This is a table of type trigram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.
trigram | frequency |
---|---|
as well as | 648 |
one of the | 277 |
of the platonic | 250 |
that which is | 243 |
of his own | 235 |
in regard to | 216 |
that it is | 206 |
it is not | 200 |
he does not | 199 |
it is the | 189 |
of the two | 179 |
of the dialogue | 177 |
sokrates in the | 177 |
at the same | 170 |
the same time | 169 |
this is the | 169 |
there is no | 168 |
so far as | 164 |
the purpose of | 163 |
in the platonic | 161 |
in the same | 157 |
of the same | 156 |
so as to | 154 |
the doctrine of | 154 |
i do not | 153 |
to have been | 148 |
point of view | 146 |
the platonic sokrates | 144 |
is to be | 144 |
part of the | 142 |
in the republic | 138 |
of the soul | 138 |
according to the | 137 |
both of them | 136 |
more or less | 134 |
of the gods | 134 |
as to the | 133 |
that of the | 130 |
to be the | 129 |
but it is | 127 |
out of the | 122 |
in his own | 122 |
ought to be | 120 |
it is a | 120 |
the name of | 120 |
for the purpose | 119 |
the death of | 117 |
not to be | 116 |
one and the | 115 |
is not the | 113 |
in the first | 112 |
as far as | 111 |
the platonic dialogues | 111 |
on the other | 111 |
of the city | 110 |
in the gorgias | 110 |
in order to | 110 |
and the other | 107 |
on the contrary | 106 |
between the two | 106 |
in the protagoras | 105 |
of all the | 104 |
the just man | 104 |
all of them | 103 |
do not know | 103 |
the form of | 102 |
regard to the | 101 |
to be a | 101 |
and in the | 101 |
plato and aristotle | 99 |
of the kosmos | 99 |
as it is | 98 |
what is the | 98 |
and that the | 98 |
of the mind | 97 |
in reference to | 97 |
in which the | 96 |
that it was | 96 |
and the same | 95 |
pleasures and pains | 94 |
i have already | 93 |
good and evil | 92 |
would have been | 91 |
that there is | 91 |
in the dialogue | 89 |
with each other | 88 |
each of them | 88 |
each of these | 88 |
it to be | 88 |
in the mind | 87 |
we do not | 87 |
that they are | 87 |
the theory of | 86 |
it will be | 86 |
n ga r | 86 |
we read in | 85 |
the case of | 84 |
of the other | 83 |
in like manner | 83 |
he did not | 83 |
this is a | 83 |
of the most | 82 |
is the same | 82 |
of the world | 81 |
plato in the | 80 |
which it is | 80 |
to the gods | 80 |
the same as | 79 |
there is a | 77 |
of the republic | 76 |
that he is | 76 |
the mouth of | 75 |
the process of | 75 |
of sokrates in | 75 |
the time of | 75 |
well as the | 75 |
false persuasion of | 75 |
with a view | 74 |
of their own | 74 |
it would be | 74 |
portion of the | 73 |
the art of | 73 |
the mind of | 73 |
such is the | 72 |
the character of | 72 |
the work of | 72 |
dialogues of search | 72 |
character of the | 72 |
n me n | 71 |
to the same | 71 |
death of sokrates | 71 |
in this dialogue | 70 |
the opinion of | 70 |
which is the | 70 |
the idea of | 69 |
the cause of | 69 |
persuasion of knowledge | 68 |
reference to the | 68 |
appears to me | 68 |
as much as | 67 |
is the only | 67 |
the works of | 67 |
a view to | 67 |
if it were | 67 |
in which he | 66 |
to a certain | 66 |
that there are | 66 |
which he had | 66 |
years of age | 66 |
that he was | 66 |
points of view | 66 |
of plato in | 65 |
said to have | 65 |
ga r e | 65 |
of the dialogues | 65 |
in other words | 65 |
of the body | 64 |
does not know | 64 |
by plato in | 64 |
be able to | 64 |
and it is | 63 |
the part of | 63 |
the object of | 63 |
by sokrates in | 63 |
in the case | 63 |
in respect to | 63 |
laid down by | 63 |
into the mouth | 63 |
as if it | 63 |
with that of | 63 |
to his own | 63 |
to that which | 62 |
to each other | 62 |
is one of | 61 |
what it is | 61 |
me n ou | 61 |
those of the | 61 |
each of the | 61 |
it is in | 61 |
the treatise de | 61 |
in so far | 61 |
doctrine of the | 60 |
treatise de legibus | 60 |
we shall find | 60 |
the necessity of | 60 |
in order that | 60 |
but in the | 60 |
in my judgment | 60 |
of the first | 59 |
to the other | 59 |
the first of | 59 |
the power of | 59 |
the world of | 59 |
of that which | 59 |
purpose of the | 59 |
if it be | 59 |
is made to | 58 |
in his mind | 58 |
the life of | 58 |
it as a | 58 |
the other hand | 58 |
must have been | 58 |
n toi s | 58 |
is said to | 57 |
they do not | 57 |
the minds of | 57 |
the end of | 57 |
one of these | 57 |
it must be | 57 |
the man who | 57 |
the principle of | 56 |
of the human | 56 |
the number of | 56 |
at the time | 56 |
between sokrates and | 56 |
and of the | 56 |
as in the | 56 |
that he has | 56 |
the close of | 56 |
just and unjust | 55 |
on this point | 55 |
a part of | 55 |
which he is | 55 |
to say that | 55 |
a sort of | 55 |
of the three | 55 |
are to be | 55 |
of plato and | 55 |
he is not | 55 |
the essence of | 54 |
pleasure and pain | 54 |
to the mind | 54 |
for the sake | 54 |
the nature of | 54 |
close of the | 54 |
manner in which | 54 |
ga r a | 54 |
it does not | 54 |
the language of | 54 |
the sake of | 54 |
some of the | 54 |
in the second | 54 |
well as in | 54 |
as that which | 54 |
immortality of the | 53 |
seems to have | 53 |
of those who | 53 |
and to the | 53 |
the unjust man | 53 |
one of them | 53 |
read in the | 53 |
in other dialogues | 53 |
is in the | 53 |
to that of | 52 |
is not a | 52 |
after the death | 52 |
me n a | 52 |
so that the | 52 |
but this is | 52 |
most of the | 52 |
the fact that | 51 |
apart from the | 51 |
sokrates and plato | 51 |
many of the | 51 |
theory of the | 51 |
on the part | 51 |
far as it | 51 |
in one of | 51 |
the dialogues of | 50 |
to be found | 50 |
supposed to be | 50 |
it may be | 50 |
of all things | 50 |
there can be | 49 |
will not be | 49 |
the authority of | 49 |
it is to | 49 |
you do not | 49 |
any one else | 49 |
in the xenophontic | 48 |
to show that | 48 |
the pleasures of | 48 |
that he had | 48 |
remarks on the | 48 |
the knowledge of | 48 |
belonging to the | 48 |
the condition of | 48 |
a man of | 48 |
the immortality of | 48 |
the subject of | 48 |
the platonic apology | 48 |
to the platonic | 47 |
his own mind | 47 |
that which he | 47 |
a man who | 47 |
view of the | 47 |
forms or ideas | 47 |
they are not | 47 |
toi s a | 47 |
the beginning of | 47 |
of the sokratic | 47 |
which i have | 47 |
of the four | 47 |
it is only | 47 |
of these two | 47 |
them to be | 47 |
the whole of | 46 |
compared with the | 46 |
that a man | 46 |
ta me n | 46 |
way in which | 46 |
with reference to | 46 |
by the platonic | 46 |
of his life | 45 |
he would have | 45 |
of the one | 45 |
of the just | 45 |
pro s a | 45 |
