quadgram

This is a table of type quadgram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.

quadgram	frequency
by the act par	208
in the case of	175
it may be doubted	161
by the civil law	161
that is to say	158
the lords of session	132
in so far as	108
by this act the	98
but so it is	98
early english books online	96
in favours of the	95
as is clear by	95
the bishop of st	92
the act of parliament	91
it is fit to	90
this act it is	84
the time of the	84
at the instance of	82
by this act it	80
by the law of	69
by the act of	66
to which it was	64
is fit to know	63
this act of parliament	62
is clear by the	61
a part of the	61
the consent of the	61
for the same reason	59
the lords of the	59
part of the act	59
the earl of tarras	57
the scots and picts	57
by the common law	56
the late earl of	54
under the pain of	53
ought not to be	53
to the knowledge of	53
in the act par	53
in presence of the	52
as was found in	52
to the prejudice of	52
the nature of the	51
lords of the session	51
is not to be	50
notes for div a	50
it is to be	50
and it may be	50
and by the act	50
the knowledge of an	49
represented either as utf	48
though by this act	48
by the canon law	48
characters represented either as	48
by the name of	47
as well as the	47
but it may be	46
to this it is	44
in the civil law	43
as in the case	43
is said to be	42
nor can it be	42
there can be no	42
and that it was	42
by act of parliament	42
was found in the	41
by the laws of	41
are not to be	41
the date of the	40
without the consent of	40
the law of nature	40
the interest of the	40
that by this act	39
in place of the	39
to be preferred to	39
to which it is	39
that the earl of	39
it was found that	39
that it is not	38
the acts of parliament	38
and as to the	37
at the same time	37
to the lords of	37
by sir george mackenzie	37
on the other hand	36
to the earl of	36
this it is answered	36
by an act of	36
the opinion of the	36
the law of god	35
and the reason of	35
the colledge of justice	35
robert baillie of jerviswood	35
his majesties privy council	35
there could be no	35
and this is the	35
the reason of this	35
by the lords of	34
the law of nations	34
they are to be	34
of the three estates	34
that part of the	34
within year and day	34
the act of the	34
knowledge of an inquest	34
and therefore it is	33
may be doubted whether	33
of his majesties privy	33
by this act all	33
of the lords of	33
an act of parliament	33
and it is very	32
to the civil law	32
ought to be preferred	32
as if he had	32
and the reason why	32
where there is no	32
at the time of	31
late earl of argile	31
the instance of the	31
yet it may be	31
it may be answered	31
in the same way	31
of the colledge of	31
are by this act	30
fit to know that	30
could not have been	30
the reason of the	30
before the lords of	30
by the act sess	30
the earl of argile	30
which it was answered	30
is one of the	29
the nearest of kin	29
if they be not	29
be said to be	29
within a double tressure	29
that they could not	29
this part of the	29
and for the same	29
to be seen in	29
the law of england	29
if it had been	29
from the date of	29
the words of the	29
art and part of	28
with the coat of	28
it could not be	28
words of the act	28
of the earl of	28
of the civil law	28
as to the first	28
that it was not	28
though it may be	28
be preferred to the	27
the laws of the	27
if there was a	27
the king and his	27
if he had not	27
the rest of the	27
and if it be	27
that it should be	27
the lords of erection	27
they could not be	27
which it is answered	27
it may be alledged	27
that he could not	26
the design of the	26
of their own nature	26
in the reign of	26
according to the terms	26
act of this parliament	26
in mind that in	25
have been transformed into	25
and this is called	25
therefore by this act	25
to the terms of	25
have right to the	25
that can be made	25
that it may be	25
in the time of	25
is to be seen	25
the officers of state	24
instances will never have	24
of textual data within	24
created by converting tcp	24
text is available for	24
or elements to simplify	24
the image sets published	24
encoded texts based on	24
textual data within the	24
works in english were	24
errors will remain and	24
then their works are	24
or tei g elements	24
each text was proofread	24
work described above is	24
with changes to facilitate	24
text and markup reviewed	24
issued variously as sgml	24
or later edition of	24
though they be not	24
simplify the filling in	24
been issued variously as	24
the tei in libraries	24
published by proquest via	24
published between and available	24
to produce large quantities	24
of michigan and oxford	24
a work was chosen	24
a compelling reason to	24
the public domain as	24
work was chosen if	24
of tcp data is	24
limit of instances per	24
the keyers to be	24
and markup guidelines are	24
divided into two phases	24
and available in eebo	24
accuracy and those which	24
with level of the	24
and or corrected and	24
the process of creating	24
editions of a works	24
are available at the	24
on the image sets	24
any assumptions that can	24
the power of the	24
there was a compelling	24
the first part of	24
markup reviewed and edited	24
quantities of textual data	24
gaps by user contributors	24
quality assurance was then	24
texts have been issued	24
to encode one copy	24
the publisher proquest to	24
therefore chose to create	24
the overall quality of	24
quality of tcp data	24
proofread for accuracy and	24
within the usual project	24
texts for their own	24
first editions of a	24
enhanced and or corrected	24
users should bear in	24
i text is available	24
by the institutions providing	24
although there are a	24
keying and markup guidelines	24
encoded as gap s	24
respectfully request that due	24
made about the data	24
understanding these processes should	24
and coded from proquest	24
will never have been	24
we respectfully request that	24
and characters marked as	24
editorial teams in oxford	24
whichever is the greater	24
the kings of scotland	24
the terms of creative	24
domain as of january	24
to the keyers to	24
mnemonic sdata character entities	24
now take and use	24
guidelines are available at	24
on the new cambridge	24
structural encoding based on	24
should make clear that	24
the text can be	24
financial support to the	24
usually the first edition	24
the usual project restraints	24
public domain as of	24
anyone can now take	24
phase i text is	24
illegibles were encoded as	24
copies of the texts	24
over a wide variety	24
encoding based on the	24
of every monographic english	24
text was proofread for	24
those which did not	24
elements of known extent	24
reason to do so	24
of works in other	24
online text creation partnership	24
owned by the institutions	24
aimed to produce large	24
the good of the	24
been looked at by	24
with mnemonic sdata character	24
that in all likelihood	24
did not meet qa	24
intended to range over	24
which did not meet	24
accordance with level of	24
