The weirdest people in the world?
- PMID: 20550733
- DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
The weirdest people in the world?
Abstract
Behavioral scientists routinely publish broad claims about human psychology and behavior in the world's top journals based on samples drawn entirely from Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. Researchers - often implicitly - assume that either there is little variation across human populations, or that these "standard subjects" are as representative of the species as any other population. Are these assumptions justified? Here, our review of the comparative database from across the behavioral sciences suggests both that there is substantial variability in experimental results across populations and that WEIRD subjects are particularly unusual compared with the rest of the species - frequent outliers. The domains reviewed include visual perception, fairness, cooperation, spatial reasoning, categorization and inferential induction, moral reasoning, reasoning styles, self-concepts and related motivations, and the heritability of IQ. The findings suggest that members of WEIRD societies, including young children, are among the least representative populations one could find for generalizing about humans. Many of these findings involve domains that are associated with fundamental aspects of psychology, motivation, and behavior - hence, there are no obvious a priori grounds for claiming that a particular behavioral phenomenon is universal based on sampling from a single subpopulation. Overall, these empirical patterns suggests that we need to be less cavalier in addressing questions of human nature on the basis of data drawn from this particularly thin, and rather unusual, slice of humanity. We close by proposing ways to structurally re-organize the behavioral sciences to best tackle these challenges.
Similar articles
-
Weird people, yes, but also weird experiments.Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):84-5. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000038. Epub 2010 Jun 15. Behav Brain Sci. 2010. PMID: 20550737
-
The weirdest brains in the world.Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):88-90. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000282. Epub 2010 Jun 15. Behav Brain Sci. 2010. PMID: 20546651
-
Culture and the quest for universal principles in moral reasoning.Int J Psychol. 2011 Jun 1;46(3):161-76. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.568486. Int J Psychol. 2011. PMID: 22044230 Review.
-
Responsible behavioral science generalizations and applications require much more than non-WEIRD samples.Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):98-9. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X10000142. Epub 2010 Jun 15. Behav Brain Sci. 2010. PMID: 20546663
-
A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences.Behav Brain Sci. 2007 Feb;30(1):1-16; discussion 16-61. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X07000581. Behav Brain Sci. 2007. PMID: 17475022 Review.
Cited by 681 articles
-
Neural signatures of syntactic variation in speech planning.PLoS Biol. 2021 Jan 26;19(1):e3001038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001038. eCollection 2021 Jan. PLoS Biol. 2021. PMID: 33497384 Free PMC article.
-
The social function of the feeling and expression of guilt.R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Dec 9;7(12):200617. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200617. eCollection 2020 Dec. R Soc Open Sci. 2020. PMID: 33489253 Free PMC article.
-
The perception of interpersonal distance is distorted by the Müller-Lyer illusion.Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):494. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80073-y. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33436801 Free PMC article.
-
Canadian undergraduate men's visual attention to cisgender women, cisgender men, and feminine trans individuals.Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 11;11(1):388. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79870-2. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33432074 Free PMC article.
-
To which world regions does the valence-dominance model of social perception apply?Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Jan;5(1):159-169. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01007-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4. Nat Hum Behav. 2021. PMID: 33398150
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources