This is a table of type bigram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.
bigram | frequency |
---|---|
psychological distress | 896 |
mental health | 582 |
psychological safety | 278 |
healthcare workers | 244 |
psychological impact | 193 |
general population | 149 |
mobile phone | 148 |
social support | 146 |
psychological health | 140 |
health care | 131 |
psychological problems | 127 |
team members | 120 |
public health | 119 |
phone addiction | 114 |
coronavirus disease | 104 |
respiratory syndrome | 99 |
psychological resilience | 96 |
stress disorder | 93 |
healthcare professionals | 92 |
acute respiratory | 91 |
life satisfaction | 90 |
psychological flexibility | 90 |
psychological intervention | 89 |
severe acute | 87 |
novel coronavirus | 86 |
present study | 85 |
medical staff | 84 |
psychological service | 84 |
previous studies | 83 |
general health | 80 |
perceived control | 80 |
inclusive leadership | 78 |
traumatic stress | 73 |
psychological services | 71 |
distress among | 69 |
healthcare teams | 68 |
psychological distance | 66 |
psychological inflexibility | 64 |
care workers | 63 |
physical symptoms | 63 |
psychological wellbeing | 62 |
coping style | 62 |
higher levels | 62 |
current study | 62 |
coping strategies | 60 |
data collection | 60 |
perceived stress | 59 |
health problems | 58 |
psychological effects | 58 |
panic spread | 57 |
high psychological | 57 |
health questionnaire | 55 |
psychological penalty | 55 |
risk factors | 55 |
systematic review | 54 |
healthcare providers | 54 |
entrepreneurial intentions | 53 |
pandemic severity | 51 |
temporary resettlement | 50 |
psychological capital | 49 |
regional pandemic | 48 |
psychological interventions | 48 |
statistically significant | 48 |
doc id | 48 |
logistic regression | 48 |
cord uid | 48 |
high levels | 48 |
negative emotions | 47 |
health workers | 47 |
physical health | 46 |
acute stress | 46 |
sars outbreak | 45 |
perceived general | 45 |
posttraumatic stress | 45 |
institutional support | 45 |
coping styles | 45 |
sectional study | 44 |
infectious disease | 44 |
family members | 44 |
psychological well | 42 |
depressive symptoms | 41 |
psychological outcomes | 41 |
mediating role | 40 |
online survey | 40 |
social distancing | 39 |
family doctors | 39 |
sample size | 38 |
team leader | 38 |
among healthcare | 38 |
health professionals | 38 |
world health | 37 |
penalty cost | 37 |
intervention cost | 36 |
mobile phones | 36 |
anxiety disorder | 36 |
significantly associated | 36 |
observation measure | 36 |
infectious diseases | 35 |
postgraduate trainees | 35 |
higher scores | 35 |
entrepreneurial intention | 35 |
informed consent | 35 |
hong kong | 35 |
psychological support | 35 |
psychiatric patients | 34 |
psychometric properties | 34 |
hiv healthcare | 34 |
health outcomes | 33 |
young people | 33 |
among chinese | 33 |
positive emotions | 32 |
sleep quality | 32 |
mental disorders | 32 |
confirmed cases | 32 |
research priorities | 32 |
health organization | 32 |
factors associated | 32 |
coronavirus stress | 32 |
medical workers | 31 |
psychological responses | 31 |
health services | 31 |
psychological stress | 31 |
structural equation | 31 |
point likert | 31 |
service provider | 30 |
university students | 30 |
mental illness | 30 |
line work | 30 |
study found | 29 |
resettlement sites | 29 |
college students | 29 |
composite measure | 29 |
general public | 29 |
patient health | 29 |
social media | 29 |
demographic characteristics | 28 |
psychological status | 28 |
perceived social | 28 |
regression analysis | 28 |
job involvement | 28 |
total score | 28 |
future research | 28 |
immediate psychological | 28 |
infective people | 27 |
social isolation | 27 |
likert scale | 27 |
significant differences | 27 |
need satisfaction | 26 |
see table | 26 |
may also | 26 |
united states | 26 |
alcohol use | 26 |
generalized anxiety | 26 |
health status | 26 |
job demands | 26 |
negative coping | 26 |
life events | 25 |
sars epidemic | 25 |
academic stress | 25 |
preventive measures | 25 |
safety within | 25 |
psychological science | 24 |
psychological need | 24 |
associated factors | 24 |
psychologically safe | 24 |
health crisis | 24 |
improve psychological | 24 |
positively associated | 24 |
lower levels | 24 |
mediation model | 23 |
disease outbreak | 23 |
higher level | 23 |
patient safety | 23 |
among health | 23 |
rapid review | 23 |
daily life | 23 |
risk perception | 23 |
coronavirus outbreak | 23 |
temporary shelters | 23 |
high level | 23 |
insomnia symptoms | 22 |
authors declare | 22 |
initial stage | 22 |
longitudinal study | 22 |
early stages | 22 |
demographic variables | 22 |
per day | 22 |
sectional survey | 21 |
indirect effect | 21 |
internal consistency | 21 |
higher risk | 21 |
sleep problems | 21 |
also found | 21 |
coping responses | 21 |
behaviour change | 21 |
ptsd symptoms | 21 |
shadow evacuation | 21 |
protective equipment | 21 |
staff members | 20 |
stress among | 20 |
marital status | 20 |
coping self | 20 |
results showed | 20 |
factor analysis | 20 |
commitment therapy | 20 |
disease control | 20 |
severe psychological | 20 |
team member | 20 |
common method | 20 |
wait times | 20 |
psychological scientists | 20 |
psychological symptoms | 19 |
less likely | 19 |
overall psychological | 19 |
gender differences | 19 |
every day | 19 |
health issues | 19 |
perceived threat | 19 |
low levels | 19 |
among frontline | 19 |
may lead | 19 |
protective factor | 19 |
high perceived | 19 |
online questionnaire | 19 |
traumatic event | 19 |
past month | 19 |
psychiatric disorders | 19 |
study aims | 18 |
emotional stability | 18 |
ethics committee | 18 |
negative impact | 18 |
disease outbreaks | 18 |
team meetings | 18 |
hubei province | 18 |
three groups | 18 |
health emergency | 18 |
epidemic among | 18 |
high risk | 18 |
previous study | 18 |
outcomes among | 18 |
wellbeing study | 18 |
suspected infection | 18 |
psychological needs | 18 |
emerging infectious | 18 |
passive coping | 18 |
anxiety symptoms | 18 |
coronavirus pneumonia | 18 |
service providers | 18 |
primary care | 18 |
pandemic perception | 18 |
descriptive statistics | 17 |
significantly predicted | 17 |
moderating effect | 17 |
results show | 17 |
active coping | 17 |
frontline healthcare | 17 |
panic degree | 17 |
personal protective | 17 |
stress symptoms | 17 |
work environment | 17 |
psychological morbidity | 17 |
one another | 17 |
measured using | 17 |
loved ones | 17 |
within healthcare | 17 |
protective factors | 16 |
leadership style | 16 |
general hospital | 16 |
scale ranging | 16 |
depth understanding | 16 |
psychiatric morbidity | 16 |
large number | 16 |
data analysis | 16 |
natural disasters | 16 |
medical care | 16 |
alone may | 16 |
proactive personality | 16 |
results indicated | 16 |
disaster victims | 16 |
sociodemographic variables | 16 |
moderated mediation | 16 |
increased risk | 16 |
healthy controls | 16 |
previous research | 16 |
assessed using | 16 |
chinese population | 16 |
negative psychological | 16 |
current covid | 16 |
becoming infected | 16 |
ebola virus | 16 |
study design | 16 |
education level | 16 |
stressful events | 16 |
