This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.
identifier | question |
---|---|
34007 | 263 et seq._) overprinted(?) |
34007 | October(? |
26601 | ? |
26601 | ? |
35566 | Can our authorities not let well enough alone? |
35566 | Can our engravers do nothing better than that? |
35566 | ISSUE WITHOUT GRILLE( 1873?) |
40002 | Naturally the question arises: What is the reason for this state of affairs? |
40002 | The question, however, of superlative interest to philatelists is: why has Nesbitt produced such a large number of dies or die varieties? |
40002 | Why have the Nesbitt die varieties been relegated to an entirely unmerited obscurity? |
43857 | -- St. Louis[ 1897?] |
43857 | Moldau, Moldau- Walachei, Fürstenthum Rumänien, Königreich Rumänien... Magdeburg[ 1893?] |
43857 | [ 1884?] |
43857 | [ 1888?] |
43857 | [ 1900?] |
22190 | 2.--What part of this sum would probably have been received as ordinary revenue if there had been no special issue of stamps? |
22190 | ? |
22190 | Can anyone doubt that all these 150,000 6d stamps were_ not_ perforated? |
22190 | If it is asked"Why cut up and affix the stamps then?" |
22190 | Were they used otherwise than for postage? |
22190 | What were the stamps made for if not to be sold to the public as the public wants them? |
22190 | What would be thought of a furniture store where one could not purchase a table or a chair but must take a whole set? |
39569 | Why did you not tell me anything of this before? |
39569 | & C. Black to every editor in London, if not throughout a wider sphere?" |
39569 | And was not James Chalmers the successor in that line, sixty years ago, of Palmer? |
39569 | Did Mr. Hill tell us_ that_ in his paper of 1839? |
39569 | Did he tell us that he drew up this paper of 1839 under a pressing demand for the adhesive stamp from all quarters? |
39569 | Further, how is it that neither of these members of the Committee before whom I laid my plan had ever heard of any such prior proposal on your part? |
39569 | Here was honesty certainly-- simplicity indeed-- on the side of Mr. Chalmers; but what about the representation on the part of Mr. Hill? |
39569 | Was it the case that he had proposed the adoption of the adhesive stamp in February, 1837, as represented to Mr. Chalmers? |
39569 | What are his last words to Sir Rowland Hill on the subject? |
39569 | [ 10]"Why did not you tell me anything of this before?" |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (?) |
37457 | (_ no value_), black on_ light green._ 1907(?) |
37457 | ) 900,000 3,199,900 400,000? |
37457 | 1(?) |
37457 | 1(?) |
37457 | 1.(?) |
37457 | 12"""? |
37457 | 18"""? |
37457 | 1864(?) |
37457 | 1879(?) |
37457 | 1879(?) |
37457 | 1882, May(?) |
37457 | 1887, May(?) |
37457 | 1888(?) |
37457 | 1888(?) |
37457 | 1888,(?) |
37457 | 1889(?) |
37457 | 1895(?) |
37457 | 1896(?) |
37457 | 1896(?) |
37457 | 1897, Dec. 1(?) |
37457 | 1898, June(?) |
37457 | 1898, June(?) |
37457 | 1898, June(?) |
37457 | 1899, Jan. 8(?) |
37457 | 1901(?) |
37457 | 1904,(?) |
37457 | 1905(?) |
37457 | 1908, June 18(?) |
37457 | 2,000,000(?) |
37457 | 3 pence, 1875(?) |
37457 | 30th June, 1868 1,500,000 2,000,000(?) |
37457 | 30th June, 1868 2,000,000 500,000(?) |
37457 | 6"""? |
37457 | 9"""? |
37457 | = LETTER SHEET.= 1894(?) |
37457 | = THIN RIBBED PAPER= 1/2 penny, deep rose(?) |
37457 | ? |
37457 | ? |
37457 | ? |
37457 | ? |
37457 | ? |
37457 | Are there any more to be distributed, and if so, where will they be distributed? |
37457 | At what offices were they distributed, how many at each office? |
37457 | Aug.(?) |
37457 | How many 2 cent purple envelopes were issued, and how many distributed? |
37457 | If so, when? |
37457 | If the 6 pence stamp of the preceding issue was difficult to select a normal color for, how shall we find one for its successor? |
37457 | Ingram._ Then it was not through stamps being unfit? |
37457 | Is it the intention of the Government to issue an entire new set of stamped envelopes to replace those at present in use? |
37457 | May 15(?) |
37457 | These dimensional differences being so palpably existent, therefore, what factors are we to consider in looking for their cause? |
37457 | This proceeding naturally resulted in considerably more protest on the part of stamp collectors and the public(?). |
37457 | This_ might_ have been done, but if so why were the 7- 1/2 and 10 pence stamps omitted? |
37457 | What can one do in trying to describe the"color"of such a chameleon stamp with such an uncertain basis to work upon? |
37457 | What part of this sum would probably have been received as ordinary revenue if there had been no special issue of stamps? |
37457 | What was the total amount received by the Post Office Department from the sale of the special Tercentenary stamps? |
37457 | When will the present 2 cent purple stamped envelope cease to be issued, and the red issued in its place? |
37457 | Where, then, does this bring us? |
37457 | Will you therefore pardon a short note on the subject? |
37457 | [ 217] Query:"qualities"? |
37457 | _ error_(?) |
37457 | _ imperforate_(?) |
37457 | _ wide impression._ 1857, June 2(?) |
37457 | on 3"""1888(?) |
37457 | purple stamped envelopes done by mistake?" |
37457 | stamp, that the latter was also printed in sheets of 120, as previously suggested, instead of sheets of 100 as stated in Mr. King''s article? |
37457 | stamps were_ not_ perforated? |