Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
14661Is it not demonstrated that Utah is an abnormal State?
14661Is there menace in this system?
14661What shall the Americans of that Commonwealth do if the people of the United States do not heed their cry?
14661Will Congress allow this awful calamity to continue?
45006And if we look to the conditions of individuals, what a proud spectacle does it exhibit?
45006Then why?
45006[ On whom has oppression fallen in any quarter of the Union?]
45006who has been deprived of any right of person or property?
45006who restrained from offering his vows in the mode which he prefers to the Divine author of his being?
42331[ 19]--Turn ye, turn ye, then at his reproof, for why will ye die?"
42331And can the Christian refuse the command of Him who has done, and continues to do, such great things for him?
42331And now, brethren, have I made the duty enjoined in the text plain to you?
42331And who, on the other hand, can describe the horrors of a turbulent and disordered state of society?
42331Are there then any here, who are dissatisfied with the government they live under?
42331Are we then to offer no resistance to them?
42331Can your hands be strong, or your hearts endure in the day when he shall deal with you?
42331Did they offer any resistance"to the king as supreme?"
42331Is their character and conduct to make no difference in the submission due to them?
42331Must not the love he bears his Saviour constrain him to comply with his precepts?
42331Well, therefore, may it be said to us,"Submit yourselves,"& c. But it may perhaps be asked,_ what is it to submit rightly_ to every ordinance of man?
42331Who can estimate the present blessing of a quiet and well ordered government?
42331have I shown you in a scriptural manner its nature and extent, and the motive which is to actuate the Christian in the discharge of it?
31670And is there any one fact, which the progress of events is now making, more manifest than the oneness of all mankind?
31670But though we will not meddle with public affairs, who shall answer for it that public affairs will not meddle with us?
31670How can it be otherwise?
31670Who can help having his attention arrested and engrossed?
31670Who shall define the circle and the sphere of the private individual?
31670Who would not rather suffer with the Right than prosper with the Wrong?
31670what heart, hitherto cold, will not consecrate itself to the work of its abolition?
31670what if I am political?
31670what if every pulpit in the land should be ringing in these days with political events?
39622Are Catholics willing to do that?
39622Are there two kinds of Catholics?
39622But what will happen to the lamb?
39622But will she do it?
39622Could not, therefore, Napoleon come to Rome to be crowned in St. Peter''s cathedral?
39622Did he mean Rome, by"a foreign power?"
39622Did these statesmen speak the truth?
39622How can such a state make laws for Christians?
39622How did the clergy receive him?
39622How was the president going to persuade the French to make war upon a sister republic?
39622If the church submits to the state, it ceases to be divine, for how can a divine institution be subject to a man- made state?
39622Is the Church of Rome divided?
39622Is there any reason why they should hesitate to sacrifice America, if need be, to the"Glory of God,"if they did not hesitate to sacrifice France?
39622No?
39622We ask once more, are Catholics willing to do that?
39622Were they not sincere when they published in the papers that there were not in all France more loyal republicans than the Catholics?
39622What can a country do without the church?
39622What can the church do for a people?
39622What did they say to this betrayer of the nation, this traitor, who had violated his solemn oath?
39622What made Louis Napoleon a favorite with the church?
39622What today is the difference between Austria, for instance, and America?
39622When we have God for a teacher, or his vicar on earth to rule us, what would liberty be good for?
39622Why may a cardinal stand up for his church, and not I for the secular state?
39622Why?
39622Why?
39622Yes?
39622Yet if she had the power to make an Austria out of America would she hesitate to do it?
39622_ Question:_ Are there not special reasons why we are most profoundly indebted to Napoleon the First, our emperor?
39622_ Question:_ What shall be thought of those who fail in their respect to our emperor?
37302And pray resolve me, why must this false Title be set up as''twere by the King''s Consent, to worm out the only true one?
37302And those who own the King''s Right upon the Consent of the People, be still labouring under the Church''s highest displeasure?
37302And was it not possible that the E. of_ N._ might oblige his old Friends in the same manner?
37302And what is holy Inquisition, but a perpetual Series of Murthers carry''d on in barbarous Forms of Law against the common Sense of Mankind?
37302Any Cruelties so savage as those of the Holy Inquisition?
