Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier	question
A93516	s.n.,[ London?
A34075	This horrid Blasphemy is the import of all Perjury, the very Image of the False- Swearers Thoughts, and can any thing be more wicked?
A70287	And as concerning the Angels Swearing, to which of the Angels said he, Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee?
A70287	s.n.,[ London: 1666?]
A56129	A ● d can it then bee a miserie and Judgment to us?
A56129	And can it bee then any happiness ● and no judgement unto us to bee without ● King?
A56129	For their calamity shall rise suddenly, and who knoweth the ruine of them both?
A42479	13. Who hath required these things at your hands?
A42479	Quis credet Paulum praec ● p ● i D ● minici suisse ● mm ● m ● rem?
A44847	Reply ▪ What needed one to be given by S. F. when thou gavest one thy self?
A62568	61. that he being asked by the high Priest, Art thou the Christ the Son of the Blessed?
A62568	And what can more directly overthrow the great end and use of oaths, which are for confirmation, and to put an end to strife?
A62568	For what can be a greater affront to God, than to use his Name to deceive men?
A62568	When the Son of man comes, shall he find Faith on the earth?
A91204	And is not this plain way of God, the safest for you and the Army to follow, yea the only short cut to peace and settlement?
A91204	So had Alexander, but Alexander was poysoned, and what then became of his Army?
A91204	are they so deep in the hearts of the people, that they can assure themselves the newtrals, or those who have gone farre with them will quiesce?
A91204	or army yet got so much love?
A27406	And many Nations shall be joyned unto the Lord in that Day; In what Day?
A27406	And when the Keeper of the Prison said unto Paul and Sylas, Sirs, what shall I do to be saved?
A27406	Then shall they be built in the midst of my People; what People?
A27406	],[ London?
A33303	It must be of things within our povver: or else to engage our selves by a vow to impossibilities, what is it but to prophane the sacred name of God?
A33303	Pay therefore that which thou hast vowed?
A47520	And if the Oaths were not Lawful, why did you take them now?
A47520	And why this uncharitable Censure that''t was because K. James being now fled, he must either take the Oaths or lose his Living?
A47520	If the Oaths were Law ● ● ● 〈 ◊ 〉 did you not take them before?
A54117	At least to maintain Charity by, If our sentiments of the Intention of the Text are not the same?
A54117	But since none can be so orthodox as that deliver''d to us in Gods Book, why should we press the point further?
A54117	Or how can we frame a better General to Center In?
A54117	Who can Determine with equal Authority to that of the Holy Ghost?
A54117	Who can express His mind Apter?
A54117	s.n.,[ London: 1698?]
A34536	Have the Majority of them as so many single Persons severally declared such a meaning, as is suggested in the Objection?
A34536	Or can it reasonably be imagined that they would ever so declare?
A34536	Or is there any other Evidence or convincing Reason to be produced for it?
A34536	Or that in the third Part, they intended the abjuring of all kind of endeavour, and not that only which the Law forbids, or is not warranted by Law?
A34536	Whether the words do signifie a just and good meaning according to a Rational Interpretation?
A44835	And why dost thou bring the Scripture that was spoken to the Jewes, and apply it to the Christians?
A44835	Did ever any of the Apostles so in the Primitive times?
A44835	Hast thou not taught people to swear, first one way, and then an ● ther?
A44835	John Tombs, IS it not a shame for thee, who art called a Baptist, thus to manifest thy sel ●, and divide thy self from thy own people?
A44835	or are we not to believe the Scripture as it speaks till again it be translated by him?
A45317	: 1700?]
A45317	WHether an Act of Parliament may not be void, and of none Effect in whole or in part?
A45317	Whither this be not such Matter of Religion, as ought to have been consider''d in a free National Synod, before it was past in an Act of Parliament?
A45317	s.n.,[ London?
A27407	And if the Lord hath so done, and so doth, ought not all those who are his Ministers upon Earth, to do the like?
A27407	And what if some now, as heretofore, believe not the Command of Christ, shall their unbelief make the Faith of God of none effect?
A27407	But, whether Christ hath forbidden all Swearing?
A27407	The thing in Dispute is not, Whether Christ did ever forbid any thing that was not of it self evil?
A48827	He attempted it when he was not half so deeply obliged, and can we think he will not pursue it now?
A48827	The Church- Men say King William is too kind to Dissenters; but hath he given them any other or more Liberty than King James did?
A48827	What a shadow of a Dream then must this be of Protestant Subjects, being happy under a bigotted Popish Prince of such a Temper?
A48827	Yet still what Grievances are these Taxes, in comparison of what is laid on the French Slaves, into whose Condition we were intended to be brought?
A52601	Is it not the preservation of Religion, where it is reformed and the Reformation of Religion, where it needs?
A52601	What do we vow?
A52601	What doe we covenant?
A52601	What is this but the contents and matter of our Oath?
A69859	Can there be evil in the City,( saith Amos,) and the Lord hath not done it?
A69859	He who was once our lawfull King, or he who by Force, or otherwise, hath dethroned this King, and is himself seated upon the Throne?
A69859	I ask then, What is the cause why we may lawfully own their Supremacy?
A69859	Is it the unlawfullness of their War?
A69859	Is not he rather to be called so, and to be look''d upon to be such, upon whom God hath transferr''d this Power?
A69859	The King de jure, or the King de facto?
A69859	The next Question is, Who is to be owned as supreme?
A69859	What can it be then?
A43269	But what if in the 4 th place the matter be purely indifferent?
A43269	But who sball be judge ef that?
A43269	For with that face can a man invoke that Mercy which he hath expressly renounced?
A43269	In order to give answer to the 2 d. query, how far such an oath doth extend?
A43269	Lord, who shall abide in thy Tabernacle?
A43269	What if a man swears, and doth not intend to swear?
A43269	What oath can then be too hard for men of this persuasion to swallow?
A43269	Whether an oath taken in words so comprehensive, doth oblige to the performance of every Statute?
A43269	Whether every one that hath thus sworn is guilty of a rash oath, as having sworn to more then he knows?
A43269	how just is it, that he who hath thus disclaimed Gods favour, should be forsaken when he stands most in need of it?
A43269	that he who hath thus abused the Holy Name of God, should not be heard when calleth upon that Name?
A43269	that is, who shall be accounted worthy to be a member of thy faithfull congregation here, and to be admitted into thy presence hereafter?
A43269	what can be more absurd then to, suppose that both these sins may be taken off, by adding a third sin of Hypocrisy?
A43269	who shall dwell in thy holy hill?
A28913	36. what shall we think of idle oathes, which signifie nothing but a profane and vain spirit, will not they inflame the reckoning exceedingly?
A28913	But was this any advantage to them, that they were so accustomed to evill, that they could not leave it?
A28913	Can the Aethiopian change his skin, or the Leopard his spots?
A28913	Canst thou draw out Leviathan ● ith a Hook?
A28913	If the Lord help not, how sad is the condition of any of us ▪ and shall we forfeit our Interest in it by breaking the Oathes we enter into?
A28913	Is not every mans particular burthen heavie enough for him to bear?
A28913	They also who regard not truth, judgement, and righteousnesse in their oathes, what reproof is sharp enough for them?
A28913	Thou shalt not forswear thy self,& c. was it not well said?
A28913	To swear falsly by the Name of the God of truth, how great a provocation is it?
A28913	What is it that was said by them of old time?
A28913	Where you find him exceeding solicitor to preserve his reputation from the stain of lightnesse; When therefore was thus minded did I use lightnesse?
A28913	or the things that purpose do I purpose according to the flesh, that with me there should b ● yea, yea, and nay, nay?
A28913	what madnesse to curse ourselves by our blessings?
A29793	And my Lord Cat himself not more rever''d;( Tho Robes Episcopal much Reverence draw) T''instruct and keep Parochial Mice in awe?
A29793	And now Obedience in a second Sphere, To their ador''d new Monarch does appear?
A29793	But who the Devil, if this be your way, Will ever value what you Preach or Pray?
A29793	Can you then murmur?
A29793	Come, come, Sweet- hart, you must resolve upon''t; Must I give place, Is''t fit that I should want?
A29793	Consider if I should your Wishes Crown, What a strange Noise''t would make about the Town, How many galling Censures must I bear?
A29793	Could any Man of Sense give such a Reason?
A29793	Does not your Conscience find the Scripture saith, Preserve thy self?
A29793	How many savoury Bits were mine before?
A29793	How much ill In every Age is done by Woman still?
A29793	How much unable was Mankind decreed To contradict, when Love and Beauty plead?
A29793	If Profit be your Aim, why wo n''t you swear?
A29793	Should any think Instruction out of season?
A29793	Suppose I should, what would the Subject say, That I thus long have seem''d to disobey?
A29793	Though that one Reason is enough, by Jove You''re safe, because''t is more than they can prove: Why, is it strange you should past Errors see?
A29793	Visitant W. What crack- brain''d Whimsie have you lately done?
A29793	Was''t not your Wife?
A29793	What can you mean by Preaching pro& con?
A29793	What''s Censure, to six hundred Pounds a year?
A29793	have I been one of those, On whom you long did formerly Impose?
A94740	6, 7. when the contrary was most true, and they will be found to be the faithful martyrs of Jesus?
A94740	Art thou well in thy wits who babblest these things?
A94740	As the Apostle Paul, though he said, what have I to do to judge them that are without?
A94740	Do not they seek to recover stollen goods, due debts?
A94740	It is not proved, that by the servants of the housholder, are meant the civil Magistrate, why not the Angels termed reapers?
A94740	Oh how can they be converted, if they be not permitted where the Gospel is preached?
A94740	Richard Hubberthorn thus saith, Is this a proof for men to swear and take oaths for men, or against men?
A94740	Saith Hubberthorn, Did not the Translator of the Bible understand Greek as well as John Tombes?
A94740	Saith he, Or are we not to believe the Scripture, as it spoaks, till again it be translated by him?
A94740	These Petitioners after make them the Apostles: will they have them to tolerate Idolaters in the Church?
A94740	We might make a Catalogue of Sauls, Davids, Solomons, and others oppressions in temporal things, shall we therefore deny their regal power in them?
A94740	Whence art thou to us a new interpreter of Laws?
A94740	hath not the man here lost the understanding of a man?
A94740	yea whence art thou an interpreter of our Laws, which thou didst not make?
A54038	And he that will venture to break this, what but Deceit and Treachery can be expected from him?
A54038	And what is it that binds?
A54038	For what is the substance and intent of an Oath?
A54038	How out of the World?
A54038	Is not Christ the Truth, the Substance?
A54038	Is not he that is in Him, the New- Creature?
A54038	Is not the Confessing of God by a Christian, of more weight, than the Swearing by Him from a Jew or Heathen?
A54038	Is not this the Bond of the Gospel?
A54038	Now, O King, shall not God''s People be faithful and obedient to the Lord as well as to thee?
A54038	Was it useful in the Innocent state?
A54038	Were not all the Oaths and Shadows of the Law, to last till Christ the Substance came?
A54038	and doth not this seal Truth, and keep to Truth more firmly, than the Oath under the Law could?
A54038	doth He call them from having any being or commerce in the Earth, or in the World?
A54038	is it the shadow, or the substance?
A54038	is it the words of an Oath, or the sense and weight of the thing upon the spirit?
A54038	is not the intent of it to bind to the speaking or performing of Truth?
A54038	or, Whether Christ alloweth his Disciples to swear in solemn Cases, as Moses did allow his Disciples?
A54038	or, did God appoint it there, when man could not but speak Truth?
A54038	or, is it useful in the Redeemed Estate, where a greater Bond is received, and professedly held forth, than the Innocency of Mans Nature was?
A70864	* And have they not been so more since and now, then ever before?
A70864	* Have they not since that in 1648. and now again effected it?
A70864	3, 4, 5. may be credited?
A70864	And Joshua called for them, and spake unto them saying; Wherefore have ye beguiled us, saying, We are very far from you, when you dwell among us?
A70864	Et cum dominus dicat, Nolite tangere Christos meos,& David: quis inquit, extendet manum suam in Christum Domini,& innocens erit?
A70864	Quae ergò spes talibus populis, contra hostes laborantes, erit?
A70864	Quae fides ultra cum aliis gentibus in pace credenda?
A70864	Quaere, whether this be not violated in every branch in the highest degree?
A70864	Quisenim adeò furiosus est, qui caput suum manu sua propria desecet?
A70864	Quod si in bello sides valeat, quanto magis in suis servanda est?
A70864	Vis ergò longè esse a perjurio?
A70864	c. 7?
A70864	or submit to any Oaths, Taxes, Edicts of theirs as Parliamentarie or legal?
A70864	quae in hostibus jurata sponsio stabilis permanebit, quando ipsis propriis Regibus juratam fidem non servant?
A70864	quod foedus non violandum?
A70864	to whom will ye flee for help, and where will ye leave your glory?
A36240	And can we think that all this Endearment and Obligation was designed to hire them only to a Neutrality?
A36240	And then how can they mean veraciously that they will not disturb the peace, in the sense of the present Possessors?
A36240	And what can they mean less by it than, that the Laws do also not own such a Possessor for a Rightful K?
A36240	And what will the Imposers gain by this unhappy victory over Consciences?
A36240	But it will then deserve a further enquiry whether the Duty of their former Oaths be consistent with such a meaning?
A36240	How can any thing be truly due to him who has no Right to it?
A36240	How can we, for shame pretend Conscience against Popery when secular Punishments do so easily and so universally drive us from our Principles?
A36240	It will therefore concern them to consider whether their Old Notions be any way consistent with this New Declaration?
A36240	Or how can he have a Right to that Allegiance, which is only the Right of lawful Kings, who is himself only a pretensed K. in deed, and not in Right?
A36240	Or how can they conceal the secrets of the K. de facto, against the K. de Jure, without breaking their former Oaths to the K. de Jure?
A36240	That is, Whether their Oaths to the K. de jure, be consistent with a Neutrality?
A36240	What would they say of Wives that should also take Husbands de facto, and promise and swear to give them all the Rights of Husbands de Jure?
A36240	of a truly due Allegiance, and not only of such a one as will be judged due by the Possessor?
A36240	that is, Whether they do not oblige them to be Active in contributing towards his Restauration?
A43978	Beleeve you that I am able to do this?
A43978	Beleevest thou this?
A43978	For what is more ordinary then reproaches of those that are rich, towards them that are not?
A43978	How can He or They be said to be subiect to the Lawes which they may abrogate at their pleasure, or breake without feare of punishment?
A43978	How then shal the Scriptures be fullfilled, which say, that it must be so?
A43978	The Eunuch said, Here is Water, what doth let me to be baptized?
A43978	The Keeper of the Prison, fell down before Paul and Silas, and said, Sirs, what shall I do to be saved?
A43978	Then sayd they unto him, what shall we do, that we might work the works of God?
A43978	When one saith, I am of Paul, and another, I am of Apollos, are ye not carnal?
A43978	Why seest thou the Mote that is in thy Brothers eye, and seest not the Beam that is in thine own eye?
A43978	Why therefore may not men that foresee the Benefit of Concord, continually maintain the same without compulsion, as well as they?
A43978	hath be not spoken also by us?
A43978	in these words, VVhat hath the Lord spoken but only by Moses?
A43978	or S. Paul so perfect a Christian presently upon his Conversion?
A43978	or how could the good Thief be thought sufficiently catechized upon the Crosse?
A43978	or of those that sit in place of Judicature, towards those that are accused at the Bar?
A43978	saith, that His Yoke is easie, should require a matter of that difficulty?
A75812	How have we looked for the time of healing and behold trouble?
A75812	How religious will they believe all leagues?
A75812	Is there no Balm in Gilead?
A75812	Now after all these Ordinances, who could be so undutifull as to entertain the least fear of being ever hereafter forc''d to accuse himself?
A75812	Shall we so far yeild to passion, as utterly deny them the immmunities of their Ancesters?
A75812	Where is our Justice to neighbours, equally entitled by their birthright to the same freedom with our selves?
A75812	Where is our charity to Christians, professing the same Saviour, and believing the same Scriptures, with our selves?
A75812	Why are these Oathes continued with so sharpe a double edge, that unavoidably they either cut the purse or kill the Conscience?
A75812	and without it, who can say his Religion is best?
A75812	is there no Phisitian?
A75812	what shall we( that accuse the Papists of blind obedience) say to our selves, when our very leaders are so short- sighted?
A75812	why then is not the health of the Daughter of my people recovered?
A47255	11. saith, Which of you shall have one sheep, and if it fall into a pit on the Sabbath day, will he not lay hold on it, and pluck it out?
A47255	4. that the weapons of Christians are not carnal?
A47255	9. Who can stretch forth his hand against the Lord''s anointed, and be guiltless?
A47255	And can we suppose there is greater care taken for a particular Member, than for the whole Body?
A47255	And is the Extent and Latitude of the Duty of Allegiance limited by declaritory and express Laws?
A47255	And where were those Liberties then you so much boast of now?
A47255	And, whether we are bound to Treat with him, and call him back, or no?
A47255	But were it not Grand Impiety, by violence to seize upon the Estate or Goods of a private Man, and dispose of it to others?
A47255	Especially when( by his own Option and Choice) he should place his personal Interest and Safety in opposition to that of the Publick Weal?
A47255	Has not a Conqueror power to impose what Laws he pleases upon those Vassels and Slaves he has conquered?
A47255	Has the Supream Magistrate no Authority to command our Obedience?
A47255	How can that be?
A47255	How could King Henry give and grant those things were none of his?
A47255	Suppose the Oath were made to God,( which in propriety of Speech is a Vow) how does that weaken or invalidate the force of the Argument?
A47255	Suppose we grant somewhat of Agreement or Paction, between the Conqueror and the English Nobility; what Advantage is that to us?
A47255	This is a pleasant Story indeed: Are the Subjects Liberties more Ancient than the Conquest?
A47255	What Sacriledge then must it be to Invade the Dignities Royal, and dispose of the Crown and Scepter?
A47255	What are these strong and binding Obligations?
A47255	What can be more clear or obvious?
A47255	What''s this but Passive Obedience you so much condemn''d in the beginning of this Discourse?
A47255	Where the word of a King is, there is power, and who may say unto him, what dost thou?
A47255	have respect only to the Protection and Safety of the King''s Person, without having any Relation to the Peace and Welfare of the Publick?
A47255	what more positively evinced, than Monarchy, Iure Divino, from these Texts?
A47255	— Enquiry into the present State of Affairs, and in particular, Whether we owe Allegiance to the King in these Circumstances?
A61528	And is it likely that they who have done so should be Enemies to the Government?
A61528	And what is an Oath good for, that will answer to none of these ends and purposes?
