Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
A43758For what was the fruit of that Dispute, and what liberty did the Contenders purchase, but a liberty to destroy themselves and ruine their Countrey?
A43758or if he have power to lead them where he please, and can not raise money to maintain them, to what end will he lead them any where?
A29394How do they stile the King?
A29394What is an Imperial Crown?
A29394What says that Oath?
A29394s.n.,[ London: 1690?]
A59476How long shall the Husband maintain his Dominion, or any man his property from his Friends, or his Neighbours Obstinacy?
A59476What are empty Titles?
A59476What is present Power, or Riches, or great Estate, wherein I have no firm no fixed Property?
A59476s.n.,[ London?
A26737How the onely?
A343651. we find Saul, and that by Gods appointment( where the Text faith) hath not the Lord annointed thee to be Governour over his inheritance?
A34365You will say, what?
A34365must men then think and believe manifest lyes?
A47055And how shall every private family be able to doe this with Securitie?
A47055But if he be a Monarch I aske againe; if there be a power in the Commonwealth, which is not in him, is it subordinate to his power, or no?
A47055For what cause?
A47055For who can make a Law without a power?
A47055The maine question is, who is the Efficient Cause of Regall or Monarchicall power?
A47055The will also hath for her adaequate Object omne ens as it is bonum?
A47055will not every one strive for the best possession?
A47055will not the shepheards of Abraham and Lot, and of Isaac and Gerara fall to contention for water& pastures, and such like other necessary elbow roome?
A61839And are they not yet for all that both bound in the exercise of those powers to obey the King and his Laws?
A61839By this time I doubt not, all that are not willfully blind( for who so blind, as he that will not see?)
A61839Can any think God will wink at such foul partiality?
A61839Do they not both pretend their Powers to be of God?
A61839For what is it cum ratione insanire, if this be not?
A61839How then cometh it to pass, that these are pronounced innocent, and those guilty?
A61839I demand then: As to the Regal Power, is not the case of the Bishops and of the Ministers every way alike?
A61839Is there not clearly the same reason of both?
A61839To deny fire to be hot, or water to be moist, or snow to be white; when our sences enform us they are such?
A61839or account them pure with the bag of deceitful weights?
A51425Christian Religion and conscience oblige us to subjection?
A51425For who might have pretended fairer in that kinde, than the Primitive Christians against Idolatrous Persecutors?
A51425In Quibus?
A51425In what things we must be subject?
A51425Is it fit to say to a King, thou art wicked; and to Priuces ye are ungodly?
A51425Thirdly, we must not dispute their Commands, for where the word of a King is, there is power, and who may say unto him, what doest thou?
A51425What is it but Rebellion which bred that confusion in Hell amongst the damned spirits?
A51425What is it but subjection which continues the blessed Harmony in Heaven amongst the Angels?
A51425Who might have pretended more rightly the defence of himself, of his fellow Disciples, of his Master, yea of Religion, that Saint Peter?
A51425for he that provoketh him to anger, sins against his owne soule; and what then shall become of his body?
A51425so fearefull, as what can be conceived to be added?
A33467?
A33467And if Sincere, how cometh it to pass, that in his Confession, he hath no respect to his injured Neighbour?
A33467But first, it will be necessary to ask, Whether by the Church, they mean the Catholic, or some part of it only?
A33467If it be so, to what purpose are those significant Solemnities used at the Coronations?
A33467Methinks, the very consideration of our Interest, and Society, should put us in mind of Subjection: for what a Polity else should we make?
A33467Of this Power King Solomons Sentence is very absolute, Who shall say to a King, what dost thou?
A33467Thus, if they demand, why in the Reign of Queen Mary the Romish Religion, and in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth the Reformed Religion, prevailed?
A33467Were not the Religious Rites in Judea altered, according to the Genius of the Prince?
A33467What is this, but to seek a pretence for Regicide?
A33467Why are they Crown''d, Inthroned, Inoyled?
A33467what Blood and Martyrdom might it have saved?
A33467what greater Soloecism could we grant in Nature, than that the Head should give place to the Supremacy of the Foot?
A88972& would not a good Learned Iurist say, that this is not only intrusion upon meeriy civill power, but upon the very Royall Rights themselves?
A88972Againe I aske, seeing you make Doctors one of your four holy Functions Ecclesiasticall, constituted by Christ, in what Iudicatorie find we them?
A88972And why?
A88972I would gladly aske of one of these Rabbies and great Masters in Israell, how commeth it that the Commissioners of Burrowes sit there, voyce there?
A88972Is it not intrinsecally inherent in the Crown or wheresoever soveraignty is fixed?
A88972Is not this potest as utriusque gladii?
A88972Sir, are these things consistent with Monarchie, or the obedience is due to Soveraignty and its Highest Courts?
A88972Sir, are those things consistent with Monarchie?
A88972Sir, can it appeare that by Holy Writ or Reason such Popular tumultuary reformations are warrantable?
A88972Sir, if there were no more instances what doe you thinke of this?
A88972are they too de jure divino, by divine right?
A88972what Father?
A88972what Scripture?
A88972what man offending against the Majesty of God( which is as they fansie many times) may not be taken away by one like to a Ravilliack?
A88972what practice of the Church doth warrant such a reformation?
A50955And as the Law is between Brother and Brother, Father and Son, Maister and Servant, wherfore not between King or rather Tyrant and People?
A50955Have they not beseig''d him and to thir power forbid him Water and Fire, save what they shot against him to the hazard of his life?
A50955Have they not hunted and pursu''d him round about the Kingdom with sword and fire?
A50955How much more justly then may they fling off tyranny, or tyrants?
A50955To the second that he was an enemie, I answer, what Tyrant is not?
A50955Which if they ever well considerd, how little leasure would they find to be the most pragmatical Sidesmen of every popular tumult and Sedition?
A50955or if the Law be not present, or too weake, what doth it warrant us to less then single defence or civil warr?
A54686Sr George Moor said, We know the power of her Majesty can not be restrained by any Act, why therefore should we thus talk?
A54686or by what Rule of Right Reason should the King, being of full age and sanity of mind, not be permitted the right use of the Faculties of his Soul?)
A54686or was God to be prayed unto to give his Judgment to the King or unto the People?
A54686with which not being able to remove their fixed resolutions, he with some anger expostulating, told them, Ero nè perjurus?
A8668312. that the time of the Church''s dissipation shall be 1290. dayes?
A8668313. to have but two horns, and here to have seven Heads, and ten Horns?
A86683But how comes this Beast to have seven heads, and ten Horns, since he is none of the Roman Heads?
A86683But suppose there were never a Jew converted, must this make the purpose of God of none effect?
A86683How can two be more contrary?
A86683How is he the Beast that is?
A86683How was all dasht, and that happy work retanded on a sudden?
A86683Now if Daniel, in his Prophesie, should onely respect the Gentile Church, how could Iohn, Christ, and Daniel, be reconciled in their prophefies?
A86683READER: I Have taken upon me one of the hardest Taskes this day in the World, and who am I that undertake it?
A86683What if I did assert this?
A59833How easily was it driven out without a blow?
A59833Is it thus that you curse not the King, no not in your heart?
A59833What a silly poor feeble thing is Popery in its proper Colours?
A59833Whom do you arraign when you say that Oath ought never to have been made?
A59833and do you thus overcome evil with good?
A59833and what though the King to whom I swear goes about to destroy the Law?
A59833by no means: Am I bound by that Oath to be one of his Instruments that shall help him to subvert the Law, and enslave my fellow subjects?
A59833did he make or enact it himself?
A59833is it thus that you commit your self and your cause to him that judgeth righteously?
A59833is it thus that you heap Coals of Fire upon the Head of your Enemy?
A59833is therefore my swearing Allegiance to him, swearing to things inconsistent?
A59833or am I perjured if I refuse?
A59833or did the bloody Preachers of your Doctrine of Resistance in those days suppress any of his Crimes out of a tender regard to his Person or Credit?
A59833or was it not made and enforced in the good days of Queen Elizabeth, and his Grandfather King James the First?
A59833or was the exacting that Oath any part of the Accusation laid to the Charge of Charles the Martyr?
A85738But an Emperour, or King without a command, what other thing is he, than as a dreame without sleepe?
A85738But, to what kind of Princes do the Apostles& c Prophets in Scriptures enjoyne these duties to be performed?
A85738Doe you contemne the saecular power?
A85738Excellently Solomon: Where the word of a King is, there is power; and who may say unto him, What dost thou?
A85738For if we would take upon us to be open and professed enemies, doe you think that wee could want money or men?
A85738For what is greater, what more inviolable than the Imperiall Majesty?
A85738From whence Saint Augustine( whose sentence is reckoned amongst the Canons) doth thus argue: By what right do you defend the Church?
A85738Shall there be any evill in the City( saith God by the Prophet Amos) which the Lord hath not done?
A85738Were they so stupid and ignorant that they did not understand what power was in the Pope or People, to reduce their Kings into good government?
A85738What, doe we think that they were destitute of strength, that they could not oppose one power with another, or repell one injury with another?
A85738Why so?
A85738With whom, is agreeable that of the Scriptures, In those dayes there was no King in Jsraell: and what follows?
A85738by Gods Law, or by mans?
A85738or who is So puft up with the conceit of pride, as that hee dare contemne the understanding of the King?
A59803And how could so innocent a person die, but by the Hands of Vnjust and Tyrannical Powers?
A59803And the Cup which my Father has given me, shall I not drink it?
A59803But how then sh ● ll the Scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be?
A59803For indeed can any thing be plainer than our Saviour''s Answer?
A59803For, can the Apostle be thought absolutely to condemn Resistance, if he makes it only unlawful to resist, wh ● n we want power to conquer?
A59803How now does David behave himself in this extremity?
A59803Now, why should he entertain these men, but to defend himself against the Forces of Saul?
A59803Therefore?
A59803They ask him whether it were lawful to pay Tribute to Caesar?
A59803What course does he take to secure himself from Saul?
A59803Wherefore?
A59803is it lawful to give Tribute to Caesar, or not?
A46961And therefore to ask, Who shall Absolve us from our Oath to King James?
A46961But because some Men have moved another Question, Who shall be Judg when there is an Insurrection, Rebellion or Invasion?
A46961By what Law?
A46961Has He a Throne like God?
A46961If Queen Maries Laws were no Laws, because they were wicked persecuting Laws, why were they repealed?
A46961Is he of Himself, and for Himself?
A46961Now I would fain know wherein those who transport the King''s Liege Subjects, without any Power to transport them, differ from Kidnappers?
A46961Or has he a Personal Authority from God, antecedent to Laws, to be a King?
A46961Or has he the Natural Authority of a Father to govern his Children?
A46961Or were Mankind made in the day of their Creation, by Nations, and created Prince and People, as they were created Male and Female?
A46961Then it must be proved that he has begotten his Three Kingdoms, and all the People in all other His Majesty''s Dominions?
A46961This Personal Authority of the King, antecedent to all the Laws of the Land, independent on them, and superiour to them: whence is it?
A46961Was it not thus when the Two Houses were erected, and endowed with the like Power?
A46961Where is Arbitrariness then?
A46961and consequently, whether there be occasion or not, according to Law, to imploy the Militia, and to draw them forth into Actual Service?
A46961or those that destroy them, without any Power to destroy them, differ from Murderers?
A46961why were they not declared to be null from the beginning?
A07819& qui non Graeci?
A07819And will any Scottish have Scotland go for lesse?
A07819But how now?
A07819But what, Every soul subject?
A07819But would any of his Servants seeke to destroy Any for his sake?
A07819For were not these Powers heathen Governors?
A07819Here you hear his profession, will you see it in his practise?
A07819I have said this, and have good warrant for it; for when King David, in the like case, —( like Case?
A07819I. Fond, for what saith the Canon?
A07819Now all these being conspicuous in this One, what but black malice can cast a Cloud upon such brightnesse?
A07819So say the Romish, but why?
A07819This case being so plain, that any man may understand the necessitiy of subjection in Everyman, our next Quaere must be, To Whom?
A07819What other meaning can mortall weapons have then mortall wounds?
A07819What?
A07819Whence was that Epistle written?
A07819With what front or face then could these Romish, and other Seducers distort this Text, for proofe of a Rebellious Conclusion?
A07819Yet why thus?
A07819and Persecuters of the Professors thereof?
A07819were not the most of them cruell Tyrants?
A07819were they not all professed enemies to the Christian faith?
A07819which in the next place is to be spoken of,[ He that resisteth the Power,] what?
A29375( Answer) this followes not?
A29375Againe, why will this make the Parliament arbitrary, or cast the people into an implicite Faith?
A29375And our Saviour when Pilate said: Knowest thou not that I have power to loose thee?
A29375And sixthly, If you be overcome and die, you die for God and your Countrey; who can bring his life into a better market?
A29375Are the Divines of England?
A29375Are the Divines of Scotland?
A29375Did hee not command the Christian Romanes to bee subject to the Romane Senate?
A29375Dr. Fern, But in case he endeavour to force the contrary Religion upon his subjects, for that must be supposed how then will your Allegeance bold?
A29375Here is a loud cry against Brownists and Anabaptists, but who are Brownists?
A29375How can men be faithfull to you that are unfaithfull to God?
A29375I brought a Testimony of the Divines of the Councell of Basil, and that hee doth not contradict: Are the Divines of Geneva of his mind?
A29375That all the people went to Gilgall, and there they made Saul King: Whereupon, sayes o Mendoza, What is more plain?
A29375Thirdly, what can be more plaine then the words themselves?
A29375Will any else besides this Dr. make such an inference?
A29375Will hee have the Diviner of Switzerland?
A29375dost thou renounce the divell and all his workes?
A29375has this bin for many yeares?
A3638530. about to destroy wicked Iezabel who is on my side, saith he, who?
A36385And yet if one small transgression, in any of the premisses bee, as it is, enough to sinke the guilty; what will an huge heape doe?
A36385Doe they meane so, as each man is drawne away and tempted, as S. Iames teacheth, of his own lusts and untamed desires?
A36385Doth he not owne and uphold them in their proceedings?
A36385For as now what man can be securely safe in any place?
A36385For what then?
A36385Heu quantum potuit terrae pelagique parari, Hoc quem civiles hauserunt sanguine dextrae?
A36385If Caines own sinne alone was heavier then he could beare, what may we thinke of the numerous sinnes of a whole Nation?
A36385Is it for the Libertie and freedome of our persons?
A36385Just in the method of those of Rome( whom they so much abhorre) their practise here no way keepes pace with their doctrine: For why?
A36385Know yee not that it will be bitternesse in the end?
A36385Lastly, after the many Acts of grace; done by him already, as sure pawnes of his reall intentions for the time to come?
A36385Next, who first drew sword,& gave the onset, as it were, thus putting fire to the fuell now prepared and laid together?
A36385Not him whom the Lord himselfe hath trusted?
A36385Not your King?
A36385Now hath not the King been thus zealous for the peace of our Ierusalem; Hath not he likewise( though in vaine) thus pursued and hasted after it?
A36385Quaeris Alcidae parem?
A36385Shall the Sword devoure for ever?
A36385So religious and just a King?
A36385To this end have they divided( who knowes not?)
A36385What can I say more or lesse concerning this unquiet barking humour of theirs, but this, the Lord rebuke them?
A36385Who first ministred the occasion of this unnaturall war, by tumults and seditious riots, in the open streets?
A36385Who lastly hath ever since most hotly Pursued and followed the businesse at first so unfortunately begun?
A36385Whom God and the law both have entrusted with the charge, of so great a people?
A36385Whose Oxe have I taken, or whose Asse have I taken, or whom have I done wrong to?
A36385Yet some moreover there bee, who stick not to complaine, that he is still misled; So runs the phrase; But for Gods love by whom, or how?
A258433.18 19. quoted, and commented upon?
A25843Again, what hath been more frequently practised by noble enemies than severity and justice upon such as they have gotten into their power?
A25843And 3ly Is that true, that the Army have alwaies lusted after the royal bed: What?
A25843At this Mr. Sedgwick grows angry, and fals into passion: You lye grosly saith he: But wherein?
A25843But if you should now ask of me( as the young man did of Christ) what lack we yet?
A25843But to answer, First, Is the punishing of bad Governours a dissolving the foundations of Government?
A25843Cocks feeding on garlick overcome others; but how?
A25843Do they in the Remonstrance manifest a jealousie and fear?
A25843For instance, look here good Reader, out of what water is this fish taken, and what fish is it?
A25843Have ye not read what David did when he was an hungred, and they that were with him?
A25843He saith, should you not rather propose, that all power, dominion and reign should be given to the Lord?
A25843Here he useth the common practice of false accusers, but I shall leave that to some other pen: and why not the falshood as wel?
A25843Here is some comfort for you souldiers: but will he stand to this?
A25843I answer, It was Jehoshaphat''s failing, and the Lord blames him for it, saying, Should''st thou help the ungodly?
A25843Is the fight of sin and godly sorrow for it, a miserable and dark principle and a very wicked practice?
A25843Methinks I could say more to you, then Mordecai did to Hester, Who knowes whether thou art come to the Kingdom for such a time as this?
A25843Next, he chargeth the Arme, with wofull feares, and why?
A25843The answer is, If God justifie, who can condemn?
A25843The preservation of the Kings person is in the covenant, but how?
A25843To this his answer is, The King is the greatest sufferer in the kingdom; hath God judged him?
A25843We speak not of doweries and other portions: and what serve they for, or what profit have the people by them?
A25843What their eternall salvation sure, and yet may perish with the devil?
A25843What''s the inference?
A25843When was this once?
A25843alwaies, how are they then deeply revolted and turn''d back to the world?
A25843and why wil you not submit to his judgement?
A25843doth a Phisitian destroy the body by removing of corrupt and filthy humors from it?
A25843eng Sedgwick, William, 1609 or 10- 1669?
A25843how doth he make it good?
A25843in a condition better than they?
A25843is God weary or remisse, that you would have men take it into their hands?
A25843is there not a cause?
A25843or when did Gods people fall upon punishing after God hath done it?
A25843that needs some consideration, both what, and how?
A25843what greater shame and dishonor can a nation lie under, then to take the son of a known and apparent adultresse, and make him their King?
A25843what have they now done?
A25843what is proper to every man, as a man moral, civil, natural?
A25843when did God chasten or judge men, then give him to men to chasten again?
A25843who of all the Kings of Canaan taken in war by Joshua, were not afterwards by his appointment put to death?
A25843will ye take it out of Gods hand?
A58824And doe not the Fathers assent to the same?
A58824And hath it not been so ever since?
A58824And is he not so in the judgement of reason?
A58824And now, Beloved judge your selves, whether it is fitter to obey God or man, as the Apostles spake in another case?
A58824And was it not so afterwards?
A58824Belial, what?
A58824But by the Prophet of God, it is resolved for God, saying, see you him whom the Lord hath chosen?
A58824But hath it beene so with the Kings of England?
A58824But what then?
A58824Children of Belial, how?
A58824Did the Divel beget these men in my Text?
A58824I begin with the first, the description of Rebels, in the first words; the children of Belial saied: And first, what is here meant by Belial?
A58824In a word, the inferiour Governours are made by the cheife, and who is the chiefe but the King?
A58824In the expostulation, the saucie expostulation of Rebells, How shall this man save us?
A58824None, no man, no assembly of men, who but God?
A58824See yee him, Quem populus elegit?
A58824That''s for the Jewes, you le say; It is true, and it is as true of the Nations too; what else meanes Isaiah''s Vnctus Cyrus?
A58824The children of Belial said, How shall this man save us?
A58824They account the King but as one of themselves, and as one chosen by themselves; and therefore they saied, How shall this man save us?
A58824They did malè dicere, saying, How shall this man save us?
A58824Thus it was in the daies of Moses and the Prophets; and was it not thus in the dayes of Christ and his Apostles?
A58824To this is is answered by the children of Belial for the people; saying, How shall this man, This man, and no more, save us?
A58824What else meanes Solomons Per me Reges regnant?
A58824What reason have they for it?
A58824Whether God or the People be the Author and Efficient of Monarchie?
A58824Whether God or the people bee the author and efficient of Monarchy?
A58824Whether it be Lawfull for Subjects to beare Armes, or to Contribute for the maintenance of a Warre against the King?
A58824Whether it be lawfull for Subjects to beare armes, or to contribute for the maintenance of a warre against the King?
A58824Whether it be lawfull to beare Armes, or to contribute for the maintenance of a Warre against the King?
A58824Whether the King be Singulis major, but Universis minor?
A58824Whether the King bee universis minor, lesse then the body representative?
A58824Why else did Christ acknowledge Pilates power to be de super?
A58824Why, it was because they looked on him as a single man, how shall this man save us?
A58824Will you heare another Naturalist, little inferiour to this, say the same?
A58824You see what is meant by these words, they despised him; will you now see why they despised him?
A58824],[ London?
A58824and at his Coronation he is wedded to the Kingdome with a Ring: Why else doe wee call the King Caput Regni?
A58824and hath not every body a head?
A58824and the unfolding of my second question, which is, Whether the King be Singulis major, but Vniversis minor?
A58824or else, how and why are they called the children of Belial?
A58824whether God or the People be the Author of Monarchie?
A58824whether it be lawfull for subjects to beare armes or to contribute for the maintenance of a warre against the King?
A58824whether it be lawfull for subjects to beare armes or to contribute for the maintenance of a warre against the King?
A58824whether the King be singulis major, but universis minor?
