Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier	question
A66406	And are we to discourse of them as if we were at some light and rustical Pastimes?
A66406	And then, why is it more absurd to pray to the Cross, than it is thus to adore it?
A66406	And why?
A66406	But is this any credit to it?
A66406	Did they formerly adore the Cross, and direct their Prayers to it in the solemn Offices of the Church?
A66406	Did they heretofore use, without Scruple, to Worship and to pray to Images, as if the persons thereby represented were before them?
A66406	For God''s sake are there no more decent Forms of Speech to describe these things by?
A66406	For did they in former times Formally pray to the Saints, and frequently beg those things of them, which are only in the power of God to grant?
A66406	How the Cross upon which Christ hung, may be Christ who hung upon the Cross?
A66406	How the Cross which they pray to Christ to bless, is made the stability of Faith, and increase of good Works?
A66406	Is it because it has produced any false Citations against them, or such as are insufficient?
A66406	Or, why is it absurd to pray to the Cross for That, which they have pray''d before may be communicated to the Cross?
A66406	Whether the Crosses used in the Religious Service of the Church of Rome be mere pieces of Wood,& c?
A66406	Whether they may not, and are not to adore the Cross, tho they may not adore a meer piece of Wood?
A66406	Who and what are these addressed to?
A66405	And then, to what do they pray, but to the Image of the Person represented?
A66405	But is this Argument mine, or was it produced to prove the Papists pray to Images?
A66405	For what is the Image, but the Image of the Person represented?
A66405	Indeed I had argued that if they do not pray to Images, Why are the Prayers used at the Consecration of them?
A66405	To what end are the Pilgrimages to them?
A66405	What do they honour, venerate, and kiss?
A66405	Why do they direct their Prayers to them?
A66405	Why do they suffer Persons to go long and tedious Pilgrimages to them?
A66405	Why do they tell us of a Divine Presence, that is, if not in them, yet with them, as Tursellinus affirms of that at Lorreto?
A66405	Why do they then in Terms pray to the Cross and the Veronica,& c?
A66405	Why do they write whole Books of the Miracles wrought by the Virgin Mary, and others Saints by their Images?
A66405	before what do they fall down?
A66405	to what do they offer Incense, but the Image of the Person represented?
A28435	But what a madness was this, to think to flatter the Divinity with Inhumanity?
A28435	Cum sis ipse nocens moritur cur victima pro te?
A28435	He that would ask, what the ancient Religion of the Heathens was?
A28435	If Shepherds go themselves astray, How should their Sheep ere find the way?
A28435	If he that Teaches, is to Learn, How should the Scholar truth discern?
A28435	Is it the mark or majesty of Power To make offences that it may forgive?
A28435	Now if the Law be good, what must the Law- giver be?
A28435	What Heathen Priests could with any confidence prohibit Murther, when they themselves did safrequently sacrifice poor innocent men in their Temples?
A28435	What have Sacrifices to do with sins?
A28435	What is more reasonable than to forbear those Lusts which will ruine us both here and hereafter?
A28435	What meaneth Nature by these divers Laws?
A28435	could none but their unenlightned Priests make peace between God and man, when sins were committed?
A28435	or who but a mad- man would condemn that Law for unjust, which prohibits him from murdering himself?
A28435	to content the Divine goodness with the affliction of his Creatures, and to satisfie the Justice of God with cruelty?
A28435	was there no address to be made to the Divine Majesty, but by their Intercession?
A28435	were they the Courtiers of Heaven, and must they be first bribed before men could receive a pardon for their sins?
A28435	with what justice could that Priest who assisted at the Rape of Paulina in the Temple of Apis, proscribe Adulteries or Rapes?
A42351	But doe they so?
A42351	Can they grow out of no ● tones but the stones of Temples?
A42351	Can they hang upon no walles but the walles of Temples?
A42351	It 〈 ◊ 〉 indeed, Hee afterward ● e them directions about 〈 ◊ 〉 building of it; But what ● that?
A42351	Say then; are Images such seasonable sights in Churches?
A42351	Things which doe so distemper and confound prayer, are such things so seasonable in the Houses of Prayer?
A42351	Yea, what walles so common, rotten, or prophane, but Images can bee content to be playstered upon them, hang''d and drawne round about them?
A42351	or are they so sutable unto such kinde of places?
A42355	And doth not the Name of The Jeal ● ● s God, sufficiently distinguish the true God from all other gods whatsoever?
A42355	And even in these last times( at least as far as the bounds of Rome extend) hath extremity of zeal been wanting unto the cause of Images?
A42355	And must all these, for strength of brain and ripenesse of judgement, needs come short of our little ones and very vulgar?
A42355	And shall then such kind of Images not onely be made of him, but also be commended unto his servants as the speciall motives unto devotion?
A42355	And whoever among the Heathen did more thoroughly rivet and imp the soul of man into an Image, toward the making it most perfect in Idolatry?
A42355	First therfore we demand who they are that such kind of Images do so work upon, are they believers, or are they unbelievers?
A42355	For can we be too cautelous or too timerous, how we provoke the jealousie of the most terrible God?
A42355	For is he able to make his countenance according?
A42355	For though a man may catch fish with a golden hook, yet who will judge it a profitable course to fish with a golden hook?
A42355	For though it be never so manifest that such kinde of things have mouths and speak not, eyes and see not,& c. yet such( who knoweth not?)
A42355	For what else meant those tumults, wars, and bloodsheds in the time of the Eastern Empire, about the setting up and pulling down of Images?
A42355	For what though the truth be never so abundantly preached amongst us?
A42355	For while the Lord calleth one way, what do they but call another way?
A42355	Or if he could, what should he be the better?
A42355	Or shall the tears which( belike) do flow from the beholders of such Images, be esteemed such undoubted arguments of such devotions?
A42355	Or shall the weakest of our times be supposed wiser and stronger than the wisest or strongest in former times?
A42355	Secondly, all the false Gods that ever were, what were they else( ordinarily) but Images?
A42355	Shall we suppose that there are not any weak ones or little ones amongst us?
A42355	Surely( may we not say?)
A42355	Thirdly, the least degree of humane honour( whereof only our question is) doth it not of necessity contein the honour of the heart?
A42355	Yea, and that also as well in the time of the Gospel as in the time of the Law?
A42355	Yea, finally, not only in their conditions, operations, and habitations, but also in their very natures, what more contrary than God and Images?
A42355	Yea, what kind of honour can be imagined but may be found denyed unto Images in the first half of that clause, Thou shalt not bowe down unto them?
A42355	have not all these fallen by Images?
A42355	is every child as ready to hear a preacher as to gape and gaze at a picture?
A42355	so also were it never so certain, what is the beholder the better for it?
A42355	the least lifting up of the eye, or the least motion of the lip, being able to do God more honour then multitudes of our hairs, who knoweth not?
A41594	And if We may do this in Words, may not we do it in any other way of Expressing our Sense, which Nature has given us, and are answerable to Words?
A41594	And if he Respects the Sacrament, may not he shew this exteriorly, by receiving it Kneeling?
A41594	And now what great difference here in this Point between the Two Churches?
A41594	And what Credit is this to his Church?
A41594	And what more Forcible Argument need any Dissenters to justifie their Separation from the Church of England?
A41594	But why at this time of the day should this Lecture be read to the People?
A41594	Can any thing be more clearly express''d?
A41594	Could a Man think, that any Church of England Divine would take so much pains to abuse and Ridicule his own Church?
A41594	Doth the English Church condemn the Historical or Civil use of Images?
A41594	How then do''s he contradict Gregory I. while he''s no more for Worshiping Images than he was?
A41594	I wo nt ask here; Why then do''s the Church of England use them in her Places of Worship?
A41594	Is not the Plot out of some People''s heads yet?
A41594	Is not this a rare Character of one Christian from another?
A41594	Is the Infection so lasting?
A41594	What kind of Church must she be, whilst she owns her self and These Idolaters to be Parts of the same Church?
A41594	What then is their Crime?
A41594	Why should any be tied to such Ceremonies, if those that instituted them were Idolaters?
A51303	And what likenesse can there be betwixt the glorious body of Christ Heavenly and spiritual, and an Image of any terrestriall matter?
A51303	But are there no Bogs, said he, nor Lakes betwixt this and the Castle?
A51303	But how can we help it in the Literal sense, if we will interpret with constancy and coherency?
A51303	But what Statuarie can carve out the Effigies of the Deity?
A51303	Can any thing more inflame the Souls of men with that mysticall lust after Idols then the Doctrines of this Nicene Synod?
A51303	For how can that consecrated Bread be said to be offered to an Idol?
A51303	For when should any pretend to be Apostles sent from God, but in that Age there were Apostles sent into the world by him?
A51303	Friends, said he, to those men he called, Is the way passable and safe through this green Plain to yonder Castle?
A51303	How easily then and naturally, or rather necessarily, does this Description of the Church of Laodicea fall upon the last Intervall?
A51303	Is not this therefore a fit Bishop of Pergamus, that perks thus above all Kings and Emperours and Princes of the earth?
A51303	Was not this an Antipas indeed then, and exactly opposing the sovereign Paternity of his Holiness of Rome?
A51303	What Philtrum more effectual to raise up that Idolomania, that being mad and love- sick after Images and Idols, then this?
A51303	What Victories or Dominion did the Church in Thyatira in Asia get over the Nations more then other Churches?
A51303	What a mighty Charm is this to make the Souls of the feeble to hang about these Images as if their Presence were the Divine Protection it self?
A51303	What can be Idolatry if this be not?
A51303	What can be a more full and expresse acknowledgement of the gross Idolatry of the Church of Rome then this, if Transubstantiation prove an Errour?
A51303	What can be more Carnaline- like then this?
A51303	What greater Blasphemy and Idolatry can be imagined?
A51303	What peace, so long as the whoredomes of thy Mother Jezebel and her witchcrafts are so many?
A51303	What peculiar thing then in this Church of Pergamus is there to require this Description?
A51303	What sentence can be more expresse then this?
A51303	Who is he that will harm you, if you be followers of that which is good?
A51303	Why might not other Churches be attaqued by them, and also discover them, as well as the Church of Ephesus?
A51303	Why should this be said to the Church of Philadelphia more then to any other of the Churches here specified?
A51303	Why therefore just Seven?
A51303	Why?
A51303	and why these?
A51303	are we not still the true Philadelphian Church, and the new Jerusalem descended from Heaven, in all the riches and glories thereof?
A51303	be said to be written?
A51303	pacto potest fieri nunc utî tu hîc sis,& domi?
A51303	what reason in the letter can be given of that?
A51303	who can it be but this Church of Philadelphia, as famous for feats of Arms as for Love, as we shall see in the process?
A97089	And how is it proved, that such an intermediate honour as this, may not securely be given to Saints, and their Images?
A97089	And why then, may we not bow to the Image of Jesus, as well as to the Name of Jesus?
A97089	And why this error should be imputable, either to treason in the one case, or to Idolatry in the other?
A97089	But in what sense?
A97089	But the question is; Quid dignum tanto tulit hic promissor hiatii?
A97089	But what if the Council say no such thing?
A97089	But what is this to the Doctor''s purpose?
A97089	But what proof does he give us for all this?
A97089	But why all this lavish of a passionate Rhetorique?
A97089	But, why must this form needs be idolatrous?
A97089	But, with the Doctor''s good leave, Why may there not be some intermediate kinds of worship, between a divine, and a meer civil worship?
A97089	Can any sober divinity brook such an inference from these premises, That the Pagans demons exquisitely answer to our Saints and Angels?
A97089	Can any thing, says he, more inflame the Souls of Men with that mystical lust after Idols, then the doctrine of this Nicene Synod?
A97089	Did not God command Moses to make two Cherubims of gold in the two ends of the Mercy- Seat?
A97089	Did not the Heathen charge S. Paul, that he had perswaded and turned away much People, saying that they be no gods, which are made with hands?
A97089	Do we worship Saints and Angels for gods?
A97089	Doctor?
A97089	How blank then will the Doctor''s charge look, upon the discovery of such disingenuity?
A97089	How does it follow from hence, that the body is double to it self?
A97089	How then do we here make the Virgin and other Saints fellow- distributers of grace and glory with Christ himself?
A97089	Is not this rare divinity?
A97089	Must the flower which yields a wholesome juyce to the industrious Bee, needs be bad, because the venomous Spider turns it into poison?
A97089	Nay, what if the Council deliver the quite contrary doctrine?
A97089	Then I enquire further, whether( for the same reason) the Name of a Person, be not a symbolical presence in its kind, as well as the image?
A97089	This question exceeds the reach of my judgment, how the Martyrs relieve those, who are certainly assisted by them?
A97089	Were not the two Cherubims in the most Holy Place, of Image- Work?
A97089	Were there not graven Cherubims on the Walls of the Temple?
A97089	What Philosopher ever spoke thus unphilosophically?
A97089	What Philtrum more effectual to raise up that Idolomania, that being mad and love- sick after images and idols, then this?
A97089	What follows?
A97089	What idolatry had it been to Petition Saint Paul for a favour, which he professed himself both ready and able to grant?
A97089	Why may we not say, that such was the worship, which was given to the Ark?
A97089	Why so?
A97089	Will Philosophy allow this inference for current?
A97089	Yet, under favour, why may not an image be like a separated Soul, as well as like an Angel or Cherubim?
A97089	and could this possibly be done, without bowing before Images?
A97089	do we call them gods?
A97089	do we sacrifice to them as gods?
A97089	do we take them for gods?
A97089	or how can the one be condemned of idolatry, but the other must incur the like brand?
A97089	or, why more to idolatry in the one case, then to treason in the other?
A97089	whether they are pre ● ent by themselves, at the same time, in so many several places where the benefit of their succour is received?
A97089	which Abraham gave to the Angels?
A64364	Abrenuntias Satanae?
A64364	Amentia Deum credere, quem tute ipse formaris?
A64364	Amongst the Romans who excelled Varro in knowledg?
A64364	And doth not the Devil sometimes work such wonders?
A64364	And how appeareth it that he ever helped at a distance in that dreadful sickness, which requires a Domine Miserere?
A64364	And how many Spies are there Jewish, and Mahometan, and Heathen, to whom it is morally impossible to know their distinctions?
A64364	And how many of the same Communion have gross and stupid minds and devotions begotten of ignorance?
A64364	And is not she called the Guardian of France, and the North- star a of her Imperial City?
A64364	And we must confess these instruments or vessels are the work of mens hands; but have they mouths and speak not, eyes and see not?
A64364	And what are such Gems but Idols, when there is an expectation from them of supernatural virtue, which God hath not communicated to them?
A64364	And what uncharitableness is it to make a Ditch in the daily walks of the Blind, and the Weak, and the inadvertent?
A64364	And where their own worship of Images maketh them think the Christians not far from their Religion?
A64364	And who can at this distance of time, and after so many revolutions, search every fold in their imagination?
A64364	And who knows whether it hath not sometimes Canonized evil men?
A64364	Art thou not he from everlasting, O Lord my God, mine Holy One?
A64364	But by my name 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 was I not known unto them?
A64364	But how doth one external sign split, in each single exhibition of it, into two significations, appear to signifie doubly, to the common spectators?
A64364	But how if God doth this by Nature, or sometimes by miraculous Power, for the trial of our Faith?
A64364	But is this manifest from Plato himself?
A64364	But what Art of thinking teacheth them to draw consequences on this fashion?
A64364	But why may it not signifie both the Statue and the Temple?
A64364	But yet it may be demanded, whether the Forms and practice of a corrupt Church may not contradict their general Rule of Faith?
