Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
A34907Do you Admire, why with Satyrick Rhyme, I Scourge the whifling Scoundrels of the Time?
A34907For why should I suspect the Breach of Bounds?
A34907Semper ego auditor tantum?
A34907Shall this then be th''effect of Gospel Light?
A34907To petrisy our Hearts and dim our Sight In Things of God?
A34907may I justly cry, Will Scotland nourish such Apostacy?
A29845A very wise observation, who ever question''d it?
A29845And therefore He that hath openly said so much already, what is it he wou''d not say, were it not for the Laws?
A29845And why?
A29845And why?
A29845And why?
A29845But here he pleads a Toleration, but for what?
A29845But how doth he endeavour to evade it?
A29845But how doth he go about this?
A29845But if we are not, and that this Man doth not make out what he so positively asserts, then what will he deserve?
A29845But this cuning man will ask, how can that which is inseparable from another be the ground of any assent in my mind?
A29845But what is all this to those who are not guilty of these things?
A29845But what is this to us?
A29845But why does he thus beat the Air?
A29845But why for the confirmation of a Doctrine?
A29845But why?
A29845How can a Man believe what he doth not know?
A29845How it was possible for them to touch so many millions of Objects at once?
A29845If they are so evident to our Senses or our Reason that we know them to be true, what necessity is there of farther conviction?
A29845Now at first sight who does not see?
A29845Now by this time who so blind as not to see?
A29845On this supposition, that a thing is in it''s own nature unconceivable, how is it possible for it to be reveal''d?
A29845To whom then will ye liken God?
A29845What is this but making a Syllogism, by applying the Medius Terminus to the parts of the Question?
A29845What need I instance in any more particulars?
A29845What trifling this is?
A29845When considered in the Informer, it is a ground of Perswasion; for why do I give my assent to any Proposition related to me from another?
A29845Whether the Angels did believe those things they are said to enquire into, or no?
A29845Who among us ever said there was?
A29845Who denies it?
A29845Who denies it?
A29845Who doubts it?
A29845With what Confidence can ye go about to give an exact Solution of Divine things?
A29845and how could we be said to have the Spirit of Wisdom?
A29845and indeed of Scripture it self?
A29845and to what purpose is all this, unless he thinks that his Readers have not learned Logick?
A29845or what likeness will ye compare unto him?
A29845suppose every thing in this Chapter true, what is all this to us?
A29845who ever deny''d it?
A29845why?
A29845wou''d not the immediate Objects of Sense and Reason have done as well, without farther reference to any thing beyond them?
A29845〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 How can the mind frame any Notion of thee, who art incomprehensible?
A62844* Quotidiè obsidemur, quotidiè prodimur; — Si semper ● … mus, quando proditum cst quodadmittimus?
A6284419. Who perceives not the Weakness and Slight of this Reasoning?
A62844And are not their other Errors since detected and exploded by most of the Learned?
A62844And does not all its Errors lie in attributing those Properties to a thing which it has not, or taking any away that it contains?
A62844And except Words easy to be understood be utter''d, how shall it be known what is spok ● …?
A62844And if a Figure be admitted in these Passages, why not, I pray, in all Expressions of the like Nature, when there appears an equal Necessity for it?
A62844And what hast thou that thou didst not receive?
A62844And what sets a Price upon Amber- greece, but the Perfume?
A62844And, in good earnest, to what sort of Assurance can any Man pretend, that he has made a right Version of what he openly professes not to conceive?
A62844Besides, it may be, he would ask whence the Church had Authority to decide this Matter?
A62844But I demand to what end should God require us to believe what we can not understand?
A62844But can Reason cast down or destroy it self?
A62844But how exercise our Diligence?
A62844But how shall we try?
A62844But how?
A62844But is this to be contrary to Reason?
A62844But of what?
A62844But shall any be damn''d for the Non- performance of Impossibilities?
A62844But what do they mean by consisting with themselves, yet not with our common Notions?
A62844But why should good Reasons be spent in Confutation of mere Fictions?
A62844But why should that deserve Blame in others, good Synesius, which you allow in your own Party?
A62844But with what better Reason could any be condemn''d for not believing what he said, if they might not understand it?
A62844But, pray, how so?
A62844Did Abraham blindly obey then, without reconciling the apparent Contradiction between God''s present Command and his former Promises?
A62844Dr. H''s Sermons, and Mr. C''s Discourses Waste- Paper?
A62844Have not these Men been quite baffl''d by as very Heathens as themselves?
A62844Have we not all the same sure and certain Promises of Light and Assistance from above, as well as the Privilege of Reason in common?
A62844How can any be sure that the Scripture contains all things necessary to Salvation, till he first reads it over?
A62844How could Believers be said to have the Spirit of Wisdom, and to have the Eyes of their Hearts enlightn''d?
A62844I''ll never believe it, let who will say the contrary; Lord, why do n''t you excommunicate the Author, and seize upon his Books?
A62844If it should be ask''d, why Assent is deny''d to true Propositions, since Evidence necessarily requires it?
A62844If thus we become stupid and unfit for earthly Speculations, how shall we believe when we are told of heavenly things?
A62844Immo à quibus prodi potuit?
A62844In how many places are we exhorted to beware of false Prophets and Teachers, Seducers and Deceivers?
A62844In what Sense pray?
A62844Is it possible for us to understand those Mysteries at last, or not?
A62844It was reckon''d no Crime not to believe in Christ before he was reveal''d; for how could they believe in him of whom they had not heard?
A62844Keep this Mystery then to him that rewardeth: and if any should say unto you, What harm is it, if I also learn?
A62844Magnaque Threïcio sacra reperta Samo?
A62844Nay, how can he conclude it to be Scripture, or the Word of God, till he exactly studies it, to speak now of no other Means he must use?
A62844Nay, who could make them known?
A62844Now if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory as if thou hadst not receiv''d it?
A62844Now to what purpose serv''d all these Miracles, all these Appeals, if no Regard was to be had of Mens Understandings?
A62844Now what is sound Reason except this be it?
A62844P. Bless me, good Doctor, I pray God forgive me reading such a vile Treatise; he''s an abominable Man that could write it; but what?
A62844P. Say you so, Doctor?
A62844Pray, Doctor, says one of his Parishioners, what think you of such a Book?
