Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
A36830And this speech with the action was very common: Was I( said he to one John Wiggin) never in heaven?
A36830She said moreover unto him, Dost thou not know Katherine Wright?
A36830The next day hee returning from Walton homewards, she met him at the aforesaid pit, and asked him how he did?
A36830Wherefore did she send thee?
A36830Whether is she living or dead?
A86015Behold a man that hath told thee all things that ever thou didst, is not this Christ?
A86015William Dodding, and John Audland, and seeing me to go to that door, said, Whither wilt thou go?
A19860& which of their sences I praye you,& how manye of theire sences were deceaued, which tried their strenght with his?
A19860& whither was there not somthing els deceiued besids ther outward sences?
A19860( said he to one Iohn Wiggin) neuer in heauen?
A19860( say some) to fast from sinne?
A1986023],[ 1]; 106,[ 2] p. Imprinted[ by the English secret press?
A19860And a little after vt vero homines haec horreant, quis credat?
A19860And did not he gesse well as apeareth by the stories?
A19860And eyther make them more inexcusable, or els brynge them to a better minde?
A19860And in theire annotationes of the Rhomes testament, vpon these words of they disciples to Christ, why could not wee cast him out?
A19860And is not this the true faste?
A19860And what are we to learne out of these scriptures?
A19860And what letteth that we should not be perswaded hereof, and receiue it for a truth?
A19860And who that hath an eye to see with, seeth not, how heerein the deceuour deceaueth them mightely?
A19860Are there greate thinges to be looked vpon in this worke we speake of: euen by the testimony of Christ himselfe?
A19860Atheysts in England?
A19860But if one should haue done so, had he not spurned against the truth, and by consequence bene in great fault?
A19860But what are the meanes they vse in the dispossessinge of euill spirites?
A19860But what are those which are such true and in ● allable signes wherwith the signes set downe in the gospell are not to be compared?
A19860But what is more against sence then to ymagine and obiect that here?
A19860But what spirit possesseth these men, trow we?
A19860But why doth it seeme so incredible and impossible vnto some, for one to be nowe possest?
A19860Can his dilligence and watchfulnes be expressed, or the manifold assaltes and times wher in he so salteth vs be reckoned vp?
A19860Chap: yea among those which are not true signes, although they be so accounted by some?
A19860Do they thinke they coulde hang the diuel?
A19860For doth not nature it selfe teach vs, that theiris a certaine similitude& liknes betwene the the father and the child?
A19860For what meadicyne is soe soueraigne, as that which is of the Lords owne appoyntment?
A19860For where is he, euen of those that profese the feare of God, that doth in any measure so often perfourme this dutie and seruice to god as he shoulde?
A19860For who can assure vs that the diuel is in such a mā really, if the lord himself by his word doth it not?
A19860Hath he promised and will he not performe it?
A19860Hath he said and shall he not doe it?
A19860How then is it saide that sathan by his subtlety deceyueth all the world?
A19860How then say ● he Romanists and with what truth that hereticks to confirme their false faith can neuer doe any miracle?
A19860If it be euident that vpon these persons this worke of god hath bene wrought: who seeth not how contrary minded such are vnto Christ?
A19860If wee turne our eye eyther to God, or man: can wee chuse but reioyce and blesse God for such a worke?
A19860In these straits whither wil the Athists turne him?
A19860Is it not parte of the counsell of god, to the reuelation of all which wee are debtors?
A19860Is not this the fasting that god hath chosen to loose the bandes of wickednes, to take of the heauy burthen, and to let the oppressed goe free?
A19860Is there any better abstinence then this?
A19860Is there any disease of the body wherein men are so handled as these persons were?
A19860Know you not that thinges reuealed, belong only to vs and our children?
A19860Maye not one well saye, that prayer was the meaines whereby Sathan was cast out of her?
A19860Now I thinke Thyreus will not saye, that euery beleuer hath power to worke miracles, considering that of S Paule are all doers of miracle?
A19860Now who seeth not that Satan herein did but lye& deceiue?
A19860O Lord, how glorious are thy workes?
A19860Seinge then no hurte, but mnch good as we haue heard cometh by this worke, why shoulde any be offended with vs, for bearinge witnesse to this work?
A19860Shall it not then be much more effectuall to pacify gods wrath though kindled or broken out against vs, and moue him to be good and gratious vnto vs?
A19860Shall we say of them as it is said of our possessed persons in England that they were counterfeyts?