that this is | 45 |
from the gods | 45 |
if he had | 45 |
different from the | 45 |
is the most | 45 |
as i have | 45 |
the age of | 45 |
of the citizens | 45 |
the human mind | 45 |
me n e | 45 |
which of the | 45 |
is different from | 45 |
and that he | 45 |
plato does not | 45 |
it was the | 45 |
if a man | 45 |
works of plato | 44 |
the time when | 44 |
to me n | 44 |
to all the | 44 |
in which it | 44 |
the rational soul | 44 |
which we read | 44 |
the way of | 44 |
can be no | 44 |
tells us that | 44 |
the existence of | 44 |
the love of | 44 |
of good and | 43 |
of what is | 43 |
to make the | 43 |
it cannot be | 43 |
that which we | 43 |
the use of | 43 |
by plato himself | 43 |
me n ga | 43 |
n te kai | 43 |
is that which | 43 |
in consequence of | 43 |
the xenophontic sokrates | 43 |
of the whole | 43 |
facts of sense | 42 |
on the subject | 42 |
any one of | 42 |
account of the | 42 |
than that of | 42 |
which he has | 42 |
well as to | 42 |
s me n | 42 |
as they are | 42 |
by means of | 42 |
the history of | 42 |
book of the | 42 |
which they are | 42 |
at the close | 41 |
to prove that | 41 |
under the name | 41 |
which is not | 41 |
can only be | 41 |
of its own | 41 |
in a manner | 41 |
of the philosopher | 41 |
by the gods | 41 |
the platonic republic | 41 |
a state of | 41 |
or at least | 41 |
at any rate | 41 |
tou s a | 41 |
men and women | 41 |
it in the | 41 |
the influence of | 41 |
one of his | 41 |
in the politikus | 41 |
in a certain | 41 |
of the greek | 40 |
such as are | 40 |
not at all | 40 |
in the last | 40 |
far as we | 40 |
the two sophists | 40 |
the alexandrine library | 40 |
the good and | 40 |
well as of | 40 |
to n e | 39 |
the definition of | 39 |
will be found | 39 |
of them are | 39 |
the meaning of | 39 |
from each other | 39 |
the point of | 39 |
half of the | 39 |
any of the | 39 |
true or false | 39 |
comparison of the | 39 |
knowledge of the | 39 |
is represented as | 39 |
the laws of | 39 |
could not be | 39 |
work of plato | 39 |
if there be | 39 |
of the good | 38 |
the means of | 38 |
from the other | 38 |
the value of | 38 |
as that of | 38 |
he was a | 38 |
parts of the | 38 |
conversation of sokrates | 38 |
at that time | 38 |
in spite of | 38 |
of sokrates and | 38 |
the sense of | 38 |
to do so | 38 |
it is necessary | 38 |
which are not | 38 |
in the city | 38 |
the protagorean doctrine | 38 |
to be in | 38 |
be found in | 38 |
condition of the | 38 |
the way in | 38 |
the one and | 38 |
of the individual | 37 |
in which they | 37 |
of the negative | 37 |
the science of | 37 |
it has been | 37 |
by reason of | 37 |
all that is | 37 |
there is nothing | 37 |
a matter of | 37 |
a string of | 37 |
that the gods | 37 |
as one of | 37 |
together with the | 37 |
declared to be | 37 |
in the kratylus | 37 |
that they were | 37 |
other platonic dialogues | 37 |
of the earth | 37 |
of the great | 37 |
to the first | 37 |
to be so | 36 |
a certain extent | 36 |
same as that | 36 |
belongs to the | 36 |
they did not | 36 |
nothing more than | 36 |
it is that | 36 |
which plato here | 36 |
to every one | 36 |
not in the | 36 |
the difference between | 36 |
in the way | 36 |
as soon as | 36 |
there was no | 36 |
in the symposion | 36 |
the xenophontic memorabilia | 36 |
that in the | 36 |
he must be | 35 |
also in the | 35 |
it is this | 35 |
there are two | 35 |
plato in his | 35 |
he will be | 35 |
and all the | 35 |
a man is | 35 |
and that which | 35 |
of the word | 35 |
which we have | 35 |
the measure of | 35 |
of the latter | 35 |
meaning of the | 35 |
passage of the | 35 |
the distinction between | 35 |
there are some | 35 |
in the treatise | 35 |
happiness of the | 35 |
a life of | 35 |
such as the | 35 |
as if they | 35 |
of the universe | 35 |
more than a | 35 |
but there is | 35 |
could not have | 35 |
of the general | 35 |
it appears to | 34 |
idea of good | 34 |
he will not | 34 |
this is not | 34 |
of the present | 34 |
in the apology | 34 |
the intelligible world | 34 |
the happiness of | 34 |
in harmony with | 34 |
to which the | 34 |
of plato himself | 34 |
may have been | 34 |
description of the | 34 |
to any one | 34 |
s te kai | 34 |
he could not | 34 |
in relation to | 34 |
and that it | 34 |
of them is | 34 |
given by plato | 34 |
by the same | 34 |
a variety of | 34 |
one or other | 34 |
of which he | 33 |
ought not to | 33 |
according to plato | 33 |
at the end | 33 |
because it is | 33 |
respect to the | 33 |
would not have | 33 |
plato and xenophon | 33 |
of the best | 33 |
theory of ideas | 33 |
all the other | 33 |
only to the | 33 |
the principles of | 33 |
of the elements | 33 |
in the world | 33 |
the word greek | 33 |
will be the | 33 |
himself in the | 33 |
given by sokrates | 33 |
well as by | 33 |
with respect to | 33 |
distinction between the | 33 |
the same manner | 33 |
by plato and | 33 |
sense of the | 33 |
of which the | 33 |
in this respect | 33 |
of sokrates with | 33 |
appears to have | 33 |
not know what | 33 |
the conversation of | 33 |
what is good | 32 |
that all the | 32 |
i think that | 32 |
that he did | 32 |
the two is | 32 |
dialogues of plato | 32 |
to n a | 32 |
the same thing | 32 |
or less of | 32 |
the course of | 32 |
as if he | 32 |
passage in the | 32 |
the state of | 32 |
to which he | 32 |
the hypothesis of | 32 |
from that which | 32 |
the facts of | 32 |
these are the | 32 |
on account of | 32 |
by plato as | 32 |
the judgment of | 32 |
or any other | 32 |
on the ground | 32 |
the human race | 32 |
in conjunction with | 32 |
he was not | 31 |
companions of sokrates | 31 |
end of the | 31 |
in the menon | 31 |
he is the | 31 |
we are not | 31 |
mind of the | 31 |
the four elements | 31 |
to be true | 31 |
as distinguished from | 31 |
at variance with | 31 |
the battle of | 31 |
or other of | 31 |
beginning of the | 31 |
have already observed | 31 |
of the guardians | 31 |
he ought to | 31 |
down to the | 31 |
the conditions of | 31 |
relative to the | 31 |
to those who | 31 |
both in the | 31 |
s ga r | 31 |
difference between the | 31 |
existence of the | 31 |
in the minds | 31 |
from the beginning | 31 |
of the agent | 31 |
the law of | 31 |
the manner in | 31 |
along with the | 31 |
in which plato | 31 |
we must not | 30 |
that he should | 30 |
in the form | 30 |
the function of | 30 |
the same in | 30 |
but what is | 30 |
pro s to | 30 |
the sensible world | 30 |
as the only | 30 |
the other two | 30 |
members of the | 30 |
by no means | 30 |
the reality of | 30 |
in this way | 30 |
between plato and | 30 |
to the city | 30 |