A62844Since I easily perceive the good or bad Effects of Rain upon the Earth, what should I be the better did I comprehend its Generation in the Clouds?
A62844The Disciples came and said unto him, Why speakest thou unto them in Parables?
A62844Which is above Reason, the Thing, or the Manner of it?
A62844Without conceiving Faith after this manner, how could Christ be term''d the Light of the World, the Light of the Gentiles?
A62844Without the Heat and Light of Fire, what should its Figure and Quantity serve for?
A62844and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard?
A62844are not these eternal Rounds very exquisite Inventions to giddy and entangle the Unthinking and the Weak?
A62844how shall we discern?
A62844if the Doctrines of Christ were incomprehensible, contradictory; or were we oblig''d to believe reveal''d Non- Jense?
A62844my Books worth nothing, say you?
A62844of Miracles?
A62844or is it that the Christians have a better Right to Mysteries than the Gentiles?
A62844or which should weigh most with them, these few prejudic''d Scepticks, or those thousands they converted from the Superstitions of Rome?
A62844† Quis Cereris rirus audet vulgare Profanis?
A55820* Quae pietas ei debetur à quo nihil acceperis?
A55820* Quid Leges, sine Moribus, vanae proficiunt?
A55820* Quid faciet is homo in tenebris qui nihil timet nisi Testem?
A55820* Quo alio tuti sumus quàm quod mutuis juvamur Officiis?
A55820And if it be possible for him to intermeddle, whensoever he sees convenient, how will they prove he does not?
A55820And is that Man virtuous, who is so only in Appearance, either for fear of the Law, or for the sake of his Reputation?
A55820And what''s the Harm?
A55820And who has told them that he has not done it?
A55820Are they so, indeed?
A55820Aut quid omnino, cujus nullum meritum sit, ei deberi potest?
A55820But are they indeed so?
A55820But take it at the worst; That Superstition is the sole Cause of Persecution, and of all the Mischiefs attending it: What is the Cure of this Evil?
A55820But what are those Occasions?
A55820But( says he) if their Opinion be true; What ground is there left for Piety, Sanctity, or Religion?
A55820But, how dare Men be so bold to carp at what they are not able to mend; nay, nor in the least degree to imitate?
A55820Can they be certain of this?
A55820Do they not evidently contradict the Character they pretend to?
A55820For what conceivable Right can any one have, to treat those otherwise, who are really within the Bounds of this Restriction?
A55820For who has assured the Objectors that This is not a probationary State; And that all such irregularities will be set even hereafter?
A55820For, let us examine further; What is it that can influence any Man in secure Secrecy?
A55820From whence comes this Fear?
A55820How shall we answer this?
A55820I ask then, Would the World receive any considerable Advantage by the spreading of these Opinions?
A55820If it be not; Or that we are ignorant; Who dares say it?
A55820Is Deism an ill thing?
A55820Is it because of any Disorders they observe in the Universe, that they conclude it not to have been formed by an Intelligent Workman?
A55820Is it for fear of this Mischief, that Men endeavour to destroy the Seeds, and extirpate the Roots of all Religion?
A55820Is the thing inconsistent with the Scheme of the Universe?
A55820Is this also impossible?
A55820It may then be enquired, how shall we do to know what this Uniform Rule is?
A55820Nam quid crit quare solito dignemur honore Numina, si demas velle juvare Deos?
A55820Nay sometimes to signifie those that have no such Right at all?
A55820Nay, What will any Patchings* signifie, whilst our Manners are thus corrupted?
A55820Nay, numberless Varieties of such Creatures, suited to the various Disposition of those Parts of the Universe where he has placed them?
A55820Or have Ill Men shrowded themselves under that Specious Name?
A55820Quando Leoni Fortior eripuit vitam leo?
A55820Quid in deserto loco, nactus quem multo auro spoliare possit imbecillum atque solum?
A55820Quo nemore unquam Expiravit aper majoris dentibus apri?
A55820Quone malo mentem concussa?
A55820Quorum si vera sententia est, quae potest esse Pietas, quae Sanctitas, quae Religio?
A55820Shall I set my self to seek out a System of Christianity, amongst their endless Disputes?
A55820What Breach of Symmetry do we make in the Universe?
A55820What Difference to me is there between a God that neither can influence here, nor will ever hereafter animadvert upon my Actions, and no God at all?
A55820What Effect now can the Idea of such a God as this have upon the Minds of Men?
A55820What Man in his Wits( says he) can, any other way, hope for greater Advantages, than from the Gods; in whose power it is to bestow on us the greatest?
A55820What Reformation; What Patchings of our shattered Frame, can we expect?
A55820What do I talk of perswading them to it?
A55820What is the Reason of it?
A55820What is the matter then, that this sort of Deists are so busie and industrious in propagating their Notions, and gaining Proselytes?
A55820What shall we do?
A55820What will be the Effect of it; suppose the whole World should become thus religious?
A55820What?
A55820Which of them shall I then chuse?
A55820Who is it, that would not abhor any thing that tends to the Ruin of his whole Species?
A55820Who knows it?
A55820Will some Sectaries, that may chance to see this Letter, be apt to say; Are no Systems, no Articles, no Creeds, worth enquiring into?
A55820— Fac nos singulos, quid sumus?
A57956And can this be effected without the use of Reason?
A57956And is it possible now to discern the faint and weak glimmerings of Intellectual Light through such profound and clammy darkness?
A57956And to what Purpose were our Faculties given, if they be of no use in those things wherein we most need them?
A57956Annon proprio judicio, intellectu, lumine, haec omnia peragenda sunt?
A57956Are not all these things to be done by a Man''s own proper Judgment, Intellect and Light?
A57956Are we to put off Humane Nature that we may become Religious?
A57956Atque hoc quid aliud est quam Ratio fixa& stabilis, rerum omnium rationes nexúsque immoto oculo simul advertens?
A57956Aut alterius cujuspiam lumine praeeunte ambulabo?
A57956Aut oculi claudendi penitus, quia Aquilarum carent perspicacitate?
A57956Aut quaenam alia facultas reliqua est cujus ductu veram Religionem investigemus?
A57956Can it be imagined that God intended to perplex Humane Intellect with inexplicable subtleties?