personality traits | 16 |
job satisfaction | 16 |
regression models | 16 |
factors influencing | 15 |
health emergencies | 15 |
psychological adjustment | 15 |
indirect effects | 15 |
contact tracing | 15 |
future studies | 15 |
several studies | 15 |
dependent variable | 15 |
psychological factors | 15 |
among people | 15 |
current pandemic | 15 |
medical residents | 15 |
point scale | 15 |
study also | 15 |
building cost | 15 |
syndrome coronavirus | 15 |
survey results | 15 |
control measures | 15 |
psychological consequences | 15 |
family doctor | 15 |
national health | 15 |
protective behaviors | 15 |
confidence interval | 15 |
study participants | 15 |
positively related | 15 |
recent study | 14 |
moderating role | 14 |
method bias | 14 |
low psychological | 14 |
outcome variables | 14 |
transportation cost | 14 |
family income | 14 |
study sample | 14 |
years old | 14 |
distress scale | 14 |
linear regression | 14 |
social networking | 14 |
coronavirus covid | 14 |
among hiv | 14 |
susceptible people | 14 |
severity index | 14 |
missing data | 14 |
substance use | 14 |
stress responses | 14 |
disaster sites | 14 |
psychological impacts | 14 |
direct contact | 14 |
line workers | 14 |
lower psychological | 13 |
using spss | 13 |
traumatic events | 13 |
general anxiety | 13 |
virus disease | 13 |
work resumption | 13 |
mental well | 13 |
statistical analysis | 13 |
related factors | 13 |
hospital workers | 13 |
subjective deterioration | 13 |
positively correlated | 13 |
higher psychological | 13 |
severe anxiety | 13 |
performance sustenance | 13 |
independent variables | 13 |
avoidant coping | 13 |
qualitative study | 13 |
support services | 13 |
insomnia severity | 13 |
negative effects | 13 |
results suggest | 13 |
suicidal ideation | 13 |
east respiratory | 13 |
equine influenza | 13 |
generalised anxiety | 13 |
study conducted | 13 |
services process | 13 |
psychological burden | 13 |
positive coping | 13 |
protective measures | 13 |
effect size | 13 |
questions related | 13 |
social networks | 13 |
global pandemic | 13 |
disorder scale | 13 |
middle east | 13 |
coronavirus pandemic | 13 |
equation modeling | 13 |
symptoms among | 13 |
sars survivors | 13 |
among medical | 13 |
moderating effects | 13 |
survey measures | 13 |
style questionnaire | 13 |
machine learning | 12 |
infected patients | 12 |
negative affect | 12 |
related stress | 12 |
take part | 12 |
regression analyses | 12 |
stress levels | 12 |
health system | 12 |
also showed | 12 |
confirmatory factor | 12 |
strongly agree | 12 |
nursing staff | 12 |
spanish population | 12 |
risk factor | 12 |
response style | 12 |
determination theory | 12 |
problems among | 12 |
rights reserved | 12 |
item self | 12 |
healthcare services | 12 |
literature review | 12 |
standard deviation | 12 |
health among | 12 |
sociodemographic characteristics | 12 |
strongly disagree | 12 |
stressful life | 12 |
performed using | 12 |
mental state | 12 |
first responders | 12 |
sars patients | 12 |
participants reported | 12 |
health conditions | 12 |
nationwide survey | 12 |
individual differences | 12 |
kessler psychological | 12 |
also asked | 12 |
type scale | 12 |
categorical variables | 12 |
chinese version | 12 |
related industry | 12 |
four costs | 12 |
services work | 12 |
negatively associated | 12 |
respondents reported | 12 |
baseline survey | 12 |
mean age | 12 |
results indicate | 12 |
psychological empowerment | 11 |
study population | 11 |
care professionals | 11 |
infected staff | 11 |
psychological research | 11 |
event scale | 11 |
approach coping | 11 |
stress reactions | 11 |
significant psychological | 11 |
direct effect | 11 |
visiting wuhan | 11 |
control variables | 11 |
syndrome outbreak | 11 |
phone addicts | 11 |
epidemic prevention | 11 |
one team | 11 |
receiving negative | 11 |
horse industry | 11 |
showed higher | 11 |
another study | 11 |
vulnerable groups | 11 |
positive psychological | 11 |
wenchuan earthquake | 11 |
psychological pressure | 11 |
among survivors | 11 |
pandemic may | 11 |
mental wellbeing | 11 |
crowded places | 11 |
contracting covid | 11 |
global health | 11 |
low perceived | 11 |
data collected | 11 |
prevention measures | 11 |
good reliability | 11 |
amongst healthcare | 11 |
brief cope | 11 |
measurement model | 11 |
work engagement | 11 |
study aimed | 11 |
particularly important | 11 |
predict psychological | 11 |
basic psychological | 11 |
psychological experience | 11 |
washing hands | 11 |
inclusion criteria | 11 |
people will | 11 |
april th | 11 |
positive psychology | 11 |
young adults | 11 |
among women | 10 |
internal reliability | 10 |
response options | 10 |
measuring psychological | 10 |
specific psychological | 10 |
empirical evidence | 10 |
hospital employees | 10 |
predictive ability | 10 |
influenza pandemic | 10 |
health burden | 10 |
evd outbreak | 10 |
response rate | 10 |
important role | 10 |
people living | 10 |
latent variables | 10 |
multiple regression | 10 |
one study | 10 |
significantly higher | 10 |
snowball sampling | 10 |
cross sectional | 10 |
coping strategy | 10 |
infection control | 10 |
term psychological | 10 |
term consequences | 10 |
free choice | 10 |
time step | 10 |
physical activity | 10 |
psychosocial impact | 10 |
disaster evacuation | 10 |
written informed | 10 |
coping behaviours | 10 |
without suspected | 10 |
ethical approval | 10 |
collect data | 10 |
regression model | 10 |
members felt | 10 |
adverse effects | 10 |
scale developed | 10 |
resilience scale | 10 |
study variables | 10 |
severe depression | 10 |
experiential avoidance | 10 |
reported higher | 10 |
institutional review | 10 |
younger people | 10 |
stress scale | 10 |
multivariate logistic | 10 |
survey measure | 10 |
heavy drinking | 10 |
stress management | 10 |
case study | 10 |
april april | 10 |
among adolescents | 10 |
psychiatric symptoms | 10 |
psychological state | 10 |
close contact | 10 |
review board | 10 |
head nurses | 10 |
affective constructs | 10 |
depression among | 10 |
simplified coping | 10 |
higher score | 10 |
online psychological | 10 |
may help | 10 |
average age | 10 |
i think | 10 |
group chat | 10 |
horse owners | 10 |
media reports | 9 |
health doi | 9 |
reduce psychological | 9 |
longitudinal studies | 9 |
infected people | 9 |
three items | 9 |
wuhan city | 9 |
depressive disorder | 9 |
hand washing | 9 |
predicted psychological | 9 |
diagnostic criteria | 9 |
drinking behavior | 9 |
may experience | 9 |
lower capacity | 9 |
health effects | 9 |
team meeting | 9 |
family member | 9 |
uk population | 9 |
factor structure | 9 |
greater psychological | 9 |
acute phase | 9 |
sectional design | 9 |
significant difference | 9 |
epidemic covid | 9 |
peer support | 9 |
took part | 9 |
depression symptoms | 9 |
factor model | 9 |
demographic data | 9 |
one person | 9 |
voice behaviours | 9 |
lockdown restrictions | 9 |
working hours | 9 |
psychological assistance | 9 |
among sars | 9 |
internal locus | 9 |
low level | 9 |
cause psychological | 9 |
item scale | 9 |
health worker | 9 |
negative feedback | 9 |
workers exposed | 9 |
affects psychological | 9 |
impact among | 9 |
healthcare system | 9 |
law enforcement | 9 |