qa standards were returned	24
of a work was	24
into the public domain	24
selection was based on	24
any remaining illegibles were	24
released into the public	24
been released into the	24
can now take and	24
books online text creation	24
of creating the tcp	24
while the overall quality	24
be made about the	24
or for an anonymous	24
the text encoding initiative	24
standards were returned to	24
proquest to create accurately	24
will remain and some	24
should bear in mind	24
use these texts for	24
was a compelling reason	24
meet qa standards were	24
as illegible were corrected	24
data is very good	24
language title published between	24
a wide variety of	24
were encoded and linked	24
and use these texts	24
is given to their	24
is to encode one	24
be aware of the	24
during phase of the	24
creating the tcp texts	24
is a partnership between	24
possible up to a	24
proquest via their early	24
returned to the keyers	24
and markup reviewed and	24
of each text was	24
never have been looked	24
a second or later	24
images in accordance with	24
extent have been transformed	24
all without asking permission	24
their early english books	24
tcp is a partnership	24
to range over a	24
marked as illegible were	24
aware of the process	24
tcp data is very	24
the new cambridge bibliography	24
the texts were encoded	24
images scanned from microfilm	24
or text strings within	24
some errors will remain	24
of the act of	24
general aim of eebo	24
where possible up to	24
unicode or text strings	24
project have been released	24
assurance was then carried	24
image sets were sent	24
to tei p using	24
to the early english	24
users should be aware	24
by proquest via their	24
and some readable characters	24
of the project have	24
partnership between the universities	24
characters or elements to	24
sets were sent to	24
and the publisher proquest	24
process of creating the	24
was proofread for accuracy	24
texts based on the	24
remain and some readable	24
of the tei in	24
of a works in	24
out by editorial teams	24
oxford and the publisher	24
a partnership between the	24
converting tcp files to	24
request that due credit	24
the king of scotland	24
ascii text with mnemonic	24
mainly structural encoding based	24
included and sometimes a	24
tcp project was divided	24
texts were encoded and	24
text can be copied	24
into placeholder characters or	24
keyers to be redone	24
universities of michigan and	24
compelling reason to do	24
at the text creation	24
to page images in	24
the true nature of	24
bear in mind that	24
known extent have been	24
cannot be said to	24
range over a wide	24
works are eligible for	24
in oxford and michigan	24
support to the early	24
selection was intended to	24
the encoding was enhanced	24
lords of his majesties	24
processes should make clear	24
overall quality of tcp	24
edition of a work	24
sent to external keying	24
large quantities of textual	24
coded from proquest page	24
unicode or tei g	24
was intended to range	24
was chosen if there	24
markup guidelines are available	24
between and available in	24
encoding was enhanced and	24
from proquest page images	24
corrected and characters marked	24
external keying companies for	24
assumptions that can be	24
given to their original	24
terms of creative commons	24
iv tiff page images	24
were sent to external	24
described above is co	24
encoded and linked to	24
characters marked as illegible	24
reflect the true nature	24
for transcription and basic	24
level of the tei	24
project was divided into	24
but we respectfully request	24
this keyboarded and encoded	24
by a tcp editor	24
works in other languages	24
can be made about	24
teams in oxford and	24
transcription and basic encoding	24
to external keying companies	24
in english were prioritized	24
even for commercial purposes	24
tcp aimed to produce	24
keyed and coded from	24
as opposed to critical	24
sometimes a second or	24
the universities of michigan	24
bibliography of english literature	24
accurately transcribed and encoded	24
tei in libraries guidelines	24
nature of the print	24
usual project restraints of	24
the project have been	24
looked at by a	24
there are a number	24
all likelihood such instances	24
providing financial support to	24
by editorial teams in	24
institutions providing financial support	24
tcp assigned for keying	24
for accuracy and those	24
these texts for their	24
created during phase of	24
tcp is to encode	24
and those which did	24
were returned to the	24
true nature of the	24
of the texts have	24
and oxford and the	24
a wing m estc	24
was based on the	24
elements to simplify the	24
and therefore chose to	24
processed by university of	24
these processes should make	24
wide variety of subject	24
available at the text	24
the texts have been	24
new cambridge bibliography of	24
therefore of any assumptions	24
that due credit and	24
the filling in of	24
via their early english	24
and attribution is given	24
remaining illegibles were encoded	24
print record of the	24
and therefore of any	24
number of works in	24
text with mnemonic sdata	24
second or later edition	24
for their own purposes	24
data within the usual	24
edition of the work	24
king robert the d	24
will be marked as	24
english books online text	24
of instances per text	24
likelihood such instances will	24
creation partnership web site	24
text creation partnership web	24
was then carried out	24
publisher proquest to create	24
and not to the	24
their works are eligible	24
transcribed and encoded texts	24
filling in of gaps	24
and encoded texts based	24
then carried out by	24
by university of nebraska	24
tei p using tcp	24
have been released into	24
companies for transcription and	24
opposed to critical editions	24
and sometimes a second	24
of any assumptions that	24
to reflect the true	24
in of gaps by	24
the institutions providing financial	24
attribution is given to	24
of gaps by user	24
title published between and	24
was enhanced and or	24
a works in english	24
or corrected and characters	24
placeholder characters or elements	24
some readable characters will	24
is available for reuse	24
to such as are	24
be marked as illegible	24
was divided into two	24
illegible were corrected where	24
characters will be marked	24
to their original source	24
should be aware of	24
of the process of	24
are a number of	24
readable characters will be	24
michigan and oxford and	24
based on the new	24
based on the image	24
text selection was based	24
between the universities of	24
and encoded edition of	24
files to tei p	24
to a limit of	24
the early english books	24
cambridge bibliography of english	24
and linked to page	24
of the work described	24
linked to page images	24
based on the text	24
create accurately transcribed and	24
encoded text transcribed from	24
it would seem that	24
this phase i text	24
in all likelihood such	24
are eligible for inclusion	24
assigned for keying and	24
variety of subject areas	24
