This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.
identifier | question |
---|---|
A43758 | For what was the fruit of that Dispute, and what liberty did the Contenders purchase, but a liberty to destroy themselves and ruine their Countrey? |
A43758 | or if he have power to lead them where he please, and can not raise money to maintain them, to what end will he lead them any where? |
A29394 | How do they stile the King? |
A29394 | What is an Imperial Crown? |
A29394 | What says that Oath? |
A29394 | s.n.,[ London: 1690?] |
A59476 | How long shall the Husband maintain his Dominion, or any man his property from his Friends, or his Neighbours Obstinacy? |
A59476 | What are empty Titles? |
A59476 | What is present Power, or Riches, or great Estate, wherein I have no firm no fixed Property? |
A59476 | s.n.,[ London? |
A26737 | How the onely? |
A34365 | 1. we find Saul, and that by Gods appointment( where the Text faith) hath not the Lord annointed thee to be Governour over his inheritance? |
A34365 | You will say, what? |
A34365 | must men then think and believe manifest lyes? |
A47055 | And how shall every private family be able to doe this with Securitie? |
A47055 | But if he be a Monarch I aske againe; if there be a power in the Commonwealth, which is not in him, is it subordinate to his power, or no? |
A47055 | For what cause? |
A47055 | For who can make a Law without a power? |
A47055 | The maine question is, who is the Efficient Cause of Regall or Monarchicall power? |
A47055 | The will also hath for her adaequate Object omne ens as it is bonum? |
A47055 | will not every one strive for the best possession? |
A47055 | will not the shepheards of Abraham and Lot, and of Isaac and Gerara fall to contention for water& pastures, and such like other necessary elbow roome? |
A61839 | And are they not yet for all that both bound in the exercise of those powers to obey the King and his Laws? |
A61839 | By this time I doubt not, all that are not willfully blind( for who so blind, as he that will not see?) |
A61839 | Can any think God will wink at such foul partiality? |
A61839 | Do they not both pretend their Powers to be of God? |
A61839 | For what is it cum ratione insanire, if this be not? |
A61839 | How then cometh it to pass, that these are pronounced innocent, and those guilty? |
A61839 | I demand then: As to the Regal Power, is not the case of the Bishops and of the Ministers every way alike? |
A61839 | Is there not clearly the same reason of both? |
A61839 | To deny fire to be hot, or water to be moist, or snow to be white; when our sences enform us they are such? |
A61839 | or account them pure with the bag of deceitful weights? |
A51425 | Christian Religion and conscience oblige us to subjection? |
A51425 | For who might have pretended fairer in that kinde, than the Primitive Christians against Idolatrous Persecutors? |
A51425 | In Quibus? |
A51425 | In what things we must be subject? |
A51425 | Is it fit to say to a King, thou art wicked; and to Priuces ye are ungodly? |
A51425 | Thirdly, we must not dispute their Commands, for where the word of a King is, there is power, and who may say unto him, what doest thou? |
A51425 | What is it but Rebellion which bred that confusion in Hell amongst the damned spirits? |
A51425 | What is it but subjection which continues the blessed Harmony in Heaven amongst the Angels? |
A51425 | Who might have pretended more rightly the defence of himself, of his fellow Disciples, of his Master, yea of Religion, that Saint Peter? |
A51425 | for he that provoketh him to anger, sins against his owne soule; and what then shall become of his body? |
A51425 | so fearefull, as what can be conceived to be added? |
A33467 | ? |
A33467 | And if Sincere, how cometh it to pass, that in his Confession, he hath no respect to his injured Neighbour? |
A33467 | But first, it will be necessary to ask, Whether by the Church, they mean the Catholic, or some part of it only? |
A33467 | If it be so, to what purpose are those significant Solemnities used at the Coronations? |
A33467 | Methinks, the very consideration of our Interest, and Society, should put us in mind of Subjection: for what a Polity else should we make? |
A33467 | Of this Power King Solomons Sentence is very absolute, Who shall say to a King, what dost thou? |
A33467 | Thus, if they demand, why in the Reign of Queen Mary the Romish Religion, and in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth the Reformed Religion, prevailed? |
A33467 | Were not the Religious Rites in Judea altered, according to the Genius of the Prince? |
A33467 | What is this, but to seek a pretence for Regicide? |
A33467 | Why are they Crown''d, Inthroned, Inoyled? |
A33467 | what Blood and Martyrdom might it have saved? |
A33467 | what greater Soloecism could we grant in Nature, than that the Head should give place to the Supremacy of the Foot? |
A88972 | & would not a good Learned Iurist say, that this is not only intrusion upon meeriy civill power, but upon the very Royall Rights themselves? |
A88972 | Againe I aske, seeing you make Doctors one of your four holy Functions Ecclesiasticall, constituted by Christ, in what Iudicatorie find we them? |
A88972 | And why? |
A88972 | I would gladly aske of one of these Rabbies and great Masters in Israell, how commeth it that the Commissioners of Burrowes sit there, voyce there? |
A88972 | Is it not intrinsecally inherent in the Crown or wheresoever soveraignty is fixed? |
A88972 | Is not this potest as utriusque gladii? |
A88972 | Sir, are these things consistent with Monarchie, or the obedience is due to Soveraignty and its Highest Courts? |
A88972 | Sir, are those things consistent with Monarchie? |
A88972 | Sir, can it appeare that by Holy Writ or Reason such Popular tumultuary reformations are warrantable? |
A88972 | Sir, if there were no more instances what doe you thinke of this? |
A88972 | are they too de jure divino, by divine right? |
A88972 | what Father? |
A88972 | what Scripture? |
A88972 | what man offending against the Majesty of God( which is as they fansie many times) may not be taken away by one like to a Ravilliack? |
A88972 | what practice of the Church doth warrant such a reformation? |
A50955 | And as the Law is between Brother and Brother, Father and Son, Maister and Servant, wherfore not between King or rather Tyrant and People? |
A50955 | Have they not beseig''d him and to thir power forbid him Water and Fire, save what they shot against him to the hazard of his life? |
A50955 | Have they not hunted and pursu''d him round about the Kingdom with sword and fire? |
A50955 | How much more justly then may they fling off tyranny, or tyrants? |
A50955 | To the second that he was an enemie, I answer, what Tyrant is not? |
A50955 | Which if they ever well considerd, how little leasure would they find to be the most pragmatical Sidesmen of every popular tumult and Sedition? |
A50955 | or if the Law be not present, or too weake, what doth it warrant us to less then single defence or civil warr? |
A54686 | Sr George Moor said, We know the power of her Majesty can not be restrained by any Act, why therefore should we thus talk? |
A54686 | or by what Rule of Right Reason should the King, being of full age and sanity of mind, not be permitted the right use of the Faculties of his Soul?) |
A54686 | or was God to be prayed unto to give his Judgment to the King or unto the People? |
A54686 | with which not being able to remove their fixed resolutions, he with some anger expostulating, told them, Ero nè perjurus? |
A86683 | 12. that the time of the Church''s dissipation shall be 1290. dayes? |
A86683 | 13. to have but two horns, and here to have seven Heads, and ten Horns? |
A86683 | But how comes this Beast to have seven heads, and ten Horns, since he is none of the Roman Heads? |
A86683 | But suppose there were never a Jew converted, must this make the purpose of God of none effect? |
A86683 | How can two be more contrary? |
A86683 | How is he the Beast that is? |
A86683 | How was all dasht, and that happy work retanded on a sudden? |
A86683 | Now if Daniel, in his Prophesie, should onely respect the Gentile Church, how could Iohn, Christ, and Daniel, be reconciled in their prophefies? |
A86683 | READER: I Have taken upon me one of the hardest Taskes this day in the World, and who am I that undertake it? |
A86683 | What if I did assert this? |
A59833 | How easily was it driven out without a blow? |
A59833 | Is it thus that you curse not the King, no not in your heart? |
A59833 | What a silly poor feeble thing is Popery in its proper Colours? |
A59833 | Whom do you arraign when you say that Oath ought never to have been made? |
A59833 | and do you thus overcome evil with good? |
A59833 | and what though the King to whom I swear goes about to destroy the Law? |
A59833 | by no means: Am I bound by that Oath to be one of his Instruments that shall help him to subvert the Law, and enslave my fellow subjects? |
A59833 | did he make or enact it himself? |
A59833 | is it thus that you commit your self and your cause to him that judgeth righteously? |
A59833 | is it thus that you heap Coals of Fire upon the Head of your Enemy? |
A59833 | is therefore my swearing Allegiance to him, swearing to things inconsistent? |
A59833 | or am I perjured if I refuse? |
A59833 | or did the bloody Preachers of your Doctrine of Resistance in those days suppress any of his Crimes out of a tender regard to his Person or Credit? |
A59833 | or was it not made and enforced in the good days of Queen Elizabeth, and his Grandfather King James the First? |
A59833 | or was the exacting that Oath any part of the Accusation laid to the Charge of Charles the Martyr? |
A85738 | But an Emperour, or King without a command, what other thing is he, than as a dreame without sleepe? |
A85738 | But, to what kind of Princes do the Apostles& c Prophets in Scriptures enjoyne these duties to be performed? |
A85738 | Doe you contemne the saecular power? |
A85738 | Excellently Solomon: Where the word of a King is, there is power; and who may say unto him, What dost thou? |
A85738 | For if we would take upon us to be open and professed enemies, doe you think that wee could want money or men? |
A85738 | For what is greater, what more inviolable than the Imperiall Majesty? |
A85738 | From whence Saint Augustine( whose sentence is reckoned amongst the Canons) doth thus argue: By what right do you defend the Church? |
A85738 | Shall there be any evill in the City( saith God by the Prophet Amos) which the Lord hath not done? |
A85738 | Were they so stupid and ignorant that they did not understand what power was in the Pope or People, to reduce their Kings into good government? |
A85738 | What, doe we think that they were destitute of strength, that they could not oppose one power with another, or repell one injury with another? |
A85738 | Why so? |
A85738 | With whom, is agreeable that of the Scriptures, In those dayes there was no King in Jsraell: and what follows? |
A85738 | by Gods Law, or by mans? |
A85738 | or who is So puft up with the conceit of pride, as that hee dare contemne the understanding of the King? |
A59803 | And how could so innocent a person die, but by the Hands of Vnjust and Tyrannical Powers? |
A59803 | And the Cup which my Father has given me, shall I not drink it? |
A59803 | But how then sh ● ll the Scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be? |
A59803 | For indeed can any thing be plainer than our Saviour''s Answer? |
A59803 | For, can the Apostle be thought absolutely to condemn Resistance, if he makes it only unlawful to resist, wh ● n we want power to conquer? |
A59803 | How now does David behave himself in this extremity? |
A59803 | Now, why should he entertain these men, but to defend himself against the Forces of Saul? |
A59803 | Therefore? |
A59803 | They ask him whether it were lawful to pay Tribute to Caesar? |
A59803 | What course does he take to secure himself from Saul? |
A59803 | Wherefore? |
A59803 | is it lawful to give Tribute to Caesar, or not? |
A46961 | And therefore to ask, Who shall Absolve us from our Oath to King James? |
A46961 | But because some Men have moved another Question, Who shall be Judg when there is an Insurrection, Rebellion or Invasion? |
A46961 | By what Law? |
A46961 | Has He a Throne like God? |
A46961 | If Queen Maries Laws were no Laws, because they were wicked persecuting Laws, why were they repealed? |
A46961 | Is he of Himself, and for Himself? |
A46961 | Now I would fain know wherein those who transport the King''s Liege Subjects, without any Power to transport them, differ from Kidnappers? |
A46961 | Or has he a Personal Authority from God, antecedent to Laws, to be a King? |
A46961 | Or has he the Natural Authority of a Father to govern his Children? |
A46961 | Or were Mankind made in the day of their Creation, by Nations, and created Prince and People, as they were created Male and Female? |
A46961 | Then it must be proved that he has begotten his Three Kingdoms, and all the People in all other His Majesty''s Dominions? |
A46961 | This Personal Authority of the King, antecedent to all the Laws of the Land, independent on them, and superiour to them: whence is it? |
A46961 | Was it not thus when the Two Houses were erected, and endowed with the like Power? |
A46961 | Where is Arbitrariness then? |
A46961 | and consequently, whether there be occasion or not, according to Law, to imploy the Militia, and to draw them forth into Actual Service? |
A46961 | or those that destroy them, without any Power to destroy them, differ from Murderers? |
A46961 | why were they not declared to be null from the beginning? |
A07819 | & qui non Graeci? |
A07819 | And will any Scottish have Scotland go for lesse? |
A07819 | But how now? |
A07819 | But what, Every soul subject? |
A07819 | But would any of his Servants seeke to destroy Any for his sake? |
A07819 | For were not these Powers heathen Governors? |
A07819 | Here you hear his profession, will you see it in his practise? |
A07819 | I have said this, and have good warrant for it; for when King David, in the like case, —( like Case? |
A07819 | I. Fond, for what saith the Canon? |
A07819 | Now all these being conspicuous in this One, what but black malice can cast a Cloud upon such brightnesse? |
A07819 | So say the Romish, but why? |
A07819 | This case being so plain, that any man may understand the necessitiy of subjection in Everyman, our next Quaere must be, To Whom? |
A07819 | What other meaning can mortall weapons have then mortall wounds? |
A07819 | What? |
A07819 | Whence was that Epistle written? |
A07819 | With what front or face then could these Romish, and other Seducers distort this Text, for proofe of a Rebellious Conclusion? |
A07819 | Yet why thus? |
A07819 | and Persecuters of the Professors thereof? |
A07819 | were not the most of them cruell Tyrants? |
A07819 | were they not all professed enemies to the Christian faith? |
A07819 | which in the next place is to be spoken of,[ He that resisteth the Power,] what? |
A29375 | ( Answer) this followes not? |
A29375 | Againe, why will this make the Parliament arbitrary, or cast the people into an implicite Faith? |
A29375 | And our Saviour when Pilate said: Knowest thou not that I have power to loose thee? |
A29375 | And sixthly, If you be overcome and die, you die for God and your Countrey; who can bring his life into a better market? |
A29375 | Are the Divines of England? |
A29375 | Are the Divines of Scotland? |
A29375 | Did hee not command the Christian Romanes to bee subject to the Romane Senate? |
A29375 | Dr. Fern, But in case he endeavour to force the contrary Religion upon his subjects, for that must be supposed how then will your Allegeance bold? |
A29375 | Here is a loud cry against Brownists and Anabaptists, but who are Brownists? |
A29375 | How can men be faithfull to you that are unfaithfull to God? |
A29375 | I brought a Testimony of the Divines of the Councell of Basil, and that hee doth not contradict: Are the Divines of Geneva of his mind? |
A29375 | That all the people went to Gilgall, and there they made Saul King: Whereupon, sayes o Mendoza, What is more plain? |
A29375 | Thirdly, what can be more plaine then the words themselves? |
A29375 | Will any else besides this Dr. make such an inference? |
A29375 | Will hee have the Diviner of Switzerland? |
A29375 | dost thou renounce the divell and all his workes? |
A29375 | has this bin for many yeares? |
A36385 | 30. about to destroy wicked Iezabel who is on my side, saith he, who? |
A36385 | And yet if one small transgression, in any of the premisses bee, as it is, enough to sinke the guilty; what will an huge heape doe? |
A36385 | Doe they meane so, as each man is drawne away and tempted, as S. Iames teacheth, of his own lusts and untamed desires? |
A36385 | Doth he not owne and uphold them in their proceedings? |
A36385 | For as now what man can be securely safe in any place? |
A36385 | For what then? |
A36385 | Heu quantum potuit terrae pelagique parari, Hoc quem civiles hauserunt sanguine dextrae? |
A36385 | If Caines own sinne alone was heavier then he could beare, what may we thinke of the numerous sinnes of a whole Nation? |
A36385 | Is it for the Libertie and freedome of our persons? |
A36385 | Just in the method of those of Rome( whom they so much abhorre) their practise here no way keepes pace with their doctrine: For why? |
A36385 | Know yee not that it will be bitternesse in the end? |
A36385 | Lastly, after the many Acts of grace; done by him already, as sure pawnes of his reall intentions for the time to come? |
A36385 | Next, who first drew sword,& gave the onset, as it were, thus putting fire to the fuell now prepared and laid together? |
A36385 | Not him whom the Lord himselfe hath trusted? |
A36385 | Not your King? |
A36385 | Now hath not the King been thus zealous for the peace of our Ierusalem; Hath not he likewise( though in vaine) thus pursued and hasted after it? |
A36385 | Quaeris Alcidae parem? |
A36385 | Shall the Sword devoure for ever? |
A36385 | So religious and just a King? |
A36385 | To this end have they divided( who knowes not?) |
A36385 | What can I say more or lesse concerning this unquiet barking humour of theirs, but this, the Lord rebuke them? |
A36385 | Who first ministred the occasion of this unnaturall war, by tumults and seditious riots, in the open streets? |
A36385 | Who lastly hath ever since most hotly Pursued and followed the businesse at first so unfortunately begun? |
A36385 | Whom God and the law both have entrusted with the charge, of so great a people? |
A36385 | Whose Oxe have I taken, or whose Asse have I taken, or whom have I done wrong to? |
A36385 | Yet some moreover there bee, who stick not to complaine, that he is still misled; So runs the phrase; But for Gods love by whom, or how? |
A25843 | 3.18 19. quoted, and commented upon? |
A25843 | Again, what hath been more frequently practised by noble enemies than severity and justice upon such as they have gotten into their power? |
A25843 | And 3ly Is that true, that the Army have alwaies lusted after the royal bed: What? |
A25843 | At this Mr. Sedgwick grows angry, and fals into passion: You lye grosly saith he: But wherein? |
A25843 | But if you should now ask of me( as the young man did of Christ) what lack we yet? |
A25843 | But to answer, First, Is the punishing of bad Governours a dissolving the foundations of Government? |
A25843 | Cocks feeding on garlick overcome others; but how? |
A25843 | Do they in the Remonstrance manifest a jealousie and fear? |
A25843 | For instance, look here good Reader, out of what water is this fish taken, and what fish is it? |
A25843 | Have ye not read what David did when he was an hungred, and they that were with him? |
A25843 | He saith, should you not rather propose, that all power, dominion and reign should be given to the Lord? |
A25843 | Here he useth the common practice of false accusers, but I shall leave that to some other pen: and why not the falshood as wel? |
A25843 | Here is some comfort for you souldiers: but will he stand to this? |
A25843 | I answer, It was Jehoshaphat''s failing, and the Lord blames him for it, saying, Should''st thou help the ungodly? |
A25843 | Is the fight of sin and godly sorrow for it, a miserable and dark principle and a very wicked practice? |
A25843 | Methinks I could say more to you, then Mordecai did to Hester, Who knowes whether thou art come to the Kingdom for such a time as this? |
A25843 | Next, he chargeth the Arme, with wofull feares, and why? |
A25843 | The answer is, If God justifie, who can condemn? |
A25843 | The preservation of the Kings person is in the covenant, but how? |
A25843 | To this his answer is, The King is the greatest sufferer in the kingdom; hath God judged him? |
A25843 | We speak not of doweries and other portions: and what serve they for, or what profit have the people by them? |
A25843 | What their eternall salvation sure, and yet may perish with the devil? |
A25843 | What''s the inference? |
A25843 | When was this once? |
A25843 | alwaies, how are they then deeply revolted and turn''d back to the world? |
A25843 | and why wil you not submit to his judgement? |
A25843 | doth a Phisitian destroy the body by removing of corrupt and filthy humors from it? |
A25843 | eng Sedgwick, William, 1609 or 10- 1669? |
A25843 | how doth he make it good? |
A25843 | in a condition better than they? |
A25843 | is God weary or remisse, that you would have men take it into their hands? |
A25843 | is there not a cause? |
A25843 | or when did Gods people fall upon punishing after God hath done it? |
A25843 | that needs some consideration, both what, and how? |
A25843 | what greater shame and dishonor can a nation lie under, then to take the son of a known and apparent adultresse, and make him their King? |
A25843 | what have they now done? |
A25843 | what is proper to every man, as a man moral, civil, natural? |
A25843 | when did God chasten or judge men, then give him to men to chasten again? |
A25843 | who of all the Kings of Canaan taken in war by Joshua, were not afterwards by his appointment put to death? |
A25843 | will ye take it out of Gods hand? |
A58824 | And doe not the Fathers assent to the same? |
A58824 | And hath it not been so ever since? |
A58824 | And is he not so in the judgement of reason? |
A58824 | And now, Beloved judge your selves, whether it is fitter to obey God or man, as the Apostles spake in another case? |
A58824 | And was it not so afterwards? |
A58824 | Belial, what? |
A58824 | But by the Prophet of God, it is resolved for God, saying, see you him whom the Lord hath chosen? |
A58824 | But hath it beene so with the Kings of England? |
A58824 | But what then? |
A58824 | Children of Belial, how? |
A58824 | Did the Divel beget these men in my Text? |
A58824 | I begin with the first, the description of Rebels, in the first words; the children of Belial saied: And first, what is here meant by Belial? |
A58824 | In a word, the inferiour Governours are made by the cheife, and who is the chiefe but the King? |
A58824 | In the expostulation, the saucie expostulation of Rebells, How shall this man save us? |
A58824 | None, no man, no assembly of men, who but God? |
A58824 | See yee him, Quem populus elegit? |
A58824 | That''s for the Jewes, you le say; It is true, and it is as true of the Nations too; what else meanes Isaiah''s Vnctus Cyrus? |
A58824 | The children of Belial said, How shall this man save us? |
A58824 | They account the King but as one of themselves, and as one chosen by themselves; and therefore they saied, How shall this man save us? |
A58824 | They did malè dicere, saying, How shall this man save us? |
A58824 | Thus it was in the daies of Moses and the Prophets; and was it not thus in the dayes of Christ and his Apostles? |
A58824 | To this is is answered by the children of Belial for the people; saying, How shall this man, This man, and no more, save us? |
A58824 | What else meanes Solomons Per me Reges regnant? |
A58824 | What reason have they for it? |
A58824 | Whether God or the People be the Author and Efficient of Monarchie? |
A58824 | Whether God or the people bee the author and efficient of Monarchy? |
A58824 | Whether it be Lawfull for Subjects to beare Armes, or to Contribute for the maintenance of a Warre against the King? |
A58824 | Whether it be lawfull for Subjects to beare armes, or to contribute for the maintenance of a warre against the King? |
A58824 | Whether it be lawfull to beare Armes, or to contribute for the maintenance of a Warre against the King? |
A58824 | Whether the King be Singulis major, but Universis minor? |
A58824 | Whether the King bee universis minor, lesse then the body representative? |
A58824 | Why else did Christ acknowledge Pilates power to be de super? |
A58824 | Why, it was because they looked on him as a single man, how shall this man save us? |
A58824 | Will you heare another Naturalist, little inferiour to this, say the same? |
A58824 | You see what is meant by these words, they despised him; will you now see why they despised him? |
A58824 | ],[ London? |
A58824 | and at his Coronation he is wedded to the Kingdome with a Ring: Why else doe wee call the King Caput Regni? |
A58824 | and hath not every body a head? |
A58824 | and the unfolding of my second question, which is, Whether the King be Singulis major, but Vniversis minor? |
A58824 | or else, how and why are they called the children of Belial? |
A58824 | whether God or the People be the Author of Monarchie? |