empowerment scale | 9 |
positive relationship | 9 |
confirmed covid | 9 |
longitudinal research | 9 |
psychological crisis | 9 |
confidence intervals | 9 |
continuous variables | 9 |
resumption period | 9 |
physical distancing | 9 |
educational level | 9 |
urgently needed | 9 |
team leaders | 9 |
affected regions | 9 |
million people | 9 |
wide range | 9 |
leadership styles | 9 |
short version | 9 |
nervous system | 9 |
total number | 9 |
subjective well | 9 |
psychological traits | 9 |
precautionary measures | 9 |
method variance | 9 |
school closures | 9 |
partial least | 9 |
partial containment | 9 |
term mental | 9 |
last days | 9 |
health beliefs | 9 |
survey items | 9 |
attachment style | 9 |
information received | 9 |
civil society | 9 |
chinese hiv | 9 |
mass media | 9 |
ptsd checklist | 9 |
pilot test | 9 |
spread among | 9 |
psychological reactions | 9 |
early stage | 9 |
i feel | 9 |
study provides | 9 |
creative commons | 8 |
emotion regulation | 8 |
joined front | 8 |
big five | 8 |
social science | 8 |
related psychological | 8 |
mediating effects | 8 |
negative information | 8 |
likert type | 8 |
care providers | 8 |
supplementary materials | 8 |
distress levels | 8 |
perceived organizational | 8 |
may th | 8 |
affective temperament | 8 |
experienced psychological | 8 |
vicarious traumatization | 8 |
past days | 8 |
different healthcare | 8 |
avoiding crowded | 8 |
relationships among | 8 |
promoting psychological | 8 |
negative effect | 8 |
seven factors | 8 |
disaster site | 8 |
different levels | 8 |
mean scores | 8 |
somatic symptoms | 8 |
latin america | 8 |
monetary costs | 8 |
ebola outbreak | 8 |
stress response | 8 |
previous literature | 8 |
lessons learned | 8 |
perceived risk | 8 |
one hand | 8 |
emotional state | 8 |
early phase | 8 |
emotional distress | 8 |
junior team | 8 |
female students | 8 |
distress related | 8 |
recent studies | 8 |
study will | 8 |
negative emotional | 8 |
national survey | 8 |
defensive voice | 8 |
statistical manual | 8 |
frontline health | 8 |
rated physical | 8 |
symptoms amongst | 8 |
standard error | 8 |
affective state | 8 |
larson lee | 8 |
pressure ward | 8 |
income countries | 8 |
people affected | 8 |
measures taken | 8 |
respondents whose | 8 |
chinese people | 8 |
related distress | 8 |
will allow | 8 |
model fit | 8 |
sampling method | 8 |
psychosocial support | 8 |
interpersonal relationships | 8 |
control moderates | 8 |
medical students | 8 |
independently associated | 8 |
odds ratio | 8 |
adapted survey | 8 |
healthcare systems | 8 |
final sample | 8 |
crisis intervention | 8 |
challenges faced | 8 |
negative pressure | 8 |
hiv care | 8 |
two groups | 8 |
interview data | 8 |
initial number | 8 |
qualitative research | 8 |
medical teams | 8 |
may play | 8 |
survey responses | 8 |
monetary cost | 8 |
stressful situations | 8 |
observational study | 8 |
significant association | 8 |
contains items | 8 |
inclusive leaders | 8 |
two weeks | 8 |
psychological trauma | 8 |
adverse psychological | 8 |
join front | 8 |
existing mental | 8 |
statistical analyses | 8 |
equation model | 8 |
health service | 8 |
response categories | 8 |
frontline hcws | 8 |
wenchuan county | 8 |
timely mental | 8 |
provide psychological | 8 |
survey data | 8 |
among nurses | 8 |
competing interests | 8 |
feedback sessions | 8 |
sectional observational | 8 |
bivariate analyses | 8 |
thematic analysis | 8 |
root mean | 8 |
face psychological | 8 |
getting infected | 8 |
mild psychological | 8 |
participants provided | 8 |
high prevalence | 8 |
pandemic situation | 8 |
critical incident | 8 |
many people | 8 |
psychological counseling | 8 |
social cohesion | 8 |
partial confinement | 8 |
homeless victims | 8 |
influencing factors | 8 |
marker variable | 8 |
familiarity behaviours | 8 |
healthcare staff | 8 |
health survey | 8 |
positive leadership | 8 |
sore throat | 8 |
psychological changes | 8 |
item general | 8 |
major depressive | 8 |
online mental | 8 |
recruited via | 8 |
primary health | 8 |
stress reaction | 8 |
health concerns | 8 |
uncontrolled use | 8 |
study period | 8 |
will help | 8 |
current situation | 8 |
building shelters | 8 |
based survey | 8 |
health authorities | 8 |
reported symptoms | 8 |
greater risk | 8 |
mers outbreak | 8 |
table presents | 8 |
analytic review | 7 |
nearly every | 7 |
four healthcare | 7 |
among family | 7 |
standard deviations | 7 |
primary healthcare | 7 |
preceding week | 7 |
scores indicating | 7 |
i will | 7 |
four measured | 7 |
disorder among | 7 |
convergent validity | 7 |
recent literature | 7 |
reported moderate | 7 |
resources theory | 7 |
health commission | 7 |
perceived health | 7 |
population health | 7 |
contact history | 7 |
least squares | 7 |
perceived psychological | 7 |
per cent | 7 |
poor sleep | 7 |
higher education | 7 |
results also | 7 |
adolescents suffering | 7 |
coping flexibility | 7 |
time steps | 7 |
psychological consultation | 7 |
jurisdictional claims | 7 |
drinking frequency | 7 |
depressive disorders | 7 |
participants showed | 7 |
policy recommendations | 7 |
research team | 7 |
ethical review | 7 |
silence behaviours | 7 |
risk groups | 7 |
sichuan earthquake | 7 |
note springer | 7 |
measured indicators | 7 |
teams aiding | 7 |
among college | 7 |
patient care | 7 |
mean square | 7 |
commonly reported | 7 |
greater levels | 7 |
online surveys | 7 |
smartphone addiction | 7 |
social sciences | 7 |
irish teams | 7 |
negatively related | 7 |
time spent | 7 |
among victims | 7 |
construct validity | 7 |
widely used | 7 |
institutional affiliations | 7 |
healthcare context | 7 |
jordanian nurses | 7 |
also important | 7 |
interpersonal isolation | 7 |
large sample | 7 |
within four | 7 |
multicentre study | 7 |
social contact | 7 |
italian general | 7 |
published maps | 7 |
path analysis | 7 |
determine whether | 7 |
increased prevalence | 7 |
findings suggest | 7 |
work stress | 7 |
remains neutral | 7 |
example item | 7 |
virus outbreak | 7 |
correlation coefficients | 7 |
serious mental | 7 |
behavioral responses | 7 |
organizational support | 7 |
related perceived | 7 |
associated physical | 7 |
altruistic acceptance | 7 |
employee health | 7 |
significance level | 7 |
use within | 7 |
available online | 7 |
influencing psychological | 7 |
binary logistic | 7 |
emotional responses | 7 |
career choice | 7 |
perceived impacts | 7 |
anxiety disorders | 7 |
protective effect | 7 |
variance extracted | 7 |
brief measure | 7 |
environmental stressors | 7 |
poor mental | 7 |
mediating effect | 7 |
increased psychological | 7 |
family functioning | 7 |
hospital staff | 7 |
moderate severe | 7 |
underlying mechanisms | 7 |
aged years | 7 |
measurement error | 7 |
march th | 7 |
developing psychological | 7 |
one month | 7 |
presented psychological | 7 |
corona virus | 7 |
living situations | 7 |
psychological disorders | 7 |
will likely | 7 |
interpersonal problems | 7 |
nature remains | 7 |
incident stress | 7 |
springer nature | 7 |
sierra leone | 7 |
health consequences | 7 |
psychological response | 7 |
high degree | 7 |
subscale score | 7 |
clinical characteristics | 7 |
also used | 7 |
item patient | 7 |
adapted composite | 7 |