A61528	And what security can you have against the breach of a Second Oath, from one who shews apparently he values not his First?
A61528	But what shall we get by such Discoveries?
A61528	For if he should come in by Conquest, how can any single Subject hinder him?
A61528	If all men therefore would fulfil their Oaths of Allegiance and Fidelity, what need would there be of imposing any New ones?
A61528	If those who take the Allegiance- Oath, should chance to take( as who can tell?)
A61528	Men Honester or more Loyal than they were before, nor yet prevent them from being False and Traiterous, or shew us when they are so?
A61528	That will neither discover Truth nor Falshood?
A61528	They are, it seems, to be discovered by Refusing the Oath; but they intend to take the Oath, and where is the discovery?
A61528	This is a long History, you will think, tho I have greatly shortened it; but whereto does it serve?
A61528	Well, but will all that take the Oath of Allegiance take the Oath of Abjuration?
A61528	What should hinder one from taking an Oath of Abjuration, who has no regard to his Oath of Allegiance?
A61528	What think you of the Application?
A61528	Will not therefore those who refuse it, be thereby discovered to be Enemies to the Present Government?
A61528	Will therefore an Oath of Abjuration discover who are the King and Queens Enemies?
A61528	Will therefore any such Persidious Men as these be discovered by an Oath of Abjuration?
A31514	And how shall I be assured that it is his right, and that his pursuance is lawfull, that I may joyne with him?
A31514	Fourthly, whether can this Oath betaken in faith?
A31514	Hath not our Liturgy( though established by Act of Parliament) beene rejected as Popish?
A31514	I sweare never to relinquish this Protestation,& c. Quaere, Doth this clause bind me for ever in no case to alter?
A31514	If his Majesty be excepted, why is it not expressed?
A31514	Notwithstanding it hath beene allowed by our Doctrine and established by our law?
A31514	Quaere, What are those priviledges of Parliaments and rights of Subjects?
A31514	Quaere, What is the Doctrine of the Church of England?
A31514	Quaere, in what extent is Popery here abjur''d?
A31514	That were to expose the Kingdome to perpetuall contention; the Parliament?
A31514	The King and Counsel?
A31514	The dictate of every private mans conscience?
A31514	What if the King and State should find it expedient hereafter to revoake this Protestation, or some thing in it?
A31514	Whether am I alone bound to maintaine him in his rights, or only joyntly with others?
A31514	Whether am I hereby to engage my selfe?
A31514	Whether onely in Doctrinals, and such onely as are fundamentall, or come nigh the foundation?
A31514	Whether that in the 39 Articles?
A31514	Whether to Discipline also?
A31514	Whither am I hereby bound to embroile my selfe in every private quarrell betwixt particular persons?
A31514	Why are we not directed to those lawes where we may be clearely informed, what are those undoubted priviledges and rights?
A31514	Why is it not specified, that we may know to what we sweare?
A31514	Why is not there a reservation of liberty to change with the State?
A31514	],[ London?
A31514	and all innocent Ceremonies( though ancienter far then Popery) if abused by them?
A31514	or doe they vary in diverse Countries, according to the different constitutions of Statutes and charters depending on positive lawes?
A31514	or some deputed by his Majesty and the Parliament?
A31514	or the stronger part?
A31514	or to remoter superstructions undetermined?
A31514	what if a dispute arise when no Parliament sits?
A27405	13. of force yea or nay?
A27405	And are not they inexcusable before God and Man, who have condemned others for so doing, and now do the same things?
A27405	And are these Ministers of the law who gives the law the ly, who say it shall be lawful when the law saith it shal not be lawful?
A27405	And if not, is not their crime as great as their predecessors, who suffered for such things?
A27405	And if this be not a dishonor to truth and the Gospel, what is?
A27405	And is that equal which is not iusts, ors equitys which is not lawfull?
A27405	And was ever such fruit brought fo ● th in any age?
A27405	And whether are the Justices the Masters of the law or the Ministers of the law?
A27405	And whether had not the late Kings and Parliaments power to make lawes, and to declare what was law yea or nay?
A27405	And whether is the Law of England a Rule in it self both for Magistrates and people to walke by, yea or nay?
A27405	And whether there is or ought to be any trebble dammage adjudged, where and when no tythes are due?
A27405	Are not such unreasonable men?
A27405	Are not these they that makes the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ chargeable?
A27405	From whence is that Law, and for what end was it given, that is not equall?
A27405	Have they not out stript all the burdens, all the grievous burdens of the Pharisees which they themselves will not touch with one of their fingers?
A27405	If nay, then why are the people punished as transgressors of that law which is repealed?
A27405	If nay, why was it inserted?
A27405	Now if these things doe not shame all Christian Magistrates and Rulers, what will, that have not a feeling in them with these sufferers?
A27405	WAs there ever such merchandize made of any people since the world began as these fals teachers have done in our age before mentioned?
A27405	Was ever the like heard in all ages since the world began?
A27405	Was it so yea or nay?
A27405	Whether is the Proviso in a statute, a part of the statute, yea or nay?
A27405	Whether the Law of England be the higher Power, or the Judges and Lawyers opinions, which may be gained for money?
A27405	Whether the Statutes of England be a part of the Law of England?
A27405	Whether there is any transgression where there is no law?
A66244	And after what Manner?
A66244	And for what Reason it was not fitting That Men should have been Allow''d to Go any Farther?
A66244	And for what Reason it was not sitting that Men should have been Allow''d to Go any farther?
A66244	And how many Ways he may be liable so to do?
A66244	And how many ways he may be Capable of so doing?
A66244	And then, 2dly, Wherein the peculiar Malignity of this Sin does Consist?
A66244	And what can he who has done this pretend to, or even hope for, at God''s hands?
A66244	BUT what then shall we say to this Passage of St. Matthew?
A66244	But in what Cases?
A66244	Can any thing be more Express?
A66244	FOR 1st: As to what concerns the Majesty of God; What can strike more directly at that, than this Sin of Perjury?
A66244	FROM what has been said, it may appear, What it is for a Man to Forswear himself?
A66244	For if we may innocently declare what we know Once, what harm can there be in doing it a second time?
A66244	How Men are brought so easily to Forswear themselves?
A66244	How ordinary a Practice is this among us?
A66244	I proceed,( 2dly) To offer some Reflections to shew, Wherein the Peculiar Malignity of this Sin does consist?
A66244	Nor can it be supposed, that the Paraphrast design''d by his latter Expression to explain his former( for if so, what need had he to make use of it?)
A66244	Or could our Saviour have spoken more plainly, had he design''d to have done, what some pretend he has done?
A66244	Or what is there to be Assign''d in it, Unworthy of that Religion, which He Came to Establish in the World?
A66244	What an Affront it puts upon the Majesty of God?
A66244	What can the best Laws do, if they are never put in Execution?
A66244	What if he be one who Believes not in any God at all; but Laughs at all our Talk either of a Providence here, or of a Judgment hereafter?
A66244	What things are required, in All Kinds of Oaths, to prevent our being Perjured, in taking of Them?
A66244	Whence it is that they are so ready to do it, on Every little Occasion?
A66244	Wherein is consider''d, What Perjury is; and How many Ways it may be Committed?
A66244	Wherein is consider''d, What Perjury is; and How many ways it may be Committed?
A66244	Who has already given Verdict against himself; and with his own Mouth pronounced, or rather chosen, his own Doom?
A61779	15 Whether the party swearing not intending to swear be obliged?
A61779	3 Whether an oath may be dispensed withall?
A61779	5, 6 — or mentall Reservation?
A61779	But in this, now, Will you give me an hundred?
A61779	But that certainty which we seek in an oath, is los ● in equivocation; for what certainty can there be in his answer, whose meaning is uncertainty?
A61779	But what certainty can be had in words of an uncertain sense?
A61779	But what could be more clearly said in this matter, then that which Moses saies in the text?
A61779	But what of the obligation?
A61779	But why do I trouble my self with these things?
A61779	Doe you demand by what means?
A61779	For a past matter may be doubted whether it were so, or not so: as, did you see Caius yesterday in the market- place or no?
A61779	How shall I know that you will give me that hundred which you promised?
A61779	How( saith he) shall I pardon thee for this?
A61779	I ask theref ● re whether in such certain danger of ● ● e, was it lawfull for him to swear, or not lawfull?
A61779	I will tell you: Is any amongst you afflicted?
A61779	In one of which to the question, Who shall ascend into the Hill of the Lord?
A61779	In the other two a like question, Who shall abide in thy holy tabernacle?
A61779	Is any merry?
A61779	NEvertheless concerning this Hypothesis, I must advertise, that this question, Whether this or that oath be lawfull?
A61779	Nay, would he not be obliged notwithstanding that plea?
A61779	Of a thing sworn, the matter being stated, whether the conscience be, and how far it is obliged by the oath?
A61779	Of a thing to be sworn, the question is, whether it be lawfull to swear after this or that manner?
A61779	THe fourth case, whether man willing to swear, yet intending not to oblige himself, be neverthelesse obliged?
A61779	THe third Case is, whether a man doubtfull whether he have sworn, or no, be bound by by his oath?
A61779	The ends of this examen are two, the one before the oath, that a man may bethink himself, whether it be fit to use such a form, or no?
A61779	The first concerneth the person swearing, Whether, and how far the oath obligeth his Heirs, and Successors?
A61779	The first ease is, whether he who sweareth by the creature be, and how far he is obliged?
A61779	The inconveniencies which are objected from this silence, might they not( seeing dead men are enjoyned perpetuall silence) be objected from his death?
A61779	WHerefore the first doubt is, How far the oath of a person not indued with the faculty of judgement, obligeth?
A61779	Were it not ridiculous, if he who hath signed, and sealed a bond, shal plead that he had no intention thereby to oblige himself?
A61779	Where will you finde a knot to tye this Vertumnus unto one shape?
A61779	You told me you would give me an hundred; will you give me them?
A61779	differs very much from that, Whether this or that oath oblige?
A61779	or a future one, whether it will be so or not: as, will you lend me an hundred pound to morrow, or will you not?
A61779	or a present one, whether it be so or not; as, have you the money I left in your hands, or have you it not?
A61779	what is become of Domestick Discipline amongst Christians?
A65844	And is not he himself guilty of the same?
A65844	And must not we walk in him the New and Living Way, and obey his Commands?
A65844	And were not this most grosly to charge Paul with Transgression both of Law and Gospel?
A65844	And what is this to the Imposition of Oaths we desired the Parliament to remove?
A65844	But when have we refused to pay our Civil- Duties or Taxes, being in a Capacity, that is, out of Bonds and Sufferings, which have disabled many?
A65844	But why makes this man such a Difference between the Good Fortune of Caesar, or Caesar''s Prosperity?
A65844	Could not he swallow such Camel- Oaths where he allows the use of such Forms, as Swearing by Heaven;& c. because Gods Name is implyed?
A65844	Could our Consciences serve us to Conform, Pay Tythes, Uphold Priests,& c. what needed we make Address for Liberty?
A65844	Did he therein call them to swear, in saying, If they would testifie?
A65844	Neither do we read that the Authors say, That that Charge was denyed by them; and then, what need was there of proving it before it was denyed?
A65844	No, said the Bishop, and why?
A65844	Secondly, Neither is Swearing by the Health of the Emperor any more warrantable; And did not both these Oaths savour of Heathenism?
A65844	Then said the Bishop, Why wilt thou not Swear before a Judge,& c?
A65844	This makes for us; for were not promissory Oaths as well as assertory allowed under the Law?
A65844	To Swear by Heaven or Jerusalem are Camel- Oaths: What Credit can this man''s Work against us be of?
A65844	VVill any presume to say, That he Swore by the Heap of Stones, which was a Witness or a Memorial?
A65844	We may ask this, J. S. Where are thy Eyes?
A65844	What Evil then is it to swear?
A65844	Where is your Conscience, who belye so many,& c?
A65844	],[ London?
A65844	and why are men put upon Swearing in their Account for their Tyths, more then in their private Contracts about them?
A65844	and yet would not swear but by the God of Truth: Was there no Difference between the Health of a Wicked Persecuting Emperor, and the God of Truth?
A65844	or where ever he acknowledg''d himself convinc''d that this was an Error?
A44801	( falsly reputed Christians) and yet abides not in his Doctrine?
A44801	11. for it is written( where?
A44801	63. say,( I adjure thee to tell us whether thou be Christ the Son of God?)
A44801	Art thou then the Son of God?
A44801	I adjure thee to tell us whether thou art the son of God or not?
A44801	It is not the seat of Judgment established in Righteousness and truth?
A44801	Swear not at all; doth it overthrow all Justice and Judicatories?
A44801	Who doth the greater violence to this Scripture?
A44801	and he said unto them, ye say that I am; and Pilate was as much a Magistrate as the high Priest, and he asked art thou the King of the Jewes?
A44801	and then what is become of these two great Mysteries as they have been called?
A44801	and whether was this a new Institution of Christ, or was it an Institution in the Law?
A44801	had Cain peace when he had slain his brother?
A44801	had Israel peace when she slew the Prophets?
A44801	had the Jewes peace when they had Crucified Christ?
A44801	had the Romans peace when they persecuted the first Christians?
A44801	if he have but the power of this World on his side?
A44801	nothing at all; and what doth this prove which A. S. inserts in his Marginal notes?
A44801	or what would not he oppose?
A44801	shall not this circumcision become uncircumcision?
A44801	shall not this inherit the promise?
A44801	the 27. he tells us that the essence of swearing is in calling God to witness, and how or where did Christ call God to witness?
A44801	then the Scribes and Pharisees to theirs?
A59242	And what Catholick alive will presume to say this?
A59242	And what needs Princes desire any greater security( say they) what need they trouble themselves with their Subjects speculative opinions?
A59242	And why not good for the Catholick cause?
A59242	But alas how groundless is such a fear?
A59242	But do not Protestants fear him too?
A59242	For by granting only so much, it will necessarily follow?
A59242	For( saies he) what needs any oath at all to detect who are Roman Catholicks?
A59242	Hereto his adversary is brought in replying And what for Excommunications and absolutions, be they in the princes power also?
A59242	How comes it then to pass that they can in England swear that the King is supreme Head and Governour in all causes Ecclesiastical or spirituall?
A59242	Is it because the Oath of Supremacy has so peculiar a conformity to their principles, and that of Allegiance to their practises?
A59242	Now what Christian at this day alive will make these two Recognitions in the sence aforesaid?
A59242	Now who will believe such an Oath as this?
A59242	Or rather will they not be esteemed for such an oaths sake, resolved to be disloyal both to God and man?
A59242	This is known at Rome and all Christendom over; and yet who dare impute Heresy to them?
A59242	Though how can Equivocation be excluded, when according to them one Equivocation may be renounced by another?
A59242	What apprehension have the Kings of France, Spain, or the State of Venice from such promises?
A59242	What then can be imagined more necessary for a cure to so great a confusion, then to change such inefficacious instruments of Loyalty?
A59242	Who can reconcile these things together in such a sence?
A59242	Why?
A59242	Will he require some to be obedient to Bishops as instituted by Christ, and others to renounce them as Antichristian?
A59242	Yea what English Protestant will be willing to make even the Negative Recognition?
A59242	or that they are so ready, and pressing to disclaim and condemn all that themselves have done these last twenty years?
A29790	A Son of Slaughter at White- Chappel converted to the observation of Fish- days; or an old inveterate Republican turn''d a stiff Assertor of Monarchy?
A29790	A right Country Gentleman''s Question I''faith, for the first thing he generally asks you is, What is the News?
A29790	And does a Coach and six Horses baffle Heroes, spoil Divines, and make Milksops of Princes?
A29790	And is all your mighty News, which you prefaced with so much show and Ceremonie, come to this sorry issue at last?
A29790	And what does Interest, meer Interest only do all this?
A29790	Any Court- 〈 … 〉 ● ● nen, and no back- biting; any litigious Attorney to 〈 ◊ 〉 And Arbitrations?
A29790	Any of the Town Criticks to Modesty?
A29790	Any thrice married Widow to impotence?
A29790	As the Country Ladies when they come up to Town, enquire in the first place, Which is the newest Play or Lampoon?
A29790	But are they all so inveterate?
A29790	But may a Man be so happy as to hear you produce any Reasons for what you have said?
A29790	But prithee wou''d not you have a man be careful to preserve his Character and Reputation in the World, and study to give as little scandal as may be?
A29790	Come tell me now, have I hitupon the true reason or no?
A29790	Come then, wert thou ever married, my honest friend?
A29790	Conscience do you say?
A29790	Crys the Master of the Porcupine, You Rascal, what do you intend by asking me what Sawce I''de have for him?
A29790	Dear Sir, your Humble Servant; how have you done this many a fair day, and how long have you been in Town?
A29790	Dost thou now comprehend my Meaning?
A29790	Got his Reasons ready do you say?
A29790	I wou''d desire to know how you make that out, Noble Sir?
A29790	Is a 〈 … 〉 ● arlon turn''d a friend to Cleanliness?
A29790	Is any noted S ● ● ● ● ian turn''d a Friend to Faith?
A29790	Is there then no difference between tolerating and establishing?
A29790	Nay the Lord knows, which is Mr. Bay''s Primitive Church; but prithee why dost thou trouble thy head about a Poet''s Religion?
A29790	Not married say you?
A29790	Of a few Conjugal Sollicitations do you say?
A29790	Or any of the Modern Comprehension- men converted to a good Opinion of the poor suffering Ceremonies of the Church?
A29790	Or any of the good people of Doctors- Commons to unlicenc ● d Marriges?
A29790	Or have any of the topping Sons of Schism by the Bribe of a good Deanry or Bishoprick been converted to the Liturgy?
A29790	Or lastly, any Alderman that was begotten on a Bulk, to Heraldry and Pedigrees?
A29790	Prithee what story is that, for, to the best of my knowledg, I never heard of it before?
A29790	Say you so Tim?
A29790	Say you so sir?
A29790	Sons of Schism?
A29790	The Question is, whether what the Dr. has formerly preached or written, is the true Doctrin of the Church of England or no?
A29790	They preserve the Protestant Religion?
A29790	To conclude then: Is the Vicar near Charing- Cross convinced there''s not so much Bawdry in the Service of Matrimony as without it?
A29790	To proceed then, is the Dr. brought to a better Opinion of the Abdication, or does he go altogether upon the merits of Forefaulture?
A29790	VVHo''s that, my old Friend Mr. Freeman, e Comitatu Bucks?
A29790	Well then, Granting all you have said to be true, what advantage do you intend to make of it?
A29790	Well, and what of all this?
A29790	What think you of this now?
A29790	What, not one single man amongst the whole Herd, that congratulates the Government for the great Happiness of his Reduction?
