This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.
identifier | question |
---|---|
41838 | Then, you state that silk- hats are the promoters and cause of civilization in a community? |
41838 | For instance, the question once asked a respectable citizen on the witness stand:"Have you stopped beating your mother?" |
41838 | For instance:"You assert that the more civilized a community, the more silk- hats are to be found in it?" |
41838 | Upon what grounds do we argue? |
41838 | What is this mental process? |
41838 | When Newton saw the apple fall, the anticipatory question flashed through his mind,''Why do not the heavenly bodies fall like this apple?'' |
41838 | Why? |
6560 | ''Is Socrates a man?'' |
6560 | ''Is it possible for a man who is not writing to write?'' |
6560 | ''Well, is not an animal a body?'' |
6560 | ''Why?'' |
6560 | ''Yes,''''And are you an animal?'' |
6560 | ( 4) Is there balm in Gilead? |
6560 | ( 5) Does not his feebleness of character indicate either a bad training or a natural imbecility? |
6560 | ( 5)''Is stone a body?'' |
6560 | A cup, for instance, with precisely the same form, may be composed of very different matter- gold, silver, pewter, horn or what not? |
6560 | A full answer to the question''What is a Universal?'' |
6560 | All not- B is not- A, and followed by Subalternation? |
6560 | And again--''Can you carry this, that, and the other?'' |
6560 | And whether, therefore, the third head of indefinite propositions were not as superfluous as the so- called''common gender''of nouns in grammar? |
6560 | And why not from all? |
6560 | And why? |
6560 | Are abstract terms then, it may be asked, singular or common? |
6560 | Are there then any terms which possess no intension? |
6560 | Are you a thief and a liar too?'' |
6560 | Are_ you_ a thief and a liar too?'' |
6560 | But logicians anxious for simplification asked, whether a predicate in any given case must not either apply to the whole of the subject or not? |
6560 | But why, it maybe asked, should not the moods of the first figure equally well be regarded as indirect moods of the fourth? |
6560 | But, if you were to ask the same person''Do you mean that cows are all the ruminants that there are, or only some of them?'' |
6560 | Can the laws of thought be violated in like manner with the laws of the land? |
6560 | Do these two principles imply one another? |
6560 | Fairchild, is this true? |
6560 | For how could there be action without an agent? |
6560 | From how many of these propositions can the original one be derived? |
6560 | Granting the truth of the following propositions, what other propositions can be inferred by opposition to be true or false? |
6560 | Have you left off beating your mother yet?'' |
6560 | Here is the sort of example that Aristotle gives--''Is Plato different from Socrates?'' |
6560 | If the major term of a syllogism be the predicate of the major premiss, what do we know about the minor premiss? |
6560 | If the middle term be twice distributed, what mood and figure are possible? |
6560 | In appearance they can be, and manifestly often are violated- for how else could error be possible? |
6560 | In what figures is AEE valid? |
6560 | Is the suppressed premiss in any case disputable on material grounds? |
6560 | Is the term converse here used in its logical meaning? |
6560 | Now in which of these two senses are we using the term''laws of thought''? |
6560 | Or again, that man means a rational, and does not mean a speaking, a religious, or an aesthetic animal, or a biped with two eyes, a nose, and a mouth? |
6560 | Or are they inviolable like the laws of nature? |
6560 | Roughly it may be said that the Realists sought for the answer to the question''What is a Universal?'' |
6560 | Since every term must be either abstract or concrete, it may be asked-- Are attributives abstract or concrete? |
6560 | Suppose for a moment that this law did not hold-- then what would become of all our reasoning? |
6560 | The fact is-- so subtle are the ambiguities of language-- that even such a question as''Is a thing white or not- white?'' |
6560 | The man was exhibiting a blue horse; and the distinguished stranger asked him--''With what did you paint your horse?'' |
6560 | To ask this, is to ask-- Are there any terms which have absolutely no meaning? |
6560 | To which of the heads of predicables would you refer the following statements? |
6560 | Under which of the five heads would the predicates in the following propositions fall? |
6560 | What is the only kind of conclusion that can be drawn in all the figures? |
6560 | What kind of influence have we here? |
6560 | What moods are common to all the figures? |
6560 | What moods are peculiar to the first, second, and third figures respectively? |
6560 | When the middle term is distributed in both premisses, what must be the quantity of the conclusion? |
6560 | When, for instance, a thing is half white and half black, are we to say that it is white or black? |
6560 | When, for instance, we say''If the sky falls, we shall catch larks,''what is it that we really mean to assert? |
6560 | Where would be the use of establishing conclusions about things, if they were liable to evade us by a Protean change of identity? |
6560 | Wherein then does the difference lie? |
6560 | Wherein then lies the difference? |
6560 | Why are the premisses of Fesapo and Fresison not transposed in reduction like those of the other moods of the fourth figure? |
6560 | Why can there be no subaltern moods in the third figure? |
6560 | Why do the premisses EA yield a universal conclusion in the first two figures and only a particular one in the last two? |
6560 | Why is it sufficient to distribute the middle term once only? |
28696 | Adjunct for South- West Cell? |
28696 | Adjunct for West Half? |
28696 | Compartment for xy''? |
28696 | Then who_ were_ they, who were sentenced to imprisonment and were also sentenced to hard labour? 28696 which book do you mean?" |
28696 | ''In_ E_''? |
28696 | AND REASON? |
28696 | Adjunct for North- East Quarter, Outer Portion? |
28696 | Adjunct for South Half, Inner Portion? |
28696 | Adjunct for South Half? |
28696 | And how many Members have entered?" |
28696 | And of a Sorites? |
28696 | And what are its''Premisses'', its''Partial Conclusions'', and its''Complete Conclusion''? |
28696 | And what are its''Premisses''and its''Conclusion''? |
28696 | And what is a''Class''? |
28696 | And''in_ A_''? |
28696 | Do n''t you know that a Universal Negative_ asserts_ the existence of its Subject? |
28696 | Does this leave us free to make what supposition we choose as to_ E_? |
28696 | Have you got your new Club started yet?" |
28696 | I., II., or III.?" |
28696 | If we assume( as surely we may?) |
28696 | Q. Compartment for m''? |
28696 | Q. Compartment for x''y''m? |
28696 | Q. Compartment for ym? |
28696 | RHYME? |
28696 | The question now arises"What is the_ rest_ of the information which this Proposition gives us?" |
28696 | They_ must_ have had the verdict''guilty''returned against them, or how could they be sentenced?" |
