This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.
identifier | question |
---|---|
A36128 | eng Lunsford, Thomas,-- Sir, 1610?-1653? |
A56169 | How then can they call it Old, or the Good Old Man or Cause, without a contradiction and absurdity? |
A61735 | To Ireland, said they, why? |
A41361 | Can his Holiness, think you, dispense with that pain, Or by his Indulgences raise them again? |
A41361 | He may give them leave, To Lye and Dece ● ve; But what when the Rope do''s of Life them bereave? |
A41361 | T''every one of these men The Jesuits brought( 27) Ten, To dispro ● e''em in Time and in Place; but what then? |
A42971 | ''T is false and absur''d, Wou''d th''Godly hang Papists for Interest or Pique? |
A42971 | My Witnesses I bring, and produced the Record, D''ye think th''are Perjur''d? |
A42971 | Wou''d a Doctor Swear false for Ten Pound a Week? |
A33406 | Ah now what is become of all our subtilty? |
A33406 | And now, what can we do more? |
A33406 | And was not this answered like himself, think you, my sons? |
A33406 | Now Sirs, why should not we prevail as well as this deceiver, whom for example I have mentioned to you my Children? |
A33406 | have not we as many Motives, as plausible Rhetoricians to perswade? |
A14924 | Shall we therefore that are his subiects, be discouraged, hauing so couragious a King? |
A14924 | Thē they demaunded, For what purpose? |
A14924 | Whereupon, the Uicar of the Parish being asked whether he would bury her? |
A09493 | And being demanded why he Baptized them? |
A09493 | The King himselfe asked them whether they were Christians or no? |
A09493 | the Father answered: why doth the King inforce Christians to forsake their faith, and become Mahometans? |
A38185 | And it shall come to pass, when your Children shall say unto you, What mean you by this Service? |
A38185 | But are these things according to the Gospel of Peace? |
A38185 | I know he calls the Bread his Body, but then he calls the Cup his Bloud, and shall one be allowed to be a figure, and not the other? |
A38185 | Is it not strange that Christ should eat himself, and that all the Disciples should eat him alive before the Jews had Crucified him? |
A38185 | Must the Pope cut off Heads because St. Peter cut off an Ear? |
A38185 | Now should I in the language of this Scripture come to the Common People at the celebration of the Mass, and say, What mean you by this Service? |
A38185 | What satisfactory answer can be expected? |
A38185 | You know the Devil could tempt our Saviour in Scripture language, shall we therefore expunge these Scriptures because the Devil used them? |
A68099 | At the opening whereof, what a Chaos? |
A68099 | Haue the gates of death beene opened vnto thee? |
A68099 | Quis talia fando Temperet à lachrymis? |
A68099 | Who can to the life expresse the face of Death, presenting it selfe in so ruefull and different shapes? |
A68099 | or hast thou seene the doares of the shadow of death? |
A68099 | what fearefull obiects? |
A68099 | what lamentable representations? |
A67231 | ''T is, indeed, a very sad thing; but( Gentlemen) if you will not do it your selves, Who can distinguish you? |
A67231 | 1. de Clericis) They stand not bound to the Laws of any Prince coactively; but directively onely? |
A67231 | Ask him further, What if they will not be directed, but tread those Laws under their feet? |
A67231 | Ask him, How we can be assured that his Catholicks will prove good Subjects? |
A67231 | But what if they should chance( and what has been may be) to be found ingaged in Treason? |
A67231 | But what say they to the Laity? |
A67231 | Would Ambrose have slipt so, as to have writ, Non habent haereditatem Petri, qui fidem Petri non habent? |
A67231 | Would B ● sil have assigned to Alexandria, and Antioch, a better title to the succession of Peter? |
A67231 | Would Heirome have said, Pari omnes, inter se Authoritate fuisse Apostolos? |
A67231 | Would the third Councill of Carthage( wherein St. Augustine was present) have past a Decree, That none should be stiled Head, or Prince of Priests? |
A53453 | But if P. W. object, that if his Majesty were under an obligation preceding and opposite to theirs, why did he enter into an obligation unto them? |
A53453 | But if all were pardoned by the peace made in 1648. why does he remember the Judgements for the breaches in 1646? |
A53453 | Can his Majesty trust them, if they be not faithful to their Conscience- ingagement? |
A53453 | Countrey- men, when his Majesties free Election of a chief Governor, and such a one as the Duke of Ormond is, can not do it? |
A53453 | For if the flame be so in the green Tree ▪ what will it be in the dry? |
A53453 | If, I say, all this be not true, why does P. W. say it? |
A53453 | Suppose all be involved in one Common guilt, is the eye of P. W. evil, because his Majesties is good? |
A53453 | and if they be, can he trust them when their Consciences ingage them to his Enemy? |
A53453 | if he did, why was it printed? |
A53453 | if he thinks all were not, why does he not remember the breaches made in 1641. and at least attribute some of those Judgements to that breach? |
A53453 | if it be true, what can others expect? |
A53453 | or, is there any necessity to extend the same Grace to all; or to render a Reason, where onely Grace makes the difference? |
A80451 | And by whom? |
A80451 | And in whose Troop, Company, or Ward so admitted? |
A80451 | And where the said Arms now are? |
A80451 | What now deteynes them there? |
A80451 | What occasions called them thither? |
A80451 | What their names and sirnames are, and of what sept or kindred they be? |
A80451 | Whence they came? |
A80451 | Where they now lodge, and since their coming to Town have lodged either in the houses of Papists or Protestants? |
A34722 | And what is the cause, that after so many yeares of preaching of the Gospell, that the common people still retaine a sent of the Roman perfume? |
A34722 | But whence shall the streame follow that must feed this bounty? |
A34722 | How can we draw others to our Church; if we can not agree, where, or how to lay our Foundation? |
A34722 | What was the cause why the Spartans continued their governmēt so many Revolutions of times, without mutations? |
A34722 | ],[ London? |
A33346 | 12.11, 12, 14, 26, 27. saith Moses to them, when your Children shall say unto you, What mean you by this service? |
A33346 | But Do ye thus requite the Lord, O foolish people, and unwise? |
A33346 | How many such Snakes have we amongst us, that return evil for good, and unkindness for kindness? |
A33346 | Is not he thy Father? |
A33346 | Is not this to fight against God, with his own weapons? |
A33346 | O our God, wilt thou not judge them? |
A33346 | SPaines King with Navies great the Seas bestrew''d, T''augment with English Crown his Spanish sway: Ask ye what caus''d this proud attempt? |
A33346 | STraverat innumeris Hispanus classibus aequor, Regnis juncturus Sceptra Britana suis Tanti hujus rogitas quae motus causa? |
A33346 | Shall Haman, whilest he practising to destroy all the people of God, be hanged on a Gallows fifty foot high, which he had prepared for Mordecai? |
A33346 | Shall Herod, whilest he is priding himself in the flattering applanse of the people, be eaten of worms? |
A33346 | Shall Nebuchadnezzar, while he is vaunting of his great Babylon, be berest of his wits? |
A33346 | Shall the House where the Philistins met together to sport with Sampson, fall upon their heads? |
A33346 | Should we not remember that good turns aggravate unkindnesses, and our offences are not a little encreased by our obligations? |
A33346 | What then may we judge of those persons in our daies, who labour to extenuate, yea annihilate these deliverances? |
A33346 | You can not be ignorant how things proceed? |
A33346 | and in thine hand is there not power and might, so that none is able to withstand thee? |
A33346 | and rulest not thou over all the Kingdoms of the Earth? |
A33346 | as David did against Goliah: as Jehu did against Jehoram: and as Benhadad did against Ahab, with that life that he had lately given him? |
A33346 | how ordinary an evil is this among us, to abuse our deliverances to Gods''dishonour? |
A33346 | that would have no publick commemorations of them, that study how to invalidate them, and to blot out the remembrance of them? |
A35564 | 333. in proportion to their number and what is that, among so many millions of other men? |
A35564 | And have not you well deserved of Christianity? |
A35564 | But durst you, even now, undertake, that every twentieth or fiftieth man, or woman generally, among you, is able to give an account of their Faith? |
A35564 | But what say you, if I can help you in this also? |
A35564 | Do not you forbid your adversaries, to use dead testimonies,( that is, Fathers and Councils:) or some book granted to be sacred? |
A35564 | Do not you upon that account, exclude Christs promise to his Church? |
A35564 | Have not you told us many times you admit of nothing, to have any part in the rule of faith but Oral Tradition? |
A35564 | So in England: How elsewhere? |
A35564 | So now: Will you have a fight of former times, from unquestionable Records? |
A35564 | The fourth, Whether he had not married one, that had been married before; or a Widow? |
A35564 | The second, Whether he had not lain with a Nun? |
A35564 | The third, with a Beast? |
A35564 | Then secondly, injuriously uncivill: in what? |
A35564 | This, the way, and the onely way God hath appointed, and Mankind must trust unto? |
A35564 | Who hath not heard of that admirable or regeneration of Learning, by all kind of Writers, since, or about that time, so much extolled and magnified? |
A51173 | And didst not thou thereupon affirm, that thy Vows were in Heaven, and thy Letters and Promises on Earth to binde thee to do it? |
A51173 | And didst thou not conceive it, promise it, vow it, swear it, and receive the Sacrament that thou wouldst do it? |
A51173 | And that therewith, and upon some Speeches used by her Majesty, thou didst turn about and weep bitterly to thy self? |
A51173 | And wouldest thou have run into such fear as thou didst confess that thou wert in, when thou didst utter it, if thou hadst never meant it? |
A51173 | Didst thou not confess this? |
A51173 | For how suddainly had we been taken and surprized when it we lest suspected, had it not been for Captain Flemming? |
A51173 | For if that be true, where are then his Vows which he said were in Heaven, his Letter and Promise upon Earth? |
A51173 | How can we believe that thou now sayest? |
A51173 | I asked him, How will you escape forth of the Garden? |
A51173 | It containeth but the parts that have been openly read, I pray you tell me? |
A51173 | She hath sought, said he, your ruine and overthrow, why should you not then seek to revenge it? |
A51173 | Sometimes I said to my self, Why should I care for her? |
A51173 | Then said the Lord Hunsdon, Sayest thou now, that thou didst never mean to kill the Queen? |
A51173 | These be the matters you must look to, what say you to them? |
A51173 | This being now resolved on, there arose a great Question, who should have the Honor of the first going in? |
A51173 | Was not this true? |
A51173 | What meanest thou by that, said Master Vice- Chamberlain? |
A51173 | What reason canst thou shew for thy self? |
A51173 | What sayest thou, William Parry, Art thou guilty of these Treasons whereof thou standest here Indicted, or not guilty? |
A51173 | Why hath he stollen out of the Popes shop so large an Indulgence and plenary Remission of all his Sins, and meant to perform nothing that he promised? |
A51173 | Why was he so specially prayed for and remembred at the Altar? |
A51173 | Why was his Devotion and Zeal so highly commended? |
A51173 | have I not spent 10000 Marks since I knew her service, and never had peny by her? |
A51173 | what hath she done for me? |
A07806 | * Vt i ● gulent homines, surgunt de nocte Latrones: vt teipsum serues non expergisceris? |
A07806 | 466. g Illinc clament, viue Rex, quem nè salutare possint, nec in d ● mum suam recipere? |
A07806 | And doe not the most of that Sect canonize in their conceits all such popish ones, as haue been executed for manifest treasons? |
A07806 | And what of this? |
A07806 | But how if he be not excommunicate by name? |
A07806 | But what if Kings will not inthrall themselues to the Popes authoritie? |
A07806 | But why? |
A07806 | By whom are they freed? |
A07806 | Christianae imminet,& vbi nouus hostis viget, multo quàm Turca infestior, eò potius cursum conuertere oportet? |
A07806 | Durst these Inginers doe any such thing without direction from their priests? |
A07806 | Father Parsons( in his Dolman) a principall Rector in the Seminarie at Rome? |
A07806 | How so? |
A07806 | How? |
A07806 | In quos vestrūm; populum exastuantem contra vos, insurgere solicita ● ● mus? |
A07806 | Is it a wonder any should wonder that a Monke could murder a mortall King? |
A07806 | Or whose death did wee euer conspire? |
A07806 | Quid cogitas? |
A07806 | Satisfie vs yet in one question more: Suppose that the Protestant Prince haue a iust quarrell: what then? |
A07806 | Say Father Creswell is this true? |
A07806 | Say then what is to be thought of the worthines of the fact? |
A07806 | Shall we thinke that other priests can haue more loyall spirits? |
A07806 | Sometime the Prince is personallie excommunicate: what then? |
A07806 | What is this else, than to aduance a dogge to be soueraigne ouer men? |
A07806 | What other meaning can armes haue, but onely blood? |
A07806 | What shall I neede to mention Reinolds( in his Rosaeus) a Doctor of Diuinitie, and chiefest man in the English Seminarie at Rhemes? |
A07806 | With whom giue me rather leaue to marueile in your behalfe,* Why are you so easily remoued from the Gospell of Christ? |
A07806 | Yea, what though not excommunicate? |
A07806 | by Gods will counselling and approuing it? |
A07806 | c Otherwise( saith Stapleton) what do people else but euen preferre man before God? |
A07806 | f Vultis in Regno Galliae Christianissim ● Regem Proclamare Nauarraeum Caluinistam? |
A07806 | f Will ye proclaime Nauarre a Caluinist, King of the most Christian kingdome of France? |
A07806 | g Shall Catholiques pray God saue that King, whom they may not admit into their houses? |
A07806 | h For suppose( saith Father Creswell) that hee professe to bring in a more sound religion; what is this to the purpose? |
A07806 | in Angliam, cuius semen Adulterinum vix à Turcic internasci possit? |
A07806 | quibus vitae periculum attulimus? |
A34067 | 12? |
A34067 | 4? |
A34067 | And is not this notorious forgery? |
A34067 | Did not the Saxon Kings preside in all National Councils, and make Laws for Religion by the advice of their own Bishops, by their own Authority? |
A34067 | Did they discharge their Vniversal Headship well in this Concealment? |
A34067 | Did they not erect new Sees for Bishops, and change them as they saw fit? |
A34067 | Did they not invest all Bishops by delivering the Ring and Pastoral Staff t? |
A34067 | Do they not forbid things which God hath allowed, as in the case of Priests Marriage? |
A34067 | Do they not presume to dispense with the very Laws of God, in many cases of Matrimony and Divorce, of Vows, Oaths, Leagues and Contracts? |
A34067 | If they knew of them of old, why did they let them sleep so long, and suffer the Church to erre for so many years for want of them? |
A34067 | Let none( saith Epiphanius) adore Mary; but why do I mention a Woman? |
A34067 | Now we may try this by considering what are the ends of True Religion, and whether these Principles serve to advance those ends? |
A34067 | SECTION V. Whether the Roman Bishop have sufficient Authority to impose the said Opinions upon all Christian Churches? |
A34067 | Secondly, Is it not a great derogation to an Infinite and Invisible Being, to be represented by an Image, and worshipped under such Representations? |
A34067 | Secondly, Let us examine whether these Doctrines do assist you in the Devout worshipping of God? |
A34067 | Shall the Physician be said to reproach him whose disease he discovers to him b? |
A34067 | THe next Enquiry is, By what means these New Doctrines became so generally believed? |
A34067 | Thirdly, Doth not the Doctrine of Merits cast a palpable dishonour upon the glorious Redemption wrought by Jesus Christ? |
A34067 | Whether all Payments and Obedience to the Pope should not be taken away h? |
A34067 | Whether the Roman Opinions, which differ from the Church of England, be the Old Religion? |
A34067 | Whether the said Opinions tend to advance the Ends of true Religion? |
A34067 | Whether the said Opinions were not established by evil means? |
A34067 | Whether the said Opinions were not introduced for evil Ends? |
A34067 | Whether the things themselves be good in their own nature, and Parts of true Religion? |
A34067 | Why may ▪ you not take the same liberty to oppose his Decrees, that your Ancestors in all Ages have done? |
A34067 | and taking the Cup from the People? |
A34067 | do they forbid it that Priests may be more pure? |
A34067 | if not, how then came the later Popes to the knowledge of them? |
A34067 | if they were true, why doth she now reject them? |
A34067 | to support a Power which is inconsistent with the Security of the Crown, the Peace of the Kingdom, and the welfare of Private persons? |
A40452 | And shall not the Bleeding Iphigenia make the most obdurate to relent? |
A40452 | And what is don in the end? |
A40452 | And what is our lott, and share of this Tragicall play, after your Royall promisees of all favour and Protection? |
A40452 | Becanus doth declare( examining this question) an aliquando liceat invasorem praevenire& illum occidere antequam nos actu invadat? |
A40452 | But what shall I doe to a man, that hath stained his soule with the spott of herisy? |
A40452 | But will Orery tell us, with what Beame would hee have the blooddy Rebellion of Crumwell, of himselfe and the rest written? |
A40452 | By what Law are wee thus treated, and destroy''d, by that of God, or Nature, or Nations? |
A40452 | Can any oath be more horrid, or can any written wickedness ascend higher? |
A40452 | Did ever any call the faire Country of Ireland a Pest- house but this man? |
A40452 | Durus percussam morte perire sinit: Sic gentem superis fidam,& te semper amantem Rex das mactandam? |
A40452 | How is the faithfull Cittie, full of Iudgment, becom an harlott? |
A40452 | How then say men came this about? |
A40452 | How? |
A40452 | Is not this a pious gloss of a Geneua Presbiterian upon a wicked theme? |
A40452 | Now if such defense is lawfull for privat men, how much more for a Common wealth or Nation? |
A40452 | Orery all this is true, but what Illation make you of this? |
A40452 | Orery by the quarrell, wee intended to hold what of Ireland was ours, against invaders; who can blame us for this? |
A40452 | Our Eyes and harts O God are turn''d upon thee, seing men have abandon''d us; O Lord when will the day come of our Happiness? |
A40452 | Quis est qui sic humiliat sublimes reges terrae? |
A40452 | Regis an iste amor est? |
A40452 | SAnguinat ante aras hoc Iphigenia libello, Quis nisi praedurus temperet a lacrimis? |
A40452 | Shall I not vissite upon these things, saith our Lord? |
A40452 | Speak freely your minde, and tell us on what side were you when the King was murthered, of Crumwells party or the Kings? |
A40452 | This is a false Calamny, tell us Orery in what Romish University or School is this Doctrin Common? |
A40452 | Transit levites plangens; quid Samaritanus? |
A40452 | Was ever such a diffinition given of Religion? |
A40452 | What I pray is contained in that Bull, that an honest man can reprehend? |
A40452 | Whether somtyms it is lawfull for us to prevent the invader, and kill him, afore he actually invad''s us? |
A40452 | Who but a beast would call a noble and ancient Nation a beaest? |
A40452 | Why soe King David? |
A40452 | and consequently can any mercy be greater then the pardon his Majesty hath granted to the men that hartily took this oath? |
A40452 | can the mercifull brest of a Clement King endure to see soe many sad spectacles of woes, and miserys without all relief? |
A40452 | doth not hee show the spleen, and rancor of a cankered hart, in this high tone, and storme of Language against a whole Catholick Nation? |
A40452 | how could soe clement a King be induced to afflict soe loyall a people, as the Catholicks of England, and Ireland? |
A40452 | in what Catholick Court is this practice? |
A40452 | or upon such a Nation shall not my soule take revenge? |
A40452 | what did your Majesty see in us, that could render us in capable of the pardon granted to the Rebells in generall? |
A40452 | what were they then doeing? |
A40452 | where I say againe, have these men been in the dark day of your Callamitys, and adversitys? |
A40452 | who I pray are those that touched the annoyntings, and the annoynted, the Catholicks of Ireland; or Cromwells party? |
A40452 | why being Innocent doe wee suffer this contumely? |
A40452 | why came soe many poore indigint men out of England this age into this Pesthouse to make theire fortunes? |
A40452 | why left under a staine of Rebellion, the true Rebells being forgiven? |
A40452 | will not God at long running look downe, and examin these cruell proceedings? |
A40452 | would Orery have the Pope be soe madd, as to forbid his Children to defend themselves and Religion against him, and his Companions? |
A02680 | And alas what lesse can they doe? |
A02680 | And is it then good Logicke, that the Bishops may usurpe their power, and entrench upon the right of the Secular arme? |
A02680 | And so often as this hapned, what did those Prelats? |
A02680 | And why were not the rest of the Lopers clennsed, but onely Naaman the Syrian? |
A02680 | And why? |
A02680 | Are all Apostles? |
A02680 | Are all Doctors? |
A02680 | Are all Miracles? |
A02680 | Are all Prophets? |
A02680 | As how? |
A02680 | At Rome? |
A02680 | Can wee beleeve all this, and many other things no lesse strange, for the authority of one Livy, renowned in the Roman history? |
A02680 | Doe all interpret? |
A02680 | Doe all speake with tongues? |
A02680 | Goe to the pismire O sluggard, and may not the Friar be sent unto his fables of Esop, with a vade ad Esopum stulte? |
A02680 | Harris, Paul, 1573- 1635? |
A02680 | Harris, Paul, 1573- 1635? |
A02680 | Harris, Paul, 1573- 1635? |
A02680 | Have all the grace of doing cures? |
A02680 | How comes it to passe( say you) That in those which you call holy places, and have in so high an estimation,& glory so much of their miracles? |
A02680 | How is it possible, that wit, capacity, or common sense, should not avert these men from such violent and out- ragious courses against P. Harris? |
A02680 | How is it to be beleeved say some? |
A02680 | How often doe we finde in former ages? |
A02680 | How then is your sentence confirmed of which no mention is made? |
A02680 | How then now confirmed? |
A02680 | How then say I, comes it to passe? |
A02680 | How truely is it said? |
A02680 | I demaund in this case, Quid juris? |
A02680 | I say, why should I not hope these things of them? |
A02680 | I would willingly understand? |
A02680 | Is it? |
A02680 | Is it? |
A02680 | May not our Franciscans remember, that the first blast and brunt of that tempest, discharged it selfe upon their owne Cells& Oratoryes? |
A02680 | Now what was the cause why no other Widow was exempted from that famine, but only the Widow of Sarepta? |
A02680 | Of which dispositiōs, Faith is the principall? |
A02680 | Spectatum admissi risum teneatis amici? |
A02680 | That because the King will not strike, that therefore the Bishop may take the sword out of his hand, and lay about him? |