A19860She said moreouervnto hym Doest thou not knowe Katheryn Wright?
A19860The Lorde sayd somtime vnto Satan ” whenc comest thou?
A19860The said fit ended being demaunded what he had done ▪ as also what had bene don vnto him?
A19860These lusty gallāts who will haue no heauen, nor hell, no god, nor diuel what say they to this work of that god whome they deny?
A19860To what meanes now shall or can wee ascribe this health and dispossession of his ▪ but to thys holy exercyse?
A19860What is wightier then a kinge in his owne land?
A19860Wright, of Tho, Darling,& finally of they other 〈 ◊ 〉 persons wee haue so largly intreated off?
A19860],[ England?]
A19860and could this possiblie haue bene done but by this course I haue taken?
A19860and giue them occasion to sport themselues about our dispossession of deuils, as Thyreus doth full swetly concerning Luthers dipossessing?
A19860and hath he sp ● ken, and shall he not accomplish it?
A19860and must I washe also, and that in the poole of Sil ● am before I can see ● what vertue hathe that water aboue other waters?
A19860and not accordinge to the truth in other things?
A19860and that all those also in theire time we shall as certainely see fulfilled, as we haue alredy in part senee these?
A19860and that if it be certaine that the on of them hath such asicknes there is no doubt but that the other hath also the same?
A19860and why doe any stand vp and sett them selues against this worke indeuoringe to annihilat the same?
A19860and why may we not infer and conclude so in this our present case?
A19860are not other waters, and is not the water of the poole of Beth seda as good as that of Siloam?
A19860are not yee( saith he) my worke in the Lord?
A19860art thou come hither to torment vs before the tyme?
A19860art thou come to deflroy vs?
A19860but I now perceiu it is otherwise as al his power, wherby it is saied he doth suche greate workes, com to this?
A19860can theire any naturall cause be giuen of them?
A19860canst thou not shed teares?
A19860could not Elisha, if he had pleased, as well haue healed, Naaman of his leprosie, by his worde alone, as haue smitten, Gehazi his seruant ther with?
A19860doe not such doe them as great apleasure theirin as posible men can?
A19860for the deliuerance of the church from the affliction& danger it is in at this time?
A19860haue all the giftes of heal inge?
A19860horrebit forsitan christianus homo, si psalmum Miserere, vel dicat, vel dici audiat& c. That men should be afrayd of these things, who can beleeue?
A19860howe can it otherwise be but that he is reposessed?
A19860must he not nedes be cōfounded in himselfe?
A19860must it not needes then be some supernaturall disease?
A19860or can it be otherwise but that the diuil is entred into him and he spiritualy possessed with the deuil, if now he perceiue not that there is a deuil?
A19860or is there any thing in nature that might send forth such effects?
A19860or so much as an heare of, one of there heades perished?
A19860said a little before the spirits egresse, I am hott, I must goe, I must away, I can not tarry, whither shall I goe?
A19860shall we now saye he seemed to fome, but did not fome?
A19860she met him at the aforesaid pyt, and asked him how he did?
A19860should I then haue done well to let them alone?
A19860swepte, and garnished he would neuer deny the work of god which hath benshewed on him?
A19860that I should obey him?
A19860that mine eyes must be annointed and that with clay, which if I had my sight, would rather put it out then helpe to re store sighte to the blinde?
A19860the sinne of this time?
A19860thou talkest about things which nothing concerne thee, can not the very sight terrifie the sufficiently,& drawe thee to som compassion and pittie?
A19860vvho can chuse but loue him because of his mercies?
A19860was I?
A19860was ther euer any man hearde of, who indewed or guifted of God to worke one only kinde of miracle, and had no guifte or power to effect any other?
A19860what purginge can these thy horrible sinnes receiue?
A19860wherfore did shee send thee?
A19860whervpon one of them in her fit said ah Edmond dost thou trouble her nowe when she shold testify against thee?
A19860whether is shee liuyng or dead?
A19860whē thou seest thy brethrē present before thee in so ma- many bonds?
A19860who knoweth whether thou art com to the kyngdom for such a time?
A19860who should fast if not these?
A19860who will doubt but that the trembling and the blasphemyes which are heard, do be wray the dyuels lying hid in men?
A19860who wyll not saye, that thes two haue the same disease?
A19860why then require you any more?
A19860will a christian man tremble, yf he either say the psalme( called) Miserere, or heare it said?