28696 | What arbitrary rule does it sometimes require? |
28696 | What are the''Subject''and the''Predicate''of a Proposition? |
28696 | What are the''Universe of Discourse'', the''Eliminands'', and the''Retinends'', of a Syllogism? |
28696 | What are''Concrete''and''Abstract''Propositions? |
28696 | What are''Converse''Propositions? |
28696 | What are''Genus'',''Species'', and''Differentia''? |
28696 | What are''Real''and''Imaginary''Classes? |
28696 | What is a Proposition''in_ I_''? |
28696 | What is a''Definition''? |
28696 | What is a''Sorites''? |
28696 | What is a''Syllogism''? |
28696 | What is implied, in a Proposition of Relation, as to the Reality of its Terms? |
28696 | What is its''Normal''form? |
28696 | What is the''Normal''form of a Proposition of Existence? |
28696 | What is the''Universe of Discourse''? |
28696 | What is''Classification''? |
28696 | What is''Dichotomy''? |
28696 | What is''Division''? |
28696 | What makes you think we have?" |
28696 | What_ else_ do we need to be told, in order to know that_ all_ of them are there? |
28696 | What_ else_ do we need to be told, in order to know that_ all_ of them are there? |
28696 | When are Classes said to be''Codivisional''? |
28696 | Why should_ we_ be responsible for the validity of the Syllogisms of so antiquated an author as Aldrich?" |
28696 | You do n''t mean to tell me those tourists_ need_ to run? |
28696 | _ Author._"And here, again, I suppose you do n''t mean to assert there_ are_ any such convicts in existence?" |
28696 | _ Author._"Oh,_ that''s_ what you meant, is it? |
28696 | _ The use of"is- not"( or"are- not") as a Copula._ Is it better to say"John_ is- not_ in- the- house"or"John_ is_ not- in- the- house"? |
28696 | _ What is implied, in a Proposition of Relation, as to the Reality of its Terms?_ Propositions beginning with"Some"19"""No"""""All""§ 5. |
28696 | db''_{0}...( 10) Now what can we take along with db''_{0}? |
4763 | And is it Nature, or Art, that is to have the credit of this happy change? |
4763 | But why is this? |
4763 | Do you mean to tell us that all these Logicians are wrong? |
4763 | So you like a doll better than a cousin? 4763 The Man in the Wilderness asked of me''How many strawberries grow in the sea?''" |
4763 | Very glad to hear it: and how do you make it out to be so? |
4763 | Well, some geraniums are red, are n''t they? |
4763 | Well, who expects to be comfortable, out shopping? |
4763 | What are you talking about geraniums for? 4763 Why, do n''t you see that it''s absurd to call him a miserly merchant? |
4763 | Why, how do you make THAT out? 4763 Why, is n''t he very rich?" |
4763 | ( Sounds nice, does n''t it?) |
4763 | ( Would n''t THAT be a charming Universe to live in?) |
4763 | ( You think I invented that name, now do n''t you? |
4763 | ----- Suppose we find it marked like this:--||| 1| What would that tell us? |
4763 | 5? |
4763 | 5? |
4763 | 6? |
4763 | 6? |
4763 | 7? |
4763 | 8? |
4763 | And how are they to work, if they do n''t know anything? |
4763 | And now what am I driving at, in all this long rigmarole? |
4763 | And what name may we give to such a Conclusion? |
4763 | And what then? |
4763 | And what then?" |
4763 | Brown?" |
4763 | But is there any great harm in THAT, so long as you get plenty of amusement? |
4763 | But what''s the good of proving anything to YOU, I should like to know?" |
4763 | But, if they put it the other way, and ask"Can an Attribute exist without any Thing for it to belong to? |
4763 | Can it mean BOTH?" |
4763 | How may we detect a''Fallacious Conclusion''? |
4763 | How may we detect''Fallacious Premisses''? |
4763 | How shall I ever repay such kindness? |
4763 | If you mean that cousins are n''t dolls, who ever said they were?" |
4763 | In marking a pair of Premisses on the larger Diagram, why is it best to mark NEGATIVE Propositions before AFFIRMATIVE ones? |
4763 | In what cases may this be done? |
4763 | In what sense do we use the word''Universe''in this Game? |
4763 | Is it Particular or Universal? |
4763 | It is true we do not know whether its inner portion is empty or occupied: but what does THAT matter? |
4763 | Now what would you make of such a Proposition as"The Cake you have given me is nice"? |
4763 | People have asked the question"Can a Thing exist without any Attributes belonging to it?" |
4763 | Taking the upper half by itself, so that our Subject is"new Cakes", how are we to represent"no new Cakes are wholesome"? |
4763 | The smaller Diagram is now pretty liberally marked:---------| 0| 1||---|---|| 1||------- And now what Conclusion can we read off from this? |
4763 | We must take, as our''Universe'', some class of things which will include Dragons and Scotchmen: shall we say''Animals''? |
4763 | What are the two kinds of''Fallacies''? |
4763 | What are we to make of this, with regard to x and y? |
4763 | What are''Individual''Propositions? |
4763 | What are''Particular''and''Universal''Propositions? |
4763 | What does this mean? |
4763 | What does"some"mean in Logic? |
4763 | What is a''Double''Proposition? |
4763 | What is an''Attribute''? |
4763 | What kinds of Propositions imply, in this Game, the EXISTENCE of their Subjects? |
4763 | What two partial Propositions make up, when taken together,"all x are y"? |
4763 | What would this tell us, with regard to the class of"new Cakes"? |
4763 | What would you make of this, I wonder? |
4763 | What, then, are you to do? |
4763 | When does this happen? |
4763 | When is a class of Things said to be''exhaustively''divided? |
4763 | When is it NOT good sense? |
4763 | When is it good sense to put"is"or"are"between two names? |
4763 | When it is NOT good sense, what is the simplest agreement to make, in order to make good sense? |
4763 | Who can tell? |
4763 | Who should know better?" |
4763 | Why is it of no consequence to us, as Logicians, whether the Premisses are true or false? |
4763 | Would it not tell us that there are SOME of them in the x y- compartment? |
4763 | You never saw"beautiful"floating about in the air, or littered about on the floor, without any Thing to BE beautiful, now did you? |
4763 | You will take its four compartments, one by one, and ask, for each in turn,"What mark can I place HERE? |
36801 | ''* But whence is to come''this drop of sound logic?'' |
36801 | ''Do you want any blood shed for you?'' |
36801 | ''Does he shed anything for you that you_ do_ want? |
36801 | ''Has the reader ever seen Mr. Macready in the character of Macbeth? |
36801 | ''Look where we will, do we not find ignorance powerful for every kind of wrong and evil? |
36801 | --and lie for the right? |
36801 | And did you not hear him say that he could have shed his blood for me? |
36801 | And why should we be delighted with Mr. Macready''s delineation, and disgusted with the ranter? |
36801 | Are these the dispensations of Providence, or the dispensations of folly and crime? |
36801 | Ay-- this state- policy? |