A64364	But, in all Assemblies, how few are good Judges?
A64364	But, what are the particulars( I beseech you) in which I may seem to offend the Platonists?
A64364	D. ubi habitat Deus?
A64364	Did not they stagger betwixt the new Religion of Baal g, learned from the Zidonians?
A64364	Et omnibus operibus ejus?
A64364	Et omnibus pompis ejus?
A64364	Faith, as of one that cureth the Dancing- sickness known by the name of Chorea sancti viti?
A64364	Fifthly, When, and for what reason, it was divided into the Worship of Apis and Mnevis?
A64364	For Idols, who is there that doubts whether they be void of all perception?
A64364	For are not the three Kings of Colen as such, a very fiction?
A64364	For does not Reason thence collect her Idea of God, conceiving of him as of the mighty and wise framer of the Universe?
A64364	For now( said he) his Glory is much greater than it appeared on the Mount, which if his Apostles were then dazled with, how can it now be expressed?
A64364	For what Christian will deny the Petition of his Neighbour, when he desireth him only to pray to God for him?
A64364	For who does not honour those he swears by?
A64364	Fourthly, At what time this Idolatrous Worship of the Symbol of Moses commenced in Egypt?
A64364	God assisting us with this Image, why should any religious Acts have any lower object total or partial?
A64364	How can it be, if so they think, that the accusation of St. Paul before cited shall not also appertain unto them?
A64364	How could that be?
A64364	How do you expound it?
A64364	How doth that appear?
A64364	How shall the people not fall into Idolatry, when such false Shechinahs or Idols are layd in their way?
A64364	How then come the Books of the Heathens to be fill''d with stories of Miracles wrought in or at their Images, as well as those of the Romanists?
A64364	I grant it is so; but is not the like Apology used in justification of Image- worship, by that Society of which Petavius was a a Brother?
A64364	If he speaks not like a true Roman Catholick, from whom shall we hear the words of a son of that Church?
A64364	If the Tetractys of Pythagoras be not the Tetragrammaton of Moses; what other thing is it?
A64364	If they do not apply themselves to them as such, why do they use such Forms in their Prayers?
A64364	In the mean time I only put this short question, What was it that excited the first man that pray''d to such a Saint?
A64364	In those times he spake not himself immediately; for how can a Divine Subsistence be, meerly of it self, corporally vocal?
A64364	In what other sense will any man, whose prejudice does not bend him a contrary way, interpret the following places?
A64364	Is not think you St. Almachius a substantial Patron?
A64364	Jupiter, saith Arnobius a, hath Father, and Mother, how can he then be a God?
A64364	Let it then be granted( for why should men oppose the evidence of plain words?)
A64364	Non videtis''sub istorum simulachrorum cavis — mures — babitare?
A64364	Now what can we judg of that Worship which hath for its object something else besides God, and is contrary to the Scripture?
A64364	Now what is swearing by those whom[ in Baptism] you have forsworn[ or renounced] but a corrupting of the Faith with Idolatry?
A64364	Now what seemeth all this but refined Heathenism?
A64364	Now what think you was the occasion of this excess of Marian- zeal?
A64364	Of the Egyptian Apis; Whether he were Moses?
A64364	Or what if such things should be done by Gods just permission, by the Devil himself, to men that have renounced their Reason?
A64364	Other Prophets argue with Idolaters from their own experience; and appeal to them, whether their Idols could hear, or see, or help them?
A64364	Quamdiu suer ● … nt in Paradiso?
A64364	Secondly, Why Moses was honoured by an Ox?
A64364	So the god of the Muggletonians rob''d of his Spirituality, immensity, subsistences; what is he but their Idol?
A64364	Some superstitious ones, how devoutly do they complement with a Candle,& c?
A64364	THis being confessed, There is a Second inquiry to be made, whether such Gentiles worshipped him, or made Religious Application to him?
A64364	The same Author a while after, propoundeth this Query: Do not Catholicks pray to Images and Relicks?
A64364	Thirdly, Though the sympathy of the Saint be a direction to him or her, how doth this direct Mariners to the Virgin Mary in a Tempest?
A64364	Thirdly, Whence that Symbol received the name of Apis?
A64364	Thy Garments are unclean, and art not thou, at all, concerned at it?
A64364	What Deities then were the extreams betwixt which these unstable and giddy Israelites did visibly stagger?
A64364	What be such Saints to whom the safe- guard of such Cities are appointed, but Dii Praesides with the Gentiles Idolaters?
A64364	What can a peaceable Christian think of the Saintship of Pope Hildebrand, or St. Gregory the seventh?
A64364	What could have an Heathen man done more, who believed Jupiter to be a God?
A64364	What else are S. Sulpitius, and S. Severus, considered as distinct persons?
A64364	What else are the seven sleepers, considered as such?
A64364	What else was AEsculapius whom their Jove( themselves confessing it) smote with his Thunder d?
A64364	What may that be?
A64364	What notion will Reason give us of the true God, if it supposeth such wisdom and power in a creature as can make the World?
A64364	What other construction can a wise man make of the story in Mathew Paris concerning the Specter said to appear to the Earl of Cornwall a?
A64364	What then is the meaning of the making of the World, and the novity of its essence, so often mentioned in the School of Plato?
A64364	When they apply themselves in a strom to the Virgin Mary; do not they the like to those who in perils by water called on Venus l?
A64364	Whether amongst them they take not away some honour from God, though not that which is absolutely incommunicable?
A64364	Whether the Roman Forms be applied to that Rule of Faith by any but prudent Ecclesiasticks and Laicks, who are not the greater number?
A64364	Who crosseth the Ocean, and visiteth the Mexican America, and observeth not that St. Joseph is made the Patron of new Spain?
A64364	Who entreth Paris and heareth not St. Geneviefve celebrated as the Protectress of it?
A64364	Who hath directed the spirit of the Lord, or being his counseller hath taught Him?
A64364	Who hath measured out c the waters in the hollow of his hand?
A64364	Who hath( f) directed the Spirit of the Lord, or being his counsellor hath taught him?
A64364	Who travelleth to Utopolis or S. Veit, and seeth not the four Chappels on the four Hills of S. Veit, S. Ulrick, S. Laurence, S. Helena?
A64364	Who understandeth the ancient estate of England, and is ignorant of the Veneration which it hath had for its presumed Patron St. George?
A64364	Why are the people directed in the choice of them, and advis''d to an especial affiance in them a?
A64364	Why do his Followers maintain that the dead do no otherwise live to God than as there is in him a firm purpose of their Resurrection d?
A64364	Why do the Popes in their many Bulls declare them to be Patrons of such places, and helpers in such particular cases?
A64364	Why do they as well call on the Virgin, as on the highest Angel for Guardianship?
A64364	Why do they give them the name of Patron, and Guardian- Saints?
A64364	Why is there mention in their Authors, of their appearance in person to their Supplicants, with present aid, and further assistance?
A64364	Why then do not the Arians whilst they are of the same mind, number themselves among the Greeks[ or Gentiles]?
A64364	Yea, before the day I was he, — I will work, and who shall let it?
A64364	a copy written in some Roll*, or engraven in some stone according to the pattern of the Tables brought down from the Mount?
A64364	and if to both, whether in equal or unequal degrees?
A64364	and whether they were not the works of mens hands which they adored a?
A64364	and who instructed him, and taught him in the path of judgment?
A64364	call the Nous, one Thing, Being, or Person?
A64364	do we pray to them; though in the use of them we supplicate God?
A64364	for what apprehensions greater than these do we entertain concerning the true God, when we call upon him, confide in him, or revere him?
A64364	for what else was there in the other Ark?
A64364	how it should come to pass that a Symbol so known in Egypt, should at length every- where be mistaken?
A64364	must not they make a like judgment of such as Anna Trapnell c, who believed for a while, that God dwelt essentially in his Saints?
A64364	or why look you so earnestly on us, as though by our own power, or holiness, we had made this man to walk?
A64364	p. 1038 and Mr. Mede''s Answer, p. 1041, 1042. b Foxe''s great Mystery, p. 16. is not that of God, which comes out of God?
A64364	p. 1254, 1255. d Quis non tum laudes gratesque sacrae Virgine Corde, Ore, plausu, dixit?
A64364	supplicare tremebundum fabricatae abs te rei?
A64364	with whom took he counsel?
A64364	— Is there a God besides me?
A64364	— Quid enim aliud est natura, quam Deus, toti mu ● … do& partib ● … s ejus inserta?
A64364	— fed nos deum, nisi sempiternum, Iutelligere quî possumus?
A64364	— in ore — ab Araneis ordiri retia?
A71070	( thought I) is it come to this at last?
A71070	And after all this is it possible to believe that St. Augustin should make the Churches decree in a General Council infallible?
A71070	And after all this, can not we understand so much as the common necessaries to salvation by the greatest and most sincere endeavour for that end?
A71070	And all this while is your Church innocent, which at least sees and will not reform these things?
A71070	And are not such Confessors excellent Guides to Heaven the mean while?
A71070	And are we not here again arrived at Church- infallibility, if not from extraordinary divine assistance, only sincere endeavour being supposed?
A71070	And can there be a Doctrine invented by men that doth more effectually destroy the necessity of a good life than this doth?
A71070	And canst thou for thy heart, good Reader, expect a more pregnant proof?
A71070	And did none of these men understand the principle that is undenyable by any man of common sense?
A71070	And do any of these excuse them by saying any doctrine of theirs was contrary to these particulars?
A71070	And doth this make the Church of England infallible?
A71070	And if it doth not in the case of Provincial Councils; why should he think it doth in the case of General?
A71070	And is it not possible for them to have an esteem for those who are not of their own Party?
A71070	And is it now imaginable after all this, that Dr. Field should make any particular Church infallible?
A71070	And is not this now an Universal Tradition fit to be matched with that of the Scriptures?
A71070	And they who have been so bold( shall I say?
A71070	And wh ● then?
A71070	And what assurance can you give us that you do not still complain without cause?
A71070	And what can the most skilful men in the Scripture, do with such men, who deny or affirm what they please?
A71070	And what can they give us in exchange for these?
A71070	And what fruits think you could it bear, but most gross Idolatry, greater than which was never known among the Gentils?
A71070	And what if he were afterwards present at the Council of Constantinople?
A71070	And what injury have I done them now, in charging such things upon them which obstruct devotion and overthrow the necessity of a good life?
A71070	And what saith I. W. to all this?
A71070	And yet after all this, can not the most necessary parts of it, he understood by those who sincerely endeavour to understand them?
A71070	Are any cautions given to Confessors to beware of these Doctrines?
A71070	Are any of the Books censured which assert this Doctrine?
A71070	Are any of the Defenders of it discountenanced?
A71070	Are no curious controversies handled in them?
A71070	Are the Dominicans Puritans and no Papists?
A71070	Are the Iesuits all out of the Church of Rome, because they deny the efficacy of Grace which the Domini ● ans account a matter of faith?
A71070	Are these such inconsiderable parts of the Body, that no regard is to be had to them?
A71070	Articles?
A71070	Articles?
A71070	Be it so: but I hope it doth evince that the Subscribers did not think the main Doctrine of any one Homily to be false?
A71070	But I pray, Sir, are Authority and Infallibility all one in your account?
A71070	But because we can not think highly enough of God, must we therefore devise ways to expose him to contempt and scorn?
A71070	But by what means doth he then think, that men may come to any certainty about the true meaning of Scripture?
A71070	But did not the Arians plead Scripture as well as they?
A71070	But doth he not say, the Jesuits have solemnly renounced the Doctrine?
A71070	But doth he undertake to make this good, that the greater number of Christians, then in the world, did oppose the Church of England?
A71070	But here lyes the main difficulty, on what account the sentence of the Church was to be followed?
A71070	But how doth this, destroy all Authority in a Church?
A71070	But how then can they free themselves from this imputation?
A71070	But if there be such difficulties, is there nothing plain and easy?
A71070	But if we take away this Infallible direction from the Guides of the Church, what Authority is there left them?
A71070	But is it not a pleasant thing to see, all of a sudden, what zeal these men discover for the preservation of our Churches Authority?
A71070	But is there any thing peculiar to my Principles herein?
A71070	But suppose they were the Puritans that said it?
A71070	But supposing those Churches be rejected, why must the Greek, which embraces all the Councils which determined those subtle controversies?
A71070	But was not Whitgi ● ● for the Lambeth Articles?
A71070	But what course was taken in this important Controversie to find out the certain sense of Scripture?
A71070	But what if Ignatius himself being grown old, did suspect such frequent extasies and visions for illusions?
A71070	But what is all this to our purpose?
A71070	But what rocks and Precipices will a bad cause drive men upon?
A71070	But what then?
A71070	But what then?
A71070	But where lyes the contradiction?
A71070	But whereabouts I pray doth this second Testimony stand?
A71070	But wherein I pray doth this blasphemy lye?
A71070	But why no answer to this charge?
A71070	But why so?
A71070	But will not the same sincerity in the Guides of the Church, extend to their knowing and declaring all matters of Faith?
A71070	But you who are so good at resolving faith, what is this verily believe of yours founded upon?
A71070	By this rule the Prophets and Apostles, nay our Lord himself, were unavoidably Fanaticks; for what competent authority had they to countenance them?
A71070	Can any fairer terms than these be desired?
A71070	Can not a dull Book come out with my name in the Title, but I must be obliged to answer it?
A71070	Can this be understood any other way than of their own sense of matters of faith?
A71070	Canon of the Council of Nice the Samosatenian Baptism is pronounced null?
A71070	Did I not cite the words of God himself, who therefore did forbid the making any likeness of him, because nothing could be like him?
A71070	Did he not declare all that was necessary for that end, in his many admirable discourses?
A71070	Did not King James understand what he said, and what they did?
A71070	Do they appeal to any infallible Guides?
A71070	Do you think any man would venture his person or his purse, on no better security?
A71070	Doth T. G. think so in all other Sacraments?
A71070	Doth he not mention their Doctrine, and their distinctions?
A71070	Doth he till them that God had appointed Infallible Guides in his Church, to whom appeal was to be made in all such cases?
A71070	Doth that Man destroy the authority of Parents, that refuses to obey them, when they Command him to commit Treason?
A71070	Doth the strength of all lye upon my bare affirming or denying?
A71070	Doth this make all his authorities false and his reasons unconcluding?
A71070	For I dare say, the King never thought the Pope infallible; must be needs therefore think him a Puritan?
A71070	For doth not the Council of Trent make Orders a Sacrament?
A71070	For either he may go to heaven without him, or not?
A71070	For in earnest Sir, did not our Saviour speak intelligibly in matte ● s of so great importance to the Salvation of Mankind?
A71070	For otherwise it would be just, as if one should say to a man, that asked him, whether he might safely travel through such a Country?
A71070	For what can more expose men to all the follies and delusions imaginable, than this will do?
A71070	For who dare rely upon him who acts against his conscience and believes one way and does another?
A71070	Had I not proved by clear and late Instances, that the party which owns these principles is to this day the most countenanced and encouraged at Rome?
A71070	Had I not proved by plain testimonies, that the most Fanatick principles of Rebellion were owned by the Jesuitical party among them?
A71070	Have I made the practice of true devotion ridiculous, and the real expressions of piety the subject of scorn and derision?
A71070	Have not all who have written against the Church of Rome opposed the pretence of Infallibility?
A71070	Have you not formerly complained thus, when Books too many have been Printed and published in England?
A71070	Have you the authority of your Church for it?
