trigram

This is a table of type trigram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.

trigram	frequency
by this act	756
it may be	581
by the act	425
the civil law	364
and it is	364
is to be	358
the act par	338
act of parliament	325
the earl of	306
according to the	305
the lords of	291
such as are	282
are to be	281
not to be	276
as to the	271
part of the	271
and by the	269
could not be	261
as well as	259
and that the	243
this act is	241
it is not	236
in the case	230
that it is	226
to have been	225
one of the	214
in this case	214
there is no	212
the act of	201
that it was	201
in favours of	201
in that case	201
to the king	197
to be a	195
the law of	192
the case of	191
should not be	186
may be doubted	176
ought to be	173
the time of	173
that is to	171
to be the	170
of this act	167
that he was	167
by the civil	164
which is the	162
out of the	162
and this is	162
of the act	161
is to say	160
of his majesties	146
the name of	145
lords of session	144
the nature of	144
and in the	144
that if the	144
of the first	142
and if the	141
it is answered	140
so it is	139
acts of parliament	139
but it is	138
by our law	138
by way of	137
in our law	136
as in the	136
in the same	135
is clear by	134
of their own	133
if they be	132
and that he	131
that they were	129
but if the	129
the laws of	129
and therefore the	128
a part of	126
of all the	126
the power of	125
there is a	125
so far as	125
that the king	124
in so far	123
was to be	122
the bishop of	122
right to the	121
yet it is	121
early english books	120
and the other	120
they are not	120
the reason of	119
to which it	119
as is clear	119
might have been	117
it was found	117
the common law	117
to the crown	116
that they are	115
by the law	115
if he had	115
in the act	114
as it is	113
and therefore it	113
it cannot be	113
of the same	113
were to be	113
of the king	112
if it be	112
and though the	112
his majesties advocat	112
this act the	112
the king of	111
said to be	111
and so the	111
they could not	110
bishop of st	110
and that it	110
the punishment of	109
because of the	109
it is a	107
act it is	107
of his own	107
the consent of	107
art and part	107
because it is	106
when they are	106
consent of the	105
which it is	105
it is fit	104
and it was	104
it is observable	104
it was not	103
the king and	103
only to be	102
this act it	102
of the kings	101
that he is	101
to the end	101
and if he	101
punishable by death	101
to such as	100
seems to be	99
but so it	99
an act of	99
it is declared	99
he could not	98
such as have	98
as for instance	97
the same reason	97
that they should	96
in place of	96
and that they	96
in this act	96
english books online	96
that there is	95
if there be	95
favours of the	95
and the reason	95
to be punished	95
that by the	95
they were not	94
it should be	94
though it be	94
the reason why	93
of the session	93
that this act	93
though this act	93
is fit to	93
act of the	93
of the kingdom	92
the design of	92
any of the	92
as was found	91
it is said	91
of such as	90
it has been	90
the instance of	89
for the same	89
so that the	89
by the same	89
by the king	89
in the first	89
which it was	88
time of the	88
ought not to	88
it seems that	88
or at least	88
they may be	87
that he had	87
there was a	87
by vertue of	86
the kings of	86
that there was	86
conform to the	86
of the said	86
for it is	86
such as were	85
because they are	85
and not to	85
it is to	85
it is very	85
the opinion of	84
but by the	84
it is clear	84
in his own	83
could not have	83
the right of	83
at the instance	83
king james the	83
of the church	83
the canon law	82
that he should	82
had not been	82
it is the	81
of the nation	81
the pain of	80
clear by the	80
if they had	80
his eldest son	80
and such as	80
and if they	80
of the crown	79
it is most	79
at that time	79
though it was	79
nature of the	78
that which is	78
be preferred to	78
in it self	78
he is not	77
it must be	77
of the law	76
this is the	75
this act of	75
lords of the	75
be extended to	74
that they may	74
and as to	74
and all the	74
of our kings	74
the knowledge of	74
king iames the	73
to this it	73
where there is	73
and it were	73
can it be	73
and to the	72
if a man	72
the protestant religion	72
based on the	72
of the common	72
text creation partnership	72
that in the	72
to have the	71
should have been	71
of the second	71
i find that	71
to be preferred	71
if he be	71
they should be	71
that the scots	70
these who are	70
that such as	69
in presence of	69
in such cases	69
declared to be	69
is not to	69
or any other	69
and though it	69
if they were	69
the duke of	69
this act was	69
it would be	69
there was no	68
for their own	68
it had been	68
at the time	68
by the lords	68
the scots and	68
all such as	67
and of the	67
will not be	67
fit to know	67
was found in	67
when he was	67
if it were	67
in all the	67
founded upon the	67
from this act	66
is said to	66
but that the	66
as if he	66
by that act	66
is founded upon	66
which is a	66
that the said	66
and thus the	66
of the people	65
by the common	65
and yet the	65
the privy council	65
that he who	65
in the other	65
earl of argile	65
to be made	64
due to the	64
in order to	64
from the king	64
the parliament of	64
ought to have	64
earl of tarras	64
the acts of	64
made by the	63
contrary to the	63
to his own	63
would not have	63
by act of	63
to be in	63
those who are	63
as said is	62
though they be	62
belong to the	62
he who is	62
no man can	62
in the year	61
the arms of	61
the interest of	61
for the future	61
of the lords	61
and which is	61
