Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier	question
A59244	How shall they preach, unless they be sent?
A59244	Quomodo praedicabunt, nisi mittantur?
A59231	But how will it appear that''t is so easily determinable by common reason, which is the right Rule of Faith?
A46856	If he be interrogated by a Judge, Whether he had done such a thing?
A46856	No man ought to say unto the Pope, Why dost thou thus, or thus?
A46856	No man ought to say unto the Pope, Why dost thou thus?
A59239	And how are Habits got, but by oft repeated or very effectuall Acts?
A59239	And what is Virtue, but a confirm''d Disposition of the Will to do our Duties to God and Man?
A59239	It may be ask''t, Why such high Subjects should be writ in English?
A59239	What Duty, either to God or his Neighbour, which through the whole Course of his Life he was known to neglect?
A59239	What Virtue was there which, when occasion presented, he did not readily Execute?
A59239	Who then that loves true Nobility, and the solid Perfection of his Soul, but will apply himself to the means of gaining so high Preferment?
A59239	or an habitual will to act according to Right Reason and Christian Principles?
A59224	And what, said Nasonius, Can this silly thing do in my behalf?
A59224	But since no more was to be done, who could help it?
A59224	But where was that to be had?
A59224	Cou''d the Hydropick Commo ●-wealth ever have been raised, upheld, or grown to this pitch, but by renouncing utterly that puleing Consideration?
A59224	Did we mind Piety when we rebell''d against our Lawful King Don Ibero Formalitoso?
A59224	Many cry''d out, Let King Gallieno keep Victoria, if he will, what is that to us?
A59224	Or any in the World, of what Rank soever,( much less of Princes) to whom the falling and burning of two of their Houses did ever happen?
A59224	Or does any Monarch in the World for that reason refuse to treat with our Ambassadors?
A59224	Then turning her self to the Fiend Fictitiosa, she demanded of her what she would do to get her truest Gallant Nasonius his Father''s three Kingdoms?
A59224	To whom Ambitiosa said, What wilt thou do for my devoted Servant Nasonius to obtain him his Father''s three Kingdoms?
A59224	What Couranto?
A59224	What Gazet?
A59224	What will I do?
A59224	said he, Are you yet such a Puny, such a Novice in Politicks, as to stand upon the weak supports of that sneaking Vertue, Piety?
A59224	— What them?
A59224	— ridentem dicere verum Quis vetat?
A59227	And if we could not defend it, why did we not blow it up?
A59227	And must we have a Garison at every Seven Miles end?
A59227	And was not this a bewitched Place, for such an Army to lie in?
A59227	And who should do it, but that crooked Urchin, whom I have so often mentioned?
A59227	And why did they not follow closer, but lay Lagging some Miles behind?
A59227	Are we affraid of an Action of Trespass?
A59227	But suppose we could not get over this River; must we then lie in our own Country with our Commanding Army?
A59227	But what could we have done, had we been disposed to be active?
A59227	But why could they not march the same Way, and upon the same Ground, that the Van had done?
A59227	Didst thou not read News in the Gazette, Week after Week, From his Majesties Camp at Gemblours, and from the Royal Camp at Gemblours?
A59227	How did Prince Lewis of Baden pass the Rhine this Summer?
A59227	If it was impossible, why did we not march away, and make a Diversion?
A59227	If the Relief was possible, why did we not attempt it?
A59227	If we must Encamp, why might we not have Encampt upon this River( getting likewise a Passage over it) any where above their Lines?
A59227	Now can any Man imagine that these Things could be, if the Devil had not bewitch''d us?
A59227	Or how come these Things about?
A59227	The French run every foot into Our Country, and why should not ▪ We do the like into Theirs?
A59227	Was it not a bewitched Thing, that we should fortily these Places for the French?
A59227	What the Devil then is the Matter?
A59227	What, go beyond their Frontier Garisons?
A59227	Why should not We do it as well as the French?
A59227	Would''st know what came on''t?
A59221	''T is propos''d then( for example) to our Judging Power, whether America be or no?
A59221	Again, many times, when one is smartly questioned, if he be Certain of a thing?
A59221	And, if so, is it not as evident, that all the efficacy of Christian Preaching springs naturally from the Impossibility that Faith should be False?
A59221	But, the Question returns, Whether, in the end of our weighing their Motives, we discover them to be Truths or no?
A59221	Can any discourse be taken higher than from first Principles?
A59221	Do these words sound onely an Exclusion of Actual Doubt, or Suspicion of it at present, which Protestant Writers make sufficient to an Act of Faith?
A59221	For I ask, was it determin''d enough by any Intellectual or Rational Motives to judg the thing is?
A59221	For example, tell him he believes there was a K. Iames because those who pretended to live then have told us so; but what if they were mistaken?
A59221	His answer would in likelihood be to this purpose; what a God''s name were they blind in those dayes, that they could not see who was King then?
A59221	How frequent is it, when any one asks another, Is such a thing true?
A59221	If not, why do we so asseverantly affirm they are?
A59221	Is it not evident from the very Terms that''t is Irrational or without any Reason?
A59221	Is it not evident it must be some weakness or some blind motive in the Will, not Light of Understanding?
A59221	Is it not manifest, this( in our case) honest- dealing Profession would enervate the force of all the Motives they had proposed and prest?
A59221	Must he bring a Syllogism consisting of Premisses only morally Certain or possible to be false, to make the other good?
A59221	Nature will lead him to this or some such kind of Reply; To what purpose should they all make fools of every body?
A59221	Oftentimes indeed they deny Faith to be Evidence or Science, and affirm it to be Obscure: but what''s this to the purpose?
A59221	We finde him assent to the Affirmative heartily; But the point is how he is led into that Assent, and whether rationally?
A59221	What then must the Opponent or Arguer do?
A59221	What will it avail?
A59221	You''l ask, what then must be said of the Phrase,[ Moral Certainty] where Certainty seems to admit an allay of Contingency?
A59221	and the other replies, I verily think it is; he returns upon him with this pressing demand; I, but are you certain of it?
A59221	and why are we bound by Religion to profess them to be so?
A59221	if not, what made it judg so when those Motives could not?
A59221	may not you be mistaken?
A59221	or rather does it not mean that which of its own nature is such as can admit no Possible Cause of Doubt at any time for the future?
A59221	or, if we come to discover they are Truths, how are we so stupid as not to discover withall, that they can not possibly be Falshoods?
A59221	the Impossibility of its Falshood, is made by this Doctrin full as dark a hole as''t is to alledge the private Spirit?
A59219	And against whom?
A59219	Any determinate sence of it, or the dead Characters?
A59219	But I ask, is their Interpretation of Scripture or Testimony Certain?
A59219	But now whates all this to to our Church?
A59219	But when writes the Dissuader this?
A59219	Did not many Protestant Writers holdmany Roman- Catholick Tenets, as may be seen at large in the Protestants Apology?
A59219	Do I wrong them?
A59219	Do not Catholicks impugn them as much as Protestants?
A59219	Do not the best Champions of Protestants object to the Ancient Fathers themselves such Errors in Opinions?
A59219	How then does he hope to dissuade from Catholick Religion, by impugning that which touches not that Religion nor concerns any ones being of it?
A59219	I ask, is the Letter alone such?
A59219	If not, why should they even be admitted?
A59219	In this case does he not think in his conscience it had been better in all respects they had been parted ere Matrimony had been consummated?
A59219	Is it that he brings some stronger or more unavoidable sort of Testimonies then were ever yet produc''t by others?
A59219	Is there requisit some Schollership in the Subject Scripture''s Letter is to work upon, or desire to see Truth in their Will?
A59219	May not any one remain a Catholick, and never hold or practice these Cases and Opinions?
A59219	Now on what does my Ld ground these horrid Charges against our Church, or how proceeds he to make them good?
A59219	Or how can Vncertain Interpreters and Witnessers be admirable Helps to interpret right and good Testimony?
A59219	Should I put upon you all things that were possible, what a Monster might I make you?
A59219	What does my L. of Downs?
A59219	What hath he got then by this kind of Proceeding, taking up better half his book?
A59219	What mean the word Scriptures?
A59219	What means This I do not understand?
A59219	What means admitting as contradistinguisht to relying on?
A59219	at which Mr. Calvin took hold of his own finger, and said, See you this?
A59219	himself renounce actually living with a wife if he in his conscience judg''d so, but keep his promise let his Salvation go whether it would?
A59219	how they''d look If they should chance to lose their paper Book?
A59219	not to put down the words of the Council where it affirms this?
A59219	or rather meer Characters and Sounds?
A59238	But, how shall we know who has True, or Right Principles?
A59238	But, where is this Philosophy all this while?
A59238	Can it be deny''d, but that such very Learned, Acute and Ingenious Men do verily Judge that they clearly and distinctly see their Doctrine to be True?
A59238	How many Instances is the World full of, to prove those Perceptions of ours, tho''judg''d by us most Evident, to be Fallacious?
A59238	How many Thousands, even of a fair Pitch of Understanding, have mistaken Lively Fancies, for Evident Knowledge?
A59238	I should be glad to know whether, or no, you would go about to convince such a Man by Grounds and Principles?
A59238	In order to the Clearing of which, I ask: Was it True before you saw Clearly and Distinctly it was True?
A59238	Is our Iudgment, or Manner of Conceiving, such a Certain Ground, or Infallible?
A59238	Le Grand confesses, this may happen when the Will is Byass''d, or Men are Unskilful;( and how frequent is that?)
A59238	Le Grand very rationally granting, p. 92. there goes more to constitute a Rule of Truth, than to be True?
A59238	Must Truth be built on Men''s Iudgments, or their Manner of Conceiving?
A59238	Must not the Object be such, ere you can know it to be such?
A59238	Must, therefore, all Truth be built on a Mistakable Principle?
A59238	Or Clearly and Distinctly Perceptible to be such, before you can Clearly and Distinctly Perceive it to be such?
A59238	Or, Did it become True by your seeing it( as you phrase it) Clearly and Distinctly to be True?
A59238	Or, Is there, indeed, any such Thing in Nature?
A59238	Or, What was the Rule of Truth to that Object that was True, ere you saw it to be such?
A59238	Suppose I see a Man making great Holes in the Ground, or throwing aside Rubbish; and that I ask him what he is doing?
A59238	The Question is, Which of us has this True Evidence, which you call Clear and Distinct Perception?
A59238	What signifie these, I say, to the Truth of the Thing?
A59238	What signifies yours, or mine, or any Man''s Iudgment, that he Clearly and Distinctly sees a Truth; or, that he must Assent, or may not Assent to it?
A59238	Whence, we ask, What was that which made the Object you perceiv''d- to- be- true, to be True?
A59238	Where, then, shall we certainly find this One, or only- True Philosophy?
A59238	Whether Mathematicians, and some others, who treat of Philosophy in a Mathematical Method, have not propos''d such before me, and made use of them?
A59238	Whether such Propositions are not the most- firmly- Grounded, and the First of all others?
A59238	Whether there be not such Propositions; as those I call Identical?
A59238	Whether they are not Self- evident, and force the Assent of all Mankind?
A59238	Why so?
A59220	20. or what can establish him in his Assent of Faith, if that do not?
A59220	3ly, then I would ask, whether the Firmness of this Assent which he says here Moral Certainty implies, be taken from the Object, or from the Subject?
A59220	Again, what is meant here by[ Divine Revelation?]
A59220	But how will it appear that''t is so easily determinable by common Reason, which is the right Rule of Faith?
A59220	But, where are the Premisses or Principles which are to infer it?
A59220	Can the Ma ● ● er and the Man the Mistress and her Maid understand one another?
A59220	Did ever Logick and Common Sense go thus to wrack?
A59220	For, first, who did ever pretend to an infallibility equal to what was in Christ or his Apostles, as his words import?
A59220	For, suppose we granted that there can be no necessity of an Infallible Society of men to do that which can be done as well without them?
A59220	How Honourable and Creditable had it been to his Cause, and to himself too as a Writer?
A59220	I wonder exceedingly where the Dr. ● earn''t this notion of Certainty?
A59220	IS it possible then that Errour can admit Principles?
A59220	If any, why does he not show us them, and relate to them?
A59220	If it concludes, why does he not say Faith is absolutely Certain, but mince it with Moral?
A59220	If then it have none, why does he put it for a Conclusion, and so pretend he has concluded it?
A59220	Is it not evident he may change if he may see true Reason may be brought against it?
A59220	Is not a will as Certainly a will, and Liberty as necessarily Liberty as a Triangle is a Triangle?
A59220	Must every bold and unprov''d saying, and which begs the whole Question, be cal''d a Conclusion whether it have any Principles or no to prove it by?
A59220	Next, what mean those words[ for some Ages before Christ?]
A59220	Now, who sees not how wonderful an Ascendent both these, if verify''d, must needs have over Christian hearts?
A59220	Or( which is equivalent) that Truth can not admit any, but must be quite destitute of such firm Supports?
A59220	Or, must we needs conclude that all those learned Enquirers found in each of those vast different parties are mad or Insincere?
A59220	Reason or memory; I ask what means this disjunctive promise, either of not erring or not being damn''d for it?
A59220	That Christ said thus, and did such and such miracles to testify the truth of his doctrine, or that the H. Ghost inspir''d them?
A59220	Well, put this Consideration in men, are any of them by vertue thereof yet Infallible, or secur''d from erring in understanding Scripture?
A59220	What if to disown such Doctrines be not to question God''s Veracity?
A59220	how Agreeable to Reason and the nature of Certainty as all Mankind understands it; which now is most Irrational and Unsuitable to the same Nature?
A59220	how he will be defeated?
A59220	or in First Principles, as Aequale est aequale sibi, An Equal equal to it self?
A59220	reveal so plainly the whole will of God, that no sober Enquirer can miss of what is necessary for salvation?
A59230	And how can you, of all Men, suppose he is?
A59230	And pray what more direct or more full Answer can there be to an Argument, than to deny the Premises?
A59230	And pray where does it appear that Mr. G. is oblig''d not to deny that the Greek Church has err''d in matters of Faith?
A59230	And there may be vanity too in our Case, for ought I know: But where shall it be lodg''d?
A59230	And was not the Question plainly of the Certainty of this, and of All this more?
A59230	And what do you more than e''en leave them to draw Cuts, and venture their Souls as handy- dandy shall decide, for you or Mr. G.?
A59230	And what reason have you to desire it?
A59230	And who shall see through the Mists which these Disputes will raise?
A59230	And will any Notwithstanding unprove it again?
A59230	And will not the Happiness or Misery of their Souls for ever depend on that Account?
A59230	And will you assume that the Greek Church errs, who believe she does not?
A59230	And would you have what you say pass for an Answer?
A59230	And your Answer that They are?
A59230	Are you a Socinian, an Arian, a Sabellian, an Eutychian,& c. or what are you?
A59230	Are you a whole, or a half, or a Quarter- nine- and thirty- Article Man?
A59230	Argument than your Instance?
A59230	As every thing is true, and every thing clear; who now besides your self would have thought of an evasion from it?
A59230	But could you not have afforded to inform us likewise by what he was satisfi''d?
A59230	But is it so much as an Argument ad hominem?
A59230	But pray what difference betwixt Heresie and Error in matter of Faith?
A59230	But, why should I vex you with putting you upon manifest Impossibilities?
A59230	Did our Saviour teach, and do Protestants believe no more, than that the Book so call''d is Scripture?
A59230	Do you do any such matter?
A59230	Do you so much as go about it?
A59230	Do you take them for Snares, or Fences, and when for the one, and when for the other, and wherefore?
A59230	For, pray, did Christ teach any Error?
A59230	Has Peter Twenty pounds in his Purse, because Paul can not prove he has not?
A59230	If it did?
A59230	In the mean time why has not Mr. G. done already as much as should be done?
A59230	In these words of yours( p. 7)[ As to the Rule of our Faith] give me leave to reflect on the word[ OVR,] and thence to ask you, who are YOV?
A59230	Is Certainty of this more, and Certainty of this Book all one?
A59230	Must you be minded that an Arguer is to prove his Conclusion, and an Answerer to shew he does not, by assigning where and how he fails?
A59230	Must you be minded that the Business must be stopt before it come to the Conclusion, and that otherwise there is no speaking against it?
A59230	Notwithstanding?
A59230	Or, ever the more Title to an Estate, because an Adversary may have the ill luck to be Non- suited?
A59230	Pray what assistance do you afford them to determin either way?
A59230	Pray, how comes Mr. G. to lye under an Obligation, from which Men of Reputation in his own Communion are exempt?
A59230	The best way, say you?
A59230	What are People the wiser now?
A59230	What reason has Mr. G. to prove it a second time?
A59230	When a Father believ''d what Christ taught him, and the Son what the Father believ''d, did not the Son too believe what Christ taught?
A59230	When a Truth is once prov''d, is it not prov''d, notwithstanding all Objections?
A59230	Why do you think it is with Arguments as with Writs, where the want of a Non obstante spoils all?
A59230	Why, suppose Mr. G. could not prove that Protestants are not Certain, are they therefore Certain?
A59230	Will it shew us, that a Cause can be without its Effect, or an Effect without its Cause?
A59230	Will it shew us, that a thing can be and not be at once?
A59230	Will it shew us, that a thing which can not possibly be chang''d, may yet possibly remain not the same?
A59230	Will your Notwithstanding shew us there was a time in which Men were not Men, nor acted like Men?
A59230	and what wants it, save bare Application, to conclude what was intended as fully and as rigorously as you can desire?
A59230	and which shall they be for; the Argument or the Instance?
A59232	4thly, What is all this to Science, or to our purpose?
A59232	Again, since the Intention of Mankind in asking Where a Thing is?
A59232	Again; is not GOD Omnipotent?
A59232	And did he not evidently inferr this to be True, because all else might be doubted of?
A59232	And why?
A59232	And, how far must this go on?
A59232	But how can this cohere?
A59232	But if you ask, When was the first Olympiad?
A59232	But is not the Knowledge of this Method insuperably hard to be attain''d?
A59232	But now, where is that Authour who has hitherto made such an Useful and Necessary Attempt?
A59232	But, how can we shew that Middle Term is really connected with those Two other Terms in the Premisses?
A59232	But, what if that Middle term be not the same with its own self, but Divided within it self?
A59232	But, what means then the Illative particle[ Ergo] or what sense bears it?
A59232	Can any man deny but that this is the same Thing, or the same Tree it was at first?
A59232	Examples of the Questions proper to Quality are such as these: How do you?
A59232	For instance; To what purpose are his many Distinctions of his Propositions, especially those he calls Exponibiles?
A59232	For was not all that anteceded to the finding it so many Discourses or Reasonings?
A59232	How is he affected to me?
A59232	How is he as to his Understanding?
A59232	How is he as to his Walking, or using his Natural Faculties?
A59232	How is the Milk that''s over the Fire, or the Bread in the Oven?
A59232	If not, to what purpose did he pretend he might doubt of all else?
A59232	Lastly, it may be ask''d, How he is as to his outward shape?
A59232	Or why does Mankind use such a needless Tautology?
A59232	Or, if they say there is, then to know of them in what that Evidence consists, or how it comes to be more Evident?
A59232	Or, what Cause in the World but produces such Effects as are sutable to its Nature?
A59232	Or, why did himself in his Third Meditation say expresly,[ Ex eo quod dubito SEQUITUR me esse?]
A59232	Our Discourse here abstracts from that Question, Whether sensible Qualities are Inherent in the Object or in the 〈 ◊ 〉?
A59232	The Questions of Quando, and their proper Answers, are such as these; When was Christ born?
A59232	This needs no farther Proof?
A59232	To show which we ask, Are all his Atomes of the same Matter?