A71070	Here a Man must examine the notes of the Church, and enquire whether they be true notes, whether they agree only to the Roman Church?
A71070	Here comes the mystery of the procession of the Holy Ghost to be examined, whether from the Father alone or from the Father and the Son?
A71070	How came all the Copies to be corrupted at once, as he farther urges, that there are none left sound to correct others by?
A71070	How comes it then to pass, that all Church- Authority is immediately gone, if we do but suppose a possibility of errour in those which have it?
A71070	How doth he know that the Eastern, Armenian, Abyssin and Greek Churches did agree with the Church of Rome against us?
A71070	How is it I beseech N. O. that my principles undermine all Church Authority?
A71070	How long I pray have these days of persecution been?
A71070	I desire to know, whether this makes all their present arguments for the Roman Church of no force?
A71070	I now come to examine what certainty there is for this Infallibility?
A71070	I now desire to know, what a person in that time should do who was bound to yield an internal assent to the Guides of the Church?
A71070	I only desire to know, why a like right and saving faith may not be had concerning the Scriptures, without their Churches infallibility?
A71070	I wonder who there could be in that Age; that believed the Pope to be an infallible Guide?
A71070	I. S. who hath written a whole Book purposely against this Principle, as impious and atheistical?
A71070	If it be not so in other Sacraments how comes it to be thus in Orders?
A71070	If it be not then necessary to mens Salvation to have an infallible interpretation of doubtful places; for what other end can it become necessary?
A71070	If some may destroy themselves by their own weakness and folly, may not others be saved by their diligence and care?
A71070	If the Church of Rome will allow nothing to be amiss, how can she Reform any thing?
A71070	If the possibility of being deceived destroys no other Authority in the world, why should it do that of the Church?
A71070	If the sense of Scripture were in this time to be taken from the Guides of the Church, what security could any man have against Arianism?
A71070	If they did, how that comes to be obscure now, which was plain then?
A71070	If your Church may hav ● liberty not to determin those nice points why may not ours?
A71070	Is God as much disparaged by the necessary weakness of our understandings, as by voluntarily false and corporeal Images of him?
A71070	Is all this nothing but to charge them with such practices which they detest?
A71070	Is infallible Faith come to be sufficiently certain only?
A71070	Is not this a hopeful beginning for a good Legend?
A71070	Is not this now an Admirable way of proving, that they do not charge them with Idolatry, because the Papists deny they commit it?
A71070	Is there 〈 ◊ 〉 danger of falling into the ditch whe ● the Blind lead the Blind, unless General Council expresly allow of it?
A71070	Is this a sufficient reason for any man to cast off his subjection to his Prince, because it''s possible he may require something unlawful?
A71070	It was a notable saying, and it is great pity, the Historian did not preserve the memory of the Author of it; but by whom was it said?
A71070	Iust so saith T. G. how can they be charged with Idolatry, since they profess to do no such thing?
A71070	Must I do it only by an infallible Guide?
A71070	Must he adhere to the Nicene Council?
A71070	Must he believe the Council?
A71070	Nay doth not God design to prevent the errour of our Imaginations by such prohibitions as those are?
A71070	Now, what an easie matter is it to disposses me of this Spirit of contradiction, which he imagines me possessed with?
A71070	Or can we have now no certainty of the meaning of the Levitical Law, because there is no High- priest or Sanhedrin to explain it?
A71070	Or 〈 ◊ 〉 this Doctrine only a Decoy to draw great sinners into your nets?
A71070	So then, he must he Puritanically inclined; but whence does that follow?
A71070	The Primitive and Apostolical?
A71070	The first is in the charge of Idolatry; but how do I contradict my self about this?
A71070	The last thing to be considered is, whether the same arguments which overthrow infallibility, do likewise destroy all Church- Authority?
A71070	The truly Catholick Church of all Ages?
A71070	Therefore why should we think much if it be so in Religion too?
A71070	To whom will ye liken God?
A71070	Was ever man put to such miserable shifts?
A71070	Was not this think we, a true Vicar of Christ?
A71070	Were the Israelites then in the Beatifical vision?
A71070	Were 〈 ◊ 〉 these Puritans too?
A71070	What Church I pray?
A71070	What certainty there is of this infallibility?
A71070	What competent Authority had any of the Prophets who were sent to the ten Tribes?
A71070	What competent authority had the Prophet Elijah to countenance him, when all the Authority that then was, not only opposed him but sought his life?
A71070	What course now doth Irenaeus take to clear the sense of Scripture in these controverted places?
A71070	What he thinks of the Religion of the Patriarchs, who received their Religion by Tradition, without any such Infallibility?
A71070	What if, the nature of Religion will not bear such a determination of Controversies as civil matters will?
A71070	What is become 〈 ◊ 〉 all their vast Tomes of Scholastical an ● Casuistical Divinity?
A71070	What is this, but to put them under a necessity of being deluded when their Guides please?
A71070	What necessity there is for the Salvation of persons, to have an infallible interpretation of controverted places of Scripture?
A71070	What pity it is for sinners, you have not the keeping of Heaven- gates?
A71070	What the grounds are, on which any thing doth become necessary to salvation?
A71070	What then makes these Churches to be left out in our Enquiries after the Guides of the Catholick Church?
A71070	What things are necessary to be owned in order to salvation by Christian Societies, or as the bonds and conditions of Ecclesiastical communion?
A71070	What things are necessary to the salvation of men as such, or considered in their single or private capacities?
A71070	What wonder then saith he, if Bellarmin and 3. or 4. more Jesuits were carried away with such a Torrent of Doctors who went before them?
A71070	What would not they do for the strengthening and upholding of it?
A71070	What?
A71070	What?
A71070	What?
A71070	What?
A71070	Whence could this arise but from looking on it as the Doctrine of their Church?
A71070	Whether God doth ever Inspire persons with immediate revelations without giving sufficient evidence of such Inspiration?
A71070	Whether our Saviours own Sermons vere capable of being understood by those who heard them, without some infallible Interpreter?
A71070	Whether the Church may justly be charged with those Doctrines and practices?
A71070	Whether the Evangelists did not faithfully deliver our Saviours Doctrine?
A71070	Whether the denying such an Infallible Interpreter makes men uncapable of attaining any certain sense of doubtful places?
A71070	Whether there be an equal reason to look for revelations now, as in the time of the Prophets, and our Saviour, and his Apostles?
A71070	Whether there be no difference between kneeling at the Sacrament upon Protestants Principles and the Papists adoration of the H ● st?
A71070	Whether there can be any greater Fanaticism, than a false pretence to immediate divine Revelation?
A71070	Whether there can be no certainty of Faith without Infallibility in the Guides of the Church, and submitting our internal assent and belief to them?
A71070	Whether there can be no certainty of Faith without this infallibility?
A71070	Whether we are bound to believe all such who say, They have divine revelations?
A71070	Who meddles with what they profess they do, or do not?
A71070	Why did not God as well forbid the one as he did the other?
A71070	Why may we not then allow any Authority belonging to the Governours of the Church, and yet think it possible for them to be deceived?
A71070	Why not as well to those of the Eastern, Greek, or Protestant Churches?
A71070	Will he, saith he, or they damn the execrable Covenant?
A71070	Would not a man now be in a pretty condition that were bound to believe one in all he said that so often contradicted himself?
A71070	a man of an Apostolical Spirit?
A71070	and am I become an Idolater too, who was never apt to think my self enclined so much as to superstition?
A71070	and how can they allow any thing to be amiss, who believe they can never be deceived?
A71070	and one of those which doth imprint an indelible character?
A71070	and that the Homilies contained a wholesome and Godly Doctrine, which in their consciences they believed to be false and pernicious?
A71070	and thereby commands us to think worthily of him, and when we pray to him, to consider him only as an Infinite Being in his Nature and Attributes?
A71070	and to which of the Guides of the Church a man owed his internal assent, and external obedience?
A71070	and what should be the reason he should do it more now, than in the age wherein revelations were more necessary?
A71070	are you in earnest sir?
A71070	as in case of Baptism; that supposing the Ministers of it have been guilty of Heresie or Idolatry, the Sacrament loses its effect?
A71070	but what can not the controverting Wit of man do, upon second and serious thoughts?
A71070	but whether Gods authority or theirs must be obeyed?
A71070	can there be none, but what is derived from Rome?
A71070	did they submit their judgement to the Church?
A71070	do they not expresly set themselves to disprove their distinctions upon which their doctrine is founded?
A71070	do you think the Prophets had been Fanaticks, in case of no competent authority to countenance them?
A71070	doth it hence follow that he spake no where consistently, because once or twice, or perhaps as often as his neighbours, he contradicted himself?
A71070	doth that shew, that his mind was in the least changed?
A71070	doth the force of all the arguments used by me in this last Discourse fall to the ground, because I was formerly of another opinion?
A71070	doth this imply infallibility?
A71070	have I uttered any thing that tends to the reproach of God or true Religion?
A71070	have you any evidence of reason?
A71070	how then come my principles to be of so mischievous a nature above others?
A71070	how then could the Scripture end this Controversie, which did arise about the sense of Scripture?
A71070	if bad men may pervert them, may no ● good men make a good use of them?
A71070	if not, how comes it to be untrue now, because I deny it?
A71070	if not, why were they not forbidden as well to think of God as to make any Images of him?
A71070	must he believe the Pope?
A71070	must he follow the present Guides even the Pope himself?
A71070	or do you verily believe it, as you verily believe many other things, for no reason in the world?
A71070	or if he should, dare any person rely on his private judgement when it is contrary to the most received Doctrine or practice?
A71070	or rather, have you it by some vision or revelation made by some of those Saints, whose Fanaticism is exposed?
A71070	or to disobey his Parents, because they do not sit in an infallible chair?
A71070	or to slight his Master, because he is not Pope?
A71070	or what likeness will ye compare to him?
A71070	or whether God communicates revelations to no other end, but to please and gratifie some Enthusiastical tempers?
A71070	or whether persons may not be deceived in thinking they have revelations, when they are only delusions of their own Fancies or the Devil?
A71070	that forsooth there could be no lawful Councils called in his time; and why so I pray?
A71070	that must be supposed by the Puritans; and could none but they be the Authors of so witty a saying?
A71070	was it ever true because I said it?
A71070	was there not a good Authority to call them?
A71070	were Pope Agatho''s Legats there present, and could not inform the Council of their presumption in judging the Infallible See?
A71070	were their conceptions of God suitable to his incomprehensible nature?
A71070	were these countenanced by a competent authority among them?
A71070	what a back- blow is this to those of his own Church?
A71070	what actions can be so wild and extravagant but men may do, under such a pretence of immediate Revelation from God?
A71070	what are its weapons?
A71070	what bounds of order and Government can be preserved?
A71070	what had Ieremiah, Ezekiel, and the rest of them?
A71070	what then becomes of the Popes infallibility?
A71070	what will not these men dare to say?
A71070	what would the consequence of this be to the thing it self?
A71070	whether Christ hath appointed such Judges in all Ages, who are to determine all emergent Controversies about the difficult places of his Law?
A71070	whether praying by a prescribed form of words be as contrary to Scripture, as praying in an unknown tongue?
A71070	why should we and they of the Church of Rome quarrel thus long?
A71070	would this make those faults ever the less, because he judged so charitably of the person notwithstanding his committing them?
A71070	〈 ◊ 〉 there no danger by Empericks a ● ● Mountebanks, unless the whole Co ● ledge of Physicians approve them?
A61540	16, 29?
A61540	21?
A61540	26. and whether they could think the Gods of Aegypt had wrought all the Miracles for them in their deliverance and after it?
A61540	28?
A61540	3. sayes expresly, that he brought an offering to the Lord?
A61540	31.?
A61540	8. and to convince them the more of their evil doings: offer it now, sayes he, to thy Governour, will he be pleased with thee, or accept thy person?
A61540	All that I can believe then present is the body of Christ; and what then?
A61540	And are these things so hard to be understood, that the people ought not to be made acquainted with them in their own language?
A61540	And do not Protestants make contrition alone, which is less, sufficient for salvation?
A61540	And doth this doctrine now differ from that of the Fanatick Sectaries which have swarmed in England?
A61540	And if it were possible to get it out of such a mans hands, whether it were not the highest prudence, and care of the publick safety to do it?
A61540	And if praying in an unknown tongue doth so, I wonder he tells us, that all Catholicks are taught to say them in their Mother- tongue: Why so I pray?
A61540	And if this were all intended, why is it not so expressed if they meant honestly?
A61540	And is his body present any other way than as it is agreeable to the end of the institution?
A61540	And is it not a hard case now, we should be so often told of Fanaticism among us, by the members of the Roman Church?
A61540	And is it possible to imagine a doctrine that more effectually overthrows the necessity of a good life, than this doth?
A61540	And is not now the Popes authority an excellent remedy for all divisions in the Church?
A61540	And is there no danger among Christians that they should entertain too low and unworthy thoughts of God?
A61540	And was not the Church like to enjoy much happiness and peace under a Government founded in Rebellion and maintained by blood?
A61540	And what can this have respect to but the Elements?
A61540	And what officer is there so fit to take all Escheats and Forfeitures of Power as Christs own Vicar upon Earth?
A61540	And who dares question the infallibility of the Popes eye- sight?
A61540	And will not the same arguments more hold for publick prayer, wherein all the Congregation are to joyn together?
A61540	Are not we infinitely obliged to a man that uses so much subtlety to defend our Church from errrour in faith?
A61540	Are their prayers like counterfeit Iewels, that the less they understand them, the better they like them?
A61540	But I only renew my demand, why must no controversies among Catholicks be ended in the Council?
A61540	But after all this, can we imagine, that he should practise himself contrary to his own doctrine?
A61540	But all this while, what becomes of Purgatory?
A61540	But can he produce as good or better grounds for his own opinion?
A61540	But did the Church yet afterwards grow wiser in the sense of the Roman Church?
A61540	But doth Baronius in the least go about to explain or mitigate this?
A61540	But doth he really think, that they did not break their first faith and incurre damnation by Fornication as well as by Marrying?
A61540	But had not the Church yet experience enough of the mischief of permitting the Scriptures to the people?
A61540	But how comes our case to be so much worse under Christianity?
A61540	But how doth Mr. Cressy answer it?
A61540	But however their opinion tends more to devotion?
A61540	But if St. Austins Judgement were to be followed in this?
A61540	But if all were agreed, what need any means of agreement by one universal Head?
A61540	But if it suppose them only disputable before, then why may not the Church interpose her Iudgement, and put them out of dispute?
A61540	But it would seem somewhat hard to a voluptuous man however to be put to severe pennances; is there no remedy in this case?
A61540	But now who could imagine a thing so often revealed, so publickly allowed, so many times attested from Heaven, should not be generally received?
A61540	But supposing all languages equally known to him we make our addresses to, why should not the people use that, which they understand themselves?
A61540	But supposing this way were intelligible and practicable which it is not; yet what would the effect of it be but the highest Enthusiasm?
A61540	But these were the fittest terms to let the people know they should have as much for their money as was to be had, and what could they desire more?
A61540	But this is as true as the other; for are they agreed in matters of faith who charge one another with heresie?
A61540	But we would know, whether that God whom we serve, hath given us any rules for his worship or no?
A61540	But what becomes of the Court of Rome all this while?
A61540	But what becomes then of the Unity of the Roman Church, in the great number of Schisms, and some of long continuance among them?
A61540	But what doth he mean by these motives and grounds to believe?
A61540	But what if Catholicks should be mistaken in their belief?
A61540	But what is that to the business?
