as a case of libel, are you to have two prosecutions and two trials for the same offence?
40851	Suppose your reliance had been altogether on this broken staff, and not on the elective principle?
40851	Suppose, as the gentlemen wish, we say we will indemnify, does that pay the claims?
40851	Suppose, said Mr. H., we were to give thirty thousand dollars towards this loss, what would it be when divided among the whole Union?
40851	Suppose, said he, persons should claim to be Electors, who had never been_ properly_ appointed, should their vote be received?
40851	Surely it would not; and is it not the duty of every good citizen to heal, as far as possible, the wounds of society?
40851	That he would be punishable for concealing a treason who could not be punished for plotting it?
40851	That the moment they throw off the French yoke, they will receive all the assistance from this country which a free commerce can give them?
40851	The CHAIRMAN asked what Message?
40851	The SPEAKER asked, whether it was the pleasure of the House that the Sergeant- at- arms should be sent for Mr. LYON?
40851	The SPEAKER said the question was, whether it should be committed or not?
40851	The SPEAKER said, then you do accordingly agree to this proposition?
40851	The United States intend to exercise jurisdiction over that Territory, and was there any more reason for excepting this jurisdiction than any other?
40851	The bill having been determined to be read a third time, the usual question was put by the SPEAKER,"For what day shall it be made the order?"
40851	The charge is easily made, but has the gentleman the means of supporting it?
40851	The fires at New York, Baltimore, and Charleston, had been mentioned; but what were the means of Savannah when compared with New York?
40851	The first inquiry was, whether the law of nations permitted the merchant vessels of neutral nations to arm?
40851	The first question was, then, whether that Administration had been marked with wisdom, firmness, and patriotism?
40851	The first thing he should ask was, Is such a thing desirable?
40851	The following question was then put,"Shall this bill pass?"
40851	The gentleman from Connecticut had said, why send a Minister Plenipotentiary to London or Paris, any more than the other Courts?
40851	The gentleman from Georgia had objected to the reference because the petition contained a system of facts which_ he said_ was not true?
40851	The gentleman from New York has asked, triumphantly asked, what power exists in our courts to deliver up an individual to a foreign Government?
40851	The law for authorizing the building of the three frigates?
40851	The only question is, How it shall be performed?
40851	The only question is, whether it will promote the taking of French privateers?
40851	The only question, said he, is, if your property is unjustly attacked, will you defend it?
40851	The previous question was then put in this form:"Shall the main question( viz: the resolution for reprimanding the offending members) now be put?"
40851	The previous question was then put,"Shall the main question be now put?"
40851	The question arises, by what tenure?
40851	The question before the House was not, Will we resent it?
40851	The question being,"Shall this bill pass?"
40851	The question is, what power is thus to be limited and checked?
40851	The question was put,"Is the decision of the Chair right?"
40851	The question was then put, shall the bill pass?
40851	The question was, whether the papers before them afforded reason to believe that legal evidence of the title did exist?
40851	The question was, whether they were to go over the same ground every four or eight years of furnishing the house of a new PRESIDENT?
40851	The second is, if further provisions are necessary, must they be made by amendment to the constitution?
40851	The simple question was, which of the two grounds the House would take?
40851	The true question is, were there courts enough under the old system, to do the business of the nation?
40851	The truth of these despatches admitted, what was your Government to do?
40851	The words are general,"all treasons, felonies,& c."Why are they confined in construction to British subjects?
40851	The yeas and nays were taken on the question,"Shall this bill be postponed till the first Monday in December next?"
40851	Then gentlemen get up and ask what we are to do with three frigates?
40851	Then why postpone it?
40851	Then, how could any gentleman say this was a trifling question, and one with which the House had nothing at all to do?
40851	These are my objects; do they not entitle us to the information asked?
40851	They certainly will not; for who would consent to sit here, or of what use would it be, under such conditions?
40851	They could appoint Commissioners to settle the accounts, but could they impose the debts upon the States?
40851	They might do, sir, for a tribe of starving Indians; but is this the rank that we are to hold among the nations of the world?
40851	This being established, the inquiry was, to what department was the power in question allotted?
40851	This being the case, he asked gentlemen which they would choose?
40851	This is, Shall the amendment be received or not?
40851	This was novel, and what result did it lead to?
40851	To calm those irritations which disturb its repose?
40851	To deprive them of the common right of participating in the passage of laws which all the citizens enjoyed?
40851	To remove all things which may alarm, torment, or exacerbate?
40851	To take a fair view of the resolutions, what did they amount to?
40851	To the Judiciary: What is the language applied to them?
40851	To what point, therefore, could these discussions lead?
40851	To what source, then, shall we resort for a knowledge of what constitutes this thing, called misbehavior in office?
40851	To what will not this dangerous doctrine lead?
40851	To whom are these appearances to be made?
40851	To whom are these services to be rendered?
40851	To whom were they pledged, and for what?
40851	Under all these grievances, what, said he, are we called upon to do?
40851	Under these circumstances, Mr. S. wished to know why their petitions should not be taken into consideration?
40851	Upon this subject, so very important, are they to be kept in the dark?
40851	Upon what ground could he found such charges?
40851	Upon what ground does the member from Vermont stand?
40851	Wanting wisdom and morals, how would they use it?
40851	Was a loan of money accomplished?
40851	Was any gentleman in the House bound to be satisfied, with the gentleman from New York, that all the facts necessary to be known were furnished?
40851	Was any gentleman prepared to say how many would be made?
40851	Was contempt the way to recommend attachment to the Government?
40851	Was every gentleman in the House bound to confine himself solely to the resolutions before the House?
40851	Was he forgetful of his duty?
40851	Was he to determine the point whether France has authorized hostilities against the United States?
40851	Was he to send forward to the seat of Government to be instructed what to do?
40851	Was he to stand still without making any attempt to avert the danger?
40851	Was it a circumstance which must ever be remembered with mortification, and which therefore will never be forgiven?
40851	Was it a desirable object to do away a great evil?
40851	Was it adopted by the courts?
40851	Was it announced to the President of the United States, in the usual forms of civility between nations who duly respect each other?
40851	Was it by the constitution?
40851	Was it conceivable that to her the place could be of any importance?
40851	Was it criminal to say that the Executive is supported by a party?
40851	Was it erroneous or criminal to say that debts and taxes were the ruinous consequences of war?
40851	Was it in his power to repel and punish the indignity put upon the nation?
40851	Was it intended by this resolution to charge the committee with inquiring into a breach of privilege as it respected the majority of this body?
40851	Was it not an order to bring France to terms by distressing her islands?
40851	Was it not as well to decide on this resolution in this committee as in any other committee?
40851	Was it not clear to every one that the country was going fast into a state of war, and( in the words of Mr. SITGREAVES) was it not to be expected?
40851	Was it not probable then, he would ask, that the PRESIDENT would proceed to complete those frigates, according to the power given him?
40851	Was it not to be supposed that contracts were entered into for that purpose?
40851	Was it not true?
40851	Was it not, therefore, prudent to keep a watchful eye in this respect?
40851	Was it possible, he asked, for a Government to exist, when this confidence was refused to one of its branches?
40851	Was it proper for this country, he asked, to turn its attention towards marine strength?
40851	Was it that the members of Congress were assembled on the banks of the Potomac, with Virginia in view on the other side?
40851	Was it the opinion of those gentlemen that the record was to be found in the charge of murder against that illustrious character?
40851	Was it the sense of that House?
40851	Was it warranted by any act of Congress, or by the practice of the State?
40851	Was it when three- fourths or four- fifths of a town was destroyed, or what other proportion?
40851	Was it, that one of the candidates was a Virginian?
40851	Was not every advance, on our part, for an adjustment of differences, met with new injuries and new insults?
40851	Was not such an opinion of things, he asked, calculated to induce France to believe that she might make her own terms with us?
40851	Was not this, he said, encouragement to put a period to that man''s existence?
40851	Was not, then, this spot become the permanent seat of the Government of the Union?
40851	Was official notice of it given to the Government of this country?
40851	Was that opinion then correct, and now false, in the estimation of gentlemen?
40851	Was the President of the United States the clerk of the court, to keep the records of it?
40851	Was the argument not in point; or was it the declaration of his own opinion, as he went along, that was out of order?
40851	Was the gentleman serious when he made this remark?
40851	Was the gentleman, sir, acquainted with the fact when he made this statement?
40851	Was the intention of the committee to have reference to the taking of free negroes and selling them as slaves, or the taking slaves to make them free?
40851	Was the memory of that great man to be perpetuated by a heap of large inanimate objects?
40851	Was then, he asked, a question of war a card of politeness?
40851	Was there any reason since to alter our opinion?
40851	Was there any thing in these men, he asked, that should prevent every kind of assistance being bestowed on them?
40851	Was there not cause for anxiety, when a nation, contending for the right of self- government, was thus attacked?
40851	Was there nothing, Mr. R. asked, to admonish us to take a measure of this kind?
40851	Was there nothing, he asked, which called for a declaration of the kind proposed?
40851	Was this decent or indecent?
40851	Was this defensive?
40851	Was this indecent in them?
40851	Was this indecent?
40851	Was this, he asked, the state of society?
40851	We are asked by the gentleman from Virginia if the people want judges to protect them?
40851	We are asked, why relinquish these balances before we are solicited by the States?
40851	We are averse to take up the motion of the gentleman from Connecticut, and wherefore?
40851	We asked if cards of hospitality were in the mean time necessary?
40851	We asked what had led to our present conversation?
40851	We have been asked, if we are afraid of having an army of judges?
40851	We may tell him of his wisdom and his firmness, but what of all that unless we connect it with his Administration?
40851	Were his nerves unstrung?
40851	Were not gentlemen any longer to express their difference of opinion?
40851	Were not the Detroit, and several other forts within our territory, held ten or a dozen years by Great Britain, in direct violation of a treaty?
40851	Were not the different departments, Executive, Legislative, and Judicial, assembled, according to the constitution, in this District?
40851	Were there none of these judges ready to plunge their swords in the American heart?
40851	Were there not great doubts existing throughout the United States?
40851	Were they asleep on their post?
40851	Were they not, then, to be called upon for money to man the frigates?
40851	Were they so at present?
40851	Were they then to act as if the law had been repealed?
40851	Were they to go to war to avenge this partition?
40851	Were troops ever raised in a different manner?
40851	Were we to give up our commerce?
40851	Were we to suppose that the President had already taken measures to_ revenge_ the injuries of the United States?
40851	What advantage, he asked, was derived to this country from giving aliens eligibility to office?
40851	What an affecting spectacle had we the other day of sixty of these unfortunate men returning from Algerine slavery?
40851	What an influence can she command over our commerce?
40851	What are the reasons urged by the gentlemen to induce a different proceeding, an immediate appeal to arms?
40851	What are their duties?
40851	What are they given for?
40851	What are we to understand by this remark of the gentleman?
40851	What are we to understand by this right, given by God and nature?
40851	What avail our toasts-- our boasted recollections of him, and regret at his fate-- if we take not every opportunity to alleviate that distress?
40851	What but this compact-- what but this specific part of it, can save us from ruin?
40851	What circle would gentlemen fix the committee in to amend this Address, if they are not to give scope to these sentiments?
40851	What connection had we with the French Government?
40851	What could be more easy?
40851	What could have been the reason why Congress was to assume this exclusive legislation?
40851	What did the gentleman mean by avoiding the general principle?
40851	What disguise?
40851	What do gentlemen understand by"the freedom of speech and of the press?"
40851	What do the gentlemen tell us?
40851	What do we know respecting the cession?
40851	What does all this mean, sir?
40851	What does the constitution say?
40851	What does the resolution call for?
40851	What effect could a discussion have, but to show the world that there were_ parties_ in the House, and to raise a rancorous disposition?
40851	What fact?
40851	What had the President to do with the proceedings of that court?
40851	What had the States to dread?
40851	What has been our progress since the year 1763, in settling our Western country?
40851	What has the fact been?
40851	What have we to fear, suppose we interfere with that sensibility?
40851	What is his character as a lawyer?
40851	What is his offer to our Government?
40851	What is it that has drained the wealth of Europe itself into the coffers of two or three of its principal commercial powers, but a marine?
40851	What is it, that has drawn to Europe the superfluous riches of the three other quarters of the globe, but a marine?
40851	What is its nature?
40851	What is its purport?
40851	What is liberty of conscience?
40851	What is that crime?
40851	What is the abstract question?
40851	What is the ancient system?
40851	What is the consequence of one sovereign transferring all jurisdiction to another sovereign?
40851	What is the consequence?
40851	What is the fact?
40851	What is the implication of this doctrine?
40851	What is the inevitable deduction to be drawn from this fact?
40851	What is the inference?
40851	What is the internal and external state of this country?
40851	What is the object of the gentleman from Delaware?
40851	What is the practice?
40851	What is the present system?
40851	What is the probable result?
40851	What is the situation of the powers that remain?
40851	What is the state of things?
40851	What is the true and undisguised state of facts?
40851	What is there here that implicates the character of Spain?
40851	What is there then exhibited from the earliest period of our history?
40851	What is this encouragement?
40851	What is this population?
40851	What manifestation was there of the public will relative to the late election of a President of the United States?
40851	What may we then expect?
40851	What might be the consequence?
40851	What more does the gentleman wish?
40851	What more, then, can you do, than decide the principle which shall be applied to them?
40851	What objections could there be to this?
40851	What ought the government to have done?
40851	What power does a court possess to seize any individual and determine that he shall be adjudged by a foreign tribunal?
40851	What provision have they made to fulfil that intention?
40851	What right had they to exclusive seats?
40851	What saving, then, does he mean to make by opposing the establishment of this office?
40851	What should be thought of this, as taken in connection with the fate of the act and pendency of the Presidential election?
40851	What temper accompanied the progress of the bill in the other House I know not, or, if I did know, would it be proper for me here to say?
40851	What then was the difference of right between them?
40851	What then was to be done with them?
40851	What then, I ask, is the amount of this savage conduct?
40851	What then?
40851	What use can it be to take a step from which no benefit can be derived?
40851	What was meant here?
40851	What was more easy than for letters and instructions to be sent by post?
40851	What was the General to do?
40851	What was the consequence of this spirited conduct?
40851	What was the effect of this provision in the constitution?
40851	What was the engine now brought out against this freedom-- an engine possessed of all the powers necessary to ensure its success?
40851	What was the fact at Philadelphia?
40851	What was the fact?
40851	What was the language of the amendment?
40851	What was the language of the present appropriation?
40851	What was the object of the bill?
40851	What was the objection to this mode of proceeding?
40851	What was then the conduct of the French Government?
40851	What was to be done?
40851	What was to be the course of their proceeding?
40851	What were the arguments in favor of the warm tone?
40851	What were the committee to do?
40851	What were the consequences of our late negotiation?
40851	What were the embarrassments likely to arise therein?
40851	What were the people of the United States, and abroad, to think of this?
40851	What were they about to ask?
40851	What were we to substitute as complimentary to him in its place?
40851	What will be the effect if we have it told at our wharves that we object to man them, because we have peace with Algiers?
40851	What will be the effect of the desired repeal?
40851	What will be the effect on the Southern States?
40851	What will be the good of this?
40851	What will hinder them from arriving in the Floridas, and what can guard the approach from thence to our Southern frontier?
40851	What will you say to this?
40851	What would be the effect of this law on the inhabitants of the Territory?
40851	What would be the language, what would be the feelings of gentlemen in this House, were such an indignity offered on the Atlantic coast?
40851	What would become, in such a state of things, of the national debt, and all the banks in the United States?
40851	What would gentlemen have had the Government to do?
40851	What would they say if the Chesapeake, the Delaware, or the Bay of New York were shut up, and all egress prohibited by a foreign power?
40851	What, Mr. S. asked, would be the consequence of refusing this appropriation?
40851	What, asked Mr. P., was the ground taken at the last session, and acted upon at this?
40851	What, he asked, could be obtained by a vote on this subject?
40851	What, he asked, is the situation of the West Indies?
40851	What, he asked, was intended to be done with these armed vessels?
40851	What, he asked, was the letter which the gentleman read from his book?
40851	What, he asked, were to be the instructions given to the commanders of these vessels?
40851	What, he asked, would the world think of such a versatility of conduct?
40851	What, indeed, could such committee report?
40851	What, said Mr. B., is this present?
40851	What, said Mr. C., is the nature of the injuries which we have received from France?
40851	What, said Mr. G., are the inconveniences which would arise from a measure of this kind?
40851	What, said Mr. G., would be the degree of proof necessary to carry into effect this law?
40851	What, said Mr. R., would be the conduct of France, if in our situation?
40851	What, said Mr. S., is to be feared from the residence of aliens amongst us?
40851	What, said he, have they said to our Minister-- or rather to the person who was formerly our Minister, but who then had no power?
40851	What, said he, is most prudent to do?
40851	What, said he, is our external situation?
40851	What, said he, is the nature of the crime now proposed to be punished by the expulsion of the member from Vermont?
40851	What, said he, is the situation of the North- western Territory at this time?
40851	What, said he, is the situation of those countries which have gone into the establishment of large navies?
40851	What, said he, is to prevent Victor Hugues sending over two or three frigates?
40851	What, sir, has been done?
40851	What, sir, was the policy of America, from the commencement of the Revolution?
40851	What, then, Mr. Chairman, is the instruction which we may draw from this example?
40851	What, then, is substantially the nature of this appellate jurisdiction?
40851	What, then, is the nature of the amendment?
40851	What, then, is the rational, the honest, the constitutional idea of freedom of language or of conduct?
40851	What, then, is their aim?
40851	What, then, said Mr. D., are our hopes relative to France?
40851	When did the right of the President to recommend modifications of the Judiciary system cease?
40851	When gentlemen ask, What is the question?
40851	When it goes up to the Senate, may they not say they will not vote to finish, except it be to man them?
40851	When that very power from which we had detached ourselves, refused to carry her treaty into execution, did we then go to war?
40851	When the Indians were upon them, what could the Governor do?
40851	When the subject is sent to the committee with that instruction, can it be conceived that committee is forced to report a bill?
40851	When the term approached, the inquiry was, what judge are we to have?
40851	When was this jurisdiction to commence but at the period when the General Government should occupy it?
40851	When we reflect on a Treaty entered into on this principle with Great Britain, should France complain?
40851	When, too, the opinions of other gentlemen on fundamental points coincided with your own?
40851	When?
40851	Whence did he collect this information?
40851	Whence is it that the United States may abrogate the treaties with France?
40851	Whence now this change of spirit?
40851	Whence, then, the necessity of such appointment?
40851	Whenever we supposed the constitution violated, did we talk of civil war?
40851	Where could they be carried?
40851	Where is Italy, Switzerland, Flanders, and all Germany west of the Rhine?
40851	Where is the liberty of the press, which is secured to the citizens of the Union against Federal usurpation?
40851	Where is the man, exclaimed he, who will not defend his country and his fellow- citizens against such a decree?
40851	Where is the nation that will respect another that is passive under such humiliating degradation and disgrace?
40851	Where is the nation, ancient or modern, that has borne such treatment without resentment of resistance?
40851	Where was Hercules, that he did not crush this den of robbers that broke into the sanctuary of the constitution?
40851	Where was the gentleman from New York, who has, on this debate, made such a noble stand in favor of a violated constitution?
40851	Where was the_ Ajax Telamon_ of his party, or, to use his own more correct expression, the_ faction_ to which he belonged?
40851	Where was their security if the acts of these Representatives of the people could be to- morrow revoked by a power deriving authority from elsewhere?
40851	Where were these guardians of the constitution-- these vigilant sentinels of our rights and liberties, when this law passed?
40851	Where will you find men of nerve that will risk certain ruin?
40851	Where, he asked, is the difference between depending upon the French or British nation?
40851	Where, said he, are your sailors?
40851	Wherein have we differed from the compact made with France by our treaty made with that country?
40851	Whether he is in any way connected with the British Government, or not?
40851	Whether his ideas go to independence or not?
40851	Whether it is consistent with the nature of our Government, that a single branch, without check or control, should become judges in their own case?
40851	Whether so much as provides that the second article shall be expunged, shall stand?
40851	Whether so much as provides that the third article be expunged, shall stand?
40851	Whether that part shall stand which provides a limitation of time to its duration?
40851	Whether that part shall stand which restrains it from operating against former treaties?
40851	Whether the abilities of Government would be competent to meet all possible claims of this nature?
40851	Whether the constitution had not delegated the power of making treaties to other branches of the Government?
40851	Whether they would suffer themselves to come under the power of the French nation, or repel force by force?
40851	Which situation is it most for the interest of the United States that they should be in?
40851	Who are its enemies?
40851	Who are to decide between the constitution and the acts of Congress?
40851	Who are to judge?
40851	Who are to pronounce on the laws?
40851	Who can prevent that?
40851	Who can say that Mr. Gerry has power to treat alone, or that the French Government is willing to treat with him on fair and honorable terms?
40851	Who can show me in what other manner the same good can be effected by so small a sum?
40851	Who gave them the power to vest in any other authority than in Congress the right of declaring war?
40851	Who is so ignorant as not to know, that the imposition of a tax would create a hundred enemies for one friend?
40851	Who is to judge of the necessity or utility of these services?
40851	Who knows but the power in whose custody he is may expect America to interest herself in his favor?
40851	Who said this?
40851	Who shall fix the boundaries of these new empires, when the fatal separation shall take place?
40851	Who was it, that, in England, destroyed the Representative Government, and concentrated all its powers in his own hands?
40851	Who will confide in, who will be bound by their decrees?
40851	Who will declare whether they be unconstitutional?
40851	Who will venture on it; because, where will you draw the line?
40851	Who would withhold a few dollars from his purse to facilitate it?
40851	Who, said he, is the man who has this proof?
40851	Who, sir, I would ask the gentleman, are my coadjutors?
40851	Who, sir, proved fatal to the liberties of Rome?
40851	Who, then, are, in reality, the advocates of a limited authority, and who are the champions of a dangerous and uncontrollable power?
40851	Why are we told of the inconsistency of our means?
40851	Why can not they obtain this power which is asked of us of the State where it is wanted?
40851	Why combine it with considerations connected with negotiation?
40851	Why did they commit spoliations upon our commerce long before the British Treaty was ever dreamt of?
40851	Why do gentlemen tell the House of the danger of irritating France?
40851	Why do not gentlemen give away that which they have some authority or right to bestow?
40851	Why do not these"express acts of Parliament"change the law as to others than"British subjects?"
40851	Why do we hear of such things on this floor?
40851	Why do we want information, but that we may have a more clear view of the general subject?
40851	Why does the PRESIDENT communicate these things to us, if we are not allowed to express any sentiments about them?
40851	Why give one a privilege more than another?
40851	Why has he first learnt this offensive act from those who suffer by it?
40851	Why has this document been so sedulously kept from the public eye?
40851	Why insinuate that the Government had been wrong?
40851	Why is he thus held up to contempt and derision?
40851	Why is it now deemed requisite to abrogate the treaties by which this country has been connected with France?
40851	Why is it refused to the Federal Constitution?
40851	Why is the gentleman from Pennsylvania so very anxious on the subject?
40851	Why is this practice, hitherto unopposed, now to be broken in upon?
40851	Why lock him up there?
40851	Why not decide its other proportions?
40851	Why not furnish the American people at once with the real and the whole project of himself and his friends?
40851	Why not seize then what is so essential to us as a nation?
40851	Why not then restore the people to their former condition?
40851	Why object then, in a case where there was a difference of opinion, to refer the decision to an impartial tribunal?
40851	Why pass acts fitted for a state of war, without declaring that that is the state of the country?
40851	Why postpone it?
40851	Why prevent his being able to support his family?
40851	Why send him to jail?
40851	Why should a heavy fine and imprisonment be made the penalty for carrying on a trade so advantageous?
40851	Why should it not be sent there, and a profitable return be made?
40851	Why should the House trouble itself to sanction any particular work?
40851	Why should the individual members of either branch, or either branch itself, have more privileges than him?
40851	Why silent on the Legislature?
40851	Why such declamation?
40851	Why take it to a select committee?
40851	Why then divide it into little detached parts?
40851	Why then do gentlemen, who on those occasions approved of these measures, now despair of negotiation?
40851	Why then go into a committee?
40851	Why then put off the decision of a claim in his opinion just, and to which the House ought not to shut their ears?
40851	Why this provision?
40851	Why was that State to be selected out from all others?
40851	Why was the boundary of the United States always fixed at 31?
40851	Why were they silent till within a few weeks before the election of our President?
40851	Why, asked Mr. N., was this law originally passed?
40851	Why, he asked, did foreigners seek a residence in this country?
40851	Why, is there any crime in printing a minute of our transactions?
40851	Why, said he, shall we, who are a Confederacy of the Democratic Republicans, everlastingly keep our eyes upon the pageantry of Eastern Courts?
40851	Why, then, ask for it?
40851	Why, then, do gentlemen complain?
40851	Why, then, endeavor to stir up the feelings of the public against it by alleging it to be just cause of complaint?
40851	Why, then, mask his proposition?
40851	Why, then, refer this resolution calling for information to a committee?
40851	Why, then, rise for the purpose of referring it to a secret committee?
40851	Why, then, shall we proceed to measures which must inevitably involve the country in war?
40851	Why, then, should we hazard the being involved in European broils?
40851	Why?
40851	Why?
40851	Why?
40851	Will any gentleman say it is for our personal convenience that the seat of Government is now at this place?
40851	Will any man undertake to say, that the privilege of the Parliament of Great Britain ought to be that of the Congress of this country?
40851	Will any one say that a man who does not keep the laws ought to be allowed to make them?
40851	Will gentlemen look back to the histories of other countries, and then tell us the people here have nothing to apprehend from themselves?
40851	Will gentlemen say it is to be found in the force of this wise precedent?
40851	Will gentlemen say that the same liberty of writing and speaking did not exist then that now exists?
40851	Will gentlemen say they will pay all demands before they know any thing of their nature or amount?
40851	Will gentlemen sit here and shut their eyes to the state and condition of their country?
40851	Will he deny that this was a measure to which we had been urged for years by our adversaries, because they foresaw in it the ruin of Federal power?
40851	Will he say that premises and conclusions are the same thing?
40851	Will it be contended that such great trusts ought to be reposed in feeble or incapable hands?
40851	Will it be expected, that I should quote Sidney, De Lolme, Montesquieu, and a host of elementary writers, to prove this assertion?
40851	Will it be made a question whether it is proper to ask for information?
40851	Will it be said that there is a security to the freedom of mankind from the moderation with which this enormous power is to be exercised?
40851	Will it be said, that although you can not remove the judge from office, yet you can remove his office from him?
40851	Will it not be a declaration to the remaining judges that they hold their offices subject to your will and pleasure?
40851	Will it not manifest more magnanimity, more rationality, to abide by it until we try it; instead of taking up a pen and dashing it out of existence?
40851	Will the adoption of these resolutions give us a single ship or gun?
40851	Will the gentleman say, that the direct tax was laid in order to enlarge the bounds of patronage?
40851	Will the gentlemen say that these judges are ambassadors, other public ministers or consuls, or that they are a state?
40851	Will the judges rudely declare that you have violated the constitution, unmindful of your duty, and regardless of your oath?
40851	Will the present repeal of the internal taxes interfere with the doing substantial justice to our merchants?
40851	Will the same navy be more efficacious in our case, than in the case of Holland, or Spain, or Portugal?
40851	Will these resolutions, then, said he, if adopted, tend to this point?
40851	Will they not say the President has done his duty in stating the fact?
40851	Will they remedy the evil by excluding the stenographers from places within the bar?
40851	Will this Government not be chargeable with having assisted in detaching such a colony from its Government?
40851	Will this satisfy the just expectation of our country?
40851	Will we not be classed with the robbers and destroyers of mankind?
40851	Will you call the militia from the North to assist their Southern brethren?
40851	Will you give up commerce, or build a Navy to protect it?
40851	Will you not, then, be obliged to make a general provision that all claims, so circumstanced, shall be allowed?
40851	Will you remember, sir, that they held the power of life and death, without appeal?
40851	Will you secure their seasonable aid, bring them early to the fields they are ordered to defend?
40851	Will you then confine the President, in relation to these powers, to a Peace Establishment?
40851	Will, then, Mr. Chairman, any gentleman hesitate a moment to pronounce the rule of apportionment which was adopted unjust, unequal, and erroneous?
40851	With all the deference to their talents, is not Congress as capable of forming a correct opinion as they are?
40851	With respect to the motion, Mr. L. asked, to whom was application to be made?
40851	With respect to the price of salt at Fort Pitt, as a gentleman had observed, it might be high, but was this occasioned by a duty?
40851	With that meek and peaceful spirit now so strongly recommended, we submitted to this insult, and what followed?
40851	With this knowledge, so plainly derivable from the policy pursued by the Legislature, what was the Secretary of the Navy to do?
40851	Without meeting?
40851	Wonderful indeed is this sudden disposition to confidence?
40851	Would any gentleman say that it was policy not to legislate about 700,000 enemies in the very body of the United States?
40851	Would any man, said Mr. H., who shall read this passage, say that the system of these gentlemen is a peace system?
40851	Would any person deny that, through the agency of the Executive, constitutionally exercised, the injury was redressed?
40851	Would calmness be consistent if entering wedges were prepared to ruin the property of whole estates?
40851	Would conduct like this comport with the gentleman''s ideas of national honor, about which we have heard so much in the course of this debate?
40851	Would gentlemen feel calm if measures were taken to destroy most of their property?
40851	Would gentlemen say that the Executive ought to appoint persons to office who professed an opinion contrary to its own?
40851	Would he have had the people of the United States relinquish without a struggle those liberties which had cost so much blood and treasure?
40851	Would he march at the head of the_ posse comitatus_?
40851	Would he place the memory of WASHINGTON on a footing with that of a rich man''s mistress?
40851	Would it be more respectful that an answer should be sent by this House, which, for want of time, had not been sufficiently considered?
40851	Would it have been a proper return for the unanimity with which your committee was chosen?
40851	Would it have tended to conciliate?
40851	Would it not be absurd still to say, that the removed judge held his office during good behavior?
40851	Would it not involve an inconsistency, that ought not certainly to be chargeable upon the framers of the constitution?
40851	Would it not place the Territory in the situation of a conquered country?
40851	Would not public opinion be as ready to sanction the one as the other of these detestable acts?
40851	Would not such a procedure subject us to the just censure of the world, and to the strongest jealousy of those who have possessions near to us?
40851	Would not the French say, if they were applied to for redress,"You knew these were pirates; why did you not defend yourselves against them?"
40851	Would not the House have contravened the constitution, by taking from the President the power which by it is placed in him?
