quadgram

This is a table of type quadgram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.

quadgram frequency
seems to have been44
one of the most43
at the same time43
the end of the38
he seems to have33
in the hands of26
in the time of26
come down to us25
at the age of25
the history of the23
is one of the21
on the one hand20
it is probable that19
in the history of19
after the death of19
for the most part19
as well as the18
to have been a17
under the name of17
the publication of the16
at the end of16
the greater part of16
in the reign of16
the close of the15
at the head of15
in the form of15
it is impossible to15
of the latin language15
on the other hand15
on the death of14
is said to have13
for the first time13
was one of the13
the way in which13
of the reign of13
have come down to12
of the middle ages12
to the death of12
in the middle ages12
seem to have been12
side by side with12
the last of the12
the whole of the12
one of the great12
at the close of11
the art of love11
it is in the11
he was born at11
has come down to11
in the case of11
the history of roman11
the reader is referred11
reader is referred to10
about the same time10
in the year b10
a man of letters10
as a man of10
so far as it10
the name of the10
of the ciceronian age10
the rest of the10
to a great extent10
as a young man10
as one of the10
the author of the10
in one of his10
the first punic war10
as that of the10
in the course of10
in his old age10
of the silver age10
in so far as10
speaks of him as10
in spite of the10
that he was a9
of the augustan age9
the reign of tiberius9
and seems to have9
of the first century9
one of the chief9
than that of the9
the later years of9
the head of the9
his account of the9
the character of the9
man of the world9
in more than one9
of which he was9
the beginning of the9
as well as in9
is by no means9
the first book of9
there can be no9
the death of augustus9
of the most important9
with regard to the9
as it had been9
will be found in9
he came to rome9
the writers of the9
the date of his8
towards the end of8
the same time he8
until the time of8
it is possible that8
to that of the8
like that of the8
the year of his8
it is true that8
it will be seen8
the reign of nero8
of the art of8
the account of the8
not seem to have8
was a man of8
does not seem to8
the death of his8
of the augustan poets8
to have been the8
in the sphere of8
he is said to8
a large number of8
to be found in8
from time to time8
the part of the8
of the second century8
the rest of his8
the period of the8
to the end of8
for the purpose of8
with the death of8
the first of these8
years of his life7
the reign of domitian7
the middle of the7
in one of the7
a few years later7
the work of a7
of the civil war7
of the classical period7
the origin of the7
the second book of7
the work of the7
of the first book7
in the highest degree7
it is clear that7
on the history of7
translations from the greek7
the composition of the7
an account of the7
but at the same7
history of roman literature7
the time of the7
the death of the7
can be no doubt7
the reigns of caligula7
as we have seen7
the first three books7
of the fourth century7
in the temple of7
of the history of7
except in so far7
of the civil wars7
from first to last7
was the author of7
the de natura deorum7
the hands of the7
on the part of7
of the roman empire7
of all that was7
and one of the7
the influence of the7
in spite of his6
be found in the6
the most important of6
but it is a6
in accordance with the6
he appears to have6
took the place of6
in a later age6
at a time when6
within a few years6
the form of a6
to the circle of6
he was the first6
in the same year6
the inner circle of6
may be read with6
from the accession of6
in the first book6
of one of the6
it is one of6
of a later age6
by far the most6
a short account of6
men of the world6
the reign of augustus6
the poetry of the6
be out of place6
the first and second6
of the roman state6
it must be remembered6
the early history of6
after the battle of6
it is certain that6
in the age of6
the prologue to the6
the time of sulla6
sense of the word6
in the art of6
the story of the6
the same time the6
in the fourth century6
the fourth book of6
in favour of the6
the use of the6
on the subject of6
the nature of the6
as we learn from6
it is doubtful whether6
in the first rank6
for its own sake6
the battle of philippi6
from that of the6
the reigns of the6
the year of the6
history of the roman6
of some of the6
way in which he6
in which he was6
the first of the6
of the younger scipio6
as well as of6
the age of the6
first book of the6
to the age of6
a few of the6
it is difficult to6
death of marcus aurelius6
of the roman world6
year of his age6
of the roman people6
the subject of the6
the conclusion of the6
he speaks of the6
so far as to6
on the side of6
he had been a6
in the middle of6
in the year of6
we are struck by5
in the use of5
throughout the middle ages5
which has come down5
the description of a5
some think it was5
cras amet qui nunquam5
it is not certain5
we can well believe5
of the twelve tables5
the third and fourth5
the de rerum natura5
history of latin literature5
the great questions of5
as soon as he5
amet qui nunquam amavit5
will be seen that5
the literature of rome5
of such men as5
the foundation of the5
work of the same5
on the ground that5
in the hope of5
the manner of the5
on account of his5
it was not until5
the literature of the5
his work on the5
of which the first5
to a certain extent5
was that of a5
of his death is5
rest of his life5
and there can be5
of the third century5
at the present day5
a few years of5
of his own time5
the first time in5
so far as the5
took place in the5
far removed from the5
of the new religion5
in the first place5
the three books of5
three books of the5
the causes of the5
if he had not5
on the th of5
is probable that the5
must be remembered that5
be no doubt that5
the empire and the5
it will be remembered5
which we still possess5
he was an intimate5
little is known of5
the language of the5
of the golden age5
the time of cicero5
beyond the limits of5
that there was a5
became more and more5
to the student of5
during the reign of5
from the fact that5
in greek and latin5
the history of literature5
it was in the5
the most interesting of5
the whole range of5
with the exception of5
there is no doubt5
not appear to have5
