Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier	question
A27527	TO come to the Question whether Christ( after the doctrine of Athanasius in his Symbole) be coequal with the father?
A27369	Upon this, says one that was by, How dare you speak such Blasphemous Words?
A39354	Can those Men be SOCINIANS, who acknowledge that Jesus Christ is the True Light In every Man, which he could not be, if he were not Infinite?
A90286	But what need of Divination?
A90286	What one other place hath he produced, whereby the contrary, to what I assert, is evinced?
A90286	what was the opus integrum that was cōmended to the care of{ non- Roman}{ non- Roman}{ non- Roman}{ non- Roman}{ non- Roman}?
A31061	29. and the comprehension whereof he hath reserved unto himself?
A31061	At least in any case it should be mute, or ready to follow Job, saying, Behold, I am vile, what shall I answer thee?
A31061	Being an Answer to this Question, Why do you believe the Doctrin of the Trinity?
A31061	These things which every day we see and taste, we do not know; and are we curious about the Essence of God?
A31061	Wherefore do we stretch our Judgment beyond its Limits, unto Things so infinitely exceeding it?
A67122	But should a man, putting in a crosse interrogatorie, demand of M r Walker Whether he hold that Christ hath fulfilled the Law for us or no?
A67122	How then am I proved to agree with him in that Errour which he is not proved to hold?
A67122	If we have been punished, how are we pardoned?
A67122	x Quid aliud est justificatio quàm peccatorum remissio?
A45406	Who would not think there were somewhat herein really mistaken by me, which called for this so solemn rebuke?
A45406	to Grotius, or those Books of his, which are acknowledged to be his completed, genuine writings?
A38061	10. Who can withstand the power of God?
A38061	27. and the Psalmist puts the question, Whither shall I go from thy spirit?
A38061	But how comes this man to know any thing of God besides what he hath revealed of himself in his word?
A38061	But how could this be?
A38061	God is not a man that he should lie, nor the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it?
A38061	How shall we reconcile this with all we before quoted out of him?
A38061	No question it must afford matter of no small Sport and Entertainment to them, to find a Generation of Men, or Vipers rather shall I call them?
A38061	Succeeded afterwards by Valentinus and Marcus, Marcion, and Hermogenes, and a long train of Hereticks shall I call them?
A38061	When we call God a Spirit, saith he, we mean a substance free from all that thick gross matter which is the object of our senses shall I say?
A38061	[ Am I a God at hand, and not a God afar off?]
A38061	hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?
A38061	or whither shall I flee from thy presence?
A38061	who can baffle his Contrivances, or resist his will?
A67126	32. hee saith, faith obtaines what the Law commands, and what is that but obedience and righteousnesse?
A67126	And what is this, but the way which lyes through workes?
A67126	BVt how the children of faith?
A67126	By faith, our sinnes are made no more our owne, but Christs, upon whom GOD hath laid the iniquities of us all?
A67126	CHrysostome saith, If a Iew aske thee how can all the world be saved by the righteous doings of one Christ?
A67126	First let mee aske him what is his drift in these words?
A67126	For what was he the worse for not being under the Law?
A67126	If( saith he) the uncircumcision keep the righteousnes of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
A67126	Spectatum admissi risum teneatis amici?
A67126	What did Abraham that should be imputed to him for righteousnes, but onely this, that hee believed GOD?
A67126	and againe one man sinned, and all are made guilty, and shall the innocency of one( Christ) bee imputed onely to one?
A67126	and of whose faith, if not of Abrahams?
A67126	the very name of justification signifies so much: and what is the forme of a justified man as he is righteous, but righteousnes?
A67141	Can you hope for any good or pure water, from such foule and polluted Cisternes, full of all heresie and blasphemie?
A67141	Did not I beseech you with teares to be silent in these points, till you had further sifted them, and throughly disputed them with others?
A67141	Did not I patiently put up this, though it wounded my soule?
A67141	If he justifie me, who can condemne?
A67141	Is not this the same tergiversation, which the Hereticke Socinus useth?
A67141	Now where is the infi ● ● ● ● value of his Deity, if he needed justification and favour for himselfe?
A67141	Which is that?
A67141	You will perhaps say, A sharpe and a fierce onset, who can beare it?
A67141	yea, to threaten hell, destruction, and all curses against you, except you repent?
A62866	13. whom do men say, that I the Son of man am?
A62866	5. Who is he that overcometh the world but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?
A62866	6. it notes not man in conspicuous dignity, but rather as contemptible, as the words, what is man that thou art mindful of him?
A62866	8. and so explains it) his judgment( or right) was taken away, and who shall declare his generation?
A62866	And wherefore have I not f ● und favour in thy sight, that thou layest the burden of all this people upon me?
A62866	Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me?
A62866	Besides, if that were the intent, why is not also else- where God brought in using like speech, when he did some great work or miracle?
A62866	But to which of the Angels said he at any time, sit on my right hand, until I make thine Enemies thy Foot- stool?
A62866	For who doubts of that, or doth not indeed know, that to make the frame of the world God used no tools or engines?
A62866	Have I conceived all this people?
A62866	Ought not Christ to suffer these things, and to enter into his glory?
A62866	Saith he, In what form of God could he be Lord afore he was made a man, but in the very Nature and Divine Essence?
A62866	See here is water, what doth hinder me to be Baptized?
A62866	Simon Peter answered him, Lord, to whom shall we go?
A62866	The Jews enquire, Who is this Son of man?
A62866	Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?
A62866	[ Wherefore host thou affl ● cted thy Servant?
A26746	A right Nicodemus temper, which stumbles at Divine Truths only with an — How can these things be?
A26746	And strange it is they should always be in the right, and yet be always condemned for it?
A26746	But after all this, What ground hath this Letter for his Confidence?
A26746	But let old Theodotion, and Symmachus be what they will, what is the Glory of having these two on their side, when the whole Church was against them?
A26746	But you will say then, where, or how doth this Creed teach the Divinity of the Holy Ghost?
A26746	But you will say, what is the reason then, we are not commanded to pray expresly and particularly to the Holy Ghost, as we are to God?
A26746	For did these Authors recite this Creed, yet how doth this prove the Apostolical Composure of it?
A26746	For who knows not the Writings of Irenaeus, Melito,& c in which Christ is set forth as both God and Man?
A26746	Jesus said — thou shalt not Tempt the Lord thy God?
A26746	Now here is a Priority of Order or Prace; but where is that of Time and Power?
A26746	That he ascended, what is it, but that he descended first?
A26746	This is evident from Joshua; for c. 5. v. 13. he sees a Man with a drawn Sword, and ▪ asks, Who he was for?
A26746	Where have ye laid him?
A26746	Where is Abel thy Brother, doth prove that God knew not what was become of him?
A26746	Why callest thou me Good?
A26746	Why not God''s Son, since the Scriptures so often call him so?
A26746	Why one of these Angels may not be the Son of God, as well as these three Men be Angels?
A26746	Will ye accept his Person?
A26746	Will ye speak wickedly for God?
A26746	Will ye speak wickedly for God?
A26746	and talk deceitfully for him?
A26746	as Man, or as God?
A26746	l. 1. if the Holy Ghost be not God, Tì 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 ▪ Why do Men believe the H. Ghost?
A26746	— Will ye accept his Person?
A26746	〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 — who hath heard such things as these?
A38046	And then as to the thing it self, why should any man think it Strange and Unaccountable that there are Dissentions in Christendom?
A38046	And whom do they( for this man speaks the sense of the rest) mean by Priests but the Ministers of Religion?
A38046	But what is the ground of the foresaid Assertion?
A38046	Can there be any Reason given of this partial dealing?
A38046	For what though there be mere Pretenders to Godliness?
A38046	How unreasonably then do men question a God, and cry out against Religion it self because they see so many of this sort of Disorders in the world?
A38046	Is there no probability of a brave fortuitous hit once again?
A38046	Is there no such fine piece of work as that of Sun, Moon, and Stars, to be expected once more?
A38046	Is this Fortunate Lottery at an end?
A38046	Must I therefore thence conclude that all Professors of Religion are an errant Cheat?
A38046	Or, suppose he tells the Rabble that Messiah signifies Anointed, what then?
A38046	Then you shall hear one cry out, Quis putet esse Deos?
A38046	Then, as to their Motion, whence had they that?
A38046	Thus where is there more of Atheism than in Italy, the Pope''s own Soil, part of which is call''d Holy Land?
A38046	What makes him contend for One Single Article, with the Exclusion of all the rest?
A38046	What though there are great numbers of Religious Impostors?
A38046	Why then must there be but One Article, and no more?
A38046	Why therefore are they so void of Ingenuity and fair- dealing, as not to admit of the same in the case that is before us?
A38046	Why?
A38046	doth it thence follow that there is none at all?
A38046	either of themselves or of an other?
A38046	is this Lucky Chance quite ceas''d?
A38046	yea indeed, what ground have these Chance- Philosophers to think that there ever was any such thing?
A60471	12. and done justly, and loved Mercy, and walked humbly with God?
A60471	15. Who is he that overcometh the World, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?
A60471	26. and lived soberly, and righteously, and godlily in this present World?
A60471	And that the Son of Man has given his Life a Ransom for many?
A60471	And unto which of the Angels said God at any time, Sit thou on my right hand?
A60471	At that great Solemnity the Inquiry will not be, What had you in the World?
A60471	Can he give Power to Believers to become the Sons of God?
A60471	Has he Power to judg the World?
A60471	Has he Power to raise from the dead?
A60471	Have you clothed the Naked?
A60471	Have you fed the Hungry?
A60471	Have you renounced the Lust of the Flesh, the Lust of the Eye, and the Pride of Life?
A60471	Have you visited the Sick?
A60471	How could he be before David, when''t was out of David''s Posterity that God raised up Jesus according to his Promise?
A60471	How could he have a Being before Abraham, since''t is declared he was of the Seed of Abraham?
A60471	How then could we be saved by Free Grace?
A60471	Is he able to save the World?
A60471	Will it make me love and honour God better?
A60471	Will it make the Service which I render to his Divine Majesty a more reasonable Service?
A60471	and by whom shall we render Thanks to God?
A60471	and how could our Sins be said to be forgiven?
A60471	but what good Deeds have you done therein?
A60471	how has your Care been to promote the Universal Good of rational Beings?
A60471	or what did you profess?
A60471	who shall be our Intercessor, our Advocate, our Mediator?
A64356	69. been very liberal to the Adversaries of the Doctrine of the Trinity, and in a manner given them for Patrons and Advocates?
A64356	And again, in saying even to the People, Yea, and why of your selves judge ye not what is right?
A64356	And are not your Fellow- I ● … suites also, even the prime Men of your Order, Prevarieators in this point as well as others?
A64356	And doth he not in the same place peach Tertullian also, and in a manner give him away to the Arians?
A64356	And may not one Party be confuted without the Spirit of Infallibility?
A64356	And of this how are we sure?
A64356	And pronounce generally of the Fathers before the Council of Nice, that the Arians would gladly be tried by them?
A64356	And then for the Consent of the Ancients, that that also delivers it not, by whom are we taught but by Papists only?
A64356	And when they plead Tradition, why is not theirs then as much the Popish Plea, as, when they plead Scripture, it is the Protestants?
A64356	And who will assure us, that it was not pick''d out of the Guide for this disingenuous end?
A64356	But what if a Socinian be found perverse, and, being a Disputer of this World, will have his own way of arguing?
A64356	Do they say Theology knows nothing of this?
A64356	For, what is Discourse, but drawing Conclusions out of Premises by good Consequence?
A64356	If Men in Books, in Pulpits, in Conversation, shall daily ask the question, Where is the Protestant''s Judge?
A64356	If the Protestant and Socinian were equally dispos''d, how comes the One to Interpret as a Catholick, the Other as a Heretick?
A64356	If this be Interpreting, what is Perverting?
A64356	Is it not the same Perron, in his reply to K. Iames, in the Fifth Chapter of his Fourth Observation?
A64356	Is it not the same great Cardinal in his Book of the Eucharist against M. du Plessis l. 2. c. 7?
A64356	May not the Protestant wave the Council of Nice, and enter the Lists, with Reason and Scripture?
A64356	Or can any Man believe a Quotation is made good by the meer quoting of it?
A64356	Otherwise, why d ● … es the Paper just now scattered abroad, b style the Socinians the Brethren of Protestants by descent and iniquity?
A64356	Prejudice, Mis- attention, Corruption may so prevail as to clap a false Byass upon Makers of Creeds: Else how came we by those of Sirmium and Rimini?
A64356	That it was gathered meerly as the choicest Flower contain''d in that Book; and not as the fittest in this juncture for this calumniating purpose?
A64356	To what other purpose serveth the beginning of the long Book just now appearing, and call''d, a Letter to the Bishop of Lincoln c?
A64356	What then?
A64356	Who is it that makes known to all the World, that Eusebius that great searcher and devourer of the Christian Libraries was an Arian?
A64356	Who is it that pretends that Irenaeus hath said those things, which he that should now hold would be esteemed an Arian?
A64356	of his Reply to King Iames?
A59900	And what now does this Socinian say to this?
A59900	But do I require any man to believe Contradictions?
A59900	But does he consider, what the Consequence of this Argument is?
A59900	But how will this Socinian, who rejects the Evidence of Sense, confute Transubstantiation?
A59900	But must we not hearken to Reason when it finds Contradictions in what men affirm concerning God?
A59900	But what is all this to my Sermon?
A59900	Can he prove, that they ever deceive us with Qualities and Accidents without a Substance?
A59900	Do I any where say, That we must always expound the Scripture to a literal Sense?
A59900	For is there no way of knowing what is Bread, and what is Flesh, but by Revelation?
A59900	How Soul and Body are United, which can not Touch each other?
A59900	How Thought moves our Bodies, and excites our Passions?
A59900	How a Spirit should feel Pain or Pleasures from the Impressions on the Body?
A59900	How we Think and Reason?
A59900	How?
A59900	Is not this the proper object of Sense and Reason?
A59900	Is there no difference between what Reason ca n''t conceive, comprehend, approve, and what the Reason of all Mankind contradicts?
A59900	Nay, How we See and Hear?
A59900	Nay, do I say, that there are any such Contradictions?
A59900	Not believe Scripture?
A59900	That when Christ is called a Way, a Door, a Rock, we must understand this literally?
A59900	They are not the supreme and absolute judges in matters of pure Revelation; But does it hence follow, that they can not judge of their proper Objects?
A59900	What is the meaning of their Expounding Scripture by Reason, not like Fools, but like Wise men?
A59900	What naked Matter stripp''d of all Accidents and Qualities is?
A59900	Whether the Pretences of contradicting Reason and Philosophy, and the vain Pretences to Philosophy, signify Reason and Philosophy?
A59900	and of what good use such a Faith can be to us?
A59900	hath not God made foolish the wisdom of this world?
A59900	what merit there can be in believing such Doctrines?
A59900	where is the disputer of this world?
A59900	where is the scribe?
A32802	But how came divers families to be subjected to one King or common Father?
A32802	But let the Socinians speak their minde clearely, then what is it they would have?
A32802	Can the Papists desire fairer quarter, or a foller acknowledgement?
A32802	Did Melanchthon, Bucer, Calvin, Beza, Bullinger, ever preach such doctrine?
A32802	Doe any Reformed Divines maintain this seditious tenent which will certainly ruine any State where it is generally received?
A32802	Ex consensu tantùm in principalibus cum Ario de Jesu Christo, Arianismi jure quis argui potest?
A32802	He had one question more, which he tooke much pride in, namely, Utrum Essentia concurrat in Trinitatem?
A32802	Hoe aut ● m ann ● ● est Ecclesi ● ejusque Doctoribus contr ● versias cum aliorū obligatione judicādi Potestatem adscribere?
A32802	How shall it appeare, say they, that any Church preaches the saving Truth?
A32802	How will the Socinians triumph when they heare the Primate of all England discoursing of the Godhead of Christ and the Holy Ghost as Niceties?
A32802	I appeale to the conscience of* Dr. Sheldon whether he hath not reserved more charity for an Infidel then a Calvinist?
A32802	I remember his observations upon that Text, Good Master what shall I doe that I may inherit eternall life?
A32802	Is there nothing written in Scripture concerning the eternall Deity of Christ?
A32802	Mr. Chillingworth proves undeniably that the Church of Rome is not Infallible, but to what end and purpose?
A32802	Must we then subscribe to that Arminian and Socinian principle, Nullum dogma controversum est fundamentale?
A32802	Nay was not the faction of Anabaptists raised by the Devil and fomented by Rome, on purpose to hinder the Reformation begun by those worthy Reformers?
A32802	Quid interea bonus ille Hosius Cardinalis cum suis Catholieis?
A32802	Sure the good Dr. forgot the Jaylours question, What shall I doe to be saved?
A32802	They protest against Brownisme, as a* bitter error, and full of cruelty; what can be desired more, to cleare them from being Brownists or Anabaptists?
A32802	Vulpt ● bus atque leves voltis confidere Mergi?
A32802	Was it not lawfull for Judah to reforme her selfe whē Israel would not joyn?
A32802	What did the man that was cured of the palsy beleeve?
A32802	What doe the Socinians, or indeed Arminians require more?
A32802	What saith Mr. Chillingworth to this bold charge?
A32802	What, Sir, must there be no deduction, no consequences allowed?
A32802	When a point begins to be controverted shall it cease to be Fundamentall?
A32802	Whiles we are unregenerate God knowes we can not repent and beleeve; is not God offended with us even then, for our impenitence and unbeleefe?
A32802	Who are so active in all Counsells of warre at Oxford, as men that are shrewdly suspected for Socinianisme?
A32802	Who sees not what conclusion will follow?
A32802	and the Apostles answer, Beleeve,& c. Is this the Calvinisme he jerkes at?
A32802	frustra accedis qui hoc& illud non credas?
A32802	it is not, saith he, what shall I beleeve, as the Calvinists would have it,( or to that effect) but what shall I doe?
A32802	must there be expresse letter of Scripture?
A32802	nay did they not constantly oppose the Anabaptists in this very point?
A32802	nisi servi Christi?
A32802	quid alii?
A41509	Are not all these Judgments of God upon Men for their Sins?
A41509	But what is it that David would have Kings and Judges of the Earth to learn and be instructed in?
A41509	But what upon the matter remains in the same place is this, Whether a God, and a God, and a God, do not amount to more than One God?
A41509	But what would ye have done if there had been no Epistle nor Preface to carp at?
A41509	Can any thing in relation to the Church, be spoken more insolently in the face of the whole Nation?
A41509	Doth not our Grammar tell us, that Nouns Adjectives are compared, and that there are three degrees of Comparison, have ye so far forgotten it?
A41509	He answered, Wist ye not that I must be about my Father''s business?
A41509	However''t is worth the inquiring into, what they ground upon their calling themselves Members of the Church?
A41509	I ask ▪ Is not Gold, Gold still, and good, tho''it be not Enamel''d, or otherwise curiously wrought?
A41509	Now what shall we do, of these two Opinions to find out the true one?
A41509	Of the Godhead, What more Divine and Expressive?
A41509	So the Question came to this, Whether the Lord Jesus was God?
A41509	Then''t is likely you would have taken no notice of my Book, or else why do ye leave the Principal for the Accessary?
A41509	Thus if your witty Premises do fall, how can your learned Inferences stand?
A41509	Thus when the Jews spake against the things that were spoken by Paul, and what were those things?
A41509	a Quality with God and a Thing God?
A41509	but what followeth for not glorifying God as he should be?
A41509	doth this Interpretation hold any proportion with that high and noble Idea which the Evangelist would give us of the Person whose History he writes?
A41509	first of all we defy them to shew that this is the Sense of any Text concerning this Matter?
A41509	hath not God made foolish the Wisdom of these Men, if ever they had any?
A41509	hereupon to them we may put the Question, which upon the account of the most holy Trinity they put to us; a thing is or is not?
A41509	how sawcy with God are some Men in the World, in setting out their foolish and wandering Fancies, and where is a due Respect for his Holy Word?