A57956Ergóne luce Meridia ● … destituti, languidiores solis radii contemptui erunt,& tenebrae reputandae?
A57956Et quem in finem datae sunt Facultates, si nulli esse possunt adjumento, cùm iis maximè est opus?
A57956For why should the Conjunction of the Deity with the Nature of Christ more trouble the Understanding then the Union of the Soul with the Body?
A57956Hallywell, Henry, d. 1703?
A57956If we once forsake the Guidance of Reason must not all Religion be owing either to Education, Superstition or some Fanatical Impulse?
A57956If we once forsake the guidance of Reason, must not all Religion be owing either to Education, Superstition, or some Fanatical Impulse?]
A57956Illéne putandus est Religionis capacissimus, qui aut superstitiosus maximè aut oscitanter credulus?
A57956Is he to be deemed the fittest subject for Religion, who is most Bigotical and carelesly credulous?
A57956Must he whose Eyes are somewhat dull, be therefore accounted stark blind?
A57956Nay further, is there need of any other Faculty in the choice of Religion, and such Principles as tend to the Regulation of Life, but only of Reason?
A57956Now what is this but fixed and stable Reason looking upon the Reasons and Connections of all things at once, and as it were with an Unmoved Eye?
A57956Num ad normam Principiorum, quae alius mente concepit, vitam meam disponam?
A57956Num affectus inordinatos argumentis non intellectis edomabo?
A57956Num alienis oculis videbo?
A57956Num alterius intellectus meam diriget voluntatem?
A57956Num cui in mentem venire potest Deum in animo habuisse intellectum humanum non- percipiendis impedire atque implicare subtilitatibus?
A57956Num cui paulò obtusior est acies, omni prorsus lumine cassus censebitur?
A57956Num ex solis miraculis?
A57956Num exuenda est natura humana, ut imbuamur Religione?
A57956Num quid ideò excellentius quia omnem excedit intelligentiam?
A57956Num quis alius nostro loco judicium feret?
A57956Num verò hoc fieri potest sine usu Rationis?
A57956Or govern my life by the mea ● … ure of another Man''s Principles?
A57956Or is any thing the more excellent and Venerable, because it exceeds all Understanding?
A57956Or must we quite shut our Eyes, because they want the sharpness and Perspicacity of Eagles?
A57956Or shall the Understanding of another direct my will?
A57956Or walk only by the light that another carries before me?
A57956Or what other Faculty is there left by who ● … e conduct we can search into the Truth of Religion?
A57956Or why should we be such Obedient Fools, as to do more for them then God would have us do for himself?
A57956Quidni itaque Deus uteretur aliquo è nobis, uti Anima Corpore, tanquam Instrumento, quo interveniente consilium suum declaret?
A57956Quidni& nos eadem Commendatio pertingat, si à quocunque dictata, tanquam legem divinitùs acceptam, severissimo examini subjiciamus?
A57956Quorsum Benignissimus Deus largitus est nobis Rationis facultatem, si nefas sit, cùm res nostra maximè agitur, eam munere suo fungi?
A57956Shall I fee with other mens Eyes?
A57956Shall I mortifie my irregular Affections with Arguments that I do not understand?
A57956Shall another Judge for us?
A57956Si Rationis partes deseramus, annon educationi, superstitioni, aut afflatui cuidam Fanatico, omnis accepta ferenda erit Religio?
A57956Supposing it be, 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 where will be the Liberty of our will?
A57956What shall this Teacher of Righteousness answer to these Things?
A57956What then can not Omnipotence do in this kind, if it would?
A57956Wherefore should a Gracious God bestow upon us the Faculty of Reason, if we must not suffer it to do its Office when our concern is most in Question?
A57956Why may not God make use of some one of us( as the Soul doth of the Body) as an Instrument by whose Intervention he may discover his Mind to us?
A57956Will it appear from Miracles alone?
A57956and where that laudable Assent to the Truth, and Aversation from Lies and Falshood?
A55818And can we call it any other than the worst, if it be such an Imposture, as you would have it to be?
A55818And how can any one do this without knowing all Truths, and having them also all ready and present in his mind to consider them in order thereto?
A55818And how then can it be said, that any thing of worldly interest can be contained either in this Religion, or those holy Books in which it is written?
A55818And therefore, say they, if signs and wonders can be wrought by false Prophets, how can they be evidences for the true?
A55818And to this I have these two Answers to return?
A55818And what Plot can be more wicked than to impose a false Religion upon Mankind?
A55818And what book can be more such, than that which is to propose a new Law to Mankind?
A55818And what but the hand of God himself backing and strengthening it in the conflict, could be sufficient to give it such a victory therein?
A55818And what greater or more desirable interest can this World afford, than such a state of advancement?
A55818And what is there that is more valued and esteemed in the opinion of all mankind, than the attainment thereof?
A55818And what worldly interest is it which they could possibly have in this matter?
A55818But how can God be more dishonoured, than by a false Religion?
A55818But if the Atheist be the deviser, what intention of Good can the device carry therewith?
A55818But whoever yet charged* Jesus Christ, or his holy Apostles with any thing like this?
A55818For can Enthusiasm raise the dead to life again, cure all manner of diseases, and work such other Miracles, as Christ and his Apostles did?
A55818For can it possibly be said that it was only by Enthusiasm that five hundred Men together saw Christ after he was risen again from the dead?
A55818For what Plot or Conspiracy have we ever known or heard of, which hath been thus managed, and hath not had some false Brother or other to discover it?
A55818For what blunders and absurdities do the wisest of the Philosophers lay down concerning the Deity?
A55818For what other Power but that of the Almighty could raise a Man, who had been four days dead, again to life?
A55818For who are more fit to be imposed on, than the ignorant?
A55818For why else should they be so concerned for him?
A55818For why should the Lord himself put his hand to that work, which may as well be discharged by the Ministry of his Servants?
A55818For, did he not come from God, how could he have this wonderfull Knowledge, as thus to fore- tell things to come?
A55818Have any of the ancient enemies of our holy Religion( and it had bitter ones enough from the very beginning) ever recorded any such against them?
A55818If riches and honour be alledged as their end, I must desire you to tell me, how this could be a means to gain them?
A55818Or how can we at all rely upon them for the verifying of any doctrine which they deliver unto us?