the books of	60
scots and picts	60
the date of	60
officers of state	60
that the parliament	60
there can be	60
they are to	60
to his majesty	60
but this is	60
to which the	60
be said to	59
before the lords	59
to whom the	59
where it is	59
shall not be	59
have right to	59
the best of	59
would not be	59
that he might	59
the first of	59
and if it	59
some of the	59
against the king	58
that we were	58
in prejudice of	58
not able to	58
he may be	58
those who were	58
the lords found	57
the matter of	57
words of the	57
sir george mackenzie	57
of the crime	57
and it may	56
it to be	56
this act appoints	56
upon this act	56
to be done	56
found in the	56
that though the	56
the other hand	56
to all the	56
it was answered	56
they be not	56
because it was	56
for payment of	56
if this were	55
under the pain	55
it could not	55
the use of	55
the three estates	55
that can be	55
they would not	55
there be no	55
since it is	55
which they are	55
to the prejudice	55
year and day	55
the death of	55
is due to	55
in the kings	55
be able to	55
when they were	55
of this parliament	55
not at all	54
could have been	54
an onerous cause	54
and for the	54
by the parliament	54
it is appointed	54
the late earl	54
late earl of	54
before the year	54
and therefore i	54
can be no	54
i think that	54
to the kings	54
would have been	54
presence of the	54
that he may	54
and if this	53
yet it was	53
not have been	53
to the knowledge	53
and by this	53
which is not	53
the principles of	53
is by the	53
yet they are	53
it would appear	53
to be so	53
to think that	53
that the lords	53
the reign of	52
king robert the	52
the prejudice of	52
it was alledged	52
and in this	52
not only to	52
the authority of	52
because they were	52
upon the same	52
on the other	52
it may seem	52
to be seen	52
to the first	51
granted by the	51
for that effect	51
he had not	51
them to be	51
when it is	51
if it had	51
there is nothing	51
that they would	51
that no man	51
he might have	51
the antiquity of	51
and to be	51
that it should	51
to the same	51
and it seems	50
that part of	50
by the foresaid	50
that he could	50
for div a	50
whereas it is	50
he had been	50
as much as	50
in the former	50
though by this	50
and albeit the	50
yet i think	50
notes for div	50
in the one	50
by their own	50
king of scotland	50
that by this	50
to the lords	50
but it may	50
that the law	49
and yet i	49
by the name	49
that if a	49
it would seem	49
any part of	49
are not to	49
to pay the	49
according to their	49
of the whole	49
of what is	49
to go to	49
by the canon	49
he was not	49
and there is	49
that there were	49
knowledge of an	49
in all cases	48
as if the	48
in which case	48
that they might	48
by the laws	48
the king may	48
to this act	48
that he would	48
to be his	48
because of their	48
a person who	48
this it is	48
by his own	48
well as the	48
marked as illegible	48
and so it	48
in other cases	48
king charles the	48
represented either as	48
of the lands	48
payment of the	48
characters represented either	48
to make the	48
but i think	48
of all nations	48
keying and markup	48
he was to	48
interest of the	48
either as utf	48
the names of	48
in which the	48
and i find	48
and as the	48
the same to	48
could not but	48
is in desuetude	48
which they were	48
to be taken	48
therefore it is	48
said to have	48
as they are	47
in time of	47
and they are	47
be punished by	47
of the world	47
the title of	47
it is also	47
of those who	47
to the said	47
in the civil	47
and yet it	47
which may be	47
that the earl	47
at the same	47
as far as	47
that he did	46
is not only	46
could be no	46
by the justices	46
the king is	46
place of the	46
that this was	46
which cannot be	46
of the former	46
law of nations	46
they had been	46
yet by the	46
they ought to	46
the justice court	46
the execution of	46
of the scots	46
and this was	46
one of these	45
of that ilk	45
is in the	45
is but a	45
by the first	45
nearest of kin	45
so that it	45
except they be	45
that all the	45
the laird of	45
judges competent to	45
to be extended	45
it be not	45
robert baillie of	45
of the three	45
the advantage of	45
told the deponent	45
the want of	44
him to be	44
matter of fact	44
be in the	44
be taken away	44
to be found	44
though it may	44
he did not	44
the way of	44
but in the	44
may be punished	44
may not be	44
found to be	44
and this act	44
that the same	44
by sir george	44
yet if the	44
which was the	44
that of the	44
that they have	43
be allowed to	43
the act sess	43
is the same	43
of the royal	43
of the parliament	43
and that this	43
is given to	43
law of nature	43
part of his	43
either of these	43
in the last	43
it is probable	43
that his majesty	43
nor can it	43
opinion of the	43
be punished as	43
he should be	43
and upon the	43
at any time	43
the said mr	43
the depositions of	43
of such a	43
if the king	43
in matters of	43
of this kingdom	43
the wives of	43
that in all	43
that it may	42
fergus the second	42
preferred to the	42
is only to	42
by his majesties	42
it is likewise	42
to the common	42
he is to	42
this is not	42
the house of	42
because he was	42
the crown of	42
the same time	42
this is a	42
the kingdom of	42
against such as	42
the words of	42
in case of	42
such as the	41
in the world	41
it is only	41
except it be	41
and with us	41
as if they	41
the terms of	41
there could be	41
date of the	41
without the consent	41
and whereas it	41
by such as	41
is not so	41
the priviledge of	41
he would have	41
before that time	41
or if the	41
and that there	41
have the same	41
in these cases	41