A29790	When the Fellow was got into his Room at the Inn, he knocks for the Landlord, and asks him whether he had got his Porcupine ready?
A29790	Where, or how?
A29790	Which is the Topping Mistress of the Court, or the most fashionable Suit of Ribbons at the Exchange?
A29790	Who could ever expect that?
A29790	Why, prithee Tim, what dost thou take me for, a Prophet, or a Conjurer?
A29790	Why, what a Devil did he mean by that question?
A29790	or in what Reign, that we may see it registred in our Almanacks?
A29790	what a deal of insignificant flourish and preparation is here to usher in, it may be, but a foolish story at last?
A39572	( which with the other amount ▪ to 2000 years in all) were spent and gone even of the new?
A39572	9. all one?
A39572	And is not that Law spiritual,( though universal?)
A39572	Are they to fashion themselves therefore according to the Nations, as H. D. would have them?
A39572	But I say, let him have it this way, Swear not commonly, ordinarily, frequently; What follows?
A39572	But what''s this to the few Saints?
A39572	But( quoth H. D. as objecting on behalf of his Opponents) how then doth the Text say, Above all things swear not?
A39572	Can that be accounted an evil( if not easily undertaken) whereof we have the Lord for a President?
A39572	Does God, or did he ever require any man, on pain of exclusion from his holy Hill, to swear to his own hurt?
A39572	Doth not the consent of Scripture herein confute the swearing Baptist, while it sayes, Swear not at all, and that the customs of the Nations are vain?
A39572	Doth the Baptist say the consent of Nations confutes the Quaker in the point of Swearing, which the Light within him biddeth him to do?
A39572	Finally, To H. D''s Question, What thing God did, which can be evil in us if we do it?
A39572	How can that be accounted evil which is approved by all Nations?
A39572	How say some that there is no resurrection of the dead?
A39572	How unlike the Christians in former times are you?
A39572	If so, that it relates to the New- Testament, as it s understood by many to do?
A39572	Is he ignorant that the world lies in wickedness, 1 Joh: 5. excepting those few who know they are of God?
A39572	Is not the Law that''s in Heathens hearts, whereby they are accused or excused, the Law of God, whose Law is Light?
A39572	No, said the Bishop; and why?
A39572	Now how great is this Authority, namely, the consent of all Nations?
A39572	Rep. Dost thou know we will not say it?
A39572	Rep. We do not say it is; but if it be not, are there not more wayes out of the wood, as well as into it, then one?
A39572	Risum teneatis?
A39572	That its worse to swear then to commit Adultery, to kill the King, to kill Father or Mother, and then to appeal to all men whether it be true or no?
A39572	Was their consent to be taken for divine evidence, or the dissent rather of those Three?
A39572	What Nation so barbarom, but it commits Idolatry, and approves it as good?
A39572	What Nation so barbarous, but it will alter, or for fear fore- go the Worsh ● … p of their God, and their Religion, if their Rulers require it?
A39572	What gets H. D. then by this?
A39572	What''s that to us?
A39572	When shall that be?
A39572	Who sayes its worse to swear then to commit adultery, to kill the King, to kill Father or Mother?
A39572	Who shall heal these distempers?
A39572	Why then dost thou so vainly ask whether this be a true Interpretation, which thou knowest not that any body makes?
A39572	Will any think this is that water onely that puts away the outward filth of the outward flesh?
A39572	[ 2], 78 p. Printed for Robert Wilson..., London:[ 1660?]
A39572	and v. 32. why do I fight with Beasts, or beastial spirited men?
A39572	and what shall become of Pride, when all sin, which it''s not the least of, is done away?
A39572	eng Denne, Henry, 1606 or 7- 1660?
A39572	inform us that these general terms must be restrained?
A39572	that they shall swear to their own hurt?
A39572	where is your first love?
A39572	yet will H. D. here call it natural, Natures finger?
A54581	A: What do you here intend to refer to?
A54581	According to those words in Malachi, If then I be a Father, where is my honour?
A54581	And then having brought in his Popish opponents objection, Hem quid audio?
A54581	And what is the Reason which the Iudges give of this Resolution?
A54581	And will your Lordships allow this ecclesiastical Head no ecclesiastical Senses?
A54581	But I should be glad to know whether it made any fermentation in the Body of the People Representative, and what was the Result of it?
A54581	But doth that Explanation of the Regal Power assert any thing in Defence of the Dispensative part of it?
A54581	But were not their Consciences extremely erroneous who thought themselves bound then to advance Religion by War?
A54581	But will you then tell me of Disability being thus tacitly dispens''d with, and with a salvo to Conscience as to the obligation of humane Laws?
A54581	But( I beseech you) did not the Protestant Divines of the Church of Scotland then cry out of the unlawfulness or inexpedience of that Dispensation?
A54581	But( by the way) do you think then that Sovereign Princes offend the Law of God in Pardoning Murther?
A54581	Can you guess whence it is that men have imbibed this mistaken fancy?
A54581	Can you readily now at this time give any instance of the House of Commons th ● … n doing any thing of that Nature?
A54581	Did Sir William Iones maintain the King''s Power of Dispensing with Acts of Parliament?
A54581	Did the Parliament acquiesce in what the King had done as aforesaid?
A54581	Did they offend any other Uncontroverted Rights of the Crown?
A54581	Do you account it to have any great spreading Influence on mens Consciences here in keeping them both innocent and quiet?
A54581	Have you this Matter of Fact out of any of the Records in England or Scotland?
A54581	It seem''d very necessary in the judgment of our Governors then?
A54581	No Ecclesiastical Persons to be censulted with at all?
A54581	No not in any Circumstances of time and place?
A54581	No?
A54581	Or did the late Kings Loyal long Parliament do so in their obtaining the Act for the Habeas Corpus, and others that might be named?
A54581	W ● … at account doth Mr. Prynne give of that?
A54581	Was that Speech of the Archbishop ever printed?
A54581	Was that all the favour he shew''d Roman- Catholicks?
A54581	What a Concatenation of Perjuries was our Land so long enslaved with?
A54581	What?
A54581	Whether a mere Lay- man no Doctor of the Civil Law, may be a Bishop''s Register, contrary to an Act of Parliament?
A54581	Whether a mere Lay- man, no Doctor of the Civil Law, may be a Bishop''s Chancellor, and so may Excommunicate?
A54581	Whom do you mean by those?
A54581	what had become of that great work of our Reformation in this flourishing Church of England?
A69826	Do you use to swear such as make no Conscience?
A69826	Guilty, or not guilty?
A69826	Have not they that liberty which others are debarr''d of?
A69826	How came I here, if you know not?
A69826	How can I help my self when you have out- lawed me?
A69826	I am upon the point; Will not my pleading deprive me of the benefit of the Law?
A69826	I desire to be heard; Where is mine Accuser?
A69826	I have been about six weeks in Prison, and am I now called to accuse my self?
A69826	If any have wronged you, take your course in Law; will you swear?
A69826	If it be not drawn to execute Judgment, will not the God of Justice draw his Sword of displeasure?
A69826	If this be true, then for shame swear men no more: if words be sufficient to bind, what need Oaths?
A69826	If you plead not, the Indictment will be found against you: Will you answer?
A69826	Is this the Iudgment of the whole Court?
A69826	Is this the Judgment of the Court?
A69826	It is no matter of Conscience, Guilty or not Guilty?
A69826	J. C. By what Law have you power to tender it?
A69826	J. C. Is this Canting, to speak the words of the Scripture?
A69826	Mr. Crook, If you will answer you may plead for your self, or will you take the Oath?
A69826	Mr. Crook, you must not be your own Iudge, we are your Iudges; but for our parts we will not wrong you: Will you answer Guilty, or not Guilty?
A69826	Mr. Grey, will you take the Oath?
A69826	My Case is not theirs, yet they have their Accusers; and may not I call for mine?
A69826	No more ado, the form is nothing, Guilty, or not?
A69826	Now what virtue is wanting in him that doth speak the truth without dissimulation, but dare not swear at all?
A69826	Shall not the Righteous God do Righteously?
A69826	Sirrah, Guilty, or not guilty?
A69826	The Court takes no notice how you came hither; What say you, will you answer?
A69826	The next day Isaac Grey was called to the Bar, and asked by the Judge, if he would yet take the Oath?
A69826	Then we cryed out, Will you not give us leave to speak for our selves?
A69826	We do ask you again, whether you will take the Oath of Allegiance?
A69826	We take no notice of your Imprisonment, nor how you came here; Will you take the Oath?
A69826	What Meeting was that you were at?
A69826	What do you talk to us of Conscience?
A69826	What though no man tendred the Oath to you when you were committed( as you say) it being now tendred to you?
A69826	When did you take the Oath of Allegiance?
A69826	Where''s the Sword of Justice that should not be born in vain, but used for the punishment of evil- doers, and for the praise of them that do well?
A69826	Will you answer, Guilty or not Guilty?
A69826	Will you answer, Guilty, or not Guilty?
A69826	Will you hear me?
A69826	Will you not stand to your own Iudgments?
A69826	Will you plead, Guilty, or not Guilty?
A69826	Will you speak to the Indictment?
A69826	Will you take the Oath of Allegiance?
A69826	Will you yet swear, or plead to the Indictment?
A69826	Would you have men swear whether they will or nay, especially when against their Conscience?
A69826	Yes, if there be new matter; or, if there fall out any emergent occasion, whereby you minister on your part new occasion: Mr. Crook, will you swear?
A69826	You are a saucy and an impudent fellow; will you tell us what is Law, or our duties?
A69826	and therefore call for them, for you ought to do so, as Christ said to the Woman,( Woman, where are thine Accusers?)
A69826	and when he utters his Voice, will not the Beasts of the Field tremble?
A69826	and, when were any of them convicted by vertue of any of these Laws, though made principally for them?
A69826	are they haled out of their Meetings by armed men without Warrant or Order, as the People called Quakers, and others, are?
A69826	are you Guilty, or not Guilty?
A69826	for, if you will not be just to your selves and your own Iudgments, how can I expect you should be just to me?
A69826	so you ought to say to me,( Man, where are thine Accusers?)
A54142	And can we reasonably think the Romanists will be wanting in that, when they see it is their own( and perhaps their only) Interest to do so?
A54142	And if it be so, what can it do?
A54142	And if they say, O but they were in Error that punish''d their Non- conformity; I answer, how can she prove that she is Infallibly in the Right?
A54142	And is not this a Rare Motive for a Christian Church to continue Penal Laws for Religion?
A54142	And what are they?
A54142	Are there Tares in Opinion?
A54142	Are we afraid of their Power and yet provoke it?
A54142	But may I without Offence ask her, when she kept Persecution out?
A54142	But what need we go so far back?
A54142	But, Is it not an odd thing, that by leaving them on foot, every Body shall have Liberty of Conscience but the Goverment?
A54142	Could they Conscientiously oppose his Exclusion for his Religion, and now his Religion because he will not leave it?
A54142	Did Christ then come to save Mens Lives, and not to destroy them?
A54142	Does he seek to impose his own Religion upon her?
A54142	He condemned that Spirit in his Disciples, and shall we uphold the same Spirit, and that by Law too, which he condemned by his Gospel?
A54142	How can she be sincerely willing that should be done, that she is not willing should be done legally?
A54142	How could she hope for this King without his Conscience?
A54142	How?
A54142	I apply it thus: Is it not her Interest to be careful she does it not a second time?
A54142	I believe there may be some poor silly Biggots that hope bigger, and talk further, but who can help that?
A54142	I have been often scandal''d at that Expression from the Sons of the Church of England, especially those of the Robe, What do you talk for?
A54142	Is it their Property to do so?
A54142	Is it unjust in Popery to invade her Priviledges, and can it be just in her to provoke it, by denying a Christian Liberty?
A54142	Is not this doing Evil that Good may come of it, and that uncertain too, against an express Command as well as common Charity?
A54142	Is this against Protestancy?
A54142	Is this an Immitation of their practice, to uphold the Weapons of their Destruction?
A54142	Let the Tears and Wheat grow together till the Harvest; what''s that?
A54142	Let us not then usurp their Office Besides, we are to Love Enemies; this is the great Law of our Religion; by what Law then are we to Persecute them?
A54142	O what Corruption is this that has prevail''d over Men of such Pretensions to Light and Conscience?
A54142	Or if she keeps out Popery for any bodies sake but her own?
A54142	Or to exclude those from her Society who may be admitted into Heaven?
A54142	Shall the Church of England, that glories in a great Light, be more concern''d for her Power, than her Credit?
A54142	She pretends to fear the Strokes of the Romanists, but I would fain know of her, if following their Example will convert them, or secure her?
A54142	Should they not be pluckt up before?
A54142	Suppose this, is there not as Potent Naval Powers to assist the Constitution of the Kingdom from such Invasions?
A54142	Suppose your Apprehensions well grounded, you can but be Destroy''d; Which is most comfortable for you to suffer by Law or without it?
A54142	They shall think, says he to his Disciples, they do God good service to kill you; who should think so?
A54142	To be, than to be that which she should be?
A54142	Was not Religion sufficiently guarded and fenced in ● hem?
A54142	Was there ever more true and cordial Reverence in the Worship of God?
A54142	Well, but if we must not knock Folks on the Head, what must we do with them?
A54142	What Charter hath Christ given the Church to bind men up to more than himself hath done?
A54142	What ground can there be why Christians should not stand upon the same terms now which they did in the time of Christ and his Apostles?
A54142	What then has befallen her, that she changes the course she took with such resolutions of perseverance?
A54142	What then is the matter?
A54142	What then is the use of Penal Laws?
A54142	What weight is it to a Church, that she is the Church by Law established, when no humane Law can make a true Church?
A54142	Where is Faith in God?
A54142	Who art Thou( saith he) who dost judge another?
A54142	Will she Dissent from both now?
A54142	and should she( she I say, that pretends to be a reformed Church) uphold those Laws that do destroy them?
A54142	as if he should have said, dost thou know thy self, what thou art, and what thou dost?
A54142	is it not recent in memory, that Bishop Vsher was Employ''d to O. Cromwell by some of the Clergy of the Church of England for Liberty of Conscience?
A54142	or can she expect what she will not give?
A54142	or conceive that his Honour or Conscience would let him leave the Members of his Communion under the lash of so many Destroying Laws?
A54142	or not do as she would be done by, because she fears others will not observe the same Rule to her?
A54142	where is trust in Providence?
A54142	with Penal Laws?
A54142	would she be so serv''d by a Prince of her own Religion, and she in the like Circumstances?
A02913	& all the people must say so be it: was God thus jealous of Moses ordinances, ād is the lesse jelous of Christs?
A02913	?
A02913	A. Doth not Christ in the parrable Teach that he compelled all to come in?
A02913	A. Doth not the Prophet say: that Kings shal be nursing Fathers& Queenes nursing Mothers to the Church?
A02913	A. Hath not all the Learned of the Land considered of these things,& set thē dovvne, are such simple men as you likely to see more then all these?
A02913	A. Hath not the King the same ● ovver that the Kings of Israel had who cōpelled mē to the observation of the lavv of God?
A02913	And can any serve Christ and the Beast, God and the Dragon?
A02913	And vvhy may not wee followe his example?
A02913	Are all without exception in this feareful estate to bee cast into the laike that burneth with fire and brimstone?
A02913	But Moses sayd vnto them, Shall your brethren goe to warre and ye tarie here?
A02913	But are men left then to their owne free will?
A02913	But do they teach their hearers to hate vaine inventions and love Gods Law?
A02913	But if this be granted/ this question ariseth who shal then baptize after Antichrists exaltation?
A02913	But one thinge I demaunde of you, who now is King of Israel?
A02913	But what doe you then hold of infants?
A02913	C. I demaund of you wherewith doth he compel them?
A02913	C. Then, I demaund this question, whether every Christiā without respect of persons ought not to bee subject to Christs Lawes for his salvation?
A02913	C. Wel, then I demand, hath the fleshly childr 〈 … 〉 of the faithfull, more previlege to life and salvation then the faithful themselves?
A02913	C. What authoritie can any mortall Man require more, then of bodie, goods, life, and all that apperteyneth to the outward Man?
A02913	C. What doe you meane by free will?
A02913	C. What thē: is it therefore Chr: baptisme?
A02913	C. Wherefore should they be condemned?
A02913	C. You say true: then for that sin, God never purposed to condemne Adam to hell: if not him for that, why any of his posteritie for that?
A02913	C. what then/ Is not his practice written for our instruction?
A02913	Cā a theife that hath stolne goods, repent thereof to acceptance with God, and not make restitutiō to the party wronged?
A02913	Christ or Antichrist?
A02913	Did God ever purpose or declare, that Adam for that transgression should goe to hell?
A02913	Do not the Bbs: herein justifie this accursed doctrine and practice in the Papists?
A02913	Further did not that Southsayer Balaam, teach excellent truths?
A02913	Helwys, Thomas, 1550?-1616?, attributed name.
A02913	How comes it then that some do beleeve/ and some do not?
A02913	How long Lord?
A02913	I demaund of you, did any of Adams posteritie fall deeper in that trāsgression then he himself?
A02913	I demaund/ doth the Lord require no more worke of them?
A02913	I. I can not contradict you in this, I will better cōsider of it, but I pray you what hold you then of Predestination?
A02913	I. I confesse these iudgments are to be trembled at/ but how do you apply them properly to such as worship in these assemblies?
A02913	I. I praise God you have given me great satisfaction in these things/ what must we do after our baptisme?
A02913	If men hold errors& vvill not obey the truth, do they not sin against God,& deserve punishment?
A02913	If vvicked malefactors should bee let allone to the end of the vvorld, then vvhere is the Magistrats svvorde?
A02913	Is Gods Church thus planted?
A02913	Is this all the authority that you vvill give to the King?
A02913	May none be admitted to the Church/ to pertake in the ordinances, except they be baptized?
A02913	May we say/ the Religion of the Philo ● ● phers was good because of their morall ver ● es?
A02913	Next/ after forsaking the wayes of wickednes/ and imbraceing Christ for our righteousnes what must wee do?
A02913	Shall they not escape damnatiō for this accursed doctrine and practice, ād thinke you you shall?
A02913	So may I say, whether is greater the water and washinge, or the word that sanctifies the water?
A02913	Thou that teachest another, teachest thou not they selff?
A02913	VVhy come you not to Church?
A02913	Vnto the wicked said God, what haist thou to do with my ordināces?
A02913	Were not blasphemers put to death in time of he lavv?
A02913	What do you meane by wil not heare?
A02913	What iff I should many times go through weaknes?
A02913	What other example have you in the scriptures, that on vnbaptized person may baptise?
