Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
A614101697?-1712?
A61410Plung''d by the Holy Baptist''s Hand, Buried in thee our SAVIOUR lies: Did not thy Waters wondring stand, To see Him die, and see Him rise?
A61410Thus it becomes us to fulfil"All Righteousness, he meekly said: Why shou''d we then to do his Will Or be asham''d, or be afraid?
A61410What greater Glory would''st thou have, Than CHRIST descending from thy Shore, To find in thee a liquid Grave?
A61410Wing conjectures imprint date of 1697?.
A61410[ 2], 16 p. printed for John Marshall, at the Bible in Grace- church- street, London:[ 1725?]
A37493But have so many Ages erred, that have used Water- Baptism?
A37493Know ye not that somany of us as are Baptized into Iesus Christ, are Baptized into his Death?
A44168And who can esteem these poor and mean things?
A44168What then do they do?
A44168Who, but must highly Value, and with all his Powers attempt to obtain them?
A44168Who, of any Sense and Thought, can count them Indifferent?
A44168Would we then perfect our Repentance, and be truly Welcome to our Lord and Saviour in His House and Family?
A3870217. as if he should say is not this the spirituall intent and true meaning or signification thereof?
A38702And Saint Paul likewise saith of the same Sacrament; The cup of blessing which wee blesse is it not the communion of the Blood of Christ?
A38702But why should it so much grieve me, or trouble them?
A38702[ London?
A38702and the Bread which wee breake is it not the communion of the Body of Christ?
A38702doth it not shew forth and give us to understand the Communion that is betweene Christ and his Church and every member of it?
A65838And did not all Types Figures, and Shadows end in Christ the substance?
A65838Did you ever hear such a doctrine before, that the baptism of the Spirit is the Spirit?
A65838How poorly do these Baptists Argue for Water Baptism to Continue?
A65838Rep. To this I say, what a silly shift is this, as also what falsehood is in it?
A65838To this I say, besides the falsehood of these two charges upon us, what absurdity is intimated in them?
A65838What falshood and confusion is here?
A65838What is this man but ignorant of the baptism of the Spirit, when you may see here he can not distinguish between the Spirit and the baptism of it?
A65838Where did the Disciples of Christ give the Spirit unto any, seeing it was the work of Christ alone to baptise with the Spirit?
A65838Where provest thou that S. B?
A65838a Teaching Disciple, and 2d ▪ a Teaching Disciple,( what no ● cense is here?)
A65838how Ignorant and full of gross darkness it self art thou S. Bradley?
A65838what confusion and darkness hath this Baptist about this uttered?
A95331And what hinders here?
A95331But how do we enter into this?
A95331For what need is there of that Baptism that can onely cleanse the flesh and the body?
A95331For why may not Infants be stipulated for as well as we?
A95331For, as the Eunuch said to Philip, What hinders them to be baptized?
A95331If they be renewed by the Spirit, what hinders them to be baptized, who receive the holy Ghost as well as we?
A95331In the mean time, to what Scriptures did they appeal?
A95331It remains now, that we inquire what concerns our duty, and in what persons, or in what dispositions Baptism produces all these glorious effects?
A95331Now how can they partake of Christs death, but by Baptism into his death?
A95331Or can not a gift be presented to God by the hands of the owners, and the gift become holy and pleasing to God without its own consent?
A95331This we are taught by S. Paul, Know ye not that so many of us as are baptized into Jesus Christ, were baptized into his death?
A95331by the analogy or proportion of what writings did they end their Questions?
A95331can not a creeple receive an alms at the Beautiful gate of the Temple, unless he go thither himself?
A95331pro, Annon ita credimus quia omn ● g ● nus peccati cùm ad salutare lavacrum venimus aufertur?
A95331what need Innocents hasten to the remission of sins?
A95331whence did they prove their Articles?
A63778And what hinders here?
A63778Annon ita credimur quia omne genus peccati cùm ad salutare lavacrum venimus aufertur?
A63778But how doe we enter into this?
A63778For what need is there of that Baptism that can onely cleanse the flesh and the body?
A63778For why may not Infants be stipulated for as well as we?
A63778For, as the Eunuch said to Philip, What hinders them to be baptized?
A63778If they be renewed by the Spirit, what hinders them to be baptized, who receive the holy Ghost as well as we?
A63778In the mean time, to what Scriptures did they appeal?
A63778It remains now, that we enquire what concerns our duty, and in what persons, or in what dispositions Baptism produces all these glorious effects?
A63778Now how can they partake of Christs death, but by Baptism into his death?
A63778Or can not a gift be presented to God by the hands of the owners, and the gift become holy and pleasing to God without its own consent?
A63778This we are taught by Saul, Know ye not that so many of us as are baptized into Iesus Christ were baptized into his death?
A63778by the analogy or proportion of what writings did they end their Questions?
A63778can not a creeple receive an almes at the Beautiful gate of the Temple, unlesse he goe thither himself?
A63778what need Innocents hasten to the remission of sins?
A63778whence did they prove their Articles?
A236643.3 Are ye so foolish, having began in the spirit, are ye now made perfect by the flesh?
A23664And how shall they hear without a Preacher?
A23664And how shall they preach except they be sent?
A23664And if it be demanded how long?
A23664And if they escaped not who refused Moses that spake on earth, how shal they escape which shall refuse Christ which speaketh from heaven?
A23664But how did twelve Apostles think we in their own persons carry the Gospel to every man and woman under Heaven?
A23664For had ye beleeved Moses, ye would have beleeved me, for he wrote of me, but if ye beleeve not his writings, how shall ye beleeve my words?
A23664How can they( saith he) beleeve in him of whom they have not heard?
A23664How did he speak to them but by his Epistle?
A23664How or by what means are the Prophets ministers to us of this Grace, but by their writings?
A23664How then shall they call on him in whom they have not beleeved?
A23664The question is, what power any man hath in these days to administer Baptism?
A23664Then why should not the written Gospel in this case, as wel be a rule and ground to us?
A23664VVhether Gospel Ordinances are things Spirituall, or but Carnall?
A23664VVhether a power to Preach by immediate Revelation of the Spirit, be necessary in every Gospel Minister?
A23664VVhether a power to preach by immediate revelation of the spirit, be necessary in every Gospel minister?, IIII.
A23664VVhether a power to preach by immediate revelation of the spirit, be necessary in every Gospel minister?, IIII.
A23664Were they reproved for leaving off the work till they had Prophets sent to quicken them?
A23664and how shall they beleeve in him of whom they have not heard, and how shall they hear without a preacher?
A23664and how shall they preach except they be sent?
A23664how, or why else should he desire Baptism up on Philips preaching?
A23664or that it was a thing indifferent to be baptized or not baptized?
A23664or that mens having the Spirit, though in an excellent degree, as they had, is any excuse from water Baptism?
A23664will not every man conclude that Philip, in preaching the Gospel to him, had convinced him of it as a Christian duty?
A9473911, 12. and so to be used as it was?
A9473911. Who are appointed to Baptize?
A9473916, 17, 18. to make every believer a blessing, so as to cast ordinarily Elect children on Elect parents, and thereby warranted Infant Baptism?
A9473916, 17. a warrant to Baptize Infants?
A9473916. be understood of some other Baptism then that of water?
A9473919. the Disciples to Baptize children with parents, as the Jews did Proselytes?
A9473933.?
A9473938, 39. exhort the Jews to Baptize themselves and their children, because the promise of grace is to believers and their children?
A947394 May it not be meant of Baptizing by the Spirit, or afflictions?
A947397. to be a God to him and his seed?
A94739Are not Infants of believers Disciples, by their Parents faith to be Baptized?
A94739Are not believers children comprehended under the promise, to be a God to Abraham and his seed?
A94739Are not the Gentile believers children to be ingraffed by Baptism with their Parents, as the Jews children were by Circumcision?
A94739Are not the Sacraments of the Christian, Church in their nature, seals of the Covenant of grace?
A94739Are the persons to be Baptized altogether passive in their Baptism?
A94739Are they rightly Baptized, who are Baptized into the name of Jesus Christ, though no other person be named?
A94739Did Circumcision seal the Gospel covenant?
A94739Had it not been a discomfort to the believing Jews to have their children unbaptized, and so out of Covenant?
A94739Have not opposers of Infant Baptism, been wicked in the end?
A94739Have not our children then less priviledge then the Jews had?
A94739How came Infant Baptism to be common in the Christian Churches?
A94739IS Baptism with water an Ordinance of Christ, to be continued by his Disciples till the end of the World?
A94739Is not the Infant Baptism sufficient if it be avouched at age?
A94739Is not the end of the world, as much as the end of that age?
A94739Is there any evil in it?
A94739Is there any good by Baptizing persons at age, which might not be, though Infant Baptism were continued?
A94739May not the sprinkling or powring water on the face, be the Baptism of Christ?
A94739May we be said to be compleat as the Jews without infant baptism?
A94739Was not the Covenant with Abraham, Gen. 17. the Covenant of grace?
A94739What are Christians to do when they are Baptized?
A94739What is it to Baptize into the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost?
A94739What is the Baptizing appointed by Jesus Christ?
A94739What is the chief end of Baptism?
A94739Whom are they appointed to Baptize?
A94739Why did Paul then say, Christ sent him not to Baptize?
A94739Why should not Infants be Baptized sith they were Circumcised?
A41822And he said unto th ● m, Vnto what then were ye Baptized?
A41822And how must we do to know it?
A41822And now you Water- Baptists, let me ask, Now where is Iohn''s Power?
A41822And though you may say, All are not sent to Baptize; Then I ask you, How must we do to know who are, and who are not?
A41822Baptism?
A41822But although you should still say, Why then did the Apostles use it after the Spirit''s Baptism was accomplisht?
A41822But further, you acknowledge your selves that it is but a Type; well, I ask you then, What doth it type forth unto us; or what is it a Type of?
A41822But they might have said, Why John, why must thou Decrease?
A41822For if it did not reach Paul, who was Converted, and one not behind the Apostles, how can it reach you?
A41822God forbid; for to us there is but One Lord: And he doth not say, There is but One Faith; must we therefore say, There are more Faiths then One?
A41822How then?
A41822If it be a Type of the Baptism of Christ, then I ask you, What further need is there of it, when the Thing signified by it is come?
A41822It will one day be said, Who hath required these things at your Hands?
A41822No, nor he doth not say, There is but One Lord; must we therefore say, There are more Lords then One?
A41822Now I conclude, that the Dead you mean, are such as are Dead to Sin; and if so, how can ye that are dead to Sin live any longer therein?
A41822Now it s plainly said, that as Iohn fulfilled his Course, he said, Whom think ye that I am?
A41822Or can any Man conclude, that Paul here speaks of Water- Baptism?
A41822Or do you think that the Type and Substance must remain together to the World''s End?
A41822Shew us your Commission; Where did you receive your Power and Authority in this Matter, that you both preach and baptize?
A41822The Apostles never called it as you do, An Initiating Ordinance, and( say you) A Command of Christ: But who say so beside you?
A41822The People came to John, and asked him, saying unto him, Why Baptizest thou, if thou be not that Christ, neither Elias, nor that Prophet?
A41822Was it not always from the Foundation of the Law, that when the Substance came, that the Shadows fled away?
A41822Well, But he comes to thee, to be baptized of thee?
A41822Well, Iohn; And what will he do for us?
A41822Where do you prove it?
A41822Who commanded you?
A41822Will not he Baptize with Water?
A41822Yes; but Iohn forbad him, saying, I have need to be Baptized of thee, and comest thou to me?
A41822[ Mark] Had Iohn''s Baptism been in the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost, then how should they but have heard of a Holy Ghost?
A41822do you think that he baptized them with the Holy Ghost, and then sent them out to baptize with Water?
A41822have you this Hole to creep out at?
A41822nor wholely preach his Baptism useless, nor the Law neither, until such time as the Gospel had got some hold of the People?
A41822what would you have?
A41822who ever sent you Baptists in this great and notable Day of the Lord?
A41822who would not live in her?
A41822who, who would not dwell here?
A4716728. in his discourse of Witchcraft: How may the People of New- England relish this?
A47167And if I by Belzebub cast out Devils, by whom do your Children cast them out?
A47167And if Sathan cast out Sathan, he is divided against himself, how shall then his Kingdom stand?
A47167And if he say, It was because the Devil had left her, how soon she came there, Why may not the same be alledged on behalf of the Quakers Meetings?
A47167And who saith all Light is God?
A47167And why are ye not as zealous for washing one anothers feet, and anointing the sick with Oyl?
A47167But is a bare Report or Hear- say sufficient to discredit a Passage that is known to so many living Witnesses in that Town?
A47167But what saith the People of New- England now to Cotton Mather, who doth so accuse them?
A47167But what then?
A47167But why should the colour of black be judged by Cotton Mather so much to resemble the Devil?
A47167Can there be any inward power of Godliness, without Christ living, dwelling and ruling in the heart?
A47167Doth it therefore follow, that Diabolical Possession in this Damsel did incline her to be of Pauls Religion?
A47167Doth not both thy Fathers weakness and thine also manifestly appear in this Charge?
A47167Hast thou no other way to defend thy Idol of Water- baptism, but to smite against the Lord Jesus Christ, in his inward appearance in his Saints?
A47167Hath not God many ways to reveal himself to the ouls of men, and the depth of his Counsel, that passeth our search and understanding?
A47167Have there not been mad People, and whimsical both of the Presbyterian and Independent Churches?
A47167Here thy scoffing airy Spirit appeareth, as oft else- where; how can the world be blessed with a Volumn of Heresies and Blasphemies?
A47167I Answer; Then why dost thou not produce this twefth Article, and demonstrate it so to be, as thou affirmest?
A47167I am sure more expresly commanded by Christ, and Iames the Apostle, than your Water baptism?
A47167If I grant thee that both Iohn''s preaching and baptism, in a true sence, is a beginning of the Gospel, what gainest thou by it?
A47167If this be a Light flowing from God, and a Ministration of God, how can it fail in any respect, and be insufficient?
A47167Is not this worse than that call''d Abbington Law, where it is said, Men were first hanged and afterwards tryed?
A47167Now, what sayst thou, Cotton Mather, to this?
A47167To this I answered; What can all this say to discredit the Quakers Religion and Principle?
A47167To this thou answerest, not denying, but that a Possession of evil Spirits may befall one of your Communion: What then?
A47167and as it is in Iob, When the Sons of God came together, Sathan also came among them?
A47167doth it therefore follow that Water- baptism is a pure Gospel Precept, and to be observed to the end of the world?
A47167doth it therefore follow that they are owned by that People, or are of their Society?
A47167let them see to it, and if they be not guilty of his Charge, whether is he not severely to be reprehended?
A47167must they also by Cotton Mathers Authority be like unto the Devil?
A41790& c. As these things can not be denied, so we may justly enquire how it comes to pass that they do thus?
A41790( meaning for things indifferent) Therefore who art thou that judgest another mans Servant?
A4179010. or be Pauls fellow- souldiers and fellow Labourers?
A417902. and is that which we call a Doctrin ● of Christ?
A417902. may not be figuratively understood, for the Holy Spirit which was given thereby?
A4179020. of which Christ in the same place is said to be the corner stone?
A417902?
A41790Acts 19. having no such blessing to communicate, as they had?
A41790Again, It would be understood how long the power our brethren gives to men to act as Elders in those Congregations doth remain?
A41790And also how many several Congregations they may act in as Pastours by consent?
A41790And he[ that is Jesus] said unto them[ that is his Disciples] what things?
A41790And here let me seriously ask our Brethren, what manner of instruction they give young Disciples, concerning this matter?
A41790And here we will take notice of your demand, Where the Apostles Laid Hands upon any after they had received the Holy Ghost?
A41790And how much comes this short of the power committed to any messenger in the World at this day?
A41790And what devourer shall we be able to keep out( that hath but craft to get in) if once this door of dispensing with principles of Religion be opened?
A41790Because others are gone before, is it a shame for us to come after?
A41790But then I would know, how we can rightly own that principle, if we destroy the practick part?
A41790But what shall we say, do none attain to all the principles, nor to every part of the foundation, but such as fall after Baptism?
A41790But what shall we say, shall we render railing for railing?
A41790But why dost thou judge thy Brother, or set at nought thy Brother?
A41790But why so?
A41790But why so?
A41790Doubtless he ought; yet who can imagine, that such gifts as Tongues, Miracles,& c. should be given to each individual?
A41790For if you deem them to be no Churches at all, what need any debate be had, Whether it be orderly or safe to communicate with them at the Lords Table?
A41790For, do they not frequently send out men to act Authoritatively both in preaching the Gospel to them that are without?
A41790Have ye received the Holy Ghost SINCE ye believed?
A41790Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed?
A41790How might Paul and Silvanus have been burthensome?
A41790Insomuch then he obtained not that, how came he by the Holy Ghost?
A41790It had certainly made nul ● that ordinance almost totally, for who doth not now a- days presently suppose himself to be baptized with the Spiri ●?
A41790It were strange now if our Lord Christ should have none to withstand these, if need be with an are they Apostles?
A41790Must we then conclude, that there is no agreement between their prayer, and the prayer of the Church in those dayes?
A41790Our Brethren demand of us, whether those qualifications which gives right to B ● ptism, do not give right to the Lords Table?
A41790Shall mortal man be more just than God?
A41790Surely he professes to do this, at the time he wrote to them; and indeed, how else could he lead them on to perfection?
A41790The Antecedent can not be denied, without manifest danger to all the principles of Christs Doctrine; for if one be abolished, then why not the rest?
A41790The Fathers where are they, and the Prophets do they live for ever?
A41790The gift of tongues?
A41790The major is true, otherwise they ran before they were sent; and then how could they preach?
A41790What we?
A41790Whether they be true Churches of Christ or not?
A41790Whether they thenceforth stand equally engaged to Oversee those Churches, as the Church that first called them to serve as Pastors?
A41790Whether this be not a sufficient ground for them to doubt, whether that laying on of hands practised by us be instituted by God?
A41790Would he not teach the Christians concerning the knowledge of Christ in the more sublime points of Christianity?
A41790Would it not be absurd now to say, that Peter did communicate the blessing of tongues here?
A41790Ye did run well, who did hinder you that you should not obey the truth?
A41790and remitting the penitent?
A41790by ordaining them Elders, and dispencing to them the holy Ordinances?
A41790in setting things in order in remote Congregations?
A41790or how they principle them in it, or build them upon it?
A41790so am I, as well as with an are they Mnisters of Christ?
A41790to exercise Discipline by Excommunication of offenders?
A69672( Touch not, taste not, handle not: Which all are to perish with the Using) after the Commandments and Doctrines of Men: What can be more plain?
A696721 If it be said, That God confers inward Grace upon some, that are now baptized?
A6967221?
A6967228?
A69672And is not that alledged to be the End still?
A69672And may not the Professing Faith in Christ signifie that as well?
A69672And now, if the Gospel- Worship and Service stand in the same, where is the difference?
A69672And though they for the most part agree in this general, yet how do they Contend and Debate one against another?
A69672And what monstrous and wild Opinions and Conceivings have they invented, to inclose or affix the Body of Christ to their Bread and Wine?
A69672And yet would not our Adversaries judge this an Abuse, and not right peforming of this Sacrament?
A69672But do not Protestants by these Uncertainties open a Door to Papists for their excluding the People from the Cup?
A69672But if it be asked me, how it is?
A69672But is it not fit for those, that are Dead with Christ, to be subject to such Ordinances?
A69672But what necessary Relation hath all this to the Believers partaking of the Flesh and Blood of Christ?
A69672But why?
A69672For if we look into the plain Scripture, what can be thence inferred to urge the One, which may not be likewise pleaded for the Other?
A69672For the Question is, Whether, in what they did, they walked according to the Truth testified of by the Spirit in the Holy Scriptures?
A69672Have ye not Houses to eat and to drink in?
A69672How might the Gospel by this Liberty of Interpretation be Perverted?
A69672How strangely are they pinched, pained, and straitned to make this Spiritual Mystery agree to that Ceremony?
A69672How then?
A69672I admit the Answer; but how can it be evited to militate the same way against the other Practice?
A69672If it be asked then, What that Body, What that Flesh and Blood is?
A69672If it be asked, How and after what manner Man comes to partake of it, and to be fed by it?
A69672If they say, That the former was only a Sign of Humility and Purifying, What have they to prove that this was more?
A69672If they say, That the former, of Washing the Feet, was only a Ceremony; What have they, whence they can shew, that this breaking of bread is more?
A69672If they say, The one was only for a Time, and was no Evangelical Ordinance: What hath this to make it such, that the other wanted?
A69672If this serve not to take away the Absolute Necessity of the use of Bread and Wine, what can it serve to take away?
A69672Is not Bread and Wine, Meat and Drink?
A69672Let no Man therefore judge you in Meat or Drink?
A69672Now, was not God the Author of the Purifications and Baptisms under the Law?
A69672Opposers claim a Power to give their Sacraments from whence do they derive it?
A69672Or despise ye the Church of God, and shame them, that have not?
A69672Or for laying aside the One, which may not be likewise said against the Continuance of the Other?
A69672Or what reason have they to dispense with the One, more than the Papists have to do with the Other?
A69672So after he had Washed their Feet, he said, Know ye, what I have done to you?
A69672Some ask us, How we know, that Baptizing here is meant of Water, and not of the Spirit?
A69672Ten Canonicks burnt at Orleans, and why?
A69672The Baptism into the Name what it is?
A69672Then will not that open a Door for the Popish Argument against the Administration of the Cup to the People?
A69672Was not Water the Matter of them, which is so now?
A69672Was not the End of them to signifie an Inward Purifying by an Outward Washing?
A69672What Sealing Ordinance doth mean?
A69672What great Contest and Strife hath been betwixt the Greek and Latin Churches concerning the Bread?
A69672What have they more to shew for this, there being no express Repeal of them?
A69672What if it should be said, the Whole is but a Circumstance which fell out at that time when Christ did Eat the Passover?
A69672What makes the Christian Religion hateful to Jews, Turks and Heathens?
A69672Wherefore, if ye be dead with Christ from the Rudiments of the World, why, as though living in the World, are ye subject to Ordinances?
A69672Whether Peter''s Baptizing some with Water makes it a standing Ordinance to the Church?
A69672Whether Two Baptisms do make up the One?
A69672Whether this Ceremony be a necessary Part of the New Covenant, and Obligatory?
A69672Which is the Badge of Christianity?
A69672Why should he have said, that those whom he had already baptized, should yet be baptized by another Baptism?
A69672Why the Custom of Supping in Common was used among Christians?
A69672Yea, have not Scruples of this kind occasioned no little Contention among the Professors of Christianity?
A572711, 2. was it not that which the Apostles taught, that unto which Baptized believers as such were obedient?
A572711, 2. what will you say to make void this truth?
A572711. call it the Doctrine of Christ?
A572712. part of the foundation?
A5727130. or do you not think, that those who are short of any truth, if they profess any thing, but will as readily make this Objection as your selves?
A572716. and shall not believers now practise it?
A57271Alas, saith the Wiseman, what''s a little water?
A57271And is not this the sin of many Professors in this our day?
A57271But alas, what is Peter, Iohn and Paul, but Ministers by whom they believed?
A57271But let''s further consider, is not this a wile whereby Satan labours to make void this truth of Christ, as he hath done to others?
A57271But now some do Question, What grounds we have that practise laying on of hands, to separate from those who are Baptized?
A57271But now some may say, If we practise this Ordinance; where is the ground for our faith, seeing whatever is not of faith is sin?
A57271But now some may say, Was this practise to continue amongst believers?
A57271Can two walk together, except they are agreed?
A57271Consider wherein you are defective in these principles: are you not in Repentance?
A57271Doth not this discover; in some measure, the weakness of your Reasons or arguments before minded, for what in this Chapter you have affirmed?
A57271For I pray you, what is the beginning of the words of Christ, when it is minded as the foundation, but principles of his Doctrine?
A57271For did they receive the Holy Spirit, in a more then ordinary manner, through this Ordinance?
A57271For to what end doth God manifest his truth, by any poor Soul, by any of his people; but that others should be obedient?
A57271God forbid: shall not we hope to find acceptance with God in his appointment?
A57271How can you see the effect of that, you have never yet attained unto nor believed?
A57271I answer, that this is but cunning reasoning, to subvert the truth: for as to the Apostles waiting at Ierusalem, did not Christ command the so to do?
A57271I know it is not the practise of all of you; yet those that do it, were never to this day disowned by you?
A57271I say, In this, how confused have they appeared in their setting persons apart for Elders?
A57271I say, shall he alwayes prevail?
A57271If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?
A57271Is any sick amongst you?
A57271Is it because some of us, as you say, forbid you their houses?
A57271Is it, because as you say, we deny you Communion?
A57271Is not the Church of Christ the house of God?
A57271Let''s minde further, was this Ordinance performed without prayer?
A57271Not to go for further instance, Was not this the practise of the Bishops and Prelates, and after them the Presbyterians, then the Independants?
A57271Now I would Query of you, was this promise proper onely to some believers, or all believers?
A57271Now consider, was it for Babes then, and is it onely for strong men, now?
A57271Now hath not your boasting of gifts, something of this nature in it, to beget a disesteem in believers hearts of this truth?
A57271Now if any should say, How would this appear?
A57271Now were these believers at Samaria in the Expectation and practise of that the Apostles never taught them?
A57271Now what was that, but repentance from dead works, and faith towards God,& c. even all that our Saviour taught, even a form?
A57271O therefore let not truth be destroyed: his Doctrine was sealed with his blood, even the death of Christ, and shall we alter or deny his will?
A57271Shall not they tread in the footsteps of the flocks of Christ, be followers of those who first trusted in him?
A57271Some do say, Why did not Philip lay hands upon the Samaritans, as well as Baptize them?
A57271Surely you or I may suppose many things; but which of us is able to determine which is truth amongst all?
A57271Surely, It is not there said so, and therefore you do but suppose it to be so; for is there any Command expressed in those verses, for that practise?
A57271To which I answer, though this may be true, yet what is this to the purpose?
A57271Two which I answer, that though all commands are Oracles, and all Oracles are not commands; yet what is this unto the purpose?
A57271What effect have you seen, of the laying on of hands upon persons to office?
A57271What''s the Reason?
A57271Who is Paul, and who is Apollo; but Ministers by whom ye believed?
A57271and is not his Doctrine one with himself?
A57271and is not this his Doctrine or Teaching?
A57271are you according to your Profession of Christ in Baptism, dead to the rudiments of this World?
A57271bears witness unto this: What advantage then hath the Iew?
A57271but I pray you in your writing of this, did you carefully observe and remember the frames of your Spirit?
A57271but is he any otherwise a foundation then in his Doctrine as he is declared?
A57271it''s abomination unto them; and therefore how can we have Communion with them, or they with us?
A57271or what profit is there of circumcision?
A57271or would the Iews ignorance of the Lord of life, excuse their Crucifying the Lord of Glory?
A57271was not this alwayes; it''s too low, it''s too mean, it''s too plain?
A57271what a great evil would they make of this?
A57271what a noise and cry did they make after poor Souls, who for conscience towards God did separate from them?
A57271what''s the Reason, that you affirm one thing, Mr. Kiffin another, and Mr. Harrison a third?
A57271why consider, is it not upon the same ground that you your selves have denyed others?
A57271will you say, as many do, Christ is the foundation?
A57271yet will this excuse them?
A63577And I offer it to the Consideration of the Learned, whether the prime Signification of the Word be a sufficient Argument in this case?
A63577And if Philip had not been to put the Eunuch into the Water, and cover him with it, why should they go down both into the Water?
A63577And then he bawls very loud, saying, Mr. Williams, will you suffer him to Preach?
A63577And when Silence was obtained, he addressed himself to the Ministers after this manner: Sirs, What is the matter with you?
A63577Are ye afraid of the Commission?
A63577Are you of Mr. Chandler''s Opinion?
A63577Are you of Mr. Chandler''s mind in this Matter?
A63577But do you believe it?
A63577But how do you know that the Word was so Rendred by the Septuagint?
A63577But what do you bring this for now?
A63577But what doth all this signify?
A63577But what then doth he mean by denying my Major?
A63577But why must you prevent Mr. Chandler?
A63577But why should Mr. Robinson think it strange that any body should have such a Conceit in their Minds?
A63577But would not the People conclude that Infants were intended, if I tell them it must be done after the manner of Moses?
A63577Did we say Incompleat Disciples are not in the Commission?
A63577Do you bring this to prove that these Children were Baptized?
A63577Do you not know your own Argument?
A63577Doth he not know that the Church of Rome baptize things of an inferiour Nature?
A63577Dr. Russel Answers, Have I not put it into an Argument, and you will not suffer him to answer it?
A63577Gentlemen, are you not asham''d?
A63577Hath Christ two sorts of Subjects that he commands to be Baptized in that Commission?
A63577Here are divers Men of Parts and Learning among you, can none of you produce so much as one Instance to prove it?
A63577Here the Doctor was interrupted again, and they cried out, What do you tell us of Dr. Hammond?
A63577Here( saith he) a Question may be made, whether washing the Body in Baptism, must be by Dipping or Sprinkling?
A63577How can this possibly be true?
A63577How doth that appear?
A63577How shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard?
A63577I speak of Actual Disciples, made so by Teaching; are these such, who( by your own Confession) know not one Letter of the Book?
A63577I would know whether Infants are not as capable of Believing in Christ, as of coming to Christ?
A63577If Mr. Chandler can give no Instance, here are divers other Ministers, Gentlemen of Parts and Learning: Have none of them an Instance to produce?
A63577Is it Nonsense then to say, that any Infants belong to the Kingdom of Glory?
A63577Is it not the Subject contained in the Question; And will you( or dare you) deny that what I have said is in the Commission?
A63577Is not our Lord''s Commission of as good Authority as my Argument?
A63577Is not that the same which I say you said?
A63577Is this civil Treatment to a Stranger that comes so many Miles to meet you?
A63577Is this your Argument?
A63577Know ye not that so many of us as were dipt into Christ Jesus, we were dipt into his Death?
A63577May I not have leave to draw my Inference from the Text?
A63577Mr. Leigh said, How much Credit did we infer was granted by them to our Cause?
A63577Mr. Leigh was angry hereupon, saying, What do you talk of our being the keepers of them?
A63577Mr. Robinson, their Moderator, saith, Will you allow this of Consequence, or not?
A63577Mr. Williams ask''d him how many there was in the Covey?
A63577Must I be thus misrepresented to the People, because I say( that which you all know to be true) that Infants want the Use of Reason?
A63577Must I n ● ● be permitted to recite your own Authors, and some of the gre ● test Men that have written since the Reformation?
A63577Now was this before the Commission, or after it?
A63577Ofte en wetet ghy niet dat soo vele al''s wy in Christum Jesum dedoopt zyn, wy in Synen doodt gedoopt zyn?
A63577Or, rather, are some commanded, and others not commanded, and yet both to be Baptized; the one by a Command, and the other without?
A63577Sir, why do you hinder Mr. Chandler from speaking?
A63577Sir, you must bring in that Dipping is absolutely necessary( as in the Question) what do you talk of Sprinkling for?
A63577That the Ministers had granted out of their own mouths that we had gained the Cause?
A63577Then he puts this Question, Whether it ought to be performed by an Immersion, or an Aspersion,& c?
A63577This is not to the purpose, what have we to do with what Mr. Calvin says?
A63577Upon this Dr. Russel asked Mr. Leigh, what Relation this Argument of his had to the Commission?
A63577Was not the Mother of our Lord a Believer, when Christ was born?
A63577Wat verhindert my gedoopt te worden?
A63577What again Mr. Robinson?
A63577What do you mean by being recorded?
A63577What do you put that upon us for?
A63577What do you talk of Preaching?
A63577What do you talk of a Trick?
A63577What do you tell us of the Fathers?
A63577What have we to do with Dr. Hammond?
A63577What hinders me to be dipt?
A63577What is the Reason of all this?
A63577What is the Reason of this?
A63577What is this to my Argument?
A63577What need is there of so many Words about this?
A63577What then do you bring it for?
A63577What will all this People say, when they are gone?
A63577What, doth Colonel Self ride Lord General in the Town of Portsmouth to day?
A63577What, doth not Mr. Chandler know the difference between the Major and Minor?
A63577What, from the Commission?
A63577When you see you are like to be pinched upon an Argument, then you make it your business to hinder me from speaking: Doth this become a Moderator?
A63577Whereupon Mr. Sharp, the Moderator, call''d out aloud to still this great Noise, and spoke to this effect: What is the reason of this Hissing?
A63577Whereupon Mr. Williams askt him if he would do it to answer a Scrupulous Conscience without God''s Word?
A63577Whether according to the Commission of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, Adult Believers are only the proper Subjects of Baptism: and not Infants?
A63577Whether the Ordinance of Baptism as appointed by Christ, is to be Administred by Dipping, Plunging( or) Overwhelming only, and not otherways?
A63577Who ever did so?
A63577Why may they not be said to Believe, when they do not actually Believe; if imputatively they are said to come when their Parrents brought them?