i have seen	41
and since the	41
not so much	41
it might be	41
the same with	41
by the council	41
so much the	41
to which they	40
and that by	40
they cannot be	40
not to the	40
though they were	40
of an inquest	40
but yet the	40
of the other	40
and not the	40
to the earl	40
to the civil	40
the crime of	40
that the kings	40
the number of	40
and the law	40
if there was	40
laws of the	40
it will be	40
of all others	40
not to have	40
he ought to	40
in the time	40
as it was	39
therefore by the	39
that they had	39
to know that	39
the coat of	39
was found that	39
they might have	39
that they could	39
them in the	39
to this day	39
to their own	39
there are some	39
and that is	39
that the people	39
of the government	39
rise in arms	39
but on the	39
we will find	39
robert the d	39
a lyon rampant	39
that a man	39
but if they	39
that they shall	39
by the said	39
letters of horning	39
the foresaid act	39
i know that	39
to be an	39
the son of	39
by an act	39
the occasion of	38
granted to the	38
before the justices	38
the heir of	38
as to this	38
on act par	38
was the first	38
that these who	38
of the party	38
sir john cochran	38
and therefore by	38
that if he	38
can only be	38
nor is it	38
any of his	38
not only in	38
by which it	38
that if any	38
act of this	38
a power to	38
notwithstanding of the	38
not only the	38
of this crime	38
so that if	38
though by the	38
day of the	37
right of succession	37
though there be	37
we see that	37
law of god	37
at which time	37
by the doctors	37
is one of	37
and when they	37
in their own	37
of the civil	37
and i have	37
and from this	37
made use of	37
the church of	37
the truth of	37
the life of	37
to do so	37
cannot be said	37
of the countrey	37
the same way	37
it is that	37
and if we	37
reason of this	37
only in the	37
the said act	37
be proven by	37
as not to	37
found that the	37
colledge of justice	36
the punishment is	36
reason of the	36
be guilty of	36
is obliged to	36
the fear of	36
be proved by	36
the hands of	36
from the people	36
they will be	36
the hand of	36
who are not	36
given to the	36
his majesties privy	36
the colledge of	36
of the great	36
rising in arms	36
the oath of	36
that is the	36
to find caution	36
any of these	36
it shall be	36
of other nations	36
design of the	36
be seen in	36
because he is	36
but such as	36
and though this	36
and therefore they	36
the place where	36
to which he	36
there are many	36
and the same	36
it is statute	36
to his majesties	36
the appearand heir	36
the person who	35
act of sederunt	35
the foundation of	35
belonging to the	35
the crime is	35
and when the	35
whereby it is	35
of the process	35
that there are	35
they must be	35
the feudal law	35
since the act	35
be punishable by	35
go to the	35
and part of	35
and if any	35
majesties privy council	35
but that he	35
the process of	35
the meaning of	35
in my opinion	35
to the justices	35
which i have	35
the good of	35
yet it may	35
of him who	35
instance of the	35
baillie of jerviswood	35
and in all	35
the kings advocat	35
a kind of	35
or if he	35
the children of	35
and these are	35
them to the	35
and the act	35
can never be	35
to the other	34
if we consider	34
a right to	34
of the witnesses	34
yet the lords	34
the officers of	34
they would have	34
they are in	34
given by the	34
of the greatest	34
the town of	34
so great a	34
behoved to be	34
so much as	34
the value of	34
and all other	34
competent to the	34
in the next	34
king of the	34
which he had	34
before the council	34
to be holden	34
to the second	34
is not the	34
in the second	34
within year and	34
to him by	34
that our kings	34
this act all	34
may be answered	33
that it were	33
is now in	33
to the council	33
it is in	33
one of his	33
only to the	33
now in desuetude	33
account of the	33
of all other	33
mentioned in the	33
ordained to be	33
and so he	33
to whom he	33
if a person	33
by a special	33
he will be	33
by that law	33
an arbitrary punishment	33
the practice of	33
the former act	33
as if a	33
this part of	33
and in that	33
may be likewise	33
not in the	33
albeit it was	33
may be alledged	33
to make them	33
of the two	33
which he was	33
and how can	33
be lyable to	33
think that the	33
done by the	33
known to be	33
after he had	33
are in the	33
of the council	33
are by this	33
be doubted whether	33
to be sent	33
of the land	33
to be observed	33
is a great	33
they were to	32
i think it	32
and the king	32
from which it	32
to be proven	32
and i think	32
upon the act	32
of the saids	32
due to him	32
is punishable by	32
of the colledge	32
the same precedency	32
which did not	32
lords of erection	32
these who were	32
he was in	32
by his majesty	32
as if it	32
to be punishable	32
may be pursued	32
by which the	32
it to the	32
the rest of	32
taken away by	32
i conceive that	32
that this is	32
a man to	32
prior to the	32
i see not	32
they had not	32
the nearest of	32
by the english	32
which is called	32
the crime was	32
the same thing	32
so far from	32
in his majesties	32
were sent to	32
in the parliament	32
the most part	32
of the shire	32
that if they	32
returned to the	31
of our own	31
is not sufficient	31
come to the	31
there may be	31
that those who	31
it is more	31
that such a	31
in the general	31
the decreet of	31
but though this	31
to secure the	31
and many other	31
but not to	31
that not only	31
so that he	31
this act to	31
is the first	31
we have no	31
by the kings	31
to be registrated	31
is called the	31
it were hard	31
which they had	31
up to a	31
on a chief	31
guilty of treason	31