A61540	But what is to be said to the Council of Trent, which pronounces an Anathema to those who say, that Prayers are to be said only in a known Tongue?
A61540	But what is to be said, for Women who do not think themselves bound to go to School to learn Latin?
A61540	But what then?
A61540	But whence I pray must the people take the sense of such prayers as these are, if not from the signification of the words?
A61540	But where is there the least intimation given that we are to Worship Christ in the Elements, supposing him present there?
A61540	But why are we not all of a mind?
A61540	Can any be so senseless to think, that by this civil adoration, he meant, we honoured every man we met as our Soveraign Prince?
A61540	Can any one think that is not more waxing wanton against Christ, than meer marrying is?
A61540	Can the Church be too liberal in those things which tend to so good an end?
A61540	Can we imagine, saith he, that S. Peter would allow the worship of Images, who forbad Cornelius to worship him?
A61540	Did ever H. N. Iacob Behmen, or the highest Enthusiasts talk at a more extravagant rate than this Iuliana doth?
A61540	Did not he absolve the people from their allegiance?
A61540	Did not they fall into Sects and divers opinions by misunderstanding the Law?
A61540	Did the Heathen use solemn Ceremonies of making any capable of divine worship?
A61540	Did they set up their Images in publick places of worship and there kneel before them and invocate those represented by them?
A61540	Did we never discard any of the Roman opinions or practices upon the account of Revelations made to Women or to any private persons?
A61540	Do they believe, we never look into their Breviaries, Rosaries, Houres, and other Books of Devotion, wherein to this day such Prayers are to be found?
A61540	Do they not expresly deny the giving Gods Worship to any Creature?
A61540	Do they say the Scripture can be no means of Vnity, because of the various senses which have been put upon it?
A61540	Do we collect Fanatical Revelations, and set them out with comments upon them, as Gonsalvus Durantus hath done those of St. Bridgitt?
A61540	Do we resolve the grounds of any doctrine of ours into any Visions and Extasies?
A61540	Doth God impose upon our senses at that time?
A61540	Doth he imagine that Henry 8. is owned by us to be Head of our Church as the Pope is with them, so as to think him infallible?
A61540	Doth he suspect the Head of his Church may cheat and abuse him?
A61540	Doth he think they did not understand their own Mother Tongues?
A61540	Doth that man take Christs counsel of chastity, that rather chooses to commit Fornication than marry?
A61540	Every one must use his own judgement and reason in the choice of the Church he is to rely upon; is he certain in this or not?
A61540	For I pray, were they the common people who first broached Heresies in the Christian Church?
A61540	For if I do it to God absolutely and for himself, and to the Image only improperly and relatively, wherein I am to blame?
A61540	For if there were any thing but fraud and imposture in them, why may not a prudent Christian trust a Church which he believes infallible?
A61540	For if this were not it, what makes them to be more jealous of the use of the Scriptures, than ever the Christians were in former Ages?
A61540	For was not his excommunicating Henry the cause of the first defection from him?
A61540	For were the people less ignorant and heady, less presumptuous and opinionative then, than they are now?
A61540	For what was that, which was instituted by our Lord as a Sacrament?
A61540	For who knows not to what end the revelation of S. Gregoryes delivering the soul of Trajan by his prayers, is so frequently urged?
A61540	God did use the Apostles as instruments on earth to promote the salvation of mankind, but may we therefore pray to them now in Heaven to save us?
A61540	Hath it not been told you from the beginning?
A61540	Have not their Breviaries been often reviewed, if this had not been their meaning, why have they not been expunged all this while?
A61540	Have we any mother Iuliana''s among us?
A61540	Have ye not heard?
A61540	Have ye not understood from the foundation of the earth?
A61540	How came this Treasure of the Church into the Popes Keeping?
A61540	How come the Saints to make such large satisfactions to the justice of God, if the satisfaction of Christ were of so infinite a nature?
A61540	How could then the Pope have no hand in it?
A61540	How easie is it for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of God?
A61540	How often have visions and apparitions of souls been made use of to prove the doctrine of Purgatory?
A61540	How punishment doth become due, when the fault is remitted?
A61540	How so?
A61540	I could not but enquire of them, what they meant by praying?
A61540	I desire therefore seriously to know of him, whether any Worship doth at all belong to the image or no?
A61540	I desire to know whether these men who worshipped Images upon those grounds did amiss or no in it?
A61540	I mean, why might not the Image of King Henry the second have the same reverence shewn to it, that the Shrine of Thomas Becket had?
A61540	I pray Madam, ask him, whether he really thinks, they would have done none of those things, if they had said their prayers in English?
A61540	I pray what need a person be afraid of, that lives a very bad life, according to these principles?
A61540	I remember what Church I am of, and how much I am bid to beware of thee: but how then shall I be satisfied?
A61540	I would fain understand what the sacrificing to one for the honour of another means?
A61540	I would fain understand why the one should not be as free from Idolatry as the other?
A61540	If any one ask them, Whether it be lawful to kill their Soveraign?
A61540	If it be enough for the people to be present, and to pray their own private prayers there in publick, to what End is there any publick Liturgy at all?
A61540	If it be from Canonical Penance whether a man is wholly freed from the obligation to that or no?
A61540	If it be made by the Pope, in what way doth he make it?
A61540	If not, wherefore doth St. Paul pitch upon that, to condemn them for, which they were not at all to blame in?
A61540	If satisfaction be made to God for the temporal punishment of penitents by Indulgences; I desire to know when and by whom the payment is made to God?
A61540	If they be and do in good earnest desire to know how to please God, and to serve him; what directions will they give him?
A61540	If they did, how can this prove marriage worse than Fornication?
A61540	If this had been the meaning of the Law, why was it not more plainly expressed?
A61540	If this were all, why in all this time that these prayers have been complained of, hath not their sense been better expressed?
A61540	In this diversity of opinions what security can any man have what punishment he is to be freed from?
A61540	In this great confusion what ground of certainty have I to stand upon, whereby to secure my mind from commission of a great sin?
A61540	Is all this only praying to her to pray for us?
A61540	Is he past all hope of remedy there?
A61540	Is it all one, for a man to say, that his Staff helped him in his going, and to fall down upon his knees to pray to his Staff to help him?
A61540	Is it of so destructive a Nature, and framed for no other use than a sword is?
A61540	Is it, that so many mens lives have been destroyed under a pretence of Religion?
A61540	Is not here now a most admirable Vnity in the Roman Church?
A61540	Is not his Sermon on the Mount, wherein he delivers the rules of a Christian Life, as plain as any Chapter in Leviticus?
A61540	Is not this Law said to convert the soul, and to make wise the simple?
A61540	Is not unity desirable among them?
A61540	Is the Law of Christ so much more difficult and obscure than the Law of Moses?
A61540	It is but a meer shew to pretend only to keep the people in order,( for when are they otherwise but when cunning men have the managing of them?)
A61540	It is not, whether the person of Christ, visibly appearing to us in any place, ought to have divine honour given to him?
A61540	Iudge therefore which of these states is most convenient for Priests, whose proper office it is to attend wholly to the things of God?
A61540	Lastly, did they offer up Sacrifices in those Temples to the Honour of their lesser Deities and Heroes?
A61540	May I be sure if the Pope who is Head of the Church say it?
A61540	May not the Pope, if he thinks of it, gather another mighty Treasure of the absolute Power of God which is never used, as for making new worlds,& c?
A61540	May not we plead for the Vnity, that they have on the same grounds?
A61540	May we not truly say, that the Sun enlightens the world, but may we therefore pray to the Sun to enlighten us?
A61540	Might it not as well alter any other Institution on the same grounds?
A61540	Must I relye on the bare words of Christ, This is my body?
A61540	Must he suffer for his Original sin?
A61540	Must he suffer for his Venial sins?
A61540	Nay were there not very many who were false Apostles and great and dangerous Hereticks, presumptuous and arrogant, if ever any were?
A61540	Need he be afraid of the dreadful sentence of the day of judgement, Go ye cursed into everlasting flames?
A61540	No, not unless a General Council concur: but may I be sure, if a General Council determines it?
A61540	No, not unless he defines it: but may I be sure then?
A61540	Of the reason of that Law, from Gods infinite and invisible nature: How far that hath been acknowledged by Heathens?
A61540	Of the reason of that Law, from Gods infinite and invisible nature: How far that hath been acknowledged by Heathens?
A61540	On what account should it be unlawful to Sacrifice to Saints or Angels if it be lawful to invocate them?
A61540	Or St. John whom the Angel checked for offering to worship him, and bid him give that honour to God?
A61540	Or do they think that ordinary people, that understand not Latin or Greek, ought not to be concerned what becomes of their souls?
A61540	Or is there any danger they should know them too well?
A61540	Or whether the God they worshipped, understood only that one tongue, and so they were fain to speak to him, in his own language?
A61540	Say you so, I pray what benefit then have I, saith he, by this which you call an Indulgence?
A61540	Say you so, said the Dominican?
A61540	Shall I be discharged, or shall I not upon it?
A61540	So unhappy have the Popes been, when they have gone about to use their Authority for composing differences, among those who are in their own Church?
A61540	Suppose temporal punishment remain to be satisfied for; whether all or only some one kind?
A61540	Temples and erect Altars to them, and keep Festivals and burn Incense before them?
A61540	The Council of Trent could not but confess horrible abuses in the sale of Indulgences, yet what amendment hath there been since that time?
A61540	The authority of the Roman Church?
A61540	The charge is great, but what are the proofs?
A61540	The main question is, Whether God hath forbidden the worshipping of himself by an Image, under the notion of Idolatry?
A61540	The main question is, Whether God hath forbidden the worshipping of himself by an Image, under the notion of Idolatry?
A61540	The workman melteth a graven Image, and the Goldsmith spreadeth it over with Gold,& c. Have ye not known?
A61540	To this the good Nicene Fathers, not knowing what to answer, plainly deny the conclusion, and cry, They Nestorians?
A61540	To what end, say the people then, were they given, if they may not be seen?
A61540	To what purpose is that authority, that dare not be exercised when there is most need of it?
A61540	To whom will ye liken God?
A61540	WE come to consider whether the reading the Scriptures be the cause of all the Sects and Fanaticisms which have been in England?
A61540	Was ever the Law of Moses more perverted by false interpretations than in our Saviours time by the Scribes and Pharisees?
A61540	Was it inconsistent with Gods nature then, and is it less so now, when we understand his nature much better?
A61540	Was it not the delight, exercise, and continual Meditation of those who were truly devout among them?
A61540	Was not the people of Israel as refractory and disobedient as any have been since?
A61540	Was not there the same danger of mistaking their sense at that time?
A61540	Was not this Law given them as a rule to direct themselves by?
A61540	Was the Controversie about the Popes temporal power confined to the Schools?
A61540	Was there not much more danger of misunderstanding the Doctrine of the Gospel at first than ever after?
A61540	Was this now all the quarrel the Christians had with the Heathens that they worshipped Iupiter and Venus and Vulcan?
A61540	Were Arius, Nestorius, Macedonius, Eutyches, or the great abettors of their Doctrines, any of the Vulgar?
A61540	Were not all sent to this to learn to govern their actions?
A61540	Were not here Controversies fit to be determined?
A61540	Were not his Legats present at all the proceedings and approved them?
A61540	Were not these goodly heads of the Church the mean time?
A61540	Were they all members united under one Head, when there were sometimes two, sometimes three several Heads?
A61540	Were they not as apt to quarrel with divine Laws and the authority God had set up among them?
A61540	What a case am I in then, if those words do not prove it?
A61540	What admirable chastity is that?
A61540	What can such an Image do to the heightening of devotion, or raising affections?
A61540	What could be more said to Almighty God or his Son Iesus Christ?
A61540	What customers doth he hope to find at such sordid rates?
A61540	What effects of Fanaticism have we seen in England so dreadful which may not be paralled with examples, or justified by the principles of that party?
A61540	What horrible blasphemy is this, which is so solemnly approved in the Church of Rome for divine Revelations?
A61540	What is more necessary to the life of man than eating and drinking; yet where lyes intemperance and the danger of surfetting, but in the use of these?
A61540	What is somenting and encouraging Rebellion in the highest degree if this be not?
A61540	What is to be done now?
A61540	What keeps men more in their wits than sleeping, yet when are men so lyable to have their throats cut as in the use of that?
A61540	What more pleasant to the eyes than to see the Sun, yet what is there so like to put them out as to stare too long upon him?
A61540	What need any talk of the Churches Treasure for this?
A61540	What need we make Negative Articles of faith, where the Affirmative do necessarily imply them?
A61540	What then signifie the boasts of Vnity in the Roman Church, if they can not prevent the falling of their members into such dangerous Schisms?
A61540	What then?
A61540	What would St. Paul have said to such men that should have asked such things of him, who yet saith, that he was an instrument of saving some?
A61540	What, did the Apostles never imagine all this while the ill use that might be made of them by men of perverse minds?
A61540	What, saith he, did not the Prophets and Apostles receive truth from Heaven by Revelations?
A61540	Where are the Visions and Revelations ever pleaded by us in any matter of Doctrine?
A61540	Whether all the satisfaction of Christ taken together were not great enough to remit the eternal punishment of the whole world?
A61540	Whether confirmation might be given without Bishops?
A61540	Whether it was by divine right or no?
A61540	Whether our opinion concerning the reading and interpreting Scripture, doth hinder it from being a most certain rule of faith and life?
A61540	Whether praying in a known or unknown tongue, do more conduce to devotion?
A61540	Whether that prudential dispensing the Scriptures as he calls it, be any hinderance to devotion or no?
A61540	Whether that prudential dispensing the Scriptures used in the Church of Rome, doth hinder devotion or no?
A61540	Whether that religious worship they gave to Images was not part of that adoration which was only due to God?
A61540	Whether the Episcopal Order was more perfect than the Monastical?
A61540	Whether the Regulars were under the jurisdiction of Bishops?
A61540	Whether the Vnity of that Church be so admirable to tempt all persons, who prize the Churches Vnity, to return to it?
A61540	Whether the disparity between the Heathen worship and theirs be so great as to excuse them from Idolatry?
A61540	Whether the reading of the Scriptures be the cause of the numbers of Sects and Fanaticisms which have been in England?
A61540	Whether there be a necessity of being a member of some distinct Church?
A61540	Whether there be no danger of Fanaticism in the Roman Church?
A61540	Whether they appeared not long before on Mount Sinai, and delivered the Law to them?
A61540	Whether this whole matter be a thing left in the power of the Church to determine?
A61540	Why doth not he then take some other care for his own Law to prevent this for the future, if that had been judged by him the proper way of cure?
A61540	Why in so short a comprehension of Laws, is this Law so much inlarged above what it might have been, if all that he saith, were only meant by it?
A61540	Why might not they worship the Statues of Kings and Princes, as well as others do those of Rebels and Traytors?
A61540	Why should not all of them be at their private prayers together?
A61540	Why should the Priest with his Iargon of hard words interrupt them?
A61540	Why were none of the words elsewhere used, by way of contempt of the Heathen Idols here mentioned, as being less lyable to ambiguity?
A61540	Would any man have argued like St. Augustin that should talk at this rate?
A61540	Yet still we are to seek what is to be done, when two Revelations contradict each other?
A61540	Yet suppose I were sure he was a Priest, what assurance have I, that he had an intention to consecrate that very Wafer which I am to adore?
A61540	and did not they keep the Church in great Vnity under their agreeable conduct?
A61540	and do they not as plainly affirm that men do it when they invocate their fellow servants to be intercessors with God for them?