of the xenophontic | 30 |
sokrates of the | 30 |
te kai a | 30 |
unum non est | 30 |
to their own | 30 |
as to be | 30 |
we have seen | 30 |
is not to | 30 |
be said to | 30 |
common to all | 30 |
of plato to | 30 |
the father of | 30 |
the same with | 30 |
we shall see | 30 |
of the people | 30 |
the order of | 30 |
i think it | 30 |
if they were | 30 |
on the same | 30 |
the words of | 30 |
those who are | 30 |
pro s e | 30 |
in the other | 30 |
it is an | 30 |
to him by | 29 |
of this kind | 29 |
kai pro s | 29 |
which is in | 29 |
the analogy of | 29 |
and this is | 29 |
the false persuasion | 29 |
as it were | 29 |
what virtue is | 29 |
and that of | 29 |
this is an | 29 |
in the sense | 29 |
the argument of | 29 |
even in the | 29 |
and what is | 29 |
of the sophists | 29 |
by his own | 29 |
to use the | 29 |
the manner of | 29 |
that he does | 29 |
the wise man | 29 |
of pleasure and | 29 |
that there were | 29 |
the republic and | 29 |
that there was | 29 |
kai tou s | 29 |
the platonic critics | 29 |
the fact of | 29 |
the first and | 29 |
that of a | 29 |
the composition of | 29 |
the task of | 29 |
the man of | 29 |
in the universe | 29 |
and for the | 29 |
as compared with | 29 |
or to the | 29 |
it is therefore | 28 |
use of the | 28 |
a series of | 28 |
for this purpose | 28 |
found in the | 28 |
as a whole | 28 |
just as much | 28 |
this is what | 28 |
first of these | 28 |
of the community | 28 |
prior to the | 28 |
of which is | 28 |
they are to | 28 |
said to be | 28 |
the soul is | 28 |
order of the | 28 |
neither of them | 28 |
in the time | 28 |
more than one | 28 |
in the most | 28 |
so long as | 28 |
whether it be | 28 |
in place of | 28 |
of the public | 28 |
of the treatise | 28 |
of his dialogues | 28 |
he is a | 28 |
of the sun | 28 |
do you mean | 28 |
the causes of | 28 |
in all the | 28 |
the presence of | 28 |
be considered as | 28 |
a portion of | 28 |
of sokrates to | 28 |
with all the | 28 |
when they are | 28 |
platonic sokrates in | 28 |
authority of the | 28 |
the body of | 28 |
the best of | 28 |
that the just | 27 |
called upon to | 27 |
in the leges | 27 |
he seems to | 27 |
in the parmenides | 27 |
it is true | 27 |
none of them | 27 |
argument of sokrates | 27 |
not the same | 27 |
belong to the | 27 |
appears to be | 27 |
case of the | 27 |
pleasure or pain | 27 |
but he does | 27 |
we ought to | 27 |
those who have | 27 |
those who do | 27 |
every one else | 27 |
contrast between the | 27 |
ga r ou | 27 |
ideas or forms | 27 |
to which it | 27 |
with the same | 27 |
for it is | 27 |
it is plain | 27 |
and that they | 27 |
and with the | 27 |
and to have | 27 |
himself to be | 27 |
i agree with | 27 |
when a man | 27 |
with his own | 27 |
of the parmenides | 27 |
by every one | 27 |
the right of | 27 |
for the most | 27 |
just as the | 27 |
the historical sokrates | 27 |
the doctrines of | 27 |
though it is | 26 |
the question is | 26 |
it is impossible | 26 |
in the body | 26 |
any more than | 26 |
any one who | 26 |
much of the | 26 |
ens and non | 26 |
of the lawgiver | 26 |
that of plato | 26 |
we have no | 26 |
to see the | 26 |
the sentiment of | 26 |
from the same | 26 |
the philosophy of | 26 |
n kai to | 26 |
n kai a | 26 |
from his own | 26 |
the platonic ideas | 26 |
of the real | 26 |
this is true | 26 |
s tou s | 26 |
as we have | 26 |
he has not | 26 |
the business of | 26 |
as long as | 26 |
it was a | 26 |
that the platonic | 26 |
of each individual | 26 |
puts into the | 26 |
the same doctrine | 26 |
of his mind | 26 |
n kai e | 26 |
man is the | 26 |
it is for | 26 |
of the alexandrine | 26 |
they must be | 26 |
on one side | 26 |
in the latter | 26 |
in favour of | 26 |
that he will | 26 |
the attainment of | 26 |
we know that | 26 |
we read the | 26 |
of the second | 26 |
the dialogue called | 25 |
just man is | 25 |
was the first | 25 |
the gods and | 25 |
the spirit of | 25 |
say that the | 25 |
know how to | 25 |
the amount of | 25 |
the most important | 25 |
after his death | 25 |
we see that | 25 |
the two dialogues | 25 |
that which the | 25 |
to be an | 25 |
we are told | 25 |
the feeling of | 25 |
we have already | 25 |
must be a | 25 |
to those of | 25 |
to be spurious | 25 |
he says that | 25 |
of sokrates is | 25 |
much as possible | 25 |
many of his | 25 |
be allowed to | 25 |
of this dialogue | 25 |
the study of | 25 |
and at the | 25 |
of plato is | 25 |
when he was | 25 |
the testimony of | 25 |
are in the | 25 |
made by the | 25 |
science and health | 25 |
by the mind | 25 |
if any one | 25 |
nature of the | 25 |
do not think | 25 |
the government of | 25 |
he tells us | 25 |
that no man | 25 |
it will not | 25 |
state of the | 25 |
it is no | 25 |
would be a | 25 |
to be made | 25 |
with the platonic | 25 |
the region of | 25 |
there was a | 25 |
for the first | 25 |
if he be | 25 |
to illustrate the | 25 |
when it is | 25 |
we find the | 25 |
all the rest | 25 |
and will be | 25 |
me n o | 25 |
there must be | 25 |
as his own | 25 |
brought to bear | 25 |
by all the | 25 |
of the truth | 25 |
all the citizens | 24 |
the sokrates of | 24 |
training of the | 24 |
is described as | 24 |
harmony with the | 24 |
there be any | 24 |
like that of | 24 |
him to be | 24 |
the reasoning of | 24 |
far as they | 24 |
with which the | 24 |
his own name | 24 |
in its own | 24 |
it appears that | 24 |
applied to the | 24 |
and by the | 24 |
is the good | 24 |
his theory of | 24 |
must not be | 24 |
are the same | 24 |
of the athenian | 24 |
tou s e | 24 |
i see no | 24 |
the same subject | 24 |
which may be | 24 |
by plato to | 24 |
the first place | 24 |
pro s tou | 24 |
to kalo n | 24 |
essence of the | 24 |
than any other | 24 |
the treatise of | 24 |
as we know | 24 |
can never be | 24 |
we have the | 24 |
as we can | 24 |
the result of | 24 |
the most part | 24 |
is only a | 24 |
the protagorean formula | 24 |
of the question | 24 |
either of them | 24 |
to what is | 24 |
have been composed | 24 |
to be done | 24 |
the discourse of | 24 |
what is just | 24 |
as it was | 24 |
it ought to | 24 |
the platonic theory | 24 |
to be taken | 24 |
the opinions of | 23 |
to the second | 23 |
the same way | 23 |
glaukon and adeimantus | 23 |
founded on the | 23 |
to the general | 23 |
there is one | 23 |
the title of | 23 |
is not true | 23 |
the style of | 23 |
to the agent | 23 |
we may see | 23 |
are we to | 23 |
to the question | 23 |
to have a | 23 |
which the platonic | 23 |
he had been | 23 |
plato did not | 23 |
with that which | 23 |
so that he | 23 |
but as a | 23 |