A41509	if not, why do you concern your selves for them?
A41509	if ye be, why are ye such Hypocrites as to deny it?
A41509	let them maintain their own Quarrel and defend their own Cause, and why do ye take up the Cudgels for them?
A41509	shall not I be avenged on such a Nation as this?
A41509	what will become of all the glorious Attributes and Prerogative of the Lord Jesus over Angels and Men?
A41509	ye are Socinians or ye are not?
A42456	20. b Quo teneam vultus mutantem Protea nodo?
A42456	35. z Quid interest Deos neges, an infames?
A42456	5 What can be spoken more plainly?
A42456	Again, is the attestation it selfe true, or no?
A42456	Again, where, think we, meaneth he, that all this was pretended?
A42456	Against those words, f Did I not then shew both patience, love, and all good affection?
A42456	And indeed what was it to any of us, whether M. Walker had had M. Wottons answers, or no?
A42456	And might they not justly so report, when in effect the Ministers under their hands had all joyntly so done?
A42456	And to what end then should such a charge be given to the Doctor, that M. VValker should by no means be admitted to the sight of it?
A42456	And to what purpose were it, for me to deny, and you to affirme; and so as it were out- vy one anothers credit?
A42456	And why so?
A42456	But am I, or is any man else bound to reconcile whatsoever contradictions are, if any be, or may be found in M. VVottons writings?
A42456	But how, or where, doth M. VVotton thus deride our Orthodox Divines?
A42456	But what saith Lubbertus to him for it?
A42456	Did ever man read a charge more malicious, or more slenderly backt?
A42456	For doth not the Word of God say expresly, that i Christ was, and is justified?
A42456	For first, I might demand of him, where I so extolled M. Bradshaws book?
A42456	For first, is M. Walker a Minister of Gods Word?
A42456	For first, who be the They, that he speaketh of?
A42456	For how can that be erroneous, that is held on good ground?
A42456	For not to stand upon strict terms concerning the word Worthie: what doth M. Wotton say more here, then that which he saith else- where?
A42456	For what needed M. Walker to have kept all this coil, and have made all this ado if no such thing had then been, or were about to ● e done?
A42456	For x what Iudge is bound to sentence any man upon evidence not produced?
A42456	How many mens writings may more then seven times seven errors be found in, whom it were yet most uncharitable therefore to censure for such?
A42456	Is the name of Antonie Wotton then so obscure a title?
A42456	Or is every one that is taken in grosse contradictions, of necessity thereupon to be condemned for an heretick?
A42456	Or wil M. Walker therefore dare to pronounce Luther an heretick, as denying the truth of Christs humanity?
A42456	Purgemme?
A42456	Sixtly, suppose it were an error, and a dangerous one to, that M. Wotton maintains; whence knows M. Walker?
A42456	Thirdly, what if M. Wotton and M. Bradshaw do not herein at all differ, or crosse either other?
A42456	We use to ask, who are blinder then they that wil not see?
A42456	What more pregnant?
A42456	Whether of the two do you credit?
A42456	Which if he speak of the word merit, who wil, or can deny the truth of it?
A42456	Who is he, that is careful to make diligent enquiry into the truth of things, who doth not oft alter his former opinion?
A42456	Wotton published, truly related, or no?
A42456	Yea but, how doth M. Walker, from what he either finds in M. Wotton, or fathers on him, extract a denial of Christs Deity?
A42456	Yea take away all benefit of Exposition, and who almost may not be condemned of heresie and blasphemy?
A42456	and was not M. Wotton the same?
A42456	and why not also, x because I do alwaies those things, that are pleasing to him?
A42456	and withall desired me to give mine opinion, whether that were not an error?
A42456	and yet what is it, that M. Walker thence here alledgeth?
A42456	at least why doth he not arraign and condemn him for an heretick as wel as M. Wotton?
A42456	b Where at length shall we have him?
A42456	but may very well be reconciled?
A42456	d Ecquis innocens esse pote ● j ● ● si acousasse sufficiet?
A42456	doth not the same word say, that k he was in favour, yea that l he grew in favour, both with God and man?
A42456	for how did not he take upon him to determine what was heresie, when he charged M. Wotton with it?
A42456	h Now where, saith he, is the infinite valew of Christs Deity, if he have need of justification and favour for himself?
A42456	how cometh he then to say, They?
A42456	or was it related only there; but pretended before at the meeting among our selves?
A42456	or was not either of these for himself?
A42456	u Is this matter of eating our Saviour such a pill to your understanding, that rather then disgest it, you will turne Turke or Infidel?
A42456	was it pretended at the Table?
A42456	was it the Doctor alone, that told all this faire tale, and pretended all this?
A42456	would it thence follow that M. VVotton denies the Deity of Christ?
A42456	yea or, that in those very words they speake the same thing?
A42456	● iri creditis?
A44658	A Friend of mine, of Quality and Learning, told me, he ask''d a Minister why he was displeas''d at the History of Religion?
A44658	And for whom is it, that you counterfeit this pious Tenderness?
A44658	But has Socinus wrote against Christianity?
A44658	But how do Mr. Blount and Sir R. H. differ in the Accounts which they give of the Original of Idolatry?
A44658	But now it will be ask''d, why it''s call''d Reveal''d Religion?
A44658	But pray how has Sir R. set his Face directly against the Doctrines of Religion?
A44658	But what do I talk of good luck?
A44658	But what is there, so remote, or hid from others, that a Student can not discover it?
A44658	But what says Sir R. H.?
A44658	But what shall we do in this case?
A44658	But why Sons of Belial?
A44658	But why not as well the Rites of the latter from the former?
A44658	But why that Consequence?
A44658	But why this to the Author of the History of Religion?
A44658	But why would the Libeller have us believe to the bottom of an Article, when to the bottom we can not dive?
A44658	By what Religion, Sir?
A44658	Can we describe it?
A44658	Do we understand it perfectly?
A44658	Do you think your good Nature will bear you out?
A44658	For what Nation is there so great, who hath God so nigh unto them as the Lord our God is in all things, that we call upon him for?
A44658	Has he confounded Arbitrary Power that had well nigh confounded the Nation?
A44658	How Sir R. H. has provok''d,& c. Has Sir R. H. question''d the Existence of a Deity?
A44658	How so; have you dropt the least word against the Doctrines of the Trinity, the Incarnation, or the Satisfaction?
A44658	Is a Deist quite as bad as an Atheist?
A44658	Is not Heaven a Mystery to us?
A44658	Is this the Sobriety of a Bishop Elect; or a Reflection to be prefaced with, a Blessed God?
A44658	Now what Disciple of Spinoza or Hobbs could have put such pointed words into the Mouth of a wise Heathen?
A44658	Now what if Mr. Blount does build on the same Foundation as Dr. Tillotson?
A44658	Now who knows but that Sir R. H''s Socinianism may in time come to be good Orthodox Doctrine?
A44658	Now, Sir, what do you think of your self, that would have me deal gently with Men that blaspheme both God, and the King?
A44658	One word more with this Nominal Vindicator, Why is the History of Religion such an Execrable Pamphlet?
A44658	Very true: But what will he hence prove?
A44658	What Nation has so glorious Testimonies of Divine Favour and Presence as you have?
A44658	What an insufferable Presumption is it in him, to be positive?
A44658	What are the Doctrines of Christianity, against which Sir R. H. has fought with borrow''d Socinian Arms?
A44658	What is to be got by believing more than we can understand?
A44658	What mean these words, Sir R. H. levels directly at the Trinity, Incarnation, Divinity and Satisfaction of Christ?
A44658	What new great Mystery''s this, that''s come to Town, So long kept silent, and so lately known?
A44658	What says Momus to this?
A44658	What then?
A44658	and is it not reasonable, is it not necessary, that the Methods of fitting us for it, and of conveying us thither, should be very mysterious to us?
A44658	and what Nation is there so great, that hath Statutes and Jugdments so righteous as all this Law which I set before you this day?
A44658	be content that his Character should be open''d, and the History of his Life drawn forth?
A44658	good moral Practice?
A44658	has he slurr''d the Divine Right of Episcopacy, and given the Prelates but a Parliamentary Right in the room?
A44658	how will the Gentlemen answer it to God, and their Country, who have laid open the Inclosures of the Corporation?
A44658	if the World be made acquainted, how the Heathen Priests topp''d false Doctrines upon the People, and by cunning wicked Arts made a Gain of them?
A44658	or deny''d the Truth of Revealed Religion?
A44658	prov''d himself a Blockhead, which he need not have done neither?
A44658	that accursed and devoted Head?
A44658	was God''s Nature chang''d, was he grown weary of the Purity and Simplicity of the Worship which the best Men of the first Ages paid him?
A44658	what''s the fault of that History?
A44658	who translated himself but t''other day, from working on another Man''s profane Satyr, to the study of Divinity?
A44658	would have done it?
A59791	1st, I desire to know, whether he thinks the Doctrine of the Trinity to be defensible or not?
A59791	3dly, How are Atheists concerned in the Disputes of the Trinity?
A59791	And is it not better that such Pamphlets should be in an hundred hands with an Answer, than in five hands without one?
A59791	And now can any Man tell, what Opinion this Melancholy Stander- by has of the Doctrines of the Trinity, and Incarnation?
A59791	And what is the hurt of this?
A59791	And when the Faith is publickly opposed and scorned in Printed Libels, ought it not to be as publickly defended?
A59791	And whether Christ and his Apostles intended to teach any more?
A59791	But I would desire this Author to tell me, whether we must believe Fundamentals with, or without Reason?
A59791	But did his Socinian Friends, who were such busie Factors for the Cause, tell him so?
A59791	But if these Dissentions be so great a blemish to the Reformation, whose Fault is it?
A59791	But is there no danger that the Church may be flung out of possession, and lose the Faith, if she do n''t defend it?
A59791	But it will be said, What shall we do?
A59791	But let them be never so good Men, as some of the Heathen Philosophers were, must we therefore tamely suffer them to pervert the Faith?
A59791	But pray, why should we not write against the Socinians?
A59791	But what is that?
A59791	But when this fit time is come( for I know not what he means by a fit place) what shall we do then?
A59791	But why is it so unseasonable in this Juncture?
A59791	Can we certainly learn from Scripture, Whether Christ be a God Incarnate, or a mere Man?
A59791	Did they print them, that no body might read them?
A59791	Do we then deny, that there are Three Persons and One God?
A59791	Does he think that they are no Christians, and ought not to be concerned for common Christianity?
A59791	For must we believe the Words or the Sense of Scripture?
A59791	However, were it so; is there no regard to be had to Hereticks themselves?
A59791	I would ask any man who talks at this rate about a Latitude of Faith, Whether there be any more than One True Christian Faith?
A59791	If ever it will be so, why is it not so now?
A59791	If it be not defensible, why does he believe it?
A59791	If this never will be Christian and Wholesome, what else is to be done to Hereticks in fit time and place, unless he intends to Physick''em?
A59791	If we can not, Why should we believe either?
A59791	Is not every Divine Person who is God, a Mind, and an Eternal Mind?
A59791	Is not the Eternal Spirit, which searcheth the deep things of God, as the Spirit of a Man knoweth the things of a Man, a Mind?
A59791	Is not the substantial Word and Wisdom of God a Mind?
A59791	Is not this their proper Work and Business?
A59791	Is this an Age to resolve our Faith into Church Authority?
A59791	Must we be afraid of defending the Faith of the Trinity, lest Atheists should mock at it, who already mock at the Being of a God?
A59791	Must we renounce Christianity, to keep out Popery?
A59791	Must we then turn all Socinians, to preserve the Reformation?
A59791	No, The Adversaries to the received Doctrine( Why not to the true Faith?)
A59791	No, our business is to prove it, and explain and vindicate it?
A59791	Or does he think, that the Defences made by Trinitarians expose the Faith more than the Objections of Socinians?
A59791	Or has Christ and his Apostles left it at liberty to believe what we like, and to let the rest alone?
A59791	Or how are we concerned to avoid scandalizing Atheists, who believe that there is no God at all?
A59791	Or whether they did not intend, That all Christians should be obliged to believe this One Faith?
A59791	Or would he himself believe such absurd Doctrines as they represent the Trinity in Unity to be, merely upon Church Authority?
A59791	Ought not they to satisfie themselves, that there is no force in the Objections, which are made against the Faith?
A59791	Pray what hurt have they done?
A59791	Renounce the Faith of the Trinity, for the sake of Peace?
A59791	Theirs who dissent from the Truth, or theirs who defend it?
A59791	To believe that the Eternal Word was made Flesh; or that Christ was no more than a Man, who had no being before he was born of the Virgin Mary?
A59791	Was there ever such a Reason thought of as this?
A59791	Well: What shall we do then?
A59791	Were they not dispersed in every Corner, and boasted of in every Coffee- house, before any Answer appeared?
A59791	What Faith is that which can subsist without a Foundation?
A59791	What Faith must we contend for, if not for Fundamentals?
A59791	What else can we dispute for, when Foundations are overturned?
A59791	What else is worth disputing?
A59791	What is the meaning of that Apostolical Precept, To contend earnestly for the Faith?
A59791	What purer Reformers were these?
A59791	What shall Christians do then, when Atheists, Infidels, and Hereticks, strike at the very Foundations of their Faith?
A59791	What shall we have left of Christianity, if we must either cast away, or not defend every thing, which Atheists will mock at?
A59791	What?
A59791	When Hereticks dispute against the Faith, must we be afraid of disputing for it, for fear of making a Controversie of Fundamentals?
A59791	Whether we must take Fundamentals for granted, and receive them with an implicite Faith, or know for what Reason we believe them?
A59791	Why does he let St. Austin escape, from whom the Master of the Sentences borrowed most of his Distinctions and Subtilties?
A59791	Why does he not accuse the Ancient Fathers and Councils, from whom the Schoolmen learnt these Terms?
A59791	Will he then give us leave to write and dispute against such Hereticks?
A59791	Will it ever be most Christian and most Wholesome, to dispute for the Faith against Heresie?
A59791	Will the World think that we are all of a mind, because there is disputing only on one side?
A59791	With respect to the Doctrine of the Trinity and Incarnation?
A59791	how long must we be silent?
A42050	And if so, How can two such Persons be in an equal Capacity of Salvation, except a wrong way do as directly lead to Heaven as the right one?
A42050	And if so, How could the trial of Religions depend upon the Press in those early days, when as yet it had no being?
A42050	And is it not high time to watch the Press, lest any thing steal from thence, which may Poyson the Heads of unwary Men?
A42050	And is the, how, all?
A42050	And was not the neglect of this Duty a sin in former Ages, when there was not so much as one Press in all the World?
A42050	And whom he means by these Hereticks, he elsewhere tells us, Calvinistos& Lutheranos Haereticos esse quis non videt?
A42050	Are not their Writings and ours to be seen, and had in many Shops in London, Oxford, Cambridge, and other great Towns and Cities?
A42050	Are ten thousand of us at once presumed to be Hypocrites, Juglers, and gross Dissemblers with God and Man?
A42050	But here it may be demanded, Who must judge, whether such or such an Opinion be justified or condemned by such or such a Text?
A42050	But is the miscarriage of some few Licensers an Argument that they should all be laid aside?
A42050	But to whom ought the Care of this be committed?
A42050	But what do they speak?
A42050	But whence might this gross Ignorance of theirs arise?
A42050	But where lieth the Fault?
A42050	But why did St. Paul inflict it?
A42050	Did any of them ever provoke the professours of Divinity in either of our Universities, to a publick Disputation, and was refused?
A42050	Did they give them an universal Liberty of Conscience?
A42050	Did they indulge them?
A42050	For if our Directions should chance to prove wrong, What Excuse could we make?
A42050	Have they not received our printed Answers to their printed Objections?
A42050	Have we no Catechisms, no Systems of Divinity left amongst us?
A42050	His Inference is this, If the first be their Duty, the Press ought not to be restrained; But why not?
A42050	If they have, Why should this Author complain for want of fair Play?
A42050	Is a Bridle and a Halter the same thing?
A42050	Is it indeed his pleasure, that ill Men, and ill Opinions, should be indulged and countenanced in his Church?
A42050	Is the what excluded?
A42050	It will not fright Men from considering,& c. but what Men?
A42050	Must we permit the Church our Mother, or her Sons who are our Brethren to receive Wounds in their Heads, because we have Balsam enough to Cure them?
A42050	Must we permit the Souls of Men to be poysoned, because we abound with Sovereign Antidotes?
A42050	Nay more, are there not Popish and Socinian Catechisms to be had in England?
A42050	Nay, are there not Books of Controversies exposed to Sale in our Cities, greater Towns, and both our Universities?
A42050	Nay, the Psalmist tells his God, They speak against thee; and what wonder then if they speak against his Religion too?
A42050	Now, the Question is, Who must judge betwixt us and them?
A42050	Of the same mind was St. Paul, who saith, Their Mouths must be stopped; but how can that be done, if there may be no Penal Laws?
A42050	Protestants they are, but why are they such?
A42050	Quae est pejor mors animae, quàm libertas erroris?
A42050	Some Judges have been corrupted, and must we therefore have neither King nor Judg?
A42050	Suppose a Man profess the Religion of Mahomet with the greatest Devotion that can be, would not the what condemn him, or would the how excuse him?
A42050	Tell me then, are our Bibles out of Print, or taken from us?
A42050	The Heretick must not be destroyed, but may he not be restrain''d?
A42050	There are indeed in the word of God, as the Apostle saith, Some things hard to be understood; but in what Texts do these difficulties lie?
A42050	These indeed are very considerable Objections against the Restraint of the Press, were they true; But how doth our Author prove them so to be?
A42050	They who have a good Cause, but who are they?
A42050	To this our Lord sent his hearers, Search the Scriptures; and again, How readest thou?
A42050	Upon whom, or what, must this sin be charged?
A42050	We are abundantly convinced that our Religion can not be false; and why then should any Man presume that we have indeed other thoughts concerning it?
A42050	We grant it, but what then?
A42050	We have so, and bless God for it; But what then?
A42050	We, who teach Men that a false Religion leads towards Hell, do we know our own to be false, and yet embrace it still?
A42050	Well, the main Parties, now contending, are the Church of England, and our Socinians, and have not these Men very often been heard already?
A42050	What one single Soul would be the worse?
A42050	Who must determine, whether the Scripture be on their side, or ours?
A42050	Why else doth the Apostle mention the Glorious Light of the Gospel?
A42050	Why should he unworthily tell the World, that we dare not suffer our Religion to undergo a fair Trial, for fear it should prove False?
A42050	did Hezekiah, did Josiah, nay did Jehu, grant a Publick Indulgence for the Worship of Idols, because many both Laicks and Priests were for it?
A42050	the whole Clergy?
A42050	〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉, shall I bring a Rod to whip and scourge you?
A52291	3. is Eternal Life promised to Belief in the Son?
A52291	53. Who shall declare his generation?
A52291	And besides, what signifies the largeness and gloriousness of the Heavenly Bodies, in comparison with Mens Immortal Souls?
A52291	And had the Socinian Brethren nothing to do, when they wrote their Summaries of Religion, which are Catalogues of their Fundamentals?
A52291	And so now what is become of our Authour''s natural Faith which he makes to be the Mother of the Evangelical?
A52291	And what other use do we desire to make of them than this?
A52291	And what then?
A52291	And why should not poor Athanasius Bishop of Alexandria, a mighty City too, draw as many of his Neighbours of his side?
A52291	Are all his Chapters about the Socinian Notions of Faith nothing but slips in the penning?
A52291	Are so many Arguments against our Saviour''s eternal Generation nothing else?
A52291	Besides, if the Holy Ghost be only an action, with what propriety of speech can he be said to act or do?
A52291	But I say, What constat is there that he designed only this?
A52291	But after all, What constat is there that he designed this to be handed only to those Members?
A52291	But for all our Authours hast, why ca n''t we imagine a third way, that he should be two Natures, and but one Person?
A52291	But how can he draw from these words, that he had an implicit Faith in the other?