psychological vulnerability | 7 |
crosssectional study | 7 |
table shows | 7 |
factor named | 7 |
sleep disorders | 7 |
temporary housing | 7 |
chinese adolescents | 7 |
higher prevalence | 7 |
interpersonal risks | 7 |
suspected cases | 7 |
coronavirus epidemic | 7 |
human resources | 7 |
response bias | 7 |
intensive care | 7 |
among young | 7 |
psychosocial problems | 6 |
remote working | 6 |
people may | 6 |
control may | 6 |
nurses caring | 6 |
disease containment | 6 |
multidisciplinary research | 6 |
possible risk | 6 |
psychological adaptation | 6 |
regular exercise | 6 |
isolation ward | 6 |
take care | 6 |
psychiatric history | 6 |
local government | 6 |
resettlement site | 6 |
standing committee | 6 |
resettlement solutions | 6 |
hospital healthcare | 6 |
exclusion criteria | 6 |
avoidance strategies | 6 |
perceived harm | 6 |
squared test | 6 |
chinese study | 6 |
critical role | 6 |
factors affecting | 6 |
workers psychological | 6 |
social comparison | 6 |
research indicates | 6 |
significant negative | 6 |
prior research | 6 |
frontline nurses | 6 |
team psychological | 6 |
traumatic experience | 6 |
different groups | 6 |
colleague client | 6 |
health science | 6 |
lasted min | 6 |
resettlement capacity | 6 |
prevention strategies | 6 |
screening scale | 6 |
disaster areas | 6 |
five items | 6 |
may increase | 6 |
older adults | 6 |
cost increases | 6 |
psychological first | 6 |
healthcare professional | 6 |
evacuation decisions | 6 |
stable psychological | 6 |
three questions | 6 |
learning behaviours | 6 |
resource allocation | 6 |
pandemic will | 6 |
related health | 6 |
scientific research | 6 |
experience psychological | 6 |
sociogenic illness | 6 |
health challenges | 6 |
mass sociogenic | 6 |
collected using | 6 |
lancet psychiatry | 6 |
many countries | 6 |
respondents without | 6 |
mouth disease | 6 |
occupational effects | 6 |
clinically significant | 6 |
work teams | 6 |
transformational leadership | 6 |
new coronavirus | 6 |
research priority | 6 |
may contribute | 6 |
personal issues | 6 |
exploratory factor | 6 |
spss version | 6 |
management team | 6 |
charismatic leadership | 6 |
excessive use | 6 |
serious psychological | 6 |
containment measures | 6 |
within teams | 6 |
entrepreneurial behavior | 6 |
depression anxiety | 6 |
structural model | 6 |
average variance | 6 |
commonly used | 6 |
model showed | 6 |
health belief | 6 |
examine whether | 6 |
intervention strategies | 6 |
tertiary education | 6 |
sociodemographic data | 6 |
several limitations | 6 |
study indicated | 6 |
behavior among | 6 |
elevated levels | 6 |
isi score | 6 |
ecological perspective | 6 |
items measure | 6 |
uk nations | 6 |
alcohol consumption | 6 |
psychological care | 6 |
first outbreak | 6 |
life outcomes | 6 |
organizational resilience | 6 |
death toll | 6 |
empirical research | 6 |
middle school | 6 |
chinese university | 6 |
epidemic situation | 6 |
research findings | 6 |
day searching | 6 |
correlation analysis | 6 |
negative experience | 6 |
social care | 6 |
response scale | 6 |
posttraumatic growth | 6 |
health concern | 6 |
emotional control | 6 |
individuals may | 6 |
agency standing | 6 |
personal experiences | 6 |
holistic understanding | 6 |
latent variable | 6 |
recent research | 6 |
report higher | 6 |
italian normative | 6 |
social impacts | 6 |
services confidence | 6 |
urgent need | 6 |
organizational productivity | 6 |
highest prevalence | 6 |
conducted using | 6 |
screened positive | 6 |
creative psychological | 6 |
previous pandemics | 6 |
affect psychological | 6 |
fit indices | 6 |
adj cm | 6 |
mindfulness meditation | 6 |
systematic reviews | 6 |
positive outcomes | 6 |
common mental | 6 |
key role | 6 |
ncov epidemic | 6 |
quantitative studies | 6 |
existing literature | 6 |
showed high | 6 |
key workers | 6 |
community health | 6 |
government officials | 6 |
household income | 6 |
pfefferbaum north | 6 |
hours spent | 6 |
felt psychologically | 6 |
dependent variables | 6 |
related stressors | 6 |
short time | 6 |
workers involved | 6 |
odds ratios | 6 |
economic growth | 6 |
working arrangements | 6 |
rating scale | 6 |
may provide | 6 |
first aid | 6 |
neuropsychiatric symptoms | 6 |
entrepreneurship education | 6 |
first days | 6 |
composite reliability | 6 |
longer term | 6 |
reported psychological | 6 |
respondents completed | 6 |
survey platform | 6 |
social psychological | 6 |
prior studies | 6 |
rapid spread | 6 |
psychological sequelae | 6 |
support needs | 6 |
phone use | 6 |
test set | 6 |
also assessed | 6 |
healthy lifestyle | 6 |
hiv clinics | 6 |
early psychological | 6 |
tracing team | 6 |
statistical power | 6 |
client relationships | 6 |
frontline workers | 6 |
sample consisted | 6 |
cm regression | 6 |
pandemic covid | 6 |
chinese government | 6 |
learning behaviour | 6 |
class imbalance | 6 |
extremely severe | 6 |
facebook advertisement | 6 |
hand hygiene | 6 |
study results | 6 |
medication hypothesis | 6 |
depression severity | 6 |
emotional changes | 6 |
structured interviews | 6 |
traumatic experiences | 6 |
felt comfortable | 6 |
health systems | 6 |
mainland china | 6 |
mean score | 6 |
based cross | 6 |
past two | 6 |
team level | 6 |
adaptive coping | 6 |
networking sites | 6 |
information provided | 6 |
social network | 6 |
objective support | 6 |
providing hospital | 6 |
hierarchical linear | 6 |
psychological therapy | 6 |
neuropsychiatric sequelae | 6 |
chinese college | 6 |
distress due | 6 |
low self | 6 |
across various | 6 |
bioterrorism attack | 6 |
elderly people | 5 |
present sample | 5 |
social cognitive | 5 |
alpha value | 5 |
epub ahead | 5 |
correctly classifying | 5 |
respiratory symptoms | 5 |
table displays | 5 |
study used | 5 |
resilience training | 5 |
discriminant validity | 5 |
vast majority | 5 |
multiple linear | 5 |
intrinsic motivation | 5 |
immune system | 5 |
employment situation | 5 |
issues related | 5 |
will need | 5 |
managing mental | 5 |
opening remarks | 5 |
psychological strain | 5 |
good fit | 5 |
leader inclusiveness | 5 |
previously validated | 5 |
root causes | 5 |
many patients | 5 |
health anxiety | 5 |
positive participants | 5 |
results may | 5 |
assess whether | 5 |
hierarchical regression | 5 |
nurses working | 5 |
severely affected | 5 |
independent predictor | 5 |
nine items | 5 |
collecting data | 5 |
first attempt | 5 |
target population | 5 |
high score | 5 |
medical college | 5 |
small magnitude | 5 |
garda members | 5 |
main effects | 5 |
item generalised | 5 |
assess psychological | 5 |
viral outbreaks | 5 |
reactions among | 5 |
expect psychological | 5 |
research exploring | 5 |
uk general | 5 |
support scale | 5 |
medical personnel | 5 |
adverse situations | 5 |
greater use | 5 |
loadings ranging | 5 |
terror attack | 5 |
related dreams | 5 |
make decisions | 5 |
resilience levels | 5 |
taking care | 5 |
disaster relief | 5 |
rmb yuan | 5 |
large numbers | 5 |
wore masks | 5 |
amongst nurses | 5 |
mental ill | 5 |
showed significant | 5 |
long term | 5 |
interaction effect | 5 |
kashdan rottenberg | 5 |
public mental | 5 |
care personnel | 5 |
results suggested | 5 |
individual psychological | 5 |
address mental | 5 |
