Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier	question
A64365	And how, I pray, is there here an Universal drawn from a Particular?
A30335	And why are the Roman Catholicks at so much Pains to have the Test repealed?
A30335	If Transubstantiation is only a Philosophical Nicety concerning the manner of the Presence, where is the hurt of renouncing it?
A86378	And how can or why should that which is most absolutely perfect, be reiterated?
A86378	Deny it?
A86378	Hitherto the Doctor in his allegation of Irenaeus; But is any man so weak as from hence to inferre a Sacrifice properly so called?
A86378	M. An fuit instituta a Christo coena ut Deo Patri hostia pro peccatis expiandis immolaretur?
A86378	What are Churches, but his families?
A86378	or why were the legall Sacrifices of the Jewish Synagogue so oft repeated, but because they were not perfect?
A02398	Also doe not the Scriptures expresly say, That the Heauens must containe him till all things bee restored?
A02398	And that He shall so descend from heauen; as Hee first ascended vp into heauen?
A02398	For first, concerning the Scripture, does not that euery where tell vs, That our Sauiour was in euery point like a man?
A02398	For what is his created Word, but the faculties of Sense& Reason?
A02398	Fulgentius thus; How did He goe vp to heauen but as he is very man, contained in a place?
A02398	Is not therein the Word of God blasphemed?
A02398	Or how is Hee present with the faithfull, but as He is very God without all measure?
A02398	Paschasius thus; What finde they which taste these things, beside bread and wine, otherwise than by faith and hearing?
A02398	That He had the face, limbs, and properties of a man?
A02398	That Hee did eat, drinke, and speake like a man?
A59787	( g) For what?
A59787	And what can be urg''d more against us in respect of Transubstantiation?
A59787	But are these the true and only Grounds of the Doctrine of that Holy Mystery?
A59787	But, Sir, to be short, What relation has this to the present Parallel of the Trinity and Transubstantiation?
A59787	Convert, Do n''t you believe the Doctrine of the Trinity?
A59787	Say you so, my Friend, then why must I believe the Trinity?
A59787	The Sacramental Body of Christ is cloathed with the Species of Bread, is it so in Heaven too?
A59787	for not believing Transubstantiation as well as the Trinity?
A59787	if not, how is the same Body at the same time, with and without the Species of Bread?
A59787	what if I will believe neither?
A51288	Again, How does it appear that this promise of the assistance of the Holy Ghost is not conditional?
A51288	And then presently upon the Iews striving amongst themselves and saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat?
A51288	Besides, did Christ''s Body at his last Supper so soon as he had Transubstantiated the Bread into it, lose all extension of parts?
A51288	But is this colour enough for the Church of Rome''s Determination to be stood to?
A51288	But why is not the Cup the Bloud or Covenant in Christ''s Bloud?
A51288	For if all be swallowed, what is there left of the man for it to be swallowed into, but a mere point or rather nothing?
A51288	How can this man give us his flesh to eat?
A51288	How could there be hands and feet and organization of parts, either at the Table or on the Cross, if there were no extension of parts to be organized?
A51288	In the Answer to a former Question, Why was the Sacrament of the Lord''s Supper ordained?
A51288	The Bread which we break, is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ?
A51288	The Cup of Blessing which we bless, is it not the Communion of the Blood of Christ?
A51288	Touching which in the Answer to the Question, What are the Benefits whereof we are made partakers thereby?
A51288	What is this but the appealing to the truth of sense by our Saviour himself?
A51288	What then filled out his cloaths as he sat with his Disciples at Table?
A51288	When Iesus knew in himself, that his Disciples murmured at it, He said unto them, Does this offend you?
A51288	or how could the Jews lay hold on Christ''s Body to Crucifie it, if he had no extension of parts to be laid hold on?
A62557	* And he said unto them, why are ye troubled?
A62557	And what can any man do more unworthily towards his Friend?
A62557	And what if after all Transubstantiation, if it were possible and actually wrought by the Priest, would yet be no Miracle?
A62557	But what says the Catholique Orthodoxus to this?
A62557	How can he possibly use him more barbarously, than to feast upon his living flesh and bloud?
A62557	Is it a necessary and conclusive Argument or not?
A62557	The Case of mixt Communion: Whether it be Lawfull to Separate from a Church upon the account of promiscuous Congregations and mixt Communions?
A62557	The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion of the bloud of Christ?
A62557	What endless triumphs would they have made upon this Subject?
A62557	Whether any man have, or ever had greater evidence of the truth of any Divine Revelation than every man hath of the falshood of Transubstantiation?
A62557	and why do thoughts arise in your hearts?
A62557	nor so much as ask our Saviour, how can these things be?
A62557	the bread which we break, is it not the communion of the body of Christ?
A46941	& c. Do ye not know that Reason must judg of the Sum of Religion?
A46941	''T is true, he commanded his Disciples to repeat the same Action, and to do as he had done; But where did he bid the Priest to personate him?
A46941	26. is the Sign, or Sacrament, or Memorial of his Body?
A46941	A Contemptible Crumb of Dough, which is Kneaded, and Baked, and Crossed, and Muttered into the most High God, God over all, Blessed for evermore?
A46941	And as St. Paul speaks in another Case, Do ye not know that the Saints shall judg the World?
A46941	And if the whole must be judged by it, Is it unworthy to judg in the smallest Matters, such as a Phrase, or a Figure?
A46941	And is it not likewise a neat turn, to quiet them with his Doctrine of the Superficies?
A46941	And is it nothing for the Great God of Heaven to be used in a more reproachful manner?
A46941	And then besides, what would the Infidel world say, if they saw you devouring your Lord, and eating him up in his own shape?
A46941	And was not this a pleasant way of proceeding?
A46941	But I ask again, Have we any more than the most convincing Reasons, to persuade us that there is any such Person thus qualified?
A46941	But can we possibly behold Hands and Feet in a Wafer?
A46941	But how does the Nicene Council answer it?
A46941	But what they then cried out and said to the Lycaonians, Sirs, why do ye these things?
A46941	Can we handle and see flesh and bones in it?
A46941	For what has Omnipotency to do with nothing?
A46941	Is this the Literal Sense and proper Meaning of na Organized Human Body, That it has no Magnitude, and is neither Little nor Big?
A46941	Or that this Infinitely Credible and Adorable Being has given any Testimony at all?
A46941	Shall it not judg in so plain and so easie a Case as this?
A46941	Shall that Nonsense and Inconsistency, which it is a very Great Imperfection even in Imperfect Creatures to Affirm, be a Perfection to make?
A46941	Sirs, why do ye these things?
A46941	The Question therefore in short is this, What he did to the bread, when he said, This is my Body?
A46941	The Virgin Mary scrupled the Possibility of her being a Mother when she knew not a Man, and asked, How this thing could be?
A46941	What is it that so fēelingly moves our Senses, and resists our Touch, but a Body or Material Substance?
A46941	Whether he Metamorphosed and changed the nature of it?
A36765	( speaks thus) What is the Bread?
A36765	11. saith, The figure of the Sea, figura Maris; What more can this signify, but the Sea which is the figure?
A36765	87. he saith, Where would Jesus Christ be known?
A36765	Are they Accidents?
A36765	Can it be said that one doth bite the true Body of Jesus Christ, and that one breaks off part of it?
A36765	Can one say, that one sees that the Bread is what''t was before, if the Communicant receives no substance?
A36765	How is it that communicating, one is partaker of what Melchisedeck offer''d, if in communicating, one do not receive neither Bread, nor Wine?
A36765	How is it that the Sacrifice of Christians, is to eat Bread, if the Bread do not remain?
A36765	In the same place, How is it that the Bread is made the Body of Jesus Christ, and the Wine and Water his Blood?
A36765	In what sense can it be understood that one receives several parts or parcels in the Eucharist?
A36765	Now if the Bread were the real Body of Jesus Christ, wherefore should S. Anstin observe that all called it the Body of Jesus Christ?
A36765	Now the Communicant, can he receive a corporal Substance?
A36765	Now to what end were it to call the Eucharist a Sacrament of Bread and Wine, if there did not remain Bread and Wine after Consecration?
A36765	Now what is this holy Food?
A36765	Now who doth not see that this can not be spoken but of the Bread, figuratively and improperly called the Body of Jesus Christ?
A36765	Or who can think it possible to be done, that that which is in a Subject should remain, the Subject it self ceasing to be?
A36765	The same Father on these words of the First to the Corinthians, The Bread which we break is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ?
A36765	What becomes of them which receive it?
A36765	What can reconcile what you demand?
A36765	What else doth this import, but the Circumcision which is the sign?
A36765	What is this Bread, whereof one receives one Portion, and another, another Part?
A36765	When Tertullian de Baptismo, calls Baptism Sacramentum aquae nostrae: What else can that mean, but our Water which is a Sacrament?
A36765	When it is frequently said, the Sacrament of the Eucharist, what else can that import, but the Eucharist which is a Sacrament?
A36765	for what means this manner of speech, the Sacrament of Bread and Wine, but the Bread and Wine which is the Sacrament?
A36765	these things, my Brethren, are called Sacraments, because one thing is seen in them, and another thing is understood by them?
A34612	And fill the world with ruine and with grief?
A34612	And why doth he own that the manner is spiritual, not carnal, and then require a carnal presence, as to the manner it self?
A34612	Can any thing more clear be said?
A34612	For how could the Council of Florence approve that Decree which was made more than three months after it was ended?
A34612	For how many men could his body have fed, that the whole world should be nourished by it?
A34612	For what is there visible in its outside but only the substance of the Wine?
A34612	For( saith Cardinal Bellarmine) what power is there required to do nothing?
A34612	How have I hitherto said Mass?
A34612	How much do we comply with humane pride, and curiosity, which would seem to understand all things ▪ Where is the danger?
A34612	How much easier had it been at one stroke to blot out the whole Book?
A34612	Now, who is there, even among the Maintainers of Transubstantiation, that will understand this, not much, but a little, of the Body of Christ?
A34612	O dreadful day, why didst thou play the Thief?
A34612	Or did Christ say concerning the accidents of the Bread and Wine, these accidents are, or this accident is my body?
A34612	Or if a Dog or a Hog should swallow down the Consecrated Host whole, whether the Lords Body should pass into their belly together with the accidents?
A34612	Or whether Worms be gendred, or Mice nourished of accidents?
A34612	Or who can believe that the Nicene Fathers would call his Body and Bloud Symbols in a proper sense?
A34612	They ask concerning the accidents, whether the Body of Christ be under them when they are abstracted from their subject?
A34612	This we are therefore to declare, how can that which is bread be also the body of Christ?
A34612	Thou thy self wert, but wert the old man, but being baptized, thou art now become a new Creature?
A34612	What is there, can refute more expresly the dream of Transubstantiation?
A34612	What is this, but, as Arnobius said against the Heathen, to intercept publick Records, and fear the Testimoy of the Truth?
A34612	What patch then will they sow to amend this in Bertram?
A34612	Whether such Hosts cease to be the Body of Christ?
A34612	Whether the Mice( who sometimes feast upon the Hosts when they are not well shut up) eat the Body of Christ it self?
A34612	Whether, what the Faithful eat in the Church, be made the Body and Bloud of Christ in Figure and in Mystery?
A34612	Who but the infamous Heretick Eutyches would say that Christ, as God, was substantially changed into man, or as man, into God?
A41629	And if our curious Inquirers shall further ask; how this can be, since the accidents or outward species of Bread still remain?
A41629	And now who is it that abuseth the senses, the Author, or Catholics?
A41629	Did not our Lord plainly read in the minds of his Disciples, that, by the Cup, they would understand, that which was contained in the Cup?
A41629	Dim sighted Reason will ask, how this can be, since it is against the Nature of a Body to be in two places at the same time?
A41629	How can this Man give us his flesh to eat?
A41629	I desire them to resolve these Questions: How a thousand species can be reflected from the same Glass at once, to a thousand Eyes at the same time?
A41629	If any one should advise the Author, when he is thirsty, to drink off his Glass, would he be so inconsiderate as to swallow it together with the Wine?
A41629	It shall come to pass, when your Children shall say unto you, what mean you by this service?
A41629	Shall they therefore be hindred from taking immediate Possession of what is thus made over to them?
A41629	The Bread which we break, is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ?
A41629	The Bread which we break, is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ?
A41629	The Cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the Communion of the Blood of Christ?
A41629	The Cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the Communion of the Blood of Christ?
A41629	The Existence of the Body of Christ and the Conversion of the Bread into it: And what is this but Transubstantiation?
A41629	What and if ye shall see the Son of Man ascend up where he was before?
A41629	Why then may we not likewise conclude from hence, that, that which Christ gave to his Disciples, when he said, This is my Body, was really his Body?
A41629	nor so much as ask our Saviour, how can these things be?
A41629	nor so much as ask our Saviour, how can these things be?
A41629	not in express words, yet following Reason as their Guide( and what is this but necessary rational deduction?)
A41629	or that our Saviour the true Guid, and greatest Lover of Souls, or any of his Apostles after him, should never have given any Explanation of them?
A30889	And do''st thou still say, thou doubt''st, whether the Body, which is in Heaven, can be also on Earth?
A30889	But come on: What do you object against us?
A30889	But what, if we should say, that these Places, you object against us, are to be interpreted by those, we have alledg''d?
A30889	But why can not he, who fram''d our Nature, change also its Laws?
A30889	Do they think that CHRIST contradicted himselfe?
A30889	Does the Word offend them?
A30889	For tell me, O Sectary, canst thou really receive CHRIST''s Body, and CHRIST not be really present?
A30889	For what hinders our Bodies, that they can not be at once in several places?
A30889	How often do we beg of GOD the Father, that this Bread may be to us not a pledge of Death, but of Glory?
A30889	How often do we desire, that not only the Eating, but the Effect of this Bread may be granted us?
A30889	Is it not the condition of our Nature?
A30889	Is it probable, that there was then no Church in the World, which had a right Belief of this Sacrament?
A30889	Is it so?
A30889	Is it then to no purpose, that we hear these Words so carefully repeated: When the Doors were shut: The Doors being shut?
A30889	Is not the reason and strength of the Argument the same?
A30889	Now what can be more express than these words of his in his Sermon on our Lords Supper?
A30889	Now what doest thou mean by these words?
A30889	Now what is their Complaint against Transubstantiation?
A30889	Now, I ask, Sectary, if Pope Innocent deliver''d this Faith to us, who deliver''d it to the Greeks?
A30889	Or must we think, the Spirit of Truth resides in you, who in this so great Affair contest more fiercely with one another, than with Us?
A30889	Or the Thing, that is signify''d by this Word?
A30889	Or will they deny it to have been always believ''d in the Church, that CHRIST''s Flesh profiteth the Receiver?
A30889	Our Lord''s Body can be at one time in two several places: And if in two, why not in Infinite?
A30889	Shouldst thou never so Seriously fix thy Thoughts on Rome, or on Hierusalem; couldst thou be therefore said to be really at Rome, or in Hierusalem?
A30889	Thou then being only on Earth, and he only in Heaven, how can his Body really come to thee?
A30889	To what end did St. John use these Words, but to signify CHRIST''s miraculous Entrance, at which himself was present?
A30889	Was not the Holy Trinity believ''d to be Homousian or Consubstantial, before the Word Homousian was ever taken up?
A30889	What if we deny, that you have any more Right to expound them, than we?
A30889	What madness is it in thee, not to Adore CHRIST, wherever he is; who, wherever he is, is GOD, the Disposer of thy Life, and Judge of thy Soul?
A30889	What needs many Words?
A30889	What then?
A30889	Why then dost thou with so great Boldness and Fury inveigh against it?
A30889	Why then may we not be believ''d to think with those, with whom we speak?
A30889	Wilt thou say, that thy Soul by Faith flies up into Heaven, and is there really Fed with this Holy Food?
A30889	You require those, that are more Antient than St. Augustin?
A30889	seeing these things, can with his weak understanding search out a possibility of the Reason?
A30412	A Person, whose Name I know not, but shall henceforth mark him N. N. asked what M. B. meant, by Faith only?
A30412	All the wonders of the Prophets and Apostles were but sorry matters to it: What was Moses calling fo ● Manna from Heaven and Water fromm the Rock?
A30412	And is not Grace able to build them up, and make them perfect in every good Word and Work?
A30412	And then he proposes the Objection, how that could be?
A30412	And yet how does Sin and Vice abound in the World?
A30412	But we desire to know what they think can be meant by these Words?