36801 | Bishop Berkeley may demonstrate that we are not sure of matter''s existence-- but are we more sure of any thing else? |
36801 | But by what experience did Aristotle discover the centre of the universe, so as to become aware that heavy bodies_ naturally_ tend there? |
36801 | But how would it have been with a cloddish unimaginative fellow, whom nature never intended should understand Shakspere? |
36801 | But if he should still remain in doubt, where is the harm? |
36801 | But what comprehensive reasons are these? |
36801 | But when experience affords no model on which to shape the new conception, how is it possible for us to form it? |
36801 | But why overlooks he pure mathematics-- a much higher science than arithmetic? |
36801 | Can such a proposition have facts for its support? |
36801 | Does he even shed legs of mutton for you in any decent proportion to potatoes and garden stuff?'' |
36801 | Does he shed employment for you, instruction for you pocket money for you? |
36801 | How did he ascertain the limits of that which has no limits? |
36801 | How far may not this Tertsky have proceeded-- What may not he himself too have permitted Himself to do, to snare the enemy, The laws of war excusing? |
36801 | How is this proved to be the most formidable enemy of tyranny? |
36801 | How, for example, can we imagine an end to space or time? |
36801 | I have frequently put the question-- What is consciousness? |
36801 | If men are silent concerning objects and principles, it is said they have none, and it is impatiently asked''where is their bond of union?'' |
36801 | If reason will not serve us well, will anything serve us better? |
36801 | Is it; otherwise with the Church? |
36801 | Need it be added that this knowledge is only to be had by patient observation? |
36801 | On what facts rest the measurement of the radii from our earth to the boundless circumference of space? |
36801 | On what grounds are they considered to be true by one who declines investigation? |
36801 | Said generous Rob,''What need of Books? |
36801 | Shall he stay on shore or put out to sea? |
36801 | Shall the young man enter trade or a profession without being vitiated? |
36801 | Then how many boys ought our''philosopher''to have questioned before making his vast inference? |
36801 | This is true, but is it true that arithmetic is on_ this account_ to be imitated? |
36801 | Thus I found that huge reports, inflated as balloons, shrunk like them when pricked by the pin of a question--''Will you answer for it?'' |
36801 | Thus, on any assertion being made, ask-- Why is the assertion true? |
36801 | To all who told me anything, if I attached importance to it, I made it a rule to ask--''May I mention it to the party with your name?'' |
36801 | To all written communications answer--''Please add your name and address-- and may I publish them if occasion requires?'' |
36801 | Tyranny, says Cobbett, has no enemy so formidable as the pen, Why? |
36801 | Up springs at every step, to claim a tear, Some little friendship formed and cherished here? |
36801 | Upon asking the terms of apartments, I was met, in all cases, by several preliminary questions, as for whom were they? |
36801 | Was it classical in the principal of St. Alban''s College to abandon Euclid and cleave unto Cocker or Walkingame? |
36801 | What facts support the assertion that Afflictions are dispensations of Providence?'' |
36801 | What he would do? |
36801 | What investigation would it require to shew that they were valid? |
36801 | What should be the decision in this case? |
36801 | What was this, if not imagination? |
36801 | Where now? |
36801 | Where should a man''s reputation be safe from suspicion if not in the hands of his friend? |
36801 | Who is not aware of the failures of calculation when applied to the general business of life-- to statistics, moral and political? |
36801 | Why better? |
36801 | Why should I throw away so much time and painful attention upon a thing of so little real use? |
36801 | Why should not their discourse be expressed in brief, clear sentences? |
36801 | Why should they, like a certain learned politician on a public occasion, propose, as a sentiment,''The three R''s, Reading,''Riting, and''Rithmetic? |
36801 | or rather, why is it not to be considered a good? |
36801 | what number of persons? |
36801 | what station, habits, and probable stay? |
40794 | ( 1) Do ideas present themselves except in situations which are doubtful and inquired into? |
40794 | ( 3) Do they have any part to play in the conduct of inquiry? |
40794 | ( 5) And, finally, does validity have anything to do with truth? |
40794 | And how can it discriminate unless by telling by what road they got into our experience and what they do after they get there? |
40794 | And if the worlds are all private, pray who judges their likeness or unlikeness? |
40794 | And is judgment properly more than tentative save as it terminates in a known fact, i.e., a fact present without the intermediary of reflection? |
40794 | And that means what force shall the thing as means be given? |
40794 | And, if the latter, does the object, God as defined, or the notion, or the belief( the acceptance of the notion) effect these consequent values? |
40794 | And, once more, unless there is such a transition, is reasoning possible? |
40794 | Are they there? |
40794 | But how can a situation which is incomplete in fact be completely known until it_ is_ complete? |
40794 | But if the former, why should there be an idea at all, and why should it have to be tested by the fact? |
40794 | But if thought just accepts its material, how can there be any distinctive aim or activity of thought at all? |
40794 | But if we are concerned with a matter of serious analysis, one is bound to ask, Whence come these adjectives? |
40794 | But is smelling a case of knowledge? |
40794 | But they part company when a fundamental question is raised: Is all organized meaning the work of thought? |
40794 | But when thinking becomes research, when the doubt- inquiry function comes to its own, the problem is just: What is the fact? |
40794 | Can a satisfaction dependent on an assumption that an idea is already true be relevant to testing the truth of an idea? |
40794 | Can we"know that objects of sense, or very similar objects, exist at times when we are not perceiving them? |
40794 | Do they exist except when judgment is in suspense? |
40794 | Do they exist side by side with the facts when the facts are themselves known? |
40794 | Do they not all agree in setting up something fixed outside inquiry, supplying both its material and its limit? |
40794 | Do they really indicate fire? |
40794 | Do they serve to direct observation, colligate data, and guide experimentation, or are they otiose? |
40794 | Do they, therefore, already subsist in some realm of subsistence? |
40794 | Does this coequal presence guarantee an objectivity? |
40794 | Does this phase of the moon really mean rain, or does it just happen that the rain- storm comes when the moon has reached this phase? |
