Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
34368If the normal allelomorph is thought of as the positive character, which one of the mutants is due to its loss or to its absence?
34368It may be asked what will happen when two factors whose loci are more than 50 units apart in the same chromosome are used in the same experiment?
52312Who shall say whether it is crime or punishment which has wrought the greater suffering in the world?
52312Who would have supposed it possible that the pollen- cells of a plant could be all of one type, and its egg- cells of two types?
15623Did they appreciate this?
15623Of what other American philosopher and theologian has this been true?
15623Who can estimate the eloquence of that simple fact?
15623Why did he do it?
36993Always doing or undoing something 37 Habitual fitfulness 38 Self- importance 40 Henry and Wolsey: Which led?
36993But what were the steps, and what especially was Elizabeth''s step?
36993Can he enlarge this chamber or contract that?
36993Can he, later, close a door here or open a window there?
36993Choice spirits are more numerous-- but are the spirits quite as choice?
36993Do we not indeed know too well the fate of those whose thought and will ran counter to his?
36993For, indeed, what is the use of being active, capable, confident and important in a closet?
36993If a brother is attached to his brother and does not quarrel with him, is he therefore poor- spirited?
36993If a parliament and a king see eye to eye, is it just to label the parliament throughout history as an abject parliament?
36993If by rare chance a servant sees, possibly on good grounds, a hero in his master, is he therefore a poltroon?
36993It might be asked, in passing, seeing that six wives is the sign of a perfect"monster"if three wives make a semi- monster?
36993Should we have loved, trusted, and reverenced a''monster of lust''?
36993What then might he have been had he been a statesman only, or a diplomatist or an ecclesiastic or a soldier only?
36993What was its meaning?
36993Why may we not combine all thankfulness for the early More and the early Savonarola, and all compassion for the later More and later Savonarola?
36993Yet how many of us are there who, if admitting to the full their greatness, do not belittle their follies?
36993or, if freely admitting their follies, do not belittle their greatness?
36993what its object?
34299But are these offspring any better than they would have been had their parents given birth to a larger number?
34299But what has meanwhile happened to the outer digits?
34299Can he do this well if he knows nothing of what the bent of the child''s genius from ancestral influence is?
34299Can we reconcile this want of correspondence?
34299Can we remove them?
34299Educate another for a blacksmith who should have been a preacher, is there not also a great loss?
34299How can an instinct like this have been acquired by being performed but once?
34299How can sexual cells develop brain cells, with their wonderful modes of action?
34299How can this egg, formed in special organs, develop other organs than those like the ones in which it was formed?
34299How can war injure children?
34299If you educate a boy which nature intended for a blacksmith for a preacher, has not the world lost something?
34299Is it a vain hope?
34299Is this not a grievous burden which cripples or paralyzes his life and reacts on his offspring?
34299Now, if acquired characters_ are not_ transmitted to offspring, how should these facts affect our methods of educating children?
34299The question now arises, How can the parent make use of this agent in altering the nature of a child from one that is not desirable to one that is?
34299What is the Germ- plasm?
34299Why should they crucify their desires for the benefit of the race?
34299evidently meaning,"How shall we train and educate him?"
8517( 2) By what means are these effects brought about, what is the physiological explanation of the influence of the gonads on the soma?
8517And then how should we account for the recessive white?
8517Are we to suppose that the upper half of the body or eye had a positive heliotropism and the lower half a negative heliotropism?
8517But how do we know that feathers in their origin were connected with flight?
8517But if this is the case, what is the male condition?
8517But it may be asked, What objection is there to the theory of natural selection as an explanation of adaptations?
8517But since these qualities segregate in the reduction divisions, how is it that the male quality in the_ f_ ovum does not make it a sperm?
8517But this leaves the question, what is lutein and why is it secreted?
8517But what determines the end of the pregnancy?
8517But what is sex but the difference between ovum and spermatozoon, between megagamete and microgamete?
8517Does this metamorphosis take place in the blind_ Drosophila_ of the milk- bottle?
8517He then asks, Through what agency is the environment enabled to act on the germ- plasm?
8517Here arises an interesting question-- namely, how does the hormone theory explain the phenomenon of metamorphosis any better than the mutation theory?