A59232	We enquire next in what consists this Modification or Affection of it call''d Density?
A59232	What Tree but bears the Fruit Proper to its Kind?
A59232	When did Mustapha the Turkish Emperor begin his Reign?
A59232	When will there be a Leap- year?
A59232	Whence we may have occasion to ask farther what is a Man?
A59232	Where is England?
A59232	Where is Europe?
A59232	Where is Holborn?
A59232	Where is London?
A59232	Where is that Kings- street?
A59232	Where, or in what Place, lives Dr. H.?
A59232	Which Discourse may be apply''d to those who ask, How, or by what means, the Soul and Body were United or made One Thing?
A59232	Why are we afraid of Sinning, but for fear of losing GOD''s Favour, and of a Friend making him become our Enemy?
A59232	Why is[ Infallible] then added to[ Certainty] if it have no Different Signification from it, or do not add some degree of Certainty to it?
A59232	Why then must the Senses be quite discarded as Useless Servants for Knowledge, and be branded for constant Lyers and Deceivers?
A59232	Will any but a Heretick deny this?
A59232	all of them being Equally in the Books?
A59232	can not he do all things?
A59232	or how they will explicate it?
A59232	or no?
A59232	that is, whether after the Composition there remains only One Actual Thing, or Many Actual Things or Entities?
A59242	And what Catholick alive will presume to say this?
A59242	And what needs Princes desire any greater security( say they) what need they trouble themselves with their Subjects speculative opinions?
A59242	And why not good for the Catholick cause?
A59242	But alas how groundless is such a fear?
A59242	But do not Protestants fear him too?
A59242	For by granting only so much, it will necessarily follow?
A59242	For( saies he) what needs any oath at all to detect who are Roman Catholicks?
A59242	Hereto his adversary is brought in replying And what for Excommunications and absolutions, be they in the princes power also?
A59242	How comes it then to pass that they can in England swear that the King is supreme Head and Governour in all causes Ecclesiastical or spirituall?
A59242	Is it because the Oath of Supremacy has so peculiar a conformity to their principles, and that of Allegiance to their practises?
A59242	Now what Christian at this day alive will make these two Recognitions in the sence aforesaid?
A59242	Now who will believe such an Oath as this?
A59242	Or rather will they not be esteemed for such an oaths sake, resolved to be disloyal both to God and man?
A59242	This is known at Rome and all Christendom over; and yet who dare impute Heresy to them?
A59242	Though how can Equivocation be excluded, when according to them one Equivocation may be renounced by another?
A59242	What apprehension have the Kings of France, Spain, or the State of Venice from such promises?
A59242	What then can be imagined more necessary for a cure to so great a confusion, then to change such inefficacious instruments of Loyalty?
A59242	Who can reconcile these things together in such a sence?
A59242	Why?
A59242	Will he require some to be obedient to Bishops as instituted by Christ, and others to renounce them as Antichristian?
A59242	Yea what English Protestant will be willing to make even the Negative Recognition?
A59242	or that they are so ready, and pressing to disclaim and condemn all that themselves have done these last twenty years?
A59229	Again, is it clear out of the Citations nakedly set down, what went before and after?
A59229	Ah, Sr, do you know what you ask?
A59229	And can you do mee a greater Kindness than to discover this, and bee so highly concern''d for it?
A59229	And how must we evidence the Connexion of the Terms( or of the Subject and Predicate) in these First Principles?
A59229	And in what consists this Self Evidence?
A59229	And is it not as impossible in the Church of England?
A59229	And what do such Discourses rely on formally?
A59229	And who would not bee angry, fume and take on against a Discourse which is likely to devest you of so considerable and beneficiall a Prerogative?
A59229	And why I pray?
A59229	And why?
A59229	And, are not you rarely qualify''d to bee an Impugner of my Book, who are so perfectly to seek in knowing what''s the main end it drives at?
A59229	And, has hee not good reason?
A59229	And, what motive proceed those Divines upon in these Censures?
A59229	By another antecedent connexion of those Terms with a Third?
A59229	By finding another medium connected with them: And how far must this go on?
A59229	Can you really and in your heart think they were intended against the Protestants, that you set your selves so formally to answer them?
A59229	Did Christ teach it by reading it in a written Book?
A59229	Do these words[ Authority of the Catholick Church] mean the Book of Scriptures?
A59229	Endlesly, or no?
A59229	I beseech you, Sir, what say you to this Discourse?
A59229	I know, Sir, you will fume at this usage of your Testimonies: but with what reason?
A59229	I was going, Sir, to use your own words, and to ask with what face you could pretend this?
A59229	Is Faiths coming down by Ancestours the same as coming down by a book?
A59229	Is here any liberall acknowledgment that no man can desert Tradition?
A59229	Is here the word Tradition pretended Indifferent and apt to bee taken ambiguously?
A59229	Is it clear to every man''s Eyes and Reason, none of these or other faults render all yours Inefficacious?
A59229	Is not here enough to signifie unwritten Tradition?
A59229	Is not this a strange mistake?
A59229	Is universall consent and most grave Authority of all nations, the book of Scripture or written Tradition?
A59229	Lord?
A59229	Might not any of them come to receive the Communion, if hee would?
A59229	My words in that place cited are these?
A59229	Nay, do not they often mean by Scripture the very Sence of it, that is Christs Doctrine or the Gospel?
A59229	Of what nature are they?
A59229	On Tradition?
A59229	Or can I desire more then this Father offers mee in express terms?
A59229	Or is there a word here to that purpose?
A59229	Pray you, Sir, is this the Temper of your Church of England?
A59229	Shall I bee bold to tell you, Sir, what is Self confidence?
A59229	Sir, where are your thoughts wandring?
A59229	Tell mee then, dost not find thy Expectation deluded, which, Sure- footing had rais''d, and our Controversie begin to slide back into petty squabbles?
A59229	This being so what was hee concern''d to transcribe the whole large Testimony, no wrong being done to them?
A59229	Thus you answer''d my First Discourse, the most solid and most Fundamentall part of my Book?
A59229	Well, but what are those other places which must prove mee a liberal Acknowledger of such an unheard of Paradox?
A59229	What Mephostophilus reveals these secrets to you?
A59229	What means the world[ at present] but that the Tradition of the Apostles is yet vigorous and fresh in the Church?
A59229	Why should I?
A59229	You ask how an Apostle and Evangelist should bee more present by the Scripture ascertain''d as to words and Sence then by or all Tradition?
A59229	You end with a Glance or two at my Self- confidence?
A59229	You''l ask, where lies the Fault in such cases?
A59229	and how do you make them?
A59229	and not rather Assertions of so many nations, or Consent of nations, and Authority of the Catholik Church, of force to cause Faith and Assu rance?
A59229	commonly us''d by the Fathers to signify to us the Scriptures?
A59229	or a greater Testimony that you are to seek for an Answer to it then the strange Evasion you substitute instead of a reply?
A59229	or has any discipline past upon him to debar him from being admitted?
A59229	or what''s the Nominative Case in that clause[ is to mee sufficient] to the word is?
A59241	Again, does he not intend to conclude''t is a Truth, that this is the Letter and Sence of Scripture?
A59241	Also that the Common Maxims of Morality are as self- evident to Humane Nature as any First Principles in the World?
A59241	Am not I sure I shall never repeat in the same order all the words I have spoken this last year?
A59241	And can a Motive or Reason possible to be False, ever induce in true Reason such an Obligation, or work rationally such an Effect?
A59241	And how far must this go on?
A59241	And how must we evidence the Connexion of the Terms( or of the Subject and Predicate) in these First Principles?
A59241	And in what consists this self- evidence?
A59241	And is not Faith it self by these Grounds left in the same pickle?
A59241	And so the business is done; for why should he take pains to give answer to that which deserves none; or, if it did, is answered?
A59241	And what is it to Assent?
A59241	And when he hath done, he asks if any man be the wiser for all this?
A59241	And why does not he produce it?
A59241	But I may blush( he says) and what''s the Crime?
A59241	But can Dr. T. seriously think these words to be indeed so hard as he pretends?
A59241	But how does Dr. T. clear himself of this Charge of mine, or how comes he off from his own words?
A59241	But how shall this be prov''d?
A59241	But is it so clear that I oppose no body he knows of in proving that what is True, is Impossible to be False?
A59241	But pray where did I ever pretend''t is unpossible there should have been any deviation from Tradition?
A59241	But what have I to do with the Persons?
A59241	But why must First Principles be necessarily exprest with that most perfectly- formal Identity?
A59241	By another Antecedent Connexion of their Terms with a Third?
A59241	Can any thing be produc''d more expresly abetting my way of Discoursing the Grounds of Faith?
A59241	Does Dr. T. find such a disagreement amongst men Learned in the Mathematicks, in the understanding the Axioms and Definitions of Euclid?
A59241	Does not every Oratour know that the Style due to a Sermon and a strict Discourse of close Reason, are the most different imaginable?
A59241	Does not he know one Dr. T.?
A59241	Endlesly, or no?
A59241	He asks, If this be true, what need then of my Infallibility of Pope or Council?
A59241	He likens it to the Coptick and Slavonian Language, talks of Astrology, Palmistry, Chymistry, and what not?
A59241	Here are many things worth remark if one had leasure: And first, what means an undoubted Assent?
A59241	How can he do this unless he shews the Conclusion necessarily follows?
A59241	How should it be?
A59241	How then?
A59241	How will he prove any thing to be a Contradiction?
A59241	How?
A59241	I beseech you, Gentlemen, is it the fashion in the Univeesities to solve Arguments on this manner?
A59241	If he say''T is not: I ask him what First Truth or Principle I wrong by making that which is Free to be Not Free?
A59241	If these men then be not indeed or in True Speech, Christians, what must we call them?
A59241	Is he afraid clear Evidences and sensible Demonstrations will not necessarily conclude?
A59241	Is it by means of their being materially the same, or the same with a Third?
A59241	Is it not enough the Sence be the same, as is found in Definitions, but the Words must be the same also?
A59241	Is it not his intent in his Discourses to Conclude ▪ what he speaks of?
A59241	Is it possible there should be found among Mankind a Writer so weak, as to put that for a plain Reason which is so plainly contrary to common Sence?
A59241	Is it so plain that all Mankind may be deceiv''d in their Sensations, on which kind of Knowledge Authority or Testimony is built?
A59241	Is it then by their being the same with one another immediately, or of the same most formal notion?
A59241	Is not the Will Free?
A59241	Is there any necessity for such a ridiculous perplexing and inconclusive method, when we may vouch we have Clear Evidences and Demonstrations?
A59241	Is there then any other way left for these Terms to cohere, which is neither by themselves immediately, nor by a Third?
A59241	Lastly, Is Are needless because there is Nature?
A59241	Lastly, how does Dr. T. know my Style, were I to make a Sermon?
A59241	Might not any one write a Book of such Jargon and call it Demonstration?
A59241	Or the Subject and Predicate be put in the self- same words?
A59241	To this then after his sufficient consideration, What sayes the Dr.?
A59241	To this was joyned( for why should I be ashamed to acknowledge my Poverty, into which that Persecution had driven me?)
A59241	Was Drollery ever till now held a Convictive, or a Jeer a Demonstration?
A59241	Was it not enough to answer the Reasons, and let the World judge?
A59241	Were it not a wise business now upon so simple a Reason to judge that the Stars are undoubtedly Odd?
A59241	What then is become of those famous words,[ It is possible all this may be otherwise;] which were onely objected?
A59241	What would he have?
A59241	Where is this Third Term to prove it?
A59241	Where, good Dr?
A59241	Which bears a show of ridiculousness, and seems to admit of no possibility of advance towards new Knowledges?
A59241	Would any Reader suspect this serious clutter of words should be both untrue, and nothing to purpose besides?
A59241	and in forty other places to make the Droll supply the Divine?
A59241	or did the commonest Reason ever thus go wrack?
A59248	''T is left then that he must pretend he will demonstrate some former Age has err''d; How I wonder?
A59248	3 ly, Are those Testimonies( and the like may be said of Scripture- proofs) evidently against the present Church, or no?
A59248	Again, I ask might you not have mistaken the true Sence without those Human Maxims?
A59248	Again, I would ask whether the Trinity be not Evident in Scripture, and the Socinians wilful for denying it?
A59248	Again, does not he know all the Catholick Church allow more a thousand times to It than to all the Schoolmen in the World?
A59248	Ask him farther; Is there not a necessary Connexion and Relation between such a constant Cause and its formal Effect?
A59248	But how know we who began to desert that Rule, and who ever held to it; or that it was ever held to by any?
A59248	But how shall we know who enjoyes this Tradition, or what points have been handed down by it from the beginning?
A59248	But what were they oblig''d to when they were grown up to ripeness of Judgement?
A59248	But who am I that I should attempt such a change in the method of Controversy, or think my self a fit proposer or presser of it?
A59248	But why insist I thus on so poor a foolery in a Book I design''d for solid?
A59248	But, in case it were deliver''d as ascertain''d by their Senses, to have been taught by the Apostles, what imaginable reason can they have of doubt?
A59248	But, where shall I seek those happiest Effects and noblest Arguments of Truth?
A59248	But, will you see you still hold Reason your Rule, notwithstanding you cry up the Written word?
A59248	By Principles of Faith?
A59248	By Principles of Human Science?
A59248	By what helps or means?
A59248	By what manner?
A59248	Can he Demonstrate the exact conformity of its Letter from Copy to Copy, and Translation to Translation, and this up to the very Original?
A59248	Can he bring an ampler or Certainer living Authority for the contrary?
A59248	Can the ruder sort either know this or be assured of the skill of others by which they know it?
A59248	Cur?
A59248	Did he never hear of such a thing as the Council of Trent?
A59248	Do then these skills clear the Letter of Scripture, that is, make known Gods Sence to you?
A59248	Does he mean we hold them oblig''d to cut their Beards, or wear such Garters and Hatbands as their Fore- fathers did?
A59248	Does he think Faith being planted in Human, that is Rational, Nature will not propagate it self into consequent and subordinate Tenets and Practices?
A59248	Does it evidently speak of Faith or Manners; the universal Church, or particular persons; that is, some Hereticks?
A59248	Does it suppose this Degeneracy already past( which is onely proper to your purpose) or yet to come?
A59248	Especially, since the performing ● evaricating from that Duty is of equal concern 〈 ◊ 〉 Themselves?
A59248	Find you not there expresly that God has hands, feet, nostrils and passions like ours, and this in clear terms?
A59248	For, how should either of these be guided by what they neither see nor know?
A59248	For, whence hapned it that it seem''d so to him when it was not such?
A59248	From Perfection in Science in that particular?
A59248	He asks how you are certain that Book is God''s word?
A59248	He asks therefore whether he is bound to believe what the present Church delivers to be Infallible?
A59248	His raw words reach no farther: What means the word JUST?
A59248	How can that be in your Grounds antecedently to the known Sence of the Scripture?
A59248	How far are you wide of the Truth?
A59248	How strangely wide he roves from the mark?
A59248	I ask, is it as plain?
A59248	If he does, he must hold it was Eternal; If not, how unconsonant is his parallel?
A59248	If so, I ask whether this be clearer in Scripture than that God has hands, feet, nostrils and passions like ours?
A59248	In the former we have it told a General Council what their proper task is; namely to keep or hold fast what was believ''d and kept; and how?
A59248	Let any man, I say, go about to demonstrate all these difficult Points ro those acute men and will they not smile at his endeavors?
A59248	Let us proceed?
A59248	No surely; for then he had not miscarry''d: From the Imperfectness of his Science?
A59248	Nonne vos magis pluris estis volatilibus caeli?
A59248	Nor does Mr. Stillingfleet question this: But, were their Children oblig''d to believe them?
A59248	Or for those, Nunquid de bobus cura est Deo?
A59248	Or is it so hard to finde it?
A59248	Or rather does not Nature most strongly carry them to the contrary?
A59248	Pray who must be Judge it is so Evident in Scripture as to render the Dissenters guilty of flat Wilfulness?
A59248	Quando?
A59248	Quibus auxiliis?
A59248	Quid?
A59248	Quis?
A59248	Quomodo?
A59248	Secondly, is it a Fundamental that Christ is God?
A59248	That is, does it say there must be a Total Apostasie in Faith before the Year 1664?
A59248	The Bishops, or your Church?
A59248	Then he ought the more to have believ''d: From Precipitancy?
A59248	Vbi?
A59248	W ● not the Trinity, Incarnation and other points 〈 ◊ 〉 which we agree held in all Ages since Christ by Gods Church?
A59248	Was it some piece of Skill or a Speculative Opinion depending on the Goodness or Badness of the Ancestors knowledge?
A59248	Wearing their clothes, or building their houses?
A59248	What Evidence can you bring to convince me both that the Church alwayes observ''d this Rule, and could never be deceiv''d in it?
A59248	What do you think Controversy is?
A59248	What is it then that we affirm the later Ages oblig''d to hold and act as their Forefathers held and acted?
A59248	What is it then?
A59248	What means the word ALL?
A59248	What need he counterfeit this puzzle?
A59248	What thing was it which was deliver''d or Testify''d?
A59248	What''s now become of your difficulty?
A59248	When was this matter of Fact or Preaching this doctrin performed?
A59248	When?
A59248	Where shall he have it?
A59248	Where then may I hope to meet those excellent Forms vested with Bodies?
A59248	Where''s his Reason?
A59248	Why are they then so kindly dealt with?
A59248	Why is it not then a point of Faith?
A59248	Why was this doctrin of Christs taught and practic''t?
A59248	Will he bring Demonstration against the Point?
A59248	Will he recur to Traditions help?
A59248	Will you see one Example of our Superficialness and Mr. Stillingfleet''s Solidness?
A59248	Yes very well; How comes it then that he runs to some Schoolmen, and neglects the Church speaking in her Representative?
A59248	Yet how much of his Book would need no Answer, were this Impertinent Topick laid aside?
A59248	You see then these Witnesses have power to propose such an Object as can oblige to Belief?
A59248	if not, it can not overthrow the title of This to be a point of Faith: If as plain, why should you not believe both?
A59248	or what advantage can I gain to my cause by so sleight an Animadversion?
A59248	or, that there were not some in those dayes which never came to our knowledge, different from ours in the very point between us?
A59247	Again, Let us ask what Colour or Figure it is of?
A59247	Again, since the Bodies are put to cause them, how can we think they are nothing like them?
A59247	And I did really intend that Sceptical Men should ask, — Quid profert dignum tanto promissor hiatu?
A59247	And is not this enough?
A59247	And this gives an Entire Satisfaction to every Man who is capable of Knowing Common Morality,( as, who is not?)
A59247	And, Who sees not, that, from this Proposition, Every Man is Rational, it follows, that Peter, John, and each particular Man, is Rational?
A59247	And, whence must we take those Differences?
A59247	Are they Corporeal, or are they Spiritual, or under what Head shall we rank them?
A59247	BUT how can the Things be in our Understanding?
A59247	Besides, what should the Soul do with two Material Comparts; one, Organical; the other, Inorganical?
A59247	But what needs more than meerly his ascribing Materiality to it, at least, permitting it to belong to it?
A59247	But, if no Evidence can be had, what Necessity is there at all of Judging one way or other?
A59247	But, should any Sceptick ask why the Idea of Yellow is the Idea of Yellow?
A59247	But, suppose this so; why must General Maxims be held Dangerous and Faulty, when the Fault Confessedly lies in other Things?
A59247	But, what Good can this do to any, but to such as have renounc''d Common Sense, even to Ridiculousness?
A59247	But; what needs any more, since Mr. Locke has already Confuted that Position beyond possibility of any Rational Reply?