40794 | Except on the basis stated, what is the transition from the function of meaning to_ a_ meaning as an entity in reasoning? |
40794 | For example, my primary( and ultimate) judgment has to do, say, with buying a suit of clothes: whether to buy and, if so, what? |
40794 | Has it gained in validity in ceasing to be an independent myth, in becoming an element in systematized myth? |
40794 | Has not the lesson, however, been so well learned that we can drop reference to experience? |
40794 | How about that truth upon which we fall back as guaranteeing the credibility of other statements-- how about our major premise? |
40794 | How about their respective adaptability to the chief wearing use I have in mind? |
40794 | How can a thing be eaten unless it is, in and of itself, a food? |
40794 | How can such a standard be known? |
40794 | How can the former in any sense give a check or test of the value of the latter? |
40794 | How can this difference be explained? |
40794 | How can thought compare meanings with existences? |
40794 | How do their patterns compare? |
40794 | How do we know the same is not the case with the ideas which are the product of our most deliberate and extended scientific inquiry? |
40794 | How does it know which to eliminate as irrelevant and which to confirm as grounded? |
40794 | How does the non- pragmatic view consider that verification takes place? |
40794 | How does thought know which of the combinations are merely coincident and which are merely coherent? |
40794 | How far is it possible and legitimate to extend or generalize the results reached to apply to all propositions of facts? |
40794 | How is it, moreover, that even the act of being aware is describable as"momentary"? |
40794 | How shall it secure this? |
40794 | How shall we describe it? |
40794 | How then can its existence, even if its perception be but momentary, raise a question of"other times"at all? |
40794 | How then can value be given, as efficiency is given, until the end is chosen? |
40794 | How, after all, does even the ideally perfect valid thought apply or refer to reality? |
40794 | How, the implication runs, could reflection become generalized save by elimination of details as irrelevant? |
40794 | If the goodness of consequences arises from the context of the idea in belief rather than from the idea itself, does it have any verifying force? |
40794 | If there are, are they like those characters which books on logic talk about? |
40794 | In the end the one problem holds: How do the specifications of thought as such hold good of reality as such? |
40794 | Is a difference more than merely one of formulation? |
40794 | Is it an absolute which transcends and absorbs the difference? |
40794 | Is it an idea? |
40794 | Is not the distinction mere hair- splitting unless it is a way of smuggling in a quasi- idealistic dependence upon thought? |
40794 | Is or is not a personal factor found in truth evaluations? |
40794 | Is the agreement ultimately a matter of self- consistency of ideas? |
40794 | Is the photograph, then, to be conceived as a psychical somewhat? |
40794 | Is the way out now so simple? |
40794 | Is the_ object_ immediate or is it the object of an immediate noting? |
40794 | Is this to be taken in a static or in a dynamic way? |
40794 | It reads:"What difference would it practically make to anyone if this notion rather than that notion were true? |
40794 | It was hard up against its own dilemma: How can a man inquire? |
40794 | Just how does such agreement differ from success? |
40794 | More generally, what is the position of analytic realism about the future? |
40794 | Not what is the test of thought at large, but what validates and confirms_ this_ thought? |
40794 | Now is this meaning intended to_ replace_ the meaning of a"seeing force which runs things"? |
40794 | Now where does the argument stand? |
40794 | Or does it mean that, irrespective of the existence of any such object, a belief in it has that value? |
40794 | Or does it merely superadd a value to a meaning already fixed? |
40794 | Or is it intended to superadd a pragmatic value and validation to that concept of a seeing force? |
40794 | Or( if the superstition persists as to smell) is gnawing or poking a case of knowledge? |
40794 | Or, in another mode of statement:"Can the existence of anything other than our own[63] hard data be inferred from the existence of those data?" |
40794 | Pray what is this room and what defines the position( standpoint and perspective) of the two men and the standpoint"intermediate"between them? |
40794 | Shall I take it as means to present enjoyment, or as a( negative) condition of future health? |
40794 | Still the query haunts us: Is this so in truth? |
40794 | Supposing the individual stands still and attempts to compare his idea with the reality, with what reality is he to compare it? |
40794 | That is to say: Does it express the fact that a given content or meaning is_ de facto_ presented to the consciousness of all alike? |
40794 | The more specific question is: How does the particular functional situation termed the reflective behave? |
40794 | The question is worth asking: Is not the marked aversion on the part of some philosophers to any reference to psychology a Freudian symptom? |
40794 | The question which I raised in the last paragraph may then be restated in this fashion: Are there such features? |
40794 | The significance of these may be doubted: Do they_ mean_ real change in the sun or in the earth? |
40794 | Then what has become of the postulate that truth is agreement of idea with existence beyond idea? |
40794 | Then, once more, what is the test of any specific judgment? |
40794 | Truth means, as a matter of course, agreement, correspondence, of idea and fact( p. 198), but what do agreement, correspondence, mean? |
40794 | Under these conditions we get such questions as the following: What is the relation of rational thought to crude or unreflective experience? |
40794 | Unless a meaning is an inferred object, detached and fixed as a term capable of independent development, what sort of a ghostly Being is it? |
40794 | Unless there is some such conception as this, what conception of agreement is possible except the experimental or practical one? |
40794 | We have them; they exist; now what do they mean? |
40794 | What about their durability? |
40794 | What are the prices of given suits? |
40794 | What are their styles in respect to current fashion? |
40794 | What are these grounds? |
40794 | What has become of the correspondence of fact and thought? |
40794 | What is the barrier which prevents reason from complete penetration into the world of truth? |
40794 | What is the bearing of this account upon the"empirical datum"? |
40794 | What is the experience in which the survey of both idea and existence is made and their agreement recognized? |
40794 | What is the reason for using the term at all in philosophy? |
40794 | What is the relation of thought to reality? |