A02913	What should I do there?
A02913	],[ The Netherlands?
A02913	and as the lord saith: Iff I be your maister, where is my feare?
A02913	and was not reformation wrought hereby?
A02913	ād did not they that preached in Christs name cast out Devils, and do many and great workes?
A02913	doth he not requyre that they should help to cast downe Babell?
A02913	must he die that dispiseth Moses law, and shal he escape that dispiseth Christs?
A02913	or do Christs Disciples thus plant?
A02913	or if he could not have resisted God in eating the forbidden fruit/ how could God have manifested his mercie to him in Christ?
A02913	the offering, or the altar that sanctifieth the offering?
A02913	thou that judgest another, judgest them not thy self?
A02913	was Israels sin halfe so great as Iudahs?
A02913	who are more confidēt of their good estate with God then the Papists, notwithstanding al their grosse abhominations?
A02913	who hath set vp his new way?
A02913	wil not Christ Iesus pronounce absolutely either salvation or condemnation to every one?
A02913	● nd whither did our Saviour flie/ when the ● ime came that he was to shewe himselfe to Israell?
A04286	4 What other thing feared Frederick Barbarossa but Excommuniticaon?
A04286	And aboue alll, how frankly and freely did I free Recusants of their ordinary payments?
A04286	And as for suppressing of the Scriptures how many hundreth yeeres were the people kept in such blindnesse, as these witnesses were almost vnknowne?
A04286	And how could all the Apostles haue otherwise vsed all their censures, only in Christs Name, and neuer a word of his Vicar?
A04286	And last of all, by what inspiration could he foretell whereupon hee was to bee accused?
A04286	And since Ipse dixit; nay, ter dixit, per quem facta sunt omnia, what mortall man dare interprete him otherwise; nay, directly contrary?
A04286	And what blasphemous corrupting of Scripture is it, to turne Dominus into Domina throughout the whole Psalmes?
A04286	And what is this to say?
A04286	But first we must know what kinde of touching of Christs body drew a vertue from it; whether euery touching, or only touching by faith?
A04286	But what cause gaue I him to farce his whole booke with iniuries, both against my person and booke?
A04286	But who can wonder at this contradiction of himselfe in this point, when his owne great Volumes are so filled with contradictions?
A04286	But whose hatred did he feare in this?
A04286	But why should I presume any more to interprete Malachy, since it is sufficient that CHRIST himselfe hath interpreted him so?
A04286	Did hee not accept of the conditions to poyson the man, and had his pay?
A04286	Doeth he that taketh it, promise there to beleeue, or not to beleeue any article of Religion?
A04286	For as for the Catholique faith; can there bee one word found in all that Oath, tending or sounding to matter of Religion?
A04286	For if he thinke himselfe my lawfull Iudge, wherefore hath he condemned me vnheard?
A04286	For what exampl ● is there in all the Scripture, in which disobedi ● nce to the Oath of the King, or want of allegiance is allowed?
A04286	Had not wee then, and our Parliament great reason, by this Oath to set a marke of distinction betweene good Subiects and bad?
A04286	Haue I euer importuned the Pope with any request for my securitie?
A04286	How free& continual accesse, had all rankes& degrees of Papists in my Court& company?
A04286	How indifferently did I giue audience, and accesse to both sides, bestowing equally all fauours and honors on both professions?
A04286	How many Emperors did the Pope raise warre against in their owne bowels?
A04286	How many did I honour with knighthood, of knowen& open Recusants?
A04286	I that in the yeere of GOD 84 erected Bishops, and depressed all their popular Paritie, I then being not 18. yeeres of age?
A04286	If the Breues[ of Clement] did not exclude mee from the Kingdome, but rather did include me, why did Garnet burne them?
A04286	Is not this to confound CHRISTS person with hers?
A04286	Or doeth he so much as name a true or a false Church there?
A04286	Or haue I either troubled other Christian Princes my friends& allies, to intreat for me at the Popes hand?
A04286	Or yet haue I begged from them any aide or assistance for my farther securitie?
A04286	Was neuer Chistian Emperour or King afraid of the Popes?
A04286	Was not the a Emperour afraid, who b waited bare- footed in the frost and snow three dayes at the Popes gate, before hee could get entrie?
A04286	Was not the c Emperour also afraide, d who was driuen to lie agroofe on his belly, and suffer another Pope to tread vpon his necke?
A04286	What certaine information had he then receiued vpon the particulars, whereupon hee was to be accused?
A04286	What could hee know, that the said Arch- priest was not taken vpon suspicion of his guiltinesse in the Powder- Treason?
A04286	What did k Alexander the third write to the Soldan?
A04286	What need such wilde racked Commentaries for such three wordes?
A04286	Who haue interest, but KINGS, in the withdrawing of true Subiection from Kings?
A04286	f Augustine speaking of Iulian, saith, Iulian was an vnbeleeuing Emperour: was he not an Apostata, an Oppressour, and an Idolater?
A04286	f Quis me constituit Iudicem super vos?
A04286	was it not yours?
A04286	why would he not reserue them that I might haue seene them, that so he might haue obtained more fauour at mine hands, for him and his Catholickes?
A09102	And are not other Catholicks deliuered from the guylt therof, by the long, and diligent search of Iustice made thereabout?
A09102	And are not these goodly definitions( thinke you) for so great and graue a man to produce?
A09102	And can any thing be spoken more cleerly for vs, and for our cause, then this?
A09102	And did not they cyte many places of Scriptures, to proue the equity& necessity therof?
A09102	And do not all Protestants the like at this day, in all places, where they are, both in Polonia, Austria, Hungaria, Bohemia, Styria, and els where?
A09102	And do these words last adioyned make any thing at all for our Apologer?
A09102	And how can these things be defended with any shew or probability of truth?
A09102	And how then are these, and such other places brought in for witnesse, as though they had somwhat to say against vs?
A09102	And how then can this Apologer talke so much of equality vsed in all fauours?
A09102	And how then is Cardinall Bellarmyne said heere to be no lesse contrary to God, concerning Kings Authority, then light to darknes, and heauen to hell?
A09102	And how then, is all this ascribed to the Pope, which proceeded from the Some against his Father?
A09102	And how thē is Iordanis conuersus retrorsum, with this Minister?
A09102	And how thē shall we cleare this importāt matter, VVhether there be any pointes in this Oath belonging to religion, besydes Cyuill Obedience?
A09102	And is this good dealing?
A09102	And is this so absurd doctrine?
A09102	And may a man thinke this to be true or likely, that so rude a proposition should come from Bellarmine?
A09102	And was not this a great in felicity?
A09102	And were it not a great synne to increase the same, by casting in oyle to augmēt the flame?
A09102	And what an abuse of his Maiesties mercie and clemencie, to expect libertie of Conscience?
A09102	And what will the Apologer say heere?
A09102	And wherin thē?
A09102	And why then are men kept in prison, after they haue taken this Oath?
A09102	And why then is this so vniustly layed vpon the Pope?
A09102	And why was all this, but for their Religion?
A09102	And will not the Catholicks of England vse this speach also vnto their King?
A09102	Are they not all gates of Hell?
A09102	Are they not executed, that were culpable therof?
A09102	Augustine speaking of Iulian, saith thus: Iulian was an vnbelieuing Emperour, was he not an Apostata?
A09102	But I would aske him wherin?
A09102	But alas, is there no end of exprobration against the Innocent for the Nocent?
A09102	But if a man would aske him, how he can proue, that those things were so directly inioyned, and plainly authorized, what answere will he make?
A09102	But what is this vnto our Oath?
A09102	But what man is so simple, or sil ● y, that will not presently demaund, how we shall know the certaynty, when Antichrist is to come?
A09102	But what?
A09102	Did S. Ambrose by this acknowledge that the Emperour had higher Authority, then he, in Church- matters?
A09102	Doth this man care what he saith?
A09102	First this: As for the Catholicke Religion( saith he) can there be one word found in all this Oath, tending to matter of Religion?
A09102	For approbation of matters cōcerning faith?
A09102	For how shall the Reader try the truth of this obiection?
A09102	For that this, perhaps, is called the Oath of Allegiance?
A09102	For what more dishonorable infelicity can there be, then that which standeth in Capito Libri of Q. Elizabeths lyfe?
A09102	Had it not bene more plaine dealing to haue alleadged some one sentence, or conclusion contradictory to the other?
A09102	How can he say, that there was no persecution before the powder- treason?
A09102	How can the Apologer defend himself in this place, from willfull exaggeration, and voluntary mistaking?
A09102	How is his voyce contrary to the voyce& sense of all the rest?
A09102	How is this against him?
A09102	How thē doth the Apologer so grosly forget, and contradict himself, euen then, when he goeth about to proue contradictions in his Aduersary?
A09102	If it be vnlawfull, why hath he not expressed any one cause or reason therof?
A09102	Is not Recusancie a cause of Conscience?
A09102	Is not this good dealing?
A09102	Is nothing promised in those wordes to be belieued, or not to be belieued?
A09102	Is this a token of want of better matter, or no?
A09102	Is this good dealing?
A09102	May he, in truth, be said to ● rouch, that an Emperor must be cōtēt to drinke after a Bishops Chaplin?
A09102	No commiseration?
A09102	No compassion?
A09102	Nunquid non omnes portae Inferi?
A09102	Or doth this iustify the Apologers outragious proposition, That Bellarmyne affirmeth Kings to be rather slaues then Lordes?
A09102	Or how doth this shew any such ordinary tricke of falshood in the Cardinal, not in one or two, but in all his citations?
A09102	Or may not we deliuer our Iudges of England, from the cryme of murther, though many mens deathes haue proceeded from them, by way of Iustice?
A09102	Or rather agree they not fitly to the purpose of the Cardinals exhortation, though for breuityes sake he left them out?
A09102	Or why is this submission made?
A09102	Shall he be bound to read all Bellarmynes fiue bookes, to see whether it be true or no?
A09102	The Sonne of such a Mother, as held her selfe much beholden to English Catholicks?
A09102	The second thus: Doth he that taketh it, promise to belieue, or not to belieue any article of Religion?
A09102	To take any Oath that the Emperour Charles should propose vnto them?
A09102	Were they not all for lyberty of Conscience?
A09102	What Author can he bring for it, that auoucheth the same?
A09102	What enemy of Christian Religion might not cauill, and calumniate this?
A09102	What fault hath Cardinall Bellarmine heere in alledging the words, and iudgement of S. Chrysostome?
A09102	What i ● he neuer knew of any such attempt?
A09102	What is height of pryde and so ● l ●, i ● this be not?
A09102	What was Nero?
A09102	What would he haue done, or said, if he had bene pressed with an Oath against his Conscience, or any least poynt of his Religion?
A09102	Wherin then, or why are they said to haue submitted themselues?
A09102	Wherin then, or why is this submission, or rather remission to the Emperour, and his iudgmēt?
A09102	Who knoweth not, that the fayrest tytle is put vpon the fowlest matter, when it is to be persuaded or exacted?
A09102	Who seeth not the iniustice of this manner of dealing?
A09102	Who seeth not this violēt inforcemēt?
A09102	Who would not be ashamed of this intemperate accusation?
A09102	Why are M. Blackwell, and M. Charnocke deteyned styll by the L. of Canterbury?
A09102	Why are Recusants punished,& fyned for Recusancy, though they take the Oath of Allegiance?
A09102	Why had he not obiected in like manner, that they expected the libertie of breathing, and vsing the common ayre, as well as Protestants?
A09102	an oppressor, and an Idolatour?
A09102	he had reason to complayne of Catholicks sufferance, or no?
A09102	quid Dioclesianus?
A09102	quid denique iste, quihoc tēpore Ecclesiam persequitur?
A09102	so pretended, so printed, so published, so diuulged to the world?
A09102	tie, acknowledging him to be their liege Lord and King,& inferiour only to god in his Temporall Gouernment?
A09102	what desyre is here descried of calumniation?
A09102	what is he who at this tyme, doth persecute the Church?
A09102	what was Dioclesian?
A01076	10 Whether such supposed succession were afixed to the place, or aplied to the persons?
A01076	11 Whether if the succession were applied to the place, was it not cut off and discontinued when there was no vniuersall Bishop refiant at Rome?
A01076	5 Whether St. Peter ever came at Rome?
A01076	6 Allowing that St. Peter was at Rome, was he not there as an Apostle and so no more appropriate to that place then to the whole world?
A01076	7 Being an Apostle, how came he to be chiefe, yea the vniuersall Pastor over both Iewes and Gentiles?
A01076	And will P. R. the Iesuite, and the rest of the English Catholikes of the Romish faction abide by this word in good earnest?
A01076	Beyond all this the pondering of such seuerall considerations, to whose brest, or trust are they recommended?
A01076	But how doth he convey and conster that part of the oath as concerning the Popes Authority, in dealing with temporall Princes?
A01076	But how doth his outward man manage these difficulties?
A01076	Christ professed himselfe, and so instructed his Disciples, to bee humble and meeke, but how doth the Pope tread that path?
A01076	Dareth he to abide by this?
A01076	Doeth not the inferiour members, patiently, and without repugnance, beare all the offences and surcharges, descending vpon them from the head?
A01076	Doth he imagine by such his initigation to persuade the King and Realme to tolleration?
A01076	God permitteth not the diuell to haue power to destroy the elect and faithfull?
A01076	Hath hee not well collected and conected his propositions to bring out this grand conclusion of superiority ouer Princes?
A01076	Hath shee left any such Law or libertie, that in any respects the childe may renounce or disclaime his parents?
A01076	Hee that hath a power over Hell it selfe, shall not he commaund and over- rule the earth?
A01076	Here is goodly building of Castles in the ayre, Castles did I say?
A01076	Is not this the very same water of the same Cesterne?
A01076	Is there in Nature any so much as desire( much lesse meanes) of remoouing or repressing of the Head?
A01076	Is this so great an impietie thinke you?
A01076	Marke how they compell our Sauiour Iesus Christ to sallogize against himselfe?
A01076	Next vnto the body it selfe, is the issue and off- spring of the bodie, what bounds of dutie hath nature made of the children towards the Father?
A01076	Of what he may do, and what he may not doe?
A01076	Secondly, God may permit Popes( as Popes) to hold hereticall doctrine, but not to decree it, where shall wee finde consistendi locum?
A01076	Shall I coniecture at his conceite in concealing or withdrawing of these words?
A01076	Shall I thinke that he hath never read, or vtterly forgotten the Oath of Supremacy?
A01076	Then what will they say, or do, to free his Majestie from feares and ielousies?
A01076	What moderate meaning hath he found for the safegard of the Catholike consciences that haue taken that oath?
A01076	What shall we think he meaneth by proceeding against the Temporall gouernor?
A01076	Where shall we find more representatiue obedience of Natures intentions and operations, then in these originals and fountaines of Loue?
A01076	Why?
A01076	Will you examine another degree of the opperation of Nature?
A01076	and so consequently a question, whether the latter diuised Titles be likewise authorized from Christ?
A01076	and what is this limitation?
A01076	and what 〈 ◊ 〉 they make for Pope Ioane, whose stay standeth vnrefuted?
A01076	are they not euery one wholly and absolutely in the Popes discretion?
A01076	being declared not as positiue out of the word, but expository, by a sence which the Pope assumeth?
A01076	called the subiects of the Catholike Church?
A01076	except such his Pastorship were rather Apostolicall then Episcopall?
A01076	for feare that his Holinesse be questioned and limited in his owne powre and preeminence?
A01076	is it incident and appropriate to his Princely Scepter, to mayntaine the religion now established in his Dominions?
A01076	making in the meane time no Religion of the limitting, lessening, and detracting from the Soveraignes Title and pre- eminence?
A01076	must not they refuse to sweare vnto that clause of recognition also?
A01076	or if hee haue such a Rule ouer Princes themselues, why not also ouer the Subordinate Officers of the Kingdome?
A01076	that professeth learning, who well knoweth that wee will presently deny the Popish to be the Catholike Church?
A01076	that we haue not departed from the Church?
A01076	when hee hath such an argument ab authoritate to a rest him to stand vnto it?
A01076	which for some hundreths of yeares after Christ, and since the vsurpation Papall for a long time together hath come to passe?
A01076	will Religion allow him more liberty against the highest, then against the meaner Substitutes?
A01076	yea, though the father should( as oft as out of iudgement hee doth) cast off or disinherite his sonne?
A20647	11 The blood of the Martyres was the milke which nourished the Primitiue Church, in her infancy, and shall it be too hard for our digestion now?
A20647	112 Where then shall we hope, that these men will stoppe or limit their blasphemies?
A20647	14 And( to proceede farther in Christs Instruction) are these things said of you for Christs sake?
A20647	15 Is there not a Decretall amongst you, by which it Is made Treason to offend a Cardinall?
A20647	18 Was it not Prodigium Obedientiae, as Sedulius iustly calles it, in Fryar Ruffin to go preach naked?
A20647	22 And what is your recompence?
A20647	22 Why therefore shall not the French, and Italian, and olde English lawes giue occasion of Martyrdome in the same cases, as these new lawes shall?
A20647	27 And is there any Charitie in this Doctrine, or in this act of Refusall?
A20647	30 And was not this your case, before the Breues came?
A20647	32 VVhen any of these reasons inuite them, how small causes are sufficient to awake and call vp this temporall Authoritie?
A20647	37 And haue not you beene proceeded with, in Ordinarie course of Iustice, as Traytors, for Rebellions, and Conspiracies, and Tumults?
A20647	38 Or was the Author thereof no good Catholicke?
A20647	38 What high stiles did many Christian and Orthodoxe Emperours assume to themselues?
A20647	42 And is it not a stange precipitation to vow their helpe to all his errours?
A20647	47 If they doe thus much when they are Serui papae, what will they doe when they are famuli?
A20647	5 And is there any matter of Faith in this Decretall?
A20647	9 With how much curiositie and vnescapablenesse their formes of Abiuration vnder oath are exhibited?
A20647	After a dead Dogge, and after a Flea?)
A20647	And are you as sure that there are Breues, as that there is a law?
A20647	And can you produce Authors of any elder times, then within sixe hundred yeares, to haue concurr''d in this?
A20647	And do they which alleadge for the Popes Supremacy ouer Princes, intend the Pope to be Gouernour of all Creatures?
A20647	And how farre, may this courage and libertie carie vs, if the Prince command any thing in detriment of our soule?
A20647	And how hath he decreed it?
A20647	And is there any thing found in either of them, which may be a precedent to this mission?
A20647	And of Inhumanity, when he was sorry, if any body loued him?
A20647	And of desperate prouocation, when he heard of a plague likely to be in those parts, to make a vow to visit those which were infected?