A52291	But how does he prove that it may not be so for all the Doctrine of the Trinity?
A52291	But how does he prove that?
A52291	But however, why should we not dispute concerning a Mystery?
A52291	But then, what is this to our Authour''s purpose?
A52291	But to pass over this, what though this Controversy was setled by Theodosius?
A52291	But what are these to Three distinct Persons in one Essence?
A52291	But what disgrace is it to this Council to be Condemned by an Heretick and an Usurper, as Basiliscus was both?
A52291	But what is this idle Excuse of an Arian Conventicle to the great Orthodox Council of Nice?
A52291	But what though there did arise some Troubles in the Church, upon this dispute of our Saviour''s Divinity?
A52291	But what though they did cap Scripture?
A52291	But who ever said, that our Lord''s name, being in any Proposition, gave truth or dignity to it purely as such?
A52291	But why must every explication of the Possibility of the existence of a thing make it comprehensible?
A52291	But why must this be an implicit Faith in two Bishops?
A52291	But why should difficulty make a defect of Faith?
A52291	But why should not the Bishop of Constantinople, by the same rule, have as many always at his command?
A52291	But why should they be lead by the Greatness of his City?
A52291	But why so?
A52291	But why so?
A52291	But, by the Authour''s Favour, who ever, of the Orthodox, said, our Lord''s Person was comprehensible, or ever pretended to comprehend it?
A52291	But, why this to the Convocation?
A52291	Do the Rubricks, Canons, Articles, or any other Publick Authority of the Church say any thing like it?
A52291	Doth not this( says the Authour) plainly deny a Resurrection of the same numerical Particles?
A52291	For what can we suppose those Men to say or do, which out of base compliance to a wicked Emperour, had denied their Faith?
A52291	For, I pray, what difference is there between Sabellius''s Explication of the Trinity and the Doctor''s?
A52291	Has he any 〈 ◊ 〉, that the Compilers of the Common- Prayer designed any such thing?
A52291	How all the Gospel is Faith and Repentance?
A52291	Now can any mortal Man conclude from hence, that the word God is used to signify something indefinite?
A52291	Now in the Union of the Divinity with the humanity, wherein possibly can their Oneness consist, but only in their personality?
A52291	Now is not this a pretty excuse after so long hammering out?
A52291	Now what can be meant by knowing Jesus Christ, but knowing or believing his Divinity?
A52291	Now what sense is there generally in Mens Excuses, when they are resolved to do an ill thing, and want something to say for the doing of it?
A52291	Now, is this the Explication that agrees to a Syllable, both to the Holy Scripture, and the Church of England?
A52291	Now, what can the Authour draw from this?
A52291	Now, what should all this gladness and rejoicing be for?
A52291	Or else how come they to make use of that pretty distinction of a God by Nature, and a God by Office?
A52291	Quid sibi saxa cavatae, Quid pulchra volunt monimentae?
A52291	The Question was put, whether they believed in Homo- ousium or in Christ?
A52291	The Sun is a glorious Body, and the more we strive to pry into its Constitution by gazing on it, the more we are blinded; and what then?
A52291	V. Why Faith made a greater Figure under the Gospel, than it did under the Law?
A52291	Well, but the Authour says, if the Trinity be a Mystery, why should we dispute any longer about it?
A52291	Well, but what is this to the Union of Spirits, or rational Beings?
A52291	What Changes or Additions latter Ages have made in Matters of Faith?
A52291	What alterations or additions have after Ages made in it?
A52291	What figure Faith made in natural Religion?
A52291	What if ye shall see the Son of Man ascend up where he was before?
A52291	What natural Faith is?
A52291	What say you, O blessed Paul?
A52291	What was that Gospel which our Lord and his Apostles preached as necessary to be believed?
A52291	What was the Gospel which our Saviour and his Apostles preached?
A52291	Whether it is not promised to the Belief of the true God?
A52291	Whom of his stamp did he find there, that he could dare to communicate such a Book to?
A52291	Why has not he whom the Father has sanctified,& c. a better claim to this Title?
A52291	Will he allow, that Arius, and Euzoius, and Eusebius of Caesarea,& c. were only playing the Fools, whilst they were drawing up their Creeds?
A52291	With what tolerable sense can an action be said to speak?
A52291	Would not this be as good a Conclusion to all intents and purposes?
A52291	are the Orthodox to blame that asserted it, or the Hereticks that denied it?
A52291	are there Two Wills, and Two kinds of Operations, or but One?
A52291	because our Eyes are so weak that we can not stare into the Furnace of the Sun, must we therefore take it for a Candle?
A52291	but what if the relation between the written word and the rational consequence, be so remote, that none but a skilful Herald can drive its Pedigree?
A52291	don''t we know the Sun when we see it for all this?
A52291	is this the putting the old Materials into a new and better Frame, which he so boasts of?
A52291	or who else does he mean by this We?
A52291	† Now what is that which is in the graves, but only the Bodies of Men?
A52291	† Quid unquam aliud Conciliorum decretis enisa est Ecclesia, nisi ut quod antea simpliciter credebatur hoc idem postea diligentius crederetur?
A52291	† Testimoniorum quae sunt genera?
A38042	& c. To coakse the Mob he prophanely brings in that place of Scripture, Have any of the Rulers believ''d in him?
A38042	4. Who but the Vindicator could imagine that these Evangelical Doctrines are not Necessary Matter of Faith to Christian Men?
A38042	AND now, to prove yet further the Pernicious Nature of his Writings, doth any man doubt of their Tendency to Irreligion and Atheisin?
A38042	Again, granting that the Epistles were all of them writ to those that already believed, yet what can this be to his purpose?
A38042	And O how he grins at the Spirit of Creed- making?
A38042	And are not these Truths the proper Object of our Faith now under the Gospel, they so peculiarly belonging to the doctrine and belief of the Messias?
A38042	And do not these foresaid Texts, which we find in St. Paul''s Epistles, acquaint us with the true Source and Quality of our condition by nature?
A38042	And how indeed can they be?
A38042	And is not the Reader satisfied that such language as this hath real Truth in it?
A38042	And is there no Atheism in this?
A38042	And is this set down to no purpose in these Inspired Epistles?
A38042	And must he tell the world that the Iesuitical Writers take the part of the Socinians?
A38042	And where can we be inform''d concerning the Rise and Nature of this Evil, but in the Sacred and Inspired Writings?
A38042	And who could do this but a man that was wholly careless of his Credit, and did not care how he acted?
A38042	And why may we not distinguish between these and the Occasional Matters as well as between the Others and them?
A38042	And why should not every one of these Evangelical Truths( which is another thing he puts into his Question) be believed and imbraced?
A38042	Are we not particularly and expresly told by St. Luke that he writ his Gospel to the most Excellent Theophilus?
A38042	But I ask, Why had we not a hint( one gentle hint at least) of this in all his Book?
A38042	But he deridingly cries out What will become of me, that I have not mention''d SATISFACTION?
A38042	But was it not judiciously said by this Writer that it is well for the Compilers of the Creed that they lived not in my days?
A38042	But what is this that he hath to say of my Booksellers?
A38042	But what need I, Good Sir, do this, when you have done it your self?
A38042	But when doth he do this?
A38042	But who doth not wonder more at his Insincerity, that he should act thus?
A38042	But who sees not that hereby they depress Christianity, and unspeakably injure the Faith of the Gospel?
A38042	But who sees not that this is a mere Elusion?
A38042	Can there be a more extravagant way of talking than this?
A38042	Can this Writer himself consider this, and not blush?
A38042	Can we believe in him, and yet not believe these Great things which are brought to light by his preaching the Gospel?
A38042	Did he not, when he writ to the Galatians assert the doctrine of Justification through faith in Christ''s Righteousness, without the Works of the Law?
A38042	Do we not know that the Four Gospels were Writ to and for Believers as well as Vnbelievers?
A38042	Do you not hereby proclaim to the world that you will put off the Reader with any idle and groundless Conceit of your own?
A38042	Doth he not perceive that the discarding of all the Articles but One makes way for the casting off that too?
A38042	Doth not this plainly shew that this is All that is requir''d to be believ''d as Necessary to make a man a Christian?
A38042	For I ask, what was the end of his being sent?
A38042	How impossible then is it for himself to know his heart?
A38042	How the Second and Third Persons can be Self- existent?
A38042	How then come you, Mr. Examinator, to invent these things for him?
A38042	Is it not enough to rob us of our God, by denying Christ to be so, but must they spoil us of all the Other Articles of Christian Faith but One?
A38042	Is it not reasonable that a Christian should( as the Apostle speaks of himself) know whom he hath believed?
A38042	Is it not requisite that we should know it and believe it?
A38042	Might not the Apostle, yea did he not in his Epistles to these Persons remind them of the Great Articles of the Christian Faith?
A38042	Must no Believers have any Fundamentals taught them?
A38042	Must not this then be his Lasting Character that he hath in his Writings demonstated himself to be not only a Socinian, but a False hearted one?
A38042	Nay, did they not require Assent to them?
A38042	Now, Sir, you with your Reasonableness of Christianity, what do you think of this?
A38042	Suppose they have forgot the Fundamentals, or have corrupted and perverted them?
A38042	The use of it, and that in the very way that I have applied it, is to be found in Scripture: Art thou the first man that was born?
A38042	This takes up 18 or 19 whole Pages: and why?
A38042	Was it not enough, I say, to do all this( which loudly proclaims him a Socinian) but must he also hold the world in hand that he is none?
A38042	Was it not that those they writ to might give their Assent to them?
A38042	Was it not to Help Mankind, to rescue and deliver them from some Evil?
A38042	Were ye baptised in the name of Paul?
A38042	What a weak and pitiful Consequence is this?
A38042	What dost thou chiefly learn in these Articles of thy Belief?
A38042	What is the meaning of Catechizing, which hath been so universally commended and practised by the Ancients?
A38042	What is there that he will not take hold of to be Sportive and Gamesome?
A38042	What is there that this Gentleman will not turn into Ridicule or Falsity?
A38042	What need we have any other part of the New Testament?
A38042	What shall we say then to such men as these who will vouch any thing?
A38042	What shall we say to such an Oblivious Author as this?
A38042	What shall we say?
A38042	Who but a Socinian can believe this?
A38042	Who could do this but a Socinianiz''d Writer?
A38042	Why did the Apostles write these Doctrines?
A38042	Why is this sometimes urged without the mentioning of any other Article of Belief?
A38042	Why must he be said to be the Ablest Defender when we can name so many Eminent Writers in other Countreys that have perform''d this task?
A38042	Would not a Man be hooted at for such Arguing as this?
A38042	Yea, is not this absolutely requisite?
A38042	as our First Parent Adam?
A38042	for what is excluding them wholly but defying them?
A38042	had he not enough of the Quaker but he must bring in the Iesuite?
A38042	must he publickly give notice that they both carry on the same work, and joyntly conspire to pervert the Scriptures in order to it?
A38042	of Christ''s Coming) which all Christians( especially Socinian Christians) are agreed in?
A38042	that Iesus is the Messias or Christ, is so often repeated in the New Testament?
A38042	the Apostacy of Adam( for he is that one Man) and the dreadful Consequences of it, expressed by Death and Wrath?
A38042	the Bishop) say, God must be from himself, or self- originated?
A38042	was this only to teach One Article of Faith?
A59811	And are they not already concluded by the Articles, Liturgy, Homilies,& c. which he says our Adversaries can not alter?
A59811	And did the Dean charge him with any thing more?
A59811	And has not that School Divinity enough in it?
A59811	And how comes he to know his thoughts?
A59811	And if we may do this, Why is it not seasonable to do it now Hereticks are so busy in perverting the true sense of Scripture?
A59811	And then Calvin disliked it also; but so he did Episcopacy; and will he think that a sufficient ground to censure our Reformers for retaining it?
A59811	And whether that were a good reason not to dispute for the Being of a God, because Atheists denied it?
A59811	And who desires him to do more?
A59811	Are they not his Friends who move these Ancient Boundaries of Peace?
A59811	Basil did dye after one Council only had sat, did not the rest there named live and write after more Councils than one had sat?
A59811	But after all, How would this put an End to these Controversies?
A59811	But ca n''t he believe what Reason and Divine Revelation Di ● tate?
A59811	But can he never be sure of this in any Texts that have been Controverted?
A59811	But does a God Incarnate signify any more, but that he who is Incarnate is God?
A59811	But does he really think the Church desires no man to believe the Creeds, and particularly the Doctrine of the Trinity, but only not to oppose them?
A59811	But have we not whole Systems of Opinions now a- days made up into Confessions of Faith?
A59811	But if this were all, Do our Socinians observe this?
A59811	But is there not the same reason of it, as of those things that are?
A59811	But let us see how he makes it good, What then, do you think of a t ● cit connivance at their stay at home?
A59811	But must nothing be done, from whence bad men may take occasion to be Hypocrites?
A59811	But then I pray, what is the Latitude in an Vnit, considered as an Unit?
A59811	But then, What do you think of a tacit Connivance quietly to come to our Congregations?
A59811	But to what purpose are these Citations?
A59811	But what has he to answer this Authority?
A59811	But what is all this to the Publick Constitutions of a Church, and the Laws of Communion?
A59811	But what is this to our purpose?
A59811	But what of all this?
A59811	Can any thinking man say so?
A59811	Did he do that, only that he might have liberty to Ridicule and Expose it?
A59811	Doth she indeed hand them to us merely as her own Determinations?
A59811	For if I confess that God is Almighty in the most express terms that can be imagined, may I not for all that affirm, that he is not Just or Good?
A59811	For in this present Controversy what had he to do with their other Errors?
A59811	He could assign many words pitch''d upon from time to time, to guard the Faith and prick the fingers of Hereticks,& c. What then?
A59811	However, he is so great a Lover of Peace( why then does he quarrel so much with the Orthodox Writers, and the Church of England?)
A59811	I would ask him also, Whether he did not Address to all Learned Writers against the Socinians in this Conttoversy, as well as to the Dean?
A59811	If Dr. Sherlock does not argue well, must no body therefore write, that can argue better?
A59811	If his Hypothesis be unreasonable, is it therefore unreasonable to write in Defence of the Doctrine of the Trinity?
A59811	If our Author answers this too with a Why not?
A59811	Is it then to no purpose to teach men the Truth, because they may put upon us, and say they believe it when they do not?
A59811	Is it to no purpose to require men to profess their minds sincerely, because we can not always be sure whether they do or no?
A59811	Is not this agreeable to the common form of speech?
A59811	Nay, and is not what follows, Censuring our Litany and the Compilers of it?
A59811	No doubt but he has: What then?
A59811	Now what is this to the design of his Book, to persuade men not to Write in Defence of the Doctrine of the Trinity?
A59811	Now who can tell what he means by merely her Determinations?
A59811	Or do they contradict them?
A59811	Or is the Doctrine it self unreasonable?
A59811	Pray what''s the matter now?
A59811	Pray who are they that will not l ● t it rest?
A59811	They are only some Reflections on his Answer to an Objection started by himself in these Words, shall we tamely by a base silence give up the Point?
A59811	This he very roundly answers, and utterly confutes, with a short Why not?
A59811	Was the dispute, whether the Dean should write in defence of the Doctrine of the Trinity, or whether the Doctrine of the Trinity should be defended?
A59811	Why does not he first persuade them to comply thus far, before he desires us not to defend the Church''s Doctrine?
A59811	Why then may we not Write in Defence of the Doctrine of the Trinity, and show what is the true sense of Scripture in that Point?
A59811	Why then, Must they not be obeyed?
A59811	Will his Socinian Friends submit to it?
A59811	Will the Socinians be generally Converted any more than they are by Learned mens Writings now?
A59811	Will they admit Socinian Opinions?
A59811	Will they leave off making Proselytes to their Heretical Opinions?
A59811	Will they then not say a word against the Doctrine of the Trinity, nor endeavour to spread their Errors any farther?
A59811	Will this justify the writing of that Piece?
A59811	and the fittest persons a Committee chosen by that great and reverend Assembly?
A59811	must we all pass contentedly for Socinians in the eye of the world, and be afraid to say we are none?
A59811	or if they do, will he give us leave to Oppose them and Defend the Truth?
A51837	53.8, He shall be taken from prison and judgement; therefore Man: yet who shall declare his generation?
A51837	According to what nature doth this office belong to Christ, Divine or Humane?
A51837	All things were made by him: What, all without exception?
A51837	And are not these great Points?
A51837	And how by him?
A51837	And must this Religion that condemneth all frauds, and doing evil that good may come of it be supported by a lye?
A51837	And that ye put on the New man which after God is created in Righteousness and true Holiness?
A51837	And what blessing was that?
A51837	Believe ye that I am able to do this?
A51837	Besides, if he had it then how could he want it now?
A51837	But how do we receive this atonement?
A51837	But how is he infinite, if he hath onely a finite Nature, such as a mere Creature hath?
A51837	But why was a Ransom necessary?
A51837	Did God ever speak to him, or appear to him?
A51837	Did the Winds and Seas obey Christ?
A51837	Did they do this by command of God?
A51837	For the first objection, how was Christ the first, since many were raised before him?
A51837	God is offended, and what peace can they have?
A51837	Hath God said?
A51837	He that brought such multitudes of creatures out of the dark Chaos, hath he forgotten what is become of our dust?
A51837	He that gave Life and Being to that which before was not, can not he raise the dead?
A51837	He that made the world out of nothing, can not he raise the dead?
A51837	He was God: What did he then do?
A51837	His Attributes yours, his Providences yours, his Promises yours, what may not you promise your selves from him?
A51837	His Kingly Office: How can that be exercised without an Infinite Power?
A51837	How can a Magistrate be said to forgive an offender, when the offender beareth the punishment, which the Law determineth?
A51837	How he made all things?
A51837	How he made all things?
A51837	How he received this Doctrine from the Father?
A51837	How is Christ an Head to this Body?
A51837	How is it a part or fruit of Redemption?
A51837	How was he the first- born?
A51837	If God be your God, why should you be troubled?''
A51837	If he were not perswaded of it, would he say to Christ, My Lord, and my God?
A51837	If it were not by his express commandment, would he suffer such an attempt to go unpunished?
A51837	If the Fear of God be true Wisdom, to whom should we seek for it, but from the Wise God?
A51837	In the beginning; where was the Word?
A51837	Iohn begins his Gospel with the dignity of Christs Person, and how doth he set it forth?
A51837	Is there any time, or manner, or speech noted by the Evangelists when God made this Revelation?
A51837	Is there any work which the one doth, but the other can not do?
A51837	It concerns us much to see whether we be in peace or trouble, if in trouble you see the cure, if in peace the next question is, is it Gods peace?
A51837	It should be a check to our sluggishness, and mispense of Time: doth God now continue me?
A51837	Now can not he put our disordered souls in frame again?
A51837	Now shall we doubt of it?
A51837	Now this should strike our hearts?
A51837	Now what is a divine, and infinite Power if this be not?
A51837	Now who can convert himself, or chang ● his own heart?
A51837	Now who could do all this but God?
A51837	Or how could his finite Nature, without change and conversion into another Nature, be made infinite?
A51837	Secondly, Why the Creation of Angels is so particularly mentioned and insisted upon?
A51837	Shall poor worms make bold with his Laws, slight his doctrine, despise his benefits?
A51837	That Christ as Creator beareth such Affection to man as the work of his hands: Is it good unto thee that thou shouldst despise the work of thy hands?
A51837	Then the creature would be independent, and whether God will or no they would conserve their being, and then how should God Govern the World?
A51837	Thirdly, How is this an evidence and assurance to all good Christians, of their happy and glorious Resurrection?
A51837	Thirdly, Why the Creation of Angels is so particularly and expresly mentioned?
A51837	Thou hast layed the burden of all this people upon me, have I conceived this people?
A51837	To whom then will ye liken God?
A51837	Was it a personal priviledge peculiar to them only?
A51837	We are still sinning against God, either we are omiting good, or committing evil, what will we do if we be not forgiven?