A58824whether the King be singulis major, but universis minor?
A58824why else doe we call the Ring Sponsus Regni?
A41219But how came they of Subjects to be absolute Monarchs?
A41219But what?
A41219But would any man ever have defended the revolt of the ten Tribes, if Rehoboam had promised to conserve their Liberties?
A41219Concerning the derivation of Power we answer?
A41219Conscience here will see how to resolve, upon the triall of these two particulars, Whether the King or they be upon the defensive part?
A41219Conscience will discern whether part is upon the defensive, by inquiring, First, Who were first in Arms?
A41219Fourthly, was there ever more cause of resistence then in those dayes?
A41219Hath this King forbid the exercise of the Religion established or left off to professe it himselfe?
A41219I answer: But is the Religion established denied to any that now fight for it?
A41219Is the King not bound to perform?
A41219Must not he also have his securitie against the other, which he can not have but by Power of denying?
A41219Or are these means of safety extinct in the Consent of the Senate or the two Houses?
A41219Or can it be for antient Rights and undoubted Priviledges that they contend?
A41219Or does Religion stand in need of a defense, which it self condemnes, a defence which would be a perpetuall scandall to it?
A41219Or ha''s he not a limited power according to the Lawes?
A41219Or may Protestants upon a jealousie resist a Protestant King professing the same Religion, and promising to conserve it entire to them?
A41219Secondly, by inquiring what is the c ● ● se of these Arms?
A41219The Apostle forbids it to them as well as to the Romans in such a case: if so, where are these means of safety by this power of resistance?
A41219The preservation of Religion and Liberties is pretended, but can it be for either?
A41219What do they contend for?
A41219What shall we then think of this geneall Revolt from Allegiance that ha''s possessed well- near ten Tribes of twelve?
A41219What then if he will take to himself more power, or not perform what he is bound to?
A41219What then shall we say?
A41219When can such be wanting in turbulent minds?
A41219When shall the Prince be assured of safety?
A41219Whether to divest the King of the Power of Arms and to use them against him, be to defend his Person, Rights, and Dignity?
A41219and Whether that Case be now?
A41219be in Conscience perswaded, that this is such an unanimous, free, and generall consent, the judgement of the whole kingdome?
A41219had they this of resistence?
A41219hath he disclaimed his trust, or not upon all occasions promised justice and libertie to his Subjects?
A41219or take that sword out of his hand that God hath put into it?
A41219or the people then enslaved, what means had they for their Liberties?
A41219that the Prince hath his Power for the good of his people?
A41219was it any otherwise then by force and arms?
A41219were not the Kings then not onely conceived to be inclined so and so, but even actually were enemies to Religion, had overthrown Laws and Liberties?
A41219what security had the State by it?
A64086And, pray tell me, what difference is there between Madness, which is a Natural Disability and Tyranny, which is a moral incapacity to govern?
A64086Does not therefore Conquest of a Nation by Arms give the Conqueror a Power from God to Rule over that People without their Consents?
A64086F. But do we not also find in Scripture, that most of the great Kingdoms or Monarchies of the world have began from Conquest?
A64086F. But methinks this seems hard, and of evil consequence?
A64086F. But pray tell me, Sir, Is there any express Law for this Resistance; for indeed I could never hear of any such?
A64086F. But pray, Sir, tell me, as to the King, Is he not the sole Supream Power in England?
A64086F. But would not a Free Parliament be a much better Judge of these Violalations, than this general Body of the People?
A64086F. But, pray Sir, How can this be, since our late Statutes declare the King not to be subject to any Coercive Power of the Two Houses of Parliament?
A64086F. But, pray Sir, is there not an account given us in Scripture of Judges and Kings made by God''s own Appointment among the Iews?
A64086F. But, pray Sir, tell me who shall judge of these Violations, or what number may be allowed to rise and redress them?
A64086F. How then did it begin?
A64086F. Pray how could this be done, since the King may at this day dissolve the Parliament whenever he pleases?
A64086F. Pray then tell me, Sir, what is Civil Government?
A64086F. Pray whence then do Kings now- a- days derive their Power,( since God hath long since left off making any Kings by Divine Precept)?
A64086F. This is more than I ever heard of before; but pray proceed to tell me, what are the rest of the Liberties and Priviledges of an Englishman?
A64086GOOD Morrow Neighbour; What brings you hither so early?
A64086I. I grant it, if a Parliament may be had that were free and unbiass''d; but what if the King resolves not to call any?
A64086Or, what if he will not call one, till he thinks he can make or pack it according to his own mind?
A64086Pray what say you, Sir, to this?
A64086That King James having withdrawn himself out of the Kingdom, hath abdicated the Government?
A64086Was it by any Divine Precept, or else by the Consent of many men who had found the Inconveniencies of living without it?
A64086Whether Their Majesties Subjects taken at Sea acting by the Late King''s Commission might not be looked on as Pirates?
A64086Whether is it from God, or from the People?
A64086and Queen Elizabeth*: asked all the People standing below, Whether they would have this Person to be their King or Queen?
A64086and the Heirs of their Bodies?
A64086for to do this, I have heard, has been declared to be Treason?
A64086or can he ever cease to be King, or forfeit his Royal Dignity, if he acts never so Tyrannically?
A64086or else when the Persons commissioned are made by Law incapable of the King''s Commissions, as the Popish Officers lately were?
A64086or, if he does, will not give them leave to sit till they have redrest our Grievances?
A64086the Estates of the Kingdom, which is all one, as to declare the Throne to be vacant?
A64086whether from the very first Institution of the Government, or else by the gracious Concessions of our Kings?
A66109; It might perhaps be here no Improper Question, to ask, what this Gentleman means by so Warm an Application to the Whole Body of the Clergy?
A66109And Secondly, What it is to Impugn this Supremacy, within the meaning of this Canon?
A66109And for Others, give me leave to ask, only; Am I the First, of Our Order, that have appear''d on this Occasion?
A66109And that instead of Preserving, they shall Act so as to divide the Vnity of the Church?
A66109And was it Good Divinity then, and is it now no longer so?
A66109And what should I say more?
A66109But how if there be Dissention among them?
A66109But if I am not mistaken in Point of Law, what is it that deserves so Tragical an Outcry, as this late Author has made against me?
A66109But if both the Law be on my side; and it be no improper Enterprize for a Clergy- Man to appear in; What shall we say, more?
A66109But it may be General Councils have a Fashion by Themselves: Those Congregations may be called thus; but National or Provincial, such as Ours, How?
A66109But it may be this was some Imperial Power, and that the Emperours had, in this Point, more Jurisdiction than Kings?
A66109But still it may be doubted how far he accounts the King''s Supremacy to be Oppressive?
A66109But what say you to the 300 Years, before Constantine?
A66109But what then did they do, as to this Matter?
A66109But what then shall we say of all those Learned Bishops, and Clergy- Men, whose Books I have here Quoted to the same Purpose?
A66109Can he Remedy the Errors of a Synod, either in Doctrine, or Discipline?
A66109Did I take an Unseasonable Opportunity of Asserting this Authority?
A66109How shall we do for an Assembly?
A66109How then?
A66109How went Assemblies then?
A66109I quote Socrates for saying, that the Greatest Synods were called by the Emperors: Ergo, says he,''t is plain that the lesser Ones were not?
A66109Is it that I have Asserted the King''s Authority, over the Ecclesiastical Synods of this Church, and Realm?
A66109May he Assign them some Other Time or Place?
A66109May he in such a Case forbid them to Meet?
A66109Nay rather, what shall we say of those whole Convocations, who compiled our Articles, and Canons?
A66109Or Command them not to meddle with such Causes, or Persons, as he shall judge his Honour, or Interest, to be Concern''d in?
A66109Or coming, was there any One of them that did Protest against it; or pleaded the Churches Interest to meet of Themselves?
A66109Or do I stand Alone in this Cause?
A66109Or, because that can not be pretended; Did that Reverend Synod, which altered so many Other things, ever once touch upon this, and were stop''d in it?
A66109Shall not the Prince determine the Controversie, as Constantinus, Theodosius, and other Godly Emperours did?
A66109Shall we condemn them all?
A66109This was then God Divinity: And what Writer is there extant, of those Times, but it may be turn''d to in him?
A66109Was it then Usurped from Princes; and are, now, Princes Usurpers of it Themselves?
A66109Was the King but Licensed, for a while to hold this Power till another Clergy were in, and must he then be deprived of it again?
A66109Was the Time improper?
A66109Were all these wrong?
A66109What Gets the Magistrate by All this?
A66109What if He shall differ with them in His Notion of what is his Proper Honour and Interest?
A66109What if He shall think their Designs not to be so Pious as they pretend, but rather to have a great Allay of Humane Passion and Prejudice in them?
A66109What if what they call Ecclesiastical Concerns should chance to have an Influence upon Civil Affairs?
A66109What shall we say then?
A66109Why now taketh the Bishop of Rome this upon him?
A66109and continued by all his ⸪ Oppressing Successors of the Reform''d Religion; repealed by this Zealous, Church- Parliament?
A66109and in what Books they have done it?
A66109— But can the Magistrate call the Synod to Account for any thing they do?
A66109— Did any of them refuse to come being called by Him,( Constantine) as not called aright?
A70333And when Azariah, with fourscore valiant Priests, thrust out Uzziah, their lawful King, out of the Temple?
A70333And when King Charles the First assisted them with Men from England?
A70333And when King Charles the First, and the Bishops and Clergy of England assisted the Protestants of France?
A70333And when Mattathias slew the King''s Commissioner, for compelling Men to Idolatry?
A70333And when Queen Elizabeth assisted the Hollanders against their lawful Soveraign?
A70333And when Saul''s Subjects swore that Saul should not kill Jonathan; and they reseued him that he died not?
A70333And when he commanded the Door to be shut, and the Messenger to be held fast who was sent for his Head by the King of Israel?
A70333And when she assisted the Protestants of France, against their lawful Soveraigns Charles the Ninth, and Henry the Third?
A70333And when the Children of Israel slew Amasiah, their lawful King, for his Idolatry, without any appointment in Scripture, or prophecy of his Downfal?
A70333And when the Primitive Christians destroyed Julian''s Idolatrous Temple in his Reign?
A70333And when the Protestants joined with him upon his Arrival?
A70333And when the Protestants of Austria took up Arms, Anno 1608, against Matthias King of Hungaria, for denying them the free Exercise of their Religion?
A70333Can it be thought that God gave him an Absolute Authority of Life and Death over Man, who had not Authority to kill any Beast to satisfy his Hunger?
A70333Children, obey your Parents,& c. If Paternal Authority be an absolute Authority, I ask, Whether it be in the eldest of the Family?
A70333For if the King is not obliged to govern by those Laws that they make, to what purpose are the People to obey such Laws?
A70333He afterwards breaking his Oath and Promise, the Barons said, What shall we do with this wicked King?
A70333How could Adam be an Absolute Monarch, when God gave him the Herbs but in common with the Beasts?
A70333If Noah was Heir to Adam( I ask) which of Noah''s Sons was Heir to him?
A70333If a Government( say some) may be disturbed for any unlawful Proceedings of the Governour, or his Ministers, how can any Government be safe?
A70333Is it not as reasonable to believe, that God would have cursed Adam if he had killed his Son Abel, as Cain for killing him?
A70333Is it not reasonable and just I should have a right to destroy him who threatens me with Destruction?
A70333Nature and the Country, have not given such Authority?
A70333Then how can it be a Sin in a Nation to free themselves from an idolatrous and oppressing King?
A70333Then is it not better to obey the Laws, rather than the King?
A70333What is a Father to a Child more than another Person, when he endeavours to destroy him?
A70333Where was the Doctrine of Passive Obedience when the Edomites revolted from Jehoram, and made themselves a King?
A70333Where was the Doctrine of Passive Obedience, when Elisha prayed for Blindness to come upon those who were sent by the King of Syria to fetch him?
A70333Where was the Doctrine of Passive Obedience, when the Lutheran Churches defended themselves against the Emperor Charles the Fifth?
A70333Who can obey the King violating the Law?
A70333Who will or can refuse to give Aid to the Law when infringed?
A70333With what Face can any Man assert that Passive Obedience, without reserve, is the Doctrine of the Gospel?
A70333With what Folly and Ignorance do some assert, That the Kings of England are Absolute, as proceeding from William the Conqueror?
A70333With what Ignorance do some assert, that Adam was an Absolute Monarch, and that Paternal Authority is an Absolute Authority?
A70333and that Adam had a Monarchical, Absolute, Supream, Patornal Power?
A70333and that all Kingly Authority is a Fatherly Authority, and therefore irresistable?
A70333and that no Laws can bind the King, or annul this Authority?
A70333for that the Father of a Family governs by no other Law than by his own Will, and the Father is not to be resisted by his Child?
A70333if so, Whether a Grandfather can dispense with his Grand- Child''s paying the Honour due to his Parents by the fifth Commandment?
A70276And by them I protect you and your rights from violence, and what protection I pray can there be without strength?
A70276And what Forren Nation will do either of these to the King of England if he be Armless, and without a Sword?
A70276And what greater immunity and happinesse can there be to a Peeple, than to be liable to no Laws but what they make themselves?
A70276And would not this suffice?
A70276But Sir, I heard much of that Protestation, I pray what was the substance of it?
A70276But put case they were all Papists, must His Majesty therfore be held a Favourer of Popery?
A70276But what need I rove abroad so far?
A70276But, Sir, what shold be the reson which mov''d them to make that insolent proposall?
A70276Can your Parliament protect high Treason?
A70276Cui dabit partes scelus expiant Iupiter?
A70276How many Proclamations of pardon?
A70276How many overtures for an accommodation did he make?
A70276How often did he descend to acknowledg the manner of demanding the one and five Members in his publick Remonstrances?
A70276How they multiplied in every corner in such plenty, that one might say t ● … er was a superfaetation of lies, which continue unto this day?
A70276In naturall motions we find that the cause being taken away, the effect ceaseth, and will not this hold in civil Actions?
A70276Let the persons suffer in the Name of God, and not the holy Order of Episcopacy But good Lord, how pittifully were those poor Prelats handled?
A70276Peregrin ▪ Hath the house of Commons power to commit any but their own Members without conference with the Lords?
A70276Publick Faith also, though she had but newly set up for her self, is suddenly become Bankrupt, and how could she choose?
A70276The Masse?
A70276Touching grievances of any kind( and what State was ther ever so pure, but some corruption might creep into it?)
A70276Truly Sir, I never remember to have heard or read of such notable acts of grace and confidence from any King: but would not all this suffice?
A70276Was it ever known but a Soveraign Prince might use the bodies and strength of his own naturall- born Subjects, and Liege men for his own defence?
A70276Were ther any troubled for delivering their votes in the Houses?
A70276What palpable and horrid lies were daily printed?
A70276What reformed forein Church will acknowledg Him Defendor of the Faith, when they hear of this?
A70276Yet I believe ther was a pernicious plot to introduce a new Religion, but what I pray?
A70276and if ther was an errour in the proceedings, how oft did he desire his Great Councell to direct him in a course how to go on in the Empeachment?
A70276how can he defend either himself, or others?
A70276shall I believe the weakness ● … f our Religion to be such, as to be so easily ● … aken and overturn''d?
A70276to be subject to no contribution, assessement, or any pecuniary erogations whatsoever, but what they Vote, and voluntarily yeeld unto themselves?
A70276what did the Parliament for the King all this while?
A70276who will give any respect o ● … precedence to his Ambassadors, and Ministers of State?
A54581A: What do you here intend to refer to?
A54581According to those words in Malachi, If then I be a Father, where is my honour?
A54581And then having brought in his Popish opponents objection, Hem quid audio?
A54581And what is the Reason which the Iudges give of this Resolution?
A54581And will your Lordships allow this ecclesiastical Head no ecclesiastical Senses?
A54581But I should be glad to know whether it made any fermentation in the Body of the People Representative, and what was the Result of it?
A54581But doth that Explanation of the Regal Power assert any thing in Defence of the Dispensative part of it?
A54581But were not their Consciences extremely erroneous who thought themselves bound then to advance Religion by War?
A54581But will you then tell me of Disability being thus tacitly dispens''d with, and with a salvo to Conscience as to the obligation of humane Laws?
A54581But( I beseech you) did not the Protestant Divines of the Church of Scotland then cry out of the unlawfulness or inexpedience of that Dispensation?
A54581But( by the way) do you think then that Sovereign Princes offend the Law of God in Pardoning Murther?
A54581Can you guess whence it is that men have imbibed this mistaken fancy?
A54581Can you readily now at this time give any instance of the House of Commons th ● … n doing any thing of that Nature?
A54581Did Sir William Iones maintain the King''s Power of Dispensing with Acts of Parliament?
A54581Did the Parliament acquiesce in what the King had done as aforesaid?
A54581Did they offend any other Uncontroverted Rights of the Crown?
A54581Do you account it to have any great spreading Influence on mens Consciences here in keeping them both innocent and quiet?
A54581Have you this Matter of Fact out of any of the Records in England or Scotland?
A54581It seem''d very necessary in the judgment of our Governors then?
A54581No Ecclesiastical Persons to be censulted with at all?
A54581No not in any Circumstances of time and place?
A54581No?
A54581Or did the late Kings Loyal long Parliament do so in their obtaining the Act for the Habeas Corpus, and others that might be named?
A54581W ● … at account doth Mr. Prynne give of that?
A54581Was that Speech of the Archbishop ever printed?
A54581Was that all the favour he shew''d Roman- Catholicks?
A54581What a Concatenation of Perjuries was our Land so long enslaved with?
A54581What?
A54581Whether a mere Lay- man no Doctor of the Civil Law, may be a Bishop''s Register, contrary to an Act of Parliament?
A54581Whether a mere Lay- man, no Doctor of the Civil Law, may be a Bishop''s Chancellor, and so may Excommunicate?
A54581Whom do you mean by those?
A54581what had become of that great work of our Reformation in this flourishing Church of England?
A30561( many which now are arisen) and if upon any particular Sect and Sort, who are such more than others?
A30561And do not you proceed in the very path hereof?
A30561And for what Cause did God at the first ordain it?
A30561And if in Iudgment who are they to whom these things are so?
A30561And if therein it stand, whether do you believe in your Consciences that God shall Bless it, and Prosper it; or he shall Destroy it, and Confound it?
A30561And if your Government be not from this Ground and for this very End, shall it ever be blessed and happy, either to the Governors or Governed?
A30561And is it not your Duty so to do?
A30561And is not this the Iust Cause, wherefore the Lord hath suffered these Overturnings?
A30561And is not this the very End of Rule and Government, and Magistracy, at this very day?
A30561And ought you not to endeavour to stop this Flood of Wickedness that is broken out?
A30561And shall his dayes be many, or shall his time be short; if this be revealed to you let us know?
A30561And then how can you with good Conscience in the sight of God, Impose upon others, whenas your selves would not be Imposed upon in such a Case?
A30561And were not these things in the Iustice of the Lords Hand?
A30561And what are your Observations of the present proceedings?
A30561And whether it is not Gods only and alone Peculiar Priviledge to be Lord there; and not any man to impose one upon another in Spiritual Matters?
A30561And whether you believe not, that the Lord doth watch over you, with his eye that sees you, and marks all your wayes?
A30561And whether you do seriously Consider of this?
A30561And whether you your selves would be Imposed upon in such case?
A30561And will not the Lord require it of you, if you bring Innocent blood, and Cruel Sufferings upon your selves?
A30561Are the present Times and Seasons, and the proceedings, and transfactions in Mercy, or in Iudgment to the King, and his Subjects?
A30561If in Mercy, to whom is it Mercy?
A30561If some of you suffer, for that cause shall you have Peace with God in it, or is it for the name of Christ, as ye often say?
A30561If this be your work that you are called to, must it not go on till it be finished?
A30561Is it because you are more Righteous in the sight of God than they who are cast out before you; and because he loveth you, and hateth them?
A30561Lastly, What is your Iudgement;( if ye dare declare it) concerning the Times and Seasons, and the present motions of them?
A30561Nay, who of the Lords People shall not say, let the Lords will be done, and his Iustice Executed upon his Enemies?
A30561Or whether all of them, or no part of that Suffering, which hath been upon you, were any whit Iust as from the Lord?
A30561Or whether he may Tollerate none, but reduce the Government of the Church into the way of Bishops and Prelates, as it was in his Fathers dayes?
A30561Or whether he may Tollerate some and not all?
A30561Or whether or no it is just or unjust to God and men, that he should Reign King over these Nations?
A30561Or whether shall Peace or Trouble be in the Land in his dayes?
A30561Or whether upon any, or some pa ● icular Sects and Sorts of people?
A30561Or, whether or no any of you did believe it, or could have believed it by your great Faith which you profess, if it had been told you long ago?
A30561TO what do you Attribute the first Cause of the Advancement of this present Government?
A30561What do you believe of, and concerning LIBERTY of CONSCIENCE, in all Matters appertaining to the Kingdome of God?
A30561What is the very End of Rule and Government outward in this World?
A30561Whether do you consider, that the Lord looks for good fruit from you, and that you should free the Land from Oppression?
A30561Whether do you not believe it, and acknowledge it?
A30561Whether may it not be believed, that these things had never thus been brought to pass?
A30561Whether or no all that cry you up, and your Government, do it really, and out of good Conscience, and from Principles of Sincerity?
A30561Whether or no ye can judge that his Reign and Government shall be blessed to himself, and these Nations, or the contrary?