in the second book5
suited to the latin5
the death of marcus5
the prose of the5
the age of twenty5
in the augustan age5
as a sort of5
the works of the5
same as that of5
as we have already5
to have been written5
of the eighteenth century5
one of his letters5
after the manner of5
was born in the5
book of the odes5
it is easy to5
the first rank of5
one of the greatest5
that of the augustan5
on the other side5
the poem of lucretius5
it must have been5
in spite of all5
of the first order5
nor is there any5
the second punic war5
in prose and verse5
are struck by the5
the cause of his5
the second and third5
of the second book5
of the first rank5
it was not till5
history of the empire5
little more than a5
it is full of5
the nature of things5
fourth book of the5
of the death of5
were by no means5
the time of claudius5
as we can judge5
as we know from5
the same as that5
but it is the5
in the following year5
the opening of the5
it is necessary to5
far as we can5
to the study of5
with which the poem5
in his account of4
the accession of tiberius4
which the poem opens4
from the earliest period4
is the same as4
are among the most4
first half of the4
the earlier part of4
the offices of state4
can well believe that4
of greek and roman4
as well as his4
it is not the4
the world of letters4
a considerable number of4
would not have been4
the whole field of4
it not been for4
were more or less4
the legend of the4
the father of the4
a vast number of4
laid the foundation of4
the chapter with a4
have the names of4
of the most brilliant4
in the domain of4
on the marriage of4
that on behalf of4
the circle of the4
speaks of them as4
he was able to4
to the rank of4
he was born in4
the authors of the4
had it not been4
it may have been4
the shortening of final4
quique amavit cras amet4
as in the case4
the head of all4
it is just this4
of his own age4
and that of the4
was a young man4
we know that he4
of plautus and terence4
the schools of rhetoric4
for the sake of4
does not appear to4
the age of cicero4
some of the most4
the letters from pontus4
of the whole work4
if he had been4
with one or two4
of the alexandrian school4
as well as by4
is a mixture of4
the progress of the4
the earlier years of4
on which he was4
the establishment of the4
was by no means4
the battle of actium4
we have the names4
the world of the4
in spite of its4
we may be sure4
it is astonishing how4
at least of the4
until the close of4
are the work of4
they seem to have4
how it was that4
the form of dialogue4
but he does not4
at the beginning of4
great work of art4
the genius of the4
specimens of early latin4
the events of his4
with that of the4
the reader will find4
the first half of4
is to be found4
an intimate friend of4
it is to be4
as the author of4
that it is a4
the death of terence4
until the reign of4
could not but be4
of a man of4
as well as for4
he does not appear4
the court of nero4
theory of the universe4
the reigns of vespasian4
and this is the4
and by no means4
we should infer that4
treatment of the subject4
on the ground of4
the first two books4
at the height of4
in the later years4
the latin language was4
paved the way for4
as far as the4
in the poetry of4
end of the reign4
of the character of4
the dignity of the4
seems to have written4
the author of a4
as well as to4
of the speeches of4
into the mouth of4
that he did not4
in the schools of4
we must not forget4
we have seen that4
book of the epistles4
the best known of4
after the example of4
is referred to the4
he must have been4
of the reigns of4
of the universe which4
he was a man4
the history of rome4
said to have been4
than that of any4
a history of the4
brought to bear on4
referred to in the4
speaks of himself as4
is reported to have4
one of the best4
the development of the4
but it is not4
been the subject of4
the spirit of the4
would be hard to4
of the latin race4
soon after his death4
book of the satires4
is shown by the4
the poems of catullus4
shortening of final o4
under the title of4
the whole of his4
was at this time4
the most learned of4
of the first punic4
of the governing class4
the age of thirty4
and for a time4
as well as a4
and the death of4
which he tells us4
to one of the4
one of the principal4
to the class of4
the work of his4
was the first to4
we do not find4
at the hands of4
the two most eminent4
lady of high birth4
supposed to have been4
at a later period4
has given rise to4
put an end to4
some have thought that4
he rose to the4
the fact that he4
way in which the4
circle of the younger4
conclude the chapter with4
one of the two4
the lives of the4
compared with that of4
the way for the4
in the next age4
of the ancient world4
of the value of4
end of the first4
in the work of4
to the latin language4
soon after the death4
the list of his4
died at the age4
on the whole the4
addressed to him by4
by the name of4
by no means so4
as it is of4
a member of the4
with every variety of4
all kinds of subjects4
there can be little4
can be little doubt4
the history of his4
is written in a4
that have come down4
the fear of death4
a man of the4
in the literature of4
one of the first4
fragments and specimens of4
the second half of4
such as it was4
on the whole he4
we shall not find4
the plan of the4
of nerva and trajan4
which seems to have4
in the third satire4
the theory of the4
it is evident that4
parts of the empire4
a type of the4
as is well known4
he goes on to4
to return to rome4
be sought in the4
the charm of the4
as well as from4
the success of the4
we learn from the4
of the life of4
greater part of his4
with an account of4
of the pervigilium veneris4
of which we possess4
had been in the4
is supposed to have4
that he was not4
in a high degree4
in a great measure4
to return to the4
the eruption of vesuvius4
he is the first4
far beyond the limits4
that it is the4
to be regretted that4
must have been a4
among the most interesting4
a professor of rhetoric4
of the second rank4
a young man he4
of peleus and thetis4
in the last book4
the power of the4
a poet of the4
no less than in4
writers of the empire4
by the same author4
the case with the4
the style of the4
studied for the bar4
in the second and4
the loss of the4
is a good instance4
to say that the4
it is by no4
of these two great4
to the influence of4
on a level with4
in which it is4
and specimens of early4
he studied for the4
are perhaps the most4