A59247	Can any Man think that Art and Reflexion do add no Advantage to Untaught Nature?
A59247	Can not we suspend our Judgment till Evidence appears; or whether it does ever appear, or not?
A59247	Can the Memory be said to Retain what is not?
A59247	Does the Mind see the Thing without, by sending out her Rayes of Knowledge to it?
A59247	First, If it were the same in Sense, where''s the Harm?
A59247	For( to wave my former Proofs) I ask him whence he had first the Notion or Idea of Space?
A59247	For, First, What other Reason had they from Nature to put such a Power in the Soul?
A59247	For, what are Names, but the Words which signifie those Ideas?
A59247	From other Common Heads?
A59247	He ask''d, Why?
A59247	He is too acute to hold Innate Ideas: It was Acquir''d then, or wrought in him; And by what, but by the Thing, that is, by the Body?
A59247	How many are there in the world who are reputed for Learned men, and yet have no Principles which are not taken from Fancy?
A59247	How many ways does he distort, wind, turn, poize, stretch, and ply the parts of his Body?
A59247	I answer; What have we to do with Ideas when we Predicate?
A59247	I ask, Is the Idea of Extension, as to its Representation, in all Respects like that Mode as it is in the Thing; or is it not?
A59247	I ask, whether, by his Thought, he means his Judgment?
A59247	I grant, that whole Complexion is not knowable by us in this State: But, why have not we as much Knowledge of them as is necessary for us?
A59247	I infer; therefore without it, we should not have had so Clear a Knowledge of the Proof, nor consequently of the Conclusion; and is this nothing?
A59247	If in it, the old Question returns, How got they thither?
A59247	If out of it, How could the Soul''s Acts of Understanding, which are Immanent Acts, become Transitive, and affect a Thing which is without her?
A59247	If then we have an Idea or Likeness of Universality, or Generality, What is it like?
A59247	If this be true, why are they call''d[ Ideas,] which either signifies Resemblances, or Nothing?
A59247	In Answer; First, I ask how he knows God would keep the next Bodies, in that Case, from Closing?
A59247	In like manner, should he ask why a Man is a Man?
A59247	In order to which I ask the Ideists, Whether the Modes or Accidents are Distinct Entities from the Substance or Thing?
A59247	Is Reviving the Notion of Retaining, they being rather of a Contrary Sense to one another?
A59247	Is it Blew, Green, or Yellow?
A59247	Is it Rare or Dense, Hot, Cold, Moist, or Dry?
A59247	Is it Round, Four- square, or Triangular?
A59247	Is it a Yard in Length, or but an Inch?
A59247	Is it as Thick as a Wall, or as Thin as a Wafer?
A59247	Is it as little as a Barly- corn, or as big as a House?
A59247	Lastly, Are those Species they put, when purify''d, perfectly like the Thing, or imperfectly?
A59247	Lastly, What means his making it then to be Judgment, when we have no Demonstrative Evidence?
A59247	Lastly, What means this Power in the Mind to revive Perceptions?
A59247	Lastly, What needs this Circumlocution?
A59247	May we not as well say we may see Light, and yet have no Notion of it?
A59247	May we not judge a Conclusion that is Demonstrated to be True, because it is Demonstrated?
A59247	Must they hover still in these few common Heads of Notions?
A59247	Neither can this be said, for the Mind could see or know the Thing it self were it in it, else how could it know the Ideas?
A59247	Next, how can we know that those Ideas move regularly, and not rather very differently, in diverse Men?
A59247	Next, how does it follow, that, because we can not explicate it, we do not know it?
A59247	Now, if this be so, why can not they satisfie and instruct Rational Men, and conduce to quiet and fix their Judgment, as well as to Nonplus Wranglers?
A59247	Now, things standing thus, who can think Logick, or Syllogism( the main End of it,) are to be slighted as of little or no use?
A59247	Now, what sense can we make of an Idea of an Idea, or what means a Similitude of a Similitude, or an Image of an Image?
A59247	Now, who can think, that meerly to be at Ease, is this Greatest Good; or the Motive, Object, End, or Determiner of the Will?
A59247	On the other side; How facil and natural is my Way of our gaining an Idea or Notion of Infinite?
A59247	Or can Remembring be conceived to be the same Notion with Reproduction?
A59247	Or can there be a Repository of Nothing?
A59247	Or rather if so many, why no more?
A59247	Or that an Identical Proposition is True, because''t is Self- evident?
A59247	Or that no Intrinsecal Predicate instructs, but only what is Extrinsecal to any Nature?
A59247	Or what means it to say, he intends[ Man] by those many Words, and yet would not have it thought so?
A59247	Or what other thing was it good for, but to purifie the Species?
A59247	Or who bids us Judge at all till we see a good( or Conclusive) Reason why?
A59247	Or, if they be not signify''d by the Word[ Man,] how is the Proposition True?
A59247	Or, that, when they strike the Eye, they stop there, and are not carry''d into the Brain?
A59247	Otherwise, why could not these do it as well as General Maxims?
A59247	Secondly, Were those Phantasms, before they were Spiritualiz''d, in the Soul, or Intellectus, or out of it?
A59247	So, Mr. Locke asks, If God should place a Man at the Extremity of Corporeal Beings, whether he could not stretch out his Hand beyond his Body?
A59247	That, to Unman our selves, so as to seem Crack''d- Brain''d, or Drunk, is the Way to become Soberly Rational?
A59247	The Proper Opposite to Probable, is Improbable; and, what has Improbable to do with Absolute?
A59247	The Question then is, What is the Proper Subject of Light?
A59247	This perform''d, what are they to do next?
A59247	Upon my Delay, they call''d me again, and ask''d, Why I came not, having promis''d it?
A59247	What Feats of Activity does a Rope- dancer show us?
A59247	Where then shall we fix the Bounds, or whence take any Certain Measures of Greater and Lesser Probabilities?
A59247	Whether it be not probable, that Thinking is the Action, and not the Essence of the Soul?
A59247	Why are we in such hast to hazard falling into Error?
A59247	Without which, what do we know?
A59247	a Cloth, Board, or Paper, thus figured and colour''d?
A59247	how few Men are there, who will profess to Demonstrate in Philosophy, or to reduce their Discourses to Evidence?
A59251	10. Who could justly suspect, that this innocent, this piously zealous proceeding, should beget an adversary in print?
A59251	4. with Tantoene animis coelestibus irae?
A59251	A Doctrine which they beleeved to have been delivered with as firm and constant an Authority, as any other whatsoever?
A59251	And do you not know, Sir, this new Doctrine fights against the known Laws of your Country?
A59251	And doth not this Doctrine evacuate all the fear of Purgatory, Judgment and Hell too?
A59251	And hath not your admired Master made a fair hand of it?
A59251	And how came these immediately insuing words, to escape his wary Pen, That the Soul without them were more imperfect?
A59251	And if Angels can thus Act on Angels, without this interposition of a body, why not on separated souls?
A59251	And indeed who ever fanfied that the soul could thus be identified, or become the very self- same thing, with the body?
A59251	And is this all?
A59251	And secondly, Whether this his new Question of Charity, was there disputed and setled by this our Bull and Council?
A59251	And shall this new School have the confidence, against all mens experience, thus to give the Lye to the Consciences of the whole Christian world?
A59251	And the Iudg reply; and do not you know, that wilfully you inhere to holy Scriptures?
A59251	And we having, touched something of his new Hell, why should we not see how his A ● amantine Chain reaches to Heaven too?
A59251	And were it not worth my Readers pains to see, and satiate his soul, with the excellent Demonstration of this sacred Verity?
A59251	And what then?
A59251	And yet this was as pertinent, as your — Quid non mortalia pectora cogis?
A59251	Are those very Affections which constitute Purgatory and Hell too, perfections of the Soul?
A59251	As for example, the Divines dispute, Whether if the holy Ghost did not proceed from the Son, he would be distinguisht from the Son?
A59251	But I beseech you Sir, how could those solid, cleer- sighted persons, give you the confidence to impose so grosly upon us?
A59251	But how by this sudden, and unexpected Doctrin, all our apprehensions are changed in the sufferings of our B. Saviour?
A59251	But is this the onely entertainment there?
A59251	But this were tollerable, if this were All: Why should not every man enjoy his own thoughts?
A59251	But what if this accelerating the day of Iudgment prove no advantage, no help at all to those distressed souls?
A59251	Do you Sir promise this new light, of science, of Demonstration?
A59251	Do you not know that words, do not signifie naturally, but by institution?
A59251	Do you not know that you now fight against the Fathers and Monuments of Antiquity?
A59251	Doth the holy Sacrifice of the Altar, which the Church hath defined to be Propitiatory even for the Dead, avail those distressed Souls nothing at all?
A59251	First, Concerning the souls of Iust men, in which nothing remains to be purged, when they pass out of this life?
A59251	For this question being proposed, Whether souls immediately upon separation, rectifie all their affections?
A59251	For what an absurd Exposition of the Council would this be?
A59251	For what can all the Councils prevail against a Demonstration?
A59251	How then is not the soul divested of those base affections, when she passes out of the body, which have their source from this earthly habitation?
A59251	How well doth this agree with that Principle of Nature, That we ought so to do to others, as we would have them do to us?
A59251	I have often entertained my self with these thoughts, what a dangerous method Master White prescribed, and as now appears followed?
A59251	If I deny it, will they not presently hiss me out?
A59251	Is it perhaps, the intermitting at some times, or abating of the fury of their torments?
A59251	It will justly fall under our consideration: First, Whether this our present Question of Purgatory were not then intended and defined?
A59251	Let him fairly deliver us his sublime sense, in his own words: Whether our devotions assist those souls or no?
A59251	Might not this excellent Sermon very well become a St. Austen or a St. Paul?
A59251	Secondly, How frivolously he concludes, That the affections to corporal pleasures accompany the soul in her state of separation?
A59251	Seventhly, Who ever rendred it Evident, that No Alteration can befall a separated Soul from any other Spirit, without the interposition of the Body?
A59251	The Protestants face us down that we make Idols of ● ● ictures, against our own souls and knowledge: What impudence is this?
A59251	The Question was, How many sorts of souls were admitted to the intuitive Vision of God before the general day of Judgment?
A59251	Thirdly, Whoever fancied, That a separated soul shall be tormented with a vast grief, by reason corporal pleasures are now impossible to be injoyed?
A59251	This doctrin presupposed, What can separated souls be concerned when the day of Judgment shall come?
A59251	This puts all to a loss: For how shall it be known when Councils and Consistories apply themselves aright?
A59251	What Goliath is this that exprobrates the Hoast of the Living God?
A59251	What Physitian ever understood fully the Nature, the operations, the effects, of any one Herb, any one Simple?
A59251	What benefit doe Separated Souls receive by them?
A59251	What do you conceive of the holy Apostles?
A59251	What do you think of Lumen Gloriae, the Light of Glory, which is farther required?
A59251	What doctrin shall we have from you of the Saints in this life?
A59251	What further mischief can we expect?
A59251	What if God should again repair this thus annihilated soul?
A59251	What if there were no body, no motion, no time at all, could not God create a Soul, and destroy it at his pleasure?
A59251	What if we could obtain your new Master to plead on the behalf of that Faith we now maintain?
A59251	What is Purgatory( says he to Catholicks) but that satisfaction for sins which the souls of those who depart this life suffer?
A59251	What is it for the now great Trinobant to understand Men and Angels?
A59251	What more sublime things are disputed in Theology, then Father, Son, Generation, Spiration, Nature, Person?
A59251	What of the ever Blessed Virgin, even when she bore the Saviour of the world in her sacred womb?
A59251	What of the holy Fathers ofx the old Law?
A59251	What sense will this bear?
A59251	What shall we hope for in his Theology, now he hath gotten this much nobler Title?
A59251	What should we wonder at these Productions, which out of an absolutely erroneous Method, were hatched, and brought to light?
A59251	What then is the effect of all our tears and prayers?
A59251	What then was begotten in the souls of those holy Apostles and Disciples, who followed our B. Saviour by his Preaching?
A59251	When is this purgation perfected, comp ● eated, ended?
A59251	When then any controversie is to be decided, and a Council is summoned to declare our Faith; what course is then taken?
A59251	Whether ever they divided this, from the rest of their Faith, and allowed it a less degree of assurance onely, as of Opinion?
A59251	Whether he received it in his childhood, when he was first instructed in Christian belief, and which, till he now became a Doctor, he followed?
A59251	Whether it were not their full perswasion?
A59251	Whether the hastning of the day of Iudgment be any way beneficial to them?
A59251	Who ever believed that now in this life, our Souls are really and truly our Bodies, and our Bodies are our Souls?
A59251	Who ever comprehended the Composition, the Properties, or even the Essential notion of a Fly?
A59251	Who ever was concerned or tormented, because he could not do that, which he knew to be impossible?
A59251	Who ever was intollerably afflicted, because he could not Fly?
A59251	Who hath rendred it evident that all this could be effected in one indivisible moment?
A59251	Why should not this great Master be as happy as his own Imaginations, and the Applause of his Scholars can make him?
A59251	Why should we then wonder, if we have a new Purgatory?
A59251	Why should we trouble our heads any more with the Gospels, with Paul?
A59251	Why then should we wonder at the Issues of this Brain?
A59251	Will they not cry out to the faggot with me?
A59251	Would n ● t the Church be unavoidably guilty of a ● upereminent Error, in a Doctrin which draws so much practice after it?
A59251	Would not all Christians be justly charged with an intollerable folly?
A59251	and that we have constantly heard, that souls are delivered out of Purgatory by these powerfull helps, before the Day of Iudgment?
A59251	and trembling shunnest the Digbaean attempts?
A59251	and what more powerful to ravish the whole affections of a soul, then the divine face of her Spouse?
A59251	and yet your self had a ● winkling light of it p. 21. for having asked your friend, when you should see him in the Coantry?
A59251	but where is this restriction?
A59251	did all these injoy Beatitude, or were they imperfect in Charity?
A59251	hath he not now compleately ended his work?
A59251	is there still a higher Court, to which I may and ought to appeal, from their sentence, as to a superiour Iudg and Umpire over them?
A59251	of the Baptist?
A59251	or become an Angel?
A59251	or did this Sun not dart forth his existencies as perfect Charity the immediate disposition to heaven required?
A59251	or had she been less Perfect if she had passed out of this life, by perfect mortification without them?
A59251	or how long do we hinder Fire and Sword?
A59251	or is she then not her selfe because she is without them?
A59251	or must it not of necessity have so?
A59251	or render his body as incorruptible as a Diamond?
A59251	say it is demonstrable, that Souls being purged are immediately in Heaven?
A59251	that such an Author as you are first thrust out of the sacred Communion of the faithful, should expiate or pay for this his presumption with death?
A59251	that you combate an immemorable custome?
A59251	what did Peter, Paul, or Iohn, or our B. Saviour himself?
A59251	what in particular of St. Paul, when he tels us, I live now not I, but Christ lives in me?
A59251	what practise can we regulate by such Positions?
A59251	will you pronounce, That never any Saint had perfectly regulated his affections but just in that very moment he passed out of this life?
A59250	Again, by what Virtue or Power does it work it''s Effects, and how?
A59250	Again, is the Essence or Nature of this Idea of Existence such that it is Essentially Existent, or not?
A59250	Again, when''t is said,[ it is now become a Term of Art,] What means the word[ now?]
A59250	And how can they expect such an Affront will not be resented by an Infinite Majesty?
A59250	And why not?
A59250	And why, but because''t is Hopeless and Impossible?
A59250	And yet, what kind of Thing can it be?
A59250	And, are all these Acquisitions worth nothing?
A59250	BUT what shall the Unlearned Vulgar do in the mean time?
A59250	Behold here the utmost to which meer Natural Reason could raise Souls immerst in Matter?
A59250	But in what manner does this Third Person proceed from the other Two?
A59250	But is this Form or Act, we call Goodness Formally in GOD?
A59250	But must the Climax of BEING, stop in that lowest Degree of Entity, Base Matter?
A59250	But, ● ow, or by what Vehicle, came the Knowledge of those Operations into thy Understanding?
A59250	Can any Man hope to Byass a Iudge, whose Impartiality and Uprightness is Essential to Him?
A59250	Can the Thing, stand for, or supply the place of it self?
A59250	Can they deny that GOD Knows and Loves Himself?
A59250	Can they say that the Deity does not Verifie those Distinct Notions, or that we say False when we attribute them to GOD?
A59250	Can they say, That Distinction of the Substance, does not Particularize it, or ● ake Distinct Substances?
A59250	Can they say, That tho''there be Distinction ▪ in GOD, yet it does not any way or under any Respect, make GOD Distinct?
A59250	Can they say, That, tho''GOD Verifies them, yet there is no Distinction at all in GOD?
A59250	Can they say, that Knower and Known, Lover and Loved, are not Distinct, and( in some sort) Opposite Notions?
A59250	Discourse then being evidently such a Connexion of Propositions, I ask, In what Soil or Territory in Nature do Propositions grow?
A59250	For did they ever lay any Self- Evident Principles, or build on them, as those to which those Proofs are finally reducible?
A59250	For example; I would ask them what kind of Thing is this Pourtraiture or Idea of Existence?
A59250	For inspiring us with good Thoughts, and pitching their Tents about us, to defend us from the Assaults and Fiery Darts of our Ghostly Enemy?
A59250	For, let us ask all Mankind, and even the rudest Vulgar, how many Persons there are in such a Place?
A59250	From what determinate Points in that Nothing which they call Vacuum, do they measure or rate the Perpendicularity of this Motion of theirs?
A59250	Hence is farther shown, that to those who ask, How the Soul and Body come to be United?
A59250	How can that Man pretend to love any thing, who loves not Him in whom are all Things?
A59250	How can they?
A59250	How lamely and imperfectly have ● e reacht it?
A59250	How, then, and in what manner, ought they to bear themselves?
A59250	I ask then, Is it by Chance that those Atomes were Self- Existent, as they pretend?
A59250	If a Body, where dwells it in this habitable World?
A59250	If a Spirit, is it a Created one or an Angel, or is it Increated?
A59250	In that of Being?
A59250	In what Sense, I beseech him, or according to what Notion or Respect do we hold He is Distinct?
A59250	Is it Intelligent, or not- intelligent?
A59250	Is it a Body, or a Spirit?
A59250	Is it a Simple Body, or a Compound one?
A59250	Is not this enough, will they say, for Salvation?
A59250	Is not this, in effect, to give Truth it self the Lye?
A59250	Is our Notion of Existence at least with propriety said of GOD?
A59250	Let''s go on, and ask: Is our Notion of Ens predicated with Propriety of GOD?
A59250	May they not then with equal reason say, that Gold verifies the Notions of Yellow, and Heavy, yet there is no Yellowness or Weightiness in Gold?
A59250	Nor can these Qualities be there by some Material Representation or Resemblance; For what can resemble ▪ Dryness or Moistness?
A59250	Now in our way, how impossible is it to oppose any such Difficulties?
A59250	Now who sees not that such a thing as Respect is not to be found, nor has any place in Material Nature?
A59250	Or can there need any Proxy for what is, it self, Present to the Mind?
A59250	Or do our Catechisms now- a- days teach us Artificial Conceits?
A59250	Or to love Himself, if he loves not his own only True Happiness?
A59250	Or what Virtuoso had ever an Effectual Love or Wish to dig to the Center of the Earth, to make curious Observations of the Rarities found there?
A59250	Or what ail''d them that they could not lie still, when nothing impell''d them?
A59250	Or, by what parallel ● hall we illustrate it?
