Questions

This is a list of all the questions and their associated study carrel identifiers. One can learn a lot of the "aboutness" of a text simply by reading the questions.

identifier question
A30357],[ London?
A28243For, Who would set the Bryars and Thorns against me in Battail?
A29382For who should strengthen the Peoples hearts, and defend the Cause of the LORD against them, if such a Ministry were down?
A30550: 1659?]
A30550s.n.,[ London?
A31684Would ye know what he was or did in those days when there was no King in Israel?
A33899If we have sow ● unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing, if we shall reap your carnal things?
A28824His 3 Articles of Explanation, he might have spar''d: For who, that hand not a mind to be troublesome, would stumble at such Straws?
A28824What true lover of his King and Country will think that word too hard for so black a Villany?
A34188And if it be asked, Why then have ye such scandalous Priests?
A34188I answer with another Question, Why then have ye such scandalous Maintainance in many places?
A34188What if we have His Royal Word never so solemnly passed?
A45405Concerning the former, I offer to consideration, First, whether the Government of the Church be not a considerable part of Religion?
A43547But what was done by them at last?
A43547Perused and Explained; by whom?
A43547Well, what did they being thus assembled?
A14241For is not Excommunication a maine part of Ecclesiasticall government, and Forest lawes a speciall branch of causes Temporall?
A14241For must not Heresie( for example) bee acknowledged to be a cause meerly spirituall or Ecclesiasticall?
A14241and yet by what power is an Hereticke put to death?
A30325: 1688?]
A30325s.n.,[ Amsterdam?
A48829And from that time forward you that were always all deem''d Cavaliers where were you?
A48829In all those weak efforts of gasping Loyalty what did you?
A29572And after all my Lords, how few do the sharp trials, and tests of this Act regard?
A29572Mr. Speaker, when David was put to his choice of one of the three extream Calamities he made election of the Plague, and why?
A26737How the onely?
A48232How did it necessitate the King to Prorogue and Adjourn, yea, and Dissolve Parliaments from time to time?
A48232In this Hurly Burly what a Confusion did it bring the Kingdom into?
A48232Now in the name of Machiavel where are we going next?
A48232and what can preserve them, but the Love of their Subjects, and governing according to the Laws they have made, and are oblig''d to maintain?
A54230But, pray, Who is it that should punish them for that Offence?
A54230Why should we therfore make that the ground of an Exclusion?
A34790An si hoc dicam non vel uno hoc nomine dignus videar cui& in Patriam reditus& ad vos aditus detur?
A34790Quid ita ejus ne pulsantis sonum an vocantis vocem non audierunt, qui intus sunt?
A34790Tu vero, Rex, si quaeras, ut solent qui suas fores pulsare audiunt, quisnam pulset?
A34790or should be granted to Philip and Mary, and by their means to the possessors?
A41557how many were tortured without Mercy?
A39350If any men should say what Impudence is this?
A39350Is not such a Proposal Contrary to the Present Government?
A39350if it shall be said what signifies an Oath to a Papist& c.?
A56021And is not this a time for it?
A56021Is not this the time?
A56021Since we are Brethren, why do we not, as becomes Brethren, dwell together in unity?
A56021When can healing- endeavours be more in season?
A56021When can you find a fitter?
A56021what is done in order to a Cure?
A30329Did not the Judges in every Circuit, and the Favourite Justices of Peace in every Sessions, imploy all their Eloquence on this Subject?
A30329For what is it that these men would thank the King?
A30329I must also ask our Author, in what point of Fidelity has our Church failed so far, as to make her forfeit her Title to His Majesties Promises?
A30329Were not all the Orders for the late Severity sent from thence?
A30552But how should people be setled in Religion?
A30552But now tell me, can this religion be setled, or any Nation or people or any person in it, by any external power or outward authority of men?
A30552But what are peoples, and the Nations yet to settle in religion?
A30552and have you done no good this many years by your preaching, that Religion is yet to settle?
A30552and is religion unsetled yet, that you are craving Lawes made by men to settle religion?
A30552or can the Laws of Kings or Parliaments settle such Religion, or make people truly religious, or establish a Nation or people, in this Religion?
A30552what have you preached for this many years?
A30552what, have your preaching been all in vaine?
A59624],[ London?
A59624or upon what pretence of Reason, could this Arch- Bishop require, that from others, which he hath so little care or skill to do himself?
A46958As when, for Example?
A46958Hic autem quaeritur, utrùm Armis reprimendi sunt Tyranni, praecipientes ut faciamus contra mandata Dei?
A46958Is any one Impowered by the Laws to invade the Laws?]
A46958Think you their Laws permit them to Rebel?
A46958To Invade the Established Religion and Rights of the Kingdom?
A46958[ Quaere, Who has Authority to Invade the Established Religion and Rights of the Nation?
A46958[ To do what?
A41285And what do they call misbehaviour in the Church?
A41285Besides if their power bee dependent, of whom is it dependent?
A41285In like manner what doe they call obstinate inconformity?
A41285What liberty is left to us as men?
A41285],[ London?
A47973And is it fair for them to be the first that Quarrel, who are the first who receive the Benefit of the Application?
A47973And what have I to do to judge them that are without?
A47973And who art thou that judgest another mans servant?
A47973Or are they willing to undergo the same Severities again, till at length they are Outed out of All?
A47973Thus in cases of Idolatry and Oppression, the Prophets did address themselves directly to the Rulers of the people?
A47973What is the chaff to the wheat, saith the Lord?
A47971: 169-?]
A47971Are not then our Judges, our Juries, our Fleets, and our Armies, guilty of Murther, in opposing King James''s Return?
A47971Do n''t your Queen list so many Assassins, whilst she Commissions them for that pu ● p ● se?
A47971Is it not as unlawful to steal a Crown as a Trifle?
A47971Really, Sir, if there be any Truth, if there be any Virtue, if there be any Religion, What shall we say to these Things?
A47971What will you say to them?
A47971s.n.,[ London?
A33237Are not all Ecclesiastical Promotions in our Power, and Occupation?
A33237Are we not Establisht by the Law of the Land, whereas others will at most be only Suffered?
A33237Have we not Truth on our Side, the only Invincible Champion of Religion?
A33237Is not this that very Thing, wherewith formerly we have so often reproacht our Adversaryes?
A33237What can be more contrary to the Honour, and Dignity of True Religion, than that it should appear to stand in need of Force to draw Men to it?
A33237s.n.,[ London: 1660?]
A42491Who will not learn, yea, covet to want, as well as to abound, from these great Examples?
A42491Yea, Dominis?
A42491what Iliades of Miseries, what Storms of Violence, what Deluges of Mischief, what Oceans of Confusion, followed in Church and State?
A42491which are capable to render Indigence it self venerable, Poverty desirable, and Affliction lovely?
A41189And what a mischief was it to the Liberty- Keepers of England, to send for Gentlemen into Custody, by no other Warrant, but from Will, Will?
A41189Are all our Plots and Intrigues sham''d into a Sigh?
A41189But do you really design to enthrone your D. of M. and ever trust that Lord of the Sun Tavern with the Chariot and Ranies of Government?
A41189But how did you resent the Remove to Oxford?
A41189But what think you of sending the D. of Y. into Scotland?
A41189How stand our Affairs in England?
A41189I wish it may be onely a Phantom, but what would you do if it should prove a Reality?
A41189Is your Tripos himself deceiv''d?
A41189What think you of the Condition of Tangier?
A41189What?
A41189— Come, what cheer now?
A41189— What''s the matter?
A64568Speech in Parliament June 1641, concerning deanes Thomas, William, Sir, d. 1653?
A64568Speech in Parliament June 1641, concerning deanes Thomas, William, Sir, d. 1653?
A320394 Mr. Calamy said, what have I done worthy of imprisonment?
A32039And when they had called them before them, they asked them by what Power, or in what Name have you done this?
A32039Behold how he seeketh a quarrel against me?
A32039I wonder what he preached?
A32039Mr. Calamy, What mean you to weep, and to break mine heart?
A32039What, will you endanger the publick peace rather then be restrained?
A32039shall a novel fancy bear down an Apostolical institution?
A32039shall a private opinion contest with a publick Law?
A32039shall the minor part impose upon the major?
A32039what would you do if you had power in your own hands, that are so bold without it?
A32039will you not scruple at Rebellion, who scruple at a few ceremonies?
A61083And if Heresies stir up their Patrons against the State, the Magistrate beares not the Sword in vaine?
A61083And what if the Prince of Persia withstand for a while?
A61083I. BVt the Temple was builded with all speed in Nehemiahs time; and therefore,& c. And Haggai cals to the building, Is it time?
A40101And will the highest Asserters of Passive- Obedience, affirm it to be due from Those, who are under no Obligation of Allegiance?
A40101I Reply, First, Why then did not themselves stand by KING Iames?
A40101Now, What was this but a plain Conquest?
A40101Suppose there were Hazard in the Case, ought that to Discourage the Ministers of Jesus Christ from the Performance of a necessary Duty?
A40101Why did themselves so silently Look on, and see HIM Conquered?
A40101Why did they not at least mind their People of their Duty, and on Pain of Damnation Excite them to it?
A49360And must you to Revile us and seek to Root us out: because we are not Protestants according to your standard?
A49360And yet must their Hearers and Followers be branded with the Ignominious Names of Half Protestants, Church Papists, and Protestants in Masquerade?
A49360For pray observe, With what heat and earnestness did some press the Subscription of it upon others their fellow subjects?
A49360How passionately and bitterly did many in Coffee- Houses and other places debate and argue the lawfulness and unlawfulness of it?
A49360What doth the Jesuit and Papists hate us, and plot to destroy us, because he finds us the best and truest Protestants?
A49360What need have the Papists of Collections from their friends?
A49360With what Reluctancy and stubbornness did others deny and refuse it?
A49360or moneys from the Holy Chamber?
A49360or of Armyes from Foreign Popish Princes?
A17962And is this a Religion fit to keepe subiects in obedience to their Soueraignes?
A17962And since his time what is become of the Court of augmentation?
A17962And what bond of obedience can there be in such religion?
A17962And what is the libertie that they haue in stead thereof?
A17962May we be both good subiects, then we are not diuided in the King?
A17962Or shall we thinke that he will not in time reuenge this wrong?
A17962Tyrannie of the Church of Rome, whereby themselues, and their forefathers, had beene kept in awe and obedience vnto God, and their Kings?
A17962What reason is there then, that we should be thus hotly and vnplacably diuided?
A17962what benefit you receiue of all the Church- lands, more then your Progenitors did when they were in the hands of the Clergie?
A44094If not, what can those Words signifie, That the King is over all Persons and in all Causes, as well Ecclesiastical as Civil, Supream?
A44094Who of the Clergy have a divine Commission to judge of the Reasons, and fix the time for it?
A44094Why do n''t they protest against the Power of the Prince to call them; refuse his Writs, and disobey his Summons?
A59475For what is the business of Parliaments but the alteration, either by adding, or taking away some part of the Government, either in Church or State?
A70049: 1681?]
A60651Or would you inclose your selves with Cedars that he may not find you out?
A60651When will you be weary of it you perverse men of Corrupt minds who are after earthly things acting against God and his People for filthy lucre sake?
A60651Would you build your Nests so high that the Lord may not see you?
A508972ly, Are not these honest and good Countrey- men, who think it cruelty to punish such as did take up Arms twice in an open Rebellion?
A50897And what Expression or Limitation can be Treason by this general Clause, if this be not?
A50897And what can be more pernicious, then that Law which is Inconsistent with the Protestant Religion?
A50897And where have we ever heard them resent the injustice done to any Cavaleer, or shew more resentment than in this Earls Case?
A50897And who after this should believe these lying Authors?
A50897Are not they promoters of Arbitrary Government, who think, that the Judges and Magistrats of the Nation, should dispense with such Laws?
A50897Calling and Dissolving of Parliaments, and a Negative Voice in them?
A50897For what is a greater Limitation, than to reserve to himself to be Judge how far he is Tyed?
A50897Or of what use can this general Clause be, if it secure not against such Limitations as this?
A50897Yet what can now be said?
A50897and which Tyes men to Swear things which are Contradictory?
A1757672 p. S.n],[ Holland?
A17576Cum sis confessus, cum sis convictus, habes ne Quo tales noxas occuluisse queas?
A17576Had thou not mind what dangers he Had travelled farre among?
A17576How great a sinne were this to thee, A Pilgrim poore to wrong?
A17576Non advertisti, quod ei per maxima terrae Et pelagi spatia sit peragranda via?
A17576Non advertisti, quod plura pericula passus, Plurima passurus, quod peregrinus erat?
A17576Quomodo ergo reges Domino serviunt in timore, nisi ea qua cōtra jussa Domini fiunt, religiosa severitate prohibendo, a ● que plectendo?
A17576b Quid non evertat consueiudo?
A17576c Hostis Herodes impie, Christum venire quid times?
A17576c Quid litigamus?
A17576or how shall I defye, whom the Lord hath not defyed?
A17576quid non assiduitate duretur?
A17576quid nō usui cedar?
A30395And how could he be overcome that never struggled?
A30395But how could he lose it that never stood to it?
A30395But who of you have ingaged in this contest, that he might raise a Wall for the house of Israel?
A30395By what right then have you conferred that on the King?
A30395Quis ausus est invidiae se offerre?
A30395Quis vestrum in arenam descendit ut opponeret murum pro domo Israel?
A30395Quo jure ergo vos illud in Regem contulistis?
A30395Quod in controversià victi sitis, quod causâ cecideritis, quomodo cecidit qui non stetit?
A30395Quomodo victus est qui non pugnavit?
A30395Who has had the boldness to expose himself to envy?
A30395Who has uttered so much as one word, that savoured of the freedom of former times?
A30395Who of you all did plead this weighty, this just, and this most Sacred Cause, before the King?
A30395and since the holy Canons forbid the alienating the Rights of the Church, how could it enter into your minds to alienate these Rights?
A56409And I think the Fellow had received better Instructions than the Dr. would have given him, who being ask''d who made him?
A56409And over and above, to lay an Embargo, as it were, upon all future Attempts of that kind?
A56409Ay, where are we now?
A56409But to whose Determination will he submit that Point?
A56409Is it not( says he) most reasonable to think that to be the sense of the Law, which learned Judges and Lawyers have agreed is the sense of it?
A56409Well, but what Effect had those Endeavours towards his late Conversion?
A56409What need you be so earnest tho?
A56409Where will he be then?
A44840And hath not this( of late) been the case in these Nations?
A44840Are you not well?
A44840Is there any thing more equal and just then that all men should hire& pay their own Ministers( alias servants?)
A44840May not you be as good, as religious as you will?
A44840Was not this typical?
A44840What else makes the persons called Papists, dangerous in a Common- Wealth, and to dwell among?
A44840Would you not have that liberty, and be so done unto?
A44840and slight, scorn, contemn, hate, and seek to take away the lives of others( differing from them therein) as Hereticks?
A64569Doe I not rather declare my selfe a wel- wisher, if not a firme friend to Episcopacy, desiring onely the cure and preservation thereof?
A46343And as for our Prince, who was ever so exceeding tender of his Honour as He?
A46343And doth not all mankind consent in this, that the King is the fountain of mercy as well as of Justice?
A46343And who in the World can dispute this?
A46343Now, Sir, what Answer can you give to all This?
A46343Shall we suspect him without cause?
A46343They know they have an infinitely wise God, and a most Gracious King to trust to: this hath been their Doctrine, and ought we not to practice it?
A46343Why therefore should we thus talk?
A46343or remain dissatisfied when he hath given us the best security that our Cause admits of?
A46343so just to all, and hath He not promised to uphold and maintain this Church, and her Legitimate Children?
A44723Why are the Nobility and Gentry so extreamly averse to the Repeal of the Test and Penal Laws?
A44723and if our Church fall this way, is there any reason to expect that it should ever rise again?
A44723can we blame any man for consenting to Repeal the Test and Penal Laws, when we recommend it to them by reading the Declaration?
A44723if you say that this tends to destroy the Church of England and the Protestant Religion, I ask whether this be the necessary consequence of it?
A44723s.n.,[ London?
A44723whether the King can not keep his promise to the Church of England if the Test and Penal Laws be Repealed?
A44723why do they forfeit the King''s Favour, and their Honourable Stations, rather then comply with it?
A61987Alas what allegiance, or duty can any temporall Prince desire, or expect at his vassals handes, which we are not addressed to performe?
A61987Nay whole finger did ever ake, but Catholiques for your Majesties present Title and Dominions?
A61987That the Lyon rampant is passant, whereas the passant had beene rampant?
A67333But, Mr. Speaker, whilst these men have thus bent their Witts, against the Law of their Country; have they not neglected their own profession?
A67333What Tares are grown up in the field, wch they should have tilled?
A67333[ 2], 6 p. Printed for Richard Smithers,[ London?]
A54696And being urged again to answer whether they desired Peace or War?
A54696Shall she cry out that her Friends have dealt Treacherously with her, and are become her Enemies?
A54696Shall the Tears lie upon her Cheeks?
A30974And upon what grounds can more Justice be expected from such than from honest substantial Freeholders?
A30974Must it of necessity follow that they had Right because they Claimed it?
A30974The Fourth Question, At what time the benefit of Clergy ought to be pleaded or demanded?
A30974To whom this Privilegium Clericale, or Exemption from Temporal Jurisdiction, ought to have been allowed?
A30974What signified King John''s making them Eligible?
A76181For who should strengthen the Peoples hearts and defend the Cause of the LORD against them, if such a Ministry were down?
A48489Whether Clergy- men are to be thought ignorant of the Contents of the Homilies?
A48489Would they have sworn Fidelity to the Dauphin of France, breaking their Oath of Fidelity to their natural Lord, the King of England?
A48489and have stood under the Dauphin''s Banner Displayed against the King of England?
A48489and his Gentry should recommend?
A3930051?
A39300And unless they themselves also better understood, than they commonly do, what is according to the Liturgy, what not?
A39300But I will propose the Question, whether any man can be a fair and lawful Witness, who Swears on his own behalf, and for his own advantage?
A39300But that which the Justices may well hold the Informers and their Witnesses to is, what Exercise of Religion they saw there?
A39300The Informer is the Accuser: and is it reasonable that he should be both Accuser and Witness too?
A41287A man shall be Excommunicated for a Pig, or for an Apple, and such like things?
A41287In the next place( I beseech you Sir) consider about what their Spirituall Sword is exercised, about things no way lying under the stroke thereof?
A41287Now Sir, who are the authors of those jealousies?
A41287Now there needed not to have beene any breaches of Parliaments, had there not been something disliked in them, and what was that?
A41287The other concerning the Governement of the Church, by Arch- bishops, Bishops,& c. whether it should be countenanced or no?
A41287What hath caused so many hard censures, and harder executions, but these indifferent ceremonies?
A41287What hath occasioned those calamities, and dangers, which we feele, and which wee feare, but those indifferent ceremonies?
A41287[ London?
A33356And who can discern b ● t the Priest; expression is as agreeable to the Cardinals Comment, as that is to his Text?
A33356But may not Parliaments secure us by Laws and Provisions restraining the Powers which endanger us?
A33356But what if the Children to whom the Estate is left, be Roman Catholicks, are they to be thrust from an Estate left them by their Heretical Parents?
A33356Hereupon how are we concerned to look about us?
A33356How many Seas of Protestant Blood do we think might have satisfied such harmless Catholicks?
A33356I, but what if his tempter be such as to comply with such violent proceedings; or his temper being better, what if it be over- ruled?
A33356Is it meritorious to kill all in the Realm?
A33356Our Estates, Lives, and Souls are in extreme hazard, and what have we more?
A33356VVhat need they more to stop the mouths of any, that will dare hereafter to accuse their Church as uncharitable?
A33356What if he be perswaded as other Catholicks are, that he must in Conscience proceed thus?
A33356What if he can not do otherwise, without apparent hazard of his Crown or Life?
A33356What?
A54150But saith the Bishops and Hierarchy, What shall become of us?
A54150But what will become of Holy Church, will some say?
A54150If it be said, What shall become of the Magistrate or Magistrates, things being thus settled?
A54150Now were it prudential to set up any of these three, as the present condition and complexion of the Nations are?
A54150What hath been the Fama clamosa for many years of old, and of late before the War, and since the coming in of the King, and is so at this day?
A54150Where were the hazard?
A54150for were it not unreasonable that the Magistrate or Magistrates should be in worse case then the People?
A54150if the Magistrate withdraw his hand, where shall we have Maintenance?
A54150where shall we have a place to Preach in?
A33923And are there not many liberal Concessions from the Crown before Edward the Sixth?
A33923Besides what Force was there to perform this extraordinary Exploit?
A33923First, That the Legislative Power was all of it lodged in the Conqueror; Why else did he Swear to make Equitable Laws?
A33923For had our ForeFathers nothing which they could call their own till the Reformation?
A33923For not to mention the Barons Wars, How many Tylers and Cades, and Kets and Flammocks, have we had within the compass of Four hundred Years?
A33923If they are so Vertuously enclined, Why did they submit their Wills and Powers to a Publick Regulation?
A33923If we are to submit to all this hardship, because it falls within the compass of Male Administration, What do our Fundamental Laws signify?
A33923Is not Magna Charta a Popish Law?
A33923What?
A33923Will he stand a Course, where he knows there are nothing but Rocks and Shallows, without any prospect of Advantage by the Voyage?
A61839And are they not yet for all that both bound in the exercise of those powers to obey the King and his Laws?
A61839By this time I doubt not, all that are not willfully blind( for who so blind, as he that will not see?)
A61839Can any think God will wink at such foul partiality?
A61839Do they not both pretend their Powers to be of God?
A61839For what is it cum ratione insanire, if this be not?
A61839How then cometh it to pass, that these are pronounced innocent, and those guilty?
A61839I demand then: As to the Regal Power, is not the case of the Bishops and of the Ministers every way alike?
A61839Is there not clearly the same reason of both?
A61839To deny fire to be hot, or water to be moist, or snow to be white; when our sences enform us they are such?
A61839or account them pure with the bag of deceitful weights?
A67115How then can this saying stand, that he will visit the sinnes of the Fathers on the Children to the third and fourth generation?
A67115What affection of men and women one to another can be so great as the affection of Adam to his wife?
A67115What is the hope of the Hypocrite that he hath gained, when God taketh away his soule?
A67115What will his gainefull office advantage him when God findeth and judgeth him guilty for profaning his holy Ordinance and taking his Name in vaine?
A67115what ease or mitigation of sorrow, paine, and griefe, will it be to you, that you see them leade the way and goe before you?
A87355Jordan, Thomas, 1612?-1685?
A87355Jordan, Thomas, 1612?-1685?
A45461But are we not to take care of our children and posterity as well as of our selves?
A45461For suppose King and people of England all popish, why might they not all reform together?
A45461For the fifth Section, How that may be lawfull[ for an entire body to do which may not be lawfull for a part] and so for us now though not for thee?
A45461His words are plain: first, if we would hostes exerto ● agere, deale like profest enemies, desiisset nobis vis numerorum& copiarum?
A45461Say, did God hide the liberty of resistance from those Primitive Christians or no?
A45461Thirdly, he saith, Cui bell ● 〈 ◊ 〉 idonei?
A45461Was it in the new?
A45461Was it in the old Testament?
A45461or M Goodwin?
A45461should we have wanted force of numbers?
A45461what war had we not been fit for?
A5773211. and several others?
A5773215.10, 11) And save them by converting them from the evil of their waies, and so cover a multitude of sins, which have been ushered in by this?
A57732And Peter begs the Disciples, for the Lords sake, that they would submit, and what is so much to a Christian as Gods glory?
A57732But how may it be said he knew it not?
A57732But if the Higher Powers rise against mee, to kill mee without cause, must I not defend my self?
A57732God disallows of Power so taken?
A57732If they shall not escape the vengeance of God, who refuse to declare the whole counsel of God, what then will become of such as exhort to rebellion?
A57732Is it not the same now?
A57732Is it so, that every Christian, yea, every soul ought to bee subject to the Higher Powers?
A57732Oh what blood then have such drawn on them, which cry through the Nation aloud for vengeance?
A57732Some may say, what advantage will that bee to mee to repent except others that have been guilty shall do the same?
A57732and who almost,( I may say) hath not been guilty herein, as often as the powers have offended him?
A57732how have wee been talked of as such a people, if we had opportunity?
A92581And if we meet with obstructions and opposition in carrying on those Duties, are not We the only Judges thereunto?
A92581For what can be more Civill then to determine what Civill Duties We ought to pay to our King, or what Civill Power he ought to be possessed of?
A92581It is a subject for the dispute of Church Judicatories, whether his Majesty hath a negative voice in Parliament or not?
A30556And may it be expected that ever Christianity shall be restored to that state of purity as it was in its beginning?
A30556And whether do I judge that ever the Ministry can be again received by the gift of the holy spirit onely, without natural learning and languages?
A30556And whether the same spirit is to be waited for and received?
A30556and in respect of your Ministry, how greatly are you degenerated from the Ministry which the Christians once had?
A30556have you not lost that, and are departed from it which gave the name of Christian, and so hath the name without the thing?
A30556how is my spirit 〈 ◊ 〉 oppressed in the remembrance of your woful fall?
A30556shall not the good husbandman destroy this Tree with all its corrupt fruit, and shall not his own hand accomplish the purpose of his own heart?
A30556what cheating?
A30556what cozening?
A30556what cruelty, envy and murder one against another?
A30556what pride and vain glory?
A30556what shall succeed this present degeneration?
A30556what shall ● … say unto you but this?
A30556what whoredoms and fornication?
A86192For now they say we have no King, because we feared not the Lord; What should a King doe to us?
A86192Returne unto me and I will returne unto you saith the Lord of Hosts; but you said wherein shall wee returne?
A86192they said, What should a King doe to us?
A86192will a man robbe his Gods?
A86192yet have yee robbed mee; but yee say wherein have wee robbed thee?
A02862Aenaea?
A02862Againe, what necessity had the Popes to vse force of armes, when the consciences of men were vnder their commaund?
A02862Alas, how then would they haue liued, if they could haue erred or failed in faith?
A02862How often( saith the same Liuie s) haue our fathers and ancestors giuen charge to the Magistrates, that externall ceremonies should bee forbidden?
A02862Quid est imperatoricum ecclesia?
A02862Vigilas ne deū gens?
A02862What hath the Emperour to do with the Church?
A02862What?
A02862shall we say, that all these were the oracles of heauen?
A02862the Vica ● s generall of Iesus Christ?
A02862the guides and grounds of religion?
A02862the heads of the Church?
A02862the successors of S. Peter?
A02862to reuerse his iudgements, to correct his lawes, to restraine or constraine him at pleasure and with case?
A02862what is this to the Bishop of Rome?
A02862what maiestie should he be adiudged to beare, who is vnder the authority of another man?
A02862wil worldly Princes endure such, who are not only vnseruiceable vnto them, but dishonorable, but rebellious, for their liefetenants?
A69769Have we not then sad cause of deep Sorrow and Humiliation?
A69769To this last the Moderator reply''d, Mr. Gilbert, What if they should call you?
A69769and do you question our Clerk''s honesty?
A69769do you distrust us?
A69769had been regarded, they would not have chosen a Moderator against whom there was such a considerable exception?
A643421 sheet([ 1] p.) s.n.,[ London?
A64342: 1688?]
A64342V. Whether any ought to believe he will be for Liberty any longer than it serves his turn?
A64342WHether any Real and Zealous Papist was ever for Liberty of Conscience?
A64342Whether if these Penal Laws and Test were repealed, there would not many turn Papists that now dare not?
A64342Whether the King be a Real and Zealous Papist?
A64342Whether this King in his Brother''s Reign did not cause the Persecution against Dissenters to be more violent than otherwife it would have been?
A64342and whether his great eagerness to have the Penal Laws and Test repealed be onely in order to the easie establishing of Popery?
A64342if he be; whether he can be truly for Liberty of Conscience?
A85375& quare conturbas me?
A85375QVare tristis es anima mea?
A04434And heere, againe, he asked, what more they had to say?
A04434And here his Maiestie,( as hereafter, at the end of euery obiection hee did) asked them whether they had any more to say?
A04434And so asked them again, if they had anything else to say?
A04434At which pause, it growing toward night, his Maiestie asked againe, if they had any more to say?
A04434But how long, trovv yee, did this continue?
A04434In somuch that a pert Minister asked me, if I thought Baptism so necessary, that if it were omitted, the child should be damned?
A04434In the Persons, first, why Lay men, as Chancelors& Commissaries should do it?
A04434Secondly, with a question vnanswerable, asking them how long they woulde bee weake?
A04434Whether the Church had power to institute an externall significant signe?
A04434whether 45. yeares were not sufficient for them to growe strong?
A70777Are our Papists and Protestants worse here then there?
A70777If she affects an Union, why should she uphold the Means of Division?
A70777Or are our Differences greater?
A70777Or are our Numbers more dangerously unequal, that we dare not trust a Law that others in our very Circumstances are so happy under?
A70777Ought not the Dissenters to suspect her Integrity, in refusing a good Understanding, in the very way that must save those she would gain?
A70777Why then may not that be done here that has been so happily acted elsewhere?
A70777are they any more then Law?
A54505And doth not the Iudicial Law expresly direct unto the satisfactory expiation thereof, by putting to death the blood- guilty?
A54505And is not Gods controversie with a Land, defiled with blood, 〈 ◊ 〉 judgment be executed?
A54505And whether the children born of them in their pretended conjugal Society, ought not to be separated, and cast out from patrimonial Inheriting?
A54505And whether the children born of them, ought not to be cast out from inheriting in Christian Nations of the Reformed true Religion?
A54505And who knoweth, whether your favor in the eyes of the Estates, be not for such a time as this?
A54505But however it may be, may not the same reproof and complaint be applyed to them, as was to Samuel for his mourning for Saul?
A54505Doth not the Moral Law expresly prohibit murther?
A54505God thus thundering and speaking as it were from Heaven; who can but tremblingly speak?
A54505If children should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out?
A54505Thou that makest thy boast of the Law, through breaking of the Law, dishonorest thou God?
A54505What peace, so long as the whoredoms of thy mother Jezebel, and her witchcrafts are so many?
A54505Who knoweth not, what mischief hath ensued by an easie receiving of Traditions?
A54505Why not much more therefore in the case of notorious blood- guiltiness, by vertue of the sixth Commandment of the Decalogue?
A59254And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgement of God?
A59254How are the faces of Gods faithfull servants covered with shame, and their hearts filled with sorrow and grief 〈 ◊ 〉 thereof?
A59254How is Religion made to stink by reason of your mis- carriages, and like to become a scorn and a reproach in all the Christian world?
A59254How is the Golden Cord of Government broken in sunder?
A59254Or shall he break the Covenant, and be delivered?
A59254Shall he prosper( saith God) shall he escape, that doth such things?
A59254Wherefore then lift you up your selves above the Congregation of the Lord?
A59254Will ye speak wickedly for God, and talk deceitfully for him?
A59254and he that keepeth thy soul, doth not he know it?
A59254and shall not he render to every man according to his works?
A59254the Honour and Authority of Magistracy laid in the dust?
A35558And why not here also, Teraphim being joyned with other good words, in a good sence?
A35558And why so much caution I pray?
A35558Blessed Scripture, how hast thou been wrested and racked, by corrupt, illiterate teachers; to serve their ungodly private ends?
A35558But how come Images, here; and Teraphims; that is, Idols: as particulars of Gods worship?
A35558But what if this Idolatrie be but a conceit of Interpreters, some Interpreters: and upon better examination, prove no such matter?
A35558But what use of pictures or images in Gods service?
A35558How really profitable and advantagious hath it proved in all ages to wordly Wise men?
A35558O how have the Pulpits rung with, Tophet is prepared for the King: and, He shall bind ▪ their Kings in chains, and the like?
A35558Or to religious use?
A35558That he was really and literally, of the Royall seed, and linage, and did not despise the very name of a King, King David?
A35558The Children of Israel?
A35558This made a wise Heathen say, with some admiration; Quae magna gaudia, nisi ex malis?
A35558Thou that abhorrest Idols, doest thou commit Sacriledge?
A35558Well, but how doth it appear, that by that goodly title, or denomination; those Rebellious Idolatrous Tribes are immediately spoken of, or to?
A35558What an objection is this?
A35558What shall we make of it?
A35558Why?
A35558Yet let me say?
A35558there; Now for a long time Israel hath been: what?
A27494Again a servant voluntarily binds himself to a Master, and after a manner constitutes him over him, What?
A27494But doth that suffice?
A27494But what are your Synodall Decrees?
A27494How may it appear, that the power of the Civil Sword is only meant by that Government, and that the power of the Keys is not comprebended therein?
A27494Is it probable that Moses and Peter had herein so nice and curious conceits?
A27494Meraritis, v. 30?
A27494Quid hoc?
A27494The master of the family is for the welfare of it: forma est propter actionem, is therefore actio nobilior formâ?
A27494Vis arcessam adhuc altius, vol è veteri Testamento, atque ipsâ adeò lege divinâ?
A27494What should I say?
A27494Which kind of Preheminence if some ought to have in a Kingdome, who but the King shall have it?
A27494Will any man deny that the Church doth need the rod of corporall punishment to keep her children in obedience withall?
A27494who be the Authors of them, and who be they that have approved them?
A52130But you will say, why doth he then discourage Kings from the like Sovereignty?
A52130Do you plead with the Casuists, that any man may dispense with his own Promise, where the Non- performance prejudices no one?
A52130Do you think the World so dim- sighted, that they can not discern what is under so thin a Veil?
A52130Does it( think you) become the Son of Vicar to prate thus of an Archbishop?
A52130How do these agree?
A52130How unfortunate on Earth still is this blessed ROYAL MARTYR?
A52130If his thirsty Wit be so pretty, what may we expect from his new Wine?
A52130If you ask why Transpros''d?
A52130Is it your Protection for railing whole Pages, that you Preface the Libel with his just Titles of Pious, Learned, and Wise?
A52130Is this your Complement, to embrace him, that you may stab him?
A52130Nothing how to root out, both by Disputation and Discipline, the abuses and encroachments of the Church of Rome?
A52130Now would it not vex a man to be thus unseasonably diverted from the weightiest Business of this Nation, and of one or two besides?
A52130Now you wi ● h your Preface look to your self, What can you say in your own defence?
A52130What if they will not take fair warning?
A52130What if your Adversary should find a patch''d hole about you?
A52130What is this but to muzzle the Dogs while the Wolfs do range?
A52130What think you of this sorry Latinist, Marcellinus?
A52130Would you have the Indictment confessed by standing MUTE, when as the Witnesses are the only Malefactours?
A52130do you not understand him?
A52130seemed he to know nothing of the Primitive Religion Restor''d?
A52130was he ignorant of these, or is all this nothing?
A86986Did he appoint Nimrod and Pharaoh?
A86986Did he authorize the Mahumetane Sultuns?
A86986Did he set up the Babylonian and Persian Tyrants?
A86986and set up Governements that prove scourges to the sons of men?
A30531And will you kill and destroy all such as do not?
A30531But you may say, Who art thou, inferiour man, that seemest to advise us that are high and potent, and wise enough for our selves?
A30531Can these things stand?
A30531Is it in your hearts to destroy the Heritage of God?
A30531Is it in your hearts to effect it?
A30531Is there no cause unto you of Consideration in this matter?
A30531Is this Iustice and true Iudgment?
A30531Is this for your Happiness and Prosperity?
A30531Must none wait upon God, and worship Him, and pray to Him, but after your Prescriptions and Limitations?
A30531Ought you not to lay these things to heart?
A30531and, can you be happy in these proceedings, while the Innocent suffer under you?
A30531do you think to extinguish an Innocent People from off the Earth?
A30531is this nothing to you?
A30531or, do you judge this is well doing?
A30531or, who shall plead for you in the day of your reward, when God himself ariseth unto Iust Iudgment, to judge all flesh, and to deliver the Innocent?
A30531was not their end woful and miserable to God and shameful to men?
A30531will ye persecute men for their Religion- sake, while yet they walk uprightly in their Conversations among men?
A30530Come let us reason together; What think you?
A30530Have they any example that ever went before for their wickedness?
A30530Or do they follow their example in these practices?
A30530What do you judge?
A30530and after this manner the people of this generation begun to reason among themselves, saying, what would the people do if they had power?
A30530and what Ministers do you allow of?
A30530and what maintenance would they allow them?
A30530doth any man stop their ear, so as that they can not hear this to be true?
A30530is not this almost incredible, that the teachers should put the nation to such a charge as this, and yet people receives nothing answerable to it?
A30530of England planted?
A30530or what flocks do they keep?
A30530or with whom shall we parallel them?
A30530to whom may they be compared?
A30530was there ever such a generation of Teachers as this is?
A30530was there ever such a generation of teachers?
A30530what Ministers would they approve of?
A67481If there was not one Protestant Dissenter in England, how would that hinder a Popish Successor from bringing in Popery?
A67481Pray Sir, were you never on the Negative side in any Law that was pass''d in those Parliaments wherein you sate?
A41194And if the Murtherer of the meanest Subject be obnoxious to capital Punishment; what should he be made liable unto that murthereth a Parliament?
A41194And that he would not continue to make Bonfires of his Subjects, whensoever any of them turn Protestants?
A41194And that they have not dealt with their other Allie the King of Spain for abolishing the Inquisition?
A41194For the Gentleman having asked him, why they did not discover and make appear the Illegitimacy and Supposititiousness of the Prince of Wales?
A41194For who can make them see that wilfully shut their Eyes, and who take pleasure in being hood- winked, that they ▪ may be led about blind?
A41194Has he performed any one Thing he undertook, and which was expected from him, that he could avoid the doing of?
A41194Has he proved true to any one Friend that trusted and served him, save as they have been Slaves to his Will, and Tools of his Arbitrariness?
A41194Hath he from the time he came in to this day, been known to discern or reward Merit?
A41194Hath he kept one Promise he ever made, that he has been in a Condition to evade?
A41194Or who can rouse those to value and look after Freedom, that place their Contentment in having their Ears bored and nailed to Kensington Gates?
A41194Was not the late Lord Lovelace, who could not speak without an Oath, Blasphemy, or Execration?
A41194Yet how little probability is there of recovering the Nation either to reverence themselves, or him whom they ought?
A41194s.n.,[ London: 1695?]
A46961And therefore to ask, Who shall Absolve us from our Oath to King James?
A46961But because some Men have moved another Question, Who shall be Judg when there is an Insurrection, Rebellion or Invasion?
A46961By what Law?
A46961Has He a Throne like God?
A46961If Queen Maries Laws were no Laws, because they were wicked persecuting Laws, why were they repealed?
A46961Is he of Himself, and for Himself?
A46961Now I would fain know wherein those who transport the King''s Liege Subjects, without any Power to transport them, differ from Kidnappers?
A46961Or has he a Personal Authority from God, antecedent to Laws, to be a King?
A46961Or has he the Natural Authority of a Father to govern his Children?
A46961Or were Mankind made in the day of their Creation, by Nations, and created Prince and People, as they were created Male and Female?
A46961Then it must be proved that he has begotten his Three Kingdoms, and all the People in all other His Majesty''s Dominions?
A46961This Personal Authority of the King, antecedent to all the Laws of the Land, independent on them, and superiour to them: whence is it?
A46961Was it not thus when the Two Houses were erected, and endowed with the like Power?
A46961Where is Arbitrariness then?
A46961and consequently, whether there be occasion or not, according to Law, to imploy the Militia, and to draw them forth into Actual Service?
A46961or those that destroy them, without any Power to destroy them, differ from Murderers?
A46961why were they not declared to be null from the beginning?
A46956: 1689?]
A46956But do the Seminaries come and bring us the true Doctrine of Christ?
A46956But how comes it to be Treason to speak against a Religion which is itself High Treason, and is Proscribed by so many Laws?
A46956But is not Popery Malum in se?
A46956But is there any Law of England, that Popery shall be the King''s Religion?
A46956But why are they called Penal Laws, for have not all Laws a Penalty annexed to them?
A46956Do they not bring us another Gospel?
A46956Is Idolatry an Evil only by chance, and by happening to be prohibited?
A46956Is it not eternally Evil?
A46956Or is it Declared by any Law, that Popery either is, or can be his Religion?
A46956Si Rex est supra Legem, tunc est extra Legem; Num Rex Angliae est Exlex?
A46956Whether they have not offered up whole Hecatombs of these Sacrifices in most Countries?
A46956Will you, for the sake of your little Conveniencies, do the greatest Evils, which you know to be such?
A46956is the King of England an Outlaw?
A46956s.n.,[ London?
A26144And can a whole Nation be in Reason suspected to harbour Malice, and to have a Design against the Common- weal, that is against themselves?
A26144But what did the High Court do upon that Complaint?
A26144But what is the proper Subject of their Oyer and Terminer?
A26144But who knows how far a single Precedent will be made use of in times to come?
A26144But who shall judge what is a Parliamentary course, but a Parliament?
A26144But why should any man divide and sever those that are Entire?
A26144Filmers?
A26144If it be done in a Parliamentary course, what occasion can there be to answer for it?
A26144If it were a Libell and Slander, why did the Lords receive it, and cause it to be entred of Record as they did?
A26144Information to begin here: what need was there of printing it?
A26144Nor can a thing so dishonourable as malice and ill design, be decently or justly conceiv''d or objected against so Great and Grave an Assembly: why?
A26144Now how can any man say in Defiance of these Laws, That there can be any long discontinuance of Parliaments?
A26144One would think this were a strange answer of the Judges, to deny their advice; Were they not Assistants to the Lords in matters of Law?
A26144Then why should it be so heinous a thing in the House of Commons, more than in the Lords?
A26144What would the Author of the Sermon preach''d before the University have said in these Cases that I have cited?
A26144Why did they not rather reject the Information and punish the Author?
A56221For while one saith, I am of Paul, and another, I am of Apollo, are ye not carnall?
A56221For yee are yet carnall: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnall, and walke as men?
A56221Whether the National League& Covenant we have taken doth not in sundry respects strongly ingage us against Independency?
A56221and therfore the first of them rather to be embraced then the last, without any long debate?
A56221when as Papists, Anabaptists and all other Sects may claime the like exemption, upon the like grounds as they alleadge?
A48818But all Princes being equally concern''d in this matter, what if a Question should arise between any two of them?
A48818But how can that be, when God is Judge himself?
A48818But how can this be?
A48818But how should he do this, so as that the punishment may have its effect, in warning others not to transgress in like manner?
A48818But in his Want of Power to do them hurt?
A48818But what Way should that be, by which Princes can be oblig''d against their Wills to do Right to one another?
A48818But what should Subjects do in this Case?
A48818Can they think themselves secure because they are at Peace with him?
A48818Could David say Promotion comes not from thence?
A48818Did he sell them for Slaves, or take away what they had?
A48818How much more ought Princes to dread the just Judgment of God, if they presume to Appeal to him for no Cause, or for such as he hates and abhors?
A48818How was that?
A48818If he deals thus with his own People, what are Forreigners to expect at his hands?
A48818It bringeth the people into a Contempt of Authority, and they are not much to be blamed for it, for what are they the better for such a Government?
A48818Must they be left to the Wills of these Tyrants?
A48818Must they endure all the load of Oppression that these will lay upon them?
A48818Or can they rely upon his Oath?
A48818Or of them that govern weak Kings, which is commonly worse?
A48818Should the Judge hinder the doing of Justice?
A48818What should other Princes or States that profess the same Religion do in this Case?
A48818What then?
A48818When he had taken Babylon, where the Jews were in a state of Captivity; did he use the Right of Conquest over them?
A48818Wherein then can they be safe?
A48818or what if one should invade the unquestionable Rights of the other?
A48818that is, for a few Mens pleasure must a Nation be made miserable?
A34089And can you make it appear to us?
A34089And what will it signifie then?
A34089Can he stop the Current of it when he pleases?
A34089Can not those Commissioners take any of your and our Preachers, Teachers, or Ministers to task when they please?
A34089Do Guns hear Reason, or regard Laws?
A34089Do you think there is any Temporal or Spiritual- Power here in England above the Dispencing Power?
A34089Have we, or can we have any Higher Power here in England, than King, Lords and Commons in Parliament Assembled?
A34089M. Pen, How have the Dragoons minded our Properties( in these early days) in divers places here in England already?
A34089Not three skips of a Louse; and if it have a Penalty, Can not any King by his Prerogative and Authority Royal, Dispence with the Penalty?
A34089Notwithstanding your New Charter?
A34089Pen''s New Charter for Liberty?
A34089Pen, or George Whitehead, M. Alsop, Mr. Lobb, or Mr. Mead, or Mr. Bowyer, as well as the Bishop of London, D. Sharp, or D. Doughty?
A34089Pray M. Pen tell us whether they have done or do now so in France?
A34089Pray tell me, can your New Charter[ if you had it] be made by any Higher or other Power?
A34089Shall your New Charter have a Penalty inserted to be inflicted on the infringers or breakers of it or no?
A34089The Laws that are now Dispensed with and rendred useless, were they not made by that Power?
A34089Thirdly, And above all Consider what Security or Validity this New Charter can be of, when there is a standing Army kept on foot?
A34089What think you of their Carriage and Quartering, will it agree with your New Charter for Liberty?
A34089Who can tell what King we may have after our present Sovereign, whether so merciful or so just?
A34089Will Dragoons mind Charters, or Arguments do you think?
A34089if not, what will your New Charter signifie?
A34089s.n.,[ London: 1688?]
A50959& c. how presum''st thou to be his lord, to be whose only Lord, at least in these things, Christ both dy''d and rose and livd again?
A509593.20?
A509595.12, them by what autoritie doth the magistrate judge, or, which is worse, compell in relation to the church?
A509596.2: if excommunicate, whom the church hath bid go out, in whose name doth the magistrate compell to go in?
A50959And how for thy good by forcing, oppressing and insnaring thy conscience?
A50959Be subject not only for wrath, but for conscience sake: how for conscience sake against conscience?
A50959But how compells he?
A50959But some are ready to cry out, what shall then be don to blasphemie?
A50959But why dost thou judge thy brother?
A50959For ask them, or any Protestant, which hath most autoritie, the church or the scripture?
A50959If not, why different the governors?
A50959To summe up all in brief, if we must beleeve as the magistrate appoints, why not rather as the church?
A50959When as we finde, Iames 4.12, there is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?
A50959Wilt thou then not be affraid of the power?
A50959if not as either without convincement, how can force be lawfull?
A50959if not by the works of Gods law, how then by the injunctions of mans law?
A50959the sacrifice of the wicked is an abomination: how much more when he bringeth it with a wicked minde?
A50959who art thou that judgest the servant of another?
A50959why not church- ministers in state- affairs, as well as state- ministers in church- affairs?
A26314Are these then the things, Brethren, for which the Unity of Christ is rent asunder by you?
A26314Fraternal Inheritance slandered?
A26314From what Heaven did he fall upon Earth?
A26314From whence came these Reformers?
A26314How shall they preach unless they be sent?
A26314If it was no longer so; From whence departed Calvin?
A26314Of whom received they their Doctrin, and Authority to Preach?
A26314This one thing we particularly expostulate with you; this we incessantly demand of you; why have youmade a Schism?
A26314We ask again and again, why they have departed?
A26314What Sea cast him on our Coast?
A26314What soyl put forth this Sprig?
A26314Why therefore brethren, have you not, with the whole World, remained in the stock?
A26314did he not converse in the same House?
A26314did he not eat the same spiritual Meat?
A26314do you blush at the Name of Sons, amongst whom the first born Lewis daily erects new Trophys to the Church, the best Mother?
A26314the Virtue, and truth of the Sacraments of the Church divided?
A26314why do you demurr?
A26314why do you resist?
A26314why have you, together with the Altars, violated the Vows, and desires of the Faithful?
A26314why they have forsaken Catholick vnity?
A47635( A pretty Artifice to shut the King out of that Text, Let every Soul be subject to the Higher Powers) the Parliament, or the Bishops?
A47635But if the Prince in punishing an ● thers Conscience, proceeds according to his own, is not his so far innocent too?
A47635But is not this, says one, a thing somewhat difficult to keep this Spiritual Army thus conceal''d?
A47635For can they violate the Divine Majesty in punishing Error?
A47635How came Cromwell, Ineton, and Bradshaw trow, to merit their ● yburn Pomps and second Funeral Solemnities?
A47635How cheap was Fame then, when Luean acquir''d it by transversing the weekly- Posts?
A47635How if those Winds that whistle near our Coasts, should whisper Tales there?
A47635In this uncertainty of Information, what Course shall we steer?
A47635What Myst''ries of Iniquity do we see?
A47635What does he think of a Communication between Rivers?
A47635Who can tell at how great a distance every Breath of moving Air may continue articulate?
A47635Who would have imagin''d that a Game at Picket could have made so much mischeif?
A47635Will you thence infer that none of the Clergy are men fit to be trusted?
A47635Yet what do these Men?
A47635shall we consult the Oracle?
A70226( nay, to accommodate the Case to the Objection, — Was he so much as able to protect us?)
A70226A word to the wavering, or, An answer to the enquiry into the present state of affairs whether we owe allegiance to the King in these circumstances?
A70226And all the men of Judah answered the men of Israel, Because the King is near of kin to us: wherefore then be you angry for this matter?
A70226And would you bring the Acts of the Rump, or those at the latter end of King Charles I. Reign, for Presidents of Law, especially against a King?
A70226But first, does this hold on both Sides?
A70226Is that it, which you would be at?
A70226Upon all this, Is it Natural?
A70226Why should Cham be cursed, if Noah''s Drunkenness had cancell''d his Son''s Respect and Duty?
A70226Why then do you blame the King for going away, from that his Duty?
A70226have we eaten at all of the King''s cost?
A70226or hath he given us any gift?
A53703And how foolish, senceless, and unbecoming of Men, would any other Thoughts be?
A53703And what was the ground and occasion of the Quarrel?
A53703And what wise man, methinks would not at length be contented, that these differences and indifferent things may be parted withal together?
A53703But is this all?
A53703Can he force himself to assent unto that, whereunto in truth he doth not assent?
A53703Can then other men compell this assent?
A53703For what if some Officers of Ecclesiastical Courts have been inriched by the booty they have got from Dissenters?
A53703How can this be forced?
A53703How shall he do to be otherwise minded?
A53703Is it not to declare in the Soul, that if it practise these things, God will judge it the Last Day, and pronounce Sentence against him?
A53703Is it not, in the first place, to apply the Mind and Understanding to consider of what sort it is, in referrence unto the future Judgment of God?
A53703It is said therefore, Let Men take this liberty unto themselves: Who forbids them to judge of Themselves and of their Actions, what they please?
A53703It is true indeed, that the Parliament have thought meet some years past, to direct unto another course of Proceedure?
A53703Nay, if he have not constantly sound a severe Interdiction given in by his Conscience against all such things?
A53703Order thereby, than what it may enjoy whilst Men have their Liberty to profess their dissent?
A53703What advantage is it all this while to the Kingdom?
A53703What if they offer to be instructed by any who will take that work upon them, in the things about which their differences are?
A53703What if they plead conscience towards God, and that alone, in their dissent; it being evidently against their whole temporal interest?
A53703What is answered unto this request?
A53703What is the Work or Duty of Conscience in reference hereunto?
A53703What then is the end of these things, of this Severity so earnestly pressed after, to be engaged into?
A53703What though they are every way sound in the Faith, and cordialy imbrace all the doctrine taught formerly in the Church of England?
A53703What though those in this condition are many, and such as in whose peace and industry, the welfare of the Nation is exceedingly concerned?
A54101And will they refuse to be unshakled?
A54101Are there Sanballats, Tobiah''s, and Geshem''s, who vex themselves that there is come a Man to seek the Welfare of all his Israel?
A54101Are there not also, to make the Dissenter compleatly miserable, Imprisoning, Banishing, murdering Laws?
A54101Can the Church of England( Circumstances considered) possibly invent a better Security than she hath by his Majesties Declaration?
A54101Has God put it into the King''s Heart to pitty them, who are left of the Captivity, such whom Penal Laws have not destroyed?
A54101Hath not the Church of England persisted to exercise her Severities upon all Dissenters within her reach, even in the present Reign?
A54101Have we not, with regret beheld the Execution of these Laws?
A54101May this go for some sort of measure of the Churches Interest?
A54101Shall the Fanaticks with alacrity come into the King''s Interest, and will the Church of England appear sullen, soure and averse thereto?
A54101The Ecclesiasticks and some of their designing Adherents, are indeed angry, and why?
A54101To them, what can the Invention of Cruelty it self add?
A54101What would she further have?
A54101Will any Member of the Church of England( so fam''d for Loyalty) repine at his Majesties being truly Glorious?
A54101Will she call into question the Sincerity of his Majesties Promise?
A54101surely no; and hath not this his Act of Tenderness, added highly to his Glory?
A58674And how come they to be Rulers in This Case, and Subjects in All Others?
A58674But what Pretence have they to Govern in This Prerogative more then in All the Rest?
A58674But what if the Danger Presses?
A58674But where''s the Danger at last, of This same Bug- bear- Prerogative of a Dispensing Power?
A58674Do we not Trust Divines, Surgeons, Physicians, Lawyers, Bankers ▪ Relations, Children, Servants?
A58674If the Dispensing Power be an Essential of Government; where should it be Lodg''d, but in the Common Repository of All the Ensigns of Majesty?
A58674Shall a Prince say, Lord, I must not Dispense?
A58674That is to say, as to the Enabling of a Prince to make Slaves of his People?
A58674The Republicans insist mightily upon the Trust, the Receptacle, and the Possible Abuse of it: But what now if there be No Avoyding of such a Trust?
A58674VVhy not of the[ Mint][ Life and Death,][ War and Peace,] for fear of False Money, Protecting Criminals, bringing in Foreign Forces?
A58674What if at the same Time that this Trust is Controverted, there are a Hundred other more Dangerous Trusts, Admitted?
A58674What if the Delay be Certain Death?
A58674What if the Trust, and the Power have Always been in the same Hands?
A58674What if there never was any Government in the World; Or if Humane Society can not subsist WITHOUT it?
A58674What''s Authority, without the Right to Iudge of the Time, the Case, the Measure,& c?
A58674What''s the Chancery, but a Court of Dispensation for Granting Relief in Equity against the Letter of the Law?
A58674What''s to be done, where the Letter of the Law draws One way, and the Conscience of the Prince, Another?
A58674Why is so much more Stress laid upon this Single Prerogative, then upon All the Rest, that may do Fifty times more Mischief?
A58674Will Men have no Government at all, unless they may have such a Government, as God never made, and which God has made Impossible ever to Bee?
A58674and the Disease can not Wait for a Remedy?
A94192And will not others be incouraged by her impunity, to despise their Parents after her example?
A94192In that case, What is to be done?
A94192QUAERE: Whether the Father''s Vow so made, and so confirmed and iterated as abovesaid, be Obligatory or not?
A94192The general rule thus cleared, it remaineth to examine concerning the particular Vow, now in question, whether it be void upon this account or no?
A27361And so doe I Querie, will not the Commons of London yeeld or ascribe unto the Commons of England, as the Commons of London to themselves will ascribe?
A27361And th ● n you say, Whither now Mr. Bellamy?
A27361And what I pray you may such as know mee not, be ready to judge of mee?
A27361But I pray you tell me, is there no difference between the Court of Common- councell, and the Commons in Common- councel?
A27361Hang him, hang him, what hath he done?
A27361I professe my ● eart akes, and my hand trembles, shall I write, or shall I forbeare?
A27361In the next place you begin with an interrogation, as if you had gotten a Com ● ission to ins ●''t; thus; What?
A27361Is this a carriage becomming a sober Christian?
A27361May not the like bee said, as of Books, so of men, where is the man without his errors, without his miscariages?
A27361Mr. John Bellamie, what kinde of man are you?
A27361What is this either to the City Remonstrance, or to my Vindication thereof?
A27361Where did the Remonstrants say that Presbyteriall government was in the Covenant?
A27361Why doe you also wrong the Remonstrants, in saying, They force Presbyteriall government upon others?
A27361Will you never leave fals ● fying?
A27361and yet must Lon ● ● ● s Remonstrance by one of its own members be charged with raising a prejudice against the Parliaments innoceney?
A27361are there three Fundamentalls?
A27361we will not receive impression of any forced construction of the Covenant?
A3372722. when he looked upon the sons of Zerviah as his enemies for counselling him to destroy that Shimei who had cursed him in the day of his flight?
A33727And had Zimri peace who slew his Master?
A33727By whom shall Iacob arise?
A33727For what hopes of any blessing from above, where settlement and prosperity is abused?
A33727How passionately zealous in the cause of God was Moses, when he sees the Idolatry of the people?
A33727In those days there was no King in Israel: and what then?
A33727Let thy hand be against me and against the house of my fathers; but as for these sheep, what have they done?
A33727Quis mente sobrius regibus dicat, saith St. Aug. Nolite curare in regno vestro à quo tueatur vel oppugnetur ecclesia domini vestri?
A33727Should it be so( which God forbid the thoughts of should enter into my heart) yet were this a good for thee?
A33727There was no King in Israel; and what followed?
A33727There was no King in Israel; and what then?
A33727When God raised up Moses, what was his work but this?
A33727When it shall be Treason, Death, Destruction, what not?
A33727a lawful, merciful, gracious King to Rule the outward man, but a bloud- thirsty implacable Tyrant the Devil to hurry the souls of men to destruction?
A33727and Estates, and we shall meet again, and yet Christ and our souls shall part for ever and never meet more?
A33727and that good which God hath raised up his Anointed ones to accomplish for thee?
A33727for he is small: Who shall repair the broken staff of Government?
A33727how earnest in his adjuring and exhorting the people to stick fast to their Religion before he went up to Neb ● to dye there?
A33727how obliging is that Deliverance; how full and fat, and fruitful a Mercy is this?
A33727quis velit esse religiosus vel sacrilegus?
A33727what if we shall have a King, and yet fear not the Lord?
A33727what if we shall have better Laws, but worser Lives?
A33727what if we shall have no more Wars with men, and yet still have the most fatal Wars with God?
A33727what if we shall have plenty, but no piety?
A33727what if we shall lie under less of suffering, and yet live under more of sin?
A33727what then should a King do to us?
A52125And was not that also in Peace, of the Trayterous Position of taking Armes by his Authority against his Person?
A52125And why not, if his Power be indeed of such virtue and extent as is by him chalenged?
A52125For who would not commend Chastity, and raile against Whoreing, while his Rival injoyes their Mistresse?
A52125Had not the three Acts of Corporations, of Militia, and the Five Miles, sufficiently quieted it?
A52125It is no more than other persons may do to the King, or doubtless the Privy Council may Advise him in this particular, and why not his Great Council?
A52125Must all things be done by Maxims or Reasons of State; nothing for Affection?
A52125Must not Surinam be a sufficient cause of quarrel with Holland, to any Commissioner of the Plantations?
A52125Such things therefore are, if ever, not needlessely thought for good fortune sake only to be attempted, and when was there any thing lesse necessary?
A52125Then those that had proposed it, yet before they would enter upon the Debate, asked, Whether they might have liberty?
A52125Was ever in any Age or Nation of the World, the Sword drawn upon no better Allegation?
A52125Were not all the Votes as it were in Fee Farme, of those that were intrusted with the sale?
A52125Why this darknesse towards us?
A52125Why was it further stirred?
A54229And for packing of a Parliament, if that were the business and Design at last; why is it not attempted at first?
A54229Besides, what have they further to seek, or which way can they possibly agree it?
A54229But by the same reason that they can Repeal this, they may Enact another, and if so, may not the House of Peers be quickly another set of Men?
A54229But if this were not so, is it the same thing to dispence with a Temporary, as a fundamental Law?
A54229Does his going to a Conventicle naturally unqualifie him for a Constables Staff?
A54229If no other security can be had, I say then, let this that is, remain, if there may be such a thing, why should we not imbrace it?
A54229Is the love of Power first objected, and then a design to make a Common- Wealth with it?
A54229Ought she to differ thus with any body?
A54229Should a Mans being of any Religion, hinder him from serving the Country of his Birth?
A54229The Tests, the chief, if not the only thing in debate, have they any Foundation in our Constitution?
A54229To say there is none, is ridiculous; for who can tell, what they may think upon, or from other heads, what may occur to them?
A54229What Tides are these in Government?
A54229Who will Trade where his gettings are none of his own?
A54229With that which says, thou shalt not go to a Conventicle, as with that which says, thou shalt not Kill or Steal?
A54229and less with such a King, upon a point she can not maintain, and that is better left then kept, take the Question, either as to Right or Prudence?
A54229and such Laws as are so specially accommodated, that the reason of them may not live three Years to an end?
A54229and what State is safe, or happy, whose Foundations float upon such movable measures?
A54229are there not some Laws that are of that moral and enduring nature, no time or accident of State can Dispense with?
A54229one to engage the Crown, and t''other to oppose it, for t''other Worlds matters?
A54229or believing Transubstantiation, render him uncapable of being a good Clark?
A54229or live, where he is not sure of his Principle?
A54229shall Opinion give rule to our Properties, and( like Daniels King) change Times and Laws at Pleasure?
A58927And one shall say unto him, What are these wounds in thy hands?
A58927But did not these, that they might neglect their holy Vocation, seek to compass secular Imploiments, and Lay- Offices?
A58927But what then?
A58927By their ill chosen Principles, what would have become of the Prime and most necessary Article of Faith?
A58927For what power had the Emperours by growing Christians, more than those had before them?
A58927Had you the Homoousians a Creed at Nice?
A58927Might not one of the same Order now better have conceal''d these things, had they been true?
A58927Might not the old Dormant Heresies, all of them safely have Revived?
A58927Was it not usual, as oft as they merited it, to restore them, as in the case even of the three Bishops to the Lay- communion?
A58927Were not very many of them, whether one respect their Vices or Ignorance, as well qualified as any other to be Lay- men?
A58927What a Change there is in the last years Creed?
A58927What in the Bishops name is the matter?
A58927What new Power had the Bishops acquired, whereby they turned every Pontificate into a Caiaphat?
A58927What obligation were Christians Subject under to the Magistrate more than before?
A58927What shall I say more?
A58927What was the matter?
A58927What, and to have their Bishops too, Altar against Altar?
A58927Would you Anathemize, Banish, Imprison, Execute us, and burn our Books?
A29451And how is real and effectual performance lesse necessary for the avoiding of perjury now, than it was then?
A29451And then whether any Governours are obliged to a Papal infallibility, under the penalty of having their heads taken off at their own gates?
A29451And what is this but expressely contradictory to the words of the Apostle?
A29451And whether the Law be convenient to that end or not, who shall judge?
A29451And why have not others a better right to re- enforce the old, than any can ever have to erect a new?
A29451Else, what security could there ever be to the best Governours or Governments in the world?
A29451For how can He that is immediately present every where, and in every thing, stand off at a distance in any work of his?
A29451For,( the only known Legal Government once dissolved,) what should such just authority in any over others be grounded on?
A29451How then, in the collating of the Civil power?
A29451If the righteous scarely be saved*, where shall the unrighteous( and perjurious too) appear?
A29451May such Governours or Governments as are not to be continued and tolerated, be taken away and destroyed by private hands?
A29451Or shall it be lawful for those( in what capacity soever) to seek the subversion of it that have sworn to maintain it?
A29451Or, shall it be lawful for any one among them to do as Raviliac, or as Felton did?
A29451Shall it wholly be dissolved?
A29451Shall private persons do it?
A29451There can no seditious party arise but must needs be of that perswasion: Shall this then Legitimate an Insurrection?
A29451What if such a Soveraign Prince be as ill a Governour as Nero was?
A29451What if this Conclusion were true?
A29451What then can any persons whatsoever have to do, to question, or controul that Supreme Person, whom God hath thought fit to use as his own Minister?
A29451What then have any to do in setting up a new Government more than others?
A29451What then?
A29451What, they that have nothing to do with the Legislative Authority?
A29451When Saul was such a Governour, and not to be continued, did David( though already in Sauls roome anoynted,) seeks to destroy him?
A29451Who sees not that this Doctrine is meerly Anabaptistical, striking at the root of all Magistracy properly so called?
A29451Why do ye not rather suffer your selves to be defrauded?
A29451Why doth not the Oath in this case bind simply to the special matter of it, as well as in the former, or in any other?
A29451— Why do ye not rather take wrong?
A4542113. shall not signifie damnation,( poor men, what a weak threed doth the sword hang in, that is just over their soules?
A4542129?
A4542149. saith expresly, that they did ask him, said unto him, Lord, shall wee smite with the sword?
A45421A man may be as truly religious under all the tyranny and slavery in the world, as in the most triumphant prosperous estate?
A45421And therefore to bring the point to an issue, I must thirdly aske, Where this liberty, or the authority for this liberty was, when it was thus hid?
A45421Any part of the Kingdome excluding the King?
A45421But are we not to take care of our children and posterity, as well as of our selves?
A45421For, suppose King and People of England all Popish, why might they not all reform together?
A45421His words are plain: first, if we would hostes exertos agere, deale like profest enemies, desiisset nobis vis numerorum& copiarum?
A45421I shall aske Master Marshall, whether hee hath asked and received knowledge of his Masters mind or no?
A45421If I have spoken well, why smitest thou me?
A45421Say, did God hide the liberty of resistance from those Primitive Christians, or no?
A45421Thirdly, he saith, cui bello non idonei?
A45421Was it in the New?
A45421Was it in the Old Testament?
A45421Why did hee bid buy a Sword?
A45421or Mr. Goodwin?
A45421or if resisters shall carry it away so easily, why may not Warre be avowed against the King, by any that will adventure his wrath?)
A45421should we have wanted force of numbers( i. e. men) or armed souldiers?
A45421what war had we not been fit for?
A70973And are there two greater unkindnesses in the world than these?
A70973And you say, you have been no hinderance to the people to bear the burdens in quietness that are laid upon them: For indeed, why should you?
A70973Are not you the very men that lay these burdens on them?
A70973But if they were absolute, what warrant is there in the Word of God for such Covenants?
A70973But who is it that feeds these malignant humors, and keeps up this disaffection of the people?
A70973But will you be the men of al others, who hinder the Kingdom of God from coming?
A70973Can you promise that any man shall have power whether God will or no?
A70973Is it not this, that Charles Stuart ought to be King?
A70973Therefore, why are the dissentions of Brethren like the bars of a Palace?
A70973This power which God hath set over you for your good, and which the Lord knows hath been favorable and tender over you: What have returns been?
A70973What shall be done for you?
A70973Wil you not preach Christ, unless you may preach up Charles Stuart also?
A70973Will you cease to preach the Gospel rather than cease to preach up Charles Stuart?
A70973and what will they answer for it in the great day of accompt?
A70973and will you indeed stop your own mouths from preaching the blessed Gospel of Christ, rather then be silent about that mans interest?
A70973who is it?
A47888And what Then?
A47888And what was the business, but This?
A47888Averrs?)
A47888BUT is it True then, that the Popish Emissaryes are so busy, and bear so great a sway among Our Dissenters?
A47888But What?
A47888But what is a NARRATIVE?
A47888How come the Multitude to be Judges of Plots, and Popery, more than of Other Crimes and Misdemeanours?
A47888How does all This amount to the Proof of a Faction?
A47888How it comes, of a Down right Popish- Plot, to be a Popishly- Affected- Plot?
A47888If you ask me, To what End?
A47888Is This doing as we would be done by?
A47888NOW the Narrative here in question, is the Narrative of The PLOT; but then there will arise Another Question; Of WHAT Plot?
A47888Or is it doing either as we Have been done by?
A47888Or, What''s the Benefit of Imposing these Flams upon the Nation?
A47888Shall any man Argue that the Disparagement of a Juggle, weakens a Truth?
A47888Shall any man Infer That there were no black Bills Provided, because there were no Arms found in Sr Henry Titchburns house?
A47888What a Bustle there was about Mr. Langhorns being Bury''d in the Temple, and what Remarks upon the Government for shewing That Countenance to Papists?
A47888What becomes of Magna Charta, at This rate, and the Priviledges of an English mans Birth right?
A47888What is become of the Manhood, and Generosity of the English Nation; That we are fal''n into This Insatiate Thirst of Bloud?
A47888What is my Affirming that Langhorn was not Bury''d in the Temple, to the Business of Valladolid, or Salamanea?
A47888Where to our Fellow- Subjects; in our Needlesse, and Unmannerly Importunities, for more Rigour then the very Letter of the Law will bear?
A47888Where''s our Respect to our Superiours; while we thus Arraign Authority?
A47888must the Evidence therefore of the Pistol and the Dagger be one too?
A895779. rejoice greatly O Daughters of Zion, shout for joy O Daughter of Jerusalem; what is the matter?
A89577First, if to have a David to be our King, is such a blessednesse?
A89577If you demand what hope is there of it; or what further means may we use for the attaining of it?
A89577Thus should our souls doe; Honourable and Beloved, had you ever more cause of joy?
A89577and what i ● my people that wee should be able to offer thus willingly after this sort?
A89577how beautifull is the face of this Assembly?
A89577how great is the darknesse, where the light is turned into darknesse?
A89577how miserable are they, when the very Fountain, that should afford them comfort is Poysoned?
A89577how miserable is the body, where the very Organs of their breathing, the breath of their nostrils comes to be corrupted, or taken from them?
A89577so I would say else to all Feasters, Is Ireland undon?
A56188& c. — O poor soul, whither art thou going?
A56188( seeing their general had approved the Book, and judged the things there written to be certain, whether they are of the same mind?)
A56188But what if he be asked upon oath, whether he knew it in confession or no?
A56188But what if he be compelled to swear?
A56188Do you in earnest?
A56188Ecclesia erreret si impune& c. If the Church should offer to let Kings go unpunished, it should erre?
A56188He feedeth of ashes: a deceived heart hath turned him aside, that he can not deliver his soul, nor say, Is there not a lie in my right hand?
A56188How can men live by one another, unless they can believe what each speaks or swears to other?
A56188How may a Prince be safe in that Case?
A56188How wretchedly and fearfully must you, poor men, live?
A56188If we must lay aside all, and wait upon the Popes Oracles, how shall we be sure that he is infallible?
A56188Lord( you will say) can any men after so many Oaths and Obligations upon the Pope, or others Instigation, rebel against their lawful Soveraign?