A30412	D. S. asked him if we received Christ''s Body and Blood by our Senses?
A30412	D. S. asked which of the senses, his Taste, or Touch, or Sight, for that seemed strange to him?
A30412	D. S. said, He wondered to hear him speak so: Were not the Greek, the Armenian, the Nestorian, and the Abissen Churches separated from the Roman?
A30412	Did ever Man in his Wits argue in this fashion?
A30412	Does not the Gospel offer Grace to all Men to lead holy Lives, following the Commandments of God?
A30412	Elijah''s bringing sometimes Fire and sometimes Rain from Heaven?
A30412	From the Sixth Century downward what a race of Men have the Popes been?
A30412	He asks how it was to be called after the Sanctification?
A30412	How comes it then that for the first seven Ages there were no Heresies nor Hereticks about this?
A30412	How many imaginary difficulties may one imagine might have obstructed the changing this Custom?
A30412	How shall he satisfie those that interrogate him, or defend that which is written?
A30412	In the end, when the Council had passed their Decree, does the method of their dispute alter?
A30412	Is it not then a strange choice?
A30412	Is there not then here a clear change?
A30412	M. C. asked, why he called them so then?
A30412	M. C. said, Then will you acknowledge that before that Oath was imposed the Pope was to be acknowledged?
A30412	M. W. said, Did not the Greek Church reconcile it self to the Roman Church at the Council of Florence?
A30412	One would expect to hear of tumults and stirs, and an universal conspiracy of all men to save this Right of their Children?
A30412	S. P. T. said, Did not King Lucius write to the Pope upon his receiving the Christian Faith?
A30412	Then he asks, where it was written, That the Son was like the Father in his Essence?
A30412	This did, as it was no wonder, startle the Jews, so they murmured, and said, How can this Man give us his Flesh to eat?
A30412	We know the pompous Objection against this, is, How comes it then that there are so many Errors and Divisions among Christians?
A30412	What are they made who take it?
A30412	Whom had they blame for all this but themselves?
A30412	Would they have men changed into the nature of bruits?
A30412	especially those that pretend the greatest Acquaintance with Scriptures?
A30412	on these Words, The Bread which we brake, is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ?
A30412	or was this any thing but what would have been certainly done in the gentlest and mildest government upon earth?
A30412	says, What is the Bread?
A30412	what ● ● re the Apostles raising the dead, giving sight to the blind, and feet to the lanie?
A30412	where shall he find a fit answer?
A60427	Again, I would ask, whose are this whitness, and hardness, and roundness, and coldness?
A60427	Again, thou hast an Obligation in thy hand, and I ask thee what hast thou there?
A60427	Again, why do they say in receiving this Sacrament, ever since the Primitive Church, Lift up your Hearts, if they have all in their Mouths?
A60427	And if that we acknowledg all things from God, yet we do like Lot, Is it not a little one,( saith he) when he craved to go unto Zoar?
A60427	Beside I ask them to whom Christ spake when he said, This is my Body?
A60427	But how shall we trim it?
A60427	But if his body were upon Earth, as they say, should we handle it, and touch it, now it is glorified?
A60427	But if you ask how this is?
A60427	But what night?
A60427	Canst thou avouch Transubstantiation more flatly then they deny it?
A60427	Did Christ command you to do more than he did, and not do as he did?
A60427	Do they think to hem Christ in their Mass, and shut his ordinance out of their Mass?
A60427	For which the Lord complaineth, saying: I have loved you, yet ye say, wherein hast thou loved us?
A60427	How can every one of us eat his body, and yet he hath but one body, and that body is whole when we eat it?
A60427	How had this Heresy bin chased, if the divel had hatched it in their time?
A60427	How is it then, that some regard their other Garments more ● ● an this?
A60427	If his body be like ours( as he saith) how can it be eaten, and be there, for ours can not?
A60427	If it be Bread all this while, when he did take it, and bless it, and break it, and gave it, and they did eat it, when is it turned into his Body?
A60427	If the Bread be not his Body, why doth he call it his Body?
A60427	If( say they) the Bread and Wine be not changed into his Body and Blood, why doth he speak so darkly?
A60427	Is this the Church which can not err?
A60427	Is this the Papists union with Christ?
A60427	Is this the manner whereby we are made one Flesh with Christ, to eat his flesh?
A60427	Many nights did he spend in watching and praying for us; and is there a night now for us to betray him?
A60427	Mark then, and we will loose it as well as we can: He saith, This is my Body: as he saith after, which is broken for you: Why?
A60427	Must the Sun needs come to us, or else can not his heat and light profit us?
A60427	Nay this would have required more words, and made them come again; with Master, what is the meaning?
A60427	Oh the goodliest Testament that ever was made, for it bringeth to us the remissions of sins: it is such a matter to forgive sins?
A60427	Our sins are infinite,& God is infinite: but our Works are finite in number& measure?
A60427	Paul saith, Jesus took Bread: well then; yet it is Bread: when he had taken it, then he blessed it; what did he bless?
A60427	So in Doctrines we should think, whether it be meet to believe God or Men?
A60427	Tell us Papist, do not these Fathers speak as plain as we?
A60427	The Disciples of Christ said, Master, Is it I?
A60427	The Disciples of John asked, Master, what shall we doe?
A60427	Therefore if my heart tell me that I do love God, whom shall I believe before my self?
A60427	Therefore who but Antichrist durst deprave it?
A60427	Therefore, as in manners, we should think of Peter''s saying, Whether is it meet to obey God or Men?
A60427	Thirdly, it is said, until he come; if he be to come, then he is not come: If he be come, how can we say, untill he come?
A60427	Thou art a private man and hast a private examination, therefore let thy question be, What have I done?
A60427	To end this controversy, here we may say as the Disciples said to Christ, Whither shall we go from thee?
A60427	What a dark, and strange, and intricate, and incredible speech had this been for them to understand grosly, and literally?
A60427	What grace, what favour, what mercy, now to pardon thee all this, and save thy life, and set thee at liberty, as though thou hadst never offended?
A60427	What need he which was God, give thanks to God, but to shew us what we should do when we eat our selves?
A60427	What then, is there nothing in the Sacrament but Bread and Wine, like an hungry nunscion?
A60427	What then, this is a poor and weak Testament, which gave nothing?
A60427	When Christ commeth to our house, shall we not look whether our Chamber be trimmed, as the chamber was trimmed against his coming to the Passover?
A60427	When Jehonadab came to Jehu his Chariot, he said, Is thy heart upright as my heart is towards thee?
A60427	Whether thou wouldst not deny Christ as Peter did, if thou were in Peters straights, and nothing to succour thee but policy?
A60427	Whether thou wouldst not steal, if thou didst see a Booty as fit as Achan, which thou mightst catch up, and no one spy thee?
A60427	Whether thou wouldst refuse a Bribe like Elisha, if thou didst meet with one which were as willing and able to give it as Naaman?
A60427	Who can but wonder, to see how Christ and they for whom Christ came, were occupied at one time?
A60427	Will ye know beside, what it is to be guilty of the body and blood of Christ?
A60427	Will ye know who Receiveth unworthily?
A60427	Would they think that they did eat Christ''s body, when his body stood before them, and he had told them before that his body was like their body?
A60427	and may not Christ say when he seeth a thing like his body, This is my Body?
A60427	his Body was not broken before he suffered, how did he say then, which is broken, before it was broken?
A60427	not, Master, is it he?
A60427	not, Master, what shall they do?
A60427	the Bread which he blessed; well then, yet it is Bread: when he had broken it, then he gave it; what did he give?
A60427	the Bread which he break: well then, yet it is Bread: when he had given it, they did eat it; what did they eat?
A60427	the Bread which he gave them; well then, yet it is Bread: when they did eat it, then he said, This is my Body; what did he call his Body?
A60427	the Bread which he took; well then, yet it is Bread: when he had blessed it, then he break it; what did he break?
A70303	And a little after, How many are there now adaies that say, O that I could see his Figure, his Garments, his Shooes?
A70303	And did Tradition duely circumstantiated, ever yet fail?
A70303	And how would this high favour melt your soul into a mòst tender affection towards him?
A70303	And then think how it could be possible for a whole Country by little and little imperceptibly to change its Language?
A70303	And what was that?
A70303	And why all this?
A70303	And why?
A70303	But barely to tell us, that it is his blood, and yet to let it tast and appear as it did; how is this credible?
A70303	But hovv do I knovv that Jesus Christ taught that he vvas God?
A70303	But how can bread be the body of Christ?
A70303	But how comes it to pass then, we having had Historians that have mentioned far less Matters, yet say not a word of any such thing?
A70303	But how do I know Jesus Christ wrought such miracles?
A70303	But how is the Earth holy, and to be adored by us?
A70303	But how was this new Faith bred in us?
A70303	But how?
A70303	But if there be so much to be said for this great mystery, how comes it to pass so many have so great difficulty to believe it?
A70303	But to get a right, strong and well grounded Faith concerning this high mystery, what must we do?
A70303	But what word of Christ?
A70303	But why so?
A70303	By Consecration: Consecration; by what and whose words is it perfected?
A70303	Did they some strange morning or other, all awake of a different belief from what they had been of the Evening before?
A70303	Doest thou see then how operative the word of Christ is?
A70303	Else how came all Christendom, according to the confession of our Adversaries for many Ages universally to believe it?
A70303	For why are we so assured our senses can not deceive us?
A70303	He changed water into wine in Cana of Galilee, by his sole Will, and shall he not be worthy whom we may believe, that he changed wine into his blood?
A70303	How came they then not to clash about it, or if they did, how comes it to pass other differences are recorded and this is omitted?
A70303	How came they then to lose their cause?
A70303	How came they to learn it then?
A70303	How can this stand with the Almightys desire, that the World should not mistake the true Religion?
A70303	How earnestly should we have made all our Petitions to him, and how heartily should we have thanked him for all his Love?
A70303	How heartily would you cry him mercy for all your sins, and earnestly recommend all the desires of your soul unto him?
A70303	How is it not contrary to one, but to all the Miracles that ever he wrought?
A70303	How would the presence of such an Oblation have kept them attentive, and encreased their servor in their Prayers?
A70303	I have a horror to mention them, for they are such proud things,& c. But may not general Councils at least presume to reach new Doctrines?
A70303	I read the citations to a Clergy- man of my Acquaintance, I demand of him what he thought their belief was, who in those words expressed their Faith?
A70303	In fine, what vertue should not our dear Saviour have given us example of, by such a charitable humiliation of himself?
A70303	Is it not because we never experienced them to fail us in due circumstances?
A70303	Is it not sufficient that the substance of our- Lord''s body in Heaven, be made to be under the accidents of bread and wine here?
A70303	Let him pretend Scriptures, and bring a thousand places out of the Law, Psalms, Prophets, and Apostles; what will the Reply be?
A70303	Moreover our Lord Jesus himself testifies unto us, that we receive his body and blood; ought we then to doubt of his testification?
A70303	Nor do Catholicks therefore, out of such a circumstance, doubt of all the bread they see, whether it be not their Lords body or no?
A70303	Now what is this Foot- stool of God?
A70303	Or did the Britons before S. Austin the Monk, believe no such thing?
A70303	Or rather would not such pittiful Weapons fall out of thy hand, at the presence of so great Doctors, and such grave Prelates of Gods Church?
A70303	Or will my Calvinist have the impudence to accuse( as some do) th ● se grave Doctors of blindness?
A70303	Seeing then Christ himself so affirms and says concerning the bread, This is my body who after this can dare to doubt of it?
A70303	What an Age are we fal''n into?
A70303	What an incentive would this have been to Christian piety?
A70303	What arguments would occur to thee?
A70303	What means then to make persons thus disposed to leave their an ● ient Faith, and admit of a Novelty?
A70303	What must they pretend then, to impose upon their Children this new and strange mysterious Doctrine?
A70303	Why then in our present case, if he turn wine into his blood, does it not appear to our fight to be blood?
A70303	Why, how is the substance of the same Air condens''d under a lesser quantity to day, which rarified yesterday, was under a greater quantity?
A70303	With what face wouldst thou look upon them?
A70303	Wouldst thou dare, wouldst thou have the face to produce such wodden Daggers as thou art ever and anon drawing upon us?
A70303	without a Teacher, and all in the same year, or in what length of time?
A02396	And then last of all, let them close vp all with this pleasing conceit, that surely their opinion is inuincible: for why?
A02396	And yet should not he be thought( at least) distempred in his wittes, that would hereupon inferre a substantiall change of that water?
A02396	Are not not all His expostulations& messages whatsoeuer, directed vnto the conscience, whose ground is Sense and Science?
A02396	Are then thy supposes dishonourable vnto God?
A02396	As if God speakes vnto vs in any other language but our owne?
A02396	As if cob- webs were any whit the stronger for beeing built in pallaces?
A02396	Because the corruption of nature must be wrought out, must therefore nature it selfe be destroyed?
A02396	But say then; wha ● was the intent of this our Sau ● ours Ordinance?
A02396	But shall man therefore be carelesse of his actions?
A02396	Could His multiplying loaues be more wonderfull, then this multiplying humane bodies?
A02396	Could there then be imagined a more abominable reproach against the highest, then once to imagine the like manner of receiuing Him?
A02396	Does God call for thy seruice, because He needs it?
A02396	Does not euery word of God presuppose at least a reasonable vnderstanding, being otherwise as commendable vnto the beast?
A02396	Euen thus much alone might it not bee sufficient to conclude the Church to be negatiue concerning these supposes?
A02396	For are not Sense& Reason the very ordinance of God, imprinted in mans nature when it was most perfect?
A02396	For else, why saies an other Scripture, it is impossible that God should lie?
A02396	For first concerning Scripture; where does that affirme or import any such matters?
A02396	For the onely meanes which Grace vseth vnto mans conuersion, being preaching and miracles: take away Sense, and what shall become of preaching?
A02396	For what meant Moses when he tooke that golden calfe, and beating it to powder, made the Idolaters drinke of it?
A02396	For what though the cause happily did not need our helpe, or that the truth were plaine enough?
A02396	God can raise children out of stones, and humane bodies out of morsells of bread; must it therefore so be expected?
A02396	He passed through the wombe of a woman without defilement; true: but was it without abasement?
A02396	If thou sinnest( saith Iob) what doest thou against Him: or if thou be righteous, what giuest thou vnto Him?
A02396	Imagine, O ● ucifer, if thou canst?
A02396	Is it any thing to the Almighty that thou art righteous?
A02396	It saith, This is my body; true: and who saies otherwise?
A02396	Or againe, how is it that they so often rehearse in the Gospells the other miracles, and yet will not vouchsafe any of these once the naming?
A02396	Or does their adoring Him, as they pretend, before they thus receiue Him, helpe the matter?
A02396	Or must we suppose, that though no Scriptures expresly affirme these things, yet by inference or circumstance they may imply as much?
A02396	Or say if that Beast could haue more names of blasphemy vpon his head then this hath?
A02396	So againe take away reason, and what shall become of miracles?
A02396	So because sense and reason can not lay hold of future things, shall therefore the Faith deny their iudgement in present things?
A02396	The blasphemies of wicked men do no way hurt, or come nigh Him; shall it therefore be lawfull to blaspheame?
A02396	Thou reachest foorth thy hand in loue or fauour vnto some man; he biteth it, or puts it in his mouth; does hee honour thee in so doing?
A02396	What then, in the second place, saith the Church?
A02396	and is this a fit e ● ercise for to learne a weak fai ● to beleeue, by putting vpon such manner of supposes?
A02396	and the hypocrite to the common opinion, to see the madnesse of speaking in an vnknowne tongue?
A02396	as if the true eating of this flesh indeed, did not consist in our onely beleeuing on Him, and that before euer we tast of this Sacrament?
A02396	because dooms day may be to morrowe, must it needs therefore so befal?
A02396	but what meant He?
A02396	can it be ingrafted into the beast?
A02396	can not my beast be subiect vnto me, vnlesse it falls downe vnder me?
A02396	does He not send the vnbeleeuer to his touch, to feele the truth of his resurrection?
A02396	does possibility impose necessitie?
A02396	does ruling ouer subiects consist in destroying subiects?
A02396	how shal they mooue admiration and astonishment, or get acknowledgement?
A02396	how shall we heare, or how shall we read?
A02396	is therefore honour and dishonour vnto Him all one?
A02396	or because the Eye can not heare, shall therefore the Eare put out the eye?