we find that he4
for a long time4
it seemed as if4
between rome and carthage4
seems to have had4
the study of the4
served his first campaign4
of his later years4
but it is clear3
and in some respects3
of his own day3
death of julius caesar3
for the rest of3
in which he did3
the resources of his3
it is likely that3
the roman conception of3
the conspiracy of piso3
the narrative of the3
throughout the reign of3
for that of the3
the place of his3
if we may believe3
we infer that he3
in the reigns of3
is a poem of3
with the spirit of3
of the civilised world3
books of the aeneid3
of the younger pliny3
which the young nobles3
that it was written3
for more than half3
the testimony of a3
as we have said3
written in saturnian verse3
as early as b3
to be regarded as3
on the nature of3
we have already seen3
it is hard to3
to the duties of3
the death of drusus3
of an epic on3
historical work of the3
of the present day3
went so far as3
young man he had3
above the level of3
a century after the3
and on the whole3
the basis of a3
of the seventeenth century3
not so much from3
and conclude the chapter3
but he was no3
to the history of3
he now and then3
which had been so3
a century and a3
of his work is3
the only one which3
it was inevitable that3
is known to have3
the introduction of greek3
in the opening of3
an intimate acquaintance of3
the next ten years3
in proportion as they3
list of editions recommended3
and even in the3
of the old language3
main characteristics of the3
the series of his3
if it had been3
the music of the3
to celebrate the victory3
form of the original3
in all his works3
by no means an3
the care with which3
at the opening of3
during the middle ages3
the death of tiberius3
but this is a3
the growth of the3
in a way that3
a picture of the3
the author of an3
as much as the3
bear witness to the3
to a certain degree3
of art and letters3
end of the second3
he served his first3
alluded to in the3
is perhaps the most3
from those of the3
at the battle of3
in the intervals of3
to the position of3
to which the name3
the freedom with which3
an epic on the3
of the age of3
the age of seventeen3
history began to be3
of a new literary3
the main points of3
second book of the3
is such as to3
in the third and3
well believe that the3
that he wrote the3
he proceeds to the3
formed part of the3
a work on the3
the beginnings of the3
the description of the3
the death of cicero3
poet of the first3
out of place to3
most important of his3
but it was probably3
in the second half3
empire and the church3
a careful study of3
so far from being3
a new literary epoch3
with a view to3
seems to have given3
of the world of3
of the more important3
the labours of the3
to be the more3
the circle of maecenas3
more than that of3
the single exception of3
marriage of peleus and3
for a moment to3
if he did not3
a good instance of3
it was the first3
must be regarded as3
his description of the3
will be seen from3
the form of the3
the religion of the3
in command of the3
serious business of life3
or at any rate3
mass of the people3
of the most interesting3
the death of caesar3
be traced in the3
it would be a3
the time of nero3
the imagination of the3
characteristic of the man3
the fragments of the3
from the writings of3
of cicero and caesar3
not by any means3
went hand in hand3
and if we possessed3
of the men who3
caused him to be3
by the history of3
there is nothing in3
could no longer be3
of grammar and rhetoric3
years of the death3
to do the same3
the accession of trajan3
what can be more3
there is room for3
that it was the3
in the eyes of3
all that was most3
the heart of the3
of which have been3
an old man of3
of the neronian age3
of the fifteenth century3
of thought and language3
the earliest and the3
the poem on the3
his death is not3
a lady of high3
from the style of3
with the name of3
a specimen of the3
for a short time3
the decay of freedom3
year of his death3
the words of a3
the culture of the3
from the fragments of3
on the same subject3
of the origin of3
the great work of3
addressed to his son3
on the causes of3
must be based on3
of a high order3
he has to say3
by side with the3
the hero of the3
the fact that it3
of his private letters3
the place of the3
to the fourth book3
books of the odes3
the great orators of3
is the first and3
a teacher of rhetoric3
the weight of his3
the burden of his3
the reign of commodus3
would seem to have3
which he alludes to3
of the great greek3
tiberius to the death3
all that was best3
a writer of some3
is much to be3
that there is no3
century and a half3
was that of the3
to the court of3
the extant fragments of3
this point of view3
of the earlier republic3
had the privilege of3
account of the earliest3
of the great orator3
it occurs in the3
the fashion of the3
importance in the history3
of which the great3
shows that he was3
to have been an3
one of the foremost3
to say nothing of3
a treatise on the3
to the number of3
it is not only3
the domain of history3
the action of the3
of all his compositions3
that in the second3
in the fifteenth century3
the doctrine of the3
foundation of the city3
of the subject will3
the marriage of peleus3
an eighth book to3
of lucretius and catullus3
of the most celebrated3
that many of the3
death of the elder3
at the time of3
implies that he had3
the most eloquent of3
the care of the3
the satires and epistles3
from the greek of3
the history of latin3
though it does not3
a younger contemporary of3
he is known to3
the victory of sena3
in the first century3
that he had a3
as long as the3
by the fact that3
to be more than3
the story of his3
has led him to3
may be compared with3
the outbreak of the3
as a specimen of3
literary point of view3
the existence of the3
in which he lived3
a catalogue of the3
to cope with the3
but he is a3
in point of time3
by the influence of3
the value of the3
the skill with which3
but it is in3
in which he wrote3
date of his birth3
which we are now3
and the progress of3
but it may be3
the culmination of latin3
as though it were3
the passion of love3
and at the same3
with whom he was3
the fact that the3
the earlier books of3
part of the work3
in one or two3
a general history of3
in his theory of3
one might almost say3
the fragment that remains3
by him in the3
according to his own3
the objects of his3
the same thing is3
on the events of3
decay of classical latin3