A56188We — or do we onely?
A56188What is that?
A56188Whether these things are so?
A56188Yow will say are such things as these licensed?
A56188de S. Victoriâ, an ingenious Papist, and a learned reader of Divinity in Salamanca) if he be asked of a sin that he hath heard in confession?
A56188do they disown M ● … iana, and disclaime his doctrine?
A56188doth not our God likewise teach you, that if any man adde to his holy Word, he shall adde to him the plagues that are written in this book?
A56188happy you who need not say, Who shall go into Heaven, or Hell, or the uttermost parts of the Earth to fetch down a rule of Faith from thence?
A56188have they one Conscience at Rome, and another at Paris?
A56188how sadly will you die in that way, wherein you are sure to go through a hell to heaven?
A56188may he say that he knows not of it?
A56188say the Jesuites the clean contrary — say the Examiners; But what would you do if you were at Rome say the Jesuites?
A56188shall I fall down to the stock of a tree?
A56188they answered( that living at Rome, he could not but approve what was there approved of) But say the Parliament what think you?
A56188who knows when the Minister intends what he is about?
A56188— And what do you think would Cobham Gray& c. have done?
A56188— And yet to what pass are we brought, if we can not believe our senses?
A56188— But alas, Rome would impose upon us a Religion( shall I call it a Religion?)
A56188— But wherefore should ye, being dead with Christ from the Rudiments of the world, as though living in the world, be subject to Ordinances?
A34533And what Prince that hath cast off the Popes yoke, would willingly come under it again?
A34533And why may it not be minded by Subjects, and spoken of without any hint or thought of Rebellion?
A34533And why should the judgments of such men be rack''d, and their spirits vexed with curious scrutinies?
A34533And will the chief Shepherd at his appearing justifie this usage of his faithful Servants?
A34533But can they believe that the Church of God in these Nations, is terminated in them alone?
A34533Can a man by Subscription and Practice, allow those things which his Conscience rationally doubts to be sinful?
A34533Can nothing undo a Kingdom, but Rebellion and Treason?
A34533Doth the Lord of the Harvest command that such Labourers be thrust out of his Service?
A34533For if God hath received them, why should their fellow- servants reject or afflict them causlesly?
A34533Hath Popery its advantages to dispose Subjects to security and blind obedience?
A34533If it be said, Who shall judg what things are necessary?
A34533If the Affairs of the Commonwealth should go backwards, can the Clergy alone be at rest in their Honour, Power and Wealth?
A34533Is it their honour, strength, or safety, that such men should be numbred among their opposites?
A34533Is not Moderation and Charity far more excellent, then glorying in Opinions, Formalities, and petty matters, to the regret of many Consciences?
A34533May we mind, without offence, the event of things among us?
A34533Or that it dreads a general diffusion of knowledg in the people?
A34533Shall it be said of the English Prelacy, That it can not stand without the ejection of Thousands of Orthodox, Pious Ministers?
A34533The ancient Sacred Bonds of Fidelity, are not questioned; and if they do not, what others can oblige and awe the Conscience?
A34533Was there ever a greater Separation from the Church of England, then now is?
A34533Was there ever less satisfaction among Multitudes every where, t ● at do yet frequent her Assemblies?
A34533What can be of greater concernment to Governors, then to discern and consider the state of their people, as it is indeed?
A34533What can it avail, to disturb a People that would settle in peace, and whose Peace is accommodated to the Publick Weal, and bound up together with it?
A34533What if those that question her Injunctions, should be weak, nice and captious?
A34533What need hath the Church to enjoyn more then what is necessary to Faith and Order?
A34533Who, or what is there almost, that this or the like Latitude would not encompass, when hearty endeavours are put forth to gain men?
A34533Why will the established Clergy refuse their Brethren, and set them at such a distance?
A29535And why may it not be presumed?
A29535Are they disobedient for this?
A29535Art thou called being a Servant?
A29535Be not Righteous overmuch, neither make thy self overwise; why shouldest thou destroy thy self?
A29535But must we not only submit, but court Suffering?
A29535But tho the Jesuit had cause to be angry at this, yet why should our Historian?
A29535But yet our Historian is as angry, as if a Hare had crossed him in the way, something has happened which he thought not of, and who can help that?
A29535Can any Man be so barbarous as to blame the French Refugees for following that Rule of our Saviour?
A29535Could he think it a small thing to make his People miserable, or to be thought one that would do so?
A29535Do they sin in this?
A29535Fifthly, There is another thing, which though much less, yet may give matter of scruple; for what will not?
A29535For what could the late King wish?
A29535How Venerable and Divine is this whole Disposition and Order of Affairs?
A29535That nothing could correct or retain him?
A29535This is certainly a gross dull way of calumniating; should another imitate it, with that Indignation would he read, and despise the Author?
A29535WHAT must we do, must we be always Reading and Writing?
A29535We have forsaken all, and followed thee; what shall we have therefore?
A29535What appearance is there of Wisdom and Goodness, that is of God, in it?
A29535What if Praise and Wrath sometimes mistake their way, and the first flies to the evil and the latter to the good?
A29535What now, can we have no hopes of God''s mercy toward David?
A29535Why did he not give stop to his Proceedings when his People owned so loudly their fears of Mischief?
A29535Why did not all this noise about Passive Obedience awaken him?
A29535Why now may they not take their rest and quiet?
A29535Why then does our Author drudg and m ● yl; tire himself, and tire us, that we may have before our Eyes, a whole History of Passive Obedience?
A29535Why then does the Historian take pains to collect all these things together?
A29535Will Pens and Presses never give over?
A29535Would he be great and powerful?
A29535does he design to publish an everlasting blot upon the memory of the late King James?
A29535does he design to tell the World, that he was resolved to do mischief to his People?
A29535formidable to Enemies abroad, or Enemies at home?
A29535make it our care and business to find it?
A29535must we expose our selves to it?
A29535run upon it?
A29535what could he desire?
A50967And are Penal Laws the onely strength by which you Support the Church?
A50967Are you the only Pillar upon which the best Church in the World is Built?
A50967Do you not Attribute too much to your self in this?
A50967Does any thing of this kind Flow naturally from the King''s Declaration?
A50967Does that Engage or Incline you, or any Man else to teach any Doctrine contrary to his own Sentiment?
A50967Here is a far fetch''d Inference; How would you be understood?
A50967Is the whole, and every part of the Declaration contrary to all, and every part of your Doctrine by Law Established?
A50967Is this Intended as a Memorial of unmannerly Disobedience at First, and undutiful Carriage at Last?
A50967No more Charity, then to be Provoked to be your Enemies by it?
A50967No more Resolution then to be Discouraged by it?
A50967Of what us ● is the Rubrick to which they have Subscribed, which directs them to read what the King or their Ordnary enjoyns?
A50967You take the Declaration to be a Contradiction of the Doctrine of your Church by Law Established; In what Sence shall I take your say so?
A50967or what is that you signify, by your Resusing to Thank Him, which must now be Recompenced by Reading?
A56155And if so, whether it makes not more for Papall and Archiepiscopall, then Presbyteriall, Classicall, or Congregationall Authority?
A56155Ecclesiasticall censures either by appeales or other wayes and to what superior Tribunals?
A56155If not, how the contrary can be evidenced by cleare Scriptures, and by what texts in particular?
A56155If so, then what are these precepts, presidents, and scandalous sins in particular?
A56155c. 1. do not justifie such Commissioners to be legall as well as these texts, warrant them to be in some sort divine?
A56155since offences always use to h preceed Laws made to punish them; and, ex malis moribus optimae oriuntur leges, as all Polititians have resolved?
A34754And which of these two did Thwart the Holy Scriptures most?
A34754But Reading is Teaching: Very good; What then?
A34754But how do you know, that you judge Right in this Case now?
A34754But suppose you are right in this point, What Efficacy hath the Clergy''s Reading the King''s Declaration, to take off the Tests and Penal Laws?
A34754But what is the ground of this Jealousie?
A34754But, Why may I not then Read a Homily for Transubstantiation, or Invocation of Saints, if the King sends me such?
A34754But, are not the People Judges for themselves of what you Read?
A34754But, what is this Universal Toleration?
A34754How can you tell that?
A34754If the Order be in your Opinion Sinful, Why do you not shew, what Law of God is Broken by it?
A34754If we fall after Reading, this is the way never to Rise more: And what mean you by that?
A34754Is not this to Recommend the Clergy, as Persons of great Tenderness toward the People?
A34754Let the Question be, Whether every thing Read in the Church, be a part of Divine Service?
A34754Must the Clergy, or His Majesty judge when His Declaration is sufficiently made known?
A34754Where does the Scriptures forbid it?
A34754Who are they that thus thought formerly?
A34754had, to order the Book of Sports to be Read there?
A30606( on whom the greatnesse and glory of Spaine and Austria was most eminent and powerfull) did be not come to visit King Henry in England?
A306061. epist familia si exploratum tibi sit posse te illius regni potiri, non esse constandum: si dubium, non esse conandum, and why?
A30606And how can you assure your state not to run this hazard?
A30606And it was wisely said of King Iames in his oration to the Parliament Quis me constituit judicem inter vos?
A30606And wherefore was John of Coelen sent to Constantinople by the union?
A30606Besides, have you a blacke Prince( the mirrour of all martiall Princes) to be imployed in this expedition?
A30606But now for the lawfull authority of the Directors, whence had they their lawfull vocation and commission?
A30606But to omit all these, who can by law defend or warrant the raising of such an army against the Emperour, in the Empire, as the Palatine had?
A30606But to proceed; was their end only to releive Bohemia?
A30606But what is this to Ferdinand?
A30606For what was their project?
A30606For, cui bonos?
A30606How can this action bee justified?
A30606How violent and ignorant are these discontented Empericks, who appoint remedies worse then the disease?
A30606If you aske him, shall they march into the Palatinate?
A30606In what State then standeth he that warreth against Caesar himself, and that for his own inheritance?
A30606Is Vicarius Imperij here excepted?
A30606Is not this man in a labyrinth?
A30606Quis tribunal, illud erexerit in terris, in quo Rex de Rege, pa ● de pari judicet?
A30606What Orator then can excuse the Count Palatine, extenuate his offence, or pleade against his proscription?
A30606Wherefore did Count Hohenloe often threaten that the Turke should come in to vex their enemies?
A30606Will you make a perpetuall deadly feud with Spaine, because he can not yet therein fully satisfie you?
A30606did he not confirme their amity by the treaty of Cambr ● y, 1529?
A30606did he not make the treaties of entercourse with him, Anno 1515. and 1520?
A30606for hee wisheth a thing whereof hee hath no hope, something hee would have done, but he knoweth not what, nor how, what then?
A30606how could the power serve the turne for Frederick and be defective for Ferdinand?
A30606judge you, how can a second election and contract prejudice a precontract solemnly made and satified with all ceremonies?
A30606or the association with Holland, Denmarke, and the Duke of Bullion?
A30606or were they his Lieutenants, or Regents in his absence, or Procuratores Regni?
A30606qua spe quo concilis, would he proceed?
A30606such a Rendezevous to let in your Forces with facility, as he had in Aquitaine?
A30606whereupon did Gabor solicite the Grandvizier for aide to prosecute the warres of Hungaria?
A30606who can justlie charge him with his predecessors actions?
A374804. Who art thou that Judgest another Mans Servant?
A37480And to put on such a habbit as will Invite them in, rather then fright them out?
A37480Arch- Bishops, — Bishops, — the best Clergy, — all the best Clergy of England, — Tythes, — Vniversities, — Parish Levy''s, — Down?
A37480At which we need not wonder, for they have no promise of Infallibility; You''l say they are the Churches Representative: What then?
A37480But what have you to say to that?
A37480But what''s the end of this?
A37480For what knowest thou O Wife, whether thou shalt save thy Husband?
A37480Hast thou Faith?
A37480Here you see how he brands the poor Dissenters for the most abominable of Hereticks; and how does he prove it?
A37480How dangerously then do they expose themselves to the Just Indignation of God who drive others,( and fall themselves) into this Evil?
A37480How widely different is the manner of Preaching in the Apostles time from Philosophical Arguing, and Rhetorical declaiming?
A37480If this Blessed Counsel were but followed, what a happy Nation might ours be?
A37480Is this a comfortable Bargain?
A37480Or how knowest thou O Man, whether thou shalt save thy Wife?
A37480Or that he stands in need of Spiritual Privy Council, to Regulate and Establish the Circumstances of his Lordship?
A37480Or, being Men of Conscience, will not be led by any Implicite Faith?
A37480There is one Law- giver( saies he) who is able to save and to destroy: Who art thou that Judgest another?
A37480This is most sad indeed, — but wherein I pray?
A37480Well then, supposing them weak Brethren, what shall we do with them?
A37480What can be more Pious and Consonant to the Rules of the Gospel, then what this Great Monarch here declares?
A37480What wise and Loving Father would put on a winding Sheet to Fright his weak and simple Child?
A37480Whether it be not an Impeachment of the Divine Wisdom, to suppose his Laws imperfect?
A37480Whether they,( that is such as prosecute the Protestant Dissenters,) would be so dealt withal themselves?
A37480Why is the Christian Religion ever the worse for this?
A37480Why pray what Course will you take with your Dissenting Brother?
A37480Why?
A37480or put him upon a Rack to stretch him to his own dimension, if not so tall as he?
A32788And that any of the Clergy should be made Justice of the Peace, or Officer of State( as indeed, who so fit to keep Love and Peace among Neighbours?
A32788Can they make Agreement between Publick- Faith Debts, and Bishops Lands, and Delinquents Estates?
A32788Can they secure a Rebell against a King in Power?
A32788Did ever any Popish Jesuite so revile the Clergy of England?
A32788Henry the 8th begat the policy, to whose Lust and Tyranny how soon did the Parliament turn Pander?
A32788Should Bishops come in again, what shall become of our Moneys for the purchase of their Land?
A32788That Episcopacy was an Enemy to Parliaments, and to the Laws of the Land: How proved think you?
A32788There was another sin of the Clergy as much talked of, that was, forsooth, The Pride of the Clergy, what was that?
A32788Vsque quo, Domine?
A32788What also was the sin of the Archbishop and the Earl of Strafford?
A32788What else have the causeless clamours of the Fanaticks meant for this many years against the Bishops and the Clergy of England?
A32788What shall become of their Ordinance- Law?
A32788Yet this vox populi must choose our Religion, and Religion- makers: but who gave the people power to choose?
A32788[ 3], 36 p. Re- printed in the year 1681, and are to be sold by Walter Davis...,[ London]:[ 1681] BM gives note:[ By Chestlin?].
A32788it was replyed by a boy- Member of that Committee, Will ye suffer him( meaning the Doctor) to answer by questions?
A32788will ye know the reason thereof?
A678712. Who shall be the Judge that shall Convict for Heresie?
A67871But had you no other time( saith he) to do it but in such a time?
A67871By what Law is it that a man is burnt for Heresie, the Common Law, or by the Canon Law, called, in our books, the Law of the Church?
A67871By what Law is it, Common or Canon, that an Heretick, after conviction, shall be burnt?
A67871If this were Law, how many Scholers would at this day be burnt for Hereticks?
A67871Quia sequitur in fine legis Regiae quae de imperio ejus lataest?
A67871Reader, Had you nothing else to do but to Read against the Clergy?
A67871The Historian goeth on and saith, His Third Case thus, Whether a Bishop, without calling a Synod, hath power as Diocesan, to convict an Heretick?
A67871The Historian goeth on and saith, the second Case thus, If any benificed Clerk was capable of Temporal Jurisdiction at the making of that Law?
A67871The second Question, and which fully decides the point of my Case, is this, Who shall be Judge in the conviction of an Heretick?
A67871WHether an Heretick may, at this day, be Convicted and Condemned for Heresie by his own Ordinary alone?
A67871WHether at the time of making my Statute 25 E. 3. a. Beneficed Clerk might by Law exercise Civil Jurisdiction, and be a Justice of Peace?
A67871What Fees were due to Pursevants, Clerks, Registers, or other Officers imployed in such Ecclesiastical Commissions?
A67871What shall be said such an Heresie for which a man shall be condemned to the fire?
A67871What was the forme and manner of proceeding in those Ecclesiastical Commissions?
A67871What was the nature of the Oath, Ex Officio, which was used upon some of those Ecclesiastical Commissions?
A67871When the first Ecclesiastical Commissioners went forth?
A67871Whereupon I desisted, remembring that of Solomon, In the word of a King there is power, and who may say unto him, What dost thou?
A67871Whether an Act of Parliament may pass, all the Spiritual Lords absenting themselves from the House of Peers?
A67871Whether for all those enormous offences of which they have Cognisance and Iurisdiction by the Letters Patents, they can fine and imprison?
A67871Whether the H. Commission ought not in their sentence to have expressed the particular offences, and not to say in general enormous offences?
A67871Whether the High Commission can Fine and Imprison for all enormous offences, or only some?
A67871Whether the High Commission can inflict this punishment, or any part of it, but for high and enormous offences?
A67871Whether the proper Diocesan, according to the opinion of this Civilian, and other Civilians agreeing with him?
A67871and what those are?
A67871c. 1 for Fining and Imprisoning for enormous offences, belongeth to the Kings Temporal Judges, or to the Judges Ecclesiastical?
A966861647?]
A96686And if any think wee doe needlesly ingage in the troubles betweene the Indians?
A96686And then hee demanded of the Court if hee should have equity and justice in his cause or no?
A96686And wherefore doe you murmure among your selves at this saying, thinking it is not a Christian expression?
A96686Being asked why they spake against the Ordinances of the Ministery, Sacraments,& c. seeing the Scripture allowes them?
A96686Being further demanded what he then thought of that Christ in whom we beleeve, borne of the Virgin Mary, and who suffered under Pontius Pilate?
A96686For wee aske you who was the cause of Mistresse Hutchinson her departure from amongst you, was it voluntarie?
A96686If it bee objected, is it possible that any men should bee so grosly blind and wicked, as to abolish all ministration of Justice and righteousnesse?
A96686Now if any would know how it was done?
A96686Then they were demanded, if they did acknowledge this charge to be just, and would submit to it, or what exception they had against it?
A96686To which Gorton answered I know not whether you have any eares or no?
A96686What shall be given unto thee, or what shall be done unto thee thou false tongue?
A96686Who but publique persons should take notice of publique insolencies?
A96686Who knowes not that they can not write?
A96686and who knowes not their owne answers from those that come under your hands?
A96686and your law banisheth them?
A96686are these guiltie and vile persons, out of whose hands( by the power of your ministries) you are delivering and releasing the world?
A96686are these the people you honour your selves withall?
A96686so do you, Doe I sit, or speake here, as a brother?
A34543And was this Capacity any where restrained to the Presbyterians?
A34543Are they jealous that the Structure of their Government may be weakned, and at length dissolved?
A34543As for the objected unprofitableness of their returning, how doth it appear?
A34543Because All Truths have been disputed, doth it follow, that there are no indisputable Truths?
A34543But hath the French King less assurance of the Loyalty of His Protestant Subjects, then of the Roman- Catholicks?
A34543But is this person consistent with himself?
A34543But who best knows their hearts, themselves or their Adversaries?
A34543But why doth he say, If the Papists have any such Doctrines?
A34543Can it be necessary to the Church''s Peace, to exclude or deprive men for such Differences in which neither Faith nor Order are concerned?
A34543Can men of sound minds and temperate spirits, believe this?
A34543Did Prelacy ever effect the like Unity in the Church of England?
A34543Doth he not know they have?
A34543Had Presbytery the Strength of the Civil Power?
A34543How then could a man of reason draw such hideous Inferences from that Position?
A34543If Episcopacy yeeld to a Moderate Course, why should any prudent Dissenters go about to molest it?
A34543If some offer to disturb the Peace, can no Rule of Government restrain them?
A34543If these and other Varieties, be no reproach to our Church, will it reproach her to suffer one to Officiate with a Surpliss, and another without it?
A34543Is a Can not for Conscience sake, of no more force than a bare Will not?
A34543Is there any Justice or Charity in such dealing?
A34543May not the Church salve her Honour, by declaring, That in remitting these Injunctions, she meerly yeelds to the infirmity of weak Consciences?
A34543One may well ask, Where is the Truth and Candor of those men that write after this manner?
A34543Or is Toleration the reason of a standing Army in the United Provinces of the Netherlands?
A34543Or was it ever formed in England?
A34543That such Condescention and Clemency should be used on the One side, and such Humility and Modesty on the Other, why should it seem impossible?
A34543Was it not crush''d while it was an Embryo, by the prevailing Potency of its Adversaries?
A34543What hinders their Capacity of gaining Benefices, yea and Dignities, if they could Conform?
A34543What human Authority can warrant any one to put in practice an unlawful or suspected Action, or to make profession of a known or suspected Falshood?
A34543What manner of arguing is this?
A34543Why should they not find as good acceptation as others, in their Preaching and Conversation?
A34543Yea, how great a Rent would be made by it through the whole Fabrick of this Church?
A85382And how doth he prove this?
A85382But what may the Gentleman mean by his, Impertinency?
A85382For then, wherein should the light of the Scriptures themselves, exceed the light of Nature, in that important affair of Christian Religion?
A85382For what Laws against false Worship and Idolatry, can he produce, or instance, the making whereof was taught by the Law of Nature?
A85382For what Nation is there so great, who hath God so nigh unto them c?
A85382For what edition of the Book of Nature hath Mr Goodwin published, that comes forth in a just volume?
A85382How doth the man wring the nose of his Premisses to force the blood of this Conclusion from it?
A85382If therfore the light which is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness?
A85382Or is it such a Wonder, how he that doth weakly once, should at any time after do more wisely?
A85382Or what hath he ever said, or written, that administreth so much as any tolerable occasion, colour, or pretence, for such a saying?
A85382yea or such, concerning which he thinks himself most assured that they are erroneous?
A254592. Who are the Good Men?
A25459And Zadock will be ● nay, must be at Solomons( Coronation, shall I call it?)
A25459And was not Solomon a Preacher in Jerusalem?
A25459And where shal love be, if not in these two titles?
A25459Another being questioned what City was strongest?
A25459Authority by taking part with the home spoon quarrels of the other sex?
A25459Both Greeks, Latines, and Hebrews, had their Aediles, Cereales, Overseers, shall I call them Clerks of the Mercat?
A25459But to what purpose are these or any other Laws?
A25459But who hath believed our Report?
A25459For what hath Clinas, I mean the Coward, in him, deserving to be chosen for wearing of a Sword?
A25459For, what could hinder prosperity and peace, when Kings respected Church- men, and Church- men honoured Kings, and both in sig ● t of the People?
A25459GOD or the People?
A25459How Scandalous to our Religion?
A25459How much more should he shew Virility even among m ● n?
A25459How unfit is it in our Saviors eye to wash his Apostles feet( a servile office) with his upper Garment( a Teachers Habit?)
A25459If GOD, why then will he make a Golden Calf to please them?
A25459If Job the poor, was Joabab the Prince, how shall we think that that King did not Teach?
A25459If with the Historian, there were two Tables of Stone, upon which Adam writ,( Shall I say his Bible?)
A25459Is not Aaron the Levite thy Brother?
A25459It is a Name from his being preserved, and drawn forth from the water, and now shal I say to Pharaohs Daughter, Understands thou what thou doest?
A25459Make this Question in the worst of times, Whom should the Priest of the moct High GOD please?
A25459Shall we think Cornelius did not thus teach his Band?
A25459The King by a pillar of the house of the Lord, and the Priests round about him, and the people rejoycing to see both?
A25459The remembrance of which and such other passages, how competently, as to the memory, would they qualifie a Judge?
A25459Their Dearness: Can it be imagined, that ever any man hated his own honour, that understood it?
A25459Thus Solomon publickly helped to Consecrat the Temple; and ou ● late Solomon King James, gave( shall I call them?)
A25459What is that Mans Name, and what is his Sons Name?
A25459What more?
A25459When can Aaron want his Moses?
A25459Why are Judges called gods?
A25459Will not God love his Priest, and shall not the Priest love his God?
A25459against the Gates, that is, against the Magistrates of this Honourable Burgh?
A25459and again, when can Moses want his Aaron, that is, the King his Priest?
A25459if the People, why do ye call your selves Gods Priests?
A25459nor Boaz his Family?
A25459or the great Counsellours, Na ● hanael and Nicodemus?
A25459or to come more closs to the Objection, who is the wicked Magistrate?
A25459or where are the Good Works?
A25459was not the Priest hood precious think you to King Melchisedec?
A61870& quis Apostolicae praedicationis vetet formam?
A61870And why may not Christianity admit the same thing, if it be practised with sobriety and reverence?
A61870Are the Scriptures so immured up there, that they are banished from their proper place?
A61870Displicet unquam in Synodo Nicena Homusion esse susceptum?
A61870For what is a man profited if he shall gain the whole world, and loose his own soul?
A61870Hoc tandem rogo quis Episcopis jubeat?
A61870In the vulgar Latine?
A61870In what language must this promulgation be made?
A61870Must we all turn Nicodemus''s?
A61870Or how was not Arianisme of old, how is not the Council of Trent now true?
A61870Quid profuit?
A61870Quàm graves bonorum Regum ac Principum quaerelae sint saepe auditae, statum Ecclesiae suis temporibus lamentantium?
A61870Si piè susceptum est, cur venit constitutio pietatis in crimen, quae impietatem piè per ea ipsa quibus impiabatur extinxit?
A61870Th''old Patriarchs age, and not their hapiness too, Why does hard fate to us restore?
A61870Tu cur Pias excludis?
A61870What irreligion can there be in applying some Scripture- expressions to Naturall things?
A61870Where is that exceeding great, and hyperbolical grace of God, by which true converts are induced unto, and fixed in the Christian Religion?
A61870Who are they that pretend to forsake the Churches corruptions, and not her external Communion?
A61870Why are not the one rather exalted and purified, then the other defiled by such applications?
A61870Why did Christ dispute with the Doctors in the temple, both hearing them, and asking questions?
A61870Why did he pray of God for any more, then that he would make them good Grammar- scholars, and give them a common apprehension?
A61870Why does Love''s fire thus to Mankind renew, What the Flood wash''d away before?
A61870if a common apprehension be that according to which controversies of faith must be decided?
A61870or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
A61870what mean those argumentations in the word of God, by which the principal points of our Religion are evinced?
A61870what of justification, mediator, imputed righteousness, Grace, new birth, and regeneration, and many such words, that have a place in our Confession?
A61870when the obligation of the Law ceaseth?
A61870who must be the judge of words ordinary; some words being ordinary with the learned, which are not so to the ignorant and illiterate?
A61870why did Paul dispute at Athens with the Iews and devout persons, and sometimes in the school of Tyrannus?
A61870why did he argue with the Sadduces about the resurrection?
A50949And must tradition then ever thus to the worlds end be the perpetuall cankerworme to eat out Gods Commandements?
A50949And wherin consists this fleshly wisdom and pride?
A50949Are the feet so beautifull, and is the very bringing of these tidings so decent of it self?
A50949But how O Prelats should you remove schisme, and how should you not remove and oppose all the meanes of removing schism?
A50949But is heer the utmost of your outbraving the service of God?
A50949But is not the type of Priest taken away by Christs comming?
A50949But what if ye prevent, and hinder all good means of preventing schisme?
A50949But where, O Bishop, doth the purpose of the law set forth Christ to us as a King?
A50949Doe they keep away schisme?
A50949For if I be either by disposition, or what other cause too inquisitive, or suspitious of my self and mine own doings, who can help it?
A50949For if there were no opposition where were the triall of an unfai ● d goodnesse and magnanimity?
A50949How shall a man know to do himselfe this right, how to performe this honourable duty of estimation and respect towards his own soul and body?
A50949Secondly, how the Church- government under the Gospell can be rightly call''d an imitation of that in the old Testament?
A50949What are their opinions?
A50949What can be gather''d hence but that the Prelat would still sacrifice?
A50949What could be done more for the healing and reclaming that divine particle of Gods breathing the soul, and what could be done lesse?
A50949What is there in the world can measure men but discipline?
A50949What need I instance?
A50949What sects?
A50949What think ye Reade ●, do ye not understand him?
A50949What will they do then in the name of God and Saints, what will these man- haters yet with more despight and mischiefe do?
A50949Where are those schismaticks with whom the Prelats hold such hot skirmish?
A50949Where then should we begin to extinguish a rebellion that hath his cause from the misgovernment of the Church, where?
A50949Where then?
A50949and lastly what could have beene more necessary then to have written it for our instruction?
A50949and what could have made the remedy more available, then to have us''d it speedily?
A50949and whose eye could have found the fittest remedy sooner then his?
A50949in being altogether ignorant of God and his worship?
A50949is not a farre more perfect worke more agreeable to his perfection in the most perfect state of the Church militant, the new alliance of God to man?
A50949shew us your acts, those glorious annals which your Courts of loathed memory lately deceas''d have left us?
A50949what new decency then can be added to this by your spinstry?
A50949would he preferre those proud simoniacall Courts?
A47305And having still their Episcopal and Ministerial Powers,''t is next to be considered, whether they stand bound to exercise and make use thereof?
A47305And how are they Fellow- labourers, if at such times, whilst he holds on Labouring, they give it off?
A47305And how should they tell it, but in the discharge of their Ministrations?
A47305And is any Failure or Falshood, more Fatal, as well as more inexcusable, than theirs would be in this Case?
A47305And supposing the Schism, what is to be done by the People in this case?
A47305And then, how shall a mere command of state, dissolve the tye made by him, or break communion betwixt their Bishop and them?
A47305And what is the hinderance, of exercising the same still in those dioceses, and among that Kings Subjects?
A47305And who else, but the Bishops of the several Churches, should be capable to grant these Letters?
A47305And who shall tell them this, but his own Messengers?
A47305Are they barr''d from such Communion, by such mixtures?
A47305But in pressing the consideration thereof upon particular persons, or parties, for prevention, or redress, it is to be enquired, first, who makes it?
A47305Do not we all own that, to be one of the greatest Banes to Religion, and a most sinful and mischievous thing?
A47305For great purposes,( and what will be alleadged greater, than preventing a total want of publick worship and Ministerial Offices?)
A47305How are they true to the part of Co- workers, if they withdraw their Ministrations, and leave and let him alone to do all the Work himself?
A47305How many there, are like to be drawn into the snare, and how loud will the Blood of those Souls cry, who are caught therein?
A47305It was allowable, to serve the spiritual wants of the offenders: Can it be less so, to serve those of innocent men?
A47305Lovest thou me?
A47305Should not the Shepheards Feed their Flocks?
A47305That will shew who ought to mend it; but if they will not, it may be enquired next, who else can cure it?
A47305What is the one Body,* saith St Chrysostom on the words of St. Paul, there is one Body?
A47305What is to be done by spiritually minded and mortified Men, who are raised above this World, and prefer God and Religion before themselves?
A47305Yet what will you say, if such Ministration must unavoidably make, or keep up a Schism?
A47305est, quod fine satisfactione fidei communionem tuam subiremus?
A47305the Unrighteous Petitions, or sinful Matter of the Prayers, which are offered up to God therein?
A47854And are not the People poisoned the same way This Year, that they were the Last?
A47854And did not this specious Flourish conclude in a Total Extinction of Law, Freedom, and Government?
A47854And is the Hierarchy the Cause of all our Miseries?
A47854And quarrel any other Law, nay, one after another, the whole Body of the Law, as well as That?
A47854And what came of it?
A47854And what is Religion the better for all this?
A47854And when they are once tainted with that deadly Iealousie, who can blame them again, for doing Ill Things, that know no better?
A47854Are These now the Works of the Gospel?
A47854Are not the same Artifices of Libelling Authority practised Now, which were Then?
A47854But I hear many people say, that''t is True, the Law provides well enough for us; but what if Iustice be overaw''d and obstructed?
A47854But are we so Miserable then?
A47854But let us put the Case now, that a Prince mis- governs: How shall he be tried?
A47854But still these Oppressions are Illegal every way; and the Question is Now, what Legal Relief in the Case?
A47854But the point in hand however is This: First, What is intended by the Tyranny here spoken of?
A47854Does he consider, that after This Violence, an Englishman hath nothing left him that is sure and sacred?
A47854Generals, Majors, and Lieutenant Generals, Plunderers, Sequestrators, Decimators, Regicides, and Sacrilegious Vsurpers set up in their stead?
A47854How would it be taken?
A47854If the Former, where is the Law that says, The People may call their Soveraign to accompt, in case he does not Govern according to Law?
A47854If there may be as good Preachers and Subjects on the One side, as on the Other; why should we change the Government, to be onely where we were?
A47854In short; Is not High- gate the way to St- Albans Still?
A47854Is not Money drawn into a few hands here, as well as there; and Their abundance, consequently, the Cause of Our Want?
A47854Or if a Body would draw up a Systeme of Treason and Sedition; must he go to the Publisher of Bacons Government, for a License?
A47854Or why should not an Ecclesiastical Body have its Dignities and Dependences, as well as a Civil Community?
A47854Pray what did we get by it; when to be cased of This insupportable Tyranny, the Nation was at the charge of 114000 l. a Moneth to an Army?
A47854Secondly, How are we to behave our selves, in Case of such Tyranny?
A47854The Second Question is, Are these Officers established by Law, or not?
A47854There hath been always This Clamour against their Courts; But how was it with us, when they were put down?
A47854To be as brief as possible: First, Where is the Crime, or the Iniquity of all This Pomp and State?
A47854Was it not a Blessed Exchange now, to be freed from the Prelatical Tyranny, and their Retinue, and to have such Gospel- Ministers?
A47854Was not This the very Charge upon the late King?
A47854Was not the Care of the Protestant Religion, pretended; and was not all Religion, in a manner, subverted?
A47854Was not the Kings Honour, and Safety, the Pretext of a Solemn Covenant?
A47854Was there not a Time when St. Pauls was turned into a Garrison?
A47854Well, and what of all this?
A47854Were not the same Arguments used Then as Now?
A47854What a Cramp to Learning, and Industry?
A47854What a Scandal is this to the Commonwealth of Letters?
A47854What is the fruit at last of all our Wild Adventures?
A47854When Apprentices cancelled their own Indentures, and had them renewed again by an Ordinance?
A47854Why should such a Lord, Gentleman, Merchant,& c. have so many Hundred Thousand Pounds a Year amongst them; and the Poor ready to sterve?
A47854Would they be in the days of Queen Elizabeth again; or of King Iames; or of the Late King?
A47854and was he not delivered up by the Same Covenant, to his very Executioners?
A47854and was there ever any Prince that lived more faultless?
A47854but Bondage, Beggery, Shame, and Late Repentance?
A47854but do you think( they cry) that These Godly People will ever touch the King?
A44838& c?
A44838And do they agree with the Servants of Christ, or one with another,( all speaking the same things?)
A44838And what was this for, but the obtaining of their ends by the first Way of Rome, or the other of Scotland?
A44838And who since have prevailed with, and misled their late Great Benefactor and Protector, and those with him, untill he also fell?
A44838Doth any unclean thing come near his dwelling?
A44838Doth the Lord God change?
A44838From whence, and by whose Ordination, Concurrence and Agreement( in the late Kings reign) were the then Altars?
A44838Learn to labour, and live like other men; This is an hard saying, who can bear it?
A44838Must we lose all, part with all, or not be Christs Disciples?
A44838Need I yet further remember you how some of them have strugled for, and got Augmentations to their former Benefices?
A44838Or did he or his Ministers at any time so seek to destroy mens lives?
A44838Was not your fire hereby kindled, unto which the Authors have ever since been adding Fuel of one kind or other, to this very day?
A44838Whether the said men are taught by, and come to you in the Wisdom, Will, Power and Authority of God, or of man?
A44838Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean?
A44838and are the Branches sweet, and the Fruit good Food for nourishment?
A44838and is it not evident, that they who can so far prevail, as to have set up again, and pulled down?
A44838and who in like manner lull''d asleep, and misled the Parliament severall times, untill,& c?
A44838or did not Christ Jesus come to destroy the works of the Devil, and bring in an eversasting Rrighteousnesse?
A44838or did they not rather wait for other oppertunities wherein the Lord by his wise providence prevented them sundry times?
A44838or do changes in Governours or Governments alter his mind, or the way of his Worship and Service?
A44838or is his fear truly taught by the Precepts of men, or are his Ministers subject to changes, as Governments change?
A44838or who occasioned such sidings, making Parties, and causing enmity in each against other?
A44304And whether the blood of our Countrey- men, should have been cast away in such uncertain terms?
A44304And yet, were these Quarrellers reproved for withdrawing from the general Assembly upon that account?
A44304Are they able to shew that every ecclesiastical Meeting or Judicatory hath, by a dvine scriptural Right, a priviledge to choose their own Moderator?
A44304Doth it not become Subjects to go as far on in obedience to lawfull Authority, as they see they may without sin against God?
A44304Hath not the Supreme Magistrate( even according to their own principles) an undoubted power to convocate Synods when he sees it needfull?
A44304Is it the want of liberty to choose a Moderator?
A44304It will be said, What is the sin?
A44304May not much of this be applyed to the present Withdrawers from concurrence in necessary duties?
A44304Or, Is it that he that presides, is a Bishop, and claims more power then they can allow, more then they think is due, as of a negative voice?
A44304Or, Is it the want of unpreaching Elders in the Meeting?
A44304Or, that people would have yielded to the ambitious courses of Pastors?
A44304Should not that reproof be taken home in the present case, by such as withdraw from Meetings of the Chruch?
A44304Was it sound Doctrine to insinuat( to the sense of intelligent men) that we were not otherwise bound to defend Him?
A44304Was there not more policy then piety in this, to endeavour the soldering and holding fast of so many several parties united against Episcopacy?
A44304What ground could they have for separation from the Synod?
A44304Where is there any Precept for this?
A44304Who can have a lawfull power to swear all the Kings subjects to such a purpose, without his consent?
A44304or any example of such election in Scripture?
A44304or what peace for people?
A44304or, if it be unlawful so to do?
A44304why should there be divers weights, and divers measures used in such parity of cases?
A561672 It may be questioned, whether the Independent way he there so earnestly pleads for, be the way of Christ, or not?
A56167All wise men hold preventing Physicke best for their bodies, states, and why not for their souls and Churches?
A56167Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?
A56167Are there no corrupt or drunken members in your independent churches, but onely reall visible Saints?
A56167But O then why seperate you from us, yea passe uncharitable censures on us as if we were not your Brethren?
A56167Episcopall, or Presbyteriall Churches, as well as Independent; or of Independent onely?
A56167If church- government be suited to States, whether Politicians are not more fit to consult about establishing it?
A56167If no prescript forme( of church- government) in the Word, why not Episcopacy( especially regulated and moderated) as well as Presbytery?
A56167Is infallibility annexed onely to your private Chaires, conventicles?
A56167Nay, why was the Tabernacle altered into a* Temple, different from it?
A56167Shall nothing binde in any Churches, but what is unanimously voted nemine contradicente?
A56167Thirdly, How( I pray) doe you hold your selves accountable to every neighbour Church?
A56167Why is an Assembly of Divines called to search the Word about it?
A56167Will you throw away all the Apple because one part of it only is rotten?
A56167and why did the second* Temple vary from the first, and that in the self same Church and Nation?
A56167as some mist ● … it) without, yea against both Law& Gospel for ought they yet have made appeare?
A56167by way of subordination, correction or just appeal?
A56167or reject Communion with the best of men because they have some infirmities?
A56167or shall one or two dissenting voices over- rule the rest or not be bound by the most?
A56167or the best strong waters out of the vilest Lees; the richest Minerals out of the coursest earth?
A56167that I am certain you will deny: or only by way of voluntary information and satisfaction, when required, which I conceive you mean?
A56167the most orient Pearles out of the basest Oisters?
A56167will it not produce many more troubles, dangers, wars, schisms, then we have hitherto felt?
A269142. Who would you have to be Judge in this matter?
A26914And if Princes and people will believe all this, and will be deceived, and will voluntarily subject themselves to such an Usurper, who can help it?
A26914And if horning, or Writs de Excommunicato Capiendo, or imprisonment, or burning men as Hereticks follow this, all this is the Magistrates own doing?
A26914And is not all this enough to satisfie you, that we claim no part of the Magistrates Office?
A26914And what would you or any man have more?
A26914And who will trouble the Church unnecessarily about words and names?
A26914And would they not encrease this pollution that would have the most vicious to be equally received with the best?
A26914Are not such regular proceedings necessary even in Cases of meer arbitration?
A26914Be not righteous over much; neither make thy self over wise: why shouldst thou destroy thy self?
A26914But how shall men be heard, if they be not cited?
A26914Can you sh ● w their Interest plainlier than all this?
A26914Do you think this is not plain dealing enough, if men are willing to understand?
A26914Etiamne Equisoni suo subjectus Rex?
A26914Etiamre medico?
A26914For what dishonour is it for a man to be subject to his Maker and Redeemer?
A26914For who will have a Co- partner with him in his Kingdom, that may choose?
A26914Hath not all Christs Church exercised such a Discipline as I have described since the Apostles days till now?
A26914How shall such things be Justly and Regularly, transacted, if there be not a known Time and Place, and if Accusers and Witnesses be not summoned?
A26914If Rulers will make such Laws, and if they will so far be Executioners of the Clergies Decrees, who can hinder them?
A26914If it be, how can our Religion be good?
A26914If it be, with whom shall the ignorant trust the conduct of their souls, that will not make merchandize of them?
A26914If not — If you would, it must be such a difference as Christ hath appointed us to make?
A26914If not, why should you think that others will not be as just and impartial as you would be?
A26914If you say, Why then did you not forbear a work so ungrateful?
A26914In such cases which must you conform to and obey?
A26914Is it not the wickedness of Christians that is the chief hardening of Turks and other Infidels against Christianity?
A26914Is not Faith for Holiness, and did not Christ come to purifie a peculiar people, and restore us to the Image of God?
A26914Is the Office so malignant to infect all that undertake it?
A26914Nay, what greater honour can there be?
A26914Or all the Bishops of Christendome without exception, were ever present at any Council?
A26914Or is not Reformation a righter way than extirpation, of Discipline as well as of Doctrine and Worship?
A26914Or shall he whom by mis- information you refuse or reject from your family or service, become your houshold servant in despight of you?
A26914Shall every one be Judge himself?
A26914Shall they force themselves into our familiarity or communion in spight of us?
A26914The Bishop commandeth you to use a Ceremony, or to keep a holy day, and your Parents forbid it you?
A26914Undoubtedly they give away more of their own Interest hereby, than you have opened?
A26914What if the Magistrate, Minister, and Parents have opposite Commands?
A26914What impudency then is it in these men to challenge me to prove, and yet overlook my proof?
A26914Where they have no profit, no preterment, no man- pleasing, no worldly honour to invite them?
A26914Whether it be convenient for the King to make Church- men Magistrates, or not?
A26914Which of them is to be obeyed?
A26914Who can administer on these terms?
A26914Who had not rather Rule alone, than divide his Kingdom with the Pope?
A26914Who were the Judges of the Capacity of persons to be baptized, or the desert of persons to be rejected?
A26914Whom do you think Christ committed this business to?
A26914Would you be partial and false to the Truth of Christ your self, if you were the Pastor of a Church?
A26914Would you have any difference made between the Christian Church and the Pagan and Infidel world?
A26914Yea, where it is like to diminish their gain, to hinder them from preferment, to make them hated by most on whom their discipline is exercised?
A26914doth the Jansenist himself therefore disclaim all Temporal Power in the Church, or is he just to Kings?
A26914e. g. The Magistrate bids you meet in one place for publick Worship; the Bishop in another, and the Parent in a third?
A33745And being so, what Excuse can there be, why they did not read it?
A33745And do''s his Majesty less than acknowledge it in this Declaration?
A33745And if the Loyalty of the Church of England receive any blemish by it, what can she say, but that she was wounded in the House of her Friends?
A33745And now, when our troubl''d Waters had begun to settle again, what need of whistling up the Winds for another Storm?
A33745And ought not their Practise now, to have made good their Principles?
A33745And the Rents of Lands fallen?
A33745And what greater Assay to it can there be, than Disobedience?
A33745And what is that, but a dispensing with it?
A33745And what would Henry the Eighth have done in such a Case; made use of his last Argument, or thrown up the Game for a few cross Cards?
A33745And why?
A33745But supposing it a matter only cognisable in Parliament, why could not they have held till then, and in the mean time obey''d?
A33745He has in the Word of a King secur''d to them their Religion, Possessions and Properties; And why?
A33745He has pledg''d his Royal Word, and shall we doubt the Truth of it?
A33745No?
A33745No?
A33745Or how then could the Convocation be concern''d in it?
A33745Or that Advice of the present Bishop of Ely to the Church of England, to have been consider''d, and follow''d?
A33745Or that to read any thing in the House of God, is declaring my Consent to it?
A33745Or what made the Jews who had so often acknowledg''d our Savior, turn head against him, and crucifie him?
A33745Or why are they so averse from having them eas''d at present?
A33745That our Neighbors have gotten into our Manufacture?
A33745That our Ships are not so well Mann''d as formerly?
A33745The King has said it, and shall he not perform it?
A33745The Question answers it self: And if the Power of Dispensing with Penal Laws, were not inseparably and unalterably in Him; how could he have done it?
A33745Then why was it not comply''d with?
A33745Vide, utrum Tunica filii tui sit, an non?
A33745What made the Nobles break the Yoak?
A33745What made the People set up Adoniah against David''s disposition of the Crown to Solomon?
A33745What makes us complain of the want of Trade?
A33745Why then have those Penal Laws been executed with so much rigor against them?
A33745c. 1. for using the Common- Prayer in the Vulgar Tongue only: what is meant by it, but that the Queen might lawfully dispense with that Statute?
A33745or must the Kingdom of Heaven be confin''d to a Party?
A43528Also, What is the cause, that she at this present time, rather then at any other heretofore, doth submit her selfe?
A43528And What need all this waste?
A43528And then to what a miserable Extremity must his Death have brought Her?
A43528And then what fitter husband ● ould be found out for her, than Philip Prince of Spain?
A43528And what a mad Blindness is it, for the avoidance of an uncertain Danger, to precipitate Our selves into a most certain Destruction?
A43528And who could tell, but that it might descend on Her self at last?
A43528Besides, how will you provide for great Parishes where a thousand people are,& c?
A43528But how?
A43528De varietate Rerum, did contain?
A43528For what could more secure the interess of the Queen of Scots, than to corroborate her own Title with that of Darnly?
A43528For what did follow hereupon, but a continual multiplying of Disorders in all Parts of this Church?
A43528Have I so long Commanded him, who Commands two Kingdoms?
A43528Miraris Janam Graio Sermone loquutam?
A43528Or that any Bagpipers, Horse coursers, Jaylers, or Ale basters, were admitted then into the Clergy, without good and long tryal of their conversation?
A43528Quis enim potuit compensare beneficia tua erga me?
A43528The King rejoyned, How can that be done without a subject?
A43528Then to come to the Apostles, where did you ever read that in their external behaviour, they did wear Frocks or Gowns, or four- cornered Caps?
A43528What cause( sayd he) is that?
A43528Where singing is used, what shall we say to the case of the people, that kneel in the body of the Church?
A43528Whether if the Writ of Melius inquirendum be sent forth, there be any likelyhood that it will return to the Queens profit?
A43528Whether some Benefices ratably be not less than they be already valued?
A43528Whether the Mass be a sacrifice propitiat ● ry, for the sins of the quick and the dead?
A43528Whether the na ● ural body and blood of Christ be really in the Sacrament, after the words spoken by the Priest, or no?
A43528Which, what else was it,( as they said) but the committing so much Heavenly Treasure unto R ● tten Vessels?
A43528and what pleasure can be took in Power if no use be made of it?
A43528of that month, Weston then sitting with the ● e ● t in the nature of Judges, by whom they were demanded, whether they would subscribe or not?
A43528or did wear Copes of Tiss ● e or Velvet?
A43528or that a company of Lay- men- servants did follow them all in one Livery?
A43528or that at their Prayers they sa ● e in sides, or lay on the ground, or fell prostrate, or sung Te Deum, or looked toward the South?
A43528the trusting so much Excellent 〈 ◊ 〉 to such Musty B ● ttles?
A17981And could any other power but the power and protection of God preserue a Land from so many, so deadly dangers?
A17981And was not this a great worke of God?
A17981And what can the serpent his seed doe more?
A17981And what cause haue our adu ● rsaries to examine themselues, and more narrowly to examine the cause which God by so many iudgements hath condemned?
A17981And what hath beene their practise, but to bring great personages and great houses to ruine?
A17981And what is that seed of Roman religion, but the seed of Rebellion?
A17981And will they neuer vnderstand that they who practise such things can not inherit the Kingdome of God?
A17981Are not these the seed of the serpent?
A17981But can our aduersaries take any comfort in their doings?
A17981But can our adversaries doe the like, whose practises against these noble Princes, were wicked and malicious, and by God confounded?
A17981But he was drunke with the cup of Rome; for who would run such courses but drunken men?
A17981But if they were wise, they would first inquire whether there be a change or no?
A17981But now consider who oppugne vs?
A17981But when the accompt is cast vp; what haue all the aduersaries of England got in the end?
A17981But when this Verse was disliked, as seeming too plaine: for it, they set in place these wordes: Quorsum haec alió properantibus?
A17981But where are those darke places of the earth which are full of the habitation of the cruell, as the Prophet saith?
A17981Campian was demanded whether he tooke Queene Elizabeth to be Queene of England by right and law?
A17981Can the seed of the serpent proceed more maliciously, more cruelly, more deeply in bloud then these haue done?
A17981Can they deny that the Pope hath runne the course of false Balaam against vs?
A17981Can they deny that wee haue the Oracles of God among vs, onely reuerencing them?
A17981Can they deny the miraculous pro ● ● ction of God ouer vs from time to time, against all their wicked practises?
A17981Doest thou not iudge and revenge our bloud on them that dwell on the earth?
A17981God of heaven and ● arth, that hath shewed such favour to his Church in England?
A17981How long Lord, holy and true?
A17981I demand then, sayth Augustin: Whether they thinke, that the superior powers ought not to haue care of Religion,& of punishing false religion?
A17981If they should deceiue some men with the maske, and with the empty title o ● the Catholike Church, what haue they gotten thereby?
A17981In all which may appeare what God did for them, and what he doth for his Church alwaies: but what are they to doe to God?
A17981Is there any man in the world that knoweth any thing of religion, that can denie that we are in a good state, and our enemies in a desperate state?
A17981May we not see how they come in secretly, and scraule in corners like Serpents?
A17981Must not we then glorifi ● his name that hath done so great things for vs?
A17981O but( said he) and why not the Queene her selfe?
A17981Of these things what can our aduersaries deny?
A17981That so weake a Woman should be able to defend her selfe against so many, so potent enemies?
A17981The Lord Deputy sent a trumpetter to the ● ort to demand what they were?
A17981The Prince happily would be at Parliament with the King, his Father: how should they then be able to seaze vpon the Duke?
A17981The first word he spake after he came into their companie, was, Shall we alwaies, Gentlemen, talke, and neuer doe any thing?
A17981Then he was demanded, if the Pope should send an Armie into England against the Queene, whether he would take the Popes part, or the Queenes?
A17981They aske vs, when was this change, vnder what King, vnder what Emperour, vnder what Pope?
A17981Was there ever any noble house in these times ruinated, without the practise of these wicked miscreants?
A17981What became of these two Princes, Queene Elizabeth& King Iames, against whom the world thus conspired?
A17981What businesse they had in Ireland?
A17981What cause haue we then,& how many waies are we prouoked to trust in God, to loue him, to worship him, that so miraculously hath defended vs?
A17981What is that deceivablenesse of vnrighteousnesse?
A17981Whether they held her for a lawfull Queene?
A17981Whether they yeelded their cōsent to the opiniōs of Sanders& Bristow, concerning the authoritie of that Bull?
A17981Whether, if the Pope should warre against the Queene, they would take his part or hers?
A17981Whē the Iewes were Gods Church, this appeared among them, what was their priuiledge?
A17981Who sent them?
A17981Why they had fortified a place in the Queenes Kingdome?
A17981Yea, and not onely to match them, but to master them?
A17981but can our adversaries comfort themselues in their owne mischeifes?
A17981can not be the Church of God?
A17981can not pray to God, or expect any blessing from him vpon their execrable practises?
A17981or how can they giue examples of an holy life, whose whole practise and conuersation is in bloud, in malice, in wicked and wretched actions?
A17981the serpents seed; for can any man with any reason deny these men to be the seed of the serpent?
A17981to cleaue with all singlenes of heart to that cause that hath bin so mightily maintayned by Gods hand and power?
A17981was there euer any execrable practises in the world so pow ● rfu ● ly condemned from heauen, as their practises haue beene?
A5116029. for sure I am, that God once dispossessed the Prelates and Malignants of all these; and should they again possess them through our Defect?
A51160And how can you say that ever they were protected?
A51160And how should one know such Negatives in matter of Fact without Omniscience?
A51160And must he be impudent because he does not know the Plots against the Government?
A51160And must you never be cured of this impertinence, that you oblige your Adversary to prove a Negative in a matter of Fact?
A51160Answer, with my Merchant: But, saith he, with whom in particular?
A51160Are these the Weapons by which you serve your Party?
A51160Asking one of the Students what was his Name, the Youth told him so and so, but not adding his Sirname; He asked again, quid est totum nomen?
A51160But did they protect them when they were deposed?
A51160But pray, have you any such presumptions against the Dr?
A51160But what alled you at My Lord St. Andrews?
A51160But what was it that he said of Mr. Rutherford''s Writings?
A51160But would you have another sample of their Casuistical Theology?
A51160But, Mr. Ridpath, what was it that he said?
A51160But, saith he, I heard ye have been over Seas, with whom did ye converse there?
A51160Did ever the transcendent Power of Rome go higher?
A51160Did not He deserve death?
A51160Did you ever read any thing worse in the Casuistick Writings of the Jesuits?
A51160For, if they of Herriot''s Hospital may celebrate an Anniversary, why may not all the Inhabitants of Edinburgh do it?
A51160Had we no Presbyterian Ministers in Scotland, but such as deserted their Churches in the West after the Restoration?
A51160How often do you meet, in the Old Testament, the Jewish Clergy dichotomized into Priests and Levites?
A51160I have often told you that Negatives in a Matter of Fact are not otherwise to be prov''d?
A51160Is there any plain evidence against him?
A51160Monro, Alexander, d. 1715?
A51160Monro, Alexander, d. 1715?
A51160Mr. Ridpath, I would gladly know whether you think that a Libel against Dr. Monro was a Book worthy to be dedicated to the Parliament of Scotland?
A51160Must we be said to laugh at Religion, if we smile when we hear a Man gravely telling us, that Abraham left the Land of Chaldea for Debt?
A51160Must we prove that Presbyterians are Rebels?
A51160To which I answered, that I never told them any such thing, but where did you see James Wallace last?
A51160Was the Covenant no older than the Tender?
A51160Were not Mr. Meldrum and Mr. Wilkie, and many others that I could name, Presbyterians, tho they conformed to Episcopacy?
A51160What a juggle was it to say, that Men might vote freely for that Government which was, for the matter, abjured?
A51160What is there in the Murder of Archbishop Sharp that may not be justified by your Principles?
A51160Where was he Parson when he was accused?
A51160Why then do not ye appear openly above- board, for the Bishop declines no competent Judge in Scotland?
A51160Will it therefore follow, that there was no High- priest among them to govern the whole Society?
A51160and do you think to impose upon the World by such Bedlam Fooleries?
A51160and how came you to know that there are no Plots in the World of the Moon?
A51160and if particular Societies be exempted, why may not the whole Nation pretend an exemption?
A51160and if upon his Hypothesis there was no Title, pray what becomes of your Argumentum ad hominem?
A51160and when the Magistrates are open and avowed Enemies to the cause of God, is it not lawful for some to interpose?
A51160by whom was he accused?
A51160himself know*, that he had forfeited his Title to the Crown?
A51160that, in some places they were very dark and obscure; and was this any such extraordinary Crime?
A51160to be?
A51160was it ever required of any of them that conformed to Episcopacy, to assert that Episcopacy, was preferable to a Parity of Presbyters?
A51160who heard of this Accusation before your scurrilous Pamphlet appeared?
A93888And againe, Thou hast not lyed unto men, but unto God: and is this so strange a thing?
A93888And do''s he thus accept of Meat and Clothing, and do''s he not accept of those kind of endowments, that bring both these to perpetuity?
A93888And where a King sweares defence, what can it imply but defence in a Royall Kingly way?
A93888Are not all our lyes to be accounted sinnes before God?
A93888Doth He like( can you imagine) to be Fed and Clothed to day, and in danger to be Starved to morrow?
A93888He might as well have asked, Why not as well for temporall uses, as for temporall uses?
A93888He sayes, — I know not how you can with reason gainsay the bringing offenders to justice: indeed nor I neither, but what if they be not offenders?
A93888How come they to change or dispose any thing?
A93888How?
A93888I omit those proofs that would be thought far too tedious, t is enough to quote the Prophets words, Will a man rob God?
A93888If he be accursed that wrongs his neighbour in his Lands, what shall he be that injures God?
A93888If not, why may not some use the word furtum in Sabinus his sense, as well as others may in Ulpians?
A93888If so, who knowes that the Parliament will transferre them to Lay- hands?
A93888Nay what thinke you if this Tenet be approved by a plaine act of Parliament?
A93888No more to a place where a Church is built, then where men have now placed a Stable?
A93888No warrant from the Word of God?
A93888Out into 〈 ◊ 〉: Have Church- men no title to those possessions they enjoy, but by the law of this Land alone?
A93888Secondly, Thou that sayest a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adultery?
A93888Shall I beleeve, and yet disbeleeve that selfe- same consent which is the best ground of my beliefe?
A93888Sir, will you keepe Peace and godly agreement entirely( according to your power) both to God, the holy Church, the Clergy, and the People?
A93888Sir, will you( to your power) cause Law, Justice, and Discretion in mercy and truth to be executed in all your judgements?
A93888The New Testament will afford more places for this purpose; Thou that abhorrest Idols, committest thou Sacriledge?
A93888What if they must be brought to injustice?
A93888Will He take Meat and refuse Revenues?
A93888hath God no more Title in propriety of speech to one piece of ground then another?
A82314And had it not been much better at first to have subjected our selves to the lusts of one man, as after, to the worse lu ● ● of many men?
A82314And seriously, who are there, who have resisted lawful Authority, as you the pretended Ministers of the Gospel have done?
A82314Art thou a stranger, that thou knowest not this?
A82314But by the way, What have the Commissioners of the Church of Scotland to do with the Agreement of the people of England?
A82314But how are these Clergy men wedded to the empty forms of things, not onely in the Church, but State too?
A82314But this is a far different case from that of the Parliament and Army: for why did God reject Saul?
A82314But what is lawfull Authority?
A82314But would Presbytery have so?
A82314Can the Church of Scotland thus commission them, to deal, and trouble, and then after fish in the State of England?
A82314Do you understand this now?
A82314For have not many of the forenamed names, seemed as the starres of Heaven, as bright and glorious lights in the Church?
A82314For( to insist only on the last) how dangerous a thing is it to any State, to have two outward powers, or two outward Kingdoms in one Nation?
A82314Hath not their Ministry seemed to shine and spa ● kle in the City, and other places?
A82314Have not those that refuse, as much power and freedom to judg, as those who would impose it upon them?
A82314If they say they impose in things necessary — We demand who are judges of these things?
A82314If you ask how that may be done, that the greater part of the people should consent to that which is good?
A82314If you say, you can not see it to be so: I answer, how should you, when you first, and after some body else hath shut your eyes?
A82314Is not this to take power over those, who have equal power with themselves, and to incroach over the freedom of those, who are as free as themselves?
A82314Is there any such evil in a Kingdom, for which God hath provided no remedy?
A82314Or are they yet become our Lords and Masters, that they thus set themselves over us?
A82314Reader, do you think yet, they are out of their sphere, or no?
A82314Shall they be compelled by others to do it, and be destroyed, if they will not obey?
A82314Since that time, how have you sweated ▪ by your own, and the Malignant party ▪ in both Kingdoms to oppress them?
A82314That there is no respect of persons with God?
A82314To whom did God give the Morall Law, and whom meant he, when he said, Thou shalt do no murder?
A82314Well then, the power that is of God, or the lawfull Authority, how shall it be known?
A82314What strange Notions have the vulgar people of Laws?
A82314Why are they so busie to impose their own Church Government on us, and to hinder us from our own State Agreement?
A82314Why may not the Parliament and Army as well change the Government of the State, as you of the Clergie the Government of the Church?
A82314Why might not they propound as well a new Agreement, as you a new Directory, Catechism, Confession, and Discipline?
A82314Why saith Pilate( when the high Priests brought Christ before him, that he might condemn him) what evill hath he done?
A82314and how have you prayed and preached against them, as your Pulpits and Congregations can witness?
A82314and what is this so much as in one tittle to the Jesuits killing of Kings?
A82314did he meane men of low degree only, and excepted men of high degree, or no?
A82314do you understand this thing?
A82314or if it shall appear you are all of you ignorant of it, will you not disdain to be taught?
A67904At what time were most heresies broached?
A67904But what speake wee of the Churches reformed?
A67904Can the workes of the holy Ghost be impure?
A67904Christiani omnes adoramus Christum imagini& simulachro, non prosternimur coram imagine forsan, quid ad rem vero?
A67904Dare hee say, that the King commanded any such thing motu proprio?
A67904Did any King of England ever assay to expurge the publike Bookes of the Church, without the advise of his Clergie?
A67904Did ever King Charles meddle in any Church matter of far lesse importance without Doctour Lads counsell?
A67904Did hee command that expunction without any information, without any mans advise?
A67904Did not we and our Councell by equall authoritie command these innovations of Canons and Liturgie?
A67904Is not that man the evident author of all the Scotish broyles?
A67904May any be so uncharitable, as to suspect his late promotion in Durham, hath altered so soon his minde?
A67904May not a childlesse man say in his prayers, that God is the Father of the Elect, and of their seed, though himselfe as yet have no seed?
A67904Princes are Gods deputes, of whom should they be limited?
A67904Quid est enim altare( as Optatus speaks) nisi sedes 〈 ◊ 〉& 〈 ◊ 〉 Christi?
A67904Relatum inter hereticos Aerium qui Epiphanio credat vel Augustino necesse est fateatur,& tu qui 〈 ◊ 〉 Aerium quo nomine damnas?
A67904Shall we alone sit still for ever?
A67904Such actions, or at least long permission of such abominations doe they flow from any other but his Grace, the head and heart of the Cabbin Counsel?
A67904The third excuse, That the King then had no seed: How is this pertinent?
A67904Then in his owne words, quid ergo?
A67904Was not the altar the chiefest place which with most ceremony& devotion was hallowed?
A67904What needs all such uproare then without cause?
A67904What then?
A67904Who hath caused to cage up in the Tower that great and learned Bishop of Lincolne?
A67904Who other but they have keeped our most gracious Prince at a distance from the countrey almost ever since he came to the Crowne?
A67904Who sent Doctor Chappell first to the University of Dublin, and then to his Episcopall chair?
A67904Whose invention are these privy Articles, which his creature Derry presents to divers, who take Orders from his holy hands?
A67904Why judge we so eargerly others for holding of errours, are any without them?
A67904Why should we presume so 〈 ◊ 〉 of 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 wee are in our none- age, and know 〈 ◊ 〉 in part?
A67904Why was that poore Prince the King of Boheme to his dying day kept from any considerable helpe from Britaine?
A67904shal we send always 〈 ◊ 〉 but base contemtible& derided 〈 ◊ 〉 to these 〈 ◊ 〉 Princes?
A47922And who are the Petitioners all this while, but most of them the Old stagers?
A47922Are not Knaves and Fools the greater part of the World?
A47922Are these the men of Reverence that must Teach us Maners toward God Almighty, and are yet to learn it Themselves towards his Vicegerent?
A47922BUt Really hath Liberty to forbear, produced such Divisions as you mention?
A47922But has any man the Face to mention Loyalty, and the Covenant, in the same Day?
A47922But what a vayles it to offer Light to those that shut their Eyes, or Reason to a man that dares not hearken to it?
A47922But what became of these People?
A47922But what''s the Question?
A47922But what''s the portion then of those Impenitents that were the Barbarous Enforcers of it?
A47922By what Law were the People freed from their Allegiance, and made the Iudges, and Reformers of the Government?
A47922Can not Inferiours erre too?
A47922Can our Covenanters now shew us a Text for the Scottish Discipline?
A47922Can our Iudaising Brethren shew us but a Levitical Law yet for our money?
A47922Did they not meddle with them neither to make them take it?
A47922Do we not see familiarly, that a sad Tale upon the Stage, makes the People Cry in the Pit?
A47922Does it not encourage the People to adhore to a Rebellious Princple?
A47922Have not the Independent Schismatiques the same Pretence, as well as the Presbyterian?
A47922How great a madness is it then for those People to unite against the Publique?
A47922I demand, will they consent to the Civil Government, then?
A47922If in the People, why do they contradict themselves, and Petition his Majesty?
A47922Is it not Reconciliation, if They Return to the Church?
A47922Must it be Now, or Never then?
A47922Or Judas the less Treacherous for doing his business with a Kiss?
A47922Or do they dream themselves at work again with the Poor Cavaliers?
A47922Or in a word, sneaking Complaints, as if his Sacred Majesty would not grant, what with Conseience, Honour, and Safety he can not deny?
A47922Or what Answer is it to an Objection that there were great and many Divisions, to say that there were some Agreements?
A47922Should we lose the Opportunity?
A47922So said the Solemn Fopp it self: and under that pretext, pray''ye how far went they?
A47922That is, what is a King, without the Essentials of Royalty; but a mere Name, and Property?
A47922The Conscience of an Oath, do they say?
A47922The Question is, what was the Effect of that Popular Defection from the Practice of the Church?
A47922The bloudy Reformation ever the less Impious, because''t was dress''d up with Texts, and Covenants?
A47922The second Intimation subjects the Piety, and Good nature of his Majesty to a Question; as who should say; what?
A47922Their Open Retractations and Amendments?
A47922Their Seditious Conventicles; Their Anti- Episcopal Lectures, and without These, their Desolating Reformation?
A47922Their Sins as Publique as the Day; but where''s their Penitence?
A47922Was it not Haeresie, and Rebellion?
A47922Was not the Last King Persecuted, Dethron''d, Robb''d,& c. — according to the Covenant?
A47922Was the Murther of the late King ever the less execrable, because the Scaffold was hung with Black?
A47922Were Lucifer himself Incarnate, and a Subject, would he not blush to treat his Sovereign with their Arguments?
A47922Were we not in the high- way to Vnity, when Churches were turn''d into Stables, and houses of Infamy supplyed the place of Churches?
A47922What Publick Peace can be expected; when the Schools of Vnity and Order are become a Nurcery of Schisme?
A47922What hazzard of mis- construction were it, to mention any Trouble of Mind Imaginable?
A47922What is a Prince without his Negative Voice?
A47922What is become now of the Liberty of Conscience these Faithless Creatures promised to all that sided with them?
A47922What''s this to us?
A47922Where is the Practice( they prescribe) of their Obedience?
A47922Where lies the Wonder, if those that agreed in Doctrine, differ''d not much in other matters, when there was nothing else for them to differ upon?
A47922Where''s their Repentance for putting Gods Name, to the Devil''s Commission?
A47922Where''s their Repentance, for the Souls they have Damn''d by their Seditious Doctrine?
A47922Whether is the greater shame: for Them to Act these Crimes, or for Us, to Name them?
A47922Without This Liberty of Freedome, where had been their separate Assemblies?
A47922[ A] IF we should sin against God( say they) because wee are commanded, who shall answer for us, or save us from his Iustice?
A47922[ But Really, hath Liberty to forbear produced such divisions?
A47922[ King Agrippa believest thou the Prophets?
A47922[ The Licence or Connivence that was granted to Haeretiques, Apostates& c. —] When will These mens Mouths be Sweet again, after so foul a Calumny?
A47922and Speaking evil of Dignities: of the Heart- breaking Humm''s and Haws, and the doleful tunes they Teach in?
A47922and Vnity if they Agree with it?
A47922and mean, that if his Majesty come not In by such a time, he is not to be admitted to his Composition?
A47922and their own way, or None?
A47922if in the Presbyterian Pastors; why do they Supplicate the Bishops?
A47922of A Cloak in A Pulpit?
A47922of Reviling Bishops?
A47922or dare they but pretend, that the Iurors understood what they swore to do?
A47922or that the late King entred into Covenant with the People to Observe it?
A47922the Bloud they have made the People spill, by their Incentives to the War?
A47922the Power of Life and Death, and the Militia?
A47922will the King destroy so many Thousand Souls of his poor People for a matter of Nothing?
A85688( a) What of David?
A85688And is not that a Parliament which stands in the nearest relation to the people, which is the liveliest representation of them?
A85688And therefore what followed?
A85688Because former Representatives presumed too much, shall future assume nothing, no not a power of restraint?
A85688But what call, what warrant had the Army to intermeddle?
A85688Did not Cbarles the ninth of France, the same?
A85688Is the Nation by any one act in hazard?
A85688Justice is the support of Religion: Is not this to know mee, saith the Lord; to doe judgement and justice, to judge the cause of the poore and needy?
A85688Nay ▪ ● s not this peace rather secured?
A85688Papists and Atheists?
A85688The Covenant was only a civill bond wherein we engaged out of respect to the publick peace and safety of the Nation?
A85688The Lord should lose the honor of the high praise of the Saints, how can they sing the Lords song under captive enemies?
A85688The officers commanding, the members commanded to be truly religious, and of approved integrity and fidelities?
A85688What Jury will condemn a man that steals a loa ● e of bread to save his owne and his childrens life, if hee could not obtaine it by begging?
A85688When the Lord hideth his face, who then can behold him?
A85688Woe unto us, when the Lord would heal the breaches of this Nation, and we wil not be healed; what may we feare but judgment advanced to the skies?
A85688and what History can Parallel the Acts of the late KING herein?
A85688but a Tempe ● ● of fire and Brimstone, who could have feared?