A20647	And of murmuring, when he grudged and grieued, That he could find out no veniall sinne in himselfe?
A20647	And were there not some degrees of spirituall pride in Gonzaga, who is praised because he had a paire of patched hose in Delicijs?
A20647	And what is this Essentiall truth so euident out of Scripture, which designes the Catholique Church?
A20647	And wil they from this argue in Constantine a power, to open and shut hel gates?
A20647	And will they endanger al those Catholique authors to this eternall damnation, which haue violated this Donation of Constantine by publique bookes?
A20647	Are not many of you d parted ● ro ● your promise in baptisme to our Chu ● ch?
A20647	Are you as sure that these Breues, or that any Breues can binde your Conscience in this Case, as you were before, that the law could?
A20647	Are you( if you be called Traytors for refusing the Oath) reproued for anie part of his Commandements?
A20647	At least why should Campian, and those which were executed before these new statutes, be any better Martyres then they?
A20647	Because( saies he) if it were affoorded Christ ● belongs it not to his Church, which is bone of his bone?
A20647	But how shall wee beleeue that these miracles are from God, or that he doth them in testimony of that mans sanctity?
A20647	But to whom shall these men be subiect in the meane time?
A20647	But what?
A20647	By what way then, and at what time came this Authoritie into them, if it were once out?
A20647	Christ appointed twelue, whom hee might send to Preach; but what?
A20647	Did the Popes in their Bulls, intimate any illegitimation, or vsurpation, or touch vpon any such statute?
A20647	Doth he gouerne Sea, and Elements?
A20647	For since the Pope is the Church, how can you diuide the Church from the Court?
A20647	Hee Preached Christ; And what did hee Preach of him?
A20647	How lame then and vnperfect is this spirituall principality, which can affoord but one halfe?
A20647	How man ● Kings are Saints?
A20647	Is it for any of these, that you say, A Clergy man can not be a traytor, though he rebell ● because he is no subiect?
A20647	Is it for hauing established a Primacy vpon that Bishoppe, aboue his fellow Patriarches, which was so long litigious?
A20647	Is not ciuill obedience either really or by intention and implication sworne by euery subiect to the King in his birth, and after?
A20647	Is there any charitie to the Church, or partie, or faction, which you haue in this Kingdom?
A20647	Is there any to your self?
A20647	It was the seede of the Church, out of which we sprung; and shall wee grudge to Tithe our selues to God, in any proportion that hee will accept?
A20647	Not but that they confesse, that there are also some other wayes besides martyrdome to escape Purgatorie; else how got Lypsius so soone to heauen?
A20647	O what spirituall Calenture possesses you, to make this hard shift to destroy your selues?
A20647	Or any part thereof?
A20647	Or d ● d they goe about to aduance the right Heire in the Spanish ● nuasion?
A20647	Or for enriching him with a Patrimony, and Priuiledges almost equall to their owne?
A20647	Or for withdrawing him from the iawes of the Barbarous deuourers of Italy?
A20647	Or must they stay, to aske and obtaine leaue of their Clergie, to depose such a transgressor?
A20647	Or that he ouer whom the Emperour had supreame temporall authority, should haue authority ouer the Emperour in temporall causes?
A20647	So that of this place, that Archbishop of whom I spoke before, exclaimes, who can endure this?
A20647	Thus farre Feuardentius charges vs. 36 And is it not your case also, to for ● ait your Martyrdome vpon the same circumstances?
A20647	To such a one as will be content to resigne, when so euer the other will aske forgiuenesse?
A20647	To what King haue Churches or Altars beene erected?
A20647	Wee therefore repute OTHO Emperour; For, if the Electors would neuer agree, should the Apostolicke Sea alwayes be without a defender?
A20647	What King hath done any miracles?
A20647	What infallible assurance could they haue of this, to excuse them of disobedience in going, or indiscretion in swearing?
A20647	Who would wish S. Henrie the Dane any health, that had seene him, When wormes crawled out of a corrupted Vlcer in his Knee, put them in againe?
A20647	and haue these two Breues made your case to differ so much from his, that that which was lawfull to him, may not be so to you?
A20647	and may not the Pope as well Canonize the whole Spanish Fleete, which perished in 88. for your Catholique faith, and Ecclesiastique immunitie?
A20647	and that he refused to put on a paire of old bootes, because a worshipfull man had worne them?
A20647	and that when his handes did cleaue with colde, he would put on no gloues?
A20647	how durst hee say, that this kissing of the popes feete, was established in saint Luke, when the sinner kissed Christs feete?
A20647	or did those which vndertooke for you, euer intend this forsaking?
A20647	or doe they thinke that the will and commandements of God are deriued to vs onely by the way of the Pope?
A20647	or hath the blood of any men executed by those lawes, died your Martyrologes with any Rubriques?
A20647	or this, That it is better to sinne against God, then our spirituall Father, because he can reconcile vs to God, but no body to him?
A20647	or was the way of the right Heire Catholiquely prepared by Dolemans booke?
A20647	wil you so, in obeying him, disobey him,& swallow his conclusions,& yet accuse his fashiō of prouing them?
A70779	''T is True, and you say well, Oaths only serve till Truth- speaking comes, and you say, it is come to you; But how shall we know that?
A70779	* This was Chrysostom''s Exhortation Now it s said, How can we Trade without an Oath?
A70779	A. Thou wilt say that also concerning thy Wife; How is it now Adultery, which was sometime suffered?
A70779	Again, Let none say to me, What if any lay on me a Necessity of Swearing?
A70779	And how doth he swear by himself?
A70779	And how should those Honest Men invent one?
A70779	And how then is it not Confusion, that a Christian must be instructed, that he must not swear?
A70779	And if it was of Evil, how was it commanded in the Law?
A70779	And of thy Right Eye; What if I have a Delight in it, and be inflamed with the Love of it,& c.?
A70779	And thou shalt Swear the Lord liveth in Truth and Righteousness, and Judgment,& c. And how doth the Gospel forbid us to Swear?
A70779	And what if he do not believe?
A70779	And what more effectual Remedy can any People propose against the notorious Abuse and evil Consequence of Swearing, then Truth- speaking?
A70779	And what was this, tell me now?
A70779	And what''s the Meaning of a Writing?
A70779	Answer me in Truth now: If I had sworn alwayes, and at every season, what Priviledge would my Principality have?
A70779	B. Wilt thou allow the same also to me?
A70779	But Paul also swore, as they say?
A70779	But he feeds daily Forswearers and great Swearers, and will he give thee up to Famish, because thou hearkenest to him?
A70779	But in the Laws which Men command thou darest alledge no such thing, as, What if this or that,& c?
A70779	But much rather, why should we be imposed upon?
A70779	But such Distrust ought not to reign in the Faithful: But if we trust not Words, what should an Oath do?
A70779	But this is not so, nor can any think so: For God sweareth by none; for how can he, seeing he is Lord and Maker of all things?
A70779	But thou sayest, We have heard that God himself sometimes swore: The holy Scriptures record that; But is there any thing better then God?
A70779	But thou wilt say perhaps, What shall I do; he neither doth nor will believe me, unless I Swear?
A70779	But what do I speak of these?
A70779	But what shall I say of Oaths of the Courts that are left?
A70779	But what wilt thou say to me of the old Covenant?
A70779	But what wouldst thou have?
A70779	Can it any way be changed?
A70779	Come, tell me for what Cause an Oath was introduced, and why it was allowed?
A70779	Darest not thou that art initiated touch the holy Table?
A70779	Do we therefore think we do not sin, because they are not punished?
A70779	Dost thou give to some as Infants a kind of first Food, that they may at length receive a succeeding kind of Meat?
A70779	Dost thou make that Law an Oath, which forbids to Swear?
A70779	Doth he fear God, or doth he not fear him?
A70779	For, if one would have a more Venerable Man, would not the Case have Disgrace in it?
A70779	For, tell me, Thou halest a man to an Oath; What dost thou seek?
A70779	HOUT, that exceeds all Iniquity and Audaciousness: What then is to be done?
A70779	Hast thou therefore received Letters and Badges that thou shouldst lose thy Soul?
A70779	Hath he forsworn?
A70779	He may swear, who can not repent of his Oath: And what did the Lord swear?
A70779	He that brings the Fire by which an House is burnt, is he a Stranger to the Burning?
A70779	He that makes no Conscience of that Law that forbids Lying, will he make any Conscience of Forswearing?
A70779	Hear, ye CLERGY- MEN, who bring the HOLY GOSPELS for men to swear upon; How can ye be secure from that Oath, who sow the Seed of Perjury?
A70779	How can they ever hope to look their Lord with Comfort in the Face, who so severely Treat their Fellow- Servants?
A70779	How just and severe a Censure is this out of an Heathen''s Mouth upon the Practice of Dissolute Christians?
A70779	How low is Man faln from the primitive Rule of Life?
A70779	IF TO SWEAR IS FOUND TO BE DEVILISH, how are they to be punished who Forswear?
A70779	IF TO SWEAR TRULY BE A CRIME, and a transgressing of the Commandment, where shall we place Perjury?
A70779	If an Oath be forbidden to men, and a man imitates God in not Swearing, how is it that God is related in the holy Scriptures to swear?
A70779	If he be not faithful in Word, how will God by any means be the Witness of an Oath for him, who is destitute of Faith, to which God hath Respect?
A70779	If it be a great Good, not to Swear at all; what is it to Impose an Oath?
A70779	If it was not lawful for all to Name God simply, how great Audaciousness is it to call it in Witness?
A70779	Is God absent by this Means?
A70779	Is Religion placed in a Leaf?
A70779	Is it because an Oath ministred unto Freemen is as it were the Rack& Torture tendered unto them?
A70779	Is it not that they speak like Men?
A70779	Is it that we abuse that simply, this not so?
A70779	Is that Impossible?
A70779	Lastly, If thou shalt impose on any a Necessity of Swearing in the holy House, how horrible an Oath dost thou enjoyn, if thou dost so?
A70779	Let us now discourse concerning the Jewish Law to day: What is that, will he say?
A70779	Make God, the Great God of Heaven and Earth our Caution in worldly Controversies, as if we would bind him to obtain our own Ends?
A70779	Moreover, Who gave Power to Popes, to break the Command of God?
A70779	No, said the Bishop; and why?
A70779	No, thou seest that it is not for this: What gainest thou then, tell me now?
A70779	Ought not one even to Dread when God is named?
A70779	Paul Hungerd; and do thou chuse rather to Hunger then to transgress any of God''s Commandments: Why art thou so Unbelieving?
A70779	Perjury is a Denying of God: What need of God in this Matter?
A70779	Say, So may I not be blind?
A70779	Shalt thou chuse to do and to suffer all things, that thou mayst not swear, and shall not he Reward thee?
A70779	Surely it doth not prohibit an Oath, but requires a true one?
A70779	Tell me now, How are Parrets known?
A70779	Tell me now, how great Madness is it?
A70779	Tell me, my Friend, What dost thou get by Swearing?
A70779	That Christ is a Priest forever: Is that Uncertain?
A70779	The Word Hypocrisie signifies thus much, that which being one thing appears another; How then falleth he into Hypocrisie that sweareth?
A70779	Then said the Bishop, Why wilt thou not swear before a Judge,& c?
A70779	Thou a Worm, Dust and Ashes, and a Vapour; darest thou snatch thy Lord, who art such an one for a Surety, and compellest to accept him?
A70779	Thou hast lost both thy self and him: But hath he not Forsworn?
A70779	Thou wilt say; How can it be, that the same is sometimes Good, sometimes not?
A70779	Upon the Brink of a Precipice, or far from it?
A70779	We would fain know, if a most August Act of God''s Worship be nighest the Pit''s Brink, or farthest from it?
A70779	What Evil is it then to hale men back again upon Penalties?
A70779	What Evil therefore hath Swearing?
A70779	What Fruit gets he that often sweareth?
A70779	What Oath dost thou leave to us?
A70779	What do I speak of a Fellow- Servant?
A70779	What doth it say then of OATHS there?
A70779	What if I use an Oath Unwillingly, but to free me from Danger?
A70779	What if an Oath be written, and not pronounced with the Voice?
A70779	What if she be Nice and Curious?
A70779	What if the Books of the holy Scriptures be not used?
A70779	What if we be drawn by Necessity to give an Oath?
A70779	What is this but to contradict the natural Tendency of the Command of Christ and his Apostles?
A70779	What is this less then, Swear not at all?
A70779	What more?
A70779	What serve they for then?
A70779	What shall we say then?
A70779	What so great thing hast thou gained, as that which thou hast lost?
A70779	What then is to be done, if any require an Oath, yea, compel to Swear?
A70779	What then shall we say is beyond Yea and Nay?
A70779	What then shall we say to these things?
A70779	What then, if I shall shew thee, that it is not this only?
A70779	What then?
A70779	What then?
A70779	What then?
A70779	Where, sayes he, wouldst thou chuse to walk?
A70779	Whether an Oath be an elicit Act of Religious Virtue?
A70779	Who ever spake more seriously then our Saviour?
A70779	Who more necessary things?
A70779	Who said so?
A70779	Whom therefore do you more believe, me that do not swear, or them that do swear?
A70779	Why didst thou not rather Dye?
A70779	Why doth the Law command, that they should swear by God?
A70779	Why must Neither by any other Oath be added after such a plain Prohibition, as, My Brethren, Above all things Swear not?
A70779	Why then shall this be said to be of Evil?
A70779	Why therefore do they record that he swore?
A70779	Why?
A70779	Will you learn why they allowed them of old to Swear, not to Forswear?
A70779	Wouldst thou also learn on the contrary, how those things are not fit for a Child, which are not for a Man?
A70779	Wouldst thou have him to Forswear?
A70779	],[ London?
A70779	but being gone out, thou wouldst not touch the Head of thy Child; but touchest thou the Table, and doest not dread nor fear?
A70779	or rather because every Oath endeth with Detestation and Malediction of Perjury?
A70779	or who reaches a Sword, whereby a man is slain, is not he an Accessory to the Slaughter?
A70779	thus, But some will say, If any be forced to swear, what is to be done?
A70779	to Deceive?
A70779	— What then, if any require an Oath, and impose a Necessity of Swearing?
A70779	— Where is there any need of an Oath to him that so lives, as one that is attain''d to the height of Truth?
A68730	And how, if out of this foundation of Bellarmine it should follow, that the primitiue Church had not all necessarie power to attaine vnto her end?
A68730	And if he haue greater authority, whence I pray you should he haue it: from God or from men?
A68730	And is there any Catholike, who doth not commend their minds that are affected to that Sea, which is the foundation and strength of our faith?
A68730	And long before Gaguinus S. Bernard: f Doth not in these dates ambition, more then deuotion weare the thresholds of the Apostles?
A68730	And that which might truely be affirmed of one of them alone, to pronounce generally and indefinitly of them both?
A68730	And then what doth it helpe for the proofe of this proposition, to propound an example of a Tyrant, or the killing of a Tyrant?
A68730	And therefore if we may not sinne to gaine that to Christ, for what cause shal it be lawfull for vs to sinne?
A68730	And this is that which the Apostle writeth to the Corinthians: 3 What will you?
A68730	And why may not wee aswell vse an argument of the same kinde against this other opinion of the Diuines?
A68730	As al other things: Who doubteth, but that this is the more hainous offence which is punished more seuerely?
A68730	As though Matrimonie might be dissolued by the constitutions of the Pope?
A68730	But good God?
A68730	But let it be so: he vnderstood the cause, and iudged him worthy of censure, and therefore did excommunicate the Emperour; what then?
A68730	But this submission what is it to Ciuill iudgement and temporall iurisdiction?
A68730	But what if the Emperour will not draw his sword at the becke of the Priest?
A68730	But what is this to a Temporall kingdome?
A68730	But what of it?
A68730	Could not the Church thinke you chasten him without any harme at all to the people?
A68730	For although, they had been freed by our Sauiour his warrant, what I pray you, had this exemption auailed them to the sowing of the Gospell?
A68730	For otherwise what shall we say?
A68730	For to what end were priuiledges giuen to them, if by a common right they were not subiect to kings?
A68730	For what I pray you?
A68730	For what?
A68730	For where can this appeare?
A68730	For ● hat?
A68730	Gaudemus, extra de diuortijs?
A68730	Had this man thinke you any braine?
A68730	He hath mercie on whom he will haue mercie, and whom he will be hardneth Neither may any man say vnto him, d Why hast thou made me thus?
A68730	Hence it is, that the Prince takes himselfe to be wronged, while his Ministers are hindred in the execution of their offices?
A68730	I allow it: he was a Prophet also, it is true, and what then?
A68730	I can call in more, and that very many to testifie the truth of this matter, but what needs any more?
A68730	If false, wherefore?
A68730	If hee constrained him, by what power, by feare of what did hee constraine him?
A68730	If the Apostles had had power to dispose of the temporalties of Christians, Peter surely had not said, Did it not?
A68730	If therefore these powers be ioyned together, neither in dignities, offices, nor actions, let Bozius tell vs wherein they are ioyned?
A68730	Is it because it is at your pleasure to interprete the will of God, comprehended in the diuine Law, and in the Scriptures?
A68730	Is it so sure and certaine, that the Pope hath giuen him by the law of God more authority ouer Princes, then ouer priuate persons?
A68730	Must we beleeue the same of the Church, or of the Pope?
A68730	Now surely, there is altogether a fault amongst you, that you haue iudgements amongst you, why do you not rather suffer losse?
A68730	Or because he knew not the truth of the matter, and the doctrine of the Church?
A68730	Or did the Church all that time want learned and watchfull Pastors, and by that meanes either neglected or did not vnderstand her temporall interest?
A68730	Or if the Emperour were inferiour to God only, and the lesse could not depose the greater, how could the Christian subiects depose him?
A68730	Or in a word, that they were so fearefull, and narrow minded, that they durst not tell the Princes that which they knew?
A68730	Paul doth say, that all happened to the Iewes in figures?
A68730	That seruice, which the sire from heauen did, saith he, could not the earthly sword haue performed the same?
A68730	Then a few lines after, doth adde, that the same sword is to be vsed nutu sacerdotis: and addes not forsitan?
A68730	Thinke you so indeed?
A68730	To belieue such matters, good Lord, should I tearme it ignorance, or madnesse?
A68730	Was it fit to 〈 ◊ 〉 and confound together matters of so diuerse and differe it kinds?
A68730	Was it not more profitable for the Church that an heretike Emperour should not gouerne Catholikes?
A68730	Was not afterwards in the same Kingdome of France the change from the Carolouingi ● to the Capeuingii made with great iniustice?
A68730	What doth either the Apostle fight with himselfe, or doth Peter teach one thing and Paul another?