A55818Or what other hand, but that of the Creator himself, could make him see, who had been without the natural organs of Sight from his very birth?
A55818Were he not of the Secrets of the Almighty, how could he so certainly have fore- shown, what in after- times he would bring to pass?
A55818and what can be more dangerous than to attempt it?
A55818and what can be more holy, pure, and perfect than the Precepts thereof?
A55818and what mistakes have those, who exalted Morality to the highest pitch among Men, made therein?
A55818and what more worthy of us and perfecting of our nature than that Law for the conduct of our lives which he hath delivered unto us?
A55818and who can be more easie to receive a new Religion, than those who are not prepossessed with any other to prejudice them against it?
A55818and yet did any one of them ever flinch from it?
A55818as to the matters of fact contained in the History of the New Testament whoever yet convicted any one of them of falsehood?
A55818did any one of them ever retract, what he had attested concerning it?
A55818had they in the least been guilty hereof?
A55818or have any other ever since from any good authority, or any authority at all, ever been able to tax them herewith?
A55818or that it is possible for any sort of Men so long to have born all this for the sake of a Lye?
A55818or that it was by Enthusiasm that his Apostles saw him ascend up into Heaven from Mount Olivet in the presence of them all at noon- day?
A55818or when did they ever make the least offer in order thereto?
A55818or whether any one of them ever attained to either thereby?
A55818or why he should not in so favourable a juncture, as was then offer''d for it, have possessed himself thereof?
A55818what errours and follies have they taught and practised concerning his worship?
A55818whether it prescribes us any one particular relating to his worship, but what is most agreeable to those his excellencies?
A2844418.18?
A2844438.4,& c. Where were thou when I said the Foundations of the Earth: when the morning Stars sang my praises, and all the Sons of God shouted for joy?
A28444After all this what follows?
A28444Again, I wonld fain know where she resides after her Departure from the Body?
A28444All Hail most fair one, what are you doing so solitary and serious under this Shade?
A28444And where their Thread that very first Day of their Creation?
A28444Besides, according to what Geography or Hydrography will you have Moses to describe these Rivers Antidiluvian, or Postdiluvian?
A28444Besides, if the Longaevity or Immortality of Men had depended only upon one Tree, or its Fruit, what if Adam had not sinned?
A28444Besides, suppose these I know not what kind of Waters had been above the highest Heavens, what had it signified to the people to know this Mystery?
A28444But according to this solution, pray what did God Almighty create the second day, a little extension or space?
A28444But how long did this Angelical Corps du Guard last?
A28444But shew me, if you can, what is the Substance and Body of the Soul( as it were) by it self?
A28444But the most confusedly and foolishest Question of all is, What will the World say?
A28444But what Testimony, with Authority, have they for this?
A28444But what a folly of follies is it, to think that Death should be the way to a second Life?
A28444But what shall we think Eve knew of this business?
A28444But what sort of a light was it?
A28444By what Passage those, not only Birds, but dangerous and unwelcom Beasts came over?
A28444Did Cain fall sick when he slew his Brother?
A28444For how can Evil proceed from a Being infinitely Good, and without whom nothing is, if Evil be not?
A28444For how can anothers sin, wherein we have no hand, be imputed to us?
A28444For suppose Adam had continued Innocent, how would there have been room for his Posterity within the inclosures of one Garden?
A28444For what Idea can we form of it?
A28444From whence you may deduce the Original of the Taylors Trade, but where had they Needles?
A28444Gather two Flowers off one Root, eat two Grapes off one Branch, Marry two Sisters?
A28444Generals venture their Lives for?
A28444Have you eaten of the forbidden fruit?
A28444Have you tasted them my Lady?
A28444Here, you Woman, what is this that you have done?
A28444How much easier would it have been, in a place so well watered as Paradise, to have Fenced the Garden about with a River?
A28444How there be Creatures there which are not found in this tripple Continent?
A28444If you say all, pray what offence had the rest been guilty of, that they also must loose the use of their Tongues?
A28444It is a common and ancient usage to rob upon St. Albans Road, is it therefore ● ●''e the more lawful?
A28444Let me see, had I best use it or no?
A28444Nay, what one thing doth she?
A28444Not of that Felicity only which I term''d Divine, but even the other esteem''d human?
A28444Nothing is sweeter, nothing more wholsom than this very fruit; why then should he forbid it, unless he were in jest?
A28444Now is there any one of the Interpreters that will put an exact literal Construction upon these Things?
A28444Now pray tell me in what part of the Earth is this Country of Eden, where four Rivers arise from one and the same Spring?
A28444Now these( my Lord) with what others?
A28444Now to conclude with this first and principal Objection, Whether it be a Sin against the Levitical Law?
A28444Or how could the product of one Tree have been enough for all Mankind?
A28444Poets crack their Brains over their Paladian Oyl for?
A28444Quaere then upon which of these two Systems is Moses''s Hexaemeron grounded?
A28444Should they have stood Empty, Desert, and without Inhabitants?
A28444Sic vacat exiguis Rebus adesse Deos?
A28444To have guarded the Apples of the Hesperides?
A28444What a business then is it to create distance; besides to create distance the second day which did exit the first?
A28444Who love those that were dear to them, respect them, and as far as in them lyes do them good?
A28444Who told thee, said God, that thou wert naked?
A28444Why should you trouble your Husband about such a trifle?
A28444and what an infinite multitude of Souls, like shadows, would there be in so many Ages as well part, as to come?
A28444be dubious, it be not proper and convenient to consult the ancient Canons for Explanation and Illustration?
A28444be not grounded upon the Reasons contain''d in the Text?
A28444how few who honour their Memory after death?
A28444how is her Hearing perform''d?
A28444how is her Seeing?
A28444how is she employ''d?
A28444or if there be none of all this in her, what Good can there be without the same?
A28444or only inconvenient and obnoxious to Ecclesiastical Censures and Penalties, which the Ecclesiastical Court may either inflict or commute?
A28444ut ne Ante Obitum mendax arguerere?
A28444what can be more beautiful than this Apple?
A28444what kind of matter is it apart from the Body?
A28444what toucheth she?
A28444where lieth the Cogitation that she hath?
A28444who is that God that envies his Creatures the innocent delights of Nature?
A28444who rejoyce not rather as if their Obligations were cancell''d?