A02680 | The innumerable miracles of the holy Ermites, living in the desarts of Lybia, recounted by Theoderet in his religious history? |
A02680 | The miracles approved by S Gregory the Great in his Dialogues? |
A02680 | The miracles of many Saints, wrought at their tombes and monuments, testified by S. Augustine in his Bookes De civitate Dei? |
A02680 | The miracles reported by S. Bede in his Ecclesiasticall History& lives of Saints? |
A02680 | Was there then any insufficiencie of almighty GOD, to have supplyed these defects, or to have remedied these diseases at the memory of his Saints? |
A02680 | Well, what then? |
A02680 | What shall we say of Tarquinius Priscus the fift King of the Romans, who cut a whetstone in two parts with a rasor? |
A02680 | What then is to bee done? |
A02680 | What''s the next? |
A02680 | When as the Iewes demanded of him, Quis peccavit, hic, aut parentes ejus, ut coecus naseeretur? |
A02680 | Where shall Sempronius sue his Bond against Titius? |
A02680 | Who then be they that shall doe greater workes then our Saviour did? |
A02680 | Why? |
A02680 | but the faithfull who were to succeed in the future ages of the Church? |
A02680 | hath malice against one man so blinded their judgments, and so perverted their wills? |
A02680 | have these men so soone forgotten S. Stevens day? |
A02680 | of Meath answer this neglect, or rather contempt of the Romane command? |
A02680 | so few to be cured, or to returne home sound of winde,& lim,& in perfect health? |
A02680 | the first Hermite, and by Hilarion, recorded by S. Hierom? |
A02680 | wanted there the power of GOD, or due preparation in the Subject: Who can say so? |
A02680 | what doth the Friar? |
A02680 | what pitty is it? |
A41019 | 16 What agreement hath the Temple of God with idols? |
A41019 | 7. upon what a sandie foundation is the Romish Babell built? |
A41019 | Aggravate th ● s fact of his to the height, doth this Priest himselfe doe lesse? |
A41019 | And i ● this doctrine were never heard of before; what then? |
A41019 | And if I seeme to Protestants to be a Protestant; what am I the worse for that? |
A41019 | And if any did suffer for the same, I pray let him likewise whisper when, or in what yeere, or Kings reign? |
A41019 | And if your tribe did not finde it out before; is it a wonder? |
A41019 | And is this a piece of holynesse to goe on such dayes to a play? |
A41019 | And why should there be now more shew of evill in the act, then at that time? |
A41019 | Brownists( as I have said) have Recusancie, doth it therefore follow, that they are likewise Catholiques? |
A41019 | But doth he think that we know not what a Papist is? |
A41019 | But if povertie be scandalous, why do the Fryars by a vow of perfection, as they terme it, undertake this scandalous povertie? |
A41019 | Did Abner die a foole? |
A41019 | Die as fooles? |
A41019 | Doest thou know me? |
A41019 | Fe ● end ● m ne est ut, gentilis sacrif ● c ● t, christianus inter sit? |
A41019 | For I wonder by what law a m ● n is bound to make any other Protestation of his beliefe for the doing of a thing indifferent? |
A41019 | For a testimony against them? |
A41019 | For how can he certainly know the intention of the Bishop or Priest who administred unto him these rites, all which they account sacraments? |
A41019 | For one man may get a distinctive signe of another mans institution; shall God therefore own him? |
A41019 | For what would a man get, by hating of God? |
A41019 | For where may we finde his institution? |
A41019 | For who instituted that service to be such a signe? |
A41019 | For who made it such a signe? |
A41019 | God, or man? |
A41019 | How can there be any counsels of perfection over and above the law, when the law of Christ requireth perfection it selfe? |
A41019 | How suddenly might we be cheated of our Religion, Liberties, Lawes, yea and lives to? |
A41019 | I wonder by this kinde of conversation, what kinde of conversion could ensue? |
A41019 | If he be not knowne; how can he give more scandall, then Naaman did? |
A41019 | If they held it not, how were they saved, upon what good ground or warrant are so many of them canonized for Saints even by the Roman Church? |
A41019 | If they may be deceived as men, why not as Popes? |
A41019 | If you aske me, what is then the signe to know a Catholique from any other Sectary? |
A41019 | Is it therefore false or scandalous? |
A41019 | Let Davenport have the day of Day at Rome, what hath Sancta Clara done that in the charita ● le censure of this Priest Lucifer must have him? |
A41019 | Let them remember what Polycarp did answer when Marcion accoasting him said, Nosti me? |
A41019 | Not by institution: for if so, who instituted the same? |
A41019 | Not danger of subversion: for to what purpose should they preach subversive doctrine? |
A41019 | Now in the Protestant Churches what contumelious words are spoken against God with a minde,& c? |
A41019 | Now what obstinacie can Protestants be said to have in their opinions with relation to a Church, they know not? |
A41019 | Quo teneam vultus mutantem Protea nodo? |
A41019 | Quot millia pass ● um declamasti? |
A41019 | Sirs, know ye not, saith Demetrius, that by this craft we have our wealth? |
A41019 | So that as a man receiveth good by holy? |
A41019 | This appeares true to every meane capacitie: What danger then can there be in going to Church? |
A41019 | What care they though Recusants sinke in England, so long as they swim in abundance beyond the Sea? |
A41019 | What then becomes of works of supererogation, when a mans stock or treasure of good workes can not hold out to pay his own debts? |
A41019 | Whether it be lawfull for a Catholique to heare the Prayers, Epistles, Gospels and Psalmes of the Catholique Church among Protestants in their Church? |
A41019 | Whether it be lawfull for a Catholique to receive bare bread and wine in remembrance that Christ dyed for him, as a pious ceremony? |
A41019 | Whether it be lawfull to frequent the Churches of hereticks, where there is both imminent danger of subversion and scandall? |
A41019 | Why have ye not houses to eate and drinke in? |
A41019 | Why should we not communicate with Protestants where there can be no danger of sinne? |
A41019 | Why then recusancie being rejected, should he not professe the same? |
A41019 | Yet hence it doth not follow, that I am bound to goe into the Market place and cry out; I am a Catholike, who will punish me? |
A41019 | and how loose and weake is the maine ground of a Papists faith? |
A41019 | and presently judge them as fallen men whom they dislike? |
A41019 | and to goe to Sermons as to a play to make themselves merry, and dispell a Melancholly dumpe? |
A41019 | and whether not better, so taken, then without such remembrance? |
A41019 | and who can say his heart is cleane from all these? |
A41019 | are they Friers secular Priests, or Devils that thus spit fire one at another? |
A41019 | d With what face can he say that the Protestants are incredulous and beleeve not the truth? |
A41019 | e Is this the holy Romane Religion, to make a May- game of Religion? |
A41019 | g Will you call it the same wine which was powred out into two cups, whereof one hath store of rats- bane in it? |
A41019 | how sacred are your lawes? |
A41019 | if so many Popes might be deceived by false suggestions, why not by false arguments, and objections? |
A41019 | if they may be deceived in matter of fact, why not in matter of faith, which often dependeth upon matter of fact? |
A41019 | may be limited by their distinction of a Iudge competent and incompetent? |
A41019 | or the Church, of which himselfe must be a member, to be saved? |
A41019 | or to whom? |
A41019 | shall we be afraid to let a Greyhound goe into the p field, for feare he should be taken by an Hare? |
A41019 | thereby to introduce for their own ends, our now goodly distinctive sign of recusancie? |
A41019 | what horrible prophannesse, what detestable hypocrisie is it? |
A41019 | what thought take they for the parents mulcts and taxes by the state, so long as their Pupils scores are paid in their Colleges? |
A48822 | * for the Sovereignty of Scotland? |
A48822 | Again, who condemn''d your great School- Men, Suarez and Valentia? |
A48822 | And how can a simple Heretick tell, whether it calls you, to Pray, or to eat Fish? |
A48822 | And if it were for his Service, that they would have destroyed Her; pray for whose service was it, that they would have defeated Him? |
A48822 | And why hath not His Holiness dealt so with him that now is? |
A48822 | But did they ever intend their sufferings should go for nothing, or become Ciphers to yours in the day of Reckoning? |
A48822 | But how has this Doctrine taken among the Papists in our Kings Dominions? |
A48822 | But how if that Queen had not been a Catholick? |
A48822 | But if they were observed to the full; should we therefore grant You that Liberty which is against Law? |
A48822 | But in what sense do you call them Desperadoes? |
A48822 | But pray Sir, what think you of it? |
A48822 | But pray Sir, when was it that you govern''d the civiliz''d World? |
A48822 | But pray Sir, who condemned your Cardinals, Bellarmine and Baronius? |
A48822 | But what is this to England? |
A48822 | But what of that? |
A48822 | But what trick had this Jesuite in his head when he fram''d this? |
A48822 | But what was all this to the thrice Noble Queen of Scots? |
A48822 | But when the Treason had miscarried, as hateful as it was,( for who does not hate Treason when it is unsuccessful?) |
A48822 | But where were the Jesuites all the while? |
A48822 | But who could help it? |
A48822 | But why did you not say this for those Conspiracies in Queen Elizabeths daies? |
A48822 | But would you seriously perswade us, that, at six years distance, so many men of heat and youth were still transported with the Joy of that Blessing? |
A48822 | But, supposing this to be true, pray what would you infer from it? |
A48822 | By what Tradition did you receive it? |
A48822 | Can you tell us which of the Conspirators were Cecil''s Instruments to draw in the rest? |
A48822 | Concerning your Principles, where should we look for them, but in your Councils, your Decretals, and the Books of your Divines? |
A48822 | Did not your Pope force King John to do him homage for England? |
A48822 | Did they think your condition was so deplorable, or their own was superfluously fenced and secured against you before the late troubles? |
A48822 | For pray Sir, what did they to be called Protestants? |
A48822 | For what cause then were they enacted? |
A48822 | For who ever said, that All the Papists of that Age were Consenting to the Gun- Powder- Treason? |
A48822 | From that time forward, you that were, always, all, deemed Cavaliers, where were you? |
A48822 | Hath he not often laid claim to the Kingdom of Ireland? |
A48822 | If the old Gentleman in a pet should go to turn out his Tenant, what would our King have left, when these are disposed of? |
A48822 | If you call any thing Religion, that is contrary to these; must we therefore alter our Laws? |
A48822 | In all those weak Efforts* of gasping Loyalty, what did you? |
A48822 | In vain did the poor Royallist strive against it, for what could he do? |
A48822 | Nay, who has condemned our Country- man Parsons, or Cresswel? |
A48822 | Or can you think he was so great an Artist, that he could perswade his Setters to be hang''d, that his Art might not be suspected? |
A48822 | Or had you some new Revelation of the Causes threescore years after the Fact? |
A48822 | Or mean you the Treason which was to have been acted upon that day? |
A48822 | Or who can deny that some Papists in this Age retain the Principles of them that were consenting to it? |
A48822 | Possibly she might have been preferred to have married one of the rwo? |
A48822 | Pray Sir, can you tell who are said to intend this? |
A48822 | Pray Sir, do not Popish- Peers sit in our English Parliaments, as well as Protestants in the French? |
A48822 | Pray Sir, may it not well be said, that Papists can not live without persecuting Protestants? |
A48822 | Pray Sir, what may that be? |
A48822 | Pray Sir, whence had you this tale? |
A48822 | Pray Sir, who Thought it? |
A48822 | Pray what Liberty have the Protestants in Flanders? |
A48822 | That day which is the Festival of our Deliverance? |
A48822 | The like may be said of divers other Countries: Nay in England, while it was Yours, did you give any Liberty at all? |
A48822 | These barbarous people, you say, sequester none for their Faith; but pray what did you, when you govern''d the Civiliz''d World? |
A48822 | These poor men left all again to bring their Monarch to his home: and shall they then be forgotten by you? |
A48822 | These things have been done by Papists broad awake; and what must that be which the wickedst of them never dreamt of? |
A48822 | Was it because they had not all the Liberty they would have had? |
A48822 | Was it ever the less Treason because he drew them into it? |
A48822 | We cry you mercy, if they were no more; but that comes next to be argued, Whether they were Misdemeanors or Treasons? |
A48822 | Were they such in respect of their Discontents? |
A48822 | Were they such in respect of their Fortunes? |
A48822 | What a Coil here was about the Miracle of Father Garnet''s straw? |
A48822 | What a Hardship was this, that the House of Commons would not do that for your sakes, which no House of Commons ever did upon any occasion? |
A48822 | What is it that you abominate and detest? |
A48822 | What then? |
A48822 | Who doubts less of the dangerousness of your Principles and Practices, than they that have Read most, and had most Experience of them? |
A48822 | [ But let it not displease you, Men, Brethren, and Fathers, if we ask whether Ulysses be no better known? |
A48822 | [ Do not you know an Enemy may easily mistake a Mass- Bell for that which calls to Dinner?] |
A48822 | [ Or a Sequestrator be glad to be affronted being Constable? |
A48822 | [ These are they that by beginning with us, murthered their Prince, and wounded you: and shall the same method continue by your Approbation? |
A48822 | [ What have we done that we should now deserve your Anger? |
A48822 | [ Why may we not, noble Country- men, hope for favour from you, as well as French Protestants finde from theirs? |
A48822 | and the People you have kill''d up by whole Families and Townships? |
A48822 | murthered by Fryar Clement? |
A48822 | murthered by Ravilliac? |
A48822 | or Queen Elizabeth had not Been thought Illegitimate? |
A48822 | or did they mistrust( in their dangerous absence) their Subjects at home, because they were of the same profession? |
A48822 | or have you not as free access to our Kings Brother, as they have to theirs? |
A48822 | or ought you to mend your Religion? |
A48822 | or that their blood should be made use of to stop the Execution of those Laws for which they shed it? |
A48822 | or what did we to be judged Popishly Affected? |
A48822 | or when arose that Question? |
A48822 | or whom would it not grieve to have his Loyalty called in Question? |
A48822 | or would a Popish Bastard have been rejected by them? |
A48822 | or would you have his Highness to Catechise, as the Abbot had the Duke of Glocester? |
A48822 | since the Son is King, who is not glad † that he is King? |
A48822 | were they idle for so many years as past between the commencing of his Title, and the Death of Queen Elizabeth? |
A48822 | why then do you not speak out and call it so? |
A48822 | would a legitimate Protestant have been so contended for? |
A86261 | And hide thy head, when ther''s most need of thee? |
A86261 | And many death- door- knocking Souls complain? |
A86261 | And only by damn''d Luthers haeresie, That turn- coat caiti ● s matchles villany? |
A86261 | And thinkst thou, than, I can with patience brook, So rich a prey to be, thus, from me took? |
A86261 | And was not this a craft rak''d out of Hell By divellish furies? |
A86261 | And who so impious, so audacious bold? |
A86261 | And wilt thou( now) a milk- sop dastard be? |
A86261 | Are not these, thē, Roms white- divels? |
A86261 | But these, vile Achabs case far worser stood, For; why? |
A86261 | Can they( said I?) |
A86261 | Can ye for shame, assume the sacred name Of Jesus Christ, and yet his grace disclaim? |
A86261 | Did not the heavenly husband- man declare His sacred minde, touching the wheat and tare? |
A86261 | Do thorns bear grapes? |
A86261 | Do you with blood your followers, thus infect? |
A86261 | Does not our High- Priest curse those Hereticks, And pray for us? |
A86261 | Doth not St. Paul, doth not all Scripture show, No evill ought be done that good may grow? |
A86261 | Doubt we to go- on? |
A86261 | For all''s most true, they teach, which Rome doth say? |
A86261 | For why? |
A86261 | For why? |
A86261 | For why? |
A86261 | For why? |
A86261 | For why? |
A86261 | For why? |
A86261 | For why? |
A86261 | For why? |
A86261 | For, these destroy''d, what were a Realm, but dead? |
A86261 | For, what sayes Christ, the spring of verity, To all his Saints, for all posterity? |
A86261 | For, what though we the King- alone destroy, Leaves he not after him, a Prince t''enjoy His Crown ▪ and Scepter? |
A86261 | Grant, whose foule hopes, Heaven also foolifi''d, To whom, none( yet) had these things certifi''d,( For why? |
A86261 | How could the vault in time, have bin detected, Which all the while was never( once) suspected? |
A86261 | How fair doth it show, With peace and plenties blessed harmony, With every mercies sweet variety? |
A86261 | If, a mean- man to slay be detestable, Then, how much more had this bin execrable? |
A86261 | If, to shed- bloud, be cal''d a crying- sin, How much more monstrous had this murther bin? |
A86261 | In''s wretched hands the Eucharist to hold? |
A86261 | Instead wherof, how doth thy land, still, flow, With milk and honey? |
A86261 | Is this the charity you all professe? |
A86261 | It may be, some condemn thee; what''s the reason? |
A86261 | Lastly, they all consult and take advice, What forrein Prince, they heerto might intice? |
A86261 | Let this, to us, be a sharp goad and spur, Why fear we? |
A86261 | Nay, will you( yet) heare more impiety, Equall( almost) to deepest villany? |
A86261 | Nought, but bare outsides; their best- part, their name? |
A86261 | O English Protestants, why stand you still, As if affraid to curbe Romes cursed will? |
A86261 | O are not these foule broods of vipers vile, And Pluto''s Locusts full of fraud and guile? |
A86261 | O must our bloud be spilt, our King be slain? |
A86261 | O then, dear friends, why stand we to demur? |
A86261 | Or the tall- palme, yeeld pleasant fruite? |
A86261 | Or whither''t were some addle, idle- brain, That this had writ to cause him thence refrain? |
A86261 | Romes faithlesse Synagogue to re- advance, Full stuft with pride, errour and ignorance? |
A86261 | Shall I put- up these heavy losses so, And ope a gate to greater over- throw? |
A86261 | Should he not( then) from due discretion swerve? |
A86261 | So rich a pearle unto such swines to throw? |
A86261 | The Christians, eke, defending valiantly Their town of Rhods,''gainst Pagans, lost the same; Must we the cause( then) by th''event( here) blame? |
A86261 | To whom so doubting Greenwell, thus, began, Why how now( brother Hall) what frights thee man? |
A86261 | Triumphing in the trophies, pitteous spoyl, Of their destroyed Kingdome, native- soyle? |
A86261 | Under their cloathes? |
A86261 | Was it not Mercies majesty and joy, That none of his he brought unto annoy? |
A86261 | Were ever known like blasphemous foule crimes? |
A86261 | What English Lords and Noble- men to save, Who of this Kingdome, should possession have? |
A86261 | What better, greater cause to spend our bloods, Than for Religion to spend life and goods? |
A86261 | What feares within, what foes without, What death, what danger fell Did ever vexus, but it came By Rome and Spain from Hell? |
A86261 | What was the Divell? |
A86261 | What winde hath blown our Catholiks together, I prethee tell me wherfore come they hither? |
A86261 | What? |
A86261 | Who but a Priest of this Society; Wouldst know his name? |
A86261 | Who was so godlesse, who so gracelesse, trow? |
A86261 | Who yeelds due praise to heaven for heavens sweet light? |
A86261 | Why seem ye( yet) to hault twixt two opinions, Pretending truth, fostring these Romish Minions? |
A86261 | Would not his foes within, him, dastard deem? |
A86261 | Wracking their Ships, chaining their Princes great, Swallowing the rest in Seas for fishes meat? |
A86261 | Yea, all, them sots, not souldiers stout esteem? |
A86261 | Yea, are they not the very spawn of Hell, The furies of Avernus fierce and fell? |
A86261 | Yea, canst thou( England) canst thou possibly Be so orewhelmed in stupidity? |
A86261 | Yet since, so daily, man doth it enjoy, Who is''t( almost) that valews it aright? |
A86261 | Yet, otherwise, why should they armour weare? |
A86261 | Your false conceived wrongs( thus) to redresse? |
A86261 | a lyer, homicide; What''s he? |
A86261 | are we not all of us Catholicks? |
A86261 | do figs on thistles grow? |
A86261 | faint we? |
A86261 | is not our cause most right, Religious, just? |
A86261 | what may be the reason Of all this- concourse, at this unfit season? |
A01076 | 10 Whether such supposed succession were afixed to the place, or aplied to the persons? |
A01076 | 11 Whether if the succession were applied to the place, was it not cut off and discontinued when there was no vniuersall Bishop refiant at Rome? |
A01076 | 5 Whether St. Peter ever came at Rome? |
A01076 | 6 Allowing that St. Peter was at Rome, was he not there as an Apostle and so no more appropriate to that place then to the whole world? |
A01076 | 7 Being an Apostle, how came he to be chiefe, yea the vniuersall Pastor over both Iewes and Gentiles? |
A01076 | And will P. R. the Iesuite, and the rest of the English Catholikes of the Romish faction abide by this word in good earnest? |
A01076 | Beyond all this the pondering of such seuerall considerations, to whose brest, or trust are they recommended? |
A01076 | But how doth he convey and conster that part of the oath as concerning the Popes Authority, in dealing with temporall Princes? |
A01076 | But how doth his outward man manage these difficulties? |
A01076 | Christ professed himselfe, and so instructed his Disciples, to bee humble and meeke, but how doth the Pope tread that path? |
A01076 | Dareth he to abide by this? |
A01076 | Doeth not the inferiour members, patiently, and without repugnance, beare all the offences and surcharges, descending vpon them from the head? |
A01076 | Doth he imagine by such his initigation to persuade the King and Realme to tolleration? |
A01076 | God permitteth not the diuell to haue power to destroy the elect and faithfull? |
A01076 | Hath hee not well collected and conected his propositions to bring out this grand conclusion of superiority ouer Princes? |
A01076 | Hath shee left any such Law or libertie, that in any respects the childe may renounce or disclaime his parents? |
A01076 | Hee that hath a power over Hell it selfe, shall not he commaund and over- rule the earth? |
A01076 | Here is goodly building of Castles in the ayre, Castles did I say? |
A01076 | Is not this the very same water of the same Cesterne? |
A01076 | Is there in Nature any so much as desire( much lesse meanes) of remoouing or repressing of the Head? |
A01076 | Is this so great an impietie thinke you? |
A01076 | Marke how they compell our Sauiour Iesus Christ to sallogize against himselfe? |