in the hands of	24
up to a limit	24
for keying and markup	24
a number of works	24
the work described above	24
sets published by proquest	24
the general aim of	24
project restraints of time	24
record of the period	24
notably latin and welsh	24
of known extent have	24
to create diplomatic transcriptions	24
produce large quantities of	24
for an anonymous work	24
credit and attribution is	24
by converting tcp files	24
tcp files to tei	24
have been looked at	24
restraints of time and	24
in accordance with level	24
the text creation partnership	24
to simplify the filling	24
mind that in all	24
chosen if there was	24
keyboarded and encoded edition	24
later edition of a	24
were corrected where possible	24
chose to create diplomatic	24
a limit of instances	24
such instances will never	24
at by a tcp	24
carried out by editorial	24
take and use these	24
been transformed into placeholder	24
page images in accordance	24
of time and funding	24
transformed into placeholder characters	24
of the print record	24
for the good of	24
have been issued variously	24
p using tcp tei	24
phase of the project	24
encoded edition of the	24
image sets published by	24
were encoded as gap	24
keying companies for transcription	24
changes to facilitate morpho	24
the print record of	24
due credit and attribution	24
not meet qa standards	24
gap elements of known	24
wing m estc r	24
to create accurately transcribed	24
texts created during phase	24
the lords of his	24
corrected where possible up	24
text strings within braces	24
on the text encoding	24
estc r ocm this	23
that they are not	23
m estc r ocm	23
and whereas it is	23
and therefore it was	23
if he had been	23
reproduction of original in	23
and it is not	23
the act of this	23
it has been doubted	23
the reign of king	23
in the books of	23
as a part of	23
by the foresaid act	23
are only to be	23
ocm this keyboarded and	23
quartered with the coat	23
but by the act	23
r ocm this keyboarded	23
though it be not	23
that they should be	23
by which it is	22
is only to be	22
this act is formerly	22
king james the sixth	22
in that case the	22
of such as are	22
upon the account of	22
and such as are	22
and though it may	22
to be punished by	22
the pain of death	22
be taken away by	22
and by this act	22
but by this act	22
so far as they	22
at the mercat cross	22
is now in desuetude	22
may be doubted if	22
found in the case	22
to be holden of	22
which it may be	21
any part of the	21
the earl of forth	21
that there is a	21
in the construction of	21
for an onerous cause	21
the crime was committed	21
so far as concerns	21
the word of god	21
has right to the	21
to the laws of	21
the kings of england	21
out of the countrey	21
the crown of england	21
the depositions of witnesses	21
though there be no	21
i see not why	21
the construction of law	21
interest of the common	21
the same to the	21
observations upon the act	21
the antiquity of the	21
the authority of the	21
in the observations upon	21
by this act to	21
to the common law	21
if they were not	21
if they had been	21
is not able to	21
is punishable by death	20
the matter of fact	20
in the first instance	20
the half of the	20
to the nature of	20
it were hard to	20
king charles the first	20
lords of session are	20
whereas it is pretended	20
upon the other hand	20
the reason why the	20
are to be punished	20
by the same reason	20
that there was a	20
with the consent of	20
and though this act	20
is founded upon the	20
though this act appoints	20
no man can be	20
that he did not	20
if there be no	20
but on the contrary	20
of the nature of	20
that the king may	20
is declared to be	20
the eldest sons of	20
head burgh of the	20
observable from this act	19
the parliament of paris	19
without consent of the	19
the head burgh of	19
was found by the	19
but if there be	19
as to this point	19
it is very observable	19
the place where the	19
belong to the king	19
such as have been	19
is not obliged to	19
of its own nature	19
to be in the	19
that there was no	19
that he should be	19
that the scots were	19
be seen in the	19
and it is most	19
against the law of	19
the reason of which	19
part of this act	19
in the person of	19
the observations upon the	19
therefore it may be	19
by this act also	19
this seems to be	19
it is observable that	19
and therefore by this	19
shall answer to god	19
only in the case	19
to rise in arms	19
and if this were	19
to be extended to	19
so long a time	19
any of his majesties	19
under the great seal	19
yet by the act	19
was not to be	19
that the lords of	19
king iames the sixth	19
to him by the	19
after the death of	19
even in that case	19
the lords found that	19
a double tressure counterflowred	19
to the duke of	18
the laws of god	18
it is declared that	18
favours of the king	18
the names of the	18
by the heir of	18
the case of the	18
but it is not	18
therefore by the act	18
it is not the	18
that it is a	18
ought to have the	18
it cannot be denyed	18
and it is observable	18
heir of andrew anderson	18
it is observable from	18
he shall answer to	18
the lord of regality	18
the mercat cross of	18
the wives of the	18
the parliament of england	18
it would appear that	18
as we see in	18
and it is a	18
the right of succession	18
the soul of man	18
and in that case	18
be punishable by death	18
to be sent to	18
that the kings of	18
to the crown of	18
printed by the heir	18
the heir of andrew	18
and the protestant religion	18
it may be argued	18
this is the truth	18
by way of exception	18
be holden of the	18
as he shall answer	18
to belong to the	18
it is clear that	18
the younger sons of	18
that as to the	18
in either of these	18
not to be extended	18
the duke of monmouth	18
in the one case	18
in the case where	18
are punishable by death	18
it may be likewise	18
they should not be	17
and so could not	17
of fire and sword	17
and therefore it may	17
be made use of	17
the precedency due to	17
they ought to be	17
according to the civil	17
from the original text	17
the original text notes	17
one of the chief	17
yet by this act	17
where there is a	17
in the next place	17
an act of sederunt	17
the church of england	17
against the earl of	17
where it is said	17
and if they be	17
that there is no	17
how can it be	17
in the opinion of	17
by the authority of	17
opinion of the doctors	17
and if he be	17
of king iames the	17
he is to be	17
by vertue of this	17
if this were allowed	17
against the kings person	17
that they may be	17
that this act was	17
that such as are	17
it ought to be	17
be punished by the	17
if there be any	17
without an onerous cause	17
betwixt the king and	17
and i find that	17
text notes for div	17
and if it were	17
the prejudice of the	17
so far as it	17
is conform to the	17
was found to be	17
original text notes for	17
is due to the	17
in the kings will	17
is in it self	17
the antiquity of our	17
it may be also	16
it is not to	16
that there is nothing	16
is a kind of	16
to have the same	16