social impact | 5 |
may develop | 5 |
pilot tests | 5 |
influential factors | 5 |
among psychological | 5 |
detrimental effects | 5 |
short screening | 5 |
subjective support | 5 |
communication skills | 5 |
among adults | 5 |
emotional stress | 5 |
higher proportion | 5 |
psychological help | 5 |
potential risk | 5 |
many studies | 5 |
adult survivors | 5 |
sufficient knowledge | 5 |
italian people | 5 |
good internal | 5 |
affiliated hospital | 5 |
main factors | 5 |
high school | 5 |
job training | 5 |
may affect | 5 |
science research | 5 |
among individuals | 5 |
outcome measure | 5 |
may cause | 5 |
older people | 5 |
school students | 5 |
comparative study | 5 |
completion time | 5 |
junior doctors | 5 |
severe stress | 5 |
nurse managers | 5 |
spread rapidly | 5 |
karekla panayiotou | 5 |
observational measure | 5 |
studies also | 5 |
older age | 5 |
global jihad | 5 |
questionnaire items | 5 |
care services | 5 |
severe insomnia | 5 |
among adult | 5 |
may need | 5 |
medical health | 5 |
first case | 5 |
factor loadings | 5 |
important factor | 5 |
will experience | 5 |
doctor system | 5 |
treating patients | 5 |
support among | 5 |
loneliness scale | 5 |
greater proportion | 5 |
research questions | 5 |
report measures | 5 |
mental distress | 5 |
cultural differences | 5 |
national outbreak | 5 |
may reflect | 5 |
influence factors | 5 |
care unit | 5 |
factors may | 5 |
turkish version | 5 |
epidemic outbreak | 5 |
report bias | 5 |
provide information | 5 |
questionnaire star | 5 |
entrepreneurial process | 5 |
particularly vulnerable | 5 |
direct exposure | 5 |
distancing measures | 5 |
leadership roles | 5 |
help people | 5 |
terrorist attacks | 5 |
public confidence | 5 |
univariate analysis | 5 |
daily lives | 5 |
spread strength | 5 |
emotional regulation | 5 |
higher degree | 5 |
priority domains | 5 |
first month | 5 |
cell phone | 5 |
supportive behaviours | 5 |
assessing generalized | 5 |
health support | 5 |
services effectiveness | 5 |
asd among | 5 |
organizational behavior | 5 |
indicating higher | 5 |
measurement models | 5 |
identify factors | 5 |
mainly focused | 5 |
increased stress | 5 |
national institute | 5 |
active weibo | 5 |
based approach | 5 |
front line | 5 |
gender bias | 5 |
resettlement processes | 5 |
psychol doi | 5 |
drinks consumed | 5 |
two items | 5 |
corresponding author | 5 |
health interventions | 5 |
negative affective | 5 |
considered statistically | 5 |
study revealed | 5 |
among italian | 5 |
anxiety among | 5 |
first covid | 5 |
saudi arabia | 5 |
negatively correlated | 5 |
use disorders | 5 |
severe levels | 5 |
ei control | 5 |
new ways | 5 |
among others | 5 |
medical university | 5 |
critical review | 5 |
march rd | 5 |
environ res | 5 |
zhongnan hospital | 5 |
distress caused | 5 |
unadj cm | 5 |
regional general | 5 |
healthcare setting | 5 |
environmental factors | 5 |
may ruminate | 5 |
health impacts | 5 |
wellbeing outcomes | 5 |
provided informed | 5 |
negative impacts | 5 |
everyday life | 5 |
italian population | 5 |
settlement sites | 5 |
clinical psychology | 5 |
four levels | 5 |
female participants | 5 |
epidemic tasks | 5 |
three subscales | 5 |
personal lives | 5 |
west china | 5 |
related quality | 5 |
psychological resources | 5 |
cognitive theory | 5 |
greatest risk | 5 |
excellent psychometric | 5 |
epidemic may | 5 |
prime minister | 5 |
reasonable request | 5 |
facebook users | 5 |
three weeks | 5 |
patient outcomes | 5 |
ill health | 5 |
hurricane katrina | 5 |
study questionnaire | 5 |
avian influenza | 5 |
disease epidemic | 5 |
healthcare institutions | 5 |
mental attitude | 5 |
personal safety | 5 |
cohort study | 5 |
worried well | 5 |
emergency settlement | 5 |
specific coping | 5 |
demographic information | 5 |
specific grant | 5 |
develop psychological | 5 |
terror attacks | 5 |
size regional | 5 |
high rate | 5 |
neutral information | 5 |
square root | 5 |
research questionnaire | 5 |
health information | 5 |
higher rates | 5 |
terrorist attack | 5 |
monthly income | 5 |
various psychological | 5 |
correlations among | 5 |
dutch teams | 5 |
larger sample | 5 |
police officers | 5 |
financial support | 5 |
severe symptoms | 5 |
rural areas | 5 |
epidemic declaration | 5 |
wu chen | 5 |
better understand | 5 |
convenience sample | 5 |
experimental results | 5 |
spss statistics | 5 |
lower level | 5 |
existing psychiatric | 5 |
related information | 5 |
drinking episodes | 5 |
study hospital | 5 |
eight items | 5 |
lowest prevalence | 5 |
life disturbance | 5 |
psychological factor | 5 |
scale items | 5 |
secondary traumatic | 5 |
weibo users | 5 |
results obtained | 5 |
mental problems | 5 |
addicts may | 5 |
research suggests | 5 |
residence location | 5 |
science foundation | 5 |
commons attribution | 5 |
intervention programs | 5 |
position paper | 5 |
new york | 5 |
direct effects | 5 |
davidson resilience | 5 |
research methods | 5 |
significantly correlated | 5 |
score ranges | 5 |
within one | 5 |
res public | 5 |
substance abuse | 5 |
multivariate analysis | 5 |
among university | 5 |
demographic factors | 5 |
open access | 5 |
voice behaviour | 5 |
mutual aid | 5 |
global model | 5 |
unsupportive behaviours | 5 |
study showed | 5 |
united kingdom | 5 |
current crisis | 5 |
will also | 5 |
british psychological | 5 |
measure psychological | 5 |
emotional impact | 5 |
inverse relationship | 5 |
government restrictions | 5 |
home confinement | 5 |
pandemic continues | 5 |
mental disorder | 5 |
outbreak stress | 5 |
medium size | 5 |
workers reported | 5 |
comprehensive assessment | 5 |
highly infectious | 5 |
normally distributed | 5 |
van der | 5 |
first study | 5 |
shadow evacuations | 5 |
interaction effects | 5 |
psychological society | 5 |
china hospital | 5 |
effect sizes | 5 |
causal relationship | 5 |
occupational stress | 5 |
gender difference | 5 |
age range | 5 |
solitary coping | 5 |
positive affect | 5 |
ijerph sha | 5 |
occurring psychological | 5 |
trauma exposure | 5 |
exploratory phase | 5 |
anxiety stress | 5 |
solitary comfort | 5 |
intellectual content | 5 |
pay attention | 5 |
clinical features | 5 |
pilot study | 5 |
will increase | 5 |
uninfected staff | 5 |
watching television | 4 |
term psychiatric | 4 |
study adds | 4 |
respondents confirmed | 4 |
distress symptoms | 4 |
setting towards | 4 |
sir model | 4 |
valid questionnaires | 4 |
social contagion | 4 |
professionals working | 4 |
average score | 4 |
mainland chinese | 4 |
total variance | 4 |
human behavior | 4 |
relations among | 4 |
chest ct | 4 |
online self | 4 |
medical conditions | 4 |
hansen ghafoori | 4 |
also includes | 4 |
social identity | 4 |
indicating greater | 4 |
symptoms may | 4 |
descriptive study | 4 |
virus spread | 4 |
using wmd | 4 |
infection route | 4 |
three dimensions | 4 |
high stress | 4 |
social supports | 4 |
across different | 4 |
also need | 4 |
outbreak immediate | 4 |
grateful students | 4 |
respiratory infectious | 4 |
factors among | 4 |
develop new | 4 |
study shows | 4 |
psychiatry doi | 4 |
proactive behavior | 4 |
general mainland | 4 |
ptsd among | 4 |
mean response | 4 |
resources model | 4 |
one might | 4 |
regression coefficients | 4 |