40851	Would not the people of this country think it their duty to destroy a power which could not be trusted; and would not foreigners despise it?
40851	Would not these two give to the legislature a majority?
40851	Would not this be a most extraordinary doctrine?
40851	Would not this be to acknowledge that there our regulation pinched her?
40851	Would not this be to impair the tenure of the office which was abolished, or to which another officer might have been appointed by a new regulation?
40851	Would such a procedure meet the approbation of even our own citizens, whose lives and fortunes would be risked in the conflict?
40851	Would the civil jurisdiction of the town have repelled the bayonet?
40851	Would the committee be willing that Savannah should be erased from the revenue?
40851	Would the decree stop the importation of British goods?
40851	Would the gentleman yet wish to leave the District without laws, and merely lest it should take away their suffrage?
40851	Would the gentleman, then, inform the House what point he wished to ascertain, or in what he expected additional proof?
40851	Would there be a power in Virginia and Maryland, if receded, to prevent a resumption?
40851	Would they admit that he falsely made the claim?
40851	Would they discard the property of that class of citizens who depended upon it for their support and their wealth?
40851	Would they not laugh at you when you told them their term of office was out?
40851	Would they not say, in the language of the gentleman from New York, though the law that creates us is temporary, we are in by the constitution?
40851	Would they not say, we belong to inferior courts?
40851	Would this be the way to keep the Government together, or to preserve harmony in the country?
40851	Would you annihilate a system because some men under part of it had acted wrong?
40851	Would you know the sentiment of England?
40851	Would your national honor be free from imputation by a conduct of such inconsistency and duplicity?
40851	Yes, he would answer; else how could an appropriation in general terms have been made for the intercourse with foreign nations?
40851	Yes, sir, we wish for peace; but how is that blessing to be preserved?
40851	Yet, what superior advantage have they in the Government generally?
40851	You are to inquire how he became possessed of a certain bill which he published; what kind of an inquiry is this?
40851	Your press might have been enchained till doomsday, your citizens incarcerated for life, and where is your remedy?
40851	[ Mr. ALLEN exclaimed, who said it?]
40851	[ Mr. HARPER asked if there was any question before the committee?]
40851	[ Mr. OTIS asked who were to be the judges?]
40851	[ Mr. RUTLEDGE asked whether this had been done?
40851	and are not our resources increasing with our population?
40851	and asking those whose duty it was to inquire, is there no sedition here?
40851	and did he not see that that would be a check upon the abuse of it in either House, since it was a weapon which both could use?
40851	and have we not done all we can conveniently do for the defence of our commerce?
40851	and if the effect of his resolution should be to show that the stipulations are injurious to our rights, would he know how to act?
40851	and in what cases they were to defend themselves?
40851	and of course are we not prohibited from establishing one system in one place, and a different system in another?
40851	and that however flagrant that abuse of power, it is remediless, and must be submitted to?
40851	and whether, if they do say so, the fact ought not to be inquired into?
40851	and will you punish every man who shall repeat, print, or publish what is made public on this floor?
40851	and, if Congress had that cognizance before that time, have those amendments taken it away?
40851	asked, could be placed in a nation which one day makes a treaty, and the next violates it?
40851	but I do not think it is any evil; would he have these people turned out in the United States to ravage, murder, and commit every species of crime?
40851	conquer France?
40851	did the Government say it?
40851	for money from the poor without law?
40851	is it no crime to publish a bill while before this House?
40851	is it possible that I have heard such a sentiment in this body?
40851	on the duties which he now pays?
40851	on what did this claim rest?
40851	or a murder committed on board such a frigate, against the peace of any other than the British Government?
40851	or in a court independent of any influence whatever?
40851	or what connection had we with, any other, besides commercial?
40851	or, Thirdly, whether they can be made by law?
40851	said Mr. S., would it be to carry humility in his front to say,"I come to place you on the same footing with the most favored nation?"
40851	said he, can it be supposed that three frigates would give us that ridiculous kind of spirit which would induce us at any rate to go to war?
40851	to collect it; but what was twenty- five compared with three hundred per cent.?
40851	was it not enough to submit to injury; shall we not only receive the stripes, but kiss the rod that inflicts them?
40851	with restrictions, perhaps, to guard against the fraudulent usurpation of our flag?
40499	If it should be the judgment of Congress that it would be most expedient--what can be more explicit than this language?
40499	In this case, shall a secure port be stipulated, and the pecuniary and honorary considerations granted?
40499	--The question, I apprehend, is whether we will take the petition up for a second reading, and not whether it shall be committed?
40499	112; difficult to see where the danger lies, 112; what is meant by responsibility?
40499	116; is five thousand dollars in proportion to the services of the Vice President?
40499	197; can two parties exist in a well organized government to dispute about property and have no judge?
40499	197; is not the want of consideration a good plea?
40499	230; plans of the friends of emancipation, 231; negroes are inferior race, 231; slavery is no new thing, 231; does slavery weaken the Southern States?
40499	231; is public opinion against slavery?
40499	232; this squeamishness is very extraordinary, 232; consequences of emancipation, 233; if importation prohibited, will that species become extinct?
40499	233; does slavery vitiate and debase the mind of the owner?
40499	233; does toleration of slavery bring reproach on America?
40499	233; will the abolition strengthen South Carolina?
40499	234; was South Carolina wanting in patriotism?
40499	318; peace concluded April, 1783, 318; what was the intention of the parties in this contract?
40499	318; what does the law of nations say?
40499	318; when did the war end?
40499	324; is it expedient to do it?
40499	59; what are the objects of Government-- revenue one of the first?
40499	647; view of legislative and treaty- making powers, 648; how is the will of the people expressed in the constitution to be understood?
40499	676; is it paramount to a law, and can it repeal law, although itself can not be acted upon by the legislative power?
40499	89; the power of removal exists somewhere, and where?
40499	A Treaty is a bargain between nations binding in good faith; and what makes a bargain?
40499	A gentleman has asked, what is meant by responsibility?
40499	A gentleman has said, that Parliament interfered, not to violate, but to perfect the contract: but what did Parliament do?
40499	A sufficient force must be raised for their defence; and the only question now to be considered is, what that force shall be?
40499	AMES.--I wish the committee may consider, with the attention the subject demands, whether the duties are too high or not?
40499	AMES.--If we are to go to war, will it not be a prodigious saving of expense to have all matters ready beforehand?
40499	After a silence of some minutes, Mr. LIVERMORE asked, what part of the report it was expected that gentlemen should speak to?
40499	After all, however, should the unlimited powers he had mentioned( and such powers must always be unlimited) be wantonly abused, was there no remedy?
40499	After having thus formed his opinion relative to the Treaty, his next inquiry was, is the Treaty constitutional?
40499	After these preliminary observations, Mr. H. proceeded to inquire, not what ought to be, but what was the Constitution of the United States?
40499	Again, what may be the result of the precedent relating to the session of Congress?
40499	Also, gentlemen declared they would not recede from their former determinations; did they expect that the majority would recede?
40499	And On the previous question,"Shall the said main question be now put?"
40499	And although the excise may be somewhat unpopular, although money may still be wanted; what is the excise?
40499	And are we( said Mr. S.) to stand up here, and tell the world that we dare not perform an act of benevolence?
40499	And are we, meanwhile, to remain inactive and irresolute, and make no efforts to repel their intended attacks?
40499	And between the Vice President and the Senate?
40499	And can an act possibly meet the disapprobation of a single person which does not infringe his rights, and which puts money into his pocket?
40499	And can not he infuse his dangerous and specious arguments and information into them as well in the closet, as by a public and official communication?
40499	And can we be so unreasonable as to suppose that they would ever consent to a Treaty that had not such terms of reciprocity?
40499	And demanded, if, by the purchase, they were divested of that quality?
40499	And did the United States pass laws to punish the counterfeiting the notes of that bank?
40499	And do not all those nations, as well as every other, come into our ports on the same terms with the British?
40499	And do we, in the last case, say to these unfortunate sufferers, commence suits against those who have injured you?
40499	And does not the constitution expressly declare that the House solely shall exercise the power of originating revenue bills?
40499	And had all their professions been only a veil to hide their love of power?
40499	And had the prosecution succeeded, would the Secretary have had an appeal to the public?
40499	And have we not the volunteers, sir, in this country to protect our rights?
40499	And here he would inquire if the Codorus Creek, which runs through Yorktown into the Susquehanna, was, or could be made navigable?
40499	And how can you discriminate such claims from those rising from savage depredations on your frontier settlers?
40499	And how would it be relished by them?
40499	And if they are given up, how are we to form seamen to man our future navy?
40499	And if war had been the consequence, how were we to have recovered the amount of the spoliations committed on the property of our merchants?
40499	And if, of right, they can carry these into effect, will they regard the means, though they be expressly pointed out?
40499	And if, under these circumstances, abused, would the injury be more tolerable?
40499	And is it not a principle that taxation and representation ought to go hand and hand?
40499	And is it not strange?
40499	And is not the sum now proposed more than either the first or last holder, till within these few days, supposed would be paid him?
40499	And is not the sum now proposed, more than either the first or last assignee ever contemplated, till within a few days past, would ever be paid him?
40499	And is this indiscriminate charge, without the least respect to characters, a decent or a just return for a conduct like this?
40499	And on the previous question,"Shall the main question be now put?"
40499	And on the previous question,"Shall the said main question be now put?"
40499	And on the question, Shall the main question be now put?
40499	And on the question, shall the main question be now put?
40499	And pray, sir, what in the world is equal to it?
40499	And shall we now hesitate, and tamely suffer them to dictate to us?
40499	And the question was then put, Shall this bill be rejected?
40499	And then the main question being put, Do the House agree to the said third resolution, as reported by the Committee of the whole House?
40499	And then the main question,"That the House do agree to the said resolution?"
40499	And to guard herself against such measures, may we not expect she will lay her hand upon all our property on the ocean?
40499	And were they not partial ministers of their own acknowledged principles?
40499	And were they to judge for the whole Continent?
40499	And what might not be the consequence of their awakening from their lethargy?
40499	And what must be their astonishment when they hear that some people amongst us think that Great Britain has conferred no favor upon us by doing it?
40499	And what was the slender basis on which the presumption was built?
40499	And what, sir, would otherwise be the result?
40499	And whether certain tracts of land should be reserved by Congress for certain purposes?
40499	And whom, sir, do we mean to gratify?
40499	And why depend on Portugal?
40499	And why, let me ask, shall we go and fix upon the banks of a rapid river, when we can have a more healthful situation?
40499	And will the enemy wait till they can be collected?
40499	And would gentlemen say that the negotiation had not been attended with beneficial consequences to this country?
40499	And would not this be a greater advantage to the United States than if they went up the rivers St. Lawrence or Mississippi, and paid no duty?
40499	And, after he had employed an agent to make a contract, with full discretion, and he had in pursuance of his authority made it, was it not binding?
40499	And, if we have, are we not to make use of it in judging of the expediency or inexpediency of the Treaty?
40499	And, secondly, Were there 60,000 inhabitants in the Territory?
40499	And, secondly, will such a construction warrant the establishment of the Bank?
40499	Are Republicans irresponsible?
40499	Are crimes more frequent in that country than in the other States?
40499	Are crimes more frequently committed there?
40499	Are despots alone to be reproached for unfeeling indifference to the tears and blood of their subjects?
40499	Are gentlemen afraid to leave them to their own unbiased judgment?
40499	Are gentlemen apprehensive we shall be led by this officer to adopt plans we should otherwise reject?
40499	Are not the annual revenues sufficient?
40499	Are not their capitals for trade larger than ours?
40499	Are our debts ascertained?
40499	Are taxes to be paid exclusively by the rich?
40499	Are the PRESIDENT and two- thirds of the Senate Congress?
40499	Are the eastern members to dictate in this business, and fix the seat of Government of the United States?
40499	Are the posts to remain for ever in the possession of Great Britain?
40499	Are the services of the Senate of more importance than those of the Representatives?
40499	Are the truths in it applicable to the great object we are about to decide?
40499	Are the very clods where we tread entitled to this ardent preference because they are greener?
40499	Are there more executions?
40499	Are these the men, asked Mr. C., who ought to have all this mass of Congressional odium cast upon them?
40499	Are they amenable to the people for their conduct?
40499	Are they not a polished people, sensible of the rights of mankind, and actuated by proper sentiments of humanity?
40499	Are they not continuing to do so, and is it not in contemplation to sell large quantities of lands in that country, that have never been purchased?
40499	Are they the men to swallow their resentments, who so lately were choking with them?
40499	Are they the only people whose feelings are to be consulted on this occasion?
40499	Are they the only persons who possess religion and morality?
40499	Are they to look into another bill for that purpose?
40499	Are they, for the stealing of a horse, or some such thing, to cross the line in armed bodies, and act just as they please?
40499	Are we afraid that the President and Senate are not sufficiently informed to know their respective duties?
40499	Are we never to stand upon a certain and solid foundation?
40499	Are we not now sitting, in our sober discretion, a General Government, without the semblance of restraint?
40499	Are we not so deeply in debt as to give us reason to believe that it will require many years to emancipate ourselves?
40499	Are we not the sole judges; have we not a right to determine for ourselves?
40499	Are we sure that it will come back into our possession again?
40499	Are we to apply to foreign banks or individuals?
40499	Are we to apply to the banks already established in the States for loans?
40499	Are we to depend, then, on taxes for commanding money in cases of urgent necessity?
40499	Are we to say, we will not be bound by your transfer, we will not treat with your representative, but insist upon a resettlement with you alone?
40499	Are we to send a special committee to inform them?
40499	Are we to take the circuitous route of impeachment?
40499	Are you prepared to do so just now?
40499	Are you ready to answer?
40499	Are you ready to speak in your defence?
40499	As to the flag, how can it require an answer from the Senate?
40499	As to the third point, should not his estate be indemnified?
40499	BOUDINOT.--The question seems to turn merely on this point, whether the Vice President shall receive a per diem allowance, or an annual salary?
40499	Be it so-- what follows?
40499	Besides, where will this business of censorship end?
40499	But I ask gentlemen, whether Great Britain ever laid such a high duty in the first instance, as we are about to impose?
40499	But I would ask if there is any power under heaven which could not be exercised within the extensive limits of this preamble?
40499	But a distrust of the States is shown in every movement of Congress-- will not this implant distrust also in the States?
40499	But admitting that they would not fight, to what would the argument lead?
40499	But am I reduced to the necessity of proving this point?
40499	But are not gentlemen who come from the most distant parts of the Union, compelled to relinquish every thing to attend here?
40499	But are, he asked, gentlemen serious in these observations?
40499	But can public necessity be urged in the present case to justify this kind of political robbery?
40499	But did all this put an end to the war?
40499	But did they want to bring forward an impeachment?
40499	But do gentlemen consider the consequences of throwing all internal defence and distant expeditions upon the militia?
40499	But from which of these measures is danger to be apprehended?
40499	But gentlemen say,"Have we not as much power as the House of Commons in Great Britain?"
40499	But he asked, if such would not be a vain attempt?
40499	But he would ask those gentlemen, by whom the Government was to be dissolved?
40499	But how do gentlemen handle this question?
40499	But how does Congress get this power?
40499	But how does it interpose and compel?
40499	But how is it they are more concerned in this business than others?
40499	But how will you prevent them?
40499	But if it be partial or oppressive, are there not many instances in which we have laid taxes of this nature?
40499	But if it was politic to lay an impost on cordage, would it not be the same with regard to hemp?
40499	But if this were doubtful, where should they look for information?
40499	But if you have two hands, both in the fire at once, will you pull out one before the other?
40499	But is Congress going to legislate by strength of arm?
40499	But is not the Secretary of the Treasury subject to blame?
40499	But is there occasion for amendments to the Treaty- making power?
40499	But is this the case of the domestic creditor of the United States?
40499	But it is asked, if this Treaty be so unfavorable to commerce, why are the merchants so much in favor of it?
40499	But it may be demanded, how are the frontiers to be protected, if the army was disbanded?
40499	But it might be objected that a power so enormous, and comprehending such essential interests, might be abused, and thence asked, where is the remedy?
40499	But let me ask, will not this as effectually destroy some parts, as if the correction had been made by way of incorporation?
40499	But on what are a committee to confer?
40499	But suppose they decline doing what you require, what is next to be done?
40499	But supposing it to be done away, how do the constitutions of the different States stand on this head?
40499	But the question is, what is that will, as expressed in the constitution?
40499	But was South Carolina, at the commencement of the war, with all her slaves, backward in her resistance to Great Britain?
40499	But was there no justice also due to the people of the United States?
40499	But was this done by striking out and inserting other words in the great charter?
40499	But were there no other ways of cancelling a Treaty?
40499	But what are their immediate representatives to do, in case the bill be made perpetual?
40499	But what did he do?
40499	But what did the gentlemen who have delivered their sentiments say?
40499	But what does this signify?
40499	But what effect do these men suppose will arise from their exertions?
40499	But what funds are to defray the increased expense of maintaining such a force as is now contemplated?
40499	But what has been the practice?
40499	But what has been the result of the system which has been pursued ever since?
40499	But what has the House to do with this; or why should it become the censor and promulgator of the speeches of its own members?
40499	But what have been the fruits of it?
40499	But what have the citizens of the other States to do with our slaves?
40499	But what is a law?
40499	But what is the necessity of having a numerous representation?
40499	But what is the object of the motion?
40499	But what is the objection?
40499	But what is this general welfare?
40499	But what is this liberty which some appear to be so fond of?
40499	But what is to prevent the greatest imposition in this business?
40499	But what more can we do than pass a law for the purpose?
40499	But what occasion is there for adopting such a resolution?
40499	But what was the case?
40499	But what would become of the acts of Congress?
40499	But what, in this state of things, would restrain their piratical cruisers in the West Indies?
40499	But where is the necessity of raising the impost to this degree?
40499	But where was the government that had funded its debts under the circumstances of the American debt?
40499	But who started this question?
40499	But why did the creditors part with their acknowledgment of the debt?
40499	But why do these men set themselves up in such a particular manner against slavery?
40499	But why is this degree of caution necessary?
40499	But why is this desirable?
40499	But why should we lose time to examine the theory when it is in our power to resort to experience?
40499	But why will gentlemen contend for incorporating amendments into the constitution?
40499	But why, Mr. Chairman, should we hasten on this business of funding?
40499	But would gentlemen infer from hence, that no alteration ought to take place if the manufactures were well established?
40499	But, asked he, are precedents in war to justify violations of private and State rights in a time of peace?
40499	But, if the sum voted was too small, what would be the consequence?
40499	But, in taking the principle of territory, are the House to calculate on the uninhabited wilderness?
40499	But, instead of this, what is proposed?
40499	But, let me ask, if the Treaty should not be carried into effect, will that relieve that deserving class of our citizens?
40499	But, said Mr. W., let us waive this subject, and inquire if negotiation had failed, whether war would not have been the consequence?
40499	But, say those who hide the absurdity under the cover of ambiguous phrases, have we no discretion?
40499	But, sir, is the whole morality of the United States confined to the Quakers?
40499	But, sir, what is the situation of the people who hold these bills?
40499	By applying proper rules of interpretation?
40499	By emissions of bills of credit?
40499	By loans at home?
40499	By taxes?
40499	By what magic can it be made to appear it will be more proper at the end of ten years?
40499	By what provision of the constitution is the Treaty- making power, agreeably to the construction of the gentlemen, limited?
40499	By whom, then, he would ask again, was the Government to be dissolved?
40499	Can a market be obtained without the merchant?
40499	Can any body of men to be raised in this country tread down the substantial yeomanry?
40499	Can any of the Secretary''s plans be called bills?
40499	Can any person, who has read our constitution, believe that it is in our power to pass a law without limitation?
40499	Can any reason be assigned for making this distinction?
40499	Can any solid argument against the resolution on the table arise from a conduct of this kind?
40499	Can any thing show more friendly to the Union than adopting the constitution, and sending us here to administer it?
40499	Can any thing tend more to make men think themselves mean, or degrade to a lower point their estimation of virtue and their standard of action?
40499	Can gentlemen state more serious apprehensions in the former than the latter case?
40499	Can it be supposed it would be necessary, said he, to give any member of this House double pay to accept of the office?
40499	Can it be supposed that a part will be more desirous of promoting the good of the whole than the whole will of the part?
40499	Can it be supposed that such a character as this is influenced by such a motive?
40499	Can it be supposed that the name of Senators will render those members superior to their fellow- citizens?
40499	Can not his friends introduce it as their own, by making and seconding a motion for that purpose?
40499	Can the House listen seriously to such a proposition?
40499	Can the advocates of the amendment even affect apprehensions that there is any intention to introduce a foreign nobility as a privileged order?
40499	Can the human mind retain, with any great degree of decision, objects so extensive and multifarious upon a mere oral communication?
40499	Can there be any foundation for alarm, when Congress expressly declare, that they have no power of interference prior to the year 1808?
40499	Can they expect the planters to come in a body, and take off their goods upon their arrival?
40499	Can things certain be balanced by things uncertain?
40499	Can this Government, said he, protect its officers from the resentment of any one State in the Union?
40499	Can this be the inference of common sense?
40499	Can this possibly be a true construction of the Treaty- making power?
40499	Can this, then, he would ask, be a bill proper to perpetuate, or fit for the restoration of the credit of the United States?
40499	Can two parties exist in a well organized Government to dispute about property, and have no judge?
40499	Can we desire any thing more ardently than a termination of the Indian war?
40499	Can we find that she ever imposed a duty of six cents per gallon on molasses?
40499	Can we retribute the sufferings which have been caused by the depreciation of our currency?
40499	Can you then recover the money back again?
40499	Certainly gentlemen would not pretend to bestow a privilege upon a man which he is incapable of using?
40499	Congress having no money to give them, offered something; what?
40499	Constituents made no scruple to tell Representatives of their faults, and he saw no reason why Representatives might not tell constituents of theirs?
40499	Could any man tell?
40499	Could any possible wrong be done to those who hold the domestic debt, by estimating it at its current value?
40499	Could he look with affection and veneration to such a country as his parent?
40499	Could it be pretended there was a shadow of authority given to the House of Representatives?
40499	Could the House, in this case, exercise its discretion, whether or no a Convention should be called?
40499	Could this be the fair construction of our so much boasted constitution?
40499	Could we say, in such a case, that the tax had been uniform?
40499	Did France before this war give us free trade to her colonies?
40499	Did Holland, before the present war, open to us all her rich possessions in the East Indies?
40499	Did any gentleman think there was sufficient evil in the late Treaty with Great Britain to authorize them in refusing to carry it into effect?
40499	Did any member wish at this period to attempt this inquiry?
40499	Did gentlemen wish to re- establish a temporary Territorial Government there?
40499	Did he imagine that, as it is, they are not kept in a perpetual state of alarm, of exertion, and of danger?
40499	Did it authorize a perpetual tax, irrepealable by the whole Legislature, without a breach of faith, according to received doctrine?
40499	Did it authorize a plan for supplying former deficiencies, which it is admitted do not exist?
40499	Did it authorize an entire provision for the public debt, past, present, and to come?
40499	Did it bear a proportion to his services, or was it in proportion to what the members of the Senate and this House were to be allowed?
40499	Did it condemn the doctrine of the majority?
40499	Did it encourage the hopes of those who wished the establishment of Government upon the principle of equal rights?
40499	Did it lead to a discovery of truth?
40499	Did it not rivet the chains upon the people of England?
40499	Did it render the people of Ireland more respectable in the eyes of the people of the United States?
40499	Did not New York dispose of lands within her chartered limits, and from the sales become wealthy, as she has large sums in the funds?
40499	Did not duty require a provision for the defence and safety of the United States by_ internal_ resources?
40499	Did not this mean something more than the bare discharge of their expenses?
40499	Did the General enter into these engagements out of personal regard to individuals, without a view to the public interest?
40499	Did the House imagine that their censure, like the wand of a magician, would lay a spell on these people?
40499	Did the Secretary apply the money borrowed in Europe agreeably to the legal appropriations and the instructions of the PRESIDENT?
40499	Did the Secretary of the Treasury apply the money to other uses than the law directed?
40499	Did the soldier accept of this offer?
40499	Did these acts originate with the Executive?
40499	Did they consider this House as the only branch from which any danger was to be apprehended?
40499	Did they contribute to strengthen the country against invasion by staying at home and joining the invader as soon as he was successful?
40499	Did they mean to rob the Almighty of what they call his prerogative?
40499	Did they mean, that the first event which would put an end to their own authority should be the last act of Government?
40499	Did they not refuse to correspond with any society that aided, or in any manner abetted, the insurrection?
40499	Did they not, in the most pointed manner, discountenance any such proceeding?
40499	Did they suspect the Legislature of doing wrong?
40499	Did they turn themselves to industry and useful pursuits?
40499	Did they, by their arms or contributions, establish our independence?
40499	Did this act of submission render them more respectable in the eyes of the people of England?
40499	Did this passage show that the PRESIDENT wanted them to intermeddle?
40499	Did we go to the Emperor of Morocco, or to the Dey of Algiers, and challenge a passage for our ships up the Mediterranean?
40499	Did we intend to rival the military establishments in Europe?
40499	Did we judiciously examine whether the spirit of the law accords with the habits and manners of the people?
40499	Do gentlemen conceive that on any occasion instructions would be so general as to proceed from all our constituents?
40499	Do gentlemen contemplate to what issue these principles would lead?
40499	Do gentlemen foresee the extent of these words?
40499	Do gentlemen imagine that State will join the Union?
40499	Do gentlemen mean that he shall give it piecemeal, by way of question and answer?
40499	Do gentlemen suppose our laws, like those of the Medes and Persians, unchangeable?
40499	Do gentlemen, said he, consider the importance of the power they give the officer by the clause?
40499	Do the United States avenge these murders?
40499	Do these gentlemen require any thing more respecting the powers of Congress, than a description of the ends of government?
40499	Do these men expect a general emancipation of slaves by law?
40499	Do they believe the capitals of those banks adequate to the exigencies of the nation?
40499	Do they demand back the property carried off?
40499	Do they leave their State and relinquish their occupations?
40499	Do they mean to purchase their freedom?
40499	Do they not admit that He is the source of all good, and can they refuse to acknowledge it?
40499	Do they not observe that the fate of the Government is deeply involved in the decision?
40499	Do they understand the rights of mankind, and the disposition of Providence, better than others?
40499	Do we charge bribery or corruption?
40499	Do we ever originate any money bill?
40499	Do we impeach the Executive?
40499	Do you know one Robert Randall?
40499	Do you mean to pay the principal and interest now due?
40499	Do you think we should pay the tax?
40499	Does Portugal open the Brazils?
40499	Does Spain open her rich islands in the East and West Indies, and her immense possessions in South America?
40499	Does any gentleman expect, while we have a public debt, to prevent speculation in our funds?
40499	Does any gentleman imagine that an officer is entitled to his office as to an estate?
40499	Does experience sanction such an opinion?
40499	Does he infer that the people can, in detached bodies, contravene an act established by the whole people?
40499	Does he mean that it shall lie dormant and never be exercised?
40499	Does it consist in the exaltation of one man, and the humiliation of the rest?
40499	Does it contain any thing which is not true?
40499	Does not that new order prohibit, as much as ever, American vessels from carrying provisions to the West India Islands?
40499	Does not the British Government wish to deprive us of this branch also?
40499	Does she not receive every thing which she could have demanded in relation to that Treaty?
40499	Does she, in the Treaty lately made, open even Florida, as Great Britain has Canada?
40499	Does the House believe this?
40499	Does the dignity of a nation consist in the distance between the first magistrate and his citizens?
40499	Does the gentleman conceive that such only are delegated as are expressed?
40499	Does the lawyer neglect his client?
40499	Does the merchant forego his commerce, or the farmer his agriculture?
40499	Does this look like a democracy, when one of the first acts of the two branches of the Legislature is to confer titles?
40499	Does this mean a part of the people in a township or district, or does it mean the representatives in the State Legislatures?
40499	First, what article shall be the subject of a particular tax, and what shall remain in the common mass liable to an impost_ ad valorem_?
40499	For what is the tendency of this counterfeit alarm?
40499	For what purpose, then, shall it be committed?
40499	For what reason have we made a difference between the President and Vice President?
40499	For what rights of a citizen will be deemed inviolable when a State renounces the principles that constitute their security?
40499	From whence, he asked, do we acquire the authority to exercise this power?
40499	Gentlemen had said, Shall this House not have as much power respecting Treaties as the House of Commons in Great Britain?
40499	Gentlemen on the other side had spoken of their feelings; did they suppose, he asked, that those who were in the majority had not feelings?
40499	Gentlemen say it will work injustice; but are we not as much bound to repair the injustice done by the United States?
40499	Gentlemen say the Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for the information he gives the House-- in what manner does this responsibility act?
40499	Gentlemen say-- why provide the money if it be not wanted?
40499	Gentlemen talked about impeachment?
40499	Government, in the most solemn manner, pledged itself to make compensation to the soldiers, have they done it?
40499	Grant it; but can they say that we shall never have a war with any European power?
40499	Great Britain obtained no soldiers from her East and West India settlements, were they therefore useless?
40499	Had experience proved that the negroes would not make good soldiers?
40499	Had it a concurrent right with the States?
40499	Had not our neutrality been the occasion of our wealth and prosperity?
40499	Had not the managers of our Government kept a watchful eye on our affairs?
40499	Had she a claim under the Treaty of 1783, which is forgotten?
40499	Had the Executive avowed the plan of the Secretary of War, or his reasoning?
40499	Had the public mind been less disturbed on the late Treaty than in 1793?
40499	Had they a right to assist in the formation of Treaties in such a manner as that a Treaty would be incomplete without their sanction officially given?
40499	Had they done so?
40499	Had they not a claim on the House to adopt such means as would enable the citizens in every State to judge of the propriety of public measures?
40499	Had this done any good to the cause?
40499	Has not the Legislature done so before?
40499	Has that been altered since by the incorporation of amendments?
40499	Has the constitution made this House a diplomatic body, invested with the powers of negotiation?
40499	Have any nations in the present European war, premised their operations by a declaration?
40499	Have not express charges, as well as vague rumors, been brought against him at the bar of the public?
40499	Have not the public a right to know the sentiments of the House on every question?
40499	Have the newspapers reprobated it?
40499	Have the principles on which you ground the reproach upon Cabinets and Kings no practical influence-- no binding force?
40499	Have there not bills originated in this House which have caused the expenditure of much money to very little purpose?
40499	Have these people here( the Democratic societies) any such opportunity?
40499	Have they any right to interfere with our internal policy?
40499	Have they not pushed conquests into the Indian country north- west of the Ohio?
40499	Have they precedent for this assertion?
40499	Have we heard any complaints against it?
40499	Have we not laid extra duties on various articles, expressly for the purpose of encouraging various branches of our own manufactures?