in the mean time	16
by the opinion of	16
offered to be proven	16
so far from being	16
if it be not	16
the case of a	16
the meaning of the	16
the king and parliament	16
and that he was	16
in the life of	16
yet it is not	16
to the king of	16
it may seem that	16
so much the more	16
in order to the	16
the time of this	16
that he is not	16
this it may be	16
it might have been	16
though it may seem	16
the person to whom	16
the death of the	16
can it be imagined	16
so it is that	16
by this act of	16
and that it is	16
of the law of	16
the oath of the	16
as is to be	16
by the hand of	16
and though it be	16
the ground of the	16
put to the knowledge	16
of the royal line	16
the greatest part of	16
of the kings of	16
the commission of the	16
on the act par	16
i find that the	15
this act is explained	15
upon the act par	15
i do not remember	15
the security of the	15
to the advantage of	15
by the act parl	15
either of these cases	15
not be extended to	15
yet there is no	15
burgh of the shire	15
in the matter of	15
the subjects of this	15
would not have been	15
yet i think that	15
cannot be taken away	15
and one of the	15
the value of the	15
the foresaid act of	15
to kirk and mercat	15
the right of blood	15
it is appointed that	15
the same with the	15
express act of parliament	15
clear by the act	15
to the law of	15
not to have been	15
the clerk of the	15
in the power of	15
and if there be	15
this act is in	15
to the late earl	15
for the advantage of	15
by the feudal law	15
from the french word	15
which is all that	15
he could not have	15
as the bishop of	15
he had not been	15
the children of the	15
to be found in	15
that they were not	15
to be proven by	15
the estates of parliament	15
and it seems that	15
is observable from this	15
officers of the crown	15
for it is not	15
by vertue of the	15
be preferred to him	15
to be the first	15
said to have been	15
it has been found	15
it is lawful to	14
words of this act	14
one and the same	14
to be punishable by	14
and it is probable	14
which could not be	14
could not but have	14
so far as the	14
the king of england	14
introduced in favours of	14
of the protestant religion	14
from which act it	14
if they had not	14
he ought to be	14
such as are not	14
nor is there any	14
narrative of this act	14
to this it may	14
in the act of	14
it seems that this	14
the end of the	14
the government of the	14
ought not to have	14
the case of treason	14
and therefore the lords	14
of the church of	14
in which it is	14
is so far from	14
vertue of this act	14
notwithstanding of this act	14
in arms against the	14
the earl of argyle	14
found not to be	14
and there is no	14
the commissioners of the	14
is there any thing	14
for the defence of	14
what is due to	14
that they would not	14
the kingdom of scotland	14
of this act is	14
it is not imaginable	14
the punishment of this	14
yet they are not	14
conform to this act	14
to which they are	14
and it was found	14
that it shall be	14
if he be not	14
it is also observable	14
of the books of	14
the opinion of all	14
that is due to	14
which it was replyed	14
by his majesties advocat	14
in the same manner	14
it may be debated	14
if a man should	14
there is nothing more	14
and that they should	14
to the opinion of	14
by the earl of	14
of the primitive church	14
in relation to the	14
go to the knowledge	14
at the desire of	14
to the end that	14
that he was a	14
should not be extended	14
if there be moe	14
yet it was found	14
granted by the king	14
it seems that the	14
to one of the	14
laws of the kingdom	14
of king robert the	14
it was alledged that	14
made in favours of	14
consistent with it self	14
and therefore by the	14
punishable by this act	14
who were to be	14
for that were to	14
the narrative of this	14
the fundamental laws of	14
and that by the	14
the committing of the	13
at the head burgh	13
it should not be	13
is explained in the	13
the arms of the	13
laws of other nations	13
succeeded to the crown	13
it will be fit	13
the design of this	13
from the time of	13
and the lords of	13
that they should not	13
by way of action	13
the master of the	13
the princes of the	13
it is clear by	13
in all time coming	13
in the beginning of	13
and yet it may	13
be in the kings	13
for payment of the	13
far as it is	13
a cheveron betwixt three	13
be said to have	13
the receiver of the	13
to give his oath	13
rising in arms against	13
which of the two	13
there is no reason	13
an act of the	13
because it was not	13
land in the west	13
and it is clear	13
which act it is	13
by this act likewise	13
as if it were	13
most part of the	13
the prince of orange	13
to the scots in	13
any thing that is	13
antiquity of the royal	13
mercat cross of edinburgh	13
the nobility and gentry	13
the money to be	13
to know that the	13
are declared to be	13
if any of the	13
consent of the three	13
and the laws of	13
thus the earl of	13
members of the colledge	13
judges competent to the	13
conform to the civil	13
and in this case	13
the second part of	13
this act does not	13
this act was made	13
and as it is	13
lawyers are of opinion	13
of his majesties advocat	13
the books of adjournal	13
act of the sess	13
not so much as	13
the term of payment	13
is the same with	13
this is the first	13
i find by the	13
are ordained to be	13
by the oath of	13
king james the first	13
and by the civil	13
was not able to	13
by way of justice	13
king james the third	13
the jurisdiction of the	13
i see no reason	13
in respect of the	13
he could not be	13
they ought to have	13
the face of the	13
it is hard to	13
if we consider the	13
is due to him	13
and though by the	13
is said to have	13
it were absurd to	13
that it is the	13
hold of the king	13
the command of the	13
to such as have	13
is by this act	13
it was not to	13
to the end they	13
that if a man	13
in this case the	13
to this it was	13
it would not be	12
and it is against	12
the first of the	12
is a part of	12
the pain of treason	12
that he was in	12
by the second act	12
is to be punished	12
the laws of all	12
act it is appointed	12
from the principles of	12
so far as he	12
it is also very	12
in the last age	12
in swa far as	12
it was found by	12
it may be known	12
in the canon law	12
on the tolbooth of	12
the act of annexation	12
but it seems that	12
after so long a	12
but to this it	12
this act appoints that	12
the members of the	12
act is in desuetude	12
of the bishop of	12
from the lords of	12
the civil law and	12
be punished with death	12
falls to the king	12
the same precedency that	12
to the kings of	12
rise in arms against	12
be registrated in the	12
i doubt not but	12
and in our law	12
and it cannot be	12
and part of the	12
the advantage of the	12
as if they had	12
for the most part	12
in the body of	12
of the name of	12
it is thought that	12
and thus it was	12
and the nature of	12
a part of his	12
to such as were	12
as the earl of	12
was found not to	12
it was found in	12
and yet it is	12
are said to be	12