A19860yea who is so simple that by these few wordes seeth not, that the ceasing of myracles proueth not the ceasing of possession by diuels?
A19860yf he rehearse the lords prayer, or any other that is godly?
A19860yf he see or touch reliques of the saints?
A19860yf in his presence exorcismes be read?
A200011 Whether now( in this last age of the world) there be essentiall possessions and dispossessions of Diuels?
A2000110 Whether Master Darel his pretended patients, were essentiallie possest with a Diuell?
A200012 Whether sole Prayer and Fasting be an vndoubted true ordinance of Christ, for the powerfull expelling of Diuels to the ende of the world?
A200013 Whether( if any be truely dispossessed by sole prayer and fasting) that selfesame dispossession be not indeed a miraculous worke?
A200014 Whether the working of miracles be yet still in vse in these daies of the Gospell?
A20001A reasonable man say you?
A20001Againe, are not all men( how different soeuer in the doing of mischiefe) of one and the selfe same kind?
A20001And he that knoweth not Christ, what faith or hope hath he in Christ?
A20001And is not the cure thereof eyther ordinarie: or extraordinarie at least?
A20001And onely are spirits or diuels distinguished into their seuerall kinds?
A20001And we also vnderstand it of such a faith: but what then?
A20001And what names doe properly import their office?
A20001And, what say you to the other part?
A20001Are these the supernaturall actions or passions: from whence you so confidently conclude your essentiall possessions of spirits and diuels?
A20001Be it so as you say: but what is your iudgement concerning the third?
A20001Behold Exorcistes?
A20001But go to, do tell vs I pray you, whether essentiall possessings, and actuall bewitchings be not both of them supernaturall diseases?
A20001But goe to man, doe tell vs I beseech you; how many distinct orders of spirits and diuels are establisht in hell?
A20001But goe to then, how answere you this?
A20001But goe to, admitte( by the way) your argument were currant in euery point, which will neuer be proued: what then?
A20001But goe to, how are you certainly sure, that praier and fasting is a meanes ordeined by God himselfe: to that selfe same ende?
A20001But goe to, sith faith( as you say now) is required in that action; what manner of faith doe you meane?
A20001But how dare you thus boldlie aduenture to giue these variable aduises, without any warrant from scripture?
A20001But in the meane time, what became of your appointed rules?
A20001But sir, how are you sure the miraculous faith was giuen the Apostles without any meanes?
A20001But sir?
A20001But sir?
A20001But sir?
A20001But tell me I beseech you, what spirit you are of?
A20001But tell me good Exorcistes, doe these the outragious outgoings of your vnrulie affections: proceede from the spirit of God, or the Diuell?
A20001But tell me( I pray you) doth the Lord inspire the miraculous faith into the mindes of some, by his onely immediate spirit?
A20001But what might be the reason of such your sodaine Apostasie concerning this point?
A20001But what saith Exorcistes to all these matters?
A20001But what saith Exorcistes vnto them?
A20001But what say you first to those my three late published treatises: which you so scornefully brand with the odious title of factious Pamphlets?
A20001But what?
A20001But wherein will they not very fitlie resemble Sulpitius, a man fearefully confect in all kind of mischiefe?
A20001But whether is it a naturall: or supernaturall disease?
A20001But who( I beseech you) propounded the question?
A20001But, be it supposed he spake in such sort as you say: doth that argue necessarily some diuel in his bellie?
A20001But, be it supposed there were now as great causes of such a wonderfull iudgement as euer before, what then?
A20001But, goe to now: fast or loose, for a shilling?
A20001But, who euer before now hath heard any speech of the diuell his white foame?
A20001But, why seemes it incredible there should be essentiall possessions: in these daies of the Gospell?
A20001Come on therefore Exorcistes: what say you now, to the essentiall possession of Spirits and Diuels?
A20001Could Peter denie his master Christ, and not denie his faith and hope in Christ?
A20001Darling, of W. Sommers, and of those seuen also in Lancashire: if you had no Scripture to warrant the vndertaking of any such course?
A20001Death, where is now thy power?
A20001Doe tell vs( I beseech you) how you became( on the suddaine) so familiarlie acquainted with the Diuell his earnest desire of a repossession?
A20001Doe you aske me, what then?
A20001Doe you feele your selfe no lesse readie, than willing: to aduenture the combate afresh?
A20001Doest thou enquire( saith hee) the name of this Angelicall nature?