A02396	or must we rather goe search from age to age, the particular determination of the Fathers and writers in their times about these matters?
A02396	or that Scripture which tells vs that wee must eate His flesh,& c. does it of necessitie bind vs to beleeue, that here it is in the forme of bread?
A02396	or was his transfiguration on the mount more meruailous, then this His transformation, or, transubstantiation, if it were not counterfeit?
A02396	shall they not so much the sooner be swept away?
A02396	the Ruffian to the light of nature, to see the deformitie of long haire?
A02396	was it to doe a honour vnto the Idoll, or to ingraine the people in Idolatry?
A02396	what then?
A02396	what was his meaning?
A02396	when He called Peter a stone did he meane to turne him into a stone, as He did the vnbeleeuer into a pillar of salt?
A02396	where then is the merit thereof?
A02396	wilt thou therefore be indifferent whether thou sinnest or not, whether thou does well or not?
A02396	would He haue giuen them no expectation of such wonders toward?
A02396	yea take away these reasonable powers, and what shall become of the Faith?
A02396	yea, had the Disciples supposed any such wonders, would they haue bin so silent, without so much as asking, how can these things be?
A02396	yea, what more abominable vsage can be imagined?
A02396	yea, when the Lord meanes most palpably to conuince men, does He not referre them to their senses?
A02396	● magine who can?
A66413	10 ▪ But how doth he mould the Word of God into what Form he pleases, that understands that Figuratively which was Figuratively spoken?
A66413	20?
A66413	And if he reads the Protestant Answer again, he will find no occasion for those words, Where,& c. if this be it not?
A66413	And if the same, how it could come from Heaven, when he was of the Seed of David, according to the Flesh?
A66413	And indeed, thus St. Peter understood him, who concludes almost in the same words, Lord, to whom shall we go?
A66413	And so he runs on to the Creation, and Incarnation,& c. I am a little at a loss here, to what cause our Authors mistake is to be assign''d?
A66413	And to whom doth our Author speak when he thus Expostulates, Is it because our Saviour spake some things by way of Parable, that all he said was such?
A66413	And where( to add another Where) will he find these literally in the words, This is my Body?
A66413	And whether Christ who is perfect God, may not be intire in the Sacrament, and in many places at one and the same time, is the Query?
A66413	And why did he not as sharply admonish him for offering to shew that the words might infer the conversion of Christ''s Flesh into Bread?
A66413	Answerer was, what the meaning is of This, in, This is my Body?
A66413	As how?
A66413	But after all, what is this to the Argument?
A66413	But doth it not matter whether St. Mark expresseth the words in order?
A66413	But here he saith that the Answerer pretends not to prove by these Texts that the Body and Blood of Christ are not in the Sacrament, p. 24 Why so?
A66413	But how doth he clear the Point, and shew they infer no such conversion?
A66413	But what has he to accuse the Protestant Answerer of?
A66413	But what is this to his Soul and Divinity; and to the literal sense of he that eateth me, and the Argument the Answerer prest upon him?
A66413	But what need is there to go to the Church in this case?
A66413	But what then?
A66413	But what was the Parable he spoke?
A66413	But what''s become of the Seeker himself, for this four Months past?
A66413	But what''s become of the Soul and Divinity of Christ?
A66413	But when Christ promised to be in the midst of them, did he promise to be there Corporally?
A66413	But where is that perfidiousness, since no more is denied to Christ, than is to God?
A66413	But where is this plain Scripture for the Door''s being a Parable?
A66413	But where is this the opinion of the Protestant Answerer?
A66413	But why all this, when he believes all the Scripture teaches, and reason it self justifies?
A66413	But why did our Saviour repeat it?
A66413	But, how these things could be thus applied to our Saviour without a Figure?
A66413	Did he confirm the Literal sense?
A66413	Doth he think these were before the Sacrament?
A66413	Doth it not suppose the Absence of the thing?
A66413	First, saith he, Let the Catholick Answerer tell me without a Figure, what is that meat which endures to Everlasting Life?
A66413	For the Question is not, Whether a Spiritual Being may not be under the appearance of a Body?
A66413	For what tho all the Evangelists agree that the words, This is my Blood; were then used by our Saviour?
A66413	Had he no other way to get clear of his Adversary, but to fix this upon him?
A66413	Has the Protestant Answer to the Seekers Request, broke these Measures, and forced them to think of another Expedient?
A66413	He saith further, How could they be guilty of the Body and Blood of the Lord, v. 27. if the Body and Blood be not there?
A66413	Here indeed he has put a Question, which I confess I should have been ready to ask; What''s this to the purpose?
A66413	How Jesus is Bread, and the Bread that came down from Heaven?
A66413	How can this man give us his Flesh to eat?
A66413	How can this man give us his Flesh to eat?
A66413	How mean and ridiculous is this?
A66413	How one of his Church can talk of a literal Sense of,[ except ye drink his Blood], which denies the Cup to the Laity?
A66413	How that?
A66413	How the Bread and the Flesh of Christ could be the same?
A66413	How the Son was sealed by the Father?
A66413	How this?
A66413	If bodily, I would fain know under what Form he is there?
A66413	If this had been done, how meanly would it have look''d ▪ though he brought his 24 Texts to prove it?
A66413	Is it because our Saviour spake some things by way of Parable, that all he said was such?
A66413	Is not the Real Presence and Transubstantiation all as one?
A66413	May not a man believe, unless he believes contrary to what he himself sees, and the Scripture teaches?
A66413	Neither is the Question, whether an Object may be one thing to the eye of Flesh, and another to the eye of Faith?
A66413	Now his Body was pierced, and Blood spilt at his Circumcision, followed by unspeakable Pains, restless Labours,& c. What his Agony in the Garden?
A66413	Now, where is the fault?
A66413	Now, who would not think upon this charge, that his Real Presence and Transubstantiation, are as inconsistent as Truth and Falshood?
A66413	Or doth the Repetition of it without Explication shew it to be the Literal sense?
A66413	Or in the Form of Tongues of Fire?
A66413	Or is it perfidious to say, it''s impossible to make the circumscribed Body of Christ to be Omnipresent?
A66413	Or that he never spake otherwise?
A66413	Or why is he worse than Thomas, when Thomas would not believe unless he saw?
A66413	Our Author readily answers, Ask the Question, What?
A66413	Pray, saith he, how was his Body to be seen, Extended, Finite, and Circumscribed, when he pass''d through Walls and Doors that were close?
A66413	So Jewish it is to question God, how he could do it?
A66413	Surely he could not but understand that the How relates not to the manner, How these things be?
A66413	This do: What?
A66413	This do; What?
A66413	This is( what?)
A66413	To all these our Author returns a general Answer, As to his, How the Son was sealed by the Father, and the rest of his How''s?
A66413	Was his Body Intire, Extended, Finite, and Circumscribed with Limbs, Bones, and Sinews?
A66413	Well, how will he prove Christ intirely in the Sacrament?
A66413	What did he confirm?
A66413	What his being crowned with Thorns and Bloody Whipping at the Pillar?
A66413	What is there he would have him believe?
A66413	What of the Declaration he was in the Conclusion to make for the Catholick Faith of Rome, which we are now told of?
A66413	What of the self- same Substance wherein he was born of the Virgin?
A66413	What of the true Body, truly, really, and substantially contain''d under the Forms of Bread and Wine?
A66413	What saith our Author to this?
A66413	What saith our Author to this?
A66413	What shall I say?
A66413	What though Christ first gave thanks, and blessed it, before he gave it, if he did not also use the words of Conversion, before he gave it?
A66413	What, saith he, is this to the Being, or not Being of the Body and Blood of Christ in the Sacrament?
A66413	Where that the Bread and Wine are upon Consecration turned into the true Body and Blood of Christ?
A66413	Where that the Bread and Wine are upon Consecration, turn''d into the True Body and Blood of Christ,& c. Which truly, are Where''s indeed?
A66413	Where that this true Body and Blood is truly, really and substantially contained under the Forms of Bread and Wine?
A66413	Where that this true Body and Blood?
A66413	Where the insincerity?
A66413	Where''s now the Resolution he was to come to?
A66413	Where, When and How did Christ give us Bread to eat which should be his Flesh, if this be it not in the Sacrament?
A66413	Where, says he, is there one word?
A66413	Which are what he profess''d firmly and truly to believe by the same Faith he believes a God?
A66413	Which if true, what need of Teachers?
A66413	Will our Author venture to say, there is no more from Scripture to prove the Consubstantiality of the Son, than there is to prove Transubstantiation?
A66413	in the land of Oberon?
A66413	thought I, where am I now?
A66413	which if fully resolved, will overthr ● w all his reasoning Ware besides?
A66413	who would not think now, that the word Transubstantiation was abominated by him, and as little used in their Church, as it is in ours?
A66413	— How came he through?
A09108	& c. What dost thou search after thinges vnsearcheable?
A09108	And I would aske ● this poore glossist, what maketh this note to the purpose of S. Chrysostome?
A09108	And could the auncient Fathers speake more effectually, properly or cleerly then this?
A09108	And doth any man vnderstand him?
A09108	And finally, whether his words were effectuall, and wrought any thinge or noe?
A09108	And is not Ridley ridiculous heere?
A09108	And is not this a Bishopp like aunswere?
A09108	And is not this a goodly proofe of so great a charge?
A09108	And is not this ridiculous, or doth Ridley vnderstand this his riddle?
A09108	And is there any Protestant that will speake thus?
A09108	And is there any Protestant, that will speake thus at this day?
A09108	And the other Saint Cyrill of Alexandria saith to the same effect; that in this mystery we should not so much as aske quomodo how yt can be done?
A09108	And to the same effect in his booke de Sacramentis: Ergo sermo Christi hoc conficit Sacramentum; Qui sermo?
A09108	And what great miracle is this I pray yow, to multiply many figures in diuers places of one thinge, who may not do so?
A09108	And whether this be of such necessity, as he may not be without a wife, one at least?
A09108	And yet who seeth not, that this is but a playne shift?
A09108	And yf he replyed in so large a manner as Fox setteth it downe, how did they breake of?
A09108	As for example, Fortè dicas,& c. Perhaps yow may say, how are these things true?
A09108	But I would aske him, who shal be iudge what the holy Ghost teacheth vs?
A09108	But how doth Caluyn proue( thinke yow) that our beleefe of the Sacrament implyeth this contradiction of flesh and no flesh?
A09108	But how doth Cranmer himselfe auoyd this plaine authority of S. Ambrose, thinke yow?
A09108	Christ Iesus doth testifie vnto vs, that vve receaue his body& bloud, and shall we doubt of his testimony?
A09108	Christ, and S. Chrysostome expoundinge him, or Ridley against them both?
A09108	Church hath not for her beleefe in that high mistery?
A09108	Consider heere the speach of Saint Augustine, whether it may agree to the eatinge of a signe of Christs body or bloud; what horror is there in that?
A09108	Do you graunt the antecedent?
A09108	Do yow see a wise argument?
A09108	Do yow see his breuity and obscurity?
A09108	Do yow see the euasion?
A09108	Do yow see the fond euasion?
A09108	Do yow see this exposition?
A09108	Doctor Cole replyed; is it not a shame for an old man to lye?
A09108	Dost thou see bread?
A09108	For first what authority, maiesty and verity of scriptures doth this man bring forth; trow you, for confirmation of this his vaunt?
A09108	For what men or people would haue attempted to begin, or bring in so great a matter as this?
A09108	For yf they brake of, how did he reply, especially his reply being somewhat long?
A09108	Forty yeares gone, vvhether could yow haue gone to haue found your doctrine?
A09108	Further, whether Christ be true in his words,& whether he mynded to do that, which he spake at his last supper?
A09108	How shall yt be made euident to these heretiks, that this bread, in which thanks haue byn giuen, is the body of their Lord?
A09108	In so high matters( as these of the Sacrament) let vs neuer thinke or alleage this word( quomodo) that is, how yt can be?
A09108	Item whether sense and reason, ought not to giue place in this mystery to faith?
A09108	Maister Horne, Maister Horne, there are many Churches in Germany, I pray yow vvhich of these Churches are ye of?
A09108	Marke now heere gentle reader, what yt is to dispute with these people, that seeke after nothinge but shifts& holes to runne out at, or stipp away?
A09108	Nay is not this a goodly ground and head- springe of proofes?
A09108	Now heere I vvould aske Iohn Fox what he meaneth by this note; that they were forced to breake of for lacke of tyme?
A09108	Num ● ides panem?
A09108	Our Lord Iesus Christ doth iestifie vnto vs, that we do receaue his body and bloud, and may we doubt of his creditt or testimony?
A09108	Quid paras dentes& ventrem?
A09108	S. Cyrill reasoneth thus: VVheras Christ hath said of the bread, this is my body, vvho vvill dare to doubt therof?
A09108	The bread which we breake, is yt not a communication of the body of Christ?
A09108	The light?
A09108	The third was: whether the body and bloud of Christ be vnited to bread Sacramentally?
A09108	These are the particularityes vsed by the Fathers for declaring what body they meane; and can there be any more effectuall speaches then these?
A09108	These be contraryes, which of two shall we beleeue?
A09108	Thou madd- man how dost thou demaund of the power of God, that he should make flesh to be flesh, and not flesh at one tyme?
A09108	VVe giue yow place, do vve not?
A09108	VVho shall declare forth all his praises?
A09108	VVill yow not then proceed in the order appointed yow?
A09108	What can be spoken more cleerly or distinctly by so ancient a wittnesse?
A09108	What fleshely thinge or quality doth yt receaue by the omnipotency of the word in consecration?
A09108	What letteth but that this( of the camell) may be done, yf Gods will be to haue yt so?
A09108	Whervnto Doctor Glyn answered: Yow impugne a thinge yow know not: what call yow generation?
A09108	Who can vnderstand how this can be done by a man?
A09108	and cauil only about the second, vvhether the vvater be turned into wine, or remaine togeather with the wine?
A09108	and how then was Ridley persuaded, and not they?
A09108	and vvheras he hath said of the wine, this is my bloud, vvho vvill doubt or say yt is not his bloud?
A09108	and why?
A09108	and yet that Parker replyed, and began his reply with a prayer?
A09108	crede& manducasti: Why dost thou prepare thy teeth and thy belly?
A09108	dost thou see wyne heere?
A09108	doth God vse to reward sinne?
A09108	nempè is,& c. Therfore the speach of Christ doth make this Sacrament; but what speach?
A09108	num vinum?
A09108	or doth not this reprehension agree fully to Protestants, that haue broken downe more Altars, and chalices, then euer the Donatists did?
A09108	or is his aunswere any thinge to the purpose for satisfyinge the Fathers?
A09108	or that water& wine do remaine togeather, and that one would pretermit the first questiō, to witt, whether wine be really& truly there or no?
A09108	or to prayse that which prouoketh his wrath?
A09108	or what reall property of bread doth it leese by this change mencyoned by S. Cyprian?
A09108	or what sense can it haue?
A09108	or who would haue receaued yt without opposition, yf yt had not byn established euen from the beginninge?
A09108	what property of fleshely nature doth your communion bread receaue?
A41592	A hard word, and who can endure it; a new word, and who will admit it?
A41592	And he adds St. Peter, St. Paul, and all the Apostles are Food, will you conclude from hence, the Apostles were not true Men?
A41592	And if it profit not without Faith, how can it profit those who believe not?
A41592	And if they believed the Promise, why should they be disquieted at the Institution?
A41592	And if this Humiliation, O Lord, I am unworthy, be attributed to any thing but our Saviour there present, how can you excuse it from Idolatrie?
A41592	And pray what horror would there be, to eat an Image of Flesh?
A41592	And this caused Blandina to say, How could they be guilty of such a heinous eating?
A41592	And what Prerogative enjoy you beyond that of an Angel?
A41592	And what has the Parable of the Tares to do with the Blessed Sacrament?
A41592	And what more unworthy than to believe men in Testimonies they give one of another, and to despise God in those he speaks of himself?
A41592	Are you not ashamed of your Sophism?
A41592	At vero quisquis ista non credit, Si vidisset Christum in Cruce in specie servi, quomodo Deum illum intelligeret, nisi per fidem prius credidisset?
A41592	But can you deny that in those words you alledge from St. Luke, where Christ''s Blood is said to be shed, is contained a mystical Sacrifice?
A41592	But do not the foregoing Authorities prove something more, a change not in the Receiver, but in the thing received?
A41592	But do you think this Resistance was laudable in the Jews?