half of the line3
in the sense of3
the tragedies of seneca3
is the work of3
he himself tells us3
the ears of the3
and the want of3
could not fail to3
reigns of nerva and3
the mouth of a3
the burning of the3
to his native town3
by no means a3
we did not possess3
the history of livy3
in a period of3
is found in the3
it was one of3
to men of letters3
and in a way3
the legends connected with3
of the menippean satires3
in the times of3
at once became the3
the taste of the3
some of his verses3
the latin of the3
it has often been3
and it is easy3
he continued to write3
the settlement of the3
of the twelve caesars3
of the time of3
it is obvious that3
appear to have been3
is the way in3
and the fact that3
master of the world3
was a member of3
from beginning to end3
to the pursuit of3
seems to have brought3
that the aeneid was3
if it were not3
an introduction to the3
history of roman oratory3
the loss of which3
to show that he3
of the modern world3
it is uncertain whether3
that of cicero in3
the death of m3
but on the whole3
the year in which3
the form of an3
as has been said3
writer of the first3
he would have been3
in its present form3
the worship of the3
one of the earliest3
is far removed from3
in the composition of3
is no longer the3
we must remember that3
of the poem in3
a great work of3
the third book of3
through the middle ages3
celebrate the victory of3
of it as a3
by the advice of3
the desire to write3
of the augustan history3
so far as he3
is clear from the3
as a matter of3
may have had some3
of the imperial government3
may have been the3
the works of this3
some of the more3
a part of the3
both in greek and3
he was followed by3
so long as the3
atoms and the void3
the circumstances of the3
the greatest of roman3
he returned to rome3
of the second punic3
the political and social3
the poet of the3
him one of the3
more than half the3
seems to point to3
the accession of nerva3
but even in the3
they should have been3
a continuation of the3
the tenth book of3
of the work of3
half a century later3
of a great roman3
art of love was3
the death of nero3
a high opinion of3
relation of philosophy to3
to suppose that he3
which is refuted by3
hadrian and the antonines3
the time of augustus3
in the manner of3
the treatise to herennius3
the fourth and fifth3
nearly every department of3
has descended to us3
he was one of3
may be referred to3
age in which he3
more than anything else3
in the field of3
the year before the3
of a golden age3
with regard to his3
on behalf of the3
that was best in3
on the world of3
the fragments of his3
put into the mouth3
is not to be3
from the first to3
that they should have3
in all of which3
history of the first3
it was only when3
and it was only3
that they are the3
of tiberius to the3
the years which followed3
he was sent to3
there is not a3
even in his lifetime3
a sketch of the3
issued from his pen3
of some of his3
that he had been3
to him in a3
he is one of3
a few examples of3
in that of the3
is the only one3
of the two great3
life of the capital3
we should infer from3
in which he had3
in an abridged form3
of translations from the3
of the later empire3
in the writings of3
rise to the opinion3
the subject of much3
of himself as a3
of the praetorian guards3
in the first three3
was executed in the3
through the influence of3
end of the fourth3
could hardly have been3
the extinction of the3
know that he was3
speaks of his own3
in the persons of3
is the subject of3
know from other sources3
there is probably no3
to the name of3
it is not easy3
and returned to rome3
not be out of3
it does not seem3
the level of a3
of his philosophical works3
shall not find in3
he was obliged to3
at rome in the3
as the representative of3
that it may be3
of the augustan period3
the death of julius3
may have been a3
later years of the3
in nearly every department3
the song of the3
age of the republic3
the opinion of the3
in imitation of the3
he was a young3
translated or adapted from3
the epistle to the3
it would have been3
to the opinion that3
not only in his3
but as a rule3
as may be supposed3
thus it is that3
of rome by the3
reminds us of the3
of the empire to3
with the education of3
the course of his3
that it is impossible3
it seems best to3
the five books of3
he began to write3
and the number of3
in the pages of3
of the most difficult3
in a sort of3
few years of the3
may be traced in3
same is true of3
a place among the3
that he had not3
over and over again3
him to be the3
the main characteristics of3
in a style which3
second half of the3
in the works of3
the mouth of the3
the reign of caligula3
prose of the ciceronian3
to his own time3
is the burden of3
the world by the3
the war with hannibal3
the decay of eloquence3
down to us in3
at an early age3
of the upper classes3
of the dignity of3
middle and new comedy3
it is written in3
he lived in the3
if we did not3
a very early period3
of the development of3
written in the same3
a friend of the3
for the benefit of3
outbreak of the civil3
that of any of3
in his own person3
work seems to have3
are accustomed to associate3
the opinion that he3
as contrasted with the3
of the empress livia3
the case of the3
the three flavian emperors3
up to the end3
by the names of3
an end in itself3
of the fifth book3
early in the reign3
well as in the3
the best example of3
peleus and thetis is3
from this point of3
rome by the gauls3
which he was a3
there is no trace3
a large amount of3
was an adept in3
treaty between rome and3
in the life of3
is shown in the3
likely to have been3
by one of the3
to the praises of3
in the words of3
if we possessed the3
of prose and verse3
in the circle of3
on the power of3
any other latin poet3
to the conclusion that3
the most eminent of3
in which all the3
the influence of accent3
eighth book to the3
what he has to3
the hands of inferior3
more akin to the3
in the fifth century3
of the punic wars3
during the augustan age3
on the study of3
of cupid and psyche3
the history of poetry3
of the third book3
accession of tiberius to3
it was not his3
the body of the3
was an intimate friend3
with a good will3
one or two passages3
if they do not3
has been the subject3
almost all the great3
and a collection of3
the mind of rome3
in the third book3
poets of the republic3
enabled him to live3
and in spite of3
which he did not3
the decay of morals3
greater part of the3