if he were	31
to be null	31
shall be punished	31
it does not	31
the end of	31
at the mercat	31
and i am	31
observations upon the	31
the honour of	31
act of council	31
upon that account	31
and so they	31
they did not	31
not obliged to	31
since they are	31
a man should	31
in some cases	31
which are the	31
of the thing	31
in civil cases	31
to be considered	31
to the party	31
against the kings	31
and they were	30
to him who	30
of the prince	30
the great seal	30
of the justices	30
presumed to be	30
and then the	30
in criminal cases	30
by which they	30
to the superiour	30
is very clear	30
yet i find	30
kings of scotland	30
before this act	30
as we see	30
that the person	30
can be made	30
within a double	30
the price of	30
the account of	30
has right to	30
a double tressure	30
that in this	30
law of england	30
prejudice of the	30
to prove the	30
their own nature	30
upon his own	30
are of opinion	30
there being no	30
for his own	30
a number of	30
for which they	30
i think the	30
of tarras and	30
who was the	30
who would not	30
to belong to	30
the custom of	30
lyable to the	30
him by the	30
from the date	30
the commission of	30
to prove that	30
it is pretended	30
that it would	30
of what they	30
but yet i	30
to the law	30
and albeit it	30
out of his	30
where there are	30
to the parliament	30
he will not	30
is able to	30
and as it	30
be forced to	30
the scots were	30
that we have	30
is clear from	30
they should not	30
the benefit of	30
in the said	30
for the first	30
of the family	30
the half of	30
as i have	29
had right to	29
he would not	29
not from the	29
of these who	29
it was a	29
in such a	29
the first is	29
and one of	29
but this was	29
are punishable by	29
case of the	29
and it would	29
of the shield	29
of the chief	29
two or three	29
upon the account	29
to have a	29
albeit by the	29
of the earl	29
is there any	29
the payment of	29
of the person	29
relation to the	29
that the pursuer	29
suitable to the	29
half of the	29
the king or	29
even in the	29
with the coat	29
that he will	29
the necessity of	29
all the other	29
the ground of	29
as to which	29
and so is	29
as to all	29
these acts are	29
for the good	29
albeit it be	29
the difference betwixt	29
put to the	29
in arms against	29
of that act	29
in all other	29
the king has	29
if any of	29
they will not	29
this is called	29
and that in	29
power of the	29
and that we	29
a decreet of	29
therefore it was	29
and yet in	29
the hazard of	29
the body of	29
but with us	29
but that they	28
that were to	28
therefore by this	28
be admitted to	28
there be a	28
is not a	28
reason why the	28
and that because	28
on a bend	28
but yet it	28
to be given	28
for by the	28
thought fit to	28
it is now	28
may be the	28
the deposition of	28
and thus it	28
copies of the	28
of the most	28
is declared to	28
should be in	28
and his heirs	28
as this is	28
members of the	28
and to have	28
as it were	28
for if the	28
was found to	28
for the king	28
a letter to	28
him in the	28
the heirs of	28
far as it	28
as he pleases	28
and not by	28
was in the	28
and the lords	28
are guilty of	28
to the deponent	28
have been in	28
he cannot be	28
part of this	28
in which they	28
in spight of	28
with us the	28
he must be	28
king and his	28
as to these	28
when he is	28
by the people	28
it should not	28
should be punished	28
nor can the	28
he was a	28
and these who	28
i am confident	28
out of which	28
yet there is	27
and he who	27
this seems to	27
be put to	27
to be their	27
that he cannot	27
for that is	27
are only to	27
it hath been	27
the day of	27
to those who	27
the people of	27
the command of	27
are said to	27
that is not	27
the lands of	27
but i find	27
the christian religion	27
all that is	27
and so should	27
and though they	27
who had been	27
the defence of	27
because this act	27
that he shall	27
be punished for	27
rest of the	27
that which was	27
matters of fact	27
upon the other	27
of these cases	27
by all the	27
the mercat cross	27
to rise in	27
of the feu	27
good of the	27
in relation to	27
it can be	27
the first act	27
to the justice	27
estates of parliament	27
inconsistent with the	27
the kings person	27
no more than	27
never have been	27
as may be	27
in point of	27
it was thought	27
lord of regality	27
where it was	27
they have been	27
it ought to	27
are not so	27
since this act	27
to the lord	27
find caution to	27
where the crime	27
found by the	27
to the laws	27
that we are	27
he should have	27
by the romans	27
without consent of	27
offered to be	26
and yet if	26
of our law	26
divided into two	26
of our nation	26
the worst of	26
was not to	26
but not in	26
is guilty of	26
this may be	26
the clerk of	26
the first part	26
nor is the	26
of what was	26
of the place	26
all who are	26
to such a	26
and where the	26
they should have	26
to the people	26
to the terms	26
the lord of	26
of the judge	26
belongs to the	26
notwithstanding of this	26
and after the	26
upon which the	26
for which the	26
where they are	26
sir iohn cochran	26
and upon this	26
by an express	26
on the contrary	26
that she was	26
for such as	26
the members of	26
and therefore since	26
of the work	26
nothing can be	26
of the superiour	26
it is sufficient	26
and in which	26
fergus the first	26
be sent to	26
in mind that	26
is that which	26
that the justices	26
pain of death	26
and though he	26
which could not	26
if the party	26
within a bordur	26
to be led	26
king of france	26
if any man	26
in the person	26
all the world	26
and to make	26
till they be	26
of time and	26