A51837	Well then before any creature was Christ had a divine Glory, how had it he?
A51837	What are the parts of his headship?
A51837	What can the Father do which the Son can not do also?
A51837	What is Redemption by the blood of Christ?
A51837	What light can we see in a Candle when the Sun shineth in his full strength?
A51837	What matter is it whether I be a Dog or a Man, a Beast or an Angel, if I serve not the end for which I was made?
A51837	What reverence do we owe to him who is our Creator and Preserver as well as Redeemer?
A51837	What shall I say?
A51837	What this Reconciliation is?
A51837	When did he make the angels?
A51837	When he made the Angels?
A51837	Who can interpret these speeches and A ● ● ributes, but of one who is God- Man?
A51837	Why this Excellency of our Redeemer should be so deeply impressed upon our minds and hearts?
A51837	Why this should be much upon our minds and hearts?
A51837	Will Christ fail us?
A51837	You glory in your Riches, and preeminence now, but how long will you do so?
A51837	Your own Resurrection, what may facilitate our belief and hope of it?
A51837	and to raise men to those inclinations, and affections to which nature is an utter stranger?
A51837	by the Creation of the World, by the Eternal Word; and what he saith, is an answer to these questions, When was the Word?
A51837	can Ministers Preach, Print, too much of them?
A51837	can private Christian Hear, Read, Meditate too much of them?
A51837	containing the very vitals of Gospel Revelation?
A51837	he did not answer as Iacob did to Rachel,( when she said, Give me children or I dye) Am I in the place of God?
A51837	of a very sublime nature?
A51837	or Abraham see him?
A51837	or can not God govern the World without countenancing such a deceit?
A51837	or how are we interessed in it?
A51837	or is it possible that such Holy persons as our Lord Jesus and his Apostles were, could be guilty of such an Imposture?
A51837	or what likeness will ye compare unto him?
A51837	the first- fruits?
A51837	the first- raised from the Dead?
A51837	to have a Divine Nature put into us?
A51837	to what end and purpose?
A51837	was he not still the Image of God in our nature?
A51837	what is there among all the Creatures that can be like such an infinite and almighty essense?
A51837	what shall we do?
A51837	when he sitteth at the right hand of God, till he hath made his ● oes his Footstool?
A51837	who shall make us of unclean to become pure and holy?
A51837	with God; what was the Word?
A51837	would he witness from Heaven this is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased?
A51837	〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉, what then shall we understand by things in heaven?
A38033	11?
A38033	13. which are spoken of the general Resurrection at the last day?
A38033	15 But could he thus speak if the Racovian Position be true, that the Punishment allotted to the wicked at the last day is their Utter Dissolution?
A38033	21. and not acknowledg this?
A38033	5. and can any but Volkelius imagine that* this Form of Speech signifies that they shall be punished, if they be guilty of such and such Crimes?
A38033	And can he do so if they that have done all the Mischief imaginable to others, shall feel none themselves here or hereafter?
A38033	And do we question then whether there will be this Judicial Action, which we properly call Judging or Trying?
A38033	And if they be not deeply concerned for that which is their Darling Point, what can we think of them as to the rest?
A38033	And is not the same Atheistick Tang discernible in their denying God''s Foreknowledge of future Contingencies?
A38033	And must it not be the same if it be Annihilation?
A38033	And now who would not think that Paedobaptism were wholly discarded by the Socinians, and that they can not with a safe Conscience allow of it?
A38033	And shall we silently and tamely permit this?
A38033	And there is an Inward one, but what is that?
A38033	And what is the reason?
A38033	And what saith their famous Master?
A38033	And who could expect any other thing?
A38033	And who will not add, that this is the high Road to Atheism?
A38033	And why then do the persons I am speaking of, whilst they follow the Example of the Romanists, seem to condemn them?
A38033	Are these the men that talk and write against the Superstition and Idolatry of the Church of Rome as well as that of Pagans?
A38033	Are they not hereby confirm''d in their dislike and contempt of what is Sacred?
A38033	Are they not to be deem''d very slippery Gentlemen when they thus say, and unsay?
A38033	Are we not sure that there are some Irish as well as English ingaged in the service?
A38033	Bold strike in with this Company, and vote this Writer to be the Christianissimo( next to LOUIS) of this Age?
A38033	But are the English Socinians of this mind?
A38033	But are the English and Modern Gentlemen of the same opinion?
A38033	But can we be so uncharitable as to think that the Unitarians of our times are guilty of this?
A38033	But have they nothing to reply?
A38033	But how can he do this if he hath no knwledg of them?
A38033	But how can they deny God''s Prescience of Futurities when it is made the Peculiar Character of the Deity?
A38033	But how derogatory is it to the Excellent and Perfect Nature of the Deity?
A38033	But how do our late Penmen approve of this?
A38033	But shall we believe the Racovian Catechism or St. Paul''s words?
A38033	But they alledg another Text, What and if ye shall see the Son of Man ascended up where he was before?
A38033	But what can be more contrary to those discoveries which are made to us in the Sacred and Inspired Writings?
A38033	But what if this Fable be in Scripture?
A38033	But what then?
A38033	But when this writer saith these men of Art are in an Evil Conspiracy, what is the meaning of that?
A38033	But who are these Men of Art?
A38033	But would you know what is the true reason of their slighting and undervaluing this Royal Penman who dictated all by an Infallible Spirit?
A38033	Can his Care and Providence be exercised about them, and yet he be wholly Ignorant of them?
A38033	Can the condition of some persons be more tolerable than that of others, if their Punishment be the very Same?
A38033	Can we think it is not necessarily included, though it be not expressed?
A38033	Can we think then that the Gospel of St. John was writ against Cerinthus, and yet that Cerinthus writ it?
A38033	Do not these men talk like Infidels?
A38033	Doth the Great Ruler of the world shew himself Just if they be neither punish''d in this life( as often it happens) nor in another?
A38033	Have there not been seen strange Outlandish Books at the Press of late?
A38033	How few are there at this day that can endure sound doctrine?
A38033	How high an affront is this to the Divine Majesty, that he should allow and approve of these Impurities and Immoralities?
A38033	How then can it be said by these Writers that the Image of God wherein our first Parents were created did not consist in Sanctity and Righteousness?
A38033	How then can these men challenge the name of Christians?
A38033	How unreasonably then do the Socinian Writers cry out against this Just and Wise Dispensation of Heaven?
A38033	If their Ethicks be so depraved, what can we think of their Christianity?
A38033	If they shall say( and what will they not say)?
A38033	If this in them was counted an approach to Atheism, why may it not be reckon''d as such in the persons I am speaking of?
A38033	In a word, can it be thought that they speak and think of God as if they had a real belief of him?
A38033	In short, shall they neither be punish''d here, nor hereafter?
A38033	Is it not said, he will bring every work into Judgment, with every secret thing, whether it be good, or whether it be evil?
A38033	Is not Crellius''s Stock somewhere harbour''d among them?
A38033	Is not here again a plain siding with the Roman Doctors, and their Device of Merit and Perfection?
A38033	Is not here an Example set them for this purpose, and do we not see it daily followed?
A38033	Is not here then 〈 ◊ 〉 great defect of Religious Principles?
A38033	Is not the Transaction of the Last day represented to us as a Formal Judiciary Process?
A38033	Is there not need of the inward gift of the Holy Spirit that we may believe the Gospel?
A38033	Is this the Language of one that hath a due respect and reverence for the Scriptures?
A38033	Likewise, who sees not that the Providence of God extends it self to this sort of future actions and occurrences?
A38033	May we not suspect some Transylvanians and Polanders employ''d in the work lately?
A38033	Must they only be deprived of their beings, and at the same time of the sense of all that is painful or hurtful?
A38033	Need I now come with my old Charge?
A38033	Now, will not any rational and considerate man infer hence that our English Socinians are very cold and unconcerned in their Religion?
A38033	Or is this all their Punishment, not to suffer any?
A38033	Or, can they be Infallible, and yet Err?
A38033	Shall not the Judg of all the World do right?
A38033	Shall these men then be call''d Rational( tho I know none call them so but themselves and their Admirers) who assert the contrary?
A38033	Shall we then think it impossible for him to resuscitate the same body, though we should grant it to have been for a time annihilated?
A38033	Take away this, and what a Damp is there to Vertue and Religion?
A38033	Take it thus with the preceding verse, which will lead us to the true sense of it, Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ?
A38033	That this is the will of God we learn from the Sacred Writ: and where can it be learnt but there?
A38033	This is the Divinity of the Socinians, and who can expect any Moral Truths from them when they discourse after this manner?
A38033	To what end and purpose do Reprobates rise again, and are brought to Judgment, if there shall immediately follow an utter Extinction of them?
A38033	What is this but bringing down this Inspit''d Author to the same level with Plato and Seneca, or any other honest Moralist?
A38033	What means this giving and delivering up the dead in those places, unless the very same bodies that fell are to rise?
A38033	What shall we think of these Socinian Writers that discourse after this rate?
A38033	What strange Contradiction is this, to reckon our Saviour as a Fictitious God, and yet to pretend to venerate him as a True one?
A38033	What therefore is it that these men will not say or do, if they have a mind to it?
A38033	What think you of those words of the ‖ Ring- leader of the Party?
A38033	What will the Impious Despisers of Religion, what will the Atheists say to this?
A38033	Whence then have these Men Authority to suffer the observation of the Lord''s day, since they themselves vouch the utter Abolishing of it?
A38033	Where then is their Infallibility, which hath been owned by all Christian Churches?
A38033	Whereupon I ask him, is this belief necessary to make a Man a Christian, or not?
A38033	Whither shall I go from thy Spirit?
A38033	Who but Faustus Socinus would have believ''d this?
A38033	Who can read that remarkable passage of the Psalmist, and not believe this?
A38033	Who knows where to have this People?
A38033	Who will not say( and that on just grounds) that here is more than a Vergency to that cursed genius which I have before mention''d?
A38033	Why is this said but to shake the belief of the Soul''s Immortality, and to make men stagger about this Important Point?
A38033	Why then are we nice in distinguishing, when they are not differenc''d as to their work and design?
A38033	Would not a Thinking Man be induced to believe that they are at the bottom Favourers of the Pontifician Interest?
A38033	Would you know the Reason of it?
A38033	and who but a Well- willer to Atheism would have broach''d it?
A38033	and yet will there be no Judging?
A38033	how can it with truth be said by them that there was no Positive Moral Goodness and Rectitude in them?
A38033	i ● … not here a demonstration of the Impio ● … Disposition of their Minds?
A38033	if these Fundamental Principles be overthrown, what a wretched state will Religion and the Professors of it be reduced to?
A38033	must it therefore be counted Unreasonable and Incredible?
A38033	or whither shall I flee from thy presence?
A38033	when they vouch the most Immoral actions to have been lawful all the time till our Saviour''s coming?
A38033	where is the head that hath no Chimaera''s in it?
A50867	& c. But I ask, How does that appear?
A50867	15. allow them to be clear Truths?
A50867	31. he mentions only these?
A50867	32. and other places of Scripture?
A50867	36, 37, 38, 39, 40?
A50867	6. doth he not plainly imply, that there is a Knowledge less certain?
A50867	62. in these I am; is an Answer only to this Question, Art thou then the Son of God?
A50867	7. that they shall be condemn''d only for working Iniquity, and not for Unbelief?
A50867	Again, Where was there any such Code that Mankind might have recourse to as their unerring Rule, before our Saviour''s time?
A50867	Also, how can he say as he doth, that Vice and Blame every where go together?
A50867	And after all, what is this to us who live now?
A50867	And can they be clear Truths, and yet not certain?
A50867	And can we not conceive an Image that doth not include Matter?
A50867	And doth he not also repeat it, When this corruptible,& c.?
A50867	And is it not as clear from hence as any thing possibly can be, that they had some Principles or Communes notitiae written in their Hearts?
A50867	And may we not likewise ask him where it is, that the Lord Herbert mentions Innate Principles or Innate Impressions?
A50867	And when Pilate ask''d him, whether he was a King?
A50867	Are all that call themselves Christians, agreed as to all the other Advantages which he mentions?
A50867	As there was a time before the Son of God was incarnate or cloath''d with Flesh, so hath he after his Incarnation ceas''d to be cloath''d with it?
A50867	Besides, how can it be worth the while to enquire after the Rule of reputed Vertue?
A50867	But I ask, How had it been shewn?
A50867	But afterwards he proposes the Question, Whether these Americans liv''d without any Religion?
A50867	But against whom doth he say this?
A50867	But how appears it that he is call''d so as Man?
A50867	But how doth he prove that it denoted the Person of our Saviour as a proper Name?
A50867	But how will he hence make good this Inference, Therefore, of these two, Believing and Repenting, one alone is oft put for both?
A50867	But in what Words doth the Apostle appeal to common Repute?
A50867	But now what would he gather from this?
A50867	But will he hold to this, that St. John knew nothing else requir''d to be believ''d, and admit of no Limitation, or Exception?
A50867	Can there be an universal Consent, when besides particular Persons, there are whole Nations that do not consent?
A50867	Certainty, doth not perfectly agree to them?
A50867	Dei, l. 19. c. 1. speak of two hundred eighty eight Sects or several Opinions concerning it?
A50867	Did he not know that it was necessary to believe One Only True God?
A50867	Did he not know that it was necessary to believe, that God rais''d the Lord Jesus from the dead?
A50867	Doth this, that it is the best Worship of God, amount to no more than this, that God is pleased with it?
A50867	For why may we not argue as strongly for the universal Pastorship from the latter Words, as from the former?
A50867	He says he does by no means deny it, but does he believe it?
A50867	How appears it that these are Solomon''s Words, and not the Sayings of others, which Solomon only repeats?
A50867	How knows he, that there are not some other Epistles which were not written after twenty years after Christ''s Ascension?
A50867	How was this executed?
A50867	I die daily, may we not suppose that he had respect to the Afflictions and Sufferings that came daily upon him for the sake of Christ?
A50867	I would ask him, Whether the Jews understood not this Appellation, the Son of God, so as that it denoted the Person so call''d to be God?
A50867	IT will possibly he ask''d, What Advantage have we by Jesus Christ?
A50867	If he do not deny it, why doth he dispute so earnestly against it?
A50867	If he thought this a sufficient Answer to others, why should it not be a sufficient Answer to him?
A50867	If they had not understood that by owning himself to be the Son of God he had made himself God, how could they say that he blasphem''d?
A50867	If this was the true Reason, Why did it not restrain him from mentioning other things wherein he, and some that are called Christians, do not agree?
A50867	If thou thinkest that the whole Church was built upon Peter alone, what wilt thou say of John the Son of Thunder, and every one of the Apostles?
A50867	Is it his Meaning, that the eternal Son of God, the second Person in the Trinity, was cloath''d with Flesh?
A50867	Is it probable that Solomon would affirm absolutely, as his own Sense, that Man hath no Pre- eminence above a Beast?
A50867	Is it then in the Words, whatsoever is of good Report, that he appeals to it?
A50867	Is not the Word Death taken in this Sense in other places of Scripture?
A50867	It may be enquir''d also, what he means by that Expression, Whilst cloathed in Flesh?
A50867	Lock give of this his strange Assertion, that the fore- mention''d Proposition is of very little use in Humane Life?
A50867	Lock himself confute this Notion concerning the Obscurity of Words, when he faith that Christ brought Life and Immortality to light by the Gospel?
A50867	Lock means by the vastly greater Majority of Mankind?
A50867	Lock must either retract this, that''t is plain out of S. Luke that Art thou the Messiah?
A50867	Lock often saith they are?
A50867	Lock plainly makes Art thou the Son of God?
A50867	Lock prove that those were writ after thirty years from our Saviour''s Ascension?
A50867	Lock say that he was not cloath''d with it after his Resurrection?
A50867	Lock say that the general Resurrection is not spoken of in these Places?
A50867	Lock say that the points of natural Religion were so seldom controverted?
A50867	Lock say that there are few deprav''d to that degree as not to condemn in others the faults they themselves are guilty of?
A50867	Lock says that this Proposition is fit to be inculcated: But on whom is it to be inculcated?
A50867	Lock to this?
A50867	Lock too severe in pronouncing them to be of no use at all, unless the particular Measures and Bounds of all Vertues and Vices were innate Principles?
A50867	Lock when he says, The Son of God was cloath''d with flesh?
A50867	Lock''s Mind in thinking, are they material?
A50867	May not this be comprehended under the word Death, Gen. 2.?
A50867	Might he not call him the Image of the invisible God, as God; and the first- born of every Creature, as Man?
A50867	Must it not be a most manifest wrong Judgment that does not presently see to which side in this Case the Preference is to be given?
A50867	No man will say that Art thou the Christ?
A50867	Now I ask, What is it that is rais''d in Incorruption, in Glory, in Power, and a Spiritual Body?
A50867	Or is Creeds put for Creed by the Mistake of the Press?
A50867	Or why are the Rewards of another Life of weight enough to determine the Choice against the Pleasures of this, but because they are the greater Good?
A50867	Section?
A50867	Shall we dare to say that the Gates of Hell could not prevail against St. Peter only, but could prevail against the rest?
A50867	Should it be put into Form, how strangely would it look?
A50867	So as to Man''s chief Good or Happiness, were there no Controversies, no diversity of Opinions, about that?
A50867	THE Faith for which God justified Abraham, what was it?
A50867	The Apostles were to teach adult Persons before they baptiz''d them; and what were they to teach them?
A50867	There he allows this Proposition to be a clear Truth; but how could he pronounce it to be a clear Truth, if he did not understand the Terms of it?
A50867	They had a Belief of the Messiah to come?
A50867	They may perhaps also ask, Whether all that do not actually oppose the Being of a God, or not actually disbelieve it, do consent to it?
A50867	Were not the several Sects of Philosophers divided about these things as well as about others?
A50867	What can be more plain?
A50867	What can be more plain?
A50867	What is this, upon this Rock I will build my Church?
A50867	What says he in his Third Letter to this?
A50867	What thinks he of a Death of Afflictions, outward Sufferings and Calamities?
A50867	When S. Paul says of himself, that he was in Deaths oft, may we not interpret it in Sufferings oft?
A50867	When shall the Saviour the Lord Christ effect this wonderful Change, that our vile Body shall be made conformable to his glorious Body?
A50867	Whether he were the Messiah?
A50867	Which made them all cry out, Art thou then the Son of God?
A50867	Why doth he endeavour, to the utmost of his Power, to baffle the Arguments that are urged for the Proof of it?
A50867	Why then doth he that himself, which he condemns in others?
A50867	Will he say then, that we owe them to the Superstition of a Nurse, or the Authority of an Old Woman, or our Educations?
A50867	Will he say, that Men shall not be condemn''d for their Impenitence?
A50867	Withal, how appears it, that one of them alone is oft put for both?
A50867	Yea, doth not our Saviour himself, and likewise the Apostles, urge several Duties in the Words of the Old Testament, and making use of its Authority?
A50867	You will say, Is it not impossible to admit of the making any thing out of nothing, since we can not possibly conceive it?
A50867	and Art thou the Messiah?
A50867	and Art thou the Son of God?
A50867	and Art thou the Son of God?
A50867	and not to that other, Art thou the Messiah?
A50867	and, Art thou the Messiah?
A50867	behold ye have now heard his Blasphemy?
A50867	i. e. Dost thou then own thy self to be the Messiah?
A50867	i. e. Dost thou then own thy self to be the Messiah?
A50867	or if it did, doth that prove that it is us''d as a proper Name in those places of the Acts?
A50867	p. 29. he seems to complain of those that blam''d him for contending for one Article?
A50867	take notice of the various Sentiments about it?
A50867	that it is nothing else but our Opinion,& c.?
A50867	who shall deliver me?)
A49796	1. Who spake?
A49796	25?
A49796	4. Who made them by him?
A49796	All these significations are here intended: But to whom is he so convenient, profitable, necessary?
A49796	And again they said, Now therefore why should we dy?
A49796	And again, The Cup which my Father hath give ● me, shall I not drink it?