A61540	and do they think the Massacre at Paris and the Rebellion in Ireland can ever be forgotten by us?
A61540	and have they no wayes to evade the Popes definitions?
A61540	and how can his word be taken for the remitting of a debt, when they take as much care of payment as if he had said nothing?
A61540	and if there be no punishment retained when God forgives, what hath the Pope ● to do to release?
A61540	and if they did make satisfactions, were they not sufficiently rewarded for them?
A61540	and that it is no less a guilt of Idolatry in this case, than it is in giving the Honour due to a Prince to any of his Servants?
A61540	and was it ever more properly so than in dying?
A61540	and was that done by not understanding it?
A61540	and what a beastly institution must marriage be, if Fornication be a less crime than that?
A61540	and when could there be greater need than in such a time when the Church was in a flame by these contentions?
A61540	and wherein can we better express that to God, than in offering up our prayers to him?
A61540	and who hath the keeping of it, and what use is made of so much more useful a treasure than that which serves only to remit the temporal punishment?
A61540	and why doth the Council of Trent determine that due worship is to be given them?
A61540	are there not factions of long continuance among them upon these differences?
A61540	as whether the Worshipping false Gods, supposing them to be true, be not as venial a fault, as Worshipping that for the true God which is not so?
A61540	but if then it could be applyed to a higher end, without any other help, why not where it is to have far less efficacy?
A61540	could they be better decided any where else?
A61540	did not that make for several Ages as great disturbances in the Church, as were ever known in it upon any quarrel of Religion?
A61540	do they not differ from one another?
A61540	do they not write, and Preach, and rail against each other as much as any Sectaries can do?
A61540	do we terminate our Worship upon his humane nature?
A61540	doth he take out so much ready cash of the Churches treasure and pay it down upon the nail, according to the proportion of every ones sins?
A61540	doth it thence follow that this Commandment must be only against Idols?
A61540	for if they could but express any sign of contrition, by the motion of an Eye or a Finger, all were well enough?
A61540	have we any Festivals kept upon such occasions?
A61540	how am I freed now, not only from the fears of Hell and Purgatory, but from crabbed and hateful penances?
A61540	i. e. why I may not as well honour God by giving worship to the Sun, as to Ignatius Loyola, or St. Francis, or any other late Canonized Saint?
A61540	if I shall, what do you tell me of that which I am discharged from?
A61540	if he be not free, what is it he is freed from?
A61540	if he be, what power hath the Priest to enjoyne penance after?
A61540	if he doth, what becomes of infallibility?
A61540	if he verily believes that the Pope can not erre and will not deceive, why must not his word be taken?
A61540	if it be, why have they not obtained it, since they can so easily doe it?
A61540	if it were, whether all the redundant parts of that, be cast into a treasure too?
A61540	if none at all, to what end are they kneeled before, and kissed, which if the Images had any sense in them, would think was done to them?
A61540	if not, how can a man be said to be freed from the temporal punishment of sin that is as lyable to it as any one else?
A61540	if not, why doe they boast of it?
A61540	if there be any due, whether it be the same then is given to the Prototype, or distinct from it?
A61540	if there be, how one part comes to be applyed and the other cast into a treasure?
A61540	if they were, how come those satisfactions to help others which they were so abundantly recompensed for themselves?
A61540	is it not the death of Christ that is set forth in the Eucharist?
A61540	is that the object of our adoration?
A61540	may he not by the help of this deliver souls out of hell, as well as by the other out of Purgatory?
A61540	may not one be relative and transient as well as the other?
A61540	or doth he only tell God where such a treasure lyes and bid him go and satisfie himself, for as much as he discharges of his d ● bt?
A61540	or lastly, I would appeal to themselves whether the precept against Worshipping the host of Heaven, or images were more plain in the Scripture?
A61540	or must we not believe them in other things, because in the particular case of the Eucharist we must believe God, rather than our sences?
A61540	or rather doth it not yield a greater possibility of salvation to one than to the other?
A61540	or was it, that they were all so much of a mind that they had nothing to doe, but to condemn their enemies?
A61540	or was the force of it spent then, that it needs a fresh supply afterwards?
A61540	or what can that universal Head signifie to making Vnity, when his title to his Headship becomes a cause of greater divisions?
A61540	or what likeness will ye compare unto him?
A61540	since the Question was, which of them was the Head of the Church with whom the members were to be united?
A61540	that prayers in an unknown tongue are contrary to the Edification of the Church?
A61540	that the Scripture was written in a known tongue?
A61540	the exercise of the graces and duties I mentioned?
A61540	then he plainly deceives us; is it by telling us we ought to believe more than we see?
A61540	was it not the external and visible signes or elements?
A61540	what is it an Indulgence of?
A61540	what made them so extremely cautious in the Council of Trent of meddling with any thing that was in Controversie among themselves?
A61540	what parts can be made of an infinite and entire satisfaction?
A61540	where then lyes their Vnity they boast off?
A61540	whether Christ did any more than God required?
A61540	whether any thing which God required can be said to be redundant?
A61540	whether diseases, pains, and death be not part of the temporal punishment of sin, and whether men may be freed from these by Indulgences?
A61540	whether from the effects of the justice of God in extraordinary judgements?
A61540	whether the Pope might not erre in matter of fact?
A61540	whether the Propositions condemned were in Iansenius or no?
A61540	which in other terms is whether the Church did cheat or not in giving them?
A61540	who gave him alone the Keys of it?
A61540	why is it not said only of the temporal punishment due to sin, the fault being supposed to be remitted?
A61540	would it then follow, that they were Idolaters?
A61627	( supposing the stories true, which I hardly believe) hath he ever said any such thing?
A61627	7. declared all Ordinations to be Null which were made by Excommunicated Bishops?
A61627	According to Minucius his account of the Image- God; Quando igitur hic nascitur?
A61627	Against what Church?
A61627	Among the Grecian Colonies, what wonder is it, if the Grecian Jupiter was worshipped?
A61627	And after all, is not this Credible?
A61627	And all the other Instances waved to come to this of Bowing to the Altar?
A61627	And are not Lugo''s words plain and full to this purpose?
A61627	And are you willing to part with your whole right and interest in him?
A61627	And at the same time he condemns the worship both of Saints and Angels; in the places produced by Dr. St. What answer hath T. G. made to this?
A61627	And did Dr. St. ever deny that the Church of Rome opposed some things clearly revealed in Scripture?
A61627	And did ever any Divine of the Church of England say otherwise?
A61627	And do not they make an Idol of the Common Prayer?
A61627	And do you think all this is not applying the notion of Idolatry home to the Roman Church?
A61627	And doth T. G. in earnest think this doth not prove they had lawful Authority?
A61627	And doth not Dr. St. say the very same thing?
A61627	And doth not Latria take in any peculiar act of Divine Worship?
A61627	And doth not all this amount to true and real worship?
A61627	And doth not he say expresly, that he doth not speak of these, but of the former?
A61627	And doth not that imply an esteem of proper divine excellency, and is not that proper to God alone and uncreated?
A61627	And doth not this fully prove what Dr. St. brought this Testimony for?
A61627	And for what end?
A61627	And have not you bravely proved that Dr. St. hath herein gone against the sense of the genuine Sons of the Church of England?
A61627	And how after all, hath T. G. proved it?
A61627	And if so, is it not to give the worship due to God to something else, to apply those acts which are peculiar to himself, to any thing besides him?
A61627	And if they have none themselves, can they give it to others?
A61627	And is all this, do you think, answered by T. G.''s repeating what he had said before; or blown down by a puff or two of Wit?
A61627	And is it not the same case here?
A61627	And is not God a true object of worship?
A61627	And is not prayer a part of Gods immediate Worship?
A61627	And is not the giving divine worship to a creature Idolatry?
A61627	And is not the very same distinction used by Bishop Andrews, Bishop Sanderson, and the most zealous defenders of the Rites of our Church?
A61627	And is not the very same practised in your Church?
A61627	And is not this making the Image Superiour?
A61627	And is there no difference between the Acts of these two men as to Images themselves?
A61627	And is this dwindling expression fit for a Christian, to say only, falluntur in nomine, they are deceived in the name?
A61627	And is this indeed the present you make to Almighty God in honour of his Saints?
A61627	And is this making Negative Articles of Faith; about which T. G. and E. W. and others, have made such senseless clamours?
A61627	And is this nothing to the answering T. G.''s arguments?
A61627	And judge you now, whether Dr. St. took leave of his Text, whether he did not speak to Idolatry in the Nature of the thing?
A61627	And now I pray tell me, what reason hath there been for all this noise about Moral Certainty?
A61627	And now I pray was it possible for T. G. to overlook all these things?
A61627	And suppose a man doth that Act which your Church allows not, is he guilty of Idolatry or bare disobedience in doing it to an Image?
A61627	And this being the true state of it, I pray, where lies the force of the argument?
A61627	And was he a favourer of Dissenters, and an underminer of the Church of England?
A61627	And was it not neatly done of the Doctor to wrap up all this in those short words, The Devil perswaded men to return to the worship of the Creature?
A61627	And were it not a horrible profanation to appoint such a Supper as that of our Lord is, in commemoration of of S. Francis, or Ignatius Loyola?
A61627	And what account doth T. G. give of it?
A61627	And what answer doth T. G. give to them?
A61627	And what can we beg for more from God himself?
A61627	And what could have been more material to his purpose than this, if it could have been done?
A61627	And what doth Tertullian say to take off these testimonies?
A61627	And what helps more proper to understand these, than the Doctrine of your most learned Divines?
A61627	And what is that which is Sacrificed in the Mass?
A61627	And what now hath T. G. gained by this observation?
A61627	And what reason have we to run to School- Divines for the sense of matters of daily practice, as the worship of Images was before the Reformation?
A61627	And what saith T. G. I pray to this?
A61627	And what saith T. G. to that?
A61627	And what then?
A61627	And what think you now of Mr. Thorndike?
A61627	And when Dr. St. saith, we ought not to charge the Heathens with more than they were guilty of; doth T. G. think we ought?
A61627	And when they made use of the most proper Epithets of Good and Great to describe and worship him by; is it probable they should not understand him?
A61627	And where are there any such Idolaters to be found in the world?
A61627	And who proves this from the Testimony of the Heathen Poets and Philosophers, and that with the very name of Jupiter too?
A61627	And whoever expected they should confess themselves guilty?
A61627	And why did not T. G. answer to this, which was the most material point of all others?
A61627	And why in such a place, where he pretends only to give an account of Dr. St.''s vain and endless Discourses, doth he bring in this at large?
A61627	And why may not Idolatry prevail where Luciferian Pride, and Hellish Cruelty, and desperate Wickedness have long since prevailed?
A61627	And will not the same plea hold for us who declare we do not give Soveraign Worship to any Creatures, but only inferiour Worship?
A61627	And will you make us worship it, whether we will or no?
A61627	Are not his circumstances more considerable in the Church of England than ever he can hope they should be, if it were destroyed?
A61627	Are not these arguments drawn from the nature of the thing, and not meerly from a positive Law?
A61627	Are these all which Dr. St. mentioned?
A61627	Are they not deceived in much more than the name, in the very thing it self?
A61627	Are we unconcerned in the Laws God made for his worship?
A61627	Are you the High- Priests of the Gospel to offer unto God the great Sacrifice of Atonement?
A61627	Are you the only Christians in the world?
A61627	As the man brought in Hercules into his Sermon by Head and Shoulders?
A61627	At the elevation of the Host, at the carrying it about, at the exposing of it on the Altar, you worship that which was consecrated do you not?
A61627	Because the Law was delivered by them?
A61627	Besides, I would fain know of these Gentlemen, whether their improper and relative Latria, be Latria or Inferiour worship?
A61627	Besides, Is not the Power of giving Orders a part of that lawful Authority which belongs to Bishops?
A61627	But I have not yet found any cause for these clamours; and I suppose there may be as little as to this Testimony: I pray tell me where lyes it?
A61627	But I pray let me understand how far and in what sense?
A61627	But I pray on what occasion was this passage brought in?
A61627	But Vasquez asks an untoward Question, suppose such a man be reduced to one place, whether shall he be saved or damned?
A61627	But can there be no Object of worship but what is visible?
A61627	But did not T. G. blame the Philosophers for an exteriour profession of Idolatry?
A61627	But did not the Heathens require Divine Worship to be given to Deified- men?
A61627	But do you observe the difference he puts between that and Worship?
A61627	But do you think in earnest, that it is in the power of men to alter the Laws of God?
A61627	But do you think, it is a good answer to an Indictment, to say it consisted of too many lines?
A61627	But doth T. G. think that they gave the Titles and Epithets of Omnipotent, Omniscient,& c. to the Devil?
A61627	But doth he ever so much as intimate that Jupiter of Creet was not a false God?
A61627	But doth not this imply, that there was no other Civil Society in the world, wherein a man could preserve himself, but the Roman Common- wealth?
A61627	But doth the Church of England challenge any such Infallibility to her self?
A61627	But have not you seen, what T. G. hath said to all that, and how he hath shewed that his Witnesses were incompetent?
A61627	But how I pray?
A61627	But how comes it in?
A61627	But how doth T. G. take off the charge of Idolatry in this Rubrick?
A61627	But how doth this prove they did not intend to worship the true God there?
A61627	But how subtilly had T. G. altered the whole force of the argument?
A61627	But is it possible for T. G. not to apprehend the difference of these things?
A61627	But is not this an admirable way of reasoning, from the Heathens objections against the Christians?
A61627	But must T. G.''s quibble destroy all Dr. St.''s credit?
A61627	But tell me now, whether common people are not in danger of any of these things, as much at least as of resting in the Creatures?
A61627	But that you may take no advantage by his sayings; how can it be Idolatry without an Object?
A61627	But the Question still remains, whether notwithstanding all this, the Heathens did not design to worship the supreme God under the name of Jove?
A61627	But the first question in a fray is, how fell they out?
A61627	But what answer doth T. G. give to this, which is so material a Testimony, and so destructive to all he saith, upon this matter?
A61627	But what do you mean by the offering up of God to God, do you think the Divinity was the Sacrifice?
A61627	But what doth T. G. mean by repeating such stuff as this?
A61627	But what if there be no ground for all this?
A61627	But what is all this to the proving that inferiour worship is not Idolatry?
A61627	But what is it then should make him act so much against his interest?
A61627	But what is this, to the sense of the Church of England?
A61627	But what method doth T. G. take in this matter?
A61627	But what place could be fitter for this Heresie, than the Sedes Stercoraria?
A61627	But what saith T. G. to those whom he yields not to have been Puritanically inclined, and yet charged the Church of Rome with Idolatry?
A61627	But what say you to T. G.''s proofs?
A61627	But what then?
A61627	But when men attribute such divine effects, as miraculous cures to Images, what can they believe but there is some Divinity either in or about them?
A61627	But who ever reckoned the Commandments among the Articles of Faith?
A61627	But why so unnecessary to answer an argument of that consequence?
A61627	But why worse than Egyptian Idolatry, I beseech you?
A61627	But will T. G. say, that none of these are clear, because men are put to pains and several wayes to prove them?
A61627	But will any man say the true notion of Adultery is a doctrinal point of Faith?
A61627	Can any thing be said plainer for Conformity, than this is by the Author of the Irenicum?
A61627	Can any words be plainer than these?
A61627	Can no one charge the Papists with Idolatry, but by vertue of this principle?
A61627	Can the Catholick Cause be maintained by no other Arts than these?
A61627	Can you, with any face say, there is not so much danger in the worship of Images, as in the worship of the Creatures?