A85688but when he giveth quietnesse, who then can make trouble?
A85688did not thy father do judgment and justice, and then it was well 〈 ◊ 〉 him?
A85688had not they the being from, and shall they assume Authority over Parliaments?
A85688have not the Parliament wisely layed the Axe to the root of our distempers?
A85688he judged the cause of the poor and needy, and then 〈 ◊ 〉 was well with him: was not this to know me, saith the Lord?
A85688shall such a man as I flee( saith hee?)
A85688what Inc ● sts?
A85688what Oppression?
A85688what Pride?
A85688what contempt of divine Worship, Sabbaths, Ministers, Saints?
A85688what grosse Prophanenesse?
A85688what said Nehemiah, whe ● his enemies plotted, and his friends feared?
A85688what secret Idolatry?
A85688yea, what Pagan Ignorance?
A54581A: What do you here intend to refer to?
A54581According to those words in Malachi, If then I be a Father, where is my honour?
A54581And then having brought in his Popish opponents objection, Hem quid audio?
A54581And what is the Reason which the Iudges give of this Resolution?
A54581And will your Lordships allow this ecclesiastical Head no ecclesiastical Senses?
A54581But I should be glad to know whether it made any fermentation in the Body of the People Representative, and what was the Result of it?
A54581But doth that Explanation of the Regal Power assert any thing in Defence of the Dispensative part of it?
A54581But were not their Consciences extremely erroneous who thought themselves bound then to advance Religion by War?
A54581But will you then tell me of Disability being thus tacitly dispens''d with, and with a salvo to Conscience as to the obligation of humane Laws?
A54581But( I beseech you) did not the Protestant Divines of the Church of Scotland then cry out of the unlawfulness or inexpedience of that Dispensation?
A54581But( by the way) do you think then that Sovereign Princes offend the Law of God in Pardoning Murther?
A54581Can you guess whence it is that men have imbibed this mistaken fancy?
A54581Can you readily now at this time give any instance of the House of Commons th ● … n doing any thing of that Nature?
A54581Did Sir William Iones maintain the King''s Power of Dispensing with Acts of Parliament?
A54581Did the Parliament acquiesce in what the King had done as aforesaid?
A54581Did they offend any other Uncontroverted Rights of the Crown?
A54581Do you account it to have any great spreading Influence on mens Consciences here in keeping them both innocent and quiet?
A54581Have you this Matter of Fact out of any of the Records in England or Scotland?
A54581It seem''d very necessary in the judgment of our Governors then?
A54581No Ecclesiastical Persons to be censulted with at all?
A54581No not in any Circumstances of time and place?
A54581No?
A54581Or did the late Kings Loyal long Parliament do so in their obtaining the Act for the Habeas Corpus, and others that might be named?
A54581W ● … at account doth Mr. Prynne give of that?
A54581Was that Speech of the Archbishop ever printed?
A54581Was that all the favour he shew''d Roman- Catholicks?
A54581What a Concatenation of Perjuries was our Land so long enslaved with?
A54581What?
A54581Whether a mere Lay- man no Doctor of the Civil Law, may be a Bishop''s Register, contrary to an Act of Parliament?
A54581Whether a mere Lay- man, no Doctor of the Civil Law, may be a Bishop''s Chancellor, and so may Excommunicate?
A54581Whom do you mean by those?
A54581what had become of that great work of our Reformation in this flourishing Church of England?
A85746''T was said of old, Casar, when will you give your Vote?
A85746A question may be made, why the Apostles call''d the Pastors, ordained by them, by the name of Presbyters?
A85746And afterward, If we have sowen unto you spirituall things, is it a great thing if we shall reap your carnall things?
A85746And again in another place; What is the Bishop, but the Prince; and the Presbyters, but his Counsellours?
A85746Away with the unlearned Interpreters of History: who doth not see here that by Investitures is meant the collution of Bishopricks?
A85746But the weaknesse of this Argument is convinced by like examples; for what Function is not conversant about the King?
A85746But who ever heard of any Penitentiary, that was not a Pastor?
A85746Chrysostom of old hath said the same: How absurd is it, in all things to be sway''d by the sentence of other men?
A85746Excellently saith Austin: If the Curator Commands somewhat, is it not to be done?
A85746Hence was that twice spoken of a King, though most unjust, yet set up by God, Who can lay his hand upon the Lords anointed, and be guiltlesse?
A85746How so?
A85746If so much was lawfull to the Church for avoyding of contentions, why might not as much be lawfull for avoyding of the mischief of Oligarchy?
A85746If this reason prevail, how many Pastors, honest and faithfull, but not of learning enough to be Doctors, must be denyed to judge?
A85746Otherwise, whence came that so great Prerogative of the Constantinopolitan Church?
A85746Otherwise, why doe the Pastors of England appeale unto this or that Bishop, all the Bishops unto the two Archbishops?
A85746Paul and Barnabas, and some of Antioch, are sent to know the judgement of the Pastors; of all Asia?
A85746Say I these things as a man?
A85746The Disputation makes a great noise in the Law- School, What parts of Authority may be committed to other by the Highest Power?
A85746The words are these: Old age indeed is honourable among all Nations?
A85746Therefore, if the Emperour doe require one thing, and God another, what is to be done?
A85746This same testimony of Scripture, he had produced elsewhere, to the same sense: who goeth a warfare any time at his own charges?
A85746Was it, because scarce any other but old men were called to that Office?
A85746Was there but one Pastor in every City?
A85746What Church is there now, wherein this Office is retain''d?
A85746What answer doth God returne?
A85746What can be more clear?
A85746What need any speciall Mandate, when the Law was extant, unlesse perhaps to incite the negligent?
A85746What reproaches should they not have heard, had the change of Doctrine been joyned with the acquisition of preferment?
A85746Whence had the Synod of Chalcedon power to abrogate the acts of the second at Ephesus?
A85746Whereupon is that of Chrysostome, If this berequired under Pagan Kings, how much more ought it to be under Kings that are believers?
A85746Who sees not, this was done beside the Canons?
A85746Whose footsteps Bernard following, speaks in these words to an Archbishop: If every Soule, yours also: who hath excepted you from the Universall?
A85746Why so?
A85746Why then is the Letter sent to One in every Church, if no One had a peculiar and eminent Function?
A85746Why then may we not believe this end was look''d upon by some of their Law- givers?
A85746it is said, pray the Lord, to send Labourers into his Harvest; and that is pertinent, How shall they Preach, unlesse they bee sent?
A85746or who feedeth a flock, and eateth not of the milk of the flock?
A85746or, because in the Synagogue also the Masters, by an excellency, had that appellation?
A85746or, saith not the Law the same?
A85746or, when did the antients ever believe, that the use of the Keys might be separated from the Ministry of the Word and Sacraments?
A85746or,( which I like as well) by a similitude taken from the Jewish Magistrates?
A85746who planteth a Vineyard, and eateth not of the fruit thereof?
A56396And is the difference of these two States so small, that the loss of one should be no Damage, and the suffering of the other no Punishment?
A56396And let it be the reason if he pleases, for what can follow thence, then that Unity of Faith obliges to Unity of Discipline?
A56396And was not every Man concluded by the Vote of the whole Council?
A56396Aut quid Episcopis cum Palatio?
A56396Begin to serve Providence in great things but can not finish?
A56396But Secondly, What Fathers make it to consist only in those Unions?
A56396But if the Governors of the Church are so strictly injoin''d this Vertue, where they have Authority, how much more are they, where they have none?
A56396But secondly, Which way came this Power into Civil Sovereigns?
A56396But to what purpose do you tell the Common People of legal Proceedings?
A56396But to what purpose is it for God to make Laws, if Men may evacuate their force by such Metaphysical Nothings?
A56396But were they so?
A56396But what has a King no Remedy?
A56396But what if the word did not please his Palate, what need of all this rage and indignation against it?
A56396But what is this new Light, that was never seen in the World before?
A56396But you will say, why not Caesar too?
A56396Can it reasonably be expected that in so long a Tract of time there should not be one instance of the miscarriage of Christians in this kind?
A56396Did not every particular Apostle give an account of his own Churches to the whole Colledge?
A56396Did they not Govern the Church, as much as they could, by common consent?
A56396Did they not advise together upon Emergent Controversies?
A56396Does any Father affirm that there is no other Union in the Church, but only of Faith, Charity and Peace?
A56396For how can we submit to the Office of a King, but by submitting to the King himself?
A56396For if they happen to contradict each other, as of later time they have too often done, who shall over- rule?
A56396For what care they for that?
A56396For what if it be true?
A56396In our present case, what can the Apostles Command signifie, when he peremptorily and indefinitly requires subjection to the Higher Powers?
A56396Is not that a Condition bad enough?
A56396Is there then no Remedy to ease themselves?
A56396Now what a strange leap in arguing is this, from a jest upon a Princes Beard, to raise an Army to cut his Throat?
A56396Quid est natum?
A56396Thinkest thou that I can not now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more then Twelve Legions of Angels?
A56396What can be more evident then that he makes the Unity of the Christian Body to consist in an Unity of Discipline as well as of Faith?
A56396What does that prove, but that they were so much Men, as sometimes to have fall''n short both of their Duty and Profession?
A56396What have Christians to do with Kings, or Bishops with the Court?
A56396What is that against the general and declared Sense of the Church?
A56396What is the Reason that so many in our days set their hands to the Plough, and look back again?
A56396What one mortal Man''s Salvageness could ever have spilt half so much Blood, as was shed in any one eminent Battel?
A56396What thickness of Contradiction is this, A Power Ecclesiastical, and yet no Power at all?
A56396What, did not the Apostles keep Unity among themselves?
A56396Where what was voted by the Bishops, was over- ruled by him?
A56396vel de nullis extantibus Creatura est filius dei?
A854193. e Quando audisti, Clementissime Imperator, in causa fidei Laicos de Episcopo judicasse?
A85419If he may, from whom, or by whom, shall this surplussage of power be conceived to be derived unto him?
A85419Man, who hath made me a Judg, or Divider over you?
A85419Or in case a Christian State should thus practise, would it not be a snare of confirmation and obduration upon the Mahometan in his way?
A85419Or is it a thing equitable or lawful to impose Mulcts and Penalties upon blind men, whose eyes were put out by their parents, because they see not?
A85419Or is their fact in preaching the Gospel upon such terms, and before any publique approbation, any ways censurable by the Word of God?
A85419Or ought not rather the Heads and Principals in such Tumults be enquired out, and punished?
A85419Or was the Ark of God in any real danger of suffering inconvenience by the shaking of the Oxen, in case Vzzah had not intermedled to prevent it?
A85419Or whether is a Christian State any whit the more like to receive countenance or blessing from God, for such practices in it as these?
A85419Or who, according to the Word of God, shall be judged meet to umpire in this so great and difficult an affair?
A85419The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go, and gather them up?
A85419Whether is not the manifestation of the Spirit( as the Apostle termeth the manifest gifts of the Spirit of God) given to every man to profit withall?
A85419and again, Neither be ye called Masters?
A85419and that there is no infallible Judg on Earth in Controversies incident to Christian Religion?
A85419and whether was not God offended with him notwithstanding, making a breach upon him by slaying him in the place?
A85419or upon what account can be justifie himself in the exercise of it?
A42790And is it not much more reason, that we avoid appearance of evil, and offences towards our Superiors and Rulers, than towards one another?
A42790And may we not reasonably expect the same Measure from our Earthly Governours?
A42790And sometimes to Attire her self in the Harlotry and Disguise of Rebellion its self?
A42790And what other assurance would any man wish for?
A42790And why( forsooth) should we for discharging our Duty, be thus malitiously slandered, as Hypocrites and Court- flatterers?
A42790And yet the People be at their own Liberty in Arbitrarily Obeying as they shall Judge it Reasonable and Agreeable to the Ends of Government?
A42790Are there not more Libels sent forth to overturn the present Establishment, than Sermons to uphold the Peace and Order of the State?
A42790Are there not more Underminers of the Government, than Preachers of Submission to Authority?
A42790But how then shall the Scripture be fulfilled?
A42790But what( I pray ye) is or can be the meaning of those words, Ye must needs be subject?
A42790But why do I mention these things?
A42790Did Paul flatter Nero in his Epistle to the Romans?
A42790Did Paul here in the Text, put Titus upon that Unchristian, Servile, that Unmanly art of Flattery?
A42790Did the Prophets or Good Men blow the Trumpet, and Assemble the People to Oppose the Usurpers?
A42790Does not the Municipal Law of the Land say as much?
A42790First, What if the Supream Magistrate be an Usurper?
A42790For is it not reasonable thus to Judge, of the Wisdom, and Righteousness, and Goodness of God?
A42790How beautiful on the Mountains are the feet of them that bring good Tidings, and publish Peace?
A42790How little do they Honour him?
A42790How of late was Obedience to the Higher Powers run down with full Cry, forc''d to skulk, and pass along the Streets in Masquerade?
A42790How often, how peremptorily are we commanded in general to crucifie our selves to the world, and the world to us?
A42790If it be ask''d, What is the extent of our Subjection, and unto what Acts of Obedience are we hereby Oblig''d?
A42790In fine were all the Bishops, Priests, and Holy Men of Old, that laid down their Lives for the Faith, Parasites?
A42790Is there not reason, a necessity for us so to do?
A42790Is this Flattery?
A42790Look, how dieth the greatest Potentate?
A42790Love your Enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, pray for them that despitefully use you and persecute you?
A42790May we revile them; may we by force resist them; may we secretly conspire against them; may we murder or eject them?
A42790Or do I say it only?
A42790Or how is it possible for us, to state the question aright?
A42790Or was our blessed Saviour himself a Flatterer, when he bids the Jews — give unto Caesar; the things that are Caesar''s?
A42790Supposing then that the Prince would not give to the People this Assurance, I ask whether he is then Oblig''d to Govern strictly by the present Law?
A42790The Children of Israel under Pharaohs hard Bondage cryed unto the Lord?
A42790Thinkest thou not, that I can pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve Legions of Angels for my Defence?
A42790To him that smites thee on the right cheek turn the other also?
A42790To suffer patiently from the Civil Magistrate, to take wrong from the Kings Ministers rather than from our equals and Fellow Subjects?
A42790Was Tertullian a Sycophant?
A42790Was this an unfaithful Representation of the Christians Loyalty in those Days?
A42790What else means that Malicious Raillery, and those abusive Pasquils sent forth for the wounding his Honour?
A42790What if he become an Enemy to Godliness, a Betrayer of the true Reformed Religion of the Nation?
A42790What is the meaning of this?
A42790What was the Subject of the Apostles Sermon?
A42790What?
A42790When and where( I pray) and in what Relation are these Gospel Precepts applicable to us, if not in our Political State?
A42790Where is that wise Man, and indued with Knowledge?
A42790Where is the Law of Nature, that Great, that Royal Law of self Preservation?
A42790With what Power and Might, and outstretched Arms did the Lord of Hosts second his Petitions?
A42790With what ease than may ambitious Men and corrupt Magistrates trample on us?
A42790Yea, are not the Enemies of Peace more apparently guilty of Flattery?
A42790and who is the Son of Jesse?
A42790who is David?
A5204810.4,& c. Why then does it not as well belong to the Civil Magistrate?
A520482. the members confirm their love,& c. Doth the Magistrate thus?
A52048Alas, alas, is there no medium between Boniface and Morellius, between Papacy and Anarchy?
A52048Also may not godly men be true and blamable causes of great Schisme?
A52048As for that question, What way simple error or heresie should be punished?
A52048Because David a godly man falls into adultery, therefore tolerate that sin?
A52048But doth the Magistrate require no more?
A52048But if the Magistrate Tolerate those who cast off the Institutions of Christ, to what purpose doth he take care to see them executed?
A52048But is this the Order of Christ, to send out Ministers without Ordination?
A52048But what shall he do with the Episcopal mans Conscience for he is against both these, shall he compell him?
A52048But what shall the Magistrate do?
A52048But what shall the Magistrate doe, when there are such disputes about Church- Government?
A52048But will not this expose Gods people to persecution, there are so few Magistrates good, and if their Consciences be misinformed, what then?
A52048By corrupt Ministers, I doe not mean such as labour under any infirmities, for who is sufficient then?
A52048By this you may see the judgement of this solid Divine and his fears; and what sober man doth not fear the like?
A52048Do these answer the Apostles description in his Epistles to Titus and Timothy?
A52048Dr. Ames[ in his answer to that question, whither Heretics should be punished by the Civil Magistrate?]
A52048Hierom could tell us in his time, when Corruptions had overgrown the Church, Excepting Ordination what doth a Bishop that a Presbyter doth not?
A52048Honesty, that if men will be honest, the Magistrate must provide they may live peaceably?
A52048How can it be his duty to doe this, and yet his duty to Tolerate those who throw them off?
A52048How many pages have the Ministers pen filled in defence of the Magistracy against the Anabaptists?
A52048How shall he answer this Text, that his people under him may live in All godlin ● ss?
A52048If so, what he hath committed to them in this behalfe?
A52048If there be no respect due to Synods to what purpose are they called?
A52048If they can not, why do they cast off Communion with them?
A52048If we ask further concerning the power of Synods, what they may doe to Heretical Congregations?
A52048Is it not true[ who dare deny it] that the Magistrate is bound to provide that men live honestly in matters of the second table?
A52048Is the Magistrate indeed unsatisfied that he knows not which it is?
A52048May not a man that is godly[ at least seems to be so,] fall into such an errour of judgement, as neither Church nor State must tolerate?
A52048Now I come to the second question, Positively, what must they Doe?
A52048Now to what Kingdom doe Errors and Heresies belong?
A52048Pull down Antichrist?
A52048Q. Whither the Lord hath Committed to these Magistrates the Care of Religion?
A52048Secondly, What they are in relation one to another, What is it to the Church that Christ is head of the world?
A52048Sixthly, Why doth Mr. Prynne add which are Onely able to effect this work?
A52048Some errors in practise we must bear, why not then some errors in judgement?
A52048Take the moral law strictly, and lay by the fourth Commandement, what doth it differ from the law of nature?
A52048The Magistrate gives you leave to doe these, why do not the Churches do them?
A52048The second Question: What Care hath God Committed to the Magistrate in the matters of Religion?
A52048What Cause have the Church to bless God for those brave lights which have shined in our Universities?
A52048What shall become of the Nation, and Courts of Judgement?
A52048What then?
A52048What, in these points Apostatize?
A52048and What to the World that he is head over the Church, what are they better or worse?
A52048give himself up to the Synod?
A52048if there be a mystery of iniquity in the one, is there not an university of iniquity in the other?
A52048is Repentance his end he directly and firstly aymes at?
A52048now it is, who is Not sufficient for these things?
A52048these fellows had no election from the people, nor no Ordination: What is all Order thrown down?
A52048thou that abhorrest Episcopacy, dost thou commit Popery?
A52048what do these things presage?
A52048what need of him?
A52048will they not bear each with other?
A498004. Who are the witnesses, by whose testimony this Antiquity and Universality is proved?
A49800A Parliament may declare it, but some make it a Question whether their Declaration be binding?
A49800All men should be of this spiritual Society, but are not many excluded through their own fault and just Judgment of God?
A49800And can this be consistent with the interest of any Christian Civil State?
A49800And if so, where are our Arch- Bishops, Metropolitans and Patriarchs?
A49800And shall not Gods promise extend so far as their Obligation?
A49800And shall not such as are born of Christians be Christians?
A49800And shall there be no Government, no submission till he be satisfied, and his Idea established?
A49800And suppose that people should be so unwise, what''s that to others?
A49800Are there none other kind of Governours but these?
A49800But the Question is, what a visible Saint is?
A49800But then the Question is, What he means by Sovereign, what by disobedience to a lawful Sovereign?
A49800But then what is the power of this assembly, either severally considered without the King, or jointly with the King?
A49800But what''s this to purpose?
A49800But, if there was no ordinary power, what must the people do in such a case and distracted condition?
A49800But, whether their Congregations gathered in their manner be this primary Subject, and this according to any precept of Christ?
A49800But, who told him so?
A49800Do not ye judge them that are within?
A49800Doth any man think that these Letters and Messages were sent only to seven Persons, who were Bishops?
A49800Examine whether they be sufficient or no?
A49800For g what have I to do to judge them also that are without?
A49800For they may be subjects, and not primary, they may be subjects of some part, and not of the whole power?
A49800For, what will it avail us to be temporally rich, and spiritually poor: to gain the World and lose our Souls?
A49800How much more if the Monarchs be Children, or Ideots, as some be?
A49800How they are gathered?
A49800How will he prove it?
A49800If there be, Where is it?
A49800If they be not, how can the Church censure, judge them, and cast them out?
A49800If this be so necessary for the defence and safety of an earthly State; how much more is the spiritual Militia necessary for the defence of our Souls?
A49800Let Governments be Governours, and the same Ecclesiastical, will it follow that they were ruling Elders distinct from preaching and ruling Elders?
A49800Nay, how many unworthy and unfit persons do we find entred into the Ministery?
A49800Or shall it not?
A49800Or, if it be such a single Congregation, how will it follow from hence that the power is in this Congregation Democratically?
A49800QVis tandem augustas regnandi digerit artes, Et solidam sceptris commodat Author opem?
A49800Suppose all should do so, especially such as are of parts and ability, what will become of us all?
A49800The Congregational extent: what Congregations are?
A49800The Question therefore is, Whether these and such like are not Members of a Church Christian?
A49800Therefore, when the Apostle saith, Do not ye judge them within?
A49800What Authority was this?
A49800What Divine Institution can be made evident of that, which they say is so universal and ancient?
A49800What is it, how is it defined?
A49800What''s their duty?
A49800Where do we find the Spirit promised only unto Ministers and Bishops?
A49800Whether any can be made Soveraign by condition?
A49800Whether as such, they be such a subject by Divine Institution?
A49800Whether once conferred and received, it can be forfeited?
A49800Whether the late Warlike Resistance made against the King''s party and his Commissions was Rebellion, or no?
A49800Whether they be such subjects of such power in foro exteriori, quatenus Episcopi reduplicative?
A49800Whether this narrow compass be grounded upon Scripture or no?
A49800Whether upon any cause it be lawful for the Subjects to resist, or take up Arms against their lawful Soveraign?
A49800how irrational and absurd is this?
A49800section 10 The second Question is, Whether Majesty acquired can be forfeited?
A49800section 3 But what are the reasons, whereupon this vast power is grounded?
A49800section 8 Whether the warlike resistance made by the Parliament against the King, against his Commissions, against his party was a Rebellion?
A52139''T was well replyed of the English man in Edward the Fourths time, to the French man that ask''d him insulting, When they should see us there again?
A52139And how shall they bring in Popery?
A52139And what great Undertaking could we be ripe for abroad, while so divided at home?
A52139And what part did he play?
A52139Are there no terms of Pradon, Mr. Bayes?
A52139But Mr. Bayes doth not this now look like Sorcery and Extortion, which of all crimes you purge your self from so often without an Accuser?
A52139But now among friends, was there ever any thing so monstrous?
A52139But what do you think of this Man?
A52139But what will you say to that of the Arch- bishops, than either like Philosophers or like Christians?
A52139But what, pray Mr. Bayes, is this Pin in Pallas''s Buckler?
A52139But who shall be the Judg?
A52139But( that I may not offend in Latin too frequently?
A52139But, Mr. Bayes why may not your Answerer or any man else quote St. Austin, as well as you may the Scri ● … re?
A52139Can the refusal of Communion here be thought any other thing than Duty?
A52139Could Mistriss Mopsa her self have furnished you with a more pleasant and worshipful Tale?
A52139Did he like a Protestant Apostle, in one day convert thousands of the Irish Papists?
A52139Do not you think that the King has considered all these things?
A52139Do you not see now, Mr. Bays, that you needed not have gone so for a word, when you might have had it in the Neighbourhood?
A52139Do you think the Christians would have palliated so 〈 ◊ 〉, and colluded with their Consciences?
A52139For who so proper as a young Priest to sacrifice to the Genius of the Age; yea, though his Conscience were the Offering?
A52139Fy, ● … y, Mr. Bayes, Is this the Language of a Divine, and to be used, as you ometimes express it, in the fa ● … of the Sun?
A52139Had he no Friends to have given him good Counsel before his Understanding were quite unsettled?
A52139Hereupon what do they?
A52139How near does this come to his commendation of Bishop Bramhal before?
A52139I would ask in what manner?
A52139If I had leisure how easy a thing it were for to extract out of the Narrative a just parallel of our Author, even almost upon all points?
A52139Is this the same thing now?
A52139It seems that he knowes something more than I did believe of the Design in the late times before the War Whom doth he mean by our Governours?
A52139It wants nothing of perfection, but that it doth not begin with Once upon a time?
A52139Or, would he( with all 〈 ◊ 〉 be it spoken) 〈 ◊ 〉 his Kingdom of England for that of Macassar?
A52139Shall these Men alwayes presume to usur ● … to themselves that venerable stile of the Church of England?
A52139Such as this, Why may not the Soveraign Power bestow this Priviledge upon Ceremony, and Custom, by virtue of its prerogative?
A52139Upon such occasions in company, we use to ask, Sir, Whom d ● … you mean?
A52139Was the Bookseller more Impotunate, or the Author more Courteous?
A52139What Censures, what Excommunications, what Deprivations, what Imprisonments?
A52139What Ignorance, or rat ● … er, what Forgery is this of Scripture& Religio ● …?
A52139What Signal Marks, what Testimonies would he have of this Conversion?
A52139What can I tell thee then but miserie?
A52139What does Mr. Bayes in this case?
A52139What if the gesture or adoration to be used to the Altars, as now we have learned to speak?
A52139What shall he do then?
A52139What was here to inrage our Author so that he must raze the Fort of St. Katherine, and attempt with the same success a second Escalade?
A52139What would they have had more?
A52139When he was drawn t ● … us low, did not 〈 ◊ 〉 you, stand need of tilting?
A52139Where then were all your Leaf- Turners?
A52139Who can escape from thinking that you are adream''d of your Comfortable Importance?
A52139Who could in Reason expect that a Man should in the same moments undertake the labour of an Author and a Father?
A52139Who is there of the Systematical, German Geneva, Orthodox Divines, but could have taught him better?
A52139Why, saith he, must you prescribe me what I shall write?
A52139Would Mr. Bayes then perswade men to assert this against all the Powers of the Earth?
A52139Your next Flower, and that indeed is a sweet one, Dear Heart, how could I hug and kiss thee for all this Love and Sweetness?
A52139and how does this Defence take off the Object ● … on?
A52139is there no time for 〈 ◊ 〉; but, after so ample a confeffion as he hath made, must he now be hang''d too to make good the Proverb?
A52139who is there of the Sober, Intelligent, Episcepal Divines of the Church of England, but would ab ● … or this Interpretation?
A52139why put things in men''s heads they never thought of?
A52139why stirr such an odious, seditious, impertinent, unseasonable discourse?
A52139why take this very minute of t ● … me, but that he hath mischief, to say no worse, in his heart?
A042864 What other thing feared Frederick Barbarossa but Excommuniticaon?
A04286And aboue alll, how frankly and freely did I free Recusants of their ordinary payments?
A04286And as for suppressing of the Scriptures how many hundreth yeeres were the people kept in such blindnesse, as these witnesses were almost vnknowne?
A04286And how could all the Apostles haue otherwise vsed all their censures, only in Christs Name, and neuer a word of his Vicar?
A04286And last of all, by what inspiration could he foretell whereupon hee was to bee accused?
A04286And since Ipse dixit; nay, ter dixit, per quem facta sunt omnia, what mortall man dare interprete him otherwise; nay, directly contrary?
A04286And what blasphemous corrupting of Scripture is it, to turne Dominus into Domina throughout the whole Psalmes?
A04286And what is this to say?
A04286But first we must know what kinde of touching of Christs body drew a vertue from it; whether euery touching, or only touching by faith?
A04286But what cause gaue I him to farce his whole booke with iniuries, both against my person and booke?
A04286But who can wonder at this contradiction of himselfe in this point, when his owne great Volumes are so filled with contradictions?
A04286But whose hatred did he feare in this?
A04286But why should I presume any more to interprete Malachy, since it is sufficient that CHRIST himselfe hath interpreted him so?
A04286Did hee not accept of the conditions to poyson the man, and had his pay?
A04286Doeth he that taketh it, promise there to beleeue, or not to beleeue any article of Religion?
A04286For as for the Catholique faith; can there bee one word found in all that Oath, tending or sounding to matter of Religion?
A04286For if he thinke himselfe my lawfull Iudge, wherefore hath he condemned me vnheard?
A04286For what exampl ● is there in all the Scripture, in which disobedi ● nce to the Oath of the King, or want of allegiance is allowed?
A04286Had not wee then, and our Parliament great reason, by this Oath to set a marke of distinction betweene good Subiects and bad?
A04286Haue I euer importuned the Pope with any request for my securitie?
A04286How free& continual accesse, had all rankes& degrees of Papists in my Court& company?
A04286How indifferently did I giue audience, and accesse to both sides, bestowing equally all fauours and honors on both professions?
A04286How many Emperors did the Pope raise warre against in their owne bowels?
A04286How many did I honour with knighthood, of knowen& open Recusants?
A04286I that in the yeere of GOD 84 erected Bishops, and depressed all their popular Paritie, I then being not 18. yeeres of age?
A04286If the Breues[ of Clement] did not exclude mee from the Kingdome, but rather did include me, why did Garnet burne them?
A04286Is not this to confound CHRISTS person with hers?
A04286Or doeth he so much as name a true or a false Church there?
A04286Or haue I either troubled other Christian Princes my friends& allies, to intreat for me at the Popes hand?
A04286Or yet haue I begged from them any aide or assistance for my farther securitie?
A04286Was neuer Chistian Emperour or King afraid of the Popes?
A04286Was not the a Emperour afraid, who b waited bare- footed in the frost and snow three dayes at the Popes gate, before hee could get entrie?
A04286Was not the c Emperour also afraide, d who was driuen to lie agroofe on his belly, and suffer another Pope to tread vpon his necke?
A04286What certaine information had he then receiued vpon the particulars, whereupon hee was to be accused?
A04286What could hee know, that the said Arch- priest was not taken vpon suspicion of his guiltinesse in the Powder- Treason?
A04286What did k Alexander the third write to the Soldan?
A04286What need such wilde racked Commentaries for such three wordes?
A04286Who haue interest, but KINGS, in the withdrawing of true Subiection from Kings?
A04286f Augustine speaking of Iulian, saith, Iulian was an vnbeleeuing Emperour: was he not an Apostata, an Oppressour, and an Idolater?
A04286f Quis me constituit Iudicem super vos?
A04286was it not yours?
A04286why would he not reserue them that I might haue seene them, that so he might haue obtained more fauour at mine hands, for him and his Catholickes?
A06517& in turpitudinem vestram, etiam vel nomen nominare?
A065171645?
A0651717. saying: When thou wast a little one in thine owne eyes, wast thou not made head in the Tribes of Israel?
A065176. saith: Quis dubitat& c. Who doubteth, but that the Priests of Christ are to be accompted the Fathers, and maisters of Kinges, and princes?
A06517Againe I demaund, what meane these words, Pasce oues meas, feed my flocke?
A06517And is it not impudencie, to diuulge in print againe and againe this their shamefull ignominy, nor yet heereby to feare their publicke infamie?
A06517And is it so indeed?
A06517And is this in your Chapell, to be sincere indeed?
A06517And lastly, if you would haue done so, why haue you not spared others?
A06517And to this end, that he should heare or interpret nothing with the left, but all with the right eare?
A06517And what new thing is this now I pray you?
A06517And what, I pray you, is this, then as much to say, that the King of England is wise, and the rest are fooles?
A06517And why so?
A06517But do you not see that this may be in like manner retorted backe vpon your King?
A06517But how can this be?
A06517But if it be so, why doth not the Church of England giue this power to the King, her Head, and Primate?
A06517But if you be desirous of truth( as it becommed you to haue byn;) why did you not examine the matter first, before you wrote it downe?
A06517But stay, my friend; who be they with vs that teach this doctrine?
A06517But what if in like manner I should say of your King?
A06517But what is this to the Primacy of the Church?
A06517But, how if the Religion be false which he hath sworne to mantaine?
A06517Do you not feare least the Church should be double headed, if not Christ alone, but your King also be head thereof?
A06517Do you thinke so indeed?
A06517First it is nothing so: and secondly if it had byn so: what?
A06517For why?
A06517He hath force and strength, the rest are weake and impotent?
A06517Heere I demaund( I say) whether your King hath lawfully and prudently exhorted them to do it, or no?
A06517How then can they, being deuided amongst thēselues, agree with your King?
A06517How then is it due by all Right?
A06517If he hath done it lawfully and prudently, why do you accuse the Catholickes, who do but the like in a better cause?
A06517If there be no others, besids those you haue named before, wherefore did you then call them a part,& not the whole flocke of Christ?
A06517If there be others, why then did you not name them?
A06517If you affirme, yea, how proue you it?
A06517Nonne cùm peruulus esses in oculis tuis, caput in tribubus Israel factus es?
A06517Now I demaund, if the Puritans detest this Primacy, how do they then sweare thus sincerely thereunto?
A06517Or whether are you the first that haue reuealed this mistery to the Christian world?
A06517Or who did euer affirme it before your selfe?
A06517Potestas haec ibi, cui data?
A06517Quid enim?
A06517Quis Christianus Rex esse velit?
A06517Quis non dehin ● iem( sic vt est) manebit Ethnicus?
A06517Quis non subditos suos malit Ethnicos quàm Christianos?
A06517Say, my friend, speake you this in iest or in earnest?
A06517Shall he persist rather in his false Religion, then breake his oath?
A06517Tell me, I pray you, in Christes time, when the new Law was instituted, were these two Kingdomes deuided, or were they one?
A06517The iurisdiction of the externall Court, where is it founded in the Ghospell?
A06517Thirdly I demand, why do not other Christian Kinges take vpon them this Pastorall office, if they be truly Pastors of Christs flocke?
A06517This power there, to whome was it giuen?
A06517VVhat?
A06517Vos qui fidem non seruandam, i d est, perfidiam licitam, legitimamque docetis; etiámne vos quicquam de perfidia audetis hiscere?
A06517Was not one Tortus inough for you to torture, vnlesse with the like liberty you railed vpon others also?
A06517We all dayly see with our eyes this Mystery of Antichrist: And are you the only man in England that seeth it not& c?
A06517What can you heere now deny?
A06517What euasion then can you heere haue?
A06517What get you by this?
A06517What shall he then do?
A06517What would you do if your King should say, that the Religiō is false which he now professeth?
A06517What?
A06517What?
A06517Wherfore then dare you be so saucy to speake thus to the Pope, but for that you list to raile vpon him?
A06517Who will not hēceforward now( if he be so) remayne still an Ethnicke?
A06517Who would be a Christian King?
A06517Who would not then haue his subiects Ethnickes rather then Christians?
A06517Why do you then dissemble?
A06517Why so?
A06517Will you depose Peter from his Pastorall office, who was ordayned therto by Christ, and suborne your King, who was not ordained by Christ?
A06517Will you still chaunt your wonted songe, That the Puritans, what they do, they do sincerely?
A06517Will you then that the Primacy Ecclesiastical be due to kings by all these kindes of Right?
A06517Would you persuade him to forsake his false Religion,& imbrace the true?
A06517Would you vrge him vpon his oath?
A06517Yf he be no waie inferiour vnto him; how can he then be excommunicated or punished by him?
A06517do you not thinke it lawfull for him to change his Religion, if he haue sworne he will not do it?
A06517do you thinke it the part of a Christian man to requite euill with euill?
A06517or to name the thing to your owne shame?
A06517or who be those others?
A35015''T is not who dares say, but who may lawfully or ought to do it, with Impunity?
A35015And is there nothing due for so high a Favour?
A35015And shall not we interchangably use the duties of common Humanity to them of the Roman Religion?
A35015And what did any Nation ever get by Rebellion, but expence of Treasure and Blood, Rapine, Misery and Ruine?
A35015And what have they done since to incense the King or the Government, or their fellow Subjects against them?
A35015And whilst the Case stands thus, what need will there be of sanguinary Laws for Imprisonment during Life, or Consiscation of Goods?
A35015And why will they make more bold with a Christian Prince, and their Lawful Sovereign, than with an Insided?
A35015Are not their Practices the great shame and confutation of their Professions?
A35015Are these the Men that pray for Peace, or do they ever mean to purchase it?
A35015Are they impatient with all who do not see with their Eyes?
A35015But how is our Religion given away by your consent to that, which your dissent can not hinder?
A35015But who now can plausibly suspect their Faithfulness to the present King, or that they will be backward in his Service?
A35015Can not we abhor Idols, without flying into his Face, who is the Image of God upon Earth?
A35015Can we have so little Wit and Loyalty who pretend to so much of both?
A35015Can you have any better Precedents than those of the Kings of Judah?
A35015Could there be such needless and endless Contentions among them, if they were not carnal?
A35015Did not St. Paul become all thing to all Men, that he might by all means gain some?
A35015Did we take up the Cross to lay it upon other Mens Shoulders?
A35015Do not Turks and Jews and some Sectaries, who are worse than either, live quietly among us; and why then must our Brethren of Rome be molested?
A35015Does not the Prince of Peace oblige his Disciples, If it be possible, and as much as in them lies, to live peaceably with all Men?
A35015Does not this incontinency of Disputing make Rents in the seamless Garment, rather than Reformation?
A35015Does this express our Duty or Gratitude to God or Him?
A35015Into what shameless Straits will this immodesty of ours reduce us?
A35015Is Christianity become an Enemy to Humanity, and turn''d Incendiary?
A35015Is Zeal grown such a Cormorant as to eat up Charity?
A35015Is he not Head of the Church?
A35015Is it not as fit the King should choose his Ministers, as we our Servants?
A35015Is it not the same case with us too?
A35015Is it sit to say to a King, Thou art Wicked, and to Princes, Ye are Vngodly?
A35015Is not the Church of Rome a true Church, both in it self and in our Judgment too?
A35015Is not this rather the ready course to create in him, and all the World besides, an ill Opinion of us and our Religion?
A35015Is this their brotherly Kindness, Meekness, or good Manners?
A35015Is this to keep Innocence, and to take heed to the thing that that is Right?
A35015Is this to provide things honest in the sight of all Men?
A35015Is this to sight under Christ''s Banner, who was the Prince of Peace?
A35015Or for those Tests which exclude the Peers of the Romish Religion from sitting in the House of Lords according to their Birth- right?
A35015Or how many have you seen heal''d by being lead into these troubled Waters, though mov''d by the best Angels of the Church?
A35015Or is it not rather a wounding of Christianity it self to the very Heart?
A35015Or those in Practice, except they be such as are destructive of humane Society?
A35015Remember that of Lactantius, Quae, ubi, aut qualis est Pietas?
A35015Security for their Persons and Estates, and Rewards wards for their Services?
A35015Shall the Privileges which he and his Royal Predecessors have granted us, be us''d as Weapons to fight and rebel against him?
A35015Shall we deprive him of his Prerogative, which the Law of God, as well as of the Land, has given him?
A35015Shall we, who have hitherto endeavoured to strengthen the hands of the Magistrate, now strive to weaken them?
A35015The Laws made against Roman Catholicks, are either as Rebels or Papists: If as Rebels, what need of particular Laws for them more than others?
A35015Were they not our fellow Souldiers and Sufferers too?
A35015What Reputation can he have abroad, or what Reverence at home?
A35015What if some few of them shew more heat than becomes them, and grasp at things not sit for their Enjoyment?
A35015What if they are displeased for not enjoying as much of the benefit of the King''s Restauration as we do?
A35015What is all this, but Sedition under disguise of Zeal?
A35015What safety can our Sovereign expect, if he can not be allow''d the free Exercise of his own Religion without his Subjects repining?
A35015Why are Men more inrag''d against those who agree with them in most things, than with them who different from them in all?
A35015Why not the same Law to punish them and others guilty of the same Treason?
A35015Why should the indiscretion of a few incense us against the rest?
A35015Why should we grudge his Majesty''s Mercy to others, which we reckon so great a Blessing to our selves?
A35015Why should we shew so much Violence in these Points, of which we can have no certain Evidence?
A35015Why then should they not have room in his Kingdoms?
A35015Would not their Congregations be more edified by the Church- Catechism than a Controversie?
A35015and is not the Name of God blasphem''d through their Miscarriages?
A35015and must his Members teach him how to govern it?
A35015and where is their Religion?
A35015and will they set themselves in battle array against all who are not Wise enough to be of their Judgments, and damn all who are not of their Opinions?
A35015or do we fellow Christ:, as the Jews did, to Crucisie him?
A35015what respect ought the true sons of the Church of England... to bear to the religion of that church, whereof the King is a member?
A35015what respect ought the true sons of the Church of England... to bear to the religion of that church, whereof the King is a member?
A35015will you neither be obedient for Wrath nor yet for conscience sake?
A67146''T will prove as vast a difference, and as vile, set them once together, as is the Picture of a Dog to the Image of a Man; Can they not relish this?
A6714623. and Why forgettest Thou Our misery?
A6714634. and who dare now go contrary?
A671467. and what was that?
A67146A lie there?
A67146A word very unadvisedly( by their good leaves) here used; Else, why was it then at the Reformation, turn''d out of Latin?
A67146Alas, how easily is this put by?
A67146And he has another Question about it also, that would be a little thought on, Is there not a Lie in my Right Hand?
A67146And how say you then?
A67146And how then?
A67146And how think you of this now?
A67146And must it go for His Covenant, that is so flatly against Him?
A67146And now what of them?
A67146And shall not then a consent of all the People be Sacred?
A67146And t is well we are, That we have a sufficient warrant by that; Otherwise perhaps we might be to seek, How to bring both ends together ▪ What?
A67146And what can be more?
A67146And what would we more?
A67146And why?
A67146And why?
A67146And yet for the while then, who but He?
A67146Arrant Assirians of a sudden to become so very holy?
A67146As the times long have gone, to be in a Covenant, and yet not to behave our selves perversly?
A67146BUt how then?
A67146Baal Berith a God?
A67146Because they never would think with themselves, Is there not a lie in my Right Hand?
A67146But how can that be the Case now among us?
A67146But how though did they it?
A67146But how was that?
A67146But is not this strange?
A67146But that, they so well knew to be His, Given by Him alone, and not taken up by men( no new Humane, Forgery shall I call it?
A67146But then among them of Judah also, those few that were no such Changelings, What became of them?
A67146But what shall we need to go further then the Text for it?
A67146But what talk we of promise?
A67146But who can help that?
A67146But yet, How shall we find it, Who they are?
A67146By the way then upon this, shall we not desire, that our godly Brethren would shew us, whether he be the same God, still?
A67146Damnation to them, that joyned not in such a Duty, How should other Men be able to Judge it?
A67146Did they so?
A67146Do you not see, how the Holy Spirit used it, even when the Name of God is joyned to it?
A67146Does it not shoulder His Covenant?
A67146Does this suit right?
A67146Find they any such medlies in Scripture, but of their good Brethren, the Samaritans?
A67146Find you any Lying at all, either in the Device, or in the Carriage of it?
A67146Gods Covenant point blank against Gods Anointed?
A67146How must this be unriddled?
A67146How so?
A67146How then?
A67146How?
A67146I should but trouble your memories, and tire you out, if I should draw you here to the several parcels of Moses Law?
A67146In the Name of God then, Who are these?
A67146Is any thing said there, in that Covenant, that you see is not, never was, intended?
A67146Is it not set up against God?
A67146Is it not?
A67146Is not, I pray, the same term of Covenanting given in Scripture to the vilest of all Gods Enemies?
A67146Is one thing said, and quite another thing done?
A67146Now God forbid: Why not?
A67146Now a''Gods name, what''s that?
A67146Now the Reason of all this, what is it, but thus?
A67146Oh, is that it?
A67146Or rather, clean contrary, very much of it, such as God abhorrs, so flat against Godliness, Loyalty, Justice, and Truth?
A67146Pactum Iuum, therefore they were still able to say to God, and not Pactum Nostrum?
A67146Perceive you nothing then?
A67146Say then, Find you false pretending in it?
A67146Shall we need any more?
A67146Such a one( not to name him now; though who knows not many thousand such Ones?)
A67146The Resolution of whole Nations much more be counted so, and without any Question be set upon Gods score?
A67146This was very well, was it not?
A67146To have any Engagement upon us, and yet not to deal falsly?
A67146Tryal by the Country, in this?
A67146Was God also at the making of it?
A67146What Covenant?
A67146What Logick call they This?
A67146What a notable Precedent for this have ye in the Prophet Jeremy?
A67146What means He by that?
A67146What shall we need more?
A67146What to do?
A67146What was His Name, that had power to call them to it, and to require it of them?
A67146Where are we now?
A67146Which of them sate at the Tables head for Him: Who was Gods Deputy in it?
A67146Which way should one of a Thousand among the People be able to tell himself, Whether it were the Covenant of God or no?
A67146Will any plead Ignorance in it?
A67146Will they be able to shew you, they have put nothing in their Covenant, but what was there of old, to be readily found in the Word and Will of God?
A67146Will you any more?
A67146[ Up Lord, why sleepest Thou?
A67146or rather idolatry, made, as Idols use ever to be, after some resemblance of Gods Covenant, and coloured very like it?)
A67146sits cheek by joll with it?
A67146who are They that speak this?
A5785422, 23. that he might have occasion to teach the People: but did he offer a Sacrifice, or observe any other rite or Custome of the Feast?
A57854?
A57854?
A57854And to deny this, what is it, but to make the supream Magistrate head of the Church and not a Member of it?
A57854As some may write for their way, when they will,( as I have said) why should others neglect the year of Release, which falls out but once in an Age?
A57854But how absurd this is, sad Experience maketh too evident: Is it not a Controversie whether Christ hath appointed seven or but two Sacramentst?
A57854But how proveth he this Assertion?
A57854But how proveth he this his conclusion?
A57854But what if it be revealed, so as it is visible to them who read and search attentively; though it be not clearly revealed?
A57854Doth it follow, the Apostles imitated the Jews in the matter of Church- Government, Ergo, we are not obliged to imitate the Apostles?
A57854Doth not this same inconvenience follow if the matter be a private Injury?
A57854Had it not been as requisite to have charged him to have committed his power of Government to them,& c.?
A57854How shall it be proved, that Maintenance is not due to Ruling- Elders, or the seniores plebis, as Blondel calleth them?
A57854If Christ hath made no difference between these( and if he hath it should have been produced) how dare men do it?
A57854If another ask, why the lists are entered so late, after 20 years silence?
A57854If any demand why a posthumous piece shall need to be anonymous too?
A57854If the faithfulness of Moses did ly in keeping Gods command, about Church- Government; how is he only spoken of as a Typical Mediator?
A57854In this we do not contradict him, as appeareth from what is now said: Quere non respondes ad rem?
A57854Is it contrary to Gospel- perfection to be under the Commands of Christ as to a Form of Church Goment, and to be ruled by a way of his contriving?
A57854Is this the easie dispatch of this Argument which was promised?
A57854May not, I pray, the Pastors of the Church debar him, if he be a flagitious man, from the Lord''s Table, as Ambrose did to Theodosius?
A57854Might not a prohibition by Consequence serve turn?
A57854Might there not be a College of Presbyters then as well as now?
A57854Must we say that neither way is commanded of God, whether it be so or not?
A57854Now it is not imaginable, that all the Bishops of Judea were met together on this occasion: for what needed such a Convention for receiving Alms?
A57854Now what is this to the Parity or imparity of Ministers?
A57854Or are there any things such?
A57854Secondly, he derogateth from the Kingdom of Christ, denying that which is a considerable part of the exercise of his Kingly Office: What?
A57854The third is falsly asserted: are not the Levites appointed to superintend that work when they are made the Publick Teachers of the People?
A57854What a pittiful come off is this?
A57854What better Note can we have to know what is a Mans Office; than his work which he is ordinarily employed in, and that with God''s own approbation?
A57854What can he design by this Discourse?
A57854What doth this help his Cause?
A57854What great matter is gained if the wilful party will not hear this advising Church our Author dreameth of?
A57854What if Christ hath in Scripture signified his will in a point, and yet these Churches looked on it, and used it as a thing indifferent?
A57854What is it I pray to say they were mortiferae, but that it was sin to use them?
A57854What is there in our case that maketh another kind of Government needful, then what was needful in the Apostles times?
A57854What is this to their parity or imparity?
A57854What?
A57854What?
A57854What?
A57854Why not then, that they have the Supream ruling Power in Church affairs?
A57854and elsewhere, concerning Church- Administration, do not concern us; but their force expired with that time?
A57854and how is Christ''s faithfulness compared with this faithfulness of Moses, seeing he received no such command?
A57854had heard from Paul: why then must we here understand the one, rather then the other?
A57854hath he so soon forgot himself?
A57854his bare Assertion?
A57854must such things be slighted, as no part of Gods will?
A57854must we then think it indifferent?
A57854often Washing: shall we think, I say, that he had such pleasure in these things?
A57854when we can prove from Scripture that this is Christ''s Institution, that not, but a device aud usurpation of men; must we yield this our ground?
A57854whether he hath commanded us to pray to Saints departed?
A66113And how far the Prince is obliged by it?
A66113And if there be, What that Law is?
A66113And now, upon the whole matter, let this Gentleman freely say, What he has to except against, in the Conduct of this Great Prince?
A66113And what can any, Abroad, or at Home, desire, either the Church, or Her Ministers should do more?
A66113And, How far the Prince is obliged by it?
A66113And, if there be, What that Law is?
A66113And, if there be, What that Law is?
A66113Are They not still free to deliberate, conferr, resolve, for all that?
A66113But however, what can a Convocation do in this Case?
A66113But still the question is, Whether, of Right, the Convocation ever had a power to judge, any more than to make Canons, without the King''s Assent?
A66113But what Proof do''s he bring of this Odious Conspiracy, as far as the Church is concern''d in it?
A66113But what is there then in this Act, to the purpose of our present Enquiry?
A66113But what is there then, in this case, for a Convocation to do?
A66113But what then shall we say of our Factions, and our Divisions; our Resentments and Animosities; our Interests, and our Designs?
A66113But will this Author from thence conclude, That they have an Equal Right to his Estate, and ought Equally to succeed in it?
A66113But, to allow of the supposed Parallel, between the Parliament, and Convocation; What will this Gentleman inferr from it?
A66113By what Authority they were held?
A66113By whom the Convocation, in these times, was wo nt to be Called?
A66113For how came the King to grant this Allowance to them?
A66113For what tho''the King do''s propose to them the Subject of their Debates; What they are to consult about; and draw up their Resolutions upon?
A66113Has Christ been thus long preach''d among Us, to leave it still in doubt, whether, after all, our Church, be a Christian Church, or No?
A66113How do''s that appear?
A66113How far our Kings, during this Period, continued to transact the Affairs of the Church, in their Great Councils?
A66113How far the Prince is at liberty to examine their Determinations; to confirm, annul, or amend them?
A66113How the Arch- bishop of Canterbury gave the next shock to it?
A66113How the Convocation came to bè summon''d at, or about, the same time, with the Parliament?
A66113How the Pope now began to send his Legats hither; and by that means encroach''d upon the King''s Prerogative in the business before us?
A66113I go on( 2dly) To consider, What Authority He has over Them, when They are Assembled?
A66113I proceed( 2dly) To enquire, What Power he has to direct their Debates, when they are Assembled?
A66113I will consider, Whether our Kings have not the same Authority over our Convocation, that all other Christian Princes have claim''d over their Synods?
A66113Is a Counsellor at Law of no use; or has he no freedom of Opinion, because his Client puts his Case to Him?
A66113Nay, but we must go farther; Therefore, of right, it ought to meet now, whenever the Parliament do''s?
A66113Of the Nature of our Great Councils, in these times, and how Ecclesiastical Affairs were transacted in them?
A66113Or has Protested against it?
A66113Or has ventured to proceed to Conferr, Deliberate, and Make Canons, without the King''s Licence first Obtain''d, to Warrant them so to do?
A66113Or lastly, Whether the Archbishop alone does properly judge; and the rest concurr, as Assistants, to him, and assent to what he does?
A66113Or what more could a Convocation, were it to meet tomorrow, Do?
A66113Or what they might make of their proceeding?
A66113Or whether, upon a true State of this Matter, He will espouse the Cause of the Archbishop and Clergy?
A66113Or, Whether we are to look upon it to have forbidden Them, to debate, and conclude upon any; without his Licence, first had, so to do?
A66113The First Question brought to its true State?
A66113The Question, to be examin''d, is thus proposed by Him: What Occasion there is, at present for a Convocation?
A66113Was it because they had a Right to demand it; Or, that He had no Right to refuse it?
A66113Well, what follows?
A66113What Authority our Kings have over their Convocations; after they have done what they were called for?
A66113What shall we say of Those new Schisms which These have produced?
A66113What the Author of the Letter,& c. has offered to prove that it is necessary a Convocation should now meet?
A66113Whether as Prohibiting the Clergy only to Promulge and Execute any Canons,& c. but what are Confirm''d by the King?
A66113Whether he is to be judged by the Votes of the two Houses?
A66113Whether he may Alter and Correct their Definitions?
A66113Whether our Own Kings, have not as Great an Authority over their Convocations; as any Other Princes have ever pretended to, over their Councils?
A66113Whether the Church has any Original, Inherent Right, of its Own, to Assemble Synods?
A66113Whether the Convocation, as a Court, may proceed to judge any Cause without the King''s Licence?
A66113Whether the Convocation, as it now stands, be any part of the Parliament?
A66113Whether there be any Law that commands or permits, the sitting and acting of the Convocation, besides the absolute and free Pleasure of the Prince?
A66113Which being settled, I will, Secondly, Consider, What Occasion there is at present for a Convocation?
A66113Who can tell what the Opinion of the Temporal Judges in such a Case might be?
A66113Will not their Resolutions be their Own, because the King declared to them the General Matter upon which they were to consult?
A66113Yet what has our Church to answer for in this Case?
A66113or, whehe is to be judged by the upper House alone, and the lower to stand in the nature of Prosecutors against him?
A66113§ 10, 11, 12 Of the Ecclesiastical Synods of these Times; Of what Persons they consisted?
A66113§ 28,& c. How far the Prince, thus presiding, may act synodically with his Clergy?
A66113— By what degrees it did so?
A66113— How it judged?
A66113— How our Great Councils Met, and Acted, at the beginning of this Establishment?
A66113— What Power he has over their Judgments?
A66113— What over their Constitutions?
A66113— What place, from thenceforth, the Inferiour Clergy had in it?
A66113— What that State was?
A66113— Whether One may not be held without the Other?
A91309( to which the Commons never consented ▪ were made and 〈 ◊ 〉 to that purpose, as is evident by the very words of the Acts themselves?
A91309* Of what 〈 ◊ 〉 is your ● ● ● plesse?
A91309975. assembled to determine the great controversie, whether married Clerkes ought to bee preferred before monkes?
A91309After this, the King demanded of him, from what Pope he would receive his Pall?
A91309And what then becomes of our Parliaments Authority, and legislative power, if this kind of logick be admitted?
A91309And why should the Parliament take this from either?
A91309But of this I shall thinke some other time, and adds by way of scoffe; but thou, whence speakest thou in a Councell?
A91309But when wee demand of them how they prove it?
A91309But( deare Brother) what will you say if none of these Scriptures prove any such conclusion, but the contrary?
A91309Can such jealousies as these issued from any but a rancorous or disaffected heart against Parliaments?
A91309Did the Parliament ever give you the least colour or occasion of any such uncharitable, unchristian, that I say not detestable jealousie?
A91309Did they tarry many moneths about it?
A91309Ergo now there ought to be such an Independent absolute Church in every family?
A91309Estne rationi congruum ● t in Synodo historiae innitantur?
A91309Is he therefore carelesse, or unfaithfull?
A91309Now was the great Law- giver so strict under the Old Testament, and is hee growne over remisse under the New?
A91309Now what, Brother, is this private case of conscience to one set forme of Church Disciplin or Government?
A91309Or in what Text he can shew me any particular Independent Church stiled, Christs spirituall Kingdom and Republike?
A91309Or shall none adventure to marry a good wife or husband, because so many have met with bad?
A91309Or to Arch- bishops, and Bishops only as such?
A91309Palladius saith there likewise, Imperator noster Gratianus jussit Orientales venire, negas tu jussisse e ● m?
A91309Quisnam est Autor hujus voluminis?
A91309Shall they be Hereticks presently for such a choise, as x you define them?
A91309Should we suffer all things to go to ruine with him?
A91309What if they should be for Popery again, Judaisme, or Turcisme?
A91309What then, Brother, will you inferre from this sole Church in Abrahams family, to our Churches now?
A91309Whether they were necessarily tied to make privat contributions, only on the first day of the week& no other?
A91309Why then came your Embassadours to the Emperour?
A91309doth the Apostle say; that this he ordained to be the very same in all Churches?
A91309enough to fire the whole Kingdome against them, as well as Gods wrath?
A91309had they Bishops?
A91309had they Divines and the most learned to reason too and fro with all Liberty,& c.?
A91309had ye any pla ● e at all in it?
A91309have you not then injured the Readers, and truth hereby?
A91309or carelesse of the Church under the Law, because he gave them not the Gospel then, but Law alone?
A91309or had they not a liberty notwithstanding this order to do it on any other week day, as wel as on the first?
A91309or had ye any thing to do in that assembly?
A91309or how they make good all their transcendent Encomiums of their New Way?
A91309or in what plaine Scripture Texts they find it instituted and universally prescribed to all Nations, Churches?
A91309or to ruling Elders as well as they, or to the[ †] whol Church or Congregation, and such as they shall appoint?
A91309or what that Way, Government, and Discipline is they contend for?
A91309or whether it be but an arbitrary ceremony which may be omitted without prejudice, if there be cause?
A91309or whether it obliged all other Churches then, or simply binds all Churches now to this forme of preparatory or privat contributions, or not?
A91309to be the spirituall Kingdome of Christ,& c. whole onely King, Governour, Head, is Christ and not man?
A91309were ye admitted within the doores?
A91309whether it be appropriated to Preaching Elders onely, as such?
A91309whether it belonged to the Apostles onely as Apostles, or as Presbyters?
A91309why made they him the Iudge of their cause?
A91309yea, is it not an higher strain of spirituall pride and uncharitable Behaviour against your brethren then ever the Donatists or Nouatians broached?
A91309yea, which of them did not resist it, save 〈 ◊ 〉 alone& c?
A28174& c. Do not we sell the truth and Cause and all into the hands of the Enemies of all?
A28174All the Question will be, what is that Rule?
A28174And Ahab King of Israel said unto Iehoshaphat King of Iudah, with thow go with me to Ramoth- Gilead?
A28174And do they not put the Godly in their place?
A28174And hath not faithfull men avoyded the one as well as the other?
A28174And have not obeyed the voice of my teachers nor enclined mine ear to them that instructed me?
A28174And have they so soon Learned to doe well, who have been so accustomed to doe evil?
A28174And if we should esteem Gods enemies our enemies, and hate them with perfect hatred, how can we then joyn with them as friends?
A28174And now what hast thow to do in the way of Assyria to drink the Waters of the River?
A28174And say how have I hated instruction, and my heart despised reproof?
A28174And what Concord hath Christ with Belial?
A28174And who will say there was no moe men in Israel, when they had 600000 such, and above, before their coming into the Land?
A28174Are not all bound to come to the Sacrament who are Church members?
A28174Are they not, by the appointment of Gods Law, ordained for destruction and hast to it?
A28174Are we not all bound by Covenant, to endeavour to bring Malignants to Condigne punishment, and to look on them as enemies?
A28174Be there not many who oppose the Kingdom of Jesus Christ and Work of Reformation?
A28174Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteouness with unrighteousness?
A28174But how far is this diminished?
A28174But these that go to them return not again quickly; they are like fallen starrs, shall they ever be set in the Firmament again?
A28174But what ane evil time are we now fallen into, that the union of these in this point, is the complaint of many of the Godly?
A28174But what shall we do for the hundred talents which I have given to the Army of Israel?
A28174But when it is joyned with Envy and Malice against Godliness and Piety it self, who can stand before that?
A28174Can a Leopard change his Spots?
A28174Can a man take fire in his bosom and his Cloaths not be burnt?
A28174Can it be said in good earnest, that none, of whom is any suspition, shall have such trust as may be prejudiciall?
A28174Can men expect other fruits from a tree than the nature of it yeelds?
A28174Can one go on hot Coals and not burn his feet?
A28174Can our STATES way then please the Lord, seing they can not find the way of Peace?
A28174Can their going before me in the transgression, exempt me from the transgression of that same Law which obliges both them and me?
A28174Can then, men change their way, and go cross to it, and keep the right way in both?
A28174Can they be accounted reall friends of the Cause who are knoun to favour it only ad nutum Principis?
A28174Can they think us men of Conscience, that will join with all these men of blood, before we will so much as speak with them?
A28174Did not that mixture provoke God at Dumbar?
A28174Do we mock God as one mocks another?
A28174Doe they not pronounce all Malignants friends, and absolve them from the sentences and Classes they stand under?
A28174From whom I pray you?
A28174Had it not been a transgression in all the people to have joyned with these men before the Parliaments Resolution about it?
A28174Hath the act of Indemnity and Pardon such Influence, to Justify these men from all their Butcheries and Barbarous Cruelties?
A28174Hath there not been alwayes in the Land secret underminers as well as open Enemies?
A28174How doth that aggree with our sparing of bloody men, of our solliciting for their Impunity, of our pardoning them?
A28174How many have watched all opportunities for troubling the peace of the Kingdom, and rejoyced in the day of its Calamity?
A28174How many men of blood, Murderers of their brethren, as unnaturall and barbarous as the Irishes they once joyned with against their Countrey?
A28174How many were the Oppressors of these who Called on the Lords Name in the time of the Engadgment?
A28174How often hath it been Confessed to God, as the predominant Publick sin of Scotland, Countenancing and Employing the Malignant Partie?
A28174How then can their Resolution interveening, loose the people from their obligation to Gods Command?
A28174If any wise man be ubique& semper sibi pay& idem, what ought a Godly man to be?
A28174If it be but more honour and wealth to our King, Should we destroy the Kingdom to purchase that?
A28174If this be of truth, as it is indeed; We may say, who hath heard such a thing?
A28174Is it not a matter of Offence and stumbling to them, to be necessitated by Law to that which was their affliction?
A28174Is it not all one to follow the Cause for the King and for a mans oun Interest and advantage?
A28174Is the Act of levie a scattering of the wicked?
A28174It s not according to mens words but works they should be judged, and why do not we follow that Rule in our Judging?
A28174May they not have ground fothink, that we are but driving on a politick design and does not singly aim at Gods Glory?
A28174Most men will proclaim every one his oun goodness: but a faithfull man who can find?
A28174Nay, are there not moe persons not formerly secluded in all these Shyres?
A28174Now what did the Subject then engadge unto?
A28174Of such the Lord says, what hast thow to do to take my Covenant in thy mouth; seing thow hates to be reformed?
A28174Or how can thow eschew it if thow walk with them?
A28174Or, at the best, it is uncertain: for what is more uncertain than the event of War?
A28174Ought not his people to do so to?
A28174Power and greatness hath Corrupted many good men, shall it Convert them?
A28174Professing they know God, in works they deny him& c. Ver 8, To give a mad man a weapon, what els is it but to murder?
A28174Shall a Nation be born at once?
A28174Shall it be no sin to me, because they sin before me?
A28174Shall not they be induced, to put no difference between the pretious and the vile?
A28174Should any then stay them?
A28174Should we thus choose our oun Plague, Tyranny, Oppression, Calamity and Misery: and cast away our oun glorie?
A28174Since they follow the Cause, not for it self but for the King, will they not desert it when the King forsakes it?
A28174Suppose the Enemies Armie to Consist of 20000 or above, Are there not moe sensible persons in the Shyres on the North side of Forth?
A28174The Godly discountenanced and discouraged?
A28174Their heart studies the destruction of the Godly, why then should thow walk with thine Enemy?
A28174Then, how will it Confirm all the Malignant party in their wickednesse?
A28174Then, what a great difference is between wicked men and Godly men, both in their Lot, when God is Correcting both?
A28174These whom that SACRED BOND OF COVENANT hath not tyed, what oath can bind?
A28174To fast a day for that as the Kings sin, which they must go about to morrow as their oun Duty?
A28174Was not the foundation of it laid in Holland?
A28174Was not the work of purging Judicatories and Armies obstructed?
A28174What can we expect but utter destruction and that without Remedie, as we sentenced our selves?
A28174What hast thow to doe in the way of Egypt& c.?
A28174What is more certain than that men act and speak from the Abundance of the heart, when there is no outward restraint?
A28174What made Israel and Iudah, run to Egypt and Assyria for help, but their weakness and necessitie?
A28174What may they judge of the inconstancy and levity of the Commission?
A28174What may they think within themselves, to see such dissonancy and disagreement between present and former Resolutions and Practises?
A28174What meant the Levie appointed immediately after Dumbar?
A28174What multitudes of profane and Ungodly mockers of all Godlinesse and Haters and Persecuters of the Godly, suarming every where?
A28174What needs men make such a Compasse to Justifie the Publick Resolutions, seing there is so easy and ready a way straight at hand?
A28174When Iehoshaphat was reproved for helping the ungodly, was not all his people reproved that went with him?
A28174When did this Catholick Conversion fall out?
A28174Whether there be yet in Scotland a Malignant Partie?
A28174Who hath seen such a thing?
A28174Why did the Commission expresse the exceptions in such terms, as to mens common Apprehension do not include many?
A28174Will one seek figs on thorns, or grapes on thistles?
A28174],[ Edinburgh?
A28174and by what means?
A28174and look hencforth on them as friends without so much as any ackowledgment of their sin had from them?
A28174and what Communion hath Light with darknesse?
A28174great endeavours used to raise the Malignants in the South and in England, and since the Defeat to raise all without exception in the North?
A28174not to discern between him that fears God and him that fears him not, when the publick Resolutions puts no difference?
A28174or what part hath he that believeth with an Infidel?
A28174should they not then far less employ them?
A28174was not 10000 Foot and 1400 Horse put upon these Shyres which are not under the power of the Enemy?
A17976& vt plus dicam, mancipium, qui potest eum nutu nostro incarcerare& ignominiae mancipare?
A17976?
A17976Against the Popes pretensed Iurisdiction, what can wee say more, then hath beene already concluded by these Councels?
A17976And because Baro ● … ius asketh this question, whence came so many Bishoppes and Abbots of a sudden?
A17976And call you this a command?
A17976And shall it be thought strange in vs now, to maintaine the same truth, which then these worthy men durst maintaine?
A17976And so he departed, Omnibus clamantibus, saith mine Author, quo progrederis prodi ● … er?
A17976And they that led vs captiues aske vs, where was our Church then?
A17976And to breake out against the constitutions of Canons?
A17976And what hath M. Luther done, but that which Grosthead was prouoked to do?
A17976And what holdeth the Spaniard so stiffe in Popery, but onely an hope that by the Popes authority he may inlarge his Dominions in the same sort?
A17976And what is a King by nature, but the father of a great family?
A17976And what is more forcible to steale away the hearts of subiects from their Prince, then to binde them with an Oath of Allegeance to another Prince?
A17976And whence should so many Bishoppes and Abbots be so soone gotten together?
A17976And whether the ground of their Iurisdiction be not hence drawen?
A17976And why dare you make vse of such forgeries?
A17976And why did they claime it by a Canon of the Councell, when they might haue laid their claime directly from the commaundement of Christ?
A17976And,[ Simon louest thou mee?
A17976Aperite oculos& videte, qualis ex hoc daretur ingressus Antichristo?
A17976Are these Christs Vicars?
A17976Baronius denieth that Pope Leo wrote so, as Gratian cyteth him: what authority can be produced to satisfie these men?
A17976But he proceedeth, and asketh how this Councel should be called of a sudden?
A17976But if these Epistles were not then extant( as certainely they were not) why should any credit bee giuen to things so manifestly forged?
A17976But was not Bishoppe Grosthead of the same faith and Religion with the Church of Rome?
A17976But we aske him a question which hee will neuer assoile vs, Why did Charles bring so many Bishoppes and Abbots to Rome?
A17976But who gaue him Iurisdiction ouer Princes?
A17976But will yee haue the truth?
A17976Caietan being moued with the sharpnesse of that speach, answered: What?
A17976Can you haue two kingdomes more opposite?
A17976Did these rule and gouerne S. Iohn, or S. Iohn them?
A17976For further declaration of the truth, let this question be demaunded: to whom is the word of God principally giuen?
A17976For if wee denie this pretended Iurisdiction, they will aunswere that it is grounded vpon the word of God: if we demaund, what word they haue for it?
A17976For is not this euil, to start from the Church, and obedience of the Sea Apostolicke?
A17976For, saith 〈 ◊ 〉[ Sigebert perceiuing that he could not proue this by former Historiographers, what did he?
A17976From this ground riseth this question of Pilate, Art thou the King of the Iewes?
A17976From whom then did Gratian transcribe it?
A17976He saith, that the name of Inuestitures was not knowen in that age, wherein Charles liued: But how doth he proue that?
A17976How can you keepe that Allegeance, seeing that you your selfe require homage& Allegeance of those that are Gods?
A17976How then commeth the Bishop of Rome to this practise of Iurisdiction, which now he claimeth?
A17976I appeale to the conscience of any Papist that either is, or would bee esteemed learned: whether these Epistles be not forged, in his iudgement?
A17976If any man demaund this question; why then, doe you admit some Apostolicall traditions?
A17976If any obiect against me: what then?
A17976If our aduersaries obiect against vs and our Church: why then doe you giue to the King the Title of supreame head or Gouernour of the Church?
A17976Is not the King of England our vassall, or to say more, our slaue?
A17976Must not these humane ordināces regard such things?
A17976No proofe is brought: and what neede he bring any proofe, seeing there are many that are readie, to take all that he saith without proofe?
A17976Nonne r ● … x Anglorum noster est vassallus?
A17976Now if this coactiue Iurisdiction may be executed by Lay- men: why not by Magistrates?
A17976Now that power which is custos disciplinae Ecclesiae, what is it, but Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction?