40499	Have we not, said he, been one of the happiest nations upon earth?
40499	Have we received a power to exercise in wantonly oppressing those who gave it?
40499	Have we, in truth, originated this money bill?
40499	Have you any proof to cite that you are not guilty?
40499	Have you got any new associates in this city?
40499	Having stated these preliminaries, Mr. B. proceeded to inquire what were the powers attempted to be exercised by this bill?
40499	Having this advantage, can it be doubted that we have not industry and enterprise to improve it?
40499	He adverted to the idea of direct taxation, and inquired, on what principle will gentlemen consent to this mode of raising the necessary supplies?
40499	He appealed to the feelings of every honorable man in the committee, whether demands for justice and reparation for injuries were enforced by threats?
40499	He asked if any of the States had ever established various rates for their lands?
40499	He asked if the Creeks performed a single tittle of the treaty of New York, about which there had been so much parade?
40499	He asked if, before the purchase, the certificates were debts due from the United States?
40499	He asked if, in the present situation of the country, all dependence was to be placed on commerce?
40499	He asked what better time there was than the present for settling the amount of these claims?
40499	He asked what would this countervail be?
40499	He asked whether this Government was intended for a temporary or a lasting one?
40499	He asked whether words could be devised that would place the new Government more precisely in the same relation to the real creditors with the old?
40499	He asked, if, in such a case, it was competent to the House rightfully to withhold the means necessary for the performance of the public engagement?
40499	He asked, upon parallel principles, what might Congress not do?
40499	He asked, what was the authority of the United States?
40499	He asked, who would lend us money, if there was such a difficulty in establishing funds to pay the interest of it?
40499	He had asked, why, since the PRESIDENT had proclaimed a Treaty as the law of the land, which was not the law of the land, why he was not impeached?
40499	He had said, how could they determine whether the Treaty was constitutional or not, or whether an impeachment was necessary, without information?
40499	He inquired how the gentleman proposed to get information?
40499	He inquired of him whether the House itself went into an investigation of facts in the first instance?
40499	He inquired whether the House were to sanction and authorize the reports of the proposed stenographer?
40499	He noticed the objection from banks banishing the specie; he said the surplus only would be sent out of the country; but is it given away?
40499	He only wanted to ask whether the call for yeas and nays was withdrawn or not?
40499	He proceeded to inquire whether this clause gives them the right to make Treaties the supreme law of the land?
40499	He said, gentlemen asked who would be offended or hurt by this plan?
40499	He then inquired what better time there could be for learning the number and extent of the losses than the present?
40499	He then inquired whether, under the existing state of things, the Treaty ought to be rejected?
40499	He then inquired, of what right does this incorporation deprive a single citizen?
40499	He thought it advisable to guard against abuses; but has this abuse not already taken place?
40499	He was next interrogated by the SPEAKER, as follows: Are you guilty, or not guilty?
40499	He was then asked, whether the call of yesterday was valid to- day, or if it was necessary for the members to rise over again?
40499	He would inquire how they became so?
40499	He would inquire what Treaties could be entered into by the PRESIDENT and Senate, without infringing upon the powers placed in Congress?
40499	His first inquiry, he said, should be, whether negroes were to be considered as property?
40499	How are the judges to determine in the case; are they to be guided in their decisions by the rules of expediency?
40499	How are those sentiments reconcilable to the oath we have taken?
40499	How are we to form one?
40499	How can gentlemen answer for this, who call themselves representatives, on the broad basis of national interest?
40499	How can it be such an_ ex post facto_ law as is prescribed by the constitution, when that expression is conjunctive with a bill of attainder?
40499	How can the business originate in this House, if we have it reported to us by the Minister of Finance?
40499	How can they reconcile their conduct?
40499	How can we help it?
40499	How could certain members reconcile this proceeding with their former votes and language?
40499	How could it then bear a comparison with that House, who were chosen by the whole people every two years?
40499	How could they annul a State law, when the State would be able to plead a precedent on the part of Congress?
40499	How could they be called freemen, if they were, against their consent, to be expelled from the country?
40499	How could they delegate a power to others which they did not possess themselves?
40499	How did that appear?
40499	How is this to be done?
40499	How long could an enlightened people remain in such a state of insensibility and torpor?
40499	How many of them are springing up in the Northern States?
40499	How many ways of proceeding lie open before us?
40499	How retaliate?
40499	How then can gentlemen assert that the powers of appointment and removal are incident to the Executive Department of Government?
40499	How then do you propose to restrain the Secretary of the Treasury?
40499	How then was he to find evidence of his behavior during such a length of time?
40499	How was that money applied, and what will now be necessary?
40499	How was this done?
40499	How was this to settle the principle of excise?
40499	How were they to regulate commerce?
40499	How were we to act?
40499	How will he please both?
40499	How will they know the laws, if we do not understand the constitution after it has been in operation for nearly eight years?
40499	How will this doctrine operate upon the power of appropriation?
40499	How would he embarrass his family and property in such engagements?
40499	How, then, can gentlemen from those States contend that the proposed duty is so much too high as to occasion the fatal consequences they foretell?
40499	How, then, can gentlemen reconcile their conduct of this day to the liberality they have hitherto shown?
40499	How, then, can gentlemen suppose the revenue ought to be perpetual, in order to be commensurate with the object?
40499	How, then, is it possible they can continue their trade, when you lop off another part of their capital?
40499	I am sensible this Treaty presents itself with an unfavorable aspect, and what is the reason?
40499	I ask again, Mr. Chairman, if the people of this country possess less power than the people of that despotic Government?
40499	I ask gentlemen, can there be a greater evil than this in any Government?
40499	I ask, further, when such attempts have been made, have they not failed of success?
40499	I asked those, as I might ask my colleague now, who of our constituents could calculate what he would save by any proposed reduction of our pay?
40499	I asked, is not the assignment of certificates confirmed by the motion?
40499	I asked, of what is the assignee deprived but of his late sanguine expectations?
40499	I asked, where is the injustice of the State''s complying with its engagements made to the first holders of certificates as far as the case admits?
40499	I asked, whether the proposition before us does not rather establish confidence in Government than the contrary?
40499	I can not, for my part, conceive how any person can be said to acquire a property in another; is it by virtue of conquest?
40499	I fear war as much as any man, when a pretext is given; but can it be seriously said a rejection of this Treaty is a cause of war?
40499	I resort especially to the convictions of the Western gentlemen, whether, supposing no posts and no Treaty, the settlers will remain in security?
40499	I say, would not such reflections, with ruin before our eyes, produce a degree of irritation in the most calm amongst us?
40499	I trust it is neither too presumptuous, nor too late to ask, can you put the dearest interest of society at risk without guilt, and without remorse?
40499	I will ask the gentleman by what precise authority he borrowed the money in Amsterdam and Antwerp, and paid it in Paris?
40499	I will ask, are they more?
40499	I will ask, though, is this country ever to be in a settled and quiet state?
40499	I will ask, was it ever known in a Treaty, that a stipulation was made to give up property plundered after the peace?
40499	I wish, therefore, to be ascertained of one fact, do the army wish a measure of this kind to take place?
40499	I wonder where they are going so cheerfully?"
40499	I would ask what state we were in then?
40499	I would ask, if the other members of the Union are not also to be consulted?
40499	I would beg to ask those, then, who are desirous of freeing the negroes, if they have funds sufficient to pay for them?
40499	If I receive a favor, what but the sentiment of gratitude ought to direct me in my acknowledgments?
40499	If a cargo of nails were to be sent to Carolina, I would be glad to know how we are to purchase it?
40499	If a law is the expression of the will, must not an appropriation law be equally so?
40499	If a permanent seat is established, why not go to it immediately?
40499	If a war should suddenly break out, how is Congress to provide for it?
40499	If a wish of Congress can bring them into the Union, why should we decline to express such a wish?
40499	If any article is warranted on this account, how much more are we authorized to proceed on this occasion?
40499	If authority beyond this is assumed, however trifling the encroachment at first, where will it stop?
40499	If by the ill- timed promulgation of this report, we have laid the foundation for the calamity, ought we not to counteract it?
40499	If every member is to be bound by instructions how to vote, what are gentlemen from the extremities of the continent to do?
40499	If future difficulties should involve that nation still further, what must be the consequence?
40499	If he can not be removed, I should suppose he can not be suspended; and what security have the people against the machinations of a bad man in office?
40499	If his father had lived a few years longer, would there have arisen any question on this subject?
40499	If it be true, then, can the PRESIDENT repeal, as he has by the Treaty, the laws of Congress, although by the constitution he can not negative them?
40499	If it is inquired where we are to draw the line of a liberal construction, I will also inquire where the line of restriction is to be drawn?
40499	If it is, is the conclusion not obvious, that Congress have power to pass laws for carrying these powers into effect?
40499	If merchants can not get insurance, will they send their vessels out?
40499	If not, then, 2dly, Whether both, or either, and which of them, ought to be ratified?
40499	If our Senate should take any unwarrantable stride towards aristocracy, have we not the power to check them?
40499	If sequestration is hostility, as he had heard it called, what, he asked, is condemnation?
40499	If so, to what an extent must they go?
40499	If so, what was that expense, or what will be the probable increase?
40499	If so, will there be any economy in this mode of procedure?
40499	If suspicion had so long existed against the integrity of the Secretary, why was not information called for at the beginning of the session?
40499	If that was done, the Government would be removed to the Potomac; if not, we should stop short of it; and what would be the consequence?
40499	If the House undertake to censure particular classes of men, who can tell where they will stop?
40499	If the Indians are to be kept in peace by bribes, why not, in this, as in other similar cases, by presents and pecuniary rewards?
40499	If the PRESIDENT and two- thirds of the Senate have a right to make a law, do Congress make all laws?
40499	If the Potomac is struck out, are you sure of getting Baltimore?
40499	If the Secretary has paid what was due, what then is the complaint?
40499	If the Treaty had been the most complete and satisfactory, would it not be necessary to leave something to enforce its execution?
40499	If the controlling influence of this House was added, would the power be less?
40499	If the country had been plunged into a war, would it be as flourishing as it is?
40499	If the member from Virginia( Mr. GILES) had been opposed to the Treaty going into operation, why did he not take the proper mode to prevent it?
40499	If the next Legislature were disposed to violate the public honor, would the law now under consideration stand in their way?
40499	If the officer misbehaves, he can be removed by impeachment; but in this case is impeachment the only mode of removal?
40499	If the power flows from the nature and necessity of the case, it may be demanded, is the renot equal authority for the Bank?
40499	If the thing is in itself right, why refuse to vote directly for it?
40499	If then the fishermen ask you to restore only their own money, will you deny them?
40499	If these facts are established by the committee, would it give equal satisfaction as if they were established by the House?
40499	If these were really their sentiments, why did they not abide by them?
40499	If they are, will they take them by force?
40499	If they come here with badges at their button- holes, can you forbid them?
40499	If they do, what is the injury arising from the adoption of the resolution intended to be submitted to the committee?
40499	If they had such an abhorrence for slavery, why, said Mr. S., did they not cast us off and reject our alliance?
40499	If they intermeddle in the business of sailors, why not in that of manufacturers and farmers?
40499	If they will not be content with that, shall it be committed to investigate facts?
40499	If this argument was founded in fact, it would put an end to all debates on all the new taxes; but what was this notable discovery?
40499	If this doctrine prevails, to what a situation would the Representatives of a free people be reduced?
40499	If this is the case, does it not imply a censure by the House on certain characters?
40499	If this is the case, is there any person of humanity that would not wish to prevent them?
40499	If this is the case, will a revenue law for one or two years bring that relief which is expected?
40499	If this is to be adduced as a proof of the popularity of a measure, what are we to say with respect to a tax on tea?
40499	If this right was denied them, where would the principle stop?
40499	If this system should prevail, were we to receive British productions through other countries?
40499	If to continue in session be an evil, why are we here?
40499	If we are parties, what would be the decision before a court of justice?
40499	If we do not mean to deceive, why not make the provision commensurate to the occasion?
40499	If we pay this attention to them, in one instance, what good reason is there for contemning them in another?
40499	If we refuse to say that the act itself is a crime, how can we condemn Randall as criminal?
40499	If we relinquish this branch of the cod fishery, what is left us?
40499	If we should go as far South as Baltimore, why not an equal distance south- west to the Potomac?
40499	If what he said was not sufficient to disprove it, he asked where is the evidence to support it?
40499	If you do not mean to indemnify, why inquire at all?
40499	If, then, they chose to yield one species of property, might they not another?
40499	If, therefore, some interpretation of the constitution must be indulged, by what rules is it to be governed?
40499	If, therefore, we are forewarned, ought we not to be forearmed?
40499	In addition to the loss of this Government, would not every member of the Legislature, he asked, lose his character, credit, and reputation?
40499	In case of an army establishment, for example, suppose the PRESIDENT or Senate were to refuse their assent to the repeal of a law establishing it?
40499	In cases of a more serious kind, is not sentiment the only prompt and enlightened guide of our conduct?
40499	In discussing the question, he inquired, What has Congress already done?
40499	In favor of the militia, it may be asked, who fought the battle of Bunker''s Hill?
40499	In many cases the Executives are not in particular vested with the power of appointment; and do they exercise that power by virtue of their office?
40499	In short, was not this a kind of argument infinitely more tending to the production of prejudice than to the discovery of truth?
40499	In spite of this mock solemnity, I demand, if the House will not concur in the measure to execute the Treaty, what other course shall we take?
40499	In such case, may not titles do an injury to the Union?
40499	In this case a question arises: What is, upon the whole, most just and expedient?
40499	In what does the case differ between the depreciated paper and the certificates?
40499	In what manner had this trust been carried into execution?
40499	In what mode are the memorialists to be informed of our humane dispositions?
40499	Instead of Baltimore, is it not probable we may have Susquehanna inserted, perhaps the Delaware?
40499	Is Congress vested with power to grant privileges contained in the bill?
40499	Is he absolutely bound to perform what he is instructed to do?
40499	Is his maxim supported by precedent drawn from the practice of the individual States?
40499	Is it a narrow affection for the spot where a man was born?
40499	Is it among the archives?
40499	Is it because the feelings of the Friends will be hurt to have their affair conducted in the usual course of business?
40499	Is it contended to be out of order?
40499	Is it expected that a Senator shall eat more, or drink more costly liquors, than a member of the House of Representatives?
40499	Is it expected, said Mr. N., that I am to abandon my independence for the sake of the PRESIDENT?
40499	Is it for the_ undaunted_ and_ energetic_ countenance of the cause of France, in her struggle for freeing herself from despotic shackles?
40499	Is it from such a nation( he asked) that we are to hope for justice?
40499	Is it limited by any law past?
40499	Is it limited by the provisions with respect to appropriations?
40499	Is it necessary to add, that a powerful body of seamen, at some future day, may save us from the vast expense and danger of a standing army?
40499	Is it necessary, or was it ever thought so, to make it a stipulation by Treaty?
40499	Is it not an established principle amongst all civilized nations, that plundered property shall be given up?
40499	Is it not because we have entertained too exalted ideas of our own national importance?
40499	Is it not implied by all of them, that certain oaths, residence, and property, make the requisites to form citizenship?
40499	Is it not on account of his superior station and his dignity?
40499	Is it not our business to inquire into the cause of this strange conduct?
40499	Is it not part of our legislative authority?
40499	Is it not sufficient that their time and talents are given to the public?
40499	Is it not the duty of the House to check this spirit of devastation?
40499	Is it our present President?
40499	Is it polite, is it generous, to force him to renounce it?
40499	Is it politic and wise, then, Mr. Chairman, to exert the power contended for, even if it be authorized by the constitution?
40499	Is it possible that any man can be hardy enough to avow them, and their ridiculous consequences?
40499	Is it possible that these societies can exist, for any length of time, when they are of no real use to the country?
40499	Is it possible to transport the revenue from one end of the continent to the other?
40499	Is it pretended that the services and supplies were an inadequate compensation?
40499	Is it reasonable to expect that men should sacrifice domestic ease and the interests of their families to serve their country?
40499	Is it supposed that all this matter can go off without any noise or combustion?
40499	Is it the_ manly_ demand of restitution made of Great Britain for her accumulated injuries that called forth the praise?
40499	Is it to rouse again the sleeping apparitions which have disturbed the back country?
40499	Is it to show that the mock dangers which they have pretended to dread are real?
40499	Is it to them we owe our present happiness?
40499	Is it true, that an unwillingness to pay debts hath been the principal cause of opposition to this Treaty?
40499	Is it within the powers of this Congress to grant bounties?
40499	Is it worthy the attention of Government that the cod fishery should be preserved?
40499	Is it written?
40499	Is not our public credit totally gone?
40499	Is not the assignment of the certificates confirmed by the nation?
40499	Is not the present a most favorable opportunity for holding up these people to popular resentment?
40499	Is not this House excluded?
40499	Is not this, as a principle, as novel, as improper, as that which alarms our opponents?
40499	Is not, therefore, eight cents disproportioned to the rates fixed, or intended to be imposed on other articles?
40499	Is that nation more debased than others?
40499	Is the House to be told that, for the sake of harmony, they must give up their own powers and opinions?
40499	Is the House to consider the present, or the expected population?
40499	Is the Treaty- making power not a power vested by the constitution in the Government of the United States, or in a department or officer thereof?
40499	Is the confidence of the people in the services, and patriotism, and wisdom of the Chief Magistrate diminished?
40499	Is the power of establishing an incorporated bank among the powers vested by the constitution in the Legislature of the United States?
40499	Is the zeal of gentlemen, who oppose this design, influenced by their despair of removing the seat of Government afterwards?
40499	Is the_ habeas corpus_ act, or the statute_ De Tallagio non concedendo_ incorporated in_ magna charta_?
40499	Is there a common centre?
40499	Is there a man who does not believe that, had the treaty not been ratified, we should have had war?
40499	Is there a reciprocal stipulation by Great Britain with respect to the articles unexecuted by her?
40499	Is there another point of law and justice for the Government?
40499	Is there any difference in effect between lodging general powers in a government, and permitting the exercise of them by subtle constructions?
40499	Is there any fair construction by which the bill can be deemed an exercise of the power to borrow money?
40499	Is there any impropriety in desiring them to consider a question which they have not yet decided?
40499	Is there any impropriety in paying this mark of respect to a man to whom all America owes such indelible obligations?
40499	Is there any other head proposed to be on the coin but the President''s?
40499	Is there any thing improper or unwise in this determination?
40499	Is there any thing wrong in this?
40499	Is there any time when the civil list will cease its demand?
40499	Is there not more responsibility in one man than in large bodies?
40499	Is this House to negotiate the Treaty over again?
40499	Is this bill to borrow money?
40499	Is this exciting mobs?
40499	Is this fair?
40499	Is this gratitude or insult?
40499	Is this language to be used within the United States?
40499	Is this pursuing a liberal system of politics?
40499	Is this right, is this just, that all our rights should be thus bartered away under a Treaty- making power?
40499	Is this so?
40499	Is this the peace gentlemen undertake, with such fearless confidence, to maintain?
40499	Is this to be the style of an American Congress?
40499	Is this, he asked, consonant to the feelings of the House, and shall they not attempt to counteract its effects in the only constitutional manner?
40499	It does not call for any thing to be done, then why a reference?
40499	It had been asked if the PRESIDENT was responsible for the contents of this Report from the Secretary of War?
40499	It had been asked why the call for information had not been sooner made?
40499	It had been asked, what control the House were to have over this officer?
40499	It has been asked, Is not the Senate as worthy of the confidence of the citizens of the United States as this House?
40499	It has, indeed, been said, it will shorten our sessions; but would this be a benefit?
40499	It is more than probable she will, and if she should, what remedy have we?
40499	It is not for his gratification; for whose, then, are we to do this?
40499	It is only to be inquired, then, whether this was a proper subject of retaliation?
40499	It is said we have not done much, and what we have done is merely our duty, for which we receive wages?
40499	It is the commercial importance of the city of London which makes it the seat of Government; and what is the consequence?
40499	It is true, we may live for two dollars a day; but how?
40499	It may be a future question, also, whether he is to be dismissed when the galleries are cleared?
40499	It was a payment of our_ bona fide_ debts; what could we do?
40499	It was acknowledged by every gentleman that the Treaty of 1783 was broken by the United States; and, if so, what could their negotiator do?
40499	It was asked if the Treaty power could receive any check?
40499	It was asked, by what means is the Government to administer redress?
40499	It was asked, what would be the consequence of refusing to carry the Treaty into effect?
40499	It was enough to fix the general principles, viz: Whether there shall be a General Land Officer and two subordinates?
40499	It was nothing more or less than, would they or would they not now appropriate moneys to carry the British Treaty into effect?
40499	It was true, that a proposition for postponement was made, but what was the extent of that postponement?
40499	JACKSON.--Do not gentlemen think there is some danger on the other side?
40499	Lastly, did it authorize an extensive increase of the Sinking Fund, which we are informed is one of the principal objects?
40499	Let me ask gentlemen, if they, or any of their connections, would accept an appointment under this law, with such an exceptionable clause in it?
40499	Let me ask, why there is for ever so much complaint against Great Britain because she does not open all her colonies freely to us?
40499	Let us pause for a moment, and ask, Was this possible?
40499	Let us, then, inquire, is the constituting a public bank necessary to these important and essential ends of Government?
40499	Lewis.--Then it was, he said, that if it was not convenient for Mr. MURRAY to be concerned in a share in land, he might have it in money?
40499	Little or nothing: how then could he ascertain who was a proper person to legislate or judge of the laws?
40499	Look at the constitution of Great Britain; is that all contained in one instrument?
40499	MADISON?)
40499	Major Torrey died in September, 1783; shall this body decide against the settled rule of all the law courts?
40499	Many exertions had he to make to feed the hungry and cover the naked; were not these for the public good, and shall his private property suffer?
40499	May no other place be proposed?
40499	May not Congress with equal propriety, undertake to regulate the tobacco, the rice, and indigo trade, as well as that of the fisheries?
40499	May we promise ourselves more success in negotiation by laying down our arms, or by retaining them?
40499	Might they not say that they were betwixt nations what bargains were betwixt individuals?
40499	Mr. AMES then asked, whether it was not competent to put the previous question, viz: Shall this call be now taken?
40499	Mr. BALDWIN asked if the Government of the United States of America was four or five times worse to be administered than the Governments in Europe?
40499	Mr. BENSON wished the committee to consider what he judged to be a previous question, namely, how many departments there should be established?
40499	Mr. BOUDINOT asked what assurance we have that Britain will not play the same game over again that she has done already?
40499	Mr. CLARK would be very glad to hear the gentleman from Pennsylvania( Mr. FINDLAY) specify, upon what subject he was willing to pay a tax?
40499	Mr. DAYTON rose and asked,"Who shall decide, when doctors disagree?"
40499	Mr. DEXTER interrupted Mr. HARTLEY to inquire whether, by the laws of this State, the property of an insurgent is forfeited for his crime?
40499	Mr. GERRY observed, that some gentleman had said the Speaker is not an officer; but if he is not an officer, what is he?
40499	Mr. GILES said this subject had struck him in two points of view: whether Congress are not precluded from exercising any discretion on the subject?
40499	Mr. GOODHUE wished to ask Mr. CLAIBORNE one question,"Whether he found himself growing rich?"
40499	Mr. JACKSON said, in reply to the inquiry of Mr. SEDGWICK--"Why have we made a difference between the President and the Vice President?"
40499	Mr. LAWRENCE would inquire for what purpose the cession, mentioned in the constitution, was required?
40499	Mr. LIVINGSTON then proposed a question, Whether any of the shares had been left unappropriated by your associates and you?
40499	Mr. MADISON asked if the quantity of rum so exported was very considerable?
40499	Mr. NICHOLAS inquired if there was any law on this head?
40499	Mr. PARKER wanted to know what was the object of gentlemen in the appointment of a Committee of Conference?
40499	Mr. S. asked him, whether in the Senate?
40499	Mr. S. asked, what, then, were they?
40499	Mr. SMITH was asked whether the offer was that they were to be granted at an inferior rate?
40499	Mr. STONE asked the gentleman last up, how he meant to have the amendments incorporated?
40499	Mr. T. said, this is all the length which we mean to go, and can any body object to this?
40499	Mr. Tilghman asked what Mr. MURRAY expressed to Randall when it was proposed to him to engage in the land scheme?
40499	Mr. Tilghman asked, whether Mr. MURRAY did not, to get the man''s whole secret from him, go beyond his views to draw him on?
40499	Mr. Tilghman then, through the SPEAKER, asked Mr. MURRAY whether he understood he was to pay for his share of land as the other associates or not?
40499	Mr. W. SMITH then asked Randall, whether it was not true, that he spoke to Mr. SAMUEL SMITH before he spoke to himself?
40499	Mr. W. asked, was this not done?
40499	Mr. WHITNEY was next asked at what time he would be ready to proceed with his defence?
40499	Must every transaction that took place, during the course of the last war, be ripped up?
40499	Must they pay their expenses too?
40499	My colleague says that he is not a man of fortune; but, has he not a profession by which he can make more than by his attendance on this House?
40499	Need I say that we fly in the face of that resolution when we pretend that the acts of that power are not valid until we have concurred in them?
40499	Negroes, it was said, would not fight; but he would ask whether it was owing to their being black or to their being slaves?
40499	Ninety thousand dollars was all the money at stake; but what has since been seen?
40499	No, sir; and is it in the contemplation of gentlemen to lay duties so high as to produce this equality?
40499	No; but we solicited, and pay dear for that passage; or did we go to the King of Spain, and demand a free navigation of the Mississippi?
40499	Now he would be glad to know if the distilleries and fisheries would not be precisely in the same situation, let which would take place?
40499	Now will you urge in argument for taxing the poor, that they already practise that temperance which you desire to bring universally about?
40499	Now, I ask gentlemen, whether the professed design of those duties was to raise a revenue, or to prevent the importation of those articles?
40499	Now, he wished to know, what principle of justice authorized the committee to lay a duty of six cents on molasses?
40499	Now, he would ask, if gentlemen could expect that the northern people would incline to go so far south?
40499	Now, if these people were to petition Congress to pass a law prohibiting matrimony, would gentlemen agree to refer such a petition?
40499	Now, in this case, what would you do?
40499	Now, is it intended to determine a centre from these three centres?
40499	Now, said he, do we think of refusing this privilege to all heretics in respect to political doctrines?
40499	Now, what is meant by reporting plans?
40499	Now, what more than this is required by the clause?
40499	Now, will any Government take such measures in gathering in its harvest, as to ruin the soil?
40499	Of individuals?
40499	Of the Treasury Department, too, which is considered in other countries as possessing and exercising the means of corruption?
40499	Of what use, then, was it to establish principles which could not govern the conduct of the House?
40499	Of what?
40499	On a division, shall the committee now rise?
40499	On motion for the previous question, to wit: Shall the question be now put on the following preliminary resolutions?
40499	On the first of June, the British were to give up the Western posts; if money was not appropriated, would they not be deceived?
40499	On the other hand, were not a Greene and a Mifflin furnished from the Society of the Quakers?
40499	On the other hand, whether it was not the most effectual mean of preserving his popularity, and of keeping him in office?
40499	On their Representatives?
40499	On what ground could this assumption have been made?
40499	On what principle can this distinction then be contended for?
40499	On what principle did he accept it?
40499	On what then do the people depend for checking encroachments, or preventing abuses?
40499	Once, however, he did see him; the first question of Mr. SEDGWICK was, from what State did he come?
40499	Or does it speak the same language now, as it did at the time it was obtained?
40499	Or does the Legislature establish them for the convenience of an individual?
40499	Or how can they say it is more expensive to establish it in this way than in another?
40499	Or is it wise to stand by and depend upon such a resource?
40499	Or is the Speaker to write them a letter, or the Sergeant- at- Arms with the mace to wait on them?
40499	Or rather, as my colleague has proposed, if they are incapable to pay both, will they not prefer a composition?
40499	Or shall we send across the sea for loans?
40499	Or shall we, by a candid and liberal construction of the powers expressed in the constitution, promote the great and important objects thereof?
40499	Or should we drive all printers from us who take notes, for the inaccuracies of some?
40499	Or the ruin of thousands and thousands by our delays of payment, and the consequent depreciation of our securities?
40499	Or was it true, that this power was competent to treat with every government on earth but that of Great Britain?
40499	Or was there any use for it but that the sentiments of every member might be known?
40499	Or where is the justice of doing more for the assignee than he, or his assignor, expected could or would be done?
40499	Or whether it restrained the States from exercising that power?
40499	Or whether there was any authority given to the Union, with which the exercise of this right by any State would be inconsistent?
40499	Or, if his life should not be invaded, what would its enjoyments be in a country odious to the eyes of strangers and dishonored in his own?
40499	Or, will the Government of the United States support the claim of the injured against her own Executive?
40499	Or, will you say that Congress might issue paper money?
40499	Ought they, from their remoteness, to be kept in the dark, or to be furnished with such light as would only mislead?
40499	Ought we to have at once acceded to hers?
40499	Our understandings have been addressed, it is true, and with ability and effect; but, I demand, has any corner of the heart been left unexplored?
40499	Perhaps I may be asked, Did not the States depend chiefly upon their own exertion for the defence of the frontiers under the old Congress?
40499	Pray, let me ask, if Great Britain have not equally tied their hands?
40499	Pray, would it not be a proper bar to the recovery of damages in a court of law to say Government has paid you?
40499	Provisions had been made by this House to carry Indian Treaties into effect; but why?
40499	SCOTT.--Has not this Government a right to restrain every wild- goose excursion into the woods?
40499	SEDGWICK.--Has it not been said that there was a party in the United States, not only for aristocracy, but even for monarchy?
40499	SWIFT) that, by paying these claims in the first instance, you are cutting the sinews of civil process?
40499	Shall a Treaty repeal a law or a law a Treaty?
40499	Shall his family be reduced to beggary, be stripped of their all, to discharge what the United States are in honor and in justice bound to pay?
40499	Shall it be said, that the House have a discretion as to appropriations, and yet they must make them as directed by a Treaty?
40499	Shall the House take no further measures on the subject, and receive the answer of the PRESIDENT as obligatory with regard to the question?
40499	Shall the Senate, because they may think it in one case trifling, or conceive the power ought to be placed in them, assume it?
40499	Shall the United States stipulate solemnly to guarantee the new boundary which may be arranged?
40499	Shall they not declare their own and their constituents''confidence undiminished in that officer of the Government?