A63577Why must Erasmus be thus slighted?
A63577Will you allow genuine Consequences drawn from Scripture?
A63577Will you allow good Scripture Consequences in this Case, or do you expect plain Scripture Words?
A63577Will you assert that?
A63577Will you fly from the Light of the Commission of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ?
A63577Will you grant that it is not Recorded in the New Testament?
A63577Yes, I do believe it: What then?
A63577You say no Person can give an Instance in Scripture whereby we baptize Infants: How do you prove this?
A63577and how shall they hear without a Preacher?
A63577and what do you talk of all the New Testament?
A63577do you understand Dutch?
A63577is all the New Testament the Apostle Paul''s writings?
A63577must I always be thus broke in upon by you; What is the meaning of it?
A63577not the Assembly of Divines?
A63577what is to do now?
A85422And how impertinent is it in arguing, to suppose that without proof, which a man knoweth is denyed by his adversary?
A85422And the Lord added unto the Church, who?
A85422But how impertinently to his Cause, and with how little proof, is this affirmed?
A85422But passing by this, how impertinently doth he argue that little which he undertakes, in the words mentioned?
A85422But what is there in this passage, to prove that one Baptism, or one kind of Baptism, is the foundation of a Church, more then another?
A85422By what principle in reason is this consequence formed?
A85422Do they affect to be either more wise or more Holy then God?
A85422Doth he judge this rule binding unto us now?
A85422For are they not these?
A85422For if we may take liberty to cast away one Law of Gospel Order, and Worship, then why not two, and so three, and in the end, all?
A85422For what though it never so sufficiently appears that men and women did beleeve before they were baptized?
A85422How much then is a man better then a sheep?
A85422How uncouth, sapless, and without savor, are such conceits and reasonments as these?
A85422If they practise in one case without Example, why do they not the like in the other?
A85422Is the Scripture express for any thing to precede the enjoyment of it self?
A85422Or can any pretence or plea whatsoever render the children of such high misdemeanors excusable before the Judgment Seat of Christ?
A85422Or do all men sin who Prophesy[ i. e. joyn with him that preahcheth the Word, in the act of hearing] with their heads covered?
A85422Or doth he think that that rule, by which those Christians acted in the case specified, is binding unto us now?
A85422Or is not his meaning in saying so many of us as,& c. clearly this, that as many of us Saints, or of us beleevers, who have been baptized?
A85422Such as were baptized?
A85422Tell us were they baptized, or no?
A85422This sence of the place considered, how frivolous and impertinent is this supercilious Interrogatory, which he builds upon it?
A85422What frivolous and empty reasonings are these?
A85422What is this to justifie thee in going in unto them?
A85422Whereas he demands; What is a not admiting, less, then a refusing to admit, them to such communion?
A85422Whereas he demands; Why doth the Querist make circumcision a Gospel rite, which is indeed a rite abolished by the Gospel?
A85422Will he say that women were circumcised?
A85422Ye did run well; who did hinder you, that ye should not obey the Truth?
A85422and consequently such Gospel Order layd totally aside?
A85422if two, why not ten, and so an hundred, or a thousand?
A85422or that all those, who were not circumcised in the Wilderness, were excluded from all acts of Church communion for Forty Years together?
A85422or that any kind of Baptism, more then imposition of hands?
A85422or that they were excluded form acts of Church- communion, because they were uncircumcised?
A85422or without a rule binding unto them?
A33349* Non pudet te relicuias vitae tibi reservare,& i d solum tempus bonae menti destinare, quod in nullam rem conferri possi ●?
A33349* Quae justior venia in omnibus causis, quam Voluntarius an quam Invitus peccator implorat?
A33349* Quid ergò pulchrius hâc consuetudine excutiendi totum diem?
A33349* Vis Deos propitiare?
A33349And now why tarriest thou?
A33349And shall not Uncircumcision, which is by nature, if it keep the Law, judge thee who by the Letter and Circumcision dost transgress the Law?
A33349Are the Glories of Heaven so inconsiderable?
A33349Are ye so foolish?
A33349Cui vitio obstitisti?
A33349Do we then make void the Law through Faith?
A33349Doth our Baptismal Vow lay no obligation upon us?
A33349For what agreement can there be, between a sensual, spightful, or malicious Soul, and the pure Society of the Spirits of just Men made perfect?
A33349Having begun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfect by the Flesh?
A33349He that ministreth to you the Spirit, and worketh Miracles among you, doth he it by the works of the Law, or by the hearing of Faith?
A33349He that washeth himself after the touching of a dead Body, if he touch it again, what availeth his washing?
A33349How much less will God accept us, when we are* least fit to serve him, and in those Days wherein we our selves have no Pleasure?
A33349In a word, can we see Men dally with Eternity, and for the sake of a few empty and momentany Gratifications, hazard their everlasting Welfare?
A33349In like manner, what can be more impossible, than for an earthly and wicked Soul, to be made happy by the Vision and Fruition of God?
A33349Is it a light thing to enter into such a Promise solemnly before God and his Church?
A33349Know ye not that so many of us, as were baptized into Jesus Christ, were baptized into his Death?
A33349Nonne ergo ille qui bonitatem sequi debet, si nequitiae praeferat partes, plus peccare videtur, quam is qui deliquit ignorans Dei virtutem?
A33349Offer the Blind for Sacrifice; offer the Lame and Sick; offer it now unto thy Governour; will he be pleased with thee?
A33349Or what doth his humbling profit him?
A33349Or, is the Duty we owe to God so small, that he should accept our coldest and most unwilling Service?
A33349Quam s ● r ● m est tunc videre incipere, cum desinendum est?
A33349Quâ parte melior es?
A33349Received ye the Spirit by the works of the Law, or by the hearing of Faith?
A33349So is it with a Man that fasteth for his Sins, and goeth again and doeth the same; who will hear his Prayer?
A33349What greater Uncharitableness can a Man possibly be guilty of towards the Soul of his Brother, or what greater Mockery of God?
A33349Will they not be much more inquisitive after the Glories of Earth, and the Gratifications of Sense?
A33349† Faciebat hoc Sextius, ut consummato die, cùm se ad nocturnam quietem recepisset, interrogaret animum suum, Quod hodie malum tuum sanasti?
A33349† Nunquid ergo protinus putas aboleri delicta eorum, qui agunt poenitentiam?
A85408& c. Yea, are not both women and children to be understood, where men only are named?
A854081, 2* even as Subjects are under the names of their Kings, and Families and Descents, under the names of their Heads?
A854081, 4?
A854083, or 4 ▪& c. would such an act as this be unlawful?
A85408And as for any competent ground otherwise to justifie the practice, hath such a thing ever seen the light of the Sun hitherto?
A85408And besides, is it not altogether irrational to imagine or think, that Faith should be required in order unto Baptism, simply for Faiths sake?
A85408Be no ways constrained, or solicited to communicate in this practice?
A85408If not, is it any ways necessary that we should believe, or ought it to be any Article of our Faith to believe, that they were baptized?
A85408If not, is not the practise of it traditional, and the product of humane discourse, as well, and as much, as the Baptizing of Infants?
A85408If so, how, or wherein doth the excess of the danger, or evil of the consequence appear?
A85408Or are such differences as these, of no authority, interest, or import, to umpire or decide the controversie depending between the two Baptisms?
A85408Or are there not many cases, wherein a man may break a Law,[ i. e. a standing Law, or a Law provided for ordinary cases] and yet be blameless?
A85408Or are there not several grounds, and these near at hand, very material and weighty, to strengthen this conjecture?
A85408Or doth not our Saviour in the Gospel justifie that action of theirs notwithstanding?
A85408Or hath the practice of admitting women to the Lords Table, any such, either precept, or example, to justifie it?
A85408Or is there any precept, which injoyns baptizing, or dipping, in the name of Christ, after a baptizing in infancy into this name?
A85408Or is there either vola or vestigium, little or much of such a practise as this to be found in the Scriptures, where they speak of Baptism?
A85408Or is there not as much difference between hot water, and cold, as is between a child, and a man?
A85408Or that God, or Christ, should enjoyn a requirement of them upon such a slender account as this?
A85408That the Apostle to the former writeth thus: Know ye not, that SO MANY OF US as were baptized into Jesus Christ, were baptized into his death?
A85408Whether did the Lord Christ, pointing to any river, or water, say, Vpon this water will I build my Church?
A85408or is there any such precept, as that mentioned, or example in Scripture, for the warrant of it?
A85408or profession of Faith, meerly for this Professions sake?
A85408that He was the Son of the living God, which Peter had confessed, say, Vpon this Rock will I build my Church a?
A85408that it became him to fulfil all RIGHTEOVSNES a?
A85408that there were no Beleevers unbaptized in the Apostles days,) the contrary being apparant( as may be touched hereafter?)
A85408why are they then baptized for the dead c?
A85408yea and some cases, wherein he may do it with commendation?
A01094( as the Prophet Isai teacheth,) and what all the glory of it, but the flower of the field?
A01094Ad quid, inquis, ingredior( saith he in the person of those conceited auditors) nisi aliquem Sermocinantem an ● iero?
A01094And I desire to know, either the place where, or the case when, or the cause why, such priuiledge is granted them?
A01094And againe, that in another place: Blessed art thou O Israel, who is like vnto thee, O people saued by the Lord?
A01094And he thereupon concludeth, Quod si illum fari non potes,& tacere non debe ●, quid restat tandem nisi vt iubiles?
A01094And where must this Iubilation be vsed?
A01094And why is he but Vaine?
A01094But what is that to vs?
A01094Can their worship of their crosse make our crosse an idol, which is not worshipped?
A01094Dicente domino, cur autem, non et a vobis ipsis quod iustum est iudicatis?
A01094Doth euery thing that breedeth a remembrance of any thing abused vnto idolatry, indanger vs to fall into the same idolatrie?
A01094Ergo, man may not adde a ceremoniall signe?
A01094Finally, what thing is all liuing flesh but only grasse?
A01094For first, why should the seeing of a crosse made, rather mooue vs to idolatry, then the hearing of an idoll named?
A01094For so it foloweth in that very place: What shall it profit thee to wine the whole worlde, if thou lose thine owne soule?
A01094For what is it els, to prefer our Sermons before the holy Scriptures, but to prefer mens speeches before the holy ghost?
A01094For what is it( I pray you) that in this name offendeth you?
A01094For what is that which can priuiledge vs from errour in our Preaching?
A01094For, secondly I demand, who those persons bee, vnto whom this pretended danger can bee intended?
A01094For, what if it gaue vs occasion to remember that ancient idolatry, which by remembring, wee abhorre: doth this make it vnlawfull?
A01094Haue they not made as great and as dangerous a schisme in this owne Church, about these matters, as euer the other did in the Church of the Iewes?
A01094He there confuteth that opinion, by his owne experience: Quanto ● agis vidi ex tuis literis, quam ex illius sermon ●, quid ageretur?
A01094How incohaerent is this?
A01094If then thou neither canst expresse him, nor oughtest to suppresse him, what other thing remaineth, but to iubilate vnto him?
A01094In all which, what was spoken, that could giue the least offence, vnto any well meaning, or but indifferent mind?
A01094Is it the name of a Badge, which so much offendeth you?
A01094Is not Papistry Preached?
A01094Is the signe the lesse lawfull, because it is a signe of our profession?
A01094Is therefore siluer made no siluer, if a man chance to say that gold is better?
A01094Nay, yet further, what, but auouched for a sealed truth, by al true Protestāts, against the Papists?
A01094Now to what end must all this reading be?
A01094Now what or whose preaching could haue wrought more worthy and noble effects then this bare reading did?
A01094Or can you thinke that it is no sinne, to go against a grounded law, when you thinke it so great a sinne, to go against an vngrounded opinion?
A01094Or must Preaching of necessity be disgraced, if Reading in any respect be preferred?
A01094Or, why should it be thought more powerfull to leade vs vnto the one, then this is, to lead vs vnto the other?
A01094Quid enim opusest cōcionatore?
A01094Quomodo( sa ● th he) priuabimus eccle ● ● am hac libertate, vt non possit suis ritibus aliquid signisicare?
A01094Shall therefore we Christians be aqua and igni interdicti?
A01094Shall we therefore say that S. Iames disableth Preaching,& maketh it vnnecessary to the attaining of wisedom?
A01094Should any thing whatsoeuer be thought vnlawfull, which instructeth our mindes, and sturreth vp our affections truly towards GOD?
A01094So likewise in another place vnto the Hebrewes: Haue yee forgotten the consolation which speaketh vnto you as vnto children?
A01094So likewise in another place vnto the Romanes: What saith the Scripture?
A01094So may I likewise reason in this our present question: Is therefore Preaching made no preaching, if in some points it be surpassed by Reading?
A01094Then to whom can belong this vnspeakeable reioycing, but onely vnto God, who is himselfe vnspeakeable?
A01094What can there be more plaine, or more full, or more direct vnto our purpose?
A01094What can there be more, either performed by the Preacher, or desired by the hearer, then here you see most plainely ascribed to the Scripture?
A01094What commandement of Christ, or what example of Apostles haue you for the surplice?
A01094What greater shew of danger could there bee in any thing, then to place the image of an Oxe, in the temple of GOD?
A01094What is there in this name, that can offend any wise man?
A01094What other thing are riches, but a heape of shining dust, which with euery blast of winde is puft away and perisheth?
A01094What other thing is beauty, but the weake paint of a false colour, which with one shake of an ague is blasted, and so fadeth?
A01094What profit hath a man of all his labours wherin he hath trauailed vnder the sun?
A01094What should I doe at Church( say they) if there be no man there to preach?
A01094Who knoweth not, that of all the causes, it is only The end, which maketh all actions to be either good or euill?
A01094Why so?
A01094Why?
A01094Why?
A01094and so what is there any where, which( in this so large and so laxe a sense) may not be called A monument of idolatry?
A01094are they Protestants?
A01094by what reason say you this?
A01094doe not all these find Pulpits, to vent themselues out of?
A01094is it the title of Honorable?
A01094is not Heresie Preached?
A01094is not Schisme, and contention, and all errour Preached?
A01094marke, et a vobis ipsis?
A01094or doth it not rather make it good, and profitable?
A01094or that he maketh either of them vnnecessarie for a Christian?
A01094or the abuse of it at one time, destroy the good vse of it for euer after?
A01094or the title of a Badge?
A01094or what speciall warrant and rule for your conscience, saue onely this generall rule of obedience?
A01094or, because the Papists haue worshipped their bread, may not Protestants vse bread?
A01094or, bee they Papists?
A01094where be they now( saith he) who say the word spoken hath greater power in it, then hath the word written?
A01094why?
A01094yea, and reading so often of one and the same thing?
A65465''T is done by the breaking of Bread and drinking of Wine, and is this so hard a thing that God requires of us?
A65465''T is the Remembrance of our Saviour''s Death; and does not that deserve to be remembred?
A65465''T is the lively Representation thereof to our Minds; and do we not need this, for are we not too apt to forget it?
A65465* Eoquem tam amentem esse putas, qui illud quo vescatur credat Deum esse?
A654651 DID I Read and Pray, Meditate and Examine my self last Night; and in what manner?
A65465Am I any wiser or better than I was the last?
A65465And how could we have any well grounded hopes of Pardon, but from the Revelation of the Gospel, and by the merits of a Redeemer?
A65465And is it not suspicious that there''s something very much amiss in our selves, when we are so ready to censure our Neighbours?
A65465And must not all this render the Mind exceeding quiet and happy?
A65465And the Apostle*, The Cup of Blessing; is it not the Communion of the Blood of Christ, the Bread of the Body of Christ?
A65465And the same of Meditation and Reading?
A65465And why should we not transplant any excellent Fruit into our own Soil, and get all the good we can from Persons of all Communions?
A65465Are they not guilty of Intemperance, or Injustice in their Dealings in the World?
A65465Ask any very pious person, who comes with Humility and Devotion to this Sacrament, whether they are not as sure of all this as that they breath?
A65465At least, why may not we have Congrogations to propagate Good Manners, as they have one to propagate their Ill Faith?
A65465But Lord is it I?
A65465But in answer to it, we must say of this Sacrament, as Ananias did to St. Paul of that of Baptism,* Why tarriest thou?
A65465But is it likely they had all of them Ponds, Pools, or Rivers, in, or near their Houses, sufficient to plunge all these?
A65465But it may be askt, is there no other unworthy receiving, and no other damnation as a consequent thereon, but what have been now describ''d?
A65465But may some here object, Where is this Blessedness you speak of?
A65465But what if besides all this we should find someting still more express for the Baptising of Children in the Acts of the Apostles?
A65465Can any man forbid Water that these should not be baptised?
A65465Can not the Blood of Jesus soften it, and cleanse it; that Blood of sprinkling which speaks better things than that of Abel?
A65465Did I think of God, last and first?
A65465Does it not look as if we were solicitous to take off Mens Eyes from our own Faults, tho''at the expence of another''s Reputation?
A65465For how can a Rebel be fit for Pardon, if he is not thankful when''t is offered him?
A65465For''t is a high Affront and Injury both to the King and the King''s Son; and will they not both extremely and justly resent it?
A65465Have I Pray''d?
A65465Have I remembred my Promises made at the last Sacrament, and how have I performed them?
A65465Have I thought of Death and Judgment?
A65465Have we not all broken our Covenant with God, and ought it not to be the most welcome Tidings to us in the World that we may again renew it?
A65465Have we nothing to thank him for, that we are so backward to render him this Sacrifice of Praise?
A65465How have I improved my Time this Day?
A65465Is Holy Friendship, is Christian Unity and Love so frightful a thing, that we will not so much as endure this Symbol of it?
A65465Is it a small thing to dwell in Christ, and Christ in us, to be one with Christ, and Christ with us?
A65465Is it any greater Crime to meet and sing Psalms together, than to sing profane Songs, or waste Hours in impertinent Chat or Drinking?
A65465Is it any more a Conventicle than any other Meetings?
A65465Is it not a good and pleasant thing for Brethren to dwell together in Unity?
A65465Is there any Law that it offends against?
A65465Is this worth desiring?
A65465Much more when he requires so easie a Testimony of our Gratitude and Obedience?
A65465O Saviour, why?
A65465Or are these only Fancies, and the fair, but fading Colours of Rhetorick and Imagination?
A65465Or if our Saviour had ask''d some great ● hing, should we not have done it?
A65465So thou didst think, who madest us out of nothing, who didst take this most endearing method to obtain our Love: And wilt thou accept it?
A65465The Answer was indeed to those adult Persons, who ask''d, What shall we do?
A65465They are of like Passions with other Men, and why may not they expect the same Allowances?
A65465To be united to him?
A65465To despise the World in comparison of him?
A65465To him what Offerings shall I make, Whence my Salvation came?
A65465To see him whom our Souls ought to love?
A65465To sit under his Shadow with unspeakable delight?
A65465To what Temptations am I like to be exposed?
A65465WHAT Mercies have I received this Day, Answers of Prayer, Deliverance from Evil, common or extraordinary Blessings?
A65465We are all called to be Saints, to Glory, as well as to Vertue, and why should we then be content with the lowest measures?
A65465We see it in Trades every day; and why should we not learn from those who are wise in their Generation?
A65465What Auxiliaries we want, and where to obtain them?
A65465What Duty omitted since Evening?
A65465What Duty omitted?
A65465What Memory, unless very extraordinary, to retain but their Names?
A65465What Mercies have I received?
A65465What Mercies we receive?
A65465What Mercy do I want for Soul or Body, my Self, or Relations, that I may now ask it?
A65465What Occasions may I probably have this Day of serving God, or my Neighbour?
A65465What Sin have I committed, in Thought, Word or Deed?
A65465What Sin have I committed?
A65465What Sins we are to confess, and to fight against?
A65465What Strength to visit them?
A65465What ail''d thee, O thou Sea To leave thy antient Bed?
A65465What do I want?
A65465What has a stubborn Rebel to do with his Prince''s Pardon?
A65465What have I done, endeavoured, or designed for God''s Glory, or the Good of my Neighbour; or have I lost any Opportunity for either?
A65465What our Debts are?
A65465What the best methods of Defence?
A65465What we still want, and which the best way to obtain them?
A65465Whence is it that my Saviour should be Guest to one that is such a Sinner?
A65465Where are these Promises in Holy Scripture, of such wonderful assistance in this Sacrament?
A65465Where it is not to be had indeed, the Case is different, but what are extraordinary Cases against a certain standing Rule?
A65465Where to expect an Assault?
A65465Where we are to plant our Batteries?
A65465Whether our Thoughts have been wandring, or fixed on the engaging Objects before us?
A65465Whether we feel this Divine Flame in our Hearts, and dearly love all those that bear the Image of the heavenly?
A65465Why did old Iordan flee And seek its distant Head?
A65465Why shou''d th''insulting Heathens Pride, Our Hopes alike and him deride?
A65465Ye Mountains why Leapt ye like Rams While Hills like Lambs Skipt lightly by?
A65465and How?
A65465may I offer it?
A65465wilt thou receive a Magdalen, after she has so long wandred from thee?
A665262dly, He confesseth that we have 30 Councils for Infants- Baptism; what then is become of his stout Assertion in his Treatise of Baptism?
A665263. of his Reply?
A665267, pertains not to the Carnal seed of Abraham, but to the Spiritual?
A66526And at this rate what Author can be secure from the Violence of his interpretations?
A66526And doth not Justin say it was lawful for all to receive the spiritual Circumcision, which is Baptism?
A66526And for quoting this Mr. Danvers is in a pet, and saith, I produce a spurious piece[ is the Magdeburgensian History such?]
A66526And how doth he clear himself of this?
A66526And how doth this prove Believers the only subjects of Baptism?
A66526And is it not a very great owning indeed, to say, he hath divers passages that seem to be against it?
A66526And is there any hurt in this?
A66526And truly if one were minded, how easy is it to retort upon him, and shew the vanity of his discourse in such a manner?
A66526And was it not a ridiculous reason which he gave why young men, and those who were newly married, and young widows should delay Baptism?
A66526And what do Osiander, Fuller and Bullinger say?
A66526And why may not the other expression be as well taken in a limited sense?
A66526And why may not this Council be supposed to be as inconsiderate?
A66526And why may we not suppose these Waldenses to be guilty of as much Impertinency and Nonsensicalness as the Assembly and Dr. Manton?
A66526Art thou afraid of the Seal( Mr. D''anvers will not have Baptism to be a Seal) because of the tenderness of his nature?
A66526Because there is not one wo ● d of Infants, nor of Infants- Baptism, nor its Apostolicalness: And what of that?
A66526But can Mr. Danvers find any- where in Rainerius where he positively saith, the Waldenses were against the practice of baptizing Infants?
A66526But do they say in all things?
A66526But hath he not forgotten what he speaks just before, That Cpyrian held Chrysin to be an Apostolical Tradition?
A66526But how doth M. D. prove this?
A66526But how doth Mr. Danvers make good what he affirms of Wickliff?
A66526But is not this more than Mr. Danvers can prove?
A66526But saith Mr. Danvers, Fabian hath fully hit Bede''s meaning: why?
A66526But suppose Bazil had said it, what will it amount to?
A66526But this Mr. D. likes not, and therefore, hath invented a way to reconcile the seeming difficulty( as he calls it) and what is that?
A66526But to come more closly to the matter, what express Command have we for the observation of the Christian Sabbath?
A66526But what are the weak grounds which Mr. Danvers mentions?
A66526But what can be said to that which is further urged from Bazil?
A66526But what doth this Council say against Infant- Baptism?
A66526But what makes Mr. Danvers judg otherwise as to these Britains?
A66526But what need more be said to this?
A66526But what saith Mr. Baxter in the forementioned place?
A66526But what sin have they commited?
A66526But what will he think of me now?
A66526But why should we question it?
A66526But will Mr. Danvers allow of no consequences, or are not implicit Commands obligatory?
A66526But, why should he fancy that this of Infants- Baptism, was one of those things fathered upon Cyprian?
A66526Did it not shadow forth the mortification of Sin, Regeneration, and Redemption by the blood of Christ?
A66526Do they indeed, saith he, believe the Lord''s Supper to belong in common with Baptism to all the Members of the Church?
A66526Dost thou ask me the question?
A66526Doth Mr. Danvers say, Circumcision was only a Seal to Abraham, not to Believers and their seed?
A66526Doth Mr. Danvers say, it could not be a seal to an Infant that had no faith?
A66526For now we shall want some Supreme Judg to determine, which are plain, which not; must we go to him and his party for resolution?
A66526For the Interrogation is, Must the Faithful be Sealed with Baptism?
A66526Hast thou a Child?
A66526He hath made a good beginning, hath he not?
A66526He saith, he quotes them not to prove Believers- Baptism was the only Baptism of those Centuries: Why then did he quote them?
A66526How came the Canon of the Church of Rome into Mr. Danvers''s mind, of Childrens being born of God by Regeneration?
A66526I let pass also Vice- comes, because he writes palpable lyes; how that Luther, Calvin, Beza, denyed Infants- Baptism; and why?
A66526It is not manifest that in case of death, he would have an Infant baptized?
A66526Marshal) the natural face of this Argument in a glass?
A66526Mr. D. translates it not[ so] publickly, because else it might be presently queried, how then could Guitmund tell?
A66526Mr. Wills, saith he, deals according to his wonted manner very disingenuously with me; but wherein I pray?
A66526Must the Faithful be sealed with Baptism?
A66526Nay, doth not Mr. Danvers himself tell us We admit of plain consequences?
A66526Now how doth Mr. Danvers clear himself of this?
A66526Now what shall I say to all this?
A66526Origen''s Writings( saith he) are corrupt: who denies it in some things?
A66526Tell me, I pray, and resolve the question, why are Infants baptized?
A66526That it is a meer Impertinency, and nothing to the purpose, why so?
A66526The Renovation of the Spirit, and Mortification of their Members?
A66526The sayings of those Men[ Pedobaptists] are expresly for his Opinion, though it may be[ O sad is it but a may be?]
A66526Then he comes to Infants, 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉,& c. Hast thou an Infant?
A66526Therefore, saith he, it must needs respect Infants- baptism; whether this be intended as an Argument, or a Conclusion, who can tell?
A66526To this Mr. Danvers answers p. 36. of his Reply, I do him manifest injury: How so?
A66526What if I say''t was at Carthage?
A66526What thinks Mr. Danvers of that passage of Nazianzen in his 5th Book of Theology?
A66526Where then is the manifest injury?
A66526Wherefore it should be carried through all: Art thou a young- Man?
A66526Who would not have judg''d Mr. D. by those lines a person able to command his Passion, yea a second Moses?
A66526Why, by inveighing against me Suo more, and telling the World, that I am an injurious Man, and charge on him a Falsehood of my own making; how so?
A66526Why?
A66526Will this think you do the business?
A66526Witnessing to what?
A66526You desire to know of me,( who should best know my own Opinion) whether or( how far) those things are true which they say, and cite in my name?
A66526and did they take up the practice with the Mass?
A66526and how irrational are the deductions of such an innumerable company of Doctors and learned Divines?
A66526and that against the express witness of so many worthy men, who lived a hundred years before them?
A66526and the Answer is, Faith must needs preceed and go before; and how absurd is it?
A66526and why may not this intend only the Adult as well as that above?
A66526can any man that is rational deny it?
A66526doth he not fly to rational Inference?
A66526doth he not know that omne universale continet in se particulare, every universal contains within it self the particular?
A66526doth not Dr. Owen positively assert it?
A66526hath he any other way for it than consequential Reasonings?
A66526head where the three last are his own?
A66526head, the four last lines being his own?
A66526how doth he know Baptizing is by Plunging?
A66526is any one loosed that is not bound?
A66526may we Baptize them?
A66526nor in the 4th head where the last is his own?
A66526p. 59) but do they say that none must be Baptized but such?
A66526purpose?
A66526shall I implore an Increpation from above, 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉?
A66526that he should not hold the same of Pedobaptism?
A66526was it to cast Dirt on his Witness?
A66526were then the subjects of Baptism?
A66526were they against Infant- Baptism before they declin''d?
A66526why all the sayings of the later Doctors and learned men( why not of the ancient ones too?)
A66526why then do not Infants partake of one as well as the other, since it belongs to them in Common, if Members of the Church?
A66526why then doth he call it an excellent History?
A66526will this prove that he owned no other Baptism but that of Believers in opposition to that of Infants?
A47124( Where doth the Scripture say, he is Outwardly and Bodily Glorified at God''s right Hand?
A4712414.6, 7. mention any thing of the Doctrin of Salvation, by the promised Messiah?
A4712428. say, Baptize into the Name; and is not that more than in the Name?
A47124Again, In p. 23. of that above mentioned Book, they answer a Question thus?
A47124Also by the word separating, and withdrawing, so as to have no Fellowship with them?
A47124And for a Proof he Querieth; Can a Man Retract and Renounce a Passage upon Supposition, and not know what the Passage is?
A47124And how Non- sensical is he to Argue; that as it is barely Historical, the Ungodly have that Belief?
A47124And what say''st thou to this?
A47124And whether Baptism be not a Doctrin, yea, or nay?
A47124And why so much strife and contention about G. Fox''s Papers of Church Orders, and Womens Dresses?
A47124Are not his Brethren come to higher Attainments than these outward things?
A47124As that one Text, that God is a Spirit is it not sufficient to prove the truth of it?
A47124But doth it therefore follow, that the Sin and Guilt is the same in both Cases?
A47124But how doth he prove that they used not this Form?
A47124But how is the end of that Sacrament, or Sign any wise Answered among the Quakers, who have Abolished both Signs?
A47124But how will he Reconcile this to W. Penn; who doth acknowledge that the Scriptures are a Means to know God, Christ and our selves?
A47124But is not that also a Doctrin?
A47124But many People speak after this manner; Have we not had the Gospel all this time till now?
A47124But what Proof gives he of this, that this was, or might be a Permission?
A47124But why may not their Ecclesiastick Discipline be reckoned as much belonging to the outer Court, as Water- Baptisme and the Supper?
A47124But, why may they not have a Power mediately from Christ, after some true manner, and yet in some sort immediate also?
A47124Did G. K.( saith he) in his diligent search overlook this?
A47124Do these words express the Glory he had with the Father before the World began, in which he is now Glorified?)
A47124Doth it therefore follow, that it was no Institution of Christ to the Apostles, and their Successors to Preach the Gospel?
A47124Doth not this strengthen the Papists in their false Faith; that Christ is daily offered in the Mass, an unbloody Sacrifice?
A47124Doth this prove that Christ without us is no Object of our Faith?
A47124First, he saith, the Apostle might well understand it of his inward coming and appearance; but what Proof doth he give of this?
A47124Have not many good Men done it?
A47124He meaneth only Spirit and Life; acknowledging, that it was at most an Oversight in me; but how doth this prove me a Changling in an Article of Faith?
A47124Here thou wouldst make two Christ''s, a Christ whose Person is above the Clouds, and a Christ within, but how provest thou two such Christs?
A47124Hoc est opus Dei, ut quid paras dentem& ventrem?
A47124How Ignorantly and Stupidly doth he here Argue?
A47124How can Man use the Candle, unless God light it in his Heart; and doth not God use it in order to bring, or Convert Man to himself?
A47124How can they who follow such blind Guides, but fall into the Ditch with them?
A47124How might the Gospel by this liberty of interpretation be perverted?
A47124How then can the same tongue bless God and curse men?
A47124I Answer, How Foolishly doth he here Argue, and Impertinently?
A47124If some of them had not been Baptized at all, it had been improper for him to ask them were they Baptized in the Name of Paul?
A47124If they do Evil that separate Man and Wife, whom God hath joyned, or put together; do not they worse who kill them both?
A47124Is he as Guilty of Damnation that Eats Swines Flesh Doubting 〈 ◊ 〉 that Eats and Drinks Unworthily at the Lord''s Table?
A47124Is not Christ God, and is not God a Spirit?
A47124Is not that rather the State that is reserved to the future Life?
A47124Is not this to make the Sacrifice of Christ of less Value and Efficacie in his own Body, than his Sacrifice in W. Penn''s Body?
A47124Is there any greater, or so great Blindness to be found in the Blindest, and most Ignorant of the Papists?
A47124Lo I am with you always, to the end of the World( saith he) what for?
A47124Must Meat, Drink and Cloathing be rejected, because that many abuse them?
A47124Must all that Retract from their Errors, be Reputed double Minded Men?
A47124Now how is that Cup the New Testament?
A47124Now, can this be wrought; or doth God Work this Work of Conversion in a lost Soul, without his Lighting a Candle in it?
A47124Otherwise, what can be meant by rejecting, casting out, and purging out, in the Scriptures of the New Testament?
A47124Reader, are not these dreadful Words, enough to make all Christian Ears to tingle?
A47124Reader: Wouldest thou not think by these Words, that W. Penn was in good earnest, Pleading for the Sacrament( as he calls it) or Sign of the Supper?
A47124Secondly, If here he only Argues on Supposition, and ad hominem; how shall we know when he Argueth Positively, and is in good earnest?
A47124Secondly, it is a Means of Grace; the Bread which we break is it not the Communion of the Lord''s Body?