A17976Now that which in Saint Augustines time was vngodly, can it be made godly, and lawfull in Anselmes time?
A17976Or what is it, that Princes can haue a more tender feeling of, then of their Crownes, and of the hearts of their subiects?
A17976Quando audisti clemētissime imperator, in causasidei, Laicos de Episcopo iudicasse?
A17976Quis?
A17976Si nō ergo mouerentur, quomodo redderent rationē de Imperio suo, Deo?
A17976That are the sons of the most high?
A17976That is:[ Hee that now with- holdeth, shall with- hold till he be taken out of the way: Who is that?
A17976Then if the question be asked, to whom is the word giuen by the way of knowledge to preach and publish it?
A17976Then let them not demaund of vs such f ● … iuolous questions, where was our Church before M. Luther?
A17976Then these men that haue bound themselues by an Oath to the Pope; how is it possible they should performe true Allegeance to the King?
A17976Then this thing was graunted by Phoc ● … s, at the suit of Boniface; and what was granted?
A17976This is the authority of a Christian Prince, for he hath called them Gods to whom the word was giuen: Whom hath hee called Gods?
A17976This is true: and this is that which those testimonies speake of; but what is this to criminous Clarks?
A17976Was there euer any man before Baronius that put this imputation vpon Sigebert?
A17976What can be denied heere?
A17976What crueltie did they impute to her?
A17976What is this to the purpose?
A17976What needed they to haue forged a Canon, if they had so faire euidences to shew?
A17976What persecution to her Gouernement?
A17976What shall I say of the Allegeance by you promised and sworne to S. Peter and to vs?
A17976What then would he haue done, if thereunto had beene added the commaundement of his Prince against such Appellations?
A17976When I heare such as come to be Popes, refute it before they come to that place?
A17976Who are they who in the iudgment of this man, do peruert the words of Christ?
A17976Why are they called Gods?
A17976Why should these vncleane spoiles be found in the hands of godly Princes?
A17976Why then doth he beare the sword?
A17976Why then?
A17976[ Art thou the King of the Iewes?]
A17976[ What doe you tell me that I breake mine alleageance to the King, by appealing to the Sea Apostolique?
A17976and is not the word of God giuen to Ecclesiasticall gouernours aswell as to Kings?
A17976and what is the father of a familie by nature, but a little King?
A17976are these the censures of Christes Church?
A17976dost thou in this Councell, in the hearing of vs all, call the Pope an heretique?
A17976shall we say that they had Iurisdiction ouer S. Iohn, or S. Iohn ouer them?
A17976so religiously preached?
A17976to whose Soueraigne custodie is the word of God committed?
A17976two Kings more contrary?
A17976who is able at our becke to imprison him, and to appoint him to ignominie?
A17976who would not rather iudge that the Popes arrogancy, pride, vsurpation, oppression, corruption might by this be prooued?
A17976will you take vpon you to handle this thing, better then such a learned and prudent Prelate?
A36871''T is then a ridiculous Question, which they demand of the King, whether he will defend the reformed Religion with Souldiers of the Roman Religion?
A36871After all this, can any man wonder if they durst not trust the King?
A36871After this execrable murther of their excellent Soveraign, how many murthers did they heap upon this?
A36871And dare these people speak of Reformation and Conformity with the Reformed Churches?
A36871And did he enter into Treaty with his Irish Subjects, before he had a long time in vain sollicited his English to their duty?
A36871And if they had it not, why did they draw the sword without the lawful power, and against him to whom the power appertained by their own confession?
A36871And were they not sent and departed to councel and advise the King, and to succour their Counties?
A36871Are these the men who have so cried out against the murtherers, which massacred so many thousand Protestants?
A36871Are these they who before and after the Massacre, did so press the King to sign their utter extirpation?
A36871Are these those who rendred the King odious, only for offering them peace and pardon?
A36871Are you Prophets as Deborah and Jeremy, to curse with Authority?
A36871BUt do we not much wrong them to say that there is nothing makes for them in all the ancient Writings and Histories of this Kingdom?
A36871BUt was there ever any thing more unreasonable then this proceeding?
A36871Be not righteous over- much, neither make thy self over- wise, why shouldest thou destroy thy self?
A36871Blind Zealots, who stirred you up so disorderly to pull down Antichrist?
A36871But to what was the charity of many pious souls imployed?
A36871But what?
A36871But where is the man that is so simple as to be deceived by so sottish a force?
A36871Can not our sufferings which you remember so often to us, perswade you from following so dangerous a Councel?
A36871Can there be in the world a more pernicious superstition?
A36871Could they have furnished Money, Armes, Men and Shipping?
A36871Did they give them Commission to levy and make War against their King, to cut off his head?
A36871Did they not make amongst themselves a Monopoly of all the gainful Offices?
A36871Do they hope by these wicked waies to draw down a blessing of God upon their cause?
A36871Doth this Army draw their sword against the King?
A36871For where is the Criminal or Malefactor that dares commit himself to, or trust the Judge?
A36871For whose advantage and profit were those Imposts ● ● ● ied?
A36871Gentlemen, lay your hands upon your Consciences, Who are they which invented those Taxes by which you have so provoked my people against me?
A36871Ha people frantick?
A36871Had they the means to put out the Fire, when they had once kindled it?
A36871He hath often protested, and oft- times published, and in this difference taken all Christendome for Arbiters; but what?
A36871He himself would pay Tribute to Cesar, although of right he should have made Cesar Tributary to him?
A36871How do they reprove them that Baptize no more in the Name of the Father, the Son, and the holy Ghost?
A36871How have the Members of Parliament answered the intentions of those that sent them?
A36871How many Churches are there where there hath been no speaking of a Sacrament these fifteen or sixteen years?
A36871How many Patrons are there who sell their Benefices to them who will give most?
A36871How will they answer for them who were actually imployed in the massacre of the King, and who have since felt a hell in their consciences?
A36871If the father of the State stand in your way, now when ye are busie in this holy cause, must he be dispatched?
A36871In doing whereof, they did much wrong to their cause, for if they had the lawful power of the sword, why did they then so often demand it of the King?
A36871Is it because of their great resemblance one with another?
A36871Is it because they dare not receive the body and blood of our Lord, with hands defiled with rapine and innocent blood?
A36871Is it notpermitted to every one to Baptize or not Baptize their children?
A36871Is it to pay the Armies of his Holiness, that such great Summes of Money are raised of the Protestants?
A36871Is this the effect of so many solemn Professions, of so many Fasts and publick Humiliations for the establishment of the Gospel in Ireland?
A36871Is this the simplicity and meekness of the Gospel?
A36871Is this the way to guide Conscience into the way of peace, and to set up the Kingdom of Jesus Christ, or Christ on his Throne?
A36871Item, if it be disputed whether they can erre in this Controversie also, they would judge they could not erre?
A36871Must the Universal Christian Church be gulled by their scruples, composed of the folly of some, and the malice of others?
A36871Now I would fain know of these men, what this Person is that it is lawful to resist?
A36871Oh how will they palliate over this vile action?
A36871Oh supreme degree of perfidy, and frantick blindness?
A36871Or otherwise, Why shouldest thou draw desolation on thy self?
A36871Preach to the people that their War is lawful and holy?
A36871Should he rather willingly have lost two Kingdoms to help his enemies to render themselves Masters of the third?
A36871Should they be Infallible Judges of their Infallibility?
A36871The Question between the King and his Subjects, being not, Whether they may with confidence leave the Sword in the Kings hand?
A36871The Reformed Churches, say they, have no Bishops; but we demand of them, whether all those Churches which have Bishops are not Reformed?
A36871The Truth which they pretend to advance, must it be established and set up by lying?
A36871They made an Ordinance, That no Member of Parliament should exercise any Office in the State, but how well did they keep it?
A36871Upon which, an excellent Writer makes this gentle Question to them, How many were in their Armies, or how many they would have had?
A36871Use they any violence either against his Person or Estate?
A36871WE wonder exceedingly how our Enemies dare solicite the Reformed Churches to Covenant with them: From whence comes this great familiarity?
A36871Was he a Pagan?
A36871Was it their intentions that they should ● it in Parliament to perpetuity, and place in their children to perpetuate their Raign in their Families?
A36871Were my Revenues encreased by them?
A36871What care do many people take to Baptize their children?
A36871What cruelty is this, to undertake to bind the Spirit of Zeal?
A36871What?
A36871What?
A36871What?
A36871When their fellow Citizens chose them, did they chuse them to be their Soveraigns?
A36871Where are the Forreign Churches that require of them the abolition of the publike Service?
A36871Where is it that they have reserved the liberty to resume the Supreme Authority when they shall please?
A36871Where is the Articles of that Capitulation which in some certain cases dissolves the Subjects Oath of Allegiance?
A36871Where is their Conscience?
A36871Where is their Ingenuity?
A36871Where is their honesty?
A36871Where is their shame?
A36871Where is their sincerity?
A36871Where the word of the King is, there is power; and who may say unto him, what dost thou?
A36871Who beholds not in this an evident contradiction?
A36871Who he is to whom God hath committed the sword, and who hath power to give it to others, and to whom God hath subjected him?
A36871Why else should they ask it of him?
A36871Wilt thou then not be afraid of the Power?
A36871and Baptism is it not refused to many Infants, which are presented to be Baptized?
A36871and that they suck the poor Families even to the very Marrow?
A36871and where is the Cozener and Deceiver, who being discovered, dares trust him whom he hath cozened and deceived?
A36871being born Subjects, have they power to give the Soveraignty to their Deputies or Parliament men, and make them Chief?
A36871but to what purpose is this?
A36871but whether God hath committed the Sword to the King to be born by him?
A36871having rebellions then on all sides?
A36871is of very great weight: Who can stretch forth his hand against the Lords Anointed, and be guiltless?
A36871or an Usurper of a Kingdom, as Jabin?
A36871that is to say, can they give them that which they have not?
A36871these persons do they meddle to preach the Truth?
A36871when is it that their Souldiers were partakers of it, those zealous murtherers, whose assassinations and plunderings are steeped in piety?
A36871when was it that the heads of the Covenanters received it?
A36871who would not confide and trust in them that declare the Statutes of God, and take his Covenant in their mouth?
A36871● nd have not they done the contrary?
A42139?
A42139And is it against mans reason that he in following years may meet other bookes of Arians, Socinians,& c.& do the like?
A42139And what Jesus Christ are we obliged to believe in?
A42139And what Religion shall J profess, if J lay Scripture asyde?
A42139And what greater authoriti ● has a synod of England for to prov ● a Doctrin to be of the Reformation than a synod of France which I have produced?
A42139And what then?
A42139And why?
A42139And will you deny this to be the Doctrin of the Reformation, wheras its Scripture as interpreted by men of so eminent and sound a judgment?
A42139Articles of the Church of England, which allow no other Rule of faith but Scripture as each person of sound judgment vnderstands it?
A42139Articles?
A42139Ask them, if we be obliged to believe the Doctrin and sense of scripture delivered by a general Council?
A42139But can you prove this Doctrin by the testimony of any of our synods?
A42139But is there no Tenet of Religion which we are all indispensably obliged to hold?
A42139But what do you think of a Child Christen''d in Popery by a Monk or a Fryar, ought he to be Christen''d again in our Reformation?
A42139But what''s the matter?
A42139Can there be any synod in England of so great authoritie as our wise and prudent Parliaments?
A42139Can you prove that our Rule of faith is Scripture as any particular Dr or person of sound judgment vnderstands it?
A42139Destroy it?
A42139Did Luther and Calvin forsake the Pope and Councils, for to submit their judgments to any other?
A42139Did any teach that we may with a safe conscience change our Religion as you say?
A42139Did ever any Apostle speake with more courage?
A42139Do you think a Doctrin is not of the Reformation, because it s denied by the Church of England?
A42139Does he forsake the Reformation because he forsakes Lutheranism for Calvinism?
A42139Does not our Reformation teach that it''s possible to all men assisted with Gods Grace to keep the Commandments?
A42139Happily?
A42139Have not we many examples of his in our best& most renowned Reformers?
A42139How long halt ye between two opinions?
A42139Is''t possible?
A42139J ca n''t tell; what may be the reason, think you?
A42139J would gladly know, if it be lawfull to chop or change the text?
A42139Let vs ask this synod by what Rule of faith does the Reformation walk?
A42139Must I not believe that the Doctrin of Jesus Christ, delivered to his Apostles and the Church is true Doctrin?
A42139No sure; for Calvinism is as much of the Reformation as the other: Is not Protestancy as much the Doctrin of the Reformation as Presbyterie?
A42139Nor was it only Luther and Calvin spoke thus, but all our first blessed Reformers; and why?
A42139Or than Luther and Zuinglius our first Reformers inspired by God to teach vs the puritie of the Ghospel?
A42139Shock me?
A42139The Popes Supremacy is the Doctrin of Popery; who doubts it?
A42139Was it not from Luther and Zuinglius that England receiued the Doctrin of the Reformation?
A42139What do you think of Iustifying faith?
A42139What do you think, have not wee a Church on earth establisht by Christ, wherin wee are to live and serve him, and believe her Doctrin?
A42139What, not Paganism, which adored a Multitude of Gods, for Christianity which adores but one?
A42139Wherin can you say does this man transgress against the Doctrin or principles of the Reformation?
A42139Why?
A42139Will you believe Scripture, as it is interpreted, and in that sense which the Church, Councils, and Fathers propound vnto you?
A42139Would Luther have given this liberty, if Transubstantiation had not been the Doctrin of the Reformation as well as any other?
A42139You can never settle any but rhis, That every man may without le ● or hinderance believe what he please: and why should not this be a good Religion?
A42139],[ London?
A42139and if England be so bold as to say they erred in this, what assurance can we haue, but that they erred in the rest?
A42139and it shall be lawfull for them to believe it against the Doctrin of the whole Church?
A42139and must they be constrain''d to deny or believe because the fallible Church of England or France will have it so?
A42139and were not Doctor Morton, Fox, Field and Illiricus men of sound judgement, eminent Learning, and Godlines?
A42139and what difference betwixt you and the Church of Rome?
A42139and what if a Popish Priest or Fryar did becom of our Reformed Church, can he lawfully marry, wheras he made a vow of Chastity?
A42139and what then?
A42139and why should not it be lawfull to any Reformed to believe this, wheras its Scripture as interpreted by a man of so sound a judgment?
A42139are not Luther, Caluin, Danaeus, Ochinus as well of the Reformation; and men of as sound judgment as they?
A42139but England France and Scotland believes this Mysterie; well?
A42139by whom were they condemn''d?
A42139do not they persecute all non Conformists, as well as Popery?
A42139do you call an exchange of Paganism for Popery( introduced by Austin) a Happiness?
A42139does faith alone justify vs?
A42139have you met any thing in it, which shocks you?
A42139how can you say, J oblige you to believe fals and scandalous Tenets?
A42139if Popery( not withstanding it be Idolatrie, as they say) be a saving Religion; how can they deny but that Paganism is also a saving Religion?
A42139if- therefore this be Scripture as interpreted by them how can you deny it to be the Doctrin of the Reformation?
A42139is not Scripture our Rule of faith, and are wee to regard what any Church or all Churchs say, further than wee find by Scripture that they say well?
A42139me thinks you become pale som thing troubles you, speake, what i st?
A42139must J believe yours against my Conscience and knowledge ▪ or must not J believe my own?
A42139must our Rule of faith be Scripture as the Church of England vnderstands it, and not otherwise?
A42139of our Reformation, and our Travellers to the Court of Rome give this testimonie of them?
A42139or because she persecutes the Professors of it?
A42139or is it not the Doctrin of our Reformation?
A42139what do you inferr from this discourse?
A42139what is Calvinism, but what Calvin a particular Dr, judged to be the sense of Scripture against that same Church?
A42139what must a man believe for to be a true Reformed?
A42139what need had our Forefathers therefore to abandon Paganism?
A42139what need therefore of a Bible for to have Religion?
A42139what say you to the Presbyterians, who preferr their own sense and interpretation of the Bible, before that of the Church of England?
A42139why was it not left in the land?
A42139you can hardly shew me any Tenet of Popery, but what is its Doctrin; what Doctrin more Popish than that of Confession and Absolution from sins?
A42139you say they are old condemn''d Heretiks: and does this language becom a Child of the Reformed Church?
A63169And had he not his Priests habit on when he gave it you?
A63169And what did you tell her you could say?
A63169Are you a Papist?
A63169Are you a Papist?
A63169But now the main question will be, what it was she heard him say?
A63169By and by your defence will be proper, in the mean time, what will you ask her more?
A63169Can you say you ever saw or knew him?
A63169Come Friend, what can you say concerning Atkins the Prisoner being a Priest?
A63169Come Jarvis, what can you say?
A63169Come Mr. Brown, what can you say against the Prisoner?
A63169Come what can you say?
A63169Come what have you more to say?
A63169Did not you tell her that you heard the Prisoner say Mass?
A63169Did she ask where you saw Mr. Kerne?
A63169Did she tell you and instruct you what you should say against the Prisoner?
A63169Did she tell you what she could say?
A63169Did they all receive at the same time?
A63169Did you ever Confess to him?
A63169Did you ever hear him say Mass?
A63169Did you ever hear him say Mass?
A63169Did you ever hear him say Mass?
A63169Did you ever receive the Sacrament according to their way of Mr. Brommich before the time you speak of?
A63169Did you ever receive the Sacrament before, and of whom?
A63169Did you ever receive the Sacrament of him according to the manner of the Church of Rome?
A63169Did you ever receive the Sacrament of him, or hear him say Mass?
A63169Did you ever see Brommich give the Sacrament?
A63169Did you ever see him give a Wafer, Marry, or Christen?
A63169Did you ever see him say Mass?
A63169Did you ever see him since?
A63169Did you ever take up that woman to hear Mass?
A63169Did you not see Brommich there?
A63169Did you not tell Margaret Edwards that you heard him say Mass?
A63169Did you see him deliver the Wafers?
A63169Did you see him do any thing?
A63169Did you tell her what she shouly say?
A63169Did you tell her what you could say against him?
A63169Do any Bury or Christen but Priests?
A63169Do you believe this to be the man?
A63169Do you know Margaret Edwards?
A63169Do you know Mr. Kerne?
A63169Do you remember that about May was Twelvemonth this woman came to you for Physick for a woman that was sick?
A63169Do you remember this?
A63169Do you take it to be certain, or do you believe it only that it was that day?
A63169Gentlemen of the Jury are you agreed of your Verdict?
A63169Gentlemen of the Jury look on the Prisoner, What say you, Is he guilty of the High Treason whereof he stands indicted, or not guilty?
A63169Gentlemen of the Jury, have you agreed on your Verdict?
A63169Gentlemen, Are you Agreed of your Verdict?
A63169Had he a Surplice on?
A63169Had you any discourse with him there?
A63169Had you any discourse with him?
A63169Have you Witnesses Atkins, or any thing to say for your self?
A63169Have you any Witnesses?
A63169Have you any more Witnesses?
A63169How came you to give her the Sacrament?
A63169How came you to see him at Mrs. Monington''s?
A63169How long ago?
A63169How long have you known him?
A63169How long is''t ago since you saw him last?
A63169How long were you a Papist?
A63169How many were there in company?
A63169How neer were you to him?
A63169How often between the first time and the twenty ninth of May was Twelvemonth, did you see Mr. Kerne?
A63169How often?
A63169How often?
A63169How you answer?
A63169I askt Margaret Edwards if she had been at Mrs. Monington''s: she said she had; I askt her if she knew Mr. Kerne?
A63169In what language were his prayers?
A63169Is it lawful for any one but a Priest to say Mass?
A63169Is that all you have to say?
A63169J. Biddolph, do you know Mr. Kerne?
A63169J. Jarvis, why will you not be sworn?
A63169J. Mary Jones, when did you see Mr. Kerne?
A63169J. Mr. Hyet, you can not be sworn, but you must speak the truth as much as if you were: Well, what can you say?
A63169J. Mrs. Monington, do you know James Harris of Lempster?
A63169Look on the Prisoner, can you say that is the man?
A63169Look upon the Prisoner: What say you, Is Charles Kerne Guilty of the High Treason whereof he stands Indicted, or Not Guilty?
A63169Margaret Edwards, Did Mary Jones tell you that she heard Mr. Kerne say Mass?
A63169Mary Jones, was it a sickly Child?
A63169My Lord, I desire she may be askt whether she came to Mrs. Monington''s of her own accord, or was sent for Physick?
A63169N ● did not Robinson say he heard you say something in an unknown tongue, that he then saw you in a Surplice?
A63169Now, Mary Jones, what say you?
A63169P. Did the Man send you or his Wife?
A63169P. How could you know a voice?
A63169P. I would know if the man she saw at Mrs. Monington''s, was the same Person she saw at Lucton?
A63169P. Was there no Room between?
A63169P. Where did that Harris live?
A63169Robinson at the time she speaks of at Mr. Parsall''s?
A63169Robinson, are you a Papist?
A63169To how many?
A63169To how many?
A63169Was he in a Surplice then?
A63169Was he in a Surplice then?
A63169Was she upon her Oath when you askt her this?
A63169Well, what said Mrs. Monington to you?
A63169Were there any more in the Room besides him?
A63169Were they in Latin?
A63169Were you a Papist then?
A63169Were you a Servant there?
A63169What Lands, Goods, or Tenements had he?
A63169What Statute do you mean, that of 27 Eliz?
A63169What a question is that?
A63169What an argument is that?
A63169What can you say against the Prisoner?
A63169What can you say concerning Atkins being a Priest?
A63169What can you say for your self?
A63169What can you say more?
A63169What can you say to Mr. Brommich?
A63169What can you say?
A63169What company was there?
A63169What did he say?
A63169What did you say to her?
A63169What did you see him do?
A63169What did you see him do?
A63169What discourse had you with the other woman?
A63169What kind of Chappel was it?
A63169What say you for your self?
A63169What say you to this?
A63169What was the Chappel adorn''d with?
A63169What were the Cushions of?
A63169What, did she ask you what you could say against Mr. Kerne?
A63169What?
A63169When was the first time you saw Margaret Edwards?
A63169When you give such Bread, do you not say Accipe Corpus Christi?
A63169When?
A63169Where did you first see him?
A63169Where did you know him?
A63169Where, at Bollingham?
A63169Where?
A63169Where?
A63169Who Christned it?
A63169Who first seduc''d you?
A63169Who shall say for you?
A63169Who shall say for you?
A63169Who shall say it for you?
A63169Whose was it, the Prisoners?
A63169Why, do n''t you know him?
A63169Will you ask her any thing else?
A63169Woman, was it Harris or his Wife sent you?
A63169You Jeoffery Robinson, do not you know Mr. Brommich?
A63169You never absconded, what is that to giving the woman the Sacrament several times?
A63169You swear positively to four: Did they Confess to him?
A63169You wait on Mrs. Monington, did you ever see that woman?
A63169did we talk of any one but you?
A63169do you remember this?
A63169have you any more to say?
A63169know you by Face or by Name?
A59095''T is all one as if they should make the Standard for the Measure, we call a Chancellor''s Foot, what an uncertain Measure would this be?
A59095''T is not because I think I ought not to do them, nor because you think I ought not; if so, our minds might change, whence then comes the Restraint?
A59095A Priest has no such thing as an inindelible Character: what difference do you find betwixt him and another Man after Ordination?
A59095A hundred Men may owe me an Hundred Pounds, as well as any one Man, and shall they not pay me because they are stronger than I?
A59095Abraham paid Tythes to Melchizedeck, what then?
A59095And what will that be?
A59095And why must the Fryers be more perfect than the Pope himself?
A59095Attorney Noy being dead, some were saying, how would the King do for a fit Man?
A59095Besides who must be Judge?
A59095But if a Physician had the same Disease upon him that I have, and he should bid me do one thing, and he do quite another, could I believe him?
A59095But if they would come amongst them, how could they hinder them?
A59095But if this be Juggling, why do they punish Impostures?
A59095But it can not be otherwise; the Parish can not be divided into several Forms: What must the Preacher then do in Discretion?
A59095But when d''ye hear of Bishop a Traytor now?
A59095By what Law?
A59095Can they do as the Apostles could?
A59095Does it follow therefore the Bishops must have the same in England?
A59095Does that argue he has any spiritual Jurisdiction?
A59095For example, if you ask whether a Patron may present to a Living after six Months by Law?
A59095Have they any power to compel one to pay?
A59095He had Priests of several sorts sent unto him; as they came in, he ask''d them who they were; who are you to the first?
A59095His gift is to pray long, that I see; but does he pray better?
A59095How do you know those words signifie,[ In the beginning was the word,] but by Tradition, because some Body has told you so?
A59095How many things did the King resolve in his Declaration concerning Scotland, never to do, and yet did them all?
A59095How shall the Clergy be in the Parliament, if the Bishops are taken away?
A59095How should I know I ought not to steal, I ought not to commit Adultery, unless some body had told me so?
A59095I am a Priest of the Church of Rome; you are welcome quoth the Keeper, there are those will take Care of you, and who are you?
A59095I and my Wife and Children must starve, If I part with my Land; must I not therefore let them have my Land, that have bought it and paid for it?
A59095I wear those Gloves; but perhaps if an Alderman should command me, I should think much to do it: What has he to do with me?
A59095IF our Fathers have lost their Liberty, why may not we labour to regain it?
A59095If he does, what a fine thing hath he done?
A59095If the Civil Power might take away all but three Things, why may they not take them away too?
A59095If the Parliament and Presbyterian Party should dispute, who should be Judge?
A59095If the Pope gives me a Jewel, will you therefore take it away from me?
A59095If there be no Bishops, there must be something else, which has the Power of Bishops, though it be in many, and then had you not as good keep them?
A59095If they be not to be us''d, why did God make them?
A59095If two of us make a Bargain, why should either of us stand to it?
A59095If we must admit nothing but what we read in the Bible, what will become of the Parliament?
A59095If we once come to leave that outloose, as to pretend Conscience against Law, who knows what inconvenience may follow?
A59095If you ask whether the King may?
A59095If you will have no half Crowns, but only single Pence, yet Thirty single Pence are half a Crown; and then had you not as good keep both?
A59095Is it matter of Faith how the Church should be govern''d?
A59095Is there not enough to meddle with upon the Stage, or in Love, or at the Table, but Religion?
A59095KIng James said to the Fly, Have I Three Kingdoms, and thou must needs fly into my Eye?
A59095Must they take upon them as the Apostles did?
A59095Must we be govern''d like Ephesus and Creet?
A59095Now the Question will be, whether these Canons for Blood were in use in this Kingdom or no?
A59095One of the Church of Rome will not come to our Prayers, does that agree he doth not like them?
A59095Or what if the Pope gave the Tythes to any Man, must they therefore be taken away?
A59095Put Case I bow to the Altar, why am I guilty of Idolatry?
A59095SUppose a Man find by his own Inclination he has no mind to marry, may he not then vow Chastity?
A59095So how many know what are the Priviledges of the Parliament, and the Liberty of the Subject, when they take the protestation?
A59095Suppose a Christian came into a Pagan Country, how can you fancy he shall have any Power there?
A59095Suppose a Planet were a Simple, or an Herb, how could a Physician tell the Vertue of that Simple, unless he could come at it, to apply it?
A59095Surely''t is because I have been told so?
A59095THE Fryers say they possess nothing, whose then are the Lands they hold?
A59095THE Hall was the Place where the great Lord us''d to eat,( wherefore else were the Halls made so big?)
A59095That is, why not in some shape we paint him in, with Claws and Horns?
A59095The Answer to all these Doubts is, Have you agreed so?
A59095The Apostles had a Mark to be known by, spake Tongues, cur''d Diseases, trod upon Serpents,& c. Can they do this?
A59095The Bishops being put out of the House, whom will they lay the Fault upon now?
A59095The Customer or the Writer?
A59095The Fathers, Church Story, Schoolmen, all may pass for Popish Books, and if you take away them, what Learning will you leave?
A59095The House of Commons is called the Lower House, in twenty Acts of Parliament, but what are twenty Acts of Parliament amongst Friends?
A59095The Knights and Burgesses sit for themselves and others, some for more, some for fewer, and what is the Reason?
A59095The Lord seeing that, Sirrah, says he, Do you not know me that you use no Reverence?
A59095Then again, whether will a Man be sooner content, himself should be made a Slave, or his Son after him?
A59095There is no Oath scarcely, but we swear to things we are ignorant of: For Example, the Oath of Supremacy; how many know how the King is King?
A59095They do nothing but what may be done by Art, they make the Devil fly out of the Window, in the Likeness of a Bat or a Rat, why do they not hold him?
A59095WHY have we none possest with Devils in England?
A59095WHY should I think all the fourth Commandment belongs to me, when all the fifth does not?
A59095WHat makes a City?
A59095We commonly are at[ What''s the Reason of it?]
A59095What Land will the Lord give me for honouring my Father?
A59095What Law is there to take up Arms against the Prince, in Case he break his Covenant?
A59095What can I say to this Man?
A59095What have Meals and Sermons to do one with another?
A59095What if Timothy had power in Ephesus, and Titus in Creet over the Presbyters?
A59095What is that to any Temporal Lord''s Estate, how Lands were first divided, or how in William the Conquerours Days?
A59095What is that to the purpose, to what End were Bishops Lands given to them at first?
A59095What matter is it then what they Preach or Teach in the Schools?
A59095What must be done then?
A59095What need you care what you say, or what need I care what I say?
A59095When the Dog is beat out of the Room, where will they lay the Stink?
A59095When the Lord''s Supper was instituted, there were none present but the Disciples, shall none then but Ministers receive?
A59095Where was America an Hundred or Sixscore Years ago?
A59095Where was your Religion before Luther, an Hundred years ago?
A59095Whether Infants should be baptized?
A59095Whether a Bishoprick or any of that Nature?
A59095Whether do Humane Laws bind the Conscience?
A59095Whether had the inferior Clergy ever any thing to do in the Parliament?
A59095Whether is every Baron a Baron of some Place?
A59095Whether is the Church or the Scripture Judge of Religion?
A59095Whether may Bishops be present in Cases of Blood?
A59095Whether may Subjects take up Arms against their Prince?
A59095Whether we have any Property in our Goods?
A59095Why are the Venetians Roman Catholicks?
A59095Why did the Heathens object to the Christians, that they worship an Asses Head?
A59095Why does the Nurse tell the Child of raw Head and bloody Bones, to keep it in awe?
A59095Why in the Likeness of a Bat, or a Rat, or some Creature?
A59095Why is not he as honest a Man as he that pretends a Ceremony establish''d by Law, is against his Conscience?
A59095Why should we leave it out?
A59095Why should you have a Synod, when you have a Convocation already, which is a Synod?
A59095Why, then beyond Seas where a Nun is possest, when a Hugonot comes into the Church, does not the Devil hunt them out?
A59095Why?
A59095Within that time I went to Dinner to his House, and ask''d him how he did?
A59095Would it not look odly to a Stranger, that should come into this Land, and hear in our Pulpits Usury preach''d against, and yet the Law allow it?
A59095Would they forbid Blood, and yet enjoin the eating of Blood too?
A59095Would you have a superfetation of another Synod?
A59095You are welcome too, I shall fare the better for you: And who are you?
A59095You will say the Scripture was written by the Holy Spirit, but do you understand that Language''t was writ in?
A59095by what Power?
A59095he finds faults with the Gods of the Country; well, they will put him to Death for it: when he is a Martyr, what follows?
A59095how I know this Carpet to be green?
A59095no you must dance after Dinner, and then to Bed Mother?
A59095not their Superiour''s, he hath vow''d Poverty as well as they, whose then?
A59095what are his Right and Prerogative?
A5373314 But would not his Obedience hallow, or at least excuse his action?
A537339. Who ever doubted of it?
A53733And hath this Gentleman really considered what the meaning of that word Trade is, and what is the concernment of this Nation in it?
A53733And how doth thi ● follow?
A53733And may not this Rule be quickly extended unto Oaths themselves, the bonds and Ligaments of humane Society?
A53733And shall they they be destroyed, if they miss it in some matters of smaller concernment?
A53733And what if others believe that to pursue their successes in Villany and Rebellion is to follow Providence?
A53733And what is it, that we treat about?
A53733And what now if those intended do not believe these things, nor any one of them?
A53733And what quietness, what peace is there like to be in the world, whilst the sword of vengeance must be continually drawn about these things?
A53733And why all this fierceness and severity?
A53733And why may not the same Rule and Order be observed with respect to the circumstances that attend the performance of the duties of instituted Worship?
A53733And will it not be bitterness in the latter end?
A53733And will they justifie all their oppressors?
A53733And would not the Authority of the King warrant his Obedience?
A53733And would these men be willingly thus dealt withall, by those who judge, or may judge them to err?
A53733Are immoralities or vicious debaucheries rather to be tolerated, or exempted from punishment, than such a dissent?
A53733Are there then Reasons: for their observation besides their Injuction, and such as on the account whereof they are injoyned?
A53733Are these their Apprehensions concerning God, sin, themselves and others?
A53733Are these things suited to the principles, Doctrines, practices of the Church of England?
A53733Are these things then so indeed?
A53733Besides who shall judge what is small, or what is great in things of this Nature?
A53733But is it not strange, how any man can assume to himself, and swallow so much confidence as is needful to the mannagement of this charge?
A53733But is their Judgement infallible?
A53733But shall this wrath never be allayed?
A53733But to what purpose is it to contend about these things?
A53733But what if it so fall out?
A53733But what if this also should prove a false and futilous pretence?
A53733But what name shall these new Vertues be called by?
A53733But what then is to be done in this Case?
A53733But what would be the issue of such proceedings?
A53733But who judgeth them to be so guilty of errors?
A53733But why so?
A53733But, as I said, what will be the end of these things, namely of mutual virulent reflections upon one another?
A53733Doth God deal thus in this world, in his Rule over the souls of men?
A53733Doth it thence follow that such persons must needs Rebell and be Seditious and disturb the publick peace, of the Society whereof they are Members?
A53733Doth the Lord Christ require his Disciples to do and observe in the Worship of God what ever he commanded them?
A53733Ecquid meministi?
A53733For to what purpose serve their Understandings, their Judgements, their Wills, if not to guide and determine them in their Actions?
A53733For what security can be had of him, who hath inured himself unto a continual contradiction between his Faith and his practice?
A53733For wherein can this be effected?
A53733Hath he dominion over them to rule them in the things of the Worship of God?
A53733Hath the Magistrate this his Authority in and over Religion and the consciences of men from Jesus Christ?
A53733He asks farther, what doth the Scripture mean when it stiles our Saviour the King of Kings, and maketh Princes his Vicegerents here on earth?
A53733How are they directed to behave themselves, after they have assumed a likeness unto the Most High, and exalted themselves to his Throne?
A53733How if they should be mistaken themselves in their judgement?
A53733I would then a little farther enquire, who shall judge whether the things commanded in Religion and the Worship of God be Idolatrous or Superstitious?
A53733Is it not because of the Authority of God over their minds and Consciences in these things?
A53733Is it not evident to him that hath but half an eye that we are come about again where we were before?
A53733Is it only towards them, who are of the same mind with themselves?
A53733Is it such as to make that to be Vertue which was not Vertue before, or which was Vice, and oblige men in Conscience to practise it as Vertue?
A53733Is it to be so born as to practise and observe the things so enjoyned though Superstitious and Idolatrous?
A53733Is it to judge of their Actions as done, whether they be good or evil?
A53733Is the Authority of Christ the formal Reason making Obedience necessary to his Commands and Precepts?
A53733Is the Lord Christ the Lord of the Souls and Consciences of men?
A53733Is this Spirit from above?
A53733Is this the Spirit wherewith the Children of the Church are acted?
A53733Is this the way to restore peace, quietness and satisfaction to the minds of men?
A53733Is this to act like God, whose power and authority they have assumed, or like to his greatest Adversary?
A53733Is this, thought I, the Spirit of the men with whom the Non- Conformists do contend, and upon whose Instance alone they suffer?
A53733Might Christ in his own Person administer the Holy Things of the Church of God?
A53733Now who shall fix bounds to what they will judge to fall under one or other of these limitations?
A53733Once more; what name of sin or wickedness will they find to affix to these errors?
A53733Or must Ephraim now answer for the sin, and not be only that imposed the command?
A53733Quanta isthaec Hominum summa est?
A53733Quis nist Callimachus?
A53733Quis tulerit Gracehos de seditione querentes?
A53733Shall this Sword devour for ever?
A53733Some have denyed him any concern herein; our Author is none of them?
A53733Suppose they be prevailed with, to run the hazzard and adventure of such an undertaking; what is it that they are thereon perswaded unto?
A53733What Ladders have men to climb personally into Heaven?
A53733What are the Affairs of Religion here intended, all or some?
A53733What are the concerns of publick good therein?
A53733What can be more directly forbidden, than the making or use ● ● g of graven Images, in or about Religious Worship?
A53733What hurt would it be to leave them so?
A53733What if some of them, are ridiculously framed into Articles of faith, from the supposed practices of some individual Persons?
A53733What if the things condemned as fulsome Metaphors prove to be Scriptural expressions of Gospel Mysteries?
A53733What if they do openly disavow every one of them, as for ought I ever heard or know they do, and as I do my self?
A53733What is it, that a little Truce and Peace is desired unto, and pleaded for?
A53733What place of Scripture in the Old or New Testament, which of the ancient Fathers of the Church, do speak at this rate?
A53733What thinks he of the Confessions of Ezra, of Daniel and others in the name of the whole people of God?
A53733Wherefore then are these weak attempts made to confirm and prove what is not?
A53733Whether they cross directly the Interest of the Gospel?
A53733Who is it that promiseth these things?
A53733Who would be gainers by it?
A53733Whom will such men fulfill the commands of patience, forbearance, waiting, meekness, condescension, that the Gospel abounds with, towards?
A53733Will this way of proceeding compose and satisfie the minds of men?
A53733and how if sundry things so odiously here expressed, be proved to have been sober Truths declared in words of Wisdom and Sobriety?
A53733and who shall attend them in their attempt?
A53733he answers, It is to be born: True, but how?
A53733how if he be not able to prove any of them by any considerable avowed instance?
A53733how will he confirm and vindicate it?
A53733no more then Christ hath his Authority from the Magistrate; for he holds it by the Law of Nature antecedent to the promise and coming of Christ?
A53733or did any one ever think, that they had a difficult case of Conscience to resolve in that matter?
A53733or is not this that, which is set out in the Fable of Phaeton, that he, who takes the Chariot of the Sun, will cast the whole world into a combustion?
A53733that there is no work at all of God upon the hearts of Sinners, but that which is purely moral, and perswasive by the word?
A53733that what is asserted by some concerning the Efficacy of the Grace of the Spirit, and concerning his gifts, is no more but a buzz and a noise?
A53733where lyes the difficulty?
A53733why?
A56215& c. is it not to Kings?
A56215& morte utraque terret mundum?
A562151. to 12?
A562158. but forbear and let them alone till God himself destroy them?
A56215An praeter Evangelium vos loqui arbitremini, si dixeritis qui fuste usus fuerit, fuste morietur?
A56215And yet as Luther, saith of the Clergy: Quando non invocat brachium seculare?
A56215Aug. respondit, Cur ergo non tali voce compescetis arma Circumcellionum?
A56215Behold now ye have heard his BLASPHEMIE, What think ye?
A56215But how chanceth it that the Lord of a ● Lords, and King of all Kings is no more feared?
A56215But the other answering, rebuked him, saying, Dost not thou feare God, seeing thou art in the same condemnation?
A56215But whom shall not these hurt nor destroy in all Gods holy Mountaine?
A56215Cur ergo non ab omnibus pax amatur?
A56215Cur igitur non cum maxima celeritate ejusmodi pravitatis, ut ita dicam, radices animadversione& poena publica amputamus?
A56215Dell reconcile or answer this expresse text to the contrary, in the same Evangelist?
A56215Did Master Dell, or his Saints in the Army, never spu ● re nor whip their free Horses?
A56215Did you ever hear me say, or hint, that the Magistrate should not punish outward wickednesse?
A56215Doe not the willingest Christians, Saints, need Rods, Spurs sometimes, as well as others, to quicken them?
A56215Epistle; where thus he writes: To whom is it said, Serve the Lord with feare?
A56215Et tamen tunc ei molestissimus& avertissimus videretur, quando utilissimus et misericordissimus extit isset?
A56215Hath he smitten them, as he smote those that smote them?
A56215How comes it to passe that his most holy, and blessed name is so universally blaspheamed, yea and that freely and without punishment?
A56215I dare averre it a most grosse slander,& desire him to define, who& where those SAINTS are, and what their names?
A56215I have a Baptisme to be baptized with, and how am I pained till it be fulfilled?
A56215If yee endure chasticeing: God dealeth with you as with Sonnes, for what Sonne is he whom the Father chastneth not?
A56215Illi autem sub ● am multis, sub tam severis legibus,& sub tanta Ecclesiae Catholicae, quam Dominus ei tribuit potestate, quid tale patiuntur?
A56215Is it not misery enough for men to refuse the good things of Heaven, except they also deprive them of the good things of this present life?
A56215Is not this, my Brethren, strange New- light from such a Comet as he is?
A56215Is this the Reformation that these New- lights intend?
A56215Moses stood in the Camp and said, who is on the Lords side?
A56215Nam qua precor alia ratione Christiano gregi contra lupos istos succurrere poteris?
A56215Nam quid jam si sapiatis potest esse probabilius?
A56215Nonne etiam cumuni indulgeat indigno ad prolapsionis contagium provocat universos?
A56215Now what became of him?
A56215Now who are meant by these hurtfull creatures?
A56215Num censuris Ecclesiae?
A56215Nunquid contemnere, nunquid desistere vel debel, vel potest?
A56215Nunquid ergo subito crudelis effectus est, cum de monte descendens tot milia juberet occidi?
A56215Petilianus dixit, Nunquid igitur caedem vel scismaticis Deus jussit inferri?
A56215Put as neminem debere cogi ad justitiam, cum logas Patrem familias dixisse servis, Quoscunque cogite intrare?
A56215Quid autem mansuetius sit quàm ut coërcitione damnorum tanta vestra scelera mulctarentur?
A56215Quid ergo?
A56215Quid ● ● ura?
A56215Quidigitur hîc faciat Ecclesiae medicina salutem omnium materna charitate conquirens, tanquam inter Phreneticos& Lethargicos aestuans?
A56215Quis cōmemorare sufficiat bello Firmiano quae à vobis Rogatus Maurus pertulerit?
A56215Quis est qui nescit, quod pastori charior esse debet suarum ovium salus, quàm Luporum vita?
A56215Quis vostrum in plebibus vestris non aliquid tale vel a prioribus comperit, vel ipse expertus est?
A56215Sea per literas haereses disseminare suas poterunt: An carceribus?
A56215Sed has ipsi contemnunt penitus: An amissionis rerum suarum metu?
A56215Sed isti nec Deum, nec homines metuunt: An exilio?
A56215That when the Souldiers came to Iohn the Baptist, and demanded of him, what shall wee doe?
A56215Then Ioash said unto all that stood against him, Wil ye plead for Baal?
A56215Tota igitur quaestio est, utrum vos non male agatis, quibus tanti Schismatis sacrilegium objecit orbis terrarum?
A56215What alterations then did this Statute make of the Law in former times used in this case?
A56215What then can be the Argument from this example?
A56215What then must be done?
A56215What then must be the naturall inference hence, but this?
A56215What then?
A56215Wil ye save him?
A56215Will it thence follow?
A56215Will you argue thus?
A56215and shall wee deem the most wise and just God guilty of such a Solecism?
A56215and who are they whom they shall not hurt nor destroy, and in what manner?
A56215d An liceat Magistratui occidere Pseudoprophetas?
A56215d Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?
A56215fortassis eam difficile soluturus es ▪ quo modo enim attrahit, si demittit ut quis quod voluerit eligat?
A56215is this their zeale, their piety, their sanctity?
A56215or doe Schoolmasters never whip or ferrula their Schollars that are most forwards to learne, because they are willing Boyes?
A56215or ever so called reputed in Scripture phrase?
A56215quando audiunt dici Christiano, dic te non esse Christianum?
A56215respondit; Si tibi proponam quaestionem, quomodo Deus Pater attrabat ad Filium homines, quos in libero dimisit arbitrio?
A56215shall tribulation, or distresse or PERSECVTION, or famine, or nakednesse, or perill, or Sword?
A56215the Liberty of Conscience they preach for, write for, fight for?
A56215was he let alone?
A56215was he permitted to go on in his schisme and seducement?
A56215when* doth it not call upon the secular power, and terrefies the world with both deaths?
A56215yea why do they all generally betake themselves to the Warres, to kill, hurt, and destroy in all the holy Mountaine?
A885871. Who would have thought that Iohn Price had studyed Pope Greg ● ● y?
A885872. Who are the most competent judges, the Parliament or the Army, to judge of this necessity?
A88587323. whereas Gregory hath but 56?
A88587And have not the Ministers cause to be against them in regard they go against those ends, for which they were first raised?
A88587And is not the same designe practised upon his faithfull Parliament and Subjects here in England?
A88587Because the false Prophets said they were Prophets of the Lord,& c. would you inserte hence, the Subscribers are not Ministers of the Gospel?
A88587Because you ask, why were the Ministers so angry, that the late King what brought to condignpunishm ● nt?
A88587But did they ever stirre up any to bring the King to a judiciall Tryal, and to take away his life?
A88587But what became of these men that slew Iehoash?
A88587Did not your heart give your hand the lye when you wrote these words?
A88587Do you deale candidly with so Orthodox a Divine as Beza was, to receive the slanderous reports of Papists against so zealous a Protestant?
A88587Generall accusations are no certain proofes: si sufciat accusare, qui ● erit innocent?
A88587Have you neit ● er for hope or fear, nor other respect relinquisht this Protestation?
A88587Here Mr. Love doth accuse Court- preachers,& Parasities of flattery bu ● is there the least word here of accusing the King of blood- guiltinesse?
A88587I must answer you, they exprest no anger, but a holy indignation against so horrid a fact, and had they not reason?
A88587If Kings may be dealt withall in a judiciary way, why are they so angry that the late King was brought to condigne punishment?
A88587If he had not authority from the young King for doing what he did, would he have done it?
A88587If the Ministers will not with you cry up a faction, must they therefore needs be charged by you to cry down a Parliament?
A88587Is here the least charge against the King?
A88587Is it not enough for you to walke in the Counsell of the ungodly, and stand in the way of sinners, but will you sit in the seat of the scornfull also?
A88587Is there any clause to this purpose in the words you quote?
A88587It seemes you do so, why else do you urge these instances out of Doctour Ponnet to justifie your King- killing Doctrine?
A88587It would search to the quick to know whether Rochell and all the Protestants in it were not betrayed into the hands of their enemies; and by whom?
A88587Jezabel could ask, had Zimri peace that slew his master?
A88587Loves Sermon tending to this, that the King was the Troubler of England, as Achan was of Israell?
A88587May not you now well be ashamed for charging that on others, which only you, and others of your faction are guilty of?
A88587Now can you prove the King to be guilty of such things as these?
A88587Now is it for your credit to gather such broken scraps, and tortured collections from so infamous an Author?
A88587Paul said he was an Apostle ● false Teachers said they were Apostles, when they were not, was 〈 ◊ 〉 therefore no Apostle?
A88587Suppose the Ministers had not declared against that act of the Apprentices, yet doth that any way extenuate that act of the Army?
A88587That he that cries out against all ordained Ministers, as having the mark of the Beast, should study the language of the beast?
A88587The Letter writers are( as they say) Ministers of the Gospel, and doe not you say so too?
A88587This was in the time of Popery; are Popish practices good patterns for Protestants to walk by?
A88587Those very men, and that matter almost in terminis is quoted by that Popish writer; and may not this give some ground to beleeve what I assert?
A88587To close this, I would aske you, Are you of Dr. Ponnets mind that any private man may kill a Tyrant?
A88587Was the Kings person, and Religions preservation so inconsistent, that there was no way to preserve the one, but by destroying the other?
A88587What lasting settlement can be expected from th ● ● ● men who at one time desire one thing, and at another time the quite contrary?
A88587What poor cavills are these?
A88587What will this advantage you?
A88587Whereas you say, the Ministers cry out against staining the Protestant Religion with the blood of the King; had they not cause to do so?
A88587Whether he that beats an Ensign with his own Colours, or they that offer violence to a Parliament, with their own swords?
A88587Whether he that takes away the Colours from an Ensign, or they that take away the fundamentall laws from a Kingdom?
A88587Whether was every man in Israel, even to the last man, bound to kill Saul a bloody King?
A88587You did once count it a vertue in the Ministers to excite the people against the King and His party, and doe you now esteem it a vice?
A88587and doth Mr. Love in this accuse the King of blood- guiltinesse?
A88587and is not one member divided from another?
A88587are they any other then Ministers of the Gospel, Preachers of the Word, Embassadors of Christ?
A88587are you turned malignant after so many turnings?
A88587but what you are?
A88587can not a man speak of King Iames or Prince Henries death, but must it bee interpreted that he said King CHARLES had a hand in it?
A88587can you despence with blood and none else?
A88587could no person bee found but the King alone to expiate the guilt of blood?
A88587dare you say the contrary?
A88587did any of them arrogate the Title of Universall Bishop, or any other name of vanity of the like nature?
A88587do you thinke that Moses his practise in killing the Aegyptian, and Ehud slaying Eglon, is to be imitated by every private man?
A88587doth your Religion teach you to punish the King and spare the Subjects?
A88587have wee not cause to judg better of many of the Prelaticall party?
A88587if guilty of blood, why were they spared?
A88587if so( according to your Principles) did not true Religion command you to put them to death as well as the King?
A88587if these be Catholicks, who be Caniballs?
A88587if these be the names of vanity, do not you count Christ vain in giving these names unto his Ministers?
A88587if you answer affirmatively, I am su ● e you answer falsly, for David said, who can stretch forth his hand against him and bee guiltlesse?
A88587if you say the Parliament, they saw no such necessity, why did not the army then acquiesce in their judgments as they once promised to do?
A88587it would go to the quick to find out whether the Irish Rebellion was not plotted, promoted and contrived in England, and by whom?
A88587pervert the true, naturall and genuine meaning of it, but how, or wherein, or against whom can you evidence this?
A88587such as hinder the Reformation of Religion, divide the King from his people( and have not you done that?)
A88587the Generall, and his Councell of War) a meeting?
A88587were there no veins to be opened to let out malignant blood from any part of the body, but must you cut off the head?
A88587what contemptuous and contumelious calumnies are these which you cast on the grave, godly, and learned Ministers of London?
A88587what tyrannicall Usurpers are you?
A88587what violence to any have they ever offered?
A88587what wrong have the Ministers done?
A88587when they in your esteem are guilty of blood as wel as He?
A4781343. in the Names of Themselves and Others, to call for the Execution of Iustice, on All delinquents?
A47813An Order, that you and your Confederates most Undu ● ifully destroy''d?
A47813And Attaque the King himself in the Head of his Troops?
A47813And are These the Saints( Gentlemen) that you are afraid should be cast out, for Schismatiques?
A47813And for the Discipline of Christ, tho all parts of the world have much opposed it, yet where hath it been so fiercely and powerfully resisted?
A47813And may not the Two Houses be Resisted by the Law of Nature as well as they oppo ● ● ● the King?
A47813And that you may not value your selves upon the Merits of your sufferings; Pray''e what was it that you suffer''d for?
A47813And the Preaching of the old Doctrine to the people over again, What Is it but the Preface to another War?
A47813And to produce his own Act and Deed in evidence against his Profession?
A47813And what did his Majesty now get by the Complement?
A47813And what good I beseech ye did you do them by it, but mislead, and confirm them in Principles of Disobedience?
A47813And what is it that yo ● charge upon your self here, more then that you were a little too Mealy- mouth''d?
A47813And why[ The Divines CALLED Presbyterians] and not rather the Presbyterian Divines?
A47813And without changing the Species of the Government?
A47813Are These Fit Agents for Unity and Peace?
A47813Are not these the Propositions think ye, of Most Humble and Faithful Subjects?
A47813At the Rate of Computation, why shall not a Ceremony at this day, out- weigh the Life of the Son, as Formerly it did That of the Father?
A47813But are you convinc''d of the Vnlawfulnesse?
A47813But how came they off I beseech you, from That froward Humour?
A47813But how is That the Peoples Representative, that Shuts the people out of the Election, and acts both Without, and Against their Consent?
A47813But if they were so well dispos''d to come In, what was it I beseech you that put them off again?
A47813But what becomes of us next?
A47813But what do ye mean, I beseech ye, by the Cry of the Plotters against ye?
A47813But what do ye think now( Gentlemen) of the Operation, or further Extent of such a Power?
A47813But what if the People shall Miss- Judge?
A47813But what is a Pr ● ● byterian?
A47813But what is it at last that you would be at?
A47813But what is it that you mean by this Known Integrity?
A47813But what say ye all this while to the Case of making Co ● nt to an Usurper?
A47813But what say you to Sacramental Leagues against Order, and Law?
A47813But what was it you were saying e''en now of the Best Governours in the World?
A47813But what way would you direct for the Limiting of the Qualifications?
A47813But what yet if they Were two thousand?
A47813But what''s your end in all This?
A47813But wher''s your Vindication of the Ch ● r ● ●-Orders you mention?
A47813But who must expound it?
A47813But why can ye not now dispense with your Covenants, as well as you did formerly with the Oath of Allegeance?
A47813But why do I argue from your Practises, when your Positions do naturally leade to the same undutyfull Ends?
A47813But why do I call it an Oath of Allegiance to Presbytery?
A47813Di ● not you animate the Party that was in Arms against the King; 〈 ◊ 〉 much as any man, and was That no hurt to his Person?
A47813Did not the Kirk lead the Dance, and the Republican Faction in England pay them their wages, and call them their Dear Brethren for their pains?
A47813Did ye not Covenant[ to preserve and defend the Kings Majestys Person, and Authority?]
A47813Do not the Kings of all these Nations stand up in the Room of their Progenitors; with the same Implacable Enmity to the Power of the Gospel?
A47813Do not you here acknowledge Richard the Pr ● tectors Sovereignty?
A47813Do not you know, that write about the Cause, that the War was not founded in Theologicall differences, but in Law differences?
A47813Do not you remember a certain Dedicatory Epistle, to Richard Protector, i ● your Key for Catholiques, where you have these words?
A47813Even 〈 ◊ 〉 to Mr. Baxters own Exposition, which is, that by St. 〈 ◊ 〉 Higher Powers, is Intended Those in Actual Poss ● ssion?
A47813For the Assembly- Divines to 〈 ◊ 〉 the People to rise for their Defence?
A47813Hath it not been by the Bloud of Saints?
A47813How comes Toleration to be a Sin, under 〈 ◊ 〉 Presbyterians, and a Duty under the Bishops?
A47813How comes it 〈 ◊ 〉 be Damnation, in the case of the Late King, and Richard 〈 ◊ 〉 well, to Obey the Former, and destroy the Latter?
A47813How could you ● ustify then a Submission to such a Prelacy?
A47813How few will take well a Reproof, but rather defend their sin?
A47813How have they earn''d their Titles?
A47813How 〈 ◊ 〉 Bishops to be Antichristian, at one time, and Warrantable at 〈 ◊ 〉?
A47813If Richard thinks fit to come In, there''s no body hinders him; and if Iohn will not come in, who can help it?
A47813If it had been as he woud have it; how comes the whole Order of Bishops to be Assaulted?
A47813If the Government was i ● King, Lords, and Commons, how came the Two Houses ● o Rule Alone, with an Vsurpation?
A47813In good time Mr. Richard: And who taught ye, I wonder your Complements to Prince Richard in the Five disputations?
A47813Is Faith and Holynesse propagated by Perswasion, and not by Force?
A47813Is This the Repentance, Mr. Baxter, of a Confessor?
A47813Is it such a Horrid Accusation, to say that Mr Baxter M ● i ● tains the King, may be call''d to Account by a Single Peer?
A47813Is not This Destructive of the Kings Power?
A47813Is this the meaning of all the Precepts of Honouring, and Obeying your Superiours?
A47813Now if the Constitution was so Abominable, why should they submit to it ▪ And if it was not so, why does Mr. Baxter say that it was?
A47813Or a Common Prayer- Book more Intolerable 〈 ◊ 〉 a Directory?
A47813Or by what Law did That Parliament raise That Army?
A47813Or how came you to Alienate your self from his Majesties Iurisdictino, and to turh Subject, to the Two Houses?
A47813Out of all doubt; but what if They expound the Scripture One way, and You Another?
A47813Pray''e Say: 〈 ◊ 〉 not the Freedome and Right of the Electors, as much a Fundamental, as the Priviledge, and Trust of the Elected?
A47813Pray''e tell me Mr. Richard; Was Prelacy Lawfull Before the Act for Uniformity, and not After?
A47813Pray''e where was the Fear of Cod, when the King was opposed?
A47813The Standard of the Presbyte ● ian Loyalty why not as tender of a breach of Trust, according to Law, as against it?
A47813Their Persons Affronted; and their Votes in Parliament taken away; without distinction?
A47813These are my own words, and do you think that I would ever have bestowed upon a detestable wretch, the Epithetes of PRUDENT, PIOUS and FAITHFUL?
A47813This is to Intimate that the P ● ● sbyterians were under a Persecution, Who were the Persecutors, I beseech ye?
A47813To the Robbing of Altars; demolishing of Temples; dethroning of Kings; degrading of Bishops?
A47813To the forcing of a whole Nation either to Swear or starve?
A47813Was it Nothing?
A47813Was the Feud so deadly, as to make them destroy Themselves; and Ruine the whole Hierarchy in Revenge?
A47813Was there such a Ministry, or such Love and Concord, or such a Godly People under them in the Prelates Reign?
A47813Well, well?
A47813What can I do better, then to face him with the Acts of the Assembly, and the Proceedings of the Two Houses, to the Contrary?
A47813What can more expose the Credit of the 〈 ◊ 〉 then this double- dealing in the Foreman of the Party?
A47813What did we raise Armyes for?
A47813What did you search the Word of God for, in the Case?
A47813What do you call Incapacitys?
A47813What do you think now of the Worthy Assembly?
A47813What hindred this A ● gument from holding, when the King was in Actual Possession?
A47813What hopes of Unity and Peace; or what Pretence to''t; so long as these dividing and defaming Liberties are kept a foot?
A47813What if the King should take upon him so?
A47813What if the first Publick Sticklers, were not at that time Declar''d Presbyterians?
A47813What is This, but the Asserting of Rebellio ● ● Principles?
A47813What should they cry out for against the Separatists, that are all this while, doing the Papists business to their hands?
A47813What would you say now to the turning of the Tables, and setting up of your Qualifications on the other side?
A47813When Mr. Baxter Sets up for a Toleration; wh ● ● can be fairer then to shew him his own Arguments against it?
A47813When it was in Truth, a direct Conjuration against the Government, both Ecclesiastical, and Civil, for the Introducing of it?
A47813Who Absolv''d you from the One Oath, or who Authoris''d you in the Other?
A47813Who would have thought it?
A47813Whom did we cast out of all Church- Maintenance?
A47813Whom did we ever forbid to Preach the Truth?
A47813Why are ye blowing of them again?
A47813Why do ye not Touch the Thesis that you condemn; and say This, That, and tother Aphorisme I Renounce?
A47813Why do you cite the Holy Common Wealth, so often?
A47813Why not Prelacy as ● awful after the Act, as before?
A47813Why prethee what Power did we allow him?
A47813Will you have it now that This Army, your O ● ●, and intimate Friends, did no Hurt to his Majesties Person?
A47813[ Alas?
A47813[ Do nothing which they bid you do, though otherwise Lawful] O Strange Exposition of the 4 th Commandement?
A47813[ It is not known that the Presbyterian Government hath been exercised in London, in Lancashire, and in many Counties these many years?
A47813[ Must we say nothing to such bloudly slanders?
A47813[ Nay how many Professors will rashly rail and lye in their Passions?
A47813[ Remem ● ●( say you to the Army) how far I have gone with you in the W ● ● — And shall I be affraid of my Old most Intimate Friends?
A47813[ Shall every man have leave to do evill, that can be Ignorant enough to think( or say he thinks) that he doth well?
A47813[ That the Major Part of Both Houses are the absolute Masters of the Lives and Liberties of the Subject?]
A47813[ What have we done these Twenty years against the King or State?
A47813[ What is This Prelacy?
A47813and blesse all the Providences that have brought matters so Comfortably about?
A47813and contrary to the word of God, and Apostolical Institution, Ibid P. 51. what need was there then of any further Disswasion?
A47813and to hammer into the heads of the Multitude, the danger of Re- admitting their Lawfull Soverei ● n?
A47813and to return him a Publick Counterfeit Thanks for Bloodshed; yea, for the bloud of Thousands?
A47813and why might not the Commons, cast out the Lords, and the Army the Commons, as well as the Two Houses cast off the King?
A47813if the Judgment be once perverted, and Errour hath perverted the Supreme Faculty, whether will men go, and what will they do?
A47813is there not in every corner of These Kingdomes, the Slain and the Banish''d ones of Christ to Answer for?
A47813or who are to be the Iudges of it?
A47813to give you your Lives, Liberties, and Estates again, when all was Forfeited?
A47813to the calling God into a Conspiracy against Government and Religion?
A47813to 〈 ◊ 〉 Mr. Baxter Lye down in One Opinion, and Rise, in Another ▪ 〈 ◊ 〉 Accomodating his Scruples to every Crisis of State?
A47813what Mists did you presently cast before the Peoples Eyes in your Political Aphorismes, upon the Question of Authority, and Obedience?
A47813when so many were turn''d out of the Universities for not Engaging, and so many out of the Magistracy, and Corporation- Priviledges?
A42142And all that your Church of England mislikes, must be Fanaticism, Blaphemy, and Impiety?
A42142And as they erred so grosly in such prime Articles of Christianity, why do you fear and suspect they have also erred in the rest?
A42142And did not he very commendably deny it against them all, because he judged by Scripture it was not?
A42142And do not you know, that almost all our Congregations do hold our Clergy to be no true Clergy, but as meer Laymen as you or I?
A42142And if England be so bold as to say they erred in this, what assurance can we have, but that they erred in the rest?
A42142And is it against Mans reason that he in following Years may meet other Books of Arians, Socinians,& c. and do the like?
A42142And must they be constrain''d to deny or believe, because the fallible Church of England or France will have it so?
A42142And were not Doctor Morton, Fox, Field, and Illiricus, Men of sound Judgment, eminent Learning and Godliness?
A42142And what Jesus Christ are we obliged to believe in?
A42142And what Religion shall I profess if I lay Scripture aside?
A42142And what a greater Authority has a Synod of England, for to prove a Doctrin to be of the Reformation, than a Synod of France which I have produced?
A42142And what difference betwixt you and ● he Church of Rome?
A42142And what if a Popish Priest, or Fryar, did become of our Reformed Church, can he lawfully Marry, whereas be made a Vow of Chastity?
A42142And what then?
A42142And what then?
A42142And why must Luther, Illiricus, Flaccius, and others be forced to deny those Tenets, tho''Protestants or Papists judge them to be damnable?
A42142And why should not it be lawful to any Reformed to believe this, whereas it''s Scripture as interpreted by a Man of so sound a Judgment?
A42142And why should we dare say, our King would commit any, for depriving our Clergy of those Rents?
A42142And why?
A42142And will you deny this to be the Doctrine of the Reformation, whereas it''s Scripture as interpreted by Men of so eminent and sound a Judgment?
A42142Are not Luther, Calvin, Danaeus, Ochinus as well of the Reformation, and Men of as sound Judgment as they?
A42142Are they bound to submit their Judgments to the Church of England, more than to that of Rome?
A42142Because they follow Scripture as they understand it, and this is our Rule of Faith?
A42142But can you prove this Doctrine by the Testimony of any of our Synods?
A42142But do not you see it would be a Sacrilege, that the King should deprive the Clergy of their Church Revenues?
A42142But is there no Tenet of Religion which we are all indispensably obliged to hold?
A42142But what do you think of a Child Christen''d in Popery by a Monk or a Fryar, ought he to be Christen''d again in our Reformation?
A42142But what''s the matter?
A42142By whom were they condemn''d?
A42142Can there be any Synod in England of so great Authority as our wise and prudent Parliaments?
A42142Can you deny but this was the Rule of Faith, and principle of our first blessed Reformers, and of the Church of England, mentioned in her 39 Articles?
A42142Can you prove that our Rule of Faith is Scripture, as any particular Doctor or Person of sound Judgment understands it?
A42142Consequently what is the Doctrine of the Reformation, but what any Person of sound Judgment understands to be of Scripture?
A42142Destroy it?
A42142Did Luther and Calvin forsake the Pope and Councils, for to submit their Judgments to any other?
A42142Did any teach that we may with a safe Conscience change our Religion as you say?
A42142Did ever any Apostle speak with more Courage?
A42142Do you think a Doctrin is not of the Reformation, because it''s denyed by the Church of England?
A42142Does Faith alone justify us?
A42142Does he forsake the Reformation, because he forsakes Lutherism for Calvinism?
A42142Happily?
A42142Have not we many examples of this in our best and most renowned Reformers?
A42142How can you say, I oblige you to believe false and scandalous Tenets?
A42142How long halt ye between two Opinions?
A42142I ca n''t tell, What may be the reason, think you?
A42142I know many of our Congregation mislike much our Common- Prayer Book, for these Popish- Tenets; but what do you say of the grand errours of Popery?
A42142I would gladly know, if it be lawful to chop or change the Text?
A42142If therefore this be Scripture as Interpreted by them, how can you deny it to be the Doctrine of the Reformation?
A42142Is it not the Doctrin of the Reformation that the Apostles were infallible in their Doctrin?
A42142Is not Scripture our Rule of Faith, and are we to regard what any Church or all Churches say, further than we find by Scripture that they say well?
A42142Ismael Does not our Reformation teach that''t is possible to all Men, assisted with God''s Grace, to keep the Commandments?
A42142It''s possible?
A42142Let us ask this Synod by what Rule of Faith does the Reformation walk?
A42142Methinks you become pale, something troubles you, speak, what is it?
A42142Must I believe yours against my Conscience and Knowledge?
A42142Must I not believe that the Doctrin of Jesus Christ, delivered to his Apostles and the Church is true Doctrin?
A42142Must our Rule of Faith be Scripture, as the Church of England understands it, and not otherwise?
A42142No sure; for Calvinism is as much of the Reformation as the other: Is not Protestancy as much the Doctrine of the Reformation as Presbytery?
A42142Nor was it only Luther and Calvin spoke thus, but all our first blessed Reformers; and why?
A42142Or is it not the Doctrin of our Reformation?
A42142Or must not I believe my own?
A42142Or than Luther and Zuinglius our first Reformers, inspired by God, to teach us the purity of the Gospel?
A42142Or what Rule can you give for to know what is good or evil to be done, but Scripture as understood by such Persons?
A42142Shock me?
A42142Sure you will not say this Doctrine is of the Reformation or can be safely believed?
A42142The Lord, who is the Searcher of Hearts knows, you mis- conster my intentions: How can you say I intend to beat you from the Reformation?
A42142The Popes Supremacy is the Doctrin of Popery, who doubts it?
A42142The time may come that they may believe them all, and be still as good Reformers as now they are?
A42142Was it not by the Popish Church?
A42142Was it not from Luther and Zuinglius, that England received the Doctrin of the Reformation?
A42142What Principle is this, which you seem to make the only destinctive sign of a Reformed, from a Papist?
A42142What do you infer from this discourse?
A42142What do you think of Justifying Faith?
A42142What do you think, have not we a Church on earth establisht by Christ, wherein we are to live and serve him, and believe her Doctrin?
A42142What is Calvanism, but what Calvin a particular Doctor judged to be the sence of Scripture against that same Church?
A42142What is Quakerism, but honest Naylor''s Godly and Pious Sentiments upon Scripture?
A42142What must a Man believe for to be a true Reformed?
A42142What need therefore of a Bible for to have Religion?
A42142What say you to the Presbyterians, who prefer their own Sense and Interpretation of the Bible, before that of the Church of England?
A42142What, not Paganism,, which adored a Multitude of Gods, for Christianity which adores but one?
A42142Why?
A42142Will a Presbyterian believe Episcopacy, because the Church of England says it''s the Doctrine of Scripture?
A42142Will you believe Scripture, as it is Interpreted, and in that sense which, the Church, Councils, and Fathers propound unto you?
A42142Will you say this is the Doctrine of the Reformation, or that we can without scruple believe it?
A42142You can never settle any but this, That every Man may without let or hinderance, believe what be pleases; And why should not this be a good Religion?
A42142You say they are Old condemn''d Hereticks; and does this Language become a Child of the Reformed Church?
A42142and why will you not own the Arians,& c. as your Brethren, tho''you believe the Trinity against them?
A42142can a man be a true Child of the Reformation, and yet believe the Popes Supremacy?
A42142do not I insist and perswade you to stick fast to its Rule of Faith, and acknowledge no other but Scripture, as you understand it?
A42142do not they persecute all Non- confor ● ists, as well as Popery?
A42142do you call an exchange of Paganism for Popery( introduced by Austin) a Happiness?
A42142have you met any thing in it, which shocks you?
A42142or because she persecutes the Pro ● essors of it?
A42142why was it not left in the Land?
A42142would Luther have given this liberty if Transubstantiation had not been the Doctrin of the Reformation as well as any other?
A42142you can hardly shew me any Tenet of Popery, but what is it''s Doctrin; what Doctrin more Popish than that of Confession and Absolution from sins?
A42925( 2) Whether in their person the King be represented?
A42925( 2) Whether the Bishop Collating, during the time of the Archbishop''s Visitation, and after his Inhibition, was good?
A42925( 2) Whether the Bishop could grant the Proxies to the King?
A42925( 2) Whether the Husband may sue for the Treble value without naming his Wife?
A42925( 3) Whether the Court of Delegates may pronounce Sentence of Excommunication, or not?
A42925( 3) Whether the Proxies in the hands of the King were extinct by the Unity of Possession?
A429252. wherein these Three points are specially argued,( 1) Whether the Judges Delegates may grant Letters of Administration?
A4292523 ▪ Whether a Donative in the Kings Gift may be the Cure of Soul?
