quadgram

This is a table of type quadgram and their frequencies. Use it to search & browse the list to learn more about your study carrel.

quadgram	frequency
h h h h	363
on the other hand	89
if a is b	87
in the case of	81
some x are y	71
at the same time	70
as a matter of	69
the truth of the	63
that is to say	63
the nature of the	60
in so far as	58
of c being d	54
from the standpoint of	53
for the sake of	50
a is not b	46
all x are y	46
a is b or	46
some c is not	45
a matter of fact	45
eliminands not asserted to	45
fallacy of like eliminands	45
of like eliminands not	45
not asserted to exist	45
like eliminands not asserted	45
the subject of the	44
fallacy of unlike eliminands	42
eliminands with an entity	42
unlike eliminands with an	42
no x are y	42
of unlike eliminands with	42
this point of view	41
as we have seen	41
is said to be	40
of the nature of	40
in the same way	39
all a is b	39
either a is b	39
the fact that the	38
the question of the	37
c is not d	37
of a being b	36
cases of c being	36
in the sense of	35
in the process of	35
c is not a	34
some s is not	34
in the course of	34
the problem of the	34
that there is no	34
the case of the	33
is a case of	33
all b is c	32
a part of the	32
on the one hand	32
in the first figure	31
on the basis of	31
is b or c	30
no x are m	30
are cases of c	30
all x are m	30
from this point of	30
to be regarded as	29
it is evident that	28
the meaning of the	28
b or c is	28
the conclusion must be	27
so far as it	27
some y are x	27
all b is a	27
it is to be	27
it is impossible to	27
in the first place	27
with a view to	27
that it is not	26
we have seen that	26
to say that the	26
what is meant by	26
there can be no	26
the form of the	25
is one of the	25
all c is b	25
no a is b	25
terms of x and	25
in terms of x	25
cases of a being	25
illicit process of the	25
all y are m	24
on the side of	24
in the form of	24
all m are x	24
s is in p	24
it is not a	24
in terms of the	24
the proposition may be	23
in which it is	23
subject of the judgment	23
all m are y	23
b are cases of	23
in the books example	23
being b are cases	23
is true of the	23
in the nature of	23
some a is not	22
the name of a	22
all m is in	22
the sign of quantity	22
proposition may be written	22
but it is not	22
the standpoint of the	22
or c is d	22
it will be seen	22
process of the major	21
all s is p	21
as if it were	21
in the same sense	21
right one is some	21
let us suppose that	21
is a matter of	21
the consciousness of value	21
all cases of a	21
is equivalent to the	21
in accordance with the	21
some m are x	21
be said to be	21
some c is a	21
a more or less	21
may be said to	21
the point of view	21
it is true that	21
the law of identity	20
is not to be	20
s is not p	20
of the relation of	20
no c is a	20
if e is f	20
of the process of	20
one and the same	19
the basis of the	19
it is not the	19
with reference to the	19
a proposition of relation	19
the way in which	19
law of excluded middle	19
the law of excluded	19
is known as the	19
m is in p	19
of the value of	19
the predicate of the	19
some new cakes are	18
c is always d	18
by means of a	18
may be regarded as	18
a not being b	18
hence proposed conclusion is	18
of y and m	18
it is clear that	18
be distributed in the	18
that there is a	18
some y are m	18
a case of c	18
in the way of	18
that it is a	18
all y are x	18
s is in m	18
of the fact that	18
the logic of the	18
no b is a	18
of x and m	18
in relation to the	18
of the law of	18
is not a case	18
not a case of	18
c is d or	18
the character of the	17
case of c being	17
some c is b	17
sign of quantity is	17
with regard to the	17
of the same kind	17
no m are x	17
the use of the	17
on the part of	17
the value of the	17
as we shall see	17
the relation of the	17
the law of contradiction	17
the idea as a	17
as a part of	17
similarly we may represent	17
will be seen that	17
to do with the	17
we may represent the	17
so far as the	17
a matter of course	17
be found in the	17
the university of chicago	16
p is in m	16
to be found in	16
the method of difference	16
as in the case	16
in the major premiss	16
as well as the	16
one or the other	16
is not in p	16
it is only by	16
the major premiss is	16
in the light of	16
new cakes are nice	16
a being b are	16
in the sense that	16
no m are y	16
is or is not	16
the quality of the	16
the form of a	16
for the time being	16
the whole of the	16
m is in s	16
one of the premisses	16
is the result of	16
of a not being	16
as matter of fact	16
what is to be	16
the definition of the	16
the subject and the	16
absolute system of ideas	16
all s is in	15
of the meaning of	15
this is not a	15
the partly conjunctive syllogism	15
proposed conclusion is right	15
it is necessary to	15
is the name of	15
one or other of	15
the significance of the	15
all men are mortal	15
the dictum de omni	15
a case of a	15
the validity of the	15
this tells us that	15
either c is d	15
the existence of the	15
on the assumption that	15
that and the other	15
the determination of the	15
at the end of	15
distributed in the conclusion	15
of the four figures	15
some x are m	15
s is not in	15
c is never d	15
no s is p	15
from the fact that	15
for the purpose of	15
of the problem of	14
in view of the	14
in the history of	14
major premiss must be	14
the degree in which	14
if there were any	14
conclusion must be particular	14
the major premiss must	14
to which it is	14
in virtue of the	14
of the validity of	14
to the fact that	14
some s is in	14
is to be understood	14
or e is f	14
of the function of	14
it is possible to	14
if c is d	14
on the ground that	14
d or g is	14
is to be done	14
are said to have	14
we have already seen	14
de omni et nullo	14
it is difficult to	14
nothing to do with	14
which we may call	13
point of view of	13
to say nothing of	13
the difference between the	13
may represent the three	13
in order to be	13
it is a case	13
the quantity of the	13
it is obvious that	13
as distinct from the	13
of the existence of	13
an instance of the	13
we do not know	13
on the ground of	13
the relation of thought	13
in its whole extent	13
proposition all x are	13
of subject and predicate	13
truth or falsity of	13
the subject and predicate	13
in such a case	13
there is no conclusion	13
subject and the predicate	13
us suppose that we	13
represent the three similar	13
the proposition all x	13
in the development of	13
is to be regarded	13
c is sometimes not	13
b or e is	13
premiss must be universal	13
to the conclusion that	13
theory of the judgment	13
as a case of	13
one of the most	12
case of a being	12
that it is only	12
the recognition of the	12
pair of codivisional classes	12
of the laws of	12