A30561Whether or no you do intend any Reformation from OLD Oppressions?
A30561Whether you, or any of you, do adjudge it Reasonable and Equitable, that he should come& inherit the Nations of which he is born the right Heir?
A30561Which of these may he do justly, and with more safety to himself, and happiness to his Government and Kingdoms?
A30561Whither may he justly forgive, or avenge himself, of his and his Fathers Enemies, and if he do avenge, whether or no can that be called persecution?
A30561for is not the hand of the Lord Stretched forth in Mercy, or in Iudgment accordingly as men walketh in his Fear, or without his Fear?
A30561or to good Fortune( as some call it?)
A30561whether upon this, or not, really consider; Was it not that Evil Doers might be Punished; And them that did well, might be Praised?
A56832A King?
A56832Admit that: But what necessitie may dispense with the violation of the Law of God?
A56832And are not many more ripe for the same Judgement, whose notorious Crimes have branded them for their respective Punishments?
A56832And did not you at the same instant by relative consequence, proclaime your selves Subjects?
A56832And did the Lord of the Sabbath dispence with a morall Law, for the preservation of an Oxes life, or an Asses?
A56832And is not disorder the mother of Anarchie?
A56832And was he not Proclaimed before he was crowned?
A56832And what is taking up of Armes, but an implyed supposition of at least equalitie?
A56832And when Judgement 〈 ◊ 〉, who is not troubled?
A56832And who is he?
A56832And, can that liberty produce any thing but an establisht disorder?
A56832And, tell me; whose power have his Adherents?
A56832And, who are they?
A56832Are their purses so apt to bleed to no end?
A56832Are you so strict in your Preparations, as to catechize every souldier?
A56832Barbarus has segetes?
A56832But what?
A56832But, admit Statutes may be broken, and you seeke to punish them; Who gave you the power so to doe?
A56832But, in case, your side should prosper, and prevaile, what then?
A56832But, when Kings and their assistance make an offensive, and a destructive warre against their Parliament, may they not then take up defensive Armes?
A56832But, whence proceeds all this?
A56832Can there be a stricter Precept?
A56832Did they encourage their Provinces to take up Arms for the defence of their Liberties or Religion?
A56832Did they endeavour by Scandals and impious Aspersions to render him odious to his people?
A56832Did they seize upon or stop his Revenues?
A56832God gave them, their Power, and who are thou that darest resist it?
A56832God joyned the King and his power, and who dare separate them?
A56832God or man?
A56832Gods Word answers your silly Objection, not I: was not Saul Gods Annoynted?
A56832Had not he as great an Interest in that Crown, as we have in this Common- wealth?
A56832Had the Sword been a necessary stickler in Reformation, how happened it that he mistook his weapon so?
A56832He that shall eat this Bread,& drink this cup of the Lord unworthily, eateth and drinketh, What?
A56832How many does this Army consist of?
A56832How many of these have counterfeited the honour of good Patriots, for largely contributing towards the Ruines of their Country?
A56832How many of these have lately chalenged the name of sanctified Vessels, for containing the poyson of unnaturall Sedition?
A56832How many of these have usurpt the stile of well- affected, for dis- affecting Peace?
A56832How stands he a Marke betwixt two dangers, having nothing left him but guile enough to make him capable of a desperate Fortune?
A56832If Subjects, ought they not to be subject?
A56832If not, who are they?
A56832If our blessed Saviour be not Representative, Tell me where of art thou a Member?
A56832If so, Is it of Doctrine, or of Discipline?
A56832If ye feare the alteration of the Old,( having your Soveraigns Oath, which you dare not beleeve) what other assurance can you have?
A56832Improbus haec tam culta novalia miles habebit?
A56832Nor was it want of strength, that he reformed not in a Martiall way: Could not he command more then twelve legions of Angels?
A56832Or had he pleased to use the Arme of flesh; could not he that raysed the dead, rayse a considerable Army?
A56832Or would they have slighted his gracious Offers?
A56832Or( being Rulers of the Province of Babel) did they invite the Jewes into a Rebellion?
A56832Or, having the proffer of a good Popish, or debaucht Commander, tell me, should he be denyed his Commission?
A56832Or, if such an( almost) unpreventable evill should not ensue, think you, such swarmes of Sectaries sweat for nothing?
A56832Or, is it a Truth ye want?
A56832Or, is it of Discipline?
A56832Or, to examine first every Officers Religion?
A56832Or,( having renounced his Subjects ayde, upon his fayle) could he expect that loyalty, which now he wants upon a meere suspition?
A56832Proclaimed?
A56832Sir John Hotham, then Governour of Hull, who first defyed and dared his Soveraigne to his face, what is become of him?
A56832So, He is tearmed a stumbling block, and does that warrant us to stumble?
A56832So, He sayes, All you shall be offended because of me; and does this patronize our Offences?
A56832The King a knowne Pagan commands grosse Idolatry, did these men conspire?
A56832The Law is good and just: Because then we had not knowne sinne but by the Law, is it therefore lawfull for us to sinne?
A56832The Law: And what Law denyes the King power to pardon Delinquents?
A56832The Lords Annoynted?
A56832The preservation of the old Truth, or the Institution of a New?
A56832Was not Cyrus Gods Annoynted, and many more whom God acknowledges so& yet wicked Kings?
A56832Was not God as able to subdue Him with so few, as to deliver them from so many?
A56832Was not He as tender- eyed towards his own naturall people, as we to one another?
A56832Was not He the great Reformer?
A56832Was not the Truth as deare to Him,( who was the verie Truth) and the way to it as direct to Him( that was the only Way) as to us?
A56832Were Plots, Policies, Propositions, Prophanations, Plunderings, Militatie Proparations, his way to Reformation?
A56832Were they not his owne words, He that taketh up the Sword, shall perish by the Sword?
A56832What Vices of the times have branded his Repute?
A56832What are the hopes of conquest but an Ambition of Superioritie?
A56832What interiour person would not think his Reputation wronged, not to take up considence upon such terrible termes?
A56832What is condemning, judging, or deposing, but Supremacie?
A56832What meane ye by having Truth?
A56832What notorious evill hath his Majesty perpetrated to quench the sparkles of a Common Charity?
A56832When the Lyon r ● ● res who trembles not?
A56832When you affronted Basing- house, was that defensive?
A56832When you besieged Redding, which you after slighted, was that defensive?
A56832When you shot five peeces of Ordnance, before one was returned at Edge- hill, was that defensive?
A56832Who limited it?
A56832Who, so bitterly inveighed against Episcopall Government, should be so shot dead out of a Cathedrall Church?
A56832Why was the penaltie, upon the faile, not expressed them?
A56832Will not their costs, and paines expect, at least, a congratulatory connivence in the freedome of their consciences?
A56832and that, of Ruine?
A56832did these to strengthen their own Faction, blast their Soveraignes Name with Tyranny and Faganisme?
A56832did they estrange themselves from his Presence?
A56832or annihilate his Power?
A56832or could there be a more impious Prince?
A56832who labouring to put out the left eye of establisht Government, his left eye, and life were both put out together?
A56832who was so severe an enemy against Peace should perish in the same Warre, ● e so encouraged?
A56832would then our Misertes be at an end?
A274541.4, 5. but unto Christ, and Kings?
A27454Afte ● whom doth Saul pursue?
A27454After a Flea?
A27454After a dead Dog?
A27454Am I robbed of all my money, because one thief takes it away?
A27454And now behold( then) Nebuchadonozers good subjects: will you hear what advice the Prophet Daniel gives them for all this?
A27454And to what place of Scripture can this nolite tangere be more aptly applyed, then to this, where we find the same words reiterated?
A27454Are these men good Subjects?
A27454By which of these two was CHARLES the First''s Head cut off?
A27454Descend into Hell and there is a Prince of Devils: and shall only man be Independent?
A27454Did bsalom do well to conspire again ● ● his Father, though he defiled Vriahs bed, and cloaked adultery with murther?
A27454For the first; if Religion be any thing pushed at, think you that Rebellion will keep it up, or that it ever stood in need of such hands?
A27454God hath delivered thine enemy into ● hine hand: what then?
A27454Goo ● God, have we thus learnt Christ?
A27454How did St. Paul exercise jurisdiction over Timothy and Titus, who were both Bishops?
A27454IF the Question be asked, whether the people doe make the King or not?
A27454If the people had made him themselves, or could make him, what needed they to have come unto Samuel, to bid him, make us a King to judge us?
A27454Is there any evil that I have not done it, saith the Lord?
A27454Is there no stroke but what the hand gives?
A27454Is this the fruit of so clear a Gospel?
A27454Or better advised than by him, who is the everlasting councellour?
A27454Or that any mans doctrine can settle us in more peace and quietness than he, who is princeps pa ● is, the Prince of peace?
A27454Paul, Timothy and Titus?
A27454There were no Lord Bishops in those daies?
A27454This is the day whereof the Lord said unto thee, I will deliver thine Enemy into thine hand, and thou shalt do unto him( what?)
A27454Those who ruled well were to be accounted worthy of double honour, and will you not allow them a single Lordship?
A27454Was not Christ a Diocesan Bishop?
A27454Where do you find that Christ gave the Sacrament to any but his Disciples?
A27454Who can stretch forth his hand against the Lords Anointed, and be guiltless?
A27454and Gods words unto Aaron at his setting him apart for the High Priests Office?
A27454and am I not rob''d because six or seven lay hold upon me?
A27454and have we not found it so, if we consider the behaviour of our new made Presbyterians in England, to Charles the first, his Son?
A27454and how did these two Bishops exercise jurisdiction over all the Ministers of Creet and Ephesus?
A27454and lighten our eyes( what, with new Revelations how they may be reveng''d?
A27454and shall the Ministers of the same Gospel be less glorious?
A27454and the retu ● n of all our holy mothers care, and pains for Education?
A27454and to say, give us a King?
A27454and was not the World his Diocess?
A27454and why are they angry with the word Priest?
A27454because the true receiving of the Communion, is the receiving of the body, and blood of Christ by faith; therefore shall we have no bread and wine?
A27454both these, all the Ministers in Creet and Ephesus?
A27454deserve well and have well; shall we receive good from the hands of the Lord, and shall we not receive evil Princes?
A27454did ever any record above seven years date, call it making of Ministers?
A27454did he not protest unto his Son Henry, that he mislik''d their proud and haughty carriage ever since he was ten years of age?
A27454did he not say that Monarchy and Presbytery agreed like God and the Devil?
A27454did they not convene him diverse times before them, school him, Catechize him like a School- boy?
A27454drink ye all of this, but they were all Apostles to whom he said so?
A27454if the child be thus ignorant, what doth the childs getting up upon the Gyants shoulders advantage the child in points of controversie?
A27454insomuch that it made Hasael himself( when he was told thereof) cry out, is thy servant a Dogg, that he should do all these things?
A27454may we not have the signs, and the things signified also?
A27454must not the child ask the Gyant what is what, of all that he beholds?
A27454must prayers and tears be turned into Pike and Musket because a Nero is thy Governour?
A27454or the Children of this generation to be wiser than the Fathers of old?
A27454shall Elias entice Ahabs subjects to Rebellion, because he suffered Jezabel to put Naboth to death, and killed the Lords Prophets?
A27454shall Issachar not be numbred amongst the other twelve, because he was none of the wisest?
A27454shall Judah be depose ● from his rule and government for making a bargain with an Harlot upon the high way?
A27454shall Peter take vengeance upon Herod because he put him in prison, beheaded John the Baptist, and killed James?
A27454shall Reuben be no Patriarch, because he was unstable as water?
A27454shall sensus factus thrust our sensus destinatus out of Scriptures?
A27454shall we take Gods word into our mouths and preach Sedition, Rebellion and Insur ● ection, contrary to that word which we pretend to preach?
A27454therefore did the Citizens do well to do evil, because the Lord said, I did it?
A27454therefore is not the Sacrament given unto them Jure Divino, because the words were left out in the conveyance?
A27454to wage War against him?)
A27454was not this by Divine Institution?
A27454were not Timothy and Titus Diocesan Bishops, when Creet and Ephesus were allotted to be their Diocess?
A27454were not the Apostles Diocesan Bishops, when the whole World, divided into twelve parts, were their twelve Diocess?
A27454what Lord or Gentleman will live within your walls?
A27454what liberty is there in having freedom in the State, and none in the condition?
A27454where did you find that Christ administred the Sacrament, or commanded it to be administred unto any Lay- men, or women?
A27454who cast down his Throne, by taking away his Negative voice, was it not the Presbyterians?
A27454will we suffer our s ● lves to be cozene ● with the g ● lded slips of error?
A27454will you have more Orthodox Fathers than the Apostles?
A5979321, 22, 23 v. Art thou called, being a servant?
A59793And allow that saying of David to be Scripture still, Who can stretch forth his hand against the Lord''s Anointed, and be guiltless?
A59793And as for the new Covenant, where does that grant any new franchises and liberties to subjects?
A59793And how could so innocent a person die, but by the hands of unjust and Tyrannical powers?
A59793And the cup which my Father has given me, shall I not drink it?
A59793And what follows from hence?
A59793And who were these powers St. Peter resisted?
A59793But does not the Apostle expresly tell them, Ye are bought with a price, be not ye the servants of men?
A59793But how should these subordinate Governours come by this power to resist their Prince?
A59793But how then shall the Scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be?
A59793But now is it likely, that if David had had any designe to have fortified Keilah against Saul, he would have been afraid of the men of the Citie?
A59793But was the Doctrine of resistance more scandalous ▪ than the Doctrine of the Cross?
A59793But what follows from hence?
A59793But what is it they would prove from these words?
A59793But what is this now to us?
A59793But what now is all this to subjection to Soveraign Princes?
A59793But would it not also have made more converts?
A59793But you will say, What is this to such an absolute subjection to Princes as includes Non- resistance in it?
A59793By him?
A59793By what Law then?
A59793Can there be no wise reason given, why God may advance a bad man to be a Prince?
A59793Did his doing well, make it ill for us to do as he did?
A59793Did they think this so scandalous a Doctrine, that they were afraid or ashamed to publish it to the world?
A59793Does he set any narrower bounds or limits, than what the Heathen Princes challenged?
A59793Does the Apostle exhort the Christians too to throw off the civil powers?
A59793For indeed, can any thing be plainer than our Saviour''s answer?
A59793For indeed, how can people, who have no power of Government themselves, give that power, which they have not?
A59793For is the power of victorious Rebels and Usurpers from God?
A59793For what authoritie has a wicked and persecuting Law?
A59793For what does the discontent of the greatest Ministers signifie, who can raise no forces to oppose their Prince?
A59793For what glory is it, if when ye be buffeted for your faults, ye take it patiently?
A59793For when they had chose a King, did God cease to be the King of Israel?
A59793How does it follow, that because Princes are chose by the people, therefore they derive their power from them, and are accountable to them?
A59793How now does David behave himself in this extremity?
A59793How then can you prove from the duty of praying for Kings, that it is in no case lawful to resist them?
A59793My other question is this, Whether a Prince have any more authority to make wicked and persecuting Laws, than to persecute without Law?
A59793Now how does the death of Christ, by expiating our sins, deliver us from subjection to our civil Governours?
A59793Now what is it, that makes the person of a King more inviolable and unaccountable than other men?
A59793Now why should he entertain these men, but to defend himself against the forces of Saul?
A59793Or that Christ, when he made us free, did deliver us from the subjection of men?
A59793Shall he who was so famous for miracles, who gave eyes to the blind, and feet to the lame?
A59793Tell us therefore, what thinkest thou?
A59793The Apostle tells us, that the King is supreme; but over whom is he supreme?
A59793The Case of mixt Communion: Whether it be Lawful to Separate from a Church upon the account of promiscuous Congregations and mixt Communions?
A59793Therefore?
A59793This example Iezebel threatned Iehu with: Had Zimri peace, who slew his master?
A59793What can be said more expresly against resistance than this?
A59793What course does he take to secure himself from Saul?
A59793What shall it profit a man, though he should gain the whole world, which is something more than a single Crown and Kingdom, and loose his own Soul?
A59793Whence then does an illegal act or Judgement derive its authoritie and obligation?
A59793Where the word of a King is, there is power; and who may say unto him, What dost thou?
A59793Whether God can not by a great many unknown ways, determine the choice of the people, to that Person, whom he has before chosen himself?
A59793Whether God does nothing, but what he does by an immediate power?
A59793Whether he can not appoint and choose an Emperor, unless he does it by a Voice from Heaven, or sends an Angel to set the Crown upon his head?
A59793Whether the Laws of God and Nature be not as sacred and inviolable as the Laws of our Country?
A59793Which is the greatest and most merciless Tyrant?
A59793Who are most likely to abuse their power?
A59793Why he was born of mean and obscure parents, and chose a poor and industrious life, and an accursed and infamous death?
A59793Will you lift up your hand against God?
A59793Would this have offended Princes, and make them more implacable enemies to Christianitie?
A59793a Covetous and Rapacious Prince, or an insolent Army, and hungry Rabble?
A59793a Nero or Dioclesian, or a pitcht Battel?
A59793an Hereditary Prince, or the People, who are fond of innovations?
A59793an arbitrary and lawless Prince, or a Civil War?
A59793and can any thing be a Doctrine of the Gospel, which is truly scandalous?
A59793and did he not receive the Laws and Rules of Government from him?
A59793and does our praying for them, make it unlawful to resist and oppose their unjust violence?
A59793and how can this be maintained, but by a Revenue proportionable to the expence?
A59793and how soon would this have made the Doctrine of Non- resistance useless and out of date, by making Christians powerful enough to resist?
A59793and who gave it this authoritie?
A59793are we not bound to pray for all our Enemies and Persecutors?
A59793by God?
A59793by whom?
A59793can not we pray for any man, without making him our absolute and Soverain Lord?
A59793did Oliver Cromwell receive his power from God?
A59793does it hence follow, therefore we may resist and oppose them, if they do?
A59793does not he know how to rule us?
A59793for can the Apostle be thought absolutely to condemn resistance, if he makes it only unlawful to resist when we want power to conquer?
A59793how does an illegal sentence pronounced by a Judge, come to have any Authoritie?
A59793how to chuse a Prince for us?
A59793is it lawful to give Tribute to Caesar, or not?
A59793is not the Prince as much bound to observe the Laws of God and Nature, as the Laws of his Country?
A59793or ask him, Why hast thou done so?
A59793or of whose hands have I received any bribe to blind mine eyes therewith?
A59793or whom have I defrauded?
A59793or whose Ass have I taken?
A59793some illegal Taxes, or Plunderings, Decimations, and Sequestrations?
A59793that Non- resistance is no duty, because it may possibly be attended with evil consequences?
A59793that our subjection to men is inconsistent with our freedom in Christ?
A59793the Prince, or the people?
A59793to be the slaves and Vassals, the scorn and the Triumph of insolent Tyrants?
A59793was it impossible for Infinite wisdom to have laid a more glorious and triumphant scene of our redemption?
A59793was not the King God''s Anointed?
A59793was not their King Gods Minister and Vicegerent, as their Rulers and Judges were before?
A59793was there no possible way, but the condescension and sufferings of his own Son?
A59793were we born for this very end, to suffer death by Herods and Pontius Pilates?
A59793what agreement is there between civil government, and publick Justice and a Tyrant?
A59793what authoritie has any Prince to make Laws against the Laws of God?
A59793wherefore?
A59793which is the greatest oppression of the Subject?
A59793which will destroy most mens Lives?
A59793who is most likely to make a change and alteration in government?
A59793who will devour most Estates?
A59793whom have I oppressed?
A59793will you cast off his authority and government too?
A271151.4, 5. but unto Christ, and Kings?
A271155 ● This is the day wherof the Lord said unto thee, I will deliv ● r thine Enemy into thine hand, an ● thou shalt doe unto him( what?)
A27115An Eagle reneweth her age, saith David, David saith so, and therefore you must believe it: but how it is done?
A27115And now behold( then) Nebuchadonozers good subjects: will you hear wat advice the Prophet Daniel gives them for all this?
A27115Bayly, Thomas, d. 1657?
A27115Bayly, Thomas, d. 1657?
A27115By which of these two was CHARLS the First''s Head cut off?
A27115Descend into Hell and there is a Prince of Devils: and shall only man be Independent?
A27115Did Absolon doe well to conspire against his Father, though he defiled Vriahs bed, and cloaked adultery with murther?
A27115Do you not see that the Parliament can not bring any thing to maturity, and what''s the reason?
A27115For the first, if Religion be any thing push''d at, think you that Rebellion will keep it up, or that it ever stood in need of such hands?
A27115God hath delivered thine Enemy into thine hand: what then?
A27115Good God, have we thus learnt Christ?
A27115Hath God refused the soft voice to remaine in thunder?
A27115IF the question be asked, whether the people doe make the King or not?
A27115If for Religion we have fought all this while, when did the Church change her weapons?
A27115If the Ministration of the Law be glorious, shall not the Ministration of the Gospel be much more glorious?
A27115If we Fight for our Liberties, what Liberties are they that we Fight for?
A27115If we fought for the Laws of the Land, whose Laws are they?
A27115Is it ● awfull to give tribute to Cesar or not?
A27115Is there any euil ● hat I have not done it, saith the Lord?
A27115Is there no stroke but what the hand gives?
A27115Is this the fruit of so clear a Gospel?
A27115Paul, T ● mothy and Titus?
A27115The two Houses gave out that they fought in defence of the Kings Person, Crown and Dignity, do ye beleeve them?