37302Any Murthers so solemn, and religiously brutal as the Acts of Faith?
37302Any Pragmaticalness so insufferable as that of the Jesuits?
37302But he asked me to what end could an unintelligible Doctrine be revealed?
37302But what greater slavery than to force on Men a Belief of such things as necessary to Salvation, of which''tis not possible to form any Idea?
37302Does History account for any Barbarities so great as those committed by the Popes?
37302For what honest Christian can oppose a Rightful King in regaining the Possession of his Throne, which is kept from him by a Successful Usurper?
37302H._ lately write a Treatise, wherein with great Learning and accurate Judgment he distinguished betwixt Religion and Priest- craft?
37302Nay, were not the Doctrines of_ Loyalty to the King_, insisted upon more than_ Faith in Christ_?
37302Suppose a Man should govern himself by the Law of_ Christ_, and go no further, is there any Christian Church which would own such an one for a Member?
37302That which is only above Reason must be above a rational Belief, and must I be Saved by an irrational Belief?
37302To what end have so many Persecutions and Penal Laws been set a foot by the Clergy in Christendom?
37302What Figure will this Grand Monarch make in Story?
37302What an unhappy Effect had the Spirit of Father_ Laud_ upon King_ Charles_ the First?
37302What can be the effect of an unintelligible_ Mystery_ upon our Minds, but only Amusement?
37302What was it but the Insolence of the Priesthood that brought about Father_ Laud_''s and Father_ Peter_''s Revolutions?
37302Why must none be preferr''d to Church- Dignities, but such who come in upon this Title only?
37302is not their Humanity extinguished by their Christian Religion?
37302or only to bring them to that short Article of their Clergy Religion,_ i.e._ to submit to their Power?
37302was it to bring Men to any one Point of that full Description of Christian Religion, which you cited from Sir_ Matthew Hale_?
33896[ 188] And therefore God said to David in his sin,What hast thou to do to declare my statutes?"
33896And John says of him, that, when Christ wished to wash his feet, Peter answered and said:"Lord, dost Thou wash my feet?"
33896And continuing His discourse with them, He came to this:"When I sent you, without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye anything?
33896And further, that she had it not from the consent of all, or even of the greater part of mankind, who can doubt?
33896And if it is so, is not God in the midst of them, for He Himself promises us this in the Gospel?
33896And if single combat can not fail to secure justice, is not what is gained in single combat gained as of right?
33896And thirdly, does the authority of Monarchy come from God directly, or only from some other minister or vicar of God?
33896But that in practice the Monarch is most disposed to work Justice, who can doubt, except indeed a man who understands not the meaning of the word?
33896E se l''infimo grado in sè raccoglie Sì grande lume, quant''è la larghezza Di questa rosa nell''estreme foglie?
33896First, there is the doubt and the question, is it necessary for the welfare of the world?
33896For what does it profit to labour, even in speaking truth, unless we start from a principle?
33896For what fruit can he be said to bear who should go about to demonstrate again some theorem of Euclid?
33896Has not Camillus left us a memorable example of obeying the laws instead of seeking our private advantage?
33896I.--"Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing?
33896Lastly, John tells that when Peter saw John, he said unto Jesus:"Lord, and what shall this man do?"
33896Lives he yet to breathe this air?
33896Matthew writes that when Jesus had asked His disciples:"Whom say ye that I am?"
33896PAGE I.--Introduction 177 II.--What is the end of the civil order of mankind?
33896Secondly, did the Roman people take to itself by right the office of Monarchy?
33896WHAT ARE THEY?
33896WHETHER A TEMPORAL MONARCHY IS NECESSARY FOR THE WELL- BEING OF THE WORLD?
33896WHETHER THE AUTHORITY OF THE MONARCH COMES DIRECTLY FROM GOD, OR FROM SOME VICAR OF GOD?
33896WHETHER THE ROMAN PEOPLE ASSUMED TO ITSELF BY RIGHT THE DIGNITY OF EMPIRE?
33896Was not Brutus the first to teach that our sons, that all others, are second in importance to the liberty of our country?
33896What shall we say to shepherds like these?
33896What shall we say when the substance of the Church is wasted, while the private estates of their own kindred are enlarged?