A58824 | whether it be lawfull for subjects to beare armes or to contribute for the maintenance of a warre against the King? |
A58824 | whether it be lawfull for subjects to beare armes or to contribute for the maintenance of a warre against the King? |
A58824 | whether the King be singulis major, but universis minor? |
A58824 | whether the King be singulis major, but universis minor? |
A58824 | why else doe we call the Ring Sponsus Regni? |
A41219 | But how came they of Subjects to be absolute Monarchs? |
A41219 | But what? |
A41219 | But would any man ever have defended the revolt of the ten Tribes, if Rehoboam had promised to conserve their Liberties? |
A41219 | Concerning the derivation of Power we answer? |
A41219 | Conscience here will see how to resolve, upon the triall of these two particulars, Whether the King or they be upon the defensive part? |
A41219 | Conscience will discern whether part is upon the defensive, by inquiring, First, Who were first in Arms? |
A41219 | Fourthly, was there ever more cause of resistence then in those dayes? |
A41219 | Hath this King forbid the exercise of the Religion established or left off to professe it himselfe? |
A41219 | I answer: But is the Religion established denied to any that now fight for it? |
A41219 | Is the King not bound to perform? |
A41219 | Must not he also have his securitie against the other, which he can not have but by Power of denying? |
A41219 | Or are these means of safety extinct in the Consent of the Senate or the two Houses? |
A41219 | Or can it be for antient Rights and undoubted Priviledges that they contend? |
A41219 | Or does Religion stand in need of a defense, which it self condemnes, a defence which would be a perpetuall scandall to it? |
A41219 | Or ha''s he not a limited power according to the Lawes? |
A41219 | Or may Protestants upon a jealousie resist a Protestant King professing the same Religion, and promising to conserve it entire to them? |
A41219 | Secondly, by inquiring what is the c ● ● se of these Arms? |
A41219 | The Apostle forbids it to them as well as to the Romans in such a case: if so, where are these means of safety by this power of resistance? |
A41219 | The preservation of Religion and Liberties is pretended, but can it be for either? |
A41219 | What do they contend for? |
A41219 | What shall we then think of this geneall Revolt from Allegiance that ha''s possessed well- near ten Tribes of twelve? |
A41219 | What then if he will take to himself more power, or not perform what he is bound to? |
A41219 | What then shall we say? |
A41219 | When can such be wanting in turbulent minds? |
A41219 | When shall the Prince be assured of safety? |
A41219 | Whether to divest the King of the Power of Arms and to use them against him, be to defend his Person, Rights, and Dignity? |
A41219 | and Whether that Case be now? |
A41219 | be in Conscience perswaded, that this is such an unanimous, free, and generall consent, the judgement of the whole kingdome? |
A41219 | had they this of resistence? |
A41219 | hath he disclaimed his trust, or not upon all occasions promised justice and libertie to his Subjects? |
A41219 | or take that sword out of his hand that God hath put into it? |
A41219 | or the people then enslaved, what means had they for their Liberties? |
A41219 | that the Prince hath his Power for the good of his people? |
A41219 | was it any otherwise then by force and arms? |
A41219 | were not the Kings then not onely conceived to be inclined so and so, but even actually were enemies to Religion, had overthrown Laws and Liberties? |
A41219 | what security had the State by it? |
A64086 | And, pray tell me, what difference is there between Madness, which is a Natural Disability and Tyranny, which is a moral incapacity to govern? |
A64086 | Does not therefore Conquest of a Nation by Arms give the Conqueror a Power from God to Rule over that People without their Consents? |
A64086 | F. But do we not also find in Scripture, that most of the great Kingdoms or Monarchies of the world have began from Conquest? |
A64086 | F. But methinks this seems hard, and of evil consequence? |
A64086 | F. But pray tell me, Sir, Is there any express Law for this Resistance; for indeed I could never hear of any such? |
A64086 | F. But pray, Sir, tell me, as to the King, Is he not the sole Supream Power in England? |
A64086 | F. But would not a Free Parliament be a much better Judge of these Violalations, than this general Body of the People? |
A64086 | F. But, pray Sir, How can this be, since our late Statutes declare the King not to be subject to any Coercive Power of the Two Houses of Parliament? |
A64086 | F. But, pray Sir, is there not an account given us in Scripture of Judges and Kings made by God''s own Appointment among the Iews? |
A64086 | F. But, pray Sir, tell me who shall judge of these Violations, or what number may be allowed to rise and redress them? |
A64086 | F. How then did it begin? |
A64086 | F. Pray how could this be done, since the King may at this day dissolve the Parliament whenever he pleases? |
A64086 | F. Pray then tell me, Sir, what is Civil Government? |
A64086 | F. Pray whence then do Kings now- a- days derive their Power,( since God hath long since left off making any Kings by Divine Precept)? |
A64086 | F. This is more than I ever heard of before; but pray proceed to tell me, what are the rest of the Liberties and Priviledges of an Englishman? |
A64086 | GOOD Morrow Neighbour; What brings you hither so early? |
A64086 | I. I grant it, if a Parliament may be had that were free and unbiass''d; but what if the King resolves not to call any? |
A64086 | Or, what if he will not call one, till he thinks he can make or pack it according to his own mind? |
A64086 | Pray what say you, Sir, to this? |
A64086 | That King James having withdrawn himself out of the Kingdom, hath abdicated the Government? |
A64086 | Was it by any Divine Precept, or else by the Consent of many men who had found the Inconveniencies of living without it? |
A64086 | Whether Their Majesties Subjects taken at Sea acting by the Late King''s Commission might not be looked on as Pirates? |
A64086 | Whether is it from God, or from the People? |
A64086 | and Queen Elizabeth*: asked all the People standing below, Whether they would have this Person to be their King or Queen? |
A64086 | and the Heirs of their Bodies? |
A64086 | for to do this, I have heard, has been declared to be Treason? |
A64086 | or can he ever cease to be King, or forfeit his Royal Dignity, if he acts never so Tyrannically? |
A64086 | or else when the Persons commissioned are made by Law incapable of the King''s Commissions, as the Popish Officers lately were? |
A64086 | or, if he does, will not give them leave to sit till they have redrest our Grievances? |
A64086 | the Estates of the Kingdom, which is all one, as to declare the Throne to be vacant? |
A64086 | whether from the very first Institution of the Government, or else by the gracious Concessions of our Kings? |
A66109 | ; It might perhaps be here no Improper Question, to ask, what this Gentleman means by so Warm an Application to the Whole Body of the Clergy? |
A66109 | And Secondly, What it is to Impugn this Supremacy, within the meaning of this Canon? |
A66109 | And for Others, give me leave to ask, only; Am I the First, of Our Order, that have appear''d on this Occasion? |
A66109 | And that instead of Preserving, they shall Act so as to divide the Vnity of the Church? |
A66109 | And was it Good Divinity then, and is it now no longer so? |
A66109 | And what should I say more? |
A66109 | But how if there be Dissention among them? |
A66109 | But if I am not mistaken in Point of Law, what is it that deserves so Tragical an Outcry, as this late Author has made against me? |
A66109 | But if both the Law be on my side; and it be no improper Enterprize for a Clergy- Man to appear in; What shall we say, more? |
A66109 | But it may be General Councils have a Fashion by Themselves: Those Congregations may be called thus; but National or Provincial, such as Ours, How? |
A66109 | But it may be this was some Imperial Power, and that the Emperours had, in this Point, more Jurisdiction than Kings? |
A66109 | But still it may be doubted how far he accounts the King''s Supremacy to be Oppressive? |
A66109 | But what say you to the 300 Years, before Constantine? |
A66109 | But what then did they do, as to this Matter? |
A66109 | But what then shall we say of all those Learned Bishops, and Clergy- Men, whose Books I have here Quoted to the same Purpose? |
A66109 | Can he Remedy the Errors of a Synod, either in Doctrine, or Discipline? |
A66109 | Did I take an Unseasonable Opportunity of Asserting this Authority? |
A66109 | How shall we do for an Assembly? |
A66109 | How then? |
A66109 | How went Assemblies then? |
A66109 | I quote Socrates for saying, that the Greatest Synods were called by the Emperors: Ergo, says he,''t is plain that the lesser Ones were not? |
A66109 | Is it that I have Asserted the King''s Authority, over the Ecclesiastical Synods of this Church, and Realm? |
A66109 | May he Assign them some Other Time or Place? |
A66109 | May he in such a Case forbid them to Meet? |
A66109 | Nay rather, what shall we say of those whole Convocations, who compiled our Articles, and Canons? |
A66109 | Or Command them not to meddle with such Causes, or Persons, as he shall judge his Honour, or Interest, to be Concern''d in? |
A66109 | Or coming, was there any One of them that did Protest against it; or pleaded the Churches Interest to meet of Themselves? |
A66109 | Or do I stand Alone in this Cause? |
A66109 | Or, because that can not be pretended; Did that Reverend Synod, which altered so many Other things, ever once touch upon this, and were stop''d in it? |
A66109 | Shall not the Prince determine the Controversie, as Constantinus, Theodosius, and other Godly Emperours did? |
A66109 | Shall we condemn them all? |
A66109 | This was then God Divinity: And what Writer is there extant, of those Times, but it may be turn''d to in him? |
A66109 | Was it then Usurped from Princes; and are, now, Princes Usurpers of it Themselves? |
A66109 | Was the King but Licensed, for a while to hold this Power till another Clergy were in, and must he then be deprived of it again? |
A66109 | Was the Time improper? |
A66109 | Were all these wrong? |
A66109 | What Gets the Magistrate by All this? |
A66109 | What if He shall differ with them in His Notion of what is his Proper Honour and Interest? |
A66109 | What if He shall think their Designs not to be so Pious as they pretend, but rather to have a great Allay of Humane Passion and Prejudice in them? |
A66109 | What if what they call Ecclesiastical Concerns should chance to have an Influence upon Civil Affairs? |
A66109 | What shall we say then? |
A66109 | Why now taketh the Bishop of Rome this upon him? |
A66109 | and continued by all his ⸪ Oppressing Successors of the Reform''d Religion; repealed by this Zealous, Church- Parliament? |
A66109 | and in what Books they have done it? |
A66109 | — But can the Magistrate call the Synod to Account for any thing they do? |
A66109 | — Did any of them refuse to come being called by Him,( Constantine) as not called aright? |
A70333 | And when Azariah, with fourscore valiant Priests, thrust out Uzziah, their lawful King, out of the Temple? |
A70333 | And when King Charles the First assisted them with Men from England? |
A70333 | And when King Charles the First, and the Bishops and Clergy of England assisted the Protestants of France? |
A70333 | And when Mattathias slew the King''s Commissioner, for compelling Men to Idolatry? |
A70333 | And when Queen Elizabeth assisted the Hollanders against their lawful Soveraign? |
A70333 | And when Saul''s Subjects swore that Saul should not kill Jonathan; and they reseued him that he died not? |
A70333 | And when he commanded the Door to be shut, and the Messenger to be held fast who was sent for his Head by the King of Israel? |
A70333 | And when she assisted the Protestants of France, against their lawful Soveraigns Charles the Ninth, and Henry the Third? |
A70333 | And when the Children of Israel slew Amasiah, their lawful King, for his Idolatry, without any appointment in Scripture, or prophecy of his Downfal? |
A70333 | And when the Primitive Christians destroyed Julian''s Idolatrous Temple in his Reign? |
A70333 | And when the Protestants joined with him upon his Arrival? |
A70333 | And when the Protestants of Austria took up Arms, Anno 1608, against Matthias King of Hungaria, for denying them the free Exercise of their Religion? |
A70333 | Can it be thought that God gave him an Absolute Authority of Life and Death over Man, who had not Authority to kill any Beast to satisfy his Hunger? |
A70333 | Children, obey your Parents,& c. If Paternal Authority be an absolute Authority, I ask, Whether it be in the eldest of the Family? |
A70333 | For if the King is not obliged to govern by those Laws that they make, to what purpose are the People to obey such Laws? |
A70333 | He afterwards breaking his Oath and Promise, the Barons said, What shall we do with this wicked King? |
A70333 | How could Adam be an Absolute Monarch, when God gave him the Herbs but in common with the Beasts? |
A70333 | If Noah was Heir to Adam( I ask) which of Noah''s Sons was Heir to him? |
A70333 | If a Government( say some) may be disturbed for any unlawful Proceedings of the Governour, or his Ministers, how can any Government be safe? |
A70333 | Is it not as reasonable to believe, that God would have cursed Adam if he had killed his Son Abel, as Cain for killing him? |
A70333 | Is it not reasonable and just I should have a right to destroy him who threatens me with Destruction? |
A70333 | Nature and the Country, have not given such Authority? |
A70333 | Then how can it be a Sin in a Nation to free themselves from an idolatrous and oppressing King? |
A70333 | Then is it not better to obey the Laws, rather than the King? |
A70333 | What is a Father to a Child more than another Person, when he endeavours to destroy him? |
A70333 | Where was the Doctrine of Passive Obedience when the Edomites revolted from Jehoram, and made themselves a King? |
A70333 | Where was the Doctrine of Passive Obedience, when Elisha prayed for Blindness to come upon those who were sent by the King of Syria to fetch him? |
A70333 | Where was the Doctrine of Passive Obedience, when the Lutheran Churches defended themselves against the Emperor Charles the Fifth? |
A70333 | Who can obey the King violating the Law? |
A70333 | Who will or can refuse to give Aid to the Law when infringed? |
A70333 | With what Face can any Man assert that Passive Obedience, without reserve, is the Doctrine of the Gospel? |
A70333 | With what Folly and Ignorance do some assert, That the Kings of England are Absolute, as proceeding from William the Conqueror? |
A70333 | With what Ignorance do some assert, that Adam was an Absolute Monarch, and that Paternal Authority is an Absolute Authority? |
A70333 | and that Adam had a Monarchical, Absolute, Supream, Patornal Power? |
A70333 | and that all Kingly Authority is a Fatherly Authority, and therefore irresistable? |
A70333 | and that no Laws can bind the King, or annul this Authority? |
A70333 | for that the Father of a Family governs by no other Law than by his own Will, and the Father is not to be resisted by his Child? |
A70333 | if so, Whether a Grandfather can dispense with his Grand- Child''s paying the Honour due to his Parents by the fifth Commandment? |
A70276 | And by them I protect you and your rights from violence, and what protection I pray can there be without strength? |
A70276 | And what Forren Nation will do either of these to the King of England if he be Armless, and without a Sword? |
A70276 | And what greater immunity and happinesse can there be to a Peeple, than to be liable to no Laws but what they make themselves? |
A70276 | And would not this suffice? |
A70276 | But Sir, I heard much of that Protestation, I pray what was the substance of it? |
A70276 | But put case they were all Papists, must His Majesty therfore be held a Favourer of Popery? |
A70276 | But what need I rove abroad so far? |
A70276 | But, Sir, what shold be the reson which mov''d them to make that insolent proposall? |
A70276 | Can your Parliament protect high Treason? |
A70276 | Cui dabit partes scelus expiant Iupiter? |
A70276 | How many Proclamations of pardon? |
A70276 | How many overtures for an accommodation did he make? |
A70276 | How often did he descend to acknowledg the manner of demanding the one and five Members in his publick Remonstrances? |
A70276 | How they multiplied in every corner in such plenty, that one might say t ● … er was a superfaetation of lies, which continue unto this day? |
A70276 | In naturall motions we find that the cause being taken away, the effect ceaseth, and will not this hold in civil Actions? |
A70276 | Let the persons suffer in the Name of God, and not the holy Order of Episcopacy But good Lord, how pittifully were those poor Prelats handled? |
A70276 | Peregrin ▪ Hath the house of Commons power to commit any but their own Members without conference with the Lords? |
A70276 | Publick Faith also, though she had but newly set up for her self, is suddenly become Bankrupt, and how could she choose? |
A70276 | The Masse? |
A70276 | Touching grievances of any kind( and what State was ther ever so pure, but some corruption might creep into it?) |
A70276 | Truly Sir, I never remember to have heard or read of such notable acts of grace and confidence from any King: but would not all this suffice? |
A70276 | Was it ever known but a Soveraign Prince might use the bodies and strength of his own naturall- born Subjects, and Liege men for his own defence? |
A70276 | Were ther any troubled for delivering their votes in the Houses? |
A70276 | What palpable and horrid lies were daily printed? |
A70276 | What reformed forein Church will acknowledg Him Defendor of the Faith, when they hear of this? |
A70276 | Yet I believe ther was a pernicious plot to introduce a new Religion, but what I pray? |
A70276 | and if ther was an errour in the proceedings, how oft did he desire his Great Councell to direct him in a course how to go on in the Empeachment? |
A70276 | how can he defend either himself, or others? |
A70276 | shall I believe the weakness ● … f our Religion to be such, as to be so easily ● … aken and overturn''d? |
A70276 | to be subject to no contribution, assessement, or any pecuniary erogations whatsoever, but what they Vote, and voluntarily yeeld unto themselves? |
A70276 | what did the Parliament for the King all this while? |
A70276 | who will give any respect o ● … precedence to his Ambassadors, and Ministers of State? |
A54581 | A: What do you here intend to refer to? |
A54581 | According to those words in Malachi, If then I be a Father, where is my honour? |
A54581 | And then having brought in his Popish opponents objection, Hem quid audio? |
A54581 | And what is the Reason which the Iudges give of this Resolution? |
A54581 | And will your Lordships allow this ecclesiastical Head no ecclesiastical Senses? |
A54581 | But I should be glad to know whether it made any fermentation in the Body of the People Representative, and what was the Result of it? |
A54581 | But doth that Explanation of the Regal Power assert any thing in Defence of the Dispensative part of it? |
A54581 | But were not their Consciences extremely erroneous who thought themselves bound then to advance Religion by War? |
A54581 | But will you then tell me of Disability being thus tacitly dispens''d with, and with a salvo to Conscience as to the obligation of humane Laws? |
A54581 | But( I beseech you) did not the Protestant Divines of the Church of Scotland then cry out of the unlawfulness or inexpedience of that Dispensation? |
A54581 | But( by the way) do you think then that Sovereign Princes offend the Law of God in Pardoning Murther? |
A54581 | Can you guess whence it is that men have imbibed this mistaken fancy? |
A54581 | Can you readily now at this time give any instance of the House of Commons th ● … n doing any thing of that Nature? |
A54581 | Did Sir William Iones maintain the King''s Power of Dispensing with Acts of Parliament? |
A54581 | Did the Parliament acquiesce in what the King had done as aforesaid? |
A54581 | Did they offend any other Uncontroverted Rights of the Crown? |
A54581 | Do you account it to have any great spreading Influence on mens Consciences here in keeping them both innocent and quiet? |
A54581 | Have you this Matter of Fact out of any of the Records in England or Scotland? |
A54581 | It seem''d very necessary in the judgment of our Governors then? |
A54581 | No Ecclesiastical Persons to be censulted with at all? |
A54581 | No not in any Circumstances of time and place? |
A54581 | No? |
A54581 | Or did the late Kings Loyal long Parliament do so in their obtaining the Act for the Habeas Corpus, and others that might be named? |
A54581 | W ● … at account doth Mr. Prynne give of that? |
A54581 | Was that Speech of the Archbishop ever printed? |
A54581 | Was that all the favour he shew''d Roman- Catholicks? |
A54581 | What a Concatenation of Perjuries was our Land so long enslaved with? |
A54581 | What? |
A54581 | Whether a mere Lay- man no Doctor of the Civil Law, may be a Bishop''s Register, contrary to an Act of Parliament? |
A54581 | Whether a mere Lay- man, no Doctor of the Civil Law, may be a Bishop''s Chancellor, and so may Excommunicate? |
A54581 | Whom do you mean by those? |
A54581 | what had become of that great work of our Reformation in this flourishing Church of England? |
A30561 | ( many which now are arisen) and if upon any particular Sect and Sort, who are such more than others? |
A30561 | And do not you proceed in the very path hereof? |
A30561 | And for what Cause did God at the first ordain it? |
A30561 | And if in Iudgment who are they to whom these things are so? |
A30561 | And if therein it stand, whether do you believe in your Consciences that God shall Bless it, and Prosper it; or he shall Destroy it, and Confound it? |
A30561 | And if your Government be not from this Ground and for this very End, shall it ever be blessed and happy, either to the Governors or Governed? |
A30561 | And is it not your Duty so to do? |
A30561 | And is not this the Iust Cause, wherefore the Lord hath suffered these Overturnings? |
A30561 | And is not this the very End of Rule and Government, and Magistracy, at this very day? |
A30561 | And ought you not to endeavour to stop this Flood of Wickedness that is broken out? |
A30561 | And shall his dayes be many, or shall his time be short; if this be revealed to you let us know? |
A30561 | And then how can you with good Conscience in the sight of God, Impose upon others, whenas your selves would not be Imposed upon in such a Case? |
A30561 | And were not these things in the Iustice of the Lords Hand? |
A30561 | And what are your Observations of the present proceedings? |
A30561 | And whether it is not Gods only and alone Peculiar Priviledge to be Lord there; and not any man to impose one upon another in Spiritual Matters? |
A30561 | And whether you believe not, that the Lord doth watch over you, with his eye that sees you, and marks all your wayes? |
A30561 | And whether you do seriously Consider of this? |
A30561 | And whether you your selves would be Imposed upon in such case? |
A30561 | And will not the Lord require it of you, if you bring Innocent blood, and Cruel Sufferings upon your selves? |
A30561 | Are the present Times and Seasons, and the proceedings, and transfactions in Mercy, or in Iudgment to the King, and his Subjects? |
A30561 | If in Mercy, to whom is it Mercy? |
A30561 | If some of you suffer, for that cause shall you have Peace with God in it, or is it for the name of Christ, as ye often say? |
A30561 | If this be your work that you are called to, must it not go on till it be finished? |
A30561 | Is it because you are more Righteous in the sight of God than they who are cast out before you; and because he loveth you, and hateth them? |
A30561 | Lastly, What is your Iudgement;( if ye dare declare it) concerning the Times and Seasons, and the present motions of them? |
A30561 | Nay, who of the Lords People shall not say, let the Lords will be done, and his Iustice Executed upon his Enemies? |
A30561 | Or whether all of them, or no part of that Suffering, which hath been upon you, were any whit Iust as from the Lord? |
A30561 | Or whether he may Tollerate none, but reduce the Government of the Church into the way of Bishops and Prelates, as it was in his Fathers dayes? |
A30561 | Or whether he may Tollerate some and not all? |
A30561 | Or whether or no it is just or unjust to God and men, that he should Reign King over these Nations? |
A30561 | Or whether shall Peace or Trouble be in the Land in his dayes? |
A30561 | Or whether upon any, or some pa ● icular Sects and Sorts of people? |
A30561 | Or, whether or no any of you did believe it, or could have believed it by your great Faith which you profess, if it had been told you long ago? |
A30561 | TO what do you Attribute the first Cause of the Advancement of this present Government? |
A30561 | What do you believe of, and concerning LIBERTY of CONSCIENCE, in all Matters appertaining to the Kingdome of God? |
A30561 | What is the very End of Rule and Government outward in this World? |
A30561 | Whether do you consider, that the Lord looks for good fruit from you, and that you should free the Land from Oppression? |