A20001EXorcistes?
A20001Exorcistes?
A20001Fie, fie Exorcistes, doe you not tremble to vtter such an vngodlie and blasphemous conceit of your owne?
A20001For how proue you those your eight pretended Demoniakes, to be in such sort possessed: as you beare vs in hand they were?
A20001For tell me I beseech you, are not all the holy Angels( how glorious soeuer) of one and the selfe same kinde?
A20001For tell me I pray you, hath the sound of an harpe any force at all to expell a diuell essentiallie inherent in any mans bodie?
A20001For then, what needed their corruptible bodies to put incorruption vpon them, or themselues desire to be dissolued and to be with Christ?
A20001For what fruit may you haue of that whereof you are now so filthilie ashamed, that you dare not shew forth your face as in former times?
A20001For what learned Phisition hath euer affirmed, that a pleurisie can not otherwaies be possiblie cured, but by the onlie vse of Phlebotomie?
A20001For what needes an experiment first by prayer alone: sith prayer and fasting together wil strike it dead?
A20001For what other thing else do they set forth to sale, but such fuming smoke, as is readie to breake forth into dangerous firie flames?
A20001For what though he be dayly assaulting, suggesting, and tempting?
A20001For who euer auouched the only possession of diuels to be simplie a miracle?
A20001For who( but an impudent person) would not be highlie ashamed of the ignorance of his owne soule?
A20001For why?
A20001For, did Abrahams prayer get Abimelechs women with child: or the Israelites fasting conquer the Beniamites?
A20001For, how could that man possiblie haue a spirit of an vncleane diuell: vnlesse the said Spirit were essentiallie in him?
A20001For, who euer taught him how to dispose of any his iudiciall proceedings with the sonnes of Adam?
A20001Goe to now Exorcistes, what say you to these and the like exceptions against that your precedent inuincible argument?
A20001How are you certaine hereof?
A20001How know you for certaine, that hee is( in deede and in truth) so senselesse, as you beare vs in hand?
A20001How know you, that Christ noteth therein: such a distinct order of diuels differing from others?
A20001How long is it since thy sonne hath had essentiallie a diuell within him?
A20001How now Exorcistes, here is Pythagoras against Pythagoras: who I beseech you, shall be vmpier betweene them?
A20001How therfore are you able( from al, or any one of these places) to conclude a Diuell essentiallie inherent in the bodie of the Child?
A20001Howbeit sir?
A20001Howbeit, consider by the way what a deadlie blow his answerelesse answere doth giue to whatsoeuer you hold?
A20001Howbeit, if( in very deed) you be not ashamed thereof from your heart: why then doe you thus hide your head in a corner?
A20001Howbeit, what might be that great good( I beseech you) which their said affliction shall procure to their soules?
A20001If I say, we should argue on this sort( a posse, ad esse) would you not forthwith conclude great childishnes in vs?
A20001If notwithstanding all this, you wil needs haue your sequele canonized currant; then how answere you this?
A20001If those seuerall names do signifie no seuerall orders of Angels, why then were they bestowed vpon them?
A20001Is it not more then audacious impudencie, thus presumptuouslie to determine a certaine course, in any such doubtfull vncertainties?
A20001Know you not man, that wee are to pray onely in faith without any doubting, and that faith it selfe must needes haue a ground from the written word?
A20001Know you not who it is that the father( in these last dayes) hath finallie appointed to reueale, and to speake all truthes to his Church?
A20001Know you not( good brother) that the things reuealed belong onely to vs, and our children?
A20001Must wee therefore beleeue that the diuell in deed, runneth hither and thither; as a bellowing Bull, that seeketh for pasture?
A20001Nay rather, why should we not boldlie conclude the quite contrarie?
A20001Nay, who seeth not the same to be a very phantasticall and friuolous order?
A20001No such possessions at all in Israell?
A20001Notwithstanding, how knew you so fitlie what kind they were of: before you had giuen the first onset vpon them?
A20001Notwithstanding, what was the aduice you gaue?
A20001Or what danger may possiblie befall the Church of God, by imbracing the same for a truth, it being so indeed?
A20001Or, how can you imagine any essentiall dispossession of diuels: from the Iewes their present desisting from sinne?
A20001Orthodoxus Exorcistes?
A20001Otherwaies, what vse of a medicine: where there is no meanes at all to discerne of the maladie?
A20001Philologus?
A20001Physiologus?