A27115There were no Lord Bishops in those daies?
A27115Those who ruled well were to be accounted worthy of double honour, and will you not allow them single Lordship?
A27115Was ever Prince put to death by two such hands?
A27115Was not Christ a Diocesan Bishop?
A27115Where do you find that Christ gave the Sacrament to any but his Disciples?
A27115Who can stretch forth ● ● s hand against the Lords Anointed ● ● d be guiltlesse?
A27115after a Flea?
A27115after a dead Dog?
A27115after whom doth Saul pursue?
A27115am I robbed of all my money, because one thief takes it away?
A27115and Gods words unto Aaron at his setting him a part for the High Priests office?
A27115and am I not rob''d because six or seven layes hold upon me?
A27115and have we not found it so, if we consider the behaviour of our new mad ● Presbyterians in England to Charls the Frist his Son?
A27115and how did these two Bishops exercise jurisdiction over all the Ministers of Creet and Ephesus?
A27115and lighten our eyes( what, with new revelations how they may be reveng''d?
A27115and shall the Ministers of the same Gospel be lesse glorious?
A27115and the return of all our holy mothers care, and paines for education?
A27115and to what place of Scripture can this nolite tangere be more aptly applied, then to this, where we find the same words reiterated?
A27115and to 〈 ◊ 〉, give us a King?
A27115and what successe( I pray you) had the imprisonment of Richard the 2?
A27115and why are they angry with the word Priest?
A27115and will he now be contented to have his Church repaired, and her breaches made up with skuls and carkasses?
A27115and will you believe them still?
A27115are they not supporters of that body politick whereof he is the head?
A27115are they not the Kings?
A27115because the true receiving of the Communion, is the receiving of the Body, and Bloud of Christ by faith; therefore shall we have no bread and wine?
A27115both these, all the Ministe ● ● in Creet and Ephasus?
A27115deserve well and have well; shall we receive good from the hands of the Lord, and shall we not receive evil Princes?
A27115did God refuse to have his Temple built by David a man after his own heart, because only his hands were bloudy?
A27115did ever any record above seven years date call it making of Ministers?
A27115did he not protest unto his Son Henry, that he mislik''d their proud and haughty carriage ever since he was ten years of age?
A27115did he not say that Monarchy and Presbytery agreed like God and the Devil?
A27115did they not convene him diverse times before them, school him, Chatechize him like a school- boy?
A27115do n''t ye believe the King did?
A27115drike ye all of this, but they were all Apostles to whom he said so?
A27115had not the whole Kingdom a shrewd fit of an ague then?
A27115have not they given themselves the lie?
A27115have they not fought then all this while upon a false ground?
A27115how did Saint Paul exercise jurisdiction over Timothy and Titus who were both Bishops?
A27115if for Liberty of Conscience, what doe you meane thereby?
A27115if the child be thus ignorant, what doth the childs getting up upon the Gyants shoulders advantage the child in points of controversie?
A27115is there one remaining of the name of Mortimer?
A27115may we not have the signes, and the things signified also?
A27115must bloud be tempered with morter that must bind the stones of his Temple in Vnity?
A27115must not the child aske the Gyant what is what, of all that he beholds?
A27115must not the child be informed by the knowing Gyant, of the difference between the mountaines& the vallies, the water and the skie, a cock& a bull?
A27115must prayers and tears be turned into pike and musket?
A27115nay, doth he not maintaine himself when he maintaineth them?
A27115or are the smitings of brethren, strokes fit to pollish her stones withall?
A27115or better advised then by him, who is the everlasting councellour?
A27115or hath his spirit left the gentle posture of descending downe upon his Apostles, to the approaching of a mighty and rushing winde?
A27115or that any mans doctrine can settle us in more peace and quietnesse then he, who is princeps pacis, the Prince of peace?
A27115or the Children of this generation to be wiser then the Fathers of old?
A27115or was it at Carisbrook- Castle in the Isle of Wight?
A27115shall Elias entice A ● abs subjects to Rebellion, because he suffered Jezebell to put Naboth to death, and killed the Lords Prophets?
A27115shall Issacher not be numbred amongst the other twelve, because he was none of the wisest?
A27115shall Judith be deposed from his rule and government for making a bargain with a Harlot upon the high way?
A27115shall Peter take vengeance upon Herod because he put him in prison, beheaded John the Baptist, and killed James?
A27115shall Reuben be no Patriarch, becuse he was unstable as water?
A27115shall sensus factus thrust out sensus destinatus out of the Scriptures?
A27115shall we take Gods word into our mouthes and preach Sedition, Rebellion and Insurrection, contrary to that word which we pretend to preach?
A27115so am I: and in all these things I have laboured more abundantly then you all; where lies the quarrell then?
A27115so am I: are you for the Laws of the Land?
A27115so am I: are you for the Liberties of the Subject?
A27115so am I: are you for the priviledges of Parliament?
A27115so am I: are you for the properties of estates?
A27115that it doth one, is no argument but that it may do both: God made all things, in number, weight, and measure, and will you ● ● ● ike his word?
A27115the Parliament said they ● ought only to bring him to his Parliament, was the Parliament at Holmeby house?
A27115therefore did the Citizens do well to do evill, because the Lord said, I did it?
A27115therefore is not the Sacrament given unto them Jure Divino, because the words were left out in the conveyance?
A27115to wage war against him?)
A27115was he in honour, or was he dignified by being there?
A27115was not that Mortimer, who was the cause of his Imprisonment, beheaded?
A27115was not this by divine institution?
A27115were not all those who had a hand in it condignly punished?
A27115were not ● imothy and Titus Diocesan Bishops, when Creet and Ephasus were alotted to be their Dioces?
A27115were 〈 ◊ 〉 the Apostles Diocesan Bishops, when ● ● e whole world, divided into twelve 〈 ◊ 〉, were their twelves Dioces?
A27115what Lord or Gentleman will live within your wals?
A27115what liberty is there in having freedome in the State, and none in the condition?
A27115where did you find that Christ administred the Sacrament, or commanded it to be administred unto any Lay- men, or women?
A27115who cast down his Throne by taking away his Negative voice, was it not the Presbyterians?
A27115will he not maintaine his leggs under him?
A27115will he not maintaine the foundation of his house from sinking?
A27115will we suffer our selves to be cosened with the guilded slips of errour?
A27115will you have more Orthodox Fathers then the Apostles?
A27115● as, Quis potest?
A27115● nd was not the world his Dioces?
A33908''T is well for the Doctor''s Ancestors, he did not ask them what Right they had to be his Ancestors?
A33908And can the Doctor find in his Heart to quarrel with Mr. Hobs after all this harmony in Opinion?
A33908And can the Dr. deny these Advantages to the Usurpers upon K. Charles II?
A33908And does God put his own People upon all these intolerable Inconveniencies?
A33908And does not the Doctor say the same in other Words?
A33908And have they a Right to his House as soon as they can turn him out?
A33908And how a Man can have any Authority, who has no Right to ground it upon; or to give him a publick Character?
A33908And is all this nothing?
A33908And is he certain the Hebrews were troubled with none of these?
A33908And is not their Reformation a sufficient Redress of the Peoples Grievances?
A33908And is not this a sufficient meaning?
A33908And is the Doctor offended at this?
A33908And is the Property of Crowns more precarious, and slenderly guarded than that of a Cottage?
A33908And ought we therefore to conclude, that God''s Laws, which provide against these Mischiefs, are either defective or unreasonable?
A33908And pray does not the Doctor do the same?
A33908And that the Devil would not have used Iob thus hardly, if he had not been over ruled by God Almighty?
A33908And were not Iaddus and his Countrymen admirable Subjects at this rate?
A33908And what Countrymen were the Romans?
A33908And what Law is there to chuse a Prince in an Hereditary Kingdom?
A33908And what follows?
A33908And what has the Dr. to say to all this?
A33908And what made him think so then?
A33908And who can now deny him the Title of a Providential Monarch?
A33908And who gave them this Authority?
A33908And who would venture an Execution only for Robbing himself?
A33908And why all these hard Words?
A33908And why must that Usage be put upon Princes, which, if it was offer''d a private Person, would be thought a great Injury?
A33908And will our Author say, That all this was brought to pass by the Influence and Direction of Providence?
A33908And, Is not the Maintenance of Right and the Defence of the Constitution, the Tryal of Integrity, and the giving a noble Example, a very good End?
A33908Are not Bishops de Facto as good as Kings of that Denomination?
A33908Are such Revolutions occasion''d by those Principles which condemn them?
A33908Are the Subjects bound to restore him?
A33908Are they at Liberty to stand neuter?
A33908Are they not bound to defend a Divine Right, which he grants is never parted from Possession?
A33908As for his Flourish with the word Estates, I question whether it will do him any service; for, Who made them Estates?
A33908As for the Text which he cites from Amos, shall there be Evil in a City, and the Lord has not done it?
A33908At present I only desire to know, Whether God loves Peace more than Justice?
A33908Because the Doctor has lead the the way?
A33908Besides, what need was there of a supernatural Direction for the Resolution of a plain Case?
A33908But Fourthly, Is the Doctor sure that the Apostle to the Hebrews knew that their Spiritual Rulers were all Lawfully constituted?
A33908But does not Iosephus say, Iaddus was extremely concern''d how he should meet the Macedonians?
A33908But here he makes a distinction without a difference; for, are not all Entails grounded upon Law, Divine upon Divine, and Human upon Human Laws?
A33908But how long is this Maintenance and Owning to last?
A33908But how long was this Allegiance to last?
A33908But is the Doctor sure the People are at Liberty, not to assist a Prince when he does not please them?
A33908But the Legality of Princes Titles, is a great Dispute among Learned Men; and how then should Unlearned Men understand them?
A33908But what can the minor part of the Subjects, perhaps but a little handful, do towards the restoring their King?
A33908But what if he Strikes at Religion?
A33908But what if the Four Monarchies were not at an End?
A33908But what if the Usurper wo n''t let the Subjects have the Priviledge of their Countrey without these Conditions?
A33908But what is the Penalty the Doctor lays upon Princes, if they do n''t give Satisfaction?
A33908But which way does the Great Body of the Nation absolve themselves from these Oaths?
A33908But why could those Princes never have a Legal Right over the Israelites?
A33908But why his Government?
A33908But why is the contrary Doctrin so dangerous to the Subject?
A33908But why will he not endure them?
A33908But, in Answer to the Doctor''s Demand, I desire to know of him, whether our Ancestors have not a Right to Govern us?
A33908But, pray who says Hereditary Right is the only Ground of the Relation between King and Subject?
A33908By Law?
A33908By what Authority do they these things?
A33908Can Unlearned Men understand nothing about which the Learned differ?
A33908Can a Crowd give a man a Dispensation purely by the Magick of their numbers, and the Disorder of their Meeting?
A33908Can not Providence dispose of Kingdoms without their Leave?
A33908Can the Doctor deny that Subjects are bound to assist their Prince in all just Quarrels?
A33908Can they not do it Lawfully?
A33908Can they rendezvouz themselves into Independency?
A33908Did he order and decree the Revolt of those glorious Spirits, and over- rule them into damnation?
A33908Did his infinite Wisdom fix the Government upon the most incomprehensible Basis?
A33908Did we swear Allegiance to the Country, or has it any Authority over us independent of the King?
A33908Do n''t Men frequently ruine their Health and their Fortunes, and make themselves miserable, by their Vices?
A33908Do they not say it was unlawful for Iaddus to have born Arms, or to have solicited any others to a Revolt?
A33908Do they not say then that God removes, and sets up Kings?
A33908Does God hate Injustice in private Persons, and permit it at the same time to whole Communities?
A33908Does God need the Wickedness of Men to bring his own Counsels to pass?
A33908Does God suffer nothing but what he sees fit to be done?
A33908Does God use to oblige Men to determine Disputes above their Capacity; to lead them into Labyrinths of History, and Perplexities of Conscience?
A33908Does Providence and Government signifie only His Permission?
A33908Does he not suffer all the Wickedness which is committed, for no Man can do an ill Thing whether God will or no?
A33908Does it therefore follow that we must joyn such a prosperous Rebellion; and support it with our Interest?
A33908Does the Authority of a Father last no longer than the Children are pleased to obey him?
A33908Does the Choice of the People, though altogether Illegal, give them the advantage of this Character?
A33908Does the Dr. think no Prince will endure a Man that has any Principles of Conscience?
A33908Does their Number and Quality make them such?
A33908Farther, I must ask him the old Question over again; Whether this National Submission must be Legal or Illegal?
A33908Farther, Was not the destroying Iob''s Cattle and Servants, and the afflicting his Person, an Event?
A33908For do n''t we read that the Devils besought our Saviour that he would suffer them to enter into the Herd of Swine, and he suffered them?
A33908For may not Men make a Recognition of their Duty, and give fresh Assurances to perform that which they were obliged to before?
A33908For unless the Chapters and Canons are to be understood alike; to what purpose is the History premised in the one, and repeated in the other?
A33908For what does this legal Right signifie?
A33908For why should a Man restore that which he is vested in by a Divine Right?
A33908For, by way of Quere, I would gladly know, how there can be a Government without any Authority to administer Acts of Government?
A33908For, under Favor, are not the States bound by natural and sworn Allegiance to their King?
A33908Fourthly, We must Pray for an Unsettled Prince;( that is an Usurper in his own Sense) under the Name and Title of King: Why so?
A33908Had they not Power and Possession on their side?
A33908Has the Prince Resigned or given a Discharge under the Broad Seal?
A33908Have private Rights a firmer Establishment than the publick?
A33908Have they the Liberty to comply, or must they submit to the Penalty?
A33908Have we any Legislative Brick and Stone?
A33908He has a Right it''s granted as much as ever; say you so?
A33908How can that be, when it''s supposed in the Dispute, That he has neither Legal nor Divine Authority?
A33908How could that be?
A33908How does the Dr. know, but that the Rumpers had a National Consent for secluding these Members?
A33908However I desire to be resolved this Question, Would God have a Right to govern the World if he was not Omnipotent?
A33908However, at present, he will not be thus Liberal: For if the Subjects have a bad Prince, who notoriously violates their Rights; What follows?
A33908However, may not God make whom he pleases King without regard to Legal Rights?
A33908I will only ask him, What he thinks of the Rebellion in Heaven?
A33908I would gladly know what the Dr. means by being expresly enjoyned by the Laws of Nature: Has the Dr. any of Nature''s Volumes by him?
A33908If He did, who was it He governed by?
A33908If Power will govern and is a certain sign of God''s Authority, to what purpose are the States convened?
A33908If he had thought it Lawful to submit, why did he not do it before?
A33908If he has not command enough of his Conscience to conquer all these Scruples, what Relief can the Dr. give him?
A33908If not, why should we esteem Multitudes above Justice, and side with the Subject against the Soveraign?
A33908If private Disobedience ca n''t challenge a Divine Right to govern upon Success, why should a National Rebellion pretend to it?
A33908If the Case be thus, What is the Reason of his sending word that he could not submit as long as Darius lived?
A33908If their Precedents and Conclusions hold only for the Kings of Iudah, to what purpose are they brought?
A33908If they have, can they not keep it as well as they did their former one?
A33908If they have, why may they not assign over their Jurisdiction, and choose a Governor for us?
A33908If they may renounce their Active Obedience, Why not their Passive too?
A33908If they must be confined to Temporal Powers, why are they not capable of a farther Limitation?
A33908If we are unconcerned in them, why are they couched into Canons and Principles, and reported with that particularity and exactness?
A33908In a submissive petitioning way?
A33908In what manner?
A33908Indeed why should they not submit?
A33908Is a Wife bound to entertain an Husband de Facto?
A33908Is it Folly to think any Prince will endure such things?
A33908Is it an Unhappiness to value our Honour and Integrity above our Lives, and to expire in Constancy and Greatness?
A33908Is it because they are Personal?
A33908Is it between the Lawful Prince and the Usurper?
A33908Is it the Meaning of the Oath, that we should desert our Prince in his Distress, and refuse him when he has most occasion for our Service?
A33908Is not God''s Authority in a bad Prince( supposing he was really such) as much as in a good one?
A33908Is not this a much more accountable Method, than to resign up our Consciences to Violence, and impetuous Accidents, and to make Treason our Oracle?
A33908Is not, says he, the late King, with his Heirs and Successors, dispossessed by God?
A33908Is there any Reason the Creditor should forfeit, for the Insufficiency or Knavery of the Debtors?
A33908It''s not amiss to ask upon whose account the Appearance of Government is to be secured under an Usurpation?
A33908It''s not at all material as to the Dispute in hand, Whether the Divine Authority affects the Laws of Princes immediately or mediately?
A33908May they not transfer their Right to Resistance, without any Limitation of Conditions?
A33908Might they so?
A33908Must the Laws be broken, and Justice be banished, that people may live at ease in their Sins, and enjoy the Advantages of Rebellion?
A33908Must they not be disturbed, left they should repent and be saved, and for fear Honest Men should have their own again?
A33908Nay, why should they believe any Religion at all, since there are several Learned Atheists who deny it?
A33908Now I desire to know whether the New Man is a Bishop, and has a Divine Right to govern the Diocese?
A33908Now did God raise a Commotion in his own Kingdom?
A33908Now if he was so entirely satisfied about his new Master, why did he risque his Affairs at this rate, and stand off till Alexander was just in view?
A33908Now if the Priviledge of Fathers and Husbands holds in Case of Dispossession, why not that of Kings?
A33908Now is not the taking a Purse, or stealing a Man''s Cloaths, an Event?
A33908Now, what does the Dr. bring to confute himself, and the Reverend Dean, and the Inference I have drawn from them?
A33908Or are they not punished if they are damned for oppressing their Subjects?
A33908Or does a Divine Right depend upon humane Forms and Solemnities?
A33908Or does the Doctor believe it lawful for a Governor of a Town to surrender as soon as he hears the Enemy is approaching?
A33908Or, by the People, who desert or break in upon their Principles?
A33908Or, does the House work by way of Steams and Exhalations, as the Oracle at Delphos is said to have done?
A33908Or, does the nature of Subjection leave them at Discretion, and bind no longer ▪ than they see convenient?
A33908Particularly, did God Govern in England, Scotland,& c. from 1648, to 1660?
A33908Right: But, under Favour, did they do well or ill in absolving themselves?
A33908Sixthly, I would gladly know the Doctor''s reason why Title and Legality must always be expected in Sacred, but not in Civil Authority?
A33908That is, though Lucifer were at the head of it, we ought to give him Provender, and bring our Money in the Sacks Mouth?
A33908Therefore if Possession gives a Divine Right in one case, why not in the other?
A33908They can wait God Almighty''s leisure, retain their Integrity, and save their Souls: And is all this nothing?
A33908This is a severe Charge; How does he purge himself?
A33908Was Iaddus assured that Alexander could not march his Forces to Ierusalem as long as Darius was living?
A33908Was it their way to make the Bishop vote against the Lord; and not only clash with the State, but with themselves?
A33908Were they not Foreigners?
A33908What Authority does the Doctor bring to shew the Emperor''s Titles defective?
A33908What Right have the Members to depose the Head, and Inferiors to displace their Supreme?
A33908What a mortal Obstinacy was this?
A33908What does he think of the Kingdom of Satan, is not that called the Power of Darkness?
A33908What if he has an aversion to Violence, and hates to strengthen the Workers of Iniquity?
A33908What if he is afflicted to see a brave, a generous, and good- natur''d Prince so deeply injured?
A33908What if it is enjoyned us by undeniable Consequence, is not that sufficient without a plain Text?
A33908What if they have an Inclination to Murther, or Adultery, does the Universality of the Consent make such Practices innocent and warrantable?
A33908What if they should willingly submit to the setting up the Alcoran?
A33908What is more common in Religion, and Civil Conversation, than to renew former Engagements, by repeated Promises, and Solemnities of Action?
A33908What made him delay it to the last minute, and give a needless Provocation to the Conqueror?
A33908What reason has an Usurper, who has neither Humane nor Divine Authority, to make himself a Iudge, and a Ruler over Men?
A33908What sort of Dispute does the Dr. mean, and between whom does it lye?
A33908What wonder is it then to find the Canons less wordy than the Historical Chapters?
A33908When do they commence, and what Signs have we to distinguish them by?
A33908When the Doctor supposes he has no Title either from Law, or Providence?
A33908Whence comes it to pass then they are so perfectly sui juris, without a Release?
A33908Whence then comes the sudden Alteration?
A33908Wherefore will Power( humane Power) Govern?
A33908Whether a man can swear away another''s Right without asking his Leave?
A33908Whether he delights to see Men Brethren in Iniquity, and combine for the support of Violence?
A33908Who ever heard, that unlawful Absolving, or a Dispensation against Authority and Right, signified any thing?
A33908Who seems to wonder the Pharisees could not distinguish upon the Prohibition; but took it in too unlimited a sence?
A33908Who would change the Title of Private Property, and throw himself out of the protection of the Law, for such a glittering Uncertainty?
A33908Who would live alone, if Company can do all these Wonders?
A33908Who, that could live any other way, would wear a Crown at this rate?
A33908Whose Fault was that?
A33908Why God allows Usurpers to represent him in the State, and denies this Privilege to those of the same Character in the Church?
A33908Why could not he stand a Siege as well as the Iews had formerly done against Nebuchadnezzar?
A33908Why did he fall short of the Resolution of Tyre, and Gaza, and be out done by mere Heathens in point of Loyalty?