the most part of3
the dialogue on oratory3
he was not a3
and the decay of3
that it was in3
is a witness to3
the fifth book of3
the jus trium liberorum3
of the circle of3
though it may be3
the idea that the3
in the latin tongue3
it had been in3
of his own work3
which had been the3
of the later greek3
first and second books3
the purity of his3
made him one of3
on the use of3
the age of tiberius3
knowledge of the world3
the highest and most3
write a history of3
gallic and civil wars3
but there is no3
but it must have3
from a very early3
of which he had3
has been well said3
of the christian era3
the severity of his3
burning of the city3
and in the second3
the era of the3
of life and manners3
had ceased to be3
which has made him3
of the sixth book3
one of the finest3
it is no wonder3
of the work is3
complete the list of3
members of the imperial3
of the next age3
nearly the whole of3
we are not surprised3
establishment of the empire3
in the shape of3
more than any other3
in the prologue to3
is not in itself3
the life of a3
in the preface to3
of the elder seneca3
lives of the caesars3
as far as we3
which had hitherto been3
of the elder pliny3
is the description of3
the great latin writers3
for near a century3
the serious business of3
he had not been3
the reputation of the3
so far as we3
a description of the3
decided in favour of3
of the works of3
of the literature of3
the reigns of nerva3
it ought to be3
to assign it to3
of the fifth century3
the style of his3
of the great roman3
all the offices of3
the consent of the3
of the decay of3
as we understand it3
in his work on3
the thought of the3
in the earlier books3
he had formed his3
of the language of3
of the laws of3
the gallic and civil3
the greatest of those3
it had become a3
that of all other3
this can hardly be3
it is that he3
the reason is to3
it has always been3
the middle ages he3
which the name of3
do not find that3
the spirit in which3
that it was not3
date of his work3
reasonable to suppose that3
had from the first3
the foundation of rome3
prose writers of the3
towards the close of3
to the destruction of3
the general decay of3
he complains of the3
in a state of3
as compared with that3
the didactic poem on3
the effect of his3
to the time of3
so far as they3
the excitement of the3
as a type of3
period of the decline3
from the foundation of3
on a charge of3
to be the greatest3
after the publication of3
was a native of3
which had once been3
nothing can be more3
most learned of the3
like those of the3
memorials of the old3
at the court of3
introduction of greek literature3
as part of the3
the names of the3
to be the first3
be gathered from the3
even if it were3
first rank of roman3
these two great men3
are the most important3
works have come down3
first book of his3
as in the opening3
the study of greek3
for the history of3
cicero and his brother3
in every department of3
a strong interest in3
which he could not3
be little doubt that3
to him by horace3
thinks it probable that3
the iliad and odyssey3
and as a rule3
an exhaustive treatment of3
give a short account3
with the love of3
the conduct of the3
by a later hand3
is in favour of3
what we should now3
the one thing that3
by far the greatest3
the point of view3
of his old age3
comes before us is3
that rome ever produced3
we are accustomed to3
in the later books3
the college of augurs3
the same is true3
that he should be3
is in the form3
in the pervigilium veneris3
the words of the3
than in any of3
the education of the3
by cicero in his3
a young man in3
second book of satires3
as if it had3
a new kind of3
a great deal of3
well as by his3
century of the republic3
is that of a3
among the upper classes3
some have supposed that3
were among the most3
the benefit of his3
with the single exception3
the incapacity of the3
reason is to be3
the form of literature3
a total absence of3
the life of the3
on the art of3
learn from the letters3
is true of his2
give rise to the2
that the power of2
and with it we2
fifty lines of the2
the rhetorical vices of2
a satire on the2
upwards of thirty years2
to belong to the2
prose writer of the2
the reception of the2
of his birth is2
was a sort of2
is careful not to2
the most ancient of2
must be considered a2
of them will be2
was anything but a2
of horace as a2
aloof from the court2
far as is known2
to the manner of2
free use of the2
of cicero to the2
must have been well2
be inferred from the2
of love was published2
scene of the dialogue2
he speaks of himself2
is to be sought2
borrowed from the greek2
the reigns of hadrian2
in the eastern provinces2
on the similes of2
publication of the art2
work of his predecessors2
century of the christian2
greatest orator of rome2
all kinds of literature2
on the acta diurna2
his most celebrated poem2
the favoured lover of2
himself to the duties2
facta et dicta memorabilia2
of virgil in its2
other writer shall we2
of the signs of2
have supposed that the2
had not yet come2
belongs to this epoch2
off abruptly in the2
to tell the story2
and part of the2
he had little or2
but if from the2
of cato and the2
that his father was2
in greek or latin2
the terms in which2
he caused himself to2
on the dignity of2
as the flower of2
spondee in the last2
continued to pour forth2
in the third ode2
even in greek poetry2
what he considers the2
in his own special2
referred to by quintilian2
even as early as2
enabled him to overcome2
him to celebrate the2
with which he has2
falls far short of2
subjects from the greek2
the last book of2
additional details on the2
led him to wish2
the interest of the2
with a total absence2
but in the general2
much credit by his2
be seen from this2
are preserved by cicero2
was a devoted admirer2
thought that in the2
the capital and the2
was written in his2
though it is possible2
the student is referred2
by the elder seneca2
idea of the value2
of his great speeches2
whose works have come2
to be referred the2
questions or subjects for2
to that of varro2
of a large number2
appearance in literature of2
at this time the2
it may interest the2
of great scope and2
which it should be2
command of the emperor2
continued on the same2
the effects of this2
are the most renowned2
the temple of janus2
of thought and feeling2
the principles of rhetoric2
scriptas luci misimus aeli2
to it ever since2
a vital force of2
and was the most2
state of philosophical and2