that they shall not	12
nature of the thing	12
to go to the	12
conform to the common	12
the late act of	12
to be made in	12
and commissioners of justiciary	12
of the king and	12
is to be understood	12
the laws of other	12
should be extended to	12
that there could be	12
that the king of	12
to be punished with	12
by the first act	12
and that he had	12
that it was necessary	12
except in so far	12
i desire to know	12
the law of the	12
act is explained in	12
is to be observed	12
did not at all	12
the isle of britain	12
that no man can	12
that by the act	12
money to be sent	12
which is to be	12
if it were not	12
it is very probable	12
he will not be	12
part of the isle	12
to the date of	12
which is conform to	12
under the name of	12
where the crime was	12
made use of as	12
the king and the	12
are to be registrated	12
king charles the second	12
first part of the	12
that he should not	12
which was to be	12
right to the crown	12
the principles of reason	12
and that is the	12
of the privy council	12
the body of the	12
was found that the	12
it is not so	12
from which it may	11
the desire of the	11
that it has been	11
up and down the	11
and yet i think	11
his majesties most honourable	11
to the proximity of	11
to the value of	11
of the general assembly	11
may be also doubted	11
it is probable that	11
and the earl of	11
this act is only	11
and not from the	11
the time of his	11
are to be found	11
that the king is	11
as well as to	11
and yet i find	11
king iames the first	11
that it might be	11
and were it not	11
but it has been	11
a person who is	11
and that they were	11
be led in presence	11
shall be punished as	11
in prejudice of his	11
king iames the th	11
baillie of jerviswood traitor	11
to have been the	11
yet it does not	11
and in the case	11
it is not lawful	11
in the case betwixt	11
but if they be	11
they ought not to	11
the most part of	11
except in the case	11
will be preferred to	11
so could not be	11
far as concerns the	11
the payment of the	11
by this act is	11
most honourable privy council	11
to whom it was	11
this is to be	11
presence of the justices	11
be proven by witnesses	11
any part of his	11
for in that case	11
they would not be	11
our acts of parliament	11
of the eldest sons	11
he ought not to	11
in defraud of creditors	11
as art and part	11
charter granted by king	11
to be punished as	11
time of this act	11
can be taken away	11
the heirs of the	11
partaker of the fraud	11
and so it was	11
laws and customs of	11
will be fit to	11
a right to the	11
it were unjust that	11
which seems to be	11
the name of the	11
is to be found	11
of the place where	11
the second act of	11
with the earl of	11
many hundreds of years	11
because they could not	11
in spight of all	11
tryal and process of	11
in the atchievement of	11
as are guilty of	11
in the second place	11
a great part of	11
to the principles of	11
any thing to the	11
a lyon rampant gules	11
consent of the patron	11
according to the proximity	11
the tryal and process	11
it may seem strange	11
all such as have	11
though by the act	11
since by this act	11
preferred to him who	11
the nature of a	11
such as are guilty	11
i think that the	11
letters of fire and	11
from all which it	11
the people of england	11
not be able to	11
whereof the tenor follows	11
he ought to have	11
his most sacred majesty	11
to the end the	11
to the justice court	11
without the superiours consent	11
and it were very	11
and so should be	11
the thing it self	11
come in place of	11
of the parliament of	11
notwithstanding of all which	11
pleys of the crown	11
is offered to be	11
arms against the king	11
may be forced to	11
knowledge of an assize	11
one or other of	11
of the blood royal	11
the name of a	11
it was just that	11
the price of the	11
above the reach of	11
of the first parliament	11
and that there is	11
the church of rome	11
to his most sacred	11
as we call it	11
the hands of the	11
and process of high	11
of his majesties most	11
by vertue of a	11
to be done in	11
is art and part	11
it had not been	10
they had not been	10
the convention of estates	10
as if a man	10
robert baillie of ierviswood	10
is to be preferred	10
to them by the	10
is the same thing	10
with an imperial crown	10
the lords of council	10
holden of the superiour	10
by the help of	10
and albeit it may	10
act it is declared	10
but in my opinion	10
may be said to	10
of the lands of	10
to the end it	10
but i think that	10
by this act they	10
that it could not	10
that though by this	10
the daughter of a	10
for that is the	10
and if this be	10
because it is not	10
a letter to the	10
and the act of	10
act it is observable	10
to have been a	10
the advice of the	10
the use of the	10
there is nothing so	10
by his own authority	10
and it has been	10
my lords and gentlemen	10
is defined to be	10
the meaning of this	10
nothing can be answered	10
led in presence of	10
by their own authority	10
committing of the crime	10
of the house of	10
and i am sure	10
from the civil law	10
as it is consistent	10
the possession of the	10
is known to be	10
from the earl of	10
done to the prejudice	10
as in the other	10
for which they were	10
the crime of treason	10
so that it seems	10
the instance of a	10
it may be the	10
there should be no	10
the king could not	10
it is consistent with	10
printer to his most	10
on the other side	10
when any thing is	10
that they ought to	10
there is no mention	10
majesties most honourable privy	10
that he who is	10
they were to be	10
of the nearest of	10
which nothing can be	10
that he may be	10
as if one should	10
at the time when	10
the depositions of the	10
to punish such as	10
be sent to the	10
but such as are	10
the laws of nations	10
and there is nothing	10
so that if the	10
judges to the relevancy	10
the eldest son of	10
the account of the	10
of such as have	10
the crown of scotland	10
the king of spain	10
are judges competent to	10
may be punished for	10
be punished by death	10
in the same case	10
there any thing more	10
a man and his	10
but there is no	10
the laws and customs	10
when there is no	10
there is this difference	10
the reason inductive of	10
according to the several	10
yet it seems that	10
to the end he	10
from the nature of	10
does not at all	10
the practice of the	10
are to be seen	10
is the act par	10
and not of the	10
should be led in	10
and if we consider	10
of art and part	10
by the said act	10
that he was to	10
that albeit by the	10
in the isle of	10
and i am confident	10
have the same precedency	10
it is declared by	10
referred to his oath	10
may be proved by	10
and that they are	10
to come to the	10
by the parliament of	10
be pleased to consider	10
it seems to be	10
in the crime of	10
that it would not	10
to be put to	10
the knowledge of the	10
to land in the	10
seems to have been	10
and when they are	10
as was found the	10
a clock in the	10
is only in the	10
the civil law is	10
the will of the	10
for carrying on the	10