A01076 | Next vnto the body it selfe, is the issue and off- spring of the bodie, what bounds of dutie hath nature made of the children towards the Father? |
A01076 | Of what he may do, and what he may not doe? |
A01076 | Secondly, God may permit Popes( as Popes) to hold hereticall doctrine, but not to decree it, where shall wee finde consistendi locum? |
A01076 | Shall I coniecture at his conceite in concealing or withdrawing of these words? |
A01076 | Shall I thinke that he hath never read, or vtterly forgotten the Oath of Supremacy? |
A01076 | Then what will they say, or do, to free his Majestie from feares and ielousies? |
A01076 | What moderate meaning hath he found for the safegard of the Catholike consciences that haue taken that oath? |
A01076 | What shall we think he meaneth by proceeding against the Temporall gouernor? |
A01076 | Where shall we find more representatiue obedience of Natures intentions and operations, then in these originals and fountaines of Loue? |
A01076 | Why? |
A01076 | Will you examine another degree of the opperation of Nature? |
A01076 | and so consequently a question, whether the latter diuised Titles be likewise authorized from Christ? |
A01076 | and what is this limitation? |
A01076 | and what 〈 ◊ 〉 they make for Pope Ioane, whose stay standeth vnrefuted? |
A01076 | are they not euery one wholly and absolutely in the Popes discretion? |
A01076 | being declared not as positiue out of the word, but expository, by a sence which the Pope assumeth? |
A01076 | called the subiects of the Catholike Church? |
A01076 | except such his Pastorship were rather Apostolicall then Episcopall? |
A01076 | for feare that his Holinesse be questioned and limited in his owne powre and preeminence? |
A01076 | is it incident and appropriate to his Princely Scepter, to mayntaine the religion now established in his Dominions? |
A01076 | making in the meane time no Religion of the limitting, lessening, and detracting from the Soveraignes Title and pre- eminence? |
A01076 | must not they refuse to sweare vnto that clause of recognition also? |
A01076 | or if hee haue such a Rule ouer Princes themselues, why not also ouer the Subordinate Officers of the Kingdome? |
A01076 | that professeth learning, who well knoweth that wee will presently deny the Popish to be the Catholike Church? |
A01076 | that we haue not departed from the Church? |
A01076 | when hee hath such an argument ab authoritate to a rest him to stand vnto it? |
A01076 | which for some hundreths of yeares after Christ, and since the vsurpation Papall for a long time together hath come to passe? |
A01076 | will Religion allow him more liberty against the highest, then against the meaner Substitutes? |
A01076 | yea, though the father should( as oft as out of iudgement hee doth) cast off or disinherite his sonne? |
A09102 | And are not other Catholicks deliuered from the guylt therof, by the long, and diligent search of Iustice made thereabout? |
A09102 | And are not these goodly definitions( thinke you) for so great and graue a man to produce? |
A09102 | And can any thing be spoken more cleerly for vs, and for our cause, then this? |
A09102 | And did not they cyte many places of Scriptures, to proue the equity& necessity therof? |
A09102 | And do not all Protestants the like at this day, in all places, where they are, both in Polonia, Austria, Hungaria, Bohemia, Styria, and els where? |
A09102 | And do these words last adioyned make any thing at all for our Apologer? |
A09102 | And how can these things be defended with any shew or probability of truth? |
A09102 | And how then are these, and such other places brought in for witnesse, as though they had somwhat to say against vs? |
A09102 | And how then can this Apologer talke so much of equality vsed in all fauours? |
A09102 | And how then is Cardinall Bellarmyne said heere to be no lesse contrary to God, concerning Kings Authority, then light to darknes, and heauen to hell? |
A09102 | And how then, is all this ascribed to the Pope, which proceeded from the Some against his Father? |
A09102 | And how thē is Iordanis conuersus retrorsum, with this Minister? |
A09102 | And how thē shall we cleare this importāt matter, VVhether there be any pointes in this Oath belonging to religion, besydes Cyuill Obedience? |
A09102 | And is this good dealing? |
A09102 | And is this so absurd doctrine? |
A09102 | And may a man thinke this to be true or likely, that so rude a proposition should come from Bellarmine? |
A09102 | And was not this a great in felicity? |
A09102 | And were it not a great synne to increase the same, by casting in oyle to augmēt the flame? |
A09102 | And what an abuse of his Maiesties mercie and clemencie, to expect libertie of Conscience? |
A09102 | And what will the Apologer say heere? |
A09102 | And wherin thē? |
A09102 | And why then are men kept in prison, after they haue taken this Oath? |
A09102 | And why then is this so vniustly layed vpon the Pope? |
A09102 | And why was all this, but for their Religion? |
A09102 | And will not the Catholicks of England vse this speach also vnto their King? |
A09102 | Are they not all gates of Hell? |
A09102 | Are they not executed, that were culpable therof? |
A09102 | Augustine speaking of Iulian, saith thus: Iulian was an vnbelieuing Emperour, was he not an Apostata? |
A09102 | But I would aske him wherin? |
A09102 | But alas, is there no end of exprobration against the Innocent for the Nocent? |
A09102 | But if a man would aske him, how he can proue, that those things were so directly inioyned, and plainly authorized, what answere will he make? |
A09102 | But what is this vnto our Oath? |
A09102 | But what man is so simple, or sil ● y, that will not presently demaund, how we shall know the certaynty, when Antichrist is to come? |
A09102 | But what? |
A09102 | Did S. Ambrose by this acknowledge that the Emperour had higher Authority, then he, in Church- matters? |
A09102 | Doth this man care what he saith? |
A09102 | First this: As for the Catholicke Religion( saith he) can there be one word found in all this Oath, tending to matter of Religion? |
A09102 | For approbation of matters cōcerning faith? |
A09102 | For how shall the Reader try the truth of this obiection? |
A09102 | For that this, perhaps, is called the Oath of Allegiance? |
A09102 | For what more dishonorable infelicity can there be, then that which standeth in Capito Libri of Q. Elizabeths lyfe? |
A09102 | Had it not bene more plaine dealing to haue alleadged some one sentence, or conclusion contradictory to the other? |
A09102 | How can he say, that there was no persecution before the powder- treason? |
A09102 | How can the Apologer defend himself in this place, from willfull exaggeration, and voluntary mistaking? |
A09102 | How is his voyce contrary to the voyce& sense of all the rest? |
A09102 | How is this against him? |
A09102 | How thē doth the Apologer so grosly forget, and contradict himself, euen then, when he goeth about to proue contradictions in his Aduersary? |
A09102 | If it be vnlawfull, why hath he not expressed any one cause or reason therof? |
A09102 | Is not Recusancie a cause of Conscience? |
A09102 | Is not this good dealing? |
A09102 | Is nothing promised in those wordes to be belieued, or not to be belieued? |
A09102 | Is this a token of want of better matter, or no? |
A09102 | Is this good dealing? |
A09102 | May he, in truth, be said to ● rouch, that an Emperor must be cōtēt to drinke after a Bishops Chaplin? |
A09102 | No commiseration? |
A09102 | No compassion? |
A09102 | Nunquid non omnes portae Inferi? |
A09102 | Or doth this iustify the Apologers outragious proposition, That Bellarmyne affirmeth Kings to be rather slaues then Lordes? |
A09102 | Or how doth this shew any such ordinary tricke of falshood in the Cardinal, not in one or two, but in all his citations? |
A09102 | Or may not we deliuer our Iudges of England, from the cryme of murther, though many mens deathes haue proceeded from them, by way of Iustice? |
A09102 | Or rather agree they not fitly to the purpose of the Cardinals exhortation, though for breuityes sake he left them out? |
A09102 | Or why is this submission made? |
A09102 | Shall he be bound to read all Bellarmynes fiue bookes, to see whether it be true or no? |
A09102 | The Sonne of such a Mother, as held her selfe much beholden to English Catholicks? |
A09102 | The second thus: Doth he that taketh it, promise to belieue, or not to belieue any article of Religion? |
A09102 | To take any Oath that the Emperour Charles should propose vnto them? |
A09102 | Were they not all for lyberty of Conscience? |
A09102 | What Author can he bring for it, that auoucheth the same? |
A09102 | What enemy of Christian Religion might not cauill, and calumniate this? |
A09102 | What fault hath Cardinall Bellarmine heere in alledging the words, and iudgement of S. Chrysostome? |
A09102 | What i ● he neuer knew of any such attempt? |
A09102 | What is height of pryde and so ● l ●, i ● this be not? |
A09102 | What was Nero? |
A09102 | What would he haue done, or said, if he had bene pressed with an Oath against his Conscience, or any least poynt of his Religion? |
A09102 | Wherin then, or why are they said to haue submitted themselues? |
A09102 | Wherin then, or why is this submission, or rather remission to the Emperour, and his iudgmēt? |
A09102 | Who knoweth not, that the fayrest tytle is put vpon the fowlest matter, when it is to be persuaded or exacted? |
A09102 | Who seeth not the iniustice of this manner of dealing? |
A09102 | Who seeth not this violēt inforcemēt? |
A09102 | Who would not be ashamed of this intemperate accusation? |
A09102 | Why are M. Blackwell, and M. Charnocke deteyned styll by the L. of Canterbury? |
A09102 | Why are Recusants punished,& fyned for Recusancy, though they take the Oath of Allegiance? |
A09102 | Why had he not obiected in like manner, that they expected the libertie of breathing, and vsing the common ayre, as well as Protestants? |
A09102 | an oppressor, and an Idolatour? |
A09102 | he had reason to complayne of Catholicks sufferance, or no? |
A09102 | quid Dioclesianus? |
A09102 | quid denique iste, quihoc tēpore Ecclesiam persequitur? |
A09102 | so pretended, so printed, so published, so diuulged to the world? |
A09102 | tie, acknowledging him to be their liege Lord and King,& inferiour only to god in his Temporall Gouernment? |
A09102 | what desyre is here descried of calumniation? |
A09102 | what is he who at this tyme, doth persecute the Church? |
A09102 | what was Dioclesian? |
A20647 | 11 The blood of the Martyres was the milke which nourished the Primitiue Church, in her infancy, and shall it be too hard for our digestion now? |
A20647 | 112 Where then shall we hope, that these men will stoppe or limit their blasphemies? |
A20647 | 14 And( to proceede farther in Christs Instruction) are these things said of you for Christs sake? |
A20647 | 15 Is there not a Decretall amongst you, by which it Is made Treason to offend a Cardinall? |
A20647 | 18 Was it not Prodigium Obedientiae, as Sedulius iustly calles it, in Fryar Ruffin to go preach naked? |
A20647 | 22 And what is your recompence? |
A20647 | 22 Why therefore shall not the French, and Italian, and olde English lawes giue occasion of Martyrdome in the same cases, as these new lawes shall? |
A20647 | 27 And is there any Charitie in this Doctrine, or in this act of Refusall? |
A20647 | 30 And was not this your case, before the Breues came? |
A20647 | 32 VVhen any of these reasons inuite them, how small causes are sufficient to awake and call vp this temporall Authoritie? |
A20647 | 37 And haue not you beene proceeded with, in Ordinarie course of Iustice, as Traytors, for Rebellions, and Conspiracies, and Tumults? |
A20647 | 38 Or was the Author thereof no good Catholicke? |
A20647 | 38 What high stiles did many Christian and Orthodoxe Emperours assume to themselues? |
A20647 | 42 And is it not a stange precipitation to vow their helpe to all his errours? |
A20647 | 47 If they doe thus much when they are Serui papae, what will they doe when they are famuli? |
A20647 | 5 And is there any matter of Faith in this Decretall? |
A20647 | 9 With how much curiositie and vnescapablenesse their formes of Abiuration vnder oath are exhibited? |
A20647 | After a dead Dogge, and after a Flea?) |
A20647 | And are you as sure that there are Breues, as that there is a law? |
A20647 | And can you produce Authors of any elder times, then within sixe hundred yeares, to haue concurr''d in this? |
A20647 | And do they which alleadge for the Popes Supremacy ouer Princes, intend the Pope to be Gouernour of all Creatures? |
A20647 | And how farre, may this courage and libertie carie vs, if the Prince command any thing in detriment of our soule? |
A20647 | And how hath he decreed it? |
A20647 | And is there any thing found in either of them, which may be a precedent to this mission? |
A20647 | And of Inhumanity, when he was sorry, if any body loued him? |
A20647 | And of desperate prouocation, when he heard of a plague likely to be in those parts, to make a vow to visit those which were infected? |
A20647 | And of murmuring, when he grudged and grieued, That he could find out no veniall sinne in himselfe? |
A20647 | And were there not some degrees of spirituall pride in Gonzaga, who is praised because he had a paire of patched hose in Delicijs? |
A20647 | And what is this Essentiall truth so euident out of Scripture, which designes the Catholique Church? |
A20647 | And wil they from this argue in Constantine a power, to open and shut hel gates? |
A20647 | And will they endanger al those Catholique authors to this eternall damnation, which haue violated this Donation of Constantine by publique bookes? |
A20647 | Are not many of you d parted ● ro ● your promise in baptisme to our Chu ● ch? |
A20647 | Are you as sure that these Breues, or that any Breues can binde your Conscience in this Case, as you were before, that the law could? |
A20647 | Are you( if you be called Traytors for refusing the Oath) reproued for anie part of his Commandements? |
A20647 | At least why should Campian, and those which were executed before these new statutes, be any better Martyres then they? |
A20647 | Because( saies he) if it were affoorded Christ ● belongs it not to his Church, which is bone of his bone? |
A20647 | But how shall wee beleeue that these miracles are from God, or that he doth them in testimony of that mans sanctity? |
A20647 | But to whom shall these men be subiect in the meane time? |
A20647 | But what? |
A20647 | By what way then, and at what time came this Authoritie into them, if it were once out? |
A20647 | Christ appointed twelue, whom hee might send to Preach; but what? |
A20647 | Did the Popes in their Bulls, intimate any illegitimation, or vsurpation, or touch vpon any such statute? |
A20647 | Doth he gouerne Sea, and Elements? |
A20647 | For since the Pope is the Church, how can you diuide the Church from the Court? |
A20647 | Hee Preached Christ; And what did hee Preach of him? |
A20647 | How lame then and vnperfect is this spirituall principality, which can affoord but one halfe? |
A20647 | How man ● Kings are Saints? |
A20647 | Is it for any of these, that you say, A Clergy man can not be a traytor, though he rebell ● because he is no subiect? |
A20647 | Is it for hauing established a Primacy vpon that Bishoppe, aboue his fellow Patriarches, which was so long litigious? |
A20647 | Is not ciuill obedience either really or by intention and implication sworne by euery subiect to the King in his birth, and after? |
A20647 | Is there any charitie to the Church, or partie, or faction, which you haue in this Kingdom? |
A20647 | Is there any to your self? |
A20647 | It was the seede of the Church, out of which we sprung; and shall wee grudge to Tithe our selues to God, in any proportion that hee will accept? |
A20647 | Not but that they confesse, that there are also some other wayes besides martyrdome to escape Purgatorie; else how got Lypsius so soone to heauen? |
A20647 | O what spirituall Calenture possesses you, to make this hard shift to destroy your selues? |
A20647 | Or any part thereof? |
A20647 | Or d ● d they goe about to aduance the right Heire in the Spanish ● nuasion? |
A20647 | Or for enriching him with a Patrimony, and Priuiledges almost equall to their owne? |
A20647 | Or for withdrawing him from the iawes of the Barbarous deuourers of Italy? |
A20647 | Or must they stay, to aske and obtaine leaue of their Clergie, to depose such a transgressor? |
A20647 | Or that he ouer whom the Emperour had supreame temporall authority, should haue authority ouer the Emperour in temporall causes? |
A20647 | So that of this place, that Archbishop of whom I spoke before, exclaimes, who can endure this? |
A20647 | Thus farre Feuardentius charges vs. 36 And is it not your case also, to for ● ait your Martyrdome vpon the same circumstances? |
A20647 | To such a one as will be content to resigne, when so euer the other will aske forgiuenesse? |
A20647 | To what King haue Churches or Altars beene erected? |
A20647 | Wee therefore repute OTHO Emperour; For, if the Electors would neuer agree, should the Apostolicke Sea alwayes be without a defender? |
A20647 | What King hath done any miracles? |
A20647 | What infallible assurance could they haue of this, to excuse them of disobedience in going, or indiscretion in swearing? |
A20647 | Who would wish S. Henrie the Dane any health, that had seene him, When wormes crawled out of a corrupted Vlcer in his Knee, put them in againe? |
A20647 | and haue these two Breues made your case to differ so much from his, that that which was lawfull to him, may not be so to you? |
A20647 | and may not the Pope as well Canonize the whole Spanish Fleete, which perished in 88. for your Catholique faith, and Ecclesiastique immunitie? |
A20647 | and that he refused to put on a paire of old bootes, because a worshipfull man had worne them? |
A20647 | and that when his handes did cleaue with colde, he would put on no gloues? |
A20647 | how durst hee say, that this kissing of the popes feete, was established in saint Luke, when the sinner kissed Christs feete? |
A20647 | or did those which vndertooke for you, euer intend this forsaking? |
A20647 | or doe they thinke that the will and commandements of God are deriued to vs onely by the way of the Pope? |
A20647 | or hath the blood of any men executed by those lawes, died your Martyrologes with any Rubriques? |
A20647 | or this, That it is better to sinne against God, then our spirituall Father, because he can reconcile vs to God, but no body to him? |
A20647 | or was the way of the right Heire Catholiquely prepared by Dolemans booke? |
A20647 | wil you so, in obeying him, disobey him,& swallow his conclusions,& yet accuse his fashiō of prouing them? |
A31234 | About Q. Maries Persecution, and whether she or the Reformed Government, spilt most Blood for Religion? |
A31234 | And for Rebellion and Tumults, they have been eminent in Poland, Boheme, Hungary, France, Germany? |
A31234 | And how can a simple Heretick tell, whether it call you to pray, or to eat Fish? |
A31234 | And lastly, could any Publican Lollard, Wickliffian, or new Sect stir, but the whole Kingdom presently detested them? |
A31234 | And now he asks, What our Country men did or suffered for it? |
A31234 | And who can be guiltless, if assertions without any shadow of proof shall be received against him? |
A31234 | As some wicked mē dealt ill with Gods Anointed; so on the other side, who defended these Princes against pretended illegal impositions of Rome? |
A31234 | Besides, have not many Catholiques also suffered for believing the Pope to be Head of the Church? |
A31234 | But besides, how extravagant is that beginning? |
A31234 | But how impudent is the Minister, to say, we were never in trouble, as he knows, for this? |
A31234 | But let it not displease you( Men Brethren, and Fathers) if we ask whether Ulisses be no better known? |
A31234 | But let it not displease( Men, Brethren, and Fathers) if we ask whether Ulysses be no better known? |
A31234 | But now my Minister will nimbly demand, Is not this accusing the King, and blaming the whole Parliament for their Advice and Counsel? |
A31234 | But suppose he was as eminent and faithful as Bedin field, Jerningham,& c. Must that excuse a man from being fairly tried for Treason? |
A31234 | But the Minister says, What is all this to England, where Prince and people are Protestants? |
A31234 | But the Minister urges, if the Papists thought Queen Elizabeth an Usurper, why did not they stir sooner? |
A31234 | But what do you drive at by Throgmortons usage? |
A31234 | But what made this mad man ask where we were in all those weak efforts of gaspink Loyalty? |
A31234 | But what was this to the Q. of Scots? |
A31234 | But why do I go to the particulars of this notorious Rebellion? |
A31234 | But why does this poor Minister continually harp upon James Clement, whom the Divel had seduced for this work? |
A31234 | But would not a man now think this Minister had abused us sufficiently? |
A31234 | But, pray, what is the Frenchman to us, had he been Papist? |
A31234 | But, suppose Jesuites were Villains; what is that to the Catholick Faith? |
A31234 | By this Argument then, if the Parliament should make it Treason( as who knows but they may?) |
A31234 | Can Thuanus, or any man else, look upon that action with more horrour then I? |
A31234 | Can any thing touch men of Honour more, then after the loss of so many Lives and Estates, insultingly to have it said, It was but your Duty? |
A31234 | Can we chuse but be dismay''d( when all things fail) that extravagant Crimes are fathered on us? |
A31234 | Can we chuse but be dismay''d( when all things fail) that extravagant Crimes are fathered on us? |
A31234 | Could there be a more frightful sight, then to see the whole English World on a sudden, point and cry, Fie on them, Fie on them? |
A31234 | Did I ever say otherwise, then that the Protestants were to be honoured for their wonderful service to the King? |
A31234 | Did Queen Mary ask his consent? |
A31234 | Did any Pope send in this manner to Edward the Sixth? |
A31234 | Do not you know an Enemy may easily mistake a Mass- Bell, for that which calls to Dinner; or a Sequestrator glad to be affronted being Constable? |
A31234 | Do not you know an Enemy may easily mistake a Mass- Bell, for that which calls to Dinner? |
A31234 | Does he find any such record in our Histories? |
A31234 | Doubtless he means some Hugonot Minister: for what Cavalier was ever in France, and knows not how those Saints adored Cromwel? |
A31234 | Had not we three times more Estates sold then any people else? |
A31234 | Had our Priests any power in England? |
A31234 | Has the Indiscretion of some few incenst you? |
A31234 | Has the Indiscretion of some few incenst you? |
A31234 | Have we not been all of the same Party, or can there he named a Papist that was not for the King, even in te worst of times? |
A31234 | Have we not seen that( for the safety of Religion) Edward the Sixth gave away by the advice of his Councel the Kingdom to Jane Gray? |
A31234 | Have we not seen, Good Reader, that such ridiculous Stories as these have lately ruined the Kingdom? |
A31234 | He farther says, what could the Parliament do less, then invite the People to bring in their grievances to the place of Redress? |
A31234 | Here he asks what may that be? |
A31234 | Here he asks, Who thought so? |
A31234 | How childishly rediculous is this Ministers Allegation, That none of us suffered but by known Laws? |
A31234 | How commonly is it said, That the Oath of renouncing their Religion is intended for these? |