A30561 | Whether do you not believe it, and acknowledge it? |
A30561 | Whether may it not be believed, that these things had never thus been brought to pass? |
A30561 | Whether or no all that cry you up, and your Government, do it really, and out of good Conscience, and from Principles of Sincerity? |
A30561 | Whether or no ye can judge that his Reign and Government shall be blessed to himself, and these Nations, or the contrary? |
A30561 | Whether or no you do intend any Reformation from OLD Oppressions? |
A30561 | Whether you, or any of you, do adjudge it Reasonable and Equitable, that he should come& inherit the Nations of which he is born the right Heir? |
A30561 | Which of these may he do justly, and with more safety to himself, and happiness to his Government and Kingdoms? |
A30561 | Whither may he justly forgive, or avenge himself, of his and his Fathers Enemies, and if he do avenge, whether or no can that be called persecution? |
A30561 | for is not the hand of the Lord Stretched forth in Mercy, or in Iudgment accordingly as men walketh in his Fear, or without his Fear? |
A30561 | or to good Fortune( as some call it?) |
A30561 | whether upon this, or not, really consider; Was it not that Evil Doers might be Punished; And them that did well, might be Praised? |
A56832 | A King? |
A56832 | Admit that: But what necessitie may dispense with the violation of the Law of God? |
A56832 | And are not many more ripe for the same Judgement, whose notorious Crimes have branded them for their respective Punishments? |
A56832 | And did not you at the same instant by relative consequence, proclaime your selves Subjects? |
A56832 | And did the Lord of the Sabbath dispence with a morall Law, for the preservation of an Oxes life, or an Asses? |
A56832 | And is not disorder the mother of Anarchie? |
A56832 | And was he not Proclaimed before he was crowned? |
A56832 | And what is taking up of Armes, but an implyed supposition of at least equalitie? |
A56832 | And when Judgement 〈 ◊ 〉, who is not troubled? |
A56832 | And who is he? |
A56832 | And, can that liberty produce any thing but an establisht disorder? |
A56832 | And, tell me; whose power have his Adherents? |
A56832 | And, who are they? |
A56832 | Are their purses so apt to bleed to no end? |
A56832 | Are you so strict in your Preparations, as to catechize every souldier? |
A56832 | Barbarus has segetes? |
A56832 | But what? |
A56832 | But, admit Statutes may be broken, and you seeke to punish them; Who gave you the power so to doe? |
A56832 | But, in case, your side should prosper, and prevaile, what then? |
A56832 | But, when Kings and their assistance make an offensive, and a destructive warre against their Parliament, may they not then take up defensive Armes? |
A56832 | But, whence proceeds all this? |
A56832 | Can there be a stricter Precept? |
A56832 | Did they encourage their Provinces to take up Arms for the defence of their Liberties or Religion? |
A56832 | Did they endeavour by Scandals and impious Aspersions to render him odious to his people? |
A56832 | Did they seize upon or stop his Revenues? |
A56832 | God gave them, their Power, and who are thou that darest resist it? |
A56832 | God joyned the King and his power, and who dare separate them? |
A56832 | God or man? |
A56832 | Gods Word answers your silly Objection, not I: was not Saul Gods Annoynted? |
A56832 | Had not he as great an Interest in that Crown, as we have in this Common- wealth? |
A56832 | Had the Sword been a necessary stickler in Reformation, how happened it that he mistook his weapon so? |
A56832 | He that shall eat this Bread,& drink this cup of the Lord unworthily, eateth and drinketh, What? |
A56832 | How many does this Army consist of? |
A56832 | How many of these have counterfeited the honour of good Patriots, for largely contributing towards the Ruines of their Country? |
A56832 | How many of these have lately chalenged the name of sanctified Vessels, for containing the poyson of unnaturall Sedition? |
A56832 | How many of these have usurpt the stile of well- affected, for dis- affecting Peace? |
A56832 | How stands he a Marke betwixt two dangers, having nothing left him but guile enough to make him capable of a desperate Fortune? |
A56832 | If Subjects, ought they not to be subject? |
A56832 | If not, who are they? |
A56832 | If our blessed Saviour be not Representative, Tell me where of art thou a Member? |
A56832 | If so, Is it of Doctrine, or of Discipline? |
A56832 | If ye feare the alteration of the Old,( having your Soveraigns Oath, which you dare not beleeve) what other assurance can you have? |
A56832 | Improbus haec tam culta novalia miles habebit? |
A56832 | Nor was it want of strength, that he reformed not in a Martiall way: Could not he command more then twelve legions of Angels? |
A56832 | Or had he pleased to use the Arme of flesh; could not he that raysed the dead, rayse a considerable Army? |
A56832 | Or would they have slighted his gracious Offers? |
A56832 | Or( being Rulers of the Province of Babel) did they invite the Jewes into a Rebellion? |
A56832 | Or, having the proffer of a good Popish, or debaucht Commander, tell me, should he be denyed his Commission? |
A56832 | Or, if such an( almost) unpreventable evill should not ensue, think you, such swarmes of Sectaries sweat for nothing? |
A56832 | Or, is it a Truth ye want? |
A56832 | Or, is it of Discipline? |
A56832 | Or, to examine first every Officers Religion? |
A56832 | Or,( having renounced his Subjects ayde, upon his fayle) could he expect that loyalty, which now he wants upon a meere suspition? |
A56832 | Proclaimed? |
A56832 | Sir John Hotham, then Governour of Hull, who first defyed and dared his Soveraigne to his face, what is become of him? |
A56832 | So, He is tearmed a stumbling block, and does that warrant us to stumble? |
A56832 | So, He sayes, All you shall be offended because of me; and does this patronize our Offences? |
A56832 | The King a knowne Pagan commands grosse Idolatry, did these men conspire? |
A56832 | The Law is good and just: Because then we had not knowne sinne but by the Law, is it therefore lawfull for us to sinne? |
A56832 | The Law: And what Law denyes the King power to pardon Delinquents? |
A56832 | The Lords Annoynted? |
A56832 | The preservation of the old Truth, or the Institution of a New? |
A56832 | Was not Cyrus Gods Annoynted, and many more whom God acknowledges so& yet wicked Kings? |
A56832 | Was not God as able to subdue Him with so few, as to deliver them from so many? |
A56832 | Was not He as tender- eyed towards his own naturall people, as we to one another? |
A56832 | Was not He the great Reformer? |
A56832 | Was not the Truth as deare to Him,( who was the verie Truth) and the way to it as direct to Him( that was the only Way) as to us? |
A56832 | Were Plots, Policies, Propositions, Prophanations, Plunderings, Militatie Proparations, his way to Reformation? |
A56832 | Were they not his owne words, He that taketh up the Sword, shall perish by the Sword? |
A56832 | What Vices of the times have branded his Repute? |
A56832 | What are the hopes of conquest but an Ambition of Superioritie? |
A56832 | What interiour person would not think his Reputation wronged, not to take up considence upon such terrible termes? |
A56832 | What is condemning, judging, or deposing, but Supremacie? |
A56832 | What meane ye by having Truth? |
A56832 | What notorious evill hath his Majesty perpetrated to quench the sparkles of a Common Charity? |
A56832 | When the Lyon r ● ● res who trembles not? |
A56832 | When you affronted Basing- house, was that defensive? |
A56832 | When you besieged Redding, which you after slighted, was that defensive? |
A56832 | When you shot five peeces of Ordnance, before one was returned at Edge- hill, was that defensive? |
A56832 | Who limited it? |
A56832 | Who, so bitterly inveighed against Episcopall Government, should be so shot dead out of a Cathedrall Church? |
A56832 | Why was the penaltie, upon the faile, not expressed them? |
A56832 | Will not their costs, and paines expect, at least, a congratulatory connivence in the freedome of their consciences? |
A56832 | and that, of Ruine? |
A56832 | did these to strengthen their own Faction, blast their Soveraignes Name with Tyranny and Faganisme? |
A56832 | did they estrange themselves from his Presence? |
A56832 | or annihilate his Power? |
A56832 | or could there be a more impious Prince? |
A56832 | who labouring to put out the left eye of establisht Government, his left eye, and life were both put out together? |
A56832 | who was so severe an enemy against Peace should perish in the same Warre, ● e so encouraged? |
A56832 | would then our Misertes be at an end? |
A27454 | 1.4, 5. but unto Christ, and Kings? |
A27454 | Afte ● whom doth Saul pursue? |
A27454 | After a Flea? |
A27454 | After a dead Dog? |
A27454 | Am I robbed of all my money, because one thief takes it away? |
A27454 | And now behold( then) Nebuchadonozers good subjects: will you hear what advice the Prophet Daniel gives them for all this? |
A27454 | And to what place of Scripture can this nolite tangere be more aptly applyed, then to this, where we find the same words reiterated? |
A27454 | Are these men good Subjects? |
A27454 | By which of these two was CHARLES the First''s Head cut off? |
A27454 | Descend into Hell and there is a Prince of Devils: and shall only man be Independent? |
A27454 | Did bsalom do well to conspire again ● ● his Father, though he defiled Vriahs bed, and cloaked adultery with murther? |
A27454 | For the first; if Religion be any thing pushed at, think you that Rebellion will keep it up, or that it ever stood in need of such hands? |
A27454 | God hath delivered thine enemy into ● hine hand: what then? |
A27454 | Goo ● God, have we thus learnt Christ? |
A27454 | How did St. Paul exercise jurisdiction over Timothy and Titus, who were both Bishops? |
A27454 | IF the Question be asked, whether the people doe make the King or not? |
A27454 | If the people had made him themselves, or could make him, what needed they to have come unto Samuel, to bid him, make us a King to judge us? |
A27454 | Is there any evil that I have not done it, saith the Lord? |
A27454 | Is there no stroke but what the hand gives? |
A27454 | Is this the fruit of so clear a Gospel? |
A27454 | Or better advised than by him, who is the everlasting councellour? |
A27454 | Or that any mans doctrine can settle us in more peace and quietness than he, who is princeps pa ● is, the Prince of peace? |
A27454 | Paul, Timothy and Titus? |
A27454 | There were no Lord Bishops in those daies? |
A27454 | This is the day whereof the Lord said unto thee, I will deliver thine Enemy into thine hand, and thou shalt do unto him( what?) |
A27454 | Those who ruled well were to be accounted worthy of double honour, and will you not allow them a single Lordship? |
A27454 | Was not Christ a Diocesan Bishop? |
A27454 | Where do you find that Christ gave the Sacrament to any but his Disciples? |
A27454 | Who can stretch forth his hand against the Lords Anointed, and be guiltless? |
A27454 | and Gods words unto Aaron at his setting him apart for the High Priests Office? |
A27454 | and am I not rob''d because six or seven lay hold upon me? |
A27454 | and have we not found it so, if we consider the behaviour of our new made Presbyterians in England, to Charles the first, his Son? |
A27454 | and how did these two Bishops exercise jurisdiction over all the Ministers of Creet and Ephesus? |
A27454 | and lighten our eyes( what, with new Revelations how they may be reveng''d? |
A27454 | and shall the Ministers of the same Gospel be less glorious? |
A27454 | and the retu ● n of all our holy mothers care, and pains for Education? |
A27454 | and to say, give us a King? |
A27454 | and was not the World his Diocess? |
A27454 | and why are they angry with the word Priest? |
A27454 | because the true receiving of the Communion, is the receiving of the body, and blood of Christ by faith; therefore shall we have no bread and wine? |
A27454 | both these, all the Ministers in Creet and Ephesus? |
A27454 | deserve well and have well; shall we receive good from the hands of the Lord, and shall we not receive evil Princes? |
A27454 | did ever any record above seven years date, call it making of Ministers? |
A27454 | did he not protest unto his Son Henry, that he mislik''d their proud and haughty carriage ever since he was ten years of age? |
A27454 | did he not say that Monarchy and Presbytery agreed like God and the Devil? |
A27454 | did they not convene him diverse times before them, school him, Catechize him like a School- boy? |
A27454 | drink ye all of this, but they were all Apostles to whom he said so? |
A27454 | if the child be thus ignorant, what doth the childs getting up upon the Gyants shoulders advantage the child in points of controversie? |
A27454 | insomuch that it made Hasael himself( when he was told thereof) cry out, is thy servant a Dogg, that he should do all these things? |
A27454 | may we not have the signs, and the things signified also? |
A27454 | must not the child ask the Gyant what is what, of all that he beholds? |
A27454 | must prayers and tears be turned into Pike and Musket because a Nero is thy Governour? |
A27454 | or the Children of this generation to be wiser than the Fathers of old? |
A27454 | shall Elias entice Ahabs subjects to Rebellion, because he suffered Jezabel to put Naboth to death, and killed the Lords Prophets? |
A27454 | shall Issachar not be numbred amongst the other twelve, because he was none of the wisest? |
A27454 | shall Judah be depose ● from his rule and government for making a bargain with an Harlot upon the high way? |
A27454 | shall Peter take vengeance upon Herod because he put him in prison, beheaded John the Baptist, and killed James? |
A27454 | shall Reuben be no Patriarch, because he was unstable as water? |
A27454 | shall sensus factus thrust our sensus destinatus out of Scriptures? |
A27454 | shall we take Gods word into our mouths and preach Sedition, Rebellion and Insur ● ection, contrary to that word which we pretend to preach? |
A27454 | therefore did the Citizens do well to do evil, because the Lord said, I did it? |
A27454 | therefore is not the Sacrament given unto them Jure Divino, because the words were left out in the conveyance? |
A27454 | to wage War against him?) |
A27454 | was not this by Divine Institution? |
A27454 | were not Timothy and Titus Diocesan Bishops, when Creet and Ephesus were allotted to be their Diocess? |
A27454 | were not the Apostles Diocesan Bishops, when the whole World, divided into twelve parts, were their twelve Diocess? |
A27454 | what Lord or Gentleman will live within your walls? |
A27454 | what liberty is there in having freedom in the State, and none in the condition? |
A27454 | where did you find that Christ administred the Sacrament, or commanded it to be administred unto any Lay- men, or women? |
A27454 | who cast down his Throne, by taking away his Negative voice, was it not the Presbyterians? |
A27454 | will we suffer our s ● lves to be cozene ● with the g ● lded slips of error? |
A27454 | will you have more Orthodox Fathers than the Apostles? |
A59793 | 21, 22, 23 v. Art thou called, being a servant? |
A59793 | And allow that saying of David to be Scripture still, Who can stretch forth his hand against the Lord''s Anointed, and be guiltless? |
A59793 | And as for the new Covenant, where does that grant any new franchises and liberties to subjects? |
A59793 | And how could so innocent a person die, but by the hands of unjust and Tyrannical powers? |
A59793 | And the cup which my Father has given me, shall I not drink it? |
A59793 | And what follows from hence? |
A59793 | And who were these powers St. Peter resisted? |
A59793 | But does not the Apostle expresly tell them, Ye are bought with a price, be not ye the servants of men? |
A59793 | But how should these subordinate Governours come by this power to resist their Prince? |
A59793 | But how then shall the Scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be? |
A59793 | But now is it likely, that if David had had any designe to have fortified Keilah against Saul, he would have been afraid of the men of the Citie? |
A59793 | But was the Doctrine of resistance more scandalous ▪ than the Doctrine of the Cross? |
A59793 | But what follows from hence? |
A59793 | But what is it they would prove from these words? |
A59793 | But what is this now to us? |
A59793 | But what now is all this to subjection to Soveraign Princes? |
A59793 | But would it not also have made more converts? |
A59793 | But you will say, What is this to such an absolute subjection to Princes as includes Non- resistance in it? |
A59793 | By him? |
A59793 | By what Law then? |
A59793 | Can there be no wise reason given, why God may advance a bad man to be a Prince? |
A59793 | Did his doing well, make it ill for us to do as he did? |
A59793 | Did they think this so scandalous a Doctrine, that they were afraid or ashamed to publish it to the world? |
A59793 | Does he set any narrower bounds or limits, than what the Heathen Princes challenged? |
A59793 | Does the Apostle exhort the Christians too to throw off the civil powers? |
A59793 | For indeed, can any thing be plainer than our Saviour''s answer? |
A59793 | For indeed, how can people, who have no power of Government themselves, give that power, which they have not? |
A59793 | For is the power of victorious Rebels and Usurpers from God? |
A59793 | For what authoritie has a wicked and persecuting Law? |
A59793 | For what does the discontent of the greatest Ministers signifie, who can raise no forces to oppose their Prince? |
A59793 | For what glory is it, if when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye take it patiently? |
A59793 | For when they had chose a King, did God cease to be the King of Israel? |
A59793 | How does it follow, that because Princes are chose by the people, therefore they derive their power from them, and are accountable to them? |
A59793 | How now does David behave himself in this extremity? |
A59793 | How then can you prove from the duty of praying for Kings, that it is in no case lawful to resist them? |
A59793 | My other question is this, Whether a Prince have any more authority to make wicked and persecuting Laws, than to persecute without Law? |
A59793 | Now how does the death of Christ, by expiating our sins, deliver us from subjection to our civil Governours? |
A59793 | Now what is it, that makes the person of a King more inviolable and unaccountable than other men? |
A59793 | Now why should he entertain these men, but to defend himself against the forces of Saul? |
A59793 | Or that Christ, when he made us free, did deliver us from the subjection of men? |
A59793 | Shall he who was so famous for miracles, who gave eyes to the blind, and feet to the lame? |
A59793 | Tell us therefore, what thinkest thou? |
A59793 | The Apostle tells us, that the King is supreme; but over whom is he supreme? |
A59793 | The Case of mixt Communion: Whether it be Lawful to Separate from a Church upon the account of promiscuous Congregations and mixt Communions? |
A59793 | Therefore? |
A59793 | This example Iezebel threatned Iehu with: Had Zimri peace, who slew his master? |
A59793 | What can be said more expresly against resistance than this? |
A59793 | What course does he take to secure himself from Saul? |
A59793 | What shall it profit a man, though he should gain the whole world, which is something more than a single Crown and Kingdom, and loose his own Soul? |
A59793 | Whence then does an illegal act or Judgement derive its authoritie and obligation? |
A59793 | Where the word of a King is, there is power; and who may say unto him, What dost thou? |
A59793 | Whether God can not by a great many unknown ways, determine the choice of the people, to that Person, whom he has before chosen himself? |
A59793 | Whether God does nothing, but what he does by an immediate power? |
A59793 | Whether he can not appoint and choose an Emperor, unless he does it by a Voice from Heaven, or sends an Angel to set the Crown upon his head? |
A59793 | Whether the Laws of God and Nature be not as sacred and inviolable as the Laws of our Country? |
A59793 | Which is the greatest and most merciless Tyrant? |
A59793 | Who are most likely to abuse their power? |
A59793 | Why he was born of mean and obscure parents, and chose a poor and industrious life, and an accursed and infamous death? |
A59793 | Will you lift up your hand against God? |
A59793 | Would this have offended Princes, and make them more implacable enemies to Christianitie? |
A59793 | a Covetous and Rapacious Prince, or an insolent Army, and hungry Rabble? |
A59793 | a Nero or Dioclesian, or a pitcht Battel? |
A59793 | an Hereditary Prince, or the People, who are fond of innovations? |
A59793 | an arbitrary and lawless Prince, or a Civil War? |
A59793 | and can any thing be a Doctrine of the Gospel, which is truly scandalous? |
A59793 | and did he not receive the Laws and Rules of Government from him? |
A59793 | and does our praying for them, make it unlawful to resist and oppose their unjust violence? |
A59793 | and how can this be maintained, but by a Revenue proportionable to the expence? |
A59793 | and how soon would this have made the Doctrine of Non- resistance useless and out of date, by making Christians powerful enough to resist? |
A59793 | and who gave it this authoritie? |
A59793 | are we not bound to pray for all our Enemies and Persecutors? |
A59793 | by God? |
A59793 | by whom? |
A59793 | can not we pray for any man, without making him our absolute and Soverain Lord? |
A59793 | did Oliver Cromwell receive his power from God? |
A59793 | does it hence follow, therefore we may resist and oppose them, if they do? |
A59793 | does not he know how to rule us? |
A59793 | for can the Apostle be thought absolutely to condemn resistance, if he makes it only unlawful to resist when we want power to conquer? |
A59793 | how does an illegal sentence pronounced by a Judge, come to have any Authoritie? |
A59793 | how to chuse a Prince for us? |
A59793 | is it lawful to give Tribute to Caesar, or not? |
A59793 | is not the Prince as much bound to observe the Laws of God and Nature, as the Laws of his Country? |
A59793 | or ask him, Why hast thou done so? |
A59793 | or of whose hands have I received any bribe to blind mine eyes therewith? |
A59793 | or whom have I defrauded? |
A59793 | or whose Ass have I taken? |
A59793 | some illegal Taxes, or Plunderings, Decimations, and Sequestrations? |
A59793 | that Non- resistance is no duty, because it may possibly be attended with evil consequences? |
A59793 | that our subjection to men is inconsistent with our freedom in Christ? |
A59793 | the Prince, or the people? |
A59793 | to be the slaves and Vassals, the scorn and the Triumph of insolent Tyrants? |
A59793 | was it impossible for Infinite wisdom to have laid a more glorious and triumphant scene of our redemption? |
A59793 | was not the King God''s Anointed? |
A59793 | was not their King Gods Minister and Vicegerent, as their Rulers and Judges were before? |
A59793 | was there no possible way, but the condescension and sufferings of his own Son? |
A59793 | were we born for this very end, to suffer death by Herods and Pontius Pilates? |
A59793 | what agreement is there between civil government, and publick Justice and a Tyrant? |
A59793 | what authoritie has any Prince to make Laws against the Laws of God? |
A59793 | wherefore? |
A59793 | which is the greatest oppression of the Subject? |
A59793 | which will destroy most mens Lives? |
A59793 | who is most likely to make a change and alteration in government? |
A59793 | who will devour most Estates? |
A59793 | whom have I oppressed? |
A59793 | will you cast off his authority and government too? |
A27115 | 1.4, 5. but unto Christ, and Kings? |
A27115 | 5 ● This is the day wherof the Lord said unto thee, I will deliv ● r thine Enemy into thine hand, an ● thou shalt doe unto him( what?) |
A27115 | An Eagle reneweth her age, saith David, David saith so, and therefore you must believe it: but how it is done? |
A27115 | And now behold( then) Nebuchadonozers good subjects: will you hear wat advice the Prophet Daniel gives them for all this? |
A27115 | Bayly, Thomas, d. 1657? |
A27115 | Bayly, Thomas, d. 1657? |
A27115 | By which of these two was CHARLS the First''s Head cut off? |
A27115 | Descend into Hell and there is a Prince of Devils: and shall only man be Independent? |
A27115 | Did Absolon doe well to conspire against his Father, though he defiled Vriahs bed, and cloaked adultery with murther? |
A27115 | Do you not see that the Parliament can not bring any thing to maturity, and what''s the reason? |
A27115 | For the first, if Religion be any thing push''d at, think you that Rebellion will keep it up, or that it ever stood in need of such hands? |
A27115 | God hath delivered thine Enemy into thine hand: what then? |
A27115 | Good God, have we thus learnt Christ? |
A27115 | Hath God refused the soft voice to remaine in thunder? |
A27115 | IF the question be asked, whether the people doe make the King or not? |
A27115 | If for Religion we have fought all this while, when did the Church change her weapons? |
A27115 | If the Ministration of the Law be glorious, shall not the Ministration of the Gospel be much more glorious? |
A27115 | If we Fight for our Liberties, what Liberties are they that we Fight for? |
A27115 | If we fought for the Laws of the Land, whose Laws are they? |