A68730	What if there bee no temporall state, which will or dare contest with this state which is enemie to the Ecclesiastike common- wealth?
A68730	What is the matter then?
A68730	What is this to a crowne and scepter of a temporall Maiestie?
A68730	What may we thinke?
A68730	What may wee thinke that those diuine Prelates taught the people, that there was no remedie against that Apostata, but in patience and teares?
A68730	What say the Aduersaries to this?
A68730	What say you to Ananias, what to the Corinthian, were they not cut off by the church?
A68730	What should I speake of Iulianus the successor of Constantius?
A68730	What should I vse many words?
A68730	What then?
A68730	What, did the heate of religion and the zeale of the house of God faile them?
A68730	Where then is his kingdome?
A68730	Which fault who can not plainely deprehend, in this former reasoning of Bellarmine?
A68730	Whilest it remained, did it not belong to thee, and being sould was it not in thy power?
A68730	Who would not laugh at such kind of Arguments so full of vanitie?
A68730	Why doe you forbidde vs to doe that which God commands vs to doe?
A68730	Why doe you inuade an others borders?
A68730	Why should we not in like manner, and with much more reason, hould the same iudgement of Kings?
A68730	Why then did the Church tolerate Ualens, Ualentinianus, Heraclitus, and others?
A68730	Why then might not Zacharie also serue his owne malice or loue, and after the manner of men in some part violate iustice?
A68730	Will any wise man iudge that this is lawfull for them to doe, by the example of Zacharias his Act?
A68730	and after it was sould, was it not in thine owne power?
A68730	and both to compose them themselues, and to exhort others rather to martyrdome, than to armes and insurrections, to which we are prone by nature?
A68730	and of Pius Quintus against Elizabeth, Kings of England?
A68730	and the Emperour, who was a man that affected glory so much, did he acknowledge the temporall power of that Pope ouer him?
A68730	being complete armed, and playing the souldier rather then the Pope?
A68730	both Kings of France?
A68730	by what meanes then will she reuenge herselfe?
A68730	doth S. Bernard in this case giue to the Priest any temporall power ouer the Emperour?
A68730	doth he not know, that that spirituall incision, which is proper to the Church, begā euen with the Church her self?
A68730	is it any more, then that by the patterne of that action, the Pope may now doe, as then Zacharie did?
A68730	is not this one place enough to stop all mens mouthes?
A68730	nay what if he shall draw it against the Priests beck and assent?
A68730	or Philip the Faire by Albert of Austria?
A68730	or could not an earthly sword haue executed the same office, which the fire from heauen did performe?
A68730	or doth declare that the Laickes are not competent Iudges for the Clergie?
A68730	or if he should say it, were he able to make it good by any reason or authority?
A68730	or that which God directly forbids to be done, the same may lawfully be commanded by it?
A68730	or what coherence and connexion of these two Propositions can there be?
A68730	or with what authoritie can they perswade the same vnto vs?
A68730	shall I come to you with a rod or in loue and in the spirit of meekenesse?
A68730	that he might flatter the Emperour?
A68730	that it should bee thought that he might bee by Boniface depriued of the right of his crowne, and an other to bee substituted in his place?
A68730	vpon Philip the Faire, how little it profited, nay how much it hurt the Church?
A68730	was this conference betweene the Pope and the Emperour, of wordes, and not of things: of the name, and not of the right and power?
A68730	were not the rotten members of the Church wo nt to be cut off euen from her infancie& first beginning?
A68730	what should he doe with the Name, if another carie away his Right and Power?
A68730	where is his Temporall dominion?
A68730	whether is that gentle and humble confession banished out of our world?
A68730	which is, that hee may giue his consent to a people for the like causes& respects to put down their king?
A68730	why reach you your sithe into another mans haruest?
A09103	& i ● the Pope thus bynding them( look to himself) an oultrec ● i ● dance of tyrany?
A09103	145. whether they can make new articles of faith or no?
A09103	50. Who lay the scandall of Balaam, Catholicks or Protestants?
A09103	ABOVT RECOVRSE MADE to the Bishop of Rome for decision, whether the Oath might lawfully be taken by English Catholiks, or no?
A09103	ABOVT THE DEATH OF HENRY the third King of France: whether it may be an example of the Popes allowance of such murt ● ers?
A09103	AND Whether the said Pope hath Power to make new Articles of faith?
A09103	About recourse made to the Bishop of Rome for decisiō, whether the Oath might lawfully be taken by English Catholicks, or no?
A09103	About the death of Henry the third King of France: whether it may be an example of allowance of such murthers?
A09103	Againe, that he saith an Vnity that is proper to Christ hims ● l ●?
A09103	Againe, where will he find in all Bellarmyne that solamisericordia, only mercy, is the entire obiect of our confidence?
A09103	All which if we suppose( and who, against the authority of such manner of witnesses, can make any doubt or exception?)
A09103	And are all these thinges only Ceremoniall without substance, or essence of religion?
A09103	And are not other Catholikes deliuered from the guylt therof by the long and diligent search of iustice made thereabout?
A09103	And are not these distinctions needfull in this affaire?
A09103	And are not these goodly definitions( thinke you) for so great and graue a man to produce?
A09103	And are not these words playne, that the whole action of Ioseph his selling into Egypt was by Gods permissiue prouidence?
A09103	And are these particulers, or any one of thē which you haue so much vrged, for this purpose, to be verified of Innocentius?
A09103	And are these poyntes also not substantiall, nor any wayes touching religion, but Ceremonies?
A09103	And are these sleight pretenses Syr VVilliam?
A09103	And besides this wil M. Barlow haue no respect to the cases and genders in Latin?
A09103	And can any thing be spoken more cleerly for vs, and for our cause, then this?
A09103	And can there be any thing more contradictory then this?
A09103	And can there be any thing more contumeliously and Lucian- like spoken then this?
A09103	And could M. Barlow choose but see this when he wrote his Reply?
A09103	And did it not happen to our Sauiour hims ● l ● e, and S. Paul, and other great Seruants of God?
A09103	And did not I tell you, that you should haue mysteries?
A09103	And did not they cyte many places of Scriptures, to proue the equity& necessity therof?
A09103	And did not this deserue, that M. Barlow should haue brought forth authenticall testimony to the contrary?
A09103	And did this man I pray you send these letters and Frederickes picture to the Soldan?
A09103	And do not all Protestants the like at this day, in all places where they are, both in Polonia, Austria, Bohemia, Styria, and els where?
A09103	And do we not see what prophane trifling this is?
A09103	And do you grant thus much Syr?
A09103	And do you heare this doctrine, or do you belieue that he saith truth therin?
A09103	And do you not thinke, that this Gētlemā can speak Frēch?
A09103	And do you see his vanytie?
A09103	And do you see now heer ●, how zealous M. Barlow is become vpon the suddayne for defence of consecrated vessels in the Church?
A09103	And do you see, how he seeketh a hole to runne out at?
A09103	And doe you not see what gnibling this is?
A09103	And doe you not think ● he hath played well his prize?
A09103	And doth he not seeme to speake well for his fee?
A09103	And doth not M. Barlow trim vp Authors well that passe through his hands to make them serue his purpose?
A09103	And doth not that doctour conde ● ● e all the articles the ● in?
A09103	And doth not the very life,& soule of the Church depend of these two things, a true Ministry, and lawful Head?
A09103	And doth not thē M. Barlow for his writing deserue a good reward of a siluer ● hetstone?
A09103	And doth not this man deserue to be credited, speaking in his owne behalfe before Pope, all writers, and whatsoeuer other testimony?
A09103	And doth not this reason cleare as well Blondus as Petrus de Vineis?
A09103	And doth not your Reader see, to what straites of absurdityes, your folly hath brought you?
A09103	And doth this Ceremony of discipline please M. Barlow, Or doth his Church admit the same?
A09103	And finally those last words, that they would not indure it, written in great letters, where doth he find them?
A09103	And hath the Chāpion M. Barlow any thing to reply for his Lord in this?
A09103	And haue you euer heard such a dreame, or deliration in one that professeth wit?
A09103	And how could I then by those two letters of T. M. meane Tua, or Tanta Maiestas?
A09103	And how could he conceiue then, that Medina should meane, that this sheep must haue time to cōsult, whether shee must fly, or no?
A09103	And how then are these, and such other places brought in for witnesse, as though they had somewhat to say against vs?
A09103	And how then can M. Barlow say, that the Apologer said no such thing?
A09103	And how then can this be called fraudlent impudēcy?
A09103	And how then doth he relate the procurers of the poyson doubtfully, and the instrument certainely?
A09103	And how then is Iordanis conuersus retr ● rs ● m, with this Minister?
A09103	And how then was the error espied and amended?
A09103	And how will M. Barlow now defend this position, that they were not like in specie nor in indi ● iduo?
A09103	And i ● this Sy ● so bad an argument?
A09103	And if he find them not, who gaue him leaue to add them, and crowne his owne inuention with Capitall letters?
A09103	And if no error, wherin was the amendment?
A09103	And if not, what sufficient proofes,& notable expressing of her griefes doth this Minister meane?
A09103	And if they be different, how can they then be reciprocal in signification& translation?
A09103	And if they could not hope it, how could they pray for it, but only in iest?
A09103	And in this case I would demand of M. Barlow, what ground he hath to scoffe so at these three miracles here set down as he doth?
A09103	And is it so Syr?
A09103	And is it so?
A09103	And is not passion a great infirmity, that driueth a man to these absurdities?
A09103	And is not this Minister well perswaded of himselfe, and his owne learning, that thus craketh?
A09103	And is not this S ● r a good freing?
A09103	And is not this a good reason, say I?
A09103	And is not this a very learned Axiome?
A09103	And is not this a very sheepish apprehension indeed?
A09103	And is not this a worthy dispute?
A09103	And is not this good dealing, when ther ● are so many authors o ● credit in print, to a ● ● ow this s ● orie?
A09103	And is not this good stuffe?
A09103	And is not this humor of malicious contradicting verie fit for the Diuell indeed, who therof hath his name of Sathan?
A09103	And is not this man more fit to be set agayne to Inspeach, and Grammar rules, then to be imployed in writing for defence of his Maiesty?
A09103	And is not this per ● idious treachery in M. Barlow to make him his chiefest pillar, who hath not one word o ● the matter in controuersy?
A09103	And is not this plaine inough?
A09103	And is not this thinke you, fit for a Prince to read, or pre ● ēded Prelate to write?
A09103	And is not this very confidently spoken trow yow?
A09103	And is not this well proued, thinke yow?
A09103	And is the infamation of enemies sufficient with you, M. Barlow, to condemne a man?
A09103	And is there no substantiall point neyther in all this, but only matter of Ceremony?
A09103	And is thi ● conformable to the practice& doctrine of M. Barlows Church?
A09103	And is this conforme to the present Church of England?
A09103	And is this reuelatiō trow you so vncertain?
A09103	And may not this happen to the holiest man that is?
A09103	And now M. Barlow, is this a calme perswasiō?
A09103	And now how do you thinke that M. Barlow will shift of this important point appert ● ● ning to conscience in Religion?
A09103	And now what do you think, that M. Barlow out of his ingeniosity will find to bring for maintenance, that this was a true contradiction in Bellarmine?
A09103	And the same S. Hierom talking to an Heretick, saith: Cur post quadringentos annos d ● cere ● os ● iteris, quod ante nesciuimus?
A09103	And the word of God was made vnto Elias, saying, hast thou not seene Achab humilia ● ed before me?
A09103	And was not this a vertuous man trow you; who to pleasure the Turkes, sworn enemies of Christ, would thus deale with Christians?
A09103	And was not this rather charity, then hypocrisy?
A09103	And was the Religion thereof the Protestant religion, or ours?
A09103	And was there euer sentence so interpreted as this?
A09103	And what Catholicke Religion, for defence wherof those Catholicke Princes in S. Augustines dayes did make those lawes so commended by him?
A09103	And what can be required more to the vnity of names?
A09103	And what contradiction is there heere; A man may place some con ● idence, but the sure ● t way is to place none?
A09103	And what did the Pope more in this case thē this?
A09103	And what doth he alleage against these foure waie ●?
A09103	And what is his reason trow you?
A09103	And what is that?
A09103	And what is this against me?
A09103	And what maketh this against vs, or for the Protestants?
A09103	And what maketh this to the purpose?
A09103	And what more orderly proceeding could there be then this, in an act of such quality?
A09103	And what now hath M. Barlow to say to this?
A09103	And what reply is now made( thinke you) to all this?
A09103	And what right hand of theirs is the right hand of iniquity?
A09103	And what shall we say now to this?
A09103	And what then will yow say to such forgery& falsity?
A09103	And what wil M. Barlow say to this?
A09103	And what will M. Barlow say to this point of discipline?
A09103	And what will M. Barlow say to this?
A09103	And what will the Apologer say heere?
A09103	And what will the discreet reader hould M. Barlow for his sex?
A09103	And what will you say to such malicious follie, or foolish malice?
A09103	And when you say, If I be a true man, this is so, you may be thought to doubt, whether your selfe be a true man or no?
A09103	And wher in thē?
A09103	And where the ● is the contradiction?
A09103	And whether iesting with God in prayer be lawfull by M. Barlowes Theologie, I would also gladly know?
A09103	And whether the sayd Pope hath power to make new Articles of faith?
A09103	And whither would Isay haue sent him, but to the Gouernours thereof?
A09103	And who could vse more myld and moderate words to expresse the dutifull mindes of Catholiks, towards his Maiesty, then he doth in these?
A09103	And who then that shall read these wordes will not thinke them all to be the wordes of F. Persons?
A09103	And who will not laugh at these two profundityes of M. Barlowes diuinity, neither of them being iustifyable in the eyes of any man of meane capacity?
A09103	And why doth M. Doctour Reynolds by M. Barlowes owne, ● ● ● ● i ● ony, giue the Title not of Head ● but of Supreme Gouernour?
A09103	And why good Sir?
A09103	And why had not this bene answered?
A09103	And why had not you done this also, if your mind had not 〈 ◊ 〉 impious?
A09103	And why is Iordani ● now turned backward, saith the letter ● Why is this Ministers voice contrary to the voice& sens ● of all other Protestants?
A09103	And why now had not M. Barlow recited the whole sentence, as it lay in Binniu ●?
A09103	And why then did M. Barlow cut them of?
A09103	And why then doe you beginne with so notorious vntruthes?
A09103	And why was that?
A09103	And why, good M. Barlow?
A09103	And why?
A09103	And why?
A09103	And wil M. Barlow allow of this recourse?
A09103	And will M. Barlow deny thi ●?
A09103	And will M. Barlow make this an example of spirituall obedience to temporall Princes, that was thus extorted?
A09103	And will M. Barlows Church admit this doctrine of Masses and celebrating the Martyn feastes?
A09103	And will any man belieue this, that he will be so stout?
A09103	And will here M. Barlow againe cry out of Pro ● ● nda Sathanae, and of the hornes of Sedecias?
A09103	And will not the Catholicks of England vse this speac ● also vnto their King?
A09103	And would any learned man fal into such absurdyties, and so shew his ignorance both in things& times?
A09103	And would his Maiesty haue admitted the messenger, or message?
A09103	And yet in another place he canua ● eth thē againe with the same Prescription, saying: Qui estis vos?
A09103	Are not his mortifications knowne?
A09103	Are not these good inferences?
A09103	Are not these playne contradictions?
A09103	Are not these pretty fooleries M. Barlow?
A09103	Are our Priests in England, or on this side the seas, more incumbred with ignorance then the Ministers?
A09103	Are these the poyntes wherein Cardinall Bellarmine made his comparison, or noe?
A09103	Are they not all gates of Hell?
A09103	Are they not executed, that were culpable therof?
A09103	Are they not perspicuous?
A09103	Are they not still in the same degree of difference and oppositiō as before?
A09103	Are you so mutable within the compasse of two pages?
A09103	Augustine speaking of I ● dian, saith thus: Iulian was an vnbelieuing Emperour, was he not an Apostata?
A09103	Be wise ô ye Kings, and serue the Lord in feare: if not, w ● at ● the danger?
A09103	Besides this, the sayd Latin translation leaueth out the word tertius, and nameth only Alexander: will you assigne this also to the Printer?
A09103	But I may better retort this interrogation vpon M. Barlow, and aske him; But first, who taught him to ly so loud?
A09103	But I pray you Syr, whom we call vsually V ● spergensis, is not this name Conradus of Lichtenaw?
A09103	But I would aske M. Barlow, how he commeth to know this secret?
A09103	But I would aske him wherin?
A09103	But I would demaund of M. Barlow, what was the question betweene vs?
A09103	But alas is there no end of exprobration against the Innocent, for the nocent?
A09103	But did the Pope( saith he) write these bookes in defence of himself, to consute Petrus de Vineis?
A09103	But do you thinke that he wil stand to this now?
A09103	But first who girt the sword to the Popes side?
A09103	But good Syr, are you not ashamed to trifle in this manner, and to be taken euery foote in false consequences?
A09103	But good Syr, is your nature such, or lack of grace so great, that you can speake nothing without manifest falshood?
A09103	But hath he any more to say, thinke you, against the first question?
A09103	But here I would aske M. Barlow, why he leaueth out going to Church, which was the first part of the condition, and nameth only whore- domes?
A09103	But how doth be proue by this, that I confesse the Breue to forbid temporall Obedience?
A09103	But how doth he proue it?
A09103	But how doth this inference of yours hould?
A09103	But how is this proued?
A09103	But if without effect,& that he could not conclude; who should giue iudgment of the matter?
A09103	But to what end is all this?
A09103	But was Queene Elizabeth abused therein?
A09103	But was there euer such a Philosopher?
A09103	But what Church was that?
A09103	But what Sophistry, Syr, do you find in these wordes of mine now recited ● Are they not playne?
A09103	But what Syr, to distinguish or vse distinctions in a matter that may haue diuers senses or intendmēts?
A09103	But what dost thou say King Dauid?
A09103	But what dot ● he meane by peremptory inforcement?
A09103	But what doth he answere to the substance of the matter?
A09103	But what doth this proue?
A09103	But what helpeth this M. Barlowes cause?
A09103	But what iarre is this?
A09103	But what if all this were true, as it is not?
A09103	But what if here also vpon examination we find M. Barlow a lier?
A09103	But what inference doth he make of this thinke you?
A09103	But what is the question in controuersy?
A09103	But what is this to our purpos ●, that do talke of the spirituall Head of the Church?
A09103	But what is this to our purpose, who do seeke which of the Otho''s did slay Philip?
A09103	But what is this to the example of S. Pauls conflict betweene sense and reason, flesh and spirit, alleaged by M. Barlow?
A09103	But what is this vnto our Oath?