of the poetic gift2
did not scruple to2
of the fables of2
the partial revival of2
he stood in the2
based on that of2
from his earliest years2
to the care of2
have helped him in2
is at the same2
in other respects he2
to speak of him2
legitimate place among the2
to give up the2
by a sort of2
orator except as a2
to find out the2
all his life in2
to the state religion2
should now call the2
degree exceeding that of2
is no wonder if2
at all times to2
in the first ten2
at once asked for2
legends connected with virgil2
many of the precepts2
did not err in2
we should now call2
divisions of the subject2
that it was no2
be passed over in2
of the old testament2
naturally turned rather to2
from the list of2
which is not only2
literature up to his2
of his younger friends2
of the hexameter is2
as a man who2
the twenty books of2
are accompanied by other2
there is little to2
are to a great2
have already had occasion2
of which several fragments2
in tragedy and comedy2
as it is possible2
the limits of the2
by the works of2
on the earliest remains2
given rise to the2
the great names of2
uttered in the senate2
he did not know2
the life of horace2
by the establishment of2
the field of battle2
no other writer shall2
to the verge of2
his intimate friendship with2
be said to be2
absorbing interest of the2
instances of this are2
was less of the2
of the old annalists2
translation of the odyssey2
of cicero as the2
took the first place2
when he was a2
of the senate and2
the masterly sketch of2
to the contemplation of2
the rich colouring of2
part of the book2
they had all the2
they will be found2
it was necessary to2
of the function of2
philosophical and religious thought2
pieces by the same2
the reaction from the2
of terence and the2
are attributed to him2
was born at the2
in which he describes2
other forms of the2
when we remember that2
a history of latin2
and it is this2
the extension of the2
the work of cicero2
the dialogue de oratoribus2
on the civil wars2
perhaps the most beautiful2
to enlighten their minds2
would be a priceless2
the language in which2
which it would be2
any other ancient author2
balance of probability is2
it is the only2
two great names of2
masterly sketch of the2
were more familiar than2
when they were not2
thus laid the foundation2
of the book gives2
and in many cases2
marks the highest point2
civil war broke out2
and even down to2
a little further on2
have declared that his2
the only instance in2
light they throw on2
is full of the2
whole range of the2
the finer susceptibilities of2
and to be the2
final o in latin2
the contemplation of the2
first two books were2
in the eighteenth century2
et doctus cantare catullum2
that had to be2
nil actum credens dum2
how far is this2
of the greek hexameter2
he had at first2
the writings of the2
between rome and hannibal2
a nation of grammarians2
once the earliest and2
the title of poet2
but in the earlier2
later years of augustus2
the administrator of the2
to be by a2
of the man that2
the death of sulla2
to this may be2
born in the year2
he could hardly have2
out of deference to2
that of the later2
but some of his2
is the most striking2
early epic and tragedy2
of the earlier and2
of the higher education2
reminds one of the2
dum quid superesset agendum2
the fondness of a2
of life and conduct2
the follies and vices2
of our lower house2
acta diurna and acta2
from the study of2
suggested by the history2
the great mass of2
still less likely to2
and turned to the2
so far relaxed the2
language was not yet2
any belief in their2
the other italian nationalities2
which he wrote in2
language of common life2
is unique in the2
the capture of rome2
somewhat later we find2
was lost in the2
be found in teuffel2
of the national mind2
points in which the2
in the rhetorical schools2
announced his intention of2
he might have read2
which had so long2
with the enthusiasm of2
greater part of which2
and philosophy it had2
compared with any of2
on the wider one2
study of the aeneid2
of the whole collection2
a better versifier than2
do not seem to2
of the schools of2
morality of his plays2
is the most original2
of the precepts of2
he paved the way2
the different kinds of2
were often held at2
ruler of the empire2
nothing can give a2
he is not a2
with his own hand2
the middle and new2
of all latin poets2
to come forward as2
they are written in2
which is expressed by2
inclined to form a2
the day of death2
brought to perfection by2
as late as b2
treatment of the metre2
the younger scipio and2
for their own sake2
of the chief roman2
brought to light in2
imagination of the world2
first acquaintance with the2
exact date is uncertain2
find in him the2
on a footing of2
of the roman poets2
interesting as showing the2
of alliteration in latin2
and of which the2
to account for the2
the influence of virgil2
the rise of a2
great importance in the2
early in the present2
first appearance of hortensius2
his original contribution to2
and with every variety2
cannot fail to strike2
on the beginnings of2
a most valuable storehouse2
in the introduction to2
inner circle of the2
a strong admiration for2
may regret that time2
latin literature of the2
the greek and roman2
veterum historicorum romanorum relliquiae2
namque erit ille mihi2
of this strange poem2
between the first and2
the earliest period to2
argutos inter strepere anser2
of a new school2
under the heads of2
even at the time2
a masterpiece of construction2
by the hand of2
the last age of2
must be distinguished from2
where one of the2
was also much in2
and it is astonishing2
in the year which2
the idol of the2
also mentioned as the2
it is only when2
the chief writers of2
no less than his2
in a similar manner2
ne minus senatoribus c2
but they did not2
odyssey into saturnian verse2
in the name of2
a truer picture of2
it is the glory2
had been accused of2
thirty years of the2
have been familiar with2
of the rise of2
the expense of the2
his careful study of2
in this he was2
of his own art2
it is also possible2
the true end of2
letters to his brother2
is impossible to ascertain2
in the civil war2
of the tenth satire2
in the sixth eclogue2
of latin literature which2
of the elder cato2
and is well worth2
the source of the2
of his own travels2
of the same book2
centuries after his death2
he was a master2
the thyestes of varius2
the excellences of his2
that he himself had2