A47124Seeing it is the Nature of all Sacrifices for Sin, that they be Slain, and their Blood Shed; how is Christ Slain in his Children, and when?
A47124Should the abuse of any thing commanded by God, take away the use of it?
A47124The Cup which we bless is it not the Communion of his Blood?
A47124The manner of Speech used here by Paul, is like that of James; doth the same fountain send forth sweet water and bitter?
A47124To be understood of Christ''s being Crucified in Men; else why doth he oppose me with his Queries?
A47124What Country- man is he?
A47124What was the State of the Church in the Apostles days, after they had received plentiful Illuminations of the Holy Ghost?
A47124Where doth the Scripture say, Christ offers himself up in his Children a Sacrifice for Sin?
A47124Why was it Prophecied of Christ; a Body hast thou prepared me, why not Bodies many, if he offer up himself in the Bodies of all the Saints?
A47124Will he meddle with School Terms, and yet understand them no more than a Fool?
A47124Yea, have not the Quakers commended some for Retracting and Condemning some things, which formerly they reckoned to be Divine Openings?
A47124and whether other Drink may not be used as well as Wine?
A47124is meant his Outward coming, as from any other places above cited, or any that can be brought, his Outward coming can be proved?
A47124to enable them to Baptize with Water?
A47124which are a shadow of things to come, but the body is of Christ?
A47124whoever said, that the bare Historical Relation, or Report of Christ Crucified, is the Power of God unto Salvation?
A47124you look for a Christ without you; from what Coast or Country shall he come?
A47124— How many Souls hast thou led into that Pit of Darkness and Blindness, as to believe that Christ is yet to come in Person?
A47585& c. But what injury doth it do us, who can say, Thus saith the Lord Jesus?
A47585''t is said the Spirit caught away Philip, that the Eunuch saw him no more: what a strange thing was this that followed Baptism?
A47585* Secondly, When the Apostles prayed, the House was shaken, but''t is not so now; doth Prayer therefore cease to be a duty?
A47585* Will any say, to drink Poison, or any deadly thing, or take up Serpents, is Milk for Babes?
A4758513. they laid their hands upon them; doth not them intend the very same they prayed for?
A4758513.1, 2?
A4758514.23?
A475856.1, 2?
A475856.1, 2?
A47585Again, because I have remission of Sins, and other Blessings promised in Baptism before baptized, shall I reject that Ordinance?
A47585And again that there is nothing but a faint insinuation from the Scripture to ground Laying on of hands upon?
A47585And are we not commanded to withdraw from every Brother that walks disorderly, and not after the Traditions we have received?
A47585And did not Peter and John teach it to the Saints at Samaria?
A47585And how do you come to know he did not?
A47585And how has God crowned this Service, as has been shewed, with wonderful manifestations thereof?
A47585And how have they defended it against the strongest opposition, as a glorious Institution of Jesus Christ?
A47585And is it so in very deed?
A47585And now as to some other Churches he speaks of, I grant we read not of their practising this Ordinance; yet what doth this make against it?
A47585And since these Principles are in the Apostle''s sense to be looked upon as Milk, and for Babes; what then is the Meat?
A47585Are all Prophets?
A47585Because( say they) if the Apostles were under it, they must have an Administrator; and who, say they, should that be?
A47585Besides, because God may step out of his usual way, must we do so too?
A47585But again, as Mr. Tomlinson minds, How could it be the weakness of these Hebrews, that they had need to be taught them again?
A47585But doth not this straiten and narrow the Interest of Jesus Christ?
A47585But let us examin this Scripture a little more: Have you received the Holy Spirit since ye believed?
A47585But may we not say with one of the Antients, By this rite of Imposition of Hands, God hath promised, and the Saints received the Holy Ghost?
A47585But now because this Miracle followed as the effect of that Administration then, shall we conclude it was the end of the Ordinance of Baptism?
A47585But pray where do you read that the 12 Disciples, or Apostles of Christ, were baptized?
A47585But secondly, The words are rather in themselves a Caution or Prohibition than otherwise; will he call this a full Precept?
A47585But, First,''T is not so now, shall we therefore assemble together no more?
A47585But, do they not confute themselves by thus arguing?
A47585Can it be thought that those were at that time Members of the Church, and yet so ignorant of the Holy Spirit?
A47585Did he command any thing in vain?
A47585Did he find it so clearly there?
A47585Do you think you should not need some Consequence or other, or help from some other Scripture, to prove''t is Water which is intended there?
A47585Does not this make as much every way against Laying on of hands upon Officers, as against that on baptized Believers as such?
A47585Doth it follow because we read not of their Baptism, they were not baptized?
A47585Doth not Mr. Wills in his Answer to your former Book of Baptism, charge you in much like words, as you do us here?
A47585For where do we read of their Repentance or Faith, of their being baptized, or their believing the Resurrection of the Dead, or Eternal Judgment?
A47585He has said here a great deal, and refuted us with as good Arguments as the Scots- man refuted Bellarmin: what is here more than meer Affirmations?
A47585How well have some of our Brethren written concerning Baptism?
A47585I desire to know how he would write were he to distinguish between one Hand and several, since Hands are in the Plural Number?
A47585I grant''t is easy to prove they did, yet when they demand such plain Texts for it, how do you answer them?
A47585If a bare Affirmation may be taken for a Proof in this, we are answered, and Mr. Danvers has done his business; what is here more?
A47585If the whole of Religion, or Doctrine of Godliness is comprehended in these six Principles, why should the Apostle call them first Principles?
A47585Imposition position of hands upon baptized Believers as such?
A47585In the days of the Apostles, the Holy Spirit produced miraculous Effects, but neither always, nor at all in all Men; Are all workers of Miracles?
A47585Let all Men here consider his partiality; Is this a Precept in so many words, Lay hands on all Officers?
A47585May it not be admired to see Men of such Light and Conscience be only pleased with the Theory and notional part of an Ordinance of Christ?
A47585May we not safely argue, that the Laying on of hands, which follows here in order of words, is what followed in order of practice?
A47585Mind that the Apostle is speaking only here of the first Principles of the Doctrine of Christ; are they not so called?
A47585Must not they, and them, mean all who are said to be baptized?
A47585Must we be their Enemies for telling them the truth?
A47585Nay, what Ordinance has not?
A47585Or shall we think the Apostle did not pray for the Women as well as the Men, the weaker Vessels, as well as the stronger?
A47585Ought not we to stand fast, and hold the Traditions we have been taught?
A47585Shall it not trouble our Spirits, when Persons labour to take away the Childrens Bread, or spill any of their sweet and heavenly Milk upon the ground?
A47585The Doctor''s Rule is ever to be followed, the Lord open his eyes; for how doth this clearly overthrow all his Arguments for Infant- Baptism?
A47585The Holy Spirit is promised to them that are baptized; but because some received the Spirit before baptized, needed they not be baptized?
A47585The Pedobaptists say, how can you prove by so many plain words, that Women received the Lord''s Supper?
A47585They continued in the Apostles Doctrine?
A47585This Observation for the honour of the Priesthood, did descend from the Scriptures; If you ask me where it is written?
A47585Vnto what then were ye baptized?
A47585Vnto what then were ye baptized?
A47585Was not the Hebrew Church the Church at Jerusalem?
A47585What Men can speak more fully to a Text?
A47585What can they instance in the Case, since what they mention of such and such Effects which followed, proves nothing in the least?
A47585What uncharitable thoughts do they retain of their Brethren?
A47585Where is Laying on of hands commanded by Christ?
A47585Where is that Laying on of hands taught, which he affirms to be a Principle of Christ''s Doctrine?
A47585Who told them so?
A47585Why should Mr. Danvers presume to say these Men confess the Scripture is but a probable ground, and that Tradition and Antiquity is the more certain?
A47585Why should he have a greater esteem for one than for another Institution?
A47585Why should they be offended at us for having an equal love to all the Commandments of Christ?
A47585Why should you make such a stir about an express Command?
A47585Would any judg this Good Divinity?
A47585Yet there is a further Promise made to thee, as thou art a Believer in Jesus Christ: and what can a poor Saint do without the Spirit?
A47585after Faith and Illumination, did baptize with?
A47585and Paul to the Disciples at Ephesus, and to Timothy?
A47585and is it not promised to all the Sons and Handmaids?
A47585and is not the End and Work of the Office( however called to it) one and the same?
A47585and is not this worthy of Commendation?
A47585and shall we think they did not pray for them all?
A47585and what guilt, on this Consideration, do they bring on their own Souls?
A47585and what outward Tribulations art thou( who professest the Gospel) exposed to?
A47585and who are the strong Men?
A47585are all workers of Miracles?
A47585but yet how have they opposed this other sacred Ordinance, or holy Oracle of God?
A47585do all speak with Tongues?
A47585do all speak with Tongues?
A47585had not all the like need of God''s Spirit?
A47585have all the Gift of Healing?
A47585i. e. they also are necessary only to be taught and known by all, and none concern''d in the personal practice of them?
A47585in so many plain words, Let all Believers eat the Lord''s Supper, or in Acts 2.41, 42?
A47585is it not by Inferences?
A47585may he not as well speak so concerning Repentance, Faith, and Baptism, as of this Principle?
A47585must all be baptized with the Baptism of the Spirit, and of Sufferings?
A47585must it be plainly laid down, or exprest in the Commission, or else no Divine Institution?
A47585or how could the Apostle say, he would leave them to go on to perfection?
A47585said in so many plain words, Let all Believers be baptized?
A47585tearing and dividing the Body of Christ, Will- worship, nay being under the dreadful Curse of Adding to the Word of God?
A47585that Ananias put his hands upon Saul, that he might receive his sight?
A47585the Antients who have written concerning Laying on of Hands?
A47585therefore need not I be baptized?
A47585thus speaking, Tell me, why there should be any such Confirmation, seeing no one Tittle thereof can be found in Scripture?
A47585to be baptiz''d therewith?
A47585what Temptations dost thou meet with, what Lusts and Corruptions still hast thou to mortify?
A47585why should he say then, it was for the extraordinary Gifts of the Spirit?
A47585yea, and made them obedient thereto?
A474481. of this Chapter; the Holy Apostle says thus, i. e. What shall we say then?
A4744812, 14, 39,& c. But do we reprobate our Children because we Baptise them not?
A4744812. to prove Baptism is Dipping or a figure of a burial?
A474483 saith he, know ye not that so many of us as were Baptised into Christ, were Baptized into his Death?
A474484. is not here more Covenants than one?
A4744841. proves no such, thing: What tho` the Babe leaped in the Womb of Elizabeth, doth that prove the Babe had faith or the habit of it?
A47448Again, he saith, how can any Man know they have faith, since he never saw any sign of it, neither was he told so by any that could tell?
A47448Again, he says, This deceitful Man hides the Sense and meaning of them from the World; Doth not this saviour of great malice?
A47448Alas, they want Power to do it for themselves, and how then should they do it for others?
A47448And brought them out and said, Sirs what must I do to be saved?
A47448And if this was so, how then was the way and ordinance of God in their Holy administration, one and the same in all the Churches of the Saints?
A47448And to these customs the Apostle alludes when he says, How shall we that are dead to Sin live any longer therein?
A47448And what would this Man make a new Bible, have a new rule, to tell us of things never heard of?
A47448And will any Man( says he) ye ●, will Paul ascribe all this to those that did not so much as profess the things signified?
A47448Answer, Are these Savoury expressions?
A47448Answer, Doth the Holy Ghost there refer to this change, or is Baptism a promise or a precept?
A47448Answer, Friend, may not you be found( as far as you know) to assert false things of Jesus Christ?
A47448Answer, I would know whether God is now in Covenant with Abrahams natural Seed as such; or are they not rejected?
A47448Answer, Is not the Jewish Church State dissolved, and doth not Dr. Owen tell you their Old Covenant is gone?
A47448Answer, Is this to shew your great wisdom?
A47448Answer, Must the Carnal Seed be Members of the Gospel- Church as under the Law, or is it else not a better Covenant that God has established?
A47448Answer, Sir, what reason do you give for this?
A47448Answer, Where did God expresly forbid Abraham to circumcise his Male Infants, on the 7th or 9th day, or not to circumcise Female Infants?
A47448Besides, we see they never mind nor regard their Covenant in the Case: and will not God one Day say, Who has required these things at your Hands?
A47448But Friend, how can you hold Communion with such persons who have a counterfeit Baptism?
A47448But Sir, are your Infants Church Members with you; doth the Church you belong unto consists of such as of the Adult?
A47448But are our Children a part of our selves and are we not believers without our Children?
A47448But sure, Sir, you mistake; your learning fails you: Will the food you eat feed your Wife?
A47448But which of all these shall we give credit to?
A47448Ca nt Men write upon controversible points without such bitterness, and reviling language?
A47448Can God be glorified by Man''s Disobedience, or by adding to his Word; by doing that which God hath not required?
A47448Can God be said to believe for us, or can there be faith in any subject, and yet no knowledg of the object, no nor one rational act exerted?
A47448Can a natural Church consisting of whole Parishes, Families, and Provinces, be all one with Gospel Congregational Churches of believers only?
A47448Can any of those that feed on the Flesh of Christ and drink his Blood, perish?
A47448Did ever any Man before now intimate that Baptism is the essential part of circumcision?
A47448Disprove it if you can?
A47448Do we say, the promise of the New Covenant God made to Abraham is dissolved?
A47448Doth Rantism or sprinkling bear any proportion to those great mysteries, here mentioned?
A47448Doth not that imply they went out of it?
A47448Doth she believe when you believe, because she is part of you, as here you intimate?
A47448Faith was reckoned to Abraham for Righteousness; how was it then reckoned, when he was in Circumcision, or in Uncircumcision?
A47448For''t is expresly said, Christ called that Child to him he was able to come, no doubt whom Christ called: Could an Infant do that?
A47448Friend, what Babes were they Peter Speaks of?
A47448Friend, what shall we think of you and your Papers?
A47448Hath he been as good as his word, or hath he not?
A47448How can Water, saith Mr. Charnock, an external thing, work upon the Soul physically?
A47448How can you presume to assert, that they did not go out of the House?
A47448How can you say Page 7. that they were all Baptized in his own House, when the Text speaks not any such thing?
A47448How dare Men adventure, this being so, to change Baptism from Dipping into Sprinkling, and the Subject, from an Adult Believer, to an ignorant Babe?
A47448How was it then reckoned?
A47448How will he escape, who says a Man should not Steal, if he Steals?
A47448I also ask you whether the Jewish Church that was founded upon that Old Covenant, is not gone and dissolved?
A47448I ask you whether there was no Covenant made with Abraham, that belonged to his Natural Seed as such only?
A47448I wish he knew his own Spirit and Weakness better, and not thus to admire what he hath done: Doth he think there is none can answer his Arguments?
A47448I would know since you speak only of those habits to be in Believers Infants, whether they were infused before they were born or after?
A47448If Infants as such were not included in the Covenant of Grace God made with Abraham, how can dying Infants be saved?
A47448If Infants believe they know the object of their Faith; can any believe in him, whom they know not?
A47448If any should say, why did you not cite these Assertions of Mr. B ● ● tn''s whilst he was living?
A47448If we act according to the authority of Christ in Baptism, is not our Baptism good?
A47448If we have it not here, saith Mr. Richard Baxter, where have it we?
A47448In Page 82. he saith, speaking of Mr. Collins, was there ever such Legerdemain played with the Sacred Scripture?
A47448In a Word; Can they make the Child or Children to repent and truly believe in Jesus Christ?
A47448Infants have is it their own, do they believe themselves or their Parents for them?
A47448Is here a word of the Cross, or suffering for Christ, or that we are Baptized to shew we must suffer Martyrdom with Christ?
A47448Is it not gone, are his Carnal Seed as such still in Covenant with God, or are they not with their external legal Covenant cast out?
A47448Is it not of your own making and devising?
A47448Is it safe to Scoff and make a sport when we write about Sacred things?
A47448Is it said he blessed them with spiritual blessings?
A47448Is it said they were baptized in the Jaylors House?
A47448Is not that distinction Mr. Collins speaks of, clearly laid down in these Scripture?
A47448Is nothing required say I, of Adult believers but passive Obedience?
A47448Is the Apostle speaking here of a Legal Federal Holiness?
A47448Is this to make the Holy God, a God of order, or of confusion?
A47448My Answer is, Must Infants of believers, as such, be comprehended in that Covenant, God made with Abraham, or else can they not be saved?
A47448No saving our Baptism and Churches from sinking to the bottom, which he hath so furiously attacked?
A47448Now can any of these things concern, or belong to Abraham ● Spiritual Seed, as such, that is, do they concern us Gentiles who do believe?
A47448Now can this be a Truth, since Christ who was more faithful than Moses, and delivered every thing plainly from the Father?
A47448Now will you say, if the Face or Head only of a Dead Corps was covered with Earth, and not the whole Body, that the Corps was buried?
A47448Or do we say, those Jews that believed or their Elect Infants were cast out of the Covenant of Grace?
A47448Or, that a Man should not commit Adultery, if he commits Adultery?
A47448Our Saviour shews the danger of rash Judgment; and what have ● e to do to judge our Fellow Servant, much less Churches?
A47448Page of your Book?
A47448Question, What is an Instituted Church of the Gospel?
A47448Sir, What think you now of two Covenants, and of a Covenant of peculiarity with Abraham''s Carnal Seed?
A47448Sir, why did you not answer these arguments?
A47448Such we grant are not true Ministers; but doth not he, think you, refer to such who were not trained up in School Learning?
A47448That we impose those Doctrins upon the People: Dare you falsly charge and condemn the innocent?
A47448Then I hope you will only have Elect Infants to be Baptised, and how do you know which they are, since they can make no confession of Faith?
A47448These in plain words are not forbid, are they therefore lawful?
A47448This being so, to what purpose do you make such a stir about the word Everlasting?
A47448To this Mr. Shute says, pray where do you find this distinction concerning the everlasting Covenant God made with Abraham, and his Seed?
A47448Was God the God of all Abrahams Carnal Seed as such; by way of special interest?
A47448Was it from the pain that circumcision put the Infants to, that the Apostle calls it a Yoke, that neither they nor their Fathers could bear?
A47448What Enemy could reproach us worse?
A47448What Text can be wronged worse?
A47448What can not God do?
A47448What could Goliah of Gath, or proud Rabshaketh say more?
A47448What difference is there between Baptisma( Greek) and Baptism?
A47448What is become now of your everlasting Covenant, God made with all the People of Israel or natural Seed of Abraham?
A47448What is required of Persons to be baptized?
A47448What of this?
A47448What reason hath he also to affirm, that none believed but the Jaylor himself?
A47448What, a Church under the Law and not a legal Church?
A47448When he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision?
A47448Where are you now with your humane invented, Lame, Decrepit Salvation,& c. Are not these Unchristian Reflections?
A47448Where did Christ forbid Infants of Believers, the Lords Supper?
A47448Where hath Christ forbid Baptizing of Turks, and Insidels, or the Children of unbelievers?
A47448Where is crossing in Baptism forbid, or Popists Salt Spittle, or Crisom or other Popish rites?
A47448Whether Children are in the Covenant of Grace, absolutely or conditionally?
A47448Whether in matters of meer positive right, such as Baptism is, we ought not to keep expresly and punctually to the revealed will of the Lawgiver?
A47448Whether our Baptism be a Truth of Christ, or a Counterfeit, will appear in our Answer; but why are we no Churches?
A47448Whether that can be an ordinance of Christ to which there is neither precept nor example?
A47448Why did this Man leave the Church of England?
A47448Why do we say that Irrational creatures are not fit Soil for the Seed of the word?
A47448Would you not have us give the true sense of the Word wherein we concur with all learned Men?
A47448Yet what is this to the Infants of Believers, as such?
A47448You confess he did not Baptize them; did he them give them habitual Faith for that blessing you plead for to be in Infants?
A47448You might have added many other Places of Scripture, where we read of Sprinkling: But what would it signify?
A47448and whether Circumcision did not belong to that Covenant, and so a Covenant of Peculiarity?
A47448are there any Acts precedent ▪ concomitant or consequent to this pretended habit?
A47448but since you know so well, pray what spiritual blessings were they?
A47448can a few drops on the Face represent that; or what representation is there in that of a Resurrection?
A47448did not God take away the first, that he might establish the second?
A47448doth not the Apostle exclude the Carnal Seed of Abraham as such; from being included in the Covenant of Grace?
A47448doth that figure o ● hold forth the burial of Christ, or that of the old Man?
A47448dying Infants in; differing in any point or part of it, from that wherein he saves Adult believers?
A47448have you any ground to run that parallel from any Text of Scripture?
A47448himself?
A47448how saith he, could this token of the Covenant be everlasting, if the Essence thereof was dissolved upon the coming in of the Gospel?
A47448how then could this be the unchangeable Covenant of Grace?
A47448how then were any dying Infants saved before Abraham''s days, or before the Covenant was made with him?
A47448i. e. in which Gentile believers, and their Seed were no ways concerned; was not Christ to come only of Abraham and his Seed, according to the flesh?
A47448if so what doth your arguing prove, nor is there a new Gospel national Church like the Church of the Jews instituted in the room of the old?
A47448if you should, would you not be laught at?
A47448is it not because they have no understanding?
A47448is that Branch of our Baptism a counterfeit also?
A47448is that in our power?
A47448is this the Spirit of Jesus Christ?
A47448know you not, that so many of us who were Baptized into Christ were Baptized into his Death, both in sign and signification?
A47448of Grace, yet how do you prove God doth regenerate Infants in the Womb or Cradle?
A47448or can Baptism bring into, or cast out of Gods election?
A47448or was it not rather because it lay them under an obligation to keep the whole Law?
A47448or will your Faith serve her?
A47448the Blessings of the Covenant of Grace made with the Root Abraham; but what is this to our Carnal Seed as such?
A47448the Old House and Old legal Right of Church- membership is overturned and r ● oted out for ever?
A47448tho''''t is thus in the Adult, must this Spirit of Faith or the Habit of Faith be therefore in Infants of Relievers also?
A47448what Covenant is that which the Apostle says, is took away and difanulled?
A47448where do you find any command for the Infant Seed of believers, to stay till they are Adult, to be Baptized?
A47448● ● y, ● ● w 〈 ◊ 〉 on know but that all Infants dying in Infancy may be elected?
A41824( If so) then why can not Men partake of the Lord''s Table, and the Table of Devils?
A41824( If so) then why can not Men that drink of this Cup, drink also of the Cup of Devils?
A4182428. to Dip and Sprinkle?
A41824And Pray how can any meet in his Name or Power, if they be not in it?
A41824And do you think that he used One Baptism to them, and commanded them to use Another to them that believe in him?
A41824And have I not more ground for it, than you have for Paul''s NOT ONLY?)
A41824And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye Baptized?
A41824And how must we do to know it?
A41824And how was he then?
A41824And if all Fulness dwell in Christ, as the Scripture saith, then what is there in Figures, Types, and Shadows?
A41824And now, you Water- Baptists, let me ask, Now where is Iohn''s Power?
A41824And pray what is the Table of the Lord?
A41824And pray, if they had, what would it do for them?
A41824And pray, wherein doth Christ exceed Moses, if he give them not Bread that far excels Moses''s Bread?
A41824And surely I may say, if he be with his People to the end, what is it that can be too hard for him, and them he makes use of?
A41824And though you may say, All are not sent to Baptize: Then I ask you, How must we do to know who are, and who are not?
A41824And was not the Israelites got out of the Faith, and out of the Power of God, when they looked back at the Host of Pharaoh?
A41824And what did they preach?
A41824And who Baptized them unto Moses?
A41824Answer, Nor doth he say, there is but one God, but one Lord, but one Faith, but one Hope,& c. What then?
A41824But altho''you should still say, Why then did the Apostles use it, after the Spirit''s Baptism was accomplish''d?
A41824But do these Men think ▪ a Man can not be dipped or plunged into any thing but Water?
A41824But further, you acknowledge your selves, that it is but a Type: Well, I ask you then, What doth it type forth unto us?
A41824But let me ask a little further: Pray what is this Cup of Blessing?
A41824But let me ask, Wherein stands the Communion and Unity of Christ''s Followers?
A41824But now Jesus Christ is glorified, and the Holy Ghost is given; then whither must we now go?
A41824But says the Priest, What outward Act did the Apostles use, when they Baptized with that Baptism, into the Name?
A41824But some may object and say, Is there nothing to be done in order to Baptize Men into the Name, but to Teach?
A41824But they might have said, Why John, why must thou decrease?
A41824But what were they of old plunged into, that were Baptized unto Moses in the Cloud and Sea?
A41824But why are the Professors of our Age so laborious for outward Bread?
A41824Can Children of God, Members of Christ, be miserable Sinners then, when they are in a Child''s State, and Members of Christ?
A41824Can any Sanctifie but Christ?
A41824Can it reach either Heart or Conscience?
A41824Can outward Water be excluded out of this Sentence?
A41824Christ said, They could not: And, Can any Man be both a Servant of Christ, and a Servant of Sin also?
A41824Did any but Christ, or can any other than Christ, give us this Living Water?
A41824Did not he abide in the Power of God, and in Faith?
A41824Do you think that he Baptized them with the Holy Ghost, and then sent them out to Baptize with Water?
A41824Doth Christ reign, rule, and sit as King over all?
A41824Doth it not blast the Fame of Christ Jesus, and his great Name, for Men to say they are Christians, and are not?
A41824Doth not Peter clearly shew, it was not outward washing the filth of the Flesh, but the cleansing of the Heart and Conscience?
A41824Doth not the Apostle say, as before, He that Sanctifieth, and they who are Sanctified, are all of one?
A41824For he hath all Fulness dwelling in him, and if we partake not of his Fulness, what is it we can partake of, that can do us any good?
A41824For if it did not reach Paul, who was Converted, and one not behind the Chiefest of the Apostles, how can it reach you?
A41824God forbid: For to us there is but One Lord: And he doth not say, There is but One Faith; must we therefore say, There are more Faiths than One?
A41824How comes it to pass, that you are greater sharers in this Commission than Paul?
A41824How oft have you been reproved by it?
A41824How then?
A41824How?
A41824How?
A41824I say, what Reason can be shown for the laying it wholly aside, and upholding their Dipping into, or Sprinkling with Water?
A41824I tell you?
A41824If it be a Type of the Baptism of Christ, then I ask you, What further need there is of it, when the thing signified by it is come?
A41824If it be not that Bread, are you sure that Christ''s Blessings goes along with it?
A41824Is he?
A41824Is it an outward Cup?
A41824Is it not Bread that perisheth?
A41824Is it not as weak and beggarly as other Elements are?
A41824Is it not his Power?
A41824Is it not in Christ?
A41824Is it not plainly said, Into Christ?
A41824Is it not sadly to be lamented, that People should be fed with Husk, when there is Bread enough in God''s House, and to spare?
A41824Is it outward?
A41824It will one day be said, Who hath required these things at your hands?
A41824It''s true; but is Christ only( without any thing else being joined unto him) all in all, unto all Mankind?
A41824Mark this, The Name of Iesus; what if he had said, the Power of Jesus?
A41824Mark, Had Iohn''s Baptism been in the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, then how should they but have heard of a Holy Ghost?
A41824May we say there is any more?
A41824Must we yet run to Moses, for the Bread that perisheth; or to Christ, for the Bread that endures to Everlasting Life?
A41824No, nor doth he not say, There is but One Lord; must we therefore say, There are more Lords than One?
A41824Nor wholly preach his Baptism useless, nor the Law neither, until such time as the Gospel had got some hold of the People?
A41824Now I conclude, that the Dead you mean, are such as are dead to Sin; and if so, how can ye that are dead to Sin, live any longer therein?
A41824Now if Paul was not sent to Baptize, as it''s clear he was not, how then can we think in Reason, that others were?
A41824Now it''s plainly said, that as Iohn fulfilled his Course, he said, Whom think ye that I am?
A41824Now what is the Devil''s Table?
A41824Oh where had you Commission for these things?
A41824Or can any Man conclude, that Paul here speaks of Water- Baptism?
A41824Or do you think that Type and Substance must remain together to the World''s End?
A41824Or is it Unleavened Bread, Passover- Bread?
A41824Or to Iohn either?
A41824Or to do any other Work?
A41824Or what is it a Type of?
A41824Paul laboured that their Faith might not stand in the Wisdom of Man, but in the Power of God, or Name of God; is it not all One, or Name of Jesus?
A41824Pray let me ask, What is the Bread that you break, is it Living Bread?
A41824Pray what is he, the Last, or the End of, if not of all Shadows, Types, Figures, and Changeable Things, as well as of Sin?
A41824Pray where was Moses then?
A41824Shew us your Commission: Where did you receive your Power and Authority in this matter, that you both Preach and Baptize?
A41824Surely these must needs be empty, if all dwell in Christ, and that he be all in all?
A41824The Apostles never called it, as you do, An Initiating Ordinance, and( say you) A Command of Christ: But who says so besides you?
A41824The Bread which we break, is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ?
A41824The Disciples came to Jesus, saying, Where wilt thou that we prepare for thee to eat the Passover?
A41824The People came to Iohn, and asked him, saying unto him, Why Baptizest thou, if thou be not that Christ, neither Elias, nor that Prophet?
A41824Was it not always from the Foundation of the Law, that when the Substance came, then the Shadows fled away?
A41824Was it not the Lord''s Work or Power that brought them to Moses, that stood in the Power of God, and in the Living Faith?
A41824Was not the Unleavened Bread( that Moses gave) Bread that perishes?
A41824Well, But He comes to thee to be Baptized of thee?
A41824Well, Iohn; And what will He do for us?
A41824Well, let me ask you, Are you thus Dead, Buried, and Risen with him by your Water- Baptism?
A41824What Advantage is this to your Souls?
A41824What Baptism?
A41824What Rule, what Title of a Word can be shewed for these things in all Holy Scripture?
A41824What Wisdom is there in doing thus, to give Money and Labour for that which is worth neither?
A41824What good Fruits follow our Sprinkling of Infants, and Dippers?
A41824When the fullness of time was come,( what then?)
A41824Where do you prove it?
A41824Wherefore do ye spend your Money for that which is not Bread, and your Labour for that which satisfieth not?
A41824Who Commanded you?
A41824Who sent you, that run into these things?
A41824Who would not live in her?
A41824Who, who would not dwell here?
A41824Will not he Baptize with Water?
A41824Would you have this Hole to creep out at?
A41824Yea, and Moses was a Prophet; how then is the least in the Kingdom greater than Iohn, and so consequently greater than Moses?
A41824Yes, but Iohn forbad Him, saying, I have need to be Baptized of Thee, and comest thou to me?
A41824and so it was called Blasphemy of Old, as you may see in this Scripture, to say, they were Iews, and were not; and what is it now?
A41824and so must have been in place to the end of the World, how could he pass it by, and only say, there is one Baptism?
A41824he saith, I have manifested thy Name unto the Men which thou gavest me: What is here meant by this Name?
A41824that the fulness of time was come; pray what fulness was this?
A41824that what he received of the Lord, was that which he also delivered unto them: What was that?
A41824what would you have?
A41824whoever sent you, Baptists, in this great and notable Day of the Lord?
A301381, 2. it must have place here or no where: why are those things called first Principles, if not first to be believed, and practised?
A301385. or to put them to shame before all that see your acts?
A30138Again, This is that which he seeketh for among the Corinthians; If the dead rise not at all, saith he, why then were you baptized for the dead?
A30138And all the rest they baptized, were they not left free to joyn themselves for their convenience, and Edification?
A30138And did ever God send an Ordinance to be a Pest and Plague to his People?
A30138And doth not the Lord as well require, the sign of Baptism now, as of Cirumcision then?
A30138And now I ask, What was the reason that God continued his Presence with this Church notwithstanding this transgression?
A30138And why is MY Rank so mean, that the most gracious and godly among you, may not duly and soberly consider of what I have said?
A30138And why may not I give it the Name of a Shew; when you call it a symbole, and compare it to a Gentleman''s Livery?
A30138And, are there no publick Christians, or publick Christian- Meetings, but them of your way?
A30138Are not my words verbatim these?
A30138Are not you commanded to keep out of the Church all that are not circumcised?
A30138As to the Query, What reason is there, why the Lord should suffer any of his Ordinances to be lost?
A30138B. C. of a Christian, and the beginning of Christianity, Milk for Babes, if it be no matter whether Baptism be practised or no?
A30138Because they are not baptized; have they not Jesus Christ?
A30138Besides, To what particular Church was the Epistle to the Hebrews wrote?
A30138Besides, the Proposition is universal, why then should you be the chief intended?
A30138But I say, why did John call them Vipers?
A30138But I would ask these men, If the Word of God came out from them?
A30138But are there not with you, even with you sins against the Lord your God?
A30138But are these words of Faith, or do the Scriptures only help you to seeming Imports, and me- hap- soes for your practice?
A30138But doth that install it in that place and dignity, that was never intended for it?
A30138But good Sir, are you now for unwritten verities?
A30138But good Sir, why so short- winded?
A30138But how came Diotrephes so lately into our parts?