A4292556. it was a question, Whether by the Grant of the Advowson of the Church, the Advowson of the Vicarage did pass?
A429259. Who is Patron of the Vicarage, whether the Parson or the Patron?
A42925A Case at Common Law touching Resignation; and whether it may be made Conditionally?
A42925A Case in Law touching a Vicarage, whether Dissolved, or not?
A42925A Question in Law, whether upon such matter of Fact an Advowson remains Appendant, or not?
A42925Aldermanus, anciently what?
A42925Also, whether an Appropriation may be made without the Kings License?
A42925An aliquid Authoritatis in hoc Regno Angliae Pontifici Romano de jure competat, plusquam alii cuicunque Episcopo Extero?
A42925And afterwards he was summoned to the Ecclesiastical Court, to say, whether he had broken his Obligation, or not?
A42925And the Question was, whether that Benefice became void by the resignation of Packhurst, or by his promotion to the Bishoprick?
A42925B. R. it was debated whether Tithes were Jure divino, or by the Constitution of men only?
A42925B. was well created Bishop?
A42925But this might be omitted; for the Question, An Filius possit Beneficiari in Ecclesia Paterna?
A42925Churchwardens not Ecclesiastical Officers, but Temporal employed in Ecclesiastical Affairs; Before whom are they to Account?
A42925Coke, Will you allow the Parson here in this place Tithe- Hay and Corn, and not Tithe- Wood?
A42925Confirmation in a Temporal, not Spiritual sense, what?
A42925Defamatory words[ Thou art a Bawd and keepest a Bawdy house] whether and where Actionable?
A42925Hay of Headlands, whether tithable?
A42925Here may arise a question, Whether there were not Parishes long before any Council at Lateran?
A42925Hutton, If Apples are upon the Trees, and taken by a Stranger, shall the Parson be hindered of his Tithe?
A42925IT is a question at this day undecided, Whether Princes or Popes were the first Authors of Appropriations?
A42925If it be demanded, whether the Ordinary can cite a man out of his Diocess?
A42925If one Grantee of the Next Avoidance Present the other Grantee of the same Avoidance, whether such Grant be void or not?
A42925In this Council a Question was moved, Whether men that were dead, might lawfully be Cursed and Excommunicated?
A42925It is Quaestio Juris, whether a Benefice be void before Sentence Judicially pronounced, albeit in the Law it be said, Quod ipso facto sit privatus?
A42925It is some question, whether the Ordinary may suffer the lapse to incurr, after it is found on the said Writ for one of the Patrons?
A42925Littleton of Counsel of the other side, Suppose the Church falls, shall he pay but Eleven shillings?
A42925Magister, dic fratri meo, ut dividat mecum haereditatem, he answer''d, Quis me constituit judicem aut divisorem super vos?
A42925Or how could Sampson under the same King be Bishop of York?
A42925Or if Lands be once discharged of Tithes by a Modus Decimandi, Q. whether the Tithes shall revive again upon failure of the Modus?
A42925Possibly it might be so; what follows thence?
A42925Q. whether the Bastard shall take by the devise?
A42925Question, if in such a Parish or such a Parish, shall be tried by the Law of the Land or of the Church?
A42925So if a Spiritual Person change his Presentation by the consent of the Ordinary, what remedy for the First after Induction of the Second a?
A42925So likewise as to the other Question, Vtrum defuncto sit Fama restituenda?
A42925Some question is, at whose costs this Writ shall be sued, whether at the Bishops, or at the parties?
A42925The Question is not, whether Procurations are due Ratione Visitationis; but whether they are only due Ratione Visitationis, and not otherwise?
A42925The Question was, Whether B. the First Grantee, not Presenting upon the First Avoidance, had lost the benefit of his Grant?
A42925The Question was, Whether before the Statute of 25 H. 8. the Pope might grant Dispensations?
A42925The Question was, Whether the Lands so purchased by the Abbot before his Surrender to the King, were discharged of the Tithes?
A42925The Question was, Whether the said Dr. N. were Non- Resident, and incurred the penalty of this Statute?
A42925The Questions were,( 1) Whether there was a Custome in that place, to give such things for Mortuary?
A42925The great Antiquity of Appropriations; a Conjecture of their Original; whether Charles Martell was the occasion thereof?
A42925The only Question was, Whether, notwithstanding all this matter, the Advowson did remain Appendant or not?
A42925The points were, Whether( 1) Si modo was a Condition in this Licence, and made the first Benefice void when he took the Second?
A42925The question is, whether the Daughter shall be Heir to her Father, or a Bastard?
A42925Thou that abhorrest Idols, dost thou commit Sacriledge o?
A42925To say[ Thou art a Drunkard or a Drunken Fellow] whether such words are suable in the Ecclesiastical Court?
A42925Two points were moved,( 1) Whether that were a setting forth within the Statute?
A42925Upon Question, whether the First Living vacavit per mortem of him or not?
A42925Whence the Archdeacons power is derived, and whether a Quare Impedit doth lie of it or not?
A42925Where hath Christ in totidem verbis forbidden Sacriledge?
A42925Whether Action lies for calling one Quean?
A42925Whether Action upon the Case for words lies against an Infant of Seventeen years of age?
A42925Whether Alien Ministers are Presentable to a Church in England?
A42925Whether Appropriations were anciently grantable to Nunneries?
A42925Whether Churchwardens are a Corporation qualified for Lands as well as Goods to the use of the Church?
A42925Whether Churchwardens may have Action for Trespass done to the Church in their Predecessors time?
A42925Whether Churchwardens, as a Corporation, may prescribe to take Lands to them and their Successors, to the use of the Church?
A42925Whether Divorce by reason of Adultery dissolves the Marriage à vinculo?
A42925Whether Institution granted after a Caveat entered, be void?
A42925Whether Institution without Induction works a Plena ● ty?
A42925Whether Parishioner shall preserve the Parsons Tithe?
A42925Whether Procurations may be payable by Custome to Archdeacons sine Visitatione?
A42925Whether Suit may be in the Ecclesiastical Court to remove an Incumbent after Induction?
A42925Whether Tithe shall be paid for Hedge- boot and Fire- boot?
A42925Whether Tithe- Wool will pass by the word Altaragium?
A42925Whether Tithes are payable of Cattel for the Dairy or the Plough?
A42925Whether Tithes may be Leased or Released without Deed?
A42925Whether a Cle ● k may strike his Servant, or another in that case the Clerk and be blameless?
A42925Whether a Clerk Simoniacally presented, but not privy to the Simony, be disabled for that turn to be presented by the King to the same Church?
A42925Whether a Commissary may Cite persons of several Parishes to appear at his Visitation- Court?
A42925Whether a Dean and Chapter be capable de non decimando their Lands?
A42925Whether a Divine, that is not a Civilian, may be a Chancellour?
A42925Whether a General Pardon doth discharge an Excommunication for Contempt precedent to the Pardon, or shall discharge the Costs of Court thereon?
A42925Whether a Presentation is revokable before Institution?
A42925Whether a Vicarage Endowed may be Appropriated, and how?
A42925Whether an Advowson may be Appropriated without a Succession?
A42925Whether an Advowson may be Assets; and under what words it may pass, or not?
A42925Whether an Advowson may be extended?
A42925Whether an Appropriation of a Parsonage without endowment of the Vicarage be good?
A42925Whether an Archbishop may call Cases to his own cognizance, nolente Ordinario?
A42925Whether an Exchange of Spirituals for Spirituals be Simony?
A42925Whether it be Simony in Ecclesiasticks to take money for Sermons or Theological Doctrines?
A42925Whether it be Simony in the Ordinaries or their Officials to take money for Letters of Ordination under Seal?
A42925Whether it be Simony to give money for the Sacrament upon a Death- Bed?
A42925Whether it be Simony to resign a Benefice reserving a Pension out of it?
A42925Whether it be Simony to resign or bestow a benefices upon Trust or Confidence?
A42925Whether one Bishop may have two Chapters?
A42925Whether the Archdeacon ought to receive the Clerk of the Testator, or of the Executors?
A42925Whether the Collatee be Incumbent, if the Bishop Collate him within the Six months?
A42925Whether the Dead may be Excommunicated?
A42925Whether the Fathers free Covenant with his Son in Law, upon the Marriage of his Daughter to present him to such a Living when it falls, be Simony?
A42925Whether the First- Fruits be due upon the Institution before Induction?
A42925Whether the Grantee of the next Presentation, not Presenting at the First Avoidance, shall lose the benefit of his Grant?
A42925Whether the High Commission- Court had power of Alimony, or not?
A42925Whether the Parson may appoint the Parish Clerk?
A42925Whether the Patron of the Parsonage, or the Parson?
A42925Whether the Quotity be Moral, or only of the Ceremonial or Judicial Law?
A42925Whether the Release of one Churchwarden, shall be a Bar to his Companion, in an Ecclesiastical Suit commenced by them both?
A42925Whether the Resignation of a Donative may be to the Donor, or how it may be departed with?
A42925Whether the Son may succeed his Father in the Church?
A42925Whether the word Dispensamus be necessary in the Letters of Dispensation for a Plurality?
A42925Whether the words Quean or Base Quean be Actionable in the Ecclesiastical Court?
A42925Whether the words[ Thou art a Pander] be Actionable at the Common Law?
A42925Whether there be any Simony Jure Humano, and by what Contracts it may be discerned?
A42925Whether these words[ Thou hast taken a false Oath] be Actionable, and in what Court?
A42925also whether it be good, being Sealed with another Seal, and done out of the proper Diocess?
A42925does a thing lawful in it self become unlawful, because a Pope enjoyns it?
A42925h Gregory?
A42925must we therefore be neither honest in payment of the one, nor charitable in giving the other, because there was a Command of a Pope in the case?
A42925or whether he be prohibited by the Statute of 23 H 8. c. 9?
A42925or whether the innocent party may remarry altera existente?
A42925the same Church?
A42925they were prohibited in England anciently by the Pope; whether they can be otherwise than by the King, or some Authority derived from him?
A42925what if he had commanded Alms to be given instead of Tithes?
A42925wilt thou therefore commit it, because he hath not in terminis terminantibus forbidden it?
A859864. or whether the semi- independents were of that minde in the Bishops daies?
A85986And what other punishment doth the Scripture appoint for Hereticks?
A85986Are not Magistrates Nurses to their people, Shepherds to their flocks, Parents to these children?
A85986Are not Magistrates like to speed well, when their subjects shall own no Law, no Rule, no Charge, but as they think good?
A85986Are not Officers like to command bravely when their souldiers must be left to their own will?
A85986Are not Parents and Governours of families in a hopefull case, when the reins are laid on the neck of children and servants?
A85986Are not errours the diseases of mens souls; and is there no way to cure them, but by letting them alone?
A85986Are not such Foxes and Wolves most mischievous under that disguise?
A85986Are not the best still minded of their emptiness, insufficiency, selfishness and unworthiness?
A85986Are not the subjects right, peace and safety, the proper gifts of God?
A85986Are not we all bound to sollicit heaven day and night, that such unclean spirits may be cast out?
A85986Are there not sins of omission, when we reprove and discountenance not evil?
A85986But are not these Christian Sheep directed also to be as wise as Serpents, to discern and repell all wolvish seducers coming in sheeps clothing?
A85986But if you let the dunghill alone, will it ever be better?
A85986But is suffering of errours a good way to that end?
A85986But may not something be pleaded for them?
A85986But what if his conscience should afterwards check him for mistakes therein?
A85986But what means this kind of answer?
A85986But what then?
A85986But what''s the end of all?
A85986But you plead conscience: Why, what do you mean?
A85986Can we finde out any better way of procuring or preserving them, than by keeping close to him, and being active for him?
A85986Can you be safe when that miscarries?
A85986Can you think a licentious liberty profitable to any man?
A85986Can you think that those persons will spare you, that spare not what is dearest to God?
A85986Could your Rhetorick prevail, what a Metamorphosis should we have in every relation and condition?
A85986Dare you then after this, charge or punish these men for breach of any Law?
A85986Did not Salomon find it the best way to Wisdom and Glory, to peace and plenty, thus to begin with God?
A85986Do not our State- Physicians finde work enough among such a variety of Bedlams?
A85986Do not the worst of men enjoy often most of the world, being fattened for the slaughter?
A85986Do they labour still to disgrace and discourage faithfull Magistrates and Ministers from promoting it?
A85986Do they want a minde to attend their own interest, who spend all their skill and strength about it?
A85986Do they want contrivers and engines, that have so many thousands of Jesuites in every corner?
A85986Do you desire freedom to say and do what you will?
A85986Do you long to try it and put us on the triall?
A85986Do you think so indeed?
A85986Doth he absolve the accessory, that punishes the Principal?
A85986Doth he not so still?
A85986Doth he not still appear against the neglecters and slighters thereof?
A85986Doth not Christ himself press this parable to that end?
A85986Doth not Gods honour deserve the preeminence still?
A85986Doth not much of it remain in the best?
A85986Gilbert, Claudius, d. 1696?
A85986Gilbert, Claudius, d. 1696?
A85986Had not Austin just cause to complain so much of his other mens sins?
A85986He answers, Had he not as good live as he lists, as live as you list?
A85986How many thousands were the better for crouding after Christ and his Apostles, though most for the loaves, or novelty sake?
A85986How soon should we see the liberty of Christianity turn''d into the liberty of Bestiality?
A85986If good men have suffered sometimes by the wresting of a good Law, or executing of an evil Law, shall it be a disparagement to good Orders and Laws?
A85986If our complexion be still Laodicean, what is our condition like to prove, but like to theirs?
A85986If we forget him, can we look to be remembred of him?
A85986If wicked men will dare both God and man in their destructive courses, and meet therein with the wages of sinne, shall they blame any but themselves?
A85986If you let the best garden alone, will it not soon grow worse, and will not the weeds spoil all at last?
A85986Is it for the Patients good that he be forsaken of his Physician or Chirurgion, and left alone undressed, unlooked to?
A85986Is it for the profit of Church or State, that their severall members should be left to their own fansie and will, to move as they list?
A85986Is it not high time then for all Superiours and others, to hearken to Christs voice speaking from heaven to us, as he did to languishing Ephesus?
A85986Is it not most rational, that the best things should have the best care from the best men?
A85986Is it not so still?
A85986Is it not the high way to hell?
A85986Is it not their business day and night, every where, to obstruct and disturb it, what they can?
A85986Is it profitable to any family or society, that the members thereof should be left in a disordered, disjointed posture?
A85986Is not Christ himself that Lamb of God, the Lion of the Tribe of Judah, that roars out of Zion against all wickedness?
A85986Is not Christs interest the best way to settle yours?
A85986Is not every man naturally full of evil, and bent to evil, empty of good, and backward thereto?
A85986Is not he a breaker of Gods command, that gives free licence to the notorious transgressors thereof?
A85986Is not he also guilty that prevents not evil, when he may?
A85986Is not mans heart full of corruption by nature?
A85986Is not this Calenture to be looked after with all diligence?
A85986Is such a confusion the way to settlement?
A85986Is that Magistrate faultless, that suffers his people to be seduced by pernicious Praters, without check?
A85986Is that Officer faithfull that lets an enemy wittingly to debauch and ruine his souldiers?
A85986Is the Gardiner faultless, that suffers carelesly the weeds to choak the good plants?
A85986Is the Patronage of lies a friendly help to Truth?
A85986Is the Physician guiltless, that willingly suffers his patient to be poysoned by Mountebanks?
A85986Is the Watch- man blameless that warns not and keeps not the thief off?
A85986Is this Libertinism the way to any true good, spirituall or temporall?
A85986Is this your egregious method of joining all Inferiors to their Superiors?
A85986Now that in words they profess to own the Scripture, how deal they with it?
A85986Retort the Query you may thus then; What horrors of conscience shall that Magistrate feel, that hath minded himself in neglecting God?
A85986Shall men for bear their food, because many surfet and riot?
A85986Shall the ravening Wolves, that watch for mens souls, be cherished and owned, because they have got on the garb of Sheep?
A85986Shall there be no wine in use, because some will be drunk?
A85986Should not a Sheep of Christ be like himself, a Lamb to God, and a Lion to sin?
A85986Should not that warning be cautiously improved, which Christ himself gives in such a juncture?
A85986Should they not then provide for their good, and labour to remove and prevent all evil, both spirituall and temporall in their proper places?
A85986Speak plain, Do you disown the Name and Worship of Christ, as too many of your comrades do in effect deny his Person and Office?
A85986The Querist objects again to himself, Then every one may live as he lists?
A85986The confounding of all things?
A85986The ruine of Church and State?
A85986There was no Writ Capiendi granted, or any compulsion by the Civil Magistrate?
A85986Was it not so in Josias and Edward 6th time?
A85986Was it not their zeal for God that made them great before God and good men?
A85986Was not the like course revived by Satan ever since the Reformation was revived by Christ, formerly and lately?
A85986Was there ever more need of that watchfull care, than in this age, and in these parts?
A85986Were not those superlative villains the fruits and effects of your desired licentious freedom?
A85986What Laws about them?
A85986What dreadfull Convulsions and Inflammations hath not such a rash zeal caused ▪ among us, both in Church and State?
A85986What else means that of Paul, Be not partaker of other mens sins?
A85986What glory can such expect from God or man, that refuse all the fair means, which might prevent such evils of sin and sorrow?
A85986What hope then of a cure that way?
A85986What hopes of help below, but in a Bedlam or Bridewell, for such?
A85986What if Moses by Gods command, did tolerate Divorce, for the hardness of their heart?
A85986What is there so good but may be abused?
A85986What mischiefs may not such Pests procure, if without restraint?
A85986What of all this?
A85986What think you of these things ye sober Christians?
A85986What wickedness might not be pleaded for by the same reason?
A85986What will become of him and of his light, if left to himself?
A85986What would become of the Protestants of France, who live under Popish Magistrates, if they should appear for compulsion of conscience?
A85986What''s a mans own light, before conversion, but the dim snuff of a candle, every moment ready to go out in a stink, into utter darkness?
A85986Whether Christ hath said he will have an unwilling people compelled to serve him?
A85986Whether compulsion of conscience was ever in practise among the Nations or Churches, till the times of Antichrist?
A85986Whether doth not the practise of compulsion of conscience among Protestants, greatly harden the Papists in their Inquisitory practises?
A85986Whether he was not reproved, that would have fire from heaven to devour those that rejected Christ?
A85986Whether it''s not a burden enough for the Magistrate to govern and judge in Civil causes, to preserve the subjects right and safety?
A85986Whether our Magistrates and Governours be not wronged, to give them the Titles of Civil Magistrates only, if their power be spirituall?
A85986Whether persecution for conscience doth not harden men in their way, and make them cry out of oppression and tyranny?
A85986Whether the Saints weapons against errors be carnall or no?
A85986Whether the Scriptures appoint any other punishment to be inflicted upon Hereticks, than rejection and excommunication?
A85986Whether the servants of the Lord are not forbidden to strive, but to be gentle towards all?
A85986Whether they that would force other mens consciences be willing to have their own forced?
A85986Whether those States, as the Low- Countries, who grant such liberty to souldiers and others, do not live quietly, and flourish in great prosperity?
A85986Whether, if no Civil Law be broken, the Civil Peace be hurt or no?
A85986Whilst we cordially mind his interest, will not he surely minde ours?
A85986Who can tame these, but the Magistrates power, under God?
A85986Who shall be Judge of the meaning of Scripture?
A85986Why then do not your ghostly Fathers in Italy and Spain study to promote this excellent art?
A85986Will Christ excuse the rest, when he condemns the false Teacher?
A85986Will any sober conscientious Christian plead for it?
A85986Will not corruption increase, if let alone?
A85986Will not the late experiences of our English Worthies, with those of the former Champions of Christ, demonstrate fully this?
A85986Will they honour you that vilifie God?
A85986and whether so long as they are hardned and confirmed by us, there be any likelihood that the Gospel should take footing in Spain or Italy?
A85986and whether that be the best way to prevent their increase and recover them?
A85986because many have their Religion to chuse, shall not the Magistrate discharge his duty for their good?
A85986do not these Nations need good Physicians, and utmost care to prevent the subversion of all?
A85986that can spare such swarms of unclean spirits and Romish locusts, to darken and devour all the budding hopes of Truth and Peace among us?
A85986that hath been carefull of the subjects bodies, but careless of their souls?
A85986that hath been zealous for Civil affairs, but frozen to the Lords interest?
A85986that hath done much for the world, but little for heaven?
A85986that thought no cost too dear for their earthly priviledge, but every little too much for spiritual help?
A85986they that walk in truth,) should be let alone?
A85986wherein the Romish Cubs swarm round about us, under the mask of Notions and new Lights?
A85986who will spare them, that so wilfully suffer for evil doing?
A47873& c. would they destroy them?
A47873''T is no prophaneness( is it?)
A47873A Due Freedom, a Due Civil Liberty, The Legal Power; — What means all this, but any thing they shall be pleased to make of it?
A47873Again, What is civil Liberty to matter of salvation?
A47873Alas, alas, the Saints have no faults; what should they weep for?
A47873Allow these People all their Askings, in what concerns their Discipline, will they rest Quiet There, without a further Hankering after more?
A47873And I beseech you what is the goodly Subject of the Controversie?
A47873And a little further, Thus, The King of England is one of those Princes who hath an Imperial Crown: What''s That?
A47873And can they that attempt so great Robbery, love God, and the Power of Godlinesse?
A47873And is not the Honor and Safety of his Majesty that now is, concern''d in these Indignities upon his Murther''d Father?
A47873And what came on''t?
A47873And what solid reason withstands the Equity of this desire?
A47873Are they not troublesome as ever both in their Writings and Contrivements?
A47873Are we, because of this mis- application, prohibited to worship the true God, in the same manner, and posture?
A47873As for the Decrees and Canons of the Church, what rightful Authority doth make them, as the Law of the Medes and Persians that altereth not?
A47873Because that in some Cases even of External Discipline, the Church is limited, does it therefore follow that it is free in none?
A47873Both claiming equal Certainty, the One, from his Judgement of Discretion: the Other, from Divine Impulse?
A47873But Bishops have descended already, and what was the event of it?
A47873But are not all recesses from Truth, more dangerous: Because in every thing we can not agree with them, must we in nothing?
A47873But had the antient Stock of Royallists no hand at all in this procurement?
A47873But say they should be opposed?
A47873But to return: Can any thing be more gentle, then A Reformation, and due Regulation of things in Church and State?
A47873But what are Words where a Crown lyes at stake?
A47873But what excuse for the Matter of the Propositions?
A47873But what if there were Disorders; by whom were they caused?
A47873But what''s the Reason of this peevishness?
A47873But what''s this case to the Subject of our Debate?
A47873But who can determine the convenient number?
A47873But why do I talk to those that stop their Ears?
A47873But why do we contest?
A47873But will some say, What signifies the intemperance of Particular tongues, as to the General of the Party?
A47873By what Authority, does Presbytery pretend to unseat the Hierarchy?
A47873By what Law, or by what Equity, do these people pretend to any Interest of Establishment in England?
A47873By whom will they be tryed, or on what Judgement, and Authority will they rest?
A47873By whom?
A47873Can any man imagine this the true and conscientious reason of the Quarrel?
A47873Can any thing be more feditious?
A47873Can not Prelacy be better restored after a Discontinuance, then Presbytery erected, where it never had a Being?
A47873Can the first Cause asserted by both Houses, in opposition to his late Majesty, be justifi''d, and not the King condemn''d?
A47873Cheek by Joul?
A47873Counsels may erre, they say, and can not Presbyterians?
A47873Did ever any man say, This is Rebellion, and I''ll justifie it?
A47873Did not St. Paul become all things to all men, that by all means he might gain some?
A47873Did not the English and Scotch Presbyters go about to dissolve Monarchy?
A47873Did the English or Scotish Presbyters ever go about to dissolve Monarchy, and to erect some other kind of Government?
A47873Does he not find that all he says is nothing, unless he can see things Invisible, and prove Negatives?
A47873Has not the Regal Power been scann''d and sifted, as well as the Ecclesiastick?
A47873Here is a numerous Party not of the dregs and refuse of the Nation, but of the judicious and serious part thereof: What will they do with them?
A47873Here is yet another gentle slip: What are Taxes to Presbytery?
A47873Here is( says he) a numerous Party, of the judicious and serious part of the Nation: what will they( the Episcopalians) do with them?
A47873Here''s Exaltation, — and Subversion; — but not a syllable of Toleration: and what''s the reason of all this?
A47873How comes this Party to be more infallible than their Neighbours?
A47873If a man asks, by what Commission Act these Zelots?
A47873If it be Discipline, What''s that to the Interest of England?
A47873If the Bishops excesses were the Cause of War, how came the Kings ruine to be the effect of it?
A47873If the English Ceremonies be warrantably used, what hinders the use of divers other Ceremonies used in the Roman Church?
A47873If they had either Modesty, or Conscience, they would not force so far: if they have neither, will they stop There?
A47873In case of Male- Administration, either in Church, or State: Whether the People may take upon them to Reform?
A47873Is This the Work of the Spirit of Pacification?
A47873Is it Liberty of Conscience?
A47873Is it Plenty and Happiness?
A47873Is it Security?
A47873Is it frequent Parliaments?
A47873Is it not enough that the King can do nothing without the Two Houses, unless they may do every thing without the King?
A47873Is it not pity that people of these milde, and complying Principles, should be charg''d with Disobedience?
A47873Is it said, their multitude will become burthensome and inconvenient?
A47873Is it the Arriers of the Army?
A47873Is it the right Administration of Justice?
A47873Is not mistaken, or perverted Scripture, the ground of all Schism and Heresie?
A47873Is not that likely to be a blessed Reformation, where Faction dictates, and Tumults execute?
A47873Is not the World compos''d of Disagreements, Hot and Cold, Heavy and Light?
A47873Is the manner of doing any thing, part of the thing done?
A47873Is the wind in that dore?
A47873Is there any thing in the Nature of Prelacy that frames the mind to Obedience and Loyalty?
A47873It starts a scurvy Question, and makes men ask, how these people came by the right they challenge?
A47873It''s truth, they are, it seems, Assertors of Lawfull Liberty, in Lawfull waies; but how is that I pray''e?
A47873No man can rationally allow one, and condemn the other: For if the Violence be Lawful; why not as well in the Field, as upon a Scaffold?
A47873Now how a Choice thus limited in the House, and Principled in the Field, should Necessarily set us right, does not to me appear?
A47873Now would I know what need of a Civil Magistrate, when even our private thoughts are subjected to the Scrutiny of a Presbytery?
A47873Now would I know, what it is that is desired: Is it Peace?
A47873Observation Beggars must be no choosers: Must we use all, or none?
A47873Observation Do none of the Woes in the Gospel belong to this talker of it?
A47873Observation He should have rather said, where is our Providence, if we admit so sure an Introduction to Confusion?
A47873Observation I would fain know which is more tolerable; for the Church to impose upon the People, or the People upon the Church?
A47873Observation What''s this cause a kin to the third Article of the Covenant?
A47873Or by what Warrant from the word of God, does a Presbyters Religion intermeddle with Popular Liberty?
A47873Or if they did, what has the Law done to offend them?
A47873Or is there any thing in Presbytery, that inclines to Rebellion and Disobedience?
A47873Poor Worms, Where is our Charity and Regard( they crye) to publick tranquillitie, if we reject the sure and only means of Concord?]
A47873Shall Ministers of this judgment be cast and kept out of Ecclesiastical Preferment and Employment?
A47873Shall Protestants destroy Protestants,( says he) for dissenting in the point of Ceremonies?
A47873Shall all private Conferences of Godly Peaceable Christians, for mutual edification, be held unlawful Conventicles?
A47873So were the Frogs that came into the King''s Chamber: and what of that?
A47873Still ad Populum?
A47873Suppose He breaks that Law, by what Law can we question him?
A47873The Service of God went merrily on, in the Thorough Reformation; did it not?
A47873They are afraid that would be granted; and how should they do then to pick a quarrel?
A47873They move for such as they believe will Tumult: if not, where lies the Hazzard?
A47873To mind the peevish of old Grievances, and in so doing to transport the honest with a just sense of new indignities; Is this the way of Peace?
A47873Very good, and to whom the Government of the State?
A47873Was not this Imputation, by the same Party, cast upon the late King, and with the same measure of Confidence and Bitterness?
A47873What could be spoken against any thing more effectual to stir hatred, then that which sometimes the antient Fathers in this case spake?
A47873What does he mean by even Ballancing?
A47873What if Six Presbyterians of Seven renounce his Moderation, and say he treated without Commission: where''s his Pacifick Coalition then?
A47873What if the Cross hath been abused?
A47873What if the Two Church- parties, can Agree, or what if they Can not?
A47873What in effect do these people now desire, but that his Majesty would rather take their Counsel, than his Fathers?
A47873What is all this to say?
A47873What is that Liberty he talks of, but a more colourable title to a Tumult?
A47873What is that Soveraign Power, which he abhorrs should be resisted by the Tumults of the People?
A47873What is the Analysis of Monarchy, but a Government by a Single Person?
A47873What means this application then of so many factious Sermons, and Libels to the People?
A47873What now if these Disciplinarians prove no Protestants?
A47873What provocation have these restless People, now to revive This Question: but an unruly Impotency of Passion against the Government?
A47873What rightful Authority?
A47873What says the Incomparable Hooker, in this point?
A47873What signifies their talk of Number, Power, Resolution, but a false Muster of the Faction, to make a party with the Rabble?
A47873What then?
A47873What was the Covenant, but a Popular Sacrament of Religious Disobedience, a Mark of Discrimination, who were against the King, and who were for him?
A47873What will its design be from age to age, but to uphold and advance his own pomp and potency?
A47873What''s more familiar then for a couple of Curs to hunt the same Hare, and when they have catch''d her, worry one another for the Quarry?
A47873Whether in Justice or Reason of State the Presbyterian party should be Rejected and Depressed, or Protected and Encouraged?
A47873Whether it be a Protestant Opinion, that the Hierarchy is Antich ● istian?
A47873Whether or no the Government of the Church by Archbishops& Bishops — be Antichristian, or Unlawful?
A47873Whether such Laws of Humane Institution, as neither contradict the general Laws of Nature, nor any Positive Law in Scripture, be binding or no?
A47873Which shall we credit, Words, or Deeds?
A47873Who Vnderstands it first?
A47873Who kept the King from his Parliament?
A47873Who of the Royal Party charges them?
A47873Why should I remember that he''s a Priest( says my Lord) if he forgets it himself?
A47873Why, if he would be quiet, who says the contrary?
A47873Will not this Argument from Search and Practice, absolve them from Obedience to the King, as well as to the Church?
A47873Will they not Bite; where they pretend to Kiss?
A47873Would they destroy them?
A47873Written by J. C. Observation I would fain know what is meant by, The Matter of Religion, as it stands here related to Civil Interest?
A47873[ Quid aliud hic statuitur, quam quod in omnibus locis, Ecclesiis restitutum cupimus?]
A47873[ To solemn Actions of Royalty, and State, their suitable Ornaments are a Beauty; are they onely in Religion a steyn?]
A47873and how will they order the matter concerning them?
A47873in matters of Discipline) do not proceed from a carual design?
A47873or have their practises been more favourable to his Majesty, than to the Clergy?
A47873or ty''d up onely to such Rites and Ceremonies, as hold no signal proportion with the reason of their Institution?
A47873or will he tell us, in the holy Dialect, that''t is the Enmity betwixt the Seed of the Woman, and the Seed of the Serpent?
A47873or with what Face can they pretend a Right to an Authority, where but by Mercy they have none to Life?
A47873shall all private conferences of godly, peaceable Christians, for mutual edification, be held unlawful Conventicles?
A47873till by their mean Abuse of his unlimited Concessions, he lost his Crown, and Life?
A47873what did the late King Grant; or rather, what Deny?
A47873what hindered then the Settlement of this Nation upon its legal Basis,( as they phrase it) if the good people had but had a mind to it?
A47873would they bear them down, or keep them under hard conditions?
A47873— And yet we see those Oppositions are by the means of middle, and Conciliating mixtures wrought into a Compliance?
A7631625. where speaking of the Remission of sin by the blood of Christ, he mentioneth not sin indifinitely, but Sins that are past?
A7631630. contrary to reason: Why doth one Christian smart rather then another?
A763166. since both Texts do preach and press the same duty?
A76316A Law may be acknowledged, and a written Law; and yet not the Law of Moses, not the Moral Law: What then?
A76316Again, the Spirit saith, Thy sins are forgiven; Is man justified because the believeth this word?
A76316All at once?
A76316And how do we believe in him, if we do not apply our selves to him for remedy?
A76316And is he a Christian that will not succor a Christian, though perhaps a Papist or a Sectary against a Turk?
A76316And is it not so also in the New- Testament?
A76316And is not this, I pray you, a very satisfying evidence?
A76316And is the Moral Law notwithstanding all this abolished?
A76316And what shall we say; Do the Apostles in these Texts call men back again to the yoke of Bondage?
A76316And who can doubt but that sincerity of Obedience must needs be a ground of comfort and confidence?
A76316And whose conscience doth not tell him, that his sin hath procured these things to himself?
A76316And why then should it hold only in the fifth Petition, and in none of the other?
A76316Are any sanctified but by the Communion of Christs spirit?
A76316Are they excused or pleaded for?
A76316Are we not often weary of that service to which God doth call us?
A76316Because, hard it is to know both what it is to love, and who is a Brother: And till these be known, how can we try our selves by the Sign?
A76316But who can know that this or that man is a Brother?
A76316But who can truly say, I love the Brethren; if those be acts, effects and properties of love?
A76316By his knowledg — And what is that?
A76316Can he by his profession and Preaching obtain a part in Christ, and a pardon of this wilfulness?
A76316Can it be found in any that have not received the Spirit of sanctification?
A76316Can that that is full of failings speak peace?
A76316Do they I say rest in it; or do they expect to receive their Assurance by some irradiation and immediate revelation of the spirit?
A76316Do they rest therein without a check?
A76316Do we rejoyce in Afflictions as the tokens of Gods Love, and count it all joy to fall into divers Tentations?
A76316Doth Saint Paul in those words set down the judgement of men, touching the state of Nature, or rather the minde of God?
A76316Doth any man know this but God alone?
A76316Doth not Saint Paul tread in the same steps?
A76316Doth not Saint Peter make use of the same Motive to press the same duties?
A76316Doth not this Brotherhood confist in being united unto Christ?
A76316Doth not this Communion presuppose an Union?
A76316Doth our Saviour herein teach Popery, or doth he cross the Doctrine of Free grace and Justification without Merits?
A76316Doubtless it is: Was it not useful, yea needful for Adam in Paradise though a righteous man?
A76316For saith Christ, He shall not speak of himself, but what he shall hear, that shall he speak: And what is that which the Spirit heareth?
A76316For why?
A76316For why?
A76316For why?
A76316For why?
A76316From the very hour of Christs Passion?
A76316From whose dictating is it penned?
A76316Grant indeed that these risings and repinings are in us, but are they setled in the h ● ● rt, are they habituated?
A76316Had sanctification a greater influence upon their Spiritual estate then it hath upon ours?
A76316Hath he in him more seeds of sin then another?
A76316Hath it none Office in the time of the Gospel?
A76316He that is the Spirit shall lead you into all Truth: How so?
A76316Him that cometh to me, I will in no wise cast out?
A76316How can that be?
A76316How doth it vex if it be not there?
A76316How more sure?
A76316How then can it secure a man that he hath Interest in Christ?
A76316I demand, Whether a Believer, suppose him to live and dye in the wilful neglect of that Sacrament, can be saved?
A76316I grant it, No doubt but the Gospel doth hold out Christ to all, none exempted, Jew nor Gentile; But how?
A76316I would gladly ask these men, Whether the justified person be exempt from sinning, yea or not?
A76316If ignorance, good reason that as yet the party be excused from punishment, till farther information?
A76316If not all, How then shall any one know whether his part and portion be in that Many, or not?
A76316If not, why is that exchanged for this?
A76316If there be nothing added by Baptism to complete the state of a Christian, why is it enjoyned?
A76316In the former saith our blessed Saviour, He that believeth not, is condemned already; How so?
A76316Is he a man that would not succor a man, though a Heathen or Turk, against a Lyon or a Bear?
A76316Is he not given to reveal these things?
A76316Is it from the clearness of the Argument?
A76316Is it not a Guide to conduct him, a Goad to quicken him and put him on if he slacken his pace in the path of Holiness?
A76316Is it not evident, that except all sinners promiseuously receive this benefit, there is no certainty of Comfort in the conclusion?
A76316Is it not that which is already contained in the scriptures?
A76316Is it not the same God who spake to the Fathers by the Prophets, and to their Children by Christ and his Apostles?
A76316Is it of no use and service to the Church of God, to Believers now in the Constitution of the Church of Christ?
A76316Is it to take directions from the Law for our ways and walkings?
A76316Is it to yield obedience to the Law?
A76316Is not sincerity the singleness of the heart, and zeal the earnestness of the spirit?
A76316Is not that Union with Christ, sealed to us in our Baptism?
A76316Is not the Text of St Paul plain, Do good to all, but especially to the Houshold of Faith: And why to them especially?
A76316Is not this a gross mistake?
A76316Is not this in effect to tell the Apostle he speaks absurdly, and sets down a mark of knowing, which can not be known?
A76316Is not this to call for an outward Authority to incline the Heart to that which it hath none affection nor inclination?
A76316Is not, saith he, the Spirit of God, the Spirit of Revelation?
A76316Is the spirit less careful of the Church now, then in times past?
A76316Is there any Transgression where no obligation to obedience?
A76316Is there any here said to be perfected by that one sacrifice, but they that are sanctified?
A76316Is there any thing to be done?
A76316Is there then any Universal Reconciliation and Justification taught in the Text of Scripture?
A76316Is this Law of Moses all of it altogether abolished?
A76316Is this therefore no sign or mark of our spiritual condition which St. John hath set down?
A76316It may be so, but what then?
A76316May we not see, as the mercy of God shadowed forth in those sacrifices of Expiation, so the Duty of the sinner expressed in those Legal Purifications?
A76316No doubt of it, perfect Remission will follow, because satisfaction is made and accepted: But when?
A76316No mote in the eye, no thorn in the flesh, when we feel the pain and pricking of it?
A76316Not by the works of mans Righteousness, but by Faith in Christ is man justified: How so?
A76316Or doth it flow fro 〈 … 〉 y Fountain, but an heart principled with the Spirit of Christ?
A76316Or from the cloudiness of his understanding?
A76316Sanctified persons then are perfected by that one sacrifice; Yet how perfected?
A76316Shall justifie, is a verb of the future tense, the work then at that time was not done: the Question is, when was it to be done?
A76316That therefore one sort may not compell the other: For why?
A76316That you must not make the credit of this voice of the Spirit to depend upon the Word, i. e. to receive credit from it; And why not?
A76316The Rule of the Law?
A76316The elect have their sins taken away before they do believe, But how?
A76316The good esteem that Christians have of us; Will this secure the soul against sadness and sorrow?
A76316The point is touching sincerity, and his proof is by an instance of zeal: Is there no difference?
A76316The usual way; Nay is it not the only way?
A76316The worldly Tabernacle of Moses, was it not a figure and patern of Heavenly things?
A76316This being so, Why are we blamed for pressing men to holiness, and encouraging them in it by putting them in minde of that reward which is provided?
A76316This is plain; but that is farther to be enquired, How cometh sin to trouble and vex the conscience, if it be taken away?
A76316This is soon said, But how is it proved?
A76316To close up all: Is the Conscience terrified?
A76316True, but wherein consisteth that essence of Faith?
A76316True, if they will be of the Works of the Law, they shall be under the Curse: But what is it to be of the Works of the Law?
A76316Well, But this Pardon is to all Theeves, is it not, if they will come in?
A76316Well, But to what end should these threatnings be used, since Christians need not fear them: How so?
A76316Well, but the question is, Whether that the subject matter of this new Commandment and of the old, be not in both the same?
A76316What text of Scripture, what Argument from any text of Scripture?
A76316What then?
A76316Whence is it, that sin doth trouble and terrifie the Conscience?
A76316Why so?
A76316Will not this be found a sensless gloss, nay an utter perverting of our Saviours intention?
A76316Will they say, that this sevice is mercenary?
A76316contrary to experience: What Father doth correct his childe for a fault not yet committed?
A76316in praying and fasting?
A76316once for all?
A76316was it so with them, and may it not be so with us?
A76316will not Satan suggest, What if they be deceived?
A76316— Is not the end of these Duties, to be delivered from Danger?
A47908( But what if they will not consent to give Accompt?)
A47908( as who should say: the times are Ill God wot, already, and likely to be worse) what a Buzze is here, with a Sting in the Tayle of it?
A47908( for that''s the point) What signifies the Multitude, but a number of single Persons, where each Individual acts, and accompts for himself?
A47908( says St. Paul) Is the Law, Sin?
A47908All Popular Attempts upon change of Government, are hazzardous to the Undertakers; are there therefore no Rebellions?
A47908And has not the Practice of These men made good the worst that any man can say, or think of their Designe?
A47908And if you may mistake in any thing, may it not be in as great things as these?
A47908And still we lose;( I would I could not say) with Reason too: for what''s Presbytery, but a more shameful and Intolerable Popery?
A47908And their Thanks- giving- feasts, and Sermons; — were they not Entertainments, and Discourses, of Joy, and Triumph for the Disasters of his Majesty?
A47908Are not their Contradictions upon Record?
A47908Are not( in good time be it spoken) your very Vows, and Covenants, arrant Riddles?
A47908Are we not All made of the same Lump; —( — born to the same Ends: — Dignify''d with the same Reason?
A47908At This Rate, what do they offer, in a Primitive Episcopacy?
A47908But all this while, why a Petition for PEACE?
A47908But does not the Church know our consciences as well as we know one anothers?
A47908But how have they submitted?
A47908But is Re- ordination( say they) so new and strange a thing?
A47908But it is better to obey God then Man, they''l tell us, Has the Church any jurisdiction over our souls?
A47908But what need we look further then our own Memories?
A47908But what( say I) if Christ should find Schismaticks kept in for able Ministers?
A47908But why to the People first?
A47908But will you see now how that Noble Prelate was bayted by five of our new- fangled Primitive Bishops?
A47908Call you This, Beating down of Popery and Prophannesse?
A47908Can any thing be beneficial to Particular Persons, that is Destructive to the Community?
A47908Can it be expected, that we should all be past erring about the smallest Ceremonies and Circumstances of Worship?
A47908Can the whole Perish; and the Parts''scape?
A47908Can you tell me Whether old Olivers Physicians or his Intelligencers, had the better Trade on''t?
A47908Content; What is it to be Factious, but to promote, and stir up Disaffections against the stated Government?
A47908Did ever Presbyters set footing any where, and Blood or Slavery not go along with it?
A47908Did not we swear, than an Impulse of Conscience transported us into our first Engagement?
A47908Do not Pharisee, and Puritan begin with a Letter?
A47908Do these men Preach, and yet complain of a Restraint?
A47908Do they not daily Preach, Write, Print against Episcopacy; in opposition to the Express Intent, and Letter of the foresaid Declaration?
A47908Do they not now expect to reap the fruits of their Disloyal Labours?
A47908Do they not prejudge the Synod, to which that Declaration referrs them?
A47908Do we not find mens Minds, and Humours as various as their Complexions, or their Faces?
A47908Do we say People may not be compell''d?
A47908Does not our Blessed Saviour himself bid us, BEWARE of the Leven of the Pharisees which is HYPOCRISY?
A47908Does not our Saviour tell us, his Kingdome is not of this World?
A47908Does not this way of Reasoning, root up all Government?
A47908First, VVithout Repentance can there be any Salvation?
A47908For at the Beginning was, nor Peasant, nor Prince; And who( the Divel) made the Distinction since?
A47908For, when the Holy War was finish''d, did not you fall together by the Ears, among your selves, about the meaning of it?
A47908HAd Zimri Peace that slew his Master?
A47908Had Zimri Peace?
A47908Had it not been a most preposterous course, to have directed the manner of our Worship, before they had laid the foundation of our Faith?
A47908Had not these Gentlemen now as good have let the old Bishop alone, as have taken the Dorr?
A47908Have they been faithful to their Friends?
A47908How do they know?
A47908How much more then when he says to Thee, — Wash and be clean?]
A47908How shall I reconcile that Reverence I bear your Character, with the just Indignation due to your Actings?
A47908If Christ( they say) should find that able Minister cast out for a Schismatick?
A47908If a Papist asks a Presbyterian where his Religion was two hundred years agoe?
A47908In fine; Where did our Saviour either command, or forbid any Particular Posture of the Body?
A47908Is Bishop Hall so much emprov''d since he Dy''d?
A47908Is That the Piece shall rise in Judgement against us?
A47908Is This according to the Rule?
A47908Is This your Gospell- work to provoke Subjects against their Soveraign?
A47908Is This, Conscience?
A47908Is Treason, Blood, and Sacriledge, so Light, and yet the Common- Prayer- Book, or a blameless Ceremony, a Burthen so Intolerable?
A47908Is it not That you mean?
A47908Is it not for matter and Phrase at least as agreeable to the holy Scriptures?
A47908Is not this Character most bitterly like the humour of the men we wote of?
A47908Is that it then they would be at?
A47908Is this fair Play my Masters?
A47908It seems a Presbyter in the Chayre, is not Infallible: why may they not mistake themselves as well in the Bishops opinion as in his Character?
A47908It seems they do not like the Form of the Church: — nor the Church Theirs; where lyes the Authority betwixt them?
A47908It will be urg''d perhaps, What has this scribling Fellow to do with the publick?
A47908Lastly, where lies the necessity of insisting upon so many variations, as are already prov''d to be utterly unnecessary?
A47908May they not argue likewise from our Practises, against our own Demands?
A47908Must we not therefore Pray at all: for want of a strict Scriptural Direction in what Posture?
A47908Next; Why so many?
A47908Now what''s all this, to the Exteriour mode of Worshipping?
A47908Now, put the case, they would Conform: should That give them a Title to the Continuance of an Ill- got Possession?
A47908Now, why should others trouble us, only for doing That which in our places they would do Themselves?
A47908OUr Liturgy was very much to blame sure: Seventy Six Quarto- Pages to reform it?
A47908Once more for All; what is the Kings Person to the Church- Ceremonies?
A47908Once more; who knows but they have chose this Juncture, for some yet more malicious ends?
A47908Or do you know who it was that was so monstrous Earnest to have had me to Bridewell for my CAVEAT?
A47908Or may they not forget their Proposalls they have offer''d, as well as the Injuries?
A47908Or will they shew, wherever he pass''d a Contradiction upon himself?
A47908Pray''e what''s the difference betwixt Addition to Gods Worship, in Words, or in Actions?
A47908Put these together, and what would this Allowance fall short of a Presbyterian Government?
A47908Rule with his Presbyters,( they cry) and will not that content him?
A47908Say Gentlemen Commissioners, may not a Christian without breach of Charity, suspect a Second Part to the same Tune, from such Reformers?
A47908Secondly, VVhy will not you swear to obey Bishops, as well as ye Covenanted to destroy them?
A47908Shall we be laid aside now for our Consciences?
A47908So that in fine, if the Church can not grant, what the Reformers can not but ask; Whether shall the Law yield to a Faction, or the Faction to the Law?
A47908Submission?
A47908Suppose them not bound to hinder all Non- Conformists, are they therefore bound to admit all?
A47908That is, Whether shall One be the Judge of all the Rest; or all the Rest be the Judge of that One?
A47908That prostitutes so many Millions of Free- born Christians, to the Command of any Single Person?
A47908The Church, for Order sake, and Uniformity, enjoyns one form, or Posture; This, or That,''t is Indifferent; where lyes the Conscience of Refusing?
A47908The Liberties you challenge, must be allow''d again by You to the People: and where''s your Holy Discipline then?
A47908The Liberty of the Primitive Times,& c.] what Primitive Times?
A47908They say, the Law makes the Offender: may they not charge the Decalogue, by the same rule?
A47908They seem to allow of a Set- form of Words, why not of Actions too?
A47908They talk of Conscience: so Peters, their fellow- labourer, was a man of conscience; was he not?
A47908They''re sad they say, when were they other?
A47908Thirdly, VVhy is it not as lawful for Bishops to silence Presbyterians, as for Presbyterians to extirpate Bishops?
A47908Thirdly; they were to Treat; They did so; and the debate prov''d Fruitless: Where lyes the Fault I pray''e?
A47908This is enough to clear the Authority of the Institution; But That, they''ll say is not the Question?
A47908Unless they intend to make use of them?
A47908VVE crave leave to ask, whether you do not your selves in some things mistake, or may not do so for ought you know?
A47908VVHy did not the Reformers rather say?
A47908Was ever any thing more sourly Superstitious, then their Monthly- Fast?
A47908Was not Church- Government REFORM''D?
A47908Was not the Kings Power REFORM''D too?
A47908Was not the whole Crew of the late Conspirators, clad in the Livery of Gods People?
A47908We talk of Jesuits; What is a Jesuite, but a Presbyterian Papist?
A47908Were it not Breach of Trust in These to whom the Care of the Publique is committed, to gratifie a Private Scruple, by a General Inconvenience?
A47908Were not Proselytes, as well as Jews always taken for the Sons of Abraham?]
A47908What Gospell do these Precisians live by?
A47908What Law would their Conformity offend?
A47908What Mirmidon, or hard Dolopian What Savage- minded rude Cyclopian?
A47908What Remedy then, when betwixt Law, and Conscience, there is a real Disagreement?
A47908What do these Creatures keep a coil with Sin for?
A47908What now if all these big Pretences fall to nothing: and they Themselves at last prove the Obstructours of what they seem so eagerly to Promote?
A47908What shall we say then?
A47908What signifies the necessity of Their Discipline to Our Peace?
A47908What was the true ground then of this their Beastly dealing with His Majesty?
A47908What were all Articles and Ties of Honor, more then Bulrushes, when they could gain by breaking them?
A47908What were their Mock- fasts, but Religious Cursings of their most Sacred Sovereign?
A47908What, Sir John B — too?
A47908What?
A47908Where are we Then, but in an universal State of War?
A47908Where did they ever any thing without the Independents?
A47908Who Questions them, but they that Question''d as well our Form of Government?
A47908Who are the common Adversaries now?
A47908Who shall be Judge, the People, or the Church; Which is Christ''s Flock?
A47908Who shall distinguish now betwixt a Case of Schisme, and Conscience?
A47908Who, They take away Bishops?
A47908Why did we compel Them then?
A47908Why do not our Precise Scripturists, as well Pray, Prostrate too, as Communicate, Sitting?
A47908Why not DOEST thou Believe, as well as[ DO YOU believe?]
A47908Why not JOYN''D; — in the Marriage office, as well as CONJOYN''D?
A47908Why not WEDDED Wife — and Husband, as well as MARRIED?]
A47908Why should these men be Trusted, without an Oath, according to the Law, that have so freely sworn, against the Law?
A47908Why?
A47908Will any man confess himself an Heretique?
A47908Will these Gentlemen subscribe to the Bishops Episcopacy by Divine Right?
A47908Will they be tempted to think Ill, of what they suffer by?
A47908Would not a Searching Sermon now and then upon this Subject, do as much good as a Discourse of humane Impositions?
A47908Would our Reformers have had the Church order''d, before it was gather''d?
A47908Would you be willing to be thus Impos''d upon?
A47908Yet this they are not very earnest in; allow them onely the Liberty of the following Ages] and what was that I beseech ye?
A47908You count it nothing then, after three Prentiships spent in the Royal Cause, to be bespatter''d by those very persons that overthrew it?
A47908[ If the Prophet had commanded thee a great thing, would''st thou not have done it?
A47908and bids us render unto Caesar the things that are Caesars?
A47908and may not the Church as well suspect that we do not think Thus or So, as we affirm that others do?
A47908and what use can they make, but Violence?
A47908and whether your understandings are not still imperfect, and all men differ not in some opinion or other?
A47908and why may not you as well be forc''d to take a lawful Oath, as you forc''d others to an Unlawful one?
A47908and yet, at last, what was the Event, but Tyranny, and Bondage?
A47908any right of Imposing upon our Consciences?
A47908but to beget a thorough- disaffection to the Establish''d Liturgy?
A47908but where they ought to have put on Sackcloth?
A47908but who shall make them see more, then they have a mind to see?
A47908has not the Nation, in all Quarters, the witnesses of their very Tongues and Pens against them?
A47908have they so soon forgot, who sav''d them?
A47908he might as well ask him, where''t will be two hundred years hence?
A47908imply that some things there are which God does not comcommand; and that in those Cases we are at Liberty?
A47908is better pleased with Re- ordination, Subscription and Ceremonies, than with the saving of Souls, by the means of his own appointment?
A47908or what a Presbyterian but a Reform''d Jesuite?
A47908or, without Confession and Restitution, any Repentance?
A47908says a Private Person: Would you be willing to be thus contemned?
A47908what then, good Brethren?
A47908what then, good people?
A47908what''s the Quarrel?
A47908what; would the Bishops be as absolute as Popes?
A47908when the same thing may be Lawful to one, and Vnlawful to another?
A47908where will these men begin their Reckoning?
A47908where''s the Danger?
A47908— Do not you Jeast sometimes, when ye professe to love the King?
A47908— Do they first know what''t is, To RULE in CONSOCIATION?
A47908— What is it Then, but an Injurious Custome, and oppression, that puts the Difference betwixt Governours, and Slaves?
A47908—''T was ask''d me — Can any man be sav''d without Repentance?
A85414& c. How long will this Great Goliah of the Presbyterians thus boast himselfe?
A85414( I can not think they will refuse it) would they in such a case imprison banish or cause Hereticks to die in this their Principality?
A85414All the principles which concerne coercive Discipline in, about, or for the Church are common both to Papists and Presbyterians?
A85414And Thirdly, Vpon what ● ● ● all and inditement?
A85414And doe you so soone boggle at the same Querie afterwards?
A85414And doe you thus require them?
A85414And why may not the Civil Magistrate as well excommunicate, as banish or otherwise punish any Hereticks?
A85414Are not all such condemned for unproffitable servants who put a candle under a bushel?
A85414Are not both Houses of Parliament, are not millions of the people enough to do justice in such a case?
A85414Are their soules not worth saving?
A85414Are they not damned because they doubt thereof?
A85414Are we thus leap''t out of the Popish frying- pan into the midst of Presbyterian firebrands?
A85414Are you not asham''d thus to uncover the nakednesse of your Churches?
A85414At what time the Church Officers be negligent in their charge, not willing to reforme; and when they oppresse any man with Ecclesiasticall censures?
A85414Because Papists do ill in compelling Protestants to heare an Idolatrons Masse; may not Protestants do well to force Papists to heare Godly sermons?
A85414But do we not by dayly experience in all places and houses find the Independents wrangling with the Presbyterians about Church controversies?
A85414But is it fitting then for everie man to be of what religion he will?
A85414But must all the world bee mad or sottish to beleeve you?
A85414But put the case you did really desire the New- English their conversion?
A85414But what if the Civill Magistrate be without, not of the Church?
A85414But what shall I say unto you, since according to your Theologie, nothing is so likely to prevaile with you as cudgelling?
A85414But you will say, you fast and pray; you mean and hope well; May not a companie of Tinckers and Coblers say the like?
A85414By their cruel persecuting or tormenting Christians?
A85414By what authoritie does the Civil Magistrate punish a Heretick?
A85414Can the Priests in Frame, the Divels in Hell, or Presbyterians anywhere, do worse by Protestants?
A85414Can you not let him have the lesser of Excommunication and other Ceremonious( in comparison of Civil Coercive) Censures?
A85414Can you or any Synod say they are, or will be at any time, at their pleasure infallibly assisted by the Holy Ghost?
A85414Conventicles where so many several doctrins are taught?
A85414Did not Nature engrave it in the hearts of al men, that it is better to obey God than man?
A85414Did not the Apostles for our clearer understanding resolve it when''t was made a question?
A85414Did they not refuse to joyn with the Cavaliers in fighting against the Scots?
A85414Doe not all punishments inflicted for spiritual offences, equally become spiritual?
A85414Does it not remaine then, that wee should consider which of them is accompained with the greatest inconveniences?
A85414For adding to it is ipso facto altering, and it is said thou shalt not adde thereto?
A85414For lapping up their tallent in a napkin?
A85414For not strengthning others after they themselves are converted?
A85414Have not the Independents fought for the Parliament against the Cavaleers?
A85414How can King, Parliament, or Synod wrest it from him?
A85414How know you which is Gods ● ● oure for convincing of a man?
A85414If Jesuited Papists and other subtle Hereticks be suffered, will they not likely seduce many unto their erroneous by- pathes?
A85414If a combination of any people should thus compasse the death of any man, would they not all equally bee found guiltie?
A85414If not; Why doe you take so much upon you?
A85414If there be but one true religion, why should we suffer above one religion in a Country?
A85414If this Disciplin be strictly observed; How can they possibly attaine to better light and knowledge?
A85414Is it not a pious act to compel a companie of carelesse idle people to hear a good sermon, to do a good work whether they will or no?
A85414Is it not an ungodly thing to suffer men to be of any religion?
A85414Is it not equally impossible for a Church- Society as for a Cytie to continue long without a Government?
A85414Is it not secondarily in the people, as well as Civil power which you affirme in the same page?
A85414Is not this to adde to Scripture?
A85414May it not prove the neerest home, according to the proverb?
A85414May not diversity of opinions cause dissentions or breach of love in a Country or Cyttie?
A85414May not the Civil Goverment interpose to punish such Church- members with whom the spiritual, by reason of their refractorines can not prevaile?
A85414May not the permitting men to teach and imbrace new opinions be occasion that we quite loose old truthes?
A85414Must we then suffer men to run headlong in the way to Hell, if they have neither will nor understanding to prevent it of themselve ●?
A85414Must your conscience therefore become a rule, a yoake to other mens?
A85414Nay, to alter it?
A85414Nay, what thinke you?
A85414Nay, will he not plead non- age?
A85414Oh that you would but ba ● e us these impertinencies, these inconsistencies ▪ how many fair sheetes of paper would it have saved from fowling?
A85414Or is it not necessary they should be spiritual to work a Spiritual effect?
A85414Or their Country not worth living in?
A85414Or why may not the Old- English be thought as charitably on, or find the like favour from your over dilligent Presbyerie?
A85414Ought we not then at least to keepe our different opinions and religion unto our selves in obedience to the Civil Magistrate that co ● maunds it?
A85414Secondly, For what cause does the Civil Magistrate punish this Church Offender?
A85414That if as yet wee have but some degrees of truth and knowledge, it shall be impossible for us to attain to greater?
A85414That though we were in possession of the true Religion, wee should bee liable to have it taken from us by everie sharper Civil sword than our owne?
A85414To tell us and them that the Presbyterian world takes up a religion and government upon trust?
A85414To which I answer, that your Ministers and you too, may bee rash in saying so, as you are in other matters: Who can hinder you?
A85414What if hee become Heretical, Schismaticall ● must he ● not bee proceeded against by the utmost of Church censures, to wit, excommunication?
A85414What if it should seeme to you the farthest way about?
A85414What if the Civill Magistrate will not learne Gods will by the Ministers of the Church?
A85414What if you can not find one of them in a fat Benefice?
A85414What is it he punishes him for?
A85414What mean they by one true religion, one way, one faith?
A85414What power hath the King or Parliament to intrude and force upon the Kingdome new religions or a tolleration of all Sects?
A85414Where find you such an authoritive power as is by you insinuated?
A85414Where find you that it would be either for Gods glorie, or the Churches weale it should be so?
A85414Whether can the Gospel bee truly and throughly propagated without such infallible officers?
A85414Whom God therefore had mercie on) shall rise up in judgement against all Protestants which know Gods will and do it not?
A85414Will not this smal pittance of ingenuity reconcile you( how fierce soever) unto the Independents?
A85414Will you not say good cause why, because the Presbyterians would quickly heave them out, and get themselves ● n?
A85414You ask What power hath either King or Parliament to intrude and force upon the Kingdome new religions or a toleration of all Sects?
A85414You say, that what seemeth good to the Holy Ghost, should likewise seeme good to all Ministers; I say so too; but not contrariwise?
A85414],[ London?
A85414and last of all, Where find you that a certain nomber of Ecclesiasticall men, may be the Representative Church of the whole world?
A85414avoyd this consequence?
A85414because you are rash to say you know not what?
A85414binds them over remedilesse, give other sentence?
A85414calls the Apologists a Sect?
A85414can you not with Paul be contented that God should judge him?
A85414disquiet the people of God?
A85414does improperly and unmannerly) the Scotch Presbyterian disciplin in England, more than the Independency of New- English Churches?
A85414especially whether they will or no?
A85414himselfe, will you put your selfe in an impossibilitie of ever being reformed except tumultuously or illegally, both waies compulsively?
A85414his doctrine bee turned out, or cut off from the Civill State?
A85414is it possible to reconcile the Civil Magistrate unto the spirituall office- bearers in such a case as this?
A85414ought you not to endeavour their conversion equal to your brethrens of Old- England, and that as well unto your Disciplin as to your doctrin?
A85414so dull, so stupid, so voide both of Civil and Christian policie?
A85414thus play at fast and loose?
A85414were not this to hang the Christian libertie of the whole Church Militant upon the arbitrary proceedings of some few perticular congregations only?
A85414yea, and that in all humane probability they are like to be crossed?
A85414yet for a farther setling of it?
A85414you approve of them in suffering no opinions to be published but their owne?
A70803& quomodo?
A70803( and who, besides the Light of Nature, have All the Instruments of Grace too,) if We shall sin against the light of so clear a Knowledge?
A70803( not to abuse our own Persons by any Intemperance or Debauch?)
A70803( not to rob him of the service, nor to defraud him of the honour that''s due unto him?)
A70803( unless I may except the Days of Hildebrand, when Hell is said to have broken loose?)
A70803* Cùm quaeritur, Quid Tres?
A7080314?
A7080316. a Cum foeminâ semper esse,& non cognoscere foeminam, nonne plus est quàm mortuum suscitare?
A70803And how was that, but by abstaining from the Appearance at least of all unrighteousness?
A70803And if the Brightness of the Sun is enough to strike the Beholder Blind; How can we safely gaze on Him, to whom the Sun is but a Shadow?
A70803And is not His Command that we do a Good thing, as valid as his Command that we abstain from what is evil?
A70803And know ye not( saith S. James) that the Friendship of the world is Enmity with God?
A70803And shall not God obtain a hearing, when he speaks to us by his Son?
A70803And then how damning a Sin is Schism, whereof Haeresie is but a Part, as I shew''d before?
A70803And then how easily do they fall, Even at every little thrust of Applause, or Plenty?
A70803And therefore by this the Prophet David seeks to prove his Affection to God Almighty; Do not I hate them ▪ O Lord, that hate Thee?
A70803And what numbers of Solifidians do make it difficult to be sav''d, by making it easier than God will have it?
A70803And what, to live Godly, but to deal justly with God himself?
A70803And what, when parted from the Soul, but the food of Worms?
A70803And why for the Lord''s sake, if not because the Lord hath so appointed?
A70803And why should that be, if not for want of true Belief, or else of due Consideration, that the Old and New Testament are God''s own word?
A70803And why should this be so little heeded,( if''t is really believ''d) unless because it is so cheaply, and so commonly to be had?
A70803But what kind of Abstinence is here intended?
A70803But yet how many of our Fiduciaries do miss of heaven, meerly by thinking they can not miss it?
A70803Can any Pride be more monstrous, than for vile Dust and Ashes even to Deifie It self?
A70803Can any be farther from Humility, than They who know nothing, and yet are proud of their Knowledge?
A70803Did ever People hear the like?
A70803Do they make very long Prayers?
A70803Do they pretend their being warranted by an immediate Revelation?
A70803For Hatred, Variance, Emulations, Wrath, Strife, Seditions, what are they all, but several Members or Concomitants of Schism?
A70803For are not they the greatest Atheists, who( to use S. Paul''s words of the antient Gnosticks) profess to know God, but in their works deny him?
A70803For how many Trades are there, very lawfull in themselves, which yet by us of the Clergy can not lawfully be driven?
A70803For in the Infancy of the Church, before printing was invented, what care and cost were men at, to write out Copies of the Gospel?
A70803For may we be at Peace with them, who will not be at Peace with God?
A70803For one Scruple in the Conscience, how many are there in the stomach?
A70803For what Pretense can they have for their separating from us, if they think us Christ''s Members, as well as They?
A70803For what can be better in it self, than to side with the Spirit against the Flesh?
A70803For what else can be the meaning of that saying in S. James, that if a man keep the whole Law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all?
A70803For what is Plainness, but Perspicuity?
A70803For what is the Body, in its original, but Dust and Ashes?
A70803For what were this but to find fault with the sublimity of the matter?
A70803For what( I pray) is the Church of England, but a most Renowned and National Church?
A70803For when as yet we lay weltring and polluted in our Bloud, how did he save us as so many Brands pluck''d out of the Burning?
A70803For who would not fight even for fear, that he shall lose such a Reward?
A70803Hast thou not procured this unto thy self, in that thou hast forsaken the Lord thy God?
A70803Have they a readiness and facility in citing Scripture?
A70803He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him, also freely give us all things?
A70803How did the faithfull City become an Harlot?
A70803How many Cases are try''d in Law, for one in Conscience?
A70803How many Counsellors are consulted, and set on work, for one Casuist?
A70803How many Empiricks are sought to, for here and there a single Confessor?
A70803How many Miles did men go, in the heathen World, to hear but a Socrates, or a Pythagoras, a Plato, or a Plotinus?
A70803How many Miles went a Queen, to hear the Apophthegms of Solomon?
A70803How many are there in the world in whom Extremities have concenter''d?
A70803How much more might his Apostles be distrustfull of Believers, who knew them not?
A70803How patiently did he permit the Disobedience of the First Adam, and Crucifixion of the Second?
A70803I beat my Body black and blue?
A70803I had planted thee a noble Vine, wholly a right seed; How then art thou turned into the degenerate Plant of a strange Vine unto me?
A70803If such attention was to be given to what was spoken onely by Moses to all the People, how much more to what is spoken by Jesus Christ?
A70803If we can not well abstain from conversing with the Occasions, how much less from the Act of a pleasant evil?
A70803If''t is our Duty to abstain from all Appearance of Evil, how much more is it our Duty, to abstain from all evil?
A70803Is God''s permitting them to be prosperous, or to sin on with great Impunity, any Argument that he approves them?
A70803Is it not that they prefer the gratification of the Ear to the Rectification of the Heart?
A70803Is it onely in the negative, That we refuse not him that speaketh?
A70803Is not God the same Jehova to Them and Vs?
A70803Jews, upon whom he had bestow''d the first- fruits of his Preaching, and to whom he had offer''d the first Refusal of his Favours?
A70803Know we not that Christ is in us by such Evidences as These?
A70803Know we not that Christ is in us, by the Presence of his Spirit?
A70803Know ye not your own selves how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be Reprobates?
A70803Now can there be any thing more adviseable, than that other mens mischiefs should keep us safe?
A70803Now is not God''s Law as binding in what he bids, as in what he forbids his peculiar People?
A70803Now to live righteously what is it, but to do justice ▪ unto our Neighbours?
A70803Now what a Monster would our Church be, if every one of these Sects had the shaping of her?
A70803Or is not his peremptory Command as obliging under the Gospel, as it was under the Law?
A70803Or is the Gospel very destitute of what the world calls Wit and Eloquence?
A70803Quod minus est non potes,& quod majus est vis credam tibi?
A70803Quomodo ob Religionem Magni, quibus Magnitudo de irreligiositate provenit?
A70803Shall I exemplifie and illustrate what I say by plain Scripture on either side?
A70803Shall I make the Case clear, and undeniable by an Example?
A70803Stand farther off, come not near me, for I am holier than Thou?
A70803Such as our Sorrow for our sins past, our hatred of our selves in Remembrance of them, and our stedfast Resolutions of better life?
A70803Then what Pretense can any have,( who are not Papalins Themselves,) to dread, or hate a Communion with us?
A70803Varius Sucronensis, who does confidently affirm Aemilius Scaurus to be Guilty?
A70803Vnde?
A70803Well, ye have heard what it is not; will ye now know what it is, which God in Christ doth speak to us?
A70803What can hinder them from converting the most Inhumane Combination or our blood- thirsty Enemies, into an Excellent Security against it self?
A70803What man knows the things of a man, save the Spirit of man which is in him?
A70803What manner of men ought we to be in the future Course of our Conversation?
A70803What may probably be the reason, why men will sleep at a Sermon, a great deal sooner than at a Play?
A70803What now is the Advantage we are to make of all This?
A70803What now is the Vse we are to make of this Doctrine, or what the Inference to be drawn from this Argument?
A70803What then is to be done, or to be said in this case of our present Breaches?
A70803What then may be the reason, why they are much more attentive to the words of Men out of the Pulpit, than to the word of God out of the Pew?
A70803What, to live soberly, but to be just unto our selves?
A70803Which of the Two( ye men of Rome) think ye the worthier of your Belief?
A70803Who( says he) is there among you of tender Bowels, and Generosity?
A70803Why should we any- where go with Them, who will not go with Vs to Heaven; and hate the means of Salvation, so far forth as we injoy them?
A70803Why then saith our Apostle, Follow Peace even with All men, not excepting the Worst of all?
A70803Will any Man who is not mad, break off the finger of his Watch as an useless Thing, because he can not perceive it moving?
A70803Will any man say it was unlawfull, for the women of Israel to hold up their chins, or set one foot before another?
A70803and by such a Son too, as is God himself?
A70803and by the Power of his Word?
A70803and by the evident effects of His Operation?
A70803and his Word as authentick in these last Times, as in the First?
A70803and how many reall Patients are in all places to be met with, for one true Penitent?
A70803and how much worse would our Babel be, than That which they call The Whore of Babylon?
A70803and in what honour was it had, when but newly to be had in the Vulgar Tongues?
A70803and that the Gospel in particular is the word which God the Father hath spoken to us by God the Son?
A70803and to pass the whole Time of our sojourning here in fear?
A70803and we receive the whole benefit without the least danger of their unhappiness?
A70803and what the Lesson, which all these Scriptures are apt to teach us?