33896Who can fail to see the divine predestination shown forth by the double meeting of blood from every part of the world in the veins of one man?
33896Who then is so dull of understanding as not to see that this glorious people has won the crown of all the world, by the decision of combat?
33896Who will not marvel at thee here?
33896Why should we seek to reason with these, when they are led astray by their evil desires, and so can not see even our first principle?
33896[ 109][ Footnote 109: Chi crederebbe giù nel mondo errante, Che Rifèo Trojano[A] in questo tondo Fosse la quinta delle luci sante?
33896[ 180] But if this is so, who will say that human kind is not in its best state, when it can most use this principle?
33896[ 274] Therefore the Israelites said unto Moses:"Who made thee a judge over us?"
33896[ Footnote 254: Witte only gives a query(?).
33896or when Aristotle has shown us what happiness is, should show it to us once more?
33896or when Cicero has been the apologist of old age, should a second time undertake its defence?
38391But who is not a doctrinaire? 38391 Can the Church Aid Therein, and What is Her Duty?"
38391What are the Remedies at Her Disposal?
38391... in such case what will become of our protectorate over the Catholics of the East?
38391And yet, had it been otherwise, had we possessed such covered ways-- what then?
38391Are we going to permit Germany, Italy, and other nations to divide the debris, the remnants of our patrimony?"
38391Are you bound to accept as Gospel truth, every idea that rises in the minds of men?
38391Briand._--And what of that?
38391But does that mean that I ought to close my eyes to what is taking place today?
38391But, after all, does the fact of not recognizing the Organic Articles constitute a violation of the Concordat?
38391But, after all, what did Hegel and his disciples mean by religion?
38391Could we, without being false to our most cherished principles, affect sympathy with such a party?
38391Do the affairs of the Catholic world concern heretics and schismatics?
38391Does he suppose that the arms will fall from the hands of my soldiers?"
38391Does not the Emperor perceive that they are a menace to his throne?"
38391Had we not a right in view of what had occurred?
38391He had hardly seen me than, with inflamed countenance, and in a loud voice, he said:''So, Monsieur Cardinal, you wish to break the negotiations?
38391Hence, independently of the Concordat, is not such liberty of conscience demanded for all citizens by the Declaration of the Rights of Man?"
38391Here the speaker began to be interrupted, thus:_ Voices from the Left:_"What new spirit?"
38391If you ask me:''Do you believe that France in the relations of Church and State has arrived at definitive crisis?''
38391Is there anyone who does not profess some doctrine, either good or evil?
38391Is this not the time when instead of deriding ourselves further, we ought if possible to bring back union to our country?"
38391It is Republicans who make a republic, and who were these in Portugal?
38391Ketteler spoke eloquently upon the questions,"Does the Social Question Exist in Germany?"
38391Must you take every man as a Messiah who proclaims himself an apostle or a prophet?
38391Rene Boblet:_"Whom are you accusing of carrying on this exasperating war?"
38391Ribot._--"Never?
38391Some have tried to do this, and why?
38391Supposing this belief to be well- grounded, why should it make us criminals?
38391Two years before, in July, 1807, the Emperor had asked scornfully:"What does the Pope mean by the threat of excommunicating me?
38391What am I to say of our seminary fund, that, I mean, which is devoted to the education of young men in the society?
38391What consideration ought he to have for you, when you have had none for him?
38391What good reasons, political, historical or philosophical do you bring to support these theories?
38391What, then, about our methods of acquiring inheritances?
38391What, then, of the shots fired from our residence at Quelhas?
38391Why does the Court of Rome allow itself to be influenced by these non- Catholic powers?
38391Yet what else did we do?
38391You are preaching social and economical emancipation to the masses; but what obstacle has the workman from performing his labors freely?
38391You demand the restoration of the Legations?
38391You wish to be rid of the troops?
38391_ THE CHARGES AND THEIR ANSWERS._ It will naturally be asked, what were our crimes?
38391the great question began to be asked: How and where shall the Conclave be held?
13200But is there no hope in_ Israel_ concerning this thing? 13200 --So_ Job_ xxxiv, 17, 18:Shall even he that hateth right govern?--Is it fit to say to a king, Thou art wicked?
13200And is this such a blessing to the church, that an enemy to her Lord and Head rules over her?