psychological challenges | 4 |
negative life | 4 |
major public | 4 |
behavioural science | 4 |
tested positive | 4 |
mobile internet | 4 |
results revealed | 4 |
brain behav | 4 |
multicenter study | 4 |
first wave | 4 |
also shown | 4 |
based resilience | 4 |
coping skills | 4 |
one week | 4 |
care setting | 4 |
profit sectors | 4 |
significantly mediated | 4 |
worded items | 4 |
mechanisms underlying | 4 |
planned behavior | 4 |
university hospital | 4 |
cov outbreak | 4 |
first confinement | 4 |
systems theory | 4 |
among students | 4 |
reported lower | 4 |
sum score | 4 |
government instructions | 4 |
public policy | 4 |
related stigma | 4 |
resilience among | 4 |
employee perceptions | 4 |
first time | 4 |
patients experience | 4 |
important intellectual | 4 |
chinese male | 4 |
jiangsu university | 4 |
providing psychological | 4 |
support wuhan | 4 |
psychiatric morbidities | 4 |
autonomous regions | 4 |
core group | 4 |
provide support | 4 |
treatment response | 4 |
face communication | 4 |
brief symptom | 4 |
influences psychological | 4 |
social determinants | 4 |
significant impact | 4 |
promote sustained | 4 |
epidemic contact | 4 |
media briefing | 4 |
work experience | 4 |
feel psychologically | 4 |
face interviews | 4 |
intervention measures | 4 |
clinical work | 4 |
analysis indicated | 4 |
vif values | 4 |
also highlighted | 4 |
provider behaviour | 4 |
quarantined hemodialysis | 4 |
health promotion | 4 |
pandemic among | 4 |
virus outbreaks | 4 |
epidemic area | 4 |
resettlement problem | 4 |
oslo social | 4 |
respiratory distress | 4 |
will require | 4 |
age groups | 4 |
study using | 4 |
belief model | 4 |
population sample | 4 |
significant predictor | 4 |
positive effect | 4 |
research ethics | 4 |
standard errors | 4 |
distress across | 4 |
variable model | 4 |
information related | 4 |
mindfulness training | 4 |
influence entrepreneurial | 4 |
among participants | 4 |
participants completed | 4 |
health impact | 4 |
autonomous cities | 4 |
home orders | 4 |
study makes | 4 |
survey component | 4 |
study findings | 4 |
psychological panic | 4 |
unique associations | 4 |
higher perceived | 4 |
gratitude moderates | 4 |
anxiety regarding | 4 |
empower society | 4 |
morbidities among | 4 |
regarding covid | 4 |
past week | 4 |
ethics approval | 4 |
uk prime | 4 |
mediational analyses | 4 |
external funding | 4 |
patients infected | 4 |
statistical results | 4 |
health alert | 4 |
related variables | 4 |
many individuals | 4 |
examine psychological | 4 |
perceived severity | 4 |
related deaths | 4 |
alcohol misuse | 4 |
health score | 4 |
excluded due | 4 |
behavioral problems | 4 |
survey research | 4 |
brief depression | 4 |
four items | 4 |
adverse events | 4 |
current epidemic | 4 |
household composition | 4 |
fit index | 4 |
information regarding | 4 |
preventative measures | 4 |
also included | 4 |
answer options | 4 |
significantly related | 4 |
clinical symptoms | 4 |
observable behaviours | 4 |
osama bin | 4 |
reliability estimate | 4 |
healthcare settings | 4 |
sustained psychological | 4 |
containment strategies | 4 |
members feel | 4 |
domestic violence | 4 |
psychological treatment | 4 |
south china | 4 |
staff working | 4 |
short form | 4 |
major depression | 4 |
brief form | 4 |
statistical considerations | 4 |
social restrictions | 4 |
baseline data | 4 |
study indicate | 4 |
virus infection | 4 |
patients reported | 4 |
symptoms experienced | 4 |
reported symptom | 4 |
safe place | 4 |
key sociodemographic | 4 |
days prior | 4 |
reaction questionnaire | 4 |
feature selection | 4 |
satisfaction among | 4 |
hurricane andrew | 4 |
shelter building | 4 |
negatively affects | 4 |
logistics departments | 4 |
emotional support | 4 |
international concern | 4 |
important implications | 4 |
last month | 4 |
styles may | 4 |
related problems | 4 |
included participants | 4 |
emotions experienced | 4 |
comfortable speaking | 4 |
criminal justice | 4 |
variables related | 4 |
attachment styles | 4 |
ongoing efforts | 4 |
beijing sars | 4 |
positive association | 4 |
deteriorated physical | 4 |
significant variables | 4 |
pandemic affect | 4 |
used multiple | 4 |
methodology used | 4 |
independent samples | 4 |
different coping | 4 |
distress compared | 4 |
developing countries | 4 |
adverse consequences | 4 |
least one | 4 |
reported high | 4 |
whether people | 4 |
healthcare employees | 4 |
stress scales | 4 |
nuanced understanding | 4 |
mediation analysis | 4 |
respondents based | 4 |
important risk | 4 |
younger adults | 4 |
process macro | 4 |
attitudes toward | 4 |
nsw dpi | 4 |
known data | 4 |
general practitioners | 4 |
trait anxiety | 4 |
medical system | 4 |
pandemic mental | 4 |
analysis model | 4 |
scores ranging | 4 |
among postgraduate | 4 |
previously used | 4 |
psychological workers | 4 |
joining front | 4 |
phones may | 4 |
tarpaulin rooms | 4 |
distress following | 4 |
significant effect | 4 |
target psychological | 4 |
absolute values | 4 |
next month | 4 |
increasing number | 4 |
clinical practice | 4 |
biological markers | 4 |
multiple independent | 4 |
crisis situation | 4 |
emotional response | 4 |
one considers | 4 |
coping mechanisms | 4 |
positive attitude | 4 |
outbreaks like | 4 |
ml models | 4 |
potentially contaminated | 4 |
mediation effects | 4 |
symptom checklist | 4 |
moderating mechanisms | 4 |
greater distress | 4 |
supplementary information | 4 |
ongoing covid | 4 |
situation report | 4 |
deteriorating physical | 4 |
resulting composite | 4 |
ncov outbreak | 4 |
clinical concern | 4 |
economic consequences | 4 |
psychological suffering | 4 |
one symptom | 4 |
medical work | 4 |
outbreak response | 4 |
health states | 4 |
whose self | 4 |
increasing psychological | 4 |
difficult situations | 4 |
participants received | 4 |
china dealing | 4 |
hospital psychiatry | 4 |
staff involved | 4 |
previously mentioned | 4 |
empowerment among | 4 |
will take | 4 |
adjusted odds | 4 |
entrepreneurial orientation | 4 |
bin laden | 4 |
backward stepwise | 4 |
distress associated | 4 |
economic crisis | 4 |
report measure | 4 |
related symptoms | 4 |
supplementary table | 4 |
phone users | 4 |
care among | 4 |
less social | 4 |
outbreak psychological | 4 |
financial stress | 4 |
different countries | 4 |
uk government | 4 |
study psychological | 4 |
chronic stress | 4 |
material suspected | 4 |
rumination may | 4 |
team support | 4 |
providing support | 4 |
severity measure | 4 |
adapted measure | 4 |
participants gave | 4 |
less resilient | 4 |
conducted within | 4 |
work behavior | 4 |
benight harper | 4 |
comparative fit | 4 |
pandemic period | 4 |
study mental | 4 |
resilience level | 4 |
analytical results | 4 |
among disaster | 4 |
retest reliability | 4 |
focal variables | 4 |
work purposes | 4 |
target audience | 4 |
outside activities | 4 |
business intentions | 4 |
telephone survey | 4 |
social psychology | 4 |
media consumption | 4 |
social interaction | 4 |
negative social | 4 |
community psychological | 4 |
work together | 4 |
health difficulties | 4 |
power analysis | 4 |
south wales | 4 |
term goals | 4 |
permanent resettlement | 4 |
safety concerns | 4 |
major challenges | 4 |
also show | 4 |