be found to be	10
good of the common	10
in prejudice of the	10
not being able to	10
the royal line of	10
though it was alledged	10
a person who was	10
to the quality of	10
wives of the eldest	10
him to be a	10
the scots in britain	10
with him in the	10
foresaid act of parliament	10
is committed against the	10
long before the year	10
as far as it	10
it should be lawful	10
the relevancy of the	10
to have been made	10
the discretion of the	10
about the time of	10
and since it is	10
subjects of this kingdom	10
laws of all nations	10
to be guilty of	10
the lords of secret	10
by the late act	10
it may be observed	10
opinion of all lawyers	10
it is treason to	10
this act to be	10
for the security of	10
the right of the	10
it was lawful to	10
and by the same	10
derive their power from	10
of the king of	10
an express act of	10
second part of this	10
the decreets of the	10
contrary to the nature	10
by how much the	10
as appears by the	10
in the earl of	10
in the nature of	10
with the protestant religion	10
a warrand from the	10
whereas it may be	10
for many hundreds of	10
should be in the	10
that the parliament of	10
issuing out of the	10
may it please your	10
act of the par	10
not only from the	10
from which it is	10
and that there were	10
king james the fifth	10
to be one of	10
the time of their	10
fall to the king	9
that they cannot be	9
of tarras and i	9
king robert the bruce	9
that the bishop of	9
it is founded upon	9
will have right to	9
from the scots and	9
opinion of the civilians	9
that they shall be	9
at the coronation of	9
point of treason is	9
yet it cannot be	9
a part of our	9
is only punishable by	9
act it is clear	9
be art and part	9
the lords of articles	9
are said to have	9
the giver of the	9
not only in the	9
which they are to	9
is clear from this	9
in the cases of	9
her contract of marriage	9
to the king and	9
that if he had	9
ought to be punished	9
be taken to the	9
may be likewise doubted	9
of council and session	9
since it is not	9
but cannot be positive	9
led within year and	9
contrary to this act	9
of his majesties officers	9
for understanding this act	9
to the cognition of	9
i have seen a	9
as far as he	9
of him who is	9
comprehended under the word	9
quartered in the second	9
it is by the	9
of the crown of	9
money to the late	9
and it would appear	9
in a case betwixt	9
as if they were	9
the several kinds of	9
the decreet of council	9
in the execution of	9
should not be made	9
earl of tarras and	9
person to whom the	9
and it is strange	9
before the privy council	9
by the principles of	9
only by way of	9
yet i see no	9
the reason why this	9
he is guilty of	9
that it was the	9
because by the act	9
as that they may	9
the lords would not	9
and according to the	9
he has right to	9
and so should not	9
though they were not	9
is ratified by the	9
an infeftment of annualrent	9
spoke to the deponent	9
the king and duke	9
our friends at london	9
it is in the	9
because they are not	9
the director of the	9
but in the other	9
by vertue of his	9
the rents of the	9
that the pannal did	9
the justices of peace	9
to be the same	9
the negligence of his	9
for the use of	9
if a person be	9
we will find that	9
and that it may	9
no more than a	9
that he should have	9
the other side of	9
act of the mind	9
by the narrative of	9
and the king of	9
that is to be	9
we see that the	9
in the night time	9
was to be sent	9
by and attour the	9
on a bend azur	9
in the justice court	9
and whereas it may	9
there is a god	9
going to kirk and	9
since they are not	9
be proved by presumptions	9
will be pleased to	9
because the law presumes	9
for so we call	9
and there is a	9
and acts of parliament	9
and that the king	9
at the sight of	9
the use of letters	9
the principles of the	9
of the act is	9
the case of one	9
confronted with the pannal	9
king james the fourth	9
or any thing else	9
do not remember he	9
the best of men	9
countrey party in england	9
because they were not	9
one thousand six hundred	9
and therefore since the	9
in the last place	9
and not to be	9
and it were absurd	9
as may be seen	9
to have been in	9
of the christian religion	9
the cognition of the	9
to be punishable as	9
was put to the	9
who are to be	9
and albeit it be	9
as one of the	9
are art and part	9
is the interest of	9
in the same condition	9
what is to be	9
the third of the	9
and though it was	9
to kill the king	9
but in this case	9
lords of the secret	9
their lives and fortunes	9
where the crime is	9
then we call them	9
in the council of	9
and as i remember	9
the power of making	9
to him who was	9
it shall not be	9
but on the other	9
the honour of the	9
the foundation of the	9
and it were hard	9
the time when the	9
be the foundation of	9
in the parliament of	9
it is impossible to	9
his highness the prince	9
the parliament of scotland	9
the cour des aides	9
within the bounds of	9
as if it had	9
and whereas it was	9
is in our law	9
from this act it	9
betwixt the bruce and	9
upon the same reason	9
it is the interest	9
with consent of the	9
the person who was	9
that the scots and	9
that the king has	9
but i find that	9
he is not obliged	9
nor can i see	9
the heads of the	9
the first act of	9
on a chief azur	9
according to our law	9
a charter granted by	9
of tarras and me	9
in his own defence	9
with the late earl	9
the advantage of church	9
the prejudice of his	9
that he does not	9
the quality of the	9
it may be concluded	9
as the deponent remembers	9
the laws of nature	9
royal line of scotland	9
in a letter to	9
which is the chief	9
if a man be	9
and that he is	9
contrary to the libel	9
that one of the	9
as if he would	9
that ferguson told him	9
the person of the	9
according to the date	9
it is likewise observable	9
it is one of	9
were not to be	9
for the space of	9
to be done by	9
of the acts of	9
as much of the	9
whereby it is declared	9
of the younger sons	9
is appointed to be	9
king james the second	9
the order of the	9
conceived in favours of	9
according to the law	9
be found in the	9
hilted and pomelled or	9
aptara keyed and coded	9
use of as a	9
it is a principle	9
against a singular successor	9
of those who are	9
by the consent of	9
the countrey party in	9
before the term of	9
up several nights with	9
the justices are only	9
were not able to	9
princes of the blood	9
and whatever may be	9
and law of nations	9
but if it be	9
it be imagined that	9
to have been done	9
and by our law	9
such as were not	9
ferguson told the deponent	9
and so cannot be	9
to which my answer	9
is clear from the	9
as well as in	9
in his power to	9
in imitation of the	8
seems to be a	8
there was but one	8
and ye will find	8
by this act no	8
is declared by the	8
in neither of these	8
design of this act	8
but this is not	8
he the said baillie	8
at the end of	8
acts of parliament are	8
but i do not	8
and so may be	8
appointed by this act	8
in the former act	8
so neither can the	8
came to the crown	8
upon the ground of	8