A30138But how will you prove that there was a Church, a rightly constituted Church at Rome, besides that in Aquila''s house?
A30138But must not they use, and enjoy what they know, because they know not all?
A30138But say you, We have now found an Advocate for Sin against GOD, in the breach of one of HIS holy Commands?
A30138But say you, Wherein lies the force of this man''s Argument against Baptism as to its place, worth, and continuance?
A30138But say you, Who taught you to divide betwixt Christ and his Precepts, that you word it at such a rate?
A30138But suppose they were all Baptized, because they had light therein, what then?
A30138But what acts of disobedience do we indulge them in?
A30138But what if a man want Light in his Duty to the Poor?
A30138But what if a man want Light in the Supper?
A30138But what is there in my Proposition, that men, considerate, can be offended at?
A30138But what need I grant you that which can not be proved?
A30138But what was the Spirit of Diotrephes?
A30138But what, if when he hath used it, he still continueth dark about it; what will you advise him now?
A30138But what?
A30138But what?
A30138But where are they here forbidden to teach them other Truths, before they be baptized?
A30138But why can you indulge the Baptists in many acts of disobedience?
A30138But why did you not Answer these parts of my Argument?
A30138But why did you not shew me my evil in thus calling it, when opposed to the Substance, and the thing signified?
A30138But why do YOU throw out FAITH?
A30138But why not consult with others, is Wisdom to die with you?
A30138But why so much offended at this?
A30138But why would they take from us the Holy Scriptures?
A30138But will any object; they can not believe that God receiveth the unbaptized Saints?
A30138But you ask me, If outward and bodily Conformity be become a crime?
A30138But you ask, Is my peace maintained in a way of disobedience?
A30138But you bid me tell you, What I mean by Spirit- Baptism?
A30138But you descant; Is Baptism none of the Laws of Christ?
A30138But you object, Must our Love to the unbaptized indulge them in an act of disobedience?
A30138But, I say, wherein is the Proposition offensive?
A30138But, Sir, Are none but those of your way the publick Christians?
A30138But, Sir, who have I pleaded for, in the denyal of any one Ordinance of God?
A30138By which Professors seem widingly led, though against so many plain Commands and Examples, written as with a Sun- beam, that he that runs may read?
A30138Can not we love their Persons, Parts, Graces, but we must love their Sins?
A30138Can you build and leave out a stone in the Foundation?
A30138Consent and nothing else?
A30138Do you allow their Sprinkling?
A30138Do you allow their signing with the Cross?
A30138Do you more to the open Prophane, yea, to all Wizards and Witches in the Land?
A30138Doth this prove that Baptism is essential to Church- Communion?
A30138First, By whom?
A30138For he asketh me very devoutly, Whether any unbaptized Persons were concerned in these Epistles?
A30138For if he did not heed who himself had baptized, much less did he heed who were baptized by others?
A30138Further, I make a question upon three Scriptures, Whether all the Saints, even in the Primitive times, were baptized with Water?
A30138Further, Suppose I should grant this groundless Notion, Were not the Jews in Old Testament times to enter the Church by Circumcision?
A30138Hath not God chosen the foolish, the weak, the base, yea and even things that are not, to bring to nought things that are?
A30138Hath not man''s wisdom interposed to darken this part of God''s Counsel?
A30138Have I such an Argument in all my little Book?
A30138How comes contesting for Water- baptism to be so much against you?
A30138I say again, Should any so conclude hence, would not all Experience prove him void of Truth?
A30138If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil; but if well, why smitest thou me?
A30138If it be good, and godly, why may it not be accepted?
A30138If it be said Water- baptism is not there intended, let them shew me how many Baptisms there are besides Water- baptism?
A30138If it be, why is it not imbraced?
A30138If you bid him wait, do you not encourage him to live in sin, as much as I do?
A30138Is Christ divided?
A30138Is it an Inward one?
A30138Is it not a wicked thing to make bars to Communion, where God hath made none?
A30138Is it the Substance, is it the thing signified?
A30138Is not that the very entring- Ordinance?
A30138Is not this the Carpenter?
A30138Is there more Precepts or Precedents for the Supper, than Baptism?
A30138Is there no Precept for this Practice, that it must be thus despised?
A30138Is this the way of your retaliation?
A30138It is a Command?
A30138May he not shew to, or conceal from this, or another of his Servants, which of his Truths he pleaseth?
A30138May you indeed receive Persons into the Church unprepared for the Lord''s- Supper; yea, unprepared for that, with other solemn Appointments?
A30138Must God be called to an account by you, why he giveth more Light about the Supper, than Baptism?
A30138Must we go to Hell, and be damned for want of Faith in Water- baptism?
A30138My last Argument, you say is this; The World may wonder at your carriage to those Unbaptized Persons, in keeping them out of Communion?
A30138NOTHING else but Consent?
A30138Need I reade you a Lecture?
A30138Neither is Baptism any thing?
A30138Now I will add, But what if he that can give a shilling, giveth nothing?
A30138Or are you afraid lest the Truth should invade your quarters?
A30138Or do you count all that your selves have no hand in, done to your disparagement?
A30138Or must they neglect the weightier matters, because they want Mint, and Annise, and Commin?
A30138Or, are these such as may better be broken, than for want of light to forbear Baptism with Water?
A30138Or, are you become so high in your own phantasies, that none have, or are to have but private means of Grace?
A30138Or, must their Graces be increased by none but private means?
A30138Or, must we now be afraid to say Christ is better than Water- baptism?
A30138Or, ought none but them that are baptized to have the publick means of Grace?
A30138Or, whether Christ hath not given his whole Word to every one that believeth, whether they be baptized, or in, or out of Church- Fellowship?
A30138Or, whether every Saint in some sort, hath not the keyes of the Kingdom of Heaven, which are the Scriptures and their Power?
A30138Secondly, By whom, and to what, he that is weak in the Faith, is to be received?
A30138Secondly, To what?
A30138Should not the multitude of words be answered?
A30138Should thy lyes make men hold their peace?
A30138Suppose all, if all these Churches were baptized, what then?
A30138That this must be so urged for their excuse: Hath God been more sparing in making out his mind in the one, rather than the other?
A30138That very few will inquire after it, or submit to it?
A30138The Bread which we break, is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ?
A30138The Cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the Communion of the Blood of Christ?
A30138The United are all the Faithful, in one Body; into whom?
A30138The second part of the Enquiry is, to what he that is weak in the Faith is to be received?
A30138To instance no more, although I could instance many, are not they the words of our Lord?
A30138Was it not because they had that richer and better thing, the Lord Jesus Christ?
A30138Was it not the art of the false Apostles of old to say thus?
A30138Was that a New- Testament- Church, or no?
A30138Was you awake now?
A30138What Doctrine did it preach to you?
A30138What a kind of a YOU am I?
A30138What a many private things have we now brought out to publick view?
A30138What if I did?
A30138What is Christ''s Doctrine, Paul''s Doctrine, Scripture- Doctrine, but the Truth couched under the words that are spoken?
A30138What is here in chief asserted, but the Doctrine only which Water- baptism preacheth?
A30138What is it?
A30138What say you to John of Leyden?
A30138What say you to breaking of Bread, which the Devil, by abusing, made an Engine in the hand of Papists to burn, starve, hang- and- draw thousands?
A30138What say you to the Church all a- long the Revelation quite through the Reign of Antichrist?
A30138What say you to the Church in the Wilderness?
A30138What say you to, This is my Body?
A30138What was said of Eating, or the contrary, may as to this be said of Water- baptism; Neither if I be baptized, am I the better?
A30138What work did he make by the abuse of the Ordinance of Water- Baptism?
A30138What would you have done, had I in the least, either in matter or manner, though but seemingly miscarried among you?
A30138What?
A30138What?
A30138What?
A30138What?
A30138Whether it be that of Water, or no?
A30138Who said it?
A30138Why did John reject the Pharisees that would have been baptized?
A30138Why did you only cavil at words?
A30138Why then do you despise my rank, my state, and quality in the World?
A30138Why then were you baptized?
A30138Why, Sir, did you not Answer these things?
A30138Yea, and for all those that you thus received, are you not commanded to cast them out again, to cut them off from among this people?
A30138Yea, or for their neglect of it either?
A30138You add, Is it a Persons Light that giveth being to a Precept?
A30138You ask again, Suppose men plead want of Light in other Commands?
A30138You might have stopped at[ and nothing else] you need not in particular have rejected Faith: your first Error was bad enough, what?
A30138Your thirteenth Argument is, If Obedience must discover the truth of a man''s Faith to others, why must Baptism be shut out?
A30138Your twelfth Argument is, Why should Professors have more Light in breaking of Bread, than Baptism?
A30138and Paul examine them that were?
A30138and how would such an interpretation, foolishly charge the Lord, as if he took care ONLY of those within, but not LIKE care of those without?
A30138and is there not like reason for it?
A30138and say, Did I ever find Baptism a Pest or Plague to Churches?
A30138and should a man full of talk be justified?
A30138and then to Father these their doings upon God, when yet he hath not commanded it, neither in the New Testament nor the Old?
A30138and when thou mockest, shall no man make thee an answer?
A30138are not the poor Saints now in this City?
A30138are not they concerned in these instructions?
A30138are not they part of the Scriptures of Truth?
A30138are they all ESAU''S indeed?
A30138both those of Peter, and the first of John?
A30138but may it not be as strongly supposed, that the Presence and Blessing of the Lord Jesus, with his Ministers, is laid upon the same ground also?
A30138for legal grounds, though not expressed?
A30138in the fifth verse, in one Lord Jesus Christ; by what?
A30138neither if I be not, am I the worse?
A30138not so much as a respect to the matter or end?
A30138or if it came to them only?
A30138or is not the Church by these words at all directed how to carry it to those that were not yet in fellowship?
A30138or the Epistle of James?
A30138what did Baptism teach you?
A30138whether only unto mutual affection, as some affirm, as if he were in Church- Fellowship before, that were weak in the Faith?
A30138why could not you make the same work with the other Scriptures, as you did with these?
A30138would you have men to receive it with such Consciences?
A32091ARE not the Eyes of him to whom your Vows are made always upon you?
A32091And can it be suppos''d, Parents should have great Power over their Children, in Natural Matters, and Civil Affairs, and none in Religious Concerns?
A32091And can you pretend that you have rightly us''d the Grace that hath been afforded you?
A32091And did you not heartily wish that you had carefully shunned it, and watched against it?
A32091And do you think he can observe you running a Round of careless making, and wilful breaking of seemingly Solemn Vows and Promises, and not resent it?
A32091And doth not their Expresness as well as their Frequency add to their force?
A32091And hath he not given me his Promise in his Word, and seal''d it at his Table?
A32091And hide his face from you to convince you of the disingenuity of your dealings with him; and show you how he''s displeased therewith?
A32091And how Terribly and Violently they may be Assaulted as strong as they apprehend their mountain to stand?
A32091And how certainly will they be so, without a speedy and sorrowful Repentance?
A32091And how justly may they be follow''d with an Eternal Vengeance?
A32091And is this a suitable Return for such Love as his was?
A32091And may''st thou not reasonably expect to smart for it?
A32091And might you not have had more, had that but been duly improved?
A32091And should not this thought shame you?
A32091And then, 8. and Lastly; WHEN do you expect to arrive at a confirmed State?
A32091And what can awe us, if not the sight of the Blood of our Dearest Saviour, which was shed to Expiate Sin?
A32091And what can be too severe for you?
A32091And what can fire my frozen Heart?
A32091And what it is that is necessary as a pre- requisite Qualification?
A32091And what shall I do to retain my Warreth?
A32091And what, will you never begin?
A32091And whether they do n''t engage to walk agreeably to all the Laws of the Gospel?
A32091And why art thou disquieted within me?
A32091And why may not we be several ways bound and obliged to the same thing?
A32091And why so false to thy God and Saviour?
A32091And will you be more unjust to God, than you would to Man?
A32091And will you not then endeavour to take up?
A32091And would you not if they had been in your power rather have chosen to have parted with them, than to have gone without it?
A32091Are they things of greater weight and moment, and that more nearly concern you?
A32091Are they things your concern about which will turn to better account than your care in this matter?
A32091But might you not do much more towards the avoiding of Sin; might you not avoid much more Sin than you ordinarily do?
A32091But what comfort can you ever expect in any thing, the pursuit of which hindred your carefulness to keep your Sacramental Vows?
A32091But what signifies all this, if thou Vowest, and Breakest; Engagest and Falsifiest thy Word, as soon as thou hast done?
A32091CAN you imagine your frequent repeating your Vows, at all diminishes your sin or lessens your guilt?
A32091Can I or any one, so easily forget this, as if it were but once or twice in an whole Lives space that solemn Vows were made?
A32091Can all he hath done and suffer''d for you, no more influence you, than this comes to?
A32091Can any thing be more ungrateful?
A32091Can the Searcher of Hearts be ignorant with how little seriousness you make your Sacramental Vows, and how little you mind them afterwards?
A32091Can you be satisfied with the lowest degree of Grace that''s saving, and that''s capable of helping you to Heaven?
A32091Can you ever think to hide from him, who is privy to all your Ways, the Deceitfulness of your Dealing with him?
A32091Children are bound to stand to any Engagements their Parents come under for them, unless in any thing Sinful and of dangerous consequence?
A32091Could you have any Patience with them?
A32091Could you have any regard to them?
A32091Could you mind any thing that came from them?
A32091Could''st thou do this without deliberation?
A32091DO you never think of a Day of Reckoning that''s coming?
A32091DOTH not God, think you, take notice of your wretched trifling with him?
A32091Did not Sin then sit heavy upon your Minds, and depress your Spirits?
A32091Did you not then think an Interest in God and Christ to be worth more than a thousand Worlds?
A32091Doth Conscience never read you your Doom, summoning you, as''t were, before hand, to the Bar of God?
A32091Doth it not then deserve many serious thoughts how this sum shall be discharg''d?
A32091Doth not he search and try you, eye and view you?
A32091Doth not he see your Warmth and Seriousness at a Sacrament?
A32091Doth not your Relation to God, and interest in him, make your Breaches the more Provoking?
A32091Doth not your aggravated Guilt cry aloud for Vengeance?
A32091For what signifies an Infant Dedication by Parents to the Most High God, tho''ever so Serious?
A32091For why else shouldst thou desire to be admitted to the Communion, there to renew thy Engagement, and repeat thy Vow?
A32091HOW far and in what cases such Vows may be dispens''d with?
A32091Hath not every part of my Duty Benefit attending it?
A32091Have you not found& tasted it to be a bitter thing to play fast and loose with God; to falsify your Engagements, and break his Bonds?
A32091Have you not smarted for past Faults, and will you run into the same again?
A32091Have you not sometimes in your Retirements some pre- apprehensions of a sad Account that you have to give to God another Day?
A32091He once found himself very despondent: But how doth he chide himself?
A32091He will never change or draw back: Why then should I?
A32091How can I do this wickedness and sin against God?
A32091How comes it then that you let so many out strip you?
A32091How even, uniform, steddy, vigorous, holy, and heavenly shall some be over others?
A32091How free and undisturb''d might your Communion with him have been?
A32091How knows any one he shall have Strength to keep such a Vow, when he hath made it?
A32091How much Good might you have done in the World?
A32091How much Honour might you have brought to God?
A32091How then can their Doctrine hold?
A32091How ungovernable dost thou show thy self, that such Sacred Transactions as are manag''d at every Sacrament, do no more affect and awe thee?
A32091I Appeal to all( that will take the pains to read and review it) Whether this Vow thus drawn up, contains any thing unreasonable?
A32091If Covenant Breakers amongst Men are to be severely punisht; how much more those that break their Vows to the Blessed God?
A32091If it be not the best Course you can take, why do you vow you''l lead it?
A32091If it be, why then are you so much worse than your Word?
A32091If the sense of often repeated engagements is apt to wear off( and who sees not that it too too often does so even in the best?)
A32091Is it not a bruised, nay, a broken Christ, giving his Soul an Offering for Sin, and shedding his Blood to make Atonement?
A32091Is not God more dishonour''d by your failures and neglects, than any others whatsoever?
A32091Is not Gods Honour much in your hands?
A32091Is not He with whom I have been Transacting able to assist me?
A32091Is not all this chargeable upon your frequent and sad Breaches of your Sacramental Vows?
A32091Is not every thing that I have vow''d antecedently my Duty?
A32091Is this all the Return you''ll make him for his unspeakable Kindness to you?
A32091Is this like a Christian?
A32091Is this the way to grow and thrive in Grace and Piety?
A32091Is this the way to secure the Divine favour?
A32091Is this the way to show the Resentments I have of my Redeemers amazing Love?
A32091It may be you''ll plead the force of Temptation; but how can that excuse you, who do n''t watch, and pray, and strive against it?
A32091Let such Persons be tempted to Sin, and they have this soon occurs to them, How can I run into this and break my Vows to my God and Saviour?
A32091MAY not your frequent Breaches of your Sacramental Engagements, much blur the evidences of your sincerity?
A32091MIGHT not any, even the best of you, take much more care to live up to your Sacramental Vows than you do?
A32091May he not justly cause you to walk mournfully and heavily, who often walk so carelesly and remisly?
A32091May he not justly resent it in a very high manner, to have have his Kindness thus slighted?
A32091May he not justly resent it?
A32091May he not justly suffer the Devil to take the advantage against you which you give him by your Breaches of your Sacramental Vows?
A32091May not God justly expect otherguess Treatment at our hands?
A32091May not that which betrays the great Prevalence of Corruption in you, often make your Integrity dubious?
A32091May you not justly expect, that a Train of Temporal Judgments should follow you?
A32091Must he be always suffering from you, who once suffered for you?
A32091Must you not blame your selves, and justify him?
A32091My Saviour hath made himself and all his Benefits over to me, in an Everlasting Covenant; what could I then do less then return my self back to him?
A32091Now what Man is so happy as he that hath Peace with the Blessed God?
A32091O wretched Man that I am, who shall deliver me from this body of death?
A32091Oh who hath so dead, and cold, and dull, and listless, and slipery an heart as I, will he often say?
A32091On what account, I pray, was it, that the Apostle tells the Corinthians, That many were sick and weak among them, and many slept?
A32091Or if he is at present, that he shall always continue so?
A32091Or is it not rather the way to decline and go backward?
A32091Or is it not rather the way to incur Gods Displeasure?
A32091Or rather doth it not wofully add to, and enhance it?
A32091Shall I forget whose I am, and who I am to serve, and what are my Engagements, and to whom and how I am bound?
A32091Shall I go and undo what I have been doing, by a lazy Indifferency, a negligent and careless course of Life?
A32091Shall I not by this means dishonour God, lose my own Peace, and deaden others?
A32091So what a safeguard are frequently repeated Vows, seriously made, and strongly imprest, against most Temptations?
A32091Suppose a Man superstitiously abuses the Scripture,( which I am satisfied is no impossible thing) am I therefore obliged to lay it aside as useless?
A32091That Repeated Engagements to be the Lords, make your wilful breaches of them the less dangerous?
A32091That they are capable of being bound in Civils: Why not in Spirituals?
A32091The Living up to your Christian Vows?
A32091The foregoing Chapter will from most be apt to draw forth this further Enquiry; How may we come to live correspondently to our many solemn Tyes?
A32091Therefore may a Person say, Do I forbear coming to the Lord''s Table, because I am there to come under Vows, which I know before hand I sha n''t keep?
A32091Thus for instance, a Vow of Celibacy is unwarrantable, because there are few can safely bear it: and who can say he is in the Number of those few?
A32091To Man: Why not to God?
A32091To how flourishing a pitch of Grace might you have arriv''d?
A32091To what a confirm''d State might you by this time have been advanc''t?
A32091WHAT Treatment can you expect from Him, with whom you deal so perfidiously?
A32091WHAT are those things which divert you from that care and application, which a matter of so vast importance as this is, plainly requires?
A32091WHAT can you plead in your own Excuse?
A32091WHAT would you think of any that should go to deal with you, as you deal with the Blessed God?
A32091WHOEVER you are, if you are under Vows to God, spend a few thoughts by way of enquiry, Whether the before describ''d be not your case?
A32091WON''T your Experience teach you?
A32091Was it not because they came to the Lord''s Table, and did not discern the Lord''s Body?
A32091Was it not his Duty to own and honour God before he made that Vow?
A32091Was not this Reasonable, Just, and Fit?
A32091Was not what I did in Renewing my Vows the Effect of Consideration?
A32091What I pray hinders you?
A32091What Peace Delight and Pleasure might you have found in the ways of God?
A32091What ails thee then O my Soul?
A32091What can disturb those that thus Stay themselves on God; and are bent and determin''d to acquiesce in his Pleasure?
A32091What can engage thee to thy Duty, if not such Solemn Vows and Promises as thou hast often made?
A32091What can ever hold thee fast to thy God and Saviour, if not such bonds as thou ar ● … under?
A32091What can shake such persons hopes of Perseverance?
A32091What course must we take, that the sense of our Christian Vows may not wear off?
A32091What if he makes you smart by those very Corruptions, your indulging which, occasion''d your Renew''d Breaches?
A32091What signifies its Deliberateness, were it an hundred times as great as''t is, if thou art not to be prevail''d on to keep thy Vow?
A32091What signifies the Vow they then came under, tho''ever so Solemn?
A32091What would this be but to do that in Spirituals, which you would blame as unaccountable and amazing Folly in common and civil Affairs?
A32091What''s to be done in this great strait?
A32091What, I pray, hinders us from using that rightly, which they have abus''d?
A32091What, I say, can it avail to such Persons?
A32091Whence comes the Difference that is so discernible even among real Christians, who all are sincere?
A32091Whence comes this?
A32091Whence is it that in this case you are so undisturb''d?
A32091Whence is it that that little Good, that little Grace that is in you is so withering pining and languishing?
A32091Whether any Branch of it is liable to any just Exceptions?
A32091Whether it contains any thing impossible to a willing Mind?
A32091Whether there is not the highest Reason running thro''it?
A32091Whether they do n''t cordially give up themselves to God the Father, Son, and Spirit, according to the tenour of it?
A32091Whether those who refuse to come under it, or being under it, to obey it, are not Enemies to themselves, as well as to God?
A32091Who can express the Comfort which such Persons may derive from such Promises as these?
A32091Who can fore- see what Publick Calamaties a wait us, wherein all particular Persons must unavoidably be sharers?
A32091Who can pretend to steer exactly in such a strait?
A32091Who knows what Personal or Domestiek Troubles they may meet withe''er they Dye?
A32091Who would do any thing to rejoice his worst and bitterest Enemy, and put him in a capacity of doing him an inconceivable Mischief?
A32091Why art thou cast down O my Soul?
A32091Why art thou so stupid and sensless?
A32091Why come you there if this be not the Sense of your Souls?
A32091Why didst thou go to make new Vows, unless thou resolvedst to live answerably to them?
A32091Why didst thou not lay aside the Christian Name, if thou didst not seriously intend a Christian Life?
A32091Why dost thou now continue to heap Bonds upon Bonds, and Vows upon Vows, if thou art really unwilling of that to which thou Engagest thy self?
A32091Why so Base, Unworthy and False?
A32091Will you go on to add Bond upon Bond, and heap Vows upon Vows, and never in earnest begin to pay?
A32091Will you leave the same Gaps open by which Dulness and Formality formerly crept in upon you?
A32091Will you own your Parents power to engage you for a Trifle, and not in order to an Everlasting Crown?
A32091Without thinking what thou didst, what thou wer''t about, and what all these things meant?
A32091Would you care to have any more to do with them?
A32091and doth not he afterwards see how soon you grow cold, and dead, and dull again; returning to former Remissness?
A32091and how little you are influenc''d by renewed and repeated Vows?
A32091and might you not be much more diligent, and watchful, and circumspect, and provident, and serious, than you are?
A32091and shall not the Thought of his Inspection awe and affect you?
A32091and will you be careless and remiss even while he looks on?
A32091and will you never learn to keep close to God?
A32091whence is it that he frowns upon you, and withdraws his presence and his aids in any measure from you?
A32091who would care a rush for such a Contract, if he knew the engag''d Party would look no further?
A47535''t is a positive Law, we must go to the Pleasure, and Will, and Design of the Law- maker: what may not Men infer after this sort?
A47535( instead of saying, Who can forbid Water?)
A47535( when they asked what they should do?)
A4753517. and that he thanked God he baptized no more of them than Crispus and Gaius, and the Houshold of Stephanus?
A475352. or by preaching the Word of Christ?
A4753528. or act and do contrary thereto, who requires all Disciples to be baptized?
A4753532, 34. these two Verses being a Key to the 33d Verse,( saith he) and this Houshold a Key to all the other?
A47535And are not Males and Femals all o ● ● in Christ Jesus?
A47535And are there not many very learned Men who are against baptizing them?
A47535And do you not think that many of the Females of Abraham''s off- spring were in that Covenant of Grace?
A47535And doth not these things hinder that glorious Reformation we all long for, and encourage Papists?
A47535And that Baptism is absolutely necessary to Church- Communion, or an initiating Ordinance?
A47535And why should a Tradition of the Antichristian State, be so zealously defended?
A47535And, were they not to teach the same Doctrine, and administer the same Ordinances alike where- ever they come?
A47535Aquinas asserts, which is intailed upon all within the pale thereof?
A47535Are Infants capable thus to covenant with God?
A47535Are not Sureties in Baptism a meer human Invention?
A47535Are not Women as well as Men, comprehended and meant in those places as well as Men, tho not expressed?
A47535Are they not both expresly given forth and joined together by our Saviour in this his last and great Commission?
A47535As if he had said, if there be no Resurrection, Why are we baptized?
A47535Ay, this is good News indeed, they might say; But what will become of our Children, our Off- spring?
A47535BVT what harm is there in Baptizing of Children?
A47535Besides, are Bells forbidden to be baptized?
A47535Besides, doth not our Saviour plainly intimate, that John''s Baptism was directly from Heaven, and not of Men?
A47535Besides, were not the Pharisees and Lawyers learned Men, who rejected the Counsel of God against themselves, being not baptized?
A47535But all this while, who has required any thing of this at our Hands?
A47535But are they uncapable because there is no word of Institution, nothing from the Mouth of Christ or his Apostles, to justifie such a Practice?
A47535But do you not acknowledg Baptism to signify our being washed in the Blood of Christ?
A47535But does not Baptism come in the room of Circumcision, the one being a Figure of the other?
A47535But doth not Christ say, that the Doctrine he taught, he received from the Father who sent him?
A47535But had not John an express Commission to baptize?
A47535But how dare any presume to Rantize a Babe that is uncapable to be taught or made a Disciple by teaching?
A47535But how does it appear that Infants are Believers in any sense?
A47535But since the practice of Baptism in Water was lost in the Apostacy, how could it be restored again without a new Mission?
A47535But whereas you say, Baptism was always done by dipping the Body all over in Water, how can that be, since some were baptized in Houses?
A47535But why are they not?
A47535But why may ● ot Infants be baptized now as well as Children were circumcised heretofore?
A47535But why must the whole Body be dipp''d?
A47535But yet this Baptism however was by a pouring forth of the Spirit, and why may not Baptism be administred so?
A47535But you lay too much stress upon Baptism?
A47535But, Sirs, who- ever washes Hands, Cups, Pots, or Beds, by sprinkling a few Drops of VVater upon them?
A47535Ca n''t God save poor Infants without they also do believe?
A47535Ca n''t God save poor dying Infants, unless the same change by the Spirits Operations pass upon them?
A47535Can any Man forbid Water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
A47535Can any Man forbid Water, that these should not be baptized?
A47535Can any believe God would command any such thing to be done, that should endanger the Life of a Child?
A47535Can they answer a good Conscience, by believing the Resurrection of Christ?
A47535Can they covenant with God?
A47535Come put it to your Consciences; Can you suppose any should be baptized by virtue of the words of Christ in the Commission, but Disciples only?
A47535Could the Apostle in plainer words have detected the Error of these Men, if he had met with them in his day?
A47535Did God forbid Abraham to circumcise his Female Children, or forbid him to circumcise his Male Children on the ninth day?
A47535Did Moses deal thus with the Children of Israel?
A47535Did any Man assert till now the Baptism of Christ to be a Legal Rite, or rather that it sprung from Human Tradition?
A47535Did the Apostle intend hereby, do you think, to press them all to die to Sin, and live to God?
A47535Did the whole Church of the Romans reckon themselves, think you, to be dead to Sin, and bound to live no longer therein?
A47535Do not secret things belong to him, what Vanity is there in the minds of some Men?
A47535Does not this Argument make void the Baptism of Infants, as well as Adult Unbelievers, by the Ancients?
A47535Doth he baptize?
A47535Doth it follow that we must Baptize so now?
A47535Doth not our Blessed Saviour''s Words immediately following fully answer this Objection, and, lo I am with you always to the end of the World?
A47535Doth not the Apostle shew that Men had Power to give the Spirit?
A47535Fifthly, Doth Baptism confer Grace or regenerate the Child?
A47535For was that Rubbish gone, what a glorious Harmony would follow, even such a Day as would make all our Souls rejoyce?
A47535Grant she had Children, how unlikely a matter is it, saith he, that she should carry them about with her, trading so many miles distant?
A47535Has God ordained Baptism to be an Ordinance to save the Souls of any Persons, either the Adult or Infants?
A47535Has not Christ Power to preserve, protect, and uphold all such Persons which he commands to be Baptized?
A47535Has the Holy Trinity given you any Authority so to do?
A47535Hath Christ any where required it?
A47535Hath Christ, I say, or his Apostles, as you read, forbid these things, and many more of like nature?
A47535Have they a justifying Faith, as Mr. Baxter intimates?
A47535Have you a Dispensation to make the Commandments of God void by your Traditions?
A47535How can Water, a material thing, work upon the Soul in a Physical manner?
A47535How can Water, an external thing, work upon the Soul in a physical manner?
A47535How dare you deny a Man admittance into the Church, who is truly Godly, and hath a lively Faith?
A47535How dares any Man, who fears God, attempt to do any thing contrary to the Holy Pattern left in Christ''s New Testament?
A47535How little is the Institution or Practice of the Primitive Christians minded amongst many good Men?
A47535How often must we tell you that Baptism wholly depends, as to Subject, Time, End, and manner of Administration, on the words of Institution?
A47535How palpable is it that Godly Men have wicked Children now adays as well as in former times?
A47535How then can you justify your selves in such a Practice?
A47535I am, saith Christ, to be baptized with Blood, overwhelmed with Sufferings and Afflictions; are you able so to be?
A47535I have heard some say, Is it my where forbid?
A47535I wonder what Faith''t is you suppose to be in Infants?
A47535If God should have sent a Saint from the Dead, to let us know what we should do, would we not give all diligent heed to him?
A47535If he hath a right to Christ, who is signified in the Lord''s Supper, may be be denied the Sign, because he is not baptized?
A47535If you ca n''t prove this, what signifies all you say?
A47535In the Name of the Glorious Trinity, can they say and prove it, Christ hath given them any such Authority?
A47535In the Rubrick, What is required of Persons that are to be baptized?
A47535Is it necessary you should alter any of his Holy Laws, and make void one of the great Sacraments of the New Testament by your Traditions?
A47535Is it not a false thing to say, Persons may believe and be saved by the Faith of others?
A47535Is it not a foolish thing and a Lye, to say, Children have Faith, and are Disciples, who are not capable of Understanding?
A47535Is it not a foolish thing to cry out against Traditions, and all Inventions of Men, and yet strive to uphold and maintain them?
A47535Is it not a weak thing, to open a Door into the Church, which Christ hath shut up?
A47535Is it not an evil and false thing to say, Persons may have Grace and Regeneration before they know God, or are called by his Word and holy Spirit?
A47535Is it not an evil and harmful thing, and a great error to say, Baptism takes away Original Sin?
A47535Is it not an hurtful and evil thing, to defile and p ● lute the Church, by bringing in the Fleshy Seed which Christ hath cast out?
A47535Is it not necessary for you to do what Christ hath commanded, and when at no time there is any danger of the Lives of Persons?
A47535Is it not strange that you should say, That none but the Children of Believers ought to be Baptized?
A47535Is not God a free Agent?
A47535Is not Truth and Righteousness to be joyned with Peace and Love?
A47535Is not Woman as well as Man intended there?
A47535Is not this a meer trifling Vanity, and nought but a piece of Foolery and Deceit, to darken Counsel with words without Knowledg?
A47535Is this good Divinity with Mr. Smythies?
A47535Is this the way to that longed- for Reformation?
A47535It was not too low for him, and is it too low for thee?
A47535May I not argue thus; If Teaching continues to the end of the World, Baptism continues?
A47535Moreover, what express word against Infants receiving the Sacraments?
A47535Must Christ forbid Infant- Baptism?
A47535Must he needs baptize them because he took them up in his Arms?
A47535Nay, can we think Christ would institute an Ordinance to destroy the Lives of any Persons?
A47535Nay, worse, a Tradition of Men?
A47535Now do you see that all the Children of Believers have the Grace of God bestowed upon them, so that they are new Creatures?