13200And shall we thus harden ourselves against God and prosper?
13200And what can be the reason of this?
13200And what is all this but to pray for a nonentity, a mere creature of their own mind?
13200And what is the allegiance, but a promise to persevere in what they do daily, and what they hold as their indispensable duty to do?
13200Are these recorded in the Scriptures?
13200Are these works all written in the Bible?
13200Are they recorded in the Bible?
13200Are they to be found elsewhere but in_ uninspired history_?
13200But are men therefore obliged to acknowledge his authority, or submit to that providential power he maintains over them?
13200But how do they discover these footsteps, or how ascertain these attainments?
13200But how opposite this to the_ first_ article, obliging constantly to endeavor the preservation of the reformed religion?
13200But is he indeed deserving of such a character?
13200But is not this constitution according to the will, and by consent of, the body politic?
13200But was_ David_ therefore divested of his right and title?
13200But what mean these guarded terms and phrases,"merely;""churches?"
13200By what law could the opposite practices of those that disowned, and those that still continued to own the authority of unlawful rulers, be justified?
13200Can it be consistent therewith, to commit the government of the nations to a sworn enemy to the reformation?
13200Does he really merit such an encomium, who sacrilegiously usurps and wears the crown, that alone can flourish on the head of_ Zion''s_ king?
13200For example: in reference to"the first commandment with promise,"should the Christian minor be asked as the Jew did his Lord,"Who is your father?"
13200How easy is it here to turn their own artillery against themselves, and split their argument with a wedge of its own timber?
13200How shall he answer?
13200Is he warranted to appeal to God to manifest his earthly sonship?
13200Is not active obedience, is not professed subjection for conscience sake, an homologation of the constitution?
13200Is there no balm in_ Gilead_?
13200Is there not a physician there?"
13200Is there not virtue in Christ''s blood for the most desperate cases, that churches, as well as particular persons, can be in?
13200Is this charity or tyranny?"
13200Is this the nature and amount of your professed charity?
13200The Covenanter or Seceder replies by asking--"What iniquity have you or your fathers found in us, that you forsook our communion?"
13200What right have open idolaters and blasphemers to be protected and supported by any ordinance of God in the public acts of their idolatry?
13200With what face then can they pretend to have adopted a testimony for reformation principles, and to be of the same principles with our late reformers?
13200and is it not ordained by the providential will of God?
13200and to princes, Ye are ungodly?"
13200have the assemblies been prorogued, raised, and dissolved, by magistratical authority, and sometimes without nomination of another diet?
13200may not the Lord say?
13200no, not one that is able to judge between his brethren?"
13200xix, 2,_ Shouldst thou help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord?
37693Do any of these families,asks he,"know the questions which a priest puts to their families at the confessional?
37693The secular orders,says he?
37693And had these noble principles been available in supporting the pretension of the pope, would he have had the stupidity to denounce them?
37693Ant_, c. 47), St. Palladus, seeing a hyena standing near his cave, addressing it, asked:"What''s the matter?"
37693Are these sensational declamations?
37693Are they not sacerdotal brothels?
37693But after all what was the object of these institutions?
37693But does society exercise its authority in the matter any more visibly than deity?
37693But is not the contrary the fact?
37693But what is a religious organization?
37693But who is she that has the audacity to proclaim such principles?
37693But why are these dens exempted from the common law of the land?
37693Can the storm be averted?
37693Can they be regarded as citizens?
37693Did he not write against it, preach against if, and labor publicly and privately to arrest its progress?
37693Did not John Wesley, its founder and spirit, oppose the American revolution?
37693Did not all these facts occur in Home respecting Arnold of Brecia?
37693Did they not fight to defend it in the war of 1812?
37693Did they not fight to preserve its unity in the late rebellion?
37693Do husbands know the questions which priests put to their wives at the confession?....
37693Do they not deprive their inmates of personal liberty?
37693Do they not imprison them in dungeons?
37693Do they not inflict on them barbarous chastisements?
37693Do they not punish them?
37693Does not man and woman blush at their dishonored nature?
37693Does not the blood curdle in every vein at such recitals?
37693Does prejudice forbid it?
37693From nunneries governed and visited by priests of such a character, what is the logical inference?
37693Had Methodism been chosen as the basis of our government, would a republic have been thought of?