the distinction between the	12
cases of a not	12
what is known as	12
truth of the consequent	12
a is sometimes b	12
of the truth of	12
all the members of	12
none but the brave	12
the nature of a	12
from the point of	12
we shall have to	12
the same thing as	12
dictum de omni et	12
it is possible for	12
no s is in	12
one to the other	12
of the idea as	12
in the evolution of	12
no y are m	12
the fact that it	12
through the medium of	12
the case of a	12
the idea of a	12
as we have already	12
the sense in which	12
of the consciousness of	12
it is not true	12
a plan of action	12
and no x are	12
members of the subject	12
of which it is	12
in the absence of	12
of propositions of relation	12
in the absolute system	12
under the head of	12
it will be found	12
when we say that	12
forms of immediate inference	12
or some a is	12
thought and its subject	12
conclusion must be negative	12
all bideford men are	12
in a general way	12
the history of the	12
of a general name	12
to show that the	12
in the north half	12
some a is b	12
of the logic of	11
is not so much	11
the first of these	11
the assumption of a	11
we see that the	11
no y are x	11
of the world of	11
or g is h	11
a situation which is	11
so far as they	11
as part of the	11
the meaning of a	11
to be understood as	11
be conceived to exist	11
some s is p	11
of thought as such	11
the nature of reality	11
the truth is that	11
a knowledge of the	11
but the brave deserve	11
that it is the	11
the denial of the	11
members of a class	11
we are said to	11
been out for a	11
of them would be	11
it may be said	11
there is nothing in	11
what is called a	11
the position of the	11
of the judgment is	11
may be called the	11
the part of the	11
rules of the syllogism	11
the side of the	11
logic of the schools	11
the proposition no x	11
but it is a	11
be regarded as a	11
is sometimes not d	11
the solution of the	11
to be able to	11
representation of propositions of	11
is b or e	11
it must be remembered	11
out for a walk	11
brave deserve the fair	11
the middle term is	11
the brave deserve the	11
the cause of the	11
the minor premiss is	11
if we wish to	11
the laws of thought	11
and at the same	11
of which we have	11
is one in which	11
it is only the	11
affirmed or denied of	11
and it is the	11
a case of knowledge	11
of each of the	11
or of y and	11
either c is not	10
determination of the means	10
with the problem of	10
it is not necessary	10
if the conclusion be	10
is contained in the	10
be regarded as the	10
members of the class	10
is the same as	10
the process by which	10
horse is an animal	10
to the first figure	10
if a is not	10
we have now to	10
there is nothing to	10
some existing things are	10
it is in the	10
to say that a	10
in the sphere of	10
of truth and error	10
are said to be	10
of the internal meaning	10
the points of resemblance	10
conclusion can be drawn	10
half of the cupboard	10
may be written all	10
in the interpretation of	10
whenever some of the	10
it is no longer	10
is involved in the	10
a matter of the	10
and this we can	10
the current of ideas	10
can be conceived to	10
no m is in	10
a is sometimes not	10
moods of the first	10
of thought at large	10
the proposition now becomes	10
is nothing in the	10
in such a way	10
the conditions under which	10
this is a case	10
x are y and	10
the laws of nature	10
the moods of the	10
there is a certain	10
the rules of the	10
true of the whole	10
the work of thought	10
is a double proposition	10
it is only when	10
the statement of the	10
in the direction of	10
we may say that	10
is affirmed or denied	10
we are apt to	10
the situation in which	10
the end of the	10
as far as possible	10
the subject is evidently	10
proposition some x are	10
one of the two	10
so far as we	10
can be no doubt	10
imagine that we have	10
but this does not	10
is to be found	10
any one of the	10
all c is a	10
is a term denoting	10
of the energetic self	10
in a certain way	10
it is easy to	10
not being b are	10
which we have been	10
does not mean that	10
of the first figure	10
the application of the	10
in virtue of which	10
as an instrument of	9
to which they are	9
in connexion with the	9
a certain amount of	9
is the process of	9
is a kind of	9
the real world as	9
term is a term	9
the known to the	9
the minor premiss must	9
c is sometimes d	9
of a proposition of	9
proposition is one in	9
subject are members of	9
is nothing but a	9
just in so far	9
there seems to be	9
known to the unknown	9
the result of a	9
new cakes are not	9
a theory of the	9
of a term is	9
the definition of a	9
of fact and idea	9
this proposition would be	9
to the effect that	9
that the subject of	9
that the proposition is	9
this does not mean	9
as when we say	9
the members of the	9
some m are y	9
the three similar propositions	9
have been out for	9
some b is not	9
means of a third	9
of the need of	9
the ways in which	9
the process of thinking	9
the value of a	9
the discussion of the	9
x are y is	9
a member of the	9
the essence of the	9
with reference to which	9
the distribution of terms	9
the same as the	9
he goes on to	9
propositions some x are	9
the existence of a	9
to find out what	9
let us take the	9
ducks in this village	9
on its own account	9
is found in the	9
the middle term must	9
it may be that	9
reader should make out	9
is the subject of	9
if we were to	9
form of the expression	9
the doctrine of the	9
is technically known as	9
of the subject and	9
for the first time	9
equivalent to the two	9
socrates is a man	9
we shall find that	9
intension of a term	9
it is not so	9
which is taken as	9
the rest of the	9
idea as a purpose	9
is d or g	9
may be applied to	9
is a question of	9
for the most part	9
to the nature of	9
of the operations of	9
the same sort of	9
cases are cases of	9
of the conclusion is	9
there is no way	9
but this is not	9
in the degree in	9
b is not a	9
of one of the	9
in the determination of	9
the interpretation of the	9
the course of the	9
is the same thing	9
the heads of predicables	9
from the known to	9
it may be asked	9
throw light upon the	9
ethical and economic judgment	9
of the partly conjunctive	9
make out all these	9
that there are no	9
the origin of the	9
turns out to be	9
actual cases are cases	9
way in which the	9
it will be well	9
such a way as	9
we are able to	9
the members of a	9
the act of thinking	9
will be found to	9
a pair of codivisional	9
p some s is	9
the function of the	9
whole of the subject	9
as an immediate inference	9
in the mind of	9
the idea of the	9
either a being b	9
the reduction of the	9
if c is not	9
should make out all	9
the special rules of	9
the truth or falsity	9
out all these for	9
it is the only	9
some b is c	9