A33908Why may they not attack their lawful Sovereign in the Feild; draw their Sword against acknowledged Justice; and fire upon God Almighty?
A33908Why not, if there is no Malice in the Opposition?
A33908Why should Publick Authority, upon which the common Security depends, have a less firm Establishment than that of single Families?
A33908Why should any Power persecute People to the death, meerly because they are willing to go Heaven, and are afraid of being damned?
A33908Why should he give his Authority to Temporal Usurpers, and deny it to Spiritual?
A33908Why so?
A33908Why so?
A33908Will it govern Right or Wrong?
A33908Will the Doctor say, these Powers are ordained by God?
A33908Would the Dr. have all this Care taken for the sake of Revolters?
A33908Yes, the Dr. grants he may, notwithstanding his dispossession, have a Legal Right to Allegiance, and the Crown; and from whom is this Right due?
A33908why so?
A33908will Power govern whether God will or no?
A50351( this compellation is very emphatical) to dwell in your cieled Houses, and this House lie waste?
A5035114. v. command this as the Will of God?
A5035116. upbraiding the multitude of the People, reckon in the last place, as the highest of his Favours Temporal, That they prospered into a Kingdom?
A5035132. and this is the second glorious Reformation of Calvesworship: what was the issue, I pray you?
A50351Afterwards when it was corrupted, who made the Reformation?
A50351Again, in his Death, Did not our Saviour Christ acknowledge Pilate''s Power( that is the Roman, of which he was Deputy) to be from above?
A50351Again, may there not be some points of Discipline, and Doctrine too, reserved as proper and peculiar for a Provincial?
A50351And I pray you, may she afterward shake him off at Pleasure?
A50351And did not our Saviour practise it, and his Apostles after him, and after them all the Christian Church?
A50351And doth there not lie to the King extrema appellatio, the last Appeal?
A50351And here, is not the Trust less and more, as it pleaseth the King to give it?
A50351And if his Father be subject to another, is he not by the same Law subject to his Father''s Superiour?
A50351And is not their Reformation attended with Fury and Violence, Impiety against God, sacred Persons, sacred Places, sacred Things?
A50351And to what purpose is this?
A50351And what can be said against modus acquirendi, the way by which such a one elected obtaineth this right?
A50351And who dare to deny the Honour is from the King, the Fountain of all Honour?
A50351And will they be so unjust to force this upon us in a Monarchy, with a contrary Sense destructive of Sovereignty and Supremacy in a King?
A50351Are not Communities subject to dangerous Inclinations from private Incitements?
A50351Are not Pharaoh, Abimelech, Hiram, Hazael, Hadad, no less honoured with the compellation of Kings, than David, Saul, or Ezekiah?
A50351Are not all and every one of Subjects by Duty and Oath tyed to Salus Regis, to provide for his Safety, Honour, Wealth, and Power?
A50351Are not their Representatives subject to mis- leading Factions, and ambitions of private ends?
A50351Are they not all under his Protection?
A50351Are they not subordinate, subject to their pre- existent Father, and to his Superiour too, if he have any?
A50351Are we not tied to advance his Honour?
A50351As first, to whom can it be more proper to give the Rule over men, than to him who is the onely King truly and properly of the whole World?
A50351Be wise, O ye Kings, serve the Lord with Fear, kiss the Son left he be angry, and ye perish from the way; When his Wrath is kindled but a little?
A50351But I pray you who are the competent Judges to determine, that our case is such?
A50351But Officiis quis idoneus istis?
A50351But how, I pray you, goeth this work on?
A50351But leaving this, Did he not in his Ministry teach and practise it?
A50351But that it hath all its Entity and Being by influence from humane Appointment?
A50351But then I demand, how can this Contract be made void?
A50351But what is this I pray you?
A50351But what may be the proper, natural, and innocent sense of the words, Salus populi suprema lex esto?
A50351But what was the effect of this work, wrought by this Paramount Law?
A50351But what?
A50351By Dreams; By Voice; by a crying Voice; by Writ; from whom?
A50351By Moses''s rod what wonders were wrought in Egypt, and what a Miracle was it that the rod of Aaron budded, and none else of the twelve Tribes?
A50351Can he make it away without betraying Gods Right, and the Trust he hath put upon him, he being God''s Vicegerent onely and Feoffee in trust?
A50351Can you from hence conclude, that the Punishment of Theft is not an inviolable Order and Ordinance of Almighty God and common Equity?
A50351Did he not rebuke Peter, who with his Sword would have in a Defensive way saved him from those bloudy Persecutors?
A50351Did he not secure it, that it should be transmitted to the first born, that Government amongst mortal men should be immortal?
A50351Did he not tell him, He that killeth by the Sword, shall perish by the Sword?
A50351Did not the Campani in this way, if we may trust Livie, subject themselves totally to the people of Rome?
A50351Do not our Sectaries impudently maintain, that Kings are the onely Extract of the People, having their Being and Constitution by derivation from them?
A50351Do they not all of them give and grant that Saint Peter did not transmit the Power of doing Miracles to all his Successors?
A50351Do they not hold that in fieri, Kings are dependent from People, but not in facto?
A50351Do they not hold, that howsoever Episcopacy is a tolerable government of the Church, yet it is mutable, at the pleasure of the Church?
A50351Do they not maintain that they are immediately from God but in Regard of Approbation?
A50351Do we not see all the Creatures established in a Subordination one to another?
A50351Do we not see that before the Woman came into the World, or a Child was born, God fixed Government in the person of Adam?
A50351Doth he allow us to do wrong and seek an Opportunity to do Good?
A50351Doth not Scripture express the immense Sovereignty of God and Christ over the World and Church, by the Compellation of King?
A50351First, as the natural Father( suppose that Adam were living, had he not just Title to the Monarchy of the World?)
A50351For now they shall say, we have no King, because we feared not the Lord; what then should a King do unto us?
A50351For what were the Kings of Babylon, but to speak in our Adversaries diction, Tyranni cum titulo?
A50351Fourthly, what is the reason that all Christian Emperours and Kings glory in the Sign of the Cross, and place it upon the Top of their Sacred Crowns?
A50351From whence I pray you, is this, but from the sacred and inviolable God of Nature?
A50351From whence is this Power?
A50351Had either the Community, the collective or representative Body any other hand in it than to obey, as Moses King of Ioshurun commanded?
A50351Hath any now the Liberty of his Person?
A50351Hath not God in the moral Law taught it, Honora Patrem,& c. Honour thy Father,& c?
A50351Hath not Royalty been thus entertained?
A50351Have not these mis- called Reformations been acted, prosecuted with open and crying Injustice, not only against innocent but well deserving men?
A50351Have they not all sworn, or should swear, Allegiance and Supremacy?
A50351He that obeyeth not the King, fighteth against God,( what do they then that come in Arms against him?)
A50351How can a Society be imagined without Order?
A50351How can it be said so, seeing in them it was never found, never actuated, never exercised?
A50351How can the Subject be free of Sacrilegious guiltiness to take it from him, if lavishly or inconsiderately he will make it away?
A50351How dare they be so impertinent, so impudent to say, that in the People there is an underived Majesty?
A50351How fare the People?
A50351How in any other notion, relation, or consideration, but as the other Party Contractor in this imaginary, notional, and fancied Contract?
A50351How is Religion entreated?
A50351How is it imaginable that they can be said to judge in God''s place, and not receive the Power from God?
A50351How much might be said, if we pleased to insist to prove our point?
A50351How then can he be freed from Subjection to his Father?
A50351How then can they be imagined in any other capacity than of a Subject?
A50351How then?
A50351I gave him, I took him away; what can you require more?
A50351I pray you, is not the Father of many Sons no less Father universally to all than to every one?
A50351If Kings were the Derivatives of the People and Community, in whom is that fansied, underived Majesty?
A50351If all and every one hath this Power above- mentioned, where then are those that are to be ruled and governed?
A50351If the King then be not authorised and furnished with sufficient power to work this effect, how can the People expect it?
A50351If you will not acknowledge a subjection upon all universally, how can you tye the King to a protection of all universally?
A50351In the Passages adduced consider: First, who is the Author?
A50351Is he not thus by the Law of God and Nature to submit and subject himself in Reverence and Obedience to his Father?
A50351Is it lawful and warrantable to you to do Evil, or give way to Evil, and to wait opportunity to do good afterward to salve all this?
A50351Is it not different in some onely for such and such Cases and Causes, in others, for some others different?
A50351Is it not fit then that they hold their Crowns of Christ?
A50351Is it not fit, that Kings be taught so much, that with the more Alacrity and Zeal, they may advance the good of Christs Kingdom?
A50351Is it not very considerable that God did not make Evah of the Earth as he did Adam, but made her of the man; and declareth too, made her for man?
A50351Is not every one that cometh into the World begotten of a Father?
A50351Is not the Female Sex by the Ordinance of God and Nature inferiour and subordinate to the male?
A50351Is not the King bound no less to protect all his Subjects universally, than to protect every one severally, singly?
A50351Is not the King by this made glorious at home, and terrible abroad?
A50351Is not the case possible and probable, that Bishops of one particular Church may be more restrained than Bishops of another particular Church?
A50351Is there not a great Variety and Difference in the measure and manner of the Punishment, in different Kingdoms and Nations?
A50351Is there one of a thousand, if you trust Iob or Solomon, amongst them of understanding?
A50351Is this to ennoble them?
A50351It is from Heaven, but how I pray you?
A50351Listen I pray you, to what followeth, and without a Prince, that is, there shall be no Nobility; and what more?
A50351May he not by the same Power ordain a Priest without a Title or Cure?
A50351May they not by the same Grounds disarm whom they will, to weaken Gods Enemies?
A50351Must not the like hold betwixt a Father and his Family?
A50351Next, is it not prophesied by Isaiah, that Kings shall be the Nurse- fathers of his Church, Reges erunt nutritii tui?
A50351Of Supreme, then of Subordinate Command?
A50351Of supreme than subordinate?
A50351Of usurped and not just, than of just Government and Regal?
A50351Officiis quis idoneus istis?
A50351Or can you expect that God will honour you to make you fit instruments to repair again what is wrong?
A50351Or whether or not in any case or exigent, a King can be subordinate?
A50351Pilate demands the Question, Art thou a King?
A50351Quid verba audiam cum facta non videam?
A50351Quomodo enim( saith he) Reges Domino serviunt, nisi ea quae contra jussa Domini fiunt religiosâ severitate prohibendo atque plectendo?
A50351See we not in the lifeless and senseless Creatures that the inferiour giveth a Tacite Reverence, and silent Obedience to the Superiour?
A50351Since Christ''s Patrimony hath been despoiled, who can say, This I have?
A50351Some will have it in the Collective Body, but how?
A50351Take another Instance; the face of man is not much above a Span in Length or Breath, yet what an immense Variety is there in the faces of men?
A50351That Matthias was one, Who will controvert?
A50351That he beareth not the Sword in vain?
A50351That the Sovereign hath this Power, who is so mad as to deny it?
A50351The fifth and last is, Whether or not in any case it is lawful for Subjects, one, any, more, or all to oppose a Prince?
A50351The proper Work of Wisdom is ordinare, to order, and to establish Order; Why then shall not all Monarchy refer its Origine to this Wisdom?
A50351The second is, Whether or not, God is no more Author of Royal Power, than of Aristocratical or Democratical?
A50351This is most false: Hath not the King his own Right from Almighty God?
A50351This made David say, Who can touch the Lords Anointed and be innocent?
A50351To both the one and the other God may justly say, Quis haec requisivit à vobis?
A50351To do it or do worse?
A50351To make Covenants against King or Sovereign, pretending or intending, if you will so, the Reformation of Religion, where read you it?
A50351Tolle jura Imperatorum& quis audet dicere, mea est illa villa, aut meus est ille servus, aut domus baec mea est?
A50351Turn the Tables, and then see what you will judge of the throw, Do not all we Subjects owe Duty to the King?
A50351Two were set apart, the Decision was by Lots, and yet, I pray you, was not Matthias an Apostle by immediate Constitution from Christ?
A50351Was ever any act done by them but in a tumultuary way?
A50351Was there ever a greater Treason hatched and set on foot against any than him?
A50351Well, but it is no great matter for Religion, if every man can enjoy his Liberty, his Honour, his Peace, live in Safety, what is Religion to us?
A50351What Blood of Nobles and generous Gentry hath been shed?
A50351What Desolations were there in Church and State in Saul''s Reign?
A50351What Law?
A50351What Property is reserved?
A50351What Prophet almost hath not a hint, an Expression of this?
A50351What can be more emphatically spoken?
A50351What can be more fully said?
A50351What can be said o ● that abominable act of the Iews, who to save themselves condemned Christ?
A50351What can our Adversaries say of a Title acquired to a Kingdom by lawful Conquest?
A50351What else was it that repressed the Fury of the People enraged against Gideon for destroying their Idol, but this Majesty?
A50351What followeth upon all this?
A50351What is the Solemnity?
A50351What is the Success?
A50351What need we to be afraid to speak with Scripture?
A50351What rich and princely Furniture hath been destroyed?
A50351What spece of Government had been then, I pray you tell me it?
A50351What stately Houses have been spoiled?
A50351What was 〈 ◊ 〉 I pray you, but this Authority and Majesty resplendent in him, which was a curb to the Tyranny of his Malice and Power?
A50351When the Lord''s Prophets were hurt and wronged, was the Lord''s Anointed not touched?
A50351Where can you shew any Truth of this kind, in Scripture so revealed, so manifested, by such miraculous, extraordinary, and admirable ways?
A50351Where then is the Truth of this deceiving Maxim which worketh so much mischief, Quisque nascitur liber, every man is born a free- man in the Forrest?
A50351Whether or not God is no more Author of Regal, than of Aristocratical and Democratical Power?
A50351While they are instituted, but not after that they are invested with that Power derived from the Community?
A50351Who can deny then, but it beseemeth a Divine most of all men to maintain or write of this subject?
A50351Who can make this Subordination void, except he will ranverse the Ordinance of God and Nature?
A50351Who hath made you Judges and Executers of matters of so high concernment?
A50351Who hath required these things of your hands?
A50351Who is so stupid to aver, that the Honour of a Lord, Baron, or Earl is from the Servant, a fellow- subject immediately?
A50351Who is this Judge?
A50351Who may expect a Blessing to a sinful and rebellious Course?
A50351Why doth St. Peter urge obedience to the King, because that is the Will of God?
A50351Why then, I pray you, shall not, should not the surrogated Father by Election enjoy the Priviledges and Rights of the Father natural?
A50351Why, if it be otherwise, was it promised to Ahraham, as the highest pitch and reach of Temporal Blessings, that Kings should come of him?
A50351Will not any understanding Prince, chuse rather to submit and subject his Crown to the Popes Mitre, than to the Fury and Violence of an untamed Beast?
A50351Will you not, Observator, allow the King the like measure?
A50351and for what purpose was it that God made both the one and the other miraculous?
A50351and how Order without Priority and Posteriority?
A50351and how cometh it to pass, that in such a particular way and enumeration all are given to God?
A50351and that their Judgment is only to be executed by the Parish Pope?
A50351and yet may he not be restrained by positive Consent and Constitution, that he shall not do it?
A50351are not the best of Subjects, the best of God''s Servants kept in Prisons, like to Jeremie''s Dungeon?
A50351from the most high God: from the holy one: from the Watcher: from the God of Heaven: to whom?
A50351how comes it to pass that the holy Spirit hath not in any place or syllable of Scripture intimated it?
A50351or is it intirely and immediately by a Trust devolved upon him from the King of Kings?
A50351what Exclamations?
A50351what Expressions?
A50351what Reason is it?
A50351what Right?
A50351what have the poor sheep done?
A50351who can deny it?
A50351who doubteth of this?
A50351〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉, Rulers?
A2886427. i If we have sowen unto you spirituall things, is it a great thing, if we shall reap ▪ your carnall things?
A2886431. u I. G ▪ p 3. x Thou which teachest another, teachest thou not thy self?
A288645ly, This Citie or Towne is the Kings; otherwise how could he put a Commander into it, and give him an Oath to keep it for him?
A28864A Clergie- man, and a Preacher of the Word of God, and altogether for ruine and destruction?
A28864A wonder it is, you had not framed your argument thus: who knows not, that the Parliament caused the Arch Bishop of Canterbury to be beheaded?
A28864Alas, alas, what creatures have you to deale with?
A28864All blind but Mr. Iohn Geree, and his confederacy?
A28864An orderly alteration, or Legall waies of change, who condemnes?
A28864And are not pelf, honour, and preferment the cause of all these fidings, and seditions, in Church, and State?
A28864And can it be denied, that i Melchisedec, Preist of the most high God, was King of Salem, and made so by God himself?
A28864And can ye look to fare better?
A28864And e who may say unto him, What doest thou?
A28864And for the Church, who so fit, who so able to speake as Bishops?
A28864And how must this be done?
A28864And how was that?
A28864And how was that?
A28864And how was this accepted of?
A28864And if he breake this solemne Oath, in his own person, with what conscience can he punish perjurie in others?
A28864And if we reap not your carnall things, how shall we sowe unto you spirituall things?
A28864And is it not reason, that he, who sets the Presbyters on work, should pay them their wages?
A28864And is it not so now?
A28864And is not the silencing of the ten Commandments, for the better oversight and censure of manners?
A28864And is not this, which is wrought against the Clergie, a tyrannous invasion?
A28864And m if the foundation be destroyed, what becomes of the Parliament?
A28864And shall Bishops smart for it, when Lay- men have done the mischief, and purse up the profits?
A28864And shall God or the King forbear to do right, because the multitude murmure at it?
A28864And shall I be ashamed to do the like?
A28864And shall not all these oblige him so much the more to be tender of this Oath?
A28864And then why may they not hang the rest of the Bishops, if their lives prove inconvenient, and prejudiciall to the Church?
A28864And this very Parliament, how oft have they called themselves, The kings great Councell?
A28864And to what purpose was this charge to Timothy, unlesse he were to provide for the Presbyters of his Church?
A28864And was not the crie the same then, that is now?
A28864And was not this priviledge granted, for the grace and favour that f Shesbazzar and g Ezra found in the eyes of those Kings?
A28864And what I pray you, is become of the Lords Supper, x which we are commanded to administer and receive, in remembrance of our B. Saviour?
A28864And what Scholer of worth will desire Orders, when he knows, that by these he shall be exposed to contempt and beggary?
A28864And what are these?
A28864And what is that?
A28864And what''s that?
A28864And who are these men, that have this authority?
A28864And who are these?
A28864And why not now; as well as heretofore?
A28864And why not we?
A28864And why so?
A28864And why so?
A28864And why so?
A28864And why so?
A28864And would you have him to be forsworne, and to neglect that, which by right he ought to make good?
A28864And yet how many lay Chancelours have you subjected us to?
A28864And yet who dares say that the High Priesthood in the old Law was an usurpation?
A28864And yet who dares say, that the Priestood was the cause of those uproars?
A28864And yet why may not I make use of him as well as your fellow Ministers of London?
A28864Are Bishops unfit to advise, or assent in framing Laws?
A28864Are not here the timber and stones of his house, his strong men, and the sons of his loins utterly consumed?
A28864Are not here two Supremacies set up by you; that so you may make the Parliament Law- lesse, and subject to no power?
A28864Are not the later as much theirs, as the purchased lands?
A28864Are not these strong evidences of the Kings Supremacy?
A28864Are they Presbyters onely?
A28864Are they not alike settled by the same Law,& justified alike by the same Law?
A28864Are we dealt with as the Dispensers of Gods high and saving mysteries?
A28864Are we no subjects?
A28864Are we not all Adams sons?
A28864Are we not brethren in Christ?
A28864Are we of the same body; and yet have no priviledges with the body?
A28864Are we so?
A28864Are you of this Realm, or are you not?
A28864Because they are the usuall Preachers, and dispensers of the Sacraments?
A28864Besides, doth not St. Paul justifie, that f none may preach, except they be sent?
A28864Boughen, Edward, 1587?-1660?
A28864Boughen, Edward, 1587?-1660?
A28864But can that be a just power, which deals unjustly?
A28864But e the Parliament is the supreme Court, by which all other Courts are to be regulated: what say we to that?
A28864But from whence comes this defect, or want of maintenance?
A28864But how can that be usurpata, which is data; both usurped, and given?
A28864But how comes it to passe, that if root and branch must up, yet by your Ordinance some branches of that root may be preserved?
A28864But how comes it to passe, that out of this Any of the Kingdome, you conclude against All the Rights of the Clergie?
A28864But how if they deceive the Kings trust, and abuse his confidence?
A28864But how long are these Laws in force?
A28864But how shall he protect us, that is not able to secure himself?
A28864But how shall it be proved, that Episcopacy is so bad, that it is a sin to defend it?
A28864But how shall they learn to govern, that know not how to obey?
A28864But how will you proove, that his Majestie hath sworne to uphold that, which is unjust or impious?
A28864But if these be good; that have indangered their lives to uphold Bishops, what are they, I beseech you, that have spent their blaod to root them out?
A28864But if they do, what then?
A28864But suppose, there were such a Law, as you- speak of, could it be just?
A28864But suppose, they shall make any such grant through ignorance, wilfulnesse, or evill counsell, shall it be of force?
A28864But they have no power to alter: that is in the King; or else, why do they Petition him so to this day, to make such changes good, as they contrive?
A28864But what Office was this, that Timothy and Titus did beare in the Church?
A28864But what are these Rights that you are so eagar to have abrogated?