A59250	Or, lastly, Who would care to lead a Holy Life, if He deem''d that GOD was not Holy Himself?
A59250	Or, who can be so wickedly unmannerly, as to admit Voluntary Distractions, when he is fixing his Eye upon such ● Glorious Object?
A59250	Quod si accepisti, quid gloriaris quasi non acceperis?
A59250	Secondly, Whether these Particulars are not Three, and no more?
A59250	Shall we compare it to the condition of a Child in the Womb on the one side, and of a perfect Man grown up to Rip ● Knowledge on the other?
A59250	These Grounds laid, the Question now is, What is the Analogical Entity or Unity peculiar and Proper to Quantity as Distinct from the rest?
A59250	They will ask why the Denying a Tenet, which is meerly Speculative, should be so hainously taken and severely resented?
A59250	Thirdly, Whether those Three Particulars are not most fitly call''d[ Persons?]
A59250	To come closer then; I ask, What is this Thing they call CHANCE?
A59250	Was it by Chance, that they, or at least the main Body of them mov''d downwards, and not upwards, and this perpendicularly?
A59250	We no sooner alter the Actual Being of a Thing, but we destroy it, and make it not- bee?
A59250	What Figure it is of?
A59250	What Greater Joy, since we know we must die, and that our Soul survives for ever, than to know where our Soul shall go to be Eternally Happy?
A59250	What Man has a hearty Desire to climb to the Moon?
A59250	What Respect ought we to show towards them for the Excellency rf their Nature, and their High Station in the Created Universe?
A59250	What easier than to have a good Intention to pursue our own Happiness, and to do nothing that can make us lose it; and, by losing in undo our selves?
A59250	What heart would not break in the midst of all Temptations, rather than Crucifie again so dear a Saviour?
A59250	What is there of more Use than the Mathematicks?
A59250	What kind of Place will fit it?
A59250	What made them move at all?
A59250	When I set my self to speculate or write, do I know before hand what New Thoughts I shall have, or what ● ● Former Thoughts will Dictate to me?
A59250	Whether Square, Round, Cylindrical or Octogone?
A59250	Whether it be Diaphanous or Opacous?
A59250	Whether it be White or Black, or of some middle Colours?
A59250	Whether it be as Hard as a Stone, or as Soft as Butter?
A59250	Whether it sends out Effluviums or Particles of it''s own Nature, or no?
A59250	Whether the Parts it has do stand Erect, or lean Sloping, or lie Flat?
A59250	Who can be so Ungrateful as wilfully to offend and disoblige so kind a Benefactor?
A59250	Who can chuse but be Astonisht, even to an Extasie, at such a Generous Goodness?
A59250	Who is ready to pardon all our Sins at the first asking, if we heartily, sincerely and penitently ask it?
A59250	Will they say these Distinct Substances, they being Spiritual or Intelligent, are not to be ● all''d[ PERSONS?]
A59250	With whom then will these New Proselytes joyn hemselves in Prayet, Sacraments, Church- Government, and other such Concerns?
A59250	especially, How should He have it still who has already Communicated it, or Parted with it all?]
A59250	● ood- wink Him who is Essentially ALL- SEEING?
A59250	● … ow shall we then frame any ● ● ● Conception of the Difference ● … en thy Former and this Future State?
A59240	Again; Does he think there is no Connexion of Terms in other things, but only in these?
A59240	Against all these strong Proofs of their being Conscious of, and( in what they could) Abetting to this Libel, what can they bring for themselves?
A59240	And now, Gentlemen, is not this mighty Learned?
A59240	And, Did not all the Learned World follow it, till Cartesius''s Time?
A59240	And, by what Rule must I needs speak as he would have me?
A59240	And, for what Reason does he impose it upon me, to hold such an Impious Tenet?
A59240	And, if not; pray, What was your Aim in taking this Way, so Ungrateful to Sober Men, so Nauseous to the Learned, and so Unchristian in it self?
A59240	And, now, where is all this Unheard of Arrogancy?
A59240	And, why so?
A59240	And, why?
A59240	Are Moving more, or Moving less, Essential Differences of Body?
A59240	Are not all Truths, the Objects of these Knowledges, Connected; but some of them stand at variance with one another?
A59240	Are not these most Profound Principles?
A59240	Are you stupid, that you sit studying here, Unconcern''d, when you are proclaim''d a Heretick all over the Town?
A59240	But with what Reason?
A59240	But, Gentlemen, to what end were all these Objections huddl''d together, in their Preface, and Dialogue?
A59240	But, How?
A59240	But, What kind of Form is the Soul then?
A59240	But, could he have more discover''d his own Ignorance, than to call the Knowledge of Men in the Moon, and Planetary- Men, Astronomical Observations?
A59240	But, does he reply to my Answer, tho''never so negligently and carelesly written?
A59240	But, what Return, do you think, was made me, for this Fair and Candid Proposal?
A59240	But, what can not Impotent Passion feign, and pretend, when Reason is Nonpluss''d?
A59240	But, what is all this to me?
A59240	But, what is all this to me?
A59240	But, why does he not relate this Perpetual Decree of the Council, in its own Words, if there be any such?
A59240	Can any Man be so weak, as not to know that[ Either the One, or the Other,] means,[ Neither the One, nor the other, Determinatery?]
A59240	Can any Man of Common Sense think, this is the Method to promote Truth?
A59240	Can this Man do himself a greater Disparagement, than to tell his Reader how fond he is of such Trash?
A59240	Could not GOD''s Omnipotence have kept their First Matter from Moving, when he had first Created it?
A59240	Did ever any Solid Man hold, that the Matter or Form either, singly consider''d, are Things, or any thing else than Parts of a Thing?
A59240	Do I not hold to the Notions of Ens, Unum, Matter, Form?
A59240	Do not all Aristotelians pretend to it, as well as I?
A59240	Do they think I would have taken it ill from any Man, if he shew''d me the Weakness of my Argument?
A59240	Does he go about to prove the Contrary?
A59240	Does he shew that I deviate from the Nature of the Thing in hand?
A59240	Does he shew they proceed upon Unevident Principles, or False and Unprov''d Suppositions; or, that the Terms I use in my Discourse, are Unconnected?
A59240	Does he think that I account all these to be Errours?
A59240	Does it conduce to prove TRUTH, or confute ERROUR?
A59240	Does not Eye- sight, and my express Words in that place, put this out of all Doubt, or Cavil?
A59240	Does not Fire immediately burn us?
A59240	Does not the Denial of this make all Second Causes Useless?
A59240	Does the Knowledge of those Some burthen or fill the Angel''s Intellect, so, that it can hold no more?
A59240	For, What is all this to the Argument?
A59240	For, if they may have so many Operations in the First Instant,( subsequent to one another, in the Order of Nature,) why not more?
A59240	Gentlemen; What can any sober Men think of such a kind of Writer?
A59240	Had Le Grand, had Cartesius any such?
A59240	His Reason?
A59240	His, or Mine?
A59240	How proves he this?
A59240	How, then, does he Answer them?
A59240	However, he will do better than Answering Arguments: And, How is that?
A59240	I beseech him, VVhose Speech?
A59240	I beseech him, who stated the Question on this fashion, or pretended we spoke of This Body, or This Spirit, which only do actually exist?
A59240	If not, then he must say the Council errs: If it be, what is the Matter to this Form?
A59240	If so, is not this all that is requisite to make a Sub- species?
A59240	In what, then, consists this Arrogancy of mine?
A59240	Is it Arrogance to have a high Opinion of what GOD, and Nature( the Work of his Divine Wisdom) have done?
A59240	Is it neither an Assistant, or Extrinsecal Form; nor an Informing, or Intrinsecal one?
A59240	Is not the Council it self extant?
A59240	Is not this Pleasant?
A59240	Is the Soul a Form at all, or no?
A59240	Lastly, If this be a Point of Faith,( as they would have it thought,) why is not this press''d home against me?
A59240	Lastly, What is all this to the Duty incumbent on him, and owing to his Readers, who desire to see Truth?
A59240	Lastly, What is their Scurrilous Dialogue, to their producing, or so much as Naming, any one Principle of theirs; to do which, I had challeng''d them?
A59240	Le Grand has falsify''d my Words, tho''he puts them all for mine: and, that too, in a Distinct Character?
A59240	Le Grand imagine there goes no more to the Interpretation of Scripture, than a hasty Fancy of our own?
A59240	Le Grand to the Reason of it?
A59240	Le Grand''s Assertion, p. 130?
A59240	Le Grand, to take the Manly Way of Arguing becoming a Scholar, and to prove what he says?
A59240	Le Grand, whether he has not forsworn all Sincerity, and Common Honesty?
A59240	Le Grand?
A59240	Let me ask you then, What means all this Railing, and Libelling?
A59240	Let them take their own New Method, unheard of amongst Learned Men, hitherto: Who can hinder them?
A59240	May not Truth be spoke Always, as oft as there is Occasion?
A59240	Must we still throw away our precious Time, and blur Paper with Angry Repartees, reciprocated endlesly?
A59240	Now, in our Way of Doctrine, how easily are all these Speeches reconcil''d?
A59240	Num in Jurgiis ac Rixis, sine fine reciprocatis, ac nemini profuturis, prodigendum Tempus, conspurcanda Charta?
A59240	Or( which is the same,) What is this Thing which is Suspended?
A59240	Or, Is it neither Intrinsecal, nor Not- Intrinsecal to it?
A59240	Or, What Man, well in his Wits, could hope to obtain Belief that I held such a piece of Extravagant Nonsense?
A59240	Or, Why should this exasperate them to a Raving Extasie of Railing?
A59240	Or, Will any but a Mad- man say, that GOD is the Immediate Cause of that Burning, or Wetting?
A59240	Or, are[ Moving more, and Moving less,] Contradictories; as are the Differences I put, and argue from them?
A59240	Or, can not Body be, without being either of them?
A59240	Or, could an Angel, which is a Pure Act, have been Created without Knowing at all, as a Body could without Moving at all?
A59240	Or, is Spondanus''s Relating it more Authentick than the Words of the Council it self?
A59240	Quid hîc faciendum?
A59240	The Council said, it was such, verè& essentialiter; and, if it were Truly such, why may not a Truth, that belongs to Faith, be spoke at all times?
A59240	The Question is, VVhat this State was?
A59240	The Question, then, is, What is this Accusative Case?
A59240	This is said; but, still the Question is, Why not All at once, if Some?
A59240	To what end, then, does he bring such Stuff?
A59240	Vides, mi Amice multùm colende, quòd etiam dum de Pace loquor, Impugnationem aggrediar ac Contentionem tecum denuò instaurem?
A59240	Water wet us?
A59240	Well, but, all this while, what kind of Form is it?
A59240	What Gibberish is this?
A59240	What Harm, what Incivility is in this Reply?
A59240	What Man living dares deal with such an Adversary, who has Omnipotence, in all Exigencies, still at hand, to befriend him?
A59240	What Reader will not smile at his Humour of saying any thing, tho''never so manifestly False?
A59240	What Remedy now?
A59240	What Stuff is this?
A59240	What a clutter does he keep with the Word[ stetisse?]
A59240	What answers he to these Arguments?
A59240	What can stint them to such a precise Number?
A59240	What do these Men?
A59240	What have I to do with the Men in the Moon, the Planetary Gentlemen, or the Pre- Adamites?
A59240	What hinders, then, their having at once all they naturally can have?
A59240	What is Annihilation to Cartesius''s Method to find out First Principles, by denying the Certainty of all his Senses?
A59240	What is all this to Philosophy?
A59240	What is his Answer?
A59240	What is now to be done?
A59240	What is this Midling Form then?
A59240	What is this to purpose?
A59240	What means he?
A59240	What means[ promoted, and admitted more fully to see GOD,] but, that they saw him before, tho''not so fully?
A59240	What replies he to this, in which the Force of my Answer consists?
A59240	What says he to this Clear Demonstration?
A59240	What says he to this?
A59240	Where are we now?
A59240	Where are we now?
A59240	Where did I speak in the Abstract of Essentia, Potentia essendi, or Quo potest esse?
A59240	Who, but a Mad man, could hold two such Inconsistent Tenets?
A59240	Why aliquando only?
A59240	Why did none but his Devil set me on writing?
A59240	Why is my Foot Cloven?
A59240	Why must this Argument be repeated here, where we are speaking of the Manner of Operating peculiar to Angels?
A59240	Why should an Honest Man, in an Honest Cause, be asham''d to shew his Face?
A59240	Would not any Man swear now that all was Cock- sure?
A59240	that is, How shews he these Words, thus put together, in my Books?
A59240	the same that is meant by the Word[ Thing?]
A59234	& c. And they reasoned with themselvs, saying, If we shall say from heaven, he will say unto us, Why did ye not then believe him?
A59234	& c. how is she become as a widow?
A59234	( i. e.) Is ignorance fit to commend learning, or folly me ● ● to praise wisdom?
A59234	( i. e.) how long wilt thou delay to send me help?
A59234	A note of Interrogation marked thus —?
A59234	Addubitatio sola est, — Heu quae nunc tellus, quae me aequora possunt Excipe ● e?
A59234	After whom is the King of Israel come out?
A59234	Alas, what can saying make them believe, whom seeing can not perswade?
A59234	Am I a God at hand?
A59234	An mihi cantando victus non redderet ille?
A59234	And against whom hast thou exalted thy voyce, and lifted up thine eyes on high?
A59234	And he saith unto them, Is it lawful to do good on the Sabbath dayes, or to do evill?
A59234	And shall so eminent a vertue be expelled, thrust out, banished, and cast away from the City?
A59234	And thou Lord, how long?
A59234	And would any wise man ever have so said?
A59234	Are they Hebrews?
A59234	Are they Ministers of Christ?
A59234	Art thou in poverty?
A59234	Art thou rich?
A59234	Can a man take fire in his bosome, and his cloaths not be burnt?
A59234	Can a woman forget her sucking child?
A59234	Can one goe upon hot coles, and his feet not be burnt?
A59234	Can the Host of Heaven help me?
A59234	Can the flag grow without water?
A59234	Can the rush grow up without mire?
A59234	Can the rush grow up without mire?
A59234	Can the stag grow without water?
A59234	Cicero for Milo: What should Milo hate Clodius, the flower of his glory?
A59234	Creditis avectos hostes?
A59234	Darest thou presume to praise him?
A59234	David when he would abase himself, cryes out; Who am I, O Lord God?
A59234	Dicet aliquis; Haec igitur est tua disciplina?
A59234	Did I walk abroad to see my delight?
A59234	Did the Sun ever bring fruitful Harvest, but was more hot than pleasant?
A59234	Did you mark his speeches?
A59234	Dixi, filium habeo; ah quid dixi?
A59234	Dost thou now govern the Kingdom of Israel?
A59234	Doth God prevert judgement?
A59234	En quid agam?
A59234	Esau speaking of his brother Jacob, saith, Is he not rightly called Jacob?
A59234	Et procul, ò miseri, quae tanta insania, cives?
A59234	Et quae tanta fuit Romam tibi causa videndi?
A59234	Et quisquam numen Junonis adoret?
A59234	Facinus est vincire civem Romanum, scelus verberare, prope patricidium necare: quid dicam in crucem tollere?
A59234	Facti quasi poenitentia: Sed quid ego ità gravem personam induxi?
A59234	For doe I now perswade men, or God?
A59234	For this thy shameful and accursed fact, what shall I call thee?
A59234	Give me neither poverty nor riches; feed me with food convenient for me: lest I be full and deny thee, and say, Who is the Lord?
A59234	God hath given them the spirit of slumber: what''s that?
A59234	Hath this world a government?
A59234	Have not I commanded thee?
A59234	Have we not prophesied in thy name; have we not cast out Devils in thy name, and done miracles in thy name?
A59234	Have you any fathers that be not sometimes froward?
A59234	Have you any of your children that be not sometimes cumbersome?
A59234	How is my Sun, whose beams are shining bright, Become the cause of my dark ugly night?
A59234	How is this suffered?
A59234	How much then is a man better then a sheep?
A59234	If I be a Master, where is my fear?
A59234	If I have spoken evill, bear witnesse of the evill: but if well, why smitest thou me?
A59234	If he be a good man, why speak you ill of him?
A59234	If the righteous scarcely be saved, where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear?
A59234	If then I be a father, where is mine honour?
A59234	If thou doe well, shalt thou not be accepted?
A59234	In English, What doe you and your sister make?
A59234	Is Ephraim my dear son?
A59234	Is any thing too hard for God?
A59234	Is his mercy clean gone for ever?
A59234	John 21.15,& c. Thus Christ speaks to Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas lovest thou me more then these?
A59234	Joseph was amongst his brethren, did I say brethren?
A59234	Men and Brethren, what shall we doe to be saved?
A59234	My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?
A59234	My soul is sore vexed, but thou O Lord how long?
A59234	Nomadumque p ● tam connubia supplex?
A59234	Non arma expedient, totaque ex urbe sequentur?
A59234	Nunquid, vos Medici, quid characteres ficti?
A59234	O Lord our Lord, how excellent is thy name in all the world?
A59234	O Naves, referent in mare te novi Fluctus: O quid agis?
A59234	Oh death, where is thy sting, oh grave, where is thy victory?
A59234	Or how do I captiv''d in this dark plight, Bewail the case, and in the cause delight?
A59234	Out of the same mouth proceedeth blessing and cursing: Doth a fountain send forth at the same place sweet water and bitter?
A59234	Paul corrects his doubtfulnesse of Agrippa''s belief, where he saith, Believest thou King Agrippa?
A59234	Paul uses the words of Epicures, What advantages it me, if the dead rise not?
A59234	Prima velut mediis, mediis ita Epanodos i m a Consona dat repetens: Crudelis tu quoque mater; Crudelis mater magis, an puer improbus ille?
A59234	Quam bene, Caune, meo poteras gener esse parenti?
A59234	Quam bene, Caune, tuo poteram nurus esse parenti?
A59234	Quem alienum fidum invenies, si tuis hostis fueris?
A59234	Quid faciam?
A59234	Quid facies facies Veneris cum veneris antè?
A59234	Quid his immoror?
A59234	Quid hoc esse censes?
A59234	Quid hoc esse existimas?
A59234	Quid memorem, efferam, repetam?
A59234	Quid non mortalia pectora cogit Auri sacra fames?
A59234	Quid plus videret, qui intrasset?
A59234	Quid tu& soror facitis?
A59234	Quis Locus aut Lacus?
A59234	Quousque tandem, Catilina, abutere patientiâ nostrâ?
A59234	Quàm celeriter Pompeio duce belli impetus navigavit?
A59234	Sed haec utcumque ignoscenda, illud quis ferat?
A59234	Sed quid opus est verbis?
A59234	Sed vos qui tandem?
A59234	Sees ● not thou these Trophies erected in his honor, and his honor shining in these Trophies?
A59234	Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
A59234	Shall we therefore curse the Sun?
A59234	Some man will say, How are the dead raised up?
A59234	Superatne& vescitur aura Aetherea, nec adhuc crudelibus occubat umbris?
A59234	Tantamne rem tam negligenter agier?
A59234	Tell us( say they) for whose cause is this evill come upon us?
A59234	That they are not necessary, you can not say; for what more necessary in your life, then to write well?
A59234	The chief Priests and the Elders of the people came unto Christ, as he was teaching and said, By what authority dost thou these things?
A59234	They will marry, having condemnation; Now, least any might, What, for marrying?
A59234	Thou that preachest a man should not steal, dost thou steal?
A59234	Thou that sayst a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery?
A59234	Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thy self?
A59234	Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet find fault?
A59234	Thus Virgil, Ah Corydon, Corydon, what madnesse hath thee moved?