A47535Now the Question is, What we are to understand to be meant by the Baptism of the Holy Ghost?
A47535Now, are Children capable to do any of this?
A47535Or is it an Imputitive Faith from the Parents in Covenant, as Musculus and others maintain?
A47535Or, did God forbid Nadab and Abihu to offer strange Fire, who were destroyed for doing it?
A47535Or, did he tell them they should Baptize those in hot Countries that were Disciples, and Rantize such who received the Word in cold Countries?
A47535Or, is it the Faith of the Gossip or Surety, as many of your Church say, i. e. others believe for them?
A47535Or, is not that they call Baptism, in your Consciences a Nullity?
A47535Or, were they in it, and are they now fallen out of it?
A47535Ordinances or Sacraments of Christ?
A47535Ought you not to make God''s VVord your Rule?
A47535Secondly, But why do you say Children must be Believers, or else they ca n''t be saved?
A47535Secondly, We ask, whether God hath left it in the Power of the Parent to save or destroy the Soul of his Child, which your Doctrine doth import?
A47535Sir, I will appeal to you, is not this Inference as good and as justifiable as yours?
A47535Sirs, How dare you, In the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, say, I Baptize thee,& c. when you do but Rantize the Person?
A47535Sirs, wherefore do you judg it reasonable, and not necessary?
A47535Sometimes there has been some such like Action done I must confess: But does not the Prince actually consent so to be married?
A47535Speak, are they Baptized?
A47535The Minor is easily proved: Can any thing reflect more upon the Honour of Christ,& c. than this?
A47535Thirdly, We demand what hopes are intended, and by what Scriptures the same are annexed to the Administration of an Ordinance in Infancy?
A47535This savours of horrible Pride: Shall Man prescribe unto God ways how he shall be worshipped?
A47535To contemn this Order,( saith he) is to contemn all Rules of Order: for where can we expect to find it, if not here?
A47535To which I answer, where are such things as Crossings, Salt, Spittle, and Sureties,& c. forbid?
A47535VVere they not to go into cold Countries as well as Hot?
A47535Was not Lot a Godly Man, and in the same Covenant of Grace?
A47535Was not that Church set up to be a Patern, or perfect Copy, after which all succeeding Churches were to write?
A47535Well, what tho?
A47535Well, what though that be so?
A47535Were any ever baptized with the Holy Spirit in the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost?
A47535Were not Women Disciples, and commanded to be made discipline by the preaching of the Gospel in the Commission, as well as Men?
A47535Were not Women Members of the Chur ● ● ▪ and does not the Holy Supper belong to all ● ● ● ● lar Members thereof?
A47535Were not Women as well as Men( who believed) Baptized?
A47535Were these little Children be ye sure the Children of Believers?
A47535What Confusion is here among the Pedo- Baptists?
A47535What Ordinance hath he ordained to signify the sprinkling of the Blood of Christ?
A47535What a Covenant then do you make that sure and everlasting Covenant of Grace to be?
A47535What abundance of Betrayers of the Truth and Church too have we in these days?
A47535What is this but to intail Grace to Nature, and Regeneration to Generation?
A47535What resemblance of the Burial and Resurrection of Christ is in Sprinkling?
A47535What was that?
A47535What will they answer him when he visiteth them?
A47535What will they say when God rises up?
A47535When shall we see the like proof for Babes Baptism?
A47535Who can justifie you in this Practice?
A47535Who can require Water, that these Persons should be Baptized, who have received the Holy Spirit as well as we?
A47535Who now can conclude rationally, that any Children were in any of these Housholds?
A47535Who tells them so?
A47535Why do you not believe the Apostle who tells you the quite contrary, and that he said not of Seeds as of many, but to thy Seed, which is Christ?
A47535Why may not that Text be a Proof that Bells in Churches should be baptized, and so made holy likewise?
A47535Why may they not deny Preaching to continue, as well as Baptizing, since Teaching is commanded by no other Authority than this?
A47535Yet are not you contented to lie short in doing this according to the Sentiments of your Minds and Understandings?
A47535You may as well ask, why Nadab and Abihu might not have offered strange Fire, or why might not the Priest?
A47535You will object, May be that Bells are not ● it nor capable Subjects of such an Ordinance?
A47535and because he blessed them, must he receive them into his Church?
A47535and have not our Brethren cast it away as such?
A47535and might he therefore do these things — because God did no where tell him he should not do so?
A47535and to make the Church National, which ought to be Congregational?
A47535and where is the Spirit of Reformation?
A47535and yet they were not, from that Ground, to be circumcised, nor were they at all circumcised, because God did not command them so to be?
A47535as if John should say, that is a sign he is sent of God: and do all Men come to him?
A47535believing Men and Women; is it not necessary for you to do Christ''s Work, as Christ has required?
A47535can it do the Child any hurt?
A47535can we think that others ever attained to the like, much less to greater Light and Knowledg than they?
A47535do they rather go to him to be baptized than come to me?
A47535doth he say they ought, or that it belongs to them?
A47535has God told you he can not, or will not save them except they believe?
A47535hath Christ said indeed, ye shall not baptize Bells?
A47535in token of such a Communion with the Power of his Death, as to kill Sin, and crucifie the old Man, so that henceforth we should not serve Sin?
A47535is it not an innocent thing?
A47535is it therefore lawful to baptize them?
A47535is that requisite, or would it make the Estate the more firm or sure to him?
A47535is the Opus operatum of Baptism, think you, a likely way or means to beget or bring forth Children to Christ, or make Disciples of them?
A47535is there any Argument or Scripture brought by this Man to prove them so to be?
A47535may he not do what he pleases, and magnifie his Grace to poor dying Infants, through the Blood of his Son, in other ways than we know of?
A47535may not the Head be sufficient, that being the principal Part?
A47535might there not be a Pond, or some River near?
A47535must he declare in plain words they ought not to be baptized, or else may they, ought they to be baptized?
A47535nay, a prophanation of the Sacrament of Baptism?
A47535or a dogmatical Faith only, as in Mr. Blake''s Sense?
A47535or can Baptism appear to be a Symbol of it to them?
A47535or those extraordinary Gifts or miraculous Effusions of the Holy Ghost only, which many received in the Primitive Times?
A47535such and such good Men and able Ministers did say this was a Truth and my Duty?
A47535that ye shall not go on Pilgrimages, nor pray for the Dead?
A47535therefore we are buried with him in Baptism into Death,& c. Else what shall they do that are baptized for the Dead, if the Dead rise not at all?
A47535to assert a thing that no Man has any ground to believe, nor ca n''t, without offering violence to his Reason?
A47535together with Melchisedec and others I might mention?
A47535what else is the meaning of these words, he therefore that ministreth to you the Spirit?
A47535wherein are they uncapable?
A47535whether the sanctifying Gifts and Graces of the Spirit are intended hereby, which all the Godly receive?
A47535which being so ▪ how uncertain is your Inference?
A47535who made you one of his Privy- Council?
A47535who say''t is an Invention of Men and no Ordinance of Jesus Christ?
A47535who told you so?
A47535— How can outward Water, saith Mr. Charnock, convey inward- Life?
A47535● ut why will not our Brethren keep to the great Insti ● ution, and exact Rule of the Primitive Church?
A10833( as notwithstanding sin, he doth some feeble remainders thereof) and therewith right to eternall life?
A108331,& 4, speaks of the seal of the spirit, means he, that the Spirit makes a materiall print in the soule, as a seal doth in Wax?
A1083310, then what needed hee after to haue been circumcised?
A1083311,) goe to, and teach all Nations?
A1083318?
A1083323. who upon Christs words to Peter touching ▪ Iohn, If I will that he tarry till ▪ I come, what is that to thee?
A108333, the Covenant is mentioned, I am the God thy father Abraham& c. But is every mentioning of a Covenant, the making of it?
A108336, All flesh shall see the salvation of our God: But I demand, of what sight of Christ Iohn here speaketh?
A108338, If we,& c. Was it possible that Paul should preach any other Gospell?
A10833And I would know of these deep Divines, what but sin could possibly make Adams posterity unable to keep the Law?
A10833And are not the Sacraments outward helps of comfort and confirmation of a beleevers heart in the same loue of God, and hope of glory?
A10833And are remembrances of a false Christ means of salvation?
A10833And are there not many in all Churches, who, without a miracle, can not possibly attain to any competent ability to teach publiquely in the Church?
A10833And can the flock be fed as it ought without preaching, and where the bread of life is not broken unto it?
A10833And considering, that the death, and destruction of the wicked is Gods own just and holy work, for their sins, who will deny that God delights in it?
A10833And did God make a Covenant with, and become the God of Abraham, Isaak, and Iakob, at that time?
A10833And how a father?
A10833And how doe these see the salvation of God in Christ?
A10833And how then belongs it not to Pastours, to whom these things belong, to convert?
A10833And indeed what exposition can be given, or evasion found, considering the expressenes of the words?
A10833And is election, and the promise of election a work of our loue to God, or of Gods to us?
A10833And lastly, how contemptuous of their gifts and graces, how eminent soever?
A10833And see we not here what new Patrons dumb ministers haue gotten; of whom the old almost every where are ashamed?
A10833And shall not all the elect be so kept for ever in heaven?
A10833And to what end, or with what order should hee thrust in an impertinent discourse of any other faith?
A10833And was there not that required at Abrahams hands for his circumcision, which was not required at Isaaks for his?
A10833And were not the Infants part of Israel, thus set apart, and sanctified?
A10833And what are all these things with them?
A10833And what is his heart but the faculties of his understanding, will and affections, which sin possesseth and corrupteth?
A10833And what is the reason why the one receivs it, and not the other?
A10833And what then?
A10833And where now resteth his wickednesse, but in his heart?
A10833And whereas it might be objected against the certainty of this promise and event: What?
A10833And will these male- parts then sue him at the law, if he have held that course of justice towards some, which was due to all?
A10833Are any Christs but Christians?
A10833Are exhortations and convictions by sound doctrine no preachings with these men?
A10833Are not all Gods judgements good and righteous?
A10833Are not they that beleev, and repent Christians with them?
A10833Are the Infants of beleevers to be cast out for their persequutions?
A10833Are they certain they are ignorant of, and erre in nothing in the Scriptures, written for their bearning?
A10833BVT who hath sayd, that God wils sin, though not for sin?
A10833Besides, if the Apostle had argued as they would haue him, where had he laid the foundation of his proofe?
A10833But I would know by what gift of the Spirit any becoms a Baptizer, or able to baptize?
A10833But I would know, what comfort it could be to their perplexed hearts, to think, that God suffered them to doe wickedly, that is, hindred them not?
A10833But first, why put they preaching, and not prophesying, as the Text, and all translations haue it?
A10833But how could this be, might one say, seeing Levi had then no life and being?
A10833But how proue they, that by Christs redemption they liue, moue,& c?
A10833But how proues this, that they were made either Churches or Christians by Baptism?
A10833But let them stretch the words to their own size, what follows hereupon?
A10833But may they therfore baptize them?
A10833But now what did those Heathens in this case?
A10833But now what say our Adversaries to these things?
A10833But the Evangelist in the same place teacheth them that will learn, not to interprete conditionall speeches, as absolute?
A10833But what now follows of all this for conclusion?
A10833But what then?
A10833But where haue I so spoken?
A10833But wherein, I wonder, did Pharaoh so?
A10833But why might, and may; and not ought, and must?
A10833But why rather holy, then Innocent, which they will haue all Infants to be?
A10833But yee What?
A10833By this, they should neither be saved, nor damned: for what else is it to receiv judgment of salvation, but to be saved?
A10833Can any man blesse God meerly for suffering the divell to hurt him?
A10833Can any man having grace, yea common sense, take comfort in this, that God leavs him to himselfe to doe wickedly, and hinders him not?
A10833Can that which is quite put away be still continued?
A10833Can there be use of justice for punishing, or of mercy for foregiuenesse of sin, but where sin is?
A10833Can they which are accustomed to doe evill ▪ doe well?
A10833Could David forgiue the sin of his heart?
A10833DOth mans being made of dust make him unable to resist the Tempter?
A10833Denying him at all to haue any hand in working, where they( blinde molles) can not discern how he works?
A10833Do they set themselves, as is meet, to a plain and direct answer?
A10833Doe beasts die in Adam, as his posterity doth?
A10833Doth death come over bruit beasts, because they haue sinned in Adam?
A10833Doth he in that place deal against the Infants of the Galatians, or against the men of yeares, though children in knowledg?
A10833Doth the Iudge onely suffer the punishment of the malefactors, and not inflict or procure it?
A10833Doth the child beget it selfe?
A10833Else how could all duties towards God and our neighbour be commanded in the decalogue, called the ten commandements?
A10833FIrst, if it be proper to God to justifie a sinner, how is it common to David with him?
A10833First I would know how they prove that Christ speaks of other then legall repentance, such as Ahab manifested in sack- cloth?
A10833First, they answer, that women may neither teach nor baptize in the Church: True: But why not, as they doe?
A10833Fithly, in saying, they were not all of us, he insinuates that some of them were; What?
A10833For what makes them that are alike, when the Gospel comes alike unto them, not to remain alike stil?
A10833For who knows not, that Gods calling us, goes before our answering him by faith, and obedience, as the cause therof?
A10833For, Who can understand his errours?
A10833Friend, how comest thou hither, not having on a wedding garment?
A10833Hath God entred Covenant with unbeleevers to be their God, as he hath done with all to whom Circumcision appertained?
A10833Hath not God so kept the elect Angels without all change from their primitiue purity?
A10833Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honor, and another to dishonor?
A10833Hath the faith of a person fellowship with the Saints?
A10833Haue his children that which he for substance had not; even in that wherein he was their father?
A10833How injurious in relating their own mis- formed collections, for their opinions?
A10833How many 1000 thousands are there at this day, which never so much as heard of Christ, at least, as God and man; and Redeemer of mankind by his death?
A10833How necessarily and inavoydably, from his choyce of will which was free in it self either to that act, or to another of that kinde, or to neither?
A10833How preposterous are these mens waies, who will haue the seal so long before the Covenant?
A10833How sought he justification by the works of the Law?
A10833How then could his hand and counseli determine before whatsoever was done?
A10833How then could that particular event follow unchangeably from his changeable will?
A10833I suppose it was never seen, that salt wanted saltnesse: and if it doe, how is it salt?
A10833I would know of them how the drinking of poyson by any is unavoydable?
A10833I would now know whether it could so come to passe, that these Apostles should not, and that willingly, preach this Gospell, and the truths thereof?
A10833If all the body were one member, where were the body, or Church, saith the Apostle?
A10833If any demand, Was not Christ promised to the Gentiles also?
A10833If it be asked, to what end then serves the fearfull denunciation used?
A10833If not, as is plain, how were their Baptism a Sacrament in the lawfull use?
A10833If their persons be dead, how remain they?
A10833If they were chosen out of the world, which lyeth in wickednesse, and hates the good; for what good qualities, trow we, were they chosen?
A10833If yea, why not then sin, and the guilt thereof, by proportion, having sinned?
A10833Is Gods raysing up( which is his hardening, v. 8,) nothing but his letting a man lie still, and fall down lower then he was before?
A10833Is it his freewill to receiv it, to whom it is preached?
A10833Is it not of meer mercie that he calls any to life?
A10833Is it not sinne not to doe that wee should doe; and to doe nothing when we should doe something?
A10833Is not our Lords Supper the same in effect with their Passeover?
A10833Is not the destroying and corrupting of mens faith and obedience, the plucking them out of the hand of God?
A10833Is not the justice of God infinite, and so requiring infinite satisfaction?
A10833Is not the lump and the first fruits one?
A10833Is not to labour in the word and doctrine here spoken of, for him to preach, and that as an Elder; as the former rule, as Elders?
A10833Is repentance so with these men?
A10833Is to deliver by determinate counsell, to suffer onely?
A10833Is to do to suffer with these men?
A10833It is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him onely shalt thou serue?
A10833Lastly, how wyde, and wilde are they in expounding the allegory of Abrahams two sons?
A10833Lastly, their exposition of these words, Why hast thou made me thus?
A10833Let them shew a way, how they can now come to Christ, saue by Baptism?
A10833Likewise, when a man or beast halts in going, shall we imagine that the halting is the very motion of going, or the fault of the motion onely?
A10833Many are called, but few chosen, that many qualities are called, and few chosen?
A10833Nay, but O man, who art thou that disputest with God?
A10833Now doe they conceaue, that such as were no true Christians before, are in part made Christians by the Lords Supper, and laying on of hands?
A10833Now what is it for the Gentiles, to haue had the Law written in their hearts, in or by nature, as the Apostle speaks?
A10833Now will these gainsaying spirits have men blessed by the law whether God will, or no?
A10833O the depth of the riches both of the wisedom and knowledge of God?
A10833Of what sin of his mother was David guilty?
A10833One man, or woman either, may upon just ground, separate from a whole Church: may he, or she therfore excommunicate a whole Church?
A10833Or are not these things plainly spoken of the person of men?
A10833Or did Hymeneus his faith sometimes hold faith and a good conscience, and after put them away?
A10833Or did it not onely, declare and confirm that state of grace, in and unto which God had called them?
A10833Or doth not the parent onely beget it?
A10833Or hath I. M. excommunicated the whole Church of England?
A10833Or how can any more directly crosse the Apostle, then they doe?
A10833Or how can qualities be either called, or chosen to grace or glory?
A10833Or how doth God send the spirit, thus understood, to work regeneration in men?
A10833Or how doth this example of Esau fit their imagined plain exposition?
A10833Or how had he removed the scruple out of the Corinthians hearts?
A10833Or how they can haue right in his blessing, and yet haue no right in his bloud- shed, and in Baptism, for the signifying and applying it?
A10833Or if it can be interrupted and broken off, how is it everlasting and eternall?
A10833Or if the fathers put him quite away, how can the children haue, or make any remembrance, or acknowledgment of him, having no new offer of him?
A10833Or might Iohn, without a special calling, haue instituted and brought into the Church, as he did, a new ordinance?
A10833Or not more of such Heathenish men of yeares as became Proselytes, then of their Infants, to be circumcised with them?
A10833Or not rather of some, both of singular abilities, and speciall calling?
A10833Or not this onely, that it helps to confirm, and comfort a Christian inwardly in the loue of God, and hope of salvation?
A10833Or to what purpose should he mention the sign of Circumcision, as a seal of faith, if not of that faith, of which he treats?
A10833Or were he an Angell from heaven, or of God that should so doe?
A10833Or what barre would these men haue put against the power of God, if his will had been so to haue preserved and kept Adam?
A10833Or what, and which were the Churches which they so made, and gathered?
A10833Or will these men never leav their godlesse custom of corrupting the words of the text, for advantaging of an evill cause?
A10833Or will they( vain men) conjure him herein within the narrow circle of their understanding?
A10833Otherwise, How doe they baptize them?
A10833Out of what, I marvail, and for what persequutions?
A10833Paul and Apollos, and Cephas are the Churches, and is not their baptism theirs?
A10833Saith not the scripture, that by the law all are accursed?
A10833Secondly, I demand, what it was, in which Iakob typed out beleevers, seeking righteousnesse by God?
A10833Secondly, for sinne, who was ever so wicked as to imagine that God takes pleasure in it?
A10833Secondly, the Pastor as Pastor of the flock, and feeding it, may convert a stranger comming in: and why then not baptize him by their own ground?
A10833Shall Infants( which they affirm else- where) be glorified in the Kingdom of heaven, and yet are they not of it?
A10833Shall they return though they repent not, nor seek the Lord, but remain rebellious, as they haue been, and their fore- fathers before them?
A10833Should we now say, that to take her by the hand, and lift her up, were nothing but to touch her hand?
A10833Signes and Seals are not to be set to blankes, neither doe they make things that were not before, to be?
A10833THeir next question is, How consider you these words: Who hath resisted his will?
A10833Tell me, you poore seduced soules, doth not the Lord here threaten a judgement from him to come upon David for his sin?
A10833The Lord would haue all the wicked cut off from his people: and would he haue unbeleevers received unto them?
A10833The question is not whether if any should not abide in the bounty of God, they were to be cut off or no?
A10833The words v. 19, Thou wilt then say unto me, why doth he yet finde fault, for who hath resisted his will?
A10833They frame the question; whether any but Pastors or Elders may baptize?
A10833They take that for granted, in which the maine question lyeth; and laying such foundations, what can their building bee?
A10833They themselues confesse, that the devils are unchangeable in evill; And why then might not both Angels and men be unchangeable in good?
A10833Thirdly, Is it to be conceived, that the Apostle would complain( as heere he doth) that lying spirits did not continue with the Churches?
A10833Very well said; God justly punisheth the Iewes by the Assirians; and how doth he that his just work?
A10833Was every beleever to covet spirituall gifts, to wit, all both extraordinary and ordinary there mentioned?
A10833Was it not an holy Ordinance of God?
A10833Was it the seal of the righteousnesse of faith; and yet due to the faithlesse?
A10833Was not the Lord Iesus in his Manhood so kept upon earth?
A10833Was righteousnesse ever, or is it imputed to any for justification, but by faith in Christ, then promised, now exhibited?
A10833Were any made before the first?
A10833Were they such as had once truely beleeved, but had after made defection?
A10833What can be more plain against these men?
A10833What course then are we to hold with them?
A10833What is it, if this be not, for the unlearned and unstable to pervert the Scriptures to their own destruction?
A10833What is the meaning of the hardening of Pharaoh?
A10833What quality but of sin, and misery, sees the Lord in them whom he calleth?
A10833What should I say more?
A10833What words could the Holy Ghost make choise of more liuelily to expresse Gods effectuall work, according to his eternall purpose?
A10833When the candle is put out, and it becomes dark; shall we think that any reall thing comes into the house, and causes the darknes?
A10833Where hath God ever so spoken, or any other man before them?
A10833Which of us ever so held or practized?
A10833Who having common sense, will say, that Christ and his righteousnesse; and the chusing of a man, or his election, are all one?
A10833Who so professedly despised the God therof, saying, Who is the Lord that I should obey his voyce?
A10833Who then were these exemplary Iews, formerly cut off by the Lord from the oliue tree?
A10833Why might he not as well haue used some ordinary disciple neer at hand?
A10833Why not then thus?
A10833Will these men affoord God no more, or other work?
A10833Will these men compare their conceited gift of converting, with Iohns divine, and extraordinary charter and endowments?
A10833Will they deny any inward work of Gods spirit at all, above the words work, though in, and by it?
A10833Will they make the grace of the Gospell a debt from God to men, or a matter of meer grace, and mercie?
A10833Would it haue been any diminution of his perfection, and happinesse if he had not so done?
A10833Yea I would know, which of Iohns disciples ever offered to baptize?
A10833and but just if he leave all to themselves, and their own affected ignorances and lusts?
A10833and in which Esau typed out workers, seeking justification by their own works?
A10833and is the doing of the contrary to doe no evill?
A10833and that as many, as are of the works of the law are accursed; as being unable to keep it?
A10833how unsearchable are his judgements, and his waies past finding out?
A10833or do I not onely keep the light and Sun- shine from it?
A10833or how gather they that to haue been my meaning?
A10833or when I make a shadow by standing in the light, or Sun- shine; do I put any reall thing in the place where the shadow is?
A10833shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, why hast thou made me thus?
A10833some lying spirits of the Spirit of truth?
A10833which is, not in the Church; but out of it, and in a corner, where, it may be, none is present but the baptizer and baptized?
A10833yea, are they not directly for the conversion of gainsayers?
A58206* Corpus Christi naturale fuit verè sepultum; an putandum est nostra corpora eodom modo sepeliri in administratine baptismi?
A582061,& c. what, would you have your disciples baptized with the sprie of two neighboring seas, and a cloud of fresh water raining on their heads?
A582061. quis enim potest dare quod ipse n ● n habeat?
A5820610. who( of any sense) doth not understand that of those that can, and will not?
A5820614. pronounceth in the present) by a designation to the service of Jesus Christ, and the future participation of the promises?
A5820621. of what?
A582063 20, 21. what, must the type and truth agree in all things?
A5820636: see here is water, what doth let me to be baptized?
A582064 When the Apostle saith the unbelieving husband is sanctified in the wife; if any ask, what wife?
A582065 If the matter must be put upon express words of Scripture, let our Antagonists shew us where they are expresly forbidden to baptize Infants?
A58206A gallant flourish indeed: but seriously; Did Christ take them up in his arms, and bless them; and are they not blessed?
A58206Again, Baptism is administred with the words of institution by Christ appointed; take away the Word, and what is the Water but ordinary water?
A58206And I pray how could the Priest under the Law know the minds of children to be circum ● ● sed?
A58206And again, who is eaten with the zeal of Gods house?
A58206And if a quality, of what kind it is?
A58206And what solidity is there on these conjectures, to conclude that Hieroms parents, though Christian, defer''d his baptism until he was 30 years old?
A58206And where is then their answer of a good conscience toward God?
A58206And who is so ready to cast this odious Livery upon others, as the most Antichristian?
A58206And why can not God as well do his mercies to infants now immediatly, as he did before the institution either of circumcision or baptism?
A58206And why is it more proportionable to an act of reason and humanity to defer childrens baptism, then in due time to baptize them?
A58206But let us hear the rest of Tertullians advice; was it only concerning the deferring infants baptism?
A58206But to what purpose do you propose any of these examples to your clients imitation?
A58206But what follows?
A58206But what if they never marry, must they never be baptized?
A58206But what is crucifying again?
A58206But what other battalio''s come next up?
A58206But you demand, if it implies a duty on our part; how then can children receive it, who can not do duty at all?
A58206But you say, Circumcision left a Character in the flesh, which being imprinted upon Infants, did it work upon them when they came to age?]
A58206But you say, — The infant is not capable of believing, and if he were, he were also capable of dissenting; and how then do they know his mind?]
A58206By demanding, quanta est major Propositio?
A58206Can any be saved without such grace?
A58206Can there be a sound conclusion from rotten premises?
A58206Can you be assured that none of these who are baptized in infancy, and no otherwise, are regenerate and saved?
A58206Could they if sent into Painim- Countreys with all the terms of your supposition, have been more disposed to an actual belief without a new Master?
A58206Did their Baptizers profane Baptism?
A58206Do any creatures under the degrees of man, bear the image of their Creator, in immortality, sanctity and light of understanding?
A58206Do they say so when they speak of infant- baptism?
A58206Do we then complain against God, when we complain of the Anabaptists abridging children of that which God hath allowed them?
A58206Do you account obedience to God and his holy ordinances, to be a tempting of God?
A58206Do you also call the truth thereof in question?
A58206Do you mean by the Holy Ghost, the gifts and graces of Gods holy Spirit regenerating the elect to the Kingdome of Heaven?
A58206Do you think there is no danger from infants original guilt which maks them stand in need of the laver of regeneration for the remission of their sin?
A58206Doth God save any Infants?
A58206Doth it follow therefore a man may make confession of Christ with his mouth to salvation, before he believeth in him in his heart?
A58206Doth not Gods blessing give both end and means that we may be so?
A58206Doth the Scripture, 21 ● saying all flesh dyed — every man — meane onely all of reason and age?
A58206God created him- male and female created be them: both one flesh, and so but one — and wherefore one?
A58206God hath appointed baptism to be a seal and token of our receiving and entrance into the Church; is it to no purpose to obey him in his Ordinances?
A58206How can any meer man know whom to baptize, though of years, and whom to put by?
A58206How doth that appear?
A58206How invalid is the Moderators Agument, à non scripto, ad nonfactum?
A58206How know you that John B. or the Apostles never baptized any Infants?
A58206How many impertinences are here twisted up together?
A58206How many ridiculous consequences would you thence inferre?
A58206How much more rationally may he make covenant with infants, though yet without the actuall use of reason?
A58206How often hath Satan in tempting to sin, misled the incaucious with this suggestion, there can be no danger in it,''t is the surer way?
A58206How poor a spirited mother art thou, and of how little faith?
A58206How then shal we be renewed after our falling into sin?
A58206How vain and ma ● tious is this calumny of yours?
A58206I appeal to your own conscience, may we as well conclude against Gods word, as for it?
A58206I demand then, Do infants believe?
A58206I demand, Doth God perform every one of his promises?
A58206I demand, quojure, by what right is the Kingdom of Heaven theirs?
A58206I wonder what they will be ashamed to say, who blush not at such assertions?
A58206I would gladly be resolved, quanta est illa propositio?
A58206If any ask, why it comes out so late to publike view?
A58206If giving the Seal to those who can not be profited thereby, be profanation of the same, how often do you prophane the holy Seal?
A58206If it be a ceremony only, how doth it sanctifie us, or make the comers thereunto perfect?
A58206If it be a duty on our part to administer it ● how can children receive it, who can not do any duty at all?
A58206If it be necessary to baptism that the baptizer know the mind of the person to be baptized, how can you baptize men of years?
A58206If it implys a duty on our part, how then can children receive it, who can not do duty at all?]
A58206If not, how maliciously is this objected against us, baptizing Infants of Believers, Christ himself expresly avowing them as subjects of his Kingdom?
A58206If not, why inferre you them?
A58206If this argument were good, how many men and women of age, must by the same reason be denyed baptism?
A58206If you do not, why do you urge against us an authority which your self consenteth not unto?
A58206If you mean the second, that is, that we less know the truth then the evidence; what blame you in our cause, or advantage your Clients?
A58206If you say we see no evidence, nor can the blind see the Sun; what can you gain hereby?
A58206If you will have none baptized before the works of the Spirit, before the operations of grace,& c. when and whom may you baptize?
A58206If( you say) by the external work alone, how doth this differ from the opus operatum of Papists, save that it is worse?
A58206In which it seemeth to us a very weak querie, And why can not God as well do his mercies to Infants now immediately?
A58206Is not the Scripture evident?
A58206Must this be by vertue of baptism by water onely, or the externall ministration thereof?
A58206Nay but tell me, if you can, by all your reason, how could infants receive baptism except we did administer it?
A58206No man rationally asketh, What need we two eyes who can see with one?
A58206Onely this( you say) that God hath as great a care of Infants, as of others,& c.] Here is another argument as fe ● ble as the fore- going: What?
A58206Or spake Christ onely concerning the carnall seed of Abraham, and not of the spirituall when he said, Of such is the Kingdom of Heaven?
A58206Popery and Pelagianism twisted together?
A58206Possibly Joash would here have replied to such a short Scheme of plea, — will ye plead for Baal?
A58206Qui rebaptizatur, jam Christianus fuerat: quomodo dici potest iterum Christianus& c?
A58206Restore such a one — but how?
A58206Scire autem?
A58206Scripture beyond the Apostles scope and purpose, rather to that which seems to favour your fancy and practise of immersion, then to another sense?
A58206Shall not they therefore that have the use of reason be baptized?
A58206Since faith is necessary to the susception of baptism,& c.] True in adult is; what is this to our present question concerning infants?
A58206So when the Prophet would recall the Jews from Polygamie to pure wedlock, he said, did not he( that is God the Creator) make one?
A58206So, v. 1. the maimed or Eunuch shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord& c. what?
A58206Speak you this as a matter doubtfull?
A58206That is the act of understanding, faith and repentance?
A58206That would be a rare invention indeed: but if to call Anabaptists Anabaptists, be just, why find you fault with it?
A58206The old Academicks were wo nt to question the testimonie and evidence of their own senses with a quid si falleris?
A58206This weakly follows from unsound premises; was there no word added to Circumcision?
A58206This you will put upon necessary consequence, where you have no express word: And why shall we not have the like liberty for Infant- Baptism?
A58206This( say you) is the greatest vanity in the world] What vanity?
A58206To the Parents or to the children?
A58206To what children was that promise made?
A58206Was not the reason of the Covenant declared to Abraham?
A58206Was that faith which the Apostle commended onely there, or then when Hierom wrote in all the Western Church?
A58206Was there not a word of Institution?
A58206We know the word( children) importeth not alwayes infants; what then?
A58206Were it good Georgicks to say, Trouble not your self to fodder your cattle, or loose them from their stall that they may drink?
A58206What Word?
A58206What are these real services, and whose?
A58206What are we nearer heaven if we are baptized?]
A58206What did vidual continency, or conjugal fidelity concern infants, as such?
A58206What do you herein say which might not as well have been objected against the circumcision of infants?
A58206What must they be interessed onely when they come to that act of which by nature they have the faculty?
A58206What need all this stirre?
A58206What promise?
A58206What the Citie of Rome?
A58206What then?
A58206What think you of the validity of that Argument which is from Gods power to his will?
A58206What think you then of our Christian Sabbath?
A58206What was it which he called Peters Chair?
A58206What yoke?
A58206What, by descent from naturall parents?
A58206What; because''t is not written?
A58206What?
A58206What?
A58206Whence have you either such knowledg or commission so to judg?
A58206Where can you shew us in terminis, Thou Thomas, John, Andrew,& c. shalt be baptized and saved?
A58206Whether a quality, action, or passion?
A58206Whether it be a figure or form?
A58206Whether it be an ens rationis, or a relatio realis?
A58206Whether the Sacraments of the old Testament made the like impress?
A58206Whether the subject thereof be the soul, or some active or passive faculty thereof?