all these for himself	9
into the two classes	9
statement of the problem	9
the content of the	9
not distributed in the	9
to the two propositions	9
out of which the	9
the reader should make	9
it must not be	9
the sense of the	9
premiss must be affirmative	9
the proposition some x	9
what is true of	9
of thought is to	9
an account of the	9
in the second place	9
minor premiss must be	9
and in the same	9
problem of the relation	8
it is an object	8
of the history of	8
which are proposed as	8
the place of the	8
does not follow that	8
in this case we	8
to the whole of	8
can represent by placing	8
in order to make	8
in reference to the	8
there would be no	8
are valid in the	8
as the result of	8
be more than one	8
be used as a	8
the ethical and economic	8
if it is not	8
special rules of the	8
upon the fact that	8
and if e is	8
in the fact that	8
in the sense in	8
the predicate is a	8
the quantity of a	8
three other similar propositions	8
that a thing is	8
the result of the	8
the same way the	8
that the real world	8
be borne in mind	8
defined in terms of	8
in the face of	8
the intension of a	8
both subject and predicate	8
the conception of the	8
relation of thought to	8
it is a judgment	8
must be remembered that	8
sense of the term	8
of the reflective process	8
cannot both be true	8
the method of agreement	8
some of them would	8
in which the predicate	8
of the second figure	8
this we can represent	8
under the title of	8
only in so far	8
in order to see	8
solution of the problem	8
of thought is the	8
we may call the	8
is that it is	8
at least one thing	8
in and of itself	8
from the side of	8
the evolution of the	8
resemble each other in	8
the process of reasoning	8
of the fallacy of	8
things resemble each other	8
may be defined as	8
the presence of the	8
in the second figure	8
have seen that the	8
there is only one	8
upon the nature of	8
the subject or not	8
goes on to say	8
there is no other	8
and some of the	8
an object of thought	8
the course of our	8
one in which the	8
and not in the	8
of either a being	8
we can represent by	8
to say that it	8
in the logical sense	8
is not true that	8
the question of how	8
the act of judgment	8
that some of the	8
is evident from the	8
of the possibility of	8
of thinking as a	8
the absence of the	8
bankers are rich men	8
the purpose of the	8
be seen that the	8
of more or less	8
a being b or	8
of the method of	8
but there is no	8
it is in this	8
the conclusion that the	8
in the matter of	8
each of the following	8
is a world of	8
represent by placing a	8
of the subject are	8
of what to do	8
are members of the	8
as an account of	8
to a reality beyond	8
conditions under which the	8
is to say that	8
conclusions to be found	8
that it is impossible	8
is not d or	8
use of the word	8
from one to the	8
the falsity of the	8
it follows that the	8
of the conditions of	8
of reason and consequent	8
the problem is to	8
of the world as	8
of x and y	8
some chickens are cats	8
i wish to examine	8
of the judgment must	8
use of the syllogism	8
is either b or	8
in the discussion of	8
are not to be	8
in the ordinary sense	8
the canon of the	8
we know that this	8
that it is possible	8
for the purposes of	8
which may be called	8
the fact that a	8
members of the predicate	8
when the middle term	8
the natural history of	8
in which they are	8
the answer is that	8
is true that the	8
c not being d	8
a way as to	8
if a man is	8
the relation between the	7
a question of the	7
it may be well	7
it is assumed that	7
the world as fact	7
and e being f	7
it does not follow	7
we are entitled to	7
from the truth of	7
the various forms of	7
the one hand and	7
no conclusion can be	7
the realm of internal	7
similar propositions the proposition	7
the same third term	7
of the relation between	7
and it is only	7
as that of the	7
c is not b	7
it is not an	7
say that it is	7
the affirmation or denial	7
a horse is an	7
a red counter in	7
each of the two	7
to the method of	7
the subject of a	7
in the use of	7
the objectivity of the	7
be illicit process of	7
there has been a	7
will serve as a	7
reference to its own	7
in this case the	7
may be expressed as	7
as a whole is	7
what has been said	7
to point out that	7
the results of the	7
we know to be	7
not contained in the	7
in the attempt to	7
the key to the	7
and some are not	7
the general rules of	7
to the energetic self	7
we have only to	7
will be found that	7
all diligent students are	7
in the act of	7
is difficult to see	7
not both of them	7
the process of judgment	7
these three propositions would	7
in the formation of	7
in terms of y	7
the common attributes of	7
one and the many	7
the minor term is	7
it will be remembered	7
or it may be	7
other similar propositions the	7
an object as a	7
a train of reasoning	7
we have been told	7
is the same in	7
when we speak of	7
the division of terms	7
a is never b	7
the manner in which	7
is a part of	7
an illicit process of	7
nature of the case	7
may be represented by	7
is at least one	7
of the inductive sciences	7
some men are not	7
as to whether the	7
of the character of	7
as well as to	7
in the chapter on	7
a is not c	7
are y and no	7
seems to be an	7
certain absolute system of	7
is not easy to	7
in spite of the	7
thing to be done	7
it is a matter	7
is the relation of	7
regarded as an immediate	7
point of view the	7
to the determination of	7
on the same level	7
it is sufficient to	7
part of the predicate	7
d or e is	7
none of them are	7
are cases of a	7
in the first case	7
may be replaced by	7
is a general name	7
the battle of waterloo	7
that it would be	7
far as it is	7
the discovery of the	7
of what is known	7
which is equivalent to	7
used in its whole	7
the harbour is frozen	7
is the test of	7
the things which possess	7
sitting on the fence	7
of the university of	7
object in the absolute	7
the absolute system of	7
suppose that we have	7
no b is c	7
be remembered that the	7
the first and second	7
b or e being	7
an indefinite number of	7
be crossed in love	7
three propositions would be	7
as well as in	7
whatever is true of	7
the major must be	7
some a is c	7
by which it is	7
has nothing to do	7
it is of the	7
terms of y and	7
to the attainment of	7
by which is meant	7
the major premiss and	7
no c is b	7
and is equivalent to	7
the methods of science	7
a class of things	7
seems to have been	7
we have been considering	7
a is some b	7
at the outset of	7
the first of the	7
within the sphere of	7
idea as a plan	7
are of the same	7
subject of the conclusion	7
may be written no	7
is the fallacy of	7
in the same manner	7
any pair of premisses	7
being b or e	7
the sense of a	7
in the minor premiss	7
we arrive at the	7
part of a term	7