greater or less | 23 |
distinguished from the | 23 |
s to n | 23 |
portions of the | 23 |
historians of philosophy | 23 |
with which he | 23 |
the view of | 23 |
of the athenians | 23 |
the platonic commonwealth | 23 |
to a great | 23 |
his edition of | 23 |
what are the | 23 |
to do wrong | 23 |
may be said | 23 |
not have been | 23 |
as contrasted with | 23 |
prayer and sacrifice | 23 |
of the protagoras | 23 |
be made to | 23 |
good or evil | 23 |
that justice is | 23 |
for his own | 23 |
mi n e | 23 |
given in the | 23 |
just or unjust | 23 |
opinion of the | 23 |
up to a | 23 |
we find in | 23 |
for him to | 23 |
good or bad | 23 |
himself to the | 23 |
far as i | 23 |
in the main | 23 |
that the two | 23 |
different from ens | 23 |
on which he | 23 |
might have been | 23 |
what he does | 22 |
minds of the | 22 |
ta toiau ta | 22 |
all things are | 22 |
him as a | 22 |
with those of | 22 |
of what he | 22 |
to be called | 22 |
of a man | 22 |
the example of | 22 |
the conception of | 22 |
the person who | 22 |
is the best | 22 |
the men of | 22 |
very different from | 22 |
one and many | 22 |
arithmetic and geometry | 22 |
us that the | 22 |
in the third | 22 |
generation and destruction | 22 |
side of the | 22 |
he may be | 22 |
sokrates and the | 22 |
that which plato | 22 |
him by the | 22 |
by those who | 22 |
doctrine of protagoras | 22 |
to make them | 22 |
ton me n | 22 |
the contrast between | 22 |
the doctrine which | 22 |
judgment of the | 22 |
in the former | 22 |
he has no | 22 |
the dialogue is | 22 |
do not agree | 22 |
upon this point | 22 |
the varieties of | 22 |
at the beginning | 22 |
it was not | 22 |
we are to | 22 |
when he is | 22 |
of the politikus | 22 |
under the same | 22 |
the ground of | 22 |
it is one | 22 |
this was the | 22 |
what is called | 22 |
in the dialogues | 22 |
more than the | 22 |
toi s e | 22 |
of the many | 22 |
to the one | 22 |
the maximum of | 22 |
among the most | 22 |
to the whole | 22 |
ascribed to sokrates | 22 |
the exercise of | 22 |
the limits of | 22 |
in common with | 22 |
the pleasure of | 22 |
we must remember | 22 |
distinct from the | 22 |
john stuart mill | 22 |
in this case | 21 |
all the three | 21 |
is just as | 21 |
are not the | 21 |
mind of plato | 21 |
either of the | 21 |
body and mind | 21 |
that those who | 21 |
the athenian public | 21 |
shall see that | 21 |
have been the | 21 |
to ga r | 21 |
in the history | 21 |
the just and | 21 |
with the most | 21 |
up to the | 21 |
of the poets | 21 |
in the one | 21 |
in this sense | 21 |
a branch of | 21 |
as having been | 21 |
laid down in | 21 |
and those who | 21 |
common to both | 21 |
that no one | 21 |
which it was | 21 |
put by sokrates | 21 |
and to be | 21 |
the names of | 21 |
but also the | 21 |
which they have | 21 |
to deal with | 21 |
both of the | 21 |
if he were | 21 |
the perfection of | 21 |
mode of life | 21 |
and the good | 21 |
ought to have | 21 |
in his note | 21 |
the philosopher is | 21 |
the performance of | 21 |
the practice of | 21 |
the friends of | 21 |
which we are | 21 |
form or idea | 21 |
he must have | 21 |
in his view | 21 |
or in the | 21 |
is in itself | 21 |
the contemplation of | 21 |
be in the | 21 |
mouth of sokrates | 21 |
the hands of | 21 |
of king nomos | 21 |
justice and injustice | 21 |
analogous to the | 21 |
s lo gois | 21 |
seem to have | 21 |
ga r o | 21 |
but they are | 21 |
up in the | 21 |
pro s ti | 21 |
of the rational | 21 |
upon his own | 21 |
a specimen of | 21 |
the writings of | 21 |
doctrine of sokrates | 21 |
and on the | 21 |
on the one | 21 |
but that the | 21 |
that he would | 21 |
art of rhetoric | 21 |
on his own | 21 |
that knowledge is | 21 |
does not admit | 21 |
to make out | 21 |
the phrase of | 21 |
the type of | 21 |
of the doctrine | 21 |
or the other | 21 |
to the body | 21 |
who do not | 21 |
one to the | 21 |
the force of | 21 |
edition of the | 21 |
he shall be | 21 |
the general public | 20 |
an assemblage of | 20 |
the first book | 20 |
attention to the | 20 |
by the name | 20 |
force of the | 20 |
that he could | 20 |
not less than | 20 |
him in the | 20 |
what we read | 20 |
that which they | 20 |
the generation of | 20 |
is in this | 20 |
no man can | 20 |
man who has | 20 |
the conduct of | 20 |
none of the | 20 |
to me to | 20 |
because they are | 20 |
of its consequences | 20 |
history of the | 20 |
declares to be | 20 |
of the state | 20 |
on the point | 20 |
arising from the | 20 |
is the measure | 20 |
of the different | 20 |
interest in the | 20 |
of human nature | 20 |
put into the | 20 |
of the absolute | 20 |
what is said | 20 |
it is so | 20 |
in this manner | 20 |
science or art | 20 |
appear to me | 20 |
says in the | 20 |
they will be | 20 |
type of character | 20 |
that the good | 20 |
he was the | 20 |
have been a | 20 |
analogy of the | 20 |
explanation of the | 20 |
i am not | 20 |
was one of | 20 |
kai toi s | 20 |
which he himself | 20 |
his own ignorance | 20 |
world of sense | 20 |
the only one | 20 |
conception of the | 20 |
to the good | 20 |
out of his | 20 |
one who has | 20 |
knowledge of good | 20 |
functions of the | 20 |
in the public | 20 |
but when we | 20 |
what he says | 20 |
to be able | 20 |
down by sokrates | 20 |
according to their | 20 |
the fear of | 20 |
is just and | 20 |
there will be | 20 |
a certain point | 20 |
each of which | 20 |
that the first | 20 |
far from being | 20 |
of the divine | 20 |
the first time | 20 |
function of the | 20 |
may be made | 20 |
contrasted with the | 20 |
one among the | 20 |
the habit of | 20 |
such are the | 20 |
the same general | 20 |
form of the | 20 |
the last of | 20 |
both the two | 20 |
at different times | 20 |
to bear upon | 20 |
the good of | 20 |
the soul of | 20 |
of all other | 20 |
some of them | 20 |
would probably have | 20 |
of the former | 20 |
inconsistent with the | 20 |
out of which | 20 |
soul or mind | 19 |
so that it | 19 |
in the name | 19 |
one or more | 19 |
and the most | 19 |
of these three | 19 |
between him and | 19 |
kai ga r | 19 |
you are not | 19 |
the lifetime of | 19 |
the author of | 19 |
peculiar to himself | 19 |
come to the | 19 |
not agree with | 19 |
dionysius of halikarnassus | 19 |
must remember that | 19 |
different points of | 19 |
friends of forms | 19 |
could have been | 19 |
reasoning of sokrates | 19 |
in the kriton | 19 |
the eyes of | 19 |
says that the | 19 |
by which he | 19 |
we find that | 19 |
is the first | 19 |
do not admit | 19 |
the only way | 19 |
kai to n | 19 |
if this be | 19 |
life of the | 19 |