A59234	Thus in English, Whether the worst, the child accurst, or else the cruel mother?
A59234	Unkindness moved me, and what can so throuble me, or wrack my thoughts are unkindness?
A59234	Vbi gentium?
A59234	Vos agri, vos parietes obtestor; an non sudabatis, cum tantum nefas hoc loco perpetrabatur?
A59234	Were it your case, what would you answer?
A59234	What didst thou covet?
A59234	What have I to do with the multitude of your sacrifices, saith the Lord?
A59234	What man is there living, but will pitty such a case, if he be a man?
A59234	What profit hath a man of all his labour which he hath under the Sun?
A59234	What shall I doe?
A59234	What then?
A59234	What''s more odious then labour to the idle, fasting to the glutton, want to the covetous, shame to the proud, and good laws to the wicked?
A59234	When we demand a question; as, Cujum pecus?
A59234	When we earnestly affirm; as, Quousque tandem, Catilina, abutere patientiâ nostra?
A59234	Where is the wise?
A59234	Wherefore doth the way of the wicked prosper?
A59234	Whither shall I goe from thy Spirit?
A59234	Who are these that flie as a clowd, and as the Doves to their windows?
A59234	Who art thou, O great Mountain?
A59234	Who can understand his errors?
A59234	Who is a God like unto thee, that pardoneth iniquity, and passeth by the transgression of the remnant of his heritage?
A59234	Who is a God like unto thee?
A59234	Who more worthy of renown, honour and same, then Caesar?
A59234	Whom hast thou reproached, and blasphemed?
A59234	Why did the knees prevent me?
A59234	Why dyed I not from the womb?
A59234	Why should I sharply reprove him?
A59234	Will the Lord cast off for ever?
A59234	Wilt thou believe a Scot?
A59234	Would you judge him unworthy to be your friend, that began his fidelity with an inviolable Covenant never to be an enemy?
A59234	a wretch?
A59234	ad i d, quod est hujus causa caput, festinet oratio: In English thus, Why stay I upon these things?
A59234	after a dead dog, and after a flea?
A59234	am I not also a God a far off?
A59234	an Meliboei?
A59234	and hate our children?
A59234	and what is my house that thou hast brought me hitherto?
A59234	and whence comest thou?
A59234	and will he be favourable no more?
A59234	and with what bodies shall they come?
A59234	audistis gravissima, sed audietis graviora: In English, But these things howsoever to be forgiven, who can bear that?
A59234	aut quid misero mihi denique restat?
A59234	aut ulla putatis Dona carere dolis Danaum?
A59234	before Zerubbabel thou shalt be a plain,& c.( i. e) Thou lookest very big and great, but who art thou?
A59234	can Angels help me?
A59234	can these inefriour creatures help me?
A59234	did you note his looks?
A59234	disobey our fathers?
A59234	from heaven, or men?
A59234	habere me?
A59234	how doth the City sit solitary, that was full of people?
A59234	if he be naught, why doe you keep him company?
A59234	is he a pleasant childe?
A59234	nay but, oh man, who are thou?
A59234	or doe I seek to please men?
A59234	or doth the Almighty pervert justice?
A59234	or loweth the Oxe over his sodder?
A59234	or whither shall I flie from thy presence?
A59234	or why the breasts that I should suck?
A59234	quid deinde rogabo?
A59234	quid istis?
A59234	quid plura?
A59234	quid vocabula ignota?
A59234	quo terrarum abiit?
A59234	roger, anne rogem?
A59234	rursusne procos irrisa priores Experiar?
A59234	shall we sin because we are not under the Law, but under grace?
A59234	sic notus Vlysses?
A59234	so am I: are they Israelites?
A59234	so am I: are they the seed of Abraham?
A59234	the children of Israel taunt at Moses, Because there were no grave ● in Egypt, hast thou taken us away to die in the wilde ● nesse?
A59234	to save life, or to kill?
A59234	uses 〈 … 〉 h ● ● affirmation Do they not erre that devise evill?
A59234	what didst thou desire?
A59234	what didst thou wish?
A59234	what is thine occupation?
A59234	what shall I pretend?
A59234	what was he that might be compared to him, either in courage of heart, in fortitude of minde, or magnanimity of nature?
A59234	where is the Scribe?
A59234	whither shall I flie?
A59234	who amongst men was his equal in knowledge, understanding, policie and wisdom?
A59234	who hath resisted his will?
A59234	who more worthily esteemed, beloved, reverenced and honoured then noble Cesar?
A59234	whom shall I blame?
A59234	why did I not give up the ghost when I came out of the belly?
A59234	— Quid non mortalia pectora cogis Auri sacta fames?
A59243	( Hold Doctor, the Testimonies should have told us that; why do you forestal them?)
A59243	73?
A59243	Again, ask him whether those first three century of yeares treat of all late ▪ sprung Negatives?
A59243	Again, if the Metropolitan dissent from his own Primate or Patriarch, but agree with all the rest, is it yet schism?
A59243	And I pray( good Doctor) where did you read the Greek 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 explicated for honor or dignity?
A59243	And are not those punishable?
A59243	And how, think you?
A59243	And in what History do you finde such a dignity, as an Apostolical Seat in common?
A59243	And indeed how can you think those, who can not employ sufficient time to study out their Faith, should be otherwise instructed than by Credulity?
A59243	And was it not well done think you?
A59243	And what sin, or seeming to sin, is this, think you?
A59243	And who denies it?
A59243	Are none of these therefore Catholikes?
A59243	Are there any of these laws which are not equivalently in France, Spain, Germany; Nay Italy it selfe?
A59243	Ask him next, why hee recurs to such obscure times, and stark dumb in our present controversies?
A59243	Because( forsooth) not Peter alone, but James and John entrusted that charge to him: What a miserable Doctor is this?
A59243	Besides, suppose there had been neither Pope nor King, was there any impossibility that consent of Bishops might remove the Primacy to another See?
A59243	Besides, whom doe you call Christians?
A59243	But in a word, is not this renouncing the Pope the most essential point of your Reformation?
A59243	But let us ask first by whose interpretation of Scripture he will contest his Negatives?
A59243	But perhaps you would not have this method used in matters of Religion: And why not?
A59243	But the Doctor says they were early famous; I ask him, were they earlier than our Saviours chusing twelve Apostles, and Simon Peter the first?
A59243	But the Doctor will have the contrary a demonstration, and who can help it?
A59243	But what are those grounds in particular, by which he will contest his doctrines?
A59243	But what is become of the King or Emperour all this while, is he no body now, who before was the Chief?
A59243	But what''s all this to us?
A59243	But why onely foure?
A59243	But you complain for nothing; what persecution suffer you in England in comparison of the Catholikes?
A59243	But, to return to our six Testimonies: By what means, think you, does he make them speak to his purpose?
A59243	Can any man think he intendeth other then to mock his Auditory?
A59243	Can the beginning of such a vast power be obscure?
A59243	Could these things bee done without judging and despising?
A59243	Did not you persecute Puritans and Brownists?
A59243	Did they stick close to, and constantly claim their non subjection to the Pope, from Canons or Scripture?
A59243	Do you your obligation; why should their backwardnes in their duties make you deny yours?
A59243	Doctor, it is a wonderful commendation to your Church that she is yet to bee taught: Pray, when will she be at age to leave going to School?
A59243	Doctor, tell me what it is to acknowledge the foundation laid by Christ and his Apostles?
A59243	Doctor?
A59243	Doctor?
A59243	Doe wee professe the Pope can pretend no more than his right?
A59243	Doe you not now complain to bee persecuted by others?
A59243	Doe you not see our Priests, when discover''d, proceeded against as Traitors?
A59243	Doe you think it is uncharitablenesse to judge as our Saviour judg''d; that is, to beleeve what he said to be true?
A59243	Does he think the Unity of such a Head conduces nothing to the preservation of Unity in Faith, which yet he grants to a far more inferiour, Bishop?
A59243	Ergo Kings are supreme in Ecclesiastical affairs?
A59243	For Gods sake, Mr. Dr. whither would you have cast us?
A59243	For ask him, are those few Heads all that are necessary?
A59243	General Councils, and the consent of Christendome for twelve hundred yeares, and rely upon your own judgments to interpret the rest as you list?
A59243	Good Brother Doctor tell mee how we despise you?
A59243	Good Mr. Dr, whom should the Faithful beleeve in telling them the sence of Gods word, if not the Church?
A59243	Have not they as great an Authority as any private Patriarch, Primate, Arch- Bishop, Bishop, Dr. Hammond, or a Deacon?
A59243	How did the Ravennates behave themselves in the business?
A59243	How does he prove they were not Protestants?
A59243	How follows that?
A59243	How hast thon cut off thy self from so many flocks?
A59243	How know you it was usurpt?
A59243	How ridiculous, how impudent a manner of speaking and arguing is this?
A59243	How would you take it, if one should spit in your face, and justifie the affront, because his breath is sweet?
A59243	I pray then Master Doctor, why could not the Metropolitans have consecrated the first, as well as the others, if that signifie independency?
A59243	If it were so, how does that acquit you?
A59243	If not, how can we judge of them by Scripture, which speakes more obscurely of them?
A59243	If they be clearer in Scripture, what needed we those depositives at all, and to what end does that Apostolical Providence serve?
A59243	If this be so, what can justifie your bloody Lawes, and bloodier Execution, for the fourscore years you were in power?
A59243	Is Magistracy or Royalty rejected, when Pleas are commenced against Kings or Commonwealths, as going beyond their true Jurisdiction?
A59243	Is it perhaps the true sence of Scripture, but restrain''d to fundamentals?
A59243	Is it such an impossible matter for the meanest person that hath age enough, to know what doctrine was held by Christians ten yeares agoe?
A59243	Is it the true sence of the Scripture?
A59243	Is it to acknowledge Scripture?
A59243	Is not a Parliament the General Representative of the Nation, unless every Lord, though a known and condemn''d Rebel, be summon''d?
A59243	Is not the Papal Authority greater then the Authority of any Patriarch, Primate, Arch- Bishop, Bishop, Dr. Hammond, or a Deacon?
A59243	Is not this as evident as all History, and even our very eyes can witnesse a truth?
A59243	Is this man fit to be accounted 〈 ◊ 〉 expounder of Gods Word, who thus wilfull perverts, and purposely contradicts it?
A59243	Lastly, What became of the Jews which( a ● … is manifest in this eight and twentieth Chapter and twenty fourth verse) were converted by St. Paul?
A59243	Lastly, what is the Doctors intent in saying Christ did not appoint the Church of Rome conservatory( for ever) of all Christian truth?
A59243	Let the Bishop bee now asked, whether Kings deserve to bee deposed, and Monarchy it self ● rejected for such abuses as hee gathers against the Pope?
A59243	Let the testimony it self be what it will, what was the Doctor dreaming on when he produced it?
A59243	Look whether your Proselytes doe not rely even upon your private Authority?
A59243	Must they stand by, and look on while St. Paul converts all the Gentiles, and St. Peter all the Iews?
A59243	Next, does the Testimony say, That the Emperor priviledged them from subjection to the Pope, as Head of the Church?
A59243	Next, if a Bishop dissent from an heretical Metropolitan, but consents with a Catholick Patriarch, is it yet Schism?
A59243	Num potest obscurum esse initium tam immensae potentiae, praesertim si intra hominum memoriam nata sit?
A59243	Or, what follows hence?
A59243	Pray, by whom did she send them down and recommend them to you?
A59243	Secondly, What is become of General Councils all this while?
A59243	Suppose it were equally; what follows thence?
A59243	Surely all imagin so, but Dr. Hammond and his fellows; why is this over- slipt then, as if it were a matter of nothing?
A59243	The affairs of the Head depend on the Arms and Shoulders; therefore will the Doctor infer they are supreme or highest?
A59243	The fourth is from Optatus, noting it as a schismatical piece of language in the Donatists to say, Quod Imperatori cum Ecclesiâ?
A59243	Therefore St. Peter not chief of the Apostles?
A59243	Therefore what?
A59243	Thirdly, What is become of Schism against the Head of the Church?
A59243	To prove his position, he tells us, The Nations converted by St. Paul, were not to be ever subject to that Chair, where St. Paul sate?
A59243	To what purpose was it to bring such unnecessary and frivolous distinctions, and afterwards wave them?
A59243	Unlesse the Catholikes were once thus in you, how could you cast them out?
A59243	Was ever such a confusion heard of?
A59243	Was ever such an ID EST heard off?
A59243	Were ever such mistakes incident to any other man, as are natural to this Doctor?
A59243	Were wee, who now live, alive 900. yeares agoe?
A59243	What King now could bee so hard- hearted as to punish a Rebel defending himself with such a wise, solid, and rational plea?
A59243	What Laws make it Treason to become a Protestant, as they do to bee reconciled to the Catholike Religion?
A59243	What Priest was so bad, whom you were not ready to entertain with honour, if hee would take party with you?
A59243	What a desperate attempt then is it to bite at this bridle, and strive to put the whole Christian World in confusion?
A59243	What a terrible business is this?
A59243	What an Argument is here, to bring for an up- shot of his proofs, That the King is Head of the Church?
A59243	What an unpardonable blindness was this to prove St. Paul over the Gentiles onely, by a Testimony which entitles him to the whole entire Nation?
A59243	What difficulty in this?
A59243	What dignity had Ephesus for St. Iohus sitting in it, that the like should be given to Iustiniana?
A59243	What does the Dr?
A59243	What follows hence against St. Peters authority?
A59243	What is his meaning?
A59243	What is this man about, that hee so forgets the question?
A59243	What man living is able to withstand so potent and cunning an Adversary?
A59243	What means his All this?
A59243	What then?
A59243	What trivial stuff is this?
A59243	What will become of this malefactor, Master Doctor?
A59243	What''s this to the purpose, if none that have a true right, be excluded?
A59243	Where first, I would ask the Doctor in which of these words he places most force; in, Their Consecration by their own Suffragans, and by no other?
A59243	Where then is the Catholick Church, of which we ought to be members?
A59243	Whereas, what more ordinary then to plead two titles at Law,( as for example, birth- right, and a formerly- given judgment) for the same thing?
A59243	Who is so impertinent, as to quarrel at the generalness of a Parliament, if some Court ▪ Lords bee admitted to their Voices?
A59243	Who will not grant him this at the first word?
A59243	Who would not think he intended to treat the question in earnest, seeing him begin with so serious a Preamble?
A59243	Why the Lay- man, that harboured any such person, made liable to the same forseiture of estate and life?
A59243	Why were Baptisms, Churchings, Burials, Marriages, all punished?
A59243	Why were men forced to goe to your Synagogues under great penalties?
A59243	Will hee justifie, that if the m ● ● demeanours pretended against them had been true, the extirpation of Prelacy had been lawfull?
A59243	Will not any judicious Reader think such Rules as these like to binde all good Christians to bee concluded by them?
A59243	Would you throw the house out of the windowes?
A59243	Your second Quere is, Whether this were not done by him, before ever he came to Rome?
A59243	all that cry Lord, Lord, that is, professe the name of Christ, but deny the onely certain Rule to come to the knowledge of his Law?
A59243	are they in as little communication with the Pope, as Henry the eighth after his breach, or the Protestants in Q Elizabeths times?
A59243	because they persecuted Protestants: what then?
A59243	did St. Peter vote the contrary, and St. Iames his sentence oversway?
A59243	did not Luther persecute Carolstadius and Zuinglius?
A59243	doe they not now in Germany and other Countries?
A59243	of Rome was not appointed by Christ?
A59243	or are they who lived 900. years ago, alive now?
A59243	or does he think a legitimate Authority in common is rejected, when the particular faults of them who are in Authority are resisted?
A59243	or if the number of Voters in some Parliaments bee fewer than in others?
A59243	or is the question of this or that particular action of the Popes?
A59243	or unless every Member, that has a right to sit there, bee present?
A59243	or was his breach but the conservation of these Lawes, and wee began our Religion there?
A59243	or whether there may not easily bee made a collection of as many an I great misgovernments against the Court of England, or any other Country?
A59243	or why are not they Reformers as well as you?
A59243	such pitiful guessing Southsayers as you?
A59243	were not those Lawes in force in the beginning of Henry the eighths Reign?
A59243	what a weak reed you catch at to secure you from falling into the gulfe of Schism?
A59243	when will she be out of her prentice- like tutorage, and set up for her selfe to professe truth, as a Church should do?
A59243	will you make all these, Papists?
A92925	?
A92925	A secure method of disputing?
A92925	A weighty caution?
A92925	AND now, understanding Reader, what dos''t thou expect further?
A92925	Again, since it hath been shown they may renounce the Faith of a fallible Church, why may they not renounce her Government?
A92925	Again, was there not room enough in Antioch( and the like may much better be said of Rome) for two to preside& preach in?
A92925	Again, were S. Peter necessitated to iustify himself, how does it follow that he must therefore need''s speak first?
A92925	An hard case, that after thrice saing, Simon Son of Ionas louest thou me?
A92925	And are not these pretty mistakes?
A92925	And how proves hee that the Apostles intended this creed as a list of all fundamentalls?
A92925	And how proves hee that this country had any by that Council?
A92925	And how proves hee the application, that England was never anciently under the Pope as Head of the Church?
A92925	And how proves hee, this?
A92925	And is not that agreable to Peter''s preaching the Iews and Paul''s to the Gentiles when they met in a City where were multitudes of both?
A92925	And lastly, who doubts but that Iudas in Hell hath a proper place of his own which no other damned soul hath?
A92925	And what is this Principle of mine?
A92925	And what stone is this?
A92925	And what was that?
A92925	And why?
A92925	And, Whenas hee asks mee, what lawfull Iurisdiction could remain to the Pope in England, where such and such laws had force?
A92925	And, how proves hee the Primitive Church exacted no more?
A92925	Are there no Negative Testimonies in the words?
A92925	Are these men fit to write Controversies; who can not, or will not, write common sence?
A92925	Are they contain''d in the Creed onely?
A92925	Are they demonstrative or rigorous Evidences?
A92925	Are they of faith, or opinions onely?
A92925	Are those doctrines their 39 Articles?
A92925	Are you at least united with them?
A92925	Are you wiser than they were in the Art of Governing as to this point?
A92925	Articles in that creed?
A92925	Articles, in which are many things( as hee wel knows) not found nor pretended to bee found in the Apostles creed?
A92925	Because they cry Lord, Lord?
A92925	But are not there near an hundred times that number, who have skirmish''t against us in particular Controversies?
A92925	But do not others call her so besides her own Advocates?
A92925	But how proves he that then they must have lost their reason?
A92925	But is not this merciless rigour?
A92925	But is this all the shame?
A92925	But is this all?
A92925	But perhaps he means they were Roman- Catholicks; if so, then let me ask, does he mean that they were of our Profession ere they renounc''t it?
A92925	But then it should be ask''d what necessity was there of exciting a greater care in S. Peter in particular?
A92925	But was there no design in alledging this testimony, or can he make it, though quite contrary to his tenet, serve his turn for nothing?
A92925	But what if I show the Doctor, that he hath contributed great mill- stones and huge logges towards the making this Wind- mill of his?
A92925	But what is the Ground of his exception?
A92925	But what needs any Iudge to determine or decide that which Dr. H. himself hath confest here in his Reply and Answer?
A92925	But what said the two appearances of the same Romanist?
A92925	But who is the Vmpire to decide this contradiction- quarrell?
A92925	But why good Dr.?
A92925	But why is he imagin''d the Penman of but at least the first part of Schism Disarm''d?
A92925	But, alas, how far are these two from being added together or conjoyned?
A92925	But, how dealt Dr. Stapleton with that good man M. Calv ● n?