A20001Quantum muta ● us ab illo?
A20001This you see is your argument: and now I aske you, not what boy, but what Bedlem would thus dispute?
A20001Thou didst blow thy fingers euen now, to warme them withall: but I pray thee, for what purpose dost thou now blow thy pottage?
A20001To whom was the question propounded?
A20001To whome was this answere propely giuen?
A20001Very true as you say: and what one inconuenience I pray you, in holding so?
A20001Very well: and what are those other vses( I pray you) which respect some other besides?
A20001Very well: and what are those other( I pray you) which more respectiuely apper ● aine vnto men?
A20001Well sir, and what is the other?
A20001Well sir, you are welcome vnto vs. And therefore, what say you man?
A20001Well, but what say you to this?
A20001Well; what say you then to the other of my treatises?
A20001Were not this pockie good stuffe( think you) to pester your Pulpit withall?
A20001What are those vses( I pray you) which more speciallie concerne the affectors thereof?
A20001What doth Christ his answere implie?
A20001What great blasphemie is this against our Lord Iesus the Churches sole Prophet?
A20001What inconuenience could follow thereof: if happilie I reasoned so?
A20001What is one, to begin with?
A20001What man?
A20001What man?
A20001What man?
A20001What names( I pray you) respect only their nature?
A20001What skils it how the Diuell entred into them: sith it is apparantly euident, they were all essentiallie possessed?
A20001What then?
A20001What was the answere of Christ to their question?
A20001What was the maine reason of propounding the question?
A20001What?
A20001Where is your warrant, so vnreuerently to rayle vpon, reuile, and speake euill of any in authoritie?
A20001Wherein our Sauiour sayth not, how long hath thy sonne beene possessed: but rather, how long hath thy sonne been thus handled?
A20001Which doe generally appertaine to all?
A20001Whither will not the height of your pride procure your vnrulie penne?
A20001Who( being well in his wits) will euer denie the same?
A20001Why man, what more profit might grow to the people of God: by vsing them rather as signes, then as meanes of those their miraculous actions?
A20001Why man?
A20001Why sir?
A20001Why sir?
A20001Why sir?
A20001Why sir?
A20001Why sir?
A20001Why sir?
A20001Why sir?
A20001Why this?
A20001Will you leaue the law, and the testimonies, and trot after a blind and a trothlesse lad for the reuelation of these hidden truthes?
A20001Will you returne from the author of truth; to the author of lyes?
A20001Will you sticke fast to this sense, which you presentlie make of that scripture?
A20001Would you gladly bee made to perceiue this mysticall point?
A20001Wouldest thou know the office?
A20001Yea( quoth the Farmer) can there come out of thy mouth, both heate and colde at a clap?
A20001Yea, and( which more is) must we vndoubtedly conclude, that he was therefore possest with a diuell, because he felt not the pricking with pins?
A20001Yea, but how are you certaine the Boy is( in deed and in truth) essentially possessed of Satan?
A20001and how was this your prescribed order obserued therein?
A20001and not rather some such supernaturall matter, as was only, and at all times miraculouslie cured?
A20001and wherein( I pray you) consisted the worke of your hands?
A20001art thou come hither to torment me before the time?
A20001doe you marke Exorcistes his speech?
A20001essentiallie inherent within the diuell: but, rather the contrarie?
A20001from the holy ministrie of God; to an extraordinarie ministerie of the diuel and his diuellish instrument?
A20001how doth this conclude your supposed essentiall possessions now, in these daies of the Gospell?
A20001or can there be greater infidelitie, then flatly to denie the sonne of God?
A20001or hath he appointed no ordinarie meanes at all, whereby his said spirit may engraue, or beget that selfesame faith in their hearts?
A20001or that the Lord hath appointed no meanes at all, for the begetting thereof?
A20001sinne, where is now thy sting?
A20001sith, the miraculous expelling of spirits and diuels, had beene in euerie age of the world, euen equallie admirable, straunge and most meruellous?
A20001therefore he doth now also inflict the same vpon some?
A20001what though he rageth howrely like a cruell red Dragon: and goeth continuallie about like a ramping and roaring Lion to deuoure thee?
A20001what though he seeke dayly to fanne and to winnowe thee, as men winnow wheate?
A20001yea Satan, where is now thy actuall dominion ouer our bodies?
A20001yea, admit he doth eft soones trip vp thy heeles at vnwares, and giue thee a fearefull fall?