A31234 | How commonly is it said, That the Oath of renouncing their Religion is intended for these? |
A31234 | How did Tenants begin to confront their Landlords? |
A31234 | How often have we seen it in the narrow places of London? |
A31234 | I would fain know, if the Clergy and Religious were since ever more in power then in those days? |
A31234 | If it be lawful, why might not Papists put to death men( who they thought deserved it) as well as Protestants? |
A31234 | If remedies were needful, what Medicament could be better applied then the gentle balm of true perswasion? |
A31234 | If then a woe be pronounc''d against such, what will become of them that asperse his Members? |
A31234 | In the next place, let me know whether a man may be executed for this Tenets in Religion, or no? |
A31234 | In this sort who have ever suffered more then we? |
A31234 | Is it to excuse the two unheard of 〈 ◊ 〉 that he tell; me of four or five Kings since the Conquest made away by Papists? |
A31234 | Is not this pretty, that no body died in England for Religion, but for Treason? |
A31234 | Is this a blemish to the Cavaliers in general? |
A31234 | Is this proportionable, Good Reader? |
A31234 | It may be they were not sorry in their hearts: For what men are so at the death of their Enemies? |
A31234 | Might not then a man modestly say, that Popery governed the civilized World, when it governed the whole World? |
A31234 | Now who is it( having read less then the first six Books of Euclid) but can demonstrate that this is not altogether exact? |
A31234 | Now, I beseech you, Reader( having read the Apology through) what injury has any good man done him by it? |
A31234 | Now, Reader, let me ask you when will the business of our times be ripe for History? |
A31234 | Of the Papist''s that leave their Religion,& why? |
A31234 | Or a Sequestrator be glad to be affronted being Constable? |
A31234 | Or did they mistrust( in their dangerous absence) their Subjects at home, because they were of this Profession? |
A31234 | Or lastly, which of all our Kings used to entreat his favour to be Crowned? |
A31234 | Or shall my Lord Douglas and his brave Scots be left to their shifts, who scorn''d to receive Wages of those that have declared War against England? |
A31234 | Or who is it, that says the Swedes ar inhumane, because none except L ● therans shall live among them? |
A31234 | Or who knows not of the Appeals from Africk, when matters of moment arose, even in the most acknowledged Primitive times? |
A31234 | Or who told us when Cromwel lived, Be gone, you are no friends to Caesar? |
A31234 | Or why did K. James put to death b Legat and Wightman, but because he religiously thought it was unfit they should longer live to blaspheme? |
A31234 | Or, shall my Lord Douglas and his brave Scots be left to their shifts; who scorn''d to receive Wages of those that have declared War against England? |
A31234 | Or, when the Question arose? |
A31234 | Pray what advantage has this Minister got by loading us with crimes, of which we are innocent? |
A31234 | Pray, Master Parson, let me ask you, Whether Laws in all places are executed by inferiour Officers, according to the intent of the Legislator? |
A31234 | Pray, Reader, to speak moderately, is not this man the archest wrangler that ever was? |
A31234 | Pray, Reader, what is in this Answer that confutes the Apology? |
A31234 | Shall Notions then convince Experience, when as Demonstration it self often gives way to Practice? |
A31234 | Suppose, Reader, this were true, that a design was recommended to the prayers of the Catholicks, what were they guilty of by it? |
A31234 | Tell me then, where is the Temporal advantage of Reformation? |
A31234 | The proposal by the Minister is this: Whether if the Queen of Scots had been a Protestant, we should have stickled for her? |
A31234 | Then he asks us, where we were from that time forward, in all those weak efforts of a gasping Loyalty? |
A31234 | Then he asks when it was that we governed the civilized World? |
A31234 | These are they that by beginning with us, Murthered their Prince, and wounded you: And shall the same method continue by your approbation? |
A31234 | These are they, that by beginning with us, murthered their Prince, and wounded you: And shall the same Method continue by your approbation? |
A31234 | These poor men left all again to bring their Monarch to his home, and shall they then be forgotten by You? |
A31234 | These poor men left all again to bring their Monarch to his home, and shall they then he forgotten by You? |
A31234 | Was ever man so impudent as to deny this? |
A31234 | Was it not strange in the beginning, to behold c Abbies destroyed, Bishopricks gelded, Chanteries, Hospitals and Colledges turned to profane uses? |
A31234 | Was not Godliness, Godliness, the cry of all the Saints? |
A31234 | Was not the Apology directed to them? |
A31234 | Were not Priests of all Orders hanged? |
A31234 | Were not we where the rest of the Royal party were? |
A31234 | Were they not forced to skulk always in holes, and hanged as often as taken? |
A31234 | What Preacher preacht this in the days of old? |
A31234 | What a Volume might there be here writ, if every matter mentioned were to be fully discust? |
A31234 | What advātage will Persecutiō bring, but to make us glory that we suffer for Christ? |
A31234 | What could now destroy our hopes with this gratious Prince, but a seming Plot against his Life and Line? |
A31234 | What does he mean? |
A31234 | What does the Minister mean by Protestants known, and no liberty given? |
A31234 | What have we done, that we should now deserve your Anger? |
A31234 | What have we done, that we should now deserve your Anger? |
A31234 | What is the meaning of this distinction, That many of my Church were not of my Party? |
A31234 | What is this to our Religion, more then if the King of Spain should make use ▪ of the Politicks too far? |
A31234 | What is''t then, I beseech you( were the fact proved against me) I have committed, that Protestant Authors have not done and worse? |
A31234 | What reason has the Minister to say I could ▪ name no other Country But France, where Protestants have open Churches? |
A31234 | What scoffing Blasphemies did the Seditious utter? |
A31234 | What shall I say then to such a man, who will yet affirm our Principles inconsistent with Obedience? |
A31234 | What thoughts can men have when they find not themselves opprest, but the publick interest of their Country? |
A31234 | Whether Papists die in England for their Conscience or for Treason? |
A31234 | Whether Papists twice converted England from Paganism? |
A31234 | Whether Popish or Protestant Governments are kinder to their dissenting Subjects? |
A31234 | Whether Protestant Princes are more absolute then the Popish? |
A31234 | Whether their General Councils, Decretals and Divines teach Papists Rebellion and deposing Kings? |
A31234 | Whither Papist''s caus''d the war in the three Kingdomes? |
A31234 | Whither Papist''s govern''d the civiliz''d world? |
A31234 | Who is ignorant that that Great man our General( whose memory all ages shall for ever honor) concealed at first what he had long determined? |
A31234 | Who is it, Reader, that having read History is ignorant of the great power the Bishop of Rome had over the East, as the Greek Fathers tell us? |
A31234 | Who is it, that morally blames the Moors of Affrick( being of one Profession) for keeping out even the Gospel it self? |
A31234 | Who then will ever believe a word more he says, when he is so strangely impudent to no purpose? |
A31234 | Who therefore, My Lords and Gentlemen, will be so little pitied as you, if you should be twice deceived after the same method and māner? |
A31234 | Who would now think that a man could be so abominable as to lay such a thing to our charge without any proof at all? |
A31234 | Why do not the Kings of France, Spain, Portugal and Poland see this? |
A31234 | Why does this Gentleman say, we never knew the Laws executed? |
A31234 | Why may not we, Noble Country- men, hope for favour from you, as well as the French Protestants find from theirs? |
A31234 | Why may not we, Noble Country- men, hope for favour from you, as well as the French Protestants find from theirs? |
A31234 | Will you never leave perverting History, or at best betraying your own ignorance? |
A31234 | Would not this Logick then make the whole Church of England guilty of Phanatick Principles, because Dr. Taylor writ for liberty of Prophesie? |
A31234 | Your misdemeanors? |
A31234 | ],[ London? |
A31234 | and can any man believe if they once come in fashion again, they will end with Papists? |
A31234 | and have I not always declared, that his Majesty ows as much to them, as ever Prince can owe to Subjects? |
A31234 | and if Queen Elizabeth had not been thought illegitimate, whether nevertheless we had not rebelled against her? |
A31234 | and were not the Laws put in force, so that to those that had something, two parts of it were also swept away? |
A31234 | and who of us in his Majesties absence had not estimation among the rest of the Cavaliers, according to his ranck and quality? |
A31234 | condemn so many Hereticks in their time? |
A31234 | for if he dares disown a thing which all men know, how will he then cavil, do you think, at what is known but only to the Wise? |
A31234 | for what man of our Party did not faithfully serve the King to his power? |
A31234 | has he forgot Poland, even Crakaw it self, where theire Orthodox Socinian Cathechism was made? |
A31234 | how often in the Paper- houses of Charing Cross, the Strand? |
A31234 | how often in the ill- building of Kings- street? |
A31234 | must Cambridge be Babylon, and the English Religion false, because the Mēbers of one Colledge( suppose Emanuel) were thought knaves and hypocrites? |
A31234 | or did they mistrust( in their dangerous absence) their Subjects at home because they were of this Profession? |
A31234 | or who is it that contemns not a Frenchman whilst he is an Enemy to England? |
A31234 | the Royal Party? |
A31234 | was ever any thing so evident, as that the Rebels deemed all Papists Cavaliers, and all Cavaliers Papists? |
A31234 | was there any Party in England more deprest then we? |
A31234 | was there ever more of Pilgrimages and all sorts of Devotion, which Protestants call Superstitious? |
A31234 | were not Schoolmen then most in their splendor? |
A31234 | were not others imprisoned during life? |
A31234 | were they not Papists? |
A07817 | ( excepting the examples of Knox, Buchanan, Goodman, Munster, which all I iustly condemned) which was not directlie confuted? |
A07817 | 107 But why should it be thought a matter incredible that such a dismall, and as it were disastrous end should befall a Pope? |
A07817 | 111 I haue alleged the latter, P. R. hath opposed the former; both of vs haue affirmed a truth: where then is the falshood? |
A07817 | 21 What haue I sayd, which I haue not prooued? |
A07817 | 24 Venture my credit, Sir? |
A07817 | 33 Say you so P. R.? |
A07817 | 45 SAy( P. R.) what is your mentall Equiuocation? |
A07817 | 53 And where is now P. R. his boast of Scriptures, Fathers, Reasons? |
A07817 | 84 In my book of m Satisfaction I had this passage, concerning an obiection against some Protestants, answering, Deny Christs to be God? |
A07817 | 85 A seuenth, in changing an interrogation[ Haue you any thing to say to their practise?] |
A07817 | A second obiection of falshood, whereupon hee insulteth thus: This false Lad setteth downe his owne fiction: and is not this perfidious dealing? |
A07817 | A tenth obiection of falshood, with this insultation: Is not this rather falshood than folly? |
A07817 | Am I your enemy because I tell you the truth? |
A07817 | An eleuenth obiection of falshood, with this insultation: How can this malicious cauilling Minister expect to bee trusted heereafter? |
A07817 | And are these contrary? |
A07817 | And are these contrary? |
A07817 | And can P. R. suspect any hypocrisie in the letter d? |
A07817 | And can now P. R. call a Confutation a Confession without a grosse abuse of the confidence of his Reader, and his own conscience? |
A07817 | And can one truth shoulder out another? |
A07817 | And can there be a greater contradiction than this? |
A07817 | And could any say thus but a lier? |
A07817 | And could our Mitigator shew himselfe a more egregious Preuaricator than thus? |
A07817 | And could this deserue so rigorous a censure of impudent impietie, and whatsoeuer bitternesse the gall of this man could vent out? |
A07817 | And doe you see this follie? |
A07817 | And is it so Sir Thomas? |
A07817 | And is not this a passing treacherie, trow wee? |
A07817 | And is not this good policie? |
A07817 | And is not this notable dissimulation in a matter so cleere and euident? |
A07817 | And is not this perfidious dealing? |
A07817 | And is there heere any word peculiar of a Protestant Prince, or of his successour? |
A07817 | And must it therefore be rather translated, shed? |
A07817 | And shall not Protestants( except they will acknowledge themselues to haue deserued a new Massacre) call this your doctrine execrable and rebellious? |
A07817 | And then how could these words be reprehensible in M. R. which are warrantable by S. Peter? |
A07817 | And was not this a piece of fine fraud? |
A07817 | And what can be more 〈 ◊ 〉 vrged than this? |
A07817 | And what els? |
A07817 | And what then? |
A07817 | And where now is the assurance of his vpright conscience protested to his Maiestie in his Epistle Dedicatorie? |
A07817 | And why may not this example fit? |
A07817 | And why not? |
A07817 | And will euer any man credit T. M. any more in any thing that he alledgeth, when this consciencelesse falsification is once discouered in him? |
A07817 | And will you stand to it& lose your credit, if this be falsly and calumniously alleged? |
A07817 | Are not these Rogationists and you Romanists equally bent to like mischiefe? |
A07817 | Are they not both true? |
A07817 | But I pray you P. R. can Apostata Princes be excepted, where All Princes and Emperonrs are included? |
A07817 | But I pray you Sir, what is there in Historiographers of after times but only case of report? |
A07817 | But I( alas) what shall I say? |
A07817 | But can you finde no more Protestants of this opinion,( to wit, besides M. Willet, and D. Fulke?) |
A07817 | But how will P. R. now vse mee vpon this aduantage? |
A07817 | But some will say, in so manifestly impudence how can any argument of modestie appeare? |
A07817 | But what if one of the souldiers had replied to him thus? |
A07817 | But what now will follow of all this? |
A07817 | But who may attempt the execution heereof? |
A07817 | But why had he not adioined also, that if he were carelesse of his flocke, then Gregory must bee his name, which importeth a vigilant Pastor? |
A07817 | But why is this impudency? |
A07817 | But will you know the best way to prooue your Aduersarie T. M. slanderous? |
A07817 | Can any thing bee more fraudulently alleged? |
A07817 | Can there be a more grieuous accusation than this? |
A07817 | Can there be any falshood in the particle Of? |
A07817 | Can this be done but of purpose, and consequently by a guiltie conscience? |
A07817 | Can this be ignorance? |
A07817 | Can this his taxation of falshood be thought true? |
A07817 | Can you extract such a generall consequent out of the confession of the Minister? |
A07817 | Common sense( sayth hee) might haue replied( to the souldiers) What could you tell what was done when you were asleepe? |
A07817 | Could any by- stander containe laughter, to heare such a senslesse exception as this? |
A07817 | Could that errour be by errour of Print, diuersitie of translation, or difference of Editions? |
A07817 | Did he euer acknowledge your mentall Aequiuocation so vniuersall, as you make it, of all Vniuersities, Schooles, Diuines, Casuists? |
A07817 | Did your fellow answer Learnedly? |
A07817 | Doth the man( who maketh mention of his* Interruption by sicknesse) know what he hath now sayd? |
A07817 | Editions? |
A07817 | For I am accused to haue vsed that interrogation[ Haue you any thing to say vnto their practise?] |
A07817 | Furthermore bee alwaies echoing out against him some opprobrious termes, as Mountbanck, Grashopper, Malitious, shamelesse, false, and what not? |
A07817 | Had we not now reason to expect as absolute a Syllogisme as all his wit, art, and industrie could inuent? |
A07817 | Hath he any shadow of excuse by ignorance of the Authour and place? |
A07817 | How then can my assertion be thought slanderous, which necessary consequence of reason prooueth to bee too true? |
A07817 | How then could our Mitigator affirme, That mentall aequiuocation is defended of Casuists and Doctors, and contradicted by none? |
A07817 | I concluded thus; Wee haue heard of their opinions, haue you any thing to except against their practise? |
A07817 | In effect confessed all that was opposed? |
A07817 | Is it because Otto Frisingensis is cited contrarie to his meaning? |
A07817 | Is it possible that my Aduersary can free himselfe from a falsitie corroding the conscience? |
A07817 | Is it the Minor? |
A07817 | Is not this singular falshood? |
A07817 | Is not your Defence( P. R.) Miluus& Columbus, A Kitish Doue? |
A07817 | Is the Citie safe? |
A07817 | Is the Interiection But in this repetition like a theefe by the way to seduce and robbe, and is not rather as a true man to direct thee? |
A07817 | Is this a Catholike Mitigation? |
A07817 | Is this it? |
A07817 | Is this the assurance of his vpright conscience, whereof he braggeth so much? |
A07817 | Is this to confesse a generallitie? |
A07817 | It is not altogether impertinent? |
A07817 | It is not impossible, good: For why? |
A07817 | Morton now to say to this against vs? |
A07817 | Morton to make? |
A07817 | Mortons out of Lambertus against Pope Hildebrand, who is by them so highly commended, as you haue heard, and his aduersaries condemned? |
A07817 | Must it be euen so then P. R? |
A07817 | Nay did I not expresly say, that I would pay thee foure Nobles? |
A07817 | Nay did not he k confute this your assertion of generalitie by the expresse sentence of your owne Doctour Genesius Sepulueda? |
A07817 | Nay rather doth he not seeke to iniurie me with falshood? |
A07817 | Now if there bee a fault in a peece of cloth, must we necessarily iudge that the spinner was to blame? |
A07817 | Now then what a notable Critick haue I met withall, whom euery goodwife is able to conuince of idle dottage? |
A07817 | Of which kind P. R. will prooue himselfe to be; for what excuse may he now vse to free himselfe from falshood? |
A07817 | Or is not this an Assertion fit for one of those Doctours, whereof S. Paul talketh, that vnderstand not what they say, nor whereof they affirme? |
A07817 | Or will you say that Answer was vntrue? |
A07817 | Or will you thinke it rather follie than falshood, that could not discerne betweene verò and verè? |
A07817 | Or, could it be called then vniuersall, when but one man set it first abroch? |
A07817 | Otherwise, I must expostulate with them according to the Apostles example:* Am I your enemie, because I tell you the truth? |
A07817 | Otherwise, answer your Aduersaries sincerely vnto this their Interrogatorie; Did you euer spare vs, being sufficiently able to hurt vs? |
A07817 | Prints? |
A07817 | SAint Cyprian saith, 1 Whence is this tradition? |
A07817 | Say then( good P. R.) seeing both these two are true, can one of them be a lie? |
A07817 | Say therfore: was that answer of your fellow true, wherin it is said, that diuers Catholikes do not allow of this doctrine of aequiuocation? |
A07817 | Shall excuse him by diuersitie of Editions? |
A07817 | Shall hee feare any ambush in this clause? |
A07817 | Shall that by- stander be therefore thought euer after vnworthie of all credit? |
A07817 | Shall we know the cause? |
A07817 | Si latrones, si bestiae, cùm irruu ● t, omni iure expugnantur, cur non tyrānus quouis latrone& bestiâ deterior? |
A07817 | Such( alas) is the case of all them& c.] Doe you see how substantially he hath prooued this matter? |
A07817 | The second deceit is wilfull leauing out of the first words of the Authour, Sed quid dices si iuraui? |
A07817 | The woman is asked( saith T. M.) sold you the land for so much? |
A07817 | Then the Iustice of Peace replieth, How know you that P. R. did it, you being then asleepe? |
A07817 | There is but one, that is, there is no other Edition in the world? |
A07817 | Translations? |
A07817 | Vnde est haec traditio? |
A07817 | Vnder what visard then could he call a perfect manifestation of this obiection a dissimulation? |
A07817 | Was it negligence or ignorance? |
A07817 | Was it then the Synod of Constantinople, that was condemned in the Councell of Francford, and not the second Synode of Nice? |
A07817 | What excuse can he pretend? |
A07817 | What excuse may be admitted in this place? |
A07817 | What excuse now shall P. R. make? |
A07817 | What is the difference? |
A07817 | What is there in all this Syllogisme which Doleman alias Parsons, can denie to be his Assertion? |
A07817 | What may the Hearer beleeue of all he sayth, when euery where he is found intangled with such foolish treachery? |
A07817 | What now? |
A07817 | What reioynder would our Minister make? |
A07817 | What shall we then thinke of P. R. but as of the man, who had purposed with himselfe either to scorne Protestants, or else to betray his Catholikes? |
A07817 | What therefore? |
A07817 | What will now P. R. doe, after that this his montanous boast of A true Syllogisme hath brought foorth this ridiculous mouse? |
A07817 | Where is his naked innocencie? |
A07817 | Where is his naked innocencie? |
A07817 | Where is his simplicitie in Christ Iesus? |
A07817 | Where is his simplicitie in Christ Iesus? |
A07817 | Where is his vpright conscience? |
A07817 | Where is that which was called the Common answer? |
A07817 | Where then is the sinceritie of this mans conscience? |
A07817 | Wherein now haue I wronged my conscience? |
A07817 | Who can beleeue this Minister heereafter? |
A07817 | Who would not thinke but that the man were very skilfull in that Art, wherein he presumeth to giue such a censure? |
A07817 | Why so? |
A07817 | Why who are you, and where is your abode, tell me? |
A07817 | Will euer any man credit T. M. heereafter? |
A07817 | Will he not be ashamed to see himselfe conuinced of so great and shamelesse ouerlashing? |
A07817 | Will he say, that it was an error of ignorance, ouersight, negligence? |
A07817 | Will he thinke the accusation is false, because of the addition of But? |
A07817 | Will hee then denie the Ergo or Conclusion? |
A07817 | Will now our P. R. call Surius, Furius,( who hath published the bodie of Councels) and annihilate all his credit heereafter? |
A07817 | Will you cite Protestants for confessing such Doctrines as ancient, which they condemne to haue beene superstitious? |
A07817 | Would P. R. if he heard this, pronounce this fellow vnguiltie? |
A07817 | Would not by- standers either laugh at him, as at a lunatike, or else suspect him for a cosening cheater? |
A07817 | [ Common sense( sayth Thomas Morton) might haue replied, How could you tell what was done when you were asleepe? |
A07817 | an ex dominica autoritate descendens, an de Apostolorum mandatis& epistolis? |
A07817 | by Fathers? |
A07817 | can any excuse him from falshood and malice in so open treachery? |
A07817 | did he not commend B. for valour and bountie? |
A07817 | doth it not speake also indifferently of all sorts of religion, of what side soeuer the truth be? |
A07817 | if they did, then where was the faith of Bellarmine and Baronius, who say it did not erre in question of faith? |
A07817 | ignorance, negligence? |