as one of the	7
of the absolute system	7
is used in its	7
the terms of the	7
world as it is	7
with that of the	7
of the reduction of	7
the theory of the	7
we have assigned the	7
in one of the	7
of the tenth regiment	7
general rules of syllogism	7
the root of the	7
placed in the north	7
of a number of	7
of the scotch are	7
by the fact that	7
the assumption of the	7
to all cases of	7
subject and predicate are	7
us that there is	7
character of the idea	7
to speak of the	7
objective world of meanings	7
as well as of	7
what is called the	7
no existing things are	7
all a are e	7
but they are not	7
the thing in question	7
be true or false	7
valuation of the means	7
the nature of things	7
of the terms in	7
pair of converse propositions	7
d or a is	7
in this form of	7
of this or that	7
it is only in	7
the result of comparing	7
the rule that the	7
or e being f	7
in which there is	7
let persons be universe	7
will be found in	7
it may not be	7
the one and the	7
all p is in	7
a statement of the	7
a large number of	7
the sense of being	7
the nature of an	7
the principle of single	7
the conditions of the	7
that there is an	7
the centre of the	7
in the one case	7
term must be distributed	7
in order to get	7
of mood and figure	7
of the objectivity of	7
it is a question	7
as a method of	7
rules of the four	7
tells us that there	7
is that which is	7
the data of experience	7
is the essence of	7
the first step in	7
of the real world	7
by the method of	7
that a is b	7
one or more of	7
to the same thing	7
of this form of	6
the idea as the	6
truth of the antecedent	6
the discovery of truth	6
p no s is	6
to account for the	6
the products of thought	6
when we come to	6
knowledge of the world	6
a is either b	6
the same is true	6
we already know how	6
this is not to	6
by means of the	6
a portion of the	6
on a triliteral diagram	6
e is not f	6
they have in common	6
the first figure is	6
between them a pair	6
set over against the	6
the situation as a	6
difficult to see how	6
there is at least	6
all members of the	6
g is not h	6
are to be regarded	6
view of the nature	6
no son of mine	6
as a practical science	6
of the difference between	6
of three other similar	6
by the laws of	6
that there are some	6
and the other in	6
as we have said	6
the absence of a	6
we are liable to	6
c being d and	6
it is said that	6
similarly we may interpret	6
truth of an idea	6
rainy days are tiresome	6
is an attribute which	6
to be the same	6
is called the major	6
of rarefaction and condensation	6
distributed in the premisses	6
is given in the	6
and of three other	6
is an inference from	6
different points of view	6
has been developed by	6
in so far forth	6
a part of a	6
something to be done	6
the face of the	6
principle of single difference	6
y and no x	6
of their relation to	6
the matter of the	6
are to be found	6
brought to bear upon	6
would seem to be	6
of the act of	6
quantity of the subject	6
in the third figure	6
term is the name	6
a consideration of the	6
a factor in the	6
it may also be	6
by reference to the	6
the name of an	6
of the disjunctive syllogism	6
of the fourth figure	6
is not in the	6
or that it is	6
university of chicago press	6
s some s is	6
the test of the	6
pair of premisses which	6
is the only one	6
answer to the question	6
in a world of	6
an example of the	6
the basis of a	6
that the question of	6
the fact that there	6
by reason of the	6
meaning of the terms	6
the logical function of	6
as singing in tune	6
to each of the	6
is consequent from them	6
if one premiss be	6
between the two terms	6
may or may not	6
the two terms are	6
will be well to	6
was not distributed in	6
and the need of	6
known as the dictum	6
if one of two	6
that the predicate is	6
the very essence of	6
cases of either a	6
that what is true	6
all cats understand french	6
of a situation which	6
the matter of experience	6
in order that it	6
to me to be	6
that the conclusion is	6
be considered as a	6
half of smaller diagram	6
predicate of the conclusion	6
of the idea to	6
the pair of converse	6
may imagine that we	6
or more of the	6
we have now got	6
with the matter of	6
b is not not	6
the extension of the	6
to be brought about	6
the case may be	6
but there is a	6
as it is for	6
the consciousness of objectivity	6
be taken into account	6
said to be the	6
of the current of	6
relations to one another	6
no new cakes are	6
it is equally true	6
experience as a whole	6
to see that the	6
members of its predicate	6
that the process of	6
we have just seen	6
the existence of its	6
has to do with	6
know how to represent	6
under the influence of	6
what is it that	6
meaning of the term	6
taken for granted as	6
there is a great	6
in and out of	6
antecedents of thought are	6
in the latter case	6
first step in the	6
persons who are not	6
go by the train	6
the objective world of	6
hence it must be	6
as it is the	6
way of saying that	6
is sometimes not b	6
so that it is	6
it is not to	6
it is impossible for	6
real world as it	6
suppose that we find	6
books into the two	6
an integral part of	6
is nothing to prevent	6
the facts of the	6
no part of the	6
must be taken into	6
it seems to me	6
of the hypothesis is	6
the order of the	6
the terms in the	6
a term which is	6
of c not being	6
exclusion on the ground	6
causes vibration in the	6
to which they belong	6
if it were not	6
s is p is	6
under the name of	6
things which possess the	6
the rights of mankind	6
is concerned with the	6
the beginning of the	6
is no part of	6
the predicate is not	6
some b is a	6
sense in which the	6
the comparison of two	6
situation as a whole	6
them a pair of	6
of practical deliberation and	6
we have picked out	6
of the one and	6
is equally true that	6
relation to one another	6
have nothing to do	6
i do not mean	6
existence of its subject	6
none of my cousins	6
it may be a	6
a high degree of	6
of the same genus	6
of the significance of	6
which is to be	6
basis of the division	6
involves the truth of	6
said to be a	6
whatever it may be	6
p all s is	6
men walk on their	6
of the matter of	6
is evident that the	6
the antecedents of thought	6
we are left with	6
to the character of	6
is equivalent to saying	6
is the form of	6
a course of action	6
relation to each other	6
be said to have	6
when it is not	6
the explanation of the	6
to walk to the	6
be understood as asserting	6
would appear to be	6
it would be a	6
is due to the	6
proposition no x exist	6
already know how to	6
that all s is	6
vibration in the air	6
idea of a thing	6
that i do not	6
in the relation of	6
persons who have been	6
member of the class	6
is equivalent to all	6
with the question of	6
but it does not	6
the needs of the	6