A41592	But if St. Justin say, The Passover is our Saviour, would you desire a more plain exposition, than the very following words, that is, our Refuge?
A41592	But what connexion between Pharao''s Dream, and the change of Bread in the Sacrament?
A41592	But what doth this avail your cause?
A41592	But what was this Schism?
A41592	But whilst I let them enquire one of another, what gave being to these Atoms?
A41592	But why did the Church prefer the more difficile sense, when she might have chosen a more facile in appearance?
A41592	But why do I say Testimonie, when the Passage you cite, is nothing but a bare Parenthesis?
A41592	But why do I say, difficult?
A41592	Christ formerly changed Water into Wine; and is he not to be believed, changing Wine into his Blood?
A41592	Do not Flesh, Nerves, Bones and Blood, belong to a true Substantial Body?
A41592	Do you believe this Opposition was commendable in the Disciples?
A41592	Do you believe you receive the Body and Blood of Christ?
A41592	Does not this evidence the possibility of Transubstantiation?
A41592	Does this favour the Protestants?
A41592	Et quem tam amentem esse put as, qui illud quo vescatur, Deum credat esse?
A41592	For admitting no Body of Christ in Heaven, how could he pretend a real Body of Christ in the Sacrament?
A41592	For how can I solve an Objection which stands instead of a thousand Demonstrations?
A41592	For how can this( which was Bread) be Christ''s true Body, and not lose its own substance?
A41592	For if God can give a Natural Existence to what is not, can what is, hinder God from adding a Supernatural Existence?
A41592	For what more Kind than to give himself?
A41592	Had this been so, how easily could sense and reason have unfolded, what appeared difficult?
A41592	He tells us what he gives, is his own Body; why will you not believe him?
A41592	How can they deny, says he, the Flesh to be capable of the Gift of God?
A41592	How could Aristotle pronounce, the matter of Sense was never to be disputed, when''t was always to be pry''d into, and regulated by Reason?
A41592	How could they imagine the Lamb changed into God, when they knew, God could not receive the least alteration, I am the Lord, and not chang''d?
A41592	How could this be understood of Man?
A41592	How do you call these Symbols after consecration?
A41592	How often have you been incredulous with the Capharnaits, saying, How can he give us his Flesh?
A41592	How often with the unfaithfull Disciples murmured, who can endure this Doctrin?
A41592	How then doth the spiritual reception by Faith exclude the substantial Communion of Christ''s Body in St. Austin''s Opinion?
A41592	How then is the substance of the Elements not changed, because the Eucharist is a Sacrament, and a Sacrament is a Sign?
A41592	How then was he caught in his own Net?
A41592	I answer, how can you contradict our Saviour, who says, this is my Body which is broken?
A41592	If it profited on the Cross, why does it not profit in the Sacrament?
A41592	Is not this a plain repetition of St. Matthew''s words?
A41592	Is not this to follow Scripture?
A41592	Is then the Doctrin of Transubstantiation not the belief of the Primitive Church, because Diogenes walked before Zeno''s Eyes?
A41592	Is this not real Flesh?
A41592	Is your Illation stronger, the Eucharist is a Sacrament or Sign, therefore it is not the Substance?
A41592	Marcion argues for you, but why did he call Bread his Body, and not something else?
A41592	Nor is a pressing Example wanting in the Apostle, to the same purpose; are not they( the Pagans) which eat of the Sacrifices, Partakers of the Altar?
A41592	Nor was St. Athanasius''s Interrogation of less force: Are you offended at the newness of the Name?
A41592	Not believing what?
A41592	Now I examin; Whether Scripture Authorise Transubstantiation?
A41592	Now if all this were to be expounded of a Figure, what wresting would there be of this Article?
A41592	Now what is this to your purpose?
A41592	Of the true Body?
A41592	Or rather, how durst you equalize the People with Christ, Sinners with their Saviour, Man with God?
A41592	Or rather, to be disturbed at our Saviour''s Ordination and Assertion, Is it not the beginning of Incredulity?
A41592	Or would promise what he could not effect?
A41592	Patriarcha, Quàm indignum est Humanis Testimoniis de alio credamus, Dei oraculis de se non credamus?
A41592	Quid est hoc horribilius?
A41592	Quid hoc ergo est?
A41592	Si Discipuli patienter ferre nequiverunt quod Dominus Dixit, quomodo ferunt ista increduli?
A41592	So does St. Chrysostom; What is the Bread?
A41592	So where we read in St. Matthew?
A41592	St. Chrysostom adds, We speak of God, and you ask how this can be?
A41592	The Bread which we break, is it not the Communion of the Body of Christ?
A41592	The Bread which we break, is it not the* Substance of the Body of Christ?
A41592	The Cup of Blessing which we bless, is it not the Communion of the Blood of Christ?
A41592	The Divine Son is a Figure of his Father''s Substance: and who can wrest from him the same Substance with his Eternal Father?
A41592	The Flesh which suffered for us, and rose again, was it a Figure, or was it true Flesh?
A41592	The Question is, What is the thing promised to be given, whether the true Body of Christ or not?
A41592	The Question is, what this was?
A41592	The Substance is changed; For how could the inward Substance of Bread and Wine pass by Divine operation into Christ''s Body, and not cease to be?
A41592	This was seconded with the Complaint of his own Disciples; This is a hard saying, and who can hear it?
A41592	Was all England ignorant of the Restauration of our Gracious Monarch; and were there none to be found to witness his coming in?
A41592	Was this a piece of Bread, or the true substantial Body of Christ?
A41592	What are those Symbols, which the Priest offers to God?
A41592	What is contain''d in Baptism, is it not the proper Grace of Adoption?
A41592	What is signified or contained is the Mysterie, which is not prejudiced by the foregoing Speech?
A41592	What is then this Bread which Christ promised to give in the Sacrament?
A41592	What is this( wholsome) remedy?
A41592	What more conformable to the Doctrine of Transubstantiation?
A41592	What more pressing a figurative understanding of this passage, I am the door?
A41592	What then?
A41592	Whether will you believe, Nine several Councils, or Berengarius an Apostate, who yet afterwards recanted?
A41592	Why does it not appear Flesh to us, but Bread?
A41592	Will you acknowledge what this Divine holds and professes?
A41592	Yet who dare say this Flesh was not true Flesh, or profited nothing, which redeemed all the World?
A41592	You mean the Miracles which were wrought by our Saviour and his Apostles, the Assurance whereof did at first depend upon the certainty of Sense?
A41592	and if all had been quiet, would not Vienna have been surprised and pilledged?
A41592	do you not tremble at the excess of your Temerity?
A41592	for who is carried in his own hands?
A41592	how can a Protestant pass into the Roman Catholic Church, and become a pious Member thereof, and not truly cease to be a Protestant?
A41592	or affraid of the verity of the Mystery?
A41592	or into the Messias, when change of one thing into another supposes both their existences, and the Messias was not yet born?
A41592	or what Language speaks of killing the Figure of a Man?
A41592	the Prop of this Profoundness?
A41592	the Source of this Light?
A41592	were not the Tares, as soon as they sprung up, seen and discovered?
A41592	what is the Origin of this Silence?
A41592	whence came this Verity?
A41592	who abstain, upon fasting days from Flesh which may lawfully be eaten?
A41592	who thought these Numbers?
A61532	18?
A61532	And as long as every year the Church judged of the competency of Persons for it?
A61532	And how could therebe a Tradition in so much silence?
A61532	And if it will not, what a Case is the Church in, under such a pretended Universality?
A61532	And if that doth not imply a promise of Grace, then how can it now?
A61532	And if this were then part of the Rule of Faith, how could such a Man, who was Professour of Divinity at Tubing be ignorant of it?
A61532	And was Confession to a Priest necessary under the Law?
A61532	And what is gotten by this?
A61532	And what now saith J. W. against all this?
A61532	And what would it have signified for him to have said that Christ was sensibly broken and eaten under the Species of Bread and Wine?
A61532	And whether these words of our Saviour do imply it?
A61532	Boileau hath taken another course, for he saith, this whole Distinction is without ground attributed to Gratian; but how doth he prove it?
A61532	But Natalis Alexander thinks there is no binding Power with respect to Baptism; Was there not as to Simon Magus?
A61532	But both are Parties, and is not the Councils Judgment to be taken rather than a few Opposers?
A61532	But here comes another Question, Who is to be Judge of these?
A61532	But how can that be, when he saith, the Form even of those he calls proper Sacraments, was either appointed by our Lord or by the Church?
A61532	But how comes my late Book to be made an Example?
A61532	But how comes the Canon to be received as of divine Inspiration which was not so received among the Jews?
A61532	But how doth it prove that it is a Sacrament upon any other Account, under the Gospel?
A61532	But how doth this prove that a man ought to take this particular way?
A61532	But how is this consistent with the Saintship of St. Jerom?
A61532	But how shall we knew them?
A61532	But how should it be of Divine Right in the sense of the Council of Trent, if there be no Command for it?
A61532	But how then do they hold the Doctrine and Tradition of true Merit?
A61532	But if it be true matter, why is it not so declared?
A61532	But if it were no heretical Opinion then, what becomes of Infallible Tradition?
A61532	But it seems, I am mistaken here too: How so?
A61532	But on what was the Opinion of the Necessity of Seven Sacraments grounded?
A61532	But this Office being taken away, the Question now is, whether it were thought necessary to confess privately to any other?
A61532	But were not they concerned to know whether it were a Sacrament or not?
A61532	But what Catholick Tradition was there for this?
A61532	But what Remainders are there in Children, who have not actually sinned, and Original sin is done away already?
A61532	But what Scripture?
A61532	But what is all this to Catholick Truths not being contained in Scripture either in words or by consequence?
A61532	But what is all this to the Tradition of the Church in Gratian''s time?
A61532	But what is it to be truly and properly a Sacrament?
A61532	But what is there in all this that makes a man guilty of Heresie?
A61532	But what is this to the Council of Trent?
A61532	But what made the Council of Trent so much concerned for a Scholastick Subtilty?
A61532	But what need that if there were a Catholick Tradition then in the Church concerning it, and that inforced by two Popes?
A61532	But where is this Catholick Truth to be found?
A61532	But where was this Chrism appointed by Christ?
A61532	But whether the present Universality dissents from Antiquity, whose Judgment should be sooner taken than its own?
A61532	By the Pope, or the Congregation of the Index?
A61532	By whom have they been approved?
A61532	Can any one hold the Substance to remain, and not to remain at the same time?
A61532	Can any thing be more contrary to S. C ● rysostom than this?
A61532	Credis non pr ● priis meritis, sed pass ● ● ● ● Domini nostri Jesu Christi virtute& merito ad gloriam pervenire?
A61532	Did it not own that the Matters of it were prepared before its Dissolution?
A61532	Doth this exclude his contradicting his Predecessours?
A61532	For still if it be true Matter of a Sacrament, why was it not so declared?
A61532	For then, some might believe Three, others Four, others Five, but how can this prove that all believed just Seven?
A61532	For what is the desire of the Penitent to the force of the Sacrament administred by the Priest?
A61532	For, if it had been, how could Gregory I. reject the Book of Machabees out of the Canon, when two of his Predecessours took it in?
A61532	For, is every Man left to his own Conscience, where he is bound to go to Confession before he partakes of the Eucharist?
A61532	He puts the Question himself, why Christ appointed the Form only of Two Sacraments, when all the Grace of the Sacraments comes from him?
A61532	He shews from Tertullian, Ambrose and Cyril that the necessary Sacraments are mentioned; but where are the rest?
A61532	How can Confession, when it is no visible sign, nor any permanent thing as an Element must be?
A61532	How can such Sacraments be of divine Institution, whose very Form is appointed by the Church?
A61532	How can that be, if Tradition be a Rule of Faith distinct from it?
A61532	How can the Act of the Penitent signifie the Grace conveyed in Absolution?
A61532	How can this be consistent with another Rule of Faith distinct from Scripture?
A61532	How can this be, if there be another infallible way of conveying the Will of God besides the Scriptures?
A61532	How comes the Case to be so much altered from what it was in his Predecessor''s time?
A61532	How comes the Doctrine condemned in Wickliff to be established in the Council of Trent?
A61532	How much is the Faith of the Church changed?
A61532	How then came the Originals to be turned into the common Language?
A61532	How then can Contrition make up any part of the Matter of a Sacrament, when it is not external?
A61532	How then can Tradition be a Rule of Faith equal with Scriptures, which depends upon the Testimony of Persons who are so very fallible?
A61532	How then can it be necessary to embrace another Rule of Faith, when all things necessary to Salvation are sufficiently contained in Scripture?
A61532	How then can they pretend any similitude between their Confession and the ancient Exomologesis?
A61532	How then can those words prove it necessary under the Gospel?
A61532	How then can we imagine that such Translations should not onely be allowed but approved among them?
A61532	How then comes Bellarmin to insist so much on the Answer of Jeremias?
A61532	If S. Jerom were so mistaken( which it is very hard to believe) how came Ruffinus not to observe his errours and opposition to the Church?
A61532	If all the publick Discipline had been laid aside so long before, to what purpose do those Bishops speak of them, as if they were still in force?
A61532	If it were their own Language they might well understand it; but why should not the Scripture now be in a Language they may understand?
A61532	If the Scripture were intended for all, how comes a Prohibition of the use of it?
A61532	If the whole Will of God were to be known by the Scripture, how could part of it be preserved in an unwritten Tradition?
A61532	If there be no proportion or equality on Man''s part, no Justice on God''s part to reward, how can they possibly be meritorious?
A61532	In what Manner the Body of Christ is made to be present in the Sacrament?
A61532	Is not true matter necessary to a true Sacrament?
A61532	It is true, that he doth speak of some such; but was it for sins of thought against the tenth Command?
A61532	It seems then there was a division in the Council about it; but how could that be if there were a Catholick Tradition about this Rule of Faith?
A61532	Nay, how came Ruffinus himself to fall into the very same prodigious mistake?
A61532	Now if this were a Catholick Tradition, how was it possible for the Fathers of the Council to divide about it?
A61532	Or was S. Jerom''s Judgment above the Pope''s?
A61532	Or with common discretion if the Church did receive those Books for Canonical?
A61532	Or, as the Guide admirably saith, If the present Universality be its own Judge, when can we think it will witness its departure from the true Faith?
A61532	Q. Dost thou believe that thou shalt come to Heaven, not by thy own Merits, but by the virtue and Merit of Christ''s Passion?
A61532	Quasi materia: What is this quasi materia?
A61532	That is not said; nor if it were would it signifie any thing; for doth any imaginary holiness of the Tongue sanctifie ignorant Devotion?
A61532	The Glosser there saith, Whence comes this consequence?
A61532	The Matter is the external or sensible Sign; and what is that in this New Sacrament?
A61532	The Roman Correctors could not bear this; and say in the Margin, immo confert; this is plain contradicting; but how is it proved from the Canon Law?
A61532	The great Question among us, is, Where the true ancient Faith is; and how we may come to find it out?
A61532	The main Point in this Debate is, whether true contrition be required to Absolution or not?
A61532	The present Guides of the Catholick Church?
A61532	These are good Arguments against himself for how can such Acts then become meritorious without a Promise?
A61532	To what purpose then are all those Rules?
A61532	To what purpose then are we told of some modern Translations, as long as the use of them is forbidden by the Pope''s Authority?
A61532	Was not this a way to know the Tradition of the Church by the Offices used in it?
A61532	Was the Western Church agreed before or after about this matter?
A61532	What Church doth he mean?
A61532	What Scripture, what Fathers, what Tradition was there, before Peter Lombard, for just that number?
A61532	What Tradition did appear then for another Rule of Faith in the 14th Century?
A61532	What Universal Tradition then had the Council of Trent to rely upon in this matter?
A61532	What a mockery, were this, if there were no Publick Discipline then left?
A61532	What account can be given of this matter?
A61532	What hath the Priest then to do, but to declare him reconciled?
A61532	What if Rupertus thought the Bread might become the Real Body of Christ by an Union of the Word to it?
A61532	What now follows from hence?
A61532	What now is the Reason, that such Questions and Answers were no longer permitted, if the Churches Tradition continued still the same?
A61532	What then?
A61532	What was the matter?
A61532	When all the Cano ● ists, according to Almain, and some of the Divines, opposed it?
A61532	Whether the Words of Consecration are to be understood in a Speculative or Practical Sense?