A07817 | ignorance, ouersight, negligence? |
A07817 | is it deriued from the Lords authority, or from the precept of the Apostles? |
A07817 | is my shield sound? |
A07817 | is this the assurance of his vpright conscience whereof hee braggeth to his Maiesty? |
A07817 | it was condemned? |
A07817 | may he not say heereafter, I was ashamed, and therefore I hid my selfe? |
A07817 | nay doth not the Text speake plainely of making a King, where none is? |
A07817 | nay, where is this man P. R. himselfe, the new select Aduocate for this cause? |
A07817 | numquid clypeus meus integer? |
A07817 | or a full answer vnto euery obiected exception a concealement, as though nothing had beene reprehended? |
A07817 | or a particular repetition and satisfaction to all, an hypocriticall dealing, as though there had beene nothing obiected at all? |
A07817 | or by his owne Doctors? |
A07817 | or by sensible reasons? |
A07817 | or can any man excuse him from falshood and malice in this open treacherie? |
A07817 | or how may any thinke, that he writeth from his conscience, seeing him vse such grosse shifts and falshoods in so important a matter? |
A07817 | s But I say it is a truth, because the speech agreeth with the mind of the speaker,& c. How now would my Reader heare this noble Equiuocator confuted? |
A07817 | sayd the Herald so? |
A07817 | shall it be edition, print, translation? |
A07817 | then is he no Mitigator: would he iustifie his accuser? |
A07817 | what amends will P. R. make? |
A07817 | what will P. R. obiect? |
A07817 | where is his appeale vnto both our Vniuersities? |
A07817 | where is his challenge of Canonists and Schoole- diuines? |
A07817 | where is his naked innocency? |
A07817 | where is his simplicity in Christ Iesus? |
A07817 | where is his vpright conscience? |
A07817 | whether he spoke this being in his feauer- fit, or in temper? |
A07817 | whether in a dreame, or awake? |
A07817 | whether in his right minde, or in distraction? |
A07817 | who shall plead my cause? |
A07817 | who? |
A07807 | & Bernardus ad Episcopum Senonensem idem colligit,[ Omnis anima] tum vestra, inquit, quis vos excipit? |
A07807 | & c. And can any man of conscience deny the conclusion? |
A07807 | & qui non Graeci? |
A07807 | * Propheta, cùm art,[ Vt euellas,& c.] Quid horum fastum sonat? |
A07807 | * Vt iugulent homines surgunt de nocte Latrones: vt teipsum serues non expergisceris? |
A07807 | 2. h Potuitnè Thomas apertius damnare istorum sententiam, qui docent fas esse Reo crimen verum sibi intentum arte verborum inficiari? |
A07807 | 216. f Vultis in Regno Galliae Christianissimo Regem proclamare Nauarraeū Caluinistam? |
A07807 | 28. i Quis te docuit tàm bellè nugari? |
A07807 | 3. m Apostolis interdicitur dominatus; ergo aut tu vsurpare audi aut dominans Apostolatum, aut Apostolus dominatum? |
A07807 | 34. b An nos frangimusianuam, cum effractoribas suribus, quia, si non cā clauderemus, illi non frangerant? |
A07807 | 4. d In quos vestiûm populum, exaest ● antem contra vos, insurgere sollicitauimus? |
A07807 | 466. g Illi nè clament Viue Rex, quē ne salutare possint, nec in domum suam recipere? |
A07807 | 6. d Dicit aliquis, ergonè Rahab melius fecisset, si nullam misericordiam hospitibus prestitisset nolēdo mentiri? |
A07807 | 6. orbem terrarum partitus, insulasque noui orbis Arragonum Regi einsque haeredibus donauit, vt ex eius diplomate patet? |
A07807 | 9. a Ecce graui morbo periclitatur aegrotus; cuius vires ferre non possunt, si ei mors vnici& charissimi filij sui nunciaretur: quid respondebis? |
A07807 | A matter notorious: and how( I pray you) may we better, then by the doctrine of your Generals, know what is your generall doctrine? |
A07807 | Acts( I say) de futuris of things to come, as namely, of fidelitie, loyaltie, sanctitie hereafter to be performed? |
A07807 | After this came in his wife, ignorant of that which was done; and Peter sayd vnto her, Tell me, Sold you the land for so much? |
A07807 | Againe, who was it that would haue killed the now p King of Fraunce with a knife? |
A07807 | All this is very semblable, for who could be more fit to commend this Aequiuocation, a piece of blacke art, than Blackewell? |
A07807 | And can any by any wilfull lie deceiue his owneselfe, as thereby be made ignorant of his owne meaning? |
A07807 | And do not the most of that sort canonize in their conceits all such Popish ones, as haue bene executed for treasons? |
A07807 | And doth not the Gospell it selfe tell vs the same likewise? |
A07807 | And he that killed your last King Henry the third, I meane your Monke Clemens, had he no affinitie with a Priest? |
A07807 | And is not this a safe case for our Soueraigne, trow ye? |
A07807 | And is there any King which feareth God, that can call this exposition rebellious? |
A07807 | And shall not your voice, I am no Priest, which can not possibly expresse( that which you are) a Priest, be a lying voice? |
A07807 | And shall we dare to remooue* The ancient Land- markes of our forefathers? |
A07807 | And shall we thinke the French Kings to exceed our English herei ●? |
A07807 | And was not this his fugere, plainly your subterfugere? |
A07807 | And what matter can there be wherein such a Priest will not aequiuocate, who doth aequiuocate concerning his Priesthood? |
A07807 | And what of this? |
A07807 | And who( I pray you) did commend and magnifie that your Clemens his desperate exploite? |
A07807 | And why was not that[ vt vobis significem] at this time also seasonable for them to vnderstand? |
A07807 | And why? |
A07807 | And will you make him guilty of more than Heathenish Aequiuocation? |
A07807 | And will you say now therefore that Christ did aequiuocate, that is, delude and deceiue his Disciples? |
A07807 | And yet in like case against the secular state obiect Gods prouidence: said I like? |
A07807 | Apostolus nisi Principes& magistratus vocat? |
A07807 | Are all Magistrates in England reputed of your Equiuocators competent Iudges? |
A07807 | As though in warre onely the figh ● ing souldiers were enemies: doth not Reason in the Apologue teach you the contrarie? |
A07807 | But how do you satisfie for Hildebrand? |
A07807 | But how if he be not excommunicate by name? |
A07807 | But how? |
A07807 | But lingua, quo vadis? |
A07807 | But notwithstanding this direct command[ Thou shalt sweare] wilt thou sweare? |
A07807 | But shall one dramme of drosse prooue the whole masse no golde? |
A07807 | But thou wilt say, then truth shall be a murtherer: why? |
A07807 | But were Protestants after this rebellious? |
A07807 | But what can we expect from you, Patrons of lying equiuocation, but in your accusations against Protestants equiuocating lies? |
A07807 | But what doe you professe to prooue? |
A07807 | But what if Kings will not inthrall themselues to the Popes authoritie? |
A07807 | But what kind of motion might this be in those Catholikes which egged them on to this butcherie? |
A07807 | But what say you generally for Priests? |
A07807 | But what thinke you? |
A07807 | But what was the right cause of tumults? |
A07807 | But when? |
A07807 | But whereunto shall I compare this generation? |
A07807 | But why? |
A07807 | But you will say that then they would haue slaine her and haue sought out the strangers: doth it therefore follow that they should find them? |
A07807 | But, it may be he is ignorant; will no ignorance excuse him? |
A07807 | But, you, lately whose deaths haue you not conspired? |
A07807 | By what law? |
A07807 | By whom are they freed? |
A07807 | Can any moderate spirit call this doctrine rebellious? |
A07807 | Can conscience beare witnesse? |
A07807 | Can the one of these be saued by the other mans halter? |
A07807 | Can then any without blasphemy defend the cause of the God of all iustice and truth with a lie? |
A07807 | Can then your vnknowen Reseruation haue approbation by S. Augustine? |
A07807 | Can you be contented to vnderstand the true causes of those mischiefes? |
A07807 | Can you then apply the sentence of holy Ambrose to this order? |
A07807 | Christianae imminet,& vbi nou ● s hostis viget, multò quàm Turea infestior, eò potiùs cursum conuertere oportet? |
A07807 | Common sense might haue replied, How could you tell what was done when you were all asleepe? |
A07807 | Cur Leo tertius Carolum Magnum Imperatorem constituit? |
A07807 | Dare you appeale vnto Logicke? |
A07807 | Dauid sweareth also, but what? |
A07807 | Deny Christ to be God? |
A07807 | Did I not alledge also your most famous Iesuite Gregorie of Valentia for confirmation thereof? |
A07807 | Did euer Ieremie put downe Kings to root them out? |
A07807 | Do not Ministers preach publikely, and people also professe the contrarie? |
A07807 | Do you esteeme any competent and fit, who are Aduersaries to your Romish profession? |
A07807 | Do you then make all Kings in Christendome subiect to the Emperor? |
A07807 | Do you thinke it immoderate? |
A07807 | Doth not the King and whole state enact lawes, and Magistrates execute them to ruinate your Babel? |
A07807 | Doth your Protestant witnesse call them Rebellious Gospellers? |
A07807 | Du ● st these Enginers do anie such thing without direction from their priests? |
A07807 | Esto Propheta, sed nunquid plusquam Propheta? |
A07807 | Father Parsons( in his Dolman) a principall Rector in the Seminarie at Rome? |
A07807 | For what? |
A07807 | For when your Leo Pope as* Taking eares to be hornes, shall iudge truths to be errors, what shall then become of innocents? |
A07807 | God forbid: but to be God of God only in a particular sence, this indeed they do; but can you finde no more Protestants of this opinion? |
A07807 | Haue Popes prerogatiue ouer Kings in causes temporall, as of autority to depose them? |
A07807 | Haue you any thing to except against their practise? |
A07807 | Haue you no Father to father your aequiuocating lie vpon, but only Saint Gregory? |
A07807 | Haue you sayd? |
A07807 | Haue you* One God in Dan, and another in Bethel? |
A07807 | How can you free your selfe from this ielousie, seeing your doctrine is in protestation of not aequiuocating to aequiuocate? |
A07807 | How like you this doctrine of Luther? |
A07807 | How shall his Maiesty be perswaded that these words without all aequiuocation are not spoken in some doubtfull sense and aequiuocation? |
A07807 | How so? |
A07807 | How then? |
A07807 | How will you therefore excuse your selues? |
A07807 | How? |
A07807 | Howsoeuer, who are we that we should censure or limit the power of God? |
A07807 | If it were vniust, why was it i not repealed? |
A07807 | If the case be otherwise, what Quacksaluers be you to offer a salue which can not possibly cure the sore? |
A07807 | If the verity of God haue more abounded through my lie vnto his glory, why do we not euill that good may come thereof? |
A07807 | In his true sence, say you? |
A07807 | Is it bodily? |
A07807 | Is it not as easie for you to turne Iubet, to an i d est, prohibet? |
A07807 | Is it not so? |
A07807 | Is the cause of vs Protestants the same, and shall we be subiect to contrarie Tribunals? |
A07807 | Is this modestie? |
A07807 | Is this the true sense of that Prophecie? |
A07807 | Is this to pray for vs, and not to prey altogether vpon vs? |
A07807 | It may be, some do but doubtingly defend it; what will you iudge of these? |
A07807 | It was the demaund of an whole State for defence of their countrie priuiledge; can any Papist call this rebellious? |
A07807 | Iubet? |
A07807 | King Iames or our late Queene Tyrants? |
A07807 | Let vs grant? |
A07807 | May it be lawfull for vs to aske you by what law this temporall is assumed? |
A07807 | May it now please your sacred Maiestie, to see how exactly they imitate Souldiers in their march? |
A07807 | May this kind of aequiuocating be vsed man oath? |
A07807 | Me thinke I heare our Aequiuocators say, what, no true answer but only he is dead? |
A07807 | No Papist doth iudge any Protestant an Heretike or excommunicate to your knowledge? |
A07807 | No: then was not his oath a veritate, from truth; But did his oath( the second propertie of a true oath) confirme a truth? |
A07807 | Nonnè potuit dicere, scio vbi sint, sed Deum timeo, eos prodere? |
A07807 | Notwithstanding we acknowledge her successiō iust: and after the proclamation of her title, shew vs what Protestant euer resisted? |
A07807 | Now how is it in this your controuersie? |
A07807 | Now let me be beholden vnto you for an Answer, whether that all Protestants of all conditions do not renounce your Romish Religion? |
A07807 | Now then did your Pope Pius erre in excommunicating, and so in condemning an innocent? |
A07807 | Now therefore what a case am I in? |
A07807 | Now what man of common sense doth not know the sense of such speeches? |
A07807 | Now who are you? |
A07807 | Otherwise how is it, that you dare contest g For all Catholikes, not to refuse an oath of allegeance according to the iust proceeding of law? |
A07807 | Quid ad me de his qui foras sunt iudicare? |
A07807 | R. Yea I know it: Q. Wherewith doe you know it? |
A07807 | S. Augustine resolued that the Bishops answer was most honest: what wil our Aequiuocators iudge? |
A07807 | Satisfie vs yet in one question more: Suppose that the Protestant Prince haue a iust quarrell, what then? |
A07807 | Say now( moderate Answerer) will your modestie giue your face leaue to blush at this doctrine of your Cardinall? |
A07807 | Say now, do you thinke his Admonition tollerable? |
A07807 | Say now, will you be sworne to this or no? |
A07807 | Say then what is to be thought of the worthinesse of the fact? |
A07807 | Say, Father Creswell, is this true? |
A07807 | Say, was the information against the Queene vntrue? |
A07807 | Say: this proposition, The Pope is taught to haue a Monarchicall power ouer Kings, and people Democraticall, doth it imply contradiction? |
A07807 | Secondly what haue Protestants done? |
A07807 | Secundam ipsam locutionem dicit Dominus noster nescire se diem& hor ā de sine seculi: quid enim potest esse, quod ipse nesciat? |
A07807 | Sed( inquies) quidsi eos occultatos perscrutando inuenissent? |
A07807 | Shall we call this Religion which dissolueth the dutie of Seruants, Subiects, Debitors, and strangleth the vitall spirits of humane societie? |
A07807 | Shall we thinke that other Priests can haue more loyall spirits? |
A07807 | Shall we thinke that the grand Heretikes, the Arrians, were thus formally denounced? |
A07807 | Sixtus; who Did excommunicate( in that name) the King Nauarre and Prince of Condie? |
A07807 | Sixtus; who a First did confirme the league in France for the vtter destruction of Protestants? |
A07807 | So we driuing out one naile with another, oppose acts to acts, and say; But by what right Popes haue vnthronized Emperors let vs know? |
A07807 | Sometime the Prince is personallie excommunicate, what then? |
A07807 | That no English Protestant is excommunicate by name, how can you warrant vs? |
A07807 | The note:[ Their disobedience herein was lawfull, but their dissembling was euill:] And was not this disobedience lawfull? |
A07807 | The woman is asked, Solde you the land but for so much? |
A07807 | Then sayd Peter, Why hath Satan filled thine heart that thou should''st lie? |
A07807 | Then see, I pray you, how much Christian simplicitie doth abhorre this infatuation? |
A07807 | There is an established Church of Protestants in Sueueland; doe you see no beakons of ● i ● e there which might portend rebellions? |
A07807 | Thinke you so to babish the wisdome of our State, as not Ianus- wise to looke as well before them as behind? |
A07807 | Thinkest thou it vnlawfull to bring a Recusant to the Assises? |
A07807 | This is againe most true: What can you inferre from all this? |
A07807 | This is also true: But why? |
A07807 | This is true: What then? |
A07807 | To conclude, when Saul is slaine by an Amalakite, Dauid entertaineth the murtherer, but how? |
A07807 | To what end doe you breath fire, and why are your mouthes so hot? |
A07807 | To what end? |
A07807 | Vniust? |
A07807 | Was it because they wanted hope of succession? |
A07807 | Was it for want of power? |
A07807 | Was it not the Protestants? |
A07807 | Was not your Reinolds a Priest? |
A07807 | Was the King of Spaine the true owner? |
A07807 | Was therefore God awanting to his Church? |
A07807 | We do likewise acknowledge that some part of those penalties were more aunciently ordained against others, and not against Protestants; What then? |
A07807 | We suspect you will proue an honest man: therefore tell vs, Whom do you hold competent Iudges? |
A07807 | Were euer any Protestants so fantasticall? |
A07807 | What answer could haue beene giuen more resolute and honest than this? |
A07807 | What can be the difference betwixt the oath of our Aequiuocators, and of this blasphemous Arius? |
A07807 | What can this be else( seeing God only is for excellencie called* King of Kings, and Lord of Lords) but an other God? |
A07807 | What can you answer? |
A07807 | What can you inferre from hence? |
A07807 | What could there be in the Protestant? |
A07807 | What else, but as your Garnet answered for your Tresham, I thinke he did aequiuocate? |
A07807 | What ground haue you for such an attempt? |
A07807 | What haue these men done? |
A07807 | What is then the difference? |
A07807 | What is this els then that which we reade,* Man in honour hath no vnderstanding, and is become like the beast that perisheth? |
A07807 | What is this else then to aduance a dogge to be Soueraigne ouer men? |
A07807 | What is this else then to dissolue all communion with Protestants? |
A07807 | What is this? |
A07807 | What is your next claime? |
A07807 | What nothing? |
A07807 | What one is there among all these kinds who can be free from your censures against Heretikes? |
A07807 | What say you to the present point? |
A07807 | What shall I need to mention Reinolds( in his Rostus) a Doctor of Diuinitie, and chiefest man in the English Seminarie at Rhemes? |
A07807 | What shall we say then; is the Soueraignty of Kings disabled? |
A07807 | What shall we then say to the other expositions obiected? |
A07807 | What should the Disciple of Christ say to this Doctour, though he sate in Peters chaire? |
A07807 | What therefore? |
A07807 | What though they then in the Orient of her Maiesties dayes were faithfull? |
A07807 | What was contained in this schedule? |
A07807 | What was his excuse now for his first Answer? |
A07807 | What was their principall Error? |
A07807 | What was then the cause why the Prince of Condie and the Admirall did beare armes? |
A07807 | What will you prooue by this? |
A07807 | What yet more? |
A07807 | What, obstinate? |
A07807 | What? |
A07807 | When being asked, whether you are a Priest, you answer No, what signification hath this word No? |
A07807 | Where is now your iudgement? |
A07807 | Whether But seauen, or But foure, what can this auaile for answer? |
A07807 | Whither shal your next voyage be? |
A07807 | Who are you, I pray you, that can thus define? |
A07807 | Who can be more willing to autorize this Aequiuocation, the Arch- piller of security for Romish Priests, then their Arch- priest? |
A07807 | Whom doe you seeke to destroy? |
A07807 | Whome did they intend to excommunicate in their some hundred Anathema''s? |
A07807 | Why Transeat? |
A07807 | Why iniurious? |
A07807 | Why so? |
A07807 | Why? |
A07807 | Will any iudge otherwise of such an Aequiuocator than of a notorious liar? |
A07807 | Will you make a lie for him, as one lieth for a man? |
A07807 | Will your modestie neuer leaue deluding vs by pretended allegations of Iesuites? |
A07807 | Would you perswade vs to beleeue that by that your protestation, which you teach we need not beleeue by your reseruation? |
A07807 | Yea, Iubet of obedience? |
A07807 | Yet what of Fraunce? |
A07807 | Yet why may not a lying title best befit the doctrine of lying& dissimulation? |
A07807 | You can find no more exception in England, whither will you now? |
A07807 | You will not then contend for all the world; what say you to all Kings in Christendome? |
A07807 | [ We rather obey God then man:] but how? |
A07807 | a Priest? |
A07807 | absolutely depriued of all authoritie? |
A07807 | and did Graue men so iudge of it? |
A07807 | and might he not likewise erre in canonizing an Offendor? |
A07807 | and she sayd, Yea, for so much: and Peter sayd, Why haue you agreed together to tempt the spirit of the Lord? |
A07807 | as actiuely to resist, that is, to rebell against him? |
A07807 | at vbi ponimus voluntatem& potestatem Dei? |
A07807 | by Gods will counselling and approuing it? |
A07807 | by what reason can you challenge my sence of vntruth? |
A07807 | c An igitur, inquiunt, nunquam Principibus resistere liceat? |
A07807 | consequentia est? |
A07807 | f Impudent, subtill, and sactious Heretikes: g For who is if these be not Heretikes? |
A07807 | f Will you proclaime Nauarre a Caluinist King of Fraunce? |
A07807 | for you seeme by this Answer to portend some mischiefe, if it should happen his Maiestie should be excommunicate: say, what euill? |
A07807 | g Shall Catholikes pray, God saue that King, whom they may not admit into their houses? |
A07807 | h For suppose( saith Father Creswell) that he professe to bring in a more sound Religion; what is this to the purpose? |
A07807 | holy Iob hath debated this matter long ago, q Will ye talke deceitfully( saith he) for Gods cause, or will you accept his person? |
A07807 | if they be now extended against Protestants? |
A07807 | if you will be a true Diuine, then learne from our Sauiour,[* Who made me a Iudge ouer you to diuide inheritances among you?] |
A07807 | is it spirituall, as onely to be excommunicate by the Pope? |
A07807 | isto ● … odo dici possit, quidsi turpissi ● … ae mulieri mentienti credere noluissent? |
A07807 | it is but a step to Scotland, what see you there? |
A07807 | iura pe ● … tat? |
A07807 | lemus, deesset vis numerorum aut copiarum? |
A07807 | may you Priests take a corporall oath before a ciuill Magistrate whomsoeuer? |
A07807 | nay who was your author witnessing that there was any such decree? |
A07807 | nonnè tunc rogatus sum vt populum muto sermone mulcerem? |
A07807 | not one of your sect teach violence? |
A07807 | not one word in behalfe of Pope Sixtus? |
A07807 | not to obey man? |
A07807 | now be restored; for to whom and how can this be performed? |
A07807 | of Si quis nostris mandatis? |
A07807 | or were Protestants whom you haue named, of this opinion of Anabaptists? |
A07807 | quibus vitae periculū attulimus? |
A07807 | quid cogitas? |
A07807 | quis tibi periurium tam latam latebram indicauit? |
A07807 | quâ mendacij excusatione si vti vellera, quis me ferret grauium prudentiumque virorum? |
A07807 | reioicing and approuing the act? |
A07807 | they consult with Christ,* Master wilt thou that we command? |
A07807 | this were hard, for so a Christian shuld be bound to be deceiued: may he lawfully suspect you? |
A07807 | to make me guilty of that inference, which I noted to be most detestable in your sect? |
A07807 | unit, quae Gentes restiterent, quae regna non caederent? |
A07807 | viz in Angliam, cu ● us semen adulterinum vix à Turcaico internosci possit? |
A07807 | was he not a Nouice deuoted to be a Priest? |
A07807 | was it rebellion? |
A07807 | were Anabaptists Protestants? |
A07807 | were not Ballard, Gifford, and Gartly secular Priests? |
A07807 | what Minister of the Gospel in all that fierie trial did kindle the least sparke of sedition among her people? |
A07807 | what euill can ensue? |
A07807 | what is that? |
A07807 | what other meaning can armes haue but onely bloud? |
A07807 | when they shall commaund any thing against the lawe of God? |
A07807 | whether was it zeale or fury; Christian iustice, or Antichristian malice? |