A61627	Did Dr. St. meddle with the School- Divines any otherwise than as they explained the sense of Councils, or the practice of the Church?
A61627	Did St. Paul mean the Devil when he said, whom you ignorantly worship, him I declare unto you?
A61627	Did he ever say that the Church of Rome did not erre against the doctrine of the second commandment?
A61627	Did he in good earnest go abroad to preach the Devil to the world?
A61627	Did he, or did he not?
A61627	Did not K. James understand what he said, and what they did?
A61627	Did not the Heathens believe that to be God which they worshipped?
A61627	Did so many Popes know no better this distinction between the Validity of Ordination, and the Power of Jurisdiction?
A61627	Did these Testimonies prove this, or did they not?
A61627	Did they believe Christ incorporated in that Image too?
A61627	Did we then think, the good old Cause would ever have ended thus?
A61627	Do not Booksellers look on Books as their own, and do what they please with them, without the Authors consent or approbation?
A61627	Do not we see the Papists, who were thought the greatest enemies to toleration in the world, now plead most vehemently for it?
A61627	Do not you know the Christian Church hath been broken into different Communions ever since the four General Councils, and continues so to this day?
A61627	Do not you understand it now?
A61627	Do not your own Writers confess, that in some cases an Image may become an Idol, by having Divine Worship given to it?
A61627	Do they not set up an Vsurper instead of God, and his most inveterate enemy, and attribute infinite and undivided power to him?
A61627	Do you deny this power to be given in your Orders?
A61627	Do you indeed in this sense make a Present of the Son of God to the Father?
A61627	Do you mean all of them so absolutely appropriated to God, that it is not lawful upon any account to give them to any other?
A61627	Do you observe the several Mole- hills which he hath cast up; and is not that a sign he works un- derground?
A61627	Do you think the Laconian in Boccalini would have made such a noise for missing a page or two in Guicciardins War of Pisa?
A61627	Doth Athenagoras yield this to be a good proof concerning one true God, and yet deny the true God to be meant by Jupiter?
A61627	Doth T. G. call these Capriches?
A61627	Doth T. G. name any more than Origen to prove that Jupiter according to the Fathers was an Arch- devil?
A61627	Doth T. G. talk at this rate; and hope to excuse the Church of Rome from Idolatry?
A61627	Doth T. G. upon so long consideration of this matter name any?
A61627	Doth he not mention their doctrine, and their distinctions?
A61627	Doth it lye in the consecration of the Elements which are visible?
A61627	Doth it lye in the mimical gestures of the Priest at the Altar in imitation of Christ on the Cross?
A61627	Doth it not hence follow, that the God whom the Gentiles knew, was the same whom the Christians worshipped?
A61627	Doth not God himself tell the Jews they were far from him, when they seemed most to draw nigh unto him?
A61627	Doth not T. G. appeal to the Articles of the Church of England for the most authentick declaration of her sense?
A61627	Doth not this excuse the Gnosticks worship of the Image of Christ, as well as yours?
A61627	Doth this prove either Dr. St.''s ignorance, or tergiversation?
A61627	Either the Christians were right in condemning such Worship for Idolatry, or not?
A61627	F. C. And what then?
A61627	F. C. But you use the same postures which the Papists do, and yet you charge them with Idolatry?
A61627	F. C. Call you this rambling?
A61627	F. C. What do I care for your Church or her Rubricks?
A61627	F. C. What is it you would have by all these Questions?
A61627	F. C. What is that?
A61627	F. C. What matter is it, what you say or deny?
A61627	F. C. Who doubts of that?
A61627	F. C. Who is this Patronus bonae Fidei, you speak so much of?
A61627	F. C. Why, have I not told you already?
A61627	F. C. You would fain draw me in to dispute again, would you?
A61627	For I pray tell me wherein lies the difference between Soveraign Worship, and Inferiour: In Acts of the Mind, or in External Acts?
A61627	For I still ask, what it was, which made their Worship of Angels Idolatry?
A61627	For are not absolute and relative worship two distinct kinds?
A61627	For are not those Atheists who acknowledge no other God but meer matter; i. e. no God at all?
A61627	For can any words be more express than those, in the Introduction?
A61627	For dare any of you say so of the Church of Rome in respect of Images?
A61627	For do we take our Images for Gods?
A61627	For do you think it is possible to give the worship proper to God to an Image, or not?
A61627	For doth he think our Bishops and Clergy were not careful that their true sense were set forth in the Latin Articles?
A61627	For how came you to make a Present to God of his own Son?
A61627	For if the Bishops were never so much inclined to it, how could they possibly give ease to you without destroying themselves?
A61627	For is the Image or Cross worshipped, or not?
A61627	For what are all their bowings, and kneelings, and crossings, but vain imaginations?
A61627	For what consent could there be between God and the Devil?
A61627	For what could the Army mean else, by that acclamation, Deo Deorum& qui solus potens?
A61627	For what kind of God, saith he, was that which had neither sense nor reason?
A61627	For who can tell what secret Idolaters or Hereticks there might be among those Bishops from whom that Authority is derived?
A61627	For why may not I worship God in any creature as well as by an Image?
A61627	For, I pray, how comes it to be Idolatry in them who give only an inferiour and relative worship, if that worship be not Idolatry?
A61627	For, do we believe, that the Jews made an ordinary man to be the Eternal Son of God by speaking five words over him?
A61627	For, either they did believe some other God or not?
A61627	For, if no man can give that which he hath not; how can those give power and Authority who have none?
A61627	For, would any man say this, that thought it could ever be proved to be against the sense of the Church of England?
A61627	God in general forbids Murder, Theft and Adultery; but are not those prohibited acts to be judged by the circumstances?
A61627	Gods or the Devils?
A61627	Had he not better look more about him, before he makes such rude and impertinent clamours about Dr. St.''s insincerity in quoting Authors?
A61627	Had he then any suspicion of his being Puritanically inclined?
A61627	Hath he brought him under an Index Expurgatorius?
A61627	Hath he done it in all the quotations out of him, or only in one?
A61627	Hath he ever Preached or Written any Doctrine since, contrary to the sense of the Church of England?
A61627	Hath he falsified his words and corrupted the Text?
A61627	Hath he made any party or faction to the disturbance of the Peace of the Church?
A61627	Hath he not conformed to its Rules, observed its Offices, obeyed his Superiours, and been ready to defend its Cause against Adversaries of all sorts?
A61627	Hath not the Dr. truly cited his words?
A61627	Hath not the difference of these cases been laid open before him?
A61627	Have not the Gates of the Turk been too strong for them?
A61627	Have not you assented and consented to all that is in the Book of Common Prayer, and what will you stick at after?
A61627	Have you the power of bestowing him in your hands?
A61627	Heylin suggest any such thing?
A61627	How can this be the meaning of the Council of Laodicea, when it declares for the honouring, and celebrating the Feast- days of the Martyrs?
A61627	How could our Church do less than she did in this matter, if she would declare her sense to the World, or take care of her own security?
A61627	How could the Christians plead the consent of the Wiser Heathens with them, if they owned a Devil instead of the true God?
A61627	How could this be, if their supreme God whom they worshipped were only an Arch- devil?
A61627	How doth T. G. make that out?
A61627	How else can the giving it to a Creature make it Idolatry?
A61627	How far Gods appropriating these Acts doth concern us?
A61627	How far the Gentiles could be charged with Idolatry, who worshipped the parts of the world with respect to God as the soul of it?
A61627	How go the prices of Books here?
A61627	How is that possible on T. G.''s principles, when they were only Gods Ministers therein?
A61627	How many Cords are necessary to tye these two together?
A61627	How many before the dayes of the Schoolmen were of opinion that the censures of the Church did take away the power of Orders?
A61627	How much of the good Divinity of the late times might they have for the money?
A61627	How must they starve their people with the Divinity of these men?
A61627	How often must you be told, that the question is not, whether the Devils were not assisting in the practice of Idolatry?
A61627	How the applying the Acts of Religious Worship to a Creature makes that Worship Idolatry?
A61627	How then can any Christian trust his soul with that Church, which hath the Conscience to bar him of such helps provided by God?
A61627	How then can this absolute Divine Honour be given to a Created Being?
A61627	How then, saith Dr. St. comes S. Augustines Authority to be quitted for the one, and so greedily embraced for the other?
A61627	I grant he mentions Theophilus Antio ● hemis in the same page; but to what purpose?
A61627	I pray tell me was not he a man in his heart of our Church, and only lived in the external communion of yours?
A61627	I pray tell me, how long is it since you of the Church of England have maintained this charge?
A61627	I pray tell me, was there any harm in this or not?
A61627	I pray what say you to Archbishop Whitgift?
A61627	I pray, when and where?
A61627	Idolatry?
A61627	If Christ do remain whole and entire after all the Sacrificial Acts, where I say is the true and proper Sacrifice?
A61627	If Christs precept were to be understood of all kind of swearing, do you really think it would be lawful to swear at all?
A61627	If I bowed to a Friend at Church, is any man so senseless to take this for Idolatry?
A61627	If Jove meant by Aratus was no other than an Arch- devil, how doth this prove us to have our dependence on God for life and motion?
A61627	If T. G. were sent upon a Mission to them, I would fain know by what arguments he could convince any of these of Idolatry?
A61627	If actual extension may be separated from a Body, why not quantity it self?
A61627	If an Athenian had asked S. Paul, whose Off- spring doth Aratus say we are?
A61627	If he did not, Dr. St. was in the right: if he did, why did not T. G. shew it?
A61627	If it be not, why did the Council of Nice declare against it; if it be, tell me in what Acts that Worship of Latria doth consist?
A61627	If it be only a Sacramental change, what is that to a Sacrifice of propitiation?
A61627	If not, how comes a propitiatory Sacrifice without shedding of Blood?
A61627	If the blood be not really separated from the Body, where is the mactation, which must be in a propitiatory Sacrifice?
A61627	If the body of Christ doth remain whole and entire, where is the true proper Sacrifice?
A61627	If there may be Idolatry in the worship of an Image, we are then to consider, whether your worship be not Idolatry?
A61627	If they did not; why did not T. G. discover them all?
A61627	If they say, it is after the manner of a Spirit, that doth by no means salve the contradiction; for how can a body be after the manner of a Spirit?
A61627	If this were Idolatry in them, why not in you?
A61627	If two women in travail prayed for help, the one to Lucina, the other to the B. Virgin, is the first only guilty of Idolatry?
A61627	In acknowledging a Creator, but giving all the worship to the Creatures?
A61627	In what sense making God the soul of the world is setting up a false God?
A61627	In worshipping God as the soul of the world, and the several parts of it with respect to him?
A61627	In worshipping bad men instead of good?
A61627	Is all this, saith D. St. nothing but to charge them with such practices which they detest?
A61627	Is he slain again in the Mass?
A61627	Is it Idolatry or not?
A61627	Is it not as clear as the Sun, that it was to shew that the charge of Idolatry was against the sense of the Church of England?
A61627	Is it not enough for us to unswer Objections; unless we put them just in the page you would have them, after the way of Objections and Solutions?
A61627	Is it not sufficient that it be in all Acts of Religious Worship?
A61627	Is it not that we meet together and joyn in acts of Devotion to testifie our acknowledgement of Gods Soveraignty and dependence upon him?
A61627	Is it not the giving divine worship to a creature?
A61627	Is it not thus in the other Commandments?
A61627	Is it not, because Gods incommunicable excellency requires an external worship peculiar to it self?
A61627	Is it not?
A61627	Is it only for his comfort to let him see, there is one body at least in the world, more foolish and impertinent than he?
A61627	Is it possible to give divine worship to an Image of a person, without respect to the person?
A61627	Is it then Idolatry to deny external Worship to God out of Reverence to his Majesty, and to give it to inferiour Beings?
A61627	Is it to suppose that which they worship to be truly and properly God, as T. G. saith?
A61627	Is it, or is it not an Article of Faith?
A61627	Is it, or is it not?
A61627	Is not Latria the Worship proper to God?
A61627	Is not T. G. a man of admirable dexterity, and unparallel''d ingenuity?
A61627	Is not a Power to reward and punish in the Tutelar Spirits set down by Dr. St. out of Trigautius?
A61627	Is not a power to excommunicate and absolve a part of that jurisdiction which T. G. doth distinguish from the bare power of Orders?
A61627	Is not adoration a part of Worship?
A61627	Is not adoration of an Image, Idolatry?
A61627	Is not the celebration of the Eucharist an appropriate Act of Divine Worship now under the Gospel?
A61627	Is not the great High- Priest of our profession entred within the Vail, and is there making intercession by vertue of his Sacrifice on the Cross?
A61627	Is not this a rare invention?
A61627	Is not this enough to shew the difference of their Worship to any men of common sense?
A61627	Is not this home do you think?
A61627	Is not this kind of procedure more suitable to the design of Julian, than of the Reformation?
A61627	Is not this to make such a Saint a sharer in the Government of the World, as much as the Heathens did their Tutelar Gods under one Supreme?
A61627	Is that your wise question?
A61627	Is the bowing down to an Image Idolatry?
A61627	Is the man alive I pray, that we may give him our due thanks for the service he hath done us upon many occasions?
A61627	Is this account true, or false?
A61627	Is this argument good, or not?
A61627	Is this equal dealing?
A61627	Is this fair dealing?
A61627	Is this his meaning?
A61627	Is this only to shew the Witnesses Dr. St. produced to be incompetent?
A61627	Is this then the same case with a Wives kissing her Husbands Picture?
A61627	Is this true, or is it not?
A61627	Is this, saith he, the voice of Nature in the common people, or the confession of a Christian?
A61627	Is your cause to be supported only by such tricks as these?
A61627	It is a great undertaking, and becoming T. G. But how?
A61627	It is true, they do so and must do so if they would live; but what then?
A61627	Judge you now whether upon the account of such pitiful cavils, Dr. St. hath forfeited his right of being believed in his Citations?
A61627	Jupiter, Saturn, Juno, Aesculapius,& c. I pray consider, were these their Gods or not?
A61627	Just thus it is in the present case, your Church declares such Acts of Worship may be lawfully applied to Images and Saints; but what then?
A61627	Leaving out of Christ might make it Judaism or Heathenism, but how comes it to be Idolatry?
A61627	Lugo alone produced?
A61627	Lugo produced at all?
A61627	May not a Bishop or Priest remaining so, be deprived of all lawful Authority to exercise their Functions, for having faln into Heresie or Idolatry?
A61627	Must he search and examine them, one by one?
A61627	Must we impute this to a casual Vndulation of the visual rayes, as T. G. very finely expresseth it?
A61627	No one questions the former to be the sense of our Church; the only question lyes in the later, whether that be Idolatry or no?
A61627	Nothing?
A61627	Now how can it signifie the Honour due only to God, if it may signifie the honour due to his Creatures?
A61627	Now judge you whether according to this principle there can be nothing unlawful, but it must be an Idol?
A61627	Now saith T. G. those were the words of Arnobius to the Heathen; what then?
A61627	Nyssen did argue well against the Arians or not?
A61627	Or did Epiphanius believe him to be so in the Image on the Veil, or the Council of Elvira in the Pictures upon Walls?
A61627	Or doth T. G. suppose, that they did own one true God, but gave all their worship to the Devil?
A61627	Or doth it lye in the swallowing down, and consumption of the species after Consecration by the Priest?
A61627	Or hath he wilfully altered his sense and meaning?
A61627	Or is it to give divine worship to the Creatures without any respect to God the Maker of the World and of all things in it?
A61627	Or out of pure spite to Dr. St. by so often repeating the passage of his being delinitus& occaecatus?