37693Had it been otherwise would he have denied their authority?
37693How many escaped nuns have unaccountably disappeared from society?
37693If the church shall ever gain in America the numerical strength for which she is striving, what will be the consequence to non- Catholics?
37693Is God a fiction, or divine retribution a dream?
37693Is it because they are too pious to violate the law of the land?
37693Is not reason the clearest guide to truth, conscience its most powerful advocate, investigation its most formidable ally?
37693It will be asked, Did not Catholics fight for the establishment of a free government in the revolutionary war?
37693Ought any man who holds to this position be admitted to-- or permitted to hold Christian citizenship under this government?
37693The signification of a corporate organization is well understood, but how shall we ascertain its principles and designs?
37693Was he not an aspiring and unscrupulous despot?
37693Was it to advance the capacities of individual man?
37693Was it to enlighten society at large?
37693Was there a man in England that inflicted deeper injury on the American cause?
37693Were he confident that his pretensions are founded in truth, would he have prohibited investigation''?
37693What infamous means have Catholic priests adopted to fill their nunneries?
37693What is it?
37693Which do you now chose?
37693Who are they that prate about chastity?
37693Who would, then, hesitate to sacrifice a prejudice that it may be effected?
37693Why are not the interior of monastic institutions constantly and thoroughly inspected, and the authority of the common law maintained over them?
37693Why are they allowed to bar their doors against the authority which all others must respect?
37693Why are they allowed to organize within a government an independent government, nullifying its jurisdiction over them?
37693Why do not grand juries, who visit other jails, penitentiaries, and asylums, inspect also the more secret and suspicious nunneries?
37693Why not?
37693Will she declare them legitimate, or respect their property titles?
37693Would England consent, it may be asked, to ally herself with the papal despot?
37693Would it not be that it claimed to be a political organization?
37693and that to utter such a question in its domains was to provoke its heaviest penalty?
37693that it was high treason in its estimation to question its right to this character?
40211How can we reason, but from what we know?
40211And what but the spirit of silence will conciliate the Quakers?
40211And would such be a Church of Christ?
40211Are not the ministers of that Church afraid of every new discovery in science?
40211But what is God?
40211Can any man reasonably say, that we have yet passed the superstitious state?
40211Can it be a Church of Christ?
40211Do we know what a Church of Christ is in reality?
40211First.--What is now the Church?
40211How can you furnish spirit and noise enough for the Unknown Tongues of the Irvingites?
40211I know you well enough to know, that you will not like its propounder; but who else has been ripe and bold enough to do it?
40211If I can sink the past in oblivion for common good, who should say he can not?
40211If Mr. Faraday had played you_ hocus pocus_ or legerdemain tricks, as a pretence of chemistry, would you have been satisfied?
40211If not, and I say-- No, to what good purpose does this expensive establishment exist?
40211In the Church now existing, is there aught but mystery that can be called its religion?
40211In what class of ages do we place the dark ages of man''s history?
40211Is it not so in Ireland?
40211Is it not your greatest trouble in this island?
40211Is it now so built?
40211Is not this the grand_ desideratum?_ Can it be accomplished?--I think it can, and so proceed to unfold the two- fold consideration.
40211It is a fair question to put to you and your party, if you know the first principles of the Institutions of this country?
40211Know you not, Sir, that knowledge is power?
40211Now what do we see?
40211On what rock, then, must the Church of Christ be built, so that the gates of hell, or of evil design, or of dissent, may not prevail against it?
40211On what, but KNOWLEDGE?
40211Or a beautifully reflected picture of the heavens and its explanation lessen true devotion?
40211Or what should it seek to be, other than a moral power?
40211Or, may it not be put to a better purpose?
40211The first consideration is-- What is now the Church?
40211The second consideration will be-- What ought the Church to be, so as to leave no ground and reason of dissent?
40211There would then be some ground for a bishop''s or overseer''s examination and confirmation; but what does confirmation now mean?
40211Those who dissent by knowledge, or those by ignorance?
40211To the Pagan, Jew, Mahometan, Infidel, or whose?
40211To which will you yield, or whom will you join?
40211To whose account are they placed?
40211Was not everything demonstrated, so that the words were verified by the acts of the Lecturer?