A28864But what are these priviledges, and duties, whereof they are said to be despoiled?
A28864But what became of him?
A28864But what becomes of this consultation?
A28864But what follows upon this?
A28864But what if the Laws of the Land, what if Magna Charta do oblige all men to stand up for the due observation of these privileges?
A28864But what inconvenience will follow, if we confesse, that the intention of the Oath was changed, with the change of our condition?
A28864But what inconvenience, I pray you, ariseth to the people from the rights and priviledges of the Clergy?
A28864But what is this to prove, that by Christs warrant in Scripture a Presbyter is indued with power to rule in his eongregation?
A28864But what is this to the point in question?
A28864But what is this, that he calls power of Order?
A28864But what makes that So there?
A28864But what''s become of the regular way?
A28864But when was that time?
A28864But wherein is our condition changed?
A28864But wherein is the Kings Oath to the Clergie, inconsistent with his Oath to the people?
A28864But wherein n will the latter Oath be a present breach of the former and so unlawfull?
A28864But who are these Praepositi, these Rulers, here mentioned?
A28864But who did so?
A28864But who were these lands settled upon?
A28864But why am I so carefull to heap up instances?
A28864But why are you so suddenly fallen from an abolition, to an alteration?
A28864But why cheifly?
A28864But why do we o abhor Idols, and commit sacriledge?
A28864But why was this privilege abolisht, as incongruous to their calling?
A28864But why( I pray you) is the question proposed here, when you have determined it before?
A28864But will any wise man take your word for a Law, or imagine it to be more authentick, then the resolutions of all our fore- fathers?
A28864But you must be giving Orders, as well as the Bishop?
A28864But you must be k offering incense, as well as the High Priest?
A28864But, I beseech you, what is the meaning of these words, this will turn pomp into use?
A28864But, I pray you, what Society in Rule, can you chalenge with the Bishops, when by Scripture ye are made subject to them?
A28864But, in sober sadnesse, do you beleeve that the Abrogation of Episcopacy is that, they yawn at?
A28864By a just power, we see, this can not be done; how then shall it be done in a regular way?
A28864By taking Orders?
A28864Can they endure, that their power should be onely derivative, and that from the people?
A28864Damne up the fountain, or divert his course, and what becomes of the river?
A28864Desire you to know, who is the true owner?
A28864Destroy the Father, and how shall the Children be provided for?
A28864Do not you go about to make the Word of God a lye, while you endeavour to dis- inherit the Clergie of these privileges and honors?
A28864Do the people use to make Laws in a Monarchie?
A28864Does not your own Mr. Edwards professe, that never was there such plenty of Sects and Heresies?
A28864Doth it truly and justly agree with the Word of God; at least, not contradict it?
A28864Fed with an Ordinance, with words; but where''s the fift part?
A28864For are not these your words, that the change of the Clergies condition must needs change the intention of the Oath?
A28864For do not the Houses at this day Petition His Majestie, to make that a Law which they have voted?
A28864For do not you say plainly, that t there''s a Supremacie in the King, and a Supremacy in the Parliament?
A28864For do not you say thus?
A28864For do not you say ▪ that your second Ant ● gonist plainly ● ffi ● ms, that the King can not desert Episcopacy without flat perjury?
A28864For do not you tell us, that b ther''s a Supremacie in the King, and a Supremacie in the Parliament?
A28864For doth not S. Paul command Timothy, to y withdraw himself from those, that teach unwholsome Doctrine?
A28864For doth not our Saviour say, b He that receiveth whomsoever I send, receiveth me?
A28864For doth not your Title page speak thus?
A28864For how many of you have been instituted into Benefices by lay Chancelours?
A28864For o who may say unto him, what doest thou?
A28864For what have the Clergie besides their Orders, priviledges, and immunities; besides their Jurisdiction and revenues?
A28864From abrogation to alteration?
A28864Hath he forfeited it?
A28864Hath he resigned it?
A28864Hath not Mr. Geree set you in the sleep way to ruine?
A28864Hath not all been done by tumults, and insurrections?
A28864Have not they done wrong?
A28864Have we forgot that?
A28864Have we some privileges, that the Laity have not?
A28864Have you a desire to know, what true justice is?
A28864Have you not alreadie dis- roabed them of their honors?
A28864Have you not made them house- lesse, harbourlesse, not able to keep a servant?
A28864Have you not plundred their houses, and seized their Lands?
A28864Here was wrong done; But to whom, think you?
A28864How came you to spie this foule mistake?
A28864How can he then disclaime this Oath?
A28864How comes this to passe?
A28864How if they break the Lawfull Circle, and transgresse the Customs of Parliament?
A28864How like you this, my rich Masters of London?
A28864How like you this?
A28864How many have been inforced to flye with all secrecy from Westminster, because they would not passe their Vo ● es against Law and conscience?
A28864How oft have the Kings of this Realm ingaged themselves to observe Magna Charta, and to maintain the rights and liberties of the Church?
A28864How prove you that?
A28864How then can I give away Gods inheritance to the Edomites& Ishmalites, lest perchance they enter forcibly upon it?
A28864How then can he desert them, or leave them out of his protection?
A28864How then can he infringe this Oath?
A28864How then did we forfeit g our birth- right?
A28864How then must he attain the Priesthood?
A28864How then shall he treat in Parliament with those, that have no being?
A28864How then?
A28864How?
A28864How?
A28864How?
A28864How?
A28864I beseech you, do you dream?
A28864I. G. p. 9. n I. G. p. 9. o If the King should be peremptory in deniall, what help would this be to them?
A28864If He be the onely Supreme, how shall we find another Supreme, or an equall to him within his own Dominions?
A28864If all ● ffi ● es must be discarded, because the officers have done a misse, what office will remain in this Kingdom?
A28864If he hath power, where is it?
A28864If his Majestie have endeavoured to do that, which is right, what are they, that have hindered him from doing it?
A28864If it be a sin, and an heinous sin, c how then can I commit this great wickednesse, and sin against God?
A28864If it be, why are you so zealous, to distinguish us and our privileges, from the people and their priviledges?
A28864If one be abolished, why may not the other be removed?
A28864If then all these and many more are peculiar to Soveraignty, what is left for the Parliament?
A28864If then it be Treason to slay the Prelate, what sin is it to murder Prelacy?
A28864If there be no Prelates, where''s the treatie?
A28864If this Governour now surrender this Towne upon composition, doth he violate his Oath?
A28864In at subjection, out at immunities?
A28864In at taxes, out at privileges?
A28864Inconsistent with the Kings Oath to the people?
A28864Indeed a if it were all one member, where were the body?
A28864Indeed i he makes a wonder, that any man should doubt of it; For how can the Office be maintained without means?
A28864Indeed you say that, which is equivalent; for are not these your words; g He can not now deny consent( to their abolition) without sin?
A28864Is Episcopacy bad, because Gregory VII ▪ of Rome, George of Cappadocia, or Paulus Samosatenus abused their place and function?
A28864Is it equall then, I beseech you, to ingage the lives of some, to destroy the honour and estate of others?
A28864Is it no sin?
A28864Is it not enough by this extirpation to barre your selves from heaven, unlesse ye sink your posteritie into the same damnation?
A28864Is it not enough to murder Priests, unlesse ye slay the Priestood also?
A28864Is it not fit, that we should all have share, and share like, as had the children of Israel in the land of promise?
A28864Is it to sit in the House of Peers?
A28864Is not the case put right?
A28864Is not this a flat contradiction?
A28864Is not this as Philo Judaeus hath it, to x make God a shelter for our wickednesse, and to cast our sin upon him?
A28864Is not this flatly against the Oath of Supremacy?
A28864Is not this that sacra fames, that sacred hunger, which is so greedy of all that is called sacred?
A28864Is not this the blessing they have gained by that hideous and senselesse out- cry?
A28864Is not this the crying sinne, the grand Monopolie of these times?
A28864Is not this the way to lead in Jeroboams Priests; to fill the Pulpits with the scum of the people, and to bring the Priesthood into utter contempt?
A28864Is not this to c blaspheme the footsteps of the Lords anointed?
A28864Is not this to cast aside not onely a fore- head, but all conscience, and the fear of God?
A28864Is not this to question the actions of those Saints d to whom the Faith was first delivered?
A28864Is perjurie a sin, or no sin?
A28864Is the Apostleship naught, because Judas abused himself and that?
A28864Is the Kings O ● ● h, or Episcopacy, or the abr ● ga ● i ● n of Episcopacy but a circumstance?
A28864Is the Ministery Lawfull, or no?
A28864Is there no danger of sacriledge in robbing father and mother?
A28864Is this Justice?
A28864Is this any thing to the Church?
A28864Is this equalitie?
A28864Is this gratitude?
A28864Is this possible?
A28864Is this the fashion, first to resolve, and then to argue the case?
A28864Is this the way to invite men of worth, to incorporate themselves into your Presbyteriall Hierarchie?
A28864Is this to be good?
A28864Is this to be just?
A28864King and subject, Preist, and people, composers, approvers, takers, all dimme- sighted?
A28864Mark that: are we not all, both spirituall and temporall, bound to maintain each others privileges, as much as in us lies?
A28864Nay who shall beget children of the Church, when she is void of an Husband?
A28864Nay, are we so well dealt with as the lowest members of this Nation?
A28864Next, when the Church is stripped of her means, what kinde of Clergie shall we have?
A28864No danger in the subversion of the Church?
A28864No danger?
A28864One body Politick?
A28864Or, if you will, for their personall worth?
A28864Others are content to Covenant, Vote, or do any thing to save their own stakes; For to what purpose were it for them to withstand?
A28864Otherwise what strange confusion must necessarily have overspread the face of the Church, if this distinction had not been religiously preserved?
A28864Quo quid ab surdius dici potest?
A28864Shall she not in their absence be layed open to the subtill foxes, and mercilesse bores to wast and distroy her?
A28864Sir, will you keep Peace and godly agreement entirely( according to your power) both to God and the Holy Church, the Clergie and the people?
A28864Sir, will you( to your power) cause Law, Justice, and Discretion in mercie, and truth to be executed in all your Judgments?
A28864Suppose, the Bishops were faulty, shall God be turned out of his possessions, because his servants are to blame?
A28864Take these away, and what becomes of the Sacraments?
A28864That abrogation is the repealing, the disanulling of a Law; and not the changing of it?
A28864The Bishop is the ministeriall Spouse of the Church: how then can the Church be protected, if her husband be taken from her, or stripped of his means?
A28864The Bishop your father, and the Church your mother?
A28864The Bishops wealth, honor, and miters were your aim; these you have preached for, these you have fought for; what would you more?
A28864The Law of God we confesse to be the Supreme Law?
A28864The first is this, e If any can not rule his own house, how shall he take care for the Church?
A28864The peoples Laws?
A28864The question is, d Whether the King, notwithstanding his oath, may consent with a safe conscience, to the abrogation of Episcopacy?
A28864Their Laws?
A28864Thou, that preachest, a man should not steal, doest thou steal?
A28864Thus far Mr. Gerees question: what think you of it?
A28864To his subjects?
A28864To what purpose then are those words; d The abrogation will be just, as well as legall, there will be no injury done?
A28864To whom?
A28864To whose hands then should I chiefly present it, but to Yours?
A28864To whose trust were these committed?
A28864Was it forgotten?
A28864Was it settled by Christ, or no?
A28864Was not that provided for this State?
A28864Was not this as fair a pretence as yours, or as any you can invent?
A28864Was not this to turn impediments into helps?
A28864Was the first sworn in truth, and judgement, and righteousnesse?
A28864We have the same right; and why not the same protection?
A28864Well, what kinde of Government was there in the primitive Church?
A28864Well, what then?
A28864Were they not removed, to make way for these civill broils?
A28864Were they not thrust out, lest the King should have too many faithfull Counsellors in the House?
A28864What Law is there to countenance, what of late yeares hath been done against us?
A28864What did it?
A28864What difference, I pray you, between lands, purchased by the society of Goldsmiths, and such as are freely given to that Company?
A28864What have ye fought for?
A28864What if I should tell you, that you have altered the state of the question?
A28864What if a man should say, that this assertion is not true?
A28864What if any shall make an unjust Law, a Law without equity?
A28864What is become of it?
A28864What is to be done in this case?
A28864What may we then think of an oath taken with such high Solemnity?
A28864What mean you by circumstance?
A28864What multitudes are there in this Kingdom, that mourn and grieve to see Religion so opprest, so trampled on, and almost breathing out her last?
A28864What reason can you give, why that should suffer, that can not erre; that never offended?
A28864What say you to that memorable convention at Auspurg, where met all, or most of the learned, that endeavoured the Reformation?
A28864What say you to that principle of reason, l Propter quod aliquid est tale, illud est magis tale?
A28864What shall now become of your Case of Conscience?
A28864What then becomes of that Church, where there is no Bishop?
A28864What then shall become of the people?
A28864What would you more?
A28864What, because Presbyters offer up the prayers and supplications of the Church?
A28864What, for this cause?
A28864What, two Supremacies, two superlatives, at the same time, in the same Kingdom?
A28864What?
A28864What?
A28864What?
A28864What?
A28864What?
A28864What?
A28864What?
A28864What?
A28864What?
A28864When did we ever desire, or perswade his Majestie, to do the least injurie to people, or Parliament?
A28864When was this Oath, I beseech you, framed?
A28864Whence is it then, that the Bishops are thrust out of the House of Peers; and that none of us may vote, or sit in the House of Commons?
A28864Where is the orderly alteration, you speak of?
A28864Where the Parliament?
A28864Where then are the two Supremacies, which we erect?
A28864Where then is the Parliaments Supremacy?
A28864Where then is the Writ?
A28864Where then is their Supreme power?
A28864Where under pretence of the Common good, they ingrosse all into their own clutches?
A28864Who dare then after this foundation?
A28864Who made them makers ▪ or Masters of the Laws?
A28864Who then dares say, they ought not, or shall not?
A28864Who then shall obey?
A28864Who told you, that His Majestie had condescended to this impious and Antichristian demand?
A28864Why doest thou call a Parliament at this time, and not at that?
A28864Why doest thou honour this man, and not that?
A28864Why doth Q. Elizabeth call them l a great State of this Kingdome, if they be no State at all?
A28864Why rob we God, as if he were an Idol, not sensible of these wrongs, nor able to revenge them?
A28864Why then are our Rights and Liberties so strook at, and exposed to contempt and sale?
A28864Why then are they called Peers; when they are not so much as Peers to the people, but their substitutes, if not servants?
A28864Why then do you perswade the King to break his oath?
A28864Why, what''s become of the Oath of Supremacy?
A28864Why?
A28864Will not our Church then come to a sweet passe?
A28864Will you hear the motives?
A28864With what face then can we fall back, and wilfully incurre perjury?
A28864With what face then can you say, that the Kings Oath to the Clergie can not be consistent with the priviledges of the Nation?
A28864Would you have all these, or onely some of these abolished?
A28864YOu Object, and we confesse, that a this oath to the Clergie, must not be intended in a sense, inconsistent with the Kings Oath to the people?
A28864You and your great contrivers, what have ye laboured for, all this while?
A28864again fallen from the question?
A28864and d slander the footsteps of those anointed of the Lord, that have so long slept in peace?
A28864c Why should this Shimei blaspheme my Lord the King?
A28864e Whose legall priviledges, or rights have we invaded, or sought after?
A28864leg ● 1. y Quid i ● ● â caecitate tenebrosius, ad obtinendam inanissimam gloriam, errorem hominis aucupari,& Deum testē in corde contemnere?
A28864or both?
A28864or left out on set purpose?
A28864or to Vate in the House of Peers?
A28864or was it not?
A28864r If we have sown unto you spirituall things, is it a great matter if we reap your carnall things?
A28864so satisfactory and yet not hold?
A28864some branches lopped off, and some spared; is this according to your solemne league and Covenant?
A28864talke we of Levelling?
A28864to so many lay Committees in the City; to so many in every Countie?
A28864valid in Law, though injurious?
A28864what have ye shed so much blood for?
A28864which of our wives have had that justly payed them?
A28864z Quid si a liquis condat jus iniquum?
A28864● 15. l An ● was not here ● ● urpation against Gods direction?
A60479''T Is true, our Nostrils lost their Breath; What then?''
A60479''T is madnesse to use Candles in the day: What need a Parl''ament?
A604791. Who then ought to have the Militia but the King?
A604792. challengeth his praerogative; And the Lord God called unto Adam, and said unto him, Where art thou?
A6047924. speaking of Liberties, and who had power to give them, Quis?
A60479An fortuna regit manibus dans munera caecis?
A60479An ● what?
A60479And Pearls?
A60479And can any wise man think that this kingdom thus divided can stand?
A60479And can this divided Monster( which is the cause of all our divisions) cloze up our divisions, and settle our Nation in peace and happinesse?
A60479And how shall I hold that which is not to be found?
A60479And shall we cast thy prayer behind our backs, and presume to come before thee without it?
A60479And was he adjudged an Enemy to Parliaments, and an Infringer of their freedoms?
A60479And what Tyrant ever was there who did not shed mans blood?
A60479And what greater pretence have they had for their actions, than to say, that the King was not the Supreme Governour over his Subjects?
A60479And what is the House of Commons, a God?
A60479And what lawes of any Nation in the world, did ever maintain the liberty and freedome of the people, more than the Kings Lawes of England?
A60479And what?
A60479And why might not he turn out them by force, who by force had already turned out the King, Lords, and all the Commons, besides themselves?
A60479And will these oaths be kept?
A60479Are your Commandments above his?
A60479Art born a bondman?
A60479Art opprest with sickness?
A60479Art thou become a surety?
A60479Art thou contemned?
A60479Art thou poor and over- burdened with children?
A60479Art thou rich and childness?
A60479Art thou shut up in an unworthy prison?
A60479Art thou subject to a Tyrant?
A60479At quo cymba?
A60479At quo musae Procax?
A60479Be''t by thy fire, If I in fire must fry?
A60479Be''t by thy fire, if I in fire must fry?
A60479But O that we were made Judges in the Land, how equally and impartially would we give justice to all men?
A60479But as once it was demanded of an Oraaor; speaking very much in the commendation of Hercules, Quis vituperavit?
A60479But get thee behind me, Dagon, what hast thou to do with peace?
A60479But if all his Lands escheat, by what Law do they detain and keep the Queens Dower from her?
A60479But if the Commons when they sit in the House have the Soveraign power, where was it before their Sessions?
A60479But may any private hand stick this wild boar?
A60479But suppose all men were born free by nature, and that the people originally by nature had power to chuse a King?
A60479But to whom must he give his account?
A60479But was not this Soveraignty personally fixed in Adam, and so dyed with him?
A60479But what was their reason to abolish Kingship?
A60479But what, doth God give power to Kings to take away mens lives and estates unjustly?
A60479But what, is this all?
A60479But when Adam fell, did not his Soveraignty fall with him?
A60479But wherefore do I say we?
A60479But wherefore should I make my self ridiculous, in attempting to prove that which no age hath denied?
A60479But whether now my Muse, where wilt thou croud?
A60479But whither now my Boat?
A60479But why art thou cast down, O my soul, or why art thou disquieted within me?
A60479But why do I cite David Had not all the Kings in the Scripture, nay, hav ● not all the Kings in the world the chief powe ● over their Militia?
A60479But why hath the King no Peer in his Kingdome?
A60479But why should I blur my paper with the Description of this deceitfull Parliament, the Theory whereof, is become practical almost in every City?
A60479But why should I seek stars to light the noon day?
A60479But why should I speak of Law, to those who God and all the World knows Act all things against law?
A60479But you must adde the sacred blood of Kings?
A60479But you will ask me then, How can Mr. Prynne be clear from the guilt of blasphemy?
A60479By what Law, did I say?
A60479By what authority?
A60479Can any man but Mr. Prynne forge such a consequence?
A60479Can fish live in the air?
A60479Can not God who permitteth these Rebels to reign, as easily cast them down?
A60479Can the Almighty be so passionate?
A60479Can you do these things and look upwards?
A60479Can you put asunder, that which Jehovah hath joyned together?
A60479Can you scale the heavens, and subdue the Almighty?
A60479Cause we sinn''d once, shall''s ne''re be good agen?
A60479Children are riches, then how canst thou be poor, amongst so many jewels?
A60479Could not David have cut off S ● uls head, when he cut off the lap of his Garment?
A60479Could not our Saviour have had more than twelve Legions of Angles, to have repelled the fury of his persecutors?
A60479Could the Almighty suffer this?
A60479Could the betrothed do this?
A60479Did ever the world produce such blind prodigious Monsters?
A60479Did the King demand five treacherous Members of the Parliament, whom the Law would have condemned guilty of high Treason?
A60479Did the people foist up again the Rump of the long Parliamene?
A60479Did the people sanctifie the Committee of Safety over them?
A60479Did the people set up Oliver Protector?
A60479Did the people turn out Dick his son?
A60479Did the people turn out the long Parliament?
A60479Did they ever hear of him?
A60479Did thy harvest miss, and thy land lye barren one year?
A60479Do this?
A60479Do thy people hate thee their Soveraign?
A60479Dost not thou know what we want better than our selves?
A60479Dost thou complain that promisses made unto thee, are late in performance?
A60479Dost thou doubt my fatherly indulgence?
A60479Dost thou dwell in a narrow little house?
A60479Dost thou fear thou shalt lose the victory?
A60479Dost thou imagine it an easy thing to rule?