of one of | 19 |
and which he | 19 |
set forth in | 19 |
the herakleitean theory | 19 |
is intended to | 19 |
all the platonic | 19 |
in a way | 19 |
did not know | 19 |
which had been | 19 |
of the commonwealth | 19 |
the position of | 19 |
during the lifetime | 19 |
in the present | 19 |
it as an | 19 |
in respect of | 19 |
of a few | 19 |
far as to | 19 |
they are the | 19 |
a man has | 19 |
the basis of | 19 |
we must recollect | 19 |
the platonic parmenides | 19 |
n tou to | 19 |
only as a | 19 |
the truth of | 19 |
true and false | 19 |
and which is | 19 |
be applied to | 19 |
are not to | 19 |
of any one | 19 |
of pleasures and | 19 |
the same to | 19 |
the absence of | 19 |
power of the | 19 |
for my part | 19 |
whether it is | 19 |
man is a | 19 |
the search for | 19 |
the maintenance of | 19 |
is the cause | 19 |
the evidence of | 19 |
will not hold | 19 |
that he must | 19 |
and character of | 19 |
capable of being | 19 |
is one who | 19 |
order that the | 19 |
sokrates is made | 19 |
a knowledge of | 19 |
here given by | 19 |
view to the | 19 |
a remarkable passage | 19 |
persons of the | 19 |
we turn to | 19 |
the effect of | 19 |
in the human | 19 |
what is really | 19 |
not merely in | 19 |
they are all | 19 |
from the first | 19 |
in his commentary | 19 |
the same opinion | 19 |
a young man | 19 |
a time when | 19 |
value of the | 19 |
such a man | 19 |
as a matter | 19 |
toi s lo | 19 |
it had been | 19 |
of the theory | 19 |
of such a | 19 |
of which it | 19 |
he professes to | 19 |
to the last | 19 |
is common to | 19 |
good and the | 19 |
and pains of | 19 |
as belonging to | 19 |
and must be | 19 |
the production of | 19 |
yet it is | 19 |
with the other | 19 |
kai tou to | 19 |
it is neither | 19 |
as a means | 19 |
what sort of | 19 |
think that the | 19 |
is among the | 19 |
now it is | 19 |
place in the | 19 |
te ga r | 19 |
in their own | 19 |
the phenomena of | 19 |
dialogues of exposition | 19 |
is necessary to | 18 |
to be just | 18 |
he is said | 18 |
that the dialogue | 18 |
which does not | 18 |
and in a | 18 |
from that of | 18 |
when we read | 18 |
reason of its | 18 |
to prove the | 18 |
to the doctrine | 18 |
in such a | 18 |
be the same | 18 |
declares that the | 18 |
the rotations of | 18 |
is the one | 18 |
in the preceding | 18 |
and he is | 18 |
he is in | 18 |
the eleate in | 18 |
that there must | 18 |
ascribed to the | 18 |
tau ta e | 18 |
down in the | 18 |
first book of | 18 |
influence of the | 18 |
there may be | 18 |
than in the | 18 |
what is best | 18 |
of the protagorean | 18 |
every one of | 18 |
the son of | 18 |
it can be | 18 |
to find out | 18 |
of truth and | 18 |
to explain the | 18 |
is for the | 18 |
which must be | 18 |
is the object | 18 |
the sixth form | 18 |
would not be | 18 |
the formation of | 18 |
the one or | 18 |
such was the | 18 |
the one is | 18 |
to know the | 18 |
in need of | 18 |
rotations of the | 18 |
to be not | 18 |
only in the | 18 |
a man may | 18 |
name of the | 18 |
the charge of | 18 |
than any one | 18 |
that what is | 18 |
is good for | 18 |
or of the | 18 |
the agent himself | 18 |
he proceeds to | 18 |
this portion of | 18 |
but there are | 18 |
known to us | 18 |
are among the | 18 |
the exigencies of | 18 |
we find him | 18 |
every man is | 18 |
instead of being | 18 |
not merely the | 18 |
one of those | 18 |
since it is | 18 |
the real sokrates | 18 |
point of departure | 18 |
the friend of | 18 |
many of them | 18 |
that the mind | 18 |
rotation of the | 18 |
that which has | 18 |
in the following | 18 |
that he knows | 18 |
requiring to be | 18 |
the society of | 18 |
diogenes of apollonia | 18 |
nothing can be | 18 |
different from what | 18 |
as a man | 18 |
the solution of | 18 |
the list of | 18 |
of the works | 18 |
ga r au | 18 |
his own way | 18 |
assumed to be | 18 |
measure of all | 18 |
which is a | 18 |
we learn from | 18 |
in the centre | 18 |
but if he | 18 |
to the present | 18 |
substantially the same | 18 |
the megaric philosophers | 18 |
as the first | 18 |
what he is | 18 |
an aggregate of | 18 |
doctrine of plato | 18 |
but that he | 18 |
by saying that | 18 |
in any other | 18 |
see that the | 18 |
things which are | 18 |
history of greece | 18 |
his own individual | 18 |
the sokratic elenchus | 18 |
that they do | 18 |
a multitude of | 18 |
of the day | 18 |
question and answer | 18 |
relation to the | 18 |
the present day | 18 |
carried on by | 18 |
to the just | 18 |
a great degree | 18 |
to the best | 18 |
upon which the | 18 |
of them as | 18 |
that we are | 18 |
commentary on the | 18 |
scheme of life | 18 |
is supposed to | 18 |
the acquisition of | 18 |
are told that | 18 |
the possibility of | 18 |
of the case | 18 |
plato is not | 18 |
can be found | 18 |
but if we | 18 |
the mode of | 18 |
it is good | 18 |
be true or | 18 |
and when he | 18 |
to believe that | 18 |
to make a | 18 |
a man to | 18 |
is not so | 18 |
that the soul | 18 |
which he gives | 18 |
the delphian oracle | 18 |
no one can | 17 |
are said to | 17 |
in the beginning | 17 |
the first who | 17 |
no less than | 17 |
n lo gon | 17 |
the views of | 17 |
the pleasures and | 17 |
not to the | 17 |
by which it | 17 |
the hippias major | 17 |
and as a | 17 |
it to the | 17 |
under the influence | 17 |
as a general | 17 |
the sophist is | 17 |
as a teacher | 17 |
do not see | 17 |
to be of | 17 |
that the sophists | 17 |
eleate in the | 17 |
of the name | 17 |
belief in the | 17 |
satisfied with the | 17 |
a passage in | 17 |
the duties of | 17 |
objections against the | 17 |
for the same | 17 |
justice and temperance | 17 |
of the gorgias | 17 |
appeal to the | 17 |
words of the | 17 |
what has been | 17 |
plato in this | 17 |
all the four | 17 |
between ens and | 17 |
in a few | 17 |
that he can | 17 |
comparison with the | 17 |
one or the | 17 |
cause of the | 17 |
that every man | 17 |
to do the | 17 |
the case is | 17 |
against the platonic | 17 |
had in his | 17 |
is declared to | 17 |
the duty of | 17 |
they ought to | 17 |
there is much | 17 |
place of the | 17 |
must be made | 17 |
must also be | 17 |
find in the | 17 |
answer to the | 17 |
subject and object | 17 |
the same age | 17 |
there is an | 17 |
reason of the | 17 |
and the individual | 17 |
pronounced to be | 17 |
objects of sense | 17 |
but we must | 17 |
of true and | 17 |
discourse of sokrates | 17 |
according to his | 17 |
all men are | 17 |
true and pure | 17 |
and his own | 17 |
and do not | 17 |
system of logic | 17 |
in point of | 17 |
is sensible perception | 17 |