A27115 | Is it ● awfull to give tribute to Cesar or not? |
A27115 | Is there any euil ● hat I have not done it, saith the Lord? |
A27115 | Is there no stroke but what the hand gives? |
A27115 | Is this the fruit of so clear a Gospel? |
A27115 | Paul, T ● mothy and Titus? |
A27115 | The two Houses gave out that they fought in defence of the Kings Person, Crown and Dignity, do ye beleeve them? |
A27115 | There were no Lord Bishops in those daies? |
A27115 | Those who ruled well were to be accounted worthy of double honour, and will you not allow them single Lordship? |
A27115 | Was ever Prince put to death by two such hands? |
A27115 | Was not Christ a Diocesan Bishop? |
A27115 | Where do you find that Christ gave the Sacrament to any but his Disciples? |
A27115 | Who can stretch forth ● ● s hand against the Lords Anointed ● ● d be guiltlesse? |
A27115 | after a Flea? |
A27115 | after a dead Dog? |
A27115 | after whom doth Saul pursue? |
A27115 | am I robbed of all my money, because one thief takes it away? |
A27115 | and Gods words unto Aaron at his setting him a part for the High Priests office? |
A27115 | and am I not rob''d because six or seven layes hold upon me? |
A27115 | and have we not found it so, if we consider the behaviour of our new mad ● Presbyterians in England to Charls the Frist his Son? |
A27115 | and how did these two Bishops exercise jurisdiction over all the Ministers of Creet and Ephesus? |
A27115 | and lighten our eyes( what, with new revelations how they may be reveng''d? |
A27115 | and shall the Ministers of the same Gospel be lesse glorious? |
A27115 | and the return of all our holy mothers care, and paines for education? |
A27115 | and to what place of Scripture can this nolite tangere be more aptly applied, then to this, where we find the same words reiterated? |
A27115 | and to 〈 ◊ 〉, give us a King? |
A27115 | and what successe( I pray you) had the imprisonment of Richard the 2? |
A27115 | and why are they angry with the word Priest? |
A27115 | and will he now be contented to have his Church repaired, and her breaches made up with skuls and carkasses? |
A27115 | and will you believe them still? |
A27115 | are they not supporters of that body politick whereof he is the head? |
A27115 | are they not the Kings? |
A27115 | because the true receiving of the Communion, is the receiving of the Body, and Bloud of Christ by faith; therefore shall we have no bread and wine? |
A27115 | both these, all the Ministe ● ● in Creet and Ephasus? |
A27115 | deserve well and have well; shall we receive good from the hands of the Lord, and shall we not receive evil Princes? |
A27115 | did God refuse to have his Temple built by David a man after his own heart, because only his hands were bloudy? |
A27115 | did ever any record above seven years date call it making of Ministers? |
A27115 | did he not protest unto his Son Henry, that he mislik''d their proud and haughty carriage ever since he was ten years of age? |
A27115 | did he not say that Monarchy and Presbytery agreed like God and the Devil? |
A27115 | did they not convene him diverse times before them, school him, Chatechize him like a school- boy? |
A27115 | do n''t ye believe the King did? |
A27115 | drike ye all of this, but they were all Apostles to whom he said so? |
A27115 | had not the whole Kingdom a shrewd fit of an ague then? |
A27115 | have not they given themselves the lie? |
A27115 | have they not fought then all this while upon a false ground? |
A27115 | how did Saint Paul exercise jurisdiction over Timothy and Titus who were both Bishops? |
A27115 | if for Liberty of Conscience, what doe you meane thereby? |
A27115 | if the child be thus ignorant, what doth the childs getting up upon the Gyants shoulders advantage the child in points of controversie? |
A27115 | is there one remaining of the name of Mortimer? |
A27115 | may we not have the signes, and the things signified also? |
A27115 | must bloud be tempered with morter that must bind the stones of his Temple in Vnity? |
A27115 | must not the child aske the Gyant what is what, of all that he beholds? |
A27115 | must not the child be informed by the knowing Gyant, of the difference between the mountaines& the vallies, the water and the skie, a cock& a bull? |
A27115 | must prayers and tears be turned into pike and musket? |
A27115 | nay, doth he not maintaine himself when he maintaineth them? |
A27115 | or are the smitings of brethren, strokes fit to pollish her stones withall? |
A27115 | or better advised then by him, who is the everlasting councellour? |
A27115 | or hath his spirit left the gentle posture of descending downe upon his Apostles, to the approaching of a mighty and rushing winde? |
A27115 | or that any mans doctrine can settle us in more peace and quietnesse then he, who is princeps pacis, the Prince of peace? |
A27115 | or the Children of this generation to be wiser then the Fathers of old? |
A27115 | or was it at Carisbrook- Castle in the Isle of Wight? |
A27115 | shall Elias entice A ● abs subjects to Rebellion, because he suffered Jezebell to put Naboth to death, and killed the Lords Prophets? |
A27115 | shall Issacher not be numbred amongst the other twelve, because he was none of the wisest? |
A27115 | shall Judith be deposed from his rule and government for making a bargain with a Harlot upon the high way? |
A27115 | shall Peter take vengeance upon Herod because he put him in prison, beheaded John the Baptist, and killed James? |
A27115 | shall Reuben be no Patriarch, becuse he was unstable as water? |
A27115 | shall sensus factus thrust out sensus destinatus out of the Scriptures? |
A27115 | shall we take Gods word into our mouthes and preach Sedition, Rebellion and Insurrection, contrary to that word which we pretend to preach? |
A27115 | so am I: and in all these things I have laboured more abundantly then you all; where lies the quarrell then? |
A27115 | so am I: are you for the Laws of the Land? |
A27115 | so am I: are you for the Liberties of the Subject? |
A27115 | so am I: are you for the priviledges of Parliament? |
A27115 | so am I: are you for the properties of estates? |
A27115 | that it doth one, is no argument but that it may do both: God made all things, in number, weight, and measure, and will you ● ● ● ike his word? |
A27115 | the Parliament said they ● ought only to bring him to his Parliament, was the Parliament at Holmeby house? |
A27115 | therefore did the Citizens do well to do evill, because the Lord said, I did it? |
A27115 | therefore is not the Sacrament given unto them Jure Divino, because the words were left out in the conveyance? |
A27115 | to wage war against him?) |
A27115 | was he in honour, or was he dignified by being there? |
A27115 | was not that Mortimer, who was the cause of his Imprisonment, beheaded? |
A27115 | was not this by divine institution? |
A27115 | were not all those who had a hand in it condignly punished? |
A27115 | were not ● imothy and Titus Diocesan Bishops, when Creet and Ephasus were alotted to be their Dioces? |
A27115 | were 〈 ◊ 〉 the Apostles Diocesan Bishops, when ● ● e whole world, divided into twelve 〈 ◊ 〉, were their twelves Dioces? |
A27115 | what Lord or Gentleman will live within your wals? |
A27115 | what liberty is there in having freedome in the State, and none in the condition? |
A27115 | where did you find that Christ administred the Sacrament, or commanded it to be administred unto any Lay- men, or women? |
A27115 | who cast down his Throne by taking away his Negative voice, was it not the Presbyterians? |
A27115 | will he not maintaine his leggs under him? |
A27115 | will he not maintaine the foundation of his house from sinking? |
A27115 | will we suffer our selves to be cosened with the guilded slips of errour? |
A27115 | will you have more Orthodox Fathers then the Apostles? |
A27115 | ● as, Quis potest? |
A27115 | ● nd was not the world his Dioces? |
A33908 | ''T is well for the Doctor''s Ancestors, he did not ask them what Right they had to be his Ancestors? |
A33908 | And can the Doctor find in his Heart to quarrel with Mr. Hobs after all this harmony in Opinion? |
A33908 | And can the Dr. deny these Advantages to the Usurpers upon K. Charles II? |
A33908 | And does God put his own People upon all these intolerable Inconveniencies? |
A33908 | And does not the Doctor say the same in other Words? |
A33908 | And have they a Right to his House as soon as they can turn him out? |
A33908 | And how a Man can have any Authority, who has no Right to ground it upon; or to give him a publick Character? |
A33908 | And is all this nothing? |
A33908 | And is he certain the Hebrews were troubled with none of these? |
A33908 | And is not their Reformation a sufficient Redress of the Peoples Grievances? |
A33908 | And is not this a sufficient meaning? |
A33908 | And is the Doctor offended at this? |
A33908 | And is the Property of Crowns more precarious, and slenderly guarded than that of a Cottage? |
A33908 | And ought we therefore to conclude, that God''s Laws, which provide against these Mischiefs, are either defective or unreasonable? |
A33908 | And pray does not the Doctor do the same? |
A33908 | And that the Devil would not have used Iob thus hardly, if he had not been over ruled by God Almighty? |
A33908 | And were not Iaddus and his Countrymen admirable Subjects at this rate? |
A33908 | And what Countrymen were the Romans? |
A33908 | And what Law is there to chuse a Prince in an Hereditary Kingdom? |
A33908 | And what follows? |
A33908 | And what has the Dr. to say to all this? |
A33908 | And what made him think so then? |
A33908 | And who can now deny him the Title of a Providential Monarch? |
A33908 | And who gave them this Authority? |
A33908 | And who would venture an Execution only for Robbing himself? |
A33908 | And why all these hard Words? |
A33908 | And why must that Usage be put upon Princes, which, if it was offer''d a private Person, would be thought a great Injury? |
A33908 | And will our Author say, That all this was brought to pass by the Influence and Direction of Providence? |
A33908 | And, Is not the Maintenance of Right and the Defence of the Constitution, the Tryal of Integrity, and the giving a noble Example, a very good End? |
A33908 | Are not Bishops de Facto as good as Kings of that Denomination? |
A33908 | Are such Revolutions occasion''d by those Principles which condemn them? |
A33908 | Are the Subjects bound to restore him? |
A33908 | Are they at Liberty to stand neuter? |
A33908 | Are they not bound to defend a Divine Right, which he grants is never parted from Possession? |
A33908 | As for his Flourish with the word Estates, I question whether it will do him any service; for, Who made them Estates? |
A33908 | As for the Text which he cites from Amos, shall there be Evil in a City, and the Lord has not done it? |
A33908 | At present I only desire to know, Whether God loves Peace more than Justice? |
A33908 | Because the Doctor has lead the the way? |
A33908 | Besides, what need was there of a supernatural Direction for the Resolution of a plain Case? |
A33908 | But Fourthly, Is the Doctor sure that the Apostle to the Hebrews knew that their Spiritual Rulers were all Lawfully constituted? |
A33908 | But does not Iosephus say, Iaddus was extremely concern''d how he should meet the Macedonians? |
A33908 | But here he makes a distinction without a difference; for, are not all Entails grounded upon Law, Divine upon Divine, and Human upon Human Laws? |
A33908 | But how long is this Maintenance and Owning to last? |
A33908 | But how long was this Allegiance to last? |
A33908 | But is the Doctor sure the People are at Liberty, not to assist a Prince when he does not please them? |
A33908 | But the Legality of Princes Titles, is a great Dispute among Learned Men; and how then should Unlearned Men understand them? |
A33908 | But what can the minor part of the Subjects, perhaps but a little handful, do towards the restoring their King? |
A33908 | But what if he Strikes at Religion? |
A33908 | But what if the Four Monarchies were not at an End? |
A33908 | But what if the Usurper wo n''t let the Subjects have the Priviledge of their Countrey without these Conditions? |
A33908 | But what is the Penalty the Doctor lays upon Princes, if they do n''t give Satisfaction? |
A33908 | But which way does the Great Body of the Nation absolve themselves from these Oaths? |
A33908 | But why could those Princes never have a Legal Right over the Israelites? |
A33908 | But why his Government? |
A33908 | But why is the contrary Doctrin so dangerous to the Subject? |
A33908 | But why will he not endure them? |
A33908 | But, in Answer to the Doctor''s Demand, I desire to know of him, whether our Ancestors have not a Right to Govern us? |
A33908 | But, pray who says Hereditary Right is the only Ground of the Relation between King and Subject? |
A33908 | By Law? |
A33908 | By what Authority do they these things? |
A33908 | Can Unlearned Men understand nothing about which the Learned differ? |
A33908 | Can a Crowd give a man a Dispensation purely by the Magick of their numbers, and the Disorder of their Meeting? |
A33908 | Can not Providence dispose of Kingdoms without their Leave? |
A33908 | Can the Doctor deny that Subjects are bound to assist their Prince in all just Quarrels? |
A33908 | Can they not do it Lawfully? |
A33908 | Can they rendezvouz themselves into Independency? |
A33908 | Did he order and decree the Revolt of those glorious Spirits, and over- rule them into damnation? |
A33908 | Did his infinite Wisdom fix the Government upon the most incomprehensible Basis? |
A33908 | Did we swear Allegiance to the Country, or has it any Authority over us independent of the King? |
A33908 | Do n''t Men frequently ruine their Health and their Fortunes, and make themselves miserable, by their Vices? |
A33908 | Do they not say it was unlawful for Iaddus to have born Arms, or to have solicited any others to a Revolt? |
A33908 | Do they not say then that God removes, and sets up Kings? |
A33908 | Does God hate Injustice in private Persons, and permit it at the same time to whole Communities? |
A33908 | Does God need the Wickedness of Men to bring his own Counsels to pass? |
A33908 | Does God suffer nothing but what he sees fit to be done? |
A33908 | Does God use to oblige Men to determine Disputes above their Capacity; to lead them into Labyrinths of History, and Perplexities of Conscience? |
A33908 | Does Providence and Government signifie only His Permission? |
A33908 | Does he not suffer all the Wickedness which is committed, for no Man can do an ill Thing whether God will or no? |
A33908 | Does it therefore follow that we must joyn such a prosperous Rebellion; and support it with our Interest? |
A33908 | Does the Authority of a Father last no longer than the Children are pleased to obey him? |
A33908 | Does the Choice of the People, though altogether Illegal, give them the advantage of this Character? |
A33908 | Does the Dr. think no Prince will endure a Man that has any Principles of Conscience? |
A33908 | Does their Number and Quality make them such? |
A33908 | Farther, I must ask him the old Question over again; Whether this National Submission must be Legal or Illegal? |
A33908 | Farther, Was not the destroying Iob''s Cattle and Servants, and the afflicting his Person, an Event? |
A33908 | For do n''t we read that the Devils besought our Saviour that he would suffer them to enter into the Herd of Swine, and he suffered them? |
A33908 | For may not Men make a Recognition of their Duty, and give fresh Assurances to perform that which they were obliged to before? |
A33908 | For unless the Chapters and Canons are to be understood alike; to what purpose is the History premised in the one, and repeated in the other? |
A33908 | For what does this legal Right signifie? |
A33908 | For why should a Man restore that which he is vested in by a Divine Right? |
A33908 | For, by way of Quere, I would gladly know, how there can be a Government without any Authority to administer Acts of Government? |
A33908 | For, under Favor, are not the States bound by natural and sworn Allegiance to their King? |
A33908 | Fourthly, We must Pray for an Unsettled Prince;( that is an Usurper in his own Sense) under the Name and Title of King: Why so? |
A33908 | Had they not Power and Possession on their side? |
A33908 | Has the Prince Resigned or given a Discharge under the Broad Seal? |
A33908 | Have private Rights a firmer Establishment than the publick? |
A33908 | Have they the Liberty to comply, or must they submit to the Penalty? |
A33908 | Have we any Legislative Brick and Stone? |
A33908 | He has a Right it''s granted as much as ever; say you so? |
A33908 | How can that be, when it''s supposed in the Dispute, That he has neither Legal nor Divine Authority? |
A33908 | How could that be? |
A33908 | How does the Dr. know, but that the Rumpers had a National Consent for secluding these Members? |
A33908 | However I desire to be resolved this Question, Would God have a Right to govern the World if he was not Omnipotent? |
A33908 | However, at present, he will not be thus Liberal: For if the Subjects have a bad Prince, who notoriously violates their Rights; What follows? |
A33908 | However, may not God make whom he pleases King without regard to Legal Rights? |
A33908 | I will only ask him, What he thinks of the Rebellion in Heaven? |
A33908 | I would gladly know what the Dr. means by being expresly enjoyned by the Laws of Nature: Has the Dr. any of Nature''s Volumes by him? |
A33908 | If He did, who was it He governed by? |
A33908 | If Power will govern and is a certain sign of God''s Authority, to what purpose are the States convened? |
A33908 | If he had thought it Lawful to submit, why did he not do it before? |
A33908 | If he has not command enough of his Conscience to conquer all these Scruples, what Relief can the Dr. give him? |
A33908 | If not, why should we esteem Multitudes above Justice, and side with the Subject against the Soveraign? |
A33908 | If private Disobedience ca n''t challenge a Divine Right to govern upon Success, why should a National Rebellion pretend to it? |
A33908 | If the Case be thus, What is the Reason of his sending word that he could not submit as long as Darius lived? |
A33908 | If their Precedents and Conclusions hold only for the Kings of Iudah, to what purpose are they brought? |
A33908 | If they have, can they not keep it as well as they did their former one? |
A33908 | If they have, why may they not assign over their Jurisdiction, and choose a Governor for us? |
A33908 | If they may renounce their Active Obedience, Why not their Passive too? |
A33908 | If they must be confined to Temporal Powers, why are they not capable of a farther Limitation? |
A33908 | If we are unconcerned in them, why are they couched into Canons and Principles, and reported with that particularity and exactness? |
A33908 | In a submissive petitioning way? |
A33908 | In what manner? |
A33908 | Indeed why should they not submit? |
A33908 | Is a Wife bound to entertain an Husband de Facto? |
A33908 | Is it Folly to think any Prince will endure such things? |
A33908 | Is it an Unhappiness to value our Honour and Integrity above our Lives, and to expire in Constancy and Greatness? |
A33908 | Is it because they are Personal? |
A33908 | Is it between the Lawful Prince and the Usurper? |
A33908 | Is it the Meaning of the Oath, that we should desert our Prince in his Distress, and refuse him when he has most occasion for our Service? |
A33908 | Is not God''s Authority in a bad Prince( supposing he was really such) as much as in a good one? |
A33908 | Is not this a much more accountable Method, than to resign up our Consciences to Violence, and impetuous Accidents, and to make Treason our Oracle? |
A33908 | Is not, says he, the late King, with his Heirs and Successors, dispossessed by God? |
A33908 | Is there any Reason the Creditor should forfeit, for the Insufficiency or Knavery of the Debtors? |
A33908 | It''s not amiss to ask upon whose account the Appearance of Government is to be secured under an Usurpation? |
A33908 | It''s not at all material as to the Dispute in hand, Whether the Divine Authority affects the Laws of Princes immediately or mediately? |
A33908 | May they not transfer their Right to Resistance, without any Limitation of Conditions? |
A33908 | Might they so? |
A33908 | Must the Laws be broken, and Justice be banished, that people may live at ease in their Sins, and enjoy the Advantages of Rebellion? |
A33908 | Must they not be disturbed, left they should repent and be saved, and for fear Honest Men should have their own again? |
A33908 | Nay, why should they believe any Religion at all, since there are several Learned Atheists who deny it? |
A33908 | Now I desire to know whether the New Man is a Bishop, and has a Divine Right to govern the Diocese? |
A33908 | Now did God raise a Commotion in his own Kingdom? |
A33908 | Now if he was so entirely satisfied about his new Master, why did he risque his Affairs at this rate, and stand off till Alexander was just in view? |
A33908 | Now if the Priviledge of Fathers and Husbands holds in Case of Dispossession, why not that of Kings? |
A33908 | Now is not the taking a Purse, or stealing a Man''s Cloaths, an Event? |
A33908 | Now, what does the Dr. bring to confute himself, and the Reverend Dean, and the Inference I have drawn from them? |
A33908 | Or are they not punished if they are damned for oppressing their Subjects? |
A33908 | Or does a Divine Right depend upon humane Forms and Solemnities? |
A33908 | Or does the Doctor believe it lawful for a Governor of a Town to surrender as soon as he hears the Enemy is approaching? |
A33908 | Or, by the People, who desert or break in upon their Principles? |
A33908 | Or, does the House work by way of Steams and Exhalations, as the Oracle at Delphos is said to have done? |
A33908 | Or, does the nature of Subjection leave them at Discretion, and bind no longer ▪ than they see convenient? |
A33908 | Particularly, did God Govern in England, Scotland,& c. from 1648, to 1660? |
A33908 | Right: But, under Favour, did they do well or ill in absolving themselves? |
A33908 | Sixthly, I would gladly know the Doctor''s reason why Title and Legality must always be expected in Sacred, but not in Civil Authority? |
A33908 | That is, though Lucifer were at the head of it, we ought to give him Provender, and bring our Money in the Sacks Mouth? |
A33908 | Therefore if Possession gives a Divine Right in one case, why not in the other? |
A33908 | They can wait God Almighty''s leisure, retain their Integrity, and save their Souls: And is all this nothing? |
A33908 | This is a severe Charge; How does he purge himself? |
A33908 | Was Iaddus assured that Alexander could not march his Forces to Ierusalem as long as Darius was living? |
A33908 | Was it their way to make the Bishop vote against the Lord; and not only clash with the State, but with themselves? |
A33908 | Were they not Foreigners? |
A33908 | What Authority does the Doctor bring to shew the Emperor''s Titles defective? |
A33908 | What Right have the Members to depose the Head, and Inferiors to displace their Supreme? |
A33908 | What a mortal Obstinacy was this? |
A33908 | What does he think of the Kingdom of Satan, is not that called the Power of Darkness? |
A33908 | What if he has an aversion to Violence, and hates to strengthen the Workers of Iniquity? |
A33908 | What if he is afflicted to see a brave, a generous, and good- natur''d Prince so deeply injured? |
A33908 | What if it is enjoyned us by undeniable Consequence, is not that sufficient without a plain Text? |
A33908 | What if they have an Inclination to Murther, or Adultery, does the Universality of the Consent make such Practices innocent and warrantable? |
A33908 | What if they should willingly submit to the setting up the Alcoran? |
A33908 | What is more common in Religion, and Civil Conversation, than to renew former Engagements, by repeated Promises, and Solemnities of Action? |
A33908 | What made him delay it to the last minute, and give a needless Provocation to the Conqueror? |
A33908 | What reason has an Usurper, who has neither Humane nor Divine Authority, to make himself a Iudge, and a Ruler over Men? |
A33908 | What sort of Dispute does the Dr. mean, and between whom does it lye? |
A33908 | What wonder is it then to find the Canons less wordy than the Historical Chapters? |
A33908 | When do they commence, and what Signs have we to distinguish them by? |
A33908 | When the Doctor supposes he has no Title either from Law, or Providence? |
A33908 | Whence comes it to pass then they are so perfectly sui juris, without a Release? |
A33908 | Whence then comes the sudden Alteration? |
A33908 | Wherefore will Power( humane Power) Govern? |
A33908 | Whether a man can swear away another''s Right without asking his Leave? |
A33908 | Whether he delights to see Men Brethren in Iniquity, and combine for the support of Violence? |
A33908 | Who ever heard, that unlawful Absolving, or a Dispensation against Authority and Right, signified any thing? |
A33908 | Who seems to wonder the Pharisees could not distinguish upon the Prohibition; but took it in too unlimited a sence? |
A33908 | Who would change the Title of Private Property, and throw himself out of the protection of the Law, for such a glittering Uncertainty? |
A33908 | Who would live alone, if Company can do all these Wonders? |
A33908 | Who, that could live any other way, would wear a Crown at this rate? |