8517How can we suppose that the divisions shall be exactly equal or the growth always the same?
8517How comes it then that the female quality entirely disappears?
8517How then was it evolved?
8517If so, why should not antlers equally develop in the stallion or in the buck rabbit, or indeed in man?
8517In what sense then, can an ovum be male?
8517Is it merely the increasing distension of the uterus by the developing foetus?
8517Mais est- il impossible que malgré la différence de constitution physico- chimiques il soit influencé de la même façon?''
8517Moreover, if it is a mutation, why has it never occurred in any other class of Vertebrates except Mammals?
8517The consideration of the subject involves two questions:( 1) What are the exact effects of the removal of the gonads in male and female?
8517The problem then is, How did these distinct species arise?
8517The question is, what were the unit characters in the parent species?
8517The question remains, therefore, where are the factors of the somatic sex- characters?
8517The question then is, how did these factors arise?
8517The question then to be considered is, what determines parturition and menstruation?
8517They conclude that the interstitial cells supply a nutritive material( hormone?
8517What meaning are we to attach to the words''male ovum''or even''male producing ovum''?
8517What, then, is heredity?
8517Would the fish be any worse off if the lower side were coloured like the upper?
26438[ 22] Is it not probable that the best fliers would escape most frequently, or would pine most if kept confined? 26438 [ 52] What does this mean?
26438( 4) If use- inheritance has tamed the rabbit, why are the bucks still so mischievous and unruly?
26438And if use and disuse are the sole modifying agents in the case of the human jaw, why should men have any more chin than a gorilla or a dog?
26438Are we to suppose that the effect of the_ adult_ practice of parents was inherited at this early age?
26438Are we to suppose that the size of the human teeth is maintained by use at the same time that the jaws are being diminished by disuse?
26438But as artificial selection has lengthened the wings in some instances, why may it not have shortened them in others?
26438But could we rely upon the aid of use- inheritance if it really were a universal law and not a mere simulation of one?
26438Does individual improvement transmit itself to descendants independently of personal teaching and example?
26438Does it only transfer the newly- acquired weakness, and not the previous long- continued vigour?
26438How could the transmission of these varied effects to offspring be accounted for?
26438How is it that the subsequent inheritance of these effects has not been more satisfactorily observed and investigated?
26438How then can we rely upon use- inheritance for the improvement of the race?
26438If disuse has shortened them, as Darwin supposes, why has it also thickened them?
26438If injuries are inherited, why has the repeated rupture of the hymen produced no inherited effect?
26438If use- inheritance was not necessary in the case of Handel, whose father was a surgeon, why is it needed to account for Bach?
26438Is it not a significant fact that the alleged instances of use- inheritance so often prove to be self- conflicting in their details?
26438Is it not probable that permanent domestication was rendered possible by the inevitable selection of spontaneous variations in this direction?
26438Is use- inheritance, then, only effective for evil?
26438Under these circumstances how can we be sure of the actual efficacy of use- inheritance?
26438WOULD NATURAL SELECTION FAVOUR USE- INHERITANCE?
26438What will be the ultimate effect of plucking geese''s quills, and of the eider duck''s abstraction of the down from her breast?
26438Where is the necessity for even the remains of the Lamarckian doctrine of inherited habit?
26438Which effect of use does use- inheritance transmit in such cases-- the increased rate of growth, or the dilapidation of the worn- out parts?
26438Why are not the effects of this disuse inherited by the labourer''s infant?
26438Why is the Angora breed the only one in which the males show no desire to destroy the young?
26438Why is there not simultaneous variation in teeth and jaws, if disuse is the governing factor?
26438Why should it be thought incapable of reducing a pigeon''s wing or enlarging a duck''s leg?
26438Why should the non- transmission of that which was not transmitted be surprising?
26438Why then may not the ungainly hind- legs have been shortened by human preference independently of the inherited effects of disuse?
26438Will such modifications be inherited by the offspring of the modified individual?
26438Will the continued shearing of sheep increase or lessen the growth of wool?
26438Would shaving destroy the beard in time or strengthen it?
26438[ 24] How can increased use simultaneously shorten and thicken these bones?
26438_ NATURE SERIES_ ARE THE EFFECTS OF USE AND DISUSE INHERITED?
26438in spite of disuse?