publication of the first2
use of alliteration in2
art and letters in2
in such a way2
culmination of latin poetry2
both attained the highest2
tener nostris ab ovilibus2
by no means certain2
had the author lived2
the absence of any2
thought to be a2
much to be regretted2
this new form of2
lived on terms of2
seneca was one of2
we can judge he2
in his preface to2
from the sphere of2
in the iliad and2
it would be hard2
side of the picture2
of his daughter tullia2
does not follow that2
this kind of writing2
he addressed himself to2
history of the mimus2
his oratory is described2
which the romans were2
from the well of2
or at least to2
greek colonies in italy2
and a power of2
cicero at the head2
at once the most2
they are such as2
before the death of2
that his name became2
a series of brilliant2
the first century before2
and in the de2
quite in accordance with2
juvenal is the most2
in the character of2
a number of stories2
of the year he2
it has been already2
it was only by2
in the treatise de2
others that it is2
of a new and2
the excellence of his2
the authority of the2
to be false to2
a general survey of2
he is careful not2
is the first to2
that comes before us2
grammarians of less note2
made on the world2
the position of an2
comparable to that of2
is at his best2
idea of the state2
the arts of peace2
the consulship of cicero2
we see that the2
the third ode of2
book of the annals2
and in harmony with2
much in his poetical2
as the poet of2
it is nothing but2
be regarded as the2
writers of the ciceronian2
of fronto and apuleius2
account of his death2
of the single combat2
letters in the fourth2
it is not till2
when at last he2
the reader should consult2
with the advance of2
we have no means2
pursued with the greatest2
of the civil law2
the young man about2
the daily life of2
traditions of the republic2
a grander field for2
and in a later2
by horace in his2
the drop from the2
philosophy of the de2
the lines with which2
may be divided into2
but as he never2
from a literary point2
in the lines which2
it is only in2
elsewhere than at rome2
was noted for the2
of the few men2
it is well known2
may be inferred from2
which of the two2
is it possible to2
may be gathered from2
so many writers of2
actum credens dum quid2
books of commentaries on2
quite different from the2
all his wealth to2
own life and times2
were to a great2
after the conquest of2
result would have been2
in an age when2
him from the list2
is difficult to see2
that they were not2
must not forget the2
the schools of athens2
epic poem on the2
the fashion among the2
little more than names2
that it may well2
rest satisfied with the2
a latin version of2
are also attributed to2
the development of roman2
both in prose and2
a rich vein of2
rise out of the2
is well worth reading2
pronounced in favour of2
which could only be2
and almost all the2
a small part of2
of the great latin2
brought to rome by2
and the employment of2
he was a great2
tragedies and one praetexta2
latin translation of the2
which for ten years2
spirit in which it2
some additional details on2
huiusmodi paucas poetae reperiunt2
of a very different2
the reign of the2
freer use of the2
the theory and practice2
as well known as2
bears all the marks2
it is much to2
oceani linquens aurora cubile2
writing of the period2
have been glad to2
the year after his2
of the grown man2
point of view as2
to be able to2
the first order it2
to the national character2
full as it is2
new comedy of athens2
the first appearance of2
in which they are2
thesis of the foot2
is alluded to by2
out of which the2
by a few years2
after the time of2
penetrated with the spirit2
passage in one of2
of his conclusions are2
the command of the2
had once been the2
work of a writer2
at the root of2
of the modern style2
and compare them with2
the main line of2
by the literary class2
and the de republica2
a good deal with2
he applies his principle2
clibanato et piperato consulibus2
left no room for2
head of all the2
work on the subject2
it is in this2
imitation of greek models2
dissatisfied with his own2
it was impossible to2
from the charge of2
existence of the gods2
conceived the plan of2
than anything else in2
of which every other2
due to the influence2
of the metre is2
is the death of2
to translate portions of2
the former of which2
a legitimate place among2
the de optimo genere2
to the effects of2
and that he had2
in the latin language2
that he lived in2
in the fifth and2
the opening lines of2
as the head of2
be allowed to see2
that the art of2
in their present form2
many of them are2
said to be a2
were not calculated to2
i remind you of2
the art of rhetoric2
scattered through his works2
we are informed that2
were part of his2
for a century after2
and beyond doubt he2
as he himself tells2
in the next generation2
into a kind of2
the splendour of the2
of society from the2
the balance of probability2
of this period is2
the great men who2
two passages from the2
on the signification of2
but for this there2
until after his death2
is the last of2
it was written in2
considered the prince of2
his life and character2
of which he is2
he tells us that2
of the augustan writers2
a much more finished2
senatus consultum de bacchanalibus2
with the greatest zeal2
on all hands to2
is the first of2
on the story of2
is like that of2
he is the most2
made the occasion for2
in which the young2
the tone of the2
the only one of2
to which reference is2
claim to be a2
to him the greatest2
scientific writers we possess2
the death of a2
on the fact that2
such as thou art2
almost for the first2
birth and parentage of2
hundred lines in all2
which he gives a2
nostris ab ovilibus imbuet2
most eminent and copious2
any of the other2
the philosophy of greece2
seems to have indulged2
was based on the2
at a remote period2
that on the death2
the accession of vespasian2
the advice of cornutus2
which is the most2
side of the new2
in the same track2
regards the date of2
the manly gown he2
the jealousy of nero2
he had delivered as2
his death in b2
the letters to lucilius2
he continued to pour2
both prose and verse2
within the sphere of2
the liquid lapse of2
on the style of2
the simple and the2
mother of the gods2
of aeneas in italy2
the cause of this2
most interesting feature in2
in the philosophy of2
life and personality of2
his attitude towards the2
the number of the2