A33908 | Whose Fault was that? |
A33908 | Why God allows Usurpers to represent him in the State, and denies this Privilege to those of the same Character in the Church? |
A33908 | Why could not he stand a Siege as well as the Iews had formerly done against Nebuchadnezzar? |
A33908 | Why did he fall short of the Resolution of Tyre, and Gaza, and be out done by mere Heathens in point of Loyalty? |
A33908 | Why may they not attack their lawful Sovereign in the Feild; draw their Sword against acknowledged Justice; and fire upon God Almighty? |
A33908 | Why not, if there is no Malice in the Opposition? |
A33908 | Why should Publick Authority, upon which the common Security depends, have a less firm Establishment than that of single Families? |
A33908 | Why should any Power persecute People to the death, meerly because they are willing to go Heaven, and are afraid of being damned? |
A33908 | Why should he give his Authority to Temporal Usurpers, and deny it to Spiritual? |
A33908 | Why so? |
A33908 | Why so? |
A33908 | Will it govern Right or Wrong? |
A33908 | Will the Doctor say, these Powers are ordained by God? |
A33908 | Would the Dr. have all this Care taken for the sake of Revolters? |
A33908 | Yes, the Dr. grants he may, notwithstanding his dispossession, have a Legal Right to Allegiance, and the Crown; and from whom is this Right due? |
A33908 | why so? |
A33908 | will Power govern whether God will or no? |
A50351 | ( this compellation is very emphatical) to dwell in your cieled Houses, and this House lie waste? |
A50351 | 14. v. command this as the Will of God? |
A50351 | 16. upbraiding the multitude of the People, reckon in the last place, as the highest of his Favours Temporal, That they prospered into a Kingdom? |
A50351 | 32. and this is the second glorious Reformation of Calvesworship: what was the issue, I pray you? |
A50351 | Afterwards when it was corrupted, who made the Reformation? |
A50351 | Again, in his Death, Did not our Saviour Christ acknowledge Pilate''s Power( that is the Roman, of which he was Deputy) to be from above? |
A50351 | Again, may there not be some points of Discipline, and Doctrine too, reserved as proper and peculiar for a Provincial? |
A50351 | And I pray you, may she afterward shake him off at Pleasure? |
A50351 | And did not our Saviour practise it, and his Apostles after him, and after them all the Christian Church? |
A50351 | And doth there not lie to the King extrema appellatio, the last Appeal? |
A50351 | And here, is not the Trust less and more, as it pleaseth the King to give it? |
A50351 | And if his Father be subject to another, is he not by the same Law subject to his Father''s Superiour? |
A50351 | And is not their Reformation attended with Fury and Violence, Impiety against God, sacred Persons, sacred Places, sacred Things? |
A50351 | And to what purpose is this? |
A50351 | And what can be said against modus acquirendi, the way by which such a one elected obtaineth this right? |
A50351 | And who dare to deny the Honour is from the King, the Fountain of all Honour? |
A50351 | And will they be so unjust to force this upon us in a Monarchy, with a contrary Sense destructive of Sovereignty and Supremacy in a King? |
A50351 | Are not Communities subject to dangerous Inclinations from private Incitements? |
A50351 | Are not Pharaoh, Abimelech, Hiram, Hazael, Hadad, no less honoured with the compellation of Kings, than David, Saul, or Ezekiah? |
A50351 | Are not all and every one of Subjects by Duty and Oath tyed to Salus Regis, to provide for his Safety, Honour, Wealth, and Power? |
A50351 | Are not their Representatives subject to mis- leading Factions, and ambitions of private ends? |
A50351 | Are they not all under his Protection? |
A50351 | Are they not subordinate, subject to their pre- existent Father, and to his Superiour too, if he have any? |
A50351 | Are we not tied to advance his Honour? |
A50351 | As first, to whom can it be more proper to give the Rule over men, than to him who is the onely King truly and properly of the whole World? |
A50351 | Be wise, O ye Kings, serve the Lord with Fear, kiss the Son left he be angry, and ye perish from the way; When his Wrath is kindled but a little? |
A50351 | But I pray you who are the competent Judges to determine, that our case is such? |
A50351 | But Officiis quis idoneus istis? |
A50351 | But how, I pray you, goeth this work on? |
A50351 | But leaving this, Did he not in his Ministry teach and practise it? |
A50351 | But that it hath all its Entity and Being by influence from humane Appointment? |
A50351 | But then I demand, how can this Contract be made void? |
A50351 | But what is this I pray you? |
A50351 | But what may be the proper, natural, and innocent sense of the words, Salus populi suprema lex esto? |
A50351 | But what was the effect of this work, wrought by this Paramount Law? |
A50351 | But what? |
A50351 | By Dreams; By Voice; by a crying Voice; by Writ; from whom? |
A50351 | By Moses''s rod what wonders were wrought in Egypt, and what a Miracle was it that the rod of Aaron budded, and none else of the twelve Tribes? |
A50351 | Can he make it away without betraying Gods Right, and the Trust he hath put upon him, he being God''s Vicegerent onely and Feoffee in trust? |
A50351 | Can you from hence conclude, that the Punishment of Theft is not an inviolable Order and Ordinance of Almighty God and common Equity? |
A50351 | Did he not rebuke Peter, who with his Sword would have in a Defensive way saved him from those bloudy Persecutors? |
A50351 | Did he not secure it, that it should be transmitted to the first born, that Government amongst mortal men should be immortal? |
A50351 | Did he not tell him, He that killeth by the Sword, shall perish by the Sword? |
A50351 | Did not the Campani in this way, if we may trust Livie, subject themselves totally to the people of Rome? |
A50351 | Do not our Sectaries impudently maintain, that Kings are the onely Extract of the People, having their Being and Constitution by derivation from them? |
A50351 | Do they not all of them give and grant that Saint Peter did not transmit the Power of doing Miracles to all his Successors? |
A50351 | Do they not hold that in fieri, Kings are dependent from People, but not in facto? |
A50351 | Do they not hold, that howsoever Episcopacy is a tolerable government of the Church, yet it is mutable, at the pleasure of the Church? |
A50351 | Do they not maintain that they are immediately from God but in Regard of Approbation? |
A50351 | Do we not see all the Creatures established in a Subordination one to another? |
A50351 | Do we not see that before the Woman came into the World, or a Child was born, God fixed Government in the person of Adam? |
A50351 | Doth he allow us to do wrong and seek an Opportunity to do Good? |
A50351 | Doth not Scripture express the immense Sovereignty of God and Christ over the World and Church, by the Compellation of King? |
A50351 | First, as the natural Father( suppose that Adam were living, had he not just Title to the Monarchy of the World?) |
A50351 | For now they shall say, we have no King, because we feared not the Lord; what then should a King do unto us? |
A50351 | For what were the Kings of Babylon, but to speak in our Adversaries diction, Tyranni cum titulo? |
A50351 | Fourthly, what is the reason that all Christian Emperours and Kings glory in the Sign of the Cross, and place it upon the Top of their Sacred Crowns? |
A50351 | From whence I pray you, is this, but from the sacred and inviolable God of Nature? |
A50351 | From whence is this Power? |
A50351 | Had either the Community, the collective or representative Body any other hand in it than to obey, as Moses King of Ioshurun commanded? |
A50351 | Hath any now the Liberty of his Person? |
A50351 | Hath not God in the moral Law taught it, Honora Patrem,& c. Honour thy Father,& c? |
A50351 | Hath not Royalty been thus entertained? |
A50351 | Have not these mis- called Reformations been acted, prosecuted with open and crying Injustice, not only against innocent but well deserving men? |
A50351 | Have they not all sworn, or should swear, Allegiance and Supremacy? |
A50351 | He that obeyeth not the King, fighteth against God,( what do they then that come in Arms against him?) |
A50351 | How can a Society be imagined without Order? |
A50351 | How can it be said so, seeing in them it was never found, never actuated, never exercised? |
A50351 | How can the Subject be free of Sacrilegious guiltiness to take it from him, if lavishly or inconsiderately he will make it away? |
A50351 | How dare they be so impertinent, so impudent to say, that in the People there is an underived Majesty? |
A50351 | How fare the People? |
A50351 | How in any other notion, relation, or consideration, but as the other Party Contractor in this imaginary, notional, and fancied Contract? |
A50351 | How is Religion entreated? |
A50351 | How is it imaginable that they can be said to judge in God''s place, and not receive the Power from God? |
A50351 | How much might be said, if we pleased to insist to prove our point? |
A50351 | How then can he be freed from Subjection to his Father? |
A50351 | How then can they be imagined in any other capacity than of a Subject? |
A50351 | How then? |
A50351 | I gave him, I took him away; what can you require more? |
A50351 | I pray you, is not the Father of many Sons no less Father universally to all than to every one? |
A50351 | If Kings were the Derivatives of the People and Community, in whom is that fansied, underived Majesty? |
A50351 | If all and every one hath this Power above- mentioned, where then are those that are to be ruled and governed? |
A50351 | If the King then be not authorised and furnished with sufficient power to work this effect, how can the People expect it? |
A50351 | If you will not acknowledge a subjection upon all universally, how can you tye the King to a protection of all universally? |
A50351 | In the Passages adduced consider: First, who is the Author? |
A50351 | Is he not thus by the Law of God and Nature to submit and subject himself in Reverence and Obedience to his Father? |
A50351 | Is it lawful and warrantable to you to do Evil, or give way to Evil, and to wait opportunity to do good afterward to salve all this? |
A50351 | Is it not different in some onely for such and such Cases and Causes, in others, for some others different? |
A50351 | Is it not fit then that they hold their Crowns of Christ? |
A50351 | Is it not fit, that Kings be taught so much, that with the more Alacrity and Zeal, they may advance the good of Christs Kingdom? |
A50351 | Is it not very considerable that God did not make Evah of the Earth as he did Adam, but made her of the man; and declareth too, made her for man? |
A50351 | Is not every one that cometh into the World begotten of a Father? |
A50351 | Is not the Female Sex by the Ordinance of God and Nature inferiour and subordinate to the male? |
A50351 | Is not the King bound no less to protect all his Subjects universally, than to protect every one severally, singly? |
A50351 | Is not the King by this made glorious at home, and terrible abroad? |
A50351 | Is not the case possible and probable, that Bishops of one particular Church may be more restrained than Bishops of another particular Church? |
A50351 | Is there not a great Variety and Difference in the measure and manner of the Punishment, in different Kingdoms and Nations? |
A50351 | Is there one of a thousand, if you trust Iob or Solomon, amongst them of understanding? |
A50351 | Is this to ennoble them? |
A50351 | It is from Heaven, but how I pray you? |
A50351 | Listen I pray you, to what followeth, and without a Prince, that is, there shall be no Nobility; and what more? |
A50351 | May he not by the same Power ordain a Priest without a Title or Cure? |
A50351 | May they not by the same Grounds disarm whom they will, to weaken Gods Enemies? |
A50351 | Must not the like hold betwixt a Father and his Family? |
A50351 | Next, is it not prophesied by Isaiah, that Kings shall be the Nurse- fathers of his Church, Reges erunt nutritii tui? |
A50351 | Of Supreme, then of Subordinate Command? |
A50351 | Of supreme than subordinate? |
A50351 | Of usurped and not just, than of just Government and Regal? |
A50351 | Officiis quis idoneus istis? |
A50351 | Or can you expect that God will honour you to make you fit instruments to repair again what is wrong? |
A50351 | Or whether or not in any case or exigent, a King can be subordinate? |
A50351 | Pilate demands the Question, Art thou a King? |
A50351 | Quid verba audiam cum facta non videam? |
A50351 | Quomodo enim( saith he) Reges Domino serviunt, nisi ea quae contra jussa Domini fiunt religiosâ severitate prohibendo atque plectendo? |
A50351 | See we not in the lifeless and senseless Creatures that the inferiour giveth a Tacite Reverence, and silent Obedience to the Superiour? |
A50351 | Since Christ''s Patrimony hath been despoiled, who can say, This I have? |
A50351 | Some will have it in the Collective Body, but how? |
A50351 | Take another Instance; the face of man is not much above a Span in Length or Breath, yet what an immense Variety is there in the faces of men? |
A50351 | That Matthias was one, Who will controvert? |
A50351 | That he beareth not the Sword in vain? |
A50351 | That the Sovereign hath this Power, who is so mad as to deny it? |
A50351 | The fifth and last is, Whether or not in any case it is lawful for Subjects, one, any, more, or all to oppose a Prince? |
A50351 | The proper Work of Wisdom is ordinare, to order, and to establish Order; Why then shall not all Monarchy refer its Origine to this Wisdom? |
A50351 | The second is, Whether or not, God is no more Author of Royal Power, than of Aristocratical or Democratical? |
A50351 | This is most false: Hath not the King his own Right from Almighty God? |
A50351 | This made David say, Who can touch the Lords Anointed and be innocent? |
A50351 | To both the one and the other God may justly say, Quis haec requisivit à vobis? |
A50351 | To do it or do worse? |
A50351 | To make Covenants against King or Sovereign, pretending or intending, if you will so, the Reformation of Religion, where read you it? |
A50351 | Tolle jura Imperatorum& quis audet dicere, mea est illa villa, aut meus est ille servus, aut domus baec mea est? |
A50351 | Turn the Tables, and then see what you will judge of the throw, Do not all we Subjects owe Duty to the King? |
A50351 | Two were set apart, the Decision was by Lots, and yet, I pray you, was not Matthias an Apostle by immediate Constitution from Christ? |
A50351 | Was ever any act done by them but in a tumultuary way? |
A50351 | Was there ever a greater Treason hatched and set on foot against any than him? |
A50351 | Well, but it is no great matter for Religion, if every man can enjoy his Liberty, his Honour, his Peace, live in Safety, what is Religion to us? |
A50351 | What Blood of Nobles and generous Gentry hath been shed? |
A50351 | What Desolations were there in Church and State in Saul''s Reign? |
A50351 | What Law? |
A50351 | What Property is reserved? |
A50351 | What Prophet almost hath not a hint, an Expression of this? |
A50351 | What can be more emphatically spoken? |
A50351 | What can be more fully said? |
A50351 | What can be said o ● that abominable act of the Iews, who to save themselves condemned Christ? |
A50351 | What can our Adversaries say of a Title acquired to a Kingdom by lawful Conquest? |
A50351 | What else was it that repressed the Fury of the People enraged against Gideon for destroying their Idol, but this Majesty? |
A50351 | What followeth upon all this? |
A50351 | What is the Solemnity? |
A50351 | What is the Success? |
A50351 | What need we to be afraid to speak with Scripture? |
A50351 | What rich and princely Furniture hath been destroyed? |
A50351 | What spece of Government had been then, I pray you tell me it? |
A50351 | What stately Houses have been spoiled? |
A50351 | What was 〈 ◊ 〉 I pray you, but this Authority and Majesty resplendent in him, which was a curb to the Tyranny of his Malice and Power? |
A50351 | When the Lord''s Prophets were hurt and wronged, was the Lord''s Anointed not touched? |
A50351 | Where can you shew any Truth of this kind, in Scripture so revealed, so manifested, by such miraculous, extraordinary, and admirable ways? |
A50351 | Where then is the Truth of this deceiving Maxim which worketh so much mischief, Quisque nascitur liber, every man is born a free- man in the Forrest? |
A50351 | Whether or not God is no more Author of Regal, than of Aristocratical and Democratical Power? |
A50351 | While they are instituted, but not after that they are invested with that Power derived from the Community? |
A50351 | Who can deny then, but it beseemeth a Divine most of all men to maintain or write of this subject? |
A50351 | Who can make this Subordination void, except he will ranverse the Ordinance of God and Nature? |
A50351 | Who hath made you Judges and Executers of matters of so high concernment? |
A50351 | Who hath required these things of your hands? |
A50351 | Who is so stupid to aver, that the Honour of a Lord, Baron, or Earl is from the Servant, a fellow- subject immediately? |
A50351 | Who is this Judge? |
A50351 | Who may expect a Blessing to a sinful and rebellious Course? |
A50351 | Why doth St. Peter urge obedience to the King, because that is the Will of God? |
A50351 | Why then, I pray you, shall not, should not the surrogated Father by Election enjoy the Priviledges and Rights of the Father natural? |
A50351 | Why, if it be otherwise, was it promised to Ahraham, as the highest pitch and reach of Temporal Blessings, that Kings should come of him? |
A50351 | Will not any understanding Prince, chuse rather to submit and subject his Crown to the Popes Mitre, than to the Fury and Violence of an untamed Beast? |
A50351 | Will you not, Observator, allow the King the like measure? |
A50351 | and for what purpose was it that God made both the one and the other miraculous? |
A50351 | and how Order without Priority and Posteriority? |
A50351 | and how cometh it to pass, that in such a particular way and enumeration all are given to God? |
A50351 | and that their Judgment is only to be executed by the Parish Pope? |
A50351 | and yet may he not be restrained by positive Consent and Constitution, that he shall not do it? |
A50351 | are not the best of Subjects, the best of God''s Servants kept in Prisons, like to Jeremie''s Dungeon? |
A50351 | from the most high God: from the holy one: from the Watcher: from the God of Heaven: to whom? |
A50351 | how comes it to pass that the holy Spirit hath not in any place or syllable of Scripture intimated it? |
A50351 | or is it intirely and immediately by a Trust devolved upon him from the King of Kings? |
A50351 | what Exclamations? |
A50351 | what Expressions? |
A50351 | what Reason is it? |
A50351 | what Right? |
A50351 | what have the poor sheep done? |
A50351 | who can deny it? |
A50351 | who doubteth of this? |
A50351 | 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉, Rulers? |
A28864 | 27. i If we have sowen unto you spirituall things, is it a great thing, if we shall reap ▪ your carnall things? |
A28864 | 31. u I. G ▪ p 3. x Thou which teachest another, teachest thou not thy self? |
A28864 | 5ly, This Citie or Towne is the Kings; otherwise how could he put a Commander into it, and give him an Oath to keep it for him? |
A28864 | A Clergie- man, and a Preacher of the Word of God, and altogether for ruine and destruction? |
A28864 | A wonder it is, you had not framed your argument thus: who knows not, that the Parliament caused the Arch Bishop of Canterbury to be beheaded? |
A28864 | Alas, alas, what creatures have you to deale with? |
A28864 | All blind but Mr. Iohn Geree, and his confederacy? |
A28864 | An orderly alteration, or Legall waies of change, who condemnes? |
A28864 | And are not pelf, honour, and preferment the cause of all these fidings, and seditions, in Church, and State? |
A28864 | And can it be denied, that i Melchisedec, Preist of the most high God, was King of Salem, and made so by God himself? |
A28864 | And can ye look to fare better? |
A28864 | And e who may say unto him, What doest thou? |
A28864 | And for the Church, who so fit, who so able to speake as Bishops? |
A28864 | And how must this be done? |
A28864 | And how was that? |
A28864 | And how was that? |
A28864 | And how was this accepted of? |
A28864 | And if he breake this solemne Oath, in his own person, with what conscience can he punish perjurie in others? |
A28864 | And if we reap not your carnall things, how shall we sowe unto you spirituall things? |
A28864 | And is it not reason, that he, who sets the Presbyters on work, should pay them their wages? |
A28864 | And is it not so now? |
A28864 | And is not the silencing of the ten Commandments, for the better oversight and censure of manners? |
A28864 | And is not this, which is wrought against the Clergie, a tyrannous invasion? |
A28864 | And m if the foundation be destroyed, what becomes of the Parliament? |
A28864 | And shall Bishops smart for it, when Lay- men have done the mischief, and purse up the profits? |
A28864 | And shall God or the King forbear to do right, because the multitude murmure at it? |
A28864 | And shall I be ashamed to do the like? |
A28864 | And shall not all these oblige him so much the more to be tender of this Oath? |
A28864 | And then why may they not hang the rest of the Bishops, if their lives prove inconvenient, and prejudiciall to the Church? |
A28864 | And this very Parliament, how oft have they called themselves, The kings great Councell? |
A28864 | And to what purpose was this charge to Timothy, unlesse he were to provide for the Presbyters of his Church? |
A28864 | And was not the crie the same then, that is now? |
A28864 | And was not this priviledge granted, for the grace and favour that f Shesbazzar and g Ezra found in the eyes of those Kings? |
A28864 | And what I pray you, is become of the Lords Supper, x which we are commanded to administer and receive, in remembrance of our B. Saviour? |
A28864 | And what Scholer of worth will desire Orders, when he knows, that by these he shall be exposed to contempt and beggary? |
A28864 | And what are these? |
A28864 | And what is that? |
A28864 | And what''s that? |
A28864 | And who are these men, that have this authority? |
A28864 | And who are these? |
A28864 | And why not now; as well as heretofore? |
A28864 | And why not we? |
A28864 | And why so? |
A28864 | And why so? |
A28864 | And why so? |
A28864 | And why so? |
A28864 | And would you have him to be forsworne, and to neglect that, which by right he ought to make good? |
A28864 | And yet how many lay Chancelours have you subjected us to? |
A28864 | And yet who dares say that the High Priesthood in the old Law was an usurpation? |
A28864 | And yet who dares say, that the Priestood was the cause of those uproars? |
A28864 | And yet why may not I make use of him as well as your fellow Ministers of London? |
A28864 | Are Bishops unfit to advise, or assent in framing Laws? |
A28864 | Are not here the timber and stones of his house, his strong men, and the sons of his loins utterly consumed? |
A28864 | Are not here two Supremacies set up by you; that so you may make the Parliament Law- lesse, and subject to no power? |
A28864 | Are not the later as much theirs, as the purchased lands? |
A28864 | Are not these strong evidences of the Kings Supremacy? |
A28864 | Are they Presbyters onely? |
A28864 | Are they not alike settled by the same Law,& justified alike by the same Law? |
A28864 | Are we dealt with as the Dispensers of Gods high and saving mysteries? |
A28864 | Are we no subjects? |
A28864 | Are we not all Adams sons? |
A28864 | Are we not brethren in Christ? |
A28864 | Are we of the same body; and yet have no priviledges with the body? |
A28864 | Are we so? |
A28864 | Are you of this Realm, or are you not? |
A28864 | Because they are the usuall Preachers, and dispensers of the Sacraments? |
A28864 | Besides, doth not St. Paul justifie, that f none may preach, except they be sent? |
A28864 | Boughen, Edward, 1587?-1660? |
A28864 | Boughen, Edward, 1587?-1660? |
A28864 | But can that be a just power, which deals unjustly? |
A28864 | But e the Parliament is the supreme Court, by which all other Courts are to be regulated: what say we to that? |
A28864 | But from whence comes this defect, or want of maintenance? |
A28864 | But how can that be usurpata, which is data; both usurped, and given? |
A28864 | But how comes it to passe, that if root and branch must up, yet by your Ordinance some branches of that root may be preserved? |
A28864 | But how comes it to passe, that out of this Any of the Kingdome, you conclude against All the Rights of the Clergie? |
A28864 | But how if they deceive the Kings trust, and abuse his confidence? |
A28864 | But how long are these Laws in force? |
A28864 | But how shall he protect us, that is not able to secure himself? |
A28864 | But how shall it be proved, that Episcopacy is so bad, that it is a sin to defend it? |
A28864 | But how shall they learn to govern, that know not how to obey? |
A28864 | But how will you proove, that his Majestie hath sworne to uphold that, which is unjust or impious? |
A28864 | But if these be good; that have indangered their lives to uphold Bishops, what are they, I beseech you, that have spent their blaod to root them out? |
A28864 | But if they do, what then? |