A70803because( forsooth) to the Regenerate''t is a Thing perfectly unavoidable?
A70803by thinking Salvation is to be had at a cheaper Rate, than that of following Peace and Holiness?
A70803have fallen away before our faces into the scandalous commissions of Schism and Haeresie?
A70803have turn''d apostates from the Faith which was once deliver''d unto the Saints?
A70803how apt are others to be deceiv''d who are no Prophets at all?
A70803how did her Silver become arrant Dross?
A70803how much rather when he saith to thee, wash and be clean?
A70803how nearly does it concern us, to follow them both as is here requir''d?
A70803how sedulous we are to have the matter made up?
A70803how very gladly did he descend from out the Bosom of the Father, to bid us Live?
A70803in any Time?
A70803nor onely the Persons, who are but Men, but even Government it self, which is avowedly Divine in its Institution?
A70803not onely an exceeding, but an aeternal weight of Glory?
A70803or Aemilius Scaurus rather, who does protest that he is Innocent?
A70803or at any Place?
A70803or from making our remaining and yet present Dangers become the most Instrumental to our Escape?
A70803or if not from the Act, how much less from the Habit?
A70803or that we have not any Averseness to his Person or his Words?
A70803or what excuse can be found for a Separation?
A70803to wit, impartial Obedience to the whole Law of Christ?
A70803what by Naaman the Syrian, to hear the Counsel of Elisha, a single Prophet?
A70803what more honourable, or noble, than to win a Victory over our selves?
A70803what pains were taken by the Jews, to hear the reading of the Law?
A70803what, at the best of its Consistence, but a fair Nursery of Diseases?
A70803who shall deliver me from the Body of this Death?
A70803with the Rational part in us against the Brutal?
A70888A Conscience that knows it self to be acted by certain and infallible Principles, how could it be more head- strong and confident?
A70888Again, Are there not some whole Sects of men, all whose Religion is made up of nothing but passion, rancour, and bitterness?
A70888And are they subject and accountable to God alone?
A70888And how prodigally will they empty their Bags, and bring in even their Bodkins and Thimbles, and Spoons to carry on the Cause?
A70888And if they will turn Apostates, how can they be awed back into their Faith by being told they are so?
A70888And indeed what can we imagine more odious or mischievous than a spirit of Pride, Peevishness, and Animosity adopted into the Service of God?
A70888And that which themselves imposed, What Divine Authority can it challenge, beside that of an Ordinance of Lords and Commons?
A70888And then, let any man tell me, Wherein consists the power of Princes, when it may be controlled by every Subjects opinion?
A70888And therefore I appeal to all the wise and sober world, Whether they that would make Religion ridiculous, are not infinitely so themselves?
A70888And therefore how shall that excuse, or justifie them in their Separation?
A70888And therefore if we may decline this duty only to avoid scandal, Why not any?
A70888And were it not for us, would he not perfectly forsake and abandon it?
A70888And what do they, but set up a Pope in every mans Conscience, whilst they vest it with a Power of countermanding the Decrees of Princes?
A70888And what does renouncing the Covenant concern the people?
A70888And what else do we find enforc''d and recommended in our Saviour''s Sermons, beside heights of Morality?
A70888And what is it that men set up against Morality, but a few figurative Expressions of it self, that without it are utterly insignificant?
A70888And what is this but a state of perfect Anarchy, in which every man does what is good in his own eyes?
A70888And what so glorious as to lose their lives in the Cause of God?
A70888And when men think their passions warranted by their Religion, how is it possible it should be otherwise?
A70888And whether all the Folly and Madness in the World can equal this of these scoffing Atheists?
A70888And yet, how few are they, that take upon them to judge their lawfulness?
A70888And, What instance have we, in any Nation of the World, of any Schism and Faction so unreasonably begun and continued?
A70888And, Who taught them to call our Ceremonies, Popish, Superstitious, and Antichristian?
A70888Are Governours Gods Vicegerents?
A70888Are not the rude multitude more inclined to disturb Government by Superstition than by Licentiousness?
A70888Are not these, and the like innocent Propositions( think you) mightily conducive to the peace and settlement of Common- wealths?
A70888Are not we the praying and serious People of the Nation, for whose sakes only the Lord is pleased to stay among us?
A70888Are we beholden to him barely for suffering us to live in our native Soil, and enjoy only our fundamental Priviledges?
A70888Beside, where there are divided Interests of Religion in the same Kingdom, how shall the Prince behave himself towards them?
A70888Can they prescribe Rules of Virtue and Goodness to their Subjects?
A70888Can they punish all their Criminal Actions?
A70888Do Subjects rebel against their Sovereign?
A70888Do they murder Kings?
A70888Do they separate from the Communion of the Church?
A70888Do they tye themselves by one Oath to contradict and evacuate another?
A70888For how seldom is it, that any Wars are commenced upon just and warrantable grounds?
A70888For if so, Then why are not these good people, that follow them, better informed?
A70888For if we demand, wherefore they would be born with in their Dissentions from our way of Worship?
A70888For to what purpose should they drive one from the Communion of the Church, that has already renounced it?
A70888For what power would be left to Princes, if every private mans perswasion( for that is his Conscience) may give check to their Commands?
A70888For where are described all the Rules of Justice and Honesty?
A70888For, What is there in Christianity of greater importance, than the vertues of meekness, peaceableness, and humility?
A70888Have they a power of deciding all Controversies?
A70888How dare they commence a Suit at Law, without Warranty from Scripture?
A70888How dare they do any natural action, without particular advice and direction of Holy Writ?
A70888How dare they take any Physick, but what is prescribed in the Word of God?
A70888How do such men hug and nurse their dear scruple?
A70888How eagerly will they flow into their Party in spight of all the Power and Opposition of their Governours?
A70888How few are there of the Divine Laws more severe and peremptory, than those that command Obedience to Authority?
A70888How few are they, who have wisdom enough to keep their zeal clean from these sowre and crabbed mixtures?
A70888How happy would the world be, if wise men were but wise enough to be instructed by the Mistress of Fools?
A70888How hussingly will they assert, that the Notion of an Immaterial Substance implies a Contradiction, for no other reason, than because it does?
A70888How much severe Study and Contemplation is required to a Competent Knowledge of these things?
A70888How should offenders be reclaim''d, by being condemn''d to what they chuse?
A70888How should they be scared by threatnings, that they neither fear nor believe?
A70888If in the primitive Ages of Christianity, why then, where did our Saviour appoint the Love- Feasts?
A70888If my Conscience be really weak and tender, What can become it more than humble obedience and submission to Authority?
A70888Is not the right practice of Moral Duties as necessary a part of Religion, as any outward Form of Worship in the World?
A70888Is this all the kindness( say they) he can afford the Godly, not to persecute them by Law and force to their utter ruine?
A70888Is this all the reward and encouragement we deserve?
A70888Let them tell me, What Precept or Example they have in the Holy Scriptures for singing Psalms in Meeter?
A70888Now is there not likely to be untoward doings, when two Supreme Powers thus clash and contradict each other?
A70888Now to what purpose should he entrust them with a Commission to govern his Church, when he knew they would labour its utter ruine and destruction?
A70888Now what a reproach to the Gospel is this, that it should be made the only Plea for Sedition?
A70888Now with what a shameless Brow do these men prevaricate with publick Authority?
A70888Secondly, How came the people to be scandalized?
A70888The Civil Magistrate may determine new Instances of Virtue; how much more new Circumstances of Worship?
A70888This cancels and dispenses with all the obligations of sobriety: And what has prudence to do with Religion?
A70888To what purpose should they deny him the Instruments and Ministries of Religion, that cares not for them?
A70888To what purpose should they turn him out of their Society, that has already prevented them by forsaking it?
A70888What a perverse folly is it to imagine, That nothing but opposition to Government can secure our liberty?
A70888What clearer evidence can we possibly have, That it is not Conscience, but humour and peevishness that dictates their scruples?
A70888What does St. Paul discourse of to Felix but moral matters, Righteousness, and Temperance, and Iudgment to come?
A70888What does the Scripture mean when it styles our Saviour King of Kings, and makes Princes his Vicegerents here on earth?
A70888What has this to do with their private Meetings and Conventicles, against the Commands of publick Authority?
A70888What is it to teach the Commandments of men for Doctrines, but to teach those things to be the Law of God that are not so?
A70888What other inducement have they to dislike the Churches Constitutions, but meerly the example of their Leaders?
A70888What reason can the Wit of man assign to restrain it from one, that will not much more restrain it from both?
A70888What strange effects are these of a diffident and timorous Conscience?
A70888What then is to be done in this case?
A70888What will ye?
A70888Where are decided all Controversies of Right and Wrong?
A70888Where are determined all doubts and questions of Conscience?
A70888Where are recorded all the Laws of Government and Policy?
A70888Where has he commanded the observations of Lent and Easter?
A70888Where has he instituted the Kiss of Charity?
A70888Where has our Saviour or his Apostles enjoyn''d a Directory for publick Worship?
A70888Where the Lords- Day Sabbath?
A70888Whether to consute it with Raillery and Bold Iests, be not as void of Wit as Reason?
A70888Who buzzed their scruples, and jealousies into their heads?
A70888Why do not these men require from the Scriptures express Commands for every Action they do in common life?
A70888Why do they connive at their pride and presumption?
A70888Why do they not instruct them in the truth, and disabuse them out of their false and absurd conceits?
A70888Why not all?
A70888Why should they not be as complete a System of Ethicks, as they are a Canon of Worship?
A70888Will not the most sacred Bonds and Compacts leave them in as insecure a condition as they found them in?
A70888and what Command for that significant Ceremony of wearing sack- cloth and ashes, in token of Humiliation?
A70888and what can follow, but perfect disorder and confusion, when every man will be governed by nothing but his own conceits?
A70888and, where all their other Commemorative Festivals?
A70888by whom were they betrayed, and affrighted into their mistakes?
A70888shall I come unto you with a rod, or in love, and in the spirit of meekness?
A70888who I say, that loves and adores the Spirit of true Religion, can forbear to be sharp and severe to such thick and fulsom abuses?
A4004027. a Nullo verò facto verbo, nulla concione, nulla lege concitatam nocturaam Seditionem quis audivit?
A40040And how many of our Presbyterians have declared their perpetual adhearing to their Covenant against our present Church- government?
A40040And if they positively affirm it on their part, may not we make a question of it on ours?
A40040And is not he a very thankful man, that in requital of the Kings mercy, hath since that preach''d seditiously?
A40040And is not this a good way to plead for Zion?
A40040And is nothing for the glory of God but Presbytery?
A40040And must no body be judge of these things but themselves?
A40040And our Reverend Clergy outed by a swarm of Enthusiastick Schismaticks?
A40040And was not the King highly beholden to these his gude Subjects?
A40040And was not this a fit Sermon to be preacht just the day before the Treaty at Uxbridge, and then to be printed too by the Presbyterian Authority?
A40040And were not these sweet- souls to preach Peace and Repentance?
A40040And what will not these men do for their own advantage?
A40040And what''s the difference( pray) whether they fall, By the Popes Bull, or your Oxe- General?
A40040And who must be the Masters of the Game, but a crew of domineering Zealots thrust up into a Rebellious Authority?
A40040And who must this boaster be, but the furious John Vicars?
A40040Are not Kings Objects of Ministerial admonition?
A40040Are not these precious souls to promote the Holy League, or to put forward the cause of Muntzer, or John a Leyden?
A40040But if this summe was great, what was the Decimation, Sequestration, and such like knacks of procuring monyes?
A40040But is it any honour to the Independent Engagement against King,& c. nay, the Covenant too; because some great Presbyterians took it?
A40040But it may be said, To what purpose is all this, since they themselves do not deny it, and all the world knows it?
A40040But must the Scotch Covenanters be only guilty in affronting their King?
A40040But what care the Commons for this?
A40040But what did the Brethren do?
A40040But who then?
A40040But will this subordinate it to the Covenant?
A40040But, How furiously doth John Knox, his Countrey- man, incite the people to Rebellion?
A40040Calamy, the famous hinter of Aldermanbury, London?
A40040Calling his Majesty( through his Declarations) scandalous, impious, false, wicked, tyrannical, and what not?
A40040Can any man desire the Society of more peaceable Brethren?
A40040Could not they Ruine the Common- Prayer- Book against the Kings command?
A40040Could not they call a Pye- bald Assembly against his command?
A40040Could not they devide their Lands amongst themselves against the Kings command?
A40040Could these men desire peace, that thus countenanced men to rail against their betters, with whom they were to Treat?
A40040Could they not Murther and begger an Archbishop, and others of the Orthodox, and Loyal Clergy, against his command?
A40040Could they not commit Sacriledge against his command?
A40040Could they not destroy Cathedrals against his command?
A40040Could they not make Perjury lawful against his command?
A40040Could they not make Schismatical Presbyterian Ordinations against his command?
A40040Could they not make Treason a Rule of Christianity against his command?
A40040Could they not make what they pleased to be Idolatry and Superstition, against his command?
A40040Could they not set up Classical, Provincial, and National Assemblies, against his command?
A40040Could they not set up the Directory against his command?
A40040Could they not swear a wicked Covenant against his command?
A40040Could they not turn the Kings Loyal Subjects, out of both the Universities, against his command?
A40040Dimmi, che pensi far?
A40040Do not Royal Acts fall under the consideration of Casuists, resolving Conscience?
A40040Dost thou not know, that I sleep only to pleasure Mecaenas?
A40040Doth not the last clause speak little Crofton a pert blade?
A40040First, Whether he doth approve of Cook''s Appeal, or Vindication of the King''s Tryal?
A40040For instantly they fell upon grievances, abuses in Religion, violation of laws, liberties, and what not?
A40040For, Could not they null Episcopacy against the Kings command?
A40040For, as this old jugler, had impudently quiped the Reverend Church of England, with, what command, or example, have you for kneeling at the Communion?
A40040Hathill, Gordon, Spotswood, and many other persons of quality by them murdered, be avenged?
A40040How could we intend any harm against him, since we all took the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy?
A40040How earnestly doth e Boniface dehort King Aethelbold from acting Sacriledge?
A40040How farr the Royal Power extended?
A40040How farr the Royal Power extended?
A40040How hath learning been out- vapoured by ignorance?
A40040How highly did God punish those who regarded not his Temple, every man running unto his own House?
A40040How lamentably do the two old Fathers c Gregory Nazianzen, and d Theodoret, complain of the violation of Churches, and Church- plate and Treasure?
A40040How many famous Divines were sequestred and thrust from their Livings in these unnatural Wars?
A40040How many several sorts have you received Of things call''d Truths, upon your backs laid on Like Saddles for themselves to ride upon?
A40040How secretly have I stoln from my wife at midnight, to read upon it?
A40040How to that Heaven did this Pilot Steer''Twixt th''Independent, and the Presbyter, Plac''d in the Confines of two shipwracks?
A40040How was the Church in Sudly Castle at the beginning of these Wars, profaned?
A40040How were the Clergy nick- named with the title of Hirelings; Humane Learning as Heathenish; and Scholars as professing enmity against the Gospel?
A40040If he had been kill''d in an Action of Warr before, should the Souldier, or he who gave the Souldier Commission, have answer''d for his life?
A40040If the King be such a wicked man as these Brethren make of him, what must then be done with him?
A40040If the Thirty nine Articles, why do they not subscribe them?
A40040If they look upon me as an hot- headed Rayler, for calling them Rebels and Traytors( and what can be more true?)
A40040In which they might be ask''d, What they would do with the Queen?
A40040Incenderunt sanctua ium Dei, polluerum Tabernaculum ejus?
A40040Is it not an hard case, that none but these blood- shot eyes can discern the Pattern in the Mount?
A40040Is not this a pretty reflection, fitting to prompt a Rumper, to do what he will against a King?
A40040Is not this a very gratious Petition and Condescention?
A40040Is not this fit stuff from the jaws of an hot- headed Covenanter?
A40040Is not this well applyed?
A40040Many men through the hatred of some other person, by way of Revenge,( and what more sweet, and inticing?)
A40040Mr. Samuel Rutherford?
A40040Must his Majesty, or any of his true Subjects, be tryed for their lives, and martyred?
A40040Nay, could they not do any thing, but make a man a woman, and a woman a man?
A40040Nor is it the Gentry alone that suffer, but, how also have our Princes been not onely abused, but murthered?
A40040Nothing good but the Covenant?
A40040O the Obedience and Charity of a Covenanter?
A40040Or do they think it fitting or lawful, to rebell again, and destroy so many families for the rooting out of our Bishops?
A40040Or rather to make it come after the Kings interest?
A40040Or will he make a little scribble- scrabble of a few perjured Rebels to be the Law of the Land?
A40040Or, could no man, that was Godly, desire these things?
A40040Quid verba audiam, cum Facta videam?
A40040Quis homo est tanta confidentia, qui sacerdotem audeat violare?
A40040Since all the World is madd why should not I?
A40040Taxing him with an intention towards Popery; O implacable Malice?
A40040Tell me, what mean you now?
A40040Than this what could be more plain and authentick?
A40040Than this, what more implacable, destructive, and abominable?
A40040To conclude, If all things according to the Poets grow worse& worse; to what stupendious wickedness will the Presbyterians come?
A40040Vain foolish People, how are you deceived?
A40040Voyez vous ce saincte Nitouche, Ce juge à quo, cet homme froit?
A40040Was is convenient to dedicate such stuff as this to Almighty God?
A40040Was not this spoke in very good time?
A40040We must be angry; Who can choose but frown, When Traytors thrive by a Rebellious Town?
A40040What are the power, priviledges of Parliament, and Rights and Liberty of Subject?
A40040What bells ringing?
A40040What bonefires?
A40040What disgrace cast upon the decent Habits of Church and University?
A40040What dissolute proceedings have we here?
A40040What imperious and wicked Propositions sent they continually to him upon such debates?
A40040What punishment do these Boute- feus deserve for throwing such false and wicked slanders and reproaches upon a just and good King?
A40040What reason have we to believe their Moderation to be reall?
A40040What strange presumptuous disobedience?
A40040What the Presbyterian Imposers and Framers here mean, by the Doctrine of the Church of England?
A40040What they mean by Popery?
A40040What they meant by Popish Innovations within this Realm?
A40040What unheard fury void of awe or fear, With monstrous unexampled insolence?
A40040What unseemly Titles given to Organs, as Bag- pipes; and what irreverent names to Churches, as Steeple- houses?
A40040What yelling and roaring in the streets?
A40040Whereas ever now and anon, we are alarm''d with some Presbyterian Rebellion or other?
A40040Whether Kings might be censured for abusing the same, and depos''d by the Estates of the Kingdom?
A40040Whether Kings might be censured for abusing their Power; and deposed by the Estates of the Kingdom?
A40040Whether the Election or Succession of Kings, were the better Form of Government?
A40040Whether the Election or Succession of Kings, were the better form of Government?
A40040Whether those who took the Covenant, and there sware to extirpate all Schism, do not thereby engage to be( like Hoyle) their own Executioners?
A40040Whether( supposing them to be Supreme) they would allow the same Priviledge to the Episcopal Party?
A40040Why did they Commissionate so many thousand men, who by accident of Warr had the power, though not the Chance, to kill him?
A40040Why did they in 1642, 1643,& c. preach against, oppose, and deny such liberty to be given to the Episcopal and Royall Clergy?
A40040Why the Non- conformists; and only the Non- conformists, did oppose, fight, and rebel against the King?
A40040Why, since the Reformation, None of the Reformed Episcopal perswasion, have in Arms, Rebelled against their Soveraigns?
A40040Will any man quit the Treasons of Zedechias, for saying, that he was sworn Physitian to the Emperour?
A40040With what face they can desire or demand it, from the Superiours now in being, to whom they will not grant the like favours?
A40040Would any man call this a fair and famous History?
A40040Would not a man think King Charles the I by these Characters, to be a stranger Monster than ever Aldrovandus heard of?
A40040Would not the Presbyterians think much, if one should now retort?
A40040Would not this man be a fit Chaplain to an Army of Cannabals, whose delight is to devoure one another?
A40040Would the Brethren wish this King upon the Scaffold too, provided, that would free them from our Episcopacy?
A40040Yet, what need they care, whether the King make Bishops or no?
A40040an nesciebas me soli Mccaenati dormire?
A40040for Lord Bishops?
A40040for a penned Liturgy?
A40040for his good opinion of, and wishes for him, when in his Sermon at Glascow he could dapperly pray to God, To take away the Kings Idolatry?
A40040for wearing a Surplice,& c?
A40040hath not the Peers brought themselves unto a fine pass?
A40040how are Neutralists and Malignants spared?
A40040how would it puzzle the tender- hearted souls to decide the grand controversies, which ears were longest, or, which animal best conditioned?
A40040how zealously would the sister- hood meditate on the Temple- Barre Off- spring of Lay- Elders?
A40040if any thing else, why do they not mention it, that men might know what they swear?
A40040nay where your Meeter- Psalms?
A40040nunc exclamabimus, Quantum indignatus est inimicus in Sancto?
A40040or pardon Jaques Clement, Jean Chastel, or Francis Ravaillac, if they should say, Their Religion obliged them to obedience?
A40040vorrai le mani Del civil sangue tu dunque bruttarte?
A40040what snarling would there be at Christ- Church in London, and the lecturing junctos?
A40040where your Steeple- houses?
A40040which they had so long pretended to fight for: What punishment might poor people expect for presuming to pry into such Great- mens Errors?
A40040your Infant- sprinklings?
A40040your National- Church?
A40040your Tithes, and Mortuaries?
A40040your observing a weekly Sabbath?
A40040your two Sacraments?
A40040— Is not the world well mended, when Episcopacy must be call''d Faction and Schism; and Presbytery only held to be Catholick?
A40040— Is this fit to be Printed for the information of the people?
A40040— Our Cathedrals?
A40040— Quid enim magis esse profanum, Aut mage turpe potest; quàm sacris ludere pactis, Vincláque divini violare sacerrima juris?
A04250& c. For will any man, except he bee out of his wits, affirme these things to haue any life or soule?
A04250A little after, Haue not wee power to eate?
A04250Againe, wherefore did his Holines aduise himselfe, to censure the decree of the Court of Parliament in Paris against Iohn Chastell?
A04250Am I not by his prayses proclaimed a Tyrant, as it were inebriated with blood of the Saints, and a famous Enginer of torments for my Catholikes?
A04250And how can he, that may be infected with damnable heresie( when himselfe is not alwaies free from heresie) be a iudge of heresie in a King?
A04250And how can the Pope be President in a Council, where himselfe is the partie impleaded?
A04250And to be short, what reason, what equity will beare the children to be punished for the fathers debilitie?
A04250And to giue a little touch vnto matters at home; doth not his Holinesse vnderstand right well the weakenesse of Papists in my Kingdome?
A04250And what may this meaning be, but in plaine tearmes and broad speach, to cal me vsurper and vnlawfull King?
A04250And what needed such terrifying of the Church with vglinesse of schisme, whereof there is neither colourable shew, nor possibility?
A04250And what shall we call this way of depriuation, but spoyling a naked man of his garments, and killing a man alreadie dead?
A04250And what was the issue of the said imputation?
A04250And what would they haue done, if the said Buls had imported sentence of deposition against King Charles?
A04250And who were they but Ecclesiasticall persons?
A04250And will his Holinesse hold them schismatikes, that dissent from his opinion and iudgement in a subiect or cause esteemed problematicall?
A04250Are such prankes to be played by the Pontificiall Bishop?
A04250As for example, to say in forme of question, Whether is there but one God?
A04250As if it should be said, Would they not be stript naked by an other?
A04250But in this example, where is there so much as one word of the Pope, or the deposing of Kings?
A04250But may not his Quoniam, be as fitly applyed to any contagious& inueterate vice of the minde beside heresie?
A04250But shall wee now take some viewe, of the L. Cardinals excuse for this exemplarie fact?
A04250But wherefore?
A04250But whether a King be deposed by that man the Pope, or by that Pope the man, is it not all one?
A04250But who doth not know that a King deposed is no longer King?
A04250But who seeth in all this any sentence of deposition from the Imperial dignity?
A04250But why do I speake so much in the behalfe of the French Protestants?
A04250But with what face can his Lordship brag, that he preuailed with Pope Clement for the Kings absolution?
A04250Did he not yeild this reason?
A04250Doth not his Holinesse neuerthelesse animate my Papists to rebellion, and forbid my Papists to take the oath of allegiance?
A04250Doth not some part of the Spanish Kings greatnesse, consist in creating of his Great?
A04250Doth she, notwithstanding her triumph in the cause, forbeare to participate with all her neighbors in the same Sacraments?
A04250Ego verò haec Dominis meis loquens, quid sum nisi pul vis& vermis?
A04250Falls a priuate person?
A04250Fals a King?
A04250For can any man be so blind and ignorant in the sacred History, to beleeue the Prophets of Israel established, or sacred the Kings of Syria?
A04250For how could Rehoboam, before he was made King, be depriued of the Kingdome?
A04250For how doth all this touch or come neere the question?
A04250For in hereditarie Kingdoms, who is the Kings lawfull successor, but his sonne?
A04250For may not Prelates be obeyed and honoured, without Kings be deposed?
A04250For what cause?
A04250For what colour of reason can be giuen, for making the Pope Lord of the whole, and not of the parts?
A04250For what purpose?
A04250Had it not beene a trimme deuice in their times, to say, that as Esay and as Daniel they might haue sunke into heresie, but not as Prophets?
A04250Hath a King millions of subiects?
A04250Hath a priuate person a trayne of seruants?
A04250Hath not his Lordship now graced me with goodly testimonialls of prayse and commendation?
A04250Hath shee now lesse beautie, lesse glory, lesse peace and prosperitie, since she lately fell to bicker and contend with the Pope?
A04250Haue not Popes forged a donation of Constantine, of purpose to blot out all memory of Pepins and Charlemaignes donation?
A04250Haue they not by their infinite exactions, robbed and scoured the Kingdome of all their treasure?
A04250Haue they not vexed and troubled the State?
A04250How many massacres, how many desolations of cities and townes, how many bloody battels ensued thereupon?
A04250How so?
A04250How then?
A04250If Prelates preach the doctrine of the Gospell, will they in the pulpit stirre vp subiects to rebell against Kings?
A04250In temporall matters, how can one be Soveraigne, that may be fleeced of all his temporalties by any superiour power?
A04250In what age beganne the Pope to practise this power?
A04250Iohn, and Henry III?
A04250Is it credible, that he hath giuen them a sword to be kept in the scabbard, without drawing once in a thousand yeeres?
A04250Is it not also the generall beleefe of that Order, that Clerics are exempted from the condition of Subiects to the King?
A04250Is it not possible, that calumniations whereby a credulous Pope hath beene seduced, may in like manner deceiue some great part of a credulous people?
A04250Is it not possible, that his Holinesse will not rest in the remonstrances of the French,& will yet further pursue his cause?
A04250Is it possible that his Lordship can speake and vtter these words according to the inward perswasion of his heart?
A04250Is it possible, that in the very heart and head Citie of France, a spirit& tongue so licentious can be brooked?
A04250Is not a sword also without life and soule?
A04250Is this an act of Holinesse, to set a Kingdome on fire by the flaming brands of sedition?
A04250Let her be plumed and bereft of her feathers; what owle, what iacke- daw more ridiculous, more without all pleasant fashion?
A04250Might not euen the meanest of the people vse the same tenour of words, and say?
A04250Nay; is not here offered vnto me a dart out of the L. Cardinals armorie, to cast at himselfe?
A04250Of Holland, Zeland, and Friseland, what need I speake?
A04250Or why shall it be counted follie, to leaue a sword in the hand of a mad Bedlam?
A04250Paul said to the Corinthians, Know ye not that we shall iudge the Angels?
A04250Shall I bee drag''d to prison or to death?
A04250Shall a stranger be preferred by the Pope?
A04250Shall not a sinner be quitted of his faults, except his Pastor turne robber, and one that goeth about to get a booty?
A04250Shall not the people?
A04250Shall the sonne himselfe?
A04250The Greek Emperour was excommunicated by Pope Symmachus: who knowes whether that be true or forged?
A04250To what end all this?
A04250To what purpose is this example?
A04250True it is, the Imperiall Crowne was then set on Charlemaynes head by Leo the Pope: did Leo therefore giue him the Empire?
A04250Very good: I demand then vpon the matter, wherefore the Pope doth not instruct and reforme the man?
A04250Was not Guignard a Iesuit?
A04250Was not Iohn Chastel brought vp in the same schoole?
A04250Was not he that killed the forenamed King, was not he one of the Clergie?
A04250Were not the Kings of France, driuen to stoppe their violent courses by the pragmaticall sanction?
A04250Were they not a kind of naked and bare people, of small value, before God lighted the torch of the Gospel, and aduanced it in those Nations?
A04250What a shame, what a reproach is this?
A04250What fowle is more beautifull then the peacocke?
A04250What hee neuer conferred, by what right or power can hee claime to take away?
A04250What is the difference between these two?
A04250What need they to conceale their names in that regard?
A04250What need they to disclaime the credit of such a worthy act?
A04250What needes any man to be instructed in this doctrine?
A04250What was the cause?
A04250What were the heads, the chiefe promoters, the complices of the powder- conspiracie in my Kingdom?
A04250What, did the French in those dayes beleeue, the Church was then swallowed vp, and no where visible or extant in the world?
A04250What, for kindling coales of questions and controuersies about Religion?
A04250What, shall so great blasphemy( as it were) of the Kings freehold, be powred forth in so honourable an assembly, without punishment or fyne?
A04250What?
A04250What?
A04250When beganne this Papall power?
A04250Wherefore did not his Holinesse publish some Lawe or Pontificiall decree, to prouide for the securitie of Kings in time to come?
A04250Who knowes not how great an offence, how heinous a crime it is to quarter, not Iesus Christs coat, but his body, which is the Church?
A04250Who lets, what hinders this place from fitting the Pope?
A04250Who seeth not here how great indignitie is offered to me a Christian King?
A04250Who seeth not here into what pickle the French cause is brought by this meanes?
A04250Who shall succeed in the deposed Kings place?
A04250Why so?
A04250Wil he yet hold the sterne of his Royall estate?
A04250Will they keepe their Soueraigntie in safetie for euer?
A04250declared in his proud letters all those to be heretickes, that dare vndertake to affirme, the collating of Prebends appertaineth to the King?
A04250doth she liue in schisme with all the rest of the Romane Church?
A04250for making him Lord of the forrest in grosse, and not of the trees in parcell?
A04250for making him Lord of the whole house, and not of the parlour or the dining chamber?
A04250haue they not whetted the sonnes of Lewis the Courteous against their owne Father, whose life was a pattern and example of innocencie?
A04250how full of scandall?
A04250how is it in these daies filthily prophaned?
A04250how is it now derided and scoffed?
A04250how long, the Maiestie of God in their person and Royall Maiestie to bee so notoriously vilified, so dishonourably trampled vnder foote?
A04250how much are you disparaged?
A04250how much more then the things that pertaine vnto this life?
A04250in how hard, in how miserable a state doe they stand?
A04250is a King deposed?
A04250is he not deposed?
A04250or wherefore the man doth not require the Popes instructions?
A04250or, Whether is man a creature indued with reason?
A04250should shee not be in a very wise and warme taking?
A04250since she hath plumed and shaked his Temporall dominion?
A04250since shee hath wrung out of the Popes hand, the one of his two swords?
A04250so good a King and Father of his Countrey, was put downe by Iulius the II?
A04250to wit, because he had beene armed with instruction of musket proofe in the case, before he made passage ouer from the Low Countries?
A04250were they not Ecclesiastics?
A04250what can this be else, but heaping of robbery vpon fraud, and impiety vpon robbery?
A04250what infamous act had they done?
A04250what infernall gulph hath disgorged this law out of the darkest and obscurest dennes?
A04250what prophane and irreligious crime had they committed?
A04250what, without any contradiction for the Kings right, and on the Kings behalfe?
A04250wherefore doe you incraach and intrude vpon an others limits?
A04250wherefore shal the sacred heads of Kings be more churlishly, vnciuilly, and rigorously handled, then the hoods of the meanest people?
A04250wherefore takes he more vpon him ouer Kings, then ouer priuate persons?
A87137( Point de Novelle,) or where are we to find it?
A87137Alasse, mine are nothing( Quis leget haec?
A87137And what apparent cause is there of such confidence?
A87137And what was that?
A87137And where are these same Miracles?
A87137And yet let me comfort my self, Whose are better?
A87137Are these still two distinct things, or may we hence, at least, compute them to be one and the same?
A87137Are these such whereof the things unto which they relate may be interpretors?
A87137Are they but once mentioned, and that is in a Parenthesis?
A87137But how?
A87137But if so, then how comes it to pass that our Ancestors have been so solicitous, least Judicature should fail in Israel?
A87137But if thus she have been, and be, is it not a fine way of cure to give us an example of the disease for the remedy?
A87137But of what security, that of his Person, or of his Empire, or of both?
A87137But they may say granting you this use of speech in relation unto Laws, what have you of this kind for Elections?
A87137Could truth desire greater advantage than redounds from such opposition?
A87137Did you ever see such a Bestia?
A87137Do we take, or are we taken?
A87137Doth not his Book deserve to be guilded and carry''d in Statesmens pockets?
A87137Down go the pots, and up go their heels: what is this?
A87137Fair, and softly was not all this after Lysander, and the Spoils of Athens and so ruin''d Lacedemon?
A87137First, the old, whether it agreed with the Athenian people, or not?
A87137For had there been formerly no Rotation in Athens, how should there have been Men of valour and conduct to lye by the walls?
A87137For if Riches and Freedome be the end of Government; and these men propose nothing but slavery, beggary and Turcisme, what need more words?
A87137Gentlemen, What do you say?
A87137Have I not also discovered already, the Original right of Ordination, whether in Civil, or religious Orders?
A87137Have Ragusa, or San Marino been conquer''d by the Arms of any Monarch?
A87137Have done I say; will you vy that green in your cheeks with the purple of the State?
A87137How may we make this agree with that other place?
A87137How should the people give their consent but by their suffrage?
A87137How then should the Six circumvent them?
A87137How well would this have sounded in Aegypt, and how ill in Athens?
A87137I grant Divines, that Ordination by this time was wholly in the Presbytery, what say they then unto the distinction of Ordination and Election?
A87137If Wallesteine had lived, what had become of his Master?
A87137If a Gentleman should do thus, what would they say?
A87137If a river have but one naturall bed or channel, what dam is made in it by this Agrarian?
A87137If it be reply''d that the people were not armed; by whom did the Barons make War with the Kings?
A87137If that they were not trusted with a Vote; what was that of the House of Commons?
A87137If they say no; Who in this place but the Presbytery elected?
A87137If they say yes; Why then might they not have been so before?
A87137If three years be too short a Term for this purpose, what was three moneths?
A87137If thus she have not been, nor be, what hath he read of the Princes of the bloud in former times, or heard of late from them?
A87137In whom should there be greater Fear of God, then in such as carry their lives in their hands?
A87137Is a word like a Woman that being taken with a Metaphor, it can never be restored unto the Original Virtue?
A87137Is it not a fine piece of folly for private men sitting in their Cabinets to Rack their brains about Models of Government?
A87137Is that of the Sun, of the Stars, of a River, a perpetual Motion?
A87137Is there a stronger Argument that such a Government is not Seditious?
A87137It is said in Scripture, thy Word is sweet as honey; Amounts that but to this, because honey is sweet, therefore the Word of God is sweet?
A87137May we not say of this, it is for the tryal of our Noses, whether they will serve us to discover that a Conclusion should have some Premisses?
A87137Nay, is not he worse then an infidel that provideth not for his own family?
A87137Now if these words be sometimes otherwise taken, what words be there in any language that are not often used improperly?
A87137Now what can be clearer than that by this place the Clergy and the People had hitherto right to elect the Pope?
A87137ONe would think the Guascon had done well, Is he satisfied?
A87137Or are they but once numbred, and that is in a Parenthesis?
A87137Or if Lillies and Roses have been almost as often said of Ladies Cheeks, must we understand them no otherwise when we are speaking of Gardens?
A87137Or unto what things can they relate but the Institution of the Sanhedrim by Moses?
A87137Or what is the reason why the Paisant in France is base, and the lower People in England of an high courage?
A87137Or, what were ill enough to be said?
A87137Or, why else should I in speaking of Oceana( where Propriety is taken as it was found, and not stirred an hair) think on the promise to Abraham?
A87137Riddle me, Riddle me, what is this?
A87137Say, is a Commonwealth to be govern''d in the word of a Priest or a Pharisee, or by the Vote of the People, and the Interest of Mankind?
A87137Speak out, is it the word of God, or the knavery and nonsense of such Preachers that ought to Govern?
A87137That of Timothy, rather than that of Matthias?
A87137The Law of Moses allow''d ▪ the first- born but a double portion: was his an extravagant spirit?
A87137The opinions of Grotius( saies he) can not oblige us beyond the reasons whereon they are founded; and what are those?
A87137The power of Greece thus improved, and the desire of money with all, their Revenues( in what?
A87137There passeth not a Moneth but there die Rogues at Tiburn, is the Government therefore seditious?
A87137Therefore pray they must not, or Divines are lost; But how will they silence them?
A87137These me thinks are strange arguments; the Gospel came to us from Rome, is Rome therefore the Metropolis of England?
A87137To the question then, how such Councils as I have proposed would do with a Prince?
A87137To which I answer by a like question, What security will he give me that the People of any Commonwealth shall not cast themselves into the Sea?
A87137WHat pleaseth the Prince( saith Justinian) hath the force of a Law, seeing the people in his Creation have devolved their whole power upon his person?
A87137WHether Humane Prudence be not a Creature of God, and to what end God made this Creature?
A87137WHether there be any thing in this Fabrick or Model, that is contradictory unto it Self, unto Reason, or unto Truth?
A87137Was it not a great grievance in Lacedemon, tro, that they had no such Logick nor Logician?
A87137Well; but where is the Patient then?
A87137What conclusion would you expect he should infer from hence?
A87137What do reverend Divines mean to cry up this Infidel?
A87137What else is the meaning of these words, or of this proceeding of his?
A87137What is said, every body knew before; this is not said ▪ who knowes it?
A87137What is the Method of our Aesculapius?
A87137What necessity is there even in the places alleadged why the word Chirotonia should be understood in the sense imposed?
A87137What need we then proceed any farther, while he having no where disproved the ballance in these words, gives the whole cause?
A87137What other construction can be made of these words?
A87137What therefore hath the Hierarchy, and the Presbytery for their opinion that the Sanhedrin was instituted by the Chirothesia, or Imposition of Hands?
A87137What word in any Language is not sometimes nay frequently used in some other than the proper sense?
A87137Where, or how came he to know this?
A87137Whether Courses or Rotation be necessary unto a well- ordered Common- wealth?
A87137Whether God did not approve of the Advice of Jethro, in the Fabrick of the Common wealth of Israel?
A87137Whether Jethro were not an Heathen?
A87137Whether Monarchy comming up to the perfection of the kind, come not short of the perfection of Government and have some flaw in it?
A87137Whether Monarchy comming up to the perfection of the kind, come not short of the perfection of Government, and have some flaw in it?
A87137Whether Prudence be well distinguisht into Antient and Modern?
A87137Whether Riches and Poverty( more or lesse) do not introduce Command or Obedience( more or lesse) as well in a Publick, as in a Private Estate?
A87137Whether a Commonwealth comming up to the perfection of the kind, come not up to the perfection of Government, and have no flaw in it?
A87137Whether a Commonwealth that was not first broken by her self, were ever conquer''d by any Monarch?
A87137Whether a Commonwealth that was not first broken by her self, were ever conquer''d by the Arms of any Monarch?
A87137Whether courses or Rotation be necessary unto a well Order''d Commonwealth?
A87137Whether is a government of Laws less natural then a government of Men?
A87137Whether the Genius of the People of Oceana, have been of late years, or be devoted, or addicted unto the Nobility and the Clergy, as in former times?
A87137Whether the Senatusconsulta or Decrees of the Roman Senate had the power of Laws?
A87137Whether the Senatusconsulta or decrees of the Roman Senate had the power of Laws?
A87137Whether the Ten Commandements proposed by God or Moses, were voted by the people of Israel?
A87137Whether the ballance of Dominion in Land be the Natural cause of Empire?
A87137Whether they had been dutifull unto their Parents?
A87137Who made humane prudence?
A87137Why is not Election of Officers in the Church as well a political thing, as election of Officers in the State?
A87137Why saies Doctor Hamond, it is plain that the Spirit of Prophesie elected?
A87137With what elegance, if this be forbidden, can any man write or speak?
A87137Would you have any more?
A87137and if Rotation thenceforth should have ceased, how could those men of valour and conduct have done other than lye by the walls?
A87137and whence came it?
A87137and why may not this be as lawfully performed by the Chirotonia in the one, as in the other?
A87137born Arms for the Common- wealth?
A87137for who seeth not that to introduce the Chirothesia as a standing Ordinance, had been to bar the people of this power?
A87137if these be not Monarchies by Nobility, what do we mean by that thing?
A87137if they be the weaker party, they are not the great ones, and if they be the stronger party, how will he reduce them?
A87137is he left unto the Civil Magistrate, while Divines derive themselves from General Ioshua and his Chirothesia?
A87137must your mother, who was never there her self, seek you in the Oven?
A87137or if they received the Scriptures, why should they choose that Ordination which would fit them worst rather that which would fit them best?
A87137or is it more natural unto a Prince to govern by Laws or by Will?
A87137or is this one regard in which it is not?
A87137or to what end was it made?
A87137or what Government is it that we are to Cure?
A87137or what difference, where they have power, can there be between the suffrage, and the power of the people?
A87137or whether it be any more possible for the Political body of a People so to do, then for the Natural body of a Godly man?
A87137or whether of these is the more noble?
A87137paid duties or taxes?
A87137what becomes of the Priest Aaron and his Lots?
A87137what more?
A87137what reason or experience doth he alledge for the proof of it?
A87137what security hath a Prince that his people will not pull him out of his Throne?
A87137which is which the most?
A87137who has taught you to cast away passion( an''t please you) like the Bran, and work up Reason as pure as the Flower of your Cake?
A87137whom should she endeavour to make greater Lovers of peace, then them who only can enslave her by force?
A87137why a Nobility or an Army; and are not the people in a Commonwealth their own Army?
A87137why among these therefore there is good cause to reckon her Immunity from seditions; Doth not our Logician repeat faithfully and dispute honestly?
A87137why in comes a Gallant with a file of Musqueteers, what saies he, are you dividing and choosing here?
A87137why should they suffer such power in new and private, as they would not endure in their old and publick Magistrates?
A87137will no less serve your turn then the whole mystery of a well order''d Commonwealth?
A5041021. have yee not knowne — have ye not understood?
A5041025. where God by his Prophet sayes, To whom will ye liken me, or shall I be equall saith the Holy One?
A5041034?
A50410Againe, have there not been some who have thought our Temples unholy, because the Common- Prayer Booke hath been read there?
A50410Againe, when one saith, I am Paul; And when another saith, I am of Apollos; Are ye not carnall?
A50410Alas, my brethren, how many such furies, rather then Preachers, have for some yeares walkt among us?
A50410All nations are less then vanity in comparison of God; to whom then will ye liken God, or what likeness will ye compare unto him?
A50410An Omnia è Missali Breviario necnon Pontificali Romano à Prelatis nostris decerpta, populoque obstrusa in Ecclesiam recipienda sint?
A50410An injury of that( hipocriticall, shall I say?
A50410And How, thinke you, do they prove it?
A50410And can I passe over this part of the Text, and not say that there have been such Prophets among us in our times?
A50410And dares he call prosperous Sedition, but a more successefull mischiefe?
A50410And doth not a wanton wit make the heart effeminate?
A50410And have not the Teachers of these strange, unchristian Doctrines, delivered them to the people in the holy stole of Prophets?
A50410And have renounced the Congregation, where part of the Service hath been tuned through an Organ?
A50410And how did hee descend?
A50410And how were they separated I pray?
A50410And is not every man finally impenitent, save those few to whom God gives repentance, freely, powerfully, effectually?
A50410And is not this, my Brethereu, our very case?
A50410And so turn the name of your Preacher and Apostle, into the name of a Schisme and side?
A50410And they, perhaps, the lesser part who are guilty of those sinnes?
A50410And what Communion hath Light with Darknesse?
A50410And what Concord hath Christ with Belial?
A50410And what Sermons have not been spiced with a a holy sedition?
A50410And what agreement hath the Temple of God with Idolls?
A50410And what are these two places?
A50410And what sinne thinke you is this sinne of Separation?
A50410And what was that Great City?
A50410And wherein, I pray, hath his ungiftedness appeared?
A50410And will you yet ask Questions?
A50410And, pray, what was that promise, and what was this power?
A50410Are all Drunkards?
A50410Are all Extortioners?
A50410Are all Fornicatours?
A50410Are all Raylers?
A50410Are not our Congregations built on the Scripture- Rock?
A50410Are they not men who doe onely professe to have the art not to heale, or close, or reconcile, but to inflame, and kindle sides?
A50410Are they not men who will stone you for your Vineyard, and then urge Scripture for it?
A50410Are ye not carnall?
A50410Articles, and confest to be Protestant by an Act of Parliament?
A50410Assembly, but a Congregation of such sinners?
A50410BUt here, perhaps, will some of you, who heare me this day, say, What''s all this to us?
A50410But are our whole Congregations composed of such men?
A50410But here may some man say to me, if they mistake this place, what''s your Interpretation of it?
A50410But how doth this prove that they are to forsake our Congregations?
A50410But how shall this be brought to pass, unless all judgments were alike clear, and unbiassed?
A50410But now will you heare my censure of this wilde Interpretation?
A50410But what if this be only a Jealousie and suspition in your Friend?
A50410But what saies the place?
A50410But what speake I to you of this Congregation of such high, schollarly dissentions?
A50410But whatever hee were, have not we in our times seene Patriarches and Prophets, as vulgar and mechanick, as unlearned and base as he?
A50410By what one Act have these many Vowes been broken?
A50410By what?
A50410Can any man repent, that is given up to a reprobate mind, and an impenitent heart?
A50410Christi Sanctorumque imagines Reformatorum Templis utili sint ornatui?
A50410Dares he arraigne a publique sinne, though never so fortunate?
A50410Dares he maintaine his Christian courage in Tyrannicall, doubtfull times?
A50410Did he forsake the Table, because a Pharisee made the Feast?
A50410Did not our Saviour Christ( and certainely his example is too great to be refused) usually converse with Publicans and sinners?
A50410Did you never converse with any woman of light behaviour?
A50410Do we preach another Gospel?
A50410Doe any of us make prayers to a stocke?
A50410Doe they see any Gods of Gold, erected in our Temples?
A50410Doe we not agree with them in all things, but where they differ from the Scripture?
A50410Doe we not beleeve in the same Iesus Christ?
A50410Doe we not confesse the same God that they doe?
A50410Doe you beleeve that your nature is corrupt?
A50410Does an Oath provoke his zeale, yet does he count lying in the godly no sin?
A50410Does he choose his Text out of the Bible, and make the Sermon out of his Fancy?
A50410Does he not flatter Vice, though he find it clothed in Purple, nor speak neglectfully of Vertue, though he finde it clothed in rags?
A50410Does he reprove Adultery, but preach up discord?
A50410Does he strive to plant the feare and love of God in his Auditory, the forgivenesse of their enemies, and pity towards the poore?
A50410Does he strive to preach downe Learning, or does he call Study a humane folly?
A50410Does hee preach charity, and banish strife from his Pulpit?
A50410Does hee startle at a dumb picture in a Church- window, and at the same time preach all good order and right Discipline out of the Church?
A50410Doth he mean that Religion which succeeded Popery at the Reformation, and hath ever since distinguisht us from the Church of Rome?
A50410Doth no ● … your own Tertullian say, Nonne& Laici Sacerdotes sumus, That any Lay- man, if he please, may be a Priest?
A50410For first, what should give them Authority to doe so?
A50410For here let me once more ask them, How was Elisha called to be a Prophet?
A50410For here, I must once more repeat my former Question, and aske by what effects, or signes of the Spirit, men shall know them to be called?
A50410For what Fellowship hath Righteousnesse with unrighteousnesse?
A50410For whereas there are among you Envyings, and Strifes, and Divisions; Are ye not carnall, and walke as men?
A50410Hath it not been the very word of God it self?
A50410Hath not a dumb Picture in the window driven some from the Church?
A50410Have not men been taught that they can not give God his due, if they give Caesar his?
A50410Have not some Pulpits been thought unsanctified, because, forsooth, the Preacher hath been ungifted?
A50410Have they not also to make things seem hideous in the State, cast them into strange, fantasticall, Chymera figures?
A50410Have they not called a most unnaturall, civill VVar, the burden of the Lord?
A50410Have they not presented strange visions to them?
A50410Have we not seene the Prophet Micah''s propheticall curse fulfilled upon this Kingdome?
A50410Here then, my Brethren, let me make my appeale to eyery one of you, who heare me this day, hath not this been our verie case?
A50410Here( as I said before) may some of the Separating party, say to me, How doth the former part of your Sermon concern us?
A50410Here, then, if I may once more take the liberty to parallel one people with another; is not this our very case?
A50410Idolatrie in a Church window, Superstition in a white Surplice, Masse in our Common- prayer Booke, and Antichrist in our Bishops?
A50410If I should aske you, from whence have sprung our present distractions?
A50410If mens vices then, and corruptions, bee not a sufficient cause to warrant a separation, what else can be?
A50410If the sinnes of a part be a just sufficient Ground to separate from the whole, Why doe not they who separate, divide and fall assunder?
A50410If you were not, why doe you raise a Sect, and Faction from him?
A50410In places, which have reduced him the second time to a Stable?
A50410In your next( what shall I call it?)
A50410Is Christ divided?
A50410Is he passionate against Superstition, but milde and calme towards Sacriledge?
A50410Is it because the persons from whom they thus separate themselves, are irreligious, wicked men?
A50410Is it because we preach in Churches?
A50410Is it the place of meeting, or Church, or the things done there, which hath made them shun our ordinary Congregations?
A50410Is it the web, or matter, or colour, or fashion of the garment, or is it the frame or forme, or indevotion of the Book which offends thee?
A50410Is not Christ our Corner Stone, and his Apostles our Foundation?
A50410Is their place of private Meetings so much the New Ierusalem, That no Drunkard, no Adulterer, nor Rayler enters there?
A50410Is''t because men of this 〈 ◊ 〉 perswasion doe sinne very grievously against 〈 ◊ 〉?
A50410Lastly, does he preach such Christian Truths for which some holy men have died, and to which he himselfe would not be affraid to fall a sacrifice?
A50410Lastly, does hee preach separation upon weake untemper''d grounds?
A50410Leonum feritas inter se non dimicat, serpentum morsus non petunt serpentes; Who ever heard of a Lyon devovred by a Lyon?
A50410Men of corrupt Mindes; Reprobate concerning the Faith?
A50410Men who are Christians onely in forme, and whose conversation carries nothing but evill example and pollution with it?
A50410Men, who like the old Pharisees, with a long prayer in their Mouth, creep into Houses, and there leade Captive silly Women?
A50410My Brethren, what shall I say to you?
A50410Nay, hath not Christ been worshipt in places yet more vile and mean?
A50410Next then, doth your friend, by Liberty, meane a Releasement from Tyranny, as Tyranny allowes men to be Subjects, but not much removed from slaves?
A50410Next then, is''t because such an Opinion is destructive of Humane Society?
A50410On the contrary, does the Preachers Sanctity and Religion consist meerly in the devout composure of his looks and carriage?
A50410Or are they onely some?
A50410Or art thou troubled because they have both beene borrowed from the Church of Rome?
A50410Or did he refuse a perfume, because a harlot powred it on his head?
A50410Or did he refuse to goe up into the Temple, because buyers and sellers were there, men who had turned it into a den of Theeves?
A50410Or doe any of us burne Incense to a Stone?
A50410Or doe they see any Images of Silver adored, and sacrificed to by our Congregations?
A50410Or doe we persecute, or force, or drive them from our Congregations?
A50410Or does labour to divide the minds, which hee should strive to reconcile?
A50410Or doubt of the certainty of their vocation?
A50410Or hope to be saved by any other Name but His?
A50410Or if there were such a thing as Prelaticall usurpation, why could not the usurpations be taken away, and Episcopacie left to stand?
A50410Or in the silent whisper of an unperceived Illumination?
A50410Or is it because there is Haeresie or Superstition mixt with our once Common Forme of prayer?
A50410Or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?
A50410Or what part hath he that believeth with an Infidell?
A50410Or who ever heard of a Serpent stung by a Serpent?
A50410Or, who are they who keep the wounds of our divided Kingdome bleeding?
A50410Otherwise, as the Question was askt of fire, Igne quid utilius?
A50410Sir, Reprobatio est tremendum Mysterium; how dare you jest upon such a Subject, at the thought of which each Christian trembles?
A50410Sir, Who was it that would have imposed a Popish Service Book upon Scotland by force of Armes?
A50410So we may say of Words, Sermone quid utilius?
A50410Soli Praelato potestas Ordinationis nec non Iurisdictionis Iure divino competat?
A50410The Uisitors will ere long enquire, whether there hath not beene a Superstitious use of Copes at Christ- Church?
A50410Then for examples in the New Testament, pray what were the Apostles?
A50410To what unweighed, aery scruples, and vanities, is he entitled?
A50410VVhy doe you call your selves by way of marke and distinction, Paulists?
A50410Verse, that he was a Herdman, and a gatherer of Sycamore fruit?
A50410Was Paul crucified for you?
A50410What bold Libell, or Pamphlet hath not for some yeares railed in a holy style?
A50410What imposition of hands went to change S. Peter from a Fisher- man into an Apostle?
A50410What more beneficiall gift of nature did God ever bestow upon us then Speech?
A50410What more usefull gift did God ever bestow upon us then Fire?
A50410Where the Scripture is most cleare, they hardly understand it; How then, should they finde out the Key to such darke prophecies as this?
A50410Whether all that our Prelates have borrowed of the Church of Rome, and imposed upon the people, ought to be still retained in the Church of England?
A50410Whether any Prelate be endued with the power of sole Ordination and Iurisdiction Iure divino?
A50410Whether any Reprobate can ever be converted or saved?
A50410Whether that faith which is grounded only upon Tradition, ought to be esteemed a Divine faith?
A50410Whether the Images of our Mediatour, and the Saints are usefull Ornaments in Protestant Churches?
A50410Whether the Nationall Covenant contradict it selfe?
A50410Whether the School- men are Competent judges in any point which concernes the Mysterie of Faith or Power of Godliness?
A50410Whether the spirit speaking in the word to the conscience of private men ought to be esteemed a private Spirit?
A50410Whether they who defend the Protestants of Ireland against the Rebells by force of Armes, are therefore to be esteemed Mahumetans?
A50410Whether they who endeavoured to impose a Popish Service- Booke upon Scotland by force of Armes, were of the Mahumetan perswasion?
A50410Which, that you may the more clearly understand, give me leave to aske you in truth what is Schisme?
A50410Who made that Court Faction, which would have miscounselled him to bring in Popery?
A50410Wil you, Sir, who have all this while thus bemoaningly pitied our divisions?
A50410Will they extend it to all sorts of persons who are such?
A50410Will you heare him in all these particulars expresse himselfe?
A50410Will you now heare their second?
A50410You talke of a Religion, in which you were borne, were you borne in a Surplice or a Cope?
A50410in a still, soft, secret, invisible perswasion of the Fancy?
A50410meerly by the secret, unknown whisper and instinct of the holy Ghost?
A50410or did Christ send to Athens for them?
A50410or discourse to you of disputes and controversies, not in the power of Scripture, Synods, or Generall Councells to decide?
A50410or speak in defence of afflicted Innocence, though over- borne by oppression?
A50410were they great Schollars?
A50410were they not Fishermen, men altogether unletter''d, men called from mending nets to preach the Gospell?
A50410what hath crumbled us asunder, and turn''d one of the purest, and most flourishing Churches of the world, into a heap of Heresies and confusion?
A50410who shall be the Judg of Controversies?
A50410why doe you talk of being Martyr''d?
A50410will some man say, why?
A33908''T is well for the Doctor''s Ancestors, he did not ask them what Right they had to be his Ancestors?
A33908And can the Doctor find in his Heart to quarrel with Mr. Hobs after all this harmony in Opinion?
A33908And can the Dr. deny these Advantages to the Usurpers upon K. Charles II?
A33908And does God put his own People upon all these intolerable Inconveniencies?
A33908And does not the Doctor say the same in other Words?
A33908And have they a Right to his House as soon as they can turn him out?
A33908And how a Man can have any Authority, who has no Right to ground it upon; or to give him a publick Character?
A33908And is all this nothing?
A33908And is he certain the Hebrews were troubled with none of these?
A33908And is not their Reformation a sufficient Redress of the Peoples Grievances?
A33908And is not this a sufficient meaning?
A33908And is the Doctor offended at this?
A33908And is the Property of Crowns more precarious, and slenderly guarded than that of a Cottage?
A33908And ought we therefore to conclude, that God''s Laws, which provide against these Mischiefs, are either defective or unreasonable?
A33908And pray does not the Doctor do the same?
A33908And that the Devil would not have used Iob thus hardly, if he had not been over ruled by God Almighty?
A33908And were not Iaddus and his Countrymen admirable Subjects at this rate?
A33908And what Countrymen were the Romans?
A33908And what Law is there to chuse a Prince in an Hereditary Kingdom?
A33908And what follows?
A33908And what has the Dr. to say to all this?
A33908And what made him think so then?
A33908And who can now deny him the Title of a Providential Monarch?
A33908And who gave them this Authority?
A33908And who would venture an Execution only for Robbing himself?
A33908And why all these hard Words?
A33908And why must that Usage be put upon Princes, which, if it was offer''d a private Person, would be thought a great Injury?
A33908And will our Author say, That all this was brought to pass by the Influence and Direction of Providence?
A33908And, Is not the Maintenance of Right and the Defence of the Constitution, the Tryal of Integrity, and the giving a noble Example, a very good End?
A33908Are not Bishops de Facto as good as Kings of that Denomination?
A33908Are such Revolutions occasion''d by those Principles which condemn them?
A33908Are the Subjects bound to restore him?
A33908Are they at Liberty to stand neuter?
A33908Are they not bound to defend a Divine Right, which he grants is never parted from Possession?
A33908As for his Flourish with the word Estates, I question whether it will do him any service; for, Who made them Estates?
A33908As for the Text which he cites from Amos, shall there be Evil in a City, and the Lord has not done it?
A33908At present I only desire to know, Whether God loves Peace more than Justice?
A33908Because the Doctor has lead the the way?
A33908Besides, what need was there of a supernatural Direction for the Resolution of a plain Case?
A33908But Fourthly, Is the Doctor sure that the Apostle to the Hebrews knew that their Spiritual Rulers were all Lawfully constituted?
A33908But does not Iosephus say, Iaddus was extremely concern''d how he should meet the Macedonians?
A33908But here he makes a distinction without a difference; for, are not all Entails grounded upon Law, Divine upon Divine, and Human upon Human Laws?
A33908But how long is this Maintenance and Owning to last?
A33908But how long was this Allegiance to last?
A33908But is the Doctor sure the People are at Liberty, not to assist a Prince when he does not please them?
A33908But the Legality of Princes Titles, is a great Dispute among Learned Men; and how then should Unlearned Men understand them?
A33908But what can the minor part of the Subjects, perhaps but a little handful, do towards the restoring their King?
A33908But what if he Strikes at Religion?
A33908But what if the Four Monarchies were not at an End?
A33908But what if the Usurper wo n''t let the Subjects have the Priviledge of their Countrey without these Conditions?
A33908But what is the Penalty the Doctor lays upon Princes, if they do n''t give Satisfaction?
A33908But which way does the Great Body of the Nation absolve themselves from these Oaths?
A33908But why could those Princes never have a Legal Right over the Israelites?
A33908But why his Government?
A33908But why is the contrary Doctrin so dangerous to the Subject?
A33908But why will he not endure them?
A33908But, in Answer to the Doctor''s Demand, I desire to know of him, whether our Ancestors have not a Right to Govern us?
A33908But, pray who says Hereditary Right is the only Ground of the Relation between King and Subject?
A33908By Law?
A33908By what Authority do they these things?
A33908Can Unlearned Men understand nothing about which the Learned differ?
A33908Can a Crowd give a man a Dispensation purely by the Magick of their numbers, and the Disorder of their Meeting?
A33908Can not Providence dispose of Kingdoms without their Leave?
A33908Can the Doctor deny that Subjects are bound to assist their Prince in all just Quarrels?
A33908Can they not do it Lawfully?
A33908Can they rendezvouz themselves into Independency?
A33908Did he order and decree the Revolt of those glorious Spirits, and over- rule them into damnation?
A33908Did his infinite Wisdom fix the Government upon the most incomprehensible Basis?
A33908Did we swear Allegiance to the Country, or has it any Authority over us independent of the King?
A33908Do n''t Men frequently ruine their Health and their Fortunes, and make themselves miserable, by their Vices?
A33908Do they not say it was unlawful for Iaddus to have born Arms, or to have solicited any others to a Revolt?
A33908Do they not say then that God removes, and sets up Kings?
A33908Does God hate Injustice in private Persons, and permit it at the same time to whole Communities?
A33908Does God need the Wickedness of Men to bring his own Counsels to pass?
A33908Does God suffer nothing but what he sees fit to be done?
A33908Does God use to oblige Men to determine Disputes above their Capacity; to lead them into Labyrinths of History, and Perplexities of Conscience?
A33908Does Providence and Government signifie only His Permission?
A33908Does he not suffer all the Wickedness which is committed, for no Man can do an ill Thing whether God will or no?
A33908Does it therefore follow that we must joyn such a prosperous Rebellion; and support it with our Interest?
A33908Does the Authority of a Father last no longer than the Children are pleased to obey him?
A33908Does the Choice of the People, though altogether Illegal, give them the advantage of this Character?
A33908Does the Dr. think no Prince will endure a Man that has any Principles of Conscience?
A33908Does their Number and Quality make them such?
A33908Farther, I must ask him the old Question over again; Whether this National Submission must be Legal or Illegal?
A33908Farther, Was not the destroying Iob''s Cattle and Servants, and the afflicting his Person, an Event?
A33908For do n''t we read that the Devils besought our Saviour that he would suffer them to enter into the Herd of Swine, and he suffered them?
A33908For may not Men make a Recognition of their Duty, and give fresh Assurances to perform that which they were obliged to before?
A33908For unless the Chapters and Canons are to be understood alike; to what purpose is the History premised in the one, and repeated in the other?
A33908For what does this legal Right signifie?
A33908For why should a Man restore that which he is vested in by a Divine Right?
A33908For, by way of Quere, I would gladly know, how there can be a Government without any Authority to administer Acts of Government?
A33908For, under Favor, are not the States bound by natural and sworn Allegiance to their King?
A33908Fourthly, We must Pray for an Unsettled Prince;( that is an Usurper in his own Sense) under the Name and Title of King: Why so?
A33908Had they not Power and Possession on their side?
A33908Has the Prince Resigned or given a Discharge under the Broad Seal?
A33908Have private Rights a firmer Establishment than the publick?
A33908Have they the Liberty to comply, or must they submit to the Penalty?
A33908Have we any Legislative Brick and Stone?
A33908He has a Right it''s granted as much as ever; say you so?
A33908How can that be, when it''s supposed in the Dispute, That he has neither Legal nor Divine Authority?
A33908How could that be?
A33908How does the Dr. know, but that the Rumpers had a National Consent for secluding these Members?
A33908However I desire to be resolved this Question, Would God have a Right to govern the World if he was not Omnipotent?
A33908However, at present, he will not be thus Liberal: For if the Subjects have a bad Prince, who notoriously violates their Rights; What follows?
A33908However, may not God make whom he pleases King without regard to Legal Rights?
A33908I will only ask him, What he thinks of the Rebellion in Heaven?
A33908I would gladly know what the Dr. means by being expresly enjoyned by the Laws of Nature: Has the Dr. any of Nature''s Volumes by him?
A33908If He did, who was it He governed by?
A33908If Power will govern and is a certain sign of God''s Authority, to what purpose are the States convened?
A33908If he had thought it Lawful to submit, why did he not do it before?
A33908If he has not command enough of his Conscience to conquer all these Scruples, what Relief can the Dr. give him?
A33908If not, why should we esteem Multitudes above Justice, and side with the Subject against the Soveraign?
A33908If private Disobedience ca n''t challenge a Divine Right to govern upon Success, why should a National Rebellion pretend to it?
A33908If the Case be thus, What is the Reason of his sending word that he could not submit as long as Darius lived?
A33908If their Precedents and Conclusions hold only for the Kings of Iudah, to what purpose are they brought?
A33908If they have, can they not keep it as well as they did their former one?
A33908If they have, why may they not assign over their Jurisdiction, and choose a Governor for us?
A33908If they may renounce their Active Obedience, Why not their Passive too?
A33908If they must be confined to Temporal Powers, why are they not capable of a farther Limitation?
A33908If we are unconcerned in them, why are they couched into Canons and Principles, and reported with that particularity and exactness?
A33908In a submissive petitioning way?
A33908In what manner?
A33908Indeed why should they not submit?
A33908Is a Wife bound to entertain an Husband de Facto?
A33908Is it Folly to think any Prince will endure such things?
A33908Is it an Unhappiness to value our Honour and Integrity above our Lives, and to expire in Constancy and Greatness?
A33908Is it because they are Personal?
A33908Is it between the Lawful Prince and the Usurper?
A33908Is it the Meaning of the Oath, that we should desert our Prince in his Distress, and refuse him when he has most occasion for our Service?
A33908Is not God''s Authority in a bad Prince( supposing he was really such) as much as in a good one?
A33908Is not this a much more accountable Method, than to resign up our Consciences to Violence, and impetuous Accidents, and to make Treason our Oracle?
A33908Is not, says he, the late King, with his Heirs and Successors, dispossessed by God?
A33908Is there any Reason the Creditor should forfeit, for the Insufficiency or Knavery of the Debtors?
A33908It''s not amiss to ask upon whose account the Appearance of Government is to be secured under an Usurpation?
A33908It''s not at all material as to the Dispute in hand, Whether the Divine Authority affects the Laws of Princes immediately or mediately?
A33908May they not transfer their Right to Resistance, without any Limitation of Conditions?
A33908Might they so?
A33908Must the Laws be broken, and Justice be banished, that people may live at ease in their Sins, and enjoy the Advantages of Rebellion?
A33908Must they not be disturbed, left they should repent and be saved, and for fear Honest Men should have their own again?
A33908Nay, why should they believe any Religion at all, since there are several Learned Atheists who deny it?
A33908Now I desire to know whether the New Man is a Bishop, and has a Divine Right to govern the Diocese?
A33908Now did God raise a Commotion in his own Kingdom?
A33908Now if he was so entirely satisfied about his new Master, why did he risque his Affairs at this rate, and stand off till Alexander was just in view?
A33908Now if the Priviledge of Fathers and Husbands holds in Case of Dispossession, why not that of Kings?
A33908Now is not the taking a Purse, or stealing a Man''s Cloaths, an Event?
A33908Now, what does the Dr. bring to confute himself, and the Reverend Dean, and the Inference I have drawn from them?
A33908Or are they not punished if they are damned for oppressing their Subjects?
A33908Or does a Divine Right depend upon humane Forms and Solemnities?
A33908Or does the Doctor believe it lawful for a Governor of a Town to surrender as soon as he hears the Enemy is approaching?
A33908Or, by the People, who desert or break in upon their Principles?
A33908Or, does the House work by way of Steams and Exhalations, as the Oracle at Delphos is said to have done?
A33908Or, does the nature of Subjection leave them at Discretion, and bind no longer ▪ than they see convenient?
A33908Particularly, did God Govern in England, Scotland,& c. from 1648, to 1660?
A33908Right: But, under Favour, did they do well or ill in absolving themselves?
A33908Sixthly, I would gladly know the Doctor''s reason why Title and Legality must always be expected in Sacred, but not in Civil Authority?
A33908That is, though Lucifer were at the head of it, we ought to give him Provender, and bring our Money in the Sacks Mouth?
A33908Therefore if Possession gives a Divine Right in one case, why not in the other?
A33908They can wait God Almighty''s leisure, retain their Integrity, and save their Souls: And is all this nothing?
A33908This is a severe Charge; How does he purge himself?
A33908Was Iaddus assured that Alexander could not march his Forces to Ierusalem as long as Darius was living?
A33908Was it their way to make the Bishop vote against the Lord; and not only clash with the State, but with themselves?
A33908Were they not Foreigners?
A33908What Authority does the Doctor bring to shew the Emperor''s Titles defective?
A33908What Right have the Members to depose the Head, and Inferiors to displace their Supreme?
A33908What a mortal Obstinacy was this?
A33908What does he think of the Kingdom of Satan, is not that called the Power of Darkness?
A33908What if he has an aversion to Violence, and hates to strengthen the Workers of Iniquity?
A33908What if he is afflicted to see a brave, a generous, and good- natur''d Prince so deeply injured?
A33908What if it is enjoyned us by undeniable Consequence, is not that sufficient without a plain Text?
A33908What if they have an Inclination to Murther, or Adultery, does the Universality of the Consent make such Practices innocent and warrantable?
A33908What if they should willingly submit to the setting up the Alcoran?
A33908What is more common in Religion, and Civil Conversation, than to renew former Engagements, by repeated Promises, and Solemnities of Action?
A33908What made him delay it to the last minute, and give a needless Provocation to the Conqueror?
A33908What reason has an Usurper, who has neither Humane nor Divine Authority, to make himself a Iudge, and a Ruler over Men?
A33908What sort of Dispute does the Dr. mean, and between whom does it lye?
A33908What wonder is it then to find the Canons less wordy than the Historical Chapters?
A33908When do they commence, and what Signs have we to distinguish them by?
A33908When the Doctor supposes he has no Title either from Law, or Providence?
A33908Whence comes it to pass then they are so perfectly sui juris, without a Release?
A33908Whence then comes the sudden Alteration?
A33908Wherefore will Power( humane Power) Govern?