of the beautiful | 17 |
it is also | 17 |
the opposite of | 17 |
the guidance of | 17 |
the platonic writings | 17 |
he would not | 17 |
but for the | 17 |
from the one | 17 |
to a few | 17 |
the first part | 17 |
of one who | 17 |
we cannot say | 17 |
in the earlier | 17 |
be compared with | 17 |
and does not | 17 |
the human body | 17 |
mary baker eddy | 17 |
the lover of | 17 |
to be studied | 17 |
for all the | 17 |
cause of all | 17 |
the very same | 17 |
insisted on by | 17 |
by sokrates to | 17 |
which of them | 17 |
to which they | 17 |
the house of | 17 |
as conceived by | 17 |
in the next | 17 |
in which sokrates | 17 |
the want of | 17 |
for believing that | 17 |
to him as | 17 |
cognition of cognition | 17 |
the dialogue as | 17 |
better than the | 17 |
of the sophist | 17 |
back to the | 17 |
what is it | 17 |
he may have | 17 |
must have a | 17 |
something different from | 17 |
intended by plato | 17 |
it would have | 17 |
to keep up | 17 |
it is by | 17 |
is a very | 17 |
the true philosopher | 17 |
be regarded as | 17 |
not merely to | 17 |
out of sight | 17 |
the human soul | 17 |
of the leges | 17 |
in the manner | 17 |
of the laws | 17 |
that we have | 17 |
set forth by | 17 |
phenomenal and relative | 17 |
as if the | 17 |
different from that | 17 |
seems to be | 17 |
the rest of | 17 |
instead of the | 17 |
of the author | 17 |
if we are | 17 |
that in which | 17 |
kai nu n | 17 |
there are no | 17 |
and not to | 17 |
his commentary on | 17 |
are required to | 17 |
sokrates does not | 16 |
of the others | 16 |
is not merely | 16 |
part of it | 16 |
unworthy of plato | 16 |
sight and hearing | 16 |
the platonic and | 16 |
may not be | 16 |
in each of | 16 |
of the man | 16 |
that pleasure is | 16 |
author of the | 16 |
the teaching of | 16 |
the feelings of | 16 |
to the public | 16 |
to the end | 16 |
no one will | 16 |
not to know | 16 |
but also in | 16 |
not so much | 16 |
is at the | 16 |
that i am | 16 |
the platonic protagoras | 16 |
name of sokrates | 16 |
he has the | 16 |
and that there | 16 |
an object of | 16 |
the objects of | 16 |
the medical art | 16 |
what is that | 16 |
other companions of | 16 |
turn to the | 16 |
what i have | 16 |
specimen of the | 16 |
of it in | 16 |
n tai s | 16 |
not the less | 16 |
is relative to | 16 |
that plato had | 16 |
of the universal | 16 |
must recollect that | 16 |
distribution of the | 16 |
the possession of | 16 |
it with the | 16 |
for the body | 16 |
questions of sokrates | 16 |
a teacher of | 16 |
only by the | 16 |
among all the | 16 |
o n te | 16 |
the xenophontic symposion | 16 |
composed by plato | 16 |
gold and silver | 16 |
by any one | 16 |
to the common | 16 |
and variety of | 16 |
those of plato | 16 |
in a different | 16 |
and from the | 16 |
corresponding to the | 16 |
variety of the | 16 |
for that reason | 16 |
the tone of | 16 |
of the multitude | 16 |
consistent with the | 16 |
which plato has | 16 |
of the original | 16 |
the summit of | 16 |
this point of | 16 |
is in a | 16 |
the exclusion of | 16 |
is plain that | 16 |
is the principle | 16 |
by the xenophontic | 16 |
of the time | 16 |
the light of | 16 |
the head of | 16 |
on the whole | 16 |
then proceeds to | 16 |
search for truth | 16 |
the privilege of | 16 |
but he is | 16 |
seems to me | 16 |
the discussion of | 16 |
at the bottom | 16 |
may be true | 16 |
the commencement of | 16 |
me n kai | 16 |
the education of | 16 |
not admit the | 16 |
in preference to | 16 |
to be known | 16 |
for a man | 16 |
of the words | 16 |
the matter of | 16 |
agree with him | 16 |
neither good nor | 16 |
this doctrine of | 16 |
the antithesis between | 16 |
my history of | 16 |
pro s ta | 16 |
ta s a | 16 |
characteristic of the | 16 |
aristotle in the | 16 |
not only the | 16 |
both to the | 16 |
of the respondent | 16 |
world of ideas | 16 |
he wishes to | 16 |
illustrated by the | 16 |
the functions of | 16 |
in a state | 16 |
in the language | 16 |
in the opinion | 16 |
kata phu sin | 16 |
to know what | 16 |
in modern times | 16 |
state of mind | 16 |
by sokrates himself | 16 |
in the highest | 16 |
to belong to | 16 |
will thus be | 16 |
is that of | 16 |
them in the | 16 |
of things terrible | 16 |
of every one | 16 |
we come to | 16 |
the passage of | 16 |
is true of | 16 |
of the problem | 16 |
but does not | 16 |
before the death | 16 |
te kai e | 16 |
the statement of | 16 |
to n o | 16 |
the genius of | 16 |
the mind is | 16 |
are such as | 16 |
the platonic dialogue | 16 |
to go through | 16 |
conjunction with the | 16 |
that the same | 16 |
all of the | 16 |
along with it | 16 |
as i can | 16 |
whether virtue is | 16 |
when he has | 16 |
but i do | 16 |
principle of the | 16 |
in the two | 16 |
here we have | 16 |
they would be | 16 |
ga r kai | 16 |
dia tau ta | 16 |
and each of | 15 |
n de a | 15 |
on both sides | 15 |
with the doctrine | 15 |
is a man | 15 |
virtue is teachable | 15 |
the first to | 15 |
as good as | 15 |
on this subject | 15 |
man who is | 15 |
and as the | 15 |
is not always | 15 |
those which are | 15 |
but also to | 15 |
of each other | 15 |
the real and | 15 |
considered as a | 15 |
may be seen | 15 |
in the hippias | 15 |
from the fact | 15 |
the platonic compositions | 15 |
arises from the | 15 |
of the argument | 15 |
views of plato | 15 |
exposition of the | 15 |
s lo gous | 15 |
he intends to | 15 |
with which it | 15 |
the contrary of | 15 |
plato seems to | 15 |
sequel to the | 15 |
is a measure | 15 |
indigent of the | 15 |
open to the | 15 |
of it is | 15 |
as to what | 15 |
will be a | 15 |
movements of the | 15 |
consequence of the | 15 |
to the former | 15 |
of the aristotelian | 15 |
of the entire | 15 |
is evident that | 15 |
both the one | 15 |
it is thus | 15 |
we may be | 15 |
as to make | 15 |
the other is | 15 |
as the great | 15 |
to know it | 15 |
that plato in | 15 |
shown to be | 15 |
we know from | 15 |
the genuineness of | 15 |
to the protagoras | 15 |
of life and | 15 |
most of his | 15 |
male and female | 15 |
and is not | 15 |
of good things | 15 |
know what virtue | 15 |
do not mean | 15 |
subject of the | 15 |
he had no | 15 |
reason and intelligence | 15 |
it is evident | 15 |
some of his | 15 |
n pro s | 15 |
it would not | 15 |
who did not | 15 |
on behalf of | 15 |
all that he | 15 |
about the gods | 15 |
contained in the | 15 |
the care of | 15 |
te kai ou | 15 |
have already remarked | 15 |
we look at | 15 |
of the thing | 15 |
the nocturnal council | 15 |
belonged to the | 15 |
at the age | 15 |
out by the | 15 |
a theory of | 15 |