A58206Who affirms that which you suppose?
A58206Why I write after so many, so much more able to defend the truth, might possibly put me to the Oratours quaere ● y What is left for me to do?
A58206Why did you not rather say that this device was P. Lombards( who mentioneth the Imputative faith you speak of) or some of the following Schoolmen?
A58206Why do ye deny them baptism?
A58206Why might you not say the same also concerning circumcision?
A58206Why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the DISCIPLES?
A58206Why trouble you your self with our stir to do that which Christ commandeth us?
A58206Would you have our fall in Adam, and repair in Christ run literally parallell, even to circumstances?
A58206You say more, To whom is the commandement given?
A58206and how can you who baptize discern this?
A58206and why not now?
A58206and why not so in believing and repenting, seeing that God requireth impossibilities neither in things temporal nor spiritual?
A58206and why seek ye further, omitting the type of Circumcision?
A58206are children in their nonage excluded from the blessing in Christ?
A58206because God hath as great a care of them as of others, therefore we must have no care of them in the application of the ordinary means?
A58206because it doth not in every place of Scripture signify infants, therefore doth it not any where, no not where infants are spoken of?
A58206because those of years professed their faith, and confessed their sins?
A58206but what evidence can there be in those things, whose authority can not be proved, and whose truth can not be infallible?
A58206but you say, this pertains to children when they are capable, but made with them assoon as they are alive( that is in the mothers womb) what this?
A58206can the holy Ghost be inactive, and without effectuall influence in any soul?
A58206de necessitate medii, in respect of infants salvation, as if they could not be saved without it?
A58206deale ingenuously then; do you affime that by whole, or all, the Scripture doth alwayes meane, persons of reason and age?
A58206doe you affirme that by whole families, is ever meant all persons of age within the family, and such only?
A58206doth the incapacity in respect of one command, conclude an incapacity of all?
A58206hath a stone or tree any habitual faith, or reason, or any capacity of the holy Ghost, illumination, or sanctification?
A58206how could infants receive circumcision, who could do as little duty as infants now can?
A58206hum,& quid est aquae nisi aqua?
A58206if evill or unjust, why consult you how to imitate it by way of revenge?
A58206if of children, what can they, as such, perform?
A58206is it not a shame to be such, as we are or may well be ashamed to be called?
A58206is not this froathy- Rethorick?
A58206is your meaning, Some of them that are capable of the same grace, are not alwaies capable of the signe thereof?
A58206might he not be sealed or saved?
A58206must all the world be drown''d, and only eight persons saved?
A58206nay, but no man can be edified by that which is destructive; or in Enthusiasms and Revelations?
A58206or a Boyish manner of contest, to call Whore, and all ill names, where they have not other power to prevail?
A58206or because they have not faith, do you conclude them all damned who die in their infancy?
A58206or deny it to any within the Church, needing Regeneration, that they may be saved?
A58206or did he at first make any more then one husband and one wife?
A58206or did not Tertullian know what he wrote?
A58206or doe you not take a child of eight dayes old( when it was by Gods command and covenant to receive the seal) to be an infant?
A58206or what wil it advantage you if it were true?
A58206say you, how can he be passive who can not be active at all?
A58206so hath he a care for their bodily preservation and sustenance; doth that prove that we ought not to feed or cloath them?
A58206that is, did he make any more wives for Adam then one?
A58206the Apostle saith, much every way: and what is the advantage of the believing Christians child, and Gods covenant with them?
A58206the seal of circumcision?
A58206therefore Infants who can not so do, may not be baptized?
A58206they only who can actually for the present repent?
A58206this covenant?
A58206to whom?
A58206were it not rather to tempt God, if( as much as in us lies) we should shut up the doore and inlet into his kingdome against infants?
A58206were the infants excepted?
A58206were they no wayes liable to this double precept, repent and be baptized every one of you?
A58206what are they damn''d?
A58206what doth God, when he said to Abraham — and in thee all the families of the earth shall be blessed; doth he meane only all persons of age?
A58206what in Traditions and unwritten verities?
A58206what, is it of force only to men and women of yeares; where''s the infants part?
A58206what, no more then of Turkes, and Jewes?
A58206what, to those who had been children, but were now of years to be taught, believe and repent?
A58206when?
A58206where have they any express precept for dipping over head and ears?
A58206where have they any express precept for their long prayers, for baptizing women, or administring the communion to them?
A58206where is any precept obliging to a place?
A58206where is his priviledge of federall holynesse, as being borne of believing parents?
A58206where is there any syllable express, or probable for re- baptizing any?
A58206where shall we feek these, among our adversaries?
A58206wherein appears either matter or form thereto pertinent?
A58206which of all the reformed Churches ever did so?
A58206who know''s not, that God commanded severall things with respect to severall capacities?
A58206who knows not that these and the like things are left under the general rule, Let all things be done decently, and in order?
A58206who?
A58206you confesse baptisme to be the ordinary inlet into the kingdome of heaven; and is an ordinary thing a signe or miracle?
A58206— Why were it not as good they stayed to make it, till that time, before which time if they do make it, it is to no purpose?
A58206— Would it not as well follow à non scripto?
A58206〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 At ver ● num á nostris operibus pende ● sa ● ● is nestra?
A502482, 3, 4. and what was this denying the Power of Godliness that is charged upon them?
A502482.15, 16. and shall we say, that notwithstanding all this, they were received into compleat and immediate membership by their personal faith,& c?
A50248224, 225?
A5024826. was entring into a new Membership?
A502483. could answer all that is said in this Proposition?
A502484 of being ● e ● alone in their wickedness?
A5024849 why may not the like be said of those who are onely Baptized in voto?
A5024852. why should it be thought a dangerous matter to agree thereunto for the Substance thereof?
A5024859?
A502487 — 10. doth not that import an injunction to the Churches unto which they did belong, to Excommunicate them, if they had not already done it?
A50248A Parents Faith, Prayers, and Covenant may live, though hi ● self be dead: But how?
A50248A meer contrary Affirmation, how can it go for a sufficient Confutation?
A50248Adam was a Member of fallen Mankinde, and so are we, though he came to be so by his own personal act, and we by him, or by his act for us?
A50248Againe, how came Esau to lose his Membership?
A50248And Cartwright to ● ● at Question, What are the Duties of the rest of the Church that are pres ● nt at a C ● i ● des Baptisme?
A50248And do we not then express this, that the Parent whose Child ● is to be Baptized must be a Confederate visible Believer?
A50248And doth not this Neglect make way for I ● religion and Apostacy in Churches, no Church- way being used toward these for prevent ● ng thereof?
A50248And doth not this sufficiently imply, That children in those Churches, when adult, were under Discipline in those Churches?
A50248And for ability to examine themselves, can not this be wanting ▪ but the want of the being of faith must be inferred thence?
A50248And how came the Children of Abraham by Keturah to lose their Membership?
A50248And how can the Doctrine in hand have any such natural tendency?
A50248And if their communion with the Church did not cease, but continue, how can it be avoided but they were under Church- discipline?
A50248And if this be true, is it not then true, that if the Parents continue in the Covenant, the Seed of such Parents are also part of the Church?
A50248And in another place( b) unto this Question, To whom is the Lords Supper to be given?
A50248And indeed how can it?
A50248And indeed, how can it be otherwise?
A50248And indeed, how can that be taken for an Ordinance of Christ, which is not according to Scripture?
A50248And is not the Arguing of the Reverend Author much like it?
A50248And is there no danger of Corruption by Over- straitning the Subject of Baptism?
A50248And we di ● ● ered about this, Who are visible Believers?
A50248And what shall become of Children when their Parents are dead( as how many F ● therle ● s and Motherless Children are amo ● g us?)
A50248And when the Apostle bids Timothy, turn away from such; doth not this simply that they were Scandalous persons, and apparently wicked?
A50248And who ever made a specifical distinction of that, so as to say( in that sense) some are Mediate Subjects, and some Immediate?
A50248And why not?
A50248And why will not this follow?
A50248Are all the adult persons, whom they admit into Membership, such as the Proposition describes?
A50248Are not we as truely, personally, and immediately Members of the Body of fallen Mankinde, as Adam was?
A50248Besides, how shall we know a thing to be an Ordinance of Christ, if it be not according to the Scripture?
A50248But as mediate as their Member ● ● ip is, here is somewhat added, that shall touch these adult Children themselves; and what is that?
A50248But can we not deal with Arguments, without being supposed to reflect upon the Persons each of other?
A50248But did either of them ple ● d for greater strictness then the Synod doth?
A50248But for the other, of being Immediate Members, why doth not this follow from their being partakers of the Covenant, the formalis ratio of Membership?
A50248But how do they agree therein, if for all this in graffing there be something between the stock and them?
A50248But how shall they be reconciled, if the latter, as well as the former, be meant of the Church- visible?
A50248But if this denial do deny them to have any part in the Lord, and so make them cease from fea ● ing the Lord, how can it be but as is said?
A50248But is there any Proof of the contrary to what the Synod affirmeth?
A50248But is this certain, that a different way of covenanting, makes a different kinde of membership?
A50248But is this certain, that neither Rule in Scripture, nor good Reason, will give warrant for such charity as is mentioned?
A50248But is this certain, that the Parents in question are visibly breakers of the covenant?
A50248But is this which is here affirmed certain and clear, that want of the ability and exercise spoken of, doth argue want of the very being of Faith?
A50248But shall we therefore deny or scruple their Admission thereunto?
A50248But then how can this stand which is there said, that such persons are not under the Watch, Discipline and Government of the Church?
A50248But to that Question, Would you admit all sorts to the Lor ● s Supper?
A50248But what is all this to the Children of our Churches?
A50248But what is all this to the matter in hand?
A50248But what is there in this to overthrow the Synods Assertion?
A50248But what weight is there in this, to weaken the Synods Argument?
A50248But where is there any thing to shew that the administration of Baptism, pointed to by the Synod, is undue?
A50248But why do not the things mentioned avail to put the Parent into Church- fellowship?
A50248But why doth not this Reason and Text prove the thing intended by the Synod?
A50248But why doth this Text speak nothing for the advantage of the Synod?
A50248But why should we use personal membership in so improper a sence, or insist on a sence that toucheth not the cause in question?
A50248But why then is this Proposition stuck at?
A50248But will any say, that to be a childe of a Church- member is no priviledge at all to a childe, but onely to the Father?
A50248By the Covenant God gives himself to be a God to his People, and to their seed in their generations, Gen. 17. and shall we say this is nothing?
A50248Calvin in his Geneva- cate ● hism, to that Question, Whether Pasters may give the Sacraments to all?
A50248Can distracted persons do so?
A50248Can persons be truly called Holy, as in the Text alledged, or an Holy seed, as Ezra 9. and yet not be Members of the visible Church?
A50248Can there be such Vigilancy, Care and Endeavours towards such as are no ● under the watch of the Church at all?
A50248Can they be Israelites, and not Israel, in the same respect?
A50248Do ye not judge them that are within?
A50248Doth he deny that it is want of opportunity that hinders the Parents from doing what is required in the fifth Proposition?
A50248Doth it not plainly appear thereby, that a different way and means of being in Covenant, doth not make a different sort of Membership?
A50248For what hath the Church to do to judge men without?
A50248For what is more easie then for an offender to forsake the Assembly, to separate himself,& c?
A50248For, can we think that those Churches had no Church- discipline in them?
A50248For, doth not the Vigilancy of Church- Elders, import some kinde of Church- watchfulness?
A50248For, is any Parent such a procreant cause of his childs Being by gen ● raci ● n, as not to be instrumental under God therein?
A50248God is Almighty, and All- sufficient, and is it nothing to have such a God to be a God to us, and to our seed?
A50248Here we see are various wayes of covenanting; but shall we say that these do infer divers kinds of membership?
A50248How can a Separation be properly pertinacious and incurable, or appear so to be, till the means of Church discipline have been used?
A50248How strangely is this misapplied to the matter in hand( b)?
A50248How then is it here said, that the Synod would not let this which themselves acknowledged, be expressed, though our Vnity lay at the stake for it?
A50248How then?
A50248If In, why is Baptism denied to their Children?
A50248If Out, how co ● e they so to be?
A50248If he be without, why should you disown him, any more then you do Non- members, or such as were never joyned to the Church?
A50248If it be said, that the baptizing of these in question hardens the Parent?
A50248If it may not be granted that they continue Members, why should not something be produced to prove the contrary?
A50248If some Authors have so distinguished Members, yet where is such a distinction of Membership?
A50248If the meaning onely be that Infants do not enter into Covenant by an act of their own proper persons; who ever said or thought they did?
A50248If the persons described in the Proposition be said to be broken off, what is this l ● ss then the thing that is so disowned?
A50248If then the union of Members with the Church be ● ● graffing, how can it be avoided but it must be immediate, and so they be immediate Members?
A50248If therefore the children spoken of be in the Covenant, how can the deniall of Baptism to them be any other then is said?
A50248If therefore there were these three differences, and as many more, between the cases alledged, yet where is there any difference in the main point?
A50248If they be breakers of it, then sure they are comprehended in it: for, how can men break the Covenant, wh ● ch they are not in?
A50248If this will not suffice, but there must be some other qualifications besides, and superadded unto this, what shall become of them?
A50248Is Regular Communion so good and excellent, and can it be hurtful for Churches to agree and consent to Practise it?
A50248Is it an act of covenanting, which is the instrumental means?
A50248Is it come to this, that Children are not Members of any Instituted Church?
A50248Is it covenan ●-interest, which is the formalis ratio of membership?
A50248Is it divine gran ●, and institution, which is the principal efficient?
A50248Is it not a main point in ingraffing, that the union between the branch and the stock be immediate, and that nothing lye between them?
A50248Is not here plain suitableness in the Similitude?
A50248Is not this a rendring of them, in respect of their children, in a worse condition then formerly?
A50248Is their giving up themselves and ● h ● ● r children to the Lord, a cause to cut off their children from having any part in the Lord?
A50248Is there no danger of putting those: out of the visible Church, whom Christ would have kept in?
A50248May there not be the being and truth of that grace, even there where the exercise of it is much wanting?
A50248No we do not see that he denieth this at all?
A50248Now can the neglect of Church- watchfulness be a cause of this evil, if the Lord have not appointed them to be under the same?
A50248Now doth not this prove the thing intended?
A50248Now if they be breakers of it, is it not thereby clear that they are comprehended in it?
A50248Now we demand, how they can be admitted as Members ▪ who are already as compleat, and perfect Members as any in the Chur ● h?
A50248Now what saith the Reverend Author to these Proofs?
A50248Now what saith the Reverend Author to these?
A50248Now what saith the Reverend Author to this in his Reply?
A50248Now what saith the Reverend Author to this?
A50248Now what saith the Reverend Author to this?
A50248Now what saith the Reverend Author unto this?
A50248Now what saith the Reverend Author unto this?
A50248Psal 50 16. but doth the Lord say this to such as were qualified as in this fifth Proposition?
A50248That Interest in the Covenant is the main ground of title to Baptism?
A50248That more then membership is also requisite to the receiving of the Lords Supper?
A50248That when they are grown up, they are not under the watch, discipline and government of the Church?
A50248The Lord knows how many may from outward Membership in the visible Church, drop to Hell; and does not their Death put an end to their Membership?
A50248The Synod, to shew that Children are actual, complea ●, and immediate members, asketh, what do they want hereunto?
A50248The words of the Text are express and plain, What have I to do to judge them also that are without?
A50248To some indeed the Lord saith, What hast thou to do to take my covenant in thy mo ● th?
A50248To use it, being not so qualified visibly, is it not a treacherous usurping of the Great Seal of the King of Heaven and Earth?
A50248VVhat if all this were granted?
A50248W ● at is t ● is Disow ● ing?
A50248We demand, whether this Disowning be not a putting one out of the Church, that was before in it?
A50248We demand, whether this does not fully yield the Cause, and give us as much as we need to the matter in hand?
A50248We have known an Antipoedebaptist flie to this as his Sheat- Anchor[ Infants are Members; ● ut how?
A50248We might also ask whether such a member of reasoning as is here used would prove Women to be no Members of an Instituted Church?
A50248Wh ● t state of fitness was the unclean Iewish Parent in, but onely a state of membership?
A50248What proof is there, that except this be done, there can be no ground for the charitable judgement that is mentioned?
A50248What shall be said then of little children?
A50248What then doth the Reverend Author here say?
A50248What though the voluntary Combination, mentioned by by Mr. Rutherfurd, in his sense doth inferre a Classical Membership and Iurisdiction?
A50248What though there be no mention of Church- censure in the Texts alledged?
A50248Who ever said that any were broken off for growing up to adult age?
A50248Why doth it not follow, that if God did establish the Church of the Iews by a progress of the Covenant, that therefore he doth so now?
A50248Why should such a thing be barely affirmed, and not proved?
A50248and if his deni ● l do cause that they have no part in the Lord, doth it not also cause their Irreligion and ● postacy?
A50248and if so, what should hinder but that Children, when grown up, may as well be under Church- discipline now, as under the Old Testament?
A50248and is not that all one, as to have true Faith in the judgement o ● Charity?
A50248and is not their subjection to Church- discipline, when adult, in the new Testament, rightly inferred from the like subjection in the Old?
A50248and is there not the like reason of other punishments, whether Ecclesiastical or Civil?
A50248and might they be then under Church- discipline, and yet now not so, because here there is not par ratio?
A50248and the want of children even in married persons to be by Gods restraining hand, and sh ● tting up the W ● ● b?
A50248and what could all their Profession, and Faith, and Actings do, if God did not vouchsafe to take them into Covenant?
A50248and where shall we have Scripture- warrant for such a Church- disowning as is not Excommuni ● ation?
A50248are they In the Church, or Out?
A50248are they Members of the Catholick visible Church?
A50248be a sufficient proof thereof?
A50248can men be faulty for not performing Covenant- engagements, when they are not comprehended in the Covenant?
A50248can men cease from fearing the Lord, and from having any par ● in h ● ●, and yet this not tend to Apostacy and Irreligion?
A50248can one be bound by that which is not in being?
A50248do they take a right course to know they are such?
A50248doth not this plainly shew, that Parents are but Instrumental under God in the begetting of Children?
A50248for if it was so with the Jews children, is it not also so with ours, according to the Synods arguing?
A50248for, may they be now Baptized in their infancy, as then they were Circumcised, because there is in both par ratio?
A50248how much more those who never had such membership?
A50248i. e. Virtually, in the virtue and effect of them: And how is that?
A50248i. e. What have they more then this, that they are regularly( by the Rules of Gods Word, and his Institution therein) within the visible Church?
A50248if not, is it not a vain thing?
A50248must we binde the Holy- Ghost to mention all Truths and Rules together in one Text or Context?
A50248no, not in the least degree?
A50248or are they no Members at all?
A50248or are they such breakers of it, who if they have not publickly acted as aforesaid, the reason hath been, because they have been inevitably hindred?
A50248or farre removed, and when Children are sui juris, and not under the wings of their Parents?
A50248or how can it be denied, but that this ariseth from their different qualifications?
A50248or that it is an undue Administration of B ● ptism to extend it further then the Lords Supper?
A50248or that the Members of them were not under that Discipline?
A50248or the children, when grown up, were not Members?
A50248or to administer Baptism to some unto whom we do not administer the Lords Supper?
A50248or to what purpose is that?
A50248shall they be Owned ▪ or Disowned?
A50248such as they are capable of, though not of all; and then why may not the like be yielded concerning the adult persons spoken of?
A50248that might help them toward Heaven?
A50248there being cause for it?
A50248to what purpose should this be?
A50248we suppose this can not be denied; and therefore if a progress of the Covenant did establish the Church then, why not so now?
A50248were they not Scandalous in life, but did give up themselves to the Lord, and subject themselves to the Government of Christ in his Church?
A50248what course do they take to know it?
A50248what need we labour in finding out distinctions to deny them that which no body ever challenged for them?
A50248what shall then become of Gods institution in this matter?
A50248when as the offence doth not cut off the Parents Membership, is there any reason it should cut off the Membership of the Childe?
A50248— And why may not the Church deny Baptism to any childe of a believing Parent?
A50248● ez ●, concerning the Question who are to be Baptized?
A58207* Corpus Christi naturale fuit veré sepultum; an putandum est nostra corpora eodom modo sepeliri in administratine baptismi?
A582071,& c. what, would you have your disciples baptized with the sprie of two neighboring seas, and a cloud of fresh water raining on their heads?
A582071. quis enim potest dare quod ipse non habeat?
A5820710. Who( of any sense) doth not understand that of those that can, and will not?
A5820714. pronounceth in the present) by a designation to the service of Iesus, Christ, and the future participation of the promises?
A5820721 ● saying all flesh dyed — every man — meane onely all of reason and age?
A5820721. of what?
A582073 20, 21. what, must the type and truth agree in all things?
A5820736: see here is water, what doth let me to be baptized?
A582074 When the Apostle saith the unbelieving husband is sanctified in the wife; if any ask, what wife?
A582075 If the matter must be put upon express words of Scripture, let our Antagonists shew us where they are expresly forbidden to baptize Infants?
A58207A gallant flourish indeed: but seriously; Did Christ take them up in his arms, and bless them; and are they not blessed?
A58207Again, Baptism is administred with the words of institution by Christ appointed; take away the Word, and what is the Water but ordinary water?
A58207All these vain and injurious expressions, are meer aspersions: and call you this an Argument considerable?
A58207And I pray how could the Priest under the Law know the minds of children to be circumci ● ed?
A58207And again, who is eaten with the zeal of Gods house?
A58207And if a quality, of what kind it is?
A58207And what solidity is there on these conjectures, to conclude that Hieroms parents, though Christian, defer''d his baptism until he was 30 years old?
A58207And where is then their answer of a good conscience toward God?
A58207And who is so ready to cast this odious Livery upon others, as the most Antichristian?
A58207And why can not God as well do his mercies to infants now immediatly, as he did before the institution either of circumcision or baptism?
A58207And why is it more proportionable to an act of reason and humanity to defer childrens baptism, then in due time to baptize them?
A58207But let us hear the rest of Tertullians advice; was it only concerning the deferring infants baptism?
A58207But to what purpose do you propose any of these examples to your clients imitation?
A58207But what follows?
A58207But what if they never marry, must they never be baptized?
A58207But what is crucifying again?
A58207But what makes this against baptizing infants of parents known to be within the Church?
A58207But what other battalio''s come next up?
A58207But you demand, if it implies a duty on our part, how then can children receive it, who can not do duty at all?
A58207But you say, Circumcision left a Character in the flesh, which being imprinted upon Infants, did it work upon them when they came to age?]
A58207But you say, — The infant is not capable of believing, and if he were, he were also capable of dissenting; and how then do they know his mind?]
A58207By demanding, quanta est major Propositio?
A58207Can any be saved without such grace?
A58207Can there be a sound conclusion from rotten premises?
A58207Can you be assured that none of these who are baptized in infancy, and no otherwise, are regenerate and saved?
A58207Could they if sent into Painim- Countreys with all the terms of your supposition, have been more disposed to an actual belief without a new Master?
A58207Did their Baptizers profane Baptism?
A58207Do any creatures under the degrees of man, bear the image of their Creator, in immortality, sanctity and light of understanding?
A58207Do they say so when they speak of infant- baptism?
A58207Do we then complain against God, when we complain of the Anabaptists abridging children of that which God hath allowed them?
A58207Do you account obedience to God and his holy ordinances, to be a tempting of God?
A58207Do you also call the truth thereof in question?
A58207Do you mean by the Holy Ghost, the gi ● ts and graces of Gods holy Spirit regenerating the elect to the Kingdome of Heaven?
A58207Do you think there is no danger from infants original guilt which maks them stand in need of the laver of regeneration for the remission of their sin?
A58207Doth God save any Infants?
A58207Doth it follow therefore a man may make confession of Christ with his mouth to salvation, before he believeth in him in his heart?
A58207Doth not Gods blessing give both end and means that we may be so?
A58207God created him — male and female created he them: both one flesh, and so but one — and wherefore one?
A58207God hath appointed baptism to be a seal and token of our receiving and entrance into the Church; is it to no purpose to obey him in his Ordinances?
A58207How can any meer man know whom to baptize, though of years, and whom to put by?
A58207How doth that appear?
A58207How invalid is the Moderators Agument, à non scripto, ad non factum?
A58207How know you that Iohn B. or the Apostles never baptized any Infants?
A58207How many impertinences are he ● e twisted up together?
A58207How many ridiculous consequences would you thence inferre?
A58207How much more rationally may ● e make covenant with infants, though yet without the actuall use of reason?
A58207How often hath Satan in tempting to sin, misled the incaucious with this suggestion, there can be no danger in it,''t is the surer way?
A58207How poor a spirited mother art thou, and of how little faith?
A58207How then shall we be renewed after our falling into sin?
A58207How vain and malitious is this calumny of yours?
A58207I appeal to your own conscience ▪ may we as well conclude against Gods word, as for it?
A58207I demand then, Do infants believe?
A58207I demand, Doth God perform every one of his promises?
A58207I demand, quo jure, by what right is the Kingdom of Heaven theirs?
A58207I wonder what they will be ashamed to say, who blush not at such assertions?
A58207I would gladly be resolved, quanta est illa propositio?
A58207I. Quid igitur?
A58207If any ask, why it comes out so late to publike view?
A58207If giving the Seal to those who can not be profited thereby, be profanation of the same, how often do you prophane the holy Seal?
A58207If it be a ceremony only, how doth it sanctifie us, or make the comers thereunto perfect?
A58207If it be a duty on our part to administer it, how can children receive it, who can not do any duty at all?
A58207If it be necessary to baptism that the baptizer know the mind of the person to be baptized, how can you baptize men of years?
A58207If it implys a duty on our part, how then can children receive it, who can not do duty a ● all?]
A58207If not, how maliciously is this objected against us, baptizing Infants of Believers, Christ himself expresly avowing them as subjects of his Kingdom?
A58207If not, why inferre you them?
A58207If this argument were good, how many men and women of age, must by the same reason be denyed baptism?
A58207If you do not, why do you urge against us an authority which your self consenteth not unto?
A58207If you mean the second, that is, that we less know the truth then the evidence; what blame you in our cause, or advantage your Clients?
A58207If you say we see no evidence, nor can the blind see the Sun; what can you gain hereby?
A58207If you will have none baptized before the works of the Spirit, before the operations of grace,& c. when and whom may you baptize?
A58207If( you say) by the external work alone, how doth this differ from the opus operatum of Papists, save that it is worse?
A58207In which it seemeth to us a very weak querie, And why can not God as well do his mercies to Infants now immediately?
A58207Is not the Scripture evident?
A58207Must this be by vertue of baptism by water onely, or the externall ministration thereof?
A58207Nay but tell me, if you can, by all your reason, how could infants receive baptism except we did administer it?
A58207No man rationally asketh, What need we two eyes who can see with one?
A58207Onely this( you say) that God hath as great a care of Infants, as of others,& c.] Here is another argument as feeble as the fore- going: What?
A58207Or spake Christ onely concerning the carnall seed of Abraham, and not of the spirituall when he said, Of such is the Kingdom of Heaven?
A58207Popery and Pelagianism twisted together?
A58207Possibly Ioash would here have replied to such a short Scheme of plea, — Will ye plead for Baal?
A58207Qui rebaptizatur, jam Christianus fuerat: quomodo dici potest iterum Christianus& c?
A58207Quis comeditur z ● ● ● ● mus Dei?
A58207Restore such a one — but how?
A58207Shall not they therefore that have the use of reason be baptized?
A58207Since faith is necessary to the susception of baptism,& c.] True in adultis; what is this to our present question concerning infants?
A58207So v. 1. the maimed or Eunuch shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord& c. what?
A58207So when the Prophet would recall the Jews from P ● lygamie to pure wedlock, he said, did not he( that is God the Creator) make one?
A58207Speak you this as a matter doubtfull?
A58207That is the act of understanding, ● aith and repentance?
A58207That would be a rare invention indeed: but if to call Anabaptists Anabaptists, be just, why find you fault with it?
A58207The old Academicks were wo nt to question the testimonie and evidence of their own senses with a quid si falleris?
A58207This weakly follows from unsound premises; was there no word added to Circumcision?
A58207This you will put upon necessary consequence, where you have no express word: And why shall we not have the like liberty for Infant- Baptism?
A58207This( say you) is the greatest vanity in the world] What vanity?
A58207To the Parents or to the children?
A58207To what children was that promise made?
A58207Was not the reason of the Covenant declared to Abraham?
A58207Was that faith which the Apostle commended onely there, or then when Hierom wrote in all the Western Church?
A58207Was there not a word of Institution?
A58207We know the word( children) importeth not alwayes infants; what then?
A58207Were it good Georgicks to say, Trouble not your self to fodder your cattle, or loose them from their stall that they may drink?
A58207What Word?
A58207What are these real services, and whose?
A58207What are we nearer heaven if we are baptized?]
A58207What did vidual continency, or conjugal fidelity concern infants, as such?
A58207What do you herein say which might not as well have been objected against the circumcision of infants?
A58207What must they be interessed onely when they come to that act of which by nature they have the faculty?
A58207What need all this stirre?
A58207What promise?
A58207What the Citie of Rome?
A58207What then?
A58207What think you of the validity of that Argument which is from Gods power to his will?
A58207What think you then of our Christian Sabbath?
A58207What was it which he called Peters Chair?
A58207What yoke?
A58207What, by descent from naturall parents?
A58207What; because''t is not written?
A58207What?
A58207What?
A58207Whence have you either such knowledg or commission so to judg?
A58207Where can you shew us in terminis, Thou Thomas, John, Andrew,& c. shalt be baptized and saved?
A58207Whether a quality, action, or passion?
A58207Whether it be a figure or form?
A58207Whether it be an ● ns rationis, or a relatio realis?
A58207Whether the Sacraments of the old Testament made the like impress?
A58207Whether the subject thereof be the soul, or some active or passive faculty thereof?
A58207Who affirms that which you suppose?
A58207Why I write after so many, so much more able to defend the truth, might possibly put me to the Oratours quaere y What is left for me to do?
A58207Why did you not rather say that this device was P. Lombards( who mentioneth the Imputative faith you speak of) or some of the following Schoolmen?
A58207Why do ye deny them baptism?
A58207Why might you not say the same also concerning circumcision?
A58207Why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the DISCIPLES?
A58207Why trouble you your self with our stir to do that which Christ commandeth us?
A58207Would you have our fall in Adam, and repair in Christ run literally parallell, even to circumstances?
A58207You say more, To whom is the commandement given?
A58207and how can you who baptize discern this?
A58207and why not now?
A58207and why not so in believing and repenting, seeing that God requireth impossibilities neither in things temporal nor spiritual?
A58207and why seek ye further, omitting the type of Circumcision?
A58207are children in their nonage excluded from the blessing in Christ?
A58207because God hath as great a care of them as of others, therefore we must have no care of them in the application of the ordinary means?
A58207because it doth not in every place of Scripture signify infants, therefore doth it not any where, no not where infants are spoken of?
A58207because those of years professed their faith, and confessed their sins?
A58207but what evidence can there be in those things, whose authority can not be proved, and whose truth can not be infallible?
A58207but you say, this pertains 〈 … 〉 when they are capable, but made with them assoon as they are alive( that is in the mothers womb) what this?
A58207can the holy Ghost be inactive, and without effectuall influence in any soul?
A58207de necessitate medii, in respect of infants salvation, as if they could not be saved without it?
A58207deale ingenuously then; do you affime that by whole, or all, the Scripture doth alwayes meane, persons of reason and age?
A58207doe you affirme that by whole families, is ever meant all persons of age within the family, and such only?
A58207doth the incapacity in respect of one command, conclude an incapacity of all?
A58207hath a stone or tree any habitual faith, or reason, or any capacity of the holy Ghost, illumination, or sanctification?
A58207how could infants receive circumcision, who could do as little duty as infants now can?
A58207if evill or unjust, why consult you how to imitate it by way of revenge?
A58207if of children, what can they, as such, perform?
A58207is it not a shame to be such, as we are or may well be ashamed to be called?
A58207is not this froathy- Rethorick?
A58207is your meaning, Some of them that are capable of the same grace, are not alwaies capable of the signe thereof?
A58207might he not be sealed or saved?
A58207must all the world be drown''d, and only eight persons saved?
A58207nay, but no man can be edified by that which is destructive; or in Enthusiasms and Revelations?
A58207operám ne perdemus?
A58207or a Boyish manner of contest, to call Whore, and all ill names, where they have not other power to prevail?
A58207or because they have not faith, do you conclude them all damned who die in their infancy?
A58207or deny it to any within the Church, needing Regeneration, that they may be saved?
A58207or did he at first make any more then one husband and one wife?
A58207or did not Tertullian know what he wrote?
A58207or doe you not take a child of eight dayes old( when it was by Gods command and covenant to receive the seal) to be an infant?
A58207or what wil it advantage you if it were true?
A58207say you, how can he be passive who can not be active at all?
A58207so hath he a care for their bodily preservation and ● ustenance; doth that prove that we ought not to feed or cloath them?