A60479Dost thou mourn because thou didst narrowly escape shipwrack?
A60479Dost thou suffer an hard Father?
A60479Dost thou think it will carry thee to Heaven?
A60479Dost thou weep for the death of thy son?
A60479Doth poverty knock at thy door?
A60479Durst you encounter the Almighty, pitch battail, and sight against his Deity?
A60479Eloquar?
A60479Exilio pellor injusto R. Quid tu igitur justo pelli malles exilio?
A60479Feign that the people did intrust the King with his Royal Office, yet why should it escheat to these Hypocrites?
A60479Finge datos currus, quid ages?
A60479For Rulers are not a Terrour to good works, but to the evil; wilt thou then not be afraid of the power?
A60479For art thou only a stranger in England, and hast not known the things which are come to pass there in these dayes?
A60479For by what authority was this Individuam vagum, the Keepers, erected?
A60479For do we not until this day praise and honour their Martyrdom?
A60479For he is accountable to none but unto the Lord, who will require it as his due; For the Lord called unto Adam, and said unto him, where art thou?
A60479For hear what Bodine saith, O how many Tyrants should there be, If it should be lawfull for subjects to kill their Soveraigns though Tyrants?
A60479For if every one of the three estate, or but two of them hath power to make Laws, who should be the Subjects to obey them, or who could give the Law?
A60479For is there any Law which maketh it high Treason in the King, if he commit such or such an offence?
A60479For my part, I think he had betrer be hanged; for what beast is more Salvage and uncertain, than the headlesse blind multitude?
A60479For now they shall say, we have no King, because we feared not the Lord; What then should a King do unto us?
A60479For the liberty of the people: For what cause do they enslave the whole Nation?
A60479For what is above the King?
A60479For what villany so great as for Subjects to murther their gracious King?
A60479For when Pilate said, Behold your King, shall I Crucify your King?
A60479For who can say any thing is his own?
A60479For who can stretch forth his hand against the Lords anointed, and be guiltless?
A60479For who was it that murthered the King?
A60479For why?
A60479For why?
A60479For — Q ● is talia fan do Mrmidonum, Dolopumve, aut duri miles Vlyssis, Temperet a lacrymis?
A60479For, Quid Jove majus habetur?
A60479For, if you ask them, for what cause did they murder the King?
A60479God save the King Adonijah?
A60479Haec facere Jason potuit?
A60479Hast not thou commanded us not to use vain repetitions; But when we pray, to pray thus, Our Father,& c?
A60479Hast thou a malapert wife?
A60479Hast thou a rebellious Son?
A60479Hast thou an unruly proud scholar?
A60479Hast thou buried thy wife?
A60479Hast thou lost a Tyranny?
A60479Hast thou lost an occasion to revenge?
A60479Hast thou lost thy betrothed mistress?
A60479Hast thou lost thy mony?
A60479Hast thou lost thy time?
A60479Hast thou many enemies?
A60479Hath Infamy blasted thy name?
A60479Hath nature made thee deformed?
A60479Hath not he in his Vpper- house constituted a King, and commanded you to honor, and obey him?
A60479Hath the King banished thee?
A60479Hath thy dying Mother forsaken thee?
A60479Hath thy friend forsaken thee?
A60479Have not they by their unjust punishments received greater rewards of praise, than if they had unjustly rebelled?
A60479Have they the Majesty, because they have no honour or dignity but by the Kings gift?
A60479Have thy subjects betrayd thee?
A60479He wished that his people had but one neck, that he might chop them off at a blow, vox Carnifice quam Imperatore dignior?
A60479Heu quis primus, adhuc gemmus latuisse volentes, Pondera&( illecibras vitiorum) protulit auri?
A60479His Disciples did I say?
A60479How could they, did I say?
A60479How dare the men then of our age, blaspheme God, even in their pulpits?
A60479How do our houses burn with lust?
A60479How long shall your Sanctuary be made a Stable and Den for Thieves?
A60479How men are taken with their own shadows?
A60479How much more then may they be taxed with foolery, who call other mens Lands after their own names and think they shall enjoy them for ever?
A60479How shall we sing the Lords song in a strange Land?
A60479I would have you to know, saith he, That I can do any thing, a true Character of a Tyrant, for what will not hee do?
A60479If any of us offend the King, thou mayest correct us, but if thou shalt exceed, who shall correct thee?
A60479If he repent, why doth he not write a book of retractations?
A60479If it be Tyranny for one man to govern according to his will?
A60479If so?
A60479If such thy will, and I deserve the same, Thou chief of Gods, Why sleeps thy vengefull flame?
A60479If the Law be equal in power with the king, then why doth the king pardon those, whom the Law condemneth, alter the old Laws, and make new Laws?
A60479If the opinions of the Spencers were so wicked, and detestable, what then are the actions of the Rebells of our age?
A60479If the subjects are not his inferours, why should they obey?
A60479If this be thy pleasure, and my deserts, Why sleep thy thunderbolts?
A60479In that same time said the King to the Multitude, Are ye come out as against a thief, with swords and staves, for to take me?
A60479Is it fit to say to a King thou art wicked?
A60479Is it fit to say to a King, thou art wicked, and to Princes, ye are ungodly?
A60479Is it fit to say to a King, thou art wicked, and to Princes, ye are ungodly?
A60479Is it lawfull to call thee a Man?
A60479Is it not because the Lord hath anointed thee to be Captain over his Inheritance?
A60479Is it not only because the King doth?
A60479Is there any Antidote against Caesar?
A60479Is there any other spirit to teach us to pray, than the Spirit of the Lord, which taught us in his Gospel?
A60479Is thy fare thine?
A60479Is thy friend dead?
A60479It is their Counsel to advise, not their power to authorize, which the King requireth; For why?
A60479It was the Presbyterians who first Clouded?
A60479Jam caelum terramque Dei sine numine, venti Miscere,& tantas audetis tollere moles?
A60479Lingua velut gustu vario, sic gaudet habere In studiis mens nostra vices: mutabile quid non?
A60479May we not resist him?
A60479Must the King give an account only of himself?
A60479My Chariot had, can thy frail strength ascend The obvious poles,& with their force contend?
A60479Nay, suppose the Father should draw his sword at his Son, would that be a just ground for him presently to run in upon his Father and stab him?
A60479No Militia, no King; For how can he defend himself and Kingdome without it?
A60479No action lyeth against him; For who can command the King?
A60479Non tentare levi( vetitum scelus) aequora ligno, Quid vero vetitum nos culpae fertilis aetas Fugimus?
A60479Nonne oportet Deo magis obedire, quam hominibus?
A60479Not that dread Thunderer, who rules above, Can drive these wheels: and who more great than Jove?
A60479Notes for div A60479-e12550 Quid prodest tibi nomen usurpare alie ● um& vocari quod non es?
A60479Notes for div A60479-e1490* — Nam quis iniqui Tam patiens orbis, tam ferreus ut teneat se?
A60479Now if Reason, and the Judgement of our Ancestors, would satisfie our frenzy upstarts, what greater authority would they have?
A60479O God why hast thou cast us off for ever?
A60479O King, with what terms of honour shall I style thee?
A60479O fortuna potens, quam variabilis, Tantum juris atrox quae tibi vindicas, Evertisque bonos, erigis improbos?
A60479O monstrous, did you ever hear of any Law in the whole world, that ever the King could commit high Treason?
A60479O purblind City, how long will you enslave yourselves to ravenous woolves?
A60479O quam te m ● morem virgo?
A60479Or can fowls live in the Sea?
A60479Or did they hunt in the Rump again?
A60479Or did they hunt them out again?
A60479Or have they made all the Revolutions and Choppings, and Changings amongst us?
A60479Or where is Oliver the Tyrant?
A60479Or who from sacred Altars spoil refrains?
A60479Or who shall cure the evil of the People?
A60479Or, that thou shalt always reign secure there?
A60479Ought we not to obey God rather than man?
A60479QVis furor O populus, quae tanta licentia ferri?
A60479Que enim est respublica ubi Ecclesiastici primum non habeant locum in Comitiis,& publicis de salute Reipub: Deliberationibus?
A60479Quid nos dura refugimus Aetas?
A60479Quin etiam Caroli rubefecit tela nefanda Dirus post genit is sangnis?
A60479R. An te rex expulit?
A60479Regni sacra fames quid non morialia pectora cogis?
A60479Samuel took a vyal of Oil, and poured it on his head: But the Lord anointed him King, he is the Lords anointed, not Samuels: For why?
A60479Shall I speak?
A60479Shall the Commons have a Negative voyce, who are most of them Tradesmen, and not educated in the Law, but in Mechanick handy- crafts?
A60479Shall your Streets blush with the blood of Prophets, and with the blood of your Cit ● zens, and will not you change your colour?
A60479Si plaoet hoc, meruique, quid O tua fulmina cessant Summe Deum?
A60479Si pretium mortis, vel reges morte petuntur: Talis honor regum?
A60479Si quis de nobis, O Rex, Justitiae tramites transcendere voluerit, a te corripi potest, si tu vero excesseris, quis te corripiet?
A60479So it may be demanded of me, treating of the Kings Soveraignty, who hath brought arguments against it?
A60479Some Letters, nay some words are left out, and wrong ones put in their room: What then?
A60479Suppose thy request granted thee, and thou got up into my Chariot, what wouldst thou do?
A60479Surely, nothing is more certain; otherwise, what difference would there be between the King and Subject?
A60479Tantaene animis caelestibus irae?
A60479Tantane vos generis tenuit fiducia Vestri?
A60479The King and the Power to command are Individua, He is a Clout, no King, which can not command; And who should be under his command?
A60479The King fell, and why should not I?
A60479The Rural parts are turn''d into a den of savage men; And where''s a City from all vice so free, But may be term''d the worst of all the three?
A60479Their answer is, for the liberty of the people: For what cause do they make themselves Governours, and Lords and Masters over all that we have?
A60479Then how could the King sin, when there was no Law for him to transgress?
A60479Then saith Pilate unto him, Speakest thou not unto me?
A60479Therefore how can the King offend against the Laws of the people, or be obnoxious to them, when they never gave him any Laws to keep, or transgresse?
A60479Therefore who can say unto the"King, what dost thou?
A60479Therfore rouze up Citizens, and take courage; How long will you be the common Hackney, to be ridden by every one that will stride you?
A60479This is the Popes Doctrine, to take away the lives of Princes; and ● re not we his true Disciples, when we put his words in practice?
A60479Thou knewest thou shouldest get a mortal Son, and dost thou now repent it?
A60479Thus when we have received our gracious Soveraign, from his long unnatural banishment, what then can the Lord do more for us, that he hath not done?
A60479Vusti quoque Rector Olympi, Qui fera terribili jaculatur fulmina dextra, Non agit hos curros: Et quid Jove majus habetur?
A60479Was ever God and Christ robbed so much of their Power, Honour and Majesty as by these Vipers?
A60479Was it the people?
A60479Was there ever such a jugling deceit acted by any Jugglers or Quacksalvers in the world?
A60479We blush at scars receiv''d, sinne, brothers fall, Vile age what mischief do we shun at all?
A60479What Tyrant more bloudy than Nero?
A60479What Tyrant more savage and cruel than Nebuchadnezzar?
A60479What art thou robbed of all that thou hast?
A60479What doth it hang in the Clouds, and drop on them when they sit, and dissolve like the Snow with the VVinter, when the King dissolveth them?
A60479What doth not gold, more sacred to them than their oathes, compel mortals to atchieve?
A60479What doth not the thirst of ruling compell these mortals to do?
A60479What greater exemplification, confirmation or demonstration of the kings Soveraignty, can there be than this Sacred Oath of Supremacy?
A60479What hadst thou rather than be justly banished?
A60479What hand so wilfully audacious?
A60479What is Magna Charta but the Kings will, and gift?
A60479What is an Act of Parliament, but the will of the King, Nay what is Magna Charta, but a Roy le veilt?
A60479What is it then to have, or have no wife, But single thraldome, or a double strife?
A60479What is the reason, that it is a Law that the King can not make new or alter old Laws, but in Parliament with the consent of his Lords and Commons?
A60479What madnesse O people, O people what licentious fury possesseth your earthly Cottages?
A60479What man then, so impudently wicked?
A60479What sins then are we guilty of, who not only provoke our King to anger, but quench his anger with his own bloud?
A60479What sweetnesse is there in Crowns, which makes you so earnest to wear them?
A60479What then remains?
A60479What then?
A60479What then?
A60479What then?
A60479What though a man be born blinde, and so continue from his birth to his death?
A60479What though cross gales drive us from our intended Haven?
A60479What will it profit a man to enjoy the whole world to day, and lose his own soul to morrow?
A60479What youth his hands for fear of gods contains?
A60479What?
A60479What?
A60479Where is Alexander the great?
A60479Where is Julius Caesar the Usurper?
A60479Where is Mr. Prynns almighty Parliament now?
A60479Where the word of a King is, there is power, and who may say unto him what d ● st thou?
A60479Where the word of a King is, there is power, and who may say unto him, what dost thou?
A60479Who can contradict what they said?
A60479Who can sufficiently celebrate the fame of those worthy Martyrs, who unjustly suffered for Religion, under the Government of Queen Mary?
A60479Who first found Gold?
A60479Who made them Princes and Judges over us?
A60479Who shall now cure the Kings evil?
A60479Who then can think upon our late most graciour King Charls the Martyr, without Tears in his Eyes, and contrition in his heart?
A60479Who were the fi ● st that brought their private wealth For publick Treasure,& as''t were by stealth Made that the lure to sin?
A60479Who?
A60479Why did they not give the superiority to the Knaves?
A60479Why is he not then called King of single men?
A60479Why not?
A60479Why preach you up your selves the maintainers of the Law so much?
A60479Why should it not be far greater Tyranny for a multitude of men to govern, how they please, without being accountable, or restrained by Law?
A60479Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power?
A60479Would not it be a most hideous and detestable thing for a son to murder his own Father?
A60479Yee Guardian Angels of this once blest Land Have you still for our good the same command?
A60479Yet since with sorrow here we live opprest, What life is best?
A60479Yet with what earnest expressions did the Prophet Jeremiah exhort the people to obey him, threatning them with utter destruction for their Rebellion?
A60479a General without souldiers?
A60479a Warriour without arms?
A60479after what manner, or how is it possible for them to make their choice?
A60479an Sileam?
A60479an Tyrannus?
A60479an hostis?
A60479an populus?
A60479an tu ipse?
A60479and by what means can the King rule, and direct his people, if he hath not the supreme power over the Laws?
A60479and can your Mortal nothings in the Lower- house( next door to hell) vote him useless?
A60479and can your Statutes repeal his?
A60479and hast thou not prescribed us a set form of prayer to ask it with?
A60479and how could he levy war, without lawes to direct, and guide his Arms?
A60479and our Chambers with pride and wantonnesse, whilest the streets blush with the blood of Prophets?
A60479and shall not we?
A60479and shall not we?
A60479and shall we murder the King?
A60479and take away not only the Crown, but the life also of your dread Soveraign?
A60479and then how can the people punish him, who never offended their Laws?
A60479and to Princes, ye are ungodly?
A60479and what book so much abūsed as his?
A60479and what greater treason was ever hatched and plotted against any man than him?
A60479and what made Job so famous, as his miseries?
A60479and where is it when they are dissolved?
A60479and who now so Ridiculous, and Scorned?
A60479anne parum dii percivilia bella Flumina& arva pio procerum tinxisse cruore?
A60479are the pots greater than the Potter?
A60479are we wiser than the Lord of life, or is there any nearer way to Heaven, than that which he hath taught us?
A60479could the Godly do this?
A60479death shall remove the stock We can bring Kings themselves unto the block If such may be their fate?
A60479doth not he make them?
A60479doth the Soveraign power sleep or die, during their interregnum?
A60479facere& consentire, to do& consent, but to what?
A60479for Martyr''d Charls what man or State Will vengeance seek before it be too late?
A60479for what difference is there between the King, and Subject, but that the one gives the Laws, the other receiveth them?
A60479from God; hath not God therefore greater power than the King ● he hath; From whence do the people derive their power?
A60479from the King; Hath not the King therefore more power than the people?
A60479have the two Houses joyntly, or the House of Commons singly, the Soveraign power, because they have none but what the King giveth them?
A60479is he not gone out like the snuff of a Candle, even loathsom to his own Parasites?
A60479knowest thou not that I have power to Crucifie thee, and have power to release thee?
A60479liceat periturae viribus ignis?
A60479liceat periturae viribus ignis?
A60479loquimur enim tibi, sed si volueris, audis, si autem nolueris, quis te damnabit, nisi qui se pronunciavit esse justitiam?
A60479may any publick or private man stab, or otherwise destroy this Tyrant before he be tried according to the Common course of the Law?
A60479or a Tyrant?
A60479or an enemy?
A60479or can the people, who have no authority, but what they have from him, have authority to correct, and revise their King?
A60479or doth he who ought for to obey, give Laws to him whose right it is to command?
A60479or hold my Peace?
A60479or is there any law to enable the people to call their King to an account?
A60479or that I will not own thee for my Son?
A60479or the people?
A60479or thou thy self?
A60479or whether they ever heard of any such law in any Kingdom or Nation under the Sun?
A60479or, that the change of Government will bring no danger?
A60479ought they to appoint wha ● Officers and Commanders they thought fit?
A60479our times Do run more fircely to forbidden crimes: I''st nothing think you, thus to stayn the flood, And fields, through civil War, with noble blood?
A60479pietas quid caelica prodest?
A60479poterisve rotatis Obvius ire polis, ne te citus auferat axis?
A60479quibus Pepercitaris?
A60479quid intactum nefasti Linquimus?
A60479quo tendit rustica musa?
A60479saith he, who hath power?
A60479shall he give Caesar his due?
A60479shall he give his account to the Inferiour servants of his Lord?
A60479shall he suffer himself to be murthered by the King?
A60479shall we present the Lord with our own husks, and trample on the Manna which he hath prepared for us?
A60479should he fight without the Militia?
A60479that Glory of all Christians, that Glory of the whole World?
A60479the King we know and the Kings son we know, but who are they?
A60479the Law, and the Court of Earls and Barons; But how are they above him?
A60479the high Court of Justice?
A60479then I ask this Question, Whether the sons of Adam have any power either from God or Nature, violently to resist and oppose the King their Father?
A60479unde manus juven ● us Metu Deorum continuit?
A60479what a superstitious and Papistical age do we live in?
A60479what pen can there be so repugnant, and contradictory to all truth?
A60479what, because the Commons made it?
A60479when we account it superstition and Popery to say the Lords Prayer,& the Common Prayer, the ordinary means of our salvation?
A60479where is the reverend Doctor Hewyt, that Glory of your City?
A60479which first gave them their being?
A60479who can look upon his Prophetical, and Incomparable Book, without Admiration, and Weeping Rejoycings?
A60479who can remember his patient Suffrings without Amazement and mourning?
A60479who can say his life, his goods or estate is secure, so long as a Tyrant reigneth?
A60479why doth thine anger smoak against the Sheep of thy pasture?
A60479why not a ● well, a Speaker without a mouth?
A60479why not to the people?
A60479why were they not called Peopledoms?
A60479— Could his Religion do this?
A60479— Quid non mortalia pectora cogis Auri sacra fames?
A60479● eu quid sancta fides?
A60479● i pede calcantur justi florentque nefasti: ● egia, caelicolae, terrarum sceptra tenetis?
A60479● rdine cur nullo mortalia pectora vivunt?
A57975( for absolutenesse Royall will amount to shedding of innocent blood) for if any oppose the King, or say, Sir, What doe you?
A5797510. inspire Samuel 17. to call the people before the Lord at Mizpeh, to make Saul King?
A5797513.4?
A5797515. had commanded Fornication and eating of blood, might not the Assembly forbid these in the Synod?
A5797518. for Christ excepteth none, and how can men except?)
A579752 When sacred Hierarchy, the order instituted by Christ, is overthrown, what is the condition of Soveraignty?
A579752. shall the Prelate and the Anabaptist inferre, Ergo, he giveth it not by plowing, sowing, and the art of the husbahd- man?
A5797522.12, 13, 14. and what, will this prove Presbyteries to be inconsistent with Monarchies?
A579754.7, 8. is it therefore in famine, unlawfull to till the earth, and seeke bread by our industry and are we to doe nothing but to pray for daily bread?
A579754.?
A579755.31?
A579756 To whom can it be due to give the Kingly office, but to him only who is able to give the indument and abilitie for the office?
A5797569. saith Fern, can Power in the abstract have praise?
A579758. and why not of foureteen degrees, as well as the Great Turke, or the King of Spaine?
A57975A King hath power of life and death,( saith the Prelate) What then?
A57975A King is a creature of Gods making onely; and what then?
A57975A man may render himselfe totally under the power of a Master, without any conditions: and why may not the body of a people doe the like?
A57975All these are inseparably in the Crown, but he stealeth in Prerogative Royall in the clause which is now in question?
A57975And do I not resist his person in the one, as in the other?
A57975And for the Churches weaknesse, that is, the weaknesse of the damned Prelates, shall this be the Kings weaknesse?
A57975And how a King and a Tyrant differ?
A57975And how is it that David anoynted by God is yet no King, but a private subject, while all Israel make him King at Hebron?
A57975And if birth was equivalent to divine unction, what needed Ioash who had royall birth, be made King by the people?
A57975And if they may defend themselves by defensive wars, how can wars be without offending?