A61532	While the rest were anointing, one of the Priests was to pray, pristinam& immelioratam recipere merearis sanitatem; what was this but bodily health?
A61532	Why not, are the matter?
A61532	Why so?
A61532	Why so?
A61532	Why such a term of Diminution added, as all men must understand it, who compare it with the expressions about the other Sacraments?
A61532	Will they condemn themselves?
A61532	Wilt thou teach the People by Word and Example, the things which thou learnest out of holy Scriptures?
A61532	against a Catholick Tradition?
A61532	how can satisfaction be any part of the Sacrament, which may be done when the Effect of the Sacrament is over in Absolution?
A61532	in continual Confession of her sin?
A61532	more than in the time of Methodius and Cyril?
A61532	to confirm matters of Faith?
A61532	unless it be first proved, that it is necessary to Salvation to receive an unwritten Rule of Faith, as well as a written?
A61550	1. relates to any thing beyond the beginning of the Gospel, and that Christ the Word, was before John the Baptists Preaching?
A61550	10. from the 30. to the 39?
A61550	And I only desire to know whether you think the Evidence of Sense sufficient, as to the true Body of Christ, where it is supposed to be present?
A61550	And I pray what follows?
A61550	And I pray, into what would you resolve it?
A61550	And I pray, now tell me seriously, did the Tradition of Transubstantiation lie unquestion''d and quiet all this while?
A61550	And did you know the difference between the Substance of Flesh and Fish by your Tast?
A61550	And hath God revealed the Doctrine of the Trinity to the Church in this Age?
A61550	And is it not rather a justification of that sense, which they took his words in?
A61550	And what then?
A61550	And why may not St. Chrysostom mean so here?
A61550	And why not as well in any other?
A61550	Are there not strange things in them concerning the Eucharist?
A61550	Are those Accidents then the Body of Christ?
A61550	Are you in earnest?
A61550	Are you sure that Origen said this?
A61550	As for instance, can we not know a Man from a Horse, or an Elephant from a Mouse, or a piece of Bread from a Church?
A61550	As to what?
A61550	But I pray tell me, do you think the Fathers had no distinct Notion of a Body and Spirit, and the Essential Properties of both?
A61550	But I pray, Sir, what say you to what I have been discoursing?
A61550	But are there no other things impossible to be done?
A61550	But can we not know the difference of one Substance from another, by our Senses?
A61550	But doth this prove, that the Substance of the Bread is changed into the Substance of Christ''s Body?
A61550	But how is it possible for you to know it was so well known, if they spake not of it?
A61550	But how should we know their Faith but by their Works?
A61550	But is it not impossible for the same Body to be in two different times?
A61550	But is there any Greatness like that of Divine Honour?
A61550	But may not God advance a mere Creature to that Dignity, as to require Divine Worship to be given to him by his fellow- creatures?
A61550	But still how shall it be known that the Church received this Doctrine unanimously, if they do not speak expresly of it?
A61550	But suppose he did, must he enter with his flesh and bones, and not much rather by a peculiar presence of his Grace?
A61550	But suppose the Question be, about the Sense of these places which relate to the Churches Authority, how can a Man come to the certain Sense of them?
A61550	But that is not discerned by the Senses, he saith: and if it were, will he say, that the Substance of Bread is the Body of Christ?
A61550	But to make this more plain, Do you make any difference between Nature and Person?
A61550	But what if there be as great a repugnancy from St. Augustin''s Argument, for a Body to be present in several places at once?
A61550	But what is all this to the Testimony of the Christian Fathers?
A61550	But what is this to the Eucharist, you may say?
A61550	But what saith he?
A61550	But whence come you to know that the Church is to give the Sense of the Scriptures?
A61550	But where doth that speak of Transubstantiation?
A61550	But, doth this prove that there is no Unity of Nature between the Father and the Son?
A61550	Can you hold your Countenance when you repeat these things?
A61550	Did you not tell me, you would avoid Impertinencies?
A61550	Do not all things comprehend the Heaven and Earth?
A61550	Do not you know, that these are rejected as Supposititious, by your own Writers?
A61550	Do not you see already?
A61550	Do we deny the truth of Christ''s Human Nature?
A61550	Do we live among nothing but Accidents?
A61550	Do you believe that there are any Mysteries in the Christian Doctrine above Reason, or not?
A61550	Do you mean the same which the Church of Rome doth by it, in the Council of Trent?
A61550	Do you not say so in plain terms?
A61550	Do you then in earnest give up the Fathers as Disputants to us; but retain them as Believers to your selves?
A61550	Do you think Bellarmin could produce any thing like this for Transubstantiation?
A61550	Do you think I should not presently deny your Example, and say, your very Supposition is Heretical?
A61550	Do you think all hard words are akin, and so the affinity rises between Apollinarists and Transubstantiation?
A61550	Do you think one Creature can create another?
A61550	Do you think that Irenoeus believed the substance of Christ''s Body was turned into the substance of our Bodies, in order to their nourishment?
A61550	Doth Irenoeus say so?
A61550	Doth not the Scripture say, there are some things impossible for God to do?
A61550	Doth this look like correcting a dangerous mistake in the Jews?
A61550	Expresly against it?
A61550	For I pray what doth he mean when he saith, he believes from Christ''s own Words, that it is the Body of Christ?
A61550	For, how is it possible for extended Parts to have no Relation to Place?
A61550	God or the Church?
A61550	Have I not hitherto owned, that there must be something incomprehensible by us, in what relates to the Divine Nature?
A61550	Have a little Patience; Did not Christ design by his Doctrine to root out those false Religions?
A61550	Have you observed what the Fathers say about the difference of Body and Spirit?
A61550	How can this hold, if the Body of Christ can be in Heaven and Earth at the same time?
A61550	How can those men want Proofs, that can draw Transubstantiation from these Words, which are so plain against it?
A61550	How doth it appear?
A61550	How doth that appear?
A61550	How then can the Creation prove an Infinite Power?
A61550	I hope you allow his Epistles?
A61550	I pray answer me one Question, Did you ever keep Lent?
A61550	I pray tell me what you mean by a Body, as it is opposed to a Spirit?
A61550	I pray tell me, Were there not false Religions in the World when Christ came into it to plant the true Religion?
A61550	I pray tell me, doth the difference between God and his Creatures, depend on the will of the Church?
A61550	I pray tell me, have you any certainty there is such a thing as a material Substance in the World?
A61550	If so be then it appears more difficult in an infinite and incomprehensible Being, what Cause have we to wonder at it?
A61550	If the Question be, how the same individual Nature can be communicated to three distinct Persons?
A61550	If this were the same, what need any distinction?
A61550	Into no Reason?
A61550	Is it from the Scripture, or not?
A61550	Is it lawful by the Christian Doctrine to give proper Divine Worship to a Creature?
A61550	Is it not as repugnant for a Body to be after the manner of a Spirit, as for a Body and Spirit to be the same?
A61550	Is it not more wonderful, as Bellarmin observes, that there should be one Hypostasis in two Natures, than one Body in two Places?
A61550	Is it the Accidents he speaks of before?
A61550	Is it the Substance of Bread?
A61550	Is it then in the Churches Power to give that to a Creature, which belongs only to God?
A61550	Is not here one Sense more than you believe?
A61550	Is that your meaning?
A61550	Is there a perpetual Miracle to deceive our Senses?
A61550	Is there any real difference between the Nature of a Body and Spirit?
A61550	Is there no difference between the Perception of Sense, and the Evidence of Sense?
A61550	Is there not the same Repugnancy for a Body in Heaven to be upon Earth, as for a Body upon Earth to be in Heaven?
A61550	Is this it which chokes your Reason, so that you can not swallow the Doctrine of the Church in this matter?
A61550	Is this possible to be reconciled with your Notion of a Body being present after the manner of a Spirit?
A61550	Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your Law, I said ye are Gods?
A61550	No?
A61550	Nothing more, but that St. Augustin disproved it, because his Body could not be at the same time in the Sun and Moon, and upon Earth?
A61550	Or can we know nothing beyond them?
A61550	P. All this proceeds upon the old Philosophy of Accidents: What if there be none at all?
A61550	P. And what do you infer from hence?
A61550	P. And what now would you infer from hence?
A61550	P. And what of all this?
A61550	P. And what then?
A61550	P. Are not the Divine Persons Infinite, as well as the Divine Nature?
A61550	P. But doth not Tertullian say afterwards, That the Bread was the figure of Christ''s body in the Old Testament?
A61550	P. But if the Three Persons be Coëternal, how is it possible to conceive there should not be three Eternals?
A61550	P. But was not Theodoret a Man of suspected Faith in ● he Church?
A61550	P. But what is it which makes one not to be the other, when they have the same common Nature?
A61550	P. But what say you to the Athanasian Creed; is not that repugnant to humane Reason?
A61550	P. But what say you to the damning all those who do not believe it, in the beginning and end of it?
A61550	P. But what will you do with it now you have it?
A61550	P. But where is it, that such Divine Worship is required to be given to Christ in Scripture?
A61550	P. Doth not Tertullian say, That it had not been the Figure, unless it had been the Truth?
A61550	P. Have not learned and acute Men doubted of the Divinity of Christ, as of Transubstantiation?
A61550	P. Have you any more that talk at this rate?
A61550	P. How can there be an Union possible, between two Beings infinitely distant from each other?
A61550	P. How do you make that appear?
A61550	P. How is that?
A61550	P. Is it not said elsewhere, That he that keepeth his Commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him?
A61550	P. May not God communicate his own Worship to him?
A61550	P. Methink you are very long upon this Argument; when shall we have done at this rate?
A61550	P. That is strange: Is not the Church often spoken of in Scripture?
A61550	P. That must be tried; What say you to Ignatius?
A61550	P. The Substance?
A61550	P. Then you think the Trinity can be proved from Scripture?
A61550	P. What a strange Question is this?
A61550	P. What are they?
A61550	P. What can we mean else?
A61550	P. What do you mean?
A61550	P. What doth all this signify, but that the Authority of the Church must determine whether there be two Natures, or two Persons in Christ?
A61550	P. What follows?
A61550	P. What have we been about all this while?
A61550	P. What have we to do with the Apollinarists?
A61550	P. What means all this ado before you come to the Point?
A61550	P. What of all that?
A61550	P. What say you then to the Mystery of the Incarnation?
A61550	P. What say you to Eusebius Emesenus?
A61550	P. What say you to St. Cyprian de Coena Domini?
A61550	P. What think you of the Acts of St. Andrew, and what he saith therein, about eating the Flesh of Christ?
A61550	P. What would you draw from hence?
A61550	P. Wherein I pray, did that Heresy consist?
A61550	P. Who doubts of that?
A61550	P. Who were they?
A61550	P. Why do you suspect me before I begin?
A61550	P. Why not?
A61550	P. Why not?
A61550	P. Why not?
A61550	P. Why not?
A61550	P. Why; what is the matter?
A61550	P. Will not you let a Man shew a little Jewish Learning upon occasion?
A61550	P. Yes; but how far is this from the business?
A61550	Sclater, Edward, 1623- 1699?
A61550	Suppose now we grant all this, that there is an incomprehensible Mystery in the Incarnation, what follows from thence?
A61550	That the substance of the Elements is gone: Where lies the Consequence?
A61550	Then why may not the greatest Body be within the least?
A61550	Then you have an extraordinary Tast, which goes to the very Substance?
A61550	This is the utmost your Cause will bear; but I pray tell me, Is there any such thing as a Repugnancy in the Nature of things or not?
A61550	VVho could possibly understand this of the old Creation?
A61550	Was it the Substance of Flesh you abstained from, or only the Accidents of it?
A61550	Was this Argument of the Apostle good or not?
A61550	Was this indeed your meaning?
A61550	Was this possible or not?
A61550	Were the Gentiles guilty of Idolatry in that respect, or not?
A61550	What Comfort will that be to you, when you are called to an account for your self?
A61550	What Texts do you mean?
A61550	What again?
A61550	What do you mean by Gods Instrument in the Creation?
A61550	What do you prove from this place?
A61550	What if you do not hear his Voice, do you not see him lying before you?
A61550	What if you had been to dispute with Nestorius and Eutyches?
A61550	What is it, I pray, to believe?
A61550	What is this It?
A61550	What is this to Transubstantiation?
A61550	What say you to a Pope, whom you account Head of the Church?
A61550	What then is to be said to such expressions of S. Chrysostom?
A61550	What then makes the same Impression on our Senses when the Substance is gone, as when it was there?
A61550	What then?
A61550	What think you now of the Proofs of the Trinity in Scripture?
A61550	What think you of making the time past not to be past?
A61550	What think you of the Manichees Doctrine, who held that Christ was in the Sun and Moon when he suffered on the Cross?
A61550	What think you of this?
A61550	What think you then of St. Augustin, who makes it impossible for a Body to be without its Dimensions and Extension of Parts?
A61550	Whence comes the certainty of the Substance, since your Senses can not discover it?
A61550	Wherein did this Inconsistency lie?
A61550	Wherein lies it?
A61550	Wherein lies it?
A61550	Wherein lies the nature of that which you call proper Divine Worship?
A61550	Which have run much in my Mind: For if the holy Spirit instruct us, what need is there of an Infallible Church?
A61550	Who doubts but there are other sorts of Unities, besides that of Nature?
A61550	Who then is to be judg what belongs to God, and what not?
A61550	Who was there that opposed things before they were thought of?
A61550	Why may not an Elephant be caught in a Mouse- trap, and a Rhinoceros be put into a Snuff- box?
A61550	Why not as to the Trinity, which to my understanding, is much plainer there, than the Churches Authority?
A61550	Why not then in two or more different Places; since a Body is as certainly confined, as to Place, as it is to Time?
A61550	Will you make the Power of God to change the Essential Properties of things, while the things themselves remain in their true Nature?
A61550	Will you promise to hold close to the Argument your self?
A61550	Will you prove that?
A61550	Will you undertake to explain that to me?
A61550	With Coccius or Bellarmin, you mean; but before you produce them, I pray tell me what you intend to prove by them?
A61550	Without any Reason?
A61550	Would you hence infer an Unity of Nature between Christ and Believers?
A61550	You put very odd Figures upon Tertullian: I appeal to any reasonable man, whether by the latter words he doth not explain the former?
A61550	but where is the Second?
A61550	that a Man''s Head, and Shoulders, and Arms, should be contained entire and distinct under the Nail of his little Finger?
A61550	the Homilies on Philogonius and the Cross?
A61550	there are such and such Accidents belong to every one of these; but our Senses are not so extraprdinary to discover the Substances under them?
A01532	& c. Quid laborat intellectus, vbi magister est aspectus?
A01532	( And is it not as impossible then, for one to bee in two places at once?)
A01532	( And why not as impossible for one subiect to haue diverse accidents, as diuerse seates, sites, qualities, and quantities at once?
A01532	* Quasi ad singulos quosque cunctantes adhuc voc ● corporea vtatur& dicat, Quid turbati estis?
A01532	146. e Quis audeat opinari vel Christi corpus spiritale non resurrexisse, vel si spiritale surrexit, iam non corpus fuisse sed spiritum?
A01532	17. g Quae est ista noua& stulta sapientia, nouitatem quaerere in visceribus vetustatis?
A01532	25. z Quis tam stultus est, vt i d quo vescitur, credat esse Deum?
A01532	47. p Hoc est manducare cibum qui non perit,& c. Quid paras ventrem& dentes?
A01532	61. as Chrysostome vnderstandeth him, when hee saith, Doth this scandalize you?
A01532	An ignoras nudum nec à decem palaestritis despoliari posse?
A01532	And againe hauing demanded, Why is that holy housell then called Christs body and his blood, if it be not truely that that it is called?
A01532	And againe, what is there in Iustines relation, that is not found in our Protestanticall( as he tearmeth it) communion?
A01532	And doe not all Sacraments the same?
A01532	And doe they not say the same of Baptisme, and of all mysteries or Sacraments in general?
A01532	And doe you beleeue that you are made partaeker of Christs body and blood?
A01532	And doth not the Apostle say as much of the ministery of the word; that m no man is sufficient, or n worthy enough for such a worke?
A01532	And doth not their Cyril( as before you heard) deny the oyle also after it is consecrate, to be any more l common oyle?
A01532	And doth the Priest then offer nothing to God but accidents onely?
A01532	And how call you the juice of the fruite of the Vine?
A01532	And how did they then eate and drinke Christ, but spiritually by faith, and loue, and doing his wordes?