material antecedents of thought	6
with reference to its	6
is the meaning of	6
of quantity is all	6
division of terms into	6
a grey counter in	6
what is the relation	6
will enable us to	6
when the major premiss	6
as cause and effect	6
of the argument is	6
in virtue of their	6
we are dealing with	6
all d is e	6
may be found in	6
should be left behind	6
may both be false	6
be interpreted to mean	6
were sentenced to imprisonment	6
in the definition of	6
a proposition of existence	6
may be affirmed or	6
this brings us to	6
of the division of	6
know that this represents	6
all ignorant students are	6
degree in which it	6
three other similar arrangements	6
the predicate is the	6
propositions to be represented	6
is not the case	6
is the cause of	6
and this is the	6
the presence of a	6
of the major term	6
time to walk to	6
the result of an	6
to the problem of	6
an object of knowledge	6
of the self as	6
the content of an	6
the sum total of	6
in or out of	6
may be well to	6
are apt to be	6
may be said that	6
that we have picked	6
conceived to exist by	6
by the phrase are	6
walk to the station	6
all b are c	6
the determination of a	6
and which are proposed	6
all m is p	6
to be a good	6
no misers are unselfish	6
as to the nature	6
by itself as a	6
in the interests of	6
question of the validity	6
may be considered as	6
we are concerned with	6
are persons who have	6
of the subject of	6
have now got cells	6
of what is to	6
that the truth of	6
the thing to be	6
it would not be	6
in a position to	6
the reader had better	6
the name of the	6
that it does not	6
all wasps are unfriendly	6
relation to a third	6
we know that the	6
existence of the world	6
of my cousins are	6
but this is a	6
the point at which	6
the other must be	6
be replaced by the	6
the proof of a	6
by the use of	6
with the help of	6
of the whole class	6
which is meant the	6
some chickens understand french	6
point of contact with	6
one in each cell	6
if the major premiss	6
may be reduced to	6
no old rabbits are	6
said to have been	6
do not know whether	6
a general proposition is	6
distributed in the convertend	6
the major term is	6
the whole of a	6
if it is a	6
of the distinction between	6
each of the four	6
to go by the	6
with the same third	6
can be used as	6
be affirmed or denied	6
we find that the	6
as long as the	6
ubiquity of the knowledge	6
the structure of the	6
turn out to be	6
it is taken as	6
that there should be	6
as we have just	6
and the other s	6
with the exception of	6
substitute the phrase are	6
practical deliberation and of	6
the importance of the	6
some prosperous men are	6
application of the principle	6
as the subject of	6
way in which it	6
to the cause of	6
of the whole of	6
to inquire into the	6
in the movement of	6
of which they are	6
some x are not	6
as a plan of	6
is it possible for	6
their relation to a	6
in the last resort	6
the case with the	6
either b or c	6
the subject are members	6
reference to each other	6
the head of a	6
the predicate of a	6
replaced by the phrase	6
would be no old	6
no p is in	6
side by side with	6
in the statement of	6
which we wish to	5
any one of them	5
the point at issue	5
in the transition from	5
content of the image	5
the interpretation of a	5
in order to know	5
b and e being	5
in reference to its	5
as explained at p	5
to the subject of	5
is the business of	5
middle term must be	5
of houses and streets	5
y are x three	5
no b are c	5
of propositions of existence	5
individuals of a class	5
it is evident from	5
three products of thought	5
is the object of	5
of the two premisses	5
is not at all	5
d and g being	5
no means follows that	5
just what is meant	5
way of dealing with	5
the passage of light	5
in the particular case	5
perception as a case	5
a definition must not	5
this can only be	5
that it will be	5
having to do with	5
upon the assumption of	5
some apples are not	5
when we try to	5
in their relation to	5
do not drink coffee	5
a man is a	5
do not mean that	5
there were any boys	5
arrived at by abstraction	5
one of them is	5
their relation to the	5
is clear that the	5
that in the case	5
p is called the	5
the violation of rule	5
publications of the university	5
upon which it is	5
may not be the	5
the sense that the	5
all the things which	5
in which the affirmation	5
is a consequence of	5
as to say that	5
the consideration of the	5
enough information to use	5
the full meaning of	5
of a whole term	5
the reason for this	5
the language of the	5
to suppose that the	5
were put on their	5
i am used to	5
point of view is	5
is a singular term	5
begged to prolong his	5
is in m no	5
in relation to other	5
the power of the	5
the latter is the	5
the consequent of the	5
that he does not	5
and there is no	5
which we already know	5
or does not belong	5
in the other case	5
in the long run	5
to refer to the	5
in the fourth figure	5
passage of light through	5
of a world of	5
it is important to	5
all horned animals ruminate	5
is wholly included in	5
our knowledge of the	5
by reference to its	5
that the content of	5
a general law or	5
some y are not	5
post hoc ergo propter	5
of terms divides them	5
is the significance of	5
of these two cells	5
subject is evidently the	5
we say that a	5
in the stage of	5
the laws of the	5
hoc ergo propter hoc	5
is apparent from the	5
the name of one	5
that which is taken	5
in the conduct of	5
there is no need	5
a name for a	5
suppose that we had	5
on the one side	5
just as much a	5
such as singing in	5
which the affirmation or	5
into the region of	5
the conditions of action	5
of the subject term	5
no x are not	5
to a consideration of	5
it is easier to	5
may be resolved into	5
of judgments of value	5
of view of the	5
s is p some	5
the bearing of this	5
are capable of being	5
their agreement or disagreement	5
in the world of	5
is no longer a	5
of the external world	5
its own final and	5
because it is the	5
are not so much	5
a and b are	5
final and completely individual	5
the same time the	5
that the experimental methods	5
of the means of	5
which is the same	5
the premisses of a	5
of the major premiss	5
the contradictory of the	5
to it in the	5
members of its subject	5
hence it may be	5
the concept of the	5
no one looks poetical	5
tells us that the	5
use of the term	5
is an immediate inference	5
that part of the	5
included in the second	5
a series of propositions	5
p all m is	5
in and of themselves	5
is taken as a	5
account of the matter	5
for its own sake	5
of my boys are	5
or divisions of labor	5
one looks poetical unless	5
of them must be	5
of the general name	5
an inseparable accident of	5
within the function of	5
a particular kind of	5
the test of validity	5
is in s some	5