A07807 | who were the authors of that decree? |
A07807 | without all aequiuocation? |
A07807 | yea, what though not excommunicate? |
A09111 | & he had answered no, vpon what had fallen the negatiue no? |
A09111 | ( said the Pharises) he answered Non sum: Are 〈 ◊ 〉 Elias? |
A09111 | ( saith Luther against King Henry of England) quis nos coget illi credere? |
A09111 | ( saith he) is the Soueraignty of Kinges disabled? |
A09111 | A Prophet? |
A09111 | After the proclamation of her title( saith he) shew vs what Protestant euer resisted? |
A09111 | And I would demaund him about this matter, whether he will sweare this to be true which he saith of Azor? |
A09111 | And can not euill Kinges and Princes be the cause of corrupting soules also if they should liue wickedly,& permit or induce others to doe the same? |
A09111 | And can there be any more blind boldnes then this? |
A09111 | And did euer man heare so wise a reason? |
A09111 | And do we not say, that all such reserued propositions are true in themselues in the eares of God, and mynd of the speaker? |
A09111 | And do yow not thinke that he knew himselfe heere to lye, and egregiously to Equiuocate in the worst sense? |
A09111 | And doe not we graunt also the same? |
A09111 | And doe we contradict this? |
A09111 | And doe yow see how patient and meeke this man is become now, when there is nothing to suffer? |
A09111 | And doe yow see how this Minister triumpheth? |
A09111 | And doe yow see this folly? |
A09111 | And doe yow so Sir? |
A09111 | And doe yow vnderstand him? |
A09111 | And doth it seeme to yow that Sotus in this place doth go about to conclude all Equiuocators for lyars, as Morton affirmeth? |
A09111 | And how doth he proue this? |
A09111 | And how know wee that these or like wordes were reserued in Christes mind? |
A09111 | And how then dareth he to commit the same so publickly without blushing? |
A09111 | And how then doth this fond, and malicious Minister bring in such Marchinges of Catholicke Soldiers against his Maiesty, who euer 〈 ◊ 〉 for him? |
A09111 | And how then doth this great Moralist condemne all Equiuocators herein as periured lyars? |
A09111 | And how then was his only crime to haue fauoured the Protestants, as this Minister auerreth? |
A09111 | And is it so in deed Syr 〈 ◊ 〉? |
A09111 | And is it so? |
A09111 | And is not this A full satisfaction trow yow? |
A09111 | And is not this a good Iewish Aduocate? |
A09111 | And is not this a goodly manhood trow yow? |
A09111 | And is not this a great obiection? |
A09111 | And is not this a great point, for so great a Rabbyn to bragge of, as of a course which he 〈 ◊ 〉 in all his disputes? |
A09111 | And is not this answered as from a man of his coat? |
A09111 | And is not this goodly stuffe? |
A09111 | And is not this great folly and insolency? |
A09111 | And is not this like to be the bytting of a doggish influence indeed? |
A09111 | And is not this perfidious dealing? |
A09111 | And is not this plaine and cleere saith one? |
A09111 | And is not this secretly to collude with the aduersaries? |
A09111 | And is not this strange dealing? |
A09111 | And is there heere any word peculiar of a Protestant Prince, or of his succession? |
A09111 | And is this naked innocency? |
A09111 | And is this possible? |
A09111 | And not only against vs, but to the whole Church of Rome it selfe, and to the vniuersall Catholike Religiō conioyned therwith? |
A09111 | And now followeth that of the Ghospell Ex ore tuo te indico serue 〈 ◊ 〉: for first I would aske him, is not this Catholicke doctrine? |
A09111 | And now( good Syr) what will yow proue by all this? |
A09111 | And now( saith Doctor Hunnius) what way can be more effectuall then this to ouerthrow Christian Religion, and bring in Arrianisme? |
A09111 | And now, will T. M. allow this also for deuinely spoken? |
A09111 | And should he not be punished in that Court as a periured person, if it were proued against him? |
A09111 | And the very same is to be vnderstood in many other places of Scripture, as that of Isay; Quare errare 〈 ◊ 〉 nos Domine de viis tuis? |
A09111 | And therfore I may aske T. M. why doe yow ly so? |
A09111 | And was not this an ordinary Equiuocation, which Ministers cryed out that Catholickes then vsed, and especially priests? |
A09111 | And were not this formall periury, if he did sweare it in any court whatsoeuer? |
A09111 | And what can be more impious& perilous then this? |
A09111 | And what can be more odiously vrged thē this? |
A09111 | And what doth T. M. reply now to this? |
A09111 | And what then will yow say of this Ministers Equiuocating spirite in the worst kynd of 〈 ◊ 〉? |
A09111 | And what then will yow say to this Equiuocation? |
A09111 | And what will T. M. then say to all this, yea to many expresse examples in Scripture it self? |
A09111 | And what will Thomas Morton now answere to this? |
A09111 | And what will Thomas Morton now say to this? |
A09111 | And what will our Minister then answere to this manifest calumniation so apparently conuinced out of Doctor Barkley? |
A09111 | And what will yow say now of the craftie Equiuocation of these two Ministers? |
A09111 | And where now is the assurance of his vpright conscience protested to his Maiesty in his Epistle dedicatory? |
A09111 | And who shall be Iudge of this? |
A09111 | And who would not thinke but that this accusation were sure, for so much as it is so opprobriously vrged and insulted vpon? |
A09111 | And why cease they not, according to this mans doctrine from so notorious tumultuations against their lawfull Princes? |
A09111 | And why had not this letter in so many yeares byn published to the world for the credit of rhe English seruice, and discredit of the Popes? |
A09111 | And why is all this heat of exclamations? |
A09111 | And why then( I pray yow) do yow call vs Equiuocators? |
A09111 | And will T. M. say, that this was a lye or at least a sacrilegious prophanation of an oath? |
A09111 | And will euer any man credit T. M. any more in any thing that he alledgeth, when this conscienceles falsification is once discouered in him? |
A09111 | And will you heare his manhood in sound deuinity? |
A09111 | And will yow say now that Caluin is not worthy to haue his fee of the Arrians? |
A09111 | And would not yow thinke that Morton did hold himselfe very free from this perfidiousnes, that obiecteth the same so freely against vs? |
A09111 | And would yow not thinke that this desire, this intreaty, this vrging, and prouocation did proceed from a great confidence in his cause? |
A09111 | And yet yow thinke yow are a Priest? |
A09111 | Approuers of Equiuocation in certaine cases, who they be? |
A09111 | Are not these Indians new Christians as the other in Iury were? |
A09111 | Are these things suffred to passe without controlment in England? |
A09111 | As also the many, great, and strong argumentes, that Bellarmine alledgeth to proue his assertion? |
A09111 | But I would aske him of what doctrine? |
A09111 | But I would aske him why? |
A09111 | But I would aske him, Is not Christ Priest ouer vs aswel as for vs? |
A09111 | But I would aske the poore man, why he doth alleadge this place? |
A09111 | But I would make this demaund, how came 〈 ◊ 〉 particuler men to be States,& to be called the Common- wealth? |
A09111 | But how doth he now defend this note of our English Ministers, allowing the deposition and putting to death of Princes? |
A09111 | But in the Latin neither heere, nor in the Canon it selfe is there any such interrogation at all, as why doe yow so? |
A09111 | But let the Minister tell vs, who shall be Iudge of this, who shall determine the case? |
A09111 | But now what writeth M. Iewell of him, and with what truth and conscience? |
A09111 | But what doth he accuse vs of in effect? |
A09111 | But what is all this to the purpose? |
A09111 | But what is this to the purpose? |
A09111 | But what saith Caluin? |
A09111 | But what saith Caluin? |
A09111 | But what saith this Doctor Genesius? |
A09111 | But what saith 〈 ◊ 〉 on their side? |
A09111 | But what wil yow say, if I haue sworne? |
A09111 | But what? |
A09111 | But what? |
A09111 | But why had he not adioyned also, that if he were careles of his flocke, then Gregory must be his name, which importeth a vigilant pastor? |
A09111 | Can any thing be more fraudently alledged? |
A09111 | Can any thing be more ridiculous then this? |
A09111 | Can any thing conuince more our Ministers Calumniation then this? |
A09111 | Can conscience beare witnes, then can it also speake? |
A09111 | Can the Reader tolerate such an impertinent writer? |
A09111 | Can these thinges stād togeather? |
A09111 | Can this be ignorance? |
A09111 | Common sense( saith he) might haue replyed( to the souldiers) what could yow tell what was done when yow were all a sleepe? |
A09111 | Could any Infidell speake more cōtēptuously of our proofes? |
A09111 | Could the Arrians doe more for themselues, or their owne cause? |
A09111 | Did Albertus Magnus, S. Thomas of Aquin, and so many others of that ranke know logicke? |
A09111 | Did Thomas Morton euer finde in any Catholicke writer such wordes, or sense in preiudice of Princes? |
A09111 | Do not all Princes know, that Innocentius is truly the elected of God? |
A09111 | Do not all sortes of men euen by the instinct of nature it self vse and practice this, without any instruction at all? |
A09111 | Doe yow heare this new Prophet declare himself cleerly? |
A09111 | Doe yow see his poore flattering shift? |
A09111 | Doe yow see the essence of his doctrine? |
A09111 | Doe yow see the malice of the man? |
A09111 | Doe yow see the prophanity of this mans spirit? |
A09111 | Doth not Genesius himselfe in the very Chapter heere cited alleadge both S. Hierome and S. Augustine for this interpretation, and alloweth the same? |
A09111 | Doth this take away the doctrine it self? |
A09111 | Et respondit non: Are yow a Prophet? |
A09111 | First, he saith, that our owne ancient expositor Lyranus in his Commentary, holdeth that Ieremy did not ly, but what of this? |
A09111 | For as all Deuines hold, that which may lawfully be said may also lawfully be sworne, what will T. M. answere tò this? |
A09111 | For if our Sauiour had byn asked, Is this maid dead? |
A09111 | For if vpon this cause she were excommunicated, what parte had Ca holicks therin? |
A09111 | For what certainty can T. M. haue( thinke yow) against the bodily 〈 ◊ 〉 of our Blessed Lady, his assertion being a bare negatiue? |
A09111 | For what hath any Pope done against the Protestant Kings of Denmarke in this our age? |
A09111 | For what high tribunall( I pray yow) hath logicke in deuinity? |
A09111 | For what? |
A09111 | For what? |
A09111 | For where doth he fynd these marchinges against his Maiesty? |
A09111 | Francorum, Anglorum, Hispanorum,& postremò Romanorum Rex Innocentium in Papam suscipiunt& recognoscunt 〈 ◊ 〉 Episcopum animarum suarum? |
A09111 | Gabriel Biel a very Religious learned man? |
A09111 | Goodman also, Gilby, VVhittingham, Knox, Buchanan, and others neerer home vnto vs? |
A09111 | Had these souldyers an opinion perhaps that their Priests could not sinne? |
A09111 | Hath God and nature left no lawfull manner of euasion, by force of wit and reason whereby a man may deliuer himself from such an incumbrance? |
A09111 | Hath Sayer any such word or sentence? |
A09111 | Hath he aduentured his life to gaine those soules vnto Christ, that dyed for them, as others haue donne? |
A09111 | Hath he no honester comparisons to bring in then the blind loue of Thais, and embracing of Helena? |
A09111 | Hath he perchance euer byn there? |
A09111 | Henricus de Gandauo Archdeacon of Tornay? |
A09111 | How can this be true M. Morton in plaine and literail sense, and without some amphibology or Equiuocation? |
A09111 | How doth foolish vanity discouer it selfe in all these mens wordes& actions? |
A09111 | How doth he talke of such kylling of supposed Philisthines by the iaw- bone of an asse? |
A09111 | How impertinent then is this proofe? |
A09111 | How then is this to the purpose? |
A09111 | How then will yow, or can yow defend it? |
A09111 | I might 〈 ◊ 〉 heere to this effect and purpose, that ambiguous and equiuocall answere of the said S. Iohn about Elias, Elias es tu? |
A09111 | If therfore the Prophet had byn demaunded; shall not Ezechias liue any longer? |
A09111 | If they did not, how did they write so many large and learned Treatises therof? |
A09111 | If they did, why doth Thomus Morton except against them all in this science? |
A09111 | In what place do they so sound out the word Amen, to the likenesse of a certayne heauenly thunder? |
A09111 | Iohn Caluin vvhether he fauoured 〈 ◊ 〉 or no? |
A09111 | Iohn Gerson Chancellour of that Vniuersity? |
A09111 | Is he not ashamed of this so shamefull ouersight? |
A09111 | Is it not ours? |
A09111 | Is not all this so? |
A09111 | Is not this a full satisfaction, according to the title of his booke? |
A09111 | Is not this a very childish ouerlashing? |
A09111 | Is not this by dissimulation to weakē our owne forces in fauour of the enemies? |
A09111 | Is not this great simplicity, to presume a grant and to plead that grant in print, wheras the thing is euidently denyed? |
A09111 | Is not this pernicious Equiuocation on one side to call vpon him& on the other to reiect him? |
A09111 | Is not this sensles? |
A09111 | Is not this to accuse and defend, affirme and deny, and to speake contraries with one and the same breath? |
A09111 | Is not this wickedly to betray the cause of Christians? |
A09111 | Is not this wilfull, and malicious fraude? |
A09111 | Is the hand of God shortened? |
A09111 | Is there no meane between these two extreames? |
A09111 | Is this any way to be mainteined by any shew or shift whatsoeuer? |
A09111 | Is this for a man that somuch abhorreth Equiuocation? |
A09111 | Is this honesty in a Minister? |
A09111 | Is this iustifiable( for he calleth this Treatise a iustification of Protestantes?) |
A09111 | Is this manhood? |
A09111 | Is this sound deuinity? |
A09111 | Is this the assurance 〈 ◊ 〉 his vpright conscience, wherof he braggeth to his Maiesty? |
A09111 | Is this true I say? |
A09111 | It may be, some doe but doubtingly defend it, what will yow iudge of these? |
A09111 | Lo heere, and doe not these men find Scriptures for all purposes? |
A09111 | May not any number of rebells make themselues a state in this sense? |
A09111 | Morton is proued to be? |
A09111 | Morton, and that in print? |
A09111 | Mortons whole Treatise: and how doe yow thinke will he play the man heere to auoid all this battery? |
A09111 | Nay doth not all this speach of Iansenius make wholy against Morton? |
A09111 | Nay is it not rather babish childhood, that seemeth not to know the very first Elementes of true deuinity? |
A09111 | Nay why did he adde further, O Dionyse, O Anacletus, O Sixtus, as though he had followed their doctrine also, or admitted their authority? |
A09111 | No truly? |
A09111 | Now then how doe yow thinke that T. M. shifteth of this charge? |
A09111 | Now then what hath all this to doe with Contumax Haereticus tam praesumptus quàm manifestus? |
A09111 | Numquid( saith he) non omnes Principes cognouerunt, quia ipse est verè Dei electus? |
A09111 | Obstinacy necessary to make heresy, and vvhy? |
A09111 | Or did they hold this for 〈 ◊ 〉 point of doctrine, determined vnto them out of Moyses chayre? |
A09111 | Or doe not the same thinges remaine in Holinshed, Hooker, Harison, Thyn, and other writers aswell English as Scottish? |
A09111 | Or doe not we teach that temporall Princes power ought principally, as S. Leo saith, to extend it self to the defence ad preseruation of the Church? |
A09111 | Or doth all this proue that this was not their doctrine? |
A09111 | Or doth it proue that those first Ghospellers held it not? |
A09111 | Or doth not this also proue him to be one of those forenamed Doctors, that vnderstand not what they say, or wherof they affirme? |
A09111 | Or if te y did not, how is this their fact attributed by Thomas Morton vnto that 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉? |
A09111 | Or to omit externe writers, did our famous Countreymen, Alexander of Hales, Scotus, Burley, Middleton, Occham and others know Logicke? |
A09111 | Or was not Queene Maries title yet proclaimed? |
A09111 | Or who gaue her this tribunall? |
A09111 | Or why do yow corrupt your Author so? |
A09111 | Or why doe yow delude your Reader so? |
A09111 | Or will Thomas Morton say still that our malignant Doctors doe wrongfully accuse him? |
A09111 | Or will yow say, as yow said before, that their iudgment hath byn depraued by our malignant Doctors? |
A09111 | Or will yow thinke it rather folly then falshood, that could not discerne betweene verò and verè? |
A09111 | Petrus Paludanus Patriarch afterward of Hierusalem? |
A09111 | Propheta es tu? |
A09111 | Prophetam? |
A09111 | Quisest Augustinus? |
A09111 | Secondly there is wilfull deceipt in leauing out the first wordes of the Author, Sed quid dices, si iuraui? |
A09111 | Shew vs what Protestant euer resisted? |
A09111 | Supremacy impugned by diuers Protestants in the beginning and vvhy? |
A09111 | THE THIRD PART OF THIS CHAPTER, CONTEYNING A CONTROVERSY: VVhether Caluin did fauour Arrianisme, or no? |
A09111 | That our mixt reserued propositions are not ambiguous, doubtfull, and equiuocall? |
A09111 | The countries spoiled? |
A09111 | The people slaine and murdered about this difference? |
A09111 | The third Part of this Chapter, VVhether the former mixt Proposition, partly vttered, and partly reserued, be 〈 ◊ 〉 or noe? |
A09111 | The townes and villages burnt and ouerthrowne? |
A09111 | The woman is asked( saith he:) Sould yow the land for so much? |
A09111 | This is the force of the argument: what answereth he therunto? |
A09111 | To whome doth this voice of the Cryer in the desert speake, vnto faithfull people? |
A09111 | Truly if the confidence were not great, the crafte and dissimulation was singuler: but what ensued? |
A09111 | VVhat can be more carnally spoken, more wickedly, sacrilegiously, and blasphemously, then that of Hierome, Virginitas caelum, coniugium terram replet? |
A09111 | VVhether he fauoured Arrianisme, or noe? |
A09111 | Was it not a figure also of many thinges vpon earth, which should be fulfilled in the new Testament? |
A09111 | Was not heere wilfull deceipt, nay 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 will and desire of deceauing? |
A09111 | Were not their Cerimonies and Sacrifices a figure of our Sacramentes& Sacrifice? |
A09111 | Were they not Protestantes that were authors therof? |
A09111 | What Equiuocation then call yow this in M. Iewell? |
A09111 | What any thing absolutly? |
A09111 | What can yow answere? |
A09111 | What certainty against the miracles wrought by God in the Indies? |
A09111 | What dealing, what conscience, what truth is this? |
A09111 | What doth the Minister now Reply vpon large and mature deliberation in this his full satisfaction? |
A09111 | What extreme impudency is this in a Minister? |
A09111 | What falshood is this then to alledge Authors thus directly against their owne sense, meaning, and whole drift? |
A09111 | What impiety were it to affirme this defect to be in Christes Kingly gouernment, and consequētly what folly is it to bring in such reasons? |
A09111 | What of such lying, and perfidious Equiuocation? |
A09111 | What reioynder would our minister make? |
A09111 | What shall I say more, or what shall I complaine more? |
A09111 | What shall we stand wrangling with this Minister, or any his like, about possibilities or coniecturall probabilities? |
A09111 | What shameles dealing then is this of our Minister to charge Genesius with such folly or impiety which he neuer thought of? |
A09111 | What then will Thomas Morton say to this? |
A09111 | What then? |
A09111 | What triall, what witnes can haue place if this kind of answering may be admitted? |
A09111 | What will he say to the Rebellion of Syr Thomas VVyat and his confederates in Kent ensuing about the same time? |
A09111 | What will he say to the cōspiracies ensuing after this againe, from Syr Edward Courtney Earle of Deuonshire, Syr Nicolas Throckmorton,& others? |
A09111 | When was it euer seene that the iudgment of the Church did take authority from the Emperour? |
A09111 | Wherwith doe yow know it? |
A09111 | Who can belieue this Minister at his word herafter? |
A09111 | Who can number the Citties beseiged, taken, rifled and ransacked? |
A09111 | Who is Augustine? |
A09111 | Who is like rather to be bitten of the highest dogg, eyther we or yow that can not tell what yow say or proue, eyther for yow, or against your selfe? |
A09111 | Who saith so? |
A09111 | Who then shall ryse in Iudgment against Thomas Morton, for all this wilfull lying? |
A09111 | Who would argue thus but Thomas Morton? |
A09111 | Who would not thinke that this were more then only permission? |
A09111 | Who would say so, but M. Iewell, who careth not what he saith? |
A09111 | Why doe they not then put it in practice? |
A09111 | Why is not this doctrine of the Scripture of perfecting their vertue by bearing and suffering admitted by them? |
A09111 | Why then doe his Protestāt Captaines& Leaders vse them? |
A09111 | Why? |
A09111 | Will Sepulueda deny all those Fathers alleadged by me before for our interpretation to be Fathers? |
A09111 | Will T. M. deny this? |
A09111 | Will he condemne all such stratagems as sinfull, as heathenish, as hellish, as impious? |
A09111 | Will he haue them all made away from the face of the Earth? |
A09111 | Will he haue them to liue in perpetuall torment, hatred, suspicions, iealosyes, auersions, detestations,& deadly hostilities, the one with the other? |
A09111 | Will he not be ashamed to see himself cōuinced ofso great and shameles ouerlashing? |
A09111 | Will our Minister face out this? |
A09111 | Would it not haue directly signified( as his words be) that he had not knowne therof in deed? |
A09111 | Would yow not thinke that the man had spoken somewhat to the purpose, that thus concludeth? |
A09111 | Yow shall heare his shift( for he is much troubled with his Maiesties obseruation:) VVhat shall we say then? |
A09111 | and that the Sea Apostolike graunteth out full priuiledge of lying, as before yow haue heard him auouch? |
A09111 | and vnder the German Emperour in diuers partes of his dominions( all Catholicke Princes) and in the free- cityes of the Empyre? |
A09111 | and was not the censure of the Puritanes cast of a little before in regard of like passion? |
A09111 | and will yow stand to it, and leese your credit if this be falsely or calumniously alleadged? |
A09111 | and would not his hearers haue taken it so? |
A09111 | answere to all this thinke yow? |
A09111 | appoint vs lawes of liuing, and the like? |
A09111 | as also the passing of the Red- sea by the Israelites? |
A09111 | as namely in his Lords Court of the Arches? |
A09111 | but especially in him, that professeth himselfe a Minister of simple truth? |
A09111 | can this be done but of purpose, and consequently by a guilty conscience? |
A09111 | deserueth he not a laurell for this conquest? |
A09111 | did Maldonate say, that all Greeke copies had it so? |
A09111 | did S. Paul lye in this Equiuocation? |
A09111 | did all this I say any thing auaile her or procure her safty or quietnes, in gouerning these new Ghospellers? |
A09111 | did his Protestant- Authors before mencioned write or teach this doctrine whē they were pressed by their Catholicke Princes to be quiet? |
A09111 | did the Sea of Rome or any Bishop therof euer goe about to hurt or preiudice him? |
A09111 | doth he not heere call the Author therof Cunerus, ours? |