40499	Shall they take the Lake of the Woods on one side, and the Missouri on the other, and find a geographical centre?
40499	Shall we hazard an entire loss of this revenue?
40499	Shall we intrust the conduct of that matter to the very persons who it has been alleged are often the aggressors?
40499	Shall we leave it to the fisherman, to be determined by his oath?
40499	Shall we make it an excuse for refusing to pass this vote, that we establish the principle of thanking nobody?
40499	Shall we never have done with the settlement and liquidation of our accounts?
40499	Shall we not let them see the end of their burthen in the law itself?
40499	Shall we put our hands into the pockets of our constituents, and appropriate moneys for uses we are undetermined of?
40499	Shall we say that man ought to have been made otherwise?
40499	Shall we say that the evidence carries on its face fraud and deception?
40499	Shall we sit still and bear it?
40499	Shall we then give up to a body, who has already a superiority over us, those superior powers which we possess relative to revenue?
40499	Shall we then proceed without them?
40499	Shall we then restrain a man from having an agency in the disposal of his own money?
40499	Shall we, dreading to become the blind instruments of power, yield ourselves the blinder dupes of mere sounds of imposture?
40499	Should Government, said Mr. V., come forward and show their imbecility by censuring what we can not punish?
40499	Should any thing be done at this time in the way of commercial regulations towards vindicating and advancing our national interests?
40499	Should that credit be destroyed( he asked) by destroying the confidence of foreigners in our faith?
40499	Should these fifty dollars fall to the Government, or to me?
40499	Should they then pass the law in such a manner as almost to warrant the people in resisting it?
40499	Should this bill pass, what can it be denominated but a delusion, a deception, sanctioned by Congress itself?
40499	Should those of our citizens who furnished the supplies, or loaned their money, be the only class who are injured?
40499	Since the bounty is to cease by this bill, what advantage in striking it out?
40499	Sir, did we fight for this?
40499	Suppose a person in office, not possessing the talents he was judged to have at the time of the appointment, is the error not to be corrected?
40499	Suppose he dislikes them, and will not have them, he is guilty of a breach of the law, is it intended by the House to impeach him for it?
40499	Suppose he refuses, will his vote be the less valid, or the community be disengaged from that obedience which is due to the laws of the Union?
40499	Suppose that all the Indians were driven over the Mississippi to- morrow, to whom would the lands which they now possess belong?
40499	Suppose that authority were in this way to grant millions upon millions, must the House, at all events, be compelled to provide for their payment?
40499	Suppose that, on the arrival of the definitive treaty, Congress had not agreed to the terms, would the war have then been considered as at an end?
40499	Suppose the revenue should fall short of his estimate, is he responsible for the balance?
40499	Suppose they instruct a representative, by his vote, to violate the constitution; is he at liberty to obey such instructions?
40499	Suppose, however, that it were omitted, and our country invaded, would a decision in Congress against raising armies be safer than the affirmative?
40499	Suppose, then, a vessel of thirty tons obtains, in a season, six hundred quintals of fish?
40499	Surely the substance ought not to pay at this rate-- then what good reason can be offered for the measure?
40499	Take all these together, is it not to be doubted that twelve hundred and fifty- six dollars will remain of the forty- four thousand in the Treasury?
40499	That gentleman wished to know to what point this information was to apply?
40499	That is not the question; but whether, organized as we are, under the constitution, we have a right to make such a grant?
40499	That it has been contrived with a view to lead them on by degrees to that kind of government which they have thrown off with abhorrence?
40499	The British Parliament has now no pay; but have they been as independent as their countrymen wished them under the British Government?
40499	The British had gone past them, and what was to hinder the Algerines, or such a man as Mr. Cooper, from getting past them?
40499	The French wished to be paid here, and it being no loss, but rather a profit, to comply with their wish, where was the harm in so doing?
40499	The House asked a question; the PRESIDENT answered in the negative-- for what purpose refer the answer?
40499	The House divided on the question,"Shall the delegate take an oath as a member?"
40499	The PRESIDENT asserts it; in the Address reported, the Senate assent; a motion is made to strike out; is it because the truth of it is doubted?
40499	The Romans and Greeks had slaves, and are not their glorious achievements held up as excitements to great and magnanimous actions?
40499	The SPEAKER asked what time he wanted?
40499	The SPEAKER then interrogated the prisoner, whether these charges were true or false?
40499	The SPEAKER then said, Is this the prisoner?
40499	The Treaty makes war indispensable, as the only redress of injuries, and how will war from the United States reach Great Britain?
40499	The United States owe the value they received, which they acknowledge, and which they have promised to pay: what is that value?
40499	The bill says it shall cease; and have gentlemen any objection to the bounty''s ceasing?
40499	The bill was then read the third time; and on the question, Shall the bill pass?
40499	The call for the question being now very general, it was put, shall the words"to be removable by the President,"be struck out?
40499	The debt is the price of our liberties, and can not be diminished a farthing, the gentleman from Virginia says; and why?
40499	The first of these was, whether the Algerines acted from their own impulse in this matter?
40499	The first question is, how much does Government receive by the duty on the salt used in curing the fish which is exported?
40499	The first question then was, is Congress vested with a power to grant the privileges contained in the bill?
40499	The first questions that offer themselves, are: Was the money in question appropriated to special and distinct purposes?
40499	The gentleman from Connecticut wished to know why he had brought this resolution before the House?
40499	The gentleman from New Hampshire asked, what do the PRESIDENT and two- thirds of the Senate operate upon?
40499	The gentleman says further, that the people have the right of instructing their representatives; if so, why not declare it?
40499	The government of that territory is a corporation; and who will deny that Congress may lawfully establish a bank beyond the Ohio?
40499	The grand question now is, did the State, by acceding to the confederation, give up her right of legislation?
40499	The law is to supply the necessary means of executing the principle laid down; for how can it be carried into effect in any other manner?
40499	The member asked, if the House were to close their understandings, and refuse all information from that quarter?
40499	The merit of the amendment depends on its adaptedness to the end proposed by the bill, and what is that?
40499	The next inquiry is, what rights will this company enjoy in this new character, that they do not enjoy independent of it?
40499	The next question is, to what amount the public are at present indebted?
40499	The only constant agents in political affairs are the passions of men-- shall we complain of our nature?
40499	The only question now is, whether this be a direct bounty, or simply a commutation of the allowance already granted by Congress?
40499	The only question, therefore, which appears to be before the committee is, whether we shall give this power to the President alone?
40499	The point to be settled is whether it shall be done by an oral communication, or transmitted in writing?
40499	The previous question being insisted upon, was put--"Shall the main question be now put?"
40499	The previous question thereon was called for by five members, to wit:"Shall the main question, to agree to the said resolution, be now put?"
40499	The previous question was called for by five members, to wit:"Shall the main question, to agree to the said resolution, be now put?"
40499	The previous question was now called for, by five members, viz:"Shall the main question to agree to the said resolution, be now put?"
40499	The previous question was then demanded by five members: Shall the main question be now put?
40499	The previous question,"Shall the main question now be put?"
40499	The principal inquiry is, will the institution facilitate the management of the finances?
40499	The question before the committee was, have the United States taken away any claim which the purchasers of these lands had?
40499	The question is, did he continue in service to the end of the war?
40499	The question is, what shall be the duty on any particular article?
40499	The question now to be determined, he conceived, was this-- is an addition to the present amount of the revenue necessary?
40499	The question then is, by whom?
40499	The question then is, whether the highest sum can be collected?
40499	The question then recurred, what Treaties were made under the authority of the United States?
40499	The question was called for, and put by the Chairman, Shall the committee now rise, and report progress?
40499	The question was taken,"Whether the President of the United States shall be addressed by the title of_ His Excellency_?"
40499	The question was then put by the SPEAKER, Shall the committee have leave to sit again?
40499	The question was then put, Shall the committee now rise and report progress?
40499	The question was then stated, to wit:"Shall the said bill be rejected?"
40499	The question was then taken, do the House agree to the amendment?
40499	The question was whether they were in a situation in which they could claim to be a State?
40499	The question was, had the Secretary violated a law?
40499	The question will only be, what powers has the constitution given, and to what departments have the same been distributed?
40499	The question, then, is reduced to its expediency, whether it is good policy to exercise the power or not?
40499	The remainder, viz:"If not, shall a temporary boundary be marked, making the Oconee the line, and the other parts of the treaty be concluded?"
40499	The right of Congress to regulate trade is adduced as an argument in favor of this of creating a corporation; but what has this bill to do with trade?
40499	The second, what the sum is that is proper for the article we select?
40499	Their present inexperience will soon be done away by a proper mode of discipline, and why may not these troops be soon instructed?
40499	Then they deemed war nearly inevitable, and would not this adjustment have been considered at that day as a happy escape from the calamity?
40499	Then was it proper, he asked, that the Executive should be requested to make a second answer, and nearly in the same words?
40499	Then why all this abuse of this particular sect, without discrimination?
40499	Then why disturb the tranquillity of the people?
40499	Then why not, for the sake of conciliation, grant it?
40499	Then why should the poor of Massachusetts be taxed for the beverage they use of spruce, molasses and water?
40499	Then you are bound, by this precedent, to indemnify him; and how can you distinguish what was the real motive to that outrage?
40499	There appeared to him only two things as necessary to be inquired into: First, Was the new Government Republican?
40499	There is a river, it is said, which runs two hundred miles into the country as far as the Allegany mountains; what advantage can this be to Congress?
40499	There is no doubt, sir, but it will; but does this tend to show that the constituent has no right to instruct?
40499	There is to be but one head; but does not our Government consist of three parts?
40499	Therefore, why involve in this indiscriminate censure men who have deserved so well of their country?
40499	These are the commercial acquisitions we have obtained by the Treaty; and let me ask, what have we given to Britain in return for them?
40499	They must come in ballast: and will the mere transportation of our crop be a sufficient inducement to engage them to come here?
40499	They, indeed, afford an exception to the cases above mentioned; but how far were they successful?
40499	This being the fact, he inquired, what could be done with the Southern produce, in case of the exclusion of foreign bottoms?
40499	This was a pleasing situation; but what was the situation of the British debtors?
40499	This was true, he believed; but how would it apply in the sense the gentleman wished?
40499	To others I will urge, can any circumstance mark upon a people more turpitude and debasement?
40499	To such a nation was it proper to trust a latitude of that extent?
40499	To the first of these I ask, against whom is the suit to commence?
40499	To what purpose then to sound the alarm, and to ring the tocsin from Georgia to New Hampshire?
40499	To what should they compare Treaties?
40499	To what, he asked, would a contrary doctrine lead?
40499	To what?
40499	To whom was the care of our prisoners in Philadelphia committed?
40499	True, it might be asked, why say negroes or other property?
40499	Under all circumstances, should not his estate be indemnified?
40499	Under it money may be borrowed, as well as commerce regulated; and why not money appropriated?
40499	Under these circumstances, do gentlemen contend that an indiscriminate conduct is due to Great Britain and to Holland?
40499	Under these circumstances, what was to be expected but complaints from the people, and a consequent repeal of the bill?
40499	Under those circumstances what could we have done?
40499	Upon what ground, then, do gentlemen stand?
40499	VINING.--Why do gentlemen say that such an office is unnecessary, when they are forced to admit that all the duties are essential?
40499	Was Government to be burdened with them, and derive no compensation?
40499	Was he the author of the Funding System?
40499	Was he the author of the plan for establishing the National Bank?
40499	Was he the author of the report on the fisheries?
40499	Was he to be both judge and executioner in his own case?
40499	Was he to manufacture it himself, or in what way could he better obtain it than from the Heads of the Departments?
40499	Was it a sufficient reason for exempting a district from public burdens to say that the people are poor?
40499	Was it any unusual thing to call for the yeas and nays?
40499	Was it consistent with the warmth which had been discovered, to say that all this discussion, all this length of time, had been consumed upon nothing?
40499	Was it for this the soldier watched his numerous nights, and braved the inclemency of the seasons?
40499	Was it in the opposition to the minority of the Senate and the general voice of the people against the treaty that that_ firmness_ was displayed?
40499	Was it intended to have the constitution republished, and the alterations inserted in their proper places?
40499	Was it not already settled in the constitution and by existing laws?
40499	Was it not better to fill up the old corps, than to put ourselves to the inconvenience of raising a new one?
40499	Was it not necessary for them to consult, and fix upon a proper place?
40499	Was it not the ecclesiastical corporations and perpetual monopolies of England and Scotland?
40499	Was it not then urged by members of that House that the British nation refused to negotiate with them?
40499	Was it not to substantiate the truth of them by a vote?
40499	Was it right that when a man had led our armies to victory, and returned, that he should be immediately stripped of his commission?
40499	Was it they who formed the constitution?
40499	Was it to be wondered at, if this swarm should raise a buzz about him?
40499	Was it to remain as a pledge for the performance of the other?
40499	Was it wantonly to throw away a privilege and natural right?
40499	Was merit, then, to be the less regarded, because it was modest?
40499	Was not peace the most to be desired, especially in our present situation?
40499	Was not the good of the public his principal object?
40499	Was not this representation true, he asked; could it be controverted?
40499	Was not this returning good for evil?
40499	Was not this true of all the great and essential powers of government?
40499	Was one branch to be judges of discretion for another?
40499	Was the Executive to trust the defence of a country to a militia formed under such a law?
40499	Was the Message then alone referred as it is now proposed by some gentlemen?
40499	Was the money, he asked, to have remained in the hands of the banker in Europe?
40499	Was the property less changed by the law of a sovereign and independent State, than by the proclamation of a British commander?
40499	Was there any other country which could give us the same supplies we wanted?
40499	Was there no security against a wanton abuse of these enormous powers?
40499	Was there no security in the watchful guardianship of such a character?
40499	Was this depreciated paper freely accepted?
40499	Was this insinuation pointed at Congress or the Executive?
40499	Was this paper equal in value to gold or silver?
40499	Was this the case?
40499	Was this the object of the reference to the Secretary?
40499	Was this, he asked, an exposition of the meaning of the constitution?
40499	We have no doubt been cruelly treated; but we have made proper application for redress, and received an answer?
40499	We refer, said he, to the wisdom of the Senate; but how is this superior wisdom to be discerned?
40499	Were dollars, he asked, to be balanced by absolute appropriations?
40499	Were not hundreds of Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and almost of every other denomination, among our enemies?
40499	Were not the archives, records, deeds,& c., which had also fallen into the hands of the enemy, their property?
40499	Were not the latter as necessary as the former?
40499	Were our citizens in a state of organization as militia?
40499	Were our magazines and arsenals properly supplied?
40499	Were our ports and harbors in any tolerable state of defence?
40499	Were the Committee of the Whole to turn authors and write a dissertation on part of the constitution?
40499	Were the Senate so chosen?
40499	Were the advocates of this doctrine aware of its consequences, when they advanced it?
40499	Were the citizens of the Northern and Eastern States to dictate to Congress on a measure in which the Southern States were so deeply interested?
40499	Were the people jealous of this House, and not of the other branches?
40499	Were there any petitions on the subject excepting that from the Pennsylvania Society and a few Quakers?
40499	Were they called upon to give an opinion?
40499	Were they to propose such a plan as this to us, would it not be received with indignation?
40499	Were we not bound to take as much care of our own interest, as of that of other people?
40499	Were we to demand satisfaction?
40499	Were women and fatherless children to be regarded as traitors?
40499	What are the emigrant nobility to renounce?
40499	What are the rights of conquest?
40499	What are these powers?
40499	What are they to bring back in return?
40499	What are they to do if they are discharged?
40499	What are you?
40499	What authority has this House to explain the law?
40499	What clause is it that gives this power in express terms?
40499	What could be more immoral than war?
40499	What could he know of the Government the moment he landed?
40499	What could induce this grant?
40499	What denominations formed the thousands of new levies, that endeavored to deluge our country in blood?
40499	What did the House meet for at all?
40499	What did they want to do with it?
40499	What difference, he asked, was there on that occasion and the present, when the French just adopted and organized a new government?
40499	What does it import?
40499	What effect would this doctrine, if admitted, have upon the State governments?
40499	What equivalent do we receive for this sacrifice?
40499	What evidence have we that the demand will stop there?
40499	What good did his renunciation of title do, excepting that it afforded him a short opportunity of deceiving his fellow- citizens?
40499	What good end could have been answered by a war?
40499	What had been our situation ever since the negotiation?
40499	What had been the custom of the House heretofore?
40499	What has been the conduct of Great Britain, in relation to her funds?
40499	What has carried the credit of that kingdom to a superior eminence, but the attention she has paid to public credit?
40499	What has he left her to ask, what has he not surrendered?
40499	What have Congress to do with the acts of States?
40499	What if he refuses to answer at all?
40499	What is a law?
40499	What is now his answer?
40499	What is now our prospect?
40499	What is patriotism?
40499	What is the PRESIDENT and two- thirds of the Senate?
40499	What is the centre of wealth, population, and territory?
40499	What is the charge?
40499	What is the object for which men enter into society, but to secure their lives and property?
40499	What is the object of the address before us?
40499	What is the present case?
40499	What is the present situation of our commerce?
40499	What is the purport of the memorial?
40499	What is the situation of Florence in consequence of this event?
40499	What is the situation of those who are implicated in the causes of the failure?
40499	What is the usual means of acquiring property between man and man?
40499	What is there in the Treaty that could humble us so low?
40499	What is there to discharge the Government from the payment?
40499	What is to be done for compensation?
40499	What is to be done while the impeachment is depending?
40499	What is your name?
40499	What is your usual place of residence?
40499	What justifies these harsh epithets?
40499	What kind of a business would this be?
40499	What kind of reasoning was this, or how did the gentleman propose to reconcile it?
40499	What man is there here that can be wicked enough to involve his country in such incalculable miseries?
40499	What may Great Britain expect, if we will not settle our differences by negotiation?
40499	What may be the consequence of binding a man to vote in all cases according to the will of others?
40499	What may we expect will be the conduct of our own citizens?
40499	What must have passed, he asked, between the soldier, the militiaman, or farmer, and the purchaser?
40499	What occasion, then, can there be for them?
40499	What reason could be adduced for acting?
40499	What reason could the purchaser assign for offering £10 for a paper which specified an obligation to pay £100?
40499	What reason is there for any such supposition?
40499	What right had the House to say to a particular class of people, you shall not have that kind of property which other people have?
40499	What security can there be for a commerce thus precariously conducted, in which your rivals are your judge?
40499	What then are we called upon to do?
40499	What then is the officer to be responsible for, which should induce the House to vest in him such extraordinary powers?
40499	What then remains of your constitution, except its mode of organization?
40499	What then should we have done?
40499	What then will be the case?
40499	What was it drove our forefathers to this country?
40499	What was the allegiance, as a citizen of South Carolina, he owed to the King of Great Britain?
40499	What was the case in the present instance?
40499	What was the conduct of gentlemen?
40499	What was the conduct of this society when the first news of the late insurrection reached them?
40499	What was the effect of the embargo in 1794?
40499	What was the event?
40499	What was the present measure?
40499	What was the representation to do?
40499	What was the situation of the people of America, when the dissolution of their allegiance took place by the declaration of independence?
40499	What was their interest, then?
40499	What was this consideration?
40499	What weapons have we which can reach her?
40499	What were the powers and privileges of the House on the subject?
40499	What were the steps then taken in that parallel case?
40499	What will the assignee lose by the measure?
40499	What will their constituents think of them?
40499	What will this comprehend, or, rather, what will it not comprehend?
40499	What would be the consequence, said Mr. B., of refusing at this time, and under these circumstances, to receive this State into the Union?
40499	What would be the effect of a contrary doctrine?
40499	What would be the effect of such an act of Parliament?
40499	What would follow from this?
40499	What( he asked) was their situation, and what had they to fear in case of an open rupture with Great Britain?
40499	What, he asked, could be the end of all these things but war?
40499	What, he asked, were these?
40499	What, he further asked, would become of our produce, in the event contemplated?
40499	What, let me inquire, will be the pernicious consequences resulting from the establishment of this doctrine?
40499	What, said he, are we about to do?
40499	What, said he, is its object?
40499	What, said he, would be the consequence of such construction?
40499	What, sir, is the intention of this business?
40499	What, then, becomes of its strength?
40499	What, then, permit me to inquire, can the power of treating effect?
40499	When Britain has been at the trouble of stipulating a peace for Portugal, will she suffer that nation to assist us?
40499	When a million of dollars had been expended, were the House to give them fifteen or twenty thousand dollars more?
40499	When an exasperated militia went out, what were we to expect, but that the first man with a red skin whom they met would be shot?
40499	When did their citizenship commence?
40499	When it was laid before them, it was then contended that the House had a right to interfere in the Treaty, or why ask for it?
40499	When you first cut a man''s throat, and thereafter call him a rascal, do you suppose that your accusation will affect the man''s reputation?
40499	Whence arises, then, the opposition?
40499	Where are they to be formed?
40499	Where could be the pretence for any thing of this sort?
40499	Where did these gentlemen find that definition of treason?
40499	Where does the conciliating temper of Great Britain manifest itself?
40499	Where has that power been placed?
40499	Where is it?
40499	Where is that will to be found?
40499	Where is the breach of faith in Government, if it paid its whole debt with justice, blended with mercy?
40499	Where is the denomination amongst us, that did not furnish opposers to our glorious Revolution?
40499	Where is the difference between this case and that of indemnifying the losses at sea by the British?
40499	Where is the justice of doing more for the assignee than he or his assignor expected could or would be done?
40499	Where is the man among us who has the presumption and vanity to expect it?
40499	Where is the propriety of branding a measure of this nature with epithets of infamy?
40499	Where must they look in the United States for the sovereign power?
40499	Where should they find that power in Great Britain?
40499	Where then is it to be found?
40499	Where then?
40499	Where was the money to come from?
40499	Where were the benefits of peace, if they were still to keep up our War Establishments?
40499	Where, he asked, is the proof of this allegation?
40499	Where, then, are the real profits anticipated?
40499	Where, then, is the danger of expressing a general approbation?
40499	Wherefore was it provided that no duty should be laid on exports?
40499	Whether a like conciliatory conduct has not been observed by the advocates of manufactures?
40499	Whether it was to be a fleeting vision, or to continue for ages?
40499	Whether the public opinion was four or five times more unfavorable to such an administration?
40499	Whether they shall be under the direction of Commissioners?
40499	Which of these alternatives have they elected to do?
40499	While the British had acted with so much liberality, did it become Americans to stick at the paltry sum of seventeen thousand dollars?
40499	Who are benefited by the revolution?
40499	Who are those that say to us, Germantown is the most proper spot that can be selected?
40499	Who constituted this class of citizens?
40499	Who did not believe that such an event was not only possible, but in some degree probable?
40499	Who fought the battles of Georgia, under Clark and Twiggs?
40499	Who fought the battles of New Jersey?
40499	Who fought the battles of South Carolina, under the command of an honorable member now present?
40499	Who had been the cause of the posts being so long kept from the United States?
40499	Who had the most produce to sell?
40499	Who has firmness enough to meet so foul a deed?
40499	Who has not heard of the rebellion of_ Shays_, where a great deal of property was destroyed?
40499	Who have fought the Indians so often with success, under Generals Wilkinson, Scott, Sevier, and others?
40499	Who marched in 1776 under General Rutherford, through the Cherokee nation, laid waste their country, and forced them to peace?
40499	Who shall declare what is the law, when the learned gentlemen of the bar are so directly opposed to each other?
40499	Who suffers by this use of our authority?
40499	Who were the purchasers?
40499	Who were to be the losers, under these circumstances?
40499	Who will accuse me of wandering out of the subject?
40499	Who will hereafter admit an excise officer into his house, if that house may, with impunity, be burned about his ears?
40499	Who will say that I exaggerate the tendencies of our measures?
40499	Who will suffer most?
40499	Who will trace these inferences, and pretend that we may have no share, according to the argument, in the Treaty- making power?
40499	Who, under mere motives of friendship, would have done so?
40499	Why a reference?
40499	Why all this particular deviation from the common line of business to pass random votes of censure?
40499	Why are they called upon to say, yea or nay, if they are obliged to say yea?
40499	Why borrow money?
40499	Why did the United States contract with the State, if she had no right?
40499	Why did they not leave that, which they call God''s work, to be managed by himself?
40499	Why do n''t you indemnify British depredations out of the British property that is within your grasp?"
40499	Why is it necessary to fix upon Philadelphia for ten years?
40499	Why is this penalty imposed on the United States?
40499	Why lay a duty on foreign nails, when they can not rival you if you make them as good and as cheap?
40499	Why leave a phantom of discretion, an unreal mockery of power, in the hands of the Legislature?
40499	Why leave it only to be implied?
40499	Why not also fix the principles of Government?
40499	Why not choose the Speaker of this House?
40499	Why not come forward, and demand of us the power of Legislation, and say, give us up your privileges, and we will govern you?
40499	Why not protect this property as well?
40499	Why not tell them at once, and in plain English, you must renounce your titles before you can have the privileges of an American citizen?
40499	Why not?
40499	Why shall we liquidate a debt which is established upon a complete and final settlement?
40499	Why should a man take a dangerous and a doubtful path, when a safe one presents itself?
40499	Why should we interfere with the concerns of our sister States who have not yet joined the new Government?
40499	Why so little jealousy of the Executive Department, separated by the constitution with so much care from us?
40499	Why so?
40499	Why then provide for it a second time?
40499	Why then should we interfere in the business?
40499	Why this harsh language?
40499	Why use so hackneyed a word?
40499	Why was the call delayed till the session was within a few weeks of its termination?
40499	Why was the subject mentioned?
40499	Why were the resolutions brought before the House?
40499	Why were these rights ever maintained and so scrupulously attended to by the people of those countries?
40499	Why were we afraid to intrust the PRESIDENT with the power of raising ten thousand men?
40499	Why were you so long in presenting your petition?
40499	Why will these people, then, make use of arguments to induce the slave to turn his hand against his master?
40499	Why, especially, he asked, should they give rise to invidious comparisons between themselves and the other branch?
40499	Why, let me ask gentlemen, shall we commit an infraction of the constitution for fear the Senate or President should not comply with its directions?
40499	Why, only that this was his opinion; but is that authority here?
40499	Why, said Mr. L., communicate the instructions to the Ministers?
40499	Why, said Mr. S., will not the Eastern members indulge us in this trifle?
40499	Why, then fix the price as if the whole Army was to be kept there?
40499	Why, then, are we called upon to propose amendments subversive of the principles of the constitution, which were never desired?
40499	Why, then, call for them?
40499	Why, then, did he suffer the bill to pass the committee in silence?
40499	Why, then, embarrass themselves by making a larger appropriation than was necessary?
40499	Why, then, expend so much precious time unnecessarily?
40499	Why, then, hazard words that infer it?
40499	Why, then, is a period of ten years to expire, previous to going there?
40499	Why, then, make this rant about the British?
40499	Why, then, shall we be told that the negative is the safe side?
40499	Why, then, should such particular attention be paid to them, for bringing forward a business of questionable policy?
40499	Why, then, should the House search for a meaning, to make the constitution inconsistent with itself, when a more rational one is at hand?
40499	Why, then, will gentlemen advocate a doctrine so obnoxious to the principles of the constitution, when a more favorable construction is at hand?
40499	Why, therefore, all this extraneous argument about a point of so easy decision?
40499	Why_ firmness_?
40499	Will Virginia set all her negroes free?
40499	Will a duty of ten dollars diminish the importation?
40499	Will any one answer by a sneer, that all this is idle preaching?
40499	Will any one deny that we are bound-- and I would hope to good purpose-- by the most solemn sanctions of duty for the vote we give?
40499	Will gentlemen say it is"We the people"in this case?
40499	Will gentlemen then say, that to gratify a thoughtless regard for economy, they will risk the most invaluable part of the Government?
40499	Will gentlemen, said he, blast this prospect by rejecting the bill?
40499	Will gentlemen, then, comply with the one, and neglect the other?
40499	Will he live in a more expensive style than the former Presidents of Congress, or will he live nearly in the same?
40499	Will he not feel some dread that a change of system will reverse the scene?
40499	Will he submit, after having gained his point at the expense of property and the loss of constitution, to have those sentiments established?
40499	Will it be said that we are unable to do it?
40499	Will it be whispered that the Treaty has made me a new champion for the protection of the frontiers?
40499	Will it materially affect the price of rice or tobacco?
40499	Will it not alarm our fellow- citizens?
40499	Will it not be subversive of every principle on which public contracts are founded?
40499	Will it not give them just cause of alarm?
40499	Will it not have probably a contrary effect, and be the means of increasing the evil tenfold more than it exists at present?
40499	Will it restore value to the evidences of that debt held by our creditors?
40499	Will not gentlemen weigh well that vote, that may possibly increase the number of mourning widows and helpless orphans?
40499	Will not precluding them look like a wish to smother all further inquiry into the matter?
40499	Will not the administration of public affairs be conducted in future by representatives as good as ourselves?
40499	Will not their traders continue their old acquaintanceship with them in spite of us?
40499	Will not these people who suffered by the Tories in the last war come next, with open mouths, and demand indemnity?
40499	Will she make her countervail oppressive and unjust?
40499	Will she not expect that we shall resort to more violent measures-- such as reprisal, sequestration, or stopping of intercourse?
40499	Will such a scheme increase it?
40499	Will the Senate refuse to make an acknowledgment of that kind?
40499	Will the strength and riches of the country be to the north or to the south of the Susquehanna?
40499	Will the tendency to Indian hostilities be contrasted by any one?
40499	Will the treatment be better than usual?
40499	Will they be reported in such a form even?
40499	Will they contribute any thing by consuming imported spirits?
40499	Will they do it against the State of North Carolina?
40499	Will they expose themselves to be preyed upon by these men?
40499	Will they give up the money they cost them, and to whom?
40499	Will they have less wisdom or virtue, to discover and pursue the good of their fellow- citizens than we have?
40499	Will they make the representation of the several States the rule by which it shall be apportioned?
40499	Will they not have to pay taxes from the time they settle amongst us?
40499	Will they not say, that they have been deceived by the convention that framed the constitution?
40499	Will they rack- rent their tenants in such a manner as to deprive them of the means of improving the estate?
40499	Will they refuse to sell us their manufactures?
40499	Will they submit to an excise?
40499	Will they tamely submit to be robbed of their property, when they lose all hope of aid or protection from the Government?
40499	Will this prevent an increase of the public debt?
40499	Will this reconcile the minds of our people to the General Government?
40499	Will you adopt a charge against him, which is in its nature an imputation that however lightly and wickedly made, will implicate perhaps innocent men?
40499	Will you gain by this contest?
40499	Will you restrain him from having access to the members out of doors?
40499	Will you return to every other person exporting dutied goods the money he has paid, and will you refuse the poor fisherman?
