Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
A61877All Phlebotomy draweth from the Circumference to the Center: when he reasons thus?
A61877All poysons do not ingender a Feaver in him that takes them: why should we think otherwise of Plagues?
A61877An etiam purpurati veneni essentiae diversitas variare purpurae symptomata poterit?
A61877An illa impediunt motum naturae?
A61877And Ballonius observes:"An commode praescribi possunt medicamenta antiquam morbilli se produnt?
A61877And doth not such a condensation, dryness and heat indicate a befitting relaxation and humectation?
A61877And may I not ask, if the Spirits be n ● t the immediate Instruments of the Soul?
A61877And since it is natural( and Nature is constant) why is not the Disease more ancient and universal than it appears to be?
A61877And that Chymistry was not in use with Aristotle and his Sectators?
A61877And why we may not do it in this Disease?
A61877Are we not obliged to facilitate and secure the Crisis by convenient means before it approach?
A61877Besides, How is it a Crisis, when there seldom proceeds any Coction, and when the preceeding Disease observes no times?
A61877Besides, who in Physick ever found out such a Rule, as Vrgency, or a Cura coacta did not absolve the Practitioner from its obligation at sometimes?
A61877Besides, who would not allow us to create him a little trouble or weakness,( easie to be repaired) thereby to recover him from a greater evil?
A61877Besides, whoever defined a Feaver so as to make its Gen ● ● ● to be An Accident?
A61877But what is all this to a Feaver- Fire, and Reading by it?
A61877But, What is it that Ecebolius doth purpose to himself?
A61877By the difference of the Character, who would not imagine that he reflected on me as Red- Headed?
A61877Do I speak of the Methods of Physick, Chirurgery, or any Practical Art?
A61877Do not we see this frequently to happen, where no irritation hath been through Sudorifics, or other Medicaments?
A61877Doth any man imagine it possible that Civil Society can subsist, if such Practices as these be tolerated?
A61877Doth not Collado argue judiciously against the generality of that Assertion?
A61877Doth not Hippocrates caution us against the returning in of an Erysipelas?
A61877Doth not then Nature add to the redundance of blood by a defective transpiration; whereas the veins are so full as not to be able to contain more?
A61877First I observe that the Galenists are at a difference whether the Mass of blood contain those Humours actually, or only potentially?
A61877For why may not we in England bear that which they do in Holland?
A61877H. V.) and pleaded earnestly for an Indulgence towards them in the Liturgical way, deserved best at their Hands?
A61877Have my Adversaries?
A61877He hath now varied the Letter, and saith Red hot; is not this the Sophistication of a gross Lye?
A61877Hence even a man that is a speculative Artist( how much more those that are neither speculative, nor Empirics?)
A61877How much blood doth he account to be a great Quantity?
A61877I come now to the practise of Phlebotomy, about which sundry Questions arise: As, Whether it may be` administred in the beginng of the Disease?
A61877I come now to the third Question: Whether in the State of the Small Pox Phlebotomy may by administred?
A61877I know not how diligent our Observatour was, when he took notice of such as miscarried upon Phlebotomy: were the Physicians besitting Artists?
A61877I would willingly know how this Arch ● us doth frame the Idaea of a disease?
A61877If it be Hypocrisie to defend the Monarchy, Religion, and Universities of this Nation: What Bottom do you stand on?
A61877If such an habit of body be thus perillous during perfect health, how ought a Physician to apprehend it upon the first approaches of sickness?
A61877If the Small Pox be a Crisis of the Feaver, what influence hath that consid ● ration upon us, before the time of the Crisis?
A61877If the thing did succeed, I inquire, Whether it will constantly, or most commonly follow upon the like causes and circumstances?
A61877In the State?
A61877Is it a true Maxime in Natural Philosophy, which in Law sometimes passeth currently?
A61877Is it not prudential, were a little blood so precious a thing, and the loss thereof attended with some small irrepairable debility?
A61877Is it upon this sentiment that Physicians reiterate their Phlebotomies?
A61877Is this the effect of that Revulsion, that the Humors should slow more inward?
A61877Material or Im ● ● terial?
A61877Must we then abandon Nature to her self, and stand Idle Spectators amidst so great and visible dangers?
A61877Nay, doth not he tell us, that in his way?
A61877O ● on ▪ Can not an Accident be the product of a fore going cause?
A61877Or whether it is a rare accident?
A61877Or, How do you expect to be served?
A61877Or, doth not he rather deserve to be wonder''d at, that should expect in so different circumstances for resembling effects?
A61877Other remedy there is none: and what imports it, if the attempt be hazardous, since the omission is likely to be more fatal?
A61877Praeterea quid sensui respondebimus?
A61877Quod ob facinus tam egregium quae non tibi laudes, vir praestantissime, quae non soteria debentur?
A61877Quorsum sine ulla indicatione audet Medicus turbare crisin?
A61877Rouse is dead) the Trooping Divines, the Decipherer of his Majestie''s Letters, the Followers of Oliver, and King Dick, not to mention others?
A61877Sed quod dicemus objectioni illi?
A61877That which may in some persons, and in some circumstances incline unto a Feaver, is never the proper remedy of a Feaver?
A61877The last Question is, Whether in the declination of the Disease a Physician may practise Phlebotomy?
A61877The second Question is; Whether in the AUGMENT or increase of the Small Pox, it be lawful to let the Patient bleed?
A61877Though it hath been disputed, and is still, How Uision is performed, and where?
A61877Was He Reverend, Learned, and Ingenious?
A61877Was He the only Man that spoke Sense in the Age of Non- sense?
A61877Was it, Generous Sirs, any Faction in me, or the Testimony of a Factious Spirit to oppose the Presbyterians?
A61877What Prayers, what Graces he uttered in those Families?
A61877What becomes of the duumvirate then?
A61877What consequence is there in his Argument, that because they do not deceive us on Earth, therefore they will not in the Skie?
A61877Whether in the Pest it be lawful and beneficial to let blood?
A61877Whether the Pest be a Feaver 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉?
A61877Who can Dispute with such men as these?
A61877Who ever denied that Diseases were cured by these Physicians, using Reason, Experience, and General Rules?
A61877Who is now the impertinent?
A61877Who knows not, how Herbary had been improved by Theophrastus, Dioscorides, the Arabians, and other Peripateticks, in like manner?
A61877Why also are splenetic persons( in whom we may best suppose such a Diathesis) not inclined to Pleurisies; except the spurious and flatulent ones?
A61877Will the generous Cavaliers endure this from a Rump- Chaplain?
A61877Would He overthrow all our Laws as well as the Act of Oblivion?
A61877Yet is there no man that can rationally condemn bleeding in that Disease?
A61877and After the Pox come forth?
A61877and Declination?
A61877and from the surface to the center?
A61877and what this Idaea of a Feaver is?
A61877and withall( because my knowledge is not the adequate Measure of possibilities in nature) Whether it were done?
A61877did the Patient, and all Attendants faithfully discharge their duty?
A61877hath Mr. R. B. declared thus much in Print yet?
A61877in those Dayes: And I cast my self upon the Royallists for my Judges; What say ● ee Gentlemen?
A61877or can there be such an heat, without an obstipation thereof?
A61877or practise them at all in the Itch, Leprosie, or Erysipelas?
A61877or that more than one at White- chappel, should suffer by his ill- advised Pepper- drops?
A61877or, was it a Crime then to serve my Patron?
A61877that which is properly Blood, Melancholy, Choler and Phlegm are the constitutive parts of the Blood, in its natural consistence and Crasis?
A61877to return — G. T. his own words: Is it a Substance, or an accident?