this style of composition2
from which we may2
the love of nature2
and personality of the2
the works of two2
is the most distinguished2
than any other in2
rose to the praetorship2
are full of a2
the battle of the2
of art and science2
to the rules of2
to have merited the2
been a friend of2
the death of burrus2
high opinion of their2
hither and thither over2
his character is his2
the glory of the2
and letters in the2
the best of his2
and will not be2
but there can be2
isti meo fratri carolo2
the four books of2
he had written the2
of letters at rome2
list of his philosophical2
even when they were2
first century before christ2
portion of the whole2
those of his own2
the contempt of letters2
the most favourable light2
humani nihil a me2
under his name are2
they are no longer2
is in the character2
of a different sort2
an attack upon the2
has been called the2
from a passage in2
with the events of2
that of plautus himself2
repetition of the same2
is the reverse of2
the expression of his2
his de natura deorum2
to do with the2
the friend of the2
of letters on the2
and purity of diction2
it was at the2
one of whose treatises2
for the expression of2
to themselves as to2
the whole the most2
has been already said2
on the same scale2
of the best known2
the talent of the2
is impossible to say2
the close of this2
the attic and asiatic2
he was bidden to2
after his return to2
he has become the2
ceased to have any2
pleasing description in the2
the best education that2
the roman colony of2
just enabled him to2
him on account of2
nature of the man2
we are told by2
may seem to us2
the few fragments of2
to them by the2
accustomed to associate with2
the most interesting and2
of the national religion2
to the greatness of2
in their admiration of2
the emperor and his2
primitive culture of latium2
were of a lighter2
the genius of latin2
to the effect that2
a testimony to the2
of the danube and2
prisoner of war from2
the epistolae ad familiares2
and policy of augustus2
seems to be of2
preface he speaks of2
the death of gracchus2
of the labours of2
a knowledge of the2
had little or no2
of perseus and andromeda2
the conclusion that the2
know not exactly when2
of our own day2
the free use of2
of nouns of the2
that of any other2
there are at least2
did not become a2
in the generation which2
as it is now2
in the sixteenth century2
not in the least2
total absence of the2
to point to the2
own day as he2
we possess in an2
nothing else to do2
did not care to2
is after all a2
inconsiderable as compared with2
part of a man2
on the thought of2
gave himself up to2
point in which he2
and it is in2
is just this quality2
break after the fourth2
the most successful of2
now the language of2
the last century of2
we might call the2
works of the two2
the main current of2
to care for the2
in his younger days2
we are surprised to2
observe the care with2
is based on a2
of horace and virgil2
the most distinguished of2
to which as a2
his return to rome2
as a collection of2
he never speaks of2
he was content to2
to a later period2
which in the annals2
erit ille mihi semper2
to such a man2
it is true this2
fleet stationed at misenum2
the same time they2
of the later years2
a few critical remarks2
of the results of2
from the hand of2
and the description of2
the fall of carthage2
the volume of poems2
it is from the2
he was given to2
one generation to another2
did not go beyond2
of the former class2
the generation which immediately2
the changes on the2
the latter had been2
down the wrath of2
on points like these2
an example of this2
of the same thing2
that they are all2
was the name of2
one object was to2
a level with the2
end of the couplet2
aeneid are so numerous2
reason to suppose that2
gave public lectures on2
average specimen of the2
the picture of the2
of the old aristocracy2
passed his life in2
the importation of a2
the same time a2
that even in the2
the shores of the2
and second books of2
the labours of ritschl2
a hundred and fifty2
ad te scriptas luci2
with that of lucan2
work of this period2
purity of his life2
nothing in all latin2
after his accession to2
the series of biographies2
the two former were2
of his more popular2
is almost the only2
is not easy to2
history of the romans2
compare them with the2
like so many of2
that had ever been2
to be rid of2
the writers on applied2
for which they were2
the work of this2
fashion of the day2
is no doubt that2
third and fourth centuries2
a digest of the2
only now beginning to2
we have already had2
and are perhaps the2
retired from public life2
written soon after the2
from the very first2
by which we can2
it is the same2
for he had a2
it is the work2
that of the best2
the monotony of the2
the gradual decline of2
the letters of pliny2
year of the reign2
it is in these2
of commentaries on the2
a large mass of2
that have reached us2
it is in his2
give a succinct analysis2
merits and defects of2
his attitude towards his2
be ranked among the2
great orators of the2
written in his old2
in the early period2
for a man to2
has res ad te2
is more likely to2
struck at the root2
difficult to see how2
of a roman audience2
of the first eminence2
de republica and de2
we gather from a2
leaves nothing to the2
is the part of2
three books of odes2
greatly struck with the2
from the death of2
he had been led2
this may be added2
to each of the2
one of the circle2
of his plays are2
the last twenty years2
victrix causa deis placuit2
with the object of2
love of nature in2
of which it was2
the achievement of the2
the interval between the2
attained the highest renown2
close of this year2
prove that he was2
interea oceani linquens aurora2
offer a few critical2
the work may be2
of the most renowned2
theory and practice of2
a little on the2
the thesis of the2
a devoted admirer of2
did not disdain the2
to the roman mind2
of the empire itself2
staunch adherent of the2
was known to him2
he was ordered to2
in the extant fragments2
a matter of course2
have this in common2
the literary activity of2
of a correct and2
a deep affection for2
erotic and epic poets2
him in one of2
all his letters are2
find that he was2
and that there is2
not find in him2
he retired to a2
the actual speech of2
no ground for supposing2
he speaks of having2
his first campaign in2
of the byzantine empire2
of cicero and his2
as all his letters2
the natural development of2
enter on a new2