A09103	But what maketh this to the purpose we haue in hand?
A09103	But what more?
A09103	But what one author can he alleadg of any credit, that saith the same?
A09103	But what proueth this very Author against the Pope in this matter?
A09103	But what reason is there that I should belieue more this Author against the Pope, then the Pope against him?
A09103	But what say you now in this your last Reply after mature deliberation?
A09103	But what sayth M. Barlow to this?
A09103	But what sayth he, if there be a false assumption, and an vntrue applycation by the conscience, is it then erroneous, and not binding?
A09103	But what sense or construction, thinke you doth M. Barlow make of these words?
A09103	But what?
A09103	But what?
A09103	But where can he find that Azorius saith this?
A09103	But wherof M. Barlow?
A09103	But wherto now doth all this Preface pertaine, of Princes iealousies?
A09103	But who denieth this?
A09103	But who doth not see the folly of these arguments, which can moue nothing but laughter, or stomacke?
A09103	But who maketh that Church?
A09103	But who seeth not the malicious ● ● cophancy o ● this consequence?
A09103	But who shall determine or define the Controuersy?
A09103	But whoseeth not heere that neither the antecedent nor consequent haue any force?
A09103	But why do we stand spending of time in these tri ● ● ing obiections brought in by M. Barlow against himselfe?
A09103	But why doth he name one only, and he dead?
A09103	But why then was it changed?
A09103	But why, doth he shew himself so enraged?
A09103	But will you see this our doughty Doctour ouerthrown& confoūded both in him selfe, and by himselfe?
A09103	But yet what followes h ● erof, therfore the Pope stirred not vp the Sonne against the Father?
A09103	But ● herin standeth the agrieuance?
A09103	But, why did he not giue me 〈 ◊ 〉 a speedy answere, without tryfling, and so dispatch both me, and himselfe quickly?
A09103	Can M. Barlow say any thing iustly against this, if he will not calumniate?
A09103	Can any thing be spoken more plainly?
A09103	Can not these two stand togeather?
A09103	Can this be denyed with any shew of shamefastnes?
A09103	Can we gather grapes of thrones, or figgs of thistles?
A09103	Catholickes or Protestants?
A09103	Chapter he demandeth, why thē had not the Apostoles depriued Nero and Domitius of their Empires?
A09103	Chapter, he demandeth further, why the Apostles,& first Christians had not elected some new King Christan for the good of the Church at the beginning?
A09103	Chapters togeather:& in the end what leaue obtayned they, but against his will, when he durst no longer deny them?
A09103	Could the Printer also change the letter in the text?
A09103	Could they hope for this, seeing her now an old woman, and weakened also by many diseases?
A09103	Could this power come aswell from a Feminine, as a Masculine Mon ● rch?
A09103	Dare he stand to this triall out of S. Augustines workes themselues?
A09103	De quo caelo cecidit?
A09103	De quo mari emersit?
A09103	Dic de qua terra germinauit?
A09103	Did S Ambrose by this acknowledge that the Emperour had higher Authority, then he, in Church- matters?
A09103	Did euer any affirme, that this confidence of our merits did depend on them, as vpon the obiect of the same?
A09103	Did not diuers Councells set forth Credes with sundry explanations that were not before?
A09103	Did not he meane diuine fayth, or Theologicall beliefe?
A09103	Did not we graunt also, that Kings within their Kingdomes, may cause Prouinciall Councels to be made by their Bishops, Archbishops,& Metropolitans?
A09103	Did she make so notable a demonstration of her owne griefes which she had therof?
A09103	Did she put any man to death, any of the doers or counsellours therof?
A09103	Did she shed teares?
A09103	Did she vest her selfe with s ● ckloth for the same?
A09103	Did you not promise vs surer argumentes, then presumptions?
A09103	Do not these words affirme plainly, that Otho the Emperour, and not Otho the Count slew Philip?
A09103	Do not you see that this is playne cauelling indeed, and not disputing?
A09103	Do the Protestants agree to this interpretation?
A09103	Do they not cleare the doubt in controuersy?
A09103	Do they not disclay me from the English Hierarchie?
A09103	Do they not remoue confusion?
A09103	Do they passe( perhaps) Gods power to doe them?
A09103	Do you not see how intricate this matter is,& hard to resolue?
A09103	Do you see M. Barlow, wherein the comparison is made?
A09103	Do you see heere M. Barlows manner of writing?
A09103	Do you see how earne ● t the man is?
A09103	Do you see what a question he maketh, and how farre from the purpose?
A09103	Do you see, how hard a matter this is to bring a supposall into a conclusion?
A09103	Doe not his friends take pitty of his folly?
A09103	Doe not you thinke that he hath spoken well,& much to the purpose?
A09103	Doe they not still deny our Sauiours descent into hell?
A09103	Doe you not behould the poore man in what straites he is, to say somewhat?
A09103	Doe you note how many defects of truth are discouered in so smal an allegation?
A09103	Doe you see how the man speaketh in mysteries?
A09103	Doth Cuspinian say, that Manfred poysoned him?
A09103	Doth M. Barlow speake like an intellig ● nt man?
A09103	Doth he allow of these iealousies as proceeding from sanctity?
A09103	Doth he commend that fact of Salomon for making away his brother Adoniah, for asking only Abishag to be his wife?
A09103	Doth he euer say ● that his Maiesty offered ABVSE?
A09103	Doth he interpret it to signifie any particuler vertue?
A09103	Doth he no ● say, that some confidence may be reposed in our workes, so we be sure they be me ● itorious, and that we auoid pride?
A09103	Doth here the Prophet speake of factes, think yow, or else of fai ● h?
A09103	Doth not common sense teach it to be so?
A09103	Doth not crucifying imply as much as self whipping?
A09103	Doth not euery man see the itching humour of adulation, discouered here vpon any least occasion?
A09103	Doth not here malyce, and folly striue which of them shall haue the vpper hand in M. Barlow?
A09103	Doth not this man stoope low for help thinke you?
A09103	Doth not this proue that a selfe- chastizing of a mans bodie is pleasing to God?
A09103	Doth this Pre ● ate thinke there is a God?
A09103	Doth this import voluntary or inuoluntary whipping?
A09103	Durst any man in her dayes ● ut to death a kitchin boy of her house, much lesse of her bloud, without her knowledge, approbation, and consent?
A09103	First this: As for the Catholike Religion( sayth he) can there be one word found in all this Oath, tending to matter of Religion?
A09103	For I would aske, what fayth or beliefe, diuine or humane, Christian or naturall ● did the Apologer meane in his demaund?
A09103	For approbation of matters concerning faith?
A09103	For did not Bloudu ● write as an historiā,& not as a seruant?
A09103	For first where, or when can he shew, that we stick not at the substance of the Oath, but only at ● he forme?
A09103	For how many falshoodes, ignorances, and forgeryes haue bene shewed to be in this one dispute of his?
A09103	For how shall the Reader try the truth o ● this obiection?
A09103	For if that had bene omitted, then why had not M. Barlow now supplyed that defect, with aleadging or quoting some Author, that testifieth the same?
A09103	For if you should demand of the Catholicke, for example, why he belieueth the Reall Presence; he would answere you, because it is reuealed by God?
A09103	For is any thing strange in Gods prouidence( saith he) which seeth things to come, as if they were present and existent?
A09103	For obserue those words, al obedience that he oweth to his Maiestie, what is that?
A09103	For that he did not tell them distinctly which of the clauses contayned Arianis ● ●?
A09103	For that this perhaps, is called the Oath of Allegiance?
A09103	For what hath the malefactour for crime, or hereticke for schisme to doe in this affaire?
A09103	For what haue hornes to do with distinctions?
A09103	For what is there here to signify the Church, to signify heretikes, to signify this in- bred right?
A09103	For what is truth or propriety, that ● assiers vncertainty?
A09103	For what now I pray you is become of all this sharpe charge, and virulent accu ● ation of Pope Alexander?
A09103	For what puny- Sophister is there in Oxford, or Cambridge, who knoweth not that, species producatur de pluribus differentibus numero?
A09103	For where I demand, And needeth there no more, Syr, for proofe but this?
A09103	For where I pray you, as Blondus forced to this confession?
A09103	For who I pray you made him?
A09103	For who but God can reueale to a man what shall be his end, eyther for blisse or woe?
A09103	For who can be said to hope for that which he is certayn to haue?
A09103	For who euer wrote this before?
A09103	For who knoweth not, that Iesuites and Dominicans are two different Religious Orders?
A09103	For who saith, that a man doubteth of his iustice or righteousnes?
A09103	For who will say that the Popes Breue prohibits swearing against an vsurping deposer?
A09103	For why could he not here haue set downe the words of his Author?
A09103	For why, or how doth this doctour deny heere the other two articles of true Catholick doctrine?
A09103	From what heauen is he fallen?
A09103	Furthermore, if it be impossible for any Catholicke to beare true allegiance in his hart, what is his Maiestie like to gaine by vrging them to sweare?
A09103	Had it not bene inough for him to say, I will remember thy righteousnes?
A09103	Had it not bene more plaine dealing to haue alleaged some one sentence, or conclusion contradictory to the other?
A09103	Hath he a generall licence, to take away or adde what he listeth to his Authors words?
A09103	Hath he any testimonies of authors that auow the contrary, and affirme that they were not true?
A09103	Hath he euer seene any sheep in this deliberation?
A09103	Haue they no conscience?
A09103	He answereth; Can an oath be kept which was not first taken?
A09103	He denyeth him to be borne in Greece?
A09103	He denyeth him to be of an exellent wit?
A09103	His contempt of the world seene by his life, and conuersation?
A09103	Hovv art thou made an harlot, thou faithfull Citty, that wert once full of iudgement, and iustice dwelled therin, but now murtherers?
A09103	How can this iarre be excused by you?
A09103	How could I forbear ●, or who can blame me?
A09103	How did he find it?
A09103	How doth he reply?
A09103	How is his voyce contrary to the voyce& sense of all the rest?
A09103	How many fifty yeares are passed since that cradle was rockt?
A09103	How many scholle ● s and disciples were he like to haue th ● rin?
A09103	How many, and how grosse lyes haue bene detected?
A09103	How proueth he this?
A09103	How say you to the plots of France, Flanders, and Scotland, and other parts, do they conuince, that no Protesta ● t can be trusty?
A09103	How then doe I beg the question, when I do euince it by proofe?
A09103	How then doth the Apologer so grossely forget, and contradict himselfe, euen then, when he goeth about to proue contradictions in his Aduersary?
A09103	How then may these thinges violently induce any man to beleiue, that Po ● e Innocentius did conspire the poysoning of Fredericke?
A09103	How would they exaggerate such an aduantage?
A09103	I will demaund( saith he) of this Iesuit: first, whether ● his be not a Paganish delusion of God and men?
A09103	If all Authors stād for you, why do you corrupt their words, peruert their meaning?
A09103	If the controuersy y ● ● handle belong to fayth, or good life, what needeth so fraudulēt, so faithles,& persidious dealing?
A09103	If the true Church did perish, from whence is Donatus come vnto vs?
A09103	If they may not, wh ● re then is their c ● nfid ● nce?
A09103	If they may, why doth he ● al it incertitudinē iustitiae nostrae, the vncertainty of o ● ● righteousnes?
A09103	In what law of modesty doth this lye, to affirme such things?
A09103	In which case S. Augustine writing against the Donatists, saith thus: Si peri ● t Ecclesia, vnde ergo Donatus apparuit?
A09103	Is euery thing that is re ● used, refused freely without coaction?
A09103	Is he f ● t to haue care of soules, that seemeth to haue no soule himselfe, or care what becommeth of other mens soules?
A09103	Is he fit to be a Kings Chāpion in writing?
A09103	Is he so wary of not putting Kings and Princes in feare& iealousie of their thrones as you call them?
A09103	Is here now any contradiction?
A09103	Is it lawfull for euery man to deuise, add, alter, cut of, or disguise what he wil without controlment?
A09103	Is it not a shame to roue so farre from the marke, and to falsify the plaine meaning of Authors, and writers in this sort?
A09103	Is it not absurd, and ridiculous to call this skill of Logicke?
A09103	Is it not to shew that Innocentius the 4. hired one to poyson Fredericke?
A09103	Is it not whether the swearer doth make promise to belieue, or not to belieue any article of religion, in taking the Oath?
A09103	Is it perhaps, for that they are strange, and not according to mans reason or vse of things that fall out ordinarily in the world?
A09103	Is it saep ● fallax, sēper inc ● rta?
A09103	Is it so Syr?
A09103	Is not his hate of ambition, honour, and wealth discouered by his voluntary pouerty?
A09103	Is not the forswearing of any one poynt of Catholike Religion sufficient to stay the cōscience of a Catholike man from swearing?
A09103	Is not then the false Prelate worthie for euer to be discredited?
A09103	Is not this Christian and charitable proceeding?
A09103	Is not this felicity?
A09103	Is not this fine?
A09103	Is not this plaine inough?
A09103	Is not this playne inough?
A09103	Is not this very confidētly spoken thinke you?
A09103	Is nothing promised in those words to be belieued, or not belieued?
A09103	Is the exacting of the Oath( saith he) a scandall actiue in our Magistrates?
A09103	Is the exacting of this Oath a scandall actiue in our Magistrates?
A09103	Is the vse of this Canon more amongst Catholikes or Protestants?
A09103	Is there any least similitude of these things against the Catholicks of England?
A09103	Is there any sense in this?
A09103	Is there any shame in these men?
A09103	Is there no difference?
A09103	Is there no law of truth or sincerity?
A09103	Is there not a wise man among you?
A09103	Is this a sufficient proofe that Pagan phrases concerning matters of religion may be vsed also in our Diuinity?
A09103	Is this dealing Episcopall, or not rather Diabolicall by such lying and forged fictions to do so open iniury to others?
A09103	Is this our owne Syr?
A09103	Is this plaine dealing?
A09103	Is this the liberty of Ghospellers?
A09103	Is this the profund ● tie of Sathan?
A09103	Iulian changed his religion, but our King not?
A09103	Let it be counted felicity, but it is left- handed felicity: what is left- handed felicity?
A09103	M ● Barlow demaundeth of me, in what sense I take the word Catholike, when I suppose the Roman Church to be the Catholicke Church?
A09103	May not any man proue Quidlibet ex Quolibet by this your manner of reasoning, in which you say what you li ● t, and proue nothing at all?
A09103	May not then, saith he, a Prince iudge in cases of Religion and Faith?
A09103	Might not Beares as soone be brought to the stake, as these men againe to their Monasteries to do penance?
A09103	Moreouer I would demaund, if she once perished how could she be raised to life againe?
A09103	N ● mq ● ● ● 〈 ◊ 〉 omnes porta Inferi?
A09103	No Syr?
A09103	No commiseration?
A09103	No compassion?
A09103	No, but solius prorsus, it alone, altogeather I will remember: why so?
A09103	Now what bringeth Maister Barlow to ouerthrow this doctrine?
A09103	Now what reply thinke you maketh M. Barlow?
A09103	O ● whether th ● re be any clauses in it against Catholicke Religion?
A09103	Of wicked life, or of false doctrine?
A09103	Or can M. Barlow conceaue that they haue one name without all vnity?
A09103	Or did Petrus de Vineis write any history?
A09103	Or did he vnderstand it?
A09103	Or do the Puritans in denying and impugning this, impugne but a ceremony, and no poynt of Religion it selfe?
A09103	Or doth he not teach any such thing in this chapter?
A09103	Or doth his Holines seeke fame by learning, or in secret, when he determineth any matter?
A09103	Or how will M. Barlow measure the same by inches or e ● ls, by feet or fathoms?
A09103	Or in what forme is this argument?
A09103	Or is his throne lesse or more weake thē theirs?
A09103	Or is the mentioning of Kings in generall a sufficient inference, that I meane of his Maiestie in particuler?
A09103	Or is your cause become now so desperate, as that the weaknes and wickednes therof, enforceth you to these hard shifts, and disgracefull attempts?
A09103	Or rather was i ● not more fraudulent in M. Barlow, not to tell his reader, that it was twice put downe, though once left out?
A09103	Or shall it be but likely only, and probable, that the old Testament is true, for that it was only supposed, and not proued at the beginning?
A09103	Or that he may not as well be condemned, for his too much slacknes, as for his ouer much ha ● t?
A09103	Or that if he had offered him an Oath repugnant to his Religion and conscience in those matters, he would haue obeyed; and acknowledged his authority?
A09103	Or was it perhaps for that the Doctour said that the whole Oath as it lay, was vnlaw ● ull?
A09103	Or was this Councel bound to submit it selfe, in these points of faith and religion, vnto that Emperour, as M. Barlows former doctrine inferreth?
A09103	Or was this Psalme well chosen by M. Barlow for his purpose of flattering Kinges and Princes, in respect of Gods warynes in his speaches?
A09103	Or were these Chayrs or Oracles so earnest before the Pope in his defence?
A09103	Or what Catholike will say that his refusall of swearing is against such a one, and not rather against the authority of his lawfull Pastour?
A09103	Or what kind of consecration do they vse therein?
A09103	Or when vpon the way an ho ● tler deuideth a p ● ● ke o ● oates to three ho ● ses, what skil of Logicke is required to that diuision?
A09103	Or where did you frame your cons ● ience?
A09103	Or whether there be any clauses in it against Catholicke Religion?
A09103	Or who giueth authority of iudgement to that Church, if the supreme Head and gouernour haue it not in himself?
A09103	Or who was euer accounted a Martyr in the Church of God, for refusing to deliuer vp ● Heathen Poet, or Philosophers booke?
A09103	Or why doth he so resolutely affirme that for certaine, which Vrspergensis, otherwise imprudēt inough, doth but only relate vpon heare- say?
A09103	Or why is this submission made?
A09103	Or will M. Barlowes profound diuinity teach vs, that in the selfe same mysterious actions, one part is subiect to Gods Prouidence, and the other not?
A09103	Or will he call them pro ● unda Sathanae, the profound mysteries of Sathan and iniquity?
A09103	Or would his Maiesty haue taken the same, in as good part, as Valentiniā did?
A09103	Our Colleges?
A09103	Our Seminaries?
A09103	Our Vniue ● sities for bringing vp, and instructing Priests?
A09103	Out of what groūd is he sprong?
A09103	Out of what sea hath he peept?
A09103	Out of which discourse, what trow yo ● doth M. Barlow infer?
A09103	Pope Innocentius actes, saith M. Barlow, could be no longer hid: descried they were& c. what were these acts I pray you?
A09103	Shall he be bound to read all Bellarmines fiue bookes, to see whether it be true or no?
A09103	Sit licèt: sed sinistra: quid est sinistra?