40211What are its defects?
40211What are its defects?
40211What does man know of God?
40211What is to be done to satisfy the Wesleyans or Methodists?
40211What is to be done with the Swedenborgians, the Muggletonians, and Southcotians?
40211What kind of a school?
40211What seeks your Church to be?
40211What the cause of that dissent which has made a revision necessary?
40211What the cause of that dissent, which has made a revision necessary?
40211What, then, is the revelation of the mystery of Christ?
40211What, then, ought the Church to be, so as to have no ground and reason of dissent?
40211When Peter, in the Gospel, is called upon to feed the lambs of Christ, what was meant?--to feed them with grass?
40211When there, were you asked to believe anything?
40211Who else deserves the honour of being its propounder; but I, its honest martyr and zealous student, through a ten years''imprisonment?
40211Will their pride let them learn of me?
40211Will you now grant that commission?
40211Would moral; science profane the pulpit or injure the congregation?
40211Would the experimental lectures of a Faraday, desecrate the building?
40211You may ask, how is this to be done?
40211You must have read that celebrated axiom of Bacon''s; but have you considered it, have you reflected, have you repented and proved that axiom?
40211and if it may, why not?
11771Could we commit mankind to a moral Deism without trembling for the result?
11771And does that free- will penetrate the universal frame invisibly to us, an omnipresent agent?
11771And if theological questions are to be dealt with, ought they not to be dealt with accurately, and not loosely?
11771And if this be so, has Christ failed?
11771And the real point is what proof has he given us that this is a revealed fact; that it is so, and that we have the means of knowing it?
11771And what is it that our Lord has done for man by being so truly man?
11771And what mighty mischief will result to countervail the application of this rule of justice?
11771And what was the proof of that doctrine, or essential to the proof of it?
11771And who is this St. Peter?
11771And why does this belief seem untenable to Mr. Maurice?
11771And why should this vast and far- reaching change be made?
11771And would a God who can not act be a God?
11771Are death and separation such light things to triumph over that imagination finds it easy to cheat them?
11771Are little manuals of falsified history confined only to one set of people?
11771Are our conclusions of the customary type?
11771Are they not of the customary, but of a strange and unknown type?
11771Are we likely to be more pained by their faults and deficiencies than he was?
11771But at the end of all such inquiries appears the question of questions, What was the beginning and root of it all?
11771But how to give to the meagre and narrow hearts of men such enlargement?
11771But in ordinary times would it not be well for her to confine herself to more modest and practicable undertakings?
11771But what good gift of God is not liable to abuse from men?
11771But what has taken place in the interim to produce this total change in our belief?
11771But what of all this?
11771But what other voice but his, of equal authority and weight, has been lifted up to speak the plain truth about them?
11771But why should he not?
11771But why?
11771But, first of all, what is that Christianity, and whence did it come, which Rome so helped?
11771Can the enthusiasm for the divinity of human nature stand the test of clear, unsparing observation?
11771Did not Christ do this?
11771Did the command to love go forth to those who had never seen a human being they could revere?
11771Did the statutes of the Reformation involve the abandonment of the duty of the Church to be the guardian of her faith?
11771Did, then, this event really take place?
11771Do they not?
11771Does Dr. Newman think that all Dr. Pusey felt he had to do was to conciliate Roman Catholics?
11771Does the bigness of the property entitle the State to claim it?
11771For if those witnesses and documents deceive us with regard to the miracles, how can we trust them with regard to the doctrines?
11771From the mere repetition do we know anything more about its cause?
11771Has not modern philosophy, again, shown both more strength and acuteness, and also more faith, than the ancient?
11771How did it get there?
11771How is it that the most mysterious of all truths is a universally accepted one?
11771How to make them capable of a universal sympathy?
11771If their account of visible facts is to be received with an explanation, is not their account of doctrines liable to a like explanation?
11771If they are wrong upon the evidences of a revelation, how can we depend upon their being right as to the nature of that revelation?
11771Indeed, does not our heart bear witness to the fact that to believe in a God is an exercise of faith?
11771Is he right in saying that he is not responsible as a Roman Catholic for the extravagances that Dr. Pusey dwells upon?
11771Is his faith secure if they are disproved?
11771Is it State property which the State may resume for other uses?