A01532	And how is this then the very same with that, when it is in an vnbloody manner performed?
A01532	And if he had had any thing of moment to say against this our exposition, why did hee not then produce it, where the place was discussed?
A01532	And is there any such foode or fruit at all that is no physicall substance, or that consisteth of e meere accidents?
A01532	And say not we as much?
A01532	And was not the morsel that Christ gaue Iudas, poison to Iudas that tooke it?
A01532	And what is this but to say that all that doe truly beleeue in Christ are not saued?
A01532	And what is this more then wee also say?
A01532	And what is this, but the very same that we say?
A01532	And what of all this?
A01532	And what should hinder but that remaining so, they should retaine still their old names?
A01532	And when the same Christ confirmeth and saith, This is my Blood, who can doubt, and say it is not his blood?
A01532	And who is so impious, say I, as to eate thus that which he thinketh to be God?
A01532	And who saith they do?
A01532	And why doe they so?
A01532	And why must the blessing then of necessity import such a change more in the one Sacrament then in the other?
A01532	And why so?
A01532	And why so?
A01532	And why there?
A01532	And will they not beleeue what the Apostle saith, or what Christ saith?
A01532	And yet if it were Christ, to whom should he direct his speech more fitly then to it?
A01532	And yet what is more common among them then s by Comparisons and similitudes to shew how in one nature there may be a plurality of persons?
A01532	And yet who euer dreamed therefore of any such Transubstantiation in Baptisme?
A01532	Are Christs body and blood those temporall gifts and good things, that God by Christ daily createth and quickeneth?
A01532	But I demand how it appeareth that Gregorie that sent Austin, held Transubstantiation?
A01532	But after sanctification how doe you call them?
A01532	But dare any say that his Disciples were so prophane as to baptise without blessing?
A01532	But doth Augustine tell vs that wee must not beleeue that there is bread there, though our eyes informe vs, that there is?
A01532	But followeth it thence that I hold the thing it selfe for the manner of effecting it to haue no difficulty at all in it?
A01532	But how doth he proue it?
A01532	But how doth this follow; The Apostle doth so there: therefore our Sauiour doth so heere?
A01532	But how doth this trister prooue that he was not Bishop of Rome?
A01532	But how prooueth this that Christ therefore spake there of a sacramentall eating of it?
A01532	But if wee respect that that is intended in them, who seeth not that it can not be corrupted?
A01532	But is hee come to that now, Christ is spiritually in the Sacrament?
A01532	But must it needes bee corporall; or else it is none at all?
A01532	But what speake I of two Bodies?
A01532	But what take I so much paines g to set vp a light when the Sun shines?
A01532	But where is it then?
A01532	But where is ought in the Text that inti nateth this miraculous conuersion?
A01532	But who is hee then, saith Baronius?
A01532	But who seeth not what a silly and senselesse consequence this is?
A01532	But yet will you see another as grosse as the former?
A01532	By telling vs that Christs glorified bodie is incapable of renting: which if it be so, how saith Pope Nicholas that it is torne in pieces?
A01532	Can any thing be more plaine?
A01532	Did any man euer before heare of a body without bignesse?
A01532	Did any man in his right wits( thinke wee) euer expound Scripture on this manner?
A01532	Did euer man( thinke we) either sober or in his right wits thus reason?
A01532	Did hee thinke that any one not voyd of common sense would not soone see this?
A01532	Did hee thinke that his Reader would not cast an eye on them, whem they were verbatim set downe before him?
A01532	Did this fellow( thinke we) vnderstand what he said?
A01532	Did this man thinke that these things would euer be examined?
A01532	Doe not the ancient Fathers hold the Trinitie an vnsearchable mysterie?
A01532	Doe not very many of their owne writers herein agree with vs?
A01532	Doe the Fathers tell vs that in this holy Mystery we must not so much regard what our sense informeth vs, as what our faith apprehendeth?
A01532	Doe we alone thus expound that place?
A01532	Doe you not know that God called his body Bread?
A01532	Else how doth the substance of the one passe into the substance of the other?
A01532	For commenting on those words, h Wherein doe we pollute thee?
A01532	For first, Are they diuerse gifts that God the Father had giuen and that Christ would giue?
A01532	For how can hee be contained in that that is not?
A01532	For how can that passe into it, that is not at all?
A01532	For how is it not annihilated, if nothing remaine of it?
A01532	For must we not beleeue the Apostle as well as Christ?
A01532	For what are Signes and Sacraments but reall parables?
A01532	For what is a body made of bread but a breaden Body?
A01532	For what is a body of bread( as was said before) but a breaden body, as a pot of earth, an earthen pot, a dish of wood, a wooddendish?
A01532	For what wonder is it for a man to eate one thing thinking vpon another; bread( for example) remembring our Saviours passion?
A01532	For when some of them that heard it, murmured, our Sauiour said, t Doth this scandalize you?
A01532	For who but a babbling ignorant Person would as he doth there, make such an inference?
A01532	For who is carried in his owne hands?
A01532	For, a If we regard those visible things( saith Augustine) wherewith we administer the Sacraments, who knoweth not that they are corruptible?
A01532	He saith that the mysteries of Christ are most admirable and inscrutable: and who denieth it?
A01532	How can I stretch mine hand to Heauen, there to lay hold on him?
A01532	How farre is this carnall, poore, vnlearned man from the holy Fathers spirit and doctrine, as I haue formerly cited their assertions?
A01532	How hang these things together?
A01532	How is he in bread where no bread is?
A01532	How is it then that their S. Clement giueth S. Iames such charge as you heard before of it, least some foule abuse befall Christs body?
A01532	How many toyes are there in theirs that are not touched at all in Iustine?
A01532	How much more, when so many of all sorts, of so speciall repute, shall so vniformely speake for vs, and herein accord with vs?
A01532	How prooueth hee that these Fathers so expound that place?
A01532	How stand now these speeches and prayers with their Transubstantiation?
A01532	I might with Aug. well in a word answer this Question: How( saith he) shall I hold Christ when he is not here?
A01532	If Christs body bee in an indiuisible manner there, what is it that is there broken?
A01532	If Christs very blood bee poured out in it, how is it an vnbloody offering?
A01532	If corporally, why doth this fellow sticke at it, and is so loath to acknowledge it?
A01532	If hee be hid there, how saith Bellarmine, that o hee is there visibly vpon the board?
A01532	If it may be said to haue beene of bread, why may it not be said that once it was bread?
A01532	If no bread bee left in the Eucharist, how said hee before, that Christ is there contained in bread; and that the ancient Fathers so affirme?
A01532	If spiritually onely, why vrge they those passages of Iohn 6. to prooue 〈 … 〉 corporall and bodily manducation of Christs body in the Eucharist?
A01532	If the Sacrament of the Altar bee but bare bread and wine, why doest thou so absurdly speake and blasphemously praey vnto it, in this manner?
A01532	If the whole substance of it be destroyed so that nothing remaineth of it, how doth the whole substance of it passe( as hee saith) into Christs body?
A01532	Is Christs humanity then turned into his Deitie?
A01532	Is it not abused when the drunken Priest speweth it vp againe?
A01532	Is this Sacrifice of theirs a repetition of Christs sacrifice?
A01532	It is true that some Heretickes; yet not the Eutychians( how should they argue against Christs Deitie, that held his humanity wholly turned into it?)
A01532	It is true that you say: But why did he thus change the Names?
A01532	No: He telleth vs expressely, that there is bread there, as our eyes doe informe vs. And what can be more euidently or plainely spoken?
A01532	No?
A01532	Nonne buccella Dominica venenum fuit Iudae?
A01532	Now 1. what is this to mine Argument?
A01532	Now how doth the Orthodoxe disputer answer this?
A01532	Now what do the ancient Fathers hereunto answer?
A01532	Now what is here spoken but of Mysteries or Sacraments in generall, applied after in particular, as well to Baptisme as to the Eucharist?
A01532	Now where is there here any mention of an Host?
A01532	Now who( I pray you) doubteth of, or denyeth ought that is here said?
A01532	Of a body that is truly?
A01532	Or any Angell to cary him vp and present him before his Father in heauen, in whose presence and sight he is continually there?
A01532	Or can he tell me, how our Sauiours body went out of his Sepulcher, without remoouing that huge stone, rolled afterward by the Angell from it?
A01532	Or do those of theirs build onely vpon the clause he here mentioneth?
A01532	Or doth not Baptisme the like?
A01532	Or hath c Christ now assumed the nature of Angels, and so is now become a Spirit?
A01532	Or how doth Pope Nicholas tel vs that Christs y body it selfe is sensually broken?
A01532	Or how he pierced the solide and huge Orbes of heauen in his ascension without making any hole in them?
A01532	Or how hee entred the house, the doores being and remayning still shut vpon his disciples; as for a great miracle the Euangelist recounted?
A01532	Or how is hee h yet present with his faithfull ones, but that hee is infinite and true God?
A01532	Or how is not this a riddle?
A01532	Or how is there no bread there, where in bread the Sonne of God is( as he telleth vs) conteined?
A01532	Or how saith hee a little after that Christ, as a louing Spouse, doth there visitt and imbrace vs?
A01532	Or is his credit so meane already that he need not feare to bee discredited, that hee dare vse such sorry shifts as these are?
A01532	Or is it not absurd to place u Abels fatlings and x Abrahams Ramme in equipage with the body and blood of Christ Iesus?
A01532	Or is it not abused, when it is burnt by them and vsed like an Hereticke?
A01532	Or may not the same truly be said of the Sacrament of Baptisme, and the administration of it?
A01532	Or may we not say truly as the Auncients also oft doe?
A01532	Or needeth Christ the Priest to entreate his Father to looke propitiously vpon him?
A01532	Or what did our Sauiour breake at his last Supper?
A01532	Or what is this tothe purpose?
A01532	Or when it is deuoured and swallowed downe by mice and rats?
A01532	Or who would be so absurd as to say, I giue you my selfe to be a memoriall of my selfe?
A01532	Perhaps thou wilt say; I see another thing: How prooue you to me, that I take the bodie of Christ?
A01532	Praecepisti vt credamus, expone vt intelligamus Quomodò est panis corpus euis,& calix, vel quod habet calix, quomodo est sanguis eius?
A01532	Quare?
A01532	Quid enim tam presens est inter absentes quam per epistolas& alloqui& audire quos diligas?
A01532	Quid non malo ● um prutiat?
A01532	Quomdo tenebo absentē?
A01532	Quomodò tangeret, cum ad Patrem ascendiss ● t, nisi forte fidei profectu& mentis ascensu?
A01532	Seest thou water?
A01532	Si ad i d, quod per illas ● es agitur, quis non videat, non posse corump ●?
A01532	That Christs body may be ten thousand thousand times( and why not ten thousand thousand bodies of Christ then?)
A01532	The other Signe, how call you it?
A01532	To what purpose?
A01532	What Sacrament also is there, wherein or whereof such speeches are not vsed?
A01532	What call you the gift that is offred before the Priests Inuocation?
A01532	What if you shall see the Sonne of Man ascending where hee was before,& c?
A01532	What if you should see the Sonne of Man ascend where before he was?
A01532	What is become( I maruell) of that carnall and corporall presence then, that they prate so much of?
A01532	What is it then, that( as Origen speaketh) goeth into the draught?
A01532	What is this but that which Bellarmine condemneth in the Lutherans, to forge vs m a Christ impanated, or enclosed in bread?
A01532	What not mysticall, but mistie riddles are these?
A01532	What then if you shall see the Sonne of Man ascend where before he was?
A01532	When the souldiers opened Christs side with a speare, what saith the Euangelist did then issue on t?
A01532	When we see him, and touch him, as this fellow telleth vs else- where?
A01532	When your Children shal aske you, What seruice is this that you obserue?
A01532	Where is any tittle here that may stand well with their Transubstantiation?
A01532	Where say I, that Christ is no otherwise conioynrd with the Sacrament, then the land with the Indenture and seale of it?
A01532	Who denied euer a communication of Christs body and blood in the Sacrament?
A01532	Who doubteth with vs of the truth of Christs body and blood?
A01532	Why may not we as wel reason on this wise?
A01532	Why might not( as Ierome speaketh) p the creature giue way to the Creator; as q the iron gate did to Peter?
A01532	Why sticketh our vnderstanding, where our sight is our Teacher?
A01532	Will you heare more yet of Theodoret?
A01532	Will you see how grosse and palpable this euasion is?
A01532	Would any man that had either braines in his head, or wit in his braine, answer in this manner, or reason on this wise?
A01532	Yea but he acknowledgeth the holy seruice then and there to be performed, to be too worthy for him to deale with?
A01532	Yea or thus either?
A01532	Yea so Gregory of Valence, My flesh that I will giue, p that is, that I will offer for the life of the world: Where( thinke we) but on the Crosse?
A01532	Yea, is Christs body it self impassible?
A01532	Yea, is it bread when it is broken?
A01532	a The Bread which we breake( saith the Apostle) is it not the Communion of Christs Body?
A01532	and Chrysostome, that z by it we become flesh of his flesh, and bone of his bone?
A01532	and checke vs for n belying them when we say that any such thing is maintained by them?
A01532	and for want whereof they so much vilifie the Protestantical Cōmunion?
A01532	and is it not bread when it is eaten?
A01532	and the bread which we breake, is it not the communication of Christs body?
A01532	as if hee had said; Are you scandalized because I said being now, present with you, I will giue my flesh for food?
A01532	but in the selfe same subiect, wherein formerly they were?
A01532	h Quid vidisti?
A01532	h Quid à mure comeditur cum sacramentum corroditur?
A01532	h What seest thou?
A01532	how blockish and sottish that beleeue them?)
A01532	i For to how many men could his body haue sufficed to eate of?
A01532	is able to conceiue how this can happen in man?
A01532	m Quomodo mittam manuum in coelum?
A01532	much lesse that soundeth ought that way?
A01532	o Tell me; the mysticall Signes which are offred God by Gods Priests, what say you are they Signes of?
A01532	or affirming that Host to be aboue him or better then himselfe?
A01532	or any testimony more pregnant?
A01532	or by what nec ● ssity of consequence doth the one follow from the other?
A01532	or how is it the very same with Christs sacrifice on the Crosse, if it bee not it, but a memoriall of it onely?
A01532	or how scapeth the Priest from being a destroier of Christ?
A01532	or making any speech at all to it?
A01532	or must a bald, yea a Baals Priests blessing of bread at this day be needes more effectuall then their blessing of water then was?
A01532	or must we not beleeue Christ as well in one place as in an other?
A01532	or of one that is not truly?
A01532	or that in the Church of Rome it was then held?
A01532	p How( saith he) say they that the flesh perisheth and liueth not euerlastingly, that is nourished with the body and blood of Christ?
A01532	q Monstra quis tanta explicet?
A01532	quomodò in coelum manū mittar, vt ibi sedentem teneam?
A01532	r Do you not know that the Lord called himselfe a Vine?
A01532	r Now how deny they the flesh to be capable of life eternall, that is nourished with Christs body and blood?
A01532	r Quam Deus sacramentis suis disciplinis que vestiuit, cuius munditias amat, castigationes probat, passiones adpreciar, haeccine non resurget?
A01532	r. before?
A01532	s Though there were some ambiguity( saith hee) in our Sauiour Christs words, yet it is taken away by Councels;( what Councels think we?
A01532	t The Bread,( saith Hicrome,) that the Lord brake, and gaue his Disciples, is the Lords body: And if we aske, how Bread is or can be Christs body?
A01532	was this man( thinke we) euer a disputant, that answereth Arguments on this wise?
A01532	what is it but that I say?
A01532	what should he speake to him as sited else- where, when hee hath him corporally there present?
A01532	when( if we may beleeue Bellarmine) he is visibly present with vs?
A01532	where should he speake more plainely and perspicuously then there; where his maine aime is to make things cleere?
A01532	which part of my Syllogisme( I pray you) is this Answer applied to?
A01532	yea dare any Christian man say otherwise, but that the water in Baptisme being once consecrated, is no more* common Water?
A01532	yea let them looke backe but a line or two, and they shall soone see, how little Irenaeus fauoureth their cause?
A01532	z But is Christ then so often slaine?
A01532	“ Could not Christ doe as much as some Magitians haue done?
A01532	“ Quod Magis licet, hoc Domino non licet?
A66142	*** Did not Christ himself appeal to them for the proof of his own Rising?