40499	Will you shelter yourself under the plea of necessity?
40499	Will you then raise a force to drive them off?
40499	Will you, he observed, permit, nay, invite him, whom you arraign at the bar of this House, to be a public accuser?
40499	With respect to the more absolute government of France, where has this power been lodged?
40499	With what degree of consistency can the House be called on for a vote if, as some members contend, they can not have an opinion?
40499	Woodfall, a celebrated printer, took down debates from memory: could we prevent this being done here?
40499	Work for a living?
40499	Would Congress have had the power to naturalize, if it had not been expressly given?
40499	Would any body say that French liberty was better secured by naming a harbor_ Havre de Marat_?
40499	Would any jury in this country say, that the matter of fact and the principles of law were not in favor of the petition?
40499	Would any legislature endeavor to introduce into a former act a subsequent amendment, and let them stand so connected?
40499	Would any man call this a communication from the Executive?
40499	Would any man risk the feelings and character of his friend by an attempt to force a vote of thanks by a bare majority through the House?
40499	Would any man say that the sole object of self- created societies has been the publication of political doctrines?
40499	Would any one doubt that Congress may lend money, that they may buy their debt in the market, or redeem their captives from Algiers?
40499	Would any plain man suppose that this bill had any thing to do with trade?
40499	Would arguments of this kind satisfy our constituents, if they should find themselves suddenly plunged into an expensive and ruinous war?
40499	Would even the citizens of the other States, which did not possess this property, desire to have all the slaves let loose upon them?
40499	Would gentlemen narrow the operation of the constitution in this manner, and render it impossible to be executed?
40499	Would he have pledged his honor, his reputation, had he been interested?
40499	Would he not, though absent, have acquired, according to the petitioner''s own positions, a right of citizenship?
40499	Would it add to his fame to be called after the petty and insignificant princes of Europe?
40499	Would it be proper to give an approbation that can not be appropriate, and that has no definite meaning?
40499	Would it be prudent to trust a foreigner, perhaps a rival, if not an enemy, with your supply of what has emphatically been called the sinews of war?
40499	Would it have been best to have traded with them upon sufferance, and so to have maintained a precarious kind of commerce?
40499	Would it not expose us to exorbitant demands, and often a refusal?
40499	Would not Congress have been in the same situation as before the signing of the provisional articles?
40499	Would not a Treaty made under it be clearly the law of England?
40499	Would not such a step be injurious even to the slaves themselves?
40499	Would not the end of impeachment be defeated by this means?
40499	Would not the measures have been reprobated with one voice, and the Treaty considered as a nullity?
40499	Would our foreign creditors believe we were scrupulously fulfilling our engagements with them?
40499	Would styling him His Serene Highness, His Grace, or Mightiness, add one tittle to the solid properties he possessed?
40499	Would the citizens of that country tamely suffer their property to be torn from them?
40499	Would the makers of shoes be content to go there and retail them?
40499	Would they not say, a vote of thanks has been rejected?
40499	Would twelve of this House, or would any jury in the country say that the war continued longer than hostilities?
40499	Yes, said he, we have still a constitution, but where is it to be found?
40499	Yet are they not thought to be justified by national policy?
40499	You declare yourself not guilty?
40499	_ Executive Departments._--Resolution respecting, 85; debate thereon, 85; how many departments shall be established?
40499	_ Treasury Department._--Debate, 90; shall this important department be in the hands of a single officer or in a Board of Commissioners?
40499	_ ad valorem_, paid, as it were, in an exclusive manner, by the State of Massachusetts, be equal?
40499	a pretence to cover their ambition?
40499	and did we assure ourselves of the full execution of the law?
40499	and if we make them such grants every year, do we not in fact become tributary to them?
40499	and that the hope of the justice we now ask for has delayed the sale of all the rest, to satisfy his creditors-- his Southern creditors?
40499	and was not the member from Virginia( Mr. MADISON) of this opinion, as I have before stated?
40499	and was not this merely because the Indians were unable to pay for themselves?
40499	and whether, if they are not, it is expedient for them to exercise this discretion at this time?
40499	and would not all acts of Parliament, prior and repugnant to it, be repealed by it?
40499	and, had not his colleague( Mr. LIVINGSTON) quoted the secret Journals of the House?
40499	duty, with freight and shipping charges, be sufficient encouragement?
40499	if not, what proportion?"
40499	interest should be paid on it, 196; if the Government is one party and the individual the other, who is the judge?
40499	on his capital; and that capital tenfold?
40499	on his capital?
40499	or the plundering of the high seas legalized under the name of privateering?
40499	or to whom?
40499	or using such harsh expressions as have issued like a torrent from a gentleman on the other side of the House?
40499	or whether we shall tamely supplicate for justice, and suffer the most effectual means of compulsion to elude our grasp?
40499	or will posterity have a more favorable opinion of the original, because it has been amended by distinct acts?
40499	that Mr. Rutledge has prevented executions from taking the Georgia estate by his personal interference?
40499	that all the estates in Rhode Island and New Jersey are sold?
40499	then is it wrong to express their confidence?
40499	what can the committee report?
40499	what is money, when put in competition with the lives of our friends and brethren?
40499	what would be gained by it?
40499	whether repugnance to a compliance with such demands was not created by such means?
40499	why adopted?
40499	would not carry away slaves at that time in possession of Americans?
47289	Did you give this advice to your American correspondents, upon the supposition that America would acquiesce in the Orders in Council? 47289 For what reason?
47289	Have you lately written to your correspondents in America respecting shipments of American produce to this country? 47289 If the American embargo in general were taken off, and the Orders in Council to be continued, would his trade in that case revive?
47289	In what degree would it affect the dealers in those commodities brought to this country, as to their remittances to this country? 47289 In what manner?
47289	Is she?
47289	To what effect have you so written? 47289 Washington, sir, was not a lawyer, and who can wonder that his fair mind was alarmed by such a solemn declaration?
47289	What is the reason that the Orders in Council prevent the witness sending our cotton goods in ships in ballast? 47289 Who can be so cruel as to refuse him this favor?"
47289	Why not? 47289 Would the Orders in Council have any other effect as to discouraging the trade?
47289	& c.& c. If a parcel of kegs, in those days, alarmed them so much, what will Fulton''s torpedoes do now?
47289	100; why then should they not be manned?
47289	128; is this House to have no influence on the conduct of the Executive?
47289	138; is this House sitting as a body to remunerate those who violated the laws?
47289	138; the subject of contribution considered, 139; let the inquiry be made, 139; what good purpose can it answer?
47289	146; have not the British subjects been liberated?
47289	146; what connection exists between the statements that have been made and the merits of the case?
47289	146; what has been the situation of Great Britain to Spain?
47289	148; what influence was his opinion to have?
47289	149; has Congress a right in order to determine the title to landed property, to refer it to any tribunal whatever?
47289	157; this bill is a concession to Great Britain and is not a hostility to France, 157; what injuries has France done?
47289	172; letter of Mr. Jackson, 172; what does it amount to?
47289	189; not the true principle, 189; what principles are more specifically asserted by Great Britain?
47289	194; if such were the circumstances, does not the occasion require that the American Government take a firm and decided stand?
47289	196; did he know that Mr. Erskine had not full power?
47289	196; it was not his duty to know that he had not full powers?
47289	201; what are the expressions in which it is conveyed?
47289	218; is the experiment worthy to be made?
47289	256; what is the nature and import of this proclamation?
47289	262; is the proclamation an authorized measure of war and legislation?
47289	262; what, then, is the true construction of the treaties of St. Ildefonso and of April, 1803?
47289	281; what is a corporation such as the bill contemplates?
47289	282; the States have the exclusive power to regulate contracts, 282; what participation has this bank in the collection of the revenue?
47289	28; what are our preparations?
47289	28; what is the state of the treasury?
47289	28; what plans are offered for replenishing it?
47289	294; what did mechanics here say relative to granting this charter?
47289	29; consequences of non- intercourse under such circumstances, 30; who has been the first aggressor?
47289	29; if we are to have war, with whom is it to be prosecuted?
47289	29; under these circumstances what is the course that policy would dictate to this country to pursue?
47289	2d, is it expedient?
47289	354; as to France, what are the edicts revoked, and how?
47289	359; are we prepared for those conditions?
47289	368; are we bound by any faithful performance had on the part of France?
47289	368; have either France or Great Britain complied with the condition?
47289	369; is this an honest neutrality to revive the restrictive system against Great Britain, while the French decrees are still in force?
47289	369; must this sacrifice be made in order to bolster up the President''s proclamation so prematurely issued?
47289	369; the present measure is intended as a propitiatory sacrifice to conciliate Napoleon, 369; is it calculated to produce this effect?
47289	372; under the act of May, 1810, 372; what is its character and the obligations arising under it?
47289	373; the occurrence of the fact of revocation involves the propriety of the proclamation, 373; has the fact occurred?
47289	388; has a similar temper and disposition been shown to Great Britain as to France, in the interpretation of the Cadore letter?
47289	407; who are most interested in commerce; the growers of the articles, or the factors, or freighters employed in their exchange?
47289	434; it would be necessary to know the ulterior views of the committee, 434; for what purpose are these troops wanted?
47289	448; gentlemen will not say, we have not a good cause for war, but insist that it is our duty to define it, 448; what do they mean by this?
47289	475; in such statutes there are always exceptions, 475; what would be the course of an individual?
47289	600; where is your commerce to protect?
47289	603; what were the preparations for the Revolutionary war?
47289	624; is there probability of obtaining a recognition of this principle by a continuance of the war?
47289	636; were ever a body of men so abandoned in the hour of need as the American Cabinet by Bonaparte?
47289	698; what did an elevated fitness of character and conduct require of this nation when war was declared?
47289	6; it was a farce, 6; ample time had been given for her to make other arrangements, 6; what accounts have we from there?
47289	70; what are the reasons why the embargo has not come fully up to the expectations of its supporters?
47289	70; yet it has been particularly serviceable in many instances?
47289	75 Blind Alice; A Tale for Good Children, 38 Ellen Leslie; or, The Reward of Self- Control, 38 Florence Arnott; or, Is She Generous?
47289	84; it is not expedient to adopt the second resolution, 84; what will be the effect of the embargo, if continued, as respects ourselves?
47289	A people presenting such an aspect, what have they to expect abroad?
47289	A possession_ by force_?
47289	A serious invasion?
47289	Accompanied with this most consequential inquiry:"Is not this a new State to be admitted?
47289	After the declaration of war, had they any disposition to assail us?
47289	After the declaration of war, what has been the conduct of the Executive?
47289	Again, I ask, were the principles of the embargo submission in 1774-''5-''6?
47289	Again, sir, I would ask the advocates of the doctrine I am reprobating, when will it be proper to show the folly and ruinous consequences of the war?
47289	Again, sir, has the gentleman no feeling for the sufferings, no ear for the groans of our suffering seamen?
47289	Again, what was the effect of the non- intercourse in 1809 upon our Treasury?
47289	Against France?
47289	Against whom were these charges brought?
47289	Against whom?
47289	All the evasions of the embargo have been made with a view to that supply; enforce it, and from whence will they procure the article of lumber?
47289	Am I not, then, Mr. Speaker, authorized to say, that the condition of the law of May, 1810, has not been complied with?
47289	Am I then required to vote for a measure of this kind?
47289	Am I to conclude that they are really Americans in principle?
47289	An ambitious General might corrupt his army, and seize the Capitol-- but will an Admiral reduce us to subjection by bringing his ships up the Potomac?
47289	And I would ask whether either of these events had happened when this corps of militia were ordered out?
47289	And about what?
47289	And are gentlemen considering the restoration of the seamen taken from the Chesapeake as a reason why we should continue the interdict?
47289	And are gentlemen prepared to obey?
47289	And are we not in the act of yielding obedience?
47289	And are we prepared to pronounce so heavy a denunciation on our predecessors, on ourselves, and the other great Departments of our Government?
47289	And are we so sunk in the estimation of the mighty conqueror, that he thinks it necessary and proper to use this as his official language towards us?
47289	And are we, he asked, to be deprived of it when we come to this House-- when we enter this temple of liberty?
47289	And are we, under such circumstances, to renew negotiation by extra missions?
47289	And are you now about again to jeopardize the peace of this nation, without any cause whatever?
47289	And are you ready to repeal the embargo under such a threat as this?
47289	And as to excuse, will it be said that there is nothing of the sort in this case?
47289	And by whom was it opposed?
47289	And by whom were they made?
47289	And could any thing be gathered from any thing they had ever written or said, to induce a belief that this Government had not acted with sincerity?
47289	And did this state of prosperity exist at a time when your commerce was protected by vessels of war?
47289	And do I enjoy my right of walking the street by making myself a prisoner?
47289	And do gentlemen believe Great Britain is willing to sacrifice all these considerations to a refusal to do you justice?
47289	And does she not remain sole mistress?
47289	And for whom?
47289	And from what premises is such a conclusion drawn?
47289	And have we adopted the monkish plan of scourging ourselves for the sins of others?
47289	And have we no means of doing this?
47289	And here, Mr. Speaker, let me ask what other class of men in our society can you find who would have acted thus nobly?
47289	And how do I prove it?
47289	And how has it been regarded by the belligerents?
47289	And how is this proved to be a remedy?
47289	And how was it to be effected?
47289	And how would this bill, Mr. Q. asked, less violate the constitution than such an act would have done?
47289	And how, sir, is it attempted to rebut this fact?
47289	And if it did, and this power was offensive, why was it not stricken out when the amendment was made?
47289	And if it has, is it proper so to decide it?
47289	And if not greater, has not an allowance been made for the capture of some of our ships, or, in other words, for the building of new ones?
47289	And if they be, sir, what inducement can possibly prevent unanimity on the present occasion?
47289	And if they do not intend thus to rely, in what possible way could it serve that Government thus darkly to insinuate it?
47289	And in comparing this bill with those declarations, will it be possible to conceive that we are consistent?
47289	And in fact does it not so demand in many instances?
47289	And is it come to this?
47289	And is it not better to submit to some inconveniences, eventually to insure a free trade?
47289	And is not a man thereby to be deprived of property without due process of law?
47289	And is not here an express authority?"
47289	And is the President to judge from the thanks of the House that he has done his duty?
47289	And is this bill a pioneer to the new swarms of"continental"locusts?
47289	And it may be fairly asked here, what measures Great Britain has taken to prevent her officers from impressing our seamen?
47289	And lastly, will the force be an economical one?
47289	And may we not suppose that these proud Spaniards, as they are called, may have feelings of a like nature?
47289	And must this sacrifice be made in order to bolster up the President''s proclamation so prematurely issued?
47289	And now, let me ask, whether we are prepared for these conditions?
47289	And on the question, Shall this bill pass?
47289	And on the question,"Shall the bill pass?"
47289	And on the question,"Shall this bill pass?"
47289	And on what, sir, does this circulation rest?
47289	And pray, Mr. Speaker, what has Mr. Foster been sent for?
47289	And shall we be told about the profitable commerce with Great Britain?
47289	And shall we disparage our ancestors?--shall we bastardize ourselves by placing them even below the brigands of St. Domingo?
47289	And shall we now refuse admission to the vessels of France?
47289	And surely he will not contend that this advance of premium was caused by the embargo?
47289	And that from mere obstinacy-- an obstinacy not encouraged by the least glimmering of hope?
47289	And that too, sir, at an expense to their own country so enormous in amount?
47289	And thus situated, what are the projects offered for replenishing the public coffers in future?
47289	And we may triumphantly ask, where is the nation or people that enjoy these with more freedom and safety than the American people?
47289	And were not French ships of war then, and have they not since been riding quietly at Annapolis, Norfolk, and elsewhere?
47289	And what advantage do they derive from it?
47289	And what are those objects?
47289	And what do we?
47289	And what do we?
47289	And what does he claim?
47289	And what does this committee do?
47289	And what has this sarcastic Minister of Great Britain given us in exchange?
47289	And what have we done in return?
47289	And what have we to propose, according to the principles of reprisal, to obtain the restoration?
47289	And what injury has the Emperor of Russia done to him?
47289	And what is it now?
47289	And what is its character?
47289	And what is our opinion?
47289	And what is the answer to all this out of doors?
47289	And what is the argument by which this position is maintained?
47289	And what is the language of George the Third, when our Minister presents to his consideration the embargo laws?
47289	And what is the relation in which you stand to France?
47289	And what is to justify this measure of imposing silence?
47289	And what more, sir, could have been asked of us, required, or granted, than is contained in these offers?
47289	And what real benefit has resulted from it to the Government?
47289	And what says Mr. Jackson in reply?
47289	And what security have we that she will not do so?
47289	And what substitute have we for this when it shall be destroyed?
47289	And what was the fact in regard to them?
47289	And what would you think of one individual who had thus conducted to another, and should then retreat?
47289	And what, Mr. Speaker, is now proposed for the future-- what is to retrieve our affairs-- on what are our hopes to rest?
47289	And what, sir, are you doing?
47289	And what, sir, was the conduct of the opposition in the British House of Commons, when their King and country were insulted by a foreign Minister?
47289	And when war came, what said the people?
47289	And where are these insults, these injuries, these vital attempts of the enemy to be found?
47289	And where do you send him?
47289	And whether we are prepared to go to war for them?
47289	And while these measures were going on, could Congress, by staying here constantly, add to the number of men, or expedite the loan?
47289	And who is prepared to say that American seamen shall be surrendered the victims to the British principle of impressment?
47289	And who would pay it?
47289	And whose money, asked Mr. R., is this?
47289	And why did they not?
47289	And why draw that into the debate on the impressment of American citizens from American vessels?
47289	And why should this bank be dissolved?
47289	And why should this clamor be raised on the question whether you will or will not make a formal renunciation of the old articles of political faith?
47289	And why should we make a sort of hotch- potch of two subjects, on which we do not think alike, for the purpose of getting us all united against both?
47289	And why was not a provision inserted to prevent foreigners from purchasing additional stock?
47289	And why?
47289	And will she be insensible to the efforts of our little Navy?
47289	And will you plunge yourselves in war, because you have passed a foolish and ruinous law, and are ashamed to repeal it?
47289	And will you refuse it?
47289	And with a standing army, what security for our liberties?"
47289	And would gentlemen favor this French population at the expense of their own interests and rights?
47289	And would he advise the nation to pursue a course disgraceful, and to which he would not expose himself?
47289	And would not the doing this place us in precisely the same situation as we were in before the Revolution?
47289	And would these persons believe that they were going on an unlawful expedition?
47289	And yet, how does this differ from invading Canada, for the purpose of defending our maritime rights?
47289	And yet, sir, who ever heard of two nations_ going to war_ about a single case of capture, though admitted not to be justified by the laws?
47289	And, I ask, is this resistance?
47289	And, I ask, sir, why, then, admit the vessels of England standing in the same relation to us?
47289	And, I wish to know, sir, what control we have over the Bank of the United States?
47289	And, after that, is it proposed that we shall continue the measure of hostility when the cause alone which led to it is completely done away?
47289	And, are we to endeavor to negotiate, as neutrals, with France, upon this ground, with any reasonable prospect of success?
47289	And, doing that, how could you expect an amicable result?
47289	And, is this course of policy now to be condemned, and regrets entered up that we have not been at war years ago?
47289	And, said Mr. O., shall the Government be less willing to discharge its just debts than an honest individual?
47289	And, shall I be charged with deserting the standard of the people, while I am treading in the footsteps of the great Father of his Country?
47289	And, sir, what does this bank or its branches when resort is had to it?
47289	And, sir, what is the mighty boon which these brave and indigent tars ask from you?
47289	And, sir, what is this principle?
47289	And, sir, what was our"restrictive"system?
47289	And, sir, when these messengers of hell are sent here shall we not look at them?
47289	And, upon whom does the loss fall?
47289	Are gentlemen aware how extensive is the province of master and apprentice?
47289	Are gentlemen ready to injure their country, weaken our Federal Union, the sheet- anchor of our political safety, to reach their political opponents?
47289	Are gentlemen serious?
47289	Are gentlemen willing to submit to this?
47289	Are gentlemen, possessing the feelings of Americans, prepared to submit to such degradation?
47289	Are new States desired?
47289	Are not these cases equally strong?
47289	Are not these searches and seizures, without warrant, on the mere suspicion of a collector, unreasonable searches and seizures?
47289	Are our Ocean rights there?
47289	Are the bounty lands to be given in Canada?
47289	Are the countries of the Baltic and Caspian Seas no longer cultivated?
47289	Are the extravagant prices of articles of the first necessity, superadded to their former embarrassments, to operate as a bounty on their trade?
47289	Are the gentlemen from Georgia and Kentucky the only Senators who have had their feelings wounded by the conduct of the press upon this subject?
47289	Are the merchants the guardians of the public honor?
47289	Are the merchants to be told we will protect their commerce?
47289	Are the old chimerical notions of_ starving_ the enemy, yet floating in the brains of gentlemen?
47289	Are the orders and decrees altered?
47289	Are the people of this country suspected of an intention to abandon their rights or their independence?
47289	Are the wishes of this nation to be unattended to?
47289	Are these apprehensions founded in reason, or are they the chimeras of a fervid and perturbed imagination?
47289	Are these blessings not worth preserving?
47289	Are these not sufficient for the recruiting service?
47289	Are these savings not worth notice?
47289	Are these the blockades which are intended?
47289	Are they likely to happen?
47289	Are they not murderers?
47289	Are they prepared to say the embargo shall be raised, while our commerce is subjected to this kind of depredation?
47289	Are they reduced to that situation, that they will become the vassals of a foreign power-- for what?
47289	Are they to be held as conquered territories?
47289	Are they to be scourged out of us by the birch of the unfledged political pedagogues of the day?
47289	Are they unfit for the East India trade?
47289	Are we bound to adopt this measure on account of the faith of Government being pledged to France by the law of May last?
47289	Are we guilty because we resist the British scalping knife?
47289	Are we in France?
47289	Are we not aware, sir, of the immense sums now invested and actively employed in the different manufactories distributed over our extensive country?
47289	Are we not officially notified that the French leeward islands are declared by proclamation in a state of blockade?
47289	Are we prepared to ingraft these arbitrary principles into our constitution, and cherish them when practised in so arbitrary a manner?
47289	Are we ready to submit to be taxed by Great Britain and France, as if we were their colonies?
47289	Are we sure the State banks can or will do this?
47289	Are we to adhere to the embargo forever, sir?
47289	Are we to renew negotiation, then, when every circumstance manifests that it would be useless?
47289	Are we to understand that the_ salus populi_ shall rule without control?
47289	Are we, gentlemen,( said Mr. R.,) to have a Speaker of the House of Representatives without any election?
47289	Are you prepared to see a foreign power seize what belongs to us?
47289	Are you provided with means to annoy the enemy, or to defend yourselves?
47289	Are you to leave them unprotected, or will you draw the sword in their behalf?
47289	Are you to spend four or five millions of dollars, in addition to your present extraordinary expenditures, to protect commerce?
47289	Are your exposed towns fortified and garrisoned?
47289	Are your seamen safe from impressment?
47289	Arm your merchantmen, as has been proposed, send them out, and you have war directly?
47289	As his Minister said to the King of Epirus,"may we not as well take our bottle of wine before as after this exploit?"
47289	As it does now, through the operation of your embargo, on the planter, on the farmer, on the mechanic, on the day- laborer?
47289	As the proper authority, he thrust it from him as unworthy the coffers of his country; and did not his doing so meet general approbation?
47289	As to France, sir, what were the edicts to be revoked, and how revoked?
47289	As to preparation at home, which is the only preparation contemplated to make, what or whom is it against?
47289	As to respect abroad, what course can be more certain to insure it?
47289	As to the objection which had been offered to receiving the statement of their commanders, what were gentlemen afraid of?
47289	As to the opportunity which the answers afforded for debate, could any one say that sufficient latitude had not been taken in debate?
47289	At the very moment, said Mr. B., that we know that the blacks of St. Domingo are building vessels, shall we dispose of Our public armed vessels?
47289	Aware of the impropriety of his deciding, he tells you-- what?
47289	Aye, sir-- and is that true?
47289	Because he is not a gentleman, shall we assert a falsehood?
47289	Because we can not guard against every possible danger, shall we provide against none?
47289	Because we can not, are we to succumb to others?
47289	Begin this system of abstract legislation, and where are you to stop?
47289	Being questioned if Henry had mentioned the names of any person with whom he had conferred?
47289	But I am asked, how will you contend with a maritime nation, without a navy?
47289	But I may ask, what on the ocean did we enjoy but by the sufferance of Great Britain?
47289	But I will suppose that you could export without interruption; would the whole of the exportable produce pay for the war during the continuance of it?
47289	But are not your privateers as much a part of the naval force of the nation as your ships of war?
47289	But are we unreasonable in expecting, before we give up the old opinion, to hear some argument in favor of the new one?
47289	But by whom had they been suppressed when they ran counter to the interests of his country?
47289	But can any man imagine that, if we invade the British colonies, the war will be there?
47289	But did an atom of it flow in from the operation of the embargo?
47289	But does that justify this resolution?
47289	But gentlemen were desirous now to fix the number of souls which should entitle to a Representative-- and why?
47289	But has he shown that it is necessary in order to make a preliminary arrangement similar to that entered into?
47289	But have the people of Spain acquiesced?
47289	But have they shown, by a train of argument, that their overthrow was, in any degree, ascribable to their maritime greatness?
47289	But how are we to cause these rights to be respected?
47289	But how can this be done?
47289	But how has this plea been supported?
47289	But how is this protection to be afforded?
47289	But how was it received by the American Cabinet?
47289	But how, Mr. Speaker, are we to cause our rights to be respected?
47289	But if it were not, where is the impropriety of an inquiry?
47289	But in this instance is the territory vacant-- or uninhabited-- or abandoned by its proprietors?
47289	But is it possible that an intolerant spirit of party has prepared us for this?
47289	But is it true that according to the usages of nations this is a novel system, or one now, for the first time, put in use by the British?
47289	But is that the case in relation to the Executive, on whose future dispositions rest the best interests of this nation?
47289	But is war the true remedy?
47289	But of what value would these provinces be to us, if they could be easily acquired?
47289	But on whose side has this intrigue been?
47289	But receiving all the sanctions of a law, and as such containing a rule of conduct in certain specified cases, what was the Executive to do?
47289	But shall we therefore abandon the ocean, yield our birthright, our goodly heritage, without a struggle?
47289	But should he, on great questions, be denied the privilege of speaking?
47289	But should we have been prepared by winter, the time to which gentlemen wished to have deferred the declaration of war?
47289	But some gentlemen affect a sympathy for the Canadians-- why, say they, will you make war on them?
47289	But suppose they do not; suppose they fail, and are captured in the attempt; what is that to us?
47289	But the question recurs, needful for what?
47289	But to what does this doctrine lead?
47289	But was there that fatal necessity; that command from Jove,"Ye fates fulfil it, and ye powers approve,"to erect corporations?
47289	But we are told that the enterprising merchant is deprived of an opportunity-- of what?
47289	But we must inquire, what is a just and necessary war?
47289	But were there not other decrees?
47289	But what are the reasons why it has not fully come up to the expectations of its supporters, as a measure of coercion?
47289	But what blow are you prepared to strike?
47289	But what can we do with four seventy- fours?
47289	But what does the correspondence referred to prove?
47289	But what has_ Revolutionary_ Spain done?
47289	But what have the British Government done on the subject?
47289	But what is here proposed?
47289	But what is the fact?
47289	But what is the law of nature and the dictate of wisdom, on this subject?
47289	But what is the nature of the defence which one of our large States may be supposed interested to obtain from the General Government?
47289	But what is the principle in contest between the two Governments?
47289	But what is their situation at present?
47289	But what is this law as modified by the practice of nations?
47289	But what obliges Congress to give credit at all?
47289	But what was left, as to her, for the surrender or repeal of which she had any anxiety?
47289	But what was the style in which gentlemen spoke at our last summer session, when the subject of approbation was then before us?
47289	But what will the merchants of Salem, and Boston, and New York, and Philadelphia, and Baltimore, the men of Marblehead and Cape Cod, say to this?
47289	But what, said Mr. C, has been the history of claims for four or five years past?
47289	But what, sir, is the price we have at length paid for the repeal?
47289	But whence, Mr. Chairman, proceeds this system of slander and abuse?
47289	But where is the difference between that and suffering yourself to be controlled by the arbitrary act of another nation?
47289	But while we are searching for the means of annoying the commerce of Britain, does it become us to overlook at this moment the condition of our own?
47289	But who was ever the friend of non- intercourse?
47289	But why is it necessary to know, on this occasion, whether the President did call for these powers or not?
47289	But why is it to be continued?
47289	But why this argument of despair?
47289	But why this change?
47289	But why, sir, are the injuries these nations have done contrasted, and those of the one made an apology for those of the other?
47289	But why, sir, should this House give an expression of approbation of the President?
47289	But will you trust your funds with an institution thus precarious, and whose solidity is distrusted even by its best friends?
47289	But"where, and what was this execrable shape-- if shape it may be called, which shape has none?"
47289	But, I ask, sir, if the State Governments do not possess this gigantic power?
47289	But, I would ask the gentleman from Connecticut, and the gentleman from Pennsylvania, also, if this be one of their abstract propositions?
47289	But, Is it necessary that a resolution containing it should be passed by this House?
47289	But, Mr. President, what is the real cause of those failures?
47289	But, Mr. Speaker, what was the fact?
47289	But, Mr. Speaker, wherefore change the term of enlistment, from five years, or during the war, to one year?
47289	But, are not the measures which have been adopted, submission?
47289	But, decide it either way, how is trading as far as we have ability, made less abject than not trading at all?
47289	But, for these things, we must stipulate an equivalent; and what can that be, but to unite in striking England from the list of independent nations?
47289	But, for what purpose are you to send them out?
47289	But, is it in this nation, and at this time, that it can be supposed that the profits of commerce are confined to the merchant?
47289	But, it seems we have changed all this-- we have perverted the whole course of procedure-- and why?
47289	But, it would be well to inquire, on what principle the belligerents pretend to justify these commercial restrictions?
47289	But, on the other hand, should we not be ready to act on that day, is it not pledging ourselves that we will then act, whether we are ready or not?
47289	But, on the second head, can your law be executed?
47289	But, said Mr. R., is time now so precious?
47289	But, said he, for what purpose, I feel impelled to ask, are you going to build these vessels?
47289	But, says the gentleman, will you take the child from the parent?
47289	But, since that election, another has taken place for members of Congress; and how has that turned out?
47289	But, sir, admit for a moment the bank may be formed to collect the revenue, ought it not to be exclusively used for that object?
47289	But, sir, admit the gentleman''s statement; will a war with Great Britain increase the danger?
47289	But, sir, can we quit this subject without looking more particularly at the consequences which result from this series of injuries?