A58207that is, did he make any more wives for Adam then one?
A58207the Apostle saith, much every way: and what is the advantage of the believing Christians child, and Gods covenant with them?
A58207the seal of circumcision?
A58207therefore Infants who can not so do, may not be baptized?
A58207they only who can actually for the present repent?
A58207this covenant?
A58207to whom?
A58207were it not rather to tempt God, if( as much as in us lies) we should shut up the doore and inlet into his kingdome against infants?
A58207were the infants excepted?
A58207were they no wayes liable to this double precept, repent and be baptized every one of you?
A58207what are they damn''d?
A58207what doth God, when he said to Abraham — and in thee all the families of the earth shall be blessed; doth he meane only all persons of age?
A58207what in Traditions and unwritten verities?
A58207what, is it of force only to men and women of yeares; where''s the infants part?
A58207what, no more then of Turkes, and Iewes?
A58207what, to those who had been children, but were now of years to be taught, believe and repent?
A58207when?
A58207where have they any express precept for dipping over head and ears?
A58207where have they any express precept for their long prayers, for baptizing women, or administring the communion to them?
A58207where is any precept obliging to a place?
A58207where is his priviledge of federall holynesse, as being borne of believing parents?
A58207where is there any syllable express, or probable for re- baptizing any?
A58207where shall we seek these, among our adversaries?
A58207wherein appears either matter or form thereto pertinent?
A58207which of all the reformed Churches ever did so?
A58207who know''s not, that God commanded severall things with respect to severall capacities?
A58207who knows not that these and the like things are left under the general rule, Let all things be done decently, and in order?
A58207who?
A58207— Auxentius solvit baptismum Christi — curigitur rebaptizan ● dos Auxentius fideles populos putat baptizatos in nomine Trinitatis,& c?
A58207— Why were it not as good they stayed to make it, till that time, before which time if they do make it, it is to no purpose?
A58207— Would it not as well follow à non scripto?
A26886& unde il ● e colitur, nisi Charitate?
A26886( That is, both profess it at present, and engage to continue in it; answering the interrogation Credis?
A26886) But was the word[ entitled] in your Argument?
A2688617, 9, 10. is concerning others,[ who can know it?]
A268862 Quest ▪ What must we take for a violent presumption, of the unsoundness of his claim?
A268862. and 3. were such or not?
A268862. he saith,[ Vt agamus de forma Ecclesiae, ubi potius essentialis ejus forma posita est, quàm in fide Christi interna?
A268862d Question is, what is the Common effect of Baptism on all that Receive it?
A268864, 5 Whether Profession be required for it self, or as a sign of the thing professed?
A268864. doth purposely dispute it, Vtrùm peccatores sint Baptizandi?
A268865. that such was their judgement, when they express no such thing?
A268866.17, 18 For what communion hath Light with darkness, and Christ with Belial, or a Believer with an Infidel?
A268866.33& c.[ How shall we that are dead to sin live any longer therein?
A26886A Professor of what?
A26886Abrenuncio: Spondes?
A26886Again tell me, what a man should do to be of every learned good mans minde, or to escape their censures?
A26886All the doubt is, Whether they also ascribe Regenerating, Renewing Grace to all the rightly baptized?
A26886Also it is one thing to ask, Whether men have right to performance of their own part in Baptism, in part?
A26886An Equivocal faith is a Real faith; why then may it not cast out a Real Devil( that is, be a Causa sine qua non?
A26886An ● raeter electos vocatos etiam Reprobi, Infideles, sive occulti sive manifesti peccatores, verae Christi Ecclesiae membra sint?
A26886And I crave their patient sober enquiry, Whether that be not to make another species of Baptism and of visible Christianity?
A26886And Pag 268. he gives the like answer to the Question, Quid est credere in Jesum Cristum, qui ascendit in coelum?]
A26886And another question, whether they have Right to Both these?
A26886And another, Whether they have right to Gods part?
A26886And are not all the Philosophers that ever defined punishment,( so far as I know) agreed in it?
A26886And are not these more then unus Baxterus?
A26886And before they actually baptized them, they asked them whether they believed in God the Father, Son and Holy Ghost?
A26886And did you not set these words before your Readers eyes?
A26886And do you not fear to make these the Grounds of[ a charge?]
A26886And doth not that man shew his heart unfound, that can believe the next moment, and will not do it at the present?
A26886And he comes to the objection, How all that are baptized can be said to put on Christ, when Baptism is not effectual with all?
A26886And how have Gods servant in all ages of the Church to this day received comfort in such mixt Communion?
A26886And how many thousand souls may perish everlastingly?
A26886And if I be mistaken, why should he be so angry at it?
A26886And if they know not the essentials, may we not help them to a tolerable knowledge of them at the present, before we part with them?
A26886And if we may not Initiate such a one, how shall we bring him to the Lords Table?
A26886And if we may not initiate such a one, how shall we bring him to the Lords Table?]
A26886And if you prove it, I may the next time I see you demand all your Estate and Learning; and what will you do then?
A26886And is it certain, that Dr Molin knows the mind of Dallaeus better then he doth his own, or is sooner then himself to be believed in the report of it?
A26886And is it not a kind of impossibility for any unregenerate man, rationally and soberly to promise to be regenerate the next minute or instant?
A26886And is there any which is not de futuro?
A26886And might I not well say desideratur conclusio?
A26886And must all omit this that have no assurance or subjective Certainty?
A26886And must we not dispute against that also which is indirectly asserted?
A26886And should I be so unmerciful now as to confute this man, if I could do it?
A26886And should that which makes them the greater sinners, give them right of admittance into the Church?
A26886And so I confidently say still: And what''s this to your Cause at all?
A26886And so whether it be a mutual Covenant; and both parties be actually obliged?
A26886And then what certainty have we that any of our Ances ● ors had a true Dogmatical faith?
A26886And therefore we do not, nor must not ask them in Sacramental Administrations, whether they have saving faith by meer name, without description?
A26886And this would put us hard to the enquiry, Which is the Church that hath this Infallibility?
A26886And what Saints were they?
A26886And what a Church?
A26886And what have I said against this?
A26886And what is it that is denyed unanimously by other Congregations?
A26886And what is that but sincerely to obey?
A26886And what is that equally Coram Deo& Exclesiâ?
A26886And what is there now on the other side to move us to think it probable that Iudas did Receive the Sacrament?
A26886And what is this more then the wooden leg, or silver teeth, which our Divines compare them to?
A26886And what saith Peter less, when he saith,[ Baptism saveth us] and thus expoundeth himself when he hath done?
A26886And what say the Fathers more?
A26886And what should one say to such a man as this?
A26886And what would Mr. Blake do with him if he say neither Yea, nor Nay?
A26886And what''s the reason?
A26886And what''s this to Mr. Blake''s new visible members that profess only some other kind of faith?
A26886And what''s this to the advantage of Mr. Blake''s Cause?
A26886And when shall we see the Donation that conveyed this Title to him?
A26886And why so?
A26886And would you have separated from all the Churches in the world?
A26886And yet he questioned with men in humane Language; he asketh some whether they believed, and Peter, whether he loved him?
A26886And yet what thoughts will you entertain of the Scripture?
A26886And yet will you in the next words perswade him that I talk of a faith short of justifying?
A26886Another, whether it be so necessary, that they ought not to come nor we to admit them without it?
A26886Are you resolved never to baptize more on the grounds that the Church of Christ hath alwayes baptized on?
A26886At least, few of them know that they do it sincerely( as themselves will here confess;) what then must these do in such a case?
A26886Because he named me not?
A26886But do you indeed think that all Equivocal terms are Culpable?
A26886But do you not contradict this, when you add[ yet if such Resolutions do not appear& c.] What if they appear not?
A26886But how prove you that the external Ordinance is a Nullity where there was no Title?
A26886But how should he be moved to consent by receiving it, and so signa ● ly Professing to consent when he doth not?
A26886But if they faithfully do their own part, how should the sins of others ● e their burden, unless by way of common compassion?
A26886But is it a likely thing that the Fathers and Catholick Church should be so blind as to take all for truly justified and regenerate that are baptized?
A26886But is this to say, They are vindictive, satisfactory to Justice, or more than chastisements?
A26886But it is much more disputable according to his principles, whether all that he should so Baptize, must not be rebaptized?
A26886But our Question is, Whether they they did not profess a saving faith?
A26886But our Question is, what the Circumciser must look for?
A26886But stay Brethren; do you build the Churches Peace on such terms as these?
A26886But tell me where any man was ever said in scripture to be united to Christ without saving faith, or the Profession of it?
A26886But that can not import a sincere Covenanting in saving Faith; For then how great a part of the people must be cut off?
A26886But the Question is, What they professed?
A26886But these will not serve his turn, but he must moreover have a third sort, even such as only Profess another faith short of Justifying?
A26886But to what, if not to have Christ as he is offered, who can tell?
A26886But what Saints?
A26886But what if he resolve not to continue it?
A26886But what if the Word had not truly converted them?
A26886But what if they deride and persecute Godliness it self, or a man because he is Godly?
A26886But what if they had or did say so?
A26886But what if they live many years in Sweating, or the like sin, is not that a certain sign of Ungodliness?
A26886But what is all this to a Saint- ship consisting in the Profession of a faith short of that which is Justifying?
A26886But what is that we may take for a sufficient reason of a mans claim?
A26886But what need we make any further enquiry, or dispute against a man that professedly yields the cause?
A26886But what shall I give you to make Mr. Blake of your opinion?
A26886But what shall we do for a Judge or Rule for the determining of our Controversie?
A26886But what then?
A26886But what''s that to the conveying of Right?
A26886But when I interpret this promise to be[ that he will so believe de futuro] he asketh me[ how comes de futuro in?]
A26886But where the contradictions?
A26886But where?
A26886But who are they?
A26886But with what comfort can the Godly have communion with the societies that are so mixt with multitudes of the ungodly?
A26886But you will perhaps say, what faith is that?
A26886But( I know some dissenting Brethren will say) what a Labyrinth do you bring the Church into on your grounds?
A26886Can Mr. Blake shew a Covenant of God ex parte sui distinct from this Promise?
A26886Can any man forbid water that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
A26886Can any man have a fundamentall Righ ●, that denyeth any Fundamental Truth?
A26886Can you so lament the estate of the less miserable, and not of the more miserable?
A26886Dare you hold communion with no Church that hath some members that in your own Judgement are unfit to be there?
A26886Did I there once mention such a faith?
A26886Did ever I say that[ such] a faith gives evidence?
A26886Did he expect an answer from men, for the bare words sake?
A26886Did he oblige them to a true answer, or to a false?
A26886Did you think men would take no heed what they read?
A26886Do any Divines deny to question it?
A26886Do not those persons profess a Justifying faith?
A26886Do our Brethrens Grounds afford us any better footing?
A26886Do you call for proof?
A26886Do you put the wrong end forward, and indeed mean[ a profession of faith[ or] a faith conjunct with a profession]?
A26886Doth Gods Covenant give it them, and yet is there no Promise of it to such as they?
A26886Doth all Passive or Objective power, Natural, Violent or Neutral, come into act?
A26886Doth he make a justifying and a Dogmatical faith all one?
A26886Doth he promise that he doth at the present so believe?
A26886Doth not God call them his servants himself?
A26886Doth not Paul in all his Epistles speak of the Saints, as converted savingly by the word of the Gospel?
A26886Doth not Scripture expresly affirm it?
A26886Doth not this man think himself very wise in his zeal?
A26886For if Gods Law had been fulfilled, the parents had been put to death,( we speak of both parents) and then how could they have had a child?
A26886For what is that but to choose Christ for salvation?
A26886For what is that but to follow the rules of Christ and Scripture?
A26886For what man is so prone to scruple or question his own Right or his childrens, as another may be?
A26886For what profit can it be to any man to be convinced at so dear a rate, how much Mr. Blake hath miscaried in his arguing?
A26886For where can we expect to find it, if not here?
A26886For where would you find a Church( among us) where there be not many that have not a Dogmatical faith, which you say must give them Title to Baptism?
A26886For will he profess it to be true, when he takes it not to be true?
A26886Fourthly, Do you give us any reason to believe that a notorious ungodly person in your Church is in any better a state than an Infidel?
A26886God saith, Friend, how camest thou in hither not having on a Wedding garment?
A26886Hath such an assertion bin usually heard among the worshippers of the Creator& the admirers of his works?
A26886Have you to do with any man that denyeth it?
A26886He will think this is great confidence; but what Remedy?
A26886How are those born within the Church, whose Parents are no Members of the Church?
A26886How comes I pray you that future in?
A26886How contrary is this new Doctrine to the Word, and all the ancient Churches, and all approved Protestants Judgements?
A26886How few will take well a Reproof, but rather defend their sin?
A26886How knows he it, but on the word of his Master that tells him so?
A26886How oft hath this opinion been confuted in the Separatists?
A26886How prove you that therefore they should be admitted to receive?
A26886How will you difference between Truth and a lye?
A26886I ask''t whether Preachers be not bound to endeavour the saving conversion of whole Nations?
A26886I conclude my sentence in his following words;[ Quid ergò agendum est?
A26886I hope you will not: And how should it speak otherwise to mans understanding?
A26886I know my censures of his labors are like to be provoking: But who can help that?
A26886I know this is like to displease: But what remedy?
A26886I shall enqure further, Whether this be so or not?
A26886If I be asked, what I mean by a serious Profession?
A26886If any say so to me, I will hold my hand from baptizing one minute, and ask him whether now he be willing?
A26886If any, what is it?
A26886If every man that did ought presumptuously might be cut off from the Church, why not from the Living?
A26886If he ask, Why then did I there mention his name?
A26886If he be not worthy that he keepeth not this sign, what is written?
A26886If he yield that charity is to hope the best, Why not then to be put to it?
A26886If only words, than what if a man worship actively the Sun or Moon, while verbally he makes the Christian profession?
A26886If the Pastor be thus Judge, how can you say as before, That the Notoriously Ungodly are ipso Jure Excommunicated?
A26886If they lose by it no more then I, what cause have I to care?
A26886If you ask them,[ Are you heartily willing to have Christ to save you both from the guilt and reign of sin, and to glorifie you?]
A26886If you do, then what profession is it, and of what faith?
A26886If you were to baptize an Aged man, that comes new into Christianity would not you be the judges whether his profession seemed serious or not?
A26886In the highest matters about the Attributes and Works of God, how common are Equivocal terms?
A26886Is here one word of answer to any real part of the Argument?
A26886Is his word to be taken?
A26886Is it credible that all Israel must be forced to profess themselves true believers, when many were not?
A26886Is it not a wonder how the Major could be denied?
A26886Is it not bad enough if he will not resolve to leave it?
A26886Is it not our duty to refuse the children of more than the Notoriously Vngodly?
A26886Is it not put to it, when it must hope the best?
A26886Is it unlawfull to say[ Lord I believe] as long as we have any Vnbelief to be removed?
A26886Is not Mr. Blake able to distinguish, between an Hypocrite and a Professor of another sort of faith?
A26886Is not Repentance ever concomitant with Faith?
A26886Is not such dealing a sufficient prohibition to dispute?
A26886Is the Church the outward fulness of Christ, considered as Head?
A26886Is there a Divine on earth that will deny that there are Equivocal terms in Scripture?
A26886Is there no Reality in a picture or a corps?
A26886Is there the vilest Murtherer, or Adulterer, that is not purposed to leave it before he dies?
A26886Is this the same with yours, or as large?
A26886It is a great doubt whether there be any power, properly Decisive- judicial in the Church- Guides or not?
A26886It is one thing to ask, whether the profession of justifying Faith be a duty to all that come to be Baptized?
A26886It therefore excludeth expresly all other wayes of interest in the Covenant by Birth- Priviledge: Else how could that Negative be true?
A26886Its one thing to ask, Who may demand it and come there?
A26886Judge then whether the profession of this, be not the profession of saving faith?
A26886Know ye not that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ, were baptized into his death?
A26886Know ye not that to whom ye yield your selves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey?
A26886Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ, were baptized into his death?
A26886Let them answer this for themselves, and they shall answer for us?
A26886May we not be certain that he is graceless or ungodly, that is a frequent Swearer?
A26886May we not take a man for Notoriously Ungodly, that hath been oft drunk, or oft committed fornication?
A26886Moreover, how much doth all History depend upon the word of of man?
A26886Mr. Corbet( cited by you) might well say, that primarily the Sacrament is Gods Seal; but did he say that it is only his, and not secondarily ours?
A26886Must Logick do the deed at last?
A26886Must men endeavour to convert a whole Nation, or not?
A26886Must we write confutations of such men as these?
A26886Nam de illis quoque ignoramus sictè neone accedant, an verè credant; an sint filii Praedestinationis, an Perditionis?
A26886Nay how many that did not provoke and harden them?
A26886Nay, is it not manifested that Dr Twiss himself hath frequently written for it?
A26886Nay, that they are not in a state much worse?
A26886Neque audiendi sunt qui hac de re movent scrupulum, ac dicunt, Quid si Minister fallatur?
A26886Non concludit quod est in Questione, quia Questio est, An sunt ex Ecclesia, seu membra Ecclesiae; non An in Ecclesia Visibili?
A26886Nor is God actually obliged to give them the blessings of the Covenant?
A26886Nor yet is it any of our Question, whether the Action of Receiving be commanded to any that are unregenerate, and so be his Duty?
A26886Note that the stress of the Controversie is not[ Whether it belong to them at all?]
A26886Now I would know of Mr. Blake, Whether all the Children of these Parents must be Baptized again, or not?
A26886Now what will you do with all these?
A26886Now which of these is it that Master Blake here meaneth?
A26886Or do you think that the covetous dissemblers had coram donatore a just claim, supposing him to be able to discern their deceit?
A26886Or is here such a Grievous inconvenience as you imagined?
A26886Or is it Infallible symptoms of the contrary which you mean, or which are sufficient to nullifie or invalidate that Profession?
A26886Or is not this a contradiction?
A26886Or to teach me how I may please you both, with the rest of the offended?
A26886Or what was it, I wonder, that occasioned the jealousie of it?
A26886Or will it follow that Receiving converteth, because the fears of unworthy Receiving do convert or conduce thereto?
A26886Or[ Whether it be their duty?]
A26886Or[ Whether such Children be the Objects of our Just, and Justifiable Action of Baptizing?]
A26886Our question is, what is a Disciple?
A26886Perhaps you will Object, If this be not Notorious ungodliness, what is?
A26886Q Ejusmodi verò parentibus natum infantem admitteres?
A26886Q. Quibus ergo Conditionibus?
A26886Quae est validitas Baptismi nisi haec, quòd baptismus tum praedicatus tum collatus confirmat omni Credenti Remissionem peccatorum?
A26886Quare?
A26886Quest Doth the inward Grace alway accompany the outward sign?
A26886Quid enim non habentibus Fadem& justitiam obsignarent?
A26886Quid enim non hathentibus fidem& justitiam obsignarem?]
A26886Quid est Credo in Jesum silium Dei unigenitum?
A26886Quid est credere in Christum crucifixum?
A26886Quid igitur illi baptismus in nomine Christi susceptus testatur minù, quàm omni Discipulo Christi?
A26886Quid sirevera Puer neque est filius Promissionis, divinae Electionis atque Misericordiae?
A26886Quid tu illos baptizat?
A26886Quinamsunt baptizandi?
A26886Quorsum ergò Baptismus eis traditur, si ante rem Baptismi habuerint?
A26886Shew where is a word of Promise that the Sacraments shall convert any one?
A26886Should not secret sin deterr aswell as open?
A26886Tell us how you will distinguish; will you not reject all that is apparently lying?
A26886The Apostle Peter writes to the scattered Jews that professed Christianity: And what kind of Christians or Believers did he take them for?
A26886The Church of the Colossians are called Saints: But what Saints?
A26886The Corinthians are called Saints; True: But what is meant by Saints?
A26886The Lord of that Feast saith not,[ Friend, why wast thou invited h ● ther?]
A26886The Question is[ Whether it be Gods command, that Ministers should baptize Children of notoriously ungodly men?]
A26886The Title indeed was Null ab initio, but prove that the Ordinance was so too?
A26886The second Question is, Whether the Minister may or must deliver the Sacrament to the unconverted, with this Intention that he may be converted by it?
A26886The third Question is, Whether the unconverted may Demand and receive that Sacrament as a means of Conversion?
A26886Then a Promise to be a Christian, so long hence may give right to Baptism: And who can tell how long it must be?
A26886Then we must re- baptize those whose ▪ Parents had not saving faith, because their Baptism is a Nullity: And what work will that make among us?
A26886Then you may well ask[ With what comfort can such Professors live in the sinful neglect of their own duty?]
A26886They may tell me so: but how will you prove that they tell me true?
A26886To proceed, the Church of Philippi are called Saints; True, but what Saints?
A26886To what purpose is the multitude of your Sacrifices?
A26886To which I answer; Are you able to search and know the heart?
A26886True: But what was meant by that word, and what Saints did they appear to Paul by their Profession to be?
A26886Two of these by a false oath, might put a man to death; and yet how seldom are such things done?
A26886Upon which Mr. Blake assumeth[ What have I spoke more than here is said?
A26886Was it not possible for a Jew upon mistake to Circumcise a man that had no Right to it, and yet upon some kind of misunderstood profession?
A26886Was not Paul sent by preaching to open mens eies and turn them from the power of Satan to God?
A26886We are next to consider, what are the Competitors which we now exclude?
A26886We suppose the child born after the Parents are excommunicate: And had that child a Right be ● ore he had a Be ● ng?
A26886What Church in all the world was ever of your Judgement?
A26886What Divines are there that deny the Sacraments to be mutual signs and seals, signifying and sealing our part as well as Gods?
A26886What did the Apostles require?
A26886What else is there to hinder any Heathen from the like Right?
A26886What heaps of clear Testimonies might we bring out of his Epistles?
A26886What if I distinguish the visible Kingdom from the Elect?
A26886What if by the Law of the Land a Traitors Estate be forfeit?
A26886What if twenty men will swear that I have written there is no God?
A26886What if you can not know the Parents justifying faith?
A26886What is necessary to make a man a true Member of the Catholick Church?
A26886What is required of persons to be baptized?
A26886What is the more sure Rule for our proceeding, which is here mentioned?
A26886What is this to our business?
A26886What is to be done in this strait?
A26886What matter is it then which is oftner mentioned, wh ● le both are mentioned, and both true?
A26886What more should a man expect to warrant him to do so?
A26886What proof of all this?
A26886What should the sence of this mysterie be?
A26886What take you for a sufficient disproof of a verbal profession?
A26886What them?
A26886What those Modes or concomitant Acts must be?
A26886What you do mean by[ a faith of Profession]?
A26886What''s that to the Major, or Argument?
A26886When I wrote 〈 ◊ 〉 the Index the contents of one section, thus[ whether it be virtually written in Scripture that Mr. Blake is justified?
A26886Where do you find in Scripture that such a faith is the Title to Sacraments?
A26886Whether Baxter and Woodbridge are not the same man?
A26886Whether God, who appointed this Sacrament, did intend that it should eventually be used to the Conversion of any souls?
A26886Whether Hypocrites and other Unregerate persons be called Christians, Believers, Saints, Church- members,& c. Univocally, Analogically or Equivocally?
A26886Whether any besides Regenerate Believers have a Right to the Sacraments given them by God, and may thereupon require them and receive them?
A26886Whether it be a Ministers duty to baptize them?
A26886Whether it be worth the while to write or preach to perswade men to offer such a service to God as doth but condemn themselves?
A26886Whether saving Sanctity or a common Sanctity and Faith short of it?
A26886Whether such subjects have Right by any Gift or Grant of God to themselves?
A26886Whether the Infants of Notoriously Ungodly Baptized Parents have Right to be Baptized?
A26886Whether the Infants of Notoriously ungodly Baptized Parents have Right to be Baptized?
A26886Whether the Infants of Notoriusly- ungodly baptized Parents have Right to be Baptized?
A26886Whether they have right for their Parents sake?
A26886Whether this Learned man know the judgement of all England?
A26886Who art thou that Judgest another mans servant?
A26886Who dare say that any of these were a Profession of Christianity?
A26886Who will doubt whether it can be so, when he sees it is so?
A26886Why did not Mr. Blake shew but one Text( for this one in hand) where any are said to be Justified upon a faith short of Justifying?
A26886Why do you expect that your Readers should believe your so frequent and evident mis- reports?
A26886Why then is it not done?
A26886Why then may not the same be said of an Infidel, that he may have a right for his child, though none for himself?
A26886Will Mr. Blake himself Baptize them, that will not thus profess?
A26886Will it follow that you may not know a Profession of it?
A26886Will my unpeaceableness excuse yours?
A26886Will you deny that the Scripture most commonly speaks of God himself himself in equivocal terms?
A26886Will you have Union and Communion with none but your own Party, that are in all things of your own Opinions?
A26886Will you take any verbal profession as a title, or not?
A26886Would Mr. Blake have the Children of all these rebaptized, or not?
A26886Yet remember that we say not that men ought to forbear coming that are unconverted; but that they ought to come; but how?
A26886You next add[ How will this make Christianity look with any better face?
A26886[ And who that dependeth on the mouth of Christ would baptize this man?
A26886[ Ergò servantur omnes ex pio parente oriundi?
A26886[ Q. Quid significat In Nomen?
A26886[ Quid est b. pazari in nomine, Patris& Filii& Spiritus sancti?
A26886[ Quid recipiunt Impii in Sacramentis?
A26886[ Sed quum is qui Papista est, non sit verè Christianus, non ejusmodi hominem adulium, nec dum baptizatum, ad Baptismum admitteres?
A26886[ is not here direction enough to help us to judge of the mind of God, whether infants are his Disciples and Servants or no?
A26886an Christi gratiam habeant, an illà sint destituti,& mendaciter dicant se credere?
A26886and a third, whether Baptism without it be a Nullity?
A26886and also whether they have not the same uncertainty of the sincerity of that lower Faith in the Professors, as of true saving Faith?
A26886and another to ask, To whom may we give it?
A26886and are you not put in all this upon the same uncertainties, and to the use of probabilities as we?
A26886and consequently, Whether Mr. Blakes doctrine have delivered them from difficulties, or ensnared them?
A26886and did I ever speak with more and higher Confidence?
A26886and doth he not averr that he never denied it?
A26886and how far?
A26886and how ill do you to wrong the Church of God by seeking to make men believe that these things are new and strange?
A26886and how is he to be dealt with?
A26886and in what words?
A26886and is no more acceptable to God than the Pharises washing cups, or than the cutting of their flesh, or the rent in the garment?
A26886and proceed on meer probabilities, as well as we?
A26886and so prove that to you to be the title to Baptism and the Lord''s Supper?
A26886and take a violent presumption as ground for some determinations?
A26886and that if they do it not sincerely, that is not yet justifying faith which they profess?
A26886and the only thing in doubt is, Whether the person be penitent or impenitent?
A26886and they will say yea withal their hearts?
A26886and what Saints?
A26886and what is that but( supposing assent) the true description of saving faith?
A26886and what other way is there of knowing the signification of any Language whatsoever?
A26886and what was necessary to warrant them to circumcise them?
A26886and what''s your answer to that, unless you distinguish of two sorts, and mean that another sort there are that inherite Ordinances?
A26886and when?
A26886and where?
A26886and whether Mr. Blake know where to fix himself, and how to describe his Dogmatical faith?
A26886and whether he do not yield the cause that I am maintaining?
A26886and whether they are willing to have God for their only God, and Christ for their only Saviour, and the Holy Ghost their Sanctifier?
A26886as if every promise were not de futuro; Is it de praesenti?
A26886but whether they believe in God the Father, Son and the Holy Ghost; and renounce the World, Flesh, and Devil?
A26886but whether( as he affirmeth) to all alike?
A26886but you say so?
A26886can you discern sincerity by an infall ● ble judgment?
A26886for it was done by his own appointment: but[ Friend how camest thou in hither?]
A26886hath God bid or permitted this man to speak all this for nought?
A26886how much will Worcester- shire Congregations where this is received exceed other Congregations where unanimously it is denyed?]
A26886if I saw them Baptized with mine eyes?
A26886is not here a plain concession, that a profession of justifying faith is requisite to Baptism?
A26886like Dr. John White''s Catechumene, that being asked what Jesus Christ was?
A26886must I write against them all?
A26886or a ground for such a violent presumption that a man doth lye and dissemble, and is no Christian?
A26886or all this Nation, if they had been Heathens this hundred years, because their Ancestors were justly presumed to be Christians?
A26886or as a sign of their mind?
A26886or how will this warrant his new kind of Baptism, which must be administred upon the Profession of another sort of Faith?
A26886or in whole?
A26886or is the Administration of the Lords Supper to such a Nullity, or only unprofitable?
A26886or not intelligible?
A26886or that ever man was admitted to them upon such a profession?
A26886or that receiving is a means ordained and enjoyned for conversion, because seeing and hearing is?
A26886or themselves, if it were their case?
A26886or what one feather is plucked from his plume?
A26886or whether the necessary order of his duty be not first to believe and repent, and then to claim these ordinances?
A26886or whether they were admitted on the profession of another kind of faith?
A26886per gratiam supernaturalem,& viam illius gratiae;& quo tandem?
A26886tas, nisi Dei cultus?
A26886that is, I Invited thee not to come without the wedding garment to disgrace my house, but to bring it with thee?
A26886that is, by lying?
A26886that is,[ who can know anothers heart?]
A26886true or false?
A26886what bone is broken?
A26886what cross evidence will you take for currant?
A26886what is meant by that Baptism, the Right whereto we are now enquiring after?
A26886while we must judge of mens sincerity, we are left at uncertainty; and who knows among al these difficulties whom to judge godly, and whom ungodly?
A26886why saith he[ Who would not believe that I had directly asserted it, or made some unsavooy vaunts about it?]
A26886will it follow that eventually faith never followeth baptism, nor baptism never goeth before faith?
A26886will it not disable and discredit his profession with you?
A26886would ever the Church of Christ Baptize any but such?
A26886yea or unnecessary?
A26886you have Christ himself, and do you grudg them the name of Christians, or the bare symbole or signs of his body and blood?
A26886— Justam Ecclesiae formam adscripsimus — Vecatur à Deo quisquis ad Ecclesiam pertinet è natura& modulo naturali suo: quá autem?
A26886—[ Instituitur quidem disputatio acuta de eo, quinam sint populus Dei& participes Remissionis peccatorum per Christum?
A39573& 18. infants have an hearing the spirit opens their ears, quo magistro, quam cito discitur, quod docet?
A39573& c. after he had washed their feet he saies to them: know you what I have done to you?
A39573& c. to particularize more punctually then we?
A39573( have a care of your shinnes( good now) by all means) do the children of believers fall from it?
A39573( quid ● … ides?
A39573( saies he) no nor so much as heard of it,( say they) no?
A39573( saies the Pope) when you question him for his Dedicative holiness, if so once why not now?
A39573* Whether the magistrate be the minister of Christ, as God onley, or as Mediatour also, I mean God man?
A395731, 2, 3, saying in malice and mockage, What do these feeble folk?
A395731. can you blame us therefore if we contend for the right baptism?
A3957312, 10. and holy i. e. qualitative, though not quantitative, in the same manner, though not the same measure?
A3957312. in vvhich of all these places dare they allovv us the prime signification of the vvord?
A3957314. and have 〈 ◊ 〉 works,& c. whereby onely faith is proved to be true indeed as it is professed, can that faith save him?
A3957314. how can they believe on him of whom they have not heard?
A3957316. and now why tarriest thou?
A3957316. as I am sure we can not warrantably, because not congruously, do otherwise?
A3957316. is plain, and now why tarriest thou?
A3957316. verse, who ever believeth not shall be damned, that all infants are certainly damned?
A3957316. when brought by us against infant baptism) where are the Scriptures that do mention infants, so as to institute their baptism?
A3957317. that they laid their hands on them, doth not them denote out the very same?
A3957318. a den of theeves?
A3957318. and excommunicated, if need be, in case of obstinacy, if under no Ecclesiasticall Government?)
A3957318. saiest where is the promise of his coming?
A3957319. commission plain enough to baptism infants, where all nations are bid to be discipled and baptized?
A395732. by the halves, saying repent, repent?
A395732. have ye received the holy spirit since ye believed?
A395732. is meant of more layings on of hands, when it expresly speaks but of one?
A395732. which I direct to as a second place wherein we may find it preached?
A3957321. who hath begotten me these, seeing I have lost my children?
A3957322. and also in the Rubrick where it being askt what is required of persons to be baptized?
A3957322. without gross absurdity having christn''d them all long before he ever preacht to them?)
A3957325.?)
A395733 Why are they not after admitted to the supper?
A395733. is not this the Carpenter?)
A3957333. to the Jaylor asking Sirs what must I do to be saved?
A3957339. and also concerning a people that were already baptized with the spirit, asks who can forbid water why these may not be baptized?
A3957342. cui nativitas ei facult as auctrix, nutrix; et quare non nutrimentum?
A3957342. the first Gospel ministry bap ● … ized, were in immediatly before they baptized them?