all judges are just	5
is the province of	5
that all men are	5
between the subject and	5
in the narrow sense	5
the inference in the	5
soldiers of the tenth	5
propositions distribute their predicate	5
the peculiar problem of	5
m a r i	5
the two classes whose	5
the predicate applies to	5
form of a proposition	5
we need to be	5
from time to time	5
of ideas or meanings	5
the square of opposition	5
the second of the	5
d are cases of	5
to the exclusion of	5
realm of internal meaning	5
but a state of	5
men are not mortal	5
the truth of an	5
forms of common speech	5
in the existence of	5
a violation of the	5
on which it is	5
the method of explanation	5
the object of knowledge	5
law of homogeneous counter	5
would be some old	5
by the university of	5
common to all the	5
it may be useful	5
fulfilment of the purpose	5
all new cakes are	5
is easy to see	5
of the middle term	5
decennial publications of the	5
to be true or	5
integral part of the	5
it may be the	5
the analysis of the	5
are also members of	5
those in which the	5
no conclusion at all	5
work of thought is	5
is not contained in	5
the case before us	5
the province of logic	5
the fact that they	5
in the narrower sense	5
has done its work	5
of the activities of	5
problem of logical theory	5
to the law of	5
least one thing in	5
propositions the proposition no	5
it is found in	5
and completely individual expression	5
can keep a secret	5
can detect a sharper	5
of the work of	5
can be said to	5
the matter in a	5
the relation of a	5
belong to the things	5
syllogism in which the	5
of the processes of	5
interest in the subject	5
of contact with reality	5
with reference to some	5
as a means of	5
one another in time	5
are known as the	5
this gives us diagram	5
of an a proposition	5
it is only as	5
the house of commons	5
this phase of the	5
or denial is made	5
with respect to the	5
the object of a	5
more than five feet	5
on their own account	5
is an instance of	5
instance of the fallacy	5
a is all b	5
at the bottom of	5
minor premiss is affirmative	5
of the predicate is	5
to which the idea	5
the movements of the	5
existing things are members	5
the occurrence of the	5
persons who do not	5
to a number of	5
it is plain that	5
name of a thing	5
the objects to which	5
in proportion to the	5
who have been out	5
the movement of experience	5
subject in the major	5
an experience which is	5
of the empirical self	5
is the art of	5
order that it may	5
placing a red counter	5
the conclusion of the	5
is d or a	5
as a response to	5
at every point by	5
are left with six	5
the ordinary form of	5
to discuss the relation	5
as the case may	5
none of my boys	5
that some existing things	5
it is said to	5
of the new end	5
of the procedure of	5
have to do with	5
equal to two right	5
a number of different	5
a certain number of	5
the inner portion of	5
of some of the	5
and it is a	5
the essence of judgment	5
is supposed to be	5
there is no question	5
parts of the judgment	5
and if it be	5
other in terms of	5
in the major premise	5
an analysis of the	5
to two right angles	5
which there is no	5
a r i s	5
truth of the other	5
so that it would	5
physical determination of the	5
at large to reality	5
which can be used	5
of this kind of	5
the completion of the	5
as to make them	5
and e is f	5
between fact and idea	5
of a certain kind	5
there is no problem	5
be taken as a	5
are not cases of	5
if we ask what	5
one in terms of	5
what is the significance	5
the class of persons	5
the effect that the	5
the angles of a	5
definition of an object	5
not conveyed by the	5
to the process of	5
men are not happy	5
is one which has	5
with the sum of	5
not go beyond the	5
in a particular case	5
so long as the	5
s is not not	5
such a thing as	5
some victories have been	5
the major and the	5
apart from reference to	5
thus we are left	5
does not belong to	5
to the absolute system	5
in dealing with the	5
or is not a	5
it is not enough	5
of the data and	5
that it may be	5
all a is not	5
to belong to the	5
of what we have	5
as it is a	5
the very nature of	5
of reasoning may be	5
to ascertain what conclusion	5
there some y are	5
on the nature of	5
not d or g	5
without reference to the	5
may be made to	5
of ethical and economic	5
we should be able	5
of the knowledge relation	5
at this point to	5
the ubiquity of the	5
when the minor premiss	5
and that it is	5
the value of an	5
and for the sake	5
the fact that in	5
is a species of	5
in the major and	5
we are conscious of	5
when marked with counters	5
of the same things	5
to prolong his visit	5
a case of fig	5
in the attitude of	5
it is with reference	5
no muffins are wholesome	5
the construction of a	5
the author of the	5
can be drawn from	5
that there is nothing	5
cell to the one	5
be in terms of	5
the mind of the	5
each other in the	5
the meaning of terms	5
the interpretation of propositions	5
in p all m	5
to the point of	5
the force of the	5
show that it is	5
form all s is	5
is not a formal	5
of the kind of	5
within the scope of	5
may be useful to	5
of which the idea	5
in contrast with the	5
are x three other	5
predicate of a proposition	5
of the intension of	5
if he takes mustard	5
is identical with the	5
let things be universe	5
compared with one another	5
picked out from it	5
cell to the other	5
of the subject is	5
but because it is	5
in the former case	5
a case of the	5
the validity of a	5
to a person who	5
would also be true	5
poetical unless he is	5
put the same thing	5
which it is to	5
put a red counter	5
criterion of truth and	5
when it is said	5
is part of the	5
here we arrange thus	5
to show that it	5
is not an idea	5
we are told that	5
to which the name	5
is a condition of	5
in precisely the same	5
to all the members	5
a state of our	5
it is quite true	5
and g being h	5
distributed in the converse	5
by the name of	5
in the technique of	5
something which is not	5
some of the scotch	5
all c are d	5
considerations throw light upon	5
of the following propositions	5
situation in which the	5
it is part of	5
put on their trial	5
need to be told	5
things are members of	5
of the means in	5
the division of propositions	5
bound in consistency to	5
in the effort to	5
old english books exist	5
of the forms of	5
discuss the relation of	5
that he is not	5
the problem of knowledge	5
was the cause of	5
as well as a	5
major premiss is universal	5
quantification of the predicate	5
from all other things	5
a man who is	5
of the monitors are	5
of the imperfect figures	5
deserving of the fair	5
or other must be	5
are cases of either	5
own final and completely	5
the execution of the	5
of the rules of	5
by placing a red	5
the possibility of the	5
it by no means	5