47289	But, sir, gentlemen may ask, where is the remedy?
47289	But, sir, has this unparalleled enterprise, this gallant spirit, been carried on by a navy?
47289	But, sir, how happens it that we still remain under the distresses occasioned by the belligerents?
47289	But, sir, how have those orders at last been repealed?
47289	But, sir, is it prudent to rely upon an institution that may refuse you assistance?
47289	But, sir, let me ask what sort of possession?
47289	But, sir, let me ask, whether the disposition to lend be not as necessary a means towards accomplishing a loan as the ability?
47289	But, sir, let us admit the fact and the whole force of the argument, I ask whose is the fault?
47289	But, sir, what has been the state of the country since the declaration of war?
47289	But, sir, what is now the state of things?
47289	But, suppose they had been manned in other ways, were not privateers as useful in annoying the enemy as public ships?
47289	But, what are the principles more specifically asserted by Great Britain?
47289	But, what best consults the honor of a Republican Government?
47289	But, what have we done?
47289	But, what is that to us?
47289	But, what security did those ships afford?
47289	But, what was it sent there for?
47289	But, why, I pray you?
47289	By Mary Howitt, 38 Who Shall be Greatest?
47289	By a suitable instrument I reconvey or retrocede the estate called Louisiana to you as I now hold it, and as you held it; what passes to you?
47289	By force?
47289	By gentlemen who are for active offence?
47289	By granting them a right which nature has already given to them?
47289	By putting in force the non- importation law?
47289	By showing a physical disability in the country to avail itself of this force?
47289	By the law of''98, the President certainly could direct relative to the age and size of a recruit-- yet to whom did he apply?
47289	By what ligament, on what basis, on what possible foundation, does it rest?
47289	By what?
47289	By whom is it so called?
47289	By whom is this immense power wielded?
47289	By whom, would you listen to them, are they most keenly felt?
47289	By whom?
47289	Can England complain of our giving credit to a man with whom her first Secretary of State and the Governor General of Canada correspond?
47289	Can a violation of a solemn pledge confer an obligation which was only intended to be created on the complete fulfilment of that pledge?
47289	Can an agreement arising from the exercise of this power, supersede the right of exercising the power expressly delegated by the constitution itself?
47289	Can any man do this, and not realize that the destiny of the people inhabiting such a country is essentially maritime?
47289	Can any man tell what would be the consequence of war, in these times?
47289	Can any one doubt that our Cabinet meant that it should have this effect?
47289	Can any submission be more palpable, more"abject, more disgraceful?"
47289	Can any thing be more in direct subserviency to the views of the French Emperor?
47289	Can any thing be more obviously at variance with the spirit of the constitution and the first principles of civil liberty?
47289	Can any thing be more palpable than this?
47289	Can arming our merchant vessels, by resisting the whole navy of Great Britain, oppose force to force?
47289	Can it be any thing but the revolutions in Spain and Portugal?
47289	Can it be because Bonaparte has said he loves the Americans?
47289	Can it be conceived that all this could have been carried on, if General Miranda had not meant to conceal it from the Government?
47289	Can it be necessary gravely to answer these assertions?
47289	Can it then be said, that with treble the population, and in an offensive war, necessity requires the dangerous innovation?
47289	Can one million of militia be overpowered by thirty thousand regulars?
47289	Can such conduct be called American?
47289	Can such men pretend that peace is their object?
47289	Can that be true which gives the greatest violence to party animosity?
47289	Can that be true which, when the whole physical force of the country is needed, withdraws half of that force?
47289	Can that, then, be true in relation to war which would be reprobated in every other case?
47289	Can the Legislature give me a moral right to violate the Constitution of the United States, which I have sworn to support?
47289	Can the President be as well acquainted with the qualifications and abilities of officers in the militia as the Governors of the States?
47289	Can the fundamental principles of the constitution, rendering contracts sacred, be thus uprooted and destroyed?
47289	Can there be any necessity for this?
47289	Can they sell these lots, these brick houses, these canal shares?
47289	Can they touch no nerve in which Britons feel?
47289	Can they, or will they, prevent the march of an enemy''s forces through that territory into the United States?
47289	Can this be a desirable state of things?
47289	Can this be done?
47289	Can this ever be an alternative?
47289	Can this interdiction be defended on this ground?
47289	Can we do too much for this man?
47289	Can we wonder that it should be cherished by its master?
47289	Can you expect system and order unless you pay for it?
47289	Can you have economy when you go into market to bid for what you want?
47289	Can you punish them for not doing it?
47289	Can your law fail of producing more injury and loss to the United States, than benefit?
47289	Contending themselves for the right of naturalization, can the British Government deny it to others?
47289	Could America expect to starve this nation?
47289	Could Congress transfer to him legislative power, and authorize him to declare of how many members this body should consist?
47289	Could any man say that it was not proper that he should have it?
47289	Could any man say what would take place between this day and the third of March?
47289	Could it not demand prompt payment of the duties?
47289	Could not a single foreign frigate enter almost any of our harbors now and batter down our towns?
47289	Could not even a single gunboat sweep some of them?
47289	Could not the Territory of Columbia have been governed without erecting a single corporation in it?
47289	Could one be added to the catalogue?
47289	Could seven millions of people obtain glory by precipitating themselves upon half a million, and trampling them into the dust?
47289	Could that gentleman repose his head upon his pillow without returning thanks to God that he was descended from English parentage?
47289	Could they have chosen a more appropriate phraseology?
47289	Could this doctrine be asserted by any gentleman?
47289	Did Venice owe her decline, or fall, to her navy?
47289	Did a British gallery ever exhibit such a spectacle?
47289	Did ever one Government exhibit towards any people a more bloody and relentless spirit of rancor?
47289	Did he too oppose this proposition on the ground of resisting the belligerents or of making war with England?
47289	Did it arrest the promulgation, or has it abrogated the Orders in Council-- those orders which have given birth to a new era in commerce?
47289	Did it declare to how many Representatives each State should be entitled?
47289	Did it enter into the conception of the people when its principles were discussed?
47289	Did it follow that minor considerations should be placed out of view or yielded up entirely?
47289	Did it not interdict all trade with France under the most severe and heavy penalties?
47289	Did it prevent Mr. Jefferson from taking a war course?
47289	Did it prevent the unmanly attack upon the Chesapeake?
47289	Did it produce starvation in the West Indies?
47289	Did not the honor, the character, the independence of the country require of us to go back to our original neutral ground?
47289	Did not the late President, when he came into place, refuse to let such money come into the treasury in the case of the worthless Callender?
47289	Did not this bill completely come up to their wishes?
47289	Did our fathers either effect a change in her injurious policy or prevent a war by non- intercourse?
47289	Did that make no difference?
47289	Did the nation call it submission when it was enacted under General Washington?
47289	Do gentlemen believe it to be true?
47289	Do gentlemen consider harpooning a vessel to be like harpooning a whale, which has no men on board of it to take out the harpoon?
47289	Do gentlemen mean an abject acquiescence to those iniquitous decrees and Orders in Council?
47289	Do gentlemen of the"old school"undertake to say that the Father of their country submitted then to George III.?
47289	Do gentlemen plead the necessity of the case?
47289	Do gentlemen say that there is no insult in this?
47289	Do gentlemen suppose that boats can approach without the most imminent danger?
47289	Do not gentlemen perceive the tendency of this measure to involve us with the States upon delicate points?
47289	Do the wrongs of this nation end with this outrage?
47289	Do these gentlemen come forward and tell you that that the embargo is submission?
47289	Do these two declarations hang together, sir?
47289	Do they contend that the causes which rendered it necessary have been removed?
47289	Do they mean that it should be relinquished to our former masters without a struggle?
47289	Do they not bear a hostile aspect?
47289	Do we doubt the inveteracy of the French hatred of the British navy when it has existed so many years?
47289	Do we not pay an annual tribute to Algiers for liberty to navigate the sea safer from its corsairs?
47289	Do we want plunder?
47289	Do you intend again to stretch them on the rack, again to cover the country with sackcloth and ashes?
47289	Do you make this declaration to the enemy at the outset?
47289	Do you mean to submit?
47289	Do you persevere in the conquest of Canada?
47289	Do you see one gentleman, one solitary gentleman of one party, discriminated generally as a Federal, who does not vote for this measure throughout?
47289	Do you yet contend that the object is to protect commerce?
47289	Does France purchase your tobacco or cotton, which heretofore have found a market there?
47289	Does a necessity exist superior to the laws?
47289	Does a proffer of settlement, connected with such language, look like a disposition or an intention to conciliate?
47289	Does an unprotected seacoast of two thousand miles afford her no opportunities of attacking us?
47289	Does any gentlemen believe, even allowing the pressure of the embargo to be great upon her, that she can yield, that she can afford to yield?
47289	Does any man believe it?
47289	Does any man believe that this frontier traffic is not as beneficial to us as to our enemies?
47289	Does any man doubt that the war is justly undertaken?
47289	Does he believe he has all this time been deceiving the Legislature?
47289	Does he discharge as he ought the duties of a friend, a brother in society?
47289	Does he recollect the invasion of the Spaniards two years ago?
47289	Does it comport with our honor and dignity to admit into our ports and harbors the very vessels destroying our commerce?
47289	Does it fall within the power to pay the debts of the United States?
47289	Does it follow, from that, that they are entitled to all the rights of hospitality that one nation could possibly show to another?
47289	Does it follow, in all cases, that that which would have prevented the war in the first instance should terminate the war?
47289	Does it not confine the legality of arming to resident citizens alone?
47289	Does it not go, not only to the abandonment of the ocean, but to the seacoast also?
47289	Does it not then result, inevitably, as the dictate of common prudence, that we should, as soon as possible, commence our naval preparations?
47289	Does it, then, become the representatives of the nation to leave the nation at the mercy of a corporation?
47289	Does not England naturalize foreigners?
47289	Does not flour find a great proportion of its consumption on the continent?
47289	Does not the constitution say, no laws shall be passed abrogating contracts?
47289	Does not the industry of the country languish?
47289	Does not the right to create a bank, which shall issue this representative of money, come within the same reason?
47289	Does not this prove that so much danger existed on the ocean that it was next to impossible to pass without seizure and condemnation?
47289	Does she not naturalize your citizens?
47289	Does she produce them at home?
47289	Does the bank affect the people locally?
47289	Does the gentleman mean to assimilate a tribute exacted by Great Britain with that paid to Algiers?
47289	Does the gentleman mean to excite our fears for the loss of our property?
47289	Does the gentleman say that it was atrocious in 1798 to defend ourselves against the French?
47289	Does the history of the past in our own, or any other country, warrant such an expectation?
47289	Does the prospect of security there flatter us?
47289	Does this prove a change?
47289	Does this prove that the embargo was the cause of the change of the politics of the Maryland Legislature?
47289	Does this, sir, comport with the principles of justice?
47289	Does your flag float afterwards in honor?
47289	Even if the price was as low as eight, or say seven dollars, wherefore should the soldier receive less than any other man?
47289	First, has the United States a claim, either real or disputed, to this territory?
47289	For I would ask, what are we to promise to ourselves from such a system as this; what will be the probable effects of it?
47289	For a private, unassisted, insulated, unallied individual?
47289	For any great boon that this Government has received from the hands of Great Britain?
47289	For gallons will you spill torrents; or am I to understand that we shall have war without bloodshed?
47289	For what have you given money to build fortifications?
47289	For what purpose were protections given to American seamen?
47289	For what purpose, sir, let me ask, have we adopted the resolution preceding this?
47289	For what purpose, then, could they be wanted?
47289	For what reason are we to subject even our coasters to plunder and abuse?
47289	For what was he contending?
47289	For what was the object of the opposition in this debate?
47289	For what, sir, are we assembled here under a constitution the purest in the world?
47289	For whose benefit, sir, is the Government to strip itself of this right, so essential for the due administration of its finances?
47289	For why?
47289	Forty thousand?
47289	From these principles what desertions have we not witnessed?
47289	From whence was this conclusion drawn?
47289	From which decision Mr. RANDOLPH moved an appeal; which being seconded, the question was put,"Is the decision of the Chair correct?"
47289	From which of these stations, said Mr. C., could she have spared, with safety and prudence, a portion of the force employed?
47289	GOLD.--The first object with a wise Legislature is, Is the law expedient?
47289	Gentlemen ask, has there not been a satisfactory adjustment of our differences with Great Britain?
47289	Gentlemen get up and abuse the Spanish Government and people, and what then?
47289	Good heavens, between what, Mr. Speaker?
47289	Ground their arms and surrender themselves prisoners of war; or are they, sir, to drop their muskets and take to their heels?
47289	Had Congress that power?
47289	Had he done it?
47289	Had it not been more injurious to the United States than to foreign nations?
47289	Had not a special court been refused in relation to a property of much greater value than this?
47289	Had not gentlemen even called others by name, and introduced every subject on any question?
47289	Had not the Navy of Great Britain a beginning?
47289	Had the decrees been so modified, under present circumstances, as that they had ceased to violate our neutral commerce?
47289	Had the interdiction been confined to British vessels by this law, what would Great Britain have said to this discrimination?
47289	Had they not amply redressed the insult of the individual?
47289	Had they not had them in other countries?
47289	Had we, when all the rest of Louisiana was surrendered to us, obtained possession of Florida?
47289	Has France herself agreed to bury her surplus breadstuffs in the earth?
47289	Has Great Britain held out the hand of friendship, and have we refused to meet her?
47289	Has a picaroon or a buccaneer ever been chastised by them?
47289	Has any capitalist said he would venture out in the present tempest which blackens the ocean?
47289	Has any malediction of Heaven doomed them to perpetual vassalage?
47289	Has it come to this?
47289	Has it occurred?
47289	Has it operated upon the present Executive?
47289	Has it operated, to any perceptible extent, except upon ourselves, during the twelvemonth it has been in existence?
47289	Has it released from galling and ignominious bondage one solitary American seaman, bleeding under British oppression?
47289	Has not Congress solemnly pledged itself to the world not to surrender our rights?
47289	Has not Great Britain driven them all from the ocean?
47289	Has not our country increased in wealth and population, in a superior degree to any country on earth?
47289	Has not the British army increased with equal pace with her navy?
47289	Has not the United States''Bank produced serious alarm?
47289	Has not, in fact, the gallant Captain Decatur taken our own seamen out of one of them?
47289	Has our hospitality been violated and our officers insulted in our very ports by the vessels of France?
47289	Has she not seized every vessel which has arrived at her ports since that period?
47289	Has she withdrawn her Orders in Council, and have we insisted on a continuance of our commercial restrictions?
47289	Has the Nile ceased to fructify the fields of Egypt?
47289	Has the President acted correctly or not?
47289	Has the President given any such information?
47289	Has the embargo answered?
47289	Has the experiment been tried?
47289	Has the love of gain superseded every other motive in the breasts of Americans?
47289	Has the navy of Russia protected her commerce?
47289	Has there been any thing of the kind on our part?
47289	Have Sicily and the Barbary coasts returned to a barren state of nature?
47289	Have either complied?
47289	Have gentlemen reflected on the disastrous consequences of such a system at the present time?
47289	Have our citizens been restored to their country?
47289	Have they attempted even to show that there exists in the nature of this power a necessary tendency to destroy the nation using it?
47289	Have they been committed within our waters?
47289	Have they brought forward the mass of their voters as signers to petitions?
47289	Have they disturbed the quiet of either House?
47289	Have they ever refused supplies because a war was unpopular, since their revolution?
47289	Have they not considered it a delicate one?
47289	Have they not done so in Baltimore?
47289	Have they not in their conduct given us the most sound and wholesome advice on the subject?
47289	Have they not more troops on and near the line than we have?
47289	Have they not told you, continually, to let them alone; that they knew their own business best?
47289	Have they taken a single man out of a ship of war, or one man out of the dungeons of Paris or Arras?
47289	Have this Government, and the people of this country, no interest in the prosperity of these manufactories?
47289	Have those causes wrought on her a perseverance in her measures?
47289	Have those certificates, or protections, as they are commonly called, been confined to_ bona fide_ American citizens?
47289	Have those contingencies happened?
47289	Have we any French frigates now in our seas?
47289	Have we any other evidence of the disposition of the Executive in relation to this bill than that certain gentlemen are in favor of it?
47289	Have we constitutional authority to legislate on this subject, and is it expedient so to do?
47289	Have we done nothing?
47289	Have we done this, as respects Great Britain?
47289	Have we from the effects of their trial any lively hope of success in our present attempt?
47289	Have we gone to insurance companies or corporations of one kind or another?
47289	Have we indeed received no answer?
47289	Have we intrigued with the people to induce them to take sides with us?
47289	Have we made an impression on the Prince Regent and his Ministry?
47289	Have we no country of our own?
47289	Have we not already territory enough?
47289	Have we not an undoubted right to navigate the Mediterranean?
47289	Have we not conclusive evidence to the contrary?
47289	Have we not, moreover, the best recorded proof that the present President holds similar opinions on this subject?
47289	Have we obtained the objects for which it was commenced?
47289	Have we opened our ports to her traders?
47289	Have we renewed commercial intercourse with her?
47289	Have we stirred up the people into town meetings to aid us by memorials?
47289	Have you an army or navy which can make any impression?
47289	Have you any thing to hope, by operating upon the minds of the rulers of that nation, a conviction that you are boasting no longer?
47289	Have you ever heard of an army on earth that was carried into the field before it had been seasoned in the camp?
47289	Have you not as good a right to do that as to pass this law?
47289	Have you the least prospect, if you declare war, of attacking Canada this season?
47289	He asked if we were prepared to violate the public faith?
47289	He asked what will be the situation of this people in sixty days?
47289	He asked whether we were prepared to assail our enemy, or repel her attacks?
47289	He asked, how efficient could that species of force be, of which the Chief Magistrate did not think it worth while to have a record kept?
47289	He asked, what security had the United States, if they did all this, if they submitted to such abject humiliation, that Great Britain would treat?
47289	He asked, whether it is wise in an unarmed nation, as we are, to commence hostilities against one so completely prepared?
47289	He asked, why rush with this precipitancy into the war?
47289	He demanded what there is in the nature and construction of maritime power to excite the fears that have been indulged?
47289	He had satisfied his mind that they had engaged in this business unknowingly and unwillingly-- and, what was now asked of the Government?
47289	He said, there were two parties in this House; and asked, is it ever known how a question will be decided, until it is taken?
47289	He sees the danger clearly?
47289	He supposes a sally from a Spanish garrison upon the American forces, and asks what is to be done?
47289	He sympathized with the sufferings of his impressed and incarcerated fellow- citizens; but would a territorial war exempt them from impressment?
47289	He was asked if any essential alterations would be made within sixty days, in the defence of our maritime frontier or seaports?
47289	He wished to know, in point of principle, what difference gentlemen could point out between the abandonment of this or of that maritime right?
47289	He would ask that gentleman if he was, during the last embargo, a ship owner?
47289	He would, for instance, ask whether so much as related to sacked towns, bombarded cities, ruined commerce, and revolting blacks, had been realized?
47289	How abstract, I pray you?
47289	How are these orders and decrees to be opposed but by war, except we keep without their reach?
47289	How are these pacific advances met by the other party?
47289	How are they to be supplied with the article of salt?
47289	How are we to get things right?
47289	How can we get rid of the war, if we may not say that it is inexpedient, impolitic, and ruinous?
47289	How can we make a sacrifice of our own opinions?
47289	How comes he in the ranks against us, with his tomahawk and scalping knife?
47289	How could one committee properly attend to the mass of business before the Committee of Commerce and Manufactures?
47289	How could they be made one with the United States unless by the use of the same language?
47289	How did this happen?
47289	How distressed?
47289	How had it turned out?
47289	How had this indisposition for war got into the House?
47289	How happens all this?
47289	How has it been applied?
47289	How has the President performed this constitutional duty?
47289	How has this prediction been verified?
47289	How is he to know that they have expressed their sense of his conduct from proper motives?
47289	How is it now?
47289	How is it submission, then, to these orders for us to trade to Gottenburg, when neither France nor Britain command, nor prohibit it?
47289	How is our faith plighted?
47289	How is our honor affected by removing it?
47289	How is that to be done?
47289	How many were unable to apply?
47289	How shall the law be repealed?
47289	How shall we best do it?
47289	How stand the people of the British Empire?
47289	How then can any encouragement be drawn from that precedent, to support us under the privations of the present system of commercial suspension?
47289	How then can we trust to the future predictions of gentlemen?
47289	How then has it happened that Congress has taken upon itself the right to erect light- houses, under their general power to regulate commerce?
47289	How was it in the conspiracy of Blount and Liston?
47289	How wide- spread the relation in the community?
47289	How, I ask, could the President act a different part, from the evidence in the case?
47289	How, let me ask you, sir, is your Government constituted?
47289	How, sir, can I make this matter plainer?
47289	How, sir, is it with the State banks?
47289	How, then, could the gentleman, after his admissions, with the facts before him and the nation, complain?
47289	How, then, is the national faith plighted to France by that law?
47289	How, then, sir, are we to account for their late conduct?
47289	I ask gentlemen, if her ability to carry on a distant war by land or sea, has diminished?
47289	I ask him whether he considers the impressment of American seamen"a violation of an essential right of this country?"
47289	I ask if it is necessary?
47289	I ask the gentlemen on the other side of the House, whether we have not gained something in this respect by the war?
47289	I ask then what physical ability we have to discharge the State taxes, or any other?
47289	I ask this House and this nation, whether their hopes or wishes extend beyond what we then enjoyed?
47289	I ask whether, under such circumstances, the question ought not to be considered settled?
47289	I ask you, sir, where is the strength of which these nations formerly boasted?
47289	I ask you, then, sir, why do we hesitate?
47289	I ask, did any nation ever do more?
47289	I ask, now, whether the impression made by the gentleman from New York was a just one?
47289	I beg to be excused for asking him( for I know he scorns submission as much as any man) if submission will pay the public debt?
47289	I have been asked, shall Congress rise and do nothing?
47289	I have no idea of laughing the subject out of the House; but how can gentlemen see the least probability of success in the invention?
47289	I know, sir, that there are men who condemn the conduct of the President in issuing the proclamation; and why?
47289	I make the appeal to gentlemen, I demand of the chairman of the committee who reported this bill, why and wherefore it is presented?
47289	I might trace the scheme a little further back, and ask, whence the outrages?
47289	I now solemnly appeal to gentlemen, why shall we, at this moment, make this marked distinction?
47289	I pray you, was not that the condition of the country when Mr. Rose arrived?
47289	I request gentlemen to reflect, whether this is not, in point of fact, an abandonment of the other points in dispute?
47289	I say, perish the heart, the head and the tongue, that will attempt her justification or apology?
47289	I shall, however, examine the non- intercourse system from the date of the law of March, 1809, and inquire what was its professed object?
47289	I will admit, sir, that this is not the time or place to institute the general inquiry, whether banks are or are not beneficial to a nation?
47289	I will ask how many regiments you have in your present establishment?
47289	I will ask the gentleman from South Carolina, what has the nation benefited for this enormous expenditure?
47289	I will ask the honorable gentleman from Maryland whether he does not know that letters have been written for that purpose?
47289	I will ask, how we succeeded in the Revolutionary war?
47289	I will ask, in return, when an officer is appointed to collect the customs, has he not a salary and emoluments?
47289	I will ask, what would be the case if such laws had not been passed by the States?
47289	I will now proceed, Mr. President, to inquire whether the facts stated in the resolution are supported by the correspondence upon which it is founded?
47289	I will put this question to gentlemen: what has Britain done which would require a discrimination as to her public vessels?
47289	I wish to know of gentlemen, whether trading with the belligerents, under their present restrictions on commerce, would not be submission?
47289	I would ask, how can it be contended to the contrary?
47289	I would ask, in a few words, if we ought to continue this establishment in its present state?
47289	If B refuses, does A, under the circumstances of such a declaration, violate any obligation, should he refuse to permit the passage?
47289	If France has revoked her decrees, is not a non- importation with Great Britain inevitable, and does it not exist?
47289	If France revoked her decrees, she was entitled to a non- importation against Great Britain, and if she failed to revoke, what?
47289	If a gentleman from Baltimore gives his agent instructions to provide every thing necessary for an East India voyage, what would he expect?
47289	If a man submits, of what use are calculations of money, for it may be drawn from him at the pleasure of his master?
47289	If done, has it been so done as to amount to an honorable fulfilment or acceptance of our terms?
47289	If gentlemen will have it that this is the accepted time for war, how has it happened that we have not had it before?
47289	If he did not feel perfectly comfortable in a cold day, should he therefore divest himself of all clothing?
47289	If he wished to promote division, how could he better attain his object than by denouncing the people of a particular section?
47289	If her Legislature possess it not, can they give it to a Senator?
47289	If it is possible to operate on France by commercial restrictions, let me ask if this bill will not accomplish that object?
47289	If it was indispensably necessary a day or two ago to provide a revenue, what had since occurred obviating that necessity?
47289	If it was not to have influence, why thus evade a decision on the prayer of the petitioner?
47289	If it would, to what amount?
47289	If justice be not already established in our country, can there be any probability that a more formidable army will effect an object so desirable?
47289	If not, then what is meant by this grant to take the property of your constituents, and leave them no remedy for the injury?
47289	If obligations of friendship do exist, why does Great Britain rend those ties asunder, and open the bleeding wounds of former conflicts?
47289	If obtained, will it accomplish the end proposed?
47289	If on such a question the House was to be governed by individual interests, what was the nation to expect from them?
47289	If our Government takes away our liberty, is it necessary to contend with a foreign Government for our rights?
47289	If our towns could not be defended by fortifications, he asked, would ten frigates defend them?
47289	If provision was made for trying this case, must it not be extended to all others?
47289	If she can turn our vessels into her ports to pay duty and take out license, what prohibits us from doing the same as to her vessels?
47289	If she has it not, can she give it to her Legislature?
47289	If so, did he not go to England during the embargo?
47289	If so, how can we rely on them against a foe invading our country?
47289	If so, how did he go?
47289	If so, what will be the effect on the articles of cession and agreement between you and Georgia?
47289	If so, why not give the same credence to the letters of the Duke of Massa and the Duc de Gaete?
47289	If so, why not unite against the one as well as against the other?
47289	If so, would not a fleet secure us from attack also?
47289	If such doctrine is to be admitted, when should we have had a moment''s peace?
47289	If the alleged principle of retaliation be not the true one, what is?
47289	If the article of the constitution, however, did not mean that Congress might take States out of new Territories, what did it mean?
47289	If the decree existed in April, 1811, why was it not communicated to this nation, the only one interested in the subject?
47289	If the present establishment is not full, what is the reason?
47289	If the right to land be indefeasible, could the Government run a road through it?
47289	If their existence had been known at the time, would the President in his message recommending an embargo have failed to notice the fact?
47289	If then assistance should be offered on the part of the constitutionalists, what is your army to do?
47289	If this law were passed, Mr. W. asked, was it perfect?
47289	If this law were to pass, could the Secretary of State be authorized to declare the number of Representatives to which each State was entitled?
47289	If this principle, then, be equally urged by both, who is to judge between them?
47289	If this was the fact, as the committee appear to have believed, I ask, in what their case differs from that of men taken captives by the Algerines?
47289	If this were not her object, why such a continued system of illegitimate blockades?
47289	If we are to have war, with whom is it to be prosecuted-- not in terms I mean, but in fact?
47289	If you did not at once return blow for blow, and injury for injury, would you not at least take a little time to consider?
47289	If you mean war, if the spirit of the country is up to it, why have you been spending five months in idle debate?
47289	If you settled at all, might you not consider it your duty in some way to make him feel the consequences of his strange intemperance of passion?
47289	If your citizens are united, you can capture Canada, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick; when you have effected this, what remains next to be done?
47289	If, as some gentlemen say, it is a precursor to war, there were some very serious questions to be asked-- What is the situation of our fortresses?
47289	If, at so early a period, the right of search for men was objected to by this Government, how much more forcible is the objection now?
47289	If, said Mr. C, we are not able to meet the wolves of the forest, shall we put up with the barking of every petty fox that trips across our way?
47289	If, sir, the sufferers under the sedition law did suffer contrary to the constitution, ought not their expenses to be reimbursed?
47289	If, then, it be inexpedient to make this discrimination against Great Britain, how is it less so, when directed against France?
47289	If, then, while creating a public debt, we neglect to provide the means of payment, what will be the consequence?
47289	In a word, is resistance submission?
47289	In a year from the time of enlistment their term expires, and what becomes of your conquest, without force to keep it, supposing it to be made?
47289	In bank bills, the credit of which is at least doubtful?
47289	In despite of experience, do they yet believe that our blessed country_ alone_ can produce food for the world?
47289	In other words, why the number of officers should now be fixed agreeably to the act of April 21, 1806, rather than that of the 3d of March, 1801?
47289	In peace we require no defence, and shall we declare war in order to defend ourselves?
47289	In performance of their lofty promises, in disregard of sacred duties, what have they done?
47289	In point of revenue how does it work?
47289	In relation to negotiating with measures of coercion in existence, Mr. N. asked, when did the violations of our rights commence?
47289	In spite of all its boasted effects, are not the two nations brought to the very brink of war?
47289	In such case, what will you do?
47289	In such case, would staying at home, and refusing any more to go upon the sea, be an exercise of independence in the citizens of New York?
47289	In the Revolutionary war how did England stand-- how her islands?
47289	In the commencement of this inquiry, Mr. Chairman, we naturally ask ourselves, what edicts are to be revoked, and how are they to be revoked?
47289	In the days of terror, we shrunk at standing armies; and what is the object now-- defence?
47289	In the intermediate period, what aspect does a Union, thus destitute of cement, present?
47289	In the name of God, Mr. Speaker, what grounds had he for this presumption?
47289	In the name of common sense, how can this be true?
47289	In this view can you be prepared for war at the expiration of the embargo?
47289	In this way, I grant, our conduct may be impartial; but what has become of our American rights to navigate the ocean?
47289	In what are these ten millions of dollars to be collected?
47289	In what condition do they leave the country, which, eight years since,"in the full tide of successful experiment,"fell into their hands?
47289	In what do they differ, to their advantage from other felons?
47289	In what does it consist?
47289	In what does your export to that region consist?
47289	In what mode, or by what_ means_ are they to be effected?
47289	In what respect, then, are they to be compared to Aaron Burr?
47289	In what school had these illustrious men formed those noble principles of civil liberty asserted by their eloquence and maintained by their arms?
47289	In what situation would she have stood in relation to the United States?
47289	In what situation would you then place some of the best men of the nation?
47289	In what way are we bound again to launch our country into this dark sea of restriction; surrounded on all sides with perils and penalties?