A92925	But, how does hee clear himself of this shuffling nonsence?
A92925	But, if they bee necessary, then why does hee call them opinions onely, and that too of an inferiour nature?
A92925	But, is there no particularity in order to S. Peter?
A92925	But, what matters it what this statute sayes?
A92925	But, why is hee, in these his endeavours to vindicate his Church from Schism, so backwards to clear this concerning point?
A92925	Can any man in reason imagin I was ignorant that such was their tenet, since I impugn it in this present controversy, as Schismatical?
A92925	Can not one be a Bishop, but he must sit in a council before his betters?
A92925	Can that bee necessary to bee held or known, which hath no necessary Grounds to make it either held or known?
A92925	Can there bee greater abuses objected than these in your Grounds?
A92925	Did I say S. Peter was an Arch- bishop and the other two his suffragans?
A92925	Did ever man''s Reason run counter in this manner, or his insincerity so resolutely persist never to acknowledge any lapse?
A92925	Did they ever make laws to renounce and abrogate the Popes Authority, and define absolutely against essentiall right?
A92925	Do Duellers( if their quarrell be serious) use to spare their enemy, and not hurt him in that place where they see him unguarded?
A92925	Do not truth and certainty involve essentially in their notions an oppositenes and contrarietie to falshood& error?
A92925	Do not you know us?
A92925	Do the whole multitude of beleevers hold the bridle& govern themselves?
A92925	Do you go about to show that I put not down the Authors words aright, but mangledly& corruptly to my onely& best advantage, as your custome is?
A92925	Doe not our eyes and the experience of the whole world testifie this to be so?
A92925	Does it prove that the Authour of this welsh manuscript was worth a straw?
A92925	Does it then follow, from a Bishops being Head of the Priests in his Diocese, that there is no degree of Authority Superiour to his?
A92925	Does not all the world see that the pretended Church of England stands now otherwise in order to the Church of Rome, than it did in H. the 7ths dayes?
A92925	Does not common sence inform us that in this cause each City is a particular, that is, one compleat self bounded Common- wealth?
A92925	Does not true signifie not- false?
A92925	Does such a trifler deserve a Reply?
A92925	Eastern Bishops, were gone, ere this Canon,( which is the third in that Council) was made?
A92925	For how can a proof conclude evidently unles the inference be necessary?
A92925	For how can one separate from the whole Church, unless he separate both from his Superiours and equals too?
A92925	For how should conscience be inreressed to defend positions held upon no better ground, with any eagernesse, unlesse reason be interessed first?
A92925	For otherwise to what purpose was it to make an interrogation concerning a greater degree of love?
A92925	For what Principles have they to character a true beleever?
A92925	For what hurt is it to S. Peter''s Headship among the Apostles, if some went one way, some another, to preach?
A92925	For what would he infer hence?
A92925	For what?
A92925	For whether is greater, he that sitteth at meat or he that serveth?
A92925	For why may not we forsake the Churche''s Communion, if she hath no power to bind to unity in Faith which makes us one of hers?
A92925	For, how can any man be bound in reason to show that thing sounding in his behalf, upon which neither he nor his cause relies?
A92925	For, of whom should we imagin in reason such a question was ask''t, but of such persons?
A92925	For, why should any break Church- Communion as long as hee can keep it with conscience?
A92925	Fourthly, what a miserable weaknesse is it to quote this Father against me for using harsh language, who himself uses far harsher?
A92925	Good: did not Paul and Titus do the same in other places, were they therefore equall in Authority?
A92925	Grant it, who ever affirmed that Fundamentals could be false?
A92925	Grant it: what is this to our purpose?
A92925	Grant the inference, shown lately to be nothing worth, whas tenet of ours does his conclusion contradict?
A92925	Grant this too, what follows hence against the Pope''s Authory?
A92925	Had he( meaning S. Peter) any Iurisdiction over the Churches of Asia?
A92925	Had not the King the sword in his own hands?
A92925	Had not the secular Governours the sword in their hand?
A92925	Hath not each Catholike Bishop the same now a dayes over his private Diocese, and yet remains subject to the head of God''s Church notwithstanding?
A92925	Hath not this Dr. of Divinity a strange reach of reason, who can conclude men equall in Authority because he finds their names in the same place?
A92925	He was asked there,( and I ask him here again) why he omitted Schism against the Head of God''s Church?
A92925	Hee asks how I know S r H. found no other Antiquities in it?
A92925	Hee asks, if this bee the language of the Roman Schools?
A92925	Hee replies: what then were Watham and Heath,& c. all Protestants?
A92925	His Grounds?
A92925	How came hee then to take notice of this toy?
A92925	How can this stand with his Principles, who acknowledges ours a true Church, that is, not hereticall?
A92925	How come then the words 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 to signify principall place?
A92925	How comes this then to be a falsification when not one word is shown to be falsify''d?
A92925	How is it possible then a man indued with the common light of reason can hold a thing true and yet not hold it''s opposite false?
A92925	How much more credit were it to lose a bad cause by speaking out candidly, than to strive to maintain it by such pittiful shifts?
A92925	How my Ld of Derry digresses from a Papall Authority to a Patriarchall; that is from t?
A92925	How shall wee know they serve the same Lord?
A92925	How then follows it, that they have changed Christ''s doctrine by addition, who hold more points than are in that creed of the Apostles?
A92925	How then was it so proper for à Collection of Ecclesiasticall Councils?
A92925	How then, my Lord?
A92925	How would you take it if one should spit in your face, and justify the affront because his breath is sweet?
A92925	I answer whether they blew their noses or no it matters not; but, did they renounce the Pope''s Authority as Head of the Church?
A92925	I answer, grant it; what follows hence?
A92925	I ask are they bound or no to believe the Church, when they have but probability to the contrary?
A92925	I ask, are they necessary or no?
A92925	I ask, can that whole multitude consent in a palpable errour in things visible, or no?
A92925	I ask, did hee measure the Land, and number the saxons?
A92925	I ask, has hee read the British laws in those times?
A92925	I ask, have they any influence or efficacitie at all upon the conclusion or thing they are brought for, or no?
A92925	I ask, was not my answer pertinent to his words, the Governours might erre, which was my onely business at that time?
A92925	I ask, what kinde of things are their thirty nine Articles?
A92925	I ask; what is this to the pretence that their solemne departure was found v. 29. which hee cited for it?
A92925	IN MALA CAVSA NON possunt aliter; at malam causam quis coëgit eos habere?
A92925	If he startle at this, and demand by what means I can give him such an assurance?
A92925	If it do, produce it; if not, why do you alledge this more experience?
A92925	If not( as your eyes witnes''t is not) then how are you their Brothers or of their community?
A92925	If not, how are you then of one community or Brotherhood as Governed?
A92925	If not, how does hee know, or how can hee affirm this?
A92925	If not, where is the Vnity or common Headship of the whole, Church?
A92925	If the Pope pretend onely to be a Primate or Patriarch,& c. What If he be?
A92925	If they bee not necessary, why does hee seem to grant they are, by saying onely that they are not so necessary?
A92925	If they can, what means that grumbling parenthesis of the maior part, and to what end or purpose was it brought, since all might erre?
A92925	If this were his sole intent there, then why did himself professedly go about to evidence, p. 70. l. 4. what he tells us here needs no evidencing?
A92925	In Answer: does hee say, hee could not build on another''s foundation, or, as Dr. H. expresses it Reply p. 56. had not right to doe it?
A92925	In the name of wonder where shall we look for Dr. H''s proofs?
A92925	Is Brittain at least?
A92925	Is England named in the Council of Ephesus, which exempted Cyprus from the Patriarch of Antioch?
A92925	Is it a greater obstinacy to deny a Governour taxes, than to rebell absolutely against him?
A92925	Is it any wrong to them, or foule play in S. W. to affirm that Dr. H. and his Friends will not speak a contradiction?
A92925	Is it not of faith with them, that there is such a thing as God''s words; though it bee not in that creed?
A92925	Is it possible Mr. H. must be continually obliged by his cause to such affected insincerity, as still to counterfeit the mistake of the question?
A92925	Is it possible Mr. H. should think his Reader so silly, as to take such ridiculous tergiversations for a sufficient Answer?
A92925	Is it possible one should trip so often in running over a litle leaf of paper almost as intelligible as legible?
A92925	Is it private reason?
A92925	Is it the private Spirit?
A92925	Is it the true sence of it?
A92925	Is it to acknowledge the letter of the Scripture sufficient?
A92925	Is not Schism Disarm''d all the same style, or is it at all like the style of the Catholick Gentleman''s Letter?
A92925	Is not he that sitteth at meat?
A92925	Is not the Ground of all faith a necessary point?
A92925	Is not this Dr. a great wit to bring such unauthoriz''d& unlikely trifles for his excuse?
A92925	Is not this a fine upshot of such an elaborate answer?
A92925	Is not this a gallant disputant?
A92925	Is not this a rare disputant?
A92925	Is not this a solid man?
A92925	Is not this a worthy similitude?
A92925	Is not this an undaunted Adversary, who dares aduenture to come into the lists of disputation, armed onely with such Bull- rushes as these?
A92925	Is not this as evident, as that the sun shines; and may it not, with equall modesty, bee den''yd that there ever was such a man as K. H. the 8th?
A92925	Is not this excellent?
A92925	Is not this handsom?
A92925	Is not this neat?
A92925	Is not this strange Logick?
A92925	Is there a greater misery then to stand trifling with such a brabbler?
A92925	Is there any easier deference than to for goe a probability upon her contrary affirmation?
A92925	Is there any orderly common ty of Government obliging this Head to correspend with the other Head?
A92925	Is this a sober discourse, which falls reelingly to the Ground of it self, when none pushes it?
A92925	Is this a sufficient Plea for your breaking God''s Church?
A92925	Is this man fit to have the charge of souls, who professes to set more by his temporal than their eternal felicity?
A92925	Knot or I talk of Infallibility in things unnecessary?
A92925	Lastly, he asks, upon this occasion, what contradictories may not this wonder- working faculty of S. W''s reconcile?
A92925	Lastly, this being then his solely- reliedon proof, after what a strange manner he manages it?
A92925	Lastly, what means his inference of his being clearly superiour in that council?
A92925	Let another take his office?
A92925	Make an Heretike speak out( saith S. Augustin) and you have h ● lf- confuted him But, what reason gives hee why hee disapproves of my advise?
A92925	Must consent of fathers?
A92925	Must not he be a very wise man, who sticks not, first to build upon, next to vindicate so wise an Authority?
A92925	Must not hee now bee very quarelsome, who can wrangle with such an innocent and plain truth?
A92925	Must the common doctrine of the universall Church interpret it?
A92925	My question was whether they could erre, and conspire to tell an open ly in a thing visible as the Sun at noon- day?
A92925	Needs any mory answer be given to particulars which one yeelds to, than to say he grants them?
A92925	Next, I would ask him, what means the word 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉, this?
A92925	Next, hee sayes, it may become hereticall or Mahumetan?
A92925	Next, it was ask''t him why S. Peter could not be head of the Church but God must needs watch all occasions to manifest it by a particular miracles?
A92925	No, my Lord, I styl''d the Pope''s office, the Bridle; do bridles use to ride upon horses?
A92925	Not objected?
A92925	Now how can any man in reason imagine I should not mention his greatest faults, that is, not use harsh words?
A92925	Now what reply attempts Dr. H. against an objection which enervates all the whole Authority he relies on& shows him baffled in his own testimonies?
A92925	Now who sees not that an humble desire, that he would not doe it easily, intimates or supposes he had a power to doe it absolutely?
A92925	Now, then, I would ask, if this be so, how many Iews S. Paul might convert& govern, and how many S. Peter?
A92925	Now, what does Mr. H?
A92925	Now, what excuse brings the Bishop for this fundamentall shuffling, importing no less than the avoiding the whole question?
A92925	Occulta hic oritur quaestio, Quid igitur?
A92925	Or how does hee prove the Land must necessarily bee peopled, as fully as before, immediately after a Conquest so universall and cruell?
A92925	Or was it for this opinion of the Pope above the Council, and others of this strain?
A92925	Or what novelty is it that persons of equall Authority should doe things by common consent?
A92925	Or, do some Governors onely hold the bridle& weild by it the multitude of beleevers?
A92925	Or, will it bee deem''d by any indifferent man a competent proof against true faith, to say, that such and such hereticks deny''d it?
A92925	Possum- ne ego ex te exculpere hoc verum?
A92925	Pray does S r H. neglect all passages which are not of this grave nature?
A92925	Reader, canst thou imagin a greater blasphemy?
A92925	Reply, had he ever a particular Commission given him, correspondent to the particularizing promise, but here?
A92925	Secondly, hee asks, how does it appear that the British Bishops did assent to that Canon?
A92925	Secondly, hee tells us, our Ancestours did not stupidly sit still and blow their noses, when they saw themselves thus abused?
A92925	Secondly, if they were Protestants, hee demands, of which sect they were?
A92925	Sixthly, grant all those Abuses had been true; was there no other remedy but division?
A92925	The generall words of the father signify nothing to your purpose; unles they bee apply''d to your party: and who makes the application?
A92925	The most frantick Enthusiasts then have an equall pretence?
A92925	These are our manifest and undeniable proofs: what arguments does hee hring to blinde the Evidences?
A92925	These are the points between us; what say you to these?
A92925	Thirdly is it such news that Authors should be of severall opinions?
A92925	This is my present charge against him, consisting of these foure branches?
A92925	Vnder that of Hereticks?
A92925	Was ever man so ignorant of the common laws of disputing?
A92925	Was ever such an Answer contriu''d?
A92925	Was ever such an explication heard of?
A92925	Was ever such frivolous stuff heard of?
A92925	Was this power it self thus cast out before?
A92925	Was this the ordinary Government of the Primitive Church?
A92925	Well, my L d, are you and they both joyntly under the Government of those Patriarchs, or any other common Government?
A92925	Were not this a wise and edifying Sermon?
A92925	What Nations were these?
A92925	What Symptomes are these, and of what?
A92925	What a mysterious piece of sence is here?
A92925	What a piece of wit is here?
A92925	What a wise task it was to consult all the multitude of Grammars extant for such a trifle, which was just at his nose?
A92925	What becomes then of good S. Iohn Baptist, who called the ill- prepared Iews a generation of vipers?
A92925	What can be more expresse and full?
A92925	What could I expect other?
A92925	What dare not I, and do not I affirm?
A92925	What does Mr. H?
A92925	What does this Dr. of Divinity?
A92925	What follows in his 25. page is onely his own sayings?
A92925	What insuperable difficulties the Bp''s sooth- saying fancy proposes?
A92925	What is this to the Question whether these words[ the Papacy as such, as it is now maintain''d by many] cohere in sence or no?
A92925	What man in his wits ever pretended it or imagin''d, but that the Apostles might count mony wrong, or be mistaken in knowing what a clock it was?
A92925	What means hee by the Eastern Bishops?
A92925	What means this Dr. by this instance?
A92925	What need three testimonies, strung together, to shew one restrictive word?
A92925	What then?
A92925	What then?
A92925	What then?
A92925	What?
A92925	Whence, or from what Authority?
A92925	Where then is your Brother hood?
A92925	Where''s the difference?
A92925	Whereas I onely ask''t him why he did affirm it without knowing it?
A92925	Whether could any other Apostle by any power given him by Christ countermand or interpose in them?
A92925	Which shows now the greater charity?
A92925	Whither away my Lord?
A92925	Who for bids them to go to visit the sick with them, or such like religious duties?
A92925	Who knows not likewise that they stand accused by us of the fact of renouncing an Authority far higher than Patriarchall?
A92925	Whom do you impugn then?
A92925	Why so, my L d?
A92925	Why?
A92925	Why?
A92925	Will any man endeavour to turn one out of possession lawfully, without a plea, or produce a plea without either any motive or reason in it?
A92925	Will he say it is an usurpation?
A92925	Will hee have mee reckon up again the exceptions against it?
A92925	Will hee say,''t is that of the secular power being Head of the Church, or that of Bishops?
A92925	Will less serve than such proofs to iustify such a separation?
A92925	Would not Supreme Bishop or Governour have served, without being thus unfortunately witty in calling it a Summum genus?
A92925	Yet Dr. H. assures us that''t is in vain to speak of those to him; and why?
A92925	],[ Paris?
A92925	and a greater danger of disaccepting ours in them, than theirs in the Puritans?
A92925	and do not the Romanists excommunicate you and think you of another Religion because you hold it?
A92925	and how can reason be obliged to the serious, and vigorous patronage of what it felf knows certainly that it knows not whether it be true or no?
A92925	and is not this time extoll''d as that in which the Reformation in this point began?
A92925	and what a miserable life does he lead in turning over leaves daily to so litle purpose?
A92925	and, if it does not, what is it more then Dr. H''s own saying?
A92925	and, why?
A92925	as not such?
A92925	asks us who must put the case, or state the question?
A92925	because they believe them not I ask, had they a demonstration they were false?
A92925	can not one be so without being particular Bishop of each see in the world?
A92925	could not he be Bishop there and speak last both, without giving the sentence?
A92925	did I add or change any title in favour of it?
A92925	did it not ly in his power to right himself as hee ● isted, and to admit those pretended eneroachments onely so far as hee thought iust and fitting?
A92925	did it not ly in their power to chuse whether they would admit or no things destructive to their Rights?
A92925	does to draw of his Readers from the point in hand?
A92925	for maintaining the substance of the Pope''s Authority held by all?
A92925	himself: and upon what Grounds?
A92925	how does this vindicate the Church of England or take of my exception?
A92925	how then appears it from the words that this was onely an exortation?
A92925	how then, and with what face can you pretend I falsify''d it?
A92925	if he did not, how can he affirm it, or alledge this for his excuse?
A92925	if not, how can it possibly signifie the Gentile part onely, for which hee produced it?
A92925	if not, where is their submission of their judgements, where is their believing the Church?
A92925	is it of little concernment to examin whether the Grounds bee sufficient or no?
A92925	is there not a palbable difference put between the pretended Authorities of imposing points to be held, in us and them?
A92925	let us see between whom this all- Communion was broke; between two Churches; and by whom?
A92925	make any advantage of it?
A92925	more than these?
A92925	nay did I add, detract, or change the least particle how unconcerning soever, or do you goe about to show any such thing?
A92925	nay was it not possible this might have been don even to the unbeleevers themselves?
A92925	or because they call him Lord?
A92925	or can all hold what some do not hold?
A92925	or can not a Negative testimony testify a Negative point without necessarily recurring to solve Affirmatives?
A92925	or did your Lp ever meet a bridle on horsback?
A92925	or does he mean perhaps that they remain''d Catholicks after the renouncing it?
A92925	or how he could know it having noe ground to know it?
A92925	or how is England visibly ▪ united to it, vnder this notion?
A92925	or is it, though thus advantageous to the whole Church, to be rejected because of the abuses of particular persons?
A92925	or is this the point disputed between Catholicks and Protestants?
A92925	or the Papacy with super additions?
A92925	or to what end do you huddle together those pretended extravagancies for your vindication?
A92925	or was it a friendly part to involve his Friends in his own wise predicament?
A92925	or was not the word pasce spoken imperatively by a Master to his servant as apt to signify a Commission as the words, Goe teach all Nations, were?
A92925	or what hinders her from doubting, if she sees she may be wrong?
A92925	or why he could not be chief of the Apostles without having a greater tongue of fire?
A92925	or, is it an undeniable Principle that you ought to endanger your soul where you grant there is no necessity?
A92925	or, shall wee have any for the future?
A92925	or, what relation hath the pointing out to us such a word to the inferring a conclusion from three testimonies?