A66142	112. p. 808. proposes this Question: An Corpora& aliae Sanctorum Reliquiae VENERANDAE sint?
A66142	89. Who was it but the true God for whom Elijah appear''d so zealous?
A66142	A modest Enquiry, Whether S. Peter were ever at Rome, and Bishop of that Church?
A66142	After what manner it is that the Church of Rome prays to God through the Merits of Her Saints?
A66142	Ages since, of the Virgin Mary, whose very Body he sees the Priest about to make now before his Eyes?
A66142	An Answer to the Question, Where was your Church before Luther?
A66142	And I desire Monsieur de Meaux to tell us, who ever said or thought they did?
A66142	And I once more Appeal to your own Conscience, whether you never read in Monsieur de la B''s?
A66142	And are not these now rare Follies for a Man to force us to publish whether we will or no?
A66142	And can you in Conscience say that they RETURN''D PEACEABLY TO YOU?
A66142	And can you not be quiet, without bringing the best Wits of the Nation, and F. Warner, a Jesuit, upon your head?
A66142	And does not St. Paul urge this very consideration against the Athenian Idolatry?
A66142	And has he not but very lately sent a † † † † † † Universal Indulgence throughout their whole Church?
A66142	And here who can chuse but admire the Power of Truth?
A66142	And if we may, how will you justifie your self from being grosly uncharitable in thus insinuating upon so slender a ground, that we are not?
A66142	And indeed was there ever less reason to believe his Remedies, than in this Case there is to Credit your Pretences?
A66142	And is not the Divine Nature as excellent now, and as much debased by yours, as ever it was by their Representations of it?
A66142	And is not, WE SUPPOSE, as conformable to the design of an Exposition, and as little fit for a proof, as WE BELIEVE?
A66142	And is this then in your Opinion such daring Doctrine?
A66142	And many Centuries pass without One probable Instance of any that did it?
A66142	And might I not say the same of the other Ministers his Brethren in your Diocess, were I as well acquainted with their Conditions?
A66142	And now let any reasonable man consider what a pitifull Vindication is this, to support so much Clamour and confidence?
A66142	And that no one can come to the Father but by him?
A66142	And that the Homilies contain''d a wholsome and Godly Doctrine, which in their Consciences they believed to be false and pernicious?
A66142	And therefore the holy Gospel has herein armed us before hand; our Lord himself saying, Woman, what have I to do with thee?
A66142	And upon what unchristian foundations the benefit of this practise is established by you?
A66142	And was I not horribly to blame, to call such fine Notions, Reveries?
A66142	And was there nothing of Violence in all this?
A66142	And were you not resolved utterly to confound us, when you alledged such Proof out of Holy Scripture as this?
A66142	And what has your Lordship now to except against this?
A66142	And what more unreasonable and foolish, than to call our desires of each others Prayers by such Titles as these?
A66142	And what shall I say more?
A66142	And when they farther ask''d him, How then he had written so copiously and learnedly about it?
A66142	And when we saw our Error, alter''d our Opinion?
A66142	And who can tell, what Time and Changes may one day bring forth?
A66142	And why is not the Blood of Christ which cleanses the greatest Sins, a sufficient Purgatory for the least Infirmities?
A66142	And why shall we not hope that this in time shall be the issue?
A66142	And why shall we think St. Chrysostome the only ridiculous man, to use such a Phrase as no man in the World ever did, or would have done besides?
A66142	And will you yet say there has been nothing of Violence in your Diocess?
A66142	And yet after all, Has no one, my Lord, even of these, suffered Violence either in his Person or Goods?
A66142	And yet what should he do?
A66142	Are my interests in the Church of England so great, or my expectations otherwise so low in the World; as to prompt me to such Villany?
A66142	Are not the Incarnation, Death, Resurrection and Ascension of our Lord, the most Fundamental Articles of our Faith?
A66142	Are not these, Sir, weighty Arguments?
A66142	Are not these, my Lord, almost the very words of your Exposition?
A66142	Are our Lives so scandalous, or our Writings so destitute of all sense of Religion, as to speak us to be govern''d only by Malice and Int ● rest?
A66142	Are we stronger than He?
A66142	Are ye yet, or ever like to be agreed among your selves about it?
A66142	As to the main foundation of all Whether the Saints hear your prayers?
A66142	As to your Question, why we dedicate our Churches to God?
A66142	At quis nostrum hoc dicit?
A66142	But 2dly, Be the Sins, as they desire, Venial; how do''s it from hence follow, that it is necessary that these be punish''d in another Life?
A66142	But 2dly, What have we here to do with the Remission of Sins?
A66142	But are not these Abuses still cherish''d in his Church?
A66142	But can any one Imagine, that the Church when in Grots and Caverns should teach one thing, and when it came into the light practise another?
A66142	But did not those Fathers do somewhat more than this?
A66142	But did you never make such an impression, though you did not, nor do not yet care to own it?
A66142	But does any one add, This is my Body, fall down and Worship it?
A66142	But does this therefore reduce all the Prayers you make to the Saints, in whatever Terms they are conceived, to this One Form, PRAY FOR US?
A66142	But have you any thing to excuse you, if you are mistaken?
A66142	But how then will you clear your self?
A66142	But if the Question be, Whether the Charge of Idolatry, as it is managed by us against the Church of Rome, may not be apt to cause any such mischief?
A66142	But if you can not dispense with these things for our common Conversion, how shall we believe that you can do it to satisfie a private Proselyte?
A66142	But is he sure the Bishop meant so?
A66142	But is there any thing of this in the Primitive Rituals?
A66142	But is this all that is implied in the Act of calling upon them to pray for us?
A66142	But may not God forgive the Guilt as to the Obligation it lays upon us to Eternal punishment, and yet retain it as to a Temporal one?
A66142	But now if our Author will not allow this to be good arguing against them, with what reason do''s he go about to urge it against us?
A66142	But now what is all this, to your praying to God to hear you by the Merits of the Saints?
A66142	But now wherein did it consist?
A66142	But pray, Sir, where is the necessity, that because we have not so much Ceremony as you, we must be further estranged from Devotion too?
A66142	But still how does this appear?
A66142	But this is perfectly to astonish us, and too plainly shews that some mens assurance is without bounds, as well as without reason: For what?
A66142	But were these Oblations to deliver them out of Purgatory?
A66142	But what at last did this Persecution amount to?
A66142	But what can be done to Men that are obstinately bent to serve a Cause?
A66142	But what if I had made some Additions to a printed Impressions?
A66142	But what if St. James''s word be****** general, and may very well be extended to all these?
A66142	But what is this Other Manner?
A66142	But what now does our Catholick Expositor say to all this?
A66142	But what now is the Matter?
A66142	But what now is this shifting?
A66142	But what then is it that this Historian designed?
A66142	But what then means the Council of Trent, to tell us, That we are not only to honour them, but to worship them too?
A66142	But where is there any mention of any thing of this kind either threatned or done in another Life?
A66142	But where then is my unsincerity?
A66142	But where then is the Misrepresentation?
A66142	But why do I thus long insist upon Probabilities?
A66142	But yet notwithstanding all this, Do not some of our Writers confess, that the Papists Interpretation is more rational than the Lutherans?
A66142	But you deny that any of your Church have ever held any such Doctrine?
A66142	But, 3dly, Where at last do you find that I ever said, that you granted that we held ALL which you esteem to be fundamental?
A66142	But, Sir, setting Calumny apart, Whence is it that you derive this Charge against us?
A66142	By what Authority does he condemn these Prayers, these innocent Wishes and holy Raptures, as he calls them, as fond things, vainly invented?
A66142	Cajetane anticipating this Objection, That to Vow is an Act of Supreme Religious Worship; and how then may it be given to the Saints?
A66142	Can all their Expressions be fairly reduced to such Apostrophe''s?
A66142	Can any one imagine that the Church when in Grots and Caverns taught one thing, and when She came into the light practised another?
A66142	Can any thing, say they, be more express?
A66142	Can you deny the Fact?
A66142	Can you say that these Presumptions are not reasonable against you?
A66142	Could it defend its self, I do not say from publick Enemies, or private Robbers, but even from the very Vermine, the creeping things of the Earth?
A66142	Cum certum sit ibi esse Corpus Christi, quid opus est disputare num Panis substantia maneat, vel non?
A66142	Cur non probat ullo exemplo?
A66142	Did Ahab worship Baal or the Sun as a Corporeal Deity, so as to exclude all Sense and apprehension of a Superiour, Spiritual and Invisible Godhead?
A66142	Did ever any Mountebank set out his false Ware with greater Vanity, than those of the Church of Rome have here done theirs?
A66142	Did not here also above a Thousand years pass before any one attempted it?
A66142	Did not the holy Angel twice refuse it from St. John?
A66142	Did not their own Hands form its substance, and their Mouths speak it into a God?
A66142	Do men use to say that the Heaven is worthy to be called the Heaven?
A66142	Do not all these speak plainly to us what the Nature of this Worship is?
A66142	Do not your own principles evidently shew the contrary?
A66142	Do they not put up Bills over their Church Doors and Altars, almost every Sunday, to vend them on this Account?
A66142	Do they not so much honour the Image of an Apostle or Martyr, as the Apostle or Martyr in presence of the Image?
A66142	Do we provoke the Lord to Jealousie?
A66142	Do you not here see somewhat, which your Council of Trent calls the Idolatry of the Gentiles?
A66142	Do you your selves understand what you mean by it?
A66142	Do''s my saying that ye must eat my flesh, and drink my Blood scandalize you?
A66142	Do''s this, says he, Offend you?
A66142	Does Diodorus Siculus say that the Egyptians worshipp''d only the Stars, without any Notion of Heroes and Demons?
A66142	Does Monsieur de Meaux allow of this?
A66142	Does he tells us that a Divine Worship may upon any account be paid to an Image?
A66142	Does not the Church of Rome lay any Obligation on particular persons to joyn with her in the Invocation of Saints?
A66142	Does not the Pope still dispatch them abroad, and his Missionaries preach them now as shamefully almost, as when Luther first rose against them?
A66142	Does she condemn those only who refuse it out of Contempt, and with a spirit of dissention and revolt?
A66142	Does she not pray to it, that in this time of the Passion, it would strengthen the Righteous, and give Pardon to the Guilty?
A66142	Excepting only an Error or two, that''s the most, of the Press; has he given any one Example of this?
A66142	For did not God himself command two Cherubims to be made, and used in his worship?
A66142	For having proposed the Question in these terms, Whether the Reliques of Saints are to be ADORED?
A66142	For how could he speak after this manner, if Jesus Christ be still upon Earth by his real Presence under the species in the Eucharist?
A66142	For instance; What if the Priest had uncovered the Cross all at once?
A66142	For is not the Eucharistical Bread and Wine, in a higher degree than any of their Idols were, exposed to the same raillery?
A66142	For it is granted on all sides: But whether this Conversion be Sacramental and Figurative?
A66142	For might not the Heathens have defended themselves the very same way?
A66142	For tell me now I beseech you: If we unite our selves to your Church, will you not oblige us to go to Mass with you?
A66142	For tell me now, I beseech you, O ye Worshippers of dead men?
A66142	For the other part of your Charge, Interest: Were a Christian capable of being led by so base a Motive, yet how comes this to inspire us against you?
A66142	For what benefit?
A66142	For what did he demonstrate here, and say was his Body, but that which he gave to his Disciples?
A66142	For what if Monsieur Jurieux were such a One as you pretend?
A66142	For what is it to engage us to this, that the Ancients thought hereby to distinguish the best of Men from our Saviour Christ?
A66142	For what is that but to say, that God has( in effect) made them partakers of his Immensity?
A66142	For who would not laugh at that Man that should seriously argue after this manner?
A66142	Had not the Israelites a good Intention to hold a feast unto the Lord, when they Worshipped the Molten Calf?
A66142	Had their Wafer, if such then was their Host, any voice, or life, or motion?
A66142	Has God revealed it to you?
A66142	Has he not promised that whatsoever we ask the Father in HIS NAME, we shall receive it?
A66142	Has he not told us that he is the Way, the Truth, and the Life?
A66142	Has the Church of Rome ascribed no other vertue to Images, than to excite in us the remembrance of those they represent?
A66142	Has your Diocess escaped the rigour but of any one of these?
A66142	Hath God more Respect to Man on Earth, than he hath to Christ in Heaven?
A66142	Have I Calumniated them in any thing?
A66142	Have I Misrepresented their Doctrines?
A66142	Have any of your General approved Councils positively defined this to be all your Design in them?
A66142	Have his holy Apostles written it?
A66142	Have not the Clergy on your side as great a Command over the Consciences and over the Purses too of their Flock, as on Ours?
A66142	Have the Holy Scriptures defined it?
A66142	Have the Jesuits been condemned for teaching Men to swear by it?
A66142	Have we any other Argument to warrant our belief of these, but what comes to us by the ministry of our Senses?
A66142	Have we no Service of God in our Churches?
A66142	Have we not an Advocate in Heaven, Jesus Christ the righteous, who is the sole and full propitiation of our sins?
A66142	Have ye any probable proof of it?
A66142	Have you never, Sir, your self heard us recommend with all Earnestness, the practice of this Piety to our Congregations?
A66142	He doubts, whether a few such Copies could be PROPERLY CALLED AN IMPRESSION: And now to add my supposal to all the rest, What if this were the Case?
A66142	He that can not be saved by Faith in Christs Blood, how shall he look to be deliver''d by Mans Intercessions?
A66142	He that is alive prayeth, or offereth the Sacrifice; what shall this advantage the dead?
A66142	Hereupon he explains himself yet farther; — But now if any one should ask of us, whether we make Christ absent from the Holy Supper?
A66142	His Real Presence in the Eucharist, out of the act of communicating, not excepted?
A66142	How far we allow that Salvation is to be had in the Church of Rome?
A66142	How far we must depend on the Authority of the Church for the true Sense of Scripture?
A66142	How far we must depend on the Authority of the Church for the true sense of Scripture?
A66142	How long wilt thou suffer this dishonour?
A66142	How shall I be favourable unto thee?
A66142	How shall they call upon Him in whom they have not believed?
A66142	How shall they call upon him in whom they have not believed?
A66142	How shall they call upon him in whom they have not believed?
A66142	How should we go forth with the highest transports to welcome them into our Communion?
A66142	How such Persons may become Guilty of it?
A66142	How this Practice by degrees crept into the Church?
A66142	How this may be done by them?
A66142	How vain the Attempts of those of the Church of Rome have been in their Disputes against us?
A66142	I doubt not but those who teach us this Doctrine have thought of it more than once; but have they well consider''d it?
A66142	If Christ be only Man, why is a Man called upon as a Mediator in Prayers, seeing the calling upon a Man is judged of no value to give Salvation?
A66142	If Christ be only Man, why is any Hope put in Him, seeing that Hope is represented as Accursed that is placed in Man?
A66142	If it be true; Can you yet escape the charge of rashness and uncharitableness, to damn whole Churches for so needless a matter?
A66142	If it were, how will this agree with his true and onely Notion of Idolatry?
A66142	If it would, I should be glad to know what part of his definition it is that makes it to be so?
A66142	If these indeed be your thoughts, let us plainly know the impiety of them?
A66142	If they intend really what we suppose, and what their words do certainly signify; what Ingenuity can it be to impose upon us in the Declaration?
A66142	If you have indeed the Liberty to do this, why do ye not use it, and remove so great a stumbling block as this out of our way?
A66142	In Answer to my demand, Whether upon ANY ACCOUNT WHATSOEVER the Image of our Saviour and of the Holy Cross were to be worshipped with Divine Worship?
A66142	In St. Paul''s Phrase, to change the truth of God into a lie, by representing the Incorruptible God by an Image made like unto a Corruptible Man?
A66142	In a word: Is the Church of Rome contented to teach only that the Mass may very reasonably be called a Sacrifice?
A66142	In what doubt is your Bishop of Meaux still in his Exposition, and you know he was once in a great deall more?
A66142	In what sort of Writings were these Holy Men defective?
A66142	In which those grievous punishments are to be undergone for the expiating of a soul from sin?
A66142	Is it a point of Faith to believe, that among so many Priests, not one of them is a Cheat and an Impostor?
A66142	Is it any Crime for one upon good grounds to change his Mind in this Case?
A66142	Is it any where written?
A66142	Is it not certain that if we err, we have yet both Christs Institution, and the practice and Opinion of many Ages to absolve us?
A66142	Is it not necessary, nor universally received, to believe that these Indulgences satisfy for the temporal Pain of Sin?