it were hard that	8
to be observed in	8
abrogated by the act	8
that it cannot be	8
and is it not	8
it is pretended that	8
and so it is	8
there be any thing	8
authority of the three	8
acts of this parliament	8
not to have the	8
not punishable by death	8
it is not sufficient	8
in whose favours the	8
the number of the	8
it does not follow	8
it is sufficient to	8
the same manner as	8
i have set down	8
the very nature of	8
year and day of	8
is fit to observe	8
to the laird of	8
they are said to	8
this clause of the	8
the day of the	8
and that he did	8
should belong to the	8
but it would appear	8
is clear that the	8
that this right of	8
if there be a	8
be extended to such	8
according to the quality	8
be doubted whether this	8
may be the better	8
is not sufficient to	8
had right to the	8
which it is clear	8
to be founded upon	8
it is not probable	8
upon the deposition of	8
the beginning of the	8
in as far as	8
out of the kingdom	8
made in defraud of	8
eldest son and heir	8
cannot be extended to	8
not to be punished	8
can it be denyed	8
succeeding to the crown	8
far as they are	8
their power from the	8
covantage keyed and coded	8
for longer space than	8
and it would be	8
doom of forfaulture against	8
place where the crime	8
it is a general	8
several acts of parliament	8
of the deponent his	8
is not oblieged to	8
that the reason why	8
explained in the act	8
the deponent that he	8
if it had not	8
by way of incursion	8
against the laird of	8
the registers of council	8
is declared that the	8
and though this be	8
it is very well	8
but because this act	8
which my answer is	8
that we were setled	8
the atchievement of the	8
be lyable to the	8
man and his heirs	8
and it is the	8
in the general register	8
to take notice of	8
the benefit of a	8
late act of parliament	8
the people of scotland	8
the same reason it	8
to the king by	8
that there shall be	8
the behove of the	8
is an act of	8
to pay the debt	8
par in parem non	8
of the greatest importance	8
is appointed that the	8
act of parliament is	8
is extended to all	8
albeit there be no	8
in this case it	8
the top of the	8
ought to have been	8
that no man should	8
that he would not	8
out of the books	8
all which it is	8
or other of the	8
due to the superiour	8
the first parliament of	8
by this act that	8
by an arbitrary punishment	8
the consent of his	8
and the town of	8
ad futuram rei memoriam	8
that it should not	8
only judges competent to	8
should not be punished	8
by the title of	8
by the same rule	8
in any of the	8
he should have been	8
the glory of god	8
the king of the	8
comprehended under the general	8
depones that the pannal	8
for the better understanding	8
a matter of fact	8
no part of the	8
is not extended to	8
it is very remarkable	8
to take away the	8
that this was the	8
of the church and	8
year of his reign	8
the king of france	8
ground of the lands	8
such as are in	8
so far as to	8
be a sufficient ground	8
there must be a	8
as in other cases	8
the instance of his	8
it is not presumeable	8
be forced to depon	8
this act had been	8
administration of the government	8
in the right of	8
the end they may	8
by which they are	8
and when they were	8
and therefore i think	8
should be lyable to	8
and there can be	8
and to the end	8
alledged to have been	8
the reason why they	8
which is committed against	8
of one of the	8
judith siefring sampled and	8
during the time of	8
in the persons of	8
in the face of	8
the occasion of the	8
and doom of forfaulture	8
to a third of	8
in the registers of	8
nor can there be	8
it was to be	8
in my first book	8
and that it should	8
when a man is	8
that the civil law	8
and the bishop of	8
is called by the	8
of the first marriage	8
day of the week	8
by act of council	8
of the duke of	8
that the act of	8
out of which they	8
and xml conversion a	8
the only way to	8
and the best of	8
and we see that	8
by an express statute	8
and are to be	8
not be allowed to	8
every thing that is	8
that this was not	8
they could not have	8
albeit it was alledged	8
this act is fully	8
or it may be	8
in the midst of	8
earl of argile was	8
could not be a	8
to which is added	8
be extended to the	8
be punished as a	8
but in that case	8
it as far as	8
not be lyable to	8
the sight of the	8
offered to be proved	8
genealogy of our kings	8
to be understood of	8
in the former case	8
is abrogated by the	8
bear the arms of	8
the precedency from the	8
the proximity of blood	8
that which is committed	8
never be able to	8
annexed to the crown	8
that it was talked	8
if it were otherwise	8
this act it be	8
all that can be	8
i have my self	8
he should not be	8
be received a witness	8
far as it was	8
the eyes of the	8
it is very clear	8
as to his life	8
senators of the colledge	8
for rising in arms	8
according to the laws	8
is to be taken	8
it could have been	8
this act the king	8
the town of edinburgh	8
judith siefring text and	8
the execution of the	8
since the act of	8
without taking notice of	8
come in pari passu	8
in that case they	8
by a special statute	8
be put to execution	8
to be taken up	8
and yet if the	8
it is said to	8
that by the same	8
that a man should	8
of the feudal law	8
and this seems to	8
and on the other	8
to find caution to	8
that there was not	8
the law it self	8
it may be here	8
belongs to the king	8
who is to be	8
in answer to the	8
but i think the	8
in the terms of	8
is ordained to be	8
and how can it	8
the acts of the	8
in it self a	8
in favours of a	8
succession to the crown	8
act here related to	8
it is presumable that	8
it would have been	8
by the three estates	8
and when it is	8
the act here related	8
a long tract of	8
session of his majesties	8
them when they are	8
as if he were	8
this act appoints all	8
the officers of the	8
to which nothing can	8
by the privy council	8
it may be urged	8
not be made use	8
all such as are	8
siefring text and markup	8
and the reason is	8
depositions of the witnesses	8
and by the law	8
in the succession of	8
though he was not	8
this is but a	8
by way of grace	8
the civil law did	8
is not only a	8
but yet it is	8
treason and doom of	8
because he could not	8
and that which is	8
and i have seen	8
by the scots and	8
to defend against the	8
this act appoints the	8
such as are the	8
the institutions of the	8
that he will not	8
is to be presumed	8
and not according to	8
that he had no	8
were absurd to think	8
it was decided in	8
and such a day	8
the punishment of death	8
from the law of	8
meaning of this act	8
to be registrated in	8
as in this case	8
to have the precedency	8
which is the only	8
to be taken by	8
siefring sampled and proofread	8
it is just that	8
the books of sederunt	8
to commit a crime	8
in the arms of	8
probation should be led	8
and if they had	8
to be free from	8
an account of the	8
is consistent with it	8
by the roman law	8
and this act was	8
this it was answered	8
the form of the	8
be pursued before the	8
though it would seem	8
to be lyable for	8