A33908Whether a man can swear away another''s Right without asking his Leave?
A33908Whether he delights to see Men Brethren in Iniquity, and combine for the support of Violence?
A33908Who ever heard, that unlawful Absolving, or a Dispensation against Authority and Right, signified any thing?
A33908Who seems to wonder the Pharisees could not distinguish upon the Prohibition; but took it in too unlimited a sence?
A33908Who would change the Title of Private Property, and throw himself out of the protection of the Law, for such a glittering Uncertainty?
A33908Who would live alone, if Company can do all these Wonders?
A33908Who, that could live any other way, would wear a Crown at this rate?
A33908Whose Fault was that?
A33908Why God allows Usurpers to represent him in the State, and denies this Privilege to those of the same Character in the Church?
A33908Why could not he stand a Siege as well as the Iews had formerly done against Nebuchadnezzar?
A33908Why did he fall short of the Resolution of Tyre, and Gaza, and be out done by mere Heathens in point of Loyalty?
A33908Why may they not attack their lawful Sovereign in the Feild; draw their Sword against acknowledged Justice; and fire upon God Almighty?
A33908Why not, if there is no Malice in the Opposition?
A33908Why should Publick Authority, upon which the common Security depends, have a less firm Establishment than that of single Families?
A33908Why should any Power persecute People to the death, meerly because they are willing to go Heaven, and are afraid of being damned?
A33908Why should he give his Authority to Temporal Usurpers, and deny it to Spiritual?
A33908Why so?
A33908Why so?
A33908Will it govern Right or Wrong?
A33908Will the Doctor say, these Powers are ordained by God?
A33908Would the Dr. have all this Care taken for the sake of Revolters?
A33908Yes, the Dr. grants he may, notwithstanding his dispossession, have a Legal Right to Allegiance, and the Crown; and from whom is this Right due?
A33908why so?
A33908will Power govern whether God will or no?
A29209A trimme gradation, quid tanto dignum feret Observator hiatu?
A29209Adde to this their other tenet; that the Government of the Church with them is Democraticall, or at best bur Aristocraticall, and what will follow?
A29209Again, if the Libertie of the Subject be from Grace, not from pactions or agreements, is it therefore the lesse?
A29209An intire right, what to out Wifes and Children, to our Lands and Possessions?
A29209And doth a Parliament here confesse that they have no cognizance of these?
A29209And good reason, for what can the poor Kingdome expect, where the Person of the Prince is not held sacred?
A29209And he was King in Jesurum, when the Heads of the People and Tribes of Israell were gathered together?
A29209And was not that Protestation contrary, which was by Sir Iohn Hotham imposed upon the Inhabitants of Hull and by them taken?
A29209And when the greatest part of the sheep dislike their Sheepheard, must be presently put up his Pipes and be packing?
A29209Are the flower of the Clergy and Universities, no Body?
A29209Are the most part of the Nobility and Gentry of this Kingdome, no Body?
A29209Are there none for the King but those whom he terms in disgrace Cabinet ● … ouncellers Bishops& Souldiers?
A29209Are you in earnest Sir, that this is destructive to Parliaments?
A29209As for the present puissance of France, can you tell in what Kings Reigne it was greater since Charlemaine?
A29209But both the one and the ● … ther were posteriour to Kings, both in the order ● … f nature and of time: How should it be otherwise?
A29209But doe you think it was penned by Popish Bishops?
A29209But good Sir, if it may be without offence satisfie me in one doubt, what Sect you are of?
A29209But how can this be, except all Parliaments were taken as deadly Enemyes to Royalty?
A29209But if the King were so confident there, why did he raise Forces at Yorke, a place of more assurance?
A29209But if we should be contented to leave three parts of Protestants to joyn with the the fourth, shall we find them unanimous in this?
A29209But is there no remedy for 〈 ◊ 〉 Christian in this case?
A29209But some do say, why then doe sundry eminent Protestant Authors inveigh so much against Bishops?
A29209But they aske, i ● … there no limitation?
A29209But what if the King favour them not?
A29209But what is the ground of all this great cry?
A29209But what is this pride of Kings?
A29209But what is this to your ● … rpose?
A29209But yet if all things be alike, you will say many eyes see more then one?
A29209But you limit it, he ought to deny them nothing which is necessary: what necessity doe yo ● … meane, a simple and absolute necessity?
A29209Can you blame him?
A29209Consider the present Estate of Christendome, what King hath not Subjects of sundry Communions and Professions in point of Religion?
A29209Did he so?
A29209Do you not see private ends in those dayes?
A29209Doe not these Men deserve well of Christian Religion to infuse such prejudicate conceits into the bre ● … of Monarchs?
A29209Doe you desire to be one of the Tribunes or Ephori of England to controule your King?
A29209Dost thou desire to serve God purely according to his word?
A29209Doth any Man think that the Observer instructs his Family with this doctrin, at home out of his chaire?
A29209Even say Sir, doe you thinke that private quarrells and the memory of former suffering ● … did never worke upon any Man?
A29209First shew us your Commission to take his Majesties answer, or at least tell us why Sir Iohn began to raise Forces first?
A29209For a time, what''s that?
A29209Hath His Majesty been a hard Master?
A29209Have they not great cause to thank him, as the poor Persians did their King, when they were condemned, That he was pleased to remember them?
A29209Heretofore we accused the Pope, for saying that he had one Consistory with Christ: doe we now goe about to set up Petty Popes in every Parish?
A29209How discrepant is this from the judgement of former times?
A29209How doe they know that the King is seduced?
A29209How easily were Queens raised and deposed in Henry the eights time by Authority of Parliament?
A29209How many Kings in the World have never known Parliament, neither the name, nor the thing?
A29209How near was Scipioes Conquest of Affricke to be disapointed, by the groundlesse suggestions of his Adversaryes in the Roman Senate?
A29209How often have you seen one or two Men in the Parliament change the Votes of the House?
A29209How shall we judge of Mens intentions best, by their words or by their actions?
A29209How should he know of His Majesties comming by instinct, or a Propheticall Spirit?
A29209How should that be?
A29209How strange is this?
A29209How the Observer joynes Gryphins and Horses together?
A29209How then?
A29209If any Man boggle at it, may he not be overvoted or overawed, as Reuben was?
A29209If any Ordinance may be imposed upon us, without an approbative, or so much as a receptive power in our selves, where is our Liberty then?
A29209If the Sky should fall, what price will Larkes beare?
A29209If they have an extraordinary calling, where are their Miracles?
A29209If you desire to know where was the first forcing of billets?
A29209In the dayes of Richard the second, how did the Parliament ● … change their Sanctions?
A29209Is it because he thinks good Subjects take delight to hear of such an audacious affront put upon their Soveraigne?
A29209Is not this Partiality?
A29209Is not this a doughty Argument?
A29209Is not this fine hocas po ● … as?
A29209Is this a Coale taken from the Altar, or rather from the fire of Hell?
A29209It follows, How should this administer to the King any grounds to levy guards at Yorke?
A29209It was Duty and not a singular desire of perfection that held Davids hands; who can stretch out his Hand?
A29209Iudas of ● … lilee was a great Favorite of the Commons, how did he indeare himselfe?
A29209Lastly, the end is more valuable, how?
A29209Lesbia was free to choose her selfe an Husband when she was a Maide, may she therefore doe it when she is a Wife?
A29209Let the Definition be according to the Major Part of the Votes; but shall the Minor Part be denyed a Liberty to discusse or vote at all?
A29209Now the Maske is off, you have spunne a fair threed, is this the end of all your goodly pretences?
A29209Now will he heare with patience what Hull Men say?
A29209Or the Brethren of Ioseph?
A29209Or would you have us play the Guelphes and Gibellines, to cut one anothers throats for your pastime?
A29209Our Saviour calleth Judas a Devill, Have not I chosen you twelve and one of you is a Devill?
A29209Parliaments( you say) have the same efficient cause as Monarchyes, if not higher,( it seemes you are not resolved whether) Higher?
A29209Quorsum haec?
A29209Quorsum per ● … itio haec?
A29209Reserved for the King?
A29209Secondly, if he had, whether he ought to have produced it?
A29209Shall we without need put our life''s into the hands of crackbrain''d unskilfull Empericks?
A29209Sir, lay aside your eye of envy, which can not endure the beams of Majesty, and tell us what it is in King Charles which doth so much offend you?
A29209So many of the Loyall Commons, no Body?
A29209Some men may be so silly as to aske whether of these two ingagements, the Oath or the Protestation ought to be kept?
A29209That fear of the las ● … and a desire to se ● … re themselves, hath never force any men to personate a part from the teeth outwards?
A29209That if the Laws have not sufficiently provided for the suppressing of riots and tumultuous disorders in great men?
A29209That others have never been like organ pipes to whom the wind of popular applause hath onely given a sound?
A29209The Adulterous woman eateth and wipeth her mouth, and saith, what have I done?
A29209The Observer talkes much of Nature, what Arms hath Nature given but teeth and nailes?
A29209The Person of a bad King is to be honoured for his Office sake, to what purpose?
A29209The Redemption of the World is the end of Christs Incarnation, is the World therefore more excellent then Christ?
A29209The State hath an interest Paramount; what State?
A29209The case being thus, why doe we quarrell one with another?
A29209There is no Tyranny like many- headed Tyranny: when was ● … ver so much Blood shed and Rapine under one Tyrant, as under three in the Triumvirate?
A29209These things therefore must be carefully ballanced, and by whom?
A29209Thirdly whether they who consent out of hope to divide the spoyle, may be said to consent truely?
A29209Thirdly, hath a Generalissimo as large an extent of Power in all respects, as unlimited for time as a Soveraigne King?
A29209To be denyed nothing?
A29209To try Princes and to doe justice; Some man would desire to know how farre this Justice may be extended?
A29209To what end?
A29209To what purpose then are those significant solemnities used, at the Coronation of our Kings?
A29209To whom doth the right of Armour belong?
A29209Trusted and yet reserved?
A29209Upon these feined grounds they build their solemne Protestation; what to doe?
A29209Well, what is the interest of this imaginary State?
A29209Were Hanniball, Scipio& c. the lesse honoured or beloved because they were not independent?
A29209Wh ● … more popular then Simon Magus?
A29209What Divellish Plots would this Doctrine presently raise, if it were received?
A29209What a mixture of pleas is here?
A29209What a stirre is here about consent?
A29209What all?
A29209What ends had the Romans when they made that arbitriment, quod in medio est, populo Romano adjudicetur?
A29209What had the Shechemites by the suggestion of a worthy Member of their Citty?
A29209What had the whole Citty of Ephes ● …, being perswaded by Demetrius and his Craftsmen, that there was a strange plot against Diana?
A29209What is it then which may in probability be thought the ground of this Rebellion?
A29209What is it then?
A29209What is it then?
A29209What is the result of all this?
A29209What is the thing deteined?
A29209What is this against the Magistrate, who is the Minister of God for our preservation and safety?
A29209What is this but to intangle and ingage God in Rebellion, and to put his broad Seale to Letters counterfeited by themselves?
A29209What is this but to make Kings of Subjects and Subjects of Kings?
A29209What is this to the Observers grounds or His Majestyes Declaration?
A29209What ma ● … his fellow Subject ● … expe ● … from the O ● … server, who is ● … o sawcy with his Soveraigne?
A29209What then?
A29209What was the Issue?
A29209What was the Mickle Synod here but a Parliament?
A29209When Abs ● … om sought to ingratiate himselfe with the vulgar, wh ● … course did he take?
A29209When His Majesty objects ● … hat a deposition is threatned, at least intim ● … ted, what doth the Observer answer?
A29209When he had redeemed that Citty from ruine, how was he rewarded?
A29209Where are our English Hearts?
A29209Where did ever the King say that Parliaments without his presence are virtuelesse and void Courts?
A29209Whether the King or Kingdome have been seduced, and by whom, the God of Heaven will discover?
A29209Whether the Observer cite Machiavell true or false, I neither know nor regard?
A29209Who denyes it?
A29209Who ever Proclaimed in the Streets that he had rotten Wares to sell?
A29209Who ever confessed that his meaning was naught?
A29209Who made the Observer a Distinguisher where the Law doth not distinguish?
A29209Whose heart doth not burn within him to heare such audacious expressions?
A29209Why are they crowned?
A29209Will you heare with Patience, what the Irish themselves say of this?
A29209and are they also become infallible in their Consistoryes, at least in their conclusion, not onely in matters of Faith, but also of Fact?
A29209are so many grave Solid Lawyers, no Body?
A29209at Hull: the first drowning of Grounds?
A29209at a Hull: where was the first burning of Houses?
A29209at b Myton neare Hull: where was the first shedding of blood?
A29209but he denieth them the name of Parliaments which is all one?
A29209but how doth the Observer prove either his trust or reservation?
A29209but to shew their judiciary Supremacy: why ino ● … led?
A29209but to shew their personall and Imperiall Power in Military Affaires: why inthroned?
A29209can we play fast and loose and resume it again at our pleasures?
A29209even to an Act of Subsidies?
A29209have we any State in England without the King?
A29209how can that be?
A29209how doe you meane?
A29209if reserved how trusted?
A29209if trusted how reserved?
A29209it was at Hull: where was the first plundering of goods?
A29209it were too much sawcines ● … for a Servant to arrogate it to himselfe; what is then for a Subject?
A29209or the lesse to be regarded?
A29209or will ● … ou permit His Majesty to follow the Dictate of his own reason?
A29209or would you have the great O ● … ke cut down, that you might gather some sticks for your selfe?
A29209shall they first be excluded from all other Professions, and then from their owne?
A29209t ● … Master denyes the act is unjust; so doth the Prince who shall be Arbiter?
A29209then he is but a conditionall trustee, it belongeth to the States and representative body of the Kingdom: but what if the Nobility will not joyne?
A29209to be more eminent in vertue?
A29209was Caesar the private Man lesse succesfull or lesse beloved then Caesar the perpetuall Dictator?
A29209what is freer then gift?
A29209what murthers and assassinates?
A29209what were the Graecian Assemblies, Amphictionian, Achaian, Boetian, Pan- AEtolian, but Parliaments?
A29209what were the Roman Senates and Comitia, but Parliaments?
A29209whether peradventure to depose them and dethrone them, to exalt them& depresse them, Constituere destituere, construere destruere, fingere diffingere?
A29209who reads this and believes not that some great mountain is travelling?
A29209why a Devill?
A29209will a Judge give leave to an E ● … ecutioner to reprive the Prisoner, till he be satisfie of the Legallity of the Judges s ● … ence?
A29209will you be your own Judge?
A29209would it ● … sher into the World?
A29209yes, what saith the Observer to this?
A29209you can paint a Cypresse Tree, but what is this to the purpose?
A29209〈 ◊ 〉 this summons also?
A43621& c. meaning, were you at Church?
A43621( as in biting Irony, he calls the old Bishops:) and how he claws off one of them by name, A. Sparrow D. D. Bishop of Exon?
A43621( if thou be Oedipus,) To Trinkle Members of the House?
A436211, 2. with Christs Disciples for plucking the ears of corn, as they pass''d through the corn fields, and did eat, rubbing them in their hands?
A4362126, 27. who is on the Lords side?
A436218. dayes?
A43621A Cause too good?
A43621And are not those Jews Hebrews?
A43621And can a man retain any good nature, if he quite forget he had a Father and murther''d too?
A43621And can not he be gentile except he bid defiance to all good nature too?
A43621And did not Donatus teach some to make addresses to the weaker Vessels, and to lead Captive silly women?
A43621And have they not cause to bless God and the King every day they rise, that they are not hang''d, drawn and quarter''d, as was Baanah and Rechab?
A43621And is it not deservedly in disgrace?
A43621And is it so indeed good Greg?
A43621And is this all?
A43621And of whose goods then can this Free- booter make a prize on more lawfully and with more justice, than upon the Churches Dignities?
A43621And rowze Tarpollians, that lye sleeping, Ne''er dreaming what cause there''s for weeping, Fasting and Prayers of the Churches?
A43621And what is this that you say unto me; what aileth me?
A43621And what news of the Cat?
A43621And what were the causes?
A43621And why shall not his Majesty keep in memory,( except in Gentleman''s memory) that his Dear Father was murther''d?
A43621And why?
A43621Are not these worthy cares, Mr. Grey beard, for your Learned Fathers?
A43621Are they that are so incessant to this hour in their Cabals, meetings, sending out Spies and Intelligencers into all Quarters, now on a sudden weary?
A43621Are they that would travel as far as Holland, Savoy, Piedm ● … nt, nay to New England, rather than not have their wills, now weary?
A43621As soon as ever I read this news, thought I to my self, and whispered, this is all Leasing, the Factions and Modern Orthodox weary?
A43621But I speak of my Hebrew Tongue, now that it is mended by the University at Tiberias, the Masoreth: What say you to that?
A43621But a wiser than he has told us, who is able to stand against envy?
A43621But bodily worship?
A43621But do we not find the old Hebrew Tongue in those Bibles?
A43621But does not our Saviour bid men search the Scriptures?
A43621But does the Devil drive men to modern Orthodoxy?
A43621But he that should raise the first disturbance of the same nature would he knock''d on the head: would he so?
A43621But is the Good Old Cause( which 〈 ◊ 〉 thought had taken its last sleep,) awake again?
A43621But it would make a man laugh spite of his teeth:( though he had scarce any laugh to spare) at what?
A43621But must they capitulate?
A43621But perhaps you''l say, were not the Translators of the Bible as good Scholars as I am?
A43621But were not the Talmuds both of them writ in Hebrew, the Pharisees saying they were delivered unto Moses upon mount Sinai with the Law?
A43621But what entertainment did the people give it?
A43621But you''ll say perhaps, and object against me, that if this be my religion, why do I not practise it?
A43621But, I say still; did not Adam speak Hebrew?
A43621Can not a King be Gentile, though he retain his nature?
A43621Cat?
A43621Cato had rather men should question why he had no statues erected in honour of his great worth, than why he had any?
A43621Could they fall desired and beloved for their innocence, that liv''d for nothing but to deform the whole Reign?
A43621Depart from me, saith our blessed Lord, I know you not; What?
A43621Did not some lie and say they had no sin?
A43621Did not some make themselves equal to Christ and the Apostles, and so denying the Lord that bought them?
A43621Did not some promote the designs and Plots of their Cabal by a common Purse, and thought it Religion so to do?
A43621Did they not Allegorize the Scriptures, the Passion, and Resurrection of our Saviour?
A43621Did they not confine the Church of Christ to their Conventicles?
A43621Did they not count it unlawful to swear, though in truth, in righteousness, and in judgment?
A43621Did they not cry down all Holy- days and Fast- days,( except long- Parliament Fast- days, and Thanksgiving- dayes for a bloody victory?
A43621Did they not declare it unlawful for the Magistrate to punish hainous offences with Death, or to go to War whether offensive or defensive?
A43621Did they not declare that no man has proprietary in Goods, Lands or Wife, but all should lie common, and without Inclosure?
A43621Did they not deny Salutations, or bidding God speed, to all but their own fraternity?
A43621Did they not deny all superiority and didistinction of Persons and quality?
A43621Did they not gnash their teeth at the Surplice?
A43621Did they not learn to Ca nt, and ascribe every motion of their own spirits, to be the motion of the Holy- ghost within them?
A43621Did they not learn to oppose Bishops from the Contobaptites?
A43621Did they not undervalue Scripture- Authority?
A43621Did you ever converse among the Jews?
A43621Do not the Jews at this day make most use of the Hebrew text of the Old Testament?
A43621Does not the man forget his own Father?
A43621Dost thou say to thy son and servant, you must needs be subject and that for conscience sake?
A43621Dost thou that pleadest the fifth Commandement against thy wicked disobedient son& servant, never plead it against thy self?
A43621Eleventhly, friends, further enquire, How shall we blacken him?
A43621Every day?
A43621For a great many whyes?
A43621For can all our worship of God, prayers, praises, and preachings, observing Lords- days and Sacraments profit God?
A43621Friends, Do you see, friends,( I, now I am in and at it) as I said before, friends, do ye see this Book?
A43621Ha, ha, he, I knew what a Scholar you were: Can you cap Verses?
A43621Had not these fair Manors and Bishops Lands better have been sold and given to the Poor?
A43621Had the Jews no Chaldee Paraphrase before that time?
A43621Had we not spirits that denyed the Kings supremacy in all causes and over all persons?
A43621Had we not the fatum Stoicum from Priscilian?
A43621Has Holland shirts, Perrywig and light Drugget got the Monopoly of true Nobility?
A43621Has he not a mole above his chin?
A43621Has not his present Majesty our Gracious Soveraign as high interest in, and concern for, his Blessed Fathers honour, as his Crowns?
A43621Hast thou power to enjoin Ceremonies in thy family?
A43621Have you kept your tongue from evil- speaking, lying and slandering?
A43621Have you never a little Clergy- man here, for a Gentleman to play with?
A43621He is so far from helping us, that he has rob''d, to his utmost rob''d us, for ever, friends, even as I said but now, friends, do you see?
A43621Help who?
A43621House- cat?
A43621How falsly does he charge the Church of England, when he says it admits none to Baptism without the sign of the Cross?
A43621How many days is there in a year?
A43621I am no Po — It seems then you want a Hebrew Tongue?
A43621I know you not( saith he) why?
A43621I mean do they not understand Hebrew?
A43621If thou be righteous, what givest thou him?
A43621In fa, what an antipathy?
A43621In the name of God what would this people be at?
A43621In what Language was the New Testament first indited?
A43621Is he the better for them?
A43621Is it not froth as applyed?
A43621Is it not meritorious enough?
A43621Is it not possible there should be true honour and vertue under a Cassock or Lawn sleeve?
A43621Is not his Book a Prologue to his Revenge?
A43621Is not the heart of this people hardned?
A43621Is there no eye to pity these, nor house of Correction to be found?
A43621Is there one word of the Spirit in all this Text?
A43621Is this Primitive simplicity?
A43621Is this modern Orthodoxy?
A43621Is this your Gospel Minister?
A43621Is''t not a marvel who this same Gregory Father- Greybeard is?
A43621Is''t not enough that they rob''d him of his Kingdomes and drive him to straits, that he had not where to lay his head?
A43621Is''t not pity but this Gregory should be call''d to the Helm of Government?
A43621Is''t not pity his Majesty does not give him a Letter of Mart, to reimburse himself upon that people, by some of whom he was rob''d?
A43621Is''t not probable men may be drunk by nine a clock?
A43621Look you here, says one of them, do not you see, p. 309. how smartly he ferrets the old Foxes, the Fathers of the Church?
A43621Lord Bishop?
A43621Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name, and in thy name cast out Devils?
A43621No man could steal nor covet, nor be a rebel, nor disobedient to his superiors, if he keep to this Rule; Why?
A43621No man would be a rebel or disobedient to his superiors that is of this Religion; Why?
A43621Now saith little Modern Orthodox; are you there again with your Clypticks?
A43621Now what a blot in the Scutcheon would this be, to all the Lords, Parliament men, Gentlemen and Citizens in England?
A43621Oh but did not these fellows arm the rabble against the King and Bishops upon this very account?
A43621Oh but the Ark, the tottering Ark, what godly heart would not tremble for the Ark of God, as old Eli''s did?
A43621Or House of Lords?
A43621Rummage the Ship, throw overboard What in the Ship may best be spar''d: There; y''have done finely,( have you not?)
A43621Sack possets, Thimbles and Church- gatherings, friends: Nay, do ye see, friends?
A43621Shall I come before him with burnt- ● … fferings?
A43621Sixthly, friends, what shall I say?
A43621So that now baptizing goes before teaching, how do you answer this Mr. Black- coat Chimney- sweeper?
A43621Tenthly, Beloved, And is it so?
A43621Than to say, his whole Reign was deform''d with Ceremonies, Arminianism, and Sibthorpianism, and Manwaring?
A43621The King alone is the Fountain of Honour, and are those streams of honour that flow from him, more pudled in a Clergy than a Lay- Channel?
A43621The Rehearsal Transpros''d?
A43621Then the use we should make of all, should be to begin with an use of enquiry, who this same E. H. is?
A43621Then you would surely take my Hebrew Tongue away, would you?
A43621Therefore since Christ knows not these, there is a greater thing than Gods worship awanting, and which is the one thing necessary, and what''s That?
A43621They tell me?
A43621Thirdly, do ye s ● … e, friends?
A43621Thrown away th''best, the worst forgot; The Masse- Book there,( do you not see?)
A43621To whom does the blessed Apostle speak?
A43621Too was murther''d?
A43621True of hand and tongue, and have kept your hand from picking at and stealing away the credit and good name of your betters?
A43621Were they not pure in their own eyes, but abominated as Dogs all but themselves, and their friends?
A43621What Language spoke our Saviour?
A43621What a dull Thing was he that writ The Advancement of Learning?
A43621What do you say to this now, you with your English Bible?
A43621What is''t?
A43621What need of Jayls or Acts of Indemnity or Uniformity, Licences or Liberty, Indulgence or no Indulgence?
A43621What say you to that, Repartee Con?
A43621What''s that?
A43621What, lose all?
A43621What?
A43621When our Saviour and the Apostles quoted Scripture out of the Old Testament, did they not follow the Hebrew Text?
A43621When the dumb beast opened his mouth, saying, Am not I thine Ass?
A43621When will''t come to my turn( think I) to wait, and make the Gentleman sport?
A43621Where are they?
A43621Wherewith shall I come before the Lord, and how my self before the high God?
A43621Which do you think is the most Authentick apographical Copy of the Septuagint, the Vatican or Alexandrian?
A43621Who are they?
A43621Who dare check them, lest he seem thereby to fight against God?
A43621Who dare speak against their ways, lest he seem to bid heaven battail, and speak against Gods ways?
A43621Who did ever see so much railing in so little a book as his?
A43621Who taught them not to value, or at least, to undervalue the Testimonies of the old TeTestament, but the Manichees and Severians?
A43621Who taught them to cry up the Pulpit, and Sermons only, and decry Sacraments and Prayers, and Charity, but the Eutichites?
A43621Why do you say?
A43621Why should the Wolf be hang''d up, when The Jaccal Scot- free goes?
A43621Why, is Syriack and Chaldee all one?
A43621Why?
A43621Why?
A43621Why?
A43621Workers of iniquity?
A43621Would not Balaams Ass( if alive) open his mouth again, to rebuke the madness of these Prophets?
A43621Would not a zealous and holy keeping Gods holy day bring them to God?
A43621Would not prayers many and long, and good too; and preaching many Sermons, and full good and Orthodox and saving Truths, bring them ● … o God?
A43621Would not the being cry''d up for the most pure and godly party bring them to God?
A43621Would not the worship of God in his own way bring them to God?
A43621Would they afford either an Alms or Charity, or so much as a good word or look to any but their own Sect and Faction?
A43621You have taken away my Gods which I made, and the Priest and you are gone away, and what have I more?
A43621and another on his left knee?
A43621and as honest?
A43621and be uncoverd, when they bid thee be uncovered?
A43621and did they learn this modern Orthodoxy out of the Primitive Simplicity?
A43621and dost thou never send that Scripture home to thine own heart?
A43621and from Aerius?
A43621and get him into the House?
A43621and give it strength, as well as life, by the same methods now, as in 1640?
A43621and have not thy Superiours as much power to ordain Ceremonies in the Church?
A43621and his mother a Strumpet?
A43621and make him laugh, who is not one day without the company of one or other Chaplain( new as the day) to say grace for him, and make him laugh?
A43621and nothing to the purpose?
A43621and one of the three that came over in four Ships?
A43621and then for prayers, long, long prayers, sacrifice, and indeed for all the worship of God prescribed in the four first commandments, who but they?
A43621and who more deserving than Laud, who studied to do both God and his Majesty good service, and was so pious and wise, as aforesaid?
A43621and why?
A43621are not these within an inch and a half at least as bad as a Rationale upon the sacred Common- Prayer?
A43621art thou disobedient?
A43621as it was by the common Hangman; or too good for the Rebel Saints?
A43621at the objection, why did not our Translators of the Bible, render the Original more exactly into English?
A43621can any violate the Majesty of the Father, and the Son be untouch''d and unconcern''d?
A43621can they play the men only to the women?
A43621can those evil speakers, lyars and slanderers,( in the French and Greek Languages, Devils,) now be weary and shame the stock they came of?
A43621continued he; what they?
A43621could the Devil of hell ever abuse and wrest the Holy Scriptures, as these modern Orthodox: juglers and Sermon- mongers have done?
A43621did not the Pharisees eat on the Sabbath days?
A43621do they not know of the going on''t, and how it is laid out,& what they get for it?
A43621had not said trinkle, Trinkle?
A43621has his every day sport( and laughing, and jesting at one or other of the Clergy) How long will it be before it comes to my turn?
A43621having neither accepted Sermon nor Lecture into your holy worship?
A43621is craz''d?
A43621is sermon done?
A43621lose that thou madest a God on?
A43621nay scratches one out of the Grave, L. Andrews late Bishop of Winchester?
A43621never a Droll, or boon companion with a Cassock on?
A43621not know thine own Preachers, prophesying in thy name, and such as have prayed too, Lord, Lord?
A43621now rip them up again when they are healed and cicatrized?
A43621or from Donatus?
A43621or rather who are not so?
A43621or serving God to day?
A43621or what receiveth he of thy hand?
A43621revive the Good Old Cause again, under the name of modern Orthodoxy?
A43621scruple to renounce unlawful oaths and Covenants of disloyalty and Schisme?
A43621should not you have done well in the Cabinet?
A43621tell me seriously, was there ever any argument so vilely ridiculous, as this of the Cat?
A43621that forgetting his serious office, will make a Gentleman merry,& rather than fail, with a Joque upon Scriptures make a little Play?
A43621the King?
A43621then say, his Father too was murther''d?
A43621thou that sayst a man should not steal, or be disobedient; dost thou steal?
A43621too good for what?
A43621too good to be burnt does he mean?
A43621was not the father of this E. H. some Jesuit?
A43621was not the whore- son born at Tripoly?
A43621was their Adversary, or should come to be Garter King at Arms?
A43621were you at sermon to day?
A43621what Cat, do ye think?
A43621what never a Modern Orthodox man that can write like a man or, a Scholar?
A43621what think you of putting that same Cat into the Press?
A43621what would you have?
A43621what''s that?
A43621what?
A43621where''s Hopkins the witch finder?
A43621whose for me?
A43621why?
A43621writ against us, friends; and against our friends; and against Mr. — our friends friend; by one E. H. What is this E. H?
A62548( For that was the question and main point of the Controversy) what three Bishops were there in the realm to 〈 ◊ 〉 hands on him?
A62548( where it is sayd) wherfore brethren labour the more that by good works you may make sure your vocation, this particle by good works?
A625486. vntill this present, had bin ordained, what needed any addition of Priesthood and Episcopacy, which we argued, and they denyed to be wanting?
A62548Ah, why ● ould you not King Henry this when you made him supreme head?
A62548And Tritemius relates how one Gisla a yong woman of their sect, coming to be burned for heresy, being asked whether she were a Virgin or no?
A62548And how doe you know that it vvas an evell spirit vvho told this to Luther?
A62548And in what Court of Judicature would such an vncertain guess, pass for a legal proof?
A62548And is it not a goodly Church that admits of such companions, and fraternity?
A62548And is it not very strange that Mr. Vsher should quote these holy Doctors against themselves, and his own conscience?
A62548And is this all that is exacted of 〈 ◊ 〉 by the Supremacy?
A62548And must we preferr Doctor Abbots, and the English Clergyes corruptions before all these evidences of Scriptures and Fathers?
A62548And their placing it in the temporal Soveraign, but from excess of flattery?
A62548And what can be more legal than an Act of Parliament?
A62548And why should not Christians honor that body which the Devils fear?
A62548Articles, and took the oaths of supremacy and alleigance?
A62548At length being demanded whether Infants receaving the Communion vnder one kind openly in the Church, was a sufficient example?
A62548But How long?
A62548But M. r Iewel leapeth also from this, saying, the question is whether the Holy Communion were ever ministred openly in the Church?
A62548But all Questions in this disputation shall only be questions of fact, whether places be truly alledged or no?
A62548But if the Protestant Clergy be confident of the Iustice of their cause, why do they not come to a tryal?
A62548But if the euidence of sense be fallacious, and the reflections of our mind fallible, what certain knowledg can we haue of any thing?
A62548But if you inquire further, why doth he believe that God revealed it?
A62548But in such a case, how shall the Roman Catholick Clergy be maintained?
A62548But whom hath Christ 〈 ◊ 〉 here in earth his Vic ● ● and head of his Church?
A62548But will you have the truth of the matter?
A62548Calvin''s words are, sed ab ● ● ● dum videtur, Christo elap ● ● m desperotionis vocem?
A62548Century to prove that Christ and his Apostles were Protestants, or taught their reformed sense of Scripture?
A62548Christ confuted the Pharisees, yet could he not put them to silence:& fortior es tu Christo?
A62548Did not Iohn Hus that worthy Champion of Christ and others also of the Martyrs of fore times, say and heare Mass, even to their dying day?
A62548Do not prelaticks run their own wayes, as well as those other Sectaries, in translating the Bible?
A62548Do they not commend as Religious and devout souls such as give them this respect?
A62548Do they not leape from one language and Copy to an other; accept and reject what they please?
A62548Do they stick to either the Greek, Latin, or Hebrew Text?
A62548Do we deceive you?
A62548Do we frustrat the Ghospel of God?
A62548Do we frustrat the words of Christ?
A62548Do we promise you that which he denyeth?
A62548From whence proceedeth their allowing of eating of flesh and fish promiscuously on all days of the year, but from gluttony?
A62548He will answer( as all Hereticks ever did aswell as Catholicks) because God revealed it?
A62548Here you see( saith he) is Oblation, Sacrifice, Altar prayer to Saints, prayer for the Dead, and is all this don in your English Communion?
A62548How are they now maintained in England, Holland, Japan, and China?
A62548How can such a Religion be Catholick either in length of time, extent of Territories, or Conversion of Nations?
A62548How litle the most learned protestants could or can say for their pre ● ended 〈 … 〉?
A62548How many millions of souls are abused by Protestant Ministers, as Julian was by pagan Magitians?
A62548I ask whether Nero was head of the Church or no?
A62548I believe it hath; for it is an acknowledgment that our exceptions were well grounded; but why should they give vs this advantage?
A62548If any Protestants lived then, why did not they speack or write?
A62548If you ask a learned Protestant why doth he believe the mystery of the Trinity, or Incarnation?
A62548If you ask me,( saith he) what do you honor in flesh consumed, and turned into dust?
A62548In what head of Religion do they agree that impugn the Roman Bishop?
A62548Is any sick?
A62548Is not this a Religious worship?
A62548Is not this a wise charge of falsifying?
A62548Is this always true?
A62548Is this the substance of the 〈 ◊ 〉?
A62548Is this your reverence which you giue to God''s word?
A62548J ask not who gave you Bishopricks, but who made you Bishops?
A62548J will help your memory; did you never swear obedience to the Sea of Rome?
A62548Jf God permitt such so many, and all, to erre, why may he not permit thee to erre?
A62548Js it not a strange Religion that must be supported by falshood?
A62548Let all the world be Judge, But Sir, you that pretend to have such a conscience to break an Oath, I pray you did you never swear and break the same?
A62548Let it be tryed in publik Court, which of the two parties are guilty of counterfeiting evidences?
A62548Might not these men be thought mad, or drunk, that would take such a course of defence?
A62548Mr. Fisher askt the Bishop, Quo Judice doth it appear that the Church of Rome hath erred in matters of faith?
A62548Must we al turn Stoiks or Sceptiks?
A62548My second ▪ difficulty was about the tryall of spirits, whether they be of God, or no?
A62548Nam quis vel cogit& absque blasphemia, Deū commodaturum suam propriam vim virtutemque mendacio?
A62548Now if Fox did prove that this great stone was stayed miraculously from falling vpon Luther, something it were; but how can he make that appeare?
A62548O Christ?
A62548O proescindendam itaque linguam,& in partes& frusta lacerandam?
A62548Or that there is no Scripture at all, because he himself or some of his Bishoprick of Duresme do not read the Bible with sobriety and discretion?
A62548SECT: I. Hovv necessary a rational Religion is for a peaceable Government: What Religion ought to be judged rational?
A62548SVBSECT I. VVith what impudency and hipocrisy Bishop Ievell and other prelatick writers began to maintain the Protestancy of the Church of England?
A62548Sacraments, some auricular confession?
A62548Shall we doubt of all Geometrical Demonstrations?
A62548THE ARGVMENT VVhether Protestancy be less dangerous to the soul, or more advantagious to the State, then the Roman Catholick Religion?
A62548That Bishops preferr the Catholick subordination to the Pope before the Protestant equality?
A62548That is to say the Catholick and Universal doctrin of Christ''s Church; and how when King Henry dyed?
A62548That which the Church of Rome holdeth?
A62548The controversy between Protestants and Catholicks is, whether the Roman Tenets be contrary to Scripture?
A62548Their Clergy''s denyall of the Pop''s superiority( which their betters in virtue, birth and learning acknowledg) but from want of humility?
A62548Their denial of the Church''s infallibility( and yet assert in themselves an vncontroul''d authority) but from pride and obstinacy?
A62548Their dulness in confounding the substance with the appearance of bread and wine in the Sacrament, but from sensuality?
A62548These are the words of St. Cyrill, whervpon Mr. Stapleton demandeth: Is this the express order of your Communion?
A62548They were only desired to let the world know, wher, when, and by whom they had bin made Bishops?
A62548To assert mariage of Priests, when St. Paul says Have we not power to lead about a woman?
A62548To what impiety and impudency are men driven by defending heretical novelties?
A62548Was he the head of Christ''s Church?
A62548Was it therfore sayd in vain, whatsoever you shall loos in earth, shall be loosed in Heaven?
A62548Was not this a Holy Church that taught contrary 〈 … 〉 at least doctrin so vncertain that it might be applyed 〈 ◊ 〉 contrary Tenets?
A62548We ask Protestants why do they wrest this place of the Psalme, and corrupt Scripture against the honour which ought to be given to Saints?
A62548We demand their cause of knowledge?
A62548Were not this a good excuse thought J with my self?
A62548Were the keys given to the Church of God in vain?
A62548What can Protestants object against this miracle?
A62548What doctrin taught you when you condemned Lambert the Sacramentary in the King''s presence in Whitehall?
A62548What doth this availe to confute Luthers doctrin of the word of God?
A62548What exceptions or objections can Protestants pretend against the holy and learned Fathers, so impartial Iudges and witnesses?
A62548What greater evidence can there be of heretical obstinacy, then to maintain the real existence of an impossibility, by it''s invisibility?
A62548What if Father Mastrilli had perished by the way?
A62548What if thou being but one offendest?
A62548What those of Egypt ▪ and of the Apostolick Sea?
A62548Wherin doth consist the guilt of heresy?
A62548Whether Christ our Saviour, and his Apostles taught such doctrin?
A62548Whether he revealed the reformed, not the Roman sense of Scripture?
A62548Whether it be policy to continue such statuts?
A62548Who can Imagin that a man pretending not only to be an Arch- bishop, but a Patriarch, would endeavor to maintain Religion by such impostures?
A62548Who hath layd hands on you?
A62548Who say you 〈 … 〉 head?
A62548Wil you hence inferr that these parts of Scripture were not Apostolick or that we need not receive them now, because they were formerly doubted of?
A62548Will they attribute the cure to the power of the Devil?
A62548Will they attribute the prophecy of Mastrillos Martyrdom in Japan to the Iesuits craft, and presumption, grounded vpon hopes and conjectures?
A62548[ n] Dost thou O sole man, and of no accounpt, take upon thee so great matters?
A62548and art thou stronger then Christ?
A62548and how rationally may it be presumed the Pope and all therein concerned, will consent thereunto?
A62548and was it ever so?
A62548and ye Arch- Governors of Christ''s Church?
A62548are the Keyes therof without cause given to the Church of God?
A62548because men may read them indiscreetly, and deprave them to their own damnation?
A62548c. 1. saith: What do the Churches of the East?
A62548can their intercession excuse us, whose 〈 ◊ 〉 doth accuse themselves?
A62548did they imagin that such an addition would end the dispute?
A62548did you not translate Justus Jonas Book?
A62548for Juda to reform her self when Israel would not joyn?
A62548for what difference is ther between a dreaming, drunken, and Diabolical Religion?
A62548from whence, do you prove, from whence do you teach, that I ought to forsake the vniuersal and ancient faith of the Catholik Church?
A62548how and by whom are you consecrated( saith Harding and Stapleton?
A62548neither party( say you) ought to be Iudge in his own cause, who then must decide the business?
A62548or so carless in applying remedies against the grouth, and continuance of errors both damnable and discernable?
A62548or then Pensions to their Widows and Children, when themselves perish in the Service?
A62548or( which is the same thing) whether the doctrine wherby alone he can live, and hope to thrive in this world, be not sufficient to save the soule?
A62548sed postquam tamen alterum necesse est, Priores tibi defer ● Andeberte, Quod si Candida forte conqueratur, Quid tum?
A62548vnde& quādo venistis?
A62548were so many ages ignorant?
A62548were they all Temporisers, and Turn- coats?
A62548what if thou errest and drawest so many into error to be damned with thee eternally?
A62548what justice, subordination, peace, propriety, or prosperity, could be expected in such a government?
A62548what needed they to except against lawes which had bin enacted to favour the doctrin of those Fathers with whom they pretend to agree?
A62548what shall J say here, O ye principall posts of Religion?
A62548what 〈 … 〉 if thou wer ● hanged like a foolish Knave as thou art?
A62548who shall admonish them of their duties, when they are assembled?
A62548why do they oppose liberty of Conscience?
A62548why do they with so many artifices decline reasoning and delude the people?
A62548why so?
A62548will they deny the fact?
A62548〈 … 〉 sayd thou be taught?
A56127& c. What a madnesse is this?
A56127( And what Prelate or Minister hath done this?)
A56127( b) Quid Episcopis cum bello?
A56127( h) Erubesce O superbe cinis, Deus se humiliat, tu t ● exaltas?
A56127( o) Qui ● obs ● ero Laicorum, avidius Clericis quaerit temporalia,& in ● ptius utitur acquisitis?
A56127* Oh, to what base slavery was this King brought by these Trayterly Prelates?
A56127* Thou which art the shepheard ● ettest up and downe shining in gold, and gorgeously attired: but what get thy sheepe?
A56127* What doth a Bishop saving onely the ordering of Ministers, but a Priest may do the same?
A56127* What part hath righteousnesse with unrighteousnesse?
A56127After what Law?
A56127Agreement is a good hearing M. Sanders, but what meane you by this conjunction that the one is become the other, and not still distinguished from it?
A56127Ah Lord God, under that most wicked Queene Iezabel, were not the Prophets, more cruelly handled, than thy faithfull Ministers be now?
A56127Alas thou wretch, and servant of lowest condition, ● o what misery of thraldome hast thou brought thy self?
A56127Alas, what will dances and Galliards profit thee at the last?
A56127All the care of Prelates is in increasing their rents: What?
A56127And I demanding, when remission, of so great calamities might be expected?
A56127And also against your Oath made to your Prince?
A56127And can any then justly complaine of a want of Government in the Church, when it is but altered for the better?
A56127And hath the Prince sufficient authority to put that in ● re which God commandeth, though the Priests continue their wilfulnes?
A56127And how many an hundred thousand pounds hath it carried out of the Realme in our remembrance?
A56127And if ● his Saint was such, what thinke you may his Successors prove, who were not so holy as to be Canonized?
A56127And what shall I speake of Bishops?
A56127And what shall wee in this case do?
A56127And when the Earle asked why so?
A56127And why?
A56127And why?
A56127And why?
A56127And why?
A56127And why?
A56127And why?
A56127And why?
A56127And will you count him or them Aerian ● too?
A56127Anglia furcatis nimium ne fidito mitris: Dic rogo, num serus sum tibi praemonitor?
A56127Anselme, how insolently opposed he himselfe to William Rufus and Henry the first?
A56127Are they not stronger in your owne Parliament house than your selfe, what a number of Bishops, Abbots, and Priors, are Lords of your Parliament?
A56127As though he should say, hath not this world Judges that may decide so base controversies?
A56127At Evening Prayer time, the same day, they came suddenly into the Church with their Swords drawne, crying, Where''s the Traytor?
A56127Behold him speaking, behold him walking Quas gerit ● re min ● s?
A56127Behold the monsters how they are disguised with Miters, Croses, and Hats, with Crosses, Pillars and Pollaxes, and with three Crownes?
A56127Besides, how abominable an example of gathering was there?
A56127But I poore man must be an heretique, there is no remedy, you will have it so, and who is able to say nay?
A56127But I pray you what example hath either he, or blessed Saint Peter, to bind by vertue of an Oath, the other Apostles yearely to visit him at Rome?
A56127But I pray you whether was Kings before Bishops, or Bishops before Kings?
A56127But alas, in what kind of things do they beare themselves for Bishops?
A56127But doe you not remember your owne Law?
A56127But how agreeth this with the example of Christ, which fled away, when the people would have made him a King or a temporall governour?
A56127But how commeth Saint Peter by these regales that you are sworne to defend?
A56127But how standeth it with your Oath toward your Prince, for to be sworne to the Pope?
A56127But how, said ● hey, shall wee know this?
A56127But if the body be polluted, by dancing impudently, how much more may the soule be thought to be defiled?
A56127But oh Lord God what unshamefulnesse is this, thus to delude with words all the whole world?
A56127But shall I tell you what I doe take out of it?
A56127But the objection was, Whether the Bishops should or no?
A56127But what doe I further speake of severall persons?
A56127But what is more pernicious then this dissimulation?
A56127But what meane you by that sentence; Saving mine order?
A56127But what meaneth it, that you sweare onely to the Holy Church of Rome?
A56127But what saith Bellarmine?
A56127But what say you to your Oath made unto your Prince?
A56127But what wonder?
A56127But wherein will you be faithfull to Saint Peter?
A56127But why doe you not sweare to compell the Pope to call a Councell?
A56127But why?
A56127By what authority then claime you this Dominion over Princes, that their Lawes for Religion shall be void unlesse you consent?
A56127Candidus es certè, nec candidus es, Rogitas cur?
A56127Certe nil: dic, Animabus?
A56127Christ saith Luke 12. Who made me a Iudge betweene you?
A56127Collins, who will then set his children to schoole?
A56127Did ever any Presbytery doe the like, or take so much upon them?
A56127Did not the Legate of Rome assoyle all the Lords of the Realme of their due obedience, which they ought to their king by the Ordinance of God?
A56127Doe they therefore pull down the Churches, prophane holy things, that there may be some thing for them to build up and sanctifie?
A56127Doth not the Holy Ghost command that we should honour King?
A56127Es qiud prec ● ● ● lus Domino, quàm hostes, rapto ● es,& intersect ● res arce ● e à popul ● Christiano?
A56127Et p ● cem subjecti ●& fidelibus emere?
A56127Finally, to make him a Saint, and also that God had done miracles to the defending of his Treason?
A56127For if Ierome thought that jurisdiction of a Bishop not to be Iuris Divini, how the ● was that difference introduced by the Apostles?
A56127For now if he be a Traytor, he is to be excused: Why?
A56127For that is the Counsell, and you may shew it to no man, No not to your King, and why?
A56127For their Antiquity, when, and by whom they were first added?
A56127For this purpose, and not for the other, have you received the keyes of the kingdome of Heaven, why then doe you invade other mens bounds or borders?
A56127For upon whom shall my spirit rest( saith the Prophet Esay) but upon the m ● ● ke and lowly, and upon him which feareth my sayings?
A56127For what doth a Bishop, except ordering of others, which an Elder may not doe?
A56127For what have ye done hitherto I pray you these 7. yeares& more?
A56127For what shall I looke for among thornes, but pricking and scratching?
A56127For what?
A56127For who doubts, that the Priests of Christ ought to be accounted the Fa ● hers and Masters of Kings, Princes, and all faithfull people?
A56127For why?
A56127For with what face shall wee expect the honour promised by Christ in the world to come, if our honour hinder Christian unity in this present world?
A56127Furthermore, what reason is it to defend the Popes Prerogative against your Princes?
A56127Goe to now, is here any new thing?
A56127Good right it is that the faith should beare the chiefe rule?
A56127Hast thou need of God in any thing?
A56127Hast thou need of a Patron?
A56127Have not they businesse sufficient wherewith to occupie them in their owne office?
A56127He proceeds thus?
A56127Hee answered, Man, who made me a Judge, or a divider amongst you?
A56127Hee that doth evill hateth the light, and why?
A56127Here is Gods Ruler despised, and hereby is open Treason maintained: Thinke you that God will shew miracles to fortifie these things?
A56127How came this thus?
A56127How causes of Wedlocke?
A56127How chanceth this?
A56127How commeth he now to be so neare of your Counsell in alienating them?
A56127How doth this Lordly and worldly Bishoplike estate agree with Christs words?
A56127How drunke hath shee made them with her wine?
A56127How is it possible to invent a more pestilent Doctrine than this is?
A56127How many a thousand mens lives hath it cost?
A56127How many such Prelates, how many such Bishops( Lord for thy mercy) are there now in England?
A56127How many thinkest thou, have entred Virgins into dances, and returned Harlots?
A56127How many tho ● sands* ● orsware themselves?
A56127How many thousands set themselves above their abilities, partly for feare lest they should be forsworne, and partly to save their credit?
A56127How minister they proving of Testaments?
A56127How then can the Bishop of Rome be taken for the chiefe Pastor of Christ, which these 900. yeares hath not opened his mouth to feed the flocke?
A56127I pray you what pertaineth this to the Office of a Bishop, yearely to visit Rome?
A56127I would here aske a question, Who controlleth the Divell at home at his Parish whiles hee controlleth the Mint?
A56127If he be, you must betray his Counsell, and that yearely: and why?
A56127If imperiall jurisdiction belonged to him, why refused he his calling?
A56127If it belonged not to him, how belongeth it to any of his Disciples or Successours?
A56127If so, then why may not the Presbytery and Synode of Ministers anathematize them, as well as Lord Bishops and Popes?
A56127If the Apostles might not leave the office of preaching to be Deacons, shall one leave it for minting?
A56127If they would looke well thereunto, do not they see on every side detestable sinne to raigne throughout all this your Realme?
A56127If wee be profitable servants, why do wee envie the eternall gaines of our Lord for our temporall sublimities?
A56127If when I will retaine my Bishopricke I disperse the flocke of Christ, how is the dammage of the flocke, the honour of the shepherd?
A56127Is Paul a foole, and doth he not know what he doth?
A56127Is it lawfull to discuss ● and determine that, which it is not lawfull to pronounce?
A56127Is it not knowne openly to the world who they be that commit these lewd deedes?
A56127Is not God greater than all Saints?
A56127Is not here a marveilous blindnesse and obstinacie against their Prince?
A56127Is not that Shepheards hooke the Bishops crosse, a false signe?
A56127Is not that White Rotchet that the Bishop and Channons weare so like a Nunne, and so effeminately, a false signe?
A56127Is not this a marvellous Hypocrisie, to be called servant of all servants; and yet desire to be taken as Lord and King over all Kings?
A56127Is not this too much, both to be Traytors to your King, and also to faine God to be displeased with your King for punishing of Treason?
A56127Is not your Prince nearer, and more naturall unto you then this wretch the Pope?
A56127Is that also not a false signe?
A56127Is the hand or power of God now shortned and minished?
A56127Is there never a Gentleman meete nor able to be Lord President?
A56127Is there never a wise man in the Realm to be a Controller of the Mint?
A56127Is your Communion Table rayled in, so as Cats and Dogges( he might as well have added, Rats and Mice) can not get through unto it?
A56127It is demanded( writes he) why Paul here makes no mention of Presbyters, but onely of Bishops and Deacons?
A56127Last of all, was not king Iohn faine to deliver his Crowne unto the Legate, and to yeeld up his Realme unto the Pope, wherefore we pay Peter- Pence?
A56127Loe I make answer, Shall the Word of God( I beseech you) for this your fained objection be neglected, and shall therefore the whole people perish?
A56127Make Lawes against them?
A56127May not her Highnesse serve Christ in making Lawes for Christ, without your liking?
A56127May not the Prince command for truth within her Realme, except your consents be first required and had?
A56127None is so simple to move such a fond objection: but the objection is, Whether the one be coincident to the other?
A56127Now I pray you in God his name what did you, so great Fathers, so many, so long a season, so oft assembled together?
A56127Now if there were the greatest difference between these in the power of order, had not Ierome bin very sottish in his argument?
A56127Now whereas, he saith,* What doth a B p except ordination, which a Presbyter may not do?
A56127Now who knoweth not, that Christ was sent of his Father to preach the Gospell?
A56127Now, what was this but an act of Treason, Treachery, and injustice, to thrust the right Hei ● e from the Crown, and set up an Usurper?
A56127O Lord God how have we beene blinded thus trayterously to handle our naturall Prince?
A56127O Lord, for thy mercy shall we not company with them?
A56127O Lord, whither shall wee flee from them?
A56127O how much emptinesse And vanity Lord Prelates Mindes possesse?
A56127Of whether order therefore be they?
A56127Or doe you thinke other Churches not holy?
A56127Or what such service did he therein?
A56127Or you your selves, either accepted before God, or better discharged toward the people, committed unto your cure?
A56127Ought we to thanke you, or the Kings highnesse?
A56127Quae enim sunt De ● data ea ipsa sunt piis usibus dedicata ● Quid enim pot ● rit sanctius esse quàm Christiani populi sal ● s?
A56127Quid exclamastis?
A56127Saint Augustine saith:* What is a Bishop but the first Priest, that is to say, the highest Priest?
A56127Saint Paul saith, every man shall rise againe in his owne order: but in what order shall these rise?
A56127Sent not the Pope also unto the king of France remission of his sinnes to goe and Conquer king Iohns Re ● lme?
A56127Septies?
A56127Si peccaverit in me frater meus, quotiens dimittam ei?
A56127Singest thou whorish Songs, casting away the Psalmes,& Hyranes thou hast learned?
A56127So England I speake it to thy shame, is there never a Nobleman to be a Lord President, but it must be a Prelate?
A56127Some men will say, wouldst thou that men should fight in the 〈 ◊ 〉 unpunished?
A56127Tell me I beseech you, hath not our Peter here largely and plainely touched our most delicate and tender Bishops?
A56127Than which speech what can be more absurd?
A56127The Bishop seeing him so gazing, sayd unto him; What dost thou see here, that thou dost marvell so greatly?
A56127The King not distrusting his cause, sent some Earles unto the Councell, demaunding why he was summoned thither?
A56127The Prince and the parliament, you say, had no power to determine, or deliberate of those matters ● And why so?
A56127The preaching of Gods Word is hatefull and contrary ● nto them: why?
A56127Then asked hee mee, if I thought it now unright( seeing the Ordinance of the Church) that one Bishop should have so many Cities?
A56127Then said the Shepheard, what if the Devill should take and beare away the Prince shall there remaine any thing of the Bishop?
A56127Then sayd the shepheard againe, I beseech you my Lord, will you give me leave to speake a word?
A56127Theobald how proud was hee against King Stephen?
A56127These 900. yeares I say?
A56127They being set down, meate immediatly was brought, and the Bishop began merrily to eate; but what followed?
A56127Thinke yee ● here can be a greater plague to a Christian Realme than to have such Ghostly Fathers of the Kings Privie councell?
A56127This is a proper elusion, M. Sanders, thinke you to escape thus?
A56127This is childish wrangling, I aske, if God command, whether the Prince shall refuse to obey till the Clergy confirme the same?
A56127This is your owne Law, and against this will you sweare?
A56127Tu pro Papae authoritate ab hominibus concessa, contra dignitatum Regalium authoritates mihi à Deo concessas, calliditate arguta niti praecogitas,?
A56127Was not this a good Prelate?
A56127Well, well, Is this their duty?
A56127What Councels had Charles for the Church Lawes and Chapters which he proposed and enjoyned as well to the Pastors as to the people of his Empire?
A56127What Law can be made against them that they may be availeable?
A56127What among stones, but stumbling?
A56127What and in all men be contained your Prince?
A56127What are Priests Garments more than others?
A56127What councels had Iustinian for all those Ecclesiasticall constitutions and orders,* which hee decreed ● and I have often repeated?
A56127What difference is there betweene a Bishop and Spirituall Minister, or Presbyter?
A56127What doth it profit( saith Christ himselfe) if hee do possesse all the World, and all the Kingdomes, and do cast away his owne soule?
A56127What fruite is come of your long and great assembly?
A56127What hast thou to doe with the revennues of the Exchequer, that thou shouldest neglect the cure of soules, but ● or one short houre?
A56127What have ye engendred?
A56127What have yee brought ● orth?
A56127What is a Bishop in English?
A56127What is that to receive a childe in Christs name?
A56127What is the cause that they do not execute this their office?
A56127What is the meaning of these words: But you not so?
A56127What is your Surplesse or Lords Table worth if it were to be sold?
A56127What names have they?
A56127What neede you to sweare thus unto the Pope?
A56127What neede you to sweare to S. Peter?
A56127What needeth this?
A56127What now?
A56127What other workes can come from the Devills working tooles than commeth from the hands of his owne malignant mischiefe?
A56127What prevaileth it for any King to marry his daughter or his Sonne, or to make any peace or good ordinance for the wealth o ● his Realme?
A56127What signifieth that the Prelates are so bloody, and cloathed in Red?
A56127What signifieth the Pollaxes that are borne before high Legates A Latere?
A56127What therefore shall be done unto you?
A56127What threatnings beares he in his mouth, with how Great pride treads he upon all things below?
A56127What, hath Christ elected thee to the receipt of custome?
A56127When are bowling- allies& Tavernes more frequented?
A56127When are there more Dances in most places to the sound of the Harpe and Lute, then on these dayes?
A56127When are there more sumptuous feasts kept?
A56127When more lascivious songs heard?
A56127Whence hath this execrable presumption prevailed; that unworthy men, should covet dignities?
A56127Whence hath this plagu ● crept up?
A56127Where was all his Superfluity to keepe your pretended hospitality?
A56127Where''s the Traytor?
A56127Wherefore doe you sweare, 12 not to alienate your goods, without the Popes licence?
A56127Wherefore then doe you here sweare against your owne Law?
A56127Wherefore then put you this in your Oath, seeing you can not alienate your goods with his consent nor yet without it?
A56127Whether Bishops and Pastors of the sheepe of Christ may rule temporall Kingdomes?
A56127Which also for what cause left he the Bishopricke of London?
A56127Which for what service done in Christs Gospell came he to the Bishopricke of Lond ● n?
A56127Who is it, Mr. Speaker, but he onely that hath advanced all Popish Bishops?
A56127Who knoweth not that properly, and of their owne nature temporall Kingdomes should not be ruled of spirituall Pastors, but of Temporall Kings?
A56127Who murthered King Edward the second, and famished King Richard the second most unseemingly?
A56127Who of all you shall dwell with everlasting burning?
A56127Who overthrew King Herald, subduing all his land to the Normans?
A56127Who procured the death of King William Rufus, and caused King Stephen to be throwne in prison?
A56127Who requirest us not to administer, but to deprave us in administring: than which, what can be more unhappy?
A56127Who slew Christ?
A56127Who slew his Apostles?
A56127Who slew the Prophets?
A56127Who subdued and poysoned Kings Iohn?
A56127Who troubled King Henry the First, and most cruelly vexed King Henry the second?
A56127Why are they not set to the Schooles where they may learne?
A56127Why are you no ● rather sworne to defend Peters net and his Fisherie?
A56127Why are you not rather sworne to keep?
A56127Why do ye not boldly& manfully resist?
A56127Why do ye not break forth all of you together?
A56127Why doe ye not here rise?
A56127Why doe you not swe ● re to follow his living?
A56127Why dost thou therefore againe revoke them?
A56127Why dost thou( I say) wittingly a ● d wilfully perish?
A56127Why then shoulld our Bishops challenge any such primary or superiority over their fellow Ministers?
A56127Why wilt thou conioyne these things which God hath separated?
A56127Why, I beseech you, doe we not every where use Churches, Chalices, and Priestly vestments?
A56127Will you all hold your peace, and say nothing at all?
A56127Wilt thou ● that I tell thee at one word what they are?
A56127With that, in came these murthering Rebels, crying, Where is the Traytor, Where is the Traytor?
A56127Ye have oft sit in consultation, but what have ye done?
A56127Yea verily, when I pray you, are there more sinnes committed then on Holidayes?
A56127and to be true to your owne Church of the which you have taken cure and charge?
A56127and to feede?
A56127and to preach and teach his Doctrine?
A56127because they will have such a head, as they be members: for how could else their Kingdome stand?
A56127had he not as large a Commission as he gave?
A56127how great Tragedies did Thomas of Canterbury, whom you have canonized for a Saint for Sedition, raise up against Henry the second?
A56127how oftentimes doe we finde that holy men have sinned& erred?
A56127is it all one to subject their Kingdomes to the Christian faith, and to subject their Kingdomes to the Bishops?
A56127is this a meere office for a Priest, to be controllers of Mints?
A56127is this a meete office for a Priest that hath cure of soules?
A56127is this his charge?
A56127is this their calling?
A56127knowest thou not the danger of Dances?
A56127num quia nondum factum illud est, ficri idcircone nunc non convenit?
A56127on those dayes, in which the spirit is to be fed and recreated; in them shall we more overwhelme him with wine and uncleannesses?
A56127or could he give that he had not?
A56127or did they ever deal so with their Princes, as our Prelates did with King Iohn, or with Edward, and Richard the second?
A56127or else to the Church of Rome?
A56127or else to the Holy Church of England?
A56127or else to the* Pope?
A56127or how could Ierome prove out of the Apostles writings, that there was not any difference betweene them?
A56127or if any man dye intestate?
A56127or is it so horrible an heresie as hee maketh it, to say, that by the Scriptures of God a Bishop and a Priest are all one?
A56127or knoweth hee how farre, and unto whom, he reacheth the name of an Hereticke?
A56127or that your Pope may be King, and his Bishops Princes of both?
A56127or why are they not sent to Universities, that they may be able to serve the King when they come to age?
A56127quanto premit omnia fas ● u?
A56127seeing that he was never no King, but a Fisher?
A56127shall wee company with them?
A56127thinke you that ● he will compell you by your Oath to be true to her?
A56127those dayes wherein wee ought to please God most, shall we in them more provoke him unto anger with our wickednesse?
A56127to maintaine his worldly honours, dignities, or riches?
A56127to nourish?
A56127what agreement hath Christ with Belial?
A56127what are these walls more than others?
A56127what fellowship hath light with darkenesse?
A56127what good can you doe to the Church of Rome, or what profit is it to her that you sweare?
A56127what hath the merriment of the flesh to doe with the gladnesse of the spirit?
A56127what infirnall furies scare us out of our wits?
A56127what one thing that the people of England hath beene the better of an haire?
A56127what the solemnities of God, with the feasts of Bacchus and his crue?
A56127what went you about?
A56127what would ye have brought to passe?
A56127what( I had almost said) among Scorpions, but stinging?
A56127when are there more execrable kinds of Playes Fooleries, and scurrilities?
A56127when thou shalt have danced long, what shalt thou gaine at length ● but wearinesse of body and sicknesse of minde?
A56127where is greater Pompe in all appendicles?
A56127whether forasmuch as they have sinned without order, shall they perish without order?
A56127whether stirred other first, you the King that ye might preach, or he you by his Letters, that ye should preach oftner?
A56127which of us would not tremble, who would not exclaime?
A56127who answered, If hee be a man of God, then obey him: They replying, How shall wee know him to be such a one?
A56127who can deny the Bishops to be the instruments of satan, understanding the Scriptures, and beholding their daily doings?
A56127who the Martyrs, and all the righteous that ever were slaine?
A56127why was not the Revell rather scandalous to the text?
A56127will you be traytors to the Holy Church of Constantinople?
A56127ye have had many things in deliberation, but what one put forth, whereby either Christ is more glorified, or else Christs people made more holy?
A56127yea moreover wittingly, and willingly dost cast away thine owne soule for the most deceitfull pleasure of this life?
A56127yea what an over- sight is it of you, to let your selfe thus to be bound?
A56127you have defiled the Spouse of the Maker, and thinke you by flattering service to pacifie the friend of the Bridegroome?
A56127● oe to then, what will you say here, I beseech you?
A92147( for absolutenesse Royall will amount to shedding of innocent blood) for if any oppose the King, or say, Sir, What doe you?
A921471. make any thing against the lawfulnesse of defensive warrs?
A921471. prove that in no case it is lawfull to resist the King?
A9214710. inspire Samuel 17. to call the people before the Lord at Mizpeh, to make Saul King?
A9214711. and whereby the King may oppresse, and no man may say, What dost thou?
A9214712, 13, 14. and what, will this prove Presbyteries to be inconsistent with Monarchies?
A9214714. to take the people of Gods fields and vineyards, and olive- yards, and give them to their servants?
A9214715. had commanded Fornication and eating of blood, might not the Assembly forbid these in the Synod?
A9214716. except they receive a power so to doe from God?
A9214718. but had Herod and Pilate any warrant to crucifie him?
A9214718. for Christ excepteth none, and how can men except?)
A921472 When sacred Hierarchy, the order instituted by Christ, is overthrown, what is the condition of Soveraignty?
A921472. shall the Prelate and the Anabaptist inferre; Ergo, he giveth it not by plowing, sowing, and the art of the husbahd- man?
A9214727. and how did Israel conspirc with Absolom, to unking and dethrone David, whom the Lord had made King?
A921473. and was it not an act of tyranny in King Achab, to take the vineyard of Naboth, and in King Saul?
A9214731?
A921474.?
A921474?
A921476. can be said to judge in Gods place, and not receive the power from God immediatly, without any consent or covenant of men?
A9214769. saith Fern, can Power in the abstract have praise?
A921477, 8. is it therefore in famine, unlawfull to till the earth, and seeke bread by our industry and are we to doe nothing but to pray for daily bread?
A921478. and why not of foureteen degrees, as well as the Great Turke, or the King of Spaine?
A92147A King hath power of life and death,( saith the Prelate) What then?
A92147A King is a creature of Gods making onely; and what then?
A92147A man may render himselfe totally under the power of a Master, without any conditions: and why may not the body of a people doe the like?
A92147All these are inseparably in the Crown, but he stealeth in Prerogative Royall in the clause which is now in question?
A92147And do I not resist his person in the one, as in the other?
A92147And for the Churches weaknesse, that is, the weaknesse of the damned Prelates, shall this be the Kings weaknesse?
A92147And how a King and a Tyrant differ?
A92147And how is it that David anoynted by God is yet no King, but a private subject, while all Israel make him King at Hebron?
A92147And if birth was equivalent to divine unction, what needed Ioash who had royall birth, be made King by the people?
A92147And if they may defend themselves by defensive wars, how can wars be without offending?
A92147And is not this the sinne of the Land, that they suffer their King to worship Idols?
A92147And is that charitable of Kings, that they will not be so mad as to destroy their owne Kingdome?
A92147And they that resist the Kings power, resist the King?
A92147And was it a heresie that M. Melvin taught, that Presbyter and Bishop are one function in Scripture?
A92147And what if the subject disobey the Great Turk?
A92147And what instruction was it to King or people to write to them a book of the wicked waies of a King, which nature teacheth without a Doctor?
A92147And what then?
A92147And, if they reteine some of it, habitu, in habit, and in their power?
A92147Are they only possible and accidentall?
A92147Asa his enemies fought against him for his sins, and the peoples sins; shall Moses and the people, Hezekiah, Asa, do then nothing but pray and suffer?
A92147Athanasius said, God hath given Davids Throne to Kings: What, to be Head of the Church?
A92147Because God is light of lights, doth he not enlighten the earth and aire by the mediation of the Sun?
A92147But have we now Kings immediately sent as Saul was?
A92147But how came they to their Thrones for the most part?
A92147But it may be asked, if no passive subjection at all be commanded as due to Superiours?
A92147But the question is, concerning the designation of the person?
A92147But what Law?
A92147But what doth this prove?
A92147But what ground( saith the Royalist) is there to take Arms against a King?
A92147But what is all this?
A92147But what then?
A92147But whence is it that a man free is now snared as a beast in a gin or trap?
A92147But where are Kings persons, as men, said to be of God, as the Royaltie in abstract ● i ●?
A92147But why stand we on the place?
A92147By this?
A92147By what antiquity doth the Crosse signifie Christ?
A92147By what word of God can the King close the mouth of the man of God, whom Christ hath commanded to speake in his name?
A92147Can Fathers decide Controversies better then the Word of God?
A92147Can he be a Father, and a Guide, a Patron to us against our will?
A92147Can this man pray for the King?
A92147Channels?
A92147Did Julian rejoyce in Gods salvation?
A92147Doe not they that resist the Parliaments power, resist the Parliament?
A92147Eliah said more to Ahab then What hast thou done?
A92147Every Prince is subject to God, but not as a vassal: for a Master may commit felonie, and lose the proprietie of his farme; can God do so?
A92147For I demand, How doth the son succeed to his fathers Crown, and Throne?
A92147For why will he submit all other controversies to the judgement of the Fathers?
A92147God complaineth of the violence of Kings: Is it not for you to know judgement?
A92147God hath joyned King and Power: who dare seperate them?]
A92147Had the Lords of the Philistims, have the States of Holland no power but from a Monarchie?
A92147Hast thou eaten of the tree whereof I commanded thee that thou shouldest not eat?
A92147Hath the Father and the sonne, the Master and the servant one Morall subsistence?
A92147Have I conceived all this people?
A92147Have Kings no pillars to their thrones, but Antichristian Prelates?
A92147Have the Venetians any power from a King?
A92147He should be under one Law of God to be executed by men, and not under another Law?
A92147Heare our Prelate: How is it imaginable that Kings can be said to Iudge in Gods place, and not receive the power from God?
A92147How can that be a permissive Law of God, and not his approveing Law by which Kings create inferiour judges?
A92147How could they make the ● r Emperours absolute?
A92147How is the spirit of Prophecie and Government infused in them, as in King Saul?
A92147How shall violence remove violence?
A92147How the inferiour Iudge is the deputy of the King?
A92147How then are we to beleeve, that God would make an universall Law contray to the Law that he established before Israel had a King?
