Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
33460( excerpt from his short essay"The World Wide Web: A very short personal history", 1998) 2005> Smartphones or ebook readers?
33460Can ebook readers like Sony Reader and Kindle really compete with cellphones and smartphones?
33460How valuable will it be?
33460Improbable?
33460Or is there a market for both smartphones and ebook readers?
33460Utopian?
11077Anyone with a press could run one off, subbing in any apocryphal text he wanted-- and who knew how accurate that translation was?
11077But take a closer look at that damning passage:[ PULL- QUOTE]> Download it for free from Corey''s site, read the first> page You see that?
11077Is this the end of the world?
11077She types 70 words per minute, and loves to show off grandsonular email to her pals around the pool at her Florida retirement condo)?
11077So, are bookwarez in violation of copyright law?
11077There was no incense, no altar boys, and who( apart from the priesthood) knew that reading was so friggin''hard on the eyes?
11077Viewing the book as a"practice"instead of an object is a pretty radical notion, and it begs the question: just what the hell is a book?
11077Why did Napster captivate so many of us?
532) Partly derivative from that, but obviously very dangerous to LC as host, do you see a role for the Library of Congress in all this?
533) How does one make the data available?
53And, if so, what are they and who might take them?
53Archival storage, use copies, browsing copies-- ought an attempt to set standards even be made?
53But how much quality can we afford to lose?
53But where, ERWAY inquired, does one stop including things that are available with Internet, for instance, in one''s local catalogue?
53But who maintains that register?, he asked.
53CONTENT IN A NEW FORM: WHO WILL USE IT AND WHAT WILL THEY DO?
53Can a distinction be drawn between potential users in setting standards for reproduction?
53Can it be accessed and viewed from other applications?
53Can many of the hurdles to using electronic information that some publishers have imposed upon databases be eliminated?
53Can one produce retrieval software advanced enough for the postdoctoral linguist, yet accessible enough for unattended general use?
53Can the rights of a database be protected?
53Content in a New Form: Who Will Use It and What Will They Do?
53Content in a New Form: Who Will Use It and What Will They Do?
53Deciding whether or not to incorporate a normative encoding structure into the databases?
53Deliver as CD- ROM, magnetic tape, or both?
53Did those present constitute a group with sufficient common interests to propose a next step or next steps, and if so, what might those be?
53Do we take pictures of it and perform OCR on it later?
53Does one attempt to eliminate the use of operators where possible?
53Does one use automated processes?
53Finally, how does one make the data available?
53How accurate does full text have to be in order to be useful?
53How are basic internal structures of documents, such as pagination, made accessible to the reader?
53How are the image documents physically presented on the screen to the reader?
53How can it be made available?
53How can quality control best be integrated into digitizing work flow that includes document indexing and storage?
53How closely is the multimedia document tied to the software for viewing it?
53How do different users react to imperfect text?
53How do we pull those three together?
53How does LC keep track of the appropriate computers, software, and media?
53How does the emergence of national and international education networks affect the use and viability of research projects requiring high investment?
53How does variation in the quality of microfilm, particularly in film produced to preservation standards, affect the quality of the digital images?
53How good must the archival standard be?
53How much are we prepared to pay to capture absolute fidelity?
53How should it be delivered?
53How will it give people access to it?
53How will that be done?
53How would she deposit OJCCT for copyright?, she asked, because the journal will exist in the mainframe at OCLC and people will be able to access it.
53If SGML, then the TEI?
53If one is selected, should it be SGML?
53If storage no longer poses such an impediment, what do we need to consider in building digitally stored multi- user databases of visual materials?
53In the analog world of photocopies and microfilm, the issue of fidelity to the original becomes paramount, as do issues of"Whose fidelity?"
53Is it important to obtain very high- quality images and text, etc.?
53Is it necessary to do that?
53Is there a"group"here?
53MYLONAS framed the issues in a series of questions: How do we acquire machine- readable text?
53Re fair and liberal networking policies, what are the risks to an electronic publisher?
53Re the issue of OCR versus rekeying, HOOTON posed several questions: How does one get text into computer- readable form?
53Should it be SGML?
53Should one convert Migne?
53Should one protect the rights of a database?
53Should one try?
53Should the database be encoded?
53Since this is a transitional medium, why even bother to create software to run on a CD- ROM?
53The conversion of PLD has evoked numerous unanticipated questions: How will information be used?
53The encoding of the database was also a hard- fought issue: Did the database need to be encoded?
53Thus, the question becomes, What is the most useful representation of text for a serious work?
53To be sure, one needs to know that something was italicized, but how can one get from one to the other?
53Transition period: How long and what to do?
53WHO ARE THE USERS AND WHAT DO THEY DO?
53Were there normative structures for encoding humanist texts?
53What about CD- ROM?
53What about networking?
53What about the TEI-- will it last, will it prove useful?
53What about the images?
53What are the trade- offs between vastly enhanced access, degrees of fidelity, and costs?
53What conventions are necessary to identify a document uniquely for storage and retrieval?
53What factors affect OCR accuracy?
53What kinds of things do users do with AM?
53What should the Library of Congress do next, if anything?
53What should the group do next, if anything?
53What topics were omitted or given short shrift that anyone would like to talk about now?
53Where is the database of record for storing bibliographic information about the image document?
53Will the Library mount it?
53and 2) How can one deliver a sufficiently robust set of information in an accessible format in a reasonable amount of time?
53and"Whose original?"