40794 | What is the validity of the various forms of thinking which find expression in the various types of judgment and in the various forms of inference? |
40794 | What is the value of the pleasure of eating the lobster as compared with the pains of indigestion? |
40794 | What shall we say of the validity of such processes? |
40794 | What we have to reckon with is not the problem of, How can I think_ überhaupt_? |
40794 | What will I have the situation_ become_ as between alternatives? |
40794 | What_ is_ a thing when it is not yet discovered and yet is tentatively entertained and tested? |
40794 | Whence does it derive its guaranty? |
40794 | Which of the three doctrines is to be regarded as the legitimate exponent of the procedure of thought manifested in modern science? |
40794 | Who are the"we,"and what does"own"mean, and how is ownership established? |
40794 | Why is there a task of transformation? |
40794 | Why so uneven, so partial, in your attitude toward ubiquitous relations? |
40794 | Why, it will be asked, does a man buy a suit of clothes unless that is a value, or at least a proximate means to a further value? |
40794 | but, How shall I think right_ here and now_? |
40665 | Is the correspondence reached between idea and object the precise correspondence that the idea itself intended? 40665 Again must we ask: On what basis is this object in the absolute system selected at all? 40665 And by the time all this is performed what sort of a representation of reality is the idea? 40665 And now, finally, what shall mark the attainment of this purpose of the idea to correspond and representits own completed form"? |
40665 | And what in their operations marks the difference between truth and error? |
40665 | Because there could be other cases of counting, and other numbers counted than the present counting process shows you, and why so? |
40665 | But does not Bosanquet himself point out a pathway which, if followed farther, would reach a more satisfactory view of the realm of knowledge? |
40665 | But granted that this is all true, what has it to do with the origin of the hypothesis? |
40665 | But has this distinction between the content of an experience and its existence solved the problem of how we_ know_ reality? |
40665 | But how can we know that the expression is"fragmentary"unless we have some experience of wholeness? |
40665 | But how did it happen that it did not take the form:"This is not cake"? |
40665 | But how do you prove it? |
40665 | But how does he know that reality is continuous, and that the real world is an organized system? |
40665 | But how is this possible if reality lies without or beyond our act of judging? |
40665 | But if all this is admitted, what becomes of the possibility of knowledge? |
40665 | But if this reconstruction and response were to follow at once, would there be any clearly defined act of judging at all? |
40665 | But if thought just accepts its material, how can there be any distinctive aim or activity of thought at all? |
40665 | But if we do test it, is not such test enough? |
40665 | But is it a question of merest chance which of these various possibilities is actualized? |
40665 | But is this necessary? |
40665 | But just where does our contact with the real occur? |
40665 | But the question to be answered first is: When would such a"statement"occur in the course of our experience? |
40665 | But they part company when a fundamental question is raised: Is all organized meaning the work of thought? |
40665 | But what precisely is the form and seat of the aphasia? |
40665 | But whence comes this restlessness and dissatisfaction? |
40665 | But why should this activity get into a condition to be described as"indefinite restlessness"and dissatisfaction? |
40665 | But why? |
40665 | But, as the first statement of internal meaning implies, how can one have a purpose to sing the melody except in and through the idea? |
40665 | Did he, then, either contribute to the proof of a general law or discover further characteristics of things already known in a more general way? |
40665 | Does this coequal presence guarantee an objectivity? |
40665 | Does this mean that the"idea"is wholly independent of the"image"? |
40665 | Does this phase of the moon really mean rain, or does it just happen that the rain- storm comes when the moon has reached this phase? |
40665 | Has it diagnosed the case properly, and is it therefore one in and through which these activities can operate and come to unity again? |
40665 | Has it gained in validity in ceasing to be an independent myth, in becoming an element in systematized myth? |
40665 | Has it not disarmed itself? |
40665 | How can conceptualism prevent the union? |
40665 | How can one maintain that in a literal and concrete physical sense gold in process of solution is the"same"as gold entering into chemical combination? |
40665 | How can the former in any sense give a check or test of the value of the latter? |
40665 | How can thought compare its own contents with that which is wholly outside itself? |
40665 | How can we ever be sure that the fact which we have discovered will stand the test of further thought- constructions? |
40665 | How do we know the same is not the case with the ideas which are the product of our most deliberate and extended scientific inquiry? |
40665 | How does it know which to eliminate as irrelevant and which to confirm as grounded? |
40665 | How does the real world get representation in experience, and what is the guarantee that the representation, when obtained, is correct? |
40665 | How does thought know which of the combinations are merely coincident and which are merely coherent? |
40665 | How otherwise can we explain, for example, the action of an expert ball- player? |
40665 | How shall it secure this? |
40665 | How shall we describe it? |
40665 | How, after all, does even the ideally perfect valid thought apply or refer to reality? |
40665 | How, the implication runs, could reflection become generalized save by elimination of details as irrelevant? |
40665 | How, then, can it serve as the subject of a judgment? |
40665 | How, then, does it obtain its characteristic of universality? |
40665 | How, then, does this fact of past assignment to uses still recognized as desirable figure in the situation? |
40665 | If it is essential, then how explain the fact that its parts do not fall outside one another in time? |
40665 | If it is not essential, then how explain the evident fact that the judgment as an intellectual process does have duration? |
40665 | If so, what is this something else? |
40665 | If the experiment with the pendulum only substituted exactness for inexactness, did the Copernican theory do anything different in_ kind_? |
40665 | In other words, what does this restlessness mean? |
40665 | In other words, what is the significance of the demand for the particular judgment? |
40665 | In the end the one problem holds: How do the specifications of thought as such hold good of reality as such? |