the king in	26
in which he	26
in the reign	26
the martial knight	26
but it seems	26
the effect of	26
yet this is	26
till the year	26
and at the	26
at the first	26
but because the	26
far as he	26
and so this	26
made to the	26
done to the	26
for which he	25
owned by the	25
which he is	25
there are a	25
the lords will	25
which it may	25
edition of the	25
as the bishop	25
the sons of	25
and in these	25
at the horn	25
that as to	25
first part of	25
a letter from	25
sent to the	25
quartered with the	25
the royal line	25
of the money	25
which is most	25
but if he	25
that the act	25
it were absurd	25
that the pannal	25
in this crime	25
when there is	25
as opposed to	25
thing that is	25
have been so	25
the history of	25
any thing that	25
only by the	25
this act appointing	25
the justices are	25
who were to	25
authority of the	25
found guilty of	25
of the best	25
of the period	25
did not meet	25
king of england	25
the act is	25
is extended to	25
they shall be	25
that since the	25
all of them	25
such as had	25
which are not	25
though he was	25
the true nature	25
the greatest of	25
mind that in	25
those who had	25
is not in	25
things that are	25
texts for their	25
it is impossible	25
has been doubted	25
in all likelihood	25
it is still	25
neither of these	25
and not only	25
but if there	25
punished by the	25
the government of	25
have been transformed	25
years of age	25
works in english	25
shall be null	25
to be free	25
place where the	25
of the blood	25
under the great	25
out of a	25
with us in	25
admitted to be	25
may be a	25
is the greater	25
of the house	25
know that the	25
many of the	25
been transformed into	25
that upon the	25
justices of peace	25
to the late	25
not of the	25
are obliged to	25
to be of	25
lords of his	25
seen in the	25
was intended to	25
and though by	25
as the first	25
the person of	25
public domain as	24
users should be	24
available at the	24
text can be	24
are a number	24
accurately transcribed and	24
create accurately transcribed	24
of tcp data	24
now take and	24
was chosen if	24
selection was based	24
assumptions that can	24
encoded and linked	24
limit of instances	24
gap elements of	24
by editorial teams	24
texts have been	24
such instances will	24
that they will	24
that due credit	24
are available at	24
or text strings	24
project was divided	24
exprest in the	24
can be copied	24
of the print	24
qa standards were	24
and available in	24
tcp project was	24
teams in oxford	24
all likelihood such	24
title published between	24
aimed to produce	24
only such as	24
phase i text	24
their own purposes	24
will remain and	24
within the usual	24
due credit and	24
although there are	24
opposed to critical	24
markup reviewed and	24
filling in of	24
terms of creative	24
holden of the	24
a work was	24
as shall be	24
was then carried	24
or elements to	24
himself to be	24
by university of	24
which must be	24
a limit of	24
mainly structural encoding	24
texts created during	24
processes should make	24
works are eligible	24
appointed to be	24
but by a	24
all without asking	24
usual project restraints	24
from all which	24
general aim of	24
work described above	24
gaps by user	24
him who is	24
reflect the true	24
assigned for keying	24
number of works	24
transcribed and encoded	24
or lossless xml	24
of subject areas	24
reviewed and edited	24
elements of known	24
universities of michigan	24
university of nebraska	24
linked to page	24
was enhanced and	24
of each text	24
and those which	24
sampled and proofread	24
as of january	24
relating to the	24
these processes should	24
domain as of	24
i text is	24
and therefore of	24
page images in	24
creation partnership web	24
for else the	24
variously as sgml	24
money to be	24
for it was	24
by the french	24
guidelines are available	24
structural encoding based	24
have been released	24
editorial teams in	24
given to their	24
they do not	24
by the institutions	24
and the said	24
selection was intended	24
the publisher proquest	24
textual data within	24
or tei g	24
proquest via their	24
text encoding initiative	24
bear in mind	24
oxford and the	24
to the early	24
is called a	24
judges to the	24
into placeholder characters	24
in english were	24
simplify the filling	24
the cognition of	24
him to the	24
part of it	24
the first edition	24
creating the tcp	24
should make clear	24
the institutions providing	24
works in other	24
the overall quality	24
ascii text with	24
to simplify the	24
every monographic english	24
credit and attribution	24
make clear that	24
accordance with level	24
right of blood	24
illegible were corrected	24
second or later	24
that i have	24
a wing m	24
in the books	24
meet qa standards	24
variety of subject	24
to critical editions	24
nor can i	24
at by a	24
institutions providing financial	24
in libraries guidelines	24
on the new	24
without asking permission	24
were encoded as	24
of works in	24
a singular successor	24
transcription and basic	24
users should bear	24
cambridge bibliography of	24
distributed and performed	24
should bear in	24
aware of the	24
partnership between the	24
is a partnership	24
for they are	24
transformed into placeholder	24
and attribution is	24
image sets published	24
attribution is given	24
of instances per	24
described above is	24
were returned to	24
any remaining illegibles	24
support to the	24
in defence of	24
markup guidelines are	24
p using tcp	24
there should be	24
and markup reviewed	24
coded from proquest	24
at the text	24
project have been	24
record of the	24
far as they	24
is very good	24