A28444who requite the good they did them upon their* Children, or other Relations?
A43778; pray now, before we go any further, what are your Thoughts of him?
A43778And if so Sir, pray why may not the Christians believe there is a Trinity, though some of them may differ in what we must believe concerning it?
A43778And not only for His, but for any other Man, or Body of Men, as well as King William, when these Men shall think fit to find a Crack in his Covenants?
A43778And pray Sir, why may we not renounce all unintelligible Mysteries?
A43778And that none are promoted to Dignities but such who come in upon this Title; as is said Pages the 12th and 13th?
A43778And that their Controversie at bottom only is, How they shall make the best Market of the People?
A43778And what Answer Sir, can you make to this Charge?
A43778And where shall we find( Sir said he) such a Man, with all these Qualifications?
A43778But Sir, Can you deny that Dr. S. set up a De Facto- ship?
A43778But now we are talking of Title- making, pray Sir, what Title would this Man be pleased with?
A43778But pray Sir, are there any of the Clergy preferred, but such as come in upon the De Facto Title?
A43778But pray Sir, can you deny but that the Ambition and Pride of the Clergy has been often the Ruin of this Government?
A43778But pray Sir, how shall he make it out as to the Chancellor and Twelve Judges?
A43778But pray Sir, let me ask you one Question more, if you please, before we have done?
A43778But pray Sir, said I, how can this be?
A43778But pray Sir: If there be any Bishops guilty of this Man''s Charge, why did he not Name them?
A43778But pray what can you say to A''s abusing the Honourable Sir R. H. for his Excellent Treatise?
A43778But suppose he doth both meet him, and ask him; must all follow what this Man says?
A43778But this you call Sir, Proclaiming of War; and Rivalling of Sovereignty, do you not?
A43778But what wickedness may not the Fatalists be guilty of, and charge it upon God when they have done?
A43778But what''s all this to the business Sir?
A43778But who can believe him after so many malicious Invectives against them, and their Power?
A43778But who can guess what, or who he is?
A43778Can you deny Sir, but that this is now, what Non- Resistance was formerly, the Shiboleth of the Church of England?
A43778Can you doubt it Sir, is there not waging of War against Men''s Livelihoods, as well as Lives?
A43778Do they so Sir?
A43778Do you call the De Facto Title then, a Man of Straw?
A43778Do you not think that my Friend has by the last Argument plainly demonstrated, that the Bishops of England Rival( as he says) the Sovereign Power?
A43778Does not my Friend tell you plainly there are not?
A43778Does not this Man then( said he) envy the Bishops their Estates?
A43778For who can give a better Account of it, than he that has been one great Cause of it?
A43778For who that had any Regard to the Honour of his Majesty, would reflect so basely on his Wisdom and Government?
A43778Has the King his Scepter?
A43778Has the King his Throne?
A43778How Sick do they make this good Author?
A43778How heavy do they lie upon many a good Man''s Stomach?
A43778How is that proved Sir?
A43778If he did, why did he not own them?
A43778If not, why did he not answer them?
A43778If the same should happen to his Sons in England, How offensive must some Mens Neighbourhood be?
A43778If we do allow he has, is therefore the De Facto- ship the Shiboleth of the Church of England?
A43778In short, is the King Enthroned?
A43778Is it not worth its weight in Gold, as scarce as Mony is now?
A43778Is not this Argument a plain Demonstration of the Ambition and Pride of the Bishops?
A43778Nay, Does the King wear a Doublet and Breeches?
A43778Pray Sir, how does this appear?
A43778Pray Sir, how does this appear?
A43778Pray Sir, said I, what is your reason for this Opinion?
A43778Pray Sir, what would you advise my Friend to do in this Case?
A43778Pray Sir, who Rivals the Sovereignty now?
A43778Pray Sir, who leaves a Loophole for King James his Right now?
A43778Pray what Title is it Sir, that this Man would have?
A43778Pray what is that Sir?
A43778Pray who are those Sir?
A43778So has the Bishop,& c. And now, what think you Sir?
A43778Suppose this Bishop does not meet Dr. H. there, what then?
A43778The Bishop is Enthronised; Has the King a Divine Right?
A43778The Jure Divino Bishops, that say God makes the King; or this Man, that says, He makes Him?
A43778The Wars they have proclaimed Sir, pray who are they at Peace with?
A43778Then first of all Sir, as to the Nobility he may Argue, That has the King his Crown?
A43778To which my Friend replyed, and who knows Sir, saith he, what hidden Reserve this Man had when he made use of it?
A43778What Convulsions, what Vomitings do they cause in Him?
A43778What an unhappy Effect had the Spirit of Father Laud upon King Charles the First?
A43778When it shall be wholly in their Power which shall be Uppermost, the Head or the Rump?
A43778Whereby it is plain, that your differences are so great about it, that you know not what you believe your selves; and how then shall other Men know?
A43778Whether that Man be still living or no, who can tell?
A43778Who Rivals the Sovereignty now Sir?
A43778Who can believe( said he) this Author can have any grounds to Hope for what he says at last, that has read what he said before?
A43778Why Sir, was not the King made to pay Fifteen Hundred Pounds a Year to Dr. S. for a De facto- ship only?
A43778Why did he not produce the Bonds of Resignation they have taken from the Curates, and the Articles they agreed on?
A43778Why did he not tell us who they be, and where they live?
A43778Why do you think''t is of no weight Sir?
A43778Why has not Dr. S. done it Sir?
A43778Will he conclude that Government is nothing but a Piece of Kings- Craft, and that Government and Governours are Cheats both alike?
A43778as undeniable Arguments of their Pride and Ambition?
A43778but the Insolence of the Priesthood that brought about Father Laud''s, and Father Peter''s Revolutions?
A43778does the Presbyterians dealing barbarously with the Bishops and Clergy, justifie their dealing so with them, and other Dissenters?
A43778how many vacant Dignities be there then at this time in the Church of England?
A43778my Lord Chancellor has his Mace: Has the King his Purple?
A43778so have They: Has the King a Coach and Six, and a numerous Attendants of Lackyes and Foot- boys?
A43778so have They: Has the King his Robes?
A43778so have the Nobles their Coronets: Has the King his great Palaces?
A43778what makes your Friend so sweet all on a sudden on the Presbyterians?