A66142	Is it that He advises the Worshippers of the Holy Virgin, not to think that she has any Merit but what she received from her Son?
A66142	Is it that our Saviour Christ has not compassion enough for us, that you go to others as more merciful?
A66142	Is it to be believed, that they Addressed to those as Mediators and Intercessors with God, for whom they themselves interceded to God?
A66142	Is not his Holiness still esteem''d the Churches Treasurer?
A66142	Is not this rare stuff?
A66142	Is not this the very thing we charge you with, and which you have been so weakly endeavouring to perswade the World you did not do?
A66142	Is not this think you fit to be considered by him?
A66142	Is not this, Sir, a most edifying Prayer for a Church, calling her self Catholick, to use?
A66142	Is that all the use they make of them?
A66142	Is there any of the Evangelists that mentions it?
A66142	Is there so much less of Interest to be carried on in the Church of Rome than in the Church of England?
A66142	It was a nice Question put by Porphyry, to an Egyptian Priest, How the Sun, Moon and Stars could be Gods, seeing the Gods are incorporeal?
A66142	Lastly: Since the prevalence of this Doctrine in the Church, what Opposition has it met with?
A66142	Let us see, IIdly, Whether you do not seek to these Sacred Monuments for Help and Assistance?
A66142	Mais quand l''aurois adjousté des Cartons à unè impression deja faite?
A66142	Might not the people have had the same zeal by beholding the Cross, to adore him that suffered upon it?
A66142	Much more would All those who now write or speak against you, come over to you, wherein I pray would their Worldly Concerns lose by their so doing?
A66142	Must we therefore become mens Enemies because we tell them the Truth?
A66142	Nay, but what now if neither of these were Author of that Hymn?
A66142	Nay, does but so much as One single Rubrick in all your Offices give us the least Intimation of it?
A66142	Nay, what if instead of bending their Knees three times before they kiss''d it, they had done it but once, or not at all?
A66142	Nor is it whether Christ be taken Really, but whether he be taken in a Spiritual or in a Natural Manner?
A66142	Not any Julian that had malice enough to publish their Confusion?
A66142	Not to deal too strictly with you; Let us allow these Seven Spirits to signifie Created Angels; What will be the Consequence?
A66142	Now then was this Idolatry by the Law, or was it not?
A66142	Now what is this but to mock God in his solemn service?
A66142	Now when all this is already done, to what end is it that they should be tormented?
A66142	Now, what if one that had hitherto done nothing to forfeit his Reputation, should begin to do such notorious ill things as to deserve our Censure?
A66142	On the other side, who can tell whether the Priest has consecrated, or indeed whether he be capable of consecrating?
A66142	Or can you dare for our sakes to alter your Service, and leave out all those things that relate to the Blessed Virgin and to the Saints in it?
A66142	Or can you with any shadow of sincerity say, that this is as opposite to your Exposition, as Heaven and Earth to one another?
A66142	Or is our Liturgy so unapt to excite Devotion in those who duly attend upon its Offices?
A66142	Or is there nothing of Violence either to Mens Persons or Goods in them?
A66142	Or rather, did not Monsieur de Meaux here also mollifie the known Doctrine and practice of his Church?
A66142	Or were not the Senses judges of those Miracles?
A66142	Or what is it, Sir, that we must do to satisfie you, that we are not utterly estranged from Devotion?
A66142	Or whether it be Natural and Bodily?
A66142	Or will you purge all these too in Order to our Conversion?
A66142	Or, did they perhaps do all this?
A66142	Or, was it, 2. that they did not refer their Worship finally to God, but terminated their Adoration upon the very Image it self?
A66142	Quid dignum tanto feret hic promissor Hiatu?
A66142	Quid ergo dicendum de conversione substantiae Panis in Corpus Christi?
A66142	Quid illo praestantius acumine, exercitatione, doctrinâ?
A66142	Quid intentantibus Gladios, novasque excogitantibus ● poenas?
A66142	Quis Orandus sit?
A66142	Reperiremus& vos ipsos eadem sentire, quae nos — Sed studiis facere quid pervicacibus possumus?
A66142	Secondly, Having thus resolved against your first foundation, that Images are to be Adored; He next enquires, what Worship is to be paid to them?
A66142	Shall I tell you freely what I think?
A66142	Shall their good Intentions secure them?
A66142	Shall we be excused from having any thing to do with your Litanies and Processions, your Vespers or your Salves?
A66142	Should we put our Prayers into an unknown Tongue, that if not the Zeal, yet at least the Wonder and Astonishment of the People might be increased?
A66142	Si enim unius, quomodo idquod inconfusum est, quomodo quod indivisibile, quomodo unitio dicitur aliquando?
A66142	Si sit consectus de aquâ rosaceâ vel alterius distillationis, dabium est an conficiatur?
A66142	Sirs, Why do ye these things?
A66142	So that now the Prayers are profitable again; but then what shall we do to keep off Immensity from being attributed to the Creature?
A66142	Spectatum admissi risum teneatis Amici?
A66142	TO this Question whether our Works are to be called truly and properly Satisfactory?
A66142	That Berenger should be one of the first that should begin to Credit his Senses, to Consult his Reason, or even to Defend his Creed?
A66142	That He spoke to the Sun, and it stood still, the Lord OBEYING the Voice of a Man?
A66142	That does not present him to God as his only Sacrifice and Propitiation?
A66142	That does not protest that he has nothing to offer him but Jesus Christ, and the Merits of his Death?
A66142	That he believes him to have Ascended into Heaven, and behold he is yet with us upon Earth?
A66142	That men can presume in the Face of the World to deliver such falsities?
A66142	The Sun, worthy to be called the Sun?
A66142	The difference( you say) between us is, Whether it be lawful for us to beseech or intreat them to pray for us?
A66142	The true state of the Question betwixt us, he says, is, Whether the Protestants or Papists do innovate?
A66142	They have declared already against you, and they will in honour stand up for John Sergeant, and then what will become of you?
A66142	This indeed is no consequence, according to the Rules of Logic, as Bellarmin acknowldges; but how then does it follow?
A66142	This is confess''d: What will you infer from thence?
A66142	This is in short the sum of that Ceremony; In which you desire to know what is Amiss?
A66142	This is my Body; Is it possible for words to be spoken more clear and positive?
A66142	To be call''d c c c a wilful and bold Calumniator?
A66142	To be nick nam''d, a Thersites with a f f f steel''d Impudence?
A66142	To be nick- nam''d, a Knight of the Post, that writes without fear, shame, or wit?
A66142	To be told, you are a Careless, d d d Open, and Confident Liar?
A66142	To desire the blessing of God upon that which he has expresly forbidden us to make, for any such purpose as that, for which it is here consecrated?
A66142	To maintain a kind of Fellowship and Communion with them?
A66142	To take it as we do, you confess can have no danger, are you sure that to deny it as you do, may not be a Sacriledge?
A66142	To testifie their Hopes of a future Resurrection?
A66142	To what a state are we arrived?
A66142	To what purpose this?
A66142	Upon which I conjured him to tell me, as far as he could guess at it, what the Will of God was, whether that I should Kiss his Feet, or He mine?
A66142	Utrum Crux Christi sit adoranda adoratione LATRIAE?
A66142	Utrum Reliquiae Sanctorum sint ADORANDAE?
A66142	Utrum factâ consecratione remaneat in Hoc Sacramento formá substantialis Panis?
A66142	Was it ever mention''d for above a Thousand years?
A66142	Was it ever objected to them, that they themselves did the same: Worship a Deity whose substance they first formed, and then spoke it into a God?
A66142	Was it, 1. that they worshipped God by an Image?
A66142	Was not Christianity first founded upon the Miracles of our Blessed Saviour and his Apostles?
A66142	Was not he driven from la Ferté even before the Edict of Nantes was revoked?
A66142	Well, Sir, said I, to be short with you, why will you run your head against a Wall?
A66142	Well, be it so; what will he hence infer?
A66142	Were all they a parcel of Seditious Fellows too?
A66142	Were any Roman Catholicks banish''d, or put to death for their Religion?
A66142	Were the Laws turn''d against them; or any Dragoons sent to convert them?
A66142	Were they therefore not Idolaters for it?
A66142	Were this Worship Idolatry, or not?
A66142	What Grounds they have for this Adoration?
A66142	What Grounds this Superstition had in the Fourth Century?
A66142	What Honour ought we to render to the Blessed Virgin?
A66142	What Schisms has it caused?
A66142	What brake he, but that which he took?
A66142	What can be done with such a Man as this?
A66142	What consequence can they draw from thence against me upon account of those Alterations?
A66142	What couldst thou have done more, if thou hadst been his Enemy?
A66142	What did he give to his Disciples, but that which He brake?
A66142	What do''s your Lordship now offer to excuse your Prevarication in so clear a matter?
A66142	What does all this avail to the pretences of the Vindicator?
A66142	What end is there to be served in this?
A66142	What have you here done?
A66142	What if we mistook those Men for Honest Men, who at the bottom were not so?
A66142	What infinite Debates have there risen about it?
A66142	What is it to me, would he say, whether there be any Law that commands you to murder or rob, or no?
A66142	What is there in all this to allow it to be lawfull to give worship TOWARDS an Image, but not to it?
A66142	What kind of Conversion is there made?
A66142	What little Cause those of the Church of Rome have to complain of the Evils of Heresie and Schism?
A66142	What meer Harangue is this?
A66142	What new Donatists, Gentlemen, are you, to presume to exclude us from this Character?
A66142	What not as WE SUPPOSE?
A66142	What our Reasons are against this Service?
A66142	What should they now do?
A66142	What the True Doctrine and Practice of the Church of Rome is, as to the Point of INVOCATION of SAINTS?
A66142	What then is the Churches sense concerning that Honour which it renders to the Saints departed?
A66142	What to deliver her Soul out of Purgatory?
A66142	What would T. G. have given to have met with such a Consequence in his Learned Adversary?
A66142	What, not as Christ there, no way as to his Humane nature?
A66142	Where are the Unsincere dealings, the Falsifications, the Authors Miscited, or Misapplied?
A66142	Where in Holy Scripture do''s he find the name JEHOVAH, or the LORD attributed to any other but the true God?
A66142	Where is that Christian that does not by Faith unite himself to his Saviour in this holy Communion?
A66142	Where now is the difference?
A66142	Where( say you) do I find any thing of this in the 39 Articles?
A66142	Wherefore do''s he say this?
A66142	Whether God ever refuses any thing to the Blessed Virgin?
A66142	Whether Papists or Protestants have sought the most advantagious Means for the redressing of them?
A66142	Whether a Christian that is devout towards the Blessed Virgin can be damned?
A66142	Whether a Visible Succession from Christ to this day, makes a Church which has this Visible Succession, an Infallible Interpreter of Scripture?
A66142	Whether a Visible Succession from Christ to this day, makes a Church which has this Visible Succession, an infallible Interpreter of Scripture?
A66142	Whether a tender and constant Devotion towards the Blessed Virgin, be not a mark of Predestination?
A66142	Whether according to the Scripture- Notion of IDOLATRY, those may not be guilty of it, who yet both know and worship the One True GOD?
A66142	Whether all the Prayers that are made to the Saints by those of the Church of Rome, are fairly to be reduced to this One Sense, PRAY FOR US?
A66142	Whether all the Prayers that are made to the Saints by those of the Church of Rome, can fairly be reduced to this One Sense, PRAY FOR US?
A66142	Whether formal or substantial, or what else?
A66142	Whether it be Lawful to pray to the Saints, after the manner that is at this day prescribed and practised in the Church of Rome?
A66142	Whether it be Lawful to pray to the Saints, to PRAY FOR US?
A66142	Whether it be by that WONDERFUL and singular CONVERSION which their Church calls so aptly TRANSUBSTANTIATION?
A66142	Whether it be good to make Vows and Pilgrimages to the Honour of the Virgin?
A66142	Whether it be lawful to pray to the Saints to PRAY FOR US?
A66142	Whether the Church of England can make out such a Visible Succession?
A66142	Whether the Church of England can make out such a Visible Succession?
A66142	Whether the Church of Rome( whatever her reason be) does hold that Images are truly and properly to be worshipped?
A66142	Whether the Intercession of the Blessed Virgin to God for us, be not only profitable, but necessary to our Salvation?
A66142	Whether the Roman Catholicks ought to maintain their possessions of these Doctrines, or to quit them as Erroneous?
A66142	Whether upon all Sundays and Holydays?
A66142	Whether, according to the Scripture- Notion of Idolatry, those may not be guilty of it, who yet both Know and Worship the One true God?
A66142	Whether, according to the Scripture- Notion of Idolatry, those may not be guilty of it, who yet both Know and Worship the One true God?
A66142	Who is it you mean, when you say, I have a mind to expose YOUR Literature?
A66142	Who shall be judge when this Tradition is Universal?
A66142	Who was it that composed that exorbitant Hymn, yet used in your Church, Ave Maris Stella, but your devout St. Bernard?
A66142	Who were they that Sainted Thomas à Becket, and have applauded even the Assassines of some Princes since, but the venerable Heads of your Church?
A66142	Why are you a Catholic?
A66142	With what confidence could they have rallied them as they did, for worshipping gods which their own Hands had made?
A66142	With what simplicity do the Ancient Fathers speak of this Communion in all their Writings?
A66142	Would not such an Invocation of my Friend, think you, suppose him to be more than a Brother, or a Man?
A66142	Would your Lordship have made such supposals in our favour, had not your Conscience here got the better of your Reason?
A66142	Yet what shall we do in those Cases where the very Nature of the Service utterly refuses such kind of Colours?
A66142	You bid us Adore the Holy Sacrament: Has Christ prescribed it?
A66142	You command us to pray to Saints and Angels: Does not St. Paul forbid it?
A66142	You command us to worship Images: Is it not evident that both the Law and the Gospel have forbid it?
A66142	You command us under pain of your Anathema to believe Transubstantiation?
A66142	You had ask''d me in your Vindication, What Authoritie have you to oppose us?
A66142	You pray to God, that he would bless the Wood of the Cross; to what purpose, I pray, give a blessing to the Stock of a Tree?
A66142	You run out into a great length about the Invocation of Saints: But is it to Answer any thing we had replied to your Arguments on that Subject?
A66142	You will not insist upon Dionysius, nor upon Justin Martyr, nor upon Irenaeus: But what then will you insist upon?
A66142	and for damning us, only because we dare not venture to cut off those from Christ for whom he died, and whom we hope he will in mercy receive to him?
A66142	and is it not confess''d, that both the Apostles and their Successors abhorred the very name?
A66142	and not rather plainly have told us that it became the VERY BODY of Christ?
A66142	and permit an unbounded Superstition to run to these Excesses?
A66142	and whether they be such as, should they be mistaken in it, will be sufficient to excuse them?
A66142	does he look upon these Precepts as Obligatory to us now?
A66142	du Perron, has utterly rejected the Authority of Origen, as an incompetent Witness in matter of fact, and that especially in the very Point before us?
A66142	his Manhood; how do these Pictures insensibly breed a mean Opinion of him, in the minds of the Ignorant and Unwary?
A66142	may I not here at least beg leave to think, that out of the abundance of your heart, your hand wrote this?
A66142	or but any one time in a mans whole life?
A66142	or finally not at all, neither living nor dying?
A66142	or once in five years?
A66142	or only once a year?
A66142	or, Whether whatsoever we receive, be not a Reward that is given us only through God''s Acceptance, and promise in Christ Jesus?
A66142	p. 24. where you grant, that what we hold is the ancient and undoubted Foundation, and only deny that it is intirely so?
A66142	should it be false, how will you escape that Anathema your selves; you have then so falsely as well as uncharitably denounced against us?
A66142	would he prove to us, that therefore they ought to be put to Death by us under the Gospel too?
A66142	would this have been Idolatry according to the Law?
A66142	— And therefore( says he) what End shall there be of Disputing, what measure of speaking, if we must always answer those that answer us?
A66142	— For is not this rare Ca nt?
A66142	— God calls it a Blessing, and dost thou Lament?
A66142	— Is not this, think you, wonderful Reasoning?
A66142	— Then he enquires, whether therefore we take away the Presence of Christ''s Body from the Sacrament?
A66142	— that they ought not to give the same Titles to Her as to God; — nor make her Equal with God and Jesus Christ?
A66142	‖ ‖ ‖ Were there no Apostates that could tell them of this secret before?