A09111 | doth it not speake also indifferently of all sortes of Religion, of what side soeuer the truth be? |
A09111 | doth not S. Paul in the ninth and tenth of his first Epistle to the Corinthians set down many examples to this effect? |
A09111 | doth not he binde and loose our sinnes? |
A09111 | doth not he prescribe vs Sacramentes? |
A09111 | doth this become a Minister of simple truth? |
A09111 | doth 〈 ◊ 〉 himselfe agree to that opinion? |
A09111 | etiam dico vobis& plus quàm Prophetam: What went yow forth to see in the desert? |
A09111 | fit for a Chaplyn of my Lord of Canterbury? |
A09111 | fit for a booke? |
A09111 | fit for a print? |
A09111 | hath he not a spirituall and Priestly iurisdiction ouer our soules? |
A09111 | how did Catholickes and Arrians liue so many yeares togeather vnder Arrian Kinges and Emperours in old times, both in Spaine and els 〈 ◊ 〉? |
A09111 | how doe Catholickes and Protestantes liue togeather at this day vnder the most Christian King of France? |
A09111 | how many hath it molested, censured, deposed, or troubled for the same? |
A09111 | how then are we so blinded with the loue of our Thais, as rather to snatch at any meaning, then take that which is meant? |
A09111 | how then doth he affirme euery where, that our doctrine teacheth killing of Princes? |
A09111 | may a man swear this in your Lordes Court of the Arches? |
A09111 | may not M. Mortons Epithets of hellish, heathenish, impious, and sacrilegious, haue place heere? |
A09111 | nay doth not the text speake plainly of making a King where none is? |
A09111 | or can any man excuse him from falshood and malice in this open treachery? |
A09111 | or doe not these actions appertaine vnto him as high Priest ouer his Church? |
A09111 | or doth this proue that we ascribe Democraticall soueraignity ouer Kings vnto the people? |
A09111 | or had he committed 〈 ◊ 〉 prophanation if he had sworne it? |
A09111 | or of what weight it is, or may be for his purpose? |
A09111 | or that he himselfe was of that opinion? |
A09111 | or that the most ancient, and purest did so read? |
A09111 | or was his dissimulation impious, for that one part was deceaued? |
A09111 | or what will you do with such men? |
A09111 | or who shall compell vs to beleeue him? |
A09111 | shall he be credited herafter? |
A09111 | that Popes can not be Heretickes, or be deposed for the same? |
A09111 | their Manna of our Eucharist? |
A09111 | their being baptized in the cloude? |
A09111 | their circumcisions and washinges, figures of our Baptisme? |
A09111 | their drinking out of the rock, which 〈 ◊ 〉 Christ? |
A09111 | their food of the Manna? |
A09111 | vnder the great King of Polonia? |
A09111 | vnder the state of Venice? |
A09111 | was not this singuler and extraordinary, yea hypocrisy, and lying Equiuocation in the highest degree? |
A09111 | was there no deuinity before Logicke was inuented by the Philosophers? |
A09111 | were not these thinges to be fulfilled aswell vpon earth as in heauen? |
A09111 | were they not first subiectes? |
A09111 | what Minister of the Ghospell in all that fiery triall did kindle the least spark of sedition among her people? |
A09111 | what against diuers other particular Princes both of the Empire and otherwise, who haue in this our age departed from the obedience of that Sea? |
A09111 | what against those of Sweueland either Father or Sonne, though the later doth offer open iniury to a Catholicke King the true inheritor? |
A09111 | what may the hearer belieue of all he saith, when euery where he is found intangled with such foolish treachery? |
A09111 | what say yow M. Morton? |
A09111 | what wilfull wrangling is this in a turbulent Minister? |
A09111 | when being asked whether yow are a Priest, yow 〈 ◊ 〉 no, what signification hath this word no? |
A09111 | where haue yow buryed him? |
A09111 | where his naked innocency? |
A09111 | where is his simplicity in Christ Iesus? |
A09111 | who will deny this? |
A09111 | who would say it but T. M? |
A09111 | why doe his Protestāt Ministers that liue with them allow therof? |
A09111 | why had not he cyted some place or testimony wherby might appeare this to be true that he obiecteth heere to these mē against his Highnes? |
A09111 | why hast thou made vs:( o Lord) to erre from thy wayes? |
A09111 | why should he deny it to be a true proposition? |
A09111 | will he deny it to be a dissimulation, and consequently also an Equiuocation in fact? |
A09111 | will he hold that all kind of Equiuocation is lying? |
A09111 | will he say that their exposition is contrary to all common sense? |
A09111 | will he still defend, that there is nothing but lying in Rome? |
A09111 | yea hellish and heathnish Equiuocators for vsing the same? |
A09111 | yea vnder the Pope himselfe? |
A09106 | & c. Did the priesthood of Iewry cōfirme this answer? |
A09106 | & c. where is this Man, the new select Aduocate for this cause? |
A09106 | & now aboue fiftie more newly added out of the said Reply, which are set downe in my seauenth Chapter? |
A09106 | & this very place here quoted by M. Morton, togeather with another of Toletus to the same effect? |
A09106 | & wil not he yet blush at this new fraud of his discouered? |
A09106 | ( for he saith but Vide) to the sermō of S. Ambrose, and this other place cyted out of the same sermon? |
A09106 | ( saith he) Mansueta quid fecit? |
A09106 | 11. which is shewed to import as much as whē a Priest is vnlaw ● ully demaunded, Are you a Priest? |
A09106 | 11.? |
A09106 | 45 VVhere is now( saith he) the boast of P. R. for Sriptures, Fathers, Reasons? |
A09106 | 84 18 About Emanuel S ●: whether he contradicteth all Equiuocation? |
A09106 | And I would demaund M. Mortō about this matter, whether he will sweare this to be true which he sayth of Azor? |
A09106 | And can there be any greater cōtradiction the ● this? |
A09106 | And can there be any more vntrue dealing then this? |
A09106 | And can there be any more witting and wilfull falshood then this? |
A09106 | And consequently these foure examples dissembled by him are foure seuerall falshoods wittingly and willingly cōmitted? |
A09106 | And could any say thus ● ut a ly ● r? |
A09106 | And could this be playne dealing? |
A09106 | And did he not herin speake to the purpose? |
A09106 | And did not he know, that he lyed when he wrote this? |
A09106 | And did not this require some answere also among the rest? |
A09106 | And did you euer heare a sober man in this tune? |
A09106 | And do I then heere play Legier- de- main cōueying rings into other mens pockets, and changing Holinshed into Fox? |
A09106 | And do you heare him how he croweth? |
A09106 | And do you not thinke that the letters T. M. may receyue in like manner variety of such allusions? |
A09106 | And do you thinke that he will stand to these Canons now alleadged? |
A09106 | And do yow see how this Mynister tryumpheth? |
A09106 | And do yow thinke, that he will be a true Conuertite in deed? |
A09106 | And doth it seeme to you, that Sotus in this place doth go about to conclude all Equiuocators for lyars, as M. Morton affirmeth? |
A09106 | And doth not euery body see the vanity of this inference? |
A09106 | And doth not the discrete Reader see by these manner of Challenges, that the man hath more need of compassion& commiseration from me then confutation? |
A09106 | And finally you demand in great brauery; VVhere is this man P. R. himsel ● e, the new select Aduocate ● or this cause? |
A09106 | And from whome? |
A09106 | And had I not rea ● ● n to note such a slippery shift deuised by M. Morton 〈 ◊ 〉 a scoffe against a Catholike learned Authour? |
A09106 | And hath not this contumelious Minister, that so desperatly presumeth thus to speake, a wi ● e and good benefices? |
A09106 | And haue not we alleaged three for his one to the contrary? |
A09106 | And haue you euer heard more confident ● each? |
A09106 | And heere now I must demand of the Reader what he vnderstandeth M. Morton his purpose to be in this place? |
A09106 | And heere now I would demaund M. Morton in sincerity, did he meane of our Priests and doctours in generall, or noe? |
A09106 | And how could he thinke this, if sometymes at leastwise( as he confesseth) he vttered all in English, and this to English men? |
A09106 | And how doth M. Morton now in this his Preambling Reply, endeauour to satisfie these two charges? |
A09106 | And how doth this strike the nayle on the head for M. Morton? |
A09106 | And how impertinent then is it for M. Morton in these two things to frame a contradiction? |
A09106 | And how then dareth he to commit the same so publikely without blushing? |
A09106 | And how then did he make that stout deniall before mentioned in two or three bouts, and now the third tyme doth stand in it also? |
A09106 | And how then do our Ministers so raue against it? |
A09106 | And how then doth he auouch it? |
A09106 | And how then doth he conuince me of falshood? |
A09106 | And how then is this called a fall recouerable by no excuse? |
A09106 | And how thē doth this great Morali ● ● condemne all Equiuocators herin as periured lyars? |
A09106 | And if he be not able to ● efend them before man, how will he iustifie thē ● efore God? |
A09106 | And if it doth not, as euery man seeth, why then is it brought in h ● e ● e in this place for a seuerall obiection of fa ● shood against me? |
A09106 | And is it so Syr? |
A09106 | And is not this a full satisfaction trow you? |
A09106 | And is not this a good fourth witn ● sse to ioyne with the former for discrediting of Pope Gregory? |
A09106 | And is not this a goodly answere? |
A09106 | And is not this a goodly deduction? |
A09106 | And is not this a great inference, when he should conuince me of wilfull falsity? |
A09106 | And is not this a legall record? |
A09106 | And is not this a p ● easāt iest to escape by? |
A09106 | And is not this a strange euasion in him, that ● rofesseth such skill in Logike, yea to haue bene a ● ublike reader of Logike? |
A09106 | And is not this an ordinary practise euen amongst the best men of what religiō soeuer, and such as most of all do detest lying? |
A09106 | And is not this great folly& insolency? |
A09106 | And is not this our Case plainly? |
A09106 | And is not this perfidious dealing? |
A09106 | And is not this probable? |
A09106 | And is not this strange dealing? |
A09106 | And is not this then mere trifling? |
A09106 | And is not this to play his soule vpon lesse then tre- trip? |
A09106 | And is this a good witnes? |
A09106 | And is this good dealing euen in the very first case which he proposeth a ● ter the Conquest? |
A09106 | And is this naked innocency& c? |
A09106 | And is this plaine dealing? |
A09106 | And is this possible? |
A09106 | And is this simplicity in writing? |
A09106 | And may he not fill vp bookes, if he will, with such toyes? |
A09106 | And not only against vs, but to the whole Church of Rome it selfe, and to the vniuersall Catholicke Religiō conioyned therwith? |
A09106 | And now will any man say, but M. Morton, that the learned Iesuit Emanuel Sà, is a good witnesse against all vse of Equiuocation? |
A09106 | And shall this in like manner be iudged from the purpose, and a Nihil dicit? |
A09106 | And should he not be punished in that Court, as a periured person, if it were proued against him? |
A09106 | And that as he held the one for iustified, so did he hould the other for iustifiable, and that herin there was no exception to be made? |
A09106 | And that it was impossible to be true? |
A09106 | And that of the Priest to be as vnlawfull as the other of the woman? |
A09106 | And the styrring vp of euery child of truth to attention, make euery man witnesse of his owne disgrace? |
A09106 | And therefore I may aske T. M. why do you lye so? |
A09106 | And therefore for me to change voluntarily these names, Cui bono? |
A09106 | And told also a manifest lye of Thodoret? |
A09106 | And was not all this to the purpose? |
A09106 | And was not this a Nimium dicit in like manner? |
A09106 | And was not this a cunning cut? |
A09106 | And was not this graue matter, thinke you, for a Iudge to treate in that place and auditory? |
A09106 | And was not this worthy of some consideration in his answere? |
A09106 | And was this a good exāple to proue that it was a law at that tyme, that euery Queene might take,& giue solely without the King her husband? |
A09106 | And was this also ● rom the purpose, to proue that Queene Elizabeth could not haue it? |
A09106 | And were not his shame the greater, yf he should be ouercome by him? |
A09106 | And were not this formall periury, if he did sweare it in any Court whatsoeuer? |
A09106 | And were this now substantiall dealing for satisfaction of his creditours? |
A09106 | And what can be more odiously vrged then this? |
A09106 | And what doth T. M. now reply to this? |
A09106 | And what doth he inferre heerof thinke you? |
A09106 | And what els? |
A09106 | And what hath now M. Morton to reply to these so euident and important differences, that make the one answere lawfull, the other a lye? |
A09106 | And what inconuenience hath this doctrine that it should be called Childhood and babish grammer? |
A09106 | And what inferreth this? |
A09106 | And what inuincible argumēt hath M. Morton, thinke you, now to proue that they are all one? |
A09106 | And what is this to so long and large a discourse as mine was? |
A09106 | And what is this to the purpose then, to proue that th ● se Authors did erre wittingly against their conscience? |
A09106 | And what may not be defended or deluded in this sort? |
A09106 | And what now doth there result against Bellarmine in all this obiection? |
A09106 | And what now is there heere in Costerus his speach about the lying of Romanists or Roman VVriters? |
A09106 | And what then shall wee say of the Dolphin of France, when he commeth to yeares to succ ● ed in that Crowne, after the death of the King his father? |
A09106 | And what triall will you make of their spirits heere? |
A09106 | And what will Syr Edward now say to this also? |
A09106 | And what will our Minister then answere to this manifest calumniation so apparently conuinced out of D. Barkley? |
A09106 | And what will yee say of this manner of dealing? |
A09106 | And where is now( saith he) P. R. his boast of ● criptures, Fathers, Reasons? |
A09106 | And whether you haue vsed true dealing in the manner of recounting the same? |
A09106 | And who shall be iudge of this? |
A09106 | And who would haue brought in this for an example of wilfull falshood but only M. Morton? |
A09106 | And why had not this Letter in so many yeares byn published to the world for the credit of the English Seruice, and discredit of the Popes? |
A09106 | And why then had not he answered somwhat to this Charge, being so weighty,& substantiall as it is? |
A09106 | And why thinke you ● i d M. Morton conceale these two Fathers names? |
A09106 | And will Syr Edward Cooke say, that this was frō the purpose,& a Nihil dicit? |
A09106 | And will any man of sense belieue this to be true? |
A09106 | And will he still stand to his former assertion, that the Brytish lawes were neuer altered by the Romās? |
A09106 | And will ye not take pitty of this mans passion? |
A09106 | And will you heare his manhood in sound diuinity? |
A09106 | And yet as though he had taken me at a great aduantage, he runneth to his accustomed ridiculous interrogations: VVhat excuse now shall P. R. make? |
A09106 | And ● aue you heard this craking? |
A09106 | Are not these actions opposite to Iesuites? |
A09106 | Are not these ingenious iests? |
A09106 | Are you a Prophet? |
A09106 | As also by wilfull erring( if it had bene an errour,) in counting how many times M. Morton had set downe the Clause of reseruation in latin? |
A09106 | As also the many great& strōg argumēts that Bellarmyne alleageth to proue his assertion? |
A09106 | As for example when S. Iohn Baptist was dem ● nded, Propheta es tu? |
A09106 | At what time? |
A09106 | Behold heere a whole change of lawes denied so resolutly by our two Iustices as you haue heard before: were they good Antiquaries in this thinke yow? |
A09106 | But I would aske him of what doctrine? |
A09106 | But I would aske him why? |
A09106 | But doth not the malicious man see, that the same inference may be made of all Professours of other Religions in like manner? |
A09106 | But first how doth he proue that she had ● his meaning of reseruation in her mind? |
A09106 | But how now( thinke you) doth all this conuince, or so much as accuse me of any willfull falsitie? |
A09106 | But how will he proue it thinke you? |
A09106 | But i ● may ● e( saith he) that he which doubteth is ignorant: ● ill no ignorance excuse him? |
A09106 | But in the Latyn neither here, nor in the Canon it selfe, is there any such interrogation at all, as why do you so? |
A09106 | But now perhaps the reader will demād what hath M. Morton answered to these two Chapters in this his Preamblatorie Reply? |
A09106 | But now what hath M. Morton eyther against vs, or for himselfe out of this case? |
A09106 | But now what hath Maldonatus here in the sentence alleaged, that I should willinglie pretermit to answere, as being ouermatched therewith? |
A09106 | But now what of this? |
A09106 | But now( to returne to the matter) what is this against our Clause of Reseruation in a propositiō or sentence? |
A09106 | But now, what if this be noe fault or contradiction at all in P. R. either pardonable or not pardonable? |
A09106 | But to come to the matter, what saith he to the point it self of iustifying his allegation of the vn ● ruth of Lambertus against Pope Gregory? |
A09106 | But what argument will M. Morton frame out of these my words? |
A09106 | But what do you professe to proue? |
A09106 | But what infelicitie is this vnto my imputation out of Lābertus? |
A09106 | But what is this to the purpose? |
A09106 | But what is this to the ● urpose? |
A09106 | But what of this? |
A09106 | But what saith he heere for his defence? |
A09106 | But what saith this Doctor Genesius? |
A09106 | But what will you say, if I haue sworne? |
A09106 | But wheron I pray you is this ir ● epugnable consequence grounded? |
A09106 | But why had not M. Morton mentioned Vrspergensis at the firs ●? |
A09106 | But why is this impudencie? |
A09106 | But why said he nothing to this, seing it hath more difficulty in it, then many other layd togeather? |
A09106 | But ô M. Morton, let me pose you heere: Is it true that your aduersary sayd, so farre, and no further to the purpose in hand? |
A09106 | By Fathers? |
A09106 | By whome? |
A09106 | Can M. Morton answere any thing to this so lewd& wilfull absurdity? |
A09106 | Can any thing be more fraudulētly alleadged? |
A09106 | Can any thing be more ridiculous then this? |
A09106 | Can he deny but that the Bishop of Rome is tearmed Apostolus and Apostolicus almost eu ● ry where in the same ancient lawes? |
A09106 | Can there any match be found to this? |
A09106 | Can there be any defence of this so apparent abuse? |
A09106 | Can there be any more poore and miserable dealing then this? |
A09106 | Can there be any more wilfull& witting fraud, then this? |
A09106 | Can there be more wilfull malice then this? |
A09106 | Can there be ● ny greater absurdity then this, to promise wilfull falshood, and then to alleadge only diuersity of opinions? |
A09106 | Can these fraudes be committed but of deliberation and set purpose? |
A09106 | Can these things stand togeather? |
A09106 | Comm ● n s ● ns ●( sayth he) might haue r ● ply ● d, how could you t ● ll ● ha ● was donne, whē you were all asleepe? |
A09106 | Common sense( saith he) might haue replied( to the souldiers) what could you tell what was donne, when you were all asleep? |
A09106 | Could it be errour of print? |
A09106 | Could that errour be by errour of print, diuersity of translation, or difference of editions? |
A09106 | Dallers of Germany, or English Angels? |
A09106 | Did our Sauiour make Pilate his competent Iudge, by swearing to him by God? |
A09106 | Diuersities of translation& c? |
A09106 | Do English Ministers take vpon them these labours? |
A09106 | Do not these thing ● simbolize with the life of Iesus? |
A09106 | Do thou( Reader) consider whether the wordes of Origen may be interpreted of the fire of the last cōflagration or ● ot? |
A09106 | Do you not see, that still the poore man runneth quite from the purpose, and hath nothing to say to the effect he should say? |
A09106 | Do you see this mans heat? |
A09106 | Do you see where the man is againe? |
A09106 | Do you see, what a kind of proofe he bringeth? |
A09106 | Do yow see how confidently he writeth? |
A09106 | Doe you respect what you vt ● ● ●? |
A09106 | Doth he obserue this? |
A09106 | Doth not euery one of these examples conuince him of wilfull fraud? |
A09106 | Doth the man( who maketh mention of his interruption by sicknesse) know what he hath now said? |
A09106 | Doth this become a Minister o ● simple truth? |
A09106 | Doth this man know, or care, what he saith? |
A09106 | Doth this take away the doctrine it self? |
A09106 | Ethelswith was a law, or according to the cōmon law in those dayes? |
A09106 | For albeit the wordes of S. Peter in the text of the Actes of the Apostles be, Tell me, woman, if you sould the ● eild for so much? |
A09106 | For if vpon this cause she were excommunicated, what part had Catholicks therin? |
A09106 | For to the first this only he answereth: What haue I reported from Polidore? |
A09106 | For to what end or profit should P. R. erre willingly in a matter that importeth him and his cause so little? |
A09106 | For what can it impor ● either to be shauen or be long- bearded, to vse collusion in treating of a cause? |
A09106 | For what knoweth he what God may inspire his Maiesty in succeeding yeares? |
A09106 | French Crownes? |
A09106 | From whence is this tradition( of not rebaptizing heretickes?) |
A09106 | Goodman also, Gilby, VVhittingham, Knox, Buchanan, and others neerer home vnto vs? |
A09106 | Gratious and meeke Lady what hath she euer done? |
A09106 | Had not this bene probable in such a case to mans discourse? |
A09106 | Hath Sayer any such word or sentence? |
A09106 | Hath he any shadow of excuse by ignorance of the Author and place? |
A09106 | Hath he cleered himselfe of falshood? |
A09106 | Haue you seene any demonstration alleadged by him for it, besides his ● nly imagination, and fond ● upposition? |
A09106 | How can he proue it? |
A09106 | How did he discouer his escapes therin, as here he professeth? |
A09106 | How doth he giue me speciall e thanks for pardoning him in one of his escapes, and for ascribing it to that he had not seene the Author himself? |
A09106 | How impertmently is this Grammaticall phrase applyed by Syr Edward? |
A09106 | How many periods be there heere false of his? |
A09106 | How must it be executed? |
A09106 | How then are these two first pointes answered of falsifying a decree, and peruerting the Glos ● e? |
A09106 | How then bl ● sh you not to deny this? |
A09106 | How then can this be excused without some shift of Equiuocall meaning in this false Minister, saying one thing,& meaning another? |
A09106 | How then doth M. Morton answere to the purpose? |
A09106 | How then doth the Iustice trifle so in this matter? |
A09106 | How then is M. Morton so sufficiently furnished to con ● ound vs with true and playne confessed testimonyes? |
A09106 | How then is it heere againe brought in against me in this ninth obiection of ● alsity? |
A09106 | How then is this to the purpose? |
A09106 | How was it made? |
A09106 | How will this soūd in the eares of all forraine Monarches, and greatest Potentates that are touched therby? |