severe cases | 4 |
increased psychiatric | 4 |
situational demands | 4 |
health factors | 4 |
new south | 4 |
epidemic data | 4 |
coronavirus infection | 4 |
emotional experiences | 4 |
first step | 4 |
burnout among | 4 |
health strategies | 4 |
next weeks | 4 |
normal distribution | 4 |
human resource | 4 |
took place | 4 |
mild anxiety | 4 |
related issues | 4 |
cronbach alpha | 4 |
risk perceptions | 4 |
protective behavior | 4 |
personal experience | 4 |
cognitive evaluation | 4 |
mental healthcare | 4 |
whose main | 4 |
epidemic outbreaks | 4 |
china found | 4 |
responses within | 4 |
terrorist event | 4 |
social distance | 4 |
within month | 4 |
primary industries | 4 |
flexibility demonstrated | 4 |
first two | 4 |
may explain | 4 |
service behavior | 4 |
buffering effect | 4 |
proposed model | 4 |
member said | 4 |
panic among | 4 |
healthy control | 4 |
health officials | 4 |
key research | 4 |
psychological difficulties | 4 |
sex differences | 4 |
protective gear | 4 |
higher stress | 4 |
problems may | 4 |
mediator variable | 4 |
square error | 4 |
recent years | 4 |
survey design | 4 |
operation center | 4 |
emergency operation | 4 |
much sleep | 4 |
negative consequences | 4 |
sustained behaviour | 4 |
frequently occurring | 4 |
responses towards | 4 |
lower prevalence | 4 |
safe environment | 4 |
psychological reports | 4 |
health threat | 4 |
integral part | 4 |
four weeks | 4 |
hemodialysis patients | 4 |
efficacy scale | 4 |
highly contagious | 4 |
induced psychological | 4 |
dispositional traits | 4 |
well understood | 4 |
lagos state | 4 |
multivariate outliers | 4 |
critical care | 4 |
initial validation | 4 |
screening instrument | 4 |
study provided | 4 |
three times | 4 |
qualitative analysis | 4 |
ecological systems | 4 |
job opportunities | 4 |
terrorist groups | 4 |
working environment | 4 |
control study | 4 |
young women | 4 |
problem solving | 4 |
medical error | 4 |
qualitative studies | 4 |
human development | 4 |
subjective experience | 4 |
screening scales | 4 |
contagion curve | 4 |
among turkish | 4 |
need frustration | 4 |
psychosocial effects | 4 |
supportive responses | 4 |
health research | 4 |
much higher | 4 |
environmental psychology | 4 |
health issue | 4 |
made available | 4 |
white zones | 4 |
increasing function | 4 |
received psychological | 4 |
second model | 4 |
first affiliated | 4 |
show higher | 4 |
worth noting | 4 |
external locus | 4 |
studies included | 4 |
survey completion | 4 |
optimization model | 4 |
adverse situation | 4 |
spss inc | 4 |
psychological growth | 4 |
basic characteristics | 4 |
may result | 4 |
duan zhu | 4 |
predictive variables | 4 |
senior medical | 4 |
final version | 4 |
among patients | 4 |
higher number | 4 |
considering panic | 4 |
reported experiencing | 4 |
community sample | 4 |
student status | 4 |
kaohsiung medical | 4 |
one third | 4 |
may last | 4 |
world mental | 4 |
seven dimensions | 4 |
temporal separation | 4 |
health organisation | 4 |
four variables | 4 |
northern ireland | 4 |
also proved | 4 |
research implications | 4 |
higher distress | 4 |
anxiety scale | 4 |
size effect | 4 |
stepwise multiple | 4 |
industry council | 4 |
frontline medical | 4 |
epidemics occurring | 4 |
entire sample | 4 |
preventive programs | 4 |
rigorous research | 4 |
study examined | 4 |
rated health | 4 |
emergency response | 4 |
health problem | 4 |
much better | 4 |
random sampling | 4 |
academic performance | 4 |
eligibility criteria | 4 |
emotional health | 4 |
may use | 4 |
published elsewhere | 4 |
west africa | 4 |
special attention | 4 |
uncertain situations | 4 |
based interventions | 4 |
also considered | 4 |
study show | 4 |
confinement measures | 4 |
drinks rr | 4 |
case management | 4 |
spss macro | 4 |
randomized controlled | 4 |
wuhan university | 4 |
higher frequency | 4 |
negative mood | 4 |
significant role | 4 |
related anxiety | 4 |
participants included | 4 |
increased social | 4 |
item questionnaire | 4 |
typical occasion | 4 |
per week | 4 |
variance inflation | 4 |
psychological therapies | 4 |
long time | 4 |
emerging virus | 4 |
supportive behaviour | 4 |
final manuscript | 4 |
general psychological | 4 |
vice versa | 4 |
psychosocial contagion | 4 |
perceived self | 4 |
negatively affect | 4 |
affected population | 4 |
also demonstrated | 4 |
current status | 4 |
psychological problem | 4 |
distress amongst | 4 |
better understanding | 4 |
participants rated | 4 |
participants filled | 4 |
early report | 4 |
correlation coefficient | 4 |
italian version | 4 |
ibm spss | 4 |
work hours | 4 |
one year | 4 |
via prolific | 4 |
recruiting participants | 4 |
normative data | 4 |
chinese nurses | 4 |
multiple logistic | 4 |
many medical | 4 |
three days | 4 |
outbreak mental | 4 |
income coefficient | 4 |
measures used | 4 |
increased significantly | 4 |
response scales | 4 |
high rates | 4 |
regulation strategies | 4 |
pilot testing | 4 |
prospective study | 4 |
information sources | 4 |
family practice | 4 |
future interventions | 4 |
shattered assumptions | 4 |
thousand oaks | 4 |
decision making | 4 |
high reliability | 4 |
path coefficients | 4 |
romantic partner | 4 |
online services | 4 |
prevalence rates | 4 |
literature suggests | 4 |
also noted | 4 |
randomly selected | 4 |
study contributes | 4 |
broad areas | 4 |
descriptive analysis | 4 |
particularly among | 4 |
pandemic research | 4 |
first three | 4 |
minimum sample | 4 |
rapidly changing | 4 |
research study | 4 |
psychological states | 4 |
access article | 4 |
information available | 4 |
times week | 4 |
one child | 4 |
feel comfortable | 4 |
significant associations | 4 |
staff experienced | 4 |
growth among | 4 |
showed good | 4 |
unique opportunity | 4 |
social relationships | 4 |
australian horse | 4 |
create fear | 4 |
extremely high | 4 |
team setting | 4 |
data across | 4 |
psychometric analysis | 4 |
relationship among | 4 |
vulnerable group | 4 |
subjective life | 4 |
article distributed | 4 |
drinking occasion | 4 |
users may | 4 |
affected people | 4 |
peer review | 4 |
ad hoc | 4 |
using ibm | 4 |
constructive atmosphere | 3 |
behav doi | 3 |
standardized root | 3 |
people feel | 3 |
higher incomes | 3 |
personal abilities | 3 |
term effects | 3 |
life event | 3 |
explained variance | 3 |
never wore | 3 |
various physical | 3 |
ml algorithms | 3 |
individuals exposed | 3 |
analysis also | 3 |
quality data | 3 |
correlational analyses | 3 |
medical systems | 3 |
advisory group | 3 |
members found | 3 |
respiratory infection | 3 |
three participants | 3 |
participants aged | 3 |
higher capacity | 3 |
high internal | 3 |
prevent psychological | 3 |
empirical review | 3 |
occupational factors | 3 |
global mental | 3 |
response team | 3 |
psychosomatic individuals | 3 |
behavioural responses | 3 |
new perspectives | 3 |
thinking throughout | 3 |
garda officials | 3 |
participants responded | 3 |
van dyne | 3 |
algerian population | 3 |
highest ranked | 3 |
public response | 3 |
psychiatric disorder | 3 |
hours per | 3 |
create psychological | 3 |
job performance | 3 |
behaviours displayed | 3 |
main results | 3 |
medical expenses | 3 |
initial time | 3 |
shown good | 3 |