A92147How then can the Liar say, that the Puritan conspireth with the Iesuite?
A92147How then can there be any majestie derived from them?
A92147How was any thing extraordinary, and above a Law, seeing David might have killed his enemie Saul, and according to Gods Law he spared him?
A92147How will this black mouthed Calumniator, make Presbyterians to dethrone Kings?
A92147I am God, I sit in the seat of God, should not be controlled by the Prophets, and no man should say to them, What sayest thou?
A92147I ask when these Emperours took away lives and goods at pleasure, Was that power ordained by God?
A92147I ask when these Emperours took away lives and goods at their pleasure; was that a power ordained of God?
A92147I conceive not; hath the adopted sonne his life, his being, the figure bodily, the manners of the sonne in whose place he is adopted?
A92147I pray you, who are the oppressors?
A92147I pray, P. P. what is this Church power?
A92147I. VVHether Government be by a divine Law?
A92147If Aaron make a golden Calfe, may not Moses punish him?
A92147If Moses turne an Achab, and sell himselfe to doe wickedly, ought not 80 valiant Priests and Aarons both rebuke, censure, and resist?
A92147If he have such a power as a King given him of God to destroy and waste the people?
A92147If he meane the King in abstracto, that is, the royall dignity, whom speaketh he against?
A92147If the King bring in an Army of forraigners, then a politique community must defend it selfe in a rationall way; Why?
A92147If the King say Masse, shall the Church judge and censure the King for intrusion?
A92147If the King( saith he) shall vex the Common- wealth or one part thereof, with great and intollerable cruelty; what shall the people do?
A92147If the Traveller contend to have his purse againe, shall the Robber say, Robberie was blessed with peace?
A92147If the inferiour Iudges in the act of judging, were the Vicars, and Deputies of King Jehoshaphat, he would have said, Judge righteous judgement; Why?
A92147If thou say, behold we know it not, doth not he that pondereth the heart consider it?
A92147If when the Parliament erreth, the remedy is left to the Wisedome of God, why not when the King erreth?
A92147If, and how the King may punish himself?
A92147In what Scripture hath God Almightie spoken of a fancied Prerogative Royall?
A92147In what sense Government is from God?
A92147Indigencie is the originall of Tutors, the Parents dye; what then shall become of the Orphan and his inheritance?
A92147Is authoritie subjected solely in the Kings Law, and no whit in his Person, though put upon him both by God and Man?
A92147Is it not supreme in its kinde of Church power?
A92147Is it not to deal thy bread to the hungry?
A92147Is it unlawfull with the sword to resist them?
A92147Is it( fit) to say to a King,( Thou art) ● icked, and to Princes,( Ye are) ungodly?
A92147Is not this a punishment inflicted by inferiours upon a superiour, according to the way of Royalists?
A92147Is power of blood, either the Kings; or inherent inseparably in his Crown?
A92147Is the restraint laid on by mans law?
A92147Is there no lawfull resisting of ills of punishment, but meere prayers and patience?
A92147Is this an extolling of Kings?
A92147Is this inconsistent with Monarchie?
A92147Is this not a voluntary action, proceeding from a free active, elective power?
A92147Is this questioned, but Kings should be prayed for; or are we wanting in this duty?
A92147Is this the Prelates Logick?
A92147It is a vaine thing to say, Who shall be judge betweene the King and his subjects?
A92147It is an ignorant speech, to ask, Is Authoritie subjected solely in the Kings Law, and no whit in his Person?
A92147It is true, where there is a King, soveraignty must be inviolable, What then?
A92147It were unlawfull to say to the King of Cyrus, What sayest thou?
A92147Knowest thou not, that I have power to crucifie thee?
A92147Lastly he saith, God tooke away Saul in his wrath; but I pray you did God onely doe it?
A92147Let us grant( saith he) that a societie shall refuse to have a Governour over them, shall they be for that free?
A92147Moses his face did shine as a Prophet receiving the Law from God, not as a King: and is this Sunshine of Heaven upon the face of Nero, and Julian?
A92147Mr. Bishop, what better is your Affirmanti incumbit,& c, then mine?
A92147Now is the King, as King, to intend this halfe end?
A92147Now what is the Pope of Rome his extent?
A92147Of the many Kings of Judah and Israel, how many chose this?
A92147One man hath not strength to fight against an Army of ten thousand: doth it follow?
A92147Or if jura majestatis be any such Prerogative?
A92147Royalists can not say so, what ground to say one of Davids acts in his deportment toward Saul was extraordinary, and not all?
A92147Shall the inferiour Judges be guilty of innocent blood, because the King will not doe his duty?
A92147Shall the people in that case serve the King of Kings, onely at the nod, and Royall command of an earthly King?
A92147Shall they obey man rather than God?
A92147Shall we take this upon the word of an excommunicated Prelate?
A92147Should not this be an unjust charge to the people, if God onely, without any action of the people, should immediatly set a King over them?
A92147Si enim hostes extraneos, non tantum vindices occultos agere vellemus, deesset nobis vis numerorum& copiarum?
A92147Sittest thou to judge me after the Law?
A92147So God is the immediate Author of the Pastors, of the Apostles Office, ergo, it is unlawfull to resist a Pastor, though he turne robber?
A92147So all acts of taking away the lives of ill- doers, shall be acts of homicide in Holland: how absurd?
A92147So the King is not an in inferiour Iudge: What?
A92147Some Knights, some Ships, some Cities and Burroughes, do carry a crosse; are they made Christs vice- gerents of late?
A92147Some will have it in a collective body, but how?
A92147Sometimes all is cast upon one mans voice, why may not the King be this one man?
A92147That is true, but was it not arbitrary to them to breake a law Physically?
A92147The King hath his right from God: What then, not from the people?
A92147The Parliament( saith Williams) may not command the King: Why then make they supplications to him, if their Vote be a Law?
A92147The Prelate eating his tongue for anger, striveth to prove, That all power, and so Royall power, is of God: but what can he make of it?
A92147The forme is for the action, therefore the action is more excellent then the forme, and an accident then the subject or substance?
A92147The people are to say, You are Gods, and your power is below, saith the Prelate: what then?
A92147The question is, For what end is a King made so happy, as to be exalted King?
A92147The question may be, which of these governments be most agreeable to nature?
A92147The state of the question is much perverted, for these be different questions, Whether the Kingdom may dethrone a wicked and Tyrannous Prince?
A92147The three hundred sinned in resisting Midian, and defeating them: Why?
A92147This Assembly is to judge, what Doctrine is treasonable; what then?
A92147To apply the subject to the accident, is it any thing else but to apply the accident to the subject?
A92147To whom can it be due to give the Kingly office, but to him only who is able to give the indument and abilitie for the office?
A92147To whom can it be more proper to give the rule over men, then to him who is the onely King truely and properly of the whole world?
A92147V. Whether or no, the P. P. proveth, that Soveraignty is immediately from God, not from the people?
A92147Was therefore Manasseh not lawfully called to the Crown?
A92147What King going forth to warre?
A92147What a meane resistance is?
A92147What a sinne is it to rob God, or the King of their due?
A92147What essentiall and fundamentall priviledges are left to Parliaments?
A92147What followeth?
A92147What if he turne Tyrant, and destroy his Subjects with the sword?
A92147What if the King command not his people to serve God; or, What if he forbid Daniel to pray to God?
A92147What if the Royall line surcease?
A92147What is on man under no restraint, but made a God on earth, and so drunk with the graunder of a sinning- God, here under the Moone and Clouds?
A92147What is the law of the King, and his Power?
A92147What is this, but I inhibite you to be creators by omnipotent power?
A92147What law of man?
A92147What meaneth he?
A92147What more resistance is made to Royall power by wals interposed, then by Seas and miles of earth interposed?
A92147What more unbeseeming Kings is it to swear to do their duty, then to promise covenant wayes to do the same?
A92147What more vaine?
A92147What need Israel strive, when Moses and Aaron are two Independents?
A92147What power hath the King in relation to the Law, and the people?
A92147What power the People and States of Parliament have over the King, and in the State?
A92147What power the People, and States of Parliament, hath over the King, and in the State?
A92147What reason is in this consequence?
A92147What relation the King hath to the Law?
A92147What shall they reserve to make a new King, if this man dye?
A92147What then?
A92147What then?
A92147What then?
A92147What then?
A92147What then?
A92147What then?
A92147What then?
A92147What, shall it then follow, that he worketh nothing in the creatures by their mediation, as causes?
A92147What, will the Prelate make them independent Kings for that?
A92147What?
A92147What?
A92147What?
A92147What?
A92147When God doth apply the person to royall power, what?
A92147Whence is it that this man, rather then this man, is crowned King?
A92147Where is the Law of the Kingdome called a Law of punishing innocent people?
A92147Where is the negative voice of the King here?
A92147Where read he this?
A92147Where the word of a King is, there is power, And who may say unto him, What doest thou?
A92147Where the word of a King is, there is power: and who may say to him, what dost thou?
A92147Whether England be a conquered Nation at the beginning?
A92147Whether Government be warranted by a divine Law?
A92147Whether Magistrates, as Magistrates, be naturall?]
A92147Whether Monarchy be the best of governments?
A92147Whether Nature hath determined, that there should be one supreme Ruler a King, or many Rulers in a free Commnitie?
A92147Whether Royalists by cogent reasons do prove the unlawfulnesse of defensive warres?
A92147Whether Royall Power and definite forms of Government be from God?
A92147Whether Royall Power, and definite Forms of Government be from God?
A92147Whether Subsidies be due to the King as King?]
A92147Whether absolute and unlimited power of Royaltie, be a ray and beame of Divine Majestie, immediately derived from God?]
A92147Whether all Christian Kings are dependent from Christ, and may be called his Vicegerents?
A92147Whether all Governments be but broken Governments, and deviations from Monarchie?]
A92147Whether doth the P. P. with reason ascribe to us the doctrine of Jesuites, in the Question of lawfull defence?
A92147Whether doth the P. Prelate upon good grounds, ascribe to us the doctrine of Jesuites in these Questions of lawfull defensive Wars?
A92147Whether every free Commonwealth hath not in it a supremacie of Majestie, which it may formally place in one, or many?]
A92147Whether is Royaltie an immediate issue and spring of Nature?]
A92147Whether is the Coronation of a King any other thing but a Ceremonie?]
A92147Whether or no Goverment be warranted by the Law of nature?
A92147Whether or no Royall dignitie have its spring from nature, and how that is true( every man is born free) and how servitude is contrary to nature?
A92147Whether or no Soveraigntie is so from the people, that it remaineth in them in some part, so as they may in case of necessitie resume it?
A92147Whether or no Wars raised by the Estates and Subjects for their owne just defence against the Kings bloody Emissaries be lawfull?
A92147Whether or no any Prerogative at all above the law be due to the King?
A92147Whether or no are subjects more obnoxious to a King then Clients to Patrons, and servants to Masters, because the Patron can not be the Clients Judge?
A92147Whether or no he be more principally a King, who is a King by birth, or he who is a King by the free election and suffrages of the people?
A92147Whether or no passive obedience be a meane to which we are subjected in conscience by vertue of a Divine Commandement?
A92147Whether or no self- defence against any unjust violence offered to the life, be warranted by Gods Law, and the Law of Nature and Nations?
A92147Whether or no the King be Vnivocally, or only Analogically, and by proportion a father?
A92147Whether or no the King be in Dignity and Power above the people?
A92147Whether or no the King be in Dignity and power above the people?
A92147Whether or no the King be the sole supreme and finall interpreter of the Law?
A92147Whether or no the people have any power over the King, either by his oath, covenant, or any other way?
A92147Whether or no the people make a Person their King conditionally, or absolutely; and whether the King be tyed by any such covenant?
A92147Whether or no the people make a Person their King conditionally, or absolutely?
A92147Whether or no the suffering of the Martyrs in the Primitive Church militate against the lawfulnesse of defensive wars?
A92147Whether or no, Soveraigntie is so in and from the people, that they may resume their power in time of extreme necessity?
A92147Whether or no, Wars raised by the Subjects and Estates, for their own just defence against the Kings bloody Emissaries, be lawfull?
A92147Whether or no, any Prerogative at all above the Law be due to the King?
A92147Whether or no, he be more principally a King, who is a King by birth, or he who is a King by the free election of the people?
A92147Whether or no, the King be onely and immediately from God, and not from the people?
A92147Whether or no, the King be the sole, supreme and finall Interpreter of the Law?
A92147Whether or no, the P. Prelate proveth, by force of reason, That the people can not be capable of any power of Goverment?
A92147Whether or no, the convening of the subjects without the Kings will, be unlawfull?]
A92147Whether or no, the people have any power over the King, either by his Oath, Covenant, or any other way?
A92147Whether or not Royall birth be equivalent to Divine Unction?
A92147Whether or not Royall birth be equivalent to divine unction?
A92147Whether or not a Kingdome may lawfully be purchased by the sole title of conquest?
A92147Whether selfe- defence by opposing violence to unjust violence be lawfull, by the Law of God, and Nature?
A92147Whether the Estates of Scotland are to help their Brethren the protestants in England against Cavaliers?
A92147Whether the King be above Parliaments, as their Iudge?
A92147Whether the King be above the Law or no?
A92147Whether the King be above the Law?
A92147Whether the King hath a Prerogative Royall above Laws?
A92147Whether the King have the power of warre only?
A92147Whether the King may, in his actions, intend his owne Prerogative and Absolutenes?]
A92147Whether the King of Scotland be an absolute Prince, having Prerogatives above Parliament and Laws?
A92147Whether the King of Scotland be an absolute Prince, having prerogatives above Laws and Parliaments?
A92147Whether the P. Prelate conclude, that neither constitution, nor designation of Kings is from the people?
A92147Whether the Prelate proveth by force of reason, that the people can not be capable of any power of Government?
A92147Whether the Seas, Floods, Road- wayes, Castles, Ports publike Magazine, Militia, Armour, Forts and Strengths be the Kings?]
A92147Whether the Subjects be obliged to pay the debts of the King?]
A92147Whether the power of Warre be onely in the King?
A92147Whether the power of the King as King be absolute, or dependent and limited by Gods first mould and paterne of a King?
A92147Whether the power of the King as King, be absolute, or dependent, and limited by Gods first mould and patern of a King?
A92147Whether the supreme Law, the safetie of the people, be above the King?
A92147Whether was King Uzzah dethroned by the People?]
A92147Which is the best government, that is, the most profitable, or the most pleasant, or the most honest?
A92147Who art thou that disputest with God?
A92147Who made the King?
A92147Who should then punish and coerce the Parliament in the case of exorbitance?
A92147Whother the King hath any Royall prerogative, or a power to dispence with Lawes?
A92147Why did God at this time rather use an extraordinary meanes of saving his Church?
A92147Why is not royalty then founded on grace?
A92147Why might not the people of Israell, Peers or Sanedrim have convened before them, judged, and punished David, for his Adultery and Murther?
A92147Why not to the Prophets and Apostles?
A92147Why the King a breathing Law?
A92147Why?
A92147Why?
A92147an 1641. never answered, couched under the name of inconveniency?
A92147an head over such as will not be menbers?
A92147and by the sole power of the bloudy sword?
A92147and he that keepeth thy soul, doth he not know it?
A92147and hee argueth from a morall duty, he is the Lords annoynted, therefore I will not kill him?
A92147and how doth the Lord v. 22. expresly shew to Samuel, and the people, the man that they might make him King?
A92147and shall he not render to every man, according to his work?
A92147and so what need to fetch a Royall power from Heaven, to be immediatly infused in him, seeing the people hath such a power in themselves at hand?
A92147and that Abbots and Priors were not in Gods book?
A92147and was it against the Oath of God to defend themselves by Armes?
A92147and what needed Saul and David, who had more then royall birth, even divine unction, be made Kings by the people?
A92147and whether there be such a thing as a Covenant tying the King no lesse then his subjects?
A92147and why did David seek an oath of Ionathan?
A92147and why then do Royalists talk to us of Gods immediate creating of Kings, without any interveening action of the people?
A92147are all these inconveniences only?
A92147as David and Hezekiah?
A92147dic ubi legis: and is this a proof of inconsistency of Presbyteries with a Monarchie?
A92147did God grant Nero his hearts desire?
A92147doth it exclude the peoples consent?
A92147ergo, the Pastor is above all the Kings Lawes?
A92147even to have peace and safety, surrender themselves fully to the power of a King?
A92147have I begotten them?
A92147is this a different action from the peoples applying the person to royall dignitie?
A92147life eternall to Heathen Kings, as Kings?
A92147may not the Soveraigne power be eminently, fontaliter; originallp and radically in the people?
A92147no: or that David consulted the oracle of God, what to do when Saul was coming against him?
A92147non Reges quoque accidere solent?
A92147of France only an Hunter, Alphonsus Dux Ferrariensis only an Astronomer, Philippe of Macedo only a Musitian, and all because they are Kings?
A92147or doth he naturally resemble the father as the naturall sonne doth?
A92147or if jura Majestatis be any such Prerogative Royall?
A92147or is it from the people also, and their free choise?
A92147or is it subordinate to the King?
A92147or is the Iudgement the Kings?
A92147quid ergo?
A92147shall it follow that the soveraigne in concreto may not be resisted?
A92147that flying is resistance?
A92147was it extraordinary that David fl ● d?
A92147was this extraoardinary above a law?
A92147were not these Rulers lawfull Magistrates, armed with power from God?
A92147what then?
A92147will he guide me as a Father, an Husband against my will?
A56384''T is an holy and a precise Man, and it looks demurely, and then what if he be sawcy to his Superiours?
A56384( says our Author) were not the Pharisees a People morally righteous?
A56384* My Friends, do you consider what you attempt?
A56384A singular way of dispute this, is it not?
A56384And do we assert the practice of Morality to be the great and most essential Design of Religion?
A56384And for this, what more convictive Evidence can I give you, then the Experience of our own Conversation?
A56384And had they been collected out of their Original Authors, what a notable Proof had he given the World of his Encyclopediacal Reading?
A56384And here what a gaudy shew of Learning might I make?
A56384And how do they imbroil and discompose the peaceable setlement of a flourishing Kingdom?
A56384And how dogmatically will they assign the precise bounds of Orthodoxy?
A56384And if this be to speak Daggers, how heavy will the Charge fall upon all the Professors of Controversial skill?
A56384And is it not a shameful Incongruity, that my Reply should contradict my Objection?
A56384And is not this Eristically spoken, and as becomes a Man puissant in Polemick Squabble?
A56384And lastly, why must a Power of creating new Relations between them, infer a Power to change their Natures?
A56384And now are not these admirable Principles to be pleaded in an Apology for Liberty of Conscience?
A56384And now do you tell me whether you ever observed in any Writer more generous strains of Candour and Civility?
A56384And now is it possible for these men to be at a loss for Scripture to countenance their proceedings, after this rate of imposing upon the Word of God?
A56384And now is not this a modest man, to boast of the faithful adherence of himself and his Confidents to the present Government?
A56384And now tell me how I could have drawn up the state of this Controversie in a plainer or more familiar Method?
A56384And now under the Appearance of this Christian Tenderness and Compassion to the poor Soul, how insolently will she despise his Person?
A56384And now upon this account it is that I proposed to have Preachers obliged to speak Sense as well as Truth: but is not this an uncouth Motion?
A56384And now were it not strange that Men should be bound to yield more to the humour of a peevish Jew, than to the Commands of a Christian Magistrate?
A56384And now what remarkable difference remains there between the Infirmities of the Children of God, and the Impieties of the Wicked and Unregenerate?
A56384And now will not the Lord avenge his Elect that cry unto him day and night?
A56384And now, Sir, tell me what I shall conclude of this Mans Conscience?
A56384And now, what think you?
A56384And to what an heighth of Confidence was the young Sizer perk''t with the success of his Rumford- Performances?
A56384And what Clouds of Words has he pour''d forth to involve the Evidence of my Arguments, and the plainness of my Method?
A56384And what an obliging Favour is this, when they will sacrifice their own Reputation to the Glory and Renown of his Attributes?
A56384And what could ever stop the fury of so endless and so unreasonable a Principle?
A56384And what course did he pitch upon?
A56384And what else can be expected from the design and nature of the Discourse it self, that endeavours to make out such a nice and Metaphysical Devotion?
A56384And what indefatigable Pains will they take to distinguish rank Blasphemy into Orthodox Divinity?
A56384And what now if those intended do not believe these things, nor any one of them?
A56384And what so delicious to people of this complexion, as to be the first Founders of Changes and Innovations?
A56384And what stronger evidence can we desire to prove them Religious Rites, than their being appropriate to Religious Duties?
A56384And what that is I have often and long since informed you out of his own Word, and would you have greater Assurance?
A56384And what though he has justified the faithfulness of his Collections, by the most exact and scrupulous References?
A56384And when he has got the poor, naked and defenceless Thing alone, how unmercifully does he turn and tease it into a thousand postures?
A56384And who can endure to see Men, that are so horribly bemired, bear up with so much State and Confidence?
A56384And who gave him this Authority, to impose silence on us, or else to prescribe a certain sort of Verse to which we must be confined( r)?
A56384And will he not give glorious Assistances to your Undertakings?
A56384And with what Impatience would you swagger at the Man that should dare to impeach you of Hypocrisie?
A56384And with what dexterity will they fetch about a Prophetick Parable, and draw the Fundamentals of Christianity out of Ezekiel''s Wheels?
A56384And with what disdain and insolence do they spit at her way of Worship and Devotion?
A56384And with what indefatigable Industry will they spread and improve the Tale?
A56384Are not all Penalties both threatned and inflicted purely as Inducements to Obedience?
A56384Are not the several Tunes of mercy and judgment in these Songs?
A56384Are the Officers of the Kings Forces divided, or irresolved in their Counsels?
A56384Because he is engaged in point of honour, What shall he do for his great Name?
A56384Because some honest Men are maliciously traduced, shall that discharge all others of just Accusations?
A56384Begin to serve Providence in great things, but can not finish?
A56384But do we expose the Follies of their Divinity with any briskness of Reason?
A56384But do you, or any of his own Lay- proselytes understand this Scholastick subtilty?
A56384But farther, Is this the Plea of all Nonconformists, or but of one Party?
A56384But how came it first to gain the Authority of Prescription?
A56384But how shall we satisfie and inform our selves of that?
A56384But how will this plain dealing justifie such Professors, as pour forth daily Confessions of the blackest and most presumptuous Sins?
A56384But however, suppose all the unhappy Inclinations of our Natures may be charged with actual guilt; yet what is that to outward Transgressions?
A56384But however, what is all this to our Author?
A56384But however,''t is a lewd and ungodly Assertion, and therefore away he flies with it; What?
A56384But if he should be so ill- advised, what will become of me?
A56384But if you demand of them, Where lies the real exception against Symbolical wickednesses?
A56384But is it not a mean design for a Man to press his Wits and Parts to carp at other Mens Expressions?
A56384But says our Nicodemus,( for he is very thick of Understanding when he pleases) How can these things be?
A56384But still, what if those intended do not believe these things?
A56384But thou trifler, what is this to my defiance?
A56384But to be short and serious, Were you ever in all your Life entertain''d with such Fairy Tales and meer Romances in matters of this importance?
A56384But what do I think of the Confessions of Ezra, of Daniel, and others, in the Name of the whole People of God?
A56384But what is all this to his Inference of the Magistrates absolute and immediate Power over Conscience?
A56384But what is it that has moved so much Zeal and Choler?
A56384But what is that to me?
A56384But what is this Dainty Thing they value at so dear a Rate?
A56384But whatever the meaning of the Oracle may be, why must it be limited to instituted rather than customary Symbols?
A56384But when he approaches my main design, how slightly does he balk the weightiest Reasonings?
A56384But who are they that belong to this Covenant?
A56384But who gives in this Information?
A56384But who so presumptuous as those Smatterers, that have onely Learning enough to prefer them to the Pillory?
A56384But yet how can I avoid it?
A56384But, Good Sir, have you any Patent for the Monopoly of making Conclusions, that you can force your Neighbours to accept what Ware you please?
A56384Can I not use the Terms of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and uncontroulable Power, but one must immediately be thought a Definition of the other?
A56384Can you imagine any thing judged more scandalous in these Mens Case- Divinity, than the horrid Crimes of Peace and Obedience?
A56384Did I ever accuse him?
A56384Did I not forewarn you of what heights and depths of Ingenuity we should meet with, before we arrived at the Conclusion of this Paragraph?
A56384Did ever Man burthen the Press with such slender stuff, or present the World with such pitiful entertainment?
A56384Did ever Man treat Adversary with fairer and more ingenuous Usage than I have met with from this candid Author?
A56384Did ever any Man make such wretched Apologies?
A56384Did he counterfeit any business?
A56384Did he divert to salute a Friend?
A56384Did he pretend a visit?
A56384Did you ever read a greater strain of Modesty and Humility?
A56384Did you never hear of such Creatures as Presbyterians, Anabaptists, and Independents?
A56384Do any Professours doubt the Event of the War?
A56384Do any of those wretched Miscreants begin to think of Hell, and Halters, and, with Iudas, stand agast at the horrour of their Crime?
A56384Do some of the old Souldiers and Officers begin to whisper Cavalierism and Loyalty?
A56384Do the Presbyterians and Royalists begin to make head against those bold and bloody Usurpers?
A56384Do the Protestants, covenanted Protestants, that had sworn in the presence of the great God to extirpate Popery and Prelacy?
A56384Do they profess''t is their Duty, their Principle, their Faith and Doctrine, to be obedient to their Rulers and Governours?
A56384Do we but press People to an Imitation of the Life of Christ?
A56384Do we demonstrate any of their Notions of Practical Godliness to be giddy and unwarrantable Conceits?
A56384Do we upbraid the Impostures of their Superstition with any sharpness of Wit?
A56384Do you know what dreadful and horrible things are still behind?
A56384Does he bring you forth to burn the Whore, to fight with the Beast, and overcome him, with his Followers?
A56384Does he not leave you( as himself speaks) in the Briers of unscriptural Distinctions?
A56384Does not Wales cry, and the North cry, yea, and the West cry, come and help us?
A56384Does not the Lord, think you, require that in the great things which he has to accomplish in this Generation, all his should close with him?
A56384For is this to Discountenance Trade, to say, that Liberty of Conscience is but an ill way to improve it?
A56384For must we discard any or all of our Ceremonial Constitutions?
A56384For tell me, Sir, is it nothing to shake the Foundations, and hazard the Overthrow of a setled Church?
A56384For what more effectual and irresistible Inducements can Men have to an Holy Life, than a firm Belief of the Promises and Threatnings of the Gospel?
A56384For where lies the Inconsistency between these two Propositions?
A56384For who( says he) understands what are the Affairs of Religion here intended, all or some?
A56384Hath it not been by the blood of the Saints?
A56384How briskly will they warrant this Opinion, and explode that?
A56384How can you doubt or suspect its truth, when''t is the talk of all the Town?
A56384How dexterously does he cull out a single Proposition to oppose to the scope and plain meaning of the coherent Discourse?
A56384How did their old Father of Rome refresh his spirit, to see such Chariots as those provided to bring England again unto him?
A56384How do they dread the Superstition of a Symbolical Ceremony?
A56384How does this Man both vanquish and oblige us by his Civility?
A56384How have they earned the Titles, Eldest Son of the Church, The Catholick and most Christian King, Defender of the Faith?
A56384How infinitely have they excelled all the Wits of former Ages in this Noble, but neglected Art?
A56384How is this Man puft up with a conceit of his own Knowledge?
A56384How might he have scowr''d the World, as once Theseus did?
A56384How might his Immortal Pen have clear''d the Age of the pest of Writers, as Herc''les Club did Greece of Thieves and Robbers?
A56384How then shall we justifie our selves in running thus giddily into these wild and unwarrantable Schisms?
A56384How would it sting and inrage, and grate upon your soul?
A56384How would you stomach a smart reproof?
A56384How?
A56384However, might not the Faith ascribed to Abel relate to the discharge of his Duty, and not to the manner of its Performance?
A56384However, why may we not affirm the same thing of Ceremonies, that he is here pleased to appropriate to Words?
A56384I beseech you, Good Sir, will this Mans bashfulness never leave him?
A56384I say, Who would, unless one that thinks himself able to face me out of my plain meaning, and bear me down out of countenance and common sense?
A56384If I am guilty of this Charge, I must shift as I can: but if I am not, what hinders but we may shake hands and be friends?
A56384If all these combine together against Sion, shall they prosper?
A56384If by chance and accidental usage, why may not the Civil Magistrate be allowed as much Power to warrant their lawful Significancy, as Popular Custom?
A56384If he have but a warm Brain and a bold Face, with what ease may he fire the Rabble into Tumults and Godly Seditions?
A56384If it be not, then Men may speak Non- sense, and yet speak neither, and then what becomes of this pert and doubty Exception?
A56384If this be all, to what purpose are our Phylacteries?
A56384In brief, What thinks he of the Advantage of the Kingdom of Christ, in the shaking of the Kingdoms of the World?
A56384In brief, what means their bestowing nothing but fair Words upon themselves, and nothing but foul Language upon us?
A56384In the next following Section I demand, why, forsooth, this Proposition must be limited to matters of Religion only?
A56384In the next place, what do I twit him with the Feasts of the Dedication, and the Fasts of the Captivity, when I have no proof of their being approved?
A56384In what great strains do I urge the necessity of its admittance?
A56384Into what woful and endless Schisms do they drive their Proselytes from her Communion?
A56384Is Monarchy to be for ever abolish''d, and the new Common- wealth establish''d?
A56384Is he perfidious to his Engagements?
A56384Is it not strange to see Men that are so obnoxious, to be so confident?
A56384Is it nothing for Subjects to withdraw their assistance from their Prince and their Country?
A56384Is it nothing to discompose the Publick Peace and Tranquillity of a setled State?
A56384Is it nothing to keep up implacable Feuds and Animosities among Members of the same Commonwealths?
A56384Is it nothing to rend the Body of a Church into numberless Schisms and Contentions?
A56384Is it nothing to violate the Fundamental Laws of Love, and Peace, and Charity?
A56384Is not here Affliction and deliverance, desertion and recovery, darkness and light in this variously?
A56384Is not their stomach to it, think you, as good as ever?
A56384Is there not as much malice in the false Accusations of a virulent Tongue, as in the Proscriptions of an outragious Tyrant?
A56384Is there nothing to take down his Stomach, and asswage his Courage?
A56384Is this to fill up the Law of Moses,( as you pretend) to abridge his whole Volume into a single Text?
A56384Is this, must we think, no point of Faith, Opinion, or Iudgment?
A56384It is so, but what in the name of Sphinx is this to our Enquiry, what has Liberty from the Law of Moses to do with Liberty of will?
A56384Must all this noise and stir be made, and the King and Parliament thus disturbed for this?
A56384Must they be acquitted, because Socrates was not guilty?
A56384Now if these things are so, who can charge the utmost severity of Expression with intemperance of Speech?
A56384Now what exorbitances will not this wild principle excuse and qualifie?
A56384Now what if Apollinarius had decried the Verses of this Father because they were not all Heroicks, or all Iambicks, or such as he most fancied?
A56384Now what shall a Man do in this case?
A56384Now what signs have you given us of your having renounced this Principle of Rebellion?
A56384Now what was this new and this great Light, that God held forth as the horns in his hand to the Believers of that Generation?
A56384Now what wise Man will care to appear abroad in such broken and uncertain Times?
A56384Now who( think you) can withstand all this Rage and Fury?
A56384Now with what outragious Declamations does I. O. set upon these harmless Assertions?
A56384O that Wales, O that Ireland, O that France, where shall I stop?
A56384O, what a Catalogue of Mercies has this Nation to plead by in time of trouble?
A56384Or are all the Stories that are recorded of them fairy- tales and Romances?
A56384Or can they assign any natural Immorality in instituted, more than in customary Significations?
A56384Or what complacency so delightful as that which springs from spiritual Pride?
A56384Or what insolence so intolerable, as that that bears up upon mistakes of Conscience and Religion?
A56384Otherwise, how could every young Prentice be taught to rail at me, as an Enemy to his Preferment?
A56384Shall Bankrupts of all Faith and Honesty expect to be trusted upon their bare words, that have so often proved perfidious to their Oaths?
A56384Shall we tamely part with that that was purchased by our Saviours Bloud?
A56384Socrates was abused, and so may any good Man; what then?
A56384Solomon sure doth not simply forbid us to answer a Fool; and what hinders but that a man may laugh and speak the truth?
A56384Still courting Dangers, and still swaggering after so many Foils and Disgraces?
A56384The People may murmur among themselves, Is this poor Pretence the only ground of all our Schisms and Disturbances?
A56384Their dissolute and unruly tongues are let loose to tear in pieces his good name; What abusive Tales, and Legends do they invent?
A56384Then what is Prelacy but a meer Antichristian Encroachment upon the Inheritance of Christ?
A56384There is a vast difference( is there not?)
A56384There is no imaginable Connexion that I know of between his and their Actions; to what purpose then is it to defend themselves with his Innocence?
A56384They are resolved to joyn Throats to Vote him down; and if they do, to what purpose is it to Complain or Remonstrate?
A56384This is the scope and Contexture of my Argument; to all which, what is replyed by our Author?
A56384Though as for Repentance, what is it but an exchange of vicious customs of Life, for an habitual course of Vertue?
A56384Thus our Author stands amazed that Heresie should complain of Schism, Quis tulerit Gracchos,& c. Shall the Pot call the Pan Burnt —?
A56384Thus were the Essex Committee delivered from the Cavaliers at Colchester?
A56384Thus, are the People of England enraged against them for murthering their Soveraign?
A56384Thus, does a Child of God fall into any scandalous miscarriage?
A56384To declaim, as our new Doctor doth against this way of dealing?
A56384To what purpose does he tell us''t is an impregnable Sanctuary of disturbance and sedition?
A56384To what purpose does he tell us, the Power I ascribe to Magistrates is none other but that which is claimed by the Pope of Rome?
A56384To what purpose does he twit me for asserting Magistratical Omnipotency, rather than the Divine Right of Episcopacy?
A56384To what purpose?
A56384Was there ever such a brazen head of slander as this, that dares thus groundlesly, and thus foully asperse such a spotless Integrity?
A56384Were the Parishioners of Coggeshal once in great danger of the Enemy?
A56384Were there never any such men in the World as Iohn Knox, Iohn of Leyden, and I. O?
A56384What Disturbances do they create in the State?
A56384What I pray has been their main business for 700 years and upward, even almost ever since the Man of Sin was enthroned?
A56384What a Flower of Chivalry is this?
A56384What a strange Man is this Author of the Friendly Debate, to amass together so many Quotations out of W. B?
A56384What a vain thing is this Humane Learning without Grace, and the Teachings of the Spirit?
A56384What are the Consciences of Men?
A56384What are they?
A56384What did they we do not?
A56384What else can this Man design by such crude and blundring Cavils, but meerly to amuse, or( what is the same with them) satisfie the People?
A56384What empty and shallow Pretenders to Knowledge were Archbishop Laud, and all his Favourites, if compared to this unfledged Curate?
A56384What enraged Malice could have struck with a more angry sting?
A56384What greater displeasure can you possibly do a man, then to rob him of his self- complacency?
A56384What if he should impose things sinful and superstitious, what inconveniences would this bring upon the Government of the World?
A56384What if they do openly disavow every one of them, as for ought I ever heard or know they do, and as I do my self?
A56384What if they have abused the most sacred Oaths and Protestations, to cheat the Simple, and betray the Innocent?
A56384What if they pretend the instigation of the Spirit of God, to Authorize the foulness of their Enterprizes?
A56384What ignominious Titles do they fasten upon her Friends and Followers?
A56384What is Man, that he should be clean?
A56384What is it that so much enrages the Roman Clergy, but that we will not suffer his Holiness to usurp upon the Rights of Princes?
A56384What is the reason that so many in our days set their hands to the Plow, and look back again?
A56384What is this but a Description of the 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉, or Gentile- Worshippers?
A56384What means their Confinement of the Preaching of the Covenant of Grace to their own Doctrines, and their own Congregations?
A56384What means their boasting of themselves as the onely powerful, Soul- searching, experimental and spiritual Preachers?
A56384What precious Men should many be, would they let go the work of God in this Generation?
A56384What reward shall be given or done unto thee, thou false Tongue?
A56384What scurrilous Language do they continually pour forth against the Church of England?
A56384What shall one then answer the Messengers of the Nation?
A56384What strange Conceptions has the poor Soul of Regeneration, of the Spirit of Bondage, and the method of Conversion?
A56384What tell you me( says he) of the Feast of Purim, was it not a Civil Observance?
A56384What then can be the importance of this mighty Cavil?
A56384What thinks he of Good Principles becoming wicked and abominable, when taken up against the Providence of God?
A56384What thinks he of Monarchic Governments being a Jewish Ceremony, a part of their Pedagogy and Bondage, and abolish''t by the coming of the Messiah?
A56384What thinks he of Songs upon Sigionoth?
A56384What thinks he of ensuring Success to Cromwel''s Army against their Soveraign, by dark passages out of the old Prophets?
A56384What thinks he of the Kings being a Son of Tabeal, i. e. one that would have usurpt the Crown without Right or Title?
A56384What though men every where combine and associate themselves against you?
A56384What though some prove false and treacherous, some base and cowardly?
A56384What unclean Congregations are those that have such foul Mouths?
A56384What would helpless Macedonians give for one of your Enjoyments?
A56384What, are these things so indeed?
A56384What, shall we suffer these Heathen Princes to usurp upon our spiritual Priviledges?
A56384Where has the Word of God prescribed this distinction?
A56384Whether the rude Multitude are not more inclined to disturb Government by Superstition, than by Licentiousness?
A56384Who almost is ignorant, that in the Primitive Church they always concluded their publick Prayers in form of Benediction, wishing Peace and Unity?
A56384Who could have nickt me with such a subtilty, but one that knows all his Advantages, and is thoroughly experienced in all the shifts of Cavil?
A56384Who gave Mary Queen of Scots, the Title of Iezabel?
A56384Who shall assign the just Limits of their respective Dominions?
A56384Who that of Medea?
A56384Who was it that honour''d the Royal Family of France with the Title of a Bitch- Wolf and her Whelps?
A56384Who was it that stiled Mary Queen of England Proserpine?
A56384Who would ever contradict this Author in these Enquiries, that would admit those Postulata for self- evident Propositions?
A56384Who would not think this to be my intention?
A56384Why Widows Houses more then any others?
A56384Why so?
A56384Will he not call the Fowls of Heaven to eat the Flesh of Kings, and Captains, and great Men of the Earth?
A56384Will he suffer his youthful shamefacedness to overwhelm him in his old Age?
A56384Will not Age slake the Heats of his flaming Blood?
A56384With what Assurance of Authority will they restrain all Mens Faith to the Standard of their own Apprehensions?
A56384With what Curiosity will they strain for knackish and extravagant Applications of Holy Writ?
A56384With what Insolence will they pity his Ignorance and Insufficiency?
A56384With what Malapertness will they censure his Sermons, carp at his Expressions, and condemn his Doctrines?
A56384With what Zeal will they justifie the Equity and Good- Nature of a fatal and irrespective Decree of Reprobation?
A56384With what a scornful state shall some supercilious Saints trample upon all the great and all the learned men in the World?
A56384With what fetches of Wit will they distinguish themselves round about, till they come at last to affirm what at first they denied?
A56384With what partiality will they add or detract circumstances, as shall be most conducive to enhanse the ugliness of the slander?
A56384With what transport of Attention will these Godly People listen to a foul story of an Ungodly Parson?
A56384With what want of Confidence does he presume upon the World, to expect its acceptance of all his crude and undigested Thoughts?
A56384With what zeal do they spread and propagate and improve it?
A56384Would it become a serious Man to confute Jingles with grave and Scholastick Arguments?
A56384Would it much edifie with you to be roundly told, that you befool your self?
A56384Would not men say it was not the Lord, but Chance that hapned to them?
A56384Yea, whilst some can openly dispute against the Doctrine of the Trinity, the Deity of Christ, and the Holy Ghost?
A56384You forsooth boggle at tumults and disorders, poor ignorant souls, how unacquainted are you with the methods and workings of Providence?
A56384and are there not large Catalogues of particular Laws ranged under each of these general Heads?
A56384and baffle a School- Boys Phrase out of the Word of God?
A56384and does he violate all the Obligations of his Faith and Honesty?
A56384and how dexterously does he beat beside the main Questions?
A56384and how indecently will she laugh at his uncouth and ridiculous Mistakes?
A56384and how wantonly does he tire himself with insulting over the feebleness of its supposed Escapes and Subterfuges?
A56384and justly passed for a pitiful Coward, who when he durst not assail the Body of his Adversary, fell a fighting with his Shadow?
A56384and must all, saving onely two, be revers''t for your pleasure?
A56384and that Men should indispose themselves for the Discipline of Christianity, by being adorn''d with its best and choicest Qualifications?
A56384and that so whet with Provocation, and so eager upon Revenge?
A56384and what Ruptures in the Church?
A56384and what an horrid Noise do we hear of Atheism, Atheism, Atheism?
A56384and what if he shrowd Pride and Insolence under the covering of a sheepish Humility?
A56384and where has it allowed the use of the former, and disavowed the lawfulness of the latter sort of Ceremonies?
A56384and with what foul- mouthed Crys and Consequences does he pursue them?
A56384and with what success have they improved and cultivated this Field from the good days of Queen Elizabeth down to our own?
A56384and yet what a silly Wretch is it in the Mysteries of Religion?
A56384are not these my own words?
A56384are there not twelve Houses of Affirmative, and as many of Negative Commandments?
A56384have we not six hundred and thirteen Precepts in our Law?
A56384hereafter I will set my heart at ease, for what Adversary can ever hope to escape these mens slanders, that dare attempt to blast Hookers Reputation?
A56384how Magisterially will she censure his Sermons?
A56384how confidently will she cavil at his Doctrines?
A56384how nimbly does he frisk over the greatest Difficulties?
A56384how will that endear them to his Government, and oblige them to their Duty?
A56384it is expresly said to have been?
A56384may they not be falsely father''d upon him?
A56384not all, but some, i. e. matters of outward Worship, and that are not in themselves apparently or essentially evil?
A56384or Providential Alterations in their subserviency to Christ''s Exaltation, applyed to his Majesties Defeat at Worcester?
A56384or he that is born of a Woman, that he should be righteous?
A56384or to lanch forth among such Fanatick Herricano''s?
A56384or why should it offend me if Clowns want Breeding and Good Manners?
A56384peculiarly fitted to charm and bewitch their affection without, nay, against all reason?
A56384should run a tilt at one another?
A56384to encounter a wretched Fancy with a Rational Discourse?
A56384to say that Poetry was always imployed to cheat and gull the easie multitude?
A56384what Sholes of Hebrew, Greek, and Latin Quotations might I heap up, in my own defence?
A56384what can we be but Papists?
A56384what do we talk of that, that is a Burthen too heavy for their weak shoulders?
A56384what if every Affront transport him into all the Disorders of Passion and Revenge?
A56384what if he be peevish and impatient of Contradiction?
A56384what if he scorn and trample upon his Betters?
A56384what is the matter?
A56384what is this to the Friendly Debate, and the Nonconformists?
A56384what it is to govern and conduct them?
A56384what so dear to them as their sweet Redeemer?
A56384wherefore do ye doubt?
A56384will he not do it speedily?
A56384with what eagerness do they listen to any spiteful and mischievous report?
A42757( These are his own words in the preface of his Quaeries) whether hath he gone in an even path to avoid both these evills?
A42757( the very pla ● e cited by himselfe) according to all the Ordinances of the passeover they shall keep it?
A4275712?
A4275714. were it not contrary to that end to countenance and embolden him by receiving him to publike Church communion at the Lords Table?
A4275718. Who meant by the wise men of the Jewes?
A4275718. is such as is agreeable to the Law of Moses, and they understand by Tell the Church, Tell the Magistrate, I aske what Magistrate?
A4275718. where the context and circumstances will much more enforce this sence, then in the other two places?
A4275718?
A4275718?
A4275719?
A427572 What was the meaning of the bitter Herbs, with which the Passeover was commanded to be eaten?
A4275724. doth not this intimate the will of God, that Pasto ● s and Elders be over us in the Lord, and rule us Ecclesiastically?
A4275725 Then Jud ● … s which betrayed him answered and said, Master Is it I?
A4275726. saith Christ infallibly knew) But who dare thinke or say so of Jesus Christ?
A4275726?
A4275728. to 35?
A42757299. in the sixteenth of Matthew Christ begins with all his disciples, Whom say ye that I am?
A427573. observeth, Qui admissi sint ad istam Coenam?
A427573. the Chald ● readeth thus, Who shall be worthy to ascend unto the mountaine of the house of the Sanctuary of the Lord?
A42757350 Quis non videt quales nos ad mysticam hanc Domini mensam accedere oporteat?
A427574. should not be intended for the same worke, I can not imagine?
A427574. you have built to your selves ceiled houses, how much more ought ye to have built the house of the Lord?
A427576?
A427577. concerning many of the Pharisees comming to the Baptisme of Iohn, is that they were sent from Ierusalem with a message to ask Iohn, Who art thou?
A427577. he hath these words, our opposites generally grant,& c. citing onely Cartwright?
A427578. what?
A42757Againe, it might be objected, be they two or three, or more, what if they doe not agree among themselves?
A42757Aliquis suspenditur& excommunicatur?
A42757An Apostolus Paulus cum hominem incestuojum Satanae tra ● … ret, quicquam peculiare habuerit?
A42757An Christus qua Mediator sit adorandus?
A42757And Joshua said, why hast thou troubled us?
A42757And are the old non Conformists of blessed memory, now Opposites?
A42757And for the word King, it may well come in where Head commeth: for is not Christs Kingdom as Mediator, commensurable with his Headship as Mediator?
A42757And he saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in hither, not having a wedding garment?
A42757And hence it was also, that the wise men who came to enquire for Christ, said, Where is he that is born King of the Jews?
A42757And how can one be said to be under Church censure, who still enjoyeth all Church priviledges?
A42757And how many Synagogues was Paul cast out of?
A42757And if his Argument conclude against a lesser Suspension from their right, why not also against the greater?
A42757And if we may not initiate such a one, how shall we bring him to the Lords Table?
A42757And in what respects it may be so called?
A42757And is not this the very thing we contend for?
A42757And now per omnes musas I beseech him, which of us involveth the Magistrate in ambition?
A42757And shall he thus abuse not onely his Reader, but the Word of God it selfe with palpable and grosse contradictions?
A42757And since Mr. Hussey will needs hold that Christ as Mediator is head of all things( which the Text saith not) what were the consequence hereof?
A42757And the E ● … nuch said, See here is water, what doth hinder me to be baptized?
A42757And was there so much roome to reele to and fro in the Synagogue?
A42757And what if any of them were in the second moneth also uncleane, by the touch of a deadbody or otherwise?
A42757And when Cherem or the greater excommunication is inflicted, what is the manner?
A42757And whether a Minister in giving him the Sacrament after such admonition, be no way guilty?
A42757And whether a Minister in giving him the Sacrament after such admonition, be no way guilty?
A42757And whether in purging of the Church he is obliged to follow the rules of Scripture, and to consult with learned and godly Ministers?
A42757And why are they called Stewards of the mysteries of God?
A42757And why doth not the latter part also belong unto all Christians?
A42757And why saith he that my answer was onely concerning that involving of the Magistrate?
A42757And why should not the Magistrate command Ministers to do the duties of their calling according to the Word of God?
A42757And why?
A42757And why?
A42757And why?
A42757Another thing to ask whether the Word determineth any one kind of Church- Government as necessary, and which it is?
A42757Another thing, to enquire whether God hath in his Word limitted a nation to any one particular kind of Civil Government, and if any, what it is?
A42757Are drunken persons able to examine themselves?
A42757Are not the two powers formally and specifically distinct?
A42757Are persons grossely ignorant able to examine themselves?
A42757Are the rules of Church fellowship looser and wider than the rules of civill fellowship?
A42757Are these Mr. Husseys lawes of disputation?
A42757Art thou the King of the Jews?
A42757At an non per Sacramenta etiam fides& regeneratio exhibetur?
A42757Behold, what a latitude?
A42757Both of them require singular qualifications, eminent gifts and endowments ▪ and of both it holds true, Quis ad haec idoneus?
A42757But I ask, Was it right and agreeable to the will of God, that the Apostle should wish their cutting off?
A42757But I ask, is it meant onely of the Word?
A42757But I pray, are civill punishments shortned or lengthened according to the parties repentance?
A42757But I pray, do all that serve Jesus Christ, hold their office of and under Christ, as Mediator, and as his Vicegerents?
A42757But Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
A42757But go to, thou which canst not suffer a man to be thy Pastor, to whom then wilt thou submit thy self?
A42757But he moves this doubt: when Iudas had said Is it I?
A42757But how could a man be cast out from the Congregation, and yet be free to come where the Congregation was Assembled together?
A42757But how could they make this use of a Divine judgement inflicted for some private sinne, they knew not for what?
A42757But how doe they loose the person excommunicated, and how doe they free him from the separation or the curse?
A42757But how doth he prove it?
A42757But how doth the baptizing in the name of Christ as Mediator, agree with the commission to baptize in the name of the Father ▪ Son, and holy Ghost?
A42757But how proves he that Christ was 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉?
A42757But how?
A42757But how?
A42757But if he do admit the distinction as Mediator, and as second person in Trinity, then why doth he so often quarrell it?
A42757But if you say how shall I know this man and that man?
A42757But is there any patterne or president in the Jewish Church, for keeping backe scandalous sinners from the Sacrament?
A42757But is this the confession that my argument did prove?
A42757But neither must the Argument go so, I have another thing to ask; what is that other work which will take up the whole man?
A42757But quid haec ad Rhombum?
A42757But what dorh the Synod bind upon them?
A42757But what gaineth M r Prynne hereby?
A42757But what is that to the Argument?
A42757But what was the ground of this consequence?
A42757But what was the peoples part in Repenting?
A42757But what was this confession?
A42757But what will Mr. Hussey say, if his great master Erastus be found a pleader for Baal, as much as I am?
A42757But when?
A42757But where is any such commission given to the civil Magistrate, Christian more then Heathen?
A42757But whether is the government of a Heathen Magistrate per se, simpliciter,& ex natura sua, unlawful and sinful?
A42757By M r Prynnes rule it must onely hold true in this case, when it fals within the compasse of the same power to get both Wisdome and Gold?
A42757Can any alledge the like reason for admitting them to the Sacrament?
A42757Can any man forbid water that these should not be baptized which have received the holy Ghost as well as we?
A42757Can any man imagine that all such unworthy persons were excommunicate and wholy cast out of the Church?
A42757Can not a Christian rebuke his brother who scandalizeth him, and if he repent forgive him?
A42757Could there be so many of them and employed also in the building of the Temple, and yet no civill company kept with them?
A42757Dare any say that the Lord Jesus shall not governe the Church of England, and reigne over the same?
A42757Did prophane persons defile the Sacrifices of old, and do they not defile our Sacraments?
A42757Do all acknowledge that the Sacraments of the Old Testament were converting Ordinances?
A42757Do not all Chrysostomes Arguments militate against the admission of any scandalous and unworthy person known to be such?
A42757Do not the Erastians endeavour to draw the Parliament into the very same absurdity with which the Prelats were pressed?
A42757Do not ye judge them that are within?
A42757Do these now repent, reform, and come prepared?
A42757Doe not ye judge them that are within?
A42757Doe not ye judge them that are within?
A42757Doe not ye judge them that are within?
A42757Doth a man get life because he eats and drinks, or doth he not rather eat and drink because he lives?
A42757Doth not this destroy what he hath been arguing for, that Christ as Mediator is head of all Principality and Power?
A42757Doth the paternity of a heathen father differre specie, from the paternity of a Christian father?
A42757First, what if we should affirme it, as he doth?
A42757First, who did 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉, but 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉?
A42757For how can he who is authorized to be a Judge say, Who made me a Judge?
A42757For how can it be supposed that Christ would tacitely allow of alienation from or severity to pious Publicans?
A42757For how doth the Magistrate govern the Church?
A42757For how shall ever this reach the admission of known prophane persons to the Lords Supper?
A42757For that in Matthew and Marke, that Christ discoursed of the Traytor, and that Iudas said Is it I?
A42757For why?
A42757Good Lord, where are we, if this shall be the up- shot of our Reformation?
A42757H ● … w much better is it to get wisdome then Gold?
A42757Hast thou appealed unto Caesar?
A42757Hath the child fed with milk more communion and conversing with his father, then the son come to years, who eateth and drinketh at his fathers Table?
A42757Have you appealed to the Jewish Church?
A42757He might have saved himself the labour, for who knowes not Hieromes distinction?
A42757He that is commanded to edifie his brother, and then giveth scandall to him, doth he not trespasse against his brother?
A42757Homo, quis me constituit Judicem aut divisorem inter vos?
A42757How came they to thinke the Church can not erre?
A42757How can he then contend that the Apostle speaketh here of Christ as Mediator?
A42757How can it be then supposed that he giveth here Lawes concerning civill rather then spirituall injuries?
A42757How can the Minister warn such persons not to come to the Sacrament unlesse they repent, reform, and come prepared?
A42757How comes this home to that which he undertook to prove?
A42757How commeth it to passe that he chargeth me with the denying of that, which himself but two pages before had observed that I denie it not?
A42757How could they then admit to the passeover those whom they thought themselves obliged to persecute even unto hell?
A42757How dare any Minister seriously dehort any unworthy person from approaching to it?
A42757How doe they confesse?
A42757How doth Christ rule over the beasts, fowles, fishes?
A42757How had the false Apostles insulted at this?
A42757How ill it hath been harboured in all the reformed Churches?
A42757How is it then imaginable that they admitted such a one to eat the Passeover?
A42757How much lesse would Christ himselfe say so, or mean so in reference to Iudas?
A42757How much more doth the Lords Supper, necessarily, by Christs institution, suppose that the receivers are not unconverted and unbeleeving persons?
A42757How much more may we suppose that the Antient Jewes did keep civill company and fellowship with such Gentiles as did observe all these seven precepts?
A42757How shall prophane ones be perswaded by their ears to beleeve that whereof they see the contrary with their eyes?
A42757How shall the Censurers themselves be censured?
A42757How stiffled by Erastus himselfe?
A42757How sweetly doe his Tenents agree together?
A42757How the Controversie was lately revived?
A42757How then can it be supposed, that those who were esteemed as heathens, were admitted to all Church priviledges, as well as the best Israelites?
A42757How then can we by giving the Sacrament to such as these, give the lye to the Word?
A42757How then makes he this Sacrament to be the most powerful and effectual Ordinance of all others, to humble, regenerate, convert?
A42757How then, saith he, that Paul doth expresly interpret it?
A42757How to forgive him?
A42757How was it then reckoned?
A42757How well doth this hang together?
A42757I answer for the latter part of the Quaere, I know not the least ground, for who did ever expound it of suspension from the Sacrament onely?
A42757I ask therefore Mr. Hussey, What do you mutter here?
A42757I beseech you how could it be at all judged of, whether it was external and onely in shew, if it was made to God alone?
A42757If Consistoriall admonition be a binding, where is the loosing of that bond?
A42757If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe if I tell you of Heavenly things?
A42757If Miriams father had spit in her face, should she not be ashamed seven daies?
A42757If he could not prove it, why brings he a strong affirmation instead of an Argument?
A42757If he could prove that what confirms doth also convert, why did he not do it?
A42757If it be said, why then doth the Apostle onely wish it?
A42757If it be so, how shall that hold universally true?
A42757If prima notio, why must not Elder women be Church- officers as well as Elder men?
A42757If the religious publican stood afarre off, how much more the prophane infamous publican?
A42757If there be not, then how can their Tenent avoid the prophanation of the Lords Table?
A42757If thou being a Iew, livest after the manner of the Gentiles, and not as doe the Iewes, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as doe the Iewes?
A42757If thou hadst a clear fountain committed to thy keeping, to be kept clean by thee, wouldst thou let filthy swine come and puddle in it?
A42757Is he as Mediator King to any to whom he is not Head?
A42757Is the raising, refressiing, and comforting of those who often fall through infirmity, the conversion or first grace which now we dispute of?
A42757Is the way of communion of Saints broader than the way of civill communion?
A42757Is there more evidenc ● of Saintship required in those who come to be baptized, then in those who come to the Lords Table?
A42757Is there not some cause to apply all this( and much more of this kind) even to Christian Law givers and Magistrates?
A42757Is this house which is called by my name, saith the Lord, become a den of robbers in your eyes?
A42757Is this the great Apostle of the Gentiles, who hath not power from God to work a miracle, when himself professeth he would gladly have it wrought?
A42757It can not be meant of death, for it is said that Hymeneus and Alexander were delivered to Sathan, and to what end?
A42757It s a sinne to reproach a mans name, how much more to reproach Gods Name?
A42757It s deadly decay and consumption, whence it was?
A42757It was an impious word of Cain, Am I my Brothers Keeper?
A42757Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump?
A42757Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lumpe?
A42757Know ye not that we shall judge Angels?
A42757Lord who shall abide in thy Tabernacle?
A42757MR. Hussey in his Epistle to my selfe objecteth thus, What will your censure doe?
A42757Ministers are 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉, that is, house- stewards, or over the house; but what house?
A42757Must I be charged with involving the Magistrate because I discovered that Mr. Colemans Argument involveth the Magistrate?
A42757Must Ministers have vote in Parliament?
A42757Must all prophane persons be kept back from our 〈 ◊ 〉 ● s and publike Assemblies, and so from hearing the word?
A42757Must he not be received both as Lord and as Christ?
A42757Must his poenal satisfaction to the Christian Magistrate be a sufficient poenitential satisfaction to the Church?
A42757Must it not be communion in the holy things, and especially the receiving such a one to the Lords Table?
A42757Must there be no civill punishment, without previous admonition of the offender?
A42757Must they be civill Lawyers?
A42757Must they not then be excommunicate?
A42757Must we needs therefore say, that as Mediator he sate at meat in the Pharisees house, and as Mediator he wept for Lazarus?
A42757Must we therefore say that as Mediator he is the Son of David?
A42757Must we therefore say that this is meant of Christ onely as Mediator?
A42757Nam si ad pecuniam tibi obstrictus sum, numquid anathemati obnoxius sum?
A42757Nay further, What if the offender do neither 〈 ◊ 〉 nor actually persevere in his grosse scandalous sin?
A42757Nor whether Church- Officers may exercise an arbitrary irregular Government, and rule as themselves list?
A42757Nor whether Church- officers may have any Lordly government or imperious domination over the Lords heritage?
A42757Now how could it be knowne, whether a man had confessed any thing at all, if it was secretly, and to God alone?
A42757Now might one thinke, what of all this?
A42757Now what is an act of Government, if this be not, to receive accusations, and that against Elders, and that under two or three witnesses?
A42757Now what saith he to the reason I added, can Christ be a head to them that are not of his body?
A42757Now what will thy boasting magnificence say?
A42757Num enim mala erat buccella quae tradita est Judae à Domino?
A42757O ● for it?
A42757Of the power and priviledge of the Magistrate in things and causes Ecclesiasticall, what 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 not, and what it is?
A42757Or how shall they be fed in hope and sealed in assurance of everlasting life, who are yet under the curse of the Law and state of condemnation?
A42757Or whether doth he not here yeeld the cause?
A42757Otherwise how far is he from concluding by Analogy the point he had to prove?
A42757Qu ● … enim dicat apostatam, blashemum aliaque sacra capita intra templum suisse admissa?
A42757Quid percu ● it?
A42757Quid porro de his faciendum qui vitam Christianis indignam agunt?
A42757Quid sanat?
A42757Quis enim dicat Apostatam, blasphemum, al ● … áque sacra capita intra Templum suisse admissa?
A42757Quis me construit Judicem aut divisorem super vos?
A42757Quis nescit illo tempore Judaeos sub Romanis vixisse, ac praesidem eorum p ● rentibus omnibus jus dicere solitum suisse?
A42757Quod facis fac cele ● … ius, quid illud?
A42757Shall I com ● unto you with a rod?
A42757Shall a private man have power to cast off the whole Church as Heathens and Publicans?
A42757Shall he have one Kingdom as Mediator, and another as God?
A42757Shall it be a sin to Church- officers to exercise any act of civil government?
A42757Shall men that are unable to examine themselves be admitted to the Sacrament, because not disabled by any natural disability?
A42757Shall not the offender be cast out of the Church after clear proof of the offence, and several previous publike admonitions contemned or neglected?
A42757Shall there not be a better account of the word preached then of Magistracy?
A42757Shall we in the next place have a heape of humane testimonies concerning Iudas his receiving of the Sacrament?
A42757Shall we take this upon M r Prynnes credit, that it doth not appeare in any extant worke of theirs?
A42757Solomon being a Prophet, who knowes what warrants he had more then ordinary for that which he did to Abiathar?
A42757Stephanus, Beza, and Gualther, ritibus oneramini; the English Translators, are ye subject to Ordinances?
A42757That if there be necessity of satisfying an offended brother, how much more of satisfying an offended Church?
A42757The Angels of the Churches why reproved for having false Teachers in the Church?
A42757The Pope takes upon him to determine what belongs to the Canon of Scripture, what not?
A42757The Question is not whether Church- officers ought to have any share in the Civil Government?
A42757The Sacrament applyeth Christ, but to whom?
A42757The distinction of converting and confirming Ordinances how necessary in this question?
A42757The present controversie how different from the Prelaticall?
A42757The second example is the matter of Peor, where they did fall both into Idolatry and Fornication together; but what came of it?
A42757Then came Peter to him and said, Lord how oft shall my Brother sinne against me, and I forgive him?
A42757There is no peace to the wicked saith God, how much lesse can their peace be sealed to them?
A42757These doe not fall under the selfe- same precept?
A42757They doe not say to the Priests, Who did put any jurisdiction or authority to judge, in your hands?
A42757This he doth not nor can not denie:( which makes good my Argument;) Why did he not shew us the like concerning Magistracy?
A42757This they prove because Iohn saith to them O Generation of Vipers, who hath forewarned you to flee from the wrath to come?
A42757This they shall not finde, and why?
A42757Thou hast put all things under his feet, all sheep and oxen& c. Now how is it that the Apostle applyeth all this to Christ?
A42757To the contrary of what?
A42757To what end then is the Sacrament of the Lords Supper instituted?
A42757Unde per hoc quod addit, Quis me constituit Judicem?
A42757Was it not profitable and necessary for the Churches good, that they should be cut off?
A42757Well: But what are nis two sorts of sealing?
A42757Well: but after all those publike previous admonitions, shall the sentence of excommunication follow?
A42757Were not the people of God thereby taught the necessity of Repentance in that very action?
A42757Were they not kept off in the second moneth, as well as in the first?
A42757What Argument is there here?
A42757What Conscience or ingenuity can there now be, in making any parallel between Papall and Presbyteriall Governement?
A42757What a great matter is made of meer nothing?
A42757What a wavering is here?
A42757What consequence is there here?
A42757What doth he drive at?
A42757What expectation could there be, that they did see a thing, then secret and unheard of, unlesse they had been men familiar with God?
A42757What great marvel if many among them( for I do not speak of all) did comply with the Erastian Tenent?
A42757What hath he gained thereby?
A42757What have I to doe to judge them also that are without?
A42757What if he had said Christ sent me not to rule but to preach the Gospel?
A42757What is it to be as an Heathen and a Publican?
A42757What is it, if he shall heare thee?
A42757What is more ordinary then to use the names of Jesus and Christ when the thing which is said is meant in reference to one of the natures?
A42757What is the manner of a simple excommunication or Niddui?
A42757What of that?
A42757What the Erastians yeeld unto us, and what we yeeld unto them?
A42757What the are chief obstacles hindering Excommunication?
A42757What then hath Presbytery to doe with Prelacy?
A42757What then shall become of such scandalls as are not crimes punishable by the law of the land?
A42757What then should hinder the sealing?
A42757What then?
A42757What then?
A42757What then?
A42757What will your censure do Paul?
A42757What would those our proud gyants, fighters against God do here, if they had stood in the like condition and high place?
A42757What( say these) shall that poor fellow lay a yoke on me?
A42757What, should I be subject to this naughty and rude Pastor?
A42757What?
A42757What?
A42757What?
A42757When he was in Circumcision or in uncircumcision?
A42757Whence comes all this new logick which the world never knew before?
A42757Where are we?
A42757Where the Syriack readeth thus: And what agreement hath the Temple of God with the temple of Divels?
A42757Where then shall the difference lie, if not in this, that there was an Ecclesiasticall Government, besides the Civill and Military?
A42757Where there is no charter, how can there be a sealing, except we seal blank paper?
A42757Whereas the Apostle saith, Why do ye not rather take wrong?
A42757Wherefore do I see every man with his hands on his loyns?
A42757Wherefore to prosecute my Argument, Why do we exclude Infants and Idiots?
A42757Whether hath he any just right or title to Government and Magistracy?
A42757Whether hath he not so gone about to cure the heat of the liver, ▪ as to leave a cold and phlegmatick stomack uncured?
A42757Whether it be a full discharge of duty to admonish a scandalous person of the danger of unworthy communicating?
A42757Whether it he a full discharge of duty to admonish a scandalous person of the danger of unworthy communicating?
A42757Whether the Magistrate be Gods Deputy or Vicegerent, and as God upon earth; for who denies that?
A42757Which Paul also saith in these words, What have I to doe to judge them also that are without?
A42757Which three as they are distinguished in God ▪ Thine is the Kingdom, and the power, and the glory: Why not in the Mediator also?
A42757Who Epicurean Israelites?
A42757Who can imagine his meaning to be, that he would work a miracle upon them and all other?
A42757Who can mistake the thing so far as to think that Christ hath instituted and ordained this Sacrament to be a meer external seal and no more?
A42757Who doth now delude the vulgar?
A42757Who ever heard of an external examination of mens hearts between God and their own Consciences?
A42757Who knows not, that many universalls in Scripture are to be restricted, and not to be understood as the words at first sound?
A42757Who said it, or where?
A42757Who were esteemed Hereticall or apostat Israelites?
A42757Why doe ye not rather take wrong?
A42757Why doth he not attend to the drift of the Argument?
A42757Why doth he not prescribe or command to excommunicate them?
A42757Will any man imagine that a penitent theef accusing himself, was excommunicated?
A42757Will any man say, that they were to put a difference between the holy and prophane in other Ordinances, and not in the Passeover?
A42757Will he allow the Lord Major, and all the godly Ministers who have eaten at the Lord Majors table to avoyd M r Prynne as an Heathen and a Publican?
A42757Will not this then hold as well for the Institution of a Government in the Church?
A42757Would not Christ much more have excepted Iudas in these expressions, if he had been present, seeing he had so often excepted him before?
A42757Yea, was not prophannesse and open wickednesse more hatefull to God than legall uncleannesse?
A42757an dubium est, neque legem quicquam ab injustis, neque solem à tenebris accipere?
A42757and shal it be no sin to the civil Magistrate to ingrosse the whole and sole power of Church- Government?
A42757and shall it be lawful to them alone, while they glory in the Law, to dishonour God by breaking of the Law?
A42757and shall not the whole Church have power to cast off one man as an Heathen and Publican?
A42757and that therefore certainly the Sacrament was given to Iudas, because he was the last man that said Is it I?
A42757and to get understanding rather to be chosen then Silver?
A42757and why doth he find fault with my exposition that the Apostle speaketh here of Christ as God?
A42757and why not in the Passeover, as well as in other Ordinances?
A42757are all Governments?
A42757are not their children bound to honour them, and be subject to them, and obey them in things lawful?
A42757are they not both lawful parents, being made such by God and nature?
A42757as cleare as the noon day sun?
A42757as if he had said, If scandalous brethren be spots in your common, how much more in your sacred Feasts?
A42757c Quid tum fec ● runt Ezra, Zerobahel,& Jehoshua?
A42757can we goe no higher?
A42757discipuli solum, Who were admitted to that( eucharistical) Supper?
A42757doe not ye judge them that are within?
A42757for how should civil ruling come in among the Ecclesiastical administrations, especially in those dayes when Magistrates were not Christian?
A42757for this, he tells us onely Quis dubitat?
A42757for what difference was put between the holy and prophane, when the prophane were received as well as the holy?
A42757how can it strengthen him in this particular?
A42757how dost thou know that I am a Iudge?
A42757how much more the fountain of the Blood of Christ?
A42757how much more things that pertain to this life?
A42757how much more when God hath smitten her with leprosie for speaking against his servant Moses?
A42757how will he reconcile himself?
A42757if the power of Government and censures be in the hands of Church- officers, how shall they be censurable and punishable for their owne offences?
A42757let all men judge( saith he) whether the Apostle would make it unlawfull to other wronged persons, which he thought lawfull for himself?
A42757must all criminall and capitall Judgements be according to the Judiciall Law of Moses, and none otherwise?
A42757o The Centurists think that the Pharisees who were sent from Ierusalem to Iohn to ask him Who art thou?
A42757or are they straiter?
A42757or is it in the hearts of all other men?
A42757or is it narrower?
A42757or was it onely a generall confession made by the whole congregration of Israel at a solemne Fast and humiliation?
A42757or what was that Church which they thought infallible?
A42757our Translators supply from their company: but from what company of theirs?
A42757saith he not, that all simply or without distinction whom they perceived to come unworthily were to be put back?
A42757saith he, are all Prophets?
A42757shall such arguments be therefore inconcludent?
A42757those who commit crimes and wickednesse?
A42757was it his meaning to work a miracle upon every fornicator, and each other scandalous person in the Church of Corinth?
A42757was it onely a private confession to God alone?
A42757was spent before the distribution of the Sacrament, who is so wise as to know?
A42757what shall follow upon it?
A42757who makes Question of it?
A42757who shall dwell in thy holy hill?
A42757why doe ye not rather suffer your selves to be defrauded?
A42757will they set Paul against Christ?
A42757x What greater violence could be offered to the Text?
A42757● eing spoken of that supper at which Christ told his Disciples that one of them should betray him, and every one asked Is it I?
A42757〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 properly what?
A42757〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉 〈 ◊ 〉, Who made thee a Ruler and a Judge?