A49796	And how can these purge the conscience?
A49796	And how careful will they be in case of all means, which conduce to this perseverance?
A49796	And how merciful must he needs be, that was tempted himself?
A49796	And how much is this silly and unworthy Creature honoured?
A49796	And how should we?
A49796	And is his coming so certain, and so speedy, and hath God said so?
A49796	And shall he endure, and we be impatient under so light a burden?
A49796	And shall he, so far more excellent then we are, endure so long, so patiently, from such unworthy persons, so vile, and so much contradiction?
A49796	And shall it trouble us to part with that which one day, and we know not how soon, must be taken from us?
A49796	And shall the word of the eternal Son of God be disobeyed, and any Offender guilty in this particular escape everlasting penalties?
A49796	And shall we reject it?
A49796	And shall we so unworthy, not endure far less?
A49796	And that his Argument might be more forcing, he proposeth it interrogatively, To which of the Angels said he at any time?
A49796	And to whom sware He, that they should not enter into His Rest?]
A49796	And what shall I more say?
A49796	And where do we find political representation, for Power and Lordship signified in Scripture by such terms?
A49796	And why should be fear the Tryal, or, upon the Tryal, Damnation or eternal Death?
A49796	And why should the thoughts of bearing his Reproach torment our minds?
A49796	And why should this voluntary Humiliation be either any the least derogation from the Excellency of Christ?
A49796	And why?
A49796	And will any man imagine that the Apostle in so few words so full of different matter would tautologize?
A49796	Are our Sufferings comparable to his?
A49796	Are we stronger then He?
A49796	But by what Warrant, and according to what Rule, did these Priest receive Tythes of their Brethren?
A49796	But how and by what was this signified?
A49796	But how did Isaac thus bless his Sons?
A49796	But how guilty are we of neglect?
A49796	But if Christ did not glorify himself, and take upon him to be a Priest, how did he acquire his Sacerdotal Power?
A49796	But suppose it should signify sometimes, ● ay often, to take away; doth it follow from thence that therefore it must so signify here?
A49796	But suppose we come, what may we expect, or what shall we receive?
A49796	But the Question is, To whom he bowed?
A49796	But thirdly, What Covenant is this?
A49796	But thirdly, Why is this Clause added and inserted?
A49796	But what are these Duties exhorted unto?
A49796	But what kind of Comparison is this?
A49796	But what might be the cause of this dulness?
A49796	But what moved him to do this?
A49796	But what was the issue of this Promise in respect of the Israelites?
A49796	But what?
A49796	But who is this High- Priest?
A49796	But why may i ● not be an Hebraism?
A49796	But with whom was He grieved forty years?
A49796	But, how great is our Ignorance of these things?
A49796	By what was this Doctrine confirmed?
A49796	By whom He spake?
A49796	By whom did he speak then unto them?
A49796	By whom they were made?
A49796	By whom was it confirmed?
A49796	Could not God have raised a Priest of that Order far more excellent than Aaron?
A49796	David might well admite and say, Lord, What is man, that thou takest knowledg of him?
A49796	Doth God any thing in vain?
A49796	Doth he desire a Covenant?
A49796	Doth he desire a Mediator of this Covenant?
A49796	Doth he desire an High- Priest?
A49796	Doth he desire his Ministry in Heaven?
A49796	Every exhortation implies the desire of the Oratour, or party exhorting; otherwise, why doth he perswade?
A49796	For it might be said, What Reason, Suasive, Motive, may be given, why we should be so careful to perform this Duty?
A49796	For shall we provoke the Lord to jealousy?
A49796	For to which of the Angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee?
A49796	For what place doth take or affect us more than that of our Birth, Inheritance, Kindred?
A49796	For when we have sinned, what should we do, if we had not him our righteous Advocate and Propitiatour with his Father?
A49796	For who shall lay any thing to the charge of God''s Elect?
A49796	For who, or what can separate us from his love in Christ?
A49796	For, saith he, How then shall the Scriptures be fulfilled, that thus it must be?
A49796	For, to which of the Angels said he?
A49796	For, what need terrify or trouble them, or shake their hearts, when God hath assured them of eternal life?
A49796	Hath Christian Religion no such thing?
A49796	Here it''s expressed Interrogatively; For what Son is there whom the Father chasteneth not?
A49796	How deeply is he engaged and obliged to eternal gratitude and obedience?
A49796	How justly may God charge the Blood of the Souls of our Apostate Brethren upon us?
A49796	How long will my Saviour delay his Coming?
A49796	How much mischief was done to the Church by Simon Magus, Cerinthus, Ebion, Valentius, and other Hereticks?
A49796	How shall we escape?
A49796	How unlike unto Christ are all such, who presume of their own merit, and despise such as Christ hath called?
A49796	How unwilling are they to part with them?
A49796	I see the place of mine eternal Rest afar off, when shall I come near and enter and enjoy my God for ever?
A49796	If God had given this Command, and Christ had never obeyed it; how could it have sanctified us?
A49796	If Men will believe Men swearing; how much more should we believe and rest satisfied in the Oath of God?
A49796	If you endure Chastening, God dealeth with you as with Sons; for, what Son is there whom the Father chasteneth not?
A49796	In the words, four things are to be considered: 1. Who spake?
A49796	Is it singular in this particular?
A49796	It is God that justifirth: Who is he that condemneth?
A49796	It might be said, If they were so poor, imperfect, and ineffectual, why were they observed?
A49796	Let not any slatter themselves, and think to escape: For how shall we escape, if we neglect,& c?
A49796	Not long before his Death, he said, Now my Soul is troubled, and what shall I say?
A49796	Of which it might be said, that it''s a matter not of Joy but Grief, and how then can it proceed from Love, and be any wayes beneficial?
A49796	Seeing it''s not[ expiatorium& redemtorium], as they grant it is not, How should it be the same?
A49796	Shall I never see an end of this Battel, and obtain a final Victory, and so triumph for ever?
A49796	Shall the word of Angels transgressed be so severely punished?
A49796	Shall we come out of Aegypt, and come so near the borders of the heavenly Canaan, and turn back?
A49796	Shall we sin against so great a Majesty, so great a Mercy?
A49796	So that for Christ to be heard, was for Christ to be delivered: But what was he delivered from?
A49796	Some read them Interrogatively, For then should they not have ceased?
A49796	The Answer follows, though proposed, as the former, Interrogatively in these words, But to them that believed not?]
A49796	The Expression seems to be taken from the words of the Prophet, Who are these that fly as a Cloud, and as Doves to their Windows?
A49796	The Question is, But with whom was He grieved forty years?
A49796	The Saints of God sometimes will cry out, Oh when shall these Labours, these Difficulties, these Sufferings of ours have an end?
A49796	The Sin is the neglect of the Gospel: The punishment is implyed in the words How shall we escape?
A49796	The first is, Whether it be necessary and essential to a Priest to have sins of his own, for which he must offer?
A49796	The great doubt is, Whether of these is here intended?
A49796	Therefore sung the Psalmist, Why leap ye, ye high Hills?
A49796	Therefore we must remember both the advice which Christ gives us, when he saith unto us, Take ● ● thought, saying, What shall we ent?
A49796	These Fathers in particular were those who sojourned in Aegypt, 430 years after the Promise was made to Abraham, which informs us?
A49796	These words may seem to give a Reason, why they sought a heavenly Country: And why?
A49796	They did hear it; for how should they hear without a Preacher?
A49796	They give a reason why Christ was lower then the Angels, and suffered Death: And why?
A49796	They were come to God the Judge of all: What is the Body without an Head?
A49796	This is not only obscure, but, if well examined, false: For what is it[ of its own nature to procure?]
A49796	This is the Question, To whom did God thus swear?
A49796	To examine and thoroughly search our hearts, that we may more clearly understand our spiritual condition, Whether it be good or bad?
A49796	To whom He spake?
A49796	To whom did He speak?
A49796	To whom?
A49796	Was not the High Priest a Priest before he entred with the expiatory blood into the holy Place?
A49796	What can Man desire which he shall not have?
A49796	What can he want which God hath not provided for him?
A49796	What more could be done?
A49796	What peace is?
A49796	What?
A49796	When He spake?
A49796	When did God speak to the Children?
A49796	When will he come in the Clouds of Heaven, with all his holy Angels?
A49796	Where are our Bowels of Compassion?
A49796	Where is our Christian Charity?
A49796	Whether our Faith be sincere, and our Profession real or no?
A49796	Whether we tend unto Perdition or Salvation?
A49796	Why by his own blood?
A49796	Wretches?
A49796	Yet both words signify, they had no fixed place of habitation amongst men: But then it might be said, Where did they wander?
A49796	Yet if any ask, When shall we receive the Reward?
A49796	Yet it may be said, What was this to these Hebrews?
A49796	Yet why might he not be called after the Order of Aaron?
A49796	Yet, to what end must they remember all this?
A49796	and how much is his estate advanced by this Relation?
A49796	and how should they hear without a Preacher?
A49796	and how?
A49796	and shall no Offender escape?
A49796	and to leave that place which suddenly must be left?
A49796	and when was he made?
A49796	and who makes it, and where is it made?
A49796	and who were those Israelies, who, by this Oath, were absolutely debarred of all entrance into that Land?
A49796	are ye able to conquer Death, turn Mortality into Eternity, and Earth into Heaven?
A49796	bring upon your selves eternal and unavoidable misery?
A49796	did Christ fear Death?
A49796	how careless are we of this work?
A49796	how languishing our Hopes?
A49796	how long will it be before, our Saviour will come to Reward us?
A49796	how weak our Faith?
A49796	or refuse to go forward?
A49796	or seem foolishness to the Gentiles?
A49796	or stumbling- block unto the Jew?
A49796	or the Son of man, that thou makest account of him?
A49796	or what shall we drink?
A49796	or wherewith shall we be clothed?
A49796	or, What is it to us?
A49796	reject the tender of Salvation?
A49796	was it not with them who had sinned, whose Carkasses fell in the Wilderness?]
A49796	what more could the Heirs of Promise desire?
A49796	why doth he exhort?
A49796	will you despise his sweetest mercy?
A59853	A whole Divinity made up of Three partial and incomplete Divinities?
A59853	And are they not Three who have all the Perfections of the Divine Nature?
A59853	And does not the Scripture, do not all Trinitarians, with the whole Catholick Church, own this?
A59853	And if this had not been the belief of the Catholick Church, what meant their Zeal against this Heresy?
A59853	And must this One Undivided Monad be in Three separate Localities, because it subsists in three distinct Persons?
A59853	And what is the Cons ● quence of this?
A59853	And what is there unintelligible in all this?
A59853	And what is to be done now?
A59853	And when the Arians objected against our Saviour''s saying, I am in the Father, and the Father in me; How can this be in that, and that in this?
A59853	And why may not Number then belong to the Divinity, though it be not quantum, have no Predicamental, that is, Corporeal Quantity?
A59853	And will any Trinitarian deny, That the Father is, the Son is, and the Holy Ghost is?
A59853	And yet I dare appeal to any man of a free and unbiass''d Reason in this Cause, What is that Natural Notion we have of One God?
A59853	Are Spirits united by Juxta- position of Parts, or Penetration of Dimensions?
A59853	Are there then as many peculiar Manners and Modes of Subsistence, as there are, or ever have been, or ever shall be, distinct Persons in the World?
A59853	But after all, Do these Fathers deny, that the Divine Nature is One Individual Nature?
A59853	But at this rate, what Divinity do we leave for the Son, and the Holy Spirit?
A59853	But ca n''t there be more than one of these Eternal, infinitely Wise, infinitely Good, and Omnipotent Natures?
A59853	But do not all Catholick Christians own, That there is but One Infinite, Inseparable, Undivided Nature, in Three Persons?
A59853	But does this make God True and Perfect Man?
A59853	But how can this be, if Person and Essence, Suppositum and Nature be the same, as it is in God?
A59853	But how can we learn God''s Love and Good Will to Mankind, from this Doctrine, if it be not true?
A59853	But how will this agree with the Notion of One Divinity, or One Individual Divine Nature?
A59853	But if God redeems us by a Man, however he be enabled by a Divine Power, Why is he said to give his Son for us?
A59853	But in good earnest, does any sober Christian want an Answer to this Argument?
A59853	But in what sense then can we say, That the Trinity is One God, or that Three Persons are One God?
A59853	But is not this a kind of Sabellian Composition of a God?
A59853	But now will any Catholick Christian say, that thus it is in the Ever Blessed Trinity?
A59853	But still what is all this to the Unity of God?
A59853	But suppose they could not distinguish them, does this prove that God is Incarnate in such men; or would it be a reason to worship such men as God?
A59853	But the Question is, In what sense the Scripture teaches that there is but One God?
A59853	But what becomes then of the Son, and Holy Ghost?
A59853	But what is this Brightness, and what is this Glory?
A59853	But what is this common Nature, which is seen by Reason?
A59853	But what possible Sense can we make of this?
A59853	But what room then does this leave for a Real Trinity of Persons, in this One, Simple, Uncompounded, Indivisible, Inseparable Nature?
A59853	But who ever thought of causes of Distinction and Unity in an Eternal Nature, which has no cause?
A59853	But, What it is that makes it One; or what the formal Conception of its Unity is?
A59853	Can Eternal Truth, and Infinite Wisdom in any thing vary from it self, to make two Eternal Truths, and Infinite Wisdoms?
A59853	Can any thing else give us so true and perfect a Character and Idea of each of them, as this does?
A59853	Can the Specifick Notional Unity of Human Nature, make three men one man, as the One common Divine Nature makes Three Persons One God?
A59853	Displicet cuiquam in Synodo Nicaena homousion esse susceptum?
A59853	Do not all the Christian Creeds teach us to profess our Faith in One God the Father, from whom the Son and the Holy Spirit receive their Godhead?
A59853	Do they mean, that there is but one Numerical Subsisting Nature common to all the Individuals?
A59853	Does the Father Will any thing?
A59853	Ergo inquis, das aliquam substantiam esse sermonem?
A59853	For what do these Fathers mean by a common Nature?
A59853	For what man knoweth the things of a man, but the spirit of man, which is in him?
A59853	For will we say, That the Trinity, or Three Persons, are but One Person?
A59853	Has God any Place; does he subsist in any thing but himself?
A59853	He must then partake of the Father: But what is that, and whence is it?
A59853	Here then we join issue with them, and desire them to shew us, what is impossible or contradictious in this Faith?
A59853	How there can be Three Incommunicable Persons, and Suppositums, and but One Nature, and that communicable to more than One?
A59853	Iam nunc quaeritur, quis quomodo utatur aliqua re& vocabulo ejus?
A59853	If I am asked not only Who but What the Three in the Ever- blessed Trinity are?
A59853	If the Unity of the Divine Nature be but a Notion, the Unity of God, the Unity of the Trinity, which is this One God, must be a meer Notion also?
A59853	If you inquire, what Spirit, and what Matter is?
A59853	In qua ● ffigie Dei?
A59853	Is it any thing more, than that there is and can be but One Eternal Self- originated Being, who is the Principle or Cause of all other Beings?
A59853	Is it because none is, or can be God, True and Perfect God, but he, who is God of himself, Self- originated and Unbegotten?
A59853	Is it such a direct Contradiction to Sense and Reason, to say, That there is alius,& alius,& alius, in the Trinity, but not aliud?
A59853	Is it the Son of God, that Eternal Word, which was in the beginning, was with God, and was God?
A59853	Is not the Son God?
A59853	Is not the Unity of God the fundamental Article of Natural Religion?
A59853	Is there any thing else which is common to them, but the Name and Nature of God?
A59853	Is this Extraordinary Power a Divine Subsisting Person, in the true and proper Notion of a Person?
A59853	Is this Extraordinary Power so united to Human Nature, as to become Man?
A59853	Let me then ask this plain Question: When Five hundred Men hear the same Man speak, do they all hear one and the same Voice, or Five hundred Voices?
A59853	Let our Socinian Adversaries tell us, what there is absurd, impossible, or contradictious in this Faith?
A59853	Non haben ● o autem filium cum ipse sum flius, quem ● do pater ero?
A59853	Now if this be true, what Apology can be made for them?
A59853	Now what is the meaning of this?
A59853	Now will any man say, That the One Divinity, or One Divine Nature, and One God, is a meer Notion?
A59853	Now, says he, in what Image of God, was he?
A59853	Or how can the Father, who is greater, be at all in the Son, who is less?
A59853	Or how much we must believe of them?
A59853	Or what wonder is it, that the Son should be in the Father, when it is written of us all, That in him we live, and move, and have our being?
A59853	Prolatus est Sermo Dei an non?
A59853	Quid agis Lot sancte?
A59853	Quid est enim Filius de eo quod Pater est?
A59853	So far he is in the right; but what is this different way?
A59853	That a Perfect, Living, Subsisting Image, should not be perfectly the same with its Prototype, from whom it receives its Being and Nature?
A59853	That the One Common Divinity is One and Common, only as One Common Humanity is, that is, that it is perfectly the same in all?
A59853	The Question then is, Whether we must not believe the Doctrines of the Trinity and Incarnation?
A59853	The short Question is this; Whether a True, Proper, Divine Person was Incarnate, in the Incarnation of Christ?
A59853	Then, says he, he must be the Son of God by participation; what is it then he partakes of?
A59853	These are two very different Questions, and of a very different consideration, What God is?
A59853	This sounds well; but why does he not speak out, and tell us what this Form of God is?
A59853	Three in One Substance, and thrice Once Substance?
A59853	Thus what is the Unity of Energy and Operation, but the same Conscious Will and Power acting distinctly, but inseparably in Three?
A59853	Vacua& inanis res est sermo De ●, qui filius dictus est, qui ipse Deus cogneminatus est?
A59853	Was he a Human Person; or the Person of the Son of God appearing in Human Nature?
A59853	Well, But is not the Father then, in his own Person, True and Perfect God, and the Son True and Perfect God, and the Holy Ghost True and Perfect God?
A59853	Well, but what is this Essence of a Mind, and this Unity of Essence, which makes a Mind One?
A59853	Well: What is necessary to be believed concerning the Trinity?
A59853	Well; but are there not Individual Men then, as well as a Common Nature?
A59853	What difference between Three Substances, and tria supposita?
A59853	What is it then that subsists by it self?
A59853	What then was Christ''s Human Nature?
A59853	What then was wanting to make us Human Nature a Human Person?
A59853	When we profess to believe that there are Three in the Unity of the Godhead the next question is, What Three they are?
A59853	Whether the True Divine Nature subsisting in him, a True Divine Person?
A59853	Will they venture to say, That it is absurd or contradictious, that God should have a Son?
A59853	Would not Human Nature be as perfectly the same in Three Persons or Subsistences, as the Idea of Human Nature is one and the same in Three Minds?
A59853	Would they have taught, That the Divinity may be numbred, and yet is without Number?
A59853	and Who this God is?
A59853	and how then is this One Individual Nature?
A59853	and the Spirit God?
A59853	but one Universal Human Nature in all the particular men in the World?
A59853	but, Whether the Son and Holy Ghost were truly and really distinct Persons from the Father, as the Catholick Church always believed?
A59853	if God have no Eternal Son, and therefore did not give his Eternal Son to become Man, and to suffer and dye for us?
A59853	or, How many partial Conceptions are united in One Idea?
A59853	that is, Have not each of these Divine Persons all the Divine Perfections included in the Notion and Idea of God?
A59853	thought I; How is this applicable to the Unity of God?
A59853	ut inanis solida,& vacuus plena,& incorporalis corporalia operatus sit?
A59853	whether he be Consubstantial with the Father, or have only a Nature like the Fathers, but not the same?
A59853	whether he be true perfect God, in opposition to the most perfect created Nature, or be only a made and Creature- God?
A59853	whether there were any time, the least conceivable moment before the Son was?
A59809	( How comes this guilt to be finite now?
A59809	Agreeably to St. Chrysostoms account of the words, as they are translated also by our Author, What is that Loaf?