A28864 | But suppose, there were such a Law, as you- speak of, could it be just? |
A28864 | But suppose, they shall make any such grant through ignorance, wilfulnesse, or evill counsell, shall it be of force? |
A28864 | But they have no power to alter: that is in the King; or else, why do they Petition him so to this day, to make such changes good, as they contrive? |
A28864 | But what Office was this, that Timothy and Titus did beare in the Church? |
A28864 | But what are these Rights that you are so eagar to have abrogated? |
A28864 | But what are these priviledges, and duties, whereof they are said to be despoiled? |
A28864 | But what became of him? |
A28864 | But what becomes of this consultation? |
A28864 | But what follows upon this? |
A28864 | But what if the Laws of the Land, what if Magna Charta do oblige all men to stand up for the due observation of these privileges? |
A28864 | But what inconvenience will follow, if we confesse, that the intention of the Oath was changed, with the change of our condition? |
A28864 | But what inconvenience, I pray you, ariseth to the people from the rights and priviledges of the Clergy? |
A28864 | But what is this to prove, that by Christs warrant in Scripture a Presbyter is indued with power to rule in his eongregation? |
A28864 | But what is this to the point in question? |
A28864 | But what is this, that he calls power of Order? |
A28864 | But what makes that So there? |
A28864 | But what''s become of the regular way? |
A28864 | But when was that time? |
A28864 | But wherein is our condition changed? |
A28864 | But wherein is the Kings Oath to the Clergie, inconsistent with his Oath to the people? |
A28864 | But wherein n will the latter Oath be a present breach of the former and so unlawfull? |
A28864 | But who are these Praepositi, these Rulers, here mentioned? |
A28864 | But who did so? |
A28864 | But who were these lands settled upon? |
A28864 | But why am I so carefull to heap up instances? |
A28864 | But why are you so suddenly fallen from an abolition, to an alteration? |
A28864 | But why cheifly? |
A28864 | But why do we o abhor Idols, and commit sacriledge? |
A28864 | But why was this privilege abolisht, as incongruous to their calling? |
A28864 | But why( I pray you) is the question proposed here, when you have determined it before? |
A28864 | But will any wise man take your word for a Law, or imagine it to be more authentick, then the resolutions of all our fore- fathers? |
A28864 | But you must be giving Orders, as well as the Bishop? |
A28864 | But you must be k offering incense, as well as the High Priest? |
A28864 | But, I beseech you, what is the meaning of these words, this will turn pomp into use? |
A28864 | But, I pray you, what Society in Rule, can you chalenge with the Bishops, when by Scripture ye are made subject to them? |
A28864 | But, in sober sadnesse, do you beleeve that the Abrogation of Episcopacy is that, they yawn at? |
A28864 | By a just power, we see, this can not be done; how then shall it be done in a regular way? |
A28864 | By taking Orders? |
A28864 | Can they endure, that their power should be onely derivative, and that from the people? |
A28864 | Damne up the fountain, or divert his course, and what becomes of the river? |
A28864 | Desire you to know, who is the true owner? |
A28864 | Destroy the Father, and how shall the Children be provided for? |
A28864 | Do not you go about to make the Word of God a lye, while you endeavour to dis- inherit the Clergie of these privileges and honors? |
A28864 | Do the people use to make Laws in a Monarchie? |
A28864 | Does not your own Mr. Edwards professe, that never was there such plenty of Sects and Heresies? |
A28864 | Doth it truly and justly agree with the Word of God; at least, not contradict it? |
A28864 | Fed with an Ordinance, with words; but where''s the fift part? |
A28864 | For are not these your words, that the change of the Clergies condition must needs change the intention of the Oath? |
A28864 | For do not the Houses at this day Petition His Majestie, to make that a Law which they have voted? |
A28864 | For do not you say plainly, that t there''s a Supremacie in the King, and a Supremacy in the Parliament? |
A28864 | For do not you say thus? |
A28864 | For do not you say ▪ that your second Ant ● gonist plainly ● ffi ● ms, that the King can not desert Episcopacy without flat perjury? |
A28864 | For do not you tell us, that b ther''s a Supremacie in the King, and a Supremacie in the Parliament? |
A28864 | For doth not S. Paul command Timothy, to y withdraw himself from those, that teach unwholsome Doctrine? |
A28864 | For doth not our Saviour say, b He that receiveth whomsoever I send, receiveth me? |
A28864 | For doth not your Title page speak thus? |
A28864 | For how many of you have been instituted into Benefices by lay Chancelours? |
A28864 | For o who may say unto him, what doest thou? |
A28864 | For what have the Clergie besides their Orders, priviledges, and immunities; besides their Jurisdiction and revenues? |
A28864 | From abrogation to alteration? |
A28864 | Hath he forfeited it? |
A28864 | Hath he resigned it? |
A28864 | Hath not Mr. Geree set you in the sleep way to ruine? |
A28864 | Hath not all been done by tumults, and insurrections? |
A28864 | Have not they done wrong? |
A28864 | Have we forgot that? |
A28864 | Have we some privileges, that the Laity have not? |
A28864 | Have you a desire to know, what true justice is? |
A28864 | Have you not alreadie dis- roabed them of their honors? |
A28864 | Have you not made them house- lesse, harbourlesse, not able to keep a servant? |
A28864 | Have you not plundred their houses, and seized their Lands? |
A28864 | Here was wrong done; But to whom, think you? |
A28864 | How came you to spie this foule mistake? |
A28864 | How can he then disclaime this Oath? |
A28864 | How comes this to passe? |
A28864 | How if they break the Lawfull Circle, and transgresse the Customs of Parliament? |
A28864 | How like you this, my rich Masters of London? |
A28864 | How like you this? |
A28864 | How many have been inforced to flye with all secrecy from Westminster, because they would not passe their Vo ● es against Law and conscience? |
A28864 | How oft have the Kings of this Realm ingaged themselves to observe Magna Charta, and to maintain the rights and liberties of the Church? |
A28864 | How prove you that? |
A28864 | How then can I give away Gods inheritance to the Edomites& Ishmalites, lest perchance they enter forcibly upon it? |
A28864 | How then can he desert them, or leave them out of his protection? |
A28864 | How then can he infringe this Oath? |
A28864 | How then did we forfeit g our birth- right? |
A28864 | How then must he attain the Priesthood? |
A28864 | How then shall he treat in Parliament with those, that have no being? |
A28864 | How then? |
A28864 | How? |
A28864 | How? |
A28864 | How? |
A28864 | How? |
A28864 | I beseech you, do you dream? |
A28864 | I. G. p. 9. n I. G. p. 9. o If the King should be peremptory in deniall, what help would this be to them? |
A28864 | If He be the onely Supreme, how shall we find another Supreme, or an equall to him within his own Dominions? |
A28864 | If all ● ffi ● es must be discarded, because the officers have done a misse, what office will remain in this Kingdom? |
A28864 | If he hath power, where is it? |
A28864 | If his Majestie have endeavoured to do that, which is right, what are they, that have hindered him from doing it? |
A28864 | If it be a sin, and an heinous sin, c how then can I commit this great wickednesse, and sin against God? |
A28864 | If it be, why are you so zealous, to distinguish us and our privileges, from the people and their priviledges? |
A28864 | If one be abolished, why may not the other be removed? |
A28864 | If then all these and many more are peculiar to Soveraignty, what is left for the Parliament? |
A28864 | If then it be Treason to slay the Prelate, what sin is it to murder Prelacy? |
A28864 | If there be no Prelates, where''s the treatie? |
A28864 | If this Governour now surrender this Towne upon composition, doth he violate his Oath? |
A28864 | In at subjection, out at immunities? |
A28864 | In at taxes, out at privileges? |
A28864 | Inconsistent with the Kings Oath to the people? |
A28864 | Indeed a if it were all one member, where were the body? |
A28864 | Indeed i he makes a wonder, that any man should doubt of it; For how can the Office be maintained without means? |
A28864 | Indeed you say that, which is equivalent; for are not these your words; g He can not now deny consent( to their abolition) without sin? |
A28864 | Is Episcopacy bad, because Gregory VII ▪ of Rome, George of Cappadocia, or Paulus Samosatenus abused their place and function? |
A28864 | Is it equall then, I beseech you, to ingage the lives of some, to destroy the honour and estate of others? |
A28864 | Is it no sin? |
A28864 | Is it not enough by this extirpation to barre your selves from heaven, unlesse ye sink your posteritie into the same damnation? |
A28864 | Is it not enough to murder Priests, unlesse ye slay the Priestood also? |
A28864 | Is it not fit, that we should all have share, and share like, as had the children of Israel in the land of promise? |
A28864 | Is it to sit in the House of Peers? |
A28864 | Is not the case put right? |
A28864 | Is not this a flat contradiction? |
A28864 | Is not this as Philo Judaeus hath it, to x make God a shelter for our wickednesse, and to cast our sin upon him? |
A28864 | Is not this flatly against the Oath of Supremacy? |
A28864 | Is not this that sacra fames, that sacred hunger, which is so greedy of all that is called sacred? |
A28864 | Is not this the blessing they have gained by that hideous and senselesse out- cry? |
A28864 | Is not this the crying sinne, the grand Monopolie of these times? |
A28864 | Is not this the way to lead in Jeroboams Priests; to fill the Pulpits with the scum of the people, and to bring the Priesthood into utter contempt? |
A28864 | Is not this to c blaspheme the footsteps of the Lords anointed? |
A28864 | Is not this to cast aside not onely a fore- head, but all conscience, and the fear of God? |
A28864 | Is not this to question the actions of those Saints d to whom the Faith was first delivered? |
A28864 | Is perjurie a sin, or no sin? |
A28864 | Is the Apostleship naught, because Judas abused himself and that? |
A28864 | Is the Kings O ● ● h, or Episcopacy, or the abr ● ga ● i ● n of Episcopacy but a circumstance? |
A28864 | Is the Ministery Lawfull, or no? |
A28864 | Is there no danger of sacriledge in robbing father and mother? |
A28864 | Is this Justice? |
A28864 | Is this any thing to the Church? |
A28864 | Is this equalitie? |
A28864 | Is this gratitude? |
A28864 | Is this possible? |
A28864 | Is this the fashion, first to resolve, and then to argue the case? |
A28864 | Is this the way to invite men of worth, to incorporate themselves into your Presbyteriall Hierarchie? |
A28864 | Is this to be good? |
A28864 | Is this to be just? |
A28864 | King and subject, Preist, and people, composers, approvers, takers, all dimme- sighted? |
A28864 | Mark that: are we not all, both spirituall and temporall, bound to maintain each others privileges, as much as in us lies? |
A28864 | Nay who shall beget children of the Church, when she is void of an Husband? |
A28864 | Nay, are we so well dealt with as the lowest members of this Nation? |
A28864 | Next, when the Church is stripped of her means, what kinde of Clergie shall we have? |
A28864 | No danger in the subversion of the Church? |
A28864 | No danger? |
A28864 | One body Politick? |
A28864 | Or, if you will, for their personall worth? |
A28864 | Others are content to Covenant, Vote, or do any thing to save their own stakes; For to what purpose were it for them to withstand? |
A28864 | Otherwise what strange confusion must necessarily have overspread the face of the Church, if this distinction had not been religiously preserved? |
A28864 | Quo quid ab surdius dici potest? |
A28864 | Shall she not in their absence be layed open to the subtill foxes, and mercilesse bores to wast and distroy her? |
A28864 | Sir, will you keep Peace and godly agreement entirely( according to your power) both to God and the Holy Church, the Clergie and the people? |
A28864 | Sir, will you( to your power) cause Law, Justice, and Discretion in mercie, and truth to be executed in all your Judgments? |
A28864 | Suppose, the Bishops were faulty, shall God be turned out of his possessions, because his servants are to blame? |
A28864 | Take these away, and what becomes of the Sacraments? |
A28864 | That abrogation is the repealing, the disanulling of a Law; and not the changing of it? |
A28864 | The Bishop is the ministeriall Spouse of the Church: how then can the Church be protected, if her husband be taken from her, or stripped of his means? |
A28864 | The Bishop your father, and the Church your mother? |
A28864 | The Bishops wealth, honor, and miters were your aim; these you have preached for, these you have fought for; what would you more? |
A28864 | The Law of God we confesse to be the Supreme Law? |
A28864 | The first is this, e If any can not rule his own house, how shall he take care for the Church? |
A28864 | The peoples Laws? |
A28864 | The question is, d Whether the King, notwithstanding his oath, may consent with a safe conscience, to the abrogation of Episcopacy? |
A28864 | Their Laws? |
A28864 | Thou, that preachest, a man should not steal, doest thou steal? |
A28864 | Thus far Mr. Gerees question: what think you of it? |
A28864 | To his subjects? |
A28864 | To what purpose then are those words; d The abrogation will be just, as well as legall, there will be no injury done? |
A28864 | To whom? |
A28864 | To whose hands then should I chiefly present it, but to Yours? |
A28864 | To whose trust were these committed? |
A28864 | Was it forgotten? |
A28864 | Was it settled by Christ, or no? |
A28864 | Was not that provided for this State? |
A28864 | Was not this as fair a pretence as yours, or as any you can invent? |
A28864 | Was not this to turn impediments into helps? |
A28864 | Was the first sworn in truth, and judgement, and righteousnesse? |
A28864 | We have the same right; and why not the same protection? |
A28864 | Well, what kinde of Government was there in the primitive Church? |
A28864 | Well, what then? |
A28864 | Were they not removed, to make way for these civill broils? |
A28864 | Were they not thrust out, lest the King should have too many faithfull Counsellors in the House? |
A28864 | What Law is there to countenance, what of late yeares hath been done against us? |
A28864 | What did it? |
A28864 | What difference, I pray you, between lands, purchased by the society of Goldsmiths, and such as are freely given to that Company? |
A28864 | What have ye fought for? |
A28864 | What if I should tell you, that you have altered the state of the question? |
A28864 | What if a man should say, that this assertion is not true? |
A28864 | What if any shall make an unjust Law, a Law without equity? |
A28864 | What is become of it? |
A28864 | What is to be done in this case? |
A28864 | What may we then think of an oath taken with such high Solemnity? |
A28864 | What mean you by circumstance? |
A28864 | What multitudes are there in this Kingdom, that mourn and grieve to see Religion so opprest, so trampled on, and almost breathing out her last? |
A28864 | What reason can you give, why that should suffer, that can not erre; that never offended? |
A28864 | What say you to that memorable convention at Auspurg, where met all, or most of the learned, that endeavoured the Reformation? |
A28864 | What say you to that principle of reason, l Propter quod aliquid est tale, illud est magis tale? |
A28864 | What shall now become of your Case of Conscience? |
A28864 | What then becomes of that Church, where there is no Bishop? |
A28864 | What then shall become of the people? |
A28864 | What would you more? |
A28864 | What, because Presbyters offer up the prayers and supplications of the Church? |
A28864 | What, for this cause? |
A28864 | What, two Supremacies, two superlatives, at the same time, in the same Kingdom? |
A28864 | What? |
A28864 | What? |
A28864 | What? |
A28864 | What? |
A28864 | What? |
A28864 | What? |
A28864 | What? |
A28864 | What? |
A28864 | What? |
A28864 | When did we ever desire, or perswade his Majestie, to do the least injurie to people, or Parliament? |
A28864 | When was this Oath, I beseech you, framed? |
A28864 | Whence is it then, that the Bishops are thrust out of the House of Peers; and that none of us may vote, or sit in the House of Commons? |
A28864 | Where is the orderly alteration, you speak of? |
A28864 | Where the Parliament? |
A28864 | Where then are the two Supremacies, which we erect? |
A28864 | Where then is the Parliaments Supremacy? |
A28864 | Where then is the Writ? |
A28864 | Where then is their Supreme power? |
A28864 | Where under pretence of the Common good, they ingrosse all into their own clutches? |
A28864 | Who dare then after this foundation? |
A28864 | Who made them makers ▪ or Masters of the Laws? |
A28864 | Who then dares say, they ought not, or shall not? |
A28864 | Who then shall obey? |
A28864 | Who told you, that His Majestie had condescended to this impious and Antichristian demand? |
A28864 | Why doest thou call a Parliament at this time, and not at that? |
A28864 | Why doest thou honour this man, and not that? |
A28864 | Why doth Q. Elizabeth call them l a great State of this Kingdome, if they be no State at all? |
A28864 | Why rob we God, as if he were an Idol, not sensible of these wrongs, nor able to revenge them? |
A28864 | Why then are our Rights and Liberties so strook at, and exposed to contempt and sale? |
A28864 | Why then are they called Peers; when they are not so much as Peers to the people, but their substitutes, if not servants? |
A28864 | Why then do you perswade the King to break his oath? |
A28864 | Why, what''s become of the Oath of Supremacy? |
A28864 | Why? |
A28864 | Will not our Church then come to a sweet passe? |
A28864 | Will you hear the motives? |
A28864 | With what face then can we fall back, and wilfully incurre perjury? |
A28864 | With what face then can you say, that the Kings Oath to the Clergie can not be consistent with the priviledges of the Nation? |
A28864 | Would you have all these, or onely some of these abolished? |
A28864 | YOu Object, and we confesse, that a this oath to the Clergie, must not be intended in a sense, inconsistent with the Kings Oath to the people? |
A28864 | You and your great contrivers, what have ye laboured for, all this while? |
A28864 | again fallen from the question? |
A28864 | and d slander the footsteps of those anointed of the Lord, that have so long slept in peace? |
A28864 | c Why should this Shimei blaspheme my Lord the King? |
A28864 | e Whose legall priviledges, or rights have we invaded, or sought after? |
A28864 | leg ● 1. y Quid i ● ● â caecitate tenebrosius, ad obtinendam inanissimam gloriam, errorem hominis aucupari,& Deum testē in corde contemnere? |
A28864 | or both? |
A28864 | or left out on set purpose? |
A28864 | or to Vate in the House of Peers? |
A28864 | or was it not? |
A28864 | r If we have sown unto you spirituall things, is it a great matter if we reap your carnall things? |
A28864 | so satisfactory and yet not hold? |
A28864 | some branches lopped off, and some spared; is this according to your solemne league and Covenant? |
A28864 | talke we of Levelling? |
A28864 | to so many lay Committees in the City; to so many in every Countie? |
A28864 | valid in Law, though injurious? |
A28864 | what have ye shed so much blood for? |
A28864 | which of our wives have had that justly payed them? |
A28864 | z Quid si a liquis condat jus iniquum? |
A28864 | ● 15. l An ● was not here ● ● urpation against Gods direction? |
A60479 | ''T Is true, our Nostrils lost their Breath; What then?'' |
A60479 | ''T is madnesse to use Candles in the day: What need a Parl''ament? |
A60479 | 1. Who then ought to have the Militia but the King? |
A60479 | 2. challengeth his praerogative; And the Lord God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou? |
A60479 | 24. speaking of Liberties, and who had power to give them, Quis? |
A60479 | An fortuna regit manibus dans munera caecis? |
A60479 | An ● what? |
A60479 | And Pearls? |
A60479 | And can any wise man think that this kingdom thus divided can stand? |
A60479 | And can this divided Monster( which is the cause of all our divisions) cloze up our divisions, and settle our Nation in peace and happinesse? |
A60479 | And how shall I hold that which is not to be found? |
A60479 | And shall we cast thy prayer behind our backs, and presume to come before thee without it? |
A60479 | And was he adjudged an Enemy to Parliaments, and an Infringer of their freedoms? |
A60479 | And what Tyrant ever was there who did not shed mans blood? |
A60479 | And what greater pretence have they had for their actions, than to say, that the King was not the Supreme Governour over his Subjects? |
A60479 | And what is the House of Commons, a God? |
A60479 | And what lawes of any Nation in the world, did ever maintain the liberty and freedome of the people, more than the Kings Lawes of England? |
A60479 | And what? |
A60479 | And why might not he turn out them by force, who by force had already turned out the King, Lords, and all the Commons, besides themselves? |
A60479 | And will these oaths be kept? |
A60479 | Are your Commandments above his? |
A60479 | Art born a bondman? |
A60479 | Art opprest with sickness? |
A60479 | Art thou become a surety? |
A60479 | Art thou contemned? |
A60479 | Art thou poor and over- burdened with children? |
A60479 | Art thou rich and childness? |
A60479 | Art thou shut up in an unworthy prison? |
A60479 | Art thou subject to a Tyrant? |
A60479 | At quo cymba? |
A60479 | At quo musae Procax? |
A60479 | Be''t by thy fire, If I in fire must fry? |
A60479 | Be''t by thy fire, if I in fire must fry? |
A60479 | But O that we were made Judges in the Land, how equally and impartially would we give justice to all men? |
A60479 | But as once it was demanded of an Oraaor; speaking very much in the commendation of Hercules, Quis vituperavit? |
A60479 | But get thee behind me, Dagon, what hast thou to do with peace? |
A60479 | But if all his Lands escheat, by what Law do they detain and keep the Queens Dower from her? |
A60479 | But if the Commons when they sit in the House have the Soveraign power, where was it before their Sessions? |
A60479 | But may any private hand stick this wild boar? |
A60479 | But suppose all men were born free by nature, and that the people originally by nature had power to chuse a King? |
A60479 | But to whom must he give his account? |
A60479 | But was not this Soveraignty personally fixed in Adam, and so dyed with him? |
A60479 | But what was their reason to abolish Kingship? |
A60479 | But what, doth God give power to Kings to take away mens lives and estates unjustly? |
A60479 | But what, is this all? |
A60479 | But when Adam fell, did not his Soveraignty fall with him? |
A60479 | But wherefore do I say we? |
A60479 | But wherefore should I make my self ridiculous, in attempting to prove that which no age hath denied? |
A60479 | But whether now my Muse, where wilt thou croud? |
A60479 | But whither now my Boat? |
A60479 | But why art thou cast down, O my soul, or why art thou disquieted within me? |
A60479 | But why do I cite David Had not all the Kings in the Scripture, nay, hav ● not all the Kings in the world the chief powe ● over their Militia? |
A60479 | But why hath the King no Peer in his Kingdome? |
A60479 | But why should I blur my paper with the Description of this deceitfull Parliament, the Theory whereof, is become practical almost in every City? |
A60479 | But why should I seek stars to light the noon day? |
A60479 | But why should I speak of Law, to those who God and all the World knows Act all things against law? |
A60479 | But you must adde the sacred blood of Kings? |
A60479 | But you will ask me then, How can Mr. Prynne be clear from the guilt of blasphemy? |
A60479 | By what Law, did I say? |
A60479 | By what authority? |
A60479 | Can any man but Mr. Prynne forge such a consequence? |
A60479 | Can fish live in the air? |
A60479 | Can not God who permitteth these Rebels to reign, as easily cast them down? |
A60479 | Can the Almighty be so passionate? |
A60479 | Can you do these things and look upwards? |
A60479 | Can you put asunder, that which Jehovah hath joyned together? |
A60479 | Can you scale the heavens, and subdue the Almighty? |
A60479 | Cause we sinn''d once, shall''s ne''re be good agen? |
A60479 | Children are riches, then how canst thou be poor, amongst so many jewels? |
A60479 | Could not David have cut off S ● uls head, when he cut off the lap of his Garment? |
A60479 | Could not our Saviour have had more than twelve Legions of Angles, to have repelled the fury of his persecutors? |
A60479 | Could the Almighty suffer this? |
A60479 | Could the betrothed do this? |
A60479 | Did ever the world produce such blind prodigious Monsters? |
A60479 | Did the King demand five treacherous Members of the Parliament, whom the Law would have condemned guilty of high Treason? |
A60479 | Did the people foist up again the Rump of the long Parliamene? |
A60479 | Did the people sanctifie the Committee of Safety over them? |
A60479 | Did the people set up Oliver Protector? |
A60479 | Did the people turn out Dick his son? |