and that not only	8
the defence of the	8
will be allowed to	8
it is appointed by	8
for no man can	8
that in this case	8
and not by the	8
that sir john cochran	8
to the said earl	8
king robert the first	8
to be proved by	8
at which time the	8
apex covantage keyed and	8
of forfaulture against mr	8
and not revealing the	7
according to their creation	7
the whole tract of	7
but yet i think	7
is contrary to the	7
the earl of forths	7
which might have been	7
the truth of the	7
be guilty of treason	7
right to the whole	7
all the parts of	7
and what can be	7
to be of the	7
in use with us	7
and therefore it seems	7
this and many other	7
the terms of the	7
restored by way of	7
they were in possession	7
and though there be	7
which is the same	7
but such as have	7
at that time to	7
the express words of	7
be founded upon the	7
take the oath of	7
to the power of	7
and their heirs male	7
be out of the	7
that we have no	7
so that it is	7
a lord of regality	7
to which the doctor	7
the council of trent	7
in the moneth of	7
in his own house	7
that it shall not	7
by this act there	7
it is most certain	7
that could not be	7
to the affairs of	7
the case where the	7
of the royal family	7
not from the date	7
at the kings instance	7
to which they were	7
a person of quality	7
that the countrey was	7
if the appearand heir	7
to the tryal of	7
in this act is	7
there is no such	7
as far as the	7
the patrimony of the	7
the author of the	7
not only to the	7
and these who are	7
the register and advocat	7
though it be pretended	7
the granter of the	7
well as the other	7
though it was not	7
a letter from his	7
are only judges competent	7
when he was in	7
that if they be	7
it was thought that	7
upon the day of	7
cannot be a witness	7
to be put in	7
whereas on the other	7
this act they are	7
the expence of the	7
the several degrees of	7
and therefore if the	7
it would seem by	7
a general rule in	7
the senators of the	7
presence of the assize	7
in a capacity to	7
power of pit and	7
their power from god	7
that some of the	7
a committee of parliament	7
of king edward the	7
holds not only in	7
be punishable by this	7
the king by his	7
declared to belong to	7
to be in desuetude	7
to have right to	7
which is founded upon	7
to underly the law	7
a chief of the	7
committed against the law	7
the disposition made to	7
that there may be	7
by way of reduction	7
and as this is	7
of king james the	7
it may be objected	7
it is that the	7
i hope ye will	7
the foundation of a	7
see no reason why	7
not to be respected	7
in the first part	7
the head of the	7
he was to be	7
his life and fortune	7
by a publick law	7
observations on the act	7
partakers of the fraud	7
as well as their	7
and it is to	7
which i have cited	7
even to such as	7
it is declared lawful	7
he was found guilty	7
made by king james	7
a part of a	7
but now by the	7
of the difference betwixt	7
to whom it is	7
one of the witnesses	7
is very clear by	7
of argile was to	7
be doubted whether the	7
and in place of	7
where it was found	7
if the king were	7
would be able to	7
no more then that	7
that he was not	7
not only to be	7
is guilty of the	7
it is not just	7
of the common law	7
and it were most	7
of horse and dragoons	7
it were against the	7
very clear by the	7
the law presumes that	7
pursued by way of	7
be admitted to be	7
to fergus the first	7
committed against the kings	7
princes of the empire	7
and that for the	7
part of the shield	7
is observable that the	7
and this is that	7
in favours of his	7
it was likewise found	7
the person in whose	7
put to the horn	7
found by the lords	7
in the way of	7
lords of council and	7
but it is fit	7
if it can be	7
no more to be	7
by the same argument	7
the cause of god	7
of the second marriage	7
from god almighty alone	7
upon the act of	7
of the justices and	7
and with us the	7
to the first of	7
as an enemy to	7
the scripture tells us	7
that the law should	7
for payment of a	7
that by that act	7
the state of the	7
no more than the	7
in our acts of	7
not so much to	7
that they should have	7
how is it imaginable	7
three flowers de lis	7
of the decreet of	7
it is most observable	7
wives of the younger	7
by our law to	7
the best of kings	7
his majesties officers of	7
is a general rule	7
but not in the	7
be the same with	7
at the discretion of	7
according to the old	7
the council uses to	7
that he is the	7
see not why the	7
are preferred to all	7
reason why they are	7
who was the first	7
there would be no	7
of the justice court	7
lords of secret council	7
that the power of	7
to the behove of	7
by the th act	7
and who was the	7
writers to the signet	7
here before the year	7
the same parity of	7
heir of the crown	7
reign of king charles	7
it cannot be imagined	7
as they thought fit	7
are now in desuetude	7
of the kingdom of	7
it appears that the	7
and such as were	7
to a third party	7
sir george mackenzie of	7
what was done in	7
if this had been	7
and the other a	7
the great design of	7
by one of the	7
and though by this	7
that he might have	7
no act of parliament	7
of church and state	7
clause of the act	7
that this must be	7
with relation to the	7
valid against singular successors	7
that the same was	7
by the former act	7
chief of the second	7
he would have been	7
but this act is	7
to think that they	7
not able to pay	7
an act of council	7
may be alledged that	7
that it would be	7
is very well known	7
the sense of the	7
was to be expected	7
against such as are	7
and this act is	7
they would not have	7
late earl of argiles	7
that the scots did	7
in his majesties name	7
to be judged by	7
for payment of their	7
a man to be	7
act of the first	7
yet by our law	7
to be free of	7
to the right of	7
his majesties advocat in	7
but it was found	7
being a part of	7
the common opinion of	7
to invite men to	7
so that if he	7
contra the earl of	7
a part of it	7
upon the death of	7
that this act is	7
is a french word	7
but that it is	7
as much as the	7
that he might be	7
if he would have	7
not to be thought	7
to be art and	7
any of the royal	7
and who should be	7
the law doth not	7
yet he is not	7
is by the act	7
was said to be	7
the assertion of the	7
to the abbacy of	7
in matters of government	7
that in the case	7
betwixt and such a	7
for those who were	7
precedency that is due	7
that the negligence of	7
for it cannot be	7
one of the great	7
that the reason of	7
to be taken to	7
and who would not	7
and after he had	7
in the place where	7
that the late earl	7
is much to be	7
there is not a	7
that they will not	7
majesties officers of state	7
the negligence of the	7
the bp of st	7
should be allowed to	7
be proven by the	7
and the opinion of	7
not be taken away	7
that palladius was sent	7
that it is treason	7
the place where they	7
but though this act	7
though we have no	7
only such as are	7
of all the three	7
because he was not	7
spi global keyed and	7
the design of killing	7
they are in the	7
that there are some	7
of the members of	7