A52412A Bottomless Depth with( I will not say a Finite, but) so very scanty a Measuer?
A52412And I pray Consider seriously, and tell me truly, do you verily think in your Consciences that your Reason is the Measure of Truth?
A52412And are you sure that you always do, I mean so as to act by it, that you hold it in Hypothesi as well as in Thesi?
A52412And can it be much less for an Infinite Intelligence to have only a Finite Intelligible for its Object?
A52412And do we not find it so when we Convert our selves to it by Study and Meditation?
A52412And do you not then plainly see that your great Maxim falls to the ground, that you are to believe nothing but what you can Comprehend?
A52412And if Christianity be no More, what Proportion( say they) will it bear to its Miraculous Introduction?
A52412And in order to all this it must also be intimately present to it, and united with it, otherwise how can it so act upon it?
A52412And indeed how is it possible it should consist in any thing else?
A52412And indeed if Truth were not Infinite how can the Knowledge of God be so?
A52412And now Sirs what do you think of your Principle?
A52412And what Ground of Assurance can we have from either or both of these, which are apt rather to lay a Foundation of Diffidence and Distrust?
A52412And what an extravagant Folly and Weakness, not to say Pride and Vanity is it to fancy that we can?
A52412And what better way have we to know the Distinction of things, but only that the Idea of one is not the Idea of another?
A52412And what is the Object of the Divine, or of any other Understanding, but Truth?
A52412And what will it be found to have so very Considerable as either to deserve or justifie such an Apparatus?
A52412And why proud of that which should rather deject us, and make us Humble, of our Imperfections and our Defects?
A52412And why then are we Proud?
A52412And yet as if this were not Presumption enough, do you not also make your Reason the Rule of Faith, as well as of Revelation?
A52412Are not the Sciences continually improved, and yet are there not still Depths in every Science which no Line of Thought can ever Fathom?
A52412Besides how comes it to be a Perfection of the Divine Understanding?
A52412But does the supposition of its having Limits infer that it has the same?
A52412But hold a little, before your Reason can be the Measure of Faith, must it not be the Measure of Truth?
A52412But how then can we found the Depth of Truth with so short a Line?
A52412But not to consider Hypothetical Truth, can the Bounds of that which is Absolute be ever fix''d, or its Stock ever Exhausted?
A52412But now I pray what Ideas are so but the Divine?
A52412But now how comes it to be so Dark and Cloudy?
A52412But now what can be more dark and inevident than this Implicit Faith?
A52412But now where does the Ground of this Consequence rest at last, or upon what Principle does it ultimately depend?
A52412But suppose I say he should, would you not believe it?
A52412But then I demand whence has it this Self- subsistence and Independency of Being?
A52412But then it so, what if we add the other Consideration to it?
A52412But what is it that makes them Infinite and Incomprehensible?
A52412But what then, shall we not Believe it?
A52412But why do you not care to own it?
A52412By what Logic does this Latter Proposition follow from the Former?
A52412Can any thing be a Rule to God that is not himself?
A52412Do not these seem flat Contradictions one to the other, and how then shall we adjust the Matter between them?
A52412Do you never assent to any thing but what you can Comprehend?
A52412Do you not see at the first cast of your Eye that you are unavoidably driven upon it by your profess''d Maxim?
A52412Does he Consult or Follow any thing but what is One with his own Divine Nature and Essence?
A52412For do we Dispute about Names or Things?
A52412For how I pray comes the Incomprehensibility of a thing to conclude the untruth of it?
A52412For how should we be able to know it, or upon what shall we ground this our Knowledge?
A52412For if the Object of Faith be alwayes inevident so far as Believ''d, then will it not follow that it May be believ''d though inevident?
A52412For otherwise how should their not being able to comprehend a thing, be an Argument that it is not true?
A52412For what can be More plain than that Not to Comprehend how a thing may be, and to Comprehend that it can not be, are two different things?
A52412For what though it be above Reason, is it therefore above Faith?
A52412For who can define the Out- flowings of the Divine Fecundity, or Number the Rounds of the Intellectual Scale?
A52412For why may not a thing really and in it self inevident be believ''d, when even that which is Evident is Consider''d by Faith as inevident?
A52412Has Faith any regard to Evidence?
A52412His Ground is every whit as Firm and Sure as the others, and why then should the Measure of his Assurance be less?
A52412How comes it also to be the Rule and Measure of his Will, which can be determin''d by nothing but what is just Reasonable and True?
A52412How is it that it is Present in all Places, and to all Minds, so as to be Contemplated by them all at the same time, and after the same Manner?
A52412How, for instance, shall we accord the Vnity with the Trinity, the Society of three different Persons in the perfect Simplicity of the Divine Nature?
A52412I can not Comprehend such a thing, therefore it is not True, where''s the Consequence?
A52412If a Finite Being were able to Comprehend Truth, why must Man be that Being?
A52412If the having any limits does so unqualifie it for the adequate Comprehension of Truth, how then does the having so very short and strait ones?
A52412If to nothing but what is Clear and Evident, how then to what is Obscure and Inevident?
A52412Is any thing a Perfection to God but himself?
A52412Is it not a goodly one, and richly worth all the Passion and Zeal you have express''d for it?
A52412It is as high as Heaven, what canst thou do?
A52412No, For though Finite, its Bounds may possibly be extended further than those of our Understandings, and how can we be sure that they are not?
A52412Or if to what is Obscure and Inevident, how then to nothing but what is Clear and Evident?
A52412Or is it determin''d by any Rational Motive, I mean that is taken from the Nature of the Object?
A52412Or whether there be any thing further requisite to the understanding or knowledge of a thing after a full and clear perception of it?
A52412Since there are so many inconceivable things, or if you please, Mysteries, in the Works of Nature and of Providence, why not in Religion?
A52412Well, be it so as this Gentleman pretends( though I believe upon Examination it would appear otherwise) yet what is this to the purpose?
A52412What but One thing excepted from the Verge, and placed beyond the reach of Human Knowledge?
A52412What is there in the whole Compass of Being that is Necessary, Eternal and Immutable but God and his Divine Perfections?
A52412Whence again has it its fix''d and unalterable Nature, such as we can neither add any thing to, nor diminish ought from?
A52412Why can we not enter into the Detail of Providence?