use these texts	24
proofread for accuracy	24
have been issued	24
enhanced and or	24
the universities of	24
were corrected where	24
was a compelling	24
of gaps by	24
companies for transcription	24
for an anonymous	24
remaining illegibles were	24
standards were returned	24
large quantities of	24
been looked at	24
text and markup	24
of the fraud	24
the print record	24
as illegible were	24
and or corrected	24
and use these	24
be made about	24
the texts were	24
understanding these processes	24
if the pursuer	24
m estc r	24
or corrected and	24
intended to range	24
to reflect the	24
request that due	24
mnemonic sdata character	24
the usual project	24
any assumptions that	24
respectfully request that	24
the king to	24
the public domain	24
to create diplomatic	24
in defraud of	24
of creating the	24
encoded texts based	24
of the lord	24
to be put	24
for transcription and	24
in accordance with	24
is to encode	24
and therefore chose	24
during phase of	24
assurance was then	24
man can be	24
text is available	24
a partnership between	24
horse and dragoons	24
quantities of textual	24
is the most	24
therefore of any	24
the keyers to	24
tiff page images	24
or that the	24
project restraints of	24
corrected and characters	24
tei g elements	24
yet he is	24
or for an	24
characters marked as	24
that a person	24
if an author	24
who are to	24
to be redone	24
to their original	24
and seing the	24
be marked as	24
be aware of	24
they might be	24
text was proofread	24
we respectfully request	24
of the old	24
then their works	24
usually the first	24
text transcribed from	24
in of gaps	24
quality of tcp	24
lyable for the	24
images scanned from	24
issued variously as	24
at this time	24
keyers to be	24
how can it	24
of the project	24
looked at by	24
aim of eebo	24
found not to	24
encoded as gap	24
of the tei	24
it seems to	24
were encoded and	24
in the hands	24
a works in	24
tei p using	24
via their early	24
wide variety of	24
keyboarded and encoded	24
while the overall	24
in the body	24
as gap s	24
i do not	24
michigan and oxford	24
be found in	24
and encoded texts	24
for the time	24
new cambridge bibliography	24
some readable characters	24
to encode one	24
iv tiff page	24
over a wide	24
of the marriage	24
have been the	24
create diplomatic transcriptions	24
is available for	24
lincoln and northwestern	24
above is co	24
instances per text	24
chose to create	24
edition of a	24
each text was	24
from proquest page	24
later edition of	24
between and available	24
into two phases	24
sir patrick hume	24
but now the	24
unicode or text	24
in the process	24
sdata character entities	24
created during phase	24
would seem that	24
and encoded edition	24
pfs batch review	24
for keying and	24
but that it	24
wing m estc	24
can now take	24
tcp is a	24
therefore chose to	24
for commercial purposes	24
a wide variety	24
their original source	24
to page images	24
on the text	24
is sufficient to	24
the work described	24
the text encoding	24
characters will be	24
sets published by	24
a second or	24
of creative commons	24
text strings within	24
published between and	24
will be marked	24
first editions of	24
chosen if there	24
of the picts	24
data within the	24
files to tei	24
and xml conversion	24
encoded edition of	24
been released into	24
providing financial support	24
who was a	24
and the publisher	24
have been looked	24
and if a	24
this crime is	24
for accuracy and	24
compelling reason to	24
in oxford and	24
the image sets	24
part of our	24
take and use	24
made about the	24
was proofread for	24
and markup guidelines	24
encoded text transcribed	24
on the act	24
texts were encoded	24
the filling in	24
to create accurately	24
the tcp texts	24
about the data	24
corrected where possible	24
this keyboarded and	24
encode one copy	24
to be such	24
reason to do	24
bibliography of english	24
text selection was	24
tcp files to	24
between the universities	24
illegibles were encoded	24
converting tcp files	24
their early english	24
to tei p	24
print record of	24
extent have been	24
published by proquest	24
it is called	24
editions of a	24
to external keying	24
if the person	24
accuracy and those	24
the project have	24
king and parliament	24
or later edition	24
instances will never	24
appears in ncbel	24
whichever is the	24
the tei in	24
the text can	24
proquest page images	24
the early english	24
a tcp editor	24
to a limit	24
of textual data	24
changes to facilitate	24
process of creating	24
and coded from	24
some errors will	24
be punished with	24
but by this	24
unicode or tei	24
the text creation	24
are eligible for	24
was divided into	24
encoding was enhanced	24
available for reuse	24
and some readable	24
time and funding	24
of the letters	24
to one of	24
sent to external	24
a compelling reason	24
tcp aimed to	24
of michigan and	24
the new cambridge	24
released into the	24
all that was	24
and characters marked	24
will never have	24
that we had	24
remain and some	24
of a works	24
by converting tcp	24
tei in libraries	24
quality assurance was	24
been issued variously	24
with mnemonic sdata	24
and sometimes a	24
to produce large	24
by a tcp	24
tcp assigned for	24
out by editorial	24
but we respectfully	24
to facilitate morpho	24
of english literature	24
online text creation	24
i have heard	24
who should be	24
latin and welsh	24
on the image	24
to the keyers	24
these who have	24
to range over	24
was based on	24
it is by	24
books online text	24
of the texts	24
the texts have	24
from the time	24
the encoding was	24