A92925	our question is about the limitation of Iurisdiction, what serve his testimonies for, or what do they there unles they can prove that?
A92925	replies: yes, well enough?
A92925	that S. Peter& S. Paul were distinct Bishops there also?
A92925	that is, that those many Cities are more ones, that is, many Cōmon- wealths?
A92925	that is, was it not in actuall force till and at this time?
A92925	the Catholicks, or the Arians?
A92925	till Constantine''s time?
A92925	unless they be willing to submit their private opinions to her Authority, how can they be said to believe her at all?
A92925	was ever common sence so abus''d?
A92925	was it not in Peter''s power to elect him?
A92925	was this single Abbot either pretended to bee a Council, or these words of his some authentick act of a Council?
A92925	were there noe worthier persons present, or did the thing to be concluded onely concern his see, or indeed did it concern it at all?
A92925	what Logick can conclude such an Act pardonable by such a Plea?
A92925	what does he?
A92925	what faith is to bee given, to the most formall bargain made with such Copes- masters of testimonies?
A92925	what means then this laying out my words in such a forme?
A92925	what need you ask that question?
A92925	what saies hee to this?
A92925	what then?
A92925	what weaker then than to think they were separated from the Church for oppositing those more rigorous pretences?
A92925	where is there any supreme Governour, or Governours to whom all are bound to submit, and conform themselves in the common concerns of the Church?
A92925	where is your order?
A92925	why do you instead of thus doing your duty, stand asking me the same question over again?
A92925	would he have it a parenthesis or no?
A59222	''T is this Light, I say, we would be at; Why is it so shy to shew its Face?
A59222	*[ In doing this we do not at all relinquish our Reason, but follow and exercise it?
A59222	*[ When w ● enquire( says he) What is the Rule of Christian Faith?
A59222	2 ly, Why must J. S. be the man?
A59222	Above all, does he not all along declare his abhorrence of finding out Faith in Scripture''s Letter by private Judgments, which is the Drs Position?
A59222	Again, Does he mean in point of True Reason inform''d by the best Maxims to direct and establish it?
A59222	Again, do we here meddle with its Dimensions or how much is of Faith, as he did when he spoke of his Rule?
A59222	Again, how will he satisfy Doubters, and convince acute Opposers and Adversaries what is the true Doctrin of Christ?
A59222	Again, what Nonsense does he make us speak by omitting these words?
A59222	Again, what did his Gospel contain?
A59222	Again, what mean you by our proving her free from Errour?
A59222	Again, what means Satisfaction of Mind?
A59222	Again, what means he by[ Wee of the Church of England?]
A59222	Again, what means he when he says, Testimony is not an Intrinsicall Ground?
A59222	Again,''t is ask''t if it be an Infallible Rule?
A59222	All this while, What is this to the Tradition we assert, which begun afterwards?
A59222	And I ask, whether the Matter under Consideration be the Object of Naturall Reason, or no?
A59222	And asks briskly, whether he or I know best?
A59222	And by what Rule?
A59222	And can any thing excuse You from being thus faulty, but Ignorance of our Tenet?
A59222	And can he seriously think that a man who casts it up False, does not decline, while he thus mistakes, from Arithmetical Rules?
A59222	And can there be any thing more Evident?
A59222	And could not these Learned men see a thing manifest to Sense and Experience?
A59222	And did ever any of us pretend, that Tradition was to bring down such particulars?
A59222	And do not you see this is already prov''d to your Hand?
A59222	And does he in his great Learning think the Church is to Own, or prescribe every one their particular Methods of handling Controversy?
A59222	And does not his Adversary confess it too?
A59222	And how can you, of all Men, suppose he is?
A59222	And how shall this Quarrel be decided?
A59222	And if that can be erroneous, may not all Christian Faith by your Principles be perhaps a company of Lying Stories?
A59222	And if we must alledge it, are we not oblig''d, as Disputants, to bring such Arguments, to prove that Authority Certain, as do conclude that Point?
A59222	And is it come now to signify theirs simply as Christians, or as conjoyn''d with all the rest?
A59222	And is not such a thing Evident by its own light, or out of the very Terms, that is, self- evident?
A59222	And is not this a rare Answer?
A59222	And is not this to bring us to Divine Faith, if we prove it to be His Doctrine?
A59222	And is not this to cry, Hail fellow, well met?
A59222	And is this the Faith Christians are to be sav''d by?
A59222	And must I. S. still be of the Drs Sentiment, tho''he in all occasions contradicts it, disputes against it, and baffles it?
A59222	And now, I beseech you, Learned Sir, Where''s the Polagianism?
A59222	And perhaps I can shew him twenty more; but, still, what''s this to the Point?
A59222	And pray what more direct or more full Answer can there be to an Argument, than to deny the Premises?
A59222	And pray where does it appear that Mr. G. is oblig''d not to deny that the Greek Church has err''d in matters of Faith?
A59222	And so the Way to know the Doctrin of Christ and his Apostles, is it not the Means which he who has us''d knows that Doctrin?
A59222	And that we do not confess they are Fallible, or may deceive us, as you grant of your Interpretations of Scripture, which ground your Belief?
A59222	And that''t is because a Point is Indivisible?
A59222	And then what becomes of the Council of Trent?
A59222	And there may be vanity too in our Case, for ought I know: But where shall it be lodg''d?
A59222	And was not the Question plainly of the Certainty of this, and of All this more?
A59222	And were those men Followers of Tradition who despis''d it?
A59222	And what Eyes have you who perceive not that therefore it can not be a sure way?
A59222	And what do you more than e''en leave them to draw Cuts, and venture their Souls as handy- dandy shall decide, for you or Mr. G.?
A59222	And what is this but Pelagianism?
A59222	And what reason have you to desire it?
A59222	And what says his Instance?
A59222	And what''s he the better for Certainty of This, if still he remains uncertain of all the particular Articles he is to believe by it?
A59222	And who shall see through the Mists which these Disputes will raise?
A59222	And why is he not satisfy''d?
A59222	And why not a word of Reply to my Plain Reasons why he ought to have done both these?
A59222	And why should not the Proposer fear, as himself did here, lest by changing his words, as he did enormously, he should change his Sense too?
A59222	And will any Notwithstanding unprove it again?
A59222	And will not the Happiness or Misery of their Souls for ever depend on that Account?
A59222	And will you assume that the Greek Church errs, who believe she does not?
A59222	And would you have what you say pass for an Answer?
A59222	And your Answer that They are?
A59222	And, I may, I hope, ask another Question; Could any Man but Dr St. put such a Gull upon his Adversary and the Reader too?
A59222	And, Might you not with as much reason say the same, if one should maintain the Absolute Certainty of our Senses, which is one of those Preliminaries?
A59222	And, does he think I have nothing else to do but to stand Rectifying still what he all along takes such Care and Pains to put into Disorder?
A59222	And, how did the Dr. acquit himself, and perform this?
A59222	And, if so, why not with the same labour, and for the same Reasons, to bring it down from the very Beginning of the Church?
A59222	And, pray, who''s the wiser for such an Answer?
A59222	And, since''t is Evident they must, we would know next how many of them are to arrive at any Faith at all?
A59222	And, was this All he said?
A59222	And, were this so, then, to what end were Catechisms, Sermons and Controversies about such subjects?
A59222	Are Protestants and Christians then Convertible Terms or Synonyma''s?
A59222	Are all the* Principles Dr. St. laid?
A59222	Are not the Socinians as well satisfy''d in mind that Christ is not God, as the Dr. is that he is God?
A59222	Are not these all presuppos''d to his Rule?
A59222	Are the Ten Commandments, which are plain honest Nature, of as Deep and Mysterious a Sense, as the high Points we speak of?
A59222	Are there not many sorts of Christians which are not Protestants?
A59222	Are these with him but Opinions?
A59222	Are they so hard to be understood, that Writing is not a clear Conveyer of God''s Sense in such Matters?
A59222	Are you a Socinian, an Arian, a Sabellian, an Eutychian,& c. or what are you?
A59222	Are you a whole, or a half, or a Quarter- nine- and- thirty- Article Man?
A59222	Are your Mysteries of Christian Faith such?
A59222	Argument than your Instance?
A59222	As every thing is true, and every thing clear; who now besides your self would have thought of an evasion from it?
A59222	As for the later, where were your thoughts, Sir, while you thus bad adieu to the plainest Rules of Discourse?
A59222	Ask him then, If Faith be Absolutely Certain by his Grounds?
A59222	Ask him what Points he accounts Necessary?
A59222	Be it what it will in it self, the Point is, How does it Build Faith in us?
A59222	Besides, how should they prove this Divine Assistance?
A59222	Besides, who can tell but this man is better stock''t with Dr. St''s Morall Qualifications and Inward Light than his Judges and Pastours are?
A59222	But could you not have afforded to inform us likewise by what he was satisfi''d?
A59222	But did she follow this Rule?
A59222	But his Reason was Nonplust, and his Fancy was over- heated, and this must plead his excuse: for what could he do better in such ill circumstances?
A59222	But how proves he that when we have found a Certain Authority we must not follow it and rely on it?
A59222	But if I take that word ill, how must I do to take it well?
A59222	But is he sure that I. S. contradicts himself?
A59222	But is it so much as an Argument ad hominem?
A59222	But is not your Tradition for Scripture Human Testimony too?
A59222	But let us see what you will make of it: What would you have prov''d next?
A59222	But our Point is how we shall know assuredly what is Christs Doctrin?
A59222	But pray what difference betwixt Heresie and Error in matter of Faith?
A59222	But pray, what express Scripture has your Sober Enquirer for his Power to make the Implicit Points Explicit?
A59222	But the Point is, Can you make good his Logick in this irregular Proceeding?
A59222	But the only Point is still, Are you absolutely- certain by your Grounds, that your Faith is indeed built on the Word of God?
A59222	But to let this pass, as you say, with your causelesly gleeking Reflections upon Scripture and Tradition, what say you to the Proof I bring?
A59222	But was Tradition follow''d, while they follow''d their Authority?
A59222	But was this pretence to a Secret Tradition a pretending to follow the Publick Tradition of the Church?
A59222	But what a shift is the Dr put to?
A59222	But what becomes of those who use not those Means?
A59222	But what becomes then( say you) of the Vulgar Latin Translation?
A59222	But what have we to do with any of your pretended Christian Churches, whether Eastern, or not- Eastern, Modern, or Antient; many or few?
A59222	But what if men differ about this Certain Authority wherein it lies, and how far it extends?
A59222	But what is it which you manifest?
A59222	But what needs more?
A59222	But what provision was made in the mean time against the mischief and Scandall?
A59222	But what says he to my discourse?
A59222	But what says that B. Apostle?
A59222	But what were my words that were so mirthful?
A59222	But what would I. S. do with such a man?
A59222	But what''s all this to the Point?
A59222	But what''s become of your Proof all this while?
A59222	But what''s this to our case?
A59222	But where''s his Sincerity?
A59222	But where''s this Proof, where''s this Truth all the while?
A59222	But who set the bounds of Reason?
A59222	But why are you so shy to quote the Pages or Paragraphs where we bring these absurd Proofs?
A59222	But why is this made a distinct Conclusion or disjoynted from the rest, whereas it was the most necessary and Essentiall part of our true Tenet?
A59222	But will not that follow which you say here will not?
A59222	But, What is this to our present business?
A59222	But, Why all this?
A59222	But, Why must they, or how can they pretend alike?
A59222	But, can any one think so excellent a Wit, as Yours, is justly reputed, should expose himself so manifestly, without some latent Design?
A59222	But, did the Antient Church, in reality, never know any thing of this way?
A59222	But, into what an unadvisedness does your Anger transport you, to run the Weapon through your own Side to do us a Mischief?
A59222	But, ought you not to be assur''d first that he did indeed deliver it?
A59222	But, the main Point is, while we are enquiring which the Way is which God has left, pray what have we to do with the Iudgments of men?
A59222	But, what a put off is this?
A59222	But, what would we have?
A59222	But, where lies the Jest?
A59222	But, where lyes the Quarrel?
A59222	But, why Presbyterians and Socinians?
A59222	But, why do I make such a Spitefull Reflexion on him as to call them His Christian Churches?
A59222	But, why should I think it needs no Proof against You; who, we see plainly, have interpreted your selves out of your Natural Sentiments?
A59222	But, why should I vex you with putting you upon manifest Impossibilities?
A59222	But, why so Cholerick?
A59222	By it''s meer Letter, descanted upon by private Iudgments, or, interpreted by the Church?
A59222	Can Tradition infallibly deliver contrary things?
A59222	Can a man be Absolutely Certain of a Falshood, because he apprehends that Falshood to be a Truth, or that a thing is so when''t is not so?
A59222	Can any man living make Sense of such stuff, or ever come at his Faith by such a Rule?
A59222	Can any thing be more Trifling?
A59222	Can he be truly said to Regulate himself by him, when he does not use his manner of speaking, meerly because he Professes and Declares he does it?
A59222	Can he deny this?
A59222	Can his apprehending it so make it so?
A59222	Can they add weight to the Divine Authority, or clear that to us which is already so plain by Scripture?
A59222	Can they make or unmake it?
A59222	Can they, or can they not?
A59222	Can this man do himself a greater prejudice, than by thus confessing, that he holds not Christian Faith, absolutely speaking, True?
A59222	Can you deny this?
A59222	Christian Faith is Divine, these Grounds and the Faith built on them is Human, being the Testimony of Men: Are these two the same Notion?
A59222	Could any man but this Gentleman undertake to combat a Proposition so formally, which is in Sense Identicall and Self- Evident?
A59222	Could any thing be clearer or more candid?
A59222	Did God''s Grace ever make a Conclusion follow which did not follow, or make the Terms cohere which were Incoherent?
A59222	Did I speak of the Epistle to the Hebrews?
A59222	Did any of them say that the Churche''s Tradition of a Doctrin, as Christs, was liable to Errour?
A59222	Did ever any man pretend that Tradition will keep men from any Possibility of Errour whether they follow it or no?
A59222	Did ever any mortal Man think or pretend that Tradition was an Article, or a Power, any more than that it was a Horse shoe?
A59222	Did he never reflect why a Tenet is Metaphorically call''d a Point?
A59222	Did not they all hold, that who taught any thing contrary to the Doctrin delivered down by the Church, was a Heretick?
A59222	Did our Saviour teach, and do Protestants believe no more, than that the Book so call''d is Scripture?
A59222	Did she not do her best in the present Circumstances?
A59222	Did the Apostles when they went to convert the world go with Books in their hands, or Words in their Mouths?
A59222	Did the Dr. or any man living hear any Mortal man when he is about to express his Certainty of a thing, say[ I am Fallibly Certain of it?]
A59222	Did the Testimony of the Christian Church tell them that Enthusiasm was Christ''s Doctrin?
A59222	Did they ever alledge, that the Tradition or Immediate Testimony of the Body of the Church, deliver''d down their Doctrin for Christ''s?
A59222	Did we ever press him to admit it blindly; the Point is, will he renounce his Reason when it tells him this Authority ought to be believ''d?
A59222	Did your self when you granted the Latin and Greek Churches follow''d Tradition, intend to signify that they follow''d Articles and Powers?
A59222	Do I hinder you from shewing Protestants that They are Certain of their Faith?
A59222	Do either of us alledge Miracles, or any Arguments that Proves it to be such?
A59222	Do not many of your Congregation( and the like may be said of all Sects) sin often, and yet few or none of them desert their Faith once?
A59222	Do not these two consist well together?
A59222	Do not they all profess to resolve theit Faith( I mean their abominable Errours) into the written Word?
A59222	Do not they all strive to lay claim to the Letter of Scripture for their Rule, as well as you?
A59222	Do not your self use the same Method?
A59222	Do the Apostolical or succeeding Churches testify either of these?
A59222	Do their contrary Pretences hinder it from being seen whether the Deed be for Peter or Paul; or Tradition for Catholicks or Protestants?
A59222	Do we contend here they could follow no other?
A59222	Do you deny this?
A59222	Do you deny this?
A59222	Do you do any such matter?
A59222	Do you so much as go about it?
A59222	Do you take them for Snares, or Fences, and when for the one, and when for the other, and wherefore?
A59222	Does any of our School- Divines take the Words[ Rule of Faith] in this Sense?
A59222	Does he deny this, or shew my Discourse faulty by assigning any other that particularizes or distinguishes them?
A59222	Does he deny this?
A59222	Does he deny this?
A59222	Does he mean the Vniversality of Christians in the First Age, or any succeeding one?
A59222	Does he mean they were to Vnderstand what it was the Apostles taught?
A59222	Does he mean they were to examin whether the Apostles were Divinely- inspir''d or not?
A59222	Does he not cite my words here, that this Human Faith had by Tradition, leads us to what''s Divine?
A59222	Does he think''t is so with Truths and Falshoods?
A59222	Does he understand how to answer our many Arguments to prove it?
A59222	Does it follow so Naturally that Faith needs no Higher Grounds of Certainty, because J. S. writes unconstantly?
A59222	Does not he prove it to be as Evident as''t is that the same is the same with it self?
A59222	Does not the word[ their] signify theirs as distinct from all other sorts of Christians?
A59222	Does not this Metaphor look a little more Proper, and the Discourse upon it hang better together than his likening Scripture to a Purse?
A59222	Doth Mr. M. think our Faith is to be resolv''d into the Original Texts?
A59222	Every Clause?
A59222	Faith as''t is formally Divine has for its Grounds the Divine Authority ▪ But are we in our Controversy Examining it as''t is Formally Divine?
A59222	For let me ask you once more, Is not the Sense of Scripture your Faith?
A59222	For which way can an Inference be drawn from an Antecedent, in which it was not to be drawn?
A59222	For, pray, did Christ teach any Error?
A59222	For, pray, how many of these Books go to make up your Rule of Faith?
A59222	For, what can these words mean?
A59222	From what Antecedent is this Conclusion drawn?
A59222	Had not I then good reason to ask him if Christ was a meer Man, it falling in so Naturally?
A59222	Has Peter Twenty pounds in his Purse, because Paul can not prove he has not?
A59222	Has he it by Divine Revelation, or by Reason?
A59222	Have not I produc''t in my First Catholick Letter, p. 35. reasons enow to shew him how disputable this point is, none of which he so much as mentions?
A59222	He asks him smartly, what Infallible Ground is there for this Divine Faith, and where it fixes?
A59222	He asks how I know it?
A59222	He asks, did Christ teach any Errours?
A59222	He discourses against Tradition as''t is Practical; but has he said any thing against it as''t is Oral?
A59222	He must learn the Sense of Scripture by them, and yet trust himself interpreting Scripture, not them, for the Sense of it?
A59222	He read it, and at my request made his Exceptions; which being clear''d by me, he askt me why I did not Print it?
A59222	He understands?
A59222	How Plausibly and smoothly this Discourse runs, and how shrewdly it seems to conclude?
A59222	How can you without destroying the Certainty of your own Rule[ Scripture] which depends upon it, and withal contradicting your self?
A59222	How does it appear that the Church of Rome is Infallible in the sense and meaning of Tradition?
A59222	How often must it be repeated that you have as yet produc''t no Rule at all for your Faith?
A59222	How smart and victorious this looks?
A59222	How will he prove it?
A59222	How?
A59222	How?
A59222	How?
A59222	How?
A59222	I ask next, did Mr. T. use all these means in a doubtful Point, to compass a rational satisfaction?
A59222	I ask you then, what do you mean by those words[ necessary for Salvation] which mince the matter so warily?
A59222	I ask, with the good leave of his Jest, Does he think Christ and his Apostles taught any unnecessary Points?