40665 | In the introduction we have been told, as a matter of description, that the internal meanings do seek the external meaning, but why do they? |
40665 | In the last analysis the problem always is: What is to be done here and now with the actual material at hand, under the present conditions? |
40665 | In what sense, with reference to what, is it incomplete and fragmentary? |
40665 | Is it a general claim which thought_ qua_ thought puts forth, or is it the claim of the content of some particular thought? |
40665 | Is it begging the question to speak of consciousness as exercising a selective function with reference to stimuli? |
40665 | Is the reality we now have the same that we had to begin with? |
40665 | Is this thinking? |
40665 | Is this to be taken in a static or in a dynamic way? |
40665 | Just what are we to understand by this"fragmentary"and"indeterminate"character of the internal meaning? |
40665 | Mr. Bosanquet raises the question: Are there at all ideas which are not symbolic?... |
40665 | Must we not here fall back on something like a pre- established harmony? |
40665 | Must you not just dogmatically say that that world must agree with your negations? |
40665 | Not what is the test of thought at large, but what validates and confirms_ this_ thought? |
40665 | Now, any idea that is affirmed is referred to reality, but do ideas exist which are not being affirmed? |
40665 | Now, at what point does this act begin? |
40665 | Now, how shall we discriminate the ethical and the economic aspects of the situation which we have described? |
40665 | On the other hand, if truth is to be found in the immediate experience, can it here be preserved from the blighting effects of thought? |
40665 | Or, in a word: What is the"jurisdiction"of the economic point of view? |
40665 | Perhaps some one has been startled, and asks:"What is this noise?" |
40665 | So that our question now becomes: What is the significance of this factor of restless, dissatisfied consciousness in activity? |
40665 | Still the query haunts us: Is this so in truth? |
40665 | That is to say, at this point the question is: Does the plan apply to the activities actually involved in the unrest? |
40665 | That is to say: Does it express the fact that a given content or meaning is_ de facto_ presented to the consciousness of all alike? |
40665 | The more specific question is: How does the particular functional situation termed the reflective behave? |
40665 | The purposive character of experience is of course very manifest, but what is the significance of this purposing in experience as a whole? |
40665 | The question remains: Why, if there is no opposition, should there be any uncertainty? |
40665 | The significance of these may be doubted: Do they_ mean_ real change in the sun or in the earth? |
40665 | Under these conditions we get such questions as the following: What is the relation of rational thought to crude or unreflective experience? |
40665 | Under what circumstances, then, are we conscious of stimuli in their capacity of guides or incentives or grounds of conduct? |
40665 | Under what conditions, then, is this suspense and uncertainty possible? |
40665 | We can lay out alternative courses beforehand, but the point of difficulty lies here:"But just which is he?" |
40665 | What alliance, or_ mésalliance_, may they not form, one with the other? |
40665 | What can we mean, then, by calling some of our ideas true and others false? |
40665 | What does this mean save that judgment is developmental, transitive, in effect and purport? |
40665 | What have you, then, but an elementary and primitive type of reflex action? |
40665 | What here becomes of the distinction between immediate and mediating experience? |
40665 | What is meant by"further research shows universally, perhaps, that No A is B"? |
40665 | What is the agent''s apprehension of the matter? |
40665 | What is the barrier which prevents reason from complete penetration into the world of truth? |
40665 | What is the function, then, of the representative image? |
40665 | What is the matter? |
40665 | What is the relation between it and the immediate experience? |
40665 | What is the relation of thought to reality? |
40665 | What is the relative value of each in experience as a whole? |
40665 | What is the significance and basis of universality and necessity as confined merely to the realm of internal meaning? |
40665 | What is the source and the material of the purposes? |
40665 | What is the test of the reality of the bread, and the truth of the judgment? |
40665 | What is the validity of the various forms of thinking which find expression in the various types of judgment and in the various forms of inference? |
40665 | What is their relation to truth and error? |
40665 | What is to be done? |
40665 | What is, however, the ground of distinction between the presented objects? |
40665 | What kind of"research,"internal or external, can show this? |
40665 | What predicate-- so we may formulate their question-- should be given to the subject? |
40665 | What shall we say of the validity of such processes? |
40665 | What then is the nature and source of this apprehension of end or means as valuable? |
40665 | What we have to reckon with is not the problem of, How can I think_ überhaupt_? |
40665 | What, then, in this action already going on is responsible for this restlessness? |
40665 | What, then, is the real difference between hypothesis and expectation? |
40665 | When is the correspondence and representation true? |
40665 | When is this purpose of the idea to correspond with its absolute, final, and completed form fulfilled, or partially fulfilled? |
40665 | When we ask,"What rains?" |
40665 | Why does it seek an object? |
40665 | Why does it want to cross the chasm? |
40665 | Why have we to reckon with it at all? |
40665 | Why is there a task of transformation? |
40665 | Why should not we also enjoy an original relation to the universe? |
40665 | Why should not we have a poetry and philosophy of insight and not of tradition, and a religion by revelation to us and not the history of theirs?" |
40665 | Why suppose that by distorting reality we get it in shape to affirm_ of_ reality? |
40665 | Why would they not all remain in conflict and continue to check any positive result? |
40665 | Why, then, should there be a demand for the external meaning, for a further object? |
40665 | Why? |
40665 | Will it enable me to support and educate my family? |
40665 | Will it permit me to devote sufficient attention to their present care and training? |
40665 | Will this life of social agitation really be quite"respectable,"and befitting the character of a sober and industrious man? |
40665 | [ 186] But what is it that we"experience within"which makes us call this judgment necessary? |
40665 | [ 198] If at this point one asks: Whence this absolute system of ideas? |
40665 | _ The predicate as hypothesis._--Suppose, then, the hypothesis is a predicate; is the predicate necessarily a hypothesis? |
40665 | but, How shall I think right_ here and now_? |