A09103	So he and who can deny ● but that here is also besmearing as M. Barlow hath framed his Cōmētary?
A09103	So that Peter we know, and Paul we know to be singular D ● uines; but who is this?
A09103	Speake in sooth, honest censurer( saith he) is vnity of names Hardings owne distinction in answere to Bishop Iewel ●?
A09103	Th ● se were my words, what cauill hath M. Barlow against them?
A09103	That if the illegitimation had bin in her bloud, no law could make it good?
A09103	That is, By the Sōnes procuremēt,( at whose hands but the Popes?
A09103	That it was commited before her knowledge?
A09103	The Bishops?
A09103	The Embassadours also of the King presently following, resisted him to his face before the Pope) that he sent Chaires or Oracles to Rome?
A09103	The Puritan Doctors?
A09103	The Sonne of such a Mother, as held her selfe much beholden to English Catholicks?
A09103	The holy Patri ● ● ches had good part therof, and shall we not call it felicity?
A09103	The other also that kneeleth and prayeth in the corners of streetes, whose conscience doth he iudge, or condemne?
A09103	The second is in his second interrogation, what needed any procurement by himselfe to himself?
A09103	The second thus: Doth he that taketh it, promise to belieue, or not to belieue any article of Religion?
A09103	The third fallacy is in his other demaund, to whom could not the Bishop of Liege be reconciled, but to the Pope?
A09103	The title of S. Thomas h ● s Article is, VV ● ether Christians b ● 〈 ◊ 〉 to obey secular Powers, or not?
A09103	Then cōming to the matter, he demaundeth this question: Suppose it were not exactly translated, is not the sense all one?
A09103	This I say is the first Notandum: for if these things be indifferent, what need so much a doe about them?
A09103	This is as wise as the former: for I would faine know of M. Barlow, how there can be inc ● rti ● udo rei, vnles it be de futuris contingentibus?
A09103	Thus I said:& doth not Bellarmine allow this doctrine?
A09103	Thus the Cardinall ● Now let vs see what Syr William doth bring to impugne this doctrine, and to proue it contradictory?
A09103	To all this, what sayth M. Barlow?
A09103	To take any Oath that the Emperour Charles should propose vnto them?
A09103	To this what replyeth M. Barlow?
A09103	To what straites is M. Barlow driuen here?
A09103	To whome?
A09103	VVHETHER COVNCELS HAVE SVBMITTED THEMSELVES VNTO CHRISTIAN EMPERORS in Spi ● ituall affayres: and namely that of Arles to Charles the Great?
A09103	VVHETHER THE FOVRTH COVNCELL OF TOLEDO Did prescribe any such set forme of Oath to be exhibited to the Subiects, as is affirmed in the Apology?
A09103	VVHETHER THE POPE IN HIS BREVE DID FORBID TEMPORALL OBEDIENCE to his Maiesty of England?
A09103	VVas the act of cutting o ● the head of Queene Mary of Scotland a wicked act?
A09103	VVhat are you?
A09103	VVhat ignorance then is there in this Minister, so to write and triumph vpon lyes?
A09103	VVhat is this to the purpose?
A09103	VVhat is this( will he say) to the Popes consent for his POISONING?
A09103	VVhat of all this is seene in my Preface?
A09103	VVhat sayth our Doctour to this dilemma?
A09103	VVhere then are his labours?
A09103	VVill he not be ashamed to brag of Logike hearafter?
A09103	VVill they not s ● y when they haue the ● ● ip in their hands, as S. Peter said to his Maister, Parce tibi: be good to your sel ● e Syr?
A09103	VVould M. Barlow haue called it so in Queene Elizabeths dayes?
A09103	VVould he haue spoken so in his Saint Queenes life time?
A09103	WHETHER THE DENYING Of taking this New Oath doe include the deniall of all the particuler clauses contayned therin?
A09103	WHETHER THE OATH BE ONLY OF CIVILL OBEDIENCE?
A09103	Was almighty God wary in these speaches?
A09103	Was it for that they held him for their supreme Gouernour in all causes Ecclesiastiacll, and temporall?
A09103	Was it in her bones, or in her flesh, or skinne?
A09103	Was it the Protestant Church?
A09103	Was it whether there were euer any oath of Allegiance to temporall Princes allowed, or taken in the Christian world before this of ours?
A09103	Was there euer the like dealing or māner of answering, to out- face a man, against his owne words, proofs, and protestations?
A09103	Was there freedome in that choice?
A09103	Was this a wary and respect ● ue speach to so great a King, and Monarch?
A09103	Was this also the slip of the Printer?
A09103	We say first, that this is nothing to the purpose, noe more then, VVhich is the way to London?
A09103	Well Syr, and what will you infer of these two propositions?
A09103	Well Syr, and who I pray you were they?
A09103	Well then, this vncertainty being of the person, what saith he thereunto?
A09103	Well then, what saith M. Barlow to this conclusion?
A09103	Were not this a bad kind of arguing?
A09103	Were they these which you huddle togeather for strong presumptions, and vehementinducements, to proue that he would haue poisoned the Emperour?
A09103	Wh ● t was Nero?
A09103	What Author besides himselfe doth auerre it, in this manner, as he doth?
A09103	What Byshops were they?
A09103	What Vessels haue they consecrated thinke you?
A09103	What a Prelate is this ● or men to hang their soules vpon the truth of his words?
A09103	What answereth M. Barlow?
A09103	What can M. Ba ● low mislike in this?
A09103	What can be more ignorantly spoken then this, concerning the comparison of conclusions, and suppositions?
A09103	What can be spoken more seuerely to Princes then all this?
A09103	What coherence is there in this?
A09103	What contradiction of Corah and Dathan is there in them, that offer all obedience, and duty both to tēporall& spirituall Gouernours?
A09103	What demonstration was this?
A09103	What doth the matter appertayne to vs ● do we esteeme so litle a false Oath?
A09103	What feare of God or shame of the world is there here?
A09103	What if neither these words no ● the sense of them, be to be found in Matthew Paris( as indeed they are not) nor yet in any Author besides?
A09103	What is height of pryde and folly, if this be not?
A09103	What is that, which by these violent inducementes, as you terme them, you go now about to proue?
A09103	What is this( will he say) to t ● e Popes consent for his poysoning?
A09103	What malice is this in M. Barlow to report so sham ● ull an vntruth?
A09103	What man of sense will say this, but M. Barlow?
A09103	What may not be proued by Scriptures, where such application is allowed?
A09103	What meane our Schooles?
A09103	What misery is this of your cause to be driu ● n to these shiftes?
A09103	What more blind ignorance, and malicious dealing can be imagined then this?
A09103	What mourning garmentes were there seene throughout the whole Court, for this fact?
A09103	What need that expresse negatiue, if they were all one?
A09103	What new Articles are then here added to the Nycen Creed?
A09103	What orders had they?
A09103	What playne dealing is there in this?
A09103	What proofes are there for the one, more then for the other?
A09103	What replyeth M. Barlow to this?
A09103	What saist thou, o body of Christ?
A09103	What saith M. Barlow hereunto?
A09103	What say you then to the refusall of Eleazar in the Machabees, that refused with losse of life to eate swines- flesh?
A09103	What say you to the former answer made; to wit, that Iuli ● n was an Apostata, but our Soueraigne is a Christian?
A09103	What sayth M. Barlo ● to this?
A09103	What sequele or consequence is this?
A09103	What should Catholikes do?
A09103	What signe of sorrow, and publick affl ● ction?
A09103	What speach can be free from calumination, when such Sicophancy is vsed?
A09103	What still nothing but lying M. Barlow?
A09103	What then are th ● se great matters with which Innocentius is to be charged?
A09103	What then doth this make against me?
A09103	What then shall we say to this ground, or rather to this strong foundation,& inuincible bulwarke?
A09103	What then will you say was his meaning in those words, quae palea est, at Ecclesia pro grano habe ●?
A09103	What then?
A09103	What then?
A09103	What vanity hath their mouth spoken?
A09103	What was Diocles ● ● ●?
A09103	What were this to the purpose?
A09103	What will M. B ● ● low answere to all this?
A09103	What will he say of that crucifying our members, wherof the same Apostle speaketh?
A09103	What would he haue done, or said, if he had bene pressed with an Oath against his Conscience, or any least poynt of his Religion?
A09103	What would he haue said in greater matters?
A09103	What wresting, what forging is this?
A09103	What?
A09103	When or wherin then shall we find M. Barlow to deale pūctually, and sincerely?
A09103	Where I pray you was there any error at all?
A09103	Where did you learne your Logicke?
A09103	Where doth he mention these secret letters to the Patriarch?
A09103	Where is the Cloud of VVitnesses that should proue this?
A09103	Where shal I be safe& c?
A09103	Wherefore after foure hundred years, dost thou go about to teach vs that which before we knew not?
A09103	Wherein here standeth the contradiction?
A09103	Wherein then I pray you was this illegitimation?
A09103	Whereunto he answereth heere by a certayne demaund, in a parenthesis, VVho cast them out( to wit those of Liege) but the Pope?
A09103	Wherfore then doe I reprehend them?
A09103	Wherin did it consist?
A09103	Wherin hath the Apostle branded them?
A09103	Wherin then, or why are they said to haue submitted themselues?
A09103	Wherin then, or why is this submission, or rather r ● mission to the Emperour, and his iudgment?
A09103	Whether Councells haue submitted themselues vnto Christian Emperors in Spirituall affayres: and namely, that of Arles to Charles the great?
A09103	Whether a scandall passiue may fall euen vpon such men as are perfect?
A09103	Whether he that taketh the oath, do promise to belieue, or not to belieue, any article of Religion?
A09103	Whether the O ● th be only of ciuill obedience?
A09103	Whether the Pope in his Breue did forbid temporall Obedience to his Maiesty of England?
A09103	Whether the denying of taking this New Oath, do include the deniall of all the particul ● r clauses contayned therin?
A09103	Whether the deuising& vrging of this new Oath were a blessing or no, eyther to the Receauers or Vrgers?
A09103	Whether the fourth Councell of Toledo did prescribe any such set forme of Oath to be exhibited to the Subiects, as is affirmed in the Apology?
A09103	Which of these two M. Iewell wil you beleeue?
A09103	Which words being most plaine, who but an ignorant man, or most malicious, would translate Responsali, as from hi ● Chayre and Oracle?
A09103	Who euer heard wise man before draw an argument to proue one to be faulty for that he wrot in his owne defence?
A09103	Who gaue him his Iurisdiction?
A09103	Who imposed hands vpon him?
A09103	Who knoweth not, sayth he, that this word Only, doth not so much signify an hypocoristicall alleuiation, as a compendiary limitation?
A09103	Who seeth not the iniustice of this manner of dealing?
A09103	Who then should iudge, or giue sentence?
A09103	Who will not confesse this to be true?
A09103	Who would expect such monstrous doctrines, from the Chayre of a Prelate?
A09103	Who would write so absurdly, but M. Barlow, who seemeth not to vnderstand what he writeth?
A09103	Whom shall I trust?
A09103	Why did he alter them, and not recite them as I set them downe?
A09103	Why doth M. Barlow confine the matter to these Martyrs, that were deceased& shrined in those places of Germany, where the Emperours body lay?
A09103	Why doth he so closely couer& mince the narration, by telling vs a part, and not the whole, as it lyeth in the Author?
A09103	Why had he not tould vs plainely, what he findeth in him, concerning the credit o ● this his relation?
A09103	Why is God afrayd of them?
A09103	Why should M. Barlow leaue out the words( as it is said) and yet infer a certainty vpon his words?
A09103	Why should he vse such nipping& paring in his allegations, but that Iuglers must not be seene in all their knacks?
A09103	Why then doe Catholickes stand so much in England against the receiuing of this Oath?
A09103	Why then had he not decided the question as became a learned man, and a Prelate indeed?
A09103	Why then is this Canon brought in against vs?
A09103	Will M. Barlow confesse that his Church agreeth in this?
A09103	Will M. Barlow heere compare these two distinctions to Sedecias his two hornes?
A09103	Will M. Barlow say, that he sent two Chayres, or Oracles?
A09103	Will Protestants acknowledg this in their Creed?
A09103	Will euer Catholicke writer be found that dealeth so with authors?
A09103	Will he not blush at this vnhonest dealing herein?
A09103	Will he not blush, and be ashamed of this shameles calumniation, or rather forgery?
A09103	Will he refuse it?
A09103	Will he say perhaps of the Gentills?
A09103	Will he sweare it to be true?
A09103	Will their brethren the Protestants of France allow of this argument?
A09103	Will they acknowledge the Kings Supreme authority in causes Ecclesiasticall, as King Henry did challenge it?
A09103	With what face then can M. Barlow accuse me of the quite contrary, and so reuile against me for the same?
A09103	Would M. Barlow haue Christian men to sweare,& swallow vp a bundle of word ● knit togeather, without opening and looking into the ●?
A09103	Would no one of them set it downe in their writings, or so much as make mention therof?
A09103	Yea, with what conscience can he say, that this reuelation may be an illusion?
A09103	Yf it be the truth you seeke, why vse you so many and so manifest lyes?
A09103	You aske also whether the Catholiks be no better instructed in Deuinity by their Priests?
A09103	You will demaund then, what is S. Paul his meaning, when he saith, as here M. Barlow relateth him, that an Oath is the end of all controuersies?
A09103	You will not, I trust, fall to the same absurdity of seeking dissimilitudes, that are from the point of the comparison it self?
A09103	a ● candalum ● candalum Magnatum?
A09103	aboundance of almes?
A09103	all manner of ordinance?
A09103	among al the Priests secular& ● esuited in Englād, that can determine a controuersy about the Oath of Allegiance?
A09103	an oppressor and an Idolatour?
A09103	and countenanced by two Cardinals, Cai ● tan and Burghesius be sufficient?
A09103	and had they no validity?
A09103	and in respect of Kings a license for disloyalty in their subiects, and their allumetts of treason to their ● ersons?
A09103	and that he had in expresse tearmes abused his Maiesty, with the charge of offering ● buse to the Pope?
A09103	and that in a time of Infidell Princes, as was that of S. Peter, who might, and did ordaine many thinges against the Lord?
A09103	and where haue you lurked so long?
A09103	and why then did you euen now deny it?
A09103	and willeth them inclusiuely to deny the Trinity?
A09103	and without limitation at all?
A09103	and yet, had he not sufficient time to deliberate?
A09103	aut quem?
A09103	by Diuinity or Philosophy?
A09103	did he euer heare her Confession?
A09103	doe not these words well beseem& adorne an English stile?
A09103	doe you heare him say now, that in deed her dea ● h was a misery to the whol ● land?
A09103	doe you heare him tell vs, that the blot thereo ● is indele ● le?
A09103	doth it appertaine any thing to our purpose?
A09103	for what needed any procurement by himselfe to himselfe?)
A09103	from all publike taxes,& labour, to the end they may attend to se ● ue God more freely?
A09103	he became an Ethnicke, but our King is not ashamed of his profession, and other such like differences?
A09103	he denyeth him to be skilfull in the Greek tongue& c?
A09103	his Commentaryes?
A09103	his Epistles Theologicall?
A09103	his Iudiciall Decis ● ● s?
A09103	his Sermons?
A09103	his Treatises?
A09103	his doctrinall determinations?
A09103	is here no menacing extrusion threatned to Princes whē they are threatned to be crushed like a potters vessell?
A09103	is it in the abstract, because there is an Oath commanded?
A09103	is it not a shame for a Doctor to wander vp& down from the purp ● s ● e?
A09103	is not Recusancy a case of conscience?
A09103	is not he worthy to pretend a Bishopricke, that hath no more wit then this?
A09103	not among Catholiks?
A09103	o members of our Sauiour, you that are Children of God, and not aliens, what say you?
A09103	or Catholickes in England should take the Oath for auoyding the penaltyes of the Statute?
A09103	or account to be giuen of such en ● rmous slaunders, especially touching bloud?
A09103	or any such Philosophy taught before, or Diuinity?
A09103	or did the very refusall argue, as there is said, that he had liberty of choice, and therupon disloyalty of affection?
A09103	or doth he answere one word to the plaine testimony of Scriptures, alleadged out of Toby, Iob, and S. Paul for proofe therof, all cyted by me?
A09103	or doth he vse the tearmes of vndeuinelike doctrine?
A09103	or how farre extends it?
A09103	or how m ● y they settle it?
A09103	or is not this rather profound ignorance and absurdity in you to say so?
A09103	or to exprobrate the want thereof vnto me?
A09103	or what sense of grammer, or coherence of phrase would those latyn wordes make, for so much as I wrot in English?
A09103	or whereof doth this consequence sauour but of folly only and malice?
A09103	or will he teach this magisteriall doctrine o courtesy to be practised in the Court at this day?
A09103	q ● id de ● ique iste ● qui ● oc tempore ● ● ● lesiam persequitur?
A09103	quid Dioclesi ● ● ● s?
A09103	refusall of dignities,& temporall commodities?
A09103	so blasphemous, as to auou ● h the same?
A09103	so pretended, so printed so published, so diuulged to the world?
A09103	the Bishop could not be reconciled( to whom but to the Pope, who had accursed both Church and Churchmen at Liege, for burying the Emperour?)
A09103	to beat men with ● ● uo ● s to take the Oath?
A09103	to wit, that shee must fly, when shee seeth the wolfe?
A09103	vbi tam diu latuistis?
A09103	vnde,& quando venistis?
A09103	what chopping, what changing what mistaking is there heere?
A09103	what haue we to doe with thee?
A09103	what if he neuer knew of any such attempt, nor beleiued, that there were any such really designed?
A09103	what is he who at this time, doth persecute the Church?
A09103	what shal be done to him that knetcheth this opprobrious Curr?
A09103	what shall I say?
A09103	when did euer the iudgment of the Church take authority from the Emperour?)
A09103	whence, and when came you?
A09103	whether there be free election giuen in taking the Oath, or n ●?
A09103	whether this choice, I say, be absolutely free, or no?
A09103	who can say so but vpon ignorance, or malice?
A09103	who knoweth not, that the fayrest title is put vpon the fowlest matter, when it is ● o be perswaded or ● xacted?
A09103	who seeth not, that there is nothing heere but trifling, and caueling?
A09103	why 〈 ◊ 〉 Re ● usantes punished, and fined for Recusancy, though they take the Oath o ● Allegiance?
A09103	wil not his friends blush for him in this behalfe?
A09103	yea how doth he cite S. Thomas for that which so plainly 〈 ◊ 〉 gainsaieth and refuteth?
A09103	● or here he nameth both: and if Salomon found it by Diuinity, what needed M. Barlow to add that he was no meane Philosopher?