A52412Will it not inevitably lead you to the denial of all Religion?
A52412Will not this necessarily lead you to the denial of God the Foundation of all Religion?
A52412deeper than Hell, what canst thou know?
A27428And again, What is that which determines the Growth of all living Creatures?
A27428And again, such a Crust could fall but once; for what Architect can an Atheist suppose, to rebuild a new Arch out of the ruins of the other?
A27428And do the Atheists thus argue in common matters of Life?
A27428And how could all the Stars of one Asterism agree and conspire together to constitute an Universal?
A27428And how could these two Apostles have preached the Gospel to the Lystrians, if they did not use the common Language of the Country?
A27428And let us examin it further by our Critical Rule: Are the present Revolutions in circular Orbs more beneficial, than the other would be?
A27428And to what purpose did they cry out and speak to them, if the Hearers could not apprehend?
A27428And what a numerous train of Absurdities do attend such an assertion?
A27428And what relation or affinity is there between a minute Body and Cogitation, any more than the greatest?
A27428And when they scoffingly demand, Why would this imaginary Omnipotence make such mean pieces of Workmanship?
A27428And would not they have really had as much reason as our Atheists, to plead the power of the Temptation, and the propensity of Flesh and Blood?
A27428And would not this be a fine bargain indeed?
A27428Are Adultery and Fornication forbidden only by Moses and Christ?
A27428Are not God''s ways equal, O ye Children of Destruction, and are not your ways unequal?
A27428Are not envious and covetous, discontented and anxious minds tormenters to themselves?
A27428Are such opposite motions both equally mechanical, when in both cases the Matter was under the same modification?
A27428Are these Barbarians of man- eating Constitutions, that they so hanker after this inhumane Diet, which We can not imagin without horror?
A27428As if the late Discoveries of the Celestial Bodies had not plainly detected the imposture of Astrology?
A27428As if, because they are supposed to be Rational, they must needs be concluded to be Men?
A27428But how came it to be so moved?
A27428But how came it to pass at the beginning, that the Earth moved in its present Orb?
A27428But how came the Sun to be Luminous?
A27428But how could Particles so widely dispersed combine into that closeness of Texture?
A27428But how little can any Motion, either circular or other, contribute to the production of Thought?
A27428But it will be asked, why then were the Apostles so slow and backward in reclaiming them?
A27428But shall the Axis rather observe no constant inclination to any thing, but vary and waver at uncertain times and places?
A27428But shall this Motion be as much retarded, and the Seasons lengthen''d in the same proportion?
A27428But then what horrid darkness and desolation must have reign''d in the World?
A27428But then what security hath he made for the Preservation of Humane Race from the Jaws of ravenous Beasts?
A27428But then why did they not continue their descent, till they were contiguous to the Sun; whither both Mutual Attraction and Impetus carried them?
A27428But we answer; First, in the words of St. Paul: Nay, but, O Man, who art thou, that repliest against God?
A27428But what a forlorn destitute Creature is the Atheist in Distress?
A27428But what need there many words?
A27428But with the leave of these Fortune- tellers, did the Stars do this feat once only, which gave beginning to Humane Race?
A27428But would we rather part with the Parallelism?
A27428Can any Credulity be comparable to this?
A27428Did the Blood first exist, antecedent to the formation of the Heart?
A27428Do not Contentiousness and Cruelty and Study of Revenge seldom fail of Retaliation?
A27428Do not Pride and Arrogance infallibly meet with Contempt?
A27428For can it be credible to any rational person, that St. Mark could have that meaning?
A27428For do not the Nile, and the Niger, and the Ganges, and the Menam, make yearly Inundations in our days, as they have formerly done?
A27428For every Mountain must have some determinate figure, and why then not a Humane one, as possibly as another?
A27428For if All have not such a power, what is it that could make that difference between Bodies of the same sort?
A27428For if it were so; what monstrous absurdities would follow?
A27428For is not the whole Substance of all Vegetables mere modified Water?
A27428For since we have shewn, that there is an Incorporeal Substance within us: whence did that proceed, and how came it into Being?
A27428For to a man that places all his Happiness in the Indolency and Pleasure of Body, what can be more terrible than Pain or a Fit of Sickness?
A27428For what is Man?
A27428For where can we put a stop to the Efficacy of the Almighty?
A27428Hath he an Idea, or Notion, or Discovery of any more?
A27428Have we then any capacity to judge and distinguish, what is the effect of Chance, and what is made by Art and Wisdom?
A27428How could we sustain the pressure of our very Cloaths in such a condition; much less carry burthens and provide for conveniences of Life?
A27428How impudent then are the Atheists, that traduce the easie and gracious Conditions of the Gospel, as Unreasonable and Tyrannical Impositions?
A27428How many thousand years might expire, before those solitary Vessels should happen to strike one against the other?
A27428How then can that Motion be the efficient of Thought, which is evidently the Effect and the Product of it?
A27428How then can the Atheist reflect on his own Hypothesis without extreme sorrow and dejection of Spirit?
A27428If any one shall think with himself, How then can any Animal at all live in Mercury and Saturn in such intense degrees of Heat and Cold?
A27428If frequently, why is not this Rule deliver''d in Ptolemee and Albumazar?
A27428If it was necessary, how then could that Necessity ever beget Liberty?
A27428If once only at the beginning, then how came it to be discover''d?
A27428If the Earth in its first constitution had been left to it self, what horrid deformity and desolation had for ever overspread its face?
A27428If the Stars be no Deities, Astrology is groundless: and if the Stars be Deities, why is the Astrologer an Atheist?
A27428If then the Atheist can have no Imagination of more Senses than five, why doth he suppose that a Body is capable of more?
A27428Is a Crown of Righteousness, a Crown of Life, to be surrendred with laughter?
A27428Is a small drop of Rain any wiser than the Ocean?
A27428Is it not now utterly incredible, that our two Vessels, placed there Antipodes to each other, should ever happen to concur?
A27428Is not the same thing practised in other parts of that Continent?
A27428Is the Sea ever likely to be evaporated by the Sun, or to be emptied with Buckets?
A27428Must the Heart then have been formed and constituted, before the Blood was in being?
A27428Nay though we should concede an Eternity to Matter; yet why must Motion be coaeval with it?