in the strict sense	5
some old men are	5
of the way in	5
i do not know	5
the parts of the	5
is not necessary to	5
process of rarefaction and	5
i shall try to	5
all horses are animals	5
that a definition should	5
in the sense explained	5
there is a sense	5
a product of thought	5
it is the first	5
the other is false	5
is the limit of	5
response to its own	5
it is regarded as	5
is not a mere	5
seen that there are	5
or falsity of the	5
it is a good	5
in which the major	5
which it is the	5
in the four figures	5
terms divides them into	5
if it were a	5
of the determination of	5
not p some s	5
as to the reality	5
a case of knowing	5
it is just the	5
to the discovery of	5
subject and predicate of	5
which the predicate is	5
is no question of	5
all men are fallible	5
being d are cases	5
in the consideration of	5
the concept of a	5
may be gained by	5
the sum of the	5
it is a general	5
the ambiguity of the	5
name of an attribute	5
of thought to reality	5
logical point of view	5
this form of reasoning	5
it is just this	5
of thought and its	5
the presence of an	5
way of stating the	5
the objects to be	5
of conversion by negation	5
be gained by accident	5
out of the question	5
there would be nothing	5
are of two kinds	5
the partial fulfilment of	5
when the conclusion is	5
of the idea or	5
thought at large to	5
of them in the	5
a figure with three	5
that it was not	5
valid in the four	5
the process of arriving	5
it must be admitted	5
contain between them a	5
of the conditions under	5
bear in mind that	5
the maintenance of a	5
of the whole is	5
is a mode of	5
all a are b	5
if there are any	5
the other in terms	5
you are not a	5
a sense in which	5
which are valid in	5
admit of simple conversion	5
the minor must be	5
part of the definition	5
from that of the	5
to say that we	5
of quantity is no	5
in the case before	5
the judgment must be	5
must be distributed in	5
fact that there is	5
as a sort of	5
the premisses must be	5
are both of them	5
sentenced to hard labour	5
an argument from analogy	5
to reality as such	5
the nature of thought	5
to state the nature	5
the exercise of the	5
in any one of	5
where it is not	5
that none of them	5
he is going out	5
might suppose that we	5
for our present purpose	5
it is because the	5
if it be not	5
checked at every point	5
of the content of	5
the purpose in hand	5
process of arriving at	5
of arriving at a	5
to the truth of	5
definition of the subject	5
the same way as	5
the question as to	5
on the biliteral diagram	5
there is not the	5
that there can be	5
one or other must	5
in each of the	5
by no means follows	5
the utility of the	5
manner in which the	5
the major premiss of	5
inductio per enumerationem simplicem	5
matter of fact the	5
just what it is	5
in which it has	5
of view from which	5
proposition would be no	5
the history of science	5
inference to the unobserved	5
if we find that	5
of the situation is	5
if we are to	5
some of the monitors	5
it must be noticed	5
borne in mind that	5
given a pair of	5
is excluded from the	5
it would seem that	5
the existence of an	5
the conditions of correct	5
x three other similar	5
it is used in	5
reference to an end	5
thought is to be	5
in the scheme of	5
a term is the	5
conveys the idea of	5
the two propositions some	5
the real world is	5
it could not be	5
it is by the	5
to know that all	5
which one of the	5
the facts on which	5
the subject is the	5
that the fact of	5
of a course of	5
of the logical problem	5
are dreaded by children	5
one from the other	5
and had assigned the	5
all s is not	5
with the notion that	5
be taken for granted	5
angles of a triangle	5
that they are not	5
of the occurrence of	5
all a is c	5
to which we have	5
of the subject or	5
in the order of	5
things of the same	5
it is not easy	5
classification of terms divides	5
it must be in	5
a part of it	5
takes no account of	5
upon the basis of	5
is the work of	5
between it and the	5
to explain the phenomena	5
unless the major premiss	5
proposition no x are	5
by the application of	5
is as much a	5
with the rule that	5
is with reference to	5
is something to be	5
no a is c	5
of matters of fact	5
that there must be	5
on the road to	5
and with reference to	5
outside the sphere of	5
is good to eat	5
which flows from the	5
the surface of the	5
execution of the purpose	5
so far we have	5
the same thing in	5
looks poetical unless he	5
as an object of	5
the more necessary to	5
di m a r	5
is in p all	5
technically known as the	5
from particulars to particulars	5
either true or false	5
the criterion of truth	5
denial of the antecedent	5
a pair of propositions	5
as applied to the	5
we might suppose that	5
to the general name	5
that we have assigned	5
in the growth of	5
i have tried to	5
both in and out	5
are compared with one	5
the case in hand	5
the first part of	5
are persons who do	5
in the house of	5
the meaning of this	5
of the third figure	4
this is called the	4
of the general rules	4
must be the middle	4
of conditions and means	4
the material antecedents of	4
pair of contradictory terms	4
except in relation to	4
as a major premiss	4
that some s is	4
a mood of ourselves	4
way of looking at	4
which serves as a	4
brought me as much	4
antecedent of thought is	4
the intension of terms	4
which this or that	4
the predicate is that	4
the circumstance in which	4
the constitution of the	4
an ideal content is	4
but it is impossible	4
form or mode of	4
or e is not	4
one of the terms	4
to x and y	4
as far as the	4
all the attributes of	4
is in m all	4
a division of the	4
ways in which thought	4
it follows that a	4
exists only in the	4
genuine antecedent of thought	4
and the predicate in	4
is meant by the	4
in view of this	4
is distributed in the	4
that we have here	4
which the major premiss	4
we have not enough	4
it has not been	4
and conditions of action	4
names of concrete things	4
of the two is	4
my method of diagrams	4
be distinguished from the	4
man is a rational	4
the various kinds of	4
clearly the question of	4
i have been out	4
of the situation in	4
deliberation and of scientific	4
further determination of the	4
which it is not	4
the judgment of the	4
as much as the	4
moods which are valid	4
are singing rule britannia	4
but gold will silence	4
is also in the	4
and coherence as at	4
three similar propositions some	4
as distinguished from the	4
test of the validity	4
in the position of	4
we must have a	4
the extension of a	4
seven other similar propositions	4
diligent students are successful	4
the first place the	4
with six moods which	4
may call the class	4
of agreement between the	4
is only when we	4
of the various typical	4
fat creatures run well	4
of a complex proposition	4