47289	In what way will the public coffers be filled?
47289	In what will this Government consist?
47289	Indeed, sir, and in what respect is it entitled to this definition of self- evident?
47289	Independently of the obvious propriety of this proceeding in itself, have we, sir, no examples of the course of conduct recommended by the resolution?
47289	Is Canada so far conquered that you can now reduce the term of enlistment?
47289	Is Great Britain less powerful now, than she was twenty years ago?
47289	Is Napoleon our king?
47289	Is a question of construction never to be at rest?
47289	Is all this trade of no importance to trading people?
47289	Is another brood of"restrictive"harpies, more unseemly and more hungry than their predecessors, to be let loose among them?
47289	Is any advantage to be derived from complaining of this?
47289	Is any disposition evidenced to omit tearing them from their homes and families in future?
47289	Is any gentleman prepared to say a smaller penalty will effect the object?
47289	Is commerce to be protected by abridging the natural rights of the people?
47289	Is he a man of truth?
47289	Is it a fact, that greater injuries exist from France than from Great Britain?
47289	Is it a land force?
47289	Is it a restoration of French property seized under the law of non- intercourse?
47289	Is it a want of capacity?
47289	Is it admitted that the British fleet secures her from attack?
47289	Is it an enjoyment of our rights, or a direct, full submission?
47289	Is it because the British officers impress from our vessels others besides natives?
47289	Is it because you have power on your side, sir, that you will not submit to a judicial decision of this question?
47289	Is it by merely reviving the law of May last, as is the object of this amendment?
47289	Is it calculated to produce this effect?
47289	Is it come to this, that a law constitutionally enacted, even after a formal decision in favor of its constitutionality, can not be enforced?
47289	Is it denied that the Government can take property from an individual, making him compensation therefor?
47289	Is it equal and exact justice to those two nations?
47289	Is it extinct?
47289	Is it for the benefit of the great mass of the American people?
47289	Is it for the honor of the nation to remove the embargo, without taking any other measure, and to bear with every indignity?
47289	Is it for the honor or happiness of this nation that we should again pass under the yoke of Great Britain?
47289	Is it from his past treatment of us?
47289	Is it from the correspondence in the genius of the two governments?
47289	Is it indeed guilty to defend our country?
47289	Is it lost to this nation?
47289	Is it necessary as a measure of self- defence, as the only mode of resistance which will bring England to terms?
47289	Is it necessary for me at this time of day to make a declaration of the principles of the Republican party?
47289	Is it necessary for me to allude to the reduction of the Army-- to say by whom it was made?
47289	Is it necessary for me to descant upon the topics of difference which then separated the two great parties in the Government?
47289	Is it necessary to show that the right which was exclusive during the patent, is now the common right of all?
47289	Is it not a convenient agent for paying and receiving money?
47289	Is it not a spirit of war?
47289	Is it not admitted that we may lawfully exclude or admit the vessels of both belligerents?
47289	Is it not an abandonment of those rights to which we are entitled?
47289	Is it not an exclusive privilege secured to the stockholders of this bank?
47289	Is it not for the purpose of promoting"the general welfare"of the nation which we represent?
47289	Is it not important that the men who live on the seaboard should know that we have a force to repel attack?
47289	Is it not known that all the surplus product of the agriculture of this country finds its vent on the Continent of Europe?
47289	Is it not known that, of the whole of our tobacco, seven out of eight parts are consumed on the continent?
47289	Is it not obvious that England will not comply with her part of the condition, and that the Emperor never expected that she would?
47289	Is it not obvious, from the very terms of the letter, that it contains a condition that the repeal is a qualified one?
47289	Is it not presumable that the President would choose to have some communication with our Ministers abroad before the meeting of Congress?
47289	Is it not rewarding the perfidy of the one at the expense of the other, and at the expense of ourselves?
47289	Is it not surprising, then, that we are called upon to give him the approbation of this House?
47289	Is it not then our duty, as guardians of the public interest, to provide this powerful, this necessary means of defence?
47289	Is it not these acts which have shut us out from a market?
47289	Is it nothing to us to extinguish the torch that lights up savage warfare?
47289	Is it on similarity of language?
47289	Is it on the ocean that the impression is to be made?
47289	Is it possible such doctrine should be advocated on the floor of Congress?
47289	Is it possible that such a declaration could be deemed orthodox when proceeding from lips so unholy as those of an excommunicant from that church?
47289	Is it possible that this Government will sanction such arbitrary practices?
47289	Is it pretended to enter into any stipulations with Great Britain as to our conduct?
47289	Is it right to take from one part of the community ten millions of dollars and put it into the hands of another part?
47289	Is it so believed by the Administration?
47289	Is it that of a nation keen to discern, and strong to resist, violations of its sovereignty?
47289	Is it to be imagined that a power so vast would have been left by the wisdom of the constitution to doubtful inference?
47289	Is it to be supposed that the people of the United States will agree to this?
47289	Is it to our advantage to be excluded from the trade of the continent?
47289	Is it to secure the independence of the people, to suffer a foreign nation to impose upon them any terms which it thinks proper?
47289	Is it to tell us she never will redress our wrongs; or is it to divert us from a prosecution of our rights?
47289	Is it to the interest of the Administration that these abuses should continue, and that loans and taxes should be resorted to to cover them?
47289	Is it to walk about this earth, to breathe this air, and to partake the common blessings of God''s providence?
47289	Is it unjust to continue the war, till this demand is complied with?
47289	Is it want of pecuniary or want of physical capacity?
47289	Is it, that we have suffered the non- intercourse law to expire?
47289	Is it_ Le Roi s''avisera_?
47289	Is no respect due to the opinions of our predecessors?
47289	Is not a bank a proper place for the deposit and safe- keeping of money-- more so than the custom- house?
47289	Is not every office in law called a franchise or a particular privilege?
47289	Is not the authority of the marshals competent to the execution of the laws?
47289	Is not the course a just and necessary one?
47289	Is not the income of every man impaired?
47289	Is not the war- worn soldier calling on us every day with his demands?
47289	Is not this a consideration that ought to be taken into account?
47289	Is not this feature modelled after the feature in the Government of England?
47289	Is not this proof that the merchants did not consider the risk very great?
47289	Is not this sufficient to induce us to take away from Governors this prerogative?
47289	Is not, then, the exemption from these liabilities an important immunity?
47289	Is such an act calculated to induce the belief that the embargo operates as a bounty on British trade?
47289	Is that a consideration to have no weight upon such a question as this?
47289	Is that a fact?
47289	Is that a mere idle discussion?
47289	Is the Administration for negotiation?
47289	Is the American nation ready to bow the neck?
47289	Is the Executive to infer from the proviso that something exists in the law which the friends of the proviso declare does not exist?
47289	Is the Secretary of the President of the United States knocking at the door for admittance?
47289	Is the South of easier access than the North, and is the circle of hostility to be extended to that quarter?
47289	Is the embargo submission?
47289	Is the enemy at the gate?
47289	Is the gentleman who represents that district( Mr. SEYBERT) willing that they shall absolve themselves from their contract by enlisting in the Army?
47289	Is the gentleman willing to surrender the carrying trade to Great Britain?
47289	Is the last effort to preserve the peace of the nation, to be abandoned from these considerations?
47289	Is the minority thus to be dragooned into this measure?
47289	Is the new and before unheard- of system of blockade abandoned?
47289	Is the object of this bill to promote science or the useful arts?
47289	Is the power to create this paper medium, or national currency, an attribute of State or national sovereignty?
47289	Is the removal of the non- importation act, and the admission of British vessels, nothing?
47289	Is then a refraining from so doing, submission?
47289	Is there a land upon the globe so fair, so happy, and so free?
47289	Is there a man who hears us who has not experienced its utility?
47289	Is there any liberty left among the people of France, or of those countries that France has conquered?
47289	Is there any limitation to the law on the statute book?
47289	Is there any probability that there will be any?
47289	Is there any probability, the slightest indication, that it will answer?
47289	Is there any provision in the constitution directing it?
47289	Is there any provision now made?
47289	Is there any thing in the last communication from the President, calculated to produce such an effect?
47289	Is there any thing yet wanting to fill up the full measure of injustice you have sustained?
47289	Is there no danger that we shall become enervated by the spirit of avarice, unfortunately so predominant?
47289	Is there no difference between protecting an existing right, and taking away a right from one party for the purpose of vesting it in another party?
47289	Is there no difference in the price under these circumstances?
47289	Is there not in this some proof that the evil has been magnified?
47289	Is there not time, I beseech you, gentlemen, to proceed in the regular mode to the election of our officers?
47289	Is there, indeed, a physical impossibility of removing them?
47289	Is this a justification for such an atrocious and exorbitant grasp at power?
47289	Is this a novel doctrine, either as to time, or the nation who now attempts to enforce it?
47289	Is this an honest neutrality?
47289	Is this coincidence of members, this exclusively Federal petitioning, no mark of party?
47289	Is this embargo what it pretends to be-- preparation for war?
47289	Is this great continent and the free millions who inhabit it, again to become appendages of the British Crown?
47289	Is this measure no abridgment of their rights?
47289	Is this no argument for reduction?
47289	Is this republican?
47289	Is this the period of all others to be selected to incorporate unmeaning laws in the body of your statute book?
47289	Is your course along the highway of nations unobstructed?
47289	It appears to be limited to sixty days; at the expiration of that time will any one say we shall be prepared for war?
47289	It had been asked, why was the country unprepared for defence?
47289	It has been asked whether the embargo has not operated more on the United States than on the European Powers?
47289	It has been rejected by France, and rejected by England after an expense of hundreds of thousands of dollars-- and now are we to take it up?
47289	It is asked of us, why admit the vessels of France, whilst injuries which she has done us are unatoned for?
47289	It was possible, but was it probable that any event would occur to alter our situation for the better?
47289	It was then read a third time; and on the question, Shall the bill pass?
47289	It would rise, on a removal of the embargo, to ten or twelve dollars; and how long would that price last?
47289	Let me ask him, if Administration should not take this course, whether it would not be perfectly proper that Congress should be in session?
47289	Let me ask if an American vessel under it can go to any port of France?
47289	Let me ask if it be not better to admit them?
47289	Let me ask the gentleman who asked that question, what mighty good our Army has done by land?
47289	Let me ask who will buy them when put into the market?
47289	Let me ask you, sir, what else he did, or could intend?
47289	Let me ask, what will be your export while that war continues?
47289	Let me ask, which have we placed in the best situation, France or England?
47289	Let me, therefore, inquire, in what this horrible act of substitution, as Mr. Jackson would make it appear, consists?
47289	Man is frail, and why should not, at times of public agitation and concussion of parties, abuses arise?
47289	May I not trust their confutation to that general knowledge of the subject which every member of the House possesses?
47289	May we not cherish this sentiment, without presumption, when we reflect on the characters by which this war was distinguished?
47289	May we not, in time, have the whole of South America, some of the West India islands, and, possibly, Great Britain?
47289	Mr. Chairman, is it for an infant nation, or a popular Government, to be deterred by the want of preparation?
47289	Mr. D. asked if the nation was to be saved by long speeches?
47289	Mr. MACON asked under what clause of the constitution Captain Murray and others had been remunerated?
47289	Mr. STANFORD said:--Mr. Speaker, I would ask if my colleague''s motion of amendment can be in order?
47289	Mr. Speaker, are we to be thus amused?
47289	Mr. Speaker, can any argument be more conclusive?
47289	Mr. Speaker, what would be your conduct on such an occasion?
47289	Mr. Speaker: What is this liberty of which so much is said?
47289	Must I not, then, deplore the feebleness of voice, the want of force, of manner, and promptness of mind and thought, which limit me?
47289	Must the best interests of the nation be put to hazard to save him the mortification of acknowledging his error and retracing his steps?
47289	My colleague( Mr. CLAY) has asked for the congeniality between a bank and the collection of our revenue?
47289	Need I remind you, said Mr. R., of the millions of victims sacrificed to commercial cupidity on the plains of Hindostan, by means of this navy?
47289	Need I say any thing further on the subject?
47289	Need I undertake to prove that, from the moment Whitney''s patent expired, his exclusive right ceased to exist?
47289	No doubt, sir, when the embargo is taken off, a momentary spur will be given to exportation; but how long will it continue?
47289	No; it has the ability, that is admitted; but will it not have the disposition?
47289	No; it was intended by this bounty to make us a great commercial people; and shall we ungratefully reject the enjoyment of his unexampled beneficence?
47289	Now I would ask, whether it is probable, that the British subjects would be willing to lend us money to carry on war against their sovereign?
47289	Now suppose we should look over our former exports to this island in any one year, what should we find the amount to be?
47289	Now the questions which result are, has the act been done?
47289	Now what is proposed by denying a renewal of the United States''Bank charter?
47289	Now, I ask, if they dare not resort to a direct tax, excise laws, and stamp acts, where will they obtain money?
47289	Now, he asked, whether men who had any regard to national honor would consent to navigate the ocean on terms so disgraceful?
47289	Now, if it became a State, would not all right of negotiation on the subject be taken from the President?
47289	Now, is not here an essential right to be alienated?
47289	Now, is there any reason to suppose that the contingent expenses of our navy would be greater in proportion to its force than this?
47289	Now, sir, I ask when we have made this country a State if we can do this?
47289	Now, sir, after thus stripping this extraordinary sentence of all its disguises, and translating it into plain English, to what does it amount?
47289	Now, sir, as to the non- intercourse system-- how does that operate?
47289	Now, sir, did this decree exist at the time of its date?
47289	Now, that the State which the gentleman represents is almost in arms against us?
47289	Now, what is the fact?
47289	Now, what reliance could be placed on this patriotism?
47289	Now, when a vile spirit of party has gone abroad and distracted the Union?
47289	Of what avail is the proclamation of the Prince Regent in this country, ordering the British subjects home?
47289	Of what consequence is it to us what way the Gottenburg merchant disposes of our products, after he has paid us our price?
47289	Of what materials will this army be composed?
47289	Of what nature are the rights in contest?
47289	On commercial intercourse?
47289	On the question, Shall the bill be read a third time as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall the bill pass to the third reading as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill be engrossed and read a third time as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill be engrossed and read a third time as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill be engrossed and read a third time as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass as amended?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass?
47289	On the question, Shall this bill pass?
47289	On the question, Shall this resolution pass?
47289	On the question,"Shall this bill be engrossed and read a third time, as amended?"
47289	On the question: Shall this bill pass to a third reading, as amended?
47289	On the subject of impressments, for which alone the war is now to be continued, what, let me ask, is the principle for which our Government contends?
47289	On the subject of maritime law, has he not stated things which before were unheard of?
47289	On what does the ability of a nation depend?
47289	On what ground can this discrimination be defended?
47289	On what ground does this rest?
47289	On what principle is it that British ships were first excluded and on which their exclusion was confirmed by the non- intercourse law?
47289	On what, sir, is the honor of this nation now suspended?
47289	Or against England, who, with the monopoly of commerce which you leave her to enjoy, has no object further to annoy you?
47289	Or by what right do we create a military school?
47289	Or does the obligation of friendship exist on the part of the United States alone?
47289	Or in what section of the Union does the gentleman presume to say the American people will not submit to the law?
47289	Or is he the President of the United States?
47289	Or is he to get that information from inofficial sources?
47289	Or is it there our seamen are held in captivity?
47289	Or was it ever contended that had not the embargo been raised, the terms of Jay''s treaty would have been worse?
47289	Or was the Administration conducted in such a manner as to make the firmness and patriotism of the nation itself doubted abroad?
47289	Or, are we to tantalize their hopes with energy in one law and imbecility in another?
47289	Or, if it be one of those unmeaning propositions, the discussion of which could answer no good to this House?
47289	Ought it not, then, to follow, that the rights of those employed on land or water should also be inseparable?
47289	Ought the impending calamities to be left to the hazard of a contingent remedy?
47289	Ought we not to relieve its anxieties?
47289	Ought we, sir, to depend upon these men to man our fleets, or to defend our ports and harbors?
47289	Our privateers; will they have no effect on Great Britain?
47289	Pay tribute-- for what?
47289	Permit me here to endeavor to illustrate my idea by a reference to the constitution itself?
47289	Permit me to ask, how has it been ascertained that a bank is necessary to the operations of the Government?
47289	Permit me to inquire of that gentleman whether he ever saw a law authorizing one man to give another his promissory note?
47289	Permit me to inquire, in the first place, how the object of the constitution may be attained?
47289	Porter,"Free trade and sailor''s rights,"617; is there a man doubts the war was justly undertaken?
47289	Public property; and what species?
47289	Put down this bank, and how then are your revenues to be collected?
47289	Question 2--At what place was the conversation held?
47289	Question 3--Have you seen the members alluded to, or any of them, since you first appeared before this committee on Saturday last?
47289	Question by the committee-- From the conversation of what members did you collect the information of which you have spoken?
47289	Question, shall the Senate adhere to their amendments?
47289	Question-- Do you know where Henry is now?
47289	Respectable merchants, I observe, form a part of the bank deputies-- for what?
47289	Retain the qualified veto, and take away the power to prorogue and dissolve, and what will be the consequence?
47289	Reverse this picture, admitting that you have a war with Great Britain, what will be its consequences?
47289	SIR: Before I reply to your question,"how many major generals and brigadiers are necessary for an army of thirty- five thousand men?"
47289	Say thirty- five, and you add twenty, making together fifty- five: what use is there in multiplying regiments without men?
47289	Say, if you please, that you had those ships built, could you send them to sea?
47289	Seamen, who shall be attached by every tie to this country, and on whom we can depend for its defence in time of danger?
47289	Shall I be obliged by a laborious process of reasoning to prove the obligation of Government to rescue him from such suffering?
47289	Shall I be pardoned, sir, when I fear our vessels will only tend to swell the present catalogue of the British navy?
47289	Shall I be told the President had discovered that the blockade had been"avowed to be comprehended in, and identified with, the orders in council?"
47289	Shall I not attempt to arrest your progress in the path where lies a serpent that will sting you to death?
47289	Shall it again be held, in its orbit by the attractive, the corruptive influence of the petty island of Great Britain?
47289	Shall it lie unproductive in the public vaults?
47289	Shall negotiation be spun out further?
47289	Shall the majority govern, or shall a few wicked and abandoned men drive this nation from the ground it has taken?
47289	Shall the nation give way to an opposition of a few, and those the most profligate part of the community?
47289	Shall the revenue be reduced?
47289	Shall this bill pass to a third reading as amended?
47289	Shall we after this be told that Congress can not constitutionally exercise any right by implication?
47289	Shall we always shrink from the contest?
47289	Shall we always yield?
47289	Shall we exclude both, admit both, or discriminate?
47289	Shall we have companies without captains, or shall the United States pay for two captains?
47289	Shall we sit here with our arms folded until the enemy is at our gates?
47289	Shall we then abandon commerce, or shall we strive to support it?
47289	Shall we then believe the one and not the other?
47289	Shall we thereby secure our commercial rights?
47289	Shall we turn a deaf ear to the claims of individuals upon Government because of this statute?
47289	Shall we vindicate our independence at the expense of our social or moral obligations?
47289	Shall we, by their conquest, obtain the objects for which this war is waged?
47289	Shall we, sir, continue the war for these men?
47289	Shall we, then, by passing this resolution, sanction an idea that Lieutenant- Colonel Washington was entitled to more respect than others?
47289	Shall we, then, utter this libel on the nation?
47289	Should France have been selected?
47289	Sir, are we to continue in this state any longer?
47289	Sir, can men thus situated, solvent as they ought to be ten times over, find relief from the State banks?
47289	Sir, have I moved you a nauseous, sickening resolution, stuffed with adulation?
47289	Sir, have we no rights to defend?
47289	Sir, have we not been for years contending against the tyranny of the ocean?
47289	Sir, how is this to be done?
47289	Sir, if simplicity was not originally contemplated by the framers of the constitution, why the imposition on the people in publishing it to the world?
47289	Sir, if this be the fact, of whom does this wealthy population consist?
47289	Sir, is it possible that Congress can so far forget their duties to the people and their respect for themselves?
47289	Sir, shall I not be permitted to point to the yawning gulf beneath?
47289	Sir, what can gentlemen flatter themselves by suffering this discussion to be protracted to so unwarrantable a length?
47289	Sir, what has been the cause of our present condition?
47289	Sir, what in such a case would be true honor?
47289	Sir, what is the nature and import of this proclamation?
47289	Sir, what is this power we propose now to usurp?
47289	Sir, what sort of title is this?
47289	Sir, what would be the effect of passing by unnoticed these gross and insidious insults to both the people and Government?
47289	Sir, where is your commerce now to protect?
47289	Sir, will not the same reasoning apply against the maritime towns being taxed to support the army of 10,000 men in the West?
47289	Sir, will your money, when collected, be safe in the State banks?
47289	Sir, without indulging in vague conjectures, what are the best data we have to form an estimate of the amount of specie in the country?
47289	Sir, would Great Britain rely for her oracles on the newspapers or pamphlets of this country?
47289	Sixty thousand?
47289	So far from it, would not the danger of French influence be resounded throughout the nation?
47289	Some gentlemen indulge great expectations from privateers; but has Great Britain any unarmed or unprotected trade which they can attack?
47289	Strip the proposition, and what language does it speak?
47289	Suppose an attack upon any portion of the American army within the acknowledged limits of the United States by a Spanish force?
47289	Suppose an attempt to subvert this Government, would not the traitor first aim, by force or corruption, to acquire the treasure of this company?
47289	Suppose it ours, are we any nearer to our point?
47289	Suppose that the whole fine in any particular case had been paid by individual subscription, what has the Government to do with that?
47289	Suppose these men had been arrested and tried in this country, what would have been their lot?
47289	Suppose they should neglect or refuse to make these appointments, can you compel them to do it?
47289	Suppose this expectation disappointed-- suppose the harbor of New York blockaded by two seventy- fours?
47289	Suppose you make this transmission once, can you do it a second time?
47289	Surely; and yet we pay annually a tribute for permission to do it-- and why?
47289	Surrender your independence-- for what?
47289	Take a landsman on board a ship, and what sort of a sailor will he make?
47289	Take off the embargo, they cry-- for what?
47289	Take, then, the population of Canada to be 300,000 souls; what number of militia should this population furnish?
47289	Tell me, said he, what is to keep a great proportion of them from your coast in 1813?
47289	That is out of the question; then, the only question is, whether in the present state of the world, the embargo or war is the best for us?
47289	That of our cotton, at least one- half finds its market there?
47289	That she can admit that we have her always perfectly in our power?
47289	That the gentlemen on the other side of the House were divided on that subject, as they were upon the question of the reduction of the Navy?
47289	That they should expend large sums of money for the purpose of buying them out?
47289	That we should repel insults and respect ourselves?
47289	That, because we can not submit to the edicts of the belligerents, we will therefore open a free trade with them?
47289	That, under the pretext of a purchase from an Indian, named Double Head, people have gone over to settle lands, is true; but from where?
47289	The Orders in Council-- and what were they worth to him?
47289	The SPEAKER inquired whether Mr. G. yielded the floor?
47289	The SPEAKER then decided that the main question to now put, was:"Will the House concur with the Senate in the amendments made to the bill?"
47289	The amendments made by the House having been agreed to, the question was stated, Shall the bill be engrossed, and read a third time?
47289	The avowed principle is retaliation, but is it the true principle?
47289	The basis of all commerce is calculation; what calculation can be found for distant enterprises when the data are perpetually shifting?
47289	The commerce of that city, which exists only by commerce, destroyed?
47289	The committee rose and reported the bill without amendment, and the question was, Shall it be engrossed for a third reading?
47289	The gentleman from Kentucky( Mr. CLAY) asked, if banks are necessary for collecting the public revenues, why give them any other power?
47289	The gentleman from Pennsylvania asked yesterday, why not repeal the embargo laws, and provide for the enforcement of this system by a new law?
47289	The gentleman had appealed to the House to know why they would retain them?
47289	The gentleman says, suppose they were to return to their country, would they not be punished?
47289	The great subject for the contemplation of every reflecting mind in America was, what that remedy should be?
47289	The inquiry has been made, with some solicitude, what will you do with_ naturalized foreigners_?
47289	The majority now stand on high ground-- what will be said, and what will be the consequence of a refusal?
47289	The merchants?
47289	The negotiation opens, and what is done?
47289	The only question is, do they cease to violate our neutral commerce?
47289	The only question that presents itself is, Is the information useful to us?
47289	The press is groaning with pamphlets-- for what?
47289	The proceeding was unanimous; and what benefit did the British nation receive from this unanimous and prompt proceeding?
47289	The proper extent of the discussion growing out of this bill seemed to be confined to these inquiries: Can the force contemplated be obtained?
47289	The protection of the General Government claimed?
47289	The question is, Has he told the truth?
47289	The question is, how many marines are necessary, and in what battles are they employed?
47289	The question is, what regulation shall we make respecting public ships, and one of three courses is to be pursued?
47289	The question is, what should be done?
47289	The question ought always to be, What becomes the nation?
47289	The question then arises, what, under these circumstances, ought the officers and crew to be allowed?
47289	The question then presents itself, has Congress the power to divest the people of that right?
47289	The question was stated thus:"Is the decision of the SPEAKER correct?"
47289	The question was then taken--"Shall the amendments be engrossed, and, together with the bill, be read a third time?"
47289	The question was then, on what day shall it be read?
47289	The question which at once presents itself to every mind disposed to inquire, is, what is the object of this vast military force?
47289	The question"Shall the bill be engrossed for a third reading?"
47289	The right of not being vexed or endangered by paper blockades?
47289	The said bill was, accordingly, read the third time: Whereupon, Mr. SPEAKER stated the question from the chair, that the same do pass?
47289	The second object, which should never for a moment escape attention, Can the law be executed?
47289	The ship owners, the East and West India merchants, and what cause have they for war?
47289	The spoliation of your property?
47289	The true question is not, Is the matter expressed in this abstract proposition true?
47289	The violation of the personal liberty of your citizens and the degradation of the ensign of your sovereignty?
47289	The whole estate or my moiety only?
47289	Then the question results, has Congress a right, in order to determine its title, to refer it to any tribunal whatever?
47289	Then, to my mind, the only question is, shall we defend ourselves, or shall we submit?
47289	There ought to be no question as to what stock they sprung from; the true question was, ought they to be a State?
47289	They ask where are the men-- where is the money to be obtained?
47289	They asked--"What do we want of Canada?
47289	They complained of the first embargo; what did they get?
47289	They have been delivered to you by my honorable colleague-- what are they?
47289	They were gaining strength daily, and what was the situation of our Southern borders?
47289	They were repealed, finally, in consequence-- of what?
47289	Thirty thousand?
47289	This being the case, who would now be most likely to be supplied with it?
47289	This decree did not exist; and why was it not issued?
47289	This decree purports to be an act of reprisal on this country, and for what cause?
47289	This heaped up measure of legislative contumely is prepared; for whom?
47289	Through the medium of the State banks?
47289	To break up your infant manufactories, and to deprive poor children at once of a useful employment, and a home?
47289	To defeat the passage of this bill?
47289	To promote the public good or advance the national prosperity?
47289	To protect the constituents of my worthy colleague, in the enjoyment of their peace of mind?
47289	To provide no protection against smaller powers?
47289	To such favored beings what would be the suggestions of love, truly parental?
47289	To the Baltic, sir?
47289	To what is it owing that we are at this moment deliberating under the forms of a free representative government?
47289	To what purpose do we keep up the Marines, another branch of the Establishment?
47289	To what was our superiority owing?
47289	To whom will you confide the charge of leading the flower of our youth to the Heights of Abraham?
47289	Under all these circumstances was it wise and prudent to discharge the Navy?
47289	Under such circumstances is it not to be expected that this measure of the Executive will result in war?
47289	Under such circumstances, what should hurry us into the war?
47289	Under these circumstances what ought I to do?
47289	Under these circumstances, Mr. R. asked the House if it were not necessary for a committee to be appointed to probe into this business?
47289	Under this grant, Congress can pass laws to carry into effect the powers vested in the judicial department?
47289	Under what clause money paid into the Treasury had been returned in various instances?
47289	Upon meeting with this gentleman he inquired of me what had been done?
47289	Upon what ground, then, sir, is it that we are called on to pass this additional non- importation act against Great Britain?
47289	Upon whom are they dependent for legal existence and for length of days?
47289	Virginia has the physical force, but has she a moral right to violate the Constitution of the United States?
47289	War has been declared by a law of the land; and what would be thought of similar attempts to defeat any other law, however inconsiderable its object?
47289	Was Holland ruined by her navy?
47289	Was any nation ever less prepared for war?
47289	Was ever any body of men so cruelly wounded in the house of their friend?
47289	Was he expected to answer this question?
47289	Was he to set at defiance the law of the land?
47289	Was it believed that the gentleman from Pennsylvania( Mr. SMILIE) was disposed to submit to the belligerents?
47289	Was it competent, he asked, to the Government to receive as testimony the statement of the commander or crew of an American corsair?
47289	Was it for the purpose of destroying the Government?
47289	Was it for this the martyrs of the Revolution died?
47289	Was it not for want of unanimity in support of the measure?
47289	Was it not in consequence of its having been wantonly, shamefully, and infamously violated?
47289	Was it not, he asked, infinitely absurd and a direct violation of the constitution, to apportion the representation before these numbers were known?
47289	Was it obtained_ bona fide_ for a fair and full consideration?
47289	Was it proposed now to declare war?
47289	Was it so considered by the Republicans, when resorted to for redress against the primary violations in 1793?
47289	Was it such a repeal as the gentleman contends ought to have taken place of the Berlin and Milan decrees, viz: under the sign manual of the Emperor?
47289	Was it taken from an impression which had gone abroad in the country?
47289	Was it that the members of that Army should sheath their swords in the bowels of the liberties of their country?
47289	Was it then for the first time, that a division of sentiment appeared on this floor?
47289	Was not the President, in good faith, bound to believe the fact, and, believing it, bound to act as he did?
47289	Was not the first vessel which ever doubled the Cape of Good Hope, under the flag of the United States, the old frigate Alliance?
47289	Was not the royal family decoyed by artifice from Madrid to Bayonne?
47289	Was the President of the United States presumed to have turned a deaf ear to the cries of our suffering countrymen in captivity in a foreign nation?
47289	Was the batture ceded to the United States?
47289	Was the embargo principle considered submission in the days of the stamp act?
47289	Was the fact so?
47289	Was the gentleman from Maryland( Mr. KEY) who represented the adjacent district, in the same belligerent temper?
47289	Was the letter of Mr. Erskine a repeal of the British orders?
47289	Was the right of the citizen to fall prostrate before such an_ ex parte_ opinion or statement as that might be?
47289	Was there not some difficulty, under the proclamation, in the admission of the Statira frigate, bearing that Minister into our waters?