11771Is it near, or somewhat distant, or indefinitely remote?"
11771Is it that authority still reigns upon one question, and that the voice of all ages is too potent to be withstood?
11771Is it that they think it does not matter what a man believes, and whether a man turns Papist?
11771Is it unlawful for the Church to hold property?
11771Is it vexatious that the Church should be richer and more powerful than the sects?
11771Is not John Foxe still proof against the assaults of Dr. Maitland?
11771Is our standard higher than his?
11771Is the question of their truth or falsehood an irrelevant one to him?
11771Is there a contradiction in the idea of a personal Infinite Being?
11771Is there a contradiction in the idea of creation?
11771Is there above the level of material causes a region of Providence?
11771Is this an account of the world of fact or the world of romance?
11771It is most astonishing that it should have done so, what is the account of it?
11771It is plain that two great questions arise-- first, Are miracles possible?
11771It is pleasant to praise them for their real qualifications; but why do you rest on them as authorities?
11771It will be asked, Is the question to receive no judicial solution?
11771Look at it only as a conception, and does the wildest fiction of the imagination equal it?
11771Mere consciousness-- was not that of itself a new world within the old one?
11771Mere knowledge-- that nature herself became known to a being within herself, was not that the same?
11771Mr. Gladstone first goes into the question-- What was done, and what was the understanding at the Reformation?
11771No doubt it did; but what was it that responded, and what was its consolation, and whence was its power drawn?
11771Now by what means did he procure that these immense pretensions should be allowed?
11771Now, if this is not mere rhetoric, what does it come to?
11771Of these two influences-- that of Reason and that of Living Example-- which would a wise reformer reinforce?
11771Or is the evidence of it forestalled by the inductive principle compelling us to remove the scene_ as such_ out of the category of matters of fact?
11771Où est le sage qui a donné au monde autant de joie, que la possédée Marie de Magdala?
11771Shall surprise, then, give life to belief or stimulus to doubt?
11771Shall we speak of the originality of the design, of the skill displayed in the execution?
11771That possibly is sufficient for his purpose; but it may still be asked-- What did the Watson case itself grow out of?
11771The principle of authority is shaken, he tells us; what can he suggest to restore it?
11771Then what have we got besides the past repetition itself?
11771This being so, what would a man do who wished to study it methodically?
11771What can be more incomprehensible, more heterogeneous, a more ghostly resident in nature, than the sense of right and wrong?
11771What has produced this change, and elicited this new power of action?
11771What is it which guards this truth?
11771What is it which makes men shrink from denying it?
11771What is it?
11771What is the Gospel picture?
11771What is the argument urged in the Historical Introduction to justify or recommend our acquiescence in it?
11771What is the consequence?
11771What is the explanation of it?
11771What is the history of this?
11771What is there fascinating, or even imposing, in such a character?
11771What more entirely new and eccentric fact, indeed, can be imagined than a human soul first rising up amidst an animal and vegetable world?
11771What was there in the known thoughts or hopes or motives of men at the time to furnish such a response?
11771What, then, is the secret of its force?
11771What, then, is this investigation, and what course does it follow?
11771When it came to the question-- which every one must sooner or later put to himself on this subject-- Did these things really take place?
11771Whence is it?
11771Who can describe exhaustively the origin of civil society?
11771Who can describe that which unites men?
11771Who can dispute it?
11771Who has entered into the formation of speech which is the symbol of their union?
11771Who is the humble man?
11771Why is atheism a crime?
11771Why, if they are wrong, extravagant, dangerous, is his protest solitary?
11771Why, then, are we so certain of its_ future_ repetition?
11771Without infallibility, it is said, men will turn freethinkers and heretics; but do n''t they,_ with_ it?
11771Would a Deity deprived of miraculous action possess action at all?
11771Would he approve that word or disapprove it?"
11771Would it not be well for her to adapt her ends to her means?
11771Would it not be well for the Church to impose upon its ordinary members only ordinary duties?
11771Would it not issue in such an estimate of human nature as Mahomet took?
11771and what is the good of the engine if it will not do its work?
11771for our belief in the uniformity of nature?
11771must it come?
11771next, If they are, can any in fact be proved?
11771or can Christianity die?
11771ought it to come?