A61627	Or rather whom do his Clients the Fanaticks worship?
A61627	Or, if not, is his opinion to be taken from a Panegyrical Oration, or a strict Dispute?
A61627	P. D And what then?
A61627	P. D. And I pray what do you observe concerning the buying of Books here?
A61627	P. D. And are not your eyes upon your Hats when you pray?
A61627	P. D. And did not the same Fathers bring infinite arguments to prove that these Gods were but men?
A61627	P. D. And do you think Images( but that they are set so high) have not more of the Nature of Stumbling- blocks in them?
A61627	P. D. And doth not Dr. St. say as much?
A61627	P. D. And doth not the argument hold?
A61627	P. D. And doth this mighty effort come to this at last?
A61627	P. D. And how I pray doth T. G. clear himself?
A61627	P. D. And is not that to the purpose?
A61627	P. D. And must this pass for an Answer to Dr. St.''s Discourse about the sense of the second Commandment?
A61627	P. D. And was not this true?
A61627	P. D. And were those who were only Deified- men, truly and properly Gods and not by way of participation?
A61627	P. D. And what answer doth T. G. give to that?
A61627	P. D. And what follows?
A61627	P. D. And what if T. G. be mistaken as to every one of these?
A61627	P. D. And what then I beseech you?
A61627	P. D. And what then I beseech you?
A61627	P. D. And what then I beseech you?
A61627	P. D. And what then, I pray?
A61627	P. D. And what then?
A61627	P. D. And what then?
A61627	P. D. And what then?
A61627	P. D. Are not these the two persons whom Dr. St. goes about to excuse for applying the Poetical Fables to Jupiter O. M.?
A61627	P. D. Are you in earnest?
A61627	P. D. Are you in earnest?
A61627	P. D. Are you sure of that?
A61627	P. D. Are you sure of that?
A61627	P. D. Are you sure of that?
A61627	P. D. Are you sure that Dr. St. ever meant any such thing?
A61627	P. D. But I pray Sir, how comes in this discourse about Bishop Abbot?
A61627	P. D. But I pray how?
A61627	P. D. But doth not Dr. St. expresly say, that it was upon the prayers of Christians, that miracle was wrought?
A61627	P. D. But doth not the Cardinal say so?
A61627	P. D. But have you forgotten already, what you so lately told me, that T. G. proved that the generality of the Heathens did worship Deified- men?
A61627	P. D. But if it should remain bread after consecration, what do ye adore then?
A61627	P. D. But is it not lawful to eat Bread and to drink Wine together?
A61627	P. D. But what is all this to the Latin Articles which Dr. St. appealed to, for explication of the English?
A61627	P. D. But what is this to Dr. St.?
A61627	P. D. Call you this a thing of nothing?
A61627	P. D. Call you this proving?
A61627	P. D. Can a man then have an equal esteem of God and a Creature?
A61627	P. D. Can any man give Orders without a Power to do it?
A61627	P. D. Can not T. G. understand the difference between an erroneous belief and an erroneous practical judgement?
A61627	P. D. Can not a man write against your Idolatry, but he must be another Julian?
A61627	P. D. Did he so?
A61627	P. D. Did not they believe there was no other substance but of God present in what they worshipped?
A61627	P. D. Did not they worship the Image of Christ?
A61627	P. D. Do not you give adoration to that which is consecrated, whether it remains a creature or not after consecration?
A61627	P. D. Do you believe a true, proper propitiatory Sacrifice in the Mass, or not?
A61627	P. D. Do you deny this power to be part of jurisdiction?
A61627	P. D. Do you mean that they gave him no external Worship, or that they gave him no worship at all?
A61627	P. D. Do you not perceive?
A61627	P. D. Do you not remember the answer Dr. St. hath already given to this objection?
A61627	P. D. Do you really think any of them did worship meer matter, without life, sense, or understanding for God?
A61627	P. D. Do you think I have forgotten my Creed?
A61627	P. D. Do you think he spake consistently to himself?
A61627	P. D. Doth T. G. call this a second Reason?
A61627	P. D. Doth he indeed say so?
A61627	P. D. Doth he so?
A61627	P. D. Doth he truly?
A61627	P. D. Doth he truly?
A61627	P. D. Doth not the Council of Trent say the character is imprinted upon saying those words, Accipe spiritum sanctum,& c. R. P. What would you be at?
A61627	P. D. For what good end was Dr. St. joyned with these?
A61627	P. D. For what reason?
A61627	P. D. HOw long have you been at the Auction?
A61627	P. D. Have you ever been a hunting of Squirrels?
A61627	P. D. He doth so; but not much to her comfort; for he supposes she may be broken off through unbelief, as well as any other Church?
A61627	P. D. How and where?
A61627	P. D. How can that be giving to a Creature the Worship due to God; if it be not lawful to give this Worship to God which you give to the Creature?
A61627	P. D. How comes it then to be Idolatry supposing the Divinity united to the substance of the Sun?
A61627	P. D. How doth he prove that?
A61627	P. D. How doth it appear necessary, that such an appropriation must be in all circumstances?
A61627	P. D. How is it possible to satisfie men who are resolved to cavil?
A61627	P. D. How is that?
A61627	P. D. How so?
A61627	P. D. How then can there be a power of giving Orders without Authority?
A61627	P. D. I have often heard of this distinction, but I could never be satisfied with it: For what is material and formal Idolatry?
A61627	P. D. I pray tell me for what end were the Fathers appealed to in this dispute about the nature of Idolatry?
A61627	P. D. Is it lawful to give God that worship,( which it is lawful to give absolutely) in a place set apart for his Worship?
A61627	P. D. Is it not then an injury to Gods honour to give that Worship which ought to be peculiar to himself, to any of his Creatures?
A61627	P. D. Is it possible for T. G. to think to fob us off with such answers as these?
A61627	P. D. Is not God worshipped solemnly by us, when we joyn together in prayer to him?
A61627	P. D. Is not Idolatry giving to a Creature the Worship that is due to God?
A61627	P. D. Is not that Power a part of Episcopal Authority?
A61627	P. D. Is not this external worship, that which the Fathers mean, by the adoration that is implyed in prayer?
A61627	P. D. Is not this power given by the very Form of Orders in your Church?
A61627	P. D. Is relative Latria Idolatry?
A61627	P. D. Is the character of Orders given by words that signifie nothing, and carry no effect along with them?
A61627	P. D. Is the improper and relative sacrificing to an Image Idolatry?
A61627	P. D. Is there any true, proper propitiatory Sacrifice, where there is not a consumptive change of that which is Sacrificed?
A61627	P. D. Is there any worship so proper to God, that it can not be improperly and relatively given to an Image?
A61627	P. D. Is this it which T. G. thought worth repeating at large?
A61627	P. D. Is this such a difficulty to be set in the Front?
A61627	P. D. Is this the Just Discharge, to borrow so much out of the Fanatick stock?
A61627	P. D. Is this the weighty observation?
A61627	P. D. Let him take it in what sense he will; doth he not speak of the adoration proper to Latria, or the worship peculiar to God?
A61627	P. D. Must not this due esteem distinguish him from all Creatures?
A61627	P. D. Not deny it?
A61627	P. D. Not take notice of it?
A61627	P. D. Not yet?
A61627	P. D. Not, when you speak to the business: Do you understand what Idolatry is?
A61627	P. D. Of a Crellius?
A61627	P. D. On what I pray?
A61627	P. D. Ought not that Worship then to be so peculiar to him, as to manifest the different esteem we have of the Creatour and his Creatures?
A61627	P. D. Say you so?
A61627	P. D. That is, they gave them Divine Worship, and what then?
A61627	P. D. That should be better proved; For how doth it follow from Justins words?
A61627	P. D. Then I ask, whether offering up ones self, or offering up a cake to a Saint, be the greater Idolatry?
A61627	P. D. Then their fault lay in giving divine Worship to the Image of Christ?
A61627	P. D. Then you ask me, which is the Church of Rome?
A61627	P. D. Then you give Christ the worship due to him, or not?
A61627	P. D. Then you must make the Divinity the Sacrifice; and how can that be a Sacrifice which is capable of no change?
A61627	P. D. This is very ridiculous; but how doth T. G. apply it?
A61627	P. D. To what end should you repeat all that?
A61627	P. D. To what purpose is all this raking, and scraping, and searching, and quoting of passages not at all to the point of Idolatry?
A61627	P. D. To what purpose?
A61627	P. D. Was it not lawful to give the same worship to the Images of the Emperours as to the Emperours themselves?
A61627	P. D. Was it not wisely done?
A61627	P. D. Was that Divine Worship supreme or not?
A61627	P. D. What are those Internal Acts wherein the Worship of the Supreme God consists?
A61627	P. D. What do you mean by this absolute Divine Honour?
A61627	P. D. What follows from hence I beseech you?
A61627	P. D. What hath the speaking Trumpet to do with Idolatry?
A61627	P. D. What is become of the speaking Trumpet now?
A61627	P. D. What is it then but to cavil about words, to deny that to be real Idolatry which at the same time he confesses ought to be interpreted to be so?
A61627	P. D. What is that?
A61627	P. D. What is that?
A61627	P. D. What is the fault then?
A61627	P. D. What is the matter with T. G. that for his life he can understand these things no better, after all the pains which hath been taken about him?
A61627	P. D. What is this but trifling in weighty matters?
A61627	P. D. What is this proper divine honour?
A61627	P. D. What is this to the purpose?
A61627	P. D. What means the giving divine worship as to an absolute Deity?
A61627	P. D. What other way should the difference of moral actions be tried?
A61627	P. D. What parallel doth he mean?
A61627	P. D. What reason can you give for that?
A61627	P. D. What then I beseech you?
A61627	P. D. What then?
A61627	P. D. What then?
A61627	P. D. What was that proper divine worship?
A61627	P. D. What would T. G. have done, had it not been for this practice of bowing towards the Altar?
A61627	P. D. What?
A61627	P. D. Wherein did the nature of this Idolatry lye?
A61627	P. D. Wherein did their fault lye?
A61627	P. D. Wherein lyes this external worship?
A61627	P. D. Which of all the parts is the whole?
A61627	P. D. Who denies that?
A61627	P. D. Who doth not know T. G. to be a man of art?
A61627	P. D. Who ever denyed this?
A61627	P. D. Who knows best?
A61627	P. D. Why doth T. G. go about thus to impose on his Readers without answering what Dr. St. had produced to the contrary?
A61627	P. D. Why not over Arch- Bishop Bramhall, whose words Dr. St. cites?
A61627	P. D. Why so?
A61627	P. D. Why so?
A61627	P. D. Will T. G. never understand the difference between the intention of the person and the Nature of the Act?
A61627	P. D. Will T. G. stand to it, that this is Idolatry?
A61627	P. D. Will the same reason hold against bowing out of Reverence to Almighty God?
A61627	P. D. Will you stand to this?
A61627	P. D. Yes; what have you to say more about them?
A61627	P. D. You take the course to do it, with all this impertinency; but what is it you have to say?
A61627	R. P. And do not you think these expressions highly injurious to that inestimable Sacrifice which Christ himself Offered upon the Cross?
A61627	R. P. And what follows?
A61627	R. P. And what then?
A61627	R. P. And what then?
A61627	R. P. And what then?
A61627	R. P. And what then?
A61627	R. P. Are there so many Books to be had about Liberty of Conscience?
A61627	R. P. But can not we say, that we only worship God before an Image, and do not give any Religious worship to the Image, and then the case is parallel?
A61627	R. P. But do not you think that Dr. St. had some secret design in all this really to subvert the Authority of the Church of England?
A61627	R. P. But doth not Dr. St. allow a possibility of falshood notwithstanding all this pretence of Certainty?
A61627	R. P. But doth not S. Paul say, that the Heathens offered to Devils and not to God; and will you make S. Paul to contradict himself?
A61627	R. P. But hath he done this indeed?
A61627	R. P. But hath not Christ promised that the Gates of Hell shall never prevail against his Church?
A61627	R. P. But how then come in those words produced by T. G.?
A61627	R. P. But how will you know what external Acts of worship those are which are peculiar to God?
A61627	R. P. But is it not a Fundamental Errour to destroy the doctrine of the second Commandment?
A61627	R. P. But is it not an undeniable Maxime, that no man can give to another, that which he hath not himself?
A61627	R. P. But may not I shew respect to the Cross for Christs sake, without giving the same worship to the Cross, that I do to Christ?
A61627	R. P. But may not a man innocently mistake?
A61627	R. P. But suppose they thought access to God was only by them?
A61627	R. P. But this is but one single passage, and will you condemn a whole Church for that?
A61627	R. P. But what are these appropriate Acts of Divine Worship?
A61627	R. P. But what have you got by all this?
A61627	R. P. But what is this to the worship of Images?
A61627	R. P. But what other argument have you to prove that P. Heylin could not speak this of the charge of Idolatry?
A61627	R. P. But what say you to S. Augustin whom Dr. St. represents as the most baffled by the Heathens in this point?
A61627	R. P. But why did not Dr. St. answer punctually to all that T. G. said?
A61627	R. P. But why then doth he call it Moral Certainty?
A61627	R. P. Did you ever hear of the speaking Trumpet?
A61627	R. P. Do not you know the Council of Trent hath expresly defined it, and anathematized all those who say the contrary?
A61627	R. P. Do not you think making God the soul of the world is setting up a false God?
A61627	R. P. Doth not Dr. St. make express Scripture his most certain rule of Faith?
A61627	R. P. Doth not S. Paul say, that the Roman faith was spoken of throughout the World?
A61627	R. P. Doth not this justifie the Quakers in denying to give any external honour to a Creature?
A61627	R. P. Hath God tyed us by his command to offer Sacrifice, or burn Incense, or make Vows to him?
A61627	R. P. Have I not told you already, that the Church of England doth not allow any worship to be given to the Altar?
A61627	R. P. How can the nature of such acts be determined wholly by circumstances, unless the appropriation of them be taken away?
A61627	R. P. How did the Gentiles to their false Gods?
A61627	R. P. How is that?
A61627	R. P. How then can your Divines hold a real presence of Christs Body, as T. G. saith they do?
A61627	R. P. I tell you I read none of his Books, and know not what he hath written, but as I find it in T. G. P. D. What is that?
A61627	R. P. If the first Christians had upon their knees in time of prayer begged S. James his benediction, had this been an unlawful Act of Worship?
A61627	R. P. If they are but inferiour Truths, saith T. G. was it worth the while to rend asunder the Peace of Christendom for them?
A61627	R. P. Is it not for the honour of a Person to praise God for him?
A61627	R. P. Is there not a Catholick Church?
A61627	R. P. May I know what they are Sir?
A61627	R. P. Might not he be said, to offer up God himself to God as a Sacrifice?
A61627	R. P. Might not they believe Christ to be assumed as Consort in the Empire, and so absolute Divine Honour to be due to him?
A61627	R. P. Might not those, as T. G. saith, who were at the foot of the Cross, offer up the Son of God on the Cross to the Father?
A61627	R. P. Therefore waving this, I come to the main point; whether the Heathen Jupiter were the true God, or an Arch- Devil?
A61627	R. P. To what purpose is all this charge and pains, if there be an infallible Church?
A61627	R. P. To what purpose?
A61627	R. P. What do you make then this worship of the Arians to be?
A61627	R. P. What do you mean by this appropriating acts of worship to God?
A61627	R. P. What do you mean?
A61627	R. P. What is it you understand by appropriate acts of Divine Worship?
A61627	R. P. What is it?