A60479 | Did the people turn out the long Parliament? |
A60479 | Did they ever hear of him? |
A60479 | Did thy harvest miss, and thy land lye barren one year? |
A60479 | Do this? |
A60479 | Do thy people hate thee their Soveraign? |
A60479 | Dost not thou know what we want better than our selves? |
A60479 | Dost thou complain that promisses made unto thee, are late in performance? |
A60479 | Dost thou doubt my fatherly indulgence? |
A60479 | Dost thou dwell in a narrow little house? |
A60479 | Dost thou fear thou shalt lose the victory? |
A60479 | Dost thou imagine it an easy thing to rule? |
A60479 | Dost thou mourn because thou didst narrowly escape shipwrack? |
A60479 | Dost thou suffer an hard Father? |
A60479 | Dost thou think it will carry thee to Heaven? |
A60479 | Dost thou weep for the death of thy son? |
A60479 | Doth poverty knock at thy door? |
A60479 | Durst you encounter the Almighty, pitch battail, and sight against his Deity? |
A60479 | Eloquar? |
A60479 | Exilio pellor injusto R. Quid tu igitur justo pelli malles exilio? |
A60479 | Feign that the people did intrust the King with his Royal Office, yet why should it escheat to these Hypocrites? |
A60479 | Finge datos currus, quid ages? |
A60479 | For Rulers are not a Terrour to good works, but to the evil; wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? |
A60479 | For art thou only a stranger in England, and hast not known the things which are come to pass there in these dayes? |
A60479 | For by what authority was this Individuam vagum, the Keepers, erected? |
A60479 | For do we not until this day praise and honour their Martyrdom? |
A60479 | For he is accountable to none but unto the Lord, who will require it as his due; For the Lord called unto Adam, and said unto him, where art thou? |
A60479 | For hear what Bodine saith, O how many Tyrants should there be, If it should be lawfull for subjects to kill their Soveraigns though Tyrants? |
A60479 | For if every one of the three estate, or but two of them hath power to make Laws, who should be the Subjects to obey them, or who could give the Law? |
A60479 | For is there any Law which maketh it high Treason in the King, if he commit such or such an offence? |
A60479 | For my part, I think he had betrer be hanged; for what beast is more Salvage and uncertain, than the headlesse blind multitude? |
A60479 | For now they shall say, we have no King, because we feared not the Lord; What then should a King do unto us? |
A60479 | For the liberty of the people: For what cause do they enslave the whole Nation? |
A60479 | For what is above the King? |
A60479 | For what villany so great as for Subjects to murther their gracious King? |
A60479 | For when Pilate said, Behold your King, shall I Crucify your King? |
A60479 | For who can say any thing is his own? |
A60479 | For who can stretch forth his hand against the Lords anointed, and be guiltless? |
A60479 | For who was it that murthered the King? |
A60479 | For why? |
A60479 | For why? |
A60479 | For — Q ● is talia fan do Mrmidonum, Dolopumve, aut duri miles Vlyssis, Temperet a lacrymis? |
A60479 | For, Quid Jove majus habetur? |
A60479 | For, if you ask them, for what cause did they murder the King? |
A60479 | God save the King Adonijah? |
A60479 | Haec facere Jason potuit? |
A60479 | Hast not thou commanded us not to use vain repetitions; But when we pray, to pray thus, Our Father,& c? |
A60479 | Hast thou a malapert wife? |
A60479 | Hast thou a rebellious Son? |
A60479 | Hast thou an unruly proud scholar? |
A60479 | Hast thou buried thy wife? |
A60479 | Hast thou lost a Tyranny? |
A60479 | Hast thou lost an occasion to revenge? |
A60479 | Hast thou lost thy betrothed mistress? |
A60479 | Hast thou lost thy mony? |
A60479 | Hast thou lost thy time? |
A60479 | Hast thou many enemies? |
A60479 | Hath Infamy blasted thy name? |
A60479 | Hath nature made thee deformed? |
A60479 | Hath not he in his Vpper- house constituted a King, and commanded you to honor, and obey him? |
A60479 | Hath the King banished thee? |
A60479 | Hath thy dying Mother forsaken thee? |
A60479 | Hath thy friend forsaken thee? |
A60479 | Have not they by their unjust punishments received greater rewards of praise, than if they had unjustly rebelled? |
A60479 | Have they the Majesty, because they have no honour or dignity but by the Kings gift? |
A60479 | Have thy subjects betrayd thee? |
A60479 | He wished that his people had but one neck, that he might chop them off at a blow, vox Carnifice quam Imperatore dignior? |
A60479 | Heu quis primus, adhuc gemmus latuisse volentes, Pondera&( illecibras vitiorum) protulit auri? |
A60479 | His Disciples did I say? |
A60479 | How could they, did I say? |
A60479 | How dare the men then of our age, blaspheme God, even in their pulpits? |
A60479 | How do our houses burn with lust? |
A60479 | How long shall your Sanctuary be made a Stable and Den for Thieves? |
A60479 | How men are taken with their own shadows? |
A60479 | How much more then may they be taxed with foolery, who call other mens Lands after their own names and think they shall enjoy them for ever? |
A60479 | How shall we sing the Lords song in a strange Land? |
A60479 | I would have you to know, saith he, That I can do any thing, a true Character of a Tyrant, for what will not hee do? |
A60479 | If any of us offend the King, thou mayest correct us, but if thou shalt exceed, who shall correct thee? |
A60479 | If he repent, why doth he not write a book of retractations? |
A60479 | If it be Tyranny for one man to govern according to his will? |
A60479 | If so? |
A60479 | If such thy will, and I deserve the same, Thou chief of Gods, Why sleeps thy vengefull flame? |
A60479 | If the Law be equal in power with the king, then why doth the king pardon those, whom the Law condemneth, alter the old Laws, and make new Laws? |
A60479 | If the opinions of the Spencers were so wicked, and detestable, what then are the actions of the Rebells of our age? |
A60479 | If the subjects are not his inferours, why should they obey? |
A60479 | If this be thy pleasure, and my deserts, Why sleep thy thunderbolts? |
A60479 | In that same time said the King to the Multitude, Are ye come out as against a thief, with swords and staves, for to take me? |
A60479 | Is it fit to say to a King thou art wicked? |
A60479 | Is it fit to say to a King, thou art wicked, and to Princes, ye are ungodly? |
A60479 | Is it fit to say to a King, thou art wicked, and to Princes, ye are ungodly? |
A60479 | Is it lawfull to call thee a Man? |
A60479 | Is it not because the Lord hath anointed thee to be Captain over his Inheritance? |
A60479 | Is it not only because the King doth? |
A60479 | Is there any Antidote against Caesar? |
A60479 | Is there any other spirit to teach us to pray, than the Spirit of the Lord, which taught us in his Gospel? |
A60479 | Is thy fare thine? |
A60479 | Is thy friend dead? |
A60479 | It is their Counsel to advise, not their power to authorize, which the King requireth; For why? |
A60479 | It was the Presbyterians who first Clouded? |
A60479 | Jam caelum terramque Dei sine numine, venti Miscere,& tantas audetis tollere moles? |
A60479 | Lingua velut gustu vario, sic gaudet habere In studiis mens nostra vices: mutabile quid non? |
A60479 | May we not resist him? |
A60479 | Must the King give an account only of himself? |
A60479 | My Chariot had, can thy frail strength ascend The obvious poles,& with their force contend? |
A60479 | Nay, suppose the Father should draw his sword at his Son, would that be a just ground for him presently to run in upon his Father and stab him? |
A60479 | No Militia, no King; For how can he defend himself and Kingdome without it? |
A60479 | No action lyeth against him; For who can command the King? |
A60479 | Non tentare levi( vetitum scelus) aequora ligno, Quid vero vetitum nos culpae fertilis aetas Fugimus? |
A60479 | Nonne oportet Deo magis obedire, quam hominibus? |
A60479 | Not that dread Thunderer, who rules above, Can drive these wheels: and who more great than Jove? |
A60479 | Notes for div A60479-e12550 Quid prodest tibi nomen usurpare alie ● um& vocari quod non es? |
A60479 | Notes for div A60479-e1490* — Nam quis iniqui Tam patiens orbis, tam ferreus ut teneat se? |
A60479 | Now if Reason, and the Judgement of our Ancestors, would satisfie our frenzy upstarts, what greater authority would they have? |
A60479 | O God why hast thou cast us off for ever? |
A60479 | O King, with what terms of honour shall I style thee? |
A60479 | O fortuna potens, quam variabilis, Tantum juris atrox quae tibi vindicas, Evertisque bonos, erigis improbos? |
A60479 | O monstrous, did you ever hear of any Law in the whole world, that ever the King could commit high Treason? |
A60479 | O purblind City, how long will you enslave yourselves to ravenous woolves? |
A60479 | O quam te m ● morem virgo? |
A60479 | Or can fowls live in the Sea? |
A60479 | Or did they hunt in the Rump again? |
A60479 | Or did they hunt them out again? |
A60479 | Or have they made all the Revolutions and Choppings, and Changings amongst us? |
A60479 | Or where is Oliver the Tyrant? |
A60479 | Or who from sacred Altars spoil refrains? |
A60479 | Or who shall cure the evil of the People? |
A60479 | Or, that thou shalt always reign secure there? |
A60479 | Ought we not to obey God rather than man? |
A60479 | QVis furor O populus, quae tanta licentia ferri? |
A60479 | Que enim est respublica ubi Ecclesiastici primum non habeant locum in Comitiis,& publicis de salute Reipub: Deliberationibus? |
A60479 | Quid nos dura refugimus Aetas? |
A60479 | Quin etiam Caroli rubefecit tela nefanda Dirus post genit is sangnis? |
A60479 | R. An te rex expulit? |
A60479 | Regni sacra fames quid non morialia pectora cogis? |
A60479 | Samuel took a vyal of Oil, and poured it on his head: But the Lord anointed him King, he is the Lords anointed, not Samuels: For why? |
A60479 | Shall I speak? |
A60479 | Shall the Commons have a Negative voyce, who are most of them Tradesmen, and not educated in the Law, but in Mechanick handy- crafts? |
A60479 | Shall your Streets blush with the blood of Prophets, and with the blood of your Cit ● zens, and will not you change your colour? |
A60479 | Si plaoet hoc, meruique, quid O tua fulmina cessant Summe Deum? |
A60479 | Si pretium mortis, vel reges morte petuntur: Talis honor regum? |
A60479 | Si quis de nobis, O Rex, Justitiae tramites transcendere voluerit, a te corripi potest, si tu vero excesseris, quis te corripiet? |
A60479 | So it may be demanded of me, treating of the Kings Soveraignty, who hath brought arguments against it? |
A60479 | Some Letters, nay some words are left out, and wrong ones put in their room: What then? |
A60479 | Suppose thy request granted thee, and thou got up into my Chariot, what wouldst thou do? |
A60479 | Surely, nothing is more certain; otherwise, what difference would there be between the King and Subject? |
A60479 | Tantaene animis caelestibus irae? |
A60479 | Tantane vos generis tenuit fiducia Vestri? |
A60479 | The King and the Power to command are Individua, He is a Clout, no King, which can not command; And who should be under his command? |
A60479 | The King fell, and why should not I? |
A60479 | The Rural parts are turn''d into a den of savage men; And where''s a City from all vice so free, But may be term''d the worst of all the three? |
A60479 | Their answer is, for the liberty of the people: For what cause do they make themselves Governours, and Lords and Masters over all that we have? |
A60479 | Then how could the King sin, when there was no Law for him to transgress? |
A60479 | Then saith Pilate unto him, Speakest thou not unto me? |
A60479 | Therefore how can the King offend against the Laws of the people, or be obnoxious to them, when they never gave him any Laws to keep, or transgresse? |
A60479 | Therefore who can say unto the"King, what dost thou? |
A60479 | Therfore rouze up Citizens, and take courage; How long will you be the common Hackney, to be ridden by every one that will stride you? |
A60479 | This is the Popes Doctrine, to take away the lives of Princes; and ● re not we his true Disciples, when we put his words in practice? |
A60479 | Thou knewest thou shouldest get a mortal Son, and dost thou now repent it? |
A60479 | Thus when we have received our gracious Soveraign, from his long unnatural banishment, what then can the Lord do more for us, that he hath not done? |
A60479 | Vusti quoque Rector Olympi, Qui fera terribili jaculatur fulmina dextra, Non agit hos curros: Et quid Jove majus habetur? |
A60479 | Was ever God and Christ robbed so much of their Power, Honour and Majesty as by these Vipers? |
A60479 | Was it the people? |
A60479 | Was there ever such a jugling deceit acted by any Jugglers or Quacksalvers in the world? |
A60479 | We blush at scars receiv''d, sinne, brothers fall, Vile age what mischief do we shun at all? |
A60479 | What Tyrant more bloudy than Nero? |
A60479 | What Tyrant more savage and cruel than Nebuchadnezzar? |
A60479 | What art thou robbed of all that thou hast? |
A60479 | What doth it hang in the Clouds, and drop on them when they sit, and dissolve like the Snow with the VVinter, when the King dissolveth them? |
A60479 | What doth not gold, more sacred to them than their oathes, compel mortals to atchieve? |
A60479 | What doth not the thirst of ruling compell these mortals to do? |
A60479 | What greater exemplification, confirmation or demonstration of the kings Soveraignty, can there be than this Sacred Oath of Supremacy? |
A60479 | What hadst thou rather than be justly banished? |
A60479 | What hand so wilfully audacious? |
A60479 | What is Magna Charta but the Kings will, and gift? |
A60479 | What is an Act of Parliament, but the will of the King, Nay what is Magna Charta, but a Roy le veilt? |
A60479 | What is it then to have, or have no wife, But single thraldome, or a double strife? |
A60479 | What is the reason, that it is a Law that the King can not make new or alter old Laws, but in Parliament with the consent of his Lords and Commons? |
A60479 | What madnesse O people, O people what licentious fury possesseth your earthly Cottages? |
A60479 | What man then, so impudently wicked? |
A60479 | What sins then are we guilty of, who not only provoke our King to anger, but quench his anger with his own bloud? |
A60479 | What sweetnesse is there in Crowns, which makes you so earnest to wear them? |
A60479 | What then remains? |
A60479 | What then? |
A60479 | What then? |
A60479 | What then? |
A60479 | What though a man be born blinde, and so continue from his birth to his death? |
A60479 | What though cross gales drive us from our intended Haven? |
A60479 | What will it profit a man to enjoy the whole world to day, and lose his own soul to morrow? |
A60479 | What youth his hands for fear of gods contains? |
A60479 | What? |
A60479 | What? |
A60479 | Where is Alexander the great? |
A60479 | Where is Julius Caesar the Usurper? |
A60479 | Where is Mr. Prynns almighty Parliament now? |
A60479 | Where the word of a King is, there is power, and who may say unto him what d ● st thou? |
A60479 | Where the word of a King is, there is power, and who may say unto him, what dost thou? |
A60479 | Who can contradict what they said? |
A60479 | Who can sufficiently celebrate the fame of those worthy Martyrs, who unjustly suffered for Religion, under the Government of Queen Mary? |
A60479 | Who first found Gold? |
A60479 | Who made them Princes and Judges over us? |
A60479 | Who shall now cure the Kings evil? |
A60479 | Who then can think upon our late most graciour King Charls the Martyr, without Tears in his Eyes, and contrition in his heart? |
A60479 | Who were the fi ● st that brought their private wealth For publick Treasure,& as''t were by stealth Made that the lure to sin? |
A60479 | Who? |
A60479 | Why did they not give the superiority to the Knaves? |
A60479 | Why is he not then called King of single men? |
A60479 | Why not? |
A60479 | Why preach you up your selves the maintainers of the Law so much? |
A60479 | Why should it not be far greater Tyranny for a multitude of men to govern, how they please, without being accountable, or restrained by Law? |
A60479 | Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? |
A60479 | Would not it be a most hideous and detestable thing for a son to murder his own Father? |
A60479 | Yee Guardian Angels of this once blest Land Have you still for our good the same command? |
A60479 | Yet since with sorrow here we live opprest, What life is best? |
A60479 | Yet with what earnest expressions did the Prophet Jeremiah exhort the people to obey him, threatning them with utter destruction for their Rebellion? |
A60479 | a General without souldiers? |
A60479 | a Warriour without arms? |
A60479 | after what manner, or how is it possible for them to make their choice? |
A60479 | an Sileam? |
A60479 | an Tyrannus? |
A60479 | an hostis? |
A60479 | an populus? |
A60479 | an tu ipse? |
A60479 | and by what means can the King rule, and direct his people, if he hath not the supreme power over the Laws? |
A60479 | and can your Mortal nothings in the Lower- house( next door to hell) vote him useless? |
A60479 | and can your Statutes repeal his? |
A60479 | and hast thou not prescribed us a set form of prayer to ask it with? |
A60479 | and how could he levy war, without lawes to direct, and guide his Arms? |
A60479 | and our Chambers with pride and wantonnesse, whilest the streets blush with the blood of Prophets? |
A60479 | and shall not we? |
A60479 | and shall not we? |
A60479 | and shall we murder the King? |
A60479 | and take away not only the Crown, but the life also of your dread Soveraign? |
A60479 | and then how can the people punish him, who never offended their Laws? |
A60479 | and to Princes, ye are ungodly? |
A60479 | and what book so much abūsed as his? |
A60479 | and what greater treason was ever hatched and plotted against any man than him? |
A60479 | and what made Job so famous, as his miseries? |
A60479 | and where is it when they are dissolved? |
A60479 | and who now so Ridiculous, and Scorned? |
A60479 | anne parum dii percivilia bella Flumina& arva pio procerum tinxisse cruore? |
A60479 | are the pots greater than the Potter? |
A60479 | are we wiser than the Lord of life, or is there any nearer way to Heaven, than that which he hath taught us? |
A60479 | could the Godly do this? |
A60479 | death shall remove the stock We can bring Kings themselves unto the block If such may be their fate? |
A60479 | doth not he make them? |
A60479 | doth the Soveraign power sleep or die, during their interregnum? |
A60479 | facere& consentire, to do& consent, but to what? |
A60479 | for Martyr''d Charls what man or State Will vengeance seek before it be too late? |
A60479 | for what difference is there between the King, and Subject, but that the one gives the Laws, the other receiveth them? |
A60479 | from God; hath not God therefore greater power than the King ● he hath; From whence do the people derive their power? |
A60479 | from the King; Hath not the King therefore more power than the people? |
A60479 | have the two Houses joyntly, or the House of Commons singly, the Soveraign power, because they have none but what the King giveth them? |
A60479 | is he not gone out like the snuff of a Candle, even loathsom to his own Parasites? |
A60479 | knowest thou not that I have power to Crucifie thee, and have power to release thee? |
A60479 | liceat periturae viribus ignis? |
A60479 | liceat periturae viribus ignis? |
A60479 | loquimur enim tibi, sed si volueris, audis, si autem nolueris, quis te damnabit, nisi qui se pronunciavit esse justitiam? |
A60479 | may any publick or private man stab, or otherwise destroy this Tyrant before he be tried according to the Common course of the Law? |
A60479 | or a Tyrant? |
A60479 | or an enemy? |
A60479 | or can the people, who have no authority, but what they have from him, have authority to correct, and revise their King? |
A60479 | or doth he who ought for to obey, give Laws to him whose right it is to command? |
A60479 | or hold my Peace? |
A60479 | or is there any law to enable the people to call their King to an account? |
A60479 | or that I will not own thee for my Son? |
A60479 | or the people? |
A60479 | or thou thy self? |
A60479 | or whether they ever heard of any such law in any Kingdom or Nation under the Sun? |
A60479 | or, that the change of Government will bring no danger? |
A60479 | ought they to appoint wha ● Officers and Commanders they thought fit? |
A60479 | our times Do run more fircely to forbidden crimes: I''st nothing think you, thus to stayn the flood, And fields, through civil War, with noble blood? |
A60479 | pietas quid caelica prodest? |
A60479 | poterisve rotatis Obvius ire polis, ne te citus auferat axis? |
A60479 | quibus Pepercitaris? |
A60479 | quid intactum nefasti Linquimus? |
A60479 | quo tendit rustica musa? |
A60479 | saith he, who hath power? |
A60479 | shall he give Caesar his due? |
A60479 | shall he give his account to the Inferiour servants of his Lord? |
A60479 | shall he suffer himself to be murthered by the King? |
A60479 | shall we present the Lord with our own husks, and trample on the Manna which he hath prepared for us? |
A60479 | should he fight without the Militia? |
A60479 | that Glory of all Christians, that Glory of the whole World? |
A60479 | the King we know and the Kings son we know, but who are they? |
A60479 | the Law, and the Court of Earls and Barons; But how are they above him? |
A60479 | the high Court of Justice? |
A60479 | then I ask this Question, Whether the sons of Adam have any power either from God or Nature, violently to resist and oppose the King their Father? |
A60479 | unde manus juven ● us Metu Deorum continuit? |
A60479 | what a superstitious and Papistical age do we live in? |
A60479 | what pen can there be so repugnant, and contradictory to all truth? |
A60479 | what, because the Commons made it? |
A60479 | when we account it superstition and Popery to say the Lords Prayer,& the Common Prayer, the ordinary means of our salvation? |
A60479 | where is the reverend Doctor Hewyt, that Glory of your City? |
A60479 | which first gave them their being? |
A60479 | who can look upon his Prophetical, and Incomparable Book, without Admiration, and Weeping Rejoycings? |
A60479 | who can remember his patient Suffrings without Amazement and mourning? |
A60479 | who can say his life, his goods or estate is secure, so long as a Tyrant reigneth? |
A60479 | why doth thine anger smoak against the Sheep of thy pasture? |
A60479 | why not a ● well, a Speaker without a mouth? |
A60479 | why not to the people? |
A60479 | why were they not called Peopledoms? |
A60479 | — Could his Religion do this? |
A60479 | — Quid non mortalia pectora cogis Auri sacra fames? |
A60479 | ● eu quid sancta fides? |
A60479 | ● i pede calcantur justi florentque nefasti: ● egia, caelicolae, terrarum sceptra tenetis? |
A60479 | ● rdine cur nullo mortalia pectora vivunt? |
A57975 | ( for absolutenesse Royall will amount to shedding of innocent blood) for if any oppose the King, or say, Sir, What doe you? |
A57975 | 10. inspire Samuel 17. to call the people before the Lord at Mizpeh, to make Saul King? |
A57975 | 13.4? |
A57975 | 15. had commanded Fornication and eating of blood, might not the Assembly forbid these in the Synod? |
A57975 | 18. for Christ excepteth none, and how can men except?) |
A57975 | 2 When sacred Hierarchy, the order instituted by Christ, is overthrown, what is the condition of Soveraignty? |
A57975 | 2. shall the Prelate and the Anabaptist inferre, Ergo, he giveth it not by plowing, sowing, and the art of the husbahd- man? |
A57975 | 22.12, 13, 14. and what, will this prove Presbyteries to be inconsistent with Monarchies? |
A57975 | 4.7, 8. is it therefore in famine, unlawfull to till the earth, and seeke bread by our industry and are we to doe nothing but to pray for daily bread? |
A57975 | 4.? |
A57975 | 5.31? |
A57975 | 6 To whom can it be due to give the Kingly office, but to him only who is able to give the indument and abilitie for the office? |
A57975 | 69. saith Fern, can Power in the abstract have praise? |
A57975 | 8. and why not of foureteen degrees, as well as the Great Turke, or the King of Spaine? |
A57975 | A King hath power of life and death,( saith the Prelate) What then? |
A57975 | A King is a creature of Gods making onely; and what then? |
A57975 | A man may render himselfe totally under the power of a Master, without any conditions: and why may not the body of a people doe the like? |
A57975 | All these are inseparably in the Crown, but he stealeth in Prerogative Royall in the clause which is now in question? |
A57975 | And do I not resist his person in the one, as in the other? |
A57975 | And for the Churches weaknesse, that is, the weaknesse of the damned Prelates, shall this be the Kings weaknesse? |
A57975 | And how a King and a Tyrant differ? |
A57975 | And how is it that David anoynted by God is yet no King, but a private subject, while all Israel make him King at Hebron? |
A57975 | And if birth was equivalent to divine unction, what needed Ioash who had royall birth, be made King by the people? |
A57975 | And if they may defend themselves by defensive wars, how can wars be without offending? |
A57975 | And is not this the sinne of the Land, that they suffer their King to worship Idols? |
A57975 | And is that charitable of Kings ▪ that they will not be so mad as to destroy their owne Kingdome? |
A57975 | And they that resist the Kings power, resist the King? |