A59222	I take my Ruler, and draw a Line by it; Does the Straightness or Crookedness of this Line depend upon my Vnderstanding?
A59222	I would gladly know if that point be contain''d in those Books?
A59222	If Tradition was not follow''d but deserted when men were led by False Teachers, what''s this to us?
A59222	If for want of a firm Ground, Faith hap to be False?
A59222	If it did?
A59222	If it was the same Sense, why did he not speak to it directly in the Proposers words?
A59222	If not; why did he use such cautious diminishing expressions, and instead of All their Doctrin, put, All matters necessary to our Salvation?
A59222	If so, how proves he This at least?
A59222	If the Chapter or Verse he cites be not True Scripture, or if any materiall Word in the Verse be alter''d can he securely build his Faith on it?
A59222	If the Church may explain the sense and meaning of Tradition; that is, of the Method of conveying down Christs Doctrin?
A59222	If they can err in matters necessary to Salvation, then doubtless many will err, and how can errour Save them?
A59222	If they do not, what are they good for in a Controversy, or what signifies a Proof that Concludes nothing?
A59222	If you demand how the Roman Church came by this knowledge of making Implicit Points Explicit?
A59222	In pursuance of this new Method of Proving and Confuting He asks again, How comes Mr. S. to know we are not Certain when we say we are?
A59222	In the mean time let us ask you, how you come to be thus Certain of it?
A59222	In the mean time why has not Mr. G. done already as much as should be done?
A59222	In these words of yours( p. 7)[ As to the Rule of our Faith] give me leave to reflect on the word[ OVR,] and thence to ask you, who are YOV?
A59222	Intrinsicall Ground?
A59222	Is Certainty of this more, and Certainty of this Book all one?
A59222	Is Faith ever a jot more Certain or True because some may be Satisfy''d it is?
A59222	Is all his Discourse at the Conference with Mr. G?
A59222	Is any thing in the world capable to be known?
A59222	Is he Sure they can not err as to what''s necessary to their Salvation?
A59222	Is here any occasion of fine sport?
A59222	Is it Pelagianism to say, we must use our Reason to come to Faith; or, do you pretend all the World must be the worst of Phanaticks, and use none?
A59222	Is it meerly built on his Apprehension or Thinking it so?
A59222	Is it not Confest and Suppos''d by both Parties that the Faith Taught at first was Divine; and are we to Examin what''s Confest and Granted?
A59222	Is it not a Madness to say, a Rule will direct them Right that do not Follow it?
A59222	Is it not agreed on between us, that Christ is God, and his Doctrine Divine?
A59222	Is it not equally blamable to Falsify your Adversaries Tenet perpetually, as''t is to falsify his Words?
A59222	Is it not that Passage that he who has past it, finds himself at that Place?
A59222	Is it possible to deform Tradition more untowardly, or wrest it into more misconstructions than has been done already?
A59222	Is not this a special way of Regulating himself by the Rule of Justice, and a most Cheap way for a Man to pay debts without disbursing a farthing?
A59222	Is not this mighty Learned?
A59222	Is not this pleasant?
A59222	Is not this to make a man Absolutely Certain of he knows not what?
A59222	Is shall know and may know all one?
A59222	Is that an Answer?
A59222	Is the holding the Godhead of Christ, and that God dy''d to save and redeem Mankind, a Matter Necessary to Salvation?
A59222	Is there any possible way to ascertain this, but by our Doctrin- Rule?
A59222	Is there no more requisit to a Rule, but to be the Word of God?
A59222	Is this Solid Answering or plain Prevaricating?
A59222	Is this Tradition a Rule of Faith distinct from Scripture?
A59222	Is your sober Enquirer Bound to use these means for his satisfaction in doubtful Points, or not?
A59222	Lastly, does his Friend only tell you''t is self- evident?
A59222	Lastly, why is not an Extrinsicall Ground or Testimony prov''d to be such by Intrinsicall Reasons sufficient in our case?
A59222	Lastly, why must his Providence be confin''d to only Translaters and Transcribers?
A59222	May he not with as good Sense say that Two and Three do not make Five?
A59222	Means he then''t is not a Proper Medium to prove Christ''s Faith deriv''d to us who live now?
A59222	Miss tho''they follow it?
A59222	Most Excellent?
A59222	Must all Men necessarily be Scepticks who allow not his No- way of doing this, tho''they propose and Maintain a certain way that can do it?
A59222	Must my Memory be blam''d, when their Judgments are in fault?
A59222	Must we bid them rely on their Private Interpretations of Scripture?
A59222	Must we bring them the Publick Interpretation of it by the Church?
A59222	Must we produce such invisible things for open Proofs?
A59222	Must we then, at the first dash, alledge the Publick Interpretation of the Church Divinely assisted?
A59222	Must you be minded that an Arguer is to prove his Conclusion, and an Answerer to shew he does not, by assigning where and how he fails?
A59222	Must you be minded that the Business must be stopt before it come to the Conclusion, and that otherwise there is no speaking against it?
A59222	My last question shall be, Whether your sober Enquirers are not to come to their particular Faith, by this their particular Rule of Faith?
A59222	Nay, Thomas a Iesu, Azorius,& c. who were of the same Judgment?
A59222	Nay, do not they all alledge the same?
A59222	Nay, is it not worse, being less liable to discovery, and so more certainly and more perniciously Injurious?
A59222	Neither of them is his Concern: What does he then?
A59222	Never spare me, good Sir, nor balk your mirth for me if I give a just Occasion: But where lies the Jest?
A59222	Next he asks, Are all People Capable of this Certain Reason?
A59222	Next, he asks, what if the matter propos''d by this Certain Authority which I have found out by my Reason be very much against Reason?
A59222	No such matter: and the Accidental occasions of it''s writing at first, and it''s Acceptation afterwards, bar any such Pretences?
A59222	Nor Lastly, not to advert that even the Divinity of Faith depends, in some sort, on Naturall Means?
A59222	Notwithstanding?
A59222	Of what Account do you speak, I beseech you?
A59222	Onely I must note your forgetfulness, or what else may I call it?
A59222	Only those Dogmatical Points controverted from time to time between the Sons of the Church, and her Deserters; of which, and none but which, we speak?
A59222	Or are you to adhere to it as his, whether you are certain''t is his or no?
A59222	Or by what Means shall we come at it?
A59222	Or does he imagin the Thoughts of the Christian World could take a Walk of two or three Hundred years between Is and Is not?
A59222	Or does he show that all these may not fail if the Churches''s Care be set aside?
A59222	Or does he show that without the Care of the Church preserving the Letter Right all along, he can have any Such Certainty of the Letter?
A59222	Or does he think I meant that that single Epistle was half or three quarters of the Canon of Scripture?
A59222	Or does it depend on them to be or not be the Way he left, as they happen to be different?
A59222	Or durst they disgrace themselves by going about to avail themselves of such an open and Notorious Lye?
A59222	Or how does he make good his judgment of Discretion, or overthrow ours?
A59222	Or how is the Demonstration lost if many men err''d upon divers other accounts so none err''d while they follow''d Tradition?
A59222	Or how shews he that a seen Fallibility is able to beget Absolute Certainty?
A59222	Or is it enough to hold it was only a Man to whom they owe that highest Obligation to Love him?
A59222	Or is it not enough for our purpose when''t is confess''d on both sides that Christ''s Doctrine is Divine?
A59222	Or is it not possible to keep this roving Pen of his to any thing?
A59222	Or keep those from Errour who took a Way, that, for any thing he has prov''d to the contrary, facilitated men to fall into it?
A59222	Or rather, would it not have preserv''d men from them, had nothing else been attended to but that Rule?
A59222	Or that All Christians have gone upon this Principle?
A59222	Or were those Words a jot less Sacred when it came from their Mouths, than when they put them in a Book?
A59222	Or what do you mean?
A59222	Or what''s her Teaching to the Immediate and Certain Light to know Christs Sense in those Main Articles?
A59222	Or where did we prove we follow''d this Rule only with iffs?
A59222	Or would she have condemn''d them had they spoke her thoughts or follow''d her Doctrin?
A59222	Or, How come I to stand in your way?
A59222	Or, Is this any thing to the Council of Trent, as you pretend?
A59222	Or, are not ten millions of Attesters as able to cause Absolute Certainty as Twenty?
A59222	Or, can not I use a plain word in the Context of my Discourse falling in naturally, because he had misus''d it unskillfully and inartificially?
A59222	Or, do you so much as pretend they do?
A59222	Or, ever the more Title to an Estate, because an Adversary may have the ill luck to be Non- suited?
A59222	Or, forfeit the Dignity of Pastours and Leaders, because they are not Infallible?
A59222	Or, that the Apostles did not instruct people in those Main Articles?
A59222	Or, will he recurr to Divine Assistances to keep Particular Persons from Errour, and yet deny them to the Church?
A59222	Our General Objection then against* your whole Paragraph is this, that you never apply your several What ifs?
A59222	Pray Sir, do You take my sence, or say what I do?
A59222	Pray Sir, what''s become of your Jest?
A59222	Pray be candid, and tell us, After a thing is plain in Scripture, are you to value a straw, what either Primitive Church, Creeds, or Fathers say?
A59222	Pray what ails this Argument?
A59222	Pray what assistance do you afford them to determin either way?
A59222	Pray, Sir, who sent you?
A59222	Pray, how comes Mr. G. to lye under an Obligation, from which Men of Reputation in his own Communion are exempt?
A59222	Pray, what Conscience is yours, if mine be bad when I say as you do?
A59222	Pray, what''s the Way to a Place?
A59222	Pray, when will that When of yours be?
A59222	Pray, which is more aukward?
A59222	Pray, who are or can be those some who take it and will not keep it?
A59222	Principle; in which You endeavour to establish Scripture to be a Rule?
A59222	Question, What Churches you accounted Christian Churches?
A59222	Shall we never have done with this ridiculous and palpable Nonsense?
A59222	Since, notwithstanding you have your Rule, you are still as far to seek as before in all a Rule should be good for?
A59222	Still he asks, Are not we Certain because some( that is, the Socinians) are not Certain?
A59222	T is ask''t, whether this Testimony assures us certainly the New Testament contains all the Divine Revelations?
A59222	That a Means will bring a man to his End, who does not use it?
A59222	That a Way will keep a man from Straying in his Journey who does not walk in it?
A59222	That is, will you affirm the same Virtue does not work the same Effect if the matter be capable?
A59222	The Apostles did Miracles to attest their Doctrin: Did St. Luke, do any to attest the True Sense of all he writ in those Points?
A59222	The Point is, how does he clear himself?
A59222	The Point still sticks: How can an indifferent man, seeking for Faith by your Rule, be satisfy''d They abuse it more than You?
A59222	The Proposer''s?
A59222	The Second Proposition is[ And if they follow this Rule they can never Err in Faith] what says he to this?
A59222	The best way, say you?
A59222	The case then between us being such plain sense, what says the Learned Dr to it?
A59222	This gives me occasion to ask you what becomes of Your Rule, and, consequently, of Your Faith all that while?
A59222	This he should have prov''d solidly and clearly: But, instead of proving it, he barely says it; and who will at this time of day believe his word?
A59222	This is the only Point, and therefore must only be omitted: what''s this to a Nurse''s Teaching to read?
A59222	This lay upon him to prove, and this with Absolute Certainty, if he would have Scripture an Intire Rule of his Faith; How proves he it?
A59222	To Christian Faith as''t is Divine?
A59222	To maintain that Christian Faith needs not to be Absolutely Certain?
A59222	To what end all Instructions, Conferences, and Explications of them by the Pastours?
A59222	To what imaginable purpose then was this frivolous distinction brought in?
A59222	To what purpose is it, to talk Sense to a man who is resolv''d to run still so wildly into Nonsense?
A59222	To what?
A59222	Was his Answer the same in Sense with the Question?
A59222	Was it Ambiguous?
A59222	Was it False?
A59222	Was the Position as it lay in the terms of the Proposer, true; and, so, to be granted?
A59222	Well, but did I say true, or no?
A59222	Well, but how came he off with that Task?
A59222	Well, but what are my* words?
A59222	What Reply made Dr. Tillotson?
A59222	What Shift has he then?
A59222	What a weakness is this, to suppose Miracles must be done for no other end, but that you may answer our Argument?
A59222	What absurd pretences not lay hold of, rather than be brought to this odious and dangerous thing call''d Proving?
A59222	What answers he to common Sense and to his own Experience too when he instructs others?
A59222	What answers he to this plain Evidence?
A59222	What answers he?
A59222	What are People the wiser now?
A59222	What do you call being wanting to themselves?
A59222	What do you talk then of erring for, and mistaking and abusing the Way?
A59222	What does he then?
A59222	What effect can this have upon those who do not yet hold that Tenet; and, consequently, how can this be a Proper Argument to convince them?
A59222	What have we to do with Opinions?
A59222	What if some Sons were so negligent as to take no care either to remember or teach what they had been taught by their Fathers?
A59222	What if some, through Ambition, Vain- Glory and Popularity, set a broach New Doctrines, and taught them for Apostolical Tradition?
A59222	What impertinent Brabbling is this?
A59222	What is''t then you call Misunderstanding a Rule?
A59222	What man in his senses ever said or thought it?
A59222	What may you mean by this?
A59222	What mean these dry Common words?
A59222	What means he, or how can he apply this to our Question?
A59222	What miserable Stuff is this?
A59222	What needed then this shuffling Paraphrase?
A59222	What new Stratagem must be invented then to avoid it?
A59222	What pityfull Trifling is this?
A59222	What reason has Mr. G. to prove it a second time?
A59222	What says he to this?
A59222	What says he to this?
A59222	What says the Dr now to this plain state of the Controversy?
A59222	What says the pleasant Dr to this?
A59222	What then is this Absolute Certainty?
A59222	What then?
A59222	What will this come to at last?
A59222	What wretched Shifts are these?
A59222	What''s become of his Sincerity and Morall Honesty, which he so profest to Love?
A59222	What''s your particular Rule?
A59222	What?
A59222	What?
A59222	When a Father believ''d what Christ taught him, and the Son what the Father believ''d, did not the Son too believe what Christ taught?
A59222	When a Truth is once prov''d, is it not prov''d, notwithstanding all Objections?
A59222	When that very[ Peradventure] hinders his Certainty from being Absolute or Perfect?
A59222	When will the day come, in which you will shew your Faith to be solidly- grounded on the Word of God?
A59222	Where will you pitch when you light?
A59222	Where your Conscience?
A59222	Where''s your Love of Moral Honesty?
A59222	Where''s your Sincerity?
A59222	Which once put, what can all the other, esteem''d by you but Human Authorities, serve for?
A59222	Who ever question''d that God was Living or Infallible; or that he has left us an Infallible Word?
A59222	Who ever said it?
A59222	Whose Sense?
A59222	Why conceal''d he the true Meaning of the word[ Traditionary] given by us, but took it purposely in another Sense, and then rally''d upon it?
A59222	Why did I not say that All Christians are Traditionary?
A59222	Why did he not Instance in the Trinity, the Godhead of Christ and such like, which and only which we say are Obscure?
A59222	Why did he not grant it then?
A59222	Why does he not Suspend?
A59222	Why does he not confute all my Book by that Method?
A59222	Why is he then so high against me for exposing him, when those of the Church of England have already expos''d him more than I have done?
A59222	Why is it then ridiculous to profess we do this?
A59222	Why must it be quite forgotten then, and buried in silence, that they taught any thing by word of mouth or preacht the Gospel publickly?
A59222	Why no Reply to my Confutation of his smartest or rather Only Argument to prove Scripture a Rule, given by me particularly to every Branch of it?
A59222	Why not a word in Confutation of an Infallible Iudge, as that Point is stated by me?
A59222	Why not a word of Answer to my Discourse shewing Absolute Certainty& Infallibility to be the same?
A59222	Why nothing to justify that his Assent of Faith may not be False, and so, no Faith?
A59222	Why nothing to the unavoidable force of our Argument, manifesting it to be Self- evident that Tradition is a Certain Rule?
A59222	Why quote you not the page where we say this?
A59222	Why should not his Sober Enquirers trust the Church rather than themselves; and why no Answer to the Reasons why they should?
A59222	Why such wincing and kicking?
A59222	Why, First, he says, If by Fallible Certainty I mean this and that,& c. I mean?
A59222	Why, I said, Suppose Mr. G. could not prove Protestants are certain, are they therefore certain?
A59222	Why, do you think it is with Arguments as with Writs, where the want of a Non obstante spoils all?
A59222	Why, suppose Mr. G. could not prove that Protestants are not Certain, are they therefore Certain?
A59222	Why?
A59222	Why?
A59222	Will it not follow, that he who at his Journeys End finds himself at York, did not go the Way to London?
A59222	Will it not follow, that the Way by which a man that goes in it comes to Errour, is not the Way to Truth?
A59222	Will it shew us, that a Cause can be without its Effect, or an Effect without its Cause?
A59222	Will it shew us, that a thing can be and not be at once?
A59222	Will it shew us, that a thing which can not possibly be chang''d, may yet possibly remain not the same?
A59222	Will the Dr hold to these words?
A59222	Will the alledging Invisible Qualifications do the work?
A59222	Will this venomous Ca nt never be left?
A59222	Will your Notwithstanding shew us there was a time in which Men were not Men, nor acted like Men?
A59222	With what Sense can any of this be imagin''d?
A59222	With what Sense can any of this be pretended?
A59222	Yet, how oft has he heard them say, I am Infallibly Certain of such a thing?
A59222	Yet, what is it you will not do?
A59222	You Preface to the Third Proposition with asking, who I dispute against?
A59222	You proceed: Must a Rule be no good Rule, because some who use it misunderstand it and abuse it?
A59222	You question on; Must a Way be a wrong Way, because some that take it will not keep it?
A59222	all the Points of Christian Faith( there spoken of) Particular Opinions?
A59222	and allowing no Absolute Certainty to any particular Point of Faith, may be called an Answer?
A59222	and what wants it, save bare Application, to conclude what was intended as fully and as rigorously as you can desire?
A59222	and which shall they be for; the Argument or the Instance?
A59222	and why if I would be thought to dispute against you, I do not use such and such Terms?
A59222	and, Is not that Essentially your Particular Rule of Faith, that gives you your Particular Faith?
A59222	degenerated into Parrots, and learn''d to prate set- Words, without minding their Sense?
A59222	especially, since he stands impeacht of destroying Church- Government as to any thing belonging to Faith?
A59222	its Plainness to People of all sorts who are to be regulated by it?
A59222	l. 32. upon it?
A59222	must he put what Sense he thinks fit to the Question?
A59222	nor to reflect that our Controversy only treats of them under this latter Consideration?
A59222	of Arguing against the Conclusion instead of Answering the Premisses?
A59222	or must I stand answering every voluntary saying of his( which are infinit,) every Supposition, and every why not?
A59222	or whom does it oppose?
A59222	prov''d that Doctor St''s Church has no Certainty of its Faith?
A59222	that It is impossible they should adhere to our Rule, and yet erre?
A59222	that is, without any Publick Interpreter?
A59222	the Souls of the Faithfull, and the Scripture?
A59222	was it an Argument?
A59222	what Doctrin was Deliver''d immediately before, and this throughout every Age, Year, or Day?
A59222	what Grace of God, what Assistance of the Holy Spirit are necessary to such a Faith as this?
A59222	what an Answer has that weak man given us?
A59222	when you can not but know, they dare not teach them any Faith, but what the Church holds; nor does the Church hold any but upon Tradition?
A59222	why did he not deny it?
A59222	why did he not, the Proposer being present, desire him to explain it?