A59809	And a little before: Are we then freed from this Obedience?
A59809	And can the grace of God be resisted?
A59809	And how is it possible, they should get the Robes of Christs Righteousness, till they are married to him?
A59809	And is not Pardon as properly opposed to Condemnation, as Absolution is?
A59809	And is not that then the original signification of the Name?
A59809	And may he not then require the intervention of a Sacrifice, and of a very meritorious one too, to purchase and seal his Pardon to Sincers?
A59809	And that those glorious Discoveries, which God hath made of these Perfections in Christ, are but a metaphorical Brightness of this Glory?
A59809	And what our Church attributes to this Faith in the Work of Justification?
A59809	And where is the Sanction of it?
A59809	And who gave it this Sanction?
A59809	And will he save and reward those who do obey for their obedience?
A59809	As for instance, he charges my Notion of Union to Christ with disserving holiness; Why, what is my Notion of Union?
A59809	But Baptism makes us complete members of the Church only under the notion of Catholick visible; How comes this to pass now?
A59809	But I would fain know what he means by neglecting or despising the Grace of God, is it to resist the grace of God, and to make it ineffectual?
A59809	But does he indeed speak as he means?
A59809	But does not this Imputation make it ours?
A59809	But how does this follow?
A59809	But how is it said then, Srait is the gate, and narrow is the way that leadeth unto life?
A59809	But pray whom or what do I scorn?
A59809	But pray why do they think so?
A59809	But pray why so?
A59809	But pray, who taught him to oppose the Light of Nature to the Gospel of Christ?
A59809	But suppose that we are so charitable as to hope that God may receive them, yet how does this make them members of the Catholick visible Church?
A59809	But the Doctor proceeds, But may we not, notwithstanding this Command, be justified and saved without this Holiness?
A59809	But was not Christ personally righteous with this Righteousness?
A59809	But what is this Socinian Notion of Justification?
A59809	But what will Mr. Ferguson say, if Mr. Calvin gives the very same account of the words, which I do?
A59809	But who told Mr. Ferguson that Christ is not the immediate Political Head of his Church, and that therefore there must be a Vicarious Head?
A59809	But why so much haste of declaring?
A59809	But why so pray?
A59809	Can it be inherent in him, and he not righteous by it?
A59809	Can it fail of its Effect?
A59809	Could he with any Confidence then cry out of Persecution, when he himself hath sounded the Alarm to it?
A59809	Did I ever affirm, that the Death of Christ did only ratifie and confirm the Covenant?
A59809	Did he not frequently interpose between God and the People, and by his intercessions divert his anger from them?
A59809	Did he so fulfil Righteousness for us, that he himself had no interest in it?
A59809	Do I make any spiteful Reflections upon mens Persons?
A59809	Do I not every where assert that Christs Death did procure and purchase, as well as seal the Covenant of Grace?
A59809	Do I tell merry Tales of them?
A59809	Do I transprose them, or dress them up in a fools Coat to be laught at?
A59809	Do they believe the Church of England to be infallible?
A59809	Do they think it a sufficient proof of the Truth of any Doctrine, that it is the Doctrine of the Church of England?
A59809	Does it not as much belong to a supreme and unaccountable Judge to pardon, as to absolve?
A59809	Doth this Election and Redemption suppose holiness in us?
A59809	First, What is meant by Faith in the Merits of Christ?
A59809	For did I ever assert, that an External Union to the visible Church did complete and perfect our Union to Christ?
A59809	For what reason then shall we serve God?
A59809	Hast thou been a Blasphemer?
A59809	Hast thou been a Murderer, an Adulterer, a Thief, a Liar, a Drunkard?
A59809	Have you a mind to teach People such Antichristian Pride, as to go about to make themselves fit for Christ, before they will close with him?
A59809	He did lay sins on him; When did he lay them?
A59809	How come they to be translated again from Christ, and laid upon this Person?
A59809	How does he prove this?
A59809	How then are they obnoxious to the Curse of the Law?
A59809	How then can we answer the demands of the Law with it?
A59809	If there be sinfulness in them, where then is their Peace?
A59809	If they attribute so much to the Judgment and Authority of our Church, is it not as good in one case, as it is in another?
A59809	In what sense then does our Church reject good Works, and attribute our Justification to Faith alone?
A59809	Is any thing the less ours, because it is not originally ours, but so by Gift?
A59809	Is it that we should kill them, stifle the Creature, that is formed in us in the Womb?
A59809	Is not the Promise of Pardon purchas''d and sealed with the Blood of Christ, absolutely necessary to encourage men to be good?
A59809	Is there no difference between Works which are imperfectly good, and Works which have no goodness in them?
A59809	Is there no difference then between an imputed, and an inherent and personal Righteousness?
A59809	Is this a needless enquiry?
A59809	Is this the way to cure the world of Atheism?
A59809	May it not confer a right, and lay an obligation to Communion with a particular Church, when we come where it is?
A59809	May we not imitate that which we can not equal?
A59809	Methinks he should consider, whose property it is so much to wonder: But what is the reason of this wonder?
A59809	Mr. Shephard begins thus, In what hast thou gone beyond them that think they are rich, and want nothing, who yet are poor, and miserable, and naked?
A59809	Must the Conscience be set free in matters of External Order and Government, but tied up in Doctrines and Opinions?
A59809	Must we make our selves beautiful before we are married to Christ, or receive all our beauty from him?
A59809	Must we reform our Lives, and lay aside our Opposition to God, and return to our Duty and Allegeance?
A59809	Nay, is not this an Argument that Baptism admits them into the Church, because such persons only are subject to the Censures of it?
A59809	Nay, the brightness of the Glory of God, and the Image of an infinite Spirit, which hath no shape?
A59809	No, that he rejected before; What then?
A59809	Or is it without any regard to it?
A59809	Or must they be false, or wholly rejected, because they are not a true Medium of knowledge in that sense, wherein the Gospel of Christ is?
A59809	Or should they teach men to trust wholly in the righteousness of Christ, without any righteousness of their own?
A59809	Or that it is Fruitful, or Effective of good things unto the Persons Beloved?
A59809	Or that it is Unchangeable?
A59809	Or what occasion had I to oppose it in this place?
A59809	Say you so Sir?
A59809	Should they cry down holiness, and preach up debauchery?
A59809	That he, who owns the Gospel of Christ as the only true Medium of knowledge, must be supposed to reject the Light of Nature?
A59809	That the Apostle rejects all Works, though they are separated from the notion of Merit?
A59809	That they do not differ in their Natures, Acts, and Effects?
A59809	That we should give him to the old man to be devoured?
A59809	That whatever he did as a man, he did as a Mediator?
A59809	The Righteousness of Christ imputed to us makes us righteous as Christ is, and what need is there then of any Righteousness of our own?
A59809	There St. Paul enquires by what means our Father Abraham was justified before God?
A59809	These are broken Cisterns, and what Peace is there in them?
A59809	Thus Christ is called Life, and can any one be an active Creature before there be life breathed into him?
A59809	To prove the oneness and identity, which intervenes between Christ, and single Believers?
A59809	To what end hath God given us new hearts, and new natures?
A59809	To which the Doctor answers, That we are not so to die for any one, as Christ died for us: But what of that?
A59809	We are thereby made the righteousness of God in him; if we be righteousness, where is our sinfulness to be charged upon us?
A59809	Well, Is there an Essential Unity then here meant betwixt Christ and Believers?
A59809	Were there any men who taught the People that Holiness would save them without the Merits of Christ?
A59809	What account will he now give of Renouncing the Communion of this Church?
A59809	What are those who partake of it?
A59809	What has he to object against this?
A59809	What is our finite guilt before it?
A59809	What subtilty is required in Children to understand these deep Points, and to comprehend the subtil and artificial Schemes of Orthodoxy?
A59809	What?
A59809	Where is this Law?
A59809	Whether Good Works may be said to be necessary to Justification or Salvation?
A59809	Who can say I have washed my hands?
A59809	Why could not he by all, understand all men of any knowledge and skill in the use of words, which some, and a great many, have not?
A59809	Why do they renounce Communion with us?
A59809	Why does he not correct the whole Gospel, the language of which is, He that continueth to the end shall be saved?
A59809	Why does not our Author correct our Saviour, for telling those new Converts, If ye continue in my words, then shall ye be my Disciples indeed?
A59809	Why then I have contradicted the Doctrine to which I have subscribed; if I have done so, it is very ill done of me, but what then?
A59809	Why then do they reject any of the Articles of our Church?
A59809	Why then this is a sufficient Answer to my Book: But I pray why so?
A59809	Why then, to place Justification in pardon of sin, is to make it not a proper but metaphorical Justification; and what then?
A59809	Will nothing satisfie the Law but perfect and unsinning Obedience?
A59809	Will the Father Elect, and the Son Redeem none but those who are holy, and reject and reprobate all others?
A59809	Would not our Author then change his Note, and repent of such Intimations as these?
A59809	Yes, for this is not a Gospel- Holiness, which is wholly owing to the Divine Grace: But does the efficient cause then constitute the nature of things?
A59809	Yes; But how far?
A59809	or that the Goodness of God confers an antecedent title on Sinners to Grace and Pardon?
A59809	will he damn those, who do not obey, for their disobedience?
A62735	?
A62735	Adam why Created out of Paradise, and after brought in?
A62735	Alioqui quid erat opus, soris videre carnem,& carnis audire sermones, si intus ● Spriritu su rint instructi perfectè de omnibus?
A62735	And had not Abraham reason to be glad?
A62735	And had not Christ suffered, and so entred into Glory, how could he have obtained the Kingdom promised of his Father?
A62735	And if Socinus doth not ground his own Hypothesis upon Scripture, wherefore doth he call for Scripture, Scripture?
A62735	And if so, why did he now?
A62735	And if you ask me, what could they do?
A62735	And less reason to be given why or how it should be first devised?
A62735	And was not Abraham taught as much as this,( do you think?)
A62735	And was not this the Question put to Iohn the Baptist, Art thou that Prophet, or do we expect another?
A62735	And was that possible without hope?
A62735	And what hath he deserved of the truth, that we( that revere the Scripture indeed) should defer so much authority to him?
A62735	And when he was come, who should be enquired of but the Pharisees whether he was indeed the Christ, or no?
A62735	And whereas she had this heavy sentence from the Lord?
A62735	And who was ever set up for an Idol, but the worst of men?
A62735	And why must the Law be needs ordained in the hand of such an one?
A62735	And, said not God unto Iacob, Go up to Bethel, and dwell there, and make there an Altar unto God?
A62735	Annon fatis est, D ● ● n c ● n ● la regere perpetu ●, ac g ● b ● ● nare, n ● ● ● pso plan ● nelente quidquam fieri posse?
A62735	BUT here the Objectors may close again, and say, Is there( then) no priviledge or no advantage by the Gospel?
A62735	But against this that passage seems to make, that when God demanded of Cain, Where is Abel thy Brother?
A62735	But from which of the first reasons( however over- ruled) should it proceed?
A62735	But how a Bridle?
A62735	But how should these know the difference of their acceptations?
A62735	But if ten Tribes give eleven hundred thousand, what shall two Tribes give at the same proportion?
A62735	But if the Masters were indifferently such( as I have described) what think you were the Men?
A62735	But if they did this to acknowledge the right of the Lord of life and death only, why did they take his right from him?
A62735	But let us hear what they say now to this instance of Cain and Abel?
A62735	But now She puts Hagar to him, as if it were on purpose to restrain his choice of any other: What shall He do?
A62735	But what have we to say at last, that all the Sons of Iacob( his Concubines and all) should be taken in, and never an one rejected?
A62735	But what saith the Scripture?
A62735	But what shall they dig, or cut withal?
A62735	But what should they do at last?
A62735	But what though?
A62735	But whither must he go?
A62735	But why Ashes?
A62735	But why?
A62735	But, first, What kind of arguing is this?
A62735	Certainly, to rise: but if so, must it not be by a right repentance?
A62735	Could he have any private Altar?
A62735	Could the Son of man then( any more than at his second Coming) find faith upon the Earth?
A62735	Could they bring enough?
A62735	Cui ● nim usui, obsecro, is ● a praenotio esset?
A62735	Did ever Ishmael or Esau play such pranks as some of these?
A62735	Did he think it unlawful to take a Concubine?
A62735	Dix illud inter homines eruditissimos disceptalum est, quid de summo salutis auspice speraverit olim, credidertive antiquior illa Hebraeorum Natio?
A62735	Do we not all believe the Gospel, not knowing how much may be contained in it?
A62735	Do we not engage ourselves in Baptism to obey, not knowing what shall be required of us?
A62735	Do we not see that he alledgeth Scripture only to baulk us, and admitteth it not to inform himself?
A62735	Does not many a Murtherer escape by flying amongst men, and hiding himself in the Crowd?
A62735	Doth God abhor incest and adultery, and yet suffer the choicest Blessings of all to descend to their Issue?
A62735	For can not God be known but by faith?
A62735	For if Abel sacrificed in obedience to some Law of God, what shall we judge of Cain?
A62735	For if had been otherwise, what should David have done, when he was convicted by the Prophet of his two great sins, of murder and adultery?
A62735	For may not they say, Why do not you hold the Lords Day to be jure Divino?
A62735	For must such a mixture be?
A62735	For the first of these, Quis unquam negavit?
A62735	For what is there in water now, more than in fire before?
A62735	For what say others of his Followers?
A62735	For who ever thought, that a thing not repugnant must needs be, or be most likely, at the least?
A62735	For who should they give them to besides?
A62735	For who will dare to disobey the nod of a Prince( if he may understand it right) without the pain of displeasure, or other penalties?
A62735	For why?
A62735	From Adam''s?
A62735	God caused the Covenant of Works to be shut in a Chest under the Mercy- seat, and why?
A62735	Has S t Paul magnified his own ministry, and this ministration all in vain?
A62735	Having therefore no Lands, what should they do with Seed?
A62735	He replyed, I know not: Am I my Brothers Keeper?
A62735	He was a Reprobate; From Abel, Noah and Abraham, according to such respective enlightnings as they had?
A62735	How a Seal, and of what Covenant?
A62735	How many instances might be given to expose such a supposition to laughter?
A62735	How the difference stood or appeared in respect of what they offered, and how they were accepted?
A62735	How then?
A62735	How was he concerned in it?
A62735	If it be asked again, Why was Sem chosen rather than Ham and Iaphet?
A62735	If it be asked, Why Abel was accepted, and Cain not?
A62735	If it be further questioned, What private Religion Ioseph could have unto himself, or what exercise or practice of it, in the house of Pharaoh?
A62735	If it had been righteous Abel, the younger Brother, whom Cain hated, would not Cain have disdained to take example from him?
A62735	If it had been wicked Cain, would God have spoken so indifferently to him?
A62735	If there be a particular Election of persons, conditionally only; then, Whether Election hangeth in suspense?
A62735	If they had known him generally, durst the rest of them have crucified the Lord of life and glory?
A62735	If they were not according to the Spirit of Christ, how could we be sanctified or comforted by the Scriptures of the Old Testament?
A62735	If thou do well, shalt thou not be accepted?
A62735	If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted?
A62735	If to any Priesthood, after the disappearing of Melchisedeck, where was the like o ● der?
A62735	If you ask, Why, where should he have had another?
A62735	In all which, if there were not a Syllable of Christ, how could we use the fame Forms and Phrases still?
A62735	Is He glad of the occasion for the further satisfying of his flesh?
A62735	Is it more reasonable that men should prescribe a modus of his own worship unto God, or he to men?
A62735	Is it not for the same reason that we hold Infant- Baptism to be nothing so?
A62735	Is not this argumentum ad hominem, if after this he affirm( as his Followers do) that Sacrifices were of humane excogitation only?
A62735	Is not this to appeal always to himself?
A62735	Let us go over unto the Garison of these uncircumcised Philistins, said Ionathan: Who is this uncircumcised Philistine?
A62735	Must not he, as well as his Grandfather Abraham, leave it all behind him, at the next remove?
A62735	Now although it be said, that the Canaanite and the Perizzite dwelled then in the Land; yet Abram said unto Lot, Is not the whole Land before thee?
A62735	Now if any one ask here, Why, what choice had he or the other Brothers?
A62735	Or did he spare all his Flock to be immortal, while Man alone was subject to mortality?
A62735	Or do you think it proper that God himself should second a project of the wicked Cain, or the decayed Adam?
A62735	Or doth he do it the better to please his Wife, even as Adam pleased Eve, and fell by it?
A62735	Or how is it that David and Christ should come to descend from this Pharez, rather than from Shelah?
A62735	Or how the Egyptians could bear their Sacrifices better than their Trade or Diet?
A62735	Or how was Abel''s Sacrifice of more value than Cain''s?
A62735	Or indeed, a thousand Head of Sheep or Cattel of any great worth, if their Flesh were not?
A62735	Or of the Bread and Wine that was used at the Passover, to frame his own Supper by it, according to their use?
A62735	Or should they rather strive and endeavour to rise again?
A62735	Or such a Seed proceed from the Bowels of a Canaanitish Woman, as shall be proper to destroy the Canaanites?
A62735	Or such a faith without a clear evidence to support it?
A62735	Or such an hope, without a ground of faith?
A62735	Or what might they have to divide amongst them when they came home?
A62735	Or what need had Abel to bring such Sacrifices as these but once a year, the profits whereof arose daily?
A62735	Or who can shew the institution before the practice?
A62735	Or who ever blamed Abraham for his taking of Hagar or Keturah for his Concubines?
A62735	Or who ever questioned but that those were saved by some faith or other equivalent unto ours?
A62735	Or, That men were never at all justified by their Offering of Sacrifice in Faith?
A62735	Or, could he have any Closets adorned with the Reliques of Noah, Sem, Eber, Abraham,& c or any other holy things?
A62735	Or, if he had, any one to serve at that Altar, or to worship at it, besides himself?
A62735	Or, in sine, is not he himself also touched with a little spice of unbelief, in his obtemperance unto Sarai, as well as she?
A62735	Our first Parents Created in perfection, yet never offered to couple in their innocency, though they had such a command, with a blessing; and why?
A62735	Quare voláerunt videre,& audire?
A62735	Said not God unto Iacob at his first descent, I will go down with thee into Egypt, and I will also surely bring thee up again?
A62735	Secondly, But why( then) did he send his ten Sons only, with their ten Asses, to buy Corn for them all?
A62735	Secondly, Why the Sons of Keturah afterwards?
A62735	Should they rest in despair, and in dejection?
A62735	Should we think it to be too hard for him, or that he had not time enough in the nine hundred and thirty years, that he lived, to accomplish it?
A62735	That they import no more but that men should hate Serpents, and Serpents men; and that they should lye in wait for one another?
A62735	The Prophet said, I beseech thee, O Lord, for the Lord''s sake; The Question is, For what Lord''s sake?
A62735	Thirdly, Why the Servants born in the house, or bought with money, who were all Aliens from the Seed of Abraham?
A62735	To this was added the great favour of Almighty God( for when did he ever do so by any other mortal man?)
A62735	Under some of which Heads it will fall in to be considered how Circumcision was a Sign, and of what?
A62735	Was Circumcision ancienter than He?
A62735	Was not Abraham expresly commanded to offer up his Son Isaac, and did not God provide him of a Ram in the stead of his Son?
A62735	Was not therefore the Regiment of the Church of the Old Testament under God the Father?
A62735	Was that the proper way to acknowledge it?
A62735	What made Abram so continent hitherto, and so constant to his barren Wife Sarai?
A62735	What private Religion he might have; What godly people near him?
A62735	What think you of Murder before Noah?
A62735	What was his speech to Ionah?
A62735	Wherefore then serveth the Law?
A62735	Whether Cain and Abel offered apart, or in one place?
A62735	Which of the contradictions of these rational Querists shall we embrace, since they can not all hold together, nor yet agree one with another?
A62735	Whither should they go?
A62735	Who was this Mediator then?
A62735	Who will venture to keep his place, if a General point with his Staff or Finger, directing any motion?