during the last | 15 |
know what is | 15 |
the explanation of | 15 |
that is the | 15 |
be made out | 15 |
translation of the | 15 |
by a few | 15 |
of the intelligible | 15 |
first of the | 15 |
on which the | 15 |
the authenticity of | 15 |
for the time | 15 |
memorabilia of xenophon | 15 |
if they are | 15 |
of them will | 15 |
there are many | 15 |
of the special | 15 |
what is here | 15 |
over and above | 15 |
was not the | 15 |
motion and rest | 15 |
best of all | 15 |
truth and reality | 15 |
truth and falsehood | 15 |
either in the | 15 |
not know how | 15 |
if we look | 15 |
required to be | 15 |
that he may | 15 |
is there any | 15 |
but it was | 15 |
first and second | 15 |
that there can | 15 |
nothing in the | 15 |
in his dialogues | 15 |
that each of | 15 |
the gods are | 15 |
that i have | 15 |
the attic law | 15 |
speaks of the | 15 |
bearing on the | 15 |
to the most | 15 |
no ground for | 15 |
of both sexes | 15 |
of the subject | 15 |
the stimulus of | 15 |
to be good | 15 |
the reason of | 15 |
of the megaric | 15 |
the rhetorical teachers | 15 |
a source of | 15 |
in the process | 15 |
and those of | 15 |
part of his | 15 |
given by the | 15 |
the last half | 15 |
other of the | 15 |
he has been | 15 |
which have been | 15 |
can hardly be | 15 |
but if the | 15 |
of a good | 15 |
platonic theory of | 15 |
plato as a | 15 |
n and greek | 15 |
is it that | 15 |
by plato of | 15 |
it is possible | 15 |
the celestial bodies | 15 |
most of them | 15 |
to sokrates in | 15 |
is a good | 15 |
apart from all | 15 |
by the most | 15 |
is equivalent to | 15 |
books of the | 15 |
much the same | 15 |
of plato with | 15 |
the greatest of | 15 |
that plato did | 15 |
is only the | 15 |
is true that | 15 |
identical with the | 15 |
is good and | 15 |
they cannot be | 15 |
to his edition | 15 |
the platonic symposion | 15 |
it was in | 15 |
look at the | 15 |
the next place | 15 |
not one of | 15 |
lover of gain | 15 |
in the laws | 15 |
by way of | 15 |
ens or the | 15 |
variance with the | 15 |
we have now | 15 |
doctrine of herakleitus | 15 |
of the true | 15 |
before the dikastery | 15 |
any thing else | 15 |
though he does | 15 |
should not be | 15 |
the defence of | 15 |
one who is | 15 |
as of the | 15 |
being able to | 15 |
he had a | 15 |
away from the | 15 |
the intense pleasures | 15 |
in the timaeus | 14 |
character of sokrates | 14 |
far forth as | 14 |
to the individual | 14 |
the virtue of | 14 |
a number of | 14 |
none but the | 14 |
after a certain | 14 |
of my own | 14 |
on the platonic | 14 |
the efficacy of | 14 |
to para pan | 14 |
which ought to | 14 |
to the word | 14 |
as those of | 14 |
the world has | 14 |
was in the | 14 |
not for the | 14 |
man must be | 14 |
that the earth | 14 |
derived from the | 14 |
n po lin | 14 |
time of the | 14 |
how can the | 14 |
time when he | 14 |
it is remarkable | 14 |
in the right | 14 |
health and strength | 14 |
which all the | 14 |
end to be | 14 |
because of the | 14 |
analogy between the | 14 |
you think that | 14 |
of men and | 14 |
the most eminent | 14 |
if i am | 14 |
been able to | 14 |
the platonic school | 14 |
protagoras and prodikus | 14 |
the gods to | 14 |
to be brought | 14 |
the fact is | 14 |
life of plato | 14 |
of his master | 14 |
the face of | 14 |
is impossible to | 14 |
s and greek | 14 |
to which i | 14 |
it is very | 14 |
in this last | 14 |
we thus see | 14 |
which i shall | 14 |
so that they | 14 |
argument against the | 14 |
the passage in | 14 |
the same purpose | 14 |
justice consists in | 14 |
by the lawgiver | 14 |
with the rest | 14 |
in the presence | 14 |
a kind of | 14 |
that we can | 14 |
in the character | 14 |
if i were | 14 |
formation of the | 14 |
science of good | 14 |
he affirms that | 14 |
neither of these | 14 |
i confess that | 14 |
of human life | 14 |
the most powerful | 14 |
produced by the | 14 |
the relation between | 14 |
to di kaion | 14 |
in which all | 14 |
the second book | 14 |
of the thirty | 14 |
know what he | 14 |
to me that | 14 |
genuine works of | 14 |
and such as | 14 |
the belief that | 14 |
or a few | 14 |
he thinks that | 14 |
same to all | 14 |
doctrine of ideas | 14 |
appears in the | 14 |
brought to view | 14 |
of the hellenic | 14 |
the sons of | 14 |
of the poet | 14 |
can be said | 14 |
do not understand | 14 |
sokrates proceeds to | 14 |
that is not | 14 |
contrary to the | 14 |
to serve as | 14 |
was a man | 14 |
that all things | 14 |
which they had | 14 |
must therefore be | 14 |
do you think | 14 |
the platonic age | 14 |
that you are | 14 |
which belongs to | 14 |
of the demiurgus | 14 |
but to be | 14 |
but in regard | 14 |
to be understood | 14 |
the subject is | 14 |
lifetime of sokrates | 14 |
he declares that | 14 |
upon him by | 14 |
by the word | 14 |
to him the | 14 |
the fourth and | 14 |
the earliest of | 14 |
here in the | 14 |
of a certain | 14 |
as it does | 14 |
in many of | 14 |
are not only | 14 |
to form the | 14 |
of aristotle and | 14 |
of them to | 14 |
the orders of | 14 |
especially in the | 14 |
in the alexandrine | 14 |
will be in | 14 |
sokrates and his | 14 |
made by plato | 14 |
from which it | 14 |
of any other | 14 |
does not appear | 14 |
than those of | 14 |
must be something | 14 |
professes to have | 14 |
of the country | 14 |
his old age | 14 |
less than the | 14 |
hipparchus and minos | 14 |
it consists in | 14 |
according as they | 14 |
in the year | 14 |
for which he | 14 |
according to this | 14 |
in saying that | 14 |
good and beautiful | 14 |
be that which | 14 |
n nu n | 14 |
peri ta s | 14 |
the affirmation of | 14 |
the days of | 14 |
mo non e | 14 |
ethical and political | 14 |
i dissent from | 14 |
which they were | 14 |
the comparison of | 14 |
thing to be | 14 |
not only that | 14 |
only for the | 14 |
purpose in the | 14 |
of plato as | 14 |
in the middle | 14 |
with the body | 14 |
the remarks of | 14 |
such as to | 14 |
he comes to | 14 |
plato himself in | 14 |
from which he | 14 |
good nor evil | 14 |
of the person | 14 |
no means of | 14 |
have seen that | 14 |
of his age | 14 |
little or no | 14 |
is it not | 14 |
with a certain | 14 |
essential to the | 14 |
more and more | 14 |
of justice and | 14 |
of the celestial | 14 |
down by the | 14 |
only to a | 14 |
the best and | 14 |
all the different | 14 |
who is the | 14 |
and when we | 14 |
not as a | 14 |
what he has | 14 |
likely to be | 14 |
it to others | 14 |
through all the | 14 |
under the general | 14 |
was to be | 14 |
which he was | 14 |
in the text | 14 |
there is another | 14 |