A57975And is not this the sinne of the Land, that they suffer their King to worship Idols?
A57975And is that charitable of Kings ▪ that they will not be so mad as to destroy their owne Kingdome?
A57975And they that resist the Kings power, resist the King?
A57975And was it a heresie that M. Melvin taught, that Presbyter and Bishop are one function in Scripture?
A57975And what if the subject disobey the Great Turk?
A57975And what instruction was it to King or people to write to them a book of the wicked waies of a King, which nature teacheth without a Doctor?
A57975And what then?
A57975And, if they reteine some of it, habitu, in habit, and in their power?
A57975Are they only possible and accidentall?
A57975Asa his enemies fought against him for his sins, and the peoples sins; shall Moses and the people, Hezekiah, Asa, do then nothing but pray and suffer?
A57975Athanasius said, God hath given Davids Throne to Kings: What, to be Head of the Church?
A57975Barclay, William, 1570?-1630?
A57975Because God is light of lights, doth he not enlighten the earth and aire by the mediation of the Sun?
A57975But have we now Kings immediately sent as Saul was?
A57975But how came they to their Thrones for the most part?
A57975But it may be asked, if no passive subjection at all be commanded as due to Superiours?
A57975But the question is, concerning the designation of the person?
A57975But what Law?
A57975But what doth this prove?
A57975But what ground( saith the Royalist) is there to take Arms against a King?
A57975But what is all this?
A57975But what then?
A57975But whence is it that a man free is now snared as a beast in a gin or trap?
A57975But where are Kings persons, as men, said to be of God, as the Royaltie in abstracto i ●?
A57975But why stand we on the place?
A57975By this?
A57975By what antiquity doth the Crosse signifie Christ?
A57975By what word of God can the King close the mouth of the man of God, whom Christ hath commanded to speake in his name?
A57975Can Fathers decide Controversies better then the Word of God?
A57975Can he be a Father, and a Guide, a Patron to us against our will?
A57975Can this man pray for the King?
A57975Channels?
A57975Did Julian rejoyce in Gods salvation?
A57975Doe not subjects by flight lay restraint upon a Kings power, that he kill not the subjects without cause?
A57975Doe not they that resist the Parliaments power, resist the Parliament?
A57975Eliah said more to Ahab then What hast thou done?
A57975Every Prince is subject to God, but not as a vassal: for a Master may commit felonie, and lose the proprietie of his farme; can God do so?
A57975For I demand, How doth the son succeed to his fathers Crown, and Throne?
A57975For why will he submit all other controversies to the judgement of the Fathers?
A57975God complaineth of the violence of Kings: Is it not for you to know judgement?
A57975God hath joyned King and Power: who dare seperate them?]
A57975Had the Lords of the Philistims, have the States of Holland no power but from a Monarchie?
A57975Hast thou eaten of the tree whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?
A57975Hath the Father and the sonne, the Master and the servant one Morall subsistence?
A57975Have I conceived all this people?
A57975Have the Venetians any power from a King?
A57975He should be under one Law of God to be executed by men, and not under another Law?
A57975Heare our Prelate: How is it imaginable that Kings can be said to Iudge in Gods place, and not receive the power from God?
A57975How can that be a permissive Law of God, and not his approveing Law by which Kings create inferiour judges?
A57975How could they make their Emperours absolute?
A57975How is the spirit of Prophecie and Government infused in them, as in King Saul?
A57975How shall violence remove violence?
A57975How the inferiour Iudge is the deputy of the King?
A57975How then are we to beleeve, that God would make an universall Law contray to the Law that he established before Israel had a King?
A57975How then can the Liar say, that the Puritan conspireth with the Iesuite?
A57975How then can there be any majestie derived from them?
A57975How was any thing extraordinary, and above a Law, seeing David might have killed his enemie Saul, and according to Gods Law he spared him?
A57975How will this black mouthed Calumniator, make Presbyterians to dethrone Kings?
A57975I am God, I sit in the seat of God, should not be controlled by the Prophets, and no man should say to them, What sayest thou?
A57975I ask when these Emperours took away lives and goods at pleasure, Was that power ordained by God?
A57975I ask when these Emperours took away lives and goods at their pleasure; was that a power ordained of God?
A57975I conceive not; hath the adopted sonne his life, his being, the figure bodily, the manners of the sonne in whose place he is adopted?
A57975I pray you, who are the oppressors?
A57975I pray, P. P. what is this Church power?
A57975If Aaron make a golden Calfe, may not Moses punish him?
A57975If Moses turne an Achab, and sell himselfe to doe wickedly, ought not 80 valiant Priests and Aarons both rebuke, censure, and resist?
A57975If he have such a power as a King given him of God to destroy and waste the people?
A57975If he meane the King in abstracto, that is, the royall dignity, whom speaketh he against?
A57975If the King bring in an Army of forraigners, then a politique community must defend it selfe in a rationall way; Why?
A57975If the King say Masse, shall the Church judge and censure the King for intrusion?
A57975If the King( saith he) shall vex the Common- wealth or one part thereof, with great and intollerable cruelty; what shall the people do?
A57975If the Traveller contend to have his purse againe, shall the Robber say, Robberie was blessed with peace?
A57975If the inferiour Iudges in the act of judging, were the Vicars, and Deputies of King Jehoshaphat, he would have said, Judge righteous judgement; Why?
A57975If thou say, behold we know it not, doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it?
A57975If when the Parliament erreth, the remedy is left to the Wisedome of God, why not when the King erreth?
A57975If, and how the King may punish himself?
A57975In what Scripture hath God Almightie spoken of a fancied Prerogative Royall?
A57975In what sense Government is from God?
A57975Indigencie is the originall of Tutors, the Parents dye; what then shall become of the Orphan and his inheritance?
A57975Is authoritie subjected solely in the Kings Law, and no whit in his Person, though put upon him both by God and Man?
A57975Is it not supreme in its kinde of Church power?
A57975Is it not to deal thy bread to the hungry?
A57975Is it unlawfull with the sword to resist them?
A57975Is it( fit) to say to a King,( Thou art) wicked, and to Princes,( Ye are) ungodly?
A57975Is not this a punishment inflicted by inferiours upon a superiour, according to the way of Royalists?
A57975Is power of blood, either the Kings; or inherent inseparably in his Crown?
A57975Is the restraint laid on by mans law?
A57975Is there no lawfull resisting of ills of punishment, but meere prayers and patience?
A57975Is this an extolling of Kings?
A57975Is this inconsistent with Monarchie?
A57975Is this not a voluntary action, proceeding from a free active, elective power?
A57975Is this questioned, but Kings should be prayed for; or are we wanting in this duty?
A57975Is this the Prelates Logick?
A57975It is a vaine thing to say, Who shall be judge betweene the King and his subj ● cts?
A57975It is an ignorant speech, to ask, Is Authoritie subjected solely in the Kings Law, and no whit in his Person?
A57975It is true, where there is a King, soveraignty must be inviolable, What then?
A57975It were unlawfull to say to the King of Cyrus, What sayest thou?
A57975Knowest thou not, that I have power to crucifie thee?
A57975Lastly he saith, God tooke away Saul in his wrath; but I pray you did God onely doe it?
A57975Let us grant( saith he) that a societie shall refuse to have a Governour over them, shall they be for that free?
A57975Moses his face did shine as a Prophet receiving the Law from God, not as a King: and is this Sunshine of Heaven upon the face of Nero, and Julian?
A57975Mr. Bishop, what better is your Affirmanti incumbit,& c, then mine?
A57975Now is the King, as King, to intend this halfe end?
A57975Now what is the Pope of Rome his extent?
A57975Of the many Kings of Judah and Israel, how many chose this?
A57975One man hath not strength to fight against an Army of ten thousand: doth it follow?
A57975Or if jura majestatis be any such Prerogative?
A57975Royalists can not say so, what ground to say one of Davids acts in his deportment toward Saul was extraordinary, and not all?
A57975Shall the inferiour Judges be guilty of innocent blood, because the King will not doe his duty?
A57975Shall the people in that case serve the King of Kings, onely at the nod, and Royall command of an earthly King?
A57975Shall they obey man rather than God?
A57975Shall we take this upon the word of an excommunicated Prelate?
A57975Should not this be an unjust charge to the people, if God onely; without any action of the people, should immediatly set a King over them?
A57975Si enim hostes extran ● ● s, non tantum vindices occultos agere vellemus, deesset nobis vis numerorum& copiarum?
A57975Sittest thou to judge me after the Law?
A57975So God is the immediate Author of the Pastors, of the Apostles Office, ergo, it is unlawfull to resist a Pastor, though he turne robber?
A57975So all acts of taking away the lives of ill- doers, shall be acts of homicide in Holland: how absurd?
A57975So the King is not an in inferiour Iudge: What?
A57975Some Knights, some Ships, some Cities and Burroughes, do carry a crosse; are they made Christs vice- gerents of late?
A57975Some will have it in a collective body, but how?
A57975Sometimes all is cast upon ou ● mans voice, why may not the King be this one man?
A57975That is true, but was it not arbitrary to them to breake a law Physically?
A57975The King hath his right from God: What then, not from the people?
A57975The Parliament( saith Williams) may not command the King: Why then make they supplications to him, if their Vote be a Law?
A57975The Prelate eating his tongue for anger, striveth to prove, That all power, and so Royall power, is of God: but what can he make of it?
A57975The forme is for the action, therefore the action is more excellent then the forme, and an accident then the subject or substance?
A57975The people are to say, You are Gods, and your power is below, saith the Prelate: what then?
A57975The question is, For what end is a King made so happy, as to be exalted King?
A57975The question may be, which of these governments be most agreeable to nature?
A57975The state of the question is much perverted, for these be different questions, Whether the Kingdom may dethrone a wicked and Tyrannous Prince?
A57975The three hundred sinned in resisting Midian, and defeating them: Why?
A57975This Assembly is to judge, what Doctrine is treasonable; what then?
A57975To apply the subject to the accident, is it any thing else but to apply the accident to the subject?
A57975To whom can it be more proper to give the rule over men, then to him who is the onely King truely and properly of the whole world?
A57975V. Whether or no, the P. P. proveth, that Soveraignty is immediately from God, not from the people?
A57975WHether Government be by a divine Law?
A57975Was therefore Manasseh not lawfully called to the Crown?
A57975What King going forth to warre?
A57975What a meane resistance is?
A57975What a sinne is it to rob God, or the King of their due?
A57975What essentiall and fundamentall priviledges are left to Parliaments?
A57975What followeth?
A57975What force the Supreme Law hath over the King?
A57975What if he turne Tyrant, and destroy his Subjects with the sword?
A57975What if the King command not his people to serve God; or, What if he forbid Daniel to pray to God?
A57975What if the Royall line surcease?
A57975What is on man under no restraint, but made a God on earth, and so drunk with the graunder of a sinning- God, here under the Moone and Clouds?
A57975What is the law of the King, and his Power?
A57975What is this, but I inhibite you to be creators by omnipotent power?
A57975What law of man?
A57975What meaneth he?
A57975What more resistance is made to Royall power by wals interposed, then by Seas and miles of earth interposed?
A57975What more unbeseeming Kings is it to swear to do their duty, then to promise covenant wayes to do the same?
A57975What more vaine?
A57975What need Israel strive, when Moses and Aaron are two Independents?
A57975What power hath the King in relation to the Law, and the people?
A57975What power the People and States of Parliament have over the King, and in the State?
A57975What power the People, and States of Parliament, hath over the King, and in the State?
A57975What reason is in this consequence?
A57975What relation the King hath to the Law?
A57975What shall they reserve to make a new King, if this man dye?
A57975What then?
A57975What then?
A57975What then?
A57975What then?
A57975What then?
A57975What then?
A57975What then?
A57975What, shall it then follow, that he worketh nothing in the creatures by their mediation, as causes?
A57975What, will the Prelate make them independent Kings for that?
A57975What?
A57975What?
A57975What?
A57975What?
A57975When God doth apply the person to royall power, what?
A57975Whence is it that this man, rather then this man, is crowned King?
A57975Where is the Law of the Kingdome called a Law of punishing innocent people?
A57975Where is the negative voice of the King here?
A57975Where read he this?
A57975Where the word of a King is, there is power, And who may say unto him, What doest thou?
A57975Where the word of a King is, there is power: and who may say to him, what dost thou?
A57975Whether England be a conquered Nation at the beginning?
A57975Whether Government be warranted by a divine Law?
A57975Whether Magistrates, as Magistrates, be naturall?]
A57975Whether Monarchy be the best of governments?
A57975Whether Nature hath determined, that there should be one supreme Ruler a King, or many Rulers in a free Commnitie?
A57975Whether Royalists by cogent reasons do prove the unlawfulnesse of defensive warres?
A57975Whether Royall Power and definite forms of Government be from God?
A57975Whether Royall Power, and definite Forms of Government be from God?
A57975Whether Subsidies be due to the King as King?]
A57975Whether absolute and unlimited power of Royaltie, be a ray and beame of Divine Majestie, immediately derived from God?]
A57975Whether all Christian Kings are dependent from Christ, and may be called his Vicegerents?
A57975Whether all Governments be but broken Governments, and deviations from Monarchie?]
A57975Whether doth the P. P. with reason ascribe to us the doctrine of Jesuites, in the Question of lawfull defence?
A57975Whether doth the P. Prelate upon good grounds, ascribe to us the doctrine of Jesuites in these Questions of lawfull defensive Wars?
A57975Whether every free Commonwealth hath not in it a supremacie of Majestie, which it may formally place in one, or many?]
A57975Whether is Royaltie an immediate issue and spring of Nature?]
A57975Whether is the Coronation of a King any other thing but a Ceremonie?]
A57975Whether or no Goverment be warranted by the Law of nature?
A57975Whether or no Royall dignitie have its spring from nature, and how that is true( every man is born free) and how servitude is contrary to nature?
A57975Whether or no Soveraigntie is so from the people, that it remaineth in them in some part, so as they may in case of necessitie resume it?
A57975Whether or no Wars raised by the Estates and Subjects for their owne just defence against the Kings bloody Emissaries be lawfull?
A57975Whether or no any Prerogative at all above the law be due to the King?
A57975Whether or no are subjects more obnoxious to a King then Clients to Patrons, and servants to Masters, because the Patron can not be the Clients Judge?
A57975Whether or no he be more principally a King, who is a King by birth, or he who is a King by the free election and suffrages of the people?
A57975Whether or no passive obedience be a meane to which we are subjected in conscience by vertue of a Divine Commandement?
A57975Whether or no self- defence against any unjust violence offered to the life, be warranted by Gods Law, and the Law of Nature and Nations?
A57975Whether or no the King be Vnivocally, or only Analogically, and by proportion a father?
A57975Whether or no the King be in Dignity and Power above the people?
A57975Whether or no the King be in Dignity and power above the people?
A57975Whether or no the King be the sole supreme and finall interpreter of the Law?
A57975Whether or no the people have any power over the King, either by his oath, covenant, or any other way?
A57975Whether or no the people make a Person their King conditionally, or absolutely; and whether the King be tyed by any such covenant?
A57975Whether or no the people make a Person their King conditionally, or absolutely?
A57975Whether or no the sufferings of the Martyrs in the Primitive Church militate against the lawfulnesse of defensive wars?
A57975Whether or no, Soveraigntie is so in and from the people, that they may resume their power in time of extreme necessity?
A57975Whether or no, Wars raised by the Subjects and Estates, for their own just defence against the Kings bloody Emissaries, be lawfull?
A57975Whether or no, any Prerogative at all above the Law be due to the King?
A57975Whether or no, he be more principally a King, who is a King by birth, or he who is a King by the free election of the people?
A57975Whether or no, the King be onely and immediately from God, and not from the people?
A57975Whether or no, the King be the sole, supreme and finall Interpreter of the Law?
A57975Whether or no, the P. Prelate proveth, by force of reason, That the people can not be capable of any power of Goverment?
A57975Whether or no, the convening of the subjects without the Kings will, be unlawfull?]
A57975Whether or no, the people have any power over the King, either by his Oath, Covenant, or any other way?
A57975Whether or not Royall birth be equivalent to Divine Unction?
A57975Whether or not Royall birth be equivalent to divine unction?
A57975Whether or not a Kingdome may lawfully be purchased by the sole title of conquest?
A57975Whether selfe- defence by opposing violence to unjust violence be lawfull, by the Law of God, and Nature?
A57975Whether the Estates of Scotland are to help their Brethren the protestants in England against Cavaliers?
A57975Whether the King be above Parliaments, as their Iudge?
A57975Whether the King be above the Law or no?
A57975Whether the King be above the Law?
A57975Whether the King hath a Prerogative Royall above Laws?
A57975Whether the King hath any Royall prerogative, or a power to dispence with Lawes?
A57975Whether the King have the power of warre only?
A57975Whether the King may, in his actions, intend his owne Prerogative and Absolutenes?]
A57975Whether the King of Scotland be an absolute Prince, having Prerogatives above Parliament and Laws?
A57975Whether the King of Scotland be an absolute Prince, having prerogatives above Laws and Parliaments?
A57975Whether the P. Prelate conclude, that neither constitution, nor designation of Kings is from the people?
A57975Whether the Prelate proveth by force of reason, that the people can not be capable of any power of Government?
A57975Whether the Seas, Floods, Road- wayes, Castles, Ports, publike Magazine, Militia, Armour, Forts and Strengths be the Kings?]
A57975Whether the Subjects be obliged to pay the debts of the King?]
A57975Whether the power of Warre be onely in the King?
A57975Whether the power of the King as King be absolute, or dependent and limited by Gods first mould and paterne of a King?
A57975Whether the power of the King as King, be absolute, or dependent, and limited by Gods first mould and patern of a King?
A57975Whether the supreme Law, the safetie of the people, be above the King?
A57975Whether was King Uzzah dethroned by the People?]
A57975Which is the best government, that is, the most profitable, or the most pleasant, or the most honest?
A57975Who art thou that disputest with God?
A57975Who made the King?
A57975Who should then punish and coerce the Parliament in the case of exorbitance?
A57975Why did God at this time rather use an extraordinary meanes of saving his Church?
A57975Why is not royalty then founded on grace?
A57975Why might not the people of Israell, Peers or Sanedrim have convened before them, judged, and punished David, for his Adultery and Murther?
A57975Why not to the Prophets and Apostles?
A57975Why the King ● breathing Law?
A57975Why?
A57975Why?
A57975an 1641. never answered, couched under the name of inconveniency?
A57975an head over such as will not be menbers?
A57975and by the sole power of the bloudy sword?
A57975and he that keepeth thy soul, doth he not know it?
A57975and hee argueth from a morall duty, he is the Lords annoynted, therefore I will not kill him?
A57975and how did Israel conspire with Absolom, to unking and dethron ● David, whom the Lord had made King?
A57975and how doth the Lord v. 22. expresly shew to Samuel, and the people, the man that they might make him King?
A57975and shall he not render to every man, according to his work?
A57975and so what need to fetch a Royall power from Heaven, to be immediatly infused in him, seeing the people hath such a power in themselves at hand?
A57975and that Abbots and Priors were not in Gods book?
A57975and was it against the Oath of God to defend themselves by Armes?
A57975and was it not an act of tyranny in King Achab, to take the vineyard of Naboth, and in King Saul?
A57975and what needed Saul and David, who had more then royall birth, even divine unction, be made Kings by the people?
A57975and whereby the King may oppresse, and no man may say, What dost thou?
A57975and whether there be such a thing as a Covenant tying the King no lesse then his subjects?
A57975and why did David seek an oath of Ionathan?
A57975and why then do Royalists talk to us of Gods immediate creating of Kings, without any interveening action of the people?
A57975as David and Hezekiah?
A57975but had Herod and Pilate any warrant to crucifie him?
A57975can be said to judge in Gods place, and not receive the power from God immediatly, without any consent or covenant of men?
A57975dic ubi legis: and is this a proof of inconsistency of Presbyteries with a Monarchie?
A57975did God grant Nero his hearts desire?
A57975doth it exclude the peoples consent?
A57975ergo, the Pastor is above all the Kings Lawes?
A57975even to have peace and safety, surrender themselves fully to the power of a King?
A57975except they receive a power so to doe from God?
A57975have I begotten them?
A57975is this a different action from the peoples applying the person to royall dignitie?
A57975life eternall to Heathen Kings, as Kings?
A57975make any thing against the lawfulnesse of defensive warrs?
A57975may not the Soveraigne power be eminently, fontaliter; originally and radically in the people?
A57975no: or that David consulted the oracle of God, what to do when Saul was coming against him?
A57975non Reges quoque accidere solent?
A57975of France only an Hunter, Alphonsus Dux Ferrariensis only an Astronomer, Philippe of Macedo only a Musitian, and all because they are Kings?
A57975or doth he naturally resemble the father as the naturall sonne doth?
A57975or if jura Majestatis be any such Prerogative Royall?
A57975or is it from the people also, and their free choise?
A57975or is it subordinate to the King?
A57975or is the Iudgement the Kings?
A57975prove that in no case it is lawfull to resist the King?
A57975quid ergo?
A57975shall it follow that the soveraigne in concreto may not be resisted?
A57975that flying is resistance?
A57975to take the people of Gods fields and vineyards, and olive- yards, and give them to their servants?
A57975was it extraordinary that David fled?
A57975was this extraoardinary above a law?
A57975were not these Rulers lawfull Magistrates, armed with power from God?
A57975what then?
A57975will he guide me as a Father, an Husband against my will?