A62735	Whom did the other Brothers marry?
A62735	Why, also, they coveted Children after their fall?
A62735	Why, wherein was the difference?
A62735	Will I eat the flesh of Bulls, or drink the blood of Goats?
A62735	Will they therefore wholely deny any institution, by way of implicit precept?
A62735	Will ye hear it from his own mouth?
A62735	[ Was it given to the prejudice of the Grace of Christ?]
A62735	and whether it might be imposed?
A62735	and why is thy countonance fallen?
A62735	of burning for Adultery afterwards?
A62735	or by the explicit faith of Christ, exhibited in the New Testament, more than there was before?
A62735	or in Bread and Wine now, more than in the Cakes and Libaments, with the flesh and bloud of Sheep, before?
A62735	or raise example in some one case, or two, as high as a precept; and in many more, of great importance, study to dwindle it to nothing?
A62735	or what congruity in the sense?
A62735	or what did he do?
A62735	to a place he knew not?
A62735	to men that know not him?
A62735	when God commanded him to offer up his only Son Isaac, and in sparing Isaac, provided Abraham of another Sacrifice?
A62735	— — Quis nescit qualia demens Aegyptus portentae colit?
A62735	● If to Sacrifices, what should he add?
A60941	1688?
A60941	9. representing Him to their thoughts, as an Old Man sitting in Heaven?
A60941	A Rational, a Sensitive, and a Vegetative?
A60941	Again, is Pardon of Sin an Essential Act of God''s Iustice?
A60941	Agreeably to all which, Seneca in the Preface to his Natural Questions, putting the Question, Quid est Deus?
A60941	And I would fain know, Whether this Man of Paradox, will affirm, That God Loves every Thing which he has a true Knowledge and Estimation of?
A60941	And St. Ierom in his Epistle to Damasus, Quis ore sacrilego Tres substantias praedicabit?
A60941	And after this tell us, That this gives no Account at all, how Three distinct Persons come to have but one Will and Energy, Power and Operation?
A60941	And are not these passages an Account of his Dealings and Operations in the Government of the World?
A60941	And besides, if a Mind, or Spirit, were not a Substance, what could it be else?
A60941	And can so Learned, and every way Excellent a Clergy bear this?
A60941	And does not this look mightily agreeable to all the Principles of Reason and Divinity?
A60941	And here if it should be asked, How they differ, and whether it be by any real distinction between the Persons?
A60941	And how can a Spirit incur directly into that?
A60941	And how does he acquit himself as to this?
A60941	And how does he prove this 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 to be Mutual Consciousness?
A60941	And if True, whether one Truth can any more obscure, perplex, and confound, than it can contradict another Truth?
A60941	And if so, must we not needs find a great difficulty in knowing it?
A60941	And if they derived this Perfection from their Souls, must not their Souls have been eminently perfect themselves, which rendred them so?
A60941	And in the next, assert also, that this Unity of Nature is proved by Unity of Energy and Operation?
A60941	And is not this close and profound reasoning?
A60941	And now can this Man pretend to speak these Things in the Person of one who thus Abhors, Abominates, and Detests them?
A60941	And now, is not this( think we) a most proper and fit posture for such as view and look into things very plain, obvious, and intelligible?
A60941	And now, what Relation does or can such an Act of Self- Consciousness imply in it?
A60941	And now, what does all this prove?
A60941	And that therefore the Laws will be very severe upon such as invade his Property?
A60941	And that we can have no Notion of Substance, but what implies in it something gross and material?
A60941	And then lastly for the School- men, who could have expected fewer of them also, than Ten, or Twenty?
A60941	And then, Where could be the Freedom of this Grace?
A60941	And to throw his Scurrility at High, and Low, at all About him, Above him, and Below him( if there be any such) at this insufferable rate?
A60941	And what of all this, I pray?
A60941	And what sence can there be in affirming, or saying, That they are but one distinct Infinite Mind?
A60941	And who denies this?
A60941	And will this bold over bearing Man, after all this, Claim their meaning to be the same with his?
A60941	And, What is the distinction between Essence, and Personality, and Subsistence?
A60941	And, are they so?
A60941	And, since Things were so in former Days, what hinders, but that in these latter Days likewise, the same, if not prevented, may happen again?
A60941	And, what is yet more, does it not more properly belong to any other of the Divine Acts, than to an Act of Knowledge?
A60941	Any more than he who says, That the Father is God, and the Son God, affirms them to be Two distinct Gods?
A60941	Are we able to comprehend them perfectly, and to the utmost of what, and how they are?
A60941	As, First, Whether the Soul, or Mind of Man be one Person, and the Man himself Another?
A60941	Basil, Theodoret, Epiphanius, with several more, all alledged in his behalf?
A60941	Between That, without which a Thing can not be, and that, which that Thing properly is?
A60941	But I demand of him, does Athanasius here speak of them as of Three Persons, or no?
A60941	But also, and much more properly to the Question, that enquires, What kind of Nature, or Essence such a thing is of?
A60941	But did his Adversary, Dr. Owen, ever speak so?
A60941	But does this inferr, That He is therefore a distinct Intelligent Mind, or Being from the Father?
A60941	But how then comes there to be only Three?
A60941	But may not others therefore, who are wiser, conceive more worthily of him, without laying aside that Scripture- expression?
A60941	But now if any one should ask me, What this Generation and Filiation, this Spiration and Procession are?
A60941	But perhaps it will be here said, if these Modes are not so many meer Nothings, or Entia Rationis, what order, or rank shall they be placed in?
A60941	But suppose, these unlucky Wits had used some new Terms, have they taught any new Faith about the Trinity in Unity, which the Church did not teach?
A60941	But then, I ask him, are not the Divine Operations so too?
A60941	But what is this to Spiritual Substances?
A60941	But what is this to our Author''s Purpose?
A60941	But what must we call them then?
A60941	But what shall we say to the Charge of Heresie,( in which St. Austin would have no Person, who is so charged to be silent?)
A60941	But where then may we find it?
A60941	But why do I speak of reconciling Contradictions?
A60941	But why do I speak of the Greek and Latine Fathers?
A60941	But why must the School- men bear all the blame of this?
A60941	But will this Man conclude, That where there is no Absurdity, there is therefore no Difficulty neither?
A60941	But you will say, From whom?
A60941	But you will say: Does not this infer Four Persons in the Godhead?
A60941	But, why, I pray?
A60941	Could you not as well have said, Let us change Saddles?
A60941	Do all, or any of the fore- mentioned Terms signifie Mutual Consciousness?
A60941	Do these Words speak of these Persons as distinguished, or do they not?
A60941	Does he,( I would fain know) in this speak his Judgment, or his Breeding?
A60941	For What Reason can be given of this?
A60941	For does he, or can he think to Live and Converse in the World upon these Terms?
A60941	For does not Unity of Nature, in these three distinct Persons prove this?
A60941	For has he lost his daring Polemick Pen?
A60941	For if we describe his Nature by any particular Attribute, or Perfection, and be thereupon asked, What that is?
A60941	For is it good arguing to conclude, That because a thing is actually thus or thus, it can not possibly be otherwise?
A60941	For must it be Nonsence not to own Contradictions?
A60941	For otherwise how come so many Socinian Pieces wrote against him to lie so long unanswered?
A60941	For the Nature and Condition of the Thing will not have it so, nor have the Ablest Divines ever thought it so,( for where then were the Mystery?)
A60941	For this is an Answer, not only to that Question, that enquires, Whether there be such a thing, or Essence, or no?
A60941	For will any one say, That the Soul can either Create or Generate the Person, or( to speak more plainly) the Man who is the Person?
A60941	For will he say, That the School- men do not grant such Modes to be in God, after he himself has done his poor utmost to confute them for holding it?
A60941	For will he, in the first place, assert, in the Three Divine Persons a Numerical Unity of Nature?
A60941	For will this Author put out the Eyes of his Reader?
A60941	For, Why not a Substance without Beginning, as well as Truth, or Wisdom, or Goodness, without a Beginning?
A60941	From Servetus, or Socinus,( from whom also it was borrowed) than from a Son of the Church, in a Book published by Licence and Authority?
A60941	How can Three distinct Persons have but One Numerical Substance?
A60941	How can three distinct Persons have but one Numerical Substance?
A60941	I Answer, What if we can not?
A60941	I tell him, This is not the Point in Controversie, Whether we can imagine it, or no?
A60941	If it be here now asked: Whether Subsistence, or Suppositality added to bare Nature, does not make a Composition?
A60941	In the mean time, why should any one who had reàd but a Page in Calvin, quote him for such a word as could not possibly drop from so Learned a Pen?
A60941	In what the Father''s placed the Unity in Trinity?
A60941	In which case, who must be the Person drawing them?
A60941	Indeed no more than that Reply of Hazael, Is thy Servant a Dog?
A60941	Is a Beast an Intelligent Substance?
A60941	Is it because this Author has got the Monopoly of them, and engrossed them all to himself?
A60941	Is there so much as one Tittle in the Fathers expressing, or necessarily implying, that it is so?
A60941	Is this( says he) Language becoming a Son of the Church of England?
A60941	It is so far from being a wonder to meet with any Thing[ whose Nature] we do not understand,& c. But is this Sence, or Grammar?
A60941	Master, What needs all these Words?
A60941	Must nothing be applyed to God, but what shall let us into the full knowledge of all that is difficult and mysterious in the Divine Nature?
A60941	Must we all take up in Scepticism, and acknowledge, that nothing is to be known?
A60941	Nay, Where could be this Grace it self?
A60941	Nay, on the contrary, does it not Exert it self in Infinite other Acts?
A60941	Now all this is very true; but how will our Author bring it to his purpose?
A60941	Now how shall we reconcile these blind Assertions, that so cruelly bu ● t and run their Heads against one another?
A60941	Or an Act of Sight such a Circulation?
A60941	Or can we think that the Fathers wrote Things without Words, as some do but too often write Words without Things?
A60941	Or charge them as the necessary Consequences of his Doctrine, without proving, or by any formed Argument so much as offering to prove them so?
A60941	Or did that Act consist in a Wise proportion of Rewards and Punishments, before there was any Act of the Creature to be Rewarded, or Punished?
A60941	Or does any Man say, Reach me that Book,[ who lies there] or that Chair[ who stands there?]
A60941	Or does he never reflect upon himself, nor consider, That though he does not, others assuredly will?
A60941	Or does the Son''s Relation to the Father consist in his being Conscious to himself of this Relation?
A60941	Or has he lost the use of his Hand?
A60941	Or has he run himself out of Breath?
A60941	Or must it be Heresie not to Subscribe to Tritheisme, as the best and most Orthodox Explication of the Article of the Trinity?
A60941	Or that this 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 in the whole Latitude and Compass of it extends no further?
A60941	Or the Language, they wrote in, too scanty to express their Speculations by?
A60941	Or use the Expressions here uttered by this Author?
A60941	Or what does it conclude for him?
A60941	Or will he say, That our Saviour meant the same Thing with himself, but was not so happy in expressing it?
A60941	Or, can a Beast be a Person, and yet not an Intelligent Substance, when he affirms, That they are Terms Reciprocal?
A60941	Or, that Self- Consciousness is the proper ground, or Reason of their distinction?
A60941	Ought it not more justly to have been expected from a Iew, or a Mahometan?
A60941	Pray what hurt have they done?
A60941	Quid enim insanius?
A60941	Quod si tenemus, cur non& magnitudinis suae,& bonitatis,& aeternitatis,& omnipotentiae suae Generator sit?
A60941	So that the Matter being in effect brought to this point, Whether He shall be too hard for the World, or the World for Him?
A60941	So that we see here what our Author asserts; But may we rely upon it, and hold him to his Word?
A60941	So that, that which removes one, must needs remove the other too?
A60941	That God created the Heavens and the Earth, and that therefore the Three Divine Persons are and must be one, only by an Unity of Mutual Consciousness?
A60941	That One infinite Spirit is Three distinct Infinite Spirits?
A60941	That as Generation and Filiation make two, so Spiration and Procession should make two more?
A60941	That, by which it is it self formally a Person, and that other, which by its Constituting it self a Person, is Constituted and caused by it?
A60941	The Question before him was, Whether the Three Divine Persons were Three Gods?
A60941	There is one Person of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Ghost?
A60941	Was either the Thing it self( as I noted before) of such deep, or sublime Speculation, as not to be reached by them?
A60941	Was it the School, the University, or Gravel- Lane, that taught him this Language?
A60941	Well; and what then?
A60941	What can the meaning of this be?
A60941	What is God?
A60941	What is Intellectual Love( says this Author) but the true Knowledge, or Estimation of Things?
A60941	What is Iustice and Goodness but an equal Distribution of, or a true and wise Proportion of Rewards and Punishments?
A60941	What is perfect Power, but perfect Truth and Wisdom which can do whatsoever it knows?
A60941	What is the Distinction between Essence, and Personality, and Subsistence?
A60941	What is the Substance and Nature of God?
A60941	What then mean those Words of the Creed?
A60941	What then will that old Principle of Nature, 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉, serve for, but to tantalize and torment us?
A60941	What( says our Author) is the Substance, or Nature of God?
A60941	Whereupon I would again learn of him how many steps are necessary to explain Mutual- Conciousness?
A60941	Whether it be so in Infinite?
A60941	Whether or no Self- Consciousness be the Reason of Personality in Finite Persons?
A60941	Whether the three Persons of the Blessed Trinity are not Mutually Conscious to one another of their Mutual In- existence in one another?
A60941	Why does he let St. Austin escape, from whom the Master of the Sentences borrowed most of his Distinctions and Subtleties?
A60941	Why, how then comes a Beast, in page 269. to be a Person?
A60941	Why, in the first place we must search and enquire, whether it be so, or no?
A60941	Why?
A60941	all drawn forth in Rank and File, to have fought his Battels?
A60941	and whether God revealed them for any other purpose than that he might be known and understood by them?
A60941	or, whether there be one between the first and the second?
A60941	the Words and Actions of Men, which they both Exist in, and Converse about?
A61548	Am I bound to believe it or not?
A61548	And are not all the main Articles of the Christian Faith comprehended under it?
A61548	And doth not all this discover no good will to the Scriptures, at least, as they are received among us?
A61548	And from whence comes it?
A61548	And from whence comes such a Denomination?
A61548	And how can those who hold three Persons be Sabellians?
A61548	And how can three Persons be one Person, unless three incommunicable Properties may become one communicated Property to three Persons?
A61548	And how can we but divide the Substance, which we find in three distinct divided Persons?
A61548	And if there are three Persons which have the Divine Nature attributed to them; what must we do in this Case?
A61548	And is not this an admirable Way to bring us to a certainty of Reason?
A61548	And is not this great skill in these Matters, to make such a Parallel between three Persons in the Godhead, and Peter, Iames and Iohn?
A61548	And is not this very good Authority among us?
A61548	And is this all indeed, that is to be said for the being of Substance, that we accustom our selves to suppose a Substratum?
A61548	And is this indeed the great Secret which this bold Man, as they call him, hath discover''d?
A61548	And now let the World judge, how wisely they have interpreted both S. Iohn, and his Commentator Grotius?
A61548	And now what Reason can there be, that any such late Copies should be prefer''d before those which were used by the Greek Fathers?
A61548	And now what do these Men do?
A61548	And so Heaven and Earth are called to bear Witness against obstinate Sinners: May men therefore be baptized in the name of God and his Creatures?
A61548	And that he is the Word, and God of God, from Theophilus Antiochenus?
A61548	And to make his Apostles set up the Worship of a Creature, when their design was to take away the Worship of all such, who by Nature are not Gods?
A61548	And to what purpose then are they brought?
A61548	And upon his bringing Erasmus to prove that it was not in S. Cyprian, S. Hilary, and S. Chrysostome, he cries out, Where is Sincerity?
A61548	And what Answer do they give to this?
A61548	And what Answer doth S. Ambrose give to this?
A61548	And what answer do they give to this?
A61548	And what certainty can we have that he hath not done it?
A61548	And what defence have they since made for themselves?
A61548	And what follows from hence, but that the relative Property is the Foundation of the Personality?
A61548	And what follows?
A61548	And what follows?
A61548	And what greater argument can there be, that it was then the general sense of the Christian Church?
A61548	And what is this, but to own two distinct Substances?
A61548	And what must they think of our Saviour the mean time, who knew the Iews understood him quite otherwise, and would not undeceive them?
A61548	And what saith he to this purpose?
A61548	And what say our Vnitarians to it?
A61548	And what say our Vnitarians to this?
A61548	And what say our Vnitarians to this?
A61548	And what then?
A61548	And what then?
A61548	And what then?
A61548	And what then?
A61548	And wherein is this different, from what all men of Understanding have said?
A61548	And who are these Dominions and Powers?
A61548	Are not then( without Trifling and Fooling) these Real Essences Mysteries to them?
A61548	Are not these very good Christians the mean while?
A61548	Are not three Substances and but one a Contradiction?
A61548	Are they not three Gods?
A61548	Are they resolved to set up Deism among us, and in order thereto, to undermine the authority of the New Testament?
A61548	As of divine Authority?
A61548	As though he allow''d more Gods than one in Number?
A61548	As to the Essence?
A61548	But Eusebius doth not use Hegesippus his words, but his own in that place; and withal, how doth it appear that Hegesippus himself was an Ebionite?
A61548	But after all, why do we assert three Persons in the Godhead?
A61548	But by no means, that the Person of the Father is nothing but the relative Property?
A61548	But can any thing of this Nature be charged upon one, who hath not only written in Defence of it, but speaks of it with the highest Veneration?
A61548	But can one whole entire indivisible Substance be actually divided into three Substances?
A61548	But can these Men of Sense and Reason think, that the Point in Controversie ever was, whether in Numbers, One could be Three, or Three One?
A61548	But can you have a full and evident Perception of a thing, so as to difference it from all others, when you grant it to be Incomprehensible?
A61548	But comes it from a good hand?
A61548	But did they mean three distinct Subsistences, or only one Subsistence sustaining the Names, or Appearances, or Manifestations of three Persons?
A61548	But do these assert, that there is but one subsisting Person, and three only in Name?
A61548	But doth any one imagine, that because Iohn Baptist did enter his Disciples by Baptism, therefore they must believe him to be God?
A61548	But doth he not say, That he hath a Legitimate and proper Substance of his own begotten Nature from God, the Father?
A61548	But doth it follow that they are guilty of Heresie?
A61548	But he will Demonstrate something instead of it?
A61548	But how I pray doth this appear?
A61548	But how came the Preface to be curtail''d in the Ebionite Gospel?
A61548	But how can I comprehend this Attribute of Eternity?
A61548	But how can we but divide the Substance which we see in three distinct divided Persons?
A61548	But how comes Christ to assume that to himself which belong''d to the Word?
A61548	But how comes he to take no notice of this Difference of the Clermont Copy?
A61548	But how comes the general Idea of Substance, to be framed in our Minds?
A61548	But how do our simple Ideas help us out in this Matter?
A61548	But how do they make out this gross Stupidity of theirs?
A61548	But how doth he apply these things to the divine Nature?
A61548	But how doth he make this out?
A61548	But how doth it appear that we have any Power to comprehend what is infinite?
A61548	But how doth it appear, that Beza''s Clermont Copy was the very same which Morinus had?
A61548	But how doth it appear, that he brought in any new Doctrine?
A61548	But how doth it appear, that the Word Mystery is always used in that Sense?
A61548	But how doth that appear?
A61548	But how doth the other Antagonist escape?
A61548	But how far?
A61548	But how if any one Person were left out?
A61548	But how is it possible to understand this?
A61548	But how is this clear''d by the other Party?
A61548	But how then can there be but one individual Essence in all three?
A61548	But how then comes it not to make a distinct Essence, as it makes distinct Persons, by being communicated?
A61548	But how then?
A61548	But how?
A61548	But how?
A61548	But how?
A61548	But if he had so meant it, how could he have expressed it otherwise?
A61548	But if he was for ever, he must be from himself, and what Notion, or Conception can we have in our Minds concerning it?