31796 | An honest man''s the noblest work of God: Z is an honest man: therefore, he is-- what? |
31796 | Are good administrators always good speakers? |
31796 | But you have admitted that it is possible for Socrates not to fly? |
31796 | Can you tell me in the face of chronology,a leading statesman once asked,"that the Crimes Act of 1887 did not diminish disorder in Ireland?" |
31796 | Do? 31796 Doing what, did you say? |
31796 | Has the practice of excessive drinking ceased in your part of the country? |
31796 | Have all ratepayers a vote? |
31796 | Have you left off beating your father? |
31796 | How do I feel? 31796 How do you do?" |
31796 | I mean, how do you feel? |
31796 | Is it possible for Socrates to fly? |
31796 | Is it possible for him to walk? |
31796 | Is not the honourable honourable, and the base base? |
31796 | No, no; I mean, how do you find yourself? |
31796 | Then why did you not say so? 31796 When you say that it is possible for a man to do anything do you not believe that it is possible for him to do it?" |
31796 | ( 1)_ Are they properly called Syllogisms?_ This is purely a question of Method and Definition. |
31796 | Ailing? |
31796 | All at once or step by step? |
31796 | An experiment is a proof or trial: of what? |
31796 | And is not, therefore, the proper form of proposition Some S is P? |
31796 | And who is to instruct us in the full meaning? |
31796 | And why is there this complete agreement? |
31796 | Are we to include it in the Predicate term or in the Subject term? |
31796 | But according to what differences? |
31796 | But any logical advantage-- any help to thinking? |
31796 | But do they hang together? |
31796 | But do we in reality conclude it from the proposition, All men are mortal?" |
31796 | But how, it may be asked, can the concept remain the same? |
31796 | But is this principle really all that we assume? |
31796 | But there are cases where friends are deceived for their own good: are these cases of injustice? |
31796 | But what of propositions that the plain man would at once recognise as Verbal? |
31796 | But who was the founder of the New Logic? |
31796 | But why did Aristotle consider it necessary to lay down a principle so obvious? |
31796 | But why did he desire to concatenate this with the old Logic? |
31796 | But why is it that a man can not get rid of an idea? |
31796 | But, Whately argued, how do we know that this, that and the other-- the individuals we have examined-- constitute the whole class? |
31796 | CAN ALL PROPOSITIONS BE REDUCED TO THE SYLLOGISTIC FORM? |
31796 | Calling this unity, this one in the many, the Universal(_ Universale_,[ Greek: to pan]), what is the Universal_ ontologically_? |
31796 | Can a fallacy in argument be detected at once? |
31796 | Can it be accounted for most probably by supposing the event stated to have really occurred with all the circumstances alleged? |
31796 | Can the definition be that a man who deceives his friends is unjust? |
31796 | Can the leopard change his spots? |
31796 | Can those degrees be measured numerically? |
31796 | Common nouns are put in the First Category because they are predicated in answer to the question, What is this? |
31796 | Do we not assume that what belongs to the individuals examined belongs to the whole class? |
31796 | Do what?" |
31796 | Does Logic shelter the quibbler who trades upon it? |
31796 | Does any analogous use for the Syllogism remain? |
31796 | Does common- sense inspect the argument in a lump or piecemeal? |
31796 | Does he admit this? |
31796 | Does it help to prevent error, to clear up confusion? |
31796 | Does it lead to firmer conceptions of the truth? |
31796 | Does the ox ruminate? |
31796 | Does this mean that it is not possible for Socrates to fly, or that it is possible for Socrates not to fly? |
31796 | Does this not come to the same thing? |
31796 | Does this theory not do away with all possibility of defining and fixing concepts? |
31796 | E 5 concentric circles of S and P- P in centre I?] |
31796 | Each of them probably works some fraction of the total change observable, but how are they to be disentangled? |
31796 | Especially to the presence of lime or magnesia? |
31796 | For example, what is the meaning of injustice? |
31796 | For what purpose? |
31796 | Ginger- aleing?" |
31796 | Given perplexity as to the cause of any phenomenon, what is our natural first step? |
31796 | Good seed was sown: whence, then, come the tares? |
31796 | Has the unity that it represents among individuals no existence except in the mind? |
31796 | Have such names a connotation? |
31796 | His question was, When is a Respondent bound to admit a general conclusion? |
31796 | How are men to be brought to accept loyally the judgment of the expert in public affairs? |
31796 | How did the Aristotelian Logic originate? |
31796 | How do we know that the nineteen moods are the only possible forms of valid syllogism? |
31796 | How do you proceed? |
31796 | How is it conceived? |
31796 | How is it continued? |
31796 | How is it to be averted? |
31796 | How is its signification conceived? |
31796 | How is the unity maintained? |
31796 | How then, do we ordinarily proceed in conceiving, if we can not picture the common attributes alone and apart from particulars? |
31796 | How would it proceed? |
31796 | How? |
31796 | How? |
31796 | If we refuse the name of Induction to the general proposition of fact, what are we to call it? |
31796 | If you admit the first two, are you bound in consistency to admit the third? |
31796 | If, proceeding on this, I go on to ask:"Then they are paved with granite or asphalt, or this or that?" |
31796 | In how many ways may this relation be established through a third term? |
31796 | In ignoring this implication, does Logic oppose this implication as erroneous? |
31796 | In the case of Mill''s system we have to ask: What first moved him to formulate the methods of scientific investigation? |
31796 | In what circumstances did Aristotle invent these? |
31796 | In what circumstances did it originate? |
31796 | In what form would it be so? |
31796 | Is Logic then really useless, or even misleading, inasmuch as it ignores the definite implication of negatives in ordinary thought and speech? |
31796 | Is S in or out of P, and is it wholly in or wholly out or partly in or partly out? |
31796 | Is common- sense sufficient? |
31796 | Is it a copy of some particular impression, or a confused blur or blend of many? |
31796 | Is it good then to be disillusioned? |
31796 | Is it one of that class? |
31796 | Is it the case that no man can live without sleep? |
31796 | Is it, then, impossible to decide between these alternative possibilities of causation? |
31796 | Is the explanation then to be found in some special adaptability of the religious system to the character of the people? |
31796 | Is the predicate applicable to All victories or only to Some? |
31796 | Is the subject of the conclusion contained in the subject of the general principle when the two have identical predicates? |