social anxiety | 3 |
extremely difficult | 3 |
preceding month | 3 |
replenishment capability | 3 |
task conflict | 3 |
maintain good | 3 |
consistency reliability | 3 |
asq confidence | 3 |
five personality | 3 |
psychological rehabilitation | 3 |
edinburgh mental | 3 |
summed score | 3 |
considerable impact | 3 |
quarantine measures | 3 |
past psychiatric | 3 |
nembhard edmondson | 3 |
among ebola | 3 |
following chernobyl | 3 |
information accompanies | 3 |
statistical software | 3 |
square structural | 3 |
based approaches | 3 |
ibm corp | 3 |
physical exhaustion | 3 |
resilience factors | 3 |
subthreshold insomnia | 3 |
also collected | 3 |
people often | 3 |
previous investigations | 3 |
new businesses | 3 |
intentions among | 3 |
unknown etiology | 3 |
depression subscales | 3 |
preventive measure | 3 |
support system | 3 |
infected family | 3 |
individual interviews | 3 |
red cross | 3 |
enforcement officers | 3 |
also investigated | 3 |
short term | 3 |
order factor | 3 |
multicenter cross | 3 |
high percentage | 3 |
survey study | 3 |
work best | 3 |
epidemic severity | 3 |
structural mediation | 3 |
global reach | 3 |
correlation matrix | 3 |
justice professionals | 3 |
guangdong province | 3 |
become infected | 3 |
reduced levels | 3 |
safe space | 3 |
asks participants | 3 |
feel fear | 3 |
invisible toxins | 3 |
bodily sensations | 3 |
highest level | 3 |
main outcome | 3 |
human bond | 3 |
sampling approach | 3 |
traditional psychotherapy | 3 |
patients also | 3 |
mental states | 3 |
negative biopsychosocial | 3 |
using data | 3 |
information concerning | 3 |
main variables | 3 |
limited research | 3 |
feedback session | 3 |
must first | 3 |
minority ethnic | 3 |
present psychological | 3 |
single item | 3 |
dynamic evacuation | 3 |
family support | 3 |
directly affects | 3 |
also evaluated | 3 |
behavior therapy | 3 |
reading books | 3 |
security measures | 3 |
enduring psychological | 3 |
isi scores | 3 |
psychiatric illnesses | 3 |
also significantly | 3 |
one thing | 3 |
people experiencing | 3 |
health resources | 3 |
relatively large | 3 |
personal relationships | 3 |
individual level | 3 |
sleep disturbance | 3 |
level factors | 3 |
adverse impact | 3 |
significant proportion | 3 |
model provided | 3 |
practical considerations | 3 |
facebook survey | 3 |
adequate psychosocial | 3 |
psychological implications | 3 |
depression subscale | 3 |
moscow subway | 3 |
psychosocial consequences | 3 |
also occur | 3 |
especially psychological | 3 |
older ones | 3 |
recovery period | 3 |
respondents say | 3 |
greater number | 3 |
reason may | 3 |
experiencing high | 3 |
factors contributing | 3 |
period following | 3 |
contact free | 3 |
investigate whether | 3 |
within team | 3 |
developing new | 3 |
screened positively | 3 |
among different | 3 |
social life | 3 |
concerns related | 3 |
assessing coping | 3 |
less confidence | 3 |
disinhibition effect | 3 |
research studies | 3 |
people adhere | 3 |
dispositional self | 3 |
fear states | 3 |
based study | 3 |
life sciences | 3 |
including physicians | 3 |
societal changes | 3 |
bootstrap method | 3 |
daily habits | 3 |
action questionnaire | 3 |
cognitive behavior | 3 |
fold cross | 3 |
severe level | 3 |
addressing mental | 3 |
distress issues | 3 |
psychological medicine | 3 |
i wonder | 3 |
predictive factors | 3 |
might limit | 3 |
commons licence | 3 |
adult health | 3 |
emotional intelligence | 3 |
authors read | 3 |
help reduce | 3 |
life among | 3 |
supplementary material | 3 |
two control | 3 |
also experienced | 3 |
talking heads | 3 |
moving forward | 3 |
develop ptsd | 3 |
english language | 3 |
similar findings | 3 |
infection rates | 3 |
well documented | 3 |
mass terrorism | 3 |
sound mental | 3 |
negative mental | 3 |
strong internal | 3 |
sustainable performance | 3 |
industry sector | 3 |
longitudinal design | 3 |
sample includes | 3 |
correlation tests | 3 |
bmc public | 3 |
depressed mood | 3 |
research centre | 3 |
random forest | 3 |
protective behaviours | 3 |
carlos title | 3 |
hiv stigma | 3 |
takes place | 3 |
younger nurses | 3 |
bioterror attack | 3 |
perceived danger | 3 |
sample reported | 3 |
psychiatric diagnosis | 3 |
italian study | 3 |
potential conflict | 3 |
practical implications | 3 |
significant direct | 3 |
wider spectrum | 3 |
uk nation | 3 |
identified amongst | 3 |
early days | 3 |
analysis mental | 3 |
survey methodology | 3 |
point scales | 3 |
disaster psychological | 3 |
external factors | 3 |
report questionnaires | 3 |
whilst supporting | 3 |
original author | 3 |
reported physical | 3 |
effectively control | 3 |
evd infection | 3 |
bias may | 3 |
cfa models | 3 |
indirect model | 3 |
made substantial | 3 |
unit increase | 3 |
control scale | 3 |
short duration | 3 |
solitude refers | 3 |
biological attack | 3 |
inform future | 3 |
following ways | 3 |
system involvement | 3 |
underlying mechanism | 3 |
drinking motives | 3 |
employee empowerment | 3 |
typical drinks | 3 |
funding agencies | 3 |
primary needs | 3 |
digital devices | 3 |
tertiary hospital | 3 |
including age | 3 |
means extremely | 3 |
help improve | 3 |
home except | 3 |
disaster response | 3 |
front psychol | 3 |
line healthcare | 3 |
alone scale | 3 |
mutual trust | 3 |
services provided | 3 |
interviews captured | 3 |
items regarding | 3 |
study date | 3 |
better results | 3 |
senior postgraduate | 3 |
clinical populations | 3 |
stress reduction | 3 |
government intervention | 3 |
control groups | 3 |
six months | 3 |
interviews indicated | 3 |
secondary disasters | 3 |
consistency coefficient | 3 |
imbalance problem | 3 |
resettlement decisions | 3 |
critical period | 3 |
symptom inventory | 3 |
analysis results | 3 |
explore whether | 3 |
health needs | 3 |
read books | 3 |
depressive temperaments | 3 |
standard scores | 3 |
health measures | 3 |
frontline professionals | 3 |
important roles | 3 |
social environment | 3 |
new organization | 3 |
reporting high | 3 |
toxic exposure | 3 |
employment status | 3 |
individual difference | 3 |
psychosocial response | 3 |
sustainable development | 3 |
past epidemics | 3 |
using skewness | 3 |
surveyed population | 3 |
one day | 3 |
regulation scale | 3 |
many mental | 3 |
main source | 3 |
sampling strategy | 3 |
pandemic affected | 3 |
also related | 3 |
acute covid | 3 |
mental stress | 3 |
equation modelling | 3 |
amid covid | 3 |
effective coping | 3 |
narrative synthesis | 3 |
economic activity | 3 |
clinical researchers | 3 |
narrative review | 3 |
first model | 3 |
mostly focused | 3 |
efficient response | 3 |
global epidemic | 3 |
disease progression | 3 |
towards emerging | 3 |
used psychological | 3 |
may serve | 3 |
issues like | 3 |
cronbach coefficient | 3 |
digital interventions | 3 |
main effect | 3 |
reactive model | 3 |
current research | 3 |
policy research | 3 |
safety literature | 3 |
proposed method | 3 |
prepare ahead | 3 |
previous model | 3 |
similar meetings | 3 |
clinicians may | 3 |
effective strategies | 3 |
close family | 3 |
mass terrorist | 3 |
baseline characteristics | 3 |
study explored | 3 |
markedly affect | 3 |
univariate logistic | 3 |
studies suggested | 3 |
may feel | 3 |
thematic review | 3 |