A3957347. who can require these persons to be baptized in water that have received the spirit, and are baptized with the spirit as well as we?
A395735. and pose liberal and bountiful maintenance, and rich Revenues to be the chief corner stone in their church work?
A395736. on baptized believers be ever the more excluded, or the more incuded rather in all likelyhood among the rest?
A395739. and the trembling and astonished said Lord what 〈 ◊ 〉 thou have me to do?
A39573A ● … deus potius non suisse?
A39573Again you had much need( had you not think you?)
A39573Again, I would ask what warrand they have for dipping, or baptizing garments more then the Papists have for baptizing bells?
A39573Again, who holds or practises such a thing as naked dipping of women and maids?
A39573And Thirdly be taken up again as A. R. and you seem to reason?
A39573And as Peter in his first preaching the praeceptory part of Christs Gospel to the Jews, when they enquired what they should do?
A39573And how no answer, but no answer, Dr. Chamberlain had from Dr. Gouge to this question, Whether the sprinkling of Infants were of God or man?
A39573And lastly whereas Mr. Baxter queries so oft when Mr. Tombs would have such baptized, the set time of whose conversion?
A39573And lastly, whereas he challenges us to shew where ever God pronounced any blessed, and yet took them for none of his visible Church?
A39573And now because you ask how we know they have faith whom we baptize?
A39573And now why tarriest thou?
A39573And what mean you by your Pastors leaving you to take up some other call or imployment?
A39573And what then?
A39573And whereas he saies of infants may they not be called Gods servants from the meer interest of dominion that God hath to them?
A39573Are soules all equal in their Creation, and are souls which are all equal the subject of faith?
A39573Are these your Examples of baptizing otherwaies then by dipping?
A39573Are you not ashamed of such a blind businesse as this?
A39573Buried?
A39573But Sirs is it so in earnest in your opinion, that no baptism no hope of salvation?
A39573But Sirs, will this hold a triall think you by the word?
A39573But by what proofs do they confirm they have the true Church?
A39573But if you stand so much on the signification of the word, why do you not drown persons when you baptize them?
A39573But is it so Sirs?
A39573But is it so that 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 signifies in and is so rendred in that place, and many more?
A39573But quorsum haec?
A39573But should you help the ungodly, and love them that hate the Lord?
A39573But then what simple stuff were this?
A39573But what if this be but a meer Chimaera of those mens coining, how much lesse are we then excused in our non- submission?
A39573But what of this?
A39573But where was your Church then all this while till these latter times?
A39573Can any man forbid water why these should not be baptized, which have received the holy spirit as well as we?
A39573Can you be baptized in a better manner think you then that wherein Iohn baptized Christ, and Philip the Eunuch?
A39573Coventry, Cheapside, Charing,& others?
A39573Daniel was thrown into and taken up out of the Lyons den, does not that shew plainly enough that he was in it?
A39573Did I give, and grant so much?
A39573Did not Philip baptize the Samaritans and the Eunuch?
A39573Do not the infants of unbelievers very often prove believers, and so elect, and precious?
A39573Do you know any thing against the particular infant of an heathen?
A39573Doth not Philip to one that askt him this question, why may I not be baptized?
A39573Easter, Christmas, Whitsunday,& c. didst not thou O Presbyter?
A39573Fifthly, any where viz: at home or abroad, in Inns or other places, as occasion is, but onely or for the most part in your great stone houses?
A39573Fiftly, if as to the time of those two services, the question be askt Quando?
A39573First do you conclude that all the children of believing parents have it now?
A39573First which way come your natural seed, you being but Gentiles in the flesh, to be the seed of Abraham?
A39573First, Risum teneat is amici?
A39573First, Si aliquid quare non quicquid?
A39573First, if we ask( as de subjecto) this question quis?
A39573First, is it so that the command to circumcise infants is vertually a command to us to baptize them?
A39573For First, is there no Medium between being a reprobate, and a present having the holy spirit?
A39573Fourthly, if, as to the quality, special properties, uses, ends and offices of these two dispensations, the question be asked in quale quid?
A39573Go teach all Nations baptizing them, teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I command you, and now why 〈 ◊ 〉?
A39573God forbid: know ye not that every one that''s baptized into Christ, is baptized into his death?
A39573Good Lord how is the practise of the truth made a reproach unto thy people, and a derision dayly?
A39573Good Sirs, what mean you by this?
A39573He answers, the commission being for all Nations disciples were made in all Countreys; how soone saith he came the word to this Nation?
A39573Here reason demands of you why after bap ● … ism you admit not infants to the supper?
A39573Holland, Germany,& c. and bring the word unto us, that we may hear it and do it?
A39573How can a man escape choaking Sirs, if he be put and kept under the water?
A39573How do those men and women that are baptized at years make it appear to those that baptize them, that they have faith and the holy spirit?
A39573How often shall I adjure you the next time you write to write no more then truth at least in matter of fact?
A39573How shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard?
A39573How you gather from these places a dipping of the whole man over head and under water?
A39573How?
A39573I am sure it was a custome before we were born; how shall our children come to have names, if they be not Christned?
A39573I answer how many and in how short a time does the man mean?
A39573I answer, who doubts of that?
A39573I beseech you Sirs, upon what grounds?
A39573I demand therefore yet once again, what seed of Abraham your infants are, in that thereupon you undertake( as so) to baptize them?
A39573I pray Sir ● …, what''s b ● … me of the odd five and a half?
A39573I reply thus, were not Abraham, Isaac and Iacob their fleshly fathers?
A39573I say what a bald way of arguing is this?
A39573I wonder who baptized Iohn the Baptist, that was the greatest administrator that ever was?
A39573I wonder who those are?
A39573I would know with these new dippers saith Mr. Cook, whether the parties to be doused and dipped may be baptized in a garment, or no?
A39573I''le saie it again that you may consider it, for sure you did not consider what you said when you said it, what children of day old?
A39573Iesus Christ is in you except ye be Reprobates?
A39573If any should ask this question, what hinders why I may not eat the supper?
A39573If it be further askt, how faith is bread in them?
A39573If it be inquired how faith can be said to be in them without their consent?
A39573If it was so?
A39573If under the Law, why not under the Gospel?
A39573If you will have any thing holy with that Ceremonial holiness now, why not every thing that then was so?
A39573Impertinency?
A39573Is it not the work of the spirit to infuse faith?
A39573Is it so Sirs, that the spirit is not tyed to work by means in little children, in the same cases, wherein he works by means in men, and women?
A39573Is not faith a work as well as repentance, and the rest?
A39573Is that Scripture think you intended to infants?
A39573It makes them count the blood of the Covenant an unholy thing, for if it be holy, what need they repeat it?
A39573It s own name?
A39573Just so Sirs, and not a jot otherwise?
A39573Let them gain what they can, whom can they gain?
A39573Let us search, and try, and turn, was there ever any confession of sin without it?
A39573Moreover if the Apostles did say on hands at years, though Christ in infancy, what if Christ had baptized those infants in infancy also?
A39573Mothers, as well as by the hands of the Priests onely?
A39573Must they not go down to the water( saith he) if they would use it?
A39573No Sirs?
A39573No Sirs?
A39573No certainly, And why not?
A39573No?
A39573No?
A39573Nothing more ordinary then to have words out of their prime signification?
A39573Now if it be the sincerity that is looked after, who knoweth what day or year the child began tobe sincere in his profession?
A39573O ye house of Levi is the spirit of the Lord thus streitned?
A39573Quis?
A39573Reason say you?
A39573Rivers, Iordan, Enon, many waters, and why?
A39573Secondly all male servants upon the masters single faith, as well as male cchildren on the fathers?
A39573Secondly be kept under water to signifie his burial?
A39573Secondly kept under water to signify his burial?
A39573Secondly why do you, or how can you sign them as heirs of the Gospel promise so simply upon that account only?
A39573Secondly( Risum teneatis amici?)
A39573Secondly, Si aliqualitèr, quarè non aequalitèr?
A39573Secondly, are you sure they were infants of believers of whom Christ saies, whoever offends one of these little ones that believe in me?
A39573Secondly, do you know so precisely which infants are Elect, and which Reprobate, as to take upon you to distinguish them by baptism?
A39573Secondly, how doth it appear at all that godly and believing parents children then had faith more usually then children of ungodly parents?
A39573Secondly, how far forth do they make it appear to you?
A39573Secondly, if( as to the nature, matter and essential form or being of the Rites themselves) we ask the question quid?
A39573Secondly, let me ask you, is Gods witness, Gods testimony true, or is it false?
A39573Secondly, what are these littles to the lump?
A39573Secondly, when had they it begotten in them?
A39573Secondly, whereas t is askt what persons are to say or do,( at the administration of laying hands) that they may be found faithful in that point?
A39573Seventhly, if( as to the account and warrant) it be demanded Cur?
A39573Si aliquando quare non nunc?
A39573Sirs where is the blessedness you speak of?
A39573Sirs, let me ask you two questions, first are you sure these are infants indeed?
A39573Sirs, what children of the Jews had faith in their infancy witnessed by Circumcision, were they the children of the believing or unbelieving Jews?
A39573Sirs, what pretty intricate blind bo- beep Divinity is this of yours?
A39573Sixthly, if, as to the administrator, it be ask quibus auxiliis?
A39573Some who are those I trow?
A39573That the Covenant of grace is for substance not two but in all ages one and the same within it self who denies?
A39573There may he washings though, and dippings too, but what needs such a totall dipping as you use?
A39573Therefore Sirs, how hath Satan bewitched you that you can not believe and obey the truth?
A39573They lose it again when they come to more years, else why are they taught the element of faith?
A39573Thirdly if, as to the place where, we ask the question ubi?
A39573Thirdly, is it any more evident to you that all believers infants are taught of God, then t is that unbelievers infants are taught by him?
A39573Thirdly, on the eighth day onely, and neither sooner nor later, nor one day before it nor behind it?
A39573Thirdly, was Circumcision Gods witness, yea Gods seal to assure men of thus much, that those children to whom it was set had faith?
A39573Thirdly, what judgement do you passe upon believers infants to be the subjects of baptism, rather then other infants?
A39573This is aliud a nogate; a plain absurd aberration from the question, which is not whether it be a sin ordinarily to dip naked or no?
A39573To those without?
A39573To which I reply, saith he, where is your Scripture for that?
A39573Totally drowned?
A39573Unless they be baptized in their infancy?
A39573Was not that of Paul spoken of men onely at years?
A39573Well then they were broken off: but why?
A39573Well what if it was so in the primitive times, that total dipping was the custome, must it therefore needs be so now?
A39573What Infants of a day old?
A39573What Sirs is the Gospel, the plain simple gospel, such a maeander as this?
A39573What a strange conceit is this?
A39573What again?
A39573What again?
A39573What again?
A39573What an egregious untruth is there?
A39573What force therefore is in this Argument to conclude against the truth of our way?
A39573What frivolous quibling is all this?
A39573What is that Analogy and Agreement which is between the sign and the thing signifyed in baptism?
A39573What is the result of this discourse, to forbid all disputation with HHHim?
A39573What is this to the present question and position concerning no more inclinablenesse to holy actions in children of Christians, then of insidels?
A39573What pretty Checker work is there in your judgements about one and the same thing?
A39573What prety Gim- cracks are here?
A39573What quarrels and jarres between the Fryers of several orders?
A39573What saith he if we could not prove that the English Church was before Luther, Must it needs follow that the doctrine we hold is untrue?
A39573What still Sirs?
A39573What then?
A39573Where in the Cherub that covereth?
A39573Where should this bath be prepared?
A39573Where was your Church before Luther?
A39573Whether infants were the true subject?
A39573Whether it be just to load them that still stick to the truth, with the blame of all their blasphemies that go off from it?
A39573Whether sprinkling were the true manner of baptizing?
A39573Whether their profession, since it is possible they may lie, can make it appear infallibly?
A39573Which of all these three are to be found in your aspersion?
A39573Who sees not the weaknesse, the wretchednesse of this consequence?
A39573Why then should not children under the Gospel receive baptism, which the Adversaries confess to be the Seal of the Gospel- Covenant?
A39573Yea Sirs?
A39573Yea Sirs?
A39573Yea say you so?
A39573Yea surely Sirs, why not?
A39573above all men, who so strenuously contends that by the word Kingdoms of this world is meant not in part only, but the whole kingdom?
A39573all the dying infants of unbelievers?
A39573all your skill in Physiogmony can never find it: or can you argue ad negationem habitus, to no holiness in an infidels infant more then in anothers?
A39573and I said what shall I do Lord?
A39573and also to what purpose did she perform it?
A39573and are not soules which are all equall in their creation the subject of it?
A39573and as ordinarily believers infants( when they come to years I mean) prove reprobates?
A39573and doth not that imply that else he might not?
A39573and doth not this evince as much for women?
A39573and how can they be sent to preach to infants that understand not what is said?
A39573and how can they hear without a preacher?
A39573and how can they preach except they be sent?
A39573and how hear without a Preacher?
A39573and how much more the losse of Christ himself?
A39573and how much more then ours?
A39573and if no analogie why are we said sacramentally in baptism to be buried, and raised?
A39573and if not, why not be satisfied that it was preacht by some at least of Christs Apostles to all baptized believers?
A39573and if so, then must not this unbelieving parent being a Roo ● …, have the same kind of holiness the child hath?
A39573and if so, why he blames us more then himself, that, do what we can, so many run to ruin?
A39573and is it the consequent that the children of believing parents have it now?
A39573and is not swilling under water a more effectuall way of washing and clensing then sprinkling?
A39573and is that seal of his firm to, i. e, so sure that it can not fail?
A39573and so upwards till we come thither, are you able if we ask you who sprinkled you?
A39573and such judgement is as due to one of these as to the other?
A39573and such like how little do these look each like the other?
A39573and that a similitude of Christs death, burial and rising again, to be represented by dipping in water, is signified here?
A39573and though remote ones, yet were they not their true fathers after the flesh still as much as ever?
A39573and to the company at Cornelius''s house, and Ananias in his to Paul, when he quaeried what he should do?
A39573and what need at all that the Committees be so cumbered with the care of such affairs?
A39573and whether because they all desired to go to heaven, therefore they were at heaven?
A39573and who hath brought up these?
A39573and who him?
A39573and who him?
A39573and who him?
A39573and who him?
A39573and who him?
A39573and who him?
A39573and who him?
A39573and who ordained those that ordained you?
A39573and who them?
A39573and who them?
A39573and who them?
A39573and why not male servants though unbelieving Moores, Turks or Pagans if of believing masters?
A39573and why should not this administration of the covenant in outward ordinances be after the manner of that of old?
A39573and why then?
A39573and yet do these include and comprize infants as much as men at years?
A39573and you Presbyterians where was your Church before Calvin?
A39573are infants of a day old capable of Baptism, that can not so much as be instructed in principles much less be begotten to the true Religion?
A39573are not repentance from dead works, and belief towards God with all the heart, and confession of sins, and calling on God such kind of matters?
A39573are not these priviledges belonging to men, why then( if yours and Mr Marshalls assertion be true) not to infants as well as men?
A39573are the seed of true believers true converts mostly by birth?
A39573are these your doings?
A39573are they not among the number of souls capable to eat, every one pro suo modulo, according to the measure of his eating and digestion?
A39573are they not mercies, administrations, merciful administrations of God, extended to all nations?
A39573are they shut out of the kingdom of heaven?
A39573are we more tied to follow his example in that, then in the dispensation of laying on of hands?
A39573are we wiser then our forefathers?
A39573are you able to assign who began our way of baptism first of all in the world, unlesse you begin as high as Iohn the baptist?
A39573are you not then condemned out of your own mouths to perpetual abhorring?
A39573are your Pastors also such Idol shepheards, as it may be supposed now and then will leave their flocks for any other imployment?
A39573baptism for the Hot Countryes; and Rantism for the Cold?
A39573baptism, may stand in some proportion to its signatum, as well as the other i. e. circumcision?
A39573because he had told them above that there should come one, that should delude many with lyes?
A39573because the kingdomes of this world are, or else shall be the kindomes of God and Christ?
A39573behold I was left alone, these where have they been?
A39573besides what more to believers than unbelievers infants?
A39573both branded for reprobates?
A39573both which men direct their different doctrines to Mr. Tombes in order to his direction: but how shall that man be resolved?
A39573but if they had none in infancy, then how can you deny but that they had none?
A39573but may they thereupon be called disciples, and be baptized?
A39573but no marvel if the Cat winckt, when both her eyes were out?
A39573but what of that?
A39573but what then?
A39573but whether Rome be that universal Church or no that can not erre?
A39573but whether we ordinarily use that kind of dipping?
A39573by believing: nay the spiritual seed: quid ni?
A39573by fleshly descent?
A39573by whose hands these ordinances are to be administred?
A39573can some scores of well meaning Priests give the denomination of an holy PPriesthood, godly Ministry to those legions of them that lie in wickednesse?
A39573could that water that toucht his legs while he waded, be more mischievous to him, then the water that washed the blood of his stripes?
A39573creed that God hath promised to be merciful to Godly mens seed in general, in contradistinction to the seed of the wicked?
A39573cur?
A39573denies it, with whom how often is it exprest that baptism is the first visible entrance into it?
A39573did he build them upon one part of the foundation, and not on the other part?
A39573did he constitute them partly upon it, and partly beside it?
A39573did he no more then sprinkle, or pour a few drops of water on him?
A39573did not some of you Masters, Provosts, Fellowes of Colledges and such like?
A39573did not ye O Presbyterians?
A39573did you press them to death i th''Press, or lose them i th''Ashes, whetein you had a design to have smothered it all?
A39573do we not in common loquution say the same, while we say sprinkled in a font, or in a Bason?
A39573do you believe in God the Father, and Christ& c. and will you be baptized in this faith?
A39573dost thou forsake tho divel?
A39573doth it prove baptism to be the cause of that grosness that often followes, when a person is baptized?
A39573doth our denying baptism to an infant before he dies send him to hell sooner then your delaying it till he be dead?
A39573doth that phrase( I say) they which be of faith signifie believers infants?
A39573drowning, racking, fleaing, stabbing, tearing with hot pincers, and( to use his own phrase) the severest punishments they could devise?
A39573first I wonder how they came by it, sith the word saies faith comes by hearing, and how can there be believing on him of whom they have not heard?
A39573for 42. months, or a 1260 years, as theirs was for 70 years?
A39573for either he was baptized surely, or else he was not, if he was ever baptized at all, who baptized him?
A39573for how does he speak, and that out of these Scriptures we are upon, that we ought thus to be baptized?
A39573for none denies but that it hath, but whether the Pope be at all that head?
A39573for the living to the dead?
A39573for what else can they pretend?
A39573for when he queries who can?
A39573from the Gospel to a law long since ended?
A39573from the living to the dead?
A39573from the substance to the shadow?
A39573from the truth to the type?
A39573have any of the Rulers of the Pharisees believed on him?
A39573have not you the CCClergy?
A39573he to infants, and they onely to persons past infancy?
A39573how can Turks and Pagans infants be saved?
A39573how can they be saved if they die unchristned?
A39573how crookedly close do you keep to your own coppy?
A39573how different are they?
A39573how else could they have known it?
A39573how far do they differ?
A39573how far do you fall short of the Jewes in this also?
A39573how farre is he from it as now he stands, whilst he saies plainly he will have no baptism?
A39573how greatly doth your manner of baptism differ from it?
A39573how hear without a preacher?
A39573how is it possible that it should not signifie washing so long as it signifies dipping, dipping being no other then a kind of washing?
A39573how miserably do you your selves misse of hitting right with it here too?
A39573how pretily have you put these terms[ practised by the Church of God] into the very question, and that too as it stands stated beeween us?
A39573how rhe bells began to play their parts against our preaching, when you had done, by the appointment of who knows not whom?
A39573how so?
A39573how then came it to pass that the most of the Iews and their children sucessively in all generations had not faith when they came to years?
A39573how then dare you aver so peremptorily, so universally that every administration that extendeth to all nations, belongeth to infants as well as men?
A39573how those men and women whom I had baptized did make it appear that they had faith, and the holy spirit?
A39573how will not a poor, marred, mocked, misreputed Saviour, and gospel in any wise down with them?
A39573how will you ever be able to make that good?
A39573i. e. the supper as well as baptism?
A39573i. e. to ungodly mens children as well as to those of godly parents?
A39573if no exemption from a hotter service, why from a colder for the lifes sake?
A39573if not where is then the analogie?
A39573if so, how is it that when they are grown, the children of unbelievers have holiness very often, when as oft the other prove wicked, and have not?
A39573if so, why not to repentance, and self denial also?
A39573if unholy, how do they prophane it?
A39573if unholy, in so saying oh how do you prophane it?
A39573if you will needs Iudaize at all, why not in all as well as the Pope?
A39573if you will needs utter falsehood in matter of Doctrine?
A39573in as much as there s that required in order to baptisme which infants can no more do, then they can do what''s required to the supper?
A39573in the womb?
A39573infallibly?
A39573is Christ thus divided?
A39573is he not as holy as the child is, and so as capable of being baptized, and in covenant thereby?
A39573is it not very fit therefore that they should still be used, the Church being yet under age?
A39573is not innocency in the whole state of infants, even in unbelievers infants as much to the full as in the other?
A39573is not the story of Naamans washing himself seven times in Iordan full enough to our use, because there is no mention of his putting off and on?
A39573is their any worldly imployment to which the Pastors office must give way so to as to cease for its sake, when it comes in place?
A39573is there any more Specimen or shew of holiness in them then in these?
A39573is there any promise of God, whereby he stands ingaged to infuse holiness into these infants in infancy, when he will not infuse it into the other?
A39573is there any such manglements as these to be found there?
A39573little ones literally taken in the sixth?
A39573meani ● … g trow, that therfore it doth not go before it?
A39573men of strife and contention to the whole earth?
A39573must not all people search it?
A39573no: who doub ● … s of that?
A39573not one scruple?
A39573now therefore Quid rides?
A39573or I would I knew what you mean by constitution?
A39573or any other part*?
A39573or are all infants of unbelievers reprobate, so that you may accordingly denominate them for such by whole sale as you do?
A39573or believing infants?
A39573or but probably?
A39573or have you not rather taken it for granted from me whether I will, or no?
A39573or if after birth, on what day on the 1st, 2d, 3d, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, or 8th?
A39573or if there were no more then this half an hours reading, how is it you give so large an Account of it here?
A39573or if they can not, can not your Churches see to them a little what they lack?
A39573or in baptism ask, how the baptizer must handle the person baptized, and where he must take hold on him, when he dips him?
A39573or in token of his resurrection to a new life?
A39573or is aspersion an action as answerable to a burial and resurrection, and painting it out as lively as submersion and emersion do?
A39573or may the spirit blow no where, but where thou listest?
A39573or must a man bring you another, and that a better kind of faith to the one, than he had need care for toward the other?
A39573or must they search and find no more truth in it then thou findest?
A39573or not?
A39573or rather by who knows not whom?
A39573or shall the doctrine of Rome be ever the truer because of Antiquitie only?
A39573or that of certainty?
A39573or the Major part of it?
A39573or those thousands Peter promised the holy spirit to, were they all reprobates, because they yet had it not, when he spake to them?
A39573or to prove believe ● … s infants to have it exclusively of the infants of unbelievers?
A39573or wast thou set to keep people out from it under lock and key?
A39573or what is it you would have?
A39573or whether Christ hath not more water baptismes then one?
A39573or whether dipping in Rivers be so necessary to baptism, that none are accounted baptized, but those that are dipped after such a manner?
A39573qualis?
A39573quando?
A39573quibus auxiliis?
A39573quid?
A39573return this answer, if thou believest with all thy heart thou mayest?
A39573secondly, whether they ever had it if you ask whether they ever had any?
A39573shall the Parliament and their Committees never have their liberty to attend onely, and perfectly the true liberties of the subject?
A39573shall we impute that fault to his being baptized?
A39573shall we think that Peter taught the principles of the doctrine of Christ, all which he was to lay as one foundation among them, by the halves?
A39573shall we think that all Christs ministers descend lineally from the loines of Antichrist?
A39573shall we think that so many learned Orthodox divines would practise it if it were not the truth?
A39573shall we( saith he, for so his sense is) continue in sin, i. e. we that are dead to it, and have been all baptized into Christ in token of it?
A39573sith the cause of all such sacramental locution is because the sacraments are( as Austin saies) pictures of the things signified in them?
A39573so that by the same Reason that we deny one of these to be in them, it may be therefore denied that they have the other?
A39573some people believe therefore all must be baptized, Secondly, had the Jews children faith?
A39573tells us that some branches only were broken off, therfore not infants, It is true all were not broken off, and why?
A39573that have bought it for money?
A39573that have have gotten it by brawling in the law?
A39573that is strange: what parts of Christendome have you lived, or do you live in?
A39573that is worse then all the rest: but I wonder what is if that be not the prime?
A39573that it is a miracle to be dipped and not destroyed, then what a strange man is he to say so?
A39573that of charity?
A39573that there is now no iniquity at all?
A39573that they were all the children of God by faith in Christ: and how doth he prove it that they were so?
A39573that words are oft used out of their prime significations?)
A39573the Apostles themselves?
A39573the Swine ran into the sea, were they not then in it?
A39573the duty and ordinance of baptism?
A39573the visible church of Christ or the visible kingdome of the devil believers infants are visibly in before baptism?
A39573the way of faith?
A39573then Sirs why do you not keep close to your command, and by Analogy baptize precisely on the eighth day, but on any other as you see good?
A39573then pray how doth the promise of the Gospel appear to belong one jo ● … more to believers children, then to unbelievers?
A39573therefore is it not rather think you a Civil and Matrimonial then an Ecclesiastical,& faederall sanctity?
A39573therefore why should we not sorrow as those without hope?
A39573they are the children of believers?
A39573they went down both of them unto the water, both Philip and the Eunuch?
A39573till they visibly appear to have them, yet under the Law they were in covenant, and inchurched for all that and why?
A39573to come out of Babilon, and be separate?
A39573to testifie to the world that they had faith?
A39573to the parents upon their own faith, to the children upon the parents faith?
A39573to what purpose doth he with such prolixity proceed to prove, what no sober minded man of either party doth deny?
A39573ubi?
A39573unto what then were you baptized,( saies he) if at least you have not so much as heard of it?
A39573was he sprinkled into Iordan?
A39573was it set to Ishmael as Gods witness that Ishmael had faith?
A39573watchman what of the night?
A39573we have Abraham to our father?
A39573were there ever such contradictions as these committed to paper before?
A39573were they not the seed of Abraham still, that stood without faith in the old visible Church to the very end of it?
A39573what Commission have any to baptize in that manner?
A39573what a logical lump of artificial non- sense?
A39573what a pittious pla ● … ster is here applied to men wounded in conscience, and smarting under the direfull apprehensions of Gods wrath?
A39573what a poor shift is this?
A39573what a strange extraordinary expression is that?
A39573what again Sirs, what again?
A39573what circumcision was, and what your baptism?
A39573what comfort can we have from the Covenant made with, and the promises to our children& c?
A39573what communion, what part hath light with darknsss, Christ with Belial, the Temple of God and Idolators, believers and infidells?
A39573what do you speak suppositively of it still?
A39573what dribling Divinity is this?
A39573what hinders why I may not be baptized?
A39573what hopes of our infant salvation without baptism?
A39573what if the Committee should chance to be Heterodox it self?
A39573what imployment may they lawfully leave their flocks for, with whom they are in fellowship so as to stand Pastors no more among them?
A39573what inveteracy between the CCClergy of the severall FFFormes of Government?
A39573what is the gleaning to the vintage?
A39573what is the reason that you exclude infants here?
A39573what is the visible sign or form in baptism?
A39573what made Bernard complain that t was laught at among other ridiculosities as praying to, and for the dead?
A39573what made Imperiall lawes, and Synodical cannons enjoin it under such strict penalties?
A39573what man that devotes himself to the comparing of Scripture with Scripture can imagine it?
A39573what more to any then to all?
A39573what never?
A39573what not one way, nor other otherwise, then of old?
A39573what not water enough in nor yet about all Ierusalem to dipp a man over head in?
A39573what ore& ore, and oreagain?
A39573what pretty, cutted stuff is here?
A39573what then?
A39573what things persons were specially obliged to by them?
A39573what was specially signified to persons in them?
A39573what was the Scripture given for thee only to look in?
A39573what were the special properties, purposes, uses, ends, and offices of these two several administrations?
A39573what whole Countrey clashes, and consumptions have been made in Germany between the Calvinists and Lutherans?
A39573what will you onely think things, and thrust your thoughts of them as oracles upon all others?
A39573what''s this I trow toward the eviction of the other?
A39573when circumcision, and when your baptism are by right to be dispensed?
A39573when he visiteth what will you answer?
A39573where circumcision was dispensed, and where your selves say baptism ought to be?
A39573where had thy message by the mouth of Paul lesse acceptance then at the university of Athens?
A39573where hath the word now lesse then in the Academies, Christian Academies, seemingly reforming Academies?
A39573whether God could have chosen, whether he would have been God or no?
A39573whether no other baptizing th ● … n that which Christ and the Eunuch had is lawful?
A39573whether the ordinances of Christ, that were in use of old, are of right to be practised still?
A39573whether they have it?
A39573which is as much as to say, whether another water baptism may not serve the turn as well?
A39573which of the two think you doth it expresse, such persons at years onely, as are in the faith, or onely the natural fleshly seed of such?
A39573which shall he cleave to?
A39573who altered the holy Altars, and alienated to other use the holy Altar Clothes?
A39573who but ye O Priests have been in these things more sacrilegi church- robbers, then sacerdotes, or givers of holy things?
A39573who councel''d away the curious crucifixes?
A39573who hath broken the Laws, changed the ordinances, broken the everlasting Covenant, for which a curse now is devouring the earth?
A39573who hath made void Christs commands by their own traditions?
A39573who hath taken away from the sacraments, the right subjects, and manner of administration?
A39573who hath trodden down the holy City?
A39573who have justified the wicked for reward, and taken away the righteousnesse of the righteous from him?
A39573who prophaned the holy Fonts in all the holy Churches and Chappels, because they found the people Idolizing them?
A39573who pul''d away the holy railes from before the sanctum sanctorum in every holy quire where they were stated?
A39573who shall descend into the deep tobringChrist to us from the dead?
A39573who shall go into Scotland and brings us a directory and platform of government from them?
A39573who slew the parsons of the witnesses?
A39573who so far as they incourage us to no more then what there is a written word for, must be heeded by us in these daies, as those Prophets were by them?
A39573who spoiled the holy Cathedrals of their holy Organs, and Popish pipes and pictures?
A39573who would think a mininister should be so moped as to make these two alike warrantable?
A39573whose words shall he take, the Doctors or the Divines?
A39573why bap ● … ize you any females, when God commanded males onely to be circumcised?
A39573why else did they both do and desire it?
A39573why even this, if the whole kingdom be the Lords, then infants must unavoidably be members of Christs Church, and if we ask how comes this about?
A39573why more ad ne gationem baptismi?
A39573why taught in order to the receiving it?
A39573why then do you say sometimes again, that from a holiness which is in both they are co- contributers of holiness to the Infant?
A39573why then not exempted from that for the sake of their incapacity, as well as from other things?
A39573why then( if that be the ground you will needs go upon) must not these be baptized as well as the other?
A39573why they circumcised infants, and why you baptize them?
A39573wil: thou be baptized& c?
A39573will it follow that we must follow their fashion in that particular?
A39573will it not appear much more plainly then, that infants are not capable to be made disciples?
A39573will it therefore follow that it is to be omitted, and not made use of at all?
A39573will they fortify themselves against our Orthodox D ● … vines?
A39573will they make ● … n end in a day to reform, which is many a years work for a learned Synod?
A39573will they revive the stones, even the dead bones of old Hereticks, out of the heaps of ● … bish that are burnt?
A39573will they sacrifice without a Priest among them?
A39573will you alwaies affirm things so to be, and venture to make them known, and yet confess they can not be known too?
A39573will you bind him to all the infants in Christendome, and barr him from doing any other infants in the world?
A39573will you gather Churches of Christ out of Churches of Christ what rule have you for that?
A39573would not this grate harshly upon charitable ears?
A39573would the water come up to them in the Chariot any sooner for sprinkling then for dipping?
A39573would the water have come up to them in the chariot any sooner for sprinkling then for dipping?
A39573yea is not preaching an administration to every creature that extends not to infants?
A39573yea who so blind as those that seem to themselves to be the onely Seers both for themselves and others?
A39573yea, when he asks who hath required this at your hands?
A39573yes no doubt, why then were they not broken off before?
A39573yet is it reckoned by you exclusive of infants, and why not Philips also?
A39573you know your people are not all in the faith, why else do you preach to them as prophane to the end you may convert them thereunto?
A39573your trivial new way, or rather no way of baptism?
A39573your very selves acknowledge you can not: if not, why more I wonder ad negationem spiritus?
A39573● … f you must keep so strictly to one and the same subject in circumcision, and baptism, why do you alter the subject your selves?