it partakes of | 14 |
and if the | 14 |
by the latter | 14 |
that in this | 14 |
to be applied | 14 |
in any way | 14 |
cannot be the | 14 |
shows that the | 14 |
a cause of | 14 |
of sokrates himself | 14 |
and thus to | 14 |
of the territory | 14 |
the words greek | 14 |
at a time | 14 |
by the two | 14 |
i should be | 14 |
the consequences of | 14 |
that they have | 14 |
there are other | 14 |
spirit of the | 14 |
purpose of plato | 14 |
so far forth | 14 |
to distinguish the | 14 |
the same things | 14 |
sum total of | 14 |
it is better | 14 |
will be happy | 13 |
in the memorabilia | 13 |
which he does | 13 |
a body of | 13 |
his own special | 13 |
citizens of the | 13 |
proof of the | 13 |
at some length | 13 |
all varieties of | 13 |
who is to | 13 |
men and animals | 13 |
si unum est | 13 |
to justify the | 13 |
the parts of | 13 |
the memorabilia of | 13 |
would be the | 13 |
which in the | 13 |
maintains that the | 13 |
ga r oi | 13 |
well as a | 13 |
doctrine of parmenides | 13 |
but he was | 13 |
statement of the | 13 |
made up of | 13 |
goes on to | 13 |
it shall be | 13 |
of the life | 13 |
a and greek | 13 |
that we cannot | 13 |
which all things | 13 |
same with itself | 13 |
the mind to | 13 |
for the city | 13 |
or to be | 13 |
gods and heroes | 13 |
a science of | 13 |
was not a | 13 |
to the purpose | 13 |
it from the | 13 |
with the gods | 13 |
to have no | 13 |
years of his | 13 |
all the more | 13 |
to us the | 13 |
the beautiful is | 13 |
must be taken | 13 |
that i know | 13 |
of science and | 13 |
the purposes of | 13 |
that it may | 13 |
in his work | 13 |
composition of the | 13 |
it is more | 13 |
in opposition to | 13 |
the laws and | 13 |
of the last | 13 |
mistake of supposing | 13 |
of the art | 13 |
is no other | 13 |
you know what | 13 |
illustration of the | 13 |
be carried on | 13 |
but we cannot | 13 |
to the effect | 13 |
as it ought | 13 |
the case may | 13 |
upon the same | 13 |
the only man | 13 |
of the rest | 13 |
the case with | 13 |
the lot of | 13 |
plato puts into | 13 |
solution of the | 13 |
time of plato | 13 |
sokrates in his | 13 |
the advice of | 13 |
the relation of | 13 |
of sense and | 13 |
tou s lo | 13 |
according to a | 13 |
at the academy | 13 |
to the point | 13 |
the kings of | 13 |
should have been | 13 |
the side of | 13 |
had not been | 13 |
lots of land | 13 |
of the old | 13 |
thus that the | 13 |
in the eyes | 13 |
that the whole | 13 |
affirms that the | 13 |
the commentary of | 13 |
same manner as | 13 |
main purpose of | 13 |
it in a | 13 |
to be impossible | 13 |
knowledge or intelligence | 13 |
the difficulties which | 13 |
is one thing | 13 |
true and real | 13 |
as the case | 13 |
but he has | 13 |
what is meant | 13 |
is identical with | 13 |
the athenian speaker | 13 |
ta s e | 13 |
copy of the | 13 |
that plato intended | 13 |
chapter of the | 13 |
in case of | 13 |
passages of the | 13 |
what he calls | 13 |
soul of the | 13 |
for the mind | 13 |
s ta s | 13 |
the world is | 13 |
plato tells us | 13 |
no one of | 13 |
if they had | 13 |
compared with that | 13 |
in other platonic | 13 |
the pleasurable and | 13 |
to plato and | 13 |
between philosophy and | 13 |
is more than | 13 |
the aid of | 13 |
men of the | 13 |
he had before | 13 |
has been already | 13 |
by the sophists | 13 |
i shall not | 13 |
because he is | 13 |
the platonic doctrine | 13 |
the ionic philosophers | 13 |
scientific or artistic | 13 |
a means of | 13 |
be taught to | 13 |
against his own | 13 |
set forth the | 13 |
it is both | 13 |
the first principle | 13 |
that they shall | 13 |
well as for | 13 |
the ethical and | 13 |
of the idea | 13 |
long as the | 13 |
alludes to the | 13 |
simile of the | 13 |
on the mind | 13 |
in the soul | 13 |
founded upon the | 13 |
is about to | 13 |
the points of | 13 |
man is happy | 13 |
assigned to the | 13 |
de sophisticis elenchis | 13 |
to the exclusion | 13 |
it is different | 13 |
here laid down | 13 |
now in the | 13 |
of the ancient | 13 |
i have no | 13 |
at all times | 13 |
that it will | 13 |
a definition of | 13 |
that each man | 13 |
a certain measure | 13 |
the republic of | 13 |
the common consciousness | 13 |
is the greatest | 13 |
that every one | 13 |
for its own | 13 |
the choice of | 13 |
cases in which | 13 |
by aristotle in | 13 |
we shall not | 13 |
will have no | 13 |
of all that | 13 |
what is true | 13 |
that you know | 13 |
n to n | 13 |
which a man | 13 |
and without any | 13 |
is competent to | 13 |
in what manner | 13 |
have gone through | 13 |
in that which | 13 |
believe that the | 13 |
is founded on | 13 |
good and bad | 13 |
by sokrates of | 13 |
branch of the | 13 |
the offspring of | 13 |
supposed to have | 13 |
nature of things | 13 |
effect of the | 13 |
declares that he | 13 |
do the same | 13 |
believed in the | 13 |
of the past | 13 |
his own theory | 13 |
and the whole | 13 |
authenticity of the | 13 |
they have been | 13 |
de n a | 13 |
what he himself | 13 |
leben und schriften | 13 |
this to be | 13 |
gain is good | 13 |
a point of | 13 |
it in his | 13 |
are apt to | 13 |
see by the | 13 |
the two first | 13 |
to be false | 13 |
government of the | 13 |
but when he | 13 |
connected with the | 13 |
we have not | 13 |
of a new | 13 |
the form or | 13 |
the extent of | 13 |
than any of | 13 |
nu n de | 13 |
be remembered that | 13 |
be competent to | 13 |
as he was | 13 |
be found to | 13 |
that we may | 13 |
there could be | 13 |
what do you | 13 |
is ascribed to | 13 |
sokrates undertakes to | 13 |
where it is | 13 |
opposed to the | 13 |
believe to be | 13 |
is called the | 13 |
of reasoned truth | 13 |
in the hands | 13 |
in the nature | 13 |
gods and men | 13 |
must be the | 13 |
plato and the | 13 |
in the individual | 13 |
object of the | 13 |
the character and | 13 |
to it in | 13 |
which can be | 13 |
while it is | 13 |
definition given by | 13 |
as he is | 13 |
the service of | 13 |
which we know | 13 |
you will not | 13 |
and i think | 13 |
to me it | 13 |
the true and | 13 |
the same question | 13 |
of the ordinary | 13 |
the kosmos and | 13 |
the two are | 13 |
hot and cold | 13 |
n bi on | 13 |
plato on this | 13 |
indispensable to the | 13 |
by the fact | 13 |
the importance of | 13 |
is full of | 13 |
no man is | 13 |
to suffer wrong | 13 |
of it as | 13 |
the opening of | 13 |
as a fact | 13 |
to n au | 13 |
the doctrine that | 13 |
kai to e | 13 |
of them could | 13 |
to act upon | 13 |
of them in | 13 |
points out that | 13 |
it seems to | 13 |
in his republic | 13 |
to him in | 13 |