to a class of	4
o cannot be converted	4
knowledge of the object	4
that of the predicate	4
or g is not	4
it is only a	4
to serve on a	4
of the economic judgment	4
at the last assizes	4
affirmation of the consequent	4
some of these boys	4
you have given me	4
what is already there	4
the operation of the	4
i do not think	4
of the parts of	4
is affirmed of the	4
that this is the	4
fe st i n	4
though not necessary in	4
from general to particular	4
high degree of probability	4
the source of error	4
doubt as to whether	4
when we recognize that	4
the relationship of thought	4
the point to be	4
in which we are	4
it must be the	4
the standpoint of their	4
the help of the	4
as to what it	4
it is at least	4
is declared to be	4
possible for socrates not	4
it has to do	4
all b is not	4
equivalent to saying that	4
the identification of the	4
are y and some	4
cakes are not nice	4
the same as in	4
is a difference between	4
was square at the	4
to make them into	4
some p is in	4
it is a mistake	4
the function of thought	4
have a right to	4
of the antecedent involves	4
understood as asserting that	4
they are said to	4
is meant the process	4
inner portion of the	4
the objective reference of	4
be expressed as follows	4
the following pairs of	4
to bear upon the	4
does not involve the	4
may be called a	4
that we have not	4
that the doctrine of	4
when placed in the	4
division of propositions into	4
a collective term is	4
all bankers are rich	4
a reference to the	4
the first principles of	4
of ideas that is	4
is in the chair	4
in the conception of	4
the rules for the	4
of error in the	4
is d or e	4
as a species of	4
organization of the whole	4
question of the material	4
call the class of	4
species of the genus	4
all these bonbons are	4
to the relation of	4
s r t s	4
province of logic to	4
no misers are generous	4
we must show that	4
of it whatever is	4
what really goes together	4
and the success of	4
the test of thought	4
cases in which the	4
one or more propositions	4
for the guidance of	4
the terms and propositions	4
the problem of how	4
in opposition to the	4
that he did not	4
no fat creatures run	4
answer is that the	4
question as to whether	4
relation of thought at	4
it ceases to be	4
of the theory of	4
at least one of	4
of the following forms	4
to the smaller diagram	4
are not both of	4
may be used as	4
or content of thought	4
order to see whether	4
the possibility and the	4
nature is dependent upon	4
from a general truth	4
of its subject are	4
the aristotelian logic is	4
a r e nt	4
of the things belonging	4
outer cell to the	4
to the mind of	4
thought is precisely the	4
in space and time	4
process of inductive reasoning	4
be had for a	4
law of inverse variation	4
idea in the logical	4
about the nature of	4
to the subject in	4
trial at the last	4
partial exclusion on the	4
sense in which they	4
double proposition some x	4
we have in our	4
one of a number	4
to its own product	4
and that we have	4
one or both of	4
to its own particular	4
doubt as to the	4
process is that of	4
serve on a jury	4
the problem of validity	4
is not one of	4
say nothing of the	4
to each other in	4
well when walking together	4
may represent the seven	4
the subject is used	4
the same number of	4
any one of a	4
to find out the	4
in a given direction	4
have what is called	4
in which the sense	4
so and so is	4
by the same name	4
a thing which is	4
premisses must be negative	4
is ever begged to	4
of the premisses must	4
what we have called	4
would be nothing to	4
term is subject in	4
the relations between the	4
propositions in which the	4
psychical image of the	4
them would be y	4
as a form of	4
material must be characterized	4
of an object as	4
three similar propositions no	4
is useful for proving	4
is evidently the class	4
it is of course	4
seems to me that	4
the genuine antecedent of	4
this would seem to	4
divides them into two	4
in accordance with it	4
a can only be	4
has a curly tail	4
and all the rest	4
seems to me to	4
of the means is	4
a doctor or not	4
with reference to one	4
the form or mode	4
to the solution of	4
place the red counter	4
to get rid of	4
all teutons are aryans	4
is impossible to be	4
the greatest number of	4
is the stay of	4
so far as to	4
in the space common	4
there is no such	4
is likely to be	4
the ships cannot come	4
the rich variety of	4
belongs or does not	4
the use made of	4
in favour of a	4
as they have been	4
the proposed premisses into	4
their heads cut off	4
a difference between validity	4
applied to complex propositions	4
taken in and of	4
the reader will find	4
as if they were	4
is meant by a	4
of the same term	4
have ceased to be	4
taken not as a	4
for their existence upon	4
none of his stories	4
absence of an attribute	4
is none the less	4
and all y are	4
to exist by itself	4
of the conservation of	4
of the two classes	4
this original constitution and	4
a reality which is	4
the possibility of knowledge	4
lead to the conclusion	4
but it is to	4
on the verge of	4
to the extent of	4
to the external meaning	4
meant the process of	4
is the number of	4
and the predicate of	4
all a is e	4
is used in extension	4
is no way of	4
it was square at	4
problem of how a	4
both in quantity and	4
we may interpret a	4
in either case the	4
being d and g	4
the physical object is	4
term which is wholly	4
in which he is	4
all c is d	4
represent the seven similar	4
the conclusion be negative	4
the process of inductive	4
look well when walking	4
difference where it finds	4
of the premisses is	4
mean that it is	4
but that it is	4
supposed to be the	4
of which we are	4
the means and conditions	4
to be true of	4
that a man is	4
the means of action	4
ever begged to prolong	4
is the basis of	4
of a general law	4
in the logic of	4
a natural history of	4
as compared with the	4
takes in the times	4
simple fact is that	4
the same kind of	4
be applied to the	4
is sometimes not not	4
so much for the	4
must be in the	4
is a thing which	4
the claim of the	4
which call it out	4
is not at once	4
c being d are	4
the attributes of the	4
of the points of	4
of the moral law	4
local and temporal combinations	4
the fact of the	4
the concept is the	4
be no old books	4
as cases of knowledge	4
know to be true	4
in quantity and in	4
is that in the	4
the decennial publications of	4
to a region of	4
of our own consciousness	4
of the syllogism as	4
or collection of words	4
on the other side	4
to be limited to	4
be a matter of	4
of one part of	4
the proposition of existence	4
and of scientific research	4
utility of the syllogism	4
by which we infer	4
no man walks on	4
be no doubt that	4
with the result that	4
a singular term is	4
because we do not	4