47289	Was this a necessary of life without which they could not subsist?
47289	Was this an avowed object in the Convention when it formed this article?
47289	Was this blockade such a violation of the neutral rights of the United States as to come decidedly within the act of the last session?
47289	Was this body calculated for that branch of Government?
47289	Was this the ground on which the subject was placed?
47289	We are farther told that impressment of seamen was not considered a sufficient cause of war; and are asked why should it be continued on that account?
47289	We are not only, sir, to ruin many innocent and unoffending individuals, but to derange the national finances; and for what is all this to be done?
47289	We are now going to war for the protection of these rights; but in what way, and under what circumstances?
47289	We are, sir, in a state of war; and what is evidently the course which we should pursue whilst in that situation?
47289	We asked, What were the emoluments?
47289	We create a military school-- for what purpose?
47289	We have been asked, Mr. Speaker, why not lay upon your table a proposition to go to war?
47289	We have been asked,"What are some of the small States when compared with the Mississippi Territory?"
47289	We lay an embargo-- is there any clause in the constitution authorizing us to lay embargoes?
47289	We say we will not trade-- with whom?
47289	We take off the embargo, and trade on their terms; what will be the consequence?
47289	Well, sir, how does she dispose of it?
47289	Well, sir, how was this miracle brought about?
47289	Well, sir, if the bank promptly calls in its loan of four hundred thousand dollars, will the debtors be enabled to meet their payments?
47289	Well, sir, was there ever a crisis calling on a people for vigorous exertions more awful than that which impends over us now?
47289	Well, sir, what then?
47289	Well, what then, say my friends?
47289	Well, what then?
47289	Were I to affirm the House is now in session, would it be reasonable to ask for proof?
47289	Were ever a body of men so abandoned in the hour of need, as the American Cabinet, in this instance by Bonaparte?
47289	Were gentlemen willing to submit to this: to raise the embargo, and subject our trade to this depredation?
47289	Were not parties arrayed against each other in 1796 on the subject of the British Treaty, and in 1798-''9, on the question of a war with France?
47289	Were not the disputes in this House, in those times, as long and as bitter as they have ever been since?
47289	Were the islands starved during these years?
47289	Were these people to be starved out, when they could actually purchase cheaper now from other places than they had formerly done from us?
47289	Were they to have resisted, and how?
47289	Were we more regardful of the property than the personal liberty of the citizen?
47289	Were we not to resist Great Britain because of her 1,130 sail of armed vessels?
47289	Were we to redress those wrongs, those commercial injuries, on the land?
47289	Were you able in the summer to recruit your army of twenty- five thousand men, could it be employed in any service in the course of this year?
47289	What State would have adopted the constitution, if it had been foreseen that this power would be granted to any man, however distinguished by office?
47289	What accounts did he bring?
47289	What advantage are my constituents to derive from the expenditure of this money?
47289	What advantage have we derived from it?
47289	What are a few seaport towns-- enterprising, wealthy, and prosperous, as indeed they are-- what are they, compared to my continental system?"
47289	What are his doctrines?
47289	What are our preparations for war?
47289	What are some of the legal effects of this incorporation?
47289	What are statutes of limitation as applicable to individual cases?
47289	What are the reasons for vesting Congress with the right to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several States?
47289	What are they?
47289	What are they?
47289	What are you about to do-- to breathe vigor and energy into the bill?
47289	What becomes of the immense revenues derived from those sources?
47289	What better mode could have been adopted, to prevent Indian hostility and intercept British supplies of the instruments of massacre?
47289	What but pillage, insult, and scorn?
47289	What can resuscitate wheat devoured by the fly?
47289	What cause of complaint has Denmark, or ever had Denmark, against us?
47289	What cause, Mr. Chairman, which existed for declaring the war has been removed?
47289	What change, sir, has occurred in the state of things to produce this strange impossibility?
47289	What claim has the Spanish Government upon our moderation and forbearance?
47289	What crime has been left undone?
47289	What did she first dictate for remedying any complaint?
47289	What did they do?
47289	What did you in this instance?
47289	What do its terms necessarily include?
47289	What do they imply?
47289	What do we understand by regulating commerce?
47289	What does it still require?
47289	What does public economy require, but that every one should serve the Republic in that capacity in which he can be most useful?
47289	What does the Attorney- General state in his report?
47289	What does this prove?
47289	What earthly good can result from it?
47289	What effect do gentlemen expect that the embargo will have had in May?
47289	What effect has it produced on France?
47289	What effect has this measure produced on foreign nations?
47289	What evidence have we had since to give us a more favorable prospect, as it respects the revocation of the decrees?
47289	What fate befalls the agriculture of the South?
47289	What glory?
47289	What has Mr. Canning given you in return?
47289	What has become of that high Federal spirit which disdained to buy Louisiana?
47289	What has become of that vast amount of money?
47289	What has become of the newspaper called the Washington Federalist?
47289	What has been her conduct since we acquired Louisiana?
47289	What has been her conduct?
47289	What has he said?
47289	What have been the propositions heretofore made by our Government to Great Britain upon this subject?
47289	What have we done since?
47289	What have we gained?
47289	What have we here, in the estimate of last year?
47289	What have we to destroy this proof?
47289	What if the other Hull had commanded?
47289	What influence could the opinion of the Attorney- General have?
47289	What injuries have been received from France?
47289	What insults, what injuries had we not suffered?
47289	What is a corporation such as the bill contemplates?
47289	What is a just and necessary war?
47289	What is done with it at this epoch?
47289	What is due to the national honor?
47289	What is it that the youth has not to prepare, or when was it that a popular Government taxed itself with previous preparation?
47289	What is it to lead to?
47289	What is it we do for a license to go into the Mediterranean?
47289	What is necessary to sustain an elevated fitness of character and conduct in the nation?
47289	What is now the situation of affairs?
47289	What is that plan, and what are the objects in contemplation?
47289	What is the consequence?
47289	What is the declaration made to the British Minister at this place, by our Secretary of State, on this subject?
47289	What is the doctrine of my friend from Georgia?
47289	What is the effect of this double obligation?
47289	What is the expression of the British Envoy on which gentlemen rely, and on which they are about to sit down quietly under the vine and fig tree?
47289	What is the fact, admitting all that this person has said to be true?
47289	What is the fact?
47289	What is the import of this provision?
47289	What is the language they speak?
47289	What is the nature of the title set up by the gentleman from Vermont?
47289	What is the nature of this Government?
47289	What is the object of this language?
47289	What is the object of this vast military force?
47289	What is the plain language of this preamble?
47289	What is the proposition which he submits?
47289	What is the result of it?
47289	What is the situation of our country generally?
47289	What is the spirit that breathes in the five resolutions which have been adopted-- resolutions which were in entire accordance with my feelings?
47289	What is the state of British commerce at this time?
47289	What is the state of the bank in this city?
47289	What is the state of things alluded to?
47289	What is the state of trade between us and France?
47289	What is the subject- matter in dispute?
47289	What is this argument of infancy?
47289	What is this tribute?
47289	What is to fill your Treasury now, if the people can not sell their products?
47289	What limitation does it contain upon the power to raise and support armies?
47289	What limitation does the constitution contain upon the power to lay and collect taxes, imposts, duties, and excises?
47289	What loans, I ask, have Government ever received from the Bank of the United States?
47289	What maritime strength is it expedient to provide for the United States?
47289	What may be the effect, if you introduce either of these two principles into this bill?
47289	What misfortune so great as the loss of character?
47289	What more can you do?
47289	What must be the effect of such insinuations?
47289	What must be the inevitable consequence if this measure is suffered to go into effect?
47289	What must you do?
47289	What nation or individual ever reached that state?
47289	What nation, in so short a time, ever before ascended to such a height of commercial greatness?
47289	What new order of things has disqualified them for the enjoyment of liberty?
47289	What object could he have in view which should induce him to conclude an arrangement, except with full confidence of its being carried into effect?
47289	What offence has she committed against France?
47289	What power have we to negotiate about the territory of any of the States?
47289	What prohibits us from doing to England what England does to us?
47289	What prospect is there that the embargo will be removed?
47289	What reason could there be for enacting this law, if the principles of the law of 1807 were correct?
47289	What reason had been given for such a course?
47289	What regular trade can yield such profits on the outward and inward cargoes?
47289	What reply did the majority of Congress give to this train of reasoning?
47289	What republicanism is this?
47289	What resistance do they afford against their decrees or confiscation?
47289	What restore flour soured in the barrel?
47289	What restriction is to be found in it upon the right to provide and maintain a navy?
47289	What right has Britain to tyrannize on the ocean, and prescribe limits to our trade?
47289	What right, in the whole charter of our rights, has not at some time been abused?
47289	What rights, Mr. Chairman?
47289	What satisfaction has been received for your plundered property?
47289	What says France?
47289	What says it?
47289	What says the sarcastic British Minister?
47289	What shall we say of the_ French_ doctrine in relation to this subject of impressment?
47289	What sort of attack have we cause to expect?
47289	What the ability of its debtors to meet their engagements?
47289	What then is the inference from this state of the case?
47289	What then is the object of the opposition?
47289	What then results?
47289	What then was her situation?
47289	What then will be the consequence of passing this bill?
47289	What then would be the case?
47289	What then?
47289	What think you, sir?
47289	What though their cities offer no plunder?
47289	What though their conquest can yield no glory?
47289	What upon the right to declare war and make peace?
47289	What use has been made of it?
47289	What was our situation now?
47289	What was that case?
47289	What was the amount of the gentleman''s showing on this occasion?
47289	What was the case in 1798?
47289	What was the condition to be performed on the part of France?
47289	What was the consequence?
47289	What was the consequence?
47289	What was the consequence?
47289	What was the effect of our eloquent addresses, when colonies, placed at the foot of the British throne?
47289	What was the effect of this information?
47289	What was the fact as respected France?
47289	What was the fact in this case?
47289	What was the history of it?
47289	What was the leading object of the adoption of the Federal Constitution in the northern parts of the Union?
47289	What was the occupation of a Virginian wife-- her highest ambition?
47289	What was the offer made to our Government by the British Ministry?
47289	What was the policy of the ordinance, and what the object of its framers?
47289	What was the power of Venice and Genoa when they led the van of naval power?
47289	What was the situation of some branches of our commerce then?
47289	What was the situation of the slaveholding States?
47289	What was the vote then?
47289	What was then our condition?
47289	What was then our situation with those nations?
47289	What was there to mar success?
47289	What was this ground?
47289	What were the House about to do?
47289	What were the facts?
47289	What were the objects of the war?
47289	What were then the doctrines of the French Government?
47289	What were those measures?
47289	What were those that characterized its progress and termination?
47289	What were your preparations for the Revolutionary war, and when made?
47289	What will avail the activity or gallantry of your officers and seamen against such disparity of force?
47289	What will be the consequence of laying down our arms, of shrinking from our present attitude?
47289	What will be the consequence of such neglect?
47289	What will be the influence of such an institution on the Government, and the country at large?
47289	What will be the situation of this unhappy, misguided country?
47289	What will in this case become of your source of wealth in the Western country?
47289	What will the Government of Spain, Junta, King, or Governors of Spanish provinces to whom you apply, say to you on this subject?
47289	What will the gentleman discover, by examining the history of the period he referred to?
47289	What would an honest Dutchman in the West think of a man who kept as many stables as horses, and those of the most expensive construction, too?
47289	What would be inferred from this procedure?
47289	What would be said in a court of justice in a case of murder?
47289	What would be the effect of such a system in the present war?
47289	What would be the effect of this war upon ourselves?
47289	What would be the effects of war, the tocsin of which was for the first time sounded through the land?
47289	What would be the object of a war?
47289	What would be the situation of your seaports and their seafaring inhabitants?
47289	What would be the upshot?
47289	What would have been the situation of our cause in the Revolution, if, after the British successes in Jersey, we had desponded?
47289	What would have been thought of such conduct in the war of the Revolution?
47289	What would it have been for sixty, one hundred, or three hundred and sixty- five days past?
47289	What would then be the state of the Territorial Legislatures?
47289	What, I would ask, is the probable fact, as to the facilities which this bank will afford the Government in borrowing?
47289	What, Mr. President, is the nature of this title?
47289	What, Mr. Speaker, are we now called on to decide?
47289	What, have we a Minister abroad, and is he afraid or unwilling to make a proposition to the Government where he is resident?
47289	What, he asked of the House, was settled by the passage of this bill?
47289	What, he asked, was the extent of the country in question?
47289	What, said Mr. C, is this statute of limitations, which, whenever mentioned in this House, seems to make everybody tremble?
47289	What, said Mr. D., is the situation in which we are now placed?
47289	What, said Mr. M., will be the effect of a proposition for taxing salt in the country?
47289	What, said Mr. R., has been the situation of Great Britain in relation to Spain?
47289	What, sir, are, or have been its effects on Great Britain?
47289	What, sir, did gentlemen on this floor say was the purport of this note?
47289	What, sir, has been the practice of the British House of Commons?
47289	What, sir, has been the practice under this law?
47289	What, sir, have the other party done?
47289	What, sir, said Mr. M., would have become of Rome, had she desponded when Hannibal defeated her armies?
47289	What, sir, shall constitute cause of war?
47289	What, sir, was the avowed object of this war?
47289	What, sir, was the conduct of the British Parliament and nation upon that occasion?
47289	What, sir, was the object of that law?
47289	What, sir, were the circumstances under which that mission was despatched here?
47289	What, sir?
47289	What, then, had experience taught them on this subject?
47289	What, then, is the true construction of the Treaties of St. Ildefonso and of April, 1803, from whence our title is derived?
47289	What, then, is this case?
47289	What, then, let me ask, has changed the character of those people, that they are to be despised?
47289	What, then, was our situation when Congress met?
47289	What, then, were the causes of the war?
47289	When Bonaparte talks of the freedom of the seas, does he mean the same idea which we attach to these words when we use them?
47289	When Mr. Jefferson, that illustrious character, presided over the destinies of the United States, why was not this navy- building proposed?
47289	When Spain was the ally of France she was-- what?
47289	When an adjustment is made with one of those powers, what is your language?
47289	When did our coercive measures commence?
47289	When did that voracious monster ever disgorge the plunder he had once received into his insatiable maw?
47289	When did they begin; when, though they may have been varied in character, were they relaxed in degree, and when were they probably to cease?
47289	When gentlemen attempt to carry this measure, upon the ground of acquiescence or precedent, do they forget that we are not in Westminster Hall?
47289	When has England been at peace with all the world, since she became a great naval power?
47289	When he talks of the principles of maritime law, does he mean the same as we?
47289	When the country was in want of clothing, and could get it for one- fourth price from the British, what was the consequence?
47289	When you had differences with both the belligerents, what was your language?
47289	When, by the express letter of the instrument,"new States may be admitted,"and when Vermont, not mentioned in the Confederation, has been admitted?
47289	Whence but from that origin came all the blessings of life, so far as political privileges are concerned?
47289	Whence can the money be obtained?
47289	Whence comes it, that in the archives of this Assembly, we find copies of licenses given by the Executive power of the nation-- to do what?
47289	Whence could be the objection to Congress meeting at an earlier day?
47289	Whence did we derive a power to purchase Louisiana, and incorporate it with the good old United States?
47289	Whence does this gentleman derive the power of declaring an act of Congress not in force, declared by the President''s proclamation to be in force?
47289	Whence the inducement to urge the annulment of a blockade of France, when, if annulled, no American cargoes would obtain a market in any of her ports?
47289	Whence the power to make it an instrument of commerce?
47289	Whence was derived a power to pass a law laying an embargo without limitation?
47289	Whence, sir, do you get the right, whence do you derive the powers to erect custom- houses in the maritime districts of the United States?
47289	Where are her colonies into which we could carry our arms?
47289	Where are her ships?--where her commerce?
47289	Where are the navies of Sweden and Denmark?
47289	Where are they gone?
47289	Where are those rights when great maritime powers become belligerent?
47289	Where are we to come in contact with our enemy?
47289	Where can the necessary supply of cotton be procured?
47289	Where could we have carried on against her any of the operations of war?
47289	Where could we subjugate her provinces?
47289	Where do you expect to find regulations of commerce?
47289	Where does the remainder usually go?
47289	Where have you seen a National Bank, connected with the Government, which has not ultimately ruined the circulating medium of the nation?
47289	Where is Holland now?
47289	Where is it when Canada is mentioned?
47289	Where is that spirit which enforced a simple resolution of the old Congress, not then binding upon the people, as a law from Heaven?
47289	Where is that spirit which for this reason separated us from the nations of Europe?
47289	Where is the Macedonian phalanx, the opposition in Congress?
47289	Where is the Montgomery, or even the Arnold, or the Burr, who is to march to Point Levi?
47289	Where is the difference, sir?
47289	Where is the impost duty which has supported the Government, and sunk to a considerable degree the national debt?
47289	Where is the justice-- where the equality-- of such a provision?
47289	Where is the justice?
47289	Where is the limitation upon this power to set up corporations?
47289	Where is the necessity of a proviso if the law does not bear such a construction?
47289	Where is the proof that the Executive did not call for those powers?
47289	Where is your revenue then to come from?
47289	Where now is the Revolutionary hero to whom you are about to confide this sacred trust?
47289	Where shall we stop, said Mr. D., if we tread back on the steps of each other?
47289	Where was the necessity, they will tell you, of declaring that the Orders in Council will_ have been_ withdrawn?
47289	Where were they found?
47289	Where will be the boasted militia of the gentleman?
47289	Where will proof be found of a fact so disgraceful?
47289	Where will those supplies be drawn from?
47289	Where would it end if the House were now to make a solemn resolution approving of the conduct of the President?
47289	Where, sir, could we attack France?
47289	Where, then, is the ground of such an influence?
47289	Where, then, is the money to be found, or what has been done with it?
47289	Where, then, is the necessity for this bank?
47289	Where, then, will you protect your commerce?
47289	Whether Congress have the power by the constitution to renew the charter of the Bank of the United States?
47289	Whether it does not appear probable that at least one thousand of those contained in this list were impressed without even a plausible pretext?
47289	Whether we believe in all the rights which the French Emperor condescends to claim for us from the British, although he will not admit them himself?
47289	Which is best-- to keep them at home, to a certain loss and probable ruin, or adventure them abroad to a possible loss and highly probable gain?
47289	While we facilitate negotiations with the British, why should we embarrass and prevent the same with the French?
47289	While we throw wide open the door of negotiation to England, why should we shut it against France?
47289	Whilst these peaceful experiments are undergoing a trial, what is the conduct of the opposition?
47289	Who but Christophe and Petion?
47289	Who can bear the idea of our being obliged to burn or sink all the ships we may take away from the enemy, for fear of their being recaptured?
47289	Who could say them nay?
47289	Who denies it?
47289	Who ever pretended to believe in its efficacy?
47289	Who has not heard of the once formidable fleets of Venice and Genoa?
47289	Who is here that hears these words, but what approves the sentiment they contain?
47289	Who is properly the presiding officer in this case?
47289	Who is there, now, in this body who has not voted for the erection of a light- house?
47289	Who is this man, and where is he?
47289	Who is this war party?
47289	Who must suffer by it?
47289	Who then has been the first aggressor?
47289	Who was in possession of the land when the law passed?
47289	Who was there now to supply all these various colonies that used to be supplied by us?
47289	Who was to decide which was the correct one?
47289	Who were the members of our first Congress?
47289	Who were they?
47289	Who will become the purchasers-- Great Britain?
47289	Who will impute to this body so disgraceful a motive?
47289	Who will profit by it?
47289	Who would dare to avow an intention to defeat its operation?
47289	Who would step forward to rescue them from that punishment due to their crime if convicted by our own courts?
47289	Who, sir, are the true friends-- I do not speak of motives-- who in fact are the true friends of Administration?
47289	Who, sir, can estimate the complicated mischiefs of a depreciated paper currency, without specie for its redemption?
47289	Who, sir, will be most likely to avail himself of this privilege, or rather of this course?
47289	Who?
47289	Whose products, then, would Great Britain carry?
47289	Why are we partisans of either?
47289	Why are your Ministers now loitering in foreign Courts?
47289	Why do it, then?
47289	Why give to Congress the right to coin money and regulate its value?
47289	Why has it so happened that this necessity has never existed until the last session of Congress?
47289	Why has the gentleman shielded British instigation of their outrages?
47289	Why has the measure failed of expected success?
47289	Why invest it with a capital immense in amount, and sovereign in its control over the external and internal commerce of the country?
47289	Why is a judge, sworn to support the laws and constitution of the country, bound by a train of decisions contrary to his own opinions?
47289	Why is he impelled to shed our blood?
47289	Why is it out of order?
47289	Why keep them up at this place, whence they could not get out of the river perhaps in three weeks or a month?
47289	Why kiss the rod of iron which inflicts the stripes without a cause?
47289	Why legislate by halves?
47289	Why love her rulers?
47289	Why make the distinction in this instance?
47289	Why need they decide this business immediately?
47289	Why not, it was asked, wait for the actual census of the territory?
47289	Why not, sir?
47289	Why not?
47289	Why should our sympathies be awakened in favor of Spain?
47289	Why should such a power have been delegated?
47289	Why should they come here then?
47289	Why should we hurry into a war from which nothing but calamity can be expected?
47289	Why so many vexatious restrictions upon neutral trade, tending to destroy competition on our part in the continental markets?
47289	Why then is it, that we are called upon to make a new declaration of independence?
47289	Why then should they not be manned and put in readiness for service?
47289	Why then, in this awful crisis, shall we not look to the same quarter?
47289	Why then, sir, should we not have union, when it is so easy and efficacious a remedy for all our difficulties?
47289	Why this great cry about domestic manufactures?
47289	Why was he not hanged as a traitor?
47289	Why was not that mercy which is so pathetically called for bestowed on them by that tribunal before whom the case was examined?
47289	Why was the evidence of the repeal of the decrees withheld?
47289	Why were they not liberated?
47289	Why, and for what was the constitution made?
47289	Why, sir, do you think the merchants will believe that you really intend to go to war?
47289	Why, sir, does the gentleman disapprove of the President''s proclamation?
47289	Why, sir, is it strange?
47289	Why, sir, was justice so long delayed, and why was it at last obtained?
47289	Why, then, should it be condemned?
47289	Why, then, should it be now determined at all events to abandon this measure?
47289	Why, then, sir, shall he now affect not to understand us?
47289	Why, then, will gentlemen persist in that course where danger is almost unavoidable, and shun that where safety is almost certain?
47289	Will a navy have this effect?
47289	Will any gentleman regret that this twenty- six gun ship has been built, though the mastery of the Lakes has been acquired without it?
47289	Will gentlemen be good enough to condescend so far as to assign some object that the Executive could have had in view from such conduct?
47289	Will gentlemen suffer me to turn their attention to this last fact?
47289	Will gentlemen tell us from whence they are to procure the principal articles of provisions and lumber?
47289	Will he explain it?
47289	Will he pretend to say, that this is an offensive war; a war of conquest?
47289	Will it be less difficult or unpopular to do this after the debt has accumulated to an enormous amount?
47289	Will it be said, that when the arrangement was made with Mr. Erskine the President had no knowledge of the blockading orders of May, 1806?
47289	Will it come from the Eastward, in bills of the State banks?
47289	Will it compel the great belligerent Powers to do us justice for past injuries and secure us for the future?
47289	Will it contradict itself by taking away the seamen?
47289	Will it not be prudent to diminish the extent of this evil by putting down this bank which is the fountain from which the whole system flows?
47289	Will it then be asked, shall we not go to war and fight our way?
47289	Will not the alarm be increased by its continuance at this time?
47289	Will not the officer be also liable to the State laws?
47289	Will not the same causes produce the same effects now as then?
47289	Will she learn nothing from the loss of three or four hundred ships?
47289	Will she make no diversions in their favor?
47289	Will she suffer us to carry the war into her territories, and not retort upon us?
47289	Will she then respect our rights?
47289	Will the country be less able to repress insurrection?
47289	Will the gentleman say she values the principles of the Orders in Council, as she did the sovereignty of her colonies?
47289	Will the gentleman trust the merchants with the guardianship of his own honor?
47289	Will the honorable gentleman tell us why?
47289	Will they deign to listen to the voice of history, and learn how chimerical are their apprehensions?
47289	Will they not forever hereafter compel us to trade as they please?
47289	Will they prove us by the_ waters_, and reject all such as will not lap as the dog lappeth?
47289	Will this old argument, in favor of a navy, now be used, which we have so often heard heretofore?
47289	Will you call upon her to leave your ports and harbors untouched, only just till you can return from Canada to defend them?
47289	Will you find him in the person of an acquitted felon?
47289	Will you have a list of them?
47289	Will you have any?
47289	Will you keep house forever, rather than make choice of the path through which you will resume your external rights?
47289	Will you not only go to war, but wage a_ bellum ad internecinum_ for it?
47289	Will you open your campaign at mid- summer?
47289	Will you protect that clandestinely destined to Great Britain?
47289	Will you protect that destined to the coast of France?
47289	Will you refuse to do yours?"
47289	Will you say that your provocations were less then than now?
47289	Will you say to England,"end the war when you please, give us the direct trade in our own produce, we are content?"
47289	Will you seek for the deep foundations of her power in the frozen deserts of Labrador?
47289	Will you tax the great agricultural community for the purpose of protecting this extraneous commerce?
47289	Will you, sir, have the goodness to direct an inquiry, and order the release of such as are citizens of the United States?
47289	Will, then, any injury, or any combination of injuries, authorize or require national resentment?
47289	With them alone?
47289	With these facts staring him in the face, how could he do otherwise than urge an early session?
47289	With this discriminating, permanent, municipal law, could we expect Great Britain to treat with us as a neutral?
47289	With what sentiment, think you, would such doctrines have been received?
47289	Without her maritime strength, would she have aspired to balance the scales of power on the Continent?
47289	Would a tax on salt, he asked, be equal?
47289	Would any gentleman who regarded his honor tell the House that there were 30,000 inhabitants in the undisputed Territory?
47289	Would he not be right to suspect those who vote for, and more especially those who bring forward such a proposition, of improper motives?
47289	Would he not have used it as one of the strongest inducements to the adoption of this system?
47289	Would he respect us more than England would?
47289	Would it be good policy, he asked, to let our means of carrying on war on the ocean rot in our docks, and not make use of them?
47289	Would it be possible that foreign powers could look up with any reverence to their acts?
47289	Would it establish our neutral rights?
47289	Would it have been proper for the Government to have entered into no stipulations for the security of American seamen?
47289	Would it have had that power, if this right had not been expressly delegated?
47289	Would it not prove beyond doubt that the Administration was sincere in its wishes for peace?
47289	Would it, in your opinion, be advisable to increase the duty on foreign tonnage?
47289	Would not the passage of this resolution be considered as an indirect censure on the other Revolutionary characters who have gone from us?
47289	Would not these carriers supply their own manufacturers?
47289	Would she carry products of other nations, and let her own manufacturers starve?
47289	Would she have become a party to the infamous conspiracy of Pilnitz?
47289	Would she have broken the peace of Amiens whence her present dangers arise?
47289	Would she have wantonly plotted the dismemberment of France?
47289	Would the English nation have endured it?
47289	Would the chivalry of gentlemen on the other side of the House have suggested an invasion of France?
47289	Would the conquest of those colonies shake the policy of the British cabinet?
47289	Would the remedy for this interference with our rights be abandoning the ocean altogether?
47289	Would they have been permitted in favor of the United States, could those wants be supplied from any other quarter?
47289	Would they suffer cotton to go elsewhere, until they themselves were supplied?
47289	Would this satisfy the Emperor?
47289	Would you be apt to look as much at the nature of the propositions, as at the temper of the assailant?
47289	Would you consent to see a scuffle at the gallows between the civil authority and the military for the body of that wretch?
47289	Would you have excluded British vessels since 1793, for taking the vessels engaged in your lawful trade, and for impressing your seamen?
47289	Would you not tell such an assailant, that you were not to be bullied nor beaten into any concession?
47289	Would you ratify such an arrangement if you could help it?
47289	Would you ship your commerce there merely to surrender so much property into the grasp of the Emperor?
47289	Yes, Mr. President, I reiterate, are they not murderers?
47289	Yes, sir, ask yourself this question in regard to any man, to whom you are about to confide important trusts: Does he pay his just debts?
47289	Yet, I ask the question: is not the spirit which it breathes disgraceful?
47289	You have always got the better of the argument; you have better proclamations; but what avails all this?
47289	You have been heretofore told your paper measures were worth nothing: now that it is proposed to give blow for blow, what is said?
47289	You have taken Quebec-- have you conquered England?
47289	You will wage war, and not to rescue your fellow- citizens from imprisonment and stripes?
47289	Your trade was, a few years ago, unrestrained and flourishing-- did it not enrich the most distant parts of your country?
47289	[ 34] For these injuries and insults what atonement has been made?
47289	_ Blank ballots, shall they be counted?_--In the House on election for Speaker two blank ballots were cast, shall they be counted?
47289	_ In the House_, bill taken up, 547; is it such as to require secrecy?
47289	_ Now_, where are we?
47289	above the legal rate of interest?
47289	and has she not always refused to make any arrangement about them?
47289	and that, too, from a nation at all times disposed to depress this growing country?
47289	and what would be the probable addition to the revenue applicable to the year 1814 by such increase?
47289	are they now more disposed to succumb and accept your terms than before the war?
47289	debate become angry and be prolonged?
47289	did they fall?
47289	for relieving him from a dreadful captivity?
47289	has the gentleman received any such, even informally, from any officer of this Government?
47289	how is it so influenced?
47289	how?
47289	if so, whence did it arise?
47289	is this that_ bona fide_ performance of the condition?
47289	or does any American wish to see his country prostrated still lower?
47289	or from the unofficial conversation of the members of the House?
47289	or how can Mr. Jackson reconcile it to himself to say that in adhering to these gross insinuations, he did not intend to give offence?
47289	or is her hostility merely commercial?
47289	or should even endeavor to teach others to venerate, to cherish, to support it?
47289	shall our militia be commanded by officers commissioned by the President?
47289	the orders of June and November, 1793, which produced Jay''s treaty?
47289	to engage every man who is willing to serve his country?
47289	to place a recruiting officer in almost every town and village in the United States?
47289	were parties never before heard of in this country?
47289	what injury have we not suffered?
47289	what''s that?
47289	what''s that?"
47289	where would have been that proud spirit of resistance to Ministerial encroachment on our rights and liberties, which achieved our independence?
47289	whether, by our laws, and the practice under them, we have afforded them all that protection and security to which they are entitled?
47289	who are they?"