elements to simplify	24
the word of	24
range over a	24
english were prioritized	24
true nature of	24
of a work	24
language title published	24
notably latin and	24
using tcp tei	24
i think this	24
sometimes a second	24
be doubted if	24
encoding based on	24
even for commercial	24
financial support to	24
created by converting	24
proquest to create	24
is conform to	24
restraints of time	24
carried out by	24
sets were sent	24
their works are	24
about the year	24
and linked to	24
and oxford and	24
included and sometimes	24
available in eebo	24
oxford and michigan	24
eligible for inclusion	24
in other languages	24
partnership web site	24
errors will remain	24
data is very	24
texts based on	24
from the same	24
keying companies for	24
any thing in	24
these texts for	24
by proquest via	24
work was chosen	24
processed by university	24
then carried out	24
not meet qa	24
with changes to	24
anyone can now	24
produce large quantities	24
of every monographic	24
crime was committed	24
characters or elements	24
readable characters will	24
with level of	24
scanned from microfilm	24
possible up to	24
phase of the	24
external keying companies	24
publisher proquest to	24
overall quality of	24
text with mnemonic	24
of known extent	24
placeholder characters or	24
likelihood such instances	24
those which did	24
where possible up	24
to be lyable	24
tcp is to	24
images in accordance	24
image sets were	24
of any assumptions	24
the face of	24
keyed and coded	24
should be aware	24
an anonymous work	24
and basic encoding	24
tcp data is	24
by user contributors	24
known extent have	24
this phase i	24
into the public	24
kb of xml	24
level of the	24
strings within braces	24
the general aim	24
but in this	24
the council of	24
but since the	23
committed against the	23
and it being	23
earl of argyle	23
far as the	23
if there were	23
and so to	23
there is an	23
with his own	23
of original in	23
its own nature	23
in the observations	23
law of the	23
it was replyed	23
and is not	23
that the first	23
the quality of	23
that the council	23
he be not	23
to come to	23
not only by	23
no man is	23
to the scots	23
what was done	23
arms against the	23
security of the	23
since the law	23
warrand from the	23
in this kingdom	23
possession of the	23
it is lawful	23
estc r ocm	23
that he has	23
reign of king	23
kings of england	23
as the other	23
which is all	23
any thing to	23
to the creditor	23
that the defender	23
is only punishable	23
his royal highness	23
the decreets of	23
and are not	23
the eldest son	23
should not have	23
i will not	23
the order of	23
part of their	23
were it not	23
which we have	23
the next morning	23
the strength of	23
the product of	23
or such as	23
the scots in	23
of the romans	23
to any other	23
is not punishable	23
not sufficient to	23
of its own	23
the king had	23
as a part	23
may be said	23
to be proved	23
ocm this keyboarded	23
them by the	23
are lyable to	23
was at first	23
so that this	23
the primitive church	23
of the present	23
such as they	23
officers of the	23
for the act	23
as that it	23
the form of	23
as that the	23
appointed by the	23
and he is	23
of his life	23
it appears that	23
by the doctor	23
reproduction of original	23
nor does the	23
r ocm this	23
it is an	23
after they have	23
and of all	23
because by the	23
be judged by	23
to be understood	23
must not be	23
and there are	23
to be restored	22
a person of	22
be found to	22
acts of the	22
the committing of	22
it would have	22
person who was	22
word of god	22
so that in	22
seem to be	22
and by our	22
and not of	22
an enemy to	22
it as a	22
act is formerly	22
in cases of	22
of the one	22
his majesties officers	22
the narrative of	22
as that they	22
but to this	22
in the countrey	22
in either of	22
and therefore this	22
and so not	22
that they cannot	22
as appears by	22
each of them	22
may be also	22
the construction of	22
in the night	22
pursued before the	22
seems to have	22
laws of god	22
the observations upon	22
that where the	22
must be a	22
that case the	22
is not able	22
and all these	22
the king by	22
there were no	22
the service of	22
there would be	22
but though the	22
both by the	22
it was likewise	22
master of the	22
the last of	22
depositions of witnesses	22
to the act	22
which is very	22
find that the	22
of the subjects	22
the same was	22
be holden of	22
earl of forth	22
it were very	22
should be a	22
who are in	22
to the former	22
either by the	22
may be argued	22
but to the	22
the party injured	22
which the law	22
in a case	22
which is to	22
the nobility and	22
an action of	22
to prevent the	22
which they have	22
that it shall	22
it was in	22
came to the	22
as to his	22
and by that	22
as that he	22
are ordained to	22
more to be	22
subject to the	22
should be so	22
far as concerns	22
the isle of	22
up and down	22
have been a	22
comprehended under the	22
who were not	22
to know the	22
contained in the	22
no more then	22
of the empire	22
is in effect	22
that the reason	22
the kings will	22
it was the	22
any of their	22
it would not	22
the office of	22
which was not	22
the raising of	22
and thus we	22
and that all	22
was found by	22
the prince of	22
which we are	22
the defender is	22
upon design to	22
by the former	22
the french call	22
our soveraign lord	22
in the construction	22
was able to	22
in the church	22
that our historians	22
from the french	22
it is presumed	22
it was never	22
of the nobility	22
james the sixth	22
should have the	22
to take away	22
the master of	22
him who was	22
of the nature	22
there be any	22