A09106 | I haue alleaged the later, and P. R. hath opposed the former, both of vs haue affirmed a truth, where then is the falshood? |
A09106 | If by errour he missed in the citation, why happened it vpon those things that were all to his aduantage? |
A09106 | If he do not: But when? |
A09106 | If then that Virgin that was capable of God, must come into the seuerity of Gods iudgment, who will dare to desyre to be iudg ● d by God? |
A09106 | If you say( quoth he) that they differ, then must the difference be eyther in respect of the speakers, or of the hearers? |
A09106 | Ignorance? |
A09106 | Ignorance? |
A09106 | Ignorance? |
A09106 | Is he found false in any one thing which heere is said? |
A09106 | Is he helped by dif ● erence of translations or editions? |
A09106 | Is it because Otto Frisingensis is cyted cōtrary to his meaning? |
A09106 | Is it deriued from our Lords Authority? |
A09106 | Is it not playne that Morton ● elleth ● elleth wynd, and wordes, and vaunts for workes? |
A09106 | Is it not wilfull? |
A09106 | Is it possible that my aduersary can free himself from a falsity corroding the conscience? |
A09106 | Is not one only of these tricks sufficient to des ● rie,& discredit his bad conscience in wryting? |
A09106 | Is not the hart of kings in the hands of God? |
A09106 | Is not this M. Mortons plaine meaning( thinke you) as both his words and drift do shew? |
A09106 | Is not this a good syllogisme? |
A09106 | Is not this a strange direct and demonstratiue proofe, to proue one thing by another? |
A09106 | Is not this exc ● ssiue ouerlashing against others, and ouerweening in himselfe? |
A09106 | Is not this singular falshood? |
A09106 | Is not this wilfull and malicious fraud? |
A09106 | Is one example of similitude sufficient to proue this? |
A09106 | Is there any man that will admit so violēt a fact as this? |
A09106 | Is there any man( I say) so simple or sottish, as not to see the impertinency of this manner of proceeding? |
A09106 | Is there any such ● hing in this verse? |
A09106 | Is this Manhood? |
A09106 | Is this for a man that so much abhorreth Equiuocation? |
A09106 | Is this good dealing? |
A09106 | Is this good dealing? |
A09106 | Is this intemperate speach befitting a Iudges person? |
A09106 | Is this opposit to Iesus or no? |
A09106 | Is this sincere? |
A09106 | Is this sincerity? |
A09106 | Is this sound Diuinity? |
A09106 | Is this the assurance of his vpright conscience, wherof he braggeth to his Maiestie? |
A09106 | Is this to be cōpared to the actions of Diuels? |
A09106 | Is this tollerable in a Minister of simple truth, who vaunteth to his Maiesty of the constant assurance of his vpright conscience? |
A09106 | Is this true? |
A09106 | It is deriued from the Lords Authority, or fr ● m the pr ● c ● pt of the Apostles? |
A09106 | It may be, some do but doubtingly defend it, what will yow iudge of these? |
A09106 | M. Fox in like maner, was he not of your profession? |
A09106 | M. Horne also, was he not of your profession? |
A09106 | May not all lawes of the Frenchmen be ascribed by this meanes vnto the Brittans? |
A09106 | May not euery man then( to vse his owne words) vnderstanding English presētly discerne the same? |
A09106 | May not the different lawes of diuers countries agree in some one case or other, without this inference, that therefore they are the same lawes? |
A09106 | Morton against it? |
A09106 | Morton to be so simple both in Grāmar, Law,& Deuinitie, as that he doth not know what difference there is betweene contumax and pertinax? |
A09106 | Morton? |
A09106 | Nay can the cōmon cōuersatiō of humane life be without it, where lying is auoyded? |
A09106 | Nay is it not rather babish Childhood, that semeth not to know the very first elements of true Diuinity? |
A09106 | Nay is not M. Morton cōuinced of euident fraud in setting downe this accusation? |
A09106 | Nay, where 〈 ◊ 〉 this man P. R. himselfe, the new select Aduocate ● or this cause? |
A09106 | Negligence? |
A09106 | Negligence? |
A09106 | Negligence? |
A09106 | Now then I would aske M. Morton whether he ● ad considered this or no, when he doth so reuell ● gains ● me with his rurall boy? |
A09106 | Now then what hath all this to do with Contumax haereticus tā praesumptus quàm mani ● estus? |
A09106 | Of whom and what causes must inquiry be made? |
A09106 | Or at leastwise mētioned the same in this his last Reply? |
A09106 | Or by his owne Doctors? |
A09106 | Or can any man excuse him from falshood and malice in this open treachery? |
A09106 | Or can ye meruayle, why I tooke this tytle of A quiet and sober Reckoning? |
A09106 | Or do Englsh Ministers trouble themselues much with such matters? |
A09106 | Or doe not the same things remayne in Holinshed, Hooker, Harrison, Thyn, and other wryters, aswell English as Scottish? |
A09106 | Or doe you not thinke that other m ● n will c ● n ● ● ● ● r what you speake, and vpon what groundes? |
A09106 | Or doth all this prooue that this was not their doctrine? |
A09106 | Or doth it prooue that these first ghospellers held it not? |
A09106 | Or doth not this also prooue him to be one of those forenamed Doctors that vnderstand not what they say, or wherof they affirme? |
A09106 | Or doth this proue that those Catholike Realmes do not acknowledge the Popes Ecclesiasticall Supremacy? |
A09106 | Or his subiectes contentment? |
A09106 | Or is Iohn Fox become of so little credit now with M. Mor ● ō, as to be shaken of so slieghtly, as heere he is? |
A09106 | Or is it not singular folly to call it by that name? |
A09106 | Or is it rather true, that you cut him of, and would suffer him to say no further? |
A09106 | Or is not Iohn Foxes credit in history as good, as that of Holinshed, especially when he affirmeth,& the other saith nothing? |
A09106 | Or is there any man so light& foolish, eyther Protesta ● t or Catholick, as will giue credit to so fond an assertion? |
A09106 | Or is there any one of these points, that prooueth any least falshood in me,& not rather all foure in him? |
A09106 | Or is your profession to speake, ● ● u care not what? |
A09106 | Or reason why this so ● otoriou ● a ly of M. Morton may not be condemned for willfull? |
A09106 | Or that he foūd so vniust a Iudge as would giue such a sentence so contrary to all conscience, sense, and reason? |
A09106 | Or were he a man tractable or conuersable in a common- wealth? |
A09106 | Or what reason can he alleadge for it? |
A09106 | Or what substance hath he, or may be presumed to haue for making this payment? |
A09106 | Or when do you thinke will he be able to answere this matter? |
A09106 | Or wherin may this be like to my cause? |
A09106 | Or who would suppose or inferre this but M. Morton? |
A09106 | Or why do you delude your Reader so? |
A09106 | Or why do yow corrupt your Author so? |
A09106 | Or why had not M. Morton so much as mentioned this condemnation by Bellarmine, seing it imported the matter so mightely? |
A09106 | Or will M. Attorney call this a Nihil dicit, whē the cause shall come before him in seat of Iudgment? |
A09106 | Or will Syr Edward Cooke be so vnreasonable in this behalf, as to request any man to belieue him that such a Iudgment was giuē for him? |
A09106 | Ouersight? |
A09106 | Ouersight? |
A09106 | Out of what conscience may it proceed? |
A09106 | Portugall Cruzadoes? |
A09106 | Secondly, there is willfull deceipt in leauing out the first wordes of the Author, Sed quòd dices, si iuraui? |
A09106 | Shall he be credited hereafter? |
A09106 | Tell me, brother, of what Priest was it euer heard, that he attempted a fact like vnto this of yours? |
A09106 | That I noted him to haue vsed and vrged Verè for Verò out of Carerius contrarie to the edition which I had of that booke? |
A09106 | That Popes can not be hereticks or be deposed for the same? |
A09106 | The ● oman is asked( saith he) sould you the land for so much? |
A09106 | These things, I say, do easely answere the flattering Ministers demand of, Gratious meeke Lady, what hath she euer done? |
A09106 | This is his Encomium: But what doth he giue? |
A09106 | This is the narration; what hath now Thomas Morton to say against vs? |
A09106 | This other is a new matter and from the purpose: whether there be other Authors that speake and write euill of Pope Gregory or no? |
A09106 | Thus farre this Charter, but now I would demaund what Syr Edward meaneth to proue heerby? |
A09106 | Thus goeth that Colloquy: and can any thing be set downe more in ● ulsely in so graue a matter, as we haue in hand? |
A09106 | To whom? |
A09106 | VVas it by chance or of purpose? |
A09106 | VVas it negligence, or ignorance? |
A09106 | VVas not this cra ● tie perfidious dealing? |
A09106 | VVe haue heard of their opinion, haue you any thing to except against their practise? |
A09106 | VVere not this a substantiall kind of arguing ou ● of the figure Synecdoche, which is Pars pro toto, a part for the whole? |
A09106 | VVhat excuse may be admitted in ● his place? |
A09106 | VVhat excuse( saith he) may P. R. now vse to free himsel ● e from falshood? |
A09106 | VVhat haue we to doe with thee ô Iesu? |
A09106 | VVhat meaneth, I say, M. Morton to de ● le so vnsincerely in such sort as euery child may see his fraud? |
A09106 | VVhat now? |
A09106 | VVhat therfore? |
A09106 | VVhere are they? |
A09106 | VVhere dwell they? |
A09106 | VVhere is( say you) his appeale vnto both Vniuersities? |
A09106 | VVhere is( say you) his challeng of Canoni ● ● s, and Schoole- Deuines? |
A09106 | VVherto I answere, that this is not the point in question, wh ● ther Lambertus did thinke, that they had excōm ● nicated him or no? |
A09106 | VVhich way will M. Morton turne himself heere? |
A09106 | VVho would reason so, or who would go about so to abuse his Reader, and himselfe, that had care of conscience or credit? |
A09106 | VVhy did he alter them? |
A09106 | VVhy did he not bring them forth with the rest? |
A09106 | VVhy had not he( if he had meant playnly and sincerely) set downe Bellarmines wordes as he found them in his text? |
A09106 | VVill you say( saith he) that it is an errour of Ignorance, ouersight, negligence? |
A09106 | Vpon what occasion? |
A09106 | WHETHER the Catholicke Deuine might be iustly condemned of a Nihil dicit, or no? |
A09106 | Was his store house so barren, that he had but one only example to bring forth, and that so farre fecht as from Cesar by a leap to our time? |
A09106 | Was it a vengeance of God to dye peaceably in his bed, through the feruour of holy desires to see the holy Land recouered? |
A09106 | Was it with the faces of Hierusalē and Iuda, or not rather of Sodome and Gomorrah? |
A09106 | Was not hanging for theft in vse also among the Brittans, Romans, and Grecians? |
A09106 | Was not this as necessary a subiect to be handled as to put himself to discusse the wit, memory, skill, and other qualities of his Aduersary? |
A09106 | Was there euer any English Iudge before the Apostacy of Martyn Luther, that gaue a Charge from the bench against such men, for being such? |
A09106 | Was this a change of lawes or no? |
A09106 | Was this diligence? |
A09106 | Was this iealousy of his owne infirmity? |
A09106 | Was this only ad ● aciendum populum, to hunt after popular applause? |
A09106 | Was this out of the infirmity of the flesh and pusillanimity, or rather out of couetousnes and iniquity? |
A09106 | We may say with Horace, Quid dignum tanto feret hic promissor hiatu? |
A09106 | Well then what was Costerus his meaning? |
A09106 | Were not his victorie the lesse in ouercōming so weake an aduersarie? |
A09106 | Were not the partie to be cast out as a tumultuous make- bate? |
A09106 | Were not their Cerimonies and Sacrifices a figure of our Sacramēts& Sacrifice? |
A09106 | Were not these things to be fulfilled aswell vpon earth as in heauen? |
A09106 | What answereth M. Morton? |
A09106 | What became of the other bookes of Knox? |
A09106 | What coherence hath this togeather? |
A09106 | What cuasion would they find to free themselues from these inconueniences? |
A09106 | What day will he appoint? |
A09106 | What dealing, what conscience, what truth is this? |
A09106 | What did it cōteyne? |
A09106 | What doth he now answere for the discharge of this imputation? |
A09106 | What extreme impudencie is this in a Myni ● ter? |
A09106 | What falshood is this then to alleadge Authors thus directly against their owne sense, meaning, and whole drift? |
A09106 | What haue you conuinced against me? |
A09106 | What haue you proued? |
A09106 | What haue you to say against them in this kind out of this place? |
A09106 | What obstinate? |
A09106 | What part of the naile do they hit? |
A09106 | What profit might my cause gaine therby? |
A09106 | What say you then of the precedent foure? |
A09106 | What shameles dealing then is this of our Mynister to charge Genesius with such folly or impiety which he neuer thought of? |
A09106 | What strang effect will so great words bring forth? |
A09106 | What then will you say of this ● ellow, and his manner of writing? |
A09106 | What time will he take? |
A09106 | What trick is this? |
A09106 | What wilfull falshood was there in me to note the error, which I found in my edition? |
A09106 | What will Syr Edward answere here for his Nihil dicit? |
A09106 | What will Syr Edward say to this? |
A09106 | What will you say? |
A09106 | What will yow say to this? |
A09106 | What would the say? |
A09106 | When lyued they? |
A09106 | When was it euer seene that the iudgment of the Church did take authority from the Emperour? |
A09106 | Where is his Chal ● enge of Canonists and School- deuines? |
A09106 | Where is ● ● s apeale vnto both our Vniuersities? |
A09106 | Where then remayneth the Charge of Perfidiae Reus? |
A09106 | Where was his Memorie, when he wrote this to impugne my Memorie? |
A09106 | Where was his Memorie, when he wrote this? |
A09106 | Where? |
A09106 | Wherefore hath Sathan tempted thy hart to ly vnto the Holy ghost? |
A09106 | Wherin then standeth this wilfull malice of mine? |
A09106 | Wherto the Reader may answere for me, that it is set downe in latin aboue twenty times: What excuse can he pretēd? |
A09106 | Whet ● er he spake this being in his feauer- fit, or in temper? |
A09106 | Whether in a dreame or a wake? |
A09106 | Whether in his right mynd, or in distraction? |
A09106 | Who then shall ryse in iudgement against T. Morton for all this wilfull lying? |
A09106 | Who would wrangle thus but M. Morton for lacke of better matter? |
A09106 | Why do they not change their opinions, and become Protestants? |
A09106 | Why had he not alleaged some one example or proofe before the Conquest as the Case and question required? |
A09106 | Why had he not answered to these things in this his last Reply,& opened his Apothecaries box which now he promiseth? |
A09106 | Why had he not giuen some satisfaction? |
A09106 | Why had not M. Morton put downe that referēce in his English text which most imported? |
A09106 | Why had not he alleaged the whole place out of Caesar as I haue done? |
A09106 | Why say you nothing of them? |
A09106 | Why then did he suppresse all the precedent clauses that do declare Costerus his purpose? |
A09106 | Will Sepulueda deny all those Fathers, alleadged by me before for our interpretatiō, to be Fathers? |
A09106 | Will any man belieue him, that this is conforme to any ancient law of England? |
A09106 | Will he recall his temerarious assertion? |
A09106 | Will he remember now his former saying, that Ignorance and bouldnes do commonly concurre? |
A09106 | Will he say it is lawfull to exclude him? |
A09106 | Will he say, that their exposition is cōtrary to all common sense? |
A09106 | Will he thinke it lawfull to admitt him, notwithstanding the diuersity of his religion? |
A09106 | Will not M. Morton be ashamed of this shift, and blush at the consequence? |
A09106 | Would not you thinke that he meant that we had none at all to obiect, no more against their practises then their doctrine? |
A09106 | Yea this intollerable impudency or impotency of malice, to vse his owne words? |
A09106 | Yea( Sir) and will you escape so? |
A09106 | You do accuse them that they haue diuers,& different expositions vpon the said Canon of the Councell of Eliberis? |
A09106 | Zechines of Venice? |
A09106 | against Pope Hildebrand, who is by them most highly commended? |
A09106 | all Protestants teach positions rebellious? |
A09106 | alleadge ● saith ● saith he) editions, translations, prints? |
A09106 | and all the Fathers expositions violented against their owne iudgement? |
A09106 | and doth not he cite sundry other places out of these very same authors which Syxtus Senensis hath not censured? |
A09106 | and haue not you found in D. Stapletons Counterblast 690. vntruthes, as in my booke also I noted vnto you? |
A09106 | and haue you not read him? |
A09106 | and if this be not any contradiction, as any child will confesse that it is not, why doth he seeke to abuse his Reader with such a fallacy? |
A09106 | and may do thrice as many more of those that ensued the other, if we would stand vpon it? |
A09106 | and may not a man aswell alleage S. Luke against S. Paul as Binius against this Pope in this cause? |
A09106 | and sincerly haue told his Reader that he did only relate the matter with this clause( vt fertur) as it is said? |
A09106 | and that in print? |
A09106 | and thirdly went about to deceiue his Reader by his false English translation? |
A09106 | any more in any thing that he alleageth, when this cōscienceles falsification is once discouered in him? |
A09106 | as namely in his Lords Court of the Arches? |
A09106 | but let him answere directly and substantially to this demaund? |
A09106 | by what law, Diuine or humane they are exempted? |
A09106 | calling this my curtesy a dram ● of sugar? |
A09106 | can this be defended from wilfull falshood knowne to the speaker? |
A09106 | can this be excused? |
A09106 | can this be thought tolerable? |
A09106 | cōceale this? |
A09106 | decketh his body with the best apparrell he can get? |
A09106 | demaunding the reason, how they could sweare or rather softweare in such manner, the thing being knowne to be so notoriously false? |
A09106 | did he not see& know that he fa ● sifyed manifestly the text of Bellarmine? |
A09106 | did hold himselfe very free from this perfidiousnes, who obiecteth the same so freely against vs? |
A09106 | doth Maldonate say any thing in this sentence that is not conforme to our Common doctrine of Equiuocation? |
A09106 | doth he thinke of what he writeth? |
A09106 | doth he thinke that only his Aduersary the moderate Answerer is such a deceaued Priest, as S. Paul pointeth at, or noe? |
A09106 | doth not Genesius himselfe in the very Chapter here cited alleage both S. Hierome and S. Augustine for this interpretation, and alloweth the same? |
A09106 | doth not S. Paul in the 9. an 10. of his first Epistle to the Corinthians set downe many examples to this effect? |
A09106 | doth not one affirmatiue witnesse constantly auouching any thing, prooue more then ten that hold their peace,& say nothing? |
A09106 | doth not this hit the nayle on the head also against M. Morton? |
A09106 | doth one particuler instance or action make a law, or proue a law with Syr Edward? |
A09106 | doth this serue to M. Mortons purpose for disgracing of Pope Gregory by Binius his testimony? |
A09106 | especially they being so few? |
A09106 | euen th ● rfore to ● eeke to preuent ensuing dangers, because they are contingent, and may be hera ● ter? |
A09106 | fareth delicatly? |
A09106 | fasteth seldome or neuer? |
A09106 | flattereth, raileth, lieth in this his Sermō against Catholicks, without all respect of truth, ciuility, or honesty? |
A09106 | for the falsification of M. Reinolds testimony: may this be called an exact reuiew of his owne works? |
A09106 | had this bene against common sense to haue alledged this excuse? |
A09106 | his officers) and how he could presume to haue more care of his owne credit, then of the others that is his head and Chiefteyne? |
A09106 | if the last only stricke the head? |
A09106 | is this repugnant to common sense and reason, as M. Morton affirmeth? |
A09106 | matter to the purpose or impertinent? |
A09106 | may he not say heerafter, I was a ● amed, and therefore I hid my selfe? |
A09106 | may he not say hera ● ter, I was ashamed, and hid my selfe? |
A09106 | may not there be in the selfe same sermon different sentences, and different senses vpon different occasions, and to different purposes? |
A09106 | on the head directly, insteed of the nayle,& most manifestly in the first, second and third Rules,& by all the different Cases therin resolued? |
A09106 | oposite also to Iesus himselfe, and conforme to those of Diuels, whome he bringeth in saying, quid nobis& tibi est Iesu? |
A09106 | or by sensible reasons? |
A09106 | or by what consequence of reason this commeth about? |
A09106 | or can this be condemned for a Nihil di ● it? |
A09106 | or fit to mānage any matter of importance, though otherwise neuer so learned, neuer so prudent, neuer so good, neuer so godly? |
A09106 | or is not this an assertion fit for one of those doctours, wherof S. Paul talketh, that vnderstand not what they say, or wherof they affirme? |
A09106 | or is not ● his equiuocating in the worst sense? |
A09106 | or what will you do with such men? |
A09106 | pampreth his flesh? |
A09106 | pestreth the Colledg ● with his brattes, which the founder neuer thought of? |
A09106 | print? |
A09106 | pursueth all wayes and meanes of ambition? |
A09106 | shall it be edition? |
A09106 | sincere or wrested allegatiōs? |
A09106 | sleepeth his fill? |
A09106 | the second, VVhether he may be thought to be a sufficient Proctor in this case or no? |
A09106 | the third, VVhether he hath suffici ● ncy to performe his taske? |
A09106 | their Circumcisions and washings figures of our Baptisme? |
A09106 | their Manna of our Eucharist? |
A09106 | to witt, that he will keepe the clause of Reseruation vnder a Latin lock, and that he neuer meant to locke it vp? |
A09106 | translatiō? |
A09106 | truth or falshood? |
A09106 | was it not a ● igure also of many things vpō earth, which should be fulfilled in the new Testament? |
A09106 | what exact& diligent cēsure did he vse in this reuiew? |
A09106 | what interest could I haue by it? |
A09106 | where now is that Iudge that gaue sentence ● or him in this behalfe, will he come forth& stand to his sentence? |
A09106 | wherof the one is a fault in obedience towards our Superiours, as now hath byn shewed, the other of tenacity of opinion, as before we haue declared? |
A09106 | whether his ● uckler or shield were sound? |
A09106 | who sayth so? |
A09106 | who will say so, that is indued with common sense? |
A09106 | whose finger did she euer cause to ake, and her hart aked not with him? |
A09106 | why had he not alleaged some examples of the continued vse and practise of the same throughout the raignes of the subsequent Kings, and Nations? |
A09106 | why then doth your Authour Frisingensis say that he fyndeth none excommunicated or depryued of his kingdome before Henry the 4. by Gregoy the 7? |
A09106 | wil he still cōtinue of forge new lyes against the Authors expresse wordes and meaning? |
A09106 | will M. Morton say that he saw not Costerus his meaning, or that he had not a ● alse meaning himselfe to deceaue his Reader? |
A09106 | will the Protestants receaue him or no? |
A09106 | will you haue it in Spanish Pistolets? |
A09106 | yea Prince of the Church? |
A09106 | yea a Chiefe Iudge? |
A09106 | yea and an impossibilitie of the contrarie, that they can be obedient? |
A09106 | ● Vhat are their names? |
A09106 | ● hat lacke of charitie can he find heerin? |
A09106 | ● hy had you not alleadged one at least? |
A09106 | ● s not this absurd and impious? |