A61627	R. P. What need you ask that, when I have told you already?
A61627	R. P. What saith my Fanatick Acquaintance to all this?
A61627	R. P. What say you to Dr. St.''s obs ● rvations of the Council of Trent about the Worship of Images?
A61627	R. P. What then?
A61627	R. P. What think you of the notion of Idolatry he chargeth on T. G.?
A61627	R. P. What think you, was Robert Abbot Bishop of Salisbury a Puritan or not?
A61627	R. P. What will become of the Rules of the Church, saith T. G. if men may be permitted to break them for such Capriches as these are?
A61627	R. P. What would you have a man do?
A61627	R. P. What would you have?
A61627	R. P. Whereabouts are they now in the Catalogue?
A61627	R. P. Which is that Catholick Church?
A61627	R. P. Who are they who have written for it?
A61627	R. P. Who doubts of that?
A61627	R. P. Why do you ask me such an impertinent question?
A61627	R. P. Why do you ask me such an impertinent question?
A61627	R. P. Why do you ask these questions?
A61627	R. P. Why not?
A61627	R. P. Why should you question that?
A61627	R. P. Will not the same reason hold against bowing to the Altar; bowing being an act of worship appropriated to God?
A61627	R. P. Will you never be satisfied?
A61627	R. P. Yes, but what then?
A61627	R. P. You are very severe methinks; but do you think there is no difference among Idolaters?
A61627	R. P. You shall not escape thus; what say you to bowing to the Altar, is not that as great Idolatry, as worship of Images?
A61627	Say you so?
A61627	Suppose the Priests Intention should wander, what would the Peoples uniting their intentions signifie towards the Sacrifice?
A61627	Suppose they were Jews; must they therefore needs be Idolaters?
A61627	T. G. speaks somewhat faintly in this matter, at first saying only, Why might it not be absolute?
A61627	That which Justin saith is, that what he attributes to Devils, the Poets attribute to God himself and his Sons: and what then?
A61627	The Altar?
A61627	The Church of Constantinople, or the Church of Jerusalem?
A61627	The Church of Rome?
A61627	The next step may be, that the sacrificing may depend on the Peoples Intentions as well as the Priests; and what a case are you in then?
A61627	The whole Christian Church?
A61627	These are matters of great moment, if they hold good; doth he pass all these by, only to fall upon one single Testimony?
A61627	This Book happened to come under the Spanish Index of Cardinal Quiroga; do you think he would suffer it to stand as it did?
A61627	This debate in truth comes to this point at last, whether there ought to be any such thing as a peculiar external worship of God or not?
A61627	This is the current Divinity of the Modern Schools; and what obliges them to look into the opinions of former Ages?
A61627	This is therefore the single point to be debated, whether according to Minucius they understood the same God or not?
A61627	Those that made the Canon or you?
A61627	Tolet, that Idolatry doth suppose an error in the mind, in judging that to deserve divine honour which doth not?
A61627	Was Jupiter O. M. one of these dead men?
A61627	Was it Idolatry to pray to Diana as an inferiour Deity which presided over hunting, and is it none to pray to S. Hubert on the like account?
A61627	Was it Idolatry to pray to Vesta to preserve from the Fire, and is it none to pray to S. Agatha?
A61627	Was it T. G.''s design then, not to dispute what was the sense of the Church of England; nor whether Dr. St. dissented from it?
A61627	Was it not to prove Idolatry consistent with the acknowledgement of one Supreme God?
A61627	Was not the Church of Rome once a sound and Catholick Church?
A61627	Was not this enough to put any man out of humour?
A61627	Was the wise Council of Nice, so immaterial a thing?
A61627	Was there nothing material in what concerns the charge of Contradictions, Paradoxes, School- disputes,& c.?
A61627	Was this his way to perswade the men of Lystra to leave the worship of their Gods, to tell them that he came to teach them to worship Jupiter?
A61627	Was this meant by Athenagoras of the true God, or of the Arch- devil?
A61627	Well; but what is this horrible crime about Gregory Nyssen?
A61627	Were all these Heads and Fountains too?
A61627	Were the Gnosticks and ancient Hereticks to blame in their Worship of Images, or not?
A61627	Were the Romans ignorant of that, which Tertullian saith, no man could be ignorant of?
A61627	What a fine insinuation is couched under all this?
A61627	What becomes then of the Authority of these Councils?
A61627	What can this signifie, if he did not take the Worship of Images to be Idolatry?
A61627	What connexion was there between this Hypothesis, and the disparagement which Images did imply to the Divine Nature?
A61627	What could be said more express to remove that abominable pretence of the Doctors, that the God of the Romans was the true God?
A61627	What do you mean by the Catholick Church?
A61627	What do you tell me of a Bishop of Salisbury for a Puritan?
A61627	What do you think of this argument?
A61627	What doth T. G. answer to that?
A61627	What doth T. G. think now?
A61627	What doth he worship himself?
A61627	What force is there in this arguing, if Athenagoras did not look on Plato''s God and the Christians to be the same?
A61627	What force were there in this argument; if the God they owned were not the true God, but an Arch- devil?
A61627	What is all this to giving Religious Worship to the Altar?
A61627	What is it in the Church of England you do charge with Idolatry?
A61627	What is that I beseech you?
A61627	What is that, I pray?
A61627	What is that, when they believed him to be a Creature?
A61627	What is the matter man?
A61627	What is there in all this in the least repugnant to what Dr. St. had delivered?
A61627	What is there in these Meletetiques, but what is the duty of every good man, to see God in his works?
A61627	What mean all those sayings of Fathers, all those Canons of Councils, wherein this very manner of Worship was condemned for Idolatry?
A61627	What nonsense and contradiction would T. G. cry out upon, if Dr. St. had ever said any such thing?
A61627	What pity it is T. G. had no better a Cause, he sets this off so prettily?
A61627	What prices do they give for a Justin Martyr, or Epiphanius or Philo, who they say was a meer Jew?
A61627	What saith T. G. to that?
A61627	What saith T. G. to this?
A61627	What saith T. G. to this?
A61627	What saith T. G. to this?
A61627	What say you to his Irenicum in the first place?
A61627	What should he do?
A61627	What think you now Sir?
A61627	What think you of the Christian Church condemning the Carpocratians for worshipping an Image of Christ?
A61627	What union is there between the Divine Nature and a Crucifix?
A61627	What was T. G.''s design in this, if it were not to prove the charge of Idolatry to be against the sense of the Church of England?
A61627	What was to be done in this case?
A61627	What wonderful discovery is this, which T. G. hath made?
A61627	When they intend to write against him; then, have you Dr. St.''s Irenicum?
A61627	Where are the measures and bounds fixed, that thus far we may go and no farther?
A61627	Where doth he ever assume any such title to himself?
A61627	Where lyes the consequence?
A61627	Wherein I beseech you?
A61627	Wherein the Nature of that Divine Worship lyes, which being given to a Creature makes it Idolatry?
A61627	Whether it were consistent with the acknowledgement of one supreme God?
A61627	Whether it were the Fathers own sense that Jupiter was the Supreme God?
A61627	Whether the Fathers do not acknowledge that this was pretended by the Heathens?
A61627	Whether the Heathens did not acknowledge one Supreme God?
A61627	Whether the Heathens did not pretend that they understood this Supreme God by Jupiter, and accordingly gave him the titles due to the Supreme God?
A61627	Whether you have not as much reason to separate from the Church of England, as the Church of England had from the Church of Rome?
A61627	Whether you think the Heathens Idolatry did lye in worshipping meer matter as God?
A61627	Which is as much as to say, he deserves to stand in the Pillory for suborning Witnesses, and why should he be credited in any thing he saith?
A61627	Who is it I pray hath the knack of saying, and unsaying; of affirming and denying the very same thing in a few leaves?
A61627	Why Hincmarus re- ordained those who had been ordained by Ebbo, because he had been deposed?
A61627	Why Leo 9. in a Synod voided all Simoniacal Ordinations?
A61627	Why Pope Lucius 3. did re- ordain those who had been ordained by Octavianus the Anti- pope?
A61627	Why Stephanus 4. re- ordained those who had received Orders from Pope Constantine?
A61627	Why Stephanus 6. re- ordained those which were ordained by Formosus?
A61627	Why Vrban 2. declared Nezelon or Wecilo an excommunicate Bishop of Ments to have no power of giving Orders?
A61627	Why did not T. G. rather answer these arguments, than make odious comparisons of him, with Viret and Beza?
A61627	Why doth T. G. go about to deceive the world in making it believe that all their Invocation is only praying to pray for them?
A61627	Why is it necessary to leave this Church, in which persons are baptized, and not in that before Luther?
A61627	Why is there not an external act of Idolatry, as well as of perjury, theft, murder and the like?
A61627	Why may we not worship Trees, and Fountains, Earth, and Water, and the whole Host of Heaven as well as an Image?
A61627	Why so I pray?
A61627	Why so I pray?
A61627	Why so?
A61627	Why the Ordinations made by Photius were declared null?
A61627	Why then is T. G. ashamed now of it, and denies he had any such design?
A61627	Why then may not Dr. St. discover God in his Creatures, since he asserts so great an assurance of Gods being their Creatour?
A61627	Will T. G. quote the Fathers from one end to the other to prove that all men are sinners?
A61627	Will he tell them, he knows better what they do, than they do themselves?
A61627	Would they have born such things in Plato, Euripides or any other Philosopher or Poet?
A61627	Would they not rather have reproved, censured, condemned them for them, as the most intolerable reproaches of the Divine Nature?
A61627	Yea, more than this, have not the common people been charged with doing these things by your own Divines?
A61627	Yes, saith T. G., there was a distinct Church before Luther, whose communion was necessary to salvation; and what then?
A61627	You know we dare not speak what we think of those times now; and is that fair to accuse when we dare not answer?
A61627	You know well what belongs to a Puritan, do you not?
A61627	You love alwayes to be rubbing upon old Sores; have you forgot the Act of Oblivion?
A61627	and Sacrificing being the offer of a present in token of gratitude, doth that diminish or add to the Act of thanksgiving?
A61627	and because the Church of Rome is not there charged with Idolatry, doth he not hence dispute ex professo, that it was against her sense?
A61627	and did T. G. know it?
A61627	and doth not this rather look like betraying the Church of England than defending it?
A61627	and if it can, how can the notion of Body and Spirit be differenced from each other?
A61627	and of the stop in nature?
A61627	and so praying to Gods Ministers in Heaven is Idolatry; how then will praying to Saints escape?
A61627	and that Clemens believed it at the same time, when he proves from hence that all men have the natural knowledge of God?
A61627	and that the Homilies contained a wholesome and godly Doctrine, which in their consciences they believed to be false and pernicious?
A61627	and that which the Scripture calls Idolatry?
A61627	and to understand the way of fencing in the Schools as well as another?
A61627	and to what end should he then leave out nam and Divinam, but that he thought them needless when the sense was expressed?
A61627	and two and two not make actually four, supposing that they retain their intrinsick aptitude to do it?
A61627	and where is there one word of Platonists or Philosophers in the whole sentence?)
A61627	and whether Jupiter of Creet as worshipped by them was not a false God?
A61627	and who ever said, that he was not a false God?
A61627	and yet never designed to dispute ex professo, whether it were the sense of the Church of England or not?
A61627	and your peculiar doctrines the only Christianity?
A61627	are the Rules of the Church to be observed absolutely, whether against the Law of God or not?
A61627	as if in the dark, a Child should ask blessing of one that is not his Father, would his Father have reason to be angry with him?
A61627	at least as to the generality?
A61627	but another?
A61627	but what need you ask that, since you know it already?
A61627	consider what he writes?
A61627	did they take him for an uncreated creature?
A61627	doth he pretend to answer, and pass by the plainest and strongest arguments, as if they had never been brought?
A61627	doth it take away an Article of the Creed?
A61627	doth this render him suspected for a Puritan at that time?
A61627	for doth it not equally fall upon all external acts where the circumstances do determine them to be signs of Religious Worship?
A61627	hath your Church the Power to repeal the Law of God?
A61627	have you met with an ill bargain at the Auction?
A61627	how else comes the giving absolute worship to be Idolatry, and not the giving relative?
A61627	i. e. did they take the Emperours for supreme Deities?
A61627	if as uncreated, how could they at the same time believe them to be created by him?
A61627	if false, why is it not proved to be so?
A61627	if not, to what purpose is this Testimony brought; unless it be as Countrey people say, for want of a better?
A61627	if not, where lyes the force of the argument?
A61627	if that be uncapable of a change, how can it be a true and proper Sacrifice?
A61627	if they did; why doth he so vainly cavil, about some thing impertinent to the main business, in the very last of all?
A61627	if true, why is it not allowed?
A61627	in attributing that power to the Devil which they give to God?
A61627	is it not of the Heathens he spake of before?
A61627	is it not the substance of the bread?
A61627	is there not all the reason in the world to explain the English Articles by the Latin, since we are sure they had not two meanings?
A61627	no, that is intolerable; and how if they prove true?
A61627	nor, whether Dr. St. dissented from the sense of his Church?
A61627	of Dr. St.''s Ignorance, intolerable mistake, shameful errors, tergiversation, and what not?
A61627	of Impanation?
A61627	or all persons are bound to return to the Church of Rome?
A61627	or do you think any that believed a God, gave him no inward worship, i. e. no Reverence or esteem suitable to his Excellency?
A61627	or else from the circumstances which did make it appear that more than civil worship was required?
A61627	or ever entred the lists, but on the account of obedience, or upon great provocation?
A61627	or in giving divine worship to any men?
A61627	or is this another piece of T. G.''s fineness?
A61627	or that tended that way?
A61627	or the Blood of Christ, which he being the Eternal Son of God did offer up to his Father, as a propitiation for the sins of Mankind?
A61627	or was it fair to pretend to answer Dr. St.''s Book, wherein all these things are, and yet to pass them over, as if they had never been written?
A61627	ought he not to examine and disprove them?
A61627	p. 495 Whether the Church hath power to discriminate Acts of Worship?
A61627	p. 499 How far circumstances discriminate Acts of Civil and Religious Worship?
A61627	shall we not applaud him for a man of wonderful integrity, and most commendable ingenuity?
A61627	sleeping?
A61627	supposing the Christians looked on the Emperours as Gods Vicegerents, and the Images only as representing them?
A61627	that it must now be quite abandoned, and no kind of Discharge be so much as offered to be made for it?
A61627	that might prove them no Christians, but doth it prove them Idolaters?
A61627	the Offering of God to God?
A61627	the bit reserved to close up the stomach with?
A61627	therefore leaving out Christ is Idolatry?
A61627	was it absolute, or relative?
A61627	was it not in the Author?
A61627	was this man a secret Friend to the Church of Rome do you think?
A61627	what comfort is there in bare Nonconformity?
A61627	what did T. G. intend to prove by it?
A61627	what evidence doth T. G. produce for this?
A61627	what have we to do with Luther?
A61627	when I only answer a Question you asked me?
A61627	where is the change made, if not in the Body of Christ?
A61627	whether the generality of the Heathens did not worship Deified men?
A61627	whether you do not think that the Heathens, at least the generality of them did not acknowledge and worship more Gods than one?
A61627	which all persons do who are not Atheists; And is this a thing to be exposed to scorn and derision?
A61627	which he acknowledges to be made by him?
A61627	who can stand before such demonstrations?
A61627	who ever heard me, without having something to say against you?
A61627	whoever said they could, or how doth that follow?
A61627	why may not divisibility be separated from a line?
A61627	why so sad?