A61548	But if that be not taken as an Evidence of his being the eternal Son of God, how doth this prove him above Angels?
A61548	But if the Christian Interpreters were such Fools; what think they of the Deists, whom they seem to have a better opinion of, as to their Wisdom?
A61548	But may not Christians have such doubts in their minds?
A61548	But may not each Person have a distinct Essence belonging to him, as we see it is among Men?
A61548	But may not the fame Essence be divided?
A61548	But saith S. Augustin, The Caviller will ask, if there be Three, what Three are they?
A61548	But saith he, Will it not hence follow, that as these are two Men, so the Father and Son in the Divine Essence must be two Gods?
A61548	But the Question is whether the Fathers used it in that sense, so as to imply a difference of Individuals in the same common Essence?
A61548	But they leave out what he saith, and put in what he doth not say; is not this interpreting like Wise men?
A61548	But this is said to be a Contradiction; so it was in the other case and not allow''d then and why should it be otherwise in this?
A61548	But this worthy Author produces other Reasons, which Sandius himself laughs at, and despises?
A61548	But to what purpose?
A61548	But were not the Iews to understand it in the Sense it was known among them?
A61548	But what Bias was it, which made him write with that Strength and Iudgment against their Opinions?
A61548	But what Reason doth he give for it?
A61548	But what are these very strong and weighty Reasons?
A61548	But what consequence do they draw from hence?
A61548	But what do they say to the Old Paraphrases, whereon the main Weight as to this matter lies?
A61548	But what is it which makes the Vnion indissoluble?
A61548	But what is it?
A61548	But what is this Distinction founded upon?
A61548	But what is this to the first Christians of the Church of Ierusalem?
A61548	But what is to know?
A61548	But what reason do they give for it?
A61548	But what reason do they give for such a forced and unusual Sense, besides the avoiding the difficulty of having the Name of God given here to Christ?
A61548	But what saith Grotius himself?
A61548	But what saith S. Augustin to this?
A61548	But what say our Wise Interpreters to this?
A61548	But what then do they think of these passages in his Conferences with the Iews?
A61548	But when you have reckon''d them what is it you have been Counting?
A61548	But whence or how?
A61548	But where doth Grotius say any thing like this?
A61548	But where doth S. Augustin give any such Account of it?
A61548	But where else are these honest, conscientious Deists to be found?
A61548	But where is this said?
A61548	But wherein is it that Eusebius blames them?
A61548	But wherein lies it?
A61548	But wherein lies this Impossibility?
A61548	But wherein then lies the difference in point of Reason?
A61548	But who is to set these Bounds but themselves in all Acts of relative Worship, because they depend upon the intention of the Persons?
A61548	But who made them subject to him?
A61548	But who was this Arian Bishop, and these Campenses?
A61548	But why do we call them Persons, when that Term is not found in Scripture, and is of a doubtful Sense?
A61548	But why must they confound the Persons, if there be but one Essence?
A61548	But will not this overthrow the distinction of Persons and run us into Sabellianism?
A61548	But, if our Reason depend upon our clear and distinct Idea''s; how is this possible?
A61548	By dividing the Substance?
A61548	Can the communicating the divine Essence by the Father to the Son, be called a Name, or a Mode, or a Respect only?
A61548	Can we be certain without any Foundation of Reason?
A61548	Can we learn from them, the difference of Nature and Person?
A61548	Can we suppose them Guilty of such stupidity to lose their Lives, for not giving Divine Honour to Creatures, and at the same time to do it themselves?
A61548	Did God make the Earth and all the living Creatures in it, when he made Man Lord over them?
A61548	Did ever N ● etus or Sabellius, or any of their Followers speak after this manner?
A61548	Did he die to reform them, as well as Mankind?
A61548	Did they all interpret the Scriptures like Fools, and not like Wise Men?
A61548	Did they mean no more, but as any Good man is?
A61548	Do not you comprehend that it is incomprehensible?
A61548	Do the others who maintain a Trinity deny this?
A61548	Do they hope ever to convince Men at this rate of wise interpreting?
A61548	Do they suppose the divine Nature capable of such Division and Separation by Individuals, as human Nature is?
A61548	Do they think there is no difference between an infinitely perfect Being, and such finite limited Creatures as Individuals among Men are?
A61548	Doth Marcion hold this Trinity?
A61548	Doth Origen say all the Iewish Christians there were such?
A61548	Doth he not say, the Arian Bishop, and the Campenses put him upon it?
A61548	Doth he own such a Community of Nature, and Distinction of Individuals there?
A61548	Doth he say they borrowed the Form of Baptism from thence?
A61548	Doth it therefore follow, that there are no Doctrines in the Gospel above the reach and comprehension of our Reason?
A61548	Doth not S. Ambrose say, as Curcellaeus quotes him, That the Father and Son are not two Gods, because all men are said to be of one Substance?
A61548	Doth not by whom all things were created in Heaven and Earth imply, that Heaven and Earth were created by him?
A61548	Doth not this look like a design to furnish the Deists with such arguments as they could meet with against it?
A61548	Doth this prove such a difference, as is among Individuals of the same kind among men?
A61548	Doth this reach the Nature of the thing, or only the manner of our Conception?
A61548	Ecce inquit tres dixisti, sed quid tres exprime?
A61548	Especially, when they say, That S. Iohn doth not oppose them Why then are these Arguments produced against his Gospel?
A61548	Filium quem dicitis, Deum dicitis?
A61548	For I appeal to the common Sense of mankind, whether we can be said to Comprehend that, which we can have no adequate Idea of?
A61548	For according to this Sense, how comes a divine Attribute to be called the Son of Man?
A61548	For the question upon the Creed is, Whether the Substance can be divided?
A61548	For unto which of the Angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee?
A61548	For what is it makes the second Sun to be a true Sun, but having the same Real Essence with the first?
A61548	For what is the old or first Creation, but the making the World, and creating all things in Heaven and Earth?
A61548	For what reason?
A61548	For, if he could have no Cause, what could we think of his being Eternal?
A61548	For, they say, That he held, that as to this question, How many Gods?
A61548	From what evidence?
A61548	Grant he was so, yet how doth it appear that all the Iewish Christians were at that time Ebionites or Cerinthians?
A61548	Had all men lost their Senses in Theodoret''s time?
A61548	Had he no more skill in Arithmetick than to say there are Three and yet but One?
A61548	Have the Brutes and Trinitarians learnt Arithmetick together?
A61548	Have they any new Books of Scripture to judge by?
A61548	Have we not now a very comfortable account of the Canon of the New Testament from these ancient Vnitarians?
A61548	He answers, Why not, since we call Body and Soul by the Name of the Man?
A61548	He granted that they were one Essence, one Nature, one Substance: but how?
A61548	He grants to Praxeas, that Father, Son and Holy Ghost are one, but how?
A61548	He pretends to Demonstrate; but what I pray?
A61548	How are the Angels created by him and for him?
A61548	How can that be said to be the Son of God begotten of the Father, without Division, before all Worlds, as he quotes it from Iustin Martyr?
A61548	How can that be?
A61548	How can the Substance be distinct, if it be the very same; and the Son subsist in that Substance of which he was begotten?
A61548	How can these things consist?
A61548	How can this be consistent with deducing our Certainty of Knowledge from clear and simple Ideas?
A61548	How can this distinction be?
A61548	How come the Mysteries of Faith to require more Knowledge than the Nature of Man is capable of?
A61548	How could the Son of Man be said to ascend thither, where a divine Attribute was before?
A61548	How could this be, if all the Christians were out of his reach, then being setled about Pella?
A61548	How doth that appear?
A61548	How doth that appear?
A61548	How doth this appear to be very probable?
A61548	How is it possible for Three to be but One?
A61548	How is this possible, if a Person doth suppose some peculiar Property, which must distinguish him from all others?
A61548	How so?
A61548	How so?
A61548	How then can our Vnitarians pretend, That the Ante- Nicene Fathers did not alledge the Form of Baptism to prove the Trinity?
A61548	How then can we know, that of which we can have no adequate Idea?
A61548	How then is it possible to understand S. Basil of more Gods than one in number?
A61548	I allow he Reason to be very good, but the Question I ask is, whether this Argument be from the clear and distinct Idea or not?
A61548	I desire to know, Whether the Adoration of such were Idolatry or not?
A61548	If it be said to be the same Specifick Nature; then how comes that which is in it self capable of Division to make an indissoluble Vnion?
A61548	If it be, is it the same individual Essence, or not?
A61548	If it extends to all the other things, doth it exclude this, which is the first mention''d?
A61548	If it were necessary to be believed, why is it not more plainly revealed?
A61548	If only some parts of Matter have a power of Thinking, how comes so great a difference in the Properties of the same Matter?
A61548	If the same individual Essence makes the inseparable Union, what is it, which makes the difference of individuals?
A61548	If their arguments are mean and trifling and merely precarious, why are they not slighted and answered by such as pretend to be Christians?
A61548	If they are false, why do they not answer them?
A61548	If they are true, why do they not affirm them?
A61548	If they do understand them, why do they say, They do not, nor can not?
A61548	In the former Testimony, the authority of the Vulgar Latin was made use of: and why, is it rejected here?
A61548	Interrogant enim nos aliquando Infideles,& dicunt, Patrem quem dicitis, Deum dicitis?
A61548	Into the Father?
A61548	Into the Holy Ghost?
A61548	Into the Son?
A61548	Is it like wise Men, to go upon such grounds as will justifie both Pagan and Popish Idolatry?
A61548	Is it not rather exposing and ridiculing them?
A61548	Is it not to have adequate Ideas of the things we know?
A61548	Is it possible for Men that live in our Age to give such an account as this of the Growth of Deism and Atheism among us?
A61548	Is it the Vnity of the Essence or not?
A61548	Is it the attributing a general Name to them?
A61548	Is not the like Equity to be shew ● d in another though different Explication?
A61548	Is not this Subtle and deep Reasoning?
A61548	Is not this a fine turn?
A61548	Is not this a rare Specimen of Wise interpreting, and Fair dealing with so considerable a Person, and so well known, as Grotius?
A61548	Is not this a rare way of fixing the Boundaries of Faith and Reason?
A61548	Is not this a very strong and weighty Reason?
A61548	Is not this doing great Honour to our Saviour?
A61548	Is not this fair dealing with such a Man as S. Basil, to represent his Sense quite otherwise than it is?
A61548	Is not this interpreting like wise Men indeed?
A61548	Is that Custom grounded upon true Reason or not?
A61548	Is the divine Essence but a mere Name, or a different respect only to Mankind?
A61548	Is this Wise interpreting?
A61548	Is this a sufficient reason or not?
A61548	Is this by Abstracting and inlarging simple Ideas?
A61548	Is this interpreting Scripture like Wise men, to deny Divine Worship to be given to our Saviour when the Scripture so plainly requires it?
A61548	Is this interpreting Scripture like wise Men, to take advantage of all Omissions in Copies, when those which are entire ought to be preferr''d?
A61548	Is this interpreting the Scriptures like wise Men?
A61548	Is this right?
A61548	Is this sufficient to charge such a Person with the Sabellian Heresy, which he utterly disowns?
A61548	Is this to interpret Scripture like Wise men, to make our Saviour''s meaning to be expressly contrary to his Words?
A61548	It is easie to guess whom these kind Words were intended for: And are not these very modest and civil Expressions?
A61548	It''s very true; but how doth this prove that there is a God?
A61548	Let the Case be now put as to the Trinity; do you believe the Doctrine of it, as of Divine Revelation?
A61548	Must not this be a very learned Critick who could mention S. Ierom, as Translator of S. Matthews Gospel into Greek?
A61548	Must we cast off the Vnity of the Divine Essence?
A61548	Must we quit Christ''s being the Messias, because the Jews deny it?
A61548	Must we reject those Scriptures which attribute Divinity to the Son and Holy Ghost, as well as to the Father?
A61548	Must we renounce the Christian Doctrine to please the Jews and Mahometans?
A61548	No, Are they not three Almighties?
A61548	No, they may say, but ye who hold three Persons must think so: For what reason?
A61548	Non tres omnipotentes?
A61548	Now if Christ were taken up into Heaven, as Moses was into the Mount, why was it not made publick at that time?
A61548	Now if both Parties mean what they say, where lies the difference?
A61548	Now what Prolation can there be of a meer Attribute?
A61548	Now what was this Doctrine of Noetus?
A61548	Now what was this unheard of Doctrine of Noetus?
A61548	Now wherein doth this differ from the present Hypothesis?
A61548	Now, what is the Subject in this case?
A61548	Now, what saith the Vnitarian to this, who pretended to Answer me?
A61548	Number, saith he again, belongs to Quantity, and Quantity to Bodies, but what relation have these to God, but as he is the Maker of them?
A61548	Nunc mihi Calumniator respondeat, quid ergo tres?
A61548	Of mere Names or Cyphers, or of one God and two Creatures joyned in the same Form of words, as our Vnitarians understand it?
A61548	Of mere Names or Energies?
A61548	Of what?
A61548	One God the Father, and one God the Son; how can this be, and yet not two Gods?
A61548	Or Paulus Alciatus, who from a Unitarian turned Mahometan?
A61548	Or as other Hereticks, three Principles or three Gods?
A61548	Or doth our Reason give us true Notions of things, without these Idea''s?
A61548	Or rather was Man said to create them, because he was made their Head?
A61548	Or the suffering of Christ, because the Mahometans think it inconsistent with his Honour?
A61548	Or were they all turned Ebionites then?
A61548	Peter, and Iames, and Iohn, are all true and real Men; but what is it which makes them so?
A61548	Quare hoc non est ita ibi?
A61548	Quid sunt isti tres?
A61548	Respondemus Deum Spiritum Sanctum quem dicitis, Deum dicitis?
A61548	St. Augustin mentions it as such, when he saith, the Infidels sometimes ask us, what do you call the Father?
A61548	That the Father and Son are divided from each other, as they were?
A61548	The Israelites were baptized unto Moses; but how?
A61548	The Man Christ Iesus?
A61548	The Point in hand?
A61548	The question is, Whether this be interpreting those Scriptures which speak of the Honour and Worship due to Christ, like wise Men?
A61548	The question is, whether the distinct Properties of the Persons do imply a Division of the Substance?
A61548	Then they were asked, Why they used those terms?
A61548	They know there are such by the Ideas of their Properties, but know nothing of their Real Essence; and yet they will not allow them to be Mysteries?
A61548	They may tell them, as they do us that they can have no Ideas, no clear and distinct Perceptions of immaterial Substances?
A61548	Very true: But can you have a clear and distinct Idea of what you can not comprehend?
A61548	Very true; but is all this contained in the simple Idea of these Operations?
A61548	Was he not bound to undeceive them, when he knew they did so grossly mis- understand him, if he knew himself to be a meer Man at the same time?
A61548	Was it not by force of Arms and the Prevalency of the Saracen and Turkish Empire?
A61548	Was not his whole design in that Book to prove three distinct Persons of Father, Son and Holy Ghost, and yet but One God?
A61548	Was the Morocco Ambassador one of them?
A61548	Was this mystical Sense primarily intended or not?
A61548	We can not reason without clear Ideas, and yet we may be certain without them: Can we be certain without Reason?
A61548	Well, but what is this creating or disposing things into a new order?
A61548	Were ever wise Men driven to such miserable Shifts?
A61548	Were not those Iewish Christians?
A61548	What Christian Ingenuity is here?
A61548	What Proof, what Evidence, what credible Witnesses of it, as there were of his Transfiguration, Resurrection and Ascension?
A61548	What Trinity do they mean?
A61548	What a false and spiteful Inference is this?
A61548	What an honest- hearted Deist do they make that Impostor Mahomet?
A61548	What another sort of character is this from that of the greatest, and in their opinion the best of our Clergy?
A61548	What answer do they give in this case?
A61548	What are these Three?
A61548	What can be the meaning of this if he did not take it for granted, that the Christian Church embraced the Doctrine of the Trinity in Baptism?
A61548	What can satisfie such men, who are content with such an answer?
A61548	What can this prove, but that we may call God and his Creatures to be Witnesses together of the same thing?
A61548	What could they mean, if they did not believe them to have the same Divine Nature?
A61548	What disposition of Matter is required to thinking?
A61548	What do these men mean by such suggestions as these?
A61548	What do these men mean, to charge one who goes upon these grounds with Sabellianism?
A61548	What if S. Paul name the elect Angels in a solemn Obtestation to Timothy, together with God, and the Lord Iesus Christ?
A61548	What is now become of the general Consent of the Christian Church, East and West?
A61548	What is that bare Essence without the Powers and Properties belonging to it?
A61548	What is that?
A61548	What is the meaning of this, but that we can not have an adequate Idea of any thing?
A61548	What is the meaning of this?
A61548	What must these men think the Christian Church hath been made up of all this while?
A61548	What number of Atheists is there, upon any other account than from a looseness of Thinking and Living?
A61548	What say our Vnitarians to this?
A61548	What say our Wise Interpreters to all this?
A61548	What should make Beza pass it over here?
A61548	What strange way of arguing would this have been?
A61548	What that is, whereby we perceive the difference of Individuals?
A61548	What that is, which really makes two Beings of the same kind to be different from each other?
A61548	What the Holy Ghost?
A61548	What the Son?
A61548	What then would they say of the rest?
A61548	What then?
A61548	What would Iulian have given for such a Wise Interpretation of S. Iohn?
A61548	What would these wise Interpreters have?
A61548	What, and if ye shall see the Son of Man ascending where he was before?
A61548	What, if Men without Biass of Interest, or Education think ours the more proper and agreeable Sense?
A61548	What, nothing but good Words to him?
A61548	What?
A61548	When God is said to be an incomprehensible Being; who before them did understand the meaning to be, That we can not comprehend that there is a God?
A61548	Where is the least Intimation given, that he look''d on the divine Persons as Modes and Respects only?
A61548	Whether a specifick divine Nature be not inconsistent with the absolute Perfection, and necessary Existence which belongs to it?
A61548	Whether it was accounted a monstrous Paradox and Contradiction, where Persons were not sway''d by Force and Interest?
A61548	Whether their Doctrine about the Trinity or ours, be more agreeable to the sense of Scripture and Antiquity?
A61548	Whether there be any ground of common reason, on which it can be justly charged with Nonsense, Impossibilities and Contradiction?
A61548	Whether there can be more Individuals, where there is no Dissimilitude, and can be no Division or Separation?
A61548	Which arise from the shallowness of Mens Capacities, and not from the repugnancy of Things: and who can help Mens Understandings?
A61548	Who are they?
A61548	Who are those Historians who give this character of him?
A61548	Who denies it?
A61548	Who denies, that one Person may have different Respects, and yet be but one Person subsisting?
A61548	Why are these strong Reasons of learned Criticks mentioned, but to raise Doubts in Peoples minds about them?
A61548	Why are they not named, that their authority might be examin''d?
A61548	Why did he not conceal it,( as some would have done) and only represent to the Emperours, the fair and plausible part of Christianity?
A61548	Why not the time and place mention''d in Scripture, as well as of his Fasting and Temptation?
A61548	Why then should these clear and simple Ideas be made the sole Foundation of Reason?
A61548	Will they make this a Contradiction too?
A61548	Will they say, the Holy Ghost was there added for the sake of Montanus his Paraclete?
A61548	Will you hold to this Principle?
A61548	and if these are real Mysteries in Nature, why may not the same term be used for Matters of Faith?
A61548	and of the Commentators upon this Creed?
A61548	and to what end?
A61548	but doth my argument proceed upon that, or upon the not having a distinct and clear Idea of a Spirit?
A61548	in the Idea of our Selves?
A61548	no Cerinthians among them?
A61548	non tres Dii?
A61548	none that had common sense, and could tell the difference between One and Three?
A61548	or honest and fair dealing?
A61548	were there no Men among them but the Vnitarians?
A61548	why no Appearance of the Glory to satisfie Mankind of the truth of it?
A61548	why no Witnesses?