A27428Nay we appeal to the sentence of Mankind; If a Land of Hills and Valleys has not more Pleasure too and Beauty than an uniform Flat?
A27428Now how is it possible that these things should be effected by any Material and Mechanical Agent?
A27428Now what are the mighty Promises of Atheism in competition with these?
A27428Now what more easily refuted, than that old vulgar Assertion of an universal Drought and Exsiccation of the Earth?
A27428Now which of these is the Copy, and which the Original?
A27428Now who- ever talked at that rate?
A27428Now why is the Axis of the Earth in this particular posture, rather than any other?
A27428Or if the force of it was spent, and did not wheel about and return; what mechanical cause then shall we assign for the Veins?
A27428Or if we suppose a Bound and Ne plus ultra to be mechanically fixed: but then why so great a variety in the Bulk of the several Kinds?
A27428Or were each formed in the same Orbs, in which they now move?
A27428Quis enim Philosophum sacrificare compellit?
A27428So likewise if our Sense of Hearing were exalted proportionably to the former, what a miserable condition would Mankind be in?
A27428The Iews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his Flesh to eat?
A27428The ground of the conjecture is the 18th verse of this Chapter, where some said, What will this Babler say?
A27428There''s a very remarkable passage in Tertullian''s Apology, Who forces a Philosopher to sacrifice,& c.?
A27428Thirdly, Let us imagine the whole Terraqueous Globe with its Atmosphere about it; What is there here, that can naturally effect an Universal Deluge?
A27428Was it mere Chance then, or Divine Counsel and Choice, that constituted the Earth in its present Situation?
A27428Was it nearer to the Sun, than the present distances are?
A27428Was it not so in Europe of old, and is it not now so in Africa?
A27428Were the Fables taken from the Influences, or the Influences from the Fables?
A27428Were the Membranes so thick and tough, that the Foetus must stay there, till he had teeth to eat through them, as young Maggots do through a Gall?
A27428Were the Virtues of the Stars disposed in that order and rank, on purpose only to make a pretty Diagram upon Paper?
A27428What Affairs, that most require it, could be transacted with secrecy?
A27428What Climate will he cherish them in, that they be not inevitably destroyed by Moisture or Cold?
A27428What Government can be imagin''d without Judicial Proceedings?
A27428What Natural Cause can overcome Nature it self?
A27428What a delightfull and ravishing Hypothesis of Religion is this?
A27428What a warm and vigorous influence does a Religious Heart feel from a firm expectation of these Glories?
A27428What could be the reason of this general dissent from the notion of the Resurrection, since almost all of them believed the Immortality of the Soul?
A27428What did he talk of the Unknown God, and ignorantly worshipping?
A27428What enticement, what pleasure is there in common profane Swearing?
A27428What is it that holds and keeps them in fixed Stations and Intervals against an incessant and inherent Tendency to desert them?
A27428What must we impute this to?
A27428What principles of Mechanism are sufficient to explain it?
A27428What sets a bound to their stature and dimensions?
A27428What strength of Imagination can extend it self to embrace and comprehend such a prodigious Diversity?
A27428What then is become of the privilege of that organical Motion of the Animal Spirits above any other?
A27428What then, is Heaven it self, with its pleasures for evermore, to be parted with so unconcernedly?
A27428What was it then that prescribed this particular Celerity to each Motion, this proportion and temperament between them both?
A27428What whisper could be low enough, but many would over- hear it?
A27428Where are the fragments of Petosiris and Necepso, that may countenance this Assertion?
A27428Where is that aequability of Nine Months warmth to be found?
A27428Which gives an answer to the second Question, Why created so lately?
A27428Who were there then in the world, to observe the Births of those First Men, and calculate their Nativities, as they sprawl''d out of Ditches?
A27428Why are the Masculine and Feminine, the Fiery and Airy, and Watry and Earthly Signs all placed at such regular distances?
A27428Why do not all Animals continually increase in bigness during the whole space of their Lives, as it is reported of the Crocodile?
A27428Why does not every single Star shed a separate influence; and have Aspects with other Stars of their own Constellation?
A27428Why no more Aspects than diametrically opposite, and such as make aequilateral figures?
A27428Why then doth the Atheist suspect that there may possibly be any more ways of Sensation than what we have already?
A27428Will he say, that when once he is dead, this Desire will be nothing; and that He that is not, can not lament his Annihilation?
A27428Will they say that these Idea''s are performed by the Brain?
A27428Would He have been so pleased and delighted with the conviction?
A27428Would they have us bring more Witnesses, than the All of the World?
A27428and consequently of all Animals too; all which either feed upon Vegetables or prey upon one another?
A27428and what can be answer''d to the Query of St. Chrysostom?
A27428and what methods of Judicature without a Religious Oath?
A27428and whither could we retire from perpetual humming and buzzing?
A27428and will they not stand to the grand Verdict and Determination of the Universe?
A27428did it happen by Chance, or proceed from Design?
A27428is an exceeding and eternal weight of Glory too light in the balance against the hopeless death of the Atheist, and utter extinction?
A27428or at least vastly more ample and magnificent, than this narrow Cottage of a World?
A27428or at least, many Millions of Ages ago before this short span of duration of five or six thousand Years?
A27428or do not Heathen Law- givers punish such Enormities with Fines, or Imprisonment, with Exile or Death?
A27428or do we grind inanimate Corn into living and rational Meal?
A27428or have they frequently done so, and may do it again?
A27428or how could they by those Sayings restrain the People from sacrificing; if what they said was not intelligible?
A27428or rather, as he hath told us, would he not have gone down with sorrow and despair to the Grave?
A27428or what can we assign for the Highest of all possible finite Perfections?
A27428shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
A27428that he should tax his Lord and Saviour, whom he knew to be God Almighty, with Deficiency of power?
A27428this is a hard saying, who can hear it?
A27428to the temperature of the Air, to the nature of the Soil, to the influence of the Stars?
A27428what an indigent and impotent thing is his principal Creature Man?
A27428what fuller evidence can our Adversaries require, since all the Classes of known Beings are summoned to appear?
A27428why also such Constancy observed in that manifold Variety?
A27428would he have so triumph''d in being overcome?
A27428would not boundless Beneficence have communicated his divine Perfections in the most eminent degrees?