punished with death	21
to be more	21
the lord russel	21
construction of law	21
opinion of all	21
could not know	21
he would be	21
by an assize	21
same to the	21
for that were	21
the soul of	21
it is treason	21
he should not	21
next to the	21
is so far	21
the desire of	21
is very observable	21
and because the	21
but this act	21
and there was	21
i am sure	21
to have had	21
to be no	21
be punishable as	21
of any other	21
in respect of	21
observable from this	21
with the king	21
the marquess of	21
it were unjust	21
in opposition to	21
and such like	21
because the king	21
an account of	21
which is in	21
extended to all	21
of the principal	21
the said ferguson	21
or in the	21
my lord st	21
the saids lords	21
they would be	21
of a king	21
any thing else	21
make use of	21
of the doctors	21
more than the	21
part of a	21
this act also	21
the same manner	21
allowed by the	21
it was to	21
the glory of	21
the exercise of	21
and on the	21
the french king	21
the person to	21
the eldest sons	21
any thing is	21
in contemplation of	21
so neither can	21
that every man	21
the estates of	21
to the nature	21
in which it	21
to whom it	21
what may be	21
charles the first	21
except in the	21
he who was	21
crown of england	21
be of the	21
government of the	21
even in that	21
it were not	21
and for which	21
of the monarchy	21
for though the	21
see not why	21
was but a	21
still to be	21
of king iames	21
they were in	21
to be believed	21
as he is	21
as they were	21
only from the	21
of the field	21
the act parl	21
one of them	21
the negligence of	21
to be vertuous	21
not be extended	21
the cause of	21
as the deponent	21
which is now	21
to a third	21
the first instance	21
though the act	21
to be called	21
it is thought	21
before the parliament	21
to the mercat	21
of session are	21
as have been	21
of so great	21
for an onerous	21
contract of marriage	21
for the law	21
that when the	21
use of the	21
as i remember	21
and he was	21
to have no	21
called by the	21
to the pope	21
who is the	21
at his majesties	21
this act declares	21
with the same	21
and therefore if	21
the law should	21
antiquity of the	21
such a man	21
to this point	21
there is not	21
there must be	21
the law presumes	21
to the person	21
of these acts	21
and not in	21
of the english	21
when it was	21
and by a	21
as he shall	21
a third party	20
were hard to	20
in to the	20
as has been	20
in that part	20
of the assize	20
the immortal gods	20
it will not	20
defence of the	20
upon this account	20
which is likewise	20
have the precedency	20
but it was	20
and act par	20
the help of	20
burgh of the	20
and yet this	20
by this statute	20
it might have	20
was of old	20
they use to	20
of the disposition	20
relates only to	20
or to be	20
that he can	20
the subjects of	20
to take the	20
who is to	20
eldest sons of	20
which is committed	20
is it not	20
by the second	20
it is no	20
for the better	20
kingdom of scotland	20
may be known	20
and the punishment	20
iames the sixth	20
to be expected	20
it in the	20
as they did	20
precedency due to	20
kirk and mercat	20
some of these	20
of which they	20
when a man	20
all which it	20
because he had	20
cannot be taken	20
but if it	20
but there is	20
he does not	20
that as the	20
for no man	20
from the original	20
lords of regality	20
one who is	20
is the only	20
he might be	20
the making of	20
is not obliged	20
but he who	20
in possession of	20
in the justice	20
i shall only	20
and at last	20
be sufficient to	20
and therefore he	20
may be debated	20
so as to	20
from which act	20
the other two	20
the court of	20
against the law	20
this was a	20
with the consent	20
to whom they	20
the succession of	20
one and the	20
or if they	20
the commissioners of	20
fall to the	20
in time coming	20
therefore the lords	20
damnage and interest	20
of his royal	20
prejudice of his	20
and the first	20
it was necessary	20
since it was	20
is a crime	20
be put in	20
the said king	20
is a sufficient	20
of the third	20
parliament of paris	20
for many years	20
for want of	20
a lord of	20
whether it be	20
oath of the	20
in any of	20
to the world	20
which we call	20
interest in the	20
long a time	20
the head burgh	20
by the bishop	20
the said baillie	20
is observable that	20
the law has	20
yet by this	20
and that if	20
head burgh of	20
fall under the	20
of the right	20
the same is	20
they have the	20
the other side	20
is clear that	19
was done in	19
be obliged to	19
of high treason	19
the security of	19
and as a	19
or else the	19
person who is	19
shall answer to	19
and so could	19
for proving the	19
which had been	19
is the chief	19
with him in	19
the first parliament	19
that the lord	19
that it might	19
and that his	19
the same in	19
clear from the	19
and in our	19
the holy ghost	19
to defend against	19
if the creditor	19
is punishable as	19
the eyes of	19
they have not	19
for all the	19
the roman law	19
was not a	19
be the same	19
before the justice	19
of the justice	19
to that of	19
in the council	19
give his oath	19
if this be	19
should only be	19
should be lyable	19
it could be	19
against whom the	19
the priviledges of	19
reason of which	19
much of the	19
to be used	19
the jurisdiction of	19
and the protestant	19
though he be	19
face of the	19
him from the	19
double tressure counterflowred	19
wives of the	19
except where the	19
if any person	19
which is so	19
and the like	19
issuing out of	19
in whose favours	19
the case where	19
confiscation of moveables	19
be lyable for	19
with it self	19
to be granted	19
his life and	19