A57975 | And was it a heresie that M. Melvin taught, that Presbyter and Bishop are one function in Scripture? |
A57975 | And what if the subject disobey the Great Turk? |
A57975 | And what instruction was it to King or people to write to them a book of the wicked waies of a King, which nature teacheth without a Doctor? |
A57975 | And what then? |
A57975 | And, if they reteine some of it, habitu, in habit, and in their power? |
A57975 | Are they only possible and accidentall? |
A57975 | Asa his enemies fought against him for his sins, and the peoples sins; shall Moses and the people, Hezekiah, Asa, do then nothing but pray and suffer? |
A57975 | Athanasius said, God hath given Davids Throne to Kings: What, to be Head of the Church? |
A57975 | Barclay, William, 1570?-1630? |
A57975 | Because God is light of lights, doth he not enlighten the earth and aire by the mediation of the Sun? |
A57975 | But have we now Kings immediately sent as Saul was? |
A57975 | But how came they to their Thrones for the most part? |
A57975 | But it may be asked, if no passive subjection at all be commanded as due to Superiours? |
A57975 | But the question is, concerning the designation of the person? |
A57975 | But what Law? |
A57975 | But what doth this prove? |
A57975 | But what ground( saith the Royalist) is there to take Arms against a King? |
A57975 | But what is all this? |
A57975 | But what then? |
A57975 | But whence is it that a man free is now snared as a beast in a gin or trap? |
A57975 | But where are Kings persons, as men, said to be of God, as the Royaltie in abstracto i ●? |
A57975 | But why stand we on the place? |
A57975 | By this? |
A57975 | By what antiquity doth the Crosse signifie Christ? |
A57975 | By what word of God can the King close the mouth of the man of God, whom Christ hath commanded to speake in his name? |
A57975 | Can Fathers decide Controversies better then the Word of God? |
A57975 | Can he be a Father, and a Guide, a Patron to us against our will? |
A57975 | Can this man pray for the King? |
A57975 | Channels? |
A57975 | Did Julian rejoyce in Gods salvation? |
A57975 | Doe not subjects by flight lay restraint upon a Kings power, that he kill not the subjects without cause? |
A57975 | Doe not they that resist the Parliaments power, resist the Parliament? |
A57975 | Eliah said more to Ahab then What hast thou done? |
A57975 | Every Prince is subject to God, but not as a vassal: for a Master may commit felonie, and lose the proprietie of his farme; can God do so? |
A57975 | For I demand, How doth the son succeed to his fathers Crown, and Throne? |
A57975 | For why will he submit all other controversies to the judgement of the Fathers? |
A57975 | God complaineth of the violence of Kings: Is it not for you to know judgement? |
A57975 | God hath joyned King and Power: who dare seperate them?] |
A57975 | Had the Lords of the Philistims, have the States of Holland no power but from a Monarchie? |
A57975 | Hast thou eaten of the tree whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat? |
A57975 | Hath the Father and the sonne, the Master and the servant one Morall subsistence? |
A57975 | Have I conceived all this people? |
A57975 | Have the Venetians any power from a King? |
A57975 | He should be under one Law of God to be executed by men, and not under another Law? |
A57975 | Heare our Prelate: How is it imaginable that Kings can be said to Iudge in Gods place, and not receive the power from God? |
A57975 | How can that be a permissive Law of God, and not his approveing Law by which Kings create inferiour judges? |
A57975 | How could they make their Emperours absolute? |
A57975 | How is the spirit of Prophecie and Government infused in them, as in King Saul? |
A57975 | How shall violence remove violence? |
A57975 | How the inferiour Iudge is the deputy of the King? |
A57975 | How then are we to beleeve, that God would make an universall Law contray to the Law that he established before Israel had a King? |
A57975 | How then can the Liar say, that the Puritan conspireth with the Iesuite? |
A57975 | How then can there be any majestie derived from them? |
A57975 | How was any thing extraordinary, and above a Law, seeing David might have killed his enemie Saul, and according to Gods Law he spared him? |
A57975 | How will this black mouthed Calumniator, make Presbyterians to dethrone Kings? |
A57975 | I am God, I sit in the seat of God, should not be controlled by the Prophets, and no man should say to them, What sayest thou? |
A57975 | I ask when these Emperours took away lives and goods at pleasure, Was that power ordained by God? |
A57975 | I ask when these Emperours took away lives and goods at their pleasure; was that a power ordained of God? |
A57975 | I conceive not; hath the adopted sonne his life, his being, the figure bodily, the manners of the sonne in whose place he is adopted? |
A57975 | I pray you, who are the oppressors? |
A57975 | I pray, P. P. what is this Church power? |
A57975 | If Aaron make a golden Calfe, may not Moses punish him? |
A57975 | If Moses turne an Achab, and sell himselfe to doe wickedly, ought not 80 valiant Priests and Aarons both rebuke, censure, and resist? |
A57975 | If he have such a power as a King given him of God to destroy and waste the people? |
A57975 | If he meane the King in abstracto, that is, the royall dignity, whom speaketh he against? |
A57975 | If the King bring in an Army of forraigners, then a politique community must defend it selfe in a rationall way; Why? |
A57975 | If the King say Masse, shall the Church judge and censure the King for intrusion? |
A57975 | If the King( saith he) shall vex the Common- wealth or one part thereof, with great and intollerable cruelty; what shall the people do? |
A57975 | If the Traveller contend to have his purse againe, shall the Robber say, Robberie was blessed with peace? |
A57975 | If the inferiour Iudges in the act of judging, were the Vicars, and Deputies of King Jehoshaphat, he would have said, Judge righteous judgement; Why? |
A57975 | If thou say, behold we know it not, doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it? |
A57975 | If when the Parliament erreth, the remedy is left to the Wisedome of God, why not when the King erreth? |
A57975 | If, and how the King may punish himself? |
A57975 | In what Scripture hath God Almightie spoken of a fancied Prerogative Royall? |
A57975 | In what sense Government is from God? |
A57975 | Indigencie is the originall of Tutors, the Parents dye; what then shall become of the Orphan and his inheritance? |
A57975 | Is authoritie subjected solely in the Kings Law, and no whit in his Person, though put upon him both by God and Man? |
A57975 | Is it not supreme in its kinde of Church power? |
A57975 | Is it not to deal thy bread to the hungry? |
A57975 | Is it unlawfull with the sword to resist them? |
A57975 | Is it( fit) to say to a King,( Thou art) wicked, and to Princes,( Ye are) ungodly? |
A57975 | Is not this a punishment inflicted by inferiours upon a superiour, according to the way of Royalists? |
A57975 | Is power of blood, either the Kings; or inherent inseparably in his Crown? |
A57975 | Is the restraint laid on by mans law? |
A57975 | Is there no lawfull resisting of ills of punishment, but meere prayers and patience? |
A57975 | Is this an extolling of Kings? |
A57975 | Is this inconsistent with Monarchie? |
A57975 | Is this not a voluntary action, proceeding from a free active, elective power? |
A57975 | Is this questioned, but Kings should be prayed for; or are we wanting in this duty? |
A57975 | Is this the Prelates Logick? |
A57975 | It is a vaine thing to say, Who shall be judge betweene the King and his subj ● cts? |
A57975 | It is an ignorant speech, to ask, Is Authoritie subjected solely in the Kings Law, and no whit in his Person? |
A57975 | It is true, where there is a King, soveraignty must be inviolable, What then? |
A57975 | It were unlawfull to say to the King of Cyrus, What sayest thou? |
A57975 | Knowest thou not, that I have power to crucifie thee? |
A57975 | Lastly he saith, God tooke away Saul in his wrath; but I pray you did God onely doe it? |
A57975 | Let us grant( saith he) that a societie shall refuse to have a Governour over them, shall they be for that free? |
A57975 | Moses his face did shine as a Prophet receiving the Law from God, not as a King: and is this Sunshine of Heaven upon the face of Nero, and Julian? |
A57975 | Mr. Bishop, what better is your Affirmanti incumbit,& c, then mine? |
A57975 | Now is the King, as King, to intend this halfe end? |
A57975 | Now what is the Pope of Rome his extent? |
A57975 | Of the many Kings of Judah and Israel, how many chose this? |
A57975 | One man hath not strength to fight against an Army of ten thousand: doth it follow? |
A57975 | Or if jura majestatis be any such Prerogative? |
A57975 | Royalists can not say so, what ground to say one of Davids acts in his deportment toward Saul was extraordinary, and not all? |
A57975 | Shall the inferiour Judges be guilty of innocent blood, because the King will not doe his duty? |
A57975 | Shall the people in that case serve the King of Kings, onely at the nod, and Royall command of an earthly King? |
A57975 | Shall they obey man rather than God? |
A57975 | Shall we take this upon the word of an excommunicated Prelate? |
A57975 | Should not this be an unjust charge to the people, if God onely; without any action of the people, should immediatly set a King over them? |
A57975 | Si enim hostes extran ● ● s, non tantum vindices occultos agere vellemus, deesset nobis vis numerorum& copiarum? |
A57975 | Sittest thou to judge me after the Law? |
A57975 | So God is the immediate Author of the Pastors, of the Apostles Office, ergo, it is unlawfull to resist a Pastor, though he turne robber? |
A57975 | So all acts of taking away the lives of ill- doers, shall be acts of homicide in Holland: how absurd? |
A57975 | So the King is not an in inferiour Iudge: What? |
A57975 | Some Knights, some Ships, some Cities and Burroughes, do carry a crosse; are they made Christs vice- gerents of late? |
A57975 | Some will have it in a collective body, but how? |
A57975 | Sometimes all is cast upon ou ● mans voice, why may not the King be this one man? |
A57975 | That is true, but was it not arbitrary to them to breake a law Physically? |
A57975 | The King hath his right from God: What then, not from the people? |
A57975 | The Parliament( saith Williams) may not command the King: Why then make they supplications to him, if their Vote be a Law? |
A57975 | The Prelate eating his tongue for anger, striveth to prove, That all power, and so Royall power, is of God: but what can he make of it? |
A57975 | The forme is for the action, therefore the action is more excellent then the forme, and an accident then the subject or substance? |
A57975 | The people are to say, You are Gods, and your power is below, saith the Prelate: what then? |
A57975 | The question is, For what end is a King made so happy, as to be exalted King? |
A57975 | The question may be, which of these governments be most agreeable to nature? |
A57975 | The state of the question is much perverted, for these be different questions, Whether the Kingdom may dethrone a wicked and Tyrannous Prince? |
A57975 | The three hundred sinned in resisting Midian, and defeating them: Why? |
A57975 | This Assembly is to judge, what Doctrine is treasonable; what then? |
A57975 | To apply the subject to the accident, is it any thing else but to apply the accident to the subject? |
A57975 | To whom can it be more proper to give the rule over men, then to him who is the onely King truely and properly of the whole world? |
A57975 | V. Whether or no, the P. P. proveth, that Soveraignty is immediately from God, not from the people? |
A57975 | WHether Government be by a divine Law? |
A57975 | Was therefore Manasseh not lawfully called to the Crown? |
A57975 | What King going forth to warre? |
A57975 | What a meane resistance is? |
A57975 | What a sinne is it to rob God, or the King of their due? |
A57975 | What essentiall and fundamentall priviledges are left to Parliaments? |
A57975 | What followeth? |
A57975 | What force the Supreme Law hath over the King? |
A57975 | What if he turne Tyrant, and destroy his Subjects with the sword? |
A57975 | What if the King command not his people to serve God; or, What if he forbid Daniel to pray to God? |
A57975 | What if the Royall line surcease? |
A57975 | What is on man under no restraint, but made a God on earth, and so drunk with the graunder of a sinning- God, here under the Moone and Clouds? |
A57975 | What is the law of the King, and his Power? |
A57975 | What is this, but I inhibite you to be creators by omnipotent power? |
A57975 | What law of man? |
A57975 | What meaneth he? |
A57975 | What more resistance is made to Royall power by wals interposed, then by Seas and miles of earth interposed? |
A57975 | What more unbeseeming Kings is it to swear to do their duty, then to promise covenant wayes to do the same? |
A57975 | What more vaine? |
A57975 | What need Israel strive, when Moses and Aaron are two Independents? |
A57975 | What power hath the King in relation to the Law, and the people? |
A57975 | What power the People and States of Parliament have over the King, and in the State? |
A57975 | What power the People, and States of Parliament, hath over the King, and in the State? |
A57975 | What reason is in this consequence? |
A57975 | What relation the King hath to the Law? |
A57975 | What shall they reserve to make a new King, if this man dye? |
A57975 | What then? |
A57975 | What then? |
A57975 | What then? |
A57975 | What then? |
A57975 | What then? |
A57975 | What then? |
A57975 | What then? |
A57975 | What, shall it then follow, that he worketh nothing in the creatures by their mediation, as causes? |
A57975 | What, will the Prelate make them independent Kings for that? |
A57975 | What? |
A57975 | What? |
A57975 | What? |
A57975 | What? |
A57975 | When God doth apply the person to royall power, what? |
A57975 | Whence is it that this man, rather then this man, is crowned King? |
A57975 | Where is the Law of the Kingdome called a Law of punishing innocent people? |
A57975 | Where is the negative voice of the King here? |
A57975 | Where read he this? |
A57975 | Where the word of a King is, there is power, And who may say unto him, What doest thou? |
A57975 | Where the word of a King is, there is power: and who may say to him, what dost thou? |
A57975 | Whether England be a conquered Nation at the beginning? |
A57975 | Whether Government be warranted by a divine Law? |
A57975 | Whether Magistrates, as Magistrates, be naturall?] |
A57975 | Whether Monarchy be the best of governments? |
A57975 | Whether Nature hath determined, that there should be one supreme Ruler a King, or many Rulers in a free Commnitie? |
A57975 | Whether Royalists by cogent reasons do prove the unlawfulnesse of defensive warres? |
A57975 | Whether Royall Power and definite forms of Government be from God? |
A57975 | Whether Royall Power, and definite Forms of Government be from God? |
A57975 | Whether Subsidies be due to the King as King?] |
A57975 | Whether absolute and unlimited power of Royaltie, be a ray and beame of Divine Majestie, immediately derived from God?] |
A57975 | Whether all Christian Kings are dependent from Christ, and may be called his Vicegerents? |
A57975 | Whether all Governments be but broken Governments, and deviations from Monarchie?] |
A57975 | Whether doth the P. P. with reason ascribe to us the doctrine of Jesuites, in the Question of lawfull defence? |
A57975 | Whether doth the P. Prelate upon good grounds, ascribe to us the doctrine of Jesuites in these Questions of lawfull defensive Wars? |
A57975 | Whether every free Commonwealth hath not in it a supremacie of Majestie, which it may formally place in one, or many?] |
A57975 | Whether is Royaltie an immediate issue and spring of Nature?] |
A57975 | Whether is the Coronation of a King any other thing but a Ceremonie?] |
A57975 | Whether or no Goverment be warranted by the Law of nature? |
A57975 | Whether or no Royall dignitie have its spring from nature, and how that is true( every man is born free) and how servitude is contrary to nature? |
A57975 | Whether or no Soveraigntie is so from the people, that it remaineth in them in some part, so as they may in case of necessitie resume it? |
A57975 | Whether or no Wars raised by the Estates and Subjects for their owne just defence against the Kings bloody Emissaries be lawfull? |
A57975 | Whether or no any Prerogative at all above the law be due to the King? |
A57975 | Whether or no are subjects more obnoxious to a King then Clients to Patrons, and servants to Masters, because the Patron can not be the Clients Judge? |
A57975 | Whether or no he be more principally a King, who is a King by birth, or he who is a King by the free election and suffrages of the people? |
A57975 | Whether or no passive obedience be a meane to which we are subjected in conscience by vertue of a Divine Commandement? |
A57975 | Whether or no self- defence against any unjust violence offered to the life, be warranted by Gods Law, and the Law of Nature and Nations? |
A57975 | Whether or no the King be Vnivocally, or only Analogically, and by proportion a father? |
A57975 | Whether or no the King be in Dignity and Power above the people? |
A57975 | Whether or no the King be in Dignity and power above the people? |
A57975 | Whether or no the King be the sole supreme and finall interpreter of the Law? |
A57975 | Whether or no the people have any power over the King, either by his oath, covenant, or any other way? |
A57975 | Whether or no the people make a Person their King conditionally, or absolutely; and whether the King be tyed by any such covenant? |
A57975 | Whether or no the people make a Person their King conditionally, or absolutely? |
A57975 | Whether or no the sufferings of the Martyrs in the Primitive Church militate against the lawfulnesse of defensive wars? |
A57975 | Whether or no, Soveraigntie is so in and from the people, that they may resume their power in time of extreme necessity? |
A57975 | Whether or no, Wars raised by the Subjects and Estates, for their own just defence against the Kings bloody Emissaries, be lawfull? |
A57975 | Whether or no, any Prerogative at all above the Law be due to the King? |
A57975 | Whether or no, he be more principally a King, who is a King by birth, or he who is a King by the free election of the people? |
A57975 | Whether or no, the King be onely and immediately from God, and not from the people? |
A57975 | Whether or no, the King be the sole, supreme and finall Interpreter of the Law? |
A57975 | Whether or no, the P. Prelate proveth, by force of reason, That the people can not be capable of any power of Goverment? |
A57975 | Whether or no, the convening of the subjects without the Kings will, be unlawfull?] |
A57975 | Whether or no, the people have any power over the King, either by his Oath, Covenant, or any other way? |
A57975 | Whether or not Royall birth be equivalent to Divine Unction? |
A57975 | Whether or not Royall birth be equivalent to divine unction? |
A57975 | Whether or not a Kingdome may lawfully be purchased by the sole title of conquest? |
A57975 | Whether selfe- defence by opposing violence to unjust violence be lawfull, by the Law of God, and Nature? |
A57975 | Whether the Estates of Scotland are to help their Brethren the protestants in England against Cavaliers? |
A57975 | Whether the King be above Parliaments, as their Iudge? |
A57975 | Whether the King be above the Law or no? |
A57975 | Whether the King be above the Law? |
A57975 | Whether the King hath a Prerogative Royall above Laws? |
A57975 | Whether the King hath any Royall prerogative, or a power to dispence with Lawes? |
A57975 | Whether the King have the power of warre only? |
A57975 | Whether the King may, in his actions, intend his owne Prerogative and Absolutenes?] |
A57975 | Whether the King of Scotland be an absolute Prince, having Prerogatives above Parliament and Laws? |
A57975 | Whether the King of Scotland be an absolute Prince, having prerogatives above Laws and Parliaments? |
A57975 | Whether the P. Prelate conclude, that neither constitution, nor designation of Kings is from the people? |
A57975 | Whether the Prelate proveth by force of reason, that the people can not be capable of any power of Government? |
A57975 | Whether the Seas, Floods, Road- wayes, Castles, Ports, publike Magazine, Militia, Armour, Forts and Strengths be the Kings?] |
A57975 | Whether the Subjects be obliged to pay the debts of the King?] |
A57975 | Whether the power of Warre be onely in the King? |
A57975 | Whether the power of the King as King be absolute, or dependent and limited by Gods first mould and paterne of a King? |
A57975 | Whether the power of the King as King, be absolute, or dependent, and limited by Gods first mould and patern of a King? |
A57975 | Whether the supreme Law, the safetie of the people, be above the King? |
A57975 | Whether was King Uzzah dethroned by the People?] |
A57975 | Which is the best government, that is, the most profitable, or the most pleasant, or the most honest? |
A57975 | Who art thou that disputest with God? |
A57975 | Who made the King? |
A57975 | Who should then punish and coerce the Parliament in the case of exorbitance? |
A57975 | Why did God at this time rather use an extraordinary meanes of saving his Church? |
A57975 | Why is not royalty then founded on grace? |
A57975 | Why might not the people of Israell, Peers or Sanedrim have convened before them, judged, and punished David, for his Adultery and Murther? |
A57975 | Why not to the Prophets and Apostles? |
A57975 | Why the King ● breathing Law? |
A57975 | Why? |
A57975 | Why? |
A57975 | an 1641. never answered, couched under the name of inconveniency? |
A57975 | an head over such as will not be menbers? |
A57975 | and by the sole power of the bloudy sword? |
A57975 | and he that keepeth thy soul, doth he not know it? |
A57975 | and hee argueth from a morall duty, he is the Lords annoynted, therefore I will not kill him? |
A57975 | and how did Israel conspire with Absolom, to unking and dethron ● David, whom the Lord had made King? |
A57975 | and how doth the Lord v. 22. expresly shew to Samuel, and the people, the man that they might make him King? |
A57975 | and shall he not render to every man, according to his work? |
A57975 | and so what need to fetch a Royall power from Heaven, to be immediatly infused in him, seeing the people hath such a power in themselves at hand? |
A57975 | and that Abbots and Priors were not in Gods book? |
A57975 | and was it against the Oath of God to defend themselves by Armes? |
A57975 | and was it not an act of tyranny in King Achab, to take the vineyard of Naboth, and in King Saul? |
A57975 | and what needed Saul and David, who had more then royall birth, even divine unction, be made Kings by the people? |
A57975 | and whereby the King may oppresse, and no man may say, What dost thou? |
A57975 | and whether there be such a thing as a Covenant tying the King no lesse then his subjects? |
A57975 | and why did David seek an oath of Ionathan? |
A57975 | and why then do Royalists talk to us of Gods immediate creating of Kings, without any interveening action of the people? |
A57975 | as David and Hezekiah? |
A57975 | but had Herod and Pilate any warrant to crucifie him? |
A57975 | can be said to judge in Gods place, and not receive the power from God immediatly, without any consent or covenant of men? |
A57975 | dic ubi legis: and is this a proof of inconsistency of Presbyteries with a Monarchie? |
A57975 | did God grant Nero his hearts desire? |
A57975 | doth it exclude the peoples consent? |
A57975 | ergo, the Pastor is above all the Kings Lawes? |
A57975 | even to have peace and safety, surrender themselves fully to the power of a King? |
A57975 | except they receive a power so to doe from God? |
A57975 | have I begotten them? |
A57975 | is this a different action from the peoples applying the person to royall dignitie? |
A57975 | life eternall to Heathen Kings, as Kings? |
A57975 | make any thing against the lawfulnesse of defensive warrs? |
A57975 | may not the Soveraigne power be eminently, fontaliter; originally and radically in the people? |
A57975 | no: or that David consulted the oracle of God, what to do when Saul was coming against him? |
A57975 | non Reges quoque accidere solent? |
A57975 | of France only an Hunter, Alphonsus Dux Ferrariensis only an Astronomer, Philippe of Macedo only a Musitian, and all because they are Kings? |
A57975 | or doth he naturally resemble the father as the naturall sonne doth? |
A57975 | or if jura Majestatis be any such Prerogative Royall? |
A57975 | or is it from the people also, and their free choise? |
A57975 | or is it subordinate to the King? |
A57975 | or is the Iudgement the Kings? |
A57975 | prove that in no case it is lawfull to resist the King? |
A57975 | quid ergo? |
A57975 | shall it follow that the soveraigne in concreto may not be resisted? |
A57975 | that flying is resistance? |
A57975 | to take the people of Gods fields and vineyards, and olive- yards, and give them to their servants? |
A57975 | was it extraordinary that David fled? |
A57975 | was this extraoardinary above a law? |
A57975 | were not these Rulers lawfull Magistrates, armed with power from God? |
A57975 | what then? |
A57975 | will he guide me as a Father, an Husband against my will? |