31796 | Is the truth of the conclusion a necessary consequence of the truth of the premisses? |
31796 | Is there a place for it as a safeguard against error in modern debate? |
31796 | Is there any advantage in this? |
31796 | Is there then no way of ascertaining historical fact? |
31796 | Is this not, it may be asked, to confuse thought and being, to resolve Socrates into a string of words? |
31796 | Is war one of the things that increase taxation? |
31796 | It is to be observed that for this operation we do not practically use the syllogistic form All S is P. We do not raise the question Is All S, P? |
31796 | Must we reject history as altogether unworthy of credit? |
31796 | Now the psychological question about the Universal is, What is this conception? |
31796 | Occam himself speaks of the subject as the primary signification, and the attribute as the secondary, because the answer to"What is white?" |
31796 | Passing by these remoter questions, we may give the answers of the three extreme schools to the ontological question, What is a Universal? |
31796 | Psychologically, then, the theory is sound: what is its logical value? |
31796 | Put the question"Is Socrates wise?" |
31796 | Romeo must be in love: for is he not seventeen? |
31796 | Should he coin new names, or should he take old names and try to fit them with new definitions? |
31796 | Should this be expressed as A or I? |
31796 | Such a decrease took place_ post hoc_; was it_ propter hoc_? |
31796 | Suppose a man deceives his enemies, is there any injustice in that? |
31796 | Suppose we doubt whether a given agent is or is not capable of producing a certain effect in certain circumstances, how do we put it to the proof? |
31796 | Suppose we want to know whether a particular conclusion is consistent with our memorandum, what have we to look to? |
31796 | Suppose yourself the Questioner, where did he profess to help you with his mechanism? |
31796 | The categories are exhaustive, but do they fulfil another requisite of a good division-- are they mutually exclusive? |
31796 | The first thing that an inquirer naturally asks when confronted by numerous instances of a phenomenon is, What have they in common? |
31796 | The goat? |
31796 | The logical question is, Has the view any advantage for logical purposes? |
31796 | The psychological question is, Is this a correct theory of how men actually think when they make propositions? |
31796 | The question has been raised, For how long can oral tradition be trusted? |
31796 | The question has sometimes been asked, Where should we begin in Logic? |
31796 | The question, Who are to be placed together? |
31796 | The sheep? |
31796 | The statement at least is extant: our first question is, What is the most rational way of accounting for it? |
31796 | The type of a general proposition in Syllogistic terminology is the Major Premiss, All M is P. What is the type of the particulars that it sums up? |
31796 | To raise the question: What is the proper form for a Modal of Possibility, A or I? |
31796 | Was it due to the character of the drinking- water? |
31796 | Was it due to the geological formation? |
31796 | We may ask, further, What is there in nature that the general name signifies? |
31796 | We see the nature of the proof relied upon when we ask, How far must elimination be carried in order to attain proof of causal connexion? |
31796 | What about the selection of the names? |
31796 | What are the exact attributes signified by the names? |
31796 | What cat''s averse to fish? |
31796 | What corresponds to it in the real world? |
31796 | What does a general name signify? |
31796 | What follows? |
31796 | What is a belief? |
31796 | What is he ailing? |
31796 | What is implied in saying"No"to such propositions put interrogatively? |
31796 | What is in the mind when we employ a general name? |
31796 | What is its relation to reality? |
31796 | What is meant by giving the answer"No"to a proposition put interrogatively? |
31796 | What is the Universal psychologically? |
31796 | What is the conclusion, and in what Figure and Mood may the argument be expressed? |
31796 | What is the interpretation of"No"? |
31796 | What is the respondent committed to thereby? |
31796 | What is the signification_ psychologically_? |
31796 | What is there in our minds corresponding to the general name when we utter it? |
31796 | What is this concept in thought? |
31796 | What meanings of"custom"and of"sensibility"will reconcile these apparently conflicting examples? |
31796 | What principle of sound conclusion was involved in it? |
31796 | What use did he contemplate for them? |
31796 | What will be the issue of a coming war? |
31796 | When are propositions incompatible? |
31796 | When do they imply one another? |
31796 | When do two imply a third? |
31796 | When is the opponent bound to admit that all horned animals ruminate? |
31796 | When is this inductive argument complete? |
31796 | When it is said that"Victories may be gained by accident,"is the predicate made concerning All victories or Some only? |
31796 | When we say,"This is a man,"do we not declare what sort of a thing he is? |
31796 | Whence did he derive his materials? |
31796 | Where did Aristotle begin? |
31796 | Where did the founder of Logic begin? |
31796 | Where does the common pattern come from? |
31796 | Where is the fixed scheme of division there? |
31796 | Which party will win in the next election? |
31796 | Why are things essentially like one another? |
31796 | Why describe Logic as a system of defence against error? |
31796 | Why did he give his scientific method the form of a supplement to the old Aristotelian Logic? |
31796 | Why do we believe more confidently in some uniformities than in others? |
31796 | Why do we dip our pens in ink, and expect the application of them to white paper to be followed by a black mark? |
31796 | Why do we not look for it in another wall? |
31796 | Why does it force itself upon him as a belief? |
31796 | Why is it endemic in some localities and not in others? |
31796 | Why is this? |
31796 | Why lay down principles so obvious, in some interpretations, and so manifestly sophistical in others? |
31796 | Why not rather say, as is now usual, that its end is the attainment of truth? |
31796 | Why say that its main end and aim is the organisation of reason against confusion and falsehood? |
31796 | Why would a reported breach of one be regarded with more incredulity than that of another? |
31796 | Will a patient in the crisis of a given disease recover or not? |
31796 | Would you call these men unjust? |
31796 | Would you say that the man who cheats or deceives is unjust? |
31796 | You know how each of them lies toward the third: when can you tell from this how S lies towards P? |
31796 | _ Best_ for what purpose? |
31796 | _ Examples for Analysis._ Scarlet flowers have no fragrance: this flower has no fragrance: does it follow that this flower is of a scarlet colour? |
31796 | do we not declare his Quality? |
31796 | or"Is this paper white?" |